The URL can be used to link to this page

12/06/1965 - 5943REGULAR COUNCIL X=TnIG AAA - IRCE ORR 6o 1965 BOLL CALL: 3, Special meeting, Havener 8, 1965, pages 1 - 18. Regular Meetings Noveaber 15v 1965e Pagers 19 - 48. Special Ming, November 17, 19650 Pages 49 & 50. special Meeting, NoveRnber 22o 1965, Pages 51 - 53. pUBL C BEASnTGs le on FranChis e - AMWICeeu Oil C:O,cpaeey (Cmtinued ft as 12/1/65) # Pages 54 - SG, gam, H�u_s ss: 20 Sign PeMit - Bvrg4C King (Tabled 11/8/65 and 11/15 /65)e 3, Proposed OrdinalWO - Hoasiag Cod e# 4. Proposed Ordinazwe - Sign Regvelatiou# 5, OrdirAnce No. 317 - Recoesideratica, 6. Passible Purchase of Park Prope"W (Tabled Page 570 Pagers 58 & 590 Pagers 60 - 71. Pages 72 -- 75. Pages 76 - 78. 8�W BUSI�SS: 7e 8148 - 3/4 Tan Truck (Opened Nome DecetOw 60 1965)10 pagers 79 - 810 8. Bide - MOM* Lake Twaiis C0UXU (Opened NOOne D�reamiaer 6e 1965) e 90 Planning Camdasica Meeting !minutes, Noveeeber 18e 1965# 10. Board of Appeals Meeting Miarutes# Deceeaabeoc 1# 1965# 11e Safety COMIttee Neetiug Nom# vaveed3�w 10, 1965* 12. Safety Caeamitta►e i00etiae$ minutes a Nove dw 17@ 1965# 13, Building Board Meeting Nbuters a Decenber 1, 1965e Page 82. Pages 83 - 94. page 95 & 960 Page 970 Pages 98 &990 Pages 100 & 101. L� 0 n U RZGUI.A►R COUNCIL MSSTMG AAA - I CZMU 6, 1965 (Continued) 14. Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes, November 10, 1965, Pages 102 & 103. 15. Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes, November 17, 1965, Pages 104 & 105. 16o Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes, November 23, 1965, Pages 106 - 111. 17. Carieations, (a) Minnesota Highway Depart r►t: Drainage on Mississippi street (b) ru a:ce Director: Sewed' Charges (c) Mounds view: Fish Houses (d) JngV4001 Hockery Rink Lighting (e) Minnesota Highway Department: Crossover at 61st. (f) Knigbto of Columbuse Bingo 18 o Sign Pernnit - 73rd & university Aver=* - Clsmzvn, TMO VZSTT'DTt3 19. t claim* 20. RStimates, 21. Licenses* 22. Petitions 032 thraigh #35 -1965, 23. Bids for Cleanup of Balance of Locks Park, 24o AppoitstmeaI a to Near Parke and Recreation Commission, 25. Amointmrnts, 26o Consideration of an Ordinance Amending Section 46001e D2 ,IgfS- 27. Reeolutiors Directing Issuance of Tesgio UT Bonrds, Streets 1965 -1, 28. Resolution Directing Salo and Purchase of TwW- a razy Bonded Streets 1965 -10 Pages 112 - 118. Page 119. Page 120. Pages 121 & 1229 Pages 123 - 125. Pages 126 - 131. Pages 132 - 134o pages 135 & 136. Pages 137 - 139 Page 140. Pages 141 - 1470 Pages 148 & 149. REGULAR COUNCIL MSSTIDiG AGZW A - MCBRSRR 6, 1965 (Continued) 29- Resolution Directing ISSVanc� of TWaparary Sonds, SW&5S#73, �. D L-- / pis' Pages 154 - 1560, 30. Resolution► Directing Sale and Purdmase of Temporary Bonds SW&SS#73, ,; D 6-- / y 6 ,�- Pages 157 & 158. 31. Resolution Abating Balance of Spacial Assessamts, Lots 10 and 11, Block As Riverview Heights Addition, "�2- 0 Cp - / y � S-� Page 159. 32. Resolution Ordering IiVrwement 2 60 treets 966-1, Pages 160 - 165. 33. Resolution Authorizing Splitting Assessments - Lot 1, Parcel 30, Auditor ° s Subdivision #129, Z 7, Page 166, 34o Resolution Approving Plans and Special Provisions, Interchate Lighting, ` �.� - l �S� Pages 167 & 1680 i REGULAR CECIL MIRTING AGENDA CONEWS - WCBMR 6, 1.965 1. ON PRANCNISE - AIBRICAN OIL COMPANY (COMIJ0ME FROM 11/1/65): The ootdluanae for seeWd reading is an Pages 54 through $6. At the last discussion relative to this ordinance, Am riaan Oil . C0RVWW *a representative was I nstruated to cfceck with their legal -%---- i:motnt and case up with some reeoaaendations* I have heard nothIM from the Asanrlcan Oil Company since. 2, SIGN PRRM - Swan yz= (Ths= 11/x/65 AND 11/15 /65): Previous reformer to this item is on Page 36 of this agenda. The appli- MUM is an Page. 57o 1 called the sign eosgmW rePa tative and advised US that this would be on the agenda for Deaftobeor 6th, I have hoard nothing from him since. 3, PROPOSND ORVIN UM - SOUSING Coms The or+dina as is an Pages 5x and 59. Last discussion of the housing cods indireatted that the CM=11 wished to consider the possibility of reading this ord- iaanCe for the first time on Deasuber 6th, with the Planning cam- mission to study the proposal at its m6ting of December 16th, to report to the Cotnncil on Deas ober 20th 4o PROPOSaD ORDI04M - SIGN RSGULATi05h A proposal is found on Pages 60 through 690' On Pages 70 and'71 is a letter fran the Chamber of Costmerce m!%king eaa:tain recaronn for Changes In the ordinance, which changes the City Attorney advises me have been made and are shown in the ocdinance, on Pages 60 through 69, by underlining, I believe that a few other suggested d aages are also included in this draft, but the City Attorney can advise you as to which ones these are. 5. ORDXWAKS NO. 317 - RECONSIEATICOl T'be reconsideratim of this ordinanga was tabled to this meeting, The Gedinance is on Pages 72 and 73 as passed at the Nove due 15th meeting, a000ept that I have deletes the name of the contracting company from Section 6 on Page 72. I also have included the authorization by the Federal Govern0mt, foal eXpercditure of funds for sewer eleming, an Pages 74 and 75. 1 an supposed to receive bids from Soil 301141fiers and Amariaan Pape today or toworrow, and I Will have Mr. Coenstook and MC* Qurefibi analyze these bids to report to you on Monday. I have advised both Soil Solidifieors and AmWLCan Pipe to be present in sy office at 2 g,J6 -ML_NORda - Doo,K 6. 1965, so that the QgM J can go over the project, and the problems, with both ' bidders for an hour prior to the scheduled meeting at 8 P,X. REGULAR Co= =L D8 WWG AGENDA C0888NTs - DEC== 6, 1965 (Continued) 6. POSSIBLN PURCUM OF PARK PR Wjss (TABLSD 11/15/65) t A drawing of Lots 3 and 4 as previously discuse0d with the CouaCIL will be found an Page 76, The Parks and Playgrounds s ttee sting minutes of November 16th are on Pages 77 mad 78, because* at the bottom of Page 77, the a the purchaser of these two lots at a cost of $2,244.64 which includes special assessments. 7. BIDS - 3/4 T 1t TRUCK (OPEM 80011. DSODOR 6. 1965) t Bid tabu- lation sheets are ova. Pages 79 through 81. 1 will have a reeam- xmi ndation font you at the suing. S. SIDS - MOM LAM TS'ms Co1RT8 (opz= 8Cc10 DBCXXM 6. 196-4) s A tabulation shoot is on Page 82. I will have a reoomdation for you at the meeting. 9. PLUMING C0MMISSIC11 WWRTING ![tUMS - MOVMWR 18, 19651 The • minutea are an Pages 83 through 87. Item #1 on Pages 83 and 84. the Planning Commission reeossunds the lot split. I will' have drawings and further information an this available for your at the meeting. item #2 on Page 84, the commission van - -toe- -- the lot split. Certificates of Survey of the lots after splitting are on Pages 88 and 89. Item #3o Page 844 the commission recce~ mends the lot split. Drawing of the lot split is on Page 90. , Item #40 Page 840 the ea nission reoon 1 ds the vacation of the easement as in the area indicated an Page 919 Item #So Pages 84 and 85, the ecamission rercoms I the lot split illustrated on Page 92e TMe City Attornay advised me that there would appear to be no legal objection to the split. Stem #60 Page 850. the cams+eission In the lot split0 one lot 90 foot wide mad the other lot 160Ag foot wide. This is illustrated an Pages 93 and 94. Tho commission took no wtion an Items #7, #8, #9, #100 and #11 on Pages 85 through 87. in Item #12, Page 87, the eose- smission Is to the City Council that the Council refer the possibility of building senior citizens° housing to the Housing and Re4avelopment Authority. The other red underlined item in item #12 on Page 87 was underlined by the toc rdiLng secretary, not by me, beck M. Danielson wished the Council to take notice, as he stated , at the meeting. in Item #13o an • Page 87, the Plashing Commission asked that the Plannning Consult- ant ice a steady, which I would assume the Council would wish either to authorizer or to reject. This concludes the Planning Commission minutes. J • • 0 RSGULhR COUMM MET=G AGC=h tSOMMS • DBCZMBR 6, 1965 (Continued) 10. BOARD OF APPEALS.MIRTIM HUMUS, 1XCZMM 1, 1965: ',he" minutes are on Pages 95 and 96e in oaCh one of the items the Board ree- deed granting the vasriance. The fourth itmea however, an Page 96, will have to go to the Planning Comoission on Deceuber 16th, so that there will be no action for the Council until Docedbr 20th. Action then would be eithear to order a public hearing, or reJect the dation of the Board of Appeals. 110 SAFM COM11'10011 MERTING KUV=Sb 100 19651 I will have the plans for the National Tea Store and Burger KIM Res- taurant at the meetings if the Council wishes to act tapes the Safety Carsittea's action on Page 97. 120 SAFM COiO1;LT1'!Oi JMT=G MMMMS , WY=MR 17, 1965 s These minutes are an Pages 98 and 99. on Page 98, the Safety Camittes rec -MmWo that the status quo be maintained at the intersection of 61st and 7th Streets Northeast. The periodic traffic count, at the once intersection, roeomaea A d by the Safety Caeoittee will be done by the Public: works Department, The stop sign Installations an reed can Pages 98 and 99 are being carried out now by the Public Works tX101to 13. sunDum Bo&RD mmTIBG mss, 1, 1965: The minutes are on Pages 7100 and 101. In Items #10 #3, and #4, the Board reaco�esade� approval of the building permit, and in Itm #28 theiy Yecarmaainded forwarding it to the Safety Camsittes which will mgt on December 15th, so that you can consider their rert~- omaendation an Deck 20th. The structure in item #5 was built behind they Plywood Rinn®sota building, so that it could not be seen from the road, so that is how the building was built without a building permit, 14. , 15 . , & 16. FRIDLSY BORIS IRG AM RRDSVRLOPMT ABC BORM IBETII�G HIUMS, MM 10, 1965s BROMMER 17, 1965 AND N0ViNSBB 23, 1965a Thom alnuteas age an Pages 102 through 111. If there is any item that you wish to discuss in any of these minutes, it can be brought up at this time Otherwise, they can be received and filed* 17. CO MMMICATIMS a raj ltirsaesota Si�tswaty Depart " 11st1 Drainage an Mississippi Streets The letter an Page 112 is self•escplanatoxy. You probably area aware: that I was concerned that the County might not plan proper drainage for the I crve %v OF Mississippi Street, and this seems to confirm that theey will. RNGULRR COR7MM MUTIM AAA CO TS - DBCSMM 6o 1965 (Continued) (b) ftnano=o Director: Sewer Charges: The mamts von Page 113 is self- e_laaat=ye Otdil=ily, without a dieaatear, the total nub of loss in the trailer c owct are charged a seR+r w charge whether or not occupied, (e) Hounds Views Fish Sousess The letter on Page 114 is waif- explanataxy, and the ordinance refetred to is an Page 11015. This is all that I know about this Mtt4w* (d) Jaycees: Hockey Rink Lsghtiags The letteoe ao Page 116 .is self-explanatory. The Chairman of the Packs Sub - aasalttsa and the Chaft=n of the Recreation Cnooasmission feel that this is a wortU&Lle expenditure by the City to o alete the hockey rIx* installation. The Parks and Recreation Director advises sow that the budget of the Parks and Recreation Dot can handle this $472.00. (e) 11l:vtaesota Highway Dapastm a P- k t Crossover at 61st: It wears to ms that the letter an Page 117 rowAly comp. • forms to the wishes of � City Council* tf trine is any other Information yon want me to obtain from the State, or information that you want me to forward to the State, you can advise me at this time (g) ICni*hts of Columbus: Siugo: The letter over page 118 is self-solanatory. The City Attaraey can advi" you how to handle this matter, which I believe, is done without a formal permit a - but with a letter to the applicant advising him. of the car® he must Overaise In handling bingo, 18* 8200 PBRHZT - 73RD AND UMMVBRSM AVZM iKORTH6AST - CLilitO # XXC: The application oon Page 119 is self-explanatory. 19. CLRM s The Claim airs are an pane 120. Detail of the Claims; In included In the envelope with the agenda. 20a BSTIMAT88s A list of two estimates will be found an Page 121. Detail of the first esti hate, which is a final, is an Page 122. 21, LI " 885: The licenses are;' con Pages 123 throwh 12510 22. PBTITION #32 M04M O5 -1965 s The petitions oa Page 126 thsouO 128, number" 4320 #33, and #p35 - 1965 are a result of the public hearing an the Streets 1966 -1 Improvement. on Page 129 is a colour imp of the area showing those in favour of the ovaomslsnto those opposed to it, those who signed petitions both favoring and opposing the iacprovement& and those who did nat sign =V petition. I felt that this Weeld be easier to interpret than just to give you a eopy ' of the petition and a per ventage of signers. I Undw- stand that then• may be quitO a feW people fras RivervieW Heights heave to determine what you do relative to this UPC Vemsut, so that pft%Ws you will wish to ,love this item, and Item #32o up on the agenda, probably following the public heariaq an the Franchises petition #34 -1965 is an Page 130. There, is a msp an Page 131 showing the location of the signers of the petition* 23. BIDS FOES Cf3;A MP OF BALANCE OF LOQQ1 PARK: These bids are can Pages 132 through 134, We have tried to estimate the relation -. ship of the hourly rates for personnel and equipment found on Page 134 with the possible use of said manpower and equ>�parat, and have shown on Pages 132 and 133, ghat this probably would total, I believe the memo on Pages 132 and 133 is self - explanatory, I will be happy, however& to gO into it furthest with you at the meeting. The recordation of Dr. uwrdg the expect in these matters, is that the most amt people in this field awe MinDs80ta Trot and Northland TreG service, although Parkway TYee service is approximately $10500. less than those bidderss if you wish to follow his reeomendation, it would appear that Minssesota Tres would be the lowest ,best; bidder, because their price includes a boom truck with driver at $5.75 an hour& and Ha thland Tres does not. The boom truck with driver at $5.75 per hour would increase Morthland • s estimted maxi== to mare than that of Kinaesota Tree, 24. APPOINTM MS TO HSW PARKS An RiScn"ICU COnassIogs A portion of the ordinance setting up the Commission is an Page 136, and the other 1na►foree►tIcu relative to those appointments is an Page 135. Both the Parr Sub- caa®aittee &ad the Recreation commission feel that they are no longer active groups, and therefore, will un- doubtedly not most again, 25. APPOINTMI WS a T'hOto are two .appointments on Page 137 for your aappYOVal as TeC=Mnd0d by the City 8.n91neer and UVself, ReCentlyo X a now from the Chief of Police sycaalaendiaq replacing the three Part-time dispatchers with two full -time patrolmen as dispatchers. AJl.thcalcjh the Council at that time approved this change in administrative policy, there seems to be some hesitancy . about its so can Pages 138 all 139A 1 have asked the Chief to take a 28-day period and ahcr the anount, of manpower on duty. The 9COM rat setup is shown. an Pagel 139, and the proposed setup is shorn on Page 138, Both patrolmen area civilian dispatchers receive PoE,RoA, and Hospitalization benefits paid by the Cityv so that it is possible to acmpare base aal.aries for these positions to show 0 Ll RROULAR C+OtSiiCIL 1 UMIG AAA COilMrS - =ZXBBR 6, 1965 (CoUtiaued) 33. RBSOLVU= AVMM= a SPLM SMBCtAL AMSS1iM - LOT 1, PAML 30, AUD=M "S SUBDIVISIOK , #129 t The resolution On Page 166 is ' titre Umal routine assatiZutiioaa that you haw passed in the Post. 34o RBSOLUTI(W APPRO VM PLUS AM SIRCM PROVISIONS - = 11 - M LIGB =at The resolution an Pages 167 anti 168 is sel lasatary• if the Ca4ueail widbes to view the plans fw the proposed lighting face the you can do so bet=* the Council meeting in the Bngineat's.offIce, and of course, it will be availabis got yowe consideocati.oas at the QOUDWI msating. I will not s'eiasi ve the sealed proposals f om soil Solidifiets and AeteriAan Pipe Services unti l 2 P.X, on Fxiday, Deoabet 3. 1965. I tM of that tbere will be time for the City BnglneW and the Coansultu g Bnginas a to s'wu w the bids ,Friar to the meeting as Denodmt 6tho The Couswil requested a mastiog to considlir than bids with Soil Solidifiers and Ate wi=m Pipe at 7 P.M. is my office on Dew 6th. They will be here to meet with yano 0 w, THE MUMS OI? THE SPEC7L41 COUNCTL M MTING OF MMMMR S, 1965 A Special Council Meting of the Council of the City of Fridley was Called to order by Mayor Nee at gt01 P.M. ROLL Members Preseatt Nee, Kirkham, Wright, Thompson, Sheridan Members Absent: Bane AMOVAL OF MINU71:S,, RZOM COUNCIL MBTrNG NONBM= 1. 19651 Motion by Kirkham to adopt the minutes of the Regular Council Meting of November 1, 19€:5 so submitted. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. rdbsZ��►. �W1= The City Manager stated that he has not received a reply from the Chamber of Oommrca, or any indication from the Chamber -of Commerce, concerning their attitude towards the proposed ordinance. Councilman Sheridan stated that, since the Chamber of Counarce has not replied as requested, he believes the ordinance should be tabled until the Council has sufficient information concerning the attitude of local groups towards the proposed ordinance. Counciliman Wright stated that he b4tliedee the Chamber of Commerce should be informed that the Council has considered the ordinance but will not take action until the City roceivas mgrs inforuation from private groups in `tbe City of Fridley. Motion by Sheridan to table indefinitely consideration of the proposed amead- ment to Chapter 56, regulation of sigue, until the Council receives additional information concerning the proposed ordinance. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the ss$tion carried unanimously. SIGN PERMIT - BURGER KING (TABLE-D l0L1Bf 65.x. The City Manager stated that he has received no additional information from the Burger King Company concerning their application for a sign permit. ft, stated that the Council previously asked Burger King to submit a design for a smaller sign. Mayor Hoe asked whether anTone was present at the Coemcil MeetiuS representing the Burger King Cerny- There was no reply. Mayor Nee asked whether the prevent ordinance provides that the Council issue a sign pardit for the constru.cticm of signs. The City Manager answered that this is correct. Mctior, by Wright to tabl* monsideretioe~ of the sign permit application by '. Burger K.irg Company peudlirg receipt of farther information from the applicant. Seconded bq Sheridan. U a Voice vote.. there "eing ro nags, the esatian carried unwimously. 0 - r Im LVI Y r . PAGZ 2 n as CI t y MAi-1 s r vt&;,aad chat Col 3a Hol.g htm h40 r-It yet completed hosxings ftn& wing - ,:oa,gLructtr,a of SSO1 ?. Rye StAted Zb4t Col=bi6.. Heights will hold x � irec the foilc�;sfF�;, c'"tLing- a01GOr._6t i t5ha.iden asked whether ,lu s i.a S iShi.vs +ill a;.t the sus night tha! hTSrin -ae are cl000d. The City Atcorney c- agwreret` that he dsd m3t know 0ittho or no!t Cc;)., is Heeights would do so. TbP- City A.ttca:r y informd tho - ouncil that t4�ay Mi=060t& Aighwraay Departsasnt has rejected bids for the project, aeinca Columbta Heights hss aunt advanced financing for the pro;lect tFa than Hinnezotaa Highway Department. The City Attorxaey stated that he prefers to delay conariderawti,an of the agreements until Col b'& Heights act* an th&a. T.-ac City Attorney aasksid whether the contractors who presented the twa lowest bids to the City of Fx,idley indicated whether they would grant an extension of time to the City- Duane Olson was present at the Council Meeting reprre- ssAntin.g the OOinsulting Engineering firm of Cowtock and Davis and sta4:ed that Lmetti & Sons,mho have the lots bid on this job, also have a low bid on a construction project in Coon Rapids and are considering, bidding on other jobs. He agitated that .Mr. Lemetti inform*4 hiss that has would call the city Manager's office the falloving Wednesday to find out if the City of Fridley will award a bid on this work or whether he should seek additional wrorlt. Councilman Sheridan st,aregd than the Administration should ask the contractor for a five day eatenaeion of tike to allow the Council to consider the natter at the regular Council Meeting of November 13, '965, and inform the coatrecter that the City of Fridley is willing to atimssrd t & IM contract to hiss. The City Attorney statpid that the City Attorney of Coluwbia Heights is Advising the Uty of Columbia Heights not to sign the contract before that Public hearings on same are Completed. He started that be is rather reldlstsat to advise Columbia Heights to sign, any agresa&atv for this project. He stated tl^ at he thinks Colasmbiae Heights might be ready to acct by Wednesday. Mayor Nee called a special Council Meeting of the Council of the City of Fridley for Wednesday, November 13th at SOO FIX., with the provision that should Columbia Height* approve the agreemerts, or sl°ould the meeting be unnecessary, the City Mower will i,nforu the Council chat the special meting has been called oft. 11w Council took no action upon this matter. _FRIDIZY - CoT.I3I AIA HEMUP4 - The Co=cil took ro action ugdn ti°is matter. 10/1816 ii Tale co'Ires: t:.ok nic iC'Z1fik qar' ccii e1C.3e'a. :lL V iVE KINNNE200TAA IRIGHW is►� � one C.1,ty manager 5etat*4 that +tho i?esolutiOn authorising this agru+ement concerswd the joint con.struction pro,jact with Columbia Heights. Ae stated that Pending ce@tletioa of the a &reeeeenta, the Cam -cil mhould not adopt ,the r+esoluti0c. The Council took no actizz upon this matter. M -1 TO R- 3A Councilman bright asked whether it is correct that consideration of this ordinance depends upon the rspidity with which connections are eemde to the sanitary stele or system of the. N.S.S.S.D. The Mayor stated that is not correct, that this part of the aan.itary setter eyste n will be coaaneected to a different suer systest, rather thmm to the N.S.S.S.D. Motion by Wright to adopt, upon second readies, ordinance #315 reaming 4-2S and M -1 to R -3A, it portion of Sylvan mills Mat 8, and publish same. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a roll call vote, there being no nays, the eestieo carried unanizouslyd Motion by ThoWson to adopt, upon second reading, Ordinance #316 rssoaeiag from R -1 to CR -1 the north 400.00 feet of the vest 217.80 feet of Oatlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition and publish sam, Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a roll tall vote, there being no nays, the uAioa carried unanimously. SAFST'Y CCMT EE MEETING MNUTES - OCTOBER 20_,,_1%5-. Councilman Wright asked the City !tanager whether he has data concerning the traffic count at the intersection of 7th Street Northeast with 61st Aveane North4"t, esspecimlly a traffic count of the number of vehicles making turns at this intersection. The City Manager stated that he has traffic count data, taken from automatic counters, and that it is not feasible to use the auto- matic counters to detarstinJe the number of vshtcles making a turn at an intersection. its stated that the only way this data can be gathered is to have an observer at the intersection count the cnmeber of tears that stake turns. The City der provided copies of the traffic count to the Council. Council- man, Wright. stated that he belieava& the School Board 4nd Y.T.A. ars correct and a four -vay stop should be provided at the intersection. Councilman K.irkhm stated that' he is also in agreeecmeat vi.th this argument. Motion by Wright to resc4ivee and file the minutes of this Saf'etY genes Ittee ;t*ting of October 20, 1965. Seconded by Shearidan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays;, than uotion carried unanim usly. BC1M OF APPEAIS MEETING 14INUT'E Z1'3E:k .27, 2965: The Zity 'Ur_agr� szz%:Od tl.,ae: zhe Plwwir.g Zoamiss en 2s considering the regtwst of A-,.Ke h -doer a-4d 14t, eees for zacstrtctlor cf a nursir.g kome Can ;r �� . t� ii. _,4, sa. tc tatit that :ha d of s °" s g eed k�'at t3 ac :r :a*£ tits r.. e � :gv (tnt , and t a .3 Y3 3 1� �% f) s Pi i „ "s i # ➢M A� au Y bg be hold 4. c�ex.k d . the h4trinr' hold y th" tlaam n.� 3 i =tee of the board of A M'M ., c s :qtr ►he'X `g ,. 6 , to t.e tb rtq~ lest of mi�x4a sfne�r and c�th�ra. w.,s 4 d ? .a r 4th Add.V -10i, an scei 6, ara ce ote,ethdaxe � raring u� tbig req rxest- a caz? :d y KiT-kho , U -. r-.rf g., the viii a sl$rlt�LC�� IkR�C� l�i�Fi4 i -r g a {J{ TOY'iy 27 3 1965. K :��ge a :eyed chat the F ie; J....e6 secured tho Agr.�+a�an of „._.,e i taOugo upon s�001 g�ropert9• z � hsaal. xd t:a loc*te vhj proposed �s�a n nistsat9 advise •u3cil.n ice so°, stats that heVishe(! to a} the Adis building to the 3a; c4es that i h 'rill be nece�€s&I-7 for t :�� s� loy, The City MA sv s ta ,dw re s of t:he jai . In& Code of tb* "" of Pr ad�ty. bring it nF to s at�sd t ""s -At: the Jayr -elzz �.Lqed t�s r ��lh�sstod that discussed tb* a� spris►Z stancaxds: C.o+.neil Wight t attb :tea ttf�C.s4xd and the park tAStixa agreed nczt to object to �s a t ucra�': su f awh r4sorvolr' if they€ 11 tc locate � to hat the e ,� tar the site of the €utuxo rsxasw�r�V�'�aus��onisVi(U so i.t Vould be possible i i t" o ret ag,ret* t, set the c a . �°sa-A ►g hOUP ash ")ot s t t , + : inm resary .oaf the see►s� avoid inter'fe:,.,ng jai h, Xirkh to cur ��sesi� �sv�th the u�3atla$ � d giant a VoVin'l Po t try the y i l:.y r ,,eves LstructuKID 4ram colt ilia ,gets tI i�riA voice C Tie park 00 a -Ira�:t,ng house. Seconded by Y�J�`iSbt.. �� va9�� vsst�e, atyq:, the ti.•.sn ca►rri,td , rr,i us►iy, Dr. T» H. LStt_ Vas Present at the Council ting a►t cmmd plot please .e calevatia � of the prpPost" ela_nic. to the t;a aazcithe ,owne ®si�acroas tb4 L since the first. )Isms. vex* �prs►ser,t to tGo�z^uciyis n �ixight asked the City s~idth of the bou'.!.e'�a►x$ s�otro ` °; �saet, 10t will be sar.isfactoryv '� 1 gineex ehet� er ..dxeiamge €xocs t- air :t t gi e .r st.gted t? st the p t�s cio �t ehczv tfist ga,sda�s '°anhss1+elaYa�laa*s r= Loutex cast&& that rise arcii.tactY ibs rated Agsocisetes, for Unity ys4 i,.t.ak . s+1evs ti+a t teat ✓link imt�eh mass► of Unity Hospital to ^�ovide drainage frame tha park ng log; r.0 the street. l +time by � "I ht to cmcu�t �itb the �e�tloaa o€ the ilasoning C> ommissioa #Dd v rov th�� siEA pl s of th�a r,. c1 medical cli -uic." pd►cond+sd by girlsb�. U.Po the wti *ra carried :L'wusly. ;pp�� a voS.c:a fir, .e, CF sYe lei�.�� .�.� a..a5s: TM C"Cxa. M t 7� S or 11/6165 PAGI 5 RED VISION I TING NMW..MS, SEPTMWR 30,E tion by Rirkh vv tc receive and files the aainutes of the Recreation Comissiciw Notestius of Seepteasber 30, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nz &yn, that motion carried unanimously. FR LEY HOUSING AND REDEVEI.OMNT AUTWRITY METING MINUTES - OCTOBER 13, 19631 Councilman Wright: announced that W. Hodne wished to invite the Council to act as a jury and consider the student pro fects *ich are designs for the Fridley City Center . Urban Renewal Project on November 15th. Notion by Sheridan to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Rousing and Redevelopment: Authority Meeting of October 13, 1965. Seconded by Wright. Ripon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. FRiDIZY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES - OCTOBER 2®1, 1963: Notion by Kirkham to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment: Authority Mating of October 20, 1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote,. there being no nay4, the motion carried unanimously. FRIDIBY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY METING MINUTES OCTOBER 274 1965: Motion by Kirkham to receivata and file the minutes of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of October 27, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice votes, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 2094IAlrCA S N . S . SAS . D AFYOIN!DMNT OF REPRESENTATIVE t The Mayor stated that whoever Is the appointed representative of the X.S.BA.D. in the City of Fridley will counit the City-to an expenditure of funds vhanever authorising a permit for connection to then N.S.S.S.D. The Mayor asked vhather the persons proposod by the City Manager for these positions are bonded. The City Manager answered that these persona cau be bonded. He stated that Administratively the permit6 would be checkod Through his office before being issued. He stoteaed that both of the perem*, *whom be recoteamendai for thdse positifts;'. efts procatsi.ng sewer perm tie at than present titre. The Mayor stated that the persons certifying ammr connections to tie N. S. S. 8, D. have responsibility for theatres connections. He stated teat thecae persons will have a great decal of responsibility, a n-d he is concerned whether these persons should actually reign these certificates. Mayor Pure asked wbetber the persons who check these applications for ewer connection permits kill be abler to ascsrtaain that property owners hev+e paid or been assessed fees for construction of the sanitary sewer services to their property. The Finance Director answered that there is a place upon the present: *ever permit application where the Finance Department verifies whether the** people have been assessed for the proper share of the system to which they prapoae6 t;r connect. Mayor Nee stated that in siping the aapplicafJozn $stir connection to the N.S.S.S.73. services, the s person ioing; to cortifie s that tho City of Fridle;- has toes money to nuke this cc ne ction, and he beli.errees .ttis person should ot# in the Finance DeWtsent or have charge of all City furactiante. TAE COUNCIL I'1INVI'"ES OF 11/3/65 PACE 6 • Counciltsam Shert and asked wheth*r it is possible .that connections could be Oahe to the N. S.W&V lira without takAng an application for a sewer permit from the City. The Cijy Manager stated that this might be possible, but that it is also possible for parsons to wake connection to the City seiner at the present time ulthout a permit. He stated that he does not believe a largo' vurabew of people area doing so. The City Manager stated that if it is found upon reviewing an application that there is no eumay for making the connection, the City can void the permit. The City. Attorney suggested that the Financs Director be appointed the certifying official, since it would be necessary to certify that there is money available for making theses connections. Tie Mayor asked the City Kanager if he would be willing to act ax tht certifying officer to the N.S.S.$.D. The City Manager stated that he could do no. Tho City Manager pointed out, how - ever, that both the Plumbing Inspector and the Superintendent of Public Viorke are responsible to him through the City Engineer. The Finance Director stated that the Finance Department presently varlfies assessments to these officials for issuance of sewer permits at the present tide. He shored the Council the application formes which tie City is p esertly using. The Mayor stated that each application will be worth $250, and he feels that persons with greater authority than the pearoone proposed by the Manager should be certifying these applications. YAyor Nees steted that the details cn the work sheet provided by the N. S. S. S. D. aW that the N. S. S. S. D. is afraid that persons will. make connections to the eystsm without authorization to do to, and the City is should do whatever is feaji,ble to insure that all corrections are properly We. Motion by Weight that the City of Fridley certify to the N.S.S.S.D. as certifying officers authorized to process applications and issue permits for c.aaection to the ;sanitary sewer system of the N.S.S.S.D., the City M eager, Earl Wagner, and as his deputy the Finance Director, Marvin Erunsell. Seconded by Thompson, Upon a voice vote, thesrn being. no nays, the motion carried unani- mously. CITY ENGINEER: A,CCERTXNCE OF STNS tretsONS'S CRAIGWAY 2ND ADDIliff t Motion by Kirkham to concur with the recommendations of the City Engineer and accept the streets in Pearsonti Craiaway 2nd Addition plat subject to a one year maintenance bound. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. KING! ASSESSMENTS; Mr, King was present at the Council Meeting and stated that he has owned these four lots since 1950. He stated that the four lots have dimensions of 25 feet by 105 feet each. He stated that a house is built upon Lots 12 and 13, lot #11 is ustd as a driveway to provide access to this property, and Lot #10 will be the site of a future garage. Fa stated that he moved off the property in 1958 and rented the same. In 1960 he connected the house to the City sewer services and raa a water line into the loose but did not have a • me-ter installed or make Wide connections to tke cater system. 0 1961 he sold the douse on a contract for deed. kcwe:aer. tte a *claser failed to aeake parmrrts upon the mortgage, and the mcrtgagae cr_eercd Mr. Kind, to t:etke back THE COUNCIL MINMS OP 1118/65 PAGE 7 the house from the purchaser and make the back payments. He stated that upon searching through the unpaid assessments, he was informed by the City of Fridley that these amounted to $2100, but when be checked the assessments with the Anoka County Assessor, he found the assessments amounted to only $1500. He stated that he than checked these assessments again with the City Assessor of the City of Fridley and was informed that the amount of the assessments is $1300. He stated that there is an assessment of $685 on Lots 12 and 13 for water and sewer connection to these two lots, and he is willing to pay this asseasment since this connection has been made to his house. He stated that there is an equal assessment against Lots 10 and 11, but as he mentioned before,'Lot It is used as a driveway to provide access to the house and Lot 10 is the location of a future garage. 1b stated that these two lots will not be used as a building site and he sees no reason why.he should be assessed for the sewer and water services vhich apparently have been rues into this property. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Ring who received the tax statments for this property. Mt. Ring stated that the tax statements were given to Twin City Federal Savings and Loan, mortgagee to the property. Mayor Nee asked Mr. King who was making the tax payments. Mr. King answered that he in paying the taxes to the bank. He stated that he noticed that there was an increase of $4 per 000th in the amount of the payment at the time this connection could have been made, but he stated that he did not believe that this was a charge for the connection, but rather an additional charge for an increase in taxes. Councilman Sheridan stated that the assessments for this construction were made oea, the former basis where 759. of the coact was assessed against the building site and 259. of the cost was assessed on a per front foot basis. Councilman Sheridan asked what is the front foot charge for this construction. The City Finance Director answered that the amount its is Excess of $12 per front foot. Councilman Sheridan stated that for the one hundred foot building site then the cost would be in excess of $1200. The Pike,Director answered, "Yen." The 1?1nauce Director stated that the charge would amount to $342.28 for each 25 foot lot. Cwmzilmen Kirkham asked what amount of this charge against two lots the property owner asses to the City. Mr. King stated that he believes that one -half the taxes have not been paid. Mayor Nee asked the Finance Director what is the condition of the project accounts. The Fitumce Director answered that this construction project has bees: combined with other projects in one bond issue,, and that an abatement of the single assessment would not be a great amount as fair as the total funding of these combined projects is concerned. The Finance Director stated, however, that if the precedent were set that some of the assessments are abated, a sufficiently large number of such abatements could result in a deficiency in the funds. The Finmee Director stated that there are many such 50 front foot building sitapi assessed. He stated that in some eases the extra charges were paid and the sitev were not used for buildings, The Council examined an aerial map showing the location of Mr. icings property. Cocnellnen Wright asked Mr. King if the City were to abate a portion of the assessments, would Mr. King be twilling to split the amount with the City. • W. King stated that he vould not ask for a refund os taxes which he teas already paid, but that he would like to have an abatement of the ranaioder of the assemant against Lots 10 and 11. Council== Sheridan stated that he THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF 1118/65 PAGE 8 • would like to postpone, until the following Council Meeting, consideration of the abatement in order to give the Council time to examine the building sites. Notion by Sheridan to table to the regular Council Meeting of November 15, 1965, consideration of abatement of sewer and water assessaaents against Lots 10 and 11, Block A, Riverview Reights Addition to allow the Council time to review the site. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. S _REFUND OF CASH BOND Motion by Kirkham to comer with the recommendation of the Building Impactor and release the $500 perforapace bond provided by Mr. Mistelske. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. JAT=S iLOCRE PARK CIEANUPs Us City Manager stated that this additional bill is apparently part of the cleanup work included in the bid received by the Fridley Jaycees. Be stated he did not know why this bill was presented to the City. Mr. Tbnco was present at the Council Nesting and stated that he is a member of the Fridley Jaycees, but that he is not an the committee responsible for Locks Park cleanup. He stated that the Fridley Jaycees hired four items of mechanised equipment which were brought into Locke Park to perform soave work wbich the City wished to have completed. He stated that he believes this charge may ba the rental on these four items of equipment. Notion by Thompson to defer consideration of the estimate of the Fridley Jaycees for Locke Park cleanup, and ask the Fridley Jaycees for a supporting statement explaining their request for these additional funds. Seconded by WSright..'Upogn a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. C PM: RESOLMIONS Motion by Thompson to receive the resolution from the Village of Circle Pines. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon.s. voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. P'TA_ 4-WAY STOP. 7TH STMT AND 61ST AVNN©E NQt1MAST; lotion by Sheridan to receive the coamunication from the PTA and forward sae to the Safety Committee along with data of the traffic count at the inter - section of 7th Street Northeast with 61st Avenue Northeast. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. CITY ATTMNSYS SEWER LAMMAL ASSSSSMS Councilman Kirkham stated that in view of the fact that the assessment for connection to the sewer lateral should have been nude aim years ago, that • the property has changed bands several times, the last change being seven years a'W, and aims the property eras not assessed at that time, he favors abating these assessments. TOE COUNCIL MUIMS OF 11/8165 PAGE 9 • Notion by Kirkham to abate the assessment for sewer connection to Lot 19 Block 4, Ostmanee 3rd Addition. Councilman Sheridan stated that he would second this notion for the purpose of discussion. Councilman Sheridan asked Councilman Kirkham whether he is proposing that the entire assessment be abated. Councilman Kirkham answered, "Yes." Councilman Sheridan stated he does not favor abating the entire assessment. Councilman Sheridan asked the Finance Director haw the assessment was computed. The Finance Director stated that the ama+-it of the assessment was computed using the current figures for the average cost of a sewer lateral connection. Counci.lmaa Sheridan asked what is the cost of the sewer lateral assessment to the property at the time it should bane been assessed. The Finands Director stated that the lot adjoining this one, vhich was cou+sected to sewer services at the sane time and which lot is the same site as this me, was assessed a cost of $346.69. Councilman Sheridan stated that he does not believe that any property caner has a right to free service of the sever lateral and that a property owner should pay the cost of the assessment as it should have been made in 1956 and not the cost of an assessment for connection in 1965. Councilmen Kirkham stated that this property has changed hands twice, and that the present owner has really been caught in the middle as the owner of the property when the asses, 1 t was found and is getting stuck for the amount, whereas, a previous property owner should have paid this amount. Councilman Sheridan stated that if the City would accept such a policy, it would allow any property owner who sold his property before an assessment was spread to get out of paying such an assessment. Councilmen Sheridan asked Nr. Schmedeke whether he would accept an assessment based on the 1956 cost of sewer lateral connection instead of the present cost. Mr. Schmedeke stated that he had asked the City Finance Department twice previously, at the time that he bought the property and at the time he sold the property, what the amount of outstanding assessments were against the property. He stated that he was not informed of any assessment for sever connection charges. Mr. Schmedeke stated that when the attorney for the. purchaser asked for an assessment search, he was informed there would be a future assessment against the property for the amount of sewer connection charges. Mayor Nee. asked Mr. Schmedeke whether he paid the quarterly charges for sewer services., Mr. Schmedeke answered, "Yes." Mayor Nee stated that it would seem that the proposal of Councilman Sheridan to assess the property for the cost of the sewer lateral connection in 1956 is a reasonable one. The Finance Director stated that the City records show that there was so special assessment search made against the property until October 13, 1965. He stated that when a request is not made for a written search of special assessments, pending assessments are not necessarily given to the property owner. He stated that the form of a written aaw-4sment search, includes a space for listing any future assess ment$ pending against the property. Council- man Wright stated that since the records shod that no written sesr6 was THE COUNCIL HtNIM OF 11/8/65 PAGE 10 • requested by Mr. Schmedeke, there would be no opportunity for the City to point out to Mr. Schmedeke that this assessmnt had not been made. He stated that there was no record of any request by Mr. Schmedeke for a- written search, and Mr. Schnadeke °s verbal request for a Listing of assesswnts against the property was made in a casual manner, whereas, the proper request for a written search would have provided Mr. Schmedeke with the information that this lateral connection charge was not made. Councilman Sheridan stated that the property benefits from the connection whether the assessment was made or not. Mr. Schmedeke stated that he called and asked for the assessments against the property just before the other property owner asked for a written assessment search, and vat informed that the total charges were $385'and this charge for a sever lateral connection vas not given to him. Councilman Sheridan informed Mr,, Schimedeke that when he called he was given present assessments against the property, and the future property owner by asking for a written search, asked for both the present and future assessments against the property. Councilman Wright stated that it would not be possible for the City to ascertain that a sever lateral connection charge had not been made against this property unless a request was received for a written assessment search. blotion by Sheridan to amend the motion and spread the sum of $346 for the sewer connection charge against Lot 1, Block 4, Ostm n ®a 3rd Addition. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • OTE UPON THE ORIGINAL 140TION: Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the amended motion carried unanimously. Motion by Wright to approve General and Public Utilities Claims #6894 through #7016 for payment. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Kirkham to approve Liquor Claim #7926 through #7989 for payment. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMATES: Councilman Thompson asked the City Manager to provide the Council with a summary of tornado cleanup costs. The City Manager stated that he could provide the Council with such a summary. The.City Manager stated that the City teceived a 757. advance payment of the estimates of the cost of disaster cleanup. lfttioa by Kirkham to approve the following estimates for payment8 • THE COUNCIL MINMS OF 11/8/65 PAGE 11 • Keys Well Drilling Co. 413 No. Lexington Parkway St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Estimate #7 - Water Improvement Project No. $ 11,812.28 75-A (Partial) (Three Additional Drift Wells) Estimate #8 - Water Improvement Project No. 75 -A (Partial) (Three Additional Drift Wells) $ 19395.90 F. D. Chapman Construction Company 2809 Alabama Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Estimate #4 - Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement Project No.. 70 (Partial) (Riverview Terrace, south of Mississippi Place; Lincoln (Asbton) Street, south of Ironton Street; 5th Street, south of T.H. #100) $ 4919015 F. D. Chapman Construction Company and Randall & Berglin (A Joint Venture) 2809 Alabama Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 • Estimate #3 - Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 73 and Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 73 -A (Partial) (54th & Innsbruck 5th Addition) $ 20,345.31 hurley Construction Company 49 Signal 11111s St. Paul, Minnesota 55118 Estimate #5 - Sanitary Sever and Water Improvement Project No. 67 and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 68 (1964 Sanitary Sewer, Water, and Storm Sewer Construction (See page 73 of Council Meeting Agenda for September 20, 1964 for detail) (Final) $ 3,216.08 Parry A. Swenson Company, Incorporated 432 Endicott Building St. Paul, Minnesota Estimate #2 (Partial) Tornado Damage - Fridley Iron Removal Plant, Fridley Well Houses #1, #3, #4 $ 99599.90 D. W. Harstad Company, Inc. 7101 Highway #65 Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 • • is TM COUNCU MOOTES OF 11/8/65 Estimate #1 (Partial) Tornado Damage - Civil Defense Building - Assessor9s Office Estimate #1 (Partial) Tornado Damage Shorewood Lounge Estimate #1 (Partial) Tornado Damage 375 - 64th Avenue N. E. Estimate #1 (Partial) Tornado Damage Fridley City Hall PAGE 12 $ 81.94 $1,679.60 $ 500.94 $6,276.97 Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Thompson to approve the following estimates of debris cleanup for payments Estimate #1 (Partial) Julian M. Johnson and Ted Renollett Contractors, 6725 Channel Road, Fridley, Minnesota for work completed this date on cleanup of the dump on 73rd Avenue and East of University Avenue. Dump cleanup to date $18,875.00 Less 5% Withholding 943.75 PAM MT THIS ESTIUM 17 931.255 Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. I.iCBNL Councilmen Sheridan asked whether the City Fire Inspector made an inspection of all dwellings for which an application for license was made and whether such an inspection is up to date. The City Manager stated that he does not know whether the Fire Inspector completed all the inspections required, but that he will do to shortly. Notion by Sheridan to approve the application for licenses and append the list to the minutes. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PS? AO_R #30 -1%5 FOR IIlPBOVEMLfiTT OF JEFFERSON STREET TO 58TH AVE= NOUHRAST: Councilman Sheridan stated that this petition is for the improvement of a street which costs may be only assessed on the west side of the street since the ersebo tt Is 30 feet wide, and what would normally be the east half of the street has building sites upon it. Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer whether the City has done any work on this street. The City Engineer stated that Mr. Benjamin wanted the City to remove the sand which could not be used in the street construction from the street. The City Engineer stated that the City did so and that in doing so, the street was offset around four trees located on the TW COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/8165 PACE 13 street easement. He stated that he did this in order to comply With the wishes of the Council not to destroy any more trees than necessary. He stated that now Mr. Benjamin would like to have the trees removed from the easement, Councilman Sheridan asked the City Engineer whether the specifications for street construction are four inches of sub -base material with a one and one- half inch paving mat. The City Engineer answered, "Fes." Councilman Sheridan asked the City Engineer what is the proportion of cost of each of these materials. The City Engineer answered that the proportion is about 50%. Councilman Sheridan asked the City Engineer to compute the cost of the sub material and the cost of the paving mat and inform the Council what these costs are. Mayor Nee stated that after the coats are computed, the City Engineer or the City Manager should refer these costs to Mr. Benjamin and find out whether Mr. Benjamin and the other property owner is willing to pay the costs for improvement of the street. Potion by Sheridan to receive Petition #30-1965 and refer it to the Administration for processing. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, thexa being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. The City Manager stated that this petition is signed by 50% of the property owners owning 60% of the front footage along this street. He stated that • the property owners want construction of curb, gutter and street. Motion by Wright to receive Petition #31 -1965 and refer it to the Administration for processing. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays. the motion carried unanimously. BUILDING PERMIT - 339 - 57TH 'PLACE NORTMWT - RICHARD MILUM S The City Manager stated that this request for a building permit was made to the City in the month of July and referred to the Fridley Housing and Redevelop- went Authority since it was thought that there would be an Urban Renewal Project In this part of the City. He stated that the property owner indicated, when he made the application, that he was willing to build upon this site a structure to suit the Urban Rewmal Authority's plans. He stated that since it has been deterained that there will probably not be an Urban Renewal Project in the City of Fridley, the owner pants to restore the condition of the present house to the original. The City Manager stated that the Building inspector finds that this structure is not in very good shape and would like to see the structure brought up to code. The Council examined an aerial map showing the location of this structure. Motion by Wright to grant the request of Richard Miller for a Building Permit to repair a house at 339 -57th Place Northeast, subject to Mr. Miller bringin the entire building up to standards of the City Code. Seconded by-Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the emotion carried unanimously. THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/8/65 PAGE 14 CONSiDSRATION OF PURCHASE OF TATS FOR TOT LOT: Mayor Nee asked whether the Park Board has considered the purchase of this property. The City Manager stated that the Park Board considered the purchase of this property in the past, but the price the owner asked for the property was too high. The City Manager stated that the Park Director examined the property and feels that the lots could be used for recreational purposes. Mayor Nee asked whether this item should be referred to the Park Board. The City Manager stated that he believes it would be good to refer it to the Park Board. The City Manager stated that there is no way the owner can build upon this property without installing sewer and water services to the property and constructing a cul -de -sac on Lot 3 to provide access to the property. He stated that this would provide only one building site upon the two lots. Councilmen Thompson stated thst he was a ,ember of the Park Board when the Park Board examined the site A years ago and found that the contour of the lots made it acceptable for a recreation site. He stated that he would be willing to vote on the project at this Council Meeting since the price which the owner is asking for this lot is better than the original price. Council- man Sheridan stated that the price the owner is asking for this lot amounts to purchasing a good lot and getting an additional lot free. He asked whether the City owns Lots 1 and 2.. The City.Engineer answered that the City owns Lots 1 and 2 with the water tower being ou Lot I and a booster station on Lot 2. Motions by Kirkham to refer consideration of the purchase of Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Horizon Heights Addition to the Park Board for consideration and recommendation to the Council at the regular nesting on December 6, 1965. • Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. STREET LIGHTS NOT INCLUDED IN THE 1965 PROGRAM: The City Manager stated that he received a suggestion for installation of one street light in addition to the six given in the agenda to be located at the beginning of the bulge of the cul -de -sac on the dead -end street going past the Embers property. Councilman Wright stated that there would be no immediate benefit from the installation of this :street light. He suggested that if the curers wish to pay for it, the City could include it in the project. Councilmen Kirkham stated that he would suggest that this light be omitted from the project until there is a real anted for it. The City Manager stated that there is a possibility the County might pay for installation of street lights on either and of the Main Street bridge since Main Street is a County road. Councilmen Sheridan stated that, since the diasnnnds and cloverleafss located along the interstate Highway #694 will be lighted by the Minnesota Highway Department, perhaps these would provide a sufficient amount of light, that the City could remove some street lights adjacent to the freeway and not install some of the lights adjacent to the freeway. The City Manager stated that he believes it is likely the Minnesota Highway Department will install a street light at the intersection of 53rd Avenue Northeast with T.H. #65, and in that event, the City could have the street light rmaoved, or if the street light were installed by the Minnesota Highway Department before that time, the City would simply omit the street light from the program. . Motion by Wright to approve the installation of six additional street lights not included in the 1965 program se submitted in the agenda to the Council. Seconded by Kirkham,. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 5 T8g COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/8/65 PAGE 15 SyLGH r PERMIT ; 7325 CENTRAL AVENUE NORTWAST - AFRICAN_ LEGIONS • Councilman Wright noted that the application for a sign permit made by Leroy Signs, Incorporated for a Fridley American Legion sign Was not complete. He stated that it does not show where on the property of the American Legion this sign will be located. Motion by Wright to approve and grant the request of Leroy Signs, Inc. for a permit for construction of a sign upon the Fridley American Legion property at 7325 Central Avenue Northeast. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. $10 ,PBRMZT - SBCREWOOD CENTER,: COUNTRY CLUB T; Camcilmsn Wright asked whether this sign will be illuminated. The City Manager stated that nowhere on the application: does it state whether or not the sign will be illuminated, and he does not have this information. Council- men Wright stated that he presumes the steel letters will be floodlit in some manner. Motion by Kirkham to grant a sign permit to Brede, Inc. for construction of the Cocmtry Club Market sign an the Shorewood Center Building. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unani- movsly. Motion by Thompson to adopt Resolution #195 -1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ►�7 Notion by Wright to adopt Resolution #196 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. #197 -1965 AUTHCBIEING AND DIRECTING THE Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution 0197 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mayo' Nee stated that he is presenting this proposed ordinance to the Council, and that in his opinion, this ordinance is a necessity to provide means for the City to accomplish by direct action what might also be accomplished in part • through Federal Urban Renewal projects. He stated that he believes the most THE COUNCIL MINUTES or 11/8/65 PAGE 16 valid criticism of the proposed Urban Renewal Program was that the City had • not exhausted all means at its disposal, before attempting Urban Renewal. Mayor Nee stated that he asked the City Attorney to survey Rousing Codes in other cities and draw an ordinance to adopt a model housing code which could be presented to the Council for consideration. He stated that this proposed ordinance would be coordinated with the uniform building code and provides for adoption of a housing code by reference. The City Attorney stated that he discussed various housing codes with Mr. Modus, and Mr. Hodne mentioned three codes for use in the City of Fridley. He stated that these codes were the American Public Health Code, the Code of the City of Minneapolis, and the Uniform Housing Code. The City Attorney stated that the American Public Health Code is concerned mostly with public health matters related to the construction and operation of tenements. He stated he does not believe this cede would be as applicable to construction in the City of Fridley as the Uniform Housing Code. The City Attorney stated that the same holds true for the City housing Code-of Minneapolis. The City Attorney stated that the Uniform Housing Code is a small owe amounting to 20 pages and that half the 20 pages provide definitions of tens used in the Uniform Housing Code. The City Attorney explained that the ordinance which he drew provides for several exceptions to the Uniform Housing Code: Section 51.04.aprovides that the Planning Commission ccsn�stitute the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board; Section 51.04.b#r5videe that penalties for failure to conform to the Uniform Housing Code be the &sme as set forth in Chapter 105 of the Fridley City Code; Section 51.04,c provides that the City 11=m, -er be designated the Building Official as provided for in said Uniform Housing Code and the City • Manager be authorized to designate one or more officials of the City as deputies; Section 5 .d provides that multiple dwellings registration for the City of Fridley shall be continued and not repealed by the adoption of the Uniform Housing Code; and Section 51.04.e provides that the Dangerous Building Ordinance not be repealed by the adoption of this Uniform Housing Code. The City Attorney stated that he asked the FAnsneaota league of Municipalities for information catcernisng housing codes used by other cities, and was informed that the City of Forgus Falls and the City of St. Louis Park to addition to the City of Fridley use the Uniform Housing Code. He stated that information that the City of Fridley uses the Uniform Housing Code is incorrect. The City Attorney (stated that be made an attempt to got a sufficient nusmber of copies of the Uniform Housing Code to present to the Council. He stated, Dever, that he was unable to obtain these copies, but he believed they could be obtained for examination by the Council at a future Ming. The City Attorney stated that he provided that the Planning Commission be the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board since the Planning Commission is closer to the Council, and the Planning Commission could refer to the Board of Appeals whatever i.te w night be appropriately considered by the Board of Appeals. The City Attorney stated that the informa.ti.oa and the coders might be useful to the Fridley Houtring and Redevelopment Authority. The City Attorney stated that the Uniform Dousing Code deals with houser only and not with commercial properties. He suggested that the Council adopt the ordinance to designate Chapter 51 and adopt a Housing Code upon first- reading at this meeting, then after studying copies of the Uniform Routing Code, the Council could suggest any other amendments which might be needed. TM COUNCIL MINUTES Of 11/8/65 PAGE 17 Councilman Sheridan stated that he would like to see copies of the Uniform Housing Code before acting upon this ordinance. Mayor Nee asked if the Council adopted this ordinance upon first reading at this Council Meeting, when the second reading would be. The City Attorney answered that the second reading could take place 7 days later. Mayor Nee asked whether it would be possible for the Planning Commission to study the Uniform Housing Code before the Regular Council Meeting of December 6th. The City Manager answered, "Yes." Mayor Nee stated that he is convinced that the City of Fridley needs to adopt a housing code such an the Uniform Housing Code. Councilman Wright stated that this matter could be passed upon first reading and referred to the Planning Commission, and studied by the Planning Commission, before the Council adopts the ordinance upon second reading. Councilman Sheridan stated that he would prefer to refer the matter to the Planning Ccmissiou first and ask them to study it. He stated that he did not like to vote on a subject which he has not studied. The City Attorney stated that he discussed the use of a building code wyth the Building Inspector and was informed by the Building Inspector that he is wing the Uniform Building Code of 1961 rather than the later Unifora Building Code of 1963. He stated that he believes the Building Inspector should adopt the changes and conform to the Uniform Building Code of 1963. Councilman Kirkham stated that he did not wish to vote on the ordinance this evening. Motion by Thompson to authorize the City Manager to order 20 copies of the . Uniform Housing Code and refer consideration of the ordinance providing for a Uniform Housing Code to the Planning Commission. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PURCHASE OF HEATERS FOR = WASHROOH BUILDING OF Tit's MOQU LAn BEACMIOUSE: The City Manager stated that this item is a cost of less than $1000 and could be installed without advertising for bids. He stated, however, that he ,wished to have the Council authorize the Administration to purchase and install these heaters. Mayor Nee asked whether it would be possible to use the wash- room building in the wintertime if these heaters are not installed. The City Manager answered that it would not be possible. The City Engineer stated further that because of the high water table in this area, it is necessary to heat the slab of the washroom building at a temperature above freezing to keep the slab from being damaged by frost. Motion by Thompson to authorize the Administration to purchase and install heaters in the washroom building of the Moore Lake beachhouse. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY --BLAINE AGREEMENT POP. IMPROVEMNT OF COUNTY DITCH #17: 9w City Manager stated that the Council previously discussed improvement of County ditch #17 with the City Council of Blaine in a joint meeting. He stated that the Council agreed to the principles of the agreement at that time, and this agreement would formalize the action of the City Council. The City Manager stated that Anoka County needs this agreement before they can begin work to improve County ditch #17. THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/8/65 PACE 18 • The City Attorney stated that this evening is the first time he has scan a copy of this agreement. He stated that he discussed it with the City Engineer and the City Engineer informed his that the agreement provides for . construction of an open ditch and the cost is not significant. The City Engineer stated that he Mould like to point out that if at any time Fridley should decide to enclose the open ditch and pipe the storm sever, the cost would be tremendous. He stated that as long as the ditch remains an open ditch with no more piping than the culverts needed under roads and rail- road, the cost to the City of Fridley would not be great. Councilman Wright asked the City Engineer whether it was the purpose of the agreement that there Mould be only improvement of an open ditch with the installation of culverts where necessary to cross roads. The City Engineer answered, "Yes." Mayor Nee stated that the Village of Blaine made agreements for a contract on the basis of the Joint Council Meating with the City of Fridley, and Mould need this resolution in.order to act on those contracts. The City Manager stated that if the Council sees fit to adopt this agreement, it would be necessary for the Council to pass a resolution to do so. The City Attorney ouggested that the Council adopt a motions authorizing the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the agreement, and ordering the City Attorney to prepare a resolution and place the same on the agenda of the following Council Meeting. Ration by Sheridan to authorise the City Manager and the Mayor to execute an' agreement between the City of Fridley and the City of Blaine for improvement of County ditch #17, and direct the Administrations to prepare the appropriate resolution for consideration by the Council at the regular Council Meeting of November 15, 1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Sheridan stated that he wished to have the Council authorise the City Manager to ask Hodne Associates to review the plans for construction of 61st Avenue Northeast on the property of Mr. Sasliterman east of T.H. #65. Councilman Sheridan stated that businessmen in the area questioned whether the prevent plans are the beat possible layout for this road. He stated that he believes Mr. Hodne should be able to answer the questions of the business- men concerning layout of the road. Motion by Sheridan to authorise the City Manager to request Hodne Associates to review the layout of 61st Avenue Northeast, asst of T.H. #65, on the property of Mr. Saliterman. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOUBNi`f3NT., There being no further business, Mayor Nee declared the Special Council Meeting of November 8, 1965 adjourned at 10:27 P.M. Respectfully submitted, 0 ;r, ,� Raymond E. Bade Secretary to the Council PAGE 19 THE MINUTES OF Ti8 REGULAR COUNCIL METING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1965 • A regular cuing of the Council of the City of Fridley was called to order by Mayor Nero at 8515 P.M. 8. OLL CALL Xmbers Presents Nee, Kirkham, Sheridan, Wright, Thompson Members Absents None APPROVAL cw MINUTBS= SPECIAL COUNCIL mmiG. CANVASS (z VOTES. NayEam S. 19651 Notion by Thompson to adopt the minutes of the Special Council 1Se4tia9 for the Canvass of votes of November 50 1965 as submitted. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried Vmanimously. B U'O SEARING Tl�� - ST.19G6. is The City Manager read the Notice of Hearing. Mayor Nee stated that it is the general position of the Council that no street Improvements will be ordered unless the majority of the citizens wish to have the street improved. Mayor Net stated that most of the streets proposed for is improvement in 1966 are included in the program as a result of a petition signed by over 507. of the property owners. Mayor Nee stated that where the City has received a petition signed by more than 507. of the property owners, the vote of at least three council members is necessary to order the iimprovement, and if a petition signed by less than 507. of the property owners has been received, or no petition has been received, at least four votes of the Council are required to order in the improvement. Mayor Nee stated that, in this list of streets, only two of the streets were petitioned for improvement to the extent that more than 507. of the property owners signed the petition. He stated that the cost of improving these streets is estimated at $9.40 per front foot for the street. Mayor Nee stated that improvement of the street will require construction of a storm sewer system. The c*st of the stoma sewer system is estimated at $2.65 per hundred square feet, amounting to $72.80 for a 25 foot by 110 foot lot. Mayor Nee stated that construction of the storm sewer system is not necessarily a part of the project and could be deleted depending upon which streets are included in the project. Mayor Nee risked the visitors whether anyone wished to comment upon the street improvement. A visitor asked which streets could be improved without the construction of the storm sewer. Mayor Nee anavered that in general the storm sewer system would provide drainage for the ontiie area, but that all of the streets could be improved with the oxcoption of Riverview Terrace without construction of the storm sewer. Mayor Net stated that, if this were done, vator drainage from thn ,e Gtre.et5 taoujd be an the surface of the street instead of underground. TW COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11 " 65 PACE 20 • Mayor Nee asked the visitors present how many of the property owners on Kimball Street favored construction of the improvement on Kimball Street. None of the visitors present favored this construction. Mayor Nee asked how many opposed Improvement of Kimball Street. Two visitors present opposed construction of Kimball Street. Mayor Nee asked how many visitors favored construction of the improvement on Glencoe Street, and how many opposed this improvement. One visitor favored the improvement and one visitor opposed the improvement. Mayor Nee asked how many favored construction of the improvement on Hugo Street, and how many opposed it. Six favored the construction and two opposed it. Mayor Nee also asked the visitors how many opposed and how many favored the improvement of Janesville Street and Ironton Street. A visitor to the Council Meeting stated that he favored improvement of Glencoe Street since the street washee every time it rains. He stated that the gravel street creates a dirty condition in the homes of the residents, and makes hazardous driving in the ,wintertime. The visitor stated that the cost of the improvement is rising each year, and the cost to the City of maintenance of the street is great. Re stated that, regardless of weather conditions at the time, the street is generally in miserable condition for driving. Another visitor stated that there is no need for the improvement of Sago Street. Be stated that there is too much traffic on Hugo Street nor, and . paving it will increase the amount of traffic on the street. He stated, further, that persons favoring this improvement need drivers training, because they favor the improvement only so they could travel up the hill on Hugo Street. This visitor stated that he lived on Hugo Street for 18 years and could stand living there for another 18 years without seeing the improvement made. Zie visitor asked if the City had any figures on the cost of fill and grading for these streets. Councilman Sheridan answered that the Engineering Department and Street Department do not break down the cost of maintenance for each street, but keep records of the costs and maintenance for the entire City. Councilman Sheridan pointed out that maintenance of dirt streets used up most of the street maintenance budget last year, and that the greatest share of these costs was for grading them. Mayor Nee stated that it is in the best interests of the City to have all these streets paved. Another visitor to the Council Meeting arcked if there were any petitions for the improvement of Glencoe, Sago, and Longfellow Streets. The City Manager answered that there were no petitions for Longfellow Street. Mayor Nee stated that the City Engineer added three streets to the street improvement project, since these three streets would be included in the storm sewer district necessary for the construction of streets for which the City received petitions for Improvement. Another visitor to the Council Meeting asked when the water hole on Longfellow Street will be filled. He stated that this mater hole to a continual nuisance . to his property, and mattes it difficult for people to travel on Longfellow Street. He stated that there is one foot of water in the hole now. 9w visitor TM COMX'1L MINMS OP 11115/65 PAGE 21 • stated further that this condition has caused breaks in his sever Mice, that the breaks occurred at the connection of bin runout to the City lateral, and cost him $40 each tier the connection was broken.. Mayor Nee informed the visitor that if he could obtain a petition signed by the majority of the property owners on Longfellow Street, the City would include it in the improvement program. Mother visitor asked what improvements are contemplated for Riverview Terrace. The City Engineer answered that the City plans to construct a 24 foot roadway an Riverview Terrace if it can obtain help from the Federal Goveremmeat to protect the riverbank. Mayor Nee stated that it would be necessary to provide riprap and fill along Riverview Terrace in order to make-paving of Riverview Terrace worthwhile. He stated that the City has reviewed costs for v1prepping to support the riverbank along all of Riverview Terrace, and the City °s share of these costs mould amount to approximately $350,000. Mayor Has stated that the City oould not afford to carry on this project without Federal help. A visitor to the Council Meeting asked what will be the width of the streets. The City Engineer answered that the width would be 31 feet. The City Engineer stated that if Riverview Terrace and Broad Street are not included In this improvement, the cost of the improvement would be reduced to approxi- mately $8 per front foot. Mayor Nee stated that the reason for this reduction In cost is that the casts of improvement on Riverview Terrace are assessed against tbs property an only one side of the street. A visitor to the Council • Ming asked whether the property on the cast -vest streets connecting with Riverview Terrace will be assessed again when Riverview Terrace is improved. Mayor Nee stated that normally cross streets are assessed one -half block back from the intersection for the Improvement of aide streets along with 1/3 the front footage of side yard lot lines along the side street. Mayor Nee stated, hdwsver, that some of these properties face Riverview Terrace and this would implicate the assessment for construction of Riverview Terrace. A visitor to the Cowell Meeting asked if two or three of the streets in this area were paved, what would be done with the stores sever construction in the future. Mayor Use stated that normally the City tries to avoid the use of%alley gutters to carry water acre" street intersections. Mayor Nee stated, however, that if the construction of storm sever to carry the eater sway from the street intersections is too expensive, the City would u8sTalley gutters for this purpose. Mayor Has stated that if any portion of this storm sewer system is constructed, then assessments would be levied against the entire stores sewer district whether the paving was done or not. Councilman Wright stated that the visitors present should talk to their neigbbors, taking note of the facts given at this hearing, and submit revised petitions for the Improvements. Councilman Wright stated that, if the Council receives a petition by November 30th, the petition can be processed by December 6th, and the Council could act on the Improvement at that time. A visitor asked whether these petitions would be acted on by the Council by street or by area. Mayor Nee stated that the Council will consider the improvement of one street at a time. Mayor Nee stated that the Administration will draw a resolution ordering in the Ugrovement for the Council Meeting of December 6th, and the C ounc.il twill advise the City Manager what streets to include in this THE COIMCIL MnV=S OF 11115/65 PACE 22 • improvement before that time. He stated that the citizens should bring in revised petitions so it will be possible for the Councilmen to determine what streets should be improved. 75TH AVENUE - OLD CENTRAL AVMUZ TO BACOU DRIVES Mayor Neu► stated that it is necessary to construct some sewer and water connections before it will be possible to pave 75th Avenue from Central to Bacon Drive, lie stated that the cost of paving the street does not include the cost of these connections, and was estimated at $8170 per front foot. Mayor Nee asked whether any of the visitors at the Council Meeting favored or opposed this improvement. No one commented upon this improvement. 2NIV�8R3_Z= AVENi1E WT SERVICE DRIVE - 73RD, AM= TO 75TH AVMW NORTWABTt Mayor Nee stated that costs for this improvement are considerably higher than costs of other improvements, since the property on one side of the street mast bear the entire cost of the improvement. He stated that the costs of the aprovement are estimated to be $16 per front foot. Mayor Nee asked whether anyone present at the Council Naeting favors or objects to construction of this Improvement. There were no comments upon this improvement. PROPOSED STRERT, MADISON STEIN - LYRIC LANG TO OSBMNE ROAD: Mayor Neu asked whether any visitors at the Council Meeting wished to comment upon the improvement and construction of proposed Madison Street. There were • no comments an this improvement. Mayor Nee stated that construction of these improvements includes construction of a necessary storm sewer estimated to cost $2.90 per hundred square feet. Mayor Nee stated that the cost of street improvement is estimated at $10.78 per front foot., Mayor Nee stated that the petition for this improvement was signed by 53% of the property owners, and that a petition against the Improve- went was also submitted to the City. A visitor to the Council Meeting asked whether the City received a petition for the improvement of 69th Way from East River Road to Hickory Drive. Mayor Nee answered that the City has not received such a petition, but included 69th Avenue in this construction since the Council believes it would be beneficial to the City to,have this street improved. The visitor stated that he believes the'-property owners one 69th Avenue-are opposed to this improvement. Another visitor asked why they were informed that it would be necessary to build concrete streets because the water table is fairly high in this area, and the City is now proposing construction of blacktop streets. Mayor Nee answered that construction of the storms sewer system would relieve the condition caused by the high water table and not make it necessary to build concrete streets. Another visitor asked why cost estimates are higher then the costs quoted for construction of the street before. Mayor Nee answered that the previous costs T88 COUNCIL MIMMS (W 11/15/65 PAGE 23 given to these property owners were based on a favorable contract vhich the City obtained for street construction. He stated that costs of street con- struction generally rise each year and this estimate reflects the increased cost. Another visitor stated that he signed the petition for construction of the street improvement in the belief the storm sever was not included in the construction of the street, but if it would be necessary to construct a storm sewer system he did not know whether he would favor construction of these streets or not. Councilman Wright stated that there was a delay between the time the petition was given to the City for the improvement and the time the estimates were made for improvement of the street. He stated that if the signers of the petition find the cost of the improvemmt is too great, the City will allow anyone to remove his name from the petition. Mrs. George Belly, 50 - 70th Place, stated that she objects to construction of the improvMent, and signed a petition against the improvement. We. Kelly stated that she is tho owner of Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block 14, Outman's Third Addition. Daniel F. Rile, 6957 Hickory Drive Northeast, stated that he questions why his entire lot should be assessed at the rate of $2.90 per hundred square feet for construction of the storm sewer. Mayor New stated that the front of this lot would be assessed for the construction of the storm sever, but that the rear of the lot drains into Locke Lake and would not be assessed for construction of the storm ewer. He stated that the estimated assessment for construction of the storm sever system to this lot is $261.15. ! F -- Mayor Nee stated that it is necessary to constrict a stoma sever system in this area, and the cost to property owners in the area is estimated at $4.05 per hundred square feet. He stated that the cost of paving the east -vest easement is estimated at $7.07 per grout foot for a paving width of 30 feet. A visitor to the Council Meeting stated that he objects to including his property in the storm sever assessment because the water on his property drains onto his property from East River Road. The City Saginear stated that when this improvement is completed, the water from East River Road will not drain onto his property. Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer where the catch basin will be located. The City Engineer answered that he does not know where the catch basin will be placed at this tune. Couucilman Wright stated that construction of the storm saver System will collect water from East River Road and not allow the water from East River Road to drain onto this property. Mayor Nee asked,evhether there were any objections to construction of this Improvement. there were no objections to this proposal. PZSM STREET - S�TA1,.tTXNG 700 FEET SOUTH OF MISSIMIPPX STREET TO 63RD AVEDTUE8 Mayor Nee stated that the estimated cost of this construction is $10.65 per front foot. Be stated that tho City received a petition signed by 657. of the property oars favoring this improvement. Mr. oviradon, 6350 Pierce Street Northeast, vas present at the Council Meeting and spoke in favor of this . improvement. Ede stated that there is a water hole in front of his house, and that care cannot drive through this avaterhole without getting stuck, so people drive over his property instead of the street. He stated thst he called the !D8 COUNCIL MIM3E3 of 11%15%65 PAG8 24 police and asked them to stop people from driving across his yard but the police were unable to find someone in the act of driving across his yard and did not stop them. He stated he did not wish to sign a complaint against his neighbors who find it necessary to drive through his yard instead of using the City street. Councilman Sheridan stated that the improvement will raise the level of the street at this point and that the depth of the hole at the present time is only 19" above Moore hake. He stated that if the street is resurfaced, this water could drain into Moore Lake. W. and Mrs. Leighton Clark, 1128 - 63rd Avenue Northeast, stated that they would be the only persons paying for construction of the improvement on 63rd Avenue Northeast. Two persons favored this improvement and one opposed the improvement. Mayor Nee stated that the coat of street construction for this project is estimated at $11.95 per front foot. Be stated that the City Administration received a letter from the Knights of Columbus protesting the extension of Lucia Lane to the service drive of T.H. #65. He stated that the letter was dated November 15, 1965. Robert Minder stated that he would like to see the City extend the improvement to include construction of a part of Channel Road. Be stated that he wished to have the entire improvement, including a part of Channel Road, completed • at one time. Mayor Nee stated that he does not believe inclusion of Channel Road would change the rate of assessment for the project. Mr, Don Harstad, representing the Knights of Columbus, asked the width of. the proposed construction of T.H. #65 East Service Drive. The City Engineer answered that the width would_be 28 feet. Mr. Harstad stated that the insights of Columbus are not anxious for construction of a connection between Lucia Lase and the East Service Drive. He stated that the Knights of Columbus do not want construction of curb and gutter on the side of the service drive nearest the Knights of Columbus building, they are only interested in having the street paved. He stated that the parking lot for the Knights of Columbus building is not completely laid out, and that he believes it would be better if automobiles would be able to drive from T.H. #65 East Service Drive into the parking lot at any point, rather than having to use definite driveways. Councilman Sheridan asked the City Engineer whether construction of the East Service Drive includes concrete curb and gutter on both sides of the service drive. The City Engineer answered that this is correct and matches standards which the City follows in street construction. Councilman Sheridan stated that the Minnesota Highway Department does not provide curb and gutter on both sides of the service drives, but only on the Bide nearest the highway. The City Engineer stated that if concrete curb and gutter are omitted on one side of the service drive, the cost for construction of the street improvement will be lower by approximately $2.15 per front foot. Mr. Berated stated that If the City eliminates construction of concrete curb and gutters from this improvement, the Knighte of Columbus may favor improvement of the cross street. Mr. Minder stated that he would prefer that half the empty lot which he owns on the T.H. #65 East Service Drive not have concrete curb and gutter. He THE COUNCIL, MINMS OF 11/15/65 PAGE 25 • stated that the concrete curb and gutter, if it is installed, may have to be removed to make provision for driveways or parking lots depending upon what use to made of this lot in the future. Mayor Nee asked W. Minder whether he Mould suggest that the City drain the water from the street into the highway ditch rather than into a storm sewer system. Mr. Minder said, Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer whether such a plan would be workable. The City Engineer said "Yes." Mr. Minder stated that he would favor construction ,of an asphalt rolled curb along this street. A visitor to the Council Meeting stated that he owns property across the street from an apartment house. He stated that no one used this road until the construction of the apartment house. He stated that the construction of this road is for the use of apartment building residents and does not benefit his aen property. He stated that he owns 297 feet of street frontage and has paid for construction of street along 160 feet of the frontage. He stated that the road was never repaired after the apartment was built. He stated that when the apartment building was built, the contractor brought in heavy equipment which broke up the road. Mayor Nee stated that this hearing is not an assessment hearing, the actual assessments will be determined at a separate assessment hearing and the property owners would receive credit for the part of the construction which can be used to make the new construction, such as, any useable base on the present street. He stated that this would reduce the cost to approximately $11 per foot. Mr, Gibbs was present at the Council Meeting representing the apartment house owner and he stated the apartment house owner favors construction of this street improvement. A visitor asked how Lucia Lane will be drained once the improvement is made. The City Engineer answered that the Mater will run down the street into a bete where the water is running now. Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer whether he would consider draining water from the hole at the end of Lucia Lane as part of this construction project. The City Engineer answered, "No." IV. HArstad stated that the Knights favor construction of the improvement of T.Ho #65 East Service Drive. SERVICE DRIVE EAST OF T.H. #65 - SHOREWOOD LOU US NGE TO 63RD AVENs w r ! Mayor Nee stated that the cost of this construction is $16.81 per front foot. as asked if there are any objections to the proposed construction. Mr. Gibson, a property owner owning property along T.H. #65 East Service Drive, was present at the Council Meeting, and stated that he has no objections to this improvement. There were no objections to the improvement. . Mayor Nee stated that no atom sewer construction is planned with this improve - ment. He instated that the cost of the street improvement is estimated to be $9.99 per front foot. THE COUNCIL. MINUTES CP 11/15/65 PAGE 26 Mr. Raymond Carlson stated that he believes the Council has a petition signed • by 18 property owners of the 22 living in this area. Be stated that the condition of the streets at the present time is send, that nand is blown around by the wind creating a condition for residents similar to living on the Sahara Desert. A visitor to the Council Ming stated that he liked the desert and that 997. of the problem concerns construction on McKineey Street. He stated that he believes the improvement should be extended on McKinley Street between Mississippi Street and 66th Avenue Northeast. He stated that there is a big waterhole on this street making it difficult for persons to drive down McKinley Street to Mississippi Street, and he opposes construction of McKinley Street unless this portion of McKinley Street also is drained and improved. He stated that there is little traffic on this portion of McKinley Street, that it is a two block long, dead end street which is generally flooded with water for a least one block, and this condition will continue after improvement of the street. The visitor asked whether construction of Stinson Boulevard includes curb and gutter on both sides of Stinson Boulevard. Mayor Net answered, "No." He stated that it Includes construction of k of Stinson Boulevard with curb and gutter on one side. MWOr Nee WM4 visitors to the Council tenting if the City paves k of Stinson Boulevard and puts curb and gutter on one side, whether the people Mould be milling to pay for construction of the street. One visitor answered that if the cost is $10 per foot, he would be willing to see Stinson Boulevard paved and improved. Councilman Wright stated that the City favors construction of McKinley Street between 66th Avenue and 66h Avenue now, but that construction of a storm sewer to drain the hole in McKinley Street between 66th Avenue and Mississippi Street will be completed at a later date to slake construction of a portion of the street feasible at the present time. The visitor answered that paving will wash at the intersection of McKinley and 66th Avenue Northeast if the i rovement does not extend to Mississippi Street. He stated that water will undermine the paving and the paving will break up. A visitor $rated that this is the third time he has circulated a petition in this area for Improvement of these streets. He stated that the main reason people do not wish to sign a petition for improvement between 66th Avenue and Mississippi Street on McKinley Street is that they do not wish to pay for draining this portion of the street. Mayor Nee asked how many of the visitors favored construction of this project. Fourteen visitors favored construction of the project and four opposed it. Mayor Nee stated that construction of a storm sewer is required as part of this improvement project. He stated that construction cost of this storm serer project is estimated to be $3.96 per hundred square feet. Construction of the street improvement project is estimated to cost $7.33 per front foot. Mr. Harold Schroeder, 8466 Ruth Street Northeast, stated that he believes all three streets are in dire need of paving, especially Liberty Street where the THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/15/65 PAGE 27 • fill washes into the bottom lands along Liberty Street. Mr. Schroeder stated that Ruth Street is impassable when it rains. He stated that the appearance of the neighborhood isnst helped by the condition of the streets. He stated that wind blows the dust around creating a bad condition for the neighborhood, and improvement of the streets will lower the cost, to the City, of maintaining these streets. Be rotated that costs of the improvement will be more in the future, and the only reason for opposing this construction, as far as he was concerned, is the cost of the construction at the present time. Be stated that he favors construction of the improvement as do the other property owners. One visitor stated that be opposes construction of Liberty Street, and be stated he does not believe there is a petition for the improvement of Liberty Street. Another visitor stated that he opposes the construction of Liberty Street because construction of the improvement requires construction of a storms sewer system. Another visitor asked if there was a petition for the construction of Longfellow. Mayor Nee answered, "Yes," and stated that there is much rental property on Longfellow Street and, for this reason, many of the petitioners were unable to obtain the signatures of a majority of the property owners. A visitor asked why proposals for improvement of streets in this area were changed from the last proposal xade the previous year. Councilman Sheridan answered that the only change made in the proposal is that Ashton Street be improved with MSA funds. Be stated that construction of Ashton Street with • MSA funds will not add additional coat to the residents for this improvement. The visitor asked why the City does not move Ashton Street elsewhere in order to place the full cast of construction of Ashton Street upon the industrial property owners. Councilman Sheridan stated that the easement for Ashton Street has been dedicated to the City and the City would have to abandon this easement and acquire another easement with good cause for doing so in order to move Ashton Street. Another visitor stated that he objected to the improvement since construction of the street will include construction along undeveloped property, and future connections of sewer and water will ruin the street. He stated also that it will be impossible to tell where driveways for these houses will be located. Councilman Sheridan answered that connections to the sewer and water services could be made 5 feet from the curb line of the street and such construction should not damage the street. He stated that curbing will be shaped such that a driveway can run to the end of the curbing and it will not be necessary to build special drive aprons on the curbing in order to build driveways to the street. EAST RMR ROAD EAST SERVICE DRIVE -_ 79TH AVENUE TO LIBERTY-S=T;. Mayor Nee stated that the cost of street paving, curb and gutter will be $10.03 per front foot to properties fronting on East River Road and $6.73 per front foot to properties on side streets connecting to East River Road East Service Drive. He stated that construction of the improvement includes construction • of a storm sever at an estimated cost of $3.06 per hundred square feet. 0 TW COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/15/65 PAGE 28 A visitor to the Council Meeting stated that he lives at 79th Avenue Northeast on East River Road, and he sees no reason for having a service drive along East River Road. He stated that he does not believe there was a petition for this improvement, that be owns four lots on East River Road and is the only property owner with a driveway entering onto East River Road. Mayor Nee stated that a petition was given to the City for the improvement of East River Road East Service Drive signed by 30% of the property owners. Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer why it was proposed to construct a service drive *long this part of East River Road. The City Engineer answered that a petition vas received last year for construction of this portion of the service drive, and that construction will allow the City to close one access road to East River Road. The City Manager stated that the Safety committee recommanded- construction of a service drive on East River Road in order to reduce the number of driveways entering onto East River Road. Be stated that when traffic is heavy on East River Road, it will be difficult for automobile drivers to back auto East River Road. He stated that a service drive would allow property owners to back out of their driveways easily, and all such traffic would be funnelled to one intersection onto East River Road. Mayor Nee stated that he is persuaded construction of this improvement should be removed from the street improvement project. councilman Wright stated that construction of East River Road East Service Drive was proposed for safety reasons -to reduce the number of driveways entering onto East River Road. He stated that these driveways are a hazard to traffic. • RUTH STREET - LIBERTY SMMT TO RUTS CMCW: Mayor Nee stated that the estimated cost of construction of the street improvement project an Ruth Street was $10.70 per front foot for property owners in Block 10 of Springbrook Park and $3.89 per front foot for lots in Block It and Block 14 of Sparingbrook Park. Mr. Herold Schroeder stated that he favors construction of Ruth Street. Be stated that the Christians' residence suffered damage from a washout of the street earlier in the year and he believes construction of Ruth Street is necessary. Mayor Nee asked the City Engineer whether it is possible to install sufficient storm sewer drainage for Ruth Street without building the rest of the storm sewer system. The City Engineer answered that this was not possible, and that it would be necessary to drain both Ely Street and Ruth Street. Mayor Noe asked whether anyone is opposed to construction of Ruth Street. Four visitors at the Council luting stated that they favored the construction of Ruth Street and none opposed this construction. Mayor Nee stated that the estimated cost is $2.14 per foot for construction of a blacktop alley and $4.40 per foot for construction of a concrete alley. Councilman Wright stated that this was discussed by the Council at a previous • meeting. He stated that he does not believe construction of the alley would set a precedent for construction of all the other alleys in the City of Pridley, but he stated that he believes it would be worthwhile to build this alley as a pilot project to determine whether construction of the alley was worthwhile. He stated that tle City Eagiae� strongly recommends construction of a concrete 0 THE COUNCIL MINUTES OP 11/15/65 PAGE 29 alley rather than an asphalt alley based on information concerning the maintenance of asphalt alleys in the rest of the country. He stated that construction of an asphalt alley without curbs and firm edges will generally cause an asphalt alley to break up and the cost of maintaining such an alley is not worth the cost of constructing it. Visitors stated that they favor construction of an asphalt alley rather than a concrete alley since the alley will have very little traffic. Mayor Nee stated that the choice is strictly up to the property owners, but the City Engineer recommends construction of a concrete alley. Another visitor asked whether the alley would be built in a straight line or whether it would offset around existing garages and telephone poles. Council- man Wright stated that the right of may is a straight line in the alley. The City Engineer stated that the alley is a 120 right of way and paving will be 10 feet wide. A visitor asked whether assessments for construction of the alley could be spread. Mayor Nee answered that construction of an asphalt alley might be spread over a 10 year period. Councilman Wright stated that the proposal does not contain plans for drainage. He explained that it would be expensive to drain the alley to the street, and the alley would have to drain to the side properties. A visitor suggested that the alley be made to drain down the middle and that the alley be cupped rather than crowned. Councilman Wright stated that cupping the alley would create a depression in the alley, and the water would stand in it ruining the pavement. He stated that the City Engineer considered raising the eleva- tion of the depression in the alley. He stated that there are garages along the alley and filling the low spot to provide drainage with a cupped construction requires that the alley be raised one foot above the level of some of the garages built along the alley. He stated that these garages are built too near the alley to enable the property owners to drive from their garages onto the alley if the alley were raised this one foot. He stated that the alley will be higher than back yards along the alley, if the alloy is raised one foot, and will trap water in the yards. Be stated that in order to drain the alley onto 53rd Avenue Northeast, it would be necessary to raise the construction of the alley one font. Mayor New stated that the only other alternative is bu#ldig the alley with a crown. Councilman Wright stated that another consideration is whether the unpaved road on the north end of the alley should be paved for � block. Councilman Sheridan stated that property owners have figures of the construction costs now and should discuss them with their neighbors, circulate a petition among the neighbors and bring it to the City. Mayor Nee asked the property owners present whether they wished to have construction of the alley with these costs. The property owners answered, "Yes." No one opposed this con- struction. • Mayor Nee declared the Public Hearing for Street Improvement Project #1966 -1 closed. �. A�W';.7_� QV YM §fflNENT - ST. 1966 -2; The City Manager read the Notice of Hearing. THS Co iNCt L MINUTSS CW 11/15165 PAGE 30 . Msyor Nee said that as a general rule, the assessments levied against residential property for the cost of construction of State Aid Streets are the serves as the costs of building ordinary residential streets and the remaining costs are paid from State Funds. Be said that whose the road abuts commercial and industrial property the costs of building an industrial road are assessed against these properties. WEST MOM %A= ,CUM DR= TO BAM AVBI� -.- Mayo= Nee stated that the City proposes to build a 9 ton, MSAS road from Carol Drive on West Monte Lake Drive to Rice Creek Road at the intersection with old Central Avenue. Mayor Nee stated that the Council knows that some property owners in the neighborhood of St. Philip's Lutheran Church, as well as the church, favor this construction, and other property owners think the existing construction is adequate. He said the possibility exists that property owners along the existing street would receive credit of $1.50 per front foot for the existing construction. It is estimated that now construction costs of $8.47 per front foot will be assessed against residential property. Mayor Nee stated that West Moore Lake Drive is intended to be part of a system of through streets to provide necessary thoroughfares In the City. Councilman Wrigbt stated that construction of this street will provide a traffic route between 4 schools. Mc. Don Savelkoul stated that property owners on West Moore Lake Drive purchased their homes in this area because it was a quiet residential • neigbborhood without through streets. Be stated that West Moore Lake Drive is not intended to be a 9 ton toad as it is aver built and although the existing road is not as good as it night be due to construction of sewer and water services to serve an area to the southwest, the residents are satisfied with the road. Be stated that heavy traffic is a hazard to school children, and the chuck holes is the road slow doers the traffic asking it safer to drive. Be stated that the property owners object to making a contribution to a system of through streets and object to this construction. Mayer Nee asked if any of the visitors favored or opposed the construction of West Moore Lake Drive to WAS standards. Eleven visitors opposed the construction and none favored it. WEST NOW LAEB DRIVE- gQ= a= To TRUNK BIGMrJAY 465 s Fir. Virgil Herrick stated that he was representing St. Phillips Church, and that a petition has been circulated favoring construction of West PATS Lake Drive from Baker to TOH. #r65, that while St. Phillips Lutheran Church does not care whether this construction, is made to MSAS standards or not, St. Phillips Lutheran Church favors early construction of a new street in order that the future level of the road may be known and the church can plan construction of a parking lot with drainage from the parking lot. Mayor Nee asked whether anyone also wished to comment on construction of this improvement. There were no other ,statements for or against the improvement. RICE CBEEK ROAD - T.H. #65 TO CSNTBAL AVEM: • Mayor Nee stated that the cost of this construction will be approximately $18.79 per front foot 00 each aide of the road. Be stated that the total cost TIE COUNCIL MINUTES CF 11/15/65 PAGE 31 • of the construction would be assessed against property owned by Mr. Saliterman In the amount of approximately $55,294. Mr. Saliterman stated that he would favor construction of this road if West Moore Lake Drive is extended from T.H. #65 to Carol Avenue at MSAS standards. He stated that construction of the road from T.H. #65 to Rice Creek Road would not accomplish a great deal unless a crossover is built at T.H. #65 and an WAS road constructed to Carol Drive on Vast wee Lake Drive. Councilmn Sheridan stated that without a crossover at T.H. #65, the Council would not contesssplate construction of the street. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Saliterman if the City gets the crossover, whether Mr. Saliterman would favor construction of the road. Mr. Saliterman answered, "Yes3." The objector to the construction of West Moore Lake Drive from Baker to Carol asked whether there will be another Council Hearing to determine whether the City will obtain a crossover of T.,H. #65. Mayor Nee stated that such a hearing is not required, but that it could be arranged. The visitor stated that residents in the area are not aware of the Cityge request for a crossover at T.H. #65 and would probably like to give their views on such a crossover. The City Manager stated that a hearing concerning a crossover of T.H. #65 was held when a hearing was held on the design of a State Aid road system in the City of Fridley. The visitor stated that he was not informed of this hearing. The City Manager answered that it was not necessary for the City to mail notices to everyone in the City for this hearing. He stated that notice of the hearing was published in the legal paper. . The visitor asked whether the construction of this road is made in order to take traffic off Mississippi Street._ Councilman Wright answered, "No." Tine visitor stated that traffic will be worse if a crossover of T.H. #65 is made, and this will increase the safety hazard to children living along West Moore Lake Road. Councilman Wright stated that it is necessary for the City to have a system of State Aid roads, that the City does not expect that these MSAS roads will have a great deal of traffic, but that they will rather act as collector streets for traffic to travel to schools in the City of Fridley. He stated that construction of this MSAS road would provide connections between four schools in the City of Fridley. Councilman Wright stated that the City wished to have a system of roads in the City of Fridley which would make it possible for residents to travel from one part of Fridley to another without using the major highways or freavays in the City. Mayor Nee stated that there will be a traffic load along West lire Lake Drive whether the City improves it to State Aid standards or not. The visitor stated that the traffic load would be reduced if there were no emsaing of T.B. #65. He asked whether construction of a storm sewer is proposed for this street. Maya Nee ansttwared that there are no plans for additional storm sewer systems in this area. Leonard Cochran, 6537 Central Avenue Northeast, asked how far this street will extend straight vest of Rice Creak Road before turning southwest. Councilman Wright answered that the street starts to curve immediately. Leonard Cochran stated that he wants the street to continue west for a greater distance is order to provide more frontage to his property. Councilman Kirkham asked whether the construction costs given for building this part of the road are for building the • road to MSAS standards. Mayor Nee answered, "Yes." THz couNCIL MMMS OF 11/15/65 PAGE 32 . AiiiV0.Y AVENUE - 9Ta WAY iOIMNi ON STMT: Mayor Nee stated that construction of Ashton Avenue to estimated to cost .the residential property owners $4.87 per front foot. He stated that this cost will be spread along 113 the side lot litres of property along Ashton Avenue and 1/2 block along each of the streets intersecting Ashton Avenue. A visitor asked why sewer and water construction was not put into Ashton Avenue before the street was built. The City Engineer answered that there is no need for sewer and water on Ashton-Avenue since connections to properties are made on the main streets rather than on the side streets. A visitor asked why the City should construct this roads Mayor Nee answered that construction of this road to MSAS staasdards will take the truck traffic off the other streets. Mrs, Robert Swanson stated that she owns property along Ashton Avenue and would like to develop this property or sell it. She stated that when she approached the Planning Commission with a request for zoning this property, she was told that sowing her property alone would constitsite spot zoning and she swat get together with the neighboring property owner in order to obtain rezoning of the entire area. She stated that the neighboring property owner was not Interested in rezoning this area. Mrs. Robert Swanson stated that she represents the Fahrendorfs who own property along this land, and she and the Fahrendorfs object to the constructions of Ashton Avenue, Mayor Nee asked whether any of the visitors to the Council Meeting favor construction of Ashton Avenue. None of the visitors favored this construction. • Mayor Nee declared the Public Bearing of Street Improvement Project 1966 -2 closed. ABATE)!�NT OP SEWER AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS -'LOTS 10 AND 11. BLOCK A. Councilman Kirkham stated that he looked over the building site of Mr.'King on Lots 10, 11, 12 and '13, and is convinced that Mr. Ring does not have a building site on Lots 10 and 11. Councilman Sheridan stated that he also looked at this property and agrees that there is not a building site on Late 10 and 11. Councilman Wright stated that he believes the City will have to determine in each case whether a given property is a building site, make it clear to the public that each case must be determined on its merits, and that as ,sassments will not be abated unless it is clearly shown that the property for which a connections charge is made is definitely not a building site. Be stated that he does not believe this sets a precedent detrimental to the interests of the City. Councilman Thompson asked hose it would be possible to apply a formula which would provide an equitable abatement to Kr. Ring. He stated that the charges were made with 75% of the costs assessed against each building site and 25% against the front footage of the property, and many of the assessments have already been paid. Councilman Wright stated that Mr. King has already agreed not to ask for a refund of the assessments which have been paid. He stated that he would suggest that the assessments against Lots 12 and 13 be continued, 'but that the assessments against tots 10 and 11 be abated. Motion by Wright that Lots 10 and 11, Block A in Riverview Heights not be regarded as a building site, and that assessments against the property of Mr. Ring be adjusted accordingly. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. THE COUNCIL MURMS OF 11/15/65 • AWIT10KAL BILL FOR LCCKE PARK CLAN UP - JAYCEES WlED 11 /S /b5) s PAGE 33 Boger Saudau, President of the Junior Chamber of Comerce, was present at the Council Meeting, and asked the Council whether they had any questions con - cerning the itemization of the bill presented to the Council. Councilman Sheridan stated that the Jaycees put the City in an odd position. He stated that generally when the City lets a contract, it is awarded for a given amount of soney. The contractor completes the work and is paid. The City treated the Jaycees in this meaner, and now the Jaycees submit an additional bill. Councilman Sheridan stated that the City does not have funds to pay this bill unless it can obtain funds from Federal payments for disaster work. Councilman Sheridan stated that he did not know whether it would be possible for the City to obtain Federal funds to pay this bill. Councilman Kirkham stated that the City had a contract for building the Moore Lake Beachhouse and has posac3 a change order to effect an addition to the contract after the beach house was dedicated. He stated that in a similar fashion, the City could pass a change order to accommodate the Jaycees. Councilman Kirkham said that the Jaycees have done additional work over and above the contract, andhe believes it would only be fair to pass a change order and reimburse them for the additional work. Councilman Thompson stated that originally there was a contract agreement for a specified number of dollars. He stated that the Jaycees did the work properly and he believes that the additional work eras also done properly. Be • asked whether there was an additional grant for the trees and stumps which the Jaycees remtived. The City Manager stated that the City wanted to clean out the area in order to create a larger picnic area in Locke Park. He. stated that he believes this project could be paid with Federal disaster funds, since the work was caused by the tornado. Mr. Sandau stated that the additional work done by the contractor was supervised by the Jaycees. Mayor Nee asked why it was supervised by the Jaycees and not by City employees. The City Manager answered that the Jaycees were doing the cvosk in Locke Park and Mince the Administration believed that Federal funds would cover the pick -up of debris from the tornado, he believed the Jaycees way as well have the responsibility for cleaning up the additional debris and supervising the work of the contractor doing so. The City Manager stated that the City is asking for a supplemental payment for tornado disaster debris funds, and there might be a possibility that the City could add the additional bill of the Jaycees to that amount. Cound lman Kirkham asked the City Manager how soon he would know whether these funds could be reimbursed from Federal disaster payments. The City Manager answered that he mould know in two to four weeks. He stated that obtaining the additional Federal funds would require another inspection by an inspection team after the supplemental request was made. Councilman Kirkham stated that the Jaycees are amateurs and not professional contractors. Be stated that the Jaycees did more work than they contracted, that the work the .Jaycees do benefits the City in that it develops the park • property for all of the City, and the payment made to the Jaycees is expended in other public projects also of benefit to the City. THE COUNCIL. MINUTES OF 11/15/65 PAGE 34 • Mayor Nee asked whether the City requested the Jaycees to do this additional work. Mr. Sandau stated that the parks department asked them to perform the additional work. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Sandau whether this request of the Parka Department expanded upon the worse done by the Jaycees under the original contract. Mrs. Sandau answered, 01Yes." The City Mmgeager rotated that. this is the first disaster project which the City has handled. He stated that the City has never before required Federal funds for disaster work, and does not know all the details and red tape required to obtain these Federal funds. He stated that he did not know whether this additional work would be covered by Federal funds or not, and he would have to talk to the Adjutant Generale office to find out whether it would be possible to get these supplements approved. Mayor Nee asked Paul Brown whether he had anything to do with the additional 'cork done by the Jaycees. Paul Brown stated that Item A as given in the Jaycees supplemental report was in the contract. Councilmen Wright asked whether only item A was in the contract. Mr. Sandau stated that item A was in the contract, but not all of item A was in the contract. Councilman Wright asked whether item B through E then were not the additional work, but were In the contract. Mr. Sandau answered, "Yes." Councilman Kirkham asked Mir. Sandau whether the contract called for cutting out the stumps and whether the Jaycees removed them. Mr. Sandau aar"eered that the Jaycees removed the stumps in the picnic area. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Sandau whether it was - correct then, that before performing work listed in items A through E, the Jaycees should have obtained a change order, but the additional bill only covers the additional cost in item A. Roger Sandau answered that this • is correct. Paul Brown stated that the Jaycees took these logs out of the area and cut them into chips. Be stated that 80 loads of chips were taken out of the area, over the ridge, and put in crevices, caused by erosion, to fill these crevices. He stated that trucks hired by the Jaycees did this work. Paul Brown stated that he believers this teas part of the disaster cleanup and would be covered by these funds. He stated that the City Mould have to hire a truck to do this same work if the City were to do it instead of the Jaycees. Councilman Wright asked Paul Brown whether he gave his verbal okay to the Jaycees to do this work. Paul Brown answered, "Yes." Councilman Wright asked Paul Brown what discussion he had with the Jaycees to reimburse them for doing the extra work and paying the contractor °s costs. Paul Brown said that there was no discussion of this item. Councilman Wright asked Roger Sandau whether this was correct. Mr. Sandau answered, "Yes." The City Manager stated that it was a shorter haul to dui this debris into the.crevises in Locke Park than it was to haul it to a dump and get rid of it. Paul Brown stated that officials from the Forsstry Departsmnt' recommended that the.. City -use chips to fill the crevices, and stated that the Jaycees made a log bed in the crevices, put in the chips and put dirt on top to prevent erosion. Paul Brown stated that more Nark needs to be done to prevent further erosion in other places in Locke Park. He stated that he relieves the Jaycees did a fine job. Harold Calender, a member of the Jaycees; stated that be believes the erosion resulted from rains accompanying the tornado. • Councilman Wright stated that he recognizes that the Jaycees is an amateur organization and that the Jaycees have contributed a great deal to the City. He stated, however, that he not criticise the Jaycees for not handling the THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/15/65 PAGE 35 . contract in the same way a professional contractor would do it. He stated that -if the Jaycees were going to enter bids and ask for a contract, they should handle their affairs so that it is not necessary for them to come with hat in hand to the City for additional funds. Mr. Sandau stated that the Jaycees area citisens of Fridley and want to help the City build a good park. He said that they were not concerned at the time they carried out this extra work with receiving extra paymnt for the same. Councilman Wright stated that the City follove an orderly procedure in dealing with contractors, and would like to have done the same with the Jaycees. Councilman Wright stated that he believes the Jaycees were given rights to the firewood. He asked hoar much money the Jaycees made from the sale of the firewood. Mr. Sandau answered that the Jaycees have mold $5 worth of firewood. He stated that people do not want to buy the firewood until it is put In a condition such that it is immediately useable; namely, the logs cut up and the wood split. Councilman Wright stated that if the Jaycees were to put the firewood into saleable condition, they would have an income from the firewood. Mrs Sandau answered that it is difficult to gp lit this wood before it is dry, and also it is difficult to sell the wood before it is dry. Mayor Nee stated that the Public Examiner will be in the City of Fridley ,shortly and will be looking at the uses of funds by non- public agencies, and that he would not like to see a bill for work that ahould have been done under a change order, done without proper authorization by the City Council. He stated, however, that as long as a member of the Administration directed the • Jaycees or allowed the Jaycees to do this extra work, the City should accept responsibility for it. Be stated that he believes the change order should be brought before the Council, with the proper documentation, in order to bring everything into legal form for the Public Examiner. Councilman Thompson asked hou, the City will pay for the change order if the Federal Government does not approve the application for additional funds. The City Manager stated that he believes it would be possible to find the funds to pay for the change order somewhere. Motion by Kirkham to direct the City Administration to prepare a Change Order encompassing the additional work performed by the Junior Chamber of Commerce In Locke Park;, instruct the City Manager to attempt to obtain Federal reimbursement for the costs of the change order and direct the Administration to pay the bill presented by the Junior Chamber of Commerce. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice w te, there being no nays, the motion carried unsaimoual y: AWARDING OF BIDS - SS #12 LTQLBD _14L15/65) : The City Manager state;i that he talked to the City Manager of Columbia Heights and the City Manager of Columbia Heights told him that he was going to try to deliver the documents before a special eating on November 17, 1965. He suggested that the Council establish a special meeting for November 17, 1965 for this purpose. Notion by Kirkham to table consideration of awarding bids for construction project #12 to a special Council meeting to be held an November 17, 1965 at is 9:00 P.N. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. THE COUNCIL MVnrfE3 OF 11/15/65 PAGE 36 AC Is -- WITH CCLUHBIA HEIGHTS AND M®�SS #12; Notion by Kirkham to table consideration of the agreements with Columbia Heights and the Minnesota Highway Department for construction of storm sever project #12 to the special Council Meeting of November 17, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no mays, the motion carried unanimously. SIGN PERMIT - BURGER KINGe The City Manager states' that he had not received any additional information concerning the sign permit application of Burger King Company. He stated that the Council asked Burger King to bring in an application for construction of a smaller sign, but Burger King has not submitted any additional information concerning their sign application since that time. Notion by Sheridan to table consideration of the application of Burger King Company for a sign permit until such time as the City receives additional information concerning the sign permit application of Burger King Company. Seconded by 3hompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PBIDIEY HOUSING AND REDEVEWPNMT AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMIZS 3, 1965= Notion by Wright to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting of November 3, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan. • Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimouslyo CaMJITICATIONS PUBLIC EXAMnMM STUDY Notion by Sheridan to receive and file the communication from the Public Examiner. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Now The City Manager stated that this proposal was reviewed by the Police Commission, and the Police Commission recommends the proposal. He stated that the changes were planned for several years as recommended by the Chief of Police and he would ask the Council to put the change into effect. Councilman Sheridan asked how the dispatchers are employed. The City Manager stated that the dispatchers are temporary employees, paid 1/2 from the Fire Department budget and 112 from the Police Department budget. Mayor Nee asked her it would be possible to replace three dispatchers with two policemen -and obtain more dispatching work. Councilman Kirkham anmmred that the dispatchers work part time. The City Manager stated that the plan is to have the secretary of the police department continue to serve se daytime dispatcher, andiave the other policemen on at night. He statect that in this way there would be additional trained policemen aim dispatchers on the job able to do the job of police. dispatching better. • Robert Hughes was preaent at the Council Meeting representing the volunteer firemen. He stated that the volunteer firemen quurstioned why the dispatchers should be policemen and not firemen. The City Manager answered that 99 -9/10% of the dtapetchers work is rolice vork rnt!�?r thm work for the Fire Department. Tus COUNCIL MINUTES CF 11/15/65 PAGE 37 • Mr. Hughes stated that Mr. Blosky, who was a member of the Volunteer Fire Department, vas injured during a fire and would wad some fors of employment„ ik stated that be would qualify as dispatcher, but he would not be qualified to act as a policemen. He stated that Mr. Blonsky was interested in having this position, but that he would not qualify under the age limit of the Police Department since he is 37 and the $lice Department's age limit is 35. He stated that there are two men who could act as dispatchers but they are both above the age limit for recruitment by the Police Department. Mr. Hughes stated, further, that the dispatcher would be working forty hours a week as a dispatcher even though he veto to work the rest of the -time as a policeman. The City Manager stated that the Chief of Police spent considerable time planning this change. He stated that the Chief of Police also found that he =ads a men trained in police work to act as a dispatcher. Councilman Sheridan asked the City Manager whether this memo is complete in all of its fiscal details. He stated that when the budget was discussed he was told that in order to hire two additional policemen, the City must spend closer to $20,000 because of the need to provide additional equipment, uniforms and so on. The City Manager stated that with the addition of $100 for a uniform to the salary of the dispatcher, the dispatchers salary would be $6,012 plus the $100 uniform which would be $6,112 and twice that is $22,224 as given in the memo from the Police Chief. Councilman Sheridan stated that there are additional costs such as retirement payments for the employees, health insurance, and other payments. He stated he believes these should be . added to this figure. The City Manager stated that he could bring in an exact figure. Mayor Nee asked why a police officer would make a better dispatcher. Council- m= Kirkbam answered that a police officer as a dispatcher would have sore authority than a dispatcher would have himself. The City Manager stated that the dispatchers possibly would be rotated with police work in order to maintain training as polices m. The Mayor stated that in that event the policemen would not be specialized dispatchers. Mr. Hughes stated that it would be possible for the City to obtain three dispatchers full time at the cost of $450 per month each, starting wages. He stated these dispatchers could serve as police officers. Mr. Hughes stated also that the .secretary of the Police Department does a good job of dispatching, and he sees no reason why the change should be made. He stated that in the City of gobbinsdals, the dispatcher is a member of the Fire Department and he believes this could also be done in the City of Fridley. The City Manager stated that a part tix a dispatcher is not as dependable as a full time employee. He stated that it is necessary for the dispatchers to sleep at some time during the night, and daring this tinms the City has no dispatcher on duty. He stated that a full time dispatcher would be an asset and a benefit to the City, and the cost would not differ much from those given by the Police Chief. Mayor Nee stated that he believes there is more information concerning this change that could be given to the Council than was presented in the agenda. Motion by Thompson to receive the memo from the Chief of Police, to concur • with the recom wadatiLon of the Police Chief and the City Manager and to hire two additional policemen to act as full time paid dispatchers. Seconded by Kirkham, for purposes of discussion. upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. TEE COUNCIL MINUTES OP 11/15/65 PAGE 38 DUUTY Y RBGUUTIONB s Me. Bad was present at the Council Meting and stated that he is half owner of a home beauty salon and representing four other home beauty salon owners. 8s asked that the letter from.the beauty salons,be read. The Mayor read the letter. Mr. Bad stated that be is half owner of Bud °s House of Beauty. Re stated that he is in business as a professional person, his wife operates the. beauty salon, and he sells products and equipment to beauty salons. He stated that the beauty salon owners are agreed that the Council should have some control of the operation of beauty salons. He stated that these salons are not licensed by the State, even though the State does inspect the salons, to ascertain that'tbeq comply with health requirements. He stated that it could not be necessary for the City to do any additional work other than to grant licenses since the State does make health inspections. Mr. Bud stated that everyone knows the professional shops which are in existence in the City of Fridley. He stated that anyone wishing to start a new beauty salon in the "City of Fridley should be forced to present a petition signed by the neighboring beauty shops and the property owners in the area asking the Council to establish an additional beauty salon. Mr. Bud stated that the Council should know whenever an additional beauty salon to established in the City of Fridley. He stated that the beauty shop operator should be a professional person licensed by the State Health Inspector. He stated that the Council should check the signstures an the petition to make sure the signatures are valid in order that the Council may know how many • beauty shops there are in the City of Fridley. Councilman Wright stated that this matter is similar to the zoning problem that occur when a property owner wants to lease a room is his house. He stated that this proposal could be referred to the Planning Coami.ssion for recommendations such as requirement of a special use permit to set up an additional beauty salon. Mr. Bud stated that when he set up his shop, he was told by the former City Manager, Mr. Madsen, that a boom shop in a residential area was allowed as long as it does not appear to be a shop and does not create a nuisance. go stated that at that time there were one half dozen home shops in the City of Fridley. Mr. Bud stated that he and the other beauty shop operators would be against the Council legislating beauty shops out of existance in the City of Fridley. He stated that he has added a parking lot to his beauty shop in order to make it ware convenient for the patrons. He stated that the primary interest of the beauty shop owners in that the Council does not restrict the operation of the present beauty shops in the City of Fridley. Motion by meson to receive and file the communication from the beauty salon operators. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unaniamely. GIBBSa OP ESCROW 'he City Manager stated that this should have been called a cash bond and not an escrow. He said that since this money was put in escrow to require the property owner to install a curbing, he has notified the property owner year by year to construct the curbing, and the property owner has failed to do so. THE COMCIL MUMTFS OF 11115/65 PAGE 39 • Councilman Sheridan asked the City Engineer whether the State Highway Deport- ment will construct curb and gutter on the east side of University Avenue East Service Drive. The City Engineer stated that the Minnesota Highway Department will construct curb on both sides of the East Service Drive, and the City will assess the property owners for part of the cost. Councilman Wright stated that, since the property owner will be assessed for part of the cost, this money should remain in escrow for that assessment. Motion by Wright to receive and file the con amication from Mr. Gibbs and direct the Administration to inform the property owners that the escrow will be held for the purpose of future assessments for construction of curb and gutter. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the nation carried unanimously. MiE OTA HIGHRAY DEPARTHM9 14ATTERHMN DRIVE: Notion by Sheridan to receive and file the communication from the Minnesota Highway Department concerning construction of Matterhorn Dr *ve. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. CITY BNGZIM —M: MAINTENANCE BONIDIVEBS,EDCE SJAYi: notion by Wright to concur with the recommendation of the City Engineer and release the maintenance bond of Street Project #1962 -2B to Crows Sidewalk. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BATCH AND ERiCR80N SCHOM NG POOL: Councilman Sheridan asked why an unmetered water main is being installed to serve the s�hool swimming pool. The City Engineer stated that the cost for the aster comae to more than $1200 and the water main will only be used once or twice mach year to fill the swimming pool. He stated that the City knows the site of the swimming pool, and the City could charge the school district for the water needed to fill the swimming pool once each year. Mayor Nee stated that he believes the City should put a lock on the gate valve at the on- metered water main, and direct the Department of Public Works to unlock the valve when the school district needs to change the water in the swimming pools so the City will know when the school district is using the un- metered water and the approximate quantities of water used each period. Notion by Sheridan to receive and file the coemmmication from Patch and Erickson regarding the school swimming pool. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. AtOt CAN PIPE SEBVICBBL SEWER SURVEY: �1� ./ /1.��1r Mr. Leland Gottstein was present representing American Pipe Survey Company and stated that American Pipe has completed a survey of the sanitary sewer systems in the City of Fridley and found that 507. of the sanitary sewer systems will require some kind of repair work. He stated that he submitted a plan for inspection of • the lines prior to performance of this work, and that the estimated cost of the work is $440,000. Mr. Gottstein stated that three weeks ago this plan was THE COUNCIL MINUTES air 11/15/65 PAGE 40 • reviewed at a meeting attended by the Minnesota Director of Public Health, the Federal health Officer, the City Manager, the City Engineer, and the City CoMmIting Engineer. He stated that the following day three inspection teams lifted 450 manholes in the City of Fridley to verify the report of American Pipe Services. He stated that the inspectors determined that the amount of eligible work should be cut 28% from the 507. of the work originally proposed by American Pipe Services and which the Federal inspectors bad accepted prior to the inspection. He state4 that this leaves 17 miles of sewer in the City of Fridley to be cleaned. He said that the inspectors took the position that some of the sewer cleaning work which needs to be done is not eligible for reimbursement under the requirements of the Office of Eimergency Planning. He stated that the inspectors decided that sealing the sanitary sewers and TV inspection of the sanitary "Were is not eligible for reimbursement with CC? funds.- He stated that if sealing does become necessary, then TV inspection may be used to find the exact places where it is necessary to seal the sanitary severs, and the cost then would be borne by the Federal Government. He stated that some of the TV inspection might be conducted by the City, paid by City funds, and the determination made later based upon the use of the TV inspection whether some of these funds are eligible for reimbursement from OEP disaster funds. Mt. Gottstein stated that the Federal Government approved $166,875.65 for sower cleaning work. He stated that two miles of the sanitary sewer system could not be inspected because the lines were full of water. He stated that of these lines he estimated 75% need some kind of repair work. He stated that • the amount of Federal funds authorized could be varied by 10% and without requiring additional inspection or authorization. He stated that this bzi ngs the approved Federal funds to $183,565. COUM ilman Wright asked whether it would be necessary for the City to conduct TV inspection of the lines before getting approval and Federal funds for the sans, Mr. Gottstein stated that surveys show that sand is constantly coming into the sanitary sewers. He stated that it would be possible to inspect these lines in key areas and ask the Office of Emergency Planning for authori- sation to spend funds when it is found that the TV inspection demonstrates that an actual break exists in the City sewers. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Gottstein whether the City would be expected to start this project not knowing whether the City would be reimbursed with Federal funds. Mr. Gottstein answered. "No." Be stated that his proposal is to start cleaning the lines, and that the lines must be cleaned before it will be possible to use TV ;inspection of the lines. Mr. Gottfitein stated that it will be necessary to coordinate the work of his forces with City forces in order to clean the laterals as well as the interceptors. He stated that City forces must clean the laterals, whereas, the American Pipe Services cleans the interceptors, but that it mould do no good to clean one without cleaning the other, and that cleaning one before the other would only push debris from one into the other. Councilmen Wright asked whether it is necessary for the City to spend some funds for TV inspection of the li e : W-- Gottstein answered that he would propose that TV inspection be used only where there io suspected dLaaster related damage. • Ho stated that he expects the Federal Government would authorize spending funds when TV inspection does show actual damage. THE COUNCIL MINUTES CF 11/15/65 PAGE 41 . Ift. Gottstein stated that this work must be dose before April 10th of 1966. Be stated that it can't be done very rapidly in cold weather, and there is not mach time for doing the work. He stated that work should begin immediately. Mr. Gottstein said that it was necessary to re- evaluate the inspection of storm sewers and rewrite the report in order to obtain Federal funds for cleaning storm severe. He stated that the City Engineer found more things in the City sewer systems which should be inspected. Ift. Gottstein stated that further procrastination on the program will cow - licate the work of cleaning the sewers. He stated that it will take 7 to 10 days to have maps made of areas which should be inspected and prepare schedules to coordinate the work of City forces with the work of American Pipe Services. He stated that he would like to have the consulting engineer of the City coordinate work with American Pipe Services and the City forces and insure that the work is acceptable to the Federal OEP such that the City will be eligible to receive Federal funds. Councilman Wright stated that Mr. Gottstein is asking the City to undertake this work without knowing the full cost of the work. The City Manager stated that the contract lim its the amount of work done by Mr. Gottstein to the funds provided by the Federal Government. Councilman Wright stated that the proposal does not say that everything Mr. Gottatein undertakes will be recoverable by Federal funds. He stated that Air. Gottstein has mentioned there will be saw TV inspection which the City will have to do without Federal funds. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Gottstein whether he is convinced that the Federal • Government will approve his use of TV inspection. Mr. Gottstein stated that he believes it would be accepted. Mr. Cottstein stated that the Federal authorities accepted the use of TV inspection in the City of South St. Paul. Councilman Wright stated that the Council could give the Administration the authority to enter into a contract on behalf of the City with American Pipe Services, subject to approval of the Federal Government of funds necessary to undertake this project. The Mayor stated that he would like to have the opinion of the City Attorney on this action. Time City Attorney stated that he drafted the emergency ordinance presented to the Council which allows the City to enter into :a contract with the American Pipe Services. He stated that he did not write the contract with American Pipe Services, but the contract was mritten by the American ripe Services Company. The City Attorney stated that when the Initial survey was made, there were many unknowo in the project including how the project should be carried out. He stated that be does not ucAerstaud the figures in the contract dramm by American Pipe Services, but that apparently the Federal Government hats okayed the figures included in the report of American Pipe Serviced. Motion by Wright to read Ordinance #317 authorizing the expenditure of public funds to restore and repair the sanitary sewer and storm sewer lines as an aftermath of the tornado and flood disasters. Seconded by Sheridan. The Mayor read the Ordinance. The City Attorney stated that the Administration can hold the contract and not • sign it until a final determination has been made by the Federal Government of the funds available The City Engineer stated that the City will need a dump THE COUNCIL MINMS OF 11/15/65 PAGE 42 for the sand brought out of the sanitary sewer. He stated that there is no dump in the City of Fridley. 'Ilse City Attorney asked whether the sand could be dumped in Golden Valley. Councilman Wright asked whether there is a bad odoz, associated with the hand cleaned from the sanitary severs. Mr. Gottstein said there possibly would be. He stated that if the sand is covered with other materials the odor is not bad. The City Engineer asked whether the City is going to enter into this contract. 'The Mayor said, "Yes." The City Engineer stated that he wished to suggest changes in the contract. He stated that he obtained different total prices and different unit work prices with different working arrangements than the contract provides. Mayor Nee asked whether changing the contract would invalidate the ordinance. The City Attorney stated, "No." He stated that he thinks the contract should be studied and arrangements should be made for supervising the work. He stated that the contract was drawn by American Pipe Services, and it may be necessary to make several modifications in the contract to obtain a contract suitable to the City. Mr. Gottstein stated that he knows that there might be some modifications which the City would wish to make in the contract. Motion by Wright to adopt Ordinance #317. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a roll call vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BUILDING PERM - 339 - 57TH PLACE NMTHSAST RICHARD MI1=.0 Mr. Miller stated that he received a permit to rebuild his home to the original, provided the structure was brought up to code. He stated that his ham was only slightly damaged by the tornado, and was not damaged more than 50% of any kind of value. He stated that it is not feasible for him to bring his home up to code. Mr. Miller stated that he has bean waiting since June 10th to obtain a permit to repair his home. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Miller whether he has any definite plans for the hoarse. Mr. rii ller stated that after making his first application for a building permit, the Council referred the application to the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority. He stated that after one month he obtained no satisfaction from the Redevelopment Authority so he was advised to try to get a permit to build several different structures, one of which might fit in with the Redevelopment Authority plans, and let the Council choose which structure he should build. He stated that this permit was not immediately approved either. Councilman Wright stated that he examined the home together with Mr. Miller, and he stated that lie believes the horse is definitely sub-standard. Hs stated that Mr. Miller wants to wait and see how the area developes before putting a good structure on the land. Councilman Wright stated that one half the basement is uneueavated. He stated that the joints are 2xVn located 24" an center, the roof in built of ?=Vs located 24" on center. He ;Mated that the miring is romex stapled to the wooden frame. He stated that the lead -in wire to the house touches against the siding, that there is no pipe for the lead -in wire into the house, and the lead -in wire is frayed. He stated that the house was not condemned before the tornado, nor condemned during inspection following the tornado. He stated that the house could not be rebuilt to sweet any kind of standards without demolishing the whole home. He stated that THS COMCI% MID=$ OF 11/15/65 PAGE 43 • Mr. Miller wished to hold the property until it could be developed for commercial property although it is not zoned as such at the time. Mr. Miller stated that he wished to repaint the home at this time and make a few alterations to relieve some of the hazards which might exist in the home. Coumilman Sheridan asked whether the Inspection Department examined the home. The City Manager answered that he did not know. Councilman Wright stated that the tornado damage to the home was minor. The City Manager stated that the Building Inspector informed him that the home wan not badly damaged but that It should be brought up to code. Councilman Wright stated that there is trash on the land Which could be cleaned up, and an open grease pit which had been covered before the tornado, but the tornado removed the covering. He stated that Mr. Miller was disinclined to clean the property until he known what will happen to it. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Miller whether he rents out the property. Mr. Miller said that he does. He said that he brought sewer and water into the house and remodeled the plumbing to met codes. He stated that the structure doesn't meest �he current code, but he does not believe the building is unsafe since the span of the floor joists is only B €ect. He stated that the floor appears to be level and the walls are plumb. Mayor Use asked Mr. Miller whether he plans to use the home for avhile and then replace it. Mr. Miller stated that he plans to hold the property for a higher use at a later dste. Mayor Nee asked Mir. Miller how mach he plans to invest. Mr. Miller stated that he does not with to invest more than $1,000 at this time. Councilman Kirkham asked Mr. Miller • whether $1,000 is sufficient to restore the house to the condition it was in before the tornado. Mr. Miller said, "Yes." Mr. Miller stated, also, that at the time he repairs the house he will fill in the grease pit and remove an old shed an the property. Councilman Wright stated that the electrical wiring on the house and the structural condition of the house is in bad shape. lie stated that the plumbing is not in such bad shape. Councilman Wright stated that if the Building Inspector will eay that the loading on the house is okay, it might be allright to repair the home, but he believes the Electrical Inspector and the Building inspector should find what repairs are required to make the hoarse safe for use even though the home ie not brought up to code. Councilman Sheridan stated that the home ttould also be brought up to health standards, such as, completing the basement to snake it rodent proof. Councilman Wright stated that he believes Mr. Miller could seal off the basement. Mayer Nee asked Mr. Miller whether he would be willing to fix the wiring hazard. Mr. Miller stated that he believes roimex wilting is acceptable. Councilman Wright stated that he believes it will be necessary for Mr. Miller to fix the wiring. Motion by Wright that the Administration direct the Building Inspector, the Electrical Inapector, and the Health Inspector to make a written report concerning the repairs needed to make this home safe for habitation, but not including repairs needed to bring the house up to code, and present the report to Mr. Miller and the Council. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the rmDtion carried unanimously. CZA�� Motion by Sheridan to approve General and Public Utilities Claims #6594 through #7016 for payment. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. THE COUNCIL MINMS dr 11/15/65 PA(Z 64 • Motion by 8irkbam to approve Liquor Claims #7990 through 98011 for payment. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BSTIMAUS Notion by Sheridan to approve the following Estimates for payment: C. S. McCrossan Company, Inc. Route 2, Box 4322 Oman, M musoti Estimate #5 (Partial) street Improvement Project No. St. 1965 -1 acxording to contract (1965 Menicipsl Program) Estimate #5 (Partial) Street Improvement Project No. St. 1965 -2 according to contract (1965 State `id Program) Comstock &Davis, Iec. Consulting Engineers 14" County Road •'J° Minasapolis, MiUMM"ta 55432 • For the famishing of resident inspection and resident supervision for the staking out of the construction work for the following: $ 17,057.03 $ 249844.90 Estimate #7 - Water Improvement Project No. 34-0 from September 7, 1965 through October 30, 1965 (Crossing T.H. #694 - Johnson Street, 7th Street $ 87.50 Estimate 416 - Sanitary Sewer and Water Im- provemeut :xoject ao. 67 from September 2r-4 1965 through October 30s 1965 (1964 Sanitary _ Se"r mad mater Program) $ 15.00 Estimate #11 - Sanitary Sever and Water Im- provement Project No. 70 from September 27, 1965 through October 309 1965 Otiverview Terrace, south of Miasissippi Place, Lincoln (Ashton) Street, south of Ironton Street; Stir Street, south of T.H. #100) $ 30.00 Estimate #3 - Sanitary Sever, Water and Storm Sever Improvement Project from September 27, 1965 t1krough October 30, 1965 (54th & Innsbruck 5th Addition) Estimate #3 - Storm Sewer Improvement Project • No. 73 from September 27, 1965 through October 30, 1965 (54th Avenue Northeast'. $ 1,971.25 $ 541.50 THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/15/65 PAGE 45 Estimate #8 - Water improvement Project No. • 75-A from September 27, 1965 through October 30, 1965 (Three Additional Drift Wells) $ 114.50 Estimate #6 - Water Improvement Project No. 75-8 from September 27, 1965 through October 30, 1965 (Booster Sation - 63rd Avenue N.B. & T.H. #100). $ 100.00 Industries Services, Inc. 1359 Dean Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota Estimate #1 (Partial) payment to Debris Clean up Contractor for strut cleaning Street clean up to date 35 Curb Miles @ $57.50 $2,012.50 Less 107. Withholding • 201.25 PAYMENT THIS BSTIMATS $1,811.375 Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unsalsously. LIBRARY LEM: Mrs. Miskowic was present at the Council Meeting, and the City Manager asked • Mrs. Miskowic whether it is satisfactory to extend the lease at the same rent as the current lease. Mrs. Miskoaic answered, "Yea." Motion by Sheridan to authorize the Administration to execute the lease with Mr. and Mrs. Miskovic for rental of library space. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. %CB MlIC FOR SHOMOOD LOUNGE t fte City Manager stated that he wished to ask the Council whether they world like to purchase a particular ice machine for the Shorewood Lounge or advertise for bids. Notion by Kirkham that the City advertise for bids for the purchase of as Us machine for the Shorewood Lounge. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BIDS _ FM PICK -UP 7RV= - PARKS s The City Manager described the condition of the two vehicles now owned by the Parks Department. He stated that, whereas, the purchase of a new track was not budgeted, them are sufficient funds In the Parks budget accruing from contracts which the Parity Department was unable to let this year, to purchase a truck. He stated that he assumes the cost of a truck will be between $2500 and $2700. Councilman Wright asked whether the City Manager has considered • the expenditures of Hodne °s planning for site work in Locke Park. The City Manager answered, "Yes." THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/15/65 PAGE 46 Notion by Wright to advertise for bids for the purchase of a three- quarter ton truck in accordance with the specifications presented to the Council. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Kirkham to adopt Resolution #198 -1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. octIMMION CM ATTQRNEY. BTMMIS 1965 -2 PARCEL 6 AND 7, RIEDEL PROPERTYB The City Attorney stated that Mrs. Riedel hired a new attorney who is generally considered an expert in the matter of making appraisals of properties. He s tared that the attorney agreed not to charge the City for 30 feet of the easement necessary for the construction of 7th Street Northeast. He stated that the City already owned a sewer and water easement on this property, the the Riedel °s must dedicate a 30 foot easement for a street when the property is platted, and hence, Mrs. Riedel' attorney did not feel that 30 feet of the easement for 7th Street was worth any additional payment to • the property owner. He stated, however, that the City is taking a 40 foot easement on the property, and the attorney is asking; for payment of the remaining 10 feet of the easement. Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney whether he believes the amount which Mrs. Riedelsa attorney is asking for these parcels is a fair amount. The City Attorney s =tated that the City is taking 10 feet of valuable property which otherwise could contribute to the area needed for a building site. Motion by Wright to authorixe the City Attorney to negotiate with the property owner for the settlement of the claim in the amount of $3500 for the purchase of parcel 6 and up to $3000 for the purchase of parcel 7. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. CITY AT'TWWa PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 2 - ST. #1965 -1s The City 'Attorney stated that the court awarded a payment of $850 on Parcel 2 to Mr. Osborne, that Mr. Osborne originally asked for $3000 or $4000 and Mr. Osborne may appeal the decision. Be stated that the award of $2200 was wade for Parcel 1 since the property owner argued that this land taken behind his 4- plexes was the yard space for the 4- plexes and it will be necessary for his to buy additional land. Councilman Sheridan asked whether purchase of this property would allow the City to put in a street. The City Attorney asked the City Engineer whether the street has been constructed.. The City Engineer answered, "Yes." • Notion by Wright that the City accept the recommendations of the referee a concerning Condemnation Order #'24980 on Parcels 1 and 2, and authorize payment TIM COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/15/65 PACE 47 . of $2200 and $850 on each of these Parcels respectively. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 2MMGATION CM ENGYNESH3 MU _BMK: The City Manager asked the City Engineer what would be the cost of repairing the sewer break. The City Engineer stated the cost would be $4,000, but that he believes the cost would be reimbursed by Federal funds. Councilman Wright asked the City Engineer whether he has taken ibis into account and included it in the estimate made by the Office of Emergency Planning. The City Engineer stated it is possible that funds paid by the Federal Government would *over 2/3 of the cost. He stated that an emergency has occured since the sanitary sewer line has collapsed and it is necessary to provide sanitary sewer service to these properties. Councilman Kirkham stated that he did not know what else the City could do since it is necessary to fix the lines. Motion. by S;.?2eridaa to authorize the Administration to proceed with the Immediate repair of the sanitary sewer line on Able Street between West Moore Lake Drive and Carol Drive. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. CCOMCATION . CITY ENGINEER: REPAIR STREET SIGNS DAMAGED BY TORNADOS The City Engineer stated that the City received approval of Federal funds lu the amount of $5,209.40 for the repair of damage to street signs. The City Manager stated that the City is getting complaints from residents who want street signs replaced. Councilman Kirkham stated that he believes the replacement of the street signs could be considered a matter of health and safety for residents enabling outside Fire Departments to find addresses in the City of Fridley to provide mutual aid. Motion by Wright authorizing the immediate repair of street sign damage done by the tornado for which the City will receive reimbursement from Federal funds. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. JMOR. CHAMBER OF CKA4W E .ONNUAL Bill : Councilman Sheridan stated that a representative of the Jaycees talked to his concerning the Annual Bail to be held by the Junior Chamber of Commerce. He stated that instead of holding this ball in Minneapolis, the Jaycees wished to hold it in Skywood Msll on a Saturday night, and the Jaycees would like to have a one -night permit for the sale of liquor. He stated that he informed the Jaycees that it would be Impossible to obtain a permit to sell liquor for one night, but that it would be possible for them to obtain a permit to sell 3,2 beer, He stated that the Jaycees agreed to sell 3.2 beer and no alcoholic beverages, but would also sell set -ups. He stated that since the Jaycees agreed • to do this, no permit was necessary. THE COUNCIL MINCMS OF 11 /15165 PAGE 48 • THE RESIMCE AT 1275 T.H. #100 UNDER TIM HAZARDOUS BUIWING STATUTE t Councilman Sheridan stated that he wished to have the Administration prepare the necessary resolution and reports such that the City could take action under the Hasardous Building Statute to demolish the structure at 1275 T.A. #100. He stated that the Health inspector has condemed the building, the building needs a basement, it is unoccupied, and there are no windows or doors in the building. The -City Manager stated that he would have the necessary paipers prepared for the Council to take action on this matter. POLICE REPORT ON REDeS CLUBS Councilman Thompson asked whether there would be say further report on Red's Club or any further Council action to be taken concerning Red's Club. Council - nen Kirkham asked why the Council Nan not notified at the time that the Omer had been serving juveniles in Red's Club. The City Manager stated that before the Council could take any action, it would be necessary that the owner be persecuted and be found guilty. He stated that if the owner is found guilty of serving minors, it will be mandatory that his license be revoked. The City Attorney stated that the report does not show that the Police Department has filed any charges against the owner of Red's Club. He stated that he does not have any information that the City Prosecuter is prosecuting charges against Red's Club, either. Notion by Wright to receive the report from the Police Department on Red's . Club and take no further action concerning the same. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ADJO'OR102NTs There being no further business, Mayor Nee declared the Regular Council Heating of November 15, 1965 adjourned at 1.-32 A. X. Respectfully submitted, Bayaend B. Bade Secretary to the Council 0 PAGE 49 ?m AC 9F." K =bery Present: Net, Ydrichwa, Sheridan, ikht Membero Atatnt: Thompson #199 -1965 AUTHORIZING 'YF YAAYM� FRIDUY TO E?7°iEeR I~i TO A. RIMN AGFXZMNT UK AGMV'. X1'4 W11H Lm Vial OF OLLpwM.LA I LGix"TS P►tNt� :s LAT_% of ?,tJN59SOTtt A.N� C�1Fdf.'EI�Ni2dG THE STORi�[ SEWER ,SYSTEM SYSTEM Tom,H. 247 MZO 11NE 45TH AVFNlfY OUTF&IW„AAD 5�► �„ MaticAi by Wright, seconded by Sheridan, that Resolution #199 -1965 be passed and adopted. Upon a roll call votat! tho" voting aye: "Nee, Kirkhase, She;;idan, 'WrIght, nays-, nova. Mayor teen declared the motion carried. Motion by Sheridan, seccstded by Kirkham, Co refer those two agreements to the Aeaainistraq,tion for reraromandation. ijrpan i - roicaa vote, there being tro mays, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. Wa! ?ING OF BIDS- SOk2�, Motion by Sheridan, seconded by Wright, to award the bid for project SS#12 to Lsaaetti and Sans, 2560 North Cletesland Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55113, in the sum of $966,830.00, subject to they Adminiatration obtaining written &pprovaml from the Hizanesotat Higbway Department and Columbia Heights of the final plans and ,specifications, and of this aaarard. U'paan a roll call vote, those voting aye: Not, Kix'khm. Sherf.daeaan., Wright, nays; none. Mayor Nee daclareed the motion carried. PAQd Motion by Wright, seconded by Kirkham, to receive the report by Comstock and Davis, dated November 5, 19658 concerning possible needs of the City of Fridley to connect to the N.S.S.S.D. lines. upmi a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Nee detlacred the motion carried. Mayor Nee explained that the purpose of this ordinance is to provide for connecting area 3 of the City of Fridley, to delineated in the report by Comstock and Travis of November 5, 1965, with the North Suburban Sanitary Suer Diastri.+ct e$at %v aOL trunk line north of Rico Creek. Motion by Wright, seconded by Sheridan, tbmt In 'light of the a nergaency condition specified thersiu, the! Couicil xdkipt this emergency Abdinarancea #319 authorising the i eiiaete cor.st.i -,uc.tiear+ of a sanJt:s -y aarvnr lime tc cannect with the suer PAGE 50 Page I - speniail Couce.eil Meeting - Novelzber 7: 196fi • liege of the North Suburban Sanitary Sews District. Upon a roll call vote, theee voting eye: Nee, Kirkhaa, Sheridan, Wright, nay: none. Mayor Nee dectarad the motion carried„ UgONSID ZION OF I!ll@M ORDINANCE #317: Motion by Kirkham, seconded by Sheridan, to reconsider emergency ordinance #317. Upon a voice vote, there being no rays, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. Motion by Wright, seconded by Kirkham, to table emergency ordinsae*Mz? until a special meeting is called by Mayor. Nee or until the Regulsr'1*Mtiag of December 6, 1965. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor live declared the motion carried. Thera being no further business, Mayor pee declared the meeting adjourned at W2 P.M. Respectfully submitted, &4.e6v: • Earl P. Wagner Acting Secretary to the Council r� U PAGE 51 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1965 The Meeting was called to order at SY15 P.M. by Mayor Nee. Mayor Nee stated that there were three items to be added to this special muting for which there had been no wrtxtten notice, the items being: Consideration of a Resolution by the Fridley City Council concerning the City °s responsibility for cooperation with Columbia Heights on a Sullivan Lake Outfall Project, consideration of firm quotations by contractors to connect area 3 of the City of Fridley to the North Suburban Sanitary Sewer Districtes east /vest trunk line north of Rice Creek, and a meeting with some members of the Hospital Board relative to possible waiver of certain fire protection requirements for Unity Hospital. Mayor Nee stated that answering present to the roll call would indicate Waiving of the twelve hour written special meeting notice for the three added items. ROLL CALL Members answering present at roll call: Nee, Kirkham, Sheridan, Thompson, Wright. Members Absent: None. Notion by Thompson;, seconded by Sheridan, to adopt and pass Resolution #200 -1%5. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. Councilman 'Sheridan opened the sealed quotations, and read same asfvllo as I. Randall- Berglin/Y.D. Chapman Construction Company, $7,498. 2. Randall Brothers, $79800. 3. Sandstrom and Rafter, Inc., $7,250. 4. Lemetti and Sons, Inc., $6,975. 5. Petrowske and Ross Company, $7,350. RWMWUON OF ORD11UNC6 #319: Motion by Wright, seconded by Kirkham, to reconsider Ordinance #319. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. CONSIDiBA� ON OF ArBODING ORDINANCE � #319: .r.rr.r4.r �. ■ .r��r.�� .�- Motion by Wright, seconded by Kirkham, to amend Ordinance #319 to increase the ceiling in Section 3 of Ordinance #319 from $5000 to $8000. Upon a voice • vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. SPECS COUNCIL MINUTES OF 11/22/65 - PAGE 2 PAGE 52 VOTE ON AMENDED ORDINANCE #319: • Motion by Wri gh t , seconded by Kirkham, that Osrdiaazwce #319, as amended, be passed. Upon a roll call vote, those voting aye; Nee, Kirkham, Thompson, Wright and Sheridan. Nays; None. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. Motion by Kirkham, seconded by Sheridan, to ,award a contract for construction of a connection between. City of Fridley Area 3 and the N.S.S.S.D. trunk line to Lemetti and Sons at their price of $6,975. Upon a voice vote, there being ad nays, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. CONSIDERATION OF SPECUL ZONING CbASSIFICATION FOR FLOOD PLAIN: Mayor Nee stated that he had invited the Planning Commission members and granted the Council to consider what the approach would be to handling the flood plain, since there probably will be requests for permits or there will be houses sold in the near future within this flood plain area. Mr. Bergman of the Planning Commission stated that there should probably be some soning classifications to prevent increasing the problem of flooded out homes. Mr. Myers from the Fridley dousing and Redevelopment Authority pointed out that Section 7,008 of the 1964 Uniform Building Code provides for elevations to protect the Dome against health and safety hazards soch as would be present at flood time. This section is not in the 1961 Uniform Code used by the City of . Fridley.. 7were was no action taken on this item. 0 CONSIDERATION OF NEED FOIt A UNIFORM HOUSING CODE.- Mayor Nee stated that he had asked Mr. Myers, who in in the structural engineering field, to discuss the housing code with the Council and Planning Commission. Mrs Myers stated that architects deal more with the housing code than engineers do, but he did bwo quite a bit of contact with housing codes. Be stated that the best building code, he feels, is the Uniform Building Code which is used by the City of Fridley. He wtated that a building code deals with the technicalities of construction and a housing code deals with residences concerning ventilation, ingress, egress and other health matters, and is designed to prevent blighting influences. There was a great deal of discaision relative to various sections in the Housing Code and its difference from the Building Code. The Planning Commission members stated that they were planning to discuss it on December 16th and probably would report to the Council at its meeting on December 20th. The Council decided to place the ordinance adopting the Uniform Housing Code on its December 6th agenda for possible acceptance on First Reading with possible Second Reading to depend upon further istudy by the Council and the Planning Commission. A spokesaen for the Hoopital Board ambers stated that. hose bosses in the wells, SPECIAL. COUNCIL MINUTES OLT 11%22/65 - PACE 3 PAGE 53 • unless checked frequently, usually and up with rotted hose at the time itss needed, and also, that someone at the time of a small fire could turn on the hose isbproperly and direct high pressure water at patients in beds and not actually accomplish putting out the fire. Having sprinklers in the basement storage area would coat approximately $12,000, and the Hospital Board and the Architect do not feet that the sprinklers are necessary, and that the State Fire Marshall and the State Department of Health do not require sprinklers, only the City Building Code requires the sprinklers and also the hose boxes. He advised that there would be someone on duty 24 hours a day in the storage area so that any potential fire could be spotted immediately, either by the person on duty or by sensor system that is built Into the hospital. and that thence would be plenty of fire extinguishers available. Motion by Wright, seconded by Kirkham, to grant a waiver to the North Suburban Hospital District For Unity Hospital in two respects: 1. Building Code requirement requiring hose and horse cabinets, the hose connection, however, to be required. 2. Building Code requirement on installing of an automatic sprinkler system in basement areas of storage and work room. Waivers to be granted on those two factors only. Upon a voice vote, there being no trays, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. Councilmen Sheridan advised that the two local firms that do this kind of work will provide firs quotations on December 1, 1965 for consideration by the Council on December 6th. There was no action on this matter pending receipt of the quotations. JT, I966, -1 AIM 87. 1966-2 STMT PROGRAM-. The Council discussed the various street projects upon which a Public Hearing was held on November 15, 1965, and advised the City Mmnager'which streets should be included in the resolution ordering the improvement for ST. 1966 -1. The Council decided to resit upon a report from the Planning Consultant and also from the Minnesota Higbvay Department before deciding upon the.ST. 1966 -2 progrmv There being no further business, Mayor Nee declared the meeting adjourned at 10 :59 P.M. Respectfully submitted, &Il'e, 8arl P. Vageer Acting Secretary to the Council RESOLUTION NO. 200 -1965 A RESOLUTION DETERMINING MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES WITH THE CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FOR JOINT CONSTRUCTION AND'MAINTENANCE OF A SULLIVAN LAKE STORM .SEWER OUTFALL. WHEREAS, studies have been in progress for a number of years between the City of Columbia Heights and the City of Fridley con- cerning the collection of storm waters that run into Sullivan Lake in the City of Columbia Heights, and WHEREAS, it appears that there are mutual responsibilities to each of the cities for the construction, maintenance, and repair of an outfall line from Sullivan Lake into storm sewer facilities of the City of Fridley, and WHEREAS, the City of Columbia Heights has prepared a proposed agreement delineating the respective responsibilities of the two cities, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the • City of Fridley: 1. That the City of Fridley recognize its responsibility for storm waters from the City of Fridley that run into the Sullivan Lake drainage area and for an outlet from Sullivan Lake drainage area into the storm sewer system of the City of Fridley. 2. That the proposed agreement submitted by the City of Columbia _ Heights be referred to the City Administration for study. 3. That the Consulting Engineers of the City of Fridley, namely Comstock & Davis, Inc., be authorized and directed to review the suggested shares of responsibilities and report the same to the City Council. • PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1965 BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. ATTEST: Marvin C. Brunsell, CITY CLERK William J. Nee, MAYOR X15 • ORDINANCE # AN FStD"" By THE CITY OF n1DT ZY TO AUNT A FRANCHISE TO THE AMERICAN OIL COWANY TO USE CERTAIN DESIGNATED STREETS AND PROVIDING CONDITIONS FOR SAID USE. THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOSS CRDAIN: SECTION 1. 69.01 There ie hereby granted to the American Oil Coaq=y, a Maryland Corporation, its successors and assigns, for a period extending to December 1, 1990, fro® and after the acceptance of this Ordiumce by the American Oil Campainy, and,subject to the terns and Conditions herein stated, the right to lay and construct one Pipeline across and through the City of Fridley, Anoka County, • Mirnosota, for the purpose of transporting petroleum products, along and underneath the surface of the public streets known as 53rd Avenue Northeast (easterly of 3rd Street Northeast) and 3rd Street Northeast (between 49th Avenue Northeast and 53rd Avenue Northeast) all within the corporate boundaries of the City of Fridley. SECTION 2, 69.02 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns in performing the work shall keep the streets open to traffic at all times, and as'soon as practical after laying, repairing, and constructing said pipeline shall restore the streets to a condition equal or better than that existing before the commencement of the des- cribed work. SECS 3, 69.03 The Company, its successors, grantees and assigns, shall lay, construct, operate,repair, and maintain said pipeline so as not . 1 ORDItiUM # PAGE 2 to interfere with the natural drainage of the streets and so as not to interfere with the construction or maintenance of said streets; and said pipeline shall be laid at such depth beneath the surface so as not to interfere with public travel. SECTIOK 4. 69.04 The Cavpany, its successors, grantees and assigns, shall lay, construct, operate, repair, and maintain said pipeline so as not to interfere with private entrances to land now abutting on said streets. SICTXQN 5. 69.05 The Cavaay, its successors, grantees and assigns, shall pay All doges to the o wrs of property abutting on the public streets which such owners may sustain by reason of the laying, repair or maintsizaaeeof said pipeline. SZMON 6. 69.06 The C wpany, its successorrs, grantees and assigns, shall ass=e all risks and liabilities for all accidents and damages that may accrue to persons or property on account of the laying, maintainiaag, repairing, and operating said pipeline, and by the acceptance hereof, agrees to indemify and save harmless the City of Fridley.fron any and all liaibilities, damages or judg- ments, including attorneys' fees and. court costs in connection with the aforesaid. SECTION 7. 69.07 Said pipeline shall be located and constructed to the satisfac- tion of the City Council ad said City and should construction Md operation of the•strreets require any alteration or change • of location of the pipelirL4, such alteration or change of locatior shall be wade by the . "many, its successors, grantees acid tss:gas, at its eapeasa upon writrer request from the City G�uncil. OEDIXA= # PAGE 3 ADOPTED BY TBE CITY COUIRCIL OF THE CITY OF nIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1965. ATTESTS Clerk Rearing Date: November 1. 196S • Publication of Eearingt 19%;4 lot Meadine ; .L 29- 12 *1 20d It MtM *2 Publication: Acceptance by Coy: William J. Nee, mayor *- Publication of hearing notice not leas than 20 days prior to hearing. *1- May be on data the hearing is ordered. *2- Must be at least 20 days after public hearing aad within 60 days after public hearing. • u� h � � 1 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT Permit No. Location Satellite Lane & University Ave. N. E. Fridley, Minn., Oct.. 1 1965 FRIDLEY INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specified, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rulings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and representations stated in this application are true and correct. Owner Burger King Restaurant Kind of Building Used as Restaurant Work to be completed about May - Spring 1966 Estimated Cost $ DESCRIPTION flow installed: Pylon sign 210 sq. ft. Dimensions: Length 201 Height 28'4" Thickness 18" Distance from Sidewalk Roof Constructed of:_ Iron, x , Wood Illuminated: Yes, Neon Wiring.Application No. i �I i • n U ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF LIFE, LIMB, HEALTH, PROPERTY, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND THE OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS OF RESIDENTIAL BUILD- INGS AND PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF AND TO BE KNOWN AS THE "HOUSING CODE" AND DESIGNATED AS CHAPTER 51 OF THE CITY CODE OF FRIDLEY. The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Section 51.01. In order to provide minimum requirements for the protection of life, limb, health, property, safety, and welfare of the general public and the owners and occupants of residential buildings,:-.there is hereby established a Housing Code for the City of Fridley and is desig- nated as Chapter 51 of the Fridley City Code. Section 51.02. Uniform Code by Reference. That subject to such exceptions, modifications and changes as noted herein, the 1964 Edition . of the Uniform Housing Code published by the International Conference of Building Officials is hereby adopted by reference and established as the Housing Code of the City of Fridley., Section 51.03. Repeal of Existing Code. Any code or regulation heretofore in effect in the City of Fridley and any provision thereof which is contrary to or inconsistent with the provisions of said Housing Code and the exceptions, modifications and changes as noted herein, is of no further force and effect immediately upon the effective date of this chapter, and the same is repealed. Section 51.04.' Exceptions. The following exceptions, modifica- tions and changes in the provisions of said Uniform Housing Code are made with respect to said Code and shall be in force in the City of Fridley: (a) The Planning Commission of the City of Fridley, as pro - vided for in chapter 40 of the Fridley City Code shall constitute the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board as provided for in Section H -203 of said Uniform Housing Code.' (b) The penalty for the violation of this chapter shall be the penalties provided in Chapter 105 of the Fridley City Code and not the penalties set forth in Section H -204 of said Uniform Housing Code. (c) Building Official. The City Manager is hereby designated as the Building Official as provided for in the said Uni- form Housing Code. The City Manager is authorized to designate one or more of the officials or employees of the city as Deputies. t (d) Multiple Dwellings Registration. This Chapter shall not be construed to repeal any provision of Chapter 49 of the Fridley City Code concerning Multiple Dwellings. (e) Dangerous Buildings. This chapter shall not be construed to repeal any provision of Chapter 50 of the Fridley City Code concerning Dangerous Buildings. Any provision in this chapter dealing with rights and remedies for unsafe, t dangerous or hazardous structures shall be considered as being supplementary to the rights and remedies under Chapter 50 or under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.39 to 462.401. Passed by the City Council of the City of Fridley this day of 1965. William J. Nee, Mayor ATTEST: i Marvin C. Brunsell, City Clerk \ I' First Reading: } _ Second Reading: Publish: i La • V j 60 i ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, ALTERATION, LOCATION OR MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, PROVIDING FOR THE POSTING OF BONDS: THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND FEES THEREFOR, THE REVOCATION OF PERMITS: INSPECTION AND FEES THEREFOR: PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF: AND FOR REPEALING CITY CODE SECTION 45.06 SUBD. 8 AND ENACTING CHAPTER 56. The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: 1. There is hereby enacted a new Chapter of the City Code of Fridley as follows: 56. SIGN REGULATIONS 50.Ql This ordinance 'shall hereafter be known and cited as the "Sign Regulations ". 56.02 DEFINITIONS. As used in this ordinance unless the context otherwise indicates: (1) SIGN. The Term "Sign" shall mean a name, identification, description, display, illustration, structure or device which is affixed to, or painted, or represented directly or indirectly upon a building or other outdoor surface or piece of land, and-which directs attention to an object, product, place, activity, person, institution, organization or business. (2) SIGN, AUTOMOBILE SERVICE. The Term "Automobile Service Sign" means any sign that does not exceed 32 square feet directing the motorist travelling along the highway to g place or places catering to motoring needs. These include; Auto laundry, eating establishment, motels, motor hotels, refreshment drive-ins, public garages, parking areas, repair gar- ages, service stations, drive -in theatres, and amusement parks. (3) SIGN, BILLBOARD. The term "Billboard" means any sign erected, constructed, or maintained for the purpose of outdoor advertising, whether • c: such sign is independently supported or placed upon the ground, roof or wall of any building, and the advertisement thereon does not relate to commodities being sold or the business being conducted upon the premises. (4) SIGN, BUSINESS_. The term "Business Sign" shall mean any sign which directs attention to a business or profession or to the pri- mary commodity, service or entertainment sold or offered upon the premises where such sign is located or to which it is attached. (5) SIGN, FLASHING. The term "Flashing Sign" shall mean any illuminated sign on which the artificial light is not maintained both stationary and constant in intensity and color at all times when such a sign is in use. (6) SIGN, IDENTIFICATION. `The term "Identification Sign" shall mean any sign identifying a resident, school, church or other non - business use. (7) SIGN, ILLUMINATED. The term "Illuminated Sign" shall mean any sign which has characters, letters, figures, design or outline illumi- nated by electric lights or luminous tubes as a partobf the sign proper. (8) SIGN,-TEMPORARY. The term "Temporary Sign" shall mean any sign not over 40 square feet in industrial areas or 15 square feet in all other areas which is not permanently affixed to the ground or a building. Section 56.03 FEES. Permit fees for signs shall be: (1) For signs 40 square feet or less an.initial fee of $10.00. The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly on a building, which identifies the activity or advertises products sold or services provided in that building. (2) For signs larger than 40 square feet the initial fee shall be $25.00 plus 25 cents per square foot of the sign surface exceeding 100 Square feet. -2- 0 6 K] i The annual fee shall not be charged for signs, attached directly on a building which identify the activity or advertise products sold or services provided in that building. (3) No fees are required for the non - permit signs provided for in Section 56.06 and may be waived for religious, civic, school and• public interests by :a majority vote of the City Council. Section 56.04 PERMIT APPLICATION. Application for permits shall be made upon blanks provided by the Building Inspector and shall state or have attached thereto, the following information; (1) Name, address and telephone number of applicant. (2) Location of building, structure, or lot to which or upon which the sign is to be attached or etected. (3) Position of the sign or other advertising structures in relation to nearest buildings, structures, public streets or rights of way. The drawing showing such position shall be prepared "in scale." (4) Two blueprints or ink drawings of the plans and specifica- tions and method of construction or attachment to the building or in the ground including all dimensions. Locating all light sources, wattage, Y type and color of lights, and details of any light shields or shades. (5) Copy of stress sheets and calculations showing the structure is designed for dead load and wind velocity in the amount required by this and all other ordinances of the City. (6) Name of person, firm,corporation, or association erecting structure. (7) Written consent of the owner of any land on which the .structure is to be erected. (8) Any electrical permit required for any sign. -3- n (9) AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY: ' (a) Which':would authorize and direct the City of Fridley to remove and dispose of any signs and sign structure on which a permit` has been issued but which was not renewed, if the owner does not remove the same within a 30 day period following the expiration of the permit. (b) Which would authorize and direct the City of Fridley to remove the sign and sign structure, at the expense of the applicant. where maintenance is required and the maintenance is not furnished, but only after a hearing and after a notice of 60 days specifying the main- tenance required by the City. (10) Such other information as the Building Inspector may require. Section 56.05 LICENSES AND BONDS. No person, firm, or corporation • shall engage in the business of erecting signs, nor shall he be entitled to a permit to erect a sign under this ordinance unless licensed to do so by the City Council. Such license may be. granted by the City Council after written application to the City Clerk, accompanied by an annual license fee of $25.00 and it may be terminated at° =any time for cause. The license shall expire on December.31 in the year of issuance and each year thereafter. No license shall take effect until the licenseessshs.11 file with the City Clerk a corporate surety bond in the sum of $1,000.00 conditioned that the licensees shall make proper application for all sign work, pay necessary permit fees, conform to all of the provisions of this Chapter and indemnify and hold the City, its officers and agents, harmless from any damage or claim resulting from or related to the erection or maintenance of any sign in the City by the licensee. A license and bond • shall not be required of an applicant, who is not engaged in?.the business c . a of erecting signs, and who chooses to construct And erect his own sign on his property. a�� a Section 56.06 PERMITS. It shall be unlawful to keep, install, con- struct, erect, alter, revise, reconstruct, or move any outdoor sign or sign structure within the City of Fridley without first obtaining a permit . therefor, except the following: (1) A sign not exceeding 15 square feet in area pertaining only to the sale, rental, or lease of the premises upon which displayed. (2) An identification sign, not exceeding 4 square feet.in area..- (3) A business sign not exceeding 10 feet in area, which sign is placed on non - public property. (4) A temporary political. sign in regard to a candidate or an election. (5) A.temporary sign erected by a religious, eleemosynary, charitable, benevolent, educational, public or civic interest, provided 1 I that each such sign shall bear the name and address of the responsible owner and shall be removed within 15 days after the date to which the i temporary sign has relevance. Section 56.07 GENERAL REGULATIONS. No sign shall be erected or painted in the City of Fridley unless it shall conform to and meat these regulations: (1) No sign shall be installed, 'Which by reason of position, shape or color would conflict with the proper functioning or interpretation of any traffic sign or signal. (2) There shall be no use of revolving beacons, zip flashers or similar devices that would so distract automobile traffic as to con- stitute a safety hazard. ` (3) Except in industrial and not be painted-directly to any exterior separate,frame except for temporary dis bols may be attached directly to a wall -5- commercial districts, signs shall building surface but shall be on a play windows. Sign letters, sym- by "adhesive or mechanical means. . 65 (4) Temporary signs advertising buildings for rent and for sale.' may be placed in the yard of.such building providing such signs are not closer than 10 feet to any property line and do not exceed 40 square-feet, in industrial areas and 15 square feet in other areas. (5) Signs not otherwise allowed advertising new housing devel opments of more than 30 building sites and located in Fridley may be con-'- structed in any district, providing Any one sign is not over 600 square feet; the signs are located at least 300 feet from any pre- existing home and 1,000 feet from any sign advertising the same development and the -signs are removed when the particular project is 95% sold out. ' (6) Except for grand openings and temporary signs less than 6 square feet, there shall be no temporary signs in any required setback area. There shall be no more than three such signs on any parcel and the total sign area shall not exceed 18 square feet. (7) All temporary signs shall comply immediately with these performance standards upon the date this Chapter goes into effect. (8) No signs shall overhang the public right -of -way. (9) Directional signs not located on the premises of use in question may not be located in any district except by special permit. (10) The illumination of any sign located within 500 feet of any residential district lot line shall be designed so as not to reflectnany rays of light into adjacent residences. (11) TENPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS. Temporary political signs shall be removed by the person or persons placing such signs within 15 days after the election for which they are applicable. Each such sign shall show the name-and address, printed or indelible ink, of,the person re- 4sponsible for the placing of the sign, who shall.be deemed prima facia the -6- C)(7 person who placed the sign and is responsible for its removal. No person shall deface or remove a temporary political sign, prior to 24 hours following the election, except with the consent and knowledge of the person responsible for the placing of the sign. (12) All signs shall be maintained.in good condition and " the areas around them kept free from debris, bushes, high weeds, and from anything else which would be an eyesore or nuisance. The surface of all signs must be repainted at least once every two (2) years or whenever necessary as determined by inspection to prevent the sign surface from becoming unkempt in appearance. When any sign is removed, the building inspector shall be notified and the entire surrounding area shall.. be cleared of all debris and unsightly projections and protrusions. (13) In multiple unit dwellings one identification or business sign not exceeding 12 square feet shall be permitted for each dwelling group of 6 to 12 units. One identification or business sign not ex- ceeding 40 square feet shall be ,permitted for each dwelling group of 12 or more units. (14) The permit owner shall be responsible for all of the re- quirements of this Chapter, including the liability for expense re- moral and maintenance incurred by the City. Section 56.08 SIGN REQUIREMENT BY LAND USE. If they conform r . to and meet the General Regulations, the following signs may be erected or maintained as shown for each district. No other signs shall.be r erected; except that temporary political signs, may be erected in any district. (1) R -1, R -2 and R -3 DISTRICTS. a. Type - Identification and Business. Signs only. b. Number - One only:on any lot. ..Ii 67 C. Size - Nor more than 12 square feet, except as provided for in 56.07 (15). d. Maximum height - Not more than 6 feet above lot grade. e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any sign in residential district shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from any property line. f. Illumination is allowed only where the sign does not inter- fere with other property owners._ (2) C -1 and C -1S DISTRICTS. i as Type -'Identification, Business and Automobile.Service Signs. i b. Number - NO RESTRICTION. c. Size - The gross surface area of all permitted signs on a lot or arcel shall not exceed the sum of 4 square feet P q per front foot of building. i i 'i d. Heights Restricted in height so as not to obliterate a i neighboring business. t e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any sign may u project only two feet into setback from building. f. Illumination - Illuminated but non - flashing signs permitted. (3) C -2i C -2S and P DISTRICTS. a. Type - Identification, Business, • Automobile Service and Illuminated Signs permitted. r bA Number - NO RESTRICTIONS. d, Size - NO RESTRICTIONS, d. Height: No part of a pylon or pedestal sign shall be less than 14 feet vertical distance hbove the 'street grade level. e. Projection No sign shall be closer than 10 feet from the property line. f. Illumination - Illuminated and flashing signs permitted ex- cept those which are hazardous to vehicular traffic or create a nuisance to occupants of residences in the area. (4) M -1 and M -2 DISTRICTS. a. Types - All types permitted. b. Number - NO RESTRICTIONS. C. Height - NO RESTRICTIONS. Section 56.09 GRANDFATHER CLAUSE. All Signs located within the City of Fridley prior to January 1, 1966, may continue to exist as to size, illumination and present location provided the sign does not violate any provision of the Fridley City Code up to the date this Chapter was passed and adopted. A permit is required for each existing sign but the permit application fee for each sign coming within this section shall be waived. Section 56.10 HARDSHIP WAIVER. The provisions of this Chapter may be waived wherever a strict application would bring undue hardship and the public interest would not be seriously jeopardized after a public hearing before the Board of Appeals and an affirmative vote of 4 members of the City Council. Section 56.11. Any violation of this ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate of- f ense. Section 56.12 REPEAL. Subdivision 8 of Section 45.06 and any other portions of the Fridley City Code inconsistent with this chapter are hereby repealed. IM -9- 4 68 E 701 2Z 1-i E O N A L B U I L D I N G PARTNERS IN GROWTH DJSINCSS AND PnOF Sal j70 j,,11ISSISSIPPI STREET, FRIDLEY. MINN. 55421 PHONE 560 -1320 AREA CODE (612) November 11, 1965 RETAIL COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN REFERENCE TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY'S PROPOSED SIGN ORDNANCE. The Retail Committee of the Chamber of Commerce met at 1:00 PM this date at the Colonial Cafe. The Committee considered the proposed sign ord- nance of the City of Fridley. The five members of the Committee in attendance (Leonard Inderlee, Ben Franklin (Chairman); Mr. Winters, Spartan; Art Swanson, Theisen's; Joe Krowder, Gambles; John Hilbert, Snyders;) and myself as an ex- officio member as Chamber Manager, made .the following recommendations unanimously: 1. It is recommended that a clause, popularly known as a "Grandfather' Clause ", be included in the ordnance. Such a clause should exempt and make special provisions for signs already in place prior to the adopt- ion of the ordnance. Included in this clause should be an exemption for the initial fee on any sign in place prior to the adoption of this ordnance. 2. Section 56.03 FEES. as It is recommended that in the second paragraphs of both sections 56.03 (1) and (2) the words "identifies the activity or" be inserted after the words in the second line of these paragraphs "on a building, which ". A company such'as FMC Corporation has a right to have a sign identifying their business but such name does not advertise products sold or services provided. b. The committee feels that if this ordnance is intended as a control ordnance rather than a revenue raising ordnance, the annual inspection fee should be eliminated. It is felt that the cost of inspecting the signs would be minimal9 if any such inspection is conducted at all. The initial fee should more than cover any admin- istrative expenses involved in effectuating this ordnance. We believe that*the City of Fridley would be protected against the existence of unsightly signs through the maintenance agreement with the city which is signed at the time the initial permit is secured. 3. Section 56.05 LICENSES AND BONDS The first sentence in this paragraph should be re- written to make its intent clear. It seems to suggest that no one can erect a sign without paying license fee and bond. OFFICERS DIRECTORS L.. TOftF� =Y, President �r:LE JOMI +i�iSON, Vico President LEONARD INDERLEE _ WALTER MILLER FZGC:Br�:- CH21_17Z: ,JSON, Manager WYMAN SMITH HARVEY J. JOHNSTON. `;uE Secretary - - - VIRGIL. HERRICK ERIC La VINE. f1. 2 - 4. Section 56.06 PERMITS If the annual inspection fe.e is eliminated, the committee sees no need for the last sentence in this Section requiring permits to be renewed-.. annually. 5. Section 56.07 GENERAL REGULATIONS a. The Committee feels that subsection (2) should be eliminated. It recommends that the City of Fridley's Safety Committee determine when a permit is requested whether the sign would be in conflict with an intersection. b. It is recommended that subsection (3) be eliminated. Banners and streamers are today constructed of materials that do not easily deteriorate. Business should not be deniedi.tbe use of such devices to entice trade as long as they are kept in good condition. c. Under subsection (5), the Committee questions the restrictiveness. of the definition of the word sign. Should a service station be denied the right to paint such signs as "WASHING" & "LUBRICATION" above the entrances to stalls in the station? d. It is recommended that subsection (12) be reworded to read "The illumination of any sign located within 500 feet of any residential lot line shall be designed so as not to reflect rays of light into adjacent residences ". As it is written in the ordnance, it is too restrictive. e. In subsection (16), the Committee recommends that only the permit owner, not the licensee, be solely responsible. 6. Section 56.08 SIGN REQUIREMENT BY LAND USE a. Subsection (1) d. - Recommend changing maximum height to 6 - 8 feet above lot (not street) grade. b. Subsection (1) f. - It is recommended that illumina$ed signs be allowed but restricted to size and provided the sign does not interfere with other property owners. C, Subsection (2) be - Eliminate this restriction. d. Subsecition (2) d. - The Committee believes that the height of the sign should be discretionary on whomever grants the license. It recommends that no height requirement be set, but the individual Who grants the license should a neighboring business. e. Subsection (3) be f. Subsection (3) c. g. Subsection (3) d. ment for a pylon or pedes: distance above the street he Subsection (4) - insure that the sign does not obliterate Eliminate this restriction from the ordnance. - Eliminate this restriction from the ordnance. - Eliminate this restriction except the require - tal sign to be no less than 14 feet vertical grade level. .Eliminate subsections be and c. rt ti • ,__J ORDINANCE # 317 AN EMERGENCY ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS TO RESTORE AND REPAIR THE SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER LINES AS AN AFTERMATH OR THE TORNADO AND FLOOD DISASTER. The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Section 1. That the Council finds that it is necessary to expend sums of public funds to clean sanitary sewers and storm sewers within the City of Fridley; that pursuant to the Emergency Ordinance No. 301, the Council has heretofore contrattdd with the American Pipe Cleaning Company of 2231 Edgewood Avenue, Minneapolis 26, Minnesota, to inspect and survey the said sewer lines and to prepare a documented report for submission to the federal agencies under U. S. Public Law 875 Emergency Program; that said report is now on file with the City and indicates that the said lines have been disrupted by the disastersi need cleaning, have breaks and defects that require immediate dttntian. Section 2. That the repair,\cleaning and restoration is of some magnitude and involves in excess of 17 miles of sanitary sewer; that said work must be completed by April 10, 1966, in order to comply with Public Law 875 for federal funds. Section 3. That City crews have diligently attempted to keep the sewers open since the disasters acid during the period of the survey; that the City does not have adequate manpower, equipment or available supervision to do the cleaning, repairs and restoration; that regular City crews and City equipment furnished are not eligible items for reimbursement from federal funds under Public Law 875; the City of Fridley has no available local funds fo per- form the necessary work involved. Section 4. That continuously since the April and May 1965 disasters the residents of the City have had troubles with their sewage facilities; that some residents have been on continuous alert for the backing up of the sewers into their homes. Section 5. The magnitude of the job, the oncoming Winter season and the time deadline require that the work be done by an outside contractor with sufficient crews, equipment, experience and organization to proceed at once with the necessary work. Section 6. That it is deemed necessary therefore that the City contract with to proceed forthwith with the cleaning, repair and restoration of said sewer lines all according to the standards, • 7413 • formulae and allowances under Public Law 875 and in conjunction with such supervision and inspection as may be necessary and appropriate from the City Engineer and Comstock & Davis, Inc., who are here hereby designated as consulting engineers for the City on said project. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 15th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1965. William J. Nee, Mayor ATTEST: i 4 X 1 �I�� irEOtsJ�1 �GCMCY. Gvw . ;'. If MORE SPACK 19 MCQU1R60 USK R19VKIISK 5 51019 OR •KPARATK RMKKT DATE OF DECLARATION "u? piston No. • /`I PRII. if 19(0 HCW FEGICN No. DATE OF INSPECTION SLI PPLGMEN•rAL- STATE ©C-TOr3ER �6 /9G If ..b ENGINEER INSPECTION REPORT - P.L. 87S /1'11 NN6SOTi4 HOTO REF. COUNTY EMERGENCY 1p REGULAR ❑DEBRIS C3 GRANT IN LIEU LOC&L JURISDICTION REPAIR Y' REPAIR CLEARANCE -RIOLB INSPECTION MADE BY REPRESENTING STATE OR OEP PROJECT NO. ITEM OR REF. NO. %OM W 4Sf30TT &N , A/IM/V • f�6PT, v-f yC.4VrOF 1. L -AR1ey 6Rt'1MyI t?&T /1 ti a DESCRIPTION OF DAMAGE y, L9oNAlf� /yAR.SHALL , yS Pl�S Sa✓I� /SI'1tj �y,,tv�% SO�e �a/��va.{ 3• N S 1 BS C- I T EN G I N Ce'R GL/'d z e'ab q vt 01 0.14 e r Glee b r IS pQ/eef / (f LOC�A!TION 1 �1 ,1n Sewe(rg %y f�ooq% t_orna"Oes. a"Ot �sj2N2NQ! "a LCa( CNN 07 il^I� /P raINS QS Gi�QSCrlbl� li+ 47TACK�� S�ee7J'. Also x6we 6r�oke�I ble ,.,,Q 16".ys . Q WATER PLANT ❑ OTHER (Spteifr) FACILITY TYPE ORIGINAL FACILITY i ❑ SEWER PLANT . 5A EWOle Sy STE/`I I ❑ SEWER AJ )TARy WATER PLANT DESCRIPTION SEWER PLANT OR SEWER DESCRIPTION OTHER DESCRIPTION in c�, savt;iaNy spwe vs. iq ELIGIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON _ eQ�aC%Tr e � SQH /7/IPy St'coerS SeN /OIt3I(/ r`ea0iet P�J ClAIiS/N•/ INELIGIBLE a! ECOMMENDED WORK {I�H'lou -e'- SciHCll .�!/P.-� RN� tro��er g /e/7N�S /rvs.J� sewe. -s ctihQ /`Pe s //uc�//t q�erpli7rioN /S SC/77/C /PN'r /O. CQnnNSe ale-re"�///�Q rprokle /`N►f /CQJ A/7oe{/t� SJItP77 �p Qlr S2we h 6lP�llr aS INL71tp/v OH aTIQC{/t S/7PfTS DETAILED ESTIMATE QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL AND /OR DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE COST 061-360 'fee% �' fflrg"4A 2y iN� d.:/.,p�et.• Sewer• 200 _ �J 300 fee+ � �rooaN .21 ioep �% /an.P�er Sewer tol7tk�. pro�ablr nredr. cle40169 �,/ L bwF cauldM� b� �Nsp��od $/i4 /l-! c A /S' e0o �J/7iPE�T ,e vim Stu v.- � SrYGPSwrs ��iwr �uW rof bl *ore Orir♦ eapw Ori.t ;0 // /&a W5 f. - �„ %..tif Ai/ rice � ,�; 43z- Sewer br {o� rcpnirs a.� (* �I r ecr,' 30 i cleaN H' J e��', �4/1-t �nys�� %ar�o�/• o/N Uo /fAMIP ai .QTel -Al • �Q 1'+2.?.OYP4 ~ \ Sewerr. All a /ij;hk sewers are a /ash '�3 -ti► /�• 7iLn 4 oc�e.i shoe /s ' •tuert 'hIkQH fro." 0 ro/oar•1- 'PrePgro41 6/• 7�Qf1Nler�o.r N'oe &O -wePS -4f /r, 04 -1,WV "Fru4 Surve Tal A� ust IIA!r I moo/ �3 /r 3 S {GNATURES. TATE HEALTH AGENCY _ / (Inspecting '%tol estimated Lost.... Engineers) ;'. If MORE SPACK 19 MCQU1R60 USK R19VKIISK 5 51019 OR •KPARATK RMKKT rte I D L- ,P-� Y /'/ lNitl Es o 7-,4 DETAILED ESTIMATE QUANTITY UNIT MATERIAL AND /OR DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE COST lqy sYs' , 4e g -iti�A - o��Ar.,e7�e� SaN,YQrr sewer 7 3 9.S' p Av '1 S h N ~ 4 opt oe I .O / tC�� i �i llf o7'et �e r�'"a0L.. sew 404,110 14 �e gas oc� Co a a r u e S u�elia c c SNU, P_ 7 Cv ti Q • c,� r t' .PS a BS S /HC 1 7fle of /CA /H Sw w a -w v A S 4s qli re sewev s .Tf4y 1 IAP 71 tos . e�yb0 310 4 • _ r • 75 N 4 4 4 is N ' y _JyI_r %�0 1 77 PARES AND PLAYGROUNDS SUB - COMMITTEE MRETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 16, 1965 The M sting was called to order at 7230 P.M., at the City Hall in the City of Fridley by Chairman Hughes. ROLL CALL HEWERS PRESENT: Hughes and Skjervold OTHERS PRESENT-. Jacqueline Strauss, League of Women Voters Paul Brown, Director OCTOBER 18, 1965 MINUTES rrrrrrr rs..r+.rr.�.r The Minutes of the mating of October 18, 1965 were adopted as mailed. am BUSINESS BROWN REPORT: 1. LOCU PARK CLEANUP BIDS: A total of seven bids for Locke Park cleanup will be submitted to the Council. This is for the remaining fifty acres of cleanup work in the park. 2. TRUCK: Bids will be advertised from November 21, 1965 to December 1, 196 and opened on December 6, 1965 for a 3%4 ton, 4 -wheel drive Pick -up with snow plow attached. The 1957 Willys Jeep will be used as trade for the new truck. 3, MOORE LAKE: FILL: We will not be likely to get more fill until next spring and the spring construction season. 4. HL� The Health Inspector will provide us with a copy of last yearns bacteria counts, Next summer we will have the reports available immediately after the testing has been done. Mr. Brown will remind the inspector of this early next season. 5. ICE SHAVER: There is some doubt at this time that the Legion will be able to provide us with an ice shaver for this season. Without this ice shaver we will not be able to maintain a good surface for speed skating and the speed skating program that was thought of perhaps will have to be abandoned. NEW BUSINESS: Rr=VZBW HEIGHTS ADDITION, BLOCK 6, LOTS 39 -40: The Commission has no objection to the issuance of a Building Permit for this property. HORIZON HEIGHTS. BLOCK 1. LOTS 3_AND 4: If the land has natural drainage, then we would like to acquire,this property as a neighborhood play area. Topography maps will be checked as well as a neighborhood spot check on drainage conditions in the area. ( NDA ON , : C_OONC That�we o give I%R above�desc ibend r oertm oa the recommendation of Mr. Brown. PARRS AND PLAYGROUNDS SUB- COMaTTER P MMES - NOVEMI ER 16, 1965 FACE 2 HOCKEY RXNK: The Hockey Rink has been moved to the west /southwest of the Rice Creak School. Construction of boards has been begun by the Fridley Lumber Company. The School will provide instructors. There is water available for use on the hockey rink during the winter season. BUDGET: Our budget foz 1966 was cut by $41,487.00 from the budget request. The budget allowed then is $59',310a00 for 1966. This suss represents a cut of $10,200.00 from the 1965 and a $3,000 cut from the 1964 total, and represents $16,000 below the 196.3 level budget. This is the lowest budget for Parks and Playgrounds since 1962. In 1962 the Parks and Playgrounds Sub- Committee was only $6,000 below its .operating level in 1966. INSTRUCTION TO MR. BROWNS Mr.. Brown will go over the program for next year giving primary consideration to Melody Manor, Flannery, Broad and Hugo, and Capitol and Hughes as neighborhood parks and to the Moore Lake Beach and Locke Park as a general consideration. Mr. Brown will attempt to fit our 1966 finance "s to these needed projects. ADJOMUOIENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:55 P,M Respectfully submitted, Christian R. Skjervold'' - Secretary to the Park# and Playground Sub - Committee 0 %78 CITY OF FRIDLEY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Paul Brown, Director 6431 University Avenue N.E. Phone: 560 -3450 December 6, 1965 Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. -Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Re:. Bids on New Truck Oaened.on December 6,1965 at 12 :00 o'clock Noon The following are the bids submitted from five different automobile companies: Bidder Cash Price Trade-In Net Price Del. Date Major Ford Ford P250 $300.00 $29347.00 45 -60 days $2,647.00 Midway Ford Ford F250 x,1$250.19 $2,784.00 6 days McGee Truck GMC K -1502 $425.00 $22732.17 45 days .75 Anoka International Int. D1200 $19173.35 $20500.00 days $3,673.35 Iten Chev. Chev. K2534 $800.00 $22179.00 45 days $2,979.58 Les Chesney, Superintendent of Public Works, and I have examined the bids and find that the low bid on the 3/4 Ton Truck with Plow was submitted by Iten Chevrolet Company. I recommend that their proposal for the 3/4 Ton Truck in. :amount of $2,179.00 be accepted. aul Brown, Director Parks and Recreation Department i • '7(3 CITY OF FRID13Y PARKS ANA RECREATIO124 DEPARiMM Paul Bra, Director 6Q1 Uniyersit ? Avenue I§L� -2 450 0 NEW TRUCK d wn b� TRUCK �Y i, �QA BIDS OPENED ON DECEMBER 6... 196 AT 12:00, NOON ONE WN TON 4 MMEL DR,IFE TRUCK .J11ni BOX AND SN(ik; PLOW Eid Delivery Bidder Securi Cash Prig@ _ ¢ Trade In Net Price Eastside Ford 683 E. 7th Street St. Paul 6. Him Main Motor Sales Co. 222 E. Main Andm, Minn. d� 4&r Ford East Lake St. Minneapolis, Minn. J Midway Dodge 1013 University Ave. St. Paule Minn. Midway Ford ��°� A( 1850 University Ave. St. Paul, Minn. Ag Minatr Ford Co. 1708 Central Ave. NE Minneapolis, Minn. Osoeo Motor Co. 208 Central Avw ne ©sseog %lime, 4 Page 2. S« CITY OF FRIDI3' NW TRUCK BIDS E d Delivery Bidder ® SWU Cash Price Trades In Net Pries Date Paron Motors 1561 HigWv #8 New Brighton,, Minn. Midway Chevrolet 1389 University Ave. St. Paulo Minis. Grossman Chevrolet Co. 1304 E. sake St. Minneapolis, Minn. Park Jeep Sales . Lou3stParooddalo Minna McGee Trucks,, Inc. 88 Mazzwood Ave. Minneapolis 3s Minn. Brooldaalle Ford � Hwy #100 & 57th Ave. No // /J -- Ct� /�� — 2 J Minaeapolfas Minnp Anoka Into Sales & Sery HvW #10 West films Minn. 55303 AD Ray Chavrolet 1623 W. Broadway Kim espolis9 Minno c% Dave .Hurd ► 4 GlTY OF FRIDLEY NEW TRUCK BIDS i Page 3. .c„ CONSTRUCTION OP TXUaS COURTS MDOU LAKE Bi:A,CHI PARK Bids Opened an December 6, 1965 at 12:00 Noon Bidder Bid Securit L Sum Bld Conetr. Data Carlson•Lavins Coast. 2854 Columbus Ave. Minneapolis, Minn. Dunkley Surfacing Co. 5756 N.B. Grand Ave. Minneapolis, Him. C. S. MaCrossaa, Inc. &t. 2, Boat 322 Osseo, Minn. Harland Constr. Co. 6230 Sunrise Drive Fridley, Minn. � Z CITY OF FRIDLEY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT Paul Brown$ Director 6431 University Avenue N.E. Phone: 560 -3450 December 6, 1965 Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Re: .Bids on Construction of Tennis Co„ urts Moore Lake Beach & Park opened on December 1965 at 12:00 o'clock Noon The following are the bids submitted from three different construction companies: Bidder Lump Sum Bid Completion Date Carlson- Lavine Constr. $5,65.00 June 1, 1966 II Dunkley Surfacing Co. $4,455.64 June 10, 1966. C. S. McCrossan, Inc. $5,167.25 June 10, 1966 Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant, and I have examined the bids and find that' the low bid on the construction of Tennis Courts at Moore Lake Beach and Park was submitted by Dunkley Surfacing Company. I recommend that the proposal for said Tennis Courts in amount of $4,455.64 be accepted, II Price for Tennis Courts includes a court comparable to those now located at i the Commons Park with the exception'.of the Laykold playing - surface. Paul Brown, Ditet or Parks and Recreation Department r (7e PLAN11111C COMCIISSION HEETING - 1MVEMBER 18, 1965 Pave The meeting was called to order by Chairman Kravik at 7 :45 P.T. ROLL CALL: Members present: Kravik, Johanson, Bendel, IIu her Member absent: Bergman Others present: City Manager Wagner APPROVE MINUTES CW PIXMING COWIISSION IIMTIIIG - OCTOBER 14, 1965: MOTION by Bendel, seconded.by Johanson, that the Planning Commirrion Minutes of October 14, 1965 be approved. Upon is voice vote, the motion carried. APPROVE MINUTES OF PLANNING CM61ISSION MEBTiNC - OCTOBER 28 1965: MOTION by Bendel, seconded by Johanson, that the Planning Commire1on Minutes of October 28, 1965 be approved. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. RECEIVE MINUTES OF RECREATION C0K1ISSIO9 MEBTIITG - SEPTEMBER IQ, 1965: MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Hughes, that the Minutes of the Recreation • Meeting of'September 30, 1965 be received. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. RECEIVE MINUTES OF PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS SUIT- C0121ITTSE MEETING - OCTOBER 18 1965: MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Hughes, that the Minutes of the Parkr and Playgrounds Sub- Comittee meeting of October 18, 1965 be received. Unon a voice vote, the motion carried. RECEIVE MINUTES OF STREETS AND UTILITIES SUB- CM41ITT88 MSSTING - NOVINDER 9 1965: MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning CommiFFion receive the Minutes of the Streets and Utilities Sub - Committee meeting of November 9, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. RMEIVE MINUTES OF PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS SUB- CMWTTBF. MEETING - I`OVEMBER 9 1965: 1=1014 by Johanson, seconded by Uughes, that the Planning Commirrion receive the Minutes of the Plats and Subdivisions Sub - Committee meeting of November 9, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. 1. CONTINUED LOT SPLIT URST: L.S. #65-10 VER1 )O11 R. LARSOii: Bart 273 feet of Lot 14, Auditor's Subdivision #129 together with easement over North 30 feet of Lot 14 lying West of Rest 273 feet. 0 Mr. Vernon Larson was present. 84_ Pla nin g, C aission Meeting .. November 18, 1:165 Page 2 • Mr. Dandel explained that the original request vas for four lots, but that the Plats and Subdivisions Sub- Comittee felt the lots were too mall and suggested that the parcel be split into threw lots. Mr. Larson agreed to this. MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Bandel, that they Planning Commission concur vith the Plats and Subdivisions Sub - Committee and recommend lot split 05-10 De on._ beinpt rths _moist 273 feet of Lot 14. Auditor'r Sub- division #129 tea94 -13 with easement over 30 set of Lit 14 i West of East ,273 feet by splitting the rarcel into three lots and re� d than Easterly t o lots until remmv_sal of the present structure. Upon a voice 2. CONTIMMD LOT SPLIT URST: L.S. 064-08 ORVILLE RATLBY: Lots 13, 14, and 15, Block 16, Hamilton s Addition to Mechanicsville. The Commission discussed the setback requirements for the house on the corner. MOTION by Bendel, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission a Cite Lot Split 64a08 O rvil.lt_ �t1e_ ,_.?�� ,� 1�.�� .�iaGk� -6-, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville as shown on certificate of surveyr 5298 _Book TJo. 1Tgk.;24),W splitting the lots North and South. Upon a vote, aQll voting aye, the motion carried. • MOTION by Hughes, seconded by Bendel, that the Planning Commission red tag the corneae lot of Lot Split #64 -08, Orville R.atiey, Lot 15, Block 16, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville so that when application for a building permit for this lot is :ad&, the request may be put on the agenda of the Building Board. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the notion carried. 3. LOT SPLIT 08ST. L.S. #65-16 ALLEN G. JENSEN: Lots 6 and 7, Block 25, Hyde Park Addition. MOTION by Bendel, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission Grove the lot split request._ L.S.#65 -16. -Allen Jensen. being- Lots 6 and 7 Block 25. Hyde Park Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the nation carried. 4. VACATION USST: SAV #65-04 ALLEN G. JRITSEN: Vacation easement on portion already vacated, 57k Avenue lying South of Lot 6, Block 25, Hyde Park Addition. MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission approve the vacation request._ SAV #6504 Allen_GJensen. bein the vacation of the easement on th grtioa a�l_regdv_ vaaated,� SPA avenue 1r 8 Soutb _Tlqt 6�j ck25. Hvde Pak Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 5. LOT SPLIT IM UBST: L.S. #63-15 KENNETH L. HALL: Lot 5. Auditor'r Sub- division F108. . Mr. and Mrs. Hall were present. !ltetinq ..�:-..I:aveimtscv�l$ _ ^1965 M.... ., _.__ro.�.....,_ ... �_.P_a gae 3 • ttr. M11 was requesting m eplit of two parcels at this time, but ultimately hopes to split the large portion into 66 foot lots. 'Mr. Pandci explained that the Plats and Subdivisions Sub- Co=itten slid not approve of such m=11 Icts, boat that fact would not have too much bearing on the prevent lot split. MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Bandel, tba cur with the Streets and Utilities Sub - Committee else _opvroral of the Lot 5v1it #65-15. Renneth L. Subdivision 01.06 troou recesipt_ of ..1 dedicat:iou._of and 50 feet for a future read Aron the center of voto, all voting aye, cite motion carried. t the Planning Couzmirrion con - and xeco end to Counc l . Hall. Lot S.�Auditor'e 30 feet for .Onondaea Avenue the parcel. Upon a voice The Commission Tequested the City Attorney, Wyman Smith, be contacted regarding the rise of this lot in relation platting. 6, LOT SPLIT B�U,RST: L.S. wli. NYGARD: That part of Lot 14, Auditor's- Subdivision 4129 lying West of Fast 273 feet kept West 17 feet taken for Central Avenue and except easement over North 30 feet for road. Mr. Nygard van present, and gave a copy of the quit claim deed from Vernon Larson for the North 30 feet of Lot 14, Auditor's Subdivision #129. lying West of the Rast 273 feet to the Commission for the Vygard file. • Mr. Bendel explained that the Plats and Subdivisions Sub- Coamnittee felt the corner lot of 80"x132' would be too small for a commercial venture because of setbacks and parking and that Mr. Nygard agreed to add 10 feet to the lot. MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning.Commission concur with the Plats and Subdivisions Sub-Committee and xeenend_ �tnnr�val Subdivision T#129 lv�ta�a west cif _eae.t 273, feet_e*.xoent. west l7feet taken for entrs�l AvantxaZ,., akixtg„ one lot 90 60t wide and the other 160.25 ,feet. and _astific�ato.__suvev. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 7. CONTINUED SPECIAL USE PERMIT: NURSING HOME, MIKE HAPTIER: Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition. Southwest corner 9 200'x600'. Hr. George Hedlund, attorney for the Nursing home project, telephoned that the plazas were not ready. MOTION by Hughes, seconded by Bandel, that this item be continued until the nest regular meeting on December 16, 1965. S. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA #65 -08, MIKE ILkMR: Rezone Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition except that part taken by Dr. Lester for Clinic and parcel for Nursing Horse by M. tlafner. • Mr. Rehbein returned with new plans as requested at the previour meeting. The area requirements appear to be adequate; there was some dircurrion regarding apartments in the vicinity of a hospital complex; however, the proposed buildings are of modern construction with underground garage£. �C7 Planning; Cossmiisston Meeting td*vember 18, 1965 Page 4 L.2—%n • Regarding the rezoning, it was felt that C -1 could be used for the whole Outlot 1, as shops and motels co,--,e under that category, except that portion needed for multiple dwelling, which is R -3A. Chairman Krevik stated.that, in light of the fact that we are considering a series of changes in regard to zoning cat.egaz , it might be well to wait; or it might be advisable to submit the new plans to Iiodne and Associates getting them; opinion how they would develop the tares and the Planning Commission then evaluate the request. MDTION by Hughes, seconded by Bandel, that the Planning Commission receive the set of Plans and Specifications for the proposed Motel and Apartments presented at the November 18th meting, and refer them to Hodue and Associates for their opinion as to the suitability of this type of development with consideration to the area adjacent to the hospital. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. MMON by Johanson, seconded by Bandei, that the Planning Commission set a public hearing date of December 16, 1965 for the rezoning of the area of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition except that part taken by Dr. 'Lester for Clinic and parcel of 200 "x600' for Hafner Nursing Home contingent upon receiving a letter from Mr. Hafner describing the area to be rezoned and the category. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 9. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY MAT P.S. #62 -10R COMMME PARR MIRE HAFNER: • West half of the Northwest half of Section 11, West of University Avenue and South of Osborne Road. Mr. Ronald Johnson of Clemron, Incorporated showed a sketch of the proposed preliminary plat of Commerce Park. The original plat, P.S. #62 -10, had never been recorded because of the fact that the amount of land needed by the Highway could not be determined at that tune. The Commission told Mr. Johnson his sketch was satisfactory at this point. The proposed Commerce Lane and service drive appears to be satis- factory, except a suggestion was made to have the entrance and exit on 73rd Avenue and Osborne Road back from Highway #47. It was felt the Plats and Subdivisions and Streets and Utilities Sub - Committees should review the new proposed plat for Commerce Park. 10. REZONING UEST: ZOA #65 -09 MIRE HAFNER: Rezone proposed preliminary plat 076 2 -10R Commerce Park. The Commission discussed with Mr. Rafner and Ron Johnson the present zoning and possible changes for the future depending upon the types of structures. The Commission asked Mr. Hafner to send a letter relative to rezoning and platting this area. • HM011 by Hughes, seconded by Johanson, that the Planning Comission authorize the advertising of public hearings on Proposed Preliminary Plat (#62 -10k) Commerce Plat, Mike Hafner, being the Wh of the NWT of Section 11, West of University Avenue and South of Osborne Road and rezoning of S7 I?l nl,ta-, Cssuatiasion Meeting — November ll -1965 Page 5 • said preliminary plat with the known documentation for December 16, 1965 which Will give sample opportunity for the Streets and Utilitier and Plats and Subdivisions Sub.- Committeas to review same before the next meeting. Upwa a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 11. PROPOSED MUSING CODE: MOTION by Hughes, seconded by Bendel, that the Planning Commission continue the Proposed Housing Code until the December 16th meeting. Upon a v *ice vote, all voting aye, the wotion carried. 12. PUBLIC ROUSING FOR THE AGED; Mr. George Danielson stated that as long as the 'Fridley housing Authority is set up, it would be a good time to set up a small unit for the aged. Mr. Danielson said that he had talked with several older people who were on fixed incomes and they showed interest in this type of building. He stated the funds would come from the Federal Government and the income from the unit would be used in Fridley. He felt that now would be the time for the Housing Authority to look into it, and have the County Commissioners approve of it. The Commission stated they were glad Mr. Danielson brought up this request, but would like other organizations to get interested in this type of housing, and wondered if there were enough funds available to conduct a study. • MMON by Bendel, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission recommend to the_Gity Council to refer the vossibility of building Senior Citizen Housing under Federal Finances to the housing and Re- devel©poen Authari. y. Upon a✓voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. Mss. Danielson then said he wanted to make a statement and h wished the Council to take notice.--- H at e stated he has alwavr known Earl -N er to work for the interest �of�Fridjgy in the part rix years and he epprecim�c�d hid loyaltv�-._t1 e�la .ned that. in_4he Bart he had "picked on!' Mr. Waanerr who. never under these circunetancer. forgot to be gentleman._Ile then added that MT. Wainer has alwayr had the interest of Fridley at heart and deserves whatever praise he gat: bauso he has "xned pit. _. 13. FUTURE REZ014IIM: MOTI011 by Hughes, seconded by Johanson, that the Planning Coommirrion ask Hodne and Associates to study the area West of University Avenue and East of the Railroad Tracks, Ilorth of 69th Avenue to City Limitr for purposes of recommending the best potential use for that area and the optimum zoning for the area, and to ask him, also, if the City should proceed with the #701 program. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. • ADJOURIMENT . There being, no further business, Chairman Kravik adjourned the meeting at 9 :45 P.M. Res t 1y itted, Reco ing Secretary f == FIELD a SURVEYORS s - �,.�, -.., 2825 HARRIET AVE. r F MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA Este. liar - CEMTIFICATE OF. SUMVEY For - L.S. #64.08 LN 7" . zv" 1I . i hOWELG //YG, � �fi 1 u � J SC,94 E - =�a N •�,r� /. ;a I DDUCRIPTION The went 60 feet of Lots 130 14 and 15, Block 16, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, I� w �R.o't � - - . �:. -- � .-•� : _ � _ � now r We hereby certify that th s is a true and correct representation of a survey of e boundaries of the land above described and of the location ofall bullding4 any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Oa ted this day of Cj<<r� EGAN FIELD b NOWAK Sur .eyors F i I e No S"Z 98 1180.ok No CS -64 Iota Haim] Me& 60 1 ti w Kt N W hereby certify that, this is a true a d� corrects represent at of a curve boundaries of the land above described and of the buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, ofrom oor -on all Dated this day of E GA N, FIELD d N OWA K Ury fors Fi Ie No SZyG 80ok No / /-,P by ;..- • i r 00 f 69 -- — uj z — - -9 - -- W LLJ Ap �v Z `• / Z� // Z Z - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- h 14, e ja .o ro 59TH AVENUE N.E. z 29 _ 2 07 4 21 4 re_ ... - 29 7 ,7 G 19 /9 - 12' 17 ' � � �� . i 5' a • /r , -%s • d wig ; � � ��- 1� 58TH AVENUE N.E. C _ -. ArIf 51,z I - 19 I /2 zs a,IZ��5�6118 9 /O�. / /, /l. /3/¢'/_ 112; 31¢'8.6 =.&S ao p L _ 57 TH 4 5 6;7 i� w114 CORNER SEC. 23 ¢I5 I I � L$ SplG, #65 -16 A en it Jensen .100,58th Ave. N.E. Lots 6 & 7, Block 25, Hyde Park Addition U / •/� ;g --�-- �.. ,�uc�C ..cam tox LA s u e+ � r Dean da � a /eve �•� /9A - rvtvre 'Rcsk S'or t n cb +4 bo M y' t�� 1 sc • LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA LICENSED BY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 3616 EAST 55rm STREET DREXEL 4681 &urbeper'z Xicenze ',.o . !03(D6 to G` N 1 (1 I j Ilk { } N , 1 { WE HEREBY i CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT PLAT OF A SURVEY OF - i `sha t, ;part of Lot 14 P. a:-' -t. tor's ' oiilx'ivislcm No. 129 Anoka County, - lyi.%, 'Nest of tie �a st, 27,:.0 feet, except the .est 17.0 feet tai -.gin for Ceiz# ral Ave . " rici exce �} ink; an easement over t.e "t north 30 feet for road pur!)oses . 4 AS SURVEYED BY US THIS.,--- • 1 llt ",• 1ti.�1.__ A.D._ _ .. .. __OAY OF__ I j } r SIGNED F. C. JACKSON, M1 OTA REGISTRATION, NO. 3600 ! V i , 94- _ • -5 v h _ t� 1� ( t 4 Hans Nygard • 7451 Central Ave. N.E. - Fridley o .._,- _ 0 10 BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES - DEC== 10 1965 The Meeting was called to order by Chairman Nawrocki at 7132 P.M. B.� L MRIMS, Pass=: Nawrocki, Fitspatrick, Goodrich iOMRS ABSKNTt Saunders, Jaakovski Mr. and Mrs. Belgum were present. Mr. Douglas White, 5521 Fillmore Street Northeast, their next door neighbor, was present and stated that he was very much in favor of granting this request. n a granted. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman declared the motion carried. . 2. PUBLIC BRAKING ON A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE-FROM SECTION 45.23, CITY CODE OF �FBiDLSY MINNESOTA 1963 BY WAIVER OF SIDE YARD.... UIBEMRNT FROM 10 PUT TO 5_FECT TO PERMIT REMODELING ATTACHED GARAGE INTO DWELLING AREA ON LOT 1, BLOCK 5 ADDITION, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, SAID BEING 59 � 77TH STREET NORTHEAST., FRIALBY.,,a MINNESOTA WQUEST BY KENNETH JOHNSEN 5980 - 7TB STREET NORTHEAST, FMLEY, Xvms2m.L. 3. • Mr. Johnsen was present. Notion by Fitzpatrick,. seconded by Goodrich, ^ to recomaaend _ o th n oat the Variance be wanted. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Nawrocki declared the motion carried. Mr. Tony Gnerre was present representing the petitioners. I%tlon by „Goc^drehk seconded by Fitzpatrick, to. xecoaaaend_ to the council tb .:._ _. �..... �_._....... s.,. �. the Variane „�eygzanted. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Newrocki declared the motion carried. 95 96 • BOM OF APPLUS MDMM OP DECEMBER 1, 1965 PAGE Z 4. Mr. and Mrs. Steuart were present. _td6otion by Fitzpatrick seconded by Goodrich to recoeiead to the Council that. the Special Use Permits be gaaated Upon vote, tfere be ao mays, A., s �., _.._ , . v a Chairman Nawrocki declared thenmotian carried. ADJdCTBl3l�NT s There being no farther business, Chairman Nawrocki declared the meeting adjourned at 8 :08 P.M. Respectfully submitted, • 8ari P. Wagner Secretary to the Board • • FRIDLEY SABETr CQMITTEE SPECIAL METING HINMES - NOV9H= 10, 1965 The Fridley Safety Committee Special Meting was called to order by Mairmea Leeson at 7 :31 P.M. BOLL CALL M�smbers Presents Lamm, Linton, Bendel, Szogda, Weise, Bossing Othere Presents Stan: Smith, Gift House Stamp Company We Mayo, National Tea Company PASRIbiG AT TIN MROUL TEA STME AND BUSGEQ BZNG BBSTAUBANTs rlir�l�l�.��.��/I�Y There was a discussion of the parking situation at the National Tea Store and the Barger King Restaurant. Motion by Linton, seconded by.Waiss, for approval of 900 parking • with 30 foot driveways. The motion carried. At"J�OUBNTI The meeting was adjourned at 8 :10 P.M. Respectfully submitteds, Deloris Bandel Secretary 0 FRID-aY '33A11Th i:rtDffTT?'F MEETING I�.�rUTES - NOVDMER 17, 1965 The Meeting of the Fridley Safety Committee was walled to order at 5:05 P.M. ROIL CALL Members Present: Weiss, Larson, Linton, Fritz, Rossing, Reverend Stone, Ssegda Others Present: Mika O'Bannon, Anoka County Commissioner Lee Switzer, Principal of Parkview Elementary School MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SAFETY COTTER MEETING - OCTOBER 20. 1965: The minutes of the Regular Safety Committee Meeting of October 20, 1965' were approved as read. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL SAFETY COhMaTTEE MEEIT_NG - NOVEMBER 10. 1965.- The minutes of the November 10, 1965 Special Safety Committee Meeting were approved as read. FOUR -WAY STOP SIGNS AT 61ST AND 7TH STREETS N7RTHUST (TABLED 10/20/65): • There was a discussion about the tabled action of having four -way stop signs on 61st and 7th Streets Northeast instead of flashing school signals. Motion by Weiss, seconded by Linton, that the flashing lights should be left as they are for the present, and it be further recommended that in the future, if traffic would warrant it, regular semaphores be installed at th ib crossing. The motion carried. PERIODIC TRAFFIC: COUNT AT Iii AND 61ST STREETS NORTHEAST: A request has been made that a two month periodic traffic count be made at 7th and 61st Streets Northeast by the Safety Committee. Motion by Fritz, seconded by Weiss, that a two seonth periodic traffic count be made at 7th and flat Streets Northeast to determine the increase or decrease of traffic to see if semaphores are warranted at this crossing. The motion carried. STOP SIGN INS L= ATIOF ON ALL STREETS LEADING TO OR CROSSING 53RD AVEM NORrJEAST FROM LWIVEA.SITY AVENM TO T.F.. #651 Motion by Weiss, seconded ty Linton, that all streets leading to or crossing 53rd Avenue Fortheast from Ir9iversity Avenue to T,H. #65 should have ,,top signs La stalled. The erotica carried. 98 I0 1 s r L M I0 • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. BUILDING BOARD FETING - DEMBER 1, 1965_ ROU CALL. S PRESENT*. Kravik, Ellis, Wallace, Hauge, Tonco, Herder. M M M ABSENT: Kirkham (Late). VISITORS PRESENT: Ben Mayers=, Sonny Miller, Milto Bueflodt, Gary Lyons, Tbny Gnerre After a discussion about the appearance of the addition in relation to the present structure, Haage moved the building,pexmit bq recommend or econded by Toaco. , Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Kravik declared the _ton„�casried. The problem of an additional, access road onto East River Road.was discussed. Kravik suggested consideration be given to moving the drive- way to-the north between lots in order to eliminate another access road. A nation recommending approval of the Buildiaag Permit after the Safe ,.� W. ., N Committee has considered the driveway problems was made by Wallace. Hauge seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Kravik declared the motion carried., A motion Was made by Wallace for recommendation for approval of the Bulld!!F ' ermit rovidin t7�e gal s not stuccoed are painted..__. scan d y H Bg• Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Kravik declared the notion carried. A motion was made by Herder recommending approval of the jBufdin$vPermit. becaaed b Tosco, upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Chairman Kravik dac2areil the motion carried. After a discussion dealing with the temporary condition and the eaist«nce of the structure it was decided no action could be taken. Border moved to neither approve nor disapprove recomomWation of the Buildiag Permit. Seconded by Tone*. Upon a voice vote, there being no nay *, Chaisosn Kravii declared the motion carried. BUIbD1NG BOOM M==8 OF DE MM 1, 1965 0 ADJOUNT: PAGE 2 There being no further business, Chairman Kravik declared the muting adjourned at 8 :30 P.M. Respectfully submittedt Olive L. Harder Secretary to the Board 0 101 0 FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REAEMORWiT AUTHORITY IM-TING - NOVEMBER 10, 1965 The meeting was called to order at 8:15 P.M. ROCALL Present: Chairmen Richard Herder, Commissioners Paul Barrov,.John Meyerp and Lois Mullin, and Executive Director Allan Anderson. Coiasioner Robert Kendall arrived later in the meeting. Visitors: Dave Alberts, Tom Hodns, and Jim Barrington of Hodn! Associates, Harold Callender and Ernie Powell Absents None APPROVAL OF MINUTES -- MEETING _ OF_N_OTMER 3. 1965 A suggestion was made by Mr. Bex-row that in the futur e be listed under one heading. ft. Barrow made a motio meeting of November 3, 1965, be accepted as received. motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said BILLS AND COMMIIBICATIONS the Bills and Coammvnicatione n that the minutes of the Mr. Meyer seconded the motion passed unanimously. • Federal Ho inM Administration - Chairman Herder read the applicable paragraph of the letter from the Federal'Housing Administration concerning the FBA Rental Housing Conference to be held December 9, 1965, at the Hotel Pick- Nicollet in Mimieapolis at 2:UO P.M. It vow suggvated that the letter be scent to'City Manager Earl Wagner for circulation at the City Hall. Small Business Administration - Chairman Herder read a copy of the letter Mr. Anderson had sent to the Small Business Administration requesting information on obtaining private Loans for the removal of homes from a3 flood area. In a return telephone call, Mr. Anderson had been informed that the Small Business Adminis- tration could provide such loans if the home had suffered some damage during the flood. After removal of the home, however, the land could not again be used for residential purposes. As there is limited time available for acquisition of these loans, Mr. Anderson will inform residents of Riverviev as soon as possible. He was directed to work with Mr. Wagner and Mayor Nee on this as it is a City problem. i eaAua of Women Voter - Chairman Herder read aa, copy of the letter Mr. Anderson had seat to the League of Women 'voters of Fridley as requested at the meeting of November 3, 1965. Proposed Ordnance for "Housing Cade" - A cop; of the proposed Ordnance for a Fridley Housing Code was received and read. It was stated that copies had been distributed to the Council members and it was hoped to adopt the cod! by •reference. 103 EXWM Vlr DIRWTOR•S REPORT • Statement of Account - Vx. Anderson presented they Commissioners with an account statement and explained expenditures item by item. It was decided that we should make application for the rest of the feasibility study money. Re er Johnson - Mr. Anderson stated that Mr. Johnson teas in the area now completing the field work on the City Center documentation. 41 maxa Smith Report - Air . Smith's report was postponed until the next meeting eats Y p he was unable to attend the meeting. Elmer Binford - Mr. Binford is in town but has been requested by his aware office not to appear before the Authority until a local decision has been made concerning the future. Tom Rodne Report - YAr. . Rodne shoved the total City plane he had marine last March in relation to the current Urban Rencewai studies and :stated that even if we did not continue our work he felt the money expended had been well worth -vhile. He suggeatead that Allan Anderson be loaned to the Planning Commission part -time and do liaison work between the two groups. He then :shoved a tiro chart of progress on the three project areas and stated that the City Center Feasibility work would be completed by the end of this Year . • It was then suMsted that the Housing authority look into different ways of, financing the City rskraare of the Federal Urban Renewal Project. Mr. Anderson was directed to invite the City Center businessmen to attend the Housing Authority meeting of Tuesday, Nove- bee 23, 9965, to a" if there Is any interest on their part to completes Va;e project with Wi fate funds. Air. Anderson stated that the Federal Government rants a policy statement on each of the three project areas and an outline of what we uant to do before they will commit themselves on what can be done. Three its are to be put on the agenda for the meeting of November 17, 9965: A --report from Wyman STA i.th, a report from Robert Van Hoof on his experience on St. Paaul. Private Remw:a.1, and a survey of various ways of financing the three pro; eets . REPOT OF COMITFEE Mrs. Barrow stated that he had not called a meeting of either of his two committees. OLD BUSINRSS - 0. H. DAHLSN PRINTING CC UMM BILL A copy of the letter from 0. R. Dahlen Printing Company explaining the extra charges on their bill was read. Mr. Barrow made ad motion that the bill be paid. Mrs. Mullin seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passed unanimously. AWOURMM As there vas no further business, Mr. Meyer made a motion that the meeting be adjourned at 10:35 P.M. Inc. KQnc3a12 seconded. Upon a voice vote, them being no a'asys, said motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Lois Mullin, Secretary FMLEY K=r= & RMEV=FNW AtlIMITY n u FRIDLEY EMING AND REDEVELOFMM ADTHORITY Mmum - NOVEMBER 17, 1965 The meeting vacs called to order at 8:25 P.M. ROLE Present: Chairmen Richard Herder, Commissioners John Meyer and Robert Kendall and Executive Director Allan Anderson. V18itors: Tom Hodne and Dave Alberta of Hodne Associates. r'sent: Commissioners Paul Barrow and Lois Muuilin APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MEETING OF NOVEMBER 10, 1265 Mr. Meyer made a notion that the minutes of the meeting of November 10, 1965, be approved as received. Mr. Kendall seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passed unanimously. BILLS AND COMMUNICATIONS Uniform Housing Code - A copy of the Uniform Housing Code, 196¢ edition, was given to each Commissioner for review and comments. REPORT OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mr. Anderson read a .letter he had received from Mr. Roger Sandau of the Fridley Jaycees dated 12 November 1965. This letter was in answer to our -request for reasoning behind their public stand against Federal 'Urban Renewal. ROWT OF COMA WESS Wyman Smith Report - Chairman Herder read the statements of Mr. Wymsn Smith on "Opinion on Dissolution" and "Relationship of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley and the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority ". The formal opinions were given in answer to a request made by Chairman Herder at the Housing Authority meeting of November 3, 1965- It was requested that copies of these letters be attached to the minutes of this meeting. Hodne Associates: Reoort - Mr. Hodne stated that they have been working on their report and have some better ideas of other avenues, specifical.sy pisn approaching and financial methods, but Mould like to defer making a detailed report until more research can be made. OLD BUSINESS Mr. Anderson asked for authorization to pay Hodne Associates' bill for the brochure cost. There was some discussion about the bill in relation to the budget. Mr. Meyer then make a motion that we pay Hodne Associates for services rendered on the renewal brochure in the smount of 991y.v5. Mr. gendsll 104 Page 2 n U seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passed unanimously. Mr. Anderson then asked permission to pay Hodne Associates for the work done by Gladstone and Associates stating that the cost could be taken out of the contingency fund. Mr. Kendall made a motion that we pay Hodne Associates the $200 under the assumption that this is an allowable cost on the contingency fund. Mr. Meyer seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passel unanimously. Mr. Meyer made a motion that we pay Hodne Associates for professional services rendered on the City Center Feasibility Study as per our understanding at the meeting of November 9, 1965, in the amount of $2,971• This payment is made prior to the conformation of the amendment to the Feasibility Contract, Minn. R- 55(FS). This advanced payment is authorised in as much as it does not exceed line 4 of he S A P Application by more then 10%. Mr. Kendall seconded the notion. Upon a► voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passed vwanimously. Mr. Hodne stated that Roger Johnson had finished his field work on the addi- tional narrative required for tba City Center documentation and will have the finished report to the Authority by December 1, 1965. SOW As there was no further business, Mr. Kendall made a motion that the meeting be adjourned at 9:05 P.M. Mr. Meyer seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no =aye, said motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted !Allan E. Anderson, Executive Director Fridley Housing do Redevelopment Authority • 1�)E� 0 FRIDLEY HOUSING AND RIDTPELQPMENT AUTHORITY MWING - NOV'B7I = 23, 1965 The meting was called to order at 1 u: Qc: P.M. ROLL CALL Present,, Chairman Richard Herder, Commissioners John Meyer, Paul Barrow, and Lois Mullin, Executive Director Allan Anderson, and Planning Consultant Dave Alberts representing Hodne Associates. Absent: Commissioner Robert Kendall AEMOVAL OF MINUTES - MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 1965 Mr. Meyer made a motion that the minutes of the meeting of 17 November 1965 be approved ds received. Mr. Barrow seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passed unanimously. BILLS AND COMVNICATIONS U. S. Treasury Department - Mr. Anderson stated that be had received a letter from the U. S. Treasury Department questioning our payment of Social Security teases. Chairman Herder requested that this letter be forwarded to Wyman Smith for legal action. Iwaaue_Linao -- Mr. Anderson presented to the Commission the November copy of the League of Women Votere-monthly nffiwa letter, League Lingo, and indicated the portion concerned with the consensus taken on Urbea Renewal at the general meeting of October 19, 1965. R10ECt?TIVB -LMR�ZMRIS RB"pORT After hearing a rumor that Target was interested in building in the City Center area, Mr. Anderson telephoned the Dayton's Corporate Development Group and asked if oonfirmation of this information was available. K* was told that they were not at liberty to make any definite statement but they indicated that they were louking at the northern section of the City for a possible discount store location and asked for any available information on proposed redevelopment in the City Center area. Mr. Anderson was directed to give them any information sae have. OLD BUSRMS X3K R-35(FS) - Mr. Barrow made a motion that the request for the balance of payment on the City Ce..ter R -35 Feasibility Study be submitted to the Federal Government. Mrs. Mullin seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passed unanimously. MINN. R -36(C) -• M". Mullin made a motion that we apply for the additional • $20,000 on the University Avenue, Project R- 36(C). Mr. 1byer seconded the notion. Upon a voice vote, the" being no nays, said motion passed unanimously. 107 MISCELLAMQS The Commissioners discussed at some length the result of the meeting bold earlier the evening of November 23, 9965, with the City Center businessmen. Mr. Meyer stated that, a result of this meeting, he felt an expanded City Center Feasibility Study would be in order and boring and topographic studies should be w e. Air. Barrow replied that he doesn't want to put another cent into the program rather thaw. exploring with agonies on hand the congruity betwaaen the buminesamnle selling price and aa, developer's buying price. Chairman Herder stated that in essence he agreed with Mr. Barrow and felt an expanded feasibility study would to in order to enable us to make a report to the City with a, recoma ailed rezonin3 p1w. and a generalized development pian along with the building documentations we already have on hand. Mr. Barrow stated that he felt we should put a definite hold on Hodne Asso- ciates stopping thew from doirig arq additional work other than that specifi- cally contracted for. He was told that Mr. Hodne hmd verbally ageeed not to do any unnecessary work, at the meeting of November 17, 1965, and could not do anything over and abovo the 823, oW contract without a, prior approved contract amendment. NW BUSINESS Draft of AuthoritXls Statement of Intent to MIA Officials -Air. Herder stated. that he had not yet completed this draft. National Observer -- Chairman Herder presented a clipping from the November issue of 'The National Oba erver' and asked that this be attached to the minutes of the meeting. 'The National Observer' is a weekly, nationally circulated nevzpa- par which is publi abed by Dow Jones, publishers of the Wall Street Jourml. Riverview Heists Residents - Chairman Herder stated that he had received a telephone call from one of the residents of Riverview Heights stating that some of the residents iWi already abandoned their homes and asking what could be donne about their problems. Cheir-man Herder replied that their problem would be first on the agenda for the meeting of December 1, 1965, and asked that all interested ry ai.dents of the area be in attendance. He then directed Mr. Anderoon to invita the City Council members to attend this meting. County Co : zEsioner Michael Baxmon will sit in on this meeting and possibly to rep: ese:ntaadi.ve of the Small Business ,administration As there wa:,,a no further business, Mr. Barrow made a motion that the meeting be adjourned at 11-.UU P.M. Mr. Meyer seconded the motion. 'Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Lois Mullin, Secretary Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority 0 0 Ll LM 108 Riverview ea rr ✓ w�� e� ✓�v :� �7ove d .�4�e� To Lose 1-1 o2nes, j —b V ®te; -s Said No a 1 YRtDIF,Y, MINK. flooding had done to property values , Residents of the Riverview Heights when they applied for home - repair loans. neighborhood of this suburban Minneapolis Some bankers simply wrote "flood" village waited tensely as votes were counted on a recent village election issue. across denied applications. t In the Issue carried, their home, would be !�Ivcrview 116, -hts residents therefore i destroyed and their neighborhood turned welcomed a proposal by the Fridley Hous- i into a park along the Mississippi River. ing and Redevelopment Authority to turn The issue failed, but there was-no joy in the area into a park as an urban - renewal Riverview Heights. project. Homeowners assumed the author- Last spring normal property values in ity would pay them amore for their prop - the neighborhood dropped as the Missis- erty than it would command on the flood - depressed open market. sippi River rose. Lawns and basements were flooded, walls were weakened, fur- Most of the park project would be fi- naces were ruined. Some residents got nanced by Federal money. Fridley would their first clue on what this unexpected. have to put up only 25 per cent of the cost. But Fridley voters, by a three -to -one margin, rejected the project. t �1 Student HOUSlllb— COUTteSy Some Housing and Redevelopment Au- thority members indicated they would ` Of the 1' Il'e Patrol seek another vote in two or three years. r But this was small cheer for - homeown- .4 ASHLAND, ORE. erg like Richard Storla. He recalled that i 'Bulging college campuses across the he used to feel good each time he made nation have sent droves of students into a mortgage payment on the house he has all kinds of temporary housing. But 40 lived in for 13 years. Now he. feels that ! men here at Southern Oregon College be- all his equity in the home went down the ` lieve they may be the first in the country Mississippi last spring,' —PEGGY ALNF3s 494 011"414099 and Rec�euelo�a r i 14"a"4 A* and �n46 &4 of 194AU f 6441 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N. E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 560 -3450 109 Commissioners - AUW"" Director - RICHARD J. HERDER, O wIrmon ALLAN E. ANDERSON PAUL V. BARROW LOIS R. MULLM ROBERT D. KENDALL JOHN E. MEYER November 17, 1965 Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority 6441 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Subject: Opinion on Dissolution Dear Sirs: The Authority is a public body corporate and politic in and for the municipality in which it was organized. • The statutes do not provide for any means of disolution. The Commissioners hold office until their successors have been appointed, and qualified. It would appear that if the City government were to withhold funds and approval of any plan, work, or project of the Authority, that ,refused the Authority after it has exhausted its resources would become inactive, and dormant. _ The only complete dissolution procedure would be by act of the State Legislature. 110 November 179 1965 Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority 6441 University Avenue Northeast Fridley. Minnesota 55421 Subjeott Relationship of the Planning Commission of the City of Fridley and the Fridley Sousing and Redevelopment Authority Y D� ee Sirst The planning Commission of the City of Fridley is created by Chapter 40 O of the Fridley City Code. It serves in an advisory capacity to the City°".~° • Council and management. The code provides that the Planning Commission shall be charged with the responsibility for continuous oommnitY planning D including coordinated subdivision development, development of Wks and playgrounds, maintain up-to -date building codes, study the needs and recommend extensiong installation and improvement of utilities, streets, a street lights, street and traffic signsg and work with commercial and industrial developers in an effort to achieve desirable industrial and commercial growth. The P Commission has specified duties under the Zoning Code (Chapter 45 ) and the Platting Code (Chapter 52 ). Since the Planning Commission is only advisory, its determinations have validity and finality only as long as it has the confidence of the City Council. The City Charter has no reference to the Planning Commission ° but in Sections 8.01 and 8.02 provide for a City Plan and the enforaemint of same by the City Council. The Ni.dley Housing and Redevelopment Authority is a separate political entity created pursuant to the Municipal and Housing Redevelopment Act found at Section 462.411 et sequor of Minnesota Statutes. Its work is inter- related with that of the Planning Commission. It has almost pro - hority for projects in specified are". The prietory power and aut ne activation of any particular project,: however, requires approval of the City Council. It could perform any of the assignments now handled by r. the Planning Commission if so directed by the City Council.,. i w. Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Fridley,Minnesota Page 2 ioveaber 170, 1965 The Authority could act in coordination and in conjunction With the Planning Commission in developing broad overall community plans. The Authority, in developing its project areas could use the Planning Commission as a sounding board or consulting agency for testing the suitability of designs and plans. The powers and duties of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authorit we spelled out in Section 462.445 of Minnesota Statutes. Subdivision 4015 provides as followst "When a local public body does not have a planning agency or when a oomprehensive or general community development plan or plans is or are not already available by the planning agency, to mks or cause to be made such plans as a guide in the note detailed planning of Lansing and redevelopment areas." rM ,.In conclusions the Housing Authority and the Planning Commission each Lave speciflo, separate assigned duties and functions. BOA ultimately is .•«• dependent upon the support and desires of the go ernhat body of UW ,Guy:., . ` There is nub Opportunity for coordiarted effort. Ofours truly, Wpm Sidth p Attorney fore ? M vs /rp I1 -` _y , 1iti STATE OF MINNESOTA I\ DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ST. PAUL, MINN. 55101 F October 250 1965 r Mr. E. J. Iundheim Anoka County Engineer Anoka, Minnesota.55343 Re: SAP o2- 6o6•(CsAH 6) Mississippi Street .Storm Sewer in Fridley 3-4753 Dear Mr. Iundheim: In replay to your recent request for technical assistance, we have prepared design calculations for the sizing of a storm sewer system for Mississippi Street (CSAH 6) between T.H. 47 and T.\i. 65 in Fridley. • We are returning to you the drai.nage.area map which you supplied for our use. We are also enclosing a copy of our calculations to convenience you in preparing the,detailed construction plan.` We are sorry that we were unable to include invert elevations for the proposed design, but will be glad to work with you in this regard as soon as the street grade is known and the inverts of the'inplace storm drain facilities are known. We have made a preliminary cost proration of the proposed work.and find that State -Lid funds can bear approximately 65 to 70% of roughly a $35,000 improvement. We will be pleased to make a final review and an accurate Bost proration when detailed plans are available. If we can be of further help, please feel free to call. Sincerely, y� F. J. Ia~sn Ibrdraulics Engineer Attaciments (3 ) Area Map (1) • Calculations (2) g • 0 M E M 0 November 24, 1965 TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager FROM: Marvin C. Brunsell, Finance Director SUBJECT: Prorating of sewer charges for tornado destroyed business establishments. The City Couacil previously had authorized prorating of the minin= sever and water charges for homes that were destroyed by the tornado. We now ho we a request. from the owner of one of the trailer parks to prorate the sever charges is the trailer park for the period eons of the lots were not occupied because of the tornado. This situation was not really eowered in the original memo and subsequent Council action.. The cost to the City in this instance if the charges were prorated for a portion of the quarter would be $223.00. 112 I1G Fridley Parks and Recreation Department Fridley, Minnesota Dear Sirs: As you are well aware the Fridley Jaycees are currently constructing a hockey rink and warming house at Commons Park. Our original estimate for building the rink alone was $1050. Since the original estimate we were very fortunate in obtaining a warming house which is nearly completed, but our expenses have exceeded $2,200 for the rink and house. Our original plan also included lights for the above mentioned rink. These lights were to be donated by Northern States Power (formerly used as street lights). We have since been informed that these lights would not be adequate for our rink. We have secured a bid from Bacon Electric to install \ proper lighting for the rink and warming house at a cost of $1,393. We are asking the Parks • and Recreation Department to finance $472 of the $1093 for lighting. The Fridley Jaycees are in a position through donated time and materials and projected income to pay the remaining $921. The Parks and Recreation Departments share ($472) would include 16 light fixtures @ $25 each and 16 - 500 watt bulbs $4.00 each. Lighting of the rink and warming house would insure the citizens of Fridley of having a•first class hockey facility, which we believe will be second to none in our surrounding area.. The Fridley Jaycees thank you for your cooperation with us-in the past, especially Paul Brown and we hope you will continue to help us with our rink. Awaiting you reply. Sine rely, Roger Sandau President, Fridley Jaycees 7361 Melody Drive Fridley, Minnesota 55432 V w STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT S ROSS NO. LILAC DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55422 November 26, 1965 City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota Atten: Mr. Earl P. Wagner City Manager S.P. 0207- - T.H. 65 - In Fridley Gentlemen: Your request for a connection between the frontage roads and a cross- over at 61st Avenue N.E. has been considered by this office. You are no doubt aware that eventually T.H. 65 is to be upgraded to a high type expressway,if not to a full freeway standard. For that reason we are very hesitant to allow any additional cross -overs north of Interstate 694. Your letter also mentions a request for unconditional continuance of the present crossing at 63rd Avenue N.E. We agree that your proposed relocation and municipal state aid designation of a road from 61st Avenue N.E. at Central Avenue northeasterly to Rice Creek Road at Old Central Avenue, is an excellent proposal. This will provide you with a thru east -west road northerly of Moore Lake all the way from the East River Road to the East county line. During the 1966 construction season we-propose to construct the connection and cross -over at 61st Avenue N.E. as requested in your letter. The prox- imity of the 63rd avenue N.E. crossing is of great concern to us from a traffic safety standpoint, however, it will not be necessary to close this cross -over at this time. I am sure you are•aware that any additional signalization on T.H. 65 in this area such as a future signal at our proposed new cross -over area, would require closing the median but not the frontage road connection at 63rd. The signals along this section of T.H. 65 would then be inter - connected for maximum traffic efficiency. Sincerely, R. P. Braun • Deputy District Engineer a 11'7 • K Meetings Second Tuesday and Last Thursday of Each Month iftniqhts ofTolumbus BLESSED VIRGIN MARY COUNCIL, No. 4381 958 43rd Avenue N. E. Columbia Heights 21, Minnesota NOVEMBER 129 1965 To the Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley This is to advise you that, assuming the City has no objection, we intend to conduct a bingo game 6knthe K of C Hall, 6831 Highway 65, N.E., commencing February 7, 1966. This game would be conducted twice each week thereafter on Sundays from 1;30 to 5 :30 P.M. and Thursdays from 7 :30 to 11 :30 P,M, THANK You for lour consideration in this matter. TH SHEEHAN KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA" 4 118 :1 JOHN M. YENCHO Financial Swetary r. Location APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT r Permit No* aFridley, Minn* v 19 FRIDLEY INSPECTOR OF BIIILDINf3.S: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein specs- fied, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances -and rul- ings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and re- presentations stated in this application are true and correct. Owner Kind of Building • Used as Work to be completed about 19_...� Estimated Cost _ DESCRIPTION How Installed: Flatwise on Extended out from Wall Roof Dimensions: Length p ,Height Thickness S'f r Distance from Sidewalk 4��f� // _Roof Constructed of: Iron, Wood, Iron and Wood Illuminated Wiring Application No. 0 Sf 113 • CLAIMS 0 Genwal aril Public Utilities 7229 through 7328 8012 through 8078 1`0 ESTI TES FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY CODHCYL - DEC ER 6® 1965 Karl Dedolph Construction Company 771 West Seventh Street Sto Paula Minnesota water iraveWe1W t Project Noe 7S -B -`Booster statue: - 63rd Avenue U.N. & TeHo #100) (FINAL) $ 2,341075 Keys Well DCilliog C=WMW 413 Borth Lexington Parkway St a Paul, 55104 Water IWcava I sit Project Ito. 75 -A 4"wee a ltiawd drift wells) (PARTIAL) $ 7o645,27 0 V 0 121 COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. Consulting Engineers 1446 County Road 91J" Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 November 18, 1965 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Fridley C/o Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager 6431 University Avenue, N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421 Gentlemen: CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We submit herewith Estimate #4, the final estimate, for Karl Dedolph Construction Co., 771 West Seventh Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, for work completed for construction of Water Improvement Project 75 -B according to contract. Total Lump Sum $16,150.00 • Additions or Deductions None Amount Earned to Date $16,150.00 Less: Estimate No. 1 $ 69435.00 Estimate No. 2 4,702.50 Estimate No. 3 2,670.75 Total Paid to Date $13,808.25 13,808.0 AMOUNT NOW DUE. . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,341.15 We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Water Im- provement Project 75 -B , and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. We recommend that final pay- ment be made upon acceptance by your Honorable Body, and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on the date listed above. Respectfully submitted, COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. By e5fe 0 • E. V. Comstock, P. E. EVC /cb cc: Karl Dedolph Construction Co. 121, ) LIST OF CONTRACTORS LICENSES To BE APPROVED By COUNM • DECEMBER 62 1965 E ACTRICAL Gombold Electric, Inc. 725 West 7th Street St. Paul, Minnesota by: W. Z. Ccmbold RBNEWA�. fPMgfesd Electric Corp, 737 France Avenue North Minneapolis, Minn. 55422 by: H. E. Fraser RENEWAL EXCAVATING Van Hendrickson Excay. Co. 4444 • 4th St. N. E. Minneapolis, Minnesota bys Vendell Hendrickson NEW Quality Sewer Service 376 E. County Road F St. Paul. Minnesota bys Ronald Deslauries NEW GAS SERVICES Belden Porter Company 315 Royalston Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota byo William C. Porter RENEWAL • GOAL COIITR C RS Steve Hawrysh 266 Mercury Drive N, E. Fridley, Minn. 55432 bys Steve Hawrysh RENEWAL Mar -!ay Construction, Inc. 7301 Noble North Minneapolis 29, Minnesota by: James Bo Schutt NU Joseph E. Moen 3239 - 4th St. N. R. Minneapolis, Minn. bys Joseph RIO Moen NEW J. 1. Paulson Bldrs, Inc. 320 North Edpewood Avenue golden Valley 27, Minn, by: J. R. Paulson NEW Stedt Construction Company 2508 - 13th Avenue North Sto Paul, Minnesota bys Dean Stedt NEW MASONRY - Hydrot6u Systow, Inc. 1937'IIniversity Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota bys Jaws A. Slults law Jamison Brothers, Inc. 8427 Center Drive • Minseapolis, Him. 55432 bys Duane Jamison RMUrAM Sharp Concrete Construction River Oaks, Route 1 084609 Minnesota bys Dennis L, Sharp NEW • 0 LIST ONE MULTIPLE DWgILIMS TO BE LICENSED AND APPROVED By THE CITY COUNCIL D�C8M 6-, 1965 1965 -66 Period NAME b ADDRESS -Ma ADDRESS OF APT. BLDGo APT, UNITS FEB PAID A & C Enterprises Pine Tree Lake Road White Bear Lake 10, Minn. Ralph Anderson 4537 York Avenw North Minneapolis, Minnesota Fridley Apartments 6300 Baker Averame N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Steve Hawrysh 266 Mercury Drive N. g. Fridley, Minn. 55421 Stew Rawrysh 266 Mercury Drive N. E. Fridley, Mimmacta 55421 5701 Highway #65 Fridlay, Minn. 55421 (A. Ceara) 5901 - 24 St. N. Z. Fridley, Minn. 55421 6341 -43 Highway #65 Fridley, Minn. 55421 NO. H. Cottwaldt) 195 Mercury Drive N.B. Fridley, Minn. 55421 110 - 61st Avenue N. g. Fridley, Minn. 55421 Hoglund Plumbing 6 Heating 7420 West Lake Street 5400 - 5th Street N. 8. St. Louis Park, Minn. Fridley, Minn. 55421 Hoglund Plumbing A Heating 7420 West Lake Street 5410 - Sth Street iN.g. St. Louis Park, Minn. Fridley, Minn. 55421 Ilated- aermian 854 Midland Bank Bldg. Mim "polis, Minnesota Robert Lacy 4721 Nieollet Avenue Mimneapolis, Minnesota 5980 - 3rd Street N. E, Fridley® Minn. 55421 140 Mississippi Place Fridlay, Mims, 55421 Lyndele Decorating Co"eany (Meiovoms A. Biddle) 4800 Cedar Lake Road 211 - 79th Way N. 8. Minneapolis, Hiwnesota Fridlay, Minn. 55432 Morris Ovick 81 Rica Creek Why Fridley, Mireoes ota 55432 5419 4th St. N. 8. Fridley, Minn. 55421 Parlor Campsny (James J. Parson) • 1675 Grand Avemm 361 - 74th Avenue X. E, St. Paul, Minnesota Fridley. Minnesota 55432 32 $32.00 4 10.00 10 20 7 4 4 4 4 8 4 a 10.00 20.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10,00 10.00 10.00 10.00 124 0 jH&T.IPLB DWSB.B.I&LICUSBS LC_ON_UD) PAWS 2. 1%5 -66 Willard L. Peterson 4455 Reservoir Blvd. 5830 - 2nd Street x. B. 10.00 M1m *apolis * Minn. 55421 Fridley, Minnesota 55421 4 Drew L. Scherer 6525 - 2ad St. N.g. 6525 - 2nd Street A. B. Fridley* Mina. 55421 Fridley., Minnesota 55432 7 10.00 Richard Torgeson 278 - 58th Ave. X. 8. 6061 -3rd Street N. E. Fridley, Minn. 55421 Fridley* Minn. 55421 3 10.00 s • o m • m o m s o • m e e o o -• o m o o m o o • o o m m m o m • - m • • NXTIPL$ DWBLL N LICENSES m PSRIOD 9/1/64 m 1/1/65 Hy its aft t 1834 South Oregon 4917 - 3rd Street N. 8. • Minneapolis, Mien. Fridley. Minn. 55421 7 10.00 I0 126 32-1965 November .29, 1965 Street surfacing & curbs (concrete) without storm sewer Ironton Street, from Riverview Terrace to East River Road 0 0 40 u ,:.:.31965 November 30, 1965 12'7 Against Street Project 1966 -1 Property abutting, facing, adjoining Hugo Street Riverview Heights r� l 5fE'C P07 Z14(,� 0 November 30, 1965 Against Street Project 1966 -1 adjoining Iron Street in Rive: 1 L K] 123 - Property abutting, facing_ rview Heights Addition / 5C, C, 0 tv4i 40 4 SO I - d 7Z I -vR S. 13 21 4`113 T:, 190 �3�21 I 40 1 0164* j�44� AO 9 su�. 14 N3, 22 AUDP 1091 z"? N0 10 15 REV N*Fs 73 Z if 3? col 50 T, 370 -17 .24 \14 �3f-� 46-4� V.1 ll�Y.2 30 40 13 8, 21 30 33 ItY 3'34io� 14, , aj 15, 14 31 70 34& \3 ;,441* zy FO 30 W. //4 C SEC. 3 ..................... 29 332 tAIL- A-1 , I . I I , \ /, fO .9 IV", 39 Myf .4 m I • a 560 -3450 (:it Cy o{ rdley ANOKA COUNTY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 TO: City Council DATE: November 30, 1965 % City Manager SUBJECT: Hourly rates based on 8 hr days for FROM: Paul Brown, Director 60 working days both for personnel Parks and Recreation and equipment as per bids. Department P ffiSONAL SERVICES A A A 2 services not accounted for Mpls Tree 2 services not accounted for Park Const. Parkway Tree Svc Ford Cons. Minn Tree Northland Svc. Walsh Tree Svc. EQUIPMENT SERVICES A A A 3 services not accounted for Mpls Tree 4 services not accounted for Park Const., Parkway Tree Svc Ford Const. Based on a 70% cut of total work delivered. Total share of working man houre 06 hours. $22.00 - $7092.00 10.25 - 3,444.00 21.50 - 71224.00 15.45 = 5,191.20 15,55 - 50224.80 19.25 - 60468.00 Based on a 30,E cut of total work delivered. Total share of working man hours 144•hours. $52.50 - $7,560.00 44.00 - 6.336.00 48.00 - 69912.00 132 Minn Tree $43.35 ' $6,242.40 Northland Svc 39.15 5,637.60 Walsh Tree Svc 36.00 - 5,184600 Grand Totals: A A A Mpls Tree Park Const. $149952.00 Parkway Tree Svc 9.780.00 Ford Const. 14.136.00 Minn Tree 11.433.60 Northland Svc. 10,862.40 Walsh Tree Svc. ]1,652,00 1 It 133 hi ,a Cif Cy of r i alle 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE TO: City Council c/o City Manager ANOKA COUNTY 560.3450 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 DATE: November 22, 1965 134 SUBJECT: Hourly rates of personal services plus FROM: Paul Brown, Director equipment of bidders for Locke Park Tree Parks and Recreation Removal Project. Department A A Mpls Park Park Ford Minn North Walsh PERSONAL SERVICES A Tree Cons. way Cons. Tree land Tree Foreman - Supervisor 7.50 n/a Chain Saw w /oper. 7.50 5.00 Laborer n/a 3.50 Tree Trimmer n/a n/a EQUIPMENT Five Yd Truck w /dr. 7.50 n/a Stump Cutter w /oper. n/a n/a Boom Truck w /dr. n/a n/a Winch Truck w /oper. 7.50 7.50 Tractor w /oper. n/a n/a CAT or TRAOTOR n /a= Not Available 6.45 3.00 5.55 } 2.50 4.45 1.75 5.55 3.00 8.00 11.50 8.50 9.5o 15.00 17.50 5.00 4.25 4.45 5.00 5.00 4.35 3.95 5.25 4.50 2.90 3.20 4.50 7.00 3.95 3.95 4.50 7.00 6.00 10.00 12.00 7.00 8.00 7.00 8.00 13.00 14.00 5.40 3.50 7.00 17.50 15.00 12.00 5.75 4.00 5.75 4.65 4.00 8.95 16.00 9.00 Further information as per request of Council in regards to Locke Park Tree Removal Project, page 24 of minutes, meeting of October 18, 1965. Additional help was obtained from the State of Minnesota, Department of Conservation, the Cooperative Extension Service, with addtional help from Dr.-C.G. Hard. University of Minnesota. Minnesota Tree and Northland Tree Service were recommended as bidders for this project by Dr. Hard. Bids were obtained from both of these companies. 11 r� LJ 135 PI EriMIT MMMW OF PRA SUB -C MIM MID RECREATION COMSSION • Helen Sampson (Pa='ks b Playgrounds s�- eooastteNr member) Ind . fiaitea Gordon Sangster (school Board Moeber) Indeflu to Althowh the ordinance stipulates that only ooze term d all expire each year,, it is iegpossible to do this. I, theoref wow Suggest the following: 1 for Town DeC =bw Terms f.arkz,-Sub-cqgggt.tee Expires Rmeation 999 "MUM in Mi s 31, Robert J. Hughes, _ 1 for John Dunphy* Chad-nun December Chairman 12 -31 -67 (Council Appointee) 3.2.31 -65 Thowas D, Codwan 12 -31-67 Alex Kurak 1 for tern expiring December (Council A,ppoiritee) 12 -31-" Helen Sampson 12 -31-65 johnn Johnson Christian 3kjarvold 12- 31-66 (School Board Appointee) 12- 31.65 Richard Donlin 12 -31.66 Jackie gward (school Board Appointee) 1231 -66 John C, Wright (Council ) IndefiAit* • Helen Sampson (Pa='ks b Playgrounds s�- eooastteNr member) Ind . fiaitea Gordon Sangster (school Board Moeber) Indeflu to Althowh the ordinance stipulates that only ooze term d all expire each year,, it is iegpossible to do this. I, theoref wow Suggest the following: 1 for teorm expiring DeC =bw 31, 1968 1 for erm t oxpiring Decesabez 31, 1968 1 for term expiring December 310 1967 1 far term expiring DeCsubebc 31,, 1967 1 for tern expiring December 31. 1966 • U x ORDINANCE # 314 13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE RELATING TO '.THE ORGANIZATION, POWER, AND AUTHOR_- ITY OF THE CITY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION. "+ The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Section 1. That various sections of Chapter 24 of the Fridley City Code be amended as follows: Section 24.01 CREATION. There is hereby created a Parks and Recreation Commission for the City of Fridley. The commission shall consist of five Fridley residents, appointed by the City Council. The Commission Chairman shall be appointed by the City Council and shall also serve as a member of the Planning Commission. The initial members shall be appointed for staggered terms, so that the term of no more than one would conclude in any year. Thereafter, the members shall be appointed for terms of three years. Both original and successive appointees shall serve until their successors are appointed and qualified. A vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired portion of the term by the City Council. Members of the commission shall serve without compensa- ti©n and shall not b@ personally intmeted in any Gontram sf tho commission. They shall at the beginning of each year select a vice - chairman and a secretary from their''own number with duties in addition to commission membership implied by these titles. A majority shall con- stitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Section 24.02 SCOPE. The Parks and Recreation commission shall ad- vise the City Manager and Council on operation of a program of parks, 11 11 u is 137 �f APPOINTMENTS FOR CONSENT AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 6, 1063 NAME POSITION SALARY REPLACES Rene Kreutter Senior Engineering $520.00 Alex Rudzinski 2265 Knoll Drive Aide New Brighton, Minn. 55112 James E. Angelo 1354 7th St. N.W. Apt. 14 New Brighton, Minn. 55112 Junior Engineering Aide $435.00 Temporary Employee O A $�4 Pago Cd Cd Cd cd a C.) H r-I C4 r+ r- lc� r-I cu lz ca bo cd bo Cs bo ad bo cd boo bocdcd Cd lz Cd Cd bo Cd bo Cd 60 C( P, .,q PL. PL. co P. V) rl. c) P. co P.. co P. V) P-. N P., P. 4. V) 4, ..rj) 0- --Q) tto 10 r-I r-i r-I C\j r-I 06 r-I r-4 r-I M r-I CY r-I H r 4 -4 r-I en r-I r-4 H r q C\1 H A (D 14 00 a a lz Cd 4-) :4-) — 1 .4-:1 PL4 PL4 Cd cd 'cc 0 OD 0 (D bo Cd bo cd bo id bo ad cd C6 as a W -(Z bo co bo Cd bo cd bo a Cd $:14 0 V) PL4 V) PL4 U) PA Ca PL4 pq PL4 P4 la. V) 44 V) 4, V) pl, P-4 ca 13- M ct�j H'N H Ok 4JI -P '445) W (D A 4-) 4-) - 34 0 0) Cd Cd a :� 9.4 V4 rl PLI a a) (D 0 bo (d as Cd Cd 'id bo Cd Cd Cd Cd CC bo Cd bO W bO,cd ad bO cd bO cc COP, P-i PL. li 44- V) N P�. P4 ' PL4 P- 0) fl� V) P�4 co P. P., co (14 V) A. sum, H* en H en 1-1 H H H N H N CU H IN H cl 0 J:4 "° Q A A a A A tag A A a 7-4 4 10 'IN 4J -P 4-) 0 4-) 4-.') cis ` as a� cd Cd Cd Cd Cd cz P-4 114 P4 Aq PL4 PLO ,,D bO . H H H 0) 4..) Z 0 -rq 4) bO W :t cd cd cd cd bO cd bO W bO cd W bo Cd bo Cd Cd W cd bo cd 0 Cn P- P'- 04 P4 A- V) PLI CO A. CO P-. V) $I.\ CO P-. 0 P-1 Al V) A. 0) P-4 0 r4 r-4 :Ikr4 -'t,4-4 r4 r• r4t-'� r4 e e4 N r-4 N r-4 M N r-4 M r4 0" aS CS b'1 P, •rq Cd Cd rq SLI H Q 4-)l A Q Q 0 aj Cd 4-� V4 >b V) P-4 C14 CL4 Cd :::I -H .-H P-4 0 cd r-I H r-i H 004.3 43 43- -P P 43 -P 4-� -�l -P 4) 4.1 4`2 4 43 4.) 4J, S�4 0 0 bo lz botd 1z, bO ad bo Cd bo lz cd bo Cd bo Cd bo Cd Cd od. ad ad 1 . a) a4 V)I;L4A4 = co —w .1 P, V) P� P6, ca P4 V) CL4 V) P4 NP. C14 44 ad 0 -P P-4 tO 0 0 (D 0 0 71 z Cd Az uj > N P. Cd (D 0 �IP4•) •as 4.'): 4-) 43 -P 4-3 -P -P 43 -P 4.') 4-D 4.1 .0 :P 41 -P 4.1 0 0 "-1 z Fi bO ad. 4,�434.�,• bdjd Cd . Cd bo Cd ad bo cd cd bo W bo cd Cd w 03 co 4-*) U CO (X4 '.'b W(d YP4X. 0 N V) PL4 P4 ca P, P- via via N PA PL, PLI (D Cd . (�� W 0 Ja lz V) $Z 1 Q) -H to 4-) -P -P 4-3P 4410 4-) 4-) 43 4AP-P 43 -P 4.) �> 0.1, bo Cd boLOC6 bWfd ad. CU 43 4.3 4_11 4_3 4.) 4.�, 43 bop bW Cd bo _�3 Cd Cd Cd Cd .4-) -H Cd 10 V) PL4 a) P_CL4 OXI.4]L, , A4' Al bo Cd W Cd bo Cd Cd a) Cd a U114!). 0) Cd J:L4 P. P.. P.4 H bo 10 . I V) P64 V) N co A4 CLI PAPA a A- r In t", tv tl :Z i � a -,., , :. / i t 1:'r nt ; 1 t � � �� ? �� tMj ., ' � i y . * f r. ,, 4 F , X i - X y,, � ,. �•�' r ...f ' � � # ` � "' f '� � �tt 1 '%t a� �:r�lr t- :.w ' �.a.a K . >, .; o �. •_ ,.:, ,�� ;�: ,•� ,, t a, � � !�� < � it � , ,_r .. � �� ;�. , ,��" ,� x U U cc at •rl 6fl ad 6U cd dO cd •r•I bW-r♦ WO 6O•rl ad "I ad -H ad -4 60 Cd 6O c6 ^' P,U co A, V]a.�V)4 .0 ,V�U v Q• co V] U W UaU -V) P. •�rl � ° ri rl H cV r►•f H.H r-4 r- ir`r1r-1 r-1 H H MH H H H H N . ; , U + A bo /�''I a a a A A a A a o -P ' i •D •D 1 �' V •rl •rl •r I .r{ P • a� ,� • • • `� .00 r-1 A A rUi rUi rU-I rU-I 4.1 43 43 -P � 4 a -P -P 43 �' 43 43 43.E +�M" dO 6H bo ad 60 Cd 60 as •rl ai•r+ 6o ad 6O ad 6o of cd 60 ad 60 at •d .. ; ., ' CO U V)a.vOa,CO " wU U V)w a, CO P-4 V)wVla. mti r•I r*-4 H r-1 cr r-I r-! H ri H M rd r•i r-I N H N a, O H ¢" �`. 0 A , A r,A m -P a a a D A a A .° U H U ° A JJU JU r-I 1 rA A A A r-1 o x P 13 -P +3 4-) 434-3 33 4 s. O E,, +� +3 D 43, D 43 d.1 y 4-3 60 at 6D ad 6O co 6O cd 6O cd m .� +� ! 60 of •r4 as •r+ 4o cd -H (d a P 4 � a va w rn a a.., , r c P-4 U P64 0 C/I 0 wU a 4a a, N N r-4 r-I rl N r-4 N r♦ , M r-I M r- t ° v a t a a D •r4 a -H A t> a -H A t> O -H b �. ., od U U -rI U -H zF " H r-4 ri m ai f4 7 Ei y 40 ` +1D+),P43 :• ad•H ad •� 43 6o of ' ' D 6L*H Wo � � a3 +� 6o ad .P YO ad 43 -P 60 ad 43 � 6o cd -P 4 6o cd m 0; (D ad o to w U w U a) w w w. a Vi as en w V) 4 m +� r♦ rf rl H r-I N N r-1 ri rt rl CC S:4 R. W N. A r ti f� s~ rd 10 1 1 a e < < A < . "1 m O •r i �' .� .� . . � a 4 m H " ° r• U U U •� 'd • ri U q A a�dN,� • ' i rya Q.. P, 60 at,. 60 60 al of 6 O-4 bow 6o ad 6o cd �0 a7 6o . rl of •rl . A O co w V)aa, DOP4 UV)a. wa a a 0 U04 94 . H 4 r-I r-1 HCV H r-1 H M m H H rl tr Rf +3 . o ,3 in uj c ca U U U U0�� i A H r-i ri A A S~ m S'-, (X F• do W, 6o bo cd ad 6o alri bOcd 6o a3 W cd 6o cd 60 a! •r•1 aJ •r l � CO a C a a s 10 aU COP-4 v1 a V) a a V) a. U w U o, •, , �, r-I rl r-I r-I N-i r-I N H H r-I M M r-I H r-I m ,,, . • A A A � O.0 ; N A A A J A ca ri Q rU-1 r rU-I A• ri Q D, 43 d� r, � P43 -P J> 43 4J 44� -P 4 a 43 -P -P 4- 43 43 1 A '� O U O O o C 6o ad •rl 6O 6Ocd cd •rl 6o d -0'Ocd 6O cd •ri 6O ad bO of 6o A ad •r+ ad •rl 0 `� M 0) wUv) VOWa U CO V)a. CO aU V) a. (1) P4 V)U aU U m W .. •• ch r-I r-1 r 1 r-4 ri r-1 H C.%H rl H H H r q M H M r'I H .� rl H A u.0 t` rA u o U ° c> o i Ll ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 46.01 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE SO AS TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 1964 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (VOLUME 1) PUBLISHED BY THE INTER.-, NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS. The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 46.01 of the City Code of Fridley is here- by amended by striking from said Section the reference to the 1961 edition of the Uniform BuilLding Code and in lieu thereof, inserting and including the 1964 edition of the Uniform Building Code (Volume 1), published by the International Conference of Building Officials. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, this day of December, 1965. ATTEST: Marvin C. Brunsell, City Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Published: William J. Nee, Mayor 140 141 is November 15, 1965 MSMO TO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Marvin Co Brunsell, Finance Director SUBJECT: Temporary Bonds for Street Improvemenat Project Noo 1965 -1 and 1965 -2 in the smount of $150,000.00 1%5 -1 covers the City street prograM for 1965- The contract wss let on March 150 1965 and the estimated cost of the 1965 -1 Street Project is $174,0000000 1965 -2 covers the State Aid Streets. The contract was let for these on February 15, 19658 No bonds have been issued for this construction previously. Although some money has been received from the State for State Aid Streets* The Regular Special Assessment Fund does have available temporarily money • for ianreestment in bonds which will not be needed for other purposes prior to the expiration date of these bonds. Permanent Bonds will not be anecessaxy during 1965. RESOLUTION NO, . A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT BONDS IN ACCORDANCE WM LAWS OF 19579 CHAPTER 3850 BE IT RESOLVED By the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka Coun , Minnesota, as follows SEC. 1. The total estimated cost of Street Eprovement Protect Noe 1965-1 has been estimated in e=ess of $174,000.00 SEC. 20 It is now estimated that the sue of $150,000 is currently necessary to provide financing of the projects above noted, and it is hereby determined to be necessary to borrow said amount for the payment of obligations now incurred and for expenses necessarily in- curred in connection with the construction of said improvement project., SEC. 3. There is htr:aby created StreetIpramement Ng. 1965 -1 Fund ,(TaRQmM) which shall contain a ag"tawtion account as a gat thereof iinto which shall be paid all proceeds of temporary bonds issued pursuant to this resolution and similar subsequent resolutions, and out of which shall be paid all amounts due and payable as costs or expenses Incident to or incurred in connection with the making of said improve- meats. SEC. 4_ There is also hereby created in Street Taproyement No. 1965- .1.Fumd (temoorarv) a Sinkina Fund Account which account in said fund may and shall be termed as the Sinking Funcl� into which fund shall be paid the proceeds of all special assessments levied against benefited property by reason of the making of said improvements as well as all other monies therein to be paid as provided by law and out of which shall be paid the principal and interest an all temporary improvement bonds issued to finance said project. 0 SEC. 50 It is hereby detemined that the sume of $150,000.00 shall be borrowed to finance ai .Street Improvement Project No. 1965 -1 with I�espW,t to costs of c qu—tur ion and cases necessarily incussred ` relatwe thereto totrhis date, by the issuance of temporary imprWe- • meat bonds of the City of Fridley as autehortzed in Mimosa&& Statutes, Seca 429.01, Subdivision 3, as amended by saws 1957, Chapter 385. SEC. b. Said bonds shall be payable fTm the Sinking Fund of the following: Street Improwement Project Noy 1965 -1 Fund but the City further recoupiae tta duty under the law, as pravided by Sec. 429.091, and covenants and agrees with purchaser and all holders from time to time, of said temporary improvement bonds, at or prior to the maturity thereof that it will pay and retire such bonds and the interest thereon out of the proceeds of definitive improvement bonds which the Council shall issue and sell at or prior to the maturity of the temporary imprwoment bonds, to the extent that the same cannot be paid out of funds available in the Sinking Fund of Street lmprowemen t No 1965 -1 Fund or out of other municipal funds which are properly available and • are appropriated by the Council for such purpose. Sm. F. It is hereby determined to levy special assessments against benefited property by reason of the making of Street Emravement Project No. 1965 -1 and to levy ad valorem takes, if necessaays to produce suns at least 5% in excess of the amounts sufficient to pay principal and interest when due on said temporary improvement bonds and on any definitive bonds to be issued as herein provided, such special assess- ments to be placed on the tax rolls at such time when said imprmement projects ha®e been completed or the total cost thereof has been determined. SEC. Said temporary impro®ement bonds in the amount of $1509000.00 shall be denominated Streets Inrayement Project No. 1965 -1 Bond Series "A" (temporary) shall be thirty (30) in number and numbered from 1 • to 30 inclusive, each in the dow nitnation of $5,000.00, shall bear interest at the rate of 44% per annum, payable semi - annually on may 15th and Narember Wth, of each -,ear mind shall mature or. I+ ti Ms'— 15„ 1%11 144 #hall be subject to redemption and pre - payment an air interest payment • date, at par and accrued interest. Not less than 30 days before the date specified for redemption of said ids, the Cites Treasurer shall mail notice of the call thereof to the holder, if known, said Treasurer shall maintain a record of the names and addresses of the holders of said bonds insofar as such information is made smailable to him by the holders thereof, for the purpose of mailing said notices The principal and all interest on said bonds shall be pa39able at Ridley Ci_► Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E. Minneapolis 21, Minnesota. SEC. 90 Said temporary improvement bonds shall have attached thereto an interest coupon which Bond and Coupon shall be substantially in the following forso (Form of Ceupou) NO. $ is (unless the bond described below is called for earlier redemption) On the day of , 19 , the of , Minnesota, the sum of DOLLAU Lawful money of the United States of America for interest then due on its 0 Dated o Manager Mayor SEC. 10„ Said bonds and coupons attached shall be prepared under the direction of the City Manager and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and Manager, and the corporate seal of the City shall be affixed thereto, and the appurtenant interest coupon . shall be mimeographed and authenticated, by the printed, eagrwed, lithographed, or facsimile signatures of said Mayor and Manggetr. When 14 said fonds hime been a %eeuted and authenticated the? shall be deli,�ezred by the Treasurer to the purchaser thereof. upon payment of the purchase • price heretofore agreed upon and accrued interest to date of delivery and r.aid purchaser shall not be obliged to see to the application thereof. SEC___ -_ 11'. The City Manages is hereby authorized and directed to file a coxtifted copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Anoka County, together with such other information as he shall require and to oktain from said County Auditor a certificate that said bonds have been entered on this bond register. SEC, 12. The Bond issued hereunder shall be payable from Street lReoyement No. 1965 -1 Fund which is hereby created. The Treasurer shall cats ;e all monies received from the process of said bonds, all monies ap,)ropriated and transferred from other funds and all special assess - rants for the improvements provided that if any payment of principal or interest shall become due when there is not sufficient money in 0 said fund to pay the same, the Treasurer shall pair such principal or interest from the general fund of the City and such fund shall be reimbursed for such advances out of monies to be credited to said fund when said monies are collected. All proceeds for said bonds ezeept Accrued interest shall be - credited to the fund and used to pay the cost of said impara*ementsq SEC. 13. it is further prodded that should it appear at any time that the monies credited to said fund and provided for the payment of principal or interest on the bonds when the sums become due are not sufficient to pay the same, that then the City stall issue further definitive imptowament bonds as authorised and provided in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sec. 429.091, Chapter 475, and that the proceeds of said furttheT definitive bonds shall be first used to pay tht principal • and interest as is than due and to redeem the temporagy bonds issued hereunder. 146 SEC o 14. The Cif Council has determined that not less ithan eighty per cent (80X) of the total cost of said improsements will be paid by special assessments to be le✓ied agaiu mt every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by the said improvements.. The City hereby eowenants and agrees that it will do and perform, as soon as they can be done, all acts and things necessary for the final and valid levy of such special assessments, and in the event that any such assessments be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity, or in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken by the Councilor any of the City Officers or employees, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City and this Council will forthwith do all such further proceedings as may be required by law to make such assessments valid and binding liens • against such property, and also shall take such further proceedings as may be required by law to provide monies for the payment of. principal and interest as the same fall due on the bonds issued here - undetg and to provide for the redemption of the same. SECS 150 It is hereby determined that the collection of spa cial assess- ments and the proceeds of monies appropriated and transferred from other funds is and will be in an amount of at least five per cent (5�� in excess of the amount required to pay the principal of and the interest on said bonds when due and that no ad valorem tare leery is accordingly required, SEC . 16 a The officers of the City and the County Auditor 'of Anoka County are hereby authorised and directad to prepare and furnish to the • purchaser of said bonds and to the attorneys approving the legality Of the issuance thereof, certified copies of all proceedings and records relating to said bonds and to the financial affairs of said City, and such other affidavits, certificates, and information as may be required, tza show the facts srelett tng to the and masckets'Mitr of s^td 1-4 nds as ttbe same appear fTox the books and irecords under theirs custody and control os as otherwise known to ahem, and such certificates, certified copies and affidavits, including my heretofore furnished, shall U deemed representations of the City as to the correctness of all statements contained therein. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY CONNCIL OF 20 CITY OF FRUXEY THIS ATTEST - • CITY CLERK • DAY OF . , 1 MAYOR CITY MANAGER RBSOLU ION NO, r� m6-- A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE SAW & P1MMSE W '1 OORARY IMPRMMENT BOND IN ACCORTWM WITH LAWS CP 1957, CiIAB'1TsR 385, • BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as followo: THAT WHHRSAS It has heretofore been determined by this council to issue temporary improvement bonds in order to provide the necessary `mss for the construction and payment of expenses relative to the following improvement projects: to-wit: street ut Project No. 2965.1 as ,per plans and spacif f cations approved by Vile_ Cit-r Counci is and WHEREAS It has been determined that there is at the present time an amount in 03=88 of $1504000.00 in the following fund to -wit: REGULAR I.P10AL A83S3SMMT FUND (SiStW ACCOwr! which sum will not be required for other purposes prior to November 15. 1967° • IT I3 TMS = determined to be in the interest of the City of Fridlay that the sum of $150A000900 of special Assessment Fund i3inkinS Account) BE INVESTED as authorized by law and in accordance therewith it is hereby determined to purchase the am of $150,000,00 of the aforementioned Stras Im rovement Project Noe 196Sr1 Bonds Series "A" ra issued under date of 122Mbar IS, 1965 OM their initial issuance in accordance with the provision of Minnesota Statutes Seca 629,091, and 471066 out of the funds in Sklar Spacial 148 Assessment Fund Sinkftg Accont) , and on behalf of said fund at par and accrued or��v,ar��arrn � o +.ris interest as of the date of delivery of said boards and completion of such sale; it being further determined to be reasonable and advantageous to 31 Acox =t of the Ragalar Special Assessment Fund to invest in said temp�ary improvement bands and to be reasonable and advantagsous to the City to sell 0 said temporary laprovemut bcnada Wet �3in as Account of the Se Ia: Sic al Asses poutFbadoin accordancs3 with the provisions of this rasolvtiaao • SEC 1a The City Manager and Treasurer are hereby authorised and directed to tales any and all steps necessary to effect the provisions of the afoeego£ng resolution and to main such transfer of funds as may be necessary from time to time to g£V+e offset to the provisions hareofo PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL CF FRIDIEY 1'1M8-.— DAY OF i CRY clock c: Mayor City Manager 14�� i November 15, 1965 'ISO: City Manager and City Council FROM: Marvin C. Brunsell Finance Director 150 Am SUBJECT: Temporary Bonds Storm Sewero Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvement f rojeet No. 73 Project No. 73 covers the installation CC the Stan. Sewer south of Highway # 100 and east of University Avenue, Bids a are let on August 16, 1965 'For this project. The estimated cost A ^roject No, 73 is $160,000.00 Final plans and specifications have been ordered fcr Project No., 73->B. Estimated cost of this improvement is$50,000v00 • This bond issue would provide $100,000.00 in temporary financing, The balance of the project will be financed at a later dat. i assn inON CIO, � :2 -C.4.... ) ci E SJ A RESOUMON I3Ui ZI wCTYFNG i ly 18 3TYJAI OF ?FqPCW"Y IMPROVEMNT BONDS IN ACCRODANCE WITH LAWS OF 1957, CHAPTER 385 BE IT RESOLVED By the Council of the CCi of Fridleyn Anoka County, Minnesota, as fol) *mt See, 1. The total estimated cast of Sewer and Water Imrpovement Project P 55 has been estimated inexcess at 12000000,00 See, 2. It in now estimated that the sum of $100,000,00 is currently necessary to provide financing of the projects above noted, and it is hereby determined to be necessary to borrow said amount for the payment of obligations now inourref and for expenses necessarily incurred in connection with the construction of s+ -d improvement projects, y , There is hereby created Sttorrm. Sewer, SanitarT Sewer raand Water IM MI ' P 73 Fund a *A41% shall conta a construction account as t Vraid MMMM*W-.M-A0MWAWM into which shall be paid all proceeds of temporary bonds issued pursuant to. this • resolution and similary subsequent resolution, and out of which shall be paid all amount due and payable as costs or expenses incident to or incurred in connection with the making of said improvement, So", 4, There is also hereby created in stosst Sewer, Sanitary 8stier, and WAL81 Ia roe- - S or- Sewe r ►+r�iirr•r�� went p 73 Fund ary) a Siaki Fund Account, whi h account in said F+msd any and shall be termed as tiny Sinking Fund, into which fund shall be paid the proceeds of all special assessments levied against benefited property by reason of the making of said improvements as wall as other monies therein to be paid as provided by the law and out of which shall be paid the principal and interest on all temporary impromnut bonds issued to finance said project, fie. 5, It is hereby determined that the sum of $100,000,00 shall be borrmed to f inane, said S Sewer, Smile .M Sever and Mater IggMMment Pro et p 73 • 15? vi.th respect to cost of cc ,struction and expenwe ne.wasaxily incurred relative Hereto to this date, by the issua=a of temporary impment beds of the City of Fridley, as authorised in Mjunsaota statues, See. 429,01, Subdivision 3, as aad by laws 1957, Chpater 385, S, ace 6: , Said ;vnda shall be payable from the Sinking Fund of the foltoviagt Store► Sever SanilM Sewer, and Water rMeLovement # 73 Fund but the City further reeognize its duty under the law, as provided by Scc, 429,0910 and convenants and agrees with the purchaser and all holders from tins tc time, of said temporary Improvement bonds, at or prior to the maturity thereof th-t it will pay and retire such bonds and the Interest thereon out of the proceeds of detinitive Improvement bonds which the council shall issue and sell at or prior to the mLmrity of the temporary Improvement bonds to the extent that the same cannot be paid. o:t of funds available in the Sinking Fund of Storm Sewer, Sanitary Sewer, and Pater 1xq;&wre- sent tl 3 Fund or out of other municipal funds which are properly availat le and are appropriated by the council for such purpose. Secs° 7°. it is hereby determined to levy special assessments against bencfitsd property by reason of the making of StA ,. Sanitary► Sever, and Water 19 rc"Unlat pro ct # 733 and to levy ad valorem taxes, if necessary, t;� produce stuns at least 5�6 in excess of the amounts sufficient to pay principal and interest when dve an said temporary improvement bonds and on any definitive bonds to be issued as lArain pr*vidsdt such special assessments to be placed on the tax rolls at such time when said improemsnt projects have been completed or the total cost thereof has been determiwA. Sec ._ 8, Said temporary improvement bonds in the amount of $1000000,00 of-tall be denominated Store Sewer. Sanity Sewer and Water I ut g;LqJsct As 73 Bond ser.1" "A" (TEMPORARY) shall be twenty (20) in number and numbered tf-om 1 to 20 Inclusive, each In the denomination of S 000a00 shall bear interest at ha rate of 414, 0 153 per, annum,, payable semi - annually of Play 15th and November 15th, of each year and shall specified for redemption of said bonds, the City Treasurer shall mail notice of the call thereof to the holder, if known, said Treasurer shall maintain a record of tbg names and addresses of the holders of said bonds insofar as such information is made available to him by the holders thereof, for the p %- ,, 3ose of mailing said notices, Tie principal and all interest on said bonds shall be payable at Fridley CitZ Aall�-6431 Vniv�eersi Z► Ave., NAB Mitm.aoolis 21 Minnesota* Sec* 9. temporary Improvement bonds shall be mimeo a hed and when s }'�mim!Map ww so. shall have attached thareto an interest coupon which Bond and Coupon shall be substantially in the following fora: 0 L1 mature on November 15, 1967 shall be subject to redemption and pre-payment on any interest date, at par and accrued interest, Not lase than 30 days before the date specified for redemption of said bonds, the City Treasurer shall mail notice of the call thereof to the holder, if known, said Treasurer shall maintain a record of tbg names and addresses of the holders of said bonds insofar as such information is made available to him by the holders thereof, for the p %- ,, 3ose of mailing said notices, Tie principal and all interest on said bonds shall be payable at Fridley CitZ Aall�-6431 Vniv�eersi Z► Ave., NAB Mitm.aoolis 21 Minnesota* Sec* 9. temporary Improvement bonds shall be mimeo a hed and when s }'�mim!Map ww so. shall have attached thareto an interest coupon which Bond and Coupon shall be substantially in the following fora: 0 L1 1�4 (Form of Coupon) No. $ • (Unless the bona described below is culled for earlier redemption on the day of Q , 19 �W ft the Of County, Minnesota, will pay to bearer at Minnesota, the sum of DOLLARS lawful money of the United States of America for interest than due on its Dated Manager mayor Sec...�:...10.. Said bonds and coupons attached shall be prepared under the direction of the Clay Tanager and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signature of the 10 Mayor -nd "anger, and the corporate seal of the City shall be affixed thereto, and_ the appurtenant interest coupon shall be mimeographed and authenticated, by the printed, engraved, lithographed, or' facsimile signatures of said Mayor and Managery When said bonds Have been executes and authenticated that' shall be .slivered by the 'treasurer to the purchaser thereof ,l upon payment of the purchase price heretofore agreed upon and accrued interest to date of de!tvery and said purchaser shall not be obliged to see te'the application thereof. SM 11 b The City Manager is hereby authorised and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with County Auditor of Anoka County, together with such other information as he shall require and to obtain frm said County Auditor a certificate that said bonds have been entered on this bond register. Sec. 12o The bonds issued hereander shall be payable from Storm Sewer D Sanita§02r. • and Water IewrgaMt # 73 Fund which► is hereby created. The Weasu_� er shall camie all monies received from the proceeds of said bonds, all monies appropriated and transferred from other +.�.-�- ntz prorvide 2 t.-hat is an -y k !ayt b I of principal car inte ast shnil be dj.� ;;hare is not ,sufficient c T,, in said fund to pay the crate, the Treasurer shall pay such principal or interest i't.•am • the general fund of the City and such fund shall be reimbursed for such advances out of monies to be credited to said fund when said monies are collected. All proceeds for said bonds except accrued interest shall be credited to the fund and used to pay the cost of said improvements. Sees 13 It is further provided that should it appear at any time that the monies credited to said fund and rovided for the p payment of principal or interest an the bonds when the sums become due are not sufficient to pay the same, that then the City shall issue further definitive improvement bonds as authorised and provided in accordance with Minnesota statutes, Saco 429.091, Chapter 4759 and that the + of said further definitive- bonds shall be first used to pay the principal and iatsrest as is then due and to redeem the temporary boards issued thersandero See" 14 The City OMMil has determined that not less than eighty per cent (90%) of the total cost of said its will be paid by special assessments to be levied agsiost every lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by the said improvemsats0 The City hereby convenants and agrees that it will do and perform, as soon as they can be done, all acts and things necessary for the final and NIM levy of such special assessments, and in the event that any such assessments be at any time held invalid with respect to MW lot, piece or parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity, or in any action or proceeding talosn or to be taken by the council or any of the City Officers or eoirleyeas, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any condition pot eedent -£hereto, the City and this Council will forthwith do all such further proceedings as may" be ikuquLred by law to make such assessments valid and binding liens against such propwtq, and also shall take such further proceedings as may be requited by law to provide nooses for the payment of principal and interest as the same fall due on the'bouds issued hereunder and to provide for the redemption of the same, • 1 7�6 will be in an awmnt of at teast five per mnt (5'%' in e=sss of the amount required to pay the principal of and the interest on said bonds when due and that no ad valorem tax . levy is accordingly required. Sec. 16. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Anoka Countyoare hereby authorised and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser of said bands and to the attorneys approving the legality of they issuance thereof. certified copies of all preosedint and records relating to said bonds and to the financial affairs of said City. and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required, to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of said bands as the sans appear from the booms and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and such certificates, certified c.+�,?ies and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the correctness of all statmsnts contained therein. PASSED BY THE CITY CMML THIS MY CIFr,,019, ATM=: 1157 i RESOLUT,WN NO.,, • A. RESOLUTION DIRECTING TAIL SALE AND PURCHN.SF. (Tr' Tl&mpoRARY IMPROVEMENT BOND iN ACCORDA NE WITH W%WS OF ;! 'r r „ Gi P IBR 385 BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the ctt;y of Fridley, Anoka County,, Minnesota, as f of lows g THAT WHEREAS it has heretofore been determined by this Council to issue temporary improvement bonds in order to provide the necessary futu s for tae construction and payment of expenses relative to the followinf improvement projects to -wit: Stogy,; sanitary sewer and. Water Improvement Pro_bet 112, 73; as tner plate and specifications approved by the City Council; and WHERM Lt has been determined that there is at the present time Ern amount in excess of $100.000,00 in the following fund, to-wits Legal Special Assessment Fund - - -- which am will not be requi =-ed • for other purposes prior to November 15, 1967, IT IS THRREFORE determined to be in the interest of the City of F--idley that the mum of $100,000,00 of �Reelar SMcia�lAAs, sessmsnt Fund CS Acs count ) BE INVESUD as authorized by law and in accordance therewith it i3 hereby determined to purchase the sum of $100,000,00 of the aforementioned Storm Sewer 8anit= Sewers and Water Improvement Wiest 173 Bosnds (Series "A ") temporary issued under date of November.15, 1965 UPON their initial issuance in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutess Seca 429,091, 471056 and 475066 s out of the funds in Regular Special Assessment Fund (Sinking Account) and on behalf of said fund at par and accrued interest as of the date of delivery of said bonds and completion of such sale; it being further deterell ed to • be reasonable and advantageous to 8iBNW AcqMt of 02 Raranlar 8220141 Asaessment Fund to invest in said temporary improvement bonds and t) be reasonable and .advantageous to the City to seal said temporary improve- ment bond to tha Si n Account of the Spacial Assessment Fund in accordas4&with the provisions of this resolution. SEC„ 1. The City Manager and Treasurer are hereby authorised and drected to take any and all steps necessary to offset the provisions of the aforegoing resolutions and to make such transfer of funds as may be necessary from time to time to give effect to the provisions hereof, PASSED MID ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF FRIDLBY TBIS DAY G' 0 City Clerk i Mayor City Manager 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ABATING THE BALANCE OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR SW -21 ON LOTS 10 AND 11, BLACK As RrVERVIEW HEIGHTS ADDITION WHOREAS, application has been made for the abatement of the lateral assessments on Lots 10 and 111, Block A, Riverview Heights Addition, and WHEREAS, it is the judgement of the Council that the lateral assessment on Lot 10 and Lot 11. Block A. Riverview Heights should be abated by reason of the property not being able to wake use of the lateral service. Wig THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley that the following assessments are hereby abated: Lot 10, Block A. Riverview Heights Addition - SW -21 - $256.68 and Lot 11, Block A, Riverview Heights Addition SW -21 - $256.68 • PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1965. ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell • MAYOR - William J. Nee 160 • RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVMWIT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND BS'1'IMATSS OF COSTS THEREOF: STRBBT UPROVEt = PROJSCT ST. 1966 -1 wuMMAS, Resolution No. 192 -1965 of the City Council adopted the lFt day of November, 1965, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as specifically noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A ", and wi —isms, all of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of these improvements (as noted in said notice) were given ten (10) days notice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) veekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property owners heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice. NOW, THBRSFORS, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That'the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution. No. 192 -1965 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible, to-wit: • a) The improvements as noted under the Construction Item A in the Notice of Hearing (in Exhibit "A") for the following streets: Kimball Street: Riverview Terrace to S. River Road Janesville Street: Riverview Terrace to E. River Road Ironton Street: Riverview Terrace to E. River Road Hugo Street: Riverview Terrace to 8. River Road Glencoe Street: Riverview Terrace to Z. River Road Riverview Terrace: Glencoe St. to Kimball St. Broad Avenue: Glencoe St. to Hugo St. Broad Avenue: Hugo Street to Kimball Street 75th Avenue: Old Central Ave. to Bacon Drive Service Drive along East of University: 73rd Ave. to 75th Ave. Proposed Street, Madison Street: Lyric. Lane to Osborne Road East -West Basemnt So. of Mississippi Place: Riverview Terrace to Z. River Road Pierce Street: Starting 700 feet So. of Mississippi Street to 63rd Avenue 63rd Avenue: Pierce Street to State Aid Street #302 in Shorewood Shopping Center Lucia Lane: 290 feet So. of 68th Place to 68th Place 68th Place: Lucia Lane West to Service Read Service Drive Bast of T.H. #65: 68th Place to 68th Avenue . Service Drive Best of T.A. #65: Shorewood Lounge to 63rd Ave. McKinley Street: 66th Ave. to 66kAvenue 66% Avenue: Alley between Fridley Street and McKinley Street to Stinson Blvd. Fridley Street: Mississippi Street to 67th Avenue Anoka Street: Mississippi Street to 67th'Avenua Resolution Vo. St. 1966 -1 66th Avenue: McKinley St. to Stinson Blvd. 66th Avenue: Arthur St. to McKinley St. Allay bet. 4th & 5th Streets: 53rd Ave. to 54th Ave. That the work above may be Consolidated with other areas as one improvement. Page 2 2. The work to be performed under this project may be performed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids. 3. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare final plans and specifi- cations for the making of such improvement. ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITr OF FRIDLEr THIS I* DAY OF , 1965 ATTEST: CITif CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell '0 MAYOR - William J. Nee 161 To The Honorable Mayor and Council of the City of Fridley. Gentlemen: Re: Project, St. 1966 -1. n I am the Owner of Record of Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, Section G,., River View 169 Heights situated in Anoka within the City of Fridley on the Corner of East River Boulevard and Hugb Street. Allow me to hereby voice my disapproval of the above entitled Project -St. 1966 -1 for Improvements on said Hugo St. I hereby Petition you and your Honorable body, that you discontinue all pending action therein, and that no further action therein be undertaken;. It is my opinion that the cost of the project will be far greater than any benefit that it may be to said lots and would work a severe hard- ship due to seemingly nonl- appreciative status of the land. November 23,1965, GeorgW C.Darveau, Owneb of Record. Jssociates _Ro,6tt Windew, _eq. engt. Um. 46 oqensen _eg. (5n9t. Suburban Engineering Inca -Byron IG Sneva �eg. Cngt. 4 % C. J ( _Bud) - R -Abun, �Reg. Sutveyot 6875 Mighway To. 65 `r% e Civil & %unicipal fi'ngineeting Winneapoks, .J%nnesota 55494 —rand Sutveyots 784 -6066 .Wand banning Soil Besting November 23, 1965 Honorable Mayor and City Council Earl Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Gentlemen: At the hearing on street improvements on November 15th, I was told that if Channel Road from Highway #65 to the east boundary of the property that Suburban Engineering, Inc. occupies were to be blacktopped that a new hearing would have to be held. As this is the end or side street of the property facing on the service road which is to be improved, I would like to know why this was not included in the pro - ject, and the costs pro rated over the whole project. On the south end of the project, you included 68th Place from the service road to Lucia Lane and used this on a third of said frontage for assessment purposes, so why wasn't the other end of the street put onto the project and assessed for a third of its frontage? I feel I am being assessed to pay for the side street at the south end of this project and later will have to pay for my own side street without help from anyone. I am asking that this street be put into the total project and if a petition is necessary, please let me know and I will submit a petition. Yours truly, R, P. Minder RPM:mlz • 163 164 M E M 0 November 30, 1965 TO: Earl P. Wagner, City Manager FROM: Marvin C. Brunsell, Finance Director SUBJECT: Letter from Robert Minder with reference to surfacing of Channel Road I have talked to Mr. Minder with reference to his letter of November 23, 1965. The consensus of this discussion was that he feels part of 68th Avenue should di be surfaced along with the service drive and the area to the south of 68th Avenue. This would seem reasonable inasmuch as we have held several hearings before on the surfacing of 68th Avenue and the project has never gone through as there has not been enough property to charge for the improvement. If this street were combined with the service road and Lucia Lane it would probably not affect the overall cost too much. This would probably require another hearing however, as there would be one additional property owner involved. That would be the owner of the Motel which is located on Lots 5, 6 and 7. Block 1, Valley View Manor Addition. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY &(M REPORT - MAP,CFi 1965 • STREET DEPARTMENT: I. Miscellaneous Street Work (160 hours). 2. Equipment Repairs - Street (112 hours). 3. Patching (1914 hours). 4. Shop Time - Streets (47 hours). S. gravel Hauling (23 hours). 6. Cleaning (36 hours). SWW AND ICE CONTROL: 1. Sanding - Ice Control (182 hours). 2. Snow Plowing (846% hours). 3. Miscellaneous Snow and Ice Work (251 3/4 hours). 4. Equipment Repairs d. Snow and Ice (67k hours). WATER DEPAR3M8N?: 1. Miscellaneous Water Work (9 hours). 2. Filtration Plant Operation (130 hours). 3. Hydrant Repairs (51% hours). . 4. Water Meter Inspections and Repairs (84 hours). S. Water and Sewer Inspections (Ilk hours). • 6. Pumphouse Work (47J hours). 7. Readings and Collections. (92 hours). 8. Water Turn Ons (51 hours). 9. Valve-Inspections and Repairs (10 hours). 10.. Equipment Repairs - Water (15 hours). SEWER DEPARa=• 1. M seellaneous Sanitary Sewer Work (127 hours). 2. Sanitary-Sever Inapections (12 hours). 3. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs (9411 hours). 4. Sanitary Sewer Cleaning (1394 hours). 5. Sanitary Sewer Break (10 hours). 6. Equipment Repairs - .Sewer (39 hours). STORK SEVER DSPAR�1l: 1. Catch Basin and Storm Sever Cleaning (413 hours). 2. Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work -(35 hours). MISCEIJ.ANEatiS: 1. Vacation (48 hours). 6. Park Department (29 hours). 2. Sick Leave (61 hours). 7. Police Department (13 hours). 3. Weekend Duty (23 hours). 8. Administration (2 hours). 4. Hurt on job (40 hours). 9. Painting Office (4 hours). . 5. Fire Department (20t hours). 10. Freezing Up Bob's Produce (2 hours) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY bF Fib= MONTHLY REPORT - APRIL 1965 STREET DEPARTM$NT• 1. Grading (151% hours). 2. Miscellaneous Street Work (213 hours). 3. Equipment Repairs - Streets (9P hours). 4. Gravel Sauling (153k hours). 5. Patching (534 3/4 hours). 6. Signs (43 hours). 7. Cleaning (85 hours). 8. Shop Time - Streets (98 hours). 9. Gravel Surfacing (13 hours). SNOW AND 102 0ONTROL: 1. Miecellaneous Snow and Ice Work (6A hours). WAUR DEPA : 1. $ydrant Repairs (82% hours). 2. Filtration Plant Operation (131% hours). 3. Pwsphouse Work (43% hours). 4. Valve Inspections and .Repairs (41% hours). 5: Water Meter Inspections and Repairs (33 hours). 6. Standpipe Repairs (10 hours). 7. Water and Sewer Inspections. (27 hours). S. Rpadings and Collections (61 hours). 9.. Water Tura Ono (23 hours). 10. Miscellaneous Water Work (15 hours). 11. Watermain Taps (12 hours). 12. Watermain Break (12% hours). 13: Equipment Repairs - Water (15 hours). SZnR DEPARMWT: 1*. Sanitary Sewer Cleaning (4884 hours). 2. Miscellaneous Sanitary Sewer Work (107 hours). 3. Sanitary Seger Inspections (21 hours). 4. Sanitary Sewer Break (52% hours). S Lift Station Inspections and Repairs (47 hours). b. Manhole Repairs (4 hours). Y. Equipment Repairs - Sewer '(41 hours). S. Serer Metering Station (1h hours). S_SSWSR ABl: 1: Catch Basin and Storm Sewer Cleaning (177% hours). 2. Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work (6018 hours). • Miggg .AM, 1. Hurt on Job (72 hours). 2. Flood Control (5224 hours). 3. Fire Department (45% hours). 4. Park Department (234 hours). S. Sick Leave (56 hours). 6. Holiday (80 hours). 7. Hauling for Sweeper (18 hours). 8. Weekend Duty (11 hours). 9. Engineering (34 hours). 10. Police Department (2 hours). • 0 11 PUBLIC WORMS DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1965 S„ TRREET DEPARDWT: 1. Grading (86 hours). 2. Cleaning (216 hours). 3. Patching (128 hours). 4. Equipment Repairs - Streets (70 hours). S. Miscellaneous Street Work (84 hours). 6.' Gravel Hauling (130' hours).. 7. Gravel Surfacing (18 hours). S. Signs and Barricades (3-% hours). 9: Shop Time - Streets (12 hours) . WATER DBPAR2K=: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8: 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Water Meter Inspections and Repairs (81% hours). Filtration Plant Operation (113 hours). Valve Inspections and Repairs (34k hours). Hydrant Repairs (67k hours). Watermain Break (26 hours). Miscellaneous Water Work (43 hours). Pumphouse Work (47 hours). Standpipe Repairs (18 hours). Water and Sever Inspections and Water Turn Watermain Taps (11 hours). Readings and Collections (57k hours). Metering Station (4 hours). Equipment Repairs - Water (37% Hours). SBWBR DEPAR'1M8141: Ons (414 hours). 1. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs (123 hours). 2. Manhole Repairs (11% hours). 3. Sanitary Sever Break (17 hours). 4. Sanitary Sever Cleaning (246 hours). 5. Miscellaneous Sanitary Sewer Work (674 hours). 6. Equipment Repairs - Sewer (23 hours). STO�EWER DBPAR�1'!: 1. Cateh Basin and Storm Sever Cleaning (29% hours). 2. Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work (48 hours). HISCELLAI MOOS: 1." Park Department (153% hours). 2. Vacation (68 hours). 3. Tornado (1144 hours). 4. Holiday (96 hours). 3. Weekend Duty (31 hours). 6. Police Department (16 hours). 7. Sick Leave (22 hours). 8. Flood Control (52 hours). 9. Fire Department (22h hours). 10. Funeral (12 hours). 11. Hurt On Job (96 hours). PUBLIC WORUS DEPART CITY OF FRIDLEY MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1965 STREET DEPARTH$NT: 1. Grading (169% hours). 2. Equipment Repairs - Streets (97% hours). 3. Stabilizing With Chloride (88 hours). 4. Miscellaneous Street Work (201% hours). 5. Gravel Hauling (287% hours). 6. Cleaning (147k hours). 7. Patching (533 hours). 8. Barricades (17 hours). 9. Gravel Surfacing (35 hours). 10. Shop Time - Streets (2 hours). WATER ABPART�t[T: 1. Watermain Break (524 hours). 2. Miscellaneous Water Work (17 hours). 3. Valve Inspections and Repairs (123 hours). 4. Readings and Collections (67k hours). S. Water Meter Inspections and Repairs (121 hours). 6. Water Turn One and Water and Sewer Inspections (61 hours). 7. Pumphouse Work (96 hours). 8. Filtration Plant Operdtion (160 hours). 9. Hydrant Repairs (97 hours). • 10. Standpipe Repairs (33 hours). 11. Watermain Tape (6 hours). 12. Equipment Repairs - Water (21 hours). SHUR 1. Sanitary Sever Break (198 hours). 2. Sanitary Sever Cleaning and Manhole Repairs (602 hours). 3. Equipment Repairs - Sever (16 hours). 4. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs (50 hours). 5. Sanitary Sewer Inspections (114 hours). 6. M scellaasous Sanitary Sewer Work (384 hours). STORM SAS DEPA,�„U T. 1. Miscellaneous Stara Sewer Work (148k hours). 2. Catch Basin and Stara Sever Cleaning (19 hours). 1. Park Department (2A hours). 6. Washouts and blood (3% hears). 2. Fire Department (22 hours). 7. Tornado (338 hours). 3. Engineering (46% hours). 8. Weekend Duty (24 hours). 4. Vacation (72 hours). 9. Police Department (18 hours). 5. Sick Leave (24 hours). 10. Basement Cleaning (10 hours). : 0 • 0 y Y b. �e�x.t. any ��E- `4: �F �::�x �... �...� � >� � g. . -. . , . . , .. .: r�::• ... : 0 • 0 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY MONTHLY REPORT - JULY 1965 STREET DEPA M NT: 1. Patching (440 hours). 2. Grading (82 hours). 3. Miscellaneous Street Work (260 hours). 4. Gravel Hauling (169 hours). 5. Shop Tim - Streets (31 hours). 6. Cleaning (128% hours). 7. Equipuent Repairs • Streets (129 hours). 8. Stabilizing With Chloride (55 hours). 9. Gravel Surfacing (60 hours). 10. Signs (58 hours). WATER DEPA82MBr1l: 1. Miscellaneous Water Work (23 hours). 2. Pwphouse Work (80k hours). 3. Filtration Plant Operation (171 hours). 4. Standpipe Repairs (35 hours). 5. Water Tura Ono and Water and Sewer Inspections (56% hours). 6. Watermain Break (60 hours). 7. Readings and Collections (83% hours). 8. Valve Inspections and Repairs (73 hours). • 9. Water Deter Inspections and Repairs (88J hours). 10. Hydrant Repairs (38 hours). 11. Waternsin Taps (3 hours). 12. Metering Station (9 hours). 13. Equipment Repairs - Water (15 hours). 1. Sanitary Sewer Break (120% hours). 2. Manhole Repairs and Sanitary Sewer Cleaning (195 hours). 3. Lift. Station Inspections and Repairs (60 hours). 4. Miscellaneous Sanitary Sewer Work 51% hours). 5. Sanitary Sever Inspections (17 hours). 6. Equipment Repairs - Sewer (18 hours). 51�0n ,M& DEPART: 1. Catch Basin and Storm Sewer Cleaning (764 hours). 2. Miscellaneous Storm Sever Work (316 hours). 1. Holiday (112 hours). 8. Survey (187 hours). 2. Vacation (413 hours). 9. Tornado (88 hours). 3. Park Department (88% hours). 10. Fire Department (14% hours). 4. Liquor (35 hours). 11. Sweeper (4 hours). • 5. Flood Control (4 hours). 12. Engineering (60 hours). 6. Sick Leave (52 hours). 13. Police Department (3 hours). 7. Weekend Duty (8 hour*).' 14. Beach House (86 hours). 0 Yr - ') A'ri E 11 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMT CITY OF FRIDLEY MONMY REPORT - AUGUST-1963 ST D AR'IIIT: 1. Patching (160 hours). 2. Grading (143 hours). 3. Miscellaneous Street Work (343 hours). 4. Gravel Hauling (122 hours). 3. Shop Time - Streets (26 hours). 6. Cleaning (132 hours). 7. Equipment Repairs - Streets (21A hours). S. Stabilixing With Chloride (21 hours). 9. Signs and Barricades (67 hours). 10. Gravel Surfacing (34 hours). SHOW AND ICS COlITROL: 1. Equipment Repairs - Snow and Ice (7 hours). WATER DEPARTHM: � r 1. Watermain Breaks (33 hours). 2. filtration Plant Operation (141% hours). 3. Miscellaneous Water Work (74% hours). 4. Pumphouse Work (464 hours). 5. Water and Sever Inspections and Water Turn 6. Readings and Collections (77 hours). 7. Valve Inspections and Repairs (37 hours). S. Hydrant Repairs (172% hours). 9. Watersain Taps (23 hours). 10. Water lister Inspections and Repairs (101 11. Standpipe Repairs (21% hours). 12. Equipment Repairs - Water (31 hours). 13. Water Shut offs (16 hours). 14. Metering Station (2 hours). SEWER DEPARDOW: Ono (60k hours). hours). 1. Miscellaneous Sanitary Sewer Work (54k hours). 2. Manhole Repairs and Sanitary Sewer Cleaning (251 hours). 3. Sanitary Sewer Inspections (21 hours). 4. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs (56 hours). 5. Equipment Repairs - Sewer (414 hours). F�i��;�:IF�- „EST ►i:� �r'� � Y i:�; M �F 1. Catch Basin and Storm Sewer Cleaning (60 hours). 2. Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work (509h hours). IiIS .. iE0U3. 1. Vacation (360 hours). 2. -Park Department 05 hours). 3. Sick Leave (54 hours). 4. Weekend Duty (12 hours). 5. Painting, Street Striping (1194 6. Fire Department (26 hours). 7. Engineering (35 hours). S. Sweeper (14 hours). 9. Hurt on Job (12 hours). 10. Survey (36 hours). hours)ll. Police Department (16 hours). 0 i. fly it r aw I SAW sit 107 4 �A.� r: 0 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR�ii ENT CITY OF FRIDLEY MONTHLY REPORT - SBPTMORR 1965 STREET DEFAR91M: 1. Grading (83 hours). 2. Equipment Repairs - Streets (201 hours). 3. Miscellaneous Street Work (183 hours). 4. Patching (307 hours). 5. Gravel Hauling (97h hours). 6. Shop Time - Streets (110 hours). 7. Curb Work (121 hours). 8. Signs and Barricades (53 hours). 9. Cleaning (142 hours). 10. Gravel Surfacing (40 hours). 11. Snow pence (2 hours). SNOW AND ICE CONTROL: 1. Equipment Repairs - Snow and Ice (45 hours). WATER -D 1. Readings and Collections (74h hours). 2. Water Meter Inspections and Repairs (95 hours). 3. Valve Inspections and Repairs (624 hours). 4. Water Turn One (28 hours). S. Standpipe Repairs (14 hours). 6. Filtration Plant Operation (122 hours). 7. Pumphouse Work (47k hours). 8. Watarnain Breaks (162 hours). 9. Hydrant Repairs (42� hours). 10. Miscellaneous Water Work (31 hours). 11. Water and Sewer Inspections (21h hours). 12. Watermain Taps (11 hours). 13. Equipment Repairs - Water (28k hours). SEWER DEPART=: 1. Sanitary Sewer Cleaning and Ma,ahole Repairs (235 hours). 2. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs (135 hours). 3. Equipment Repairs - Sever (884 hours). 4. Sanitary Serer Inspections (50 hours). 5.. Sanitary Sever Breaks (30 hours). STORM SBWSR DEPAR�l1T: 1. Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work (241 hours). 2. Catch Basin and Storm Sewer Cleaning (66 hours). MISCELLANSOOS: 1. Holiday (128 hours). 2. Park Department (55� hours). 3. Voting Booths (44 hours). 4. Vacation (52 hours). 5. Funeral (24 hours). 6. Tornado (79 hours).. 7. Fire Department (4 hours). S. Hurt on Job (32 hours). 9. Weekend Duty (8h hours). 10. Engineering (17 hours). 11. Sick Leave (16 hours). 12. Police Department (1 hour). 0 0 LJ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY MONTHLY REPORT - OCTOBER 1965 SEW DBPAR'IM�TY: 1. Grading (118 hours). 2. Equipment Repairs - Streets (104% hours). 3. Shop Time - Streets (10 hours). 4. Miscellaneous Street Work (139 hours). S. Curb Work (46 hours). 6. Patching (563% hours). 7. Gravel Hauling (71 hours). 8. Cleaning (26 hours). 9. Gravel Surfacing (18 hours). 10. Signs (14 hours). 1. Equipment Repairs - Sam and Ice (24 hours). 2. Miscellaneous Snow and Ice Work (3 hours). WATER VOW DEPA1tTM81tT: 1. Miscellaneous Water Work (3 hours). 2. Watermain Taps *(3% hours). 3. Water and Sewer Inspections and Water Turn Ono (55k hours). 44 Standpipe Repairs (2911 hours). 5. Puvvhouss Work (46 hours) . 6. Filtration Plant Operation (88% hours). 7. Water Meter Inspections and Repairs (6A hours). S. Valve Inspections and Repairs (61% hours). 9. Readings and Collections (404 hours). 10. Hydrant Repairs (96 hours). 11. Watermain Breaks (3k hours). 12. Equipment Repairs - Water (19k hours). :� . ;•'! k 1. Miscellaneous Sanitary Sewer Work (115 hours). 2. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs (93 hours). 3. Sanitary Sewer Cleaning (251% hours). 4. Equipment Repairs - Sewer (41% hours). 5. Manhole Repairs - (59 hours). 6. Sanitary Sewer Inspections (43 hours). S70EN S, 1MR, HBP : 1. Catch Basin and Storm Sewer Cleaning (154 hours). 2. Miscellaneous Storm tower Work (33 hours). MCEL�i, AZt.,iBCUS : 1. Sick Leave (47 hours). 2. Park Department (131% hours). 3. Vacation (56 hours). 4. Holiday (120 hours). 5. Cleaning Tin Shed (24 hours). 6. Weekend Duty (2 hours). 7. Dire Department (48 hours)., S. Survey (24 Fours). 9. Engineering (14 hours). 10. Police Department (7 hours). 11. Sodding for Sewer (8 hours). 0 0 0 4 j.r a YXA ' 0 0 0 I CITY OF F RIDLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT Monthly Report • October, 1965 Cleared or This Mo. To Date This Mo. This Yr. Unfounded PendiR& Last Yr, Last Yr, COMPLAINTS ADULT Domestic 6 78 78 14 100 Assault 1 11 9 2 11 Drunk 2 7 7 1 5 Diso, Conduct 5 34 31 3 26 Liquor Laws 6 6 9 Firearms 5 4 1 1 Resist Arr. Other 7 134 122 12 29 289 JUm nz Assault 4 14 10 4 4 Diso, Conduct 7 50 45 5 Liquor Laws 3 24 24 4 20 Firearms 2 7 4 3 1 3 Runaway 5 45 45 8 26 Vandalism 43 156 62 94 25 190 Other 15 115 109 6 11 140 Robbery 2 1 1 2 Burglary 7 67 18 49 4 71 Theft Over $50 28 176 44 132 17 121 Under 50 36 251 105' 146 42 233 Other 34 335 276 59 32 510 ii MOTOR VEIIIME Mileage Gas X Ex ense C� P *M* $ Unit #24 '22256 246.8 9.1 91.97 .040 Unit #25 4,766 605. 7.8 Unit #26 4,558. 531.4 .6 222.68 .046 Unit #28 591- 47.6 12.4 15.18 0025 Unit 029 4,617 551.2 8T.4 194.03T ACCIDENTS This Mo.. This Year Las �earh d 1.042 LastgYear Personal Inj 13 141 15 147 Property Damage 22 232 22 183 Fatal 2 1 RADIo CALLS 400 39057 246 20912 ASSISTANCE TO p o oodles 36 430 34 306 Other P.D. 3 79 10 108 Fire Dept. 4 17 3 38 Medical 13 113 15 176 TRAFFIC ARRESTS S;eod 40, 299 57 436 D.U.I. 4 24 8 56 Open Bottle 7 4 26 Careless Driving 12 54 9 93 Reckless Driving 1 D/L cusp or, Rev 3 23 1 39 D/L other 5 40 10 86 Signs & Signals 12 87 10 46 Parking 13 122 11 121 Other 4 163 7 153 D. 0. II. TESTS bur`s ......._ 2 5 28 Others 2 3 27 JA IL • `-Our Prisoners 16 215 22 249 Other Prisoners 7 103 9 177 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 66401 November 10, 1,965 Mr. Earl P. Wagner, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Minneapolis 21, Minnesota Dear Sir: 4 -175 Watt Overhead Lamp Installed 10/20/65 Brookview Cul de Sac bet. 68th Ave. N.E. & Mississippi St. N.E. Mercury Vapor Tempo Terrace & Jackson St. N.E. Mercury Vapor Ely St. N.E. at dead end, East of R Verview Terrace I Mercury Vapor Ely St. N.E. at dead end, West of E. River Rd. Mercury Vapor. Fire Phone 560 -1110 Bus. Phone 560 -3450 Fridley Fire Department " Yomz of �nEetnaElona�' 2lnifovn Matkincg of .ffn,7 "s =Yonua" 6431 University Avenue N. E., Fridley MINNEAPOLIS 21, MINN. December 60 1965 The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley, Minnesota Gentlemen; The Fire Department at its regular meeting on December 2, 1965 directed me, by a unanimous motion to advise the Council of the departments' objection to the waiver of certain building code requirements that deal with matters of fire safety and life hazards, without consulting with the Chief of the Department or the Chief of the Fire Prevention Bureau. The department is aware that action\of this nature is entirely within the 6 jurisdiction of the City Council, but it would like to point out that by making concessions of this nature, it sets a very dangerous precedent and thereby weakens the effect and intent of the whole process of pro - tective codes. It "further reduces the effectiveness of the departments' effort-a in the crucial areas of fire prevention and life safety. We would also like to point out that codes such as this serve a very definite purpose. They set a minimum standard to assure that a reasonable degree of safety is provided. The Building code of the City of Fridley is felt to be a sufficient code but it is not considered to be unduly restrictive. The Minneapolis code, for example, is much stricter in the areas in question. This is particularly in the matter of sprinkler requirements. Our code requires sprinklers only in the areas designated as storage and work areas. The Minneapolis lode would require that the complete basement area be sprinklered, because of the storage of more than three automobiles in the basement. N respectfully request that, in situations of this type, where one side is able to present their story, the Fire department be consulted to pre - sent their side. Having heard both sides of the issue we feel the Council will be better able to make a just decision* Respectfully yours., • ,Z Robert S. Hughes, Chief Fridley Fire Department