08/18/1969 - 5560,
�II
�
�
'
'
,
,
'
�
�
,
�
'
,
'
�
I
�J
,
L' T T-V�. TT�&�i �. �
COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA
7030 P.Mo— AUGUST 18, 1969
��'r��
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - AUGUST 18, 1969 - 7:30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL CALL:
PRESENTATION OF AWARD:
Youth Achievement Award; Kenneth L. Christensen, Jr
Eagle Scout
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Regular Council Meeting, August 4, 1969
Public Hearing and Workshop Meeting, August 11, 1969
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
VISITORS:
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
None
OLD BUSINESS:
1. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 402 of the
City Code
2. Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 105.01 of
the City Code
Pages 1 - 25
Pages 26 - 40
Page 41
Page 42
'
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, AUGUST 18, 1969
OLD BUSINESS (Continued)
3. Second Reading of an Ordinance Authorizing the Establishment
of Absentee Ballot Precincts.
4. Ratification of Resolution ��135-1969 Granting a Waiver of the
City Code Requirements as Pertains to Curb, Gutter, and Street
Width, Project ST. 1969-3 - Addendum �k2, By Reason of it being
a Flood Plain, and Providing for Slope Easements Which Would
Expire in one Year.
NEW BUSINESS•
5. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance for Rezoning
(ZOA �k69-09) to Rezone from R-2 to R-3A Generally Located
South of Highway ��694 Between 5th Street and 6th Street.
(Requested by Sacred Heart Parish)
6. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinan�e for Rezoning
(ZOA �k69-08A) to Rezone from R-1 to R-3A, Generally Located
South of 69th Avenue and 1,000 Feet West of the City Limits,
(Requested by Kaye W. Westerlund)
7. Consideration of First Rzading of Ordinance for Rezoning
(ZOA ��69-07) to Rezone Area Bounded on the North by 60th
Avenue, on the South by 57th Avenue Lying Between Main
Street and University Avenue.
and
Receiving Petition Requesting "Slip Off" not be Installed
at this Time. Wait for Commercial Developers To Come In.
PAGE 2
Pages 43 & 44
Page 45
Pages 46 & 47
Pages 48 & 49
Pages SO - 54
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, AUGUST 18, 1969 PAGE 3
NEW BUSINESS CONTINUED
8. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance for Vacation
(SAV �k69-03) of an Al1ey and Two Streets in Block 6, Berlin
Addition, (Requested by Great Northern Railway Company)
9. Consideration of Great Northern Final Plat and Setting
Public Hearing.
10. Request from Designware Industries for Variance from Plumbing
Code to Allow Fiberglass Pipe.
11. Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of
August 6, 1969.
12. Receiving the Minutes of the Building Standards - Design
Control Meeting of August 7, 1969
13. Receiving the Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting
of Attgust 13, 1969.
Pages 55 - S7
�
Pages 58 & S9
Pages b0 - 67
Pages 68 - 69
Page 70
REGULAR COTJNCIL MEETING, AUGUST 18, 1969
NEW BUSINESS, LONTINUEA)
14. Receiving the Minutes of the Fridley Industrial Development
Commission Meeting of August 7, 1969
15. Consideration of First Reading of Sign Ordinance
16. Consideration of Registered Land Survey, East River Road
Car Wash and Superette
�
17. Consideration of Request by June M. Ulberg to ALlow
Building Permit and I,ot Split
18. Consideration of Refund to Federal Government on
1965 Disaster.
19. Consideration of Lease for Municipal Court Room in
Civic Center
PAG� 4
Page 71
Pages 72 - 87
Pages 88 - 90
Pages 91 & 92
�
Pages 93 - 98
REGUTAR COUNCIL MEETING, AUGUST 18, 1969 PAGE 5
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
20, Consideration of Establishing an Investment Fund.
21. Consideration of Resolution Ordering Improvement Plans
and Specifications, ST. 1970-4
22. Consideration of Resolution Ordering Improvement Plans
and Specifications, ST. 1970-1, Addendum �kl
23. Consideration of Resolution Ordering Improvement Plans
and Specifications, ST. 1970-2
24. Consideration of Resolution Requesting Minnesota Highway
Department for Assistance
25. Consideration of Resolution Designating the Polling Places
and Appointing Election Judges for the September 30, 1969
Primary Election
Page 99
Pages 100 & 101
Pages 102 & 103
Pages 104 - 106
Page 107
Pages 108 & 109
REGULAR COUNCIL ?�ETING, AUGUST 18, 1969 PAGE 6
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
26, 1Kemo from Finance Director - Final Assessment Roll ST. 1968-1B
and ST. 1968-2B Street Projects.
27. Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed
Assessment Roll for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1968-LB
28. Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for
Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1968-1B
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
�
29. Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed V' Page 113
Assessment Roll for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1968-2B
,.
30. Resolution Directing Preparation of Assessment Roll for ',.
Street Improvement Project No, ST. 1968-2B
31. Memo from Finance Director - Final Assessment Roll,
1969 Service Connections
Page 114
Page 115
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, AUGUST 18, 1969 PAGE 7
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
32. Resolution Directing Preparation of Final Assessment Ro11 �
for Improvement Project 1969 Service Connections
Page 116
33. Resolution Directing Publication of Hearing on Proposed Page 117
Assessment Roll for 1969 Service Connections
\._.
34. Receiving Supplement to Preliminary Report on Water
Utility Dated August, 1969
35. Appointments: Police Pension Committee Appointments Page 118
36. Consideration of the City of Fridley Budget for the
Year 1970
37. Claims
Page 119
�
REGULAR COUNCIL ?KEETING, AUGUST 18, 1969 PAGE 8
NEW BUSINESS �CONTINUED)
3$. Petition: Open and G�'ade Alley $etween Main and Second
Street from 4560 up to and Including 4544 2nd
Street Northeast
39. Licenses
40. Council Chamber Reservation for Council Consideration
41. Estimates
42. Consideration of Zoning Ordinance
43. COMMUNICATIONS:
Page 120
Pages 121 - 128
Page 129
Psges 130 - 134
A. V.M. Nagel, Car Preus Co: Dividend - City's Workmen's Pages 1,35 � 136
Compeasation Insurance
R�GULAR�CQUNCIL MEETING, AUGUST 19, 1969 PAGE 9
_--...--,��
�W BUSINESS (CONTINUEA)
Communications (Continued)
B. Gary and Antonia Hedman:
C. Mounds View:
ADJOURN:
Opposing Storm Sewer in their
Area - ST. 1970-1
Thank you for help during water
emergency
Page 137
Page 138
'
u
�
'
'
�
'
�
'
'
'
�
TFiE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNICL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969
Mayor Kirkham called the Regular Council Meeting of August 4, 1969 to order at
7;40 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Kirkham lead the Council and audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Liebl, Kirkham, Samuelson, Sheridan
MEMBERS ABSENT: Harris
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 21, 1969:
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt the Minutes of the Regular Council Meetinq
of July 21, 1969 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Mayor Kirkham said that there was an additional appointment to add under this
item, which is a salary negotiating committee for the Police Department. He
said that he and Councilman Samuelson would be willing to serve. There are
also the additions of:
I. under Communications: Lester E. Eckhardt, Canplaint on weed charqes.
�26. Receiving the City Manager's report on off-sale liquor.
#27. Establishing retirement rate for Firefighters.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt the Agenda as amended. Seconded by Council-
man Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the �
motion carried.
' VISITORS:
' •
'
'
'
'
1
Mr. Carl Zuk,.281 Rice Creek Terrace
Mr. Zuk said that he had received a letter fzaa Mr. Herrick, City Attorney,
datecl July 31,1969, saying that his fence would have to come down in two weeks.
He said that he put up his fence a.bout a month ago, the Buildinq Inspection
Department had inspected it and found it to meet City Code. He then read the
letter aloud he had received fran Mr. Herrick. The letter indicates that this
is a"spite fence" and this is the grounds for which the order came �fresn the
City Council that it must come down or be reduced. He said that he had qood
reason for putting up that fence as the lot next to him is an empty lot and
is always full of weeds and there is blowing sand. He felt that he t�►anted a
degree of privacy and did not care to be looking at the weeds. None of ttie
neighbors livinq in the neiqhborhood have complained and they feel that it is
an asset. He said that he had talked to Councilman Liebl, and he Would like /
to know why this action was ordered.
i
r�' �
' r�� � � i
i
, ��r��� �;%
� y�
REGULAR COLII�T��;} C��ET�PiG OF AUGUST 4, 1969 �.�►��t 2
The City Attorney said that iie was not at the Council Meeting when this was
discussed, but that he received a call from one of the neighbors concerning
this, Mr. Zuk said that that would be the owner of the vacant lot. The City
Attorney said that the caller asked him to sign the complaint, but he told him
that he could not do that. This was discussed at the Council Meeting and
as a result he was instructed to write the letter, which is what he has done
in the capacity of City Attorney. Whether it is a spite fence or not would
have to be determined by a judge. A spite fence is one that is built because
of a disagreement with a neighbor. Mr. Zuk said that this was not true in
this case and that it was not a spite fence, but was built to improve his
property, and is in accordance with the City Code.
Mayor Kirkham told Mr. Zuk that Mr. Herrick wrote the letter in his capacity as
City Attorney. He said that it did not seem that anything could be accomplished
tonight, and suggested extending the time limit indefinately to allow for review
of the situation.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to refer this problem to the Administration and
allow ample time for Council review of the problem. Seconded by Councilman
Liebl.
Councilman Liebl said that this was discussed at a Council Meeting and Council-
man Harris suggested that the Building Inspeotion Department inspect it. The
Council did not instruct the City Attorney to take this action in writinq this
letter, and that he, personally, felt that the letter was out of line. The
City Attorney reported that he was instructed to write the letter by Council-
man Harris.
THE VOTE upon the motion, being a voice vote, all voting aye. Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried.
A gentleman in the audience said that he would like to spehk as a character
reference for Mr. Zuk. He said that he has lived in this area for about 10
years and is familiar with the problems the neighbors have with the man who
owns the vacant lot. He said that Mr. Zuk is not the kind of person who would
build,a spite fence, and agreed that it did enhance the neiqhbor�ood, and
block off the view of the weeds.
Vernon E. Bartels, 64 Rice Creek Way
Mr. Vernon Bartels reported that he recently purchased Lots 8A and 8B, Block
4 in Edgewater Gardens, and planted some white birch trees in the boulevard
area. When the finail inspection was made by the Veterans Administration, who
financed the 1oan, he was told that the tree diameter did not meet the City Code
of 2". The trees are already planted and he would like to ask that a waiver be
granted so he will not have to dig the trees up and replace them. iie said tha*
they were about 5' to 6' high and about �" in diameter. He said that if this
would be agreeabie with the Council, he would need a letter in writinq statinq
the Council's acceptance.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the letter fran Mr. Vernon E. Bartels,
64 Rice Craek Way dated July 31, 1969 and approve the requeet. Seconded by
CounciLnan Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion earried. .
1
�
�
�
,�
'
'
�
'�l
LI
'
�
�
'
u
�
'
'
L
'
�
'
C'
REGULAR vfi�?tvs::iL, N?EETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969
Leonard Lind, 1620 75th Avenue
PAGE 3
Mr. Lind said that he wanted to registex a complaint on the street that was
put in last year. There is water standing on the corner of 75th Avenue and
McKinley Street, the water flows down the street and through people's yards.
When you drive into the driveways, the cars scrape bottom.
Mayor Kirkham asked Mr. Lind to make a list of the complains and turn it in to
' the City Manager. The City Engineer pointed out that on Page 100 of the Agenda
there is a letter from the Consulting Engineers and the Contractor stating
that they are aware of the problem and that it will be taken care of.
'
'
Councilman Liebl said that this is a bad street, did not look very well, and
that the people are entitled to a good street.
PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1969-3, ADDENDUM #2 (RIVER-
VIEW HEIGHTS AREA):
' Mayor Kirkham read the Public Hearing notice aloud. The City Engineer showed
a map of the area and explained that early this spring when the flood danger
was present, a temporary dike was built along Riverview Terrace and alonq the
' creek, then down 79th Way. There was over $65,000 spent in City and Federal
money on this temporary dike. The proposal is now to lower the level of the
existing dike, and finish it off, so it will not have to be built again.
To make this dlke workable, it is proposed to put some surfacing on top of
' the dike so it can be traversed, and to keep the $and and dirt from washing
into the yards of the abutting homes. There are also soine drainaqe problems
to be taken care of so there will not be water standing behind the dike.
' On the rest of the streets the proposal is for minor grading and a blacktog
surface to give the people a minimal driving surface to avoid the mud in
the spring and after every rain. This base could be built upon later, if and
' when the permanent improvement goes in. He then showed a diagram on the
screen to explain further how the lowering of the dike and the qraduatinn
of the slope would be accomplished, and that the slope was necessary to
stabilize the dike, if it should have to be raised again sometime in the
' future. It w�ould also be necessary to relocate some utility poles etc. With
the stabilization already in place, it would be merely a matter of placing the
material and sand bags on top. As you go north the elevation of the road would
' drop, and this dirt would be used at the south end of the dike. The City has
some funds approved by the Federal government for removing the dike, and some
of this fund could be used for the partial removal of the dike.
,
'
'
�1
'
Councilman Samuelson asked if the cost of the dike work less the amount of
Federal funds is the amount that the people will be assessed. The City Engineer
said yes, except that the drainage work w�ould have to be assessed. The City
Engineer explained that the road on the dike is proposed to be 22' wide which
is below City standards, and would give a bare minimum that could still be
traversed. If there is a need for future work, such as a break in the dike,
the equi�nent would then have a surface to drive upon.
Councilman Samuelson asked if there would not be drainage into the yards. The
City Engineer said that the elimination of this problem is included in the
proposal. Councilman Samuelson asked if the slope Would be finished that
would face the yards. The City Enqineer said that it is all a question of
money and to keep the costs down black dirt will be placed on the slope and
�I
J
'
��
'
1
'
'
REGULAR C�'7YSS�dC:I�, ME.E'�'7NG OF AUGUST 4, 1969 y'-�'`�� 5
The City Manager further explained that initially the State and Federal
governments said that the money was just for removal of the dike and re-
turning it to it's previous condition. Through many discussions, the City
�inally got their agreement to allow the use of the money for improvement of
the dike rather than for hauling the dirt awaye
Mr. Rundle questioned the need for the slope easement and said that one person
on Hugo Street was asked for a 9' slope easement. He said that he would like
it left just as a dike with no improvement on top. He said that it seemed
that the Council is saying that either it is to be done the way they say, or
the dirt will be pushed into the river. He asked why not just put oil on
the streets. He said that there has not been any gravel put on the streets.
The City Manager said that he would like to bring out an important pointj
that whenever you have people living behind a dike, they are dependent upon
that dike and should there be a break, the surfacing on the dike w�ould provide
a way to get equipment and material to the break to hold back the water while
people are using other roads in the area to evacuate themselves and their
possessions. Mr. Rundle said that he agreed that the dike needed fixing and
Yte would like to see Broad Avenue improved, then this could serve the satae
purpose as Riverview Terrace.
� The City Engineer said that the City has called for bids for minimal work on
the dike. Anyone is welcome to bid. The dike work and storm sewer work will
come to about $64,000. The price of construction is very high, and keeps
' going higher. Mr. Rundle said that he thought the estimate of $65,000 is
quite low. He said that he is in the building business himself and felt that
it would cost more than that.
,
.
'
' =-
Mr. William Erickson, 650 Ely Street N.E. said that on two occa8lons he called
the City of Fridley. They responded very quickly and he got three.loads of
crushed rock in front of his house. He pointed out that whenever he has
called to ask if the streets can be graded, they are done very soon. He
pointed out that in regard to the dike, if this was not surfaced, in the sprinq
when the frost goes out, it would get very soft and muddy and if trucks had
to use it, they would tear up the sod and get stuck. He wondered if even
though the streets are bla�ktopped, if they would not get torn up as the
qround has a high water table anyhow.
' Mrs. William Watson, owner of 7965 Riverview Terrace said that Riverview
Terrace was never a dedicated street, Broad Avenue was. In 1965 it was
brouqht up about putting in Broad Avenue, now you have it in, why not leave
' Riverview Terrace alone, and close it off. She felt that with the easement
requested, there weuld be snowplowed snaw on the front porch. The City
Enqineer aaid that Riverview Terrace is a platted street the same as Broad
l�ivenue .
�
�
'
'
� member of the audience said that he lives on the sauth side of the dike, yet
he received a notice. The City Engineer said that more notices were sent out
than those that are proposed to be as�essed, so that people would know what
ie being contemplated, however, if there was no benefit, there would be no
assessment.
A member of the audience asked if left as it is, but improved, how v�ould peopl�
get to it. Mayor Kirkham said that the Council's proposal is to improve
Riverview Terrace and if done as Mr. Rundle wants, there would be people cut
off from access. Councilman Samuel$��y ���ec� �1?at as thig i� a usable and
REGULAR �O�I?��'����� t��'�:�'�3� 0�' AU�UST 4,� 1969 �,��� �
dedicated street, there would have to be 100$ for a vacation, and if one
person objected, it would involve condemnation, which is very costly. Mr.
Rundle said that those that would be cu� off could be served by a private
easement. Mr. Erickson said that he signed the getition because he thought
that the proposal wa� to close of� Rive�view Terrace and have just grass, but
now Mr. Rundle is talking about driva.ng on i� anyhow.
Councilman Sheridan said �hat �he Council wants to leave the dike in place
and give the homes in the area protection. He questioned if this is what
the people want or is the money spent to be wasted. He felt that the work
and money that has already been expended should not be thrown away, but
should be utilized and built upon•. This �w�ould require the stabilization the
City Engineer recommended and he felt that this is what shbuld be done.
Councilman Samuelson pointed out that when a vote is taken the people on the
side streets will be voting on the improvement with a gravel base with a
1�" bituminous mat and also the dike improvement. The City Engineer added
that it would also include the storm sewer work. The�e a�e loar points on the
streets, and there would be pipes put in to take the water to the river.
Mrs. Roger Holmgren, 8001 Riverview Terrace asked how much the City is pro-
posing to pay for the slope easements. Councilman Sheridan said that he
assumed nothing. Mrs. Holmgren said that this is their land. Councilman
Sheridan said, speaking for himself, he felt that as all the citizens tax
money tias gone into this work so far, he felt that the peopl� should not
be paid for qiving an easement to protect their praperty. Zf the people
want to be paid for this, he would say that the project should be abandon0cl.
Mr. Erickson pointed out that according to the 10 year street improvement
proqram, their improvements would be caning in in 1974. This, he understood,
was to elivainate the hiqh maintenance costs. Mayor Kirkham said yes, this is
the current policy and has been adopted, however, he could not answer for a
Council that wi12 exist in 1974. Mr. Erickson said that he signed the petition
against the surfacing of the streets because he felt that there was just no
base to build upon. He thought that to have a good base, the material there
now would have to be removed wliich would be very costly.
Mr. Tarnowski, 8151 Riverview Terrace said that he could not understand why
there would be a need for a 9' easement for 1' of height. Mayor Kirkham said
that this waald be used for snow storage. Mr. Rundle asked what if the people
on RivervieW Terrace are opposed to giving the slope easements, then what
would be done. The City Engineer again showed Station �2, which is the corner
of Riverview Terrace and 79th Way on the screen, and said that there were
three choices; it could be left as it sits now with the steep baAk, get
slope easements, or go through condemnations to get the slope easements. Mr.
Erickson said that the water would be way up on this house on that corner,
and he could not see why people would object to giving 15' of property to
save their homes. Councilman Samuelson felt that the people did not fully
understand what is meant by a slope easement, and explained that this would
be merely a conveyance to give the City the riqht to come onto �Che property,,
make the .unprovea►ents, establish the grade, change utility poles and do other
necessary construction work, then qet out. The City would not hold any title,
the land �rould r�nain theirs to do with as they wished, providing they did not
change the grade. The City Manager further explained that it is never known
when there may be an ice jam, or if heavy rain should come at the same time.
Had there been s lot of rain last spring, we wqt��,� ���� ���� in trouble.
�
�
'
I�
,
I�
�
C
�
�
'
'
'�
�J
'-1
�
'
,�
�
'
REGULAR �OUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969 PAGE 7
,
' The slope easement is necessary so as to make a stable base. The recannnended
slope is 4 to l, i.e, width to height to provide stability, but it has al-
ready been cut down to 3 to 1. This slope would provide the bulwark in place
should there be a need in the future to make the dike higher. It is hoped
' that the Corps of Engineers will participate in rip-rapping the riverbank
sometime in the future, but we do not expect any help from this source for
two.years.
'
�
,
Councilman Samuelson questioned whether there could be a time luait on the
slope easement. The City Engineer pointed out that they really are not giving
away any land for the slope easement, just giving the City the right to make
improvements and get out. If there was an emergency, the City would go on
their land anyhow. If wished they could be written to state a specified
time. The City Attorney pointed out that they should be so written so that
even though the slope easement expires, the grade cannot be changed.
A member of the audience said that he had signed the petition, but now feels
' that the road should go in on top of the dike. Another member of the audience
added that maybe with some sort of a dike in place, it w�ould be easier to
finance hmnes in that area.
, Councilman Sheridan asked what if all the side streets were just qravelled,
and the bituminous surfacing was just on Riverview Terrace, how much dif-
ference in cost that would make. The City Engineer replied that the cost
' would be about $55,000. The main cost is in the drainage and grading and
taking car� of the utilities.
' Mr. C.J. Anderson, 7951 Broad Avenue N.E. asked about cost figures. The
City Engineer said that it is estimated to cost $8.16 per foot, and this would
take care of the dike work, drainage, and surfacing of the side streets. This
would be about � of the cost of the normal City standard street. Mr. C.J.
' Anderson then asked how large the area was and how long the assessment would
be spread. The City Engineer said the assessment would be spread over 10
years, and showed the assessment area on the screen. Mr. Anderson asked,
' inasmuch as the main trunk sanitary sewer line to serve the entire Riverview
Heights area is located in Riverview Terrace, will not this stabilization
benefit a larget area than that proposed. The Finance Director said that in
order to assess a property, there must be a benefit proven, and he felt that
' this may be difficult to prove that they would be receiving a benefit. The
assessments for this project are upon the abutting and adjacent property
owners. Mr. Anderson asked if there was not work to be done on the sanitary
' sewer. The City Engineer said the sanitary sewer repair•work cost will come
from the utility fund and from Federal disaster funds.
'
'
'
'
Mayor Kikrham called for a vote by street, one person per household.
79th Way:
Buffalo Street:
Cheryl Street
Dover Street:
Ely Street:
Fairmont Street:
Broad Avenue:
For:
For:
For:
For:
For:
For:
For:
0
0
5
2
2
0
2
Opposed:
Opposed:
Opposed:
Opposed:
Opposed:
�PPosed:
Opposed:
4
0
0
3
1
1
0
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969 � p�Gg g
Ma�ox Kirkham then poi,nted out that th� vote on Riverview Terrace would in-
c],ude everyone who wauld benefi.t from ths dike �,n the flood plain. A
member of the audience pointed out that the people who live on higher
ground could vote away the front yards of the peopl� living on low ground.
Another member of the audience said that he lives on an i.mproved street to
the north end of the area, and has already been assessed for street, curb and
gutter. The Finance Director said that the costs were not prepared for these
people on the preliminary assessment roll, just those who would abut the
streets. More people than probably necessary were invited to attend, and the
assessment w�ould not be known until after the bid award and the assessment
roll is worked out. He said that there may be only a partial assessment for
the dike work for these people. Everyone living in=the flood plain would
have an assessment for the dike, however, these fine points have not been
worked out yet, until it is decided to go ahead with the project. There
will be another Public Hearing for the assessment roll. The Finance Director
guessed it would probably be about � the cost we are now talking about.
Mr. Erickson said that`it is the people south of Fairmont Street that really
need the dike, the people to the north may not want to vote for the dike.
The City Manager pointed out that by putting in this dike, the City is creating
sanething that could be added to. Those further north may not necessarily
be high and dry, with different weather conditions. If there would have
been a lot of rain last spring, they may have been in trouble too.
The City Attorney explained that the slope easement that the people seem so
concerned about is very similar to a drainage easement, that are present in
many peoples' back yards. The land is theirs to do with as they wish, pro-
vided they do not change the grade. They may plant grass or flowers and use
in every way as a yard. Mrs. Watson said that there were many large trees
along Riverview Terrace that she would not like to see lost. The City
Manager said that if the depth is not too great, it may be possible to ring
them and still save them. He added that as to her concern about the �now
being too close to the house, the snow could be pushed primarily toward
the river.
Mayor Kirkham asked for a show of hands of those people bordering on River-
view Terrace who would be willing to give a slope easement for a period of
one year.
For: 6 Opposed: 3
The three votes in opposition were from a man living on Ironton Street,
Mr. Rundle, 8051 Riverview Terrace, asnd Mrs. Wa�son who owns 7965 Riverview
Terrace.
Mayor Kirkham then called for a vote on the surfacing of Riverview Terrace,
and explained that everyone living inside the dike protection is entitled
to vote, one vote per household, as they will be assessed for the flike.
For: • 17 pppog�; 4
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to close the Public Hearinq on Street Improve-
ment Project St. 1969-3 Addendum #2. (Riverview Heights area). Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
�
I�
,
,
�
'
'
II�
,
'
u
'
'
,
�
� REGULAR COUN�Z� MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969
'
'
�
'
''
'
'
.
�
'
�
u
'
'
'
,
'
CJ
'
PAGE 9
DZSCUSSTON OF �XTENBION OF RIVERVIEW TERRACE BETWEEN MISSISSIPPI STREET AND
R�VER EDGE WAY AND RECEIVING PETITION #36-1969: (Requested on Agenda by
Councilman Liebl)
Mr. Ks� Fransen, 157 Riversedge Way N.E., said that since submitting the
pe�ition in the Councils' Agenda, he has �otten more signatures on the
petition. He presented new copies of the petition, and read the petltion
aloud. He said that it was felt that there are a number of unanswered ques-
tions and the people would iike to know what problems this concept would solve.
He said that the people are not against the semaphore for the Stevenson
School, that they realize that this is needed. It is felt that there are
other ways for the children to get to the school. He asked for an explanation
of the values of this concept.
The City Engineer said that as everyone knows who lives near East River Road,
it is one of the most dangerous roads in the City of Fridley. Both the
City and the County have been working on studies for traffic control. The
County has authorized a consulting engineer to study the problem from I.694
to Rice Creek. There is a proposal for a signal near the school intersection.
In 1962 there was a plan for eliminating all left hand turns except at signals
on East River Road and the County is now studying this concept. A member of
the audience asked if this wouid be the signal on Mississippi now, or a new
signal. The City Engineer said that there are plans for i.mproving this whole
intersection with additional right of way. A member of the audience said
that there are apartments all along Mississippi Way, and the original plan
was to make a cul de sac. Councilman Liebl said that there is a street to
the north that would go to the signals that would serve the apartment
buildings. The City Engineer said that another concept under study would be
for a divider.all along East River Road to eliminate all left hand turns.
Councilman Sheridan said that this would mean that cars could get onto East
River Road, but would have to exit only at signals. The City Engineer pointed
out that University Avenue has been iznproved with left turning lanes. There
is additional right of way needed for East River Road for s�e shoulders. At
present there is not enough room for the Police Department to pull a speeder
over to the side of the road without subjecting both the speeder and the
Policeman to danger. He showed the concept on the screen and explained
that this is only a planning concept, that Anoka County is studying it,
and there have been no definite detailed plans as yet.
Councilman Samuelson explained that the Council took under consideration a
large amount of dat`a supplied by the Police Department concerning the numbe�
and types of accldents on East River Road. Primarily the cause of accidents
was that people would have to stop to make a left hand turn and would be run
into from the rear. He assured them that before anything of a concrete
nature would be done, they would be informed. He added that the school would
save between $2,000 to $5,000 per year by not having to bus the child�en.
A member of the audience said that under this proposal, three hoses w�ould be
lost. Mr. Ken Fransen agreed, that a through street through this residential
area is not the answer to no left hand turns on East River Road. The City
Engineer reiterated that this is a concept only and the residents are getting
too far ahead of themselves, and detailed questions cannot be anawered.at
this time.
A resident of the area stated that he would like to go on record as being
opposed to having this street qoing through. Mayor Kirkham informed the
�
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST �, 1969 PAGE 10
audience that the only reason it is on the Agenda tonight is to receive the
petition. He said that he disliked bei�ng told that the Council is going
ahead. The Council has only said that they like this idea. The reason is to
control the traffic and to try to cut down on accidents on East River Road
and protect the children walking on the s�reets. The County is currently
studying this concept with left turns only. He said that he, personally, has
decided that he did not want to lose these three homes either, but that does
not preclude the continuance of the study.
A resident of the area said that he would also be against the taking out of
homes, and felt that the residential and commercial traffic should be kept
separate, however, he did approve of the idea of the le£t turns only. Mr.
Richard Harris, 6200 Riverview Terrace, asked if the signal for the school
has been approved. Councilman Samuelson said that it has been ordered. He
then asked about the signal for the Georgetown apartments. The City Engineer
said that the County is studying this and when the study is canpleted, they
will put in the sigsals, with cost participation by the City. Mr. Harris
said that apparently some of the people have been misinformed and they thought
that this would be a package deal. Councilman Samuelson said that if the
City of Fridley were to do everything in one year it would make the mill rate
go way up, and it must be a staged program and may take many years to complete.
Mr. Fransen asked if. it has been determined where the signal will go at the
Stevenson School. Councilman Sheridan said probably at the interaection. He
said that at the time this concept was first discussed, a walkway was con-
sidered rather than a road. The same would apply to the other side of East
River Road. He felt that the idea of left hand turns only, is a good concept,
and that the Council felt that the County will try to eiiminate as many
egresses and ingresses as possible off East R�ver Road.
Councilman Liebl pointed out that when this was discussed previously, he
was the Councilman who said that if a thoroughfare is proposed through there,
the people will object, and will be strongly against any condemnations. They
feel that this concept does not alleviate the problems on East River Road, by
making a thoroughfare out of Riverview Terrace. A member of the audience said
that it would 'lie ha�td to believe that it would be confined only to local
traffic, and would be a self-defeating purpose.
PETITION #36-1969 - PETITION IN REGARD TO THE SEGMENTS OF THE EAST RIVER
ROAD PLANNING CONCEPT RECENTLY APPROVED BY THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL CON-
CERNING THE EXTENSION OF RIVERVIEW TERRACE, FROM MISSISSIPPI WAY TO SOUTH
RIVER�EDGE WAY, AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SEMAPHORE AT EAST RIVER ROAD
AND RIVER EDGE WAY SOUTH:
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to receive Petition M36-1969. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
RECESS:
Mayor Kirkham declared a recess from 10:30 to 10:45 P.M.
ORDINANCE �1431 - AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO
VAC�TE STREETS AND ALLEYS AI�ID TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE: (Portion
of Horizon Drive) � '
,
'
,'I
u
�
�
,
II
,
�
,
�
'
'
'�
,
'
'
'
'
' REGULAR COUi�i:1L MEETING OF AUGUST 4 1969 FAGE 11
v
'
MOT�ON by Councilman Liebl to adopt Ordinance #431, waive the reading and
, order publication. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a roll call vote,
Liebl, Samuelson, Sheridan, and Kirkham voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
' FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 402 OF THE CITY CODE:
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to approve the Ordinance on first reading and
, waive the reading. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a roll call vote,
Samuelson, Sheridan, Kirkham and Liebl voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
' FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 105.01 OF THE CITY CODE:
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to approve the Ordinance on first reading and
' waive the.reading. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a roll call vote,
Kirkham, Liebl, Samuelson, and Sheridan voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
,
'
'
�
,
RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION #119-1969 DELETING CERTAIN STREETS FROM THE PRO-
POSED 1970 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, ST. 1970-1 AND ORDERING THESE STREETS
TO BE IMPROVED IN THE YEAR 1972: (Passed July 21, 1969)
Councilman Samuelson reported that he had received some calls concerning the
street improvement of 70th Way from East River Road to Hickory Drive. This
street is in about the same condition as Locke Lake Road and Hicko�y Street.
With the Council's pe�ission, he would lika to reconsider the motion of
July 21, 1969.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to bring back for reconsideration the motion
adopting Resolution #119-1969 of July 21, 1969. Seconded by Councilman
Sheridaxr. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to add to the list of deletions on Resolution
' #119-1969, the street improvement of 70th Way from East River Road to Hickory
Drive. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
'
,
The City Engineer said �hat he wanted to point out that there will be storat
sewer work done in this street, so 70th Way would be partially assessed.
Councilman Samuelson said that this is understood, and the people are only
talking about the street surfacing.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to ratify Resolution #119-1969 in it's amended
, form. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
'
1
'
RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION �120-1969 AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF SPLIT LIQUOR
TO THE VOTERS: (Passed July 21, 1969)
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to ratify Resolution #120-1969. Seconded by Council-
man Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
REGULAR C4�v�'�Str;:i� :PIEETIIt?G OF AUGUST 4 f 1969 �,��E 1.2
RESAIaUT�ON ��.34-1969 - RESOLUTION ORpERING IMPRO�IEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND
SP�CIFICAT'iONB AND ESTIMATES OF C09TS THEREO�e STREET IMPROVEMEA1T PR0.7ECT
�aT. 1969-3 - ADDENDUM #2: (Rivervi.ew Heights area)
Mayor Kirkham commented that it seemed in the final analysis of the dis-
cussion that the lnajority of the residents wanted the improvement. Council-
man Sheridan asked of the City Attorney; what would be the legal standing of
the Council if it felt unanimously that an improvement should go in regard-
less of what the residents wanted, if it was felt by the Council to be
necessary for the health and welfare of the residents. The City Attorney
answered that a 4/5 vote would be necessary to levy special assessments.
Councilman Samuelson pointed out that by ordering in this iunprovement as it
is in the speaifications, is really a waiver of the City Code requirements.
He questioned how to protect the Council and future Councils from the same_
type of requests for a cheaper street. He asked if a xesolution could not
be passed stating that this waiver is allowed in Riverview Heights as it is
a flood plain. Councilman Sheridan agreed and asked the City Attorney
and the Administration to draw up the resolution for ratification.
MOTION by Councilman Sher3dan to adopt Resolution #134-1969. Seconded by
Councilman SamuelSOn. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried.
RESOLUTiON`'�135-1969 - RESOLUTION GRANTZIJG A WAIVER OF THE CITY CODE
REQUIREMENTS AS PERTAINS TO CURB, GUTTER, AND STREET 4dIDTH� �RO�
JECT ST. 1969-3 - ADDENDUM #2, BY REASON OF IT BEING A FLOOD PL,AIN, AND
PROVIDING FOR SLOPE EASEMENTS WHICH WOLiLD EXPIRE IN ONE YEAR:
The City Engineer indicated that as the i.mprovements proposed are minimal,
and sub-standard, the people should not expect a top job and should �xpect
to live rrith some problems. The best job as possible with the limited•
improvement monies will be done.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt Resolution #135-1969. Seconded
by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried.
The City Attorney asked what the Council wanted to do if some of the people
will give the slope easements free and some will not. Councilman Liebl said
that he preswned they would have to be gained through condemnation and
assessed back. Councilman Sheridan said that�he felt that if they cannot
all be gained free, then it would only be fair to pay for all. If, for
instance nine people are willing to give them free and one will not, then there
should be an appraisal made, everyone paid, and the cost assessed back to the
project. Without the easements, the dike is impossible.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 23, 1969:
1. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #69-09, MIKE O'BANNON: Lots 11, 12, 13
& 14, Auditor's Subdivision #22 and Lots 1 through 16, 24, 25, & 26,
Block 1, Irvington Addition.
MOTION by Counc�lman Samuelson to set the Public Hearing for the preliminary
plat requested by Mike O'Bannon for September 8, 1969. Secanded by Councilman
p ' a�q �+�e, M��ror Kirkha.� �sQlared the motion
carried,U on a voice vote, all votj,4.p � ��� A„�k •�,,
,
'
'
'
'
��
�
'
'
'
�
'
'
'
'
L�
�
'
'
'
' �
I '
'
'
,
REGULAR COUNLIL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969 PAGE 13
2. PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT P.S. #69-10, GALIAGHER ADDITION, WILLIAM H.
GALLAGHER: West 5 acres of NW�i of SE�, except south 4 acres, Christie
Addition.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to set the Public Hearing for the preliminary
plat requested by William H. Gallagher for September 8, 1969. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the Minutes of the Planninq Com-
mission Meeting of July 23, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
RECEIVING THE MZNUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF JULY 30, 1969:
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the Minutes of the Board of Appeals
Meeting of July 30, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ST. 1969�-3, ADDENDUM #2 (RIVERVIEW
HEIGHTS AREA): Bids Opened August 4, 1969 at 11:30 A.M,
SCHEDULE A
PLANHOLDER
BID DEPOSIT BASE BID
' Dunkley Surfacing Co. U.S. Fidelity &$30,972.00
3756 Gra�nd St. N.E. Guaranty Co.
, Minneapolis, Minn. 5$ B.B.
Hardrives, Inc. St. Paul Fire $29,295,31
, 10135 Central Ave. N.E. & Marine Ins.
Minneapolis, Minn. 5� B.B.
C.S. McCrossan, Inc. U.S. Fidelity &$39,051.25
' Box 322, Route #2 Guaranty Co.
Osseo, Minn. 5� B.B.
' Park Construction Co. U.S. Fidelity &$30,695.50
51 37th Avenue N.E. Guaranty Co.
Fridley, Minn. 5$ B.B.
'
,
PLANHOI�ER
SCHEDULE B
BID DEPOSIT BASE BID
Dunkley Surfacing Co. U.S. Fidelity &$64,221.90
3756 Grand St. N.E. Guaranty Co.
Minneapolis, Minn. 5$ B.B.
Hardrives, Inc. St. Paul Fire $79,261.40
10135 Central Ave. N.E. & Marine Ins.
Minneapolis, Minn. 5$ B.B.
COMPLE2IQN DATE
m
As specified
As specified
Oct. 15, 1969
COMPLETION DATE
As specified
REGUL�iR CE'it3,;;.�:��:� ;�fEFTING OF AUGUST 4, 1969 ����; �,� '
St. 1969-3, Addendum #2 - Schedule B bids continued.
PLANHOLDER
C.S. McCrossan, Inc.
Box 322, Route #2
Osseo, Minn.
Park Construction Co.
51 37th Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minn.
BID DEPOSIT
U:S. Fidelity &
Guaranty Co.
5$ B.B.
BASE BID
$92,658.10
U.S. Fidelity & $66,135.00
Guaranty Co.
5� B.B.
COMPLETION DATE
As specified
October 15, 1969
Councilman Samuelson asked how long it is before the bid award has to be made.
The City Attorney replied within 30 days, and added that it would take about
two weeks to get appraisals made, if condemnations should prove necessary.
The City Engineer suggested showing the people pictures of what the slope
would look like, as he thought that they still cannot visualize what is
being proposed. He added that time is running short, and that the bids came
in about 25� higher than estimated. He explained that Schedule A is for the
blacktopping and Schedule B is for the dike and storm sewer work.
The City Engineer reported that Hardrives, Inc. had specified in their pro-
posal that they did not want Schedule A unless they got Schedule B also,
however, they were not the low bidder on Schedule B. These were let as two
separate bids.
The City Attorney advised that since Hardrives,, Inc. has put this stipulation
in writing, and they were two separate bids, the award could then be made to
the second lowest bidder on Schedule A.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to award the bid for Schedule A of St. 3.969 -
Addendum #2 to Park Construction Company in the amount of $30,695.50, and
Schedule B of St. 1969-3 - Addendum #2 to Dunkley Surfacing Company in the
amount of $64,221.90. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
CONSZDERATION OF PROPOSAL AND AGREEMENT - FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICE
(EHLERS & ASSOCIATES)
The City Attorney said that he did have one comment to make, and that was a�
paragraph concerning the schedule of payment for work on government grants.
He wondered if they proposed to be paid on the same percentage schedule. The
Finance Director said that it was his understanding that they were to be paid
for work on a project even though it did not go through. The City Attorney
said that it seemed to him that if work is done on security government grants
it should be payment on an hourly basis rather than a,percentaqe of the qrant.
Councilman Samuelson commented that this would apply to any work that they
would have done on the park bond issue that fail�d. The City Attorney said
that he may be misinterpreting the intent. It was agreed that the City
Attarney and the Finance Director would talk to Mr. Ehlers on the intent of
the paragraph.
CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE:
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to table this item. Seconded by Councilman
Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, aZl voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
,
'
�
'
��
'
'
'
'�
�
�I
CI�I
C�'
,
'
'
'�
'
'
I�
,
�
'
'
�
'::.
'
REGULAR COUNCI�, MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969
GONSTAERATION OF THE pROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE:
PAGE 15
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to table consideration of the proposed Zoning
Ordinance. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
R�SOLUTION #136-1969 - RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE USE OF RICE CREEK WATERSHED
AREA, OR ANY LAKES CONNECTED THERETO, AS A RECIPIENT OF SEWAGE EFFLUENT:
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Resolution #136-1969. Seconded by Council-
man Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
RESOLUTION #137-1969 - RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOINTING
ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE AUGUST 19, 1969 SPECIAL ELECTION:
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt Resolution #137-1969. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham de-
clared the motion carried.
APPOINTMENTS:
FRIDLEY HOIISING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Mayor Kirkham said that he would like the concurrence of the rest of the
' Council in the reappointment of Stan W. Carlson, 6219 Baker Street, Fridley,
Minnesota as Chairman. His term expired June 9, 1969, and the new term
would run to June 9, 1974.
'
,
'
�
,
�
'
�
'
MOTION by Councilman Li�bl to concur with Mayor Kirkham in the reappointment
of Stan W. Carlson to the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried.
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMITTEE
Mayor Kirkham submitted the name: David Cook, 6840 Washington Street N.E.,
Fridley, Minnesota (Telephone #560-7241).
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to concur with Mayor Kirkham in the appbintment
of David Cook to the Human Relations Committee to fill the vacancy created
by the resignation of Harry Crowder, with a term expiration date of December
31, 19T1. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
POLICE SALARY NEGOTIATION COMMITTEE
Mayor Kirkham said that he and Councilman Samuelson have agreed to serve on
this c�ittee.
POLICE PENSZON COMMITTEE
The City Manaqer said that the men appointed should have an accountinq or
legal background, or sosnething comparable to this. The Coe3ncil Members said
that they were not ready with appointments at this tj,�}�� �u�, �y�,� Kirkham
auggested Chuck Langer from the fi��� �r�zd, a�nd Gouncilman Samue�son
� �. �
n
REGUI,AR �QI���:T:d�..�a i�IEETING OF.AUGUST 4, 1969 ���� 16
suggested �'Io}rd �����°���a fx��n the s�coa�d �a�dA ' As neither of thes� a��n ha�re
b�en asked if they woulcl s��v�, i� e�a� ������ �� tai�le this �.tem to the
���ting of August 11, 1969.
CLAIMS:
Mc�iOId �y Coun��lman Samuelson to approve gayment of General Claims #187J.0
through #18823 �nd Liquor Claims #3564 through �3581. Seconded by Councilman
Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
L7CENSES:
f00D ESTABIISNMENT
Brothen Inc.
7501 Caranerce Lane N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota
Rapid Shop Corp.
6530 East River Rd.
Fridley, Minnesota
VENDING MVICHING
Riverside Car Wash
6520 East River Rd.
Fridley, Minnesota
East River Rd. Garage
6501 E. River Rd.
Fridley, Minnesota
SERVI�E STATION
Riverside Car Wash
65�0 East R. Road
Fridley, Minnesota
OFF SALE .
Bob's Produce
7620 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota
8Y
�Y .�' � 1�� � �'
RECON�iENDED FOR
APPROVAL BY
Wealth inspecto�
Irving P. Goldberg Health Inspector
Rob�rt Schl�et�r
Joseph Dolin
Robert Schleeter
Robert Schroer
kealth Insp�ctor
Health Inspector
Bldg. Inspector
Fire Inspector
Chief of Police
�
�
�REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF"AUGUST 4, 1969 PAGE ��'
Licenses continued.
MULTIPLE DWELLING LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL:
Auqust 4, 1�69 'September 1, 1969 to September 1, 197C
___,
OWNER ADDRESS � UNfTS FEE �
D. !. Scherer ---
6525 - 2nd St. N. E. 6525 - 2nd St. N. E. 7 S 10.00
E�idley, Minnesota � .
C. H. Miller �
1095.Polk Circte 4985 - 3rd St. N.�E. 11 •11,00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
C. H. Miller
1095 Polk Circle 5005 - 3rd St. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
�Lucile E. Blank . .
1170 W. Eldridge 5980 - 3rd St. N. E. 4 10.00
St. Paul, Min�esota 55113
Leo J . Hy,nes
2724 (rving Ave. No, 6051 - 3rd St. N. E. 3 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
�" Leo J . Nynes
2724 Irving Av e. No. 5400 - 7th St. N. E. 3 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
. Narold D. Morrow �
Rt. i, Hy. 29 5430 - 7th Sx. H. E._ 3k � 34.00
. Ri•ve�falls, Wisconsin
Wayne W. Siewert � �
3732 - 46th Ave. So,: 251 - 57th Place N. E. 7 10.00
Minneapoiis, Minnesota
Irving Efron � Dr. Irving
Herman • .
3�25 Salem Ave. 262 - 57th Place N, E. 8 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota �
Cl�fford T. Bakko,
9119 ' 13th Ave, So. 190 - 592 Way N. E. 12 12.00
Mi.nneapolis, Minnesota
Charles J. Beliveau �
110 - 61st Ave. N. E. 110 - 61st Ave. N. E. 7 10.00
F�idley, Minnesota , .
. REGUI�AR C��;��.�._,, � e�4��TiNG OF AUGUST 4, 1969
I��cex��es continued.
MUI.TI PLE DWEI.I, I NG l.l CENSES �
Au4ust 4, 196� �
- ,
._.,_ ...,:...,...,.,_._._
Lea�ard S. Jacobsen
, 140$ Frankson 6379 Highway 65
St. Pavl, Minnesota
Robert N. Conley
S336 Bryant Ave. So. 6393 Highway 65
Mi�neapolis, Minnesota
M. A. Biddle .
4800 Cedar Lake Road 211 - 79th Way N. E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
McAllister Properties Inc.
126 So. 9th St. 1200 Highway 100
. Minneapolis, Minnesota
McAllister Properties inc. �
_ 126 S�. 9th St. 1230 Highway 100
Minneapolis, Minnesota
McAllis�ter Properties Inc.
��126 So. 9th St. 1260 Highway 100
Mi�neapolis, Minnesota
McAllister Properties
126 So. 9th St. 12g0 Highway 100
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1�1. J. Dale
340 E. piamond Lake Rd. 5960 - 80 Anna St.�
Minneapolis, Minnesota
E. V. b Marcia Fuglestad
, 5174 St. Imier Dr. 6542 C�ntral Ave.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Nathan S Darlene P. Schwertz
5916 Medicine Lake Road 101 Charles St. N. E.
Minneapolls, Minnesota
Nathan � Darlene P. Schwartz
5916 Medicine Lake Rd. 179 Charles St. N. E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota �
Natha►t b.Darlene P. Schwartz
5916 Medicine Lake Rd. 180 Charles St. N. E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
� _ _.. _. .
��
8
7
0
18
�
�
18
33
4
12
12
12
�
10.00 '
10.00
10.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00 .
33.00
10.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
� .
' REGUL��R COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969
� ' .
PAGE 19
' � Liaenses aontinued. .
MULTIPLE DWELLING LICENSES
Auqust 4, ig69
' I �vi�g Ef ron � Dr. i rvi ng . ' .
Herman
3025 Salem Ave. 595� East River Road 12 12.00
t • Minneapolis, Minnesota
Ly�de tnvestment Co.
� 2700 Raleigh Ave. So. 910 Lynde Drive �� ����Q
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Cynde Investment Co. .
� 2700 Raleigh Ave. So. 950 Lynde Drive ii
i 1. 00
Minneapolis, Minnesota •
, ' Lynde Investment Co. �
, 2700 Raleigh Ave. So. 990 Lynde Drive 11 '11.00
I Minneapolis, Minnesota
' . ':: �,..
• Kenneth F. Peterson � • . .
Hubert M. Nelson
' 2441.Lyndale Ave. So. 6011 Main St. 4 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
, Ke�neth F. Peterson �
Hubert M..Nelson
- 2441. Lyndale Ave. So. 6019 Main St. N. E. 4 10.00
'� Minneapolis, Minnesota
James Rudnitski � � .
', '� 6035 Main St..N. E. 6035 Main St. N. E. 4 10.00
F�idley, Minnesota
Eds t rom Rea 1 ty �
' 64 E. 2nd St. 155-175 Satellite Lane 33 33.00.
Minona, Minnesota
. . •
.
Edstrom Realty
' 64 E. 2nd St. ' 195 Satellite Lane 20 20.00
Winona, Minnesot� .
' A. G. � Ronald L, Bruch �
212 Penninsula Rd. 221 Satellite Lane � 11 11.00 �
I Minneapolis, Minnesota
� �
W. N. Untinen
k327 U�iversity Ave. N. E.
i Minneapolis, Minnesota
F�ancis de Ridder
'855 - 86th Ave. N.W.
Mlnneapolls� Minn�
5025 - 3rd St. N. E.
5320 - 4th st. N. E.
fl 11.00
4 10.00
-
' � '
• R�GIJLAR COUNCIL MEETING OF •AUGUST 4, 19E►9 P71GE 2� !
� -
. . '
L:lcenses continued,
MULTIPLE DWELLING LICENS£S ' � '
August 4, 1969 September 1, 196g to September 1, 1970
FrancPs de Ridder
� 855 - 86th Ave. N. W. 5347-49 - 4th St. N. E. 3 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota � '
Michael Tema
4701 University Ave. N. E. 59�+� East River Rd. 12 12.00 �
Minneapolis, Minnesota .
p�bin Johnson ' � '
6824 'Ewing Ave. No. 5800 - 22 St. N. E. 4 10.00 -
. Minneapolis, Minnesota
' Albin Johnson • � '
6824 Ewing Ave. No. 5810 - 22 St. N. E. 4 10.00
' Mi�neapolis, Minnesota - - . '
�• Francis deRidder
8S5 -� 86th Ave. N. W. 359 - S7th Place 8 10.00
Mi�neapolis, Minnesota '
Bric of Minnesota Inc. �
c/o Bermel Smaby Realty lnc. . • '
5309 Lyndale Ave. So. 5700 Polk St. N. E. 32• 32.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota .
Bric of Minnesota Inc. � '
e/o�Bermel Smaby Realcy �
: 53�9 Lyndale Ave. So, 5701 Highway 65 32 32.00 '
- Minneapolis, Minnesota - �
Chris Jelevarov
: Oyckma� Notel, 160 Mississippi St. 4 10.00 '
Min�eapolis, Minnesota •
Ke�neth J. Franko ,
6324 Scott Ave. N. 5612 - 7th St. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota ' .
� Kenneth J. Franko � � � ,
63zk scott Ave, No. 5640 - 7th St. N. E. 11 11.00 '
Minneapolis, Minnesota � � '
� Harold M. Battig
2930 Douglas Drive 150 - S�� W�Y �� �� �� ���4� ' � ,
Minneapolis, Minnesota � �
. .
'
I REGULAR COiJNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969 PAGE 21
'
T,i,aenses continued.
IGEI3ERAL CONTRACTOR APPRAVED BY
' Random, Inc.
700 77th St.
Circle Pines, Minn. By: Fred Rehbein NEW Building InspeCtor
' D.L. Scherer
6525 2nd St. N.E.
Fzidley, Minn. By: D.L. Sch�rer RENEWAL Building Inspector
' Vanman Const. Co., Inc.
258 Humboldt Ave. N.
, Minneapolis, Minn. By: Richard Vanman RENEWAL Building Inspector
MASONRY
' H.C. Wagar Co., Inc.
5940 Stinson Blvd. N.E.
Fridley, Minn. By: H.C. Wagar RENEWAL Building Inspector
' GENERAL CONTRACTOR
1 St. Anthony Village Shopping Center, Inc.
25 University Ave. S.E.
Minneapolis, Minn. By: Max Saliterman NEW Building Inspector
' Cunnin+gham-Liunp Co.
1400 WoodWard Ave.
Birmingham, Michigan By: ,7ames C. Slavin NEW Building Inspectoz
' MOTION by Councilman Lieb1 to approve the foregoing licenses. Seconded by
Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kizkham
' declared the motion carried.
%3TtMATES:
, Leaque of Minnesota Municipalities
314 Social Sciences Building
University of Minnesota
� Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
' Memberehip dues for ear be innin Se t. 1, 1969 $1,477.00
� Y g 9 P
' Metro Section Dues 738.50
$ 2,215.50
� Arcon Construction Company
� Mora, Minnesota
I FINAL ESTIMATE #6 for work completed according
to contract.
' Street Improvement Project St. 1968-1A $1,931.06
Municipal State Aid Improvement Proj. St. 1968-2 $2,117.25
' $ 4,048.31
REGULAR CQUItiI��'iL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969 PAGE 2Z '
�stimates continued.
�.H. Renner & Sons, znc.
5465-A County Road 16 No.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55428
FINAL ESTIMATE #3 for work completed fo�
construction or Water Improvement Project 75-H
according to contract
Peter Lametti Construction Company
615 Dzake Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
Partial Estimate #3 for work completed for
construction of Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm
Sewer Improvement Project #90 according to
contract
�I
'
$ 2,266.15 '
'
'
$44,275.28
Councilman Samuelson asked what the total price tor I�tater Improvement Project
75-H was. The City Engineer said $14,OTS:50 which is about $7,000 less than
anticipated. He reported that one well location was found in Locke Park.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to authorize payment of the estimates. The
motion was seconded and upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried,
REPORT ON REQUEST FOR STREET LIGHT ON SKYWOOD COURT:
�
The City Engineer showed the location of street lights on the screen and
explained that one suggestion would be to move the existing light in the cul de
sac � way up the block. Generally, this area has more lights than other �reas
alrea8y and grantinq them another one would be a deviation from the Council's
policy. The liqhts costs here amount to about $10 per house.
Gouncilman Samuelson asked if the wattage could be increased from 150 to 250.
MayoX Kirkham agreed that maybe moving the pole and increasing the wattage
would give them the light they desire. The City Engineer felt that they should
be advised before the p�le is moved. Councilman Sheridan volunteered to talk
to these people about moving the pole � way down the block and incr•easing
the wattage before anything more is done.
RESOLUTION #138-1969 - RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #89:
MQTION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt Resolution #138-1959. Seconded by
Councilman T�iebl. Upon a voice vote, all vating aye, Mayor Kirkham declazed_
the motion carried.
RESOLUTIOlJ #139-1969 - RESOLUTZON DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PRO-
P03ED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STORM SEWER ZMPROVEMENT PROJECT #89:
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt Resolution �k139-1969. Seconded by
CounciLnan Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
C'
'
�
'
�
�
'
,
LJ,
C
C�'
' REGULAR C����iL MEETZNG OF AUGUST 4, 1969
�
'
'
�
'
'
�
�I
�
'
,
�
;�
1140^7.969 - RESOLUTION D
k'ROJECT
PAGE 23
REPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
MOTTON by Councilman Samuelson to adopt Resolution #140-1969. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
RESOLUTION #141-1969 - RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PRO-
POSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #92:
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to adopt Resolution #141-1969. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS:
A. MR. & MRS. F. SHIMEK: PROBLEMS BECAUSE OF DIKE
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the co�nunication froan Mr. & Mrs. F.
Shimek, 7901 Rivsrview Terrace dated July 17, 1969. Seconded by Councilman
Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, al.l voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
B. CHARLOTTE GAMMEL & IRENE GALE PLANK: REQUESTING IMPROVEMENT OF DIKE
MpTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the communication from Charlotte Gauaael
and Irene Plank, fee owners of Lots 27 & 28, Block Q, Riverview Heights,
undated, in the August 4, 1969 Agenda. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
C. MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL: APPROVAL OF COMMUNICATION REGARDING POLICE CARS
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the memorandum from the City Manaqer
dated July 30, 1969 and related material, and authorize his signature on the
letter to Commissioner N.T. Waldor, Department of Highways, dated August 5,
1969. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
D. PETITION #36-1969 - OPPOSING EXTENSION OF RIVERVIEW TERRACE TO SOUTH
RNER ' EDGE WAY
Petition #36-1969 was received while discussing this item earlier in the
Meeting.
E. MASIAN, KAPLAN, ET AL: MR. FILISTER'S REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
' APPROVAL REQUEST
Councilman Samuelson asked what type of negotiations the Administration has
� had with Mr. Filister. The City Engineer said that his requested Registered
Land Survey was put on a Special Council Meeting and approval was granted
provided he dedicate the needed land. He said that he felt that the City hae
cooperated with him. Councilman Liebl asked if Mr. Filister has contacted the
' City repeatedly as the letter indicates. The City Engineer said that Mr.
Filister has talked to the City Manager, and that it seemed to him that
Xather, Mr. Filister does not want to cooperate with the City. Councilman
'
REGULAR GOUNCZL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1969 PAGE 24
Sheridan said that he ha� a�eve� �ppr�v�d of Rec�is���ed Land Surveys anyhow.
The Cit,y Manager said that he has not answered this letter, as he had talked
to hi.m previously and Mr. Filister indicated no willingness to cooperate.
MOTION by Councalznan Samuelson to xecebve the coannunication from Maslon,
Kaplan et al dated July 17, 1969. The motion was seconded and upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
F. SUBURBAN ENGINEERING: CORRECTIVE WORK ON ST. 1968-1B
The City Engineer saici that this letter is concerning various problems,
including the one on 75th Avenue that Mr. Lind had coemplained of during the
Visitors portion of the Meeting. The City now has something in black
and white, that they will take corrective action, before this there have
anly been verbal promises.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the letter from Suburban Engineering
dated July 28, 1969, and withhold any further payment on the project until the
corrective action is accomplished. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice
vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
G. COPY OF MEMO TO CITY ATTORNEY: MRS. STRUB PROPERTY IN RIVERVIEW
HEIGHTS
Mayor Kirkham said that he would concur with the purchase of the land. The
City Manager said that he had gone down to see Mr. Shimek, who lives on the
corner of 79th Way and Riverview Terrace and he was more receptive to the
idea if Mrs. Strub's property was obtained to enable the dike to be placed
further away from his house along the creek and he would not be boxed in.
MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to receive the communication from the City
Manager to the City Attorney dated July 23, 1969, and authorize the Gity
Manager and Mayor Kirkham to sign a purchase agreement for $2,000 for the
purchase of Lots 10, 11, 12, & 13, Block Z, Riverview Heights Addition and
pick up the currently due taxes, with a down payment of $500 and the balance
due in 1970, and to make provisions in the budget for this expenditure.
Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried.
H. SOKOLOWSKI AND PETERSON: ROADWAY FOR 1641 GARDENA AVENUE NE
The City Attorney reported that he had received this letter with an easement
. for the qranting of an easement to the City of Fridley so that this property
can have public access. He said that he indicated to them that the City
of Fridley probably would not put in an improved street or maintain it as
it does not provide the adequate right of way, but at least she would have
public access. Councilman Samuelson said that in the future, additional
land might be obtained for right of way, so that the road could be improved.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the communication fran Sokolowski
and Peterson, Attorneys at Law dated July 24, 1969, and instruct the City
Attorney to write a letter to Lorraine Winkler advising her that she will
have public access, but the City will not improve or maintain the road. The
motion was seconded and upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried.
�
J
'
'
u
'
'
�I
�
'
�
�
�I�
'
,
�
�
'
�
'
'
I ��
�
i
'
'
REGULAR ^C?i3iv�:Zi; MEETING OF AUGUST 4. 1969
�. LESTER E. ECKHARDT: COMPLAINT ON WEEK CHARGES
�AGE 2 S
MQTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the communication from Mr. Lester
E. �ckhardt dated July 28, 1969 and refer to the Administration. Seconded
by Couxiailman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried. •
RECEIVING THE MZNUTES OF THE LIQUOR STUDY GROUP MEETIPTG OF JULY 21, 1969:
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to receive the Minutes of the Liquor Study
Group Meeting of July 21, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Sheridan. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carrie<i.
ESTABI.ISHING 12ETIREMENT RATE FOR FIREMEN:
Councilman Liebl asked how many full time firemen the City has now. The
City Manager replied four, tw�o first class.
, Councilman Samuelson commented that he felt that there should be some pro-
visions made for a volunteer that has worked for 6 or 7 years as a volunteer,
then wants to become a full time fireman, to prorate his experience rather
, than have him start out at the bottom. There should be some consideration
given to the experience he has attained.
'
�
�
�
�''
'
'
�
'
'
The City Manager said that this would serve to establish a classification a�
guidelines. The Finance Director said that only two of the Firemen qualify
to retire at the Senior Firefighter pay schedule. The City Attorney asked
if this sets �he ceiling. The Finance Director said yes, this sets the base
for retirement.
MOTION by Councilman Lieb2 to establish the base retirement pay for a first
class senio�; Fireman at $740 per month. Seconded by Councilman Saunuelson.
U,pon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
RECEIVING THE CITY MANAGER'S REPORT ON OFF-SALE LI UOR:
MOTION by CounciLnan Sheridan to receive the City Manaqer's report on off-
sale liquor dated August 4, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT:
Mayor Kirkham declared the Regular Council Meeting of Aagust 4, 1969
adjourned at 11:50 P.M.
R ctfully su2xaitted,
u�rcer
Secretary to the City Council
;7ack O. Kirkham
Mayor
,
1
Ill�
J
THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WORKSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1969
Mayor Kirkham called the Public Hearing and Workshop Meeting of the Fridley City
Council to order at 7:37 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Kirkham asked the audience to join the Council in saying the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
' ROLL CALL:
'
��
L�
'
'
��
,
'
,-,
'
'
'
MEMBERS PRESENT: Harris, Kirkham, Liebl, Samuelson arrived at 7:55 P.M.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Sheridan
ADOPTZON OF AGENDA:
The Council added the following items to the Agendas
10A. Licenses for Mr. Steak Restaurant
17A. Ordinance authorizing the es.tablishment of Absentee Ballot Precincts
17B. Receiving the Minutes of the Liquor Study Group Meeting of August 7,
1969.
18E. Communication from Eldon E. Schmedeke withdrawing from 3rd Ward
Council race.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt the agenda as amended. Seconded by Council-
man Liebl. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried.
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST (ZOA #69-08A) TO REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3A� GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF 69TH AVENUE AND 1,000 FEET WEST OF THE CITY LIMITS. (REQUESTED
BY KAYE W. WESTERLUND):
Mayor Kirkham read the Notice of Hearing, The City Engineer pointed the location
out on the map, showing the proximity to Rice Creek and explained that the Planninq
Com�nission had recommended approval of the rezoning request subject to getting
60 feet on the south side of the parcel which would follow the line that could
be used for daming up Rice Creek.
Mr. Floyd Vosland, the neighboring property owner, asked if there were any plans
for the use of the land. The petitioner, Mr. Kaye Westerlund, stated there will
be two buildings with 45 units and one building with 18 units, 53 stall garages,
outdoor pool and sundeck. The City Engineer showed the plans for the apartment
houses. There will be sunken living rooms, 760 Feet in the one bedroom apartments
and 1,100 square feet in the two bedroom apartments. Mr. Westerlund said that
the Creek wi11 be used to the best advantage and there will be a 100 foot front
setback to allow the neighboring homes their present view.
(COUNCIT�iAN SAMUELSON ARRIVED AT 7:55 P.M.)
Councilman Liebl asked how much acreage this parcel consisted of. Mr. Westerlund
said that it was just shy of 7 acres.
2�
.
PUBLIC HEARING %#ND WQRKSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1969 ,r-��;;-<-a�
� r.
The neighbor, Mr. Vosland, said that he built and managed apartments and that
he was in favor of apartments on this site and that they should increase the
value of his property if they were beautiful apartments and not too boot like.
No one else wished to speak on this requested rezoning.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to close the Public Hearing. Seaonded by Council-
man Liebl. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the
Public Hearing closed at 8:00 P.M.
CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING REQ[3EST (ZOA #69-07} OF AREA BOUNDED ON THE NORTH
$Y 60TH AVENCJE, ON THE SOUTH BY 57TH AVENUE LYING BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND
UNIVERSITY AVENUE:
It was pointed out that the Public Hearing Notice should read "bounded on the
north by 60th Avenue" rather than 61st Avenue.
Mayor Kirkham read the Notice of Hearing, and said that this public heari.ng
concerns the area generally referred to as the Hyde Park area. Mayor Kirkham
asked how many people were present regarding this Public Hearing. Many hands
were raised (approximately 20). Mayor Kirkham asked if there was angone present
opposed to this rezoning. Np one raised their hand.
A gentleman in the audience asked that the different zoning categories be
explained as he was not too sure of their meaning. The City Engineer showed
the areas that were to be C-2 and explained that this was a General Business
area which �vould allow a number of different types of commercial or retail
businesses and pointed out the R-3A area which would be apartment buildings.
The gentleman asked if there would be a limit on the size of the apartment
buildings. The City Engineer said that the R-3A zoning requires 2,500 square
feet for one apartment unit, so the size wou�d depend on how much land was
available. iie said R-2 zoning allows double bungalows.
Mayor Kirkham explained that it this rezoning was adopted, it will not mean that
anything is going to be wiped out but will just enable the people to make
these changes.
A gentleman asked what this change would do to the taxes. The Assessor said
that this will not necessarily increase taxes as many things figure into the
value of building. Sometimes the building will increase and the land decrease,
or vice versa, and it would be hard to say what a couple of years from now
would bring. A woman living at 5942-2�# Street asked about the value of her
property. The Assessor said that he would have to see the home. If it is a
�ice modern hoa�e, the change could be a little detrimental and if it is a
small hame, this may increase the land value. He told her if she would call
in, he w�ould look at her property the next day.
Mayor Kirkham said he hoped the people would not get the idea their taxes won't
go up as he thinks the taxes will go up all over the country, that it would
�ot necessarily be the rezoning that would cause taxes to go up.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to c�ose the Public Hearing. Seconded by Council�
man Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared
the Pub�ic Hearing closed at 8:12 P.M.
'
,
I�
'
'
CJ
,
'
,
LJ
�
�
I__1
,
�
�
'
'
,
' �,
PUBLIC HEARIN� t��D WQRKSHOP COUN�IL MEETING OF AUCUST 11, 1969 �`�
'
CONSIAERATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJ�CT ST. 1970-4:
, Mayor Kizkham read the Notice of Hearing. The City �ngineer said that this
is an ex�ension of the rezoning study that was presented to the people
previously. He pointed out that to make the area feasible, the traffic flow
, should have a slip off from T.H. #47 south into the area and eventually 3rd
Street connected into 57th Avenue. He said that the area at the top of the
loop would be one-way traffic which will go south alonq T.H. #47. He said
, that this project will include the slip off, service road and loop, 3rd
S�zeet and 2� Street improvement and the cross streets between 3rd Street
and 2� Street.
' Mr. E1don Schmedeke asked that 3rd Street from 60�h Avenue to 58th Avenue
and 2� Street from 58th Avenue to 60th Avenue and the 59th Avenue cross
streets be held in abeyance until 1975, which is the time that the peoQle
' were notified it would be done originally according to the 10 year Street Plan.
Mayor Kirkham asked if he was suggesting that only the new construction be
done and he replied yes.
'
�1
�
,
'
,
'
u
'
,
,
Mr. L. Muggli said that he owned Lots 27 and 28, Block 12 and that the loop
road will take his extra lot and it seems, part of the building. He said it
seemed to him his land will be cut up and he will be assessed for the damage.
Mr. Muggli said that he was told earlier that he could not sell. The Finance
Director said that the�estimate per front foot was $10.95 and it would be an
even assessment along each parcel. Mayor Kirkham said that the land would
not just be taken, there would be some compensation. The City Attorney
explained that there would have to be negotiations agreeable to both partie�
or else three appraisers would value the land before and after the change
and if he sti11 didn't agree with the price, he would be entitled to a
hearing before the pistrict Judge. Mr. Muggli said he �hought the damage
could be qui� great and that it doesn't look good to him. Mayor Kirkham said
tt►at this area has been studied a long time trying to find the best solution
for the mo�t people. He said he would be compensated and if he feels it is
not just, there is recourse. Mr. Muggli said he agreed with Mr. Schmedeke
that the streets should be held in abeyance.
Mr. Don,Waiting, 247-57th Place, said that he felt the streets would be
qood for commercial developments, but the property owners havs to pay for them
and ther� the coanmercial comes in. He asked who wants this project, Mayor
Kirkham said that it has been requested by the people involved. He said
that it may not be 100$ of the people, but it had been petitioned and the
Council had looked at a qreater area for the overall picture. Mr. Waiti.ng
felt the little guy will be penalized. Mayor Kirkham said that this would
make the selling price higher becau$e it will be a better value.
Mr. Knapp, who said he lived on the corner of 60th Avenue, said he was not
against the rezoning, but was worried about the road going in because he
felt it would devalue his property. Councilman Liebl said that he would
have to be given access to his garage. Mr. Knapp objected to looking at the
aervice road all the time.
Mrs. Oberg, 5945-2� Stzeet, said she could not see the point in the improvement
as the cammercial coming in might not like the improvement and she fel� they
should let the businesses pay when they do caae in.
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORKSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1969 �s�
Sh� said She did not know one person who asked for the streets and she did
not want �a p�y for them unless the people on her street wanted them. Mayo�
ICirlcham said she wouldn't pay for 2� Street if the suggestion by Mr.
Sehmedeke was followed, Mrs. Oberg asked the cost on the slip off and
sexvice road. The Ci.ty Engineer said �he whole praject was estima�ed at
$96,910, and the slip off and service road would be $44,660 which would ba
assessed over the whole area up to the east side of 2� Street at $10.95 per
front foot. The Finance Director said that a 40 foot lot would pay $438, an
80 foot lot would pay $876 and 120 foot lot would pay $1,314.
MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by
Councilman Lieb1. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham
deel��ed the Public Hearing closed at 8:47 P.M.
(THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARING OI3 THE AGENDA WAS SCHEDULED FOR 9:Op AND IN THE
MEANTTME SEVERAL ITEM$ OF NEW BUSINESS WERE TAKEN UP)
LICENSES: MR. STEAK RESTAURANT:
The City Engineer said that the licensee has met the health requirements
and has an opening day set. He said that there are no serious problems and
recommended the licenses be granted subject to the petitioner qetting a
partial Certificate of Occupancy.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to grant the �o�.lowing l�censes subject to the
petitioner getting a partial Certificate of Occupancy.
FOOD ESTASLISHMENT
Mr. Steak
5895 University Ave.
Fridley, Minn.
CIGARETTE
Mr. Steak
5895 University Ave.
Fridley, Minn.
BY
Thomas H. Powers
Thomas H. Powers
RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROVAL BY:
Health Inspector
Chief of Police
The mation was seconded by Councilman Saznuelson. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nays, Mayor Kirkham decla�ed the motion carried unani.mously.
APPOINTMENT: AGCOUNTING CLERK
MOTION by Councilman �iarris to apQrove the following appointment:
NAME
POSITION
SALARY REPLACES
Vizginia L. Rennix Accounting Clerk $348.00 Betty S. Coyle
6a3-�7�j Avenue N.E. (Liquor Inventory)
Columbia Heights, Minn.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there
beinq no nays, Mayor Kirkham declazed the motion carried.
0
'
'
'
�
'
,
'
'
�
�!
�
'
�J
'
,
,
'
'
�
LJ
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
LJ
'
'
'
'
'
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORKSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1969
F'ZLINGS FOR PRIMARY ELECTION:
��
The Finance Director stated that this memo was to give the Council informa-
tiot� about the people who have f�.�,ed �or the Office of Councilman in the
��-rst and Third Wa�d. He said that �heze will have to be a Primary Election
�.n the First Ward and October 3, I969 would be the last date possible for
halding it, but that is a�r�daX. Ccauncilman Samuelson said that
Septetnber 30th would be the last lega�. Tuesday available.
MOTION by Councilman Harris �o se� the date of September 30, 1969 as the
date of the Pri.mary Election in the City of Fridley. Seconded by
Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, M�yor
Kix'kham declared the motion carried.
REQUEST BY PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR RELEASE OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
FOR ST. 1969-3, SCHEDULE A:
The City Attorney said that the difference in the bids of the companies
bidding on Schedule A, ST. 1969-3 were quite small and it would be a
convenience to the City to have one contractor doing both Schedule A and
Schedule B. The City Engineer said that this would be Dunkley Surfacing
Company, because they had gotten the bid on Schedule B.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the letter from Park Construction
and award the bid for Street Improvement Project ST. 1969-3, Schedule A,
to Dunkley Surfacing Company, 3756 Grand Street N.E., in the amount of
$30,972. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson� Upon a voice vote, there being
no nays, Mayor Kirkham decla�ed the motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 142-1969 TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR TREE BEAUTIFICATION
PROGRAM: .
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Resolution No. 14�-1969. Seconded by
Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayo7r
Kirkham declared the motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 143-1969 TRANSFERRING CERTAIN COSTS AND EXPENSES FROM 'FHE
1968 STREET CONSTRUCTION TO STORM SEWER PROJECT #89;
MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution No. 143-1969. Seconded
by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice y�te, there being no nays, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried.
CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 1970:
The Council directed that this item is to be put back on the aqenda at the
next regular Council Meeting, August 18, 1969.
CONSIDERATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1970-1, ADDENDIIM �1:
Mayor Kirkham read the Notice of Hearing and a8ked how many people were
present in the audience for this Public Hearing. Six people raised their
hands. �
.
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORKSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1969 °�1
M�. Parvel Skabrat, living in the northwest corner of West Moore Lake
p��ve and 57th Avenue, asked about his assessment. He was told that his
���ntage on �azigold Terrace would be assessed at $10.10 and would come
to $1,161.5Q, and hi� side yard which �s on West Moore Lake Dr�ve wi11
be aharged for 1/3 0� the side yard. The Finance Director explained the
asSessment pplicy on side yards. A g��tleman said he had no driveway and
asked if he should put stakes out. T�� City Enginee� said he could show
the co�tra�tor where he wanted the cu�b �uts. Mr. Harold Brezny, 690T59�h
Avenue N.E., asked if there was going �� be storm sewers put in qn 59th
Avenue. The City Engin�er said the�e �s drainage on 58th and Monroe, bu�
�he�� mi�ht b� � minar �ddition on West Mop�e Lake Drive. Mayor Kirkham
asksd Mr. Brezny if he was �or the prQject and he said he was.
MQTIQN by Councilma� �arris tp Glose th� Public �ear�ng. Seconded by
Councilman Samuelson. upon a voice vate, �her� be�ng na nays, Ma�or
K�rkham declared the Public �earing elosed at 9:08 P.M.
CONSIDERATTON OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1970-2:
Mayar Kirk�am zead the Notice of Heari�g.
l. F1EST MOOEtE LAKE pRIVE :
Mr, Harry Nawrocki, 5800 West Moore Lake Drive, ques�ioned where the
Councilman from their Ward was. Mayor �cirkham said that Councilman
Sheridan was absent this evening. Mr. Nawroaki asked why the earla.er
Public Hearing projects had cost about $10.00 per f�t while this
asaessment will be $11.83 per foot. The Finance Director explained that
evei� though every street costs the same to install, the assessment rates
wil.�. vary because there is not always the same amoixnt of assessable
frontage. There are streets which have lats of side yards which cut
down on the assessable property. He said that this stzeet will cost
more than the people will be assessed because it �.s a State Aid Street.
xhe people will only be assessed the co�t of a typical residential
street, but the street that iscping in will be a better street and State
Aid funds will make up the differenc�. Mr. Nawrocki asked why this
should be a better street. He said they did not need the street or the
sidewalk. He said that if it is a 9 ton street for trucks, it should
come out of the general fund and he should not have to pay more. Mayor
Kirlthata pointed out that he will not be paying more, the State Aid Furid
wi11 be paying the additional amount. Mr. I3awrocki said that now that
the City has the equipqnent for a�e-lay,�,hy not use it and they could get
along until 1974 when they were told it would be done.
Mx. Sernard Altermatt, 5831 West Moor� Lake Drive, said that they were the
third family to move into this area ar�d they had been assured there would
be no sidewalks. Iie was concerned about havin� tQ 1QSe tize Amex'ican E1m
boulevard treea. Mayor Kirkham said he did not know if the trees had
been considea�ed and thanked him for dzawing them to the Counail's attention.
Mr. Altermatt also felt the Drive-�n Theatre should have to pick up their
own litter instead of the property owners.
Mx. Henx'y Sweet, 5881 West Moore Lake Drive, said he did not mind the chuck
holes because they s�owed down the speeders. He said he would need a
ze�a�ning wall for sidewalks and against storm sewer as he didn't think
they needed it.
, R(7
PUBLIC HEAFTR?': AND WORKSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 19E9 �)ti
�I
,
He said maybe the street was needed, but it seemed like a lot of money.
The City Engineer exp]ained the City policy of not putting in permanent
streets unless all utilities are in. Mayor Kirkham told Mr. Sweet that the
cast of the retaining wall would be �art of the project costs.
, Mr. Warren Harper, 5801 West Moore Ldke Drive, said he was opposed entirely
to the project. He thought it only needed resurfacinq and he was concerned
abput high taxes and how ha.rd they were hitting the people on a fixed income.
He asl�ed if the Counci.l had any intention of getting the Highway 100 Twin
' Az'ive In to pay anX money, and he wanted to know who would clean the side-
wa�ks in winter after the snowplow t�ent by and filled them again.
'
'
'
'
��
Councilman Liebl said that there was a 1ega1 question on what could be done
about Highway 100 Drive In and he did not think they could be made to pay
as the City policy is not set up that way. He said that there are side-
walks on 61st Street and last year the City did a pretty good job, but
that it was hard with a heavy snow.
Mac. Harper asked if the School District could put in money also. Council-
man Liebl said that this was in his school district, so it would be coming
from the same pocketbook. He explained that the City budgets 2 mills to help
the people on the sidewalk costs and the rest is assessed to the property
owner. Councilman Liebl said the sidewalks were started fran 61st to the Junior
Hiqh School at the request of the School Board for the safety of the
children and this will save tax money by not having to bus the chiidren to
school.
George Bray, 5781 West Moore Lake Drive, said he did not feel they needed
sidewalks. He was for resurfacing of West Moore Lake Drive, but not for
any sidewalks. He felt commercial help was needed and suggested it come
from 100 Twin Drive In which uses the street more than the people do.
' Mr. Skabrat said that Bloomington has sidewalks and in the winter 9 out of
10•blocks are not pZowed and he asked about the City's policy. The City
Manaqer said that the first priority has to be the streets and than the
sidepalks.
,
,
C�
,
,
'
,
Mr. Raymond Delano,.5791 West Moore Lake Drive, said he was opposed to
the sidewalk, curb and gutter. He said it doesn't look necessary up to
where they live.
Mr. Bernard Young, 5751 West Moore Lake Drive, said he had heard that the
Drive In is going to be taxed out of it soon and a commercial development
will be aoming in, and if the street is delayed. there will be more
ca�nercial to pay for that side. The Council explained that whoever owns
the land wi11 be assessed no matter what is on the land. Mr. Young asked
about storm sev�ers. Mayor Kirkham said that any storm sewer work would
be minitnal, such as movinq manholes. Mr. Young said he would go on record
opposed to the road, sewer, curb and sidewalk.
Mayor IC�rkham said he would ask for a show of hands on this project. He
asked how iaany people were present in regard to the West Moore Lake Drive
project? T�+enty people raised their hands.
PUBLIC HEAR?°�z^ AP�I� ?dC)RKSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 19E�� �s''?
qj�.Y
He asked i� the whole project is pu'� in including the street and sidewalk,
hpW inany people want it? No one raised their hands. Mayor Kirkham asked
�,caw many a�e fo� the street with no siclewalk? A ger�tleman asked why it
w�� n��essarx now when it had been prQ�osed for ]�974, Gouncilman Harris
�a�.d tk�at know.�ng the costs were goi�n� up and knowzng that the improve,�nent
is need�d, the Coun�il was giving th� ��a�le a chance to have it if they
wanted it now. `�he gentleman a�ked k� they wait until �.974, wi�.1 they
sta.l� g�t �t.��� Aid. MaXox ICix'kham s�ld tY1ey couldn't answer that. Iie
saic� �kh� State Ai.d �� basecl or� the gas tax so it should bQ sure, bu� �hs
�txeet designa�ion cQUl,d char�ge. Th� Ca,ty Engineer said the peopl.� were
givar� �he chance for ths improvement because some work has to be done on
it as it is dangerous and the City �.s liable.
Mr. Art Olsen, 5771 West Moore Lake Drive, said he has lived on West Moore
I�ake Arive since 1955 and has seen it change from a very peaceful place
because of the two new churches and high school which has increased. the
traf�ic. He said he would think the �xo�osed 44 foot street would-only
inc�ease the traffic more. He said he would be opposed to the State Aid
width of 44 feet, but the improvement is needed and he would like to see
it 36 feet wide as on 58th or 59th Avenue.
Mz's. Sadie Gunderson said she was against the sidewalks and asked why
�he sidewalks were necessary on both sides. Mayor Kirkham said the people
could say if the� would like them eliminated on one side. CounciLt►an
S�elson asked the City Attorney �h� �reser�t fine for littering and was
told 5300. Councilman Samuelson said he hoped that ou� littering
ordinance could help these people if they could see any license plates.
Mayor Kirkham said he thought the 100 Twin Drive Zn would cooperate,
po��ibly with bins at the exits.
Mayor Kirkham asked for a show of hands in favor of the street with curb
a�ci gutfer at 44 feet as proposed and without the sidewalk. No one raised
their hand. Az•t Olsen ssked if they had considered the street at 36 feet.
M�tyor Kirkham said that it would be na diff�rence in cost to the people, but
they would not be getting as heavy a street. Mayor Kirkham as]sed how
many people �rould be interested in g4ing ahead with the street at a width
of 36 feet. Three people raised their hands. Mr. Altermann said he voted
pXOVided there was a stop sign at 59th. Mayor Kirkham said that the
A�partment could check into this. A gentleman asked why this was desiqnated
a State Aid street and the Counci� �xplained it has the qualificatians
neaessary for a street to be named a State Aid Street and that it is widex
with a heavier base.
Mayor Kirkham asked again how many people would be in favor.of the State
Aid Street as proposed in the improvement, with the only change being
leaving off the sidewalks. Six people raised their hands. Mayor Kixkham
a�sked if any favox�d the street being cut to 36 feet with sidewaiks. The7re
wex'e no hands, The Mayor asked once more how many people were.opposed ta
the who�.e projec�. There were 12 hands raised.
M�'. �'uVeson, 5820 Weat Moare Lake Drive, said he believed the dif�erence in
votinq was because the people were led to believ� that the cost of re-
suxfacing �the street would be taken out of the general fund and not assesse$
as a r�ew street would be.
�
'
�J
'
LJ
�
L
'
'
,
'�
�1
'
L�
�I
'
'
'
'
,
P[JBI+IC HEARING AND WORKSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1969 n(�
' J
, Cpui►��.1m�,n Harris said that this was r�qt necessarily so. He said it was not
�'a�.x to peopl,e who have improved the�,x gtreets to keep payinq for old ones
and there were only so many dollaxs in the maintenance fund and if there
Were 110 funds, the Ci�y woulc� have tv s�art charging for surfacing also.
' biac, Tuveson asked if this street is ev�ntu�lly going to have to be done.
The Cot�ncil said y�s. Councilman Samue�.son said that there has been a price
xncxease of approximately 10$ in the last few years, A woman, who said &he
' did not live on this street but on 58th Street, sa.�d that the people in her
area had voted for their street because they feel they want good streets to
drive on now.
'
�
,
'
,
r-�
'
'
'
,
'
'
Mayor lcirkham said he would ca11 for a show of hands once more on those in
favor of a State Aid Street without sidewalks. Eight people raised their
hands.
MOTTON by Councilman Harris to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by
Gouncilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the Public
Hearing on the West Moore Lake Drive portion of ST. 1970-2 was closed at
1Os10 P.M.
2. MATN STREET FROM 58TH AVENUE TO 61ST AVENUE:
Mr. John Heron, representing the Northern Pacific Railway Company, asked
about the assessment on the west side of Main Street. The Finance Director
said that the estimated price was $12.50 per foot. Alr. Fieron asked if
bei�ig a State Aid Road would decrease some amount of the cost. The Finance
Direetor �aid that 100� of the cost is assessed on industrial.. It is only
R-1 that is assessed the residential rates. Mr. Heron asked if there is a
pravision for storm sewer work on Main Street. The City Engineer said that
the drainage wi11 be taken care of and that it is basically in now. There
will not be any assessment for storm sewer on this. Mr. Heron said the�t the
railroad is not opposed to this project.
Mr. R. H. Brokopp, representing the Great Northern Railway Company, asked
again if the State Aid funds were only applicable to residente. Tk�e Council
said ye�, that this was the policy of the.City. Mr, Brokopp asked if there
will be sidewalks on the west side of Main Street. The City Engineer said
there�was no sidewalk proposed on Main Street. '
Mr. R. McClain, 6007 Main Street, asked about parking because cars cannot
back out on a State Aid Road. Mayor Rirkham said that the Council did not
know at this time just how this would be resolved as they had inherited a
pretty old p7coblem. Mr. McClain said he owned two lots and one is an
empty corner ].ot which he did not think shou�.d be assessed as much. Mayor
Kirkham said the City had to comply with State Statutes and no matter what
is on the lot, the assessment goes by footage. Mr. McClain s�id he was
opposed to this improvemez�t until the land is developed. He thought the
land should be developed first and then the street put in. Mr. McClain
thoughfi•it shauld be resurfaced now, as �.t was not supposed to be done
until 1975. He said he was still paying for old assessments.
' Mrs. Rudnitski, 6035 Main Street, asked about the parking at the four-plex
she and her husband own. They do not know if they should put the parking
iz� front or back, although the� are willing to pay the cost to finish the
�a�king lot. Mayor Kirkham said he did r:,� know how thie will lao x��g�ved,
, but said there will be a curb""�� �Y�e ,street is put it and G�rb c�tts, wil,1.-
be made.
FUBLIC HEARING 7-�ND WORKSHOP COUNCI�� MEETING OI' AUGUST 11, 196`i � j
G4unei].man T,iebl asked Councilman Harris if the County Commissioners
were going ta cooperate and make this � Gounty Road. Councilman Harris
:�s�id �hat the Engineering Office h�,� ta�itten a letter asking to be on the
�AZtutlissioner'S Agenda, but he did not knoW if they would accept the
pz'op4s�1 or not. Mr. Herron asked it this was znade a County Road, wi�.l
�.t come out of County funds. Council.man Ha�'r�s said no, but it would
be m�intained out o� County funds,
A qentleman asked if there were any �iclewalks planx�ed and if tenants will
ka� abl� ta paxk on Main Street as they do now. He was told that there are
i�o si,dewalks �lanned and there wi11 not be parking on t�ain Street, but
qpenings wi17. be given so cars can get off the street.
MQTION by Councilman Liebl to close the Public Hearing. �aeconded by
Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham
declared the Public Hearing c�osed at 10:30 P.M.
CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING REQUEST (ZtJA #69-09) TO REZONE F120M R-2 TO
R-3A, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHWAY #694 BETWEEN STIi STREET AND 6TH
STREET. {REQUESTED BX SACRED HEART PARISH):
Mayor Kirkham read the Notice of Hearing.
MOTION by Gouncilman Liebl to receive t.he communication from Mr. and Mrs.
Berhow, 5�k30-5th Street N.E., opposing thir rezoning. Seconded by
Councilman Harxis. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham
dealared the motion carried.
Councilman Lieb1 noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of
the rezoning. He asked the petitioner how many units there will be. The
petitioner said there would be as many as are permitted. The Council
asked if he was willing to share in the cost of the improvement of 5th
Street which is just a dirt road now. The petitioner said that if he
sells the land, the buyer will pay for his share of the footage.
Councilman Harris said he thought that if any future building was done
on this street, he would like to see the street improved. He said that
he noted by the Planning Commission Mi.nutes that this will only be adding
five more units to what could already be built there now as m�t of it
is al�eady rezoned. The petitioner asked if he could get some information
on what would be permitted on this rezoned property. He was told he could
Come in to City Hall and get a copy of the City Zoning Code.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by
Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor
Kirkham declared the Public Hearing closed at 10:37 P.M.
CONSIDERATIOIV OF A VACATION (SAV #69-03) OF AN ALLEY AND TWO STREETS IN
BLOCK 6, BERLIN ADDITION. (REQUESTID BY GREAT NORTHERN RAILi�Y COMPANY):
Mayo� Kirkham read the Notice of Hearing.
The City Engineer pointed out that the Planning'Commission has recom�►tended
the vacation subject to an agreement between the Railway Company and
Northern States Power regarding utility easements.
�
'
'
�
,
'
�
,
'
,
,
'
�
I�
�
'
'
,
'
�-�
'
'
PUBLIC Hr�ARING AND �VC-iI2KSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1`ib�3 �rL�T
�0'��ON by Councilman Liebl to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by
Cot�n�ilman Harris. Upon a voice vqte, there being no nays, Mayor KirkhazR
dec�.ared the Public Hearing closed at 10:40 P.M.
' RECE�S;
'
�J
'
,
I'
J
'
'w
'
�
L__1
'
�
�
'
�'layor Kirkhazn called a recess. The mesting was reconvened at 11:00 P.M.
PQLTG� P�NSION COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS:
The Co�ncil discussed whether the appointments should be by Wards. They
said that the important thing would be that the appointees have a knowledge
of the subject, such as accounting, financing, etc. This item is to be put
back on the next Council Agenda at which time the Council have their
appointees ready.
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL AND AGREEMENT - FINANCIAL CONSUL7�'ING SERVICE
(EHLERS AND ASSOCIA�I'ES) :
Councilman Harris said that he had looked over the proposal and if it meets
with the approval of the City Attorney, he thought it was a very fine
agreement. The Finance Director said he had�tallced with Mr. Ehlers about
�he suggestion made by the City Attorney at the last meeting and Mr. Ehlers
had revised the agreement so that work done on government grants will be on
an hourly basis.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the.proposal and agreement for
financial consulting service with Ehlers and Associatec3, Inc. Seeonded
by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there b�ing no nays, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried. _
DISCUSSION RE6ARDING DIKE EASEMENTS:
The City Manager said that as the dike go�es further south, the necessary
road and slope easements amount to quite a bit of encroachment on the
people's property. He said that in some areas the encroachment would be
as much as 12 feet for roadway easement. He asked if the Council had any
thoughts on the width before proceeding with the realiqnment of the dike, etc.
The City Manager explained that he had discussed the possibility of ba�lc
stabilization with the Corp of Engineers, but under the public law, they
would have to do a complete job which would be under the Federal ruZes and
w�ould be a split job which might nulify chance.s of gettinq the overall project.
The City Attorney said he had asked that this item be put back on the Aqenda,
as he was afraid some of the peop�e had gotten the idea that the slope ease-
ments were the only ones needed. He said there were 22 lots involved and
in order to move on this project quickly and to treat all the people the
same, he felt it would be necessary to start condemnations. He said that
the City could spend a substantial amount of time trying to get easements
granted and then only get part of them. He said the Council had expressed
a desire that it if is impossible to get all the .easements donated, he
should oondem� them all. CounciLnan Samuelson said this was fine. Council-
man Harris said he felt this was the only fair way. �he City Manager asked
i� this would preclude the people.from giving the easements if they wante$ to.
�-r; : "-s
PLTB7�IC H"r'at»-. »�.;�� r:�3?'° WORKSHOF COUNCII, MEETZNG CF 1'.UGUST l I, 3�3�: `% ,�;� d
Ccaun�a.lman Harris �aid he thought everyone should be treated alike, �a h�
�ht�ught the Couz�ci.l should reiuse the e�sements being giver�. Th� City
�,��pr�ney �ai.d �hat c��h��'wise you wou�.� have the situation where one
p�c��aerty Qwne� don���� tha praper�y, a�?d �he other side had to be c4n�
d��d and ass��se� to �h� pXOjec�, so �he first owner was paying �ax the
q��a�� �s�,�.ow a1so, Mayor ica.rkham 5�id he would agree -�.11 0� none.
The City Manager a�ked if the Counci�. thpu�ht �he �oad should be a on�-way
qx a�wo-�way. Cc�un�ilman Samue].�Qt� �a�.� tha�t �k�e eos� o� condemn�,ti�r�
G01.;�.C7 b� reduc�d 1�� x'educing �h,e acquisiti,Qn, a].�k�vugh �he Pub�a,a H��ring
ha� beeM held at tY�e w�dth o� 22 fs�t. Tk�e e�,ty Enc�zneer said that if
th� Stx'eat was a one-way, it could be cut down by 6�eet to a 16 �oo�
�'o�dWax ,
Tbe C�ty Afitoxne� said that if the cli.ke was ever widened from�l6 fest ta
�a �'@a�, that wou],d mean they woµ�d have to go ba�k a�d con�demn again.
Councilaman Harri.s said he fel� it was better to get the full width. naw so
they do not have ta go back.
MOTIQN by Councilman Harris to authorize the City Attorney to start
aond�mnation proceedings along the dike to make a roadway oE �2 feet.
Seconded b� Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays,
MayOx' Kirkham declared the motion carried,
CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF LIQUOR ORUINANCE: •
CounciLaan Harris reviewed for the Council the few small changes the Liquor
Co�i�tee had made in the proposed ordinance at thefr last meeting.
Councilman Harris said he would recommend the ordinance �o the Couacil
tor first reading. He said that appraximately 1p0 man hours had collectively
been put i� on it. More thought and time have been put in on this ordinance
than any other ordinance the City has probably ever passed with the ex-
ception of the zoning ordinance. He said the Co�amittee feels it is com�lete
and good and every word has been gone over thoroughly.
Councilman Liebl suggested that the fi�st reading be tabled until the
next meeting when there would be a full Council. Mayor �cixkham said that
the idea had been to adogt the ordinance on first reading betore the election
so the public would have the intent of the ordinance arrd )cnow the way the
Council is planning on goinq. Councilman HarXis said the second rea�ding
would not be held until after the election to see how the vbte goes.
Cou�ncilman Lieb1 aske2t abont the distance decided upon for distance allowed
�rom a church. Councilmar� Harris said that the Comnittee had arrived at
the f�,gure 400 �'eet after studying the whole City with an aeria� map usinq
the circlea of 2�0 feet, 500 �eet, 1,OQ0 feet. He said that the 1,040 foot
circles aveX3.a�ped each other. The 500 fee� was reduced to 400 fe� as the
Com�n�ttes felt �hia was the best, and the 250 feet was too little distance.
Co�ncilman Haxris said that the 400 �eet had been the unanimous decision of
t,he Co�nmittee.
Gouncilman Liebl asked about the Board mentioned in the Ordinanae.
Cvuncilznan Harris said that this was included becau�e other canmtuni.ties had
it, but as the City will not be granting that many licensea, the Council
will be the Licensing Board. Mayor Kirkham said that this would make �.t
pGSaible ta someday have a Board if feasible without changing the OrdinsGrice.
�
'
'
,
,
'
'
'
,
,
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
,
,
�
�
t
,
�
,
�
'
�I
�1
J
'
�
'
,
«
PUBT,I4 �F�IN; AND 5°70'?KSHCP COUN��r;, "dEETING OF AU �iJST 11, 196`.a `�
CpuncXlman Liebl said that Item 11 on Page 12 could be construed as
ir�timi���iQn. Councilman Harris sai�i that the City would still have the
��,gh� wh��hex' it was m�r�tioned in the Ordinance pr not. Councilman Liebl
��j�ctec� tsa the word "unc�ualified" in thi.s seetion.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to strike the word "unqualifizd" from the third
�.�.ne, Section 11, Page 12. Second�d by Councilmar� Samuelson. Upon a voice
vate, �here being no nays, Mayor Kirkha.m declared the motion carried.
Cou�cilman Samuelson said he wou� question the use of the name "Building
Zr�spector" in the same paragr�ph. He said that once the building is done,
there is little need for a Building Inspector �o enter, but possibly it
should say "Health Inspector". Mayor Kirkham said that it could be left out
ent,irely as the paragraph states'tlesignated oi'ficer or employee of the City".
MOTION by Councilman Harris to strike the worcis."Buil�iinc� Lns�ector" from the
first line, Sectioii 11, Page 12. Seconded by Counciiman Sa�-nuelson. Upon a
voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
Councilman T,iebl aske8 the in�ent af Item 18 on P�c�e .13. Mayor Kirkham said
that this was for the protection of the license holder. The City Attorney
sa�d that the Committee felt strongly it was needed for protection.
CounGil.man Liebl asked about tl-�e amount of insur.ance liability coverage, as he
did z�ot think the $50,000 coverage was very much monc�y. The City Attorney
�aid tk�at this had been discussed by the Commit�ee «nr3 although State Law
required a minimum of $10,000, �he Committee fel.� more sl�ould be required as
a zninimum, although any liquar business wc�uld certainly carry more than that.
Councilman Liebl asked if there �aould have tc� be another election if a Council
wan�ed to give up Municipal Off-Sale. Councylman Haxris said th�re would not
have to be an election, but protection has b�en built into Section 21, Page 21
of the Ordinance, and the Ordinance would have to be changed to allow it.
Councilman Liebl asked if the Cc�mmittee set up criteria for some of the older
businesses in Fridley getting licenses. Councilman Harris said that no dollar
�actor on investment was put into the Ordinance and they only have to meet the
cri,teria of the Ordinance, although licenses won't be granted indiscriminately.
Cauncilman I�iebl asked if this would allow room service in hotels which could
passi.bly ge� unruly with a large party. The City Attorney said he did not
think there would be anything that would prohibit room service, s�lthough it
would be determined which rooms were to have liquor sold in them. He said
that th� nuisance Ordinance or disorderly conduct eaould tak� care ot any other
problems, and was sure the management would be policing so there would be no
disturbance to other guests.
, COUnciltnan Harris said that this Ordinance was checked against ordinances from
many oth�r communities and beyond a shadow of a doubt, it is the best one of
th,e bunch.
'
,.
MOTTON by Councilman Harris to adop� the Liquor Ordinance upon first reading,
waiving the reading as received from the Liquor Coaenittee and amended.
Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a roll call vote, Samuelson, Kirkham,
Liebl, Harris voting aYer �,���� being no nays, D�ayo� ����,�am declaXed the
T� .
motion carxied. ''
PUBLTC HEAF :<ai��� �IO°KSHOP COUNCIL MEETING Or ��,L�GUST 11, 196 � ���=�
Couna�.7.man S�mue.lson said he though� �he Council should send a commex�datipn
to the I�iquar Committee for a11 the �,�me devoted to study, reviewing and
�qa;ming �hs new Ordi�an�e. The Committee is to be thankec� on behalE' pf the
�i�y Cour���-�. Q� Fr�dley.
CODI�IAEF�ITIQN QF O�DINANCE AUTHOR�2ING T�E �S�,ABLISHMEI�TT OF ABSENTEE $p,LI,,O�'
PFt�C IAICTS ; _ -�.._._..,—
MOT�QN by Couzi�ilmar� Har7ris to adopt �ai� Ox�di.nanae upo� first reading,
waiv�.ng ths read�.�g. Seconded by Cour�eilman samue�.son. Upon a ra11 cal�
vots, �Cirkham, I.ieb],, Harris, Sazn�elscaz� voting aye, there being no nays,
Mayor Ki��Cham d�clared the motion carxied.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE LIQUOR STUDY GROUP MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1969:
...-._
MpT;:ON by Councilman Samuelson to receive the Minutes of the Liquor Study
Group Meeting of August 7, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a
voice vote, there be�.ng no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS:
A. EHLERS & AS50CIATE6: COPY OF LETT�Fc THANKING MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVTGE
FOR THEIR TIME AND �NTEREST:
MOTTON by Councilman Liebl to receive the communication from Ehlers &
AssoCiatea. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, there being •
no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
B. MILLER AND SCHROEDER: REQUESTING CITY TO COMMUNICATE WITH CONGRESSMAN
MACGREGOR:
MOTION by Councilman Lieb1 to receive the communication from Miller and
Schroeder. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, there being
no naXs, Mayor Kirkham dec].ared the motion carried.
C. CONGRESSMAN CI,ARK MACGREGOR: RECEIVED RESOLUTION REGARDING BOND
EXEMFTION FROM TAXATION:
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the communication fz�om Congressman
Claz'k MacGregor. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, there
being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried,
D. SENATOR WALTER MONDALE: RECEIVED RESOLUTION REGARDING BOND EXEMPTION
FROM TAXATION:
MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the communication from Senator Mondale.
Second�d by Gouncilman Li�bl. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayr�z
Kixkham declared the motion carried.
E. ELAON E. SCHMEDEKE: WITHDRAWING Fk20M THIRD WARD COUNCIL RACE:
MQTTQN by Councilman Samuelson to rec�ive the eommunication from �1dor� E.
Schmedeke, aeconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, there being no
nays, Mayar Kirkham declared the motion carried.
�
C'
'
C
,
�
�
'
�
L!
�I'
,
�
�
�
�
�
�
'
PUBLIC HEARING AND WORKSHOP COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 11, 1969
'
rt �
��C���NG OP' �,IQUQR �TOk� ON �LECT�OIV AAY:
' F
I '��3�t C��y Ma�agex asl�ed �he citx Attorr�ey �.f �he liquor stores are rec�uired
�c� be alossd o� �1�ction Aay. The Gi�y A�torney sazd he would check on this
I' ��ic� 1et th� CitX Manager k.npw.
�H��ER OF C(k'iM,ERC� �,IQU�R BROCHURE :
�� I�, G�ann Tha�pson frozn the Chambez of Cammerce has �ec,{u�sted �hat theX be
p�x'�ti��ed to plaoe �.it�ratuxe rega�'da.ng the I�iquo� Election on, �he Goun'�er
a�� �ity Hall. Mayox� Kirkham said h� did not see anXthing qbjectionab�.e.
� MOTION by Councilman Samuelson to allow the Chamber of Commerce to display
�heir litera�ture on the Liquor Election in City Hall. The motion was
seconded �nd upon a voice vote, there being no nays, Mayor Kirkham declared
' ths motiozi carried,
}1AJOU�NMEIJT :
' �hexe being no further business, the Public Hearing and Workshop Meeting
was adjourx�ed at 11.48 P.M., August 11, 1969.
' .
' Reapeatfully submitted,
� �%�"'J
/�� � �' �'
���
' Marx Lu Strom
Acting SecretarX to the Council
'
,
'
�J
I '
�
Jack O. Kirkham
Mayor
1
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
1
ORDINANCE N0.
� �
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 402 OF THE
CITY CODE
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION I. Section 402 of the Fridley Ci�y Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
402, Section 4. Authorization to Issue Tickets. The City
Council hereby confers the power and authoritytu issue and serve
written or printed notice, hereinafter referred to as a tag, upon
persons charged with ordinance violations, upon the Fire Chief,
Health Officer, Building Inspector, Zoning Administ�ator, and
all duly appointed, qualified, and acting inspectors and authorized
police officers, of the several departments of the City charged
with enforcing the ordinances referred to in Secti�n I hereof,
provided, however, no inspector shall arrest or otherwise take
a violator into custody. Such tag shall be served upon the person
creating the violation, the owner, lessee, or person in charge
of the premises alleged to be in violation.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY
OF ,1969.
'
'
' ATTEST:
'
'
'
,
'
� '
CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL
First Reading:
Second Reading: �
Publish:
MAYOR - JACK 0. KIRKHAM
41
,
1
'
'
'
'
,
'
ORDINnNCE N0.
� �
AN ORDINe►NCE AMEI�ING 5ECTION 105.01 OF THE
CITY CODE
The Covncil of the City of F�idley do ordain as follo�s:
SECTION 1. Section 105.01 of the Fridley City Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
105.01. �lrery person who violates this code is subject to all
penalties provided for such violation. �ccept where a dif�erent, speciYic
or more particular penalty is provided. or alla�wed with respect to any
ofFensa, any person guilty oP a violation or this cate shall upon conviction
of such offense, be fined in an amount not to exceed $300•�0 or be
impriaoned in jail for a period not to exceed ninety (90) c3ays for
each offense of xhich he is convicted, together Ki.th the costs oP
prosecution thereof as are aZlowed by law.
' Whenever a different, specific or more particul�r penalty is
provided, or allo�red or required with respect to a conviction of
any certain offense, then such penalty shall be imposed therefor
' in place oP the general penalty as is�roviaed herein.
�
Pss� BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDIEY THIS / DaY OF
' , 1969.
'
'
ATTEST:
,
'
'
'
'
'
C - MnRVIN C. BRQNSELL
First Reading: A ust 4, 1969
Second Reading:
Publish:
MAYOR - � .
42
'
1
'
�
'
��
'�
,
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
ORDINANCE N0.
�
AN ORDINANCE AllTNORIZING THE ESTABI.ISHMENT OF
ABSENTEE BALLOT PRECINCTS.
THE COIJNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Establishment of Absentee Ballot Precincts.
The Counci) hereby authorizes the establishment of an absentee
ballot precinct within the City ofi Fridley, which precinct
is authorized to handle a!I absentee ballots received during
any election, primary or general, within the City.
SECTION ll. Duties of Board.
The Absentee Ballot Precinct Board shall:
(a) Receive all absentee ballots for a primary or general
election held within the municipality.
(b� Check the registration of each absentee ballot against
the permanent voter registration file.
(c) Determine the precinct of each absentee ballot voter and
report the results of such election to each precint with such
nesults to be tabulated with that precinct.
(d) Prepare a list f or submission to each precinct within
the municipality prior to the close of the election day fo� the
precinct officials to check against the voter registration
file to ascertain if any absentee ballot voter voted by
person.
(e) Reject any absentee ballots of persons who had voted at
a precinct making a notation on the envelope of the �se�tee
ballot as to the reason for rejection.
, (f) After the polls have closed in the municipality the board
shall count the absentee ballots by opening the�n and tabulati�g
the vote of each absentee balbt voter i� a n�anner which Nill
' indicete each vote of the absentee voter and designate that
the vote was received by absent ee ballot.
'
'
�
�ECTION III. Appointment of Members.
The Council ia authorized to appoint the number of peraons which
it dee�s necessary to car�y out the duties of the abaentee ballot
p�eci�ct.
4�
SEC� ON IV. Compensation oF Board.
The City shall pay a reasonable compensation to each member oF the
absentee ballot precinct for services rendered during the election.
SECTION V. Applicable Laws.
This Ordinance is deemed to be suFple mentary to Minnesota State
Statutes pertaining to absentee batbts and general election (aws.
PASSE BY TH CITY COl1NCl L OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
OF , 19b9 .
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK - MARV C. BRIIl� LL
First Reading: ,// �`
Second Reading: (
Publish:
�� DA Y
MAYOR - JACK 0. KIRKHAM
4�
��
� �
�
�
�
'
'
'
11
'
--�--�---_
'
1
'
'
,
L�'�
��
t
�
:
�: �
� RESOLUTION N0. 135-1969
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A WAIVER OF CITY POLICY AS PERTAINS TO CURB
AND GUTTER AND STREET WIDTH FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1969-3
ADDENDUM N0. 2 AND AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF EAS�NTS
WHEREAS, the improvements proposed under Resolution No. 112-1969 are
generally lying in the area which was flooded in 1965,
WHEREAS, there was a temporary dike built in the Spring of 1969 along
79th Way and Riverview Terxace to protect the area from the 1969 flood,
WHEREAS, it is advisable to improve the temporary dike ta provide a
limited flood protection and construct 79th Way and Riverview Terrace at an
elevated elevation,
WHEREAS, this general area is prone to flooding and the dike would only
provide a limited flood protection,
WHEREAS, in the public hearing, the City Council advised the people that
the improvements proposed are minimai and below City standards due to elevation
and location of the area near the River and also that the work proposed is
basically to provide a 12 inch mat and not do anj� extensive subcutting of the
soil in the roadways to be paved,
WHEREAS, to improve the dike on a solid gxound, there are additional right
� of way and easements are necessary, �
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley
as follows:
1) That the City Council hereby waives the City policy as pertains to street
�improvements regarding the curb and gutter, street width and base requ.ire-
ments, and the Streets in this area to be improved without curb and gutter
and with a minimum of blacktop surfacing and base under Street Improve-
ment Project St. 1969-3.
2) The City Attorney is hereby authorized to negotiate or condemn the
necessary right of way for the permanent easement along 79th Way and
Riverview Terrace, .and also acquire temporary slope easement for one
year in this area.
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTTY OF FRIDLEY THIS
.
OF , 1969.
ATTEST:
MARVIN C. BRUNSELL - City Clerk
JACK 0. KIRKHAM - Mayor
DAY
'
'
�
'
� '
�
i
'. . __
'
'
�
'
�
�
'
'
'
ORDINANCE N0.
� 4�
�
.�
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TI� CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY,
MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZON]'NG DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as
hereinafter indicated.
SECTIOTT 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the
City of Fridley and described as follaws:
Lots 5, 6 and North Half (N�) of Lot 7, Block 10,
Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, including the
vacated alley and the vacated portion of Sixth Street
lying adjacent to the above described lots, all lying
in the South Half (S�) of Section 23, T-30, R-24,
City of Fridley, County o£ Anoka, Minnesota.
Ie hereby desigaated to be in the Zoned District
known as R-3A (apartmente only - general nmultiple
dwellings).
SBCTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the
official zoning map to show said tract or area from Zoaed
District R-2 (limited multiple family dwellings} to R-3A
(apartments only - general multiple family dwelliags).
PASSED BY Ti� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIII.Li THIS IaAY
OF , 1969.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunaell
Public Hearing: August 11, 1969
Firet Reading:
Second Reading:
Publish.......•
MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham
'
, ZOA ��69-09: Sacred Heart Parish
L• S, 6 and N� of 7, B1. 10,
Hamilton's Add. to Mechanicsville
Rezone from R-2 (limited multiple
� family) to R-3A (general multiple
family)
�
'
,
'
i
I
I ,
I �
I
I �
'
�
�'
Z ONING
,R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DWG'S AREAS r�
R-2 ITD, MULTIPL� FAMILY DWG'S
'R-3 GEN. MUITIPLE FAMILY DWG'S �""';;:""?I
R-4 OISTRICt USE PERMITTED
�C•I LOGAL BUSIN�SS AREAS �.'�
.
G-I-S �.00AL SHOPPING AREAS ••�Y":' �
�R�I CI.INICS 8� AILIED LAB.
I
Q CITY�PRQPERTY
' � �S�NQ04 PRpP��TY
� ORDiNANCE NUMBER
� ZONE USE LIMITATIO�
4%
_� :
• __ -.__ - - - _; _ -_�---�._�•, _ �,� :
` . v � -�^�—:;
"- : ° �_ _ _ _ � ,- ;
.. -- I _ _. . _ _ � . - S . �� ._._ ! •' . . �_�
i s y T '. � . . � � . _ .
. � ' �� __wc�i_ � . it� i�._� .. K•i. =�.if� sy� J.Mff��...
._.. .... .............. .. ... .. -...._ .�_.
' _u ' '
,-!w • .. . .�,. , , . u..
1 J'- ../�--•. � , x -- -_-/ L '/' ` / �;
1! 2 = � If � 1 �/� 2! t_' _ i
� , � ,, � ' � - :
'. _ . . .._ . . . ___'... '_. __ .
�
�
II . . ) . H � � j : j� . j �
* --- --- -- -
J: 27 � . � . Zf � 4 : ,' : I7 < : ,R � : 7
_..._� __s -. .P` 1` - -t -
If .` . _ '.. _ _'v' -� �-_-
- , _._�_ - ' _�2+.._ — � '_
-e - - , 1� . /,' ... t� . . d
9` :eZ f .Y ._Jl __ � .
r r- - -
_ zi _�_- s, : � t, ,o
zo .r m � ii re a
-- i! (t /f � /l /! �� /1
�• -v_ i� p'� is is � v
--{ � .,
i� .rs • /f N is .�I ;
v �s �- - x i1 - ia < i i � i �� �'t i
v w
,. AVE. �- - ;, ,•,�.w _ N.E. y
,. ,. ,.. ,. � s - r.H --.u.. , s � < -4 .
�
,. � �
i io / R ; Je. / :H .
jx� tf ��._.. j___i =, If I i h+ . t� -.. ,1: ' �
I � ` ti : .. _3 : ( j •_ L . : t _ � : u _ � .�_ �_. _ �
Y
=7 . i
-__1G __ _.S_..
, IS . . _. `. .. _
_ 2` _. ..'___
Zf_.. +, _
- Y1�- �9�- -
-_�i_ ia
1� //
/� /1
-�. _ -� �f� -
, /7 . ✓
i ,K �r i �
LEGEND
x
i
�-2 GENERA� BUSINESS AREAS
C-2-S GENERAL SHOPPING AREAS
CR-2 OFFICE SERV. d LTD. BUSINESS
PO PLANNEO DEVELOPMENT
M—I I�IGHT INQUSTRIAL AREAS
M- 2 HEAVY IN�USTRIAL AREAS
P PU6LtC FACILITIES AREAS
�\\\\\\\�
��������
��
unonac:�
��iii
�,��'.P�.�
l�ii!y[!it
I .I
��
�
�
,
�
�J
�
�
�
�
ORDINANC� N0.
AN ORpINANCE TO AMENA � GITX CODE OF THE CIZ'Y OF FRIDLEY�
MINNESOTA BY �1AiCZNG A CHANG� IN ZONING DTSTRICTS
The Council of the City oi Fridley do ordain as follaws:
SECTION 1.
SECTION 2.
Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as
hereinafter indicated.
The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the
City of Fridley and described as:
The North 824.7 feet of the West Quarter (W�) of the
Northeas� Quarter (NE�) of tt�e Northeast Quarter
(NE�), of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley,
County of Anoka, Minnesota.
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District
known as R-3A (general multiple family dwellings,
apartments only).
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change
the official zoni�ng map to show said tract or axea fram
Zoned District R-1 (single�fami�y dwellings) to R-3A
, (apartments only - general �ultiple family dwellings).
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRII�EY THIS DAY
OF , 1969.
MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham
,
�
ATTEST :
CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Bruasell
Public Hearing: August 11, 1969
' First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publish.......
�
1
1
,
4�
�
_�
ZOA �69-08�A Kave W. Westerlund
About 1500 b�oe:k nr. 6�th Av ..
� I -- , ,� � �I i
,
a1 (4,��'�za^? �x � � � �, ` I
�� � �� �; i �, �n��
i �; I
t
(
i
�Y�� �/PiihJ�«.Sin��
� ���
n.,�
I , � �
��
,��
Qi,�e (( A/v�re/
�fre'�►�
� r
,i .
e = � �
" `:
a ',,�� � i
I a\+ I
`+ I
�
i
I
I
i
i
�
w
--..-fi�-��
S,r
o'�
—�QUt�F'f-Y-----Rt?kD- �N"-- ' _
. ��1�iy �
�`��.
\ ',7 �
�
�
WI/fI/B �pT'/ ! I� �
J�il�✓PM�Mi.lNEN `-.�- � .
�
I A
� Cw�! Ni�y .
�,.�r
_� 3,
�� _RI��
� �
_�
a��
�
4�
p►C COA.+
�/, SEC. i;
:�• z•
-t - ;ir^.
�
�NJ
N
H
�
J
�. j x . � . �. , , �. � .�� � „� .... I ..., «.• ��
.� � ,�.� L9 �` ✓ „ a
fTi�� C���k i �I, t ��.. s• z9 Z �� ; Z Q� I3 � 1, 2 3
�. , �, .-,,, ,.,� r - , � B 2 ZB 3 � 3 :.� ,,,, � ,
•i; "• .. ... �,,, .,,: �' , � ''� z� s s � 66 I/2 QVE. N. E `
.�
Ni� /� __ t � �� �' , ¢ Z � ,.N �. �,.
t �:�, f ` ; x,-, : � o � • i
' �' N� (/l�°B I* _ � � .fr
7 �i• _3- " 4 3 � Z � Q I i3 � T S • 13 _ f '.i/O 2Q G�+ i
" �ry / ` ��i � � � �� �� � � u 9 • z: f f � � j
t � Q/J � 'O 'V ^' �- �,� S z� io zi /o �� W 9 '3� �3
R 7 I�t � zo �� � ze i� �� � ii y., Z,�� �
-�1 � /9 �2 ' /f /1 /1 fl g • 4O e M¢ ' ;
��
'T av�. N.E. z� �� E�C ,B 3 ,� .� �� o�, N..w ,�.,�
� E �" �� �� �I �° .� 7 i5 c� lLS .
„ w, /' •
�J -•p' - � ' (/� u � i �i" ' �` \j � p 7 I / /S t /G /f 2 ' f, ` »,. �. 4• � .
�,3 o�a�.� In.';: � R�G� �TPr' � ,. 66 T�I � AVE. ;� N.E. ' �„ ��
��; �� . ;i \ _�, i�� i� ��E pL , 3 • , W __, .r ? ,�..i...: ..�"� 'Y . ;
1i �'� `Q (/�iy � ��3 v � i `OO E� �O 2� 2 � 2 z! , � ,�� : � � f
v i �a` �`� � �� fi ZB 3 'B �3 � 3 2 � ., ?•.2�' �,^,Q ''
►•w " _ :. ,� " ° 5 � �'4 ►- : � 4 N _ , 4 4 :V�,:,Y i ' l�ILQ _ a .
..� v�
, y ; � I Zs 5 �s i f .�i3;: � j' ;3�i•.t3� ;
%/�C.«��. W.�"�r �r ,l= � a zr c zs i W 6 �� ,». ..� y,�sl; ,. ;�� c'
Q,r, I I � 2a 7 � zs 7 J � '�-� Z 4�,i ,"''�
� : z3 e o 2 � a ° — . � 1 �.i�• '"�M- :
�
� , . -» . � . �. as y z :r � a -�t°= � 5�['� ;. W5:_.:
�y a.. � Q p��� Zi �o a zi /i M" io i; ' M,r� ., �,.—t `
p„�� Q ~� ['a ;�v i : I 20 �r zo a �� i�..,•p •. '. 6► r{ Q6 k�•
�,/ ' 3 - �� n.a� .N'�Q �T 'j °� Zl�av aacol • l 9 %2 /9 �z /s -rn4t-'ln., ; :j' }� ,Ni 1'� 'R, �'
� W� a T..! ���`aZ �' � � /B /3 /B /3 /i �e � ; •.�. �.�w� �r.;' �
N.,u l z , ��" � � �. + .�,; .�l /� ,¢ i� .�t is � � ' ; ; 8 i 7 .
I� t.«. � , ��� s. or. 4 /6 �S j /s �t ir i�„ �'„,
�..A.. '° .
,,,,, . ,... „ �• ,�, ,.:�-.» .�i= . ' �r•. . r'" '" p '
, ., . , -.�--..-...y..-�----.
' �'-_-�-.- !1� ��.. n �� --��- _ .. • �...-'�,�'� Q
.'ifM _T_ � -.�r+r{n4e.-dk°'� ... •
� r� �.... . .
„_,_,_,._.,, t I/�� :
. `
�
�
��
QRDINANC� N0.
A�1 OR.DINANCE TQ AMFND THE CITX CODI� OF THE CZTY OF FRIDLEY,
MTNNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as herein-
after indicated.
SECTION 2. The tract or area within the City of Fridley and County of Anoka
presently zoned as R-2 (limited multiple dwellings) and
described as:
I,ots 3 thru 15, Block 11, Hyde Park Addition
Lots 16 thru 30� Block 12, Hyde Park Addition
Lots 16 thru 30, B1ock 21, Hyde Park Addi�cion
Lots 1 thru 15, Block 22, Hyde Park Addition
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 27, Hyde Park Addition
Lots 6 thru 10, Block 28, Hyde Park Additio�
Lots 4 thru 13, Block 2, City View Addition
Lots 3 thru 5, Block 'j , City View Addition
Lots 2 thru 6, Block 8, City View Addition
Lots 1,2,16 thru 30, Block 11, Hyde Park Addition
Lots 16 thru 30, Block 22, Hyde Park Addition
� Lots 6 thru 10, Block 27, H.yde Park Addition
Lots 2 thru 15, Block 1, L'ity View Addition
I,ots 1 thru 3, $lock 2, City View Addition
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoning DistricC
C-2 (general business areas).
SECTION 3. The tract or area wi.thin the City of Fridley and County of
Atioka presently zoned R-2 (limited multiple daellings) aud
described as:
� Lots 1 thru 30, Block 9, Hyde Park Additio.n �
Lots 1 th-ru 30, Block 10, Hyde Park Addition
Lots 1 thru 30, Block 2_3, Hyde Park Additi.o.n
Lots 1 thru 30, Block 24, Hyrde Park Addi�ion
Lots 1 thru 10, Blocic 25, Hyde Park Addition
Lots 1 tl�ru 10, Block 26, Hyde Park Addition
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoning District
R-3A (apartments only - general multiple family dwellings)•
All located in the Northwest Quarter (NI+�j of Section 23,
T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of �noka, Minn.
Oxd. �
Page 2
SECTION k. The Zoning Adminiskratox iss d�rected to change the of�icial
zo�ing map to indicate the above zoning ahanges.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1969.
,ATl'EST :
MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham
C�Ty CLg,RK - Marvin C. Bxunsell
Public Searing: Au�ust 11, 1969
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publish....... �
�i�
, ' ,
�
�
,
�
� � �-
�.
�_
-- �
�:)2
- PETITION -
SUBJEC�T: Taxes to finance "Slip of£" from T.H. �147 to West 3ervice road in
Conc�ection with re-zg�ing �rom �8th to 60th Avenue.
Rec�,uesti Do not install Slip off' at tkii9 time. Wait for commercial
� developers to come in.
RBQUEST: We request that the 2� Street aide of blocks 11 and 12, Hyde Park Addition,
contribute less money than the 3rd Street side of sa� blocks to pay toT
the "Slip off'• to bring taxes more nearly in line with the ben� fr��
actually der£ved from "Slip off". SUGGESTED TAX not over $. p� �
00 , ra er an the �10.95 per foot proposed by City Council�
�-f devel�pement occurs. �
�REASON FOIt REQUEST: The 2'� Street residents do: not beaefit from the "31ip off"
aa much as the 3rd Street �esidents. - ---- -- -
� iCpMI�NTS: (1) Slip off will definitely increase land value of people on 3rd�� �reef"--�
and will make 3rd Street very desirable for businesa. __ _
I- -- __ _ __ �
, � _ _ _ :
(Z) Slip off does not guarantee any itrcreaae in land valut of 2� 3treet.
�31 2'� 3treet does not have any signif icant appeai !or entici�g-bnsineas--�
at present even if "Slip off" is completed.
(�) The "'commercial zoning" and subsequent "a2ip off" whic� ia--defi�itt�r -
advantageous to property owners oa 3rd Street will add only
--- nuisance value to 2'-� 3treet which may never beeo�e-co�ea�erci:}.}y---- ---- ---
valuable enough to compensate the property ownera for the cost o!'
'�S}fp off" or nuisance o€ ee�ereial properLy bel�iad Lhsm o=' Llu--- _.
loss of value of their houses on account of new zoning.
(5) If 2 SEreet eventually beeoa►es more valuable, we ara sure-tha ---
City will tax it accordingly, ho�aever, there is no reason to par ior
anticipated value which it may never have. - -- --- -- - -
� �,
,� � �./
�� ���'���� r�-� �: ,��-�-
i�- ���� �����
� ; �;,� � � ,�
, _ `%L� �.��,� �. _ �- .�_z�.:
>. .�
;
� � �� `' �---�
� , ,
. (� __ �-. ,
� . . , �% G,.',='7�-c.��/L-zi-cz.-���` GL�i�t1"
_� __ _ -_ - C` u-� �..,� ic-��:.1�-
��
, �
�_
_�
�
l/ � C./1.r GC.�I.c_.�.` � �..s . �. t-. L
� #� ^z� V
l �'� �. • � p��G�� . '�l � c��L�'t� l 1 �� ��c-�"d
O
� -�-� � � � '' �'
��
J c�iy��.����
�
0� � �u,�
� ��
� �� �
�� f.�� �
.- �
��
, � ! �
� '
;�`�-`�J --�'�z,.��'_______
SBo� -a� ,�, _ _
s—y :�1� _ � ���- �.� _
5 � �` � � �; =-� .� b �
3'�� a��-,C���
,,
,S �,�a5 r;� � U�1 _ �.
fi���� ���� S�` {'���i.
, 3-�,, �_ �,,� :f�' �l-�' .
��� �: a� � .�i°��
�'Sd o - �� ��/���
�; �� �� `�, . �
�
� c�4'!y(Q - �.�' A� �% C
GQ , vs-�: S �4r%- � � ���,
�� .
0
�
,
'
�
'
�
i
�
�
�J
�
LJ
��
1
�
�1
,
1
�
J �
- PFTiTION -
SI�.TBG?t Tauea to finance "S1ip ofi" from T.H. �47 to ideat 3etvice road in
conaection With re-z�ing from �8t� to 60th Avenue.
�"�eques�z Do not inetall 81ip oft at thie ti�e. l�iait !or com�terc�iel
develope�e to co�e in.
RSQUSSTs We request that the 2� Street aide of blocks I1 and 12, Hyde Park Addition,
contribute Iess money thai the 3rd Street side o! same bloef�s to pay fos
tl� "31fp off" to hring taxes e�ore nearly in li�e with ti� bea� !_��
actuall derived from "Slip off". $�BSTED TAX Nt a�st =.
td�[;'! the s10.lS pes loot prrpos�d bp�ty Csuacil�
if de4elipement occt�rs.
BBA3� FQt BfiQUE3Tx The 2� 3tr�at resideats dos'not benefit fro� the "31ip of!"
as much as the 3rd S�reef rasidents. � -
COMt�NT3s (1) Slip off will detinitely increaae laad valus o� people oa 3rd •freet
and vill saice 3rd Stseet �rsry desirable for business.
(2) Slip of P does not guarantea an�r f n�rease in lsad va2� oi 2'� Str�t.
(3) Z� Street doea aot have aay signiPicant appeal tor�enticfng bnsi�est -
at preseat even ii "Slip off" is co�apleted. -
- (4) 'Tbe "co�ercial soaing" and sabseque�t "s2ip off" a�kfcf� is-deif�tftely -
aflvantageoua to property owners on 3rd 3treet will add owly
nuisance valne to 2� 3treet which sar mver 8e�e�e eamse�efs��y--
va2nabls enough �o co�peasate the propertr o�rs Lor the cost oE
TM91fp ofi" or au�ence c�" ee�r�i$1 pro�sty bs�i�d Lbs4 ot-ths_ _-- -
loaa o! valw of their housem oa acconnt oi new zoning.
(S) If Street eventually t��o�s more valuable, we are ae� tha
City vill tax it according2y. ha�ver, there is no raasoa to pa� fot
� �ticipat�� valua whieh i� oay ae�er have. _
D ,
�"�/i- -t- `��'l � J�f�-- �,�-c�. �� `� �� S �� �' -� ��� S �
i�///1% t `''i /7/Zi � �/ / G�?�fi-'�//i (/ ��� .3~/ � � i/' �. r�( � ,��c.��Z��
�i'� . � � � ��-�' _ ��.�'-� " � �. � u� S `� D � � � ��� �� . �� J . �.
��� � 7�?� - ��,��� �> � � 5- yc / _ �2 ` ,�` yI �� .
�� Z
�� � � �'_ 0� � C ��� ���' .� �''C� / � /�-- �f- l�Z' � - -
� �' �/� � ��'%� �.. _ ,.q
� '' � 6/G'L.2 �� �-�L(-uT,. /l ` �-r-K�a � `i n � °� , - S , t � , � (i /C° ,
`��.�'� � -� C�� -- �` � � � " =� "�-- �� �
'( �. �'�--O�v
�� .� 1� j� . )� �-���. ,.�- � �-�� - � ` �. ��'-� -�L—
L i L / ` �,,..
, : ��v `21��;>.,��.�i�y���-� � �� 1�s1 � ,� 5.��,��
h
,, ^
� ° >� ,��..��� � ��,�
� � urr��--�
�
,ti � ���.�,�.. �
� �� �
l� �
� /.
��'� � � �'���%f.^�� !�
�' ,�-�=� �\y�� . ��-�-�--,� �
sVy �� � �2 i S r �.l�
s"� � �- 3 .-��'`��
,�'-U% 3 --�✓�L �.7- C.
_ j _`.','�G' a''� � '� '"`�''��� .
� y �,�_ � i 1� �--
�
1
..�"�
�
,
,
,
�
�
�
/� L' ..- ZYL�
�
7 `�
r�� .f,.:/ .��' r✓LC� / � .Zi��- �i iZ�%Lo��L r —�i-
�
� `'9i��
��t/"r��t,. �j� Lr ���i��. �� `;�iz ��.,� .
�� 7 D f � �' ! � ,�� �..e.�� � .�
' �, G�->�( �-' ,� �`� � `''"<� `�(
�L��'l,f� � � / .lLG uC.�� • �
/ �
r � � �-� �`�' ��. �
�'')+Hs� ♦ G'� ��;Q'i'� ..�:/"� �'li ` ilifl iZ�/Lr�
_ ������ � .
'
,: ,��p7,•y>.n.e�i''..-G�� LZ�-Ct/ �G�l/ ��CL. �.C� �s't�
� . / .�,'/`-�
�i(/ .[��i7�7'1'!'"Cl.����' �l � '��� ��4%� %��
���i� � / /' i
`t 7 lnii ���� / Lit��'iL�/G� / v W L/�{�"� `�`"�
��h�� � C�
i�(.2, � �� �'�=����✓ v ���,�e�
�
j��� � - . ,e�
r � G /- - J 9/, o\ •� ,�%% l� —
o�fv �� �'�iw� �.
I ���s��3 - �� tyl
_ ��t ��' ��� . . 3 s �.
�o��'` �-f �-✓ �` .5 y�� � �'�' s1 �1!F
� �
�
�
f� -
C�
��
�
ORDINANCE �TO,
AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER
TO VACATE STREETS AND AI�LF,'XS AND TO AMEND APPF.NDIX C
OF TH� CITY CODE
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. For the vacation of an alley and two streets in
Block 6, Berlin Addition descxibed as foll�ws:
All of the alley in said Block 6; all that portion
of 41st Avenue Northeast along the South side of
said Block 6 lying between the Westerly right of
way line of said Railway Company ax�d the Easterly
right o£ way line of County State Aid Road No. 1
(East Rivex Road); all of the unnamed N�rth/South
streets adjoining the Easterly aide of Lots 1
through 8, Block 6, Berli.n Addition,
All lying in the Southeast Quarter (SE�) of
Section 34, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County
of Anoka, Minnesota,
be and is hereby vacated .
SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with
Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07
of the City Chartex and Appendix C of the City Code
shall so be amended.
PASSED BY TfIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS I�Y
OF , 1969.
ATTEST:
CiTY CLERK - Marvin C. Bxunsell
Fisst Reading:
Second Reading:
Publish.......
MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham
_ )j
� . ' . ' . - �_� �
" . °'t`_�. , ..) � .
, ` ; ; , , , -- ' �— _�� � - --;
i � � bE , � q� � � � i i �' � 0 _ ��o ai. �✓
-..
.— —�:�.+.'wr..ti...�s.r.-.:� j. �. H...........;ya�.,,.,.,..a�L��.:��:i:�.�'..�- � { V 3 + '�'ias'"i��fi � . •
F � ,I��'. I �
� � ;` � .'., ; SAV ��69-0�: ��. 6, Berlin Add. � .
�� ' Vacate an alley & 2 Streets
!,� \ � �
�. � o �,'�.'�. 1) Alley �n B1. 6 �
' •` �;� w� 2)41st Ave. S, si,de B1. 6
;� t. '�t, 3) Unnamed Strs. adjoining E. side ri:ro�
j� ::, � L. 1- 8, B 1. 6 _ .�tn.,..� �ar�f;�
t' ' Great Northern Railway Co . '�O''�»'or �s
'
.r ' ��
,• t , ,� , , � Q I I � ^ .
� � __ c � se-��, a
v, _ ffy L � '� n•
�, • a�; _�_' �-- - 1�-•Ie'�
` ; -I10._ -IN- I � �I'"7.�.'If
li ��•.
' ! �� � �2 ,!��
, � • �f � ��% , r �* , l�.,,=(
. y �;� � ,�; '� . t `I �' �'''��
�E+ o /� Q � �. ,
, ^ �-�� R .� ' � �r / a �. � � y� .. �
� � � ` —i23 - _� � _ , (�i ��c,. �
i
� 1 � i.��' { II � :
�a y � � � I� � • .
� . _ �,e %' I• I ! �l, ::.�J �
� 4 ° •�S't'_, �-- � tibrril��n PociFit ��
. .L�. ,� >�„ .r- - � s�o � — , _ .c�';i» �y co. h a
�� � ' .1 • i�
- -- -�..�� � �� �: I,� ? 1 _ • �� _� . � o % !� ' .
� 4 1 � '„ -' }-- ---.�
3� � � ; �� '�lr,.. � 2 � �"Y - -- � t . , �
,ez.. �(. �{� �� i
� �' � '1F- � N !��' r.. �y.� .
a � �a . ' Q� � � /3 ' +-- � ' I • � --�" � '� �ja �3 ` ° � �%O
� 2 .� 2 r-=----� - ,? ' a-�s ,2 - .
� -- ,---i . � i /? 3 `� � 3 . 9 �? 9
, ' r----- - g. f !j '4 �.
.� 8 0 � , . i /i , � . 3 _ . 8
4 -- 7 ;Y� �--•---- -- —6 i� .s' -•t �' w;,� �-»•
-- - �' - - ��� � � __6 7 � i`
� r- - ; • -
�r y 7 :so I`o!—� a 6' e
� � e � �$__ - 9 � � 'i • R ! i � w9'i��i i to ti,� �� t� � � � ¢�
_` r • � ��""t'� �/ i:►�. . .
— -' -
[�ouo) a �,-' . , ; _ _... ,
ti/y nf .r � � � ' : � �I�h __.-.-��o•_ t''�i+i ` -
,�,.,r.�o,�a.;, � ,�� 4 ��hii�- .__ --- � � i : - �
- ree• i
, • , � � � hr� �� � �1 � �I • I ,
� {
,.
-"- � ' :a � �� 3 .. - l 1 � J%��
_, � � .? � � �"
� . \ . -
•� � /` ' � Ol I � x � Se�►�c: /"rZoo�
•,,• l I' 1 ~ �
, , ' /1. , '�� 2' � • ` '
� �_.. � � � . , I . �
�,.�' % � � ,\ `— �- -- ' _ s � ��;�. asisc�oid.,-r. ,:�._.: ' . . , .
. � � J J,, 1 � � �a ; � �e�Q � � ,�� � �. .
� $ I -
-��_ � 21 } � F^ Nathe�rA Paci�i�u w Z � =9 � •
� f -'w _ _ ,� � /�si/we . G� J � � Z.
• , � . Q ��- �$ Li � 4 � � ''`� ..
� ^ "`= � '�� --1-
3 ,
� ; - ` ,� , • - � s '
� ' '` e * `A � V- �. ' ,26 I �
� t �` � � � p 7 Z3 ....� :
� � t � ' k � .8�f 1 -
�� �.``' � 1 � �� 1 � � � � z:�-�-.
a � ' � -- _
�` � � � f�� v �O M �' :
�
I �
,
�
'
�
r
�
1
� � � � . .._ _
�4AUzut
I
i
'
,
�
^�° 4 D
,
\'
' /�"� /I> L ,C '�/ ' �'- . �. .�- �. ,�,d r �l�
.� %
� O G� T/a �/ /`'"'o ,e S"TR. ,� � T � � - •
SAV 4�69-03 �
��L..�E �/ V� C-�i T/ G�i $1. 6, Berlin__Add•.
�
NORTHERN $TQTES POWER C0. � �
_,.,__ �..,. ._.,�......-�- ,_...,_ I I
�J � .
� �
� �
� `
, •2G�� , .- :::.�. ;'
'� � ,. � �. ---- ;
.1 '� s° ;, .
�. �q� • �
� � �' :
, ;
� , ,
�; .
. ,`�` , ;. _ �,,
;�u � '�'
� � �� � '' �
�,� , {'.
�� i� 4 h ;�,;''
,,; � b s ` �i
� � .; � �
: � ; ,
�; � ;
h ; � �' �
'� < < � �'
,� , f
�� / A�:
+'F
i., c4��G � - NS : � �.
. �� t � �' /.Z• Go �' � .�
,.. � , .
`���� � ,
6 . - � : . Ji� . . I.�,y� ).20' ��r
t
�«.i:::.�.-^•""'�"'FZ'�,`,....... . _ . :. .,�.�.,..:�,.,.r..,.
_ . . .- - -- --- - ._ . . - -- - _ _ . - --------• - --� �
so y �
. _s� �
��
CpMPLEMENTARY DES�GN�
FQR OI.AMOROU$ INTERIqR$
QESIGNWARE �NDU�TR�E5,� : `.1IVG`,�
Efl�t�Er MAIM E{TREET N. E. • MINNEAP�1(.113� MINNE$QTA + AREA Cpp� 612 TEL. E+6Q-^J�'JQ
���i !� i i. � '.. G .. � �� r� f.� �..a _ ! :..'' ., . . ':_.: .�. �. %.. ,�3 G' . ;�! ', '� c�. .. : 'J !_ _� . N ; N N E S [J T A 5 5 4 2 1
August 5 � 1969
Ci.tq of Frid],ey
�431 Uaiver�ity Avenue N. E.
k'�►idleq� Mi�uesot� a5421
Attas Nasim Qureshi
City Enginesr
Dsar Kr. Qursshi:
�melos�d please fiad spscifications and lstters of approval and
�cceptaaca of A.O. Smith Graen Thx�ead fiberglass pipe.
We xould appreciat� your approval ot this pipe for acid �eaistant
xaste ia th� propassd additi�on to our plant at Main 8 Missiasippi.
Vary truly yours�
DESIGNWARE INDUSTRIES� INC.
/ 'j�t ��
t R. J. RINK '
RJBtso
Encl.
)�
r_ . _ _ _ _ _
REINFORCED PLASTICS DIVIS�ON • 2700 W. 65TH STREET • LITTLE ROCK, AFtKANSAS 72209 • PHONE 501 565-0301
� (�
).7
' • � (�--.� M �n � ��n (�� .
/r-JoOOa �J�O�LI�lJ°�L1VL��1l1�J� �UV�a PLEASE REPLY TO
' S300 LYNDALE AVENUE, SOUTH
� MINNEAPOLIS, MtNNE50TA 554t9
' AREA CODE 612 PHONE: 827-5656
� A ugu s t 4, 1969
i ,
�
' � . ..
?�'!r. Ra J. Rrin?�, President
Y
.
i � �esi�nT�rare Industries, Inc.
6�36 i��x�.in Sireet i?. �.
A�inneapolis, i�iinnesota �5l.�32
' Dpar �ir:
Attached please fin�3 so�ne letters of 2p�r�va1 and acceptance of
, our fiberglass pipe b;� munici��lities an� companies. I'aave
other letters of ap�ro�.Tal in the fi�es, but t'nought conies of
those a�tached would be most r:ean.in�ful to �1r. �ureshi.
, ' • Ver,y tr�uly you?� s�
� A. 0 . S�TT�'H-INLAi1D IitC .
' . I //) �
�! �.c.J �/G��t«-„-r-2i..��
' Ro�;er ?��ier:nan
District ri�na�er
' R?,r�z�kb _ .
Attach.
'
I
.
�1 � :�
� _.
1
1
1
.y,��H
� � �rr�--
'
,
L�
L�J
�
C�
,
,
,
'
'
r
'
r�n
�);)
PLANNING COP4IISSION MEETING AUGUST 6, 1969
ROLI; CALL :
PAG� 1
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Erickson at 7:30 P.M.
Members Present: Myhra, Mittelstadt, Erickson, Jensen
M;ember Absent: Fitzpatrick
Others Present: Engineering Assistant Darrel Clark
APPROVE PLANNING COI�IISSION MINUTES: JULY 23, 1969
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission
approve the Planning Comnission Minutes of July 23, 1969. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE PLATS � SUBDIVISIONS-STREETS & UTILITIES SUBCOI�IITTEE MINUTES: JULY 30, 1969
Myhra called attention to Page 2 of the minutes and the wording in the
motion for lot split �69-21 by Walter Wittman asking that the intent of the
motion be clarified. The first sentence of the motion should read "recom-
mend denial of the lot Split, L.S. �69-21,----".
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission
receive the minutes of the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Sub-
ca�►ittee dated July 30, 1969 and include the above clarification. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion c�rried unanimously.
RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: JULY 30, 1969:
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission
receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals dated July 30, 1969. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
ORDER OF AGENDA•
'
� 1.
,
'
'
I ,`` ,
Chairman Erickson explained that the two requests received this evening
would be taken in the following order: (10) Lot Split #69-22, Richard
Gjevre and (11) Arthur Deys referred by Board of Appeals.
CONTINUED REZONING REQUEST: ZOA #69-10, GBOILGE BALTHAZOR: Lot 3, Subdivi-
sion #10, Auditor's Subdivision #94. Rezone from R-1 to R-3A.
Mr. and Mrs. Balthazor were present.
Reviewing the facts discussed at the last meeting, Mr. Myhra said that
one of the things suggested was the fact that this would be an economic'
hardship if denied. There is evidence right from the beginning that the
City tried to make it clear to the petitioner it was a duplex which allowed
only two families.
�
� y �i1
Plan�i �>; ...��Eis:� =..tan I�ieetin� - August 6, 1969 .__ � .. _.. ',LLj�e 2
' The Chairman said he could understand that a retired person.y living on a
fixed income� could find that keeping the house and paying the taxes would be
dif�icult. However, to rezone the property would be bad spot zoning of the
' worst type. He was �not sure he would be willing to ask the City Council tQ
allaw the petitioner to have use of the property as three family dwelling
under the present ordinance.
,
�
,
'
'
'
�
'
'
'
LJ
'
�
�
�
,
Mr. Mittelstadt asked to have this requeat and the Petereon request op
69th Avenue clarified. The difference was that Mr. Peterson was going to build
on a lat where there was no structure, and Mr. Balthazor's structure was a�-
ready there.
The Chairnian suuQned up the discussion by saying it seemed to him that
what the Planning Commission is trying to say to the petitioner is that if
he can't put three families in the dwelling, he would have to sell. This may be
true. It would not make any difference to him if a retired person, living in
a single family dwelling, would want to put a family in �he basement, but put-
ting three families into a two family residence should not be granted.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Couanission deny the
rezoning request, ZOA #69-10, George Balthazor, of Lot 3, Subdivision #10,
Auditor's Subdivision �94 to be rezoned from R-1 to R-3A for the reasons that
it would be a very flagrant example of spot rezoning and that such rezoning
would be detrimental in the center of a single family neighborhood. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
2. CONTINUED PROPOSED PRELII�IINARY PLAT. P.S. �69-09, MIKE 0'BANNON: Lots 11, 12,
13 and 14, Auditor's Subdivision #22 and Lots 1 through 16, 24, 25 and 26,
Block 1, Ixvington Addition.
� The Chairman stated the Planning Coaanission had asked for a preliminary
plat with topog and more specific details as far as lmt �ize were concemed.
Mr. 0'Bannon came forward with the topog map. He showed the plans for the
sewer and road and acknowledge that he had forgotten to have the location of
the Skog house shown. His measuxements showed a little over 35 feet of setback.
The Chairman said he was satisfied with the preliminary plat, except for ane
thing -- that the building should be shown. Mr. Jensen suggested Mr. 0'Bannon
get a boundary survey showing the bui.ldings and the lot 2ines. This would be
for his own protection. In a spirit of cooperation, Mr. 0'Bannon is working
details out with the two owners. He would have no objections if the road were
to move one way or the other a couple of feet. This is the kind of thing
that ought to be considered in the actual computing of the final plat. The
Engineering Assistant said the Council is looking at a preliminary plat, and
until after the final plat is made, no boundaries are required.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Commissioa
recou�nend approval of the proposed preliminary plat, P.S. #69-09, Mike 0'Bannon
of Lots 11, 12, 13 and 14, Auditor's Subdivision #22 and Lots 1 through 16, 24,
25 and 26, Block 1, Irvington Addition as shown on the drawing labeled "Pro-
posed Plat, P.S. �69-09, August 6, 1969" including the area outlined in a
red pencil on this print subjec� to the provision that the petitioner pravide
a boundary survey which indicates that the existing buildings on the property
will fit on the lots as described by the zoning ordinance prior to the accept-
ance of the final plat. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
'
'
'
�
�
i
'
�
'
�
'
�
��
�) L
P��IYI�4AIZ� Cor,�e.�,sw�;;.c�n Meeting - Au�ust 6, 19E�� �'�ge 3
3. CONTINUED PROPOSED PRELIlKINARY PLAT, P.S. ��69-07, BRE�TTWOOD ESTATES (REVISED)�
THOMAS SWANSON: All that part of Lot 34, Revised Auditor's Subdivision #77
lying East of the East line of Block 1, Mississippi View Addition. Pub�ic
hearing closed 7/9/69.
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Mittelstadt, that t�e Planning Cot�mission
continue until September 3, 1969 the proposed preli.minary plat, P.S. ��69-07,
Brentwood Estates (Revised), Thomas Swanson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, the motion carried unanimously.
4. CONTINUED REZONING REQUEST: ZOA ��69-08, R. W. WORMSBECKER: Northwest Quarter
of Northwest Quarter, except North 16.6 acres and Southwest Quarter of North-
west Quarter of Section 2; also the North 34.68 acres of Northeast Quarter
of Northeast Quarter of Section 3, to rezone from M-2 to R-3.
Mr. Wormsbecker said his plan was :hat they have found some of the
ground is good and some is bad, and until they can get the City Engineer
to tell them the elevation of the service road on University Avenue, they
cannot develop the property. The ground is generally sloping towards the
river and they might have to put in four or five feet to make it level.
He said he would like to put in a shopping center, but you have to have
people and there is enough land to put in 500 families, This would be
adequate for a shopping center.
He asked the Planning Co�nission to pass the request to Council inasmuch
as they have a couple parcels of land they could sell to industrial.
Darrel Clark said the Federal Government approved Fridley's request for
Federal Aid for Park Development. The Federal Government approved the �e-
f�uest for park acquisition, but the City must bond itself for the entire
cost and after that is done, the Federal Government would reimburse 50%.
This procedure would take some time. Mr. Wormsbecker wondered if it would
be feasible to rezone the South 40 acres and keep the part the City would
be interested in abeyance. The Chairman felt this would put the City i.n a
peculiar position because if they rezoned the 40 acres and the project did
not go through, the land would be rezoned for apartments in the middle pf
an industrial area.
Mr. Wormsbecker said that if the park did not go through, and if the
, City would rezone the land to multiples, they would fill it with apartments,
and in time they will get a shopping center and same industrial -- it would
not be spot zoning, but apartments, shopping center and industry.
,
�
�
�
,
The Chaixman listed items to be considered: 1) whether or not this
corner should be R-3 development. 2) whether or not the park bond issue is
decided 3) whether or not any decision should be made until the Planning
Co�nission complete the study of multiple dwellings in Fridley, but the
petitioner has practically solved this decision because he wants a decigion
this evening.
M�DTION by Myhra, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Comaission
reco�►end denial of the rezoning request, ZOA �69-08, R. W. Worn�sbecker of
the NW� of the NW�, except North 16.6 acres and SW� of the NW� of Section 2;
also the N. 34.68 acres of the NE� of the NE'� of Section 3, to rezone from
�
ti) �
Plannin� Cc�aunission Meeting - August 6, 1969 Pa�� 4
�
'
,
'
5.
�
,
,
�
�
�
'
'
M,2 to R-3, �n view of the fact that we recognize that there is a very active
proposal £or this area of open space the Planning Co�nissionccould not in good
judgment change the zoning at this time. The petitioner has related some intor-
mation to us that presumably could affect the decision on the part of the Council
but did not think that the Planning Commission could use it as part of their
judgment. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ��69-21, WALTER E. WITTMAN: South Half of Lot 1, Block 1,
Spring Valley Addition.
Mr. Walter Wittman was present.
The Subcom�ittee at their meeting of July 30, 1969 reco�ended denial of the
lot split request, the prime factor being the fact that the half road was needed
on the South and would not leave enough land to split.
Mr. Wittman said he still would like to get two buildable lots. Referring
to the easement for road, he said there were only two lots in the area that
dedicated the easement. He wondered if he could build on a smaller lot next to
Larsen and have a bigger lot on the S�uth end so that if the easement did go
through, he would still have a good sized lot. He had not talked to Mr. Larsen
about either buying some of his property or selling part of his lot. He checked
the area and found there were homes build on 60 foot lots. If the easement ie a
must, he continued, he would give enough land for easement, but he still wants
two buildable lots.
Mr. Myhra said that those houses built on 60 foot lots were either built
earlier or else built under variances. They could have been built on lots platted
prior to the present ordinance. Mr. Jensen said it is obvious that people ia
this area with very large lots will sameday think in terms of getting rid of
srnne of their property. If we were to start on the end where Mr. Wittman's parcel
is without a street, and then find, in the future, the rest of the people want
to split the back off their lots and dispose of some of their property, we would
not have a road to get to the internal lots.
' Mr. Wittman was informed that if the City decided a street should go through,
then they could condeam. If a 25 foot easement were given, Mr. Wittman would have
a 125'x125' lot. Mr. Wittman did not feel that he could build a house on the
land,without the lot split�which would sell because the neighborhood has smaller
, homes. He felt the kind of house that should be built to conform with the neighbor-
hood, could be put on two lots. He said he could not have a 75 foot corner lot
if he gave 25 feet. He has owned the property for twelve years.
�
�
�
�
u
1�TIOTT by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission concur with
the recommendations by the Subcoumittee to deny the Lot Split, L.S. �69-21,
Walter E. Wittman, of the South Half of Lot 1, Block 1, Spring Valley Addition;
the reasons behind the disapproval involve a 25 foot road easement which is de�med
necessary, thereby yielding a lot which is not suitable to give two buildable
lots, thus there is no logic behind apprw ing the lot split. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
6. VACATION REQUEST: SAV �69-06, LEO 0. LErII�: Vacate 47th Avenue between 3rd Street
and University Avenue (Lot 30, Block 9, Plymouth Addition).
'
'
'
Plann��� Pa����s��cri� �eetin� - Au�ust 6, 1969 , �__� ur�x_ __.w Pa�e 5
Mr. and Mrs. Lemke were present.
Mr. Lemke said he acquired the lot tax forfeit in 1962. He bought it
as a 40 foot lot and found out later it was only 38'� feet. He kept the lot
and paid the taxes. Since �+7th Avenue was closed, he hoped to put a house on
it. The sewer lateral is in the road so the City probably would want to reCain
the easement.
The Engineering Assistant explained that it is a storm sewer located 13
' feet South of the centerline of 47th Avenue. The City's recammendation is
to retain ten feet on either side of the pipe. This would give Mr. Lemke 7
feet more to build on and the rest would be lawn.
'
�II
'
'
'�
'
Il
'
' 7.
'>
�
'
�
�
MiOTION by Mittelstadt, eeconded by Myhra, that the letter from Mr. and Mrs.
Gerald Harwell, 4710 3rd Street Northeast referring to SAV #69-06, Leo 0. Lemlce,
be received. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
The Engineering Assistant said he received a call from Mrs. R. E. Gordon
who said she did not object to the vacation, but did see a dire need for a
walkway to cross the highway to the bus stop. She had talked to the neighbor-
hood and felt there would be quite a few at the meeting.
In the discussion regarding the walkway, the conment was made that because
the party on the north side of 47th Avenue did not respond to the notice mailed
to him, he was not interested in the vacation. In that case, the City could
retain the North Half for possible walkway. Mr. Jensen said the path is well
worn and there is old surfacing on it.
Referring to the alley adjacent to T.H. #47, the Cotmmission felt some
right of way should be maintained to keep access to it.
MpTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Caamission
reco�nend approval of the vacation re.quest, SAV ��69-06, by Leo 0. Lemke, to
vacate 47th Avenue between Third Street and University Avenue, vacating only
the South Half of 47th Avenue and that the petitioner should grant an easemeat
to the City on all but the South 7 feet for utilities. That said vacation
would be only to the West line of the alley and should not be closed off at
this time. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimous�q.
LOT SPLIT R�QUEST: L.S. ��69-20, F'RANK DIRCZ: Cambine 10 feet of Lot 29 with
Lot 30, Block 1, Plymouth Addition.
Mr. Dircz was present.
The Chairman said the action of the Subco�ittee was to recoamend denial
for two reasons, one being the fact that the proposed lot would have on one
side 49th Avenue which is a heavily traveled main artery aifording little
boulevard, therefore the proposed 11 foot setback seemed very inadequate and
that the total of five variances,already granted from the Board of Appeals,
does not seem to meet the intent of the City ordinances designed to prevent
this sort of thing.
Mr. Dircz presented a petition by the adjoining property owners approving
the building of a suitable home to be built on Lot 30. The petition was signed
����
,
'
'
��
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
�
,
'
�
,
'
'
�
`l
l � �
Plann�.�s; �:�.�unni��z.on Meeting - August 6, 1969 W_m,,,,,��__ Page 6
by f�.fteen people general�y in the 4800 block on 3rd Street and some on 49th
Avenue.
M(?TION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Ca�niasion
recei.ve the petition, dated August 5, 1969, refexring to Lot Split, L.S.
��69-20, by �rank Dircz approving the building of a suitable home on Lot 30.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Mittelstadt that the Planning Commission recom�►end approval
of Lot Split request, L.S. ��69-20, by Frank Dircz to combine 10 feet of Lot
29 with Lot 30 and also approve recou�nendations made by the Board of Appeals
to grant the following variances: Section 45.29 reduce lot width from Sq feet
to 45.12 feet; Section 45.29 (2C) distance between living areas from 20 �eet
to 15 feet; Section 45.24 street side corner lot from 17'� feet to 12 feet;
Section 45.28 reduce lot area requirement from 7500 to 5820 square feet;
Section 45.23 sideyard reduced from 10 feet to 5 feet on existing home, to
allow the applicant to split his lot for a saleable home.
The Mi0TI0N FAILED for lack of a second.
Mr. Jensen explained that he did not think it would be appropriate to
grant the proposed lot split with its many variances. The mini�um lot size
is 60 feet. With these numerous variances, the lot is really not suitable
for a single family dwelling. It was his own impression that this lot would
be more suitable purchased by the City or County in all or part for a ro$d
right of way. Thexe is a most serious shortage of right of way in this a�ea.
The boulevard for the lot would be tive feet. Plowing a street with a five
foot right of way is not wide enough, and a sidewalk is needed on that aide
of the street. For children to be walking in such a street is ridiculous.
He thought it would be a far more appropriate thing for the City or County
to acquire part of that lot and Mr. Dircz retain what is deemed necessary.
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Comnission recom-
� ment denial of the lot split request, L.S. �k69-20, Frank Dircz, to combine
10 feet of Lot 29 with Lot 30, Block 1, Plymouth Addition and concur with
the reconaaendations of the Subcom�ittee as follows: 1) The proposed lot
would have on one side 49th Avenue which is a heavily traveled main artery
affording little boulevard, and the proposed 11 foot setback seems very
inadequate. 2) The total of five variances already granted from the Board
of Appeals does not seem to meet the intent of the City ordinances desigAed
to prevent this sort of thing. 3) The City should study this lot as a pos-
sible area to acquire more right of way to, perhaps, provide room for fuCure
� turn lanes and sidewalks. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, except
Mittelstadt who voted nay, the motion carried.
8. CONTINUED LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. 4�69-19, NORTii AIR HOME ASSOCIATION. J. R.
PLEMEL: South 150 feet of Lot 18, Brookvie�a Addition subject to road ease-
ment over South 50 feet.
Mr. Plemel was present.
The Engineering Assistant reported that there was no need for a sewer
easement for this request because the sewer was located about 12 or 15 f�et
onto the property of the Knights of Columbus in Harstad Additi,on.
'
'
'
'
I��
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
�) �
Plaxira�.� �;�a�iss�.c�n Meeting - Au�ust 6,__1969 , �age 7
MOTION by Myhra, seconded by Jensen, that the Planning Commission recqm-
mend appraval of the lot split request, L.S. #69-19, North Air Home Associatioa,
J. R. Plemel of the South 150 feet of Lot 18, Brookview Addition, subject to
road easement over South 50 feet. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the
motion carried unanimously.
9. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ��69-22, RICHARD GJEVRE: Splitting a strip of land
approximately 10 feet wide along the Westerly edge of Lot 4, Block 1, Sand-
hurst Addition for additional yard.
The Engineering Assistant explained that the purpose was to acquire
more yard for Lot 5. Mrs. Lori Rakos, owner of Lot 4, signed the petition,
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commission
reco�end approval of the lot split application �69-22, by Richard Gjevre
which calls for selling a strip of land approximately ten feet wide along
the Westerly edge of Lot 4, Block 1, Sandhurst Addition. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
10. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ��69-15, ARTH[JR DEYS: Lots 3 to 5, Block 7, Hyde Park
Addition. Referred to Planning Conmaission by Board of Appeals at their meet-
ing of July 30, 1969.
' 11.
�
'
,
'
'
'
The Chairman explained that the Board of Appeals requested denial of the
lot split until the old house was torn down and then Mr. Deys return for the
lot split.'
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Mittelstadt, that the Planning Comnission
acknowledge the action o£ the Board of Appeals and table the lot split request,
L.S. #69-15, Arthur Deys, for Lots 3 to 5, Block 7, Hyde Park Addition until
such time as Mr. Deys comes back. The lot split is to be granted at such time
as the new house is built and the old house torn down and the application be
made for the lot split showing that there are no variances other than those
already granted. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unani-
mously.
AMBER OAKS PLAT: To correct platting error, returning "triangle" from Lot 1,
Amber Oaks to Lot 2, Block 2, W�rrel's Addition.
The Engineering Assistant explained that in the Worrel's Addition, part
of Outlot 2, a 50 foot strip out to Stinson Boulevard was proposed for future
street and a radius was included with it. However, in the plat of Amber Oaks,
this street was changed which caused this portion to be part of Lot 1. There-
fore, part of Lot 1, Amber Oaks is actually in front of Lot 2, Block 2, Worrel's
Addition.The owner of Lot 2 in Worrel's Addition is willing to accept a deed
for the amsll triangle which would result in a straight lot line between
adjoining lots.
MOTION by Mittelstadt, seconded by Myhra, that the Planning Commiasioa
has no objections to splitting off the "triangle" from Lot 1, Amber Oaks,
provided a proper lot split application is signed by the petitioner and the
party it is being sold to, being the property lying south of the south line
of Ambe'r Oaks. Upon a voice voie, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
'
'
'
�C� �r
�,lara.��.�aa� ���i���on Meeting - August 6, 1969 F°at�e 8
12.
'
'
�'
'
I1
'
'
,
�
,
'
'
'
l_J
'
'
Mr.Jensen co�ented that nortually the Planaiag Co�naission asks that the
cxiteria for a lot split be a aimple description, but in this case, the plat
has already been filed and tt�e parcel involved is so small, that the
description part of the ordinance should be waived.
MUI.TIPLE I7WELLING STUDY IN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY :
The Engineering Assistant said the data is campleted, but is being
checked and has to be typed. Because there would not be a regular meeting
on August 20, 1969, the Coa�ission would take that time to study the facts
compiled for the Miultiple Dwelling Study.
ADJOURNMENT•
There being no further business, Chairnian Erickson adjourned the
meeting at 10:20 P.M.
R�spect � ly� submitted
� GClv�.�"
Haz 1 O�Brian
Recording Secretary
'
'
'
' 1.
'
BU�I.i3��,'P _, .�.�,I1A�:iy�-I3ESIGN CONTROL SUBCON�ITTEE MINUTES OF r���� ;., �'�9
The meeting was called to order by Chairmaa Erickson at 8:10 P. M.
Z�ERS PRESERr: Erickson, Tormoen, Tonco, Bierman
1�I�BRS ABSBPT : S orns on
OT�RS PRES$NT: Hank Muhich, Building Official
Allen Zeis was present to preaent the request.
�)�
' I�lOTIOi�i by Bierman to recommend approvaZ of the reQueat subject to the folla�ing
stipulatians aad any changes marked in red on the plana. �/
2.
A.)
B.)
C.)
D.)
B.)
F.)
G.)
H.)
I.)
Relocate averhead doors from front to rear. ,
Front entry sidewalk (6' width) from atreet to entry.
Change sideyard aetbacks to 10' on the Porth side and 45' on the South
side (78th Avenue) to allaw for additional blacktop and parking along
78th Avenue. This additioaal area to make up for parking area lost by ^ �
relocating overhead doors. �
5' planting str�p (sod) to divide blacktop area on the south end of
the lot from 78th Avenue.
Blacktop an the south end of the building to extead to frant line of
the building.
�oncrete curb around blacktop parking and drive areas. ,
Saised coctcrete walk along rear liae of the building to act as car stop.
Paint exterior aurfaces of rear and side block �ralls.
Submit new plot plaa incorporating the�e ci►anges.
Secoad�d by Tauco.
wnaaimously.
Upan a voice vote, there being no nays the motion carriad
Mr. Dick Vamaan of Vamnan Conatruction wae preaent to present the reque�t.
After some discussian a 1�►PIOP s�as made by Tonco to reco�oend epproval of tha
request subject to the follaMing stipulationa:
A.) All outaide storage to be within encloaed area.
B.) Coacrete curbing to extead around entire driveway sad parking arsea.
C.) SuDmit curb detail.
D.) All drivewaq antries to include 10' radii.
S.) Sod landacaped portion of property to rear praperty line of ths bui�ding.
Seed the rear araa.
Secoadad by Tormosn. tJpan a voi.ce �vote there baing ao naya the mo�ion cari�i�d
unani�ua ly .
(Lots 26 b 27, Block 2, Commerce Park resoa�d lra� C-1 to Ca-2)
Approwd- 2/14/69 Public Bearing- 3/13/69 Public flaaring - 4/7/69
10� l�ading - 4/21/69
' Bui�t��.c ;-..iu��r�s - Des� n Control Subcommittee of Au usr 7 i.�b°+ Pa e 2
g g a g
' 3� CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO EXISTING SERVICE
STATION LOCATED ON PART OF LOT 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 25, THB SA1� BEING
5696 HACKMANN AVENUE N. E. , FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY PURE OIL COM1'ANY,
'
, .
'
Due to the absence of any representative presenting the request, a MOTION waa
made by Tonco to table the request pending determination of property limits
and possible loop back as being considered by the City.
Seconded by Bierman. Upon a voice vote, there heing no aays, the motion
carried uaanimously.
4. CONSIDERATION OF A�tEQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 294 UPiIT APARTI�NT COMPLBX TO BB �
LOCATED ON LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, BLOCK 2, PEARSON'S 1ST ADDITION, A1�D
' PARCEL 8400, SOUTH � OF SEGTION 3, T. 30, R. 24, ANOKA COUNTY, MII�ESOTA, T�t_
SAI� BEIPG 7805, 7825, 7845, 7855, 7875, 7895 EAST RIVER ROAD, FRID�LEY, _
,
'
�I
I�
�
' S.
'
BY N
A'
Clarence Lowe and Jay Tyson were psesent to present the request.
1C) �. I
After a lengthy discussion regardisg traffic patterns, landscaping, parking,
recreational areas and facilities; it was suggested additional plaas be submitted to
the board at some later date to clarify theae matters along with more detail on
eouadproofing of party wa11s and ceilings between apartment uaits.
Board also suggested the designers discuss different possible means of egress
and exit with the Engineer Department in order to try to minimize the possible
future traffic problems along East River Road.
OF
WAREHOUSE
�s�
No one was preaent to present the request as applicant was unable to aubmit
complete plans in time for the meeting.
' 6. EI�&GBNCY REQUEST TO
TN�t[1 FRTDT.EY TF A(]AR
BE
APPBOVES
r�
.��
' Mias P�,orence Beasesen was present to present the request.
'
'
�
'
TO
Following a atudy of the photographs and letters of tbe applia.ant as �rell as the
photographs and report of the inspection department a 1�TI� was made by Bierman
to recaam�end denial of the request based maialy on the findings of the
inspectian department as well as the age of the dwelling.
Seconded by Tonco. Upon a voice vote, there beiag no aays, tbe motioa carried
unanimouely.
ADJ008i1[�AT :
The meeting was adjourned by Chairmaa Brickson at 11:40 P.M.
Aespe�tfully submitted,
' HAPK 1�IC8
BOILDING 0'�FICIAL
'
�
J
'
'
THE MIN[J'iE3 0�° THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1969
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Mitte�:����� at �o�� �'o1��A
�ERS PRES�TT: Nfittelstadt, Minish, Harris, 0'Ba���e �4none�
OTHERS PRESENT: Clarence Belisle, Building Inspec���
MOTION by Ahonen to approve the minutes of the July 30, 1969 meetin� a€� ��ttene
Seconded by 0'Bannon. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carsied
unanimously.
' 1. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.23 TO REDUCE THE SIDEYARD REQUIREMEI�°r
FiZn�M 1D FF.FT T� 5 FEFT TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTIQN OF ADDITION Ta EXISTYl�
HQIISE LOCATSD ON LOTS 7& 8, BLOCK 3. HAMILTON'S ADDIT�,ON TO MECHANICSVZLLE.
' THE SAME SEING 5614-5TH STREET N.E_� F�Y, NNESOTA. (REQUEST BY 1�IIt.
ROBERT L. OLSON. 361$ MCKINLEY STREET N.E., MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOT�.)_
'
u
'
'
IJ
1
�
��
'�
'
�
Ll
'
Mr. Robert Olsan was present to present his request to the Board. Also present
were the following interested parties: Mr. Gary W. Cheney, 5609-Sth Street N.E.,
Mr. Edward Dupay, 5618-Sth Street N.E., Mr. & Mrs. M. Burton, 5604-5th Street
N.E., Mrs. Amelia Adelmann and Magdalen Adelmann, 5612-5th Street N.E., and Mr.
Charles Marihufuis, 3618 McKinley Street N.E.
Mr. Olson brought with him plans for the proposed addition. He informed the
Board the addition would consist of a living room with bedrooms above. He also
brought with him a letter signed by his adjoining neighbor, Magdalen Adelmann,
stating she did not object to the applicant building the addition within 6 feet
of the property line.
Mrs. Adelmann stated she had signed the letter of no objection, but has since
recansidered and she now objects to the addition coming that close to the
property line.
Mr. Cheaey, living directly across the street, stated that he felt this addition
would enhance the neighborhood and improve the property values.
A len�thlydisc:uasion followed and was centered on room arrangements and if
alternatives such as building to the front or `o the back of the existing
structure would be feasible.
Mr. 0'Bannon had to leave for another �eting at 7;50 P.M.
MOTION by Minish to coatinue the public hearing on this request until the
August 2�, 1969 meeting, to allow the applicaat to conault with his architects
to try and draw up alternate plans that w�ld meet the City Code requirements.
Seconded by Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motioti carried
unanimously.
AD.TOURI�NT :
The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Mittelstadt at 8:35 P.M.
Respectfully au ed, �
i ' �
CE BELISL
Acting Secretary
��fl
fl
FRIDLEY INDUSTRIAL DEVEIAPMENT COr�lISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1969
The Meeting was called to order at 9;30 P.M. by Chairman Hall.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hall, D. Harris, Torrey, Christensen, Zegler
GUESTS PRESENT: Bill 3ensen
Dave Harris presented literature being proposed for City-wide distribution by
Chamber of Commerce. Dis cussion was held with all members in approval aa to
form and conCent.
The anticipated cost of printing and mailing is $500 -$600.
MOTION by ?orrey, seconded by Zegler and carried, that the Industrial
Development Co�ission pay costs of priating and mailing. Unanianoue approval,
since funds are available. The expenditure is proper and co�ission has gone
on record in favor of split liquor for Fridley.
ADJOURNt�➢:III'�:
T6e Meeting was adjouraed at 10:15 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Charles R. Ii�ll
Chairman
,
_ N'i�
I
�
�
'
' .
,
�
, �
'
'
� -_
i
1
�
t
'
'
�
�
I '
� '
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE Eft�CTION, CONSTRUCTION,
REPAIR, ALTERATION, LOCATION, OR MAIN'I'ENANCE OF SIGNS
AND BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, PROVIDING
FOR THE�POSTING OF BONDS, THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS,
INSPECTION:AND FEES, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS,
AND AMENDING THE EXISTING CHAPTER 56 �SIGNS & BILLBOARDS�
FxoM 56.01 TO 56.12 OF 'I'HE CITY CODE.
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 56 by amendi.ng to read a� follows:
�6.01 - Purpose and �ntent
The purpose of this Ordinance is to protect and promote the ge.neral
welfare, health, safety and order within the City of Fridley through the
establishment of a comprehe.nsive and impartial series of standards, regulations
and procedures governing the erection, use and�or displa�r of devices, signs
or symbols serving as a visual commur.icative media to perso.ns situated within
or upon public right-of-wa,ys or properties.
The provisions of this Ordinance are intended to eneourage creativity,
a reasonable degree of freedom of choice, an opportunit�r for effective
communicatio.n, and a sense of co.ncern for the visual ame.nities on the part of
those designing, displaying or otherwise utilizing .needed communicative media
of the types regulated by this Ordinance; while at the same time, assuri.ng that
the,public health and welfare is not endangered. �.
56.02 - Definitions
1. "Accessory Use" means a use which is subordinate to the principle use
being made of a parcel of land. E�amples: identificatio.n signs, off
street parking, off street loading, telephone booths, etc.
2. "Advertising Sign" means a sigr�, generally known as a billboard, which
is used to advertise products, goods, or services which are not related
or incidental to the products, goods, or services on the premises on
which the sign is located.
3. "Address Sign" means identification numbers o.nly,
`in numeric form.
_ _..
whether written_or
4. "Area Ide.ntification Sign" means a f�ee standing sign which identifies
the name of a neighborhood, a residential subdivision, a multiple
residential complex consisting of three (3� or more structures, a
shopping center co.nsisting of three (3� or more separate business
concerns, an industrial area, an office complex consisting of three (3�
or more structures or any combination of the above.
5. "Banners and Pennan-Ls" mean attention getting devices which resemble
flags and are of a.non-permanent paper, cloth or plastic-like consistenc.y.
6. "Bench Sio " means a sign which is affixed to a bench at-a bus stop.
7. "Business Sign" means a si�n relating in its subject matter to the
premises on which it is l.ocated, or to products, accommodations, services
or activities on the premises on which it is located.
-1-
h-y�
i
�
'
��
'
'
�I
�I
'
8. "Church Directional Sign'� means. a sign which bears the address and�or
name of a church and directional arrows pointing to a church location.
9. "Canopy and Marquee" means a rooflike structure projecting over the
entrance to a theater, store, etc.
1.0. "District" refers to a specific zo.ning district as defi.ned in the
Zoning Ordinance.
11. "Free-Standing Sign" means a sign which is placed in the ground and
not affixed to any.part of any structureo
12, "Gover.nmental Sign" means a sign which is erected by a gover.nmental
unit for the purpose of directing or guiding traffic.
13. "Illuminated Sign" means any sign which is illuminated by an
artificial light source. '
1 14, "Information Sign" means any sign giving information, containing no
advertising or company name, to emplo.yees, visitors, or delivery
vehicles. �
'
�
� `
�
�
fI
'
15. "Institutio.nal Sign" means any sign or bulletin board which identifies
the name and other characteristics of a public or private institution
on the site where the sign is located.
16. "Motion Sign" means any sign which revolves, rotates or has any
moving parts.
17. "Nameplate or ldexitification Sign" means a sign which bears the na.me
and�or address of the occupants of the buildi.ng.
18. !'Nonconforming Sign" means a sign which lawfull�r existed prior to the
adoptio.n of this Ordinance but does not conform to the newly enacted
requirements of this Ordinance.
19. "Portable Sign" means a sign so designed as to be movable from one
located to another which is not attached to the ground or any structure.
20. "Porta-panel" refers to a 10' by 20' back to back mobile advertising
device, mounted on wheels and used for commercial as well as civic
promotions. �
2'I. "Private Traffic Directio.na� Szgn." means a sign which is erected on
1 private property by the owner of such property for the purpose of
guiding vehicular and pedestria.n traffic. Such sign bears no
advertising i.nformation.
'
�
i
22. "Projecting Sign" means any sign, alI or any paxt of which extends
over public property more than twelve (12� inches.
23. "Permanent Sign" is a,ny sign which is not a temporary si�;n.
' -2 -
�..��'i
Ii�
'
, .
�
,
'
�
�
�
'
� �-
�
�
�
'
'
'
i
'
'
t•°i �
� `x
24. "Roof Sign" means any sign erected upo.n the roof of a structure to
which it is affixed. �
25. "Roofline" is defined as the top line of the coping; or, when the
buiTding has a pitched roof, as the'intersection of the outside wall
with the roof, �
26. "Sign." means any letter, word or s,ymbol, device, poster, picture,
statuar.y, readi.ng matter or represe.ntation in the nature of an
advertisement, announceme.nt, message, or visual communicatio.n whether
painted, posted, printed, affixed, or constructed, which is displayed
outdoors for i.nformatio.nal or cnmmunicative purposes.
27. "Sign Area" means that area within the marginal lines of the surface
which bears the advertisement, or in the case of inessages, figures,
or symbols attached directly to�any part of a buildi.ng, that area
which is included in the smallest rectangle which can be made to
circumscribe the message, figure or symbol displayed thereon. The
stipulated maximum sign area for a free standing sign refers to a
single faci.ng.
28. "Street Frontage" refers to the proximity of a parcel of land to
one or more streets. An i.nterior lot has one street fro.ntage and a
cor.ner lot has two such frontages.
29. "Temporary Sign" means a sign which is erected or displayed for a
limited perioc� of time. Such temporary signs shall include but not
be limited to those listed in Section 56.03 and Sectio.n 56.05 4 b2,
and pe.nnants, banners, paper and other similar type signs.
30. "Wall Sign" means any sign which is affixed to a wall of any building.
31. "Window Sign" means a sign placed o.n a window, or any sign placed
within a building for the purpose of being visible from the public
right-of-way.
�6.03 - General Provisions Ap licable To All Districts
1. Address Signs
O.ne address sign shall be required per building in all districts.
2. Bench signs shall be permitted onl� at bus stops.
3. Canopies and marquees shall be co.nsidered to be an integral part
' of the structure to which they are an accessory. Signs may be attached
to a canop3r or marquee but such structures shall not be considered
as part of the wall area and thus shall not warrant additional sign
area.
4. Church directio.nal signs shall be permitted in all districts provided
the total area of such signs shall not exceed four (4� square feet
per facing.
-3-
�
'
'
�
�i:) �
5. Construction
All signs shall be co.nstructed in such a manner and of such ma.terial
that they shall be safe and substantial, provided that notiiing in this
Ordinance shall be interpreted as authorizing the erectio.n or construction
of any sign not .now permissible under the Zo.ning or Building Ordinance
of the City.
6. Free Standing Signs
a. Any free standing sign within
, sectio.n of street right of way
shall have a minimum vertical
centerline of the paveme.nt.
'
�
'
' .
�
twenty-five (25� feet of any inter-
lines and�or driveway e.ntrances
clearance of ten (10� feet above the
b. The total sign area of any multi-faced free standing sign shall not
exceed twice the permitted area of a single face sign.
7. General Requirements
a. No sign shall contai.n any indece.nt or offensive picture or writte.n
ma,tter .
b. 1Vo sign other than governme.ntal signs shall be erected or temporarily
placed within any street or public right of way or upon any public
easement.
c. A permit for a sign to be located withi.n 50 feet of any street or
highwa� regulatory or warni.ng sign, of any traffic sign or si�nal,
or of any crossroad or crosswalk, will be issued only if:
' (1� The sign will not interfere witr the ability of drivers and
�pedestrians to see any street or highway sign, or any traffic
. sign or signal, or any crossroad or crosswalk, and;
�!
(2) The sign will not distract dsivers nor offer any confusion to
any street or highway sign, or any traffic sign or signal.'
� d. The issuance of a permit may also be subject to co.nditions in order
to promote a more reaso.nable combinatio.n of signs and to promote
conformity with the character and uses of adjoining property. The
' conditions will be subject to the discretio.n of the Buildi.ng
Inspection Departme.nt.
�
�
�
'
8. Illuminated Signs �
No illuminated sign which changes in either color or intensit.y of
light shall be permitted except one giving public service information
such as time, date, temperature, weather, or similar information.
The City Building Ir�spector in granting permits for illuminated
signs shall specif.y the hours during which the same may be kept
lighted whe.n necessary to prevent the creation of a nuisance. There
shall be no use of revolvino beacons, zip flashers, or similar devices
which cause any of the sources of light to cha.nge in intensity, unless
as noted above.
QS'.
,
, .
'
�
'
�
��
'
'
�
�
'
,
1
'
�
�
�
'
�i�
9, Maintena,nce
a.� The surface and structure of all signs must be kept refinished as
necessary to prevent the sign sizrface from becoming unkempt in
appearance. Whe.n any sign for which a permit is required is removed,
the Building I.nspector shall be notified and the entire sign and
its' components shall be removed,
b, The permit owner shall be responsible for all of the requirements
of this Chapter, i.ncluding the liabilit,y for expe.nse of removal
, and maintenance incurred b.y the Cit,y,
10. Motion signs are permitted o.nly in C-1, C-1S, C-2, and C-2S Districts.
Also the only type of motio.n sign allowed is a revolving sign which
revolves 360' but does not exceed 8 RPM,
11, Portable signs are permitted o.nly in the R-1 District. Portable
private traffic directional signs are permitted in any district,
12o Porta-panels ma,y be used i.n C-1, C-2, C-1S, C-2S, M-1, or M-2 Districts
with a Special Use Permit issued by the Buildi.ng Inspection Departme.nt
for 10 day periods, but limited to three (3) times a year per business.
13o Private traffic directional signs shall not exceed six (6) square
feet in area.
14. Projecting Signs -
No projecting sign shall be permitted in any district,
15, Roof signs are prohibited, except in C-1, C-1S, C-2, C-2S Districtso
The type of_roof signs permitted in the Commercial Districts shall
be parall�el to �he outside wall of the building and project only
f�fteen (15) feet above the roofline of the structure. This additio.nal
height, however, shall not be considered as part of the wall area and �
shall not warrant additio.nal sign area. The supporting members of a
roof sign shall appear to be free of a.ny extra bracing, angle iron,'guy
wires, cables, etc, The supports shall appear to be an architectural
and i.ntegral part of the building, Supporting columns of round, square
or shaped steel members may be erected if required bracing, visible
to the public, is minimized or coveredo
16. Temporary Signs
The following are the
specifically allowecl
only type of temporary signs permitted unless
n the individual zo.ning districts.
a•. Banners, pennants and whirli.ng devices or any such sign resembling
the same are prohibited from use within the City except when used
as an integral part of the design of a building or when used in
conjunction with grand openings �the initial commenceme.nt of
business), or when allowed b.y the provisio.ns of this Ordinance, In.
the case of grand openings, banners and penr_ants shall be allowed
for the week (maximum 10 days� of said grand opening. In other cases
a special permit shall be issued for 10 day periods, but limited to
three (3� times a year per business.
-5-
'
�
' .
'
,
1
�
'
'
'
' .
,
�
0
� i
ii�7
b, Campaign signs posted by a bonafide candidate for political office
or by a person or group promoting a political issue or a political
'candidate ma.y be placed in any district subject to the requirements
oi that districto Such signs shall be removed withi.n seven•(7� days
following the election, A$25.00 deposit shall be received by the
City of Fridley before any signs may be posted. If all the signs
� are removed, the $25,00 will be refunded, but if removal is not
complete, the deposit will be used to defray the costs of removal.
c. One temporar.y identificatio.n sign may be installed upon a construction
site in any district, provided such sign does not exceed eighty 80
square feet in area, .
d. Temporar,_y real estate signs may be erected for the purpose of selling
or promoting a residential project of te.n �10� or more dwelling units
or any non-residential.project provicled:
(1� Such signs sYlall not exceed one hundsed (100� square feet in area,
(2� Only one such sig.n shall be permitted per street frontage upo.n
which the property abutso
(3� Such signs shall be removed whe.n the project is 95� completed,
sold or leased, and
(4� Such signs shall be located no closer than one hundred (100�
feet to any pre-existing reside.nceo
e. Temporar,y signs for the purpose of selling or leasing individual
lots or buildings shall be permit�ed, provided:
(1� Such signs shall not exceed six (6� square feet for residential
property and twent.y-four (24) square feet for non-residential
property.
(2� Only one such sign is permitted per street frontage upon which
the proper-iy abuts, (EXCEPTION: An additio.nal 'ropen house"
sign may be used,� .
�3� Such sign shall be removed within thirty (30) days following
the lease or saleo
17, Wall Si�ns
a, Signs attached to a building wall •ahich exi;e.nd more than forty-
eight (�48� inches from such surface shall be prohibited.
' b, A wall sign or other building facing (which is an integral part
of the structure� may project only four (4� feet above the
roofline of a structureo This additio.nal height, however, shall
1 not be considered as par_t of the wall area and shall not warrant
additio.nal sign area
' (1� Business and advertising signs shall not be painted directly•
to any exterior building surface but sha]_1 be on a separate
frame except for temporary displa�r wiridowsa Sign letters and
'
-6-
LJ
,
'
'
'
symbols may be attached directly to a wall by adhesive or
mechanical means.
(2� Informa.tion signs, containi.ng no advertising, ma,y be pai.nted
directly to the exterior building surface.
�6004 - Special Regulation: Advertising Signs
10 Advertising wall signs shall be permitted only in the C-2 a,nd C-2S
Commercial Districts according to the requireme.nts set forth for those
districts,
•, 2, Free standing advertising signs shall be permitted in only the C-2S,
M-1 and M-2 Districts, but only after securing a Special Use Permit,
' The followi.ng conditions shall be considered as the minimum standaxds
' . for free standing advertising signs, but the City still may impose
additional co.nditions,
'
�
�i�
�
a, Maximum Hei�ht: Twenty-Five (25� feet above lot grade, unless the
sign is intended to be viewed from a highwa�, then the 25 foot
maximum height will be computed from the centerline of the traveled
highway, but i.n no case, shall the vertical distance between the
bottom of the sign and the ground be reduced to less than ten (1U)
feet. _ _ _ _ _ _
b, Maximum Sign Area: Three hundred (300� sc�uare feet per facing and
��� not to exceed two (2� facings. Double. faced signs shall 'oe attached
back to back.
�
�
�
�
�
,
'
'
'
co Minimum Distance Between Si�ns: Five hundred (500) feet.
d. Minimum Setback From Street Right of Wa,y Lines: Thirty �30� feet.
eq Distance From Street Intersectio.ns: Not closer than five �undred
500 feet to the intersectio.n of two or more streets or highways,
such distance bei.ng measured from the i.ntersection of street or
highwa.y centerlines.
fa Proximit, to Uses Permitted in Residential Areas: Not closer than
five hundred 500 feet to any re.side.ntial district or any park or
playground,
g, Sign Structure Specifications: The structure shall be all metal,
The metal shall be either painted or treated to prevent deterioratio.n,
Lack of proper maintenance shall be cause for revocatio.n of the
Special Use Permit.
-7-
0
'
' • �6.05 - District Regulations �
In addition to those signs permitted in all districts, the followi.ng signs
, axe permitted in each specifxc district and shall be regulated as to size,
locatio.n and character according to the requirements herein set forth:
'
'
LJ
'
10 R-1, R-2, R-2A Residential Districts
a. Name late Si s: One sign for each dwelling unit, .not greater than
two 2 square feet in area, indicati.ng the name and�or address of
the occupant. .
b. Institutional and Recreational Signs: One sign or bulletin.
board per street frontage for a church, a public institutio.nal
use, or a recreational use in the R-1, R-2 and R-2A Districts.
Such sign or bulletin board shall not exceed twenty-four (24�
square feet i.n area nor shall it be placed closer than te.n (10�
feet to any street right of way lineo
c. Area Identification Sig.is: One sign per development not to exceed
twenty-four 24 square feet in area,
d, Temporar,y Signs: Refer to Section 56,03, No. 16,
' � e. Maximum Height of Free Standing Signs: Six (6� feet above the
lot grade, _.
, -_
,
f. Minimum Setback: No part of a si�n. shall be within ten (10� feet
of any property linea (EXCEPTION: Nameplate sign ma.y be pl.aced
anywhere on the owners property,)
2. Multiple Residential Districts R-3, R-3A and R-4
, � a, Identificatio.n Signs: One identificatio.n sign or symbol per
buildi.ng .not greater than six (6) square feet in area, provided
such sign is attached f`lat against a wall of the building.
'
lJ
b, Area Identification Signs: One area identification sign per
development, providing such sign does not exceed twenty-four (24�
square feet in area, and further provided, such sign is placed .no
closer than ten (10) feet to any street right of way.
c. Institutional Signs: O.ne sign per street fro.ntage identifyi.ng
, an i.nstitutional complex within a multiple residential district
(convalescent, nursing, rest or boardi.ng care homes, or mobile
home complex.� Such sign shall not exceed twenty-four (24� square
, feet in area nor shall it be placed closer than te.n (10� feet to
any street right of way li.ne,
,
'
d. Business Signs: Signs identifying uses accessory to a multiple
residential development shall not be yisible from the public
right of waya
,
-8-
�+}i�r,
O
' � _
'�
LJ
'
'
'
C_�
'
':_
'
�
�
,
�
,
'
�
�
�j �
eo Temporary Signs: Refer to Sectio.n 56.03, No, 16
fo Maximum Height of Free Standing Signs: Six (6� feet above the
lot grade,
go. Minimum Setback: No part of a sign shall be within ten (10�
feet of a.ny property line.
h, Private Traffic Directional Signs: Refer to Section 56.03, Noa 11
and No. 13,
3, Commercial Districts C-1, C-2, C-1S, C-2S
a. Wall Signs and Roof Signs: The total area of all wall signs
affixed to a building wall and all roof signs pasallel to a specified
wall shall not exceed 15 f of the total area of that wall, However,
the maximum size of an� roof sign is 80 square feet. The use of a
roof sign will substitute for a free standing business sign along
the fro.ntage it faces. -
b. Free Standing Signs: O.ne free standing sign for each building
per street frontage, The total area of a free standing sign
for a building having one street frontage shall not exceed _
eighty (80) square feet in Commercial District C-1 and C-1S, nor
shall it exceed one hundred (100� square feet in Commercial District
C-2 and C-2S. Where a building has two or more street fro.ntages,
o.nly one free standi.ng sign of the above size shall be permitted.
Each permitted free standing sign in excess of o.ne shall be no
greater i.n area than one-half (2� the area of the first sign. The
ma,ximum height of free standing sig�ns shall be twent�r-five (25�
feeto
co Area Identificatio.n Si s: -One sign per developme.nt not to exceed
one hundred 100 square feet in ar_eaa
do Temporar,y Si�ns: Refer to Sectio.n 56,03, No, 16.
ea Private Traffic Ilixectional Signs: Refer to Section 56.03,
Noo 11 and Noo 13.
f, Exceptions: Offices and medical and dental clinics i.n a
commercial district shall comply with Sectio.n 56.05, E, '�Medical
and Oifice Building District".
g. Minimum Setback: No part of a sign shall be withi.n ten �10�
feet of any property lineo
4, Automobile Service Area means gas stations, drive-i.n restaurants,
drive-in theaters, etc.; or an�r other t�rpe of business where an
automobile is used as the recipient of the service or product or where
an automobile is .necessary to obtain or to make use of tYie service or
product,
-9-
,
' �
, .
,
'
C�
a. Wall Signs and Roof Signs: �The total area of all wall signs
affixed to a building wall and all roof signs parallel to a
specified wall shall not exceed 15� of the total area of that
wall. However, the maximum size of any roof sign is 80 square
feet. The use of a roof sign will substitute for a free standing
business sign along the frontage it faces,
b, Free Standi.ng Signs:
�1� One free standing sign per princip le building per street
frontage, The total area of a free standing sign for a
building having one street frontage shall not exceed eighty
(80� square feet. Where a building has two or more street
frontages, only one (1� free standing sign of the above size
shall be permitted, Each permitted �ree standing sign in
excess of one shall have a sign area not to exceed fift.y (50)
square feet. The maximum height of free standing signs shall
be �wenty-five (25) feet,
(2� Temporary product sale, stamp and game signs ma,y occupy the
' , remainder of that area not utilized for the permanent free
standing brand si�n., provided the total area of all permanent
and temporary signs does not exceed eighty (80� square feet
' , for one sign and fifty (50� square feet for each sign in
excess of one. Also; the maximum total area for temporary
signs is twenty (20� square feeto _.
' -_
'
'
'
,
�
�
'
'
�J
c, Pump Signs: Lettering or symbols which axe a.n integral part of
the design of a gasoline pump shall be permitted.
do Private Traffic Directio.nal Signs: Refer to Section 56.03, No. 11
and No. 13.
eo Temporar,y Si�ns: Refer to Section 56.03, No. 16.
f. Restroom Sig,-n.s: Signs indicati.ng the locatio.n of restrooms
and containing no advertising informatio.n shall be permitted as
needed.
5. Medical and Office Building District CR-1 and CR-2
ao Identification Signs: One sign per street frontage, provided such
signs.do not exceed thirty-six (36� square feet in area,
b, Business Signs: One identification wall sign per accessory use
attached to the facing of the building at the ground floor level.
The total area of all wall signs shall not exceed fifteen per cent
(15�� of the ground floor wall facing of the accessory use.
c, Area Identification Signs: One sign per development, not to exceed
thirty-six 36 square feet in area, • .
-10-
,
�
t
' .
C�
'
'
,
;�
L_J
'
'�
I��
�
,
I�''
�
,
'
�_1
�
11. Maximum Height of Free Standing Signs: Six (6� feet above lot
. grade, �
e. Temporar.y Signs: Refer to Section 56.03, No 16,
f.. Private Traffic Directional Signs: Refer to Section 56.03, Idoo 11
and Noo 13,
g. Minimum Setback: No part of a sign shall be within ten (10� feet
of any property line. (EXCEPTION: Twenty (20� feet from front
lot line when located within twenty (20� feet of a driveway.�
6, Heav.y and Light Industrial Districts M-1 and M-2
a, Ide.ntification Sigris: One ide.ntification sign per street frmntage
not to exceed eighty (80� square feet in areao One (1� additio.nal
wall identification sign for each tenant having a private entry to
a multi=tenant building; a.nd the total area of such signs being
displayed at or near the te.nant's entrance, shall not exceed ten
per cent (10�) of the area of the wall to which it is affixed,
b, Area Identification Si �n.�s: One sign per development not to�exceed
eighty 80� square feet in area.
c. Temporar,y Signs: Refer to Sectio.n 56.03, No. 16.
d, Maximum Height of Free Standing Signs: Twenty five (25� feet
above lot gradeo
e. Private Traffic Directio.nal Signs: Refer to Section 56.03, No. 11
and No, 13.
f; Minimum Setback: No part of a sign shall be within ten (10� feet .
of any property line,
7o P and PD Districts: Sign requirements i.n P and PD areas would be
controlled by the Council whe.n the development is planned.
56.06 - Administration
Permits: Before a sign ma,y be displa�red in the City of Fridley, the owner
of the premises on which the sign is located shall file applicatio.n with the
City Building Inspection Department for permissio.n to display such sign. Permits
are required for all existing, new, relocated, modified or redesigned signs
except those specifically exempt under Section 56.07, No.1,
1. Permit Application: Application for permits shall be made upon blanks
provided by the Building Inspector and shall state or have attached
thereto, the following information:
-11-
r� �
C�.t,
�
' .
�
�J
�
_ao Name, address and telepho.ne number of applicanto
b. Location of building, structure, or lot to which or upon which
the sign is to be attached or erected.
Pj j
c. Positio.n of the sign or other advertising structures in relation
� to the nearest buildi.ngs, structures, public streets, right of ways
and property lines, The drawing showing such position shall be
prepared "to scale",
,
�
'
�
�
' —
'
'
'
'
'
t�
�
�
'
d. Two (2) blueprints or ink drawings of the plans and specificatio.ns
and method of construction or attachment to the building or in the
ground including all dimensions. Locating all light sources,
wattage, type and color of lights, and de�tails of any light shields
or shades.
e. Copy of stress sheets and calculatio.ns showing the structure:; is
designated for dead load and wind velocit�r in the amount required .
by this and all other Ordinances of the City if required by the
Building Inspection Department.
fo Name of perso.n, firm, corporation, or associatio.n erecting the
structure.
g. Any electrical permit required for an.y sign.
h. AN AGREIIKII�IT WITH THE CITY:
(1) Which would authorize and direct the City of Fridley to
remove and dispose of any signs and sign structure o.n which
a permit has been issued but which was not renewed, if the
owner does not remove the same withi.n a thirty (30� day
period following the expiratio.n of the permit. .
(2� Which would authorize and direct the Cit.y of Fridley to ,
remove the sign and sign structure, at the expense of the
applicant, where mainte.nance is required and the mai.ntenance
is not fur.nished, but o.nly after a hearing and after a
notice of sixty (60� days specifyi.ng the maintenance
required by the City,
i. If a sign authorized by permit has not been installed within
ninety (90� days after the date af issuarce of said permit, the
permit shall become null and void unless an extensio.n is granted
by the Building Inspection Department.
jo The Building Inspection Department may require other information
concerni.ng safetyo
2. Fees: Permit fees for signs shall be:
a, For signs forty (40� squ�.re feet or less an initial fee of
$10,00
-12-
t
'� b. For signs�larger than forty (40) square feet the initial fee
. shall be $25.00 plus 25 cents per square foot of the sign surface
exceeding 100 square feeto �
�
LJ
�
co An annual fee for advertisi.ng signs, of $5.00 plus 10 cents�per
square foot of the sign surface exceeding 100 square f�et shall
be chaxged,
The annual fee shall not be charged for business signs attached
directly on a building which identify the activity or advertise
products sold or services provided in that building. An annual
fee will be due on April 30 of each yearo
. d. Ido fees are required for the no.n-permit sig:ns provided for in
' Section 56007, No, 1, and may be waived for religious, civic,
school and public interests.
�
'
ll
� �
'
�
'
'
'
'
r-,
�
'
'
e. For banners, pennants and whirling devices and porta panels or
any such sign resembling the same, a special fee of �5000 is
required for each ten (10� day period or lesso
3. Licenses and Bo.nds: No person, firm or corporatio.n shall e.ngage in
the business of erecting signs under this Ordinance unless licensed
to do so by the Cit� Council. Such license may be granted by the
City Council after written applicatio.n to the City Clerk, accompanied
by an annual license fee of $25000 and it may be terminated at an�r
time for ca�se. The license shall expire o.n December 31st in the
year of issuance and each yeax thereafter. No lice.nse shall take
effect until the licensees shall file with the City Clerk a corporate
surety bo.nd in the sum of $1,000,00, conditio.ned that the lice.nsees
shall conform to all of the provisio.ns of this chapter and indemnify
and hold the City, its officers and age.nts, harmless from and damage
or claim resulting from or related to the erectio.n or maintenance of
any sign in the Cit,y by the licenseea
A license and bond shall not be required of an applicant, who is not
eragaged in the business of erecting signs, and who chooses to
construct and erect his own sign o.n his pro�erty. ' •
56.07 - Ehforcement
lo Exemptions: The exemptions permitted by this Sectio.n shall apply only
to the requirement of a permit and�or fee, and shall not be construed
as relieving the installer of the sign, or the owner of the propert�r
upo.n which the sign is located, from conformi.ng with the other
provisions of this Ordinance..
ao Temporary signs erected by a non-profit organization are not
exempt from obtaining a permit for signs, but the City does waive
the fee requirement.
bo No permit is required under this Section for the following signs:
-�3-
�� i.
�
' ' _ _
'
'
�1, j
(1} A window sign not exceeding tnirt.y per ce.nt (30f� of the
window area,
(2� Signs having an area of six (6� square £eet or less.
(3� Signs erected by a governmental unit or public school
district.
(4� Temporary signs as listed in Section 56.03, No. 16.
'
(5� Memorial signs or tablets containing the name of the buildi.ng,
� its use and date of erection when cut or built into the walls
of the building and co.nstructed of bronze, brass, sto.ne or
ma,rble ,
'
'
�
' `
'
��',
�
'
'
C
LJ
'
(6� Signs which are completely within a building and ase not
visible from the outside of said buildingo
2o Violatio.ns and Fines: If the City Buildi.ng Inspector or his agent
shall find that any sign regulated by this Ordinance is unsafe, insecure,
or is a menace to the public; or has been co.nstructed or erected without
a permit first being granted to the owner of the propert,y upon which
• said sign has bee.n erected, or is improperly mai.ntained, or is in
violatio.n of any other provisions of this Ordinance, he sliall give
written notice of such violation to the owner or permitee thereof.
If the owner fails to remove or alter the sign so as to comply with
the provisio.ns set forth in this Ordinance withi.n ten (10) ca,le.ndar
days following receipt of said notice, such signs may be removed by
the City, the cost incident thereto being levied as a special
assessment against the property upon which the sign is located,
Any perso.n, organization, corporation or their representatives found
in violation of this Ordinance �hall be guilty of a misdemeanoro
Upon conviction, a fine of not more than $100000 shall be imposed for
each day the violation remains in exis-�ence. Al1 signs are subject to
such penalty for violatic�n of �he requirements of the district withi.n
which they are located even though the.y may not be required by
Ordinance to pay a fee.or acquire a permit.
3o Appeals:
a. To provide for a reaso.nable interpretation of the provisions of
this Ordinance, a permit applicant who wishes to appeal an
interpretation by the City Building Inspector or his agent may
file a notice of appeals with the City Engineer and request a
hearing before the Board�of Appealso
The Board shall hear the appeal and make their recommendation to
the City Council, appeals or requests in the following cases:
(1) Appeals where it is alleged that there is an error in any
order, requirement, decision or determination m�.de by the
administrative officer in the eriforcement of this Ordinance,
-�4-
'
C
�I
�
�
'
�
'
C'��;
�
' (2) Requests for variances from the literal provisio.ns of this
• Ordinance in i.nstances where their strict enforcement would
cause an undue hardshipa •
�
'�
�
'
�
b, Before the Board shall grant a variance, it is the responsibili�y
� of the applicant to prove:
(1) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property or to the inte.nded use that do
not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity
and zoning district;
(2) That the variance is .necessar�r for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity anc� zone; but which is de.nied
to the property in question;
(3) That the strict application of the ordinance would co.nstitu�e
unnecessary hardship; and
(4� That the granting of the variance would .not be materiall�
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property
or improveme.nts i.n such vicinit�r or zo.ne in which the property
is located,
56.08 - Non-conforming Signs
�
1. Any non-conforming temporary or portable sign existing at the time of
adoptio.n of this Ordinance shall be made to compl� with the requirements
set forth herein or shall be removed withi.n sixty (60� days after the
adoptio.n.of this Ordinance.
2. Non-conforming permanent business signs lawfully existing at the time �
of adoption of this Ordinance shall be allowed to co.ntinue in use, but
shall not be rebuilt, altered other than to change the message, or .
relocated witi�out being brought i.nto compliance with the requireme.nts
of this Ordin.ance. After a non-conforming sign has been removed, it
shall not be replaced by another non-conforming sign.
' 3. Non-conforming advertisi.ng signs existing o.n the effective date of this
Ordinance shall become non-co.nforming uses and shall be discontinued
within the following period of amortization of the sign; unless the
' , required Special Use Permit is obtaineda The period of amortizatio.n
for signs shall �e not more than:
'
,
ao Free standin� and wall signs: Five (5) years from the effective
date of this Ordinance,
b. Signs painted directl.y o.n building facings: Three (3� years
from the effective date of this Ordinance.
4. Whenever a.non-conforming permanent sign use has been disco.ntinued
' for a period of three (3� months, such use shall not thereafter be
continued unless in conformance with the provzsions of tnzs
Ordinance.
�
-�5-
.
_ �3`;
�6,09 - Severance Clause
Tf any Section, clause or provisio.n or �ortio.n thereof of this Ordinance
sYiall be found to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
juxisdiction, such decisio.n shall not affect any other section, clause, provision
or portion thereof of this Ordi.nanceo
,�6010 - Repeal_
Any portion of the Fridley City Code inconsiste.nt with this Chapter is
hereby repealedo �
0
e
-16-
�
0
��
�
i�
'
�
'
CITY OF PRIDLEY
MINNE30TA
P'i�AIiNING AND ZONING FORM
lhaber
Tast Resich Est e, I .
I1pPLICANT' S SIGNATURE J1Li _J
Address 7620 Univer�ity Ava
Telephone Nuiaber 786-6222
' East Ranch Estatea .
PBOPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE '
' Addse�� 7620 University Ave
Telephoae N�ber 786-6222
' '
'
�
'
'
�
u
I
,
�
'
t���
TYlB dF itLQUEST
_Rssoniag
__Special Uae pertit
�,_V�rianc•
Lot Splits
Approval of Pre-
lioinary Ylat
Approval of �iaal
Plat
i,_Streets os wl].�-.._.
V�catioy
___.�__� Q. �..5.
Stse�t Location of Prop�rty 6510 - 6530 Eastj¢ River Road
I.�gal Da�cription of Property see proposed form
Pr��eat Zonia� Cla�sificatioa Comme�cial
Sxiatin= Ui� of the Property car watsh and auperette .
__._.__ .r._____.
propoaed Zoainf Cla�si#icatioa, Special Use, Variance or other r�quest
no c an�e reauested
Deacribe bziefly the 1yp� of Ua• and the Impsov�eat Proposed
..�_..��.
�cr�ai� of Propesty
9a� tM Pr�srrat Applicaat Pr�viously Sought to R�soae, Ylat, Obtaia a Lot Split�
Obtaia a Variaace or Special Use Permit on the Subj�ct Site or Part of It?��
iihen?
What Maa ��queated Fee Enclosad $
�Dat� i�il�d Date of �N�rinQ
, ...._.._..._
' .
.
'
'
PLANNINr AI� 201ViNG FORM
Number
�AGE 2
.
TM uadexsigaed underetands that: (a) A list of all residents and o�wners of pro-
' perty within 300 feet must be atteched to
this application.
(b) This applicaCion m�st be •igned by all
, owners of thz property, or an explanatioa
�iven why this is not the case.
. (c) Responsibility for any defect in the pro-
ceedings resul.ting from the failure to liet
' the names and addresaes of all regideats
t�nd property owr�er� of property Nithin 300
feet of the prop�rty in question, belon6s
' to the undersi�ned.
Aesidents and OWners of �roperty within 300 feet:�
PERSON5 ADDRESS
'
�9 �
�
0
,
'
'
�
'
'
�I
I _J
,
'
'
'
�-+��.
A eketch of propoaed property and stzucture muat be dra��n on the back of this
fotm or attached, showing the following; 1. .lotth Direction
Z. Location of Proposed Structuse on lot.
3. Dimenaions of property� proposed
structurp, and front and side set-becks.
. . 4. Street Names
5. Location snd use of sdjacent existing
� buildings (within 300 ieet).
The undersigned hereby declarea that all the facts and representation� aCated iA
tbi• applicatioa are true and correct. R�� st e s� Ine.
i '
a►a Au��� �_ 19s9 _ atc-w+rcnue ��' ��,�.
(APPLICANT �
. . � ._ . . . .,.
� * �k �k ,k ,k ,k '1k �k +k� .
Approved Deaied By the 3o8ad o� Otppe6=s
Subject.to the Followin� Conditions; date
Approved Denied by the Plannin� Commisaion on
8ubject to the $,ollowing Conditions; d�te
Approved Denied by the Council on
Subject to the Followiag Conditions: � date
. ,
' Form PC 100
:
• o�����/
e� (�� �(p� �
/
':\1 S11 L
II j \ \
t�` �
� �I1 O N.
� ' �r � ,,,� �.
,�� t 1;� 2���
1�� �, ,
,
�� � � \l
���'�; i
T-1 i
� `
` 1 I
'I � �� �
,
,` �
1 �� � i
'N ' `�� ``ti ? �
� � �,1 �
, ,
. ' � i
'I � i
� � i
i
� ��
� � � z
f ,, �M
� I ' �• � � �W v
' ' ' i. U� Z
'' ( I � 1
i
� ;j i
� � i
^ ;
� `� �
� I '
� ' � � I
�� �� ►
. �� � �
I '
' '
, I
�) �
1 ' I
1 I
� , ' � �
ANOKl� COUNTY , MINNESOTA
� �
\ �,o �
. \ �
,
��
� ,,
,� ,� .
�o � .
e� � •
�
� ,�:
v\
�
.�
�c�1 Q tio �
h �'�
.�-
�
�a
; �_
.�
.� �,�
-35 � .
e1 �.�, t\°%Z%
s
�
.y
C`
s, U
�c
\
`
`
�\ I/
% /,a O • , ,��
� 1 . �5 � . .
1 ��J ��
, ��
1'
�
- - ��!�
�
�
�
,\
\
\
i
�
�\ .
'S�
\ ��..
� A�. •.
00 �� �..,
� •� �,�
� \
�
,
�
`\
;
� ��.
c \.�i�
�
��
�\
.• �, �.
. Z'3 �i�i �' �
c �
a.-�-����9 � 6 .� 3 �
� - �.
.ti5 � S
a�° "%
0
y���
A�� 7, 1969
City Council
Fridley, Minnesota
Re: To property in name of June M. Ulberg
Rev. Aud. Sub. #?7
. #2560 Part of Lot 22
Approval to build on the subject property Was given in 1965 but
in order to do so axi e�,sement was necessary. This easement is
now available and we w�uld like approval from the City Council
to proceed.
• Respectively, .
. ��� .-� `
� ��. �Cl�
� ` ��J.une M. Ulberg
7035 E. River Rd. N.E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55�32
, '
' • . 1
- /
,
' �
'
- �" I G �;��;� f �' `7,
., ,-__.
� S=�-= �
��-____
('r`d, � � / 3B
�,.r
/ �I�
�' ____ _ .. �
���
�- 8s
Topog: Preliminary Plat ��r�
P.S. ��64-17 ` '`'
R. C. Ulberg
Parts of Lots 22 & 22,
�.5. ����
-- __.,�,
� '.� f ; .1 !':-
� __
, �
� �� �-� � � ,
, ; .,
� :.
� �o� � �
_ .,
/ _ ____ . _ _ r`F, ,� Y ,�}
' . ' t � '
__��_'—�'-- �-------
� /�'
_ _...
I�--- „� -
1 �
�
0
.
,-___�_ _.. �
.�__i� �- , .
--._...�..�_ . ...__. _,.;;.rIF� --�—i,.�.�.�!__. �±
._
.. ... _.. _ ....__ - �J� �s
Z2If. �
!
(//G�,-�� ,� /
� / _ '-_ _ � rt:- _ ;� � � _1,, .
----� —�-�:: ----• —t--_.k. ��_1
� � s__ L � ;� � � , �-.
. �� _ ' � � ��
� �` 40' �'
� � �
--�� � � ? � ��
' _ �7 ,''; '�`'- r ► n � � 1, �. • � /�
,� / l i 'y�� l't I' 1'�i
— __�__��._.� �
��
' . �, _
� �i
' � - v � .
� �
1
, � � - .
�
' °� .
v
�
' • ' � .
�
I ' � ��/�!`.? ��r.; ,'/; A..�-�,f -�� � .
t/'.�i': f �; � ��] : . .
. �' r,' .
� �e�o r�c��e
� � �
ANOKA COUNTY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE
MEMO TO: CITY COUNCIL
MEMO FROM: CITY MANAGER
MEMO DATE: AUGUST 14� 1969
560-3450 ���`3
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55421
The City Manager and Finance Dixector met with the Anoka County
Administrator and as a result, the attached revised Agreement on Court
5pace lease was drafted. The Administrator is presenting it to the County
Commissioners for approval.
Council approval of the draft agreement is requested.
As added information, the following data is provided:
COMPARISON - INCOME FROM COURT
1968 (City� 1969 (Countyl
January $1,349 $ 598.80
February 1,235 1�324,50
March 1,522 1�421�20
April 1,764 1+055,50
May � 2,227 2,534.52
June 1,642 1,824.50
TOTAL $9,739 $8,759.02
Although revenues show a decrease of $979.98 in compaari,son to a like
period since the County took over, an expense must be deducted fram City
Revenue in 1968. The revenue figure indicated above for 1968 must be o�fset
by City Court expense of which for salaries alone was $12,000 for the fi:xst
six.months of 1968.
'''/y� ,� G ��',.,..-i�+-d----�,..---�--....--
i� "�'�'_4.�f.�l.� � .
Homer R. Ankrum
'
D R A F T
' • L E A S E
�
�.J
THIS AGREEMENT made this day of June, 1969, by and between the City of
Fridley, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
of Minnesota, hereinafter called the Lessor, and the County of Anoka, a body politic
� and corporate of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the Lessee,
'
�
'
�
WITNESSETH: That the Lessor does hereby demise and let unto the Lessee the
following described premises;
1. AREA AND PURPOSE: That portion of the Fridley Municipal Building as
iadicated in Item 4 below. The area hereby demised and let unto the Lessee amouats
to 2469 square feet and will be used for the pur.poses of an Anoka County Municipal
Courtroom, Judge's Chamber, jury deliberation room, and for other related Municipal
Court functions.
� 2. TERM: The Lessee is to have and to hold the above described premises for
a term of one year beginning on the lst day of July, 1969, and ending on the 30th
' day of June, 1970.
'��4
N 1j`
It is mutually agreed that the Lessee will pay for the space occupied commencing
' on September 1, 1968, and through June 30, 1969, on the same basis as the terms of
'
�
,
'
�J
this Lease.
3. EXTENSION OF TERM, ANNUAL RENEWAL: The original term of this Lease Agreement
being for a term of one year as specified above, it is understood between the parties
hereto.that in the event the Lessee desires to renew or Lessor desires not to renew
this Lease for additional one year periods, either may do so by notifying the other
in writing thirty (30) days prior to the termination of this Lease Agreement of its
intention to extend or not extend. Such written notice shall be by certified mail
addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley, City Hall, Fridley, Minnesota
if for Lessor, and County Board, County Court House, Anoka, Minnesota if for Lessee.
J
LEASE - PAGE 2
4. RENTAL: The Lessee shall pay to the Lessor the sum annually of $4.00
per square foot based on the degree of occupancy of the described premises, which
is agreed to be as follows;
Area
Court Room
Detention Room
Jury Room
Clerk's Room
Judge's Chambers
S�uare Feet
1739
59
275
151
245 �
2469
% Use
40
100
100
100
100
Est. Cost @ $4.00
$ 2782.00
23b.00
1100.00
604.00
980.00
$ 5702.00
In no event shaZl the anaual rent hereunder be less than $5,702. The Lessee
shall pay such rent in advance annually or in monthly installments at the option
of the Lessee and the Lessor agrees that it will file the required claim against
the Lessee for the payment of such rent as provided in Minnesota Statutes 471.38.
5. AGREEMENT WITH RE9PECT TO OFFICE FURNITURE AND EQUIP'MENT: It is agreed that
the Lessee will pay to the Lessor an amount equal to the value of office furniture
and equipment furnished by the Lessor on the basis of original cost of the items
provided.
6. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY LESSOR: The Lessor hereby agrees to furnish,
for the term of this agreement and as a part of the consideration for this agreement,
the following;
•1: All electric power, telephone outlets, heat, and sewer and water
facilities which are required by the Lessee.
2.. All custodial services necessary to the upkeep of the demised area;
including towels, light bulbs, janitorial supplies and all other
necessary items.
3. All maintenance and upkeep of the grounds, parking lot, drjveways
and walks adjacent to the Municipal Building.
`/�
�
'
'�
�I
'
'
'�
'
'
u
'"_
.: �,
�
LEASE - PAGE 3
0
4. All maintenance and repair of the building, corridors, stairs, rai��ngs.
' windows and all appurtenances �o any of the aforementioned, except
repairs occassioned or required as a result of negligence of the Les�see
.or its agents and employees.
5. Public liability insurance in the amounts of $100,000.00 -$300,000.00
limits with the Lessee as a named insured or co-insured on said policy.
The certificate of insurance naming the Lessee as an insured or co-
insured shall be furnished to the Lessee within a reasonable time after
the execution of this Agreement.
6. AI1 off-street parking facilities now or hereafter provided in conjunction
with the Municipal Building is to be available to Lessee equally with
other public and private users.
My changes in services resulting in a reduced or increased cost, or any
services added or eliminated, shall be provided by Lessor at the request of the Lessee
at the expense of the Lessee, and an adjustment for increased or reduced continuing
costs shall be made in the rental set forth in paragraph 4 of this Agree�nent. The
initial expense of such change in services shall be the actual cost and the con-
tinuing expense shall be agreed upon as to amount prior to change, installation
' or removal.
'
�
'
�
I_I
'
L_I
'
7. JOINT USE OF FACILITIES: The Lessor shall have the right to use the Court-
Council room for general meetings of various bodies without interference from the
Lessee, except during scheduled court hours. Use of the courtroom space during other
than normal court hours may be reserved by the court through the City Manager's Office.
Either party may use such roo� or other roo:ns covered by Item 4 which do not
prov�de 100% court use when such space is not scheduled far use by the other, and
Lessor may assign use therefor by other persons and groups when such rooms are
not scheduled for use by the Lessee.
8. DAMAGE TO THE BUILDING: It is further agreed between the Lessor and the
Lessee that if during the term of this Lease the demised premises or the i.mprovements
thereon shall be injured or destroyed by fire or the elements, or through any other
'
�
,
'
'
'-
'
'
'
'"
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
'
LEASE - PAG� 4
cauae, so as to render the demised premises unfit for occupancy, or unfit for the
conduct of the uses and purposes of th� Lessee as hereinbefore set forth, or to
such an extent that they cannot be repaired with reasonable diligence within 90 days
from the happening of such injury, then the Lessee may terminate this Lease from the
date of such damage or destruction, and shall immediately surrender the demised
premises and all interest therein to the Lessor and shall pay rent only to the time
of such surrender. But if the demised premises can be restored within 90 days from
the happening of the injury thereto, the Lessor shall immediately commence such
reconstruction and repair as is necessary to restore the premises to its pre-
existing condition and this Lease shall not end or terminate on account of such
injury by fire or otherwi.se. The rent shall not run or accrue after the injury and
during the process of repairs, and up to the time when the repairs shall be completed,
except only that the Lessee shall during such time, pay a pio rata portion of such
rent apportioned to the demised premises which are in condition for occupancy or
which may be actually occupied during such repairing period. If, however, the
. �
demised premises shall be so slightly injured by any cause aforesaid, as not to be
rendered unfit for occupancy, then the Lessor shall repair the same with reasonable
promptness, and in that case the rent shall not cesse or be abated during such
repairing period. All improvements or bettercnents placed by the Lessee or the
Lessor on the demised premises shall,�however, in any event, be repaired and replaced
by the Lessee at its own expense and not at the expense of the Lessor and at the
termination of this Lease all changes, improvements or alterations to the building
shall become or remain the property of the Lessor at the option of the Lessor or at
the termination of the lease lessee shall remove such improvements or alterations
and restore to pre existing condition on the option of the lessor all furniture or
fixtures not physically.attached to the building which the Lessor has acquired for
or sold to the Lessee and reimbursement therefor made to Lessor by Lessee, shall
become the property of Lesaee. �
��`��
LEASE - PAG� 5
� :��
9, ALTERATIQNS: Any improvementa in the spaces rented hereunder that are
to become attached must be approved in advance by the City. The City agrees .to pay
for Khe value of such improvements upon termination of this lease. The County may
make improvements without City approval if it is agreed that such improvements will
be removed at the termination of the Lease and the building restored to its original
condition at County expense.
10. TELEPHONES: The Lessee agrees to pay all installation and service charges
for telephone services provided by the•Lessor for the Lessee's use. This payment
shall be based oa actual costs incurred by the Lessor which are in addition to the
Lessor's normal telephone service costs, and willinclude a pro rata share of the cost
of switchboard service and personnel. Computation for switchboard service shall be
computed on the basis of percentage of total station and trunk line charges
allocated to the County Court.
IN WITNESS Wi�REOF, the parties have set their hands and seals the day and
year above first written.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Witnesses;
By
� . r�yor
' .
'
'
�
'
City Manager �
COUNTY OF ANOKA
BY �_
Chairman of County Board
- ��.�
August 11, 1969
MEMO T0: City Manager and City Council
FROM: Finance Director
SUBJECT: Establishing an Investment Fund
The auditors have recommended that we establish an Investment
Fund. We would carry invesiments in this fund and then
prorate the interest back to each fund on the basis of their
monthly cash balances, rather than carrying investments in
several funds. This would simplify somewhat the matter of
handling investments.
i recomnend the Council authorize the establishment of an
Investment Fund.
'
'
'
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND �„✓
SP E C I FI CAT ION� A ND ES T I M ATES OF COSTS THEREOF: �l
STREET IMPROVII�NT PROJECT ST. 1970-4
��+)
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 125-1969 adopted the 21st day of July, 1969
' by the City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as speci-
fically aoted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A",
and
' �RF�S, all of the property owners whose praperty is liable to be assessed
with the making of these improvements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten (14)
days notice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly
' publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property awuers
heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice.
' NO�,T, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka
County, Minnesota, as follows:
1
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
' ATTEST:
'
'
l. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution
No. 125-1969 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as
soon as reasonably possible, to-wit:
Street improvement including grading, stabilized base, hot mix
bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, water, sanitary sewer lines
and services, incidental drainage and other facilities located as
follaws: .
3rd Street: 58th Ave. to 60th Ave. including Slipoff fram '�.H. #47
2� Street: 58th Avenue to 60th Avenue
T.H. �47 West Service Rd.: 58th Avenue to 60th Avenue
Loop bet. 3rd St. and T.H. �47 West Service Rd, near 60th Ave. -
59th Avenue: 2� Street to T.H. #47 West Service Road
58th Avenue: 2� Street to T.H. �47 West Service Road
2. That work to be performed under t'�is project may be performed under one
or more contracts as may be deemed actvisable upon receipt of bids.
3. That the City Engineer, Nasim M. Qureshi, and the City's Consulting
Engiaeers are hereby designated as the Engineers for this imprave-
sieat. They shall prepare final plans and specificatioas for the making
o£ such improvement.
ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DiAY OF
CITY CLERK - Marvin G. Brunsell
, 1968 .
MAYOx - Jack 0. Kirkham
1'AVING IMI'fZOVEvIi ENT LOCATION MAP
sT. ig7o-4
�' �-' f � � �`�V �. . I'Y . �: .
�
�
�
� � .
�j 'x h
�� N �
I
U
�
i 2
� � v <
� /
�
�
/
a
�
�
a
'' .
'� •
�� �
�i�'/ i
��
.F
���
�
�
�
c
1
�
� �_,
�
,
CI''
I�
RESOLUTION N0.
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS Tf�REOF:
STREET II�ROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1970-1 ADDENDUM �1
��J L
WHEREAS, Resolution No, 123-1969 adopted the 21st day of July, 1969
' by the City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed imprwements, as speci-
fically noted in the Notice of �Iearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A",
and
'
'
'
WHEREAS, all of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed
vith the making of these improvements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten (10)
days notice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly
publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property owners
heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice.
NO�W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, At►oka
Caeinty, Minnesota, as follows: �
'
'
'
,
'
,
'
'
'
, e�sT:
1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution
No. 123-1969 are hereby ordered to b_e effected and completed as
soon as reasonably possible, to-wit:
Street improvement including grading, stabilized base, hot mix bitumiaous
mat, concrete curb and gutter, water, sanitary sewer lines aad services,
incidental drainage and other factlities located as follows:
58th Avenue: Quincy Street to West Moore Lake Drive
59th Avenue: Monroe Street to West Moore Lake Drive
Marigold Terrace: Monroe Street to West Moore Lake Drive
2. That work to be performed under this project may be performed under ome
or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upoa receipt of bids.
3. That the City Engineer, Nasim M. Qureshi, and the City's Consultiag
Engineers are hereby designated as the Engineers for thie improve-
�ent. They shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making
of such improvement.
ADOPTED BY THE CO�TPTCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF
0
' CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell
'
. .
, 1968.
MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham
�
J
�:
��
�:
a �
s -
�� :
,� .
rr =
ii �
it �
a
�
�..
s
9
r
R�� .
• . . - Qi�
.�
� ' 6 p�'
� 41 FeQS$tN A�E
� 3fo �� t�T.s�cKf.y w.
�
• SEALCOAT
-.- $-61£t CCQG � � �/2N QIT. hiAT
� 4" STA�. pASE
. . . Re„ -1-�rr.rf d- 4 s✓ R. w!.i
IMPROVIl�IENT COST:
58TH AVENUE
MARIGOLD TERRACE
59TH AVENUE
•
PAVING IMPROVII�IENT LOCATION MAP
�
ST• 197�-1
��3,500.00
$11,700.00
� 9,9oe.00
(aonENDU� i)
�.���
��" �. _;
r-;
�_ �
'
,
RESOLUTION N0.
� RESOLUTION ORAERING IMPRQVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND
�-� '�� `�SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTTMATES OF COSTS THEREOF:
STR.EET II�ROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1970-2
.1� J�Y .
WfiEREAS, Resolution No.121-1969 adopted the 21st day of July, 1969
� by the City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improv�aents, as speci-
fically noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A",
and
' WHEREAS, all of the propexty owners whose property is liable to be assessed
with the making of these improvements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten (10)
daqs aotice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly
� publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property owners
heazd thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice.
_ _ __ --- - - --- - ----
, NO�W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka
Couaty, Minnesota, as follows:
' 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution
No. 121-1969 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as
soon as xeasonably possible, to-wit.
'
�
,
'
C
'
�
' ATTEST:
C
'
2.
Street improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot mix
bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and
sanitary sewer services, storm sewer and other facilities located
as follows:
Main Street: 58th Avenue to 61st Avenue
West Moore Lake Drive: T.H. #65 to South property of Fridley
High School
That work to be performed under this project may be performed under one
or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids.
3. That the City Engineer, Nasim M. Qureshi, and the City's Conaulting
Engineers are hereby designated as the Engineers for this improve-
ment. They shall prepare final pl.�ns and specifications for the making
of such improvement.
ADOPTED BY Ti�: COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DiAY OF
0
CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell
, 1968.
MAYOx - Jack 0. Kirkham
, ' • • . -'�--��-
, . �9.�; �
' � , 6 � ! '•
s��AF l . �-� y5.o' — ��'�k
a r,u�
' ' --1 . -
__ 6-filii CCAG 2-1 t/2� E21T, htATS
' . � 6~ 57AF3. BASE
. , � f - : .o i.r '� �
� . � �� .,, JL�—
1 - �--
,�,,,, _. _
ss ii �r !i N b �<.Y l�>
_ ��'_' _"_'' r_ ___ � __ " `
--- I-6 `-"f_' 'r' -'�- ' �- -�-� �' 1/�'\
• 4„ ` ' ' .� ( '_�
_� .I ��_ _ __�1 _ _ _'��
C.d r „
' —';.���'�;?���J7'E�4--=�i`J�L_-P�:E',.�, �y� s. �
� � �►. �,� ;- �'tr--�- - - «.. , .
' 6p� � �; �,�` .
�,�- --6- -�. ;-f �-_,'_z_ ;_,r4'< < °•¢ �' S-r. 1970 -2
' � �_ �' ' i �"'�' ' .
' ,.0 � _ " �' <' 's '' � ' _c.u� \ '.. '
t. �� � �. Ys, f �
J ���:i . . � � �.e _ �i \t:- � � � '�
� .�'- -;- -if .�s-- -4°1 _.._ _a_ ,J.� ° ,,.,�y =
, � ��
. i. .M � � ' ---- -
i� �•iS,, w -/t'�' -- '`
—�,.a d_— -- - ---� --- --; -�y-` -- --�-- -��� �.
`, . „ ,;, � I{�l,r� • ` N ,.: � :- �, -
� "°- '� � •
� w�t,�Af2t�QL.D ;;_ YWf��iAC.C,,s`� `. s � \, ,, �
' - /+J - ` ,- - '�'-.:�,� � 9
4i�. � �l! � J )l � � ! 1 J ��� :1��� hI� � j��' 1
� •=�� _I I�'_ �I -�- I�'-�1 'Iht , �.�� / 'S/0�/
i � �7- . I
:'�-.�J_ _!9�-,i_f. _iZ -U_v�,rlo?`��A� 6::' 9. � 1 ...'� , � �
� g'r `
,
. .
-- � -- � --��--- ---� '- --� --- �sa'�_ _ � - --t� ---
' . �� s � x r i �� .� i..r a '_ ' "'_ " "�'_
P �as \
. /s . /f � /A . /J � lo t/ � '` r f �� 1��
t� ..r'� � r , + ��� • t+� �d ` � �1 F
� i, � � . . .u, % �' � .s � .� + ..
i�r• 'f.4 � w�lr A'� . � r� � � ,1 `. �+ ' � : �
' ' .�.$ T N � , � M ..� �; .:;;;;: "� ' -� ; s •,` , r "
� . �. .. ;,,,; f - «,. �,,,; - + i � '
, , ,� ��G�K �� .� � �� ,_._ 'F .,.�
_�;` ' 1 � , , :�.... ,,, ( r-'' � _
�� tir r �� i" ��i �� 'f t T�' �,1 ��rr s�u` � '� �
i Y \� � � ..4 �w ,� .
�r �' s ra.E. ��..
' '_ � ___. `7u � M �. ' 3 .. '" } :I . .
/� `"' S c
. Y' 1 � ` .A` � `�-s� - n�"4.' K s•',:.
_� sJ Y F /S % � '.
�,. � / �r
.,� O � �_ �., _ .f�
'� \ t� _ �b . ., q� t_ ` � i ` /v/� w � �/ /
.ru•n� ' � c .i.�,e�. . 1.: � 2 .�. � � I l
' . NE „ PL�10E��„ '�.'J,«•• x.: � . v� �<�`- , , !
e'� :`` ,!� � /�/
i ' ,,�' 4 t � S � ; i.'s `\. ! �4: �' ,<..,.' ��y' l !
� � 4 � f b i ` (J7C � y �.., _ � i �. ;pi • `' =C y �. / l� �_
� f � � � w s u �'� y � � T '� .2/ ,L �t=r. 1 � n`i C
' -ri .� .. ��.i �?, - - „ — V — — t � �/4��CCJ
�,� Q .
� �,�,'�.'r .�`' 1 II (�ll''.
il if if i� i7 il O � � 7� ~ r � ^` os� r J^j �i��3( �
to . i• . .�•, ,� �l
i - '.
� PAVING IMPROVEMEI�TT LOCATION MAP
PAVII�IEN'1' IMPRQVIl`�ENT COST: STATE AID STANDARD TYPTCAL RESIDENTIA�
, ' ' STREET STREET COST
WEST MOORE LAKE DRIVE �44�400.00 $34,410.00
� SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT COST:
WEST MOORE LAKE DRNE $ 7,400.00 EACH SIDE
' TOTAL 2 x $7,400 = . $14,800.00
I �
'
' : , . • • .. : .
: .
, . - 6 0.' ,
. � � + Y5.0' _!.� .�,�
' • '
' __-_..- Q- 6tII C C d G z— i �!2'� a�r, tit�rs
_ ' 6" STAE3, Bt�SE �
N£ c - .
' L } SE�,4N£R _
�r23_
, - -Gi--S�-- -.-
. -- .I ' o o �" : �° p "i° «
a e
C� � t y� s ss Z
• ,rd � ra
_��
/ `.
��1�:`r
8`
'8 „ � PAVING IMPROV� LOCATION MAP
S.J.7w.�co tiI ' j7 t 17 . �
� zs s u s IMPROVENIENT COST:
� u � � � STATE AID STANDARD TYPICAL
� r� � • ys - �
w,.�.o..r,�� ' ' 13 e . : � . B - - - _ _ STREE'P ' RESIDENT'--
�I.O AG. � u 9 �• Zs o }.; STREET
�' ' zc SO v, • il !0 �n • COST
' . � o st � � Zn ss • - _
� ' � 1e t3 � �g � MAIN STREE�I' $49 , 200 . 00 $ 38 ,130 . G�
ti
_ ; � 11 -- !4 17 1f
`"` . : 1 tf'^ 1s ---
•� .
� ' 60 TH
. Z �
.,
.. o �, ,
0
6 � te i s
'�"� = 19 9 � �,tg - J —
� /CavG�/+c
S-IAC. � a �1 4 T �
� � z< < zc �
'== � zs 6 u �
�'v.�' ' , • Y� 7 If f
! • 13 r 4 13 � J
.F �<�r��r�,i....... _ _f, Z ` 9 1 �_ % .
)J.fc. n%-K4 �; �
w � T t :0 1 ., _ y to
�Z � ' ,t0 lt . ,�o � �'�u
— E,., � 19 !1� 1� �' .tr -
:/kC...,/�.'Ksb Cn��e1�,V);� 1B ' sj 1S u
' �,.s. ^..� j ; 1� !¢ � 11 _ i�
� } 1�,,.. 15,,,.p 16. ,11.
ju
,
: 59 � TH
M . 11.0 / e.f i�•r
11J � � � t '�� �
. � � : 19 2 I 1 :
' N = 1� _ ,�f f •
(� ' • 1� 4 ' Z7 t
4 • = r.� � s _ � �
�.r�vr. co. ' 2f c ` i
.9fAC. --14� J � . ' 13 � � • �
!
9
le �
�_ : 0
4
N
— N j' ' Ir� i2 IY " v \�
Ir 1�" 1° j,..1(7 N IR _I! � �=I
tQ t7 (�i ^'6 • • 17 _s� i
�-- �• 16�„� �rf, �,: : J�. sr : �
�.: 53 „TN,
C� ' , ,. �... � -Frr-
. J
D 1
�.1 —.i _� �
� - -
_ ,
.
Q �--�,r-. :Y t_. � � 9 � �
�•�� : r d ! ��_)-w �
3 '�.`� � ' ' s
�� d..G.:� � v 6%r: 5••1 �„ %. : �, . �.
_ _ ""��""��r� ��„
----�-�---�`J'iT
. , ..
ST . � 970 ' 2.
0
c
j�
l
AGRMT. No.
City
Entered
R E S 0 L U T I 0 N
BE IT RESOLVED, That pursuant to statutory authority, the
City of Fridley Engineer for and on behalf of the C�ty of
Fridley is hereby authorized to request and obtain from
the Minnespta Department of Highways, needed engineeri.ng.
and technical services during the year of 1969; for whiCh
payment will�be made by the City upon receipt of verified
claims from the Commissioner of Highways.
ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRTDLEY THIS �
DAY OF , 1969.
ATTEST:
MA 0- ac . ir am
- arvin . Brunse 1
.���i ,
/
' I2��OI.tJTI�� NO �
. 1969
'
I ,
.� RE�O�U'TION DE��G�']�gNG ppl,i,b�� PI,ACES AND APPOINTIIVG EIBCTION JUDC�ES
�OIt `I°F� S�FT��]��Ii �Os 1969g ��MARY EIECTION
NOW, TEIEFtEFORE B� IT RESO��D� By the City Council of the City of
Fridley� Anolca County� Minneso�a, at a speciei meeting threof on
Atagus t 11, 1969.
SECTION 1: That on the 30th day of September, there shall be an
Election for the purpose of voting on the following:
PRIMARY EIE CTION
SECTION 2: That the polling places for said election shall be as follows:
Ward 1 Precinct i
' Ward 1 Precinct 2
Ward 1 Precinct 3
Absentee Ballot Precinct
Woodcrest School
Hayes School
Riverwood School
City Hall
. ���"�
SECTION 3: That the polling places will be open fr an 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M.
SECTION 4: That the following people are hereby appointed to act as judges
for said election except that the City Clerk is hereby authorized
to appoint qualified substitutes in cases of confliet or interest
as set forth in Chap*_er 4, Section 4.05 of the City Cherter.
v
WARD 1 PRECINCT 1 , 5 Segistered Voters y��Judges
/�� 3
WARD 1 PRECINCT 2
WARD 1 PRECINCT 3
,
1,34d�Registered Voterts - -Judges
�
1 � 504 Registend Votere -yJlidges
/;' �:7
-� v
I
�
/ ,
1 �� � � ��:�
RTSOLUTION N0.__ 1969
DBSIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOINTING EIECTION JUDGES
I ' Page 2
SSC1'ION 5: There is hereby established a special Absentee Ballot Yrecinct
�, in the City of Friciley. The judges for the Absentee Ballot
I
Precinct are: -�
n
I ' ABSENZEE BALIAT PRECINC�' , � �
% ,'' ^ R ,.;�''�l �C_� � �
i � � �' �t.E`' � � v i
l-' �_-
4 j ��. �<<" �.� + ,� 4:: i ;3�' � z�.-
�'-,� , �;; ;r�, ,.. _ � �; w ��---��t
�I E
S CTION 6: That the f 1 w' f
ol o ing �udges are appointed to act as chairman o the
Election Board for the precincts designated end shall have the
�' duties as set forth in Section 203.23 of Minnesota Statutes.
Ward 1 - Precinct 1
, Ward l - Precinct 2
Ward 1 - Precinct 3
Absentee Ba21ot Precinct
' SFsCTION 7: Compensation for said judges will be paid at the rate of 51.50 per
hour for the regular judges and $2.00 for chairmen of the Blection
Board.
'
PA3SBD AND ADOPTED BY 'Tt� CITY COUNCIL OF T� CITY OF FRIDILY
THIS ,�� DAY OF � 1969.
1
i
MAYOR - Jack O. Kirkham
IAT'IEST:
,
' CITY CIERK - Marvin C. Brunsell
,
,
�
r
August 11, 1969
MEMO T0: City Manager and City Council
FROM: Finance Director
SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll - ST. 1968-1B and
ST. 1968-2B Street Projects
1_��
The attached resolutions would order the preparation of the assessment
roll and set up the public hearing for the ST. 1968-1B and ST. 1968-26
Street Project for the 8th of September. Although, the final estimate
has not been turned in on these projects as yet, we expect them to be
turned in in time to work up the assessment roll for the September 8th
meeting.
��
'
,
,
'
'
�
,
,
'
'
�J
'
'
'
'
�J
�
'
'
��RESO�UTION N0. � 1969
A RESpLUTZON DIRECTING ptJBLICATIQN OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR STREET IMPROUEMENT PROJ�CT N0. ST. 1968-16
WHER�AS, by a resolution passed by the Council on August 18, 1969,
th� City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost
of street improvements, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system,
sanitary and water services, and other facilities.
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public
inspection.
NOW,7HER�FORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: .
1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the
City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the
8th day of September, 1969, at 7:30 P.M. to pass
upon the proposed assessment for Street Improvement
Project No. ST. 1968-iB.
2. The City Manager shall p�blish notices of the time
and place of ineeting in the officia1 newspaper of
the City, at least two (2) weeks prior to such
meeting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY GOUNCIL OF TNE CITY OF
FRIDLEY THIS � pAY OF � , 1969
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell
MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham
C
_�_ 1
' � 1_�_ 4
'
,
'
'
RESOLUTION N0. 1969
A RESpI.UT�ON DIR�CTING PREpARATTON OF ASSESSM�NT ROLL FOR STREE'T
TMPRpY�M�NT PROJECT N0. ST, 1968-18
BE IT RESQI.V�D, by the Gity Gouncil of the Gity of Fridley,
Anpka G�unty, Minn�sota as follows:
1. It is her�by determined �hat the assessable cost
' of construction with r�spect to the following
named improvement to-w1t;
�
�
'
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
'
STREET IMPROVEMENT PRp,�ECT N0. ST. 1968-16
including all incid 't 1 expenses thereto is
estimated at ��� ,�� 3 .
2, The City Ma�nager with the assis�an�e of the
City Clerk sha11 forthwith calcu1ate the proper
amounts to be sp�cially �ssess�d for said
improvement against �y�ry assessab1e lot� piece
or parce] of land benefited by said improvement
according to law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRI�LEY TNIS _� DAY , 1969.
AfiT�ST:
Y Gl. K- Marvin C. Brunse
MAYOR - Jack . Kir am
�
,
,
�_J
�
,
�
�
'
'
�I
,
'
'
'
II
�
�
�
I
�
�!
�J
'
RESOLUTION N0. 1969
A RESOLUTIQN DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ST. 1968-26
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on August 18, 1969,
the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost
af street improvements, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system,
sanitary and water services and other facilities.
WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment roll has been completed and filed in his office for public
inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council shall meet at the City Hall in the
City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, on the
8th day of September, 1969, at 7:30 P.M. to pass
upon the proposed assessment for Street Improvement
Project No. ST. 1968-2B.
2. 7he City Manager shall pub1ish notices of the time
and place of ineeting in the official newspaper of
the City, at least two (2) weeks prior to such
meeting.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
FRIDLEY THIS U DAY OF ,
ATTEST
�CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsel
OF
1969.
Y - Jac . K�rkham
�
_�_t �
'
I ��
L�
'
I�
�
,
'
'
�
,
'
RESOLUTION NQ.
1969
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF A�SESSMENT ROLL FOR
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ST. 1968-26
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as Follows:
1. It is hereby determined that the assessable
cost of the construction w�th respect to the
following named improvement to-wit:
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ST. 1968-26
including ai1 incidental, �xpenses thereta is
estimated at %� �, �� �� � �,, .
2. The City Manager with the assistance of the
City Clerk shalT forthwith calculate the
proper amounts to be specially assessed for
said improvement against every assessable
lot, piece or parcel of land benefited by
said improvement according to law.
' PASSED AND ADOPTED BY T E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1969.
'
�
'
ATTEST:
'
IJ
'
'
�
K - arvin . runse
Y - ack . K rkham
�_p_���-' I
�
I '
I '
�
I '
I '
'�i
�
'
'
'
,
'
'
'
'
�
August ]1, 1969
MEMO T0: City Manager and City Council
FROM: Finance Director
SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll - 1969 Service Connections
The attached two resolutions would order the preparation of the
assessment roll and set up the assessment hearing for the 1969
Service Connections.
This assessment roll is different from the normai assessment roll
in that there is no project directly connected with this assessment
hearing. These assessments are far properties that have connected
onto main lines or have otherwise connected onto lines in the City
of Fridley and have not prev3ously paid an assessment.
The assessment roll is being prepared primarily under the authority
and direction set forth in Ordinance No. 113, of the City of Fridley.
� ._.
_ �_. z
C�
0
'
'
1
,�
RESOLUTIQN N0. � 1969
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1969 SERVICE CONNECTIONS
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley,
Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby determined that the assessable
i cost of construction with respect to the
following named improvement, to-wit:
�
'
u
�
J
'
'
11
�
'_ J
'
'
'
,
�
A. The 1969 Sewer and Water Mains, Laterals
and Service Connections, including all
incidental expenses thereto is estimated
at ��a ��
2. The City Manager with the assistance of the
City Clerk shall forthwith calculate the
proper amounts to be specially assessed for
said improvement against every assessable
lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by
said improvement according to law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED B�l THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY THIS � DAY OF , 1969.
ATTEST:
Y L K- arvin . Brunse
MAYOR - Jac 0. Ktr am
1;
_�_�a
'
� ; ,/y�
RESOLUT�ON N0. �� '=1969
, A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL
FOR 1969 SERVICE CONNECTIONS
�
��
�
LJ
�
i�
'
�
i
�
�
�
'
'
,
'..
�
'
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Counci1 of the City of Fridley, Anoka
County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City Council shall meet at the City Ha11 in
the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota on
the 15th day of September, 1969, at 7:30 P.M.
to pass upon the proposed assessment for the
following named improvement.
1969 SERVICE CONIIECTIONS
2. The City Manager shall publish notices of the
time and place of ineeting in the official newspaper
of the City, at least two (2) weeks prior to such
meeting.
PASSEO AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY THIS O DAY OF , 1969.
ATTEST:
TY K- Marv n. Brunse
- Jac . Kir am
t+ i"�%
_ Y_ /
,� �)
_ B_ �'1
COUNCTL APPOINT'MENTS - AUGUST 18, 1969
POLICE PENSION COMMITTEE
�—�o p , � � G,sf
� S 60� �3�r
_ �
C L A I M S
GENERAL
LIQUOR
I8823 — 18977
3582 — 3642
� _ d._;�
n
� City Co�incil
b�t31 Universi.ty i�ve.
I�i.clley� T��inrtesot,a
,�- � n -- � s- o �l
. � -
MaY 28, 1969
.���
GentZer�en:
I, Joe Powers, rasic�3n� at 1s5ttl� 2nct 5t. N.E. do
herebf rec�•sest that accomaanyin� petition be act,ed on
at yavr earliest convenience. I haven�t ariy off the
street parkin� and wiah to bu31c� a garage on our back
lot. An alZey is needed before I can obtain a pernit.
Thank S:ou.
�
Respectfu].ly Yours,
�
, .
�,\ �..�r -
\ _ . ,�
. -
i�'e the vndersi�nec? do h�ereb�r petition to onen and
grade the 411e;� right a wa,� beth-een t�Iain and 2nd
9treet �ror� 1�5h� up to and inclu��in� �5!!!� 2nd St. N.E.
NJ'�•�� .
l. � �. �c:�-✓J
� ' 5���-c'
�, �
' ADD3��3
� ��5y� � ��
� 5 � S� �"� ��l .
� .
3 • �' � � � ` �' , G � � �-� �!, �`t .� � v �,.*'1•�'.�al.-• a�
• �„ a
. ��.�
:i. ��,�"r G�,,�(:t?�� ��:'�'`�i.` i ���isl t` 1� .
r
� �i'Y ■
August 12, 19Eq.
r'ridley City "bar�cil
::it,y �=a11
r'ridley, i� inn.
uentlemen:
The Nichael Servetus Gnitarian Society of �541 Fjast
F�iver Road will be holdin� its fourth ennual �uction on
Labor Day, Monday� September 1, 1969•
The auctioneer will be Nr. Vernon 3wanson of Circle
F�ines.
I wish to request that the auction permit �nd fee be
waived as has been done previously. Thanking you in
advance, I remain,
�
S ncere Yo s,
i
ack Lisowski, Auction Chairman,
51R0 Lincoln Street I�.E.
Fridley, Ninn., 5542�.
(7��-�331)
� 1 '"Y'�
'
' ,
LIST OF CONTRACTOR S LICENSE TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL AT THE MEETING
OF AUGUST 18, 1969
IEXCAVATING APPROVED BY
Frank's Excavating
' 3924 Douglas Drive
Cr stal Minne a
y , sot B: Frank Gaulke W
Y NE Plbg . Insp .
, GAS SERVICES
Fleming Sheet Metal Co.
' 3525 Raleigh Ave. S.
Minneapolis, Minnesota gy; Robert Fleming RENEWAL Plbg. Inep.
1 GENERAL CONTRACTOR
Homewood Realty Co.
622 West Broadway
, Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Henry Lapides NEW Bldg. Insp.
Harvey Peterson
151 Glen Creek Road
' Fridle y, Minnesota By: Harvey Peterson RENEWAL Bldg. Insp.
HEATING
' Fleming Sheet Metal Co.
3525 Raleigh Ave. S.
' Minneapolis, Minnesota By; Robert Fleming RENEWAL Htg. Insp.
,
,
,
'
'
,
,
'
,
'
'
'
,
'
�
'
�
�
,
'
'
' .
,
�
'
,
'
r
�> >
r+�. � 3
MULTIPLE DWELIING LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL:
Au__g_ust 18, 196�_ September 1,,1969 to September 1, 1970 , ,
0'WNER ADDRE55 UNITS FEE �
Willard L. Peterson
4455 Reservoir Blvd. N.E. 5830 - 2nd St. N. E. 4 $10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Hecto Company,
5555 Boone Ave. No. 5848 - 2nd St. N.E. 8 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Thomas C. Walsh
5920 Stinson Blvd. 5866 - 2nd St. N. E. 4 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
Myron Dudynsky
5980 - 2s�d St. N. E. 5980 - 2nd St. N. E. 4 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
John � Lucille Calguire
2018 - 36th Ave. N. E. 6008 - 2nd St. N. E. 4 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Darold D. � Ruth E. Johnson
4216 - 7th St. N. E. 6541 - 2nd St. N. E. 4 10.00
Minneapolis, Min�esota
Dr. Irving Herman
1135 Medical Arts Bldg. 5770 - 2� St. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
James D. Blomberg
7409 Edgebrook Drive 5820 - 2� St. N. E. 4 10.00
St. Louis f'ark, Minnesota
Dr. Irving Herman
1135 Medical Arts Bldg. 5846 - 2'� St. N. E. 6 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Floyd C. Bradlty,
5861 West Moore Lake Dr. 5900 - 2� St. N. E. 7 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
Fioyd C. Bradley
5861 West hbore Lake Dr. 5908 - 2� St. N. E. 7 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
Floyd C. Bradley
5861 West Moore Lake Dr. 5916 - 2� St. N. E. 7 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
�r+.y��
Page 2
Multiple pwelling License
Auqust 18, 1969 September l, 1969 to September 1, 1970
Harold Schmidt
5901 - 22 St. N. E. 5901 - 22 St. N. E. 4 $ 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
Hecto Company
5555 Boone Ave. No. 5924 - 2� St. N. E. 7 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Robert J. Bauman,
Apt. F-7
2825 N. Pascal, 6060 - 2# St. N. E. 4 10.00
St. Paul, Minnesota
John F. Mezzenga
3429 N. E. Ben}amin 4901 - 3rd St. N. E. 7 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Arnold �. Elmquist �
Apt 301
5860 East River Road 4913 - 3rd St. N. E. 7 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
Arnold C. Elmquist
Apt. 301 .
5860 East River Road 4921 - 3rd St. N. E. 7 10.00
Fridiey, Minnesota
Arnold C. Elmquist,
Apt. 301 .
5860 East River Road 4939 - 3rd St. N. E. 7 10.00
fridley, Minnesota
Arnold C. Elmquist,
Apt. 301
5860 East River Road 4949 - 3rd St. N. E. 7 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota .
John D. Miller
47 Rice Creek Way 4965 - 3rd St. N. E. 11 11.00
Fridley, Minnesota
Jon Pendzimas
6624 West Broadway 5401 - 4th St. N. E. 4 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Robert A. Skogrand �
Thomas H. Buesing
4811 Lakeview Ave. No. 5800 - 4th St. N. E. 4 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
David W. Adams
5 4- Sth Ave. S. E. 5374-84 - Sth St.N.E. 4 10.00
R�nneapolis, Minnesota
�°'�r� 1
Page 3
Multiple Dwelling Licenses
Auqust 18, 1969 September 1, 1969 to September lj 1970
Glenn Mostoller
2895 James Ave. So. 5420 - 5th St. N. E. 4 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
T. C. Haik
390 - 57th Place 39� - 57th Place N.E. 4 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
Joseph J. � Patricia ,1.
Ryan
1a785 Valley View Rd. 105 - 58th Ave.N. E. 8 10.00
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
John 0. Bohmer,
211 W. - 2nd St. 191 - 59� Way N.E. 12 12.00
Brooten, Minnesota
Casey Hoban Bach Real Estate
3�25 S. Snelling 389 - 74th Ave. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Casey Hoban Bach Real Estate
3025 S. Snelling 415 - 74th Ave. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Miles Construction
4500 Lyndale Ave. No. 106 - 77th Way N. E. 4 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Dr. I rving Herman
1135 Medical Arts 181 - 79th Way N. E. 8 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Paul M. Burkholder
7860 Alden Way N. E 231 - 79th Way N. E. 7 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
SPGA Associates
909 Farmers � Mechanics Bank 6551 Channel Road 11 11.00
Bldg.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
SPGA Associates
909 Farmers 6 Mechanics 6571 Channel Road 11 11.00
Bank Building,
Minneapolis, Minnesota
M i ke Vaw racz
516 - 19th Ave. N. E 6503 East River Rd. 5 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
� r�
���
Page 4
Multiple Dwelling Licenses
Auctust 18, 1969 September 1, 1969 to Septembar 1, 1970
..
H i rsch B ros . I nc.
(River Road East Apt.) 6550 East River Road 45 45.00
3954 Wooddale Ave.
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Miles Construction Co.
4500 Lyndale Ave. No. 7673 East River Road 4 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Leonard E. Dailey
8251 East River Road 8251 East River Road 5 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
William C. Warner,
6021 Main St. N. E. 6021 Main St. N. E. 4 )0.00
F�idley, Minnesota
Donald C. b Betty A. Wescom
117 Mississippi Place N. E 117 Mississippi Pl. 4 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
John L. Matti
140 MississipQi Place 140 Mississippi P1. 4 10.00
Fridley, Minnesota
Ben Bigos
1215 LaSalle Ave. 5200 - 3rd St. N. E. il 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Ben Bigos �
1215 La Salle Ave. 5201 - 3rd St. N. E. 11 11.-00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Ben B i gos
1215 LaSalle Ave. 5230 - 3rd St. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis� Minnesota
Ben Bigos
1215 LaSalle Ave. 5231 - 3rd St. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Oen Bigos
1215 LaSalle Ave. 5260 - 3rd St. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Ben Bigos
1215 LaSalle Ave. 52b1 - 3rd St. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Ben Bigos �
1215 LaSalle Ave. 529p - 3rd St. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
[�
� '
Page 5
�:;�,A,
r
' Multiple Dwelling Licenses
Auqust 18, 1�6�, September t, �69 to September l, 1970
� � , ��
I Ber� B i gos
�1215 LaSalle Ave. 5291 - 3rd St. N. E. 11 11.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
� �,Ben Bigos
121$ LaSatie Ave. 213-215 - 53rd Ave.N.E. 4 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
;I ' Ben Bigos
1215 LaSalle Ave. 305 - 53rd Ave. N. E. 7 10.00
Minneapolis, Minnesota
' ' Ben Bigos
1215 LaSalle Ave. 5100 Horizon Drive N.E. 5 10.00
i Minneapolis, Minnesota
� Ben Bi os
9
1215 LaSalle Ave. $101 Horizon Drive N.E. 7 10.00
' Minneapolis, Minnesota
'Rogers Properties,
6�12 - SOth Ave. No.
M�nneapolis, Minnesota
' Walter H. � Mary A. Sinner
4427 Mon roe S t. N. E.
, Minneapolis, Minnesota
William H. Lee
'y233 Arthur St. N. E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Euq�nL� La s Ff i n s k i '.
,1035 Polk Place N. E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
�
�
�
,
�
5$51 - 2nd St. N. E.
6511 - 2nd St. N. E.
5�35 - 3rd St. N. E.
4030 Main St. N. E.
�
L�f
7
4
a 1. 00
� ��
10.00
10.00
, ��
� . . ��r�
- Page 6
' Multiple Dwelling Licenses • . ,
Au us t 18 1 6 � �
' Udell Larson. .
68�t8 Knoll St. 5460 - 7th St. N. E. 34 34.00
� Minneapolis, Minnesota
James J. Parnon &
Melvin W. London � 361 - 74th Ave. N. E. 8 10.00
,167$ Grand Ave.
St. Paul, Minnesota
' S � S. Investment Co. .
1202 Pike Lake Dr. 5475 Main St. N. E. i2 12.00
New Brighton, Minnesota
' S � S. Investment Co. �
1202 Pike Lake Dr. 5�95 Main St. N. E. i2 12.00
' New Brighton, Minnesota
A. T. Gearman
6225 University Ave. N. E. 5650 Polk St. N. E. 32 32.00
' _ �ridley, Minnesota
James G. Pappas
�452� Twin Oak Dr. 6111 Star Lane N. E. 18 . 18.00
— Minneapolis, Minnesota
�
' . .
' . .
• .
I '
'
' �
' __
, -
,
' •
i;��� I
RESERVATION FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION - AUGUST 18, 1969
' The Fridley Women's Club would like to reserve the
Fridley Council Chambers for a fashion show for their
, members and guests on Thursday evening, September 4, .
1969 at 8:00 P.M.
' .
'
1 -
�-- .
�
� . .
.
�. �
� � �
�
� -
� .
��
� .
ESTIMATES FOc� COUNCIL APPROVAL - AUGUST 18, 1969
George M. Hansen Company ' �
175 South Plaza Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Annual audit of the City of Fridley
as per estimate
Weaver, Talle & Herrick
316 East Main Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
Estimate for the Month of July for
Services Rendered
Robert L. Miller Construction
1390 Tenth Avenue
Newport, Minnesota 55055
For construction of Storm Sewer Improvement
Project 89, according to contract
FINAL
Arcon Construction Company
Mora, Minnesota
PARTIAL Estimate �k3 for work completed
according to contract
Street Improvement Project ST. 1969-2
Cut off date - August 13, 1969
PARTIAL Estimate ��3 for work completed
according to contract
Street Improvement Project ST. 1969-1
Cut off date - August 13, 1969
Suburban Engineering,Inc.
6875 Highway No. 65 N. E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
PARTIAL Estimate through July 26, 1969
Street Improvement Project ST. 1968-1B $3,I70.77
Street Improvement Project ST. 1968-2B 510.40
Invoice from Soil Engineering Service 88.00
�i)�
$ 6,500.00
2,004.00
1,062.40
3,724.73
30,257.18
3,769.17
ESTIMATES CONTINLTED
August 18, 1969
Comstock & Davis, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
1446 County Road "J"
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
For the furnishing of resident inspection and
resident supervision
Estimate ��2 (PARTIAL) Street Improvement Project
��1969-2 from June 30, 1969 through July 26, 1969
Estimate ��4 (PARTIAL) Street Improvement Project
�k1969-1 from June 30, 1969 through Ju1y Z6, 1969
Estimate ��4 (PARTIAL) Sanitary Sewer, Water and
Storm Sewer Improvement Project �k90 from June 30, 1969
through July 26, 1969
�i���
$ 73.66
1,828.49
1,264.49
GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY
Certijied PHblic �lccoxntRrtts
175 80UTN PLAZA BLOG. MINNlAPOIIS, MINN. 034t6
WwYT�TA �I.Vp. AT NWr. 100
PNON�: 610•SOS7
City af Fridley
6431 University Avenue N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
FOR PROFE8810NAL 6ERVICE!
Annual audit of the City of Fridley as per estimate
'
�
July 31, 1969
$6,500.00
�.�
Y �.t,,,
'
'GHARLES R. WLAVER
NLRMAN L.TALL�
VIR014 C. NERRICK
'RO�ERT MVNNS
JAMtf D.GIBOS
� IREDERICK W.KlISER,JR.
1 rATRICK J. ROCME, JR.
LAW OFFICES
WEAVER, TALLE & HERRICK
City of Fridley
6ltjl University Avenue Northeast
' Fr3dley� Minnesota 55la.21
August lj� 1969
��� �
i10 LABT MAIN STRLET
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 65303
�i1.S�i3
'
Re: July Retainers . 9 0•4Q
'Johanson �rs. Fridley 6 hrs. .
Cor�lemnations rs Lots 1 and 2� Block 2
Central View Manor 2 h�'S.
,Re: 73rd Street 4 �'So
P3ke EasEments 3 hrs.
Preparation of Li:quor Ordinance; 10 hrs.
Resolution and Ba11at on Special
'Election
St. Impo i97a1 3 �S. .
• Fi.reman � s By�I,aws 1 hr.
' ��ilt - #69 � OZ � :1.L-• ..
3O $Z'S�
� �25.0o per hour � 750.00
� SUB TOTsL: $1,700.00
'
�
, City vs. Cochran
Additional F�cpenses i
� Ginger Salary t4ontr, of July
88 hours � $1.75
TOTA L; .
�l
'
,
i �
�
TH�aNK YOU
$ 150.00
154.00
� �00 .00
c
,
' �
,
'
�
, �'i�i'f.".a`.t.(�ilsLt •;' �a'��:�sCi n ��qi o
, ri�ui:s:aJ°z aAil�; �:�ij�e.2s: E3�Fi
' ��L)C� Ccs�.�ax�:p i?�UU��3 ���v�
rii�:����,a�.��, tii�..�A€:��� 5�!��2
Jg�3.g� 3:�, la�i3
�I�:�*�g�:'��.� ����� � �i�� �e����
�.i%� liSro it.<°"."�'�'�g' iwn :SL4ne��si':= ��.� 1..�.'..�u?��:�.
C:;.�� G� r��?s3�r:j�
V'9�d� �bibV��i0.f3iSs� ]J�:bSl�g li0[•vJ0
Pf3z�f�����'�:€,s�, ti:�r����c��� 5r�'a��
� �::^�as �.��a�:
,
'
�
�s�1<i ��A�' a�.�ss:��'�.�,'^s �'.ii nF�.� e�1i��,�`i�`.S+ �
::5f � d �• * � 2fT� 1t�a o: fa.c1.? n i? 1� �s�:iss+LY.3i?�.i� �V.i �'�b'Y�b O
�._ x��g �� h€���.�af,�:�:a 1� � :.z:... �� - �-3 , ��°e, ��.��:�. � , � � �� I�
t��:��w� ���.��:�>��.¢s�� a��� '"€����`� .�����T�zy�:� 3:ysw�e���:� ii�.�.:��'��� �5fl5�9 fo�t �m�s4:����
�i�':a�� Ria�: .�'�k`.rY�3 �.^v",;'�?�' �s;;;F:S`i�?�,:m•vu3� �'�s�v��'.e :. G�a �,'�'��d"�i�.3�.� �� �..'��i:::°��G'`�c
�'%i �;���o'?�s �e"a.`"�`�t3 e�P3.°'3 �.�"�..Ch ��� 8 �,� ) o0t�
�:��e3�.���� �ti �3i,r�:�'�
1L�o e �,�'o �r?t�s:fa �:�.�;4;.,�� �� � 4`��d� $ ����59
����`����, � a�s o 531
� � ��s��.�;�;����� ���� ��������°__
� � �_�--
� .
� tD 3COl'n J�f� L:.o ap 36� l': yin��s4'�
I
'
,
'
'
1
'
$ 3�C,e�3i�
�ga'o����^l. �338.�a:�
�?a�"s$:���� ��u�E�A aAi.��i�e.��i`�� �i.���� $1V9��a�.ioS�
I����s �r:,•�:��� ��,�o � � ��;"s��o�� . $ 997�8.��
"4,K¢x�a1s:3 PCi%'� 1'iUm n n e, e o c c o 0 0 .- o a o o c o c o 0 0 0 0 0 o e • y Afl�i`3e:e.�t1
� � C /.'i � `♦ r.y w ��� � F` "'L ,. f :) �� 5_ F� � C .. � � `) e1� b �i
�'i: SA��y.. 81s�:ev"�'i ��. 'c.�.�}; .. ti; �3 :�' ,a;..�.:,.�::F«>�. .�;:..�� �' 33�; :;°ke:c. �;:�.€.' 8�1�".°. �.� €;�1`sE��:...°9.�ab3.+.f1f
..� R^� t..! 7 3 �� �:�?i•"T�CI �E .:a � f 'lV�� ,y .p....� k �
Ca:,w't�'5�.��'� �rw .�fi.,�ti..�..*.., :� xs.:f.�_l � ,_ �._ .L�_!U`d'. Gv�',;._,...� s� 4��.,. 'i'�.°(��?.:fs.�€�t! ��'d�..� ��li; .:�.Y3E9�.
pq��L<"�e�.S��i�e �'�.A', �:+`�°.t� L � F n� :, ` �t +y e•� ?4 {rs='* ' .� � 3.� a ,� <`�'.-%aiF �i <�b �1�� �As�s�. �� i�
k, a�:�; ��ea. �"�S.' i, $=J .i.' 3�'..sv..� JL�� i�:�5�
G�7`�.roYl,'o.%4��a"L3.r1 ?�"-Z3..�:'ra�.�*3a�°.�a' �✓v�$tia i�.s.:...r;.:'�>S'-oc �v?'a'2 f.`�'':� C1��@? �..+_'��;"�.'i� �:?i)Peiic"".yo
�'�;'�,3` ,��,:.��
Q.°y:e i�s'�i°`;':>°`s. 1F.�e A�3..A_l.f.'.[: i:+_a'T'�°??�:
3:.�:%,F,��n�''„a.�;Y:::e b',T' t"'c?�`:'�w?�.�;`b:°�
e 1 •
x;^'r„�P�';,7 �. °z�:.t%,F: 'Z 8'e
� �.�t�:,::�d' ��� ��.�.�^� �31✓ � y�
�� �. ���_��'��" � �' --- -
�ct7e�`:� _R�°��,::�n Po�,,,
,
,
,
�
'
'
,
'
,
'
�
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
, .;^-
-�z�.�
r
.
�c#�MR-PREUS COMPANY 52t SOUTH 7iN STREET, MINNFAPOIIi, MINNESOTA SSI15 • PMONE: 77!•76N
Mr. Marvin C. Brunsell, Fiaance Director
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
August 8, 1�69
Re: Workmen's �ompensation - Dividend - Un Policy WC-343561
Which expired 1/1/6�
Dear Mr. Brunsell:
In my letter of April 3, 1969, sendind you.the final premium adjuetment
statement, I advised you thac on the basis of the thee established losaes
the city would be entitled to a dividend of 15.57 - ueing the standard
premium figure of $17,358. as appearing on the first premiu�n adjustment
statement.
However, we discovered that the first premium adjustment was incorrect in that
the Company Auditor had used a payroll figure of $47,772. for full time Firemen����
whereas thia figuxe should have been $19,951. A revised Final premium adjustment
statement was issued on April 29, 1969 - which revised the Standard premium
from $17,358. to $16,277.
Enclosed you will now find a Dividend memo shoWing the Dividend calculation -
based on a Standard premium of $16,277. - Losses of $3,868. - a Loss ratio of
23.75% - which with a dividend of 15.5% reaults in a dividend of $2,522.y4 for
which the check of the Agricultural Insurance Comgany is also enclused.
Just for the rec�rd - the total earned premium for the City of Fri�i�ey for 1y68
was $18,085. at atan�ard manual rates. However, with an Experience credit of 10�
($1,808.) a Premium iscount of 12.4% �2,018) and now the Dividend of 15.5� or
($2,522.94) the tc�al cost was reduced fro►n $18,085. to a net of $11,736. w h is
a saving of $6,349. or better than 35% less than th8 standard or average nicipalityEf
in the State of Minnesota. This is saving money for the Taxpayers and th City Council
3�ould be cotuended for their judgement - and the employees for a good job in keeping
the losses under control. May we continue for ever on thia basis Thank you.
Ve tru y s,
. M. N el, A t
Carr - Preus
�
PERSONAIIZED INSURANCE SERVICE
_ _. _ _„_ , .,..:� _. — - -
� -----.—�--�� . ,
����
- AGRICL�LTURAL INSURANCE GROUP • ���- `
' } DIYtDEND MEMO ��
- k•.
Agriculturo! Insvrance Compony . � Ametitan Empire Insurcnca Cornpanr . i:
• Of South Dal�ota x �
��'"�'�� ��
Insured & ' � _ s, ,� n
ddress: GfTY 4f F�r�c,eY � �V �
Date:' Date of Check � � '
� _ -. - = •7=-- >" '
' �' ; �i };�;:��' f
A enr Ca��t-F��u� Co�nrrr g�g �_..
,p �� .�
e • Agency Code: Check No: �-:. -� '
; Dividend Calculacion for Workmen's Compensation Policy (Agriculcural Only) Plan � ��::`
e'. .
�;
Scandard Prem, j6�277•�0 Scandard Prem. ����77•� Standard Prem. Standard Prem.
��-`:. ,
. . x:
Tocal Losses 3��8•�� Dinidend %_ ��•� Dividend % Dividend % -�` `
Loss Ratio Z3•7� Dividend��•94 Dividend Dividend '�
};;
�,
Pcemium Discount Alloe�ed ; ZJ0�8•� ��•�� ; _ , �
� t:
Polic Pqiod Scace Covera e
P��Iicy tiumber g Dividend Gen. A�� Sub. Co. Div. Off. De Ezp. I.D. Exp.
From To Code Code Led. ' Acc. C6g. p' Line Code Grp.
; �� � :�� s> >/t/s� t/t/s� � r.r�o z��a.s� e � - 3 _ a _ ,ao r� . ;::
i 1 � � .�
;�
i F
� . g'
� #;'- . .
3 i
: Instcuctions Mait original with t6e check. Ateach second copy to daily Send third coyy co General Accouating.
, �
,
��RM 30003 B 7•64
_
� . . . . .. . _ - � . . ��_ ..
� t+-'r •r-+ v.�rr � ,�r... �• r ;�_�, _- "'r i.:�-�ti+�+ ,..'..��. .,yr r- �� ..c; s ;"S':-
t� .. ' . ' . . . . ' � . - . . � � '
' . , . . . .. r '
" , ' i
' , j Y
- . . . . . . . "' 1 . . ' . .
' _
� � . . . . � .. � � .� . �.
' . . . . . � . - . � .. ' � � _ . • ..
� � . . . � . . � . .. . . . . . . . . . . :
i , � .
�� )�
August 11, 1969
City of Fridley
Attn: City tilanager
We, the homeowners� involved in Improvement St. 19?0-1, object to
the proposed installation of a storm sewer system in our area. Our
interest as owners has been materiaily prejudiced because we were
not notified and therefore unable to pr�sent proper objections.
Sincerely,
�� �'' � �' _ " -�m��.,-,
� ����
[-1
�
PI�tEW00D � ��
HILLVI EW
KNOLLWOOD
TWELVE OAKS
� �
� a e o o�� s�e
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
2401 HIGHWAY 10
ST. PAUL, MINN. 55112
SU. 4-3055
August 13, 1969
City of Fridley
, 6431 University Avenue N.E,
Fridley, Minnesota
' Gentlemen:
Please accept our sincere gratitude for your assistance during
our water emergency on August llth.
DSZ:Nea
''i ,
INGRAM RUSTAD, MAVOR
AERRV MALVIN,COUNCILMAN
i�cerely,
� �
1 ��� �
Dennis S. Zy
Clerk-Admini ator,
R�CHARD JOHNSON, COUNCILMAN LLOVD BLANCHARO, COUNCILMAN
DONAL� HOOGES, COUNCILMAN DENNIS ZVLLA, CLERK-ADMINISTRATQR
'
'
,
�
City of Fridleq, Minneaota
Office of the Building Inepector
TOPIC : I�iT�Y REPOBT TO THE CI1R MAPAGER
JDLY 1969
N[J1�ER OF PBR1rIITS ISSUBD
1969 1968 TgIS YEAR I.AST YEAS
' TYPB 0� CONST�LUCTIOF JtJLY JOLY TO DATE TO DATB
'
'
'
'
�J
,
,
'
�
�'
r-,
,��
,_J
,
'
'
,
�eaidential 11 14 77 113
Residential Garages 10 12 68 52
Additioos 6 Alteratio� 16 12 79 i9
Multipl� D�allinge 0 0 2 2
Comsiercial 3 0 10 5
Induetrial 0 1 6 S
Municipal 0 0 0 1
Churche� � Schools 0 0 1 0
8ospitals 1 0 1 0
Signa 2 2 23 14
l�oving 4 1 8 1
46 42 274 , 262
OTH88S �
Aeating�; 20 34 179 192
Pl�bing 23 36 178 169 �
Electrical 55 47 325 307
98 117 682 6 8
Ssaidantial $
�e�idantial Garagea
Altsrations � Additiaas
l�iultipl. Da�ellinga
Ca�arcial
Induetrial
Municipal
Churches b Schoole
Boepitals
Siga�
Maving
ESTIMATED VALIIATIOP OF BUiLDIPC PERMITS ISSIISD
278,700 $ 273,400 $ 1,786,750 $ 2,435,100
21,798 20,265 123,845 86,640
21,670 42,709 425,786 181,968
0 0 1,600,000 336,000
60, 000 0 . 505.500 333, 860
0 25,000 3,140,000 1,533,700
0 0 0 94�000
0 0 800, 000 0
500, 000 0 500, 000 0
1.450 10,250 18,315 19,Hl0
1 600 200 3 300 200
$ 885,218 371,824 8,903,496 S,Q�1�288
'
�
1�T�.Y REPORT TO THE CITY MANAGER
' Ji�.Y 1969
POAIDER OF LIC8NS8 CURREATI.Y IA EFFECT
� � .
LICEPSE FEES CaLT.ECTSD TO DiATS
' TYPE P[II�ER FEES COLLBCTED
sr�acRrorru�cc a S i2o
EXCAVATIPG 21 31�
; � CAS 31 465
GEPERAL 81 2,025
HEATIPG � 43 645
I' HOOSE MOVIPG 2 30
MA30NRY 24 360
OIL ASATIFG 6 90
' PLASTERIPG 6 90
ROOFIIiG 2 30
SIQiS 17 425
i�1SLL DBILLII�G 0 0
� 241 $ 4,595
' PERMIT FBES
' 1969 1968 TIiIS YBAR LAST YSAR
PEBMIT P[1IrIDERS TYPE JULY JI1LY TO QATS TO DAlB
, ' #10,310- #10,354 BUII.DIPG $2178 $ 1695 $12,455 $17,331
�7811 -#7865 EI.ECTRICAL 1014 820 10,247 6,746
! #4529- #4548 HEATIRG 298 1357. 6,243 13,402
#4962 -#4984 PLUI�IPG 553 2508 5,6$0 6,317
' SIGP3 35 174 598 458
' $ 4078 $ 6554 $ 35,223 $44,254
'
�
�
�
�
1�
�I
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY OF FRIDLEY
MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1969
' STREET DEPARTMENT HOURS
1. Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301�
2. Grading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
' 3. Gravel Hauling . . . . . : : : : : : : : : : 4
4. Miscellaneous Street Work 317'�
5. Patching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 759'�
6. Shop Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
' 7. Signs and Barricades . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
8. Equipment Repairs - Street . . . . . . . . . 228
WATER DEPARIMENT
' 1. Filtration Plant Operations . . : : : : : : :
2. Final Readings and Collections
3. Hydrant Repairs and Flushing . . . . . . . .
' 4. Miscellaneous Water Work• ; : : : : : : : : :
5. Pumphouse Work
6. Standpipe Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Valve Inspections and Repairs . . . . . . . .
, 8. Water and Sewer Inspections . . . . . : : : :
9. Water Meter Inspections and Repairs .
10. Water Turn-ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
' 11. Watermain Breaks . : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
12. Watermain Taps
13. Equipment Repairs - Water . . . . . . . . . .
�
'
'
SEWER DEPARTMENT
1. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs ....
2. Manhole Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Miscellaneous Sewer Work . . . . . . . . . .
4. Sanitary Sewer Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Sanitary Sewer Inspections . . . . . . . . .
6. Equipment Repairs - Sewer . . . . . . . . . .
191
84
63�
164
175�
74
21
28�
28
182
73�
2�
20
166�
47�
119�
179�
77
16
STORM SEWER DEPARTMENT
1. Catch Basin and Storm Sewer Cleaning .... 155
2. Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work ....... 67
Page 7tao
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1969
MISCELLANEOUS HOURS
1. Day Off {Flood Control) . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2. Fire Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3. Fire School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. Flood Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5. Funeral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Injury on Job - Gary Larson . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Park Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
8 . S ick Leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
9. Vacations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
10. Weekend Duty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
11. Equipment Repairs - Engineering . . . . . . . 3
12. Equipment Repairs - Fire Department ..... 6
13. Equipment Repairs - Park Department ..... 61
14. Equipment Repairs - Police Department .... 21�
'
�
'
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY OF FRIDLEY
MONTHLY REPORT - JULY 1969
STREET DEPARTMENT HOURS
1. Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
2. Grading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3. Gravel Hauling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
4. Gravel Surfacing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
5. Miscellaneous Street Work . . . . . . . . . . 226�
6. Patching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 836'�
7. Shop Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119�
8. Signs and Barricades . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
9. Equipment Repairs - Street . . . . . . . . . 223
WATER AEPARTMENT
1. Filtration Plant Operations . . . . . . . . . 203�
2. Final Readings and Collections ....... 97'�
3. Hydrant Repairs and Flushing . . . . . . . . 23�
4. Miscellaneous Water Work . . . . . . . . . . 190'�
5. Pumphouse Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
b. Standpipe Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33�
7. Valve Inspections and Repairs . . . . . . . . 41'�
8. Water and Sewer Inspections . . . . . . . . . 20'�
9. Water Meter Inspections and Repairs ..... 58
10. Water Turn-ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11�
11. Watermain Breaks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
12 . Watermain Taps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2
13. Equipment Repairs - Water . . . . . . . . . . 72
SEWER DEPARTMENT
1. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs .... 210�
2. Miscellaneous Sewer Work . . . . . . . . . . 176
3. Sanitary Sewer Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . 128'�
4. Sanitary Sewer Inspections . . . . . . . . . 41
5. Equipment Repairs - Sewer . . . . . . . . . . 36
STO�I SEWER DEPARTMENT
1. Catch Basin and Storm Sewer Cleaning .... 106
2. Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work ....... 41
,
, Page Ztao
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - JULY 1969
I ,
'
�J
�
'
'
,
'
MISCELLANEOUS HOURS
1. Boarding up House (5831-3rd St. N.E.) .... 12
2. Day Off (Flood Control) . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3. Fire Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Flood Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. Holiday . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328
6. Labor Union . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Sick Leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
8. Vacations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 572
9. Weekend Duty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
10. Equipment Repairs - Administration ..... 6
11. Equipment Repairs - Engineering . . . . . . . 36
12. Equipment Repairs - Fire Department ..... 6
13. Equipment Repairs - Liquor Stores ...... 4
14. Equipment Repairs - Park Department ..... 33
15. Equipment Repairs - Police Department .... 44
16. Equipment Repairs - Snow and Ice ...... 22