The URL can be used to link to this page

11/08/1965 - 59410 00 .0 SPECIAL COUNCIL M$$TING AGENDA - N0VEM1ER 8, 1965 ROLL CALL: MD=S'- Regular Meeting, November 1, 1965 O1.D BUBO 1. Proposed Amendment to Chapter 56 - Signs (Tabled 8/16/65, 9/20/65, 10/4/65, 10/18/65) 24 Sign Permit - Barger King (Tabled 10/18/65) 3. Supplemental Maintenance Agreement - Fridley • Columbia Heights - SS#12 (Tabled 10/4/65 and 10/18/65) 4, Supplemental Escrow Agreement - Fridley - Columbia Heights - SS#12 (Tabled 1014/65 and 10/18/65) 5. Resolution Authorising Agreement with Columbia Heights 33#12 (Tabled 10/4/65 and 10/18/65) 6. Resolution Authorising Agreement #54797 with Minnesota Highway Department 7. Second Reading of Ordinance Resoning C -23 and M-1 to R -3A - Portion Sylvan Hills Plat 8 8. Second Reading of Ordinsnce Reaonie8 A -1 to CR -1 Portion of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition MW lRil : 9. Safety Committee Hosting Minutes, October 20, 1965 10. Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes, October 27, 1965 It. Building Board Meeting Minutes, October 270 1965 12. Planning Commission. Meeting Minutes, October 24, 1965 13, Recreation Commission Meeting Minutes, September 30, 1965 144 Fridley Housing and Rodevelopmrent, Authority Meeting Minutes, October 131, 1965 15. Fridley Horsing and RedeveloPment•Authority Meeting Minutes, October 200-1965 Pages 1 - 11 PaSes,12 - 21 Page 22 Pages 23 b 24 Page 25 Page 26 Papa 27 G 28 Page 29 P*gs 30 Pages 31 6 32 Page 33 Pages 34 - 37 Pages 38 & 39 L� SPECIAL COUNCIL MffiTING AGENDA - NOVF.MB$R 8, 1965 (CONTiNM) 16. Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes, October 27, 1965 Pages 40 - 43 17. Communications, Pages 44 - 54 (a) N.S.S.S.Ds Appointment of Representative (b) City Engineers Acceptance of Streets (Pearson °s Craigway tad) (c) Kings Assessment* (d) Memo: Refund of Cash Bound (e) Jayceess Locke Park Cleanup (f) Circle Piness Resolution (g) PTA: 4 -rovay atop (h) City Attorney: Sewer Lateral Assessment VISU : 18. Claims Page 55 19. Estimates Pages 56 - 61 20. Licenses Pages 62 - 67 21. Petitions, 30 & 31 -1965 Pagss 68 & 69 22. Building Permdt - 339 -57th Place Northeast - Richard Miller Page TO 23. Consideration of Purchase of Tots for Tot Lot Pages 71 - 73A 24. Street Lights not on 1965 program Pages 74 & 75 25. Sign Permit - 7325 Central Avenue Northeast - Legdo4n Page 76 26. Sign Permit - Shorewood Center - Country Club Harket Page 77 27. Resolution Certifying Charges to County Auditor Pages 78 & 79 28. Un Resolutions Authorising and Directing the Splitting of Assessments Para 80 & 81 29. Consideration of Susing Code ADMs r SPECIAL COUNCIL MWING AGENpA Ct 1TS - NOVEMER 8, 1965 • ■ r■ r. rwrr. ra■ r■■ �rnr. rr■+.+. �rnr.. �a. rn. r.. .�w.■■rs.'r.r.er.r■�w�...w.r.ru 1. PROPOSED AWDT TO CHAPTER 56 - SIGNS (TABLED 8/16,/65. 9/20/65, 10/4/65, 10/18/65)s This proposed ordinance is on Pages 12 throu* 21. I have reveived no cousnunications from the Chamber of Connercoo 2. SIM PRRWT - BtNtGER KING (TABLED 10/18/65)2 The applieatioo for a permit is on page 220 3 • , 4,v & S. SUPPUDW TAL 88TWEEN FRINLiY MW COLLMIA HBIons - 8s #12 AND RESOLUTION AMORIZIliG , 410 11101NTSt I have no copies of these agrem ants or this resolution avai,labls to place in the agenda. I assume that there will be nothing forthcoming from Columbia Heights until after their public hearing an Noved et 90 1965. This may require a special cobneil meeting on the 10th os litho 6. RBSOLUTZON A#Tl' MIZING A 'I IaT #54797 WI79 MMMSOTA SIG MAY MPARTJONT= The letter is on Page 23, and t1w -resolution is an Page 24o I Will have a copy of the agraeeant available for your • inspection. Very probably the City Attornoy will advise that this resolution not be passed until the matter with Coluivibia Heights is catopletfecl. 7. SSCObiD R coma OF oRDINw= RumnG C -2S AND *-I TO R --3A - POWI eI SYLVAN HILLS PLAT as The ordinance is on Page 25 and is self - explanstory0 S. SECOND READING OF 2 G R -1 TO CRwl - PORTION OF OOTLOT 1, MLOOY WWOR 4TH ADDITION: The ordinance on Pago 26 is self• sa planstory. 9. SAFETY C0 METING XZW=S, OC'i'OM 20, 1%51 M* Co11m1tteri took no action, Page 27, oat the four -gray stop sign trquest by the principal of Parkview School, tabling action until NOVUd ae -17. There Lao however, a letter Caron+ the Patkview PTA on Pages 50 and 51 (under Item #17 (g) of this agenda) which relates to this iten' la the safety Camm ttee minutes I an foswarding a copy of this letter, and a traffic cent, to the Safety for their meeting of Novendmv 17th. I will have the Superior oil Oospany plans available . for yaw inspection, althov*h I believe this decision was left up to the safety Cc=ittee after you approved the building pera1t0 No action required on balance of minutes on Page 280 SPRCIAL COTMCIL NOMIG AGSM A CO UTS - NOMMIN8R Be 1965 (Continued) 10. BQM OF APMAW MUTIRG iUMS# OCTOBER 27e 1965: The SoWd t�roaemsnded in the second item on Page 29 that the Speaial Use Permlt be granted • The Planning Comission in Item 03 on Page 32 contisosd consideration of this matter to the Nowaaw lath► meeti ng o Tine Camcil a however a could if you wialn e . aft a pdblic hearing for.; this at the ear21ee0t ties that legal pvb2ieratiemn can be erode . Ile BUILDING BOARD FETING SCGTSS - OCTOBER 27# 1965: ZA the ite n on Page 30, the Board r 0 !M M K Ond8 ,permitting the movieng Permit and I believe, three of the Council were contacted by the 4yows cad Informally approved this. It would require, formal action haw►. 12* PLA18 =G =NUSSION IUBT=Q S . OCT()BER 28. .1965s These minutes area an Pages 31 and 32* Action ta%m by the Plniv� Coaemi,ssion Zw your esnnsideration Is in Item #1 on Page 310 The reason that the Planning CamUsslan consideved the site relative to P tck M 4r6&, and setbacks, and made a is that In the n4W CR -1 addition to the City Cede, theve was no pWavisioa NWW far se!Awkse Parking area requiremwts, ate. In the now fi;tnre, the Plarming Cimmiseion will submit far tine Council ° s approval, area oodiaaMAM to pV0vJ40 this UndW the CR sowing' 13, RNMATZON COMMSSION MZT=G MMWTRS - $SP'1'SINU 30, 1965s These .hates are on Page 33, If thane is any item that yeim w"& to discuss. it can be discussed at this timso 24.j 15,v 6 16, FMLSY 80US =o AW RSEWSLOPIUt+ T AU'1'SORM MRBTXNG MISt?i'RS, OCTOBER 13e 1965, OCTOBER 20e 1965. AM OCTOBER 27, 1965: These minutes are an Pages 34 through 43. =f there aro a W stow that you wish to dismuse they am be discussed at this tier. 170 iICATXONS s ta) N.S.S.S,D.: AppoiRtent of Represeatatiy .8 2b* lett M on page " is self-e 1planatc oey. jW LOU* is that SUPerinatesnd"t of Utilities ChSSMW and PluMbing ZASpsotoar Sandia be certified to the &OW40 (b) City SngineetI Acxagptance of .Streets (Peaersem•s Csarigway 2nd) s The mean. on Page 45 is cal f- emplanataxy, (a) Kisngs Assesemaesntss This letter is an Page 46. The • FFianatnae Directors ° s mom MWIAiaiAg this n�sttear is an Page (4) Mans Refund of Cash Bananas The anraru ca Page 47 is self - saq�lauatoary • Pexhsps see of yo4 would wiab to confirm this !I= by locking at the stsnatue+e. SPECIAL COIL l8$TIW AM MA CAS - NUVZMBR 8, 1965 (Continued) (e) Jaycees: Locke Park Cleanup: The $843.00 invoice on Page 48 is apparently trucking that the Jaycees would like to have the City pay from its Federal tornado funds in addition to the $5,800.00 paid the Jaycees for cleaning up a pa ction of Locke Park. M Circh.e Pines: Resolution: The resolution IN an Page 49. (g) P*T.Ae: Four -Way Step: This letter an Pages 50 and 51 was miis-tioaed previously in these comMsts e Item #90 (h) Cityy` Attorney: SlW*r Lettlm'al Asses I - ilita ft* City Att- oCn*Y ° S lettec ' is on Pages 52 and 53 and tht mWO from tha Finance Direct 'C r is an Page 54. This is the mattes beought up by Mr, scbmadeke at the last owt3adg. 1S. CI AZW s Ths claim news are an Page 55. Detail of the Claims is iaaclttided its the envelops with the sugenda. • 19a SSTIMATESs A list of the est_tes is on Pages 56 and 570 The detail Of the final estimate is on Pages 58 through 60 There is i an additional debris cleanup estimate on Page 61 that s not listed on Pages .56 and. 57. Tornado damage detail to City -owned facilities listed on Page 57 is in the envelope with the agetafte 20. LICEMSt "The list.. of ; the -Atones for Council approval is found an Pages 63 and 63. naltiple dwelling licames under the regiatza- tion ordinance are found on Pages 64 through 67. 21. PRTITION.S 030 -1965 AM #31.1965: These petitions are on Pages 68 23. BULL XM PRMW - 339 -57TH PLAN THBAST - RED M MR: Thais building permit, Page 70, was in the proposed vki)an raw wal sates and Js;. Miller: delayed the request until after the election on Noveefter 2nd. At this writing, I do not know exactly what he wants to build, but I understand he will be at time meetitg with =once specific plans o i'k . 23. COIfi3IMRATIC6 OF PIAtCMW OF LOTS PM TOT L' OT: The memos on Pages . 71 and 72 help to eiplain the letter an Page 73Ae T'he drawing an Page 73 shows the lots and the problem in question. • SPMCIAL COLIC= MRTING AGCNM CONMWS - SOVENBRR S® 1965 (Continued) 24. STRSST LIGHTS NOT on 1965 PROM Ma on Page 74 is a City amp showing the six requests for street lights that have Cone in recently, acne of which were provided for in the 1965 progrMA. Saw of these I have slamitted to Councilmen Kirkham "d shecidan, and they approved the installation, but I put all six on the naPo since *me of them I have not had time to refer to the Councilmen of the Ward in Which the request is madeo The two at each and Of the Min Street bridge probably would be 100000 lumen lights at $50.00 par year@ and the other four would be 6,000 juism lights at W -00 POW year. The letter an Page 75 is self - Wiamtocy. 25. SIGN PSRNZT - 7325 CENTRAL AvB== Lamont The sign permit application is an Page 76. 26. SIGN PIMM - SFIORSWOOD CSJMM COMM CLUB MARXRT: The sign peacmit application is an Page 77. 27. RRSOLVnon CWMS TO C90tAM ALDIMs The resolution is an Page 780 and the work that was done is described in the letter On Page 79. 28c M RSSOILUI'IONS AUTAORTLM AM Mann u TAB SPLIT =e or SpiCIAL ASSSSSNMTS t -- These resolutions an Pages 80 and 81 are. the routins type of resolutions that you haw passed in great quantity in the last DOVWal years., One motion can pass these and the secretary will split them into two separate resolution motions. 290 CONSIMMMICK OF 80USIM COER t Mayor idea asked that this be placecd an the ageaWa. The City Attorney advises that he will have Material Boar you at the meeting. ...,-..,.–.:....>- �m,...-.–.._. �: �« r— a�.++ �.=<.,. rm�.,--, �« ru... n., mw�er- sas'+ aa�r* wos. �:,,: t+ x..: r<„--:.++ T�CY. s7°- � .s•�al<wana+e�sa,��#au:S:�rl:�a .+.rc+...�R.•�•.`�°"e • TTM MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL METING OF NOVEMiy:,R 1., 1.965 The regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fridley was called to order by Mayor Nee at 8 :01 F.M. Members Present: Nee, Kirkham, Wright, Thompson, Sheridan Members Absent: None APPROVAL. OF MINUTES..RECULAR COUNCIL MEETING - OCTOBER 118, 196.: Motion by Kirkham to adopt the minutes of the Regular Council Iteeting of October 18, 1965 as submitted. Seconded by Wright. Upon c voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARING REZONING R -1 TO CR -1 PORTION OUTIOT 1, MELODY MANOR 4TH ADDY.M N: The City Manager read the Notice of Hearing. The Mayor explained the purpose of the rezoning for the benefit of the • visitors to the Council Meeting. Councilman Wright asked vr.ethtr Mr. Hafner presented plans for the land use of the remainde;i of Outlot 1. The City Manager stated that Mr. Hafner has done so, and hiiipl&ns are presently being considered by the Planning Commission. Mayor Nee declared the Hearing closed. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE REZONING R -1 TO CR -1 PORTION OUTLIYT 1. HEIM MANOR 4TH ADDITION: Motion by Sheridan to adopt, upon first reading, the Ordinan;s rezoning R -1 to CR -1 portion of Outlot 1 In Melody Manor 4th Addition Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a roll call vote, all voting aye, the moticu carried. LOT SPLIT - L.S. #65 -13 OUTLOT 1. MELODY MANOR 4TH ADDITION: Councilman Sheridan asked whether the North Suburban Hospital District has given a 30 foot easement to the City for construction of the west side of the street between Outlot 1 and the Unity Hospital property. The City Engineer answered that the N.S.H.D. has not done so, but :hat Mr. Johanson, a board member of the N.S.H.D., has stated that the Hos- pital District will do so. Councilman Wright inquired whether any land use in the CR -1 zone does not require Building Board approval. The City Manager answered, "No" and stated that all land use in the CR -1 zone • will be commercial use in conjunction with medical facilities ant, as such, will require approval of plans by the Building Board. Motion by Sheridan to grant.Lot Split #65 -13. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the wtion carried unanimously. 0 COUNCIL MINUTES OF NOVEM ER 1, 1965 PUBLIC HEARING FRANCHISE ORDINANCE - AMERICAN OIL COM!PANY: PAGE 2 The City Manager read the Notice of Hearing.and explained that it is the purpose of this ordinance to permit the American Oil Company to relocate the pipeline from the T.H. +#47 right -of -way. He stated that this is an urgent matter in order that construction of the storm sewer and highway can proceed. Mayor Nee asked whether it is correct that there will be no benefit to the City of Fridley directly from the construction of this pipeline. The City Manager answered that this is correct, and it is the purpose of the pipeline merely to transport fuel through the City of Fridley. Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney whether it is his opinion that it is appropriate to grant a franchise for this purpose. The City Attorney answered, "Yes ". Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney whether it is re- quired to grant a franchise in order to accomplish the change in pipeline location. The City Attorney stated that in his opinion the charter allows the City to grant a franchise for this purpose. The City Attorney stated that the charter is rather broad on this question, and actually the charter provides the City the right to grant franchises for utilities consumed in the City rather than to transport fuel through the City. Mr. Peter Coggeshall, representative of American Oil Company, was present' at the Council Meeting. The Mayor asked Mr. Coggeshall whether the American Oil Company has a vested interest in the land at the present location of the pipeline such that the Minnesota Highway Department cannot take the land. Mr. Coggeshall answered that the Minnesota Highway Department can condemn the land in which the pipeline lies even though the American Oil Company has made prier used of the land. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Coggeshall from whom the American Oil Company obtained the easement. Mr. Coggeshall answered that standard Oil Company, prede- cessors of American Oil Company, obtained the easement from the Nelson farm owners of the property in earlier years. Charles Root, representative of Arvid Carlson and Sons, was present at the Council Meeting, and stated that Carlson and Sons owns property along T.H. #47 where it is proposed to relocate the American Oil Company pipeline. Mx. Root stated that Arvid Carlson purchased this land subject to the easement of the Standard Oil. Company, the predecessor of the American Oil Company. He stated that it is the position of Arvid Carlson that the City does not have the right to grant a franchise to the American Oil Company to locate the pipeline on the public easement. Mfr. Root stated that Arvid Carlson and Sons dedicated the easement to the City for public use, sand, he stated, he dues not believe either the City Charter or State Statutes give the City the right to grant a franchise for the purpose of laying a private pipeline upon the easement. Mr. Root stated • that Arvid Carlson and Sons object to the location of the pipeline upon the public easement which they dedicated to tha City, and stated that he relieves Mr. Carlson can stop the City from doing so. He'stated that the _-,.. x :_�,r ,. ,,._,.......>.. .._ ... ......... ...... .. . .�:;�._ ..�.,:::.,;., .. .,.:: �..•.. ,:.> ..., ... -� .. �: �:;� . °.��v _ .., ..,.... ,1.�.K ,�. . v.`' n�'".: �: �" y€ s�". d9. i., L' ��saz 'sa�za°rE:a�icti��sm^%s«raxrc COUNCIL M?.;Ir'YSUS OF NOVEMR 1, 1965 • PACE 3 American Oil Company pipeline is a private transmission line not a public utility and there is no public use involved in the use of the pipeline.. Mr. Root stated that he does not believe that the City can provide a private party the use of a public easement. Mr. Root stated that he believes it is dangerous to have an 8" gasoline line near a gas main in the public street. He stated that he believes it would be better if this gasoline line is relocated on the rear of his property away from the utility services in the public street. He stated that if sever or water utilities need repairs, the plumber might inad- vertently break the gasoline line and the resulting release of fuel would' cause a hazardous condition which might result in fire or explosion, dangerous to that part of the City. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Root whether he is contending that the State already paid American Oil Company to remove from their easement. Mr. Root stated that part of the land of Carlson and Sons was condemned, that they received payment for that land included in the highway right -of -way, and that now the State of Minnesota is in the process of negotiation with the American Oil Company for the relocation of the pipeline. Mayor Nee stated that he believes the point of contention is that the pipeline does not provide a service directly to the people of the City of Fridley, and •- since it does not do so, the City does not have the right to grant a franchise to the , ricaln Oil Compaaiy\ for construction of the pipeline. Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney ghat information he has concerning the contention of Mr. hoot. The City Attorney stated that he is not prepared to enter into an argument with Mr. Root or his attorney on this question. He stated that he didn't know this problem existed or that there would be opposition to granting a franchise to the American Oil Company. He stated that it is the purpose of this hearing to obtain knowledge of these objections. The City Attorney stated that he believes the location of the pipeline would be an incidental use of the public easement. The City Attorney suggested that the attorneys of the American Oil Company be given time to find if they can support the contention that they are entitled to, or can be allowed, the use of the public easement without the property owners consent. > Mr. Sorenson, attorney for Arvid Carlson and Sons, was present at the Council Meeting and stated that case Iwo in recent years demonstrates that the City cannot use public: property for private purposes. He stated that two of these cases involved the City of Northfield in 1958 and the Village of Savage in 1960. Mr. Sorenson stated that the American Oil Company is not a public utility and would not admit to being a public utility. He stated that the American Oil Company does not have the right of eminent domain and cannot condena utility easements as public utilities may do with the right of eminent domain, Mr. Sorenson stated that he believes where . a private owner objects to the use of tine public easemnt for private purposes that the private property owner's rights will prevail. Mr. gorenson stated that he believes a private owner can make some arrangement with the American Oil Company to allow for the location of the pipeline upon the property of the private comer. Mr. Sorenson stated that he believes the City should not grant an franchise to the American Oil Company. 0 COUNCIL MXNUMS C' NOVEMER z", 1965 PAGE 4 Councilman Alright asked Mr. Coggeshall vhather it is his belief that the Minnesota Highway Department would pay, for the easement of the American Oil Company, only the amount of the cost to relocate the pipeline and not the damages incurred by such relocation. Mr. Coggeshall answered that he believes that is correct. Mr. Coggeshall stated that the utilities section of the Minnesota Highway Department is negotiating with the American Oil Company for the relocation of the pipeline. Mr. Sorenson stated that he does not believe that the fact that the Minnesota Highway Department Utilities Suction is negotiating with the Amrican Oil Company makes the American Oil Company m utility. He stated that he believes the American Oil Company would declare that it is not a public utility. Councilman Wright asked whether they American Oil Company is governed by the Railroad and Warehouse Commission or by any of the other public utility commissions. PCr. ` Sorenson stated that this is not correct. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Coggeshall whether he would care to cement on the statements made by Mr. Sorenson. Mr. Coggeshall answered that he is not an attorney and has been directed by the American. Oil Company not to fight for the location of the pipeline upon the public easement, but his purpose in coming to the Councl.l Meeting was merely to answer any questions involving engineering problems which maight arise due to relocation of the pipeline. Mr. Root asked the City Engineer whether he discussed the location of the American Oil Company pipeline with the Minneapolis Gas Company. The City • Engineer answered, "Too ", and stated%that when he talked to the representative of the Minneapolis Gas Company he was informed that they have no objection to the relocation of the American Oil Company pipeline in the same street as a gas main. Par. Root stated that he also talked to the Minneapolis Gas Company, and that they are opposed to the relocation of the American Oil Company pipeline in-the public easement. He stated that the Minneapolis Gas Company believes there is a daziger of m♦x ng gas and gasoline, and that repairs to plumbing in the street might result in a break of the gasoline line and the gas main which would create a dangerous condition. Mr. Root stated that he believes the location of the pipeline in the City street will decrease the value of the property because of the dangerous condition thereby created. Mr. Root statad that he believes it would be.better if the American Oil Company pipeline were located on the back of the property of Arvid Carlson and Sons. Mayor Nee stated that he agreed that a property owner was entitled to compensation for a private pipeline cussing property in which he has an interest. Councilman Wright stated that the City will do what is appro- priate and require this American Oil Company to work out a procedure with the fee owner before locating the pipeline in the street. Councilman Sheridan stated that he believes it is evident that the City does not have the right to grant a franchise to a private firm not a public utility, and, therefore, the American Oil Company must cross private easements. Mayor Nee stated that the City has already given the American Oil Company permission to proceed with the relocation of the pipeline. Mr. Coggeshall stated that" the American Oil Company stopped proceedings to relocate the pipeline when they were informed by Mr. Root of the objection of Arvid Carlson and Sons to the relocation. Mr. Coggeshall stated that if the City of Fridley would grant a franchise to the American Oil Company, the American Oil Company would not hold up the construction of the highway and storm sewer. Mayor Nee stated that the objection raised by Arvid Carlson and Sons may require COUNCIL MItVMMES OF A.`'OVEMBER 1, 1955 PAGE 5 the State to condemn the land of the American Oil Company and would hold up construction of the highway. Mr. Sorenson stated that he believes the legal question should be settled before the pipeline is relocated or before construction of the highway is begun. Mr. Coggeshall asked the Council to give American Oil Company time.to research the legal question and provide the City with an answer to the same. He stated that he believes the American Oil Company would need at least to the end of the month of November to research the question and find a possible solution. Mr. Coggeshall stated that as far as the safety argument is concerned, the pipeline is designed to the standards of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and he stated that the damage to the pipeline by possible plumbing construction would be the same whether the pipeline were located in the back of Mr. Carlson's property or in the City street. qtr. Coggeshall stated, further, that the danger is no greater because of the fuel in the American oil pipeline than it is for natural gas. Motion by Kirkham to continue the hearing on the question of granting a franchise to the American Oil Company to the regular Council Meeting of December 6, 1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. CHANGE ORDER #1 - SW&SS #73A AND SS#73: ` Notion by Sheridan to approve Change rder #1 for Project SW&SS#73A and SS#73. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. CHANGE ORDER #1 - SW #70: Councilman Wright stated that he believes there is every reason to move with haste to effect this construction. Motion by Wright to approve Change Order #1 for Sewer and Water Project #70. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. SIGN PERMIT - HOWARD JOHNSON RESTAURANT: Sheldon Mortenson was present at the Council Meeting and showed a picture of the proposed sign to the Council. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Mortenson whether the sign will be illuminated. Mr. Mortenson answered, "Yes." Councilman Wright asked whether the sign will have a flashing illumination. Mr. Mortenson answered, W'i'no." Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Mortenson whether Howard Johnson's own this property at the present time. Mr. Mortenson stated that he is required by Howard Johnson Restaurants to obtain a sign permit and present them with a copy in order to fulfill part of the contract. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Mortenson what the set- back of the restaurant will be from the road. Mr. Mortenson answered that the sign will be oat back 180 feet south of 53rd Avenue close to T.H. #65 but the sign will not hang over the right -of -way of T.H. #65. He stated that the sign will definitely be located in the parking lot of the restaurant. 0 COUNCIL MINUTE OF NOVEt3EER 1, 1965 PAGE 6 Motion by Aright to grant the request of Gil -tor Incorporated for a sign permit to build a ward Johnson sign upon the property at 5275 Central Avenue Northeast. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Coun,:ilmsn Sheridan asked whether there eras any urgency for the passage of tLis Resolution. The City Engineer stated that he needs time to survey property before making the final design of the Street Improvement Project. He stated that it will be necessary to begin the surveys before winter weather closes in. Councilman Sheridan asked the Finance Director whathgr it mould be possible to complete the preliminary assessment roll by November 15th. The Finance Director answered that notices to the property owners have already bean addressed and are ready for mailing, and t1tat he believes it would be possible to complete the preliminary assessment roll by November 15th. Motion. by Sheridan to adopt Resolution 192 -1965 and set the date of November 15, 1965 for the Public hearing on Street Project St. 1966 -1. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. HEARING ON THE ST. 1966- Motion by Aright to adopt Resolution #193 -1965 and set the date of November 15, 1965 for the hearing. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, the•,e being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. T.H. #65 CROSSOVER AT 63RD AVENUE NORTHEAST- Councilmen Sheridan stated that in regard to the hearing to be held for Street Improvement Project St. 1966 -2. he wished to determine that the Minnesota Highway Department will provide a crossover of T.H. #65 at 61st /venue Northeast or West Moore Lake Drive. He stated that he did not wish to see the crossover at 63rd Avenue Northeast removed. He stated that the businessmen on T.H. #65 Service Road need to have access to'T.H. #65 at 63rd Avenue Northeast. He stated that he believes the bunriness owners have a vested interest in this crossover, since it has bean in use for many years. The City Manager stated that he believes it would be possible to use the highway Department's argument against a crossover at 63rd as the City's xgument for retaining the crossover, that the streets on either side i ;f the crossover are not connected to any major through streets, that the street on the wrest side of the crossover is connected only to the service road at T.H. #65, and, therefore, the traffic load at this crossover would not be sufficient to make it necessary to-install signals nor Mould the traffic load be heavy at this.intersection. COUNCIL MnIUTES OF Noonan it 1965 PAGE 7 Councilman Wright stated that he believes the businesses along this portion of T.H. 465 have a legitimate argusssnt and a right to this cross- over. He stated that he agrees that the City of Fridley should have a crossover of T.H. #65 both at 63rd Avenue Northeast and at 61st Avenue Northeast. Motion by Sheridan to adopt Resolution #194 -1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nags, the =Dtion carried unanimously. INVESTIGATION OF H%aCIDE AT RED'S CLUB! Councilman. Wright stated that the discovery of a homicide in the parking lot of Red's Club raiaes a question, because of its use as a tavern. He. stated that he does not believe the discovery of the homicide in the parking lot of the tavern necessarily raises any questions concerning the ownership and operation of the tavern or that the tavern played any particular roll in this incident. He stated that he does believe the operation of a tavern is by nature conducive to altercations, encounters, disputes and violence. H& stated that, for this reason, the tavern was • included in the University Avenue Urban Renewal Project. Councilman Thompson stated that he believes this is a proper concern, and that it would be visa to investigate the operation of the tavern. Council- man Wright stated that he did not wish to imply that the tavern was necessarily poorly =operated, or that the owner is in any vay involved in this homicide, nor that the tavern contribut_ad to the homicide, however, he stated that he wished to have a thorough investigation of the tavern to ascertain whether the operation has been good. Motion by Wright to request the Administration to present to the Council the record of the police calls, the complaints received concerning the tavern, the reports concerned with the investigations of parties involved in any of these co plaints, and a report of the operation of Red's Club on this accauLon with the viva to posaalble Council action on the license of Red's Club. :seconded by ^hhompson. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. LOOPING UTILITY SERVICES ON CH L B.OM! The City Engineer stated that it Aould be advisable to make a connection between two dead -end mains on Chanml Road and the service road of T.H. #65 in order to provide a loop for the water service lines to this area. He started that thin is necessary for good fire protection and to maintain the quality of the water in this part of the main. The City Engineer • shoved a map of the utility services to the Council and explained what construction would be necessary to complete the loop. The City Engineer stated that one difficulty with the construction of the loop is that the Knights of Columbus wish to make ak connection to City water services immediately, and if their connection is made, there is a question whether they could be assessed for construction of the loop. The City Engineer also stated that it would, be necessary to complete construction of the �J COUNCIL KIMMS OF ta0VF_I,=F. 1, 1965 PAGE 8 utilities before the streets are improved and it has been proposed to construct this street the following year. Mr. Steve Gorecky was present at the Council Meeting representing the Knights of Columbus and he stated that the Knights of Columbus wish to open their building by January 1, 1966 for a Now Years Eve party, had printed tickats for the party and engaged a band for playing at that time. He stated that at the time that the Knights of Columbus building is opened, it will be necessary for them to have water and sewer facilities in they building. Mr. Don Harstad was present at the Council Meeting also representing the Knights of Columbus and stated that Eerghorst Plumbing and Beating is doing the plumbing construction for the Knights of Columbus building and had obtained a permit for con- nection to the City services. He stated that the plumber showed plans for the connection to Lester Chesney, Superintendent of the Public Works Department, and had received an okay for the connection but this day the Knights of Columbus were infor�,ned that the connectiona would not be satisfactory. The City Manager stated that Mr. Chesney had merely okayed the connection to services as being adequate to provide grater and sewer services to the building. He stated that Mr� c1heaney was not considering the construc- tion of a loop of the water services at the time he okayed the connection. The City Manager stated that if the connection is made, the Knights of Columbus building will receive less benffit from the loop, although the building would receive additional fire protection from construction of the loop. Mr. Haretud stated that the Knights of Columbus will need a water connection to ttae building at this time so the contractor can use the water to compact the soil around the building. He stated that construction should be under way nctO to avoid problems of frost at a later date. Councilman Sheridan stated that if the knights of Columbus were to connect to the City sewer and water aervicaa at this time, he saw no reason why they could not be assessed for coastructiLon of the loop at a later date.. The Finance Director atated that he beli~evea the Knights of Columbus should sign an afire nt with thu City stating that they would accept assessments for construction of the water loop at a future date. Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Goreck-f whether he understood the problem. Mr. Gorecky asked hors much the assessmnts would be for construction of the loop. Councilman Sheridan a awered that the assessments Mould be approximately $5 per front foot apread over twanty years and *ould amount to roughly $1600 or $17N. Mayer Nee stated that an additional problem to the City without conetr€sction of the loop is the low pumper capacity which the Fire Department wo ,,gild have due to a long connection from the nearest five hydrant to the building. • a Thy: City Engineer stated that he feels it io best that the water loop be constructed. He stated that he wished to bring this to the attention of the Council so that, if anything were to happen in the future if the loop should not be constructed, the Council would be aware that this was COUNCIL ?(INUT96 OF NOMZR 1, 1963 PAM 9 pointed out for the information of the Council. Mr. Harstad asked if the Knights.of Columbus were to waive their right to object to the assessment if the connection pernit could be granted. !Mayor Nee stated that the as= question arose concerning the -rater services for St. William's Church. He stated that there was a question of fire protection and St. Hilliame agreed to pay these assesaments. Mr. Gorecky stated that he does not believe the Knighto of Columbus have a choice but would have to pay assessments for construction of the water loop in order to obtain adequate fire protection. for Ate* stated that people on Channel Road would need the addi.tion&l fire ProtsctiOn as trail as the _ Knights of Columbus. He stated that the Administr*tion -could drat® an agreement which the Knights of Columbus could sign which would provide that the Knights of ColvwabuB agrcae to parry assessments for construction to loop the water main. Councilman Sheridan stated that the reason this question is raised at this time is that the City might build a service road along T. H. X465 the following year. w stated that, whereav acme of this property is not developed, it is expected that it would be developed in the near future. Councilmen Sheridan asked thee ynights of Columbus whether they wished to have construction of the road tha following year. Mr. Harstad answered that he hopes the City will rough grade the road past the Knights of Columbus building this year, and- build than road the following year. Councilmen Sheridan asked Vc. Harst'adtwhether`he understood that construc- tion would necessarily provide Mwl inconvenience to the Knights of Columbus during the geraod of consti:uation. Hr. Harstad answered that he under - stood that thins _qav F be tree caste • m_,. Gid-rauky stated that representatives of the yxaighta of coi =bua would be willing to sign aut agreement with the City to accept aseessmants for construction of the -rater loop. FOR A VARL 4CE Vv. Sa'E' IVTR_ OF THE FEET TO 30 FEET BY . Saxton was present at the Cocci: yloeting and explained his reason for wishing to eblclose a foyer on the front of his howl. He presented, with his application, a latter fr*m the adjoin-fug property a smer, one John F. Christie, whereii-a 'Mr, Chri.ati* ffitatad that he has no objection to granting the variance. Notion by Kirkham to approve the request of williasm Saxton for a waiver of the front yard requirement from 3V to 34' -7" to permit construction of a foyer upon his property at 6501 - 7th Street Northeast. Seconded by Wright. Upon � voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BLECTION %AW - POSSISTE VIOLATION: Councilman Wright stated that he vyishad to call the attention of the Council to the election law that campaign aLgas are not permitted within 100 feet o`f a polling place during the 24 houses of the day of the election. He stated that such a sign was presently in existences, that election day would begin within 2� hours and he hoped to see the sign removed-before such a violation would occur. • COUNCIL MINUTES OF Nf W.MR -4, 1.46- PACE 10 Motion by Wright that the City Clerk notify the owners of the election sign within 100 feet of the polling place to remove emw before the sign is a violation of the lase on election day. Seconded by Thompson. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. OVERTIM PAY FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES DOING DISASTER CIZANUP WORK: Councilman Sheridan stated that the building inspector wished to obtain payment for overtime work done during the disasters in the City of Fridley. He stated that such payment probably could not be made unless the City could be reimbursed for the sauce from Federal Funds. He asked whether the City Manager could final out whether it would be possible to obtain Federal Disaster Funds to make such payment. The City Manager stated that he would have to investigate this question. Mayor Mee asked the City Manager whether he had kept a record of overtime hours spent by salaried employees. The City Manager stated that he had some of the records, but was not sure that all the recorde were maintained. Motion by Wright to' direct the City Manager to apply for additional Federal reimbursement for overtime work done by City salaried employees during the disaster. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • WATER CONNECTION CHARGE - DAVID SCIMEXE: The City imager stated that he had received a letter from the City Attorney concerning the question of the connection charge for water services to the property of David Schmedeks and &.,request to add' -it to the Council Meeting agenda of November 8th. He stated that he planned to put this item on the agenda at that time and that at the present time he and the City Finance Director have not had adequate time to study the question. Councilman Wright asked whether time would shortly run beyond the statute of limitations for collection of this debt. The City Attorney answered that the statute of limitations was not involved in the collection of the connection charge but would be involved in the collection of sever and water use charges. lie stated that under the law connection charges constitute liens against the land. The City Attorney atated that in researching the law, he sought to find a manner whereby the City Council could compromise this matter for the benefit of the property owner. iz atated that one assumption that could be made is tiie assessment was levied against the property, but that the property owner did not receive notice of the assessment and, therefore, the assessment would not actually have been made. Ha stated that the property owner had obtained an aseessment search of the property when he purchased the saw and was not notified that this connection charge was outstanding against the property. He stated that when the property owner sold the property another assessment search was made:, and the City Clerk noticed the mistake, namely, • that the connection charge against the property was not recorded. The City Attorney stated that there is a queation whether, under the law, the City can collect a connection charge when the lot was split and the charge is not fully assessed at that time. The City Attorney stated that he reviewed this F v • COUNCIL M NUTgs oF Non-Mm 1 1965 PACE 11 question wits Charles Howard, and Charles Howard confiTued that there is a doubt whether the statuto applied, The City Attorney stated than he did not believe that there was any reason to make a quick decision concerning this connection charge, since the new buyer put this amount in escrow in order to complete the deal for purchase of the property. The City Attorney stated that if the Council did make a cowromise settlement with the owner for the connection charge, he did not believe the Council would be setting a precedent for the same., since there would be few similar cases in the City of Fridley. He stated that, whereas, someone might contend that a similar case existed in the event that unoccupied Land is improved and the property owner does not receive a proper notice of the connection charge, he does not believe that the cases would be sufficiently similar that the City need be concern& Tho City meager stated that he discussed the question briefly with the finance DiTector and ' " felt that the Council would need more ixxformafi*n on tl«a sate. The Mayor stated that he would like to read the letter of the City Attorney before deciding what action the Council should take. The Council tools no action upon this mattere ADJO RNMENT • There being no further business, Mayor wee declared the regular Council Mgeeting of Movember 1, 1965, adjourned�at 9 :40 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Raymond Z. Bade Secretary to the Council ORDINANCE -0 AN ORDINANCE REGULAU NG THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, ALTERATION, LOCATION OR MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, PROVIDING FOR THE POSTING OF BONDS: THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND FEES THEREFOR, THE REVOCATION OF PERMITS: INSPECTION AND FEES THEREFOR: PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF: AND FOR REPEALING CITY CODE SECTION 45.06 SUBD. 8 AND ENACTING CHAPTER 56. The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: 1. There is hereby enacted a new Chapter of the City Code of.Fridley as follows: 56. SIGN REGULATIONS 56.01 This ordinance shall hereafter be known and cited as the "Sign Regulations ". 56.02 DEFINITIONS. As used in this ordinance unless the context otherwise indicates: (1)- SIGN. The Term "Sign" shall mean a name, identification, des- cription, display, illustration, structure or device which is affixed to, or painted, or represented directly or indirectly upon a building or other outdoor surface or piece of land, and which directs attention to an object, product, place, activity, person, institution, organization or business. (2) SIGN, AUTOMOBILE SERVICE. The Term "Automobile Service Sign" means any 'sign that does not exceed 32 square feet directing the motorist travelling along the highway to a place or places catering to motoring needs. These include: Auto laundry, eating establishment, motels, motor hotels, refreshment drive -ins, public garages, parking areas, repair garages, service stations, drive -in theatres, and amusements parks. (3) SIGN, BILLBOARD. The term "Billboard" means any sign erected, constructed, or maintained for the purpose of outdoor advertising, whether such sign is independently supported or placed upon the ground, roof or wall of any building, and the advertisement thereon does not relate to commodities Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 2 • being sold or the business being conducted upon the premises. (4) SIGN, BUSINESS. The term "Business Sign" shall mean any sign which directs attention to a business or profession or to the primary commodity, service'or entertainment sold or offered upon the premises where such sign is located or to which it is attached. (5) SIGN, FLASHING. The term "Flashing Sign" shall mean any illuminated sign on which the artificial light is not maintained both sta- tionary and constant in intensity and color at all times when such a sign is in use. (6) SIGN, IDENTIFICATION. The term "Identification Sign" shall mean any sign identifying a resident, school, church or other non - business use. (7) SIGN, ILLUMINATED. ,The term "Illuminated Sign" shall mean any sign which has characters, letters, figures, design or outline illumin- ated by electric lights or luminous tubes as a part of the sign proper. (8) SIGN, TEMPORARY. The term "Temporary Sign" shall mean any sign not over 40 square feet in industrial areas or 15 square feet in all other areas which is not permanently affixed to the ground or a building. Section 56.03 FEES. Permit fees for signs shall be: (1) For signs 40 square feet or less an initial fee of $10.00 and an annual charge of $5.00 for an inspection of such sign. The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly on a building, which advertises products sold or services provided in that building. (2) For signs larger than 40 squre feet the initial fee shall be $25.00 plus 25 cents per square foot of the sign surface exceeding 100 square feet. The annual inspection fee shall be $12.50 plus 10 cents per square foot of the sign surface exceeding 100 square feet. L� n I• Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 3 The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly on a building, which advertises products sold or services provided in that building. (3) No fees are required for the non - permit signs provided for in Section 56.06 and may be waived for religious, civic, school and public interests by a majority vote of the City Council. Section 56.04 PERMIT APPLICATION. Application for permits shall be made upon blanks provided by the Building Inspector and shall state or have attached thereto, the following information: (1) Name, address and telephone number of applicant. (2) Location of building, structure, or lot to which or upon 1 which the sign is to be attached or erected. (3) Position of the sign or other advertising structures in relation to nearest buildings, structures, public streets or rights of way. The drawing showing such position shall be prepared "in scale." (4) Two blue prints or ink drawings of the plans and specifications and method of construction or attachment to the building or in the ground including all dimensions. Locating all light sources, wattage, type and color of lights, and details of any light shields or shades. (5) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the structure is designed for dead load and wind velocity in the amount required by this and all other ordinances of the City. structure. (6) Name of person, firm, corporation, or association erecting (7) Written consent of the owner of any land on which the structure is to be erected. (8) Any electrical permit required for any sign. (9) AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY: (a) Which would authorize and direct the City of 14 i • Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 4 Fridley to remove and dispose of any signs and sign structure on which a permit has been issued but which was. not renewed, if the owner does not remove the same within a 30 day period following the expiration 6f the permit. (b) Which would authorize and direct the City of Fridley to remove the sign and sign structure, at the expense of the applicant, where maintenance is required and the maintenance is not furnished, but only after a hearing and after a notice of 60 days specifying the maintenance required by the City. (10) Such other information as the Building Inspector may require. • Section 56.05 LICENSES AND BONDS. No person, firm, or corporation shall engage in the business of erecting signs, nor shall he be entitled to a permit to erect a sign under this ordinance unless licensed to do so by the City Council. Such license may be granted by the City Council after written application to the City Clerk, accompanied by an annual license fee of $25.00 and it may be terminated at any time for cause. The license shall expire on December 31st, in the year of issuance and each _ year thereafter. No license shall take effect until the licenses shall file with the City Clerk a corporate surety bond in the sum of $1,000.00 conditioned that the licenses shall make proper application for all sign work, pay necessary permit fees, conform to all the provisions of this Chapter and indemnify and hold the City, its officers and agents, harmless from any damage or claim resulting from or related to the erection or maintenance of any sign in the City by the licensee. Section 56.06 PERMITS. It shall be unlawful to keep, install, construct, erect, alter, revise, reconstruct, or move any outdoor sign 0 ti a , Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 5 or sign structure within the City of'Fridley without first obtainli4tig a permit therefor, except the following: (1) A sign not exceeding 15 square feet in area pertaining only to the sale, rental, or lease of the premises upon which displayed. (2) An identification sign, not exceeding 4 square feet in area. (3) A business sign not exceeding 10 feet in area, which sign is placed on non - public property, (4) A temporary political sign in regard to a candidate or an election. (5) A temporary sign erected by a religious, eleemosynary, charitable, benevolent, educational, public or civic interest, provided that each such sign shall bear the name and address of the responsible owner and shall be removed within 15 days after the date to which the temporary sign has relevance. All permits and the annual fees therefor shall expire April 30th of each year and must be renewed prior to that date. Section 56.07 GENERAL REGULATIONS. No sign shall be erected or painted in the City of Fridley unless it shall conform to and meet these regulations: (1) No sign shall be installed, which by reason of position, shape or color would conflict with the proper functioning or interpretation of any traffic sign or signal. (2) There shall be no flashing signs in the front setback within 150 feet of a street intersection. is IUA Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 6 Lighted revolving signs shall be permitted within this area but the bottom of the sign surface shall be a minimum of fourteen feet above the street grade at that point. (3) Except for grand openings and holidays, banners and streamers may not be used. (4) There shall be no use of revolving beacons, zip flashers or similar devices that would so distract automobile traffic as to constitute a safety hazard. (5) Except in Industrial Districts, signs shall not be painted directly to any exterior building surface but shall be on a separate frame except for temporary display windows. Sign letters, symbols may be attached directly to a wall by adhesive or mechanical means. (6) Temporary signs advertising buildings for rent and for sale may be placed in the yard of such building providing such signs are not closer than 10 feet to any property line and do not exceed 40 square feet in industrial areas and 15 square feet in other areas. (7) Signs not otherwise allowed advertising new housing developments of more 'than 30 building sites and located in Fridley may be constructed in any district, providing: Any one sign is not over 600 square feet; the signs are located at least 300 feet from any pre- existing home and 1,000' from any sign advertising the same development and the signs are removed when the particular project is 95% sold out. (8) Except for grand openings and temporary signs less than 6 square feet, there shall be no temporary signs in any required setback area. There shall be no more than three such signs on any parcel and the total sign area shall not exceed 18 square feet. Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 7 (9) All temporary signs shall comply immediately with these ` performance standards upon the date this Chapter goes into effect. (10) No signs shall overhang the public right -of -way. (11) Directional signs not located on the premises of use in question may not be located in any district except by special permit. (12) The illumination of any sign located within 500 feet of any residential district lot line shall be diffused or indirect, non - flashing, and designed so as not to reflect rays of light into adjacent residences. (13) TEMPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS. Temporary political signs shall be removed by the person or persons placing such signs within 15 days after the election for which they are applicable. Each such sign shall show the name and address, printed or indelible ink, of the person responsible for the placing of the sign, who shall be deemed prima facia the person who placed the sign and is responsible for its removal. No person shall deface or remove a temporary political sign, prior to 24 hours following the election, except with the consent and knowledge of the person responsible for the placing of the sign. (14) All signs shall be maintained in good condition and the areas around them kept free from debris, bushes, high weeds, and from anything else which would be an eyesore or nuisance. The surface of all signs must be repainted at least once every two (2) years or whenever necessary as determined by inspection to prevent the sign surface from becoming unkempt in appearance. When any sign is removed, the building inspector shall be notified and the entire surrounding area shall be cleared of all debris and unsightly projections and protrusions. • (15) In multiple unit dwellings one identification or business sign not exceeding 12 square feet shall be permitted for i Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 8 each dwelling group of 6 to 12 units. One identification or business sign not exceeding 40 square feet shall be permitted for each dwelling group of 12 or.more units. V (16) The permit owner and the licensee shall each separately and jointly be responsible for all of the requirements of this Chapter, including the liability for expense of removal and maintenance incurred - ._..._ by the City. Section 56.08 SIGN REQUIREMENT BY LAND USE. If they conform to and meet the General Regulations, the following signs may be erected or maintained as shown for each district. No other signs shall be erected; except that temporary political signs, may be erected in any • district. (1) R - 1, R - 2 and R -3 DISTRICTS. a. Type - Identification and Business Signs only. b. Number - One only on any lot. c. Size - Not more than 12 square feet, except as provided for in 56.07 (15). d. Maximun height = Not more than 4 feet above street grade. e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any sign in residential district shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from any property line. f. Illumination - Not permitted. (2) C -1 and C -IS DISTRICTS. a. Type - Identification, Business and Automobile Service Signs. b. Number - One per principal entrance or per building. r � LJ K] • Ordinance - Signs, Billboards 0 �i Page 9 c. Size - The gross surface,area of all permitted signs on a lot or parcel shall not exceed the. sum of 4 square feet per front foot of building. d. Height - No more than 4 feet above outside wall closest to the sign. e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any sign may project only two feet into setback from building. f. Illumination - Illuminated but non - flashing signs permitted. (3) C -2, C -2S and P DISTRICTS., a. Type - Identification, Business, Automobile Service and Illuminated Signs permitted. b. Number - Business Signs: One on building or one pylon or pedestal sign per each rental or separate business unit with frontage on thoroughfare. One additional permitted for open 100 feet of frontage. c. Size - No sign'shall exceed 40 square feet. d. Height - No part of a pylon or pedestal sign shall be less than 14 feet vertical distance above the street grade level or more than 25 feet vertical distance above street grade level. Roof signs may not be over 6 feet above nearest outside wall. e. Projection - No sign shall be closer than 10 feet from the property line. f. Illumination - Illuminated and flashing signs permitted except those which are hazardous to vehicular traffic or create a nuisance to occupants of residences in the area. r J .s 0 Ordinance - Signs, Billboards Page 10 (4) X -1 and M -2 DISTRICTS. a. Types - All types permitted. b. Number - One per each.500 feet of street frontage. c. Height - No ground sign over 30 feet above grade and no roof sign more than 30 feet above the nearest outside wall. Section 56.10 HARDSHIP WAIVER. The provisions of this chapter I may be waived wherer a strict application would bring undue hardship and the public interest would not be seriously jeopardized after a public hearing before the Board of Appeals and an affirmative vote of 4 members of the City Council. Section 56.11. Any violation of this ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense: Section 56.12.REPEAL. Subdivision 8 of Section 45.06 and any other portions of the Fridley City Code inconsistent with this chapter are hereby repealed. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1965. Attest: Marvin Brunsell City Clerk Hearing: • First Reading: Second Reading: Published.....: William J. Nee, Mayor APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT Permit No. Location Satellite Lane & University Ave. N. E. Fridley, Minn., Oct.. 1 196$ FRIDLEY INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Owner Burger King Restaurant • Kind of Building Used as Restaurant Work to be completed about May — Spring 1966 Estimated Cost $ DESCRIPTION How installed:_ Pylon sign 210 sq. ft. Dimensions: Length 201 , Height 2814" Thickness 18" Distance from Sidewalk Roof Constructed of: Iron, x , Wood Illuminated:_ Yes, Neon Wiring Application No. Signed By �np/ /� 9 .0 • STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT 9 1546 UNIVERSITY AVENUE ST. PAUL, MINN. 55104 October 199 1965 Mr. Earl Wagner Fridley City Manager 16431 University Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421 In reply refer to: 319. S.P. 0205 -19 (T.H. 47) Proposed Coop. Agree. No. 54797 t145th Ave. N.E. Outfall System" Dear Sir: Transmitted herewith in triplicate is a form of agreement to provide for payment by the State of part of the costs that will be incurred by the City of Fridley in connection with the construction by the City of the joint Fridley -Columbia Heights storm sewer system adjacent to Trunk Highway 47. This storm sewer system will provide an outlet for the storm sewer system to be constructed by the State on said trunk highway (S.P. 0205-18). One copy of the estimate of construction costs and division of costs is enclosed herewith. If this agreement meets with your approval, kindly present it to your City Council for their approval and execution. When the agreement is executed by the City, all copies of it are to be returned to this office along with certified copies of a new resolution passed by the City Council authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to sign it on its behalf. A suggested form of such resolution is also enclosed. A copy of the agreement will be returned to the City when the agreement is fully. executed by the State. Sincerely, D. R. McFadden Deputy District Engineer Z1 l • 0 24 Form 21232 RESOUV ION BE IT RESOLVED that the ( (City) enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Highways for the following purposes, to -wits to provide for payment by the State to the City of Fridley of part of the cost of oonstrnotion by the City of its "Storm Sewer Projeot No. 12" which will provide an outlet for Trunk Highvey No. 12 drainage '-, BE TT FMTHER RESOLVED that. the ( ) (3kyor) and Clerk be and. they hereby are authorized to eaeoute suo4 agreement. CERT IFTUT ION , State of Minnesota County of Anoka (` (City) Fridley Y hereby oertify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and oorreot oop; of resolution presented to and adopted by the Counoil of the MOM=) (City) of Fridl2Z at a, duly authorized meeting thereof held on th• y or as shown by the minutes of said meeting In my possession. 2 ORDINANCE NO. • AN ORDINANCE TO AIMM THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CH@IGE 714 ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley.and described as: That part of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 14, end that part of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 15, .Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnevota or that part of Lots 16 through 27, Block 9, Lovell Addition to Fridley Park and part of vacated alley in said Block 9, and that part of Lots 22 through 27, Block a in said Addi- tion and part of vacated Main Street, described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Sylvan dills Plat 6; thence West along the North line of Mercury Drive as platted in Sylvan Hills Play: 3, a distance of 350 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of Sylvan Dills Plat 6, a distance of 235.3 feet; thence East to its intersection with the West line of said Sylvan Hills Plat 6, said intersection being 235 feet Borth of said Southwest corner of Sylvan Dills Plat 6; thence South along said West line to the point of beginning Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known as R -3A (ssultiple family dwellings). SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area from zoned district C-28 (general shopping area) and M -1 (light industrial area) to R-3A (multiple family dwellings). PASSED BY THE CITY COXMCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIULET THIS DAY OF , 1965. MAYOR William J. roe ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell • Public Hearing: October 18, 1965 First Reading: nr„Q pr 7 a. 1 AtiS Second Reading: Publish.......: ORDINANCE NO. • AN ORDINANCE TO AMID TE8 CIn COM OF THE CITY OF FRIDM, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CROGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of this City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SEMON 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SICTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: The North 400.00 feet of the West 217.80 feet of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, subject to an easement over the West 30 feet thereof for street purposes, lying in the Northeast Quarter (NBA) of Section 11, T -30, 8 -241, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known as CR -1 (clinics and allied laboratories). SB=ON 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to • change the official zoning trap to show said tract or area from sowed district 1-1 (single family dwelling) to CA -1 (clinics and allied laboratories). PASSIM BY TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRINM THIS DAY OF , 1965. iffRE Wit J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLESB - Marvin C. Brunel Public Bearing: November 1, 1965 First Reading= N+ o- v;MR =1965 Second Beading: Publish.......: • 2� 2'7 FRIDLEY SAFETY CMHITTEE MEETING MI ims - OCTOBER 20, 1965 The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Linton at $;10 P. M. l�[an PRESENT. Linton, Bendel, Ssegda, Frits,Weiss, Oden, Christenson, Rossing OTHERS PRES=t City Manager Wagner, Lee Switzer, Principal of Parkview School, Mr. Cohen from the Minnesota Safety Council. The minutes were read by the Secretary. Motion by Fritz, seconded by Ssegda, that the minutes be approved as read. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Vice Chairman Linton declared the motion carried. FOUR -WAY STOP SIGNS AT 61ST AND 7TH STREETS NORTHEAST. Mr. Switzer asked the Safety Comittee to reconsider its previous reconwAndation that school signals be used to control traffic on 7th Street, and stop signs be placed at 61st Avenue Northeast, and asked that the school signals be removed and four -way stop signs placed at that intersection, because of Increased traffic and the fact that children walk along 7th Street. Mr. Swifter and members of the Committee discussed the reasons for the school signals and the reasons for the four -way stop instead of the school signals at some length. Notion by Weiss, seconded by Fritz, that the Committee table action on this request until the next meeting of the Safety Committee, so that the City could conduct a periodic traffic count on 7th Street and 61st Avenue. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Vice Chairman Linton declared the motion carried. SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY,�,7365 EAST RIVER ROAD: Notion by Fritz, seconded by Ssegda, that the Comittee approve the elimination of the south entrance as it now exists with the station to provide, in Its place, one entrance /exit approximately 14 feet in width which would be temporary until the County can construct a deceleration lane on property provided by the Superior Oil Company. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Vice Chairman Linton declared the motion carried. LETTER TO DON WSGLER: The Committee was advised that Don Wegler was interested in, again, becoming a member of the Safety Committee. The Secretary was to send a letter to • Mr. Wegler inviting him to rejoin. FRIDIEY SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES - OCTOBER 20, 1965 PA(Z 2 • DATE FOR PRLSENTA ?ION OF PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AWARD: Mr. Cohen asked the Committee to set a date for a formal presentation to the City of the Pedestrian Safety Award. The Committee decided that they mould try to set the date for said presentation for the December 15, 1965 meeting. NEXT MEETING: The next meeting of the Safety Committee vial be at 8.400 P.M. at the Fridley City Sall on Wednesday, November 17, 1965. ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn by Bendel, seconded by Szegda. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Vice Chairman Linton declared the meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Delores Bendel Secretary to the Committee n LJ 28 BOARD OF APPEALS METING MNUTES - OCTOBER 27, 1965 • The meeting was called to order by Chairman Navrocki at 7:30 P.M. 0 • ROLL CALL Members Present; Nawrocki, Fitzpatrick, Goodrich Members Absent: 3ankaaski, Saunders Motion by Fitspatrick, seconded by Goodrich, to continue this hearing until a report is received from the Planning Commission. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Navcocki declared the motion carried. The City Manager advised the Board that the Planning Commission had advised that the Board of Appeals handle this request in the usual wAnner. Mr. Bert Strimling, representing the operators of the proposed nursing home, was present. Notion by Good*icb, seconded by Fitzpatrick, to recommend that the Special Use Permit be granted, provided tht a stru etore _lea, 1pcated ccoding to they bite Ply, oreae+�ned. to tine Board. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chai.rm in Nawrocki declared the motion carried. t &D T: 29 There being no further business, Chairman Nawrocki declared the nesting adjourned at 7 :40 P.M. j Respectfully W matted, 1 Sa:' P. Wagne r Secretary to the Board U BUILDING BOARD MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 27, 1965 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kravik at 7:40 P.M. ROLL CALL Members Present: Kravik, Wallace, Tonco (Ward 2), Hauge (Ward 1) Members Absent: Herder (Ward 3), Ellis, Kirkham The Building Board looked at pictures of this structure and discussed the plans of the Jaycees with Bert Dahlquiat, Don Nelson, and President Roger Sandan, representing the Jaycees. Motion by Wallace, seconded by Tonco,� to recommend to the City Couacil a�rovaf of a movies permit to the Jaycees to move tie aforesaid structure into the Cit to be used as a temporary warming house at the Jaycee hocks rink on the Fridley Commons Park. Upon a voice vote, there 'being no nays, C irmaa iCiavi declared the motion carried. ADJOUR14MNT: There being no further business, Chairman Kravik declared the meeting adjourned at 7:58 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Earl P. Wagner Acting Secretary to the Board I0 130 0 31 THE PLANNING C=1ISSION MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1965 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kravik at 708 P.M. Members Present. Bergman, Johanson, Hughes, Kravik Bandel at 8 :15 P.M. Others Present: City Manager Wagner, Engineering Assistant Clark 1. MUEST APPROVAL OF MEDICAL CLINIC PLAN - DR. T. H. LESTER: Dr. Lester presented the proposed plans for the medical clinic and asked if the setbacks and parking areas were adequate. The Commission discussed the different.types of parking in the rezoning categories to determine which would apply to CR zoning. It was felt that when parking requirements are changed in land already zoned, the process in a little more difficult than it would be to establish parking peculiar to particular plat. During the discussion of determining the number of stalls needed for parking, it was felt that, because the nature.of the business, the parking would be different for each type of building. The setback to the north was 80" which was adequate. MOTION by Bergman►, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning _ Cori s on ae►:trove MOTION b the site plan of the Meaical caster dated September_, ry22, 1,96r 5 and per sen W at this meeting, relative to the parking: area,= and setba kg1of,px. T4 H� %ester, being the Narth 4Qf}� of the Wesct 21? 8�0® of Outlot 1. Melody =Manor 4th Addition, srubject to an eaaeasent o' -r thereof for street Puaperses. �Upoa a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. .. w ._ _ ._ ._,.. 2. DISCUSSION: REZONING REQUEST FOR BALANCE OF OUTLOT_1, MELODY MANOR 4TH ADDITION,, NIKE HAFNER: Kenneth Hafner, Mike Hafner, Jr. and Fred Rehbein were present. Mr. Rehbeiu showed the proposed plans for part of the area. These included apartment houses with underground parking, a motel with business stores on the ground floor. The Commission felt there was not enough area for the number of apartments in the plans and that they would prefer not having high density structures, as they believe there is an over abundance of rental units. • it was explained that the requestors could go through with a public hearing or come back at a later date with a different plan after further study. Mr. Reb.bein stated lie viould prefer to return with the request at the November 18, 1965 meeting, as he had received some ideas he could incorporate In his plans. THE PLANNING COMSSION MEETING MINUTES - �'VTOBER 28, 1965 PAGE 2 • MOTION by Bergman, .seconded by Hughes, that Item #2, request for rezoning the balance of Outlot 19 Melody Manor 4th Addition, Mike Ra£ner, be continued until the November 18th westing. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the notion carried. 3. SPECIAL USE PERMIT: NURSING 80ME IN OUTLOT 1 The building permit was sham at the meeting, but there were no plans available. Item #3, Special Use Permit for a nursing home in Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, Mike Hafner, was continued to the November 18th meeting. 4. 11ZONING PROPOSED PLAT Ca4MZRCB PLAT: MIRE BAFNER The plat of Commerce Plat was nevei completed because the State needed. so much right -of -way for T.H. #47. A discussion centered around the amount of land bordering the highaay to be rezoned and platting. The Commission suggested platting and rezoning. No action was taken. • S. CR ORDINANCE: DRAFTING F= ORDINANCE It was agreed that the CR zoning is restrictive requiring mare study., IZOTION by Bendel, seconded by Johanson, that Robert Hughes be asked to draft the full CR Ordinance for study and present at the November 18th meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 6. PLANNING COMSSION MZMGS FOR BALANCE CW YBAR: The Commission decided to meet an November 18, 1965 and December 16, 1965. ADJOURNMCNT: There being no further business, Chairman Rravik adjourned the mating at 9355 P.M. Respectfully submitted, C' Hazel 0 °Brian Recording Secretary � t 33 RECREATION CO MISSIOTMIMTING MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 30, 1965 • The September meeting of the Recreation Commission was called to order at SAO - P.M. in the Sr. High Teachers' Lounge by Mar. Jack Dunphy, Chairman. MEMBERS MWT: Vanphy, Johnson, Sampson, Sward OT'E18RS P$ESENTY Paul Brown MINUZ S OF THE MMTiNG OF AUGUST 26, 1965-. The minutes of the meeting of August 26, 1965 were approved as read. RBPCi;TS: Reports fray Park Sub - Committee, Council, and Board of Education were not available. BBPCRT FRCM PAUL BRMI . Paul Brown submitted a on m conebwa covering the details of the Fall program. He does not feel it will be.possibie to have a skating rink on the Hayes School location because of construction clean -up. She water hydrant is too far from Terrace Park in order to have a rink there. He has advertised for a choir director and accompanist, will also hire a leader for square dancing. • All asrange�mento have beau made for pant, pass, and kick. Goal posts have ben installed at the Commons and Riverwood. I& has compiled a list of all companies and businesses in Fridley, and will send letters to ties telling them of the recreation program and Inviting them to participate. Be has met with Mr. Larry Homer to discuss the American Legion Skating Progres, he hopes to conduct meets on Sundays with an exhibition meet Sunday, Jamtary 12, Pew No has met with Mr. Roberge, of Fridley Higb School, to discuss the development of a cooperative hockey program. Final figures of.atteadance at summer Recreational Program are as followei Registered: 2,220. Participation: 50,072. 1�7CT i�STING: Monday, October 25, 1965, 9 :30 P.M. at the Sr. High Teachers' Lounge. The meeting adjourned at 9:25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Jackie Sward Secretary to the Commission 3�. • FRIDLEr HOUSIFG AID REDLff W ila�T AITM 3RI`I`i M rING - OCTOBER tl 3, 1965 The meting was called to order at 8:25 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Richard Herder, Commissioners John Meyer, Paul Barrow, Lois Mullin, and Mcecutive Director Allan Anderson. Commissioner Robert Kendall arrived later in the meeting. Visitors: Doyle Mullin, J. R. Plemel, D. C. Harrington, and Drive Alberts of Hodne Associates. Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES .. MEETING OF OCTOBM 6, 1965 Mrs. Mullin made a motion that the minutes of the meeting of October 6, 1965 be approved as read. Mr. Fryer secondeesi the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passed unanimously. COMMUNICATIONS - G ROSSCI,OSE� WILLIAMS AIM ASSOCIATES • Mr. Anderson stated that he had received a telephone call from Grosscioso, Williams and Associates on October 13, 1965, indicating they we still interested in doing the re -uses appraisals and - a transient study for the University Avenue and City Center Project Areas. EXFlMIVE DIRECTOR'S RPPORT - URA AUDIT Mr. Anderson stated that a Mr. E1int of the URA had been in the Authority on October 7, 1965, to eae ine the books and avke recommendations. Although the overall report was favorable, there were two areas of work that must be completed: 1. Fatablish a revolving account for miscellaneous supplies, i.e. ' office supplies, ate., rather than the general journal as now being used. 2. Kkap time carols for Authority employees indicating amount of time spent on each project. A formal lettar indicating Mr. Blint's findings will be forthcoming from the URA in the near future. WaLMIVE DIRECTOR'S RT010AT - MENINGS The following meetings were attended by the Executive Director and /or members of the Commission during the past week. October 7 - Ministerial Association October 7 - FAvard Hamernik residence October 8 - Gene Chenatte residence • October 12 - District 14 School Board. October 12 - St. William's Church October 12 - Lion's Club 3:5 0 PMge 2 EXEMM DIRECTOR'S REPORT - ADDRESSOGRAPH Mr. Anderson listed the events leading up to the debate on the addressograph. "The CCFDR asked me to make arrangements to have the ad.dressograph made available to,them. I spoke with 14.r. Brunsell and he said it was alright if there was no charge to the City. The CCFDR came in on Saturday and were allowed to use the machine. There are three things to keep in mind in con- nection with thins 1. The precedent had already been set allowing the use of the machire by non- political groups. 2. There is no firm policy established by the City Council written or oral. 3. An i.- cavitation was also extended to TOM giving them equal time." Mr. Barrow rade the comtent that this has nothing to do with the Authority and is sololy between the Citizens Committee for Fridley Disaster Relief and the City of Fridley. RX9Ci1 MI DIRECTOR'S RPPORT - INVITATION OF PIANNIR C SSION Mr. Anderson stated that he will mend a letter to the City Planning Commission and other City Committees inviting them to attend a factual presentation on Urban Renewal on Wednesday, September 20, 1965, at 7:00 P.M. MISCHILLNA US - RECESS Chairman Harder called for a recess at 8:45 P.M. so Mr. Mullin could tale .picturea+ of the members of the Commission for a brochure. The meeting was resumed at-9:05 P.M. SPECIAL CONfMITTM RHPORT - HODNE BROCHM Have Alberts of Hodne Associates presented the plates for the proposed Renewal Brochure tor the Commission's review. After the Commission had made several minor changes in the text, the plates were approved. The discussion then turned to the printing bids received. Mr. Alberta presented price quotes from O.H. Da3hlen Printing Company and H.A. Rogers Printing Company on quantities of 3,u", 5,00v, and 7,000 brochures. An O.H. Dahien was the most reasonable for 7,000 brochures, it was decided to have thew do the work. Mr. Barrow made a motion that we authorize Mr. Anderson to buy 7,000 copies of this brochure an corrected showing the print in two colors and the cover in two colors and the rest black on white at a cost of $565.00 for the 7,000 copies. The approximate date of completion, folded and delivered, will be on or before 22 October. 3965. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Mullin. Upon a voice vote, there being no rVa , said motion carried unanimously. A question was raised as to - whether the brochures should be seat first class • or bulk rate mail. after some discussion, it was decided that there was not enough difference in price to warm-at sending the brochures hulk rate. 36 i is 6 1 MISCELLAMUS - ADDITIONAL DOCMUNTATION Mr. Meyer asked about the delay in receiving the additiona=l City Center docu- mentation. He stated that for a period of thaw weeks Mr. Hodne and Mr. Anderson had urged the Cosmmisisi.on to approve the additional documentation stating that it was absolutely vital to have this as soon as passible.. The Commission gave'approval to.go mad with the documentation three weeks ago and Mr. Hodne haws not as yet contacted Roger Johnson to inform him to go ahead with the work. He questioned what the delay seas. Mr. Alberts stated that he would talk to Mr. Hodne on Friday. OLD BUSINESS LAND DISPOSAL CCMKITTEE REPORT Mr. Borrow, Chaim of the Land Disposal Subcommittee, stated that the committee members gill meet next week for a discussion. OLD BUSINESS - EBITORI&L Mrs. Mullin stated that the editorial was not in final form yet but she would have it ready by October 15 so it could be attached to the minutes of the meeting WE BUSINESS - UNIVERSITY PROJECT AREA Mr. Anderson presented a map showing the proposed gas station placement in the University Project Area and a letter from Tom Hodne. The map indicates that the gas stations will conflict with time proposed service road plans. It was suggested that a letter be sent to the City Council for a definition of uhy, they have apr,. owed building permits (if they have) for service stations that will conflict with the proposed service road plans of the Authority when the City stated they were in favor of the service road plans . Chairman Herder directed Mr. Anderson to compose and bend this letter. Mr. Barrow asked if a clearer sketch of the map and as copy of the letter could be attacked to the minutes of the meeting. NEB BUSINESS - RESOLUTION- NO. . 1965 -20 Mr. Anderson asked the Commission to approve Resolution No. FHA 1965 -206 a resolution concerning the Acquisition of Real Property, stating that a resolution of this type is required by the URA before they can approve our S & P Application. There was some discussion as to whether a clause should be inserted in the resolution stating the relocation rigkts of the persons in the renewal area. T-ir..A:ndereson was directed to contact 1.1r. Wyman Smith in this regud. The resolution should be ready for approval on Friday, October 15, 1965. • Mr. Barrow sug,Wtesd that the Commission ask for a meeting with the City .Assessor to ascertain what the taxes will be on homes in price brackets other than only the $17,000 bracket. Mr. Anderson was directed to try to eat up this anoting for Friday, October 15, 1965 at 000 P.M. k�� d As there w.9 no Anther business, Mr. Heyer made v motion that the meeting be mourned. at 10:55 P.M. Tho motivn was seconded by Rr. Barrow and pwwee unanimously. Reepectfully submitted, Lois Milling Secretary Fridley Rousing & Redevelopment Authority Next xscJwdul ►d meting will be on Wedaeaday. f October '20, 1965, at 9:00 P -X- I! �s r FRIDLEY HOUSING AND RFZE7R,1OPME T Ai3MORI`1'Y DlEfffING - OCTGBER 20, 1965 The meeting was called to order at Q: u� P.M. ROB Present: Chairman Richard Herder, Commisvionere Lois Mullin and Robert Kendall, and Executive Director Allan Anderson. Visitors: Day* Alberts of Hodne Associates. Absent: Commissioners Paul Barrow and John Mayor. APPROVAL OF MIIMTFS - ITT ING OF OC T t3BER 13, 1963 Chairman Herder delayed approval of the miiautes of the meeting of October 13, 1965, until the next regularly scheduled meeting. BILLS AND COt M NICATIOPIS - CLLVEW D WRECKING COMPAi'4Y Executive Director Allan Anderson stated that he had received a letter from the Cleveland Wrecking Company dated-15 October 1965 stating that they war* interested in doing demolition work on the University Avenue Project. Chairman Herder directed the letter be filed for future reference. EXEMM DIRECTOR'S REPORT - PRESS CONFRWICE Chairman Herder stated that a press conference bad been held at 2:30 P.M. on October 2U, 1965, for WCCO -TV, WTCN- 7 and the Fridley Record. He stated that he had spoken with a reporter from the Miwreapoliz Star earlier in the day. The purpose of the press conference waz to an ofar charges made by TOUR in connection: with the August 11 letter from Gladstone Economic Consultants. SMUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT -- LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Mrs. Mullin stated that the Fridley League of Women 'Voters had taken a stand in favor of Urban Renewal at their meeting of October 19, 1965. She further stated that separate votes had beea2 taken on the different isem se with the lowest being approximately 38 pro end 6 opposed and the highest being approxi- mately 44 pro and 1 apposed. These votes approvod renewal in Fridley using City, State and Federal funds on all three projects. Mrs. Mullin further stated that she believed that the League is considering helping to inform the voters of Fridley on the issue of renewal and possibly handing out literature in favor of renewal. 38 ., L7J;C1JT1VZ DIREC'TOR"S RKPORT — SLIDE SHOW 3c.) , . Anderson stated that ho had seen the sl i a oh.ow p.-:epar d by the CCFDR and thou it an extremely wolf done presentation taking in all aspacts of the ronewal9 history, went problems, and proposed solutions. It is pro - renewal and anon - political. It was further stated that the CCI;MR is considering shoeing the slide presenta- tion to the general public on a continual besin if a. suitable location can be found, probably near the City Center area. EXECUTIVE DIRWTOR'S RWORT - BROCHURE STATUS Dave Alberts of Hodne Associates stateed that he had delivered the plates to the printer late Friday, October 15, 1965. There followed some discussion ae to methods of addressing and applying poste,p . Chairman Herder directed Allan Anderson to check with the City Hall and the Post Office to inquire whetbar we could use a postage meter at our expense. E='UTIVE DIRECTOR t S RbD'OitT - CHAZ+IM OF COMMERCE Air. Anderson stated that he will attend a luncheon Ming of the Fridley Chamber of Commerce on October 21, 1965, and give a pro rent al speach and show the CCFUR slides. Ho further stated that at this meeting he will comment on the report being distributed by Robert Christenson. The first 13 pages sera correct but pages 14 through 20 contain sfar>y editorial comments of Air. Christenson'ss that were not part of the original document as reviewed said approved by this office. AWOU EMM As there was no further business, Air. Kendall made a motion that the meeting be adjourned at 9:20 F.M. Mrs. Mullin seconded. There being no neye, said motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted. LOIS MULLIN, Secretary Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority 40 FRMM HOUSING AFv.0 Zr1S'1)2W.,C-�U-;VT AITURORIV N&TING - 0=6EER, 27, 1965' The mating was called to order at 800 P.M. ROLL CALL Preaent-, Chairman Richea-d 171erder, Commiacioners Paul Barrow, John Mayer, Lois Mullin &,,,id Robert Kendall, am-d Executive Director Allan Anderson. Violtoro: k%ve Alterts of Hodne Associates, IL-9. John Wright of the LWK, Bernie Black, Earl Tar, Xen X-navik, meat Powell and Harold Callomder of the Fridley, Jaycees. Absent: H6110 APPROVAL OF MINUTES) - �=UING OF 13 "OBE _122(1 Cbmirman Rich p--id Raider raa2d the rsinu-t*as of -the meeting of 13 October 1965- Mr. Barrow my a -totim that the urinates of the weeting be approved as read. nr. Kandzll seconded. the =-lion wad the minutes iivre accepted unanimously. APIPBOVAL OF M=KS - IrIE-01ING OF 20 22TOBKEI I ftra. Mullin maide a motion thr-t the miximtes of this meeting of 20 October be approved a,--, reoeivsft. lt. M-ondall aeconded the mot-ion and the minutes were accepted unanimouzly� d R OF Carbumals - Ir". BUCK Mr. Black's repoe6 umz =ved up on the aggenda enable him to leave early. .We. Black stated Un-at he thought Coz1voration Automobile Inmwanc* was neceavary becceaze, if an in4.iv-tdua1 1=ving, zun accident on compmy business W13 SUG1, tho corr.*ratior-, zalso �s f-Cw C% 1-sait, Hle Sitwested one type of inzura-uee szxlea Avzo, 4r l Zired Cc-we with a minimum qzvfflium of $21.00 a Yr, f o �Ie 00 � 000 500, 000 brAy wiul GOO, yroporty. This would cover onl;r zaplcyoetA arld *01,1z*ra of tIlE Author-ity. He quote& another t-1,Te of imnzu ran oe eatitled Coxyreherisive Gawral Liability that old take into con&idezatic�n nuy on Avithwity business and als.0 cover all Proyev-t-le-E4 ao%Ared by the Avthiority. This has a minim= Prewium Of $46.00 a yv�-xe wit;lh an aildit at tha end of the quarter on piroperties acquiretl dxncing t1v�, (1a, yter pir-licez qtlotl--d W�:4* foe 12motford Insursace. The qua-c-,,tioa um-8 to � Ihether Gova:n.,v--iant functioning body a*uld be nzed... Aftaxr V . B,&%-zow wsa directed to look into the MUM' and u*-ke a. i erort --t a lat4a date. BILLS AID COM-MICALTIO21S - EMUdAY DEPARTIM'IT, Bh,. Hey4r read a letter from the Right.-my Department to Farl Wagner concerning the propotod service road &I-la-me apt . This letter tjt&ted that maps had been sent to P 2 Mr. Wagner. It -woo- decidu-,,& to defaz a-3ticyx zuiti!- the was of November 8, 1965 assumLng Mr. Wegwr lmd received the pa- -.tints When Mr. Wasnor arrived lal-or' in the nazeting, h-e (sta-ted -1thst he had received the prints late Thursday arid L-iont thwi to the Da-,m--t&vnt to bo placed on plot mnaps. Efs nviy had the riniab-e- n,-gil,.to pmej P-fie2r reviewing them would fox-m-rd tl* prints to tl Council and -t a HHousing Authority. BILLS AHD COMMUNICATIONS - JL'hV STAND A brief resum' of evoxits concox-ning the s+,.Pxd on Urban Renewal taken by the Leegue of Woman Votes ,-s vao give'a- &—s. Mullin --tWZ&9ted that a leftar be sent to thto Lea�m�.e commndi-Z Vieza for theb! action. 1k. Anderson ww di-,mated to send the letter., BILLS AND CCIOM WICATIONS - LIMT -AL= *MCK GLAM`MXM The iien waiver from Gla4atone Associates on R-35 Feasibility Study was r*c*ived. Mr. Anderson stated that lie had reviewed it- and everything was in order. BILIS AND COMMUIC&LIOYS - Tr,1K"Y5QML-',S CWSER OF C(*DMCE A copy of the poliny state =nt of the Alf ixmeapolir, Chambtir of Cowwree on Urban Renew&l dated April. 1964 vas received. • M=UTIY.R DIRECTOR PS REPORT - CKATSFaq OF CO M--T-,CF I= LNG Mr. Anderson reg-d a copy of thfae- latter ht. had giezri to PL-. Torrey of the Fridley Ch&mber of Covmzrce end Save a 'brief xonma, of evento. leading to sending the letter. He stated that at the --peatilig with the Fridley Gh=ber of Commerce on October 21 he had shown -the slidea aAd read the :Minn -&Gpolie Chamber o.f Commerce resolution. He fort atatw! t he had riot daewmwl it, neceimary to read the letter :written to Mr. Torrey as tl-6.- repo l-t- by lie. Christakujon haa not been put into circulation. M=UTM DIRMTOR IS R]XYM'rL - BROCHURE K-JILING Mr. Anderzon stated that he h received tho brochures the morning of October 25. After checking with Mr. wu�g'�rkar and -%,yor Nee, concerning using the addressograph for an-1.1ing Irarpoaam mug L finding th-sm so-maiAa&t hezitant, he had contected United Maiiing to handle the -a&dra; sing ,o,-rd mailing of t-ha brachmi-es. Mr. Barrow stated that he objected to t2za City's balking at our using the addressograph and tboucjht that we had oireilr right to use tba machine an we are a City ftnotion. Mr. Kondall ,xdded that hip lbmiz a true atatement even though it was a logical political decision. This was the goneL--zl,fsq,'&ing of all the Commissioners and was expressed tu Mr. WhLspier directly vhen. he arrived. • 41 'it') ti. Mr. vnners s report waz Moved up on -th,� aaandwr to ens - �..e him to 'Leave tkae m- seting ea l.y. Mr. Wagner was asked to mom$ a report as a result of the PMA minutes of October 13 pertaining to action of tha Ciil-y Covncil co acLenii)s building permits. Briefly stated, at this point }me City I'vut r .s d; r� s ermi v,5ion for bath the Phillips 66 and Suaray DX service st tic�..s to on the south s...st exi d noriLheast quadrants of University Avanue ranpt ct ive l y even thou t ana t�yo approved locations mould conflict wit), the proposed ieali }.xed ".mice roads. However, nwither oz the stations Ivis received k es-mi anion fraa the Depaa tment for access to the present service road al:s_E ent . ?fix. Wagner ment.ior.Bd that P . 137right had eu ested sending the requested permits to tho Rousing Authority for re tevLl lout the s age- ati.on had not been brought up .spin. He presented copies of -the Cvc?,ncil a0tions of 9 -7 -65 and 9 -20 -65 regarding building permito for thet:e statiops and stated that basically the City had no legal rust to deny the pamni,ts. EXECUTM DIRE" I'0R u a RMRT a F:L.`UZiC!A1 STAT�:M11 Mr. Anderson presented a firancial report on R-3,1^ alad R -36 to the Commission and explained it in detail. He etstad that he will submit a report of this type on a quarterly basis. He teen suWasted that hv apply for the reining funds on the • Feasibility Study. EXECUTIVE DIIIEC` OR. °S R&'DOIT�' - STATUS OF MU MUiUA1.9 Mr. Anderson state -d. that he Md pierced a call to Washington concerning the URA m=uals and had bean tolc< that they wers out ai r.+• int but new ones were being made and would be in the aril in at-out th-eee marks -time. ECECMIVE YJ1ffl 3%W°S Rz RT - HMCF&LAINNU5 Mr. Anderson presented a suggested extendment. to the feasibility study to pay Mr. Elkin and requested pormisnion to eaxaft a letter for Mr. Norder's signature to requisition t1w sdditi.oraal finds in the for- of a contract awndment. He was directed-to do 00. He then presented. P. stat-istical breakdown by project of the thre ?e areas, and an historical perspective of Urban Renews.? , both prepared by Hodne Associates. Mr. Alberts stated then Mr. Roane hM epoken with Roger Johnson concerning the additi.owl narratives needed on the City Center rind learned. that Mr. Johnson mould be able to start work on. Wodneed&,y, Vovo bar 3. Mr. Mayer staked that to still did no-L understand the delay in riatifying Mr. Johnson. OLD BUSIIWS -- Fes. RF OIXTION 11965-20 • Mr. Anderson stated that he had received a call from Mr. Binford in Chicago stating that all four copies of Resolution No. FERA 1965 -20 had been loft and requostirW that they be resubmitted. Theses were put before the Commission for signatures. .. ,a, '; NEW WSTITYSS =AX RETURNS Fir. . ndorson wespated i., cope cif -0aa c1urx-terly- Incow. Tva retia--ne for -the Authority parsotuxe l to to L31G7, nod by Vz,° . B -ar ox; , the rea cxrcer . Mr. Anderson explain-ad that %a Rent will be at the Authority the morning of November 1, 1965 to .recoa ve p"ru nt for the first qu=ter Health Insurance premium. ^3r. K ndnll note a motion that wa approve peymont of the quarterly premium. Mrs. nlu71in oecion6o the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion poinsad inaiwouold . Fir. Anderson stated. -that he will take deductions from his paycheck of the end of the munth to pay for hies family powtion of -the insurance plan. MISCELLANEOUS Mr. Callander of the Fridley Jayeeas stated that at on PEA meeting he had attended three weeks ago it ws :s Btt tad that a letter would be sent to the Jaycees requesting their reasons for. taking ; a stand &gairzot rene .1, He wanted to know Vhy the letter bALd- not been reaeivad . T-Lr . . -�ndors on stated that, it was in the argil and should be received in -the very naox fi ture . Mr. Cal.lander then stated that, speaking for hinzalf, he thought "the people of Fridley vers very fortuirate to have a grows of people like yoursca ves. You have '* all worked very deliaeatly th,- °ou& all the, dirty diV, (etc4 that have been throun and it is: not ver;, often that you find such dedicated volunteers'::' Mr. Meyer thanked lb-. ftllandor amd stated that the Commission appreciated his counts. Mr. Powell stated that had receisred a copy of the Urban Renewal Brochure and thought it looked "Just A irae" . As there -,mz no Darth- r business, Mr. Kandallke a r,�tion that the meeting be ADJOURLKM An there ww no furthwz biasinesa, Zia'. Xerzdall wade a motion that the meting be adjourned. at Bu:t,c.. P.M. Yx. BLrror seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there bei.rg no naffs, acid rzot3on t,-as pasmed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Lois Mullin, Secretary Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority G North .5a6ur6ah .50ft tar y Fewer Aid met STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD MEMBERS Thomas Tautges - Chair Melf ord C. Christensen Donald Johansen Ray S. Johnston Vilas M. Nagel William Nee Ingram C. Rustad Lee Stauffer Mr. Earl P. Wagner, Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421 Dear Mr. Wagner: 781.2164 1458 COUNTY ROAD "J" MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5549E SERVING Blaine Coon Rapids Fridley Mounds View Spring Lake Park September 16, 1965 This letter is concerning the application and issuance of the North Suburban Sanitary Sewer District permits for sewer connections which will ultimately discharge to the District's sewer' lines. As the connection permit forms, which the District will provide, require the signature of a certifying officer of your community, the Board has requested that your Council appoint (by Council resolution), as certifying officers, two employees who will be authorized by you to accept connection permit applications and issue permits. As soon as these appointments are made, will you please submit the names to this office so the District Board may take the necessary action to ratify the appoint- ments. We are planning to have the permit forms in your office by October 1st, therefore, it would be best, if permits are to be issued after that date, to have the appointments made and submitted to the District office before our next Board meeting on September 28th. The community officers will, of course, be representing the District's interests in the issuance of the permits. It, is true that the community would have to process a permit in any event, but you may feel that additional work is involved in processing the permits in this manner and it may call for some additional compensation. If this should be the case, the Board would appreciate knowing it at this time. Very truly yours, NORTH SUBURBAN SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT Melfo C. Christensen, Clerk -� Mct:em 44 4.� MEMO TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City Council c MEMO FROM: Nasim Qureshi, City Engineer ` MEMO DATE: October 25, 1965 MEMO NUMBER: #65 -69 u Re: Street Surfacing Pearson's Craigway Estates 2nd Addition Dunkley Surfacing Company, Contractor Minder Engineering Company, Consulting Engineers for the above mentioned project, and the City Engineering.staff have inspected the streets under the above mentioned plat and have found them to be essentially completed and in compliance with the Plans and Specifications. We recommend that\the City accept these streets subject to One Year Maintenance Bond. NQ:ob CC: S. G. Pearson & Co., Inc. Dunkley Surfacing Company NASIM QURESHI, P.E. City Engineer • � L 2,344 No. Brookview Drive Minneapolis, Minnesota October 220 1965 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Minnesota Attn: Earl Wagner, City Manager Gentlemen: I would like to appear before your council meeting of November 1, 1965 in regard to my property at 350 Hugo St. NE. I have four lots, #10,11,12,13, Block A, Riverview Heights and two sets of water and sewer stubs were installed at which time I was not consulted and I am being assedsed for both. Lot #10 and #11 is not regarded as building lots and I would like to have the said lots rescinded from the assessment rolls. Lots #12 and #13 has the house. Please advise if this is satisfactory to appear — before the council meeting, Nov. lst. Very truly yours, M E M 0 November 5, 1965 TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager FROM: Marvin'C. Brunsell, Finance Director SUBJECT: Special Assessments on Lots 10, 11, 12 and 13, Block A. Riverview Heights Addition . With reference to the letter of October 22, 1965 from Mr. Richard. L. King on Lots 10 through 13. As I understand it, he is asking for an abatement of one of the two building site charges on the four lots. These assessments were put on in the year • 1960. There are many building sites in that area that have one service for 50 feet and this would cause somewhat of a problem if an abatement were granted, as then the whole area would probably have to be reconsidered and many more abatements granted, and the difference made up by a tax levy. is r f 46 F1 INSPECTION HAS BEEN APPROVED FROM THIS DEPARTMENT AND THE $500.00 PERFORMANCE BOND MONEY RETAINED BY THE CITY CAN BE RELEASED TO MR. MISTELSKE. SIGNATURE ,.�, �,�,/ALLEN G. JENSEN, BUILDING INSPECTOR 4PPLY: SERVICE AMOUNT aaG IS7Z&, vE. /ilpls.,lylidh. S�'43 a 9-� • TOTAL � 8 �3• a i r•,'A RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the County of Anoka and the Third Congressional District'are not fully represented in the State Legislature inasmuch as the said County and District have a disproportionately large population in light of their representation and, WHEREAS, said disparity between population and representation is both unjust and unlawful and, WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Village of Circle Pines to indicate that it has taken a position favoring a redistricting and more equitable apportionment of representation. NOW, TEFAEFORE, be it resolved by the Wuncil of the Village r� y� of Circle Pines that the Village of Circle Pines does hereby approve, encourage and request all measures necessary,to remove disparities in representation in the County of Anoka and the.Third Congressional District and to remove such disparities that may exist between the said County, District and other counties and districts in the State of Minnesota. Adopted by thq Village Council on_ this Tth � of gc )+A*er , 1955 . Parkview Elementary School 6085 Seventh Street N. 8. Fridley 21, Minnesota October 289 1965 City Council City of Fridley Fridley, Minnesota Dear Sirst The reason for this letter is to ask if you would consider returning the corner of blst and 7th Street to the Four-Way- Stop it once was• Because it is our children that must use these streets and this corner,'we feel we have a lot at stake here* We dontt know for sure just how many school students cross this corner every day.but-from 1500 to 2000 would be a conserva- tive number. At Parkview alone there are 900 and of course this doesn't include the Senior High and Junior High. Because of our lack of sidewalks all students attending the Parkview School must use the streets. This in itself is not a good situation but it is the best we have. Now if 7th Street is allowed to be turned into another Mississippi Street we will be entering into a contract that none of us want• The stop signs might be a deterrent to speeders. If they know they have to stop at this corner maybe they will use University or Highway #65. We feel that every child should feel the security that every vehicle that comes to the corner must stop. At the present time traffic can move from Mississippi Street to 53rd unobstructed. It appears that traffic is starting to move along this street at speeds that are excessive of the speed limit. We'have the makings of a fine parts along 7th Street, also. ill • Arjy child wishing to cross the street weekdeys during hours that the present ]light is not working, weekends, and during the summer, must do so at his own risk if the situation is allowed to remain the way it ise We feel that the blinking light should be removed and a. Four - Way -Stop installed. Any consideration given this letter will be greatly" appreciated• Respectfully submitted# PARKPIN P•T.A• Marion Weisman Secretary HALL, SMITH, HEDLUND, DUSTER, FORSBERG AND FEIKEMA ATTORNEYS AT LAW DOUGLAS HALL October 25, 1965 a 11 PRODUCE BANK BUILDING WYMAN SMITH GEORGE HEDLUND MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 88408 989.1481 LEONARD T. JUSTER THOMAS O. FORSBERG - OFFICER IN: HENRY H. FEIKEMA O88E0 RONALD L. HA8KVITZ COON RAPID■ FRIDL[Y Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Re: Tardy Lateral Assessment Dear Earl: _ A property owner has complained to Councilman Kirkham that he pur- chased a house on the East River Road some six years ago. At the time of purchase there was no lateral assessment for his sanitary sewer. ,:He now is selling his property and discovers that without notice to him, an assessment has been filed on his parcel for a lateral assessment. • It appears that.the actual lateral connection was made directly to the interceptor and had been made several years before his pur- chase. I would take it that through some over - sight, the lateral assessment did not go on following the connection. Apparently, there is no questions but what the lateral service was received. The primary question is whether or not the Statute of Limitations that applies to contracts, namely 6 years, would be applicable against the City of Fridley on this assessment. First, it is my opinion that the Statute of Limitations is not properly a defense to the making of the assessment. I did rule the other day that it would apply to water rents or sewer service • charges. Such rents or charges are debts and the Statute of Limi- tations would apply to them. The special assessment, on the other hand, is a lien on the property that the city gets for furnishing a benefit to the property. There are some mitigating circumstances in this situation that would justify the City Council in making some adjustment for the instant assessment. In the first place, it is the view of myself and other municipal attorneys that the provision in Section 429.051 permitting the municipality to subsequently reimburse itself for a portion of 97 - U -2- Mr. Earl P. Wagner October 25, 1965 the cost of improvement by levying additional assessments and not previously assessed is lawful. In other words, there is strong argument that once the municipality makes an assessment upon a particular improvement, that it cannot later make a valid addition- al assessment even.though this particular statute purports to give it such authority. This property has as a benefit both a lateral and a trunk sanitary sewer. It was assessed for the trunk initially but not for the lateral and yet the trunk served as the lateral. . Further, I would take it that no actual notice of the lateral as- sessment was given the property owner. I presume the assessment was made before the Supreme Court decision in the St. Louis Park case that requires mailed notice or actual notice to the property owner. Since the St. Louis Park case, the notice outlined by the Court has been followed. The law that is applicable by reason of that case was always the law, even though not the practice up to the decision. The Supreme Court has indicated that where such notice was not given the city did not have proper and appropriate jurisdiction to make the assessment. 1 Consequently, the City Council may in its discretion make some adjustment with this taxpayer, or this citizen, but it should be pointed out that whatever action is taken may be a precedent to other and similar situations. Yours truly, Wyman Smith WS /rac . cc: Mr. Marvin Brunsell, Finance Director 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55421 53 M E M 0 November 4, 1965 TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager FROM: Marvin C. Brunsell, Finance Director SUBJECT: Sewer Lateral Assessment - Lot 1, Block 4, Ostman's Third Addition With reference to the letter from City Attorney Wyman Smith dated October 25, 1965. I am giving you the following additional information: To date no sewer lateral assessment has been levied. On October 13, 1965 a special assessment search on the property was requested. This search indicated there would be a future sewer lateral assessment inasmuch as no lateral charge had ever been made. The sewer and water permit for the house in question was taken out on August 29, 1956 by Otto Ostman. The sewer connection was apparently made directly to the sewer main on East River Road. We have checked the records relative to any special assessment searches which may have been issued on the property. The first special assessment search on the plat was issued in 1957. We find that up to October 13, l 1965 no special assessment search had been made on this property. The other special assessments levied against the property had not been paid up to the time the first search on October 13th was made. The other assessments on the property were paid on October 26, 1965. Back in 1956 the policy was to levy the lateral assessment on property that abutted on the main line at the time they connected rather than at the time the main line was installed. In 1956 there was a very limited amount of help and a very limited amount of record keeping, and this is probably why the connection was made- without it being discovered that there was no sewer lateral assessment on the property. Also at that time there was no central cross reference card for checking special assessments as there is now. It should be pointed out that the practice now is to check the special assessments before a sewer and water permit is- issued., -• r: 54 • C L A I M S r� u General and public Utilities 6894 through 7016 7926 through 7989 t�a EST " TO . X . D BY ° =� � CMWIL - NOVUM2 8,f 1965 Keys Woll Drilling Co. 4413 loo.. LcKiAgton Party St. P1., Xlrxnesota 55104 Estimate #7 - Water IMr t Project No. 75-A (Partial) (Three Additioexal Drift Wells) 110812.28 Estimate #8 - Water • IWarovennt Project No. 75-rA (Partial) (Three Additional Drift wells) ; 18395.90 F. D. Chapman Construction C 289 Alab&ma Avenus Minneapolis,, Xiiunesota 55416 Estimate #4 - Sanitary Sw= and wafter Improvement Pro j east go. 70 (Partial) (Riverview Terrace, south of Mississippi Placer Linc=oln (A.sbton) Street, so.zth of Ironton Strut; 5th Street, -south Of T.B. $ 4,190.15 ro D. Chapman Canstruction Caqmwy and Raidall a Berglin ( A Joint Venture) 2809 Alabama Avenue Xinneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Estimate #3 - Storm Sewer MWovement Project No. 73 and SanitAry Sewer, Mater and storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 73-A (Partial) (54th & Innsbruck 5th Addition) 2,345.31 HUX10y Cansf.�ictioun Company 48 faignal Hills St. Paul, Minnosryta 55118 Sst!Awte #6 - Sauiitary Sewer and Water 7 aveme. ;: pXo3oct loo. 67 and 8texm sorwer gov t Pro; ect K-:%. 68 419644 Saritary - Sover, wager, and sto= seweZ construction ( see Paga 7S of c;a-incf meetaaQ agsrda for s�►p�,a�er 1'., '! 354 fa:: io.:a�i:a.) ;F.'.r.�al) $ 3, 215.48 15 ESTl 'ES TO BE JVPRr 9D BY TH3 C17Y C©UMIL - AOVZNM P, 1365 (Contled) Perry A. Swenson Company, Inco rpOrated 432 Zndicott Build ;.aig Ste Ps. "Xi a Minnesota 8stimte #2 (Partial) ToXade► DGUAge A Fridley iron Removal Pl &nt, Fridley Well Houses #10 #3,.#4 $ 9,599.90 D. We Harstad Cosy, I=* 7101 Highway #65 NoabUheast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 8stima►te #1 (Partial) Torv.ado Damage - .aivil Defense Building - Assessor's Office $ $1.94 Estiunts #1 (Partial) Teat!® DOM 90 • Shorewood Lounge Estimate #1 (Partial) Tornado Damage 375 -" 54th Avame X.E. Estia.B.te #1 (Partial) Tdo Die Fridiey e^, ity Hall 0 $ 1,679.60 $ 500.94 $ 6,276.97 COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. • Consulting Engineers 1446 County Road "J" Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 0 September 28, 1965 Honorable Mayor & City Council c/o Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6432 University Avenue, N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421 Gentlemen: CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We submit herewith Estimate No. 6, the final estimate for Burley Construction Co., 49 signal Hills, St. Paul, Minnesota 55118, for work completed this date for construction of Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement Project 67 and Storm Sewer Improvement Project 68, according to contract. Contract Bid Price $156,873.39 Adjustment Submitted by Burley Constr. Co. letter of 8/4/64 (Lift Station) (Deduct) 978.00 Adjusted Contract Price $155,895.39 Change Order No. 1 (Add) 1,019.29 Adjusted Contract Price 3156,914.68 ADDITIONS TO CONTRACT 135.1' 8" VCP 10-12 811.6' 8" ESVCP 0 -10 644.3' 8" ESVCP 12 -24 179.0' 8" ESVCP 16 -18 3.4' 15" Cl. II RCP 0-10 175.6' 15" Cl. III RCP 0 -10 23.0' 21" Cl. III RCP 12 -14 35.0' 21" Cl. III RCP 14 -16 69.0' 21" Cl. IV RCP 16 -18 1 Standard Manhole 10 -12 l Standard Manhole 14 -16 1 8" x 8" x 6" Tee 1 8" x 6" Reducer 1 8" rI 450 Bend 2 6" CI 11 -1/0 Bends 1 6" CI plug 9 Trees 6" - 12" 1 Tree 18" - 24" Total Additions $ 5.20 - $ 702.50 4.95 - 4,017.42 5.60 - 3,608.08 6.50 - 1,163.50 4.80 - 16.32 4.90 - 860.44 8.75 - 201.25 9.35 - 327.25 10.15 - 700.35 308.00 - 308.00 396.00 - 396.00 42.50 - 42.50 22.00 - 22.00 30.00 - 30.00 22.00 m 44.00 8.00 - 8.00 50.00 - 450.00 100.00 m 100.00 $1.2,997.61 122997.61 C C1 • City of Fridley -2- September 28, 1965 Est. No. 6 - Hurley Constr. Co. Sub Total. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $169,912.29 DEDUCTIONS FROM CONTRACT 348' 8" VCP 0-10 @ $ 4.95 - $1,722.60 783' 8" VCP 12 -14 @ 5.60 - 4,384.80 52' 8" ESVCP 10-12 @ 5.20 - 270.40 295.8' 8" ESVCP 14 -16 @ 6.00 - 1,774.80 310.3' 8" ESVCP 18 -20 @ 7.55 - 2,342.76 27 8" x 6" Wyes @ 7.00 - 189.00 713' 6" VCP Services @ 2.60 - 1,853.80 11.3. 12" Cl. II RCP 0-10 @ 4.50 - 50.85 121.6' 15" Cl. III RCP 10-12 @ 5.15 - 626.24 29.5' 15" Cl. III RCP 12 -14 @ 5.55 - 163.72 46.0' 15" Cl. III RCP 14 -16 @ 6.00 - 276.00 16.5' 21" Cl. III RCP 0 -10 @ 7.70 - 127.05 46.0' 21" Cl. III RCP 10 -12 @ 8.10 - 372.60 38.1' 21" Cl. IV RCP 14 -16 @ 9.55 - 363.85 2 Standard Manholes 16 -18 @ 440.00 - 880.00 2.74' Outside Drop Manhole @ 24.00 - 65.76 5.4' 4" CIP Force Main @ 2.35 - 12.69 96.4' 8" CIP Watermain @ 4.20 - 404.88 58.7' 6" CIP Watermain @ 3.30 193.71 1 6" Gate Valve & Box _ @ 95.00 95.00 2 6" CI 22 -1/20 Bends @ 22.00 . 44.00 13 Curb Stops & Boxes @ 15.00 - 195.00 13 Corporation Cocks @ 5.00 65.00 489' 1" Copper Water Service @ 2.20 - 1,075.80 4 Wet Connections @ 50.00 • 200.00 11.75 Cu.Yds. Cone. Reaction Back. @ 30.00 - 352.50 59.9 Cu.Yds. Found. Corr. Material @ 6.00 - 359.40 311 Sq.Yds. Bit. Repl. @ 2.75 855.25 80 L.F. Sidewalk Removal @ 1.00 80.00 40 L.F. Sidewalk Repl. @ 3.00 - 120.00 1517 Sq.Yds. Sod @ 0.70 " 1V061.90 18 Trees 12" - 18" Dia. @ 75.00 - 1,350.00 Total Deductions $21,929.36 21,929.36 Sub Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$147,982.93 Overtime in accordance with supplemental agreement of September 22, 1964: 66 Hours Mach. Oper @ 2.15 141.90 66 Hours Mach. Oiler @ 1.70 a 112.20 59 Hours Pipe Layer @ 1.85 - 109.15 60 Hours Pipe Layer's Helper @ 1.825 - 109.50 Sub Total $ 472.75 0 • r� U City of Fridley Est. No. 6 - Hurley Constr. Co. Sub Total (Overtime) -3- September 28, 1965 $ 472.75 18X Payroll Taxes & Insurance 85.10 Total for Overtime (9 -22 -64 through 10 -1 -64) $ 557.85 Total Contract Price Less: Estimate #1 Estimate #2 Estimate 03 Estimate #4 Estimate #5 $ 20,512.74 32,311.67 41,438.28 38,332.19 12,729.82 557.85 $148,540.78 Total Paid to Date $ 145,324.70 145.324.70 AMOUNT NOW DUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 30216.08 We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement Project 67 and Storm Sewer Improvement Project 68, and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. We recommend that the final payment be made upon accep- tance by your Honorable Body, and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on the date listed above. RLJ /cb cc: Hurley Construction Co. Respectfully submitted, COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. By E. V. Comstock, P. E. G' v U DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 University Avenue Fridley, Minn. November 1, 1965 Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minn. 55421 Re: Pa ent to Debris Clean Up Contractor '._. Partial Estimate #1 Dump Cleaning Payment to Contractor . Gentlemen: Partial payment Estimate No. 1, Julian M. Johnson - and Ted Renollett Contractors, 6725 Channel Road, Fridley, Minnesota for work completed this date on cleanup of the dump on 73rd Avenue and East of University Avenue. Dump cleanup to date $18,875.00 Less 5% Withholding 943.75 PAYMENT THIS ESTIMATE $17,931.25 NQ : ob CC: Julian M. Johnson Ted Renollett Respectfully submitted.- NASIM QURESHI, P.E. City Engineer GI U UST OF CONTRACTORS LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL November 8, 1965 GAS SERVICES Domestic Pleating Company, Inc. 9110 Grand Avenue South s Minneapolis.. Minnesota bye Hartley G. Gruder GENERAL CONTRACTORS Ives Construction Company 7934 Able Street N.Eo Spacing Labe Park, Minnesota bye Ives Boisvert ` Norseman Construction Company 621 Lilac Drive North Minneapolis, Minnesota bys Earl D. Johnson John Shanderick Construction Co. 7321 Tempo Terrace Fridley, Minnesota by: John Shanderick, 8 Strande Construction Company 4074 west Broads Robbinsdale, Minnesota bye Earle Strande Dwight Swanson Realty & Const. Co. 3710 Zenith Avenue North Minneapolis 22, Minnesota by: Dwight Swanson HEATING CONTRACTORS C. 0. Carlson Air Conditioning Co, f 709 Bradford Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota bye John C. Jenkins Doarestic Heating Company, Inc. 9110 Grand Avenue South bys /Gruder Minneapolis, Minnesota Hartley Go Moore Plwgdng &-Heating Co,. 1048 Osborne Road NPE, Fridley, Minnesota �' bye Marvin F.jMoore PLASTERING CONTRACTCR Rick Plastering Caapany 3734 Auger Avenue North White Bear Lake, Minnesota bys Willi L. Rick i f RE2iP,WAL RZJ RENEWAL rd-4 NEW !s 62 �t3 Page 2 LIST OF CONTRACTORS LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL November 8, 1965 PLLMING CONTRACTOR Eastman Plumbing Company 4236 Madison Street N.E. Minneapolis 211, Minnesota bys Bruce S. Eastman RENEWAL SIONHANGING CONTRACTOR Lents Sign Company 133 East 26th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota by: Berwin Lents NEW OTHER LICENSES SOLICITORIB LICENSE Fridley -Heights Carpet Cleaners 6366 Pierce Street N.E. Fridley, M mesata bys 1warence J. Mal &nsy NEW • SERVICE STATION LICENSES Roman ' ®a Fure Oil Station 5695 Heckmann Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota by: Roman L. Trautt TAL Wilfred Oil CompwW 3709 Marshall Street N.Ea Fridley, Minnesota by: Fred Be Vye RBNEWAL r 64, LIST OF NMTIPLB DW=130 TO BE L1C=SED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COURM NOMOSER 8, 1965 SUMMER 11 1964 4 szrr it 1 1965 NAME AND ADDRESS S OF APT. BLDG. APT, UNITS M PAID Albin Johnson 6624 Ewing Avenue North 5810 = 2% Street N. C. Minneapolis, Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 4 $10.00 Anna & dark 8asten 4700 Lowry Terrace 564o m 7th street N. S. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 11 $11.00 Anna & Mark Aasten 4700 Lowy Terrace 5612 0 7th Street N. E. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley-21, Wmmsota it $11.00 - National Rentals, Inc. 4720 m 42nd Avenue North 5848 - 2nd. Street N. E. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota "8 $10.00 National Rentals, jar.. 4720 m 42nd Avenue North 5924 - 24 street N. 8. • Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 7 $10.00 National Rentals, %6c.- 4720 ® 420d Avenue North 5666 - 2nd Street N. C Mimeapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 4 $10.00 -- Draw L. Scharer 6525 0 2nd, Street N. E. 6525 m tad. Street N. X. Fridley 32, Minnesota Fridley 32, Minnesota 7 $10.00 O v o ® o o � m o p O o � W o a O o W o O . r e - " e O o m o m o W W- W MlRURA DWVL=r, L%C=SES TO W APPitO' W BY CWK41L M P OD a 9/1165 9/1/66 David K. Grantsburg 5384 - Stb Street N. E. Wecomin Fridley 219 Minnesota 4 Wtoo Edsassd A. Anderson 5808 Decatur Avenue No. 6061 W.2ad. Street N. E. New Be"" Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 4 $10.00 Newman R. Atlas 3900 Ewing Avenue South 4939 - 3rd.8treat N. Z. Minneapolis 10, Minn. Fridley 21, Minnesota 7 $10.00 Nensos A. Atlas • 3900 brim Aveme south 4921 m 3rd 8trest N. 6. Wuneapolis 10, Minnesotan Fridley 21, Minnesota T $10.00 NW(AlU L4 Floyd C. Bretdl,ey • 5861 West Moore lake Drive Fridley 21, Minnesota 5908 G 2k Street N. 8, 21, Fsidloy Xinnasotx4 7 $10,00 Floyd C, Bradley 5861 Want Moore Lake Drive 5900 - 2k Street N. X. Fridley 21, Minnesota rridley 21, Minneetote 7 $10.00 Floyd C. Bradley 5861 Weest Moore Lake Drive. 5916 - 24 Strut N. 8, Fridley 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 7 $110.00 Benmy B. Drown Route 4, Box 368 137 Mississippi !lace Osseo, Minnesota Fridley 210 Minnesota 4 $10.00 Arvid R. Carlson & son,inc. 3200 France Avenue South 5200 - 3rd St. N. E. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21., Minnesota 11 $11.00 Arvid Le. Carlson b Sonjne. 3200 prance Avenue South 5201 - 3rd St.. N. R. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota IL1 $11.00 Arvid B.Carlseni b Son,Yne. 3200 France Avenue South 5230 0 3rd St, N. R. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota It $11.00 �- • Arvid R. Carlson & Senl,Yne. 3200 France Avenue south 5231 - 3rd St. N. 8 Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 11 $11.00 Arvid R. Carlson i Son,lnc. 3200 France Avenue South 5260 0 3rd Street N. 8. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 11 $11.00 — Arvid L.Carlsene & Son,Ync. 3200 France Avenue south 5261 a 3rd Street N. 8. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota it $11.00 - Arvid 8, Carlson is Sen glac. 3200 France Avenue South 5290 0 3rd St. N. Z. Minneapolis,- Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 11 $11.00 Arvid 6.Carlson & Son,lnc. 3200 France Avenue South 5291 - 3rd Street N. R. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21. Minnesota it $111.00 Arvid B.Carlsom & Son,llac. 3200 France Avenue South 215 - 53rd Avenue N. 9. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 4 $10.00-, Arvid 8, Cartoon le Son, Ync . 3200 France Avenue South 305 - 53rd Avenue N. E. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 7 $10.00 / GG • "EWT-1199 VwmmwS COm 1 PAGE 3. Arvid E. Carlson A son,2nc. 3200 France Avenue south 5100 Morison Drives R. Co Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 219 Minne<ota 5 $10.00 Arvid E,. Carlson, Inc. 3200 France Avenue South 5101 Horizon Drive W. E. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 7 $10.00 10 Christenson fig*! 2nd St. v. s, 6541 0 2nd street R. E. Fridley 320 Minnesota Fridley 32, Minnesota 5 $10.00 - -- Robert R. Conley 5336 Bryant Avenue South 6393 Highway #65 R. E. Minneapolis 19, Minn. Fridley 21, Minnesota 7 $10,00 Leonard X. Dailey 8251 Cast River Road 8251 East River Road Fridley 32, Minnesota Fridley 32, Minnesota S $10.00 Irving Efrou 3025 Sales Avenue South 262 - 57th Place N. s. • Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 8 $10.00 Donald Fleigl& 6060 0 2k Street M. R. 6060 - 2% Street N. E. Fridley 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 4 $10.00 , Willias R. Gottwaldt 6300 Baker Avenue M. E. 6341 Highway #65 N.N. Fridley 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 10 $10,00 Eugene E, Lashinski 1035 Polk place M. z, 4030 Main street Y. E. Minneapolis 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 3 $10.00 Joseph A. Laurent 5800 ® 24 streets. 6, 5800 n 24 street; N. E, Fridley 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 4 $10.00 Robert W. l evaedoeski 1411 - 46th Avenue Worth 3347.49 0 4th at. M. E, Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 3 $10.00 C. H. Miller 1095 Polk Circle M. E. 4985 a 3rd Street N. K. Minneapolis 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 11 $11.00 C. R. Miller 1045 Polk Circle M. e. 5005 m U4 Street N. to- Minneapolis 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 11 $11.00 6 • MU LVV" DMLIMS 4C= ) PAGE 4. Paul Z. gymark 5604 Sherwood Avenue South 105 - 58th Avenue N< Z. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 7 $10.00 Kenneth F. Peterson 2661 Lyndale Avenue South 6019 main Street V. 1. Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 4 $10.00 Donald C. Russ 190 = 59k Way N. E. 191 a 59k Way N. R. Fridley 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 12 $12.00 Donald C. Russ 190 - 594 Way N. X. 190 0 59k Way Nn E. Fridley 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 12 $12.00 Richard E. Thill 427 Lafoud 6379 Highway #65 N.C. St. Paul, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 8 $10.00 (Richard Z. Thili 427 Lafond St. Paul, Minnesota 6417 Highway #65 1. E. Fridley 21, Minnesota 8 $10.00 Sunnyside Apartments Vohn D. Miller 47 Rice Creek Way 4965 n 3rd St. K. I. Fridley 32, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 11 $11.00 William J. Toeller 10449 Arrowhead St. N.W. 430 Ironton Street V. R, Coen Rapids, Minnesota Fridley 32, Minnesota 3 $10,00 Waino W. Datiaen 6347 university Ave. N.C. 5025 . 3rd Street A. E. Minneapolis 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 11 $11.00 Donald C. Wascom 35 Ambassador Avenue 117 Mississippi Place Lockport, Illinois Fridley 21, Minnesota 4 $10.00 William L. Zater, Jr. 6212 Carol Drive V. X. 5761 s 2nd St. N. Z. Fridley 21, Minnesota Fridley 21, Minnesota 3 $10.00 • G8 TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY Mr. Earl Wagoner, City Manager City Council of Fridley Gentlemen: In regards to extending Jefferson Street to 58th, Avenue N. E. we would like to have the following work performed.► 1. The balance of the trees removed. 2. The street put on line. 3. A surface:-,of clay and gravel or a similar hard surfacing. The property owners agree to share the cost of the surfacing if the street is kept plowed in the winter and enough maintenance in summer • to make driving permissible. We; the undersigned, being a majority df the property owners, offer this letter as a petition to have the above work .completed as soon as time permits. Sincerely,' Mr. X en Brya4t r Mr. C. H. Benjamin O' 96 S-" PETITION FOR WATER, SEWER LATERALS AND STREET SURFA' • FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 19 A To the City Council of Fridley, Minnesota: We, the undersigned, constituting more than fifty -one per cent (51 %) of the property owners in number and in interest, in the following streets: Street, from ' to - %% 'S �t, Z _Street, from 52' 1 2 D � to%, � e d Street, from to who will benefit by the proposed improvementp hereby petition that the following im- provements be made. 1. cl- �— 'i D - A 2. •We understand that the cost of said improvement will be assessed against the property in the above described area in equal installments for a period not to exceed years with interest payable at the rate of % per annum on the unpaid balance. 1, � y We understand that, until preliminary engineering can be completed, it is impossible to give accurate estimates of what these improvements will cost,* but that based on cost figures for similar work done in the City, it is estimated that these improvements will cost: 0 � 1. -� 2. 3. i i 69i . �.r VIP�1 ` fi j"� APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT n� CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA WNER'S NAME BUILDER ADDRESS_ _ Z Z ADDRESS LOCATION OF BUILDING NO. STREET S PART OF LOT LOT BLOCK ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION CORNER LOT INSIDE LOT. SETBACK SIDE -YARD SEWER ELEVATION FOUNDATION ELEVATION Applicant attach to this form Two Certificates of Survey of Lot and proposed building locatio draws on thes ificates. ` DESCRIPTION OF 'BUILDING To be used as: Front Depth _ Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Front Depth ,Height Sq. Ft. Cu. Ft. Type of Construction Estimated Cost To be completed The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work,in strict accordance with the City of Fridley Ordinances and rulings of the Department :of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct, DATE _2 — — SIGNATURE (Schedule of Fee Costs can be'found on the'Reverse Side). 70 • MEMO TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager MEMO FROM: Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant MEMO DATE: November 3, 1965 MEMO NUMBER: #65 -70 RE Development of Lots 3 & 4, Block 1, Horizon Heights The owner of these lots has, for some years, been trying to develop them into useable building sites. In 1962 Mr. Weldon Wahl did meet with the City Planning Commission and City Council to ask for help in the cost participate of serving these two lots with sewer, water and street surfacing. It was generally agreed that the City would join in with the cost of platting, street surfacing and the improvement of a drainage Swale. This cost to the City was esti- mated to be approximately $1,800.00 Recently Mr. Dean Goetze of Odell - Peterson Realtors, who is trying to sell or develop Lots 3 and 4 for;Mr. Wahl, has given us a letter stating that Mr. Wahl would sell the lots to the City of Fridley for $2,000.00 iThe tax status on these two lots is as follows: Lot 3: No delinquent taxes. Unpaid specials in the amount of $96.00 are still pending. Lot 4: Delinquent taxes are $43.46 plus 8% penalty, totalling $46.94. Unpaid specials in the amount of $101.68 are still pending. Therefore the total amount of taxes, including specials still pending on the two lots, is $244.64 making .a grand total cost of $2,244.64 for the two lots. The lots could be utilized as per separate memo from Paul Brown. Therefore if the City did purchase the lots, the approximate cost over and above the cost to the City to help develop Lots 3 and 4 into private build - ling site would be about $444.64. ( L aAA -JUJ Dar-f9l Clark - Engineering Assistant .r. I 0 560 -3450 (:its of grictley ANOKA COUNTY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 Mr. Earl P. Wagner City Manager City of Fridley, Minnesota Dear Mr. Wagner: November 4. 1965 After personal observation of Lots 3 and 4. Block 1. Horizon Heights, it is the opinion of the undersigned that this property could be developed with little effort into a • neighborhood tot lot. With clearing the land of weeds and tall grass plus installation of a swing set, slide, sandbox, and park benches, this could be a great addition to this particular area of the City of Fridley. There are two steep hills involved with this property that would make great sliding and skiing areas for Winter activities. The Parks and Recreation Department appreciates your consideration in this matter* 7aul lye PBB /gs own. Director Parks & Recreation Department 0 '"lam S-roP.A.6 E vo Q s N a a �� 1$ T r Q o - J1► � I 3 3( h h � � a PaoFOSfo To �k�r�a �b�,m •r Or- L errs 1-4 "-�oc.K.. I �4 ovwz o,s �l Ssa1e. _ A ODELL - PETERSEN REALTORS • BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS CENTRAL INVESTORS BUILDING TELEPHONE 761- 618 i?tx - 1425 November 1, 1965 Mr. Darrel Clark Fridley City Offices 6431 University Avenue N.B. Fridley, Minnesota - 55421 Dear Mr. Clark; 3037 MOM CENTRAL AVENUE, N. E. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA This letter is a verification of the conversation which we have had pertaining to the two lots next to the Water Tower in the Marion Hills Addition, otherwise known as Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Horizon Heights, I have talked with the owner of this property, (Mr. Weldon Wahl), and he has agreed to a sale price of • $2,000.00 cash for the two lots in question, if the trans- action of said lots can be completed before January 1st, 1966. spectfujl�ly y urs, M� Dean H. Goetze DHG;mw • F s43 RIDLCr • UNIVEgstry aiVE N.r R E C E I V ED AAA Nov 2- 1965 718#9j1I)MI121142.3 is L. 6 0 ml! w MY OF HaDHEY OFFU& STPEET W NtJt�H 31,MG4 f�'`_) APPLICATION FOR SIGN PEA FEE -$4.00 Location 7325 Central Ave. N.E. Permit Ito. Fridley, Minn., October 22 ,19-0— FRIDLEY INSPECTOR OF BUIMINGS: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein speci- fied, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rul- ings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and re- presentations stated in this application are true and correct. Owner Fridley American Le ion - Kind of Building Brick • Used as Retail Vork to be completed about ASAP. Estimated Cost $400.00 ignm WoUld be ins a on Folex on Private Property. DESCRIPTION How Installed: Flatwise on Extended out from Wall Roof Dimensions: Length * 6f t. , Height 4f t... Thickness 611 Distance from Sidewalk Roof. Constructed of: Iron, Wood, Iron and Wood Plastic aND Metal Illuminated g Wiring Application No. Si BY ! 3 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT • Permit No. Location Highway 65 at Missisni p ;_ Gr . Fridley, Minn., Oct. 28- FRIDLEY INSPECTOR OF BUIMINGS: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein speci- fied.' agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rul- ings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and re- presentations stated in this application are true and correct. Owner - Country Club Market, 1201 E. Lake St., Hopkins Kind of Building Concrete and steel Used as Store Work to be completed about Nov. 15 1965 19L.-L Estimated Cost $ 1,000.00 Individual steel letters reading "Country Club-Market" orir outh side and west side of building. Mounted on steel supports thru roof of bldg. DESCRIPTION "How Installed: Flatwise on Extended out from Wall Roof beach letteri Dime`nslor s Length 3 , Height 5' , Thickness 2" Distance from Sidewalk 255 sq . ft . per side Roof Constructed of: Steel Iron, Wood, Iron and Wood Illuminated Wiring Application No. Signe BREDE, INCORPORATED, 2211 Broadway,N.E. - G6,47 77 :;111 RESOLUTION NO. , 1.11 1965 • A 'RESOUITION CERTIFYING CHARGES TO THE CGUM AUDITOR TO BE LEVIED At•" NST CERTAIN PROPERTIES FM COLLE MON WXM THE TAXES PAYABLE IN 1%6 WHEREAS, a nuisance condition has been found to exists on Lot I# Block 2, Central View Mawr, and ii40OtBA3, the Omer of such propexttw Was g1van notice to abate such nuissnca, and MUREAS, the owner of such property did not ethate such nuisance and the m7 of Fridley, wader authority of Section 145.23 Minnesota State Statute of 1953 did therefore ante the nuisance at a totral coat of $145.00, NOW# TUSRSFOBB as IT RESOLVED, that the City Clark is hereby auttherised and directed to cictifF to the County Auditor for collection with tine tax" paya%le In 1966, the ebarges as listed below: Lott; 1, Block Z, Central View Kamm Rema red old house and old sheds: $145.00 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CM COtMIL OF THE CUT OF FRIDLEY 0 TM DAY OF , 1965 ATTEST: am C - Marr1i C. swunsell C MOOR - VIM=— 3. Nee 78 7( 1 ,y September'23: 1965 b mr. r:alter Freeman 395 Vississippi :inneapolis, Nvinnesota Dear 'Mr. Freeman: You are hereby requested to abate the following public health nuisance. 1110 73•'2 A.v©. X. E. (Lot I. Block 7'., Central Viow Vanor t.dn.) . \Please remove dilapi- dated dwelling unit from property, and fill in foundation. Vhen you have completed the work to the satisfaction of this noard you may submit your bill to the City Clerk as provided for in .Iinnesota Statutes, 145.23, 1953. Very truly yours, James i . Hensley cc: Marvin Bruns ®11 ,pity of Fridley Board of Health City Vigr. RESOLUTION NO „ 1965 • A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOT 8, PARCELS 1710 AND 1750, AUDITOR'S SUB,, #25. WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, as follows: That the assessment levied against the following described parcels, to -wit: Lot 8, Parcels 1710 and 1750, Auditor's Sub. #25, may and shall be apportioned and divided as follows: Original Parcel Fund Original X unt W.400' of E.800' of Lot 8 Reg. S&W -- Aud. Sub. #25 (1710) SW38 $ 930•'"3 SS40 Mains 495,36 SS 53 3!•.52 E.400' of Lot 8, Reg.S.A. 250.72 Aud. sub. #25 (1750) SW38 (2 services) 1095.19 SW38 930.03 SSW �481.97 $4,348.82 Division of Parcel Approved Fund Original Amount W.400' of E.800' of Lot 8, S1,138 $ '930,03 Ex.pt.to School, SS40 44 }.47 Aud. Sub. #25 (1710) SS53 35.52 E.400' of Lot 8, Ex.pt.to Reg. S.A. 199.98 School, Aud.Sub. #25 (1750) WS38 (2 services) 1,195.19 WS38 930.03 SS40 343.65 Part of Lot 8, Parcel 1760, Reg. S.A. 80.74 Aud. Sub. #25 (School Dist. SS40 190�11 #13) $4,348.82 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1965. MAYOR - WIlliam J. Nee ATTEST: 0 CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunseli 80 NESOLUTIOAI A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND D ECT THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL A;SES31SMS ON PARCEL 9300v SECTION #24, 4-.= OF Sq LYINr, SO. OF x7.100 (EX. W.11000 ),q SECTION #24, PAPZBL 10, SBCTIO� #252, OUTLOT I, MISBRUCR, 2ND ADDITION AND OUTLOT 29 INNSBRUGK., 2ND ADDITION. VdH&aAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been subdivided,, NOW % TIB; WORE BE IT RESOLVED, as fol.lova s That the levied against the following described parcels to- wittPhrcel 9300s Section #24s SW of SEA 3yinn8 So. of Hy.100 (ftaW. 190061, Section #24, Parcel 10, Section #25, Outlot 1, Innsbruc�.k, 2nd Addition and Outlot 2a Innsbruakp 2nd Additions my and shell be apportioned and divided as follows: Origin Parcel .. ai A� Zo Parcel 93009 Section #24 Regulaar S. A, $ 3.9469.25 Std #16 (Area Interceptor) 1058.18 SW of SEt lying S. of Hy. Regular S. A. 277.51 #100 (EZ.W, 11000) Section #24 &rcel 109 Section #25 Regular S. Ao 109345.42 SW #16 (Area Interceptor) 69222,00 Outlot 1, Innebru*#2nd Regular S.L. 2,869.41 SW #16 (Area Interceptor) 1,149979 • Outlot 2, Inns'bamak,2nd Regular S. A. 29253.24 SW #16 (Area Interceptor) $ 260658,70 D vil— A- io" . Dina AAMTW INA Orl&'WA.8 mt Plat of Innebru&O 5th Addition $ 17921JE.83 SW #16 � (AreeeInterc4tor) 9.413.87 $ 260658.70 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 19650 • NEW ifi].liam J. Nee ATTESTS CITY Tiza Marvin C. Brunsell 1 • ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF LIFE, LIMB, HEALTH, PROPERTY, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND THE OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS OF RESIDENTIAL BUILD- INGS AND PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF AND TO BE KNOWN AS THE "HOUSING CODE" AND DESIGNATED AS CHAPTER 51 OF THE CITY CODE OF FRIDLEY: . The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Section 51.01. In order to provide minimum requirements for the protection of life, limb, health, property, safety, and welfare of the general public and the owners and occupants of residential buildings,:•.there is hereby established a Housing Code for the City of Fridley and is desig- nated as Chapter 51 of the Fridley City Code. Section 51.02. Uniform Code by Reference. That subject to such exceptions, modifications and changes as noted herein, the 1964 Edition of the Uniform Housing Code publ�ished by the International Conference of Building Officials is hereby adopted by reference and established as the Housing Code of the City of Fridley. Section 51.03. Repeal of Existing Code. Any code or regulation heretofore in effect in the City of Fridley and any provision thereof which is contrary to or inconsistent with the provisions of said Housing Code and the exceptions, modifications and changes as noted herein, is of no further -force and effect immediately upon the effective date of this chapter, and the same is repealed. Section 51.04.• Exceptions. The following exceptions, modifica- tions-and changes in the provisions of said Uniform Housing Code are made with respect to said Code and shall be in force in the City of Fridley: (a) The Planning Commission of the City of Fridley, as pro- vided for in chapter 40 of the Fridley City Code shall constitute the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board as provided for in Section H -203 of said Uniform Housing Code. (b) The penalty for the violation of this chapter shall be the penalties provided in Chapter 105 of the Fridley City Code and not the penalties set forth in Section H -204 of said Uniform Housing Code. (c). Building Official. The City Manager is hereby designated as the Building Official as provided for in the said Uni- `form Housing Code. The City Manager is authorized to designate one or more of the officials or employees of the city as _Deputies. 1 • LJ (d) Multiple Dwellings Registration. This Chapter shall not be construed to repeal any provision of Chapter 49 of the Fridley City Code concerning Multiple Dwellings. (e) Dangerous Buildings. This chapter shall not be construed to repeal any provision of Chapter 50 of the Fridley City Code concerning Dangerous Buildings. Any provision in this chapter dealing with rights and remedies for unsafe, dangerous or hazardous structures shall be considered as being supplementary to the rights and remedies under Chapter 50 or under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.39 to 462.401. Passed by the City C6uncil of the City of Fridley this day of 1965. ATTEST: Marvin C. Brunsell, City Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Publish: William J. Nee, Mayor r i I E. SUBJECT Moore Lake Beach House Heating Units for bathrooms DATE Nov 8 0 1965 -Friciley-J,arks and ..R.e-c-r-e,a.tion-D-epartment,-,re ques-t-pe to enmDlAte installation of two (2) 50.000 B.T.U. heaters and__j)_l_9werz_a_t,__tbB�_ -go, for thin winters uggia. It has been recommedded by the builder-ILr,])r-em-Zc-her.er--that.-we--ins.... 11 the two ar-ause,.. SJIMD'tump d its freessing -----he a te rs-before —thi s --- wi. ter _s,eas-on., s ets-in-b up.if there is no heat, Also, -,As-p lam%d,,..,txe each serva as a v arm J_ ng ho:as.e....and-j-t-.-woula-.be.... nic-a-to. _ makp.__use...cLf__the.. tnilpts-all- during - 9b wi inter. With heat in the bathrooms as planned for, it seems that we shoikld 1prp -Nide-for the pump and the akaters. To comQlete this Droject it mould-lake-$450 to $50 dollars, Our up to date budjet, figures show that we h$ve this .amount. SIGNATUO"'/"'_ Pa W L Y: • n U AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT entered into this i� day of November, 1965, by and between the CITY OF FR IDLEY a nd the CiTlf OF MAINE: WITNESSETH: Q 3� The parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual promises, herein agree as follows: 1. The City of Blaine agrees to pay to the City of Fridley a share of the cost of a�---e necessary and feasible improvements to County DitchA7 insucb� � proportion as storm waters originating within the City of Blaine from outside of the designated Ditch #17 watershed area shall contribute to the total flow to the county ditch at point of improvement. 2. The City of Fridley agrees to approve the Resolution adopted by the County Board of Commissioners of Anoka Coun ty, adopted r permitting the City of Blaine to discharge water into County Ditch #17. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals on this _.day o 1965. IN PRESENCE OF: THE GM OF SIAM BY It s Mayor BY It s City Manager • pAM A1,D 1'`LAyGB.WIDS SUB-CCHKrME MUTING MINUTES - OCt'OBEK 18, 1965 The mantl,ng was cabled to order at 700 P.M. by Chairman Hughes at the City Fall. MMi=S PUMMTs Hughes, Cochran, Sampson MEMBERS ABSWT's Skjervold, Donlin OTNW PRESENTs Gene Peterson, Hodne Associates Paul Brower, Parks and Recreation Director The minutes of the meeting of September 20, 1965 gore approved as received. UDC, S� Read the cataaiques from Hodne Associates - Re: Proposed cost of plan for development of Locke Park plus utilisation study, GMM PETnSO11 Delivered a !-teak down of proposed plan for Locke Park. 1. 'diet goverment aid programs can this area qualify for! 2. How may it fit into Fridleyo v seeds? 3. Long rage plat of full part developed into seaall areas of work. • Photographs of Locke Park as it is today Vero shown to the Committee. MOTION by Cochran, seconded by Sampson, that there be a delay in hiring a planner for Locke Park at this time. Services for a planner are not needed beacuse the work required in the park in the laneediate future vill be dictated by the damage done by the tornado and the sever construction project. 3AMY -18 Recreation Commission Notes: Covered memorandum of events coming up this fall and winter. No action is needed at this time by the Parks and Playgrounds Sub- Committee. SUGHESS Planning Commission Notes: Planning Commission approved the hiring of a full time Parks Superintendent. ,,y,I , pecog gd by Cochran. that, oy, 5cheeK2r,. paik Discussion.- Mr. Roy Scherer started with the City of Fridley as • a police dispatcher June 14, 1963. He then vas hired by the Parks Department April 15, 1964 at $2.25 an hour. On June 30, 1.964 his hourly rate increased to $2050 an hour, his present rate of pay. Mr. Paul Brown feels he is a value to the depart - ewne and recomends this increase. • PAS AND PLAYGROUNDS SUB- CWHITTZE MEE& NG, OCTOBER 18, 1965 PACE 2 FUMY PARK: MOTTLO11 by Cochran, seconded by Sampson, that the Committee instruct Mr. Brown to contact the Flanery heirs and assure theca their gift can be applied solely to the improvement of Flanery Park, make arrangements with them for receiving their gift, and to request suggestions from the family for use of the gift. USE OF PROPERTYS MOTION by Sampson, seconded by Cochran, that after inspection by Mr. Brow of the property offered for recreational use by a Mr. Morris Deshaine of wit Gear Company , and found acceptable, the City accept this offer. NOTE; Letter of agreement for use of this property should be drawn up by the City Attorney. PROPERTY PURCHASE-. Property in Heights Addition, Lots 3 and 4, are available for purchase as park property. Members of the Committee will look at the lots for consideration. A decision will be made at a later session whether or not the property is desirable, iADJ'OURNMT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:35 P.M. NEXT NXTING DATE- The next meeting will be Tuesday, November 16, 1965 at 700 P.M. in the City hall Respectfully submitted, Paul Brown Director of Parks and Recreation Department n �J CITY OF 1 "T.RID'`LEY POLICE DEPARTMENT • Monthly Report - September, 1965 Cleared or This Mo. To Date This Mo. T1.48 Yr, or Pence ding Last _Yr. * Last Yr, COT4PLAINTS D ^mestic 4 72 72 6 86 Assault 10 9 1 2. 11 Drunk: 1 5 5 4 Diso, Conduct 4 29 27 2 2 26 Liq. Laws Z 6 6 4 9 Firearms- 5 5 1 1 Res. Arr Other 13 127 116 11 19 260 JUVENILE Assault 3 10 7 3 I 4 Diso. Conduct 5 43 40 3 1 Liq: Laws 2 21 21 16 Firearms 5 3 2 2 Runaway 4 40 40 5 18 vandalises 21 113 58 55 20 165 Other 11 100 95 5 7 129 Robbery 2 1 1. 2 Burglary 9 60 17 43:.. 6 67 Theft .Over $50 18 148 32 116 10 104 Under $50 17 215 88 127 20 191 Other 27 301 ;52 49 70 ��8 MOTOR VEHICTZ MilenTo Gas <i ®P P. G. dense $ C Unit #24 1,571 184 8.5 44.49 .028 Unit ,#25 5,176 620.2 8.3 261.50 •050 . Unit {#26 4,407 506.6 '8.6 152.317 .034 Unit #28 29933 216.3 11.5 67.54 .023 Unit #29 5,778 650.1 8.8 185..1.3 .031 This month To date ACCIDENTS Thies s Mo. This Yean Last Year. Lases t Y a Personal Inj 17 128 13 132 Prop Damage 25 210 21 161 Fatal 1 2 1 RADIO CALLS 336 2657 220 2666 ASSISTANCE TO Motorists 65 394 33 272 Other P.D. 12 76 10 98 Fire Dept, 1 13 2 35 Medical 8 100 17 161 TRAFFIC ARRESTS Speed 46 259 81 379 I D .IJ. I . 2 ` 24 8 48 Open Bottle 7 4 22 Careless Driving 8 42 6 84 Reckless Driving 1 1 DA Susp 4r Rev 20 7 38 DA other 2 35 9 76 Signs & Signals .9 75 17 36 Parking 20 109 47 110 Other 8 159 7 146 D.O.M. TESTS Ours 2 2 23 Others 24 I JA IL Our Prisoners 16 199 21 227 Other Prisoners 8 96 37 168 • CITY OF FRIBM, MINNESOTA OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR TOPIC: MONTHLY REPORT TO CITY MANAGER OCTOBER, 1965 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION Residential Residential Garages Alterations 4 Additions Multiple Dwellings Commercial Industrial Municipal. Churches Hospitals Signs Moving NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED 1965 1964 THIS YEAR LAST YRAR OCTOBER OCTOBER TO DATE TO DATE 13 22 140 206 26 20 144 111 25 6 869 44 2 0 4 16 3 2 15 5 1 0 2 7 0 0 1 0 i Schools 1 0 3 3 0 0 1 .0 2 6 37 19 1 0 4 1 7 56 1,220 Heating 43 29 398 358 Plumbing 57 32 426 336 Electrical 127 65 981 495 27 126 1,805 1, 9 �VALOAT;(XS OF BU=IW PERMTS ISSUED Residential Residential Garages Altataticns is Additions Nbatipl• DWIRIngs Commercial Induatrial H anicipal Churches i Schools Hospitals signs moving 205,560 $ 342,000 $ 2, 461.,130 $3, 389, 785 37,154 38,273 208,193 177,770 1620745 249250 8,405,084 84,000 480,000 -0m 526,500 1,396,000 290,000 54,000 1,110,788 889,000 30,000 -0- 230,000 568,000 -0- G0m 14,500 roo�w 831,300 =0- 2,089,295 661,320 a.Ov -0- 2,000,000 .00 1180 2,700 28,130 7,830 2t240 y0- 22,740 +0° f2,039,179 $ U1, 223 7.096,360 $7,M.70 U REPORT TO CITY MAUGER OCMM, 1965 NUMBER OF LICENSES CURRENMY IN AFFECT AND LIC=SZ FEES COLYABCTED TO DATE TYPE IPM FEES COLLECTZD Q4iCTR=CAL 76 a 1,140 ZMVATUG 27 405 GAS 45 675 GXW AL 291 7,275 HEATING 65 975 HOUSE "Mm 3 45 MASONRY 34 510 OXL HZATIM 6 90 PEASTUIM 19 285 PL11MMQ 74 1,110 ROOF!m 10 150 sum 16 240 WU L DRYLIHG 2 30 668 $12,936 P E R M I T F E E 3 1965 1964 THIS YEAR LAST TZAR PS T HERS TYPE OCTODER OCTOHn To DATE SO go #8502•#8575 Dt1UMIN 1,733 $ 865 $199310 $11,429 #5610 -0736 U DCTRTCAL 1,422 739 12,351 70,809 43392 -#3434 HZATING 696 664 3,507 6,008 #3844443900 "main 820 613 6,967 5,517 7 24 0 81 0 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1965 - 6 :00 P.M. ROLL CALL: 1. Canvass Of Election Returns of November 2, 1965, 2. Estimate - F. D. Chapman Construction Company and Randall & Berglin (A Joint Venture) - 2809 Alabama Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 #2 - Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 73 and Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 73 -A (Partial) (54th & Innsburck 5th Addition) $57`576.9 •1 � ADJOURN: 0 i r COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. •Consulting Engineers 1446 County Road "J" Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 October 13, 1965 • E Honorable ?Mayor & City c/o Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota Gentlemen. Council City Manager N.E. 55421 CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit Estimate No. 2 for F. D. Chapman Construction Co. and Randall & Berglin, (a joint venture), 2809 Alabama, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 for work completed this date, for the construction of Storm Sewer Improvement No. 73 and Sanitary Seger, Water and Storm Sewer Improvement No. 73 -A, according; to contract. Ctamnleted Work 1625 LF 8" ESVCP 0 -10' deep @ $ 4.10 $ 6,662.50 1200 LF 8" ESVCP 10 -12' deep 1 @ 4.25 5,100.00 677 LF 8" ESVCP 12 -14' deep @ 4.35 2,944.95 629 LF 3" ESVCP 14- 161deep @ 4.60 2,893.40 149 LF 8" ESVCP 16 -18' deep @ 5.10 759.90 27 LF 8" ESVCP 18 -20' sleep @ 6.10 164.70 20 LF 8" CIP S.S. 0 -10' deep @ 5.80 116.00 50 LF 8" CIP S.S. 10 -12' deep @ 5.95 357.00 320 LF 15" C1. 11 RCP 0 -10' deep @ 5.35 1,712.00 191 LF 27" Cl. II RCP 0 -10' deep @ 8.55 1,633.05 94 LI7 27" C1.III RCP 0-10' deep @ 8.85 831.90 13 LF 27" C1. III RCP 10 -12' deep @ 9.00 117.00 389 LF 27" C1. III RCP 12 -14' deep @ 9.45 3,676.05 283 LF 27" Cl. III RCP 14 -16' deep @ 10.50 2,971.50 20 Ea. Manholes 0-10' @ 275.00 5,500.00 6 Ea. Manholes 10-12' @ 320.00 1,920.00 . Ea. Manhole 16 -18' @ 410.00 410.00 1 Ea. Manhole 18--20 ° @ 455.00 455.00 16,25 Ft. Drop N.H. Conot. @ 42.00 682.50 82 Ea. 8" x 6" Wyes @ 12.00 984.00 2830 LF 6" VCP Sozvice Line @ 2.30 60509.00 577 LF 4" cip Tvorce main @ 2.85 1,644.45 1 Ea. 4" 450 Dead @ 25.00 25.00 2 Ea. 4" 22 -1120 Bends @ 25.00 50.00 2 Ea. 4" 11 -1/40 Bends @ 25.00 50.00 • 0 City of Fridley Est. #2 - No 73 & 73 -A 4581 LF 6" CIP Watermain 7 Ea. Hydrants W /Valve 8 Ea.16" Gate Valve & Box 3 Ea. 3" Gaze Valve & Boa 11 Ea. 6" x 6" x 6" Tees 3 Ea. 6" x 6" x 3" Tees 3 Ea. 3" x 2" Reducer I Ea. 6" 450 Bend . 4 Ea. 6" 22 - -1/20 Bend 1 Ea. 6" 11 -1/40 Bend I Ea. 6" CIP Plug 68 Ea. Corporation Cocks 68 Ea. Curb Stops & Boxes 2289 LF 1" Copper Service Lime 1 Ea. Wet Connection -2- Total Work Completed Less:10% Retained Amount Earned to Date October 13, 1965 @ $ 3.10 $14,201.10 @ 320.00 2,240.00 @ 100.00 800.00 @ 60.00 180.00 @ 42.50 467.50 @ 57.50 172.50 @ 30.00 90.00 @ 42.50 42.50 @ 42.50 170.00 @ 42.50 42.50 @ 10.00 10.00 @ 8.30 564.40 @ 16.00 1,088.00 @ 2.15 4,921.35 @ 30.00 30.00 $73,189.75 7.318.98 $65,870.77 LesQoLstimate No. 1 82294.58 MOUNT NOW DUE* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 . . . $57,576.19 Respectfully submitted, COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. By E. V. Comstock DCO /cb cc: F. D. Chapman & Randall- Berglfn • STATEMENT OF CANVASS GENERAL ELECTION 2 Ncrfieaher 196 DECI:ARATION OF RESULTS THEREOF in accordance with Section 4.08 of the Chanter of the Cite of Ptcidley9 the CitT Council declares the results of the 1962 GeasTal Election to 'be as follows: A. The toted numbew of &C110ts cast was: 33� 2 0. Ward 1 - Precinct. 1 404 Ward 1 - Precinct 2 8,27 Ward 1 - Precinct 3 793 Wxrd 2 - Precinct 1 all Ward 2 - Pteciact 2 989 Ward 3 - Precinct 1 227 Ward 3 - Pracinct 2 571 Ward 3 - Precinct 3 X358 P -1 312 TOTAL: __- __,o_� 2320 B. The votte for each candidate and number of defectilTe and not voted ballots is as follows: CITY - MAYOR • P -1 W -1 P -2 W -1 P -3 W -2 P -1 W -2 P -2 NOT VOTED W1LLTAX J. NU JACK O� KIRKHM WRM -XN QOR DEF.. TOTAL Mrs. W -1 P -1 1266 a1410 �. 7 Am 9 -1 P -2 eS7S 3 Oz_ Sg 4 ..§27 W -1 P -3 3 xf _ 457 1*iere --.-193- W -2 P -1 312 S23 _ __- __,o_� 16 , 8Ml W -2 P -2 318 A27.. ,.�..�..__. ... -. _ I... W -S P -1 M 32 q 721,.._ W -3 P -2 129 _ A3R- - - - - -J A _.�_...r.... W -3 TOTAL: P -3 138 216 9t1A1 1t ... mil.:. ^� W -1 P -1 W -1 P -2 W -1 P -3 W -2 P -1 W -2 P -2 W -3 P -1 W -3 P -2 W -3 P -3. GLENN W� TYSON c 1TY - cound IRAN -AT -LARGE DAVID 0. HARRIS x68 401 464 231 675 A 211 I s NOT VOrl'SD WRYTE -1N Z3_„� 22 }4 989 A �--- 5 35A... TOTAL r - 1734 - - 1 - SIN_ A ` P &ge 2. • U 0 W -1 P -1 113 W -1 P -2 234 W -1 P -3 276 W-2 P- a 265 W-2 P -2 . 253 W -3 P -1 200 W -3 P -2 122 W -3 P -3 92 TOTAL s 1555 YES STATMENT OF CANVASS C — CITY CENUR PROMCT NO 29Q .�,H -9 AO-4 730 515 4�5 2�1 NOT VOTED &/OR DEF.. 4 13 4rrsar�r. 12 - -4 — - CITY - UNIVE8Srff AVENUE PROJECT W -1 P -1 108 W -1 P -2 221 W -1 P -3 273 W -2 P -1 259 W -2 P-2 235, W -3 P -1 -� 202 W -3 P -2 128 W -3 P -3 ill TOTAL: 1537 W -1 W -1 W -1 W -2 W -2 W -3 W -3 W -3 P -1 P -2 P -3 P -1 P -2 P -1 P-2 P -3 VIS NO 293 603 5O8 ,.� 745 _.. $�.16 441 244 3938. NOT VOTED Qe/OR DEW. 3 12 4 -9 - -- 9_ _ 2 El 45 CM - RtMVIEW HEMMS PROJECT TOTAL: 1436 NOT VOTED & OR DBFs 4. ..... 4..._...:. ..�r3... 10 4043 41 TEAL 404 827 793 � a51 ..... _,.571 .. 358 TOTAL 827 793 851 ' -989 .._. �.. 57._.. 1 .._.._ .- ....312200 ..�. TOTAL 252... uT®gW 3. ` I'll BMENT OY CANVASS CWT - NORTH SUWRBAN Sb' rMY SEWER D� 3RXCT 8ee84 of Trustees - Memo t I!EBe COUNCi T -AT -LARGE mid Oo Harris D. The Bond Election on the City Center Project is hereIr declared defeated. Z. The Bond Election on the University Avenue Project is kwe* declared defeated. F. The Bend Electt;icu on the Rinewlew Heigh%@ Project is kersby declared defeated. MELFORD C. NOT VOTED JAMS Lo DECKER CHRX.MNSEN WR E-XN &&R DEFT TOTAL W -1 P -1 179 i8 2 404_,.v..® W -1 IP -2 329 43I 67 827 W -1 P -3 342 364 733._ W -2 P -1 346 439 , Asi W -2 Pm2 .. 4Q? 51 � 984 6Y -3 P -1 .314 -- 44 ]��.� W -3 P -2 266 265 571 W -3 P -3 _ 158 176 2* 22 358 TOTAL: 2336 ® 2.733 * W -1 P -3 5ori,derski - 1 * W -2 P -1 Charles E. Johanson - 1 'Groig - 4 Pat Nelson - 1 Mss. Wegler - 1 * W2_ P-2 Hanson - 1 Schaaf - 1 Heine - 2 Allen - 1 Elmer Johanson - 1 Colo Hoffaoaann - 1 * W -3 P -3 St. Andrew - is Kurak - 1 C, The following officers �oe�se declared elm: • MAM - Jack 0, Ki4rkhm COUNCi T -AT -LARGE mid Oo Harris D. The Bond Election on the City Center Project is hereIr declared defeated. Z. The Bond Election on the University Avenue Project is kwe* declared defeated. F. The Bend Electt;icu on the Rinewlew Heigh%@ Project is kersby declared defeated. Pago 4. STATEMENT OF CANVASS . G. The following are bme copies of the ballot used: • OFFICIAL BALL 07 CITY ELECTION CITY OF FRIDLEY ANCKA, COUNTY, MINNESOTA TU E S DA Y, N 0 V EMBER 2, 196S MAYOR VOTE FOR ONE. TERM THREE (3) YEARS. COUNCILMAN AT LARGE VOTE FOR ONE. TERM THREE (3) YEARS. JACK O. KIRKHAM O. WILLIAM J. NEE GLENN COUNCILMAN AT LARGE VOTE FOR ONE. TERM THREE (3) YEARS. DAVID O. HARRIS GLENN W. THOMPSON PAIge S. STATBMisAiT OF CAWASS OFFICIAL BALLOT C IT Y ELECT 10 N CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA TU E S DA Y, N 0 Y EMBER 2, 196S VOTE ON ALL THREE If you favor the proposal, put an (X) in the square opposite the word "Yes ". If you do not favor the proposal, put an (X) in the square opposite the word "No ". 1 CITY CENTER PROJECT SHALL THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE ITS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS IN AN Yes AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $380, 357.00 TO PRO - VIDE FUNDS FOR PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS, RECRE- ATIONAL, COMMUNITY, EDUCATION, WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, OR ANY OTH- F-1 ER WORKS WHICH IT IS OTHERWISE EMPOWERED •r+r'_ -Dr__rTTRNf_Si3E - ADTAC -FNT TO 6 0 STATUX dT OF CAWYASS H-, The sees of the judges of elecUou are as faRowo: turd I FrecincC,- R Mrs. Donne Marcucci Mrs, Unnice Defti,es Mrs. Mary Miller Mss. Shirlvy Golsen We. George No-non )&sB Earl Follmutb Mrs. Hart "v Hanna mss. Janice Pettit Mks'. Xng Sivertt;s Mz � ego Gsanneq Mss. Jacqueline Bowy Mrs,, x-rd Schulte Mrs Helen Fowler MTs. Helen Bourgeois HT A. . Marian WeekAey Ward I - Precincts 2 Mrs. Mary Schreiner Macs. Harriett; ilhhan Mrs. Joyce McClellan Mrs, Blaine Enroth Mrs. Warren Olson Itiso Doris Nyline Mrs. Carol Lueder Mrso Morons Chase Mrs. Fern Conor Mrs- Don Heckathorn Mss. Joanne Rage Mrs. William Jensen Mrs. William Hensstles Mss. Dorothy Hmck Mrs. Doris Nord Mss. Mattis Hausa Ward I - Precinct 3. Mrs, Collette Bourdeaux Min; Mildred Raiser Mrs. Lillian Wegler Mrs. Lena Huh1eF Mrs. Michael Rik Mrs. Joyce Schmidt We. 'Red Erck Mrs,, Evelyn Selinski Mss. Iris Reiser Mrs, Madonna Johnson Ws. Gloria Swanson Mrs. B=ton Ellis Mss. Walter Nelson Mrs. Clarence Mitchell Mrs. Arlene Peterson Mrs. Eleanor Paulson Mrs. $AVY Browse STATEMNT OF CAWASS • Ward 2 - Precinct 2 Macs. Ward 2 - Precineft I Mrs. Lae Moudloh also Gerald Adams Mrs, Maxine Mondloh W. Morgan Lee Mrs. Shirley Pitala mss. Martys Wollum Mrs, Janice Habieseu was Marvel Peterson Mrs. Milada Saunders Mrs" Rita PierCe Mreo Don Muni Mrs. Adeline Haidle Mrsc Betty Ritter Mr. Harxy xavrocki Mrsp Dale Hadtrath Mrs" Fsaaci8 MCLaug3slin Mrs. D. J. Gabarielson Mrs. Carol. Towson Mrs.. Harold Jansen Wo. Jame Barnette • Ward 2 - Precinct 2 Macs. Beverly Kinsman Mrs. Jam Knutson Mss. Betty Johnsrud Mars. Joanne Rice Mrs. Lois Mullen Mrs. Ruch Gillespie Macs. Adeline Suanson Miss. Joyce Correll Mrs. Selma Hinytski Mrs. Eileen Freeman, Mrs. Margurite Jalkowski. Mrs. Sylvia Gillm4 Ms. Tom Cochran Mrs. Margaret Knudson Mrs" Sylvia Marrs Mr. John Parks Mrs. Janice DrIams, Mr. Douglas 'White Mrs. Judith Dresher Mrs. Lucille Westetawt Mrs. Lsnns Peterson M$s. Merle Thompson Mrs. Doris Gilquist Mrs. Ethel Grassini Ward 3 - Precincts I Mrs. Sylvia Korthof Mrs. Donna Matthes Mrs. S lacer Johnson Mrs. June solo -quis t Mrs. Everette Houle. Mrs. Betty Roberts" Mrs. Rosella Amar Mrs. Does Mae Odland Mr. David Chasten Mgrs. Leona Flemming Mss. Claire Marsuik Mrs. Barbara Gohman Macs. William Bradley Mrs. S. R. Harland Mss. Ernest Potjell Mrs. Marie q U&%es Mrs. Carol Larson 1� u Page 8. STA AZNI T O- CANVASS WwFd 3 - P>eawinctz 2 Hws. Lola ILawson Y$s o Joan Johnson Ifts. Ann Dware W-a. Ednird Hanscom Mrs. "=mine Wolsfeld Mrs. lAurence Anderson Mrs. F.Thetr a Nalson Mrso Elsie Baker Mrs. John Gerard Mrs. Ramald Whi tcob If�%a i,avwma Wildman RoSeT, Ha rst.d 33ra. Janice Ueuder wo . Vegaie Pet woon Mrsa use Szegds Mss. Bea&7 Skjermold Wo. Christine Peterson Mwa. Mildred Watkins Mrs. Valma, Pie Ward 3 - P�reciucT 3 Mrs, Jam Phelan Mrs. Hebb Tireusufals Mrs. Vela GoraFski Mss, Margaret Rurak Mrs, Xathleen Edstram Mrs. Doona Nwaak Mss. Joan Jackson COUWILHAN t• Mr,, Edward Figapatrick w- jAster Hungerfoard Mrs. Pearl Sandstrom MTs o Regina Markwood MIT. Paul Paterson Mrs. wirtle Hanson Mr,, Russell Magnusson MAYOR - William J, No*