Loading...
12/20/1965 - 5945a REGULAR cot=CIL MATING Ammer - Dd- 20, 1965 Regular NNetiug4 6e 1965, 1 • OR Final. Plat - Commerce Park, 20 On- A*XQDW frm A -2. R -3 & M-i to 0�2 & 16.2 to M -1 - (.park), 3jD on spacial use Permit - Nursing no" - portion of Outiot is Melody manor, 4. on Roa=WV from R-1 to R -3A • portion of Outlet is lMlody .Manor, 5. On Rezoning from R -1 to C-1 - Portion of Outlet is Melody Manor, 6- Lot split - L"65 -10 - vesnoa Larson (tobied 12/6/65). 7, S6C0nd Reading Of Ordinance - Sign Regulations 80 Consideration of Ordinance - Housing Code (tabled 12/13/65 ) , Pages 1 - 20. Pigrs 21 & 22• Page 230 Pages 24 & 25. Page 26. Page 27. Page 280 Pages 29 - 38* Pages 39 & 400 9. SOCOW Reading of Ordinance - Amaaditg B�rCtiva� ,� 46.01, Page 410 10. Bids - Ice MaChine (Opened Rona, 12/20/65)o Page 420 11. Police Ccmaaission, 12o Fridley Sousing and Redevelopment Authority Ard�►itecttttral, Zngineering, and tnspectian Repart" an City Center Area, 130 Planning Cometesion m"ting Minutes, Deceaher 16, 1965,a 81 - 930 9 JOGULRR COURM OWING AAA - 20, 1965 (CoutImsed) 140 Board of Appeair aMe,tIng Hinutes, Dammbw 8, 1965, Page 43. 66 - 15o BUMAI g Board iMdtiag Miaette,a, DOOMb c 8, 1965, Page 440 Pages 16 o Building Board MMtiag Klaftes, 15, 1965, Page, 45. 17. Safety -looting M =tea, Dooudmr 15, 1965, Page, 460 18o Fridley Rot IM and Redewlopmn et Authocity Meeting Minutes, Dea:esobeor 10 19650 Pages 47 • 50. 19e CMM3njAmtlous# Pages 51 - 55. (a) Water Pollutions Coy uel Com"unums Hearing an Much Z, 1966, (b) Ministerial Associations Slectioas (c) Walla fts Resigmtioni - Building Bowrd j (d) Month Sd=b= Hospital Dlstriat: Reg"Utioas 381 j 20. ClaIM, Page 560 21, Ratiantea, Pages 57 - 610 22o LIcauses, Pages 62 & 63. 23. Coaaidwatia u of ordina=m Au=ding c baptrr 88 - WJj*m VdLWlea, Page 64o 24o Applicstioa for Sign Peac»it .. 5650 Polk Street Hoacthaast - �pastnwats, Page 65 0 25o Possible, Losso of Space, 26o Aathcocise Advertiseosnt far aids - TCWUV, Pages 66 - 690 279 mange 0&94W 03 - W -75-►, Pages 70 - 720 28o CCOSIOCtUG to R.S *SoS.Do, 29, xosoluticas Authevising Bids far PUNIPS & Filters - W- 75 -O»2, ;L /�, Page 73. itZGULAR vow, tZr=Q AaRMA MCMen 20, 1965 (Coutinwd) 0 30. Two Rssolutims SPlittiug SPsaial Asses s - Lots 26 and 278 Block 4, Hamiltau's Addition to lMmsanLasvilia, and Part of Lot 20, Auditor's 3v2diviai= NO, 920 aigss 74 & 750 13 310 Rmsolutian Authmizing Adv=tisoMUnt 9M Bills - Tiras and Chsi=e ZIP Pages 76 & 770 32o Tr&=fWt1b g F�ii1dB - ,965 BU690t, Pq* 780 J 330 RasolutUm BBtablisb�ing Wages - Oit -3Bla Clrtks, Page 790 R�saitatiaa asta�llishing Wags - Oassa].a Stoaeas, page 800 340 r- -I L ' 1#.I; • i • <' �.• Ii•. � :1: ��. .. �, :. ..It �• a; �_ �. : is �:1' �/ 1. OR FINAL PLAT - CO1WMCB PARRs 2he Notice of Hearing is as page 21. A letter fran Joseph Wargo relative to the aosessM1, --t, i on this plat is self- planatoary, and is on Page 220 2 o ON FMIONM PROK R -2, R -3 & W1 TO N2, & *-2 TO X-1 (CONS PAW) t The Notice of Hearing is an Page 23. 3o ON SPACIAL USE PERMIT - NURSXUG HOME - PORTION OF OVPLOT 1, MELODY MANORS The Notice of Hearing is an Page 240 The amata of Appeals has this and the Planning CowAssicn is aansiderIng it tanight. I understand, hoWever, that the patty w1ehing to build the Nursing Home has decided to wait in this matter. on Page 25 is a drawing of the zoning requests and the nursing hone speaiai use permit fair heads• #3, #4, and #5. 4. ON RBZOCI a FRoi[ R -1 TO R-3A - PORTZ= OF OUTLOT 1s ia7AW MA MS The Notice of Hearing is an Page 260 So ON RSZOWMIG FROM A -1 TO C -1 - PORTZ= of OVPLOT 10 MELODY Mi gMil The Notice of Hearing is an Page 270 6a LOT SPLIT - LS#65 -10 - VS2N t LARSM (TAM= 12/6/65)g on Page 28 Is the Planning Coaonissioaa • s reca�scsasdatIon. and a drawing of the lot split as reaomnrendeal by the Co=4 usion. This teas tabled at the request of Mr. LOCSOn, and I do not know whethW oar not he will be at this meeting to discuss this with you* 70 SaCMW READING ©F CRD $ - SIGN FX4ULATIONs The ovdina=.3e is an Pages 29 through 38. Oranges made since the first re alM on Dec. sober 6th are usx�eaCI la" an the pages there the Changes are no". 8. Cpii81UN ATICN OF can - HOUSING COfi (TABLUD 12- 13-65) s The ordinance is an Pages 39 and 40. 90 SBCObTD RWW=G OE ORDIaTMM ANWW=G SCMICK 46.01: The a rdinance is on Page 41. 10 . SIDS - XCZ M MME (OPMD NOCC, 12/20/65) 1 The bid speaifieettirons �J REGULAR c;OMIL MtS n1G AGE=& COMMMS - DHC SNM 20, 1965 (Conti mad) are on Page 42. I will have a tabulation and a revs dMUM an the bids at the meeting o llo POLICE C OM SSIONs Mrs. BVMWt the semcetary of the POliae Commis - siaon, asked that time be given to the Police Cossaissiodn . at this mestipg o I do not know what the Commission my wish to discuss. 12. FRZDLBY H W=G An ABDHVE?APi M AUTHGRITY , 10- MOU310, AND IQSP'iC'TICB1 REPW - C 2W CRNTBR ARMAt I do not have the report to give You with this agenda. The Come" has discussed this with We Mayera of the Housiaq AuthWity, and I assmem they will have the report to hand to you at the mmetiWo 13,- PtAmTm coHmsion MB ino mss, rmczmR 16, 1965: I will not have these minutes in tiers to make comrpants can these. They will be at the back of this agenda as numbered an the rodeo and a report fram Hodno Associates is JmIudeda This report comescBs itself with the hearings in Items #4 and #5, above, on Pages 26 md•27, with the hearing In Item #24, above, an Page 230 and with the crossover of 61St at T.H. #65. 14e BOARD OF APPEALS NESTING MnUMS, EzcZmZR 8, 1965* The action by the Board of Appeals was coascerned only with vari new in this =attere and they did reccm Und the variance. The minutes are an Page 43 and this action relates to - ,Building Dowd action. in Item #16, below, on Page 45. 15. BUILDIBG BOARD DIBmm xximms, iscu 8R as 1965: The mim tes are an Page 44o' sime there was no quarms there is no action t'he Council can take, 16o BUILDING BOARD MBSTIM MTXOTEB, MCBMER 15, 1965l Both Ltd= In the minutes an Page 45 were tabled, cc aoatJ=md. 17. SAFETY COW mfr rr ild; jowl= ASS. ERC UMM 15, 1965: These Minutes are an Page 46. The recolation in Item #2 relates back to the pl&4 considered by the co mil in Item #1, above. The committee tabled active in Iteaa #3, so there is no action an heat required by the couneil 18o FRIDLEY EMSING Ate RSDBVELOPM NT AvTHORIT'Y MMM MUNUMS JZC- R 1, 1965: These minutes are an Pages 47 throo& 50. Any items that the Council wishes to discuss may be discussed at this time 190 C01 -- XCATZMM# (a) water Pollution Control .Cawissions Remim* on Nits M 20 19661 The Notice. of Heating is as Page 51. The City of Pridley should be W at this how1w, although I assume that the N rth Suburban sanitary Baum Disttiat e�actaiuly will be o (b) Miniat CUl AssoaiatiOUS 2lectiW8j The letbar on Page 52 is self eaWlanatcwye (a:) Walla Ms Resignation £rata Building Boardit "m letter on Page 53 is self- 0 The Council can accept this resignation, and I will see that Mr. Wallace getmthe usual thank you letter. This will then be placed as a vacancy on the list of comittee positions to be filled at the January 4th meeting. (d) North su7oud3an Haaapital DistriCt: Regulatiaotr: the lettAWS an Pages 54 and 55 ate self- aq?lanatacye I assures that there • will be saoone praasmt from the Hospital nossdo I have given Copiaa of these lett erS to the Piss a b l md; o 209 CUM & The claim nudmirs ate an Page 56. Detail of the claims is ina:luded in the envelope with the &90%"* 210 8sTMWW8S: A list of the'estimates is on Pages 57 and 58e Detail of the final estimates is an Pages 59 tbromo 61e 12o Lids, The l icenses for your amolderation we as Pages 62 and 63. 23e t70diSIDBRMI(m 08 0[iDINA -1 1 A- RDiDIN3 Q3APM 88 • VERMLaB: The ordiname, an Page 64 is self- mviamtocy, and z had the City Attoraw draw this ardInance based on some eoaplaints received from the LOeke Park Association. 24. APP3'.ICATtObt FOIL SZGH PERM - 5650 POM 82am T'he applir out 4an blank is an Page 650 • AP11R'�Rl'B s 25 o POSSUM LEASH OF SPACE t It appears that the City could crib-lesse 406 mMarr feet of space £ram the Fridley Housing and Redweloparnt • Authority in the Madsen BuiidlW for $135.40 per menthe It would appear that the best mows if the Council than ld c avant, would be to move the Sngi :fearing Dryarttrnt Office. and she PWbUa hafts Offive from the City Hall to that q?ace. This would then allow the Finance Department to use the 360 square fast of space vacated by ldtese two depattmants, it will be more difficult, for addizistmitve purposes, • RZOULAR COMM AMTIM AG== CONUMS - DAR 20, 1965 (Contlm d) to have the engineering and public works offices in the building next door* but the boo3dweping office and the main cc= of the City Hall are becoming so crowded that samebhiteg must be dose to provide more space. 26. AU1'Ii0RIZ3 AVJZRTISZJWMT FOR BIDS - TOMMs I had the Chef of Police check with Dtinneapolis and Columbia Se Lghts relative to their method of calling fcc bids far towing and umdAng automobiles, since I feel that this is this most equitable and seasible way to handle this matter. Thevefo re, I have placed a notice far bids an Page 66, the proposal form an Page 67, and the proposed m ontract on Pages 68 and 69 for your consideration. If you canow in ay re , —IMendation that this be done, a motion authaeriaimg the cash for bids would be in order. 27, CIMM ORDBR #3 -• W -75-As This change order is an Pages 70 throes 72. Der. Comstock or the City 8ng4 neeear CM explain this fvrtbear to • you at the meeting. 28. COMCTIOM TO Ve S.8. S. D.: I will be attending a meeting this after - noon at 3 :00 P.H, at which I may get some mature iafacm Um about the connection chargeso but I feel that this matter should be placed an the agenda, as does Mayor Nee, for discussion by the Counc=il, Out estimate of the :umber of REC ° s in Area #3,p which is to be a =opted to the N.S.s.S.D, trunk lime before January, is 1#026. At $100.00 per connection, this is $102,600.00. Mayor Nee having been on the Board for three years is much more aoaversant with the parobleme that might confront the City in this hookup# so that I will rely upon him to carry the ball if therea in a discussion at this time. I will, however, have the contract between Fridley and N. • . s . S o D. , the City ° s figures on RLC °s and any other information relating to this situation that I can ca Vi le by MwWay night, 29. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BIDS FOR PDVS AND FILTZRS - W--7S-L%-2s This resolution would further the program discussed by the Council in December of last year. The resolution is on Page 73. MW additional questions you may have can be directed to the Consulting Engineer or to the City Engineer. 30. TWO RSSOLUTicas SPLITTI1tiG SFSCiAL ASSESSHTS - LOTS 26 AND 270 • BLOCK 4, NADULTON°S ADDITgoN To McHANICSVILLE AND PART OF LOT 20, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISICIM No. 92% These two resolutions cc Pages 74 and 75 are routine resolutions and can be approved by the same motion, and we will split theaaaa in the minutes. R' OULAR COUNCIL MRT=G AM= C0! IMTS - nKXNBR 20, 1965 (Comtlaned) 31. RE8OLUTZMT AVM MIaIDKh ADVRRTISXNBMT FOR SIDS - TIOX AM CHUM8s 2b• tcaolution an Page 76 is esaf-ONVlanatorY, and the bid =*A* * if the Cavil appor'oves the resolution, is an Page 77• Althaudble we have bMn able to obtain excellent prices in buying tires by dePalCtmsAt, 1 fait that this might even give no betteo: porioes o At least an attempt should be made to tied out if it would result In loweor prices. 32* RSSOLO ZM TRAAdSFSR an Fri M - 1965 BWCUT: The common passes at least vne resoiutiaaa of the kind on Pago 78 SOC& yaWe and in scores yeas have passed two cer fibres. These trawfears are =We ascessary beawzw of M*Ions by the Council durIM tk*. yew far OVenditures that were not ©r were not bodgeted fcw the depart sent that eventually made the purchase a 33a RasOLUTXou HsTABLY:# me WAans - oFF -SALV CIXMj 'te a aolution on Page 79 is self- explanataocy. The Previous wags for the Clerk, and clerk and stoekmns Was $2.15 an hour, Thi a reQreaeieta a 70 ar • an ho inersase. Stockman °s previous wage was $2.01 an boar. Ate additional cwAesgian was maw by the MU= in that new clearks will Start lower than the going rate fm the first six =Mtbs as noted In Art icle #12* of you concur in the" wages and this wage iacroa". you would pass the rosolutai.an. Both her. M mire and I haw not with the UrAca and we feeh, that this is a reasonable settlem�I, b,, and much better than we anticipated, 34, RRSOLUTIM SSTABLISHMM WAM - Og-SMA STOMS s Tie resolution co Page 80 sets wages for the bartenders and the waitresses. Previous wage for the fazV - sight hover baartenciera were $2.60 an boot and this would Increase their gages to $2 4 70 per hour Q Previous wages foot the fozy-�hour week waitresses jigra $1,55 an hour and this would inetease their wages to $1.65, Previous wages for the short hover waitresses were $1.75 and this would increase the wages to $1.90. ThO t8>: UM also pasrnaitted the hiring of waitresses for six months at $1 ®50 per hour with the auto %ti+e inasease, if they were satisfactory, to $1.65 at the and of that ails mss. For choart hoar waitresses, the waitress would start at $1.65 per hour for six nwaaths with an automatic in=ease to $1.90 pear hour at the end of that 8V =Mthe. All City WWIQY Pt thle Limnos Store MV1 yeas get veterans Day Off- The Union askOd for both 'Veterans Da<y and a day off on the eMVlVYee "s birthday. They were willing to settle foot the employee being off ore his birthday,, Which of caur" is =xM better than having everybody due to be off an veterans Day. rr%io way, normally Dons person sot 4 time is off on that particular vacation day. severance cvLAR COUNCIL WTTrAG AM= COb WTS - DEMMER 20a 1966 tcantiUUed) • 0 • pay mentioned at the bottm or the C08011"Ition Cu pw* 80 is already in the pwsommrl tirdinome and actually gM11oeble to the full -tim ba a and waitresses® but I placed it is the resolution indicatlag it was a coDeession to thou • Tim MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL =TING OF DECEMBER 6, 1965 The Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Fridley was called to order by Mayor Nee at 8:35 P.M. ROIL CALL Members Present: Nee, Kirkham, Wright, Thompson, Sheridan Members Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEHM 8. 1965 Motion by Wright to adopt the minutes of the Special Council Meeting of November 8, 1965 as submitted. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. AMMAL OF _MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL BEETING - NOVEMER 15, 1965: Motion by Sheridan to adopt the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of November 15, 1965 as submitted. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays,.the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MUM - SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 17, 1965: Notion by Kirkham to adopt the minutes of the Special Council Meeting • of November 17, 1965 as submitted. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MUTES - SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 22. 1965: Motion by-Thompson to adopt the minutes of the Special Council Meeting of tovember 22, 1965 as submitted. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, tho motion carried unanimously. Pt1= t�ARING mss - A* CAN OIL MANY LCOn M n(24 11/l/ 6n-: Mr, Peter Coggeshall and Senator Donald Wright were present representing the American Oil Company, and Senator Root was present representing the interests of Arvid Carlson & Sons. Senator Wright stated that he examined the question mLether the City of Fridley is authorized, and has the power, to enable the Amrican Oil Company to transport its products in the public right -of -way in the City of Fridley. He stated that the easement 'Where the American Oil Company transports its products is privately owned, that the State bought this privately owned property and ordered the American Oil Company to mo,.e its pipeline. He stated that the American Oil Company wants to dove its pipeline into the public right -of -way on 3rd Street between 49th Avenue and 53rd Avenue Northeast. Senator Wright stated that he researched the law and found several court cases • which support his conclusion that the City of Fridley is authorized to grant a permit or franchise to the American Oil Company to transport its products in the public right -of -way. He stated that one of these cases came before the COUNCIL MEETING$ DECEMBER 6, 1965 pg(Z 2 Supreema Court of the State of Minnesota in 1895 and arose between the telephone. cry and a municipality where the telephone company wished to use the-streets • for laying auderground cable. He stated that this is one of the earlier cases concerning the transportation of private goo=fs that crows public property. He stated that the Supreme .Court decided that the concept of transportation vas, too uarcow,.that as Civilization advanced and weeds increased, all methods, iaoludiaag pipelines, were possible uses for the transport of goods in the public right -of -vay. Senator Wright.staeted that awther case concerned the Minneapolis Brewing Company ®s two of a public alley where a tunnel eras built for the transport of bottles from one plant of the Minneapolis Brewing Company to another. He stated that in this case, the court decided that the use of a tunnel below a public street was merely another means of transporting private property across the public right -of -way., A third case litigated its the State of Pennsylvania permitted a private property otimer to run a private drain in the public right - of -gray in spite of the opposition of abutting property owners. The Court also granted the private property owner the right to prevent other property owners from making connection to his drain, since the capacity of the drain was insuffi- cient. Senator Wright stated that he believes municipalities have all power over the streets that can exist. He stated that he does not believe a private property otmer can deny permission to another party to the public.right -of -way since private persons have a right to transport property on the surface, and the eaunicipality has a right to permit transfer of private property below the surface of the ground. Senator Wright stated that the City of Minneapolis has granted private parties the right to transport steam in lines.underground. He said that when a street is dedicated it becomes the property of the public, is under the control of the public, and the only thing a private party needs to make use of the street is s permit from the municipality to do so. Senator • Wright stated that the Americaan Oil Company is D esently using other public right -of -way in the City of Fridley and has paid $2200 personal property taxes upon the pipelines located in the City of Fridley. Couaeilmaa Wright asked Senator Wright whether there is a difference in law between the rights a private carrier has in the public right -of -way and a common carrier on the public right -of -way. He stated that a private carrier asking for a permit to run a pipeline is asking for an exclusive use in part of the public right - of -vay, whereas, a surface carrier does not ask exclusive use. Senator Wright stated that he does not believe there is any distinction between a privately owned utility and a private carrier. He stated that in the Minneapolis Brewing Company case, tae tunnel was strictly for use by the private party who was not a common carrier. Senator Uright stated that many cases in other states have been upheld where a private carrier has been allowed to use the public right -of- way, and that at the present time, the American Oil Company is using a portion of 49th Avenue. Senator Donald Wright stated that where the private carrier user an exclusive portion of one street, there are otlicr portions of the street and other streets available to other private carriers if they wish to do likewise. Mr. Pater Coggesh all stated that of the total voltcme of patroleun carried by American Oil Company 17% of the product is transported over private property, 14% over county and municipal streets, 24% over public h; gn:: ?ay right -of -ways, and 43% over railrc•gd right -of -ways. ?rir. Coggeshasl stated that if the product trawported by pipelines were transported on the surgece of public roads, it would increase the burden upon the public roads. lily. Coggeshall stated that • :here are presently in the City of PFia!nespolis 10 blocks of pipeline in public atrceta aoned and used by American Oil CoVany, and Mere have been no complaints cone¢ -ninlr the use of the public right-of­ way. COUNCIL FETING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 3 • Senator Root stated that nothing has been said by Senator Wright to change his position. He stated that the first case mentioned by Senator Wright was the Oberg case, which was researched by his own office before he decided to challenge the use of the public right -of;way by American Oil Company. He said that the judge's statements in the Telephone Company case are given on page 542 of Volume 60. He stated that the judge ruled in this case that the assumption is made that the use of the telephone line will be open to the public. Senator Root said that the Pennsylvania case was the Wood case, which has been used as a precedent many times in law, and at the time the Wood case came before the courts, the law had been passed giving public utilities the right to the use of streets. He stated that portions of the statute referring to these rights are Minnesota 222.27, 300.03, 300.04, 300.05, 300.06, and that all these parts of the statute refer to the use by public utilities. Senator Root stated that if American Oil Company is allowed to use 3rd Street between 49th Avenue and. 53rd Avenue in the boulevard, then the Sinclair Oil Company and the Phillips Petroleum Company and all other oil companies will want to use this location in the street for the transport of their products. He stated that the City could stop them from using 3rd Street, that the oil companies have no right to to use the street. Senator Root stated that in the Minneapolis Brewing Company case, the Minneapolis Brewing Company made application for a tunnel to transport steam and water to be furnished to other private parties, and after the tunnel was built, used it for the transportion of bottles instead. He stated that there was no challenge to the use of this tunnel until prohibition when a private party, interested • in stopping the operations of the brewery, objected to the use of the tunnel. He stated that Waite, a Judge of the Supreme Court at the time, said that the tunnel could have been authorized for use by the Minneapolis Brewing Company if it were accessible for public convenience. He stated that this ruling may be found on-198 Minnesota. He stated that the case brought before the Supreme Court was an Action of Ejectment not an objection to construction of the tunnel, and an Action of Ejectment for the use of the tunnel was not proper, and therefore was denied by the court. Senator Root stated that Daniel's Digest, Volume 13 A, Page 115, contains a'case in which the court ruled that the City may authorize the use of a tunnel if the tunnel is accessible for public use. In 179 Minnesota Case Book, page 495, there is another case in which it was ruled that transport under the surface of the ground, not authorized for public use, could not be made available for private use. Mayor Nee asked Senator Root whether he made any statement concerning the authority granted by the City Charter to grant a franchise to American Oil Company for relocation of the pipeline. Senator Root stated that Section 101 of the City Charter grants the City the power to grant franchises to public utilities. He stated that Arvid Carlson and Sons own the underlying fee in the street, and he stated that if the American Oil Company has a right to run its pipeline in the public right -of -way, why do they not continue to run their pipeline in the Minnesota Highway Department right-cif-way. He stated that Arvid Carlson and Sons purposely dedicated a 49' wide street easement, because of a provision in the deed providing an easement to the American Oil Company to run their pipeline 49k' from the section quarter line, and the street • dedication purposely kept the American Oil Company easement out of the street right -of -way. Senator Root stated that the reason American Oil Company is using other public right -of -ways is that no one has objected to their use. He stated that a person can do anything to which no one else objects and get away with it. COUNCIL METING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE b Senator Root stated that he believes there is a real danger to the existence of a gasoline pipeline in the City street. He stated that the pavement is 354 wide and plans are to lay the pipeline in the boulevard, 306" below the surface of the ground. He stated that if there is a sewer back -up in one of the apartment buildings at any time, for example in the middle of the night, he will call a plumber and order him to dig up the boulevard in order to put the sewer back in operation, and if the plumber hits the pipeline, that entire portion of the City of Fridley could be obliterated. Mayor Nee asked how it is possible for the American Oil Company to transport its products across streets if it is illegal for them to use the public right - of -way. Senator Root stated that this pipeline started in Whiting, Indiana, and originally transported products to Moorhead, Minnesota. He stated that the American Oil Company extended the pipeline to Mandan, North Dakota, and. Is now transporting products from Mandan, North Dakota to Minneapolis. He stated that the American Oil Company can compel any government to allow them to cross public right -of -way, but that it would be necessary for American Oil Company to cross the public right -of -way where and at the direction of the particular government. Mayor Nee asked Senator Root whether the same argument would apply to a fee owner of the property. Senator Root replied that, that was correct. He stated that if in the future the City should vacate 3rd Street: the City will still be bound by the,frsnchise it grants to American Oil Company,, SenetOV Helot .stated .that the interests which he represents built a pipeline in the Village of St. Anttnony aaa aseded the right to cross the highway, which they had received from the Minnesota highway Department,but they had to locate it according to the wishes of the Minnesota Psighway b6partment. • Senator Donald Wright stated that he has not the slightest aoubt but what a pipeline is the safest method of transporting oil and gasoline and that the rule is that a member of the public can transport, under the surface of the soil, whatever he has a right to transport on the surface of the soil. He stated that when such transportation is made within City limits, the private party needs the consent of the City before transporting these goods. He stated that this applies to surface transportation as well as to sub - surface transportation. Senator Donald Wright stated that the only Question existing is how the American Oil Company can be accommodated to transport its product through the City of Fridley at this time, in view of the fact that it must relocate the pipeline from the Minnesota Highway Department right -of -way, and the failure to settle the question will hold up construction of T'.H. #47 in the City of Fridley. He stated that some solution must be found to this problem. Mr. Coggeshall stated that the American Oil Company has a permit from the City of Minneapolis to lay pipelines in the public right -of -way, and that as far as Sete for Root's argument is concerned, a plumber working in the.middle of the night who would dig up gasoline lines would either have to be extremely careless or extremely stupid. He stated that before any plumber would dig up the City street, he would check with the City Engineer concerning the location of pipelines in the street, and would be careful not to break them with his own backhoe.. • Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Coggeshall whether the American Oil Company has made an attempt to obtain'& private easement for re- location of the pipeline. COUNCIL METING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 5 Mr. Coggeshail stated that the American Oil Company has not made any attempt to do so up to this time because of the many property Demers from whom American Oil Company would have to purchase an easement, and because of the short time involved, it would be quicker to obtain an easement to locate the pipeline in the City streets than to run it across private property. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Coggeshall whether the City of Minneapolis has granted the American Oil Company a license, permit, or a franchise to use the public right -of -way. Mr. Tieste, another representative of the American Oil Company, stated that Minneapolis granted a permit for this use. Mayor Nee asked whether the City of Fridley could grant a permit to the American Oil Company, and whether this would solve the problem in lieu of granting a franchise to the American Oil Company. The City Attorney stated that granting a permit would create the same problem as granting a franchise. Mayor Nee asked if there were any other comments or questions concerning this issue. There were no other comments. Mayor Nee declared the hearing closed, and stated that he believes the Council will need an opinion from the City Attorney concerning this question. Motion by Wright to request the City Attorney to provide the Council with a summary of the case law concerning granting a franchise to American Oil Company for relocation of its pipeline in the public right -of -way, and the opinion of the City Attorney concerning the arguments presented by the American Oil Company, and by Arvid Carlson and Sons. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ON, RaVEMENT - STREETS 1966 -1; Mayor Nee stated that a Public Hearing has already been held concerning this project, but the Council is willing to hear the views of the property owners to establish whether the property owners want a specific street improved or riot. He stated that at the Public Hearing the property owners were given additional Information which they could use to decide whether they want to build these streets, and the Council is interested in hearing their opinions. 8728ETS IN RiVERVZBW HEIGHTS: Mayor Nee stated that the estimated cost of-construction of the streets in Riverview Heights is $9.40 per front foot including the cost of a• temporary paving surface on Riverview. Terrace. He stated that in addition to this cost, people may want a storm sewer system installed in Riverview Heights to avoid the use of valley gutters across Broad Avenue, and the cost of this storm sewer system would be assessed at an- .estimated rate of $2.65 per hundred square feet: If Riverview Terrace is not improved, the cost of construction is estimated . to be $8 jWi fret foot including the cost of catch basins located along Riverview 'Terrace to carry the water into the Mississippi River and avoid erosion of the river bank at Riverview Terrace. Councilman Wright stated that the Council may adopt the program with or without the improvement of Riverview Terrace and with or without the storm sewer to carry water across Broad Avenue. • A visitor to the Council Meeting asked whether the construction of the streets witLoat the storm sever would leave a pothole on Lafayette Street which would. collect water, and if there was some way of building up Lafayette Street and the C=CIL MEETING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 6 • rest of the streets, to avoid creating a pothole on Lafayette without construction of the storm sewer. The City Engineer anme3ed that it would be possible to raise the elevation of the streets such that there would be no pothole or low spot in the street, but by doing so the level of the street would be above that of some of the property along the street. Mayor Nee stated that the City received petitions for the construction of two of these streets,-and that these petitions were signed by more than 50% of the property owners on these two streets. He stated that the City Engineer proposed the Improvements of other streets because it Mould be possible for the City to obtain a better bid price if the improvement is larger. A visitor to the Council Meoting asked what the City would do since some of the property owners signed a petition for the improvement and also a petition against the improvement. Councilman Wright answered that the Council acknowledges the right of the Citizen to change his mnind,,and the Council would consider that the Citizen had signed the last petition received by the Council. Mayor Nee asked the visitors to the Council Meeting how many favor construction of the streets without the construction of the storm serer system and without the improvement of Riverview Terrace. A majority of those present favored the construction. Mayor Nee asked the visitors to the Council Meeting how many would prefer the construction of the storm sewer system. None of the property owners wanted the construction of the storm sewer system. Mayor Nee stated that he wished the property owners to understand that if the storm sewer system is not constructed, there will be valley gutters to carry the water across Broad Avenue. A visitor asked hoax reas)nable the construction cost of $8 per front foot is. Mayor Nee answered that construction costs in the City of Minneapolis are running about $13 per front foot. Councilman Sheridan stated that the cost of $8 per front foot is based upon comparable figures quoted for construction of streets in Street Program 1966 -1. Councilman Wright stated that the costs of street improvement are increasing approximately 15% per year, and the street construction would undoubtedly not be cheaper in the future than it is at the present time. The City Manager stated that most of the time of the grader operator is spent grading these streets, and paving these streets will reduce maintainence costs to the City. Mayor Nee asked if there were any property owners living on Riverview Terrace present at the Council Meeting. There were several property owners present and one of them stated that something should be done to improve Riverview Terrace. Councilman Thompson stated that he met with four or five different groups of property owners in Riverview Heights including 15 or 16 property owners in each group. He stated that-these property owners are concerned with paying for the improvement of Riverview Terrace and do not want to see Riverview Terrace Improved. Mayor Nee asked the visitors to the Council Meeting to indicate how marry favor the improvement of the streets in Riverview Heights and how many of them oppose it. Mayor Nee stated that, if the improvement is made, some people will be hurt, and if the improvement is not made, some people will be hurt. He stated that 19 property owners favor the improvement and 11 are opposed to it. A visitor to the Council Meeting asked whether Lafayette Street would be Included in this improvement. Mayor Nee stated that a petition for the improvement COUNCIL MEETING, DECE14MR 6, 1965 PAGE 7 of Lafayette Street had been received by the Council only this evening, and that it would be necessary for the Council to hold a Public Hearing on the Improvement of Lafayette Street before deciding whether it should be included in this program. He stated that it would still be possible to add Lafayette Street to Street Construction Program 1956 -1. Motion by Wright that Street Project 1966 -1 include the improvement of Kimball Street from Riverview Terrace to East River Road, of Janesville Street fropt Riverview Terrace to East River Road, of Ironton Street from Riverview Terrace to East River Road, of Hugo Street from Riverview Terrace to East River Road, of Glencoe Street from Riverview Terrace to East Raver Road, and of Broad Avenue from Glencoe Street to Kimball Street, but exclude the improvement of Riverview Terrace and construction of a storm sewer system in Riverview Heights except for the drainage facility to carry water from Riverview Terrace to the Mississippi River. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote., there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 75TH AVENUE: OW CENsMAb AVMIUE TO BACON DRIVE: Virginia Conrad was present at the Council Meeting acid stated that she favors the construction of 75th Avenue. 63RD AVENUE AND PIERCE STREET TO STATE AID SST #302 IN SHM=OOD SHOPPING =Mo. Mr. and Mrs. Leighton Clark were present at the Council Meeting and stated that they are the only people living on 63rd Avenue. They stated that the purpose • of this improvement is only to fill in the hole on Pierce Street and that the improvement will probably be helpful to their property. Mayor Nee pointed out that these people own only Lot 2 and there are three other lots on 63rd Avenue which will be included in this improvement. He asked Mr. and Mrs. Clark if they would favor the improvement if it were extended west on 63rd Avenue from Pierce Street. The property owners indicated that they would be in favor of such improvement. May- STRSETI FRiDIEY STET. ANOKA STREET AND 66TH AVENUE: Six visitors to the Council Meeting opposed construction of Fridley Street, Anoka Street, and 66th Avenue. They stated that they believe more than 509, of the property owners are opposed to the improvement of these streets. Councilman Wright stated that the.City received petitions signed by 907, of the property owners on McKinley Street, 809, of the property otmers on 66k Avenue, 50% on 66th Avenue and 83% on Stinson Boulevard favoring the construction of these streets. One of the visitors stated that he believes the property owners would sign a petition for improvement of these streets only if a storm sewer system were built in the area. Councilman Wright stated that from talking to these property owners he has gained the impression that the people would favor the improvement of the streets only if the storm sewer is not built. He stated that people,do not want to pay for the cost of construction of a stoma sewer. Councilman Wright stated that the City could not pave portions of these streets alone, but the City must pave the entire area if.the City is to obtain a low cost for the pavement of these streets. He stated that if the City paves only the chunks of !I streets where individual property owners want to see the abutting street improved, the cost of paving these small portions would be prohibitive to the property owners. COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PACE 8 Councilman Sheridan stated that•the property owners have requested construction of a storm sewer system to drain into Moore Lake. He stated that the City has authorised the Consulting Enginear to make a study of such a storm sewer system and will consider construction of the system wbon the study is completed. Councilman Wright asked the visitors haw many are present at the Council Meeting who were not present at the Public Hearing. Three visitors indicated that they Vera not present at the Public Bearing. They stated that they opposed the construction of this improvement. Councilman Wright asked how many of these visitors awn the same property. Two of them owned one parcel of property. Councilman Wright stated that adding these two property owners to the list of those opposed to the construction of this inprovnt at the Public Hearing, leaves a ratio of two to one in favor of construction of this improvement. Motion by Thompson to delete from Street Improvement Project 1966 -1, McKinley Street from 66th Avenue to 66', Avenue, 661 Avenue from the alley between Fridley Street and McKinley Street to Stinson Boulevard, Fridley Street from Mississippi Street to 67th Avenue, Anoka Street from Mississippi Street to 67th Avenue, 66th Avenue from McKinley Street to Stinson Boulevard, 66th Avenue from Arthur Street to McKinley Street, Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a roll call vote, Kirkham and Thompson voting aye, Mayor Nee, Sheridan and Wright voting nay, the motion failed. Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #201 -1965 as presented in the agenda of the Council Meeting with the exception of Riverview Terrace and a storm serer system in Riverview Heights. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a roll call vote, all voting aye,`the motion carried. SIGN FRXLT APPLICATION .BURGER KING COMPANY TABLED 11/8/65, 11/15165): Mr. Sandberg and Mr. Curtis Bostrom were present at the Council Meeting .representing the Fridley Covenant Church. They stated that they are concerned about the construction of this sign since they do not believe such a large sign will look very good near their church. Mayor Nee invited the representatives of the Fridley Covenant Church to examine the plans for construction of the sign, and noted that the sign is proposed to be 288 high and 208 vide. Mr. Sandberg asked whether the National Tea Store will build a sign in front of their building. Mayor Nee stated that their sign will probably be the same as the previous sign which National Tea had in front of the store Mayor Nee stated further that it might be possible for the Council to induce Burger King Company to,move the sign elsewhere. He stated that the Council asked Burger King Company.to bring in plans for construction of a smaller sign but Burger King has failed to do so, Motion by Wright to deny the application of Huber Sign Company for a permit to construct a sign for a Burger King Company restaurant at 64th Avenue and University Avenue West Service Drive Northeast. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. QRDiNLVNCE ADOPTING SIGN REGULATIONS: Mr. Robert Christianson was present representing the Chamber of Commerce. . Councilman Wright asked Mr. Christianson whether the Chamber of Commerce has bad a chance to review the revised version of the sign ordinance. Mr. Christianson answered, "Yes." The City Attorney stated that the revised version of the ordinance incorporates all the suggestions made to the Council for changes in the sign ordinance including insertion of a grandfather clause-into the sign COUNCIL HZTING, DECKER 6, 1965 PACZ 9 ordinance. Councilman Wright noted that there is a mistake in the ordinance given on page 67 of the Council Meeting agenda, namely in sub - paragraph 2s C -1 and C -IS Districts, part d. provides that the height of a sign to to be restricted so as not to obliterate a neighboring business. He stated that he believes the word obliterate should be mask or obscure. Mayor Nee stated that there is a question concerning the annual permit to maintain a sign In the City of Fridley. He stated that the reason the Council wishes to require the annual permit is to prevent signs from remaining upon the landscape after the Treason for the sign is long gone. Mayor Nee stated that the annual permit renewal would require sign owners to indicate to the City that they were Interested in maintaining the tign upon the premises. He stated that it would be possible, administratively, to check whether a sign owner renewed his permit, and if he did root, to ask him if he were interested in continuing maintenance upon this sign, and inform him that if he did not renew his permit for the sign or maintain the sign, the City would remove the sign from the property. Councilman Wright stated that he does not believe the City will take any precipitous action concerning sign owners who do not immediately renew permits for signs. He stated that the fee could be adjusted to cover only the administrative costs of making this check upon the sign owners. Robert Christianson asked whether the section of the ordinance requiring a sign owner to maintain the sign would not provide the mean& to prevent old signs from remaining in place. He stated that the Building Inspector could examine all the signs in the City of Fridley periodically, and order property owners to maintain those signs not in good condition. He stated that the property owner who is then ordered to maintain a sign in which he was no longer interested might state that he no longer wants the sign, or his failure to maintain it would give the City the right to remove the sign. The City Manager stated that if this procedure were follwed, there would be more cost and more work for the City, namely, the inspection time required to examine all these signs, than there would be by checking permits and determining the number of sign owners who failed to renew a permit. Mr. Christianson asked what is the purpose of the fee for this permit. Council- man Wright answered that the purpose of the fee is to pay the City the cost of keeping the books and records. Mayor Nee stated that it could be done without a fee. Mr. Christianson asked the Council whether they were interested only in the aesthetics of the suss. Councilman Wright answered that, if a sign along a roadway is not meaningful, it distracts the drivers attention, and whereas the City is not opposed to signs upon the roadway that are meaningful and provide an automobile driver with useful information, if a sign does not provide his with any useful information, the sign is an unnecessary distraction to his driving. Councilman Wright stated that he believes the question of obtaining sufficient maintenance of the sign refers more to billboards than to signs located on buildings. He stated that where the building is in use, the property owner would not retain a sign which is no longer meaningful on the building, but that the billboards are often left in place years after the business advertised on the billboard is no longer in existence. He suggested that item 3 under the renewal permit be restricted to billboards. Mr. Chridianson stated that he believes this would be satisfactory with members of the Chamber of Commerce. COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 10 Councilman Kirkham asked whether it would be possible to adopt the ordinance ,upon first reading at this Council Meeting and have the City Attorney revise the ordinance according to the information obtained at this Council Meeting before presenting it to the Council for second reading. The City Attorney stated that he believes he could do so and that even with all the changes proposed in the sign ordinance as it was presented to the Council at this meeting, it is stronger than ordinances regulating signs at the present time. Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney whether it would be reasonable to insert a cut -off date in the grandfather clause after which the grandfather clause would no longer apply to certain signs. The City Attorney stated that he believes it would be possible to do so. He said that the City did the same thing in regard to the operation of hog farms, when the City informed the property owner that he could operate a hog farm in the City limits for one more year and extended the permit for only the additional year. Notion by Thompson to adopt the ordinance regulating signs upon first reading. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. PROPOSED EkiD%WCZ HOUSING C0DE Motion by Kirkham to table consideration of the Ordinance adopting the Uniform Housing Code to the Special Council Meeting of December 13, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • POSSIAR PURCHUM OF. PARK PROPERTY LMLED 11115165) s Motion by Sheridan to table consideration of the purchase of park property to the Special Council Meeting of December 13, 1965. Seconded by Kirkh -m. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BIDS - 3/4 TOR TRUCK (OPENED NOW, DECEMBER 6, 1965) the City Manager gave each Council member a copy of the following list of Was BIDDER CASE PRICE TRADE -IN NE_ T PRICE DEL. WE Major Ford Ford F250 $300.00 $2,347.00 45 -60 Days $2,647.00 KI&vy Ford Ford F250 $250.19 $2,784.00 6 days McGee Truck GNC X-1502 $425.00 $2,732.17 45 days Auoka International lat. D1200 $1,173.35 $2,500.00 75 Days Iten Chev. Cbev. X2534 $2,979.58 : $800.00 $20179.00 45 Days Matson by Wright to receive the report of the Parks and Recreation Department and authorise the purchase of a Chevrolet K -2534 3/4 ton truck from Iten Chevrolet in the amount of $2,179 with trade -yin of the 1957 Jeep. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 11 BIDS - MOM LAKE TENNIS COURTS OPENED NOON.- DECEMBER 6 196 The City Manager read the following list of bidet BIDDER LUMP SUM BID COMMT109 DATE Carlson- Levine Construction $5,655.00 June 1, 1966 Dunkley Surfacing Co. $4,455.64 June 10, 1966 C. S. NeCrossan, Inc. $5,167.25 June 10, 1%6 Motion by Wright to award the contract for construction of tennis courts on Moore Lake Beach to Dunkley Surfacing Co., in the amount of $4,455.64. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a.voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unani- mously. MVQG 0"0[ =SZON MBEITNG MINMS - NOVEMBER 18, 19651 W-W MT _FX2.M M2 L ,S. f64-OS. ORVIZU BATLEY r i r.�.rrn�� Mr. Ratley was present at the Council Meeting and explained his request for a lot split. Councilman Wright asked Mr. Ratley Whether he agrees with the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the City red -tag the two lots. until the present structure upon the present three lots is removed. Mr. Ratley answered, "Yes." There was a discussion of which way a house would face if the . lots were split as requested by Mr. Ratley, The Council was unable to settle this question and a discussion ensued whether the question might be settled when an application is made for a Building Permit for construction upon these lots. Motion by Wright to concur with the Planning Commission and grant the Lot Split #64 -08 to Orville Ratley of Lots 13,14 and 15, Block 16, Hamilton** Addition to Mechanicsville as shoan.on the Certificate of Survey (File 5298, Book No. 1704 -24), splitting the lots north and south, upon the condition that the City be allowed to red -tag the corner lot and when an application for a Building Permit for this lot is made, the request will be put on the agenda of the Building Board for approval by the Building Board and the Council. Seconded by Sheridan for purposes of discussion. Councilman Sheridan stated that, as a result of this motion, the City is obligated to give some kind of a Building Permit for construction on these two lots. He stated that it would be better to examine the Building Permit request first, and then decide whether the lot split should be made. Upon a voice vote, Councilman Sheridan and Councilman Thompson voting aye, Councilman Wright, Councilmen Kirkham, and Mayor Nee voting nay, the motion failed. SOT SPLIT RS2MST1 L.S. #65, 10,, VERNON R. L.ARSON The City Manager stated that Mr. Larson called and requested that consideration of the Lot Split be laid over to another time. C� 6 The City Engineer stated that the City has not received a good Certificate of Survey for this property. ' - : -. .. _ v ';; ,. ;.. ..': >. � .. dF - . - �� , ,� JL,` r .t -: • _ ;.' G 1.. . � ,. - -.... .; ..a ,� - v-. �. r .. . . • . :: ...: . ... �. � i Y { • COUNCIL NMTiNG, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PACZ 12 Motion by Aright to table consideration of LoL Split request #65 -16 of Allen G. Jensen pending receipt of a Certificate of Survey. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. The City Attorney stated that it will be necessary for the Council to set a date for a Public Hearing to consider the easement vacation. Motion by Wright to set a Public Hearing for a Regular Council Meeting for consideration of the easement vacation request, SAV #65 -04, of Allen G. Jensen. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. The City Engineer stated that Mr. Hall did not prevent an adequate Certificate of Survey to the City when he made this request. He stated that Mr. Hall owns more than 1 acre of land, and that he is splitting a portion of the one,acre. He stated that Mr. Hall eventually needs to plat the entire piece of property and this is the reason why Mr. Hall is dedicating a portion of the property to the City for a street easement at the present time. Motion by Sheridan to table consideration of the Lot Split request of • Kenneth L. Ball, L.S. #65 -15, pending receipt of a Certificate of Survey. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee stated that he believes the Council should try to help this property owner resolve the problem. He stated that there is an existing building upon this property, and the property owner may wish to split the remainder of this property into two additional lots. The City Engineer stated that the lot split would result in small lots for commercial buildings, and the property owner would probably treed a. waiver of the front yard setback requirement. The City Engineer stated further that the existing building of the property owner is only two feet from the street right -of -way. Mayor Nee noted that an easement existed or was shmm upon the back of this lot and asked whether the City or the neighboring property owners want this easement. Councilman. Sheridan stated that the minutes note that Mr. Nygard has obtained a Quit Claim Deed for this part of the easement from Mr. Lesson, the neighboring property owner. Mayor Neer asked whether it would be unreasonable to send the request back to the Planning Cammission and ask them to consider a Lot Split such that one of the lots would be 100 4x1321, the total property to be split into only two lots. Lotion by Kirkham to refer consideration of Lot Split request L.S. x`65 -14, of • H. X. Nygard back to the Planning Commission. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nave, the motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL M MMG, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 13 • PUBLIC HOUSING FOR THE AG® t The City Manager noted that Mr. Danielson had suggested to the Planning Commission that the Federal Housing and Redevelopment Authority be asked to study the use of Federal funds for construction of a home -for the aged in the City of Fridley. The City Manager stated that the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that construction of this home be referred to the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Mayor Nee stated that he did not believe the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority would be interested In such a project. Motion by Thompson to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and refer the question of building Senior Citizen housing with Federal financing to the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, Councilman Kirkham voting nay, the motion carried. FUTtlRB REZONING% Councilman Wright stated that he talked to Mr. Flodue, and Mr. Hodge stated that he was willing to study the proposed rezoning of the area west of University Avenue and east of the Railroad tracks between 69th Avenue Northeast and the City limii;s. Mr. Hodge informed Councilman Wright that it is only necessary for the Council to request Hodge and Associates to make this study. Motion by Wright to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and request Hodne and Associates to study the area west of University Avenue • and east of the Railroad tracks between 69th Avenue Northeast and the City limits for possible rezoning of this property. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. C—M—M- UATIOU OF THE #701 PROGRAM: Notion by Wright that the Council request Hodge and Associates to report to the Council on the status of the 701 program. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. OR OF APPEALS MEETING MIMMS - DECEMBER 1. 19653 Councilman Sheridan showed the Council a drawing of the proposed construction of the home of Mr. and Mrs. Belgum, and plans for construction of the house. Motion by Sheridan to grant the request of Mr. and Mrs. Belgum for a waiver of the front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet to permit construction of a one family dwelling on Lot 11, Block 1, Marion Hills Addition. Seconded by Wright. • Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • • COUNCIL MISTING, DECEbM 6, 1965 PAGE 14 Councilman Wright noted that this request for a Variance would create a living area 5 feet from the neighboring property. He asked what kind of living area the property owner inte:ids to build in the existing garage. The City Manager answered that the property owner plans to convert the garage into a den. Councilman Wright asked if the neighbors stated whether they approve or object %to this proposed construction. The City Manager stated that the neighbors were not present at the Board of Appeals Meeting,and made no objection to the construction. Councilman Wright stated that he believes the City should be more stringent or at least as stringent in granting a sideyard variance when it is proposed to change the use to a living area, than the City is when granting a variance for construction of a garage. Mayor Nee asked whether Kenneth Johnsen was present at the Council Meeting. Kenneth Johnsen was not present at the Council Meeting. Motion by Thompson to table to the Special Council fleeting of December 13, 1965, the request of Kenneth Johnsen for a waiver of the side yard requirement to permit remodeling an attached garage into a living area, and ask the City Manager to get all the information needed for the Council to consider his request. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Gnerre was not present at the Council Meeting. Motion by Kirkham to concur with the Board of Appeals and grant the request of Minnesota Finishing Company for a waiver of the front yard setback from 100 feet to 44 feet 6 inches, to permit construction of an addition to the industrial building at 161 Ely Street Northeast. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. SAFETY CO[d MTTEE MEETING MINUTES Z NOVI MBER 10, 1965: Motion by Kirkham to receive and file the minutes of the Safety Committee Meeting of November 10, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. SAM ,COMMITTEE MEETING M11R=S, NOVEMBER 17, 19652 The City Manager stated that the City is complying with all the requests made • by the Safety Committee in these minutes. Councilman Kirkham stated that while he respects the decision of the Safety Committee concerning the school traffic signal at 61st Avenue Northeast and 7th Street, he would like to ask the City to turn the signal on earlier and leave it on longer. The City Manager stated that this could be done. Councilman Kirkham suggested that the signal be COUNCIL t1BTINGg DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 15 . turned on on Saturday. Councilman Wright suggested that the signal be referred to, not as a school pedestrian signal, but as a park signal. The City Manager stated that if the signal were I turned on on Saturday,'people would assume that the school traffic signal was left on inadvertently, that the signal should not be operative and would ignore the signal to the hazard of anyone depending upon the signal to cross the street. Motion by Thompson to receive and file the minutes of the Safety Committee Meeting of November 17, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BiNG WM IiE8TING MINU=S - DECEMBER I L 19651 - AnDTTTnN lnnax154i Motion by Wright to concur with the recommendation of the Building Board and grant the request of Northeast Mobile Hones for a permit to construct an addition to the rear of the existing building at 7501 Viron Road with the condition that the structure match the existing one in pattern and color. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Ir • Councilman Wright stated that the Safety Committee is concerned about the number of access drives onto E.st River Road. He stated that the plans for construction of the two four -unit apartment houses do not include provision for parking lot exits onto 77th instead of East River Road. He suggested that there are several plane which the property owner might adopt to provide for access to the parking lot from 77th Avenue rather than East River Road. He suggested that one alternative is that traffic enter the parking lots from East River Road, but leave the parking lots from 77th. Councilman Sheridan stated that he would suggest that there be one access from East River Road to the two parking lots between the two apartment buildings instead of two. The representative of Metropolitan Design stated that he does not believe there Is enough room between the two apartment buildings to establish two driveways into the parking lots, but that it is necessary to have two driveways into the parking lots such that each apartment building could be sold separately. Councilman Wright suggested that a covenant could be included in the conveyance to the buyer of the apartment buildings for an easement of the driveway on the adjoining apartment building lot. The representative of Metropolitan Design stated that if this were done it would make it more difficult to sell the two apartment buildings. Councilman Wright suggested that the two apartment buildings be sold together instead of selling them to separate owners. The representative of the Metropolitan Design stated that he might wish to do that. The representative of Metropolitan Design stated that he wished to have the Council approve the Building Permit at this Council Meeting so the contractor could begin construction of the apartment buildings immediately, since the weather has been unusually good this late in the season. • Motion by Kirkham to concur with the recommendations of the Building Board and grant the request of Metropolitan Design for a Building Permit for construction of two four -unit apartment houses on the south corner of 77th Way and East River Road Northeast. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 16 4p BUILDING PSRW APPLICATION - INDUSTRIAL BUILDING MINNESOTA FINISHING COWANY 161 ELY STREET NORTHEAST Motion by Wright to apprcrre the request of Minnesota Finishing Company for a Building Permit for construction of an addition to the industrial building at 161 Ely Street Northeast. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION - ACME METAL SPINNING COWA14Y - 98 - 43RD AVENUE NORTHEAST: - Motion by Thompson to approve the application of Acme Metal Spinning Company for a Building Permit for construction of a canopy over the loading dock at their property at 9$ - 43rd Avenue Northeast. 'Secoaded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. WILDING, PERMIT APPLICATION - ADDITION TO PLYWOOD MINNF�SOTA C�tPANY: i �.....- ..�r.oM.......r r A representative of Plywood Minnesota Company was present at the Council Meeting. Councilman Wright asked him why Plywood Minnesota Company built this building without a permit. The representative Stated that the building was put up during an emergency'in order to enclose additional inventory. Councilman Wright stated that after the emergency was passed the building should have been brought up to code or destroyed, the construction of this building is a violation of the law, and the building should be brought up to code. Councilman Kirkham asked the representative how long the Plywood • Minnesota Company plans to continue using this building. The representative stated that the building will be destroyed when an additional railroad spur is run onto the property through the building to serve Plywood Minnesota Company. The City Attorney stated that the law requires that a Building Permit be taken out before a property m-mer is allowed to build upon his property and that a definite procedure must be followed by the applicant. The City Attorney suggested that Plywood Minnesota supply a plan to bring the building up to code and ask for a building permit to do so. Councilman Wright stated that the Council is willing to forgive the violation of the law by Plywood Minnesota in constructing the building without a permit provided that Plywood Minnesota brings the building into compliance with the City code. Motion by Wright that the City Council require Plywood Minnesota Company to present a plan to the Council to bring the construction of the temporary building to the standards of the City Code, based upon reports made by the Building Inspector and the Fire Inspector, the report to include a description of the use Plywood Minnesota intends for the building. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously.. TUDLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10. 1965; Motion by Wright to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of November 10, 1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY =TING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 17, 1965: Motion by Wright to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of November 17, 1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL MISTING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 17 FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REDDMLOP14M AUTHMiTY MMTrI aG IMNUTES - NOVSt413ER 23, 1965: Motion by Wright to receive and file the minutes of the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting of November 23, 1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. CI1�IIlS: Motion by Sheridan to approve General and Public Utilities Claims #7229 through #7328 for payment. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Notion by Thompson to approve Liquor Claims #8012 through #8078 for payment. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. BST 798t Notion by Thompson to approve the following estimates for payments Karl Dedolph Construction Company 771 West Seventh Street St. Paul, Minnesota Water Improvement Project No. 75 -8 (Booster Station - 63rd Avenue N.B. & T.H. #100) (FINAL) $ 2,341.75 • Keys Well Drilling Company 413 North Lexington Parkway St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Water Improvement Project No. 75 -A (Three additional drift wells) (PARTIAL) $ 7,645.27 Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Notion by Sheridan to approve the license applications listed in the Council agenda and append the list to the minutes. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Notion by Sheridan to receive Petition #32 -1965 and refer it to the Administration for processing. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no vulyb, the motion carried unanimously. P$?3W 03 -1965 - OPPOSIN STT II OVB1d�NT PROJECT 1966 -1 ON SLIGO STW= • Notion by Sheridan to receive Petition #33 -1965 and refer it to the Adniaistration for processing. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the notion carried unanimously. CO MCIL MSRTING, DECE14WR 6, 1965 PAGE IS Motion by Sheridan to receive Petition #35 -1965 and refer it to the Administration for processing. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no says, the motion carried unanimously. PETITION #34 -1965 - FOR DOROVEHENT OF ROAD AND STMH SEWER IN RIVERVIN TSB CEI Motion by Sheridan to receive Petition #34 -1965 and refer it to the Administration for processing. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no aays, the mQioa carried unanimously. BIDS FOR CLW UP Og LOM PARK; The City Manager explained the bide as received, to the City Council, and stated that the City estimates there are 336 man hours of work and 144 equipment hours to complete the Locke Party clean-up. He stated that if the reco=enda.tion of the University of Minnesota Extension Service is followed, the cost to the City to award the contract to Minnesota Tree would be $1500 greater than the cost .of awarding the contract to the lowest bidder. He stated that the City has obtained a great deal of help and advice from the State of Minnesota Department of Conservation and the Extension Service of the University of Minnesota and finds their recommendations to be quite helpful. Motion by Wright to award a contract to Minnesota Tires for cleanup of Locke Park in the estimated amount of $11,433. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Sheridan to adopt the Ordinance amending Section 46.01 upon first reading. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 1 Motion by Sheridan to adopt Resolution #202 -1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 1 Motion by Sheridan to adopt Resolution #203 -1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Thompson to adopt Resolution #204 -1965. Seconded by Wright. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. n l�1 COUNCIL MEETING, =R= 6, 1965 PACE 19 Motion by Kirkham to adopt Resolution #205 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Wright to adopt Resolution #206 -1965. Seconded by Thompson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Kirkham to approve Resolution #207 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Thompson to approve Resolution #208 -1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION - CU MRON, INC. - 73RD AND MaVERSITY AVENUE NORTHEAST: 4D Councilman Kirkham noted that the size of the sign meets the maximum size stipulated by the proposed Sign Ordinance. Councilman Sheridan asked whether the sign which Clemron, Inc. wants to build would be the same as the other billboard which Clemron, Inc. built previously. Councilman Kirkham answered, "Yes." Councilman Wright suggested that the sign application of Clemron, Inc. be approved subject to conformance with the sign ordinance undQr consideration by the City Council. Motion by Kirkham to approve the application of Clemron, Inc. for a permit to construct a sign at 73rd Avenue and University Avenue Northeast subject to conformance with the proposed Sign Ordinance. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. APPOINTMENTS TO THE NEW PARKS AND RECREATION CfJMl►tISSION; Motion by Thompson to table consideration of.the appointments to the Parks and Recreation Commissiva to the Special Council Meeting of December 13, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Motion by Thompson to table consideration of the appointments of new City employees to the Special Council Meeting of December 13, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. • CMH=CAT10N MWMSOrA HIGHWAY DEPARTHM: DRAINAGE ON MISSISSIPPI STREET: COUECIL METING, DECEMBER 6, 1965 PAGE 20 Motion by Thompson to table consideration of the Minnesota Highway Department communication concerning drainage on Mississippi Street to the Special Council Meeting of December 13, 1955. Seconded by Y rkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. FIMCE DUMCTOR ,,. SE-OER Ci RGES: Motion by Thompson to table consideration of the memo from the Finance Director concerning abatement of setae:: charges against trailer house lots damaged by the tornado to the Special Council meeting of December 13, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. MOUNDSViEW: FISH HOUSES: Motion by Thompson to table consideration of the proposed ordinance from the Village of Moundsview forbidding the erection of fish houses on Spring Lake to the Special Council Meeting of December 13, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there beisag no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Ti MSOTA HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: CROSSOVER AT 61ST AVENUE NORTHEAST AND TH. #65: Motion by Thompson to table consideration of the Minnesota Highway Department memo concerning the crossover of T.H. #65 at 61st Avenue Northeast to the Special Council Meeting of December-13, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote,,there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS.-, BINGO: Motion by Thompson to table consideration of the bingo permit for the Knights of Columbus to the Special Council Meeting of December 13, 1965. Seconded by Kirkham. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE #317- RECONSIDERATION: Motion by Wright to table consideration of the reconsideration of Ordinance #317 to the Special Council Meeting of December 13, 1965. Seconded by Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURPIMBNT: There being no further business, Mayor Nee declared the Regular Council Meeting of December 6, 1965 adjourned at 1 :33 A.M. Respectfully submitted, ;r Raymond E. Bade Secretary to the Council 0 OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC IMRINC BEFORE THE CITY COUIICIL TO WHW IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that there will be a public hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 Univer- sity Avenue Northeast on December 20, 1965 in the Council Chamber at 8 :00 P.M., for the purpose of: Consideration of the final plat (P.S. #62 -10R) Commerce Park, Mike Hafner, being that part of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, T -30, R -24 lying South of the center line of Osborne Road and lying West of the center line of State Trunk Highway No. 47 (also known as University Avenue); also Lot 4, and that part of Lot 5, Revised Auditors Subdivision tTo. 77, lying South of the center line of Osborne Road as now laid out and located, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Anoka County, Minnesota. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be beard at this meeting. Publish: December 1, 1965 December 8, 1965 • WILLIAM: J. TIER MAYOR 21 22 JOSEPH E. WARGO Y' f PETER BARNA 7 •ROBERT GUZY ROBERT C. HYNES S. J. SOKOLOWSKI December 9, 1965 Mr. Earl Wagner City Manager City of Fridley LAW OFFICES WARGO & BARNA 3700 CENTRAL AVE. N. E. MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. 55421 Re: E & M Develpment Co - Commerce Park PHONE: 788-1644 0 Dear Mr. Wagner: I am certain that you are familiar with the previous developments and his- tory of that tract of land commonly known as Commerce Park lying West-of University Avenue and extending from Osborne Road South to 73rd Avenue N;. As you know, that tract is as of this time, unplatted and there are substan- tial taxes and special ".assessments due and also that a plat has now been pre- ' pared and is being submitted to the City Council of the City of Fridley during the month of December, 1965. It becomes imperative that a procedure is effected whereby the plat may be filed of record and the real estate tax made current. It is my understanding that some time ago the City Council of theCity of • Fridley has indicated that they would abate the special assessments existing as against the entire tract and would upon approval of the plat, then file a new assessment roll based on the particular lots in the plat. I am positive that the best practical interest of the City of Fridley as well as of E & M Development Company would be best served by such aprocedure, and therefor, I should appreciate your considering this as a formal petition by E & M Develop- ment Company to the City of Fridley requesting an abatement and re- assessment based upon the new plat, of such special assessments as have heretofore been levied against the above desbribed tract. I should be very willing to meet with you, the City Attorney, or such repre- sentatives of the City as would be the proper parties to properly resolve this matter, at such time as would meet the convenience of the City. " I have not included the legal description herein as the same is quite lengthy, but would be willing to supply you the same at your request; and I am certain that the proper legal description is now before the City by reason of the sub- mission of the proposed plat. Thanking you for your considerations herein, and awaiting your further advice hereon, I remain, Very truly yours, E kXiEVELOPMENT COMPANY Tos ph E. Wargo, rotary mh1 RESOLUTION NO. 211 -1965 0 A RESOLUTI01I AUTHORIZITIG THE A110KA COMITY AUDITOR TO A13ATE ASSESSREiITS Oil COMMERCE PARIC LAUD AREA MID TO RESPREAD THE ASSESSIOUTS AMR TM PLAT OF COM ERCI: PARK HAS BEET) RECORDED. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fridley, after exhaustive hearings, has given final approval to the.plat of Commerce Park; AND WHEREAS, a Public purpose is served by having the plat filed so that pivots of land are available for industrial development NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDIEY AS FOLD O(fS a 1e That the County Auditor of Anoka County be authorized and directed to abate the special assessments now levied upon the land area comprising Commerce Park,. 20 That the City Finance Director be authorized and directed to split the assessments now existing on said land area equitably upon the various lots in Commerce Park and file said new assessment roll promptly with the Anoka County Auditor. ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF DE( R, 1965a BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF FRIDiEY. ATTEST Marvin C. Brunsell, Clerk 9 WILLIAM J. NEE$ MAYM .Z2 aZ A • OFFICIAL 110TICE CITY OF FRIDrLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COU14CIL TO WHOM IT HAY COT-XMaJ: Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 Univ- sity Avenue N.E. on December 20, 1965 in the Council Chamber at 8:00 P.M. for the purpose of: Consideration of a request by Hike hafner, EOA #65 -09, to rezone from R -2 (limited multiple family dwelling), R -3 (general multiple family dwelling) and M -1 (light industrial areas) to C -2 (general business areas) the following described parcel: all that portion of the Northwest Quarter (19-1k) of Section 11, lying South of Osborne Road and lying West of State Trunk highway #47 and lying East of a line drawn parallel to and 290 feet West of State Trunk highway* 447, this area to be known aF • Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 17, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3, Commerce Park upon the plat "s final approval. To rezone from M -2 (heavy industrial area) to X -1 (light industrial area) the following described parcel: all that portion of the Northwest Quarter (IS314) of Section 11 lying South of Osborne Road and lying West of a line drawn parallel to and 290 feet West of State Trunk highway #47 and East of Commerce Lane as shown in the proposed plat of Commerce Park: this area to be known as Lots 18 through 29, Block 2, Commerce Park upon the plat's final approval. All lying in City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State.of Minnesota. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. Publish: December 1, 1965 December 8, 1965 40 WILLIMI J. NEE MAYOR 23 OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLSY PUBLIC HBARIWa BLFOBS THB CITY COUNCIL TO 19HOR IT MAY COMRSs NOTICE IS =MY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Fridley will most in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at Ss00 o'clock P.M., Monday, December 20, 1965, to considw the following matters A request for a SpWJA1 Use POS it to PerUit construction of a Nursing Herat in an R -1 District on Outlot 1. Melody Ranee (Southwest coaenIr 200' x 600'), Anoka County. Minnesota as per City Code of Fridley, Minnesota 1963, revised to Deceaber 31. 1964, section 45.19 2 -d. (Request by Mike Hafne►r, 7400 Highway #65 Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota). Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. Publish& Dectnber S, 1965 10 w ec 15, 1965 n WILLIAM J. am Mid OR 24 • OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDR.EY PUBLIC THUMNG BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that there Will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on December 20, 1965 in the Council Chamber at 5 :00 P.M. for the purpose of; Consideration of a request by Mike Hafner (ZOA•#65 -08)' to rezone from R -1 (single family dwelling) to R -3A (general multiple family dwelling) that part of Outlot No. 1, Melody Manor, 4th Addition described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast (NE) corner of said Outlot No. 1; thence South along the Bast line of Said Outlot No. 1 to the South line; thence West along the South line of said Outlot No. 1 a distance of 190 feet; thence • North parallel to the West line of said Outlot No. 1 a distance of 202.01 feet; thence West parallel to the North line of said Outlot No. l a distance of 382.20 feet; thence North parallel to the West line a distance of 227.30 feet; thence East parallel to the North line of said Outlot No. 1 a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North parallel to the West line of said Outlot No. 1 a distance of 150.00 feet to the North line of said Outlot No. 1; thence last along the North line of said Outlot No. 1, 234.09 feet to the point of beginning; thence terminating, all lying in Section It, T -30, R -24, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. Publish: December 1. 1965 December 8, 1963 0 W=1AM J. NEE MAYOR 26 OFFICIAL wrYCZ CITY OF mum PUBLIC RRAUNG DZYM Tea CITY COUNCIL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCW o. Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City hall at 6431 University Avenue N.L. on December 20, 1965 in the Council Chamber at 8:00 P.M. for the purpose oft Consideration of a request by Mike Aafner to rezone from B -1 (single family dwelling) to C -1 (local business areas) ZOA #65 -08, that part of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addi- tion described as follows Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Outlot 1, thence East along the North line of said Outlot 1 a distance of 217.82 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence continue East along the North • line of said Outlot 1, a distance of 330 feet; thence South on a line parallel to.the Hest line of-said Outlot l a distance of 150 feet; thence Hest parallel to the North line of said Outlot l a distance of 330 feet; thence North parallel to the West line of said Outlot 1, 150 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence terminating,-all lying in Section 11, T -30, 1 -24, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. Publisht December 1, 1965 December 8, 1965 0 WILLIAM J. Nib MAYOR 27 U PlannipA Qm=issioax Meetin - November 18 1965 Page 2 i i 1 .ca Mr. Bandel explained that the original request was for four lots, but that the Plate and Subdivisions Sub -Cam ittee felt the lots were too mall and suggested that the parcel be split into three lots. Mr. Larson agreed to this. fl-, MAO ON by Johanson, seconded by Bandel, that the Planning Commirrion�6 � concur with the Plats and Subdivisions Sub - Committee and reco and Tot Fplitt'� M-10, Vernon B. Larson, beiap- the East 273 feet of Lot 14. Auditors Sub- division 0129 together with easemmt over North 30 feet of Lot l4, int Wert of East 273 feat vlittinm toe areal into three lots and red to the Easterly two lots until re=ovm1 of the present structure. Upon a voice vote, all voting ayo, the motion carried. l f Q - - N. S vl J ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR, ALTERATION, LOCATION OR MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS ' AND BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, PROVIDING ' FOR THE POSTING OF BONDS: THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND FEES THEREFOR, THE REVOCATION OF PERMITS: INSPECTION AND FEES THEREFOR: PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION. ` THEREOF: AND FOR REPEALING CITY CODE SECTION 45.06 SUBD. 8 AND ENACTING CHAPTER 56. The City Council of the City of Fridley do''ordain as followst J 1. There is hereby enacted a new Chapter of the City Code of Fridley as follows; 56. SIGN REGULATIONS 56.91 This ordinance "shall hereafter be known and cited as the "Sign Regulations ". • 56.02 DEFINITIONS. As used in this ordinance'unless the context•, otherwise indicates: (1) SIGN. The Term "Sign" shall mean a name,.identification, description, display, illustration, structure or device which is affixed to, - or painted, or represented directly or indirectly upon a building or other, outdoor surface or piece of land, and -which directs attention to an object,.'; product, place, activity, person, institution, organization or business. (2) SIGN. AUTOMOBILE SERVICE. The Term !'Automobile'Service Sign",,- means any sign that does not exceed 32 square feet directing the motorist travelling along the.highway to p place or places catering to motoring needs. These.,include; Auto laundry, eating establishment, motels, motor hotels, refreshment drive «ins, public garages,' parking areas, repair gar - ages, service stations, drive -in theatres, and amusement parks. (3) SIGN. BILLBOARD. The term "Billboard" means any sign erected, constructed, or maintained for the•purpose ofoutdoor advertising, whether...' 4. 1 I 1 I� I� such sign is independently supported or placed upon the ground, roof or r wall 'of any building, and the advertisement thereon does not -relate to commodities being sold or the business being conducted upon the premises". (4) SIGN, BUSINESS. The term "Business Sign" shall mean any sign which directs attention to a business or profession or to the pri• wary commodity, service or entertainment sold or offered upon the premises` where such sign is located or to which it is attached. s (5) SIGN. FLASHING. The term. "Flashing Sign" shall mean illuminated sign on which the artificial light is not maintained both stationary and constant in intensity and color at all times when such a r't L ; sign is. in use. (6) SIGN. IDENTIFICATION. The term "Identification Sign" shall f: ,mean any sign identifying a resident, school, church or other non-business;,'`a<< st i use• (7) SIGN, ILLUMINATED. The term "Illuminated Sign" shall mean any sign which has characters, letters, figures, design or outline illumi- ,. nated by electric lights or luminous tubes,as a partobf the sign proper. d (8) SIGN, 'TEMPORARY. The term "Temporary Sign" shall mean any sign not over 40 square feet in industrial areas or 15 square feet in all other areas which is not permanently affixed to the ground or a building. Section 56.03 FEES. Permit fees for signs shall be: (1) For signs 40 squarei�feet_or less an.initial fee.of $10.00. The annual fee shall not be charged for eigns,,attached directly on a building, which identifies the activity or advertises .products sold or , services provided in that building*,., f ` 2 For si 8 lar er thaK 401. square. feet the ,tnitial- fee shall,' O 8n 8 be $25.00 plus 25 cents. per. square foot; of the'sign surface exceeding 100 u Square feet. ,� k` •, 3 (9) AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY: (a.) Whidh•,would authorize and direct the City of Fridley_; to remove and dispose of any signs and sign structure on which a permit has been issued but which was not renewed, if the owner does not remove _ the same within a 30 day period following the expiration of the permit. (b) Which would authorize and direct the City of Fridley; to remove the sign and sign structure, at the expense of the applicant where maintenance is required and the maintenance is not furnished, but ' only after a hearing and after a notice of 60-days specifying the main- tenance required by the City. (10) Such other information as the Building Inspector may require..; a: ..;i Section 56.05 LICENSES AND B61DS. No person, firm, or corporation : shall engage in the business of erecting signs, nor shall he be entitled;. .,,q z� �{ to a permit to erect a sign under this ordinance unless licensed to do ',80 .: ? a. by the City Council. Such license may be granted by the City. Council after written application to the City Clerk, accompanied by an annual 'tJ license fee of $25.00 and it may be terminated atyany time for cause. The license shall expire on December. 31 'in the' year of issuance and each , year thereafter. No license shall take effect until the licenseessbhall file with the City Clerk a corporate surety bond in the sum of $11000.00 , t conditioned that the licensees shall make proper application for all sign; . work, pay necessary permit fees, conform to all of the provisions of this Chapter and indemnify and hold the City, its officers and agents, harmless from any damage or claim resulting from or related to the erection or maintenance of any sign in the City by the licensee. .A license and bond shall not be required of an applicant, who is not engaged intthe business C of erecting signs and who chooses to construct'dnd erect his own sign ' on his property. stitute a safety hazard. (3) Except in industrial and commercial districts, signs shall not be painted directly to any exterior building surface but shall be on a r.; separate frame except for temporary display windows. Sign letters, sym- bols may be attached directly to a wall by adhesive or mechanical means. -5- 33 • Section 56.06 PERMITS. It shall be unlawful to keep, install, con- struct, erect, alter, revise, reconstruct, or move any outdoor sign or sign structure within the City of Fridley without first obtaining a permit therefor, except the following: �. (1) A sign not exceeding 15 square feet in area pertaining !; only to the sale, rental, or lease of the premises upon which displayed. (2) An identification sign, not "exceeding 4 square feet in area. (3) A business sign not exceeding 10 square feet in area,•which sign is placed on non - public property. (4) A temporary political sign in regard to a candidate or an e.. election. (5) A temporary sign erected by a religious, eleemosynary, charitable, benevolent, educational, public or civic interest, provided • that each such sign shall bear the name and address of the responsible . owner and shall be removed within 15 days after the date to which the - - r; temporary sign has relevance. Section 56.07 GENERAL REGULATIONS. No sign shall be erected ' r, s or painted in the City of Fridley unless it shall conform to and meet these regulations: (1) No sign shall be installed, which by reason of position, _ shape or color would conflict with the proper functioning or interpretation of any traffic sign or signal. s` (2) There shall be no use of revolving beacons, zip flashers or similar devices that would so distract automobile traffic as to con- stitute a safety hazard. (3) Except in industrial and commercial districts, signs shall not be painted directly to any exterior building surface but shall be on a r.; separate frame except for temporary display windows. Sign letters, sym- bols may be attached directly to a wall by adhesive or mechanical means. -5- (11) TEMPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS,. Temporary political signs shall be removed by the person or persons placing such signs within 15 days after the election for which they are.applicable. .Each such sign shall show the name'and address, printed or indelible ink, of the person re- N. sponsible for the placing ofFthe •sign,.who.shall be deemed prima facia the (4) Temporary signs advertising buildings for rent and for sale ` ' r ; may be in the yard of.such building providing such signs are not placed closer than 10 feet to any property line and do not exceed`40 square-feet'." in industrial areas and 15 square feet in other areas. (5) .Signs not otherwise allowed advertising new housing devel -� fi• - opments of more than 30 building sites and located in Fridley may be con- - structed in any district, providing: Any one sign is not over 600, square t f . feet; the.signs are located at least 300 feet from any pre - existing home ; and 1,000 feet from any sign advertising the same development and the -signs are removed when the particular project is 95% sold out. (6) Except for grand openings and temporary signs less than 6 square feet, there shall be no temporary signs' in any,required setback ,V oY • area. There shall be no more than three such signs on any parcel, and total sign area shall not exceed 18 square feet. {: (jX All temporary signs shall comply immediately with these , performance standards upon the date this Chapter goes into effect. (8) No signs shall overhang the public right -of -way. " (9) Directional signs not Iocated on the premises of use in question may not be located in any district, except by special permit. .. (10) The illumination of any sign located within 500 feet of any residential district lot line shall.be designed so as not to reflectaagy rays of light into adjacent residences. (11) TEMPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS,. Temporary political signs shall be removed by the person or persons placing such signs within 15 days after the election for which they are.applicable. .Each such sign shall show the name'and address, printed or indelible ink, of the person re- N. sponsible for the placing ofFthe •sign,.who.shall be deemed prima facia the • ~ c�b C. Size - Not more than 12 square feet, except as provided for in 56.07 (15). d. Maximum height - Nor more than 6 feet above lot grade. e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any sign in residential district shall be set back a minimum of C 10 feet from any property line. f. Illumination is allowed only where the sin does not inter- fere with other property owners. (2) C -1 and C -IS DISTRICTS. - a. Type - Identification, Business and Automobile Service Signs. E. 4 b. Number - NO RESTRICTION. i c. Size _- The gross surface area of all permitted signs on a k lot or parcel shall not exceed the sum of 4 square feet y per front foot of building. d. Height - Restricted in height so as not to mask or obscure a neighboring business. I e. Maximum projection into front setback area - Any sign may i project only two feet into setback from building. f. Illumination - Illuminated but non - flashing signs permitted. (3)' C -2, C -2S and P DISTRICTS. a. Type Identification, Business, Automobile Service and Illuminated Signs permitted. b. Number NO RESTRICTIONS. C. Size - MAXIMUM OF 400 SQUARE FEET. .d. Height - No part of a pylon or pedestal sign shall be less than'14 feet vertical distance above the street grade level. e. Projection -'No sign shall be closer than 10 feet from the -8- 37 property line. • f. Illumination - Illuminated and flashing signs permitted ex- cept those which are hazardous to vehicular traffic or i create a nuisance to occupants of residences in the area. (4) M -1 and M -2 DISTRICTS. a. Types - All types permitted. b. Number - NO RESTRICTIONS. C, Height - NO RESTRICTIONS. Section 56.09 GRA NDFATHER CLAUSE All Signs located within the Cit of Fridley prior to January 1 1966 may continue to exist as to v yr y , size, illumination and present location until January 1, 1969 provided the t: sign does not violate any provision of the Fridley City Code up to the date fir° this Chapter was passed and adopted. A permit is required for each existing �- sign but the permit application fee for each sign coming within this section{ shall be waived. Section 56.10 HARDSHIP WAIVER. The provisions of this Chapter p, may be waived wherever a strict application would bring undue hardship and the public interest would not be seriously jeopardized after a public c' hearing before the Board of Appeals and an affirmative vote of 4 members of the City Council.t Section 56.11. Any violation of this ordinance shall constitute {; a misdemeanor. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate of- t" fense. f Section 56.12 REPEAL. Subdivision 8 of Section 45.06 and any !' other portions of the Fridley City Code inconsistent with this chapter'.. are hereby repealed. -9- �.; r � _ ��. �G_ I:' ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF LIFE, LIMB, HEALTH, PROPERTY, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND THE OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS OF RESIDENTIAL BUILD- INGS AND PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF AND TO BE KNOWN AS THE "HOUSING CODE" AND DESIGNATED AS CHAPTER 51 OF THE CITY CODE OF FRIDLEY: The @ouncil of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows Section 51.01. In order to provide minimum requirements for the .. protection of life, limb, health, property, safety, and welfare of the general public and the owners and occupants of residential buildings,:tthere is hereby established a Housing Code for the City of Fridley and is desig- nated as Chapter 51 of the Fridley City Code. Section 51.02. Uniform Code by Reference. That subject to such' { exceptions, modifications and changes as noted herein, the 1964 Edition. of the Uniform Housing Code published by the International Conference of '. Building Officials is hereby adopted by reference and established as the Housing Code of the City of Fridley.` Section 51.03. Repeal of Existing Code. Any code or regulation heretofore in effect in the City of Fridley and any provision thereof which is contrary to or inconsistent with the provisions of said Housing Code and the exceptions, modifications and changes as noted herein, is of no further.force and effect immediately upon the effective date of this chapter, and the same is repealed. Section 51.04.' Exceptions. The following exceptions, modifica tions• and changes in the provisions of said Uniform Housing Code are made with respect to said Code and shall be in force in the City of Fridley: (a) The Planning Commission of the City of Fridley, as pro - vided for in chapter 40 of the Fridley City Code shall constitute the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board as provided for in Section H -203 of said Uniform Housing Code. (b) The penalty for the violation of this chapter shall be the 'penalties provided in Chapter 105 of the Fridley City Code and not the penalties set forth in Section H -204 of said Uniform Housing Code. (c), Building Official. The City Manager is hereby designated as the Building Official as provided for in the said Uni- 'form Housing Code. The City Manager is authorized to designate one or more•of the officials or employees of the city as Deputies. — ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 46.01 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE SO AS TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE THE 1964 EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (VOLUME 1) PUBLISHED BY THE INTER- j NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS. The City Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 46.01 of the City Code of Fridley is here- by amended by striking from said Section the reference to the 1961 edition of the Uniform Building Code and in lieu thereof, inserting and including the 1964 edition of the Uniform Building Code (Volume 1)# published'by r the International Conference of Building Officials. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY., this day'!)f December, 1965. William J. Nee, Mayor ATTEST: Marvin C. Brunsell, City Clerk i First Reading: December 60 1965 Second Reading: iz 1 Published: j 1 ICE MACHINE - SPECIFICATIONS To produce 500 # - Daily. Machine to form Ice cubes cylindrical in shape only. Machine to be powered by 1-H.P. Copeland Compressor. Water cooled or Equivalent. Machine Height- 45 518" " Weight - 42 1/4" " Depth - 20 1/2" Water Inlet - 1/2" IPT Overflow Dram - 3/4" " Sump Dram - 3/4a a Condenser - 3/4" " ICE BIN Ice Machine Bin to hold 650# rated capacity. Stainless steel interior. Hamerloid gray exterior. OVERALL HEIaHHT OF ICE MACHINE & BIN NOT TO EXCEED `93+ INCHES. 1 �2 • 0 T oZ BIDS CH ICE MCMW - OPENED HOW. IZCZMRR 20v 1965 - CITY OF FMLBY, MINNESOPA, JJIMR BIU 38Ct1 = m Northern Afar Caaditioning Coo Cheek $1,379.00 414 Sixth Avenue North $56.45 210.00 Minneapolis, Hims3ota 55401 1,1-,;,ba 00 South -Town Refrigeration Co. Certified Check 4555 Grand Avenue Swath $64090 lifstriegpolIs* l moot a 55409 S1.29@000 Cai#:oaic Machimsa 3no. Certified Check 3021 FonXth Avenue South $80.00 Mirnarsa�polia, eota 55400 ��QQ�� Allied Stance Equipment CGrV&V Cashier's Cheek 6100 Wayzata Boulev "d $67,35 Niasneapolis 0 lCitsneeota 55416 KIM eapolis ReatauraUt Supgly Co. $10950.00 217 South 9th Street Bond - Ago Ins* Coo M R.9 i+linz�eapolis, nnesata 55402 5% ,81_„x;0090, 43 BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING MINUTES - DECEMBER 8, 1965 1. The meeting was called to order at 7 :30 P.M. by Chairman Nawrockt. ROLL CALL Members Present: Nawrocki, Fitzpatrick, Goodrich, Jankowski Members Absent: Saunders The Board asked Mr. Howard Dumphy to explain what he wished to do if granted the variance. Mr. Dumphy stated that he would modernize the house that he wished to move onto this lot by adding 200 square feet, winterizing the porch on the front, and replacing the asphalt shingles with new siding. Mr. Gordon Tjosvold, 6545 Arthur Street, said that he would like • to see a new house on that lot. He stated that this house is 40 years old, and that he knew the house since his Aunt had owned it 25 years ago, and that it is a good house. Mr. Robert Dischinger, 6529 Arthur Street, said that he was at the meeting only to find out what the matter was about. The Board asked Mr. Tjosvold and Mr. Dischinger what their wishes. might be in this matter. Mr. Dischinger stated that he does not object to granting the variance, since he feels this proposal would be much better than what is presently on the property. Mr. Tjosvold said that he does not object either because this would be better, but that he still would rather see a new home built. ADJOURNMW: ,ted. Upon a voice vote, there declared the motion carried. There being no further business, Chairman Nawrocki declared the meeting adjourned at 7 :53 P,M. Respectfully submitted, • larl P. Wagner Secretary to the Board • Rte CALL MEMBERS PBESMIT: MEMBERS ABSEW: 0 • BUILDING BOW METXHG DECEMBER 821965 Hauge, Tonco Kravik, Ellis, Wallace, Herder, Kirkham VISITORS- MSM..- Mr. Howard Dumphy, Allen G. Jensen, Building Inspector, Mr. R. G. lots of the Erickson Petroleum Corporation 1. There was a short discussion about moving this house in but neither Mr. Tonco nor Mr. Hauge had seen'the sites, so the meeting adjourned temporarily to give them an opportunity to go_out and look at the,-. house and the proposed building site. The meeting reconvened at 8:30 and the results of the discussion were both Mr. Tonco and Mr. Vaugs rec®mmended approval of the move, provided the rear kitchen roof be made a gabled roof of the same pinch as the house roof, and a hand rail be installed around the front porch roof; also, that new siding be applied to the house and that the trim and windows be painted. Mr. Kirkham called because he could not attend the meeting and sti- puiated approval of the move provided that the house were resided and painted and the basement kept as low on the lot as 'possible. Mr. Kravik called and designated approval of the move provided the house were resided and repainted on the outside. 2. VISITORS: Mr. R. G. Rote of the Erickson Petroleum Corporation was in attendance with plans, but because of no Quorum, this matter was set over until December 15th. ADJOURRY: Tbere being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9 :00 P.M. Respectfully edmitted, Allen 0. Jensen, Building Inspector Aoting Secretary to the Board a • 0 1. BUILDING BOARD MEETING - DECEMBER 15, 1965 ROLL Members Presents Kravik, Kirkham, Tonco (Ward 2), Haug* (Ward 1) Herder (Ward 3), Ellis Members Absent$ Wallace Visitors Presents Gordon Tjosvold, Bob Ro -e (Holiday Village N.)rth) The age of the house; the existing structure on the lot (the possibility it would be brought up to Code and the desirability of the moved house compared to this); the size of the.lot (40 foot frontage) in relation to the house requested to be moved; the effect on the neighborhood of moving an old house into it; the type of houses existing in the neighborhood were discussed. Mr. Tjosvold (a neighbor) questioned the desirability of moving the house. • A notkgq x1ae made _t cos p e �th itgm until the building inspector (Mr. Jensen) can notify Mr. Dumphy to appear before the board. Seconded and carried. 2. After a discussion about the site of the building in relation to fire protection; the building material used on the outside; the indefinite plans in relation to the appearance of the building, the item was tabled until a later meeting when definite plans will be submitted by Mir. Rote. ADJOtTRNiNTs The Meeting was adjourned at 8216 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Olive Herder Secretary to the Board 45 0 FRIDLEY SAP= CO WTTEE =TING - DBCEIBER 15, 1965 The Meeting was called to order by Chairman Larson at WO P.M. Members Presents McCarthy, Larson, Linton, Bandel, Saedga, Rev. Stone Others Presents Mayor Nee, Councilmen Thompson, Kirkham, Commissioner O'Bannon, David Harris, Field Representative of Minnesota Cogant, Mike Hafner, Ronald ,Johnson, City Manager Wagner 1. The two year award plaque was presented by Mr. Conant'to Mayor Nee and Chief McCarthy. 2. PLAT SHOWING A REVZ PORTION OF COMBRCE PARK. FRCH 73RD TO 3s Chief McCarthy moved that the Committee accept the lat, as is, V e re tioa_ at stop signs be Pce�on_ea end of Chief McCarthy moved that Xhe -iAteq table action until a decision is made as to the service road being on the County right - of -way, turning radius of 150 feet at 77th Way, and the north end of Lot 1, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2 Pearson's 1st Addition. The entire service road will be on Pearson's property. Seconded by Linton. The motion carried. ADJOUBt M s There being no further business, Linton moved that the Committee be adjourned, seconded by McCarthy, the motion carried. The next meeting will be January 19, 1966- Respectfully submitted, Deloria Bendel Secretary to the Committee ram L'71 • FRIDLEY HOUSING AND R=E9' WF'MZNT AUTHORITY MEWING - DECEMBER 1, 1965 The meeting was called to order at 8:30 P.M. at City Hall. ROLL CALL Present: Chairman Richard Herder, Commissioners John Meyer, Paul Barrow and Lois Mullin, Executive Director Allan Anderson, Legal Counsel Wyman Smith, and Planning Consultant Dave Alberta representing Hodne Associates. Visitors: Mayor and Mrs. William Nee, Mayor -elect Jack Kirkham. Councilmen John Wright, Glenn Thompson, Councilman -viect Dave Harie, SEA representative Barker, And Robert Johnson, County Attorney, Riverview residents Mr. Storla, Mr. Allan Rundell and relatives, Mrs. Wafer, Mr. Hollenbeck, and tars. Strob. Absent: Commissioner Robert Kendall SPECIAL MWPING WITH RIVERVIEW RESZDMM The meeting began with a brief introduction to the problem by Chairman Herder. He stated that our original intention was to carry out the Survey and planning Application studies, however we have now received a letter from the Urban Renewal Administration in Chicago giving us fourtoon days to prove local financial oupport,or the availability of Federal funds will be terminated. Chairman Herder then Basked Mr. Storla, a Riverview resident, for a brief sum - marry of the situation in Riverview. Mr. Storla stated that the area is rapidly becoming deteriorated, i.e. several residents have abandoned their property %six since November 1, 1965. and several during late spring 1965). The general feeling among remaining residents is, "Why should we put more money into our homes with no chance of regaining it ?" Mr. .Allan Rundell, another Riverview resident, stated that he has had his home up for sale but with all the publicity from the flood and the Urban Renewal project, nobody is interested. Be asked if there was any cbanae that Fridley could raise the money *within the fourteen days and suggested that using the land for an industriai park would be worth the City's expenditure. The futility of the idea of an industrial park in that area was pointed out to him. Mrs. Wafer, another resident, atated that if the area floods again this spring, She mould not repair her home but would abandon it. She then asked if they could sue the City for allowing building permits in the area. Wyman Smith, City Attorney, stated that he did not believe the City could be held responsible in any way. S.be then pointed out the dangers that Riverview Terrace Road pr*- rented; the road is so narrow that two care cannot pass in some areas. School Page 2 • buses use the road everyday and there is no retaining rail. In the winter the road becomes very slippery and a bus full of children could very likely end up in the river. Mr. Smith stated that the City could be held responsible for improper maintenance of the road but not for failure to construct a herd surface road. Mr. Rundell pointed out that they had had no trouble until the City put in the sewer and water systems along the river and wrecked the natural river frontage. He wanted to know wily the City couldn't be held responsible and what they we" going to do about it. Councilman Wright answered this question by stating that the new housing code mould help by allowing the City to restrict building in the area, by demolishing empty structures that presented hazards. and by forcing people to clean up their areas. It was pointed out that this wouldn't help the residents whose homes would be flooded again this year. The possibility of the County helping to finance the project and using it for a County park was discussed. Dave Alberta of Hodne Associates stated that the County could be considered an a potential developer but could not be part of the 25 financial obligation of the City unless they gave money to the City with no strings attached. Mr. Robert Hoilsnbeck, another Riverview resident, stated that he had found a lot in Fridley and is considering moving his home. He asked if the City would buy his present lot from him. The total amount of the move will run • approximately SL UO u. This will be money lost to him as his home will be worth no more when it is moved then the original purchase price. He stated that he could not afford this lose, especially when he eaunot get a sufficient bank loan. Mr. Barker of the Small Business Administration was then called on. He stated that houses that have been damaged in floods are eligible for 30 year loans at 3n for repairing purposes. He asked Mr. Hollenbeck what the physical lose to hia property from the flood had been. Mr. Hollenbeck answered S2,u�,0. Mr. $alter stated that they could manage to include a little money in the trans- action for moving expenses but not $7,0 -u on a $2,uu�, damrgo loss. Mac. bmith and Mr. Wright pointed out that the lots should also be considered physical lase because before the flood they were worth money and now they are worth nothing. Mr. Barker stated that he could give no definite statement at this time, but encouraged residents to apply for loans and the applications would be given every consideration possible. The general feeling among the residents was that they could not afford a second mortgage on their homes anyway as they would probably and up owing more then the hoagies v*re worth. Mayor Pee stated that the City did not have any uncommitted funds to give residents for moving purposes. The residents then asked Mr. Kirkham what he intended to do to help them. Mr. Kirkham stated that he had made a suggestion but they hadn't liked his idea. Mr. Hollenbeek said he felt Mr. Kirkham had a moral obligation to the r 49 Page 3 residents as he was instrumental in getting Urban Renewal, the only feasible plan available, detoated. Mr. Kirkham stated that his original idea had been to trade the residents tsar - delinquent lots for their current lots and that he would try to help with the moving expenses. The question was raised whether this would not require another bond election. Mr. Kirkham replied that he did not know. He was szke*d if the residents gent before the City Council asking for moving help mould he back their request and for how much help. Be replied that he would probably back them but would give no definite statement as to the amount of money, just tint he used they word 'help'. Robert Johnson, County AttQmey, stated that the County would be willing to help in anyway possible. Chairman Herder pointed out that this would not solve the problem as there were many homes that could not be moved and something had to be done about them as the mainterance cost to the City, eveery spring is vary large. He then asked Mr. Kirkham if he would be in favor of another bond slection in the near future for Rive -view it the cost could be shared by the Riverview resi- dents. Mr. Hirkh= would not make a commitment at this time but said he would be willing to meet with the Hou.ning Authority to discuss the possibility of another band ar:esction. The meting was set for 8:30 P.M. on December 3, 1965, in the Housing /authority Office. It was requested that Mr. Alberta have a detailed list of costs and . Mr. Anderson have a list of available tax•- dolinquent lots. a M)WING APMOVAL OF MIMES - MOOING OF FOV'DIDffi�2 1965 Dire. Mullin made a motion that the minutes of the meeting of November 23, 1963 be approved as received. Mr. Barrow seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion asasssed unanimously. BILLS AND COMUNICATIONS Letter from URA - The letter from the Urban Renewal Administration referred to during the special meeting ww officially received. kD=UTM DIRECTOR'S REPORT Social Security Taxes - Mr. Anderson stated that in a telephone call to the Minneapolis BA, he had laarned that the FICA taxes were to be paid to the State and the State would forward tm. He said this would be done. .........susses, sun" iron UKA - Mr. Anderson stated that the additional funds froes the Urban Renewal Administration would be refused and that an up-to -date billing from Hodne: Associates would be requested to close out the books. • Hodno Associates was told to cease work as of December 1, 1965. • E PW 4 DRA Audit - Mr. Anderson sald that he had informed the Urban Renewal ddministra• tion that our books would be reedy for a final audit after December 15, 1965. Resignation - Mr. Anderson submitted his resignation as the Rxecutive Director of the Housing Authority. No action will be taken until Decmber 8, 1965. OLD BUSZNWS Mr. Meyer reported that Roger Johnson should be finished with the additional documentation on City Center by December b► 1965• Nhi,( BUSIMS A special meeting of the Commission in called for Friday, December 3, 1965, at 8:3u P.M. to discuss another Riverview bond election with Mr. Kirkham. AWgMMR As there was no further business, Mr. Barrow made a motion that the meeting be adjourned at 10:30 P.M. Mr. Meyer secoxided. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, said motion pawed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Lois Mullin, Secretary Fridley housing & Redevelopment Authority 50 514 STATE OF MINNESOTA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION Notice of Public Hearing on Establishment of • �4 Future Water Use Classifications and Standards of Water Quality and Purity for All Waters of the State Pursuant to authorization by the Water Pollution Control Commission and in accordance with applicable statutes, and as required by Laws 1963, Chapter 874, Section 115.44, notice is hereby given that public hearings will be held by the Water Pollution Control Commission or by one or more authorized members, employees, or agents thereof beginning at 10:00 a.m. on January 5, 1966 in the North Hall of the Civic Auditorium in Rochester, Minnesota, and continuing at 10:00 a.m. on January 19 in the Marshall Theater in Marshall, at 10:00 a.m. on February 2 in the National I Guard Armory in Moorhead, at 10:00 a.m. on February 16 in the Little Theater of the Memorial Building in Hibbing and at 10:00 a.m. on March 2, 1966 in the Auditorium of the State Office Building in St. Paul, for the purpose of receiving and consi- dering testimony and evidence bearing on tte establishment of water use classifi- • cations and standards of water quality and purity for all waters of the state and acting upon the adoption of regulations relating thereto. Proposed classifications and standards are on file in the office of the Commission at the State Board of Health Building on the University of Minnesota Campus in Minneapolis. The proposals on file are open to inspection by any inter- ested person in said office, and copies will be mailed upon request. The hearing will not be restricted to the proposals per se, nor shall any action of the Com- mission in this instance be limited thereto, but will be open to consideration of all matters relating to the general subject of establishment of classifications and standards for the waters of the state. Testimony or other evidence to be submitted for consideration should be perti- nent to the matter at hand, and.may be presented either at the public hearing or by mailing the same to the office of the Commission at the address given above before March 2, 1966. -ry ' R. N. Barr, M.D., Secretary Water Pollution Control Commission Dated: November 2, 1965 i J' Rectory: 6120 Fifth Street N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Phone: 560 -5600 CbuKCb of Saint William FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 Pastor: REV. GERALD E. KEEFE December 79 1965. City Council City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Gentlemen: After discussion at the last two meetings of the Fridley Ministerial Association on November 4 and December 2 the members decided to submit this resolution for your considera- tion: It was moved and seconded and unanimously carried by the Fridley Ministerial Association that it communi- cate by an open letter with the City Council and the FRIDLEY RECORD that we as a Ministerial Association have discussed the pre and post election campaign state- ments with great concern and urge that future campaigns be conducted on the highest level. Respectfully yours,' 1 Rev. Gerald E. Keefe Secretary- Treasurer Fridley Ministerial.Association GEK:sm c. THE FRIDLEY RECORD 52 C , J �i��,t�.•�.tn 13� �16t 1 73 21 q 1 f�A _ —�— r— ( +' � tj r.yK � F S 11 1 ( �r, .iir�j t• . sty • s/ � i .G ,� ;, 1 r i r ( r d , f Ir , i I i 1 � - �4�Mtv.n ,. .., �.: OY ..N. IKJ. ,. ,.. to .,v. ita -,f( �r �•••7. yip ?+ r- AiiriS!', fill, r�r�•. �+. ai^k`V- f�+I:.�R.�.'! �,,..1ylrir riTlRN`H�AA r��t �t�ar'll ..{MI �l,d. Ll December 16, 1965 Honorable Mayor and City Council Fridley, Minnesota G tl 5� en emen. This letter will attempt to clarify a little of the trouble that we are having regarding the fire protection system in Unity Hospital. The fire alarm, fire extinguisher and fire protection systems were designed by our engineers, Vern Stalmack and Associates, as ordered and recommended by the State Fire Marshal and the Fire Underwriters. The recommendation that the small hoses hanging in a cabinet be omitted came from the above agencies and this recommendation was complied with, as were all others received prior to the opening of bids for the project. The State Fire Marshal and all other appropriate agencies were furnished with plans and specifications on October 6 and 7, 1964. You will notice that the Fire Marshal letter of approval and recommendation was received on October 19, 1965, in plenty of time for action before bid opening, and competitive prices could be obtained. It seems that the Fridley Fire Department have someone from the State Fire Marshal's office who thinks differently than the persons we have been working with. We are attempting to straighten this matter out by ¢ having a meeting with the State Fire Marshal's office and the Fridley Fire Department on Munday or Tuesday of next week. The North Suburban Hospital District Board wants to have the best possible protection that it can give its patients. However, we do not know which way to turn when the experts cannot agree upon the best possible pro- tection. Will .keep you informed as to the outcome of this Sincerely, NORTkI , B AN , HPSPITAL DISTRICT �? J 'Charles E. Johanson CEJ /s v 55 a y -- ATB Nly g�� _ ,;$#x#e of joi=esatn FIRE MARSHAL DEPARTMENT October 15, 1964 AaW Paul, A=89ofx 55101 S. C. Smiley & Associates 1750 Hennepin Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota Re: Plans for North Suburban Hospital Fridley, Minnesota Gentlemen Deputy Bryan Daugherty has approved the plans for the above. However, we request the following: 1. 5# CO2 fire extinguisher and fire blanket in kitchen • 2, At' least two units of first aid fire protection for the garage and a 15# CO2 or 10# dry chemical extinguisher 3. A 10# dry chemical or 15# CO2 extinguisher for `boiler room We are retaining the plans for our file. Yours very truly Q/�'tc:c Charles R. Berk- Assistant' State Fire i "'arshal CRB: xZL �• �• �iYi�( ARCFfpYE CTS OCT-19 196 0 C L A I M 8 Ll General and Public Utilities 7319 t. WwwO 74,11 9079 tbxw gb 0132 56 57 ESTIMTES TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCXL DECEMR 200 1965 • D. Wo Harstad Company0 Incorporated 7101 Highway #65 H.S. Fridleey0 Minnesota 55432 Estimate #2 (FINAL) Tornado Damage to Fridley Fire Hall $ 1,803064 Estimate #2 (F=hL) On Construction for Civic Center $ 208.24 Comstock & Davise Inc.0 1446 County Road "J" Minneopolis0 esota Consulting Engineers 55433 For furnishing of resident inspection and resident supervision for the stakiay out of the construction work for s i Estimate #1 - Storm Sewer zMrove0AUt Project No, 120 Schedule A, from November 10 1965 thru November 270 19650 (TeH. #47 System) $ 345000 Estimate #8 - Water Improvement Project Noe 34-0 om Member 1 1965 thru November 27,, i S0 $ 12,50 oss ToH. x#694 = Johnson St., 7th St, Estimate #12 - sewer & Water lWavement Project No. 70 from November 10 1965 thru November 270 19650(Riverview Terroo So, of Miss, Mace etc), $ 304050 Estimate ate #4 - Storm Sewer T.snprovemetnt Project No, 73 from November 10 1965 thru November 279 1965(54th Avenue Northeast), $ 292050 Estimate #4 - Sanitary sager,, Water & Storm Safer improvement Project No, 73-A from movember 10 1965 thru November 27,, 1965 (54th & Innsbruck 5th Addition), $ 1x6.00 Estimate 09 - Water IWoveaaat Project No. 75-,A from NavMbW 10 1965 thru November 270 1965 (Three . Additional Drift Wells),, $ 252,50 Estimate 07 - Water IMProvemmt Project No, 75-9 from NovudM r 10 1965 thru November 270 1965 (Booster Station - 63rd Avenue N.So & T,Ho #100)0 $ 20000 ESTIIMES TO BE APPROV)SD By Ti3E CITY COUNCIL — LZCXXBSR 200 1965 •Continued000 CMstock & Davis 0 Inca Consulting Engineers 1446 County Road "J" Hinaeapoalise Minnesota 55432 Pow the furnishing of resident inspection and resident supervision far the staking out of the ccuistruction work four % Bstimate #8 - storm sewer 3xVw%ffV at Project No. 68 from November 10 1965 thru November 27„ 19650 $ 3 8000 (1964 storm sewer program) (sea Page 75 of council Agenda for September 210 1964 for detail) 0 I0 58 0 • CrZZ Ira c MPARnAW City of Fridley, Munesot4 lbsevable Mayor and City Coaaail e% 8arl P. 'Wagner, City N City of Fridley 6491 University Avomnto Northeast Fridlay, lsinneseta 53421 Re: FML Ss tivate Tornado Damage Fridley Fire Ball Gentleow: Decembers 209 1963 Estimate 929 the FINAL. SSTZA Ma for D. W. Rusted Compena►, Incorporated, 7101 Highway 965 N.B., Fridley, Ninwsota 554323, for work completed acc vding, to proposal submitted on Jun 11, 1965. General Conditions (supervisio4 ins., permits, etc.) 780.79 Lumber end U1,11Mork 896.62 Carpenter Labor 1, 078.00 Concrete and Hasoanvy 3, 001.'51 Brick and Clem Brick 330.00 Glass and •Glaaiug 66.00 Painting and Decorating 1,295.00 Plumbing and Heating 653.00 Electrical (include light fixtures) 67940 Ovefhead Doors (include glass & glaring) 801.81 Windows OWwveer) none Porcelain 16700.w Roofing and Sheetmmetal 30475.00 Structural Steel and 8rrection 693.00 Hollow Metal no= 170:00 Metal Supports for Canopy 12000 Shaetrock Tep#ID9 160.00 Machin Rental • Lift 600.00 Scaffolding 75.00 Overhead Door at Rear of BuildiNg vo 91,00 Plus 10% P & OB #159396.73 Total Amount Ruud , 0 Lass Estimate $1 11J.M_76,, Not Amount Due FINAL P,AY MM 1 8 59 • CA • Fuel Estimate • Fridley Me Hall D. W. Harstad Co. Page 2 0 0 The above work has been viewed by me and Bob 8ughesg the Fire Chief and find that it is substantially complete. Wyman Smith$ the City Attorney,, has drawn up the one year maintenance agreement which has been executed by the Contractor. If it is satisfactory to the Council, then I reaonawnd that the final payment be made upon acceptance of the work of your Honorable Body, and the one year maintenance period commence on the date listed above. NQsob CC: D. W. Herstad & Co. Respectfully submitted, NASIIi Qom, P.B. City Bn:gineer • CITY MVINM=NG DEPAB7N= City of Fridley, Minnesota Hce�oarable Mayor and City Council C/o Earl Pe Wagner. City manager City of Fridley 6431 Onivarsity Avev= Northeast Fridley, Mimumota 55432 8e: FINAL BSTIMATB On Construction for Civic Center Gentlemen: December 20, 1965 Estimate Roo 20 the FINAL ESTIMATE for D,W, Harstad Company, Incer. porated, 7101 Highway 65 N.K.. Fridley. Minnesota 55432 for work • completed as follows: B=iek Work as per revised plans by S,Co Smiley & Associates on Bast wall of Fire Hall =1,734:35 3 Skydomes installed as per S.C, SmLley & Associates revised plans in Fire Ball Total amount earned $ 2,082,35 Less Estimate P 1 10874°11 Net amount due -FINAL PAYMNT -- e2 The above work has been viewed by me and Bob Hughes, the Fire Chiaf and find that it is substantially complete. Wyman Smith, the City Attorney has drawn up the one year amintAaanae agreement which has been excuted by the contractor.! If it is satisfactory for the council, then I reeomend that the final. payment be made upon acceptance of the work of your arable Body, and the one year Maintenance period commence on the date listed Abe" 0 CCKTRACTCIRS LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL DECEMBER, 20, 1965 ELECMICAL Carl. G. Lindell 115 - S. 58th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota by: Carl G. Lindell NEW GS1f6Bl6l. COUTitACTOR T. A. Nailer - Remodeling Theo. A. Miller 1225 Monroe St. X. E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 R b R Builders 8470 Eastwood Drive Minneapolis, Minnesota by; Theo. A. Miller NEW by; Robyn Lawmelk NEW PLMSIXG • Northeast Plumbing Company 4601 Decatur Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota by: William L. Gadtke RENEWAL m m o - v d - - - - - - - - = .. m � - d - - o - o - - - - - OTBER LICENSES DELIVERY D CSC LICENSE Land O' Lakes Creameries, Inc. 2215 Remedy St. w. Eo Minneapolis, Minnesota • by; Mr. B. Welureich 1 Truck $10.00 Fee Paid 62 • L18T OF NXT1PLE DWB X IWS TO BE LICENSED AND APPROVED BY THE CiI!'T COUNC LL DECERM 20, 1.965 1965 -66 Period NAIL 0 ADDRESSER ADDRESS OF APT. 811 APrT UNITS „� PAID Mr. Carl A. Swenson Brooklyn Land Cowpany Route No. 1, Bose 59 201 Satellite Lane N. E. paseo, Minnesota 55369 ]Fridley, Minnesota 55421 It $11.00 I• C. N. Ericson 2325 Winnatka Avenue No. 6008 - 2nd. Street N. E. Minneapolis, Mien. 55427 Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Albin Johnson 6824 Ewing Avenue forth 5810 - 2k Street N. E. Minneapolis, Minn. 55429 Fridley, Minn. 55421 Bernard R. Julkowski 1420 Nolan Terrace 7400 Lyric Lane N. B. Minneapolis, Minn. 55421 Fridley, Minn. $5432 Bernard R. Julkmski. 1420 Nolan Terrace Minneapolis, Minn. 55421 Bernard R. Julkowski 1420 Nolan Terrace Minneapolis, Mims. :5421 1120 - 52nd Avenue N. E. Fridley, Minn. 55421 1170 - 52nd Avenue N. I. Fridley, Minn. 55421 Bernard R. Julkawski 1420 Nolan Terrace 389 - 74th Avenue N. E. Minneapolis, Minn. 55421 Fridley, Minn. $5432 Bernard R. Julkovski 1420 Nolan Terrace 415 - 74th Avenue N. Bo Minneapolis, Mims. 55421 Fridley, Minn. SS432 Williao X. Lee 4233 Arthur Street N.E. Minneapolis, Minn. 0421 Northwest pnit Invet. Co. 7437 Lyndale Ave. South Minneapolis, Minn. 55423 Tred Caapany 1427 Lowry Ave. No. Minneapolis, Minn. 55421 Walburg & Kirby 1323 -.4th Street N. E. Minneapolis, Minn. 55413 5035 - 3rd Street N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 990 Lynda Drive N. Z. 950 Lynde Drive Y. E. 910 Lynda Drive -N. B. 251 - 57th Place N. E. Fridley, Nunn. 55421 3770 - 24 Street N. E. Fridley, Nimosota Eli .4 8 16 16 11 11 F7 11 it it 7 11 10.00 10.00 10.00 16.00 16.00 11.00 11.00 10.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 10.00 11.00 Lem ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 88 OF THE CITY CODE TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF MOTOR- DRIVEN VEHICLES OR SKIS ON ANY WATER OR WATERWAY WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, m r r The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: t, Section 1. Chapter 88 of the Fridley City Code is hereby." amended to provide for a Section 88.11 as follows: Section 88.11 WINTER -TIME VEHICLES This chapter shall be construed to include motor - driven ski or sled vehicles on any frozen water or waterway within the city of Fridley and each of the sections shall be con- strued to include motor - driven ski or sled vehicles. s Passed by the City Council of the City of Fridley this day of December, 1965. R William J. Nee, Mayor ATTEST: K Marvin C. Brunsell, Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: b h • , Pu lis : i be: M Ew. • fe t APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT Permit No. Location Sb 'Ao Fridley, Minn., FRIDLEY INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby makes application for a permit for the work herein speci- fied, agreeing to do all work in strict accordance with the City Ordinances and rul- ings of the Department of Buildings, and hereby declares that all the facts and re- presentations stated in this application are true and correct. Mr. MM A. T. NNN Gearman Pine Tree Lake Road White Bear 10 Nian Qv Owner Kind of Building br Used as apartments Work to be completed about 19._____ Estimated Cost $ �,�_ - - i� DESCRIPTION How Installed: Flatwise on Extended out frown Wall Roof 11 Dimensions: Length , Height /'1- , Thickness O Distance from Sidewalk Roof v-a Constructed of: Ir Wood, Iron and Wood Illuminated Wiring Application No. Ss ICAAICY b: .4,f - r-,f e a o /V& --,0v S' /may 65, NOTICE FOR BIDS The City Council of the City of Fridley will open bids at 12:00 Noon on January 4, 19660 at the City Hall. 6431 University Avenue, Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota, 55421, for the towing and storage of police impounded automobiles and automobiles that are in violation of any provision of the Fridley City Code or the Minnesota State Statutes. Infor- mation as to the terms and conditions and other data pertaining to the bid may be obtained from the office of the City Manager • at 6431 University Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota, 55421. The bid should be in writing, sealed, and on the form prepared by the City. The bid should be delivered or handed to the office of the City Manager on or before 12:00 Noon on the 4th day of January, 1966. L� arl P. Wagner U Fridley City Manager 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55421 ro L J PROPOSAL FORM FOR TONING CONTRACT City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Gentlemen: I hereby submit my bid for the towing, removal, and storage of vehicles at the order of the Police Departmant of the City of Fridley, Day Calls each Night Calls each • Indoor Storage per day Outside Storage per day Storage Capacity Indoor Outdoor I have read the proposed contract and agree to the terms and conditions contained therein% OR llama) (NdVess Signature Officer an3 Miclal apao y 0 67 • PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR THE TOWING AND STORAGE OF POLICE IMPOUNDED AUTOMOBILES ANTD THE CITY OF FRIDLEY This agreement entered into this day of January, 19669 by and between of hereinafter referred to as the contractor and the City of Fridley, a municipal corporation with offices at 6431 University Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota 554210 hereinafter referred to as the City. 111TREAS, the contractor has proposed to do towing and storage of police impounded automobiles and automobiles deter• mined to or found to be in violation of the Fridley City Code and the State Statutes; `!ND WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City that the contractor show responsibility to the City and the public and indicate the charges and rates for towing and storage of votor vehicles. AIMI WHEREAS, it in the intention of the City and the contractor that this agreement shall run for the period of a year from January 5, 19660 to December 31, 1966, NOW THERhFORE, it is lautually agreed: I. That the contractor will do towing, removal, and storage of vehicles promptly upon the order of the police department of the Cityo 2. That the contractor will file a certificate of insurance of public liability coverages protecting the City of Fridley frmm any loss or liability by reason of the act or acts of the contrao. • tor. The certificate of insurance is to be filed with the City Clerk of the City of Fridley and the insurance is to remain in force during the term of this contract and for any renewal 69 thereof. i3. The contractor shall maintain indoor storage for at least four (4) vehicles. The contractor shall maintain outside storage for at least ten (10) vehicles. The outside storage yard shall be screened in accordance with the policy established by the City Council of the City of Fridley. 4. The rate per day for inside storage shall be $ The rate per day for outside storage shall be $a Towing rates shall be uniformly charged to all owners of vehicles. The rate of towing for day calls being the period from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. shall be $ . The rate for night calls during the period from 9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. shall be $ 5• The contractor will assume its own responsibility for the collection of all fees involved with the towing removal or storage of any vehicle. 6. The City is not to be liable or responsible for any towing or storage fees or for any unpaid fees for storage or towing. 7. The company shall maintain at least one (1) vehicle available to the police department of the City of Fridley for emergency call for a full 24 hour service for the purpose of towing, removal, or storage of vehicle. AGREED to this day of January, 19660 Seal Contractor Witnesses: by its City of Fridley . by its ayor Seal by its Hager 0 COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. Consulting Engineers 1446 County Road "J" Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 December 14, 1965 CHANCE ORDER NUMBER THREE WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 75 -A FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Keys Well Drilling Co. 413 North Lexington Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized and instructed to proceed with the completion of this Contract in accordance with the revised well locations, connecting piping, and other modifications contained herein. The purpose of this change order is to reorganize the Contract to incorporate the work included under Change Or4pX$, _ Number One and Number Two, which was for the purpose of exploration, testing and observation, and also the abandonment and salvage of the original Wells #7 and #8; and to order the Contract changes necessary due to the change in well location and related construction requirements. The final well locations, pump house locations, connecting piping, etc., are shoran on the attached drawings. The construction shall be completed in accor- dance with these revised plans. Pump motor horsepower shall be changed to the following: #7 -- 75 HP, #8 -- 60 HP, #9 -- 75 HP. The electrical service to the well houses shall be as follows: #7 shall be served underground from existing Well House #4 with accompanying control cable between #7 and an unpowered telephone circuit in A. No. 8 shall be the main service point for Filter Plant #2, Well #8 and Well #9. Service to the Well #8 .Filter Plant and Well #9 shall be underground as shown on the drawings. Control of #8 and #9 shall be underground between these points and the Filter Plant. Underground 460' -30 service to the Filter Plant shall be increased as shown on the plans. Installation of transformers in the Filter Plant for 11OV/220V load shall be as originally planned. Pump house construction shall involve the same items and materials and shall conform to the revised layout shown. All items of equipment shall be included and installed as in the original plans with the exception of items modified herein. The Contract lump suss price shall be adjusted as follows: Original Lump Sum Price $160,960.00 Change Order #1 Add 11,961.75 Change Order #2 Add 17,503.14 CONTRACT AUTHORIZED TO DATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $190,424.89 70 71 • Kegs Well Drilling Co. Water Impr. 75 -A, Fridley Change Order No. 3 -2- December 14, 1965 CHANGES UNDER CHANCE ORDER NUMBER THREE: Additions to Contract Additional underground electrical construction b power panel modifications $ 13,052.50 220 L.F. 12" @ $ 7.00 /L.P _ $ 1,540.00 155 L.F. 16" C.I.P @ $ 13.80 L.P. _ $ 1,540.00 1 Ea. 14" x 14" x 12" Tee @ $ 309.47_ /Ea. _ $ 309.47 1 Ea. 14" x 16" Reducer @ $ 180.18 /Ea. _ $ 180.18 1 Ea. 16" x 16" x 10" Tee @ $ 327.18 /Ea. _ $ 327.18 1 Ea. 16" x 16" x 16" Tee @ $ 417.31 /Ea. _ $ 417.31 1 Ea. 16" x 18" Recucer @ $ 223.81 /Ea. _ $ 223.81 1 Ea. 20" x 20" x 16" Tee @ $ 536.82 /Ea. _ $ 536.82 1 Ea. 20" Sleeve @ $ 197.36 /Ea. _ $ 197.36 1 Ea. Wet Connection @ $ 1,455.00 /Ea. $ 1,455.00 2 Ea. 16" Cate Valve b M.R. @ $ 4,184.50 /Ea. _ $ 8,369.00 1'.Ea. 18" x 12" Tapping Tee b Valve @ $ 2,070.14 /Ea. _ $ 2,070.14 Total Additions $ 30,218.77 Deductions from Contract Reduction in Pump Motor Cost $ 377.00 625 L.F. 14 C.I.P @ $ 10.50 /L.F = $ 6,562.50 310 L.F. 18" C.I.P @ $ 14.00 F. _ $ 4,340.00 2 Ea. 18" 450 Bends @ $ 132.00 /Ea. _ $ 264.00 4 Ea. 14" 450 Bends @ $ 98.00 /Ea. $ 392.00 1 Ea. 14" 900 Bend @ $ 125.00 jEa. _ $ 125.00 1 Ea. 12" x 12" x 10" Tee @ $ 100.00 /Ea. _ $ 100.00 1 Ea. 12" 11k0 Bend @ $ 63.00 /Ea. _ $ 63.00 ,. 0 Keys Well Drilling Co. Water Impr. 75 -A, Fridley Change Order No. 3 Deductions from Contract (Cont.) 1 Ea. 18" 950 Bend 1 Ea. Valve Pit & Piping -3- @ $_ 160.00 /Ea. @ $ 15.600.00 /Ea. Total Deductions December 14, 1965 . $ 160.00 s $ 15.600040 $ 27.983.50 Net Contract Ad jusmeendt, $ 2,235.27 Ad ADJUSTED CONTRACT PRICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 192.660.16 Final adjustments in contract price shall be made on the basis of the unit prices set forth in the Proposal and established herein. Submitted and approved this 14th day of December, 1965 by Comstock & Davis, Tze. COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. E. V. Comstock, P. E. Approved this day of December, 1965 by Keys`Well Drilling Co. KEYS WELL DRILLING CO. By Title Approved and accepted this day of , 1965 by the City of Fridley. CITY OF FRIDLEY By Mayor By City Manager 72 RESOLUTION 140,_1 / 2- : WATER PROJECT #'75C- SCH8DULS 2 A R299CUMO''7 40 EITM TO TIAM VITU 'Y iSV'fW AY t ADDITION OF HIGH SERVICE PUMPS AND THREE ADDITIONAL FILTERS AT FRIDLEY COK4MS PARK WHEREAS. there are continuing requirements &r the development of they water utilities system, within the City of Fridley, and WHEREASn reporta from time to time have previously been made by the ec"altiug engineers for the city, and WHBBSA8. there is a treed to furnish art adequate water supply "to those now hooked Onto the system and to have water available for now users that will necessarily need to hook onto the system, and WMUM0, pursuant to a request of the City Council, a report has been prepared by Comstock and Davis. Inc,, with reference to the"impcovownt sad that such report is by way of a three page letter dated December 17. 1964. and WHEREAS. this report was received by the Council, on or abaft December 17, 1964. and WHEREAS-0 the matter was fully discussed between the cayoulting engineers and the City Council at a regular meeting held on December 21. 1964. • NOW THEREFORE. be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota: I• 1, That the piping and high serwice pumps portion of item IV•,A and three additional filters in item IV-B in the reports of the consulting engineers, is here by designated a,, project NW75 -C Schedule-2, the construction of this is approved. The consulting engineers namely, Comstock and Davis, Inc,, are designated as the ,engineers for this improvement and they are instructed and directed to prepare plans and specifications for the work and construction provided for under Project #W75 -C Schedule 20 2, The City Manager shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under the plans and specifications, The Advertisement shall be published for three weeks,, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be publicly opened and considered by the City of Fridley at 12:00 noon on 0 1966 by the administrative staff, The bids and the staff report is referred to the City Council for action at a regular Council meeting. at 8 :00 p,mo on the 0 '1966. ADOP79D BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF , ,5 ATTS3T: Mayor ' William J: flea er n C. Brunse "73 i ,. . . • • '! . "OLUTION NO, _� 1963 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE c 1.1,ITTING OF SPECIAL ASSEM -fMTS ON. PARCEL 4170 LOTS 26 & 27 (SUBJ. TO MD, FOR PUBLIC ' HWY. ON LOT 26) INC. OF ALLEY VA�ATED 7/7/64 LYING AWACENT TIFUMO. (SLW. TO DRAINAGE AND V ILITY ELSE. TO CITY OF FRIDLEY UVEER VAG_ II-0 ALI- ), BLWK 4' HAMILTON AS ADDITION. TO M HANICSVILIE. ' WHEMS, certain special assessments have b;i= levied with respect to c(itain land and said land has subseVentl,y been sui;livided. NOW,: THFhEFOHE Br. IT RESOLVED, as followe: That the - assessment levied against the fbll,)#ng described paroels, to-wit: Parcel 1175,, Lot 278 Also ine. Wj of alley •tac. 7/7/64 Zying ad ja(xAt- thereto (Subj* to drainage and utility aaae :,to City of Fridley over vacated alley)p Block 4# Hamiltonds Add• to Mechanle.mil.le, man and shall be apportioned and divided as follws: - 2d.ml wraL Funa Lots 26 & 27,, Block Parcel 11708 Hamilton +s Regular S.A. Add. to Mechanicsville • Division of Parcel ARO-N ved hMd Lot 260 Block 48 Parcel 11708 Hamilton's Regular SA, Add. to Mechanicsville Lot 270, Block 4, Parcel 117% HamilLonfe Regular S.A. Add. to Mechanicsville or .Wall AWMI $ ,►..fD A' &. $ 493.35 Ori Ma Amount $ V1.67 $ 2,;,'468 $ 495.35 ADOFM BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MDJZr THIS DAY or - 19650 •OR .. William Z Nee • ATTESTs CITY CLM - iisrvin .C. Brnnsell 74 0 RESOLUTION NO, .._.19b5 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING TV- SPLITT'1NG OF Sl c,CIAL ASSESSMENTS ON PARCEL 11458 TH. PT. OF LOT 20 WHICH LIES N. of S. 178' OF SAID LOT 20o (EX. WILY 200 OF TH. PT. JF SAID LOT 20 AitjVE DESG.), AUDITOR'S SUIT. ,#92. WHEREAS, certain special assessments have :een levied with respect to certain land and said land has subsequently been suodivided, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, as follows: That the assessment levied against the following described parcels# to -wit: Parcel 1150, Th. pt. of lot 209 Aud.. Sub. #92 which :Lies N, of S. 1781 of said Lot 20, & which lies S. of N. 7140 of said Lot 208 ant. the Walt' 209 of tho pto of said Lot 20 above desc. thereof? many and shs11 be apportioned and divided as follows: Original Parcel Pt. of Lot 20, Parcel 11458 Auditor °s Sub. #92 Regular S.A. SW #48 SS #58 1965 Service Connections Pt. of Lot 20, Phreel 1145, Auditors Sub. #92 Pt. of Lot 208 Parcel 11500 Auditor's Sub. #92 Regular S.A. SW #48 SS #58 1965 Service Connections Regular $,A. SW #48 SS #58 1965 Service Connec {,ions Originni Amunt 183.30 517.03 .21.OG I J37e0Co� # 1#858,33 • P ,: $ 91.65 258052 10050 568050 91.00 258.6 10:(i0 568.50 $ 19854-33 ADOPTED BY THE CITY: COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ?ATMEY THIS DAY OF .........._, - 19650 MAYOR — William J. Nee • ATTZST: ITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunel' 75 RESOLVaGli NO..�L /f — .5_ • RESOWTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF TIRES BE IT RESOLVED by.the Council of the City of Fridley, as follows: 1. That it is in the beat interest of the City to award bid contracts for the following items or materials: 40 Passenger Tires Tubeless 4 Ply 7.60x15 20 Passenger Snow Tires Tubeless 4 Ply 7.60x15 5 Pairs of Snow Chains Heavy Duty 7.60x15 2 Pairs of Chains Heavy Doty 7.00x17 and additional truck and grader tires as listed in the specifications. 2. A.copy of the specifications for the above described items and materials, together with a proposal for the method of purchase and the payment thereof have been presented to the Council by the City Manager and the same are hereby approved and adopted as plans and specifications, and the method of acquisition and payment to be required by the City with respect to the acquisi- tion of said items and.materials. 3. The purchase of said items and materials described above shall • be effected by sealed bids to be received and opened by the City of Fridley on the 17th day of January, 1966. The City Manager is directed and authorized to advertise for the pur- chase of said items and materials by sealed bid proposals under notice as provided by law and the Charter of the City of Fridley, the notice to be substantially as that shmm by Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of by reference. Said notice shall be published at least twice in the official newspaper of the City of Fridley. PASSED AND ADOPM THIS DAY OF , 1965 BY THE CITY COUNCIL. ATTEST: CITY CLMM - Marvin Co. Brunsell 40 MAYOR - WILLIAM J. N= 76 • CITY OF FRIDM BID NOTICES TIRES AND CHAINS the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota will accept bids on tires and chains on the lath Day of January, 1966 until 12:00 o'clock noon on said date at the City Hall, 6431 University Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota 55421 (Te1.560- 3450). All bids must meet the minim m requirements of the specifications. Failure to comply with this section can result in disqualifi- cation of the bid. Each bid shall be accompanied by a Certified Check, Cashier's Check, Cash or Bid Bond in an amount of not less than 5% of the bid, which check, cash or bond shall be forfeited if bidder neglects or refuses to enter into a contract, after his bid has been accepted. The Ci�y reserves the right to accept the bid which is determined to be in the best interests of the City. The City reserves the • right to reject any and all bids and waive any informalities or technicalities in any bid. The City Council also reserves the right to consider ,such factors as time of delivery or performance, experience, responsibility of the bidder, past performance of similar types of items or materials, availability of products and other similar factors that it may determine to be in the -best interests of the City. Copies of the specifications and general conditions may be examined in the office of the City Engineer. All bids must be submitted in sealed envelopes and plainly marked on the outside with "TIRE BID ". Publishs January 5, 1965 January 12, 1965 • EARL P. WAGNER City Manager 77 RESOLUTION NO. l,L / ( 1965 A RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING OF CERTAIN FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council has previously authorised certain expenditures beyond the budgeted amounts allocated to the various departments of the City's General Government not previously anticipated in the 1965 Budget, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, By the Council of the City of Fridley meeting at a regular session on the 20th day of December, 1965, as follows: 1. That appropriations for the following activities be reduced as follows: Finance Auditing Boards and Commissions Fire Inspection Library Reserve for Contingencies TOTAL $ 1,850.00 800.00 2,000.00 2,150.00 500.00 100.00 15 079.00 22,479.00 73 2. That appropriations for the following activities be increased as follows: City Council $ 4,000.00 City Manager 650.00 . Election and Voter Registration 1,650.00 Building and Grounds 10,000.00 Civil Defense 150.00 Public Works 1,500.00 Street Lighting, 250.00 Parks, Recreation and Band 2,754.00 Hospitalisation Insurance 1,525.00 TOTAL 22,479.00 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS TH DAY OF , 1965. MAYOR - William J. Nee ATTEST: • CITY CLBRL - Marvin C. Brunsell 0 r 7r. RESOWnOH No. A RESOLUTION AM MING RESOLUTION N0. 158 -1963 ENTITLED: "ESTABLISHING WORKING CONDITIONS, WAGES AND HOURS FOR EMPLOYBES EMPMM BY THE MUNICIPAL LIQM STORE (OFF - SALE) ". WHEREAS, the resolution adopted by the City Council on the 218t day of October, 1963, and known as Resolution No. 158 -1963 concerning establishing working conditions, wages and hours for employees employed by the Municipal Liquor Store (Off- Sale), is in need of amendment.and extension from the termination date provided for presently in Article YIV of said resolution. NOW, TMEFOgE, BE IT RBSOLVBD by the City Council that Resolution No. 158 -1963 establishing working conditions, wages and hours for employees employed by the Municipal Liquor Store (Off -Sale) be hereby amended.as follows, to -wit: ARTICLE XII RATBS OF PAY Section 1: • Clerk Clerk & Stockman Stockman January 1, 1966 HoHours $2.22 /hoar $2.22 /hour $2.08 /hour New Off -Sale Clerks will start at $2.00 per hoar for six (6) months. ARTICLE RIV This resolution shall be effective as of January 1, 1966 and shall remain in fall force and effect until December 31, 1966, and shall remain in fall force and effect from year to year thereafter unless written notice is given by either party sixty (60) days prior to December 31, 1966, or in any year thereafter. PAS= AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF s 1965 By TU CITY COUNCIL OB'Ti CITY qF FRLDLEY. CITY OF FRIDLEY, Mgt mon BY: • William J. Nee, MAYOR AY MT: Marvin C. Brunsell, CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #23 -1965 ENTITLED "ESTABLISHING WORKING CONDITIONS, WAGES AND. HOURS FOR EM MEES EMPLOYED BY THE MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STOPS". WHEREAS, Minneapolis Local Joint Executive Board of the Hotel Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, A.F.L. - C.I.O., Local Unions No. .152 and No. 458, as bargaining representatives of the employees of the Municipal Liquor Store of the City of Fridley, has presented to the Council. of the City of Fridley, a resolution relating to the working conditions, wages and hours for employees of the Municipal Liquor Store of the City of Fridley, and WHEREAS, Article XII, Wage Scale of said Resolution 23 -1965 is effective until January 1, 1966, and WHE]MAS, it is necessary at this time to establish a wage scale for employees employed by the Municipal Liquor Store for the period January 1, 1966 to January 1, 1967. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, that Article XII of Resolution #23 -1965 be, and it is hereby, amended to read as follows, to -wit. Effective January 1, 1966, all bartenders working forty -eight (48) hours per week shall receive One Hundred Forty and 40/100 ($140.40) Dollars per • week. All extra bartenders shall receive Twenty -Two and Np /100-($7k.00) Dollars for work done an a working day which consists of eight (8) working hours,. All waitresses working forty (40) hours per week shall receive Sixty -six and no /100 ($66.00) Dollars; all short hour waitresses shall be paid`One and 90/100 ($1.90) Dollars per hour. New employees hired for forty (40) hours per week shall start at $1.50 per hour for the probationary period of six (6) months. Short hour waitresses, when new employees; will, start at $1.65 per hour for six (6) months. New bartenders will start at $2.50 per hour for six (6) months. I day off with pay will be granted a full time employee on his birthdate. Severance pay will accrue at lh days per year for full time employees, but is payable only if such employee has been a full time working employee for 48 consecutive months. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1965. William J. Nee, MAYOR ATMOTs 0 Marvin C. Brnosell, CITY CLERK GJ PLANNING C(*WAS1ON MISTING • DECEMBER 16, 1965 PAGE 1 the meeting was called to order at 8 :15 P.K. by Chairman Zravik. Viers Present: 1bgbes, Bergman, ICravik, Bandel, Johanson Others Present: City Manager Wagner, Engineering Assistant Clark Planning Consultant: Tom Hodge APPROVE MINUU8 OF PLANNING COlMMMION MISTING: NOVEMMM 18, 19654 MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Mashes, that the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of November 18, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. NOTION by Berm, seconded by Johanson, that the Commission receive the minutes of the Plats and Subdivisions Sub - Committee meeting of December 7, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. • NOTION by Bergman, seconded by Johanson, that the Commission receive the minutes of the Streets and Utilities Sub- Committee meeting of December 7, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. 1. 2. 0 MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Johanson that the Commission receive the minutes of the Parks and Playgrounds Sub - Committee meeting of November 16, 1965. Upon a voice vote, the motion carried. NOTION by Bergman, seconded by Johanson, that the Public Hearing of the Proposed Preliminary Plat, #65 -03, Pearson °s industrial Park, be continued until the January 13, 1966 meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. Mr. Harlan Lindman discussed the proposed plat of the parcel, showing the new plans which Mr. Hodge had suggested be done. Be stated the area is approximately eleven acres and is zoned R -1. PLANNING COMISSIOU STING - DECEMBER 16, 1965 PACE 2 Be stated that Winslow & Associates were not interested in rezoning anything at the present time, but interested-in getting a Special Use Permit for a nursing home imd were willing to work with the Planning Commission to get the most practical uae of the land. The Nursing Rome is in the Northeast corner of the Parcel and has direct access to the hospital and the church and seemms to be the moue logical place to put it at the present time. It was explained to Nx. Lindman that, because special use permits were being requested for two Nursing homes in the same area, it was felt more time was =*did to study the situation. However, it should not be necessary to hold up a spvsial use )e=mit because of the developing of the rest of the plat, as long as the description and location are satisfactory and the street pattern approval at a future time. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission rewmend approval of the Nursing Haute concept by Winslow & Associates, Itv,., Parcel 21,00, in the general location and nature proposed on this plan and that such a motion be referred to the Council and the Board of Appeals. rpon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 3, LOT SPLIT BEQUEST: L.S. #65 -17, V. M. NAGEL: NA OF THS NA OF SECTION, 12. DIr,,Nagel was present and explained the lot split. MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission concur with the Plats and Subdivisions Sub - Committee and the Streets and Utilities Sub-Committee recommending the granting of the Lot Split #65 -17 b3ing Outlot #1, Nagel °s Woodlands and 264 feet of the unplatted land to the East upon dedication of a utility easement on the South 20 feet. Upon 3 voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 4. VACATION REQUEST; _ SAV065 -05,_ DONALD _BABiNSKI:__ b RAILROAD TRACKS: Janes Gibbs explained the reason for the vacation request was that Mr. Babinski wished to build an industrial structure and would need the alley so that rear yard requirements could be met. MOTION by Bergman, seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission concur with the Streets and Utilities Sub - Committee and recommend approval of the vacation request (SAV #65 -05) of Donald Babineki to vacate the six foot alley an the North end of Lot's 1 thru 8, Block 13, Spring Brook Park Addition running from Ashton Avenue to Railroad Tracks with the City-retaining same width for utility easement. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. S. I=. SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #65 -1.0 D2NA%Z? R. PIBLOW: LOT 3, AUDITOR'S SUEDIMION 11291 Mrs. Pielow was present. The Committee reviewed the action taken by the Plats and Subdivisions and Streets and Utilities Sub - Committee on December 7th. PLANNING COMSSION MTI.NG - DECMIBER 16, 1965 PAGE 3 • MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission concur with the Plats and Subdivisions and Streets and Utilities Sub - Committees and recommend approval of the Lot Split Request (L.S. #65 -10), Donald Pielov, being Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision #129, subject to the dedication of the North 25 feet for street and 5 foot utility easement on West aside of Lot 3 for utilities' and drainage. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 6. 7. S. 2. 3. 4 -4A. 5 -5A Mr. Wayne Stewart was present. Mr. Wagner read the Board of Appeals minutes which referred to the Special Use Permit.. Mr. Stewart said the bungalows would be split level type, but will not all be of the same type and would vary the way they are built on the lots. During the discussion, it was discovered that the plat had not been recorded. As long as the plat was over a year old, the procedure had to be gone through again. 1rION by Hughes, seconded by Johanson, that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Special. Use 'Permit for the Double Bungalows,. Wayne Aa Stewart, Lots 2, 3, 4 -4A, 5 -5A, 6 -6A, 7 and 8, Block 1, Gaileview Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. tf(Y1°tON by Hughes, seconded by Johanson, that a public hearing date of January 13, 1966 be sat for tbo prel3rjnaz -* plat (P.S. #64 -05) Wayne A. Stewart, being a replet of Bloch 1, Scat RalZ Block 2, Berlin Addition. Upon a voice vote, ail voting aye, the motion carried. Mr. Nygard was present and stated he would be willing to work with Council and Planning Commission. It was noted, that if the lot was divided into two Iota, the larger one being in the back, the assessment rate would be smaller because of the zoning. MOTION by Johanson, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission concur with Council on the Lot Split #65 -14, H. M. Nygard, being that part of Lot 14, Auditor's Subdivision #129 lying West of the East 273.0 feet, except West 110 . feet taken for Central Avenue by splitting the land into two lots only, the lot facing Central Avenue being not less than 1001x1321, the balance of the land being the second lot. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 10 Dr. Hayano stated he would like to request rezoning this lot to the now medical category, and he would talk to the neighbors again. MOT1014 by Hughes, seconded by Bergman, that the Planning Commission set a public hearing on Januaay 13, 1966 for the rezoning request, #65 -05, Dr. George Hayano, Lot 10, Plat 1, Rice Creek Terrace, to rezone from R -1 (single family dwelling) to CR -1 (medical offices). Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. PLANNING COtAWSION M ETUG - DECEHM 16, 1965 PAGE 4 • 9. REZONING REsUEST: Z #63-02 SW FLORENCE SWAN. AND BERNARD JL'dXO KI: EASTERLY END OF IRON TOW AND ADJACENT TO ASATOii STREET. AUDITOR'S §M DIYI8IQii X103 AND IR0�1'1�ON INDUSTRIAL PARK: - ��r 104 11.. Mrs. Swanson was present and,steted that Mr. Julkowski has agreed to request rezoning for his land adjoining hers. She stated the neighbors were each more favorable toward double bungalows than they were before. It was suggested the Engineering Department be requested to draw up a map showing lots and zoning of the area and have them ready by January 13, 1966. MOTION by Bergman; seconded by Hughes, that the Planning Commission direct the City Manager to get some data on the general area of the rezoning request (ZOA #63 -02) Mrs. Florence Swanson and Bernard Julkowski, being the Easterly end of Ironton Street and adjacent to Ashton Street, Auditor °s Subdivision #102 and Ironton Industrial Park, shoving the streets, lots with buildings on them, clearly defining what utilities are present, streets and buildings outside present zoning,and proposed zoning. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. rm! Outlot 1. lobe Mike Hafner explained that the original buyer backed out, but he would like, to have a special use permit for a nursing home for that parcel so that nothing else couWbe built on that lot as he felt it should be for a nursing home only. The Committee explained that, according to the Code, there is no way to reserve a piece of property for a special purpose. LOTION by Johanson, seconded by Bandel, that the Planning Commission continue the hearing for the special use permit for a nursing home in Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition, the southwest corner (200 6x6001), until such time that, Plans' are presented. Upon a voice vote, all vo'tiug aye, the motion carried. The Committee stated they felt a nursing horse would be the proper usage for this piece of land. There are two types of rezoning for this parcel, R -3A (general multiple family dwellings) and C -1 (local business areas). The Commission felt they would like to have more commercial than R -3A in this area and have encouraged comsoercial for land adjacent to the hospital. Because the structures, as presented in the plan at this meeting, use most of the land, Mr. Hodge felt that there was not enough room for expansion for the future. The problem of traffic to the various land uses does not seem fluid under the present layout. It was felt that more study of traffic to the hospital, nursing homes, clinic should be made so that the residential areas could be free of this additional traffic, and this could be alleviated through proper building layouts. This area, according to Mr. Hodge, is potentially one of the best in Fridley and should be carefully planned. • a 85 PLmm CO assiOPI ma A MCEMM 168 1965 FAGS 5 Mr. Bft meth stated tbat, os Mt. Uodme pointed out In his rae 1 low. there appears to be definitely sawe advantageous cbemges to the traffic flea, possible style or specific location of buildings and recreation and pwidxg area. Be did not feel the proposed rezoning plan would prohibit the development of these names and dial not feel the Commission should hold up the rezoning. Be said if tbue is to be ,good sad cw*etent use of the land, he wished to coament favorably of Mr. Hochas °s recommendatione as to the detail development and construction of property and buildings as plain ed. Mr. Rrtavik comentsd that the Commission's responsibility is the disposition of the Ind$ not what is iwolved -in the use. Tedmicai adjustment to the lines or street sews easily later, at the time the builds a layouts are review*d. Thor* vas a disaussion of the traffic on Lyric Lazne and the possibilipy of shifting some to Oats ©ens Bead. The pxescnM plan puts a lot of traffic on Lyr1p Lena. id nco by Bps secondod by Johansm, that the Planning ComAssion close the public Asaring of the Rimon:tng, ZQ& #65-039 Alike Hafner, Outlet 1, Melody Manor 4th Addition except that part tealwa by Dr. Lester for Clinic and parcel for Nursizig jkM, and recommd approval of the rezoning plan as presented wi.ldii stipulation that the daveloper rGvj(mw the c: is and datlow mendee relative to the. streets and site plan by Mr. H*dhe. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye. except Hughes vho voted nay,, tha mmt:ion carried. • 12. PtlSLIC MORW P@l4MED PBELI�i% CP.S. 922 -1yR). C ,. [.'B_ PEA. WI M: West 31 of M7 -% Of ftct:lula 14 blest of University Avenue and South The Plats and Subdivisims Sub -Comit:tee at their meeting of December 16th, prior to Plannine Commission mating, raccrmmub there be further study on the Plat with 1-fr. Bodne's recaumendeatl= : i taind an the zonirZ and land use of the arm. It tm noted that the StreatB and Militias Sub - Committee reed that the service drive on Com=ce Parts P'.at be increased from 40 feet to 50 feat. 7he Commission felt the lot arrim e=nts `could not lead themselves to street planning, hirers they did rot, foes this should hold up the plat. H MMT by Bergman® sremLed by Hughes, that the Plazmizng Commission recommend to Council that the preliminary pleat, P.S. #62 -iOR9, Commerce Parks by Mike Hafaar, being. that port of the 1474 of ...10at:ion 118 lyiz:g South of the ceutorline of Osborne Bead and lying hest of the aev;erline of State Trunk Hi&nq No. 47, also Lot 4, and that part of Lot 5, Rwiaed Auditor's Subdivision Aka. 77, lying South of the centarline of Osborne Road as zm laid out and located according to the plat thereof on file and of retard in the off -ica of the Register of iDeads in and for Anoka County, M rmesota, be apprmed. Upraa a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried. 13. pUBLFZ_ =A=r,: I =OIL_ ' ` K iSgOJ� NLiItS Iii: done proposed preliminary plat 02 -100., Commerce 1'ark from )..p? (single family duelling) to C -1 (local business arena). The Commission noted that the northern part of the plat is to be Moned C -2 (general business areas) and the a outhh taro thirds M -1 (light industrial areas) as depicted on the stwtch submitted by Mr. Hodne. pLAIRMW C= aSSWN MMUM - MXMUM 16, 1965 PAM fr It rasa the opinion of W. Nodne thqit; light industrial sbauld be now t'bo b1SbwW and h"" iadctstrial "An x. the Vail;*". the possibility of running the co mseiai strip all the wW to Coon Rapids vas diaaesseod. ift, Boxwon asked that the Planning Commission got the bonait of Mr. ttsd®e's advias on the zoning of tho whole area for the J=mMy 1.3, 1966 meeting. r4s Coamiesfan felt, an the basis that it is very easy to be wSative about the pswsposal, but do not feel that they could be nagative. in this case bosom they did not have some alternative to offer. MMOR by Bargmang seconded by Johanson, that the Pl=niag Vision amtitaus the public bearing of the twoning request, ZQA #65 -09e psaposed psslimiuM plat #62 -i08, Comaaerco PosI,. Plat, Alike Hafner, to the January 139 1966 meeting with tin stipulation that the comments and recoamoendat Lens made relative to zoning and site .plans of Mr. Hedne be taviewed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, except Dughes, vho voted nay,, the wotion paseed. �4lBt4Tt Chairman ftwik adjousnad the meeting at 1100 o'clock P.M. and the following items WWO continued nn.il January 13, 1966: oeD MM STtlCif i Hmssim Code Designated as Chapter 51 of the City Code of ftidisy.. H=163 2�209 070111. MnUM 052 - 8?. LWTS PARKS For Study. OR :OMDZM - ftaEtiag complete ordinance. Respectfully sabmitt "t Saaol- 0 wins Rftwaiag soau tasg 0 E ,- AN Onni"M TO MW M am COM OF To CIY'it OF nEz.u, KNLn6 M SY MA=V A CHOU IN ZONING DISTRICTS 2bs Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SuCTT M 1. Appendix D of the City Coda of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SBCTIIYT 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described ass Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1 through 17. Block 20 and Lot 19 Block 3j, Cp®srce Park, lying in Section 110 T -300 1.24, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known as C -2 (general business areas). • SZCTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to ohm** the Official Zoning map to show said tract or area from monad districts H•2 (limited multiple family dwellings), N -3 (gaaaral nultiple family dwellings) and Mrl (light Industrial areas) to C -2 (general business areas). PASSZD BY TO CM COOBCrL OF THS CM 01p rxmoo.BY 2M DAY OF _ _ � 0 1965. MAYOR William J. lee CITY CUR Marvin C. Brunse 1 Public Bombs: - s' First Baadings � Second Readings, Publish.......: 0 S7 W B • . No. AN ORDIMM TO ANWD MM CITY CCU CP TO CIli Q nUff Y, HINN MU BY MAKM A CMGZ IN ZONING DISTNIII, Tm Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SECTIO�d 1. Appendiz D of the City Code of Fridley is SW4&d as hereinafter indicated. SBX.'21 0N 2. The tract or area within the County sf Anoka and the City of Fridley and described ass Lots 18.through 29, Block 29 Conmaarce Parka lyiM in Section il,, T-30, 8-249 County of Anoka, State of Mirinesota Is herbby designated to be in the Zoned District known as M-1 Clight industrial area). SD4"!?ON 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to dmige the official zoning map to show said treat or area from zoned district M-2 (heavy industrial area) to M•1 (light industrial areas). PASSED BY TS$ CITY COiJ IL OF THE CITY OF FRIUM THIS DAY OF_...�.....__.........�.. _....... 1963. MAYM William J. ilea ►=4T, CM CLBM Marvin C. Brunseil Publia Searing: • first Reading: Second Reading: Publish.......: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODS OF THE CITY OF • FRIDLW. MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANCE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: S 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amanded as hereinafter indicated. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: Beginning at the Northeast (N8) corner of said Outlot No. 1; thence South along the East line of said Outlot No. 1 to the South line; thence West along the South line of said Outlot No. 1 a distance of 190 feet; thence North parallel to the West line of said Outlot No. 1 a distance of 202.01 feet; theme West parallel to the North line of said Outlot No. 1 a distance of 364.38 feet; thence North parallel to the West line a distance of 227.30 feet; thence East parallel to the North line of said Outlot No. 1 a distance of 330.00 feet; thence North parallel to the West line of said Outlot No. 1 a distance of 150.00 feet to the North line of said Outlot No. 1; thence East along the North line of said Outlot No. 18 216.27 feet to the point of beginning; thence terminat- ingo all lying in Section 11,, T -309 R -24, County of Anoka,, State of Minnesota. . to hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known as R -3A ( general multiple family dwelling). SIMON 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area from zoned district 8 -1 `single family dwelling areas) to R -3A (general multiple family dwellings). PASSED BY ZBS CM COCNCIL OF 20 CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY a _ _ . 1965. MAYOR William J. Nee Cm Cif Marvin C. Brus"ll Public 8estings Brat Reading: Second Reading: • Publish.......: i� ORDINANCH NO AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TES CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDUM, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISWCT3 The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SECTION 11 Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: That part of the West % of the Southwest it of section 14, and that part of the beginning at the Northwest corner of said Outlot 1, thence East along the North line of said Outlot 1 a distance of 217,82 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence contima Bast along the North line of said Outlot 1, a distance of 330 feet; thence South on a line parallel to the West line of said Outlot 1 a distance of 150 feet; thence West parallel to the North line of said Outlot 1 a distance of 330 feet; thence North parallel to the Wiest line of'said Outlot 1, 150 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence terminating, all lying in Section 11. T -30, R -24, County of Anoka, State Of Minnesota Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known . as C-1 (local business areas.) SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area from saved district R -1 (single family dwellings) to C-1 (local business areas.) PASSED BY THE CITY OOONCLL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLBY THIS DAY OF , 1965. MAYOR will J. = ATTB3T: CITY,CLERK Marvin C. Brunel! Public Rearing -; ....r......._..�.._..._.... First Readings Second Reading: Publish.......t • 99 91 MEMO REPORT TO: FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL FROM: HODNE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS RE: DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS BY: Kermit V. Crouch, Assoc. AIP DATE: 16 December 1965 1. MELODY MANOR APARTMENT /MOTEL PROPOSAL (20A #65 -08) It is recommended that the Melody Manor rezoning application be denied pending a detailed study of the circulation /land use aspects of the entire hospital /clinic /nursing homes /motel /apartment complex - portions of which now exist or are proposed for near future construction. Whereas the proposed uses all appear to be logical and proper, the proposed circulation to and from and among the uses is questionable. As now proposed, many of the uses would have access via. Lyric Lane which now serves as a local residential street and should be preserved as such. A preferable circulation solution, as suggested on the accompanying map, is to provide access to the proposed uses entirely via Osborne Road (an arterial street) and not from Lyric Lane. Thus, traffic to and from the hospital, nursing homes, apartments, clinic, and motel and shops would not interfere with the desired quiet living environment of the Melody Manor residential neighborhood. Beyond the major circulation aspects recommended above, the following recommendations are also made: A. Provide an adequate "green space" buffer between the residences facing Lyric Lane and the higher intensity uses to the north. Based entirely upon sound planning principles, another tier of residences should be constructed along Lyric Lane thereby resulting in the change of land use occuring at rear lot lines rather than along a residential street. It appears, however, that an additional tier of lots cannot be realistically provided due to the status of the hospital construction. B. Provide a fence or natural screen between the proposed apartment • parking spaces and the residential lots along Jackson Street. - A prefer, - able solution would be to face the parking spaces away from the adjacent residences. N MEMO REPORT - DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS • FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA (Z) Z. 0 r� L C. Develop the proposed recreational area in a more logical location in relation to the apartment residents. COMMERCE PARK (ZOA #65 -09) It is recommended that the proposed Commerce Park rezoning application be denied. Whereas the proposed circulation system is quite appropriate and logical, the proposed land use arrangement is questionable as discussed below. A. Sound planning principles can for commercial development in nodes or centers rather than in a strip pattern along a major thoroughfare. Hence, commercial establishments relate more logically to each other and afford stronger identity to potential clientele. An additional factor is that the visual image of Fridley is made stronger by commercial nodes as opposed to a continuous commercial strip along the thorough- fares which traverse the community. B. The light industrial sites as proposed would not invite sound industrial development due to their location between a heavy industrial area and the rear of a strip commercial area. Light industrial plants desire exposure to the passing motorist, and if this is provided, the visual character of the plants will more likely be developed and maintained in an attractive manner than if they are hidden from view. The accompanying map suggests how the area might be developed using the circulation system as proposed but shifting the desired land uses according to the objectives discussed above. A further consideration, perhaps of greatest importance, is the policy regard- ing the most appropriate use of the entire area north of 69th Avenue to the City Limits, lying between the railroad and University Avenue. The Planning Commission is rightly concerned about the ultimate development of this area, and has requested its planning consultant to study the matter; however, since such a study has City -wide and even regional -wide implications, the planning consultant feels that this would be best considered during the up- coming 11701" comprehensive planning program. The land use suggestions shown on the accompanying map of Commerce Park are made upon the premise that the area has potential for industrial and commercial development. L� ZAEMO REPORT - DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA (3) 3. WEST MOORE LAKE DRIVE EXTENSION (M. S. A. #302) It is recommended that West Moore Lake Drive (61st Avenue) be extended easterly across State Highway 65 to connect with Rice Creek Road (CO. RD. #6) at Old Central Avenue as shown on the accompanying map. The rationale behind this recommendation is as follows: A. West Moore Lake Drive now serves several major traffic generators - Junior High School, Senior High School, Parkview Grade School. Fridley Commons Park, the Parochial School and Church east of University Avenue; and the Church and commercial area west of T. H. #65. Additional proposed traffic generators on the street include an elementary school east of the Mississippi River and Shorewood Shopping Center east of T. H. #65. Thu.6, West Moore Lake Drive acts as an arterial street which carries traffic to and from these traffic generators, and as a collector street which serves the residences located one - fourth to one -half mile north and south of the street. S. It is preferable that a crossing of T.H. #65 be provided at 62nd Street rather than at 63rd Street because of a greater distance from the major arterial street crossing at Mississippi Street (CO. RD. #6). As a general rule, collector streets should be spaced approximately one -half mile apart. The 62nd Street crossing would be three - eighths mile from Mississippi Street compared to only one - fourth mile between 63rd and Mississippi Streets. C. The easterly extension of West Moore Lake Drive to meet Rice Creek Road is desirable to provide good access to the Shorewood Shopping Center from the residential areas both east and west of the Center. D. Whereas the Shorewood Shopping Center definitely will cause increased traffic on West Moore Lake Drive past the 15 "facing" residences at the northwest edge of Moore Lake, the proposed extension of the street will not cause a significant traffic increase past the homes. Traffic generated by the elementary /junior high /senior high school and park complex will use West Moore Lake Drive regardless of whether or not it is extended across T. H. 65. The extension will merely provide a more direct route to the school /park complex from residences east of T. H. #65. It is recommended that a minor re- alignment of the proposed extension be provided farther to the southeast than is now proposed; thereby providing additional parking space for the lst stage building of the Shopping Center. 93 NYGARD PIA O' SALES & SERVICE 7451 OLD CENTRAL AVE. N. E. MINNEAPOLIS IL MINNESOU • Mayor o'Zm Nee City gall beoomber loth 1965 Fridley, Minnesota ;'Dear Sir s 8o= At the planning commission meeting 2e04mbert 16th, I said that I would abide by whatever deoision the board would mQW regarding this lot split on my property at 7451 Central Ave. Naturally, I oould do title otherwise especially if the council and the mayor oonoluded that the Central Ave lot would be too small for business lot. 'mile that may very well be true,* By splitting the land in two portions, that is lZbt 1 1321 lot on Central Ave and aproxinstely the some size faoing Fireside give. The Central AT* lot will have to absorb* about half of the special asessments of the- - Fireside Drive of this property together with "All the asesements" of the Central Ave side* shat will this do? Or aocomplish? 1. It will bring the present Central Ave lot special asessments from $2.oW.o0 or 14.000.00 to $6.000.00 to $0.000.00 or possibly higher. L. It will raise the cost of one single lot in speotal asessment. Can I get a honorable prioo selling those lots? Can anybody get a honorable prioo for lots with that kind of special asessments "in this area at this time or in the near fature" ? From time to time, I have oonsulted, cheoked and raven listed this property. Teo, I have looked into this very oarefully and have disoussed the various phases with realty men, ( and I might mention of various - kinds too) speotilators, brokers, builders developers and above all, Lending Institution. My findings were. l. There were none that were interested enough or willing to put. their money on the line after they farad out the amount of tares and speciall asessmente. 1. &Ilmost all were interested if they oould handle " My investments" with phoney papers, phoney soheemes and wallpaper artists. 3. The Lending Instit$ine told me that the "Trailers, Trailer oourts and junk yards have ooapelled them to reduoe their loan commitments in this erea. ( remember, I can clean out my yard and remove all undesirable items ) ( from my yard within one month if I sold some of the land . ) - ( Could you do the same with the ( Sunk Trailers? Trailer Court T Junk Yards? ) ? ?? :' ?; ? ? ? ? ? ? ???? ? ??? Tne Central Ave Lots Being that Central Aie is 100 ft wide, the distance from the curb to alimost any buildings, that oould be built in the fature is as far as I con see quite adequate if the lot is split to the proposed 90 ft dept ;,, , �i s �njp.l 11. Well �nn a TC t 4,,,,r1 oentinued next page w r gaga No 2 enclosure I also submitted survayor oertificate for that sine and I also had the back lot survayed to another split so that there would be 3 lots. In resent weeke I have noted that Vernon Larson ( my neighbor ) have asked for lot split and Zoning for "Double Bungalows) *'Thy not sone the whole area inoluding south of Fireside Drive for Double bungalows T' I believe most of the property owners here in the imediate Brea would go along with that, As for the lots on Central Ave, they could remain shopping area as they are now providing there lei a definate understanding that one will not build a trailer court, Glue faotory or any of that sorte Tail way, there is possibly some It" of survival and pasaibly something can be worked out from this srsse Well what do you say Y I certainly hope something to the iatrest of the property owners can be aoomplishode Inclosed please find the surrayors certificates, Thaydring yon very k:bndly* Yours Very Truly Ea �J Im M ti H N �o Wpc� 1N 0 � CO 0 H O GQO� O er1 ba "{ . 4.1 ON a S w:9 a 0 c0 cm N o N 11� NO a p'! N o. N C7 l 41 111 " cm °d CQ ° 1° N i3r O N O b 1 0 l� is O W N 111 t1p r'1 N 0 W � � O v cv m ca co � `�' co C4 Q t-i l\k tom- Q N w • v� • � N W •� ' O W � w � N .ya H ep `D f� A� i+ 4 ,. cm H a Q ,�Vy g m �' f '� +qs� O V3 u o �1�mu} UOl� co Vim® N c1rD� lt1 0 aO 0 0 0 O � M `O ri N ft tL 3 0 �J Im M ti H N �o Wpc� 1N 0 � CO 0 H O GQO� O er1 ba "{ . 4.1 ON a S w:9 a 0 c0 cm N o N 11� NO a p'! N o. N C7 l 41 111 " cm °d CQ ° 1° N i3r O N O b 1 0 l� is O W N 111 t1p r'1 N 0 W � � O v cv m ca co � `�' co C4 Q t-i l\k tom- Q N w • v� • � N W •� ' O W � w � N .ya H ep `D f� A� i+ 4 ,. cm H a Q ,�Vy g m �' f '� +qs� O V3 u o �1�mu} UOl� co Vim® Hy O� r4 N O n Ih N 1 .7 ItPI A 0 a 4fi 15 N [��- N4 N pp�� O a pp No � t►' f I'1 NO 1%O IA 0 Cry O 0 q 391 409- b Cw CC, 00 CV r-0 w 0% N 44 O cV a %O .� e-tV�yy1 H cu a4 VN x M so t 1 1t1 0 N cm H C�ci 03 Q! � 4f} Hy O� r4 N O n Ih N 1 .7 ItPI A 0 a 4fi 15 N [��- N4 N pp�� O a pp No N t►' f I'1 NO 1%O r1 4fi Cry O� C q 391 409- AD w 0% 40 44 % N te" r 1 N4 C 0 O a No i.ia t►' f I'1 fh w 4fi rl m C q 391 409- o. 0 O O CIO .Q A g N g 1 3 +N . O a 0 0 0 0 0 N ' r4 O i+ O .� a �n 19 F2 0 m a �} z 03 N � � e a� 40 a � v `�`� `°acv"►° � fl N te" r 1 O C 0 No i.ia t►' art I'1 fh w rl O O CIO .Q A g N g 1 3 +N . O a 0 0 0 0 0 N ' r4 O i+ O .� a �n 19 F2 0 m a �} z 03 N � � e a� 40 a � v `�`� `°acv"►° � fl REPORT TO CITY MANAGER NOVEMBER, 1965 NUMBER OF LICENSES CURRENTLY IN EFFECT AND LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TO DATE TYPE NUMBER FEES COLLECTED' ELECTRICAL ?6 1,140 EXCAVATING 27 405 GAS $ 19 #789- 690 GENERAL 246 7#400 HEATING b8 1#� HOUSE MOVING 45 MASONRY OIL HEATING 34 510 90 PLASTERING 'x20 PLUMING 75 1 #225 ROOFING 10 iso SIGNS -17' 230 WELL DRILLING PERMIT FEES 1965 1964 'nas YEAR LAST YEAR PERMIT NUMBERS TYPE NOVEMBER NOVEMBER TO. DATE TO DATE' #8576•#86i9 BUILDING $ 479 # 702 $ 19 #789- 12 #131' #5737 - #5786 ELECTRICAL 908 385 l3s259 8494 #3435 -#3468 HEATING 582 523 6,089 60531 #3901#3932 PLUMBING 542 416 7#509 5 #933' a ;IGNS 23 10 22h 91