The URL can be used to link to this page

10/04/1965 - 5938�e IMEWAL Regular 9eetinge Sept 200 1965. Pages 1 - 310 IL, On AssaaeM It Roll - SS&SMS (Continued from 8/23/65, 9/7/65 and 9/20/65)e Page 320 20 On Asseae t Roll -• 1965 Service Cowiecations, Pages 33 & 340 3. On throve meat - SSS.S"73 -$ a Pages 35 & 36. OLD BIIS SS= 40 Resolution Conidrming AssesmaMt Roll - SSSOW"8e (Tabled 8/23/65® 9/7/65 and 9/20/65)0 Pages 37 - 400 50 Amt to Chapter 56 - Sighs (Tabled 8/16/65 and 9/20/65)9 Pages 41 - 500 ' 60 Ordinance Amending Chag7ter 24 - Paris and Ii0- ation Camission (Tabled 9/20/65)9 Pages 51 - 530 70 OVdlnayc O DesignRting C9'titptW 20 -- Handbill Distribution (Tabled 9/20/65), Pages 54 - 580 80 Reaffirming Resolution No- 144 -1965 (Tabled 9/20/65)e Pages 59 - 610 i 90 Second RaWAM of Ordinance to Amend Section 77o01 - Beadh Closing* Page 62, loo Second heading of AM%aviation Oacdixwaee •- 1966e Page 630 110 sift - Compact Car (Opened Noon, October 4, 1965'9 Pages 64 - 69. 120 Building Permit - 6001/6005 ilniversity Avenue Northeast - Hardblafava, s 13, Buildl:V Permit & variance - 616 Rice Creek Terrace -p Seigriste Pages 70 - 720 140 Building Permit & variance - 565 - 57th Avmue Noctheast - Bri ctkson, Pages 73 & 74 15, Building Bond meeting Minutes, Saptai 11 ac 1 22, 1965, Page 750 16. Safety Coadaittee Meeting Minutes, September 300 1965, Pa" 76. 17a Planning Coaaaxission Meeting Minutes, September 23, 1965, Pages 77 790 1S o Fridley Housing and Radevet aLzi -ent Authority Meeting Minutes, Segue 15, 19650 Pagers 80 - 830 19. Fridley Housing and Redevelopm Nit Autb=lty Meeting Minutes, Septedxw 22, 1965, Pages 84 - 91. 20. v- Heart Cesaetfty RepoWt, Pages 92 - 94. 21. Co=►ications, Pages 95 & 96. tai Samwson: Speaiml Assesttmsnts �� 9(o A �SGB j!►j Hodne: Service Drives '� vsssTa�s: 22. Claims, Page 97, 23e 88timatese Pao" 98 - 100. 24. Licenses, Pages 101 & 1020 25. Satimete - SmJ.14V & Assoeiste6 .. Blu"Winting and Reprodutstior:0 26. Agreement - MinneapOlis GIW CCgPWW, 27. Tennis Courts - Moore Lake Beadb., Page 1030 28. SUPPlONOtal AgrQWAnt - FrUdley-Columbia HeUbts, SS#12* 290 Agreement - Fridley- Colud3ia Heigbhts - Bscrow Funde, SS#12, Pages 104 & lose 30. Appointment, Page 106. i 31e of M.S.A. Heeringe Page 107- 0 • REGULAR COUNCIL PBLMNG AGSHM - OCTODER, 4, 1965 (Continued) 32. Ouuige Order #1 - ST. 1965 -2, 33. Change Order #2 - ST. 1965 -1a Page lose Page 109, 34, Two Resolutions Splitting Special. Assessumwts - Lot 149 Auditor's Subdivision 092 and Lots 1 - 78 Block 2, Oak Grove Addition, Pages 110 & 111. 35, Resolution Coanfirm M Assessment Roll - 1965 service Connections, Pages 1.12 - 115. 36. Y�es01utio�n�Ordering the ovement, Final Plans and Specifications - SSSM*73 -9,9 Pages 116. I ?6) -- 1 950 37. Two #re solutLo s CertifyiM Charges to the County, Pages 117 - 122. 38. ResoAt�io i Autho ci.sing Agraermink with Columbia Heights - SS#12, Page 123. 39. R ation setting Election and Designating judges, Pages 124 - 133, 40. Resolution setting Special Ballot for Bond Election,Pages 134 & 135. tion � 41e Res�l fyi g Delinquent Water 0%arges to County Auditor, Page 1360 42. Resolution Declaring Necessity for Mill Levy in Excess of 30 Mills,,- Pages 137 & 138. 43. Resolution Certifying Reeds to County Auditor foot 1966, Page 1390 44. Resolution Approving Execution of Agseoomt #54803 with Minnesota Highway Page 140. LL UMBEL Z IC kB�R�k97 s 1. CM ASSESS '1' ROIL - SS&W #58 Cc=nT D mw 8/23/65, 9/7/65, 9/20/65)2 The Notice of Homing is on Page 32. 1 have talked to Leonard Cochran several times and tried to set up meatings with him,, the last one for yesterday, but he has not-come in to see ime. 2. ON ASSUSININT R04L - 1965 SBRV= COHMCTICUSI The Notice of Hearing is on Pages 33 and 34. The Assessment Roll is included in the envelope with the agenda, 3. ON IWROV8NW3T - �Ssa 73 -4: The Notice of Hearing is on Pages 35 and 36. The Orelis UUMY Assessment Roil is included in the envelope with they agenda. 20 AMMAs 4. RESOLUl'10N C ASMS8DEM ROLL - SS#58 (TABLED 8/23/65; 9/7/65, 9/20/65) s'i Ths Resolution is an Pages 37 throw: 40 and depends upon: the 'public Hearing in item 01, above. .S. PROPOSRD TO =LP'l= 56 - SXMS (TAM= 8/16/65, 9/20/65) s The Ordinance is 'cu Pages 41 throUgh 50, 6* ORa ADIMIR t33ABTgIt 24 -PARKS AND . W'iCRB'iATIOig OOMR =8820N (TABLED 9/20/65): The Ordinance is on Pages 51 through 53. 7. ORDINAMM DESK 9/20/65): The 8. RBA"IRMW I lution is on 9 0 SECOM RM=13 OF The Ordinance for 10.. SXCOMD RV DIM OF second readu% wi 630 110 SIDS - CCOWACT *best* are an • 66 through 690 CHAPTZR 20 - BABILL DZSTRI$UMM (TABLED as is on Pages 54 through 58. x(a so, 1444 -1965 (TABLED 9/20/65): The Reso- 59 through 61. O`iDZNAI'M T4 AMM SBCTIOON 77.01 - BEAD CiraBlROs second reading is an Page 62. APPROPRIMCXT o3tD1EANCB .. 1966s . Tho Ovdinance 9W the addition of one -half polieemaa, is an Page (MUM ZED. OCTO= 4, 1965): Hid tabulation 64 and 65. and the specificatiam are an Pages FAVAs Discussion on this at the Septenber 20th meeting is on Paga 24o At this wri-4ing I have no additional info=ntion. is, Bu ==G mG knwns 22a 1965: The minutes are on Page 75. ' I will have tbe various supporting plans and specifications for your consideration at the meting. All four items were appro led by the Building Board. 16* • SAMY COM==1 iMBTXNG MMMS - 88PTMW= 30. 1965$. These min - eases are on Page ' 76 0 The spprove3 the ingress and egress for the R owl way store at the Northeast corner of University and Mississippi. T will have they plans and specifications . at the g for yeas consideraatioa® 17. PLAWXOG SS�ON HMXHG HIME$ - SEPT== 23, 1965: These minutes arc on POgees 77 through 79. There are two. actio,asa under Stem #1 an Pages 77 and 78„ on first of which the Co=11 would set a Public Hearing on the rezoning if you so desire, and on the second of V&ich you q=12d Consider the recwe I lot split if Dr. Lester is prepared to ask for it at the, me:eting O He should have the plans and specifications and site plan available at the Ming for your considerat$.on, There is no action on Items #2 and #3 ou Page 78. in item #4 on Pages 78 and 79s toe Commission r a employing a full -t Park Supe�rinteeadenta In the budget for 1966, $64500 was budgeted by the Park t for this full-time supearinteen- dentD but it was reduced to S4.8O0. gf the Cou>Eacil w1e4es to engage a full -tom superintendent to w9rk under the Parks and Re meation, Director it. would require transterriag $1,700 from the zesesrve for contingeeneies: to the Park and Recsesation portion of they budgeet. This concludes the Planning Com. lion minutes. 18, IaRRUM H060200 AND REDMLttiF'1M�S''tP AUVHOiRXW MMI6 $ASS - SBP� l5 0 1965t These Minutes are an Pages 8o tbrough 83. Ate' item you wish to 'discuss cuss car► be discos sea at this time. • 21, aCATIOUS Est sampSoa: Special Assessments: The letter on Page 95 is self - explanatory. The Face Directcx sepoocts on the letter on Page 96. (b) 8odnes Service Delves: Mr. 8odne asked to be placed on the agenda; but I do not have amsy comamun3aemartion as get. He probably will bring it to the msoesting. 22. : 2he claims numbers are on Page 97. Detail of the claim is Included in the eavelope with the agenda. 23. SS S: A listing of thO detIMMUS to be conmz�dezea by the council is found on Page 98. Derma cleanup are its* - ised on Page 99e and the LLeg %e Sill is on Page 100. These latter two are not on the List on Page 98. 24. LICUMS: Tb* lica wm are listed an Pages 101 and 1020 They bave been checked out by the Building Inspection Dap .1 1, 25. MOTIM M& SHIMY & ASSMIKISS - BL 2 - RI STING am 1-9-1 r : A dis3cuss3ioa of this estimette in on Pages 25 and 26. I SmVWt to bave an itaoiaed estimate fro® smiler & Associates by .Coenail meeting t3aae. 260 - �' APOZIS GAS emwa Y: At this writU g e I have no agraeuw�nt available for council consideration. -It appears that pea:haps the Gas Company will witbd raw its request foac the iastall- ation of a gas linos at this time. If they should deafte to prm a m ede they Dave advised that they will accept any City Conditions relative to the insataliati oar as part of the permit. %%U could be handled administratively with final approval of the city AttoxnW as to the anoont of protection the city is cbtaiuisag. if the moil so 4e84 l ye e • I' e" , t q; �.' Nay 1� i, a` i. • • 4^ • 27. 22MIS COURTS - NO= L&M SM 3 A new bid notice for October 180 1965 is on Page 1038 if the Council wishes to call for bids. This is on the agenda because of Council action on Page 23. 280 SUPPIMNINTAL - FBtMM -CIA HXXGHTS STO M BBWSR #121 Discussion of this agreemalt and the one in Item 029 will be found on Pages 28 and 29 of the minutes. At this writing, I do not have this agreement, but it probably will be available by Monday night. 290 ACBiSiaSA1T - Fes- COLOMBIA MICBrrS ZSCROW FUADS - SS#12: The proposed is on Pages 104 and 105. Coluaabia HeiShts has not reviewed it yet0 300 APPOINTUM: The appointmmt on Page 106 is reCOd by the Liquor Store Xvmger and aVaelfe and the information is mdf- eowlanatorye 31. MW OF X S.Ao MARMs The hearing notice on Page 107 is self- aocplana<toarye " • 32. CUM= OAR 01 - ST 1965 -2a This a order an P 108 is fac ST. �9 a+8a storm drains previously alppraved by the Council in a memo from the City Rngineer, WhIdh take the water under 7th Street into the pondd- Ing area in the Reidel property. 33. C HAN= QVJMR #2 - ST. 1965 -1a This Change order an Page 109 is necessary because it was discovered that there was a sprung in Riverview Terrace There it swings north along the Riveawood School property, and it was necessary to put in the drain to take the water out of the sub -base. 34e IWO 1SSOi1UT1= SP1I'713MG SeSCIAL ASSSSSMBAIT8 - LOT 148 AWVORIa StMDMSZM #92 An LOTS 1 - 7,v BLACK 2* ORK GRO YS AWN209i These two resolutions an Pages 110 and 111 are the usual routine reso- lutians. 35* RolSOLUTIGS :1010 ASSS SMBNT ROLL - 1965 SSStVICa CTI01�S a This resolution an Pages 112 thrc uoh 115 depends upon the public hearing in Item #28 above. 36. RBSOLUTIOM CRUM= TM IUiQAtyVSIlICNT a FML PLANS Am snWIC TIOWS e 10 - 83k73 -8: This resolution as Page 116 dspsads upon ohs public heating its Item We above. E 39. RESOLUTION S$'MIiiG SLNCTIOa l ANA D$SIMATUG JUDGES: The Vswauticu is at Pages 124 through 126, and the gist of judges is on Pages 127 through 1330 40. RESOLUTICU SUTT=G SPECIAL BALLOT FOR B= 9TRCTION: The resolution is on Page 1340 and the Notice of Sl -,tjm is on Page 135. The City AttorwW has broken the bond issue into the three differe nt projects but final dete ration rela tLve to tUja depends upon the Council. Ap 41*' RBSOLUTZO T CBRTEFMG l3 LIM I' WATER CHARMS TO COUNTY AUDITOR: The resolution is on Page 136. Schedule A is included in the envelope with the agendao for the five hers of the Council only. 42. RESOLU'1TICK ENCZAMG MMSSITY FM A MYLL LEVY IN MMSS ©F 30 MZLLSs The resolution on Pages 137 and 138 is self- aalanatory. 43, RESOLUTXW CERTIFYXHG TO COMM AUDITOR PM 1966s The r48 lution on Page 129 certifies the needs to the CouV*y AUditor, which :would result in a =III rate of not over 43.5763 =LUs. RRSOLMCV APPROVING CLMXGR (W #54803 ffit'RT; XMMSOTA RZOMAY SPARMUNTS This resolutions on Page 140 is COXXacteeKi as per discussion on Page 30o The agZaawnt will be redgaant as per discussion on Page 30 as soon as pose lblee. .PMZM&2MMML Because of lack of time, there are saaaee items fray previous meetings for which I do not have all the details o if I can caaplete sous of these by Monday night, and the mestIM is not too IM9s I would liket to acid them. They are: (1) Feasibility of Maintenance Report - Re: Petition #24°1965. (2) vacation: SAV #6S -02, Reduce present 30 Foot 8aisse awt to conventional 12 Foot Basement,, Also® Mike Hafrew Krauts acceptance of cmaplete d utilities in Melody Minor. If he cc sects certain minor deeficiaencies by Monday trite, we will "present these to you felt acceptance. E - -.THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL PIEBMG OV SEPTEMBER 20, 1965 A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fridley was called to order by Mayor Nee at 8205 P.M. ROB Calls Members Present: Nee, 8 .z1d%am, Wright, Thompson (lboup►son left at 12:15 A.M.) iiobers Absents Sheridan OVAL or am -- BROM 9MCIL MIMTING OF SEPT== 7 1 Motion by Kirkham to adopt the minutes of the regular.Council Westing of September 7, 1965 with simendiments as follows: On page 10, paragrapb 3, delete the vords"Parks" and "Recreation" and substitute, therefore, the vow" . "Police". "Streets". . On line 3, page 11; lines 26, 28, 29, 30 aad-line 36, page 12--delete the words "Taxpayers Association" and substitute, therefore, "Fridley Tax Study Group". Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nay *, the motion carried unenimoasly. APUMAL OF _MINUTES - CANVASSOF ELECTION. SEPTSMBBR 13. 1965: a Motion by Wright to adopt the minutes of the Canvass of Election of September l3, 19659 Seconded by Thomson. Upon.a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimouslyo PUBLIC HEARING ON ASIBUSSMT ROLL - 0 & SW $58 (C�+1TI = P80M 9171653 2 ill. ^ir��l. ■ Il�ipri�l . Motion by Wright to continue to the regular Cowell Meeting of October 4, 1965 the Public Rearing ©a-Assessment Roll SBW #58. "Seconded by 2hoopson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unaaimously4 �. 1966 ,BtIDET .SCOI- =' n8D TWCL►f 917/_ 65) s, Mr. W. R. Tbnco and Mr, Whitmore of the Fridley Teat Study Group were present at the Council Meeting. 'Mr. T ico stated that he wished to question the Council concerning the budget for legal services given on page 10. Be asked vby there was an increase Lu the budget for 'Legal services from $6,200 per year to $9,600 per year. Mayor Nee answered that the salary of the City Prosecuter was transferred from the court budget to the legal budget and this is the reason for the increase. Mr. Tonco asked why the salary for temporary employees for the Parks Depwt- ment given on page 25 of the budget vas listed as $130880.009 wbereas, the salary for regular employees, is listed as $9,000.00. Mr. Tonco noted, fsrtbar, that the Recreation Department regular employees' salaries were listed at $4,200.00 and teagorary employees at $23,205.00. Mayor Nee PACE 2 answered that the temporary employees were life guards-for the City beach, . playground directors for neighborhood parks and umpires. Councilman Wright noted that the appropriation item also includes the wages of warming house attendants. Mr. Tonto asked why the fund for contingencies listed on page 29', to so large. He stated that be questions whether thln amount is legal and In accordance with Section 7088 of the City Charter. Mayor Nee answered - that the contingency fund provides an allowance for errors in the budget and for items difficult to plan, such as sum removal. Councibsan Wright noted that the Charter providers that contingency funds. may be 10% in excess of the budget. Mayor Nee stated that the contingency fund is a great deal less than 10% of the budget. He stated that the City wager is to be commsaided for having budgeted very carefully, and that the City Manager always has included a small contingency fund in the budget. Be stated that he believes the budget is well defined and well planned. Mr. Whitmore asked vhy the salaries for election judges and clerks varies as much as 300 from year to year. Mayor Nees answered that the salaries vary because the City assumes that there will not be two elections in a year when there is only a City wide election. He stated that the additional cost of the primary in 1965 will increase the costs for election judges and clerks over and above the amount of the budget. He stated that the City also planned for one shift of election judges to handle the election, but the City found this is not possible during 1965. The Finance Director stated that the budgeted amount for 1965 id loop. He stated that a large turn out at an election produces more work for the election judges and raises the cost of the election. • Mr. Whitmore stated that heobserved that the budget for the band was $1,680.00 plus $150.00 for other iteass. He stated that the band performm only six to eight times per year and has between 6 to 25 attending the band concerts. Be stated that there are perhaps 25 adults in the band, and that this attendance makes the band basically a recreation program for adults. He stated that considering the small attendance this part of the recreation program should be paid for by the adults in the band. Mr. Whitmore stated that only a small group benefits from the band concerts a vhereas, the entire City could use this money elsewhere. He stated that other adult recreation programs such as volley ball and basketball attended by only 6 to 12 adults could be cut franc the budget and the revenue used elsewhere. The Mayor stated that Mr. Whitmore had a good argument. He informed Air. Whitmore that the Council told the Parks and Recreation Departments to cut their budget and they did out the budget of their awm accord and according to their own choosing. Councilman Wright stated that the Parks and Recreation Boards have an asouat given to them in the budget for experimental programs„ Be stated that the band program is one of these experimental prograstm, and that the experimental program is allowed to run for three years. He stated that the band has been running for two years, and it has been noted that the attendance at band concerts has not been very good. He stated that with the addition of a full time Parks and Recreation Director, it vae felt the band should be allowed to run for another year to see whether the Parks and Recreation Director could iwoprove the program and get more interest in it. Councilman Wright stated that the • costs of the band amount to $.15 per household in the City of Fridley. Councilman.Kirkham,sta►ted that the band can contribute to the image of the City. He stated that the band won a prise in competition for the Aquatennial Parade, PAGE 3 and that the band is more therm recreation - it contsritN*.tes to the City image. • Mar. Whitmore stated that he would like to propose a cut in the budget for the band, and although this amount is smell and other cuts suggested by the Fridley Tax Study Group are small, amounting to approximately $3,000, cutting the budget by $3,000 in several places could amount to a substantial nose. He stated that if bland members were charged does of $10 to $20 for the services provided to them, the taxpayers could have the band at no cost. Councilman Wright -stated that there would be no question of charging partici- pants in a recreation program a fee if the program benefits only the people taking part in it. Mr. Whitmore stated that he wished to thank the Council on behalf of the Fridley Tax Study Group for the time given to the Talc Study Group to consider the budget. He stated that the Tax Study Group found the Council has done a good job holding the line on the budget. Mr. Whitmore stated that on behalf of the Police-Commission he wished to ask the Council to consider adding three patrolmen to the police force in this coaxing year. Mr. Whitmore noted that the budget allows for the addition of ona, more patrolman. He stated that the standard police force in a suburban comamity of this size is one patrolman per thousand population. He stated that on this basis Fridley needs 25 patrolmen, and the addition of three patrolmen to the present 15 man force leaves the City far under the requirements. Mr. Whitmore stated that as the City increases in population, the police problems will multiply and could increase faster than the population. He stated that an example of these problems ia'the trouble the City has recently • had with hoards of juveniles in Holly Shopping Center.' Mr. Whitmore stated that the present police budget provides a three car patrol with five men, leaving one man to patrol by himself. He stated that he believes this is a dangerous arrangement and the City could find a patrolman dead in same secluded place for no known reason. Mrs Whitmore stated that the $3,000 cut froaa the recreation, programs could help pay for one additional patrolman. He stated that if the City cuts the budget of the Police Department too sharply, the City will be too far behind year after year. Mr. Whitmore stated that it is easier to compute the number of personel needed by the utility departments than it is to compute the number of men needed on the Police Department, however, Crime Bureau studies recommend the use of one patrolman per thousand population. Mayor Nee stated that the City Manager talked in favor of hiring three addi- tional men. Mars. Edith Evans stated that the City of Fridley is located in a metz'"Utan area. she stated that there are four highways running through the City of Fridley and that traffic and industry bring a lot of people to Fridley. She stated that more robberies are carried out by persons living outside the City of Fridley, and that growth of the City will attract more undesirable characters to the City. Mrs. Evans stated that she does not believe merchants would want to invest in the City of Fridley if they suffer many burglaries and robberies. She stated that the police work three eight hour shifts vhich divided among 16 policemen, with days off for individual policemen and sick leave provides • for, at the mast, five policemeu on duty at any one time. Mrs. Evans stated that the City of Fridley is a large area for five policemen to patrol. Mrs. Evans stated that the City has never before seen juvenile hoards running wild in the shopping center. She stated that she believes the City cannot afford the kind of saving which allows an increase in the crime rate. Mayor Nee PAGE 4 stated that the Council is were that the Police Department is approximately . 60% of recommended strength. Be stated that the Council knows the Police Commission asked for an additional three policemen to be added to the force. A Visitor to the Council Meeting asked whether the Police Commission has data concerning the crime rate and the number of crimes solved. Mr. Wilbur Whitmore answered that the Police Commission has this data but he does not have it with him at the Council meeting. The visitor asked whether the crime rate has increased. Mr. Whitmore answered that the crime rate has increased and -is increasing with the increase in population in the City of Fridley. Mr. Whitmore stated that the Police Department is not losing its war against crime as fast as the population is.ineressing,.- He stated that 66 to 75% of crimes are solved, and the euaber of unsolved crime is increasing even though the ratio is still pretty good. Mr. Whitmore stated that if the police force is allowed to decline below the racczmxnded manpower, Fridley will have a reputation from having an undermauxned police force which will attract undesirable characters to the City and require manning over and above the recommended amount in order to cure the problems which this reputation will create. Mr. Whitmore stated that it does not take juveniles very long to size up the efficiency of the police force. Mr. Whitmore stated that the City is in a fairly good situation now, and should build the police force to a reasonable ratio. He stated that the cost of one murder or one rape, which could have been prevented, is very hard to calculate. The cost of cot life which is taken candt be replaced, whereas, things such as roads and utilities can be repaired and the costs are known. • Mr. Donald Mullin asked whether the ratio of one policeman per thousand population is a recommendation for suburban conibtsnities. Mr. Whitmore answered that this is correct and that the recdomendation. is for communities in the western part of the United States. Mr. Mullin asked what the recommended ratio is for the City of New York. Mr. Whitmore answered it is three men per thousand population. Met. Mullin arcked the recomneaded police force ratio fat the City of Minneapolis. Mr. Whitmore stated that at the present time be believes the City of Mkimeapolle has approximately 1 -1/3 policemen per thousand population. fits. Evans stated that the ratio quested by Mr. Whitmore dogs not include the Park Pdliee in the City of Minneapolis. Mr. Whitmore stated that it also does not include the 54 University Policemen and Private Detectives. Councilman Wright; stated that the population basis upon which the number of policemen were computed also did not include the population of students at the University of Minnesota. He started that this Fridley Police presently patrol Tocke Park and other park areas in the City of Fridley. He stated that, in the future, the City of Fridley plans to add a Park Police Department. Mr. Mullin asked how the City of Fridley compares with other suburbs. Mr. Whitmore auslwered that the suburb of Brooklyn Center has 20 police - for a population of slightly more than 26,000 people. Mrs. Evans stated that Coon Rapids to having an extremely serious juvenile problem, and that the City of Fridley does not want to have such a problem. Mrs. Evans stated that Fridley is part of the Metropolitan area and not a mall totmm, and that the City of Fridley must have a force adequate to meet the problems of a Meetropolitau area. Mrs. Evans stated, further, that she believes policemen should be specialized in their activities and policemen • of the City of Fridley do not have specialized work now. Hafoar Nee asked Mr. Whitmore what help the City obtains from the County. He stated that he believes the County provides a Juvenile Investigator and C� ?AGE 5 perhaps an additional police officer. Mr. Whitmore-stated that the County sheriff patrols the countryside and not the municipalities in Anoka County. He stated that the County-.does-'Provide a Juvenile Investitgator for the City of Fridley and other places in the County. Councilman Wright stated that the cost of an additional policeman is $10,000 to $12,000 per year including the coat of uniform, training and equipment. Mayor Nee asked whether the addition of another policeman to the force makes it necessary to add imAiather' patrol car to the police equipment. Mr. Whitmore answered that at the present time one patrol, car is operated with only. one mama, that the police force works a five day week.and on off days there would not lie five men per shift, He stated that the police force could be increased to 20 men before it would be necessary to add another patrol car to the force. Mayor Nee asked whether there were any other questions or comments concerning the 1966 budget. There were no other commute. Mayor Nee declared the : hearing closed. SECOND 1�EADIHG Off' ORDINANCE #310 CLASSIFYING ADUZ1'ICg1Ai. ZONING DISTRIM0.1 The Acting City Manager read the Ordinance. Motion by Thompson to accept the Ordinance classifying additional zoning districts upon second- reading -and authorize publication of same. Secatded by Wright. Upon a roll, call vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unaninevusly. The Acting City Manager pointed out the location of the - proposed easement on the map. Mayor Nee stated that it is the purpose of this easement to obtain private property in a trade for the easement in order to secure .& nee road easement. Motion by Wright to waive second reading of the Ordinance, to adopt the Ordinance and publish same. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a roll call vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unam►immely. RESOIUTIOH CONFIRMING ASSESSMCNT ROLL - SSW #58; Motion by Kirkham, to table to the regular Council Heating of October 4, 1965 eonsideratiou of the Resolution confirming Assessment Roll SSWW #58. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voids vote, there being no mays, the notion carried unanimously. n DI$Y - COI mmu =iGSTS DRAINAGE MM 917162): Mr. Comstock stated that at the last Council Meeting a letter had been included lei the agenda from the City of Columbia Heights concerning dratoge bale number 934 located .behW'the Robert Hall clothing store in Columbia Heights. Mr. Comstock stated that the Consulting Engineer and the City Engineer no" authorisation to sturdy the project and matte preliminary recoamD,endatims. the City Engineer stated that the Administration wishes the Council to authorise the City to mrork with Columbia Heights to steady the plan, and if the plan is found to be feasible, the Administration will make recommendations to the Council. He stated that the fees fo-x study-_?ng the project would be included in the percent - ,age fee of the project if the project is undertaken. PAGE 6 Notion by Wright to refer to the Administration study of the Fridley- Columbia Heights drainago project for hole #934, authorize the Administration to make a preliminary study, to report to the Council concerning this study and expenditures needed for the project. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. The City Engineer presented a reap to the Council showing locations in the City of Fridley which suffered from back up of sanitary sewers. He stated that many other areas in Fridley had sewer back up In addition to lhe area in Sylvan Sills. The City Engineer stated, further, that the Council should note there have been no recent complaints concerning sanitary sewers. He stated that he believes the high water table and water draining into open mambolea were the major causes of the sanitary sewer back up. He stated that one evidence justifying this conclusion is the fact that complaints were received 15 mutes after it started to rain. He stated that there have been no complaints in recent months. He stated that he believes this problem should be studied on an overall basis rather than only for the Sylvan mills area. Councilman. Wright inquired what the City Engineer plans to study before connecting portions of the City sewer to the North Suburban Sanitary Sever. The City Engineer stated that this study to held up by negotiations with Columbia Heights. He stated that Columbia Heights offered sanitary sever capacity to Fridley, but during discussions with Columbia Heights it appreared that Columbia Heights did not have any capacity to sell. He stated that it would saves money to use some of the sewer capacity of Columbia Heights rather than connecting to the North Suburban Sanitary Steer District. The City Engineer stated that connections with the Sanitary Setter District will relieve the sanitary sewer backup Considerably. Co ellman Wright asked the City Engineer whether it is correct that he does not 'know at this time which districts will be served by the Columbia Heights sewer. The City Engineer answered that this is correct and the City has found that it will be necessary to connect to other sanitary sever lines In 1967. The City Engineer stated that making connections to the North Suburban Sauite y Sewer now would cost. $100 per connection, whereas, making the connections in two years would cost $200 per connection. The City Engineer stated that if the City of Fridley can discharge sanitary sewer to lines other than the N.S.S.S,D. lines, the City will save part of the cost of Usposing of sewage. Notion by Thompson to table consideration of the Resolution ordering improvement, approval of final plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids of Sanitary Sever Project #76, and to authorize the City Engineer and the Consulting Engineer to study the problem and report to the Council after the City has more adequate information and has explored the problem together with Columbia Heights. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PROPOSED AMOM TO CHAPTER 56 SIGNS aMLED 8 16 65 0 Councilman Tyson stated that he believes the Chamber of Commerce needs more 18 time to review this proposed ordinance. He stated that the Chamber of Commerce is sending copies of the Ordinance to its members. PAGE 7 Notion by Kirkham to table to the regular Council Meeting of October 4, 1965 • consideration of the proposed Ordinance amending Chapter 56. Seconded by �hampsoa. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • F �NCA3SE OBDINANCB - MBICAN OTL COMPANY fTABIM 9/7/65)_: The City Attorney stated that he wished to point out that there is no precedent for charging a fee for the location of a pipeline within a municipality. He stated that he discussed the question of a fee with attorneys of the American Oil Company in the City of Minneapolis and also with attorneys in the Chicago office of the American Oil Company. He stated that these attorneys said Amricam Oil Coy does not pay a fee to any other mnicipality for the locations of pipelines. The City Attorney stated further that the agreement includes a provision that American Oil Company will move the pipeline at any time to :cc to City *sods at, the expense of the American Oil Company. The City Attorney stated that the American Oil Company has not received a copy of the proposed franchise as of this date, but that he will send a copy to the American Oil Company after it is accepted upon first reading. Notion by Wright to accept the franchise ordinance with-the American Oil Company upon first reading, to grant a franchise to the American Oil C gNmv for use of certain designated City streets, to set the date for a Public Hearing of the ordinance on October 18, 1965 and publish notice for same., Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a roll call vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. The City Engineer stated that the American Oil C=Wany has submitted plans to the City of Fridley for relocation of the pipeline. The City Engineer shared this =V to the Council. He stated that the map was dream in cooperation with the office of the City Engineer and that the City showed the American Oil Company where to locate the pipeline in order to best suit the plans of the City. Be stated that, in general, the pipelines stay three feet to five feet from the nearest gas main. Councib mn Wright asked whether construction of the pipelines will result in storage of debris an boulevards. The City Engineer answered that very little debris will be stared an the boulevards: since construction of the pipeline requires a very small trench. He stated that the American Oil Company has agreed to repair damages resulting from construction. The City Engineer stated the Minnesota Hi&way Department is urging the American Oil Company to begin construction to relocate the pipeline immediately. The City Engineer asked the City Attorney whether a letter of intent from the Council to the American Oil Company to adopt the franchise agreement and give the American Oil Company permission to begin construction immediately would be sufficient for the American oil Company. The City Attorney stated that the Council could authorize the American Oil Company to begin construction. Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney whether such a letter would prejudice negotiations between the City and the American Oil Company. The City Attorney • answered, "No". Motion by Wright that the City Council authorise the Administration to give the American Oil Company a letter of Intent to accept the franchise agreement and permission to begin construction of the relocated pipeline immediately. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there ba2lug no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PA(Z 8 • YYY YYV.rfev► �r N►/7 Mv V1a.6i►■ M>•�N ►■■■.M1i� ► l'►r a►► w _ AND T.H. #47)-. Mr. R. A. Rurpius was present at the Council Meeting representing the Mine® to Highway Department. Air. Karpius explained the terms of the proposed agrement to the.Council. He stated that the Minnesota Highway Department will install the traffic signal system. Columbia Heights will pay 25% of the cost of Lastalla- tion the City of Fridley will pay 25% and the Minnesota Highway Department will pay the :other 50% of the costs He stated that in addition the City of Tridley will pay a 67. fee for engineering design and inspection of the construction. �Bs stated,that Fridley will supply the electric power and the connection to the signal at its own cost. 2he Minnesota Highway Department will maintain and repair the signal except for relamping, cleaning and painting which will be done by the City of Fridley. Mr. ICurpius stated that he discussed this agreawnt with the City Manager of the City of Fridley and the City Manager approved the agre@ment. Mayor Nee asked why the City of Columbia Heights did not agree to maintain the signal. Mr. Rurpius answered that the City of Columbia Heights has a legal problem maintaining the eignsis since they are located in the City of Fridley. He stated that the boundary line between the City of Fridley sad the City of.Columbia 'Heights runs along what will be the east service road of TaH. #47, and the entire signal system will be located in the City of Fridley. The City Engineer sued the Council the plans of the proposed construction of the Minnesota Highway Department. • Mr. Rurpius explained the operation of the traffic signals. He stated that the amount of time the green light is on, on T.H. 047, will depend upon the flow of traffic on ToH. #47. He stated that these will be left turn lanes at the intersection, but no left turn arrows. He stated that left turn arrows could be added to the signals at a better date if it is found to be ne"asary. Air. Ruurpi4s stated that the signal plan includes a pedestrian push button for crossing T.S. #47. He stated that it is designed in accordance with the State Statute for a minims on time of 7 seconds and a mini== lldon°t walk" signal set for the minimm rate of 4 feet per second allowing 20 seconds for pedestrians to cross the intersection after the. "don ®t walk" signal is ono Councilman Wright asked whether the pedestrian stop switch will stop all traffic at the intersection. Mr. Kurpius answered, "NO. He stated that the traffic light will be green for cross traffic while the pedestrian stop signal is activated. Robert Hart and Dr. H. G. Gerritz were present at the Council Meeting representing School District #13. Mr. Hart stated that lack of a pedestrian crossing signal at T.H. #47 and 51st Avenue Northeast will forte students attending the Elementary School to cross T. H. #47 at either 49th Avenue N.B. or 53rd.Avenue N.E. He stated that the additional distance which the students walk will make the walking distance more than 3/4 of a mile, and it will be ;necessary for the school district to transport these students by bus. Dr. Gerritz stated that High School and -Jr. High School students will have to cross T.H. #47 as well as Elementary School students. • Councilman Wright asked Mr. Elsrpius whether be is correct in believing the Minnesota Highway Department has agreed to install signals at 53rd Avenge A.B. .if the traffic conditions are such that construction of signals at this PAGE 9 Intersection are warranted. Mr, Kurpiue answered, "Yes", Mayor Nee pointed . out that 49th Avenue N. E. is a State Aid street and it is for this reason that signals are being installed at 49th Avenue N.E. Mr. Kurpius stated that signals will also be installed at 40th Avenue N.E. and 44th Avenue N.E. Motion by Kirkham to adopt Resolution #168 -2965, and to authorise the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the agreement with the Minnesota Highway Department for the construction of traffic signals at the intersection of 49th Avenue N.E. with ToH. #47. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. COW IDBRASIO, N OF rT,r „FxC SIGNALS LT 51ST AVENUE NdRT�iST: Councilman Wright stated that he does not believe-the construction of traffic signals at 51st Avenue N.E. is independent of plans for traffic signals at 49th and.53rd Avenues N. E. Councilman Wright stated that the Minnesota Highway'Department has long planned for the installation of traffic signals every four blocks along T.H. #47. He stated that these plans were made as a result of studies of traffic flow under the conditions of the most traffic and the least traffic on T.H. #47. Councilman Wright stated that he believes it would violate good design to eliminate the traffic signals at 49th Avenue N.E. and install them at Slot Avenue Northeast. Mr. Kasrpius stated that he discussed construction of the traffic signal with Mayor Nee, Dr. Gerritta,.Hrq hart, and Mr. Nelson, superintendent of the school in Columbia Heights. Mr. KUrpiva stated that the Minnesota Highway Department • agreed to maize counts of the pedestrian traffic at Slot Avenue N.E. and complete the study as soon as good weather is available so the load of. students crossing the intereeection will be normal. Dr. Gerritz stated that overhead pedestrian walkways might be installed at.Slst Avenue N.E. He stated that 138 elementary school students cross this intersection every day. Be stated that there are other reasons for pedestrians to cross the inter- section at 51st Avenue N.E.. He stated that the streets vest of T.H. #47 funnel the traffic onto 51st Avenue N.E., and Jr. and Sr. High School students will probably be using this intersection as well. Dr. Gerritz stated, further, that when people have a choice of crossing an intersection at grade level or by means of an overhead walkways they will cross it at grade level unless a fence is installed forcing them to cross the intersection on the overhead bridge. Councilman Wright asked Dr. Gerritz whether, if the traffic signals on Slot Avenue N.E. were not installed, the school -could enforce a different walking pattern upon the elementary students by weans of school patrol. Dr. Gerritz stated that he does not believe this would be workable. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Kurpius whether there would he a vehicular crossing of traffic at 51st Avenue N.E. Mr. Kurpius answered that a boulevard will prevent vehicles from crossing T.H. #47.,at Slot Avenue N.E. Mayor Nee asked whether there will be a pedestrian crossing at Slot Avenue N.H. and T. 8.447 even though there to no vehicular crossing. Mr. Xurplus answered that there will be & pedestrian crossing at 51st Avenue N.E. Mr. Hart stated that the school district will appreciate it if the City and the Minnesota Highway Department advise the school district of progress made concerning negotiations for traffic • signals -at Slot Avenue N.E. Mr. Kurpius stated that the Minnesota Highway Department will submit copies of the traffic study,,at 51st Avenue N.E. to the City of Columbia Heights, the City of Fridley, and school district 13. PAGH 10 Mr, Kurpius stated that the contract for construction of traffic signals at • 49th Avenue N.E., 44th Avenue N „E., 40th Avenue N.E. will be let this year but construction will not begin until the following spring. He stated that construction of the traffic signals at 51st Avecacme N.E.'could be included with the contract for construction beginning in the spring. Councilmen Wright asked Mr. Kurpius whether this would all (ne the Minnesota Highway Department the greater part of one year to complete the traigie study at Slat Avenue N.E. Mr. Kurpius answered, "Yee ". Mr. Kurpius stated that the Minnesota Highway Department appreciates having the advice of the aebool district. Mr, Hart asked Mr. Kwspius whether construction of the Storm Sewer Project #12 will interrupt the traffic flow on T.H. 7, and whether this construction will affect the traffic flow at Slat Avenue N,E. Mr. Xarpius stated that there is no major storm sewer work along the right -of -way of T.B. #47 which will affect the traffic flow during the cleat year. He stated that construction will not affect the traffic flog at 51st Aveme N.S. Councilman Kirkham a eked .Mr. Ksarpius whether the right-of-way of T. H. #47 will be fenced. Mr. Kurpivas answered, "No." :.I, 1!0 =4 t GOLDEN VALLEY GABDEN CLUB: DONATION Notion by Wright to receive the letter from Mrs. William Barger of the Golden Valley Garden Club, to receive the donation from the Golden Valley Garden • Club, to deposit the check upon the account. of the Parks and Recreation Department and request the Administration to send Mrs. - William Burger and' the Golden Valley Garden Club a letter of appreciation for the donation. Secoaded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. SACBSD HEART CHMtCH: ASSESS OM Mr. Ward Gronfield and Vt. Brunie Smoke, were present at the Council Meeting. Mr.,Gronfield stated that the Church of the Sacred Beart of Jesus owned the cemetery property for more than 50 years. He stated that the first person was interred in this cemetery in 1914. Mr. Gronfield stated that he doubts the legality of assessing a cemetery for the construction of server and water services. He stated that he believes the assessment in the amount of $1,540 is excessive. Mr. Gronfield stated that there is a small chapel in the cemetery, but there are no water or sanitary sewer.counections or sanitary sever facilities in the chapel. Mr. Gronfield stated that the cemetery is on high ground. and drains toward T.S. #100. He stated that the cemetery does not obtain any special benefits from construction of sanitary sever, *tors sewer, or water services. Mr. Gronfield stated that the location and the number of graves in the cemetery preclude the possibility that there will be any building upon the cemetery grounds. Mr.' Gronfield stated that the cemetery owners have been contacted by the City to obtain an additional 30 foot easement for construction of a street. Mr. • Gronfield stated that there is a.grave upon this easement which was dug In 1914. He stated that there is also a retaining.vall built of concrete slabs on this easement. Mr. Gronfield stated that the Cemetery Association is willing to donate the easement-to the City of Pridley under certain conditions Including the condition that the.City drop all assessments against the cemetery property for construction of sanitary, ,Morn server and water services, that the City will at its own expense relocate the cemetery fence for the benefit of PAGE 11 the cemetery and that the City will build a proper retaining wall for the • benefit of the cemetery, Mr. Gronfield stated that the church will obtain the consent of the heirs to relocate the grave upon the easement desired'by the City. Mr. Gronfield stated that if the City needs an easement to effect the alignment of 5th Street, the Cemetery Association will give the City an easement along one corner of the property to build a curve on 5th Street in exchange for construction of a proper retaining wall along this easement at City expense. Mr. Gronfield stayed that the cemetery does not benefit by the eonstructim of improvements along cemetery land. Ywyor Nee asked whether the land in the cemetery was given to the Cemetery Association or to owners of cemetery* lots by a perpetual dedication title. Mr. Gronfield answered, "No". He stated that the land of the cemetery was given to the Church of the Sacred Heart of Jesus for a different purpose. He stated that courts have ruled in similar cases that the City can be e4topped from making a claim upon cemetery grounds. He stated that the cemetery has been used for years and location of the graves makes other rases impossible. W. Gronfield stated, further; that there are 250 lots on the easement which the City has asked the church to sell. Mayor Nee asked whether a purchaser of cemetery land receives.perpetual title to the land. Mr. Gronfield answered, "No", but he stated that once a body has been interred in the cemetery it will retrain there unless it is moved with the consent of the heirs. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Gronfield how =any persons are interred in the cemetery at the present time. Mr. Gronfield answered, "Approximtely 200." Councilman Wright asked Mr. Gronfield whether the Cemetery Association plans to fill the land in the cemetery and landscape it, to improve the appearance. Mr. Smoka answered that the church has plans to landscape and improve the appearance of the cemetery and will do so as finances permit. Councilmen, Wright asked whether an assessment abatement would help the cemetery to effect landscaping of the land. 'Mr. Smoka answered that he believes this would help the church improve the cemetery. Motion by Thompson to receive the communication from the Sacred Heart of Jesus Catholic Church concerning the cemetery, to refer it to the Administration for proper evaluation, and an explanation of the legal, financial and engineering ratifications involved, and request the Administration to report concerning same at the next regular Council Meeting on October 4, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. SNGII t=G DEPARVENTs GO MAIN INSTAMTION Councilman Wright asked the City Engineer whether it is normal City policy to allow for the construction of gas rains in City streets before other services are installed. The City Engineer answered that the City does not normally allow construction of gas mains without prior installation of sewer and water services. The City Engineer stated that trenches for serer and water services are deep cuts, whereas, gas mains are installed in shallow trench&, and it is necessary for the City to protect gas lines during construction of sewer and water services. He stated that this adds-to the cost of construction of sewer and water services. iCotmeilmsa Wright asked the City Engineer whether the Gas Company Wald normally indemnify the City for damages to gas mains. The City Engineer answered that normally the Gas Company inspects the construction of the City to insure protec- tion of the gas mains and requests piling and other coverings to protect the gas mains during ecmutruction. PAGE 12 Councilman Wright asked whether the Gas Company pays for damages to the gas . uslu rben the City repairs sewer and water mains. The City Engineer stated that the Gas company repairs damages to its swains at its own expense. Councilman Wright asked whether the City can obtain an agreement with the Gas Ccspany to repair this gas line at its own expense. The City Engineer answered that the City has a franchise agreement with the Gas Company for repairs to gas lines by the Gas Company at its vtaa expense as required as a result of construction of repairs to City sewer and mater services. 'Council- am Wright stated that it is to the benefit of the Gas Company to obtain an agtoament with the City for.the construction of these gas mains at this time and since it is to the benefit of the Gas Company, the City should +obtain an agrssment with the Gas Company for tbe* repair of these services at the expense of the Gas Company. Mayor Nee asked whether it is legal for the City to season the higher cost of construction of sever and water services, which would be brought about by the necessity of protecting the gas mal q during the construction of these services, against the properties benefiting by the construction of the sewer and water services. The City Engineer answered that he believes this would be an equitable assessment. Mayor Nee asked whether the gas line is being installed for.the benefit of the industry locating along the railroad tracks rather than.people along the street who would have to pay the greater expense for construction of sever and water services. The City Engineer replied that this is correct. The City Attorney stated that it would be better to obtain an agreement with the Gas Company for the Gas Company to relocate the gas mains when the City Installs sever and water services. He stated that the City can order the Gas Company to relocate when the City needs to do so under terms of a prior agreement and the Gas Company will pay the cost of relocation. Councilman Wright asked the City Attorney whether this includes temporary relocation of the gas manna during construction of other services and whether relocation could wean shoring of trenches near the gas mains during construction. The City Attorney answered, 01Yen." Motion by Thompson to receive the communication from the Engineering Department, to refer it to the Administration, the City Engineer, and the City Attorney for study and to request the City Attorney to draft a proposed agreement which will protect the City interests for the construction of sever and water services and improvement of the right -of -way. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the ::motion carried unanimously. MIDLAND g fflsULTANTSs CMKGKGR Councilman Wright asked whether proposed construction of the N.S.S.S.D. rosin has been reviewed by the City Engineer or the City Consulting Engineer. The City Engineer replied that the City has reviewed these plans before. He stated, further, that the plans call for crossing Central Avenue which is a County road and the problem is one for the County and not for the City ofFridley. • Motion by Wright that the Council authorise completion of the authorisations permit and instruct the Mayor and the Manager to sign the authorisation permit PACE 13 • for the N,S.S.S.D. construction`-to cross Central Avenue. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. CITY wan ms- b AVENUE NORTHEAST The City Engineer stated that if the cemetery. land was given to the City free, the City would still have the cost of construction of a retaining wall'and fence. Be stated that if the street is improved, he, believes the street construction should be assessed against the cemetery. He stated that if the ehurch objects to this plan and requires the City to purchase the easement, the purchase cost would increase the cost of the construction upon the right - of-way which cost would be assessed against the church. The City Engineer showed a map of the proposed- construction and explained it to the Council. There was a discussion of the Bright -of -way, the traffic upon the street, and construction of apartment buildings in the neighborhood. Mayor Nee stated that he believes paving the street will benefit the cemetery and that construe- tion of sewer and water services also benefit the cemetery. Mayor Nee stated that he also believes that the cost of paving the street can be assessed against the cemetery property. Councilman Thompson stated that he requests the � Administration to report concerning construction of the improvements on *h Avenue N.E. and include the report with -the report of the Administration to the Council concerning the sauitery sewer, vateT and storm sewer assesommt and acquisition of the easement, for street constructionn along the caret �i Motion by Wright to receive the letter from the City EngWho Department regarding the construction of the street Improvement on Avenue NX. and • refer same to the Ad dnistration for recommendations concerning the Legal and engineering problems of constructing the i:aprovement. Seconded by Thompson. upon a voice vote, these being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Wright that the Council adopt a policy concerning the present project of storm sewer construction and street improvement in the vicinity of 54�h Avenue between 5th Street and 7th Street in accord with the proposal made by the engineering department. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mro Ward Gronfleld asked'whethez this motion affects the cemetery in any way. Mayor Nee answered that it affects the cemetery only indirectly. SUBURBAN ENGUMEEING SS#77 Councilman Thompson stated that the principle substance of this letter is that engineers maintain a high attitutde of courtesy and respect for one of their own members and will not undercut each other in design work. Councilman _ Thompson stated that Robert Minder's letter Included another suggestion which the City should study, The City Engineer showed a map to the Council and explained that the Council could install part of the storm sewer system proposed by Comstock and Davis and that construction could be made in this manner in any storm sewer project. He stated that construction of part of the storm sewer system will help to alleviate the problem~. • Coancilmm Wright stated that it is only sensible to divide construction of. the storm ewer system at certain points. He stated that the Council needs data to show where construction of the system should be divided. Comcilman Wright asked what is the cost of construction of varioue parts of She storm PAGE 14 . rawer system. Mr. Comstock answered that it is up to the discretion of the Council how much of the storm sewer system should be constructed'at the present tae. He stated that any part of the storm sarser system could be constructed and the rest added wren the street was isaproved in the future. Mayor Nee asked whether if-the stoma sewer were constructed in parts it would be necessary to spread the assessments for the construction each time part of It was constructed. Councilman Wright suggested that the City adoptthe policy that the district will pay for the assessment of any and all parts of the construction as each stage of construction is completed. He stated that he believes It is correct that each phase of construuction benefits the district. Mr. Cowtock stated that one factor to be considered in the construction of the storm sewer is whether the County plans to JMrove the drainage on Mississippi Street. He stated that he would suggest that the outlet line for the storm seater on Mississippi Street be sue dawn 7th Street and drain into this storm sewer system. Be stated that the also of the outlet will be uukaowu until an agreement with the County is made concerning storm sewer facilities on Mississippi Street. Mr. Comstock stated that there are varies methods whereby the City could share construction of the storm seater outlet with the County. Councilman Thoup+son asked Mac. Comstock vhen it will be possible for the City to have information concerning the County plans and when it would be possible for the City to make an agreement with the County for construction of the storm sewer. Mr. Comstock stated that he is discussing construction of the storm sower with the County at the present time and he believes it would be possible to write an agreement with the County in a couple of weeks. The City Engineer stated that the storm sewer old not be built until the following spring and the Coeurnell could delay consideration of the construction project. Motion by Kirkham to table consideration of SS #77 until agreement has been made with the County for atom sear construction along Mississippi Street, to instruct the Aeration to .trite an agreement with the County for sharing the cost of construction and present it to the Council. Seconded by Wright. Upon a -voice vote, there being no nays, the motion. carried unanimously. CITY ENGINEER: SS #12 Ice City Engineer showed a map of the proposed construction to the Council and explained the problem to the Council. He stated that he wishes to obtain a :nation from the Council acknowledging that the City. Vttends to extend - construction for storm saver project SS#'12 up Roman Road to Panorama Avenue, ffid approving construction of same. The City Engineer stated that he needs this information to decide vbather to construct this line at this time or plan for construction at a future time. Councilman Wright asked whether if the water from Main Street were to be diverted from running into Powramm theta is any plan to pick up the atoraa sewer water . at 435th Avenue. The City Engineer answered that it is feasible to run the storm sever water on Main Street into the outfall of T.H. #100. He stated that this would result in a cost of ;10 per hundred square feet, and such cost is relatively great. Councilman Wright asked "bother the design has proceeded to the point where it is possible to determine whom much cost will be added to construction of a storm sewer on Main Street if the drainage of Maui Street is ran into the 49th Avenue outf all rather than the T. H. :P1Q0 outfall.. Ift. Comstock answered that the design of the 49th Avemm autfali is based on the number of cubic feet per PAGE 15 second of flow. He stated that the capacity of this outfall cannot be • increased. Mere was a discussion of the drainage district and the asseenment district. Mr. Comstock stated that the City of Columbia Heights insists that a nap of the drainage district be included in the agreement for construction of SS#12. The City Engineer stated that when the assessment hearing for SS #12 Is held and the people object to assest3umt for this construction,-the City Administration should have answers for these people shy this part of the line was constructed against their: objections. Notioin by Kirkham to receive and file tho letter of the City Engineer concerning the extension of Storm Suer Project #12 to the intersection of Ronan Road and Panorama Avenue. Seconded by ThaVeoxn. Upon a voice vote, there being no mays, the motion carried unanimously. BMILING BOARD =TING MINUTES - SEPTEHM 8. 1965: The City Engineer stated that Mr. Hawrysh showed the Council plans for construction of the 32 unit apartment building at the previous Council Meeting. Notion by Wright to approve the plans for construction of the 32 unit apartment building with the exception of plans to drain the parking lot and site of the apartment building. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, these being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • BUTZDING PMWT Aff CA Old - GRAVES • SUNRAY DX SERVICE STATION - 5701 ITit AVMM T1 Mr. Ward Gronfield, Attorney for the Graves, was present at the Council Meeting. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Greafteld when the owners plan to begin construction of the station. Mr. Groafield answered that construction will not begin immediately but would begin in a few mvaths. There was a discussion of the access drives to the station and the drainage from the service station. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Gronfield whether he has drawings of the grading plan for the service station, Mr. Gronfield answered that the plans of the service station do not Include elevations but four grades are established on the plans. Councilman Wright discussed the adjust=mts for different traffic patterns which would have to be made In the design if construction of the service road for T.B. #47 were to be changed in the future and the effect of construction of a center line divider on 57th Avenue Northeast. Motion by Kirkham to grant the request of Clarence and Eugene Graves for a Building Permit for construction of a Stmray M Service Station at 5701 University Avenue Northeast with provision that the property owners comply with the recommen dationa of the Safety Committee for traffic pattern and drainage. Seconded by Wright, Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. !ETY CmaTTEE MINUTES r SLR 9. 1965-. • The City Engineer stated that there is not enough money In the 1965 budget to install and put into operation the traffic signals mowed from the location of 61st Avenue N.E. and T.B. #+7 to 61st Avenue N.E, and 7th Street N.EO The City Engineer stated that conduit was installed below 7th Street for future connection PAGE 16 of the traffic signals. Councilman Wright asked whether it would be possible • for wiring to be installed in the conduit for construction of ordinary traffic signals at this intersections. Time City EnglueaT answered, "Yee." CmMellman Aright suggested that the traffic signal could be programed such that it would be fleshing red on 61st Avenue Northeast and actuating the pedestrian button would stop traffic ou 7th Street affecting a four -voy stop. He stated that such an operation of the signals would make a safer condition for pedestrians to cross 7th Street. Motion by Wright to receive the minutes of the Fridley Safety Committee Meeting of September 9, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham& Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. U AM G C SSSICO HMTMG MINUTE$ - SEP7CMMER 9., 1965: , Councilman Wright stated that he discussed with ambers of the Planning Commission their recommendations for a Building Permit for construction of a Cashway Store on the northeast corner of Mississippi Street and T.H. #47. Councilman Wright stated that members of the Planning Commission made their recommendation upon thii,; am interpretation of zoning requirements in a C -1 district. Councilman Wright stated that he believes zoning in a C -1 district permits construction of a neighborhood store but not a store of 30,000.ssrauare feet. He stated that he does not believe this proposal was reviewed by the Building Board and the Safety Cow4ttee. Councilman Kirkham stated that unless plans for construction of the • Red Owl Stora have changed, the Building Board has reviewed them and recosmae:adad that approval be granted for construction of the Red Owl Store. Council mm Kirkham stated that Vir. 'Theisen asked for a Building Permit on the grounds' thaet the property was already massed commercially. He stated that application for a Building Permit was approved by the Building Board. Mayor Nee Stated that after the question concerning proper coning of this property is resolved, questions remain concerning access to the property. Council=m Wright stated that minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting show the Planning Commission has the misconception that the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority has authority over the design of the Reed Owl Store because of its proximity to the City Center project. Council== Wright stated that he believes the Planning Commission Failed to give adequate consideration to zoning the property for commercial developement and to traffic float to the property. Council Wright stated that he belleve6 that the proper development of Fridley vi.il be aided by having the Pied Owl Store develop a larger piece of property and build a more extensive store. Me believes the present site is inadequate. Councilman Wright stated that he believes the plans mitt be approved by the Building Board and the Safety Committee. He stated that the neighboring; residents do not wish to see this property developed for commercial. use, and the residents should be informed concerning this proposal. A visitor to the Council Meeting stated that he lives in the neighborhood of that proposed Red Owl Store, that he and his neighbors are interested in the e construction plans for this property and would like to be kept informed of these plana. Mayor Nee stated that Mr. Hodue did not feel that construction of a Red Out Store of this size is compatible with the zoning requirennutsm of a C -1 district. He stat.Gd that Ear. Hodas believes Who m- ding of the ardir -ranee describing requirematss for C -1 districts doss not give the Plaming G . i sssica sufficient Information. PAGE 17 He stated that there is a question of rezoning the property north of.the • proposed Red Owl Store,, Mayor New stated that there Is no other development to the City of Fridley where a food supermarket has located in a C -1 some. Be stated that all the other supermarkets in the City of Fridley are located In G-2 zones or industrial zones. Motion by Wright to refer the request of Mr. Theis*a for a Building Permit for construction of a Red ONl Store to the Building Board and the Safety Committee for review and recounandations. Seconded by Th© *sou. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the mmt#on carried unanfa=sly. 10 The City Engineer showed a plat of the proposed lot split to the Council and he stated that there is a question whether there should be a dedication of 12 feat of the lot for utilities. Mayor Ness asked what the area of the lots would be following the split. Mr. Cisewski was present at the Council Meeting and stated that the one lot would be 100 feet by 75 feet resulting in a lot of 7500 square feet, whereas, the code requires 9,000 square feet. The Mayor asked Mr. Cleawski whether he agrees with the recommendations of the Planning Caemission including the recommendation that 5 feet from lot 11 be added to lot 10. The Mayor stated that the City Engineer can draw an agreement between the City and Mr. Ciaewski for the lot split. Motion by Wright to approve Lot Split #65 -09 waiving the area requirement for the lots upon the condition that the owner dedicate the 25 foot easement along the north line of lot 10, dedicate the utility easement. if necessary, that the owner agree that 5 feet be taken from along the lot line of lot 11 and be added to lot 10 such that lot 10 is 100 feet long and lot 11 is 115 feet long. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unan1mouusly. STRUT PATTM: HAVES RIM LOTS - MOM COR`,.VRA1'2ON8 The City Engineer showed a map of the area to the Council and explained the action of the Planning Commission. The City Engineer stated that some of this property belongs to the school, the school wants to dedicate an easement around this property to the City and have the City build a street upon the easement in order that school children may be prevented from encountering hazards along the river bank. Councilman Wright explained the plans under discussion by the City for future construction of public access to the Mississippi Rivet and a. park in the neighborhood of Mr. Julkowski's property. He asked Mr. Julkowski whether the plans of the City would increase the value of his property sufficiently to msdte it possible for hits to construct high ride apartments upon this property of perbapo four or five stories. Mr. Julkowski answered that he does not believe the rental income from such property would be sufficient to provide for financing such construction. - Councilman Thompson suggested to Mr. Julkowski thatire" nave the City planning consultant examine his plans for the property in conjunction with plans for Park development in the neighborhood. He suggested that the City planning consultant could make recommendations to Mr. Julkowski which would enhance the value of bis property. Mayor Nm asked Mr. Julkmski whether if the City were to rezone the property i=esAng the capacity allowed for the number of PACE is apartment units on the site, would W. Julkowski build higher apartment r buildings with garages on the site. Mr. Julksysski answered that this depends upon whether he can obtain financing for the construction. Mr. Julkowski stated that rental rates are higher elsewhere in the Metropolitan area making construction of multi -story apartment buildings feasible but rents In the City of Fridley are too low to make such construction feasible. Councilmau Wright asked Mr. Julkowski if he discussed the financing of these apartment buildings in light of information concerning the improvement of the river front and a City park on the adjacent property. Mr. Julkowski anwored that he does not believe the plans would interest financerss since this development Is still being planned and its construction is several years off. Mr. Julkmski stated that he would rather work with a sure things, namely, conditions of the property at the present tinge. Councilman Wright asked whether it would be possible to dee; gn the property at the present time such that it could be improved and the buildings increased in nisi in the future if and vhaat the City coustructs a park and public access to the river. Mr.. Julkowtki anvvered that the bui.ldlugs could not be Increased in size to multi.- storied buildings in the future, but the grounds could be Improved to match Improvements contemplated by the City. Notion by Kirkham to concur with the recomandations of the Planning. Commission and approve the street dedication according to the plan dated September 7, 1965 of a 25 foot easaeua at along the east lime of Lot 3 for the extension of Anna Avenue: and a dedication of 25 feet along the north boundary of Lot 3 from the east edge to the River. Seconded by Thompson.. Upon a voice vote, there being had nays, the motion cwrried unanimously. 0 &ITCH DREDGING: 0 Mayor Nee asked Mr. Julkawskl whether he has dredged out the ditches that have been backing sap water end flooding neighboring property on Lynde Drive. Mr. Julkowski answered that he has made a contract for dredging the ditches, but construction to being delayed by poor weather.. He stated that he needs a backl�oe in order to dredge these ditches and will perform this work upon the property first. Mr. Julkawski stated that the consulting engineering firm of Comstock and Davis have staked the ditch and indicated cohere dredging should be done. Mayor Nee asked Vx. Julkowski: hov soon he will dig out the ditches. Mr. Julkovaki anwered that this depends upon the weather. Mayor Nee stated that every time it rains people are getting -water in their basements. The Council took uo action upon this matter. BGOD OF &M 3 MMTXNG IMMS SEPTENSER 15v 1965: Mr. Brunsell explained the action of the Board of Appeals to the Council. Mr. Heim was present at the Catssacil Hzeting and stated that no objectors attended the Board of Appeals Melting and notice of the meeting teas published in the newspaper. Mac. Hein stated that he knows his neighbors well, the neighbors PAGE 19 • said they do not object to granting the variance and they Would have attended the Board of Appeals Meeting if he had asked them to do so. Mr. Hein stated that if the streets upon the pride of his lot were blacktopped he would not have to build a garage in this location, but since the street is not Improved, he is celled to locate the garage according to the plans presented to the Council. The City Engineer stated that the City has a right -of -way for construction of a street along this property. Councilman Wright stated that he knows the street Is not maintained and suggested that perhaps the street could be built as a bicycle lane with provision for access by the fire depart - meut and an agreement with the property otmers to maintain the rest of the easement. Councilman Wright also noted that the street was included in the proposed street construction project for the pre,.4ous year but property owners objected to the construction, Mr. Reim stated that he believes a petition has been circulated to vacate 66th Avenue N.E. Motion by Wright to concur with recomma:dations of the Board of Appeals and approve waiver of the side yard requirement from 14.27 feet to 3 feet to permit construction of a detached garage upon, the property of Mr. Robert J. Rein on Lot 14, Block 1, Alice Addition. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. STBEET IMPROVEMENT - LIBERTY. LONGFELLOW AND ASHTON AVENUEt A visitor to the Council Ming stated that in the early part of 1965 he and his neighbors discussed with the Council the improvement of Longfellow, Liberty, Ashton Avenue and Ruth Circle. He stated that since the last petition was • circulated, new property owners made additional improvements upon the property. He asked the Council to hold a new hearing, for the improvement and suggested that possibly Liberty and Longfellow might be eliminated from the proposed improvement if the residents on these streets object to the improvement. He stated that he believes if residents along the streets knew they would be assessed equally with industrial property along the street, they would be agreeable to the improvement. The City Engineer stated that his office pre- pared a preliminary report for the construction and at the last hearing for this improvement, the Council agreed to delay consideration of the improvement for one year. Another visitor to the Council Meeting stated that he does not believe improvewnt of Ashton. Avenue benefits the home owner's. He stated that the Improvement benefits only industry located along the railroad tracks. He stated that how owners with corner, lots object to the improvement of Ashton Avenue for this reason. The visitor stated that he believes a re- evaluation of the assessments along Ashton Avenue to spread more of the cost of the assessments among the industrial property otmera could help to get the approval of residential property owners for this improvement. Mayor Nee asked whether Ashton Avenue could be designated a StateAid street. The City Engineer answered that Ashton Avenue is not now designated a State Aid street but the City could request that it be so designated. Mayor Nee asked whether the owners of the corner lots on Ashton Avenue would be willing to pay for the cost of improving the street to residential standards. The visitor • answered that he does not knm. Councilmen Wright stated that there is an Indirect benefit to the property owners for the improvement of Ashton Avenue in that it allows trucks serving the industries to move in and out of the area PACE 20 safely. He stated that it is not legal for the City to say that people an a opposite sides of the street benefit differently from construction of the same street. The visitor suggested that the street easement be located entirely on industrial land and built there so toe cost of the improvement could be assessed entirely against the industrial property. Councilman Kirkham stated that he recalled the principal opposition of the property aaners was to construction of a storm sewer, not construction of the street. The Visitor answered that property owners objected to the great cost of construction of the street and the cost of the storm sever added to the cost of street construction.made the improvement too expensive.. The visitor' stated that he and his neighbors would never drive on Ashton Avenue after construction of that street was completed. Mr. Wilbur Whitmore suggested, that street improvement costs be assessed against the industrial property for k of the street and the value of residential street construction be assessed against the residential property owners with the remaining costs assessed against the industrial property perner+s. Motion by Wright to request the Administration to review plans for improveoMt of streets in the area of Liberty, Longfellow and Ashton Avenue considering • new assessment base made by the addition of new parcels to the property and • proposed new design for the streets, to request the Administration to review these plans with the property owners and report to the Council. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • ALMCATVM FOtt SIGN PS&MIT - - MASY COOS y Miss Cooney was present at the Council Heating and explained to the Council the use of the lot where it is proposed to locate signs. She stated that the lot is too small for building and the best use she can find for the lot is leasing it for signs. She pointed out that the lot is located next to the Spartan store on a service road. Mayor Nee stated that he believes it would be alright to grants permit for construction of the signs since the property is zoned correctly for this purpose. He stated that the Council is considering the adoption of a sign ordinance which would require renewal of an annual permit and periodic inspection of the condition of the signs. He asked whether the builder of the signs would agree to waive his rights under a grandfather clause In the proposed ordinance. The City Attorney stated that he discussed the Inclusion of a grandfather clause in the sign ordinance with the Chamber of Commerce and that he could not find such a clause in the proposed ordinance. He said that the Chamber of Commerce believes there should be such a clause In the ordinance extending for some period of time to signs erected prior to a given date. Miss Cooney and James Bratland, representative of Breda, Inc., asked whether it would be possible to obtain a sign permit if they agree to build signs in conformance with the proposed ordinance. Councilman Wright asked what the construction of the signs will be. Mr. Bratland answered that the signs will be mounted on painted, steel poles and there will be no A•frame construction behind the signs. Motion by Wright to approve the request of Mary Cooney for construction of signs alongt'he service road at the southeast corner of T.R. #694 and T.R. #65 as shown on the plan presented to the Council conditioned upon compliance of the sign builder with the sign ordinance under consideration by the Chamber of Comoaerce and the Council. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unaniuwusiy. PAGZ 21 PURCRM PLAN rm ma FIBS RUCK: • Robert Hughes was present at the Council Meeting and stated that he wished to inform the Council, prior to press release, that the City Fire Department will be re -rated from Class 7 to Class 6., Robert Hughes stated that this classi- fication provides Fridley residents the same rates as Minneapolis. Be stated that the now rating will result in lower insurance costs to the residents in the City of Fridley. Mr. Hughes stated that industrial property and residential property is rated separately for fire protection. He stated that the new lower Lowrance rates will be effective to anyone renewing his Insurance policy after September 15, 1965. Mr. Hughes stated that the City, of Fridley obtained a new lover rating on the basis of the construction of the mater mains including the *Lace of the mains and the supply, inspection of_the mains, and compliance with codes. Mr. Hughes stated that the Fire Department may have trouble retaining the lover classification since one piece of Fire Department equipment newly the International Narvester 601 pumper does not meet the standard PerforWN%Ce test. He stated that the test on the 601 indicates that it has sufficient capability to be-used as a reserve'pumper, but that it does not produce a "sufficient volume of water flow at a-sufficient pressure to meet the test regairemento. Mr. Hashes stated further that the Fire Department plans to add ladders to the Seagraves pumper truck and convert it to a ladder truck rather than buying a ladder truck. He stated that when this is done, the City will not have credit for the use of a pumper since the use of the Seagraves truck as a ladder track will not make it possible to use the truck • as a pumper. Mr. Hughes stated that the City Manager informed him that the purchase of a pumper vas cat from the budget. Mr. Hughes stated that within five or six years it will also be necessary for the Fridley Fire Department to purchase an aerial ladder truck. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Hines how much time the City, has before it must purchase the pumper. Mr. Hughes stated that he believes the City can delay purchase of a pumper for one mare year, but that the City will have a problem in case of a structural fire where two pumpers are required and one pumper is used as a ladder truck. He stated that the International pumper is poor and sufficient only for residential fires. He stated that the City has obtained the present classification because of agreements for mutual aid when the reserve pumper must be used. Mr. Hughes stated further that it doesn't pay to fix the pumper since the cost of overhauling it would be greater than the benefits received. Councibuz Kirkham asked Mr. Hughes how much money the residents will save on fire Lowrance policies. Mr. Hughes stated that residents will save 5'i or more on fire Lowrance policies, that there may not be a reduction In the cost of fire insurance to residents of the City of Fridley since the cost of fire insurance will be increased throughout the State but the increase in the City of Fridley will not be as great as that in th'e rest of the State. The City Attorney asked what is the rating of the Columbia heights Fire Department. Mr. Hughes answered that Columbia Heights has a rating of class 6. • Mr. Hughes stated that other factors giving the class 6 ratings to the City of Fridley were the good response of the volunteer Fire Department, the Building Inspection Ordinances and Codes, the maintenance of the fire station sad the construction of the crater works. PAM 22 Councilman Wright stated that a quick calculation suggests that the first • payment on the pumper would be less than the savings of insurance costs and the 5% reduction in fire insurance to a typical property owner equals a reduction in tax levy of about I mill. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Hughes when the City would take possession of the pumper if the Administration Mould order one at this time. Mr. Hughes stated that the pumper would be delivered neat fall. He stated that approximately 2 mouths are required to draw the plans and specifications for the pumper and after the plans and specifications were drawn and approved and the order for the pumper was placed, another 6 to S months would pass before delivery since the pumper is a custom built truck. Mayor Nee stated that the City wants to Troy the pumper and asked whether the Firemen's Relief Association would finance purchase of. the pumper. Mr. Hughes, answered, "Yes." Mayor Nee asked vhether it would be possible to purchase a fire truck in 1966 even though. this purchase is not included in the budget. The City Attorney stated that it would be better to include the purchase in the City budget. Mayor Nee asked whether it would be financed, if it were purchased with a loan from the Firemen's Relief Association, in the same manner as by bond sales. The Attorney stated that it would not be necessary to take the same action as required to issue bonds but the purchase agreement could be drawn in the same manner as the loan obtained from the Firemen's Relief Association for construction of the fire station. Councilman Kirkham asked Mr.' Hughes whether the supplier and manufacturer of the fire truck would take an order for a fire truck at this time so the City would have swathing on record to show the fire underwriters in order to retain the class 6 rating. Mr. Kirkham Stated that in this case arrange - ments could be made for-the first payment an the pumper in Januarys 1967. Mr. Hughes stated this could be arranged, but if the cost of the pumper to the manufacturer increases before delivery of the pumper, the manufacturer could be expected to cheapen the pumper in order to most the increased costs. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Hughes whether it would be possible to buy a used pumper. Mr. Hughes answered that fire departments generally do not sell a used pumper but keep this equipment around for reserve use. He stated that it Mould be hard to ascertain the exact condition of a used pumper and repairs of same might be costly. Councilman Kirkham stated that if it would help to retain the class 6 insurance rating, he would like to see the order for the pumper placed now for delivery in January of 1967. Mr. Hughes stated that he does not believe it would be detrimental to order the pumper at this time. Mayor idee suggested that the Council could vote to authorize the Fire Department to draw plena and specifi- cations for the pumper and request the Administration to draw up a proposal for financing the purchase of a pumper such that the first payment upon the pumper would be mute in January, 1967. Notion by Wright to authorise the Fire DepartmaAt to draw plans and epecifi- .cations for the purchase of one pumper and request the Administration to prepare a proposal for financing the purchase of the pumper. Seconded by • Kirkham. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried umanimuously. M=Y MUSING AND RSDEM PNE NT AuTli0ltlTY IESTiNG MiNUTt;S - SEPMUM 1. 1965; Motion by Kirkham to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Housing and PAGE 23 Redevelopment Authority Meeting of September 1, 1965. Seconded by Wright. • Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. FBiDLEX HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES - SEPTOM 8 19650. Motion by Kirkham to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Bousing and Redeveloprnt Authority Meeting of September 8, 1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the ootios carried unanimously. HjMtFAC33G TENNIS COURTS - COMONS PARK QPENED NOON SEP 20 1965 • Mayor Nee stated that he discussed resurfacing the tennis courts with Paul Brown. Bs stated that Paul Brown informed him the present condition of the tennis courts is that a base is built on both the tennis courts but the mat is laid on only'half the tennis courts. He stated that this resurfacing would add a mat to the other half of the tennis courts. Councilman Kirkham asked the City Engineer whether he believes the price quoted for resurfacing the tennis courts is a good price. The City Engineer stated that it is a good price and $1,000 less than the budgeted amount for the improvement. Lotion by Wright to award the contract for resurfacing the tennis courts in Commons Park to the Northland Construction Company, 6320 Sunrise Drive, Fridley, Minnesota in the amount of $2,368.00. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • Councilman Wright stated that the Council previously tabled indefinitely construction of the tennis courts on Moore Lake Beach which are included in the budget for 1965. Be asked whether there are sufficient funds available for the City to coiplete construction of these tennis courts in 1965. The City Finance Director answered that sufficient funds are avail able for construction of the tennis courts. Mayor Nee atated that he discussed this same question with the City Manager and the City Manager informed his that it would not be necessary to delete construction of the tennis courts In order for the City to remain solvent in 1965. Councilman Wright stated that there is a limit to what the City can delete from the Parks and Recf►- ation program. He stated that the Jaycees made an investment in Moore Lake Beach for the construction of additional beach equipment and improvement of Moore Lake Beach has a high priority with the Parks and Recreation Department. Motion by Wright to reconsider tabling construction of tennis courts on Moore Lake Beach and request the Administration to place consideration of same upon the agenda of the regular Council Meeting of October 4, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham,, Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BUILDING PERMIT AND VARIANCE - 6050 - 5TH STWT NORTMKAST,_ BUSS Motion by Wright to grant the request of Mr. Buss for a Building Permit for construction of an attached garage and a waiver of the side yard requirement from five feat to three feet to permit construction of the same upon his property at 6050 - 5th Street 21-)rtheast. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BUILDING PERMIT AND VARIANCE - 6866 - 7TH STREET NORTHUZT - CARLSTEHI Motion by Kirkham to grant the request of Robert Carleton for a Building PAGE 24 Permit to rebuild his residence to its previous condition and grant the request • of Mr. Carleten for a waiver of the side yard requirement from five feet to four feet six inches. Seconded by Wright, Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. LUMING PERMIT - 600116005 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NCIRTHWT, MARCi l"AVA2 Motion by Wright to table to the regular Council Meeting of fttober 4, 1965 the application of Mr. Marchiafava for a Building Permit for the reconstruction of his property at 6001/6005 University Avenue N. E. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Notion by Wright to approve General and Public Utilities Claims #6363 through #6523. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote there being no nays the notion carried unanimously. Notion by Kirkham to approve Liquor Claims #7806 to 7856. Seconded by Wright. t*=- a voice vote, there being no uays, the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMAZ'BS: Motion by Wright to.approve and authorize payment of the following estimtes= " Well Drilling Co, 413 No, Lexington Parkway St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Estimate #6 - Water Improvement Project No. 75 -A (Partial) (Three additional Drift Wells) Jdmso:n Bros. Highway A Heavy Constructors, Inc. P.O. Box 1002 Litchfield, Minnesota Estimate #3 - Water Improvement Project No. 34 -0 (Partial) (Crossing.- T.S. #694 - Johnson Street, 7th Street) Barton Contracting Co. 10300 89th Avenue North Osseo, Minnesota Estimate #1 - Water Improvement Project No. 75 -F (Partial) (T, H, #47 Watermain relocation) F. D. Chapman Construction Co. and Readall- Berglin (a joint venture), 2809 Alabama Minneapolis, Minnesota $ 109130.85 $ 7,086.37 $ 7,778.94 Estimate #1 - Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 73 and Sanitary Sear, Water and Storm Sewer Isprovemennt Project No. 73-A (Partial) (54th 6 Innsbruck 5th Adds.) $ 8,294.58 PAGE 25 D.` W. Hat8tad Company; Inc. 7101 Higbway #65 N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Estimate, #1 - Tornado Damage • Fridley Fire Ball $ 169232,76 Estimte #1 - Construction for Civic Center $ 19874.11 Comstock & Davis, Inc. Caaseulting Engineers 1446 County Road "J" M meapolis, Minnesota 55432 For Besidrnt Inspection & Supervision for staking out of eonstrwtlon work ' Estimate #5 - Water lgwovement.Project No. 34-0 (Crossing - T.H. #694 - 3obaasan Street, 7th Street) $ 464.50 Estimate #10 - Water improvement Project No. 3" -2 CArap3ag.Installation and pumphouse - Well #6 - 600 $ 62nd Avenue Northeast) 42.50 Estimate #14 - Sanitary Seiner and Water Improvement Project No. 67 (1964 Sanitary Sewer and Water Prograo) $ 12.50 Estimate #6 - Water Improvement Project No. 75-A • ('free additional Drift Welts) $ 256.25 Estimate #9 - Sanitary Sewer and Water tmProvement Project No. 70 - (Riverview Terrace, south of Mississippi Place; Lincoln (Ashton) Street, South of Ironton Street;$ 62.50 5th Strut, South of T.H. #100),. Estimate #1 - Sanitary Sever, Water and Storm Sewer Impsovenment Project No. 73 -A (Innsbruck 5th Addition) $ 525.00 Estimate #4 -Water Uprovement Project No. 75-B T.S. #100) $ 116.25 (Booster Station - 63rd Avenue N.E. and Estimate #11 - Storm Sever Improvment Project No. $ 20.00 5 -B North of TdH. #100, East of T.B. #47) $etimate #1 - Storm Sever igwovemeat Project No. 73 (54th Averse Northeast) 10835.00 seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried 'unanimously. ESTIMAI'B Ol'" S CO $MiT.EY AND ASSOCLlTBS FOR IUZ G AND ON C0BT8 • Maya( flee asked the City Attorney whether the estimate of Mr. Smiley vss fog cnrreat enmWitares of Mhtthes it includes costs sPPlicat :A to the pr lLW- nary design of a separate pease of the project. 9be City Attorney stoted tLat PAGE 26 the costs cover current expenditures. Mr. Comstock stated that it is • standard practice for architects to charge costs for blueprinting and reproduction of specifications to their clients. Councilman Wright stated that he does not believe that Mr. Smiley would risk the reputation of his firm by submitting a phony bill shifting costa of one part of the project to another. Motion by Wright to request the City Manager to obtain an itemisation of the bill, and report to the Council at the next regular meeting on October 40 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. LICENSES: Motion by Kirkham to approve the following licenses: Mane Beating Company Route #3 Osseo, Minnesota by: C. R. Maus MW GENERAL H. & F. Construction Company 5529 Penn Avenue South • Minneapolis, Minnesota by: Herbert E. Garbers aT Swenson, Incorporated 5462 Jackson Street New Brighton, Minnesota by: H. J. Swenson Zachman Construction Company 3359 Central Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota by: James A. Zach men MW BEATING Avoles Plumbing & Heating Company 779 East 7th Street St. Paul, Minnesota by: A. Walter Avoles MW Maus, Heating Company Route #3 Osseo, Minnesota by: C. R. Haft Suburban Heating Company 2050 White Bear Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota bys PAYM004 Gbe®a lS;fi • Suburban Beating CompoW 2050 White Bear Avenue St. Paul, Minne"tae bys Rayanood Mama i PAGE 27 80MWG Al Jarvi Construction Company 6232 Parnell Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota by: Al Jarvi NSW Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motUn carried unsnimmely. Notion by Wright to receive Petition #25 - 1965 and refer it to the Administration for processing. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PlTIlZatd x`26 - 1965 FM SZ =T SIMFACOG ON 75TH WAY AND WAYS Motion by Wright to receive Petition #26 -1965 and refer it to the Adminis- tration for processing. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. APPltOPBI[4TIaN ORD=&= - I= RUDUG -- BUMT 19,96669 Motion by Wright to adopt the 1966 Budget Ordinance upon first reading as presented to the Council. Seconded by Kirkham. Motion by Kirkham to smand the budget by adding a sufficient amount to the budget of the police department to hire one policeman in Daly of 1966. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion to adopt the Ordinance upon first reading. Upon a voice vote, tbom bring no mays, the motion carried unanimously. ORDUMCB AMENDING CHUM 24 - PAW AND RECREATION 2%lWMI - .r��r r ■ rr��r. Msyor Nee stated that h* believes the ordinance is a good one. Councilman Wright stated that the version of the ordinance is completely satisfactory to the Parks and Playgrounds Sub - committee, the Recreation CoindAsion and. the City Manager. There we a discussion of the elimination of school board representation to the new commission. Councilman Wright stated that the Parks and Playgrounds Sub - Committee and the Recreation Commission vould_lik+e to have the Ordinance approved as it is with the Chaiszaan of the Parks and Recreation'Comudesion as a masher of the Planning Co mission. He stated that the Sub - Committee and the Comission Igo the proposal for five members and stated that they believe that most of the recreation business of the City would be referred to the Council through the City Manager and that representation an the Planning Commission would bring the business of the Parks and Recreation Committee affecting the Planning Commission to the Planning Commission in the usual manner. Motion by Wright to table to the regular Council Meeting of October 4, 1965 consideration of the Ordinance =ending Chapter 24. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PAGE 28 OQDnWCZ DESIGHATING CHUM 20 - UNDBI11 DISTBIBUTI09: • Motim by Kirkham to refer the proposed ordinance designating Chapter 20 - handbill distribution to Kasiler °s Stare, to Tki- County Publications,. to the Chamber of Commerce and to others in the industry for comment. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. OPIEMM TO AMEHD SECTION 77.01 - BEACH CLWINGa Motion by Wright to adopt the Ordinance amending Section 77.01 giving the Parks and Playgrounds, Sub-Comittee the authority to set beach closing hours, upon first reading. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no usys, the motion carried unaniaously. COS UN !Z QUOTAFOR TOEi1 M DUMP CTEAHUPa. The City Engineer passed out and discussed with the. Council quotations for cleaning up the dump of tornado debris. Councilmen Wright stated that the met of cleanup would be paid vitb Federal funds. Motion by Wright to award contract for cleanup of dump of tornado debris to Jbitan Mo Johnson and Ted Renollett, Contractors,-3638 Bolden Drive, -in the amount of $18,875.009 mad direct the bidder to provide a disposal location outolde the City of Fridley. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, them being . no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Wright to award a contract for sweeping streets in the tornado damaged area to Industry Services, Inc. of 1359 Dean Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota in the amount of $57.50 per curb mile. Seconded by Kirkhaom. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the,motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY • Ct1 MIA MIGMS AGffi IT - SS #12s 2he City Attorney stated that a supplemental agreement will be drawn between the City of Fridley, the City of Columbia Heights and the Minnesota Sigbway Department for'maintenance and repairs of the storm serer. He stated that this agreement will be drawn by the City Attorney of Columbia Heights. The City Attorney stated that the City Attorney of Columbia Heights is also drawing an agreement for deposit in escrow of funds from the sale-of bonds by the City of Columbia Heights for construetion'of Storm Sewer Project #12. The City Attorney stated that Mr. Comstock, Mr. Wagner and the City Attorney considered these agreements with the City of Columbia Heights, and he stated, further, that the agreement is basically in the same pattern as the usual agreement with the Minnesota Highway Department. He stated that the agreement does provide that a map delineating the drainage district be included as part of the agreement. Councilman Wright asked whether it would be possible to obtain changes in the map in the future. Mr. Coretack answered that the rap is not a principal part of the agreement with the Minnesota Highway Department, but that the agreement • with the Minnesota Highway Department was made on the basis of design triteria and, hence, the drainage district could not be changed in the future. Mr. Comstock stated that the supplemental agreement for maintenance and repair of the storm sewer will include a deeiga formula for drainage into the storm PAGE 29 sewer, a formula for computing the costs and the procedure for the City Bogineers of the City of Fridley and the City of Columbia Heights to follow when considering whether repair and maintenance should be done by City forces of the individual Cities or by contract with Council approval. Councilman Wright asked whether a sub - district Map would be drawn to show the respossibi"',ity for repairs. Mr. Comstock stated that responsibility for repairs will be decided on a contributing area basis and that inclusion of a sub - district map would complicate the agreement. The City Attorney.stated that the maintenance agreement is more specific than the general agreement. Mr, Comstock stated that an agreement is in existence between the Cities of Richfield, Bloomington, and the Minnesota Higbvay Department for the construction of a storm sewer project along T.H. "94...He stated that he rants to research this agreement and ask the o €ficials of Richfield and Bloomington for their experience concerning this agreement. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Comstock whether there is sufficient time for him to research the agreement betweeen Bloomington and Richfield and, considering their experience with the ,agreement, evaluate,the probable results of that written between Fridley and Columbia Heights. Mr. Comstock stated that the Minnesota Highway Department has delayed letting bids for construction until October 29th. He stated that Columbia Heights plans to let bids on October 4th,.the City of Fridley plans to let bids on October 11th and that the agreement should be dram and the plans okayed by the Council on October 18th. The City Attorney stated that the Consulting Engineer and the personnel of the City of Columbia Heights are continuing • work in the meantime upon the agreement to complete sankto Mayor Nee stated that he has studied the agreement and he approves of sass. He asked the City Attorney whether approval of the agreement at this time would jeopardize negotiations with the City of Columbia Heights. Mayor Nee stated that there would be no jeopardy except as it depends on the other party to approve the agreement-and that Columbia Heights may wish to change part of the agreement before approving same. Councilman Wright asked the City Attorney what is the Liabitity of the City of Fridley, if the City of Fridley finds it impossible to draw a supplemsntal agreement for repair of the storm sewer with the City of Columbia Heights. The City Attorney answered that he believes the liability of the City of Fridley would be negligible. The City Attorney stated that the Council will used to pass a resoln`tion referring to the supplementary agreement before the plans can be formally adopted on October 18th. Motion by Wright to approve the agreement between the City of Fridley and the City ofColumbia Heights for construction of storm sewer project #12 and authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to.sign the agreement subject to completion of the supplementary agreement for maintenance and repair of the storm sewer and subject to any last minute changes requested by the City of Columbia Heights. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the action carried unanimously. AUi`HORU G BIDS 12 REPLlCB CITY CAR; Notion by Kirkham to authorize advertisement for bids for the purchase of a compact car as described in the agenda. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 0 r1 L� PAGE 30 Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #169 -1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BgA.01 ON APPROMG M. It. D. AGRE MNT NO. 54803: The City Attorney stated that there is an error on page 152 of the agreement in that the agreement was,writum to be authorized and signed by the Mayor and the City Clerk, Whereas, it should be signed by the mayor and the City Manager. The City Engineer stated that there is no need to approve this Resolution at this time, and that plans of the project are not complete. Notion by Wright to table for redraft the Resolution approving the Agreement #54803 with the Minnesota Highway Department. Seconded .by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. t .AFFIRMMG E101 NO. � 144-1965; Notion by Kirkham to table to the regular Council Meeting of October 4, 1965 re- affirming Resolution #144 -1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Caftellman Wright stated that he believes the City should undertake to condemn and order repair of these structures whether there is an Urban Renewal program In the City of Fridley or not. The City Attorney suggested that item #11 be changed to require that the remedy for weeds on the property be changed from sodding the lam to improving the lawn area. Councilman Wright questioned whether the inspection department actually inspected the properties an the dates given in'the resolution and he stated that it would seem strange to him that the Building Inspectors would have inspected all four of the duplexes at August 24th. Notion by.Wright to adopt Resolution # 170 -1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays,, the notion carried unanimously. Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #171 -1965 with an amendment of the wording that necessary repairs listed in item 11 be changed to "Drove the lawn area." Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. THE REPAIR OR RBMOVAL OF THE Notion by Wright to adopt Resolution #172 -1965 with the amendment of its #11 that the necessary repairs be changed from "Sod the lame properly" to "improve PAGE 31 the laws urea ". Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no [says, the motion carried unaptly. Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #173 -1965 with an amendment of the necessary repairs of item 11 from "Sod the lawns properly" to "Improve the lom area." Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the action carried unanimously. ASSESSMENTS ON LOT 2, PARCEL 10002 and LOT 3, PARCEL 1400, AUAITORIS Motion by Kirkham to adopt Resolution #I-A/- -1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a ma voice vote, there being no nays, the oti n carried unanimously. Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #175 -1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no Days, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: • There being no further business, MAyor Nee declared the regular Council M"ting of September 20, 1955 adjourned at 1 :45 A.M. Respectfully submitted, �0n 4f 4 pom>nd B. Bade Secretary to the Council .41 14,'UJC9T NO. 58 -W, Kot,lee ia lvereby TIven 11"hail'o thvU CcuncJLI 0--f t"hie City o- Frri4iley will meet at the city 11*,11 in sal-Ld on -Whe 2,4rd of 1965A, at 8*.00 P,,MQ to ltwir and ?ass uper, all object-,.onz, -,f �ny,� to tl-.ts proposed assessments ,Lr respact t) the follo-jl.,ag 6 "Tole X W,-,TER AND S-01TARY �SEWER 114A1?K)VEv-E1T-, PR,u ECT 140. 158 The Proposed assessment roll for each of' said improva.23ilts is now ors file and or,*n to pvblie ixwpectian by a-13, parts-ons interostad,, in the office of tj,-Ae Clerk ol! said City,, At said he-,ring,, the Co-u=il will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvenment3o The general nature, of the Improvements and each of them is the construction of sanitary sewer and stoma sewer mains and connecting lines and water rains and cennnaction lines in the lands and streets designated in manner as follovims 1. Cant al Avenue from Woody Lane to Mississippi Street N.E. IF- L-1 The P-rea proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by- said improvements oi- each of them wid abutting on or lying adjacent to the above named Stre-et. Said improvements will h-3 assessed against the. proparties vithii,*i the abcme noted areas in whole or in part, proportionately to eReh of Vie laneq therein 0outained according to the be-aefits ratxA,ved. The total, cost ol" tho !.mprovement is estimated at $249798.25, DATED THIS 2nd DAY CF AUGUSTx 1965, BY ORDEER OF THE C117 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. Pabliahs The Record — Fridley Edition August 1965 At%ust 1 R 1965 0 MAYOR — William J. Nee CITY 14ANAGER - Earl P. Waoier L'IR klu� citl� tit %-I Rntl C '.'Y `V Y !,465, at 8800 P,M, t* f °; me 11 t F, ltf ras= 96S '31? AND SEIVISR mt,;Ii camc ONS NOT Hr�RETX)FOR�; P'(y*PXjSH%ID �JID !OT&11,ABX2 I pl-t •ed ants -P -ich of z4aid improvements is now On file rxs:n der. -�azmrt, rotl tat e, i-0 r,�Ublijc, inspactii-m by al'! tlmmnf!- knterested,, in the office of the a�aUI citvo At said. heariIrqf,,' IAM CoUnCII, tom&ider wr"Itten or oral objections to a,-, e4jch �f mid Nqnriwnm*-!-.r4tS. T*htj.� genuc.ral naturt of the f 1. hpwk is he CO 8 ajii sach o t n tr= ftmltift,hin?, of maj.6, t.,j, ap ^-Ormetivas and water xat*,rait and ae.f �Fir-m ('aamic-tion's to, and to t""je, properties as follaw� Lot, S LIO t 1 Part of lot 21, Var,.2UOO Parcel 11,h5-t h pt of Lot 20 Whitt Ike 10", of S 1,78" e, x , W 20' of W 75,,L Of JAot' 'I Lz t rs 3 a ad 4 V !00'1 of S 200" of hot 24 M Oc 6- 8 totA 1 & 2 Block 13 45 & 16 B110IC-1k %,I 20 81f�ek 4 Al I 'Lo t 8 111.t 'k 13 1,0 to 8 & 9 Black P S 1, *ck P Ko t Bloek P 33 & 3A Blocir "t. tsi I I 12 B1 00t R • C,,cts 0 16 B I oc k, R fete 3i 9 .�7 B I Oct It 8 Audlit"or"s Sub,: #59 .Auditorua Sub. 477 Audttat"a Sub., #77 AudLtor-g sub� #77 kuditot-& Sub� #92 Subdivision of Lot 10, AUd. Sub. #94 SuMi,trLsion of Lot 10, Aud. Sub,, P% Auditor"s Sub. 91.55 Aroo *.W Addition City View Addition Fridley Park Addition Fridley Park Addition Ramiltoul's Addition to Y*chavicsvillft Addition Hut Bt--r g A4ditkou %it Baug Addition Plymouth Addition Riverview Iii Lghts Addition Rivt,rvicn; Heights Addition j,j,vzrvjc-w 11.3 1 ghta Addition Riw,tvLev J%ights Addition R ALve rvi.sw He ight$ Addition i�<j.vervjew pg ights xddit' :--n Rfvervlk�v Ik,,, i ghts -AAdUlon p. C"� 4tw;z;.Y �: � .,.�. ""T 0 � t , .35 , 36 B`Loelt V Iota S & 9 Block W Lots 13 & 14 Block X Part of Lot I Block 1 iot: 3 Block 1 lot I Block I Ri,rte -rvtew Heights Addition Ri'-u r"e''.a4m ltiigrlut 3 Addition. of vervia° , Heights Addition Sylvan bills Plat 5 Sylvan Hills Plat 5 Sylvan Hills Flat 6 The area proposed to br- assessed for sAd improvements and each of them is all that land 'benefited by eaid imprave tits or each of them atkd is the same as those listed above Said improvements will be assess d agalkv t the properties within the above aotNrad areas in whole or in part proporttonateI7 to each of the lands t heezir tontai d according to the tae: f l is reesi d, OAWD THIS 7V DAY OF SEPTMMRR, 1965, BY ORDER OF TIT CITY COUNCIL • A S, T< CITY CI. K - Marvin C. Brunnellu� Publistc° The Record u Fridley Addition Sapteuber 15th and 22ad 1965 0 MAYOR - William Jv Nee 3A. • 3s- OFFICUL PnUCATION (EXHIBIT A) NOTICE OF NUKING ON WROVEMOM WATER. SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEM14MM P1d,QJECT NO. 73 +B WIMEAS, The City Council of the City of Fridley,, Anoka County,, Minnesota,, has deemed it necessary and expedient that the improvements hereinafter described be wade. NOW, TE WOPZ,, NVOTICE IS DME&VY Get THAT on the 4th day of October,, 19650 at 8;00 o'clock P.M.,, the City Council will meet at the City mall in said City,5 and will at said time,, and place., hear all parties interested in said improvements in whole or in part. The general nature of the Improvements is the construction (in the • lands and streets noted below) of the follawinb improvements,, to-wit CONSDUCTION ITEM A. Sanitary Sewer and Water Maius and Laterals and service connection. to To serve all lots in Don's 5th Addition. 2. East-West easement located approximately 250 feet south of Mississippi Place between East River Road and Riverview Terrace. 3. North side of Osborne. Road between East River Road and railroad tracks. B. Sturm Severer and Appurtenances 1. Don's 5th Addition. 2. Ely and Dover Streets in the 500 block. 3. Fridley Street between 66th Avenue and 67th Avenue. 4. Mississippi Place at RiveTviewr Terrace. ESTIMATED COST . . . . . u . . . . . . . . . . . u . • THAT THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR SAID 110MEMENT IS AS FOLLOWS Ishlbit "A" • For Construction kris. It L= A and B above ---- ------- --- - -- -- -- All of the land abutting upwa saaid streets named above and all lauds adjacent and abutting there All of said land to be .assessed proportionately according to the benefits received by such improvements. That the Council proposes to proceed with each of said impravemOnts as separate improvemants9 accept as hereafter otherwise pzovided by the Coil all under the follwing authority to-wit a Minnesota Law 19539 Chapter 398 and lws arendatory thereof, and in conformity with the City Chanter. DATED THXS MY OF o 1965 • ,ATTFST s CM CIS m Marvin Brunsell Publish • MAYOR - William Jo Nee �3G MMA= OF MINUTES OF METING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF A SPECIAL H=M' �. h= AUGUST 23b 19659 AT M0 O'CLOCK P.M.0 AT THE CITY HALL, CITY � OF FIUDLEY0 MBN%SOTA. Pursuant to due call and notice thoroof+ a speoial meeting of the City Council of the City of Fridlay, Minnosotai was duly held at .the City Hall in said City on Mondayp tile. 23rd day of August,, 196% at $too o'clock Pe-He The following members were preseutt BE IT BESCLV20 By the city Wnaix vd, '"he tlii�y- of Pridley, MWOMMUS 1. We Mt .j.ty cjcyjjc jja.,> .,jj1 h. the su,,tanwe of the engineers, horMfore aulacted by this KIM! for each parpaz�a� tiz PrVW amounts to A opoivikilAy Yt�r a-olrum sT�f4,m, MOM 1MMUMS PROJEOT NO. in i;4id Ci,.,y vslezzinin lot, piece or pzrcel of 11 .k.,nd in vith is at ;Aq W has prepared XA.jpj j� the city clerk *Nan,jeo After due 43hC,Wi11G tile uTC lmi�ll cv . � t; an�-, I enon NA qvvrg-y juq piano or .parcel of Wd' slypSovi vy-) J,*rjo ZMUOUIA OMIIAWIL'ted inaroducad the 11 GA W"V W MOWS An t Pjai rod by U9 that thia Council mt.rLAx reet S-n aeraion an thiv ISO awl Plus to pass an W) 3. Said prv,ma,!:,d time, nince Wo filing been open to Supeallai vmd Ale, A'irl Me STO g NOU L w. Yza at Mod perauns Q present WO, K BE IT BESCLV20 By the city Wnaix vd, '"he tlii�y- of Pridley, MWOMMUS 1. We Mt .j.ty cjcyjjc jja.,> .,jj1 h. the su,,tanwe of the engineers, horMfore aulacted by this KIM! for each parpaz�a� tiz PrVW amounts to A opoivikilAy Yt�r a-olrum sT�f4,m, MOM 1MMUMS PROJEOT NO. in i;4id Ci,.,y vslezzinin lot, piece or pzrcel of 11 .k.,nd in vith &he py.vZvj6=r at ;Aq W has prepared XA.jpj j� the city clerk *Nan,jeo whabcnenba In dc 43hC,Wi11G tile A enon NA qvvrg-y juq piano or .parcel of Wd' slypSovi vy-) J,*rjo ZMUOUIA OMIIAWIL'ted against the Wama'' ?r, �,Wtiee lboen jmhjjahe6 An t Pjai rod by U9 that thia Council mt.rLAx reet S-n aeraion an thiv ISO awl Plus to pass an W) 3. Said prv,ma,!:,d time, nince Wo filing been open to Supeallai vmd and A'irl Me STO g NOU L w. Yza at Mod perauns Q present WO, m , Wei AM) excaP 0 58 1 'tie -0 -an" S ;j? e ch."1I: gad .1.31.,1.s Council 1.�nels l��'i.f '•_'� Gt:�.4Ji p�.6c88 or p�.:�i��g of Und onnntvnarat,ncl in .ea phi ro;sj c6� 3 : -mend as altered zd rrodifted was &M bc°:IFX_ii;cd by the STO M SZI E 9 t'.IX2t,5t :I.M1, STULIRi, DTI''F'AVmaw PROJi'2 N0, 58. in Who rmolamb in praposeal s s oassment r� l'12 in the anroiznt set rklposMta the desc:rapt -4an of rich such I.ot,, piece or parcal of a �tnd, Ord �hrw�� said an4oun;u so set out is hereby levied against st each of the rr apecti-vre lots, pieces or parcels of land therein descrlbed o 6o S,sch, propo; ^: J ao assure ��t . n s altered, modified sand corrected is, aff3 rinned, a lopted and car lPln1 od, and the curs fixed mid n ained in zz.- CI proiposed as.-, ssrenU •Cra3 altered,, 'modified and cor>~ectcI, the c.rg y 4xd ;Jr<z'c3.oh heroin abcrFa mad cl, are af'?�:f.nned, daC erpi od �17.d' Cobfir-3ed as she pY'OpQS 011Cwial a- j- M;nient for each 01 scij* *Iotsr pie -ces or parcels (o S 1d as�,3(,_w ere p so a � dra G�i:J edop t Fitt` aid ccnfixved shall be certified to by i;he: City- Clork aa',d �.� in his office and &02a 1 there-upon be 4xd the special assessment for STORM S19INTIM, ZtigAT M AND S€ITEP11W SEirMI I3 PROVEI-15 2 PROJECT 110. 58, 80 Tlie smout Us assesned agaf uxb each lot, piece or parcel of land shall bear >•aq) v from the dato hereof until the some have - been paid at the rate of six per cciint (6%) per annum. 9. Such aoswsm ant o1hali be payable in oneror twenty ax ut-a insvan -ants payable on the & :� y of Janueajr Li each yeax ,, b©glmiLng in the yr;,ar .19119 an& co':tC.:iwlx4c; i2Xatil 01 of wail, inst,,Mments &h.01 h.we been Traid, each iiaut,zMbnent to be co2lect,ed with glees, collectsblo dv ina sapid year by 'ache County Auditor. 10. T31he CVyr 01-Drk Lo hv: -oby dir uas? to ruske llp file an -the office of the Co nq%yr Jk^ -' I.t,or of wno'ca C otun-i;y n certified et,'atemeht of the $3X:nu au of QKL :•1UCIA 1.A.1 t ".10 ";705 3.' 1'Iciti-i c'ini Ork arlo1 nt, t'Thich wjill be clue 'rheraon on tho ol- drnu in Qach year, The motion fior the aduni t:icn of the forogoin; resolut cis ims duly seconded by Councilman w-A upon vote being 4 1aken thereon the 9oIl6 •'lj� v'o i_vca �%s�rcofs 3�3 w V, C'AID RMl.'L`/i.ol mill DBcI :i:1 n i.�`,il ,!'�1 fi��FD AND ADOPTED ��l'IS RA OTC' ......A. y...�.,.<., ....w .� 3'g``•%',�r_, .6y im c;zer cc)=n MR a�i �JRIKtRJVtly CT!`'3� 0 ;F FRn LEX. y 40 i t I • ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, ALTERATION, LOCATION OR MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, PROVIDING FOR THE POSTING OF BONDS: THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND FEES THEREFOR, THE REVOCATION OF PERMITS: INSPECTION AND FEES THEREFOR: PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF: AND FOR REPEALING CITY CODE SECTION 45.06 SUBD. 8 AND ENACTING CHAPTER 56. The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: 1. There is hereby enacted a new Chapter of the City Code of Fridley as follows: 56. SIGN REGULATIONS 56.01 This ordinance shall hereafter be known and cited as the "Sign Regulations ". 56.02 DEFINITIONS. As used in this ordinance unless the context otherwise indicates: (1) SIGN. The Term "Sign" shall mean a name, identification, des- cription, display, illustration, structure or device which is affixed to, or painted, or represented directly or indirectly upon a building or other outdoor surface or piece of land, and which directs attention to an object, product, place, activity, person, institution,.organization or business. (2) SIGN. AUTOMOBILE SERVICE. The Term "Automobile Service Sign" means any sign that does not exceed 32 square feet directing the motorist travelling along the highway to a place or places catering to motoring needs.. These include: Auto laundry, eating establishment, motels, motor hotels, refreshment drive -ins, public garages, parking areas, repair garages, service stations, drive -in theatres, and amusements parks. (3) SIGN. BILLBOARD. The term "Billboard" means any sign erected, c:)r. —iicted, or maintained for the purpose of outdoor advertising, whether such • independently supported or placed upon the ground, roof or wall of any `ag, and the advertisement thereon does not relate to commodities 41 • • Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 2 being sold or the business being conducted upon the premises. (4) SIGN, BUSINESS. The term "Business Sign" shall mean any sign which directs attention to a business or profession or to the primary commodity, service'-or entertainment sold or offered upon the premises where such sign is located or to which it is attached. (5) SIGN, FLASHING. The term "Flashing Sign" shall mean any illuminated sign on which the artificial light is not maintained both sta- tionary and constant in intensity and color at all times when such a sign is in use. (6) SIGN, IDENTIFICATION. The term "Identification Sign" shall mean any sign identifying a resident, school, church or other non - business use. (7) SIGN, ILLUMINATED. \The term "Illuminated Sign" shall mean any sign which has characters, letters, figures, design or outline illumin- ated by electric lights or luminous tubes as a part of the sign proper. (8) SIGN, TEMPORARY. The term "Temporary Sign" shall mean any sign not over 40 square feet in industrial areas or 15 square feet in all other areas which is not permanently affixed to the ground or a building. Section 56.03 FEES. Permit fees for signs shall be: (1) For signs 40 square feet or less an initial fee of $10.00 and an annual charge of $5.00 for an inspection of such sign. The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly on a building, which advertises products sold or services provided in that building. (2) For signs larger than 40 squre feet the initial fee shall be $25.00 plus 25 cents per square foot of the sign - surface exceeding 100 square feet. The annual inspection fee shall be $12.50 plus 10 cents per square foot of the sign surface exceeding 100 square feet. Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 3 The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly on a building, which advertises products sold or services provided in that building. (3) No fees are required for the non - permit signs provided for in Section 56.06 and may be waived for religious, civic, school and public interests by a majority vote of the City Council. Section 56.04 PERMIT APPLICATION. Application for permits shall be made upon blanks provided by the Building Inspector and shall state or have attached thereto, the following information: (1) Name, address and telephone number of applicant. (2) Location of building, structure, or lot to which or upon which the sign is to be attached or erected. • (3) Position of the sign or other advertising structures in relation to nearest buildings, structures, public streets or rights of way. The drawing showing such position shall be prepared "in-scale." (4) Two blue prints or ink drawings of the plans and specifications and method of construction or attachment to the building or in the ground including all dimensions. Locating all light sources, ,atta:re, type and color of lights, and details of any light shields or shades. (5) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the structure is designed for dead load and wind velocity in the amount required by this and all other ordinances of the City. (6) -Name of person, firm, corporation, or association erecting structure. (7) Written consent of the owner of any land on which the • structure is to be erected. (8) Any electrical permit required for any sign. (9) AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY: (a) Which would authorize and direct the City of � - Page 4 � 0 ,1 _,ance Signs, B Fridley to remove and dispose of any signs and sign structure on which a permit has been issued but which was not renewed, if the owner does not remove the- iame within a 30 day period following the expiration'of the permit. ---- (b) Which would authorize and direct the City of Fridley to remove the sign and sign structure, at the expense of the applicant, where maintenance is required and the maintenance is not furnished, but only after a hearing and after a notice of 60 days specifying the maintenance.required by the City. (10) Such other information as the Building Inspector may require. Section 56.05 LICENSES AND BONDS, No person, firm, or corporation shall engage in the business of erecting signs, nor shall he e be entitled to a permit to erect a sign under this ordinance unless licensed to do so by the City Council. Such license may be granted by the City .Council after written application to the City Clerk, accompanied by an annual license fee of $25.00 and it may be terminated at any time for cause. The license shall expire on December 31st in the year of issuance and each year thereafter. No license shall take effect until the licenses shall file with the City Clerk a corporate surety bond in the sum of $1,000.00 conditioned that the licenses shall make proper application for all sign work, pay necessary permit fees, conform to all the provisions of this Chapter and indemnify and hold the City, its officers and agents, harmless from any damage or claim resulting from or related to the erection or maintenance of any sign in the City by the licensee. v .Section 56.06 PERMITS. It shall be unlawful to keep, install, construct, erect, alter, revise, reconstruct, or move any outdoor sign lu 0 K] 0�- :Anance - Signs, Billboards or sign structure within the City of "Fridley without first obtaireift a permit therefor., except the following: (1) A sign,not exceeding 15 square feet in area pertaining only to the sale, rental, or lease of the premises upon which displayed. (2) An identification sign, not exceeding 4 square feet in area, .(3) A business sign not exceeding 10 feet in area, which sign is placed on non- public property. (4) A temporary political sign in regard to a candidate or an election (5) A temporary sign erected by a religious, eleemosynary, charitable, benevolent, educational, public or civic interest, provided that each such sign sh shall bear the name and address of the responsible owner and shall be removed within 15 days after the date to which the temporary sign has relevance. All permits and the annual fees therefor shall expire April 30th of each year and must be renewed prior to that date. Section 56.07 GENERAL-REGULATIONS. No sign shall be erected or painted in the City of Fridley unless it shall conform to and meet these regulations: (1) No sign shall be installed, which by reason of position, shape or color would conflict with the proper functioning or interpretation of any traffic sign or signal. (2) There shall be no flashing signs in the front setback within 150 feet of a street intersection. K] Ordinance - Signs, Billboards �..,... _ T 4 E) w Page 6 Lighted revolving signs shall be permitted within this area but the bottom of the sign surface shall be a minimum of fourteen feet above the street grade at that point. .(3) Except for grand openings and holidays, banners and streamers may not be used. (4) There shall be no use of revolving beacons, zip flashers or similar devices that would so distract automobile traffic as to constitute a safety hazard. and the total sign area shall not exceed 18 square feet. (5) Except in Industrial Districts, signs shall not be painted directly to any exterior building surface but shall be on a separate frame except for temporary display windows. Sign letters, symbols may be • attached directly to a wall by adhesive or mechanical means. (6) Temporary signs advertising buildings for rent and for sale may be placed in the yard of such building providing such signs are not closer than 10 feet to any property line and do not exceed 40 square feet in industrial areas and 15 square feet in other areas. (7) Signs not otherwise allowed advertising new housing . developments of more than 30 building sites and located in Fridley may be constructed in any district, providing; Any one sign.is not over 600 square feet; the signs are located at least 300 feet from any pre- existing home and 1,000' from any sign advertising the same development and the signs are removed when the particular project is 95% sold.out. _ (8) Except for grand openings and temporary signs less I than 6 square feet, there shall be no temporary signs in any required • setback area. There shall be no more than three such signs on any parcel and the total sign area shall not exceed 18 square feet. r• Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 7 (9) All temporary signs shall comply immediately with these • performance standards upon the date this Chapter goes into effect. (10) No signs shall overhang the public right -of -way. (11) Directional signs not located on the premises of use in question may not be located in any district except by special permit. (12) 'The illumination of any sign located within 500 feet of any residential district lot line shall be diffused or indirect, non- flashing, and designed so as not to reflect rays of light into adjacent residences. .(13) TEMPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS. Temporary political signs shall be removed by the person or persons placing such signs within 15 days after the election for which they are applicable. Each such sign shall show the name and address, printed or indelible ink, of the person responsible for the placing of the sign, who shall be deemed prima facia the person who placed the sign and is responsible for its removal. No person shall deface or remove a temporary political sign, prior to 24 hours following the election, except with the consent and knowledge of the person responsible for the placing of the sign. (14) All signs shall be'maintained in good condition and the areas around them kept free from debris, bushes, high weeds, and from anything else which would be an eyesore or nuisance. The surface of all signs must be repainted at least once every two (2) years or whenever necessary as determined by inspection to prevent the sign surface from becoming unkempt in appearance. When any sign is removed, the building inspector shall be notified and the entire surrounding area shall be cleared of all debris and unsightly projections and protrusions. (15) In multiple unit dwellings one identification or business sign not exceeding 12 square feet shall be permitted for I 4 -8 • Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 8 each dwelling -group of 6 to 12 units. One identification or business sign not exceeding 40 square feet shall be permitted for each dwelling group of 12 or,more units. V . (16) The permit owner and the licensee shall each separately and jointly be responsible for all of the requirements of this Chapter, including the liability for expense of removal and maintenance incurred by the City. Section 56.08 SIGN REQUIREMENT BY LAND USE. If they conform to and meet the General Regulations, the following signs may be erected or maintained as shown for each district. No other signs shall be erected; except that-temporary political signs, may be erected in any district. • (1) R -1, R -2 and R -3 DISTRICTS_. a. Type - Identification and Business Signs only. b. Number - One only on any lot. c. Size - Not more than 12 square feet, except as provided for in 56.07 (15). d. Maximun height'- Not more than 4 feet above street grade. e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any sign in residential district shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from any property line. f. Illumination - Not permitted. (2) C -1 and C -IS DISTRICTS. • a. Type - Identification, Business and Automobile Service Signs. i b. Number - One per principal entrance or per building. • r� L • Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 9 c. Size - The gross surface area of all permitted signs on a lot or parcel shall not exceed the sum of 4 square feet per front foot of building. d. Height - No more than 4 feet above outside wall closest to the sign. e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any sign may project only two feet into setback from building. £. Illumination - Illuminated but non - flashing signs permitted. (3) C-2, C -2S and P DISTRICTS.. a. Type - Identification, Business, Automobile Service and Illuminated Signs permitted. b.. Number - Business Signs: One on building or one pylon or pedestal sign per each rental or separate business unit with frontage .on thoroughfare. One additional permitted for open 100 feet of frontage. c. Size - No sign'shall exceed 40 square feet. d. Height - No part of a pylon or pedestal sign shall be less than 14 feet vertical distance above the street grade level or more than 25 feet vertical distance above street grade level. Roof signs may not be over 6 feet above nearest outside wall. e. Projection - No sign shall be closer than 10 feet from the property line. f. Illumination - Illuminated and flashing signs permitted except those which are hazardous to vehicular traffic or create a nuisance to occupants of residences in the area. • Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 10 (4) 'M -1 and M -2 DISTRICTS. a. Types - All types permitted. `b. Number - One per each 500 feet of street frontage. c. Height - No ground sign over 30 feet above grade and no roof sign more than 30 feet above the nearest outside wall . Section 56.10 HARDSHIP WAIVER. The provisions of this chapter may be waived wherer a strict application would bring undue hardship and the public interest would not be seriously jeopardized after a public hearing before the Board of Appeals and an affirmative vote of 4 members of the City Council. Section 56.11. Any violation of this ordinance shall constitute • a misdemeanor. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense. Section 56.12.REPEAL. Subdivision 8 of Section 45.06 and any other portions of the Fridley City Code inconsistent with this chapter are hereby repealed. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1965. William 3. Nee, Mayor Attest: Marvin Brunsell City Clerk Hearing: .. First Reading: • Second Reading: Published.....: • Adopted and recommended to council for passage (after review by City Attorney) by the joint meeting of the Parks and Playgrounds Sub - Committee and Recreation Commission, August 30, 1965. ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE RELATING TO THE ORGANIZATION, POWER, AND AUTHOR- ITY OF THE CITY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION. The City %Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Section 1. That various sections of Chapter 24 of the Fridley City Code be amended as follows: Section 24.01 CREATION. There is hereby created a Parks and Recreation Commission for the City of Fridley. The commission shall consist of five Fridley residents, appointed by the City Council. The Commission Chairman shall be appointed by the City Council and shall also serve as a member of the Planning Commission. The initial members shall be appointed for staggered terms, so that the term of no more than one would conclude in any year. Thereafter, the members shall be appointed for terms,of three years. Both original and successive appointees shall serve until their successors are appointed • and qualified. A vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired portion of the term by the City Council. Members of the commission shall serve without compensa- tion and shall not be personally interested in any contracts of the commission. They shall at the beginning of each year select a vice - chairman and a secretary from their own number with duties in addition to commission membership implied by these titles. A majority shall con - stitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Section 24.02 SCOPE. The Parks and Recreation commission shall ad- vise the City Manager and Council on pperation of a program of parks, playgrounds, and public recreation. If any part of the public recrea- LLon nrogram of the community is administered directly by any public .)r prrivate agency other than the City, the commission shall have power o m'iice cooperative agreements with any such public or private agency for _he purpose of coordinating all the activities and facilities in- cluded in such public recreation program. The commission may make use of public property assigned to, or of private property leased or other- wise made available for public recreational use. Upon recommendation of the commission, the Council shall determine what land is to be ac- quired for recreational purposes, what land the commission -shall be permitted to use in carrying on its recreational program-, and what build - ings or other permanent structures are to be constructed upon such land. The commission shall advise the Council upon such matters and shall organize and review the operation of facilities made available to it r1 r • • • for recreational purposes, but it shall have no authority to acquire land in its own name or without the consent of the governmental unit in whose name such land is to be acquired. Section x,4.03 POWER. In order to carry on responsibilities provided herein, the commission shall have power to: (a) Adopt rules for its meetings and the transaction of its business and rules governing the use by the public of the recreation facilities under its control. (b) Consent and approve appointment by the Parks and Recrea- tion Director of personnel necessary to carry gout the responsibilities of the commission. (c) Accept gifts of real and personal property for public recreational purposes, subject to the provisions of Section 24.02. (d) Provide for maintenance and care of public property which has been assigned to it for public recreational purposes. (e) Perform whatever other, acts are reasonable and necessary and proper to carry out the commission's responsibilities under this ordinance. Section 24.04 PROGRAM. The commission shall each year prior to September 1, prepare a comprehensive program for parks improvement and acquisition and for public recreation activities for the ensuing year. The commission's program shall be described in terms of activities as well as finances. The budget of finances shall show: (a) Estimated revenues, divided as follows: (1) Amount appropriated by City Council (2) Contributions froqi private sources (3) Earnings from admissions and other charges made for use of facilities (4) Miscellaneous revenues; and (b) Estimated expenditures, divided as follows: (1) Administration payroll (2) Instructional and supervisory payroll (3) Maintenance and improvement payroll (4) Supplies (5) Printing (6) Postage, express freight, utility charges (7) Repairs (8) Rents .(9) Equipment (10) Real estate and improvements (11) Miscellaneous expenditures i lu • I• (12) Contractual services (13) Taxes and assessments (14) Consultant fees. Such budget shall tie submitted not later than June 1, to the City Manager. The final decisions,as to these contributions shall be reported back to the commission, which shall adjust the budget, if pessary. The ex- penditure allowances, as finally approved by the commission and City Council, shall control the year's.spending program. The commission shall not itself levy'.taxes or borrow money; and it shall not approve any claims or incur any obligations for expenditure. Section 24.05 FUNDS. For the purpose of financing the parks and recrea- tion program authorized by this chapter, the accounting shall be the responsibility of the treasurer of the City. The commission shall be authorized to establish charges or fees for the restricted use of any facilities or to make any phase of the recreation - program wholly or partially self- sustaining. Any employees who handle cash in the process of collection shall be bonded. Section 24.06 REPORTS. In matters relating to the recreation program, personnel and finances, advisory reports shall be made directly to the City Council through the City Manager. Matters relating to property purchases, capital improvements and facilities shall be reported to the City Council with recommendation of the Planning Commission. Section 24.07 ANNUAL REPORT. The commission shall, as soon as possible after the end of each calendar year, present to the City Council, a comprehensive annual report of its activities. Passed by the City Council of the City of Fridley this day of , 1965. ATTEST: Marvin C. Brunsell, City Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Published: William J. Nee, Mayor I r ` • • • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO REGULATE THE DISTRIBUTION .OF COMMERCIAL AND NON COMMERCIAL HANDBILLS, AND TO LICENSE PERSONS ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF DISTRIBUTING OF HANDBILLS FOR HIRE; TO DEFINE TERMS; AND TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF SUCH ORDINANCE AND TO BE DESIGNATED AS CHAPTER 20 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 20.01 PURPOSE That to protect the people against the nuisance of and incident to the promiscuous distribution of handbills and circulars, particularly commercial handbills, as herein defined, with the resulting detriment and danger to public health and safety, the public interest, convenience and necessity, requires the regulation thereof and to that end the purposes of this Ordinance are specifically declared to be as follows: (a) To protect the people against the unlawful activities or operations of desolate persons of criminal habits or tendencies, representing themselves as handbill distributors, by requiring the registration of all such distributors, together with the names of their employers, and by regulating the business of handbill and advertising distribution through the imposition of reasonable license fees. (b) To protect local residents against trespassing by handbill distributors upon the private property of such residents if they have given reasonable notice that they do not wish to be solicited by such persons or do not desire to receive handbills or advertising matter. (c) To protect the people against the health and safety menace and the expense incident to the littering of the streets and public places by the promiscuous and uncontrolled distribution of advertising matter and commercial handbills. (d) To preserve to the people their Constitutional right to recede and disseminate information not restricted under the ordinary rules of decency and good moral and public order, by distinguishing between the nuisance created by the promiscuous distribution of advertising and commercial circulars and the right to deliver non- commercial handbills to all who are willing to receive the same. I, • • n LJ 20.02 DEFINITION The following words, terms and phrases when used in this Ordinance have the meaning described to them in this Section except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: (a) "Commercial Handbill" shall mean and include any printed or written matter, any sample or device, dodger, circular, leaflet, pamphlet, paper, booklet, or any other printed or otherwise reproduced original or copies of any matter or literature: 1. Which advertises for sale any merchandise, product, commodity,.or thing; or 2. Which directs attention to any business or mercantile or commercial establishment or other activity, for the purpose of either directly or indirectly promoting the interest thereof by sales; or 3. Which, while containing leading matter other than advertising matter, is predominently and essentially an advertisement, and is distributed or circulated for advertising purposes, or for the private benefit end gain of any persons so engaged as advertiser or distributor.- (b) "Handbill Distributor" shall mean and include any person engaging or engaged in the business for hire or gain of distributing commercial or non commercial handbills, other than newspapers distributed to subscribers thereof, and any person receiving compensation directly or indirectly for the distribution of such handbill. (c) "Newspaper" shall mean and include any newspaper of general circulation as defined by law; and in addition thereto shall mean and include any periodical or current magazine regularly published with not less than 4 issues per year, and sold to the public. (d) "Noncommercial Handbills" shall mean and include any printed or written matter, any sample or device, dodger, circular, - leaflet, pamphlet, newspaper, magazine, paper booklet, or any other printed or otherwise reproduced original or copies of any matter or literature not include in the aforesaid definition of a commercial handbill or newspaper. (e) "Private Premises" shall mean and include any dwelling, house, building, or other structure, designed or used either wholly or in part for private residential purposes, whether inhabited or temporarily or continuously uninhabited or vacant, and shall include any yard, grounds, walk, driveway, porch, steps, vestibule or mailbox belonging or pertinent to such dwelling, house, building, or other structure. (f) "Public Place" shall mean and include any and all streets, -2- • boulevards, avenues, lanes, alleys, or other public ways, and any and all public parks, squares, spaces, plazas, grounds and buildings. 20.03 THROWING HANDBILLS It shall *be unlawful for any person to deposit, place, throw,, scatter or cast'any commercial handbill in or upon any public place within their City; and it shall be also unlawful for any person to hand out or distribute or sell any commercial handbill in any public place; provided, however, that it shall not be unlawful for any person to hand out or distribute, without charge to the receiver thereof, any noncommercial handbill in any public place to any person willing to accept such noncommercial handbill. 20.04 PLACING IN VEHICLE It shall be unlawful for any person to distribute, deposit, place, throw, scatter, or cast any commercial or noncommercial handbill in or upon any automobile or other vehicle. The provisions of this Section shall not be deemed to prohibit the handing, transmitting, or distributing of any noncommercial handbill to the owner or other occupant of any automobile or other vehicle, who is willing to accept the same. • 20.05 DISTRIBUTION VACANT COMMERCIAL It shall be unlawful for any person to distribute, deposit, place, throw, scatter or cast any commercial or noncommercial handbill in or upon any private premises which are temporarily or continuously uninhabited or vacant. 20.06 POSTED PROPERTY It shall be unlawful for any person to distribute, deposit, place, throw, scatter or cast any commercial or noncommercial handbill upon any premises if requested by anyone thereon not to do so, or if there is placed upon said premises in a conspicuous position near the entrance thereof, a sign bearing the words: "No Trespassing!!, "No Peddlers or Agents ", "No Advertisements ", or any similar notice, indicating in any manner that the occupants of said premises do not desire to be molested or to have their right of privacy disturbed, or to have any such handbills left upon such premises. 20.07 INHABITED PRIVATE PREMISES No persons licensed under the provisions of this Ordinance, or any other person, shall distribute, deposit, place, throw, scatter or cast any commercial or noncommercial handbill in or upon any private premises which are inhabited, except by handing or •-transmitting any such handbill directly to the owner, occupant, or any other person then present in or upon such private premises; provided, however, that in case of inhabited private premises which are not posted as provided in this chapter, the aforesaid licensed or other person, unless requested by any one upon such premises not -3- to do so, may place or deposit any such handbill in or upon such inhabited private premises, if such handbill is so placed or deposited'' as to secure or prevent such handbill from being flown or drifted about such premises or elsewhere, except that mailboxes may not be so used when so prohibited by Federal Postal Laws or regulations. 20.08 IDENTIFICATION It shall be unlawful for any person to distribute, deposit, scatter, hand out or circulate any commercial or noncommercial handbill in any place under any circumstances which does not have printed on the cover, front or back thereof, the name and address of the following: (a) The person who printed, wrote, compiled or manufactured the same. (b) The person who caused the same to be distributed. 20.09 DISTRIBUTORS - LICENSE FEE (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of handbill distributor for hire or`for any person to distribute commercial or noncommercial handbills without first complying with the terms of this chapter and all other relevant laws and regulations; provided, that nothing contained herein shall apply to any person advertising his business or activity upon his own premises. (b) Any person desiring to engage,as principal, in the business of distributing commercial or noncommercial handbills for hire, shall make application to and receive from the City Manager or other persons empowered to issue the same, a license in the manner and for the period prescribed by the terms of this chapter. Such applicant shall make written application to the City upon a form or forms provided for. such purpose. Such form shall contain,among - other things, the name, the business address, and a brief description of the nature of the business to be conducted by the applicant, the probable number of agents and employees so to be engaged, together with a request for a license for the period for which the applicant seeks to engage in such business. (c) Without excluding other just grounds for revocation, the City Council, or officials so empowered by law, may revoke any license obtained under an application containing a false or fraudulent statement knowingly made by the applicant with intent to obtain a license by means of false or fraudulent representation, or for violation of this Chapter, or any other grounds specified by law. Such application shall be accompanied by the fee hereinafter provided for in this Chapter. No license issued under this Chapter shall be transferrable; and if any such license shall be surrendered by the licensee therein named, or shall be revoked for cause, neither the licensee named in such license, nor any other person, shall be entitled to any refund of any part of such fee. -4- 0 U J (d) License fees under the terms of this Chapter and for any such purpose, shall.be as follows: For a period of one year, the sum of $50.00 For a petiod of three months, the sum of $25.00 For a period of one week, the sum of $15.00 For a period of one day, the sum of $10.00 provided, that persons acting for licensees as agents or employees, in the distributing of any such handbills shall not be required to obtain a license or pay a fee, but each such person shall comply with each and all of the other provisions thereof and be subject thereto. 20.10 EXEMPTIONS The provisions of this Chapter shall not be deemed to apply Lo 'ie distribution of mail by the United States, nor to newspapers �em•ral circulation. 20.t'11 OFFENSIVE HANDBILLS.. It shall be unlawful for any person to hand out, distribute or transmit a handbill which is offensive to public morals or decency, or which contains blasphemous, obscent, libelous or scurrilous language. 20.,'12 PENALTIES Any person who violates any portion of this Chapter is subject to the penalties set forth in Chapter 1051of the Fridley City Code. .PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1965. ATTEST: Marvin Brunsell City Clerk First Reading Second Reading Publication _5.. ti William J. Nee Mayor 15-3 5 4i v , I oi, 1.0.4 of lqej") ; ""m r �:,,i is nA_r,.;horJ7.ad to a=e:s,dv,d, Ue T."m i1v vu:16, uonv, 44 , 1 1�3 , �,t h,4E,_ exlx ,nd finvrf.�mO eusilcrk-,-(,Aorn ;�, I 't 1*01. p-.M=�.ret, and mel"u- _� - _30 " " of On -uxbmn -wo"f�to-V` in m.& tho eov.. Al In I n n01 r, F,17 XIOFult 'of m u)z �A I th& FvJ d-k-Kir Uoix, _RJ�if; 70" Urvom ::,nd pl.w!m On tha 12i.,a m_%-, on '.-he North both .1.� I IVer to a y Oil the 1 1-1., -30 foot ctfmltoux�? St f V. OUng 'those tbo RI., 'Fer OOTNCIL OF MIN" CITY iyv! Mg 1, `inat 11-11e, Ax%,!4n, above An AC , an axma in L:,�f�c!y ,,��".701.-j,",CA-,It 0:�.' 1?e3h?.MLd71t*tiM1 AZ Z Xe;MAIL Of it-, Cyr -1 U11, by an 'Uwbm .,y and of POO. L L OW4 On tha 12i.,a m_%-, on '.-he North both .1.� I IVer to a y Oil the 1 1-1., -30 foot ctfmltoux�? St f V. OUng 'those tbo RI., 'Fer OOTNCIL OF MIN" CITY iyv! Mg 1, `inat 11-11e, Ax%,!4n, above An AC , an axma in L:,�f�c!y ,,��".701.-j,",CA-,It 0:�.' 1?e3h?.MLd71t*tiM1 AZ Z Xe;MAIL Of GO i and As two 11 p_.., W & . ! too P i ' " Cro-.,5z 1'.,rojact Cost and thT oaz�•zdz or vt�l v of Sze -ajact land sold, 7 t d, ov rat inr. -4.i for u ae im necoz dau oo u th the urban rme mal plan; (d) t�a.%t; t a i1 .�.2 U-� . pera psx. d. and cax -iQd out s plan for the en- to t ' &XtefAt 90"1'0101 of tltvao ;WoVision of d_taollir,;as suitablo for the n",,Jz of individtvrlsa rind families displaced by '::hog vke,�or diaauteati or b y or rababititation activitios In 00=ecltion with the prca 'scj; it In the a0rajot of this body that cacr'� conditi.orm mi m Lid will Un. cocrj' :i.rr'1 vith. . 7A&t the, riling of an appliantion by the itidley Housing alld. R*d- ermloplasxlt A%vecority for mn..-voya au-Ld plana for an urban renewal .r , „„ zct : n the Urbzm Renecm,"& Azi- , :lvmcri. L-ed abova is Eby &pa=ve d• ' pISS ;�� da iQ 1-',� CSrf Ct?uPdCtL C& THE CI'I? OF i iLEfC, 16211 ESOTA, Ws 96th -dray of Aug uas-t, 1965- • C l t�rie: William J. M”, mayor ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 77.01 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE SO AS TO AUTHORIZE THE DIRECTOR OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION TO OPEN AND CLOSE THE BATHING BEACHES IN THE CITY, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 77.01 of the City Code of Fridley is-amend- ed as hereinafter indicated. Section 2. Section 77.01 The date of the opening and closing of the municipal bathing beaches shall lie determined by the Director of Parks and Recreation, eacb calendar year. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, this day of -- , 1965. i William J. Nee, Mayor • ATTEST: Marvin J. Brunsell, City Clerk First Reading: September 20, 1965 Second Reading: Published: ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL TEAR 1966 . Tai CITY OF FRIDLEY CHDAINS 3 SECTION 1: That the awmal lodger of the City of Fridley for the fiscal year beginning Jana wy 1, 1966 which has been Imbiei.tted by the City Manager and modified and approved by the City Council is hereby adopted; the total of the -said budget and the major divisions thereof being as followat SSVERE AVAI MIS CST DEVEM: 'GENERAL FUND: 6 General Property Tax : . . $ 487;,409.00 City Council. . . . . . .$ 19,300.00 Licenses and Permits . . . . 47,830.00 City Manager °s Office . 35,781.00 Hoes and Porfeitur". . . 0 179400.00 Municipal Court . . . . . . . 17,945.00 From Other Agencies. . . . 101,343.00 Elections & Registration* . 11,740.00 Service Charges. . e 6,532.^0 Finance . . . . 51,532.00 Nob - Revenue Receipts . , 1,11 700.00 Auditing. . . . . . . . . 4,9600.00 TOTAL $ 712,214.00 Legal . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,810.00 Boards & Commissions. . . . 4,765.00 GENERAL PBOPSRTY TAXES Buildings & Grounds . . . . 29,595.00 FOR OrHBR BLINDS: Police. . . . . . . . . . . 170,300.00. Fire .. . . . . ... . . . . . 62,868.00 Debt Service Fund - Parks..$ 33,945.00 Building Inspection . . a a, '% 32,434.00 Public Employees Retirement Civil Defense . . . ... . . . 7,241.00 Fund. . . . . . . . . . 193,424.00 Engineering. . . . . . . . . 31,349.00 Firemenes Relief Fund Public Works. . . . . . . . .. 126,618.00 Insurance Refund. . . . 4,850.00 Street Lighting . . . . . . . 27,296.00. Will Levy. . . . . . . 149440.00 sanitation & Health . . . . . 8,975.00 State Aid - Highways. . . . 94'2674.00 Parks, Recreation & Band. . . 96,265.00 Debt Service Fund - Health & Hospital Insurance . 7,550.00 Improvement Bonds . . . 52,170.00 Library. . . . . . . . . . . 1,250.00 Debt Service Fund - Reserve . . . . . . . . . 15,000..00 Civic Center Bonds . . 212815.00 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 772,214.00 TOTAL 241,31 .00 (JIM FUNDS TOTAL ALL FUNDS 81.013 532.,00 P.E.B.A. . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,424.00 Firemen °s Relief . . . . . . 19,290.00 Debt Service - Park Bonds. . 339945.00 State Aid - Highways 94,674.00 Debt Service - I=W. Bawds. 520170.00 Debt Service - Civic Coat. Bd s21 815.00 TOTAL 241, TOTAL ALL YMMS J1.013,532.AO SBCTIGN 2: That the City Manager be directed to cause the appropriate. accounting . entries to be made in the books of the City. PASSED AND ADOPTAD BY THS CM COUKIL THIS_._ .PAY OF , 1965. • ATT9ST wiilio: J. We WE First Heading: SSeterbe_ r 10 :,1965' Second Reading: Marvin C. Brune *11, City Clerk Fublieh: ajkcT 9m MammUms. —' `( \u` DATE OF I*?A OF FIM4 SS�RITY BID PRICE DSknm T ---M : =d ZSOt= Sales W. Yy.,� n street ,131 A Do7hd , VAnnesota 111,m= Co zany . 1700 Cengtrggall. Avenue N.B, ** Xn.' son Dodge- Dart ,(C 1201 Last Lwce stmt Kinnoapolis, Minnesota / B;:W1 dway C "Paler- Plymouth . 1527 Wont Broadway. Minnempol is, Minnesota Ccntral Motor Stiles r Inc* �� s,cQ '.z c c� j 9 (0 6 �/�c.-r• fi 2007 Central Avenue N.B. ✓�O � Minneapolis, Minnesota River FkOtors • 656 East gaits Street / Day ntown Chryslar- Plymouth 1518 Hennepin Avenue Hinncz,polis, Minnesota Nain a:otor SAleess ,Ccvpary' C =ems —.c rya! 9G6 �� 222 :7Z aat Nain Street Aaad4ao Minnesota Nc t lkside marcury-comet 800 West Broa4way Minnpolis, Minnesota Midway Dodge, Inc. 10110 University Avenue St. Paul, . i n osota Jack. Z- :,Ulligan Fomde Inc* , 683 Zast 7th Street st o Paulo Minnesota �J r: lT • ' DATE OF OF S I.D PRIM ALX 185 �aTa4�e�a!3:}��,yl Avcnuu S diII4r(Y1{�!I�� wta pi , Attrti mcd D2 t' . farm Nr%ik Dm:: ltc, a chavr olet ` Co., Place a ®.s.:dso Rumesota lsc�f 5 (- %avroleto. IACe 1625 ost Bxoadway , ��<� S�1'nc�ol�to I�vao -C.-Irmcal s';8lle BOB* , f7llpolise Minnesota ozvcc� 73tcr CcZTm y 20x"5 M,'i.1 Avenue bier Sales b ��' : i �°e�►.�c f ct�! C�-a �-f't- (9� 1 " /��c �*�'— 46 G a e8�� ,wl -at�al AVCnUG NeEO ; ? � Bcb — F =d COMPaMV 10; w.al AvGuas • K �aa 654 u -m.lvar city Avenue St. Paul's Minnesota 0 GG iTI"Z OF FRIDLZY ANOIKA COtAM FRIDLRY, Mn=SOTA september 28. 1965 STANDARD SPBCIFICATIOHS AND AC'LEPTABLB BRANDS LIST FOR FOUR DOOR SRDAN r . , is � �. ;. �• !_!;_ =._�.: _.s� Vehicles bid shall meet the manufacturer's advertised specifications as well as all requirements contained is these specifications. AM Latest modal four door unit as specifieds fully en- closed steel body= approved safety glass in all doors. windows and windshield= latches on all doors and trunk. standard type interior trim in colors harmonizing with exterior.. Body color to be specified by Bidder. 4=Z& All standard equipmeint plus any accessories specified herein which may be optional: Manufacturer's accessary deluxe fresh air type heater with dual windshield defrosters; dual windshield wipers (if vacuum type crust contain booster); windshield washers= inside rear vision mirrors left mounted outside rear vision mirrors two sun visors= area rests on front doors; ash receptacles foam rubber front seater two safety belts front, floor anchored, to meet S,.A.B. specification J-" (50000 . . jam& Manufactureres standard headlights with high and low beams oPwated by foot switch; two tail and stop lighter other lights to include parking, donne, dash and directional turn signals with automatic cancelling. WIIQTERIZB Unless otherwise specified sedans delivered during winter season, September 1st thru April 30thp to be completely winterised ineludirrj permanent type glycol base anti - freeze of • a non - foaming type to protect to 35 degrees below zero. REDBLMU Regular manufacturer °s standard warranty and completed predelivery inspection certificates required with each unit. Rach unit must be completely serviced by the successful bidder in accordance with the standard new car 5TAMWVPI*� 6 Peg * 2, • MAIMMax (continued) "Make Ready" and ma nufacturer F s reConUndations. The crankcaso,, differential and transmission must be filled to capacity as is rec ad by manufacturer, Each vehicles must have no less than five gallons of gasoline and be In first class operating condition, IWAM i0usu£acturer ° s deluxe fresh air type heater with dash mounted teamperatures, air and blower controls and with dual wind- shield defroaaters, shall be compact sedan. The following makes of vehicles only may be bid and supplied as listeds • Ford Falcon Plymouth Valiant Dodge Dart Rambler American Chevrolet Chevy II Mercury Comet These requirements are in addition to the General Require- ments" ct,+9.M Shall includes angina - 101 H.P. muUJIua Battery +*Planufacturer °s optional heavy duty battery Tires and Rims - 6050 x 13 minimum or equivalent, tubeless first line tires, Spare wheel and tire mounted in trunk (5 wheels and tires) , Tires to be make and brand furnished by car manufacturer as original equipment,, The following optional equlw.;mt shall be furniaaheds F)8 MUZED.AWD SA."CIFICATIONS - FOUR DOM SEMN. page :!,. 2121COM.M.M.P" (cOntinu6d) • Mud and SnW Tires on rWW Wheels Automatic traramission - as supplied by thO MMUfWturGt for model fUmished, 0 0 • CONPACT CAR BID PROPOSAL Fridley,, Minnesota October 4,, 1965 - 12 :00 o'clock Noon Proposal of Address we propose to furor and deliver to the City of Fridley, am compact car as follows: One - 1965 4-door sedan Hoke model Shipping Weight Detail and Rquipment: Car to be delivered not later than Cash price (less Federal Tax and without trade -in) $ A certified check its the amount of $ is herewith enclosed, By 0 69 • TO APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA OWNER'S NAME BUILDER /' ADDRESS (: (• z % f - .� Z.. �rL_ADDRESS ,1.1 ? i LOCATION OF BUILDING N0. / f STREET.C: �L1,, /.. �. PART OF LOT LOT ____J u BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION /� :i (,, �i..:,r.�,� �,��P.2.��v 0j lL! CORNER LOT INSIDE LOT SETBACK 3 SIDE -YARD SEWER ELEVATION _ FOUNDATION ELEVATION ` Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates' of.Survey`af. Lot ana'proposed-',' building location drawn on these Certificates. "DESCRIPTION OF�Bun=NG r To be used as: Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Front Depth_ Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft... Gam' Type of Construction rEstimated Cost /i "i J �' _ To be completed The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct, DATE _ l '' C �� SIGNATURE (Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side). ��r 7r -jZj ffINEEIZING Co' ENGINEERS AND 5UqVENre0PZ,9 LAND 5UPkl,/EYfN0 S011-5 TESTING CIVIL a. MQNICIPXL ENOINEEMING L^r-40 PLANNING 6418-56rw AVENUE N. MINNEAPOLIS 2T, MINN. KE 7- 3637 le ca it it 41D lip up"ripyr • /0 L C ji 71 31 WE REPE5Y CERTIFY THRr THIS 15 A TRUE hNO CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF K SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DE5CIZI BED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF Ikuy, "T"EjZEot4 , AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SND LAND. MINDER ENGINEERING CO., INC. DATED Th15- 001Y OF 115 r., ENG0411ECL5 AND suQwvriyop-s by ::2 r".r) / 1 • _e-z, 'v-s7- AT Ae 0 0 OWNER'S NAME APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF FRIDLEY_ MINNESOTA ADDRESS _Sr ADDRESS LOCATION OF BUILDING No. �i�h,C^' Street qtr % = �:,�?- --Part of Lot LOT BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION Corner Lot Inside LOT L� Setback ('` Side -Yard 3 SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION ELEVATION Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed bcildins location drawn on these Certificates. To be used as: DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING ,pirrY—� ✓ 44'A'! Front /7- Depth height Sq. Ft. -V Cu. Ft. 41 Front Depth Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Type of Construction Estimated Cost To be completed The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work-herein specified, agreeing to'do all work in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. DATE (Schedule of Fee Costs can be/found on the Reverse Side). 7113 74 s 1 land Plonnln 9 `� 68?S N hm� OCs #i. � � � C:r,,fS��vlir� Mirn�eopnlis32. GI EFZ IN!G, INC. �e -;'• ,"'U;y Minnesola L /'i l :i ti luni(rPcJl � SUnsef Q 6066 9 En�ineers Surveyors --- =rvev No 7 ri LTq y h ., - �, w / 1 � ate. -_ .� _.� ✓ .-, j 1 /ruc an,.' tarred represenla {ion ea surrey 6f the boundaries ,l'the /vnJ shore dtsutibed and #°ffie /ocafian o`aIl buddkg n; anc' o/' 115i6le enerwehm n s,;,fWy, /1.67 a" an so�lai�d. T1J,,jj rrey 6 MC&- 01l ry wredf wj* a ma-1, a e /oa &W ,, l'rc vista r/� and no liobili y n afscvned except k 6e hoIdPr ofmxb mirf vgil A" my olher arferesl at�wrtd by t1,e rso"7 a� acrd ayreed no awLawenfs hnre Seen placed �r N,t ; n,,rr. use ,f eslobh;h% fr 101 165 a- fia 1nA y corners.. y: SUBURBAN ENG/NEfRING, INL. day fn ineerS and Sarre(JOrS If 7 ,. J 0 OWNER'S ADDRESS APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT _i3/ CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA '. ,. ADDRESS LOCATION OF BUILDING ;. N0. �� 3 STREET Q _ /�(irC. _ PART OF LOT LOT BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISIONAgla?4 4t t.,/ ,,t s L ----- CORNER LOT INSIDE LOT-4—SETBACK SIDE -YARD_ . r r L•it 7 -. SEWER ELEVATION _ FOUNDATION ELEVATION ` Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and''proposed` building location drawn on these Certificates. DESCRIPTION OF�BUILDING s To be used as. .. •�� Front_Depth,_2nr_Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Front Depth Height' Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft." Type of Construction �i- +-4. -- Estimated Cost �0L.3, © c o To be completed The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City of _ r Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby ,,-j Ir declares that all the facts and representations stated in-'this application.: . are true and correct. DATE�!'.- r J SIGNATURE (Schedule of Fee Costs can be found on the Reverse Side). - lie� -�•� -sue ,�.._ - !� 1 ' �' ��r a BUXLbVJbNG BOAIW MI SS SEPMUER 22, 1965 • The meeting was called to carder by Acting Chairen Kirkham at 7 :00 P.M. MEMNERS Kirkham, gauge (Ward 1), Wallace, Tonco (Ward 2) M EM ABSMMa Chairman Kravik, Border (Ward 3) VISITORS PRESENTS Sheldon Mortenson, Bernard Xulkowski, Sohn Theisen 1. CONSIDERATION Or 32 STREATS Motion for approval of the Building Permit was made by Wallace. Seceded by gauge. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Acting Chairman Kirk- ham declared the action carried.. 2. Motion for approval of the Building Permit was made by gauge. Seconded by Teco. Upon a voice vote,, there being no nays, Acting Chairman Kirkham declared the nation carried. • 3. COdiSIEDERATION Of A REQITEST BY e.m�cmrrrr� r r.�� RUTAURANT AT $275 CENTRAL ATEIM Motion for approval of the Building Permit was made by Wallace. Seconded by Tonco. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Acting Chairman Kirkham declared the motion carried. Mabee Ellis arrived at 7 :30 P.M. 6. C=3IDERATX(= OF A RECXEST BY JOMH THEItS A WE"T[ STORE AT 6525 UNIIVERSI`iT A : Motion fear 'approval of the Building Pam it was made .by Wallace, contingent upon a redwood, ?vacy fence, sits feet kigh, being built along the entire East line ef',this property. Seconded by gauge. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, - Acting Chairman Kirkham declared the notion carried. There being no further business, Acting Chairman Kirkham, declared the meeting adjourned at 7:60 P.M. Respectfully subm ted: Allen ti. � ,Building. Inspector Acting Secretary to the Board 0 SPECIAL SMTZ CMWTM HMM G MI MS - SEPMfBER 30. 1965 the meeting was called to order at 7 :10 P. M. by Vice - Chairman Linton. MEM PS8SERTi Larson, Linton, Bamdel, Szegda, Fritz, Oden, Weiss OTl�BS ,PSESBN�T: City Manager Wagner, Joha Theisen and Art Swanson, Manager of Theisenls Market. She Committee discussed ingress and egress to this property with Mr. Theisen and Mr. Smansan. Motion by Fritz, seconded by Weiss, that the plans be accepted with the addition of curb returns onto the property parallel to, and for the depth of, the parking space perpendicular to Mississippi Street and nearest to the entrance, and approving the access auto the University service road when the present University Avenue becomes a service road, and if access is permitted by the State Highway Department onto the University service road. Upon a voles vote, there being no nays, Vice - Chairman Linton declared the motion carried. ADJ0�l1iNl�NTt ' There being no further bossiness Vice - Chairman Linton declared the meeting adjourned at 7 :20 P. M. Respectfully submitted, Debris Bandel Secretary to the Committee • PLANNING C%TaSSIOr VIME T'NG, - SEP9.'P,.M 23, 1965 PACE I The meeting was called to order by acting chairman Bandel at 7.45 P.M. U ROLL CALL Members present: Hughes, Johanson, Bendel, Bergman Member absent. Kravik Others present: Engineering Assistant Clark APPROVE MINUTES OF PLANIVING COM ISSION IIEETIE -C OF SEPTEMBER 9 1965: MOTION by Hughes, seconded by Johanson, that the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of September 9, 1965 be approved. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. RECEIVE IINiTTES OF PARKS AND PLAYCROUNDS SUB- COMITTEB MEETING OF SEPTRMBER 2¢ 1965: MOTION by Iiughes, seconded by Johanson, that the Planning Commission receive the minutes of the Park,- and Playgrounds Sub- Co maaittee meeting of September 2, 1965. Upon a voice vote, all. voting aye, the motion carried. 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC IMARrUCL. RRZ #65-04 DR. T. H. LESTER: outlot #1, Melody 4th Addition. Rezone from R -1 (single family dwelling) to C -1 (local business areas). Dr. Lester presented a certificate of survey for the area he is interested in, being the North 400.00 feet of the West 217.80 feet of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, subject to an easement over the West 30 feet thereof for street purposes. Dr. Lester stated he would like to get a building permit. The Commission explained that in this instance, it Mould be advisable to ask for the rezoning category CR -1, which ordinance will be published September 29th and be in effect when fir. Lester is ready to build. Because there are no streets in that area yet, Dr. Lester War informed that now is the best tine to get the necessary dedications for streets, namely from Mr. Watson, Mr. tlafner and the Unity hospital. Also, future plans for sewer and water should be considered at thin stage. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission approve of the rezoning request (ZOA #65-04) by Dr. T. H. Lester for the North 400.00 feet of the West 217.80 feet of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th • Addition, subject to an easement over the West 30 feet thereof for street purposes revising the request to read "rezone from R•1 (single family dwelling) to CR -1 (offices and office buildings for medical, dental, :Plaxtuir�g sa �,.�n ��`�et:t r .. � ex ....,, a, e....... ....._N.....»�......_...�._ ---- • optical $ ».z b;xaic4 to 4 a ca° yaps, h ieus and inoffensive- la boratorier accessory to r ; -,4*'ujUted akaa s in ,Same bv't.laiu.g)" and reco send approval 'vot.In , * a t�,he =t ion carried. by Cota i, EC At this the ova o- x :„p bti r ,: tip l;casrz3iti:g the : ecluireuoentr o£ setbaacks, pacirb aye -as„ etcei�y aw+i. ta<i fro�xa the new ordinance creating Ctrl atrt;v Yc�,ts„ �a� Ct� °n;�isvi�n tc�l.t C��is sl uld be aonfidexed along with the rdl- asoce. caus6 of the a urunt. o£ land involved, it. w-as euggesaed to Dr. Lester that a lot split would be required beforo a building permit could be issued. If hay wisbad to build. this year, hkt could risk Council for a lot split at the sere as than rezouing. IdE?l."tON by Hughes, se xaded by BeTV08r., than, the Planning COWmifsion recovwnd to Council that, if the {per of the North 400.00 feet of the West 217.84 lest of ttlot 1, %lelcsdy manor, 4th Addition, so desiref a lot split separating the land, be approved. Upon a voice vats, all voting aye, the motion carried. �C ®IJi1gi PUBLIC 1-, -» 1RG' - - PbMON CO.. ItIC. Peorron' s 2, industrial Park. That part. of .y k of M and SEk of SE's of Section 3, lying vast of Great 11orthern R ad.1road RI114 and East of East Jives Road q'here was no one present for the S. G. Pearson Company, Inc. ID lir. Edgar Thayer, ra resident in the area, inquired about proposed plans for this area. V= ,10N by jobsusm, seconded by ftghos, that the Planning COMAissLon coatim> e the public hearing of the preliminary plat (P.,S- x'65 -03), S�, G , Paterson C�Ay,� ,arc,, ('pesrstma 6 Industrial ;parVA being that part of SWk of SZk an SEk eaf SEk of Ssctlom 3 lying west of GN Rd. R/W and, ease of East River Road uanttl the next regular meeting of October 14, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion (�+ ttted- 3 „ Cp1 NUED Loo SPLIT RE I71:S7C o I},. S 4 6409 OVi RAYIIrY° 'Prot 13, and N of �t 1,4, Block l6, Hamilton �- Addition to E�eclbanlcavills. No *no was present to discuss this watttr.. W 0 ,HonoN by aoh=soa, seconded by tb¢ghes, that the Planning Comeissioa continue that door split ft.S� #64 -CAS) request by Orville Ratley, being Lot 13 end of 'LO 14, Block 16, klsil,ton$s .Addition to Mechanicsville until the next regular Meting of October 14, 1965 Upon a voice vote, the motion carried„ Mr. Vaghes ezplained that the park superintendent, at the present Sub- is biyed Fridl,eyhasaenough park property o use playgrounds Serb Cc+�sit,ts+a Pam 3 • fV11 Tul, TH4 wwa would be tindolv the the _i�espouslbftrcy -f'o? ac tu's 1, a :�I t-c T i(JI OS a It he CA 0, Managet', 0 the 'Planning commisvion concwt xOith Ohs m;;,r_A fee xadl reconmod that the City I itx,!� P& k Super-Intendent to be ,we'A'i tb tc hT. the I, t. i i, 'h z. izatce vote, all voting 11w Corwlsiion con.iulwr ed the dibcu4M.on of CI-1 setback, parking and Ahvr reqUIrM*Ot% lit was lelt ztit r the membe:re take note of the new send 6 Cady e >a csit Fs w as uet backs, parking, etc. �'O'Iative w tIAO C'?.-I disc r iclt coed e;t w.,h& fj6xt of the Planning t:h*6e Jtrms. ADJOLMMNTS There being no further business, Acting Chairman Bandel adjourned the we'&ting at 9020 Respectfully submitted, Hazel 0f' Brian W'Sanding P'8Cr&tMLV'V FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING - 5E PTEP1BER 15, 1965 The meeting was called to order at 8:1,1v P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Richard Herder, Commissioners Paul Barrow and Lois Mullin, . Executive Director Allan Anderson, and Los-al Consul Wyman Smith. Commissioner Robert Kendall arrived later. Visitors: Mayor Bill Nee, City Manager Earl Warmer, Councilman John Wright. Steve Hawrysh, and Dave A1bo - --ts . Absent: John I•toyer APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 8, 196 Mrs. Mullin made a motion that the minutes of the meeting of September 8, 1965, be approved as read. Mr. Barrow seconded. There bti.ng no nays, said motion carried unanimously. COMMUNICATIONS - LETTER FROM ST. WILLIAM9 S CHURCH Mr. Anderson stated that he had received a letter from St. William's Church stating that the Urban Renewal meeting had been changed to October 12, 1965, • at 8 :0:% P.M. It was decided that Mr. Anderson would attend this meeting and the Commission would ask Mr. Kendall to attend also. When Mr. Kendall arrived later in the meeting, however, he said he Mould not be able to attend on this date. Therefore, it was decided that either Nr. Ba;,,.°row or Mr. Herder would attend. CMIMUNICATIONS - FRIDLEY TAX PAYM GROUP Chairman Herder stated that the Fridley Tax Payers Group hard requested a tour and an explanation of the proposed Urban Renewal ar ; >as. He further stated that he had seat up this meeting for Saturday, Septenber 18, 1965 at 1 :30 P.M. Re indicated that the meeting would also be open to the public and any interested persons should be invited. COMMUNICATIONS - LETTER FROM LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Chairman Herder read a letter from Mrs. Jackson of the Fridley League of Women Voters giving the speakers format for their meeting of September j%;, 1965. In this letter, Mrs. Jackson had indicated that two speakers will talk on Urban Renewal with Federal Aid, and two speakers will debate Urban Renewal with Private Funds. Chairman Herder stated that he did not feel the Arathority should argue in favor of Federal Aid as the Commission had made no recommendation for either Federal Aid or Private Funds. He further- stated that the Authority had been invited to talk on the Pros and Cons of Urban Renewal in the City of Fridley and would be ;pilling to debate this, howe$ve : °, he personally preferred private funds for redevelopment and felt that neithor has nor this Commission nU should be asked to debate Private Funds versus Federal kid. After a further discussion, it was decided that Mr. Anderson should send a letter to Mrs. Jackson giving the Commission's stand. CCXORMICATIONS - FRLDLEY CRUIBER OF. CO MRRCE Mr. Anderson stated that Bob Christianson had invited him to attend a Fridley Chamber of Commerce luncheon on Thurso day, September 16, 1965. At this meeting, the Chamber of Commerce is planning to show a film on Urban. Renewal and thought Mr. Anderson might want to see the film and mower any questions that might be derived from it. Mr. Anderson stated that he is pla=ing to attend. It was suggested that the Commission might ask the Chamber of Commerce to hold an open meeting for all Fridley Businessmen for a factual presentation of Urban Renewal. It was further suggested that they might invite the Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce and have an open debate on Urban Renewal. EXBCV.r1VE DIRECTOR'S REPORT - STATUS OF S & P APPLICATIONS Mr. Anderson stated that the documentation is now complete for the S &. P Applications for the Riverview and the City Center areas. The collating and binding is being done this evening and the S & P's should be in the mail to Chicago URA by 9:0v A.M. Thursday, September 16, 1965. E(ECUTiVE DIRECTOR'S P.FFORT » RELF,ASE OF FLANS TO HIGHWAY DEPART • Mr. Anderson stated that he had talked with Mr. Wagner main about these plans and Mr. Wagner's position was still the same; that had no time at the present to work on these plans. Mr. Wagner further stated that he could not present the plans to the City Council until his engineer had time to go over them. It was noted that Mr. Hodne had discussed this with the Highway Department and they are willing to work on the plans and determines the feasibility of the proposed lines and make general recommendations. Nir. Anderson stated that the plans will be sent to the Highway Department. Mir. Barrow stated that he felt having the service road plans finalised would probably help -the Bond isone and every attempt to have them ready by this time should be made. 071515671-6 701p7V The bill from Hodne Associates for wort: done to date on the University Avenue project was received. Mr.. Anderson stated that he would talk to Mr. Hodne some time this week and. give a recommendation to the Commission at their next meeting. Has 11 1 tt• III I ;H• t 14r. Anderson started that the letterhead had been ordered. • I1 • REPORT OF COMMITTEE, - JOHN 1,%NER, COMMITTEE OF ONE At the last meeting, Mr. John Meyer was appointed as a committee of one to assist Hodne Associates in drafting a letter to Mr. Roger Johnson concerning the additional narrative for the City Center Area. A copy of the letter was read, however as M-- Meyer wan not present at this meeting it was decided to table the.discussion until the next meeting when Mr. Mayer could give his recommendations. MISCELLANkIM Mr. Harrow asked Wyman Smith if there cams any legal reason why the Bond Issue could not be split so the people could vote on the three areas separately. Mr. Smith said he felt this could be done but the City Council would have to approve it. There was some discussion on the pros and cons of this idea and it was decided to consider this at a later date. At this point, Mayor Nee introduced Mr. Steve Hawrysh, a Fridley resident and developer in the area, to the Commission. Mr. Hawryah stated that he definitely is in favor of Urban Renewal and would like to help in any way possible. He farther stated that lie is interested in investing in some packages of land after they are cleared for redevelopment. He Trent on to say that he has been in this country for only five years. "Some • people don•t care what their City looks like as long as they don•t have to pay more tax ..... But to me the streets are paved with gold; this is the land of opportunity ..... I want to make it look nice ..... Whoever save the building permits for this stuff across the street should have his head examined; it should blow away." Chairman Herder told Mr. Hawrysh that he was very pleased that he is in favor of Urban Renewal and that they would be in contact with him in the near future. - APPROVAL OF STATEN= POEM. CITY The bill from the City of Fridley for administrative support was presented. After some discussion, it was decided that Mr. Anderson would look into the special Hodne study expenditures further and determine if it is an allowable project cost. NEW BUSINESS -- AM710RIZATION TO APPLY FOR MEMBERSHIP IN IU R0 Mr. Anderson requested permission to apply for membarship in NAHRO (National Association of Housing Redevelopment Officials). Fit stated that with the membership, one received a publication once a month that would be very helpful. They also offeref, a very extensive library on Urben Renewal publications, and a yearly meeting. Mr. Alberts said that he thought this membership would be very helpful and that the monthly publication was excellent. After some discussion, it was decided that Mr. Alberts would send some examples of the publication for review and the decision was postponed. 14ISCRLLANMUS Mr. Barrow asked if the bills should not be presented before the Commission at their mostings and be incorl- orated into the minutes of the meeting. Mr. Anderson stated that be did not think this necessary as all bills had been ap9roved by resolution at prior meetings except those for general office supplies. After some discussion, Mrs. Mullin made a motion that a list of the bills be prat on the agenda and attacbAd to the mi=tes of the meatfng. Mr. Burrow seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. As there was no further business, Mr. Kendall made as motion that the meeting be adjourned at 10:50 P.M. Mrs. Mullin seconded.. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Lois Mullin, Secretary Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority • Next meeting will be September 22, 1965 i LJ FRIDLEY HOUSING AND PEDXftLORGW AVMRMT tMOING - SEPTEMM 22, 1965 The meeting was celled to order at $:10 P.M. ROLL .. Present: Chairman Richard Herder, Commissioners Paul Barrow and John Meyer, and Rxecutive Director Allan Anderson. Legal Cowl Wyman Smith and Commissioners Loin Mullin and Robert Kendall arrived later. Visitors: Robert Christenson, Ray R= rington, Harold Callander, Irnest P. Powell, and Dave Alberta of Hodne Associates. Absent: None APPROVAL, OF MINUTES -- MATING OF SPPTW= 15. 196 Mr. Harrow made a motion that the minutes of the mating of September 15, 1965s and the list of checks attached be approved an read.. Mr. Meyer seconded. There being no nays, said motion carried unanimously. CaRfi?mNiCkTIONS LETTER FROM LFAME OF Wam VOTERS A letter from Mrs. R. Lee Jackson of the League of Women Voters of Fridley dated September 22, 1965, was read.. The letter stated that the discussion topic for the public meeting has been reworded to read. "Pros and Cons of the Urban Renewal Program". The Commission maked Mr. Anderson to check with Mrs. Jackson concarrning whether this will be restricted to Fridley or in Urb®n Renewal in general. Air. Mayer stated that he had accepted -their invitation to speak before this meeting. COMONICATIONS - MAYOR LASHKOWM In a telephone call from Mayor Laashkowi tsa, it was discovered that the Mayor of Fargo will not be abler to attend the Leagues of domes Voters* public meeting. Allen Anderson nested that the Mayor of Montevideo might poaeibly be con- tacted in this reed. Mr. Borcbard, Read of the Geography Department, University of Minnesota, was also mentioned an a possible speaker. r. After some discussion, Chairman Herder stated that if the League cant find another outside speaker, the Cossm:isss3ion would be 6ril .ing to .speak for the entire forty-five minutes. COMM NICATIONS - RECEIPTS k (kl URA Acknowledgment of the recmipt of the S & P Applications for Riverview and City Center waaa received from the URA, Housing and Home Fin&nce Agency, Chi.;ago. Page 2 Mr. Anderson wesenteA a copy of the Fidelity Bond and Wsrke 's Compeneation Policy receive. from Anderson In-zia ancc Company. Mr. Barrow read the letter of tr mitte-1 end stated -.bat he would look over the policies at a later time. ZaMM DMECTOR' S REFIT - JAYCEE TAU Mr. Anderson stated that he bad not been able to attend this meeting so Chairman • Herder had presented the tali. Chairman Herder reported that the meeting was at 6:00 P.M., I''uesdny, September 21, 1965. The opposition, Yx. T. Gnerre, was givers 15 minutes for his pre3ents tiara, and then Mr. Harder mms given 20 minutes, 5 minutes for rebuttal and 15 min "tes for his presentation. At this time, tae speaker: re dismissed so Fir. Herder lent. Harold. Callender stated that Mr. Herder had merely been dismissed from the proms arA he could have stayed for the rost of the meeting if he desired.. Imo. Herder replied that he uvz vz er the impression that he was to leave and he was sorry about the mis- understanding he ��ould have liked to stay for t1w rest of the maeting. Chair=n Herder then asked gam °. Callander what bad trampired at the meting after the dismissal. Tyr. Callsander° replied that the days had adopted a resolution and that letters would be tent to the newepaper, the City Council and the Mayor, and the Housing Authority stating the intent of the resolution. In effect, the resolution stated that the Jrqycees go on reword as being against Urban Renewal. Mr. Callander fzwther stated that a proposed addendum to the resolution disclosing the aunt of the vote hrmzd been defeated. Callander thought the vas about 25 nst e - . ? and 8 in ft or. Mr. Callander further disclosed that; Xv. Gnerre, after being disco s sad fraft the program, had reauged his position as a wmber of the Jaycees and had talked from the floor twin. Mr. B&vrow stated: tk t he thcught it' was pair; the speakers should both have been from the days or both been otxtsiders. Pte. Callender replied that Mr. • Gibbs had tried to get an outside speaker in opposition but had not been able ter. Mr. Guerre had therefore offered to speak. W SG 3 • Cbmirmin Herder stated tlWc he ,felt he had bean given his alloted time to speak and that he would welcomes another opportunity to talk before that Jaycesa. Mr. Callaandaa:r emphaasized that he was not speaking on b l if of the Jaye mm, but ww representing himself. Mr. Andersoin stated that he had received heplth inmwance information just a few minutes before the meeting and therefore had not had time to look over the proposed policies. Mr:. Barrow requested that the information be attached to the minutes. H23MIU D tai *S RM RT o S& P AFFvICATIONS Mr. Anderson Mated the he had sent a letter to the Jeyeeea giving them more material in connection with Urba . Renewal. The letter will be attached to the minutes. Mr. Anderson stated that the Service Road. Plans Wave been forwarded to the Highway Department. 'those plans are for the tbree proposed intersections. The City has taken no action as yet. .°4.. y 4 i . mss,. ?Y : ; �� !► 4. r i .7w Mx•. Meyer reported that ha, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Rodne, Mr. Alberta, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Harrington, mnd Mr. Zink bPA rwt on €ionday, September 20, to discuss all pros and comer of the poopo-ed detailed.- a -eative on the City Center doOMWntat on. Be stated that Mr. Jolt,zon is still picking the flowe out of than airs but that he will be marking an tin ho'asriy 4. , "31s and that is the =zimm he will charge. Yir. Me er read a. pamv-gLtaph from t1w letter sent to RorSer Johnson. "It is a requires t -Umt each ri=rmtive analysis of building deficiencies be explained and doemented in =f Ificl-ent detail that these findings Mould represent, your f'im 1-xofftsiozal jai ent and. therefore could ota nd the scrutiny r of othar eorchiteects and a ,iFlsers as well az opposing legal counsel. It will not be your rasponsibili.ty to deterai m. deter : the total effect of various deficiencies on each building. This decision will be made by others. The individu&. deficiencies Vaich you mote ;L.12old reflec t departs from acceptable bulldlyW coaditioas which could adveraely affect the health and safety of the public. The criteria for these conditions vi.11 be your beat professional judgz-�*nt." in 8% Paige 4 • He furthor stated that, after to ki.rag into consideration the viers of Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hodne, and Kr-. Binford, and being satisfied that the requested work could be done for a i. i of $4,500, he would reco-=ond that we go ashe&A and authorise the addi.tioa&l York a& scan as possible. After a. r discussion, Mr. Meyer made a, motion that a resolution be pwep ed to the effect of con- tracting s,tupple ntal work u=i.-Via Roger John3on accord. ing to this letter of 13 September 1955, &ad that try Director € abmit a request for 8"Plemont&l funds. 'Etwo motion revo seconded by Mir. Banrow. Upon a voice vote, therre being no xyapsys, said v,:)tion ,;&a I.-issed mrAmi ouoly. _ RZMT OF COMITIES - HODNE, CHUZGE Oil CITY STATE, Mr. Anderson artatesd that he had discuseed his charge for a special study on the Theicean Woperty wash lb--. Hodne, Gnd gam. He -daze felt -tae chexge should be part of the City 701 account. The discussion w tabled witi.l the nest wating. OLD BVSR S a HMO APPLICATTON Mr. Alberta brought copies of the magazine offered by the NAHRO for the Commission to revio r and min strossed thwt the Authority should join the 10M0 organia&tion. There was some discussion as to uhather ve could receive the mgasine without taming membership in this organization. Mr. Meyer- made a motion that we apply for wabership in the National Association of Housing Redevelopment Officials • and urged that we oxmine all of their literature and film strips as soon as possible to obtain inforwation rzior to 11oveaber 2, 1965. Mr. Kendall seconded the motion. A voice gore i-me called. Fir. Barrow voted no. Upon a =Jority rule, ti* notion carried. The bill from Hodne Associates for work to date on the University Avenue Project was received by the Ce iscion. Mr. Barrow questioned Mr. Alberta as to why the figures were higher thus the pxior contract. Mr. Alberta replied that some of the miscellaneous cerden had been voided and that these costs had been incorporated into the other erode numb-ors; y the total price was atill the ate. Aftor some discussion, Mr. Brxrow stated that her dial not like the idea of accepting a contract and then being billed differently. He firther stated that be wants An eXpl tion and Justification for the increase in the items. Mr. Meyer tkwn questioned Hr. Alberts as to Mr. Hodne's statement of work being 50% complete. Ha stated that he w-vuld like nos 1=of of thie statownt as has did not lid acceptir�T the state -at when they haws seen nothing tangible to prove the statemnt. It waa suggested that Mr. Hod re-submit the bill gi.vLngg a breakdown of the coats and an its zation of the work done. Mr. Alberts stated that this should be ray by the next aeoting. at 88 Pao 5 Chairwin $girder comwAnted that he had seen in the paper that a Citizens Comsitteee for Fridley Divaste r Redawlopwnt has been formed. qtr. ginsman is the Chaii_'°a9++ and Mr. Metcalf is the Sacretary Tr-eavurer. Mrs. Mullin stated that it was her understanding that the group planned to ccme to one of the meetings and intro - duce themselves to the Cowission formally. MISCELLANEOUS - TWIN Cifl 17MMUL As there Baas no furtber business, Mr. Barrow ode a motion that the meeting be adjourned. Mr. VAyer seconded and the motion g ood unanimously. The Commission and vioitors then retirad to see slides presented by Mr. Alberts depicting the Urban Renewal. Projects in Minneapolis. Respectfully submitted, Lois Mullin, Secretary Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority • ')C S9 C • Eoptemb#r 18, 1965 Dow Fridley Jaycees, In & very abort time y,)u will be asked to take & stand, for or against, Urban Renewal in Fridley. In *,l--dqr to objectively decide this important issue we mat first examine omvernl Item. in this & politict%l issue? Urban Renewal is an action tbAt in c(r_,cmw , y widk#- Ilrr* in Fridley, as in many other small cities this is the on-Ty i.sm kA than voters, and therefore, ow-h political party has chosen to W-k* a pxrtlsan Issue of it Is Vrb= Renewal rfieviod J_r, XPYI,dleyle UrVan renewal is a program designed to meet Um spacitto n�rpla of a cawwunity. Perhaps a be4ter naw would be a Community Devolopa*ml Projfgct; ov thnL�t wvtild not carry with it Its association of alum c1f4a-anc@,, tbr4t. hxa ?. in projtot "ess -4wre oluto do exist. The lwoj*cto contemplatod 0.1 ;xre to corroat pcwr and conflic-�- . land us*, vubstandar4 -bui_diiWm of tie disastm, we suffered in Lpril. am, DkV, or ttav Does Urbm Rrono�ril upon Fedeokl, suppor'O The answrr to this question is NOI After the b&M-c- qupptio3 of the n fox Urban Roneval is answered, the nOA-4-destion is, How c�,ri %* it. Tlim Housing Aathority and Woolf are in • support of Private yh,�vr�? (,en be e.,1.,ovn ttju� jx�ivato renemal will and can be acccmplished- "ph* pci,,oi10TV.'V vl.' a. priiralue roneval -X,)gr&% ik, vvry remote in Fridlot-y. -Pr ivwtv- in ispectml aple6nt sp-ots in the 1woject are" but tip ovor-ull caaty,,'ai, tc. "=",, ti,4*1y oovipl,,etion of the Projects. and to 11 of �t W* ha-va today from rocux,ring, is vv z; y is in this situation r3 *0 to do aa hw !;1,P ovwa:tl community &mplo p, .pw.)-at tbat W-"4, �,;o, bc-rre. o �.,naobllity of independent self I , � ort va � � ;a 0 Lffiatdt to onvision. It You a'sirf-e tt"� : us ii;, n of dp"_Iojtaunt and there is no concrete plazi. for a ti I cm rr q V th a A, tua t ion of +AAMInIng a, "V "'i The 'C' -1 t-kr of L YrA. of . gorwrao*zt, i 'l tbu caoe enter into a contract to pro4w,fdo a,PaA,YtPnoP to kl,arry out the program. Is thin Mywy F"' C, . v- Wo rw,�i Ft4der&l. �.ax: paye" pay billions of tax dol'"ta'" jXkV, j'r ' .", a il.l�,fl,,'!l,,,�,l�°"'Al�t;w"% Pnnda Ator moy uses ons of which is the Orinwn W. 1,rned. coal"L saT the !rojocta Fridl*y is four In 11 . "4 or thrmw million dollars. Tbo $968,40d) 110;,41 bonds n As a tax payer In 1pridll6y, . ""V, VY"', p �M"� ago tbo c-it4sena Of Fr i d vo e-' rt st'yk, )O'-"" This had an lap�Ae�t of -y taxes �Lw MUM, propert basf'O. ("000 ;u-'* a6kiner you to &pprov* a bor-A Jso-ae of �7i."A?, � �oizl d Lmpmrl t ixt a tax in- v� CrO891% of twiae thli! 'z" 7 -at, 1 .a r),%Lmy Vif»r y&&m at' kA zsrlaun swided Cost or 14 rjK-,r :Y*'VW" she he 10, 6.iftWC*1vr;O_ '111he oi.ty tall lx>nd is an ty. t ,,r6ar Ror*)mA bond to an e -p at of rogram iz that "Molnit AN rakftvs P.Io.T.Wnt takes II plac-o thi-, O/o greater than now) I t re"os by ;P� A inz To v3asumir It* as consider th* following. "W113 lb�,, dl 1 t ie eold? The anaver here is that the reds rolop urnt fva to ramove A11 Zho land from the tax rolls at any or 1'x owk Xill o-%mt*-rs c&uwt bo done in a short po r'4-d of T)o w 11, bg 9 r i! over a pe r iod of tw yemez wed a-z t1wU-i" w,411. 1h* roeold and developed. The Is car of tt* c1oovm-'3 4P, 11--tw JaqO ;d Oln 12 to 16 months, VMch 4-,' :',me � of An "'O land- standing vacant. Th@ Paer", 011., OV--- l nsol, of necwaAity, the flood and tornado dinvAiUr f oltv rA"acs 3O ct plemning aM must be done quickly. Urban H"nww vil I A,t shows an agrossiv* dynamic community, that is &%qro M.' problr%s and is making an attempt to solve them. 7SUSineSS (-,an A T4'a J-1 �,O tea' :, s, by oreatizg a Ventral Businase district that wAl R-110w OXPNY 410)q. 0,,i' activitios &rkd not screen future develop- Mont as ib now iaw C-azo,", • What dams Riverr'.-Ow 0=�4-A thud city today? The ta.-- revenue to the city from Riverview is about $,2,tbC,0 flo]"Aexs, the yearly Malntenance cost are over SIO,OUO. This pant yvar xw&rly c°�ollgxxv wore ar*nt in the flood. The question of park devolopment to 2.1.vor,Vle ' J.� bz7�-,�;fr, • examined. es the :)nly practi=l Use Of the cleared laad. ie no way of In-Otepoting tba Brea in a Mantler that JL would bL%.� econfmimly " Any one or raorp of tho Wroan Lai-no atudied could be dropped. without affect- ing the rew.Jzirg ;ms 1W.s, and if this were the c4wo -ate twoJect cost would be re- duced by the awunb of th" project. The decision to continue with the project &Z ,app vvreel 1P zlot Ums k�ards of the Housing Authority. We can only r000UaWn.d. SotDon 't- ,j�, I -t" tbay hr, final -va the - Judgo*nt regarding the antpriz into an, T,?' �,;k-,� lt*nd is-,ouv asEeo and lhhe City W1 directs us to continu*, uw-, -,dAU fhft-@ is no suprame powors available tot HOUSJn - rf.yt ka tt, Pmi* Uaird, and the Plarating I ara li.k k.o COMMISSio-n, Wt C&-n no Liv(tc t, The ram. far 1,1-!11e*,&1 ew*e not "nst on Vap question of available land for vamarcial nPA. -it Lh14,.4 If-rid t-,%wo,, situated so an to complownt the existing comas s.orcial property L" . 1 tSr-.-rip not bo as g�ea;t a mtt*d for redevelopment. Our problw, Is the p,-vz ord in a4r wzlsting co=wrcial area and the loss of ;v.)tAvrAtial. xf-,t,, obould lair. is An i f It were di,;velopod along Bounder Ths., aNwcation of 'he Rotu-,! luthorities Funds h,-./,3 been raised. What have • we done with our $133,0`0 &6-rar .J. Arnaing? We )mr* only advanced 1/2 of that total or $68,000. We have spent $27,101-05 to datfo (Si�Ptevlbo,r 15,), Thle has been mainly to provide the planning 've t Owk" :V: ty. Any Onp-, V, ObAmg to blxt""' s P. 4"Vid, MU'l aoccyont#"d ffm- t"-? 41 =i Federal �i_'A 4 lakll�. j( - raj 1 40 tho - ntjx* COO-I" of QlY -' Onv*g= ent I eas an aud,:iJ,Uig %,,P' vIZ -'*11 to ilA.' in Add "tong, tha 1 _vly o f _rvP'te4._n &U, Studios. Ampe and C" �' 4,' y � � , M -A, virst tboat questiorAt A& 3 n z � -, .� '7M), 4001k.T . , 'J5,_ - If 3.) Ts tbw!.C.i* ',h bvject? 2) Do you 4b J; fitip woiild asx'ry (wt a to .1 Ust bkpvAl�f*�2,lt tkw city and bl't 'A 'vmie. oth*r fi'�Otors il"� th.Me R, Should we enter intro s Vedc*rally Kided Projec.-t? This ap• proaa seems to �A Ut?, was -k likely or** tbzt will assure complete pAxeirsed; devololmont in a 6hort (4 ®5 Year) tire period and will stLviibste ovz-wroial grout z&ud devolopwnt. The 1wivary, difft fl ty- �xith prl"nit'a dAVOIGIvezit of the, Univer. Gity area peoJoic';t la tk�Zjt in no gp4jgfjv'-tory way to combin� tbo oongIrv**vst.Ii.w. of s7ak&',,LI 'lets? Azif�ting in that &rea now iAtt'-� .1sRtpN*r pf,,M4�?Iz nsatisfactary for tb* present Y*W18 of COMWrOW, Wid interePts. Lars ,".. eve be co-nde=ied and re; areel"A"a4d ism ly vina &r a Podernlly sN-.w ored. ren��waa pm- gr R'O.rflly�4r vnag (.'-'i'y i:wan-oill ce=ol aAewrn that the propos&d prajct axv!�--v'.j W"I'j '11v ro-tuilt tn v4caovAAn(,e vith a cartfully .IA . od mrw4te-r pinn_ Th*V cm= only iWIM, tba'� iDlv'lding ccdov. ITMA='t C*dOx t'o en-0-xvkic-s, NJy tho ho . Ang and '-p- _VIA; 4th m vaster plan. For nxrttwr I, I o_<- writ@ to t"_ vi- 16z,4.1 Univorsity Ave=*, N.E. 560-3450, Rxt. 40, Allan E. Andwrson Exocutivo Dixector, FridIty Rousing Rodmwjopmt Authority 91 • September 27, 1965 M E M 0 TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager FROM: Marvin C. Brunsell, Finance Director SUBJECT: Special Assessments, Lots 1 through 30, Block 10, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville - Scared. Heart of Jesus Polish Catholic Church The Scared Heart of Jesus Polish Catholic Church has requested. an abatement of the assessments for water and sewer laterals on their cemetery property or a trade for an easement on the south side of their property, with the understanding that the assessments would then be deleted. There are several things that come to mind on this question. 1. The disadvantage of trading the assessments for the easement, would be that the street project for which the easement would be obtained would not reflect the cost of this easement, and . it would, therefore, not be included in the assessment for the street project. I would, therefore, think it would be more desirable to purchase the easement outright, if there is to be an easement taken, and the cost could then be recovered when the assessment is spread for the street project. 2. If there is to be an outright abatement of the assessment without any consideration of whether or not an easement is obtained, it would bring up the matter of precedence. Up to this time no City, or Church,or School, property has been left off an assessment roll, if the improvement did affect them. The other point is, that if the Church were interested in Iaving the assessment deleted., they should have appeared at the hearing and the rate could then have been increased. on the other properties so that the City would. not be out this amount of money. As it was, the rate for this improvement is about half of what the average sewer and water assessment runs, and the rate could very well have been increased. at that time and. it would not have been out of line. is .ti 2 I .)IJ - HALL, SMITH, HEDLUND, DUSTER, FORSBERG AND FEIKEMA .w( ATTORNEYS AT LAW • '° " 'TAIL September 30, 1965 '211 PRODUCE BANK ■UILOINC w ",O- ;Mirth GE:O RGE HEDLUND MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 53403 - LEONARD T. JUSTER >131•1451 TF'.ONIA!; G. FORSBERO HENRY H. FEIKEMA Orr1Oc■ IN: RONALD L. HASKVITZ Congo COON RAPION Mr. Nasim Qureshi City Engineer City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Re: Barred Heart of Jesus Catholio Parrish Dear Mr. Qureshit On Pages 67 and 68 of the Agenda of September 20, 1965, there was under consideration that improvement of the road on 54th • Avenue between 5th Street and 6th Street. This matter was further before the Council because of the letter from the • Sacred Heart of Jesus Catholic Parrish on page 62 of the Sams Dagenda. This matter was referred to the administration for review and handling. Mr. Ward Gronfield, a Columbia Heights attorney, appeared in behalf of this Polish Catholic Church. He stated that the first burial was in 1914; that there are now-200 graves in the cemetery; that half of the street has been fenced in and used for some period of time; and that there is at least one grave presently existing in the street. He proposed that if the city wanted to use the full width of the street, that the fence and retaining wall be reconstructed on the cemetery prop- erty at the city's expense and that the city cancel all special assessments on the cemetery property. I have had a chance to visit with Mr. Gronfield on the phone j twice and know something more of his position. He admits that the street was dedicated and that no private party can acquire a public easement by prescription. This is the way that an ordinary private person acquires a right to cross over someone else's land if he does it for 15 years without being stopped. However, on the other hand, Mr. Gronfield claims that the city'' is esto ed from now demand the road. He bases this PP �►8 theory r, principally on a case that came to the Supreme Court from a �_ ��. Ai �::.� x- 3, ..ir. st•..t -.. I7� ,. 31:'. .',E', . -. —t r...�:.. • i .2. "'Mr. Nasim Qureshi September 30, 1965 c94 situation in Rochester, Minnesota, about 25 years ago. For 85, years, the city had not used a dedicated street and allowed ' :business buildings to exist on the street. They then tried to have the buildings removed; the court refused. The Court said the citf and its predecessor had abandoned the use of the street and collected taxes from the building and permitted theca to exist for -more than 85 years and juLtice and equity would estop the city from now taking possession. The Cemetery Association is not in as good a situation as the property owner was in the Rochester case. Factors involving knowledge onj:the °part of the city; the period of use bg_ra++— — - -- -T cemetery, etc. These are questions that we would have to be in- volved with. A trade can atilt be made for full use of the street providing we remove the fence; we slope the ground and see that that's main- tained; and that we release the cemetery of all special assess- ments for water, sanitary sever and storm sever, but they are agreeable to pay street assessments. Yours truly, Wyman Smith. W5 /rac cca. Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 Universitv Avenue Northamat T=-L- -t 7574 N.E. 5th STREET; Fridley, Minn; Seot. 27,1965 Fridley City Council,. Fridley, Minn. The lateral sewer assessment on my residence at the above address ;;11582.75 is to me totally unrealistic,unjuat and inegpitable. "_'.e lot Frontage is such that it cannot be used for another residence. "l- incongruity of this assessment is that,to my knowledge no one pays a i filer assessment and no one is less able to pay, as I am retired on a very :sited income. rife and I are elderlty� we are the only residents here , we are away ho;te a lot, so I am sure no one has less use of the saver than we. v_c = of five hundred Jolla :-s of this assessment ,seems to me to be a "i; ure to make it realistic and just. 1V ase let me know what11 do about this injdlstice. 7 Sincerely, 95 • September 30, 1965 M E M 0 TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager FROM: Marvin'C. Brunsell, Finance Director SUBJECT: Sewer and. Water Lateral Assessments - Lot 1, Block 1, Osborne Manor - 7574 - 5th Street I have checked the assessments for the property in question and it is true that the sewer lateral assessment as originally levied. in 1962 was $1,582.75. It is also true that this is a rather large amount. The lot in question is a rather large lot, having an area of approximately 15,800 feet and a frontage of 120 feet. It is also true that the rate for sewer lateral assessment in the whole north end of the City was higher than average. I do not know of any concession that could be made to this one IC • property owner without making the same concession to the whole north end of the City, and. if this is done the difference then would have to be made up by a tax levy on the people, so that they wouldn't really be saving anything anyway. The matter is further complicated by the fact that this assessment was levied three years ago, and of course, many assessments are paid in full and so on since that time. The property owner apparently feels that special assessments.are set in the same way that property values are, which of course, is not the case. There is no provision under the law for adjusting special assessments for the economic status of the benefited property owner } either, as far as I know. n U I _!V HODNE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS /PLANNERS 1320% Fourth Street Southeast Minneapolis Minnesota 55414 331 -8813 ''P .i;, ,Vztion _ei ,, Earl Wagner City Manager thily *rsity Avenue Service Roads GLA "Crlarneno Pu,. suant to the necessity of decisions regarding the above subject, we present thw following recommendations for your consideration: I ; Acc t and put into action the Service Road concept along University I venue where applicable. ao The State Highway Department design engineers and district enginee s have very explicitly encouraged and applauded this approach (sea attached letter) as sound traffic engineering. b� Your planning consultants, Hodne Associates. believe emphat- ically that the recommendations are valid with or without a formal urban renewal project. It is our recommendation that sound land planning principles are involved and should be followed by the Planning Commission and City Council in their overall community planning effort. 2.1 Immediately put into effect the service road policy at intersections that are being developed and are presently vacant. a. 57th Avenue SW° Holiday developers accepted without hesitation the service road setback criteria presented them. SEe The function of the proposed service station and the traffic movement could be improved immensely. NE,. Similar to the SE intersections NW.; Street presently ample distance from intersection, 0 • a<, �° i �tissi a Avenue. Im 4 October 1965 NEB This presently vacant corner needs the service road connection prior to a development being accepted oo as to best meet the traffic conditions and work with the adjacent neighborhood. Each service road intersection (part or whole) can function independently without the total system (it would also be desirable to have the total system at some later data). 3.. Work toward action on the remainder of the service road intersections ,.where development now exists but staged so as not to harm the existing businesses until zuch time relocation can be smoothly accomplished. In atm,=,,ary, we recommend that the City Council act upon this matter at the presently vacant and near developing corners in dispatch as the opportunity will not be available again in the foreseeable future. Also, it should be repew,,ed that it is our opinion that regardless of the disposition of the renewal isame,, this is a sound planning step for the benefit of the overall community to facilitate ease of accessibility to and from the neighborhoods, shopping areas, and cater community facilities. • Respectfully submitted, HODNE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS /PLANNERS Thomas H. Hodne, ALA. Assoc, AIP THH-. jlk Enclosures: Highway Department Letter Intersection Maps 0 �Jlfs:. is Ii October 1$ 1965 Fridley F ousing aria Rcdevelo- o it AuthoritZr 6441 University Avenue 11.E. l ridley, Minnesota Attention: Allan d:o Anderson Executive Director in reply rcfe.r to: 315 S.P. 0205 (T .E . 47 ) Deer i.r. Anderson: On September 17, 1965 you furni s! %od us t-rith prints of the pro;owed detached frontage roues as three intersections in Fridley. We have revie-wed tij.L :~ front -i�-- roads and consider them excellent choices to tr,f is coneeated areas at r 57z Avonue, 51 Jt Aver_uc and +7 z'c at. Our concern in this matter _V -a a,.z.roval of building permits by the Fridley L- :3.arain - Co ...J- ,'iLion and Council which conflict with the proir ,se d' clay _ I'x c nta. :: roads at 57tb Avenue N.E. 'de propose to r.'.i cu;:: this goon with the city a officials. Thank you, Er. Anderson, or :'ortu in rentedying these critical traffic intera,-:ctions. Sincerely, MI. Braun Dejputy Distric c Fnineb cc: Thomas Hodne • cis Azus t#mwal and Public UtilIUSS • 6534 tbwagb 6773 LlqtkW • 7857 throuO 7892 97 F STI S TO UE APPROVED BY IVS [x M N" ` L .:: t7CTOMM 4o 1965 Karl. Ded.olph Conatruation COR3any 771 West. Seventh street Stn Pawl, Minnesota Estimate #3 w Water tKpcovement Project No. 75-B (Booster station w 63rd Avenue N.R. & T.H. #65) (Partial) $ 20670.75 Comstock & Davis, Inc. Consulting Engineers i446 County Road "J" Fort Furnishing of Profess3ioaal Minneapolis, Ulzmesota 55432 Engineering Services for Planning: Estimate #2 - storm sew Vgpacovessnent Project No. 71 (T.H. #47, north of Mississippi Strut) and sanitary sewer uprovemmnt Project No. 72 (T.H. #47, north of Mississippi street) $ 645424 C. S. McCrossan, Incsxrporated Route #2, Box 322 088008 Minnesota Estimate #4 - Street XMPrOVSWAnt Project No. ST. 1965 -1 (1965 Municipal Program) (Partial) $ 10 ®384018 Estimate 04 a- street 1wrovement Project Non ST, 1965 -2 (1965 state Aid Program) (Partial) $ 360176.99 1 c js c39 MEMO TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager MEMO FROM: Nasim Qureshi, City Engineer MEMO DATE: September 28, 1965 NUMBER: " #65 -61 RE: Payments to Debris Clean Up.Contractors The following is a list of invoices submitted by different clearing contractors to date: Invoice Number Contractor Equipment Amt 1207 Carlson -La Vine, Inc. Crane w /operator • Tractor w /operator $2,676.61 36702 Truck Crane Service Co. 30 Ton Truck Crane Rubber Tired Loader Tractor & Trailer Dump $2,087.75 36'(" Truck Crane Service Co. Tractor & Trailer Dump 146.88 '- -Walter R. Freeman HG 9 Cat Loader $1,224.00 Walter R. Freeman HG 9 Cat Loader 306.00 TOTAL $6,441.24 If the form and type of invoice is satisfactory to you, and it is Council's wish to pay these costs, then these bills can be paid as the hours have been checked and O.K.'d by the Public Works Department. NASIM QURESHI, P.E. City Engineer o o t.4 �-e,4 CLCcc� eu -7., el-pf �:Tyl o?31 Av�J. �� p6s 101 LIST OF CONTRACTORS LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL OCTOBER 4, 1965 ELECTRICAL North Side Electric Company llo9 west Broadway Minneapolis, Minnesota bye Jo E. Stumpfa RENEWAL OAS SERVICES Ace Heating Coq=W 8000 Clinton Avenue South Bloomington 20, Minnesota bye Eric B. Holland REM IAL GENERAL CONTRACTORS Adams Construction ComtpaW, Inc. 2837 Girard Avenue South' Minneapolis 8, Minnesota bye George M, Kelly NEW B i I Builders 5727 XF= Avenue North BmItUin Center, Minnesota bye James Bowman NEW Bream there Construction Co. 90 3$t Street N.E. • FridLleb : Minnesota bye Roger C. Brsm y A. A. Har4y & Associates, Inc. 6W Riverview Law Minneapolis 301, Mirawsots bye R. Be Sandia NEW J & J Associates, Inc. 9309 lyndille Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota bye Jeffred W. Leighton l�T Garth Jenson Compow 1385 Se Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota bye Garth K. Jensen NEST Henry P. Korman 1028 - 37th Avows N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota bye Henry P. Norman NL T Kenneth J. Platt ' 7001 West 01d Shakopee Road Minneapolis 31, Minnesota bye Kenneth J. Platt NB1+T HEATING Ace Beating C 8000 Clinton Avenue South • Bloomington 20, Minnesota bye Eric B. Holland RSNEi+1AL LIST OF CONTRACTORS LICENSES TO BE APPROV0 BY COUNCIL Page 2 OCTOBER 4* 1965 MASONRY Roger Sorensen Construction Car. 1,522 Sargent Avenue St. Paul 5, Minnesota by: Roger Sorensen NEW PLUMBING Carlson Plumbing Company 10143 - 3rd Avenue South Minneapolis 20, Minnesota by: Lealle T. Carlson NEW H. Bo-Stone Plumbing Com;xW 2101 went, 67th Street Richfield, Mirnnesot& bys H. B. Stone RENTAL n 7 ,.0 a,iC" Signorafters Outdoor Display Co. 836 - 40th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis 21, Minnesota by: James J. Stafford Jack J. LmwavAw l�T Of HER LICENSES MULTIPLE DWELLING Nam and Address Address of Apt. Bldg.. Units Gloria Schleiss 5800 - 4th Street N.S. Fridley, Minnesota 5800 - 4th Street N.E. 4 James & Janeet Rudnitski. 6035 Main Street N.E. Fridley, Minnesota CIGARETTE LICENSE Ims Standard Service Station Mry. #65 & Osborne Road N.E. Fridley# Minnesota SERVICE STATION Ise Standard Service Station Huy. #65 & Osborne Road N.E. Fridley,, Minnesota , 6035 Main street.N.Ba by: Lester Sahaffran by: Lmster schaffran T 1 E11 Too UNMOW $10.00 0.10.00 102 BID NUTICE CITY OF FRID Mir MINNESOTA Tile City Ca umil of the city of Fridley,, yimesotaa, will accept bids ©m construction of tennis courts on the 18th day of October until 12.00 o'clock Noon on said date at the City Halls 6431 University Avenue N.E,, t, Fridley, M innasota,, 55421 (Tel; 560-3450). All bids must meet the mini requirements of the specifications. Failure to camply with this section can result in disqualification of the bide Each bid shall he accompanied 'by a Certified Check,, Cashier's Check or Cash in an amount of uot less than 57. of the bid, which check shall be forfeited if bidder neglects or refuses to enter into a Contract, after his bid has been accepted. The City reserves the right to accept the bid which is determined to be in the best interests of the City and to reject any and all bids and waive any informalities Aar~ technicalities iu any bid. The City Council also reserves . the right to consider such factors as performance, experiences responsibility of the bidder, past per - formance of similar types of construction, equipment or materials, and other similar factors that it may dete=ine to be in the best interest of the City. Copies of the specifications may be examined in the office of the City Engineer. All bids must be submitted in sealed envelopes and plainly Marked on the outside with "Tennis Courts Bid!% Publish; October 6, 1965 October 13, 1965 EM P. WAGNER City Manager 103 • �J 101 ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the City of-* Fridley and the City of Columbia Heights simultaneous with a contract of even date and conberning a cooperative arrangement between said munici- palities for the construction; financing and maintenance df a storm sewer system across Trunk Highway X47 and to a 45th'Avenue outfall. And pur,- suant to said Agreement, the City of Fridley is about to enter into certain contracts with construction contractors and each of the parties are bound by separate cooperative agreements with the State of Minnesota, and the City of Columbia Heights has agreed to furnish certain funds to pay for said construction; NOW THEREFORE, it is further agreed between the parties that the. City of Columbia Heights shall deposit in a separate account in its name. at its depository, namely the Columbia'Heights State Bank, a deposit to be known and identified as the "City of Columbia Heights Storm Sewer Account on City of Fridley Storm Sewer Project Number 12 ". That all earn ings and income from said account shall belong absolutely to the City of Columbia Heights. That the City of G,olumbia Heights, through its authorized agent, may withdraw funds from said account for the purpose of investing in government .securities.::oThat::seturities so obtained shall be designated and kept by the bank as a part of the Escrow. that the funds shall be withdrawn from said account upon the joint order of the City of Columbia Heights and the City of Fridley. CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS J BY% _- - - -1 . N- V 16 POIM" -T r`OR WXSEOW lTTI) "'P OVt :, B*T °x'M Cis COUNCIL - SOBER 4, 1965 n am 22UA= Abu= m1ma Jamey Blair Benedict Fnllt4 $2.65 Jos 4407 Morgan Avenue North Bartender per Tr 7wAn Minneapolis, Minnesota Bar #2 hour ($ f fectivs 9/16/65) 0 0 NOTICE OF HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that a hearing will be held by the Commissioner of Highways of the State of Minnesota, in Room 818 at the Highway Department Building on the Capitol grounds, St. Paul, Minnesota, on the 20th day • of October at 10:00 A.M. on and with respect to the modification and revision by the Commissioner of Highways of the "Rules and Regulations for State -Aid Operations" to be adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chap- ter 162 and Acts Amendatory thereto. Said hearing will be held and this notice is given pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1961, Section 15.0412. Dated at St. Paul, Minnesota this 7th day of September 1965. o ssioner of Highways �1 L� 107 108 BNGINSBBING D�EPA�AIT 0 City of Fridley, Minn. September 30, 1965 C. S. McCrossan „Incorporated Route 2. Bwc 322 08800,0 Minn. Re: Street Improvement Project St. 1965 -2 (MUP No. 27- 307 -02, 27- 312 -03, 27- 311 -02, 27- 301 -02) Chasoe Order #1 /�� rrrririr.r nrr ■... i Gentleman: You are hereby ordered, authorized and instructed to add to or deduct, as rioted, from your Contract for Street Improvesrnt Project St. 1965 -2 (YAW No. 27- 307 -02, 27- 312 -03, 27- 311 -02, 27- 301 -02) the follow- ing street improvements based on the following estimated quantities for a net total Additional Lump Sum Price of Seven Thousand, Three Hundred Twenty -Two and No One Hundredths Oallass-- •- •------- • - - - - -- $7,322.00. The above Lump Sum Price shall be adjusted by any additions to or deletions from the approximate quantities by the Contract or agreed • upon unit prices noted; other incidental items shall be compensated for at Contract amount bid prices. A. 7TH- STPJMT :. , 53RD TO MISSISSIPPI STBS_T #'27- 312 -03) Q, ADDITIONS■ ...■.■�w.r■�.r 355 Sq:. Yds. W Bitum somas for Driveway @ $2.00 /Sq. Yd. 48 In. Din. Tree Removal @ $2.50 /In. Dfa. 232 Lin. Ft. Concrete Curb removal @ $1.00 /Lin.. Ft. 316 Lin. Ft. 12” R.C.P. @ $5.60 /Lin.Ft.' 258 Lin. Ft, 18" R.C.P. @ $6.90 /tin. gto 192 Lin. Ft. 21" R.C.t. 1@ $7.91 hin. Ft. 112 Lin. Ft. 24" R.C.P. @ $9.09./Lln.Ft: 4'Mwl 24" R.C:P. 7Y° Bend @$43.38 /Each Submitted and approved by City Engineer Nasim Qureshi, P.S. on this 30th day of September, 1965. HUM QHBBSHI, P.S. City Engineer Approved and accepted this Approved and accepted this day of day of October, 1965 by C. S. October, 1965 by the City Council of Fridley, luftossan, Inc. MinnsBota. B _ By Title -_....._....�,w.." Mayor 8....w._�.._.....w.__ City Manager 10 9 St1GI2G DB�'AR1t�NT - City of Fridley, Minn. September 30, 1965 C.. 8. Mecrossan, Incorporated Route 2, Box 322 Osseo, Mien. Re.: Street Improvemeaat Project St. 1965 -i _Clue Ordsr 72o. 2 Gentlement You are hereby ordered, autboriaed and instructed to add to or deduct as noted from your contract for street Upprevemant Project St. 1965 -1 the following street Improvements based on the following estimated quantities for a net total Additional Lump SuM Price of Three Thousand Four Hundred Thirty -Four and Eighty One Hundredths Dollars ------ �...rr.. wrrrr, wrrrrrrrwrrr- 1. rrrrrwrwr�rrwrr• rrrrrwwrwrrrrrwrrr•rr$3,434.80. The above Lump Sum Price shall be adjusted by nay additions to or deletions from. the approximate quantities by the contract or agreed upon unit prices noted: other incidental items shall be compensated for • at contract amount bid prices. ADDITIONS r rrr�.rrr 150 Lin.Ft. Conevete Curb Removal @ $1.00 /Lin. Ft. 225 Lin.Ft. 8" C.M.P. Per with Hock bed and select backfill @ $14.40 /Lin.Ft. 8 Lin.Ft. 12" C.M.P. @ $5.60 /Lin.Ft.. Submitted and approved by City gineer Nast= Qureshi, P.B. on this 30th day of September, 1%5. USIM QUA, P.B. City Engineer Approved and accepted this Approved and accepted this _ day day of October, 1965 by C. S. of October, 1965 by the City Coil of McCrosean, Inc. Fridley, Bien. . By_.,,,.,.rr.,,,., _.,..._..., By Title VAyor 89 Cite Manager RESOLUTION NO,, L17- 1:365 E A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOT 14 (PARCEL 900), AUDITOR'S SUBS #92. WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided, NOM, WHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, as follows That the assessment levied against the following described parcels, to -wit- Lot 14 (Parcel 900', Auditor's Sub. #92, may and shall be apportioned and divided as follows- Original Parcel Fund Lot 14, Parcel 900 Reg. S.A. Fund (W&SM, St) Auditor, Sub, #92 SW 48B Sewer Lat. (I Service) SW 48B Water Lat. (i Service) Division of Parcel Approved Fund Lot 14, Parcel 900 Auditor's Sub, #92 C] N-53' of the W. 165' of Lot 14 Auditor's Sub. #92 Rego S.A. Fund (W&SM,, St) SW 48B Sewer Lat (l Service) SW 48B dater Lat (i Service) Reg, S.A. Fund (W&SM, St) SW 48B Sewer Lateral SW 48B Water Lateral Original Amount $ 4��©3(0�022 1 p488065 $2,608.99- 2, 0 e 9 Original Amount ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF 711E CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1965 ATTEST- CITY CLERK b Marvin Co Brunsell • $ 292.05 1,075.78 505-91 138°17 412°87 183.91 $2,608069 14AYOR - William J. Nee 10 t 0 RESOLUTION NO, 1-7 _/4 1965 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOTS I - 7, BLOCK 2, INCLUDING Ea OF ALLEY VACATED, PARCEL 260, OAK GROVE ADDITION, WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, as follows.- That the assessment levied against the following described parcel, to-wit: Lots 1 -7, Parcel 260, Block 2, Oak Grove Addition, may and shall be apportioned and divided as follows: Original Parcel Lots 1 -7, Inc. Ej of vacated alley, parcel 260, Stock 2, Oak grove Add. Division of Parcel Aparoved Fu. d Reg. SW SW 26 (3 services) Fund Lots 20 & Ej of vacated alley Reg. SW Parcel 200, Bik 2, Oak Grove SW 26 (no services) Lots 4 -7 8 Ej of vacated alley Reg. SW Parcel 230, Bik 2, Oak Grove SW 26 (3 services) Original, Amount $ 294.17 3,824.16 $4,118.33 Original ginal Amount $ 98.06 1,117.60 196.11 2,706.56 Lot i Incl. Ef of vacated alley, Parcel 260, Blk 2, Oak Grove Add. -- -- $4,118.33 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEYY THIS DAY OF 1965. ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell MAYOR - William J. Nee ill 112 zX1*%ACr OF M114UTKS OF MEEaNG OF ftlE C1'rY COUNCIL OF A REGULAR MEETING IICILD OCTOBER 4, 1965, AT 8:00 F�°CLOCK, P.M,,. AT THE CITY HALL, CITY OF • FRIDLEY;, AaNNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Fridley, vlinnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Monday, the 4th day of October, 1965 at 8:00 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: and the following were absent: eee eon �' The Clerk announced that the proposed assessment for 1965 • WATSR & SE;WgR MAINS, I.AIBRAiS & SERVICE CONN13CTIONS had been fled in his office on the 7th day of September, 1965, and that notice of hearing on said assessment to be held 'at the regular meeting of the Council on the 4th day of October, 1965, had been given in the form and manner as provided by law, The Clerk presented an affidavit shw Ang publication of such notice in the official newspaper, which affidavit was examined and found satisfactory and ordered placed on file. The Mayor announced that the sleeting was open for consideration df objections to the assessment heretofore filed with the City Clerk for 1965 WA'MR $ SHM MAINS, LATERALS AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS (SCWMZ A) The Clerk reported that written objections had been filed by the following persons affecting the following described lots, pieces, • or parcels of land. to-wit: Page 2 113 A OF OBJECTOR DESCRIPTION �OBJECTION • The following persons ware then heard and presented their objections to said assessment: NAME OF OBJECIM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION After due consideration of all said objections, Councilman ,may, introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR 1965 WATER & SEWER MAINS, LATER ;LS 3e SERVICE CONNECTIONS (SMIEDULE A) BE IT RESOLVED By the pity Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota as follows: . to The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the 1965 WATER h SEWER MAINS, LATERALS It SERVICE CONNECTIONS (SC1ISMM A) in said City against every assessible lot, piece or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece or parcel of.land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same, 2. Notice has been duly published as required by lair that this.Couneil would meet 'in special session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3, Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing has bean open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item, thereof, and no objections have been filed; except 11 ao The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces or parcels of land ennumarated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the 1965 WATER & SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AIM SERVICE CONNECTIONS (SCRE)ULE A) in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot. piece or parcel of land,; and that said amount so net out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces or parcels of land therein described. 6. 'Such proposed assessment as altered, modified and corrected is affirmed adopted and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed, assessment as altered. modified and corrected, with the changes and a "terations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted and confirmed as this proper special assessment for each of said lots, pieces or parcels of land respectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted and confirmed shall be certified to b,i the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for • 1965 W. %TOR & SEWER MAINS, LATERALS AND SERVICE CONNSCT%oNS (SCIMDULE A) 8. The amovtnts assessed against each lot, piece or parcel of land shall tear interest from-the date hersof until the same have been paid at the rate of six per cent (6%).per annum, 9. Such assessment shall be payable in fifteen annual installments payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1965, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such iwp +kid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on theist day of January in each year. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilman and upon vote being taken thereon the following voted in favor ther**: CJ 114_ Page: 4. 11. . and the following voted against the Sam 411EREUPON SAID RESOLUPI(xd WAS DECLARED DULY PIMED AND ADOPTED AY Tjr[ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF FRIDLEY, THIS DAY OF 19650 • AVEST: CI1Y CLERK ® Marvin Co Brunsell :7 MAYOR William Jo Nee ..� CITY IMILWER = Earl Po Wagner �S RESOLUTION NO,�) • RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVE IT AND FINAL PLANS AIM SPECIFICATIONS: WATER, SANITARY SEWSB, STORM SBWSR PROJECT N0. 73-B WHEREAS, Resolution #175 -1965 of the City Council adopted the 20th day of September, 1965, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as specifically noted in the Plotice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A ", and WISREAS, all of the property,owners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of the improvements (as noted in said notice) were given ten (10) days notice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property owners heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution #175 -1965 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible to -wit: a. All of the improvements as noted in the notice of • hearing on the same as are noted (in Exhibit "A ") in said notice except • That the work above may be consolidated with other areas as one improvement. 2. The work to be performed under this project may be per- formed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids. 3. Comstock and Davis, Inc., Consulting Engineers, are hereby designated as the Engineers for this improveoent. They shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TH s DAY OF , 1965. ATTEST: Marvin C. Brunsell, CITY CLERK William J. Nee - MAYOR 11G 117 RESOLUTION xo� • A RESOLUTION CERTUYXKG CHARGES TO THE COMM AUDITOR TO BE LEVIED AGAINST CERTAIN PROPERT7ZS FOR COLIACTION WM THE TAXES PAYABLE IN 1%6 WHEREAS, a nuisance condition has been found to exist on Lot 110 Block 22, Hyde Park Addition. and Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block W, Riweaviev 11eights Addition, and Notts 18 & 20, Block 2, Oak Gee Addition, and Lot 199 Block 29 Oak GTowe Addition, and . TNEREAS, the ow asr of such ptrvpe ,'r 'was Ewen notice to amts 609..4 nuisance` end _ WEEIRAS z the omner of such property did not abate such nuisance and Rine City of Fridley, under aauthov_ i of Ssction 145.23 MUmesota State Statute of 1953 did thevefors abate the nuisance at a total cost of $385.00 NOW9 THEREFORE BE 1T RESOLVED, that the , Citt y Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify to the County Auditor for collection with the tuxes payable in 1966, the charges as lasted below*- Lest 11, Block 22, Hyde Park Additions 'tore down structure & filled in foundation $140v00 Lots.2D i, and 4. Block "W1, Riverview Heigbts Addition Cleaning up - dwelling destroyed $135.00 Lots 18 and 20; Block 2, Oak Grcwe Addition Lot xy, m-riCw ig Wk. Crowe Addition Cleaned up these lots 4110.00 TOTAL $385000 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COM CIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1965 a CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell MAiOR - W111140- J. le -0 a' I owned by G. 1 Soranson, 4615 Universi•, ''Ave. No. 2 is owned by the County of Anoka - I 3 i August 60 1964 r Yr. Walter Freemen a; 895 Mississippi F =: Minneapolis, . Minnesota p~ Dear Mir. Freeman; � You are hereby requested to abate the following public health nuisances: ! M. No. 1 Lots 18 and 20,, 31. 2p' Oak Grove Adn. Please h clean and clear these tots of all debris and refuse. f' No. 2 D Lot 19, 01. 2, Oak Crove Adn, Please clean and clear of all debris and refuseF'` These lots are in an area bounded by 66th and 67th Sts.$ ; and Fridley and Anoka Sts. The Buildin, Inspector can assist you in locating them correctly. �Nen you have co:rrplated the iaork to the `satisfaction l of this Board you may submit o q q your bill to the City Clerk as Provided for in 1953 Minnesota Statutes, 245.23. Very';,'1trulq yours James He Hensley -_ City of Fridley Board ,of. Health , cc: Marvin Brunsell ,i% Earl Wagner r 4 � r 1201 4 i 1 July 31 1966 i { Yr. Walter fteo an 895 Yississippi Aoinneapolis, Minnesota ,. You are hereby requested to abate the following{ public health nuisance* 511 Dover Street (Lots , 3! and 4, dock Itz"s - • Riverview Jieights Adn.). Please remove the dilapidated dwelling on this property: When you have e6mpliWe -4 the wtoA to the satisfaction F of this Board you may submit your bill to the City Clark_aa provided for in 1953 Minnesota Statutes, 145.23. Vf3► truly yowrs James N.. Hensley City of Fridley Board -6f Roalth act Marvin Brunsell Carl Wage 4 0 • 121 RESOUTUCH NO. 1965 A RESOLi8T1ON CERTXFYING CMRGZS 'TO THE COI = AUDITOR TO BE LEVIED AGUNST CERTAIN PROPERTIES Fri COLLECTION WITH THE TAXES PAYABLE IN 1966 WHEREAS, a nuisance condition has been found to exist at Lot 30'0 Block 4, Oak Grate Addition , and WHEREAS, the *must of such property vas given notice to abate such nuisance. and WHEREAS. the ateur of such property did not abate such nuisance and the City of Fridley, under authority of Section 145.23 Minnesota State Statute of 1953 did theoefore abate the nuisance at a total cost of $5.00. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, chat the City Clerk is hereby a:itborized and directed to certify to the County Auditor for collection with the taxes payable in 1466, the charges as listed �loev: Lot 30, Block 4, Oak Grave Addition Towing charges $540 TOTAL PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY CO1=1L OF THE CYTY OF FRIDLSY THIS DAT OF , 1965. ATTEST: CITY CLBSK - Marvin C. Brunsell MAYOR - William J. Nee SUNSET 4-7470122 Cit Cy of gr i ilecy ANOKA COUNTY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE MINNEAPOLIS 21, MINNESOTA August 27, 1965 Shorty's Tow Service 401 Mississippi Street Fridley, Minnesota Dear Sir: Will you please tow to your storage lot the junk'car existing on the premises of 6587 • Arthur St. N. E. , When you have completed the work to the satisfaction of this Board you may submit your bill to the City Clerk as provided for in 1953 Minnesota Statutes, 145.23. Very truly yours, f 9je J 4a�Fi��`� � 1 ' C ty of Fridley Board of Health cc: City Manager Marvin C. Brunsell, Clerk i • , 12 3 RESOLUTION # A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO ENTER INTO A WRITTEN AGREEMENT OR AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS AND CONCERN- ING THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM ACROSS TRUNK HIGHWAY #47 AND THE 45TH.AVENUE OUT -FALL OF SAID STORM SEWER. WHEREAS, the administrative staff of the City of Fridley, together. with the staff of the City of Columbia Heights have prepared a written agree- ment together with a supplemental agreement concerning the expenditure, con- ~ struction, and maintenance of the storm sewer project running from Columbia Heights through the City of Fridley, across Trunk Highway #47, and utilizing an out -fall on 45th Avenue; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE City of Fridley enter into said agreement and supplemental agreement with the City of Columbia Heights and involving,the construction, financing and maintenance an&.repair of the storm sewer project used by the two cities and running across Trunk Highway #47 to the 45th Avenue out -fall. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that`the Mayor and Manager be, and hereby are, authorized to execute said agreements in behalf of the City. ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1965. ATTEST: Marvin J. Brunsell, Clerk William J. Nee, Mayor • RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, By the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof on October 4, 1%5, SECTION _l: That on the 2nd day of November, 1965, there shall be a City Election for the purpose of voting on the following; ELECTION OF: Mayor Councilman -at -Large SECTION 2: That the polling places for said election shall be as follosro: Ward 1, Precinct 1 Ward 1, Precinct 2 Ward 1, Precinct 3 Ward 2, Precinct 1 Ward 2, Precinct 2 Ward 3, Precinct 1 Ward 3, Precinct 2 Ward 3, Precinct 3 Veterans of Foreign Wars Fridley Methodist Church Riverwood School Sr. High School Rice Creek School City Fall Parkrieu School Reserve Supply Co. SECTION 3: That the polling places Will be open from 7:00 A.M- to 8 :00 P-M- • SECTION 4: That the following people are hereby appointed to act as judges. for said election except that the City Clerk-is hereby authorised to appoint qualified substitutes in cases of conflict or interest as set forth in Chapter 4, Section 4005 of the City Charter. WARD 1 - PRECINCT 1 1,088 Registered Voters - 7 judges each shift WARD I - PRECINCT 2 1,283 Registered Voters - 8 judges each shift • 124. 125 iWARD 1 - PRFCYNCT 3 1.312 Registered Voters - 8 judges each shift WARD 2 - PRECINCT 1 1,343 Registered Voters - 8 judges each shift, • WARD 2 - PRECg� 2 1,892 Registered Voters - 12 ,judges each shift WARD 3 - PRECINCT 1 1,289 Registered Voters - 8 judges each shift • L� WARD 3 - PRECINCT 2 1,369 Regiattvad Voters - 9 judge's each shift WARD 3 - PRECINCT 3 922 Registered Voters - 6 judges each shift SECTION 5: That the following judges are appointed to act as cbairzon of the Election Board for the precincts designated and shall hawe the duties as set forth in Section 203023 of Minnesota Statute*. Waved 1, Precinct 1 Ward 1, Precinct 2 Warr$ It Precinct 3 Ward 2, Precinct 1 Ward 2, Precinct 2 Ward 3, Precinct 1 Ward 3, Precinct 2 Ward 3Q Precinct 3 SECTION $: Compensation for said judges will be paid at the sate of $1.50 pas hour for'the regular judges and $2400 for ebairmen of the Blection Board. ]PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS TR DAY OF s 1965. ATTEST CITY CLERK - Margin Co Bsnnseli MAYOR - William Jo Nee 1`( 127 1965 EL9=0N ZMEL • WARD 1 PRECINCT 1 Dom Mrs, Donna Marcucci 7441 Lyric Law 784 -3643 Mrs, Della Sampson 7574 5th St. NE 784 -3898 Mrs. Shirley Godesa 375 76th Ave, NS 784 -5033 Mrs. Mary Miller 7350 Lyric Lana 784 -8459 Mrs, Jacqueum Bavy 7370 Malody Lame 786.3287 Mrs. Ronald Randall 7399 Lyric Lazo 784-4972 Mrs. (hies Omarman 7395 Able Street 784 -5862 Mrs* Howard Schalts 7331 Tempo Terrace. 784 -0899 Mrs, Jas'lui, . Devries 7410 Tempo Terrace 784 -1124 ' Mrse Helen Fowler 7425 Bacon Drive 784+1521 ' Mrs. Helen Bourgeois 1483 Onondaga St. 784 -6051 DD A Mrs, Mary Schreiner 685I Oakley Drive 560 -3045 Mrs, Harriet Men 601 Rice Creek Terrace 560 -1956 Mrs. Joyce McClelI= 6749 &ensastou Drina 560-1560 . Mrs. Dorothy Houck 750 Overton Drive 560 -3249 Mrs. Beverly Fussy 684 0 Oakley Drive 560.365 Mrs. Anita Roche tard 971 Pandora Drive 560.3365 Mrs, Marlene'Sundbosm 6815 Washington Street S60 -3122 Mrs. Elaine Bweth 6566 Brookvitew Drive 560 -1518 Mrs, Ithalia Smsnsaa 6550 Oakley Drive 560 -2916 Mrs* Doris hard 6805 Washington Ste 560 -3196 Mrs, Hasel Anderson 6411 Able St. 560 -2417 Mrs. QeMVe BAnastt 6710 Jackson Ste 560 -2116 WARD 1 :4RBCU= 3 D2 P L Mrs. Collette Bourdsauz 8115 Bast River Road 764 -7545 Mrs, Mildred! Kaiser 6765 Bast River Road 784 -7769 Mrs, Lillian Nagler 6815 Bast River Road 784.5684 Mrs. Michael ftxyk 280 Rice Crook Blvd. 784 -5688 Mrs. 1"m Hnbley 286 Rice Crook Blvd. 786-4444 F Mrs, Madonna Jobasao 560 8airamtt Ste 784 -7465 Mrs. Gloria oo 511 sly Street 786 -2208 Mrs* Walter Sake 574 Dover Street 784°6941 ' Mr, Burton Bllis 115 Tal=dge Way 784 -f895 • Mrs, Bleanev Paulson 335 Ironton St* 7190 Riverview lkrraoe 784 -7565 788 -0604 Mrs. Betty Scott Mrs. Marlene Doty 59 Logan Pkwro 784 -7893 1965 BOW N,NUDOS WARD 2 - PRECINCT 1 Dg F. L. 128 Page 2 Mrs. Lee Mondloh 6281 Van Buren Ste 560-2048 Mrs. Frances McLaughlin 728 63rd Ave. 560 -2007 Mrs. Maxine Mondloh 6320 Monroe St. 560-2607 Mrs. Janice Hebiesen 901 W. Moore Lake Dr. 560-3606 Mrs. Adeline Haidls 5714 W, Moore Lake Dr. 788 -6342 %me Shirley Pitala 560 63rd Ave, 560 -1546 Mrse Kesel Anderson 6411 Able Street 560.2417 wee Jane Barnette 6435 Jackson St, 560 -1000 Mrs. Milady Saunders 500 63rd Ste 560 -1937 Mr. Harry Naxrocki 5800 We Moore Lake Dr. 5606633 Mrs. Carol Toveen 6321 7th St. 560 -1687 WARD 2 - PSBCINCT 2 6281 Trinity Drp SWUM Dg Fa L Betty Robert6ca 6131 Sunrise; Dr, i Mrae Jeannette Anmoek 1310 Hiilerest 788 -395% Mrs. Sylvia Gilltlnd 1032 Hickman Circle 788 6057 Mrs. • Leoma Peterson 1568 Gardena 788 5402 Mrs. Edith Evans 5501 Regis Drive 788 -7669 Mrs, Adeline Swanson 5835 Central Ave, 788 -7638 Mrs* Joyce Corm+all 5933 Backman 788 -1562 Mrs. Eileen Freeman 6125 Woody Lana 784-8034 Mrs. Margeari.ts idikowski 5920 Stinson Blvd,, 768-6330 Mrs. Ethel Grassini 1631 Rice Crook Rd. 7848394 Mrs. Judith Dreshar 1655 Mississippi Std 7841656 Mrs Douglas Whits 5211 Fillmoro St, 788 -8763 Mrsl. Lucille Western 5222 Pierce Ste 788 -8"1 Mr, Kenneth Soria 6051 Benjamin $to N8 788 -8403 Mrs. Rose Jasper 6279 Balder Ste 560 -1365 was Edna Hiaytski 1330 Hilleresi Dr. 788 -7876 - WAM 3..... OEM 1 D Mrs, Everette Heale 6281 Trinity Drp SWUM Mrs. Betty Robert6ca 6131 Sunrise; Dr, 5606-1118 Mrs. Rosella mar 6121 Sunrise Drp $60 -1318 Mrs*" Joamae McGregor 6230 Rainbow Dr, 3604959 Mr. David Chasten 118 63rd Way 560 -2033 Mrso Joan Welber 158 6A Way NE $604658 UM* Zsaur FISINd 6710 MAM S60 -3589 Woo Class Massnik 6101 Rainbow Dr. 560 -1178 we, Barbara ®ohsan 151 662nd Way 560.1364 Mrs. Dona Mae Odland 124 Riversedge Way 560.3182 Page 3 0 1`9 1965 LLECT. XMM ELECT. • WARD 3 ® PRSCWCT T Mrs, Lois Rawson 5972 6th St, 560-1574 Mrs. Am Detwe 5960 6th St. 5601155 ` Mrsa Jean Johason 136 Horison Circle 560`5257 Mrs. Margaret: Maller 148 Horizon Circle 560.5486 Mrs. &Award Bansacat 5641 4th Ste 5604734 Mrs. Grace 8s!sgda 5385 Horizon Dr, 560.4506 Mrs s Mary TART Lens 5917 Sth 3t. 560425{! Mesa Betty SkjMold 5419 4th Ste 560.4809 Mrs. Christina Patterson 400 57th Place 560 -1224 Mrs, Donna Carlson 6020 6th Ste M 5603215 . o ARD 3 Mrs. Helen Tvaysnfols 5248 Horizon Dar. 56(65907 Mrs', Jean Phslan 113 Gibraltar load 560»5725 Mrs., Vera Gaax"ki 4668 2nd 8t. 788.0976 Mrs. Margaret Mwak 112 Panorama Ave. 560.•5416 Mrs. Regina Merkw+ovd 137 49th Ave. 5605032 Mve Edward Fitzpatrick 5273 Horizon Dr. 5605318 Mr. 'Fester Hangertord 5085 Topper Lane 56004846 Mrs. Pearl Sandstrom 4856 Ird St, 7887509 Mrs, Betty Nelson 5129 Horizon-Drp 5606.SS89 Mrs. Donna Root 4749 2nd Sto NS 7885729 0 1`9 WARD 1 - BRRCINGT 1 Go 04 p, Mrs. Dan Roberg Mrs. George Norton Mr. Ins siverte Mrso A.' Be Jette Mr. Charus Hervey Mrs. Bart F*IU*th Mrso.Marilyn Hanna ' Mrs. Janice Pettit m1RD 1 - PRECINCT 2 00 02 1 P Mrs. Warren Oisao Mrs. Doris. 1"Limm Mrs- J0000 "ri Mrs. Battey Lstssst Mrs, Williams is"" woo R. J. tuft Mrs. teens Chase Mrs, Willi" Hsngstler Woo Don Htickatb+orn Mrs. B. G. Black Mrs, Bradley Harrison Mrs. Carol Lnedars Mrs. Mary Sarr WARD 1 - jBjg= 9 goO.P Mrs. Rod ward Mrs. John parry Mrs: Mabel Hot'ftamt Mrs. Allis Syi=k Mrs, aoyaa 8dW dt Mt7: Betty Jo 8ebssdsks Mra. Wimtis T'onom Mrs. Pat Lester Mrs. Movie Lmm am. Bwiyn seliaski Mrse Tad Brek Mrs. • Iris Reiser Mrs. Clarsaoe Mitchell Page 4 130 .1965 ELECTION MMS 7850 Melody Law 786 -2285 1251 Norton Ave.• 784 -2482 6851 Central Awe 784 -8267 1501 75th Aft. 784-4749 1249 Onondaga 786 -4196 1621 Onondago 784 -" 7565 Able 8t. 78%*W5 7301 Unbersity 766 -1373 SW Ries Creak Terrace 560.2297 6731 Madison St. 56041426 585 Rids Creak Terrace 560 -1752 6720 Monroe 8t: 560 -1656 589 Rios Croak "Torraca 560.2260 371 66th Ave& 56045260 494 Rics Creek Tarraos 560 -2113 840 Pandora Drive $60 -3229 730 Dios Creek Terrace 560.1766 389 Rios Creek Tarraee 560 -2792 434 Rice Creek 9krraee $60 -1931 6831 Oakley St., 560.2945 942 Rico Creek Terrace 5604605 6949 Hickory Drive 789 -2969 7885 Pearson Way 784 -iT46 6900 Hickory Drive 7.0695 6755 Bost River Road 786 -1468 6925 hickory Drive 784 -7550 6901 Bast River Rd. 784 4182 6912 Hickory Driers 784 -38Sd 6909 Hickory Drive 784-6164 6922 Hickory Drive 784 -8130 218 69th Plana 784 -7542 115 Glen Creek Road 784••6406 124 Glen Creek Road 7844*71 6917 Hickory Drive 7�4 -4982 131 Bags S 1965 ELECTION JUDOS WARD 2 - MMCT 1 Mrs. Verletta Fouler 561 54th Ave 564.5434 Mrs. D. J.'Gabrialson 856 63rd Ave 560.1616 Mrs. Harold Jansen 570 57th Ave 788 -7239 Mrs. Dale Hadtrath 567S Quincy 8t. 788 -3103 Mrs. Betty Ritter 6401 Jackson 3t. 560.2237 Mrs . Don Mns i 6310 Van Buren St, 560 4346 Mr. Gerald Adams 6301 Monroe 3t. 560.3757 Mr. Norlan Les 644 63rd Ave 560 -2276 Mrs. Marlys Wollm 761 58th Ave 788*8460 We Calvin UsSbtrg 665 59th Ave 7884695 Mrs. W. Be aim 630 Nth Ave 788 -.x/77 Mrs. Rita Peres 609 Bstmatt Drive S60 -3650 Mrs. Marvel Peterson 6424 Taylor St. 568.3876 WARD 2 - BRBCiNaT 2 Go RIO Pe Mrse Riahard Kinsman 1548 Hiilctest Drive 788+0764 Mrs. George saoon 1336 Hiller"t Drive 788 -SW Mrs. Jar" - chutson 6845 Mm ml Road 7048966 Mrs. Betty jobsb1z"d 5801 Tamnis0n Driers 788-7120 Mrs® Janice DrigaAa 1060 Lynde Drive 788 -1930 Mrs. Margaret Enndsos 1322 Hiilarast Drive 788-5137 Mr, Tom Coebr m 1171 Lyade Drive 788••3547 Mrs, Sylvia Marrs 1338 Hilleftst Drive 5604600 Mrs. LeRoy Bushey 6899 Chamsl Road 784.9686 Mrs, Helen Cbanotte 5922 Haeksam Ave 788 -7278 Mrs. Joanne $Lea 5802 Hackman Aver►, 788 -588 Mrs. Ray Uarriogton 1561 Fetadals Ave 788 -3439 Mrs. mtily. Loran 465 Mississippi St. 560.2233 WARD 3 m PElSCINGT i a- a- „Pa. Mrs. SAvia Beetbot 6261 Rainbow Drive 5603365 Mrs. Donna MeftAn S 6100 a fm Drive 560 -16" Moo Elmer Jobmsm 6490 East River Road 560-1630 Mrs. 8. R. Basland 225 Mareary Drtwo, 5603260 , woo ,'hme 801WPLst 6161 Trinity Driest 560 -3167 Mrs. Evelyn stow 60 1lississippi Way 5603879 Mrs, William Bradley 134 63% Way 5601309 Mrs, Stmest Powell 6241 Raise Drive 5601109 Was Carol Jacobean 6230 6th 8t. 5606.1294 Mrs. Ray Williams 6150 sunrise Drive 5604711 0 1965 STZCTION JUDOS WARD 3 - PRECINCT 2 Q :. Page 6 Mrs. Laurence Anderson 5336 Altura Road 560.43►i9 Mrs. Ethelyn Nelson 5807 2�1 St. 5604915 Mrs. Elsie Baker 5941 4th Stn $60 -3601 Mrs. Jobs Qerard 5973 6th Ste 560 -10ft Mrs, Ronald Whittomb 5916 4th Ste 560 -2387 Mrs., C,"maiae Wolsleld 157 Cram Road 23A St. Mrs. Ins Rnissing 6021 6th Ste 560 -2915 Mrs. Richard LovIiien 5933 4th Ste 560-2364 Mr. $ogler Harstad 5430 7th Ste 560 -4321 Mrs. Janice Brtider 5973 4th Ste 5604032 Mrs. Vera" Peterson 5313 Horisoo Drive 560 -5819 me. Value Pf 3224 Diasoad 8 Tuvace Apt. 103 788 -0050 5916 5973 5th Ste 560 -23W WARD 3 - PRBQI= 3 GO-.04PP� Mrs- Claire Handersom 213 49th Ave, 560`4906 Mrs.. Kathleen Eastras 4875 211 Ste 7886180 We Paul Peterson 4620 2nd Ste 788 -2226 Mrs. Jam Jackson 4851 23A St. 7884446 irks. t yrtla B�:mm 4647 21S 'St. ' 786 -6496 Mrs. Dome Novak 4769 219 Ste 560-6164 Mrs. Bluer Zu®eeh $134 Harisom Drive 560:4613 Mrso Ronald Vhiteomb 5916 4th Ste 560 -23W CIA- WARD Z.= WT i E 1965 SLECIIal�1 Jt1DC�S AL'�BNA1S3 XARD I EEG= Mrse Fern cbmw 6750 Madison Ste Inde Mree Eva Matsak 6717 3dfersaa Ste %td* Mrs* Mary Brem SIM Ruth Circle rode r D 2 1 .,� • Mrse Violet Jant 536 34th Avs. Xmi. Mrs. Betty Alfredum 6290 Van Bustin IWO Mrs, Ramona Slglar 771 SSth Avee Ind* Mrs. Grace Lndwig 3744 We Moose We Dv*lad. WARD 2 IN=- IM-22 Mrs. Lois "alia 1233 Hathaway Lama lode Mrs* Gram mebuy 3601 Csotral Aaae lode WARD 3 17A MiCT 1 Mrs. Marl Haas 195 Satellite Lana lode Mn. Mull 'Oreig(after °65) 221 Rice Ore Thm* IrA K] �.l Page 7 �` w. 560.3168 3.1375 786.1823 360.5309 36044 788 -6434 7883209 78809lS 788••7773 360.8811 3604016 • I1 OU. - NDMI TO THK CITY COUNCIL SEAS at the regularly scheduled meeting of the Fridley Housing and RedeveloprAnt Authority on 29 September 1965 the question of the forth- coming Mond issue was raised on the floor, and the Authority after ldangtby debate on the question of tether the Authority should recommend the issuance of a single bond in the amount of $968,101 or whether the Mond issue be broken down into the three (j) *operate issuegand voted upon separately by the public at the general election on November 2, 1965, and 1+HEPMS the projects are known to have separate identities and are independently qualified and stand on their own merits, the Authority on a motion by Paul Bavrou and seconded by Robert Kendall, passed on a voice vote of Four to one the deconding vote being mAe by John Beyer, to RECOMMM that the City Council consider the placewnt of three separate bond issues before the votars at the City of Fridley General Election of November 2, 1965. ATfiffiT: Loin Mullin 0 Richard J. Harder 13,3 RESOLUTION # A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DIRECTING THAT A SPECIAL BALLOT BE PLACED BEFORE THE VOTERS AT THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY ON NOVEMBER 2ND, 1965, RELATIVE TO GETTING'AUTHORIZATION'•TO,ZSSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION • BONDS IN CONNECTION WITH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. WHEREAS, the H oVsing and Redevelop nt Authority of Fridley, Minnesota, has requested`^,a-.City Council ubmit to the voters of the City at the next general` election, namely No P,rsi,Pr_t9h5- a— Tiailot on `tlte question of whether the City of Fridley be authorized u eral o gation on s connec on w t var ous housing and redeve opment , p or jectss- and -- � 1 I WHEREAS, it does appear that there- are'three separate projects involving disaster applications; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the City Clerk be directed and authorized to prepare ballots and publish notice of election for the general election of November 2, 1965, in the City of Fridley, Minnesota, on the following questions: Shall the City of Fridley be authorized to issue its General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $380,357.00 to provide funds for parks, playgrounds, recreational, community, education, water, sewer and drainage facilities, or -any other works which it is otherwise empowered to undertake, to be furnished adjacent to or in connection with a housing and re- • development project for City Center Project? Yes No Shall the City of Fridley be authorized to issue its General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $311,050.00 to provide funds for parks, playgrounds, recreational, community,, education, water, sewer and drainage facilities, or any other works which it is otherwise empowered to undertake, to be furnished adjacent to or in connection with a housing and re- development project for University Avenue Project? Yes No Shall the City of Fridley be authorized to.issue its General Obligation Bonds in an amount nctt to exceed $276,694.00 to provide funds for parks, playgrounds, recreational, community,. education, water, sewer and drainage facilities, or any other works which it is otherwise empowered to undertake, to be furnished adjacent to or in connection with a housing and re- development project for Riverview Project? Yes No ADOPTED THIS day of , 1965. William J. Nee, Mayor ATTEST: Marvin J. Brunsell, City Clerk • 0 0 NOTICE OF ELECTION CITY OF FRIDLKY OFFICIAL E ps HOUSING AND REDEVELOMENT PROJECTS ANON COUNTY, MI -MSOTA TUESDAY, NOVEMBSR 2, 1965 CITY CENTER PROJECT Shall the City of Fridley be authorized to issue its General Obligation Bonds in as amount not to exceed $380,357000 to provide funds for parks, playgrounds, recreational, comouaity, education, water, sewer and drainage facilities, or any other works which it is otherwise empowered to undertake, to be furnished adjacent to or in connections with a housing and re. development project for City Center Project? Yes NO UNIVERSITY AVENUE PROTECT Shall the City of Fridley be authorized to issue its General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $311,050000 to provide funds for parks, playgrounds, recreational, community, education, water, sewer and drainage facilities, or any other works which it is otherwise empowered to undertake, to be furnished adjacent to, or in connection with a housing and re- development project for University Avenue Project? Yes No RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS PROJECT Shall the City of Fridley be authorized to issue its General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed 0276,694.00 to provide funds for parks, playgrounds, recreatimal, community, education, water, sewer and drainage facilities, or any other works which it is otherwise empowered to undertake, to be furnished adjacent to or in connection with a housing and re- development project for Riverview Project? Yes No Publish: October 6, 13, 1965 CITY CLERK - Marvin Co Brunsell 18 0 RESOLUTION ;,09 A RESOLUTION CI RIMING CERTAIN DELINQUMT WAVi,R AND S,,IIER CHARGZS TO TIM COUB Y AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION 1-11M THE 1965 TAXES qjBv,t ^AS' certain grater and sewer charges for the City of Fridley are delinquenk in pavzaent, and, T,mREA5, Section 7 of Ordinanece Number 113s Section 1.02 of the City Charter provides for certifying delinquent charges to the County . Auditor for collection frith the taxes* 11MY, THEREFORE, 13E IT R33 01M) that the City Clerk is horeby authorized and directed to certify the following charges to the County Auditor for collection vrith 1965 taxes due and payable• in the year 1966 to -nits All those noted in Schedule ItAti attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference* PASS:U ANll ADOPTED THIS DAY OF _�A 1965 BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY 07 7 , Aid COliI1TY,- ►'+• • Uff A - %;r'T P. Wagner ATTEST: ITY CLERK a TfUASURER C. MOM 1�3E� 13'7 40 22SOLU'MOR 80. A YJMLMZM fB— —rn a us mmssITY OF mw PROVIMO FOR A TAX MY = RMSS DF NQML CITY CBA M TAX UNIT W IT XUMVXD, by the. Council of the City of Fridley as followas I - if M 1L That the Council of the City of Fridley heretofore received from the City Manager a proposed budget of the City of Fridley for the year of 1%6 Which proposed budget when examined evidenced the necessity of an additional tax levy in samess of the City 0"Cter 11mits mad, acowdingly, there was then a8apted on the 16th day of August, 1965, a resolution declaring the nec- essity for an additional tax levy and specifying the purpose for WhIds such additional tax levy is required. Fa MMS the Council proceeded to hold public hearings pur- suant to three (3) weeks published notice in the official newspapear of the City. That such public hearing was held on the 7th day of septesber, 1965, and all persons interested therein were afforded an opportunity to be heard and flake objections, if any there be, to the budget as then proposed. That after such hearing and after full discussions 'of the contents of the budget and all objections thereto the Council further proceeded to correct and amend the budget in such way as was deemed necessary by the Council. to be in the best interests of the Cityr and a£-ter such corrections and. its the Council did pass and adopt by Ordinanci on the 4th day of octcber, a► budget for the City of Fridley for the operation of its business during the year 1966, a copy of which budget to attached hereto for reference purposes as MMISIT "A ". SlgTIo, tea: Farther p upon the exULination of such budget aaciginally Promo coarr+eetecl and wed and adopted by the City of Fridley on the 4th day of Octobers 1965; it reasonably appears, and the Contrail does now find that the tax :Levy necessary to provide taonies for the operations of the business of the City of Fridley during the year of 1966 unsder said budget, is and will be, when computed in accordance with law# in excess of the normal City Charter limit of thirty (30) trills on each dollar of the assessed valuation of the property in the City, but that, nevertheless, it is reasonable and to the best interest of the City its order to provide for the proper operation of the busaicess and functions of the City during the year of 1966a to. exceed such normal City Charter tax levy limit, and to • bevy taxes thereof sufficient to provide the monies necessary to the operation of the business of the City in accordance with esld budget. 138 MSODUTIOU 1101 (Continued ) . SSCTION 3z That to provide money in accordance with the needs and purposes of the budgat o:: the City for the year o:: 19GG taxse shall be levied ID accordance with law sufficient to provide monies in the following amounts and for the following purposes, and no part or portion of &V monies provided for any purpose herein shall be app- ropriated to and used for any other purpose, except as might other- wise be authorised by lade either under the general lair of the States of Minnesota or the City Charter of Fridley. $497a356.00 For the General Funnel $ 148 735 000 or 1 Kill For Fires en ° s Relief $ 34 0 638.00 For Debt Service - Parks $ 190830.00 Fat Contribution to Public Employe as Retsr 'd Fund $ 530235,00 For Debt Service Fund - Iovamsnt Bonds 22 n Z,�60,00 For Dot Service Fund - Civic Center sw�ds $6420044.00 ADOPTED AIM PASSED BY THE COMCIL OF THR CITY OF FRIMW THIS DAY OF 0 1965. ATTESTt CITY CL=x - Marvin C. Brunsell • ltA M - William J. Nee RESOLUTION 80, A RSSOLOTXCM CERTIFYING TAX LEVY RBQU -n— NTB FOR 1966 TO C AX= OF AMC" FOR CO a an IT RRSOLVRD. that the City of Fridley certify to the Cowry Auditor of the Cowaty of Anoka, State of Minnesota, the follaWiaq tax levy t6 be levied in 1966. General Fund Debt Service - Parka Cantributian to PaR.R.A. Debt Service Fund - Improvement Sands Debt Service Fund - Civic Center Bonds Firamen•a Relief $497,356.00 $ 34*638*00 $ 19,820.00 $ 53,235.00 $ 22,260.00 1 mill BE IT FURTMR RRSOLVRD, that the amount herein Certified with sespecst to the Public Employees Retirement Association is in the amount required by lava ADOPTSD BY TUN CITr COUNCIL OF TNR CITY OF F'RIDLEY MIS DAY OF # 1965 AMST % CITY CLERK - MArvin C. Brunsell n U !;!iwM, - William J. Dies 133 0 0 1� RESOLLMON r� USOL UON APPMING MMCUTTCN CS AUNT 54803 WITH: THE MMMSOTA HIGHWAY DEPARMUT EX IT 8ESO1MM that the City enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Highways for the following purposes, to -Wits to provide for payment by the City of Fridley of part of the cost of a at*= sever system to be constructed by the State on Trunk Highway No. 47 in accordance with State plans designated as State Project No. 2726 -27 and 0208- 18.(Agreement No. 54803) BE IT FOSTMR RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager be and they hereby are authorized to execute such agreement. State of Minnesota Co Ulty of Anoka City of Fridley I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and coreect copy of resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley at a duly authorized meeting thereof held one the day Of. 19 a as shown by the minutes of ;Z Meting In my possession. City C1er 140 0 r1EM0 T0: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City Council MEMO FROM: Nasim Qureshi, City Engineer i'CMO DATE: October 4, 1965 r'EMO NUMBER: #65 -64 RE: Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and Street Improvements in Melody Manor 3rd and 4th Addition The above improvements were checked by Les Chesney, Superintendent of Public Works, and Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant. . They report that all utilities improvement are satisfactory except the manhole approximately 100 feet South of Lyric Lane on Jackson Street has sunk about 5" and also there is a need of minor repair to some catch basins and manholes. Darrel Clark estimated the cost of this work will be about $1200. Some assurance should be asked from the developer that the repair work will be completed as soon as possible. As lar as street improvements are concerned, the seal coating of streets is not done yet, but the developer has submitted a bond running to City of Fridley to cover this work. If it is City Council's wishes to accept these improvements, then they can take an official action to do so. The City of Fridley has an agreement with E & M Development Company and Sandstrom and Hafner Construction Company for Melody Manor Subdivision in regard to the maintenance of the improvement for a year. If it is satisfactory to the City Council, then the maintenance time can start from the above mentioned date. NASIM QURESHI, P.E. City Engineer CITY OF' FRIDLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT Monthly Report m August, 1965 Cleared or This Moo To Date This is 1, o: This Yr. Unfounded Pending Lases t Yr_ Last Yr 0014PLA INTS ADM Domestic 11 68 68 12 80 Assault 1 10 9 1 2 9 Drunk 4 4 1 4 Diso, Conduct 7 25 23 2 1 24 L11, Laws 5 5 5 Firearms 2 5 4 1. 1 1 Res, Arrest Other 13 114 103 11 27 241 JUUVVM na Assault 2 7 4 3 3 Diso, Conduct 14 38 35 3 Liq, Laws 5 19 19 5 16 Firearms 3 5 3 2 2 2 Runaway 2 36 36 1 13 Vandalism 22 92 46 46 26 145 Other 14 89 84 5 14 122 Robbery 1 2 1 1 2 Burglary 7 51 15 36 9 61 Theft Over $50 Under $50 2 130 28 102 13 85 198 76 122 27 171 Other 42 274 229 45 64 408 MOTOR VEHICLE Mile Gas M�P.G�. Ex ense $ Unit #24 29589 299.0 8.6 78,95 .0 0 Unit #25 2,485 295.4 8.4 122 ®38 .0 ?9 Unit #26 4,920 547.2 8.9 196.58 .039 • Unit x`29 3,021 333.5 9.0 100.65 .033 This month To date ACCIDENTS TY; ins M_o�. This Year Last Year Last Year Personal InJ. 14 131 14 _ 119 Property Damage 19 185 18 140 Fatal 1 1 RADIO CALLS 439 2a 321 2 75 2#446 ASSISTANCE TO Motorlets 35 329 40 239 Other P. D. 15 64 8 88 Fire Dept.. 12 3 33 Radical 7 92 11 141 TRAFFIC ARRESTS Speed 34 213 49 298 D.U.I. 18 3 40 Open Bottle 1 7 1 18 Careless Driving 4 34 1 78 Reckless Driving DA Susp or Rev 3 20 6 31 DA other 3 33 6 67 Signs & Signals 7 66 19 Parking 17 89 19 63 Other 6 151 11 139 D.O,.Me TESTS Ours 2 1 21 Others 2 1 24 JAIL 4..L Our Prisoners 19 -183 22 206 Other Prisoners 8 88 19 131 N O R T H E R N STATES P O W E R C O M P A N Y MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 September 13, 1965 Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Minneapolis 21, Minnesota 1 -6,000 Lumen Overhead Lamp Installed 9/1/65 Madison St. N.E. & 58th Ave. No. `1 jER /PMCA:jmh Yours very truly, J. E. Rudolph, Sx1perVisor Municipal Services Outlot I Don0a Addition Q-1-i n 508 4135.12 2 1 Blackmar Addition SI 122.80 17 1 Spring Valley 1 113 19042.62 18 1 Spring Valley 1 125 1914000 19 1 Spring Valley 1 125 1040.30 16 2 (Parcel U+10) Spring Valley i I, m9.60 TOTAIS: 10 2895 249793.30 Cost: Sewer Service - $1,9222.30 &.10 Services =4122.80 per service Sewer lateral: Total Cost — $23)575863 Cost of Crossing at Rice Greek Road (Outlot 19 Don's Add,)-Coubinad with lateral Charge Cost of Crossing - 6,600 3, of Rice Greek Road (Lot 178 Aud, Sub, #88) - Combined with lateral Charge Sewer Lateral Lift . $238575045 40 M5 $8,14 per foot Plus Share of Hain Lim QIV-1 Q klit, 58 rind on A.Itsmats ""J Lin e, 2 MAt�-- :v v, 11"L81,00 'j 8 2320) AuIft:,,r 19018,20 ,9 7 *,�20 099.60 Z., 1 -20 %L,099.60 213 udito v'I 244,.20 2 Auditor.',s 14ub,, 117 138 29613-64 'fi? (R-,rael 2000) Auditorls So v b . ,,q 8, 8, 9a8 7863532 4 -I'Luditor ti s Sub, C88 ell 50 19221.00 Outlot I Don0a Addition Q-1-i n 508 4135.12 2 1 Blackmar Addition SI 122.80 17 1 Spring Valley 1 113 19042.62 18 1 Spring Valley 1 125 1914000 19 1 Spring Valley 1 125 1040.30 16 2 (Parcel U+10) Spring Valley i I, m9.60 TOTAIS: 10 2895 249793.30 Cost: Sewer Service - $1,9222.30 &.10 Services =4122.80 per service Sewer lateral: Total Cost — $23)575863 Cost of Crossing at Rice Greek Road (Outlot 19 Don's Add,)-Coubinad with lateral Charge Cost of Crossing - 6,600 3, of Rice Greek Road (Lot 178 Aud, Sub, #88) - Combined with lateral Charge Sewer Lateral Lift . $238575045 40 M5 $8,14 per foot Plus Share of Hain Lim