The URL can be used to link to this page

01/20/1968 - 5867' �� JUEL MERCER - COUNCIL SECRETARY REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA JANUARY 20, 1969 - 7:30 P.M. � REGULAR COUI`CIL MEETING AGENDA - JANUARY 20, 1969 - 7:30 P.M. � — � I , I ' I ' ' ' t PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVpCATION: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATION OF AWARDS: Certificates of Appreciation Mr..Wilbur Whitmore, Police Commission Mr. David W. Larson Police Commission Mr. Eldon Schm�deke, Plats and Subdivisions � Streets and Utilities Mr. John Dunphy, Parks and Recreation Mr. Richard Dittes, Buildings Standards - Design Control PROCLAMATION BY MAYOR: Proclaiming January 19 - 25, 1969 to be "Jaycee Week" APPROV� AL_�F I"IINUTE S : Pages 1 - 20 Regular Council Meeting, January 6, 1969 pages 21 - 40 Public Hearing Meeting, January 13, 1969 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARINGS: None OLD BUSINESS: 1. Confirmation of Decision to Approve Placement of Garbage Cans in Driveways During Snow Emergency Period. Comment: See Minutes of January 13, 1969,pages 39 and 40) 2. Reaffirming Resolution 2-1969, 4 Resolution to the Village of Moundsview to Request Help From the Ramsey County Commissioners to Upgrade County Road H2 from County�s West Boundary Line to Trunk Highway No. 10, and copi� of communi- catior� written to Mounds View and Anoka County Commissioners. � Pages 41 41 A 41 B REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - JANUARY 20, 1969 OLD BUSI�ESS (Continued) 3. Consideration of Remaining Appointments to Commissions, Boards, Committees and Subcommittes for 1969 to Complete Resolution No. 3-1969. Comment: The appointment to Plats and Subs (Daryl Nagel) and the Industrial Development Commission were tabled 1/6/69) 4. Discussion Regarding New Guidelines for Board of Appeals (Request to have on agenda by Carl Paulson - tabled 12/16/68) NEW BUSINESS: 5, Proposed Metropolitan Section Tax Program Presented by Dean Lund. LComment: Material on this item will be found in the envelope with the Agenda.) 6. Consideration of Changes in Firemen's Relief Association Pension. Comment_ Material on this item will be found in the envelope with the Agenda.) 7. Consideration of Change in Capital Outlay Budget of Fire Dept. 8. Consideration of Fire Department Offieers Election and Appointments. PAGE 2 Page 42 Pages 43 & 44 Page 45 Page �46 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - JANUARY Z0, 1969 NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 9. Discussion Regarding Anoka County Association of Municipalities Dues for 1969. 10. Discussion Regarding If and When 39th Avenue Northeast from East River Road was vacated and if So, At Whose Request. (On Agenda at Request of Councilman Liebl). Coanment; The City Attorney will be prepared to comment regarding the legal implications of This Item) 11. Discussion of Sewer Agreement with Moundsview. 12. Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 8, 1969. 13. Receiving the Minutes of the Building Standards - Design Control Meeting of January 15, 1969. FAGE 3 Pages 47 - 50 Page 51 � Pages 52 - 61A Pages 62 & 63 REGULAR COUNCIL Nf�ETI:VG AGENDA - JANUARY 20, 1969 NEW BUSINESS ( Continued) 14. Second Reading of Ordinance Rezoning Part of Lot 9, A.S. ��'88 From R-1 to R-3A. Requested by Louis Momchilovich. �Comment: This Ordinance is brough Back for Second Reading because Mr. Momchilovich has submitted the final plans for the Building Permit.) 15. Receiving the Minutes of the.Human Relations Committee Meeting of November 21, 1968. 16. Receiving Bids and Awarding Contract for 3 Police Cars. (Bids Opened 11:00 A.M., January 20, 1969). 17. Resolution Ordering Improvement - Storm Sewer Project ��89. Comment_ The Hearing for this was Held on January 13th. This is the improvement of the culvert under the Minnesota Transfer Railway Tracks.) 18. Discussion of Additional Action Council Desires of Administration Prior to Consideration of Resol�ution on Storm Sewer Pro ject �680. Comment; The Public Hearing for this was held on January 13th. Council may want some additional information on this project.) PAGE 4 Pages 64 & 65 Pages 66 & 67 Page 68 Page 69 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - JANUARY 20, 1969 NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 19. Resolution Ordering Improvement - Water Project ��90 Addendum ��l) (Comment: This Public Hearing was held on January 13th and this is for the Waterline on 66th Avenue. Majority was for it.) Z0. Resolution Ordering Improvement - Street Project ST. 1969-1. Comnent: This Public Hearing was held on January 13th. If Project ��80 is not ordered in, then some of the streets will have to be deleted from the proposed resolution at this time.) PAGE 5 Page 70 Pages 71 - 75 21. Resolution Approving 10 Year Street Program. Pages 76 - 78 Comment: Informal Hearings were held on December 9, 1968 and January 13, 1969. If Council agrees with the plan, the Resolution would make it official). 22. Consideration of Vacation of a Portion of Marshall Street. Pages 79 - 80 Conment: The Hearing for this Vacation was Held January 13th. There was a strong objection from the City of Minneapolis, 23. Resolution Correcting Resolution No. 188-1968 Authorizing and Directing the Splitting of Special Assessments on Parcel 8400, Part of Section 3, a Portion of Which is Replatted into Pearson's 2nd Addition. Pages 81 - 82 R�GULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - JANUARY 20, 1969 NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 24. Petition on Improvement of West Service Road of T.H. ��47 North of Osborne Road. (Comment; This is for the Service Road to serve the Bob�s Produce Ranch Complex) 25. Licenses. 26. Claims. 27. Estimates. COMMUNICATIONS• A. Independent School District ��14: Resolution Requesting Side- walks and crossing signal. B. Hopewood Hi11s, Inc: Regarding Rezoning Request. C. Great Northern Railway; Utilities Improvement in Tracks South of I.694. PAGE 6 Page 83 Pages 84 & 85 Page 86 Pages 87 & 88 Page 89 Page 90 Pages 91 & 92 , REGUI�AR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - JANUARY 20, 1969 PAGE 7 ' —'---� � � __--_ COMMUNICATIONS (Continued) ' � � D. Civil Defense; Certification of Director. Page 93 ' E. Lee Walter; Opposition to Storm Sewer Project ��80 Page 94 ' F. Pennsylvania Oil; Opposing Improvement of T.H. ��65 West Pages 95 & 96 Service Road. , . G. Human Relations Committee: ,Recognition of Hans P. Meyerhoff. Page 97 ' ' ' VISITORS: ' � ' ADJOURN: � � , � , ' ' �� .- H � � ' , . N O T I C E Due to labor shortage and ever increasing cost of operation the following wil) be put into effect immediately: Garbage and household rubbish should be put in regular garbage cans and set on the curb on your regular pickup day. The rate for service will remain the same at present. Fridley Sanitation Service, Inc. . , � � . . .� . .., . .� for the storage of all refuse accumulated on the premises between collections. Each such container shall be water tight, shall have a tight fitting lid, shall be impervious to insects, rodents, vermin and absorption of moisture, shall be fire proof and shall not exceed 30 gallons in size unless approved by the Public Health Department of the City of Fridley. However, nothing herein shall be deemed to require the storage in containers of any refuse which is immediately consumed or disposed of on the premises in a multiple chamber gas fire incinerator of a type approved by the Public Health Department of the City of Fridley. 38.031. All refuse on any preinise shall be stored in the containers required by Section 33.021 hereof, except as the same may be consumed or disposed of on such premises as permitted by said section. 38.041. The containers shall be placed in the rear of the premises, or may be placed in the side yard set back if screened so as to be out of view from the steet and from ad- joining properties or in a garage located on the premises. In no event shall containers be placed next to the street or curb or be placed or maintained in such a way as to unreasonably interfere with the use of adjoining property, Containers kept outside shall be placed in such a manner as not to permit entry of or harborage for animals, insects or other vermin. 38.051. The contents of the containers sha11 be collected once every week, or more frequently if required by the pro- visions of any ot{ier ordinance of t{ie City of Fridley, by a collector licensed hereunder. He shall transfer the contents of the containers to his vehicle without spilling them, or if any spilling occurs, he shall clean it up comp�etely� Upon such collection, the containers shall be complete�y emptied and returned to the racks or stands where they are kept and the lids of the containers shall be replaced, 38.061. Whenever a container is in poor repair, is corroded or otherwise defective so as to permit insects,. vermin or rodents to enter, or does not meet any other requirements of this ordinance, the collector sf�al� notify the Public Health Sanitarian of the City of Fridley in writing on forms furnished by the Department of Health of the City of Fridley. The collector shall affix a copy of said notice to the container. The notice siiall state the deficiency and shall require repair or replacement. Upon the next collection, if the deficiency has not been corrected, the collector shall notify said Sanitarian. The Sanitarian shall then inspect said container and if found deficient, condemn the same. The collector sha11 not col1ect tf�e contents of any container marked as condemned. 38.061 STORAGE CONTAIidERS PLACING OF CONTAIPJERS RU6BISH COLLECTIGi� DEFECTIVE COiVTAI�JEP.S 107 �-' �� I y , I��SW�:�': TO "f.sA,R$A�E �C�.'�T" CE�i�'PI+.AI�T� T}�� o�nci:� �t ��x �h� �a�bag� �.ssu� l�st �►a:g�st. T�t�y ��.�x+��i ��e v�di.n�z�c� ex��ugh �ha� �eQ�� put their c�.z�s i�e�ic�� h� h��s+� izx ��Ys�v�:l�d p€�r�ie+�t o� d�iv��a�3� �t�i �,P?c�l i, ��. �� Cauneil d�,sl n�� r� ��.c�ng wit�: pu�ti�g ca�s ��ywl��r�s 'b�t�� tE�� i��as� an�. cu�b. �� un�il al.sfl t�c��C ��p�ian t�s ��e nv�ic� �ez�� t� �y ��r�ag� ��tract�rs. �� cir��i�. �� tc� �s�► i.s f.�ster£�ri�g with �he �,ndiv�.dual� a��rr�n� �ith �arla�� h�u�.��' �d if th� indiwi.rlual. do�s �� ta�r�� :� �u� t�i� b�sid� Ctx� i��us�, it i� bis argume�� ai�h his �ar�t��t��. ��1. �h� Cs�c�nei� is �l�zir��; i� �telaxing th� ordi��n�� a� ��yi:�g �h� �a�ss �a� be ptit ��ar €h� eiri�e�ay t��t th� t�aus�. ' � . �.,..z��' �.= ,��' -�� ' ,�=��- � ' �. �� j � C�t o r��lle � � ANOKA COUNTY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE P R 0 C L A M A T I 0 N 560-3450 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 WHEREAS, the Governor of Minnesota has set aside the week of January 19 - 25, 1969 to observe the founding of the Jaycees; and Wi�gEAS, in Fridley there are over 65 members, active in such areas as community development, health, safety, conservation, international relations, religious activi,ties, governmental affairs, youth in sports and mental health; and WIi�REAS, through the Jaycees, many opportunities are open for young t men between the ages of 21 and 35 to be of service to their communities while developing leadership ability; and ' WI�REAS, the citizens, civic bodies and service organizations of our community and the departments of the City Government recognize the great service rendered to this community by the Fridley Jaycees; 0 NOW THEREFORE, I, Jack 0. Kirkham, Mayor of Fridley, do hereby proclaim January 19 - 25, 1969, to be "JAYCEE WEE K" In Fridley, and encourage young men in this community interested in such service and personal development to join our local Jaycee Chapter. Dated this twentieth day of January, 1969 JACK 0. KIRKHAM, MAYOR THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 � Mayor Kirkham called the Regular Council Meeting of January 6, 1969 to order at 8:03 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Kirkham asked the audience to stand and join the Council in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. INVOCATION• A representative of the Ministerial Association gave the Invocation. ROLL CALL- MF.N�ERS PRESr.NT: Liebi, Harris, Samuelson, Sheridan, Kirkham MEI�ERS ABSENT: None ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE TO JACK O. KIRKi3AM. RE-ELECTED MAYOR, AND DAVID O. HARRI�, RE-ELECTED COUNCILMAN AT LARGE: �he Finance Director administered the Oath of Office to Jack O. Kirkham, Mayor. Mayor Y.irkham signed the Oath of Uffice and was presented with a Certificate of Election. The Finance Director then administered the Oath of Office to David O. H arris, Council- man at Large. Councilman �arris signed the Oath of Office and was presented with a Certificate of Election. The Council then congratulated Mayor Kirkham and Councilman Harris. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING ME�'TING OF DECEMBER 9, 1968• MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt the Minutes of the Special Public Hearing Meeting of December 9, 196$ as presented. Se- conded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 1968• MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of December 16, 1968 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: PAGE 2 Mayor Kirkham said that in addition to the appointments as shown in the Agenda, there are two full tim�e Firemen appointments which will need Council approval. He said that he would also lika to add Item #26: Purchase of a Snawblawer, and Plawing of Alleys, at the request of the City Manager. In addition to the communica- tions shown in the Agenda, there is a letter from the Naegele Outdoor Sign Company, and a memorandum from the City Attorney. M�TION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt the Agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. FIR�T READING OF ORDINANCE REGULATING THE ERECTION CONSTRUCTION REPAIR, ALTF�tATION. LOCATION. OR MAINTE�NANCE OF SIG'�TS AND BILL- BOARDS WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, PROVIDING FOR THE P03TING OF BONDS, THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS, INSPECTION AND FEES, PRONIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, AND REP�AL OF EXISTING C�iAPTER 56 1SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS) OF THE CITY CODE: i� , � , � ' � Councilman Harris said that he felt that the businessmen of the � community should be aware of this Ordinance, and suggested an informal hearing or sending copies of the Ordinance on to tho Chamber of Commnerce. Mayor Kirkham agreed, and said that this coa�ld ' be doaa, but that passage of the Orc�inance could still be done tonight at first reading. The City Bngineer said that three copies have been sent to the Chamber of Commerce, and that the Planning Coannission went over every item carefully. He pointed out that William Jensen is a member of the Planning Com�►ission and also of the Chsmber of Conenerce. He agreed that passage of first reading could be held tonight, then wait for comments or recoi►miendations from the Chamber of Commerce for the second reading. The City Attorney said that this Ordinance is not w ithout problems, but overall it is a good Ordinance. .� Councilnoan Harris suggested sending a cover letter with copies of tYie Ordinance to the Chamber of Commerc�, with the cover letter worded in such a way e 3 Lo invite counnents and xe comm�endations before the aecond reading. MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the Sign Ordinance on first reading, waive reading and direct the Administration to send copies of the Ordinance with a cover letter inviting the Chamber of Commerce to extend any comments they may have before the second reading, and set the �econd reading for February 3, 1969. REGUI�R COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. PAGE 3 Councilman Liebl asked about Item I. on Page 48 dealing with campaign signs, and asked why this was done. The City Attorney said that the reason was so that the City would have the assurance that these signs would be taken dawn. The City Engineer said that the Planriing Commission had had lengthy discussions on this sub- ject, and the Planning Com¢nission felt that these signs should come dvwn after an election. This would give the City the assurance that if a candidate puts up signs, he would have to take them daan again. Councilman Sheridan commented that he felt that the $25.00 deposit for putting up campaign signs was rather high. THE VOTE UPON THE MOTION, being a roll call vote, 3amuelson, Sheridan, Kirkham, Liebl, and Harris voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. MEM�ORAL�iDUM FROM LEGAL DEPARTM�.'L�TT REGARDING SERVICE FACILITIES FOR GEORGETO�WN APARTMENTS • Z'he City Engineer said that Mr. Filister had already been given the information, that permission was granted, so no other action was necessary. Councilman Liebl asked then, if Mr. Filister would still need a license. The City Attorney said that he would. MOTION by Councilmam Sh� idan to receive the co�arnunication from James Gibbs, representing the City Attorney dated December 18, 1968. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING COMMUNICATION FROM DORSh'Y, MARQUART, WINDHORST, WEST AND , HALLADAY IN REGARD TO IMPROVEMENT OF 73RD AVENUE (ONAN COMP�N'Y) AND DISCUSSION OF RESOLUTIONS REQUESTING RNOKA AND R�1M.SEY COUNTIES FOR IMPROVEMF:NT• ' � ' ' � Councilman Harris said that he had received this letter, dated December 16, 1968 regarding the upgrading of 73rd Avenue to both the east and the west. Mr. Larry Griffith, of Dorsey, Marquart, et al, said that they were very happy with the upgrading af 73rd Avenue in front of the Onan Plant and naw would like to see the rest of 73rd Avenue from East River Road to T.H. #10 upgraded. He said that he was also hope- ful of a semaphore at 73rd Avenue and T.H. #65. He said that he understood that this was de�.._:ndent on the traffic counts and pre- viously they had estimated about 750 cars from Onan, but now it would seeiu more 1 ike 90p ctars . REGULAR COUNCIL MEETTNG OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 4 Councilman Harris said that work has been in progress, and that he, the City Engineer and the City Manager had met with Anoka County, but the c9ifficulties have not been resolved as yet. He said that the possibility of extending all the way to East River Road was denied by the Public Service Commission. He said that he had asked that the Administration draw up these two res�lutions and that the City would continue to work on 73rd Avenue hetween Central and T. H. #65 with Anoka County. Mr. Griffith asked if the Council adopted these resolution$, what would be the likelihood of getting the �asterly extension. Councilman Harris said that it w�uld seem to him that the proper procedure would be for him to send a letter asking that he be given a chance to appear on their Agenda. Councilman Sheridan said that the City of Fridley has always had a good relationship with Mounds View, and he felt that the letter should go to Mounds View, rather than to t he Ramsey Caunty Com- missioners. He said that he felt that by Mounds View approaching the Ramsey County Commissioners, it would carry more weight. He also suggested reworking the resolution, so as to emphasize the benefits of a thoroughfare from T. H. #47 to T. H. #10. Councilman Harris agreed w ith Councilman Sheridan's thinking that the resolution to Ramsey County should bz re�worked. The City Engineer said that the City has already requested that Anoka County take over the stretch between Central Avenue and T.H. #65 as a County road. It is hoped that this will be done in 1969. He said that the request �or the semaphore has already been made to the Minnesota Highway Department, but there will have to be traffic counts made at that intersection before any decision will be made. He pointed out that the City also makes it's �wn traffic counts, and if the counts are up, it will help with the request. RESOLUTION #1-1969 - RESOLUTION REQUESTING ANOKA COUNTY COMMIS�IONERS TO DESIGNATE 73RD AVElv�UE AS A COUNTY ROAD AND IMPROVE IT: �i �� MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #1-19h9. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #2-1969 - A REvOLUTION TO ^��iE VILLAGE OF NiOUNDS VIEW TO REQUEST HELP T'ROM THE I2�.MSEY COUN'I'Y COMMISSIONERS 1'Q UPGRADE COUNTY ROAD H2 FROM CO;JN`i'Y' S WEST BOUNDARY LINE TO TRUNK HIGfiWAY NO. 10; —....___._.___�._ �._______._� _� MOTION by Councilman Harris to ado�t Resolution #2-1969. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vo�-�o all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared �,he motion carried unanimously. � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 5 ' RESOLL�'�'ION #3-1969 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING , REAPPOINTING �DiD C�- � FIRM?NG EXISTING APPOINTMENTS TO COMMZSSIODiS, BQAFtDS, CO1rIIKITT$E8. AND SUBCOI�lITTEES FOR THE YF.AR 1969: � � � � ' '. PI,AL�iI�iING COMMISSION (1 Year Appointment) lrl�OTION by Councilman Harris to reappoint Oliver R. Erickson as Chairman of Planning Commission for the year 1969. Second�cl by Councilman Samuelso n. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, M�yo� Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimoq,tsly. PLATS & SUBDIVISIONS - STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCO�TT (3 Year Term) MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to appoint Harry Crowder, 146 63rd Avenue N.E. to fill the vacancy of Eldon Schmedeke. 3econded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. It was agreed by the Council to consider the appointment of Daryl Nagel at the next Regular Council Meeting. BUILDING STANDARDS - DES�GN CONTROL (1 Year Tes�nt) � MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to reappoint Earl Biermann for the year 1969. Seconded by Cauncilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the m�tion carried unanimously. � � MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to reappoint Carrol K. Hauge for the year 1969. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanin�qusly. MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to reappoint William R. To�co ior ' the year 1969. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voirce vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkta m declared the motion carried un- animously. ' � ' MpTION by Councilman Liebl to appoint Larry A. Sornsen, 172 Rivers- edge Way to the vacancy created by Richard E. Dittes (Third Ward). Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. BO�RD OF APPEAL� (3 �!ear Term) MOTION by Councilman Harris to reappoint Robert Ahonen. Seconded � by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unaniawusly. � � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 6 MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to reappoint Robert A. Minisli. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, �irkham, Harris, Samuelson and Sheridan voting aye, LieUl abstaininc�, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION (3 Year Term) MOTIO�i by Councilman Sheridan to rzappoint Edward J. Fitzpatrick as Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission, thereby making him a member of the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Harris to appoint Don Blair, 206 Rice Creek Boulevard to the vacancy created by John Dunphy. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all votiny aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Harris said that he had talked to Mr. Dunphy and he has agreed to work with Mr. Don Blair for a time to familiarize him with the work of the Parks and Recreation Commission. HUMFII�T RELATIONS COMMITTEE Mayor Kirkham said that these appointments are made by the Mayor and he would ask concurrence of the Council in reappointing those presently serving; bein�t Ward 1: Jordis Mittelstadt, Ward 2: Mrs. Linda Rossman, Ward 3: Harry Crowder, and at Large: James E. Thomson and John Oden. MOTION by Councilman Liebl to concur with the appointments re- commended by Mayor Kirkham. Seconded by Councilman samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. POLICE COMMISSIOV (3 Year Term) MOTION by Councilman Harris to appoint Virgil Wills, 6841 7th Street N.E. to the vacsncy creat�d by Wilbur Whitmore. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice voi:e, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the moi:ion carried unanimously. MO`I.'ION by Councilman Sheridan to appoint Waldo W. Hoffman, 1333 Hillwind Road to the vacancy of Uavid ��i. Larson. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the moi:ion carried unanimo�.sly. � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6 1969 , PAGE 7 �� SUBURSAN RATE AU'I'HORITY ( 1 Year Term) " � � M�OTIOBT by Councilman Harris to reappoint Councilman Raymond E. ,� Sheridan. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the mota.on carried unanimously. � � � ' r � I';;'; � MOTION by Councilman Liebl to reappoint Councilman Leonard Samuel- son as Alternate. Seconded by Cauncilman Sheridan. Upon a voic e vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimous ly . NORTH SUBURBAN SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to reappoint Councilman David Harris. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. -Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unani�ously. FRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMF.NT COi�II�lISSION Eouncilman Harris requested that this be brought back at the next Regular Council Meeting at the same time that the vacancy in the Plats and Subdivisions - Streets and Utilities Subcommittee vacancy is considered as the Fridley Industrial Development Con�aission has not held their meeting which is scheduled for January 9, 1969. Councilman Samuelson requested that the Administration send letters � to all the new appointe�;s ot�tlining their duties on their various boards and commissions. He said that he felt that a letter con- firming reappointments should also be sent. � � ' ' �� MOTION by Cauncilman Harris to adopt Resolution #3-1969, and also send out awarding letters of appreciation to outgoing m�embers of boards, comnissions, etc. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #4-1969 - RESOLUTION DESIGNATING TZME AND NU1�ER OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS AND PUBLIC HEARING MEETINGS: Mayor Kirkham suggested a fourth meeting on the last Monday of the month that would be reserved for a work-shop type meeting at which to work out ideas that there is no t ime for at Regular scheduled meetings. MOTION by Coun�ilman Liebl to adopt Resolution #4-1969. Seconded by Councilman Harris. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 8 Sh 'dan comrnented that the second iaeeting of the Councilman eri month could be used as a work-shop type Meeting, if there were no Public Hearings scheduled. Councilman Harris said that he felt that the time could be changed from 5:00 to 7:30, as this �rould not put any undue burden on anyone. lrlATION by Cou ncilman Harris to change the Meeting time from 5:00 P.M. to 7:30 P.M. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, Samuelson, Sheridan and Harris voting aye, Kirkham and Liebl voting nay, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. THE VOTE upon the motion to adopt Resolution #4-1969 being a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimous ly . ��^,T,,,*,�'+�" �5-1969 - RESOLUTION DESIGNATING A LEGAL NF�TSPAPER: MOTION by Counc ilman Harris to adopt #5-1969, and designate the Fridley Sun as the City of Fridley's leq�`! newspaper. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. Shirley Behrens, Reporter for the Fridley Sun said thank you to the Council for redesignating the Fridley Sun as the legal newspaper. RESO�UTION #6-1969 - RSSOLUTION DESIGNA`t"ING AND APPOINTING A Q�RESENTATIVE FOR THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE NORTH SUBURBAN � SA.NITARY SEWER DISTRICT FOR THE YEAR 1969: MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to adopt Resolution #6-1969 and appoint Councilman David Harris as a member o�f the Board of Trustees for the North Suburban Sanitary Sewer District. Seconded by Council- man Liebl. Upon a voic e vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. �,�,�LUTION #7-].969 - RESOLtJTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY: MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #7-1969 and appoint Councilman Raymond Sheridan as Director of the Suburban Rate Authority, with Councilman Leonard Samuelson as Alternate. Se- conded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voic e vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the m.ion carried unanimously. DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORY FOR CITY FUNDS (CHARTER 7:13) MOTIOTTT by Councilman Sheridan to designate the Fridley State Bank, 6315 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota as despoitory for � the City funds. Seconded by Councilm�n Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. ' � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUA.RY 6, 1969 � � LJ � ' � , � , i ' � � ' �� J PAGE 9 CQNSZDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE REGUI.ATING THE EXCAVATING OF STREETS, AVENUES OR ALLEYS; RE4UIRING A P�2MIT THEREFOR AND PAYMENT OF A FEE; AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF ITS PROVISIONS: Councilman Harris asked if this had been reviewed by the Adminis- ration and legal staff. Z'he City Attorney said that he had looked it over, and is not sure whom it is aimed at, as all the utility companies and plumbers are excluded. If anyone were to want to do any excavating, they would have to post a$100,000 bond and pro- vide insurance of $100,000 for one person and $300,000 for any one accident and property damage. He said that it would seem that it must be aimed at private property awners doing their own excavating. The City Engineer said that this is no problem. He said that the Minneapolis Gas Company has been wanting to get this passed as t2zey do not want anyone to dig up the streets. Councilman Harris pointed out that if a$100,000 performance bond is required, it would be cheaper to pay the fine. The City Attorney said that he did not understand who is causing the problem. He said that he did not know if u�nauthorized people were digging in the streets naw. He wondered haw this would affect the home contractors. Councilman Samuelson said that this would place a burden on the sewer and water contractors. He said that tYiere is seldom a reason to break up a street. �he City Attorney pointed out that plumbers are exempted. Councilman Samuelson said that he felt that the utility companies should not be exempted, as they are the ones that do the excavating. Mr. Charles Cawan of the Minneapolis Gas Company, said that he is acting as laison man between the various municipalities and the Gas Company. He said that this Ordinance was drawn up by Engin- eers for the League of Municipalities, 3nd it took about l� years to formulate the finished Ordinance. He said that a great number of municipalities have already adopted this Ordinance. He ex- plained that by having a uniform excavating Ordinance it would be similar to•the Uniform Building Code used everywhere. He pointed out that all the work must be done to the satisfaction of the Engineer. He said another advantage would be 24 hour notice be- fore any interuption in service and also that the compaction is spelled out in detail. Councilman Samuel�on said that he still felt that the utility companies should be included and be required to get a permit. Mr. Cawan said that the Gas Company tries very hard to make good patches and to auger under driveways, and he is asking only that everyone else also conform to their standards. Mayor Kirkham commented that he could see the benefits of havirig a uniform,excavating Ordinance, but thathe would like to have this brought back a� a later date to give the Council more time for thought on this. Mr. Co�wan said that t.his ordinance is for the REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 10 protection of the general public. The City Attorney questioned whether the amount of surety bond and insurance had to be that high. Mr. Cawan said that he had nothing to do with setting the figures. �he City Attorney said that the figures may be reasonable if a company does a great deal of excavating from time to time, b�t for a one occasion, it would be very burdensome. Councilman Liebl said that there was a case lasy year where a car fell into a hole, and sued, and asked if this would be covered. Mr. Cawan said that he was not familiar with the situation, but would assume so. Mr. Richard Harris asked if a developer were to go in and develop 4o acres and put in streets and alleys etc. would this mean that he would have to post a performance bond and provide the required insurance. Mr. Cawan pointed out that this was not his Ordinance, but was just presenting it for consideration. Councilman Harris said that he would assume the contractor would be required to have the bond and insurance, according to the Ordinance. MOTION by Councilman Liebl to table this Ordinance until February 3, 1969, and in the interim ask the Planning Cormnission to review it, and make comments. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DECISION__CONCERNING gaWARD DUMPHY REQUEST: Mr. Hvward Dumphy appeared befo�e the Council and said that the Planning Commission had approved of the additional portion of his P.D. District, but that the Council had denied it. He said that he is appearing tonight to shvw how the additional land could be incorporated into the district, and pointed out that the land pro- vides for more recreational area. Iie said that he felt that this was the best use of the land. He said that at the onset, an apartment house was planned as presented by Mr. Schroeder and was included in the booklet the Planning Conunission and Council re- ceived shawing 108 units. He said that it was found at the onset that the tawn house type development was not feasible. Councilman Liebl said that under the original proposal the nomenclature used by Mr. Schroeder was town houses, to which the people were not apposed. Mr. Dumphy said that the land has laid dormant for years, and he felt that this was the best use of the land. Councilman Sheridan asked Mr. Dumphy if he has tried to get to- gether with the people in the area. He said that he understood that � ' C � �� LJ � ' � � � �� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF II JANUAI�Y 6, 1969 PAGE 11 the people were not mad at Mr. Dumphy, but at the Council, and that he felt that Mr. Dumphy should have made an attampt to reach the people to explain his plans. He said that Mr. Dumrphy has already spent about $10,000 i.n developing his plans, and that he realized that the corner lots are difficult to utilize.� 1'his zoning has been approved with thei exception of the two small portions he wanted to add. Councilman Liebl asked if the people have seen the plar�s. Mr. Dumphy said that most of the people were in agreem�ent at the onset of the proposal. Councilman Sheridan pointed out that that was when Mr . Schroeder was tallcing abaut tvwn houses . Mr . Dumphy said that the original plans shawed area plans for multiple residences under Mr. Schroeder's proposal. Councilman Sheridan said that he did not recall when the apartment complex nomenclature started being used instead of town houses. Councilman Sarmuelson poir►ted out that the people were complaining about traffic problems, and explained that on the original proposal all of the traffic would have to go up past the apartments, but with the new proposal only about 50�6 of it would. Councilman Harris asked if he was atill planning the shopping center. Mr. Dumphy said yes, that there was no objection to this. He said that this would include various small shops such as a beauty shop, grocery store, barber shop, small office buildings etc. Councilman Harris asked about the traffic on East River Road and if there was any discussion relative to looping back into the lots at the north. Mr. Dumphy said that 24' of this street will go foY'a new lane for traffic control. Councilman Sheridan asked if he was the fee owner. Mr. Dumphy went to the map and shvwed the areas on the map. He said that a portion of his building was on a portion of land not yet zoned for P.D. but could be cut out if necessary. He said that he would like all the extra lots included into the P.D. District for ease in description. Councilman Samuelson said that his request for the additional � rezoning has already beer deniea, so what was the next step. Council- man Liebl said that he felt that if Mr. Dumphy wants to get this completed, he should meet with these people and their lawyer, arrc7 possibly a new Public Hearing may have to be held. Z'he City Attorney said that Mr. Dumphy had the right to ask the Cour�cil to reconsider. If still denied he could continue his plans on that portion al- �� ready zoned P.D. If he chose to drop it, it would revert to the original zoning, but he would still have the right to develop his 1 land. Councilman Liebl said that he felt that the crux of the matter was that the people felt that they wer� let dawn as they were lead to believe that it was to be tvwn houses, then learned too late that REGUI,A,R COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 12 it was an apartment house. Mr. Dumphy said that the original plans shaw an apartment complex of 108 units, and that this has not changed a great deal. The City Attorney said that one pr ocedural aspect would be if one of the Councilmen who voted against the rezoning were to call for a revote, this could be considered again. Councilman Sheridan said that he was one of the Councilmen who voted against it. He said that Mr. Schroeder made the presentation in Mr. Dumphy's behalf and he said that it was a shame that the terminology used was tawn houses rather than apartments. He pointed out that Mr. Schroeder never gave any indication he was representing Mr. Dumphy . Mr. that fel Dumphy shawed the audience the original plan of Mr. Schroeder's included an apartment house. He said that this new plan he t was a much better thought out plan. Mr. Curtis Walberg, 265 Ely Street said that he had never seen tlle plan, but Mr. Schroeder mentioned tawn houses. He said that no mention of the number of units was ever made. Mr. Dumphy said that he did not come to the meetings then, as these plans were shown at that meeting. If he would have come, he would have had full knawledge of what was being proposed. Councilman Samuelson asked Mr. Walberg if he felt that the Council had deceived him. Mr. Walberg replied no. Mr. Jerry Potts, 8066 Ruth Street, said that he had voiced an objection before, and has not had a chan�e of heart. He said that there were still the landscaping problems, traffic, and the apart- ment house rather than the tawn houses. He said that he bought his house from Mr. Schroeder and he felt that Mr. Schroeder was unfair to him and was not honest with him, as he gave him no indication that the zoning in th is area was going to change. He said that he did take the precaution before purchasing his house of checking a zoning map, but of course he would ha��e no way of knawing what was being proposed unless Mr. Schroeder told him. Mr. Bourdeaux, 440 Hugo Street said that in his opinion Mr. Schroeder took ad- vantage of Mr. Potts. Mr. Potts said that this is not a case of a few people being against this, that there was a rather large petition against it. Councilman Samuelson explained that the developer has to come before the Council again for final approval of plans. Mr. Potts said that the zoning maps shaw comm�ercial lots, but not those abutting the creek. The City Engineer agreed that these are R-1 lots. Mr. Potts commented that he would like to keep it that way. ' ' � ' ' ' ' . � ' � � � REGUI,AR COUNCIL MEETING OF JAI�TIJAPtY 6, 1969 PAGE 13 Councilman Liebl asked if most o� the lots were not zoned K-1 ' before the P.D. District zoning.�� The City Engineer said yes. Councilman Liebl said that the C�uncil feels that th� land should be used to it's highest use also� but he felt that the Council was deceived also about the 108 unit��iapartment co�lex. Mr. Dumphy said that the Council was not de�eived and that the orig.inal plans show 108 units. Councilman Liebll said that the Council must con- sider the people's wishes and suc�gested that Mr. Dumphy talk with the people and their attorney to!see if a compromise could not be worked out. Mr. Ralph Officer, 315 Hugo Street, said that he had attended most of the meetings of the Planning Comanission and the wording at that time was tawn houses. He said that he did not think that the word "town howse" ever reached the City Council level at that time. He said that he felt that the people gradually lost interest as they were not opposed to the tawn houses. He said th�t he had no ax to grind with Mr. Dumphy. He said that he was not sure whether he is for or against th�s development, and agreed that he would like to meet, and go over the plans. Mr. Robert Venne, 200 Hugo Street, said that Howard Dumphy owned other land in the area and wondered if ha could use this land as additional parking area. He said that he felt that there should be limits as to haw much could be added onto a P.D. District. The City Attorney said that land zoned R-1 within 500' of a com- mercial zoning could be used as a parking lot with a special use permit. Mr. Dumphy pointed out that the creek provides a natural boundary between the R-1 District to the north and the P.D. District. He said that the land he awns east of the P.D. District naw zoned R-1 would be used for residential. The City Attorney asked Mr. Dumphy if he would be willing to provide a protective covenant to that effect. Mr. Dumphy replied he would. He added that a lot of time and money has gone into t��s project so far and he is willing to donate land for extra width on East River Road and for sidewalks. Councilman Sheridan said that before this Council is the recon- � sideration of the vote on the addition to the P.D. District. He said he had voted against it before, so it is his prerogative to bring it back, but he did not choose to bring it back for Council � consideration. Mayor Kirkham said that he would encourage Haward Dumphy to taeet ' with the residents. He felt that Mr. Dun�hy has acted in good faith in his efforts. He sai� that he wo�d also have to agree � REGUI,AR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 14 - with Councilman Liebl that the Citizen's rights must be considered. Councilman iiarris suygested making the Conanunity Room in the City Hall available for a meeting. The residents in the audience agreed to this. It was agreed that Mr. Dumphy would send out notices to all the people within 300' which he could get from the Engineering Department, and also to those people whol.signecl the pefiition against the rezoninq, even though they were more than 300' away. It was agreed to set the meeting for January 29, 1969 (Wednesday) at 7:30 in the Community Room. RECESS- �� Mayor Kirkham called a recess at 10:15 at which time the Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission and their Consultant adjourned to the conference room to study the plans for West Moore Lake and Riverview Heights. �� 4s _ �11� • t : • � � • - u • � s �+yi:��i; M4TION by Councilman Harris to receive the Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of December 18, 1968. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declarecl the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION MEETING OF DECEI�ER 16, 1968: MpTION by Councilman Harris to receive the Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Com�aissiw� Meeting of the 16th of December, 1968. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING BIDS ON PUBLIC OUTDOOR WARNING SIRENS ,AI4D INSTALLATION: Equipment Only Morgan Fire Equipment•Co. Madison, Wisconsin Base Bid $17,934.00 Alternate B id $18,780.00 Minn. Fire Equipment Co. $19,536.00 Alternate #l: $20,160.00 2476 University Ave. �lternate #2: $11,739.00 St. Paul, Minn. i � ' ' ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEE'I'ING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 15 Federal Sign � Installation Onlv & Sicrz�al B. & N. B.& N. Alternate Lehn Electric $12,700.00 $10,920.00 $9,983.00 Anoka, Minnesota � Bacon Electric $ 9,000.00', $ 7,500.00 Fridley, Minnesota , MOTION by Councilman Harris to concur with the Director of Civil Defense that the law bid combinat'ion appears to be the bid of Morgan Fire Equipment Co., and Bacon Electric, in the amount of , $25,434.00, and that the bid award be held up pending receipt of Federal and State funds. Bid award is to be brought back to t he Council for official award when confirmation of State and Fecleral � funds is received. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all vc�ting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. ' CONSIDERATION OF RELEASING TAX DELIN UF�i''P L(�r RE UEST BY ! KF�tETH S_ (Lot 30, Block 11, Hyde,park Addition) � � The City Engineer said that this item is going before the Planning Commission at their meeting on January 8, 1969, so they will have information and a recommendation for the Council. MOTYON by Councilman Harris to deny the request until the street ' patterns and layouts are established in Hyde Park. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirk- ham declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF FIRE DEPARTMENT PAYROLL: M�OTION by Councilman Sheridan to approve payment of the Fire Department Payroll. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, May�r Kirkham declared the taotion carried unanimously. RESO O �-1969 - RESOLUT ON TO ADVERTISE FOR B DS FOR ONE N$W REAFt MOUNTED TRUCK CRA,NE • MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Resolution #8-1969. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor I�irkham declared the motion carried unanimously. The City Manager said that this was a budgeted item and funds were established for this p;xrchase, which was estimated.at about $2500. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 16 RESOLUZZ ON #9-1969 - RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR THREE POLICE CA,RS • MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Resolution #9-1969. secoaded by Councilman Harris for discussion. Councilman Harris said that he understood that these cars were to be air conditioned. The Chief of Police drew Councilman Harris' attention to Page 2 of the specifications, Item #3 which does provide for air conditioning. THE VOTE upon the motion being a voice vote, all votiny aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #10-1969 - RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF A NEW NSETROPOLITAN ZOO• MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Resolution ##10-1969. 'I'he motion was seconded and upon a voice vote, Samuelson, Kirkham, Liebl and Harris voting aye, Sheridan abstaining, Mayor Kirkham decl.ared the motion carried. APPOINTMENTS • Name Nikki J. Finck 5201 3rd Street Fridley, Minn. John Brazil 5529 6th Street N.E. Fridley, Minn. Donald J. Lee 596 63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota Thomas J. Sauer 5353 4th Street N.E. Fridley, Minn. Lester B. Russell 2827 133rd Ave. N.W. Coon Rapids, Minn. Position Salar Rep.lacss Clerk-Typist $340.00 Bonnie Weschler Police DiSpatcher $575.00 New Position (Non-Uniformed) Poiice Dispatcher $575.00 (Non-Uniformed) l��iice Dispatcher $575.00 (Non-Uniformed) Polic:e Dispatcher $575.00 (Non-Uniformed) New Position New Position New Position , , ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 Name Position Sa� Deruiis M. Ottam , 140 Rickard Road Fridley, Minn. � Haward Simonson 801 Overton Drive Fridley, Minn. Fire Fighter Fire Fighter PAGB 17 Replaces $656.00 New Position $656.00 Neiw Position MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve of the foregoing appointments. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Uppn a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion'carried..unanimously. Councilman Samuelson asked while talking about new appointments, how the instructions of the new Policia Dispatchers was being handled. The City Manager said that the regular Policemen work with them until they are fully aware of all the requirements of their job. PETITION #35-1968 - STREET PAVING'FOR IANGFELLOW STREET: MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive Petition #35-1968 and in- clude in the 1969 program. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CLAIMS• N�OTION by Councilman Harris to approve payment of General Claims #16906 through #17078 and Liquor Claims #2873 through #2901. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. ,Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. LICF�iSES • MOTION by Councilman Liebl to approve the following licenses: CIGARETTE LICENSE BY APPRWED BY ' Minnie Pearl's Chicken NEW David C. Somiher Chief of Police David C. Som�er 5865 University Avenue ' Fridley, Minnesota ' r REGUTAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PUBLIC DRINKING PLACE Club 47 6061 University Ave. Fridl ey, Minnesota CAFE Club 47 6061 Univeristy Ave. Fridley, Minnesota GAS SERVICE Economy Gas Installers, � � PAGE �8 BY APPROVED BY B illy Don Harpole Chief of Police Health Inspector Billy Don Harpole G`hief of Police • Health Inspector Inc. NEW Edward Toohey Plumbing Inspector 3623 Lyndale Ave. So. Minneapolis, Minn. The motion to approve the licenses was seconded and upon a voica vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. pURCHASE OF SNOiW BLOWERL__AND PLOWING OF ALLEYS: The City Manager said that the great amount of snow that has fallen this year has created quite a problem and he felt that a much better job of snaw removal could be accomplished by the pur- chase of a snaw blvwer, which could be mounted onto a Case W-7 End Loader. He said that this cauld also be used to blvw the snow from the sidewalks along the schools where space was adequate. Another advantage would be thak the snaw could be blown into vacant areas whenever possib.le, so that it would not pile up so high along the side of the r.oad and make vision at intersections very hazardous. He said that this bla�pr could be used at the intersections to blaw the sna�a into tru4ks and haul the snaw away. He said that the estimated cost would be about $3500 and he felt that it would fall w ithin the budget, but if not, at the end of the year, it cauld come from emergency funds. Councilman Samuelson agreed and commented that they wanted to make sure that they did not g�� one that did not have enough pvwer. Councilman Harris agreed and felt that at the first available opportunity, that the City should trade in the V plaw. Mayor ICirkham agreed that the V Plvw should be gotten rid of when pos- siblE�, and also that he thought that the idea of the snaw blawer would be a great help. The Counc�l ur.animously agreed that the purchase of the snaw blvwer would�be a good investment. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 19 Z'he City Manager then brought up the question of whether the alleys should be plowed after the street work is done. He said that he realizecl that the City does not plow alleys unless they are im- proved, but this does create a hardship on many people. T'he Council agreed that after all the street work is done, that the alleys could be opened up. Councilman Samuelson asked tha City Engineer haw many motor graders the City had. He replied one. COMMUNICATIONS- n A. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF'ECONOMIO�DEVLLOPMENT: BROCC,EiURE MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the communication fraa the State of Minnesota, Department of Econou►ic Development dated November 6, 1968. Z*he motion was seconded and upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried un- anitaously . B. MILLER FUNERAL HOME: TIME EXTENSION FOR PAVING PARKING LOT MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the communication from the Miller Funeral Home dated December 9, 1968 and grant permission for a time extension for the completion of the parking area behind the new Moore Lake Funeral Home until June 30, 1969 as per letter. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. � C. NAEGELE OUTDOOR SIGN COMPAI�TY: REMOVAL OF TREE Councilman Harris said that there is a tree which will obscure the "Welcome to Fridley" sign in the west right of way of East River r Road at the south end of tawn. , , ' �� ' � M4TION by Councilman Harris to receive the letter from the Naegele Outdoor Sign Company dated December 27, 1968 and request the Administration to direct a letter to An�ka County asking them aremove the tree, and replace with foliage if they desire. Se- conded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. l� aye, D. MEMiORANDUM FROM CITY ATTOTcNEY: LOTS 8& 9, BLOCK 6, CITY VIEW ADDITIG�� The City Attorney said that the cost of $5,800.00 plus $669.96 is quite high, but that the Council must also consider that the cost of condemnation is high. Councilman Harris said that he felt that the price is high also but that the City needs that property. REGUI,AR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 6, 1969 PAGE 20 M�OTION by Cauncilman Harris to ask the City Attorney to try to neqotiate the price dawn once more. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham dec2ared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Liebl com�uented that even if the price carinot be laiwerecl, he felt that the City should purchase it, as it is badly needec]. �rocr�r : MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to adjourn the Meeting. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Rirkham declared the Regular Council Meeting of January 6, 1969 adjourned at 11:15 P.M. Res ctfully submitted, '��2'`-' i��/ Juel Mercer Secretary to the Council Jack O. Kirkham May ar � PAGE 2 ]. �PE�� P[TBLIC gIEARING MEETII�TG OF JANU��'' 13 , 1969 Maxpr Harris Pro tem called the Special ��1�� i�g �e��q og Jani�ary 13, 1969 to order at 8:05 P.M. PI,�E�1GrE OF�,�A�,LEGIANCE• May�x Ha,x�ris pro tem requested the audience to stand and join the �QU}�ci,l in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROT�,�, CALL: �MBERS PRESENT: �s�xs Ass�r - AI)O�TTON,�,�,OF _AGENDA - Liebl, Harris, Samuelson Kirkham, She�idan � M�yp� Harris Pro tem said that there was one additional item he wau�.d li.ke to add: Item 6A: A request for assistance from the g�,r�aas�e haulers to the residents to place their garbage cans near the dra,veway during the snaw emergencies. ' M�T�ON by Councilman Liebl to aclopt the Aga�da as amended. Se- can�ed by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Maxpr Ha�:ris Pro tem declared the motion carried. FLiBLTC HEARING ON STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #89• MayQr �arris Pro tem read the Pub],ic Hearing �iotice to the audience. �he City Engineer explained that the reason for this project is that the ar�a at the west end of Norton Avenue and north of the rai�.road t�acks gets flooded after heavy rains. To alleviate this prpbl�m, the proposal is to update the size of the culvert running undea� the railroad tracks. He explained that the total cost of the p�c� j ect is about $ 30 , 5;. 0.00 , but some of the cost will be borne ?ay �pr�,ng Lake Park as some of their water drains into this area +�r�d 2Q�� of the cost will be borne by Minnesota Transfer Railway �Qm�any, �ie then showed the area on the �creen for the benefit of �� au�i,�ence, May�� Harris Pro tem called for comn►ents for or against the project. A v�.�itor t�o the Meeting said that'she lives at the end of Norton AY��nuQ arld after the last flood her house had some damage, in- clu,d�i�g ruining her carpets, without restitution. She said that the �j�Af��,�, PU$LIC �iEARING MEETING OF JANUARY 13 , 1969 PAGE 22 ''' � ,p�W� �a�rstad Company's tanks were floating in the water. She ��,�c� ��at she wanfed to speak in favor of the improvement. �y,�Q� �ar�'�.� Pro tem asked if anyone else wishAd to be heard. �� Was� �no response. ��O�T by Councilman Samuelson to close the Public Hearing on St�xn S�wE� Project #89. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a vpi�e vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motian carried. �,iJBy�I......0 HF�,,,ARING ON STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #80: Ma�or Haxris Pro tem read the Public Hearing Notice to the audience, ar�d asked the City Engineer to explain the project. T'h� Ci�y E��ineer shawed a map shawing this proposed project in relation to the storm se�wer projects adjacent to it. He said tha.t the storm sewer systems in the lawer part of the City have been upg�aded and the cost has for the most part been equalized at a cos�k of between $3.00 to $3.22 per 100 square feet. He said that thi.s is a very large storm sewer area and shawed the b oundaries on the �creen for the benefit of the audience. He said that the �ta�rm sewer would run along 7th Street, then 68th Avenue and into Ricp Creek, with an extension into washington Street to pick up fih� ir�tersection of 68th Avenue and Washir:gton Street. He said tha�� h is would give this area the same type of facility as in othex' parts of the City and wauld be up to City standards. Mr, Comstock elaborated that the boundaries were determined by oth�r storm se�wers in the area. At the south and west end of the p�rp,�ect, it abutts another storm sewer district i.e. Storm Sewer Proj�3ct #� which was put in in 1955 or 1956. At the north, Rice Cre�k £orms the natural boundary. On the east and north side, the�ce is another storm se�wer system. He explained that in the R�.ce Creek Plats, the developer put in storm sewers, but they have b�efi� proven inadequate. In 1962, the Council was petitioned to s�'�dy thi.s area because of the drainage problems. Studies were m�de at that time, then in 1966 another Public Hearing was held, bu�. the �eople did not want the storm sewer. He said that the �r3,teri�a used is based on a 5 year frequency. This means that if thelre i� a f�.00d once in 5 years, the storm se�wer is considered in�dequate. When Mississippi Streeet was put in, an agreement was eT��exed into with Anoka County whereby they would put in the pipes under ,Mississippi Street, with the idea that eventually the s�O�'m sewer in the entire area would have to be upgraded. This �tqrnc► sewez system proposed ur.�er storm Se�wer #80 has been designed by �camstoc'k and Davis and revie�wed by the Anoka County Highway � � � ' � � , ' , ' , ' � SP�CIAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JANUARY 13, 1969 Department and the Minnesota Highway Department Engineers. PAGE 23 Ma�pr Harris Pro tem read the memoranduiu from the Finance Director frAm the Freliminary Assessment Roll to explain th� metl�od of ca7.�ulatiqn of as�sessments, which Qxplained that �h,e people who have already paid for storm sewer assessments for storm sewers put in j�y #�,he developer would get a credit. Z{h� F�,nar►ce Directo� sa�i;d! ��,�t s�orm sewer assessments are generally spread over 20 years�at'6;6 interest, and would be levied in 1970. He sxplained that if a lot size was 10,000 square feet, the assessment would be about $330.00 and that credit would be given where due. �'h� City �ngineer said that the City Council has es�ablished a policy of getting all the storm s,ewers in the City completed, and equ�lizing payment as was done with the south end of Fridley. 7,'hi� Same thing is being proposed' with Project #80 at a rate of about $3.30 less credit due. Thi,s would approximately equal the rate of others paying in other parts of the City. Mayor Harri�s Pro tem explained that each year the City receives pet�.tions for improvement of streets. A number of streets petit- ioned for are in Project #80. Th�ese people have been told that the City �annot put in permanent streets unless the storm sewers are put in first as the streets will not last, and they may have to be torn up later to put the storm sewer down. MayQr Harz�.s Pro tem then called for comments from the audience. Mr. M.C. Achterkirch, 612 Rice Creek Terrace, said that he would 1i.1se to see what this project includes. The City Engineer put the map on the screen for him shawing the boundaries of the district. �Mayor Harris Pro tem said that some of these streets have been �:peta.tioned for. The City Engineer then shawed Mr. Achterkirch just what streets had been petitioned for on the screen. Mr. Ackter- kirch asked why the entire area is included then. The City ��g,i�e�er said that the mains would have to go through this area to get to Rice Creek. Mayor Harris Pro tem pointed out that at the street hearing, this Public Hearing was asked for as these people want their streets completed. Mr. Achterkirch asked if there was a petition for the storm sewer. Mayor Harris Pro tem said no, that the storm sewer woulc� r� ordered in by the Counci�., if they saw that it was a necessity. Mr. John L. Markfelder, 613 Rice Creek Terrace, said that most of tbe peop�.e here tonight were here in 1966 when they did not want it. pi��;� FU8��4 ��R�NG Q�" �7'ANUARY 13 , 1969 �� s�t��t�a��d i� the methods of procuring khe �� gp,��t�� pt�t �ha�fi� �.t is the sam� Consultant ��.s� th4t 'h� '.l�new of only one family north of �� y,r�x� �,r� �avcar oE �his improvement . PAGE 24 studies m�� be wtong, as i.n 1966. He Mississippi Street ,p�x�. Fau�, Y�a+�, ��'� Ri�e Creek Terrace, sai.d tha�k he lives on the �x�(�k ��d ��l�Gt�d � p�eC� o� property wh�.ch had goc�cl draina�e and �h�� h� ��1t t1�at ar� additiona�. assessment would be unjust, Tf �1�+� p�p��.e �.� the central portion of Fridley chose a piece of ��ppq��y fi'�a� was law-lying, tha�, was their choice and he did not W�� t�r fQr their erroxs in ,�udgment, and that this was the �� '�qy �.00"�. He said that he could not see haw this pro j ect c�quld ��r��i� him and quest�.oned the wisdom af runr►a,ng tY�e water in�Q Rice Creek. i3e said tha� �he las� time Rice Creek was dananed �,P � h� �.oat 4 tr�es . �+�i,a,yo� #�axx�.� Pro tem a�ked i� all the water did not go into Rice Cx+�61� �nyhaw� The City Engineer said yes, eventually. He said �h�t +�y�ypn� eventually will be in one storm sewer d�strict or a�,Q��x ��d �� this is inevitable as the City co�ntinu�s to graw. �x. ��A. :iwQrsky, �9], 61st Ayenue N.E. said that he la.ves on the �pxt.�p�� ca�ner of 61st Avenue and 7th Street and he �ailed to see '�gry� �,�,��g ��Q j�� would be,nefit him. Mr. Comstoclt said that even- fi��,�,y fihe� ��orm sewer would be going north. At the present t�me �'�� tw� eatch bas�.ns on the corner which pick up the drain� �gp �d +��r� �.� onto private property. �q, y�,�i'�Q� �o the Meeting said that he did not see why the people �� qt�tM �+nc� should help the people a,n the R�.c� Cre�k Pla�s�. �. �om�'�ack �aid that if k�e was not assessed under Storm Sewer #5, �q wpu�,c� ia� �ss�;s�ed under this one. �* �p�� .�]�, 4�i5 Rice Cre�k Terrace said that he was at th� last ��t,��c� �'bc�ut t]r�is. He questianed the legality of storirig wate� q� �q�x��.��, �r�ivate property, and would they be assessed. MayoX ��x�,� k��o te,�n said that the law states that anyone within a dis� ��.�� pa�s t'�� same rate in any given storm sewer district. ,�. �� p��r�r, 377 66t� Avenue N.E. said that he has lived in '�'h� C�'�y c?� �'�'id�.ey 13 year�. He said �hat t,he developerS oF Ch�'��'�� A�di��.o� put �n stcarm sewers, i�e said tk�a►t lne t�ad �a1- qt��.�� a�ses�sment on ��.s lot and it would come to $550, and �� wa�k�a� i� �+�ing d��a��d tQ the c��k a�.ready . M�; . Coms�toc)� �,��,A �� „��, �k�� w�� W�ich ends up as ��ac� w�,ter, par� Q�' a.� ��.�,� �,�a �1�t� R�Q�l��. Pro�ae�ty area. I� a h�aYy rain �a11s �hsre is �aQn��,�c� �,s �.h� conduit is not big enough, lau� even�ually the runo£� � ' ' ' ' ' ' � � �i,li.� , � ' ' � ' �� ' ' �PECIAL PUBLZC I�EARING MEETING OF JANUARY 13, 1969 PAGE 25 goes �o RiCe Creek. He said that the existing main would augment th� new on�, so the two pipes would actually act as one. Mr. T�ayer said that he did not object to the storm sewer at first, but he cannot see where his propelrty would be benefitted $550 worth. Mr. Comstock commented that it could be proven in a court of law the necessity of th is storm sewer system. A Visitor to the Meeting asked who owns the Riedel property now. She also asked if these were exac,t boundaries. Mayor Harris Pro tem answered that these were approximate boundaries drawn for the preliminary hearing. She said that it seemed to her that the Riedel property awners would bene,fit most. Mr. Robert McPherson, S00 Bennett'Drive N.E. said that there are mar�Y�oles at thQ intersection of Benriett Drive and 7th Street, but thex do no good as they stick up too high, so there is still flooding. If they were lawered, the water could run into them. Mr. A. Miller, 525 Bennett Drive agreed with Mr. McPherson and �aid �hat he had complained about this many years ago. Mr. L1oyd Seruiethum, 369 66th Avenue N.E. said that there is a storm sew�:r at 66th Avenue and University Avenue Service Road that was put tlzere when University Avenue was revamped. He said that he could not understand hav they could benefit on 7th.Street, when the water runs the other way. He said that the water is taken care of naw since the County did some work. Mr. G.G. Ingaldson, 6777 7th Street N.E. asked where all the drainage problems are. Mr. Comstock said that he had done no work on this since 1966, but at that time there were some families having �l,00ding problems on Rice Creek Terrace. Mr. Ingaldson said that i.fi seemed strange that this should be brought up naw, when no one in the area was aware that they we�ce having probletas. The City Engineer said that the water is being ponded on private pro- pexties and this is the reason thQ people are not having more trouble than they have naw. Mr.'ingaldson said that he understood St the last Meeting held on this problem, that a drainage area Cou�.d be created at eonsiderable Less cost but the reason this is �ot b�ing aon�idered is that the Council does not know how the Riedel property will be developed,, and that there could be high tax revenu�s from this property if developed to a higher use. MaXor Harris Pro tem ac�reed that there were alternates, but they wpu�d er�tail the City purchasing a portion of th e Riedel property �or a retainage bas�n. He pointed out that the high cost of this pxopex�tx could make the project ex�ceed the cost oi' improvement witlz4ut the ponding area and going, directly to the creek. I�e said tk'�at �the cost of condenG.,ation of a: portion• of the Riedel property gp�;CI,A�', pLTBx,,IC HEARING MEETING OF JANUARY 13 , 1969 PAGE 26 ,�� an in.tangible amount. He said that the alternate proposal was $1$O,OQO, but did not include the condemnation �osts on the R�.edel propert,y • �fr. Comstock said that there were three proposals possible. First the one befQre the people now, with no ponding on the Riedel pro- perty, t;hes �eQQnd with a ponding area of about 5 acres which would be 'a,bout $155,OQ0. 'lrhe thi�d p�oposal was a ponding area of about 10 acres which would be about $174,000. He added that these figures are from the year 1966 and since then the cost of labor and materials and lan� has gone up. It was estim,ated that the cost of the land i,n 19fi6 would be about $50 , 000 for 10 acres . Councilman Liebl said that the Council is fully aware of the alter- nates. He said that this area did not develop in ar� orderly manner, and that this district should have been started with forethought, but it is too late for that naw. He said that he felt that it would be µnwise for the City to have 5 acres in the central part of the City used as a dumping ground and that this would not be in the best interests of the City, or the people to create a dumping y�ound. He said that the cost of the project is not goin9 to get any cheaper, and the reason the Council asked Comstock and Davis, is that they had done the work before, and it would be wasteful to ask them to coinpile a new report and spend a lot of money on this preliminary report until the Council had an idea if the people were to be receptive to this idea or not. He said that he must be honest and say that he felt that the dumping area in the �aaio of our Ci.ty would not be to anyone's advantage, but that the Council must find some answer to this problem as it will get worse instead o� better. Mr. Ingaldson said that he felt that any alternate plans ahould be made public. If these alternate plans are not felt to be feasible by the Council,the public shauld knaw this too. Mr. Merle Jordahl, 575 67th Avenue N.E., said that when street construction was started in ,front of his home, storm sewer pipes aXrived, and ha did not knc�w tl�at there were going to be any �tortp sewer pipes laid. He felt that an overall view of the pro- b�.em w.ould have to be taken and educate the people . He com�nented that it seemed that most of the streets could be put in on 68th �1,venue and 7th Street without the whole storm sewer system. T'he City Engineer said that there was a portion o f 68th Avenue and 7th Street that could not be done and this was pointed out at the street Public Hearing. Mx�. Jsahn Gabrielson, 656 63rd Avenue N.E. said that Fx�'P�=�Y �as always been a duck pond, and still is. 'h,e has saen no remarkable �hange in water levels. ney sai.d that the property was awned by E� Riedel the Riedel He said that The City Attor- who has died, ' SP�� PUB�TC HEARING MEETING QF JANUARY 13 196 , 9 ' PAGE 27 and the land is in probate, He said that he assumed that the Children wpu�d be the awners. The City of Fridley is outletting water onto �h��r land and he said that he had had a call from the R�� estate's �ttorney saying that they�were going to bring suit �gainst the City of Fridley for ponding on their property. He told �he attoxneX that in that case the City would have to go ahead w��h �he�r proposed storm sewer proposal, in which case that pro- party would be heavily assessed.'' xe said that the City will be f��ced to �ondemn some land for a retainage basin for the excess water eventually if this is the way out ihat is chosen. Mr. Richard Kemper, 6736 7th Street N.E, said that h� had signed a petition to curb and surface 67'th Avenue. He said that as the City �as a 10 year street improvement program, he felt that they �m�.ght �s well get it done, before'the costs go even higher. He sa�d tY�at the petition was accepted, but put off because of the por�ion af storm sewer needed. H±e said he would just as soon put it i,n now,when.thinking of the costs 10 years from naw. He asked when this drainage district first started taking shape. Mr. Com- stock said that it started when the first storm sewer district was put in i,n �.954 or 1955. He said that this was before his firm started working for the City. He'said that Comstock arid Davis started working for the City in 1959. He said that the first t�sk was to outline the storm sewer drainage districts. He said that there was not enough money to do a complete topoc;raphic sur- vey, so some was done by street grades and some was done be aerial topography. The boundary to the southwest was established by the baundard of Storm Se�er Project #5. The northern boundary was a na�uxal bou�dary beinr Rice Creek. Some of the problems now are caused by the developers of the Rice Creek Terrace Plats not put�.ing in large enough storm se�wers. Mr. Kemper said that it loQked to him like Mississippi Street would be a boundary. iyz. Comstock replied that some areas south oF Mississippi Street x�un i.�nto Itice Creek, but the problem here is that the pipes are too sm�ll to carry off all the water, hence the ponding on the Riedel propexty. Mr. Kemper said that then it appears that this storm s�wer district was set up without an actual survey. Mr. Comstock Said that �.h is is correct, as other storm sewer districts abut '�2'��,� QAe, aand any piece of land can only be in one storm sewer di��x�.�t. Mr. Kemper said that it seemed that very few people Qc�m�1,�i,��d of f�.00ding. He commented that the Riedel property ��e ��n � catch basin since the City existed. He then asked the Couric�,1, �.� ti��,s project is going in. Mayor Harris Pro tem said th�,� it ia the policy of � e Council to weigh the information x�e��.v�c�, c�et the public's opinion', then try to make a fair and hc�nes� decision for the good of the City. He said that there will �a� �o decis�.on made tonight. This' Public Hearing is just to get the ,��.��,�e�'s �e�lin9s. ' ��,� �U��,,�,� �I�i.R�NG �t`I�iG OF �7ANLTARX ].3 , �.969 PAGE 28 �* ��,,��y�� Nprd, 6805 Washington Street said that he was confused �aput �kh� alternates Mr. Ingaldson brought up. Mr. Comstock then �],�;�,�n�d �hem again with the costs . Mr. Nord said that we still havA gxt7wth coming to the City, but there is not a great deal of. land le�� available. He then br•ought up the Engineer's criteria uged called �hQ � year frequency rate, and felt that this is a �a.gh cost to pay for a storm once every five years. Mr. Comstock qs�mm�nt�d that the txequency rate used by the freeway system is a �p ye� �xequency rate, and they feel that if a storm causes t�oubls� once in 50 years with a freeway,then it is underdesigned. Mr. A.A. Ku�Cawski, 6131 5th Street N.E. asked if the storm sewer wpu�.d �� x'unning in front of his home. Z'he City Engineer said no, �e w��er �'uns south into the University Avenue Service Road openinc�. Mr. Kukawski said tha� the land directly behind his home is not �.ncluded and would not be assessed and wondered why. The City ��tqin�er said that once the improvement is ordered in, then exact �igures can be arrived at. He $aid if he is not assessed under pxoject ##80, he would be assessed under another storm sewer district. M,i; ��{uicowsk�. pointed out that the soil is very sandy and the water soaks �.n very faat. � Mr. R.D. Habel, 392 66th:Avenue N.E. said that he had receive+d four l,ettets of notification of Pub lic Hearings for improvements. Iie �aid that he has found that his assessments for all the improve- mqx�ts wi11 be in excess of $3,000 and he felt that he, arid a good xn�a,� Q� his neighbors could not afford this kind of assessment ��d would be driven out. He said that he would encourage the Council, �o �.o4k ��k areas such a� his to see if there was not so� way of acCOmp].�shing this in stages so that the assessments would not be such a blvw all at once. Mr. Darrel Saari, 6161 5th Street N.E. said that he agreed with Mr. Kukowski that the soil is vexy sandy and there is no problem as the ' �,,�� ;�c�aks in ver'y fast . �'. George Meissner, 373 Mississippi Street asked how the Hayes Sahaol woul.d be assessed. Mayor Harris Pro tem said that the s�haa�. wcauld be assessed at the same rate. Mr. Meissner said then �,�tu��.ly the Citizens would pay into District #14, and also pay thei�' � as�essment. He said that the problem always seems to �pt� 'b�ck t4 the Riedel property where water has always stood. �,+h� Gitx Attorney said that the City has an obligation to provide prqper dxainage, and pointe�i out that if the City was the owner of th�.s p�,ece of property, we would be entitled to use it, however, �tQ ��.� that if the heirs were to' brir�g suit against the City, they v,rQU1d not win their suit. He said that t�he vwners of this property � � � � , ' a�FFCTAI,, PUBL,�� HEARING MEETING OF JANUARY 13, 1969 ' � � PAGE 29 are entitled to proper storm s�wer drainage the same as everyone else. Mr. Meissner said that Y�e felt that if the Riedel people were interested in draining their property, they wpuld have to p�y m�ore, as they would de�uve more benefit. He said that he could not see hvw his property would benefit. A Visitor to the Meeting said that he lives on Baker Avenue and ' �there will be no pipe in his street, so he could not see why he was included. Mayor Harris Pro tem said that i.f a pe�rson is in a drainage district, they arp contri,buting water to tl�}e district ' by arunof�. 'I�he visitor from Baker Avenue said that he has only lived in Fridley a short time, but with th is heavy assessment, he could not stay. Councilman Samuelson said that it seems that the problem comes back �o th� Riedel property and the question if the City should purchase samle o� it for a cost of possibly $200,000, or let it be developed to a higher use which could mean a million dollar valuation for the C�ty of Fridley. Councilman Liebl said that he appreciated the comments from the Citizens, and that he felt that the right decision has not been made in the past and,that this Council must look at this problem from a long range point of view. Mayor Harris Pro tem said ti�at he would like to thank a�l the people for their patience and di.ligence in coming to the Meetir,}g tonight. He asked for a show of hands of the people who were opposed to the project. A large majority were against it, only three hax�ds were raised in �avor of the project. Mayor Harris Pro tem said that this item will be back on the next Agenda next Monday when Mayor Kirkham and Counc�.lman $heridan will be able to attend. He said that the �ounc��. will make sure the people will be notif�ed befor� the i�em ,is place�i on the Agenda �or a decision and that not�.fication wi,�.l be placed in the Fridley Sun legal section. MOTION by CQuncilma.n Samuelson to close the Public Hearing on Stornn Sew� P�oject #80. Seconded by Counc�.lman Liebl. Upon a vQ�.C4 votQ, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried. REC..-...�.� M�yc�r Harris Pro tem called a recess at 10:10 P.M. FUBLIC HEARING ON WATER PROJECT #90 ADDF.N�UM #1- �Iayox Har�is Pro tem read the Publ�.c Hearing Notice to the audience. Sp�CI�AL pUBI,IC HEARING MEETING OF JANUARY 13 , 1969 PAGE 30 �iq eacpla,ined that this was not petitioned fqr, but �ame �bout by M,x• Harold Ohl�sson having a p�roblem with hi,s well ru�ning dry. �e said that Mr. Ohlsson has been granted a permit for drillinq a ne�w wel�, hcrwever, there have been other hearings on getting a water l�ne� qn t}�is street which the people objeeted to, and the Counci� �el�t t�at it would be only fair to apprise the residents pf t'he Qos�ibility of their wells running dry also. Tk�e City Engineer said that this street is the only street in the a��a th�t does not have City water. At the previous Public Hearings, tMe people �elt that they had good wells and did not want City wate�C. The proposal is to make an extension of the water line from 67th Avenue, alony University Avenue through 66th Avenue to 7th Street and Mississippi Street to complete the loop and also extend the line into the east end of 66th Avenue into the cul-de-sac. The estimated cost is $26,800.00. �he Fi.r�ance Director added that the rate per foot would be $6.15 plus $150 �er service spread over 20 years at 6% interest. M;�. H�ro7.d Ohlsson, 376 66th Avenue N.E. said that he has experienced well trouble. He tried to get a man to put in a well, but there is only one man licensed for this in the City of Fridley. He said th�t it would cost him about $1, 000 and would be about 93 ' deep. He said that if the City decides to put in City water, he would like them to write an agreement that he would not have to hook up if he has already put in a new well. He said that natur- a1�.y if he goes ahead and puts $1000 into a well, then he would not be in favor of City water. He said that at this time he is bor- raw�ng water from a neighbor as a temporary measure until the re- sul,ts of the Public Hearing are knvwn. He said that if the rest o� his �neighbors want the water line, then he would not oppose it, if he has a�.ready put in a ne�w well, but would want the agreemerit t��t he would not have to hook up. Mayor Harris Pro tem asked the audience to shaw by raising theis hands, hvw many have had welt trouble. Three people raised their hands. Mr. R.D. Habel, 392 66th Avenue said in his case the sand point C].ogged and it cost him about $125 for repairs. Mr. James Thayer, 377 66th Avenue asked what the point was in the loop back af the water line. The City Engineer said it was to prevent the water from becoming stagnant, and by doing so gives added fire �arotection to the residents. He added that there are also tYiree fixe hydraz�ts proposed on this line. Mr. 'I�hayer asked what the $�5p ch�rge is for. The City Engineer said that this was for the ��u�,ce �rom the street water line to the house property line. He �dded that the Council policy is that no street will be improved �t�ti1, a�.l the utilities ane in, also that as a general rule, they ��CIA% PUEL�C HEARING MEETING OF J�NU,ARy 13, 1969 hav� �ot been allawing well permits. page 31 �'. Hd�el �aid that whan he moved to the City he was surprised �hat �her� was not City water there. Before he had always had City water and felt that he could rely on it. He asked if the w�t�r line goes in, would everyone have to hook up. The City • �ngine�r said that all,the people would be assessed, but if some- o�e did not wish to hook up, the Council has not been forcirg the F�ople to do so. Mr. Habel then asked about hooking onto the water system and also keeping his well. Councilman Samuelson said that this is all right so long as the private well system is completely divorced from the City system. Mr. Habel said that in this way the we11 could be used for sprinkling lawns etc. and cut dawn on the w�ter bill. A vis�tor to t,he Meeting said that when the sewer line was put in, a.t went in on the north side of the street and she asked if the water line would go in the south boulevard. The City Engineer a�id that generally the sewer line is put down the middle of the �treet and the water line 10' from it and in the boulevard are ga� lines, telephone cables etc. - Mayor Harris Pro tem asked if there was a change in the watar table, i�k be lqwered. Mr. Comstock said that he did not knaw. Mr, 7."hayer said that his well is 100' deep dowri to the glacial drift �he City uses, A visitor asked if this will be coming in saaetime a�Y��• l�ayor Harris Pro tem answered that r�o one could tell. �'he wells might be good for a number of years or ma.ybe other peaple wi�.1 have txouble within a year . � The City Engineer said that generally the City does not let small prQjects, such as this, but ties them into a larger project so as �k4 get a b�tter bid price. He said fhat they will be letting - ' � contract within 2 or 3 months. He added that it is more expensive to da �n the wintertime as the contractor has to cut through the fxost.. ' � ' ' , A Vis,itor to the Meeting asked what the rninimum charge was for water. �'he Fina,nce Director said $5.00 per quarter or 50G per 7,OQ4 gal�.Qns for the first 10,000 gallons. The meter deposit is �40.Q0 which is refunded when a person l�aves the property. Council- mar� Liebl, said as an example he pays aboµt $25.00 per quarter for ��.V� c��.l,dren and this includes sprinkling in t�e summer. Mayor Harris Pro tem cal�ed �or a straw vote of the audience. It shcyw�d 10 in favor and 8 in opposition. woulc� I ��t�;�,AL �'r,iB�+IC HEARING MEETING OF J'ANLTARY 13 , 1969 page 32 �. qh�,�san pointed out that in the 10 year street improvement. p��gra�n, 6fith Avenue is scheduled to be i.mproved in 1973. At th�t time the residents will have to have water, and it will surely be at a higher rate. lrlX. Z'hayer asked if water and �treet improvements were to.go in, 1�aw would this.affect the taxes. The Assassor-said.that•based� pn a 75' lot the taxes would.be ra�.sed about $10 -$12 per year. �IO�T by Councilman Liebl to close the Public I�earing on Water Improvement Project #90 Addendum +�1. Seconded by Councilman Samu�lson. Upon a voice vote, all votinc� aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried. � M,ayar Harris Pro tem said that because of the emergency, th is will be brought back at the next Meeting, January 20, 1969. PU,BLIC HF.ARING ON VACATION OF A PORTION OF MARSHALL STREET: M�yQx Harri,s Pro tem reac� the Public Hearing Notice to the �ud�.ence. The City Engineer added that the portion under con- sa.deration is a part of the old Marshall Street. It extends from 37th Avenue to the property awned by Minneapolis. He said in thi� street there are many utilities such as N.S.P. lines, gas 1iz�es a�d telephone cables, along with Minneapolis waterworks 1in�s. �e said the City has received letters from the utility companies asking that we retain the easement f.or the utilities. �7'ames i�yde ot the Minneapolis Waterworks said he was here to Qppose the vacation of this portion of Marshall Street. Raymond Hegna, Attorney for the City of Minneapolis, said that he appreciat,ed the opportunity to appear before the Council. He s��.d that relations between the City of Minneapolis and the City of Fxid�ey have always been quite good, but in this case he said �hQ �it� of Minneapolis must object to the vacation. He said that �h� City of Minneapolis Y�as been gY'a�illg ancl plawing snaw on that sa�ti.on o� th� road. He sa�.� that the main water plant is at the north end. He said that Minneapolis uses this road to haul sludge fxom tl�e sludye beds. To close this road would mean they wauld have ta use East River Road for their hauling. He pointed out that th� Ci�y a� M��neapo�.is has 6" sanitary sewer mai�s in the street ��d ��,�� has lines there also. He said �hat vacation of this Sta�ee� wQUld be detrimental to the City of Minneapolis. He said t�a� h+� understood N.S.S.S.D. petitioned for this vacation. He sa�.c� h� �e�t that N.S.S.S.D, is premature in it's request. In a �t�w �+��.rs, the City of Minneapolis will need only one sludge bed , SPECTAL PIJ�LZC HEARING MEETING OF �ANL7A,Ry 13, 1969 1 Page 33 r��her than two. He said that he would like to ask that the re- ' $u,�st for vacation be held in abeyence until a year from nvw. Counc�.�,man Liebl asked if they really needed this street. Mr. 1 H�g�a s��d yes, for about three years. After the reclamation process is installed, then it will only have to be cleaned about onc� in 20 years instead of twice a year. Councilman Liebl ' a��ked then after three years the City of Minneapolis feels they wi11 �ot n�ed the street. Mr He na said th t i • 9 a s r a.ght . , Coun��,�man Samuelson said that there is a disagreement between the �i�y o� Minneapolis and N.S.S.S.D. He suggested the possibility o� bui�.cling a dam o� the Mississippi River, as this would also ' ��ovid� a recreational area. Mr. Hegna said the Corps of Engineers s�udied th�s, but did not think it feasible. � '•.;:: ,,;;,:�,�, � :.. 1�'. �iyde said that it cost about $60,000 every year to empty the sludge beds. He said the machinery they use is very heavy. Fie sai.� a.n regards to the dam proposal, the amount of water Minneapolis w�,].1 need is 300 million gallons per day, and in looking at the pond�.ng area, it was found it was not deep enough for it. Mayqr Harris Pro tem asked if, since the City of Minneapolis is a first cla�s city, would they pay for any services, such as street ligY�ting anc� Police protectior� etc. Mr. Hyde said that he did no� knaw any stzeet lighting was proposed for that area. �In,e F�na�nce Director asked what is the position of Minneapolis , wifih r�gard to payment on assessments on prop�,rty. Mr. Hegna s2��.d no��na�,1y if assessments are pn them, they have be�n paid, ��.�hQU�k� l�,e did not think there is any obligation to pay. 7,*he , Financ� Director said his understanding a�as that some agreemqnt was reached for payment on services. ' � �� ' ' ' M�'. H�rold Harris said tha� his access easement has not been ��►�olved yet. He said tha� he must have access on the west side Q� l�xsh�ll. Street. He said their only access to their property is f�om �x�h�ll Street. Mayor Harris Pro tem asked if that was not � 9� yQar lease. Mr. Harold Harris replied that was correct. The' C�.�� t�orr�ey asked if he had discussed this with N.S.S.S.D. Mr. FI�']c�.s �aid he had discussed this 6 months ago but not7zing has come a� i�. Mr. Richard Harris said that he is also involved in this piece o� property. He said that he thinks it is up to Mr. Meyers i�•�.�.S.A.s'lawyerj to take care of getting this access. He said fih�t h� ha�s never made a move to approach his father or him. He sa�d h� wpuld like to see an agreement in writing for access before t��.� va�a�ion g oes through. fip�;;C�,A,L pUB�+TC HL1IP.ING riI;LTING OI�' JANUAP.Y 13 , 1969 Page 34 �ayor. Har�i� Pro tem e:�plained that this ta�:es sorne.,time... He;_.,. sai.d ano��her pro'Ale;n was tha�c N.S.S.S.D. hired ano�her lawyer. �. ��,chard �-Iarris said tha�c he and his �;ather have been at this far � years and have beon �crying to be pa,-�ierr�. i3e said that, ihey a7C� not ac�ainsc this vaca�cion, but in 5�ears N,S. S. S.A. sta,7.1.-Y�aS �;o� come �orth wi-ch one thing for i:hem. -�his is whX they iel t they mus�: hav� an agreemerri: ior acces� i� w�itin�. He then broucJ�� up the qu�stion of who wa� c�oi.ng ta main�caa,n �his s'�:reet i� it �.S vac��ed, the City or DT. S. S. S. D. . . ' , � � ' NiQr1�zON 7ay Councilman Lieh1 to close the �Public Hearint; on the Vacation' p� a Po��iioi� o� Marshal? Si.reet. Seconded by Council�an Samuelson. �1pon � t�Qice vp'i:e, all vo�c�.ny aye, Mayor �Iarris Pro tem declared the mo��.an car�ied. � PUB�IC �IEA�.RZNG ON STRLi�`i^ II�ROVEMENr PROJECT ST. 1969-1: . Maypx' Ha�x�:s Pro tem read the Public Hearing No�ice to the audience. '�,,,tivervie�w �i'errace• T�iississi i Place to Mississipri ��ay �he Ci.ty �nc,��.neer said tha';: th � s stree��: was brou�ht before �he • Cpunca.�. tca get service to the commercial area. He said it woulcl be 36' w�.�:h concre�e curb and gui;ter ancl a blacictop surface. The �:o��.al i.mpx'ovement cost is $?.4G0. He said ther� are some �ti�.ities to bt� �.na�;.al.J.ed and will be installed by the developer building lnorfi�h a� i�Iiss3.ssippa. Way. �'he �`i.nanCe Direc-cor added i:hat the estimated cpst per ioo-c is �fi�.�.��.. Maycax Haxxis Pro tem called ior commen�s for or against the im�ravement;. There was no aresponse. �iississi�,pi Way: Easi: River Road to Rzverview Terrace (So�tth ox Fridley Parl:) �hQ �a,�.y Enga,ne�r said tha�c the reason ror this was to provide se�ya.ce �.o �he apartmeni: complex area �n the northwes� corr��r oi' Mi�s�.ssi��api Way and East River Ftoad. He �aid �t would be a 3G' stx�e'� w�.th some utilit.ies to be insi:alled by i:he devela��er �o the �p7��.h,. Fie said there ��ere some problems o�i�h ric�ht of way �t Eas� R�vex+ F.oad and imnrovement o� inter_section o-�' MississipP�. S�. anc� �ast kt�.ve� Road. AnoJca Coun�ty has to approve the intersectian. U�n��,�. �.�,a� p7,an is pu� in�ca ef_�ect the easterly iew feet will have � ' �k�PCIA.�, �tJ$LTC HEARING MEETING OF JANUARY 13 1969 a , P ge 35 ' ' ' to 1ae �emporary. Also the existing street light standards will be in the way for permanent improvement. West Se�vice Road - T.H. #65: Rice Creek to Minnesota Transfer� Railwav Trac}: Ri ht'of Wav North Line The City Engineer said the reason this is before � because of the 73rd Avenue loop back to serve the hou$e. H� said this was brought to his attention ' Samuelson as N.S.P. is anxious to get their prope He said he has not ha;d any respons� from the peop and af the property. the Council is Target ware- be Councilman rty landscaped. le at �he north Jerry Lohmar of N.S.P. said he would like to have a picture of this to see i� this would have any effect on getting into and out of their property, Coun��.lman Samuelson said John Pearce, Manager of N.S.P. said that they would �andscape after the improvement was in. The City Engineer said the only crossover is at the north end at the Minriesot� Transfer Railway tracks, then the traffic would go ]aack dawn on the service road. Mayor Harris Pro tem said the Administration will give all the information to N.S.P. and then i�t wi11 be placed on the next Agenda. He asked Jerry Lohmar if th is would be all right. He replied yes. Councilman Samuelson asked if there was no turn around at the south ez�d. The City Engineer said that the road could be stopped anx place, but was brought all the way south to the park property. �he City Engineer was asked to coordinate with the Parks and Recxeation Co�nission on the street area involving the Park. Z'he City Atto�ney said that the representative from Pennsylvania Oil Company was here earlier, but has left and suggested the Adminis- tratian get their feelings on this. East Service Road of Eas t River Road• Starting from 1,000' � South of South Leq of I. 694 Interchancre Northeast to Railroad Riqht of Wav (Tract "J" Proposed Registered Land Survey) , 7.'he City �ngineer said that this was the first stage of the development of Great Northern Railway to ser�e Plywood Minnesota. He said that it is a 40' industrial road. He said only one mat an�3 ' w�st curbing would be put on a� th is time. The final mat will be placed on when all the utilities are in. Mr. Brokopp of Great NQrthern Railway said they would proceed from there. ' ' S��C�,d#T, PCT�3LIC HEARTNG OF JANUARY 13 , 1969 page 36 aeventh Street• Mississippi Street to 68th Avenue Tra►e Ga.�y Eng�.neer said that this street will depend on the outcome o��he storm sewer hearing. � 1y�, '�hayer �sked if petitioned for �rom Missi$sippi Stx'�et ta 68th Avenue. �he City En�ineer said the pe��.tian was from 67th Avenu� naa�'�h .� Mr . Thayer asked aboµt the est �.mat�ed cosfi . The ��,n��e� p,itactor said the estimated cost for property with side y��ds on 7th Street is $3.19 per �oot. The estimated cost for propert�y facing onto 7th Street is $8.20 per foot. He added that if t1��.s whol,e area is done there would be some combining of costs xesulfi�ing i�} the actual cost being less. This Preliminary Roll �,� t�Or�e :ln fi;his way to be able to give people an idea of what it will Cost th8tt�. He �aid whenever possible, areas are gx'ouped toyether. �QU,�ilmar� �,iej�� said i� the storm sewer, water line, and street 1�pxc�vq�n4nts were all to go in the total cost should be less . The ��,�y �gi,neer added that the City gets better b ids if areas are g�ouped aa units. 66th Avenue• Universitv Service Road to Cul-de-sac �, Vis�tq�' to the Meeting asked if the water line were to go in, wou�.d tk�e contractor fix up the street in the same condition it was ?a4�ore. Mayor Harris Pro tem said yes. The City Engineer �dded fih,at �t is felt that the street improvement should yo in �� th� same ti,me as the water line. Councilman Liebl asked if thi� wou].d result in a saving. The City Engineer said yes. ��µ��,�,�n Liebl pointed out that fire �.nsurance for residents on 66th �Avenue would go dawn with the addition of three extra fire hyd�ants. ,� V�,�i'�or to the Meet�.ng said the sanitary sewer is on the north �a,�9,g, sp wau]�d the water line go in on i:he south side. Mayor �axri� Px'o tem said the Council will consider this point if the w�t�x' 1�.�� is ordered in, but not the sLreet. A Vi�itox asked haw wide the street would be. The City Engineer 5��.�9 3�a' b�Ck to back with concrete curb and gutter on both sides. �, V�.a�.tq� asked about 67th AvPnue. The City Engineer said it w�s a 4p' xo�,d and the assessable cost was $9.37 per foot. �. ��be�. asked if the concrete curb and gutter was extra. The G�.ty �l�gineer said that was included along with the blacktop in �,'�� s��.m�te. M�r. Thayer said that he had been calculating his �o�i�1� �ss�ssments and he came up with aY�out $2,610. He said he Coulc7 no� see where his property would benefit to that amount. � ' S�'��,�, pUBI,IC HEARTNG MEEri'ING Or^ JANUARY 13 , 1969 Page 3 7 ' 68th Avenue: Rice Creek Terrace to Washinctton Avenue � The City Engineer said this was �ne of the streets which need ��orm sewer. A Visitor asked the estimated cost. The Finance Director answered $2.54 per foot. , ' �11den Wav: 62nd Avenue to 200' North The City Engineer said that when the hearing was held on 62nd Way,�.t was pointed out that this short section should be included. Jefferson Street: 6"1th Avenue to 680' North A V,��ita�r asked if this was petitioned. The City Engineer said ' yes, and had received over 51°o signature$. He said he liv ed on �he corner of Jefferson Street and 67th Avenue and wondered haw he wQUld be assessed. He said his side yard is on Jefferson St. ' Tk�e Finance Dizector said in that case it would be for 135', 1/3 af $9,97 per foo�. 1 Washincrton Street: 67th Avenue to 500' North to 68th Av� A Visitp� s�id he had taken the petition around, but naw sees , tha� it is acheduled for improvement in 1�73 under the 10 year �treet ,�mpXOVe�nent program. Mayor Harris Pro tem said that the 10 yea� street improvement program was started before the petition � came in and that Washington Street would be included in the 1969 pragram. � ' � ' ' Seventh Street: 68th Avenue to 480' North 'Z'��re was no one present who wished to be heard on this improvement. �ourth gtreet: 67th Avenue to Rice Creek Terrace �'h�e w�,s no response trom the audience. Rice Creek Terrace: Hiqhway #47 Service Road to 68th Ave. There was no one who wished to be heard. �iiqhwav #47 East Service Road• Ric� Creek Terrace to 300' Sou�h Thi� was agreed to be deleted at the last Public Hearing. 62nd Wav: Riverview Terrace to East River Road Caunc�.lman Liebl ask�d why trh� �i�f�ez�nce in cost between Alden Way �nd �i2nc7 Avenue. 'I'he City Engineer said this was because there were . , S��IAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JANUARY 13, 1969 Page 38 iive side xards on 62nd Way. The Finance Director added that 62nd Way and Alden Way will probably be grouped together for cost purposes. Mr. Richard Harris said that he had looked at this site, and could not see the five side yards. The City Engineer shawed him on the half section map. Mt. Harris asked if any City services would have to ba changed. �he City Engineer said he did not think so, but if so, the alterations would be charged to the proper department, such as water, sewer, etc., rather than to the project. Mr. Harris asked that he be contacted when work is ready to comsnence in t�ont of h is house. Third Street: 49th Avenue to 53rd Avenue The City E�gineer showed the slide on the screen. Liebl said tha� he felt that this �hould be a 40' road with part of the funds coming from State Aid. Councilman industrial MOTION by Councilman Liebl to close the Public Hearing on Street Tmprovement Project St. 1969-1. Seconded by Counc,ilman Samuelson. Upon a voic�e vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried. TEN YBAR STREET IMPRO�VEMENT PROGRAM: (For areas south of Rice Creek ar�d east of Highway #47 in Fridley, Minnesota) The City Engineer explained that in the last five years the City has been improving the old streets at a rate of about 2 miles per year. There are sti.11 about 17 miles of streets not up to City standards. He said this schedule should provide better streat improvement through advanced planning of construction, advance information to property owners, proper temporary repair of streets until permanently improved, and reduced engineerinq costs. iie then suggested that they be taken year by year, givinq anyone an opportunity to ask questions under the proper year. 1971 A Visitor to the Meeting living on 5th �treet said that a cemetery is across the street from him and asked a?Zout assessments. Z'he Finance Director said that it would be assessed, as are schools and churches. M3yor Harris clarified the point that none of these improvements have been ordered in and that t is is just an informal hearinq and a legal Public Hearing would be necessary later. .' ' � ' �� J SPECIAL PU$�I� HEARING MEETING OF JANUARY 13, 1969 1972 --r-- Page 39 �r. Richard French, 1469 Gardena Avenue asked about the width of Gardena Avenue. The City Engine�r said there were no specific plans at this time. This wauld be determined at the time of the legal Fublic Hearing. Mr. Frinch said that when this was to be improved before, he took a petition around against it. He said he was not opposed to the improvement, but did not feel that it should be a State Aid road with sidewalks on both sides. Mayor Harris Pro tem said as he recalled, the people were not ' against tYie improvement, but that they did not want this to be a State Aid Street. ' ' ;: �; � , ' , A Visitor asked if Stinson Boulevard is a County Road. The City Engineer said no, but it is hoped that the City of Fridley can coordinate with New Brighton for the improvement. Mr. Rodney Johnson, 1646 Gardena Avenue said that it seems the City is assuming the residents want Gardena improved, but that they do not. He saicl when sewer and water went in, the streets were not put back in good condition. He said that the street cannot be imQroved without a storm sewer. He said that maybe quite a feiw may want the improvement, but there is a limit to what a person can afford. 1973 A V isitor to the Meeting said that he would like to coimnend the City on the planning and forethought that went into this program. ' 19 74 ) 1976 ) There were no comiaents on any of these streets from 1977 ) the audience. ' 1978 ) MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to close the informal public hearing , on the 10 Year 9treet improvement �rogram. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote. all voting aye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carried. ' REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE BY GARBAGE HAULERS DURING SNdNI F.MSRGBITCISS: � Mayor Harris Pro tem said that the City Manager has received requasts from garbage haulers in the City for assistance by the residents during the snaw emergency. They would like the residents ' ��,1 �� H�AIG ME��'TNG OF ,��1NU,�X �3 ,�.�69 F�g'e 40 �Q ��,�Q� �,'��,a� g�,rl�ag� aans near the driv�wa� �enever possible. �� c�a�k��g� '��u7.ea�s wil� '�e publishing the�.r are�u�st in the �� w �'�Q�T �ay Ca�ncilman Lieb], to concur with the request and bring �.� ?a�Ck �� e ne�ct Meeting when the rest of the Council wil� be ��+��. ��q�ded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, al�. Vo�ing �ye, Mayor Harris Pro tem declared the motion carr�ed. ;��, T� �+'LQVE TEMPOR�IRY SHED FROM STANDARD STATION TO SHELL OIL P k TY ON 61ST AVENUE: RE UEST BY MINNEAPOLIS STAR ZvtpT�qN �X Gouncilman Samuelson to table this request until the �u��.dir��' ��ndards - Design Control can review the plans. Se- �Q�d�d '�y C�un�ilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, ,�,�yp� ��x��.� Pro tem declared the motion carried. y:,, ` .` • _ � Y �.�. � = !�: 4�t�y' �. A�h�.k��rg a0Q 92ric� Avenue N. E. 87.��, M�annesota Position Water Dept. Re�laces � clarence Trebus ��p� b� Councilman Samuelson to concur with the Administration �,i� '�h� ap�a4�.ntment of Gary Dahlberg to the Water Department . 9a�Qr�d�d'�y eQUncilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, ��ro7� ��'�'�.� �'�o tem declared the motion carried. M��+'q�' H�'�i� Pra tem asked that the Resolutions appearing on toni�ht'� A,ge�nda be brought bac�C for the next regular Meeting due fio �he l�'��+�ess o� the hour . This will also give t'he Council some ti.me ��aa� ao�sideratian. • r � � Mt�'��q�' �ay �out�cilman 5amuelsor� to ad j ourn t]ne Meet ing . Seconded by �QUncilm�a� T,ie'��.. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Harris Fro '�exn c��+c�.�red the Special P�iblic Hearing Council Meeting of ,��nt��r�;r ],3 , 1969 ad j ourned at 1:10 A. M. R �a+�c� # �� tted , � �%Q1 M��'��+� g�ca��a��y �ca tl�� Council Jack O, Kirkham Mayor RESOLUTION N0. 2-1969 A RESOLUTION TO 1'HE VILLAGE OF MOUNDSVIEW TO REQUEST HELP FROM THE RAMSEY COTJNTY COrIl�IISSIONERS TO UPGRADE COLYDi� RQAD H2 FROM COUNTY�S WEST BOUNDARY LINE TO TRUNK HIGHWAY N0. 10 WHEREAS, Onan Industries is building a complex of over thir- teen million dollars at the West end of County Road H2, WHEREAS, this complex will have approximately siac�� .u�a- dred employees aanc� tk�e asajority of them live in Ramsey County, and wi11 use County Road H2 as their main access to this industr�al comp- lex, WHEREAS, Anoka County has improved extension of �h�s road i�i Anoka County, WHEREAS, all this new construction is going to create a considerable amount of additional traffic volume, WHEREAS, County Road H2 (73rd Avenue) will serve as a direct route all the way from Trunk Highway �k 47 tu Trunk Highway �� 10, WHEREAS, the City has received a letter from G. Larry Griffith of Dorsey, Marquart, WindMorst, West and Halladay Law Of- fices representing Onan Industries asking the City of Fridley to re- quest Ramsey County for the improvement of County Road H2, NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the Ci[y of Fridley, Anoka, County, Minnesota, as follows: THAT the Village Council of Moundsview is requested to ask Ramsey County to upgrade County Road H2 from the Ramsey County West boundary line to Trunk Highway No. 10. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 6th DAY OF January , 1969. MAYOR JACIZ 0. KYRKi�AM ATTEST: CI�'X CLERK MARVIN C, BRUNSELL i jr i �'� � �� 560-3450 . � � �� --_�� - �4 � r � ��'� �/�� . � (./ / �.,d � � 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE�dUE NE ANOKA COUNTY FRIDLEY, MIP�NESOTA 55421 January 16, 1969 Mr. Harvey Peteison, Chai_rman Anoka County Commissioners Court House Anoka, Minnesota 55303 RE: Reqtiest for Takiiig Over � Improving of 73rd Av Between Highivay #65 � Central Ave, e' Gentlemen: Attached herei�rith you ivill find Resolution Fridley City Council requesti.ng that 73rd Avenue Hightivay #65 and Central Avenue be taken over and Anoka County this year. #1-1969 of the bet�veen improved by Also enclosed is Resolution #2-lg(,g requesting the Villa e of Mounds Vieiv to ask Ramsey County to upgrade 73rd Avenue � (County Road H-2) from Ramsey County �Vest boundary line to High�vay �lp, We j;,�llld certainly appreciate any help your honorable body can provide in this respect. A copy of the letter from Nir. G. Larry Griffith of Dors Marc{uai-t, Windhorst, itest �, Halladay representing Onan Indusey� tries in regard to their request for improvement of 73rd Av between Highway #65 and Central Avenue is enclosed, enue The Onan Plant, ne�a Stuclebaker Central Offices, and other industries being constructed in this area �vill contribute tremendously to the economic stature of Fridley, Spring Lake Park, and Anoka County. Cooperation with these large indus- tries can be insti-uniental in enticing more �ob producing firms inio our mutual areas. We would appreciate your favorable consideration and quick response to this renuest. � 1 �� ' � CC: Bernard Steffen ACh 0. KIRKHE��I ,�IqYOR ' ' County Coordinator Jake Lundheim, County F:ngineer Dean R. Anklan, Ramsey County Engineer Ramsey Cotinty Commissionexs ' ' � � , � ' u � � � � ��1 /� 560-3450 % �� ,� -��'�i'�� '�" .�%'f�✓�:�� ANOKA COUNTY 6431 UtdIVER51 i Y AVENUE NE January 16, '(9(�� FRIpLEY, ldINNE50TA 55421 The �Io.norable I. C. Rustad Mayor. of. Mou.nds Vie�•� 2401 �Iigh`•ra,y ��10 Mounds Vie�•r, Mi.nnesota 55� 12 � Re: Requesf; For Uporading Of County Road H-2 My dear_-Mayor Rustad: Enclosed herewith you will find Resolution #2--196g of the rridley City Council requesti.ng your Council to ask Ramsey County to upgrade County Road H-2 from the County's West boundai�y line to T.H. #�10. As this road is goin� to be a through route between T.H. #47 and T.H. #10, and there is considerable new construction alon� this road, this street will be carryi.ng a quite high volume of traf�ic. This traffic trill steadil.y increase dur_ing the .year as Onan, P�Iedtronics anc� Studebaker complete their construction and launch into full operations. The Onan plant, New Studebaker cen,tral offices and other industries being , constructed in the area will contribute tremendously to the economic statuse of Fridley, i�Iounds View and Ramsey Count,y. Our cooperatio.n with these large industries can be instrumental in e.r_ticing more job producing firms into our mutual areas. We cextai.nly would appreciate whatever youx ho.norable body can do to get County Road H-2 up;raded. The sections of the road in Fridle.y have alread.y been improved last year. Thank you f.or �rour consideratio.n. CC: D. S. 7,ylla, Cler�: Administrator. Ramsey Courty ComLrnissio.ners E. J. Lundriei_m, Anoka County ��inAer D. R. Anklan, Ra,�se,y Cou.nt.y ��ineer e Sincerely yours, . �C D ��., JACK 0. KIRFfff�.�'I Mayor of Fridle.y CONSIDERATION OF REMAINING APPOINTMENTS �0 COrIl�lISSIONS BOARDS COI�QTTEES AND SUBCOMMITTEES FOR 1969 TO COI�LETE RESOLUTION N0. 3-1969.(Tabled 1/6/69) PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS - STREET AND'UTILITIES (3 Year term - 5 members) Present Members Ex ires Appointee Effective Date William E. Jensen - Chairman Thomas Myhra - Vice Chairman Donald Batterson Harry Crowder Daryl Nagel U on a 489 Rice Creek Terrace P ppointment. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 12-31-68 FRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSi�N (No date of expiration or specific number of inembers designated David 0. Harris 470 Rice Creek Blvd. Robert E. Christenson 231 Rice Creek Terrace Virgil C. Herrick 5700 Tennison Drive Donald R. Mittelstadt 6940 Hickory Drive Leonard Samuelson 7800 East River Road Robert Schroer 7886 Firwood Way N.E. L. E. Torrey I-694 at Main Street N.E. Present Members Charles E. Johanson 160 Hartman Circle Donald Stotts 5250 Taylor Street N.E. .'William Drigans 1060 Lynde Drive George Zeglen 841 Rice Creek Terrace Tom Dean 739 Mississippi Street Charles Hall 5818 Hackmann Avenue William E. Jensen 589 Rice Creek Terrace Don Blair 206 Rice Creek Blvd. � ' ' � ry. � 02D ( NA.PJCE h�0. 358 AN ORD i iali^dCE EST��L 15t� i PJG A SUf3-COF-iP,1 I TTEE QF 1 TFiE PL�1�Pd I�1G COf�1t�1 I S� ( ON IIS T!-IE BOI�,RD OF �1PPEALS AND aDJUSTF!EtdiS 1��dD 'RCPEALING SECTIO�lS 45.3g, 45.38 I , �5.39, �5.39'1, �5.392, 45.393, 45.394, � �5.40. 45.40 I , 45. �- t , �5.42, �5.42 I , �5. �t22, ,nd 45.423. The Counc i( of 'che C i ty of Fr i d I ey do ord�-� i n . s fo I 1 o►�rs : The Counc i I hereby :•ppo i nt s�� sui�'-comm i t�ee of the Fr i d I ey f? ! a.nn i n g Comm i ss i on to serve ��s �he f3oard of �tppea I s and Ad justr�ents �nd to exercise �.I I�-�uthority �,nd perfor�n �( I i=unctions of sa'td 6�ard pursuan�t to t�iinnesota St�tu�es 462.351 to 462,36�., S�id �ub-eommittee sh, l I cons i st of f i ve rier�bers i ncl uding t�� Member-at-Large of the P I��nn i ng Comm i ss i on, w�o sh � I 1 servs ,s Ch, i rrn.�n of the E3o� rd of �Ippe�� I s �nd four �dd i t i on� I members, to be appo i nted by �he C ity Counc i I for three ye� r terr,�s. The or i g i na 1� ppo i ntrnent shou 1 d be st�;ggerecl so t�� t no more th �n two members terms sh�-� I I exp i re du r i ng �ny one c� I end�,r ye.�r. Section ll. Tlotice of He�ring. No-� i ce of he. i� t ng of � ny ,ppea 1 s before the f o.�rd of Appe� ( s sh�z I I be pub I i sl�ed i n the off i c i a l net,�sprper once at I e�,s� ten d,ys before tl�e day of he�,,rin�. In �ddition, m�i led notice sh�-�) I be sent �t te�st ten d,ys before the date of lie� r ing to those p�rt ies �nd persons known to h��ve �,n i n�eresi; i n the �ppe� I, However, f�, i t ure to g i ve m� i l ed notice sh�ll not inv�lidate the public hearing or jurisdiction of the Borrd of ,4ppe�� i s. Sect i on I((. Pub I_i c He� r i n�L�� nd Record of Proceed i nc,�_ AIl he.�rings of.the �o�rd shal( be opened to the public. Any p,rty m�>y � ppe� r� t�;he he��r i ng i n person or by ��ent or � ttorney. The Bo,rd m�,y � dopt ru I es for t(ie conduct of the proceed i n�s before it . Such rules may include provisions for giving o�ti�s to witnesses and the f i I i ng of wr i�:ten br i eis by the p,rt i es . The E3o�,rd sh, I I prov i de a record of �he proceed i ngs i nc I ud i ng the m i nutes of the meet i ng, it s f i nd i ngs of f�,ct � nd f i n� ( order ar o�her di spos it ion of the m�tter heard. Section IV. Powers �.nd Duties oi= 't}�e [3o��rd of��eal s. � The 6o,rd sh�:ll he,r .�ppeals �nd review ,ny order, requirement, dec i s i on, or de�err» i n�-.� i on m�,de by the zon i ng � dm i n i strator. ldhere there i s �, pr� ct i c: I ci i ff i cu I ty or unnecess�ry h� rdsh i p i n carry i ng � out �he requirements of the zonin�'ordinrnce, the Bo�rd, ,fter .n ��ppe� 1�-�nd he �r i ng r,�:,y grant � v�,r i��nce of the regu 1�-�t i on s on construc� i on or �� I ter�,t i on of bu i I d i n� s, or other rec�u I,t i ons perta i n i ng � to � re� requ i rer�ent s, set b, ck requ i rement s, or rec�u I� t i o n s reg��rc� i ng p�?rk i n� �=.re�,s, open sps,ce, he i ghth regu I � t i on or the use of I��nd !i. c� , , , 1 bu i I d i ngs or structu, es, sucF� v<-�r i�nces sl�� I I be gr� nted on I y i fi the Bo�rd finds th�t the s tric� en forcement oF the ordin�nce or regul�:tion cre,tes �� h�rdsl�ip th�-�� is unEisu�-�I or unique to the subject property. ' Section V. �Time of ti eartn�. , The 8o�rd s�i�ll hold a public hearing within thirty d�ys �i=ter receipt of the not i ce of npper, (. The Bo��rd sh�.; (( m,�l:e f indi ngs of f�ct � nd order on the ��pe,l within thirty',dt-�ys after the public hearin�. Act i on �r� ni i n� i;he v�r i,nce sh:� I I be by reso I ut i on, must be p,ssed by .� M� jor ity vote of t1�e Soard. �r�,nt i nc� of �ny v�r i�nce n��y be m��de subject to reasonable conditi,ons th,t the 6oard sh�ll prescribe. Sect i on V I. Appe�� I f rom Dec i s i on .' Decisions of the [3orrd of ,^,ppe�ls on �II m�tters within its jur i sd i c� i on �re f i n�, I sul� jec�; to ,ppe � I to the Counc i I � nd the r i ght of I,�er judicia! revie��r �,s provided by I��. Sec�ior� V( f. Tim� Limit for Re��ppl ic�tion. In all c,ses where an �p�e�?I has been t�ken, �-,nd the relief sought h � s been den i ed by -�he SoC rd of Appea I s, no pet i�: i on for i dent i c�� I re I ief sh� I I [�e presented to or be' cons idered by the zon i nc� ,dministr�tor, the f�l�nning Commission, or the City Council until � per i od of= �-t I east s i x months h��ve e I�psed. Section VlII.�e��, Th�t upon effective date of this ordinance �eci-ions 45•3�, 4$•3�1, 45.39, 45.39 I, 45.392, 45. 393, 45.39�R. 45.40, ��5.40 I, 45.� I, 45.�2, 45.421 , 45.�22, t�5.�.23 of �;he C ity Code of the C i-Ey of Fri dl ey Fre hereby repe� I ed � nd �re of no further force �,nd effect . PASSED BY THE C�TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THTS 20TH DAY OF MARCH , ].967. ATTE ST : MAYOR - Jack O. Y.irkh.am CITY CI,ERK -- Marvin C. Brunsell First Reading: 1�7axch 6, �.967 . Second R�ada.ng:_ March 20. 1957 . Publish:_ Maxch 24, )967 . A RESOLUTI ON NO�f/_ � y� y' RESOLUTION SUPPORTING REQUEST OF THE FRIDLEY VOLUNTEER FIREMENS RELIEF ASSOCIATION FOR STATE LEGISLATION TO IMPROVE PENSION BENEFITS OF THE PAID AND VOLUNTEER FIREMEN OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. WHEREAS, The City of Fridley does support and maintain a Fire Depatment consisting of full time paid firemen and also volunteer firemen and, WHEREAS, Said paid and volunteer firemen have formed a legal)y incorporated Relief Association as required by state statutes and, WHEREAS, said incorporated Relief Association has received and administered the relief funds provided by tax levy, insurance rebates, and other sources in a judicious manner until such fund can provide additional benefits to the firemen without jeopardizing the solvency of the fund and, WHEREAS, the present statute does not provide for pension benefits to full time paid firemen . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Cou^cil of the City of Fridley does support introduction of legislation providing for the benefits as outlined in a memorandum from the Relief Association dated ,�anuary 15, lg6g ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THfS o2d � DAY OF �'��' ' 1969' ATTEST: MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell 1:'.:. " ►_:::, M E P9 0 R A N D ll M January 20, 1969 MEh10 T0: CITY COUNCIL MEMO FROh1: Mr. Virgil C. Herrick City �ttorney SUBJECT; Storm Sewer Drainage--Vili� of Spring Lake Park I have on a number of occasions attempted to arrange a meeting between the Village of Spring Lake Park, the Minnesota Highway Department and the City of Fridley to discuss storm sewer drain�ge problems in the area north of Osborne Road and west of 11n i vers i ty ;�venue . While the Highway Department has been cooperative, I have not been able to arrange to have anyone from the Village of Spring Lake Rark attend these meetings. I am of the opinion that bpring Lake Park will not recognize an obligation to participate in the cost of storm sewer probjects unless ordered to do so by court action. I, therefore, suggest that either someone else from the City attempt further negotiation or if the Council so desires, that I be authorized to commence necessary legal action.. •� January 15, 1969 MEMO T0: City Council FROM: Finance Director SUBJECT: Metropolitan Tax Proposal The Finance Committee of the Metropolitan Section of the League of Minnesota Municipalities has under consideration a proposal which involves the � collection and distribution of an income tax, a wheelage tax and a hotel and admissions tax. The Finance Committee will be submitting this proposal to the Metropolitan Section of the League. The League will be voting on this proposal the latter part of January 1969. If approved the League of Minnesota Municipalities will recommend a specific proposal or bill to the legislature for passage. It would then be up to the legislature to either inact or turn down the proposal. A brief summary of the three types of taxes is listed below. INCOME TAX: The proposal is for a 1 1/2o gross income tax on individuals in the metropolitan area. This would raise approximately 53 million dollars. One third would go to the cities, 1/6 to the counties and 1/2 to the school districts. The distribution of the taxes back to the cities would be based on a combination of ability to pay and need. Ability to pay takes into consideration the assessed value per capita of a particular municipality as compared to the assessed value per capita of the metropolitan area as a whole. The need takes into consideration the tax levy per capita compared to the metropolitan area as a whole. The distribution of the school di.stricts would be based on a pupil basis with some adjustments for the different types of students. WHEELAGE TAX: The wheelage tax would be 1/2 of the existing license fee and would raise approximately 15 million dollars. Two thirds of this tax would go to the cities on a population basis and 1/3 to the counties. HOTEL AND ADMISSIONSTAX: This tax would raise approximately three million dollars. Two thirds would go to the cities and 1/3 to the counties. To be distributed on a population basis, � � �: �_.� :.;-� � i , i �:° ,( �i��l� �� !'y` � � ; � � `! :: � � ! �-� i��r��l��,";x'.�-�� i �=:5 314 SOClAL S:,ic�VCES BLDG. • UNIVc°SITY C�r MINyeSOTA MINNEAPOLIS, MIt�:�d., 5: i55 PHO?1E: 373-2??t - 373-2�z� 1��i�'�"��pOL! 1'�+N S�CTIO�! December 19, 1968 To: Metropolitan Area Finance Officers A copy of "A Proposed Metropolitan Section Tax Program" is enclosed for •your information. Whil.e Ghis is not presently part of the Metropoliian Section's Iegislative pr�gram, on January 23, 1969, Lhe general member- ship of the S�ction will take a formal posiLion on this imporcant subject. Without question the mosL controversial and perhaps most important proposal in this tax program relates io the distribution of the revenue from a gross income tax using a formula Which will reduce the present and future fiscal disparities in �.he metr�politan area (see Section 3d and 3e of the Proposed Metropolitan Section Tax Program). ThiS di�tribution formula has a two- fold objective: �1) to provide relief from reg�essive property taxes, and (2) to minimize differences beLween so�called "have" and °7have not" units of government. The reactions we haue recei.ved to dac.e indicate that the rationale upon which th�s formula is based is somewhat difficult to under- stand. Therefore, we are making available the staff of the Metrop�3litan Section (i.e. Dean Lund and Paul Dow� to personally explain the disparity and dis- tr�bution formulas and the orher aspects.of the tax program to you and%or your council at your convenience. In addition, ycu are encouraged to ask questions and make consc.ructive criticism to the staff. Sincerely, �C� � �. Stan Olson President Metropolitan Section PD;slw Encl. ' '-_ . �..:;�._.�.: �.. _... .....�,_. _.:_e�.�,:,� .. .___ ._..__ __ , . _ , � ' � � k �� '�> � 1 ; � � . . . . . �3 t � � � I . .� . 4 ., t� f �. � � G �i � C� � E �� 3 i�J �� : �'� �' i� �� P��li��i�3�;�',�,i � 9vS � ` � . 314 SOCIAI SCI�iJCE� BEDG. ! ; . UNIVERSITY OF kiINtiESOiA . � • � MINNEAPOliS, h11NN., . 55455 � P40N�: 373-.'321 - 373•2322 ��7�Q}%O�� j�N SLC"C'�Q� � � �� Y ' J , 4 i !."�' - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' .i` �_ ' A Proposeci ;�Ietr�politan Section Tax Pra�ram • � _ — _ SUN��fARY Or GJ�1i;S �`�P3D LEGISI.��TIVE RECOrG�1EM?ATIONS �i. . . . . � . . . . , .j.. ' . . ' . .. . V . ; Goal 1. To broaden tha pro�erty tax base az�.d distribute the property .'� tax burden ��o.e equitably by: . ; �, a. Amendin�; Ar.ticle 9, Section 1 of the Minnesota . :�. � �/� Conscitution to permifi the legislature to de£ine � .� f or othezwise limit t.he classes of property now � exempted by the.Cor.stitution. (This is included �� in the L�ague of Minnesota riunicipaliiie� Legis- .fi _ lativa program.) . : . ; b. Establishln.g a legislative interim stucly commission ` ;.� cha.rgecl witn t:�e responsibility o£ making recommen- � �" da�ions for a comprehensive revi:;ion of the property F3 , tax adminiscration laws. (This is included ln the League of. ?�limzesota Municipalities legis].ative i y p.rogram. ) � � 1! ;� � c. Reducing the regressive impact of the properiy tax , s- on low income home-ow�.iers and renters. � Goal 2. _� To reduce existiz�g fiscal disparities between lqcal taxing units in the metropolitan area and thereby reduce the economic incentives which foster fiscal zoning practices by 3mposing a metropolitan-wide tax and distributing it to Local Governments as follows: a. The enactment of a tax on the gross income of f �� residents of the sevezt-county metropolitan area� b. The distribution of one half of the revenue ' resulting fron a metropolitan gross incom� tax ta municipalities (67%) and counties (33�) within the area an the basis of their rel.ative needs and ahility to pay. c. The distribution of the other hal.f of the revenue resulLing from a metrQpolitan gross inconte tax to school districts on the basis of their relative need and ability to pay. �_ - 2 - �� _ .�� Goal 3. �To provide a continuing and gradual2y increasing flow of revenue ta loca2 governments sufficient to maintain local ` services aC desi:�able at�d necessary levels by: a. The enactment of a wheelage tax at the rate of 50% ot the state license fees in the seven-county metropolitan area; � b. The enactment of a 3% admission, amusement and hotel- • motel room tax in tlze seven--county metropolitan area; and c. The distribution of two-thirds of the revenue from the nietropol.itan wheelage tax and the metropolitan admission, 3musement and hotel-notel room tax to municipalities and one-third ta counties on a ' per-capita bas�.s. j,� � '� _ ,� Goal 4. To reCurn locally shared s�ate taxes so as to reflect more f accuraeel the current needs O� ZOC11 y government and the � , services they �erform. ' �• � �i We believe the locally shared sta.te taxes wuuld be of �- � i -- more value to l�cal governments and to their constituents � if the followin� three modifications were adopted: ,; , �: a. Returni.ng shared taxes so as to ref.lect changes - �!l in population resultzng from anneYations; . . b A i � } � ;- . djusting the calendar for returning shared - o�� taxes so as to minimize the need for tax antici- pation borrowing by municipalzties at the beginning o£ the calendar. year (i.e., Ghe fiscal year for aIl buC a few municipalities); c. Develaping a policy with respect to return of ,. � shared taxes to local government which would reflect the financial needs of such units and � the governmental services they perform. (These . , three items are included in the League of . Minnesota �iunicipalities legislative program.) 12/18/68 � � . �� i , ; , � � � �- �^. �-� � ��.; � . t '� g � i: � �i � 1 � %"�i r � J"Y�� €� Z'� i: :� �.� :'' ��. . � • l�f�r.�i ti��i'�.'�! ' � i;�, r M � � > aia scciAt s;i�;��= c��c. � � UN(VERSITY OF ,�5it�,tic�pi�. � � MINNcAPOLiS, M;NN., 55•:tiS � PNO`E: 37�-s".311 • 37�•�;ii2 ; ;.�.__ _._.:' _.__._ __.,. .. - _ _ �. _. _ _.. . _.. _ � � �, � ' ; : . � ': , . � . ._._ - •---- �. ! . � l�i _n1AYQ7?.n;� ii�C�O��.t, tR 5��i i{GI't �r�::i . . . '. _ � . . .r._.. . P:�r_.�;. � .� SOUt'4C� <1:1C� :?riij.�E1�C:1:-=C1 Ce?:: 71'O',i:.t�: ;� Oi v^�:f-i"1'�Lli?l� i;npor-tance CO � � � ` fiite ��ve? apmer.it oL �i, � i::,�,� r ro,'..i �an a� c-� .�; .t � o;a,: 1,� ��- � . • • _f;i�lative �rps ' toward the sol�:l•.:ic�x� �f ou,: �i._cu.t �r��}-1�i�-.s enc,ulc, ;>� taken durinp the 4 Y ' 1909 $EB:�j.OLt Cii l:1tE'. :,l?�;:�.3..�.2�ti.i'E'. 1�USt'�3U'E:t.'; i.x �7�?j YE'Fi� i7L'n�*t-E:3� 7.:i CQ �1E # i� � CtE�7.1:8C�� C:�?ffit��e �tJ3.;.S !l:l?r31. a._ 2.i:ub�7.;j'�3u �;ili: .;�Jt_>C�.ilf. �2�j.5�_1F:�.V4' .. . �� . . � � �rp�rJ5d.�3 �1t.tSi iif.' Q��;f.r;_G7. 6""'� 1�.`' ^� ' J` j . , ,-r.�po�:.t�,n. S+�cti.c,� lias dr;ne alI u� these . � in tha_ cout�e o� c�2velcr-'.�:g ��;i�s ta;c. ;�ro�;�:a�. `v1e G7.I).C�YCI_V I10F? is i� � ± filla�. ��Ci�l.:':.�jT 7.^.7%�i_:^,� �::V.� �3;tC', 1�:P•°7'G� �i'i::'.` ;�l �lS �*1,�1C.� �9 �d$.Ci?.ilt tilE ;. . �' - ELIUjJOii. iiC�i� Qt1Z�7 O� 11U �7.�'L^:.5.' pf:iiC�._.'.,i b�11: d�..iv �l':?Rl COtitZCjr CC:?;ii1jSS:�.f?I16r6� � � _ ��( � � . . 3^�"�00�. t10'1 CI •:.:�G?i>Cs'f;y 7__t_'i:ztf:� ��:c;z;'."; :�.1�.:.i Ui. !.Ot1ZSC.'y �.CV�£1140t'fi. . .. .. . � lilE i:OiAi. �TO�)ZGt?! a�P.AL9 iJ�13.C:1 kTC i!3'ilE.` c dC?X'�S �°G. C?llTS!:.�.VCS L4 c1X.� 23 - .., ... . fO.L�.9tJ3: i7-�.i9�.s L.l�l? c13i�tCnl1:>tY't��C�i�t if r:ilf.�jJ3'��i;.?i=L"�j i�1r,y S£::t)il(�� .Sl'.c'l�. ..� � .. . d3.spa.,rities �.z ,.i�� m�.ru�,a.�i;_an. a:.=��, ttiird; �;rovi.�t,_ng adaquaL•= revenue � : . tf) 6L�)�L�i.t: }.00S.[ K�zr'':C.Ai!t2:i.�. ,Fr•vice:,9 �i.RCl .iOUYi:l13 t:+'t£ ljl.^tYlplll�.0i1 O'�� . .. � 1 � �` .40C'81..1_ ,S. il� l"G't�S ? i� .. n � . Y :;t P i.�h_y. � SUU�;��SL'e� Ct1"K 02� 7_5 iIIr,i��:�tl'?Ci . Fi ��.i7W �OY' each of, til'•ase n.robiE=.a� �raa�. Aft�r eaca o,. _,• . ' � �1 th�._e are so�� gen.er«1 ., _% ..c��iea4-s . n.?;� 4s.��1in� tn th� proh�:em ar:ci on.f=_ crx siore specit� c l�gislative '' � ; ; reco��,enc?atioris i'or ar..��eving th� goa_7_, . ' . ' broade�� tk_e , c�i� --'.Uute�ti�e ro�ert , 1. To �o��c:rty�ta�- b�sa a�i,� �i _.�'�...__.._. Y . i .�. �_ � ° tax_ burdeLz !iSlTt ecu � �ab1y, • � . . - ___._________ . _.._ �- F]i thuut queFt Ro:� tL•e prope� ty [uti caAJ.l r_ont_inue to i�? �he � . • Il13�OT fi0U'..'i',d Oi T2�7cCt.11f.'vtiGT uCC1CU�.o� CQUriZ�F`^a uCl.� • �! c:unicipal.{eic� .P�.� the :.nd�fin:.ta Thi� i� , Tutu�e. �.� ; . � . i?lustrated b� Che `act ti:a� $677 mi?.1ion in rEal and j • t.; _ ' � . �: . � . V. �� . � . . ' . . ' � \ . y � . . I . . . . . . . .. . � .. . . . . • . � ' . ! . f• � I� �. � i . �; • •.; � , � ' ' • �, � ' � :, . � i �, � . �i F � : �. � � i! i i! -- i i i� i, , ;. ; ; . ;: • I; , i � � ;!. ; . 0 . � s: _. _ 2 ^ . . ': p�rsona� property taxes we.:e levied on a statewide basis ' in �965 and of this totu� $31.7 million was levied in the ; , ' seven-counCy metropolitaa area. Even when these fi�ures ' ' ar� reduced to .~ef;.ect a�pro:;imately $2Q0 million of state- � wide property ta:: relief provin�d by the Tax Re£orm and _ � . � . Relief Act of 1967, the property tax still looms very Iarge as a source o� revenue to support local services. � Thus, local offi.cials ali across the state are vitally � � concer:�ed Cha� tiie property tsx base be as br.oad as _ _ possible and taat its administratioix Ue impartial and. equi�able. To achieve this oaal we recom.-nend the following ' three specific pro?osais: . a. Amendinry P._-��ic1e 9�Sac4ion 1 0� the Minnesota • Constitution t:, t;ermit ��e �e�islature to d�fine or. otne�a�ise li.r,:it ",� classes of . . Q-rogerty now exerr,nted by thL Const�tution. . (This is included i:. the League of Minnesota ' . Municipal�ties levislative program.) Since the state Constitutioa caas adopted in 1858, � � , certaic. Glasse:, oL propez�y have been exempted from , . property ta�ati.o;.. Whlle the legislature has had authority to add to these exempt classes, * it has not been permitted to abridge the constitu- . • tional exempeions or to redefine them in the ' � .� light oi ci�.anged c�rca�nstar.ces. � The growth � � . , in the an:ount o° exer,ipt property in recent years, ° augr�ented by libe.al court interpretations of the constitutional e�:er�ption, h�s been viewed with -' - . increasin� cor.cern by Iocal governments throughout .- ' the state.� T� e inc�ease in e:e:apt property from ' 19S6 to J.9�2 ��as much m�re ranid than Che growth � oi taxab3� � rope:t�, i: u17, �;,;, a.ew cou;�ties in � � '' � . ; 1 . i . . •-a . iW,,.... - 3 - � the state,.and ir.dications �r� that the grocath tFj of exempt property has oeen proportionately . , . r. . . . ,, . , greater since 19b2. Admittedly there is no genersl agreement presently on the classes of property t?zat should be exempt fYOn property taxes nor upon the definition of those classes.. however, there is grocaing sentiment � among the leac�ershir of charitable and religious : organizations, as ��•ell as amonb local officials 'and legislators, for redzf�nino'existing exemptions in the light of chanoing cir.cu�r�stances. Such changes in tax-eae:�pt �olicy can be u�de only if the legislatu:e is give:i broader authority�in this' ' field aad then should c,n1y be made after careful study and deliberation to assure that each particular change is equita�le and �n the public interest. This can best be done by an,er.din� �he Ninnesota � ConsCitution as indicated above with the understanding that the nresent exemptions would � continua in e.fect unt�l specifically ciianged by law. b. Establishinry a Iee� slative interi^� studv comr.iission ` �. charged �aith the resnons'ibilitv o•`. :�a�: J recomr.ien- """ datior.s for a co:rnre!:e_ siva revision of the property tax administration � 1.�<<as: (This is' 'included in �' � � � the League of �Iinnesota :�:::nicipaZ�ties legislative progra:n. ) Over the years substant�al and obvious inequities � have bzan bui?t in�o tne nr�sent la�a governing the ' � i � , 'i • iw.. - 4 - � . • . ' , � .' administr�t�un oi tne property tax and serious inad- ' equacies pe_si.st in its 2dr��inistration whicn cannot � � , be ignorei by lcca� of�icials. Ho�aEVex•, rather than , ' approach this very in?o�tant subject on a piece-meal , . . basis we bel.i::ve t:�at a thorough, adequately funded � � • j study of �he r�r.trre syster�i of la;•rs gover:�in� properCy ` • tax admy;istration in the state should be und�rtaken . ' ,, by the le�isiature air.�ad to�•�ard recommendatroas for � th,e compre;�e;•�sive : �v�sioa o� these laws. � This legis- � I � � lative sc�udy co:�L,�ission niivht appropri.ately be . composed o� tha �ae��:oe�s o,`_ the senate and house � tax comr,ii;.tees at:d should co�szder recommendations ' • in the •fcll��in;; s,reci:ic arcas at a minimum: , improverient of c�� ,u�.lity of as�essment o£ . ; •� property for ta:c �ur; oses; tax e;ualization and review procedt:ie; Cne extent ar.n possi.bl� limitation on � the browth of ta:c.•er.ernpt propert��; the ciassif.ication • . of properCy for j.ax purgoses; the impact o£ the , � - � Tax Re°orr,� and Reli,ef Ac� o� 1907 on pr.operCy • tax adminis*_ra�i.on and assessaient; ' the assess- . • m�nt and t2xatioa of in3ustrial and utility � � . faciiities on a regional ba,�is ; and the methods of tahing � ' railroad un,' tel�al:or:e pro�erY.y and the � ial.location of the resulCing r2venue. ' • � � . • e. Reduci_:�� h� re �_-�ss�ve imnact of the oroperty tax � on loca i:�con;e llc::�-o:rr:ers and renters. i � — � •� One o£ th2 r,.ost ,r,ersisCeat and valid criticisms i , 4 ` which is made o� t�c proper:.y tax is that it is z ; • �. ;. � . � very reb:easive Ta.ticu�arZy for lo�o income home- i i ; � � owners. �nat is, ?rJ3exty o��e.rs �aith low incomes . . pay 7.ar�ar perc�n. �e.s ef t':air incoir�� in � . • ..e_: �; ' t y • � 5 - � , • . s_•.� • ' property tak than do t'r.ose with medium and high � . ._ • . . • .. . • , , .' . :a �:•. incomes. This circu��wtance not only raises , ' � . 4 serious questions fron the point of view of equity ' � . '� , . ' , and justice, bu� also teads to heighten resisCance �. � {� . ' to property tax increases which are necessary ' . �• to Pina�►ce educational an3 other local services • �.. , . ' I' ' by low iaco�ne groups, and particuJ.arly by retired . 1 '. � individuals livino on limited fixed incomes. The Tax Reform and Relief Act of 1467 did make some ' p7:ov3sion for special tax xelie£ for elderly . f home-oc,mers and renters with vary limited incomes. � ..�~'S However, since home-owners have to ded�ct the 35x I' .. . . ' relief the� receive unde: this Act from the income ' � �' � . � • tax credits wha.ch they were.e2igible for as elderly I'. ' home-owners, the actual relief provided was very � � •- •. modest. This is illustrated by the fact that in I968 . , : the relief provided under tr�e income tax credit , ' for elderly hone-owners �nd renters amounted to - only,about $1 million, or less than 0.2� of the • � ' ' property taxes levie3 in Minnesota in 1965. The � experience in �disconsin would seem to indicate that � ,;::: � for as little as 1% of the total property tax .� . • ._ . . . . .. '��, ' • ' reve:�ue, it is possible to substantially•eliminate �? . • . i � the reoressive f�atures of the property tax for , �, . the low income elde:ly and tnus nake it basically • '. ' , a proportional method of taxation. However, we j '� believe this ty,e of relief should be provided •�,. .-� ' to all io�a incor,� ro::a-oc��ners and renters and not �� • �! , . . ( i . � 'just those�over 65�ycars of aoe. '� � , � ., . � . � • � � , . . ' _--_.__ _ �3 . 0 -b- :� . . 2. Tu redtice exi:ati��f:_scal ?:�sna�'ities betca�en local ta:cino�' . . �•'' ur.its zn th� r�>eroaol=t2n area and ti�ereby redu�e the . eeonomic ii:cer.tive� s>n�c:� `aster �:.sc2l zonin��ractices. . . ..� . The term "�iscai disp;-�:iti�s" �: s a:r.erged to describe the � � differing capa:ailities of taxing districts to finance their varyinp ne�ds ; or educ::tio.ial snd oE,i�r local services. • . � In other words, �:iere are two i.ndeper.dent variabies invoI.ved iil tf18 a2ili11rf.GII OI' i�:iC2.� GiS�ari:.ies, ��aUlZltj7 �O pay" • and "need.." Cnce�sucn disr�:ities en,Eroe they tend to �� be self-perpetuatzag si:�ce a commu:ity with a poor tax bas2 must necessarily ir.:.�os� r41::tivaly high propexty taxes in � order to sup,o�t evan t::e r.;ost �iaimal of educational and other ' local sexvkces w:�ile u co,;.a:ur.ity tvitn a good tax base can provide a ver�� udcauate leti•cI o� suci services by imposin� a re].atively Iow ��x. O��ce su�h a pat�ern develops i,t creates very strozg ecor.o,.iic_ i:�cc:.t�ves for local officials and particula�ly r,ui:iei:;�al ofzicials to make policy decisions wnich wi1:� tanu to s�t:act �ax base and/or limitthe demand �or pubii.c servic::s .. o� ex:�niple, it er.courages developing municipsl;i.ties in the subu�'�s to zor.e larpe areas for com�erc:;al ar.ci +� dus4:iu1 pu�poses ii. tne kope of building up �heir local ta:� bases, w:,e�her the land in question is • - . �; really suitable for this pu�po�e or not. Similarly, it • , encourages th4 es;;aUlishlr.ent of laroe minimum lot sizes � and related 'oui�.c:ia;; requi�ene:.::s wni�iz tend to iacrease . th� cost of sinule iamaiy residences aad reduce the ponu- lation density, t?�.eraty reduc�r.� the demand ior local. • services, �ar;:icularly sc;iools. • � � � c _ .7 _ , . This latter pracCic� also effectively prevents low income groups, including racial n�r.orities, from moving into suburban commur.ities. These practices, which are often � , terned iiscal zor.�ns, can be dereaded as reasonable and , log�cal from tne poiat o� viaw of the individual munici- pality. {Soneoue :.as described them as a rational response to aa irr�tional syste:a) Ho:Jever, they produce � serious eco:�or.�ic ar:u socf_aI imbaiances wiien �viewed from "�' ` the broader coate�:t of tne en�ire m,etr.opol�tan community. In approachi:;; the problen ot fiscal dfspaYities, there . would seem to oe two basic o�tions or alternatives open to the x.etropolitan con;.^.,unity. jde can decide to take no action ' to renedy the s�tuat:o:� eiCner on tne basis that this does not really constitute a serious �r•oblem in our metropolitaa , community, or �n th� basis tnat the soiutions to it are . � ��orse than the prob�e^ itsel�. However, the.consequen�es .. � of such a decision will•prova very d�f�icult to live with , as tne•inequalitie� in educ�tivaal opportunities bein� offered to c,iildreu in'different parts of the metro- • ' ,politan area beco,�,e prosressively �reater and as the ' disparities �row in the level of other �overnmental services . . ;: being provided. : urti:era;ore, if no re:�edial action is • ' �. talcen in the ir;.aiediate .uture, the f�scal disparities may . • . ' . � ' we12 become so nro:�ounced �s to effectively preclude � ; . � � the solution of this p:obiem. Should this occur, it will ' .�.� � ; ; tend to dicide our .�.et�000yitan com:nunity along fiscal: ' ,• ' � lines and will �:�ke ir_ much -orc diificu�.t to develop ,� ' ' .i common �p?roac`..es to�t::e solution o� ath::. ia.^_tropolitan : ' ' proble-s. In short, ��:�. °u;:ure of our �..tropolitan area as '�� ; • � � �„ J . � i . , � _$_ � ! � � ' � a nalanced and :�altny com�rui:ity �ay turn on our willinoness to reject "no actian" as an alteraative. � i , The other aiterr��tive ia to ��.eet•tne fiscal disparities • ` k proble;a direc�Iy w�tl� a spECi�i.c proposal cahich will work � toward the �orrectio:� of ti:is proble:►. Ir. view of the serious ' ra�i�ications �ahich are l�iccly to result from ."no action," : , t we'believe the or.:.y respoasi�le and er.lightened course of � action is this lat:..:r or.e. ' j . ; Aftez explcrin� a nu��ber of proposals, we believe the most , feasible �e�.^.s oi �c:icvin� tnis end is to impose a tax on � a metro�olitar.-iai�e basis wnic�z will raise a sionificant � amount of revenu� (e.�., $5C million s year or more) and to • , distriuute th}s ;�veaue in a wa� which would redress the • existfzg fiscal disparitics (i.e., on tha basis of relative .�' i , � need and abili�y to �ay). ?aithin this coatext, three ; al;.emative t44es orare �onsid�red, a gross i�come tax, a � , p�ggy-Uack �a�es tax ar.3 an areac•.�de miii levy. These taxes were evaluated on Gh� �as-� of their prcba�le ir�pact on the i i existin� hcaw gropercy ts.:es, their relative progressiviCy ! i , � ar regressiviCy, and their �rooable rate of growth. On this ' . � . � basis, we malce t'r.e .o�.lowi�G recomMendations: k � . ,,, i a. First :'rc.Eerence - the ensct�ent of a t�.:t on { the ��c:,s it�cn:u>. o� residents of the seven- ! ' courLt� r,i,�tro*�o'_ican a:�a havir_.^_ the f�17.owinQ . � �• characteristics: • . � } ! � E (1) The bsse si:ouid be tlie "rtinnesota ,� k � ; Gross Incon:e" beiore Zeductions of . l , � _ , ; state and federal ta�;es as deffned on ' f . . � . � tre taxi,�ye:s` cu�rent :2innesota �Income j ' . � Tax r�tura. � . �. � � t . � � f . � ; � �, : �. . ( t �i � � � �:�.:. � - 9 - ' , ' (2) T�:e ra�e shouid be 1 1/4% of such income, , , . � � Y. . �. . � . . . . (�. � - . . , � bu� cai�ii a: cred�t against this tax of five dollars per dependant, again ., " , usiag the nu:nber o: dependents claic�ed • � on the cu:rent Mint,esota Tax return. ' (3) ::-�e ta:c saould be adninistered and ' �' enzo�ced by t� e l:i..nesota State Department � of Tsxation, ��rith' reimbursement of depart- � -� � . ' ment costs made :rom the revenues of the � tax. . . . .(4) It s�:ouid 'oe tied to and integrated with ' . I � the iiinnesot� state income tax,•including usa o� r::aCe :ing tax�ayer filings, use , of wit'r,hold�no by e:�pioyers, and other . appropr�ate collection and enforcement procedur�s. ' • Tnis tax caou�d.;�i�i•� nearly $53 mi?l�on in 1970. The ' advant��es of this proposal are as f�llows: First, � ' it is quite progr.cssive in i;.s impact up to the $12,000-$15,000 inco:r�a bracke� and beyond that.mildly progressive. T:u:,, it would �end to counteract to . ' somz degree the typically reoressive features of the property tas. Second,;:7e revenues from this source . would grow at ti�e rate nf approx�marely 8% a year, thus p�ovidi.^.g a;;rowir.; source of revenue for the niodi=icatior. of future �iscal disparities: . . : Third, it would nrovide a r,jor new source of zeve:.;:;, for taa su-:r,ort o° ecucutional and other � • local ;c:.ices aa� _.,... decres;z the relaEive ` burdcn p'aced c,� _: ., , ro�c� t�::c. �. ,, . + . . . I. !. i � � i . j i • f � r � ' �. : �. � � i i � 1 � i' I ; __ � � � � I �� :� _ _iq_ � _ . •� b. Sece. ci Pz'e`r_�en; e- t�:e en?:.�:ri2tlt OF a 2% ni�ev- ' ;. back sales tax i7 }'�c. seven-county r,ietYOpolitan . ' . area. � ' • - , � T:.e er.act .ent of a sales tax by the 1967 session ' . oi tha l��islutu�e �a4r.� thaL• as a practical matter' any future sa:ia� tux zn the m�tropoliCan area ' w�uld h�.v� �o �e pi;;�;�-Uacice3 on the existing state ta:c aad obse,:ve t;:� sa:r.e ru�es and e�:emptions. If � ' + . a 2% pi�gy-bacic sales ta:c were levied in tne seven- � county area it c��.::iu be ex�ected to vield at least ' $48 r.:iilioa �n i470. The iavarable characteristics • . of thi� ta�: are 4s fo1Zo�.s: r^irst, its ir�pact would • probab]:y b4 rcugiily p:o�crtional. Second, i� would provade c. �YOF71Tlo sos�ce of revenue (i.e., approximately 7% pe:r anr.uni) f:a::, wl:ich to malce adjustments for • fiscal dispa�ities throc:ghout the metropolitan area. Third, it wouid arov�d� 8 S'��,11f].Catl� L1011'�DTG�@Yty soux'c� of r�venu�� to su; po:-t educational and other local sei�ices. � ' c. Third' P�e�er�nce - r,�aci^.;*. a?5••r�ill �evy on �:Il real and per.sona� prc��>_`,tv in t'.ze raetr000litan area. If $SO millio..o�are to be raised with a metro- . politan-wide p�ope�ty tax Ievy in 1970 �C would • .� require a Aevy of arnroxz�ateiy 35 mills. It should � • be clear t'r:a� tzis 35-�ii11 levy would not be a net adai�ion to ?res��z� �:ill Ievies by mt:nicipalities, � schoa� dis�ricts, and cour.�i�s since all the reve .uCS d,:riveu �ro�: the l�vy� would be disCributed ' back �o Ci.es� u:iits o� local Sovern:,;ent. T;is. ` , � ' i. . � � ' , . � .� ►.�.V.� - I1 - . proposal does :dve aa a3vanta�e ia that if the mill ,• . • � rate were ;naiatainad at a coastant level, the amount � , of rever.u;; rais�d �vould in all probwbili.ty increase over tiaie at �i:e rate of anproximately 47 per annum as �he proge�ty te:c base increased in the whole area. � However, th�s �:o�osal aas a� Ieast two si�:�ificant � disadvan�a�es wn;r:l also aeed to be weighed. rirst, to the e�te:�t t::at the regressive characteristics of � t�e prope.ty t�x are not re.:edied, the burden of ,'" s�pporti:�g educ�cion ann o:.�.cr lecal services would conti..ue to be�r relutively mo:� ,eavily on low income � • families than oa r,iddie and upper income families all across tae me:ro�olit�n area. Second, it '' would cont�naE ti.e historical pa�tera of dependenee ' on the p.operty tax as the ;aajor source of supyort _ for educatior.al and oti�er local services and would _ not provide t;�e c��.v�r�,i�ica�ion of t'te t^x ba • . � se • '. which many v�ew as essan�ia? to the welfare of'local govern:,�ant . The distribut:.cn of the revenue �ron an,y of the sources mentioned above oZ a per-capi�a basis �aould have only a moderately equalizi:o eLfect oa"e;istin� fiscal disparities. .' Thus, in order to a:od�fy sioa��caatly the existiag and futu.-e � fiscal disparit�es it w�il be necassary to develop a � , . distribution rornul� �ahicn measures a:�d co:npare's the d'iffering .� needs for educatior.�I a.�c? �oc�i services in various parts of ' our metropolit;.n a:ca and t::e var�ir. ; ab�lity to pay of municLpa�ities sr,d sc'�ool c:i,t:_�Ls. . • . Tt�o sepa:at� ci.��r��t::i,,:; �or-:ulas wcre �'eveloped containing �. x I I I t � � �. T 12 - Cllia2Y0:1t T(tBc1Sl+YES O� ��c1'�lj-1tj i.0 pay" and "need�� OI12 fOY ' nunicipalities a:�.a. COLL�b ��J a:u: another for school districts. ��• U6ino these forr.:ulss c:e na;ce the following reco�mendations: . d• �[1C'. ci7.S`�i_�]}_`i:10P. C� O:li. il�.l.f O{_____Cilt? 1'CV2YlU0 ' � ;'HSU�.i:�iP.,-,^,,^i"Y�.-��: s �t'..'O;.'v! ii 1:1 ^YOyS incone t3:i� a .: �i�e`L-.:nac:_: ::aies t�_:� or a r;i�i,l�v �_�_ t.__,o munici- . pa�;tias ir,7'.; and co��.:t�es (33�) within tiie area o.^. the b%s�is o hair relative needs and ---___.----�- , � abilitv tr, n�.v. • . �n.this context, t:��re are t�ao ge�er�lly accepted ' measu�es o€ uaili.ty to pay, asse�sed va2uation per ' eapita and persor.a7. incoma per ca�ita. Assessed . < v�.luaticn pe: ca;��t� ::�aSt?.�eS the property tax . base in a�auy e+:�ich pernits relatively accurate coa�parisor.s ��w��'� t�k�n� �L�tricts. Personal . inco�e per ca,�ita :.-�cognizes tr.at real estate taxes on housz:�; ml:st b� P�i.d £rom personal . incon� an3 providas a zelatively accurata means of , measuxi::� tl:e tax payi:�� c�.Pability of the average . resi4erit �.n o.^.e ta:�in� district aJainst that of ; his cour.ter�arts in Ot11B1" t2.X1ri� fIlSCTiCCS. These . t-�ro :actors in corbina:ion (i.e., we3�hCed equally) . ' have been used as a measure of ability to pay in this distribution for.aula�. ,. �Me4�u:ino rel.ativc "need" :.s much more diffieult •: ' because valid m�asu�es of need are more difficult , to find and wi2l v��;� depenc.in� uoun the governmental funetions per`or�;:�d. �ecause of khe diverse functions a..� service� perfo nned by municipalities . • ��-t�vc :.�� is very difficulC to . and co��,.e'_�:s, � < . . �:ea�u�� ia �ny prc=isa �aay. °et it is ar. . , � I i- . � i : i � . ; , � (` ; . _.! . i i ; . � ; � i.. � � - 13 - 2C.C:10iJ10G�o�:.� i 1CL Ll:>t � lri �en�ral, central C1t12S � oecause of i:i�corical� �i1Vg1C«i� d114 SOC131 ; factors, L:llS� Cl2VOt(? Si�:li.ilCFi:i�Ij� iI1Gi2 Y@Vt;Zlll2 per cap�ta °�r mu.�ic�pa7. servicc-.> than suuurban co�a:.r�ni.�.es. CoasGtjliG'r�ly, the cfistribution fornula ior mu�icipali�i�s shoulc reflect this diffe-tence ' in r.ee3s �.nc. ,.:e �est ��-ziiabi� �e<�sure se�::s to be proper.y „a•r,as �.ev:.ed pe: capita for operatin;; exaeases and �e.:era:. bond�u ind�abte�ness. Alt�ough . a sir�il�.r can�•.:.s�: in��r�capitapropeYty taxes . levied does r.ot seer,, to be as aaparent oet:ween urban ar.d rural cou.�ti�s i:: tae .�.et�o�o7.itan area it probably ::<�pr�:��r;t:s �ne best avai�able measure of � reistive neeu TGr cour.tias as caeii. • Apper,cii:� A�inc;:cat�� ho,a $1u.75 miliion taould be ' distribtctad �,�.o:�„ ::u.:icip�aiities irc the metropoli�an area on t. a bas�s o� poaul.a�iar: ;coi.. 3) , and on • t.e bas�s oi two eisCr;.'a-�t�o ;: o�Llc�s :efleccing reiative a��.�cy �o pay a.d ;�eed. Cr, e.. uses only assessed V�.''.L'1i.iOr pe� capitu as o measu�e of ability � to pay (coi. 5) a.�d �.�a other uses both assessed valuatio:: p�r c�n��a und n�rscZal income per cap�ta� - . weiohteci �qual.iy, as �:aeasure o� ability to pay � (col. �). �o�;; o� �'r.e latter �orMUlas were used because i:ica.:,� c?a�a �s av�ilab�C TOY only a Iimited nu;i�er o:: tr.�:i:±ci�:.��iti�s. Appeadi:: E indicates • t30T•7 $v. �� .��i� . :0: �7�3:i..'�G ✓l: G�lu ��'l�Ji;iCd 3t^O:1v �C�@ , . . seve.i COli.^.i;1�.5 "�:? i:�;�J. 'iCi,i0�0�_�t:el : c^.1'C3 Oi. t�iC basis of populat�o :{��,_.. :) a:c, on `he i�.:sis of the_ two ..� , ... i �.� � . I� � i - ; _. ., ;� . _." I � - 14 - ` � othe'r distri�utior. forr.:ulus described anove . (cols. 5 and �)., It should �e clen: that these . � fi�ures are :rAV1::C3 ;:or � lli.tstraCive purnoses only and do not oa-r^o;. t to llYJ'j (°CC the exact_ results of an , .. actual d�str�:�utioa. Ap�endix D describes in specific • � . detail the �e�i:cc,clo�y Lsed in arriving at the figures ' in Appendiccs A, B, ar.d C. e. The distriSi� ;�i: c � t�:e cther L=:I` of t;^.e revenue . ' resultin^_ �ron a �a�tropoiit�.n rross income tax, . a nig?v-b.=�cl�: �s?^s tax ar a�11_levy to school • d::stric�s o:: ttie �,::is o� �he-ir relative need and " a�iiitv to ��v. In tne context of school disC�icts, the two • general�y acce��ed �easures of a'�ility to pay are - assessed•valua�ion per ;�upil unit and personal income � per capita. T:�e � r.atio�ale for their use is the same . as that given a�ove fo� tae distriUutio;� formula for municy�aZi:ies and counties. Insofar as "need" • is concerned, the pup�1 unit is ;;e::araliy recognized • � as a valid measure of need io� school purposes. � . Hoa�ever, the-re is also ge:.eral aoreement that on . the averade ::t cos�s significantly more to educate a � physicaliy o: mentally handicap�ed child or a child , from a povarty or ah��to area than a nornal child from a typical ;�iidule ciass neighbcrhood. Similarly,�it costs more to educate a h�gh school student thal a grade school student or a lcinder�artener and more to provida an �nricaed cu:r�culu� zor talented . stUdents :ha:� to n�ovi'c� or.ly the nor�al acadanic • •' courses. ��:us, ia dis�r�':�uti::;; th� .2ver.ue to � - 15 � . _ � � � school distric�s tie forni:la s;lould include some type � . , of weighted pupil unit figure as a measure of need, - • ( • ' This was done by breakiag tne student population . , ' . o� each sc.zool district down into three categories • and givin� each cateoory a different weight to reflect �. , , its relative cost as follotis: Kindergarteners -.0.5; . Grade School Studer.ts - 1.0; and Higfi School Students - 1.25. In this way we arrived at an , ' adjusted student population �vhich r�ore nearly reflects the financi�l r,eeds or' each district. To this we added a certairL weight ior each handicapped or high cost child in each �chool district as shown below: . Physically EanZicappec? - •. . (includia� hearing, visual, orthopedicaiiy handicapped}-. , , , . +1.0 � . ' • �fentally Handicapped - - Educabie. . . . . . . . . . . . . . -t-0.5 . . � ,Trainable . . . . . . . . . . . . +I.O I . . , . . . _ •Communication Hsndicapped . ; . , Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +0. S � . Speech . . . . . . . . . . . . . +0.5 _ . . . ' Socio-i,conomicali� Handicapped � , Title Z SCudents . . . . . . . . . . +1.0 � ' • � • � ' � . High Abiliey : '. Students in Enriched Courses . . . . +0.5 ' Appendix C indicates how $25 million would be ; • distributed ar�onb mur.icinalities in the metropolitan • area on tt-�e bas:.s oL averaoe daily attendance � • (col. 4) and on the basis of two distribution '• � - � . • formuZas reflectir.s relative auility to pay and �. , " need. Onc UJC�J only �ssessed valuation per pu�il • .i � uaiL�aG a measu��e of ability to pay (col. 6) and the . ' . ;i. • _ � .' ::, , . .� � • �- - 1 . : i - �. � �� i � �. �, I � .' t i. i � - �� ._ —lb— otner usea bo�'� as5essed valuation per pupil unit snd personai i:-:co^e pe�-�capit�, wzighted equally, as. a.measure o� u�ility to pay (co1. 9). Both of the ,; :- latter fo:r,iulss were used because incone data is ' av�ilaSie ior onl, a limited nunoer of school �. districts. As indicateri aoove these figures are � provide:.' .o: iilustrst�ve purroses only and do not. • pur�ort �o pro;ect t'r.e exact r�sults of an actual . distribu�io: . 3. TC AYOV.�.G�P. <^. CO:i:::iT::l'TiC'. c^-:lG� ?iuG?i^i�V i^crea.^-.iII^ i1.Ob7 Of , - ' � ZEVEIIL'C.' �O lOCc i. "�,V�'':I'.,-:.^_`; .� Stli=`?.C7.`L?t 40 .^�inCain ZOCdl __;.•� ^_ __ . services at clesi�-sole ar.c n.:c�ssa_•y 1�vel.s. The revenue ac•�dn of'z:u��icin.>yities, school districts i ' and countiea have ��cn ir.creasing at a relatively rapid rate ; . • �' durin� thz last ttvo dccades. �n part, .his has been,due to i. . infZationary influances. '..ow�ver, there also seems to oe a ; . _ rather persis;.er.� 3ez�.d ox, the part of the public for increases in the variety a7d qua:.ity of se:vices provided at the local j level. As a consecue.ce, sr.y adequate tax progran for � • . � , the financin��of Iocal s�r�zces should ;.r3vide for a�radually '� .� . . i increasin� flow of revenue so tn�.t tne inflationary price �- , increases as ��eli as some ir.creases ir. the levzl of service ' i . . �: � . can be provide3 taiti:out co�.tinuaily incrc2sing the rate of , . � i . • � � taxation, a�d particuiarly tne rates oi property taxation. . { , . � . . � To accomplis:� ti:xs i•re ;�lieve serious con�ideration should . ; , . , i ' be given to divers�i�ia� t:1e so�irces o` revenue available �.. � for providing Ioc:l s�r�rices by the additton of sources . , . „SL1C�: 8S d �J� G't.iu�C' �?.iC i:At: �GY ::ur;7.351: ^� 1LflLt5EiTi1C�i. Sild � . _ • + hotel—r:otel roo:i i8;i. .S�cC�.T..iCF.'.�;F� SJ�? Ya:C0:�1^C:�C! �2'.e fo2:�.a;ai:��: � � i • ' , . ! • �_ � � + . r � ._ �� ' , 1 ; i ,i: ;i �� ;, ,� . ,; � {, ,i i !? f. , ii ;� . , �: � j ;: ;: ;i ;i __ , � ; � , - 17 - _ . a. The enactment of a wheelage tax at the raCe of 50% of the state license fees in the seven-county metropolitan area. Largely because of legislative restrictions which - have been placed upon the use of wheelage taxes and the practical difficulty of administration on a municipal basis, the wheelage tax has not been used as a local source of revenue in Minnesota. However, there is ample justification for such a tax since the motor veh3cle owners are the direcC beneficiaries of l.ocal roads and streets and related traffic services. Furthermore, municipal expenditures for local streets and traffic control have been growing very rapidly during the last decade and wheelage tax revenue could logically be used to meet some of � these needs.and thus relieve the burden on the property tax to some extent. This would also be consistent with the provision in the state Constitution which requires that the revenue from any local wheelage tax be used for road and street purposes. A wheelage tax of 50% of the state license fees would yield approximately $15 million in 1970. b. The enactment of a 3% admission, amusement and hotel- motel room tax in the seven-county metropolitan area. A hotel-motel room tax is normally imposed as a percentage of the rental on sleeping or rooming accommodations in hotels, motels, resorta, apartment hotels or lodging houses: and is usually limited to temporary occupancy designated variously �. �, � i; ! � �. � ;I � i� . f }. , , J�. E' . . ; � . t - � - ( i I � � [ �: � ` � 4 - 18 - ..� , . ..: , , ., . � as anywhere from less than 30 days to le�s than one. ' year. The hotel-motel room tax is justified, in part, on the benefit principle. Specific govern- mental facilities and services in large cities � are provided largely for conventions and conferences, for tourists and for others just. � passing through ' a city. The tax affords a way of se�uring revenue fro� the transient population. Furthermore, such a tax does not burden the poor as they seldom � use these services. Most individuals who travel have the ability to pay the tax and those traveling for business reasons generally have expense , �� -�� - accounts, so'the.tax is passed on to the employer. Admission and amusement taxes are imposed on , such semi-Iuxuries as commercial sports, selected • entertainment events, and amusement activities. ' Generally, cultural and educational events are - exempt.• Such taxes have been appraised by some experts on local government taxes as a r "natural" for municipalities. The items covered fall into a semi-luxury class. The taxes are ' • borne by residents primarily but they also reach '- non-residents who come to the city for entertainment and amusement. The tax •ryie]d for a 3% admi.ssion, . - amusement and hotel-motel room tax would be approximately $3 million in 1970. i r �� _ , � ; � ,. . - 19 -- , _ r , � �c. The clistr.f.biiti.e.^. o•.` *_��o-tnirds of the revenue irom '. the.r::z�ro�otitar. �ahea'•_a;� ta:: and the me�ro�olitan ' ad:�issien, <,:�:usc�n:�at a. Z hoCel-�otel room tax to � municip�.l}ti�s aa3 o._e-tl:ird to couaties on a per-capita basis. • � . The two r„ost practicaZ bases £or distributing �� wheelage tax :ever.ue �aithin the metropolitan area are the place of YG�VaJtl4tion and population. ' ' , While tne placz of reoistration nay seem sonewhat �� more.looical for i:�dividually owned passen�er . . vehicles, it �aould p;.o�ably result in relatively ' large windialls of revenue in ti�ose con-nunities . which happen to be the poi:�t of reoistration for � ; " '.� lar�e fleets of co�nr,iercial or passenger � � vehicles. FSrther^ore, tnese large fleets would • . trtucn more lilcely b� re,a,is�ered in tliose com�-nunities � whieh alrea�y have•signi`icant comnercial and industrial estabiisi.ments than in prinarily residen- �� - � tial con�ur.itics.' � T: ere�ore, it c•rould seem r�re _ , , . equituble �.nd r..ore in kecping with our objective � �, . , Ito distribLte such revanue on a per capita basis . siace this would probably have at least a moderately equalizin;; effect. Appeadix E shows how �15 million in ' wheelaoe �ax reve:�ue �aould be distributed among , � • municipa2'�ies and counties in the metropolitan area � on a per capita basi�. • , ', �The sarie �encr<l. rationale woul.d scem to apply �. to the di�t�i�ution o.` t•l:e revenue froM syadmission, � . ariusea:en*_ :.^.d �o�e'.-�,:c�e' room tax. On this basis . � muzcicipa �: c:ic:: ��ot:I3 +ECi.iVC un�roxi�,:stely $1 per . , capita. . , . .r.•_Z._ . ......_�........ .._.�... .. ....... ... .... .._ ..�. . . . . .. .... . . .. ... . . . . . - . 1 . � . . . � n0 � . . � . .• L � . � � \ . . � . ' � . � 4. To ret�.irn locally shs~�:�` sta�� taxes so as to reflect more ' , Y accura�ely the ct.rren�-.�ec:s of ?ocal �overnr,.ent and the servic2s thav pe--io� .i. ' � . We beli.eve the iocally shared state taxes �oould be of : ,. - , • , mo:e value to loeal gover.-.me.ts and to their constituents if � the following three nod�fications �ae-re adopted: ' 'i. �.' � a. 2eturnir� sha~-�d �-�ties so as to reflect c� . � . I � . • in povuiation r^<<•iltinn fron a�nexations; . ! . b. Adiustin� the c.?.c-n:ar fer re�i;rnin^ shared � ; � , takes so as ::o �ni:'_�rai:se the n�ed fo: tax anticl- � { • • patio� '��':o�•�'r� �y r.�a.~�cipalities at the i� }�e�nr.in? or �`� rz�ena°r vear (i.e., the fiscal � � • �ear for ai � �'J•.` .l _?F7 .�.L'II1Cio..].ities� � Ic. Develo�i:�? a no.':ir_v -a•'*n �espect to return iof snar�d ta::es tc locaZ �overnr�nt which wQuld I reflect t?,? finunci=l neecls of such �units and • � . • ._ . i , . . thegovera:n'at^� ��ices they perform. (These � �, . t G' tnree it�:as ur` included in the Leaoue of f ,2innesota ;:ur.ici lities legislative program.) P�. II � . Specifically, we believe ccr.sideration should be given to sharing i . . Iwith the counties tne oer c4pita distribution of sales � . _ Itax funds ior thut part oi tze �opulation living outside � . of incor�orated areas rat;�er thsn cont�nue the policy of . I t . , i. sharing this revenue with �hc to�•mships. It is quite �' apparent that in ter��s or ur.its o� general, ].ocal govern- ' �: . • + d �u�ti�s are and will continue , � ment, municipaliti�s aa c: . � � � xo be the main source of �ocaZ �over:�ent services and they � ,! _ i , �.�. should '�e t�a esc��s:.ve rec�`.?ients oi loca�ly s�ared state r" '. . � taxes. . i . , , _ . ' � �AAL:par . . • � 12/4/68 � ' � ' o�v��rHxw�r on�� acn►�c��ooy� nroo �oa��wco �r��c nv►too►�r� �'m a� xt �n r►� �w a� r=: �n wo �n w o m rr rr a. � �o n� a �o �n � 7d ro w a p c � w 7�' c� ~ cn�� r�� e c� � m w c� Ko�o m;va�� w o �+nmw�c�oowo H u�o H �eww � �� x�oNNy� n r�o�y �'w www � _ � Nro "tl W (`D � ►C � � ►C �'�i f�D Ual N N ��a- x � %��d oo�' ~ Ol F�+� K r�r � � � � � � r• f-' N ►�' H' ►' �D �--� N N N F+ ►-+ N o�"v+o�r.-�-wrn rnwrw aov�a�vrwv�►�-r �� v � v � o v v v � �. v � v w v � v � v v � rO+N N�Orr-��01� O��O� N�L�p�v V WODIn WL�O�ON�00�--�►-� lrN VC� v� W V Oorvt,n�D pOCi�00�00C�N V tnG��DO ln0�r0�00�VO�r+ ►-+ N r+ r r-� N N N � r � V A O� 1� O O W W l� V � l� n V+ v� W O� r W V r OD �O �D O� W r W W �O N W' O� O d� Y V r V V W � � i� � Q � � Q � � � 0 � i�%� � � VJ O� W O O Oo A Oo O� W O� O� �O N A r-. p� r-� CrJ NN OOOOONO ODOO OOODNOtntn ODN � H i� � � . _. . ._ ----�. � �-- ; ;v � ' Vf r-+ r r r-� r-� r r ....... � �DOO�vOOr-�l,n Ov pvO�C 1�►-��D �. ►+W N V OW r+ i�OJ OODODOI�InN C�y O�tn C�1�01�0� AOD NO00�-+0�►+ I � � ., � � --- --- -. _ _ � _ ...__ .. _ .__.. .. _..-- ; N r �„ G' O� Q� W lr.) OD N V W W � lJ� O�D N ln 00 O � � rO�000�O1nr IJ�N l�O�ODN W ��O c�wwi--i��oo o�ao .+oco:o.��-o wrnrn�or.cv� �w vn,rvri,,,o.� H O�ONOlnN00 ODO IV InONN001V . e . e� � - � - O 1+ 1 1 1-f I 1+ I-}� + t!> Vl ►+h+N�-' N�O� �- 1 �} U�NN►+N 1 C+f rNNOOQ�� NOO �-• W p�Op�pp� (A o . . . .. v v . v . v .. �. v v V OOL�N.L�V 0o ON O V OoO��pr W O N�O.R�� W lnN �O •00�00�'l��! � 1�COO+OOU+ON OOO 1� V pW V 00 � . r 0 r � N N � W v N r N r �n � r-� � �D tJ� � . r � c --_ c � w n W b w � F� r+ � � ►•�►d�� b � � V • pl r'1 fD a 'v m C � a C � �C ,'! � �'�z >4 x fD �.f1 � � � M � � ►J N v z � N � � � '�' fD C fD ."') r+ � C � M v . —� i �� I o� � �� i i o �, � p �� D" ' � A � . > . b , oe ty W w � � W m r�t �� µ t,/� ►h C �l �d W � V 1�-+ O � M 1+ N L� O� v � � O. O � O O O Ki r7 0 0 � � � P � � w � �w a n w rr fD � � 00 �w '� C� fD M+� ".i�, N � fzD 'C7 ' ro o a� F+� "�i a1 a� � M F� fD N � V. 1Y � � 0 b � �Q 0 i ;� o v�cn�zz� r►�a o�cn�ncnxa��voz� xc�e�cadc�e��i �� rr��rroo�uo�wwK� r►w�nrowi�K�oo��ooaamK►tK ►-' ".,l W O •: Cl r'L $ F'd rt F� W �`C O• • G' f� �! O S :1 �'d F� F+� ID N�C O O O t=f � N rt r{ fD rt � i-• tt A N� f0 N H � a' E7 � �� 7 7r C. iy �'d tn O O O h1 ►i 19 N�d C 7' bd W fD !-� O p �'t W f9 E"� 9 F+ rh O O� a fD N F+� N W :J' tT 7C 7�' �~ I C d F+� ri m E fD � A rt S O:J � W� O rt W�� d C+ 0� N M Fw z � H bd !+ C F� f/� W•' O �: O H W O C R(n fD n 'O O'L! N M C F� �y �� O � G fD fD �+ F� tt 00 C O (� pC H C � O W A' LL 1� �' N � O C 0� fD a j � w� � R! O� a w oµo O~o ►C � O. fn �� A. ry�_ !�"''+� N M� �d A � � p� p a� � d� � p' � � 1D x.� p� 1 • � � w � • � � � ►s i • . i• . -------- � i w r � � N ►+{,,,>rr N tn N A rl�r r WO�rNI� Wr W Vi� ! O�O�GV N►�+i�ODW WC�A�O V i�W OOODOOOOFQ�tnO�NODW NOO�W OV ►+ l�W . 1� r Y r r • Y r • Y 1� • V. Y r V � V V M V 1� Y V r Y. Y- � V r •� V r V r V r �a v� �.-� n� v v� v� .- v�� v� r N N�d �O W O� N W tJ A W V i-+ o�o 00 ►.� u+ ►-� �o �n oo a� I V W r0�i��OW OOO�Q�O�O�V NNW rrNNO0U+r000N0�rlJ�W L�NO� NO �O O� OD V� O O� C� W tn W C� W Oo O V�O 00 r O.L� A�C W OD V N O W�O O� �` �O O OD �O ' ---.._.__ .__.__ ..___.___.... ......_. __ .__ _ .....:.._.__. _ --_ __. .. _..—.. _-- — ; i w :� in • N �+Wrr IV l� r.t�r+ r W O�►+Nl� N►r W V j� O�OOOrNrl�ODW WO�� i�W0o0D0ovi�O�V�C�NON NOO�W �D V r W � o�r-�o�cr+ANOWIl�WC� �000.�-r.�roo►r►-�n�r-�.��,+r-�oro�o�o�n � V V • r r Y Y V r� r r r r V � • Y V V Y r Y V V Y r r Y V r V Y V�OOO�OVOOOACTO�`O W O�O�v�DO V��D�O�ON V�DV r�O�WNN l� . � p�,,>►+►+O�C�vOC�00�0� v�O�D.L�rN WvN�1�NV�OO�C�V Or r�O � CDOONOOOOOOO�ONOONN NNNOOInNONlJ�00DOONODN0o00 N { , _'-.•.__... . __ ._ .--'- - . . __ ..._ ... __. _. .. . _ . . ._ . .. _ . r � .___--- � ----__._ - -•r---- . _ -._ • : . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . • . . . . . � p0 OD N 00 �C V O V OD V V V V V V� �D 0� 0� Q� �O 00 V N V V O� V O+ �G �O OD OD ; ' rNOOW��wN�r NOr N0��1�GN W l�W �ODO 00 V� W 00�0 ►�" OO��OOON��NO ��VOC�Ol�O�O�NV G��CO�OOIn�D��D � � � . : _..__.__..__.. _._. ._�------------ __--- W . � � � . tn I ►+ pDN►+r r • W rt�r r NOOrr�N NrN O+ j O� V W O�O�-'0�V NAW W Nlnl�v►+N WAln1�NOO�i`�l�NG1DV 0�O O�N�Nr-+VOODA�O�GW O VOW�DOOVOOL�W r+V NNAWIr�NO�W 00 r �/ r r r 1� Y V • r r V' V V r V V V Y r V Y V V r r r r Y r � W NV O�VN�AVI��D W O�O��NV�DO�0a�0 W l�O�r r.10►-��ON A tr I pNpp�pVwitWi�NOONOtnN N1.QitOtn0o00 V+OOOOOON000000oV+0o00 0� I 1 1 v 1 1 1+ I 1 1 I Vwti�W OO�NOOOOV� W N v v v � � v v v � v r O� W O� N r O� N Q� W p1�V WO�ODO00� V O � . A i� , b v � . F� F+� K ' � . C� � ►+�df►� �00 !+1 O+Ry9� v• � N a ►d bd 7c1 o a � �''' V �C p fp N�} � 7 v p4 �d . 1 � � N � v � N 1 1 FI 1 I I I 1 t 1 I N 1 1� 1 1 1. 1� 1� d r r�+ W W lJ� ►+ N O� N N C� V+ r r-� ►+ 1 N N M � O O O Oo W V� N N V Oo O V+ ln W C� V►r W O� O� • v v v v v � v v v v v . � .ioorv+�i-�ODr-+N00�0 VNO�r�v+i� ao�o N000oN0�O�OrO V OO��OVi AN V+O O O+ pVNV+NV VONVNL�NOi�OVO O � ---- -_�......__�__.. _ ___ _ .— I �-+ . . ~ . . • . �� . . • � . V� V O� W 0� V� 00 OD V 0 � w � N i� V V OD H+ N W w � � �� r o v V ►+ N 1�i� O O '� � , r I ♦ I � t W v �O N �O N � v � � ' � V�,1 N 00 . o� . . �n r v �oo w r �Ni+� N C� V O� V ►r V O� N v v v w v+ o� w i-• o� t!� Ooi O Oo tWi+ N OD Oo tr � r W 00 � � V � � v W r V ♦ r � v � � r O� r O O N O� rro �n �d1 O� .G� V� N ln W ►-' O O V+ O ! I � ' O�iD i� N v • � ►�°-� o v O N V N C N � V ♦ � x � 7d C "� :�+ � W � :� v � cNi �O tNt � O O W �`i � �'H • � a�� m r",v� z m�y M v�rrou, w o c� n ti° o a�w�+ooKy � ��e °±�rm "z° � m ►�t �w�oo o K � � � � � � . 1 � . i i t - i i ( . __ j_.�.__._...._ .._ ....._ + . i � Y V Q � ►.+ y� F,,, W N ln t0 M W Y W O �O O� O� • v v v v v OD 1�OANF-+W W C i� O�O O� V WOO�C��WN O VOD N O� V lr OD V� O 00 �O t� �C W n r�o�,nw�w � , N�ONrO►-�N � � � v v v v � . . ►�+ h�+ �O :.l1 QO d0 Q� � �Q OW NOOOOppN N r r r �OO�NW�� 00 W i�►-+NO�00 1� F+ y W t-� l.n 1� 00 N V+ i� O� OD N r 1� pp V Y �I y � V• � � O � � OOOONOOO p • ►��.. N + f+,,, w � � 1� C� V r O v p� . � � v v��t�owv �, vo�ov+►--o w WO�N�ODI� N � N �D \ O� � � p F� b � w � w �► � � � ff k0 O 9 � � b �1 V • f7 fD a �d Od 7�f !C � C � � a �i v �C d � N�x � � v , � C .+ � � v w � ' d F+ Mf . M �N z � x � e �o a c �o d H rfi s � ; � � ; , - . . ��d�� w rt fD .. � O : � �. C! �C 't7 a► M 00 F; � � O � 0 �C ^ r v !=1 - . W 1� �o r r rt v N O� tn �-+ N {,d r�'d � N� �C OD O �O O� 00 O�'C! �� l� � � V � V CO V.. f�D �'J r .- r •- o• v �,+ a o� b �+ . � � _ _--- __..J _,..---•-_.�____ ____�__.__._.__.._._ -- - � v; N � rf � . . v � ' (/f h+� rt • ' W r r W ln r O� �d bi �1 O F'� 1� W W W A N W O Q� N CJ O W N O� V O� r r 'ti fD tD W G� � • v � r � v v � � �o r . „ .- r .� n� � a � .� a o� � N t�i� O 0�o O O � � O� 1D � CsJ . • O � � — -----._��_..__-•---.-- O►� O � I � Y ~+ ~ � . r � r r • n� -�j- r. C O � W p v � w � � dz � w� • � � �n w o 00 0 � �o >e a, e�► o• � ' m i-i '" rn D' 9 7d .�' r v, �d �' � cn m �-1 � W �+ O W U+' r C� ID r1 fD J r+ U+ l� l,n V• O ln O� rf � I+ C Q• �. N i� V� yV W N N G v 0�0 'J '� , r� � {,l� ' N tJ� O O N V�i � N f�D � . � � O C , '" W 'C1 � t! N F� . ' � �,+ M 7a f7 9d ♦ ♦ 1 -F I' ♦ ♦ M N W td r Oo ' i� l� w W fD r. fD � � Oo N. � O N O � � v O. hq �D i� G� O+ V+ , .L� V+ '.�' 0� O ' Vl �D 11� V V V .L� t0 A � C W OD ln N O', N V fD W J r � — �--------------�-.-�...-- --------- -' --�:------ � W ro �'� rr p r r r r r � � � . . . . • ��, . N � � fY � � F+ O� N tA lI� O N C] v O N N O 00 N O� O N #' � . ' �. z �'4 � ' F+. I � . � _ M n, r . Y Y �� '�/} , W ►+ O A V+ r O� '�tl i� .L� V+ O ►� 1r N fD V� G� V� 1� �D r O rt v v v �', v+ �c � � �o '' N v+ i� OD O ln V� O'. N N + ►++ OD T N ' N ►-' ►fi 1-+ W r+ T V �D ►-' M � � a � v'� v o (D OD O� O� �D W 1� O M r �o v o �o tn v� �o O� ln V� `J O' N O� A ' N , a 1 .�. i � � e �o o w � ai � � �► o�� C/f O W� � C O � � c'� oo w � ►--� �t n r z w��e°�� i r �d F; '� fD bd N d a � E��c�' wwxc� n n w x n � � n o w w o � � � ; ,+ .; ; � ��n�n�a� n n a w � w ►-� � o � Ki Fa-+ � 1�9 W O °� �� z t" � w w � °a�w x°�' ro � �o hb o0 a� � � fr W r r+ r+ ►-� ►-� ►-� r r r �O �D �D �O �O t0 r+ r r ►�+ ►-� �-+ r ►r f-+ V O�A�ONr ►-+ON O�I.nAW N►-� N N A tJ� lJ ►+ W h-+ ln O r+ W J;` t-+ U� V lJ ►�' N V y'i N 1� C+ l� A W ln V�C ln N r+r ln N r+ O V�D oornv►-�wov oov�o� unrnu�vv+�c�o l!� V NAlnln00 0�06�N OQr1�O��- V V ' �tn . r H W Nt-�N W r tv�r W.L�NIn x O� l� r+ W�D O� ln O� O ('� O 6� �O r r-� �, Q�O�O��OOO AInA OAOO.L�V r N Ct1 ln ln O V ln O ln � ln UI� N ln V ln N 000v�oo ov+o v�ou+ov+ H O O O O O O O O O � O O O O O . � C x rh � -- --'— - - ------- � �. �. ..• � � . . . . . . t O r N � O � O �O O A t� N O O� H C'� _. � -- - - - _ . ... _ __ --- H i � W N r� N W �+ W W l� �D O HV� �D r pD tJ� N Crl ln V+0000 � O O O O O O � - � - - . _ ._-- - � I 1 -F- + lO I � tz7 l!� r r � p� � Vf r� ln r p� � � � Q � Q i , rrr� � rrr-+rN � roo rn�w►-rrn V O� OO V l!� V O� 1� W lnNO F!OOO►-�1� V _ -°------.. _. ._._.._ _... _ _ . tn , N ►-� 1`!r t�lnl�r V O� O h1 O� 1� rr ln �O r NO Od00v�N001� NOO OOONInN ln O O G O O ln O V� O O O O O O O O O + i i �F i-/�+�+++ � �lJ lrt Oo � l� 00 rn w r �o .o'�o r v n> Y � � �11 `� V ��J7 �.�i1 �11 0 O O O O O; _ O O O � � x O z� �5 ty cu w m � M w A 1'� z O �. a �� a re m t7 C ►-aw►�t �cw �w rn��eao OD � fD (�D < m � N N I7. � !D C fD � C fD C W P11 ty F� � n K � C K W O � 0 M � N N � .� F'� r � w 0 w � � O rt 0 O � �� rt G M � b � O �jt1 F� M, w r N� K h r• t� � w 00 � ".d A m a' ro � o �r�'t F+ `" e Cy ia � � A �z�► N F'� O. A w m � �1+ � � V9" r'f F-� f�D K bd � •e w � o trn� uw r°n V V � N M w 00 � ' C ^� w N �('+') � � v + a z �* n �o � --- n. w z � �o � c � � �o a f/� :3 �f ."'� tn ►d �S ti Od �y � tn :O 'Z � v� E cn a� :d 7o O Q'.� ��,' SC 4� t=f Cli W bcl Z rt D� o r-� a' n N o to y n o• o t�1 w r* r* o w m rt' o w o o a a K r-� t�f N. �' rt � w N• E n►-� w• �n c�C �•• Q' � �n o, p p�v r w �u o o ro f.•rr�oc� a�'o a r n �* � o c n� N c r� m a� a� p� a�� o o►- � �o v,.►� o n row m o �o ro� � ac� w r�� °°'°� ►w �� w rd��•z ��no b ►t� r�. ww• �no �*o ro ww c� � awrG w� w~� w w� w��o w a , xf°.�N w �,�o�rto � K �' o �o �o r• ti � �o � �� w r• r �t c� o z �o� . � r r£ w�em �' � ��p��w � � � �' ' � � H r E I 0 0 a _ .. .. __ ...._ _ . .. . _ _._ . ..- - ----..- -----........_ .. -------- cn pppppp V V V V V O�O�O�Q�O� NNNNNN�NNrd NNNNNN N rr N r r N N N N N 0� 00 00 00 00 V V V• V V�1 �1 00 V AN� O�O�VQ� l�tnW N►r l�W NrO�D V O�rl�lnW NTr � A � 0 z °� � d � rr n w � r+ z O � .. N � _ .. . n a w • , .. �� de � f,., 1� r r r pp r N r r C� ►-� N 00 C(D W fC � O O��-+NO ►+rr ln �DO�r OrOO 1n0�-+1r�00t�W Vln�OrO►+NOOO �� F�H/�, W V V Y Y V r V � � ��~ w" n� orn�crn r►-•�.-�voor� rn:-�vn,o� :-w.on,rnoo .-��n�-vinw�woorn w�Cao OD O 00 l� W T O� 1`� �O Oo lJ� O A N O V� N C� v�O �I N�O r-� t-� W T l.n W�O O O ln r p� N V V ln V�O V r�D W t1� ln V W O r N W OD v O lr W F` 00 O►-' W W 0� ln O� W �� i,..� .� . .�.. ..� . </i ` • W p�, II 1� �-' r f,, N �..� O� N 00 �! V W V r V V V rrI N V+ ln O� r V r r.L� ',t'f r r-+O OOCV 1n0� 0�0�-'OO� t,nN Wtn Wtnt�rN►-��O�Nln1� fD ��,� t.O�p�r p�rW v� 00000 W V InIWQ�r�pv V V A�O W C � .. v I v v �.� ��. + v v iD 1` V V N V V� tn O N ln �! O V V tr O O V O V� N O N N V N V+ ln N � � tn �n �n ln O O O ln O V+ O� V+ O O O t,n O V+ V+ O V+ V� ln ln O O ln G O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N i i_.. .- -.-_ �-+rr rrrr r rrr ►-+ N�' �O N O N►-� lJ� 00 O N N W�p �p V O W O O O O� �D O� r--' p�O� NOOW T �Ol�A0�00 .rrN r W r-� V W O� V V V tn v v O O O ♦ I �i- r t-� v t.� O O O r N \ O� O� 00 OD 00 V l.l+ C� V lJ� W O� O V Y Y V V �n v tn v ra O ln O V+ V+ O O O O O 1 -F I �- 1 F-+ rv�o�w� N N O V O V+ V+ O �n O O O O O O r rrrr}�►-�r �rr O�00o W O �CpO►-'OD�OOO�OrIn N Oot��l�lnlnr{+OOO�InO�W NNW � O A O� 1� W O� �N V o� rn o� V+ ln ►-� N O� tn N N r II W r 00 l� V V 00 W O� r-� O O� r' N l!i 1� lJ� ln �+ N ln �OlnOOtON A001��00 O W W v VOONr�In r O OG W V W N V W r t0 00 00 O�D �O OD W C� Q� v � N� N N�! V N V O O ln l.n - lJ� N ln V V O V V O pintrl.nV� ln1n0000 OInO�+V+OU+In O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O ' I r N V I++ I FI 1 N I w � I-F O I I� 1+� N 11t N OO O� �-+ r+ W 00 l� V �-i�' ►-� 00 tD N N � ln �-+ ln `-+ A O� r l!i �I r+ �O lJ� W J� V V 00 �I 00 �D V N p l!� V O O ' N N O N V V V N V l.l� O N V N V O O ln O O V+ ln O ln V+ V+ ln ln V+ O O ln ln V+ V+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r N �O N Q� v� v N v v N l� rr O O 00 00 � + r �n V� vv Y V t!� V O ln O O I F+ �'+ r �p '�, O N 00 w o� o 0 00 � � N v � 0 i w V N � O Q� � O l!� 0 0 i � � ir O O . � A ►,' v O N �O 6n r N N N V� v+ v+ O 0 0 0 � i � � i � � � r rn o . 0 0 �+ O O V� O � O O Nlz tn 1 v N i '� f0 C � fD O� � �� G fD C w M N -C}- N A z � fD C � � C � G w M V �- . w _ ,t � `�' �� ,� , ,��.� ;,1 W_ .�-� , L�AGUf 4F ' t�fil%4[�iESOi�A � NiU1�lIC!€'A�.ITl�•S . ; I 314 SOCIAL SCIEt�CES BIDG. iUNIVBRSITY OF MINNESOTA MINNEAPOUS, MINN., SS455 E PHONE: 373-2321 • 379•2322 METROPOLITA�I ScCi ,i _ . � I, t �! � i ION j1] �. 0 Described below is the methodolq'gy for formulae to measure fiscal disparity (one for municipalities and covnties; another for school districts) and to dis- tribute �evenue from a metropolitan tax suurce based upon the disparity f.ormulae� I. M[TPIICIPAL & COU1vTY DISPARITY FO LA � A. Abi].ity to pay is measured hy assessed valuation per capita and personal income per capita ' i, le Assessed va.luation (data �sed were the assessed valuation in 1967 • from the off.ic.e of the Pu �.ic Rxaminer), a. MethodologyL The tota.l assesse_d valuation of the local governmgnt involved (V ) was div'deci hy .*_he �.ocat government �opulation (P ) . to obtain the assesse valuation per. capita. �— _ VL 2 346,13? �= 546.374 ' . PL ,, 48,220 , b. The combined metropoli';t��n �ssc��;s�d V uation (VM) was divided by . the total metropolztan, population (P`) to obtain the metropolitan �ssessed valuation per, capita. � M ' � �M = 1'�.141.636.395 = 670.028 , • P 1.,703,862 c.' The metropolitan asse�sed valuation per capita was divided by the assessed valuation pe� cap.ita :in e.ach indiv.idual jurisdiction to . arrive at a primary i.dicator of. disparity for assessed valuation (V). V = 67 .028 = 1..226 ' � 54 .374 � Note: The figure 1,0 0 represents the merropolitan norm. Those �' numbers above 1,000 i dicate those municipalities, counties and achool districts whic have greater than average needs or ability to pay as the case ma be; tho:�e numUers below 1,000 would repre- sent those government�I jurisdictions which have Iess than average needs or ability to p y. � ��`: v. 0 �� , -2- � �. , � 2. Income per capita. (Data u��a were fro� Sa].es,Management, � June 10, 1968,) �', � �M . a; Methodology. The average;lmetropolitan per ca�ita income (C--) � was div3.ded by the local pler capita income (C ) to obtain the primary indicator of disga�rity for income per capita (C). . � �� M � �'167.27 = .876 - � �L ,3488 - . � 3. Combining ability to pay fac�tors. a, Methodology. The prima�y indicators for assessed valuation and income per capita were �dded together and divided by two to obtain the average prim ry indicator for ability to pay. i1+C = 1�226 + .876 � 1.051 . 2 , 2 Note: In those instanc�s tahere income par capita was not �` , available (in Appendice$ A& C) only asse�sed valuation was used.3 B. Nged____(Data used were_ from_ the. ffice of the Public Examiner.) Need is __ . ---- measured by the general fund 1 vy and principal - an.d interest on general obligation bond. � '� 1. Methodclogy. LThe municipa� tax levy (NL) is divided by the local population (P ) to obtain �he lecal tax levy per capita. NI' = 11�86,597 = 28,775 • pL 48,220 2. The appropriate metropolit�n tax levy (N ) is divided by the.appropriate metropolitan population (P }to obtain the metropolitan tax levy per capita. . ', . NM = 95,ISO4,393 = 56.055 , PM 1,''703,8b2 . � 3. The local tax levy per capjita�is divided by the metropolitan tax levy � per capita giving a primar,y indicator of disparity within the area .. of municipal or county ne�'d (N). ! - N = 28�77�5 = �513 ' S6.0$5 C. Combining ability to pay and rleed factors. ' ' The primary indicators for abi'Flity to pay and need are added together and � � divided by two to obtain the �easure of disparity. . ' ( C + Vl�',N r. ` 2 / = 1.051 + .513 � .782 2 I 2 _ � . � ' . , , � '' . " .. j-_ . ' _ __ ', ___..___•.._.. .. �, . • • � , i � � , 'I -3- , ` I� II.. SCHJ�?L DISTRICi D-iSi'AiLITX F:1'2r:ti�, i, ':i _____...�...._._...�.. . �..______, (Note: A11 in�ormation fro�n Stacc� Department of Education.) . ;; , I �� ; A. Abilit� to paye � ;, ,. � 1. Assessed valuatione . ;i i( ' a. Methodology� The tot�l assessed valuation of the school � district (V ) was d�v�ded by the scliool district average ydaily attendance (P )'Ito obtain the assessed valuation per ':� capita. ', . VL = 15'' 683 580 =$ 7,340.20 • ' PL ^I20,801 . � b. Th� combined metropol�tan school district assessed valuation ' (V ) was divided by t e tot�l metropolitan school•district � � average daily attenda�ice (F ) to obtain the metropolitan � assessed valuation pe� capita. �VM�= 3,�37,787 145 = $10,652�02 ' �PM� I 360,287 i • ' � c. The metropolitan asse�sed valuation per capita was divided by the assessed valua�ion in each school district to arrive at a primary indicato� of disparity for assessed valuation (V). V_1062.02 1.,.451 7,3,0.20 2. Income per capita. �, � a. Methodology� The ave�age metropolitan per ca�ita income (CM) was divided by the lo�al per capita income (C ) to obtain the , primary indicator of �lisparity for personal income. _ (CM) I' 3167.27 � � 3y253.00 = .939 ��L) � 3. Combining ability to pay �factors. , � a. Methodology. The pzi�nary indicators for assessed valuation and ' income per capita wer� added together and divided by two to obtain�the averaQe nr�imar�� indicator for ability to pay. V + C 2 Note: In those sch not available, only + .939 ; 1.195 2 districts where income per capita was essed valuation was used.) � B. Need. ', � 1.The formula'includes a weighte�l pupil unit figure as a measure of need. This was done by breaking the tudent population of each school district down into three ca.tegories and giving each category a different weight to reflect its r.elative cost a follows: Kindezgazteners- 0.5; Grade " School Students - 1.0; and Hig�► School Students - 1.25. In this way � � � . . , ,:;. . � ., i __ . � � i . C. , . _ _ _ - _ _ �.�: ' � �,.., � � � . . . n � �� + we arrived at an �:djusted st�.;�ant population which more nearly reflects the financial needs of eacii d�strict. To this we added a certain weight for each handicapped or hign �ost child in each school district as shown below: ' I Physically Handicapped ' {including hearing, vis�al, orthopedically handicapped) .... +1.0 ' • Mental.ly Handicapped , Educable . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .+0.5 . Trainable . . . a . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .+1.0 Com.munication Handicappedl - Reading . . . e . . . �, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .+0.5 Speech . . . , e . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . .• . . . . .+0.5 , Socio-Economically Handic�pped Title I Students � . . . , . . . . . . . . . � . . . . .+1.0 High Ability ', Students in Enriched CoU�rses . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ..+0.5 Thus, a grade school student �rith an orthopedic handicap would be weighted 2.0; the same student who a1sQ had a speech handicap would be weighted 2.5, etc. 2. Methodologye How to arriveiat total weighted pupil units. a. The total �' weighted pup'�5.1 units in each district (NL) is divided by the average daily a�ttendance in the district (PL) to obtain the lacal need ratio. '' L • N - 26 21 = 1.270 � - _ PL 20,'�Ol . . ; . . b. The weighted pupil uni�ts in all districts (NM) is divided by the average daily attendan�e in all districts (P ) to ob�tain the � metropol3tan need ratio: for school districts. IVM _ 465 78 � 1.2927 PM 360,287 . c. The local need ratio i; divided by the metropolitan need ratio giving a primary indic�tor of disparity wikhin the area of , � school district need (�i). � N = 1.270'�= .982 � 1.292791 ; : CombininQ abi�itv to pay and n�ed factors. , The primary indicators for ability to pay and need are added together and divided by two to obtain tt�e measure of disparity. � .� V + C ' . 2 + � = 1.195 + .982 = 1.088 � 2 2 � � � _ ' ; -_. ; . t I --5— , , � Y3:�T. :,�'.r...I`,.�...�' C_ :.;_ �. i_�. '� .,. �'i; s` "'2M�':�;1:�t:i•i FGb:�iflT,A Piu:.".'tviioiC�nj�, �ii:: _ ; rt,�.,.':.C=-_ _., _.. �,r,tr-_ :) • t�. 7,OCc1.�. i! io�J ?�L� ti� ._�(>� *-� i.� .;il �CCVi.11. ,;11r?;.ii21S:iO[7 .h � . , . �t,L x 4a,?;o -- ��, f�:,� �:.4uai: ; :L�c�� L <. i_; �::�.� �.:c ;,c��;?_.. _ ..cn � t.'ie �.Q;'.. i� .' �'_ i.:� �� ..' ? "'.' _ tl.'"T. ,_;3i1 Y O�� ui:'.i.Z'L> pO�U.� SC.'..ul.l 37,70�� z;r.��x .:��1 i..:•t ��-,,_t ,.i�.0�2 ~�UC �?°t ��?:li. 5�2,=ait? Uf x�.^..1'r'.[1�10� ' -• .�Zi�49 �.,r�76,459 � �". �' __. -.�?:'_ �'r�a�'e �;t. �...:tt�,_ (�:i:� :�) L'c�t�+1. zev��ve -- ].or..�l. s11a.�e �.; :��:�n�c .022�9 r ;;I6,;�G,r,:�0 - S�?i��i08 Di1T1: n;d � 12-6-6�� , ' �� Fire Phone 560- I I► 0 ' �rid�� F��°� �p��ent , `e�{omE of �ntevzati,orza�' �LzCfo�m. �a¢�zln9 of �nva�'i.c�'s �{omes„ G431 University Avenue N. E., Fridley . MINNEAPO�.IS 21, MINN. , Memo to: ' F rom , Subject: ' Date . Homer Ankrum, City Manager, an�i the City Council Robert S. Hughes, Fire Chief Request change in 1g69 Budget January 16, 1969 , Request change in Ig6g Budget as follows: ' � ' r The financial portion of the Fire Depa�-tment Budget indicates in "Other Expenses" $646.00 for bathroom fixtu�-es and under "Capital Outlay" $600.00 for ceramic tile in the batl�rooms, or a total of $1,246.00. '�, With funds accrued from savings in oth�r areas, we were able to complete the work on the bathrooms and ther�fore, these expenditures will not be made in 1969. , We need to do a minimum of worl< to pre�are the Fire Department quarters for "sleep in" people, and in our nfinanced portion of the budget, we have indicated the cost of thesel,items. The Department requests that the following work be authorized for , completion this year and moved from 'Unfinanc�ed' portion of the budget to 'Financed' portion of the budget. The chan�e will invotve the same amount of funds as is currently authorized �nd will not necessitate any increase in budget but only change in progr�m. ' The fo,i.lowing work will be done in lg6g if �he ro ram is authorized; P 9 ' Installation of wall in old council'chambers with $ 750.00 a 3 foot door, including painting o� wall. 1 Rewiring overhead lights and additidnal outlets 294.00 Total $ 1,044.00 RSH:et ' �_ _J � � Bus. Phone 560-3450 �� . � Memo To: The City Council and Hom�r R. Ankrum, City Manager From , Robert S. Hughes, Chief; Fire Department Subject; Approval of Officers ofl��Department for 1969 Date . January 10, 1968 I The following men were elected offiCers of the Volunteer Fire Department for the year lg6g• '�, Arthur Olson AssistantliChief LeRoy Blomster AssistantllChief RSHoet Lawrence Peka Captain ', Dennis Oftem Captain ' '� Merle Longerbone Captain ', Donald Carrigan Secretary ' Richard Kremer Trustee -� year term Chief Hughes appointed Rober�t Aldrich as Chief of the Fire Prevention Bureau. ' Chief Robert Aldrich appoint�d Edward Ellis as �ssistant Chief of the Fire Prevention!,Bureau. ; � - � �� , �� U �a`!9►� tJVU+�s � � H 314 Soeial Sei�nps �uildinq Univ�►sify of Minn��oto � � e./i'�� . . . . Td�on�, 612/S73-Y321 AAlemapelia, AAinmwlo SS433 To: Member Municipalities of the Anoka�County Association uf Municipalities The enclo�ed 1969 Budget for the Anoka Cdunty Association of M,inicipalities hds been approved by the Board of Directo�rs and general membership of the A�sociat�on at its last meeting December�,l8, 1968. This letter is to advise each member municipality of its share of'the 1969 dues resulting f'rom that Budget. �� . . As a result of the hiring of a full-timelExecutive Secretary a�d other fore- se�able expense increases, there has beer� a+� #r►��^ease in dues �ver those in 1968. In accordance with the by-laws of 'Ithe Association, any such increase �s to be met by increasing each member's�dues (over the $100 flat rate) in proportion to each municipalit,y's assess�',d evaluation. Being computed in this manner, the 1969 dues for each membeir is as follows: Anoka �293.88 �illtop �109.64 Blaine $253.34 Liexington �l1fi,67 Columbia Hts. $416.24 L'�ino Ldkes �127.14 Coon R�pids $379,03 S'�pring Lake Park �154.50 Fridley $54$0l] ' Would you please make your check payable I,to the Anoka County Associ�tion of Municipalities and mail it to the Secreta;�ry-Treasur�r Ra1ph M. L'Allitr� Route 1. Hugo, Minnesote 55038. ' Respectfully submitted, ' �"_� . I . l� ' Stephe T. Refsell ' . Executive Secretary ', STR:sIw ', Encl. ' a � �3 ! ANOKA COUNTY ASSOCIAT 1969 Revenues: 1968 Bank Balance 1969 Dues (Flat Rate) 1969 Dues (Assessed Percent) Total Revenue Available for 1969 Exvenses: Exec. Sec. Sal. (9 months) Clerical Mailing and Supplies Legislative Dinner Total Expense for 1969 . OF I�I[JNICIPALITIES � ,et � $ 848.39 900.00 1,497.61 $2,646.00 225.00 225.00 150.00 $3,246.00 $3,246.00 �� ANORA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES 1968`Balance Sheet Revenues� 1967 Bank Balance 1967 Dues Paid Late 1968 Dues Paid Total Reveuue Avallable Expenses: Expenses Paid Cleric�l and Supplies (1/1-5/21) Clerical and Supplies (9/23--10/31) Exec. Sec. Sal. (9/23-�10/31) Tota1 Expenses Paid Eepenses Outstanding Cleri�al and Supplies (5/21•�9/22) Clerical and Suppliea (].1/1�11/31) Lettarhaad Bacec. Sac. Sal. (11/1-11/31) Total Expenses Outstaading Expenass for Rmainder of 1968 (eet.) Clerical aad Supplies (12/1�12/31) Envelopes Exec. Sec. Sal. Total Expeases for Remainder of 1968 Reeerve Total Expen�ea I $ 978.36 200.00 1,000_ 00 $123.39 23.21 37� $ 78.58 36.77 48.41 29.._. �_�. $520.76 $457.76 $ 25.00 32.45 294.00 w� $351.45 � � 848.39 $2,178.36 $2,178.36 �� i M�mber Anoka Dlaine Columbis Heights Cooa Raplda Fridleq Hilltop Lexington Lino Lakes Spriag Lake Park Totals MEMBER MUNICIPALITY DUES FOR 1969 Asassaed * Evaluation $8,530}500 � 6,747,000 13,914,000 12,277,500 19,716,500 425,000 689,500 1,194,500 2,398;000� $65,892,500 Percent of Total Dues at Dues at Evaluatioa Aasessed Rate Flat Rate 12,946X $ 193.88 $100 10.239x 153.34 100 21.lIbX 316.24 100 18.632X 279.03 100 29.922X 448.11 100 .644X 9:64 100 1.046X 16.67 100 1.812X 27.14 100 3. 6�9X -�,! 54� 50 y100 99.996X $1,497.61 $900 * Figures obtained�from Anoka County �taaas#a�ioa (Rounded �off to nearest $500) � �.�,f,L�— Total Dues $ 293.88 253.34 416.24 379.03 "548.11 109.64 116.67 127.14 15� $2,397.61 .`� � � (I' � , 1 r I ;` j I l.€� . � /� ::._ �� . � , :. �, J /' � �,� 1� 0 , { ,. .� ::� �y � � " ' ,% i� . �` f j,, ; a., ,l�-�t �� , u: / � �� e+�a � � / t'. Ey'� ll � . �1 � � tL �� .� � '.; ' z�: t�'� ��. � � �., F� � � j !'r" ; � e� �� 4�. . �. . i ' : , a . f �. _ l,� ,�` ., S';J-�� /' . — /� -°� _�. .. . �: , �;...,- .-.;.- ;, . . �: -.. ,. : �� , � � : .,, , . , � ' , , -' I • . _ _ . _. � .. " . -__ . __ _..._. _. [ I . . _ . ,. . . . � i ._ . � _ _ � _ . . . -z- .. . _ . - �.�.� . .'__ _ . _. . . . . .. • , .._ . . , , , � - _ . . J.O.^1� I. .. .�. . _ �'�,, � f , . . _ _ . ..1. , .. : t'_ . '- . . - � 7✓ f � � r .� ." ' . t .. ... ('; 's-.j ..? � �r �,� �`! s , � ' ~~'{ � .�.� �::? i�i i 11' i � i � �� . ., ,.- ! , ' � ; � ` � j ' � � � j �ti: ! " " �; � � �{.�' y , . � `r �"1 _'T � \ � �� ;� 1 ,'i � i jjj i � � ..� � 1 � _ . _ !.-'�� \ } _ c„� t, � � IJ � . � _ . _ ' � , . �. � � j� �:y. ,,. ,� ; _ ,;: � � . - . ; �,. , � ;� �r. -_ �. �.S <:� � . . : _ v . ! \;; , . •` t Y� . , ' � j � � , � } � r, - _ - � ---y' - - .. , ..._ - - �_ --- --. _ _ _ , � . : .. � � . , ;� - , . , - ,Q,• . � . �; � , , . . .. - - . ' " � � -% � ;i f` - - �� 1�` ._'y � � � s � � 3710 '' ` � -�/ *;� , , - ' r�..rr,y ,cc:_ ! �-,� n . ,, � , , � ^�. ' . �, 3�a� ' r - 3 _ � . . ,' �.z ��_. . ,s%� � � � .�y ' - �' , � L�� / I � I � I ' ' / .,- / � . •�. . _._. ' e... _ / ' . rr .. �; � .' j ' .. _ , ; �__ __- �_.._� � _ •..3 �:: . � �--- / : �r.=. tl.. il ' \(�� ' : f'� , � � .,1 � �/ aQ . �y� . . . � � �� a�- � .� 1 i) ., (' � • � . 1 ��. _ . o: . _ .' . _ y " ^ _ _ .., . . .� J � ,. I ..' �..,.� . 'y .. . � - � � r� .. . . � ; , --- i , _ �'� a.:.. . - �� a , � y �� i . a :, %� °• � i.; � �•�:. /:: -. � ,- �' . . 3.��... 1 .,...,. .r....� .... , .. , . ...._� . . " .. , , . '. -' � .�. .. - � � . ._ ., , . _ ; o " _ _ . . . } 1 ".�. � . _ . . h ,.. ..�.-1. ( � . _. . . .. -.Y.._ �..... . ._, �. - t . , e. , � __`-__-_ ' . .. .. . . y , " \ � ... �S � � �.�� - I � �� - ." .; _ .�,,. .-.,�.�..�_ ..�.-..... ' ',,,� �.. .� �t .�v.,e.�..�....�...�..��-� .71 ,-�.s, .. . : �� ,-�- r iS GF �: �.; , � �`�,i . � � . ♦: ` ;ii:' • tr • ,t'-'i ",>< '_� � .. .. ti �' _�:" --- ----------- ---1:'._�__ __L n �� I■ r � � , ' P�ANNING G�ISSION MEETING JANUARY 8, 1969 52 �� RO'L� L : The meeting was called to order by Chairman Erickson at 7:�5 P.M. Members Present: Myhra, Mittelstadt, Erickson, Jensen, Fitzpatrick Others Present: Engineering Assistant Darrel Clark APPROVE PLANNING COINNIISSION MINUTES : DECE[�BER 12, 1968 : MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Plann�tlg Commission minutes of Aecember 12, 1968 be approved. Upon a voice vote, all voting ay�, the motioa carried unanimously. RECEIVE PARKS & RECREATION COMNIISSION MINUTES: DECII�ER 16, 1968: ..,_�_�._. — ' kI0TI0N by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Cam�ission xeceive the Parks & Recreation Couanission minutes of December 16, 1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � R�C�IV� BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: DECII�ER 18, 1968: � MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Comnission x'eceive the Board of Appeals minutes of December 18, 1968. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carxied unani.�pously. � r � ' L� � � � u 1. PUBLIC MEETING• HYDE PARK ADDITION REZONING STUI7Y BY NASON, WEHRMAN. KNIGHT AND CHAPMAN, INC. The representatives from the planning firm were William Chapman and Michael Murphy. The Chairnian gave a brief run down of the problem by saying that many months ago the Planning Commnission realized they had an area of some 80 acres bettaeen Main Street and University, 57th Avenue on the South and 61st Avenue on North which was presently zoned R-2 permitting two family dwellings. In this area th�re ar� uses of Industrial, Conanercial, Multiple, Single Fami.ly and, he thought, a�.mos:k no two family dwellings. Under the old meaning of the R-2 Ordinance, there was p�rmitted certain types of multiple dwellings and that is what �you have a great d�al of down there now. They felt an area that large of two family dwellings was p�obably improper, and because they were just plain citizens, just like the people pxesent„ they needed help to know what dec,ision should be made for the rezoning x�y,u4eta that axe continual�y caming up in that area. They requested, some months ago, that the City Council hire a professional planner to make a study of the axea ar�d �o see if they could come up with some reca�aendations for the Goae�nissio� to �t�e, and the City entered into a cor�tract with Nason, Wehrman, Knight & Chap�an, ��nc. The Planning Coamnission had not given them any direct advice; they were left w�.th at� open mind to consider every type of possibility. This me�tiug definitely wae x�ot a xezoni.ng hearing. Mr. Chapman explained that they had b�en working with the Platuning Commission �nd their conc�rn has been to develop a guideline plan fox the development of the � � ' � L_� 'I � � ' � � � r � ' � � ' r ' r J� P1,a�?,i Cammission Meetin - Janua 8 1969 Pa e 2 o£ th� area which could be utilized by the Planning Comaission in the future. Tb,eir intent is not to discriminafie against anything, but to improve the �xea to the benefit of the area xesidents and to the area at large. They �natde planned studies - no engineering atudies - of the area, what exists, what problems are thexe, what they could expect to happen over a period of time. Their thinking, to some extent at this point, is how it will grow over a period of time and what they feel would develop over a period of ti.me. Mr. Mike Murphy was asked to discuss this. Mx. Murphy used the projector to exhibit the maps. Map #1 showed the zo�in$ af the Hyde Park area and im�nediate surrounding area, but did not cross over T.H. �47 to the East. As the map indicates, an industrial district is si.tuated between two residential areas -- Hyde Park to the east and anpthex x�sidential area lying along the river to the west. The circulation of txaffic was discussed. It was'noted that residential streets would carry cammercial and industrial traffic as both of these uses require traffic which would co�me on the streets im�ediately adjacent to co�nnercish�i iadue- trial, creating a traffic hazard. Map #r,� was a circulation map n8 main routes being Main Street, 61st Avenue and 57th Avenue. The indications are that the present circulation system will be inadequate to sufficiently sexve any of the three uses to which it will be put. Such traffic will be a h&zard to children and pedestrians. k(,ap �k3 is the Existing Land Use Plan, and this showed the size of the building structures. Mr. Miurphy continued that the point to be considered here was that those houses which are in the lower range of square footage will soon become inadequate. It was noted that apartments have repl,aced previously built houses. The small houses will probably go first and if that happens, they will go to a*+artment buildings. �.'he apartments account for about 30% of the structures :�,1 the residential area of Hyde Park and houses are about 60% of the families.One thing to be considered are the children from the apartments. It is not likely the apartments wi11 over- load the schoola, but playgrounc�� are needed for the children because they do nat have yards of their own and are playing in the neighbor's yard or in the street. Based on this look at the area, several recommendations can be reached at this point. This is an area that has been previously dominated by single family dwellings and are now switching to apartments. If this happens, it must either be encouraged or discouraged altogether. Because of the North-South access, it is an ideal location for apartments or town- houses. You should try to encourage the most satisfactory development. Other considerations are handling of traffic that is in conflict, sueh as coaQaercial traffic. Referring to the three coBmercial settlements on 3rd Street, Mr. Murphy said there is no access for them fram Highway �47 and since the only a�cess for these 3 commercial settlements is through the residential area itself, the recommendation is that these three not be allowed to develop further. We also where in the tion where, included in our proposals the need for a park to be located sc�me- study area. We tried to locate it near the center and in a loca- at the present time, there are no buildings. We have prepared and have with us three plans in which we have tried to it�dicate solutions and provided what we feel is best for the pxoper develop- ' ment of your area. � � �� I i � ' ' � � ' � � ' � LJ C� � u J� p1 i.x� Co �.ssion Mee�tin - Janua 8 1969 Pa � 3 ��cheme A: Theitraffic signal on bniv,ersity Avenue has been changed from the �.x�tersection at 57th Avenue to 57th Place. The advantage of this is commer- ci�l on both sides of �he str.eet and permit the development of lot depths ne��ssary for appropriate commercial frontage. The diagonal crosswalks on 60th Avenue at 2nd and 2� Streets would block traffic coming into the area and form a loop that would prevent traffic entirely through the residential area. North of 61st Avenue are single family residences. In order to prevent damage to property values as a result of an abrupt change in land use, it is recom- mended that the northernportion of Hyde Park, lying �enerally between 60th and 61st Avenues be held in predominantly single family use, belaw this as we go South from 60th, we start out with two or three family dwellings, then to higher density multiples adjacent to the commercial along 57th and 57th Place. Scheme B: The traffic remains the same at 57th Avenue, without relocating of traffic signal and the commercial the same as in Scheme A. A possible Park Site�: i��I;u.�les 2� ��eet and 3rd �treet. ,.. It�, �:s �1mQst �wo acre�, generally u�dev�lm�ie�1 tait}�' th� ,;exception of th�e� �hou��., *�'� "�!�uld'be ppss3.b1Q to buy them and'leav� a relatively large area free`�or �he,�,p'layground: fihe diagoaal crosswalk� are in the same place as Scheme A. Scheme C: 57th Place would eventually'be vacated as a through street az�d converted into a service drive at the rear of the coma►ercial development. It would then be necessary that no further residential development be allowed to occux with frontage on it. 59th Avenue has been vacated and vacant land tp be acquired for a park. Second Street and 2� Street would end in cul de saca 4n �ither side of the park. Mr. Chapman added, that as you see, we have reviewed essentially a �twelve block area, barely 3� blocks wide, bounded by a major thoroughfare on the East with no access on University Avenue, a potential industrial area on the West, coc�unercial activities on the South. What we have is a small neighbarhood which we Tmust do everything possible to improve. Our coricera was about the existance of small coaenercial places within the area, concern for traffic, tnajor concern is the continual possibility of industrial traff�c produced by the land to the W�st. It could be adverse to the community if noz properly handled. Chairman Erickson, at this point, asked for the opinion of the people. • Ha7cl.ow E. Kinney, 5841 2� St.: T have lived there for quite awhile. If they pu� i� this park (Scheme "C") I will need to get a helicopter to get out of �y yaxd. Now to get to University, I have to go to Main Street if I want fio go South. I have to go down 3rd Street ro go North, go around a dozea c�xal� ta get to Holly Shopping Center. Jack 0. Kirkham, Mayor: Asked if the surrounding areas had been studied a7�d imtestigated, such as the Northern Pacific Railroad track, the Great No7rthexn. Txack, East River Road, but there was no indication what was going on across T.H, �F�+7. We do have com�nercial development here (West side of Univer- �i,ty). It seems quite evident that residential development has been proposed i� a11 of the Schemes,but it has ber� residential for a long time and nothing 1��s happened. Op North on Highway #47, South of Osborne Road there is now p�opos�d a cou�nercial development. It developed after it had been changed to coiaaexcial. , '� � � � � � . ., �� . ,._ i _� . �. i. �. . . � . .. _.. l�.M r. l� . ,�A ' � � � � ✓ �� P1a�z�r�i�,,� Com�nission Meetin�=Januarv 8, 1968 Page 4 ��.�� Azao�hex �hing aot considered, one of the strongest motivating factors w�a the fact� that most of the people ia this itnnedi,ate area were asking for and i�iterested in commercial zoning. It might be possible commercial there would not be good, but I would like to see some proposals showing what would happen i� co�ercial were there. To get access to the commercial area, there could be a slip off ramp oa 61st, the diagonal crosswalk �ould be used, and ccm�tercial could be from 60th Avenue South on 3rd Street. It is hard for the people who have co�nercial developments here to watch successful couaaercial ent�rpxises being developed across University Avenue. Mayor Kirkham would like to recotmnend a completion of the planning study. � It d�d not seem to him we have accomplished what we set out to do. He felt we asked for a professional planner to come in and show us the best use of tl�e land here. Since it was the desire of so many people to want co�ercial, h� would like to see at least a proposal of what a commercial development , would do and what it wouldn't do. Wherever separation is needed between aomm�xcial and exis�ing multiple, we could use the diagonal crosswalk to separate �his and then keep the cam�nercial traffic in couanercial area as � shown in the Schemes. The assignment has not been completed. We need more study. ' Mr. Chapman answered that he would like to take up the point of the cottpmerci,al development. They had considexed co�nercial, but tbe exhibit doea not show a strip of com�nercial on the East side backing up to a good � xesidential neighboxhood. One of the problems extending out �rom Minneapolis �,� a strip of couanercial development facility. Some axe not too good. They do have a tax return and have, for the owner, in the change from residential to cowunercial, a possibility of valuation. Some commercial strips in Minn�a�- � polis which extend out Central Avenue are � block wide, but they have produced pxablems ior the cou�unities. The width of the conunercial strip East of $ighway ��47 is substantially wider thau what could be produced between the � ��.ghway and 3rd Stxeet. It is especially narrow and we feel it is msuch too x�axr�+► to serve commexcial. He did not have the market information to show �h� �eed �'or that much more cot@nercial in this area at this time. If we are � g9ing to remove the residential to allow comaercial, two shallow blocks of width fox residential surrounded on two sides by comm�ercial and one side i�dus��ial, I would say would not be good. � � � � ' � � Mr. Murphy said that the reason there is no co�ercial on the West s�de Q� I�wy. ��+7, but on the East side, is that there is very little relationship acxass the highway. There might be similar uses, but they won't be uses that are xe7.ated with a direct connection. They don't affect one another. �ldon Schmedeke, 5900 University Ave. N.E.: He stated he was a prop rty qw�ex' in the counnercial area for twenty years. On this narrow strip you ay cc►mm�rc�.al can't exist long. It is hard to prove to me. The planner's m�p daes�'t show his complete area as he owns three lots instead of two indicated aT� �h�ir map. He said he had drawn up maps he intended to give to the Planning CAmmi.ssion which show a slip off going in on 60th, crosswalk and diagonal, 59t11 is open. This plan would not bother the residential North of 60th Ave. Mo&C o� the res�dents object to the paxk as shown in the Schemes, but would like xh� City to buy the industxial �and now before it goes sky high fox a gAad gized park. , , ' u r �� g��x�g �t��niasion Meeting � Jan. 8, 1969 Page 5 �'i�'s, Floyd �radley, owner of apartments at 5900, 5908, 5916 2� Street: 8�e ��t�.d they have apartments down there and would like to know just exactly wh�x� the park will be. A neighbor said it would take the first apartment buildi�g. We have been there six years and taxes have increased. Would be glad to sell right now. ,jsnsen infoxzned her the plan would not affect her buildings. Ck�ai.�nan Eri�kson again informed the people that this is not a rezonia$ ' h�ari�g, The �dea behind.the planner's presentation is to try and establiah ,� p�ttex't� of development and a pattern that Che City can li$ten to as far �s a rezo�ning pattern is concerned. There is no plan to demoli�h any�h�.ng. , Mrs. Donald Crooks, 5910 2nd St.: Sj�e asked Plan C to be shown on the projec�or. She said she lived on the Nort�i side, 59th and 2nd street and on the 16�f� s�de af 2nd �treet on the corner. Your map does not show our , property as it is. We have an exit from our property onto 59th from our �,axa$e. You have our house smaller than all the surrounding houses which is npt the case. - , , � � , r ' , � L. , ' Mr. Murphy explained these maps do not necessarily indicate the outlay. Mrs. �rooks said she felt somet�,mes these �lans are put up that way to 1A�ke� the houses look chiriC�y. Again Mr. Murphy trl.ed �o assure hex that they were not trying to shave o�f the val.ue of any of the houses. Mrs. Crooks continued that hex house has been shown as having smaller floox space thaz� she actually has and then the plan shows that 59th Aven�te wauld be taken away so that they wouldn't be able to get out of theix property. ' Mr. Murphy said �hat this is �aot a plan but a Scheme being presented. �'k�,e r�ason why three Schemes were made up rather than one was to �ive you th� ck�oiae of alternate that could be enacted in your neighborhoad if you agxeed w3.�h it, These three,they feel,were acceptable as far as their basic goals wsxe eo�cerned. I�rs. Crooks: About University and the Co�ercial there, I still can'� u�derstand why those peop�.e were not given a service road along Universi�y �� th� time of the Highway. They te11 me they ran out of land. That does nqt tn$ke sense to me. When the plans were being made, why can't they tnalte � se7rvice �road along Universi.ty. I+'�r. Murphy replied that there was not adequate room for a service d�ive. �H� re��rred to �h� map). 1 R,ogex Berggxen, 5821 2nd St.: I am wo�dering �bout the use of the �ark i� th�.s area. The study is mainly of apartment buildings and the childr��n �hex�. � think most of them are pxe-school. In my apartment, by the time k'�e�r c�i,�dren axe grown up, they move out and into homes. We have a park �,�t �he Sylvan Hills axea. In the last park bond issue, they planned buying 1�,r�d ox� the cox'ner of Main Street and 61st Avenue in �he industrial area. � dot�'t �Cnow how many children are in the area now, but I think the children 1'� the �par�me�ta when they are older, will not be using the park. C� ' �� , ' �� P1a�,i,,,x�ti.xtQ Coumission MeetinQ - Januarv 8, 1969 PaRe 6 Mr. Murphy added that if there were many apartments in the area, it would be expectecl there would be children and that there would be a rather high number of small children, an average of one child per apartment. Chairman Exicksora a�ked the opinion of the get�era� aaad��a��e as to whethex or not a park ia needed ia� tha,+� �s�a. Mr. Roger Berggren said that the ownere of multiple drtelliags ir� this day and age are tryiag to diecourage people with children. Councilman Liebl, Third Ward: (Standing at projector) I do agree ' paxtially with Mayor Kirkham. This area between 61st and 5ith -- I am your counciltnan and represent you at the council table and it is my opinion that we should have no rezoning from 61st to 60th at all. This is a vexy weli , establi�hed residential R-1 area with a couple of e.�cceptions -- two double bungalows and a nice apartment building. A lot of people have called me and indicated that they are willing to go along for a commercial rezoning if they can get enough money for the land to sell out and they could build a ' house somewhere else. They indicated to me that they would like to see, from the middle of the block all the way down 2� Street, rezoned coaenercial just like the mayor indicated. ' ' ' He continued that he was not too impressed with all three Schemes, l�ut he did not criticize the Schemes as he realizes a lot of time was spent on . them. We already have got a lot of apartment houses which are in bad shape and the streets are not in good shape either. The people South of 60th Aveaue are ready, and I think the petition indicated they are willing to go co�ner- cial. You have co�ercial in Holiday and in the last few years the trend has been co�ercial moving to the North. We have to be consistent. We have to decide either to go all the way R-3 and leave partially R-1 or R-2 or go and create a connnercial area all the way along University Avenue. I would like to see Mr. Chapman, if it is all n�ssible, if it is feasible to prepare a proposal which would ma.ke it possible to have comnercial area up 2'� Street. We also need a park in this area. There is a five acre plot, which is industrial and easily accessible from this area. We had it on the park bond iasue last year and it was defeated. We still need a park in this area. If we go R-3, it is going to create twi,ce the traffic problem that we already have. We have to have two blocks in depth for the com�nercial establishment. T would like to say that we instruct Mr. Chapman and Mr. Murphy to prepare a sketch showing commercial as discussed. Mr. Chapma.n stated that he did not think they were so far apart in their thinking. The concern was that the area between 60th and 61st should xemain pretty much the same, single family, but commercial activities should con£ine themselves along 47th and adjacent to Holiday. Most of the cacmnercial is right on the end, adjacent to Holiday. Coamercial �hould happen in this area. I am worried about this squeeze play on residential. I do not know the ma.rket for commercial in this area. If a larger area of comnercial should happen, it should be done on a large scale, a developer should get a number of parcels -- one half block, one third block or one and a half blocks. This would allow you a good devel�^ment. If individua� lots were sold, it should preferably be two or three at a time. Concerning the park area, our thinking was for the small children that they would not be required to cross a thorough- fare. Our idea was a neighborhood park rather than a city wide facility. , ' , , 5� Pla�i�� Co��asian Meet�ng - January 8, �969 Page 7 ��ank H. Hart, Jr., 6000 �rd St.: I was surprised so many people were againat Che park. Speaking of com�►ercial zoning, you have your big Holiday Sfioxes which are breeding places for juvenile delinquents. Some foxm of a paxk for the childxen to work off their frustrations should be figured in. If the people would stop to think about this, I think they would find it to be true: I think definitely there should be a park. Mr. Schmedeke: The reason we did not like a park in that area , a lot , of us people here have homes which are paid for, probably some in each block. When you take a home away that some people have already paid for, it makes it mean. E�eryone was interested in a park on Main and 61st Avenue. Appraiser's price never turns out to be what people have in the hame. If we are going , comnercial, I don't know how badly we need a toddlers park there. , , , Mrs. John Peka, 5925 2� Street: If we took this as a park, it will be just too small. If there is going to be a park, it should be for some of the older children, too. We are right across the street from the lady that owns the apaxtments. There is a problem of parking now and whea the streets are so narrow, I don't think a park would work. AeWayne H. Woehler, 6004 2� St.: I agree on the park. I have kids about to be teenagers. They are the ones who need the park -- toddlers stay �n the yard. The kids go to the swi�ing pool clear over to the Junior High. I would like to see a park in the industrial area as discussed. � Jensen said he wished to co�nend the people that have spoken tonight at this meeting. The Planning Couenission have received a great deal of assistance. Cosmrne�ts have been made in a very fair fashion. Oftentimes these public ' me�tings do not turn out this way. He believed they all had a fine inter- change of ideas. , , C_J , LJ �I Mrs. Crooks: I agree with Mr. Hart on the proposal for a paxk in that area. The present Sylvan Hills Park is �iDt adequate for the larger children. We need more park area for these children and I believe it is necessary for' the coirmunity. Kenneth R. Strand, 5955 2� Street: I am in the area where everybody talks about coII¢nercial. I am undecided yet. I would just as soon see the lot just as it is, R-2, but if three quarters of the block goes conm�ercial, I would have to go for conmercial, too. Mrs. Crooks: From 59th Avenue to 60th Avenue West of 2� Street, there axe new homes that have been in not too many years and are nice homes. There axe xeal].y only two that are small so there would be quite a few homes you would have to disrupt. Anyone could sell their particular parcel, bu� we would have to live there for twenty years. At the present time, the homes along �hat area would be very much harmed by the change of zoning and more tnultiples wou�d be very hard tr� live next to, but if you develop Uaiversity £i7rst and then go back, perhaps our area would be ready. Conrad D, Garness, 5916 2nd St.: I feel rather than take somebody's hoxne wk�en there would be enough room elsewhere, the park should be in the i'�dustrial zone where it has already been mentioned. ' ' I ' , r � � ' � � ' ' ' ' , � ' ' a _ J� ��}�}�}�. ,,, Co�i.ssion MeetinQ - January 8, 1969 Par�e 8 �trs. Haxlow Kinney, 5841 2� St.: Talking about building up apartment houses, we buflt our h,ome to specifications. This is probably about the only one that is built this way. We would be living there with apartments all the way axound us. The problems of the apartment across the street are traffic, xubbish and garbage. I would like it to be total co�nercial starti�ng at one end and working their way up. Mr. Schmedeke: I would like to have you accept these petitions. In my praposals, I don't think all of us are hoping to wait for a shopping center to buy the whole works. I think it would be fair to start at one side of the block from a cou�ercial area and taking at least.the smallest size area that, was so.ld ac.ros's the s,txe�t from,us. If, it were tl�ree or four lots wide, , : , ., � that would b� sufficient on �he �full blocks I was 'h'oping it ;��u,i�i go �he d�pth of the block, hoping with .your �oi�cura�eticer the building �c�gt�� le� i�n,� ; the front (West side) with parking in the b'ack and it would not.��c3wt, pa�kizig ?� from the highway. This would be solved on the small lots by ha�iiig a screen o£''evergreens and sodded. And having the parking at the back of'the buildings� .� it would be possible for it to be as nice a place as anywhere in the City. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Co�ission receive the Petition dated December 15, 1967 circulated by Eldon Schmedeke xe�,a�ive to a desire for cammercial zoning in Blocks 12, 21, 22 and N� of Block�28 in Hyde Park Addition ot, Frid�ey, and also a Petition for Blocks 12, 21, 22 and 28 for the same purpose dated January 3, 1969 apparently circulated by Eldon Schmedeke, and a Petition dated January 3, 1969 apparently circulated by Erwin Bjorngjeld requesting that the existing R-2 zoning be maintained in Block 9 and W� of Block 10, and Petition dated January 3, 1969 circulated by Clifford Skillings requesting that the present R-2 zoning be maintained a18o in BJ.ock 9 and W� of Block 10, and a Petition dated January 3, 1969 circulated by Lee Baxott requesting the existing R-2 zoning be maintained in the E� of $],ock 8 and Block 7, all in Hyde P3rk Addition. Upon a voice vv�e, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Erickson asked if Mr. Schmedeke wished to present his maps, but Mx. Schmedeke declined eaying he would bsing them to a meeting for the CoAmis- sion to study. Mr. Chapma.n said he felt at this point that he would like to read the transcxipt qf this meeting to clarify, in his mind, what the feeling is. To digest it to see if he has learned something different fram what the Planning Co�ission has learned and then discuss it with them. Mr. Mittelstadt said he felt the Mayor thought this study was not complete. He felt it would be up to the Council to decide what the future steps should be. �,'he following by Mr. Jensen was for clarification to the public: Mr. Mittelstadt has been on the Planning Coirmission for a relatively short time and waan't in on the full background of study. It is true the consulting plannexs were hired by the City Council, but they have been working pretty mouch under the directic and in consultation with the Planning Conenission with relatively little contact with Council. From that standpoint, it would seem logical for that direction to come from the Planning Comnission unless the Council would direct us in another direction. � I , � , ,; �)� �1„�asu�iA� CamAnissio� l�eetint� - Januarv 8, 1969 pa�e g � ChaixYnaa Erickson said he agreed. He thought Mr. Chapman's coaments of wanti�ng to study the transcription was fine, but if the Council wished to direct him to prepare another map of the area showing feasibility of what seems to be the general opinion of a cousaercial district along 3rd Street, we should dixQct him at this point. Mr. Myhra said it see;ms without a question it is the•feeling of the group and that's what we want. � Mr. Jensen com�aented that one axea of concern relative to the;idea of cc�msaercial expansion in the general vicinity of 3rd Street to 2� Street from 59th Avenue to 57th Avenue is the economics. I am not particularly well versed in this subject as an individual, but if this were proposed tp be � zoned can�nercial, and that the Planning Comnission would recommend it tq the Council, I would be somewhat concerned that we should have the op�nion of an expert on the marketability of this property as commercial and capabil,ity � of the individuais living in that area to actually sell their property with the improvements on it for a fair price and to actually find buyers that would be able to pay that fair price. It would not be logical to embrace a ' plan which would not be economically feasible for those owniag property at the present time and future potential buyers. ' Chaixman Erickson asked Mr. Chapman if he would care to co�ent now on 60th Avsnua and the land South. Mr. Chapman answered he would like to discuss it wi.th the Planning Co�ission before going in that direction. ' Mayor Kirkham commnented that there is a question of whether vr not marketability data is in the realm of our responsibility and before we ask for or order such a report, we should get an opinion from the City Attorney. �� ' Chairman Erickson said the practice of spreading a coamercial use in a xesidential area would have�to be handled with great care because of the majority of people itrvolved and the problem of selling. Rather than call a brief ge�neral public heaxing, the Planning Comnission could call Mr. Schmedeke and others if they wish, to come in and sit down with us and then call the geaeral public in again. . Covacilman Liebl said that he knew what the people would like, but felt he would like to be represented by Mr. Chapman. He did not see any problem �.n people selling their homes for commercial. Mr. Jensen asked for a show of hands of those who thought it was logical �or tY►e Planning Commission to be studying the area. There was a majority wk�o thought it was worthwhile. � Chairman Erickson informed the public that Mr. Chapman, Mr. Schmedeke � and anyone else who wished to represent the area would be aotified of the meeting and that the residents of the area would be notified of the public meeting, � I ':' 2. REQU�ST FOR RELEASE OF LOT 30, BLOCK 11, HYDE PARK ADDITION BY KENNETH R STR4�NTD: ' Mr. Strand explained that Council received the requeat at their meeting of ,�anuary 6th and notified him that they would just as soon not release the ].oC until this study was completed. He tried to buy this lot ian June and � 1 �1 �la��.��; CQ�aission Meeti.n� - January 8, 1969 Page 7.0 --- - � �'�d faund the City had pulled it off the market last March. Of course T cari sse, he said, why you didn't want to release it now, but maybe that is in my ' faVOx, tao. I own I.ots 20 and 29. At the time of buying I have no purpoee ot��side of cleaning it up, level it down as it is higher than my propexty ax�d C'he children play on it. I would keep it clean and control it and add ' it ta ury yard. I have only a single garage added onto my house and I would l�.ke po�sibly to put a garage on the lot. ' 1 � 1 ' 3. � The Chairman asked him if, in the light of this, he would object if the Pl�,�ntting Commission tabled his request for a couple of months. Mr. Strand anawered that he had no objections but would like to go on record to have the f�rst opportunity to buy it after the study, 8s he beli�►�d ti� could u�i.la,ze the land better than anybody. Mx�. Strand was informed that by following the progress of the study, he will knaw when the appropriate time is to open his request, probably when the Plaxining Coumnission foxwards its recom�nendation to Council. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Co�ission table the item of a request for the release of Lot 30, Block 11, Hyde Paxk Addition by Kenneth R. Strand. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the �tion �arried unanimously. REZONING REQUEST: ZOA ��68-13, HANA4ERLUND ENTERPRISES,,,_INC.: Paxcel 10 and 2QU (Noxth 903 feet of E. 3/4 of NE� of NE2 of Section 13). Rezone from R-1 to R-3A. Reaffirm public hearing date of January 23, 1969. Mr. Jensen said that this property adjoins New Brighton and wondered if we� ' should ask the adsninistration to respond with at least some data as to the zoning across the City boundary. (A public hearing notice was mailed to the City Clerk of New Bxighton but was not asked for a response.) ' � ' 4, ' MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Coxrm�as�o� xeschedule the public hearing o:f the rezoning request ZOA 4k68-13, Ha�ner�und Enterprises, Inc. of Parcel 10 and 200 to rezone from R-1 to R-3A �o January 30, X969 due to the inability to get a quorum on January 23, 1969 and dixect the administration to re-advertise and send corrected notices to th� Fr�.dley Sun and to the general public. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. REZO�NING REQUEST: ZOA �k69-01. PEMTOM, INC.: That paxt of SE� of Section 24 that lies North of State Highway ��100 right of way. To rezone from R-1 to P.D. Reaffirm public hearing date of January 23, 1969. MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Cosmissiou ' xeschedule the public hearing of the rezoning request ZOA �69-01, Pemtom, Inc. of that part of the SE� of Section 24 that lies North of State Highway �100 ri.ght of way, to rezone from R-1 to PD to January 30, 1969 due to the inabil�ty to get a quorum on January 23, 1969 and direct the administration to re-adverti�e , a�nd send corrected notices to the Fridley Sun and to the general public. Upon a voiGe vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ' ' C� C' C� ' �� Plan,x�,in� Commission Meetin�g, - Januarv 8, 1969 Page 11 5. SUGG�S7.'ED REVISIONS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMF:NT ORDINANCE: The Engineering Assistant explained that there are two separate �xeas of th� Ordinance which we have found need for possible revisions and/dr additions. We have al.so been asked if this body would consider recommending to Council specifi.c uses in a paxticular area upon the approving of an are� zoned P.D. We have found, and as reflected in a letter from the City Attorney, a por- ' tion of the Ordinance that isn't quite clear in respect to what happens to a P.D. district when a plan no longer is valid due to the annual review necessary. If upon reviewal it is found to be not practical according to the present ordin- ance, it seems that if no plan is brought in, or the development of an approved � plan is not consumated in one year, it would abolish the zone and revert back to its prior zoning. We want to know if this is truly your intent. L_J � ' Membership discussion on this indicated a need for`Ordinance,Amen�nent .to �:. reflect the continuance of the zone with`- or without an approved p��;and th8��r '� `'� an approved plan, if in existanae, should be reviewed annually un'�3:1` �its �com'r '�? � ; ;; pletion. ' ' �; � The second portion we should discuss is the possibility of staging the subtnittance of final complete plans and ii�rement development of large areas as in the Pemtom request. �n the discussion by the members, it was determined that in large areas ' where a development could be spread over a period of years, it would be im- pxac�ical to expect a developer to bring in final plans for the entire area oaly to iind that revisions would become necessary, the result of which would be very , expensive. Many aspects were discussed and it was decided that if an overall prelimin,ary plan indicating such things as type of buildings, road patterns and stxeet grades were submitted for approval, the developer could bring in final plans �r smaller portions as the plan developes. The Commission felt they would � se� the minimum size of each stage but wanted more time to study that aspect of i,t. They asked if the city attorney, when he rewrites the portion on develop- ment plans, could at the same time, include a section on stage development. , ' � Darrel Clark stated that he had been speaking with Pemtom representatives ' and that they were going to ask the City for some sort of indication as to our feelings toward their specific development plan in so far as what use we would permit to be part of the development plan. They stated they would rather have the zoning request denied if we were not going to agree to a townhouse and apartment complex for their area. The reason for this request is a matter of financing and cost of having plans drawn. After studying the motives for the request, it was decided that there was ' merit in it. However, if they were going to be asked for any sort of comai,t- ment on use, they would want a plan presented at the P.D. hearing and would want public discussion on it. LJ ' ' AAJOtTTtNMENT : There being no further business, Chai.rman Erickson adjourned the meeting at 11:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted Hazel 0'Brian Recording Secretary ' 1. � BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CON'PROL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING MINTTTES, ,�ANUARY 15, 1969 The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman�Bierma,nn at 8:07 P.M. ROLI, CALL • �ERS PRESENT: Biermann, Aauge, Tonco, Sorneen ME1�ERS ABSENT: Erickson OTHEftS FRESENT: Peter Herlofsky-Senior Engineeri.ng Aide Mr. Bob Schroer was present to present his request. Mr. Schroer stated the building permit requested at this time was for the garde.n center building only. MOTION by Tonco to recommend approval of the area marked in red on the plane and to consider the traffic pattern as sriown to be acceptable. Seconded by Haug�e. IIpo.n a voice vote, tnere being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. � NIS N.E. NG THE SOUTH COUNTY. MINN Mr. Momchilovich was preeent to discuss his request. fiE:� I\��;_i3l�t� The followi,ng points were diecussed; 1. The boiler room wall (See plans�. 2. Soundproofing between floors (All carpeting or some other acceptable material�. 3. Setbacic of 40' (Owner's request to conform with neighbore to the South�. MOTION by Hau�e to recommend approval of the plans, subject to; 1. Items 1, 2, 3 ae discuased. 2. Other correctione maxked on the plans received January 7, 1969. 3. Drainage and grading plane as approved by the City Engineer. 4. The alternate plan for the ground floor ie considered adequate concerni.ng etorag�e axid laundry area. Seconded by Tonco. IIpon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unan�.mQUSIy, �2 , BLTILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL MEEr.CING JANUARY 1 1 6 5, 9 ; 1 3. corr� ' 8 A N.E MIN i�Yaq�VJJw/1 1 V V V1�wJ11�V V 1 1"1Ll � N1LJL111 1}LIY'/1 BF�TNETT PALM�R ADDITION THE SAME BEING NESOTA. REOUEST BY MR. R.ALPH THOMAS. C)t l PAGE 2 FRIDLEY� 1 Mr. Ralph Thomae was preaent to present his request. MOTION by Tonco to recommend approval of the plana as presented. ' Seconded by Hauge. IIpo.n a voice vote, there being no na.ys, the motion carried u.nanimouely. ' 4 . CON� 610' SER' ,�� ., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, TAE SAME BEING GAR.Y'S EAPOLIS STAR & TRIBIINE. 4915 CENTRAL AVENUE ' MINNEAPOLIS,^MINNESOTA). MOTION by Tonco to recommend approval of the moving of this building. ' Seconded by Hauge. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unan�.mously. , 5. CONSIDEftATIOPT OF A UEST TO CONSTRIICT AN ANIMAL HOSPITAL ON LOT 2 BLOCK 1 I�RWAL'S 2ND ADDTTION ANOKA COIINTY MINNESOTA THE SAME BEING 220 HIGHWAY N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA. UEST BY DR. I�NNETH SPELTZ AND DR. STEVE ERANDJORD ' 22 COACHWOOD ROAD ST. PAUL MINNESOTA . � Dr. Speltz, Dr. Brandjord and Mr. George Walquiet were present to discues their ' request. MOTION by Hauge to recommend approval of the plana subject to the following atipulationa; ' 1. Correctione as noted on the plane, dated and initialed by Mr. Bierma.nn. 2. The submieaion of a revised plot plan to the Building Inspection Department. ' Seconded by Mr. Sornsen. IIpon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion caxried unanimoualy. ' ADJOUT{1VMENT : ' The meetir�,g adjourned at 9:58 P.M. Reepectfully submitted, ' - ER OFSKY ' Seniox ineer'. Aide ' ' . . r ORDINANCE N0. �'(' � AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: The South 150 feet, front and rear of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision ��88 all lying in the South Half (S�) of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known as R-3A (apartment and multiple dwellings). SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area from zoned district R-1 (single family dwellings) to R-3A (apartment and multiple dwellings district). PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF �' .. p �'--�' , 196�. ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell Public Hearing: May 13, 1968 First Reading: August 19, 1968 Second Reading : �� f �' � v �� s� Publish. . . . . . . ; ,�. y-. ,{ _, � :� `: I ` �C� v � MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham �� , � i� A� L� / c� � tJ d` ' Rezoning Discussion � Louis Momchilov ich �/) ' 3030 Harding St. N.E. Mpls. 55418 � � Part�of L. 9, A.S. �88 ' , ' I ' I , I I I �. W. //4 CORNEA � � � i SfC. /J _i �� . ' � - - - --�Ct�iN�f�--SrT�►�E-'-A}8-?-HI6HW/�il—N�:-6-:—�, - ,�,; l: JJ N !I �7 !I! f►J �%1 ! ) /I .. .._ N...�1 .. 1 f ._ �......._- .�..II,:.t .I.�••.: ��ff ro • N , ; 1 � �� ( ` �.LIi61 �.f11� I�A'�IS�1 1 �. �� I �( � � R.yw�[(� JryMw jqdl�r�N �f'w, ' i N I � � � t A'%f 'f ��r'" ♦ K n.r 'j '� ��RNI . t ,Z 3 . � ; 2 3 ; ♦ 5 � � : � �.. , � :.�..r, . q y �I 1 'q N F,,,; �� y�,fr `�7y� � � i N� if�' (I� �. Y� �i 0 N ��%AUD ., i i; � , SUB. r.�..; '' ,» ,..., , . , .. �.' � � i , ....,. ... i ... .r a ix ' � � ii. i�. � , ./arq .., . I I�� I 1 :.W.v:N C. � ' 4► i Zi (, 4 �.wk,.� i 2� S 4,; �� 11 :� I 8� � j — t0 �� u '� 6 .. i� �««� ; M,.,,E°7�'.�, �' W ts . s � f� ' • iJ� . t lI .N I � .� /. AN' � � � � 1,�+ / � � i = �� i �� , i `Y..Ji � � �' � i , ( � . �..,., .� � , ti � . Q � Q = �'� ` . _ ..:.. f ' R � � � "° � i �.t. � ` � �.� . zs s = 1 ( !!/.%A E :.WN A� i i � , Z5Q � •IO � � iA �{i • . ... i .4.:wi� � ' t • ' � ` � � � � ss � s�r wr.s ....�...ns�.. : '1 � I � � � _ . ia , r < , - , z � � ,� �; z� . � ;12 tf io � 9 d i ; ;;� � . � � : s�� Z e�. � , . . . . ' i iY�i � y ` ir. � ' 0 3 s�r sst �sr �' Z�a �� I j �� s 2 2 �` t� `� �1� - - ~"� Z� ` 7 �.64 TH+,...tMiE-;, x ,E. •-:�. � � =I'� ,� " '.r s• ► , ` .. � C91 i � � ,. ;. ,. _. � � . � � � ,. � ,r. , , o.�„.. = 00 E AKE� i =' '' �u • � sA• , � I :�.w:. � : , �� ,2 Z 8� �; � ,�, .. s ,� .3 2 � . / � '�"� '�T}t'x : ; i.� • .� ,� r = I1� � � t 1 • v w.� H/ HL N S �� z'� i � i� .I ,n � , , r-, ' _. , ..�, , i� � � � . -s 'o Z !2 .. ' , , '; � �� ` i � " K s0 . :� ...., ,. iF- ' ,1 . ; c � , 21 9 e � � � � I�-__`:� � // ; i r;3i %� �� `' � � I ,-� 1 �f,. 1 .�... � � � w��, /f� ir� � % � � : � i Or//w► � f �W� ( 1 • � u �li , N . 7 O � Ab. / ; �. � �� . � � � t0 �� ' ! ' - -''' �F,,,. � � W � �. � L 1; R � !o � � d � ...�►- - � ;`�! ��' � r �,9 g �_, ., r » >s ,� .� �. . . �. . �;� .+ . , , , , �, : y ��, • ;� � � � : ` , . . -----;-...�-- 4--- � -- - ._.- ------� _.... ar- 83 RB - ��- . % 1� , t1 � • � ; �o�� I ' - i t�' ��: � J ..... �qVF . � .. . � � . z , � � � i ; ' e �. � �, �,. . ,r. �� z a � � . ' � �., .;" � I � I � ' .+' .�" ,,' • � � . � : � , .w . . � D �. ,� N,F . . , , � ., ; ' :.. •- �j ... . ._ . _. ._. ... -- = 18 , 12 ' r � _�...::..._ � •::-. �. .., , .� .. N .r. ., s i O�'�� y � � � � � :,� i. , � ,, � AUDITORS �� • j � ,;�� ; , , ; ' �i� �' , � a -� , i i � �'b. ,, •' y 1; W Q. I ;; ' �; M � � � Y f � � ' �� I � �+��p �n��u �+ ; • � �ti .r. ` rrr � i 1: � i; ; � i �� JW1J1��.7�V1r ; ,•i� 88 ;''`, • a• i.. i. � t Datbf lY'a J . y� � I � ' i `= 1�11 � .�i � I ";� !i, 1� 14t t ,, c: � ,I � •, `. , , • : , I 1 � 1 � d. ,' � �. � t • GS ` ' � �� r :� � �.OT 1T " • , w .�.. � � i � .�� N M ; •. � � I I ' , y� • 7 WEST MOORE �; KE �, • � � � �� _ ' � ' VE � i �1�. . � ' , ,� .:�„ , 3 i d � , ' , � � 1 l 1 �,wy `. �, � ` � ' � � � ...�. � � � � � i� I I Gsn>ii/ A✓�ns�� i � 1 {� � � � 1 � � � `� �i�rot>i.s� �..a � St� � i a1t�,voi,� �: � �'e \ w , _� i f � ; I t� .�c. r �t • ;, � . CC.fq'IR '� � v'� �'� \ O ��: � 1 �� /` i; 1' � • �� I 1 1 � �� \�� / '' '� o„r,�s 1 1 � I '�' ii � o�r�o! ` � : 9i�ONa/ Nw1 � � � � � 1 � ;. : � � �4.=s j 1 / � � I :'� , j' � � . : w ♦ J� � ' �� . �� i �� , � i j' S i y�i \� t r I l� i '� ' ; �� i � , �\ � �� I ! l� �� • �� \ � � j 1 II � � �� I �� , , K � � ___—_--..___ ..._._' �� w A�r �_ \\. • �,�- Y� I I.,�I _ /!_. � ._ � i' . ' �� THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUMAN RELATIONS CO:�IIT't'EE -- NOVEMBER 21, 1968 , f_1 � , ' The Meeting was called to order by Chairman John ivers. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Ivers, Batterson, Mrs. Moss, Mrs. Rossman, Starwalt, Hyness ��y�� Thompson, Father Keefe, John Oden. MEMBERS ABSENT: Buckley, Denyes, Mittelstadt, Kachina, Crowder. OTHERS PRESENT: Shirley Behrens, Sun Reporter. Ivers reported that the Council has appointed Police Officer John Oden to fill th� vacancy on the Human Relations Committee. Ivers reported that the Committee has been represented at two meetings (training sessions) sponsored by the State De�artment of Human Relations. Thompson reported on the meetings attended tiy himself and Ivers and Starwalt, on , Black History and Culture. Speakers were Lonnie Morgan and Frank Ke.nt. Mrs. Rossman also reported on the meeting which she attended where speaker was Dr. Na�rhan Wright, Jr. Ivers reported that he attended a meeting of North Suburban Human Rights groups. The group would like this Co:nmittee to consider a petition to the Board of Realtors, re: Fair Housing,. The proposed petition was referred to Kohlan of the Housing Subcommittee for study and recommendation. >. Kohlan stated that we should work to obtain changes in zoning laws and building codes to allow for more low cost housing, so that our City can achieve a good mix of people in all economic levels, races and backgrounds. On December 9, 1968 there will be an open meetir.g at Rosevi.11e Village Hall for persons interested in fair housing. Mrs. Moss reported for the Education Subcommittee; They have contacted the area schools regarding minority teachers. They have checked the libraries regarding booics:available. They have had coffee parties and invited minority persons to express their views. There will be a meeting sponsored by Covenant Church and St. Philli-ps Lutheran Church on Monday November 26, 1968 to acquaint people with tutoring of minority children. Mrs. Rossman introduced a guest, Mr. Joe Highland, of the Northeast Human Relations Council, a graduate student at the University of Minnesota. He is trying to sell a program of Black History in the suburban area schools. He passed out a proposed resolution petitioning the School Board, Superintendent, et al, to include minority history in their curricula, recruit minority teachers, etc. MOTION by Hynes, seconded by Mrs. Moss that the Fr�dley Human Rights Committee adopt the resolution presented by Mr. Highland. Upofl a voice vote, thexe being one nay, the motion carried. Following is the adopted RESOLUT�ON; WHEREAS, the problem of prejudicial attitudes has been recently driveri into sharper focus throughout our country and WHEREAS, white suburban communities have had too fea resources for coping I with thei,r lack of ur-'�rstanding of minority peoples, ;1 HUMAN RELATIONS MINUTES, NOVEMBER 21, 1968 PAGE 2 RESOLUTION (Continued) We THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY do hereby petition the School Board, Superintendent of Schools, Curriculum Coordinators of said school district to accept and adopt the proposals of this resolution. Proposals of RESOLUTION reas as follows; that efforts be made to place minority history into curriculum through • efforts of curriculum writing teams as soon as possible, that resource materials be made available to teachers K through 12 on minority history, that teachers be trained in minority history via forums, study groups, in-service training, that efforts be made to recruit teachers from minority groups (this recruitment effort be pursued in areas of most likely supply), that all present curriculum be evaluated for appropriateness and accuracy concerning minority history, ' that textbooks be evaluated for accuracy and inclusion of minority hiatory. ADOP'PED by Fridley Human Rights Committee November 21, 1968. The Employme�t Subcommittee had no report. The meeting was adjourned Respectfully submitted, John ivers, Chairman FRIDLEY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMITTEE � �� 0 - , 1'2/�OC Isl TOT,!1L d D Sf'ECIF1Cr17IOi!� SCivT Tv: S�CU;ITY 3 C�1RS 2 C,!12S PRIC� ♦ 1. Qroo!:dalc r=ord 2500 C�unty ;oad 10 Mi nn��;�ol i s 2. Qi 11 E3oyer Ford, Inc. 1201 ; {armo� P 1 ace Mi i�ne�ol i s 3. 3roo!<c�a1� C�irysl�r Plym�ut�� 6111 Osseo �toad Brool;lyn Cent�r ` �.� Cer�tral f�totor Sa1es 200J Ce�tral .4v�., �1.�. M�i nn�a;�ol i s `" 5. Coo�i ;?�pi us i�'►otors, Inc. c;.�<<: y 3��% COO:i r:cl�J1C1S �'�VC�. G%uc.i� Co�n Ra�i ds !�tt Incler 1 e� � 3 c`-C, `'� � �o��to�.��rr C:icvrc�; ei. Co;n;�:rny' 13� 1 ��iarmon P 1 ace P1i nn��l i s y 7. Fai�rvi e��r �P 1 ymout�� a r��-t< CLi�,�'k: ti..t4:...'k. 1 B00 U� i��er s i ty .�venue �,;.L e�; , St. �'aul �1tt: .�rt ;�leuma n S �.�u� �r $. art Goebel Ford� • . �� 12 Pubiic Squ�rE Ano?:a y. urossrn�n �;��vro�et �o. 1304 E. La�:e Str eet Min7eapolis 10. ��-lol i�ay G1 ds, Inc. 23 Pdor'th �t;i Street Mi nn��ol i s _ 11:. Iten Cnevrolet 57�1 Oss�o zo�d Mi nncM�?ol i s 12 . Jay ;�i i n� �;ievrol `t 1221 '.�J. La!<e Stre:t h1i nnea�ol i s _� ., 1.�.�._ �� 13. Sen-��y C`�evrol�t 1625 '.•d. �roac��:�y P'11 fl I'1 ° 1P � � 1 S 14 , P1a i n�r�oto� Sa } es 2?.2 �. T-�ain Street ano':- 15 .�iiar';et For d Sa l es, I nc . 725 ',l. 8r oad��ray Mi nneaJool i s 15 . R i ver Moi: or s b50 E. P�i� i n Str e�t Ano'�ca 7• � �r � 9 / �� '�-. S 5, c*c , .:_ , / � (� C i tr v`Z � � �� . �t� �y o - G� � ci'.C; � � � � L% y/3,65 6/�j �� G G c•i; I2 ! !, �' `= �/ . 7�,z�� c4 II RESOLUTION NO . _ I `�' — /°% � % R�$OI.UTION O�tDERING IMPROVEM�NT AND FINAI, PLANS A1�jD ' SF��FICATIONS AND EST7�IATES OF COSxS THE1tE0F ; STORM SEWER PRQtTECT # 89 � � LJ 1 ' u ' �� WHEREAS, Resolu�ion No. 187-1968 adopted the 18th day of November 1968 b� the City Counci.l, set the date for heaxing on the proposed improvements, as speci- �ical�.y noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A", and Wi�EREAS, all of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed w�Ch t'�e making af these i.mpxovements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten (10) day� xtota.ce by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) w�elc].y Publ�icat��ons pf the required notice, and the heaxing was held and the property ownexs heaxd �hexeon at the heazing, as noted in said n,oti�ce. NOW, THEg�k'QgE� gE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fr�.dley� Anoka County, M3.nnesota, as follows: 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 187-1968 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as possible to-wit: Storm sewer, drainage facilities and appurtenances in and ' serving the area bounded by T.I�, 4�65 on the West, 73'� Avenue oa the North, Central Avenue on the East and the Mfnnesota , Transfer Railway Tracks on the South. ' . ' ' 2• That woxk to b� p�x�ormed under this groject may be perfonned undex one ox moxe Contraats �s may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids. 3. Tha� Canstock and Davis zncorporated, 1446 County Road J ' Minneapolis axe hereby desi,gnated as the En��neers for �h�s �mpxove- ment. They shall, pzepar� final plans and specifications �or the maki.r�g a� such impxovement. � ' ' ' A�",�ES� : ' ' ' A1�PT�A �Y THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS �d' DAY OF ' , 1969 . GT�'K �L��IC � Maxvin C. Ax'unsell �IA.YAR - Jack p . Kirkham ' � ' , �� , ' ' ' , � ' �I'' 1 , RESOLUTlON N0. R�SOLUTIQN ORAERING IME'ROVEM�NT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIF�CATIONS AND ESTII�IATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STORM SEWER PROJECT #80 u�� f;�i WHEREAS, Resolution No.196-1968 adopted the 9th day of December 1968 by �he City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as speci- �i.ca].ly noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A", and WHEREAS, all of the property ownex�s who e property is liable to be assessed wi.th the making of these improvements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten (10) d�ys no�ice by mail and pub��shed noti�ce pf the Council Hearing through two (2) we�kly gubl�cat�.ons o� the requixed notice, and the hearing was held and the pro�exty ownery heard thexeon at the hearing, as noted in said notice. 1VOW, THE�FOR�, BE TT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka Co�nty, M�.nneso�a, as �ollows; ]. . �. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 196-1968 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as possible to-wit: Storm sewer and appurtenances in and serving the area bounded by (as per plan �k2 of preliminary report) T.H. �k47 on the West: T.H. #65 on the East: 61s[ Avenue and West Moore Lake Drive on South: Rice Creek on the North That work to be pertormed under this project may be performed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids. 3. That Comstock and Davis Incorporated, 1446 County Road J, Minneapolis are hereby designated as the Engineers fox this impxove- ment. They shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making o� such impxovement. ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _� p,�y pF I ' +�A.k�V.l. s ' C��X CL�RK - Marvin C. Brunsell 1 , 1969 . MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham � RESOLUTION NO . � � � � % �O � RESOLUTION ORDERTNG IMPROV�M�N� ,ANp FINAL PLANS AND ' SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND S�ORM SEWER PROJECT N0. 90,ADDEI�IDUlI #1 �� '`J � � ' L_1 1 ' C� � ' � W�IERFA�S, Resolu�ion Np. 198-1968 adopted the 9th day of December 1968 -.by the C�ty Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as speci- fically noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A", and WHEREAS� all of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed wi�h fihe pnakiang of these improvements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten (IO) dayg noti.ce by mail and published notice of fihe Council Heaxing through two (2) week].y publi,cat�.ons of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property owners heaxd thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice. NOW, TI�EREFORE, $E IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka Cou�ty, Minneso�a, as follows: 1, That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 198-1968 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as possible to-wit: Water lateral,water aad sewer services and appurtenances serving properties located on 66th Avenue: From University Avenue East to the cul de sac � 2. Tt�at work to be performed under this project may be perfonned under ax�e or moxe contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt o# bid�. 3. Tha�f�stock and Davis Incorporated, 1446 County Road J ' Minneapolis are hereby designated as the Engineers for this improve- ment. They shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. � ' ' A'�T�ST : ' ' �- �,I .ADOPTF.A BY THE COUIVCTL OF THE CITX OF FRIDLEY THIS �- �'' , 196�. � �C�TX C�ERK � Maxv in C. Brunsell �'i rY � DAY OF MAYOR - Jack'0, Kirkham ' �so�varzor� �vo . ,/ 3 — i � � y . `�1 RESAT�UTZON ORA�RING I1�A.'ROV�MENT AND FINAL PLANS ANp ' SPECZFTCA�IONS AIvD EST�MA,TES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEM�NT PR0.TECT �T 1969-1 � I� ' ' , ' WH�REAS, Resolu�ion No. 194-1968 adopted the 9th day of December 1968 by the Ci.�y Cou�cil, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as spec�- fically �noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A", ar►a WHEREAS, all of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed wiCh th� tnaking of these improvements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten (10) days notice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications o� the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property owners heaxd thex�an at the heaxing, as noted in said notice. NUW, THLREFORE, B� IT RESOLVED, by the Council of t�e City ot Fridley, A�noka Cou�ty, M?�nnesota, as follows: 1� That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 194-1968 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as possible to-wit: ' $treet impxovements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-taix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, water and sanitary sewer •ervices and other facilities located as follows: � ' , �� ' ' � � I � � ' � �� y � � . r Aivexview Terrace: Mississippi Place to Mississippi Way 1'�iaeissippi Way: East River Road to Rivezv iew Terrace (South of Fridley Park) . '�est �ervice Ad. �.H. �65: RicQ Creek to Minnesota Trans��r Ra'ilway track right of way North line 0 �$sC Service Rd. of East River Road: �Starting from 1, p0 Feet SouGh of South leg of Intezstate �694 Tr*erchange Northeast to Aailroad xighC 0! NsY. ('1r�ct "J" pxoposed registered land susvay) $eveath Street: Missisaippi Street to 68th Avenue bbCh Avenue: Univexsity Service Road East to cul de aac �;b8th Avenue: Rice Creek Terrace to Washington Street Ald�n Wayt 62nd Way to 200 feet North Jeii'erson SC.: b7th Avenue to 680 feet North Waehington St.: 67th Avenue to S00 feet North 68th Avenue �eventh Street: 68th Avenue to 480 ieet North .�'purth Street: 67th �venue to Rice Creek Terrace �iCe Creek Terrace; Hwy. �47 $ervice Road to 68th Aveaue 42nd Wsy: Riverview Terrace to Eaat River Road 1'[Zird &treet: 49zh Avenue to S3rd Avenue . , Pags �. RE$OI,UTION N0. ' �� P � 9C. 1969-1 2. That work to be performed undex this project may be performed under one ar more cantractS as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids. 3. Tbat the City Engineer, Nasim Qureshi, and the City's Consulting Engineers are hereby designated as the Engineers for this improve- ment. They shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. ADUPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS � DAY OF � , 1969. ATTESTi C�TX CT,�RK - Marvin C. Brunsell MAYOR- Jack 0. Kirkham i'� ' � , ' ' h,.� �� OFFICIAL P[j$I,IGATION CTTX Ok' b'RIAL�X (EXHIB�T A) NOTICE OF FIF,ARIr'G ON IMPROVII•fENTS , STREET INA'ROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1969-1 0 W�iEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, •MinnesA�a, has deemed it necessary and exgedient that the improvements h�xeiiiafter described be made. � NOW, THEItF;FORE, rOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT on the 13th day of Januarv, 1969 at 8:30 o'clock P.M., the City Council will meet at the City Hall in said City, and will at said time, and place, hear all �at�tip& interested in said improvements in whole or in part. The general n�tture of the improvements is the constraction (in the lands and streets noted belo�a) of the following improvements, to-wit: _ . � R�„u T�OIv' TaEM � . Str�et improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bi�um3.nous mat, concrete curb and gutter, water and sanitary sewsz se�vices and other facilities located as follows; : Rive�vi.ew Terrace: Mississippi P1ace to Mississippi Way Missi,ssippi Way: East River Road to Riverview Terrace (South of Fridley Park) West Service Rd. T.H. �65: Rice Creek to Minn�sota Transfer Railway track right of way North line I�ast Service Rd. of East River Road: Starting from 1,000 Feet South of South leg of Interstate �694 Interchange Northeast to Railroad xi,ght oF way. (Tract "J" proposed registered land survey) Seventh Street: Mississippi Street to 68th Avenue b6th Avenue: University Service Road East to cul de sac 68th Avenue: Rice Creek Terrace to Washington Street Alden Way: 62nd Way to 200 feet North Jefferson St.: 67th Avenue to 680 feet North Washington St.: 67th Avenue to 500 feet North to 68th Avenue Seventh Stxeet: 68th Avenue to 480 feet North Foux�h Street: 67th.Avenue �o Rice Creek Terrace Rice Creek �exrace: Hwy. �47 S�rvice Road to 68th Avenue Hwy, �`47 East Sexvice Road; Rice Creek Terrace to 300 feet South 62nd Way: Riverview Terrace to East River Road 1't�i.rd S�xeet: 49th Avenue to 53rd Avenue 89TT.�IATEA COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $_ 280L979.18 'i'HAT TI� AREA PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR SAID IMPROVEMENT I8 AS FQLLOWS: , ' ' ' :-, r-- L� 1 1 i 0 1 � 1 1 1 � � �� 1 1 1 ... ►y� > �' � � � � -------_ . i 69iH �AVE. IJ.f. .'i� . i _ ___._ _--�--- --------------- - f l � � .Sr�LE r5 uJN�cN ----<�J �� GAN iSe /-�/N� d �.c�i r'vou s' x ro.� , SC w�c � !� ' J O ,� I � ST�feIS W/`!/C/{ ♦ , . C �1.f/N 0 T �f E ,� � / /N /P�PO f� G /� IU /T.�A°�O �' fTO�Piy SEw ' w u � ¢ �. �� r i . �•V ' � / . � _,. ! � a_ ¢ ^� /� v, _ i /`� � ,,I -'_' � 5 �� a :'� /c �, �. � �� o- . h r. �v ?v ;H ' ^ .' �. �4�.,. % : F ! ._ � ,�, rp �f s M M :.QEER ----._ _.. _ .. _ .. r IJ - � W n � c�q^ P�NDORA ---A_ _ y � ' " - ... � � Ob-ERrON _-- _ _..�_ - - � 8�� 18 � kENkASTON � _""^ � 1-� �W ~ N ! 15" 15�� '7.� � _' a r __� � __ 8 T �e _'.- - _ 0 � � _ H �I W� r > , , I . . ' • . � t � � -' �.�1 \ � i i a � �� . E" - - 1 4. � ' � O ' ( � � - . . � � • I f r � b. O t . 18�� ---,�� -�----------- __ 30� _\ _,____.� _ �_ ' — --�- -- -•----- NL'� -- - � :+;a "'� .; -� ��' --- �-- -----Y- - h JE -,�.� ' . • .t ' ; '� -- • - -. ;_. ; ' . .. •. . • . ` r. '� . -�i• � � �t �•• •� • � . t � � , • � j .• '� . _ _ � � � •i <• : • ' � ..._-- _ --------------f—��.--- -•-- � • . � • • ` . LACE r_ 6 TN' _�--. 4•. ..i[. -_"__--- �N.� ��•. . • , . . ' • ,�' . AP , �. � � � � . . , . . . � � r � '•, • •..�.y � `__ -- - ; : . • . ,, . ' • ' • ' -- _ .. . , . . L � ' ' - 66 TH r• . K , . . ... . _ r:� . - . �eti..� . , � . . . �, /'.... ... _ __ __. . . � , , � - � { . c: ' — : - n _ . . , . . . • / . , ,c � vi R•.� � ',,�•� I � �-:_ : 2N�_ _7 �" . � � � � . . � �. . . �.r . ., . :;i . . . . . : --� , ,-'=�:- , --.- : . '- �' �...: _----------------- �-,-�.-; � , . , . . , -- � �.' ' ��:._r!-e �'� � s�l • • ai_._'� .� , '• • � � .`�' ` Y \ l • •l, � AY ~c -,;V� . : i�� _ �' _•'; ' S ..�`_�4 f. , . . ; % ' �-.ti.�.: `"'. , • --� � :_ }.�'_"-- ,1� �� ..'_. .._. _.... � \�' .- . ,I'•�. . • � �._ '�.. .��• � •�, � i _ � '`• . 1 `~ . �fj,. \. . _._ . ._ ._ ... ,__,\, •��• � , � .I � , , ,� �Fj�'r.. -' _�„ ,�� u • � + � •, (� . ` -', `--- _�:_�1�..,� - � �, :- � � i� . �� JI IU�� rryy Ii - _ ...�..�:��.�� . ' , W ' ,�. �� r. 1j "�j�� (r` - �--. s Y� .• j N•\ �.+.T'�_*iJ f� , f. �Ti ,, ',• � � i � i... . _ •,� �J � � � �- . �' � � / � Z W � � "• / > .. ..._ _ _� ... . _"�_' l f . y f[ W W !- � . / v �- s � • �` � � . " � - �. -. - - t � i N . � N � • +�- `, i 1 +� '_ ' = t . ._-_ � - � n � � o � .; �; _- " �'., I F z N •.� ,, ' � i ( n o i ( , T � Q � �\ � ��! , ' / ! ' _ N . � • � ; r 1 � 4 � S Z r ' � I I .. 3 - �. `` Q . O .J � , � , . . �.' l ._ .._. �Z � - i d 4 � I . � r_'_.'._'_.__.___ ___-._.-�. _.__ __� � ..� � �.t. • . ��! ( -. , si � � � -._....- .._ _ . .. .... . __ . .. ____ "'._. ._.__..._._....�'��.1� A��1� � � ' � / • ' ' � . , � - . + � . ' � ' . �.��. ' , 1 _ r � � • � . • � 1 ' , .. ._..' -• _-'._- -• '--_ � i ,� � � • ,�/ � � 1 i � I �� \ � . I . � : ; � � � � .�J I I ± � � �) CN . i � I ` � ; � � ,, --1 1 ( � ' � . �" � :- i �J 1 :, � „ , _J _ i ; ► � _ 9.•��1 ,rJ_ — • �- , _ � � , i � " i ` r=` �� - -_. � .� I I ' I .F I , �j � ,� � ' ' ' 1 � � L1 ' ' I� ' ' �' �/� RESOZUTIpN N0. /7 �l RESOLUTION APPROVTNG 10 YEAR STREE!' Il�"ROVII`�NT PROGRAM FOR �'� GITY OF FRIDLEY WH�EAS a ma�Qrity of approximately 85 miles of city streets have been imp�cavad with 4uxbi.ng and bla�ktop pav�ng and ther� are only about 18 miles o� �treets o�ez� to traffic which do not have curbing and axe substandard. WHk'�.EAS �.dvax�aed plaxLning and scheduling of the improvements will provide; � 1• A pl�.n for street improvements that will $ive property orrners a.dvance .riotification concerning theae improvements. 2. A better street a.mprovement through advanced coordination and planning of Co�iatxuetion. 3, Reduoed Engineering costs by advance schedulin� of an eetablished number pf miles of etreets each yeax. 4• Adequate temporary repaira to the streets depending upon their scheduled year of improvement and thus a better uti'_ization of our street maintenance mon,iee , WfTEREAS the ixlformal public hearinga for this program were held before the City Council at 9:00 P.M. on December 9, 1968 and January 1j, �96g at the Fra.dley Civic Center. BE IT RESOLVID, by the Council of the City of Fridley as follows: 1. Tha� the ten year str�et imprpvement program as eubmitted by the City En��neer, Nasim M. Qureshi, ia hexeby approved and attached hereto and made part thereof reierence as Exhibit A and Exhibit B. ' 2. That the City Council will hold the required legal �.mprovement public hearinga, a year before trie proposed acheduled years for the etreets improyemer�te as indicated c�n Exhibit "A". �' � , , ' ' ADOP�'�D BY THE CITY COIINCII, UF T� CITY �F FRI)LEY THIS DAY OF 1964. ATTEST: OTTY CI,�RK �- Marvin C, Brunsell � ✓ ,� MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham rv�+ I �) ' LJ � �_ I w��, EXHZBIT "A" �� 10 YEAR STREET TMPROVEI�ENT �ROGRAM Fox th� City of Fridley The sub-standard sections of the following streets to be improved to the City s�andards which are concrete curb and gutter with blacktop �a�vement at the latest by the year indicated in front. ' YEAR STREETS TO BE IMPROVED-(SUB-STANDARD SECTIONS ONLY)-See attached map ' ' , ' � , � ' LJ � � C' � IJ 197Q �#lden Way, Ashton Avenue South, Bacon Drive, Hartman Circle, Hickory Circle, Hickory Drive, Hickory P1aCe, Hickory Street, I,akeside Road, Locke Lake Road, Onondaga Street, Starlite Boulevard, Sylvan Lane, 61st Avenue, 61st Way, 62nd Way, 62 1/2 Way, 63rd Way, 63 1/2 Way, 69th Way, 70th Way, 73 1/2 Avenue. 1971 Altura Road, Ashton Avenue, Beech Street, Dover Street, Elm Street, Ely Street, Ironton Street, Liberty Street, Longfellow Stxest, West Moore Lake Drive, 4th Street, 5th Street, 6th Street, 54th Avenue, 77th Avenue, 79th Way. 1972 Axthur Street, Benjamin Street, Capitol Street, Clearview Lane, Ferndale Avenue, Gardena Avenue, Gibralter Road, Horizon Drive, Hughes Avenue, Oakwood Manor, Panor.ama Avenue, Pilot Avenus, Rpman Raad, Stinson Boulevard, Topper Lane, 60th Avenue. J.973 Clover P1ace, Jefferson Street,�Matterhorn Drive, Monroe Street, Regis Lane, Rice Creek Terrace, Washington Street, 4th Street, 6th Street, 7th Street, 66th Avenue, 68th Avenue. 1974 Apex Lane, Broad Avenue, Buffalo Street, Carrie Lane, Cheryl Street, Dover Stxeet, Ely Street, Jackson Street, Madison Street, Marigold Terrace, Quincy Street, Riverview Terrace,West Moore Lake Drive, 4th Street, 5th Street, �th Street, 56th Avenue, 57th Avenue, 58th Avenue, 59th Avenue. 1975 Main Street, 2nd Street, 2 1/2 Street, 3rd Street, 58th Avenue, 59th Avenue, 60th Avenue. � 1976 Able Street, Baker Avenue, Brookview Drive, Carol Circle, Carol Darzve, Taylor Street, Van Buren Street, West Service Drive Highway #65, 64th Avenue. 1977 Arthur Street, Channel Road, Dellwood Drive, Lucia Lane, Missa.ssippi Street, Pierce Street, 63rd Avenue, 64th Avenue, 66th Avenue. 1978 Bennett Drive, ,Jefferson Street, Madison Street, Monroe Street, Washington Street, 5th Street bth Stxeet, 57th Place, 60th Av�nue, 63rd Avenue. Approved by the Fridley City Council day of Submitted By . G�� ti( • � NASIM M. QUR SHI, P.E. • City Engineer - Director of Planning N^,-^�^-T—�-'—.-'---'�--'--�--�--- j ---. 4 ,i-- � - - 7-- --�-1 ! ( 7 �` w 4�:..� z_�1:�....�_..._ 1 ��TY OF FRIDL'EY '�• � �a Y � — .. �.... _ .. �_., �� — i,�� , .... � --�. t.� , .., _ . � �i , _ . . . �� . ,, `' _ - . .-_� �_ _ 10 YEAR STREET _ .��z��v��,��. �,2 _ . � ,__..... _ ��,,.` , �.. ,� �pROVEL�IdT PROG'�tAM � r� � . .-�-, .. . . - � :-� , _- - ' FOR FRIDLEY, MINN. �c ' � _ j+� :.. � .. ,_ � - / ' �r`--�--,�- .. :.... , , !7� � �� /97/ _ ._ _ - EXHIBTT ��$�� ' �: ' - - �__• . , • :, �1 . � �..... . .,, � - , ._ � � � ' � '? i - �J � \ ' ; �,�, --� , _ �� I-� � G':. �"\� \V��' _ ' � , _ ' .a+ i � ' � —�.-�— -�'�u-' _��.= ;W, ' c�l� li ��b� ��]� °t �� !: I� � -, '!",t __ ��' ` � —� ' � c °. �_��5�G 1 jI ,..'," c// � �' i � � � �'��ri 1 ��F' � L.. �'i ^j�i �M�� ' E �_ .' . � ; H � ,-i��— ( �t�; , �'�c� � �,,�� =-`� I�..� .�_ � � r�, ��— ij ; �11 ± Ir � �,a4� y _ r ' �-'1 _ _ y=- � `la.�r'�� K '� �_ ' �_ W _ E j � I� - p �g� / �:_� iMi � — _ '.i �,�i I:_. � � I,� •� •Y �n �� Ir` \� I 1 ' _ ' �� L � �� r .` � I ��_��. t � � '�� , _ _ N .., \( // J� ` !� � � . , i _ -�_//� `•\� , � ■■r,I` I�� \ `I �]LK a1 I � ^1 �II �� ". � R, _ ..� ' �� i �� Y�PL. � _ � , i=.. , �L. (-'�`1�'�( I . � _ �I�.�IU�� J�r�'1 T "'"�T_�. �;� ' .n� ----- � �� :� � �. �� , � a '-l�� r � - - -- '-,r�� - ' I ' �� - a 1 ir� ;i�� f ' � :e��; ` `,� - � �, , , , �,.� ,.� . -- -- � , ,4; r� �_4 . ffi -, � _� , � Jr�,�- � � a � _. �`� � � � � =�' � � --- � �`�---� � � M � .� � �„ - �: �T� `�. l,�w' �E ,_ , �n� - � —_ I _ � � ., ` i�i Mo�"� e.�� , - � l �� r ,1\�. -� � ` ' �:;�€ �l��, / �� , ;� ._ m2 . i '�� I ._. -- (P-y �"'�_ �= �� ._ ! , � " \ � _ .__ L ^ � � ; ' �� . "1r1�� ,��_-� i '�.� Is�3 '', �-�,� `- � i ' j � :i -�>-= �_� � � _ �'� � �-' �, � � F,� �-. . t _ � ; ��, „ '�� - � _� ¢� �, ��'' � +�� _ � : I _'�L J _ ' e � ]E , � � �- - � '� ' � " - �� (( ��_' � . , � �'`' "� 1 i I� ; `' c —�, �, jF�� t� U_�Y—�� I ';I , � � i L - .. . -�� ! _ � . � I ' ._._ _ _ I� ' �=s..«�� _..'..'_"__—'-_— I j �� , i sei` =r a--.r__ � =m- � \ .._._ 6 � ' _. - � - ��.. L.. �� .s ......r �s` - �=- � � � I: � ��i� 'I� �� m=.--._ � i= °=g — _- _� � - � ,I = _ �`, -_��' =-=... .. =_ �T�I�� --� -- —� �_�= � � . � =g ��--- '�^� i, _�„ g,� � __" _;a� - ��.,,� , + � i Cl.'!L i �'i - ° � �_° = =L —.—.: — � -� � - il s = �_� . "= r=� =.31� C �� _ =z - � � ° � � f = - - == - � _� �� 3 �� ° O j �� ; _ � - _ �= ; e�_ �.-� � .YrY � ' ` � � � � ��- _ �:' �-= K .. I . � �T �_ a�.. _ _ :r� .. _ ��. .,p �� . . � �0 , __ _ _ _ _ � � ��- .. ^�_-- � j �i'=.. �L�C�" C �� C �� 5�� ,•tt �� '�' � / ' � "� �i��, S M � N �"':i�.S`C '1�.� ....# .1.. ...,�= / i — y� - � .� • : '��..'L ... ~ SS y C� " Y f — � - v � � I I .. � _ _ .o' . I /' - - r �jREET MAP-CITY'OF � � � -�-- ,, � � ..� _: � � . � FRiDLEY� _ - . .. p . - ._. --.�— .r.. �,......_.._ W��` � - � _� ,- ii ORDINANCE N0. A1V ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEY� AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE � The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. For the vacation of the street described as all that part of Marshall Street lying north of 37th Avenue described as follows: That portion of Marshall Street north of the north right of way line of 37th Avenue N.E. and south of the north line of the S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 34, T-30, R-24, Anoka County, be and is hereby vacated, except that the City of Fridley retains utility easements over the entire portion herein being vacated. SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of City Code shall be so a.mended. PASS�D BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, THIS DAY OF ATTEST: , 1969. CI Y CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell First Reading: Second Reading: Publish . . . . MAYO�? - ,��.� , ir am .�:1 / �r� ' . ;J� /f /� J;i ' � i _ � , /' _ ' � � i� ( �r--_> ' r� /+ � " J _-{ �•�; . . i �, � � . 1 •�'�, N (� , i/, • J i� �' . . � �y / • �' / �• 7 0 � r �; .` � t ,`'f'� i '� i i ' i .� .y — .__. _. . __ Ji f i�7',_� . -..._ _ "'j-"' _" . 9' . Y:i _ �fi; L,! �� j .� ; �� : ..� �,�`IN � ��1 ' I ' � � .�,. c' . la I`, , ,w �� iy �� `y . �� ,u /r , f .% � � .,� � . �---T . ._ . .1. )_..__. _. --� --r 7 i' � ,, ^. di � ..S' . „ _ • ' 9'• � ,,; I - -- --- ---_. ./�%S"C; , ,:9�', l\�r--r-_.------ � / f.:r:•�-, .,ro l :.> f — � . f �t� ' . 1, :.ifi' . ,. � :.�: , � ` �/�:� �,l ' 1 �1 , � �A.C.� i J,". .•' /c?C�: y� I. Of �Sfi.Y./ '��if J'. "" - / / / . /•,v.• .Z.�7lr�a-. . __._'__:� - . _ _ , --- ,- . _ Z _ . P :��l:� j�f } _ � . . r'� . .f _ � J.�.l j . �....' _. _ "_' __"'." ' " • -� _ e _ _ /� .` y �rr:_>;c, :z�.,.�-, .f, ,�' I�+ � I �i i� ( � �� ' ` �� . ;r� I �� '> , , R 1� � , � t i ��/ `�� ' /i � V YY.r.'r_� - Ji /,�� ; ri;; �l �i �ti t� \� �� / ` � � � `� / `� (` `^^ _/ � `�' ��l r� I l.l 1 - t-� (:� ... `� �..� , ,% 1�� a •„ /' ) �"1 t .. . . '.'O�C ' : f 94 �:orf.!�Pr,-:- i:_ii,:F �� . � % � P. T � � �i,�'• S3. e P�.neo hc: p sT e� �• � r. � � � ' ti.. , � 1 �'a. ( �.� �.-- �� w � � �i., �, i�� C) �`�, . 1 � � � I � � -� i � : ,� � , :..� ; .- �:� . - La ' . � i - �; �� _ 'S .� y, ��; f, : , 'z-t -_ � . � .. , , .. - � �` � I r`,9a\ V A � A'i' j D n� j \ J G%� : E:• _.c.�r��- � _;�� s ^ � �� .� . _ . . , ; .. . . � �� . �, .. , .1 , -- �-�------ . �. _ ... � - ._ __ �...--- • •� ... .... - - -�- --------------- =-4"-'_z_.'.. `'. - - - --- - ` � =` 1 � " � ��ioo. :i�''/: f '--'----- � -- - ° - �\� . J � �..� �.!. � �.a J!;' � ..%'� � _ '' ' '' -- � , , ` ' . . I i � � - � �s `r:-rer Q�'?_,. - .. � �:':nt . . �� :.�m 7j `' , o � � f � , � +.-J oi �--_ . � ' . q� 1 i � a - i �^`.. �n. !i ��1 ' � C7 �, � � 'S �' ` � � �� . . o • ., a6 _ ,.. , _ f ..-. , \J ' j `r \' - • . '� ` h 4 :; ; .+ � � . � - .� �tlY�-v•l,' i \ . I � -/.�__ �� . ' �_ � �. A ? '" `' ` �1� � . . � - � Ci.�ar : • i.,.,.r, d � �, ' 1' .��, 'r ��' 1I�i ;� <.:' . . . - • �ti I f E- i.' � � , i � ', : � , �i •� �'1 � r • - t' �t ' �' � `'' � . ' I --.,.. . ..,..,,.. _ . - - - - - - `� • � � 'U ``'` SY . 7r/S.;'7 �� 1 • .-.�. -' ` . ". ...�.-..,._._� ,......�__._ .. �.. ., � � . . f _ � . . _� ' _ _ _ " - („ . . . .. o � . . ... . . �/T�_ .. V . . _..� ._ /...v��._._.�.� "... . v _ ..,. r _ _ ' .._ _ � �ij n f� � � ��.,�• •�i .�l /.1.�:f/ � v.J« �_ ..•1�/ . __...............,...�... � ..... .:� :/ ". _�.�-_�_�_.__. /`. . . 1, \ � \.`, `�:y_�. J L Jr � . 'i .t � � /a•Jd � r r . / 1} • J ` ,4 � - / ` . . � . *,r \ . � �`Ii;� �.>. /��? :�. ��i'�'�� .___... �. I.'.s�.>. _-i,..r .. . .. - , �� • . � � RESOLU7ION h0. � - 19G9 ' � �1�i , A R�SOi.�TIOrf CO�R�CTI�dG R�SOLUTIOF� �JO. 18$-1968 AUTNORIZI��G AND DIRE�TI«G TFiE SPLITTIrdG OF SPECIAL ASSFSS,�'_NTS OPJ PARC�L 8400, PART OF SECi'IO�S 3, A PORTIO�� OF W'lICN IS R=- � PLATTE D I«TO P£ARS�J;v � S S£COND ADDITION � ' bJt�'Eft�AS, c�rtain spe�ial ass�ssments have been levied with respect to certain land an� sai d t ant( has suLs��r�n� 1 y be�n suuds ��? cfed, NOW, TM"cRc�ORF, SE IT RESOLVcD as foTlows: That the assE�sments Tev�ed ag�inst the fo�lowing describ�:1 p�rcel, to wit; , Pat�el 8�00� Part of S�ction 3, a partion of which is replGtted inta Pearson's 2nd Addition, may and shat] b� apportion�d and divided as fotio�:vs: Originat Parc�l Par��l 8400, Part of Sectio� 3 Di_vi si �sn of Parcei Ap�roved Lot T, Slock 1, Parcel 10, Pearson's 2nc� Addition Lot 2, Block 1, Parce�l 100, Pearson� s 2nd Ad�i; ii on Outlot A, 81ock 1, Pearsa�'s 2nd Addition Pa�c�l �400, Part of Section 3 .I , • Fund Reguiar S.A. (Partial S�wer N�ai n) SW n13 iWater and S�.rrr Mains) SW #b5 (:Jater and Sew:ar Laterats and 2 Water ar�d 2 Sewer S�rvic.^_s on 77fih Avenue) sr. 19b�-t (77tn a��„ue} Fund Regular S.;,. (Qarti �:1 Sswer Main) SW i#13 {Water and Sewer Mai ns) Sw #b5 (Water and S�w�r Laterats and 2 W�ter and 2 Sewcr Services on 77th Avenue) ST. 1964-1 (77th Avenue) Regulas S.A. (Partial Sewer Main) SW #13 (Water and Sew2r Mains) Regular S.A. (Partial S�Wer Main SW #i13 (�iater and Sewer Mains) Regular S.A. (�ar:ial Sewer hfai n � SW ,�13 (Water and S�wer Mains) Original Am�unt $ 1,461.74 9,303.70 1,780.36 1,603.8� 1 ,1 9� Or i gi n<� ;�,moun t $ 126.56 832.98 1,780.3G 1,603.89 .S 143.52 938.97 $ 46. b3 333.37 S 1,1 �5. 03 7,198.:8 1 �,1� PAGE 2 RESOLUTiOtJ N0. l" - 1968 �2 .. A RESflLUTIOFi CORRcCTiP1G RcSOLtJTIGfi; P;O. 183-ts�8 AUTHORIZIDIG ANO DIRECTIt�lG TN� SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMc�TS ON PARCEL 8400, PART OF S�CTION 3, A POP.TION OF 1+'fiICH IS RE- PLATT�D IrIT4 PEARSOii� S SECOPiO ADDITION � Q � ADOPTED BY Tiic CITY COUhCTL GF THE CITY OF F'RIDLEY THIS � DAY OF � , , 1968. ��\ 1�� r MAYOR .lack 0. Kirl:ham ATTEST: CI7Y CLcRiC Marvin C. Brunsell January 15, 1969 City of Fridle� 6431 TTniversity Ave. N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Gentlemen: � l�Je hereby petiti.on the City Council to Improve ttie Service Road to City Standards on the west side of T.H. #47 from Osborne Road north approximately 150U feot. This pro ject wo�Ald be in con,junction with the development of t�e property and "Bob�s Produce Ranch." G:le are the owners of all the frontage for this petition. Thankin�;,you for th`s and past cooper- atiori. Si�cyre v, ,. �� ' � �,.�� .� �`� . `..--.�_ Hobert Schroer East Rancn �states, lnc. fs �c� �`�: LIST OF CON'1'RACTOR'S LICENSE TO BE APPROVED By COUNCIL AT THE MEETING OF JANUARY 20 1969 GAS APPROVED BY Bruce Plumbing Co. 4747 T�ain Lake Ave . North � Minneapolis, Minnesota By; Delbert Bruce RENBWAL Plbg. Insp. Sassco, Inc. 475 8th Ave. New Brighton, Minnesota By: Robert Jenson NEW Htg. Insp. GENERAL CONTRACTOB Lund-Martin Co. 3023 Randolph St. N. E. Minneapolis, Minneasota By; Clifford Lund NEW Bldg. Insp. flBATING Sassco, Inc. 475 8th Ave N. W. New Brighton, Minnesota By: Robert Janson NEW Htg. Insp. LTCnit��?,5 TO 8��, 4�P��J'Ji?,n AT T'�^ J:�Pdi?.!1RY 20� 1959, CL'�J'?CIL ';'.-;ETI?�JG CT�"..-3R�TTE BY APPRO;T'�D BY P�ietro 500 5333 University :1ve. Frid].ey, ?�Iinnesota CAFE Colonial House 62'15 University Ave. Frid.ley, i�Iinnesota. C9iJDY VENnzN^ :��C�. �ietro 500 5333 University Ave. Fridley� '=Ii:�neso-F,a: O�d� OFF S �Lh� Club !�7 606I University ^ve. Fridley, '•�linnesota N'L�� ?aul Castonguay N�;J Paul Ban,y tdE',7 i�'�`y'T Paul Castonguay 3illy t�on �iarpole Dolice Chief Health 2ns,�ector Health Inspector Police Chief Health �nspector �:l C L A I M S GENERAL LIQUOR No. 17079 through No. 17220 No. 2902 1 through No. 2972 �� E;STl"MA7�S TO B� APPItOVED BY �IiE CtTY COUNCIL - JAI4UARY 20, 1�69 Dunkley Surfacing Company 3756 Grand Street Northeast Minneapolis, Minnesota Estimate - Street I�nprovement Project ST. 1968 - 1B and MAS Street Zmprovem�ent Project ST. 1968 - 2B 1968-1B $ 38,244.13 1968-2B 13,645.66 Karl Dedolph Construction Co. 771 West 7th Street St. paul, Minnesota 55102 Estimate ��3 for work completed this date tor General and Electrfcal Work - Remodeliag in Civic Center according, to contract. Park Department $ � 515.47 Bldgs. Fund 409.51 $ 1,880.00 Comstock and Davis, Inc. Consulting Engineers 1446 County Road ".7" Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 Estimate No. 1(FINAL) for work and services provided for Sewer Extension - Lambert's Addition £rom October 14, 1968 through December 14, 1968. $ 56,889.79 $ 2,395.47 $ 856.84 �S% ' ' 1 ' GOMST�f:K & �AVIS, ?NC. �ansiaZting Engi�eers 1446 County Road "J" .iixrneapolis, Minuesota SS432 December 20, 1968 ' Houorable Mayor � City Caunc�l CIO MS. Homex bt. Atikxum, Ci�y Maa�ag�r Ci�y a� �ridleq ' 6431 Universit�* Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Afinnesot� 55421 ' ceutl�en: � , ' CERTI�IC.ATE OF THE ENGINEER We herewith submit Bsti�ate �do. l, the final estimate, for work and services provided for Sewer Ex�easion - Lamber�'s Addition from October I4, 1968 through DecembeY 1.4, 1968. 3-i%2 hours by G. Sarrie @$3.60 $ 12.60 3-�/2 hesurs by J. Kexsten @$2.86 10.01 3-�j2 hours by S. Pe3.ckeYCt @$2.50 S.TS 4? lhours by E. Westea�eper @�4.02 188.94 19 ho�crs bq R. Johnson @$�.62 $7.78 10 houscs bq W. Osufsen @$3.24 32.40 6 hours by R. Murph� @$b.62 27.72 Direc� Lahor Co�t $368.20 Multiplier sub-Total � honxs by E. o. CaQStoek @$7a8f3 Direct Labor Cost z.a � $810.04 23.4U $ 23.40 $810.04 HulCiplier 2.0 Sub-Tota]. $46.80 46.8Q �_ AMOUNT NOW DUB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $856. 84 $VC/�g Rsspectfully submitted, COI�LSTOCK & DAViS, INC. Bp B. V. Camstock, P. E. �� ' ' ' � ' �� ' , ' ' ' 'J � ' C ' � 600U WEST MOQRF LAKE DRIV�, FRInLEY. �AIP�NE�.OTA 5542i / 5�50-6100 January 16, 1969 Mr. Homer Ankrum City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Dear Mr. Ankrum: DR. JOHN K. HANSEN SUPERINTENDENT JAMES H. HEDREN DIRECTOR BUSINESS AF�AIRS JAMES G. PAPPAS DIRECTOR ELEMENTANY EDVChTION Please advise the Fridley City Council that the Board of Education of District 14 at its regular January meeting unanimously passed the following resolution: Resolved that the City of Fridley is requested to conetruct sidewalks along the East River Road to provide a safe walking access to the Steven- son and Riverwood Elementary Schools. It is also requested that a flashing school crossing signa,l be installed at a echool crossing near the Stevenson School. The most critical need and the greatest saving can be achieved by the construction of sidewalka on both sides of the street from Stevenaon School north to Mississippi St-�et. Our annual cost for transporting children from thie area is approximately �5, 000. , 'Sidewalks from Rice Creek to Glen Creek would reault in a aavinge of about $2, 500 since some of the children using them are already re- quired to walk to Riverwood School. They would, however, provide a safer and more convenient accese to the school. Cordially yours, w-�..v�-� � Ja''mea H. Hedren Director of Buainess Affairs JHH/hj ', P.S. Signals would be necessary to accrue the $5,000 sav�gs indicated above JHH `� � ' �� ' �I �� ..� � ��8��.�, I��. ' Commercial and Industrial Real Estaie 2620 North Major ' Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Phone: 588-4544 588-5363 J�:;�l��ry l3, l�E; � � �� 1 J J � ' , ' � ' ' ' ' ' ' � t�oncr��,le _�,�;cr, ��:�a _.er°.;.�e�°s o �� ;i�e Oo-�:nci.l ";' -i;i:e Ci-c.y o:?' _ ri.c� � e;; �. e� t1e; :e� : �'le� se e advi_se tr�,t �_ �:r s_',r� 1.�tir_� to :,r_e ; lanr,in� cor..miss_cr_ �f �'r�.e C�t;T c_ _'ridlez; � cor�,��le�e �rci.�_�ec�.�...r�l l�yoti�; ;•�7ir� �.l�rs ior �he zcn�:n` to �_-? :::,;lti.;c�le c" �y and 2�, acres lec� �eo ��; `7tr� �;e b; �1: ::ve_�r:e -'ori;i i�� t, � lso 1�-�?o--m �-s �`o•�.r �;; �c:sd �i, cor:snencin� � T s i,o;nt 1,000 ._`eet. .:est r. • C� Jt��.T?SO?1 ��,TC�.� irET1CP. -c'•Sl, �:1!'�T!` �j��"i l,. .��T.:�"!SOi1 �:r:i. i'1I^@Ci;1�;T SO�' 'Y: C .. i,�}.. i , �-��: � J., t'r..c ,�_�c _Uler. '�r�r p].e�:t�. �.r.cv,n � �rc�]_s 10 ar_.� 20C. � i�Z,ror _M�, i,e1.-:� GO � c�r�s � re �U i1 •'-,' -, ;,,- � r;;_; r: r+� c � �_ i- ��: �� _'or s� �., 7-u'i - s�L. ; o..e., . _:e l`�lc'"?Ce C`� 1:° FCiE �'c T c'1Cr' 15 ?'�v^L�'1 cr'_Ci S011th O' :Cc ��1"Ec�:� TdG vTil_.l E'� l�".E%` C f,.^. u T�.O ''i;_ e' 1�,j �' `� . Y' _.G� �'�� .^._ �: SE �ile � Y'U'.`.Ef i��T ? pY' ?:�='1�T2 i,2 _ _ . ."cY':. �t"G -,;C�iiC crE�i. i .:° :i�?^E SC: �� .'12O ':f. 2;:��C'F I^ _ErC',-,�' i,:-c -C�c'1„7i_n, �:;.17'.�.SS1C1� �'cCl ;c *'tr 'Z3! 1- ` >� a_ !1i7 � i'„� -�,� -j j;G 7.�;�;� Qi �,.'�r'l? %.}_° ;i1.c `t"11.,'^?. CCl?:C�'�..Sl t:'T? !:: V2 jE.'ti Lr:@ �:P.c Y"_Y`;: ?OY' ..`�:�;`cT'. ��'-I1� 1.'�C/• _ .. _. `,e r)G+!G ��7:'?�i7Cit1= � i^T'�_'"��'fCi IO2 S'_"'1:^,�; CG°�StT'l'C'�lOY•.� t'fi2IE:�G1"c i�:� ,�Ci'�C� �'.I�:_E.' irJ �E'�, _?�'1 'ii.° CC.'Y'iC_�_' � �.f:"G2 £S .,:'C y -� ' ...,,�.-. _ -;-�.., r. � _s=:-le �i:•er �.�._ �:r�,� �:.;.r. �::e Tc:el c:;riic�ert ��'�e _rel:r.�r�.�r;r c:;r_ie-re�ce� '.,;.�t o�:r °1��zw �:�c �c 'C'L'' � l. �� C�, c` �'c i' Li:�;"1.t L'r' 1 V.�. � C C.!� l E''�E �.� l tI! %COi � _� 2'�' :°S � `1� I'�i'� ?1;" 7 E�:7'GE'�°� �:,"'G£Cc: i'.^,`.� c1_'?C� 2'�C�"('-.c �:.0?`_ �re�: ,.,---111�?G cCC2j��;Ci!.; �G Lrie ;%1 c'1'71^_" C GT..,._.: S� C� . .LY1 Gi)t Oy:l;1i0:1 �•I:15 _�2T? _�CY' �iiE 7'.��E G=� iil=E' Z_2'^� =S v'f_E �1�f,P:,: i: cr:C :��s�� t�se �cr tr�.e :e�e_'it o_.' t�_e ill�:;e e_' ='rit;le:T. .:e � _ ��r�ei.� i:.e �o•w_ c or_,; �c;e.ru ticl; �n ih:_s r�_� -�ter. � Si�cerel;:, �:o^e:�rcaJ ��li�, _-'c. �Tt � � � C �J., - L . � � v t. " �. / � " ( • /% : = / • �; c �� :i 1��::� : � % /� �<< /- .. �� i �� ' ' � � ' ' ' � � ' ' u ' � ' �', I� � GFi�T N4F1'I'MBRN Careat NQrth�rn f��ilw�y �Am�any / 1 15 F-ist Fourth Str�et i Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 / Phont� el � 22Q-5588 Land and Tax psr�artrn�nt I�fx'. Nasim M. Qureshi Ci�ty Engineer City A� Fridley P"x�i.dley, Minnesota, 55�+21 ,Dear Mr. Qux'eshi: Januasy 9, 1969 File 9313-F Conaerning the applications dated pugust 19, 1968 for �the platting oP our �ndustrial park and the construction of utilities vithin the propoaed initial roadway carIInonly called "Tract "J" and the davelopment egre�nent entered into by the City of Fridley and the Gre�t �Torthern Railway Coarpar�y governing the development of the �.ndustrial park; �'lease proceed With the final d�sign speciPications, estimates and �lazie and. arrange for the construction of the follo�wing municipal utilities and roadway for the first stage of th� develapment: l, Storm sewer cqnsistir:� of a 5�" outfall pipe located in the souther],y portior. of Tract "J" and a 2�+" extension wi.th appurtenances for appraximately 350 Feet northeasterly� as shown in Canstoc�c ard Davis supplement to preliminaty report dated November 2y, 1968. 2. Storm seWer consisting of 24" and 18" pipe w�th appwrtena,nces extend3ng frt�m the end of No. 1 above northeaster�,y for about 1360 feet ae shown in sai3 supplement to preliminary report. �. 3anitary sewer line and liPt station 3n TraCt "J" as sha�m �n said supplement to preliminary report. �+. ].2 inch water main fram Main Street to the souther�y end of Tract "J", as shown in said supplement to prelitninary report. 5• Roedway over Tract "J" consisting of up to 3" bit�i.nous base, 36 feet wide and concrete curb and gutter on the northwesterly side and the construction of the approach and crossover to East River Road at the southerly end of Tract "J". �. R. Sf:Vf .�v ',i I,u & Ta• �. m�svc�n s �� . ..H.l,Nne �I id> � � � 11. E. FRFv A;sL L�nU h ld. �� i. icner N. �� ( ��.��VI l �eial �a J�� .r�q 3. J . , �. C,.. .ri. L,�n�. , • �_� ' 1 GREAT NORTN@RN � � JanuarY 9, 1969 Mr. N. M. Qureshi Page 2 Please have the 2�+" and 18" storm sewer mentioned in item No. 2 abave included as an alternate wi�een lettiz�g this project for bid.s. According to tkye development contract the Railw�y Cao�ar�r is to reviev the final plar�s and speciftcationa prior to construction, and upon campletion they should ee sent to I�. M. P. 9chindler, Division ffi�gineer for the Great Northara Railvay Cc�npar�y, at the Great Northeru Depot, Eaat Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55�1, for review and final approval. After �the bids are received, We would appreciate the cypportunity to revieW th� in order to detennine if tYie alternate storm se�wer should be conatructed. Yours very trtL�y, ./r � � d and Tax Ca�iasioner cc; Mr. H. R. Ackrla�� City Engineer Comstock & Davis 14k6 County Road "J" Mianeapolis, Minnesota, 55�32 � �� C ' 1 ' �I C_J l_ J ' ' � ' ' �fiads uf .�lii�cnesota �e�ttr#men# of fdiilil �e#ense VETERANS SERVICE BUILDING �D ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 35101 221-2233 �� danuarY 3, 1969 Honprable J. 0. Kirkham l�or of Fridlsy City Ha71 P�idley, Minaesota 5543z Dear Nayor Kirkhams The Area Commande�, Mr. William F�ynn, haa informed me your Gfril DeYenae director, Mr. Robert Aldrich, has me� the ��*+i�� requireaents for ca�tification as preaaribed under tbis program Yor riscal year 19b9• To beoome certiYied it is necessary to have completed prescribed training conrsos in Civil Defense subjects. Cartification of a Civil Defenae direator is one of ss�resal requirements Yor partiaipation in Fedaal assistance programs. (The.other requirements sre aubmissioa oY ea approved Civil DeYense program paper, an app,roved Civil Defense ��'B��Y Pl�, aad compliance with civil rights provisions. ) Th• Federal aasistanae programs include: Personnel and Administration �enses ' Coz�tributions for Civil De�ense Equipmerit and Facilities Contributions Por Student F.�enses Acquisition of 5urplua Property ' � , I_J , ' I strorigly feal that a dir�ctor who haa met ths �i ni m�vn r��.��a for ce�rtification has been provided with the key to prcmots a more effective Givil Defense grogram in his aonmuniby. 3incere�,y Phillip A. Iverson Director PAI:sk ca: William Flynn 8obert Yldrich �� '. � ' ' ' I , , Jan. 1l�, 1969 Mayor Kirkha� . �ounci]�an Ray She ridan Councila�a I�ank Liebl Councilx�an David Aarris Councilman Leonard Seauelaon Gea#lenen: I Wish to confinn n� verbal atand giv�en Monday evening January 13, 1969 as being against the proposed storn sewer project No. 80. I feel �i the propoaed pmject is recom�endrd, it vould be unfair, unjust and discriainatory in coet tc: people oi 1rMdl�y in tr� propos�d area. Our area has never had a storm sewer problea end xould not receiv�e ar�q benefits for the cost imrested by each fa�i],q. I can not see hav any councilaian could recwunend snnch a project---- if t�is project is accepted as reconm►ended---I KN(7�1 nqr opposition vill be reflected in the next general elec+.ion for coundlmsn as a vote for your opponent. Respectfully Yours� , �-- . � _ -� CC •�:� t %-- � Ise walter 6361 Quiacy Street N.E. Fric�ey, Minneaota 55�t21 �� ' �.`� �� 420 GIRARD AVENUE NORTN • MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS�OS • TEI. 374-3111 PENNZONE ANTIFREEZE PENNCOAT UND�RCOAT P�NNpMATIC A. T. F. ZEREX - Z�RONE Jan. 15, 1969. � Mr. Nsaim M. Qureshi, P. E. City of Fridley, Fridley Civic Center, 6431 University Ave. N.E., Fridley, Minn. 55/+zl. Dear Mr. Qureshi: Encloeed is a sketch of our property on which w�e intend to build. The proposed service drive xould eerve no one; as we will occupq all of the frontage on the service drive. Ther�fore, ve would like to request that this be omitted from your improvement project �969 — 1. RJH tt+s enc. Yours very truly, P�`1NSYL'J�iDiIA OIL C01�ANY �� R. Jt��Haaa uh �Qhf{�eh -- �IOf �Ouh CO�ti��fifOh ��..�_.._._.. m�—=�..._� .— . � � � , i � f . . � ' � ; � � � � . � ,� � � - i�•� + : i �; ' , ' ' ' - _. . . � ! �� Y ' �T �I .'r� � � ' -- — - -- - _ �� :.�, � -- - 3 _ - ---- s ' j j - �� _i_ 1; _ . _ _ _ ----_--_—.�__�----__ __ ---- . - - . _ . , _ l ' , �. �� . _ '-q.-. �_ f IZ r �, �� ! `' � F, r; -� i-�_� SO �_ i _ _ .. .. . ` � ' • - -- _ _. _.-......_+�,.,�,� - � +.. ''�• ! f� �', j `'�/•I _ � � . � -�_�"'�_'. � • i .._.r � .. , � . _ . _ � � , . � _._,._. .. i �-- - - _ _.. . �_--- � ._.___ Y - �_ _ __ , - : - - ! rC " �.. __ _ ._�. _. ' � �- . - --- __ ..�, , 2 , . � �..._ _�. � , . ___. : . -,--�— � ___ ____ :--.-- � � , � � .. - .. _. �... __ � � -- ' , ' j � _ � � ! � ` ( ' ---- -- ' ( , . i j � f � . . � � . ' ' � �. ` . . � . ' � � �. . E � � . ._ : � . �a � � � , �1. 1�- �il t� . ' � � v � �� ' v► o � � �•� � � • ' � � " + ; , ;. � ' � � . � ,., � � c.� 1, ' � , , , __ :�" : = �. 1:J i `; ) _' ' � � r . .- � ; : ,, _ _ -� _.. . ,• ' � , � - - � rl.l • � ------ .— � �1_.__'___'_.__.� I � � ._ ' � ♦ � -' O, jt -->,. _ . ' � , / � • , . 1 � ' ' ' � � , f i � � i ; t , ;_:._ , _� 5� � i r � 1 ' u C 1 ' ' ' 1 , � � �, , , LJ LJ ' ' ' T0; FROM: Ci�o rid�e � � 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N� ANOKA COUNTY January 17, 1969 560-3450 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council The Fridley Human Relations Committee SUB.TECT; Letter of Recognition of Hans P. Meyerhoff Since it is the stated publi�c policy of the City of Fridley by Resalution of the City Council to: "Pravide for the recognition of the mattex of human relations within the community as a matter of proper cpncern of the City Government"; and sinc� it xs a stated duty of the Human R�lations Committee to: "Recommend to the Mayox and Gouncil from time to time su�h actions as caay seem advisable in creating better human relations and to carry out the policy of the City", it i.e reaommended that suitable recognition be given to a Fridley Resident, �lans P�ter Meyerhoff, who has devoted of his own time and energy to further Che bettertnent of human relations between citizens of Fridley and black busiqesses. He has received national recognition for these efforts and in thi.s way has brought credit to the City of Fridley as well as himself. Honeywell, Inc., Mr. Meyerhoff's employer, should also be coar�nended for releasing him from his regulat duties for this endeavor. �� , �'�, u ' MONTHLY REPORT TO THE CITY MANAGER DECF�'IBII3 � 968 1 ' I�J ' �� BLACRTOPPING EXCAVATING GAS GEL�TII3AL HEATING HOIISE MOVING NIASONRY OIL HEA'.FING PLASTERING ROOFING SIGNS WELL DRILLING NUMBER OF LICENSES CURRENTLY IN EFFECT . AND LICENSE FEES COLLECTID TO DgTE NUMBII3 FEES COLLECTID 9 � �35 22 330 - 38 570 115 2�875 52 780 2 30 28 420 6 go 7 �05 1 15 12 300 1 15 �293 �5,665 PEftMIT FEES 1g68 1967 �HIS YEAR LAST YEA,R PERMIT NIIMBERS TYPE DECII�IBII3 DECIIKBF� TO DATE TO DATE #��,045-#10,072 BUILDZNG $�,178 � 436 �45,401 �36,200 #75�0-#7546 ELECTHICAL 1,23� 425 �2,802 10,6�2 #434�-#4357 x��rzrrc 297 i,226 ' i6,e42 9,095 #4796-�4804 PLUNBING �76 509 10,191 6,064 SIGNS 120 25 1,091 3,727 $3,002 �2,621 �86,327 �65,69s , � L1 1 C�' Cit� of FridTey, 1K5.xmesota Office of the Building Inspector TOPIC: MONTHLY REPORT TO THE CITY MANAGER DEC F�'IBII3 , 19 68 ' �'YPE OF CONSTRUGTION Residential ' Residential Gara.ges Alterations & Additions Multiple Dwellings ' Commercial Industrial Municipal Churchea & Schools ' Hospitals Signs Moving ' CJ � ' • �• �IUMBER OF PII�MITS ISSUID r 1968 1967 Txzs � DECEI�lBEEt DECII�ER TO DATE LAST YE� TO DATE 6 5 167 140 2 3 io5 103 7 3 123 136 4 0 �0 3 3 3 �5 12 0 0 9 5 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 � 33 ` 40 0 1 2. 28 16 4` ° 453 Heating 17 30_ 303 250 Plumbing 9 �4 300 257 Electrical 37 40 546 . 520 63 94 _1��9 �027 ' Residential ' Residential Garagea Alterations & Additions Multiple Dwellings ' Commercial Industrial Municipal C,hurches & Schools ' Hospitals ; Signs Moving ' �l 1 ESTIMATID VALUATION OF BTJILpING P�EtM�T� ISSIIID �137,600 �1o6,?�a. �3,626,700 �2,702,475 3,500 7,4ao �i76,�59 158,412 68,050 3�,500 _584,�2 344,3�4 975,000 o i,4o7,000 1,o3b,000 �55,000 300_; 2,53�,860 1,�74,775 0 0- 1,685;700 6,809,000 0 0- 6i5,000 6,500 0 0 0 1,103,000 0 �' 0 0 >>875 30� ` 3�,695 36,110 0 20 ' 00 8 20 �1,34i,025 xi4 ,22o Eio, 57�3�� xi3,379,�06 , ' I ' 8-79 (REV. 11-3-64) � (Standard Form of the International Association of Chiefs oF Police) (Copies cvoilable at Federal Burcau of Investigation, Washington, D. C. 20535) CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT ��t� ,f _-_—_�'Y�Z�E.'� Month oc December ,`rs(L8 TABLE 1..-DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL Average Dail,y Percent Daily Averoge Doily Numerical Strength Absence Absence Temporary Details ' Average Effective Strength En�i-of >amemonth Samnmonth �Samemonth Samemonth - Same month � 'his r.;anth � la, t yoar This mont last year "1'his month last year 'I'his mont last year This month Last month last year �ibt�1E.�.r_,�nrn•L � 2 '!,f��:'s off3�-�� . _ ___�, H�•cords 6ur<�,ru . I Ir,lfr>t7ne•d foice, . �� D•.t��ctiv�� bur�•au _� "I'ra(flc bumnu . F•�r.e rE�l��r . . . g Second rellef . . p Thlyd rellef . . . � � TABLE 2.--CHANGES IN PERSONNEL 1. Present for duty end of last month . . . . . . . . . . 2. Recrult�.�d durinq month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Relnstated durSn�; month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . To[altoaccount fot,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, � 4. SPparatlons from the servlc�; (a) Voluntary reslqnatlon . . . . . . (b) Retlrement on pensia� . . . . . (c) Heslqned with charqes pendinq (d) Dropped durinq probation . . . . (eJ Dlsmissed for cause . . . . . . (f ) Killed (n line of duty . . . . . . i9) Deceased . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total separations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 5. PtPSent for duty at end oE month . . . . . . . . . . . _ TABLE 3.--DAILY AVERAGE PATROL STRENGTH G4 Same month This month last year I. Total number of patrolmen . . . . . . . . ' � � 5e5r.� 2. Less petmanent asslqnments (publlc offlces, clerlcal, chauffeurs, etc.) . . . 3. Less detafls to speclal squads or bu- - ' reaus (trafflc, vlce, park, etc.) . . . . . 4. Averaqe daily absences of patrolmen assiqned to patrol duty owinq to: � ia) Vacatlon, suspension, rest � days, et� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �7.45 6.67 (b) Sick and Sn)ured'. . . . . . . . . . . . • ( l •3� (c) Temporary detalls- . . . . . . . . . . � � Total avemqe dally absences . . ��0� - 5. Avallalite for patrol duty' . . . . . . . . . �� J 0 TABLE 4-- CRIfi�E INDEY AND POLICE ACTIVITY TREND OFFENSES KNOWN TO THE POLICE CHANGE CURRENT YEAR VS. LAST YEAR CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES (PARY i CLASSES) REPORTED OR ACTUAL �S. SAME MONTH VS. SAME PERIOU KNOWN UNFOUNDED OFFENSES ACTUAL THIS LAST YEAR LAST YEAR THIS MONTH THIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE NUMBER PERCENT NUMBER PERCENT la. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER 2. FORCIBLE RAPE TOTAL �- o. RAPE BY FORCE 6. ASSAULT TO RAPE • ATTEMPTS ' 3. ROBBERY TOTAL �' 1 $ o. ARMED - ANY WEAPON l. b. STRONG-ARM - NO WEAPON 3 4. AGGRAVATED ASSAULT TOTAL 1. a. GUN b. KNIFE OR CUT7ING IKSTRUMENT c. OTHER DANGEROUSWEAPON d. HANDS, FIST, ETC. • AGGRAVATED 5. BURGLARY TOTAL 16 �.6 1.52 a. FORCIBLE ENTRY 16 1 b. UNLdWFUL ENTRY • NO FORCE c. ATTEMPTED FORCIBIE ENTRY 6. LARCENY - THEFT (except auto theit) o. S50 AND OVER IN VAWE 2 23 2gl 7. AUTO THEFT 3 1 2 �j� CRIME INDEX TOTAL 16. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE 4e. OTHER ASSAULTS • NOT AGGRAVATED 66. LARCENY, UNDER 550 IN VALUE Ej��j PART I TOTAL Q$ lO 12 1 TOTAL PARTIIINCIDENTS ................Z�...................:.....:......�$.l..... TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS NONCRIMINAL CALLS �kl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�. . ... . . . 5.7f.5G . . . . TOTAL CALLS FOR POLICE SERVICE . . . . �2l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . gff�g . ... AUTOMOBILES RECOVERED (A) NUMBERSTOLEN LOCALLY AND RECOVERED LOCALLY ............................................... O (B) NUMBERSTOIEN LOfALLY AND RECOVERED BY OTHERJURISDICTIONS .................................... 1 (C) TOTAL IOCALLYSTOLEN AUTOSRECOVERED ..................................................... 1 (D) NUMBER.STOLEN OUT OFJURISDICTION,RECOVERED LOCALLY ......................................... 3 . . ' ' LJ I I i� ' ' � �I IJ ' i�l u ' : .'_ ' , ' TABLE 5-- VALUE OF PROPERTY STOLEi� AND RECOVERED VALUE OF PROPERTY VALUE OF PROPERTY VALUE OF PROPERTY TOTAL VALUE OF VA�UE OF PROPERTY STOLEN LOCALLY STOLEN LOCAILY STOLEN OTHER OFFENSE LOCALIYSTOLEN STOLEN LOCALLY ANDRECOVERED ANDRECOVERED BY pROPERTY RECOVERED �URISDICTIONS LOCALLY OTHER JURISDICTION RECOVERED LOCALLY ROBBERY BURGLARY 2 �3 2�„�9�, 21��{. LARCENY 6O . .68 553.6g AUTO THEFT 2$ 0 00 1 00 1 0 00 200.Q0 TOTAL 15239.R1 13z5.6z 1325.bz S200000 TABLE 6�- - OFFENSES CLEARED BY ARREST year to date (include exceptional clearances) NUMBER OF OFFENSES PERCENT OF OFFENSES CLEARED BY ARREST CLEARED BY ARREST CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES BY ARREST OF BY ARREST OF (PART I CLASSES) TOTAL CIEARED pER50N5 UNDER 18 TOTAL CLEARED pERSONS UNDER 18 THIS LAST THIS LAST THIS LAST TH45 - LAST YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR' YEAR YEAR YEAR 1. CRIMINAL HOMICIDE a. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER 6. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE 2. FORCIBLE RAPE TOTAL ]. ]_ a. RAPE BY FORCE 1 1 b. ASSAULT TO RAPE • ATTEMPTS ' 3. ROBBERY TOTAL 1, ]. ]_ c. ARMED - ANY WEAPON b. STRONG-ARM • NO WEAPON 1 1 1 1 4. ASSAULT TOTAL Ej� 1C� g o. GUN b. KN�FE OR CUTTING INSTRUMENT 1 c. OTHER DANGEROUSWEAPON d. HANDS FISTS, FEET, ETC. - AGGRAVATED e. OTHER ASSAULTS-NOT AGGRAVATED 5. BURGLARY TOTAL lO G o. FQRCIBLE ENTRY g 6 b. UNLAWFUL ENTRY - NO FORCE c. ATTEMPTED fORCIBLE ENTRY' 1 • 6. IARCENY - THEFT (EXCEPT AUTO THEFT) �� . �ry S g _ _ a. E50 AND OVER IN VALUE ! b. UNDER S50 �N VALUE 350 229 �-05 �� 7. AUTO THEFT ]. 3$ � 32 ` GRAND TOTAL 2 3�z 227 �2 - � ' , , ' ' I ' � ' ' � ' I ' I � I ' ' ` . ' ' ' Tp►BLE 7-- PE4�SOi�S AF�RESTED, CHARGED /�ND DISPOSED OF DURIi�G IVIONTH PERSONS COURT DISPOSITIONS THIS MONTH ARRESTS FORMALLY (INCLUDE RELEASED NO FORMAL CHARGE) ADULTSGUILTY UNIFORM CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES CHARGED ACQUITTED REFERRED TO j , THIS OR JUVENILE MONTH OF OF OTHERWISE COURT � JUVENILES ADULTS TOTAL � ' TOTAL OFFENSE IESSER DISMISSED JURISDICTION . - CHARGED� OFFENSE I 1. CRIMINAL HOMICIDE: a. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER b. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE 2. FORCIBLE RAPE ' � 3. ROBBERY � 4. AGGRAVATED ASSAULT � 5. BURGLARY • BREAKING OR ENTERING 2 ,2 'Z � 6. LARCENY • THEFT (EXCEPT AUTO THEFT) lg I 7. AUTO THEFT I 8. OTHER ASSAULTS (RETURN A- 4e) 2 2 ], 1 � TOTAL - PART I CLASSES 2,Z 2O L}2 3 J.7 ! THIS YEAR TO DATE O 1 O I. � �O LAST YEAR TO DATE 1 Z g 209 136 �{.5 1 � 1. � PERCENT CHANGE 9. ARSON 10. FORGERY AND COUNTERFEITING 11. FRAUD 12. EMBEZZLEMENT 13. STOLEN PROPERTY; BUYING, RECEIVING, POSSESSING 14. VANDALISM l l I 15. WEAPONS; CARRYING, POSSESSING, ETC. I 16, PROSTITUTION AND COMMERCIALIZED VICE 17. SEX OFFENSES (EXCEPT 2 AND 16) 18. NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS 19. GAMBLING I 20. OPFENSES AGAINST THE FAMILY AND CHILDREN 21. DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE �, 22. LIQUOR LAWS 2 � 23. DRUNKENNESS 7 24. DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2 ,2 2 25. VAGRANCY i 26. ALL OTHER OFFENSES (EXCEPT TRAFFIC) 5 TOTAL - PART II CLASSES 7 _ 21 20 2I{. 1( µ 3 I TMIS YEAR TO DATE 1. 2 1.9 35 2 2 LAST YEAR TO DATE ' �Ej O 22 1,57 1 l PERCENT CHANGE TRAFFIC ARRESTS THIS MONTH PNYSICAL CUSTODY ARRESTS WARRANTSSERVED 3 1 CITATIONS ISSUED O 2 2 52 5 TOTAL TRAFFIC ARRESTS AND CITATIONS Ej2 GEj EjG 5S 1 6 �I. � 8-79a (Rev. 10-21-65) CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPOR-T TRAFFIC SUMMARY � Police Department City ot' _ Fridley Moarh ot _ December , 19 (g TABLE l. ACCIDENT SUMMARY his Month Year to Date This Year L,ast Year o�o Change This Year Last Year o�o Change Accident Total gb 71 +� 5gl 55� +� Fatal - 2 1 + Personal Injury 2g 29 �4 �g 2�7 _g Property Damage 5b J�2 -}-3� 3�i� 306 +12 Pedestrian 2 + 6 - 9 �3�F Traffic Total Hazardous Violations Other Violations Parking DNI Accident Arrests and Citations TABLE2. ENFORCEMENTSUMMARY This Month Year to Date This Yeaz Last Yeaz % Change This Yeaz Last Year % Change 43 9i -53 io9s iz6o -i3 33 71 -5G. 632 905 31 5 6 -17 z62 216 +z1 - � � 40 � z7 �+t;� TABLE 3. COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS This Month Year to Date This Year Last Year o�o Change This Yeaz Last Year % Change Total Accidents $6 1 +�. gl � + Fatal Accidents 2 1 + Persons Kilied ,� 3 "3�L Injury Accidents 2$ � z29 z 7 �g Persons Injured � +1 � �16 Pedestrians Killed Pedestrians Injured 2 + 6 1� —f�� Hit and Run Accidents + � 6 +iy2 Cleared by Anest + lo + 2 Cleared - No Anest • � 52 �. +26 Total Eleared 3 5 ��+� 62 i�$ +29 . •. , ' ' , , , I ' I ' � , ' ' ' � � .., ' ' TABLE 4. COMPARATIVE SUMMARY ACCIDENTS AND ENFORCEMENT (By Hovr of Day and Doy of Week) A+londay Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Time dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest 12 M 2 1 l i:oo 1 1 1 2: o0 1 3:00 4:00 _ 1. 5:00 6:00 1 1 1 1 7:00 2 s:oo 1 1 s:oo 1 3 1 1 io: o0 1 1 � 1 ii:oo 1 1 12 N 3 2 1 1 1:00 2 1 2:00 �. 1. �. 1 2 3:00 ]. 1 ]. 1 4:00 2 1 1 2 _ 1 s:oo 1 3 1 3 1 s: o0 1 2 1 �: o0 1 2 1 1 1 s:oo 2 1 1 9:00 1 1 1 1 1 io:oo ii:oo 1 1 Hote: °Citation and Arrest" column should include a�� traffic citations and arrests made during each hour period except parking citations. , � . - 1 , �_ 1 , ' � '� ' ' � � ' , ' ' TABLE 5. COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF ENFORCEMENT (By Violation) This Month Year to Date This Year Last Year This Ye�r Last Year o o Change Hazardous Violations Total , 31+ 7$ 67z 91z -2rf D�v� 1. 7 k0 27 +1�8 Speeding 13 k7 334 63g -4g Reckless Driving � � Careless Driving 6 �% �}�. ia.�j. —rf Traffic Signal %� 69 6b +1� Stop Sign 7 - 4 52 49 +6 Other Regulatory Sign 13 �-6 "�.9 Improper Passing 1 3 �. 'F Improper Turning 1 9 'r -�-2$ Right of Way - Vehicle g 7 +].%. Right of Way - pedestrian Following Too Closely � � No or Improper Signal 1. — Improper Start from Parked Position � Improper Backing 2 .� Improper Lane Usnge 3 � Zg -F-S� , Failure to Drive - Right 1, 2 ••5Q Defeotive Equipment � 55 g .�" Other Hazardous Violation 2 ]„'r � ..2'j Other Violations Total 5 6 zb2 216 -F-�. Parking Violation Total j�, 7 1Eil�, �C� +27 � . ' � MOTOR VEHICLFS ' Mileaga C� 35 11�62 181.z ' Uni-t# 37 6262 8 . 45.7 ' Unit# 38 4647 675.1 Unit� 39 -592 102.5 ! �� 40 4755 636.0 U�i.t�# ' IInit# _ , ' MPG 8.0 7.4 6.9 5.g 7.5 This Nlonth Thia Yoar ' Eq uipeaant & ' idarnit�g T�ga 103 u.� � ' ' ' � . � ' � ' . ,: December 19 6� F:xponae �3.1+9 255.21+ 20'%.O2 45.23 157.52 CP�I .030 .O1�.7.. .Ol,li.= .076 •033 � � ., M � '