02/03/1969 - 5530'
'
�
,
,
1
'
�
'
'
'
�
�
'
�
�
'
C�
'
COUNCIL SECRETARY-J[JEL MER�R
COUNCIL MCETING AGENDA
7:30 P.M.- February 3, 1969
'
'
'
'
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGEND,9 - FEBRllARY 3, 1969 -]:30 P. M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE;
INVOCATION:
ROLL CALL:
' PRESENTATION OF AWARD: Achievement Award - ilans P. Meyerhoff
IAPPROVAL OF MINUTES:
' Regular Council Meeting - January 20. 1969
' ADOPTIO� OF AGENDA:
VISITORS:
' �Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
' PUSLIC HEARINGS:
' None
OLD BUSINESS:
' 1. Second Reading of Ordinance Regulating the Erection, Construction,
Repair, Alteration, Location, or Maintenance of Signs and Billboards
' Within the City of Fridley, Providing for the Posting of Bonds, the
Issuance of Permits, Inspection and Fees, Providing Penalties for
Violations, and Repeal of Exis[ing Chapter 56 (Signs & Bi116oards)
of tfie City Code.
1
,
'
'
'
'
2. Second Reading of Rezoning Ordinance (ZOA 4�68-12} Bob Schroer -
Bob's Produce Ranch a[ 7620 University Avenue N.E. from M-2 to
C-25.
3. Considerati,on of Remaining Appointments to Commissions, Boards,
Committees and Subcommittees for 1969 to Complete Resolution
No. 3-1969 (Tabled 1/20/69)
s
Pages 1 - 23
Pages 24 - 45
Pagg 46
Pag¢ 47
'
REGUTAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - FEBRUARY 3, 1969
,
, OLD BUSINESS (Continued}
4. Discussion Regarding Status of Possible Easement on 39[h Avenue
Northeast (Tabled 1/20/69)
'
' NEW $USINESS:
5. Discuaeion Relative to the New Minneapolis Contract Proposal
For NSSSD.
6. Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Splitting of Special
Assesaments on ParceZ 4720, Part of Outlot 1, Melody Manor 4th
Addition
7. Reaolution Authorizing and Directing the Splitting of Special
Assessments on Parcel 580, Lot 13, Block 3, Oak Grove Addition
8. Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Splitting of Special-
Asseasments on Parcel 1190, Lots 45-48, Block 6, Spring Brook
Park Addition
, 9. Consideration oi Trailer Permit Request - Northern Pacificti;Railway
tCompany.
' 10. Receiving the Minutes of the Sutlding Standards - Design Control
Subco�ittee Meeting of January 22, 1969.
'
' 11. Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of
January 30, 1969.
'
'
PAGE 2
Pages 48 - 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
'
REGUI.AR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - FE$RUARY 3, 1969
'
' NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
12. Receiving the Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Meeting of
' Sanuary 27, 1969.
, 13. Consideration of Meeting to Discuss Industrial'Wastes into
Rice Creek.
,
' 14. Consideration of Change Order G-5 (Noyes Construction) Civic
Center.
'
' 15. Receiving Bids and Awarding Contract - Rear Mounted Truck
Crane (Opened 12;00 Noon, ,Tanuary 27, 1969)
'
, 16. Licenses
' 17. Estimates
'
' 18. Claims
' COMMUNICATIONS:
A. City of Minneapolis; North Suburban Sewer Proposals.
'
,
'' ADJOURN:
'
PAGE 3
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64 & 65
Page 66
Pages 67 & 68
Page G9
Page 70
'
'
'
�
'
'
,
'
'
�f:
'
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANCTARY 20, 1969
Mayor Kirkham called the Regulaz Council Meeting of January 20,
1969 to order at 7:40 P,M.
PLEDGS OF ALLSGIANCB•
Mayor Kirkham requested the audience to stand and join the Council
in ssying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL•
MF.l�BRS pR85ENT: Kirkham, Liebl, Samuelson, Sheridan (Arrived
at 7:45 p,M,) and Hariis
MEN�ffitS ABSENT: None
�RESLQT95�,TIODT OF AWARDS: Certificates oi Appraciation
Mayor Kirkham presented Certificates of Rppreciation to Mr. Wilbur
Whitmore and Mr. David W. Larson for their service on the Police
Co�aisaion and axtended a Thank You from the Council.
Mayor Kirkham then preaented a Certificate of Appraciation to Mr.
John Dunphy for his service on the parks and Recreation Couamission,
also extending the Council's Thank You.
' Mr. 81don Schmed�ke, Plats and Subdivisions - Streats and Utilities
and 1�Ir, Richard Dittes, Buildinq Standards - Design Control were
not present, so their awards are to be sent to them.
'
'
'
'
1
'
'
Mr. Wilbur Whitmore said that he would like to leave an auto- -
matic rifle to the Police Department for display execnplifying law
enforcement.
PROCLAMATION BY MAYOx: proclaiming January 19 - 25, 1969 to be
Jaycee Week.
Mayor Kirkham read the Proclamation, proclaiming the week of
January 19 - 25, 1969 to be "Jaycee Week". He said the Jaycees
were founded in i915.
APPROVAL OF MiNUTES OF TH& REGiJLAk COUNCIL MBETING OF JANUARY 6 1969-
MOTION by Courici2man Harris to adopt tha Minutes of the Meeting
of January 6, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a
voice vote, alI voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared ths motion
carried.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
PAGE 2
ABPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETII3G OF
JANUARY 13, 1969•
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt the Minutes of the
Special Public Heari.ng Meeting of January 13, 1969 as presented
Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Kirkham declarad tha motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Mayor Kirkham said that inasmuch as he has baen ill, he would like
to ask that I�em #3 (Consideration of Remaining Appointments to
Commissions, Boazds, Committees and Subcommittees for 1969�to
Complete Resolution #3-1969) be laid ove�r to the,Meeting.qf
February 3, 1969.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt the Agenda as amended.
Seconded by Councilman Harris. IIpon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Kirkham said that traditionally it has baen the policy of
the Council to qive the Visitors the floor at the end of the
Meeting, and would like to suggest that 15 minutes be set aside
at the beginning of the Meeting for Visitors to speak on any
item not on the Agenda. In this way they would not have to sit
through the whole Meeting to say what they have to say.,
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt the policy of allowing
15 minutas at the beginning of any Regular Council Meeting for
Visitors to speak on any item not on the Agenda. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Kirkham than asked if there was anyone present that wished
to speak on any item not on the Agenda. There was no response.
C�iSIDERATION OF DECISION TO APPROVE PLACEMENT OF GARBAGB CANS IN
DRIVEWAYS DURING SNOW EMERGENCY PERIOD:
Z'he City Manager said the he had received about 60 calls today
concerning the notice sent out by Fridley Sanitation and,Gallaghers
Service Inc., and these people were not in favor of this at all.
He cited the many problems this would entail, such as being kicked
over by childran, being bothered by dogs, hit by snawplows, and
the fact that many of the people are old or sick and this would
be very hard for them. He said tha� he had conversed with
Spring Lake Park, Blaine and Coon Rapids and he felt that a pos-
sible compromise would be to place the garbage cans near the
' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
PAGB 3
1
drivaway or beaide the house. He said that this would not be
' in violation of the City ordinance, except for screening, but
could be used as a temporary solution.
,
,
'
A Visitor to the Meeting said that he would like to speak against
Fridley Sanitation. He said that he pays in advance, and that this
is actually a matter between the Citizan and the contractor. He
said that he cannot agree that people should be expected to cazry
their garbage to the curb. He keeps his walk shoveled to the
garbage cans, and he axpects the garbage haulers to go back there
and pick up his garbage according to their contract.
' Mayor Kirkham said that he agreed that the cans could
beside the driveway or beside the house, but that this
been intended to be a permanent arrangene nt.
be placed
has naver
Mr. James Thayer said that he did not receive a notice, but won-
dered if the contractors assumed that they had the Council's
permission. Mayor Xirkham said that it was made clear to them
that this was a temporary measure, but their notices did not
state this to the public.
Mr. Ben Shutrop of Fridley Sanitation said tfiat they will have to
make some changes in prices as qoing around to the back of evary
houae just takes too long. Mayor Kirkham asked him if this
concession on the part of the City Council would not alleviate
their plight. Mr. Shutrop said that placing the cans on the
curbs on pick up days has worked out nlcely in other cities.
The City Manager said that judging from the calls he has received
it will not work out well in this city.
Mr. Gallagher said that this creates great prob2ems. He pointed
out that the people at the Meeting tonight are probably the ones
that do shovel out and are we21, and not too old, but it is
thase very people that cannot shovel out that could also not
afford a raise in rates. He said that some people simply do not
shovel out to the garbage cans. Councilman Sheridan said that he
believed that what disgusts the people is that the notice said
nothing of beinq a temporary measure due to enav emergencias. Mr.
Gallagher said that Coon Rapids is happy with curb service,
Mayor Kirkham mentioned the fact that a resident's money should
be refunded if he keeps his walk shoveled out to his garbage cans,
but Gallaqher's rafuse to pick it up.
Mr. Gallagher said that they just cannot
' his men work Saturday,.Sunday and Holidays
work all the time, so he feels that he must
'
make the route, and that
and people just will not
raise the rates.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969 PAGE 4
Councilman Liebl said that it comes down to whether the City
should enter into some kind o£ a Municipa2 system or not. If
the present arrangement does not work out, an alternate must be
found. Ha said that it is naw the Citizen's and the contractor's
problem, but the City has already waived the Ordinance as much as
they feel they can. He said that the Council has an obligation
to the people to see that the garbage is picked up, and that letting
bids or a franchise system has been discussed before.
Mayor Kirkham asked Mr, Gallagher if placing the cans neaz the
driveway or house would not be a suitable compromise. Mr. Galla-
gher then said that people accuse his men of going into the
garage and breaking things etc., and that the rates will have to
be raised to p�haps $3.00 a month if paid by the quarter.
'
,
�
�
�
,
1
Councilman Liebl said he had received calls asking if the City '
could.not run a garbage business effectively for from $25 -$36
per year.
Mayor Kirkham said he wanted it fully understood that this is a
temporary measure and allaainq garbage cans beside the house with-
out adequate screening is not a permanent arrangement.
A Visitor to the Meeting said that he has a 4' walk to his cans
and asked if this is not good enough. Mayor Firkham said that
this was between his contractor and him.
Councilman Samuelson asked about sending out another notice. Mr
Gallagher said this would be done. Councilman Samuelson and
Councilman Iiarri5 were in agreement that the notice should have
read for snow emergency only and not indicate that it was a per-
manent arrangement. Councilman Fiarris said that next time a
notice is sent out, he hoped it would be given more thought.
A Visitor asked about a fr8nchi�e system ior City pick-up. Mayor
Kirkham said tnat this is being considered.
Mr. William Drigans, President oi the Fridley Jaycees, said that
this is one of the questions asked in the questionaire they will
be sending out next month.
A Visitor to the Meeting said he had called Gallagher's Sarvice
Co. and was given to understand by the staff there that this would
be a permanent basis, and that the cans must be on the curb. Mr.
Gallagher said this was not so. Councilman Samuelson asked if
this is the information sent out. Mr. Gallagher replied "No Sir".
MOTION by Councilman Harris for the City of Fridley to waive the
Ordinance dealing with placement of containers and allow, but not
' ggGtTLAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
PAGS 5
require, qarbage cans to be placed near the driveways or beside
the house. This is to be effective until April 1, 1969. Se-
conded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voic e vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carrixi unanimously.
The Council asked the prees to please placa a notice to this
effect in the Fridley Sun.
REAFFTRMIDTG RESOLUTION #2-1969 - A RESOLLTPION TO TFiE VZLT,AGE OF
S VIFi� TO REQUEST HELP FROM THE RAMSEY COUNTY COl�LZSSIONERS
Tp UpGRP,D$ COUNTY ROAD A2 FROM CWNTY'S WEST BOUNDARY LINE TO
"�2 ' n'Gfl1PAY #10 AND COPIES OF COMMUNICATIONS WRITTEDT TO MDUNDS
jIT�1 AND A*iOKA COUNTY COI�@IISSIONffit5:
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to reaffirm Resolution #2-1969.
Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
T'he City Engineer said that copies of this have already been s�nt
to 1�. Aapelin and Mr. Griffith representing the Onan Compaz�y.
DISCIISSION RSGARDILiG NEF1 GUIDELINES FOR BOAItD OF APPEALS' (RE4UEST
$Y CARL PAULSON)
' Mr. Carl Paulson came forward with a Proloque he would like to
preaent to the•Mayor and be inserted into the Minutes. The
Guidelines for the Soard of Appeals areas follows:
' ��
,
'
�
'
r:�
I
�
TFiE PROIAGUE
Guidelines for the Board of Appeals
We are livi.ng in an era, when to retain the status quo, in
government, can spell undue trouble, just ahead. When
people in government take the easy rosd in their dealings
with matters which come before the Board of Appeals this
then is one way to discri,minate, even if done urnrittiagly.
2'he easy way out may not be the wish of atiy Board Member.
'This may come about, and if we may atretch the point, from
false testimony. I have seen this happen. This is point
one;
1.
2.
3.
Don't be gullible
Do not willingly discriminate against anyone, friend or
foe. Stick with the Bible idlaa: "love your enemies".
Retain good public relations, but not at the axpense of
anothers' rights.
4. Keep complete transcripts as required by statute at Ieast
a record that will allow anothar not pzesent to evaluata
REGUI.AR COIAdCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
Carl Paulson's Prologue continued:
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
PAGE 6
your findings. This has not been done up to the time of
my first attention focused upon this nead.
Seek out right criterion, the rule. The test that will
produce the best data from co�rensive study and attantion
to matter at hand - refrain f�om slovenly methods.
Verify testimony given you, remembering that all people
aze not honest, especially if they seek to first serve
self.
Don't ever coma befoze the City Council using "bluater"
if, as an individual, you are defendinq the Board because
this it too transparent and, further, it runa counter to
protocil. The City Council looks for and wants facta
upon which to base their decisiona, anything else is out
of ordez.
Work at your dutiea on the Board as if the final outcome
depended upon you. Don't make promises or suggest solu-
tions until you hear the relevant facts. Peopla you deal
wlth will be confueed less by your earlier silenca.
Demand at all times that matters that would normally coeoe
before you are referred to you and when they are, do not
pass them by in a manner that belittles you and more,
never flaunt the law. It is your obligation to uphold
the law and act upon it.
Don't expect to please everyone. When you do, you end up
pleasing no one.
When in governmental service, always remember that some-
ones ideology other than your own should not bring about,
for you, an unholy confrontation.
Rightous indication should be honored; humanistic infal-
libility is a hoax. Some employers count attitudes as
rating higher than a beginners abilities. Ramember,
qood public relations is near to being sacred.
/S/ Cazl Paulson, Fridley"
llayor Kirkham asked that copies be made of this for diatribution
to the Council.
PROPOSF.D METROPOLITAN SECTION TAX PRO,C�R1�M:
Mr. Dean Lund, of the League of Minnesota Municipalities, Metro-
politan 8action came forward and presented a brief axplanation of
the propoaed Metropolitan Section Tax Proqram, and aumuaty of
goals and legislative recommendations.
At tht end of tha p�resentation, Councilman Liebl aaked if this woud,d
not mean that under this proposal, they would ahare their money
REGULAR COiJNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969 PAGE 7
with communities 2ess well off. Mr. Lund replied this was correct,
and that it would have a levelin�� of'f effect. He said that there
are some suburbs that have a high incpme and some a lower income.
The object is to even it out. Councilman Samuelson commented
that it seemed then we would be subsidize Minneapolis and St.
Paul, and that he could sae not advantage.
The City Attorney said that this takes into consideration the
ability to pay, but doas it take into consideration tha effort
communities take to meet high standards. Mr. Lund repliad no.
Mayor Kirkham said that he would like to discuss this at greater
length, and that he plans on being at the Metropolitan C�ncil
Meeting. He said personally he considers this a smoke screen.
AMSRICAbT FIELD SERVICE CHP,PTER:
Mrs. R.E. Metaalf, 860 West Moore Lake Dri�v`e said that she has
with her a student from Guatemala, S�lvia Hernandez and a student,
Sh'gl�la Fezguson, and they would like to preaent Mayor Kirkham with
tickets to the Fair to be held February 8, 1969 at the Senior
High School. The girls then came forward and presented Mayor
Kirkham with his tickets.
CONSIDERATION OF CHANGES IN FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION PENSION:
Mayor Kirkham said that he had
Association and he could see n
go along with this request.
met with the Firemen's Relief
reason why the Council could not
Councilman Samuelson asked if this was basically for full time men.
, Robert Aldrich, President of the Fridley Volunteer Firemen's
Relief Association said no, it also includes volunteera,
Councilman Liebl asked about the disability not in performance
of duty, both for paid and volunteer men. Mr. Aldrich explained
that this has become quite a common practice in private industry.
under the presant system unless a man goes the full 20 years, he
does not get any pension benefits. After a rtwn has worked for
10 years, he should be able to try to protect his benefits.
Councilman Sheridan said he would assume that if a volunteer fire
tighter should have to move to another community, as things are
nav, he would collect no benefits. Mr. A1@rich said at this time
the State Statutes makes no �>rovisions for this. This is one of
the reasons for drafting this bill. He added that it w311 not
cost the City anything, and that the rridley Volunteer Firemen's
Relie£ Association is self supporting.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARy 20, 1969 PAGE 8
$�S4J,�U_�'I_QN #11-1969 - RESOLUTI013 SUPPORTTN RF(]TiFCT OF T�
FRIDLEY VOLUNTEER FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION FOR STATE
LEGISLATION TO IMPROVE PENSION BENEFITS OF THE PAID AND
VOLUNTEER FIREMEN OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to adopt Resolution #11-1969.
Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Aldrich said that this will come back before the Council when
the attorney completes the bill, before going into the Legislature.
He said he would like to keep this on che local level. He said
the men are anxious to get out of pERP,,
CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE IN CAPITAL OUTLAY BUDGET OF FSRE DEPART-
MENT:
MOTZON by Councilman Harris to approve the change in budget in
the Fire Department. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS ELECTION ANA APPOINT-
MENTS•
The following men were elected orficers of the Volunteer Fire
Department for the year 1969:
Arthur Olson
LeRoy Blomster
Lawrence Peka
Dennis Ottem
Merle Longerbone
Donald Carrigan
Richard Kremer
Assistant
Assistant
Captain
Captain
Captain
Secretary
Trustee -
Chief
Chief
3 year term
Robert Aldrich -Chie£ of �
Fire Prevention Bureau
Edward Ellis - Assistant
Chief o£ the Fire
Prevention Bureau
MOTION by Councilman Harris to concur with the recommendation of
the Chief of the Fira Department in the appointment of officers
for the Department for the year 1969. Seconded by Councilman
Liebl. upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried unanimously.
AISCUSSION REGARDING ANOKA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES
DUES FOR 1969-
Councilman Liebl coRUnented that the coat went up because o£ hiring
a full time executive secretary.
�I
�
'
'
fJ
�li
'
,
, REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969 PAGE 9
�
�
'
MOTION by CounCilman Liebl to pay the 1969 duea.
Councilman Hazris for discussion.
Seconded by
Councilman Harris asked if the dues wera based on asseased
valuation. Mayor Kirkham said yes.
UPON Ti� VOTE, being a voice vote, all voting sye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried unanimously.
�SCUSSION REGARDING IF AND WHFSi 39TH AVBN[JS NORTHEAST FROM EAST
, R�VER ROAD_WAS VACATED AND IF SO, WIiEN, AT WHOSE REQUSST: (ON
AGENDA AT R84UEST OF COUNCII,MIIN LIEBL)
'
'
�
�'
�
�
'
'
'
�
The City Manager said that he had been asked the statua of the
easement at the north end of the N.S.S.5.8. proparty. He said
he asked the City Attorney to check this out. 'I'he City Attorney
said he did not have all the facts yet on whether or not it has
been vacated. He said he did not find any evidence that it had
been vacated.
Councilman Liebl asked if it would, then would it be considered
a street. The City Attorney said yes, unlesa somethinq elsa
coaies to light. The City Manager said N.S.S.S.D. had stated
they could find no records on this at Anoka County. Councilman
Liebl said then it might be that the fence was put acroes public
right of way. The City Attorney said the City Engineer thought
it might be a question of whether there was a dedicated street
or a private easement. Tha City Engineer suggested thia be laid
over to the naxt Regular Meeting.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to table this item to the next
Regular Council Meeting. Seconded by Councilroan Harris. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declazed the motion
carried unanimously. �
�SCUSSION OF 58WER AGREENIENT WITH MOUNDS VIFiV:
The City Manager said that representatives from the Village of
Mounds View came to discuss with tha Finance Director and himself,
the question of hav the residents hooking onto the eanitary sewer
line would pay.
' The Finance Director said that 3 reaidents ara currently hooked
onto this line now. He said that the arsa is a 2 block area on
Stinsoa Boulevard south oi Osborne Road. He said they would pay
, N.S.S.S.D, directly and would pay the same use charges and the
same connection parmit fee as the City of Fridley. He explained
that this ia juat in preliminary stages and will have�to come back
,
,---
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARy 20, 1969
PAGE 10
for Council approval later. The main question is, is the Council
in agreement with this.
Councilman Sheridan said that then we bould be billing the Viliage
of Mounds View directly, and the Village of Mounds View in turn
would bill the residents. Councilman Samuelson said he thought
that the billing sh ould be based on a sliding scals.
The Finance Director said that for the year 1969 it would be $6.88
pa� foot. Counc�.ltpan Samuels.on said he thought a cut-o.£f date for
any particular figure ahould be established. Counc.ilman Sharidan
agreed and co�nented that then in 1970 th.e rate would be re-
negotiated, probably at a higher rate. He said he felt that
Miounds View would like an established figure for 1969 and sug-
gested the figure of $6.88 per foot as the Finance Director
recoaamended .
Mayor Kirkham then suggested that the Council move on to th e
items the audience are interested in,
D�SCUSSIONI OF ADDITIONAL ACTION COUNCIL DESIRES OF ADMIN,�STRATION
PI�IOR TO CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTZON ON STORM SESVER PROJSCT #80
Councilman Harris said that this problem ia still open and more
discussion and reseazch will be necessary before making a deter-
mination. He said that he would suggeat that the City Engineer,
Conaulting Engineer, City Manager and the Council set a date for
discussing this and ironing out some of th e various problems.
Councilman Sheridan said that although he was not at the Public
Hearing Meeting, he did go over the Minutes carefully, and agread
with Councilman Harris that a meeting should be arranged. He
suggested some kind of a ten year storm sewer program similar ta
the ten year street improvement program that has been put into
effect, to include all those portions of the City not now in-
cluded in a storm sewer district. He said that he felt that the
ten year street improvement program was acceptable to the Citizens
after they understood it, and perhaps swaething like this cculd be
worked out for the storm sewer systems still to be installed.
Councilman Samuelson agreed and thought there wwld be lesa con-
fusion on the part of the Citizens if a long ranga storm sewer
proposal was presented. Councilman Harris agreed and felt that
after a staff and Council Member meeting, more concrete answers
could be given to tha people. Councilman Liebl agreed, and com-
mented that there were streets petitioned for that cannot be done
because of the necessary storm sewer, He said that it just is not
possible to put in a street without solving the atorm sewar problems
firat.
r
,
�
,
'
�
,
'
'
C�i
,
,
'
'
,
'
�
�
�
'
1
'
�
,
�
'
CI'
`J
1
i
'
,
r
�
�'
�
�
,
�
REGUI�AR COUNCIL MEETING OF JAt3UARY 20, 1969 PAGE 11
7fhe City Engineer said that he would suggest putting in the
streets that are poasible nor+ and aqreed with Councilman Sheridan's
proposal for a long range plan whereby the districts would be larqe
enough to keep the coats down.
�MOTION by Councilman Harris to ask the Administration to set a
meeting with the Council as soon as possible for consideratioa of
this storm sewer problem, so that it can get back on the Agenda
as soon as possible and still possibly be included in the 1969
improvement project.
iWyor Kirkham sald possibly the storm sewer could be put in, in
the future at 68th Avenua and 7th Street if enough easemeat width
could be acquired. Councilman Liebl said thst this was one of
the thinga that would have to be considered.
!lKr. Thayer said that thia proposal was brouqht before the people
iaY�out 3 years ago and it was turned down. Nothing has been done
ito change the ariginal plan. He said that when the developers
of Christie Addition put in their storm aewers, they realized that
they would have to run north to Rice Creek, and it was not devel-
oped to drain the Riedel property. He asked that the ramifications
be conaidared carefully before any deci.sion is made. Councilman
Samuelson said that they felt that the eost of a new etudy would
be an unnecessary expenditure until the ffleling of the people
was determined. Mr. Z'hayer said that he felt that it would be
hard to prove any benefit to the people. A Visitor to the
Meeting asked why it cannot run south. Mayor Kirkham told him
that this will be looked into at the staff ineeting. Mr. Thayer
brought up the point that a dollar held in abatement in 1954, is
not the same as the dollar in 1969; there is no equalization.
THE MOTION by Cound lman Harris was seconded by Councilman saauel-
soa. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, itayor Kixkham declared
the a►otion carried unanimously.
• y � � y �, • � a; �� .i• �� ��„ia.,y .Ir :/ .'
s.�. i.11� � ',�� ._Y� �.. • � ii'^i.-.' �:.
• � � ;. s,��� i� i� • :. •u a • � � � � �.��
Councilman Samuelaon said that at the Public Hearing Meeting there
w�re 10 people in favor and S againat the water lina going in.
Ha said that this was a cloae vote, but he would recommend that the
water 11ne be put in.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt Reaolutioa #12-1969.
Seconded by Councilman Sheridan,
Councilman Lisbl pointed out to �a peopl,e in the audience that
they would have the option to hook up when they wished. The City
REGUI�R COU�CIL MBETI�G OF JANUARY 20, 1969 PAGB 12
Engineer commented that this would coraplete the utilities in this
atraet. He added that if the atreet is not put in with the water
line, it will cost more for the water improvement. Co�uncilman
8azria added that the cost of the water line would include patching
of.the street etc., but if the street would be, put in later, the
peopla wou2d actually be payinq on the atraet twice.
A Visitor aaked if there was any time limit as to when a person
would have to hook up. Mayor Kirkham said that tha rasidents
could hook up at any time they wished, as a residential hookup
would not disturb the street. Councilman Sheridan added that in
the event that a well became inoperable, however, they would not
isaue any new well permits and the residents would have to hook
up. The City Manager said, as waa pointed out before that a
resident could hook up to the water line, but retain the well for
uae in aprinkling, so long as the well system is aeparated from
tha City syatem.
A Visitor asked how long it would be between the time the street
is torn up to put in the water line and the complation of the atrset.
The C1ty 8ngineer said that a contractor cannot always schedule hia
work exactly, but that the street would be completed by the end
of September. As it is required to let the contract on a com-
petitive bid basis, it will be 2 or 3 months before the contractor
can dig. He also pointed out that we like tp see,the t;enchea
settle.for a month beforq further work ia dope. Se added that the
water line would be about 7' deep. A Visitor said that it was
his underatanding that a street assessment ia spread over 10
yeara with 6;6 interest. He was told that was corract.
THE VOTE upon the motion to adopt Resolution #12-1969, bein9 a
voice vote, all voting sye, Nayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried unaninausly.
:.. • P b�. � ' • 1. . • • • � _i. _� . _Yi• ; � i:n_� � � .. e '
_�.,. ,n • � � � r, . � •• � a•..�..
Y�• � �� _Y�:.i..M ; ! 1-:
1'he City Engineer said that there was the elimination of one street
in this Resolution3 Hwy. #47 8ast Service Road: Rice Creek
Terrace to 300' south. He said that some determinatioa would hav
to be.made on how much of 68th Avenue and 7th Street would be
done. Councilman Harris said that he would rathar see theae
two streets held in abeyance, rather than deleted, until the
Council can eee what develops with Project #80.
7'he City Engineer pointad out that there is a communication from
pannsylvania Oil Company on Page 85 of the AgenBa indicating that
IREGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
�
PAGE 13
they do not want T.H. #65 West Service Road South of Minnesota
' Transfer Railway improved.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #13-1969, with the
' West Service Road of T, H. #65 from Rice Creek to Minnesota
Transfer Railway Track Right of Way North Line deleted from
the project, and that that portion of 68th Avenue and 7th Street
' needing storm sewer be held in abeyanca. Seconded by Councilman
Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried unanimously.
'
,
,
'
'
'
,
'
'
,
�
1
'
�J
A Visitor to the Meeting said that they were in favor of the
water line but not the street improvement on 66th Avenue. Another
Visitor agreed with him. Mr. R.D. Habel, 392 66th Avenue said
that he did speak in favor of the street improvement, and that
he was in favor of the package deal, as was the majority at the
last Meeting. Mayor Kirkham told rhe people in opposition that
this has already been voted upon, and their only recourse would
be a petition against the project, if they so desired. Mr. Habel
said that he understood that the assessment would be higher, if
they did not put in the street this year. The City Engineer said
that that was correct as it would entail new studies for the cost
as every service would have to be jacked under or trenched across
the street every 70' - 80'. They would also have to cross the
main at 67th Avenue to the south. This way of putting in the
line would be much more expensive. He added that keeping 66th
Avenue in adaquate condition also cuts into the maintenance funds.
Mr. H�el said that many years ago, there was talk of putting in the
water main, and at that time the cost would have been about $200.
It seems that the resideats are being penny wise and dollar foolish.
In 5 years time it will cost still more.
Mayor Kirkham told the objectors that the Council would be happy to
consider any petition they would wish to circulate.
Mr. Habel asked if this would include sodding and black dirt.
Mayor Kirlct�am said that that would depend on how the bid was let.
It has been found to be cheaper for the people to put in their
aaa dirt and seed than to include it in the specifications.
RECESS:
Mayor Kirkham called a recess at 9:55 P.M,
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
JANUARY 8. 1969•
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the Minutes of the Planning
Commission M�et�.ng of ,Tanuary 8, 1969. Seconded by Councilman
REGU7�AR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
PAGE 14 ,
Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
daclared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING TFIE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL
MRF.TING OF JANUARY 15, 1969: - �
LJ
,
,
1. CONSIDERATION OE A RE4UEST TO CONSTRUCT BOB'S PRODUCE RANCH '
LOCATED AT 7620 UNIVERSITY AVENtTE N.E.. FRIDLEY, MINN.
(REQUEST BY ROBERT SCHROBIt. FRIDLEY. MINNESOTAi
The City Enqineer shaaed the plans for the garden center. He
said that they are requesting approval o�n oaly t�e garden center
no�w, as their plans are not completed £o�' the produce sectioa
yet. He said that there is also a gaa station showt� in the
corner, but this is not included in the request. He said that he
has made a reqaeat to the St. Paul Waterworks, to eee what caa
be done about croasirn� their easement. He said that there are
5 entrances shc�m on Ehe plan and he feela that thia should be
reduced to three onto the service road. He said that it ia going
to be brick aad wood, with shingles on the roof, and the north
side ia going to be block. Councilman Samuelson said that his
entrance should, if poasible, line up with the service road to
the south. He said that there is a N.S.S.S.D, line running through
these, and they will hook up to this line for sewer service.
� MOTION by Councilman Harris ta approve the buildisw permit subject
to utility and drainage plans to be submitted to the Er►gineer,
and eliminating two driveways, and dedication of the roadway
meeting the service road to the south. '
Mr. Schroer said that the next portion they will start working on
is the produce section.
The City Engineer said that the southwest corner of the hill which
is on the St. Paul Waterworks easement nseds to be cut down for
visibility, or removed. They have agreed to cut it down verbally.
Councilmati Sheridan asked haw many parcels this rezoning request
will be split into. Mr. Schroer said two phases. xe said this
garden center will take about 400'. His second phase (tha pro-
duce portion) will taks about 300' making a total of 700'. This
is the portion that he is required to have all the plans done on
in 6 months time. He said that he would like to get the garden
center under way within 2 weeks, then ha could procead with the
plans for the produce portion.
Councilman Samuelson said that the dedication of the roadway will
ba no problem, and this will be dedicateci by the developer when the
� �i%�ZV�`� ��` �('Qd�P ���li:�'.;, �� �t� %%�f� �C�',e-�• /7, /f 6%
, REGUTAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JAN[JARY 20, 1969
,
PAGE 15
City has established the alignment, through negotiations with
St. Paul Watarworks.
MfJTION AMENDED by Councilman Harria that the Certificate of
Occupancy would depend on the dedication of the roadway1Q�rf4,��
� Cou/�man�an th/� for an axecutive recasa at 10:30, �
at which time the Council adjourned to the conference room until
1�:55 P.M.
THE MOTIO�i was seconded by Councilman Sheridan. IIpon a voice vote,
Kirkham, Sheric7ati, Lieb1, Harris voting aye, Sac�elson abstaining,
Mayoz Kirkham declared the motion carried.
It was ag�eed that the Ordinanca for rez�inq is to be brouqht
back for �econd readinq at the February 3, 1969 Meeting.
2.
T�E SOiTl'H 15Q FSET FRONT AND REAR OF LOT 9. AUDITOR'S
, The City $ngineer said that this was for a 10 unit apaztment
building. The Council had the first reading of the Ordinance
August 19, 1968, with the second reading to be withheld until
1 all the plans are ready. Councilman Liebl pointed out that the
Building Standards - Design Control recommended approval subject
to drainage and gradinq plans being approved by the City Engineer.
1 The City Er►gi.neer said that in the front, the drainage is toward
the front and in the back, the drainage ia to the back. He said
that he w111 work wlth the applicant on this. Ae said that the
1 parking 2ot is along the side. As the City has requested a 30'
road dedicatiaai on the west of the property, he has acquired
additional property, but th is will have to go to the Planning
, Co�wniasion for rezoning befora the Council caa act on it. The
action before the Council at this time la only for the original
request area. The City Attoraey asked if any of the building is
, located on the second section. The City Enginear said no, only
the original porti,on.
���� S� READIDTG OF ORDINANCE #409 - ADT ORDINANCE TO AI��ID THE
, �� CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY� MINN&SOTA BY 1�KING A CHANGE
� IDT ZO�iING DISTRICTS:
' � MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Ordinance #409 on aecond
�� reading, waive the reading and order pvblication. Seconded by
' Councilman Hazris. Upon a roll call vote, Kirkham, Lisbl, Harris,
Samuelson and Sheridan voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried unanimously.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
PAGE 16
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to grant the building permit
subject to the stipulations set forth by the Buildinq Boazd,
with the Certificate oi Occupancy to be withheld until the
rezoning of the second portion recently acquired goes throuqh.
Seconcied-by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanittwusly.
E •.� � ni;. • • � • • • � r _�
...1: : �Y .� _. J • � .�I ; �!� .�� . = �tl� �ti
N. E. . FRIALEY . MIN�'1ESOTA ( REQUEST BY t�t. RALPH TFIOlR�S .
6240 JUpITER ROAD. FRIDLEY, MINDTESOTA)
Z'he City Engineer sai� that this would be just north of Minnie
Pearl. He said that he has worked with the applicant in zegard
to the parking raquirements and that there are 39 parking places
provided. He said that it would be basically like the one on
T.H. #65, and will seat 128 people.
Mr. Thomas said that the plan is basically the same as that used
throughout the country. He said that he has agreed to the
landscaping and the sidewalks.
Tha City Engineer said that he meets the sign requirements, and
that he has 200' frontage. Councilman Sheridan asked if the
parking stalls aze adequate. The City Engineer said that they
exceed the requirements. Ae said that he felt that he had a
nice set of plans and that he will work with him on the drainaga.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to approve the building permit for
a Mr. Steak restaurant requested by N�. Thomas. Saconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
4. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO MdVE A BUILDING FROM 6490
LRJIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. TO 6101 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.,
FRIDLEY MINN. THE SAME BEING GARY'S SHELL SERVICE.
/RRni7F_RT RY MSNNEAPOLIS STAR AND TRIBiINE. 4915 CEN7'RAL
The City Engineer said that the Building Standarda - Dasign Coatrol
had recommended approval of this request, however, this is the
azea the City is trying to get the loopback. This ahed would
take up aoma of tha proposed parking apaca. Councllman Liabl
asked if this was approved, would the Council be bound to theis
deCision. The City Enginesr said that it is a movable shed.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to deny the request to move the
shed to Gary's Shell Service Station. Seconded by Councilman
REGUTAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
Liabl.
PAGS 17
Councilman Sheridan suggeated locating the shed on City owned
property south of 61st Avenue close to Club 47. In this way
they would rent from the City, and if so desirad at a later date
to have it moved, the City would have the riqht to direct the
owner to do so.
T88 VOTB upon the �tion being a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
5. CgN3?9SRATTQ�i OF A RE UBST TO COHSTRU(.T ADi ANIMAL HOSPITAL
!1V TN�1 �J DTMV 1 VLRf�JTT �b �]1T}\ Tnf1TTTNT �N��I� ww���na�
The City Engineer said that they have already abtained a Specisl
Use Parmit. Building Standards - Design Control approvad tha
requeat subject to the submission of a revised plot plan.
Councilman Sheridan askad if there was adequate parkinq. The
City Enqineer said that there were 19 parkinq placas which should
be plenty, and added that all boazdi� of animals would be done
inside.
MOTION by Councila�an Harris to approve the builditng permit sub-
( ject to the stipulations set forth by the Building Standards -
Design Control Subcwamittee. Seconded by Councilman Liebl.
' Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried unanimously.
,
�
'
,
RECEIVING THE MINUTSS OF TFIE HUMAN RELATIODTS COMMITTEE MEL�fIDiG QF
NOVS�SR 21, 1968•
lROTION by Councilman Hazris to receive the ![itiutas of the Human
Relations Cwmnittee Meeti� of November 21, 1968. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
(Bids Opeaed at 11:00 A.1K. January 20, 1
, The City Manager said that Coon Rapids Chrysler Plymouth, 3107
Coon Rapida Boulevard, Coon Rapids, Minnesota, bid a total price
of $7,219.00 with delivery indicatad for 40 - 60 days. Tha
' bid waa on a 1969 Plymouth Model PK 41. 7'he other bid was from
Fairview Chrysler - Plymouth, Inc., 1800 University Av�nue, St.
Paul, Minn. with a total bid price of $7,299.00 with delivery
'
REGUI.AR COiJDTCIL r1S�lIDTG OF JANUARY 20, �967
PAGE 18 '
indicated 40 - 60 days. The bid was on a 1969 Plymouth. He said
-- that there was budgeted $6,900, but that they are trading in two
Police Cars later on and this may balance off the budget.
lfOTION by Councilman Harria to award tha purchase of three
Police Cars to Coon Rapids Chrysler-plymouth Inc., 3107 Coon
Rapida Boulevard, Coon Rapida, Minnesota in the amount of $7,219.00.
Seconded by Councilraan Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye,
Nayot Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
�'.SOLUTIODi #14-1969 - RESOLUTION ORDERING L�3ROVEM��►�T ANb FINAL
P]�ANS AND SPHCIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATSS OF COSTS THERBpF; STORM
SE9�ER PROJSCT #89 • , ,
MOTIOri.by Councilman Liebl to adopt Resolutlon #14-1969. Se-
conded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voics vote, all votinq
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimoualy.
: � _ • i� • � � _ ' • ' ;_: � � • . . . . . � � . . . - 4I�_�! Y�. . �. t.
s • � �• �• �
MOTION by Councilman Hazris to adopt Reaolution #15-1969. Se-
conded by Councilman Samuelson�. Upon a voice vata, all voting
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
CO�iSIDSRATION OF VACATIODT OF A PORTIOTT OF MARSHALL STREBT:
Councilman Harris said that he had met with Mr. Mel Christensea
and indicated to them that the City of Fridley will take no
further acti,nn until N.S.S.S.D, and Harris Fxection co�leta
their neqotiations.
1MQTION by Councilman Harris to table this item and to be brouqht
back when the problem between Harris Erection and N.S.S.S.D. is
finallzed. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried
unanimonsly.
8400 PART OF SECTION 3 A PORTION OF IISICH IS REPLATT� ZNTO
PEARSON'S 58COiiD ADDITION:
NATION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Reaolution #16-1969. Se-
conded by Councilman sheridan. Up�on a voics vote, all votirg
aya, Mayor Kirkham declaxed the motion carried unanimously.
,
'
,
�
. '
'
,
,
,
'
,
'
'
'
�
,
'
,
1
'
1
'
'
'
'
1
�.
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
1
,
,
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969 PAGE 19
" RECEIVING PETITION #T`2-1969 - FOR IMPROVEMER7T OF WEST SERVICE ROAD
OF T.H. #�47 NORTH OF OSBORNE ROAD:
MpTiON by Councilman Liebl to receive Petition #2-1969. Seconded
by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
LICENSES• .
GAS -
Bruce Ylumbing Co.
4741 ltrin Lake Ave . North
Minneapolia, Minneaota
Saseco� Inc.
475 8th Ave,
11ew Brighton, Minneaota
C�SNERAL CONTRACTOB
Lvad-Martin Co.
3023 Randolph St. N. E.
Minaeapolis, Minneasota
HAATING
Ssssco, Inc.
475 St6 Ave A, W.
l�ew Brighton, Minnesota
CIGARETTE
Metro 500
5333 University Ave.
Fridley, Minn
CAFE
Colonial House
6215 University Ave,
Fridley, Minn.
CANDY VENDING MACH•
Metro 500
5333 Univeraity Ave.
•Fridley, Minn.
�
By: Delbert Bruae
Bq: Sobert Jenson
Bq: Clifford Lund
Sy: Bobert Jeneon
0
NSW
FSX
NSW
By: Paul Castonguay NEW
By: Paul Bany NES+T
By: Paul Castonquay NEW
APP&OVBD BY
Plbg. Insp.
Stg. Inep,
Dldg. Inap.
Htg. Insp.
Po11ce Chief
Health Insp.
Health Insp.
e
a
,
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
9N/OFF SALE
Club 47
6061 University Ave.
Fridley, Minn.
By: Billy D. Hazpole NEW
PAGE 20
Police Chief
Health Insp.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the foreqoinq licenses.
Secondad by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
CLAIMS•
MOTIODT by Councilman Sheridan to approve payment of General
Claims #17079 through #17220 and Liquor Claims ##2902 through
#2972. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
$STIMATES-
Dunkley Surfacing Company
3756 Grand Street N.E.
Minneapolis, Minn.
Estimate - Straet Improvement Project St. Z968-1B
& MSAS Street Improveaeent Project Project St. 1968-2B
1968-1B
1968-2B
Karl Dedolph Construction Co.
771 W. 7th street
St. Paul, Minn. 55102
$38,244.13
18,645.66
8stimate #3 for work corapleted this date for
General and Electrical Work - Remodeling in
Civic Center accordinq to contract
Park Department
Bldgs. Fund 409.51
Comstock and Davis, Inc.
Consulting Enqineers
1446 County Road J
Minneapolis, Minn. 55432
$ 515.47
1,880.00
Estimate #1 (FINAL) for work and services pro-
vided for Sewer Extension - Lambert's Addition
from October 14, 1968 through December 14, 1968
$56,889.79
$ 2,395.47
$ 856.84
� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969
�
MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve payment of the
' Secondad by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
�
,
�
PAGE 21
estimates.
voting aye,
Councilman Liebl asked if the estimate for Dunkley Surfaci� waa
a final astimate. Z'he City Engineer said no.
COI�SUNICATZODTS •
p Zt�T�EPEDIDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #14• RESOLUTION RE4UESTING
SIDEFIAI+KS AND CROSSING SIGZiAL
MpTION by Councilman Harris to receiva the coMnuniaation fraa
' School District #14 dated January 16, 1969. Seconded.by Council-
man Liebl.
Councilman Liebl sald that he would like to have the Administration
find out the costs of putting in a sidewalk or� the east aide of
East River Road. The City Enqi.neer said that there wae not
enough right of way oa East River Road for sidewalks and it
would make it axtremely dangerous for children to walk along
this street. He showed an alternate proposal that he said that
he would like to propose to the School District #14 showing the
walk way down Riverviaw Tex'race. Cwncilman suggested conde�aning
some land on 61st Avenue 100' further south, then siqnalize the
intersection. 'I'he City Engineer said that the signals will have
to be complete aemephores, rather than flashing aignals. T'he
City Enqineer pointed out that along Riverviaw Terrace the City
already has most of the necessary riqht of way, the south portion
would be just a walk�way. The City &ngineer said that this will
have to be discussed with the School Board, and that he did not
thinYc that enough right of way could be obtained without condemning
some homes on East River Road.
1++�. Richard Harris asked if there would be sidewalks put in in
the south portion of Riverview Terrace. The City Snqinear said
no, that easemeats would have to be obtained, then it would be
juat a walk�way. He said that he felt that this is the uast
reasonable and safest way. The Council was irr agreement with
the City Engineer's proposal.
THE VOTE upon the motion to receive the letter waa a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unani-
mously .
8_ IiOPE9i00D HILIS INC • REGF�RDIDTG REZONING REQUEST
MOTIO�T by Councilman Harris to receive the communication from
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARy 20, 1969
PAGE 22 '
Hopewood Hills, Inc. dated January 13, 1969. Seconded by Council-
man Samuelson. Upon a voica vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion caTried unanimously.
C GR,EAT NORTHSRN RAILWAY• UTILITISS IMPROVBMENT SN TitF►f`TS
SOVPH OF I, 694
1�TION by Councilman Liebl to receive the communlcatton from
Great Northern Railway Company dated January 9, 1969. Seconded
by Councilman Sheridan, upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkhara declared the motion carried uhanimously.
D CIVIL DSFBNSE• CERTIFIGATION OF DIRSCTOR
MOTION by Councilman Harris to raceive the communication from
the State of Minnesota, Department of Civil Defense dated Janu-
,ary 3, 1969. Seconded by Councilraan Samuelsoa. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried
unamiously.
E�_ I�E WALTER: OPPOSITION TO 3TORM SEWER PROJEC71' #SO
MOTIODI by Councilman Liebl to receive the co�rmunication from
i,ee Walter, 6361 Quincy Street N.E. dated January 14, 1969.
Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
F PEZIDTSYLVANIA OIL• OPPOSING IMPROVEMENP OF T H #65 WEST
SERVICE ROAD
MOTI�1 by Councilman Sheridan to receive the communication from
Pennsylvania 011 Company dated January 15, 1969. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion cazried unani�usly.
•l 1. �!. S.' • , • v��t ;= � H� �� •
'2 �' •
l�iOTZO�T by Councilman Hazris to receive the comnunication fraa
the Fridley Human Relationa Conanittee dated January 17, 1969 and
authorize preparation of a Certificate of Achiev@ment. Seconded
by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham daclared the motion carried unanimously.
t •si��� :• •• •; . �• �• • ,.
�
7.'he City Attorney said that he would like srnae dlrection from
the Council on whether they wisl� him to try further negotiationa
� REGUI.AR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1969 PAGE 23
'
or cott¢nence with the necessary legal action. Councilman Sheridan
' said that he felt that they ought to let him get started with the
legal proceedings.
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
,
'
'
�
�
'
�
�
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to follaw the recommendation of the
City Attorney and start lagal proceedings against Spri� Lake
Park to force them to recognize their obligations, and to
receive the memorandum from the City Attorney dated January 20,
1969. Seconded by Co�cilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
CITY ENGI�iEER•
Councilman Sheridan said that he felt that the City Enqinser
should be awarded for the outstanding contributions he has made
in the many facets of the industrial developuaent of the City;
also for his work with the Planning Commission and Chamber of
Comm�erce. He pointed out that many people cwne to his office
to get assistance and he would like to suggest that the Adrainis-
tration prepare an appropriate award for Nasim Qureshi showing the
Council's appreciation for all the work he has done, especially
in the last few years of rapid industrial grawth.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to concur with Councilman Sheridan's
suggestion. The motion was secondad and upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURrA�lB�TP •
There being no further business, Mayor Kix'kham declared the Regular
Council Meeting of January 20, 1969 adjourned at 11:40 P,M.
R pectfully submitted,
� �� ��
el Marcer
Secretary to the City Council
Jack O. Kirkham
Mayor
PROPOSID SIGN ORDINANCE AS CORRECTID ON THE
DECII�FR 12 , 1968 MEEPING
SIGN ORDINANCE
Section
1. Purpose and Intent
2. Definitions
3. General Proviaions Applicable to All Districte
4. Special Regulations: Temporary Nonacceasory Free-Standing�
signa
5. Dietrict Re�ulatione
s. R-1, R-2 and R-2A
b. R-3, R-39 and R-4
c. C-1, C-2, C-1S and C-2S
d. Automobile Service Sign Permit Area
e. CR-1 and CR-2
f. M-1 and M-2
g�. P and PD
6. qdministration
�. Ehtforcement
8. Non-conforming Signe
9. 9everance Clause
10. Repeal
ADDITIONAL REFERENCE MATERIAL
PaAes
1
�-4
4-8
9
9
10
10-11
11-12
i2-t3
�3-14
�4
�4
�4-17
17-20
20-21
21
21
��L�-
ti _"
25
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION,
REPAIR, ALTIIiATION, LOCATION, OR MAINTF�iANCE OF SIGNS
BND BZLLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLE'Y, PROVIDING
FOR THE POSTING OF BONDS, THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS,
INSPECTION AND FF�'S'S, PROVIDING PENALTZFS FOR VIOLATIONS,
AND REPEAL OF EXISTING CHAPPER 56 (SIGNS & BILLBOARDS�
OF TI3E CITY CODE.
SECTION 1. Purpoae and Intent
The purpose o£ this Ordinance ia to protect e.nd promote the general
welfare, health, safety and order within the City of Fridley through the
eatabliehment of a comprehensive and impe.rtial series of standarda, regulations
and proaedures governing the erection, use and�or display of devices, eigna or
eymbole serving as a visual communicative media to persons situated within or
upon public ri�ht-of-ways or properties.
The provisione of this Ordinance are intended to encourage creativity,
a reaeonable degree of freedom of choice, an opportunity for effective
communioation, and a senae of concern for the visual amenities on the part of
thoae deeig�ning, dieplaying or otherwise utilizing needed communicative media
of the typea regulated by this Ordinance; while at the aame time, asauring that
the public is not endangered, annoyed or diatracted by the unsa£e, disorderly,
indiecriminate or unneceseary uae of such communicative facilitiea.
SDCTION 2. Definitione
A. "Accessory Sign" means a aign relating in ite subject matter to the
premiaes on which it is located, or to products, accommodationa,
servicea or activitiea on the premisea on which it is located.
B. "Acceaeory Uee" means a uae which is aubordinate to the principle
use being ma.de of a parcel of land. Ezamples: identiPication aigns,
off etreet parking�, of£ street loading, telephone boothe, etc.
-1-
�,
�..
C. "Addresa Sign" means poetal identification numbers only, whether
written or in numeric form.
D. "Area Identification Sign" meane a free-etanding eign which
identifiea the name of a neighborhood, a reaidential subdiviaion, a
multiple residential complex conaisting o£ th,ree (3� or more
atructures, a shopping center consieting of tjiree (3� or more
separate business concerna, an industrial are�, an office complex
consiati.ng of three (3� or more structures or any combixiation of
the above.
E. "Baxinere and Pennants" mean attention getting� devicee which resemble
flags and are o£ a non-permanent paper, cloth or plastic-like
coneistency.
F. "Bench Sign" meana a aign which is affixed to a bench at a bua atop.
G. "Church Directional Sign" meane a aign which beara the address and�or
name of a church and directional arrowa pointing to a church location.
H. "Canopy and Marquee" meana a raoflike etructure projecting over the
entrance to a theater, store, etc.
I. "Dietrict" refers to a specific zoning distric� as defined in the
Zoning Ordizlance.
J. "Free-Standing Sign" means a sign which ie plaqed in the ground and
not affixed to any part of any etructure.
K. "Governmental Sign" meana a sign which ie erec�ed by a governmental
unit for the purpose of directi.ng or guiding braffic.
L. "Illuminated Sign" maans any sign which ie illuminated by an
artificial light source.
M. "Institutional Sign" meane any eign or bulletin board which identi£ies
the name and other characteristice of a publia or private
inatitution on the site where the eign is located.
-2-
Fj (
rd
i
�' -
N. "Motion Sign" meane any aign which revolvea, ;otates or has�any
moving parts.
0. "Nameplate or ldentificatio.n Sig�n" means a sign which bears the
name and�or addreas of the occupents of the puilding.
P. "Non-Acceasory Sign" means a sign other than an accesaory eign.
Q. "Nonco.nforming Sign" means a sign which lawfu�ly exieted prior to
the adoption of this Ordinance but does .not con£orm to the newly
enacted requirementa of this Ordina.nce.
R. "Portable Sign" meana a sign ao deaig�ned as to be movable from one
location to another which ie not permanently attached to the
gxound or any atructure.
S. "Projecting Sign" means any sign, all or any part of which extends
over public property more than twelve (12� inches.
T. "Permanent Sign" ia any sign which is .not a temporary sign.
II. "Roof Sign" means any sign erected upo.n the roof of a atructure to
which it is af£ised.
V. "Roofline" is defined se the top line of the eoping; or, when the
building has a pitched roof, as the intersection o£ the outside
wall with the roo£.
W. "Sig�n" meana any letter, word or symbol, deviee, poster, picture,
atatuary, reading matter or representation in the nature of an
advertiaement, announcement, meaeage, or viaual communication
whether peinted, posted, printed, a£fixed or constructed, which ie
displayed outdoors for informational or communicative purpoeea.
X. "Sign Area" means that area within the marginal lines o£ the
surface which bears the advertisement, or in the case of inessages,
figurea, or symbols attached directly to any part of a building�, that
area which is included in the amallest rectangle which csn be made
-3-
�
,
i
�
�
�
�
'
I
_�
�
�
,
�
i
'
,
�
r
�
6
ti.
to circumecribe the message, figure or symbol diaplayed thereon.
The atipulated maximum sign area for a free atanding sign refers
to a single £acing.
Y. "Street Frontage" refers to the proximity of a psrcel of land to
one or more streets. An interior lot hae one street frontage and
a corner lot two auch £rontages.
Z. "Temporary Sign" means a eign which ie erected or displayed for a
limited period of time. Such temporary signa shall include those
lieted in Section 3, and Section 5D,(2�b, and pennants, banners,
pa.per and other aimilar type signs.
AA. "Private Traffic Directional Sign" meana a aign which is erected on
private property by the owner of auch property for the purpose of
guiding vehicular and pedeetrian traffic. Such sign bears no
advertiaing information.
BB. "Wall Sign" means any sign which is affixed to a wa11 of any building.
CC. "Window Sign" meana a eign placed on a window, or any aign placed
within a building� £or the purpose of being visible from the
Axblic Right-0f-Way.
SECTION 3. General Proviaions A�plicable To All Dietricts
A. Non-acceeaory free atandin� ai�ns are prohibited i.n all districte
except in areas specifically defined in the Ordinance £or this
purpose. Non-acceasory wall aigns shall be permitted only in the
C-2, and C-2S Commercial Dietricta according to the requirements
eet £orth for those diatricts.
B. All eigns ahall be constructed in auch a manner and of euch ma.terial
that they shall be eafe ana aubatantial, provided that nothipg in
this Ordinance ahall be interpreted as authorizing the erection or
conetruction o£ any aign not now permiseible under the 2oning or
��
2�
Building Ordinance of the City.
C. No sign ahall contain any indecent or offensive picture or written
matter.
D. No illuminated aig�n which changes in either color or intenaity o£
light ahall be permitted except one giving public service
information such as time, date, temperature, weather, or similar
information. The City Building Inapector in granting permits for
illuminated signs shall specify the houre during which the same may
be kept lighted when necessary to prevent the creation o£ a nuieance.
All illuminated signs shall have a shielded light source.
E. No sign other than governmental signa shall be erected or temporarily
placed within any atreet or public right-of-way or upon any public
easement.
F. A permit for a ai n to be located within 50 £eet of any atreet or
h�hwav ret�ulatory or rrarnin� si,Qn, of any traffic si�n or si�nal, or
of any crosaroad or corsswalk, will be iasued only if:
(1� The sign will not interfere with the ability of drivers and
pedestrians to see any atreet or hig�hway eign, or any traffic
sign or sig�nal, or any crosaroad or croaswalk, and;
(2� The aign will not distract drivara nor of£er any confusion to
any street or highway aig�n, or any traffic sign or signal.
G. Roof aigne are prohibited in all diatricta.
H. Bannere, pennants and whirlir� devicea or any suoh sign resemblir� the
eame are prohibited from use wit'zin the City ex„zpt when used as an
integral part o£ Lhe design o£ a bailding or wher. used in conjunction
�ritn grand openings (the initisl commencement of businesa�,or when
all�wed by the provisions of this Ordinance. In the case o£ grand
openings, banners and pennants ahall be allowed for the week (� days�
-5-
1
'
��
'
'
�
1
'
'
'
'
'
�
�_ J
�
�
t
�
�
oF said �rand opening. In other cases,s epecial permit shall be
ieaued for 7 day periods, but limited to three (3) times a year
per busineas.
I. Cam�i�n ei�ne posted by a bona£ide candidate for political of£ice or
by a pereon or group promoting a politioal issue or a political
candidat= mny be plaoad in any district subje�t to t7e requirements
of t:�.t -li.atri�:t. Such signs shall be removed within seven (7� days
followi� E:ie electian. A�25.00 deposit ehall be received by the
City of Fridl�y before any si�na may be post�3. If a,ll tae si�ns are
rzmoved, the $25.00 will be rNfunded, bu� if removal is not
conplete, t:�e depos�t wz11 be used to defray t:ze coeta of removal.
J. One.temporary identification sign may be installed upon a
co.netruction site in any district, provided such sigzi does .not
exceed eighty (80� square feet in area.
I{. TemDOrarv real estate aigns may be erected for the purpoae of selling
or promoting a reaidential project o£ ten (10� or more dwelling
units or any non-reaidential project provided:
(1� Such s-�g�ns shall not exceed one hundred (100� equare feet in
L
area.
(2� Only one such sign ahall be permitted per street frontage upon
which the property abuts.
(3� Such signa shall be removed when the groject ie 95� completed,
aold or leased, and
(4� Such eigna ahall be located no closer than one hundred (100�
feet to any pre-exieting residence.
m_emnorary s;�s for the purpose of aellin� or leaeing individual
lote or buildings shall be permitted, provided:
(1� Such signa shall not exceed aix (6� square £eet for residential
-6-
3�
property and twenty-£our (2¢} aquare feet for non-residentisl
property.
(2� Only one auch eign is permitted per atreet frontage upon
which the property abuts. (Exception: An additional "open
house" sign may be used.�
(3� Such sig�n shall be removed within thirty (30� days £ollowing�
the leaee or sale.
M. Any free-etandinQ si�n within twenty-five (25� feet of any
interaection of street right-of-way lines and/or driveway entrances
ehall have a minimum vertical clearamce o£ ten (10) feet above the
centerline o£ the pavement.
N. The total sign area of any multi-faced free-atanding eign ahall
not exceed twice the permitted area of a sing�le face sign.
0. Private traffic directional signs shall not exceed six (6� equare
feet in area.
P. Motion siRris are prohibited in all diatricta.
Q. Portable aigne are permitted only in the R-1 Diatrict.
R. No projecting ei�n ehall be permitted in any district.
S. One addresa ai�n ahall be required per building in all diatricts.
T. Bench aigns ehall be permitted only at bua staps.
II. Church directional ai�ns ehall be permitted in all districts
provided the total area of euch signa ehall not exceed four (q�
aquare feet per facing.
V. Canopies and marquees shall be conaidered to be an i.ntegral part
of the structure to Which they are acceesory. Signa may be attached
to a canopy or marquee but such etructurea shall not be considered
se part of the wa11 area and thua ehall not warrant additional
eign area.
-7-
3L
i2
W. Signs which are located on the interior of a building, except
window aigns, shall be exempt from the provisione of the
Ordinance and ehall not require permits and feee.
X. Sig�ns attached to a building wall which extend more than
twenty-four (24� inches from euch surface ahall be prohibited.
Y. The ieauance o£ a permit may also be aubject to conditions in order
to promote a more reasonable combination o£ eigne and to promote
con£ormity with the character and usee of adjoining property. The
conditione will be aubject to the discretio.n of the Building
Inepection Department.
Z. A wall eign or other building fencing (which is an integral part
of the structure� may project only four (4� feet above the
roofline of a etructure. Thia additional height, however, shall
not be conaidered ae part of the wall axea and shall not warrant
additional aign area. Signs ahall not be painted directly to any
exterior building surface but shall be on a aeparate frame except
for temporary diaplsy windowe. Si�n lettere and aymbola may be
sttached directly to a wall by adhesive or mechanical meana.
AA. Maintenance
(1� The surface and structure of all eigns must be kept refinished
ae neceesary to prevent the sign aurface £rom becoming
unkempt i.n appearance. Whe.n any aign for which a permit ia
required is removed, the Building I.nspector sha11 be notified
and the entire sign and ita' componenta ahall be removed.
{2� The permit owner snail be responeible for all of the
requirementa of thia Chapter includin� the liabilitv for
expe.nse of removal and maintenance incurred bv the Citv
"-�
,
,
'
�
,
'
,
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
�
�
�I
'
�;
SECTION 4• Special Regulations: Temporary Nonacceaeory Free�tanding Si�na
Nonaccesaory aigna shall be permitted on a temporary baeis on the
following described property subject to all of the requiremente herein aet forth:
The property Weat of University, East of the railroad tracks, and North of
Oeborne Road.
A. Maximum Hei�qht: Twenty (20� fset above lot grade.
B. Maximum Sign Area: Three hundred (300� equare feet per facing and not
to exceed two (2� facinge. Double £aced aigna eha]1 be attached
back to back.
C. Minimum Diatance Between Signs: Five hundred (500� feet.
D. Minimum Setback From Street RiAht-of-Way Lines: FiSty (50��£eet.
E. Diatance From Street Intersectione: Not cloaer than five hundred
(500) feet to the i.ntereection o£ two or more streets or highways,
euch diatance being measured £rom the intersection of etreet or
highway centerlinea.
F. Proximity to IIeea Permitted in Reaidential Districts and New
Conetruction•
Not closer than five hundred (500� £eet to any reaidential etructure,
any publically owned land, or any other uee or strueture permitted
in any dietrict. When any structure is built within five hundred
(500� £eet of a temporary non-accesaory aign, such eign shall be
immediately removed upon occupency o£ such etructure.
SECTION 5� District Regulations
In addition to thoee signs permitted in all dietricts, the following�
signe are permitted in each epecific district and ehall be regulated as to aiae,
location and character according to the requirementa herein set forth:
-9-
,
'
,
t)��-
A. R-1, R-2, R-2A Residential Dietricte
(1� Nameplate SiKna: One aign for each dwelling unit, not greater
than two (2) aquare feet in area, indicating the name and�or
addreas o£ the occupant.
' (2) _Inetitutional and Recreatio.nal Siana: One eign or bulletin
boasd per etreet frontage for a church, a puLlic inetitutional
�
uee, or a recreational uae in the R-3, R-2 and R-2A Dietricte.
Suoh aign or bulleti.n: board ahall not exceed twenty-four {2¢�
, aquare feet in area nor ahall it be placed cloeer than ten (10�
'
�
,
'
'
,
'
'
'
�
feet to any etreet right-of-way line.
(3� Area Identification Si�ns: One eign per develo�ent not to
exceed twenty-£our (24� aquare feet in area.
(Q� Temporary Si�na: Refer to Section j.
(5} Maximum Height of Free-Standiri4 Signa: Six (6� £eet above the
lot grade.
(6� Minimum Setback: No part of a sign ehall be within ten (10� feet
of any property line. (Bucegtion: Nam�plate eign may be placed
anywhere on the owners property.�
B. Multiple Reaidential Districts- R-3, R-3A And R-4
(1� Identification Signe: One identification aign or aymbol per
building not greater than aix (6� aquare feet in area, provided
such sign ie attached flat against s wall of the building.
(2) Area Identi£ication SiKne: One area identification sign per
development, providing euch aign doea not exceed twenty-four
(24� equare feet in area, and flirther provided, euch si�n is
placed no cloeer than ten (10? £eet to any etreet right-of-way.
' (3� I.nstitutional SiQns: One sign per atreet Yrontage identifying�
an inetitutional complex within a multiple reaidential diatrict
'
,
-10-
�
Il
'
'
'
,
1
'
35
(convalescent, nursing, rest or boarding� care homes, or
mobile home comp3ex.� Such sign ahall not exceed twenty-
£our (24) aquare feet in area nor shall it be placed cloaer than
ten (10� feet to any atreet right-of-wsy line.
(4� Accessory Uae Si,qns: Signa identifying uses acceeaory to a
mu2tiple residential development ahall not be visible £rom the
public right-of-way.
(5) Temporary Signa: Refer to Section 3.
(6� Maximum Height oP Free-Standing Signa: Six (6� feet above the
lot grade.
('j� Miminum Setback: No part of a eign ehall be within ten (10�
feet of any property line.
(B� Private Tra££ic Directional Signa: Refer to Sectiun 3,/0�.
' C. Commercial Districts-C-1, C-2, C-1S, C-2S
' (1� Wall Signe: The total area o£ all wall eigns affixed to a
building� wall ahall not exceed fifteen per cent (15%� o£ the
1
'
� I
,
,
1
L
'
�
total area of that wall.
(2) Free-Standing Signs: Qne free-standi.ng aign for each building
per etreet frontage. The total area of a free-standing eign
for a building having one street frontag�e ahall not exceed
eighty (80� aquare £eet in Commercisl Diatrict C-1 and C-1S,
nor ahall it exceed one hundred ('!00) equare Peet in Commercial
Dietrict C-2 and C-25. Where a building� has two or more atreet
frontages, only one £ree-etsnding eig�n o£ the above eize ehall
be permitted. Each permitted free-atanding sign in excese of one
shall be no �reater in area than o.ne-hal£ {�) the area of the
firet eign. The maximum height of free-standing signa shall be
twenty {20� feet in the C-1 and C-1S Dietricts and twenty-five
_��_
m
1
'
t
'
■ _J
'
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
❑
,
'
'
'
(25� £eet in the C-2 and C-2S Diatricta.
(3� Area Identi£ication Signa: One aign per develo�ent .not to
exceed one hundred {100� aquare £eet in area.
(4� Temporary Signa: Refer to Section 3,
(5� Private Tra£fic Directional Signe: Refer to Section 3„i0/�.
(6� Exceptiona: Offices and medical and dental clinica in a
commercisl district shall comply with Section S,E, "Medical
and Office Building District".
(7� Minimum Setback: No part of a sign ahall be within ten (10�
feet of any property line.
D. Automobile Service Area meana gae atatione, drive-in reetaurante,
drive-in theatere, etc.; or any other type of bueineea where an
sutomobile ie used as the recipient of the service or product or
where an automobi2e is neceseary to obtain or to make uae of the
eervice or product.
(1� Wall Signs: The total of all wall eigne affiaed to a
building wall ehall not eaceed £ifteen per cent (15�) of the
total area of that wall.
(2) Free-Standing Signs:
a. One Free-standing sign per principal building per atreet
frontage. The total area of a free-etanding sign for a
building having one atreet frontage ehsll not exceed
eig�hty (80� equare feet. Where a building has two or more
street frontages, only oxie (1� free-standing aig�n of the
above size ahall be permitted. Each permitted free-standing�
eign in esceae o£ one shall have a eign area not to exceed
£ifty (50� equare feet. The maximum height of free-etanding
aigne ahall be tweaty (20� £eet.
_�2_
3��
1
'
'
,
'
b. Temporary product saie, etamp and game signa ma,y occupy
the remainder o£ that area not utilized for the permsxient
free-standing brand sig�n, provided the total area of all
permanent and temporary signs does not exceed eighty (80�
aquare feet for one aign and fifty (50} equare feet for
each aign in excesa of one. Also, the ma,ximum total area
for temporary aigns is twenty (20� square feet.
' (3� Pump Signa: Lettering or aymbols which are an integral part
of the desig�n of a gaeoline pump shall be permitted.
1
'
�
(4� Private Traf£ic Directional 3i�ns: Re£er to Section 3,,(0/.
(5� Temporary Si�ns: Refer to Sectioa 3.
(6� Restroom Signa: Signe indicating the location o£ restrooma
and containing no advertising information ehall be permitted
as needed.
, E. Medical and 0£fice Building District- CR-1 and CR-2
(1� Identification Si�ns: One sign per street frontage, provided
�
such aigna do not exceed thirty-six (36) aquare feet i.n area.
(2� Accesaory Si�na: One �dentification wall sign per acceasory
, use attached to the facing of the building at the ground
�
,
floor level. The total area of all wall signa ahall not exceed
fifteen per cent (15�� of the ground £loor wall facing of the
acceasory use.
(3� Area Identification Signe: One aign per development, not to
' exceed thirty-six (36� aquare £eet in area.
'
C
'
'
(q� Maximum Hei�ht of Free-Standing Signs: Sis (6) feet above lot
grade.
(5� Temporary Signs: Refer to Section 3.
(6� Private Traffic Directional Signs: Refer to Section 3,�/0�.
-13-
3�
��
�
1
�
,
�J
1
,
�7� Minimum Se%back: No part of a aign shall be within ten {10�
feet of any property li.ne. (Exception: Twenty (20) feet
from front lot line when located within twenty (20) feet o£
a driveway},
F. Heavy and Light Industrisl Dietricte- M-1 and M-2
(1� Identification Signa: One identification aign per street
frontage, not to exceed eighty (80� square £eet in area. One
(1� additional wall identification aign £or each te.nant having
a private entry to a multi-tenant building; and the total area
of such aigna being displayed at or near the tenant's
entrance, ahall not exceed ten per.*.ce.nt (10�� of the area
o£ the wall to which it is affixed.
, (2� Area Ide.ntification Si�na: One sign per development .not to
exceed eighty (80� equare feet in area.
' (3� Temporary Signs: Refer to Section 3.
(4� Maximum Heiaht of Free-Standina Si,qna: Twenty (20� feet
, above lot grade.
1 (5� Private Traffic Directional Si�na: Refer to Section 3,f0�.
(6� Minimum Setback: No part�of a aign ahall be within ten (10�
'
feet of any property line.
G. P and PD Districts: Sign requiremenia in P and PD areas would be
, controlled by the Council when the development ia planned.
❑
'
'
'
,
SECTION 6. Adminietration
Permite: Before a aign may be diaplayed in the City of Fridley, the
owner of the premieee on which the sig�n is loceted ehall file application with
the City Building Inapection Department for permiseion to diaplay euch eign.
Permite muet be acquired for all existing, new, relocated, modified or redesigned
_�r_
3�
`�={
e�.
eigns exaept those specifically exempt under Sectio.n 7,%Bf'.
A. Permit Aunlication: Applicatio.n £or permits shall be ma.de upon
blanks provided by the Buildirtg Inepector and ahall atate or have
attached thereto, the following information:
(1� Name, addresa and telephone number of applicant.
(2� Location of building, atructure, or lot to which or upo.n which
the sign is to be attached or erected.
(3� Position of the sign or other advertieing structur�s in
relation to neareat building�s, structures, public atreets,
right-of-waye and property linea. The drawing showing such
positio.n ahall be prepared "to scale".
(4� Two (2� blueprints or ink drawings of the plans and specificationa
and method of construction or attachment to the building or in
!.he ground inci�l3ing all dimeneione. Lcoating all light sources,
wattage, type and color of lights, and details of any light
ahielda or shadea.
(5� Copy of streas aheets and calculations showix� the structure ia
deeig�nated £or dead load and wind velocity in the amount
required by this and all other Ordinancea of the City.
(6� Name of person, £irm, corporation, or aesociation erecting the
etructure.
(�� Any electrical permit required for any aign.
(8� AN AGREEM7%�1'1` WITH Ti� CITY:
a. Which would authorize and direct the City of Fridlev to
remove and dispose of any signs and eign structure on which
a permit has been iaened but which wae not renewed i£ the
owner does not remove the same within a thirtv (30) dav
period followinR the expiration of the permit.
—�5—
1
'
'
'
1
'
'
'
'
'
,
b. Which would authorize and direct the City of Fridley to
remove the ai�n and ai�n atructure, at the expense of the
applicant, where ma.intenance is required and the maintenance
ie not furnished, but only after a hearing and after a
notice of eixty (60) daye apecifying the maintenance
required by the City. �
(9� If a sign suthorized by permit has not been inatalled within
ninty (90� days after the date of ieauance of said permit, the
permit aha,ll become null and void.
(10� The Building Inspection Department may require other
information concerning safety.
B. Fees: Permit feee for signs shall be:
(1� For signe forty (40) square feet or leas an initial £ee of
�10.00.
(2� For signe larger than forty (40� aquare feet the initial fee
ahall be �25.00 plus 25 cente per equare foot of the sign
aurface exceeding 700 square feet.
(3� An annual fee £or free-etandina and non-accesaorY si�na�of
� $5•� vlue 10 cents per square foot of the si€�n aurface
, exceeding 100 aquare feet 9ha11 be charged.
The annual fee ehall not be charged for accessory signe
'
'
'
'
' _
'
attached directly on a building which identify the activity
or advertiae producte sald or eervicee provided in that building.
An annual £ee will be due on Agril 30 0£ each yeer.
(4� No feee are required for the non-permit eigna provided for in
Section 7,�By and may be waived for religious, civic, achool
and public interesta by a majority vote of the City Council.
(5� For bannere, pennante and whirling devicea or any auch ei�n
-16-
4�
�
'
L�
�
'
'
,
'
�
,
�i
resembling the same, a special fee of $5•00 ie required for each
seven (7� day period or lesa.
C. Licenses and Bonds: No peraon, firm, or corporation shall engage in
the buainess o£ erecting signe under thie Ordinance unless 7ice.nsed
to do so by the City Council. Such licenae may be granted by the
City Council after written application to the City Clerk,
accompanied by an annual license fee of $25.00 and it may be
terminated at any time for cause. The licenae shall expire on
December 31et in the year of iesuance and each year thereafter. No
licenHe shall take effect until the licenaeea ehall file with the City
Clerk a corporate eurety bond in the sum of �1,000.00, conditioned
that the liceneeee ahall con£orm to all of the provisions of this
chapter and inde�ify and hold the City, its officers and agente,
harmlesa £rom and damage or claim reeulting from or related to
the erectio.n or maintenance of any aign in the City by the licenaee.
A licenee and bond shall xiot be required o£ an applicant, who ie not
, engaged in the business of erecting aiF3ne, and who choosea to
'
1
'
'
'
'
,
'
construct and erect hie own sign on his �roperty.
SECTION 7. F�forcement
A. Sign Identi£ication Tag: For any aig�n for which a permit ie required
under the provisions of this Ordinance, the City Building Inapection
Depsrtment shall af£iz a tag which ehall be conspicuouely attached
to the sign or on the premisea. Such tag ehall indicate the number
of the aign permit and the date of iseuance. Permits and tage must
be acquired and application feea pe.id £or all non-exempt aigne
exiating at the time of adoptio.n of thie Ordinance.
-�7-
�
'
'
,
,
'
,
'
,
'
'
'
,
'
,
'
,
'
r
B. Esemptione: The exemptions permitted by this Section ahall apply
only to the requirement of a permit and shall not be conetrued as
relieving the installer of the sigrt, or the owner of the property
upon which the sign is located, from con£orming with the other
provisiona of this Ordinance. No permit ie required under thia
Section for the following signs:
(1� A window sign not eaceeding thirty per cent (30%� of the
window area.
(2� Signs having an area of six (6� aquare feet or leas.
(3� Si�ns erected Ly a goverrimental unit or public achool diatrict.
(4) Temporary eigns as liated in Section 3; Paragxapha I, J, K,
and L, and Section 5; Parsgraph D, eubparagraph b.
(5% Memorial signs or tablets containing the name of the building,
its use and date of erection when cut or built into the walle
of the building and conetructed of bronze, braea, atone or
marble.
(6� Signe which are completely within a building and are not
vieible from the outside of eaid buildir�.
C. Violations and Fines: If the City Building Inspector or his agent
ektall find that any sign regulated by this Ordinance is unsafe,
insecure, or is a menace to the public; or has been conatructed or
erected without a permit firet being granted to the owner of the
property upon which said aign hae been erected, or ie improperly
maintained, or is in violstion of any other provisiona of thia
Ordinance, he shall give written notice of euch violation to the
owner or permitee thereof. If the owner faile to remove or alter
the sign so sa to comply with the provieions set forth in this
Ordinance within ten (10� calendar days following receipt of said
_18_
��z
1
'
'
�
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
1
'
'
'
'
'
'
�3
notice, such signs may be removed by the City, the cost incident
thereto being levied ae a special aseeasment against the property
upon which the sign is located.
Any perso.n, organization, corporatio.n or their representatives
found in violation of this Ordinance ahall be guilty of a
misdemeanor. Upon conviction, a fine of not more than i100.00
ahall be impoaed for each day the violation rema.ins in exiatence.
All signa are aubject to auch penalty for violation of the
requirements o£ the district within which they are located even �
though they may not be required by Ordinance to pay a fee or
acquire a permit.
D. 9ppeals:
(1� To provide for a reasonable interpretation o£ the provisiona
of this Ordinance, a permit applicant who wiahea to appeal an
interpretation by the City Building Inspector or hia agent o�y
file a notice of appeals with the City Etigineer and request a
hearing before the Board of Appeals.
The Board shall have the power and duty of hearing and
deciding, aubject to appeals to the City Council, appeals or
requeats in the £ollowing� cases:
a. Appeals where it is alleg�ed that there is an error in any
order, requirement, decision or determination made by the
adminietrative officer in the enforceme.nt of thia Ordinance.
b. Requeate for varie.nces from the literal provisiona o£ this
Ordinance in inatances where their strict enforcement would
cause an undue hardehip.
(2� Before the Board shall grant a variance, it ie the responaibility
o£ the appc, .ant to prove:
-� 9-
�
�
'
�
,
,
1
'
'
�a
�
�
�
That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstancee
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do
not apply generally to other groperty in the same vici.nity
and zoning diatrict;
That the variance ie neceseary for the preaervation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right poaeeseed by
other property in the eame vicinity and zone; but which ie
denied to the property in question;
That the strict application o£ the ordinance would
conetitute unneceeeary hardehip; and
That the granting of the variance would not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurioua to the
property or improvemente in auch vicinity or zone i.n which
the property is located.
'
' SP7CTION 8. Non-conforming Sigae
A. Any non-conforming temporary or portable sign exieting at the time
, of adoption of this Ordinance shall be made to comply xith the
requiremente aet forth herein or ahall be removed within aixty (60�
,
�
'
1
❑
�
'
daye after the adoption of this Ordinance.
B. Non-conformin� permanent acceeeory eigne lawfully existing at the
time of adoption of this Ordinance ehall be sllowed to continue in
use, but ahall not be rebuilt, altered other than to change the
meseage, or relocated without being brought into compliance with the
requirements o£ thie Ordinance. After a non-co.nforming aign hae been
removed, it ahall not be replaced by another non-con£orming sign.
C. Non-conforming non-acceseory signe eziating on the effective date
of thie ardinance ehall become non-conforming uaes and ahall be
-20-
�
.��i
�
'
'
�
'
�
,
�
. _I
,
'_I
�
�5
discontinued within a reasonable period of amortization of the sign;
uaes of signs which become a no.n-conforming use by reason of a
subsequent change in this Ordina.nce ehall aleo be diecontinued within
a reasonable period of amortization o£ the sign. The period of
amortization for signa shall he not more than:
(1� Free-atanding and wall signa: Five (5� years from the ef£ective
date of this Ordinance.
(2) Sig�na painted directly on buildirtg facinga: Three (3� years
from the e£fective date of thia Ordinance.
D. Whenever a no.n-con£orming permanent eign uae has been discontinued
for a period of three (3) months, such uee shall not thereafter be
continued unless in conformance with the provisiona o£ this Ordinance.
SECTION 9. Severance Clause
If any Section, clause or provision or portion thereoY of this Ordinance
ahall be found to be invalid or unconstituiional by any court of competent
juriadictio.n, such decision ehall not a.ffect any other aection, clause, proviaion
or portion thereof of thia Ordina.nce.
, SECTION i0. Repeal
Any portion of the Fridley City Code inconsietent with thia Chapter
iis hereby repealed.
'
'
1
�
�
� �
' ,!i%:��� .._�'./.c'��f.�sc�, �✓j2 , v� ;�7 ���
J
-2�-
,
'
,
�
,
�
,
'
'
,
,
�
'
'
'
�J
ORDINANCE N0.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE
IN ZONING DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is
amended as hereinafter indicated.
SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka
and the City of Fridley and described as:
a) The South 430 feet of all that part of the
South 1/2 of Section 2, that lies between
the West right-of-way line of State Trunk
Highway Number 47, and a line drawn parallel
to and 452 feet West of said West right-of-
way line.
b) A11 that part of the North 1/2 of Section
11 that lies North of Osborne Road and
between the West right-of-way line of
State Trunk Highway Number 47 and a line
parallel to and 452 feet West of said
West right-of-way line.
All lying in T-30, R-24, City of Fridley
County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
Is hereby designated'to be in the Zoned
District known as C-2-S (General Shopping
Area).
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to
change the official zoning map to show said
tract pr area from zoned district M-2 (Heavy
Industrial Area) to C-2-S (General Shopping
Area) .
PASSED BX THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
ATTEST:
DAY OF
196�
�yor - ac 0. Kir am
R - Marvin . Brunsell
Public Hearing: December 9, 1968
First Reading: nP�pmt,er 6� 1q6g
Second Reading:
Publish........
.}�;
1
r
CONSIDERATION OF REMAINING APPOINIMENTS TO COML�fISSIONS, BQARDS, COZQfLTTEES AND
SUBCOMMITTEES FOR 1969 TO COMPLETE RESOLUTION N0. 3-1969.(Tabled 1/6/69)
'
PIATS AND SUBDIVISIOI�'S - STREET AND UTILITIES (3 Year term - 5 members)
' Present Membexs E�x ires Appointee Effective Date
�
'
�
t
�
�
'
�
�
�
�
r
�
William E. Jensen - Chairman
Thomas Myhra - Vice Chairman
Donald Batterson
Harry Crowder
Daryl Nagel
489 Rice Creek Terrace
Fridley, Minnesota 55432 12-31-68
r ^
L " :���[.8i}�% Upon appointment.
4 �il /��.� rZP��4�—'" �/
Ll,'cdj'-c.ey �} 12.-r.�-� , �O �F �
/� O
7
FRIDLEY INDUSTR7AL DEVELOPMENT COt�,+SISSZON (No date of expiration or apecific
number of inembers designated
David 0. Aarris
470 Rice Creek Blvd.
Robert E. Christenson
231 Rice Creek Terrace
Virgil C. Herrick
5700 Tennison Drlve
Donald R. Mittelstadt
6940 Hiclwry prive
Leonard Samuelson
7800 Eas[ River Road
Robert Schroer
7886 Firwood Way N.E.
L. E. Torrey
I-694 at Main Street N.E.
Present Members
Charlea E. Johanson
160 Hartman Circle
Donald Stotts
5250 Taylor Street N.E.
William Drigans
2060 Lynde Drive
George Zeglen
841 Rice Creek Terrace
Tom Dean
739 Mississippi Street
Charles Hall
5818 Hackmann Avenue
William E. .Iensen
589 Rice Creek Terrace
Don Blair
206 Rice Creek Blvd.
4�
s
1�T� T0; Homer R. Ankrum, City Manager
2Q�1i0 FROl�I: Nasim M. Quzeshi, City Engineer-Director Planning
Iffi�90 AATE: 7anuary 22, 1969
1�II�M0 NUFIBER: CM �69-01
RL:
�
�
6. 1
As you have supplied me with documents covering the City of
Minneapolis offer in regard to additional capacity to NSSSD� report dated
January 6, 1969, and the memorandum of Midland Consultants, Inc. to NSSSD
Board dated December 31, 1968� 7anuary 14, 1969 in response to this offer� for
my comnents. I have reviewed these two documenta in a very preliminary way
as a detailed study would take a considerable amount of time, and due to the
limitation of time, I would like to make just a few observations.
A comparison is made below between the fLow capacity figures
relationship in the Minneapolis East interceptor between Oak and LOth Avenue�
for just as an example�in the report eactension of sewage vorks in the
liinneapolis-St. Paul area prepared by Toltz, King, Duval, Anderson and
Associates dated September I960 and the figures given out by the report
submitted to the Pollution Control by the City of Minneapolis under the
signature ot E. A. Thompson, City Coordinator, dated January 6, 1969.
It is pretty evident a comparison of column 4 and column 7, that even if the
estimated stoztn sewer flow is completely eliminated, the difference of esti-
mates made in 1960 by the Toltz report and the report made by the City Co-
ordinator of the City of Minneapolis is 15.2 million gallons per day.
' �1)
� Location
r
FLOW CAPACITY REi�ATIONSHIP MINNEAPOLIS EAST INTERCEPTOR
(2) (3) (4) (5) (6) C7) ($)
Dist, Intercep. Table 28-4 Est. Est. Est. 1980 Diff. bet.
Sexved Capacity Est. 1980 Storm Total Total Co1.4 &
MGD Peak Sewage Water Peak Peak Flow Col. 1
Flow - 1960 Allot- Flow January
Bteport ment 1960 1969
. 1960 &eport Thompson
Report Aeport
�
• lOth Ave. M-20
SB
65.8 50.8
, Fran From From
8xhibit Ex. Ex.
'A8C A�C A&C
From
Ex.
C
10.4 61.2
From From
Ex. Ex.
C C
35.63
From
Sxhibit
A
15.2
_4�3-
1
,
Mema: CM #69-01
City Manager
Yage 1wo
4�3-�.
� This kind of difference is true throughout the diffezent loca-
tions of the interceptor. Minneapolis' answer to this is that they have been
able to negotiate new contracts with suburban areas draining in[o thia inter-
� eeptor. Secondly, [hey have been able to reevalnate this interceptor capacity
based on extensive storm water separation progra�. We have no way of checking
these statements unless we go into Minneapolis recozda and thoroughly resesrch
their figures and data. I fail to see that any suburban co�unity will have
� aigned a contract recently with Minneapolia for a eapacity less than what they
had been allocated before. Fridley gets 2.65 c.f.s. capacity as indicated on
Che exhibit "B". This is not less than what we had before.
Bven if we assume this ie true, the question arises why Minneapolis
vaited until thia time, when NSSSD had gone thrwgh a court case and is at the
verge of getting a permit from the Water Pollution Control Agency for the plant.
The City of Fridley has been negotiating with Hinneapolis in the past to get
addiCional capacity and Minneapolis has not made an offer indicating to us that
there is e Large amount of capacity in the order of i8 million gallons available
in their interceptor. When NSSSD in 1963 eigned the eontract with Minneapolis,
they indieated to Minneapolia there was 14.5 c.f.s. maxiuwm capacity available
in their interceptor and no more. •
It ie aLso odd that Minneapolis, in the form of a letter to NSSSD
on December 31, 1968, indicated a capacity availability of 18 million gallons
per day in their line and on January 6, 1969, they offered a capacity of 34
million gallons per day before the Water Pollution Conl-rol hearing. Is it pos-
aible that these statementa are being made other Chan just eound Engineering.
Judgment and design.
There ia a question,the interceptor system for NSSSD is designed
for the capacity of 78 million gallons per day whereas the capacity offer from
t�tinneapolis is 34 million gallons per day. NSSSD ahould really seek a full
tolution and provide adequate capacity compatible with their interceptor sys[em.
The North area cou2d get filled up very quickly if the airport is developed in
the North area.
If the Minneapolia offer is genuine and based on good engineering
•tandarda and practices, it should be thoroughly studied and aIl the cost com-
parison made so that it is established that it ia economically cheaper to go
into Mlnneapolis. If NSSSD cannot get 78 million gallons per day capacity
through Minneapolis lines, then the next thing to check is if NSSSD can get 34
million gallon capacity, maybe a smaller plant cwld be proposed on Fridley site
and construction delayed until the NSSSD reaches its capacity, close to 34 miilior
gallona per day. Maybe by [hen we would have a different [ype method of dis-
posing our aewage and treatment. John Badalich of Pollution Control Agency has
iadioated that they are making computor model studies for the different locations
of plants on the river, proposed and existing, and this will indicate what [ype
of treatmen[ would be necessary. There is no question that there ia additional
plant capecity available at Pig's Eye and this could be added onto as the needs
dictate over a period of time.
'' liemo : CM #69 - Ol
City Hanager
Page �hree
'
�
I
�
�
'
�
�
�
�
�
,
'
�
�
4� j
Conclusion: It is atrange that Minneapolis waited so long'to
make this offer and this offer is made when NSSSD is almost on the verge of
gntting the permit for the plant. I feel the District's atand should be that
they �hould be given the permit for the plant anyway as long as they are willing
to meet all the reasonable standards for the river established by the Pollution
Control Agency. Once this permit is obtained, then they should thoroughly
seseaXCh the Minneapolis offer and make a detailed engineering and ecanomic
study. May,be once NSSSD gets the permit, the quality of Minneapolis offer may
imprave. I do feel the Minneapolis offer is wor[h giving due consideratfon
and sCudy.
�� / � � :
.,,c�Q�L(^L�,t l�'�• ,,.cC��4�4.
�1ASIM M. QURESHI, P.E.
City Engineer-Director Planning
�Ie�-1
�I�
OO
�
�
.i �
u
N
a
U
M
N
�
C
N
,aol�
6
. �
�
� �
r-i
O
��a #*sr #�sc ; ��1��a #�x v'
r� co t� v� m�� �+ .-� rn
� ,n °
[� l� .i N N.-1 N N �(1 i �O �.r-1 M C7 (YJ � � � N
• • • • • • i • • � • • �
N v� .-i f'1 .� O M'r �l i 7.n f'J N l.n M i� �•-1 2
r-I M N N�! � t+1 R1 .i �`"1��C1 .i 1!� h lf� h.-� � .
' O
. y�
' �
��� *�� ��� � �x�� #�a �x��
,. �
.
. �, ��� ��
�� °ti°no J �M� 'O�PN c-�r�r (�
N N �'�J �` • • • • j • • • • • • . (q 4a
t� t! i N r-i O� .-� r1 O� �O !� tn O M.-1 O� .� N N Z O
ri M N N t7 N tn d' .-1 ��.-1 lf� l� L1� t� .�1 .
C � •
v .'7 �"�
0
• 'p i�
tlf C • Qi
�c ?� � roo .x
�(c �k 3t # �k 3t # � 3k # �k 7k # �k � �K. * 3� R N ri fa
O�' V O O O N 11 c0 .� ��O �O �O •D O V O 'O H'� C
(�. ri M M[� O V1 O� M Q� M.—�
. • • . . • • • • .
N M� N i`�') � ��.C-t t�l� �� l� CO ri ��') N +� �C ..�1
I`- pp V
N W
f;
�
G V � T
O N f7
o i� H C
# # a� e w «�i
* * 3t # * 7# �k � �t # # � # # � � # * ...� O. � cQn w
O�7��1 �^�0��� n.,n- vmo f")h h Mh N - fn N
• • • e • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Cl N y 'O
1� `7.-1 N.� O� q �I f� �O tn O �O �A V f� �D •� ••� •r�
N c'� N � M'cf � sf � �[1 �D v l� OD v h CO � O O o O
4 []. W v
. C G :Z r�l
� 5_ O N�
� � - - E E ao :o
',d � ap � Cp I N � o O.� t�
�' ,� ' ,� �rj !I ,� rti w 4 � a
� a �O �)� � � O O N U
. .y .�i X
ww w
w
z
m
>
a
�N
•
N
w
z
>
a
M
.a
.-�
lq
•
tJ
z
>
a
M
'�I
w
N
>
¢
�
.-�i
8!
w
N
m
�
�
ro
O
�
ci
y
m
C
�
N
�
a
F
fr
RQ
H
�
x
w
o .
�
S
m
b
V
d
O
i
a
�_
t
s.
* '� a �
w .
.
co
v
N
�
.'1
u
U
L`_'.
.
H
�
�
�
��
�
�
r
_� z
s
7
49
1,
1
. _.'. ..., '. -. _ -- .
. .�. . .. . . .
.�
'
1
'
�
�
,
TABLE NO. 12-6
0
11f0 2000 198U 20U0
S�v�aie Sswa4e $ewapa $ewt��
Sev�er Flor Flow Sener Ftow Flow
D[�t*ict MCD MGD Dlstrict MGU MGD
PS-1 2.94 2.97 OS-1 0.:9 U,32
A(AC-1 ' ' BC'I 3.tl7 {.51
ED�3 4.01 {.60 CN-1 i.tli 3.5!
Ri-1� 1.37 5.01 P�'i d 2 1.55 1.79
M-16 1.30 1.50 M-1 i.22 � 3.51
� '_.-f9.6B) (13.11) - U1.761 ��II1.Y2)
L/-!S - -0.15 0,52 M-Z . 0.92 � l.01
ED�1 .0;10 0.12 M-3 0.78 O,tl2
ED-2 � t.21 1.43 M•4 :'1.1� 1.31
��M-l7 ' 7,86 9.98- --M-S - I.S� 1,14
�9.391 Ii0.80� SL-3 L.LS 3.U8
, � M'1{ ��- 0.37 0.42 NH-I 2.s2 � �l.75
SL'2 . t.22 3.b1. RO'3 O.IU 0.11
Ho"1 2.59 2.tl4 GN-1 1.1+ S.1J
►to-i - o.ri o.zs M-o iz.sa ci,�s
/A"13 � - 9.71 11.18 �21.74) (i5.621
(15.73) (t7.8B) M-i O.e1 0.65
- 11' l2 � 1. �0 l. 59 M-8 {. SL S. 03
� . � . . M'9 l.b• _ 1.82
-.----- ... ...., Al'l0 0.16 O.19
� � SL-t D.tl9 1.04
� M-! 1 30. 20 11, 2q
.. . I11:091'� (tL.�i3)
Taal Minneapolis .'...21.09 2�. 19 17.26 �{3.00
?otal Suburb• 1tl.6S 20.87 � 18,67 2f.74
Gund Taal . 39, ?4 {5.02 55.93 64. 74
Nac �wage [lor� are on an awraye annual basis. .
Stwer
Dlstritt
9-22
5-23
3-10
5-11
5-12
5-20
S•!3
s- u
s-is
7otal St. P�ul
Toul SuAurb•
Gr�nd Total
I9B0 2000
-.Scwaae Savase
Flow Flow
:MGD MGD
1.15 1.16
0.65 0.66
0.27 0.31
-� 0.18 0.55
I.0 l.{5
0.33 0.lt
0.92 1.06
i.4e 1.6!
;. zo �. n
9.61 l0.32
9 bl 10•32
TABLE NO. 22•7
IMEACLPTOLt �. �
l9l0 2000
. Sev�ape S�wa��
Srwer Flow Flow
Di.trict MGD :'GD
ME-1 O.10 0:10
MH-1 0.11 � O.p
MH-2 � 1. SO � 2, tq
LD-1 0.12 O.I�
5•21 1.11 I.)4
(1.82) ({. t4)
5-24 0,57 0,62
s-zs o. io o. u
5-19 l. U .. 1.52
S'9 0.32 0.36
5-27 O.10 0.10
5-JS O.I! 0,�2
S-8 0. 29 0. )0
5-7 0.l1 0.86
5•28 0.10 0,10
5-17 5.9{ 6.67
11.00 12, IO
2.63 3,�0
13.63 15,50
NaRa Sevags [low� are on an x�e:age tnnual ba�i�.
JO
19r0 2000 � .
Swa�e Seway
S�wer - �FIoW . .. Flor . . . .
Dietrict MGD d'1GD �
7CA-1 0.0 b.0 •
NP-1 L.02 .2,02
SA-1 0.75 9.YB
FP-1 S��'
CH-1
HI-1 � 0.08 ,0.13 -� - �
M-21 L.l7 2.i5 -
� (I5.64) (IO.BU)
M-23 l.bb 1.79
M-22 2.51-. .2,bi �-
M-21 � 5. i0 5. 75 - .
M-20 3.03 3.1q
TCA-2 6.0 o.0 �
l.A-1 0.32 . 0.l� _.- _ .:..
sw-z o.a u.ux
M-19 6.93 �7.12 - -
(t1.371 f13.5q r- _... .. .
M-18 D. ){ 0. i9
M-25 � 0.11 Q.19 . . -
� 22.�1 23.et �
19.07 LO.b1
42.Otl {4.29
_ _ .. _ . . .. . .. . .
1
_1MEItCEPSOA -. � ."-
1980 2000 . .
5<waee Sev�aKe
Se.er Flow Flo�v
Di�trict MGD MGD
5-31 0.45 O.SI -�
WS-1 1.63 I, 91
S-3l - 0,24 ��0,28
. . (1.�71 R.191
WS-2 0.49 O.SB
5-72 0.43 � 0.50
�o.n� p.oei
WS-3 0. 30 0, 3�
3-31 O.Sb 0.6�
(0. /6) .: (t. 0�1) �. t
5-18 2. Sb ' i. 62 .
5-26 0. 7D 0�. T!
5-6 B.61 9.36�..i .
p'. '
U.6] 1{.69
2.�2 2.86
16.05 I7.55
EXHIBIT B
, TABLE NO. 28-4
' FLOW CAPACITY RELATIONSHIPS FOR MINNEAPOLIS-
EAST WTERCEPTOR - CORE AREA TRIBUTARY
S1
-.�- ...
��
i
E �,
' � Year 1980 Year 2000 : , • �.
Exceu Fscsw ; � : �
Inter- L�t,Ma:, &orm or £�t.Max. &orm o+ � � �
ceptor Dry Water Ddi- Dry Mat�r D�fl- �
Capacity Weath�r AIIM- iotal ciect Wwther Allob iotal d�nt -
' Loutim MGD Flov� ment Flo�v Capacity Flow� meM Flo. Capaeity ;
t
1lKer 9qtlo�
B5. S 75. 7 12. B 88. 5 - 3. 0 79. 7 10. 2 B9. 9 - 4. � 4,
Gcil St. f
' 85.5 75.4 12.0 87.4 - 1.9 79.4 10.2 19.6 - 4.1 �_
� . . 27th Ave, �
� . U. 2 74. 8 10. { 85. 2 -�. 0 76. 7 30. 2 B6. 9 - 5. i -
� O�k !t. �.�.�. ...�_--.-. �.
65.8 S0:• 10.4 61.2 1.6 54.3 30,2 64.5 - 1.3 �-
..� .�. � �
. ._._'_. __. _._R. ._.
.' _ . .. _` . . ..,_. . . Sl.�� - {5.{ � !.9_ _.54.3 � - 2.5 48.6 � �8.6 57.2 - - 5.� ..�) . . -.
2nd 8t. i '
.. . . I11J 15.4 !.9 54.3 _ 57.5 {8.6 6.6 57.2 54.6
' ' a[aia /t. - � . . .
114.1 45.0 � 65.0 110.0 1,l 4{,0 65.0 113.0 l.l
91.4 45.0 65.0 110.0 - 1l.6 4l.0 65.0 11i.0 - 21.6
�- ]09.0 45.0 65.0 110.0 - 1.0 1l.0 65.0 I13.0 -{.0
lOB.4 �5.0 65.0 1I0.0 - 1,6 48�.0 65.0 113.0 - 4.6
, k .
3rd Av�.
13{. ♦ 35. 7 65.0 100. 7 33. 7 38. 2 65. 0 103. 2 31. 2
! lth Av�.
105.7 32.9 0.6 33.5 72.2 33.5 0.3 33.8 71.9 � �
' 1]0.1 32.9 0.6 33.5 %.6 33.5 0.3 33.� %.7
ez.a 32.9 0.6 33.5 49.) 33.5 0.3 33.! 49.0
95.9 32.9 0.6 33.5 62.4 33.5 0.3 33./ 62.1
5T.9 32.9 0.6 33.5 22.4 33.5 0.3 33.t 24.1
, 22nd Av�.
19.1 z9.7 0.0 29.7 - 10.5 30.2 � 0.0 70.2 - 11.a
31�t Av�.
'
� ST. PAUL MISSISSIPPI RIVER BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR
, Figure No. 28-13, Flow-Capacity Relarionship
Diagrams of the St. Paul Misaissippi River Boulevard 7nter-
ceptos, ahows a slight capacity deficieacy during periods of
' wet weather flow in the section from Portland Avenue to the ,
Joiat Intereeptor. However, when the storm water separa-
tioa progran► ia completed, thie situation will be alleviated ro
, that the .capacity deficieacy is aegligible by the year 2000.
These flows are given in tabular form on Table No. 28-5.
' EXHIBIT C
' 28-14 �
'
i
_
�
,� .
�
:'.
.��� �
LEXINGTON
, `
'
PINES �
ILNRC ^� i SNORE VIEW i°� � i --
� PARK
��YN PARK �-'-"- � i -�------1 .__ � r �
i MOUNDS � �--- �
� V�EW � � � 9 NORTH i
---» � � � OANS �� WHITE B
�
, -"- -"----- FRIOI.EY i �- � 1 `- i � ��LAK�r.
,E�,t � � � � `� -- `= —� /BI'--
� lROOKLYN 9r i i � —� � o,-- �
� CENT R � �—� L�
_ � � � �gg � � � VAGNAIS i � ��
i� �---aNEW �� g j i EIOHTS r� �
�AL jHIl�41TOP �BRIGHTON� AR EN �� •4 ;��MY
� ----�— r_i :�' F— l NILLS 1 ; AKE�
� i i B , � � •__ ��— � �
! �__ui JHEIO TSA�, � � I � � j t-- - 8 �—�
7 �1_���__���_; 2F-___.�__�_�_ _ 1 �__—___ J—__
�_� i I� �` j CANADA T_' --
L Zj ; F� i 0 ��
�---+ �' o-1oi L_ �i ROSEVILLE � �
��_� . C-101 ` �� j `_�
i i-ta � �}AtUDERDALE � --`
� r/� FA� �:ON j �� MAPLEWOOD
i� MEIOHTS r--°—�-----'--_°°_--�------
� 0-100 �-+--1 �J
A E; j � � ; �
� �----
�� � j YINNEAPOLIS - SAIN1 PAUL SANITARY
-� � � OISTAICT 101NT INTERCEPTOA
�„� MNNEAPOLIS ' ST PAU�
,� 1 ����Om��mO� 4Q ►LAWA6E
1 � e. —� OO
�� 6
' �
i
_�J _ _� 1.._I �__��_�__
i � ;
!f' I MIlES � � M� � I -
�p� •-- ; � wEar . �
=' ! f� j ST. PAUL i
'., .
�
r
' PROPOSED INTERCEPTOR SEWER�S EXHIBIT D
i2
MU00 ��
r-- --�
� J- j
i �.
j r--
I
�
�
1
1
I
1
I
1
, .
. !
P
IRC -
W �
J
O
6
H
W
Jt
p4
�3�
F
,
'
'
'
�
,
,
'
'
'
,
�
�
'
'
'
,
,
,
a
MINNEAPOI.IS PROPOSrD SOLiJ'l'ION .TO TH� N. S. S. S. D. �
SEWERAGE DISPOSAI. l: ;iOi;I.1?A�_ 'fQ THI; Y�AP. 7.000
An offer by the City of Minneapolis to permanently serve the NSSSD by a
direct connection through the City of Minneapolis for treatment at the Minneapolis-
St. Paul Sanitary District.
Whereas the estimated cost by NSSSD of a regional treatment plant to
initially serve them in 1972 is $8, 000, 000 and ultimately $27, 000, 000 for a
larger undefined area as stated in thefr presentation to the D4etropolitan
Council on December 19, 1868.
Whereas the City of Minneapolis estimates an initial cost of $7, 600, 000
including an outfall and pumping atation addition for a 18 mgd plant and
$14,100,.000 for 34 mgd plant design to serve the present NSSSD service area.
Whereas the estimated share of capftal costs to the NSSSD of a new
agreement with the City of Minneapolfs along similar terms as recent agreements
entered into by the City of Minneapolis would be as follows:
Estimated Cost to NSSSD:
lieatment Plant:
Construction to 1961
1962-68 Constructirni
Future expansion
Joint Interceptor
1$ mgd
ioo,000
700,000
400,000
1,500,000
34 mqd
400,000
1,500,U00
800,000
1,500,000
:��
.-2-
N. E. Interceptor
New. N. E. Interceptor
Pumping Station & Force Main Additions
18 m�d
eoo,000
Total Estimated Cost 3, 500, 000
Eetimated Annual Cost of Amortization of
pr4ncipal & interest of 3.9% at 5.68%a
per year
34 m�d
4,000,000
1,300,000
9,500,000
199,000 540,000
Therefore, the City of Minneapolis hereby offers to enter into a new
agreement, which would then eliminate the necessity of building any regional �
sewage treatment plant that would be harmful to the health and recreation
activfties of residents of the Metropolitan Area, effective on January I, 1969 that
would provfde the NSSSD With a permaneut connection of approximately 34 million
gallons per day of average annual sewage flow. The terms of this agreement
would be similar to the terms of the agreement recently approved for the
Viliage of Plymouth and provide for the following:
1) Permanent capacity in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Joint Interceptor
of 34 mgd for the NSSSD at an estimated cost of $1, 500, 000.
2) Rental of the present N.E. Minneapolis Interceptor of up to 18
mgd until a new N. E. Interceptor (G100) is constructed to serve
the entire N. W. Region.
S). The construction and financing of a new N.E. Inierceptor with a
capacity of 70 mgd of auerage annual flow desi,gnecl to serve the
ai`*
-3-
entire N. W. Region of which approxiinately 50°Jo of the capacity and
costa will be allocated to the NSSSD. Total estimated 1969 cost
is $7,g00,000 for this facility.
4) The construction and financing (if desired) of a new force main
and pumping station addition from 37th to 23rd Avenue North
at an estimated 1969 cost of $1, 300, 000 when needed.
5) Annual share of the net financing costs incurred by the CiLy of
Minneapolis for the construction of the Minneapolis-St. Paul
Sanftary District Treatment Plant based upon the proportion of their
annual sewage flow to the total adjusted .Minneapolis and its suburbs
flow at the MSSD.
7�
,
COON RAPIDS
�AMPLIN'
LIN TWP.
,''�OSSEO
r_BROOKLYN PARK
�--•
i
'
W
PE
1
BROOKLYN
CENT.$R
�
VALLE
BLAINE
LEXINGTON �
r
a�C)
LINO LAKES
I --- - L - �-CIRCLE PINES
�.----�--T------, �---- - ---------- - ' -
jSPRINO j `-�i �
i LAKE �� � r_r
SHORE VIEW i--
�PARK_ &^ �'
� ----'--- j---�
i�j MOUNDS j � ���'-- �
�VfEW � �i�3
----- i i :
L�7 1 `_1
FRIDLEY � i � �
�� i i A � �'--r --
� � � i � �
• i ' �� � � VAI
i� 1---.iNEW j � I � HEI
;HI �YTOP iBRiGHTON � qRDEN j� �
_i ;J �.- ��HILLS i
i
�
COLUMBIA��-�A � �-� i � r--
uCl!!uTO _ 1 1 0 �
c-ioi
IDO
\i i
; � MINNEAPOLIS
�1: LOUI3 PARK �
1
� - B
1
_ � `�
* 1 �1 1 1
'11 � � 1 � �
� LL J �
�
�
H U<
RVILLE
�
NORTH�
OAKS j WH
C_ LA
'---I' � -t
$ ir_� 1
`------___J--____L]l
LE �
4DA �
� � _J
I
ROSEV�LLE j � jN0
� i3T.
L----- � � i
IDERDALE �
/� MAPLEWOOD l__
'--------� �^cd
FA� tiON � � (�
HEIGHTS r-----------'----°----�----------
•-i � -� ggg i
1 � � 1
L___ �
� RINNEAPOLIS - SAINT PAUL S'AN!11AY �
DISTAICT 101NT INTEACEPTOA =
1 ST PAUI�1 EX,ST,N� �,,;
����!'I�L��j�a+��.+a� SEWAGE TREA
��� �!�^` PLANT
..�-i �
i i
{ E i'�'� i WEST
LES 3 NILES / MILES ��— � j , ST. PAUL
� 1
PROPOS��I xNTTRCT'PTOR S�W�RS
�
RESOLUTION N0. - 1969
)�
' A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ANQ DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPfCIAL RSSESSMENTS ON
PARCEL 4720, PART OF OUTLOT 1, M£LODY MANOR 4TH ADOITION
� NNEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respeM to certain
land and said land has subsequently been subdivided,
� NOW� THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as followa:
That the assessments levied against the following described parcel, to-wit:
' Pareel 4720, Part of Outlot 1, Metody Manor 4th Addition, may and sfia11 be
apportioned and divided as foilows:
'
'
Original Parcel
Parcel 4720, Outiot i (Ex.
Parcel 4740 and 4780), Meiody
Manor 4th Addition
Division of Parcet Ap�roved
Parcet 4720, Outlot 1 (Ex.
Parcels 4740, 4760, and
4780), Melody Manor 4th
Addition
' Parcei 4760, Outiot 1 (Ex.
ParceTs 4720, 4740, and
4780}, Melody Manor 4th
Addition
Fund
Reguiar S.A. (Sewer
Main)
SW �24 (Sewer Main)
W #34 (Water Main)
SS #24 (Storm Sewer)
1964 Service Conn.
(Water Laterai on
Osborne Road)
Fund
Regutar S.A. (Sewer
Main)
SW #24 (Sewer Main)
N #34 (lJater Main)
SS #24 (Storm Sewer)
19b4 Service Conn.
(Water Lateral on
Osborne Road)
Regular S.A, (Sewer
Main)
SW #24 (Sewer Main)
W #34 (Water Main)
SS #24 (Storm Sewer)
19 �+ Service Conn.
(Water Lateral on
Originat Amount
$ 617.10
i , �►33. 97
1,9$$.73
7, 3�+1.95
3,725.40
i5,t07.15
Original Amount
$ 501.00
1,150.65
1,611.83
5,965.10
1,477.37
$ 116.10
268.56
376.90
1,376.85
' Osborne Road) 2,248.03
15,107.15
' ADOPT�[�� THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of FRIDLEY THIS �� OAY OF
•��� , 14�.
,
'
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell
MAYOR Jack 0. Kirkham
RESOlUTTON N0. ��- 1969
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING 7HE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSh1ENTS
ON'PARCEL 580, LOT 13, BLOCK 3, OAK GROVE ADDITION
WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been tevied with respect to certain
land and said land has subsequently been subdivided,
NO�, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO as foilows:
That the assessments tevied against the foltowing described parcel, to-witc
Parcel 580, Lot 13, Block 3, Oak Grove Addition, may and sha11 be apportioned
and divided as foilows:
Ori�cina) Parcel
Parcei 580, Lot 13, Block 3,
Oak Grove Addition
Division of Parcel Ap rp oved
Parcet 559, N. 20' of Lot 3,
Block 3(Including E'? of aliey
vacated lying adjacent thereto},
Oak Grove Addition
'
Parcel 530, Lot 3 Except N. 20',
' ' Block 3 (Inciuding :"-� of aitey
vacated lying adjacent thereto},
Oak Grove Addition
,
�
�1
1
�
�
Fund
Regular S.A. (Water
and Sewer Mains)
SW #26 (Water and Sewer
Laterals and 1 Water
and t Sewer Service)
ST. 1966-1 (66th Ave.}
ST. 1966-1 (Anoka St.)
Fund
ReguTar S.A. (tJater
and Sewer Mains)
SW �26 (Water and Sewer
Laterals and � Water
and�g Sewer Service)
ST. 1966-1 (b6th Ave.)
ST. 1966-1 (Anoka St.)
Reguiar S.A. (Water
and Sewer Mains}
SW #2b (4later and Sewer
Laterats and �2 lJater
and '2 Sewer Service) 357•96
ST. 1966-t (6bth Ave.) 35.6D
ST. 1966-1 (Anoka St.) 200.40
1,230.02
3 �j 6AY OF
Original Amount
$ 42.10
715.92
71.2a
400.80 �
1,230.02
Original ,4mount
$ 21.05
357.96
35.bo
200.40
$ 21.05
A�OPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
, i�,c,L' ' , 1969.
ATTEST:
CITY CIERK
n C. Brunsell
MAYOR Jack O. Kirkham
J�
.�
'
1
�
RESOLUTION N0. - t969
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND �IRECTIN6 THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
ON PARCEL 1190, LOTS 45-48, BLOCK 6, SPRING BROOK PARK AD�ITION
WFiEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain
land and said land has subsequently been subdivided,
NOW, THEREfORE, BE IT RESOLVE� as follows:
' That the assessments levied against the folloo-zing described parcel, to-wit:
Parcel 1190, Lots 45-48, 31oc4 6, Spring Brook Park Addition, may and shall be
apportioned and divided as follows:
Originat Parcel
Parcet 1190, Lots 45-46,
Block 6, Spring Brook Park
Addition
Division of Parcel Approved
Parcel 1190, Lots 45 & 46,
Block 6, Spring Brook Park
Addition
, Parcel 1195, Lots 47
Block 6, Spring Brook
Addition
��
Fund Oriqinal Amount
SlJ #13 (water and
Sewer Mai�s) Paid
Regular S.A. (Sewer Main) Paid
SW #21 (Water and Sewer
Laterats and 2 Services) Paid
SS #87 (Storm Sewer) $ 577•15
577.15
Fund Original Amount
SW 1�13 (Water and
Sewer Mains) Paid
Regular S.A. (Sewer Main) Paid
SW #21 (Water and Sewer
Laterals and i Service} Paid
SS #87 (Storm Sewer) $ 288.57
& 48, SW #13 (Water and
Park Sewer Mains) Paid
Regutar S.A. (Sewer Main) Paid
SW #21 (Water and Sewer
Laterais and 1 Service} Paid
SS €{87 (Storm Sewer) $ 288.58
577-15
„ ✓
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCII OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _�� DAY OF
��� , 1969.
MAYOR Jack 0. Kirkham
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell
59
�
�
�
,
1
'
1
�
'
'
�_1
'
�
,
�
'
,
,
�
nrrttc.�rxaa� roe rs�= ro rnt,xio caccvr�n aaffi rRnuss
It is lureby r�que�ted that (I) (iiej be i�su,ed a houM trailer pe:mlt in
eospli.+l4ce rith Chapeer 41. City Cod� of Pridley, �ip�e�ota, 1963 b� reason
of tM lollwtagt
a. liar and perrwnt addraas of applicant
b. Oroezship of trail�rs Northara Paaifie p�. Ca.
¢. Ds�eription of tsailez - li�ke and Siae: Cliff iadustries Model F1046i
10� : 42�
d. liase aad addt�ss of arner of Land �h�re trail�r is propwed Co be
locattd: 1i�rthesa Fatifie !�. Ce., St, lanl, !!lns. ,
•. Pariod of tise tzsiler co be stored or oceupied; I�defieite tera ,
f. U�o of trailess �•p•Transpert Dispatchisg Office
g. Sigoatnre o! adjoining property oroer� grutisY approvalt
llst aonl�,cable
h, Locatton of trailer on propoaed property - attach plat plan of
propertpp Ylat attachad
i. fi6ere trail�z is to be occupied, (1) i�fiat fs naltiouship, i! aa�.
b�tw�n trailer arnar end Lsnd wnerT Sai�
(2) Nawes �ad ages oi all occupants4 �� Kcupants,
�__ 8 hrs./day. Clerical
(3) ?acilitie� for seaage disposal, �ates rad e2eetrieitqY
Elactricit� bv evaer: sares 6 wtas b�i�e aeo i� fer
(4) 8mploy�aat of applicsnt? Tnaspo�t Ca�pa�
(S) W6ethes applicaat ie eonetracting hor in areat Ne
T� applic�tion, �6en pr�unted to ehe City Oouaeil, �bali ehov the seeoee�-
datloo oY tLe Zoniog Ad�ini�traeor and/or Buildiog Inrpector. ,.
P1� !!od attac6sd cbeak ln tbe aiaount of (#5.00 for parkin� (;23.00 for
oecup�lo� a howe tsail�r.
�s-s� !�l�as..�
�iDivlai�a Ssgi�er
�n
BUILDING STANpARDS-DESIGN CONLROL SOBCOIMIITTSE MEETING HINUTES JANUARY 22 1969
The meeting vas called to order by Acting Chairmaa Biermann at 8:07 P. M.
ROI.L CAI.L:
Zffi��BRS PRESENT: Biermann, Hauge, Tonco
MP.l�BRS ABS2Nf; Erickaon, Sornson
OTHSRS PBHSENI'; Nasim M. Qureahi, City Engineer, Peter Herlofaky, Sr. Engiaeeriag
Aide, Henry Muhich, Building Official
1
Mr. Yalph Bro[hen and Mr. Robert Brown were present to presen[ his request.
The following points were discussed:
1. Concrete curbing (as marked on the plans.)
2. 10 foot driveway radii minimum size.
3• Parkiag atalle to be designated.
4. A more complete plot plan ia needed.
5. Archltectural plane, aec[ions, and elevations apecifying material to
be uaed is needed.
MOTION by Hauge to reco�emd approval of a foundation permi[ for the building
only, as preaented on [he plaas and subject to the items 1 thru 5 as discusaed.
Saconded by Tonco. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays the motion carried
uasnimously.
ADJOtTHI�NT •
The meetfng adjouraed at 9:05 P. M.
H tfully submitted,
R i�BI,O KY
Senior Engineering de
fi]
_ a
�'��
YLANNING COFMLSSION MEETING JANUARY 30, 1969 PAGE 1
The q�eeting was called to order by Chaix�an Erickson at 7:35 P.M.
�OLL CALL•
M�bers Present: Myhra, Exickson, Mittelatadt, Jenaen, Fitzpatrick
Others Present: Engineeriug Asaiatant Darrel Clark, City Manager
Homer R. Ankrum
' APPROVE PI.ANNING COZSIISSION MINUT&S: JANUARY 8. 1969:
MOTION by Jenaen, eeconded by Myhra, that the Planning Co�ieaion Minutea
of January 8, 1969 be apprwad. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the
' motion carried unanimously.
BBCEIVB BUILDING STANDARDS-D&SIGN CONTROL MINUTSS: JANUARY 15. 1969:
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Mitteletadt, that the Planning Co�iesion
receive the Suilding Standarde-Deeign Control Subco�ittee minutes of
Janusry 15, 1969. Upon a voice vote� all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
RSCBIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN JONTROL MLNUTSS: JANUARY 22. 1969:
MOTION by Myhra, eeconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Co�isaion
receive the Building Standarde-Design Control Subco�ittee miautes �f
January 22, 1969. Upon a voiee vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
RECEIVS PLATS 6 SUBDNISIONS-STRSETS & UTiLITIBS SUBCOt4IITTE$ MINUTES:
JANUAAY 16, 1969•
The following typographlcsl conection wae suggeeted by Mr. Jensen:
Item 3 on page 3, the last aenteace of the motion should read:"---- the
alignment of Main Street fram 79th Avenue South to 77th Avetrue, should
deflect to the 8ast ---."
140TION by Mittelatadt, asconded by Jensen, that the Planaing Crnrmission
receive the Plata 6 Subdivlsions-Streete � Utilities Subco�ittee minutee
of January 16, 1969 with the abwe correction. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, the motion canied unanimouely.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZO�iING R�flUEST. ZOA #68-13. HATIl�IERLUND ENTERPRISSS, INC.:
Parcel 10 and 200 (North 903 ft. of East 3/4 of NE'� of NE'� of Section 13).
Rezone from R-1 to R-3A.
Clarence D. Nordatrom repseaenting Aa�erlund Enterprises, Inc, was
preaent.
Chairman Erickeon read the Public Heering Notice.
a
+- Planninse Co�ission Meetina - Januarv 30, 1969 PaQe 2
Mr. Nordatrom explained that this land ie located directly aouth of the
Studebaker-Onan plant. He made a study as to the feasibility of cocimerciel
or induatrial for thie land which showed that thia type of property really
would not be desirable or feasible for co�ercial. He checked with Super Valu
and Red Ow2 who informed him it wae not in the proper location. Small stores
would be strip zoning and he did not believe the City would want that. They
were asking R-3A for the use of the land because, under FHA, all the special
assesaments would have to be paid, and that would amount to approximately
$3,500 per reaidential lot which would mean they would have to pay approxi-
mately $7,000 per lot, and this is out of the question.
The suggested use of R-3A for this land, approximately 29 2/3 acrea,
would allow 18 acres for buildable sites. The terrain south of the proposed
apartment complex could be used as a park. Thia would be donated by deed to
the City of Fridley if they wished to accept it, or the developers could use
it for a private park, or possibly build single family dwellings on the banks
of the creek. Mr. Nordstrom said that he can obtain the kind of financing
he can live with, and he hae the contract to build from Ha�erlund Enterpriaea,
Inc. He referred to a letter written to the Council asking to be put on their
agenda for a public hearing, but was told they would wait for the Planning
Co�iseion to make a reco�endation, and the firat public hearing date before
Council would probably be the second meeting in March. This was satiafactory
to him.
Chaizman Erickaon aeked who was the owner of the houae at 1500 County Road
H, and Mr. Nordetrom anawered the present owner purchased the property from
Mr. Hipy, a tenant lives in the house, and all three have been notified of the
public hearing.
In anewer to the questions regarding utilities, the Engineering Asaistant
stated that sewer ie available on 69th Avenue. There is a 10" line on
Central Avenue and an S" watermain xuns down 69th Avenue.
Mr. Nordstrom said there would be no problem with the soil.
Mr. Myhra felt that at this point, perhaps the C�ission would want an
opinioa fram the Engineering Department with reference to the utility capacities,
According to the Engineering Assistant, it had not heen checked. HoF.ever,
the lines on 69th Avenue are isolated and only serve the people on 69th Avenue.
IyDTION by Myhra, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Co�iesion
close the public hearing, ZOA �68-13, Ha�erlund Enterpriaea, Inc, to rezone
the North 903 feet of the East 3/4 of the NE'� of the NEy of Section 13,
(Parcel 10 and 200) from R-1 (single family district) to R-3A (apartments and
�ltiple dwelling diatricta). Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
I�TION by Myhra, aeconded by Fitzpatrick, that the rezoning request,
ZOA #68-13, Ha�erlund Enterpriaes, Inc. be continued to February 13, 1969
meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimouely.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #69-01 PEMTOM INC : That part of
of SE'� of Section 24 that lies North of Hwy. �100 right of way to rezone
from R-1 (single family dwelling diatrict) to Planned Development.
Chairman Erickaon read the public hearing notice.
�
� Pla�ina Coffiission Meetins - Januarv 30, 1969 PaQe 3
Bruce Thomson, President of Pemtom, Incorporated, told the audience
this proposed P.D. xequest coneiated of 155 acrea, 120 of which we;e in
Fridley. The Company had built New Brighton Square and Windsor Green. He
then aeked Bob Engstxom, Vice President and Officer in charge of iand plan-
ning, to take wer.
Mr. Engstrom said he had prepared a preaentation which would give a
atart of what they are trying to accomplish. He said he understan$s under
P.D. they did not necessarily have to submit a proposed use, but give the
eize of the development; that as they were option holders of the property,
it was necessary they submit a plan of what the ultimate development would
be. A lot of time has been spent atudying the area. They have tried to
ahow reapect for the overall framework of the City of Fridley, tra�fic
pattern, integrating of existing residential neighborhood; they have ahown
iespect of the land itself. In order to illustrate a couple of the things
they have accomplished and give a little idea of their attempts, they
showed pictures of the new concept in Burnsville, Windsor Green, underground
utilities, children on playground apparatus, Walden with m�ch of its existing
treee. He said that under P.D, concept, you submit landscape plana, build-
ing plans and deliver what you say you are going to deliver. They looked
on this area as one of the better ones to be developed in the metropolitan
area.
Mr. Engatrom introduced Mr. Contoski who works on the staff as a planner.
Mr. Contoski uaed maps for his discussion. He said that the first thing they
have to coneider in planning any area is the characterics of the plat
and the sunounding area. The area in New Brighton is relatively flat,
and the property ia more rugged as you go into Fridley. There are eteep
slopes, nu�rous potholes and awamps and is heavily wooded. It offers
besutiful possibilities for certain types of development. Interstate #694
is directly south and fornie an imposing land barrier. To the East, the
New Brightoa side is zoned co�ercial and property owned by St. Mary's
Hoapital, Grace High School on the North and residential on the West.
They do not think the area would be well suited for single family
because of the rugged terrain, but they believe the area would be very suitable
to their towahouae type of development.
Their thinking in reapect to traffic pattern: The principle facility
and major entrance would be through Silver Lake Road and would also be the
future major road to the Hospital. A road would continue to Arthur Street.
Gardana Avenue is a significant collector etreet, being the only street to
connect to Central Avemie and to Silver Lake Road. Second access point to
Silver Lake Road is independent of the hospital access and would connect
with Hillwind Road. Aillwind Road goes around the residential rather than
through it. A coimection will be made to Regis Lane from Matterhorn Ilrive.
The road alignment would be such that it does not encourage traffic into
present reeidential area.
Because of the gradation of the land, the order of buildings would be
aingle family townhouses to apartments of inedium density and aparta4ents of
high deneity as you go East.
` Plam�init Co�ission Meetixtst - Januarv 30, 1969 PaAe 4
�eg1s Lane: The original purpoae was to give the children dirqct accesa
to the achool. At the present time most of the children from Chis $rea
would probably be buased. The Matterhorn exteneion would be for thq catholic
school.
Hillwind Rnad - Central Avenue: They talked to the Highway Degart�nt,
ahwed them the plan, and the Righway Department said they will very definitely
do eomething to thie inCersection. They will ait down and work out which way
Fridley wants to go with it and expressed interest in eitting down with
Fridley and working.
Review Density - Townhouae Area: Mr. Contoaki said there were 1,220
units in the whole area, and of that amount, Fridley had 780. He said they
did not, as yet, design apecific buildings fox this area. It will be
eeveral years before it will be developed and then it will be in definite
etages.
Mr. Engatrom said they would attempt to establish two tawnhouse neigh-
borhoods with two diffeient architectural deaigns. Generally the prices
range in excess of $35,000. At the rate of rising conetruction coats, they
are experiencing an incresse of 10% per year. Regarding the character of
the multiple dwellings, they will attempt to follow a eimilar pattern as far
ae being able to come up with a epecial deaign to adapt to the terraine and
be compatible with the other architectuxe. Mr. Engstrom eaid they were
intereated in sCarting one of the townhouse neighborhoods as soon as utilities
would be available. When asked about the cloeing date for the whole procedure,
Mr. Engstrom anawered in about four years. 11ie Fridley aide is really the
key to the whole area. It is a smaller parcel and without the apprwal of
the Fridley area, they would be in no position to start the project. The
thirty-five acres in New Brighton is under option.
Ja�s Polzak, 1527 Trollhagen Drive: (Attorney, advisor and director
of Imiabruck Home Ownera) I want to point out first that, frankly, we ask
this rezoning be not appraved. Much has been said about the traffic pattern.
We have a concern for Fridley ae a whole. In all of Fridley, you re,ally
do not have too many area developments to aupport $35,000 homes. We would
like to see the same kind of development as we have in Innsbruck. It is
about the only area left to support that kind of dwelling. We urge, for
the interest of the City, not to rezone.
Henman F. Bergman, 5503 Regis Trail: Pemtom has done a tremendous job.
1he slides were interesting because of comparisons between their trnmhouees
and trailer courta, I would like to see slideo of comparisone of single
fsmily reaidencee. The intention of rezoning ie for multiple familp dwel-
lings and my opinion of their intentiona is they ahould have come faisrard
with a request for R-3. They are asking for Planned Development. The plane
they have ahoum or have been identified are merely current thought. if that
is true, if they are seking for P.D. on that banis, what they are really
saking for ia wide open aoning.
Mr. Bergman contiaued that the traffic pattern was presented fairly
well. I would like to point out there really ie no acceas to the Weat ae
ahaan. (Mr. Bergman used the chart). The traffic down Aillwind Road to
Highway �65 icrvolves eix cornera plus entrance to a gas etation at �his
interaection. it is a fairly hazardous entrance. (A member from the
sudience added a Drive-In �hg�,�Fe ge wgll), All of these exits are on
4 PlsuII *+a Co�ission MeetinA - Januarv 30 1969 Pa$c 5
T=unk Highway #65. The one which is moat difHcult to negotiate 1e Hi%4vi�s�
Road. It ia very seldam used because Old Central is the through street and
hae primary shot at the Highwsy.
Mr. Bergioan concluded that Pemtom'e objective is to get good depaity
out of this land and that is exactly what we can't stand. 3ingle fa�ily
residencea would mean lower denaity and that'e what should go in. Thia land
is landlociced and we are landlocked now.
Waldo Hoffman, 1333 Hillwind Rnad: He preaented a petitfon from 100%
of the home o�mers on Hillwind Road which are in opposition to the rezoning.
MOTION by Jensen, aeconded by Mittelatadt, that the Planning Co�ieeion
receive the petition circulated by Mr. Waldo Hoffman opposing the reaoning
request, ZOA $69-01, Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
Richard E. Hudrlik, 5502 Regis Trail: I aerlously queetion rezoning
from &-1 to P.D. It aee�s they are really aeking for R-3.
Mr, Hudrlik presented a petition with 25 names of people of the Hathaway
Lane ares who are oppoaed to the rezoning.
MOTION by ,Tenaen, aeconded by Myhra, thst the Planning Co�ieaion receive
the petition circulated by Mr. Hudrlilc dated January 20 and 21, 1969 opposing
the rezoning petition, ZOA #69-01. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the
motion canied unanimously.
R. J. Reed� 1204 Regie Terrace: He etated the schools are already
crowded and that Columbia Heighte is building a temporary school. P.D.
rezoning would increase the deneity to a point where it would be too much
of a burden on the schools.
Mr. Reed presented a peti[ion against the rezoning.
I�fOTION by Myhra, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Co�aieaion
receive the petition circulated by Mr. R. ,T. Reed dated January 20, ],969
oppoeing the rezoning petition, ZOA �69-01. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting
aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Lawell C. Mellum, 5517 Regia Trail: He had a petition sigaed by 26 home
awnera on Regis Trail. He wished to state they have im�ested a coneiderable
amount of money in the co�unity, snd feel their request ie really for A-3
zoning. A buffer zone of 135 feet is a emall buffar. It is unlikely anybody
would buy theee late with I70 unit townhousea, 1200 unit apartments, and witfi
a petition, could double that depending how the land goee.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelatsdt, that the Planning Co�isaion
receive the petition circulated by Lowell C. Mellum dated January 20, 21 and
29, 1969 oppoeing the rezoning petition, ZOA $69-01. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, the motion canied unanimously.
Linda Pettereon, 5679 Regie Trail: My property facea the back qf it.
When we moved here eeven yeare ago, only four familiee were in this area:
There was practically no traffic problem; the echool is two blocks apay.
Plazmine Coumisaion Meetinz - Januarv 30. 1969 P�a 6
We inquired about the land behind us and was told it was zoned reaides�tial.
This is the aecond time we have had to ca�me here. I wae told that the City,
when originally laid out their property, laid it out commercial, residential,
maltiple to consider what is the beat for the City. Now why do you have to
revieR. this every year. I don't think it ie right. Thie ie a petitiqn fram
Lynde Drive.
1�TION by Jenaen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Coumieaion
receive the petition circulated by Linda Petterson dated Jamury 26 ead 27,
1969 on Lynde Drive opposing the rezoning petition, ZOA �69-01. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimoualy.
In answer to Mr. Polzak's question, Chaix�an Erickson esid the president of
Acree, Inc., John Johnson, aigned the awner's requeet for rezoning.
Jean Bukovich, 1244 Regie Terrace: She etated she had a petitioq of 24
names of the reaidents on the south aide of Lqnde Drive, and they feel very
atrongly the land ahould remain residential for the benefit of the City of
Fridley.
I�TION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Jeasen, that the Plamiing Co�ieaion
receive the petition circulated by Jean Bukovich dated January 26, 27, and
28� 1969 oppoaing the rezoning petition, ZOA #69-01. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, the motion canied unanimouely.
Fienry Wahlberg, 5659'Regis Trail: I think the image of the City of
Fridley must be considered, also. I don't know if thie ia the total iaoage we
want. I feel if this area wae developed into a nice reaidential area, it
would be a much greater aeset to our City instead of apartment develop�ent.
If thie ie developed th� �ue as in I�ebruck, we could be proud, but not
if it is apar�ent development.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Co�iaeion
receive the petition circulated by William A. Metz dated Jaswary 20, 1969
oppoeing the rezoning petition, ZOA $69-01. Upon a voice vote, all voCing aye,
the motion canied unanimously.
William D. Shontz, 5547 Regie 1Yai1: He eaid the area ie fairly well
eaturated with townhouses at the present time. Under the P.D. rezoning, the
developer could claim hardahip in a number of yeara claiming the townhouae
is tto longer feasible and that the whole area ohould be put into apartmenta.
I understand there is eome problem with P.D. in the past.
He presented a petition signed by 100x of the people living on Hathaway
Lane.
i�DTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Pluming Co�iseion
receive the petition circulated by William D. Shontz dated January 19, 1969
opposing the rezoning petition, ZOA #69-01. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye� the motion carried unanimously,
Bill Shaw, 5212 Capitol Street N.E.: He aeked what denaity ie allawed
in P.D. development. (No deneity hae been established.) He asked if it ie
common practice for the zoning co�iaeion to coneider rezaning without having
proposed plans.
r
Planninst Carmission MeetinQ - Januaxv 30 1969 p8�e 7
Chaixman Erickson eaid that rezoning can be acted on without any plana,
but the plans come laCer and can be turned down.
Mr. Shaw said he wondered if it would not be wise to have aomething down
before P.D: is considered. There is nothing binding to what they pre�ent.
Chairman Ericksan answered that there is nothing binding on either the
City or petitioner. He then asked if it is the general feeling that Che
major problems are deneity and traffic.
A citizen said there would etill be a fair amount of objections -- lack
of buffer and subsequent effect of property values. A lot of the people who
moved to the suburbs did so to get away from congeation and traffic. He did
agree the primary objection of many is that of safety relative to traffic.
The sudience were informed by the Chairman that the petitioner would have
to present a plan agreeable to the Planning Comiisaion and City Councj.l and
would require a public hearing the same ae the one held for rezoning.
Willard Unke, 1422 Trollhagen Drive: I think Pemtom has an outstanding
reputation. They don't build little houses on hillsides. He asked the Plan-
ning Co�iasion: 1) Do you people feel that you can exercise proper control
if it ie rezoned to P.D. 2) Hw long do you expect to consider this petition?
3) Is it poeaible that you can go ahead with your plana by Lowering the
danaity?
Chaixman Erickson said in answer to 1) I think the denaity can he con-
trolled. 2) He, persanally, -�as not ready to act on the rezoning requeet
tonight, but haw many meetings it would take, he did not know.
Mr. Engstrom said in anewer to Item 3, they have proposed 6.5 per acre,
which we feel is moderate, and that the terrain would prohibit aingle
unattached dwellings, and if developed, could not be done without damaging
the natural amenities of the site. We are not intereated in going in there
on s single family subdivision. We are not interested in going in and ruining
that piece of Land. Let me tell you we do not go in and sell the Plac�ning
Co�ieaion and Council a layout and a schedule and then come back with another
thing. We don't do that. We would layout a schedule and we do not deviate
Erom that. The density under R-3 is coneiderably higher than what we are
aeking for. We have to preaent to the Plaiming Co�ission and Council the
densities and a sketch,
Mr. Polzak said that when Acres, Inc, bought that property, it was
asaumed that the same kind of development would be built acsoea the road. He
thought it would be in the interest of the City of Fridley that it remain in
R-1 zoning,
A citizen added that they would like a nice reaidential area over there
which they could be proud of. She ob.jected to P.D. She eald she wae not
queationing their integrity, but suppose they etarted on apartment bu�ldings
and got all of them built in five years, and then what could happen -- they
might sell the rest of the land.
V Plannina Co�iesion Me�tina - Januarv 30. 1969 Faae 8
Mr. Jenaen said he would like to clear up one point. The comment about
480 homes in that area, he thought was really an error in judgment becauae
thie would be somewhaC in exceae of our mini�am atandards under the ordinance
now.
Mr. Mellum: Do you have any P.D. in Fridley right now? Spring Brook Park
apparently has flopped according to the Fridley Sun. I sat in the laet meet-
ing and a very eimilar plan was developed. Thia plan was turned flatly down
by the Planning Co�ission. We have a nev Planning Co�iseion and new Chairman.
They come in with a similar plan, yet we reconsider. There may be a change of
thought with a change of inembera on the Cormnisaion. There ie no continuity
as auch. Thie P.D., as I see it, can go with the wind. I doubt very much if
I would buy property abutting Planned Develop�nt.
The Chairman said that under R-3 zoning, the ordinance establiahed a
denaity and there is not much that can be done about it.
Mr. Myhra said the Planning Co�ission has been erroneouely attacked
about Spring Brook Park. I don't think anyone deliberately did this. I came
on when it first came up. I saw plans in the very begitming. There wae no ,
townhouse. So�one said townhousea were planned. It wae not true ae far ae
the Planning Conmieaion was concemed. A number of hearinge were he�d and
peop2e were in agreement. Someone bought a home and felt he had been atung.
It is important, when thie sort of thing happens, that the Plaxming C�isaion
doea not put itself in the poeition to being the acapegoat and there ie a
corresponding responsibility on the part of the public.
Leeter G. Gable, 1434 Trollhagen Drive: Part of your coneideration ia
taxea that may generate from a particular plot of ground. I'd like to find
out what the capital investment would be with a development like this and
what it will be with 320 to 350 single family develop�nt.
Mr. Thomson quoted the figures given him by Columbia Heighta Schools
pertaining to schools which showed the plana sa propoaed would be a benefit
to the co�unity.
Mr. Bergman etated that quite a bit of time has been apent on denaities.
He asked what the noxmal density ia for R-1. Mr. Jeneen answered that it all
relates to the ordinance and the maximimm in Fridley vould be approximately 3,
and in an area of rugged terrain, it would be coneiderably lawer than that,
poesibly lower than 2.
Mr. Bergmn esid that co�enta vere made about the deeirability of
eomething like this rather than houaee on the side of a hill. When Acree, Inc.
bought that land, they were not going to build little housee on the hill.
High cost homea ehould be built in that land to come out on top, posaibly
the same deneity count be accomplished ar in Innebruck. The ereae in North
Oalce -- denaity is low, high priced houses, entire area ie beautiful. He
thought 130 acres could be developed as in North Oaks and would be a besutiful
xesidential area and would not be economically unfeasible.
Mra. Bokavich added that Fridley ia filled up with residential.
Mr. Thomson said he thought that all the people were cancerned about
txaffic. His concern ia what happena to thia piece of land. We are a young
" Plannintt Commission Meeting - Januaxv 30, 1969 PaRe 9
company and we want to be around for awhile. We think we have come up with
a decision of 6.5 and would preaerve the nature of the area and he did not
think the people will Lose anything.
Mrs. Pettersen (speaking o£ Regis Trail) eaid there ie no actual road
between Regis Trail and proposed Matterhom prive. She asked why would not
they just take 150 feet ahd go right stYSight through. When they moved out
there, they said it would be a dead end etreet. _
Mr. Bergman concluded that a year ago they came down to diacuss ths ,
rezoning change. Petitions were presented with 167 signatur,ee. A year later,
tonight, we are dawn here and we have presented petitiona wliich'totslled 2Q3
names. This is an indication that the people in the property:i�eat o£ the
proposed zoning like this less and less. Mr. Bergman asked that they take
action tonight.
Mr. Polzak: I am against the rezoning.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhxa, that the Planning Co�ission
close the public hearing of the rezoning request, ZOA #59-01, Pemtom, Inc.
of that part of the SE�y of Section 24 that lies North of Hwy. �k100 right of
way to be rezoned from R-1, single family dwelling diatrict, to Planned
Development. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion earried unanimously.
Chairman Erickson said that he thought it was only fair to both sidee of
the question that the Plarming Coammission continue a atudy of the inEoxmation
given tonight.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Co�niasion
continue the rezoning request, ZOA �F69-Oi, Pemtom, Inc. to February 27, 1969
for further study. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
3. REZONING RE9UEST: ZOA #69-02, GEORGE M, NELSON: N� of Lot j0, N� of Lot
31, Auditor's Subdivision /�f129. Rezone from R-1 to R-jA.
Confirm public hearin� date of February 13, 1969.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, aeconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission
confirm the public hearing date of February 13, 1g69 for ZOA #69-02, George
Nelson of the N� of Lot 30, N� of Lot 31, Auditor's Subdiviaion #129 to be
rezoned £rom R-1 to R-3A and that the hearing be held at 7:30 P.M. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
4. �ONING UEST: ZOA 68-11 LOUIS MOMCHILOVICH: West 47 feet of the
South 120 feet of Lot �0, Auditor's Subdivision %7. Rezone from R-1 to R-jA.
Confirm public hearing date of February 13, �969•
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning� Commission
confirm the'public hearing� date o£ February 13, 1969 for ZOA #68-11, Louis
Monchilovich o£ the Weet 47 feet of the South 120 feet o£ Lot 10, Auditor's
Subdiviaion #7�, to be rezoned from R-1 to R-3A and that the hearing be held
at 8:00 P.M. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
a `
5
Plannintt Co�i.saion Meetint� - January 30, 1969 __ _�.__ PaAe 10
xear 43i•b ieet of' Lot 35, rear 401.
Subdivision #77.
` Confirm public hearing 3ate of February 13, �969•
6.
�
a
MOTION by Myhra, aeconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planni� Commisaion
confirm the public hearing date of February 13, 1969 for the proposPd
preliminary plat, Brentwood Estates, Thomas R. Swanson,o£ the rear 431.6 feet
o£ Lot 35, rear 401.9 feet of Lot 33, Revieed Auditor's Subdiviaion #7'] and
that the hearing be held at 8:30 P.M. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
the motion carried unanimously.
It was explained by the Engineering Assistant that the City hae
secured eseements for new alignment from Taco Towne International, Inc. and
Target, and the deede have been recorded. In order to get the loopback, the
City of Fridley would vacate a portion of the service road, and Taco Tovm� �
would dedicate the alignment as ahown on drawing dated 12�2j�68 b,=�t11y�r.iTo
Glende on pag�e 3'j of the agenda.
MOTION by Jenaen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commission
recommend the vacation (sav #69-01) of the service road at Highway #65� South
of 'jjrd Avenue and that the City re�ain the utility rights. Upon a voice vote,
sll voting aye, the motion carried unanino,zaly.
7. MINNESOTA STATE AID MILEAGE DFSIGNATION:
The F�ineering Assistant explained that the Plats & Subdiviaione-Streeta
& IItilitiee Subcommittee i'elt some co.naideration should be given to the
aervice drive along T.H. #47 se it goea psat the Anoka County Ice Arena. and
industrial area to the North. It ia imposaible, at this point to aek for
S+.ate Aid F1�nde 'ecause the construc+,ion plans muat be approved by the state
prior to letting. The members etudied mapa of the area prepered by the
Engineering Depsrtment indicating deleted,, propoeed and present State and
County roads.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, eeco.nded by Myhra, that the Planning Commiaeion
concur with the memo to the Plata & Subdivieiona-Streete & Utilitiea
Subco�ittee dated January 15, 1969 and recommend that Minnesota State Aid
Streete No. j23, No. 306 and the portion of No. j16 between IIniveraity Avenue
and ']th Street, and the portion oY No. 320 between IInivereity Avenue and
5th Street be removed from the eyetem, and that the fallowing reco�endation
be £or new Mi.nnesota State Aid Streete: (1� Alden Way, 75th Way, 79th Way
combinatio.n; (2� Rice Creek Terrace and Mo.nroe Street combination with the
following slternatee: (a� Highway #47 Eaet Service Drive (69th Avenue to
'j3rd Ave.nue�; (b� 52.nd, Buchanen, 53rd Avenue and Matterhorn Drive
combination. IIpo.n a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
8. STREET STQDy; 73 AVENQE VACATION•
The Engin,.ering Aasiatant reviewed the background o£ thie item eayin.�
that the City hae a need for more right of way on 73rd Avenue. The membe:t
wondered i£ it would be poaeible to trade land at the North for the right i
of way and diapenae with co.ndemnation and no exchange of money. The '
Planning Commieaion eent the vacation study back to the Plate & Subdivisione-
!
)
Y+
Plannina Coffiiasion Meetinrt - Januarv 30 1969 Pa¢e 1L �
Streete & IItilities Suboommittee. They felt the City could not initiate the
vacation because af the ow.nerehip problem on-either eide of 73� Avenue. The
trading would have to be done now becauee o£ the etreet improvement
project ie acheduled for 1969. The motion of the eubcommittee indicated that
if the 140 foot wide etrip of land to the North of Central View, which wouid
be hard to develop by itself, were combined vrith Block 1, Central View, tvo
building aites could be created. One, a five acre commercial eite with
accees to a aervice drive along Highway #65, the other, a five acre induetriel
site with access to Central Avenue and that all of Block 2 cauld develop,
as is, with frontage along 73rd Avenue.
They recalled that Mr. Sorenson did not want 73� Avenue vacated, and
Mr. Thoe had no objection but he had a problem with the storage tanka.
Mr. Jeneen said that you ce.nnot aesume anything about the aize or ehape
o£ the future development of a commercial or induetrial tract. The only thing
the Subcommittee could do logically was to recommend that the atreet could
not be closed snd atate that they felt they would recommend £a,vorable
coneideration of an alternate scheme allowing the cloaing o£ 73� Avenue
upon the request of the individuals to vacete and with the acquisition of
a eervice drive from 73rd Avenue to Fireside Drive along Highway �{fi5 so that
all propertiea could be properly served by the etreet.
MOTION by Jeneen, seconded by Mittelatadt, that the Planning� Commiesion
recommend to Council that, while the vacation o£ 73�- Avenue ia probably a
deairable action, it cannot be recommended becauee abutting property owners
are not in agxeement and vacation would deprive aome owners of etreet
access to their propertiea. If at a future date abutting property ownera
favor thia vacation propoeal, a aervice drive should be coneidered along
T.H. #65 from 73rd Avenue to Fireside Drive. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, the motion carried unanimously.
The Commiseion were given a large acale map of the area prepared by
the Engineering Department. They felt theee were a definite help to them
in eeeing the eituation more cle8rly and auggested they be available to
the Council.
9. F�YCAVATION ORDINANCE:
The City Nlanager was asked what concern the Planning Commiasio.n
ahould coneider. He said the problem is the condition of the atreet a£ter
an excavatio.n. Such thinge ae improper backfilling or compaction which
would not neceesarily ehow up right away, need attention.
Mr. Fitzpatrick asked how much of a eafety factor are we dealing with
here and if we are to provide a eafe operation, it aeemed to him it could
be done in many other ways, such ae individual's reaponsibility, or by
ordinance.
The purpose o£ the ordinance wae discuseed. One o£ the iteme
diecueaed was the poeting of a aurety bond. The Commiaeion felt thie would
be unfair to the pereon doing a very amall piece o£ excavation and thie
feeling included the paragraph on in�urance. They also said that any
. . . . . . - i�....._..
�y .
i� . � � . .. � .
Planning Co�ission Meeting - Januarv 30 1969 YaQe 12_
excavation ordinance should be written so that the City would not be '
responsible for damages which might occur because of faulty excavation
procedure by some other excavator.
The Commission felt they would recommend that the ordinance be redrawn.
The possible violations were discussed.
ADJOIIRNMIIVT:
Chairman Erickson adjourned the meeting at �2:45 P.M.
Respect£ully submitted,
�
� _� , //� � � i��-ti�
J-7��-
HAZEL 0'BRIAN _
Recording Secretary
_ _ _.
�+
:
- �,� ��.
. ��:
�-�' � O
i
, J vI
� MIQLe41iID
To William E. Jensen
Homer Ankrum
Gentlemen:
C�IOP�6�/A'PIV��, /ncorporated
January 31, 1969
For some time we have been aware of the "Proposed Revised Sign Ordinance".
A copy of the proposed ordinance, which we have discussed in Fridley Chamber
of Commerce Board meetings, has been up for conversation but not for criti-
cal evaluation. A copy of the ordinance which we got from the Chamber
office is dated June 25 and even though vae had the impression there had been
certa.in revisions in this copy transmitted by Mr. Qureshi, there may be a
more up to date version of this instrument than I have been able to procure
through channels listed above.
The main point of this memorandum is to identify without going into detail
that we at Midland are concerned about the following:
SECTION 2- Section C- in definitions found at the top of page 2
SECTION 3- Sub. Se�: G- roof signs on page 5
' P- Motion signs - page 7
S- Address sign - page 7
X- Signs attached to a building wall - page 8
Z-A wall sign - page 8
AA Maintenance
(1) All on page 8
SECTION 4- Snb. Sec, A: Maximum Height - page 9
SECTION 5- Sub. Sec. D, (2) Free standing signs (a) bottom of page 12
F. (4) Maximum Height of Free-Standing Signs -
. page 14
SECTION 6- Sub.Sec. A. (3) page 15 .
B. (1} and (2) - page 16
C. Licenses and bonds - page 17
MAIN OFFICE, 739 JOHNSON STREET N. E., MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55413, TELEPHONE (612) 331-6030
�
.�°
�
i
��:_ .
William E, Jensen, Homer Anlcrum - page 2- January 31, 1969
SECTION 7- Si:b. Sec. B(2} - page 18
These are all topical materials that we at Midland have identified concerns
about at the moment. Our advertising manager has been out of town and
will study this over the weekend and we may have some additional items we
may want to address ourselves to when he gets back and gives his report
on Monday next week. According to informatio�i, we have,this sign ordinance
will be up for its second reading at the Gouncil meeting Monday night,
February 3. I understand one of our business representatives in Fridley
has asked for 45 minutes to an hour with the Council to discuss various
portions of this ordinance to which he is taking exception.. I would like to
persotiall� request, us a represe, ±ative £rom Midlar,d, that fu: the: hearinge
on this ordinance be conducted until a number of the principal business
concerns have had an opportunity to get rnore familiar with some of the
limitations that exist in the proposed ordinance above.
GWT:nh
cc Mr. H. Stoehr
Mr. L, Torrey
Sincerely,
��
� . ���� �
.
Glenn W. Thompson, Director
Membership and Public Relations
r
:�
` MINUTES OF T�E REGULAR PARKS AND RECREATION COhHdI5SI0N MEETING JANUARY 27, 1969
Meeting was called to order by Chairman Fitzpatrick at 7:52 P.M.
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fitzpatrick, Cochran, Blair, Stimmler (arrived at 9:00)
MEMBERS ABSENT: Donlin
OTHERS PRESENT: None
MIWUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 16, 1968
On page 2, under the heading RESOLUTION, the following motion should be
added:
MOTION by Cochran, seconded by Stimmler, to receive the draft resolution
and take it under advisement at the next meeting. The Motion Carried.
MOTION by Cochran, seconded by Blair, that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting
of December 16, 1968 be accepted as corrected. The Motion Carried.
RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS
The Commission is interested in the gossibility of obtaining matching funds
or aid from the County in the development of Riverview Park. Chairman Fitz-
patrick and Vice Chairman Cochran agreed to contact Mr. A1 Kordiak and have
him express any interest that the County may have in this project. Both Mr.
Kordiak and Mr. Harvey Peterson, County Commissioner, are scheduled to attend
the February meeting.
WEST MOORE LAKE
Mr. Robert Minder, a member of the Rotary Club, had previously planned to
attend the meeting but was unable to due to illness. The next step in this
project is to find out what the Rotary Club plans in regard to the development
of West Moore Lake and perhaps show them the preliminary plan that was drawn
by the Park Consultant.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Regarding the January Memorandum, under Old Business Items, the Gommission
felt that item "g", Park Acreage Study, should be marked completed. Member
Blair suggested that the Commission offer its help to the Jaycees in organizing
item "h", Junior Olympics Program. Chairman Fitzpatrick reported on item "k",
School Board Meeting of Dec�ber, 1968, which the Director and he attended.
The School Board feels that more supervision is needed in the activities which
utilize schools facilities.
MOTION by Cochran, seconded by Blair, that the December and January Memorandums
and the December and January Progxess Reports be accepted. The Motion Carried.
PROGRAM FOR PARKS AND RECREATION COhfi�fISSION ACTIVITIES
The Commission reviewed and updated the Program for Parks and Recreatiqn Com-
"; mission Activities for 1969. A few changes were made. The Commission felt
that it would be more beneficial to them to review the 1968 Summer Program
at the same time that the 1969 Summer Program is adopted and the same with
the Winter Programs. They also requested that the Department contact the
Park Consultant to see if an arrangement.can be made by which the Park Consul-
tant attend a minimum of four meetings to be scheduled according to the Com-
mission's need for his services.
y MINUTES OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION, JANUARY 27, 1969 PqGE 2
MOTION by Blair, seconded by Cochran, that the Program for Parks and Recreation
Commission Activities for period from January to December of 1969 be approved.
The Motion Carried.
MONTHLY MEETINGS
MOTION by Stimmler, seconded by Blair, to continue holding Lhe Regular Parks
and Recreation Commission Meetings on every fourth Monday of each month at
7:30 P.M. The Motion Carried.
ELECTION OF OFFSCERS
Thomas Cochran was nominated by Gary Stimmler for Vice Chairman.
MOTION by Blair to close nominations. The Motion Carried.
MOTION by Blair, seconded by Stimmler, that Mr. Thomas Cochran serve as Vice
Chairman to the Parks and Recreation Commission for the year of 1969. The
Motion Carried.
MOTION by Stimmler, seconded by Cochran, that Mary Lou Erickson serve as
Secretary to the Parks and Recreation Commission for the year of 1969. The
Motion Carried.
PLAN FOR 1970
The Chairman received a call from a citizen requesting more activities for
young girls through the Summer months. The Commission suggested that possibly
a drill team or baton lessons could be offered but wished to check further with
the Director as to the available activities.
Member Blair suggested exploring the possibility of the Department offering
Boy's Basketball on Saturdays. Again the Commission requested that the Director
look into this.
Under the section, Park Development, the following additions were discussed
by the Commission:
The Commons: Members Blair and Stimmler stated that there is a great
need for an additional hockey warming house.
Locke Park: Vice Chairman Cochran pointed out to the Commission that a
South entrance in addition to the planned North entrance would be a great
asset to the park.
Broad and Hugo Park Property and Glencoe Park Property: Since these two
parks are located so close together, the Commission felt that perhaps just
one should be developed at this time. They will study this further.
Under the section, Land Acquisition Site Proposals, item 4, West, the Commission
wished to add the area'South of Locke Lake and East of the railroad tracks for
further consideration.
The Commission agreed that another area for their consideration, section D,
should be the restoration of both sides of Moore Lake. This could possibly
be just a study at this time.
MOTION by Cochran, secnnded by Stimmler, to accepi the Plan for 1970 with the
comments and changes as noted. The Motion Carried.
�� MINUTES OF PARKS AND RECREATION COh9AISSION, JANUARY 27, 1969 PAGE 3
ORDINANCE BOOK
Mr. Stimmler was appointed by the Chairman to read through the Minneapolis Park
Board Ordinance Book and advise the Director which ordinances would benefit the
Fridley Park System if adopted. The Commission will again discuss this at their
February Meeting.
PARKS RESOLUTION 1-1969
The draft resolution regarding encroachments on park property was reviewed,
revised and adopted by the Commission. See Attachment.
MOTION
ADJOURNMENT
immler, that the revised resolution be
ril Tha Mnfinn f'�rriuA
The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 P.M.
The next regular meeting wiil be held on Monday, February 24, 1969 at 7:30 P.M.
in the Conference Room of the Civic Center.
Respectfully submitted,
� l
��� t�� ������.;
Mary L Erickson, Secretary to the Commission
.: '"
PARKS RESOLUTION N0. 1-1969
A RESOLUTION ADOPTED JANUARY 27, 1969 BY FRIDLEY PARKS AND
RECREATION COR4dISSION TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PRIDLEY,
MINNESOTA
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows:
WHEREAS, the land area of the Fridley parks system has lost 1.57 acres
to the Water Department over the past eight years, as detailed below; and
WHEREAS, the park system here has lost 1.50 acres of park land to the
necessary construction of a traffic way at 69th Avenue at Locke Park; and
WHEREAS, the park system can continue to expect this nibbling attrition
and loss of park lands; and
WHEREAS, the Comstock and Davis "Supplement to Preliminary Report on
Water Utility, Fridley, Minn." of October, 1968, on Page 2, Paragraph 3,
states in discussing new well locations, "Possibly one of the greatest prob-
lems will be site cost and site availability". We respectfully submit that
park lands are not "free". They are taken at the expense of park users; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley plans to undertake a well drilling program
commencing December, 1968 which should see, at maximum, as many as six wells
with pump houses and other facilities constructed at sites,
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Fridley Parks and Recreation Commission
that the City of Fridley be requested to replace park area lost to well site
development on a"when done" and "as done" basis. Be it further resolved
that the City of Fridley be requested at the earliest possible time, to
arrange to replace the 1.57 acres already lost by our park system to the
water system, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council adopt a policy establishing
conditions under which park property may be used for non-recreational pur-
poses.
:
, i
,
�: t�, �`*x- ���.�
"i2;lt wy�E aj_,�rt ;,�'�
`e�
' STATE OF MINNESO7A
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
J59 BOARD OF HEALTH BUILDING -
� . UNIVERSITY CAMPUS
MINMEAPOLIS
55440
January 24> 1969
Fridley City Council
c/o Mr. Maxvin Brunsell, Clerk
City Hall
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Gentlemen:
The discharge of untreated indust^ial wastes into Rice Creek by
Designware Industries, Inc., canncL ccnLinue.
We would 2ike to propose a meeting on Thursd�y, February 13, 1969,
at 1:30 p.m. between Designware, Inc.; Fridley; North Suburban Sanitary
Sewer Distriot and the sLaff eS the �gencp to discuss the discharge of
these wastes.
Please let us fmow if the time is not satisfactory. Your cooperation
will be appreciated. If you have ar�y questions, please let us lmow.
GRi(/I�II,:ms
Yours very tru�y,
li�' "
^ rge R. Koonce, Acting Chief
ection o£ Industrial & Other Wastes
�G
�
F2
�
}�;;
, `.°-`:;`' ;
8. C. SMILEY � ASSOCIATE S ARCHITECT$ AIA -•!
, " �=,_. ;
1 lOtl LASALLE AVENUE •
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55003 • (612) 332•1t01 '�"� '
To: D. M. xoyes Construction Company CHANGE ORDER N0. G--S
430 Oak Grove Date : January 15� 1969
Minneapolis� Minnesota 554�3 Comm No.: 6013
Coniractor for: General Construction
At: Fridley Civic Center� Fridley, Minnesota
Owner: City of Fridley
Contract dated: November 2� 196b
You ore hereby instructed, subject to provisions of the obove mentioned contract, to maka the fol-
lowing modifications therein:
Deduct rough grading work and exterior concrete work to
the extent indicated in D.M. Noyes Construction Co.� Inc,
letter of March 1, 1968 to City of Fridley.
Amount of Original Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5282�600.00
/4nount of Previously Amended Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5287� 653.21
T�is Change Order No. G^5 ,, Deduct, ,,,, j 1�000.00
pcesent Amended Controct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1286� 653.21
S. C:'Sn)iley & Associates, Architects_�
�,�lr,. �� �1�.- '`�; ��,f�� t��
Mas Matsumoto Owner
,
Firm D• M. N�ies C nstruction Co, Inq�ccepfed
i7 Br
� Accepted
By ll�� . � By -
Date �/G s/� " Dare
'
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY OF FRIDLEY
February 3, 1969
Honorable Mayor and City Councll
c/o Homer R. Ankrum, City Manager
City o$ Fridley
6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Re: Bids on Rear Mounted Truck Crane Opened
on January 27, 1969 at 12:00 o'clock Noon
The following are the bids submitted for the above mentioned truck
crane by these two cocq�aniea:
Bidder
Arrow Equipment Company
5600 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolia, Minneaota
Chsrles Olson & Sons, Inc.
2945 Pillsbury Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Cash Price
$3,263.75
$3,454.00
Delivery Date
14 Cal. Days
45 Cal. Days
I reco�eend that the City purchase the Hiab rear mounted truck
crane, Model 293, with a rated capacity of 3,300 pounds and with a fif-
teen foot boom, from the Arrow Equipment Compsny. It ia all hydrauli-
cally operated with dual controls on each side of the truck. This
model also has some safety factors that I believe are essential to the
men who will be using the equipment.
�k�C.✓1 � C�:,� �-t.�C�-a..l.��J
LESTER E. CHESNEY
Director of Public Works
LEC:ik
�i�
� PUBLIC WuRKS DEPARTMEi1T �`5
CITY OF FRIDLEY
' I
BIDS FOR ONE NEW REAR MOUNTED TRUCK CRAIVE ,
BIDS OPENED ON JANUARY 27. 1969 AT 12:00 NOON
�rrow Equipment Co.
600 Wayzata Blvd.
inneapolis, Minn.
rlaon Equipment Co.
30 W County Road "C"
. Paul, Minn.
Csanco Materiel Handling
Equipment Co.
7I6 North Dunlap
ive State Equipment Co.
910 W County Road ^C"
.0. Box 8047
Hall Equipment, Iac.
#100 & Cedar Lake Road
nneapolis, Mian.
�J & B Equipment Co.
7728 Morgan Avenue So.
�tfianeapolis, Minn.
■
_`
MacQueen Equipment Co.
�229 University Avenue S.E.
inneapolis, Minn.
– _—__
�tinneapolia Equipment Co.
520 - 2nd Street S.E.
rMinneapolis, Minn.
National Iron Company
�285 County Road "H"
New Brighton, Hinn.
'Gharlan Olson & Sona, Inc.
2945 Yillsbuzy Avenue
.�Minneapolis, Minn.
'
5% Bid Bond
Fireman's Ina. Co. $3,263.75 14 Cat. Days
San Franciaco, Calif
ertified Check for
$I90.00 $3,454.00 . 45 Cal. Daya
.W. National Bank
,
'
'
LICF]iSES TO AE A?PROVBD AT T?E FB9RU4RY � 1969 COUNCIL t�E&TING
, CIGARETTE
' NSW Colonial Hause
6215 University Ave.
Fridley, Minnesota
' GENBRAL CONT&1CTOR
� Schwierger Construction
6900 117th Avenue North
Oaeeo, Minnesota
,
'
r
� .
�
r
�
�
�
�
�
�
BY
Paul A. Baqy
APPROVED BY
Chief of Polics
By: Roscoe Schwierger NEW
,
Building Inspector
�F
ESTIMATES TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 3, 1968
D. M. Noyes Construction Company
General Contractors
100 West Franklin Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Fridley Cioic Center (FINAL) dated January 17, 1969
$ 6,000.00
6rv
'
'
1
'
IJ
€;�,
CERTIFI�A7E OWNER ❑
ARCHITECT ❑
FOR PAYMENT coNranc-roR ❑
fIELD
AIA DOGUMENT G703 OTHER F I N A L
PRO)ECT: Fridley Civic Center
(�ame, address) 6431 UniveY'Si.ty Ave N.E.
Fridley, Mi.nnesota
TO (Owner)
�
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota
� ARCHITECT'S PROIECT NO: 6013
CONTRACTfOR: General Construction
, L J CONTRACT DATE: November 2, 1966
In accordance with this Contract and the attached Appiication For Payment the Contractor is entiNed to payment in the
amount stipulated below. 7he present status of the account for this Contrect is as follows:
'
'
'
'
'
ADDITIONS $
Change Orders approved
in��previous months by
Owner— TOTAL
Subsequent Change Orders
Number Aooroved
G-1 5/1/67 2,269.00
G-2 /25/67 1,042.00
G-3 /25/67 3,404.00
G-4
G-5
TOTALS I
Net change by Change Orders
S
By:
DEDUCTIONS S ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ..$ 600. 00
CHANGE ORDERS
TOTAL ADDITIONS . . . $ 6, 715.00
SUB TOTAL . . . . . , $ 289, 315.00
TOTAI DEDUCTIONS . .$ 2.661.79
CONTRACT SUM TO DATE ..$ 2a6, 653. 21
BAIANCE TO F4NISH . . $ O .00
TOTAL COMPLETED 70 DATE g 286, 653.21
MATERIALS STORED . . .5 0
TOTAL COMPLETED & STOAED $ 286� 653. 21
1, 661. 79 RETAINAGE �_qo 0.00
lr 000. 00 T07AL EARNED LESS
RETAINAGF . . . . . , $ 286, 653. 21
LESS PREVIOUS
CERTIFICATES . . . .; 280, 653. 21
THIS CERTIFICATE ...,,$ S 6r OOO.00
S 4.053.21
& Associates
� oace: January 17, 1969
This Certificate is not negotiable. It is payable only to the payee named herein and its issuance, payment and acceptance are without
pre}udice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor under their Contract. lf AIA DOCUMENT G702 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT, or other
applica[ion form mntaining satis(actory evidence of paymen[ for Work previously completed DOES NOT ACCOMPANY THIS CERTIFICATE,
the Contractor shall first provide the equivalent cer[ification by completing and ezecuting the following:
State of:
County of:
The. underzigrted certifies that the Work covered by [fiis Certificate ?er
Payment has been completed in aaordance with the Contrac[ Documents,
that all amounts have been paid ior Work for which previous Certificates
for Payment were issued and payments received, and that the curren[ payment
shown� herein is now dua �
Contracror.
CERTIFICATE NO:
Clate:
Subscribed'and swom ro before me this
day of
Notary Pu61ic:
My Commission expires:
DATE OF ISSUANCE:
AtA DOGUMENT G703 • CERTIFlCATE FOR PAYMENT • SEP7EMBER 1966 EDITION • 07966 . AIAA
THE AMERIUN INSTITUTf OF ARCHITECTS,'U35 NEW YORK AVE., NW WASHINGTOM, p,C. ?0006
�9
ONE PAGE
�
��
'
'
�J
'
'
'
'
�J
'
'
'
'
1
�J
,
,
C L A I M S
GENERAL
LIQUOR
0
17221 through 17335
2973 through 3010
�9
City of
OFFICE OF CI7Y COORDINATOR
.315 CITY XAII 330�2032
MINNEIIPOLI4. MIHNESOTA 55/15
Mr. Homer Ankrum
City Manager, Fridley
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley City Hall
Minneapolis, Minn. 55421
Dear Mr. Ankrum:
Minneapolis
January 24, 1969
Minneapolis has developed an alternative to the North
Suburban Sanitary Sewer District (NSSSD) Board's plan
for providing long-term sewer aervices to north suburban
communities that has considerable economic advantages
for taxpayers of Fridley.
The City's proposal, announced January 6, 1968 at a session
of the Minnesota Pollution Control Aqency, is presently
beinq examined by the NSSSD Board and its consultants,
We feel, however, that you as a representative of the
people of Fridley, should be advised directly on the
important differences in the proposals of the NSSSD Board
and the City of Minneapolis.
In these times of financial difficulties, all municipal-
ities, large and small, must do whatever they can to solve
their problems with a minimum of expenditure.
At the same time, we must develop solutions that have long-
range benefits, We know with our years of experience that
low-cost short-term solutions frequently are more costly in
the long run.
It is for these reasons that Minneapolis' proposal for
' solvinq north suburban sewer problems should interest
your community. We believe that you will agree with us
after conaidering all of the facts.
' If you have any questions, we will be more than happy to
i meet with you at any time or place that is convenient for
� you.
'
'
TAT:ma
.
Sincerely,
%�waso�/• %�lirl�osp.�
,'� A. THOMPS
-'•" 4�ity Coordin
�_' j� _ _ ����
�
_ ,�,��.� �...�. .. . _
�0