Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
09/20/1965 - 5990
REGULAR COUNCIL MBST1NG AGENDA - SBPTEl108R 20, 1965 MMMSS- Regular Meeting, September 70 1965 Pages 1 - 330 Canvass of Election. September 15, 1965, Pages 166 - 1720 to On Assessment Roll - SS&SW#58 (Continued from 9/7/65), Pages 34 - 38. 20 1966 Budget (Continued from 9 /7/65), 30 Second Reading of ordinance Classifying Additional Zoning Districts, Page 390 40 Second Reading of ordinance vacatimi Portion of Street - Johnson ®s Riverlane Addition, Page 400 5o Resolution Confirming Assessment Roll - SS"V#58, . Pages 41 - "0 60 Fridley- Colua6iia heights Drainage (Tabled 9/7/65), 7o Resolution ordering isprovewent, Approval of Final Plans and Specifications and Ordering Side - S#76 (Tabled 9 /7/65).9 Page 450 8o Proposed AWMdaent to Chapter 56 - Signs (Tabled $/16/65), Pages 46 - 570 9* Proposed Franchise Ordinance - American oil Company (Tabled 9/7/65), Pages 58 - 60. 100 Communication, Pages 61 - 71e (a) Golden Valley Garden Club: Donation (b) Sacred Heart Church: Assessment (c) Sngineeriny Departmrut: Gas Main installation (d) Midland Consultants: Crossing (e) City Engineer: 56th Avenue Northeast (f) Suburban Sngineering: SS#77 (g) City Engineer: ss#12 j Its i Building Board Muting Minutes, September Be 19650 Page 720 12. Safety Committee Meeting Minutes, September 9e 19658 Page 730 I• 0 REGULAR COLBiCIL X=TIBG AGRMII - SRPT81®RR 208 1965 (Continued) 139 Planning Commission Meeting Minutess September 9, 1965, 14. Board of Appeals Meetinc! Minutes, Septembet 15. 1965, 15, Fridley Housing. and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minut,kws September le 1565, 16a Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes, September 88 1965, 17* Bids - RMWf CJJUj Tennis Courts - Comons Park. (Opened Doan, September 20, 1965)o VIA 8ITMB 180 Building Permit 6 Variance - 6050 - 5th Street Northeast, Bess, 190 Building Passdt & Variance - 6866 - 7th Street Bortheast, Car:lstene 20a Application for Sign Pesmsit, 21, Building Permit - 6001/6005 University Avenue Northeast, b archiafavas 22. Claims, 23. Ratimatess 24. Licenses 25. Petitions, 26. Appropriation Ordinau" for First Reading - 1966, 27. Ordinance Aaanding Chapter 24 - Parka and Recreation commmissions 28. Ordinance Designating Chapter 20 - Handbill Dis- tributions 29, Proposed Ordinance to Armand Section 77.01 - Beach Closingo Pages 74 - 76o Me 167. Pages 77 - 85. Pages 86 - 1030 Page 104. Pages 105 6 106. Page 1070 pages 108 % 1090 Page 110. Pages 111.- 113. page 114. Pages 115 & 116.. Page 117. Pages 118 - 121. Pages 122 - 126. page 127, 0 J RX LAR COUNCIL MUTING AGBM A - SRPTMMR 20, 1965 (Continued) 30. Consideration of Quotation for Tornado Duep Cleanup, 31. Proposed Fridley- Columbia Heights Agrernsnt - 88#12, 32. Authorising Bids to Replace City Car, Page 128 - 141. Page 142. 33 $nekueiew-Approving Signal Installations (49th i Avenue and T.H. #47)v ,;�'� /� 17 z Age 143. /W' Ov— /y6 a, 34, Resolution Certifying Charges to the County Auditor, Pages 144 - 145. /�9 -1105 35. Resolution Approving M.HoDo Agresarant Noo 54803, Pages 146 - 1530 36, Re- Affirming Resolutions moo 144 -1965, Pages 153 - 155. 37. Four Resolutions Ordering Repair or Removal of DuPlexes, / 7 / T// / -7 Z 7 S 38. Two Resolutions Authorizing Splitting Assess Gets - Lot 14, Auditor °s Subdivision #92 and;�Lots 2 and 3, Auditor °s Subdivision #78, 39. Resolution La�vjng Preliminary Plans and Specifi- cations and Calling a Hearing - SWa.SS#73 -9, I �S Pages 156 - 162, Pages 163 & 173. Pages 164 - 1660 F- -1 L-A maim -NEAVMS le on HI q ROLL SSSM#SS CCONTIN= FROM 9/7/65)s On Page 34 is a niew memo from the Finance Djxoatcw att4WtjW to aWlein the prablemo =4 possible solutions, on Pages 35 tbrotap 38 are four diffeampt assessment rolls which are partially V I In the mmm an Pago 34# but can be Awthm explained by Me* Unmaell at the riotinga 1AMW Cochran did not oars In to No m an the rVI4WW followipg the Sqptedw 7th meeting* and I aloutaQted hips this week and today he advised as that he had thought the CotAnall had only one mimeting per month, and that be was not prepared to discuss the matter with " today, so we have aft up a nimeting between Mr. Cochran and qVWIf for seQtemdheac 28th, and tbtmfoce, I suggest tb^t if at all possibles this hearing be omt&uued over to the Octabdir 4th meeting; 2, 1966 BUDGET ( m m 11111 r'ED FROM 9/7/653; In Ma #26 Sol" cw4 ag is as appropriation oxidinance for first Wouding for the 19" budget, WhIMb I had to prepare at this time not )MMIMS what the results of the h*WLW JA WA heft Might We 1:9 you M%6 MW ft=W" in the budget, pass the AMWIAtIm ordinance In Item #U un fteft 14WdJxQ# And we WILL MW that the 919=48 are • amwcaged, an per MW ChmWou you adaht minks. , t'j "'- g - j : j r. ► 7# 4o SIMOM YJMIW. Or no MWM VAMZUG PORTION Or STMT -0 Jam' S RIVSRIA AWITSOUS This aacdiname for second &*Mbv Is cc page 406 So RNSOLUTZOR CXWIRICM ROm - SSWIMSSI The resolutim Sm OU PWOM 41 UIVOUP ", If You *WUW cOntimn the hearing An Ited #It above, to the October 4th MeetLugo you QoQ)A table action. cc this resolution to the MUbM 4th meeting also, 6 FRZVWVmCMMZh IMIMTS MRAMPAS (TABLU 9/7/653 I have no watwj" On this since the Council UU81y tabled it to this im� at your last UfttlMb ACtLM hGVG if YOU 80 ft$A►O* WW43A be to bWe the Consulting SMAROW work .with C01=61a, Heights an this dr"m*e 7*. RBSOLVITSM ZIMIVINW 11 P, ARPRWIAL Or PLW Am HIMMSCIMOND (FIML) MM RMG BIDS - 8076 (TABM 9/7/653: The 3remlation, is an Page 45, Previous comall discussion on thin It4m is an age no XWULM COUNCIL lB TIUG AGIMM OCOPM qp BEPT BBR 20, 1965 (Continued) Be PROPOWD Alai 1A 1 TO CWU?29R 56 SIOliS letter fCOM the City AttocASy VhIdh is st Pages 46 and 47, and the aardinasx.v Ls on This aWdinance was discussed by the lhaal DIXOCtG Ci this Roan, and th4y was W like to oataber 4tho (TARrAD SAG/G&) s A rlfe>�lanatooCy is on Pages 48 throagh 87o mar of caimagos Board of to have t&* asattAC bWX 90 PROPOSD ZAS OitDtJtil A16RI<'M OIL COMM (MUM 9/7/") it The aardinanoe is an Pages 58 through 60. The City AttamW can anam any gmestians that you a ght have sriative to , it. 10* CO!l1aJ112�`ATZ0�1S t (a) Golden valley Gwwden lCIV61, Doaatiant The letter on Page 61 is self- aoplaustacy: • (b) stated newt chumhs Arseasaatss�ts A repa�sslywk tiw of the chusdh will be past at the =Mtiog at %hI h ties I Wqp Not the F.inaDae Diteatar will be able to summer auy questions that you merit haven te; sDgine.ci�a Departm�snt: ors main snstallatioat The t,.�to on Page 63 is "IfoOspliMatarys and tbfto is a d1CaMlnq iilustacating the sans an Page 64. tdi Aidiand Consutltants s OmssU* s The lett4W an Page 65 is e� seif- Wumatawyo The wit is an Page 66. (e) City engineers 56th Avenue Ractheasts fte 0=0 is on Page 67 and the amp U an Page 68. %tA City inginest am go into =we detail It YOU so desireo (9) smbuOm 8nginescUV a Stamm 8ear+sc 4771 Tips Utter an Pare 69 is Bel eog4AMUCy9 (9) City Enginews 003.2s 2fte ttrso is an Page 70, snd the wo as Page 71. The City Iingineec am go Law note dst U if you vials. 13.0 sOtLDma HOARD own= xmvm, SSP'1!l!5l3R 15. 1965: 2%* x1 at w a" on Pago 720 Both sewm" foe putts awe riaooAO - foc %Vcoval, aAd the details of th* plans will be available at the mmtir4fp 12 SAY= =Tma jinbm i. n 1Bt 9s 1965i fte Minutes ass can Psgi� 73 The Minutes are. G"f- WWlW&t0sy4 TI fttaii of the (waves Gas station plans VUL be available at the aMtisg0 130 PLADR M Oa04I8Si= 1/M=M ltiDfttl'Ma 00921aM R 9, 1965: The minutes at* ad. Pages 74 tbtaugh 76e to Ma 04e Page 75s the Cauataiasich 6600eats that t&a in *-- 4 t we yc pomd fait' tho. 9r asan•s Hssket Pacaprarty doss appear. to caalwy with the ai Boning. =n its* d3: Page Its the Cosml,ssl on s+e m n ow, do thi lot split o Thrace should b6 bett6t 4stail dro oings available at the west ga it NCO Ciseraki i41 t.es the sketch lrg aired by tht t ■atissietn0 Iu UAW #6, Page` 76e the staeft pstt is s'eoo0niaidsd by the Planning` CaMissioat and ftewings of this paroposai will be at the nweitinge T'4Lia 1�onc1»drS the plien3ng COMMASSUM Mdaut"e 14o SCUM OF APES MUTDU 1M[ MSe 1S; 19GSt 2how minutes we an PAO 1676 The Board that the Kai'3anQe be o a><ttede. 2h ere will be: a e, detail at the meeting foe► yomr ins,Pe�iaat. 1$o FRS 13DUSIM AND it3L1BVaLCt1T A t9tITY - molino3 abih =92Bwi • MM J. 1965 These Minutes asvt on Pages 77 tbio 8l with othrc popme 062t td this office by the Rousing Attthoarit~y non leftt7y ooer' seeming t M66 :Mantes found ae Pages 82 tbrough 85ii 160 !'itID= iLO�Stbit3 AM IDBVSLOPI8tf - AMMMY IEST= lfIOWM • UP- 22111M 8 J."S Time minuios area an Pages 86 tbftUO 91. "1 W I is othi . aat ,asl, that was s+azt. along with tbe". Ulautift to this office an Pang 92 throtWh 103, that I asset a is part of the minutes. 17. BIDS RBSUIZF 11 Ma TENM T9 • C70 PARK (Mommin itooue BtkP'1'S'tiFdit 20e 1965): The -bid 'tabulation sheet is an Page 1", fte re WSU be a tabulation of the actual. bids far yoo at the AMOUX4i 1S. B=DZMG PST AM VARIAM - 60SO • 5M SST BdCl' ABT • Bess s The bending permit application is on Page 105* and a sketch Of the variaue is an Page 106. This t believe has bean alsanaisOd With you, by swa Suess parevic"I'Yr 190 BVIW=G PST Am VAR?AM r0 6866 • 7M STMT Hahn • QNRX Tit , The Building permit application is an Page 107, and the VeWoest fCOr the VurIAMM is at the ba►ttan of the gage. f 200 APPLZMTICR FM SIQB FZRWTs The aMlle tion is as Page ]LOS* ad a dsaaMriag -of same is on Page 109, t haw not had a chaos: to dseft this Ott with that Building Inspea ion DapasLMeIt" so I � a !fiat It is on the agenda because the ewuncii bas to give appmowal a Pray hags the City Attomw will be pempatred to adwlse you at the meeting. 7 �l.c c;i,�1 v• 'i. - '.1' L �1 4e • 21* SUVA- 0 PJWJW - W01/6005 t=VBRSITY AV== T - 1949MUm FAVA: At this writing, I have no plans that I Tema► of available toc your in poatiaue but T an , pU MU9 it on the ageanda In CUM said plane axe available at the time Qf the meeting0 220 CIAMs 2M GUAM nVMbWS are OR Page 1109 MALL o:9 the claims is luc dvAM3 in the envelope -with the aQendaO 239 RR VIUMMSS A list of estlU tas is on Pages 111 cad 112 and a ovate rate estimate groat the Civic Center !,s an page U39 249 Lxcx=ss A list of lime[nses is an Page 114. 'Wes stave been e2redWd; out by the Building Inspection Dspastw�at. 25. P"-'Prom S The petitions are an Pfagis 115 and 1160 26. APPBO!ltIA1 OR ORD FOB y.JM l' itXPjYM - 19661 'ate a0 MAXIMUM Em first rUi AU* is an Pago 117. I disawnsed it in ItGR *2e abatis. 270 _ _ _ AIBWZW CBAPM 24 - PAitiSB ACID OiCRi X IN BIONI "M letteac an Page 3L1S eaKp &UM the CaedinMW* on Pages li9 tfisouoh 1210 290 MDMR= IXS= MN?M 20'— IMO= %be lmaa md4nanc�e.,an Pages 122 tbsom* 126, I ba�ieve was s 10, t 1 a by commi 29. prA OI0Iino To ANUM SBCTIM 77.01 - BXACR CLOOMI The oo�+dinauwe an Pago 127 was suggested at a previous meetu* nand is paeesented to you as prepared by the City AttOMWO 30o CMSSDB WM N OF QinOR'ATI09 FOR VONOM MW CLNNWt We bgte to havo several gytotations available goat your Umpeati mm at this ateetiag goat cleaning vp the tornado burning site now Lodes Pack, At this 'wz:Ltinge I do not haw but coos to st*mit to yj=v so they will be given to you at the m m*3490 31 a PROPOSED to ASTON'S 1 BIB 1 T - MOM 2be agreesaen 0 as discussed by nVself, the City 3ngineere the City Att=Wv cad lOc. Com stamke Consulting 3109UMM a with the City HROMM of Coluadit R*MAtse their engineer and their attarnqy will be found an Pages 128 Owough 135, with the s in said agrememeat an Pages 136 tbrGUO 1.419 We Most tbat we cyan Vqm%§% Neetd this to the Council as a satI82ftCtaary agreement 9 "to City AttarurOt far Ca1UMbia Rei+gbts is drawing an agleam sm t to grovide pacoteatiou for the City of FrJALW solative to the $600,000900 that CosuObia Rolots will have dUWtlye fraat the sale of beads. City AttcCMW Sndth am aWlaiu this to you turtbe c at the meetUtge 0 C'. {) PIN 4!'i}i: �i.• ;i: i:. "t '.t ?:a ?.[i �.• yd V' :1 :y' ;y' .,! •, li 32o AV$OMZW BIDS TO R'BPLAM CM CARS The bid mot3ae is on Page 142. The City will have a -- ximately $1,200 to $1,300 to apply toward this now oar sines this will be replaaing the w"dod city Valiant that was purchased In DeAember of 1962. Coat: of this e'er to the City should be astound $500' to $600 additU nal. 339 R1'SOLUTZOBT APPIMING SZMML 449TH AVSM ll111112Bli M AM ToB. #47) s I At t h 4 a writing, I do not have the x 'a olutSm so I (lave piaasd the letter oat Page 143 and I aqmat that the RtOWW DSpWt" mot will have a mran here at the meeting , with the reoasution o 34o RSSOLVZM xFrlBiCi C&VAM TO 20 COMITY AWZ=s Me re"lutim on Page 144 Is OvIainid by the letter on Page 145, 35 0 FASOLVZM APPROVM U.Ho Do AO=l I I BT Wc, 54803: The agreswest Is as Pages 146 thraugh 152. fte resolution whU t I received too late to iuelnd® In tite agamU. will be found In the envelope with yew argen"a The City AttozuW* I hops will stave bird aloe to go over this I m sanrent prior to t3m Coma" msotsmo so .that h• cam sake a aeec — m adatiou to yvei. 36, FX-JWFIRUM RRSOLUTIODt So. 144-1965s The Is net Pages 153 through 155 o the City Attu Con eawlain to you the voca lty far placing title an the age mMa 37o FOM RBSOLD2'IMS AtTATIO UMG RNMU -OS RRDOVAL OF MAIM Wo A aasplehe "Solution is found on Pages 156 tbr=lgh 1590 The flatet Meet for the other three reeolutioaas Ja cc Pages 160 t Wmus'h 162o Pages 157 throast 159 mould also be used with emb we of the than resolutions on Pages 160 tbx=agb 162, but time . ad preparlm them In theft entivet y, since Pages 156 through 159. would give you a Caaplete ale of the other three resotutlass0 Inainded In the envelope with your agenda is the motive of amwt aaei on For one of these duplexes. There will be aw of these feet each irsolnisY�oes, If yam pass the s'esolutiotso 38. TWO RSSOfft MOM AVMQR=ZW SPLITsm: ASSSSSmm • IAT 14, ADDI'1TSts8 SMXVZSXCU 092 ACID LOTS 2 AM 3, AUDTMOS #78s Tate renclutiou fat Lot 14, AmUt=Oss . Subdivision 692 Is an Page 173, mead rssolutiar► for Lots 2 and 3, Audit:oc • s Subdivision 478 is net Page 163 these are the routine resolutionaa 390 MOLU'P7 M ==ZVM PRIIL_ _n 11 py Plan AM 813=20AIM +lS JWD t'Aid m A BR$ZIIGi - 8W&S9*73r8s The reeolutiion is net Page 164 and the notice -oil hemsm is on pages 165 and 166, You will note m Pmga 165, that this coapLt�a some Sm i 3,aparo�renwnt IMOjeats that have been bnught togetbw fee this part miliar paeojeet rnXdMo X as soazy that this agenda is so lcog, particuiar2y in v1W of the length of the one foe' Septml A, aar Who but thW* sees to bs no end to the. amount of business that must be 0=804aced by the Couueii o secaws the - - -- R d , w 7th ms*tU* was bald an a Thy, and beoau�e I trill not be peace an VVI& Y, there haw been only 7 . woarkLm clays in which to PCOPO re this agendae so i tvwt that thus wi11 not be too mwW caaetssi=a or too wMh lads of sufosms- tiaa in the agenda, t viii be bu is in the off IM m 8ipteai>eac 27, 1965o 0 0 0 A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fridley was called to order by Mayor Nee at 8o17 P.M. ROLL CALLS Members Presents Nee, Kirkham, Sheridan, Thompson (Wright arrived at 8x42 P.M.) Mbe9rs Absent: None APPROoVAL OF MINUTES - REGU R CMCiL MOTING CW. AUGUST 161 1965: Motion by Kirkham to adopt the minutes of the Regular Council Ming of Aftust 16, 1965 as presented to the Council: Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL of MnU s ® s PECIAL COUNCIL =TING CAF AUGUST 23, 1965: Motion by Thompson to adopt the minutes of the Special Council M®stin of August 23, 1965 as submitted. Seconded by Kirkhma. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. MUM HEAMG: ASUSSMT ROIL - SS&SW #58, CONTiNM FRM4 EL23 Mr. :.sonars: Cochrau was present at the Council Ming. Mayor Nee stated that the reason for contiuuiug the hearing for SSOVI #58 is for the Council to hour the c-aim of one of the property (x ers that his property has already been assessed for sever and water services, and receives no benefit frogs this construction. Mayor Ree stated that the Council requested the Administration to investigate the claim of this property saner and report to the Council at this meeting. The City Manager stated that the City.has records to prove that Ontlot #1 teas not ,cousidered in the past assctsmeut as claimed by the property owner, and that this Ontlot is benefited:bY this construction. Mr. Cochran stated that when this construction vas made on old Central Avenue his property was deleted as €8 result of a petition opposing that portion of the iWrovemeut, signed by 100% of the land owners. He stated that the Co acil, at the preliminary hearing 'More the construction, rotated that they would not run the newer line on old Central since the property on old Central is nerved from Pierce Street. He stated that.he payed $1100 to connect his property to the services on Pierce Stet. Mr. Cochran stated that the Council agreed that he would not be assessed for this construction on old Central. He stated that he to also representing the Veterans of Foreign Wass, and wished to file a protest, in behalf of the Veterans of Foreign Wave, against this assessment. The Finance Director showed on the ring the construvtion of the services under question. He staled that all property on Central Avenue is paying at the same rate per front foot for the constructiot of the sewer services. He PAGE ! • stated that Mr. Cochrat eras tharged $1,098 to 1960 but this charge was to beck up a residence to the sewer and water servictan' Pierce Street. Mr. Cochran presented a card to the Council which he stated was a card mailed to Him by the City in 1962 informing him of notice of the assessment of the .cost for connection to his building. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Cochran whether the charge for the Connection was for sewer services for the ninth building lot in what we previously an eight lot plat. Mr. Cochran did not answer. Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Cochran whether his building is located on Let 15 in Auditor's Sub- Division #88. ctr. Cochran answered, "Yes." The Finance Director stated that this lot was re- platted and is now lot 5 in Don's Addition. W. Cochran stated that all assessments were-paid upon this 1=6 when the land was re-platted. The Finance Director stated that before the Land was first platted .here were an estimated eight building site* on Pierce Street, but vhou the land was re- platted there von nine building sites on Pierce Street. He stated that the charge in question was for the Ninth building site on Pierce Street. Be stag that the charges were $371.63 pee building site for eight building sites plus $1.47 per foot for 765 foot for a total of $4,097.59 for the eight building sites. The Finance Director stated that the charge for the ninth building site was more because of the increase in .costs in 1960. He stated that the charge for the ninth ;building site.on Pierce Street is the $1,098 previously mentioned by Mr. Cochran. • Ifr. Cochran stated that the plat wary Filed after the assessment was made for the ninth building site. 1'he Finance Director stated that 'examination of the records show that the charges were made in two parts. One charge of $566.79 for water and one charge of $53,054 for sewer. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Cochran whether the cost of connection of services to the math building site were paid. ,Ile. Cochran answered that he paid a charge for connection of services to the ninth building lot on a per front foot rate. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Cochran whether he discussed these questions with the City Officials since the last Council Meeting vhen this matter was first brought to the attention of the Council. Mr. Cochran answered, "Yes." The Mayor stated that the Council witibed to adjust this matter if possible and asked Mr. Cochran if he would discuss the matter with the City Attorney. Mr. Cochran stated that further discussion with City Officials would be a waste of time. Mayor Nee stated than the questions at hand were questions of fact and that he suggested that three or four persons could meet with Mr. Cochran and discuss these matters to ascertain the facts and report to the Council. Mr. Cochran agreed to most with the City Manager and other representatives of the Council at his convenience. Motion by Kirkham to for SSUM #58 to the Seconded by Sheridan. carried unanimously. PL=C WABINGI continue the public Dearing on the Assessment Roll neat Regular Council Meeting of September 20, 1965. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion The City Manager read the Notice of Bearing. no Mayor stated that this hearing is held upon the request of citizens one m utb previously for PA(Z 3 . construction of a storm *suer project in the area along Ries Crook Terrace. The Finance Director showed a map of the proposed drainage district. Mayor Ness asked the Consulting Engineer to discuss the construction project with the property macro present at the :Council Fleeting. Mrs Comstock stated that the purpose of discussing the improvement is to ascertain whether the improvement should be made. as explained that the cost of the proposed construction is estimated at $30,000 which costs amount to $1.12 per hundred square feat. Mt. Comstock stated that the existing facilities in the district have an estimated value of $ .63 per hundred square feet, making the total cost of the construction in the . district $1.75 per hundred :square feet. Mr. Comstock-stated that this value is below-the cost of newer storm seater construction projects. Mr. Comstock stated that his consulting firm reviewed this problem in 1962 and drew the map shown for the storm seater construction project in 1962. He stated that In 1962 the property owners requested an investigation of possible storm sewer. construction. W. Comstock stated that under present conditions water travels a long way to reach the catch basin. He stated that the Highway Department plans the location of catch basins such.that water travels in the right -of Bray no more than 700 feet before reaching a catch basin. He stated that where the water travels a great distance in the roads it erodes the street. Mayor Nee asked whether the proposed construction will relieve the load on the present at*= sewer facility. W. Comstock answered, "Yes." Mayor Nee asked 11r. Comstock whether the estimated coat Includes the cosh of repairing the streets. Mr. Comstock answered that the estimate includes the cost to repair the streets to the present condition. Mr. Comstock suggested that if the property owners wish to have the streets improved at this time the property owners may petition for saws. Mr. Jasumes Thayer, a representative of School District #14, was present at the Council Meeting. Mr. Thayer asked Mr. Comstock way he included part of the property of Hayes..School in the drainage district. Mr. Comstock answered that he discussed the drainage of the Hayes School grounds with the Architects designing the new school who have maps of the topography of the school grounds. He stated that the school grounds could be drained into this facility if the school would run a drainage bane from a catch basin in the school yard into the proposed new drainage line. Mr. Jars Thayer said that the school district has changed its plans; for the construction of Hayes School as a result of complaints of property careers on the adjacent property north of Hayes-School. He stated that the school will raise the. grade of the north and of the property to drain all of this water onto Mississippi Street. Mr. Thayer stated that this.construction will make a better playground at the Hayes School. Mr. Comstock stated that draining this water into Mississippi Street will result in a bad condition on Mists- sippi.Streetaince the Mississippi Street storm sewer caa not adequately handle this drainage. Mr. Comstock stated further that deletion of the .Hayes School grounds from this drainage district vill result in an increased assessment to property.owners in the drainage district of SS #77. A visitor to the Council Meeting asked why drainage is provided in the northeast corner of this distrIet. Mr. Comstock answered that the present Page 4 drainage line serving this part of the drainage district is a 6" line. 'He stated that this line -is substandard and it�is the intention of the consulting engineers to drain the water before it runs into the existing catch basin and prevent .the pile up of water at the existing catch basin. A Visitor to the Council Meeting who said that he lives on Monroe Street or . :Washington Street (other visitors at the Council Meeting assured his that he lived on Washington Street) stated that he has observed that there is more rainfall this year than there has been in other years. He stated that it.would be necessary to run water up hill in order to drain his lot into the new catch basins proposed for construction of 89#77. Mr. Comstock answered that it is the purpose of this construction to drain the water before it runs into the existing catch basin in order to prevent the .piling up of water in the vicinity of the existing catch basin. A Visitor to the Council Meeting, who did not give his name, asked how many .people petitioned for this improvement. Mayon Nee answered that six or eight people petitioned for the improvement. The Visitor answered that he believes there are ten times as many people against the construction of the improvement. A Visitor to the Council Meeting, who did not give his name, asked whetbor the storm sewer on Rice Creek Terrace which is presently in existence is inadequate. Mr. Comstock answered that the construction of the present atom sewer facility does not meet the criterion of the design based on a' • five year frequency of heavy rainfall. The Visitor asked whether the rainfall this year is higher than usual and'is included in the design criterion. Mr. Comstock answered that rainfall this year is heavier than average and that the rainfall of this year is not included in the design data. Mr. Comstock stated that he sees no reason: at the present time why the Improvement could not be finished by July, 1966 if the construction were begun now. A Visitor asked whether the present catch basins could be enlarged to handle the flow. Mr. Comstock answered that the line itself is too small to handle the flow and enlarging the catch basins will not be a solution to the problem. The Visitor asked whether it would be possible to enlarge the present line or put in a parallel line to drain the water. Mr. Comstock answered that the.presient line is built upon a private easement and that construction would involve negotiations Frith_ private parties and damage to the lawns and properties of private parties on this private easement. The Visitor asked why a new catch basin is not built adjacent to the existing catch basin with a dual line to drain the water away faster. Mr. Comstock answered that he does not wish to see the water carried a distance of more then 700 feet on the right -of -way since the water will compile as it drains a larger area to one catch basin. and erodes the street as it travels over greater distances. The Visitor asked why, since this facility has drained the high ground in past years, this construction should be necessary. Mr. Comstock answered that new construction is designed to upgrade the facility to existing standards. Mayor Nee stated that the low criterion of design used in construction of the existing facility has caused the present problems. Mayor Nee stated that it is better not to build any facility there to build a poor one@ Afro Comstock explained the construction and the workings of the present storm sewer facility. Mayor Nee stated that the Council recognizes that PAGE 5 It is a better idea to locate the storm sewer in the street easement than upon the private easement. A Visitor to the Council Meeting, who did not give his name, asked whether there was a storm sewer at the present time on 7th Street. Mr. Comstock stated that there is a storm sewer line on 7th Street but that it does not drain this area. Mr. Comstock explained that It drains the area along Bennett Drive and on Mississippi Street to the south and went of the district proposed for the construction of SS#77. A Visitor to the Council Meeting, who did not give his name, asked why Mr. Comstock did not have a better solution to the improvement of the existing storm sewer system instead of proposing construction of additional facilities. Mayor Nee stated that the consulting engineers responded to the decision of the Council to make a design based upon criteria specified by the Council. Mayor Nee stated that the Council does not order the improvement if broad support for the improvement does not exist, but the Council does have the authority to order the improvement if the improvement is in the interests of the community. Councilman Thompson stated that he has observed that the Council has not ordered improvements if there are a significant nawOer of objections and has deleted portions of improvements almost without exdeption when there are a significant number of objections to portions of an'. improvement. • Councilman Thompson stated that people have a responsibility to neighbors living on lower ground, for the water draining from their property onto the lower property. lager Nee stated that people on low ground have a legal right not to be flooded by water draining from the property of people living on high ground. Mayor Nee stated that courts have ruled that it is legal to assess people on high ground for construction of facilities draining water from the high grounds He stated that courts have ruled that the argument that there is no benefit to people on high ground for construction of drainage facilities to drain outer from laver ground has been ruled invalid.. Mayor Nee pointed out further that people living on high ground pay for water draining from their property into the catch basin. Councilman Wright stated that he wished to clarify the matter further. He used as an example the location of Columbia Heights on high ground adjacent to University Avenues Restated that Columbia Heights will pay the lion's share of the cost for construction of storm sewer project #12 even though Fridley is on the lower ground. He stated that Columbia Heights recognises that they °11 benefit by the drainage of water from the high ground into.tbe storm sewer system. Mayor Nee stated that the law reeds that the entire drainage district has a liability for the drainage problems. Mrs. Gerald Carlson, 568 Rice Creek Terrace, stated that the catch basins are located presently in her front and rear yard's. She stated that when it rains the water piles cep at the catch basin and floods her basement. She • stated that this happens at least once each year. She stated that she suggested to the Council that the proper solution-is the installation of two more catch basins to drain the water. Mrs. Carlson stated that earlier in the year Mrs. Brkel fell into the catch basin when it was undendned by the water and caved in. PACE b Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer whether construction of two additional catch basins would property drain the area. The City'Engineer stated that the consulting engineer does not believe this would be a proper drainage facility.. Councilman-.Wright stated that the-City Engineer is concerned with erosion of.the street. Mr..James Thayer stated that he paid for the con -. stractiou of storm sewer services to his property before, when he paid for the line draining the Christie Addition. Mr. Comstock stated that there is no connection of any drainage facility in the drainage district proposed for 53 #77 to the drainage facility in Christie Addition. Mr. James Thayer stated that the statement of Mr. Comstock is not true.and that he has paid for the construction of storm sewer facilities in Christie Addition. Councilman Kirkham stated that he does not believe that Mr. Comstock and his consulting engineering firm investigated the proposal for the installation of two additional catch basins. Mr. Kirkham stated further that he does sot believe that the Consulting Engineer considered asked the developer who Installed the original drainage facilities to pay for the construction of new facilities since the drainage facilities he installed have been found to be inadequate. Councilman Thompson stated that he dished to inquire concerning construction of a facility with two catch basins. He stated that he thought perhaps this makeshift solution should be tried for a year or two to see whether the problem would be relieved thereby. Mayor Nee stated that the present Public Hearing is for consideration of the proposal of the Consulting Engineer and if the City wishes'to consider construction of a makeshift solution it would be necessary to hold.another hearing. Mayor Nee stated that the property owners will have to bear the expense and trouble if a substantially degraded storm sewer facility is built. Councilman Kirkham stated that he does not believe it is fair to call the proposed construction with only two catch basins -a makeshift solution. He stated that he would wish to ask Mr. Comstock to snake an additional study of the drainage problem based on this suggestion by Mrs. Carlson. Mayor Nee declared the hearing- closed. Notion by Kirkham to instruct the Consulting Engineer to restudy the problem of draining the water from this drainage district, to suggest to the Consulting Engineer the use of the alternate methods suggested by the property owners, and instruct the Consulting Engineer to bring a new report based upon these aMestione and other alternate suggestions to the Council. There was no second to this motion. Mr. Comstock stated that his Consulting Engineering firm has studied this problem for several years. He stated that he has followed the instructions of the Council in making this new design and before he would restudy the design based upon what he believes to be inadequate design criteria, he wishes the Council to define the criteria upon which he should make a design of the storm sewer system. Mr. Comstock stated that he does not want the Councils in future years saying that his design was inadequate. • Motion by Kirkham to refer design of the storm sewer facilities in the drainage district of SS#77 to the Suburban Engineering Company. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.— PA(Z 7 i POSLSC HEARING: ASSSSSMNT ROLL - SSW #71: The City Manager read the Notice of Hearing. Mayor Nee delineated the drainage district for the visitors to the Council Meeting. He explained the purpose of the hearing, and the manner in which the assessment roll me made. Mayor Nee stated that if visitors to the Council Meeting wish to contest the assessment, they must make their objections to the assessment knompa and this is the purpose of time Public Hearing. Mayor Nee stated that the City has available to the property owners, the aammmts of the assessment if they wish.to ask for these amounts at this hearing. Mr. Charles Swanson, 312 Rice Creek Terrace Northemst, asked why the area along Rice Creek Terrace between 67th Avenue Northeast and University Avenue was included in the drainage district when the water does not ran onto the Highway. Mayor Nee and Councilman Wright informed Mr. Manson that the Minnesota Higay Department to paying more than half the cost of construction of the storm ewer facility. They stated that property owners are paying a very small. mount for the construction of these storms sewer facilities. Mayor Nee informed Mr. Swanson that if he wishes to contest the assessment he should give his name and his address. MT. Charles Swanson stated that he is the owner of Lot 1, Block 2 in Rice Creek Terrace. go stated that he wishes to object on the grounds that he does not receive any benefit from the construction and that the water on his property drains • into the ground before it runs off onto Trunk Highway #47. Mayor Nee asked whether there were any other objections to the Assessment Roll:. Mrs. Ranco Schuur, 401 Mississippi Street,asked if it is true that they paid for construction of a storm sewer system three or four years previously. She stated that this storm sewer system built three or four years previously does not work. Mayor Nee informed Mrs. Schuur that the property owners were not assessed for the storm sewer construction to which she refered, since the storm server construction was not finished until the present time. He stated that assessments for that smrm sewer construction are included in the present assessment. Mayor Nee asked if there were any other objections to this storm sewer assessment. There were no ether objections. Mayor Nee declared the hearing closed. PUBLIC BARING: AlSSBSSH M ROLL - ST. 1% 4-1: The City Manager read the Notice of Hearing. Mayor Nee explained the purpose of holding the hearing. He stated that the City has available the amounts of the assessment for the property owners. Mayor Nee stated that if the property owners wish to contest the assessment they should state their objections at this hearing. Mayor Nee announced the first portiemn of Street Project 1964 -1 for consideration. • 77TH WAY NORTMST FROM EAST RZVEB RQAD EAST TO TH$ MR QAD RM., Mayor Nee asked whether any property owners had questions or objections *ancervi,ng the assessment. '.mere tjere no rib jections to the proposed assessment. PAC E 8 • 2' NUET FROM 57A AVE M NCMTWAST TO 58TH AVW= N s Mayor Nee asked if there were any questions or objections concerning the assessment. There were no objections to the proposed assessment. 75TH AMM M FRCM BACCH AVM= TO LAXESIDE ROAD: .. .ter • w.�.����. , Mayor Nee asked whether there were any objections or any questions concerning the assessment. Mrs. Laurence Conrad, 7440 Bacon Drive, asked whether their property, same being Lot 9, Auditor's Sub - Division #129, was included in the gasesement. She stated that construction had been extended over part of this property. The City Engineer stated that the construction was contracted to extend only as far as the right -of -way but may heive extended 10 or 15 feet over the boulevard and that this property was not included in the construction project. Mayor Nee asked whether there were any other questions or objections to the proposed assessment. There were no objections to the assessment. WAMIEW DRIVE FROM TRUNK HIGHWAY # 65 TO THE WEST MW: Mayor Nee asked whether there were any questions or objections concerning the assessment. There were no objections to the assessment. WOMY LAM SO= FROM THE CUL-DE -SAC: Mayor Nee asked whether there were any questions or objections concerning the assessment. There were no objections to the assessment. TAYLOR STREET FRCM TRMM HIGHWAY #65: Mayor Nee asked whether there were any questions or objections concerning the assessment. There were no objections to the assessment. Sn=T FRC K BAST BEVBR ROAD TO RAM TSAsCd� A Visitor to the Council hbmting,mho did not_give his name, stated that part of the construction of Ironton Street is not dieted. Mayor Nee stated that this assessment concerns the part completed between Bast River Road and Ashton Avenue. The City Engineer stated that the remainder of Itoiton Street was deleted fun the project. The Visitor stated that he believes the road should be paved to industrial standards. He stated that the propezrtj east of Ashton Avenue is zoned for commercial property and that cesmeseial development will bring heavy traffic onto the street. Be stated that the street should be designed to carry a also toe axle loasd. He stated that if the street is not paved for this load it will deteriorate and fill,with.Pot holes. He stated that he is being assessed $8.70 per front foot which is a higher figure than other streets included in Street Project 1964 -1. Be stated that he believes that Ironton Street should be a State Aid road or that tax relief should be afforded to the property owners for the use ofd* road for commercial purposes. The Visitor stated further that he believes that paving the road will serve to attract industry to the City of Fridley and a paved road will provide more attractive commercial property. He • stated that the heavy traffic which would be brought to the road when Industry locates on the land east of Ashton Avenue will make it necessary to provide a State Aid road. The Visitor stated that considering the cost of curb and gutter and the cost of paving the street, the construction cost of Ironton Street is PA(Z 9 unnecessarily high. He stated that there is little grading on Ironton • Street and he asked shy the cost of construction is higher than other construction costa. The City Engineer stated.that it was necessary to acquire an easement along Ironton Street and divert the Creek from its previous location in order to build the road. He stated that it was necessary to excavate a am creek bed, to provide a base for the road, and additional culverts under the road. The Visitor asked whether the property was assessed when the culvert was installed on Hugo Street, Councilman Wright stated that the installation of the culvert an Hago Street was for maintsnoe and properties are not assessed for maintenance. The Visitor stated that the paint factory benefits from the construction of Ironton Street even though Ironton Street is not constructed as far as that property. He stated that people traveling to the paint factory have only a small stretch of said street to travel over and may use the paved street for the rest of the distance. The Visitor stated that if Ironton Street were extended to the railroad track*, the paint factory would have to pay for construction of the.road at industrial rates. Mayor Nee stated that the City hopes to confine heavy traffic going'to industrial properties east of Ashton Avenue to Ashton Avenue and 79th Way. Mayor Nee stated that Ironton Street is not designed for the load, but that Ashton Avenue and 79th Wy will be State Aid Streets. The City Manager stated that nine ton axle loads will not be permitted on Ironton Street from March 15th to May 15th. Mayor Nee stated.that construction of the road reflects the actual cost of construction. • Mr. and Mrs. L. Dailey were present at the Council Meeting and Mr. Dailey asked why the assessment against his property was based on a high front footage. He stated that his property does not front Ironton Strut but fronts on East River Road. The Finance Director and the City Attorney examined the property of Mr.. Dailey, the same being 430 Ironton Street, and the City Attorney stated that he believes that Mr. Dailey has a justifiable objection. Mayor Nee informed Mr. Dailey that it is the unanimous judgment of the Council that an error was made in computing the assessment against this property, that the assessment should have been computed for 1/3 of the front footage on Ironton Street and the entire assessment computed at $9.18 per front foot. Mayor Nee asked whether these were any other objections or questions concerning the proposed. assessment on Ironton Street. There were no other objections to the assessment. Mayor Nee declared the hearing closed. PUBLIC mAR71QGt 1966 BDDC,MT: The City Manager provided copies of the budget to interested visitors at the Council Meeting. The City Manager stated that the budget pas dram based upon requests of the department heads. The City Manager stated that he did not receive some of these requests from the department heads until • the middle of July due to the spring emergencies which occupied their time. The City Mager stated that sone of the requests of the department herds are out of order for a growing City the site of the City of Fridley. Us City Massger stated, iprther, that he pared the requests by $80,000, slat with the Council -to consider the budget, and together with the Council cut an additional $32,000.00 from the budget. The City Manager stated that* MACE 10 • $32,656 amount (the City's share for the construction of traffic signals an Trunk Highway #47 and Thank High vay #65)u w also deleted from the budget. The City 1lanager stated that some items cannot be curt from the budget such as the one mill for Firearm's Relief and a charge for the second and final payment for construction of'the addition to the Fire Station. The City Manager stated that the mill rate proposed by the Administration and the Council for general operating funds was 32 mills for expenditures of $470,543.00. The City Manager stated that some levies are required by Inv and sass are required by previous commitments over and above the general operating funds.. He stated that some of these levies are for the Public Employees Retirement Association, the Firem n's Relief Fetid, the Civic Center Bonds, the Park Bands, and the Special Assessment Bonds. He stated that these costs mount to a levy of 9 mills for a total budge levy of 43.3654 mills. fhe City Manager stated that he asked the assessor to take the evaluation of his former home and compute the amount of the increased assessment against the home for the increase in the budged for 1966. The City Manager stated that the assessor informed him that the increase in the budget. would amount to $5.11 against his property. The City Manager stated that other governmental entities such as the school district and the County government levy against the property owners iu the .City of Fridley, and these levies are a great deal higher than the levy made by the City. He stated that costs for one of his children to attend school in the first • feu days of school amounted to $18.00 over and above the property tames paid to the school district. Mayor Nee stated that the proposed increase of 3 mills is the remainder after cuts of other proposed increases. Mayor Nee stated that cuts in the budget effect a reduction in the services the City provides to property owners. He stated that cuts will reduce the expansion of the Police Department and the Police department is not expanding as fast as the City expands. Mr. William Tanco was present at the Council Meeting and stated that be is happy see that the Council and-tba City Manager reduced the budgets of the QtpUrAP Department, and the treets Department. He asked whether it would be possible to further reduce the budgets of Parks and Recreation. Ire City Manager replied that the Parks and Recreation budgets were made by Citizen groups and the Citisen groups indicated ways in which they believed their budgets could be cut without hurting program of larks and Playgrounds or Recreation. The City Manager said he made these cuts and discussed them with the Director. Mr. Wilbur Whitmore asked why the total budget of the City proposed for 1966 is higher than that proposed for 1965. The City Manager answered that a goad share of the increase is the amount of State Aid Funds which the City proposes to spend in 1966 amounting to more than $80,000. The City Manager also stated that the City will have same animal increased costs such as increased wages is Ilse with other Twin City Hanicipalities. The • City Manager pointed out that most budgets of Municipalities in the United States spend 65% of fends for personal services, whereas, the City of Fridley is spending only 50 % of the budget for Personal services. The City Manager stated that school district levies are considerably higher than PACE 11 • City levies and suggested that the Taxpayers Association contact the school district and County concerning holding the line on taxes, rather than the City. Mr. Tonto stated that the Taxpayers Association has to start cutting taxes on the local level for the City Government before it can.ask other goverimente to cut taxes. The City Manager asked why the City should always redw4 its services to the property owners when other -governments never saw to be asked to do so. The City Manager stated that the down payment on the purchase of a fire truck vas deleted from the budget and that this-deletion could result in loss of a possible decrease in Insurance rates to residents in the City of Fridley larger than the amount of taxes required to purchase the fire truck. Mr. Wilbur Whitmore stated that the Parks and Recreation Departments are receiving.funds amounting to 10% of the budget. He stated that he believe* the City cannot afford to spend 10% of revenue on Parks and Recreation. The City Manger stated that he has already cost the Parks and Recreation budget by $89245. Moo Whitmore stated that the Police Department might, If It were of adequate, size, save a life or reduce the amount of crime. He stated that parks and recreations programs may reduce juvenile deliquency problems,-but that $96,000 for the parks program is too high. He stated that he doubts if othat Cities spend such a large percentage of their funds for Parks and Recreation. Councilman Wright stated that the standard amount which the average Municipality in the United States spends for Parks and Recreation is 22%, whereas, the City of Fridley is spending only 10% for Parke and Recreation. Councilman Wright stated, further, that the City of Fridley has only half the amount of park acreage ax. 31-A as a standard for a City the stse of the City of Fridley. Councilman Wright stated, further, that during the past summer 400 children took part in the Recreation program, 400 children took part in the day camps, and approximately 400 children took part in the swimming program sponsored by the Recreation Department. Mr. Tonco stated that be believes the construction of the Moore Lake Beach House wasted $20,000 of City funds. He stated that he believes the water of Monte Lake is salty enough to float an egg. He stated that he is opposed to the construction of the tennis court on Moore Lake Beach and that he finds that construction of a bath house on Moore Lake Beach was unnecessary, since the children will continue to use Moore Lake as a bathroom whether the bath- house exists or not. Councilman Wright stated that he Most challenge the statment of Mr. Tonco,,tfiet the Health Inspector makes periodic checks of the water of Moore Lake and has found that the water is not salty but that It is acceptable and completely safe for swiuuuuafng. Mr. Tonto stated that the budget of Parke and Recreation oust be cut. Mrs. Ranco Schuur stated that Urban Renewal will cost money and asked the Council to discuss the expenses of Urban Renewal. Councilmen, Thompson stated that he was a wmaer of the Parks Committee and would Like to hear suggestions concerning cuts for the Parks budget. Mrs Tonro stated that he would have opposed the construction of the beach . house had he been aware that the construction was planned. Mayor Nee Informed Mr. Tonco that he was present at several of the Council Hastings when construction of the beach louse was discussed. Cou nclUan Sheridan stated that rather than taking any specific items out of the budget, he would rather see definite dollar amounts cut from the budget and allow the PAGE 12 • department heads to reduce the budget by these dollar amounts as the department heads are closer to the working of the various departments and can rework the budgets in a more suitable per. A Visitor, Mrs. Murray Straps, stated that she did not want the Council to think that the Parks and Recreation budget should be cat. She stated that people have a lot of time to spend and that it is expensive to go to parks In other cities or to use recreational facilities in other Cities. Sbe stated that she would like to see the Parks and Recreation budget left as it is or increased. Councilman Wright stated that the Council spent five hours considering cuts and cut items from the budget which were not luxuries. He stated that the Council.succeeded in reducing the budget by several mills. He stated these cuts were often mode by making very small cuts which amounted to no an than a tenth of a mill at a time, after making quite a few cuts the budget had not been substantially reduced. He stated that it was a painful process to delete some of these items from the budget. Mr. Tonco stated that he favored the suggestion of Mr. Sheridan for cutting the budget. Councilman Kirkham stated that across -the -board cuts Mere made In various departmental requests in order to reduce the budget to the given amomnts. The City Manager stated that he does not believe that people of the City would want this cuts. He stated that the level of services for 1966 is planned to be the same as that of 1965 even though the population of the City will probably increase in 1966. He stated that the increase in popu- lation and consequent reduction in the level of services will probably not be satisfactory to the majority of the people. The City Manager asked wby the Taxpayers Association did not advocate cutting the budgets of other govern- mental entities rather than further cutting the budget of the City. Mr. Toaco replied that the Taxpayers Association has to start cutting the budget of the City, and that it can work best to cut the budget of the local Government. Mrs. Sue Miskowic vas present at the Council Meeting. She stated that she believes the demands for cutting the budget made by the Taxpayers Association vere unjust. She said she wished to comend the Council for their work in drawing up the budget, and stated that she does not believe anyone should find fault with the budget unless he has studied the budget page by page and asked for explanations of items he does not understand. She stated that she believes it un)st to cut the budget of the Parks and Playgrounds Sub - Committee and the Recreation Commission. Mr. Whitmore stated that the Taxpayers Association would like to study the budget for some additional time before the Council adopts it. Motion by Thompson to continue to the Regular Cowell Meeting of September 20, 1965 consideration of the 1966 budget. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the mption carried unanimously. BILLBOARD AND SIGNS ORDINANCE (TABYBD 7119/65)t • Mayor Nee stated that the proposed Billboard and Sign Ordinance had been referred to the Chamber of Commerce and League of Women Voters for comelderstion. He stated that the League of Women Voters provided the Council with a letter listing their recommendations concerning the Billboard and Signs Ordinance. PAGE 13 • Mr. Leonard Inderlee was present at the Council Heating representing the Chamber of Commerce. Be stated that the retail committee of the Chamber of Commerce steadied the proposed ordinance and wished to add amendments to the ordinance which were included in the Billboard and Signs Ordinance used in the City of Cana Rapids. He stated that this amendment to Chapter 56.03 would provide that there be no annual fee for signs attached to buildings advertising the sale of services or products sold or provided Inside the building. Be stated that the Chamber of Commerce also questioned whether existing sigmas mist be made to conform to the setbacks required by this proposed ordinance. Mayor Nee informed Mr. Inderlee that under the Constitution, the City cannot enforce the lam upon signs built before the ordinance was passed. Mr. Inderlee stated that the Chamber agrees with the setback and height requirements for these new signs, but that in regard to signs located in C -1 and C-IS districts the Chamber believes that the height of a sign an a building is not sufficient to provide good visibility for these signs. He stated that some of these signs may be located on top of a building, In which case, a greater height would be necessary with a greater sebaek before the signs wom1d be adequately visible. Mr: Inderlee stated that the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce will meet on Thursday, Septemaber 16th, and would like to discuss the ordinance with a member of the Council. Councilman Wright stated that he believes it would be appropriate to • include in the ordinance regulating signs and billboards a provision making It a misdemeanor for persons not owning signs to destroy or deface signs. He stated that he believes this would improve the tone,level and conduct of election campaigns and reduce the destruction of some of the Candidate signs which has occurred during the past election. Motion by Sheridan to receive the comments and recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce concerning the Signs and Billboard Ordinance and ask the Administration to revise the Ordinance to include the recommendations of the Chamber of Commerce and League of Women Voters. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE #308 AHKNDIXG CHAPTER 46- Mayor Nee explained the purpose of the proposed ordinance and stated that the first reading of the ordinance was accepted on August 16, 1965. Motion by Wright to lvaive second reading of the ordinance, to adopt the ordinance and publish sauce. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ORDUMM CLASSiFYINC: ADDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICTS tTA_BZBD ALWO5) - The City Manager read the proposed Ordinance. Mayor Nee explained the purpose of the proposed Ordinance. • Notion by Wright to accept the Ordinance classifying additional zoning districts upon first reading. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a roll call vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. J PACE 14 The City Manager explained the purpose of the proposed ordinance and Illustrated the land vacation on the City map. The City Engineer stated that the aquisition of an easement is holding up construction of street improvements on.8iverview Terrace. The City Engineer stated that the preliminary report on the storm sever and a hearing will also be required before Riverview Terrace can be improved. Motion by Wright to waive the first reading and adopt the Ordinance vacating portions of the street easement in Johnson's, 8iverlane Addition. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a roll call vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unaniuously. A tT WITH AMIMCAN OBI. CWANY = :TABLED 8123/65) s The City Attorney stated that he examined the City Charter and found that the City will need to write ,a franchise agreement with American Oil Company for the location of the American Oil Company- pipeline in the City streets. He stated that an agreement has been drawn with the American oil Company. The Charter provides for adoption of a franchise by the passage of an ordinance and requires a Public bearing for the adoption of the Ordinance. The City Manager asked the Council whether they wished to set a date for the hearing for the Ordinance. • Councilman Wright stated that vilum a City grants a franchise the City receives goods and services in return for the franchise. He stated that there are no goods or services delivered to the City as a result of the location of the pipeline through the City. Councilman Wright stated that he sees no reason why the American oil Company should be allowed to run the pipeline through the City of Fridley for nothing. Councilman Wright stated that he believes negotiations should be conducted with the American Oil Company to d)tain a consideration for the benefit of the City. The City Engineer stated that the American oil Company can acquire an easement from private persons and that coats of the American oil Company to relocate the pipeline will affect the cost to the Minnesota Highway Department for construction of Trunk Highway #47 south of University Avenue. The City Engineer stated that the City needs to cooperate with American Oil Company to have the pipeline moved in order not to delay construction of Trunk Highway #47. be stated that the Americana 011 Company is not anxious to relocate the pipeline and if they fail to relocate the pipeline it will delay construction of Trunk Highway #47. The City Engineer state4 further, that the American Oil Company owaa an easement and that the Minnesota Highway Department has condemned the easement of the American oil Company in order to construct Trunk Hi*vay #47. Councilman Sheridan stated that he believes it would be vLse to have the City Engineer determine whether the City will need to locate streets upon • easements of the American Oil Company in the future. He stated that should the City need to obtain an easement from the A=;:Ican Oil Company in the future* the American Oil Company could charge the•City a high price for the easement. The City Engineer stated that this is the last day the Council ei� 2� ' SEWER9 WATER AND STURK SEM 114PROYMM PROJECT N0. 67 aa� assesss�t Aoll D 1-2 -3 D MORE LSE 2ND MMM AND LMUM AIR um EAST Add t,�sNB GARUS� jh�D Lot GARDEi+TB Bloc•; u� 1 1 109000 56,3.00- 2 1 90,800 532.14 3 1 80900 483.27 4 1 9,500 c -) 515.85 5 1 80,725 (partial(1 -;,e) 473;77 6 7 1 1 79000 50595 partialhf l-,d') 380;10 iYartial 303,81 8 1 109800 (partisll 586.64, 9 1 91,350 (part) 507.71 10 1 10,400 partial) 76.02 (partdua) S rr 11 1 990 53076 1 2 119250 620088 S Tr- 2 2 329500 67$.75 S eM , 3 2 99750 coq -tee 529.43 s,T. ` o. y 2 1,500 (partial) 91.45 5 2 19000 (partial �� -P�) 54:30 um NTT iR 4 1 750 (partial) 40.73 34 3 2 p 475 (partial Ai-. , - P. - ,,) 134039 35 3 90150 (partial) 496.85 36 3 17,400 944 ,182 1 1 9,450 513414 2 1 9,225 .500:92 3 l 15x150 822,64 4 1 9*400 (partial) 510.42 6 1 375 ; ti l . . -, 20.36 7 1 400 a� -�i�L� 21072. to Nt�TALANND LAK�iISpl ipartial O 2 1 3,680 199,82 --- 3 1 39000 partial. 162090 4 1 39000 partial 162090 5 1 19800 partial 97,74 6 1 750 partial) 40,73 AM FIRST 2 ADD. 1 S00 (partial) 97.7 "AL 210,160 C / ���� $11,410.63 Cost: $U,406,69 T 210,140 sq. ft $5.43 per 100 sq. ft. PAGE 15 . could consider this matter if they did not want the Minnesota Highway Department to delay construction of Trunk Highway #47. Councilman. Wright stated that there is a question what consideration the City can obtain in return for providing the American Oil Company with an easement in the City streets. Councilman Wright suggested that the City Attorney negotiate with the American Oil Company to obtain a service char[,* of $1.00 per year for the life of the franchise and then negotiate for a higher charge when the franchise runs out. The City Attorney stated that the franchise may run for a considerable period of time before running out. Motion by Sheridan to instruct the City Attorney to prepare the documents necessary to grant a franchise to the American Oil Company for relocation' of the pipeline in the City of Fridley including a charge of $140 per year to the American Oil Company for use of the City easement. Seconded by Wright. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. the Finance Director explained that there are two tolls for part of the assessment of SW&SS #67. Be stated that the Council must choose betwesa the two rolls. Mayor Nea stated that the Council should first make a motion to receive letters of objection from Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Smith, Mr. and We. Lewis Jehason, and Mr. and Mrs. Zylka concerning the • assessment for SW&SS#67. The Mayor said these persons object to the assessment on the grounds that they do not benefit from the construction. Mr. Wayne Holte was present at the Council Meeting and stated that he rAm Lot 23 on Hill Crest Drive, He stated that this matter was brought up two years ago during the preliminary hearing for the improvement. He stated that he discussed the matter with Mr. Olson, member of the consult1w; engineering firm of Comstock and Davis, and asked his to come to the Intersection of Woody Lane and Hillcrest Drive and check the water flow. He stated that Mr. Olson checked the water flow several time and farad that water does not go down Woody Lane. He stated that he observe(, the water for several years and found that water goes dawn Hill Crest Drive to Central. Motion by Sheridan to receive the letter from Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Smith, Mr. and Mrs. Johnson, and Mr. and Mrs. Zylka objecting to assessment for MUM. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being, no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ]action by Sheridan to delete the alternate Assessment Roll including Moore Lake Hills Addition in area D-1, 2, 3 from the Assess mit Roll and adapt Resolution #156.1965 confirming the'Assessment Roll for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer. Project #67 tacorporating the assessment spread far area D-1, 2, 3 provided to the Council. Seconded by KiridLen. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. RESO tMOR G ASSSSSN= ROLL - SS&SW #58, 'fAM 8/23/65': Motion by Wright to table to the Regular Council Meeting of September 20, 1965 consideration of the Resolution Confivoing Assessment Roll for PAOR 16 construction project S$6B M. Seconded by KirTchm. Upon a voice vote, • there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. G1B :PHILLIPS STATION WILDING * MM Mr. Virgil Herrick was present at the Council Ming and stated that he understood the City contacted Phillips Patrols= Company with regard to construction of the building .along University Avenue and found no particular conflict with the construction schedule or location of the service road. He stated that Phillips Patrols= Company is willing to delay construction of the building for 60 days to provide the City with time to consider construction of the service road. He stated that Mr. Schuur wants to obtain a Building Permit at this time for construetion of the service station. Mr. Herrick stated that he has a copy of the plot plan previously submitted to the Council for construction of the service station and if the copy furnished to the City has been misplaced, Phillips Petroleum Company will be glad to submit a new copy to the City. Motion by Wright to grant the request of Mr..Schuur for a Building Permit for construction of a Phillips 66 Service Station at 5669 University Avenue Northeast. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION : GRAVES - SUNRAY D8 SERVICE 8TA?ION: Mr. Ward Gronfield was present at the Council Meeting representing Ragene- and Clarence Graves. Mr. Gronfield stated that construction of this service station is similar to the construction of the Phillips 66 Station. He asked the Council to waive considerationof the construction plawns by the Building Board and the Safety Committee and grant a Building Permit for construction of the oil station immediately. Mayor Nee stated that construction of the service station is referred to the Safety Committee In order to establish the access to the service station. The Citjr Manager ,Mated that the Building Board had not been-notified-of the next meeting since there were no items on"the agenda of the Building Board, but that he mould have his secretary notify members of the Building Board of a, meeting and if a quorum could be obtained the request of Clarence and Eugene Graves could be considered by the Building Board on September Sth and by the Safety Committee on September 15th. He stated that the Council could then consider the matter on September 20th. Mr. Gronfield stated that this is agreeable to his clients. Councilman Wright stated that he believes the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority should be asked to consider the request for a Building Permit as a matter of procedure, since this land is included in the Urban Renewal program for the south University area, to see if the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority has any objections tar the construction of the service station. Motion by Kirkham to refer the request of Clarence and Eugene Graves for a Building Permit for construction of a Sunray = oil Station at 5701 Uaiver- • sity Avenue Northeast to the Administration for processing, and reconsider the request at the Regular Council Ming of September 20, 1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • PAC$ 17 ft Mr. Marchiafava was not present at the Council Meeting. Mayor Nee asked the City Manager vhether the City has plans of the construction proposed by Mt. Marehiafava. The City Manager answered that he does not have these plans. Councilman meson stated that most applicants for Building Permits support their application with more than a request. He stated that he believes the Council should ask for more information before considering the request of Mr. Marchiafava. Motiin by Kirkham for the approval of the Building permit application of Mr. Marehiafava to reconstruct his property at 6001/6005 University Avenue Northeast to its original condition. Mayor Nee stated that the motion failed for lack of a second. Councilman Wright stated that in a similar situation the City obtained from the property owner an agreement to improve his property above the original condition. He stated that perhaps the Council could obtain a similar agreement from this property owner. He suggested that the matter be put aside until the Council can obtain more information concerning the request. The Council took no action upon this matter. - '%n I YJ hh I4 - Councilman Wright stated that he is reluctant to recQwend granting the request of Ardis Christianson for a Building Permit to repair these properties. Councilman Wright stated that these properties are mar surplus structures, that they are not mounted on footings, that the crawl space under the structure is an open mid hole, the buildings are maintained badly, the buildings are unsanitary, unsafe, and unhealthy. Councilman Wright stated that the vast majority of the people in the area want the buildings cleaned up. Councilman Wright stated that he does not believe the owner of these buildings would be allowed to move them Into Fridley under the present ordinances. He stated that he believes these buildings are as close to a definition of blight as nay buildings is the City of Fridley. Councilman Wright stated, farther, that informtioa given to the Council indicates that the ordinance concerning fire rated rooms where furnaces are located needs to be amended. Com oilman Kirkham stated that the report concerning the structures shaves that there are no gross hazards existing in the buildings. Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Bloom, 5611 - 6th Street Northeast, were present at the Council Meeting and Mr. Bloom stated that the Building Inspector told him the Buildings are sub -code, hazardous and should be demolished under the Dangerous Building Statutes. He stated that he has made several eamplaints to the City concerning the condition of the buildings. He • stated that the Building Inspector informed him that the buidings were damaged more than 50% of the value before the storm and the buildings - cannot be brought up to Code. He stated that the lawn surrounding the PAGE 18 buildings has only been cut once during the entire year. Mr. Bloom stated further that the buildings have small living units, no basemmnts, no wash room, and just a small kitchen. He stated that in one of the building units a family with six children is living. Councilman Wright stated that he found reports of the building contra- dictory. Notion by Wright to table consideration of the request of Ardis Christiansen for * :wilding Permit . to repair the structures at 5612/5616 and 5618/5620 - 6th Street Northeast, that the Council undertake condemnation of these buildings and of the duplexes at 5600/5602 and 5606 15608 - 6th Street Northeast under the Dangerous Building Ordinances and Statutes. The motion was not seconded. Motion by Wright to deny the request of Ardis Christianson for a Building Peat to make repairs to the structures at 561215614 and 5618/5620 - 6th Street Northeast. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Notion by Wright that the City undertake condemnation of the duplexes located at 5600/56020 5606/5608, 5612/5614, 5618/5620 - 6th Street Northeast under the Dangerous Building Statutes. Second by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. POSTING OF ABLE STREET FOR TWO HOUR PARKING (Ti4BUW 88/_2/655,, 8/16/65): • Councilman Kirkham stated that examination of the police log concerning violations along Able Street shored there is no need for a two hour parking Ordinance on this portion of Able Street. Motion by Kirkham to table indefinitely consideration of posting Able Street for two hour parking. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PLANNING CCK41SSIOH MtBMG MINUTES - AUGUST 26, 1965, Mr. Booth was present at the Council Meeting. He stated that even though these properties are coned for general multiple dwellings, he cannot sell the properties for this purpose, but that he can sell the properties for construction of single family dwellings. The Council examined drawings of the proposed lot split. Notion by Wright to approve Lot Split #65 -07 of Lot 2, Block I1, 8=11ton's Addition to Mechanicsville as shown one the Plat filed with the City. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the mUou carried unanimously. LOT SPLIT gat ST L.S. , #65 -08. (Z88LD D. M=: PART OF iAT 15 Ai�MI • .��. rw w ..nrn.w r...w.�wwr..�.r SUS - DIVISION #129 : Notion by Kirkham to approve Lot Split #65 -08 of part of Lift 15 in Aenditor'a Sub - Division #129 as shown on the plat filed with the City. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays,-the motion carried unanimously. El PAGE 19 The City Manager read the motion of the Planning Commission aooaera fin g the proposed easement vacation. The City Manager asked the City Attorney whether the vacation .r"Gifte a Public Searing. The City Attorney answer "Yes." Councilman Sheridan asked why the City should reduce the also of the utility easement when the City on other occasions paid money to obtain a larger utility easement. Councilman Sheridan skated that in the future the City might used the utility easement. The City Manager replied that apparently the property owner needs the land on the easement to build upon the property. Councilman Wright stated that he would suggest the City allow the property oerner to build upon the easenent at his oust risk and simply state the City has no objections to the proposal of the property saner to build upon the easement. Mayor Nee asked why the request was mode by the Building Inspeator. The City Manager stated that the property owner may have asked the Building Inspector Whether vacation of part of the easement could be obtained. The City Manager stated that the request was considered by the Plats and Sub - Divisions Sub- Como:ittee and the Street and Utilities Sub - Committee. He stated that these committees reesaamenaded that the Utility Easement Vacation be granted. Councilman • Wright stated that he would like to have the consulting engineer examine the request and make recommendations to the Council concerning the same. Motion by Thompson to table to the Regular Council Meeting of September 209 1963 consideration of Vacation of the Utility Basement in Blocks I and 28 �r Tyndale Builders 7th Addition. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Wright left the meeting at 12:27 A.M. The City Manager read the motion of the Planing Cmdesten reaaomaadtng adoption of the Ordinance. In City Manager read the Ordinance. Motion by Sheridan to adopt the Ordinance upon second reading and publish eerie. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a roll call vote, there being no usys, the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Wright returned to the Council Meeting at 12 :30 A.M. • Mr. Lavine and Mr. Aawrysh were present at the Council Meeting. Mr. Levine showed the plan of the City Center building renewal project to the Council and the location of the rezoning drawn on the plan to the Council. M@yos Nee asked Mr. Comstock whether there were any nearer problems on 64th Avenue Northeast which the Council should consider in connection with the request of Mr. Levine to rezone this property. Mr. Comstock stated that under the 0 PAGE 20 original zoning plan of the City there to no problem. Mr. Hawrysh discussed with the Council his plant for the construction of an apartment building upon this property. He oTlained how he plans to meet the requirements of the City Ordinances, prrovide storage space for the occupants of the apartment buildings and provide parking space for the occupants. The City Manager asked Mr. Hotrysh whether he discussed the drainage problems of the parking lot and the additional drainage added to the watershed by the construction of the building with the City Engineer. Mr. Hourysh answered, "Yes." Mr. Ranrysh showed the Council the site plan of the proposed construction of the apartment buildings. Cowncilmaa Sheridan asked Mr. Comstock if the sanitary sewer will handle the additional load provided by the apartment buildings. Mr. Comstock answered that he does not know. Mir. Hawrysh stated that he has not had my trouble with the drainage on his property, in the past. Cocmcilmm Wright stated that property owners to the south of the property of Mr, Hawrysh have complained about the capacity of the sanitary sewer. The City Engineer stated that the sanitary sewer system serving these apartments goes to the lift station and construction of the additional apartment building will provide an additional load to the lift station. Councilman Thompson stated, that property owners living South of 64th Avenue contend that the apartment buildings contribute huge amounts of sewage to the sanitary sewer and that the sewer is.inadegnate to handle these accounts. He stated that the Council needs to be sure that adequate facilities will be provided for handling the sanitary sewage. Mr. Hawrysh stated that he originally applied In February, 1965 for rezoning of this land and a permit for construction of the apartment buildings. He stated that he wishes to begin construction of the apartment buildings immediately. He stated that in February, 1965 the Council promised to set the date for a Public Searing for rezoning of this land. Mayor Nee stated that it is still necessary to hold a Public Hearing to rezone the land and ascertain whether property owners have any objections to the rezoning. Mr. Hawrysh said he talked to the neighbors in the area and 799. of the people in the area have no objections to rezoning this property for another apartment building. Mayor No* asked Mr. Hawrysh whether he vmld meet with the Building Board to discuss his plans for construction of the apartment building. Mr. 8swrysh answered, "Yes." The Council took no action upon this matter. LU.M NG BOARD M113TING M NU 9S - AUGUST 25, 1961: Me. Betgloff, Mr. Fen Olson and Mr. Lloyd Bush there present at the Council Beating representing the Superior Oil Company. 14r. Bergloff presented the Council with plans of the proposed construction of the oil station. He stated that at the present time Superior Oil Company does not plan to construct the canopy shown on the proposed drawings but may ask for a PAGE 21 • Building Permit for construction of the canopy at a later date. Mr. Bergloff stated that the Superior Oil Company discussed the grades on the property with Darrel Clark of the City Engineers office. Be stated that some of the grade problem have been resolved as a result of this discussion. Mr. Bergloff stated that it was brought to his attention that a possible haatard exists due to the location of the driveway on the north side of the Federal Station and the driveway of the adjoining drive -in, dairy store.and restaurant. He stated that the Superior Oil Company is willing to pay half the cost of a connecting drive between the Federal Station and the drive -in should the owner of,the drive -in be agreeable to such construction. He stated that he believes this construction would be of more benefit to the owner of the drive -in than to the Superior Oil Company. There was a lengthy discussion of grades, safety, of access to the Federal Station and the Building Board Meeting. Mayor Nee informed Mr. Bergloff that he wished the Superior Oil Company would change the billboards sgrrounding the present Federal Station to conform with the new billboard and sign ordinance which the City is presently considering. Mr. Bergloff stated that Superior Oil Company would be happy to change these billboards to conform with the ordiaaante. Councilman Thompson asked Mr. Bergloff when he plants construction of this station. Mr. Bergloff answered, "In the Fall of 1965." Motion by Wright to concur with the recommendation of the Building Board and approve the request of the Superior Oil Company for a Building • Permit for construction upon the property at 7365 East River Road Northeast contingent upon compliance with the ordinance on elevation of the property. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. T�Z FWIT P- �ROPXRIX !- X[CH & 0; B�MON,, Mr. O'Bannon was present at the Council Meeting. He stated that the county was unable to -sell any of the tax forfeit lands in the City of Fridley. Be stated that one am offered to buy all the tax forfeit land in the City of Fridley provided there were no spacial assessments on this property. Be stated that he opposed selling all this land to one gentleman but that if the City of Fridley would be willing to take back the assessments and re- certify the assessments with the interest thereon to the County, spreading the assessments over long periods of time, he believed the County could sell these parcels. He stated that he favored posting of each of the parcels individually for resale. Mr. O'Bannon stated that the County would sell these parcels under contract for deed, requiring a $500 down pagramaat with payments over a 3 year period and providing that a buyer would became delinquent if he failed to make payments within 30 days. Mr. O'Bannon stated that the law requires that assessments due an the property be paid before the property can be sold. Councilman Sheridan stated that Mr. O'Bannon is proposing to add the Interest due on the assessments against these properties and reassess the mounts due against these properties over tea or:twenty years. Mayor Nee • asked Hre O'Bannon whether bit proposal is legal. Mr. O'Bannon answered, "Yee ". Councilman Thompson asked Mr. O'Bannon whether this proposal bas been carried out anywhere else. Mr. 00 red, "No, not to.my knowledge ". Mr. O'Bannon stated that he believes the City will never be PAG9 22 able to collect taxes assessed against this property in any other way. • He stated that the buyers objected to the amount of the special assessments against the property. The City Attorney stated that the City could carry out the plan of Mr. O'Bannon by having the Finance Director send a letter to the County withdrawing the assessments on the property, the City would hold a reassessment proceeding and spread the "easements over a loos period of time against these properties before the sale of the properties. He stated that it would be possible for the City not to certify the assessments until the day after the sale or when the County vents the assessments recertified. Be stated that the Finance Director could provide a schedule to the County before sale of the property specifying the amount of the assessments per year on each property, Motion by Thompson to receive the recommendation of Mr. Michael O'Baumon and command him for a thoughtful and creative plan, "to direct the City Attorney to check if there are any legal ramifications which the City should consider in the use of this plan and report to the Council. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the 'notion carried unanimously. PETITION #24 -1965: The City Manager explained that this petition is a petition for mainseasACe of certain roads in the City of Fridley, and included is a petition -for improvement of one of the roads. Mr. Benjamin, a signer of the petition, • was present at the.Couneil Meeting and stated that he wished to have these roads plowed in order to obtain access to his property in the winter time. He stated that it to necessary to have the roads plowed in order for the fire department to get its equipment to these properties in case of five. The City Manager stated that the right -of -way of these streets is narrow and the City does not plow these narrow streets except when the City believes it is necessary to do so in order to obtain access to the properties for the fire department. Councilman Wright stated that he believ that Washington Street should be maintained by the City of Fridley. Councilman Thompson asked whether any lots are tax delinquent. Mr. Benjamim answered that he does not know but he does not believe the lots are tax delinquent and that he has attempted to check on this matter. Mayor Pee asked vhether any of these streets will be constructed in the future. Mr. Benjamin answered, "Yes." go stated that his home fronts ou Jefferson and he does not object to paving the street, but that he would be satisfied With a gravel street in front of his home. He stated that he vished.to have the right-of-way to provide bin with access to 58th Avenue, otherwise, it is necessary for him totgesspass upon his neighbors property in the winterti In order to obtain access to his ow n property. Mr. Benjamin stated that he would be satisfied with a 30 foot hard surface road plowed by the City in the wintertime. Nation by Wright to receive Petition #24 -1965, refer it to the Administy for a feasibility study, and direct the Administration to make recommen- dations to the Council concerning what the City can do to satisfy • Mr. Benjmin's needs and those of his neighbors. Seconded by Thompson. Upan a voice vote, there bong no nays, the motion carried unanimously. �0 PAG'a 23 Councilman Wright stated that he discussed construction of the reservoir with the Parks and Playgrounds Sub- Caomittee and tba Recreation Commission and these groups have no objection to the construction of a flat top reservoir with the understanding that some use could be made of the top of the reservoir for recreation. Mr. Cene Peterson, somber of the firm of Was Associates, was present at the Council Meeting. W. Peterson stated that be. the other architects, members of the firm of Hodne Associates, were rather excited about the plan to make use of the top of the reservoir for recreatio4 purposes. He stated that the top of the reservoir would have sufficient structural stren and could be used for any one of a number of recreational purposes. Ho stated, however, that the State Board .Qf Health is opposed to any use of the top of the reservoir for this purpose, since the State Board of Health believes that leaks will inevitabley develop In the top of the reservoir and the use of the reservoir or access to the reservoir.by groups of people will create a hasard regardless of the manner in which the reservoir Is vented. He stated that the State Board of Health requires that hori+- sontal surfaces of the reservoir be inaccessible. He stated that this makes it impossible for the landscaping to be extended to the top of the reservoir and slay require that the reservoir be fenced. Mr. Peterson stated that the firm of Hodne Associates considered various • other schemes for making use of the reservoir, and one of these schemes is to sculpture the verticle surfaces of the reservoir in concrete. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Peterson which to the better buy, concrete sculpturing on the vertical surfaces of the reservoir or landscaping the area around the reservoir. lir..Peterson stated that landscaping mast be maintained, whereas, less maintenance is required for sculptusos. Councilman Wright asked whether it would be possible to paint murals upon the reservoir. Mr. Paterson replied that it would be easy to paint murals on the reservoir. The City Attorney stated that he would like to recommend construction of a monument on top the reservoir to -R 'It - 1mrate the tornado of May 6, 1965. Councilman Wright suggested letting each senior high school class paint a portion of the reservoir. He said in time this will produce an abstract painting!. Mgyos Nee asked Mr. Comstock whether the reservoir would be constructed of the seinforced concrete,or whether it would be constructed of pre - stressed concrete with concrete sprayed on the stem?! frarme. Mr. Comstock answered that the reservoir will be constructed of reinforced concrete in the usual saner with a six inch pitch on the roof, and concrete will not be sprayed on the frase.. Councilman Wright stated that he favors construction of the reservoir am and beautifying it later. Mr. Comstock stated that there is not time to begin construction of the reservoir this season if plans are to inclyde sculpturing the outside of the reservoir. He stated that there is tiros • to consider an exterior treatment of the reservoir at a later date. Councilmen Wright asked wbetber this is a good time to let bids for the construction of,tbe reservoir. Mr. Comstock stated that he believes this Is a good time to let bids. Councilman Kirkham stated that he favors something with a low coat. PAGE 26 • Nbtioa by Kirkham to adopt Resolution #151 -1965 setting the date and time of October llth at 12100 noon for the opening of bids and the date of October 18th, 1965 for considerations of bids for the con- struction of the 3,000,000 gallon reservoir. Seconded by Sheridan. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. APp'OZN7 19T TO PLA=IOKS C22STUR CfABLED 8/ 23165) s *my= Hem proposed the name of J. D. Amerman, 5650 Regis Drive, for appointment to the Hams Relations Committee. He stated that Mr. Amerman is an Attarney and a member of the firs of Wagner, Wagner and Amerman.. Motion by Wright to approve the appointment of Mr. J. D. Aaeraaioa to the um Han Relations Committee. Seconded by Zbompson. Upon a void vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ._rs2M� 18�6�.. � .1MM -' RIT 11- 1g6S3, Motion by Sheridan to receive and file the minutes of the Safety Committee Meeting of August 180 1965.. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no tugs, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Rirkhaos to receive and file the mitttttei of the Fridley Rousing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of August 18, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. - Motion by Sheridan to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Bonsittg and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of August 26, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unani- mouslq. Notion by aompson to adopt Resolution $158 -1965. Seconded by Wright. upon a voice vote, Councilman Kirkham voting not the motion carried. Councilman Wright stated that he wished to draw attention to one recommendation of the Recreation Commissions namely, that the Moore LWO Beach closing date be set by the Recreation Director rather then by Ordinance. He stated that this would necessitate an amendment to the, Ordinance. • Motion by Wright to receive and file the minutes of the Recreation Commission Meeting of July 291, 1965. Seconded by Thompson. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. PAGE 25 • BE C010ISSION MUTING MINU798 - AUGUST 24l 19651 Motion by Thompson to receive . and file the minutes of the Recreation Commission Meeting of August 26, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no Days, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Sheridan to receive and file the minutes of the Joint Parks and Playgrounds Sub - Committee and Recreation Commission Meeting of August 30, 1965.. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. C2§EMCAT10K: CITY ATTORW: VOTING MUMM: Motion by Kirkham. to receive and file the camminieatim of the City Attorney concerning the voting eligibility of former residents of the City of FridUy. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • The City Manager stated that the research done by the City Attorney concerning sever and water repairs is an attempt to solve a difficult situation. He stated that the City does not want the property owner to dig up the street. gs stated that the owner has to connect to the runout stub provided by the t contractor at the edge of the street and that this runout stub requires most of the maintenance. Motion by Wright to instruct the City Manager to recommend to the Council the proper Ordinances or.policies which the Council should adopt concerning prodecures for sewer and water repairs. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice votes there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. CITY ENGIMM: wlM_MT WIDE IN W12 M: The City Engineer stated that he wished to have the Cbm ell decide Mich of the streets between 49th Avenue. and 45th Avenue Northeast in Fridley should be a 30 foot width or a 36 foot width. The City Engineer explained that be needs this decision in order to locate the catch basins for construction of storm sewer project #12. The City Engineer stated that it is cheaper to move the catch basin dawn stream on the lead than it is to extend the is" and move the catch basin up stream. Councilman Wright asked whether before street paving is installed the sump around the catch basin could be shaped. to prevent washout of the street. The City Engineer answered that this could be done. • Motion by Wright that the policy of the Council be that 3rd Street from 45th Avenue Northeast to 53rd Avenue Nwtbeast be established a " foot wide street, that 2% Street Northeast and 2nd Street Northeast from 45th • Avenue Northeast streets, and du Avenue Northeast established as vote, there being PAGE 26 to 49th Avenue Northeast be established as 36 foot vide t 46th Avenue Northeast, 47th Avenue Northeast, and 48th from Main Street Northeast to 3rd Street Northeast be 30 foot wide streets. Seconded by Xixkhamn. Upon a voice no nays, than motion carried unanimously. 2be City 8ngineor explained that the Minnesota Highway Department wants the City of Fridley to let bids for construction of 0012 before October 15, 1965. He stated that the ldinassota Higimay Department prepared the plans for SS#12 In previous years, and the firm of Comstock and Davis is presently bringing the plans up to date. He stag that Columbia Heights wants to approve the plans and the bids before the bids are let. The City Attorney stated that the City of Fridley needs to have a contract with the City of Columbia Heights concerning Construction of the project and listing the dates when payments will be made for the project. He stated that he believes the City of Columbia Heights has sold bonds and has the funds available for construction of 83012. Councilman Sheridan asked whether it would be possible to obtain an agreement with Columbia Heights that-the bond money be deposited in escrow with the City of Fridley or that some agreement be written such that the City of Fridley will be assured that the bond money will be available for construction of 83#12. The City Attorney stated that a written agreement with Columbia Heights will be drawn, whereby, Columbia Heights will agree to pay a given- amount on a given date and the bids will be submitted to them before the construction contract is awarded. Councilman Sheridan stated that if the City of Columbia Heights should be involved in a taxpayers suit to prevent payment of the funds, the City of Fridley would not have the ;portion of funds that Columbia Heights is contributing to the project. He stated that it would be better for the City of Fridley to-have the funds in escrow. The City Attorney suggested that the AdMu tration ask the City of Columbia Heights for an agreement to escrow the band money for construction of 83#12. The City Engineer suggested that both Fridley and Columbia Heights could sign the contract for construction of SS#12. Mayor Nee asked whether the contractor would agree to this arrangement, and how he would establish who was to provide payment. Councilman Wright suggested that payment could be made by the City of Fridley, the City of Columbia Heights, and the Minnesota Highway Department according to the proportion which each is required to furnish to the project. The City Attorney stated that' onds Columbia Heights approved the construction of the project and signed the agreement they were bound Ito pay for the same. He stated that a tax payers suit in the City of Fridley would also tie up funds in the City of Fridley. CouncIlWo Sheridan asked whether it was correct that . vhen Columbia Heights approves the contract they also approve paymnt. Councilman Wright suggested that the City of Fridley toald bill the City of Columbia Heights for each stage of construction wbesever a payment becomes due. The City Engineer stated that if the City is going to let bids for 39#12 in time for the Minnesota Highway Department to let bids for the construction of Track Highway #+47, it is necessary for the City to pass a resolution advertising for bids. The City Engineer asked whether the lateral going in Roman Road up to Gibraltar Road should be left in the contract.' The Councilmen agreed that the lateral should be left in the contract. PAGE 27 • Councilman Sheridan asked what is the estimated cost of the construction. 21r, Comstock answered that the Minnesota Highway Department estimated the cost of construction at 0990,000.00 one year ago. He stated that since that time, acquisition of the right -of -way for trunk highway #+47 has been deleted from the cost, but the construction of additional laterals in the City of Fridley and catch basins in the City of Columbia Heights have been added to the construction project. Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Comstock what the fee of Comstock and Davis will be for this construction. Mr. Comstock answered that the fee will be 6% of the construction cost which includes drawing the plans for construction, inspection and the field work of construction. Notion by Sheridan to adopt Resolution #159 -1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #160 -1965: the City Attorney stated that if construction of storm sever project #12 to to proceed, the City will used to authorise condemnation of certain lands for construction. Councilman Sheridan stated that if certain of the property owners agree to donate lands needed for construction to the City of Fridley and some of the owners do not donate the land but insist on being paid for the land, it should be the City policy to pay all the property owers for the necessary easements. The City Attorney stated that he agrees with • this policy. Motion by Thompson to adopt Resolution #160 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimoudy. CITY AMY: ST. 1965 -2 CONDMNATiON: XDtion by Kirkham to concur with the recommendations of the City Attorney, approve the settlement of condemnation of street parcels is Street Project 1965 -2 and state that the City is content and will not appeal the condensation proceedings. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. COM ICATIOND. FRIDIZY HOUSING AND REDEVELOFHM _AUTHORITY: BOW ELECTION: Councilman Sheridan asked whether it is possible at this time to determine what the City ®s share of Urban Renewal costs will be. Councilman Wright stated that estimates of the costs are made on the high side and that it is estimated the costs will not exceed the amount recommended by the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Motion by Wright to direct the Administration to take the proper legal steps • to place on the ballot of the General Election of November 2, 1965 a general obligation bond issue for the purpose of carrying out Urban Renewal projects PACE 28 • in the University Avenue project area, the City Center project area and the Riverview Heights project area, the total mount not to exceed $968,400.00. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote there being no nay &, the motion carried unanimously. BOWING PERMIT AMXCATION - 370 MISSISSIPPI STM= - MISKOWIC� Motion by Thompson to grant the request of Mr. and Mrs. Miskoaic for a Building Permit to make repairs upon their property at 370 Mississippi Street Northeast. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. RESCyt=ON #161 -1965 ADE RIRING SATE CW CERTAIN CITY P'ROPMTY s Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #161 -1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a. voice vote, there being no nays, the nation carried unanimously. Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #162 -1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion tarried unanieoously. Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #163 -1965. Seconded by Kirkhmm. Upon a . voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Sheridan to table to the Regular Council- Muting of September 20, 1965 consideration of the Resolution ordering the Improvement, final pions and specifications, and ordering bids for sever project #76. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. gVIC � BIDS` Motion by Kirkham to receive mad file the memo of C. 8. Smiley and Associates concerning the Civic Center Bids. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Thompson left the Comell. Meeting at 2:30 A.M. T2llIIER PERMIT APPLICAMON -6876 CI L RQADt_ Motion by Kirkham to approve the application of Walter N. Hill for a pesdt to occupy a trailer at 6876 Chancel Road. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. . TBA= � APPZICATION - 6570 FMLZY STREET: . Motion by Wright to approve the application of Joseph R. Anderson for a permit to occupy a trailer at 6570 Fridley Street subject to apprvoal of connections for services to the trailer. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. • CLMSk 0 PAIGE: 29 Notion by Kirkham to approve General and Public Utilities Claims #6232 through #6362 and Liquor Claims #7758 through #7805. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. Motion by Sheridan to approve payment of the following estimates: PAMNTS TO DEBRIS CIZAN UP CON!1RACTORS INVOICE NUMER CON?RACTOIt 20537 Carl Bolander & Sons Co. Robert Crawford Robert Crawford Walter R. Freeman Walter R. Freemen 1813 Fridley Trucking Co. 634 Lemmetti & Sons, Inc. OF IA�NT Hough 11-70 loader w /operator Dump Truck w /operator Dump Truck w /operator HG 9 Loader HG 9 Cat Loader 28. yd. Trash Trucks w /drivers 795 American, Lo -boy, Boom Truck, a /operators , $ 375 804. 760. 1,465. 1,360. TOTAL $10, Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimmnnsly. Motion by Wright to approve payamat of the estimates and append the list to the mates. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanime617. MM M MM ; C=MROf G O BOE FOR PMK ClBANUP: Motion by Kirkham to approve payment of the estimte of the Jr. Chamber of Commerce for park cleanup in the amount of $4,000. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimmaly. . . LIB Motion by Kirkham to approve the license applications followingt EIECTRICAL Cramer $1e ctric Service CompaW 3101 Irving Avenue SoutIL byt Claude Csamar, Jr. Minneapolis, Minnesota Nyberg Electric 4104 West 62nd Street Minneapolis 24, Minnesota Trenary Electric Company 3542 Coon Rapids Boulevard Anoka., Ximwoota by: Richard 8. Nyberg Loren Tr emery 09 s2.1 Now .NBp' I= 1n � 1I5 NEW Ray Stegora Plumbing & Heating Co. 5439 Quebec Avenue North by: Ray Stegora Minneapolis 28, Minnesota t ..MMACTMS International Homes 2101 Broadway Street N.E. by: JcOqh Silverman Minneapolis', Minnesota Medway Main Line Home &, Inc. 7701 Normandaie Road, Suite #109. by: Carey L. Lindsey Minneapolis, Minnesota Heavy 0. Mikkelsoa 20 West 59th Street by: Henry O. Mikkelson Minneapolis 19, Minnesota Taylor Maid Homes 1201 Highway No. 8 by: Roy Taylor Neon Brighton, Minnesota Sheldon A. Martenson Construction Co. 1200 Highway No. 100 N.E. by: 36eldon A. Mortenson • Minneapolis, Minnesota HRATW -- Ray Stegora Plumbing & Beating Co. 5419 Quebec Avenue North by-. Ray Stegora Hinneapalis 28, Minnesota Tom & Country Plubming & Heating Co. Boa 14" by: Richard Hoganson Minnetonka. Minnesota Diomw Tbamas J. Bode 11260 Buchanan Road N.H. Minneapolis 33, Minnesota by: Thomas J. Boda PbtMING Advance Plumbing Company 1920 Inca Lane byt Harold 'C. Burkhardt New Brighton, Minnesota Avoles Plumbing Service, Inc. 779 Bast 7th Street bys A. Walter Avoles • St. Paul 6, Minnesota Doyle & O'Brien Plumbing, Inc. 2817 Emerson Avenue South by: Patrick J. O'Brien Minneapolis 8, Minnesota C. P. Doyle s2.1 Now .NBp' I= 1n � 1I5 NEW • _PLtAanG (CONT.) E, D. Paulson Plumbing A Heating Co. 9333 Cedar Avenue South msapoIle 20, Minnesota Than & Country Plumbing Heating'Co. Boas 1473 Misnnetooka, Minnesota Ventco, Incorporated PAGE 31 by: Edward D. Panisas by: Richard Hoganson MW 590 Bloomington Avenue South by: John N. Norblom R Minneapolis, Minnesota Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BIDS FOR CONST�JCTIOS O@ RMS COURT - MAW LAKE_ BEACH: rr ���. Motion by Wright to table indefinitely authorization of bids for construction of a tennis court on Moore Lake Beach. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. AU D BIAS FOR RBPAIR AND RESURFACE OF UNNIS CQMTS CWHONS PAR$: Notion by Wright to authorize bids for the repair and resurfacing of tennis courts In Commons Park. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there • being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. CHANGE 0.= #1 -STIM 1965 -1t - Motion by Kirkham to approve change order #1 for street construction project 1965 -1. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BUILDING PM= =*- Notion by Wright to extend the lower building permit fees to original property owners who wish to rebuild tornado damaged property through December 31, 1965, and to revert the fees thereafter to the previous amounts. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • F$ID1RY • COLUMBIA MIGS'1'!S D GE: Motion by Sheridan to table consideration of the drainage agreement between Fridley and Columbia Heights to the Regular Council Ming of September 20, 1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried un ulmously. Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #164 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #165 -1965 APPROVING PLANS ARID ELEVATIONS (T. H. 694): _... The City Engineer stated that he wished to obtain some agreement with the PAGE 3Z Minnesota Highway Department for access from T. H. 694 to the Mississippi River for use by the City of Fridley to place emergency vehicles into the Mississippi River. He stated that the City of Fridley has agreements with the Conservation Commission for public access In two other places to the Mississippi River. The City Engineer stated that the fence along Inter- state Highway #694 will not extend to the water line and he wishes the Minnesota Highway Department to omit one portion of the fence. There was a discussion concerning whether gates should be installed or whether a portion of the fence should be emitted. The City Hsnager suggested that the Council could pass the resolution, the Administration could work out the details and report back to the Council if necessary. Notion by Sheridan to adapt Resolution #165 -1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no says, the notion carried unanimously. 7be Finance director explained the purpose of the Resolution. He stated that the City has signed agreements with most of the property ewers., Notion by Sheridan to adopt Resolution #166 -1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. IOA Notion by Wright to adopt Resolution #167 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. COMMUNICATIONS: $QARD Off' MLTH: REPORT Motion by Wright to receive and file the report of the Board of Health. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. ESC, R�BI�T�afii COMMISSION: PARR IMPAOVBMENTS Motion by Wright to receive and file the coemmmication from the Recreation Commission concerning park improvements and refer the question of acquiring move of the privately owned lots on East Moore Lake for park purposes to the Parke and Playgrounds Sub-Committee. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. MTOCR AND DAMS INCORPMATED: COUNTY DITCH #l7 Motion by Sheridan to receive and file the comanication from Comstock and Davis concerning County ditch #17. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BUILDING PERMIT 788 - 63RD AVENUE NORTHEAST: Motion by Sheridan to wive the front yard and side yard setback requirements great variances from 35 feet to 31 feet in the front yard and 10 feet to 5 fe In the sideyard in accord with the site plan presented by the property owner, to permit construction of a garage upon the property at 788 - 63rd Avenue Northeast and grant a Building Permit for the same. Seconded by Kirkham. Up a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PACE 33 Cf�+�i7N'tCAa'iD�Is N. S S.S.D *BASENSN'1'8 OUTLOT 1 RIM CREEK PLAZA NORTH ADDITI_O The City Manager stated that the N.S.S.S.Do weeds to acquire a small easewtut upon Oatlot l and has asked the City for this easement for the N.S.S.S.D• The City Manager read the letter to the Council and stated that he has had the $ngineering Department verify the information given in the letter. Motion by Kirkham to authorise the City Manager to sign an agreement with the N.S.S.S.D. transferring the easement to the N.S.S.S.D. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNEN=s There being no further business Mayor Net declared the regular Council Meting of September 7, 1965 adjourned at 2 :55 A *M. Respectfully submitted, Raymond B. Bade Secretary to the Council September 14, 1965 MEMO TO: City Manager BALI: Mewls C e Brunsell SUBJECT: Sanitary Sever Lateral Assessment Project #58 As you know there have been several hearings held on the sanitary sewer lateral assessment for Project #58, both in 1964 and 1965. one of the problems seems to be the question of whether Lot 5, Block 1, Doe's Addition was previously assessed for am= lateral service. We have checked our records several tines and our conclusion is that it has not been, but' Mr. Cochran does not agree to this. I don't know of anything further that we could check that has not been checked already concerning this matter. I don't believe that Mro Cochran will ever change his mind regarding the assessment :regardless of what the amount is. To date there have been two assessment rolls made,. in one roll the rate came to $7.62 per' foot and in the other roll the rate came to $14.09 per foot. The reason the rate is higher for this roll is that not as such property was L%cluded. Two other possibilities would be to give Mr. Cochran an allowance of $1,06.33 on Lot 5, Don's Addition sad spread the balance of the cost ewer the benefited property. The gate would then be $7.97 per foot on all property, giving Mr. Cochran credit for the $1909833. The fourth alternative mould be to leave Outlot 5, Doe's Additium out altogether. In which event, the rate per foot for the assessment would `tire $8.14 per foot. Z don't know that Mr. Cochran would be satisfied with MW of these alternatives and I think the only thing to do is to adopt one of the rolls and then let the courts decide Whether the property Is benefited in the amount of the assessment. 34 STORM SEWER, WATER AND SANITAIL SEVER IMPAOVEM14T PROJECT 130. 58 Its 5. and -6 alt B1 $a (Parcel 23x3) Addition Se Auditor's Sub. #22 1 in 22 ggatral AXOM Footage on LaIMI, I L 130 Alter A � $ .811 to MR 040 18 (Parcel 2320) Auditor's Sub. #22 1 110 94 .00 19 Auditor's Sub. #22 1 120 1803 o20 20 Auditor's Sub. #22 1 120 1803 .20 21 Auditor's Sub, #22 30 22 .60 2 Auditor's Subo #88 1 306 2#1+%Q52 17 (Parcel 2000) Auditor's Sub. #88 (Crossing Charge) 938 7814 056 4 Auditor's Sub. #88 150 181 .00 Outlot 1 Don8s Addition (Crossing Charge) 508 3887 o96 5 Donea Addition 200 18 000 2 t Blackmar Addition 1 12 .80 17 ' S Spring Valley 1 113 98.M6 • 18 8 Spring valley 1 125 1907 ,30 19 1 Spring Malley 1 125 1907!.30 16 2 (Parcel 1410) Spring Valley 12U TOTALS: 10 3 v O15 $ 249 8i .90 Costa Sever Service - $1,9222,80.40' 10 Services $122.80 per serrice Seiner Lateral: Total. Cost v $23ga''5o45 Cost of Crossing at Bice Creek Road (Outlot 1, Don's► Add,) - Combined with La Gbarlp Cost of Crossing m 6600 S. of Rice Creek Road (Lot 17s Aud.Sub. #88) Combined with Lateral Charge Sever Lateral Life - $238575.45 a 3095 = $7.62 per foot * Plus Sbare of plain Line 35 36 STURM SEWE ,k MATER AND SAtdITAI SE:dER iMPROVEIZIIT PR.O=T NO,. 58 �... tea , ,u►er — Sanricg, T,.#ps and is _t2nl are C at�al Aves�u� I 5 anc�. 2 1 Biackmar Addition 7 1 Spring Halley $ 1 Spring Valley 1.9 1 Spring Valley 16 2 (Parcel. 11+10) Spring Malley 1 125 1,499 f, $ 199540 196720 19813° 10813v 4va 1038101 192730 208180 1220 107140 1as�.o 188$4.0 $ 249803.1 Costa Sewer Service — $10222,,80 $ `�0 Serices m $122080 per Se: %vlde Sewer Laterals Total Cost 4 $239575.45 Cost of Crossing at Rive Creeds Road (Outlot is Bon °s Add,) 19273oO7 Lost of Crossing — 6W S. of Rise Creek Road — (Lot 170 Aud. Sub. #88) 10181.13 Sewer Lateral Line ®$21012'3.25 .; 1s499' = $14.09 per fool, * Plus Share of Fain Line • FooUge on .? tick Sorviceil lateral Lines $8 (Parcel. 2300) Auditorr.j Subo /f22 I 130 18 (Parcel 2320) Auditor l Cs Sub. #22 110 19 Auditor`:. Sub, #22 1 120 20 Avditor' 3 Sub. #22 1 120 of Auditor "s SO. #22 30 2 Audit.W v Sub. #88 1 3r/ 17 %,,Parcel 2000) Audi"_or0f; Sub. #88 (Crossing ChsrgeV Outlot 1 Don's Addition (Crossing Charge) 5 Don') rj 'Addition 200 2 1 Biackmar Addition 7 1 Spring Halley $ 1 Spring Valley 1.9 1 Spring Valley 16 2 (Parcel. 11+10) Spring Malley 1 125 1,499 f, $ 199540 196720 19813° 10813v 4va 1038101 192730 208180 1220 107140 1as�.o 188$4.0 $ 249803.1 Costa Sewer Service — $10222,,80 $ `�0 Serices m $122080 per Se: %vlde Sewer Laterals Total Cost 4 $239575.45 Cost of Crossing at Rive Creeds Road (Outlot is Bon °s Add,) 19273oO7 Lost of Crossing — 6W S. of Rise Creek Road — (Lot 170 Aud. Sub. #88) 10181.13 Sewer Lateral Line ®$21012'3.25 .; 1s499' = $14.09 per fool, * Plus Share of Fain Line • STORM SOMA WATER AND SALITARY SMCa IMOYSMENT PROJECT NO. 58 0 Itemas S an 6 w 18 (hxoel2300) 18 ' ( Parcel 2320) 19 20 21 2 17 (Parcel 2000) 4 Outlot 1 2 17 •18 19 16 1 Blackmar Addition 1 Spring valley 1 Spring Valley 2 (Parcel Sig Va]1ey 1410) Spring valley 1 1 113 1,a 1 125 i,1 1 125 1,1 1 120 1.d TOTALS s 10 2895 # 240 Costs Sewer Service - #1,222.80 •, 10 Services : #122.80 per services Sewer Laterals Total Cost #23,575.63 Cost of Crossing at Rice Creek Road (Outlot 1, Don's Add.) - Combined with Lateral Cost of Crossing - 6601 S. of Rice Crok Road (Lot 179 Aud. Sub. #88) - Combined with lateral Obarge Sewer Lateral Line - #23,575.45 ; 2895 0 MIA, per foot Plus Sbare of Yalu Line 0 37 Footage on Altarnato AM SW.Um L-atsra.1 L�fnee Ad Auditor's Sub. #22 1 130 Auditor-Is Sub. #22 1 110 10018, Auditor /a Sub. #22 1 120 1,099, Auditorle Sub. #22 120 1:099, Auditor /s Sub. #22 30 244. Auditarls Sub. #88 1 306 29613. Auditorls Sub. #88 Crossing Marge 938 710635• Auditor's Sub. #88 150 11,221. Doses Addition Crossing OhmTom 508 4,135. 1 Blackmar Addition 1 Spring valley 1 Spring Valley 2 (Parcel Sig Va]1ey 1410) Spring valley 1 1 113 1,a 1 125 i,1 1 125 1,1 1 120 1.d TOTALS s 10 2895 # 240 Costs Sewer Service - #1,222.80 •, 10 Services : #122.80 per services Sewer Laterals Total Cost #23,575.63 Cost of Crossing at Rice Creek Road (Outlot 1, Don's Add.) - Combined with Lateral Cost of Crossing - 6601 S. of Rice Crok Road (Lot 179 Aud. Sub. #88) - Combined with lateral Obarge Sewer Lateral Line - #23,575.45 ; 2895 0 MIA, per foot Plus Sbare of Yalu Line 0 37 Ift W 1 Bledemar Addition ! 122.8 17 1 Spring V1113A y 1 113 180234 18 1 Spring Valley 1 125- 10119.0 19 p' Spring Valley 1 125 1811900 16 2 (Parcel 1410) Spring Valley 1 120 1.079,2 TOTALS: '10 3095 $ 248796,8 Cost: Sewer Service - $10222.80 a 10 Services -- $122.80 per service Sewer Isteral: Total Cost • $230575.63 Cost of Crossing at Rice Creek Road (Outl»t 10 Don's Add.) - Combined with Ie Cost of Crossing • 6602, S. of Rice Cs �d Lot 170 Aud. Sub. A •• Combined with Isteral Charge Sewer LA.tsral Lim - $,230575.45 :' 3095 m $7.97 per foot OShare of Main Line STORM SEWERO WATER AND SANITARY SEM 111PROMENT PROJECT NO.. 98 Ilm 6 §AALt ry Seger •Service Lines &W on Coalal 5,W Footage on Alternate Lot Ad di n Sery ices 1 fieral, Lines A, s,�„e a 18 (Farcel 2300) Auditoras Sub. #22 1 130 18 (F1xml 2320) Auditoros Sub. #22 1 110 19 Auditorts Sub. #22 1 120 1,079. 20 AuditorDs Sub. #22 1 120 10079. 21 Auditorts Sub. #22 30 2390 2 Auditoroi Sub. #88 1 306 29561. 17 (Parcel 2000) Auditor's Sub. #88 (Crossing Charge) 938 70475. 4 Auditor's Sub. #88 150 1,195. Outlot 1 Dons Addition (Crossing Charge) 506 490480 5 Don's Addition 200 (leas $1,098933) 493. W 1 Bledemar Addition ! 122.8 17 1 Spring V1113A y 1 113 180234 18 1 Spring Valley 1 125- 10119.0 19 p' Spring Valley 1 125 1811900 16 2 (Parcel 1410) Spring Valley 1 120 1.079,2 TOTALS: '10 3095 $ 248796,8 Cost: Sewer Service - $10222.80 a 10 Services -- $122.80 per service Sewer Isteral: Total Cost • $230575.63 Cost of Crossing at Rice Creek Road (Outl»t 10 Don's Add.) - Combined with Ie Cost of Crossing • 6602, S. of Rice Cs �d Lot 170 Aud. Sub. A •• Combined with Isteral Charge Sewer LA.tsral Lim - $,230575.45 :' 3095 m $7.97 per foot OShare of Main Line .► 0nI umu IqO.-_......._._.a_.._. AN ORDuMCE AMIDING GHAYnM 45 OF = CrLY CODE OF .nM CITY OF FRIDLEY AND RAZING TO THE CLASST3- NATION OF ADDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICTS The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Secede Section 45.04 of the City Code of Fridley shall be amended to include additlarally to the kinds of Districts mentionedathe following: CR-1 Districts Section 2. That Chapter 45 of the C.ity Code of the City of Fridley be amended by adding thereto the Section hereinafter indicated: Section 45.101. C$ -1 District. uses Permitted. Offices and office buildings for medical dental,, optical clinics and apothecary shops., harmless and inoffensive laboratories accessary to pparmi.tted uses in the same building. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIE C=Z OF FRIDLEL THIS ._�.._w.___d_. DAY OF _ -- 9 1965. William J. Nee ® Mayor ATTEST s Marvin C. Bruuoell, City Clerk Public Hearing: First Heading: 8 @pt�ab, er ?. 1965. • Second Beading: Publish.......: 012% el %X-7 N ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO : VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE. THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY do ordain as follows: A ' Section "I. -FOR THE VACATION OF A STREET, described as follows: 'All that part of the streets that lie in the plat of Johnson's River Lane Addition that lie in the following described tract: Comencing on the North line of Lot 13, Auditor's Subd. No, 23 Revised that is 63.97 feet West of the Northeast (NE) corner of said Lot 13; thence in a northerly direction in a straight line towards.. the Southwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, Johnson's River Lane Addition to a point that is on the northerly line of Lot 6, Block 2, Johnson's River Lane Addition extended West; thence East along said northerly line of Lot 6, Block 2, extended West to the Northwest corner of.said Lot 6, Block 2; thence South along the West line of said Lot 6, Block 20' to the Southwest corner of said Lot 6, Block 29!Johnson's River Lane ' Addition; thence West along the westerly extension'of the South line. of Lot 6., Block 2, Johnson's River Lane Addition to the East•line of'" Lot 13, Auditor's Subd. No. 23 Revised; thence northerly along the West line of said Lot 13 to the Northeast cornea of•said Lot 13; thence West along the North line of said Lot* 130 Auditor's Subd. N6.•*,23 ; Revised to` the point of beginning thence terminating, all located..id { the Southeast Quarter (SL %) of §159-x•309 R -24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State'of Minnesota.' and the East 12 feet of Lots 13'and'14, Auditor's Subd. No.`23 . Revised, Anoka County, Minnesotae f be, and is hereby vacated. Section 2. THAT SAID VACATION has been made after Notice of Public Hearing in conformance of Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the -City Code shall be so amended. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF'FRIDLEY this 23rd day of August, 1965. ATTEST: Mayor Clerk Public Hearing: August 23, 1965 First Reading: September 7, 1965 Second Reading:' Publication: 40 IMTRACT OF MINUTES OF HWING OF TILE CITY COUNCIL OF A SPECIAL H0T1W HELD AUGUST 23, 1965# AT 800 O'CLOCK P.M.s AT THE CITY 'HALL, CITY • OF FHIDLEYp MBNZSOTA. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof' a special moetiYng of the City . Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, was duly hold at the City Hall in said City on Monday# the 23rd day of Augmts, 196% at 8soo o'clock P.M. The following members were presents and the following were absents .0 �#e eeiF a�+r The clerk announced that the proposed assessment for Storm Sswfes Water and Sanitary Sewer Project No. 58 had been filed In his offlas on the 2nd day of August, 19659 and that notice of a hearing on saV1 assessment to be held at the spr4dal meeting of the Council on the 23rd day of Augusts.1965, had been given in the norm and manner &a provided by law. The Clerk presented an affidavit showing publication of such notice in the official, newspaper, which affidavit was examined and found satisfactory and ordered placed on filoo The Mayor announced that the meeting was open for c.=ideration of objections to the assessment heretofore filed with the '1,ity Clerk for STORM SEWER, WATER AN;j SANITARY SEWER WROVEMMT PH=, T NO. See The Clerk reported that written objections had been filed by the following persons affecting the following described lots, pdeces or parcels of lando to -wits 0 �0 42 Par-o 2 v 58 '!a .f'l:l.`l.�ni`cZ,.2i r, e3 nitix ?'(3':3 'vI3a27 �1i� z�J arA L+repon'tei their ob"jE3'f3tiona to i 1 ";1.PS.I; OF ai1:7WTION After due eco iderat ior; of all cNuld objecti.ona, Counci3zan bx xoduced the .folIcsa°Ir., ? ;'IIc3 iiOVIA kta- adWtiont RESOLUTION NO,, 1964 1 A R&SULM TOR CC~PWUU11111 AS3L ZJPI tIvr, FOR .53TOIT4 SWER, WATIM, Am BE; IT J }SOLV ' ED By the City auras: �:t of AWtae City of Fridl(VF Mime -motay l a r�.i: a " ,�T C.� 'Ir ¢k. i°+ 't . •i1. iiklf� e��3£r . V'tii't : 0 (if the eng"irwer3g hwetofole ueleatted by t1fia Council x;or zvj h purpoaes cluIcniabed the pr*per amounts to be av�cw;ad for idle , STOW, S,+ j7ft j;A:i'gi .��.� 3��I;['�llk?z :;��L�'t )P�'iOVDiMT P'R£ato Nl?, 58 in 62tid Ci-4. , r.;ain „.4 giro ;lot, piece or parcel of lwid in ucccrtal:cea u-J. h the of lws and has prepared -ad fi.3.Gd with 'Llie C ivy Clark tabtei fAted statements in duplicate prouur c"e;^ript&on,, of "cis and evez7 late piece or ' p:arce3, of land to `b;, u.oecially U *SiGaZ;ed al"d tha =Ount cn� "l tad the acme, 2� rotic;e has be du - utla'�.$xaioi �.� sri ^ad by' Ira that. t e Council wol� ld tREfjI� 1x.11 a r, rAl .ar 6 'oi4iion ut tzhiu time and place to ;3acis on the p'F” Cr;Jo.: cd 3 Ja. pafSiS+r,'4 �"in'.1 ^-:�7,,", 1p ?c . ^Y, A:.1. E mP, y S LY2�.f$ Vii: iig been A open a cc a -u? F: r � c`:. what `xa interYz• -st i j mid an gpprrtunity hies boaa gives L +r :s?. 1.iltera;a4ed percxxci to pre w.jt their ob joc tl Boa a i.i' r�r� r y �:ct wA h. ;) povod aesea sment or to a::r, q.temy %11 .3raof� xau : �; ectionz have bm -L riled j except n U 4�3 rv, ... 3 r'A•r��fc•t �`o0 3� Ic. 'fhe amow,s specified in the proposed assassioeni, are changed and altered as folzacm a A 50 'Illi'a Cotm.cil f inds that each of the lots,, ;pieces or parcels of Viand dAu munerFated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was PmO is speciany benefited by the. S`i'i1c'DI' S'rNER, VATER ,PIT? S .4.Rri`f1 ;.RY Sr!,-IM TM?VVI2JM PROJMT, ' NO. 58. in ;;ha srao-ant ih said proposed assessment ,ron1 in the amount set opposite the description of each such l.ct.9 piece or parcel of lard, acid that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots., pieces or parcels of land therein described. 6. Such proposed ' assassment. as q1tered , modified mid corrected is affirmed, adontod and c nisd, and the swrs fixed and named in said proposed asses lent •as al.teriezd, modified and corrected, i:Vch the changes and alts.ratione herein above made, are afw'Jnned, ad'tpted and -coiif'tmed as the proper special assas'rnz azrt far each pieces or parcals of Imad, respecti•are:ty. 7. Saild €'£isoss meat so a'ff:Umed, er3opted and confia.°med shaLL bs cartificd to day the *C.M -,y C:I wrk and Tiled it his office and � sImIl, thereupon be' cnd c:ormlitute Vhe special assessment for SdORM, SE -71M9 WITH- — s1RD SANITARY S.NTER DIPROVL?494T PRUBOT NO. 58. L. The mmoui7Vs assessed al ainst each lot; piece or parcel of land shall be`,ar in'o esv from the date hereof tMtil the Gana have• been paid at the retie of six per cent (6%) per annum. � 9. Such asseemienu mall be payable in one or twmyby annual instnllmnts pWable Qn the first day of January in each ,years begin in the year 196L, mid, ccatinuing until all of said instaallmmbs shal3 I have been raid, each instO- Ueii's to be collected with taxes` coll•ectibIa during said year by the County Auditcr. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up &W file in the office of the Coin Ay Aizlitor of Anoka County a certified 'statement of the amount of all such unpaid casses�r,:aea$s' and t amount which win be due there.on on the firs''`da3r of` `rivary in each year. ! The motion for the adoption of the foregoing r�soluticn was duly seconded by Council= , and upon vote being "- taken thereon the f avor t ®reef 2 � .- .. ... .___.._.. i � I •,o*ot ed against; ll ;ha a, ma s :i1M C�.:�wr.,�.C�V.C�J. iSi 001,93 .DI ✓1 : IUD f.)TY "T ';�;'tNJf! 1. ;� �i t'�.J�Yi'y.r_.r`.� THIS ....� ..............:.a s VI TI 6 CITY OF FRnlyal i i i t i f 45 -1965 RESOLMON ORDERING ULPRO-MENTS, APPROVIV, OF PTANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISE WiT FOR BIDS: StMVY3Y SEETAR 'G9.'RGWW1iT PROJECT #76 WMMEAS, persuant to a Resolution #115-1965 of the City Council, adopted on July 6., 1965, Comstock and Davis, Inc., Consulting; Engineers, has prepared plans vend specifications for all of the improvments proposed by Resolution #1114-4965 and has presented such plans and specific-atione to the Council for approval: ITM IF' THEREVOR.E. BE TT RESOLVED, By the Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows% (1) That the following improvement.- heretofore proposed by the Council revolut=ion are hereby ordered to be effected and can-yleted as soon as reasonably possible to-wit: (a) All of Lhe imprm)-eLwants and modifications of the sanitary sm,er and service counections as pwoposad in Plan I of the preliminary report in Sylvan it-Ula; that the work involved in such improvoneut ws listed above shall hereafter be desigaated as Sanitary Sewer Improvement • Project #76. (2) Such plans and spce-'sUficatlona, a copy of which are attached heTeto and made a 1 r hereof, are hereby approved. (3) The wcxk cx; bo - pa-rr,oarxeA iLtade-;,: Sanitary Sewer Project #76 shall be "ZIW'dev oze contract. The City Hay.&�atz, sllaall accordinj, .9 J. 1y prepare and cause to be LnBerted in the oi4 icial uevapapar advert-Isementa for bids upon the making of such Jxrprovs ;,taxtz under such approved p.'WrAS and 9DecifiCa- tions. The adverT,1-irrmen-8_ shal-I be published for thrsa (3) weeks (at least 2-1 days), and shall cpaaify the work to he dams and will state that bids will be opered and coy eidered at 12:00 o'clock (noon), an the dz,,, of 1965 ip the Council Chambers of the City�Wl, 'and tRa—t _rolv =cs -70'.1 "'be coneldiered unless sealed and filed with the City Clark, and anxompanied by a cauh. deposit, bid bond, or certified check payable to the CLtj AEOr five per cent (57.) of the amount of such a bid. That the aitverticiem-ent for bids for Sanitary Sewer improvement Project -6,76 chall be substantially in form as that noted it, E%-hibit "B" attar-hed howeto )'-or reference and made a part hereof. & ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF FRIDLE1Z, THIS DAY OF ,11 t• HALL, SMITH, HEDLUND, JUSTER, FORSBERG AND FEIKEMA ATTORNEYS AT LAW DOUGLAS HALL September 14, 1965 911 PRODUCE BANK BUILDING WYMAN SMITH MINN[APOLIBr M�NN[iOTA ii40 GEORGE HEDLUND - 999'1451 LEONARD T. JUSTER THOMAS G. FORSBERG OFFIC[B INS HENRY H. FEIKEMA OSBEO RONALD L.HASKVITZ COON RAPIDS r� 1 Lei FRIDLEY Mr. Earl P. Wagner City Manager 6431,University Avenue Northeast Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421 Re: Proposed Chapter 56 Dealing with Signs, etc. Dear Earl: As to the comments of the League of Women'Voters on the repeal of Subdivision 8 of Section 45.06 of the City Code, it appears to me that most all of that section is adequately covered by the proposed Section 56.08 (1), I had no intention to do any weakening as to that section. Maybe a second look should be taken so as to compare the two in detail. I include additions to 56.03(l) and 56.03(2) as proposed, by the Fridley Chamber of Commerce. I also include an addition to the temporary political signs on Page 7 (paragraph 13) suggested by Councilman Wright: Yours truly, n 46 ORDINANCE # r AN ORDINANCE REGULAT[NG THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, ALTERATION, LOCATION_OR MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY OF'FRIDLEY, PROVIDING FOR THE POSTING OF BONDS: THE.ISSUANCE OF._PERMITS AND FEES THEREFOR, THE REVOCATION OF PERMITS: rINSPECTION AND FEES THEREFOR: PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF: AND YOR REPEALING CITY CODE SECTION 45.06 SUBD. 8 AND ENACTING CHAPTER 56. The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: 1. There is hereby enacted a new Chapter of the City Code of.Fridley as follows: 56. SIGN REGULATIONS 56.01 This ordinance shall hereafter be known and cited as the "Sign Regulations ". 56.02 DEFINITIONS. As used in this ordinance unless the context otherwise indicates 1 (1) SIGN. The Term "Sign" shall mean a name, !identification, des- cription, display, illustration, structure or device which is affixed to, or painted, or represented directly or indirectly upon a building or other outdoor surface or piece of land, and which directs attention to an object, product, place* activity, person, institution, organization or business. (2) SIGN, AUTOMOBILE SERVICE. The Term "Automobi e'Service Sign" '. means any sign that does not exceed 32 square feet directing the motorist. travelling along the highway to a place or places catering to motoring iaeeds.s_ These include Auto laundry, eating establishment, motels, motor hotels, refreshment drive -ins, public garages, parking areas, repair garages,.service stations, drive -in theatres, and amusements parks. (3) SIGN, BILLBOARD. The term "Billboard" meatus any sign erected, constructed, or maintained for-the purpose of outdoor advertising, whether such sign is independently supported or placed upon the ground,;roof-or wali.of any building, and the advertisement thereon does not relate to connodities . L 49 Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 2 being sold or the business being conducted upon the premises. , (4) SIGN, BUSINESS. The term "Business Sign" shall mean any sign which directs.attention to a business or profession or to the primary commodity, service or entertainment sold or offered upon the premises Where such sign is located'or to which it is attached. (5) SIGN, FLASHING. The term "Flashing Sign" shall mean any illuminated sign on which the artificial light is n ®t maintained both eta- tionary and constant in intensity and color at all times when such a sign is in use. (6) SIGN, IDENTIFICATION. The term "Identification Sign" shall s;c mean any sign identifying a resident, school, church or other non - business use. (7). SIGN, ILLUMINATED. The term "Illuminated Sign" shall mean any sign which has characters, letters, figures, design or outline illumin- ated by electric light's or luminous tubes as a part of the sign proper. (8) SIGN, TEMPORARY. The term "Temporary Sign" shall mean any sign not over 40 square feet in industrial areas or 15 square feet in all other areas which is not permanently affixed to the ground or a building. Section 56.03 FEES. Permit fees for signs shall be (1) For signs 40 square feet or less an Ai itial fee of $10.00. and an annual charge of $5.00 for an inspection of such sign. The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly on a building, which advertises products sold or services provided in-that building. (2) For signs larger than 40 squre feet the initial fee shall be $25.00 plus 25 cents per square foot of the sign surface exceeding 100 square feet. The annual inspection fee shall be $12,50 plus 10,cents per square foot of the sign surface exceeding 100 square'.feet. T Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 3 The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly on a building; which advertises products sold or services provided in that building. (3) `No fees are required for the non - permit signs provided for in Section 56.06 and may be waived for religious, civic, school and public interests by a majority vote of the City Council. Section 56.04 PERMIT APPLICATION. Application for permits shall be made upon blanks provided by the Building 1uspector and shall state or have attached thereto, the.following information: (1) Name, address and telephone number of applicant. (2) Location of building, structure, or lot to which or upon which the sign is to be attached or erected. (3) Position of the sign or other advertising structures in relation to nearest buildings, structures, public streets or rights of Nay. The drawing showing such position shall be prepared "in-'scale." (4) Two blue prints or ink drawings of the plans and specifications and method of construction or attachment to the building or in the ground including all dimens1pns. Locating all light sources, ;i wattage, type and color of lights, and details of any light shields or shades. (5) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the structure 2 is designed for dead load and wind velocity in the amount required by this and all other ordinances of the City. (6) Name of person, firm, corporations or association erecting structure. (7) Written consent of the owner of any land on which the structure is to be erected. (8) Any electrical permit required for any sign. (9) AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY: (a) Which would authorize and direct the City of 50 N •� 51 1n. Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 4 Fridley to remove and dispose of any signs and sign structure on which a permit has been issued but which was not renewed, if the owner does not remove the 4hme within a 30 day period following the expiration bf the permit. (b) Which would authorize and direct the City of Fridley to remove the sign and sign structure, at the expense of the applicant, where maintenance is required and the maintenan a is not furnished, but - only after a hearing and after a notice of 60 days specifying the maintenance required by the City. (10) Such other information as the Building Inspector may require. Section 56.05 LICENSES AND BONDS. Nq person, firm, or corporation.shall engage in the business of erecting signs, nor shall he be entitled to a permit to erect a sign under this ordinance unless 1 to do so by the City'Council. Such license may be granted by the City Council after written application to the City Clerk, accompanied by an annual license fee of $25.00 and it may be terminated at any time for cause. The license shall expire on December 31st in the 'year of issuance-and each year thereafter. No license shall take effect until the licenses shall. file with the City Clerk a corporate surety bond in'the sum of $1,000.00 conditioned that the licenses shall make proper application for all sign work, pay necessary permit fees, conform to all the provisions of this Chapter and indemnify and hold the City, its officers and agents, harmless from any damage or claim resulting from or related to the erection or maintenance of any sign in the City by the licensee. f E. k �t f •tip i Section 56.06 PERMITS. It shall be unlawful to keep, install, ! i construct, erect, alter, revise, reconstruct, or'move any outdoor sign :J Ordinance - Signs, Billboards or sign structure within the City of'Fridley without first obtaintug a permit therefor., except the following (1) A sign not exceeding 15 square feet in area pertaining only to the sale, rental, or lease of the premises upon which displayed. (2) An identification sign, not exceeding 4 square feet in are ,(3) A business sign not exceeding 10 feet in area, which sign is placed on non- public property. (4) A temporary political sign in regard to a candidate or an election. (5) A temporary sign erected by a religious, eleemosynary, charitable, benevolent, educational, public or civic interest, provided that each such sign shall bear the name and addxess.of the ress onsible owner and shall be removed within 15 days after the date to which the temporary sign has relevance. All permits and the annual fees therefor shall expire April 30th of each year and must be renewed prior to that date. Section 56.07 GENERAL REGULATIONS. No;$'ign shall be erected i� or painted in the City of Fridley unless it shall conform to and meet these, regulations: (1) No sign shall be installed, which by.reason of position, shape or color would conflict with the proper functioning or interpretation of any traffic sign or signal. (2) There shall be no flashing signs',in the front setback within 150 feet of a street intersection. Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 6 - wr Lighted revolving signs shall be permitted within this area but the bottom of the sign surface shall be a' minimum of fourteen feet R above the street grade at that point. (3) Except for grand openings and holidays, banners.and streamers may not be used. (4) There shall be no use of revolving beacons, zip flashers or similar devices that would so distract automobile traffic as to constitute a safety hazard. (5) Except in Industrial Districts, signs shall not be painted directly to any exterior building surface but shall be on a separate frame except for temporary display windows. Sign letters, symbols may be attached directly to a wall by adhe$ive or mechanical means. (6) Temporary signs advertising buildings for rent and for sale may be placed in the yard of such building providing such signs are not closer than 10 feet to any property line and do not exceed 40 square feet in industrial areas and 15 square feet in other areas. (7) Signs not otherwise allowed advertising new housing developments of more than 30 building sites and located in Fridley may be constructed in any district, providing: Any one sign is not over 600 square feet; the signs are located at least 300.feet from any pre- existing home and 1.,000' from any sign advertising the same development and the signs are removed when the particular project is 95% sold out. (8) Except for grand openings and temporary signs less than 6 square feet, there shall be no temporary signs in any required setback area. There shall be no more than three such signa,on any parcel and the -total sign-area shall not exceed 18 square feet. 51 Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page'? (9) All temporary signs shall comply immediately with these performance standards upon the date this Chapter goes into effect. (10) No signs shall overhang the public right -of -way', (11) Directional signs not located on the premises of use in question may not be located in any district except by special permit. (12) 'i%e illumination of any sign located within 500 feet of any residential district lot line shall be diffused or indirect, non - flashing, and- designed so as not to reflect rays of light into adjacent residences. (13) TEMPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS. Temporary political signs shall be removed by the person or persons placing such signs within 15 days after the election for which they are applicable. Each such sign shall show the name and address, printed or indelible ink, of'the person responsible for the placing of the sign, who shall\ be deemed prima facia the person who placed the sign and is responsible fox' its removal. No person shall deface' A 24 hours following the or remove temporary political sign, prior to election, except with the consent and knowledge of the person responsible'` for the placing of the sign. - (14) All signs shall be maintained in good condition and the areas around them kept free from debris, bushes, high weeds, and from anything else which would be an eyesore or nui.san�P. The surface of all signs must be repainted at least once every two (2) years or whenever necessary as determined by inspection to prevent the sign surface from becoming unkempt in appearance. When any `sign is removed, the building inspector shall be notified and the entire surrounding area shall be cleared of all debris and unsightly projections and protrusions. (15) In multiple unit dwellings one identification or business sign not exceeding 12 square feet shall be permitted for I 5 Ordinance - Signs, Billboards -- each dwelling,group of 6 to 12 units. One identification or business sign not exceeding 40 square feet shall be permitted for each dwelling- group of 12 or more units. (16), The permit owner and the licensee shall each separately and jointly be responsible for all of the requirements.of this Chapter, including the liability for expense of removal and maintenance incurred by the City. Section 56.08 SIGN REQUIREMENT BY NAND USE. If they conform to and meet the General Regulations, the following signs may be erected or maintained as!shown for each district. No';other_ signs shall be I� erected; except that temporary political signs, may be erected in any district. (1) R -1, R -2 and R -3 DISTRICTS. �•a a. Type - Identification and Business Signs only. I� b. Number - One only on any lot. Ij l c. Size - Not more than 12 square feet, except as Il_ provided for in 56.07 (15). j: d. Maximun height' - Not more than;A feet above street grade. e. Maximum projection into front setback area Any, sign*., in residential district shall be *set "back a minimum of 10 feet from any property line. f. Illumination - Not permitted. IN (2) C -1 and C -IS DISTRICTS. a. Type Identification, Business and Automobile Service Signs. b.- Number - One per principal entrance or per building. a N Ordinance - Signs, Billboards c. Size - The gross surface area of all permitted signs on a lot or parcel shall not exceed the sum of 4 ,square feet per front foot of building. d. Height - No more than 4 feet above outside wall closes to the sign. e. Maximum projection into front setback area Any sign may project only,two feet into setback from building. f. Illumination - Illuminated but non - flashing signs permitted. (3) C -2 C -2S and P DISTRICTS." a. Type - Identification, Business, Automobile Service' and Illumiinated Signs permitted'. b. Number - Business Signs: One on building or one pylon or pedestal sign per each rental or separate business unit with. frontage on thoroughfare. One additional permitted for open 100 feet of fronpage. c. Size - No sign-'shall exceed 40,quare feet. d. Height - No part of a pylon or pedestal sign shall be less than 14 feet vertical distance above the street grade level or. more than 25 feet vertical distance above street grade level.' Roof signs may not be over 6 feet above nearest outside wall. e. Projection - No sign shall be closer than 10 feet from the property line.. f. Illumination - Illuminated and flashing signs permitted except those which are hazardous to vehicular traffic or create a nuisance to occupants of residences in the area. 7 1 Ordinance — Signs, Billboards Page 10 (4) 'M -1 and M -2 DISTRICTS. ...a. Types - All types permitted. "�b. Number - One per each 500 feet of street frontage. c. Height - No ground sign over 30 feet above grade and no roof sign more than 30 feet above the nearest outside wall. Section 56.10 HARDSHIP WAIVER. The provisions of this chapter may be wai-Yed wherer a strict application would bring undue hardship and the public interest would not be seriously Jeopardized after a public hearing before the Board of Appeals and an affirmative vote of 4 members of the City Council. Section 56.11. Any violation of this ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate off Be, Section 56.12-REPEAL. Subdivision 8:of Section 45.06 and any other portions of the-Fridley City Code inconsistent with this chapter are hereby repdAled. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF x.1965. J, s' William J. Nee, Mayor Attest: Marvin Brunsell City Clerk Hearing: First Reading: Second Reading: Published.....: i i AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO GRANT A FRANCHISE TO THE AMERICAN OIL COMPANY TO USE CERTAIN DESIGNATED STREETS AND PROVIDING CONDITIONS FOR SAID USE. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. 69.01 There is hereby granted to the American Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, its successors and assigns, for a period extending to December 1, 1990, from and after the acceptance of this f Ordinance by the American Oil Company, and subject to the terms and conditions herein stated, the right to lay and construct on pipeline across and through the City of Fridley, Anoka County, i Minnesota, for the purpose of transporting petroleum products, along and underneath.the surface of the public streets known as +; 53rd Avenue Northeast (easterly of 3rd Street Northeast) and 3r :, Street Northeast (between 49th Avenue Northeast and 53rd Avenue Northeast) all within the corporate boundaries of the City of. Fridley. SECTION 2. 69.02 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns in performing the work shall keep the streets open to traffic at all times,. and as soon as practical after laying, repairing, and constructs g said pipeline shall restore the streets to,a condition equal ox better than that existing before the commencement of the des- cribed work. SECTION 3, 69.03 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns, shall lay, construct, operate repair, and maintain said pipeline so as not ORDINANCE # PAGE 2 to interfere with the natural drainage of the streets and so as not to interfere with the'construction or maintenance of said'streets; and said pipeline shall be laid at such depth P, beneath the surface so as not to interfere with public travel. SECTION 4. 69.04 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns, shall lay, construct, operate, repair, and maintain said pipeline so as not to interfere with private entrances to land now abutting on said streets. SECTION 50 69.05 The Company, its successors, grantees!'and assigns, shall pay all damages to the owners of property abutting on the public streets which such owners may sustain ,by reason of the laying, repair or maintenance of` said pipeline. •. SECTION 6. 69.06• The Company, its successor$, grantees and assigns, shall assume all risks and liabilities for all accidents and damages that may accrue to persons or property on account of the laying, maintaining, repairing, and operating said pipeline, and by the acceptance hereof, agrees to indemnify and save harmless the City of Fridley from any.and all liabilities, damages or judg ments, including attorneys' fees and count costs in con:iection with the aforesaid. SECTION 7. 69,07 Said pipeline shall be located and constructed to the satisfac tion of the City Council of said City and should construction, and operation of the streets require any alteration or change of location of the pipeline, such alteration or change of location shall be made by the Company, 'its successors, grantees .� and assigns, at its expense upon written request from the City Council. 59 62 SACRED HEART OF JESUS CATHOLIC PARISH 420.22nd Avenue Norfh Easf ATTENTION OF: TO `_SaadP.� Wainer, -�C Ma_ager Msmo, No. 65 -57 SUBJ68I< Permit # 316 in 77th Wav,and Fir Street._ There are .no city uti ____hermit would not be a in this area that are ;'in these two streets However, there are approx to use other fuel supplies. would _be more money saved on heatLng Mpe se than would 1 sewer and water with natural gas already in. DATE 9113/65 ie installation of natural normal city policy, th nine small industries 1 k is ve It to be ble that them 63 Mr. Comstock has been consulted in reference to this and expressed the same opinion. SIGNATURE n.nl? DARM CLARK , nee�rng Assistant DATE SIGNATURE �1 _�.. 1 REPLIER'$ COPY — RETAIN FOR YOUR FILES :,.rig+ —?.° — — -- r-- r--- - + - -—" „�, —•, - -- .`�- 7`"4'3 !'71 yo..: ? r! 17 1 I oa t�31 r` y� I y 1 ,1 •ti�� 0 y , w r 11 L• 1 y j. ,, ! nl 1 4 y -n r f l t, yl b k• t ��. / GN.rh " .,!./ {f, �jr dPi' t1r4 J-i � Imlay r 65 IMiDIAND CONSULTANTS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS and LAND SURVEYORS 1410 COUNTY ROAD J MINNEAPOLIS INNE&OTA September 14, 165- .City of Fridley Fridley, Minnesota Attention: Earl Wagner, City Manager Subject: N.S.S.S.D. Project I -L Gentlemen: Enclosed are four (4) copies of an Anoka County utility crossing permit, prepared in behalf of our client the N.S.S.S,D. This application covers the tunneled crossing of Central Avenue, south of the Minnesota Transfer Railway, in Fridley. Please have this application approved on behalf of the City of Fridley at your earliest convenience and return three (3) copies to this office. Very truly yours; MIDLAND ONSULTANTSi INC. "I Paul K. Ruud, P.M. Enclosures (4) PKR: nn _ I i i I COMM OF ANOKA DMAR1m1BNT OF HICNAYS II 66 To be filled in by X90. Road 4Wrmit No. Application for permit for im tallation of Utilities or for placing of obstructions on State Aid or Munty Aid Rodds. North Suburban Sanitary Name of Applicant Smr 1214tr ct Address 1458 County Rd,, J, &Lao . Minn.. Party or organization performing work Petrovske & Ross, Inc. (Randall.B 1. Nature of Work Sanitary Seve of surface to be disturbed Ditccbb B. Location of Road Central Avenue South of MLB!>, Transfer Railway 3 Size and Kind of Pipe ..P,..r_ r Depth from Surface. Number and Size of excavations -` -- -moo_. one_on -each_ i�de_ -of ro- r 4. Whod of Installation or Construction �gkg4t S. Work to start on or after . ■■1 Seotnkj 13 , 19 �� ■�. ■.■. r■.■ 1■ r. n■ r+■ r.■.■ r. rr.■ ry■i■■r■■�r.�■r■r■■r�r.rr�r��ur 6. Approximate time necessary to complete work pour w�eekg,_ .. �r.■.rr�■.. T. Will detouri ng of traffic be necessary if necessary, describe rerouting _..... '!! N MEMO TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City Council MEMO FROM: Nasim Qureshi, City Engineer MIM DATE: September 159 1965 MEW NUMBER: 965-59 RE:* Construct-ion of 56th Avenue Under Street Improvement Project St. '1965 -1 The cemetery south boundry line lies on the middle of 54th Street between 5th Street and 6th Street, which leaves 30 foot right of way in this area open for construction of the pavement. On the southwest corner of the cemetery there are retaining slabs which extend further into street right of way and thus reducing the open right of way less than 30 feet. . We approached the property owners on south side of this right of way and acquirel the deed for 5 feet wide additional right of way from Lot 1, Block 15, Hamilton's Addi- tion to Mechanicsville. Mr. L. R. Johnson, owner of the next lot, i.e. Lot 30, Block 15, will be willing to give 5 foot 'wide additional right of way if the City Council will allow him to use this 5 foot wide area for the area requirement for a 4 -plex when he proposes to build it. The proposal is to build a 30 foot wide road on 54th.Avenue, but we might have to reduce the width due to the limitations of the right of way and side slopes. Also the pavement on 54th between 6th Street and 7th Street is being proposed to be built only 2 feet away from the property line to line up the pavement better with the pavement oI both sides of it. The.,sketch of this is attached herds ith. 67 N v ?9 14 ,.. -q ' 19 - ,�� 1 11.1 ... - - 1�` - - --�� " 1B - - � - "- - • • — .. r _ Ac 1 I ��. ,�.. !s'.rR; 'tali . ! R. ✓! �►, .. .. 1 --• • f �' I 'ter Ot� t �` �•�i.2AV' . �� P:! ,` ;, I � .I • J7rQ, r•ry0•� , Wd r .1 , � J I 1 + a . All w • r :!• V •, At _ t ... . O• L: 2G. 2d v � a � 6 . 1 i11 Z! 8, . , �..- 2j '� : '�+r.: .. ..v.r.w • •a 1 IL _ i ti 2Z 21 OL P/ t �r'O • .1 IYII''.�. j ZO Lae— le "Atow hr 4.1 �: T a � � ..� rtn.r.• rt•.2i ., ,- .r• %•, rri.i. Y� �..._ t.�a.. - .... o. ♦- � .� / o7e . / y�e „ ,*: �•o• 54 TH. AVE Nu 1 = Z Z9 i 1 '��. �9 ,� Z ,� 19 .4 A _ l arhrs uj ?s ' t • -.._. r .: 2: • S t P6_ . r t .y _ ��26 i� ?f _ , G _ e 2J* . t 2•S , it • // w' /1 ,+ rl • � 4 fr 7l 1 h 1 •\ s• r.rr� • 14 rt ,O .y � � iwt � w!, i .:rt.2. � � /•#t L`I iw a— •,2 'i N.E. ; v ?9 14 ,.. -q ' 19 - ,�� 1 11.1 ... - - 1�` - - --�� " 1B - - � - "- - • • — .. r _ Ac 1 I ��. ,�.. !s'.rR; 'tali . ! R. ✓! �►, .. .. 1 --• • f �' I 'ter Ot� t �` �•�i.2AV' . �� P:! ,` ;, I � .I • J7rQ, r•ry0•� , Wd r .1 , � J I 1 + a . All w • r :!• V •, At _ t ... . O• L: 2G. 2d v � a � 6 . 1 i11 Z! 8, . , �..- 2j '� : '�+r.: .. ..v.r.w • •a 1 IL _ i ti 2Z 21 OL P/ t �r'O • .1 IYII''.�. j ZO Lae— le "Atow hr 4.1 �: T a � � ..� rtn.r.• rt•.2i ., ,- .r• %•, rri.i. Y� �..._ t.�a.. - .... o. ♦- � .� / o7e . / y�e „ ,*: �•o• 54 TH. AVE Nu 1 = Z Z9 i 1 '��. �9 ,� Z ,� 19 .4 A _ l arhrs uj ?s ' t • -.._. r .: 2: • S t P6_ . r t .y _ ��26 i� ?f _ , G _ e 2J* . t 2•S , it • // w' /1 ,+ rl • � 4 fr 7l 1 h 1 •\ s• r.rr� 14 17 N.E. ; v ?9 14 ,.. -q ' 19 - ,�� 1 11.1 ... - - 1�` - - --�� " 1B - - � - "- - • • — .. r _ Ac 1 I ��. ,�.. !s'.rR; 'tali . ! R. ✓! �►, .. .. 1 --• • f �' I 'ter Ot� t �` �•�i.2AV' . �� P:! ,` ;, I � .I • J7rQ, r•ry0•� , Wd r .1 , � J I 1 + a . All w • r :!• V •, At _ t ... . O• L: 2G. 2d v � a � 6 . 1 i11 Z! 8, . , �..- 2j '� : '�+r.: .. ..v.r.w • •a 1 IL _ i ti 2Z 21 OL P/ t �r'O • .1 IYII''.�. j ZO Lae— le "Atow hr 4.1 �: T a � � ..� rtn.r.• rt•.2i ., ,- .r• %•, rri.i. Y� �..._ t.�a.. - .... o. ♦- � .� / o7e . / y�e „ ,*: �•o• 54 TH. AVE Nu 1 = Z Z9 i 1 '��. �9 ,� Z ,� 19 .4 A _ l arhrs uj ?s ' t • -.._. r .: 2: • S t P6_ . r t .y _ ��26 i� ?f _ , G _ e 2J* . t 2•S , it • // w' /1 ,+ rl • � 4 fr 7l 1 h 1 •\ s• r.rr� AMSuburbaxa Engineering, Inc. ?651 �?ea�xal due. '!�. �• %1 rowut aPla. VCe". 5543c Mr. Earl P. Wagner 6875 Sighway To. 65 51 e. .J�linntapolis, .�inrusota 5343+ 7&4 -6066 69 ,Associates Sobett %ndet, qZeq. engt. Um. e. Amen Reg. engt. Byton 9 Sneva —R q. emgt. e A 00A Rathbun, Reg. &avefat Evil & %unicipal e4w g -and Sutveyots land Manning Soil Besting • September 14, 1965 City Manager City of Fridley . 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Dear Sir: I am in receipt of your letter of September 10, 1965 regarding Storm Sewer Project Tin which you informed us the City of Fridley wished to engage us to review a drainage problem. As this work involves the review of a design of another engineer- ing firm who have prepared a report, I contacted Mr. Comstock of Comstock & Davis, who prepared the original report. I also saw the layout they have prepared. I know of no other solution to the problem, as I am aware that the existing line on Rice Creek Terrace from Rice Creek Terrace to the creek will not take any more water due to the size, so more catch basins at this point would be useless. I do not want to become involved in reviewing another engineer's work, so am declining this work. I wi.11 offer the suggfstion that the situation could be relieved on Rice Creek Terrace by in that , part of Comstock & Davis's plan from Rice Creek to 68th and Rice Creek Terrace, and make it big enough to be carried on if the remaining..portion becomes necessary. This would decrease the cost at this time ,considet ably and also keep the water off the section of Rice Creek Terrace that becomes.flooded. Yours truly, SUBURBAN ENGINEERING, INC. R. P. Minder RPM:mlz MEMO TO: Egrl P. Wagner, City Manager City Council MEMO FROM: Nasim Qureshi, City Engineer MM DATE: September 15, 1965 MM Nt1MER% #65 -58 RE: Extending of Storm Sewer Project #12 System to Intersection of Roman Road and Panorama Avenue . . Comstock and Davis, Inc., consulting engineers, inform me that the line in Roman Road could physically be extended to drain some of the water at.above mentioned intersection, but the line will have very little cover. I should point out that this line is not designed to pick up water from this intersection and the boundaries for the drain - ' age district of this project are already established for the purpose of design. The copy of the drainage district in this area is attached herewith. S The City of Fridley is in process of entering into an agreement with City of Columbia Heights and State Highway Department in regard to the storm sewer Project #12. According to this agreement, the design drainage district map will be made part of the agreement. Also the agreement requires that no party will drain any additional areas into this storm sewer system without first obtaining the permis- sion to do so from other parties. If City of Fridley, or any other party, wanted to drain additional area than the system is designed for, then the design frequency, i.e. efficiency of the system will be reduced. I would assume that the other parties$ es ?ecially State, will be quite hesitant to do that. Even if they agreed, they would expect Fridley to pay additional money to them as Fridley's share of the cost will be increased. .The line in Roman Road, going up -to Gibralter Road, only is part of the Project_#12 which is being called for'bid on October -ll, 1965, as discussed in the,Council meeting of August'16, 1965. NASIM QURESHI, P.R. NQ : ob i 70 L Z CAPI TO�s toi � • 52nd AV. I 1 1 `1' 11 I { + 14 V ui oor 1 50 V. �' _......... t P } �I'i; �ttt` +I it `,.'�'i,t'``� �1 ,;• J '�i j1l'�111 I�IU,I Ili ''' LTL r I ' I � i A4 Ia: PILOT aoNA¢ -�f i AV. AV. I , lo 2 10 1 i 49th AV. LIN I j ,, '17 171 I. � 1 I ,' - I ► I I i li,l � •II it '' � 1 i 1 � (l � ,� • �. I � � I 48th 47' /ZF "AV. 4 7th =Q "•V. ' �_ ;_1 '��! --- K 7�..' I_._..i� lC __ ... .... z LN 46-'/2 AVr;. i +' i n,rs;! 7 i, �I • . � � I -1j 46thA�. 7r _! Lsi, ,ra 72 BUIIAING BOARD MINUT88 SSPTBMBES 8, 1965 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rravik at 7:37 P.M. MOM PREMM: travik, Kirkham, Ellis, Wallace, Tonco (Ward 2) Rerdsr (Ward 3) VZOMA AIMS H tge (Ward 1) MUMS FRSml Steve .Hawrysh, ' John Akers, 'Clarence Graves, Eugene Graves There vas a discussion about the streets and driveways by the building. The drainag% and fire stops (in the buildingX were discuss". Motion for approval of the Building Permit was made by Wallace. Seconded by Herder. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Kravik declared the motion carried. 2. CONSVERPTiON :bP A DX SERVICE STATION 0-0 57TH AND UNIVERSITY: There was a discussion about the proposed driveways and service roads. Motion by Border to recom ad approval of the Building Permit. Seconded by Wallace* Upon a voice vote, theme being no na". Chairmn Kravik declared the motion carried.! AD�Tt There being no further business, Chairman Kravik declared the meeting adjourned at 8x16 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Olive L. Harder Secretary to the Board 4• ...f Grade W. 38egda Actum Seceetary 0 I'o FMINY SAFETY CONaTME MEETING MINu=S - SEPMBER 9, 1965 moo= PRESENT: Larsa4►, Linton, Frits, Weiss, Rossing, Szogda P80MM GRAVES GAS STATION - (57TH AND UNIVERSITY): Notion by Fritz that the proposed plans be accepted as presented with the exception of the driveways, which have been suggested to be changed to curb returns and that adequate drainage be provided. Seconded by Linton. Accepted. F00R WAY STOP SIGNS AT 61ST AND 778 Smmm NmTsum Mtion by Linton that four way stops on 61st and 7th Street be eliminated and in their place an arterial 'stop on 61st Street and the flashing sehool signals on 7th Street to control traffic.. • Seconded by Ro"Ing. Accepted. MW MEETING: the next meeting will be October 20, 1965, at 5 :00 P.M. is the City Kali. The meeting was adjourned at 8 :40 P.M. Respectfully aWmitted Grade W. 38egda Actum Seceetary 0 I'o 0 PLMDG CMWSSION ImEmr. SEl''lEMbB.R 9, 1965 $OLt M: PAGE 1 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kravik at 7 :40 P.M. Members present: Johanson, Bendel, Kravik, Bergman, Hughes Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Wagner, Engineering Assistant Clark ApjjM OF FLdNN1PiG CMWSSJON p - AUGUST 26, -1965: HMON by Hughes, seconded by Bergman, that the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of August 269 1965 be approved. Upon a voice vote, they motion carried.. ZEInoli by Bergman, seconded by Bendel, that the Planning Commiss receive the minutes of the Plats and Subdivisions Sub - Committee mesti of September 2, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Bendel, that the Planning Com®issic receive the minutes of the Streets and Utilities Sub- Committes meeting of September 2, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. 10 �COM PDSLlu Ate: L,ar L COMI'AN__. U C.: Pearson 's Industrial Park. That part of the SWt of Sk and SBA of SEA of Section 3 lying west of GN Railroad R/W and Bast of East River Road. Mr. Leonard Samuelson and Mr. James Pearson were present. Mr. Samuelson stated he had contacted the County and discussed vi them access on East River Road and believed there was adequate room a deceleration lase or service road. He was twder the impression that the County would like a divider island, but would consider a service road. Regarding access to East River Road, it was felt that, if possibl , one access would be preferable for the area, two at the most. The rwAmmendation of the Streets and Utilities Sub-Committee was a sesvi road without access off East River R©ad. The easement for the North States Power was to be checked into. it was felt by all parties con« cerned that more concrete plans should be presented for study, and tha the public hearing for the preiimivary plat be continued. 74 0 r3 Planning commission iieetilz Septwler 9$ 1965 Page 2 MMON by Bergman. secrraded by Hughes, that the requestor of the proposed preliminary plate P.S. #65 -03, S. G. Pearson Cam, Inc., being that part of the 5:TWk of SEA and SF.k of SA of Section 30 lyJM west of the Great Northern Railroad R/W and East of East River Road, make additional contact with the County Highway Department to mote completely define their proposed plan, keeping in mind limited access off Bast Rivas Road getting in writing, if possible, comments from the County as to the details of a physically separated service road and numbers of access from it, and return the request to the Planning Commission at the earliest possible time. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. 2, D LIC G. ZQA #6 04 t I- MD a Rezone Outlet #1„ Melody Manor 4th Addition from R -1 (single family dwelling) to C-1 (local business areas). Continue until the September 23r 1965 meeting. 3. QgKUM LOT $PLIT VEST: L.S.- #64 -08 s Lot 13 and Nk of Lot 14, Bloch 16, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville. NNION by Hughes$, seconded by Bergman, that consideration of the Lot Split request$, L.S. #64 -08, Orville Ratley, being Lot 13 and NBC of Lot 14, Block 16, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, be con- tinued until the neat meeting,, September 23, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. 4. CgHMM REZMaNG a JOHN THEISEN Y Zoning on HE corner of Mississippi Street and Highway fK7. Mx. Art Swanson4 representing Theisen's Market, incorporated, was present. MMON by Bergman, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commissin concur with the present zoning of the northeast corner of Mississippi Street and HWnray &W, Theisen's Market, incorporated, as adequate for construction of the proposed Red Owl Story along with parking require- ments consistent with C-1 zouing, that the Commission also indicate to Council concern that any building permit plan for construction be con- sistent with service road planning being carried on by the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority. upon a voice vote, all voting aye the motion carried. Committeeman Hughes stated the reason for accepting this motion I. that the City Code doss not, as he sees it, make any differential at all between C -1 and C -15. Restrictions to neighborhood sites apply to categories other than those listed in specification. From a standpoin of use, no difference. Any decision undertaken here opens to all kind of questions. Categories of permit usage in G -2 seem to be a differen type than that called for in C -1 -- different entirely from what is proposed here. No choice but to indicate zoning is proper. This may a point to look into in the future. "IP Planning Commission Meeting September 9, 1965 Paget 3 5. LOT SMIT NR MST: L.S. #u5 -09y, DONALD C]:SE SKI. Wk of .Lots 10 and ...a..._._ .......... -, _ __ �... 119 Block 2,, Spring Lake Park Lakeside, 24r. and Mrs, Dwa ld Cisewski and Mr. Olaf G. Johnson of Dalberg Realty were present. The problem, of easements along the boundaries between the lots was discussed. Engineering Assistant Clark is to contact the Northam States Pawer regarding the utility easement on the east side of the lofts. W. Cisewski agreed to have the certificate of survey for the Council. MOTION by Bergman,, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Coeaaia sign concur with the Plats and Subdivisions Slab - Committee and Street and Utilities Sub - Committee meetings of September 209 19659 regard the Lot Split requests L.S. X65.09,, Donald Cismrskis W� of Lots 10 and 118 Block 20 Spring Lake: Park Lakaside r mmending approval of than lot split and requiring a 25 foot dedication for a street from the North line of Lot 10,, taking 5 feat from the North line of Lot 1 and adding it to Lot 10,9 so that Lot IO is 100 feet long and Lot 11 is 115 feet long„ and appxwing a waiver of the lot area requirement upon a voice vote,, all voting aye,, the notion carried. 6. SZ=1 PATTEM: Lot 39 Block 15 des River Lots. Moon Plaza mul dwelling permit. Bernard Julkayski presented a new plan. It was agreed that it was not necessary to do agything with Charles Street under the nat plan. The Cor=dxsiou agreed crith the dedication of 25 feet along the north line of Lot 3 from east e0tga to the river and asked the City Maanger to contact the se: -cool atWni.str^ation for a similar dedication from school praperry,. MOTION by : Bergman,, seconded by Hughes., that the Planning Code sion concur with the Streets and Utilities Sub - Committee and approve street dedication for a plan dated September 78 1965 which involves a dedication of 25 feet along the east Line of Lot 3 for extension of Anna Avenue and a ded.icatioa of 25 feet along the north boundary of Lot 3 from east edge to the river. Upon a voice vote, all votini aye, the motion carried. 1sAT : There being no further buslueassq Chairman Kravik adjourned the meeting at 8 :00 o'clock. Respectfully submitted,, t /, Haze 0"Brian Recording Secretary 7 • FRIDI= wus= Am Rm=L0ff=T ADTRwnnf mmun - sSPr 1, 1965 Tb* Meting was Called to order by Chairman Herder at 8:20 P.M. ROLL Prevent: Chairman Richard Herder, Commissioners pawl Barrow and John Meyer, Zftoutive Director Allen Anderson, and Wyman Smith, Legal Consul. Commissioners Lois Mullin and Robert Kendall arrived later. Visitors: Mr. and Mrs. Wally Miskowic, Dana Jackson, Robert Christianson, Dr. Richard Trozona, Tore Hodne, and David Alberts. Absent: None A OTAL OF MIN M - IWrING (W AUGUST 26 1 6 The following correction is to be made in these minutes: Page 2, Director's Report - Staff Insurance paragraph i+s to be deleted. John Meyer made a motion that the minutes of the meting of August 26, 1965 be •approved as corrected. 11r. Barrow seconded. and the motion passed unanimously. C iONICATIONS - LTTTE�i FROX4 iONTEYTDHO RKCk'VEi.OPIMT AMUM Chairman herder received a letter from the Montevideo Redevelopment Authority with examples of their public infoxuation. After reviewal and di+scueaionl, the examples were filed for future reference ANNOUNCMTS pRILLIPS 66 Bum - PS NIIfi Chairman Herder stated that the Phillips 66 Compasay wanted a branding permit for their pQwperty. He further stated that the Company, had agreed not to build until Jens and would coop&rete with the PHRA pl and the road ply for the area.. Wyman Smith stated that the City and the State should deoide ghat the boundaries of the right -of -way wQrq to bps as soon es possible. Chairman Richard Herder stated that he had sent a letter (attacbed) to Rev. Gerald Keefe of St. William *e Church stating the intentions of the FM regarding the church property. Be then restated the reasons leading up to time sending of the letter for the benefit of visitors. • ANNWNCNTS - TAPE RCO€tDER Rcecutiws Director Anderson stated that the resolutions of the Bycidley Housing and Redevelopment Authority would be taped on a recorder to insure their tr&M tion verbatum. Page 2 • p'=UTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - TOUR OF THIS RIVERVI ABSA Mr. Anderson stated that on Saturday, August 28, 1965, at 2:00 P.M., moubers of the City,Counoil, Mayor Nee, the State Commissioner of Conservation and the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Commission had taken an extensive tour of the Riverview area and then retired to the City Hall for further discussion. It win the general consensus of opinion that this area would be used ontirel$ for pant spasms . Mr. Barrow stated that he had taken a second tour of the Riverview area and had spoken with several of the residents. The majority of the residents were in favor of the projaot but skid have osrtain questions and/or problems. ZcID MIU DIRIDC IS REPORT - CITY' CENM BUSINESSM IS MEWING Executive, Director Anderson reported that a meeting had been held Monday, August 30, 1965, with the businessmen directly concerned with the City Center project. It was their contention that they would like to further explore the bility of establishing a private development company to redevelop the area. stated that in order to conduct a feasibility study for this company, they woi need the following: 1. Estimates of the price that would be paid them for their property. 2. Estimates of the price the land would be resold at after clearance. 3. Sufficient time after these estimates had been received to incorporate 0 if they so desired. Prior to the submission of the Pant I Application, the Rousing Authority must br resolution develop a land disposal procedure. The ftecutive Director r*com"ndA that, in order to encourage local private development, the land be sold giving preference to owners displaced by Urban Renewal action in the City of Fridley. This would sesurw the current owner the first opportunity to re- purchase the land. This preference would be li:..ited by a 30, 600 or 901, day period to be determined by tbo Authority. The businessman also stated that they would want several of the buil.diages to "min as they are until the► new buildings were ereotod to assure little i4con- venience and loss of business during the interim. Mr. Anderson stated that the Chicago tMA did concur with this request. Robert Christianson, speaking for the businessmen, stated that tkoy were very pleased that tbaY had boon brought into the plans at this time. He further staff that if th oy did fora the afore- mexitioned company they would not want too rigid control over the type of shops erected and exact locations. Chairman Harder explained the type of control the Commission would exert, i.e. ample paarkibg, buildings mooting City Code requirements, etc. Dr. Tresona tban stated his problem conoersning his property. He had bought the residential property with the assurance that it would be rezoned to comseroial, 11 `79 Page 3 • sad had therefore paid a cownercial parics. Because of the current City Center plans, the resoning has not as yet taken place. Be would like the Authority to guarantee that.the property would be purchased from him at a commercial price rather than a residential price. One of the Commissioners stated that tlse Authority does not have the power to guarantee the appraiser's price. After a length discussion, John Meyer made a motion, "that the City Council be advised that the Housing Authority does not favorably review the resoni.rg of this property as commercial. property at this time; reason for this being that in the immediate fhtt" a building might be erected within the boundary of the rodave101 Sant area that does not coincide with City Center plans. However, the Authority Mould withdraw the o,,ejections if It could be assured that no structure would be put on this land until after the City Center plan is established." Dr. Tr*zom objectal to this motion. Robert Christianson stated that if the Authority wanted time cooperation of the businessmen they would have to meet then halfway. The motion was not seconded. Chairman Herder then directed Wyman Smith to prepare a draft resolution for the Authority's review at their next regular meeting. This resolution should incorporate boss Dr. Tresona's wishes and the Authority's objeotivos. $SPORT OF M. — ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE FOR CITY CENTER DOOMIE ITATION SJohn Meyer, A oommittee of one appointed by Chairman Harder at the Commission's meeting of Ja>gust 26, reported on his study of the requiested additional funds for further narrative on the City Center documentation. He stated that after discussing this with Tom Hodne of Hodne Associates, he did concur that Mr, ]Akin had tulfil -od his contract with than Authority. He further reeommmendsd that this additiozwO expenditure be postponed at this time and be reviewed at a later "to as the si motion warrants. Mr. Anda.-son stated that he would like to go on record as being in favor of the emxpendiiare for time additional narrative being made an soon as possible. Mr. Hodne a.so strongly r*co=andvA this expenditure now for the following reasons: it woull save time doing it now rather than at a later date, and would help accept, 000 of the S d P b ppl icat ion . Other reasons given for doing. this now are t the additional narrative will be needed in case of possible legal actions, and that It may have to be done eventually anyway. The o*►position .stated the following reasons% Z. It Mss felt that the estimated $1,2W cost of time work may not be sufficie to gave the result of the work required and that we Aav* no guarantee lbat it will be complete. 2. The question me raised as to whether the Work must be done at this time or could be dons later if the need arises. • 3. Iz is a passibility that the documentation that now exists will be 'And further documentation mi,gbt not be needed. 80 Page 4 • After a lengthy discussion, DIr. Meyer asked Mr. Hodne if he would ask the expezts that if they are required to submit a report that will stand up in court, is this estimated cost ,sufficient. Mr. Hodne agreed to do this, and the study rasa tabled pending a further discussion at the next meeting. U11FINISHO BQSn=S - UNIVLRSITY PROJECT S & P THIRD PAMCO� Chairman Herder, at the previous Meting of August 26. 1965, was direoted by the Cousission to execute the University Project S & P Third. Party Contract between FEHA - MA - Hodne Associates. The contract was signsd by Chairman $erder sad attested by Lois Mullin, Secretary- NEW BQSUMS - RI ERVIN S & P APPLICATION The contract was reviewed item by i.tom by the Commission and ro►presentativee of Hodne Associates. Mr. Hodne clarified the contract by stating that the costs cover only using *the land for park u"-. Mr- Myer moved that thO Authority accept Draft 3, Riverview mr*a S & P Application and direct out Executive Director to prepare the other papers necessary for submittal to the City CO=Oil • The motion was seeondod by Mr. Kendall and passed vnaenimously. NSW BUSH S - _SERVICE Rte? PLA RSS Mr. Anderson asked the Commission to adopt & resolution requesting the City Manager submit to the Highway Department the service road plans sae soon as possible. He then gavro the background information leading up to this request. Chsirmsn Herder than instructed Mr. Anderson to request the City Manager to release the planes now or as soon as possible. NN BUSINESS RRMT Mr. Rodne stated that he will give the Cousission weekly progress reports on the three study areas. These reports will include our actual progress to date and where we will be at definite time intervals. He further stated that he will have a graphical illustration ready for the Commission by September 6. Mr. Hodne stated that the City eeaster S & P application will be prepared and ready this vee;tkaend . Chairman Herder thew requested t o Smith to prepare the other supporting docu- ments for the City Center and the Riverwiew S & P Applicatiaaas ss soon as possible. M =Sims - POND ISSUE Chairman Hander read a memorandum he had drafted to the City Council rracoamending that a bond issue election be told at the same time as the gr&ral election. lair. Kendall wads a. motion that the Chairman be authorised to send the esmoa"sa&W to the City iomcil. Mr. Mayen aseconded.. Upon a voice Grote, there being no nays, said motion carried unanimously. ADJOURW There being no further 'Aaeivess, Mr. Meurer made a motion that the meeting be adjourned at 12:45 P.S. This motion vas seconded by Mrs. Mullin and passed unanimously. Respectifu,lly submitted, Lois Mullin Secretary Fridley Housing & RedevelopMent Authority Next meeting vill be hold Wednesday, September 8, 1965. 0 'i • an TO : City Council, City of Fridley FR0M: Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority RE Community (Development - Renewal - Improvement) Bond Election Gentlemen: The Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority is sufficiently advi:nced in its work`to be reasonably confident that three redevelopment projects are feasible and that Federal grants will be available to the city to assist in these projects. The projects are: 1) the University Avenue project, 2) the City Center project, . 3) the Riverview Heights project. The purpose of this memorandum is to advise you that our present estimateA of the net costs of these three projects to the City of Fridley is $968,400 and to recommend that you call for a vote from the people on a General Obligation Bond Authorization as part of the general election of November 2, 1965. We wish to stress that the above figure is an estimate based on our current research and planning. A more definitive figure will not be possible until our studies are complete and actual project proposals are made. The pre- sent estimate, however, reflects the upper limit of the net costs that can be reasonably expected from the proposeck renewal areas now under study. The earliest practical determination of public support is necessary., however, in order to delineate the project areas. We must be in a position soon to make firm commitments to the property owners involved concerning whether or not the public will acquire their property for redevelopment. The Authority is confident that the studies will be completed in time for a thorough review by the citizens of Fridley so that voters will be able to make a knowledgeable and rational decision on the merits of the Authority's findings. I ` - 2 - We also wish to point out that the studies indicate that any devel- opment undertaken could be staged in such a manner as to minimize inconvenience to the property owners and that the sale of the bond authorization could be spread out over a p '6riod.of time. The initiation of any project, of couise, depends on the concurrence of the City Council and Planning Commission with the specific recommendations of the Authora.ty. i a • j . e 1 i j FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I • August 30, 1965 w Rev. Gerald Keefe St. William's Church 792 Mississippi Fridley, Minnesota Dear Father Keefe; It has come to the attention of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority that there is a considerable amount of public misunderstanding over the activities of the Authority with respect to St. William's Church property. We would like to reassure you and the parishioners of St. William's that church buildings or land have never been considered'as candidates for urban renewal. Such a suggestion is not only unrealistic but completely contrary to fact. The Authority has always considered St. William's Church to be an outstanding contri- bution to the improvement of the University Avenue area. All of our planning studies have been orientated around the church property as well as other permanent facilities such as the Moon Plaza Shopping Center, the Fridley State Bank, and • the residential neighborhood. The purpose of urban planning is to develop upon and preserve the durable existing properties, for the mutual benefit of the entire. area. To be sure, all of the Authority's; working plans indicate the existing church property but only in recognition of its over -all importance to alternative development studies. This is done in order to evaluate all proposals so that conflicting property uses can be anticipated and, hopefully, discouraged. At no time, however, has church property been included in the relevant study areas of the Authority. Inasmuch as the detailed studies are still in progress, no decision has yet been made as to the feasibility of an urban renewal project. In the event that the Authority does recommend a project there is no possibility of the inclusion of church property in the project area. The service road concept recommenced by the Authority is perhaps the source of some of the current misunderstanding. The Authority made its service road recommendation on the basis of extensive study and consultation with safety, and traffic experts.' While the service road affecting St. William's Church is not in the renewal study area, it was the judgment of the Authority that the 'concept had many benefits for.property owners bordering the service road, the neighborhood served, and highway uses in general. It must be remembered, however, that the service road pattern is sti ll a plan and no definite road alignments have as yet been made. If the concept is accepted by the community it is very• doubtful that church parking areas would be Jn any way diminished. i I I I i I n U Rev. Keefe - 2 - August 30, 1965 The Authority considers our past discussions with you and other members of the church as being,very constructive and helpful. it is our intention to continue this relationship in the future so that the result of our work will be to the mutual benefit of the City of Fridley and St. William's Church. Finally, the�Authority appreciates the interest you and other parish- ioners have shown in �` work and we wish to ''encourage a continual appraisal of our progress. Our members are available to answer any questions that you may have or to discuss the renewal studies in general. Please feel free to call on any of the members or, to visit our office neat to City Hall. Sincerely, Richard Herder Chairman I John Meyer. Vice Chairman S i 85 FRIDLE'C HOUSING AND 1?jmE m,on= AmoRYT'Y ME�i`iNG - SEPT== 8, 1965 The meeting was called led to order sat 805 P .M . ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Richard Herder, Conmissionsrs John Meyer, Paul Barrow, and Lois Mullin, Executive Director Allan Anderson and Legal Consul Wyman Smith. Commissioner Robert Kendall arrived later. Visitors: Dr. Richard Trezona,'Haaarley Peterson, Elmer Binford Dave Alberts, Jim Harrington, the Graves Brothers, John Akers and Earl Wagner, City Manager. Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MEErING OF SEPTE B01 IF 1965 The following corrections are to be made in these minutes: Page 2, Director's Deport - Tour of Riverview Area. The following people also attended this meeting: The' Dire actor of Conservation of the State of Minnesota, and personnel from the Park Department of Minnesota. Page 3, paragraph 2, line 2 should read. ..... that the Housing Authority does not favorably view the ..... Page 3, parsgraph 6, line 5 should read: had fulfilled his con- tract with Hodne Associates. Page 3, paragraph 6, .ding 6 should read: ..... additional expenditure for City Center Doomentaati.on be poastpoaned at this time ..... Mr. Baa=ow made a motion that the minutes of the mating of September-1 1965 be approved as corrected. Mr. Mullin seconded. Upon as voice vote, there being no., nags, said motion carried unanimously. TREZONA PROPERTY Wyman Smith submitted a draft resolution for the Authority's approval and a memorandum from Maxtizn Lewis to Wyman Smith dated September 8, 1965, attached, discussing the legal aspect of zoning changes or likely changes in ai zoning ordinance affecting value of property. Dr. Trezona stated that this memorandum agave him enough assurance concerning his property and his legal position, and has mould not definitely ask_ that the resolution be passed. It was therefore decided that the resolution would not be adopted. FOON • BILLS AND CC32IZTNIC.ATIONS - LETTER FRAM M& DONAHOE OF . WILLIAK'S UM.CH Chairman Herder read a letter from Mrs. John. Mark Donahoe to Executives Director Allan Anderson inviting the D"tor to speak beftwo the members of St. William's Church on October 14, 1965. In the letter, fta. Dom suggested the title, "Urban Renewal - What, Why, Box" for the topic. Mr. Anderson stated that he accepted the suggested title and will represent the Authority at the above meeting. BILLS AND COMINATIONS IMM FROM FATM EMS OF 'EM. WILLIAM'S CHURCH Chairman Herder read a letter received from Father Keefe, dated September 1, 1965, giving a summary of the Churcht s ywi.tion. on Urbaa Renewal. BILLS AND COMi+IUTSICATIONS -- LMER FROM U'' CHICAGO Commissioner Paul Berow read a- letter from the Housing and Ro,.n Finance Agency, Office of the Regional Admini stroltor, Chicago, Illinois, dated September 2, 1965; subject: Report on Ilrban Renewal Field Visit of Wednesday, August 29, 1965. BILLS AND CO TIC ATIONS - WA.IM OF I,IE RIMS Chairman herder received the Waivew of Lien Rights by Robert Gladstone and Associates, dated Augant 24, 1965; and the Waiver : of Lien Righte by Cbiefto . Aerial Survey, Inc. dated September 2, 1965. These covered the work don* on the City Center F'eaeibi.lity Study. S` MUTM DIRMTOR' S RTMT - LTA OF WOMN V C TM a Ttecutivee Director Allan Anderson astsated. VAt he and J&m Mayor had given talks before 30 or 35 men - ras of the l=`xidloy Laagu ? of Woman Votere on Thursday, September 2, 1965, sae':, had received a ve..7 favorable acceptance. Tt U'i°M Iii =TOR' S IMMT - IMID,LET JAYC Mr. Anderson estettead that he end Yu-. PwU, Ba=ow had bfmn wed to giver talks before the Fridley Jaycees on Tuesday, Septembfo 7, 1965. Mar. Barrow stated timt it was a very i.nteraotimg meeting, however it turn*eA out to be ea debate between our representattwess and Mr. Gibbs and Mr. Gxserre who opposed urban renewal. -Mr. Anderson sst%ted that) they had not been prepared for & debate but he thought they had gained a !'little during the question and answer period. Chai. =n Border stated that he iiass sorry that ift had not been more informed of the intone of the meeting. MMCDTTVZ DOOR'S REPORT - MITATIC ?. TO MOR OF MR.GO �TORTH DAKOTA Mr. Anderson sstatod that the Fridley Leggue of Wown 'Votersa will have a general public rooting at the Fridley High School on September 30, 1963. This Ming will be a debate on the Praia and cons of Urban Renew ail . He • further stated that Mrs. Jackson of thi's organization had requested that the M Face 3 llayor of Fargo ba invited -to att-and the meeting on behalf of Urban Renewal. Mr. Inderson contacted Mayor Lashkowitz of Fargo on September 8 concerning this tweting =d the Mayor accepted the invitation. In as much as this is a League function, the League of Woman Voters will extend the formal invita- tion. The trip of the Mayor will inour no cost to the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority. EMUTIN's., DIRECT011"S RMIRT - URA AUDIT Mr. Anderson stated tMt the WL4, make a. practice of conducting a preliminary audit- vit-hin -ninety days after establishment of an Authority. The Auditor will be at the Fridley Housing Autharity around the end of October. He further stated that our accountant is worrzir-Z on the books noo so that the accounts will he propez6ly established at the time of the audit. EX-MUTIVE: DLIIECTORIS RMRT - STATUS OF S & F APPLICATIONS Mr. Anderson otatea that we have completed our portion of the City Center and the Riverview Project S & P Applications and are now waiting for the City Council Resolutions. He st�atsd -that the final documents should be in the mail by Friday, September 10, 1965. EXELMIVE DIRECTOR'S RMPORT - RELFWE3E_R12P1,ANS TO HICEWAY DEPARTMENT • Mr. Anderson stated that he had talked- i ith l Wagner, the City M&r4;gdr,, twice this week and Itr. Wagnor still contended that he haa neither the personnel nor the tim to complete the sartrice road plans. Mr. Wagner defended his position by aaying that he did not have any plans other than the thi,va he had received on the &rternoon of September 3, 1965. Mr. Anderson then X-emix.,ded him 41hwt lie had received plans from Bodne Asso- ciate's four to s Waeks Prior to thie datv- liv. wagnffi then stated that he had rocelved thase p1 -ans but tho'l It we es re r f owing. r to now plans. Mr. WacMer then suggasted that the Authork'Ay 1-hire an outside conaulting firm to draw -ap the plans for the �cightof-way- He stated that his, engi- neere uould be &=,Jlalble fcoc ans,;ie:cing quezntions but did not have the time to do the plavis themoselves. bh!,. Mayer asked Mx. 'Wfag-ner if he would object, to having the Highway Department draw up tentatiVe lines for the ri t= of- Mr. Wagner a�eed but stated that he did not th-id-r- that the Righvay lkapartment would be willing to do this Mrs. Mullin w.ked if the Commission hAd : the authority to hire a consulting firm for this pwcpose, exd Mr. Alber-1-11-5 said he thought this could be done an part of the Si-a-vay aad Plam-xing portion of the contract. After a ft-arther discussion, Chairman Eerder directed our Planner, Hodne Associates, to work wilkii the City MA_=,P*r and his engineer on this problem • to'see exactly how waoh vorl- will be required. He fuxther suggested that 0 Hodne Associates con-tact the Highway Department to see what their position is at this tire. 89 UNFIXISHW BUSIMS - REPORT OF HODITE ASSOCIATES It was requested at the meeting of September 1, 1965 that Hodne Associates report to the Authority on the gueotion of additional work required to com- plete the building inspections. Mr. Alberts, representing Hodne Associates, presented a letter sent to Roger Johnson requesting a commitment on the cost for the required amount of work. He stated! that Mr. Johnson had sent a return letter but it had not aB yet been rOceiaed by Hodne Associates. �q :. Meyer stated that he did not think the 'letter presented asked the questions the Commission had wanted answered. He then asked Mr. Alberts if flora Hodne would goerantee, from this letter, that the experts would submit as report thst would stand up in court and give all the necessary information suggested by the MA at the cost estimated, Mr. Binford, URA. field Representative, than comented that the Authority should: I. First show that thore is evidence that the area is a alum or blighting influence to a degree vaA.°:*unting clearance. 2. Establish not only that there are deficiencies but their cause and effect and determine how they esUblish a substandardness. He stated that the records should clesxly show'thaLt public action is definitely, • necessary and is the only say of solving the problems, and propably support these findings with photographs of defects where needed. 3. The inspectors are as good as any he;ham seam and he thought the Authority would want a definite atate nt i'rorn them on each substandard building. He stated that the existing rerord.s confirmed the first cosssagent but not the second. He there -fare reco ended that thv records be expanded as,suggested. He said the authority should require complete doc=entation on esch substandard building from the pla°a7aer. �!r. Meyer stated %at this was that we wanted anal he did not think this cost was feasible to produce a complete docmantaition on the causes and dangers on each building. The discussion was them tabled saila M-- Meyer stepped out to make a telephoner call to Mr. Josvwon to classify his position. When Mr. Meyer returned., he estated. that . t xere had been a misunderstanding and that after he WL explained to Mr. Johnson exactly what the Authority wanted, Mr. Johnson had agreed -that the cast would be considerably higher. Chairman Herder thee. appointed John Meyer; as a. committee of one to work with Hodne Associates in sending a letter to Roger Johnson stating exactly what was required by the Authority and a slking what the top price would be. 90 Page 5 UNFINISHO BUSINESS -> LETTERHEAD Mr. Anderson showed a final draft of this proposed lstterhead for the FM. The Coammission decided that middle initials should be included in the Commissioner's ns=s. Mrs. Mullin made a motion that the Executive Director be directed to order the stationary as corrected. Mr. Kendal seconded. Passed unanimous ly . MISCELLAXBOQS Mr. Barrow asked if he could have comparative figures from Hodne Associates on the cost and acreage of the three project area. Mr. Alberta agreed to this request. �,. • tx • fit:_►- � S?!Q3 Mr. Anderson asked the Authority to approve Resolution No. FMU 1965 -18 for the approval of the S & P Application.'',for the City Center Project area. Mr. Alberta of Hodns Associates presEented' a draft of the S & P Application and explained the char. €a that will be made in the final document. After a discussion,, this draft was approved. Mr. Kendall was then asked to read the resolution. Mrs. Mullin made a motion . that the Authority adopt Resolution No. FWU 1965 -18, Resolution of Fridley Housing and Rcdevelo -Lpe xt Authority Approving 11ndertaking of Surveys and Plans for a Disaster Project and Filing of an Application for the City Center Area. The notion wan seconded by Ift. Barrww. Upon a voice vote, there Ding no nays, said Nation carried unranimounly. M BUSINESS - MOL€i'l'1011 PHRA '!2§5=j21 I IDIRVIEW Mr. Anderson aukcd the Authority to approve Resolution. No. FWU 1965 -19 for approval of the S & P Application for the Riverview Project area. The draft of this Application had been approved by tha Commission at the last meeting, however Mr. Alberta explained on* small changes that had been made. There was some discussion on the boundary lines an stated in the resolution and Mr. Anderson was asked to rewrite tht aa. After doing so to the Commi.esion• s approval, Mr. Kendall made a motion that',the Authority adopt Resolution.No. F9RA 1965 - -19, Resonation of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Approving Vndertsking of Surveys and Plans for a Disaster Project and Filing of an Application for the Riverview Project an corrected. The motion was seconded by Mr. Meyer. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion carried unanimously. Nlyr! BUSn=S BUILDING PMMR FOR, GRAM PROPMTY The Graves Brothers and Mr. Ackers, their real estate agent, asked the Authority to approvo a building permit for fir AX Gas Station, and showed plans for the building. After a (discussion, it was decided that Chairman Harder would look into the mattjer further with the City Council concerning their decision on the Phillips 66 Station and then get in touch with the Graves Brothers. i Page 6 NW BUSIN S - OVERTIME FOR STAFF Mr. Anderson asked tho Authority for a decision concerning overtime of his staff. It was decided that Mr. Anderson could use his discretion in either paying time and one/half or giving equal time off, depending on work load. REW BUSIMS - PAY C"RESATION FOR EMIING HMINGS Mr. Anderson asked the Authority for permission to reimburse his staff for the evening meetings on a monthly basis via a supplementary payroll, stating that this would facilitate an easier, more uniform accounting system. There being no further bsasixaess, Vw- B&vrpu a motion that the Meeting be adjourned at 11:50 P -M- Nir. Meyer seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Next meeting will be Segbomber 15, 1965- L� Respectfully submitted, 91 Troia Mullin Secretary Fridley Housing & Redevelop ont Authority TO: Wyman Smith FROM: Martin Lewis DATE: September 8, 1965 Question: What is the law as to the right to show changes, or likely changes in.a zoning ordinance as affecting the reasonable value of property "b"eing.acquired in a condemnation action? Discussion: Section 13 of Article I of theiMinnesota.Constitution pro- vides that private property shall not bejtaken, destroyed, or damaged for public use without "just compensatioo4', therefor, first paid or secured. Section 4 of Article 10 provides that land may be taken for a public way, for the purpose of granting to a corporation the franchise of way for public use, if a "fair and equitable compensation" shall be paid for the land and the "damages" arising from the taking. Thus it has been said that tolcompute "just compensation ",.the highest and best use may be shown. On this point, Palmer says: "...The rule is well established.that market value of property taken is not limited to the value of the property for the purposes for which it is being or actually been used. The value may be based upon the highest and best use; and so the value should not be limited because the owned was too ignorant or too uninterested to take advantage of the full possibilities of his property." Palmer, Condemnation Law(1961) §77:. That our exact question h4s- not escaped the attention of the treatise writers is clear in 1 Orgel, V�luation Under Eminent Domain'.'. j §34 where it is said: , "The courts have had little difficulty in reaching what seems to us to be a proper result in cases in- volving zoning ordinances. It is generally held that although an ordinance may prohibit the use of the property for certain purposes!at the time'of condem- nation, yet.if there is a reasonable probability that the ordinance may be changed r an exception made, the Value for that purpose as affected by the existing or- dinance may be— considered." ` it k 93 i The above section of 1 Oregel cites Long Beach City High School District of Los Angeles v Stewart,. 30 Cal 2d 763, 185 Pac 2d 585, 173 ALR 249(1947),where the plaintiff while taking the defendant's • property for a school was successful in limiting the defendant's wit- nesses to testimony based upon probable uses of his property within existing zoning laws. Defendant had acquired the property in 1905 and later built a dwelling house, barn, storeroom and shed. Still later he built a garage and small repair shop. On three sides of defendant's tract the development since 1905 was residential. On the fourth side was located a Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way. There had been no industrial development except a tores and beer parlors. V In 1941, this property was zoned into a single family residence dis- trict. Thereafter the defendant's shop was operated under a "non- conforming use permit ". Defendant- appellant contends; "(1) the jury was erroneously instructed to limit �- this consideration of value to the use to which the property might be put under -existing zoning ordinances; (2) the testimony of appellant's; expert witness was erroneously limited to statements as to value of the land for residential purposes; and (3) the court erred in refusing to permit appellant to testify as to the reasons for his opinion as to value." • The court affirmed the decision of the lower court ;.and said; "...the general rule is that present market value i must ordinarily be determined byconsideration only of the uses for which the land 'is adapted and for which it is available.' 'The exception ' to this general rule is that if the land is not presently.available for a particular use by reason of a zoning ordinance or other restriction imposed by law, but the evidence tends to show a 'reasonable probability' of a change 'in the,'near future' in • the zoning ordinance or other restriction, then the . effect of such probability upon :the minds of pur- chasers generally may be taken into consideration in fixing present market value.11�173 AIR at 254. 94 Accord, Beverly Hills v. Anger, 110 Cal-App. 626,294 P 476 (1930). However, �f the possible change in a zoning ordinance re- stricting the use of the property condemned is purely speculative such possibility is,not to be considered. :See Long Beach ... v. Stewart, supra. The Minnesota Court has had: occasion to consider this question. In Duluth and W.R.Co. v. West.51 Minn 163, 53 NW 197(1892), a railroad company's proceeding to condemn land for a right -of -way, it was held that the owner.in.question was entitled to introduce in evidence . a statute extending the.limits of Duluth so as to take in the land, even though the statute was not to take effect for three years. By far the most important decision in Minnesota on this ques- tion is State v. Pahl, 254 Minn 349, 95 NW'2d 85(1959) where in con- sidering this question, the Court said; "Existing valid zoning ordinances may prescribe or limit those uses which may be considered in proving market value. Evidence of value for uses prohibited by an ordinance may be introduced and considered only where there is evidence showing a reasonable probability that the ordinance will be changed in the near future." •95 NW 2d at ;90', See also State v. Casey, 263 Minn 47, 115 .NW 2d 749(1962) where the condemnee based the damages to his gravel. pit upon the delayed i (7 years) use as commercial building sites. The Court said; � " ..The`measure of compensation -in Eminent Domain, 17 Minn L. Rev. 461: _. ' ..evidence of the different advantageous uses to which' the property is adopted in its present conditions is admissible, and likewise any use' to which the property might be put in the future ought' to be considered, if such use is sufficiently practicable and probable as to be likely to influence the price which a present purchaser would give for it.' " 115 NW 2d at 754.' 95 In a case note of the Stewart cAse, supra, the student editor at 46 Mich L. Rev. 488 argues that the trial judge, not the jury, should decide as a preliminary question of fact whether the evidence indicates a reason ;ble probability of change of the zoning ordinance. Then if such probability exists, evidence!of ::value for restricted uses could be presgnted for consideration'of the jury. Conclusion: Evidence of likelychanges in the zoning or- dinances which are--not purely speculative'As admissable to show the highest and best use to which a dondemne& property can be put. t z 96 R101VOTION NO. V�MA 185--18 RESOiTYPION OF F'RIDL ff. 9WSMG AND - ODOR AUMORI Y A1'1=i1;aVt= UCUTAXM 07 SURMS AND YKANS FM A DISASTIR PRO.T cT FILING AM OF AN AM I TIOIN (City Ceatl pr AM) VEMMS, under Title I of -the Rousing Act of 7949, as ameaadod, the Howi.ng and Rom Finance, Administrator nistrator is authorised to extend fissancial anwistance to a log: ality for the planning and un"rtaking of an urban renewal project in are urban arai which than governing body of the locality certifies, and the Administrator finds, is in need of re- developmont or re Oi litation as a result of a catastrophe which the President has determined to be a =%Jor disaster.; and WaAS, the City fof Fridley, has, by resolution duly adopted on the 8th day of September, 7965, Corti ied that the &vea hereinafter • described in an =bran area in need of reiievelo pmsnt or rehabilitation as a result of a catastrophe tphi ch the ftessident has detemined to be mJor disaster; wd WHM S, Title V1 of -fie Civil llisbte Act of 1964, and the regulations of the Rousing and Romer F'UMnoff Agenoy effectuating that Title, provide that no person shall, on the ground of race, color or national origin, be excluded from Wticipation in, be denied the banr- fits of, or ba subjected to discrimination in the undertaking and drying out of urban rwuroal projects sssistai under Title I of tke Rousing Asst of 7949, as ammnded q and WMEM, it is desAimble and in the public interest that the Pridloy Housing and Redevelopment Autho�ity prol*" saxrveya and plana, • presently estimated to cost approximstely Seyonty -one thousend eight hundred thirty -fire and no /10,� ($77,835.00) Dollars in order to 9'7 0 undertake and carry out an urban rwwv&l project of the character con- templated by Section III of Title I, in that certain area, proposed as an Urban Ren&Wl Area,, nituateed in the City of Fridley, County of Anoka, szid State of Minneess ;bt&, and described as follows: "City Co nter Project Area" bounded generally as follows: Commencing axt University Avenue and Mississippi Street easterly along Mississippi Stiwet to a point approximately 300 feet easterly of Fifth Street. than south approximately 450 feet, ther. westerly 300 foot to Fifth Street, than southerly to 64th Avenue N.E. then westerly along 64th Avenue N.E. to University Avenue, continuing westerly along Sa►telite Dane to 3rd Street N!.$., than northerly to Mississippi Streeet, then easterly along Mississippi to University Avenue. NOW TBRIWUBE, BE IT RE OLVEV BY TU =24ISSI4I+tERS OF TO PRIDLRY RMING AND R1IDVMPMMT AMMORITY: 1. That the proposed Urban Renewal Area described above is an urban area in need of redsvelopmennt or rehabilitation as a result 0 of a catastrophe ~:hicks the President, pursuant to the provisions of Public Law 875. 81st Congress, as amended, has determined to be a major disaster area, and is appropriate for an urban re=newal project; that the undertaking by tine Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authamrity of Surveys and plans for an urban renewal project of the character cony tomplanted by Section III of Titles, I of the Rousing Act of 1949. as aaanaded, in said proposed Urban Reanewal , in hereby approved; and that financial assistance under Title I is nesded to amble the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority to fiinane:e the ubdertalring of the Project. . 2. That it is cognizant of the conditions that am imposed in the undertaking and carrying out with Federal financial assistance of an urban renewal project of the character contemplated by Section In of Title I, including the, following requirements; (a) that the eontxaot for temporary loan or capital grant for the Project shall specify a M • date for compliance with the workable program for comity improvement requirements of Section i0l(c) of Title 1; (b) that the urban renewal plan shell be &yprov d by the City Council of the City of Fridley; (c) that local gmnts- in-&id, consistins of donations of cash, land, demolition or resaovra work, and the installation, construction, or reconstruction of strosts, utilities, parks, playgrounds, or other Improvements or the provision of other publics buildings or facilities necessary for carrying out in the Urban Renewal .Ares the objectives of the urban renewal plan, shall be provided in an amount which, together with the Fedeereal capital grant, will be generally equal to the differ- once between Gross Project Cost and the p1 roceeds or value of ]project land sold, leaned, or retained for uses in accordance with the urban renewal plan; and (d) that there shall be pr*p=ed and carried out s • plan for the oncouragermmat, to the maximum extent feasible, of the provision of dwellings suitable for the farads of individuals: and families displaced by the major disaster or by r"irmlop wat or rebabilitation activities in comeetion with the Project; and it is the wean" of this body that such oonditione can and will be corm >lieed with. 3. T1wt the United States of! A i erioa and tho IIaosing and Home Finance Administrator be, and they hereby are, asawared of full ampliance by the Fridley Houning and Redevelopment Autboerity vith regu- lations of the Housing and Home Finance Agency effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rigbts Act of 1964. 4. That the filing of an application by the Fridley Houma$ and Redweiopewnt Authority for an advance of funds from the United States of Auerica. in an nmmt not to ej�aeeed Seventy -one thousand eight hundred thirty -five and no /100 WIA35 00) Dollars for surveys and r-7 L -A 0=0 m-m-A plans for an uro= rem-nml umjeect in tb* Urban Renwal Arm described Above is bj*r*by app2-owod, and *.,;tt -th% CJ=i.-m= is hexvby anthorized. and directed to exacuta and Jrile such appli"tion wit;h, the Housing and Rome Finance Administrator, to pv-wrida mich additional informtion and to furnish such dcouments as rzuy be required by said Administrator, and to act as the wuthorizat% rust: eent-ativo of th-0 Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Autb/wity, ADORED AT REGMAq MEfR114G ()p I=- PRIDM HOUSING AND REDSMDP- MINT AUTHORITY OR T U-11 Oth day of Saptembemr, 1,q65- • Richard Herder, Chad-mm ATTEST: Lois Mullin, Secretary 100 RESOLUTION NO- SM 19&19 • RESOLUTION OF P'ftIDLHY HOUSING AND R MVM, -- MWT AUMORITY APPROVING MERTASING OF S`CR Y3 AM PUNS FOR A DISASTER PROJE OT AND FILING OF AN APPLICATION. (Riverviev Project Area) 4fIMEA8 , under Title I of the Housing Acct of 1949, as amended, the Rousing and Rome Firuwa* Administrator is authorized to extend financial assistance to a locality for the planning and undertaking of an urban renewal project in an urban area which the governing body of the locality certifiers, and the Administrator finds, is in need of re- development or rehabilitation as a result of a catastrophe which the President has determined to bas a major disaster; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley bas, by resolution duly adopted on the 8th day of September, 1965, certified that the area hereinafter described is an urban area in need of redevelopment or rebebilitation as a result of a catastrophe which the President has determined to be major disaster, and WR2R A.S, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the regulations of the Housing and Hos* Finance Agency effectuating that Title, provide that no person shall, on',the ground of race, color or national origin} be excluded from participation in, be denied the bens- fits of, or be subjected to discrimination in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects assisted under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended ;.and WKERMS, it is desirable and in the public interest. that the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment .Authgrity props" surveys and plans, presently estimated to cost approximately Seventy -nine tbounwkd seven hundred sixty -nine and no/WO ($179.769,00) Dollars, in order to 101 • undertake and cwry out an 4 "ban removal project of the aba -acter Con- templated by Section III of Title I, in tk at certain axes, proposed an an urban Renewal Area, situated in tae titg of Fridley, County of Anoka, and State of T- nneaota, and deveriW as follows of a catestropbe vhich the Pkesident, parouvat to the provimiorm of Public Law 875, 81ot Con as, as &mnded, hmB detamined to be a major • Of Title 1, including the foll6viAg req. nte; (a) that the contract f .. ;- r -'at -r;. � <..,.. 1 F i F 7 102 date for cowtpli&nxce -dith 41:he ucakablr, pr ogre for community iYAPrOv*- ment requirem-ents of Section 101(c) of Title 1; (b) th&t the Urban renewal plan shall t� approved by the City Cowicil of the City of Fridley; (a) that local of donations of cash, land, demolition or removal work, &z.d the i_natsllation, construction, or reconatruction of str"ta, utilities, parks, playgrounds, or other improvements or t1he provision of other i ,public buildings or facilities necessary for c&rry-.11mig out in the Dr Renewal Area the objectives of the urban renc-.A! plan, ah&ll be provided in an awunt v&ich, togetbor with the Federal c&pital grant, will be generally equal to the differ- once between Gross Project Cost and tho pro-c&a" or value of project land sold, leazed, or retained for une in accordance vith the urban 2vnewai plan; and (d) -Uiat there shall be preppxed end. carried out a plan for the emcouragement, to the wxiarwmi extent feasible, of the provision of dwellJ-n,-e,-s sult6ble for the needs of individuals and families displaced by the major diewtor ar by radvvalopwnt or rehabilitation activities in connection with the _Project; and it is the none* of this body that such acynditions can and -will be complied with. 3. 11hat the Miited Statea of America and the Housing and Home Finance Adminiat- ator be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the Fridley mousing and R i ederrelopment Authority with reg- ulations of the lWasing &,,,"zd How Fiwu-ice Agancy effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rigbti_2 Act of 1964. 4. Th�t, +U-ie filing of rat app �plication by tkw Fridley Housing and Redtvelopmnt Luthority for an advBoca of funds from the United • i SUtes of America in an -amount not to exceed Seventy-nine thousand seven btuidred aixty -nine and no/100 ($79,769.OU) Dollars for surveys and I IS pia n a .fox, an a..ar xvnotipaj. °s:1 act xm 1fie iir,"' Rom ml Area da soribad A-I&avo is b*re +y appxove ., and, th-sst the Cheri. ma is bs —zeby anthorlsed and directed to �,qcut�v esnd file auch Itpplication with the Housing and Rome Finance AdmiristrabWx, to -;e ovicia auch additional inforvtion said to furnish such dommnts az :,-ay be r*r4uJxv1 by said Administrator, and to act w-, the mix n ^i .sed reyvem enta ai 'vo of the rid-ley Housing and R.o- lovolop lent Authority, ITAW AUMORITY ON L4:1a &Lb day of S&ptambar, 11,;65♦ AT: Lois Mullin, Secretary . m. �o. �wwer• �sw�rwa+.r+ �.+ �. r r,aew.r..ro�r.�.,�..�arri.r.n�. 103 NAB AND ADUMS . Carlson- Lavine, Inc. 2831 Aldrich Ave. So, ,_ Minneapolis, Minn. (Brick Lavine) Northland Construction 6230 Sunrise Drive Fridley,- Mims. (amerson Burns) BID BOND { A'�lMM C0l�L8'1'IOti Vm ....�w�....ru.t.�r�ri.�� rrr,r.�r�rrrrY J- a� Ct$D,Oa ^ , 8 CJ &lap 60 '2 Cd 105 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT s .• ; CITY OF FRIDi,Ei�s : MiNNBSOTA f I -i 4; . -1 ; 1- n OWNERS NAME. &.L.�..!/ s. ViQ. BUILDER ADDRESS (•D,3111,C) . .STS Ar ADDRESS _ r. r LOCATION OF BUILDING „, Not C�.S C% STREET , , y Sr- AT ` AST OF LOT Ali ` LOT BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION c, y CORNER LOT. INSIDE' LOT SBTBACK ; S f`!: SIDS -YARD -- ....., r SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION SVA ON'-, rysx Applicant attach to this form Two. Certificates of SutOey "ef Lot 'Mind 'pt'opoae� building location drawn on these Certificates. 2UOfi sca7rf�iil -n. � r7 \ bts6IPTION' OF i1U1CLDI1NG, ; :r: }; •'l .i?d.t :'i) t{t?f: U� r ".' t •�'ti ti .. +: i ra?tS �JI$ o be used' is.*- Front - Depth_,Z,&_Height C Ft el u. . �..__ groat Depth geight Sq. Ft. Cu.-Ft. }• �cr� Type of Construction 4t) r Estimated Cost S so i- To be completed -f r) ~ f s The undersigned hereby makes application fora permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with`the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department.of Buildings,;and hereby: declares that all the facts and representations, stated in'this applicationnr xc�sxalt are true and correct. DATE iT ` �•3 ,9L tS SIGNATIJRS , , J4 i C ci a n•a a i 2 (Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side). �q .^r I1•G��'i.7/ I . Q' C`jR �{�1G -h ,�10�1.. -Mh _. ..5:• /r r ,,.7_fT . /.:'l:�t �t.r.{7 . Y "" f.f r . / -'. r t 'r:_t.• �:, •� b.:Ad« .. Ld`tiil � ft i, fySi .r y ►U '. "_1 f7S ±_sr,��t i i J7^ "T 77 v .Li.7 °. -.• �)t:+.tf..,�a "ri$ I 107 ' APPLICATION FOlf BUILDING PERMT CITY or FRIDLEY, =MINNESOTA '`j%:,7T S 1" Y tfr "! "' i ti ) is " OWNER'S NAMB ' BUILDER ADDRESS ADDRESS ,, '' , ► LOCATION OF BUII.DI O •. $treat 'Part of Lot .; OCK . LoT � ADDITION OR SU$DIVt310N Corner Lot�Ins ide LOT r 'Setback' SEWER ELEVATION FATI M Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed— ,�',�,T building location drawn on these Certificates. -•--- < DESCRIPTION OIL 1b ba tbe used as Front Depth, Height—Sq. Ft.. cu., Ft. V. Front, Depth' j Height: f q. Ft. Type of Construction Estimated Cost ;t To be completed c:. 1 The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein'specifled, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department , of -Buildings, ndnd'he eby declares thit'all the'; `facts and representations stafed -` Ia this•.. application true 'and., Correct: nt oe DATE .-fy --`. �SLGNATIJRS ' N. 108 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT Permit No. JVLocation Fridley, Minn., FRI m IlJSPBCTOR OF B=MMS: The undersigned hereby makes applioation for a permit for the work herein speoi- fied, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rul- ings of the-Department of Building9j, and hereby declares that all the facts and re- presentations stated in this application are true and correct. M- Owner Kind of Building Used as Mork to be completed about 19_,,.,,,,,_ _ Estimated Cost q2 r DESCRIPTION How Installed: Flatwise on Extended out fra:a Wall Roof Dimensions h p Height /� _, Thickness Distance from Sidewalk Roof Constructed of: Iron, Wood., Iron and Wood Illuminated Wiring Application No.� , *N Signed 41Y 19 105 Form No. 2558 11/63 , STATE OF MINNESOTA RIGHT OF WAY DIVISION DEPARTMENT Of HIGHWAYS PARCEL LAYOUT SKETCH L COUNTY �na a PARCEL NO. s%ZZAG pat, OWNER /�a✓ ..�", Coos Santa t• a./?2r._fe. Show North Arrow Topographic information requiredt Outline and location of all buildings and improvements. Lot lines and dimensions. " Interior arrangement of buildings and equipment If teatcangs- . t meat is necessary due to R/W taking. e Strccc or highway frontage. Proposed R/W Iine and access taklag. r '• 1 AL r t { 1 Bd� r i,�e wai�ir �$77 �f • • 4 > . t t: 0 C L A t x s Goneral and Public Utilities 6363 through 6523 L3quw 7806 through ''856 W SSTV%TBS TO 8N APpW= By T= CITY CouNCIL - SBPTBMBSR 20# 1965 Keys Well Drilling Co. 413 No. Lexington Parkway St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 8atimate #6 - Water Improvement Project No. 75 -A (Partial) (Three Additional Drift Wells) $ 10;130.85 Johnson Bros. highway & heavy Constructors, Inc. P.O. Boas 1002 Litchfield, Minnesota 8atimate #3 - Water Improvemmnt Project No. 34-0 (Partial) (Crossing - T.B. #694 - Johnson street, 7th Street) $ 7,086.37 Barton Contracting Co. 10300 89th Avon* North Osseo, Minnesota Natimate #1 Water IWrovement Project No. 75-F (PArtiat) (T.B. 047 Wate w"in relocation) $ 7v778.94 F. D. Chapman Construction Co, and Randall- Barglin ( a joint venture),. 2809 Alabama Minneapolis, Minnesota Natimate #1 - Stoma Sewer Impraveemsnt Project No. 73 and Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improvement project ) 8 294.58 no. 73-�A (Partial) ( 54th & InnstiCk 5th $ , D. W • Haratad CMVMWN IBC. 7101 1ighwa4Y 065 NA, Fridley, Miuneaote 55431 $stiwete #1 - Ton ado Da wge - Fridley Fire Hall $ 16, 232.76 gst3matel #+1 - ACUOU for Civic Cantnr $ 1.874.11 Comstock & Davis, Inc, Consulting $ngintere 1446 County Road Vu Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 For Resident Inspection 6 supmVisiom for staking out of Cronu.fiaructioam wWk 112 ZSTIPATES To BE APPROVED BY TES CITY c _ CIL - sBPTS 1 19 P. 20 v 1965 • (Continued) Comstock & Davis, Inc. (Continued) Estimate #5 - Water Improvement Project No. 34-0 (Crossing - T.H. #694 - Johnson street, 7th street) $ 484.50 Estimate #10 - Water xWrovament Project No. 34-0 -2 (Pua><sing Installation and pwWhouse - Well 06 - 600 62nd AvQnU* Northeast) $ 42.50 Estimate #14 - sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement Project No. 67 (1964 Sanitary Sewer and Water PrQ9r8M $ 12.50 Estimate #6 - Water Inprove not Project No. 75 -A (Three additional Drift Wells) $ 256.25 Estimate #9 - sanitary sewer and water Imrovement Project No. 70 (Riverview Terrace, south of Mississi- ppi Place: Lincoln (Ashton) Streotr south of Iroatoe - Street= 5th Street, south of T.H. #100), $ 62.50 Estimate #1 - Sanitary Sewer, watof, and Storm Sewer Imtrovement Project No. 73 -A (Innsbruck 5th Addition) $ 52340 Estimate #4 - Water UWovement Project No. 75-0 (Booster station -,63rd Avenue U.So and T.H. #100) $ 116.25 Estimate #11 - Storm Sewer Iiprovt Project No. 5 -B (North of T.H. #100, bast of T.H. #47) . $ 20.00 Estimate #1 - Storm sewer Improvemwt Project No. 73 (54th Avenue Northeast) $ 317.50 $ 1.835.00 LJ n U LIST OF CONTRACTORS LICENSES TO BE APPROI19D BY CODMCIL SEPTSWZR 20, 1963 GAS r Maus Heating Company Route #3 Osseo, Minnesota by: C. R. Maus NEW BRAY. H b Y Construction Company 5529 Penn Avenue South Minnespolis, Minnesota by: Herbert S. Garber& NEW Sweasoa, Incorporated 5"2 Jackson Street New Brighton, Mium"ota by: H. J. Swenson NEW Zachaan Construction Company 3359 Central Aveaius, M.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota by: Jams A. Zachsaan M6W HBATIN Aviles Plumbing i Heating, Inc. 779 Bast 7th Street St. Paul, Minnesota by: A. Walter Avoles NEW Means, Heating company Route #3 Osseo, Minnesota by: C. R. Maus MEW Suburban Reating Company 2050 White Bear Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota by: Raymond Chem NSW OIL HZATINC Ssnbnirban Nesting Company 2050 'White Bear Avenue St. Fault Minnesota by: Raymond Ghsma NEW ROOTING Al Jarvi Construction Company 6232 Parnell Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota bye At Jervi NEW 67n, SPE 116 a ORDINANCE NO. 117 Is AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAS 1966 THE CITY OF FRIDLEY ORDAINS: SECTION 1: That the anneal budget of the City of Fridley for the fiscal yeas beginning January 1, 1966 mbich has been submitted by the City Iuuwr and modified and approved by the City Council is hereby adopted; the total of the said budget and the major divisions thereof being as folloast REVS= AVAILABLE CURRENT 109VEM t General Property Tau . Licenses and Permits . Fixes and Forfeitures. From Other Agencies. . Service Charges. . . . Non - Revenue Receipts . TOTAL GEMMAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR OTHER FUNDS: . $ 484,403.00 . . 47,830.00 . 17,400.00 101,343.00 . . . 69532.00. . . . _111,700.00 $ 7699208.00 Debt Service Fund - Parks. $ 33,945.00 Public Employees Retirement Fund . . . . . . . 19, 424.00 Firemen$s Relief Fund Insurance Refund. . . . . e 49850.00 Mill Levy . . . . . . . . . 149440.00 State Aid - HLSWays. . . . . 94,674.00 Debt Service Fund - Ietiprovament Bonds . . . 52,170.00 Debt Service Fund - Civic Center Bonds. . . + 21 815;00 TOM $ 241,318.00 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 11,010,526.00 GENERAL FMD: City Council. . $ 19,300.00 City Man age= °s Office . . . . 35,781.00 Mnenicipal Court . . . 17,945.00 Elections & Registrations 11,740.00 Finance . . . . . . . . . 519532.00 Auditing. . . . . . . . . . . 4,600.00 Legal . . . . . . . . . . 92820.00 Boards &'Commissions. . . 49765.00 Buildings & Grounds . . . 2911595.00 Police. . . . . . . . . . . . 1679294.00 Fire . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62, 868.00 Building Inspection . . v. .....32,434.00 Civil Defense . . . . . . . -7,241.00 Engineering . . . . •.. . 31,34 .00 Public Works. . . . . . . . 126,618.00 Street Lighting . . . . . . . 271,296.00 Sanitation & Health . . . . . 8,975.00 Parks, Recreation & Banda . . 96,265.00 Health & Hospital Insurance 7,550.00 Library •.. . 1,250.00 Reserra . . 15 000000 TOTAL GENERAL FOND 769,208.00 P.E.R.A.. . . . . . . . . . $ 19,424.00 Firemen °s Relief. . . • . 19,290.00 Debt Service - park Bonds . 339945.00 State Aid - Hioways. . . . . 94,674.00 Debt Service - Improv. Bonds. 52,170.00 - Debt Service - Civic Cent. Bds. 21 815.00 ,TOTAL IF Z4x,,315.UU TOTAL ALL FUNDS X1,010,526.00 SECTION 2: That the City Manager be directed to cause the appropriate accounting entries to be made in the book# of the City. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY TM CM COMM TBIS DAY OP ATTEST William J. Nee MAYOR First Readings HErrs C. , City Clerk Second Reading: Pbblish: _�..�.�_... . . HALL, SMITH, HEDLUND, JUSTER, FORSBERG AND FEIKEMA ATTORNCYS AT LAW I L NDOUGLAS HALL September 3, 1965 9 11 PRODUCE SANK NUILOINO WYMAN SMITH MINNEAPOLI1lr11NN9207A 50*02 GEORGE HEDLUND LEONARD T. JUSTER 999 -1401 THOMAS G. fORSBERO �� OF /ICt• INI HENRY H. FEIKEMA OSttO RONALD L. HASKVIT2 nnnN ■Ad1O■ M Adopted and recommended to council for passage (after review by City Attorney) by the joint meeting of the Parks and Playgrounds Sub - Committee and Recreation Commission, August 30, 1965. ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF THE FRIDLEY-CITY CODE RELATING TOYTHE ORGANIZATION, POWER, AND AUTHOR -. The City�Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Section 1. That various sections of ,Chapter 24 of the Fridley' City Code be amended as follows: 119 Section 24.01 CREATION., There is hereby created a Parks and Recreation Commission for the City of Fridley. The commission shall consist of ; five Fridley residents, appointed by the City Council. The Commission Chairman shall be appointed by the City Council and shall also serve as a member of the Planning Commission. The initial members shall be appointed for staggered terms, so that the term of no more than one would conclude in any year. Thereafter, the members shall be appointed for terms\of three years. Both original and successive appointees shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified, A vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired portion of'the term by the City Council. Members of the commission shall serve without compensa tion and shall not be personally interested in any contracts of the commission. They shall at the beginning of each year select a vice- chairman and a secretary from their own number with duties in addition to commission membership implied by these titles. A majority shall con- stitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Section 24.02 SCOPE. The Parks and Recreation commission shall ad- vise the City Manager and Council on operation of a program of parks, playgrounds, and public recreation. If any part of the public recrea- tion program.of the community is administered directly by any public or private agency other than the City, the commission shall have power to make cooperative agreements with any such public or private agency for the purpose of coordinating all the activities and facilities in- cluded in such public recreation program. The commission may make use of public property assigned to, or of private property leased or other- wise made available for public recreational use. Upon recommendation of the commission, the Council shall determine what land is to be ac- quired for recreational purposes, what land the comaission -shall be permitted to:use in carrying on its recreational program., and what build- ings or other permanent structures are to be constructed upon such lend. The commission shall advise the Council upon such matters and shall organize and review the operation of facilities made available to it N 120 for recreational purposes, but it shall have no authority to acquire land in its own name or without the consent of the governmental unit in whose name such land is to be acquired.. Section 24.03 POWER. In order to carry on responsibilities provided herein, the commission shall have power to: (a) Adopt rules for its meetings and the transaction of its business and rules governing the use by the public of the recreation facilities under its control. (b) Consent and approve appointment by the Parks and Recrea- tion Director of personnel necessary to carry uout the responsibilities . of the commission. (c) Accept gifts of real and personal property for public` recreational purposes, subject to the provisions of Section 24.02. (d) Provide for maintenance and care of public property which has been assigned to it for public recreational purposes. (e) Perform whatever other\ acts are reasonable and necessary' and proper to carry out the commission's responsibilities under this ordinance. Section 24.04 PROGRAM. The commission shall each yeat prior to September 1, prepare a comprehensive program for parks improvement and acquisition and for public recreation activities for the ensuing year. The commission's program shall be described in terms of activities as well as finances. The budget of finances shall show: (a) Estimated revenues, divided as follows: (1) Amount appropriated by City Council (2) Contributions frogi private sources, (3) Earnings from admissions and _otheZ charges made for use of facilities (4) Miscellaneous revenues; and ,(b) - Estimated expenditures, divided as follows: (1) Administration payroll (2) Instructional and supervisory payroll (3) Maintenance and improvement payroll (4) Supplies (5) Printing ' (6) Postage, express freight, utility charges (7) Repairs 00 P 1�1 (L2) Contractual services (13) Taxes and assessments (14) Consultant fees. Such budget shall,, be submitted not later than June 1, to the City Manager.. _ The final decisions as to these contributions shall be reported back to the commission,,which shall adjust the budget, if nessary. The ex penditure allowances, as finally approved by the commission and City Council, shall control the year's spending program. The commission shall not itself levy taxes or borrow money; and it shall not approve any claims or incur any obligations for expenditure. Section,24.05. FUNDS. For the purpose of financing the parks and recrea 'tion program authorized by this chapter, the accounting shall be the responsibility of the treasurer of the City. The commission shall be authorized to establish charges or fees for the restricted use of any facilities or to make any phase of the recreationr.program wholly or partially self- sustaining. Any employees who handle cash in the process of collection shall be bonded. ,Section 24.06 REPORTS. In matters relating to the recreation program, personnel and finances, advisory reports shall be made directly to the City Council through the City Manager. Matters relating to property purchases•, capital improvements and facilities shall be reported to the City Council with recommendation of the Planning Commission. .Section 24.07 ANNUAL REPORT. The commission shall, as soon as possible . after the end of each calendar year, present to the City Council, a comprehensive annual report of its activities. Passed by the City Council of the City of Fridley thisr_, day of ,. 1965. ' .. William.J. Nee, Mayor ATTEST: Marvin C. Brunsell, City Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Published: r -,- _._ g'5 .. µ... N ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO REGULATE THE DISTRIBUTION ,OF COMMERCIAL AND NON COMMERCIAL HANDBILLS, AND TO LICENSE PERSONS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF DISTRIBUTING OF HANDBILLS FOR HIRE; TO DEFINE TERMS; AND TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION.OF SUCH ORDINANCE AND TO BE DESIGNATED AS CHAPTER 20 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 20.01 PURPOSE I That to protect the people against the nuisance of and incident to the promiscuous.distribution of handbills and circulars, particularly commercial handbills, as herein defined, with the resulting detriment and danger to public health and safety, the public interest, convenience "4 and necessity, requires the regulation thereof and to that end the purposes of this,Ordinance are specifically declared to be as follows: (a) To protect the people against the unlawful activities or operations of desolate persons of criminal habits or tendencies, representing themselves as handbill distributors, by requiring the registration of all such distributors, together with the names of their-. • employeyrs, and by regulating the business of handbill and advertising distribution through the imposition of reasonable license fees. I(b). To protect local residents against trespassing by handbill`' f distributors upon the private property of such residents if they have . given reasonable notice that they do not wish to be solicited by such persons,or do not desire to receive 'handbills or advertising matter. (c) To protect the people against the health and safety menace and the expense incident to the littering of the streets and public places by the promiscuous and uncontrolled distribution of advertising matter and commercial handbills. i (d) To preserve to the people their Constitutional right to recede and disseminate information not restricted under the ordinary, Y,. rules of decency and good moral and public order, by distinguishing''.. between the nuisance created by the promiscuous distribution of ;. advertising and commercial circulars and the right to deliver non- commercial handbills to all who are willing to receive the same. I i r 123 20.02 DEFINITION The following words, terms and phrases when used in this Ordinance have the meaning described to them in this Section except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: (d) "Commercial Handbill" shall mean and include any printed or written matter, any sample or device, dodger, circular, leaflet, pamphlet, paper-, booklet, or any other printed or otherwise reproduced' original or copies of any matter or literature: 1. Which advertises for sale any merchandise, product, commodity, or thing;,or 2. Which ' directs attention to any business or mercantile or commercial establishment or other activity, for the purpose of either directly or indirectly promoting the interest thereof by sales; or 3. Which, while containing leading matter other than advertising matter, is predgminently and essentially an advertisement, and is distributed or circulated for advertising purposes, or for the private benefit end gain of any persons so engaged as $dvertiser or distributor: (b) "Handbill Distributor" shall mean and include any person engagidg or engaged in the business for hire or gain of distributing commercial or non commercial handbills, other than newspapers distributed to subscribers thereof, and any person receiving compensation directly or indirectly for the distribution of such handbill. (c) "Newspaper" shall mean and include any newspaper of general circulation as defined by law; and in addition thereto shall mean and include any periodical or current mggazine regularly published with not less than 4 issues per year, and sold to the public. (d) "Noncommercial Handbills" shall mean and include any printed or written matter, any sample or device, dodger, circular, leaflet, pamphlet, newspaper, magazine, paper booklet, or any other printed or otherwise reproduced original or copies of any matter or literature not include in the aforesaid definition of a commercial handbill or newspaper. (e) "Private Premises" shall mean and include any dwelling,. house,',building, or other structure, designed or used either wholly or in part for private residential purposes, whether inhabited or temporarily or continuously uninhabited or vacant, and shall include any yard, grounds, walk, driveway, porch, steps, vestibule or mailbox belonging or pertinent to such dwelling, house, building, or other structure. (f)* "Public Place" shall mean and include any and all.streetss', I boulevards, avenues, lanes, alleys, or other public ways, and any and all public parks, squares, spaces, plazas, grounds and buildings. 20.03 THROWING HANDBILLS t It shall °ire unlawful for any person to deposit, place, throw, scatter or cast 'Any commercial handbill in or upon any public place within their City; and it shall be also unlawful for any person to hand out or distribute, or sell any commercial handbill in any public place; provided; however, that it shall not be unlawful for any person to hand',.out or distribute, without charge to the receiver thereof, any, noncommercial handbill in any public place to any person willing to accept such noncommercial handbill. 20.04 PLACING IN VEHICLE It shall be unlawful for any person to distribute, deposit, place, throw, scatter, or cast any commercial or noncommercial handbill - in or upon any automobile or other vehicle. The provisions of this Section shall not be deemed to prohibit the handing, transmitting, or distributing of any noncommercial handbill to the owner or other occupant of any automobile or other vehicle, who is willing to accept . the same. 20.05 DISTRIBUTION VACANT COMMERCIAL It shall be unlawful for any person to distribute, deposit, place,,throw, scatter or cast any commercial or noncommercial handbill in or upon any private..premises which are temporarily or continuously uninhabited or vacant. 20.06 POSTED PROPERTY It shall be unlawful for any person to distribute, deposit, place, ''throw, scatter or cast any commercial or noncommercial handbill upon any premises if requested by anyone thereon not'to do so, or if there is placed upon said premises in a conspicuous position near the W.: entrance thereof, a sign bearing the words: "No Trespassing;', "No Peddlers or Agents ", "No Advertisements ", or any similar notice, indicating in any manner that the occupants of said premises do not - desire to be molested or to have-their right of privacy disturbed, or to have any such handbills left upon such premises. 20.07 INHABITED PRIVATE PREMISES No persons licensed under the provisions of this Ordinance, or any other person, shall distribute, deposit, place, throw, scatter or cast any commercial or noncommercial handbill in or upon any private premises which are inhabited, except' by handing or .transmitting any such handbill directly to the owner, occupant, or any other person then present in or upon such private premises;_ provided, however, that in case of inhabited private premises which are not posted as provided in this chapter, the aforesaid licensed or other person, unless requested by any one upon such premises not _31 I I 125 to do so, may place or deposit any such handbill in or upon such f inhabited private premises, if such handbill is so placed or deposited as to secure or prevent such handbill from being flown or drifted about such premises or elsewhere, except that mailboxes may not be so used when so pvohibited by Federal.Postal Laws or regulations. 20.08 IDENTIFICATION It shall be unlawful for any person to distribute, deposit, scatter, hand out or circulate any commercial or noncommercial handbill in any place under any circumstances which does not have printed on the cover, front or back thereof, the name and address of the following: (a) The person who printed, wrote, compiled or manufactured :the same. (b) The person who caused the same to be distributed. 20.09 DISTRIBUTORS - LICENSE FEE ('a) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of handbill distributor for hire or for any person to distribute commercial or noncommercial handbills without first complying with the { terms of this chapter and all other relevant laws and regulations; provided, that nothing contained herein shall apply to any person advertising his business or activity upon his own premises. (b) Any person desiring to engage,as principal, in the business of distributing commercial or noncommercial handbills for hire, shall make application to and receive from the City Manager or other persons empowered to issue the same, a license in the manner and for the period prescribed by the terms of this chapter. Such applicant shall make written application to the City upon a form or forms provided for such purpose. Such form shall contain,among• other things, :the name, the business address, and a brief description of the nature of the business to be conducted by the applicant, the probable number of agents and employees so to be engaged, together with a request for a license for the period for which the applicant seeks to engage in such business. (c) Without .excluding other just grounds for revocation, the City Council, or officials so empowered by law, may revoke any license 4 obtained under an application containing a false or fraudulent statement knowingly made by the applicant with intent to obtain a license by means of false or fraudulent, representation, or for violation of this Chapter', or any other grounds specified by law. Such application I shall be accompanied by the fee hereinafter provided for in this Chapter. No license issued under this Chapter shall be transferrable; and if any such Zicense shall be surrendered by the licensee therein named, or shall be revoked for cause, neither the licensee named in such license, nor any other person, shall be entitled to any refund of any part of such fee. ..4- N w r 126 1 (d) License fees under the terms of this Chapter and for any such purpose, shall be as follows: For a period of one year, the sum of $50.00 For a pel.iod of three months, the sum of $25.00 For.a period of one week, the sum of $15.00 For a period of one day, the sum of $10.00 provided, that persons acting for licensees as agents or employees, in the distributing of any such handbills shall not be required to obtain'a license or. pay a fee, but each such person shall comply with each and all of the other provisions thereof and be subject thereto. 20.10 EXERTIONS The provisions of this Chapter shall not be deemed to apply to the distribution of mail by the United States, nor to newspapers general circulation. 20,011 OFFENSIVE HANDBILLS,, It shall be unlawful for any person to hand out, distribute or transmit a handbill which is offensive to public morals or decency,' or which contains blasphemous, obscent, libelous or scurrilous language, 20.'x12 PENALTIES Any person who violates any portion of this Chapter is subject to the penalties.set forth in Chapter 105 of the Fridley City Code, PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1965. i William J. Nee Mayor ATTEST: i Marvin Brunsell City Clerk First Reading Second 4eading Publication i h ORDINANCE DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING CITY OF FRIMSY 6431 University Avenue Fridley, Minn. �. September 20, 1965 Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minn. 55421 Re: Report on the Bids for cleaning up dump South of 73rd Avenue and East of Univer- sity Avenue Gentlemen.- The Bids for the above mentioned work were opened at noon on Friday, 17th day of.S-eptember,.\1965. Following.is the list of bids submitted by different contrac- tors: Bidder Base Bid Reduction for City pro- Completion Time viding disposal area for each 100 Cu. Yds. Jerry Excavating $20,950.00 $15.00 per 100 Cu. Yds. From Oct. l to 6864 Fairchild Ave.N.E. Dec. 1,1965 Fridley Trucking Co. $19,640.00 ---- - - - - -- 30 Days 6800 Channel Rd.N.E. Julian M. Johnson & Ted Renollett Contr-. $18;875.00 No reduction Sept. 20 to 3638 Belden Drive. Oct. 15, 1965 As 'the City is ,anxious to clean the dump as soon as possible, I recommend, that the contract be awarded to Julian M. Johnson and Ted Renollett Contractors. 'Al &I NA IM QURRSHI, P.S. City Engineer NQ:ob DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING • CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 University Avenue. Fridley, Minn. /a •z� September 20 1965 Truck 7 Cu. Yd. $ 7.50 /hr. Edwards Street Wayne 3/4 Cu. Yd. Yes $15.00 /hr. $60.00 curb mile Sweeping Service 1460. ' 1300 Powderhorn Ter. Minneapolis, Minn. Loading & Trucking $ 2.00 /cu. yds•.• IIndustry Services, Mobil Twin 4 Cu. Yd. Yes $18.75/hr. $57.50 /curb mile I89 Dean Ave. Engine Includes dis- St. Paul, Minn. 55118 posal of debris Clean Sweep Co. Vacuum Type l 3/4 Cu. Yd. No $16.75/hr. 'Don't want to' 4213 16th Ave. So. Tennant Without dis- bid on this Minneapolis, Minn. 'Sweeper posal of basis.. debris Les Chesney, superintendent of public works, advises that the work be awarded to Industry Services Inc., 1359 Dean Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55118 on curb mile basis at the rate of /curb mile. He feels that Industry Services, Inc. hes submitted thelbest r to for the equipment furnished. 1-concur with %his recommendations. NASIK QURESHI, P.E. - City Engineer t Honorable Mayor-and-City Council c/o Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley,,,-. 6431 University•Ayenue N.E. Fridley, Minn. 55421 :. Res Proposals for Sweeping•of Tornado Area Streets Gentlemen: Following are the proposals submitted by different contractors for sweeping of Tornado Area Streets. Contractor Equipment Uses Rate our Rate /curb mile Machines Capacity Water Pat McEnroe, Inc. Vacuum Type 1.3/4 Cu.\Yds. No $15.50 /hr. Don't want to 3511 Siems Court Tennant plus 1 hr. bid on this' - St. Paul, Minn. Sweeper travel time basis Loader 3 Cu. Yd. $18.00 /hr.,' Truck 7 Cu. Yd. $ 7.50 /hr. Edwards Street Wayne 3/4 Cu. Yd. Yes $15.00 /hr. $60.00 curb mile Sweeping Service 1460. ' 1300 Powderhorn Ter. Minneapolis, Minn. Loading & Trucking $ 2.00 /cu. yds•.• IIndustry Services, Mobil Twin 4 Cu. Yd. Yes $18.75/hr. $57.50 /curb mile I89 Dean Ave. Engine Includes dis- St. Paul, Minn. 55118 posal of debris Clean Sweep Co. Vacuum Type l 3/4 Cu. Yd. No $16.75/hr. 'Don't want to' 4213 16th Ave. So. Tennant Without dis- bid on this Minneapolis, Minn. 'Sweeper posal of basis.. debris Les Chesney, superintendent of public works, advises that the work be awarded to Industry Services Inc., 1359 Dean Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55118 on curb mile basis at the rate of /curb mile. He feels that Industry Services, Inc. hes submitted thelbest r to for the equipment furnished. 1-concur with %his recommendations. NASIK QURESHI, P.E. - City Engineer t I I re- CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS REGARDING STORM SEWER SYSTEM, TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 47 45TH AVENUE OUTFALL THIS AGREEMENT, mane and entered into by and between the City of Fridley, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as "Fridley" and the City of Columbia Heights, acting by and through its City Council, hereinafter',referred to as "Columbia Heights." WITNESSETH Whereas the State of Minnesota, Fridley and Columbia Heights have proposed the construction of a storm.sewer system which will provide drainage facilities for the use of the State of Minnesota, the City of Fridley and the City of Columbia Heights; snd, WHEREAS, thik proposed . storm sewer system will be +divided in two parts for purposes of construction, namely the work within T.H. #47 right- of-way and the work within Fridley and Columbia Heights west of T.H. #47; and,` WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota will construct tho portion.of the storm sewer system within the right- of -vays of T.H. #47 (Untirersity Avsnue,•N.E.); and, WHEREAS, Fridley will construct the portion of the storm sewer system lying west of T.H. #479 will obtain the necessary easements for their con struction project, and will supervise and control said construction. AREAS, certain cooperative agreements are being executed between Fridley and the State of Minnesota and Columbla'Heights and the State of Minnesota; and, 129 Page 2 WHEREAS, by letter of June 25, 1965 to Fridley, the State of Minnesota District Highway Engineer, 8. J. McCubrey, summarized the cost breakdown of mains and manholes for each project as follows: 38th Avenue 4o 51st Avenue. 66.5X Columbia Heights • 14.4X Fridley 19.1X State of Minnesota 52nd Avenue to 53rd Avenue. 78.52 Columbia Heights 21.5X State of Minnesota 45th Avenue Outfall and Laterals. 66.5X Columbia Height 14.4X Fridley 19.1X State of Minnesota plus 6X added-to the party's share that does not construct the sewer, which letter is hereby incorporated by reference in this Agreement; and, WHEREAS, where by-letter of August 17 1965 Mr. D. T. Dunschee, Municipal.,. Engineer.of the Department of Highways,,State of Minnesota .sent a letter to the City of Fridley and setting forth the division of costs of the various projects involving this Storm Sewer System,.which letter is also incorporated'by reference in this Agreement; and, WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights .has completed &.bond issue for payment of their share of the cost of this project, NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED among the parties as follows: 1. That all of the storm sewer West of Trunk Highway No. 47 will be let, con - structed and supervised by the City of Fridley. This includes the storm sewer in 44th Avenue 4est of 3rd St:, p.B. The Plans and Specifications 130 Page 3 of the construction of said storm sewer system and allied work will be -prepared by the Sthte of Minnesota Department of Highways jointly with Fridley and Columbia Heights, and said Plans and Specifications will be on file in the office of the City Engineer of Fridley, Minnesota and*are made a part hereof by reference with the same force and effect as though fully set', forth herein. -All change orders shall be approved in writing by all parties. 2. r Fridley shall acquire the easements necessary to the said construction i and award a contract or contracts to the lowest responsible bidder or bidders. Fridley will supervise said construction and cause own to be built in accordance with the plans and specifications for said project. Fridley agrees that the supervision and direction of the project by it shall be under the supervision of a registered professional engineer and the construction of said storm sewer project and allied work be open to inspec- tion by the District Engineer of the Minnesota Department of Highways or his duly authorized representative and the City Engineer of the City of Columbia Heights.or his duly authorized representative., Payment for said construction will be made by and through the administrative offices of the City of Fridley. That included in the total cost of the project will be the land cost and cost of acquiring easements, including the administrative and legal 'fees involved .therein, relocation of utilities and restoration of street surfacing. 3. NThat attached hereto and made 'a part hereof by reference with the same force I 131 Page 4 and effect as though fully set forth herein are Schedules "A" describing that portion of the construction shared by Columbia Heights, Fridley and the -State 'of Minnesota, Schedule "B" describing that portion of the con- struction which cost will be borne 100% by Fridley and Schedule "C" de- scribing that portion of the construction which cost will be borne 100% by Columbia Heights. 4. That on the portion of the work as described in Schedule "A" Columbia Heights will pay 66,5 %, Fridley 14.4% and the State of Minnesota 19.1%; in addition to payment of said percentages of the cost of construction work Columbia Heights and the State of Minnesota also agree to pay to Fridley a sum equal to 6% of the amount computed as their share of the construction _ costs for their share of engineering supervision. The cost of.that portion,` of the total cost of the project not covered above in this paragraph will be shared by Columbia Heights and Fridley, the cost so shared will be 82.2% by Columbia Heights and 17.8% by Fridley. 5. The Schedule "B" portion of the work will be performed by Fridley under -' the same terms and conditions as the balance of the work herein and with the same.provisions for payment of the work. Fridley will pay k of. all costs for work performed under Schedule "B ". 6. The Schedule "C" portion of the work will be performed by Fridley their 0 Page 5 the same terms and rconditions as the balance of the work herein and with the same provisions for payment of the work. Columbia Heights will pay 100% of all costs for work performed under Schedule "C ". 7. ' Fridley shall award the contract or contracts to the lowest responsible bidder, and upop.receipt of bids for the construction contemplated herein, promptly submit to the City Engineer of Columbia Heights a copy of the low bid received and an abstract of all bids received, together with Fridley's request for concurrence by the parties in the proposed award of the con- struction' contract. Fridley shall not make such construction contract award until the State and Columbia Heights advises Fridley in writing of its concurrence therein. Each party to the Agreement reserves the right to withdraw from and cancel this Agreement within fifteen (15) days from the opening of bids contemplated herein. In the event either or all parties consider any and all bids unsatisfactory, withdrawal from or cancellation of the Agreement to be accomplished by either party within fiften (15) days from the opening of bids by serviftg a written notice thereof by mail upon Fridley and.the other parties. In.the event of'withdrawal by either party other than Fridley, said party agrees to pay for its proportionage share of the administrative expense in letting the.project out for bids. The City of'Fridley shall keep such records and accounts as shall enable the City.u' completion of the work to submit to the State and Columbia 132 133 Page 6 Heights 'la detailed statement showing the amount due to Fridley for work perfo d hereund6r4 This statement shall list the items and quantities of work performed that are to be paid for by the sharing parties as pro- vided h rein, the,,-actual cost thereof computed at contract unit prices and the party's share of the cost thereof. It shall be submitted in quin- tuplicate and shall contain therein a certification by a responsible Fridley fficial to the effect that all the items therein are true and correct d have been expended upon the work performed under the provisions of this reement. It is understood that Fridley shall produce its records t and acco is in connection with this Agreement for examination if so re- quested y a duly authorized representative of the State or Columbia Heights. Each man h Columbia Heights will process the statement submitted to it by Fridley d obtain Council approval for payment so that within thirty (30) days aft r submission to Columbia Heights of a detailed statement from Fridley howing it's share of the work performed, 9070 of said amount will be avail ble:to Fridley for payment to the contractor as the work progresses and the etained percentage to be paid when all work is performed and accepted by the S ate, Fridley and Columbia Heights. General the part 9. iaintenance and repair of the lines in Fridley shall be shared by Les in accordance with a supplemental agreement. L Page 7 134 10. It is agr ad that Columbia Heights shall have the continued right to outlet it storm water drainage facilities into the storm sewer system construct d by Fridley hereinunder. ' t is also agreed that neither party to this A reement shall drain any additional area into the storm sewer as construct d by .Fridley that are not included in the area for which said storm sew r facilities were designed without first obtaining the permis- sion to d so from the other parties; that the facilities described in Schedule 'B" will carry Fridley drainage only and those described in Schedule 'C" Columbia Heights drainage only. 11. Fridley i demnifies, saves and holds harmless Columbia Heights.and all its agents and employees from ariy and all claims, demands, actions and causes of action of hatsoever nature or character arising out of or by reason of the axe- cution of erformance'of the work provided for hereunder, and further agrees to.defend t its own sole cost and expense any action or suit commenced for the pu ose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising as a i 4 I*• Page 8 result of the work to be performed hereunder. It is further agreed that any and a 1 employees of Fridley and all other persons employed by Fridley in the pe formance of any work or services required or provided for herein shall not be considered employees of the State or Columbia Heights and all R claims th t may ork'�night arise under the Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of nnesota on behalf of said employee while so engaged and.all claims made by y third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said F idley employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided o.be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or re- sponsibiltty of the State of Minnesota or Columbia Heights. 12. Before th s Agreement shall-be binding and effective it shall be approved by Resolution of the Council of the City of Fridley and the City Council of the City of Columbia Heights. ' IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement'by their dulp authorized officers and caused their respective seals to be hereunto fixed, this ,"„"day of , 1965. CITY OF FRIDLEY (City Seal) By Mayor By City Manager CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS (City By Seal) Mayor By City Manager . r; 135 �r N N N I 136 .a i -STATE OF MINNESOTA i. DNVARTMBNT OF HIGHWAY/ • . YT. PAUL, MINN. 56101 j. June 25, 1965 ; Mr. Earl W finer City .'�ianag r 6431 Univirsity Avenue N.B. Fridley, esota 5%a Re: S.P. 0205 -12 (T.H. 47) 38th Avenue to 53rd Avenue Proposed Cooperative Storm Sewer, Mr. W per: in Fridley and Columbia Heights '`"'• t our meeting on June 24, 1965 with representatives from : Columbia H ights and Fridley, the following points were agreed to: �s The State will construct `the portion of the storm sewer `! within highway right of way. This project is scheduled +j r to be let out for bids on October 15, 1965• 2.j Fridley will oon•atruct the 45th Avenue outfall and all laterals outside the highway right of way sometime this year. Fridley will obtain all necessary easements for -their construction project. The State will furnish !j Fridley the completed plan for this portion of the j project. The State will prepare cooperative`agreementss between Fridley and the State; Columbia Heights and the State for the highway portion of the project, and between ''• Fridley and the State for the State's share in Fridley's ' project. r<. 4 The State will send the breakdown of the cost estimate and cost split for each project to the municipalities for`` .. their approval. �+ 5 Council resolutions should be submitted to the State •• approving the plans and cost'split computed by the State. •l i !} lips �� •1 IPY _. • • ar. Earl ®r Z • . 1 .. ,Tune 25, 1965 �6. The State will construct the storm sewer on T.N. 47 frown 2nd Avenue to 53rd Avenue. This is a portion 'Sullivan of the IAe outfall and also serves , part of the T. H. 47 right of way. . each proje he following table is a summary of the tr cost breaWown, for Niahwav Department Project ` 38-''_o stt Ave.�*" Col. Htso State .jotal ''`'�` A,919 Mains & les $118,094. ' $25, 572 ' : $33 $177#585 5 Stubs for C 1. Hts. 3.2,553 12 553 Catch Basin & Leads `'� 7�9 i (25 -75% Bas $137,916 ► `.$26,150 .: $57,461. $2210527 2nd Ave. rd Ave. (78.5$) isms &Man oles $ 11,105 $ 3,041• $ 14,146 -ub from S a. 281+50 (81.10 (18.9%) to East R/W at 52nd Ave.' 3,437 801 4,238 Catch Basin & Leads � 6 ?. R9 (25 -75% Bas a $ 15,338 $ 59628 1,2o,76b Gr Total $153,454 $26,150 .$63,089 $242,293 • ti � V 140 Earl Wagner -2- August 17, 1965 Mr. separate method is Comsto*,informed the State that he wants to set up three Jules in the Contract Proposal and the State ooaoure that this t aptable to the State. ' Sc edule A .• Th sahecb& to - contain =4 the oonstruatiou items in 'Which the , F State partici tea in the Goat. :' • p '`• ,, at Soh Jule B F This achedule to contain the construction items in u&ich the City of Fridley wi. pays'the full cost of heads, Catch Basins and Stub Laterals., These faalit es will oarry only City of Fridley drainage. Sch diule C Thi schedule to contain the construction items in which the City s of Columbia H fights will pay the full cost of Leads, Catch Basins and Stub Laterals. Th se faoilities will carry only City of Columbia Heights drainage. The . State is preparing separate'•Cooperative Storm Sewer agreements s between the S to and the City of Fridley and the City of Columbia Heights for the Storm Sew construction upon and along University Ave: N.E. from 38th Ave.' N.E. and 53rd. Ave. N.E. -This Storm Sewer construction is to be performed'by the State in a grading and surfacing project to be let on approximately October 15th, 19650 The tate's oonstruotion project will consist of 2 independent Storm Sewer Systems. 1. etween 38th Ave. N.E. and 51st Ave. N.E.. This system will utilize the 45 h Ave. N.E. Outfall System to be construoted by the City of ` Fridley as the Outlet for the above Storm,Sswer System. Divi r ion of Cost - mains and Nanholes. : 19.1 State 14• City of Fridley �� T 66.5 'Columbia Heights Co Is. Heights Stubs 100% Columbia Heights i i Le and Catchs for.Frontage Roads drainage _ 1.~ 5% State -'25% Fridley. in Fridley Area. 2. % auto 23% Columbia Heights. In Columbia Heights Area. .. r i I0 K I 0 bids unti All Fai of OFFICIAL PUMA== CM OP FRIMXY NOTICE TO BIDDMS "CWEUCTn SEDAN -The City Council of the City of Fridley will accept an one "Compact" Sedan on the 4th day of October, 1965, L 12 :00 o'clock noon on said date at the City Ball, 6431 waity Avenue Northeast, Fridley 21, Minnesota ('Tel: 560 3450). F id s must meet the minimum requirements of the specifications. e to comply with this section a" result in disqualification bid. Bach bid &hall be accompanied by a certified check or b d bond is an amount of not less than 5% of tke bid Which check or shall be forfeited if the bidder neglects or refuses to enter into a contract, or to furnish a 1007'. performance bond after his bid has accepted. Ths City reserves the right to accept the bid which is determined to b in the best interest of the City. The City reserves the right to r jact any and all.bids, and waive all informalities or technicalities in bid. The City Council also reserves the right to consider such fac ra as time of delivery at performance, experience and responsibility of t re bidder, past performance of similar types of items or material, availability of replacement parts, and other similar factors that it may e4etaine in the best interest of the City. Copies of the specifications and general conditions may be examined in the Office of the City Manager, or copies may be obtained from his office. All bids must be submitted in sealed envelopes and plainly on the outside that the contents is a bid on one "Compact" : September 22, 1965 September 29, 1965 EARL P. WAGNBR City Manager 142 IN N �M F� 1 •W STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ' CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT S 2095 NO. LILAC DRIVS i MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. WMA22 August 26, 1965 City of Fridley City Ha I 6431 U Versity Avenue N.E. Minneap lie 21, Minnesota Attend 4: Mr. Earl Wagner, City Manager Re: S.P. 0205 -18, 2726 -27 Traffic Signals on T.H. 47 Gentlem A: at 49th Avenue N.E. Transmitted herewith is a copy of the preliminary plans for the si I at 49th Avenue N.E. The \contract for this signal will be let Oct b,er 15, 1965, in a package plan along with the grading and pav- ing, (8 ' North of St. Anthony Blvd. to 53rd Avenue N.E.), and the signals At 40th and 44th Avenue N.E. ih Columbia Heights. The City of Fridley will be asked to participate in the cost of the 9th Avenue N.E. signal in the sum of 25% of the construction cost pi 6% of such sum for engineering costs. (Total estimated con - structi nlcosts = $24,000). Since there is a municipality split at 49th, i is proposed that Fridley provide the electrical power supply and the electrical power, while Columbia Heights provide for relamping, cleanin ,,and painting. All other maintenance will lie with the State. ,The District Traffic Engineer, R. A. Kurpius, will contact you in egard to this tatter so the formal resolution and agreements may be osentedat the next Council meeting. Sincerely, , APB: eo DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS R. P. Braun Deputy District Engineer 143 I 0 U is Form 2123"2 the State of they hereby a on behalf of RESOLtVION NO. 168 -1965 3j IT RESOLVED that the Mttbxg* (City) enter into an agreement with "esota, Department of Hlghmys for the following purposes, to -rite o'- install a traffic control signal on Trunk Highway No. 117 University Avenue Northeast) at its intersection with 119th nue Northeast in accordance with the terms and conditions e't forth and contained in Agreement No. 511806, a copy of • ioh was before the Council. iC FUtTHER RESOLVED that tiie ( in e * (3kyor) and Clerk be and s si authorized to execute such agreements and thereby assume for and "a city all of.the contractual.obligations contained therein. SED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DLEY ON THE 20TH DAY OF SEPTENBER, 1965. ATTEST: William J. Nee, Mayor Marvin C. Brunsell, City Clerk CERTIFIC$TION State of Minnesota County of Anoka Fridley (City) I h reby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of resolution esemted to and adopted by the Counoil of the N (City) of at a duly authorized meeting t ,.areof held on the __.. y Of 19...._= as shown by file aiautes of sal meeting '� possess oas. . I • A • RESOLUTION DSO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING CHARGES TO THE�COUNrY AUDITOR TO BE LEVIED AGAINST tUn PROPERTIES FOR COLLECTION WITH THE TAXES PAYABLE IN 1966 144 , a nuisance condition has been found to exist on Lots 16 and 17, Block 9, lton's Addition to Mechaniesville, and the owner of such property was given notice to abate such nuisance, and , the owner of such property did not abate such nuisance and the City of Fridl : under authority of Section, 145.23 Miunesota State Statute of 1953 did therefore abate the nuisance at a total cost of $145.00. TNBRBFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorised and directed d certify to the County Auditor for collection with the taxes payable in 1966, be charges as listed below: Lo s 16 and 17. Block 9, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville Cleaned up yard and tore down old house $145.00 TOTAL ATTEST: SAD AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIYY OF FRIDLEY S DAY OF 1965. . MAYOR - William J. Nee 145 I ,tl i July 159 1965 0* M jmm . C =NNESOTA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT %TEK ALLOT. QTR. FUND AGREEMENT NO. 54803 AMOUNT ENCUMB. S.P. No. 0205 -18 (T.H. 47) R Agreement etween The City o Fridley, Minnesota ana th e of Minnesota Department r Highways Re: Storm S 'er Construction, 'Dunk High No.. 47 COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT �S AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota., dpartment of Highways, hereinafter referred to as the "State" and the Cit of Fridley, Minnesota, acting by and .through its City Council., . L � � N reimburse system bet provide dr of way, as storm: Bowe including outlets fo ment with i� f ' 54803 WHEREAS the City of Fridley has indicated its willingness to the State for part of the cost of constructing the storm sewer 38th,Avenue Northeast and 51st Avenue Northeast which will for areas that are not included in the trunk highway right hereinafter set forth; and URBAS it,is contemplated that the City will construct a City '• ,system on City streets westerly of said Trunk Highway No. 47;- outfall sewer to the Mississippi River, which will provide the storm sewers to be constructed by the State hereunder; and IEWS it is anticipated that the State will enter into an agree - }e City to provide for payment by the State to the City for the 4'7 State's p portionate share of the cost of constructing such City storm sewer system bas on the flow.contributed b� the trunk highway drainage areas; and OWS Minnesota Laws 1959, Chapter 500, Article II, Section 161920 authorized the Commissioner of Highways to make agreements with and cooperate with any g Orrm►ental authority for the purpose of constructing, maintaining and imp g the trunk highway system. N , THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: e State shall construct or cause to be constructed grading, base, bituminous rfacing, storm sewers, and other improvements upon and along Trunk High No. 47 between a point 800 feet north of St. Anthony Boulevard in Minneapo 's and 53rd Avenue Northeast in Fridley and Columbia Heights, in accordance th plans, therefor dated August 8, 1965 and designated as State Project No. 2726 -2'7 and No. 0205 -18, and the special provisions and specifi- cations for said State Projects No. 2726 -27 and 0205 -18. Said plans, special provisions specifications, on file in the office of Commissioner of Highways at St. Paul Minnesota and in the office of the City Engineer at Fridley, Minnesota, are made a art hereof by reference with.the same force and effect as though fully set f rth herein. -2 N N cost of c and along 215 feet Said cons contained 54503 II 148 ie City shall pay to the State the following percentages of the itructing storm sewer facilities to be done and performed upon wok Highway No. 47 between 38th Avenue Northeast and a point rth of 50th Avenue Northeast in accordance with Article I hereof. fiction costs shall be computed on the basis of unit prices - i a construction contract to be awarded by the State for-such work. i.4 percent of the cost of mainline storm sewers and mainline manholes. of the cost of ditch inlets, from the roadway ditches to the line storm sewers. aid mainline storm sewers and mainline manholes are indicated in red color., and the said ditch inlets between 47th Avenue Northeast and 49th Avenue No bast are indicated in orange color in the storm sewer portion designated the "South System" on the sketch attached hereto and marked Exhibit ,addition to payment of said percentages of construction work, the City shall so pay to the State a sum equal to 6 Percent of the amount computed as the City's share of said construction costs, it being understood that said tional payment by the City is the City's proportionate share of enginee hosts incurred by the State in connection with said storm sewer construct io . TII I is estimated that the aforesaid percentages of the cost of con- struction rk hereunder and said six percent engineering costs incurred by the State connection therewith will be approximately $23,529.10. The City-agrees to advance to the Commissioner of Highways said sum of $23,529.10 forthwith u execution of this Agreement and upon receipt of a request from the State f r! such payment. It is contemplated that all of the said work } r3r i l l N 54803 as provided for in said plans, specifications, and special provisions in the aforesaid construction of Trunk Highway No. 47 is to be done by the State by contract duly let on a unit price basis. Upon the completion and acceptance I of the wo#rlc provided for in said contract by the State and the prepartation by the St a of a final estimate computing and determining the amount due the contracto 'performing the work, the Commissioner of Highways shall'deterxine and compu the amount due the Trunk Highway Fund of the State of 11innesota, hereunder from the City. After the Commissioner of Highways shall have determined 'is aforesaid the actual amount due from the City, he shall apply on the p ant thereof as much'as may be necessary of said sum of $23,529.10 paid by toe City: If the amount found due from the City shall be less than said sum a�f,$23,529.10, then, and in that event, the balance of said sum shall be urned to the City without interest. If the amount so found due from the shall exceed the sum of $23,529.10, the City agrees to promptly pay the State the difference between the said amount found due and said sum of $23,5296100 It is further agreed that the aforesaid computation and determination by the Co ssioner-of Highways of the amount due from the City hereunder shall be final, bin ng and conclusive. It is hn-Lt er agreed that the acceptance by the State of tl 0 said completed work provided for in said plans, specifications and special p Ilrc dsions to be performed under contract as aforesaid shall be final, binding an ,conclusive upon the City as to the satisfactory completion of said work* IV ;f'r by duly adopted resolution of the City., a change or changes in I the plan Of storm sewer work is requested to satisfactorily complete the project, • J �I l N 54803 as provided for in said plans, specifications, and special provisions in the aforesaid construction of Trunk Highway No. 47 is to be done by the State by contract duly let on a unit price basis. Upon the completion and acceptance I of the wo#rlc provided for in said contract by the State and the prepartation by the St a of a final estimate computing and determining the amount due the contracto 'performing the work, the Commissioner of Highways shall'deterxine and compu the amount due the Trunk Highway Fund of the State of 11innesota, hereunder from the City. After the Commissioner of Highways shall have determined 'is aforesaid the actual amount due from the City, he shall apply on the p ant thereof as much'as may be necessary of said sum of $23,529.10 paid by toe City: If the amount found due from the City shall be less than said sum a�f,$23,529.10, then, and in that event, the balance of said sum shall be urned to the City without interest. If the amount so found due from the shall exceed the sum of $23,529.10, the City agrees to promptly pay the State the difference between the said amount found due and said sum of $23,5296100 It is further agreed that the aforesaid computation and determination by the Co ssioner-of Highways of the amount due from the City hereunder shall be final, bin ng and conclusive. It is hn-Lt er agreed that the acceptance by the State of tl 0 said completed work provided for in said plans, specifications and special p Ilrc dsions to be performed under contract as aforesaid shall be final, binding an ,conclusive upon the City as to the satisfactory completion of said work* IV ;f'r by duly adopted resolution of the City., a change or changes in I the plan Of storm sewer work is requested to satisfactorily complete the project, N -• - 54503 I referred to in Article II, the City and the State shall enter into a the costs easements required o to be perl of way or ,el agreement before any of the work is performed covering division of of such Aork between the City and the State. V The.City ,shall without cost or expense to the State obtain all and =wLtUction per=:ts a.•A draaz.-:aae cutlet rights that zas be - the corporate City limits in connection with the construction hereunder outside of the limits of the trunk highway right ty streets, and shall promptly furnish the State with certified copies thereof. Such easements, construction permits and drainage outlet rights sha4 run to the State. VI �he storm sewer facilities to be constructed by the State upon and along 'unk Highway No. 47 in accordance with Article I hereof will be within the corporate City limits of Fridley and Columbia Heights and will provide drainage for City areas adjacent to the trunk highway right of way as well as for:the said trunk highway. The City of Fridley is about to award a contract fplr the.construction of a storm sewer system westerly of said Trunk Highway Noo,47 within the corporate limits of Fridley and Columbia Heights. This will i , �P i rovide additional dranage•for'both cities and an outlet for the storm sew facilities to be constructed by the State referred to above. consideration of payment by the State of part of the cost of constructing the storm sewer facilities upon and along Trunk Highway No. 47 contetmplat herein, the City of Fridley agrees to make the necessary arrange-.. X ments for of the proper maintenance /all of said storm sewer facilities without cost-or expense to the State. The City agrees to promptly furnish the State with a certified i copy of the agreement or contract it enters into with others relative t such surer maintenance. I; , , -•5 • _ . 548o3 151 I ,Xit is also understood that the City shall not drain any additional r areas into the storm sewer system constructed hereunder that are not included in the dr age are4Ls for which said storm sewer system was designed without first obtl permission to do so from the Minnesota Department of Highways. VII The City li demnifies, saves and holds harmless the State and all of its agenbs and employees of and from any and all claims, demands, actions or causes �f action of whatsoever nature or character arising out of or by reason of e maintenance work provided for herein to be performed by the City and further'';agrees to defend at its own sole cost and expense any action or ' proceeding) Commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character { sing as a result of the said maintenance work. VIII ' .. I $t is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other (persons while engaged in said maintenance work shall not be considered employees j�f the State, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the tOrkmenls Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said empla�►Oes. while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third i parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engagedl�on said maintenance work shall in no way be the obligation or responsi- • bility of the State, and the,City holds the State harmless from any and all such cl IX �sfore this agreement shall be come binding and effective, it shall be approved resolution of the City Council of the City and shall also PP UY receive th 4pproval of such State officers as the law may provide in addition to the #ai oner of Highways. 54803 I3 TESTIMONY WHEREW the parties have duly executed this Agreement • by their duly authorized officers and caused their respective seals to be hereunto affixed. , (City Se )i. CITY OF FRIDLEY II BY Mayor . it OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF' 22INNFSOTA I for approval: By oC/• OV - cp Engineer Assistant Commissioner of Highways By 1 Date Road' sign Fig eer Date of Agreement gy Approvedt Dis Pict Engineer Cam issioner of Administration Deput Chief Engineer Authorized S ture �a Approved a Ito form and executions Special' Assistant Attorney General f t • K u 0 RESOLUTION NO, 144 - 1965 S, sa ler Title I of the Rousing Act of 1949, as Naming and Rome Finance Administrator is authorized to assistance to a locality for the planning and undar- taking of 'an urban renewal project in an urn area waich the morning body of tl w locality certities, and the Adasiniatrator finds, is in I nee of r*1wmJopwnt or rehabilitation as a result of a catastrophe ich the Vosidont has dotervained to be a major diaaaster; and , it is desirable and in the yublic interest that the Fridley Homing and Redevelov �rmnt Atat aoxity Wepswe survwys and plazas 1wosently erstim tad to cost approxLmately Seventy-nine thousand aeven I hundred slAY-nine and no/100 (379,769.00) Dollars, in carder to underts>a and cagy out an urban rune l project of the ter contemplated by Section IX of said Title 1, in that certain area, proposed as an Urban Renoual Ate., situated. in the City of Fridley, County of .AYWA&, and State of Mizwoota, and described as followas OF FIRIDLW XIMMOTA r That the proposed Urban Renewal Are& described above is an urn In need of redayslopment or raaabilitation as a result of 153 U 0 & ca. which the President, pursuant to the provisions of Public Law $759 019t Congress, as amended, has determined to be a major die" tM3�.'and is appropriate for an urban renewal project; that the undertaking by the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority of surveys and plans for an urban renewal project of the character cones templatedil by Section III of Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as emended, in the �roposed Urban Renewal Area described above, is hereby approved; and that , fizancial assistance under Title I is needed to enable the Fridlassry Mousing and Redevelopment .authority to finance the undertaking of the tro3ect. 2. That it is cognizant of the conditions that are imposed in the ing and carrying out with Federal financial assistance I of an u bpn renewal project of the character contemplated. by Suction III of Tit14 I. including those prohibiting discrimination beemme of race, I color, or national origin; and also the following requirements: (a) thy► ,!the contract for temporary loan or capital writ for the Pro- ject shall specify a date for compliance with the workable program for I community i.sprovement requirements of Section lul(c) of Title I; (b) that the ',urban renewal plain shall be approved by this body; (c) that i Local gets -in -sad, cozasinting of donations of cash, land, demolition or remo I�►stjl work, and the installation, construction, or reconstruction of estro", utilities, parks, playgrounds, or other improvements or the proviasiaM of otPs" public buildings or facilities, necessary for carry- ing out I in the Urban Renewal !area; the objectives of the urban renewal. plan, +capital still be provided in an amount which, together: with the Federal 00". will be generally egval to the difference between 154 n u 0 cross P. loaned, and (d) courage dwellin, by the in corm such cc and Red project ATTEST. oct Cost and the procaadas or value of project land gold, retained for tee ij accordezee wi. +.h the urban renewal plan; at tae" Shall be M paraed an carried out a plan for the en- A., to the ma uimucm eqrtent feasible., of the provision of suitable for the needs of ind3viduala and familiars displaced or disaster or by r6devaelopwnt or rehabilitation activities lion with the Project; and it is the sense of this body that ,tions can and will be emplied with. 3. That the filing' of an application by the Freidley Housing klopo nt Autboriter for svrreya and plans for an urban renewal I the Urban. Renewal a doxcribed above is hereby approved. PAssim AND A13 Fm THx eery COUNCIL cw Tm c= a' muLF.Y. this 16th -dray of A�gnst, 1965- William J . N", MaayVr 155 AI AT CF to of E LVJMCN SIG T 015602 - 6TH STS BRING A 8AZA3�DO�TS AS,. on August Lunt and Building in J1011owings 1. 1wroper 2. Front and 30 Overgrowth -. o No ✓ ��� REPAM OR SAL CV Ti 8TR=MS LOCMD NCRTINWT M TM CM CF RRM" BY BEASO E, 1965 James Hensel, City of Fridley Health actor, inspected the property and reported and burning of garbage. premises littered with trash and refuse.. weeds on the property. 8, an 8sptemb�as 22, 1964, and May 1, 1965 said Health James Hensisy, f the City of Fridley investigated similar is concerning th property said complaints of rata in the and fomtd the caaap is concerning improper storage of garbage, 0 agatee the owner f thee® premises has been repeatedly lied to clean and c1 same and provide adequate facilities for �toeage of garbage refuse, and investigation reveals that *am has failed to ide for p�eoper storage of garbage and pond the compliance f the tenants to use same. 'UNWM, an August on August 23, 1965 Leonard Biclmiller, City 114" Electrical Inspector, inspected the premises and reported electrical outlets in the kitchen of each of these dwelling o ave poorly locateoLnecessitating the escessive use of drop is tbeteby causing a ;=ard. ti1ISREASa the pro► remedy of this condition of improperly ked electrical outi is in the kitchen of each of these dwelling Is the P ins Nation of additional electrical outlets �g a mioieaasa of 20 a capacity. BAB* on An and Heating Inspectm Wrenn and 31, 1965 Willism Sandin, City of Fridley Vector, inspected the property and repoaets�l i wbich in the opinion of the PI ins and r the required 1-hour lire rating of the require the following or equal repaisss 156 r-I L�A 0 0 U The a OWN beads 2. The d not a 3. Tate l are p damps 4. Sam the f 318 1 of 7% folic M '!. The i vark beech Into 2. The* a n mbe 3. The C outai and v beat 4. "WA and b West stack of the within 6 incites of lied door bead bein cibls materials on the furnace G.Core door*. vecers to the fa equipped with rock on the AS s^ovsos men thickness. AS, on August Building ins ea#sting coed "fiation •are or, places. So a Vatsed allaafag pa WMI space. Wear berm bas an of supports. *PI space Is open to Is allowing orates, pro WiIals to enter at era to Vie• km tile are loose, r4sa. Water has out 3 I the - floor mideslaym A& no aoverieg or fl " vaderiaq (anb -£lo =xe. (single f NECSBSM RIPAIRS xaace 1. Cover door head with cauent- be door abestes or equal non- earbmtible made of materialo ma are 20 Install 1 -31411 solid core doom* with proper louvers. 3. Equip the louvers with fire dampers. Of 4. Install sufficient sheet Lock on both sides of wall to make" thickness, or sufficient sheet rock on the interior to provide • 1 -hoar fire rating to the faswace rooms. 1965 Allen Jensen and Clarence Belisle, City are inspected the premises and reported the m raptring the following or equal repaiarss BBCSSSASY RIIPAIBS In 1. Point up the cracks as "OOSSAVY• have not . to seep equate 2. Pour 3 concrete pads equally. spaced under the beam and build supporting columns out of mseosurg on the concrete pads. the 3. ;natal! doors with locks on the ante crap, spacer Openings. ,l and Teed 4. Strip and exemaine sub - floor. and Replace sub-floor as nom. Install V" plywood over sub - floors and than install mm other the floor covering -or other covering as required. 5. Cal' area Cei' rev 6. Val: few stn of 7s The I$ joists lifted IU ds a result of the kS water damaged as of *to= damage. b " cracks and bol s. Possibly due 4amap makiug the a w of the Wall stoda ftig we damaged -b MM zovfing vas L. F proper preparatio Ming. Workmanship 153 PAGE 3 r a rghqM REAIRS. VM.I_ it 5. Reset and recall all loose sm. joists. Remove and replace damaged ceiiinga and ceiling Insulation. In a 6. Remove sheetrock wherever evidenaa of damage =dates Ition renati loose studs and recover obtful. with new sheet rock. P-71 Of the elected'. 8. lire a on the south vest wslb is cracked, brokend A lack of proper maim is evident. 9. The *11ding suffere from s, lack of PXop er maintenance. Th Window putty 31s dried, unpainted, cracked and � loose. Facia, ce and trim need painting to revent 10. The has allowed the to opt .the vends a1=01 the twIn lieu of pr+ Off-street parking. 11. The 1009 MM weeds. 1 M* ;C .H$ XT Pridley' as follwes 16 a notice pursuant con hazardous build City = that said no to bps e 7. Remove all roofing material. . Examine roof sheathing and repair and renail roof sheathing and roof components as required. Install now roofing over proper roof sheathing. 8. Remove siding on south and vest Walls and replace With new siding. Repair any damaged shakes on other walls. Paint as necessary. 9. Scrape and reputty all vfndcws as needed. Scrape, sand and repaint entire structure as needed. 10. Provide proper off - street parking for each dwelling unit. (the ordinance requires paved off street parking for 2 cars per dwelling unit in the rear with paved drivevap for now construction.) U. Sod the Tawas properly. by the City Council of the City of Minnesota Statutes 462.39 to 462.40 be prepared by the City Attorney and give the owners until December 70, 1965 tion at make the necessery repairs to 0 0 0 NO. Out the defects an r .aaotrical InspecI Pltebing and Neat; Abe ewers as provii r Attorney is antlm sty to enforce said teative action is as .,Y f PAGE 4 rated by the City a alth Inspector, the the City Building Inspector, and the ;Inspector; that said notice be served by said Mirmesota Statutes and the ad to proceed in District,Court Anoka tics and order if the necessary taken by the owner. AND ADOPTED BY GiTY CO[A�TCIL O[+ T1� CITY O[+' htBIDEEY DAY CP 1965. C. ERMMMO CIO cum WVMAM J. IGM 9 MAYO! 159 0 • A in AT 56 OF IT the to IT��Z( �t G TOE Q/ MW - 6Tg I I Iiili MW A HAZAMMS W. moo on SW 1. 1 and Building map owim conditional «i. aopvr 20 1011paloper BAs, an August flow and Bail the following 1. Improper, atoTA t. Improper berat 3. Front and rear 4. Owe% roath of Noun, the City of No and clear the pr awe of garbage NO. IJb s' OR TONAL CV Ted STRWTUSB LOWED ST IN TM CITY OF FBIMRY BY BSASON James H. 8eatley-, City of Fridley Health r. inspected that property and reported of garbage. of garbage. 1965 James H. Hensley, City of'Fridley Inspector, inspected the property w-id of garbage. of garbage forbidden by ordinance:. littered with trash and refuse. .ley Health Officer has ordered the Owner a, and to provide facilities for the the awner has failed to comply with said tagmngs on August , 1965 Leonard BiebmUler, City of Fridley Hie T"Pectar, ted the premises and reported that the oleo outlets in the tahen of each of the dwelling :nits ate poor Lgeaated necensita the use of as excessive, n�omber of drag 0 41 bons and hies causing a hasaard. MAS, the said 81 trical Impactor reported that no outside 0xists over the entry to provide security for the tewmte Mblt users to avoid at the rear of tbn dwelling units at BRAS, the said 81 trical Inspector reports that the proper of these existing itions is the Installation of additiomt 20 capacity circus and Outlets in the kitchen and the ins tiara of an outsids light over the rear dixm►ay with an inside nest i VNEW". on August 3I, 1965 Willism SandV., City of Fridley and Heating Inspector, utspected the property and reported the Ealing conditions Leh in the opinion of the Plumbing and Inspector Impair required 1 -home Fire rating of the f voom and which require the foilowiny, or equal repairs: M - 'i 11 J E A 1ilZJG AT 5665614 • 6TH 82 CV !i 3f ffi MUG A HAZARDS I . too. If (a r-, REPAIR OH RMMAL C' TIM $TRUCZM LOCAM ' NOR`PH$AST IN THB CM OF FMLEY BY REAM $TRIICTtIiHi 1 111ttBAS, on August 13, 1965 James H. Heae 'ley, City of Fridley 110 officer and Building Inspector, inspected the property and e�ted the following itions: 1. Improper st rage of garbage. 2. Improper g of garbage. 3. Garbage littered on the grounds. 4. Front and rear premises littered with trash and refuse. 5. Overgrowth Of weeds. WNIRBAS, on August 23, 1965 Leonard Bicbmailler, City of Fridley a�trical Inspector, inspected the property and reported that tgtrical outlets in tie kitchen of each dwelling unit are poorly �sted'necessitating a use of an excessive number of drop cord mlections and thereby causing a hazard. WHEREAS., the said 11lectrical inspector reported that no outside Obt exists over the or entry to provide security for the tenants t'eoable users to avoid hazards at the rear of the dwelling units at lkt. VURL►AS, the said lectrical Inspector reports that the proper 7 of these exist conditions is the installation of additional ZOl+tslese capacity cur its and outlets is the kitchen and the Inotallation of as outs do' light over the rear doorway pith an inside switch. WHEREAS, on August'31, 1965 William Sanden, City of Fridley mi#binig and Beating Inspector, inspected the property and reported :' Ifollowing conditi which in the opinion of the Plumbing and m#be Inspector impai the required 1 -hour fire rating of the cgace rooms and which require the following or equal repairs: 161 I. 162 MMbWUM NO. I Al On ONUMM TM UP= M POWAL (F ME STBUCTtAC± 7AC' M AT l$IWO - 691 8 T VMMM T IN M MY OF nIDTZY BY 88ABON tW INM A HA2AR1lM . 'NOMM9 on AuEF42 1 , 1965 James 8. 1feaeley, City of Fridley Weal Officer and Inspector inspected the property and M" the folloet itians: 1. Improper atoage and burning of garbage. 2. Front and re premises litterdd with trash and refuse. 3. overgrowth o Creeds. i on Amast , 1965 Leonard McbmIller, City of Fridley Bloc ad Inspector, ted the premises and reported that the elec ad outlets in the kitchen of each of the dwelling snits use poor ioaated necessitat the use of an excessive u=ober of drop cord tions and causing a hazard. SAS, the said 81 trical Inspector reported that no out side light, * dater over the re entry to provide security for the teaante and e0oble users to avoid at the rear of the dwelling units at The said 81 ctrical Inspector reports that the proper r these existing tions is the installation of additional L=Xan pacity circuit and outlets in the kitchen and the of an outside light over the rear doorway with an inside the 0 CAB, on August iand Heating Ins M"S conditions 20SPector 400"r moos am *IA , 1965 William Sendibt City of Fridley tor, inspected the property and reported ich in the opinion of. the Plumbing and e required 1 -hour fire rating of the quire the following or equal sepairss RESOLUTiON NU, 1965 I II A RESOLptiONIAUTHORIZING AND',DIRECTING THE COMBINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSKNTS ON LOT 2, PARCELI1000 AND LOT 3, PARCEL 1400, AUDITORS' SUB. #78. WHEREAS ortain special assq to cert lln land and said fang NOW, TH RIEFORE BE IT RESOLVEI That the ssessments levied to -wit:' Lot 2, Parcel 1000 Sub. #7 ,'may and shall be al Lot 2, alcal 1000, Auditor 11"a be # 78 Lot 3. lreal 1400, Aud i for l�s l Sub. #78 Div Lot 2 &b Parcel 1200, • Auditor Sub. #78 i ADOPTED OF ATTEST: THE CITY COUNCIL 1 965 - rtarvin ti. 5sments have been levied with respect has subsequently been combined. as follows: gainst the following described parcels, rid Lot 3, Parcel 1400, Auditor's pbrtionod and combined as follows: Fund Original Amount Reg. S.A. $ 7.657039 Reg. S.A. W34 (Water Lateral) Fund Reg. S.A. W34 (Water Lateral) 6,017.62 3,819.3_0 $17,494.31 Original Amount $13,675.01 3a819-30 $17,494.31 THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY MAYOR - William J. Nee 0 1-6 to • 0 A 888aIiI7.'i011 8FI AND CALLING A PI TUN OF CSI - F, SAS, the eo In the interest a *M thereby. BE IT 88.SO009 met 1. That the p and Davis, accepted. is + M �. ;i 1„1 � ;+►' �. II II' 1; ti i f• W11" u • C4403411:1" 13' L:1; 11� Mt11 i traction of certain improvemeaste is deemed the City of Fridley and the propelrty osaars the City Council of the City of Fridley as report submitted by Comstock ad is hereby received and 2. That this it will meet on the 4th day of October, 19 5 at 8 :00 o'clock P.M. at the City Sa11 is the ity of Fridley for the purpose of holding a lie Hearing on the improvement noted in the Not attached hereto and made a part thereof by ference, Exhibit "All. 3. That the proposed to be assessed for said iniprovew meats and of them as noted in said notice are all the lands areas as noted in said notice; all of the same to be assessed proportionately accosding to the benefits received. 4. Shat the C1 Manager is authoriwed and directed to give notice of such Public Hearing by publishing a notice th f in the official nompaper of the City of Fridley to law, such notice to be sub - stantially the form and substance of the notice attached h to as Exhibit "A ". w isar.L r. OF TIM CITY OF FBIMmo THIS � r . 1465. MAYOR - William J. Nee 164 L A. B. r] kL- .Y Oncz�, Pt18LICATION 7 OF FRIDM cR2DZ8IT A) MWelZ M tWAVTW- nN 1'v"a 165 MRMS, The City Council of the City of FridleRys Anoka Countys, Beata, has deemed i necessary and expedient that the impsavemeatts e4oafter described b made. NOW, 'i11111111I'OBE, E TS MM GIM TART on the 4th day of ob4w& 1965, at 8 :00 'clock PA., the City Council will meet at the Sall in said City, land will at said time, and place, hear all t interested in s id ements in whole or in part. The general na of the improvements ie the construction (in the and streets noted below) of the following improvements,, to -wit= Sanitary Sewer and dater Mains and Laterals and sezrice cosnection. 1. To serve all lots in Dan's 5th Addition. ,2. Bast -West eas t located apprazimately 250 feet south of Mississippi P e between. Bast River Road and Riverview Tenvae. 9. North side of Osborne Road between Rest Riven Road and railroad tracks. SI Sewer and Appir teoances. 1. Don's 5th Adds Sly and Dover S is in the 500 block• 3. Fridlw Street betweaa 66th Avenue and 67th Avenue. 4. Mississippi Place at Riverview Terrace. Ca/vi . • • . • • • e • a • • r e . e • • • • '1M M AM TO 1% ASSMSED FM SAID IS AS =AM: II I i K I �0 ' iGG w obit "All Aedt No. 73.8 - Faae 2 ii0118tXLll,'tfm £ items and 3 Sht3ve . ...R��rs..�.y..w.. «.,...r��r.. All of the laud abuttimS upon said streets nod above and all. adjacent and abu tip thereto. All of said land be assessed Proportionately ac=dIm to the �W:L� received by Imptovementse 9tat the Council es to proceed with each of said laopmements sepmte imprav►emen , except as hereafter otherwise ptavidei by do a cil all under the olloving authority, to t: 3�t=eaota Lo 1953* h'wego►tor 398 and lm, a mdatory thereof and In conf mity with the City Fujb��ahs .....r. DAY OF 1965 COMM, ��w�r ■M i� if OR �Yi�F im J. Nee - s n U BQU� iW API' &M 1dMMG �MMS IMP 1S, 1965 I i The gifting was called to order by Chairman Nawrocki at 7 05 P.M. PWAWTa Nmorockis Fitzpatrick, Goodrich and Jankowski We that Sass AM=: Saunders its vas present and discussed the variance request with the board. by Fitzpatrick, ed by Goodrich, that the board recommend variance be gran Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, WO Navrocki decl the motion carried. rein$ no further Ottally submitted, !h. Wagner chary to the Board Chairman Naerocki declared the meeting ls7 u 0 U Tim HOUTES or To spscz A Spec Conseil Msetiag of Nee, 1 T Motion Thompson to reel elect lore as follows: PA 14 In ac the C be as W -1 P-1 W-1 P-2 W-1 P-3 W -2 P-1 W -2 P-2 W3 P-1 W -3 P-2 W-3 P-3 TOTAL: CMUCIL HM MG or SSPMM 15, 1965 September 15, 1965 was called to order by Rirkhaa, Wright and certify that the results of the SiECTUR HM 1965 r atiee with Beetles 4,08 of the Charter of the City of Fridley, y Council declares the results of the 1965 Primary Biection to o�,lors: The total mimber of ballots cast vas: 3095 VWd 1 - Precinct l 189 Waded 1 - Precinct 2 548 Ward 1 - Precinct7� 'Wand 2 - Precinct Waded 2 - Precinct 528 Waded 3 - Precinct 1 45 Wined - 3 - Precinct and 3 - Precinct TOTAL: ..... 3095-- The vote for each candidate, and aneber of defective and not vot3d ballots is as follows: 1 1") 9 Not Voted and/or T. S. Grels J.B. Plemal Defective Total ...._.62... - .A_..., _2._ .I89 .....136_ -._ ....A.__ 92 _...6_ .-. 112 3 _.i?a..,. -..._ ..... 2 654► 39 25 3095 • W -L P-3 W-2 P-t W-2 P-2 W3 P-1 W-3� P-2 W-2 P-3 Tom: C. co I Dav f lG9 • AT - Y.jBGS Not Voted Glen w ash /or 2!a &e 8. Wa it Pix►. Defoct wt lbtai 13 -...._ 5 .. X3 9. 4E8 9 7 sb$ 31 179 IT 7' _.,,12_,,,�,.� ' .._,...�.. .._.:.....r. r....::. 21 120 32 87 456 198 6 ..,,;. 1 i9 206 755 II following tM pe le are hereby doclared entitled to have theft al�wrs PI"" *A a1 slectfon Ballot for Mayor on Wirer 2,. 296.5. J. MM JWK 0. Inum was Placed on the <h lgov=h a 2, 1965. Ple are bereby declared entitled to have tbef moral Blectirou Ballot for Co mciinen -at -SIP GUM V. TRMUM DAIV3b o. BAR= U I� U F. Mars . Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mss. Mrs. Mrs. Mars. Mss. Mrs. Mrs. Mss. Mrs. Mss. ins. Mss. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. l�s . Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mies. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. ; Mss. ; Mrs. 1 Mrs. 1 Mrs. 1 Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mrso N SON" of the judges Marcucci A Norton is Dofties Miller lollsuth AW Colleen " vanns 0 Pettit Schreiner At Ubksa I* McClellan 0 Bntoth 0 O1son I Uylins L Lueders ne Chase .ette Bourdeaux lred Kaiser ,Lan Vogler is Hubley :e Schmidt Brck >y Jo Schmedeke i Raiser itel Kusyk e Msadloh antis MaLtwghlien sine Mondloh nice Hebiesen lada Saunders a Mori itty Jean Ritter ale Hadtrath J. Gabrielson sold Jansen of election are as follows: 1- 2- 1 t. d Mr. Immg Sivarts lfts. Jacqueline Boat Mrs. Doan Bobarg Mrs. Houard Scbults Mr. Charles Rawa�r Mrs . Helen Fowler Mss. A. S. Jett* Mies. Helen Bourgeois Mss. R. J. Kobk Mrs. Joaoane Kays Mrs. Kathy Luhreses Mss. William Jemmsea Mrs. Eva Matsek Mss. Dorotby Houck Mies. Basel Anderson Mrs. Doris Nord Mrs. Gesera Bennett Mrs. Wisnie Tormoen Mrs. Clarence Mitchell Mrs. Arlene Peterson Mrs, Walter Nelson Mrs. Madera Johnson Mrs. Gloria Sum"on Mrs. Bur'gaft Bblis Mrs. Pat Le3t2T Mfrs. Evelyn Selimmski Mrs,, Gerald Adams Ms. NOW lan Lee Mrs. Marlys Wollum Mrs. Marvel Paterson Mrs. Adeline Haidle Mr. Harry Nawrocki Mrs. Shirley Pitala Mrs. Carol Torsen Mrs, Rita Mo Pierce 170 0 Mrs. Mrs. Mrs Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. M=s. Mrs. Mars a Mrs. Mrs. Nts. Mrs. • Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. Macs. Mars a Mss. Mo. Mra0 Mfrs a Mrs. Mf'e o Mrs Mass. Itzs. Mss. Mrs Mrs • Mrso Mars o Mare a Ord Y3asssn ! lawtson ! Jobasarud e Manley h Sr►ans ine Stwaso . s Carnaall Htuytzbai wi Freessn prarst Julkovski as Ries ►ia Gillund uutte Aiumock S Tarthof tte Real* R"ortson Mathew ,la Afar Jobnson use Odland Holmquist U Stone � Rawos Dsvore wd Hamsc® %we Anderson ilyn Nelson Le Baker n Gerrard ttd Whitcomb Miss Walsfeld Phelan +i Heanderson ,sea 9dstrom L Tre"fels Gorsyski wst twok I Uffsk c .r Mr. Toga Cochran Mrs. lyrgsret raudsoa Mrs. Sylvia Marrs Mrs. LeRoy Busboy Mrs. Helen Chsasette Mrs. Bose Jasper Mrs. Lois Mullin Mr. Douglas White Mrs. Judith Dresbar Mrs. Lucille Western Mr. Aemeth ROria Mrs. Janice Drigans Mr. John Parks tp[twn= 2 Mr. David Chasten Mrs. Joan Wolter Mrs. Leona Flaming Mrs. Claire Marsaadk Mrs. Barbara Gobmam I&S. 8. R. Harland Mfrs, Basest Powell Mrs. William Bradley i'iL11s. US BossiA Mrsa Richard Lovlies Mar. Roger Harstid Mrs. Jaadee 3rudea Mies. Vernie Petwrsem Mars. Grace Szesda Mrs. Betty Skjw*old Mfrs. Christine Peterson Macs. Mildred Watkins Mrs. Valens Pious Mar. Eduard Fits"trick Mars. Lester Hwgerford Mrs. Pearl Sasditras Mr. Paul Peterson Mr's. Jean aiacluam► Mrs. myrtle Hasson an. Region Markomw ?L71 172 • Tin I;MWM tar THE BM Ia(g=XL SZTLNG 159 1965 - Page 4 I 'I I' 'I i I PAYM - WILU M J. I= it Tie tiaa was seconded 8irkham. Upon At voice vote, there being SO w"p that motion carried immluously. Uo �motftg was ad jouxv" M tfvlly submitted* II, ti. Btntnaei�, Are 8eesetary to the xtwAl i I I i II, it I , • A RESOLUTI ASSESSMENI WHEREAS, certain I NOW, THEE That the to-wit: apportior Dry Lot 14, 1 Auditor. RESOLUTION NO. 1965 IN .AUTHORIZING AND DI CTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL LOT 14 (PARCEL 9 0). AUDITOR'S SUB, #92. stain special assess nts have been levied with respect to aiId and said land has ubsequently been subdivided. E~ORE BE IT RESOLVED. as followso a $etssment levied agal st the following described parcels, t 14 (Parcel 900), A ditor's Sub. ##92, may and shall be a and divided as follows: Lot 14, P Auditor's Pa� rcei Fund Original Amount Gel 900 Reg. S. A. Fund (WSSM, St) $ '430.22 b. #92 SW 48B Sewer Lat. (i Service) 1948B.65 SW 48B Water Lat. (1 Service) -- $2,608.69 Parcel Approved Fund Orialnal Amount pal 900 Reg. S. A. Fund (WSSM, St) $ 292.05 6b. #92 SW 488 Sewer Lat (I Service) '.1,075078 SW 48B ater Lat (l Service) 505.91 N.53' of the W.165' Reg. :.A;w:und (WBSM, St) 138.17 of Lot 14, SW 48 r Lateral 412.87 Auditor's Sub. #92 SW 486 Water Lateral 183.21 $2,608.69 ADOPD BY THE CITY COUNC DAY F II I, I ATTEST: C VW n L OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 1965. MAYOR - W i 11 lam J. Nee 173 PATS AND' SOB-CM41ITTU MEETING MINVIES _FOR SEPT 2, 1965' • The meetUW was called to ordesj at 8:20 P.M. by Chairman Hughes at City Hall. M I , Psesent: Baghes, Donlinn, Sampson, Cochran Others Pz*omt: Tom Hodue, Gene Peterson, Paul Brown The resdinjg',of the minutes of last meeting were put aside. Chair®aa briefed both mss on what the Parks and Playgrounds Sub - Committee expected o the: in the Way of la site, plan for Locke Park (104 acres) and River front proserties. HONE: • HUGMS: ROOM: ►6 • Or. Bodge gave the following outline of what the committee could expect In the way of a plan. Areas for study fall 1. Community 2., 1 Next he outlined what li Eder the following catagories. gional 3. Neighborhood a. Playfields b. Playgrounds c. Play Lots to considers li 1;. What is needed? Z,, Evaluation needed. 3. What potential has the aria? 4. Programi, from the outside to the inside and vice versa. 51 0 Site plan is then 'ready - Preliminary plans for maximum ass. O�owed examples of oth r park planning Mr. Hodne has done. Told of what plan of attack Id be followed: 1a Preliminary 2. DOtail 3. Landscape 4. Buildings ded his presentationlwith the point that population forecast would important in the overall long range plane of our entire park stem in Fridley . fluted out to Mr. ftd� that Locke Park is No. 1 on the Committees 'ioarity list of areas t apopdl that we startvith Locke Park and River Front areas and s«e up with a cost of'these park rates plans in respect to phases. y out program and get cost of same. Mr. Gene Peterson will be +eject captain for s job, de a motion that & Associates proceed to present a prelirsiaary moning program and t of same for Locke Park and River Sites. eanded and motion carried. I0 0 0 Ttu Pmatdy lLggr0unds Sub- ttse recommends to the Streets and Utilities Sob- Camimi as easement of 2 feet along the north boundry sod the east bonodry 1 of Lot 3,- Block of d1w MWes River Lots for ""am of lutwx access to Island. t 6010arnoti00 of a 3 million 841100 water reservoir at Comseos Park., Z=Tatlon and P1 s Sob - Committee wish to have complete given o the coastsuctio0 of this tank to make it *80ble for retreat activities. R�Ss >�eoeived a letter the Fridley ;Cgs pcopusing construction of a >oaks7► 83ak to be talled at Ceereons Park. COCs a motion that Parks and Playgramds Sub-Committee receive letter from the 1C's sad commwticate the committees opp "latim OW this offer and ve the idea in general to the X's. Preferring the rink be 1 adjacent to out recreational skating area for so": of o4iateasnce upkeep. Directing Past Brown, Parks mmd tio0 Director work with the X's pertaining to final site ion and details and report back to committee for final approval. LU 11 �SOOrrded and Passed. i 1= gull 1111 31MMI *sed for full time Vok , Superintendent status for the Psrks D-1 "lint.- RUG888= SAMPSOWs A Untim t SAM NA Ew"MUMA to a e MrIqrMt t gMjblt da-to.p cad Passed. Olommittee desires work move along an this site as to renewal of 9mmat T ridge area p tree removal of slops and creek bed saw plus slope of park. The Paul adjourned at lot SS P.R. Oil teot V 209, admitted, ector of Parks $too P.M. at City Ball Recreatiomt, City of Fridley L� 0 9 9-1, T" 1. Heating I 7 Aumn JhI�V�Y 8 llectrical 17 41 1965 1964 THIS TM TIPS OP Ct CTI0�4 A1�9 AW To D4lTH Rasidentia�., Maltiplo *lings �4 29 its Residantio I"ragas $4 20 101 Alteratio I& Additions �4 4 912 Multiple iliW 10 0 I Comewcial 2 1 8 Industrial 0 0 0 amicipal 0 0 I churches & pools 10 0 1 Hospitals 0 0 1 Signs 113 4 25 Moving 10 0 3 117 58 1,068 Heating I 7 Plumbing 8 llectrical 17 41 33 i 1 0 so Residentiali $ 26705C Residential 0aragas 46942 Alteratiews46 Additions 1,612979 Maltiplo *lings 22,075 Commercial 140, 0a Industrial 13,029,31 m0nicipsl Churches & l�khools Hospitals signs 5,50 Moving i 29072,21 52 313 38 325 51 7" 41 1,3 $ 477, 300.. $ 2,036,070 32,356 145,859 f 13,700 8,015,315 1 0 27,000 1 $00,000 690,000 1 0 0 I 0 1,500 I 0 57,995 1 0 2,000,000 1,500 22,075 1 0 20,500 1,3 , 13,029,31 FAST TM TO DATE 173 69 31 45 3 6 0 3 0 it' -- 1 289 266 3 29859,285 102,735 51,•120 1,396,000 835,000 .493,000 0 661,320 0 3,130 0 69601, — S 0 i • U 0 F-tt t$oetrioa��. � 1�+e�►natin� Gas Gmeral 9"ting Roust Noriog Masonry 01-1 Reat* pla taring Plumbing Roofing Sigma void Or1111w #8294#8423 #5327 -#SS01 #3270-43341 #371"3723 71 1,065 27 605 41 615 269 6,725 57 855 . 3 45 ._. 31 465 is S 75 19 285 66 990 9 135 is 225: . 2 30 113 „915 P1T MLS 1945 21,964 'L IS YUS IM TZAR 1,508 # 2,184 ; 16,1% 91856 98150 573 9,4x24 6,167 SO 754 6,306 4,626 1.736 617 5,584 6,306