The URL can be used to link to this page

02/01/1971 - 5820JUEL MERCER - COUNCIL SECY. COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 7:30 P.M. FEBRUARY 1, 1971 ' _ ' ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1, 1971 - 7:30 P. M. ' ' PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ' . INVOCATION ' ' ROLL CALL: - ' APPROVAL OF MINU'�E S : ' ! Regular Council Meeting of January 18, 1971 ' - ADOPTION OF AGENDA: ' ' VISITORS: . ' Consideration of Items Not on Agenda - 15 Minutes ' PUBLIC HEARINGS: ' ' None ' ' ' � ' � �I , CITY COUNCIL AGENDA, FEBRUARY 1,.1971 PAGE 2 OLD BUSINESS• ' 1. Consideration of Approval of Agreement Between Acres, Inc., Viewcon, Inc., and City of Fridley in relation to the • Development of Innsbruck North Area � and Consideration of Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the ' City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota by Making a change in the Zoning District From R-1 to R-3A (ZOA �k70-05)`, Request by Viewcon, Inc. ' � ' , , , - � ' � � r''� O � ,� Comment; The language of the agreement has been revised by the City Attorney. The applicant hopes to have a signed copy of the agreement available to the City Council at the Monday meeting. The first reading of the rezoning ordinance was held on October 5, 1970. The agreement is in the Agenda envelope) 2. Discussion Regarding Revisions to Safety and Road Improvements of East River Road and Other Roads in the Area - Project ST. 1971-3 Pages 1 & 2 Pages 3 - 6 Comment: Have had numerous meetings with the County Engineer and County Consultant to make modifications to the plan and convince the County to carry the greater port�on of the improvement cost. Also, attended Anoka County Road and Bridge Subcommittee meeting on Monday, January 25, 1971. We have been able to con- yince the County to take. a larger portion of the improvement including paying for the paving of Ashton Avenue extension. We would like the City Council review at this meeting so that the Council approved plan can be presented to the public at the February 8, 1971 meeting) NEW BUSINESS: 3. Receiving Summary of the Survey in Regard to Gardena Avenue Sidewalk Prepared by Gardena Elementary PTA and Their Request For Further Consideration of Sidewalks on Gardena Avenue Comment: An overwhel.ming majority of the people in the area have indicated the need for the sidewalks. If the Council feels that the sidewalks warrant further consideration, then we recommend they authorize an informal hearing to discuss the improvement which could be held on February 8, 1971) Pages 7 & 8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA, FEBRUARY 1, 1971 PAGE 3 NEW BUSINESS (Gontinued) 4. Consideration of Expiration of George Balthazor Occupancy Fermit 5. Receiving the Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting of December 28, 1970 6. Receiving the Minutes of the Building Standards Design Control Meeting of January 19, 1971 7. Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 20, 1971. 8. Receiving the Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of January 26, 1971 0 Pages 9 - 15 Pages 16 - 19 Pages 20 & 21 � Pages 22 - 30 � Pages 31 - 33 � ' � ' ' � � � � ' , � � � � � , ' � ' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA, FEBRUARY 1, 1971 :IEW BUSINESS (Continued) 9. Consideration For Approval of First Phase of Street Lighting Program For 1971 Comment; The City has 30 street lights budgeted under street lighting for 1971. We are recommending installation of 16 lights as a first stage in accordance with our 5 Year Street Lighting Program with some minor modifications taking into consideration some of the requests by the citizens, The.other 10 lights are being requested by the Parks Department and will be paid by the Parks budget) 10. Discussion of Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan For the City of Fridley as Required by the Metro Sewe� Act, Chapter 449 Comment: This has bePn brought to the City Council's attention twice before. We would like to bring the C�uncil np to date and get outline approval before the actual report is prepared as required by the Metro Sewer Board. Also, this comprehensive plan' is needed if we are going to 6e doing any alteration to the existing system or adding additional sewer lines in the different areas of the City. The report is in the agenda folder) 11. Consideration of Approval of Final Plans for T.H. ��47 Slip-Off, Hyde Park Area - Comment: Construction plans have been prepared. Once they are approved by the City Council these will be submitted fqr the Minnesota Highway Dept's review and approval) � 12. Consideration of Request for Release of Certain Temporary Construction Easements on Property South of Railroad Accessories Comment; This property has been sold to an industrial plant. " The City acquired the temporary construction easements for construction of storm sewer Project ��12 in 1965. The buyer is requesting that these be released formally by the City. We recommend that these be released as we don't need this easement anymore) PAGE 4 Pages 34 - 39 Page 40 Page 41 Pages 42 - 44 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA, FEBRUARY 1, 1971 PAGE 5 NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 13. Discussion Regarding Bounty on Pocket Gophers 14. Discussion Regarding 77th and 79th Avenue Railroad Crossings and Other Related Items Comment: We have received some information from Edina in regard to their industrial complex near Interstate �k494. We will present this information for Council review) 15. Discussion Regarding Existing Code Requiring Garages With Single Family Dwellings and Other Pertinent Information � Comment: Council received this information at their January 18, 1971 meeting and now it is to be put back on the Council agenda for further consideration) 16. Discussion Regarding Complaint on Special Assessments on Lot 1, Block 2, Oak Hill Addition, Owned t;; St. Timothy's Church Pages 45 & 46 � Pages 47 - 52 � Pages 53 & 54 � Pages 55 & 56 � , ' � � � � t , � _ � - � � � ' , � CITY COUNCIL AGENDA, FEBRUARY l, 1971 NEW BUSINESS (Continued) Z7. Resolution Ordering Improvement and Plans and Specifications For Street Improvement Project ST. 1970-3, Addendum ��1 (Sidewalks) Comment; The Public Hearing for improvement of sidewalks from _ 57th Avenue to 64th Avenue along University Ave. East Service Dr. was held on January 18, 1971. Mr. Powell spoke against installing sidewalk along his property. No objections from anybody else� 18. Resolution Ordering Improvement Plans and Specifications For Street Improvement Project ST. 1971-1, Addendum ��1 Comment: The Public Hearing was held �n January 18, 1971. Richard Fudali, Five Sands, spoke against assessing their property for improvement of 79th Way because of the ��striction of their use of 79th Way E. of Lincoln St, Burlington Northern Representative objected to completing the East River Road East Service Dr. in the areas still not developed. The proposed resolution covers the improvement of Lincoln Street, 79th Way and a portion of East River Road East Service Drive in front of Wicks Corp. and Plywood Minnesota. If the Council does not wish to order 79th Way then the Council should adopt the resolution without 79th Way in it) 19. Consideration�of Resolution Approving Layout and Proposal For Traffic Signals at 61st Avenue and T.H. ��65 Comment; If the plans and cost participation is approved by the City the Highway Department will hopefully let the contract in August 1971. Plans will be available for Council review at the meeting) 20. Resolution Authorizing Acquisition of Certain Easement and Right of Ways for Different Projects � Comment: This resolution would authorize the Administration and the City Attorney to negotiate with the property owners of the different right of ways and easements needed for construction projects in progress and proposed this year. If the negotiations , are not successful then the City Attorney can proceed with acquisition by condemnation) PAGE 6 Page 57 Page 58 Pages 59 - 61 Pages 62 - 73 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA, FEBRUARY 1, 1971 NEW BUSINESS (Continued) 21. Receiving Hea'th Activity Report for the Final Quarter of 1970. 22. Consideration of First Reading of An Ordinance Amending Section 3.03 of the City Code, Changing Holiday Schedule and Changing the Date of the Second Regular Council Meeting in February Comment: February 15th will be a legal holiday - President's Birthday) 23. Claims 24. Licenses 25. Estimates 26. COMMUNICATIONS: A. Minnesota Highway Department; Denying the Approval of , The Monies Under T.O.P.I.C.S. for University Avenue Loopbacks - Project ST. 1970-3 B. Wyman Smith: Helpful Police Service ADJOURN: PAGE 7 Page s 74 - 76 � Page 77 Page 78 Page 7� Pages 80 & 81 ■ Page 82 Page 83 [J � � � ' ' i , ' , ' THE MINUTES OF THE REGt�JL.AR COU:7�iT� MEETII�TG OF JANUARY 18, 1971 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Kirkham lead the Council and the audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. INVOCATION: Reverend Richard Podvin offered the Invocation. ROLL CALL: MF�IBERS PRESENT: Breider, Kelshaw, Kirkham, Liebl, Harris MFMBERS ABSENT: None PRESENTATION OF AWARDS: Mayor Kirkham asked Councilman Harris to make the award to David Larson, Chairman of N.S.S.S.D. Councilman Harris said that he was glad to see the nuiaber of people here tonight. He said that Mr. Larson has spent many many hours in serving on the N.S.S.S.D. and he has enjoyed serving with him. He then read the inscription on the Certificate of Appreciation and said thank you for his time and effort. Mr. Larson said that he app�eciated this award and it is a unique type of award. He said that it is very much appreciated. He said that he had served with Councilman Harris as Vice Chairman, and he appreciated the opportunity of working with him. Mayor Kirkham then called Mr. Frank Hart, Richard Harris, Robert E. Kelshaw, George Zeglen, Alex Novitsky, Clifford Ash and Mike O'Bannon forward to receive their awards. He said thank you to them all for their work on the subcommittees. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 4, 1971: MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 4, 1971 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 1971: MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt the Minutes of the Special Public Hearing Meeting of January 11, 1971 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 1971 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Kirkham said that he would like to add the following: 3A. Discussion of East River Road Improvements. PAGE 2 I MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt the Agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. VISITORS: Mr. M.M. Mahurin said that two weeks ago he appeared here to suggest beginning a plan to examine putting tax exempt property back on the tax rolls. He would suggest a group or committee to contact the Legislators as an investiqative step. He said that he would like to repeat his desire for such a group. They would go before the Legislators and press the case. He said that he thought that the Legislature was going to adopt a hard nosed attitude toward tax exempt properties. Councilman Kelshaw said that he had talked to the Assessor and he was in total agreement. He agreed that a committee could be set up to do this, although there would be no guarantees that it would do any good, but it was worth a chance. We would not be asking for something that is not ours. He said that he would be in touch with the City Assessor. Councilman Liebl suggested that this effort be combined with other communities to be effective. The Legis- lators should be contacted. Councilman Kelshaw said that he had talked to Joe Connors and was in favor of keeping the lines of communication open. He agreed that this should be pursued so that the City would have personnel on hand � when it is needed. Councilman Harris said that he agreed with this general philosophy, however, he felt that the City Administration and City Attorney should formulate some guidelir�s as this group would be acting in the City's behalf. They could set up the framework of the committee. MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to authorize Mayor Kirkham to set up a committee to woYk with the City Assessor within �he framework laid out by the City Attorney and the City Administration. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Mahurin said that this qroup could contact members of other communities. Larrv Benson, NSP: Mr. Larry Benson, NSP, reported that they are negotiating with Burlinqton Northern now and the induction problems should be solved very shortly. He said that everything is going nicely. He then introduced Mr. Warren ,7ohnson, who will have the City of Fridley as his responsibility. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1970-3, ADDENDUM #1: Mayor Kirkham said that this was for sidewalks on the east side of University Avenue from 57� Avenue t� 6�}th AVenue. , L_� � , ' � REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING UF JANUARY 18, 1971 PAGE 3 The City Engineer said that this was to complete the incompleted stretch of sidewalks from 57th Avenue to Mississippi Street. At the intersections of 61st and 57th the City is trying to detach the service roads. The contractor is to start this construction season. He then showed on the overhead projector where the sidewalks would go. He said that he hoped to do this work in con- junction with the detachment of the roads. Mr. Ernest Powell, 6241 Sunrise Drive said that he had property on 63rd and , University that is not developed. He did not feel sidewalks were necessary, and the traffic on that side of the street did not warrant the expense. The City Attorney said that he had an inquiry from a person in Rees Addition. 1 They were not opposed necessarily, but wanted to know how much additional right of way would be taken and how this would affect the parking in the commercial area. The City Engineer said that thep plan to get the right of I way from the Highway Department and they plan to take no right of way from this property. 1 MOTION by Councilman Liebl to close the Public Hearing on Street Improvement Project St. 1970-3, Addendum #1. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the hearing closed at 8:28 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PRA7ECT ST. 1971-1, ADDENDUM #l: 79th Way: East River Road to East Property Line of Lot 4, Block 2, Pearson's lst Addition: Lincoln Street: 79th Way to South 150 Feet- Mayor Kirkham read the location of the streets from the Public Hearing Notice and the City Engineer showed them on the overhead projector. He �aid that 79th Way is a staged type of construction. There is curbing on the north side. The street still needs the final mat and curbing on the south side. The pro- posal is to finish the street now as originally planned as there is a development going in south of 79th i�ay. Mr. Richard Fudali, Attorney for Five Sands, said that they are now in the process of constructing 120 units directly south of 79th Way. These will be ready in the spring, and they plan to have the project done by next year. He said that the benefit of 79th Way from Lincoln Street on east is nil to Five Sands as when they applied for their building permit they were restricted from using 79th Way for access. If that street should disappear, it would not affect Five Sands. He said they just closed their second F.H.A. mortgage last week. He had to explain to the F.H.A. why they could not use the road. He said that this is what they told the people, but he did not know that it would be legally binding through the restrictions on the building permit. They would be willing to pay for any frontage road they could use, and they would be willing to pay for the upgrading of 79th if they could use it. Their plans call for 'an interior street to connect to Lincoln Street for access. He said that �emergency vehicles could not even get into their development from 79th Way, so he could see no benefit. There are to be no curb cuts along the south side of 79th Way. REGULAR C�)UNC;�T.'�� MEETI'I`?i: ^l�' ,.�ANU.?�RY 1_4 :, �,'':, PAGE 4 Councilman Liebl asken if this was not one of the conditions for getting a building permit. Mr. Fudali saifl that this is not correct as far as he knew. When he came in to act as attorney, he reviewed all the Planning Comtnission and Council Minutes. After the action was started, on behalf of the residents on tY�E� north side of 79th Way, they said that they would not use 79th Wa�° fs��_ access, but he did not know this would be one of the stipulations. They told the people that they would make every attempt to keep the traffic toward Lincoln Street. He felt that this was a private agreement with the residents. He did not know there was any discussion of 79th Way being a atate aid street. That would take all the privacy out of the road. He said that it was rather difficult to explain to the F.H.A. why they could not use the pub�ic roadway. They did not enter into any legally binding agreement. They will try to keep the traffic toward Lincoln Street, but they would prefer to have the curb cuts. Mayor Kirkham said that if no benefit could be proven, then they would not be assessed. Councilman Kelshaw asked if they did not know that there was going to be anything done with 79th Way. Mr. Fudali said that they had no idea that 79th would be going through to University Avenue. The City Engineer said that it was designated state aid in 1960. When the first stage was put in, they did not put in the curb cuts on the south side as the development was not known. There has been a petition received to do Lincoln Street. Mr. Fudali said that Lincoln Street is the only way to get into their property from the north, so it is a necessity that Lincoln Street is done. He said that they would have no objection to the assessments for 79th Way, if they could use it. Councilman Kelshaw said that he had talked to the City Engineer and was im- pressed with his 10 year advanced planning program. 79th Avenue is in this plan, yet Mr. Fudali said that he was not aware of it. Mr. Fudali said that he had talked to these peo�le living in the area, and now the City of Fridley has entered into something that was a civil action with these people. Councilman Breider asked if he was objecting to the improvement, or the stipulations on the building permit. Mr. F'udali said that he objected to the improvement because of the restrictions on their building permit. If the City should come to the conclusion the stipulation is unwarranted, they would be happy to have the road. He said that he had no objection to their assessment on 79th Way west of Lincoln Street as they would be using that, only to the east of Lincolr� Street. He saic'i that they can build their development without 79th Way, but their project is not benefitted by the improvement. They would like to use 79th Way, but they are restricted, so they would object to the improvement. � Councilman Liebl said that it was a question of legality whether they could be assessed or not. Mr. Warren Caldwell sai.d that he was the owner of property iuunediately west of Lincoln Street. He asked if access would be permitted on 79th Way as far as his property is concerried. The City Engineer said that the zoning ordinance would restrict access up to a certain point. There would be one access because of the setback requirements. This would be a question answered when the building permit is asked for. ' ' ' REGLTLAR COUNGT � MEETING OF �.TANL7ARY 1�, _197t. PAGE 5 East Service Road of East River Road: Startinq from 1,000 Feet South of South Leg of Interstate #694 Interchange N E to Railroad Right of Way, Great Northern Industrial Center Piat, Outlot A: ' The Ci+�y Engineer said that this road is to serve Plywood Minnesota. They did not install curbing on the south side because it was not developed. Now there is a furniture warehouse going in and the proposal is to finish improving by , installing curbing on the south side. There seems to be some question in the minds of the Railroad if they want the improvement at this time. Wickes would like to have this improvement. � ' ' ' Howard Evans, Burlington Northern Railroad, said that they sent a letter to the Council asking that the work be deferred until it is needed. Possibly the work could be done to fulfill the wishes of Wickes, but the rest they would like to defer. MOTION kay Councilman Liebl to close the Public Hearing on Street Improvement Project 3t. 1971-1, Addendum #1. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote,all vating aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the hearing closed at 8:55 P.M. - ORDINANCE #472 - AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE OPE1tATION OP' SNOWMOBILES: The City Attorney said that he had drafted a proposed Ordinance basically using ' the Hennepin County model Ordinance with some changes. it has been adopted by a number of communities. The first restriction is the use of municipal streets. Municipal streets may be used only to get to and from designated places for snowmobiles to run, and direct route must be taken. This is intended to prevent ' operation of snowmobiles that would continue circling the block or run up and down the block. The intent is to compromise between total prohibition and co�nplete freedom of the use of the streets. The Hennepin County Ordinance provides options ' on hours and speed. Based on the suggestion of the Police Department and previous discussions, he suggested a 20 M.P.H. speed limit and operating hours froqn 7:00 A.M. until 10:00 P.M. in the evenings. Hennepin Count„y suggests 7:00 A.M. to � 11:00 P.M., but through discussions with the Council, it was changed fran 11:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. The Ordinance covers provisions of the State Statutes. ' ' , �_J l� � Councilman Liebl said that operation in ditches and in parks is permitted. The City Attorney said that this is the State law. This Ordinance incorporates all the State Statutes into one Ordinance for easy reference. Councilman Liebl pointed out that the snowmobiles would not be permitted within 100 feet of a sliding area o� skating rink. A lady in the audience said that her children get chased off the creek when skating. She said people need protection fran snowmobiles when walking in the parks. Councilman Kelshaw said that the speed limit is 10 M.P.H. when near frozen waters. The City Attorney said that the Ordinance does prohibit snow- mobiles on public frozen waters except those designated by the Council as authorized use. The question�this Ordinance raises is how are the violators to be kept in check. He suggested the possibility of asking the local snowmobile clubs to form some type of snow patrol. They will have to be responsible and regulate themselves. The snow patrol may serve by taking down numbers and turning them into the Police Department. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 1971 PAGE 6 Councilman Liebl said that the maximum penalty provided is $300 or 90 days. There should be something stipulated in regard to waterways. There was a question raised last time this was discussed. The City Attorney said that the municipality does have authority on frozen waters within limits. The use must be approved by the Conservation Commissioner. After.local approval is given., there should be an application made to the Conservation Department. • The Ci:�= would also have to have their concurrence for prohibition. A lady in the audience said that Minneapolis and Columbia Heights have banned them fro�n the City streets. She said that she lives in the suburbs hoping for a nice quiet place to live, sudc�enly there are all these snowmobiles out in the street. They belong in the parks, not in the street where there are children walking. There are not sidewalks in the City, so the children have to walk in the street. The streets were made for cars which are licensed by the State. Mayor Kirkham said that the Council has tried to answer all the requests for regulation by developing a law that everyone can live with. People that do own snowinobiles are allowed to use the streets only to get to designated places to run. If this law is abused, it may be that they will have to be banned, but he would prefer to try a compromise first. A lady in the audience said that she lives in Melody Manor and she is bothered by the adults that run back and forth in the street. Mayor Kirkham said that this Ordinance attempts to take all citizens of Fridley into consideration. They did not want to make the law too restrictive, but they still wanted to try to protect the children. With this Ordinance the children can be protected. If it does not work, they will be banned. A gentleman in the audience said that he has a snowmobile and he thought that the biggest problem is with the young people running them. He would like to see the parents made more responsible for them. The City Attorney said that the Ordinance does provide that no one under 14 years of age may operate them on streets or highways or make a direct crossing. They are not prohibited fran operating in open areas. Between 14 and 18 they may operate on the streets or make a direct crossing if they have a valid snowmobile safety certificate from the State. The owner of a vehicle is responsible for the operation. The State law states that municipalities cannot require a drivers license. Councilman Harris said that the City will have to rely on the people for compliarice. Mrs. Jensen, a visitor to the Meeting, said that the signs in Locke Park are ignored. The signs are small and stcuck in the bushes. She felt bigger signs were needed. MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to amend the Ordinance by adding Subdivision 6 to Section 4 regarding equipment. He suggested that there be required a 6' to 8' standard with a red flag, for visibility over the snowbanks. The City Attorney said that he would check with the State and add the correct wording. A lady in the audience asked if the creek is prohibited. Mayor Kirkhaan said yes, but a�ortion of Moore Lake is open for use. The lady said that they use the creek to get to a place to run to eliminate going in the street. ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 18 197i , PAGE 7 , The Acting City Manager said that the City recently purchased soane land in the ' north end of town just south of 85th Avenue. There is approximately 100 acres there and •there should be some publicity in the newspaper that this is an allowed place to run. A member of the audience asked if there is any pamphlet available on the C�_ty regulations. Mayor Kirkham said that when the Ordinance is passed, it could be made available at City Hall for interested citizens. The Acting City Manager said to the representatives of snowmobile clubs present that he would like to work with them for enforcement of this Ordinance. A member of the audience asked if it would be possible to extend the time limit to 11:00 P.M. on Saturdays and 5undays. Mayor Kirkham said that originally the limit was 9:30 P.M. and it was extended to 10:00 P.M. The Council reached a general agreement on the 10:00 P.M. limit. The visitor asked why the time could not be set back later on weekends. Mayor Kirkham said that they felt that it was better to keep the Ordinance consistant. A member of the audience said that it would be hard to sleep with snowmobiles running around until 12:00 Midnight. Mayor Kirkham added that operating on Moore Lake is allowed, but it has homes around the shore that would be infringed upon. Councilman Liebl pointed out that the people that petitioned for banning of the snowmobiles must be considered also. THE MOTION was seconded by.Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. A member o£ the audience said that he was concerned about enforcement. What is going to make this enforceable. Mayor Kirkham said that the City must depend on the people to be responsible. If necessary, a person would have to be willing to swear out a complaint. Councilman Liebl said that he must have received 50 calls on the nuisance. , People from other communities where snowmobiles are banned will be coming into Fridley. A visitor asked if they could be banned or limited in some way. The City Attorney said no. The visitor suggested the use of permits. The ' City Attorney said that they could not be banned from using the City streets. There could possibly be a permit to use designated areas. This would make it more difficult to enforce. , � � ' � ' Councilman Breider said that one of the main problems is enforcement. They would still have to be caught. No matter what the City does, it must depend greatly on the cooperation of the snowmobilers. He said that the City of Fridley is unique in that it has a large amount of open space. They should be allowed to use their snowmobiles as long as the privilege is not abused. If it is abused, they will be banned. This Ordinance depends on the snowmobilers themselves. He hoped that the snowmobile organizations would work together. A member of the audience said that all small motors should be banned at 10:00 P.M. This would include snowblowers, lawn mowers, etc. MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Ordinance #472 on second reading, waive the reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a roll call vote, Breider, Kelshaw, Kirkham, Liebl and Harris voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING O.r J73NUARY 18, 1971 PAGE 8 ' Mayor Kir_kham suggested that all the snQ,amobile-enthusiasts present adjourn to the Community Room for a meeting. DISCUSSION ON IMPROVEMENT OF EAST RIVER ROAD: Mayor Kirkham said that he was not ready to make a final decision as yet. tt- should be understood by the people abutting this area that this is a County road and it is essentially a County project. The Council got the message at the Public Hearing Meeting, but they still are not sure o�' the way to go concerning some of tlie alternates. The Council is obligated to make a recoirunendation to the County, but he did not feel that they were prepared at this time to make their recommendation. Councilman Breider said that during the course of last week he received a number of calls and is lead to believe there is still much misunderstanding. The people thought the Council would be voting tonight. The Council has heard the objections and it is their right to take the matter under advisement to look at these objections and come back with further modifications. East River Road has a long record of accidents, six in this stretch of highway. The statistics point to the i.mpact of this area. The suggestion was made that Fridley Park should be rezoned, which could be looked at. His suggestion was that a period of time be set aside on February 8, 1971 for the City Engineer to come back with further modifications. He said that he could not vote either way at this time. He recommended to the Council that they give the City Engineer until the second Meeting in February to come up with a new plan. Councilman Liebl said that he agreed with Councilman Breider that the Council should look at some alternates. He felt the three intersections with semaphores is a must. At this time he is opposed to widening East River Road because of the lack of right of way. He said that 80� of the road abuts residential usage. The Police Department has been patrolling East River Road more thoroughly lately. He suggested advising the citizens that there would be an unmarked Police car patrolling East River Road. He felt this would make an impression on the violators. He said that he agreed with the letter from School District #14 that the Council received. Once a plan is adopted for the south section, the improvement has to go all the way up to the city limits. If you follow step by step, what is going to be done north of Rice Creek; it is not feasible to have condemnations north of Rice Creek. He felt that it was imperative that the underpass on Mississippi be put in and the City get the lights. He pointed out that certain criteria must be met to get the Federal aid and he urqed cooperation with the Council. Mr. Richard Harris said that he has travelled East River Road and the crux of the matter seems to be as soon as you hit Minneapolis, the traffic comes to a halt. Minneapolis has finally put up no parking signs on the street. They are not going to do anything to help. It is about time a traffic pattern is laid out to go into and out of Minneapolis. Somewhere along the line the Commissioners are going to be asked to consider East River Road all the way up to Coon Rapids Shopping Center. He felt that the Metropolitan Council should be put to work on the problem. Mayor Kirkham said that they are not tryi_ng to improve East River Road to make it a better artery, but rather to improve safety. Since 1963 there have been 6 deaths on this stretch and this is the Council's immediate concern. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 18, ]971 PAGE 9 Mr. George Danielson said that since Mik� O'Bannon has been County Commissioner, the plowing and sanding on East River Road has been improved 100�. This should eliminate the problem. Regarding the 6 deaths, he questioned how many had. consumed alcohol. He said thank you to all the people for taking an interes� in this situation. A member of the audience said that Anoka County pinched pennies when they put in East River Road, and again when it was up-graded. He hoped the Council would look at this plan very thoroughly. He pointed out that you cannot have the Police Department out on East River Road 24 hours a day. A lady in the audience said that at the last meeting the matter of funding was brought up. She asked how it was to be. Mayor Kirklzam said as far as the individual's property is concerned the abutting property owner will pay the regular amount for a residential street. Additional costs above that will come from elsewhere. The regular assessment procedure would be followed, and the property owner would pay according to front footage. He added that it is not known what this is going to cost, but he assured her that she would not pay any more than for a normal residential street. The lady then brought _forward a petition and presented it to Mayor Kirkham. PETITION N0. 7-1971 - IN OPPOSITION TO IMPROVEMENT OF EAST RIVER ROAD: MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive Petition #7-1971. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Kirkham said that there would be no final decision tonight. He wanted to make sure all the alternates were considered. He said that he valued all the comments that have been made and they will be taken into consideration. He agreed with Councilman Breider's suggestion to have it back on the Agenda February 8, 1971. Councilman Kelshaw said that there has been a tremendous study of this area. He said that he understood that the City cannot lower the speed limit on East River Road. Mr. Mike O'Bannon, County Commissioner said that is correct. It is lowered by the State upon the recommendation of the County. Councilman Kelshaw said that he has talked to a number of people and his feeling is that he would like to see the aesthetic value of East River Road be maintained. It is true there is some industry north of I. 694, but it is primarily a residential street. He asked that Mr. O'Bannon take back to the County the request to get the State to authorize lowering the speed limit and put up the semaphores. He urged preserving the aesthetics of East River Road and the discouraging of using East River Road as a thoroughfare. He said that he would go along with the people and the area should be maintained. Mr. Mike 0'Bannon said that he also has been called many times. He said that he was going to introduce a resolution the next day to lower the speed limit on East River Road. This in turn has to be supplied to the State. He said that he believed that they could get the speed limit lowered to 35 M.P.H. He said that he was also in favor of the semaphores for East River Road. As far as the improvement of East River Road is concerned, there are Federal funds committed for this. He agreed that the underpass on Mississippi Street is long overdue, and he hoped that it would be constructed by 1972. He said that he agreed with the people east of East River�Road when you cut off their access, then ask them to put in Ashton, it is wrong. He said that tomorrow, he is going to ask for a study to be made from Rice Creek to Coon Rapids. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING UF JANUARY 18,1971 PAGE 10 Councilman Breider said that Councilman Liebl and Commissioner 0'Bannon have spoken on lowering the speed limit. He wondered if this would not give people a false feeling of security. He said that he has travelled up East River Road and passed a squad car and all the cars were going at 40 M.P.H., but by the time they get to the light at Mississippi, they would be going at 55 M.P.H. He said that he could not ask a Patrolman to step out of his squad car on East Ri�=er Road to give a ticket without the shoulders. Mr. 0'Bannon said that he would not get out of his car with the cars going 60 M.P.H. either. He will ask that the speed limit be lowered. Mayor Kirkham said that he could not think that would put an end to the problem. A member of the audience asked why the signal at Robert Louis Stevenson School is not working all the time. If it was fully activated, it would slow down traffic. The City Engineer said that the signal at present does not have equipment for a fully activated signal and trips only when a car comes from the school. The proposed signal would be fully activated. The visitor said that the neW signal would solve about 80$ of the traffic problems. A member of the audience urged the Council to consider Councilman Kelshaw's statement. He too is concerned about the aesthetic quality of East River Road. This would be a unique opportunity to attempt to i.mprove the beauty of the road. Widening the road would encouraqe use of the road. The City of Fridley is already cut up by major highways. There are schools and parks along East River Road. He felt that widening the road would be inducinq traffic to use it. Mayor Kirkham said that the street would be widened from curb to curb, yes, but there would be no increase in the number of driving lanes. Widening the road would allow for shoulders to allow the Police Department to pull violators off the road safely. It would not increase the flow of traffic, just increase the safety. The visitor said that this would suggest to the drivers t;lzat by the appearance, it is a thoroughfare. The City Engineer said that there would be no formal notice sent out of the Meeting February 8th, and asked that �tY�e people present tonight inform their neighbors. A member of the audience said that he understood that this is a County project. He wondered how much influence the City had with the County. Mayor Kirkham said that it was a cooperative effort to try to improve safety. Mr. George Danielson said that the people could resort to their Legislators and Senators, and that the people could write to them requesting that this money not be spent. Z'his project can be stopped. RECESSs Mayor Kirkham declared a recess at 10:15 P.M. COMPLAINT OF MR. AND MRS. DENNIS SCHROEDEB RELATIVE TO PLAYING HOCKEY IN SUMMIT MANOR PARK: " The Acting City Manager said that a temporary fence has been put up. Mr. Dennis Schroeder asked what was the permanent solution. He would like to see no hockey playing there whatsoever. Mayor Kirkham said that it was allowed in response to the wishes of the people in the area that would like their ch�ildren to be allowed to play hockey at aertain times. This would allow a time for the smaller chil.dren to skate al�q. M,r• Schroed�r pointed out that none of the people living next to the park signed the petition. He said that the people had no consideration. � , , L� RE:�OLAR GOU�ICIA. MEF.TING CF JANCIA�2Y 1�, a97?. PAGE 11 Councilman Liebl said that a higher fence was asked for to protect the h�nes by the park. This has been done. He was told by the Parks and Recreation Directar that the people have said that they would provide supervision since there is no attendant and no warming house. He said that the Parks Director i� tx��_ng to get some land on the west side of Main Street to make a hoc�z�y rink. � Mr. Schroeder said that the older children are using the fence as a backstop to see if they can get their pucks over the fence. Zf one goes over, there will be a law suit. The older children at any time can be seen playing hockey and there has been no supervision. The Acting City Manager said that they have asked Burlington Northern for permission to flood a portion of their property for a hockey rink. He said that he has also written a letter to them in regard to a long term lease on their property so that it can be used for hockey, softball, baseball and football. Burlington Northern has asked that the City supply maps and a legal description which he did today. It is hoped that this can be used for the balance of the 1971 season, then the hockey playing would be moved fran Sumanit Square to the new area. Mrs. Schroeder said that they have had extensive damage to their home. A puck went through their window just after their small child was standing at that window. When you have to live in fear in your own home, no fence that could be put up is high enough. There are still children playing in the back yard. On the weekends there is hockey playing all day long. The smaller children have a right to the skating rink too, but they are in danger. It was pointed out that the hookey playing was only to be between 8:00 P.M. and 9:30 P.M. Mayor Kirkham said that the people have been given a chance to play hockey at specified times and they have abused their privilege. Mrs. �chro�der said that the teen agers should not be allowed to chase off the littler children. The rink just is not large enough. 5he said that she volunteered to take the children to a hockey rink to play. Mayor Kirkham said that it was his feeling that these children have to suffer the consequences of their abusing their privilege and hockey playing should be banned. Mrs. Schroeder asked what recourse they had if the hockey playing continues. ' Mayor Kirkham said that this is a problem on all the parks. The City Attorney said that a complaint would have to be made out and filed with Anoka County. It would be difficult to enforce. ' r ' � ' Councilman Harris said that he is a member of the Hockey Association and they encourage the children to go skating at other times than regular play for practice, but they are encouraged to use only the rinks that have adequate facilities. He said that they try to keep them off the rinks where there is no supervision. Hockey should be permitted only where there is adequate facilities. The City is trying to provide something in this general area. Hockey is not compatible with regular skating. Mrs. Schroeder said that these people signing the petition have told the City they would police it, but there has not been one person down there to request that the rules be followed. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY ]�8, �97_ PAGE 12 MOTION by Councilman Harris to rescind previous Council action and not allow hockey playing on the Summit Square rink, to instruct the Administration to notify the signers of the petition that hockey playing is no longer allowed, and continue negotiations with Burlington Northern for the use of their property for park purposes. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, al.li voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING COAiTRACT - SHELTER BUILDING AND WARMING HOUSE: (Bids opened January 18, 1971 at 11:30 A.M.) Completion Planholder Base Bid Alternate Date Cliff Anderson Box 37 Excelsior, Minn. 55331 $10,306.00 As specified Boda Construction +$25, for 125,000 11260 Buchannan Rd. NE B.T.U.Furnace Minneapolis, Minn. 55433 $7,920.00 -$25.00 - Permit 30 Days Elview Construction 7601 73rd Avenue N. Minneapolis, Minn. 55428 $8,747.00 As specified Erection & Maintenance 11900 Wayzate �oulevard Minneapolis, Minn. 55426 $8,974.00 May 1, 1971 Gladstone Improvement Co. 1315 Frost Avenue St . Paul, Minn. 55109 D.W. Harstad Company 7101 Highway 65 Fridley, Minn. 55432 Keyway Builders, Inc. 11410 South Oak Vale Rd. Minneapolis, Minn. 55343 James Leck Company 322 West 61st Street Minneapolis, Minn. 55419 Norm Ganz Fencing 5709 Wilshire $oulevard Crystal, Minn. 55429 Orvedahl Construction 7711 Country Club Drive Golden Valley, Minn. 55427 $10,853.00 $10,950.00 $9,949.00 $10,500.00 $8,878.80 $11,900.00 As specified As specified As specified May 15, 1971 As specified 120 days ' , , � � ' L� ' L� ' r C� ' , ' ' , , � � I � REGULAR COUNCII. MEETING OF JANUARY 1£3� 1971 BIDS CONTINUED: I' Planholder Base Bid Alternate S.G. Pearson Company $ Leonard Samuelson 801 2nd Avenue North Minneapolis, Minn. 55401 $9,979.00 Random, Inc. 700 77th Street Circle Pines, Minn. R'Lee Construction Co. 3307 North Hwy, 100 Minneapolis, Minn. 55422 Roger Sheehy Company 4150 Central Ave. N.E. Minneapolis, Minn. 55421 UNSCO, Inc. 4952 West Broadway Minneapolis, Minn. 55429 Wade Construction 2850 Pilot Knob Road St. Paul, Minn. 55118 $10,980.00 $11,195.00 $11,400.00 $13,666.00 $14,395.00 +$80.00 PAGE 13 Completion Date As specified As specified As specified As specified 120 Days As specified The Acting City Manager said that this would be located in the Commons Park area on school property near 61st Avenue. Councilman Harris asked if the City has received permission to construct a permanent structure. The Acting City Manager said that the�Parks Director has taken care of this. The building is constructed so that it can be moved at some future time if it is necessary. Councilman Harris asked if all the necessary facilities are in the building and the Acting City Manager said yes. MoTION by Councilman Harris to award the bid for a shelter building and warming � house to Boda Construction Company in the amount of $7,920.00. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. � � ' ' ' CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR PRO TEM AND MEMBERS TO THE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMITTEE: Mayor Kirkham said that traditionally the Mayor Pro tem has been the Councilman at Large as he is the o�ily other Council Member elected by the whole City. MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to appoint Councilman at Large David O. Harris as Mayor Pro tem. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, Harris, Breider, Kelshaw and Kirkham voting aye, Liebl voting nay, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY tg, �?' PAGE 14 � � Mayor Kirkham said that he would like to make the following appointments to the Human Relations Committee. Ward One Replaced Member Mrs. Jordis Mittelstadt 6940 Hickory Drive N.E. Andrew Kohlan 236 Rice Creek Boulevard Ward Two Stephen A. Kachina 6476 Dellwood Drive Ward Three John R. Ivers 6271 Trinity Drive At Large Rev. Mark Denyes 7460 Van Buren N.E. Robert L. Buckley 54 Locke Lake Road New Member Nlrs. Nick Koropchak iBarbara) 7144 R.iverview Terrace Mr. Gene Parsons 380 Rice Creek Terrace Mr. Paul Shaw 6380 Madison Street N.E. Mr. John ivers 6271 Trinity Drive Rev. Douglas M. Henderson 6175 Central Avenue N.E. Mrs. Gilbert Stenberg (Eileen) 6060 Woody Lane Mayor Kirkham said that the appointments to Human Relations Committee are made by the Mayor with the consent of 4/5 of the Council. MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the appointments. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #9-1971 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING, REAPPOINTING, AND CONFIRMING MEMBERS TO CON�MISSIONS, BOARDS� AND SUBCOMMITTEES FOR THE YERR 1971: TYie Council pointed out that they would like to have the appointment of Tim Breider to the Joint Law Enforcement Council added to the Resolution with Councilman Kelshaw the alternate. MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #9-1971. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. Councilman Liebl said that he wished the record to show on the vote for the Resolution that he would vote nay for that portion appointing Councilman Harris Mayor Pro tem. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL PLANT WEST OF MINNEAPOLIS HOUSE FURNISHINGS STORE ON MISSISSIPPI STREET. REQUEST BY RAO CORPORATIONe The City Engineer said that this pXoposed developm�nt is along Mississippi Street between Minneapolis House Furnishings and the railroad tracks. There is � REGUTJAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 1971 PAGE 15 ' close to �ive acres of property. Al1 the property up to Main Street is zoned ' industrial and east is commercial. On Page 20 of the Agenda there is the proposed layout of the building�. The plant is engaged primarily in the manu- facture of custom sheet metal shapes, stampings and stamping assemblies. � Their interest in coming before the Council is, they want to know that this type of industry is satisfactory in this type of zoning. There may be ftature expansion onto the commercial property and in that case they would have to rezone and they would like to know that this would be looked favorably upon. ' There is a state aid road designation that would connect onto Main Street that could not be put in if the plant is allowed. Their representatives, Mr. Robert Olson, Jr. and Sr. are present ton;�ght. Mayor Kirkham said that this would be an excellent opportunity to close the access to Mississippi Street. The advantage would be to keep traffic out of the residential area. This would help to keep the residential area to the south residential only. The City Engineer said that he has reviewed their plan and they want to be sure they would be welcome in Fridley and if they move�into the City, they would not have any future problems. Their business makes no noise or smoke and there would not be a heavy amount of traffic generated. The truck traffic would be very minimal. Councilman Breider asked if they do any plating. Mr. Robert Olson Sr. said no. The painting and plating is done by other contractors. Councilman Kelshaw asked what size the trmcks would be. Mr. O1son Sr. said normal trucks would be hauling materials in and out. There would be 4 to 6 trucks a day. Occasionally there would be a flat bed coming in, but that would not average one a week. The trucks would be smaller trucks and most of their traffic would be to Onans. He said that the satisfaction of Onans with Fridley is one of the reasons for their proposed relocation in Fridley. He said that they would not be coming in here if they did not think they would make good neighboxs. They want to maintain the wooded area and they intend to keep the truck t�affic toward the railroad right of way. They did not intend their plant to be an eyesore. Councilman Liebl asked if the street would not have to have a Public Hearing for the vacation. The City Engineer said that the street right of way was never acquired, so it would just be a matter of taking off the state aid designation. Councilman Harris said welcome to the community and that it sounded like they would be a good neighbor and an asset to the cocnmunity. The City Engineer said that if they expand in the future to double their building from their proposal on Page 20 of the Agenda, 100' of the building would be on commercial zoning and would necessitate rezoning. Councilman Breider wondered if this Council could commit themselves until the rezoning was c�npleted. Councilman Harris said that they hoped to grow to utilize the property. He was sure that they understand that the Council would be bound to qo through the legal procedure of the Public Hearing for the rezoning. Mr. Robert Olson Sr. said that after the rezoning, there would still be about 150' of c�unercial area left open. He added that they are still about two years away from construction. Councilman Breider pointed out that the Council may be changed by the ti.me they want their rezoning. Councilman Harris said that all they need at this time is concept approval. REGULAR COUNCII� MEETII`JG OF JANUAR�1 '.C�; 1`�i'. PAGE 16 � ❑ MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the concept of RAO as outlined in the letter received January 18, 1971 for the proposed plan for building in the area designated as Lowell's Addition. Acceptance for concurrence of the concept approval does not remove the responsibility of the Council to have the Public Hearing for the rezoning if the additional land area is needed. The petition would have to meet the rezoning requirements. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RE UEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COML'LETE ITEMS SPELLED OUT IN THE AGREEMENT FOR REZONING ALONG 69TH AVENUE _(ZOA #69-08A): The City Engineer said that the first reading of the Ordinance has been held and if the gentleman would give a 60' strip of land and acquire Outlot 1 and donate it to the City, the second reading would be held. He has been unable to acquire the property. The gentleman who owns the property to the west is present in the audience. The City has been working to develop park land east of Central. The City does own parcels to the west. He recommended that the first reading be gone through again. A4r. Floyd Foslien, 3345 University Avenue N.E., said that he was at the Planning Commission Meeting some time ago and this is new to him. He got a call last week asking about the property. He said that he understood that the rezoning was contingent upon Mr. Edward Perry obtaining his land. He said that he does own land adjacent to his. He believed that it was Outlot #1 that the City was interested in obtaining. There are two lots ne.ar there that are high enough to support housing. He said that he mention to Mr. Perry that maybe something could be worked out if his interest was rezoning the land adjacent to his. If there is interest, he would get in touch with him. The City Engineer showed the whole area on the overhead projector and ex- plained that the area shown in green is the area the City is interested in for park land. Councilman Harris said that this land is unbuildable for hames, and that it is beautiful land. Mr. Foslien said that Lots 10 and 11 could be used for building homes. The City Engineer said that if Mr. Foslien is willing to proceed and give the necessary land, he should make an application for rezoning and the City would work with him to get control of Outlot 1. He said that his recommendation is to deny the time extension request and go through the first reading of the Ordinance again. Councilman Harris asked how big the parcel of land was that Mr. Foslien had. Mr. Foslien replied that it is about 200' wide. The Acting City Manager asked how long after the Public Hearing could the first reading be held. Can the first reading be held again without another Public Hearing? The City Attorney said that he would think that it would require another Public Hearing. The Council has been using the policy of 6 months between the first and second reading. He asked when the first reading was. Councilman Liebl said that it was in October, 1969. He added that he thought that he felt that the City Engineer's recommendation was correct and that both of the properties should be done together. Mr. Foslien said that he was not sure whether he would offer it for sale to Mr. Perry or whether he would build on it himself. He said that his work is ' REGULAR COUNCIL ivtEETING OF JANUP�.�.E?Y :.e3, 7�q71 PAGE 17 ' apartment building and that he has built a 109 unit apartment complex that was ' F.H.A, approved. Councilman Harris commented that the building would have to be a long narrow structure. Mr. Foslien said that the construction would prob- ably have the parking up near 69th to utilize the creek aesthetically. M�aDa� ' Kirkham asked Mr. Foslien if he intended to petition for rezonin9. Mr. Foslien said that he may. Councilman Harris told him that if he makes a petition for rezoning, the Council would be glad to hear it. MOTTON by Councilman Harris to deny the request for extension of time for Rezoning ZOA #69-08A. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF FLOOD INSURANCE INFORMATION: Councilman Liebl said that he thought they should inform the people before the City should designate the area as a flood plain. This would be a help to these people but it would also restrict the area. Councilman Harris asked what restrictions there would be on the area. The City Engineer said that the area would have to be designated a flood plain, and if so, there would be restrictions on building. Most of the homes in Riverview Heights are protected somewhat by the elevated roadway, but there are about eight homes south of 79th which may benefit. MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the information supplied by the City Engineer and the Planning Assistant. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION REGARDING 77TH AND 79TH AVEI�TUE RAILROAD CROSSING AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS: Councilman Breider said that he had asked that this be put on the Agenda in response to a petition regarding the crossings. The City Engineer said that recently there was a serious accident at the 77th Avenue crossing causing three deaths. Councilman Harris said that he understood that the car ran into the train. The City Engineer said that the crossing is marked with a stop sign. The accident happened at night so there were train lights and the train whistles for the crossing, but still the car ran into the train. The general feeling was that the windows of the car were fogged. There are no other re- corded accidents at this crossing. The Council action would be to hold a Public Hearing to see if this crossing should be closed. If eliminated, the application would have to go to the Public Service Commission. Councilman Breider asked when the Public Hearing could be held. The City Engineer said that he.would be ready in March. Councilman Harris said that they would have to take into consideration the existing land use. He asked if there was a railroad crossing near Liberty Street and the City Engineer said yes, there is no,warning sign. Councilman Harris said that the parcel to the east would then have no access and it would be ari isolated 40 acres. The City Engineer said that the plans are to relocate the crossings at 79th Avenue and 83rd Avenue. There is an Ashton connection. Mr. Richard Harris said that taking out the 77th Avenue crossing would isolate a few people. There are a few homes in there. He felt that if the 77th Avenue crossing is eliminated, there would have to be something done about connecting 79th Avenue with University. The 79th Avenue crossing would open the area up. REGULAR COLTNCIL MEETING OI' JANUARY ?.� ,�.°7I PAGE 18 Councilman Breider agreed that this would aerate the area, however, he would not care to aerate that area onto East River Road. He did not want to see more truck traffic generated for East River Road. He said that he would like to see the traffic go to University Avenue at 83rd Avenue. Councilman Harris said that he assumed that people living in this area would orientate themselve� toward East River Road. Councilman Breider said that nobody would try to cross over from East River Road to University Avenue once the area gets developed with industry. Mr. Richard Harris said that Onaway Addition does not lend itself to large corporation use because it is an old plat and it is cut up into small parcels. Councilman Breider said that if it is opened up to industrial use there would be a steady stream of traffic trying to get out at 79th Avenue. He suggested that it would behoove the Council to obtain Bloomington and Edina's traffic study patterns. They have just done some work in this area. MOTION by Councilman Breider to hold the Public Hearing for the closing of the 77th Avenue crossing at the Public Hearing Meeting in March. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Councilman Harx�is said that he would hate to set the Public Hearing date, then not have the information available. He would rather get the information first. Councilman Breider asked if the City Engineer could have the information froan Bloomington and Edina by the first Meeting in February. The City Engineer said that he would try to get the information by then. A member of the audience said that with a crossing at Osborne Road, 79th Avenue and 83rd Avenue there should not be any congestion. He said that he has done traffic studies. MOTION WITHDRAWN by Councilman Breider with the agreement of Councilman Liebl. MOTION by Councilman Breider to direct the City Engineer to supply the Council with information at the next Regular Council Meeting. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimouSly. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE EXISTING CODE REQUIRING GARI�GES WITH 5INGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND OTHER APPURTENANT INFORMATION: Councilman Harris said that he wished to be brought up to date in regard to the requirement for garages. There have been instances where the home is placed in the center of the lot, then the people must come back for a variance when they want to build a garage. The City Engineer said that there are certain lots not suited for attached garages. Last year there were 41 permits issued for single family homes and there was only one that did not have an attached garage. This was for a substandard lot in Riverview Heights, and there was no possible way there could be an attached garage built. The forty permits were with attached garages. Councilman xarris questioned why there was not the same terminology in Section 2, A& B. The City Engineer said that it was felt that if there was a lot split granted, there should be additional restrictions. Councilman Harris said that he would encourage the building of attached garages. The City Engineer said that with all new homes, they are encouraged to build the attached garage and there has been no problem. The Acting City Manager wondered if they should not ' 1 ❑ ' ' �� i� � ' u ' i u ' , �I� u , ' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 18� .19?Z PAGE 19 ' be double garages. In many instances with an older home with a single attached ' garage, the home owner is forced to rebuild to gain a double garage. The City Engineer pointed out that before passage ot the Loning Or��inance, there was no requirement for an attached garage so this i.s a big 7ump for the City. ' � ' Mayor Kirkham commented that there is no way of adding onto his garage to make it a double, and he wished that it had been a requirement when his house was built. MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the information from the City Engineer and instruct that it be put back on the Agenda at the next Regular Meeting. Secondsd by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF CERTAIN RIGHT OF WAY ALONG T.H. #47 EAST SERVICE , ROAD TO FACILITATE ACQUISITION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR SERVICE ROAD LOOPBACKS AT 61ST AVENUE AND 57TH AVENUE. INTERSECTION WITH T.H. #47 AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE: � ' 1 , ' MOTION by Councilman Liebl to set the Public Hearing for the vacation of property for the loopbacks for February 8, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, a21 voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSID$RATION OF ACOUISITION OF ACCES� E:ASEMENT TO 1152 NORTON AVENUE: The City Engineer explained that there are two homes using a common driveway. The necessity for an access easement comes about because of a neighborhood fued. Mr. Louis Gray is asking $150 for the easement. MOTION by Councilman Liebl to authorize acquisition of the easement from Mr. Louis Gray for $150.00. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #10-1971 , AND ESTIMATES OF THE LOCKE I,AKE DAM : � ' � , A RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS COSTS THEREOF: REPAIR, REJUVENATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF The City Engineer said that he has already made a�eport to the Council in reqard to the improvement of Locke Lake Dam. It will take $5200 for the i.mmediate necessary repairs; another 515,000 for rejuvenation and $52,000 for totally rebuilding the dam. He questioned how the Council would handle the funding. Should it be assessed, and if so, how much? The City Attorney said that the people on the lake would be benefitting from the rejuvenation of the dam and should be assessed. Councilman Liebl said that he did not feel that the reconstruction should come out of general funds except for tha $5200 for the repair wor}c, as that is necessary maintenance. Mayor. Kirkham said that the whole City does benefit from the lake, but the lions share of the benefit is with the people living on the lake. The City Engineer said that the $5200 is immediately necessary as preventive ' mainter�ance. Whether to put in the improvement at $15,000 or $52,000 would be the people's choice, but he would have to recommend the $15,000 job as the other is very expensive. ' REGULAR COiJAICTL MEEsTN� !_?:G' TA?�?iIJ,??v '.'��, �_3`:'.i PAGE 20 Councilman Harris said that this dam has been the.re for mar.y years. The people pay an additional amount in taxes for having lakeshore property and they would not like to lose it. Councilman Breider felt that the $15,000 or $52,000 would have to be assessed, but the $5200 would be considered maintenance and paid by City funds. He added that it could be considered the same as a strpe.t. The maintenance funds come from the City, but the improvement is assessed. Mayor Kirkham asked if there is $5200 available. The Acting City Manager said that there is no specific money provided, but there is the emergency fund. He added that if the dam is completely redone, it would be hand.led like any other improvement project. MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #10-1971 and further authorize $5200 foY the repair to be borne by general City maintenance funds. The City will hold the Public Hearing and make it known to the people that the maintenance will not be yearly, but only once, and the further rejuvenation will be assessed. The motion was seconded and upon a voipe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. The City Engineer pointed out that the future problems will be increasing because of the increased flow of water as the area upstream develops. RESOLUTION #11-1971 - A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN II�IPROVEMENTS: REPAIR, REJWENATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF LOCKE LAKE DAM: MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #11-1971. The motion was seconded and upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor.Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #12-1971 - A RESOLUTION Oi2DERING PRELIMINARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1970-4, ADDENDUM #3: MOTION by Councilman Fiarris to adopt Resolution #12-1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #13-1971 - A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC HE�RING ON THE MATTER OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1970-4, ADDENDUM #3: MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Resolution #13-1971. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION #14-1971 - A RES�LUTION AUTHORIZING AI�1D DZRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOT 7, BL�CK l, ERCO'S 1ST ADDITION: MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #14-1971. Seconded by Council- man Kelshaw. Upon a voice vc�te, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. REGUTAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 197� PAGE 21 RESOLUTIOIV #15-1971 -& RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING AND CQMBINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON IATS 6 THROUGH 10, BLOCK 8, SPRING BROOK PARK ADDITION: MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #15-1971. Seconded by Cuuncilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham de- clared the motion carried unani.mously. CONFIRMATION OF EI,ECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICERS TO THE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: Assistant Chiefs Captains A�rthur Olson Lawrence Peka LeRoy Blomster Merle Longerbone Tom Kelly Secretary Vern Barnes Chief of Fire Prevention Bureau Trustee - 3 Year Term Charles McKusick Assistant Chief of the Fire Prevention Bureau Robert D. Aldrich Edward Ellis MOTION by Councilman Liebl to confirm the elected and appointed officers of the Fire Department. 5econded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve payment of General Claims #24107 through #24219 and Liquor Claims #5164 through #5234. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. LICENSES: Multiple Dwelling Name LeRoy W. Arew 265 Griggs-Midway Sldg. St. Paul, Minn. Service 5tat�on Michaelson Shell Service 7610 University Avenue Fxidley, Minnesota Address 1441 73rd Avenue N.E. By: Leslie Michaelson Units Fee 18 $18.00 Approved B� _ Building Inspector Fire Inspector � REGULAR COiINCIL MEETING OF ��NU�1:t�' ic , I971 PA GE 22 LICENSES CONTINUED: General Contractor Approved By Naugle-Leck, Inc. 714 Baker Building Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Mark J. Dougall Building Inspector White Oak Builders, Inc. 5114 Long Lake Road New Brighton, Minnesota By: Thomas Swanson Building Inspector Boda Construction Company 11260 Buchannan Road N.E. Blaine, Minnesota By: Thomas Boda Building Inspector MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the licenses as presented. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMATES: Samuel D. Finkelstein 1217 Foshay Tower Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Costs in respect to Parcel 3000 being deleted from condemnation. Fridley Condemnation #31257, North Park $ 500.00 Minn-Kota Excavation Co. Osseo Minnesota PARTIAL E;�timate #6 for Street Improvement Project St. 1970-1 $ 8,280.01 Berglund-Johnson, Inc. Excelsior Minnesota 55331 PARTIAL Estimate #7 for Water Improvement Project No. 95, Schedule B $18,647.00 Minn-Kota Excavation Co. osseo Minnesota PARTIAL Estimate #5 for Street Improvement Project St. 1970-2 $ 927.95 � � LJ � � � , � REGUL,AR CGUNCIL ;+lEETIDI� OF Jt�TdUARY 18, 1971 Comstock and Davis, Inc. Consulting Engineers 1446 County Road "J" M�nneapolis, Minnesota 55432 For the furnishing of resident inspection and resident supervision for the staking out of the following construction work: PARTIAL Estimate #15 for Water Improvement Project No. 94 from November 2 through December 31, 1970 pARTIAL Estimate #2 for Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 100 from November 30 through December 31, 1970 PARTIAL Estimate #8 for Water Improvement Project No. 95, Schedule B from November 30 through December 31, 1970 PAGE 23 $ 92.47 $ 426.40 $1,833.13 � MOTION by Councilman Liebl to approve payment of the estimates as presented. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. � � � I ' COMMUNICATIONS: A. NORTHERN STATES POWER: INSTALLATION OF ST.REET LIGHTS: MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the com¢nunication fran Northern States Power dated January 11, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion caxried unaniunously. GEORGE BALTHAZOR, DOUBLE BUNGALOW, 1374 I3IGHWAY #100: Councilman Kelshaw reported that he had received a call questioning the status of this property. He believed that there were sti].1 three families residing there. The Council directed that this be researched and brought back at the next Regular Council Meeting. � ADJOURNMENT: � u ' ' There being no further business, Mayor Kirkham declared the Regular Council Meeting of January 18, 1971 adjourned at 12:50 A.M. Res ectfully submitted, �� .rZi'.�/� °.� Juel Mercer Secretary to the C�ty Council Jack O. Kirkham Mayor ' � ' �. � I � I � I , I � I � I � � � ' i � ORDINANCE � � � AN QRDINANrE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESO'TA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN�ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: SECTION �, Appendix D nf the City Code of Fridley i� amended aa hereinafter indic$ted. S�CTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and tht City of Fridley and described ae: That portion of the East Half of the Southea�t Quarter of Section 24, lying North of Interatate xo. 694. T-30, R-24, city of Fridley, councy of Anoka, Minnesota, Ia hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known as R-3A (apartments only). SEGTION 3. That the Zoning Adminietrator is directed to change the offi�ial zoning map to ahow said tract or area from zoned M s[rict R-1 (aingle family dwe�linga) to R-3A (apartments only). PASSED $Y THE CITY OOUNCIL Op TfiE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS / � � i DAY OF , 1971. � � , � � ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham Public Hearing: Sevtember �4 1970 Firat Reading: Octobe 5 197Q Sacond Reading: �_�� Publish . . . ____ ; _� ,� . � Ag�`e�:nent between Acres Inc� �T1C� the City of Fridley SV� i • �I `�� is • NQBB � �' � us P `" � , '••.Y�E� iQ ` r'�(�/J\� �� ir I.i>iEN � `. {/ I ..� , � �-� :�-�: .W�-,� � � , ,,; .. b� ,:t � _ �Y �, c.•��,. -�F :: �< 3� `�' '�'-�� S 9� �.; , na9� , I i°�; ,: -:.,._ .r� - —. . - - �, n (•M c rif �.' , =� C•� �) `., , 'y'n��F� �. � ' . ...i;.1i;� ' `�^ �� 1 `• � � �:�, •- . n'. �'jr,), -`'^ -r� , �a . � �4 `i t-' r � �E� i . •7 �� P�� r r �� s< � � • -� � 900v0 ��1� EXHIBIT 'A' ET M�ss�s�ilPl • , y � I tiry ... �o , . .. ��.. ,. -- __ F;. . �� . i � ,p;.� -r! 8 ,�y --� � �� „ ts . ti ' � ,o � „ pJO� F . � i.. . �� \ ' N" ' � .�. ♦ �_, �,�. - : �_� r; � C �� :-.-_ 1.°- I � , - .. ,4. �� i . � J R-► '` " �F»r, � :. ' ' . arvE ��►�/ Q ..y� . I . � !� oc w��.:aE�r �2��.�� ° � , r�'�' ,�, .1/ %LL �.-.. '3 t�" : '� . ,� � / 7 '� S'�: �, • n °✓1/f' O� ANO �� oi-t • .v� ,. t,� -�`�.J �GAriDE�4 '� . . ,� � ELEU ' � I �� , � � � �:r F ~ d� ., t y�� f� - ., ti. I __ U I � �y N 1 p .r ' . �r �. , �(� = ST� � f M20P0 � Q ' i � - 5.• PA.' �>� l�� t-�; ' I ; DEpI ,{�(0. � \ � � G1tACE CA7HOUC � 4-0 � ` � MIGM SCNOCL � �" � ��" +� r 'K. J� i j -��? � � , �r � I �� R y Bi11ma. : �` ,� .,- � t4s � � � � ��" �— f - ' �.,� r '. �` ;� � I .. 50 �5i - � -� ( � , a ��i�•�. ° � - . � n•r,�va. ,. '� , WIZ SE�'y SEC. 24 I _ � . —` E / SE� SEC 24 --- ��,, _ iJ i � . /4rN f — / urL R i.>= "'�� °, �1 '-�' � Lv �'. � T � ST ,'i� Gv a ;.:. ' j` s srr ! "• aao��o�{ :? � ' — � ' 1 D ; . �s,. :.7'k+k=�-� .�� 3 �ydar�ncn2 - ; •'T- �F. � � �\i' _ � /RO?OSED EASE.NENT �- I � /. Rry��r;� _��;J.. �;�� _ � . , -� PROPOSeD � � _ _ --- ----�---_- -- - 7 � < <_�-----' � '`�?l �p4��(: � �� 120 1�SIOENTI4L `- -.RE20NING "- -- --- -----� ,',�� ` ��y� � y�q , Q � TO SIIVEN L4KE RD.^ y' � � `�r.�� E- �Q�; .4 � � I; 10T5 . fROM R-� I � ` ; S�g J �:j. �_. % ' /� %' TO R-34 H L.�_� � y+ !IF/hi P %�11REyr�I��E �a :' . � �:lT(ii Z � 'VCJ � ..�. 5 rP 16.1/Cf�.?N� * i �1 i �� / ' ^ �� J � � ' �� ' / ,� �' t�.NK �� ' � I• .HEIGN� �H i�VW�'er� b Owneri H ` _ _ \� \� f _��~ . tf'y�,AY � \ v l.'� \\ - - } A� �In . Acres In . �� ' ' �I ... .��\� !-�� _ : .... \\. . \ z.,W�e� � ' ..., `� � �� aoa r c� S �d � L%S.'1� � � � � i . � �• ' �� "a� \\, ��rw.:' �{� � (� ; (, � /0 � 7 �. ♦��♦ t _ � .,.. •�� , , , � �,- �:�� , .,... � � � � �_ �"� �—r- ; �„��Fi�` . � �� .t �"�}- � •• � G _ ♦ .` / 4 �\,._��•L ;;-�,�"1 /Qr,, � -�d �-t�; ;' � � _ �. Y, ge. � -� __ - -� ;,,. �'_/ i� .� � � ,., . �rt_� ` , � , �,� r -. _ - _-,- .�- � � . , T-�' � � - "�r� �S �jF �t}-� '`f;; !�_i,-1�C-�-r-1F", '-•1F]_F 2� f{.�- I ' �,n '/� -i , :I• :r ' - �- —� --�- �:�- � 'r _Is . ,�'� -j , � 1 , i �ti / � i� , ✓,( � � \ ;�/"�/ .�'Vd�\�. �.t� ��. Q,y:�t� � ��pr:J�,', II n -..�',c., {�'`�y� � - --- ` _l, � f� , � ,r ��: � • j�� .� � r � l� ' t NS' rr At ' ��\,/ • `F � i _�2�c� 2ri' ( � • , iit�1�`I• � � �!�.i�7� �%` � � �� f`'�.�9� �: : ,�� i 2 .. '_" � � r� � i.� S, .� L�� ' .. � �'�� ' e . , .r � � � , '� • a �r _ k � - •c- --- `-`-r ;� �.., , 2 �t�o- ,. I 1 Page 2 ' , ' , � 10. New lighting has been added to brighten the road at night. 11. An extensive storm sewer will be provided to take care of existing drainage problems. 12. Improvements to the side connecting streets will b�-:part of the total project. 13. Connecting roads between Rivers Edge Way and the school ' entrance will be shifted an additional 5 feet to the East go give the abutting home owner more protection. , 14. The City of Fridley's original estimate for the preliminary assessment roll was $476,735.00, the total ' project cost was $939,161.00. This cost was figured without Federal assistance and with the following conditions the City would pay. , A. All work on the service roads. B. All right of way acquisition. C. One half the signal cost: , D. All drainage improvements. E. All lighting costs. Now we are assured of Federal assistance of fifty per � cent. This would cut our costs to less than $250,000.00, but with additional County participation and project modifications our dollar participation has been estimated , to be around $100,000.00, which is approximately 10 per cent of the project. The following items have been negotiated with the County: , ' , �l � A. AlI paving on side connecting roads will be charged to the County including Ashton Avenue extension. B. All right of way along East River Road main line including the home at Rivers Edge Way and the gas station acquisition at Mississippi Street will be paid by the County. C. The City will only participate it� one of the signals. D. The City will split the cost of the lighting improvement 50-SO with the Federal funds. � � �� , o _ .� � PROPOSED � SIGNAL � LOCATION . , 2 2 1 i �iA . A/ �. � � Q� PROPOSED � SIG�JAL O LOCATION (TEMP. SIG EXIST�NG� \ \ \ 1 _5. 7l -�'; � � . a R � ��ER ,� f � I � � (� , �. ` / � �' ' \ ' I 1 ^ _.��, � � ' °' . , \. , N •,,,,,,y .._� . _ , i �- _, ,� g ,.� ��r. _-__.. �1 ��\ � ' `'�_. i i ` }• i , 1 , \ 1\ � � !< i { i �" � , . l. �p �r 1.' • . � � , I . ` , ' ' . � � � � < ' . . _ \� � r , � i : . 1-J . .. _ '� iI J \ 1 . . � . . , � . �\ I) . , ` _ . ,' � �� . - _ - � *- � . � - �s�- . �e- o •� . � i A� .. � � , , ' �� .' � � � - � l e� r 1 w _,� � � � - �- , _� ' . . � 5 � I�`; ,-f-' :. ; _ � -- _ '� . : � _ , �. �� , I __�i�,_""',D'_ � � � _ �_ , . ' . ' �, '.J T � � r�, >'` � t.T �` � 1-- _ � � _ � � -.. - -- _ 13 ,g-_ - : �:�: , -� -_ . ��,�` - . _ . �f - I __ . "" ��,, ' 9 J <` � __ � _ -, o� � - -�_ � 1 _ _ ----- -- �—_ � -- ----- � � Z � . - = - �-�1 3 �— � . — -- �.j� � � ` [ �R/_VER_--. - - - _ - - . � _ �_�j _� - �` ` - -- —= , � - -- ` ��. - - — _ _ 7 � _ � '� ,� , � _ � � ��----� / _ —_�� L�.T. R7. � . . � ; , � .. , � � � �- � � ± ` � UGHTING. ' STORM � � , 4 � � IN MEDIAN - � SEWER ; � '� � _, _ _ . I , . i 11 '` '`s` �� -----� _— -' ! i _ �� ' v ,: -� 1 � ------------------ ------ -------- --- -_�.i__ ��.�=. �__�._� �'' N � NP RA/LW�'iYS , �l � LEGEND ORIGINAL PLAN -- REVISED PLAN ._ _ �—'---'+ 1�SED!AN L.T. �EF i Tl.'nN LA�vE R.T. R�G%� i TU=�tJ ��':G _ _ = SERV�CE ROAD 12 -, ■ ' ;' � . ;� :� .. � , 4 , ;. , : � � � • ' �� - „� y,, s .�c ` / , . ��Sn��Z�� . . ��E _ l � , - - ISS�PP� . . . , p,t � 5 5 . ,�' . � /' �, ,, _�^ . ' , i,� -�'` •r-� �i `s'- �^`� , _-i "} - � n �, , �F�� t� � L _�•-. �\ �✓• � � ^ a � � \ 'u� / / /� I \� � � \ �,_- \ � ' __�1j �` '; i � � \, i�'�3� �� 1. ' /�"�.: - 6 �, ; � E P � . ./l �, ----� ` `„ � \ �.` � � / , _. �� -- ' " . � I. '< i Iv �� .-`� '��•� ;fi- � �. , - �. ' s 1� � � ' \ � � �' \ � ,-, ,� � .�: ". r� D , � �, � , � , ;c � t i, �.4 � –''� . '�• . m �i nY � � s� ^ � ; � 'I �• ��Qr _, � . � . .. I� =" J n �- - �� , ��• . ' � r�'„ Y fi -r^ � � , \ � � � _ , _' ' --� I :'. i . . �� . !✓ � � ` � �J ` ' � � __ _ "' �, '. � , -, . l � - -_ " . ,. �_ .. '� ' ' ""s ��t' ��,�• �/ � __�""""' 1: - - �, 13 ` - - - . n - : ^ _ f -_ _� oQ o J_ � -- - � �- --_ -1-.__ ---� ; �,, D < w' ! N � � � 1 N i ��- - ' i{,, -,� � _-- -- . -"_-^ -- � -, r - _ Y. � �n � :� - i _�J ��' . _ - -� 1 �' . t� � '..� D � / � � ' ' Lw ' �r-�� . � �� 1 ~ 1. '! J � '"' � i 1 .T. �-T ,_ -_. i �_. -- '�S - : 'z . �j �_ - � !� T, R;C. ; _ : . ,� ..._=- _ �y . ' STORM � � , 'i ---�— —�— � ;I x , , _ ' e.rEWER f < � I � ; � N , � ` � � .��...� � ' y --- '___'-_-__ -... ..... �_'__ __'"'_'__'__.J OS ? 11 . �` __ _. _ - � — .�i i� "� —.�.��--� '��''' 1�'�' M r c r , � _�—_. ___J_i.--�-----�----`/ � '._..._...,.. r 1 �� - -------- ------- - - - 1' �.�� L.T. R.T. ' T,� � 12 �.;��►� � �FT Tl'��;J ! A`�°E � � ,. �, •,- �i'�. �T TU=�r�� L:, ._ SERVIC� KOA�J �--- --� . __ _ GN � ., .� r. � F� �i"'�.�:�. i>':r.� :r�'_'n,y !'=_.�::':�; i''::� ..;�.. .�'�.,�.iL'S-;.,.. .�.�:: .. . _a.'7'° J:� f_s' .._.�7;.�. �i:'h_�.,<,��",� �'.'..�.� ,., Y'c.. ��.�,_��_. .:� :.'!: Y�r..,. l.��:1. `��'. ri,'� L.._.?:,_.a.. :... _ .."_,`, .....�..`.r�°�! il. .� '�� . . ,1 ., .. ..'.: ,�� nfr,:=-yyi'': :,°�, ?.. . ,'° :s _ . . , i k . ,,. � t . - t _..., .�:-.. -; . ,. � � .. ._ _ , , . , _.. � , °• 7 � 'r �' " * "' i _ � ....� ..__ „>.. .i�'�'�_j...._. ;'�-� � . ti . = �...� � ;J1� n a ; s. .�s t y J:.. . _ �1...C.� � ..LL � .r� ��?v{. ....1.;. !iy F',;i�r' :» .i`�, �...�.....,... r. .. ,J:,.>, ...,......a .. . � , +� aJ.vi �� _'a — Y:�.. -i:I � � _ ,:t J a . . - � . *. M:.1 �1 '...i....y _S�S!. l,. X, �'��" �K� a.��.._..�. ..i� �..... ' ~l�'�a' ��'• tP�.�a�.. � . . ..� .'. . �u _', . . 2 f y - . . . .i �� .... ,�:;1 �. d... a. -� . �l."�1 a.. . ,.,. v <y .{,t)!,.. �`N -t - a �`. Sl�� r i1r.� �-._..�._'r?.:.._ . . .�.:j.t . . . o � .. . �,�:.�' �4 . -.� �:1 • ' �..:::: '�' � "" 1'� ° �":., " �> -�: y �� ;.s'-] .. t ....�� -,. . . .�a �, r' .. . d �:� ir c r.� �. ::�:!r _' ! 't._ , .._. _•.t . ^ j '/ w . '°,n., + - -.k. ' `y L:' , . _..... ..�i� � � .... _.r,.,. - .ti-- ._..iC.�' a:+t�.:._ . � • 9 - - ` . ` - ! o ,�, �. � r:.. : r., .'�.^i ° .,? � , _ :�.a' . _�.'� ... , _s , -_S �r .. !lh ,. �... ._ _ ..r.-. ., . � r . .. �i- s -... �:-...;� . . . . � .. .y t, r t:�� ..�..�'.r. .-1.7 �..S�.b y ? �:.�; . �.� . . . .., ....._ .��i ��.� , , a �. . .,.. . . �,..� _ , ..., ..._s..._..,.....-,. , . � ' [ R ji 7 , 'a.. .. .. . � . ... . - -.. � . .. � .. ___ _ � • � � I � I ' I , , � II � 1 ' � \ `r � �:.1/ � �V �� 3 ° / � � . � � I� , � Date: 26 January 1971 To: Parents of Gardena Students k`rom: PTA Safety Committee Issue: Sidewalk(s) for Gardena Avenue SIDEWALK S ONE SIDE aR BOTH OR NEITHER? WHAT IS BEST FOR OUR CHILDREN??? � �� ,�R �o� \ 0' _ . a l.K�� _ � � p��C SUMMARY OF WORK DONE TO DATE: � � � \,�j In past years, many residents were againsic sidewalks due to assessments. � \ ow, Gardena Avenue is a state aid road--therefore, NO COST to the land owner other than i:.creased property.value of , . approximately �5-�15 per year. . Street to be improved begin.ning May, 1971. Logical. time to put sidewalks in. , . Cit En ineer rec�m�ends 8' boulevard between curbing and sidewalk so there is Y g adequate space for safety� ar.d snow s�orage. ' , Rssults of recent survey show: 106 in favor, 21 Agair.st, 1 no comment. . Results of survey of Gardena n: =r.�-:? re� ��'�nts sho�,�: 8 in favor, 11 against, 2 ' no resronse. ' . See article in Frid? ��,� Sun Fe`�ruary 3. � . Attend City Council Hearin� reb:uary 8 City Hall• � � ., i 1 ' � , ' � � ' 1'�EbdO �CO: Marvin Brunsell MEMO FROM: Hank Muhich MEMO DATE: January 28, 1971 RE: Balthazar Property Progress Report Four Inspections & �ao Phone Calls On January 21, 1971 at 1:30 P.M, checked both units on grade floor for occupancy. Both apparently occupied as barking dog responded to ringing of door bell in each unit. Checked rear entry of previously occupied basement apartment. No response. Location of portable milk cooler against storm door was evidence of no recent use of entry, and possibly no occupancy of lower unit. - On January 21, 1971 at 4:15 P.M, checked all three units again for possible return of at least one of the occupants. Again no respo�se. Additional evidence of vacating of one unit was the presence of only two of the previous three N.S.P, electric meters. Apparently one recently removed. On January 22, 1971 at 10:00 A.M. there was no response again. On January 23, 1971 at 8:10 A.M, called the Balthazar residence (788- '. 7241) and there was no answer. Checked reverse directory for any additional numbers. Found Radloff number to be 788-0183 and called this number. No answer. Dialed Balthazar number again. Operator informed me that the phone had been disconnected and referred me to a different number to comtact (781-7979). This turned out to be the daughte'r. She informed me that parents had complied to the agreement and were now in Florida. On January 25,, at any of the units. HM/cc 1971 at 3:00 P.M, checked all 3 units again. No answer /� �J � �r! i� //Jt / �..J./� � ti L� I ! AANK MUHICH �hief Building Inspector �; ' �� I ' �_ 1 , i i , MAILED:; CERTIFIED MAIL May 14, 1970 6 1� I �' �i� . G.. orgc Baltha�or � 1374 Hiohcaay 1Q0 :1. E. ;' iridley, iiinn�sota. • � ! i llear rir. Balthazor, ; i On Septecaber 2, 1RG9, the City Couneil �ranted an occupancy perc►it to i' T�1-r. �nd :�irs. George Balthazor on1y, 1374 Hi�ht•Jay ;r100 (I.oC 3, Sub@ivision �IO, � ��i�ditor's Subdivision s�94) fcr the loF;er level third facaily dwelliczg, oniy at this address, with the perr�it to espire December 31, 197� or sonner if rir. `, 3altha�or disposes of his property, wfth permit non-rene�ah2e. ,-�;- , ; � The Ci.Cy Council ia session Monday,T;tiay Il., I970, reaffirmed the actiort �' i:Gi.�n at the meetinU Qf S�=ptember 2, 147Q nnd dire�ted that rir. and rirs. � I�<:? *hazor be natified in cariti.nb tha� the SpeciAl Oe�upancy Perr�it �zautd nat i be r-nec�:ed and that the ttiird family would b� m�ved fram the dwelling by i , December 31, 1970. ; In viezo of the a'��ve, you are advised that y�ur occupancy perr�ik issued ' September 2, i 69 will ex, ire Decembor 31, 1974 and c,ili- not be renecaed. ycu are fu;.ther advised that on uF before Decembcr 3I, 2970, the double bt�n�alo,� ; located on Lot 3, Subdivision Plo. I0, Auditor's Subdivisian ;�94X �ddressed as I374 Highc;ay 100,N.�., rridley, tiinneso�a, m.ay be used to house only two i,�' fa�i.Zies and tl�at the Chird family shall be r�oved �rom the premises on or befare December 3#, 2970. HItA/m2s � CC: Councilman Sheridan Engineering Dept. �i' Yours very t�uZy, iiomer P.. �1��krum Cfty M�1nager ■ , ' REGUL�R COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 19, 19f 9 ' i,,� � ` :,� �"`� � ` ± �L� a� PAG$- � � �(� �� f ��% /, - (�/// , • ✓! i_//, �; j., / t' Councilman Har ' - ris said that there were notices sent. Zf the land owner did �'� ' not want to attend the Hearing, this is his business. Mr. Gibbs pointed out that there were condemnations in this area also, so everyone should be well aware of all the pr�ceedings. In the City of Frfdley an assessment search ' can be obtained for a minimal cost which would show all the assessments, plus all the pendinq.assessments. ' IJ , MOTION by Councilman Harris to deny the request for an abatement of special assessments on Lot 13, except the east 200' and except the north 30' for road, Auditor's Subdivision #89 requested by Kutzik and Leavitt. Seconded by Council- man Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried. CONSIDERATION OF A RE EST FOR THREE FAMILY OCCUPANCY IN DOUBLE BUNGAIAW IN R-1 ZONING: (George Balthazor, 1374 Highway 100 N.E.) The Assi.stant City Attorney explained that at one time Mr. Balthazor came in and applied.for a special use permit to allow for a two family dwellinq. Since ' that time, the Building Inspectior, Department discovered three electrical services goinq into the house and reported it. It was checked out and found that there were three families residing there, and a summons was.issued. He ��\� said that it was his position that the Council could not le all under R-1 zoning under the present Ordinance. g y grant anythinq ` Mr. Balthazor said that this is a double lot, so there is plenty of room. He caid that there were two fatailies in the other section, no children. Council- man Liebl asked how this was first brought to his attention. Mr. Gibbs re- plied that he believed it was first reported to the Buildinq Inspection ' Department be a neighbor, whereupon, the Inspector went out to check. Mr. Balthazor said that they have lived there 18 years, and have had no complaints from neighbors that he knew of. ' ' ' ' , Mayor Kirkham advised Mr, Balthazor that the legal department for the City has informed the Council that there is nothinq legally they could do under the Statutes, He said that Mr. Balthazor's only recourse would be to apply for a ' rezoning, but he did not want to give him the impression that he would encouraqe � it, and he did not feel, personally, that it would qo through. � CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF FIrIAL PLAT (P.S. #69-04) EAST RANCH ESTATES FIRST ADDITION, ROBERT A. SCi�20ER: (Generally located north of Osborne Road nnd west of University Avenue): MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the final p1at, Eaet Ranch Estates First Addition requested by Robert A. Schroer. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a roli call vote,•Kirkham, Liebl, Harris, Samuelsan votinq aye, Mayor Kirkham de- clared the motion carried. CONSIDERATION Or^ APPF,OVAL OF FJ[i??lL PI,.'�T (P.S, �(,g-p5) E1,ST Rfi`:^FJ ESTATL , ADDZ'1 ZON� ROgE�?T A . SCHRU' :.:: !- ----- - , -- �--- ___ _ __ _.�_ S SECOh'A (Gener�ll} lcc�l�e6 north oi O:;riOr71P Ro_zd and west of University Avenue) � ' C�ouncilman Httrris ashed if there had been a petition received for the itaprove- II%ent of 79th Avenue. He wae told that.there had not been. Gouncilman Liebl said thAt hs Nould like to aee �ome s�rt of internal traftic system sat before a�pzuval o! the final plat Ea�� p'�Ce� �QCO�d Ad��t�pn. He said that he , , 11 ��r ��~ � �° �� ' ' ' , REGULAR COUNCIL MEET'Zh3G flF' SEPTEMBER 2, 1969 PAGE 8 The City Engineer sugqested that the,resolution be passed before the appli- cation be made, as he felt that it would carry more weight if the improvement is already ordered in. Councilman Liebl said that eoncerning Main Street, the industry on the west side has no objections to the improvement, but the residents on the east side have been vigorously objecting. He said that he felt that the parking problems should be solved befoYe the street improvement qoes in. Councilman Harris said that he felt that if the improvement is already ordered ' in, the City could qo before the County and speak in stronge.r terms. Council- man Liebl said that he did not want parking on the street. Councilman Harris replied that if Main $treet is taken over as a county road, they will place ' certain restrictions on the street. Mayor Kirkham wondered if the apartment house owners should not be approached on their parking probl�ms as he felt that it w�uld be a shame to wait another year.. Councilman Samuelson pointed � out that the City does have a Tagging Ordinance for tagging parked cars, and if enforced along Main Street, with renters getting tickets, they will bring pressure on the apartment house owners. ' ' MOTION by Councilman Harris to table this resolution to the Regular Council Meeting of September 15, 1969. Seconded by Councilman Samuelson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVING REMAINDER OF PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 6, 1969: � 1. REZONING REQUEST BY GEORGE BALTHAZOR, ZOA #69-10• Lot 3, Subdivision �k10, Auditor's Subdivision #94. Rezone from R-1 to R-3A. ' ��) �� Councilman Sheridan reported that he had spoken to Mr. and Mrs. Balthazor and the Council concerning this request and, speaking for himself, he felt that the rezoning request should be denied. However, if the Council concurs, he would suggest a solution for Mr. Balthazor. Mr. Balthazor is partially retired now, and will be fully retired December, 1970. With full retirement, he could receive a better tax break for disposing of his property. In the meantime, he suggested granting an occupancy permit for the lower level to run through December 31, 1970. Mayor Kirkham and Councilman Samuelson concurred with this suggestion. MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to deny the rezoning request by Mr. George ' Balthazor. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously. ' MOTION by Councilman Sheridan to grant an occupancy permit to Mr. & Mrs. George Balthazor only, 1374 Highway #100, for the lower level third family dwelling, only at this address, with the permit to expire December 31, 1970 or sooner if he disposes of his property, with the permit non-renewable. The � motion was seConded and upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham de- clared the motion carried unanimously. ' , 2. REZONIh*G RE�UEST BY R.W. Y90RMSBF.�KER, ZOA #69-08: NW Quarter of NW Quarter except N. 16.6 acres and SW Quarter of NW Quarter of Section 2; also the N. 34.68 acres of NE Quarter of NE Quarter of Section 3. Rezone from M-2 to R-3. 0 1`' � I� STATE 4F at I N��ESaTA t. COflPiTY OF ANOKA • �IUTUAL AGREE�iENT � TH IS MUTtIA L AGREE�1EtdT mad� and entered i nto th i s I Oth day of September, 1969, by and be�w�on ThQ City of Fridlay, , a Mutt ic ipa t corporat i on c�nd htr. Gear e Ba th o . 9 I az r. , ' ' WHEREAS, G�orfla B�Ith3zor is the owner oi= Lot Three (3), Subdivl8�o� Tcrt (10), Audi�or's Subdivtsion Ninety-four (94); and WHEREAS, Georgo $�tthazor roqueets a tem;�orc�ry �ezonin� fr�r�� R-I to R-3A; �r�d WI4EREAS, tha to�r�ornry rezoninfl has bcen denled by the ' City Cou�cii o� thQ City of Fridiey; and � � �� fHEREAS, Gaot+c�t� Batthazor de�ire� to 1 ivo in tho lowcr 1 ov� 1' of tl�at cert� i � bu i 1 d i n� 1 oc�►te�d on Lot Throc (3 ), 5ubd i v i� i o� ?an (10), Auditor's Subdivision �linoty-four (94); c��d WMER�AS, occup�ncy of tho towe� lev�l by George Baithasor � wl i l cs�n;ti�u�a a violation of tho zonir�� ordin�nc�• ond ' � ' WHCREAS, tho C i ty i s ngreer�b l e to o I I o�� b�r. and �f�s. Ei�itha�or �o r�Bide in tho lo�cr unit on � tem�orory ba�is until Deaember 31, J9;0; and �l9NEREAS, occup��tion of thc lowcr lovo{ will bo only by � t�;r. cnd Rtr,:a. 6�� Itz:��op; .:..;:� ' �� . I � • � WNERCAS, �lr. and Mrsf George 8althazor shmll be the only parties allowed to live in the lower unit. NOti� T�IEREFORE BE {7 RtSOLYED, that the City of Fridley ogrees to allo� kt�. and Mrs. Geor9e Bol#:haxor to occupy tha lower levol of that cartain building locatad en Lot Three (3), Subdivision T�n (i0), Auditor's 5ubdivision Ninety-four (94), and the �a id t�tr. and htrs. Geor�e 6a Ithazor e�rae tF�at such occupaney sheli be ceased by tilidni�ht, DQCaMb�r 31, IQ%0; an� th�t the occupancy Nilf not be renewed and ia not t�ansferable. ,; in Prasence OF �/. �,' , :�.: � f ��I/ , , �: / ' ; ��' �--- `�. �--�--_ 1� . � - -. i' �' � '' i ! ;, � r'j ,�,i .i-�� /� .-��7�� i" % � - / / - / l „t.., .% � � � / �. C • Y iir. George Balth�yor I368 �ii�;��ay �10� N'o�iea�t Fridley, �iinn�:sota 55 �21 De�r ; i� a 0 � S�ptemm�r 3.1, 1967 4r� Au�t 3, 1�u4, t'ne City Coune�.3 a�prov��l a Spec�.al Use F��nit �Go �S�rmit conat?-u��ion o� a da€zbl� i�unga3+rx,� in an R-1 �iv�ie� on Lo� 3, Subuivisi�z of Lo� I,4, �'��xc'�3.fo�'s Su'�diviaiou %�o. S4, :�a;� b�3.ng 1374 i3i}i�c,�ay �100 AiQ�:t��a�t. This Special U�o ��r:,-�.t �ra� for ttae Purp�se o� all.c7ww�.ng a dou'�].e bu�-:��lc:w to %e Cc:�sfixuc��d in an ]�-1, t�r on�-�amily re�i- c�Lnt�a]., cl�.,,tric� o� arc�a. �ho �peaia2 ��e �rzn:�t �;oo� nofi eQn- t.ain a p�ov� sion ti�at ��rmits r�c>re tha� t�;,ro fa�i13.�� to occuPY t�x�,s r�x;�I�in;� unifi. Ya�.t ar� hc��iy xio�iii�d that under no cir- eu�-�:�t�.n�� iai�.l yau �ra�.#.t mo�� tlaan tcJ� fa.�i3ies to o�cuby th� prv :�3.sea �t �374 F3i�IIi3�V �1f3Q �tcar��ast i� tha C3t� o� Fri�?leY. oz yc�wr s��cial t��e ��,�it w31I ?� �w�j�cr to r�vac�tion. � � V�ry trul.y yours, 1��Jg�s ecs CQUx��.l�� rh�ri�a.� Ci.ty �1�t��: :�Y City �;�-;� ir.� �r Buil.�ir� Zn�;;-ec'coz Marvin C. �runseli �C1II�� CI`� 1`��.�:��.G�.R 2� _ _ 1 � 1 � , � ' � , � 1'�� MINUTES OF REGULAR PARKS AND RECREATION COl�A4ISSI0N MEETING DECEMBER 28, 1970. Meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Chairman Fi.tz�atrick. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fitzpatrick, Blair, Olson. MEMBERS ABSENT: Ash, Novitsky. OTHERS PRESENT: Paul Brown, Director of Parks and Recreation. Ralph Volkman, Park Foreman. Cathie Stordahl, Secretary to Commission. EQUIPMENT � EMPLOYEE USE POLICY Mr. Blair pointed out to the Commission that the City Employee F� Equipment Use Policy as stated, does not show the acceptance or rejection of the activity or event by the Parks �, Recreation Commission. He felt that the Commission should be consulted on an activity regarding the Parks and Recreation Department before a final decision was made. Mr. Fitzpatrick agreed with Mr. Blair and pointed out the two areas where the Commission should have been included. Item #3A. "The Parks and Recreation Director is to kee the City Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission informed of all Tournaments and s ecial events to be held on ark ro ert ." Item #4A. "Re uest for use of Cit Employees and equipment should be made in writing three 3) weeks in advance of event to the City Manager and the Parks and Recreation Commission " MOTIUN by B.ea,uc, Secanded a�5 amen e u� o Pnh ,c .► HOCKEY ASSOCIATION OF FRIDLEY. O.�san, �a ap�nave �the ech.e.a-t,c�n Comm.i,s�stion. e Ma�c.an S �qu.i.pmev�t Ue e � The Commission received copies of the 1970 - 1971 Hockey Schedules and Mr. Blair asked the Commission and Mr. Brown if something could be done about the starting date. The Board of Directors for the Hockey Association set up the schedules to begin on ' Saturday, January 2, 1971, and the boys haven't had a chance to practice. W�th New Year's weekend, many of them would be out of town. Mr. Fitzpatrick said he didn't feel that the Commission should take any action � because it should be handled by the Association itself. After some discussion, Mr. Brown agreed to confer with the President of the Hockey , Association, Mr. Bob Kelly, to see if they could eliminate the first round of games and make them up at the end of the season. Mr. Blair agreed with this solution to the problem. � � � � i PARK GARAGE BREAK-INS. Mr. Ralph Volkman, Park Foreman, was present to give the Commission a full report on the break-ins at the Park Garage over the past two years. Mr. Volkman reported that since the Park Garage was moved to its present location in Locke, they have had four (4) break-ins, amounting to over $2,000.00, the most recent being December 20, 1970, when $604.00 worth of tools and equipment was stolen. Mr. Volkman has prepared a report for the City Council and City Manager, with copies going to the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Director of the Department. In this report, he details each break-in and encloses a copy of the Police Aeport. Mr. Volkman is.asking the City Council to do something about this problem. He sugAests a silent alarm system. This system would involve taping the windows and bugging the doors of the garage, so that the minute they are tampered with, an alarm would sound, unbeknownst to the intruder, in the PoliCe Station. The Company Mr. Volkman conferred t � ' � ' ' � � � 1 WJ r Parks and Recreation Commissiori Minutes, December 28, 1970. Pa e 2 PARK GARAGE BREAK-INS (con't): with is Security Alarm Systems, and their system will cost $127.00 for installation and $15.00 monthly for rental. We could not purchase the system, only rent it. He offers this as one solution and asks both the City Council and the Commission for any others they might have. The Commission discussed this problem and agreed with Mr. Volkman, that something had to be done. Mr. Brown informed the Commission that the Department can not afford to replace these tools and equipment until the fear of theft is removed or the situation corrected. Mr. Volkman said that the Park Department men are presently driving to the City Garage to borrow tools, if they have those needed, and the men have been clocking themselves, to report the amount of time lost in travel. He said they are presently working an average of 4'� hours of an eight hour day, due to the loss of time in travel. MO7ION b U.P�san Sec�nded .a �.tem e tiws e po�b.c e,e a wcq u, SALE OF PARK PROPERTY. B�a,i1r. �a necammend �ta �h.e — e cvc Nca4 e , .ca n cah�c,ced. Caunc.,i.Q, �hu,t a bcucg,Q.cvc ,-ta he,ep ca o Z e ,The City Assessor was asked to research the backround of the Cheri Lane Property and the Horizon Heights Property, located at 53rd � Lincoln. The Cheri Lane Property was donated by Target Stores, Inc., for park purposes and cannot be sold. � The Horizon Heights property, located in Innsbruck, was purchased for a Tot-Lot and it would be expensive for the City to develop, due to the facilities needed, such as a storm sewer and sanitary sewer easement and construction. � Mr. Fitzpatrick directed Mr. Brown to place these three properties on the agenda for the January 25, 1971, meeting: #1. Cheri Lane Property. #2. 53rd and Horizon Heights Property. #3. Flanery Park. jFLANERY ESTATE. � Mr. Brown informed the Commission that he was having a problem getting together with the people in charge of the Flanery Estate. He said that he had communicated with these peop�e and it was his understanding that they were going to endorse the check and then give it to the City. This has been some time ago, and he's heard nothing more 1 about it. Mr. Brown suggested that this be placed in the hands of the City Attorney, for further action. ' MOTIUN b�.i.tz a�r,i,cFz, Seconded b B.P.a,itc, �a e C,c.t ahne , oh ul�t e!c cte,tc,an. 2 � -the F.P�ctne�cy �•s�a,te �.n .th.e handb o e , YOUTH ADVISORY. Mr. Fitzpatrick requested that the Youth Advisory be placed on the agenda for the January, 1971, meeting. 1 1971 BUDGET. � Mr. Brown told the Commission t}��X j�� had been checking over the finalized 1971 Budget and he had some suggested solutions for solving the problems of shortage of funds for overtime, ��. Parks and Recreation Commission, December 28, 1970 Page 3 BUUGET (con't): Mr. Brown said that the Cormnission hacl asl.ed for $li�,UUU.00 for an irrigation system for The Commons Park. The City Council only approved $6,300.00. The second item which was cut was the Park Department �vertime. We asked for $10,000.00 and the City Council approved only $S,ODU.00. Mr. �'olkman, the Park Foreman, and Mr. Brown reviewed the items listed under "Other Improvements" for the l�epartment and made suggestions to the Commission for changes, with the hope'of raising $3,000.00 to transfer into the Overtime category. The suggested changes are shown in detail on Page 4 of the Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes for December 28, 1970. (Note: See The Addendum). MUTIUN b B.�.a,ch., Seeanded 6 0.?�an, zo a nave �h.e 1971 Bud 2i �r.an.e e1c w�.th,i.n ,th,e � 9� �'�, � nee�mm2n e y� e Pwc, an Reelr.eaZc.an ep ev�,i T e a-t,c.an nnhh n — NAMING OF PARKS. Mr. Brown suggested the naming of three park lands. The first one being the tract of land northwest of Rice Creek School, legal description, L A Registered Land Survey #3 and Parcel 620, Revised Auditor's Subdivision #10. The Park to be called Rice Creek Park. The second tract of land to be named is Outlot 1 off of Pearson's Craigway Estates, Second Addition. The Park is to be called Riverview Heights Park. The third tract of land to be names is located in Rice Creek Plaza, North Addition, Outlot 1, and will be called Plaza Park. MUTIUN b B.Q,a.tn, Seeanded 6 0-?�s�n, �a a�nave xhe e�-9 pan , an p za ate. . e a�'.c.an eah�u.e ADJOURNMENT. 1z � �� R�.ee Cneeh. PcvcFz Ri.ve�cv�.ew MOTI�N by B.�a,itc, Seconde,d by U.P�an, .to adfacvcn �h.e mee,ti.ng cLi 10:10 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held on Monday, January 25, 1971, at 7:30 p.m. in the conference room at Civic Center. Respectfully submitted, CA HIE STORDAHL, Secretary to Commission , , �J LJ � ' ' I � ' Addendum to Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes, December 28, 1970. Pa e 4 1971 BUDGET TRANSFER PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARK DEPARTMENT: PERSONAL SERVICES 475.11 Overtime CAPITOL OUTLAY 475.54 Other Improvements Other Improvements Detail: Spring Brook Park Logan Park Madsen Park Summit Square Park Sylvan Hills Park Oak Hill Park Craig Park Altura Park REQUESTED 10,000.00 125,260.00 APPROVED 5,000.00 �8,175.00 Delete - 1,000.00 - 200.00 - 200.00 - 325.00 - 1,040.00 - 100.00 - 100.00 - 100.00 - 3,065.00 REVISED + or - 8,065.00 + 3,065.00 25,110.00 - 3,065.00 New Total 900.00 � 1,200.00 -0- 100.00 360.00 200.00 300.00 600.00 The above deletions include Apparatus Equipment, Park Benches, and Picnic Tables, at each of the mentioned Park areas. Budget Transfer Explanation• � The Parks and Recreation Commission request a transfer of funds within their 1971 Budget as detailed above: Overtime spent $6,912.28 in 1969 and estimated costs in 1970 will succeed $7,900.00. The Commission feels additional funds must be met in order to maintain our parks, especially in the Winter with ice rinks, etc. By transferring the $3,065.00 from Other Improvements, to our Overtime Fund, this will give our Department the opportunity to continue our services to the citizens of Fridley. This transfer of funds does not affect the overall total of our complete 1971 Budget as approved by the City Council. 12/70 �, ._.. � ' � ' ' ' � i � 0 BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL MEETING OF JANUARY 19 1971 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Zeglen at 8:10 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Zeglen, Tonco, Gnerre, Lindblad MEMBERS ABSENT: White OTHERS PRESENT: Hank Muhich - Chief Building Inspector MOTION by Zeglen to dispense with the reading of the minutes of the December 17, 1970 meeting. Seconded by Gnerre. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. • 1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A BUILDING FOR A SAVINGS & LOAN LOCATED ON PART OF LOT S, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO 153, THE SAME BEING 5203 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA (REQUEST BY TWIN CITY FEDERAL TO BE REPRESENTED BY BAKER ASSOC. INC. ARCHITECTS 220 CARGILL BUILDING MINNEA POLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 ) Mr. Brian Morgan was present to present the request. Mr. Morgan stated that the building will be 70 foot square. The exterior � of the building will be face brick which looks much like handmade brick. There will be an east and west entrance with decorative columns in front of them. The building will have a basement and main floor. There will , be offices on the south side of the lobby and the teller windows on the north side. The drive-up window will also be on the north side. In the center of the lobby there will be a fireplace. ' � � The basement level will be poured coacrete walls. In the basement there will be a community room with a storage room and a kitchenette. There will also be an employee's lounge plus a women�s lounge and locker room. Mr. Morgan was informed by the Board that a minimum 10' radius is required on all concrete curbing around islands and entries instead of the 6' radius shown on the plans. It was also stated that the parking stalls must be 10' x 20' according to code. The parking lot for the building will have two driveways. There was some ' discussion as to whether the weat driveway was setback eaough from Central Avenue. It was determined that there was 62' from the driveway to the property line. It could not be determined, however, how far the property ' line was from Central Aveaue. The Board asked that the Engineering Department check on the distance. , � MOTION by Gnerre to reco�end approval of a building permit subject to everything marked in red on the plans including the following�stipulations: 1. A minimum 10' radius be provided on all concrete curbing around islands and entries. 2. All parking spaces must be 10' x 20' except the 5 private spaces on the north side of the building. �. � , C ' Buil��rxg Standards-Design Control Meeting of January 19, 1971 Page 2 3. There must be concrete curbing around all blacktop areas. Seconded by Tonco. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried , unanimously. I 2. � � , �� I � CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT ADDITIONAL GARAGES FOR AN APARTMEN COMPLEX IN LIEU OF PARKING LOCATED ON LOTS 1 2 3 4 5 AND 6 BLOCK 2 PEARSON`S 1ST ADDITION AND PARCEL 8400, S OF SECTION 3, T 30, R 24, ANOKA COUNTY. MINNESOTA, Ti� SAME BEING 7805, 7825, 7845, 7855, 7875, AND 7895 EAST RIVER RQAD. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA (REQUEST BY FIVE SANDS DEVELOPMENT, 14Uti CENTRAL AVENUE, MINNEApOLIS, MINNESOTA,) Mr. Ken Nordling and Mr. Dick Fudali were present to present the request. Mr. Nordling stated that they would like to convert the outside parking along 79th Way N.E. into garages. They would be putting in either two 16 stall garages or a 24 stall garage and an 8 stall garage depending on where the sewer line would come in. These additional garages will conform ta the garages all ready built and the rest of the apartment complex. MOTION by Tonco to recommend approval of the request for additional garages as shown on the drawings and specifications. Seconded by Lindblad, unanimously. ADJOURNI�NT ; Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried ' The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Zeglen at 9:20 P.M. Respectfully submitted, , /_�� ,..L . L,1! � � ' CAROL CHUDEK Secretary , , ' ' � �� , LJ � � � , ' +� G; PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 20, 1971 8:00 P.M. PAGE The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Fitzpatrick at $:00 P.M. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Fitzpatrick, Schmedeke, Zeglen Members Absent: Erickson, Minish Others Present: Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant APPROVE PLANNING COIKMIISSION MINUTES: DECEMBER 9 1970 1NC)TION by Zeqlen, seconded b� Schmedeke, that the Planning Convnission Minvtes of December 9, I970 be approved. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. RE CEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: DECEMBER 15 1970 � 1MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planninq Commission receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals meeting of December Z5, Z970. Upon a voice vote, a11 votinq aye, the motion carried unanimously. itECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES: DECEMBER 17 1970 1• PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING REQUEST• ZOA ��70-07, RICHLAND, INC BY R C ERNST. To rezone from R-1 to R-2 (two family dwellings) the South 395 feet of Lot 1, Lots 2 and 3, Lot 4, except that part of the West 132 feet lying South of the North 328.9 feet, Lots 5 and 6 except the South 230 feet thereof, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22. The public hearing notice was read by Vice Chairman Fitzpatrick. The Engineering Assistant read from the Zoning Ordinance Adopted November 3, 1969 the "Uses Permitted" under R-2 Districts (Section 45.06, 1-A) as follaws: 1) ltao family dwellings, 2) One family dwellings, 3)ARriculture, including farm, truck gardens and orchards, but excluding animal and poultry raiaing, 4( Churches, parish houses and convents, 5) Tawnhouses, under the conditions stated in the townhouse development Section 45.14." He s�ed it up by sa�ing R-2 does not include any larger unit than two family dwellings. Mr. Ernst was given the floor to explain his project. The maps were dis- pla�ted so that the audience could observe them. Lot 1 was in the original plan, but the owner has, since then, asked to be excluded at this time. The other exclusions were along Rice Creek Road where homes are now located. The total area of the request is approximately 32 acres. The intent is to subdivide the property into single family and tw� family uses. The main internal street will line up with Anoka Street at Mississippi Street and continue to Rice Creek Road. One cul de sac will be South of Mississippi running East, the next one will be North of Rice Creek Road with a single cul de sac to the West and a double cul de sac to the East which takes care of a larger area. The intent is to excavate a large pQ�� or lake using material trom the excavation to fill ��. � Plann��; Y_"om3,i�ssion Me. +,.�in�; - Januarv Lv�1971 _ PaQe 2 � -._-_.___.__ the surrounding lowlands and fill for the area to the North abutting Mississippi Street which they propose to dedicate to the City for a City Park. They feel there is a need for this type of housing -- single family mixed with two family dwellings in a price bracket which will ultimately allow the people to own their own homes. They did not have, at this time, a breakdown as to the number of double bungalows, two family and single family units they will constri•�t. They intend to offer lots for sale with the buyer having the option of having his own contractor or use the contractor for the project. Regarding the ponding, a small lake would be constructed provided with an overflow with a control structure at the outlet of the lake. In this way, the water level would be maintained the year around. From the control structure, the water would follow a West drainage ditch through the property out on Old Central Avenue to Moore Lake. They felt that this is an inexpensive solution to the storm sewer problem to the area and one which benefits everyone by main- taining a water reserve in the area and would have an aesthetic appeal to the neighborhood. Roy De Mars, 1442 Mississippi: He said that eight years ago there was talk of draining the same area, and in the same way as suggested this evening. He asked where is the water from Moore Lake going? When you raise the water level too high in Moore Lake, it will overflow the highway. They wanted us to pay for a storm drain going across into Moore Lake where all that water builds up and Moore Lake has not gotten an adequate drainage system to take care of the overflow water. He understood that there is an overflow pipe from the Lake to Rice Creek and that it is too small to take care of the storm water now. Mr. Ernst answered that he had been advised otherwise; that Moore Lake overflow has the capacity to handle the storm sewer problem from this area. They felt creating a large retention basin such as the one shown in their plans would retain the water and then allow it to go into Moore Lake. In answer to the questions raised regarding the development, he listed them. 1) Apartments: This was answered at the start of the hearing. They did not intend to develop apartments in this area. 2) Cost of storm sewer: He did not have the answer what the storm sewer would cost to run into Rice Creek, but he understood several hundred thousand dollars. What they are pro- posing to use would cost considerably less. 3) Traffic: R.ice Creek Road is a major thoroughfare road on the South and Mississippi Street on the North will be more than adequate to handle the traffic generated from the area. This area would contribute an insignificant amount of traffic. 4) Design of Buildings: He understood there was some concern that identical types of buildings would be built which would depreciate the area. He believed his prior statement of having lots for sale to buyers where they could contract with their own con- tractors or have them build using their plans or the plans of Richland, Inc. would protect the neighborhood. 5) Low cost: By obtaining R-2, they felt this would provide the opportunity of building two family dwellings which could eliminate low cost housing occurring. 6) Ecology in the area: They have gone a long way to keep the wildlife in the area. The neighborhood has appreciated the natural beauty of the area and have enjoyed this to the cost of the property owners. 7) School children: He could not predict the number of school children that this area would develop and did not believe anyone else could. Based upon a survey that the City of Fridley made about a year ago, J ' L__J , �_ � ' ,� � P l�r..n�n� ��oamrn�t ;, �.,n M�e � �i�� - T,nuary :`;� , ly?1 Pa�e 3 he would expect there would be fewer children from a development such as the one they are proposing which contains 74 lots rezoned R°2 against 105 lots if zoned R-1. Robert W. Erickson, 565 57th Avenue: He asked for more information about the natural drainage sys�em. The Engineering Assistant explained that a retention pond would be developed with an open ditch to Central Avenue and it would have to cross property other than that of the project. The property owners would be contacted, and the City would have to negotiate with them offering what they consider a fair price. If this is unsuccessful, the City could go to condemnation, the court appoints three appraisers. Both the City and the property owners can appeal the outcome of the court's decision. Mr. Erickson asked if there were sufficient water supply in existance or would the major supply have to be increased to take care of the needs of the area. And how about the sewer? ' The Engineering Assistant answered that the system is adequate. Sewer and water were designed to take care of this area for R-1 dwellings and the number of family units would be about the same for this project. Mr. Erickson asked ' if the valuation of the property would change with rezoning. Darrel Clark sa�d that taxes are basically set on valuation and whether or not the land is homesteaded, but he could not really answer questions on real estate taxes. . Mr. Erickson said the whole area is R-1 with single family residences, and there is no need to rezone t�e property. David A. Weiland, 1450 64th Avenue: He wished to present a petition against the rezoning request. He stated the people contacted were told duplexes were going in and not apartments. The original petition was presented with the assurance given Mr. Weiland that Council would also see the petitions. MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Zeqlen, that the PZanning Commission receive the peti tion presented by David A. Weiland, 1450 64th Avenue, petition- ing against the rezoninq request, ZOA #70-07, Richland, Inc. by R. C. Ernst. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Weiland then asked permission to read the heading of the petition which listed the reasons to disallow the present and all future rezoning of subject area. He said that 169 residents signed the petition, and 98Y of these were property owners. He then d�scussed the items separately. 1) Ecology: Talking about revenue and ecology, ecology loses. Mr. Jerald Tjader approached the Ir!etro- politan Council. They showed interest in the area and are sending out an ecologist to see if this area has value for a reservation for wildlife. There are ten families who are definitely interested in the ecology. 2) Environment: They referred to duplex areas in Hilltop. They are run down. For every pro, he would give a con. 3) The school is not overcrowded now. 4) Future property value: He cited 64th Avenue as an example of a street which was upgraded at a rapid pace after the people had a street put in, got FHA loans and put up garages. 5) Additional assessments in the form of increased capacity sewers, water and streets, at the cos� o� exist�ng property awners. The City Engineer told him �if the job is done right, ansunderground sewer is the only answer, anything else is an eyesore and an attractive nuisance to kids. The cost of r- � �lanning Commission Meet��- ,T��;�vY-�>_ ;�;�� ?�� Pat�e 4 the sewer the City Engineer was t?lking about was approximately one million dollars. The Federal Government turned down this project twice. If this storm sewer put in, other property owners would be assessed $10.00 for every 100 square feet. The average piece of property is 75' x 135'. 6) Zoning System: Mr. Weiland had prepared a City map showing the R-2 areas colored green and the R-3 colored yellow. He felt the rezoning request was arbitrary and not to the best interests of the people. Mr. Robert Erickson felt it should not be necessary to rezone a residential area when there is ample acrea�e in the northern part of the City, and there- fore, this request should not be considered. He could not express an opinion great enough and strong enough that he did not want any rezoning. Mr. Ernst should try the area to the North and develop a new area where there are no problems such as this area has. Mr. Roy De Mars:They do not have sidewalks and gutters and that would cost all of them more than $2,000 per family because they have 125 foot front property. What they are trying to do is force the property owners down to smaller pieces of property because a lot of them cannot pay those taxes. If you approve the request, you are going to have to put the sidewalks down the streets, you cannot get away from it. He would guarantee this could not be done for less than $2,000 because they have an acre of ground. If a street were put between 64th and 65th, they could sell the back half of their acreage. Mr. Harold Thielen, 6515 Fridley Street: The water comes down Fridley and Anoka and drains into a little pothole. How would that water be taken care of? The Engineering Assistant said the water also comes down on McKinley Street. Some catch basins could be installed and the water piped to the pond. This would not be the ultimate system, but is far less expensive than a storm sewer. However, eventually the storm sewer would probably go in. Walter Tyler, 1456 64th Avenue: Five years ago they moved into their house. The lot is four lots away from the proposed property. They had water in the basement at that time. He understood the original ditch was put in 25 years ago. In the past five years there has been no water, no problem because he filled in the ditch and landscaped the yard. He would object to the open ditch. Mr. Richard Janiak, 1655 Mississippi Street: Mr. Ernst pointed out this drainage ditch would cost only $50.00 per lot. Mr. Janiak said he called Councilman Kelshaw who said he didn't believe the City would allow an open drainage ditch for a period of more than one or two years. The cost of a drainage ditch would pay a good part of the price of the storm sewer, he believed. Mr. Richard Kok, 6517 Mc Kinley Street: He said that Mr. Ernst mentioned ' 74 lots, and also said this would not be a burden on the school district. If there are 74 lots with double bungalows, there will be 140 units. ' ' �l Mr. Ernst answered the 74 lots would have mixed dwellings, single and two f amily. He did not know the ratio of the single to the double at this time. Hawever, if they were all single lots, there would be 105 lots. What effect would this be on the sewer and water was asked by Mr. Kok. The Engineering Assistant said the answer on sewer and water is that the design used for put- 1 ' ' � � ' � ' � ' IJ � � ' � ' 2; �lann�nQ �am�i�sion Meetin� - Januarv 'l:, 1971 Page 5 ting in the municipal system includes a large safety factor so that 105 units versus 148 units is such a small,percentage in the total of the area, it would not cause a problem in the capacity of water. Roy Holman, 6500 Fridley Street: How can Mississippi Street handle the additional traffic from this project when it cannot handle what th�r� is now? Darrel Clark said he was sure Mississippi Street will have to be widened whether or not this development goes through. Mr. Weiland asked if Chairman Erickson will have any vote in this matter? Will he vote and make recommendation to the Council? Vice Chairman Fitzpatrick said he would not know whether or not Mr. Erickson would vote. He did know that quite often one member or another exempts himself if he has an interest in the request. Mr. Weiland felt there would be a conflict of interest in this case. Mr. Walter Tyler said the people on 64th paid for their street out of their own pockets. If 64th Street went through to Stinson Boulevard, he was wondering what the traffic would do to that 3 inch base temporary street? Would that street last until 1977 if it takes additional traffic. The Engineering Assistant said this development does not have many lots with direct access to 64th Street. He did not think the increased traffic would be on 64th. Mr. Walter Tyler commented that when Mississippi Street becomes crowded, the people will take the side streets, especially in the morning and night. You have got to realize all the shopping centers are on the West of this area -- Target, Holiday, Shoppers' City, Country Club. There is nothing on the East except the New Brighton Super Valu. Mr. Robert Erickson said that it is obvious at this point that the plan Mr. Ernst brought in is not acceptable and is definitely not the proper zoning. Mrs. Willa Gonsior, 1601 Rice Creek Road: She and her husband are the main owner of the proposed property. She said that when a person gets up to social security days, one has to sell some of the holdings because of taxes. What are they supposed to do? Mr. Robert Erickson told her that he thought it was beautiful property, but not at the expense of additional taxes to the rest of the area. Mr. Ted Gonsior, 1601 Rice Creek Road: He said it was now that he needed ' the money. Speaking to Mr. Erickson, he asked him if it were his property, and if he were in his reclining years, how did he think he could handle it? He was not able to get money like you fellows are getting now. He worked for $2.25 ' an hour. Since 1950 he had been paying taxes on this property -- $5,000 a year. He had tried to get a permit to fill in the property but the City would not allow him to do so. He lived on the property since 1962. � ' Mr. Robert Erickson said he left Chicago ten years ago, where he saw the slum area creeping into a residential area when the land was rezoned. This is why he was going to fight to maintain the present zoning. To go to any other zoning from what there is in the existing zoning, degradation will begin. ' ' ' ' ' ' ' � � ' � ' ' ' � i ' �r�� ` Plannin� Commission Meeting -,larivary 2�, 1971 Page 6 He felt Mr. Ernst had not presented a full proposal. Diane Maloney, 6550 MrKinley Street: She wondered where the people will be found who will want to live next door to the proposed project. She objected to the rezoning. Mr. Jerald Tjader, 6563 Fridley Street: He said he had been talking with Mr. Ernst and Mr. Clark. He was not in f avor of R-2 zoning, but neither in R-1. These people that have the land right now, are paying too many taxes. He thought the City of Fridley should step in and either make it a park or let the State and County do it. He would like it to remain as it is now. He thought someone should take this land off these people's hands. He had talked with people inter- ested in conservation on the local, state and national level. They are sending out people to look at the land. A staff man of the Metropolitan Council said they are interested in hearing about this piece of land and of other land for conservancy. He was going to pass a petition to the people of the neighborhood to present the land to the City for park and the petition will be given to Mr. Fitzpatrick on Monday. If the rezoning request should be turned down, and if the people wanted to sell, the next step would be to see if the City has the funds to buy the land. Daryl Wolf, 6446 A.rthur Street: He had all he could do now to pay the taxes let alone bringing in more sewers. He felt the City does not need any more rezoning than what it has now. He approved acquiring the land for park. Robert R. Pence, 1489 64th Pvenue: He suggested studying the petition and the names on it. He felt the members of the Planning Commission knew a lot of the people. He didn�t think the signers of the petition wrote their names just for the fun of it. He had heard both sides. He didn't need rezoning regardless, but he knows what he likes and the previouS gentleman's statement about a park is the solution. Mr. LaMoine Follingstad, 1626 Rice Creek Road: About all these people that talk about parks -- when the Park Department came out with a program for proposed parks,� and asked for approval for a Park Bond, everybody shot it down. They wanted no part of it. Vice Chairman Fitzpatrick said that it was true there was a park bond issue, and that there would have to be some such thing in the future to provide funds for what the people are proposing. Mr. Alvin E. Flanders, 6501 Anoka Street: He said he signed the petition against the rezoning. He Grished, again, to go on record as opposinR it. MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Zeglen, that the PZanning Commissign close the public hearing of the rezoning request, ZOA 1�70-07, Richland, Incorpc�rated by R. C. Ernst to rezone from R-1 (single family dwellings) to R-2 (two �amily dwellings) the South 395 feet of Lot 1, Lots 2 and 3, Lot 4, except that'part of the West 132 feet lying South of the North 328.9 feet, Lots 5 and�6 except the South 230 feet thereof, Avditor's Subdivision No. 22. (lpon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ' Me�ber Schmedeke sum:�arized his feelings as follows: Ecology -- he, to�, was interested in ecology, but he also sympathized with the'property owner. The . Planning Commission is an �dV�spry Body to the Council. They do not make the � final decision. The Planning Commission considers the property owner, the ' residents and pro�ert� owners within 300 feet of the property in question, and the City comes last. This evening wa� ttie fi�st time that youz side of the � �J pLar�nin�Cc�m*.��ci�r Meetin� - .Jan�arv `?'�9 �.971 page � story has been heard. Two weeks from now, the Planning Commission meets again. He was going to make a motion to table this item un�il the next meeting. The reason for this is, in the first place, whether or not to rezone. He sympathized with the owner because he also owns property and he would surely hate to have someone say to him "you have a beautiful piece of property" and then have it faken for half of what it is worth. The City has parks now that G--� n�t developed We have been given a piece of property by View Con (South of Gardena, West of Stinson Boulevard) which will be park property. Maybe there is need for another Bond issue, he did not know. But he could not see telling a man who owned property a long time that his petition would be denied or he should take half of what it was worth to make a park out of it. There are always two sides to an issue. Referring to the map presented earlier in the meeting, Mr. Schmedeke said the Hyde Park area was colored in green which was the designation by Mr. Weiland for R-2. Hyde Park is zoned R-3 and C-2 and was rezoned within the last six months. He continued that anyone can come in and ask for rezoning, and the petitioner this evening has the same right. It does not mean that he, personally, was going to vote for the request or that he was going to vote against -- he was not saying. Then, as "food for thought", Mr. Schmedeke asked what would be the feeling if the petitioner came in with a plan for R-1? Mr. Robert Erickson: He said he felt some of the land should be R-1 and some wildlife preserve. Mr. Walter Tyler: Referring to the drainage ditch, he said that it must be about 20 to 25 years ago the ditch was put through there. He moved in 1965. All the property in the area was condemned because of water. The people have brought up their property from the condemned status. Now what will the property be if another ditch is put through there? Mr. Roy De Mars: The three houses on the South side of 64th Avenue begin- ning at the corner were new homes and condemned because of water in the base- ments. Mr. Schmedeke, referring to the traffic, said the Planning Commission had the same type of problem with Viewcon. Whenever someone builds, there is going to be traffic. One way or another, vacant property is going to be developed. He did not think the traffic would be heavier with the present request or another one. A citizen said that there are ways of routing traffic so that it does not go into residential area. Member Zeglen said that he agreed with Mr. Schmedeke, that the Planning Commission has to have more time to study and evaluate the request. He also felt there should be at least four members to vote. MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Commission table the rezoning request, ZOA #70-07, RichZand, Incorporated by R. C. Ernst, to the February 3, 1971 meeting. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. At the reguest of Mr. Robert Erickson, the follawing motion was made: MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Zeglen, that the En_qineering Department be instructed to mail to the people Iisted in the January 20, 1971 Agenda a notifi- cation of the February 3, 197� meeting. Upon a voice vote, aI1 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. ��.. �� lann.in Gommission Mee..*_i�� -- ;:?�Y-��a�y �;?, i971 Pa�e R 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. ��71-01, CHAR.LES R. LA BEAUX: To split off the S� of the E� of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision ��92. Mr. La Beaux was present. Mr. Schmedeke explained that this request was before the Plats & Subdivisions Streets & Utilities Subcommittee earlier in the evening. Mr. La BLaux is attempt- ing to sell the house on the front part of the lot. The lots to the South, Lots 40, 41, 42, 45, 46, 47, 4$, 50, 51 and 52 have been acquired by the City for park purposes and the possibility is that the City will want a street access at the northern edge of the proposed park. Mr. La Beaux has agreed to give a 30 foot easement on the South end of his property which will also line up with a similar easement on Lot 35. The City would be asked to put a red tag on the South Half of the lot until such date that street, sewer and water are put in before Mr. La Beaux can build. The recommendation to the Planning Commission was approval. The Engineering Assistant property going tax forfeit. In or adjacent property were to go ` to extend the park boundary on would not be a piece of ground added that some people worry about this sort of this case, with a park adjacent, if this property tax forfeit, the City would take the property the North. If it should go tax forfeit, it lying unused. MbTION by Zeglen, seconded by Schmedeke, that the PZanning Commission recom- mend approval of Lot Split #71-OZ, by Charles R. La Beaux to split off the South Ha1f of the East Ha1f of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision #192 with the stipulation of the dedication of the Southerly 30 feet of Lot 34 for street purposes, and that no building permi.t be granted until the lot can be serviced by sewer, water and street. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. #71-02, THOMAS R. SWANSON: Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 5, City View Addition. To make two 60 foot lots from three 40 foot lots. Mr. Swanson was present. Mr. Schmedeke explained that this item was also presented to the Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcommittee earlier this evening. This is one of the normal things that seems to be happening in Fridley -- taking three forty foot lots and making two 60 foot lots. The Subcommittee approved this type of request a number of times in the past and they approved this one, too. He was certain the homes Mr. Swanson would build would be compatible in this area, and probably more so. The homes will be facing 57th Place and will be seen from the front and back as the backyard would abut 57th Avenue. Mr. Swanson said the houses would be ramblers and he would use Masonite. Darrel Clark added that there were homes on either side of these lots, so that there is no more land available. , C � � � ' � , ��. u `: Plan��n�; Comqnission Me��intt -- ,7arivar �F�, 19%1 PaRe 9 MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Ze_q1en, that the Planning Commission approve Lot Sp1it #70-02, by Thomas R. Swanson to split Lots 3, 4 and S, Block 5, City View Addition in order to make two 60 foot luts out of three forty foot Zots. Upon a vdice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 4. CONFIRM PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Request for a Special Use Permi�, SP 4171�-01 by Albert M. Johnson to permit construction of a double bungalow in an R-1 District as per Fridley City Code, Section 45.051, Paragraph 3, Subsection D, to be located on Lot 7, Block 1, Al Rose Addition. MOTION by Schmedeke, sec,onded by �eqlen, that the Planning Commission con- firm the publi c hearing date of February 3, 1971 for the Special Use Permit request, SP #71-01 by Alhert M. Johnson to permit construction of a double bunqalow in an R-1 District to be located on Lot 7, BZock 1, A1 Rose Addition. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 5. CONFIRM PUBLIC HEARING DATE; Rezoning request, ZOA 1�71-01, by Wyman Smith � for Viking Chevrolet, Inc. To rezone from M-2 to C-2 a parcel 600 feet in depth along the centerline of proposed 83rd Ave. from R/W line of Univer- sity and 1,675 feet North from centerline of proposed 83rd Avenue. , � � MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Schmedeke, that the Planning Commission con- firm the pvblic hearing date of February 3, 1971 for the Rezoning Request, ZOA #7Z-01 by Wyman Smith for Viking Chevrolet, Inc, to rezone from M-2 to C-2 a parcel 600 feet in depth along the centerline of proposed 83rd Avenue from R/W line of Uni vers�ity Avenue and 1,675 feet North from centerline of proposed 83rd Avenue. Upon a voice vote, a1Z votinq aye, the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT • There being no further business, Vice Chairman Fitzpatrick adjourned the Planning Comanission meeting at 10:10 P.M. Respectfully submitted �/.� G��- Haz 0'Brian Recording Secretary � � , � ' ' � ' , � ' Ti� MINUTES OF �H.E �OA,RD �F At PEA3�S MEETIIVG OF JANUA,RY 26 1971 The me�eting was cai�ed to order by Chaizman Minish at 7:30 P.M. rIF1�IZBERS PRESENT: Minish, Ahonen, Drigans, Harju MErIBERS ABSENT: Sondheimer OTHERS PRESENT: A1 Bagstad-Building Official Chaixman Minish extended his welcome to Mr. Harju. MOTION by Drigans to approve the minutes of the December 15, 1970 meeting. Seconded by Ahonen. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Minish reported the action taken by the Council on the December 15, 1970 Board items. 1. A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF• SECTION 45 113 5B FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM FLOOR ARF.A REQUIREMENT FOR A STRUCTURE IN CR 2 ZONING FROM 2500 SQUARE FEET TO 1200� SQUARE FEET AND SECTION 56 05 5A FRIDLEY CITY CODE Z� INCREASE THE MAXIMZJM ARF.�, gEQUIRF��TT FOR A FREE STANDING SIGN IN CR 2 ZONING FROM 48 SQUARE_ FEET TO 1$� SOI7ARF. FF.FT T(1 AT T n�t mvs� nnwTemnrrnmT.,�. .,t, ... ON T.(YP 11 Mr. Melvin Grell and Mr. David Moe, representatives of American Family Insurance, and Mr. A1 Hoffineyer, architect, were present to preser.t the request. A site plan and building plans were submitted to the Board for review. Mr. Hoffineyer stated the building has been revised to be 31 x 44 feet so the variance would be from 1200 to 1364 square feet. The building will be set back 60 feet and will line up with the Pet Clinic which is on the lot adjacent to the North. There will be only one ingress off the service road and one egress onto the service road. Mr. Grell explained the only business that will be conducted at this building will be estimating the cost of damages to cars that were involved in minor accidents and are still driveable. The complete cycle of a car coming in, damages being estimated and a c�,c:ck written out would be approximately 30 minutes or less, and there would be about 20 cars a day using this service. The building would have a working force of two people; a teller and an estimato.r. Mr. Grell stated it will be less expensive for the company to have two people at this building than to have men go around to the homes and make estimateso He said the main reason they are asking for the variance on floor area is simply because they do not need a larger building. A building of this size will handle the Northern area very well. The Board asked if there would be any cars left at the building overnight. Mr. Grell answered the cars that use this service must be driveable. There would be no towing of cars in to be estimated and there would be no cars left at any ti.me. �� ' � � � � � ' ' ' , � ' � � The Minutes of the Board of Aupeals Meetin� of Januarv 26, 1971 Pasze 2 The Board asked where the sign would be located and why they needed such a large sign since this type of business did not need to attract the attention of the passing traffic? Mr. Grell atiswered the sign will be located on the island between the ingress and egress lanes. It will be in line with the Pet Clinic sign and it will be facing the same way. He continued the people that would be using their service would possibly only come out to the office once or twice in their lifetime and since the ingress is not directly off from University Avenue we want them to be able to find it, and of course it is advertising for the company. Mr. Grell added they were hoping with a bigger sign they could use the base for storage of lawnmowers, etc., as the building itself has no storage area. The Board asked what the sign would say? Mr. Moe answered the sign would have the company emblem with the wording of American Family Insurance Drive In Clai.ms Service. Mr. Grell stated the amount of lettering to be put on the sign makes it difficult to stay within the sign size requirement and still have a sign that is readable from University Avenue. The Board explained to the applicants the sign ordinance was written up to try and keep all new signs in any zoning district as close to a uniform size as possible to enhance the appearance of the whole City. Chairman Minish read a letter reoeived from Commerce Park Rentals, property owners within 200 feet of Lot 11, stating they had no objection to the variances. MUTION by Ahonen to receive theletter from Cotmierce Park Rentals. Seconded by Harju. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. MOTYON by Drigans to reconrmend to the Council approval of the variance to reduce the minimum floor area requirement from 2500 aquare feet to 1364 aquare feet for the following reasons: 1. The nature of the business does not require anything larger. 2. It is comparable with the Pet Clinic so there will not be a teetering effe�ct. 3. The architectural plans are very attractive and will add to the appearance of the com�runity. 1 Seconded by Ahonen. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Grell stated they have requested 180 square feet of sign area but if the ' Board feels it cannot grant this variance at this time he would be willing to accept less square•footage. � � �-. u,�, � ' The Minutes of the Board of Avpeals Meetint� of Januarv 26, 1971 Pa�e 3 ' Chaixman Minish informed the applicant that if the Board was to deny the sign size variance the applicant could not apply for another variance on this sign for 6 months. ' Mr. Grell stated he would withdraw the request for the sign size variance until their sign engineers can compute the necessary footage requirements and still maintain the height to depth ratio that is required by their � registered emblem. If it is felt at that time that they cannot adequately display their emblem in accordance with the specifications they will then appear before the Board again with a more precise request. � ADJOURDII�NT : � Chairman Minish adjourned the meeting at 8:20 P.M. � Respectfully submitted, � �.� , MARY HIN � Secretary � , , � , ' � ' , �� ' .. � ''- ��!�� .� r'f�. �� i �.'� .' 1 . �� ' � t �. ,A �� i� o ridle � � ANOKA COUNTY 6131 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE 1 �� ►� � TO: NORTFiERN STATES POWER COMPANy 1 4501 68TH AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MINN. 55428 seo-�aso FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 58/21 PLEASE MAKE A SURVEY AND PROCEED WITH THE INSTALLATION OF THE NECESSARY STREET LIGHTS FOR: ' 1. Curve on 57th F� Jef�ierson 2. Near Night Depository at New Post Office � 3. N.W. Corner of Skywood Court �. S.E. Corner of Ruth Circle ' 5. 69th Place � Rice Creek Blvd. � 6. 5837 Arthur Street 7. Mid-block 66th Way Bet. Hickory St. � Ashton Ave. , 8. 75th Ave. � Hayes St. 9. 76th Ave. � Hayes St. � 10. Bacon St. � Meadowmoor Dr. � 11. Lyric Lane � Jackson St. 12. Washington St. Bet. 68th Ave. � Madison St. ,13. Lyric Lane $ Madis�bn St. � 14. Gardena Ln. F� Woody Ln. 15. Regis Trail �, Regis Ter. , 16. 5th St. So. of 694 Outerdrive 3� Mercury Vapor 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt ' 1 TO BE CHARGED TO THE PARKS �, RECREATION DEPT. 1 17. Logan Park � 18. Altura Park 19. Plymouth Square Park � 20. Oak Hill Park 21. Commons Pa:k In Hockey Parking Lot ' 22. Commons Park In Softball Parking Lot South , 23. Terrace �Park 24. Flanery Park ' 25. Moore Lake Park 26. Hackman Park � I ' ' ' . ' � ' � ' ' ORDER L1ATE : VERY TRULY YOURS NASIM M. QURESHI, P,E. City Engineer-Director of Planning � 3;� Mercury Vapor 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt 175 Watt � � . � . ,� � �. LOCATION � Onondaga St. F� Bacon Dr. ' 2. 75th Ave. F� Arthur St. � 76th Ave. F� Arthur St. , 1 ' ' ' ' , ' ' � ' 1971 S��Z::::�;`.: i.��ii`rtr� PROG�tAb1 RE�`�E.��'r'IL �1(`�;D CHA"JGES CHANGES REQUESTED eplace 6000L (405W) O.H. ncandescent Street Lights ith 175 W. (6000L) O.H. ercury Vapor Lights SAME SAI�1E CITY ORDF� DATE 3� N.S.P. COMPLETID - ' - �� ` V�� t ' \ . � / s � 6 ///// � V V A � . . . , , , , , , s�iio ��.• i ii�/i //// �/////, � � °'u . �� 0 E s �� e g e ' e �. ,�„'°" ,� a S� s ` � N 3 �\\ 6- fi� i � \\ \' �A,R 6 -� e 'T Gi.'� 1 ST. � 6 �s \\� ��\ �„e� e \1' d � w �. ' 2 ,M 2 c �. � i — - 2 Sz. t�Y � �" avr. 2 — � , � e '� � I I i\6 r�l. E 2 p.� � � \\ I I I I I � � 2 4 bs 8 1, � I�� . Ga� \ I'�) I �\ � �� . I I� \ /� � /� 1 /� /� ' �/ i �• STREET LIGHTS ORDERED AND � INSTALLED IN 1970 i / / � � _ X STREET LIGHTS PROPOSED IN PHASE i ' ONE FOR 1971 � �� 63 �' Q� ■ �% ■ �� ; � 0,� . � 1 / � , , � . . � � . ' � 4 / • / ,we / / � / , ' / / / j '� � �' �� . � �' ///// I y � �I y5 j , � �,,.�� I�/ � A ' / �S� � / / `� � ,►� t � '% � � � � �; �, � ,- . � : / � � Y� i ` � / i i i i i i i i . i � i a 1 I R � � � s % s � � s _ � a e e' 4 wt � s °u^� cr. j r 1 � � �� \vr M.r ° ��+. s } ' ,4,.,., .- � � . � � , . �� !�w � ' � �I � �' � :� s a� � ,�+�_ � � � I/I/ f.:?T�': �r�/1��%T� � s �,' , A � ,, /Yi 1 1 4 y�� X� � F 1 � `' ��, 4 k. �' � 2 _ N / t iv� �.� a e • a ..� e � a .,� ,o z w�'`' �. ' z �"� z z � z � 6 y = ` f S en �.a. � 1 2 2 Z� 2 ' • • • ' • ' 2 ri�ce°cr 6 t 2 9T. P�NOORq _ aa +�'e�aa..2 � �e , 6 s 2 ' v.a�was*oM �P e e • : � • j, 6 6 �sN �• s a. ' �' , � • s e, � 4 ��. „� �.E s 4 � .+r:�ss • a: � y � �' e e s T � V =� � = w ' Av 3 W ` F , � � • • • �`'• �"� � � � • • • • • ,,. ' — r � � N. f • AIOJRE > 2 , » ►��. ve ��2 �AKE s1� Yrt 4 j f �M •. t � s, e,e. I 3 . Q� " w,= ' sa P` Y ! Ay �iwf � � y � '� ♦ � �• � ? CAllip o uwr • . No. c,qy. � \ CvE(� � � � � � �t ��_ M V n , 3 a � ' s�i: e.� � � �� FR/OLEY v� / / // / / / / //. /// / // i /( / COLf/MB/A HE/CHTS ' . ez- � �..: , cwow�se � � .A.� �.f �s = Avses 3 % ' � ?v ��w �- — — � � � � � • w•<t_ � � �..c. e � � � 2 � � .y. � �e 2 z �////// e e s :., � 6'� STREET UGHTS ORDERED AND INSTALLED IN 1970 . • i "g ` I X STREET LIGHTS PR4POSED IN PHASE •= I ONE FOR 1971 ° 3 . 6 s e e ° g I � o y �� "°'' �%� ~ T fi � �� Q � � RK! f /!.r � � I;y .o. �—�,� 2 �J � �� ! j '� � 1t��" Ip " Kr�r �.. � o �o i ' gt i� X � / ; �' / � � / � / % / t %U l�war no. / r e `,P ` � c,. . i i 52 ; �� I : � --� . _ . c�� I�. ��%� , '1 ,� , ,, ; O � � } � __� ;/W ti I ; �/�1 •.( �� 2/� 1 • I)+ .']( " 1 .. �/ � 1� , i � ��,, � �:. L. H. 7-31-61 �RAN'N� — REVISIONS DAT� 1 CORR_ �A�PPRO�VED -- t—=rT_��i _. �. _ _ �, . 40.., . � i /, 'l i A F' h y ,o,., . ,,,,. ; �. - �--�- - � STREET LIGHTS ORDERED AND I INSTALLED IN 1970 ��; �� X STREET L16HTS PROPOSED IN PHASEI ONE FOR 1971 O ' '' ' . � ' 6 - o1,�t�,n Se� �� o'� � �► -�- o � � � '°�' R � o,� �� ¢ � �- , � � TH'IN CITl�� Capitol Square Building, Cedar Street at lOth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 227-9421 ' , ' r:��•i��.:�DLM ' . �� 1 , , 191C� ' � ' � T0: LOCAL GOVER�;�lE'VT iR�TITS Ai�D CGNcr;I,TI"<G P..��; �I�;i.ER� , F3.��JM: RI��:r.ZD .T. i?vL'i�HER::'i, CN.i.E�` AD�?Iti � �T��e?'COR SUBJECT: CO'�1PicEIi�NSIVE SE'v7LF. PL.:'��; � — , ' � ' ' The MeLropol:tan Gouncil a,:ogted o:i �anu�•r�� 22., .197^ th�i.r rietronolitan t'ie�v��Iopin�nt G�iide For Sar.itary Se�,rers ii► the. . :�Ietru��olii4n Ar�a ir. : ccordance �aith t?�e Metropoi itar. Sewer Act, CCt3�tC:' 44;', 1'�69 S��ssion Lacas. Cne of the provisions of th� Se�sr�t: F.c.r_ ;.c u; PCIIIJ rpn�pr,t that m��nicipalities and lccal � goverr�rie.�i: ��,:;i �s adopt a compreht,'T151 V2 plau far coi? cction tre.atrnen.': �ild di��,�i�a1 of s�:va^e a�� soon as pr<�ctica�le aitei: anoptian o'r" rhe ?�'F��rn�clic�ri ;;our.ci? pl;r.. We str_on��y :i;.�;e e�ch locaJ. �overnm:r.t t;� undertake '�hi ; ��ori� �� Y��:c!:'; ar poscf.t�l� anc± ret�ir the necessnr;% �n� n�r�? h...- - - services t,� �..��,.c�= i:�iat this pian wa�1G be_ avail,:;�JZE' i;r �he very r�ea?� fut.ure. If t?ie S:.��?- Board caa �e ��f ur_y ser,;i�� to you i.n ��s re-;aY-d, W0 Wl�l tiJE.' 1L`�;;t happy t0 bc FiV37i3hiC 2t n T.11�L?S�.iy 8�L'eL�.1j<<' t IP:C . ��-.�. , . ----4 � �'' •...`� � . .� �r✓ �' \ �-_w'�,...... � g �.� �\�� '"�� E . '�..�R�,,,.�-- f- -°�• . � y � �� R,I�:: ieu�.,� K – `� �� ', An Agency oY the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area Anoka Coixnty o Carver County o Dakota Counry o Hennepin County o Ramsey Couniy e Scott County o Washington County 0 0 . �. �, ::: I i._._:._ a � � .. � 4z . � �' r - � � _ �� " � � � � f,: � � N Q N � O � . �J � � � 6� �� V' �7 M � ' t` O� M� cV �e �� 7� N� M j i� u u u a �� Lj Cj u w „ w �� w ' v c? y � , � m C� F- O J W m 4 K 1- O J W �: ' V,1 : ! . � � i � � � O M i i O � � � �� Z � � ; � _ x X_. x � i F_ r' —" �� i 4 � �° '°° ��' � � � � � �� ' � �, �� _� Q `V c� `� ,„ " �. �_ ti, ' � � a � � �� \ �--- � � $ � i i � d' c� - �e � I �1 j ' Q` � � m �► � g° � �I � � --- —: �.— � � � � ..� � ��, � � �_ -- �``� Q � � �— � � ' . .��. ""-.�. � 1 �'` � ` �/� d !-i 10 9 __► o ,. t pP� �' � z _' _ __ ._ \S'� ' _ ,�.�,,.... ' 1 - -�-..,... ' '•�...... �■ a� so a� 'f � �t'� � �` i � O M O o'' a. 1A a M � ! �. � �f d' � � �i CD aD ,� -. _'— _ " � � :�i i u'3 / /J' �� m �p a, . ". � � Q U � �. N Q ta� � i �. � � � t t� � � v �. d—"' N O O w i� � �� c� c� a: � � � � � ~ u 1 � �, Z � \ t W � :. I Q r � � � \ '� _. _ p�- - ' ._...._ --_ , y� . ' J 1 � � _ � �� s � �� N - � � � � — � x c.� N o i++ ' W W - � m� W w C] E— I o • Z a ' �i R Z _ .. ' Q�� Ctals� De�d. G�v�r�Nen ¢r Esa� �_�.___�. ��,,.ra i��,<, :` o �;." bff'9er-Da�i�a 'a`.o.. HlnnaMN�. M�•••• � ` ;:�:�e�c�F� Lin3(orm Coa�eY��einQ Nlanlu � � �! : ti �C�� benturei �3�Ia,de thia ................................. ....... day of ......,I.�n�t�ax:Y..... . ... .. ., 19 Z7, , b� e,tzveen ..............................................�ITX...QF....F.RIDLEX....................................................... ' muni cip al �corporu,tion under the ldws of tlu SEate of .. .. _.... Minnesota . . .. . . . .. .. ....................... ..................................................................F�AI L&QAD...A,� CF ��.0 RLES .. COREIIRAT IA�i..... a eorporation under the lawa of the St�te of.. .........New...Yci�.k .......................... party o f the aecond part, .... ., paa•ty of th.e first part, arui ....................................................................... .... . �itne�ge�j, That the said party of the first pcLrt, in eonsticlerdtwn of tha aum of Q�ae�..Do17.az....($1,..QQ)....��td...o�her...good.,and..va�,�able,,.consideration---'------'--- �'��,� .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. , to it in hand par,d by the said party of tju second pa.rt, the receipt whereof i8 hereby acknowledQed, dves hereby Grant, Bdrgai.n, Quitciczim., and Conc�ey unto the scLid party of th.e seeond part, its successora and assigns, Forever, dll the tract..__.. .or pareel........ of land lyin� and bein�s in tlu County of ........................ ......... ..... .. Anoka ,._...., .._. Q� .State of rtlinnesota, described as follou�s, to-wit: The temporary construction easements owned by the party of the first part as evidenced by that certain Certificate of Attorney for Petitioner dated April 20, 1966 filed April 26, 1966 in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Anoka County, Minnesota as Document No. 54959 in, over, under and across the following described property: The North 125 feet of the South 185 feet of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, except tnat part lying West of a line parallel to and 541 feet Easterly of the centerline of the main track of the Ilorthern Pacif3_c Railway Company as the same is laid out and constructed, measured at right angles thereto, and the West 105 feet of _the East 158 feet of the North 1135 feet of the South 1318.75 feet of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79. Said Certiticate does not set forth the termination date of said temporary construction easements. The construction of the improvements for which said easements were obtained, however, has been completed and this Deed is therefore given for the purpose of eviden�ing the fact thaL said tempor- ary construction easements have terminated. The City of Fridley will still retain the Southerly 60 feet together with the Westerly 20 feet of the Easterly 53 feet of said Lot l, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79 for underground utilities. NO STATE DEED TAX REQUIRED This instrument was prepared by the City of Fridley, 6431 University Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota. �'o �.ynbe anb to �oCD tfje �a�tte, Tugeth.er tvith all Ehe hereditaments and appurten,aneea ther� ' un1;o belon�in¢ or in anyuzae ap�riai►ein�, to the eaid party of ihe aecond part, ita suecessors and assi•�na, Fore.ver. � 1 �. 1 � ! � ' � ' � , � � , s��F i'= zoo' �9 SE P 6� ' ' 'TFM P. EASFMENT 3—� -+2.0%I.9AGRE ' ` . PERM. EAS�MENT ' 3 = 0.5008 ��R�- � ;rt- ��1 30l I � I 3 �, � �;I V� � �� w c. �Ii�- V 3 0 � � � W a'1 � 2 � U � � Q o Q. � � � � � w � � OC 2 �,300� 3 .�.. .� �-a ---7,Z0' (N89°54��3"F)--- -- � \ � . h c W C W t w 0 . °C �C AUDITORS SUBDIYISON � NO. 79 - - --- � LOT � (zo, sz A�RE) � 'z . "- �° a �' � � � . � ,�� __----.- --- --------- 1 . �� . � � �_ -��: �_ '- � ' � �� _ . .. �--_=� -'�S '�--- -763.09 ' i5 89'.t7' �/)-- � -,f . I M ; �,, 1�G 5-/3 ' � � �. � � ' � ,. 1 � � � � � � � s�,,�E i•=zoo' z9sEP6s ' � � � _ � i � �� -A P�RM. FASFNI ENT �' - � Jr9I T ACRE � ��'— ---%LO'(N 89°54'43"E�-- : � � R � 1 . �•� 3 i� , �N'� , ��, � l��1,.�, �I �� - � �I ; t ,� zO. Ot ►� -� :.;��. .: k � �l lw " � �€ '� . k ,�., � < � �r� ��, �* : ��a - - � g � �� F �::� 3 : � � ,; Y� w WI � � ;y, U � ,: � �Jo �� _`$R � � �.' J � � }� ,�: ' W V � o � AUD /TORS SUBDI Vf SOr'� � ' � � 0. NO. 79 i `=,,i`� I- = �: � LOT Y � � } � � : tn (iZ O. ,�S�L, AG�t.+S) � � . � i-'�,�' S � � � 1��f ' ��• v � � � � �z � r•.. �-� sr � � 1 � - 1 � � �a� �r ;� 4 a ` � LY ' `� � � . _ : � �> � - ��' �. I Z � �� ; �; ; W �s� . ' AY: � s i.: , m ' � - .?�x`t�'^'� . i �.. 30.7 � ao i � _ °� ` Ii0 ( , � � �_ } 3 105' —�i .A'�'�' f< P t : �` � � L • , 3 , �: �:. , . — � ---'763.09'(S89°;L7'W --- �— T'Fl`�/!P. LASENl�NT �4- -A = 3, � O� J� A cRE /9G 6 /4 . � � =`,�,1 '� •�, ca, �� . � : �-.��::��. ,�`�,. �� , "'�„r `w /- C� � o r��le � � ANOKA C�UNTY F431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NE I�MO Tu : FROM: - DATE: SU3.7i:CT: CITY COliNCIL CITY MANAGER JANUARY Z1, 1971 BOUI� ; i ON POCKET GOPf�RS 560•3450 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 5S421 The County has i:iformed us they wi11 pay a 104 '�ounty per gopher if the City wishes tu match that figure. 1'his practice has not been followed tur the past several years. Some years ago the County did �ay 10� per pocket �opner and the �.ity matched this lOc. '!'he person brinKir; in the p��ckel o��ptier tcE�t wouid be paid 20t ner gopher.� I do �iot know that po�kt�t o��phei�s are that much oi a problem in Fridley. Cinless tlie Counci.l has sume feeling on this matter, I w��uld ju.�t as soor. not becume in��olved in the program t��i.s year. � �� 4 �; O F F I C E O F ANOKA COUI�TY AUDITOR January 18, 1971 "1:arte.rt Grorci,a� Corirrty� isr lt-fi�r�re.rota" C�U��TY 0� A��0�1A ANOKA, MINNESOYA 55303 421-4760 Dear Municipal Clerk: The following resolution was passed by the County Board of Com- missioners at the Januar.y 5, 1971 meeting. "Commissioner Burman made motion that the county will reimburse 10� per pocket gopher to those municipalities or townships that will pay the individual 20� per pocket gopher, and each munici- pality or tocvnship to certify to the county ttie number of pocket gophers, 2nd the county will then reimburse L0� for each pocket gopher certified to on the claini to the county. Commissioner Fields seconded the motion. Motion carried. Very truly yours, �//r.G�?.G�� d-�(;�l�,��'L Churles R. Lef�Lvre Anoka County Auditor crl/lel ��e��i.°�.�� .,�"��'.��,�.�..��,�'"�1�°�',��,�`.�.,��..�� rr �_ir�r--.�-- ,••.. -T -�ri 7 r r� • �,�'�1��`d,�'��fP,�'A��.��,.{`'..t'�i�J°.,Pr.r`�.� ��►�..r'.�''�°�'.f�'_.t'�,�',�''.�`d.� �� •��r r I 'J / f � t � J � . r � ��J; �-- ��ii �:�.�,��,��.�.�.�.�.��,�.,��.,��.��.�'�.��'.� .. `�� --...._�._ �� ` � hr�.�� ' a. . ��OAa/SF�:Od !A•f. e �rs. rs_�roe.r.�esswss r....�. r � `�. :� ��1 �'t�1��1��i I . , � / F :�� 1�y, ! !*1 �� \ �' � �, M - i �`� .. � . ao r aeco/tr,eo � Y, —...�iN �T� .. . � �� e � � �; 1 ,23 za 2s zc � � �! i � �'L�Il,! 1 � Sf� G' ;� 6 - � . � � s z � �� . T � - � � i y / � r q 4 t .� r � q 8 �� , _ _ i 1 �� /!l, t � e � � �. 1" � � �', i � �� P� a � � •i ,,�,' 6 ��"�� : � �� r> 340� . 4 �J � --�.— ... ��.��.� ,�„ .;,�.. y ��.�.�.�� .. t , ,,,,� ............ ,.,, .�.. � � .��......��. �:::`. � ;S; � a Y�k�;,� u�, � ��1, � `1�,�'�'�' ; �rc¢��ii�i iii iii s0 ' i�'� \ ' yyfL� h � , . . �' `� � k`� ��1 i.�ii��i�iii/ iiiii � . �� _ Yiiiiiiiiiiii/ iiii/iiiiii a �i'L i�ii �iiiiiiiii/i�i i///iiiii/i. �c� f; Q� � �A � q� i///// /i/i/ �i///�; i��/i. / / //i/�//i// //i//// \� W �1� L iJoiY �/i/��/ /i/i�� . �� , p, i,� �,P , i. i i�iiiii � �., ii. i i.iiii�i �r iii�i�iii, ,y �SF� � r, '4' L� iiii/iiiiiiiiiiii�i�i�iiii � � i .� iiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiii� �p' � -1 lp y '�,°/" 'Q iiiiiijii iiiiiiii/iiiii/. 9?� �° �� ' 1 pi iiiiiiii iiiiiii,riiiiiiii n .� . `: /i/iii/ ii/i/i/i/i/i//i/. �`L � Q' i /ii�/i /i/�/i/i; i///iii �' „ ��,,,, ,.,,, , ,,,.,>j 1 �� ' 9 �a ,.�. .� �. .� � F, �e g ��.�. ... 0 � �' A - �o �Q,Q� �o .�. x �Pj i./ ,L", ,•ii !ii a , � Q 9 , 5�,,4� ';' � a ti� � , ' -t , • . , ,e � ti v " � ,,;;;, �;,, _ � �� . �.�, . 2 3; � � 1° � � � ' �; :' � „�,.� �� y �� a �.,�ii� i ` . .. , � q tio o� 5 . R Py � � :�.�. �. ti� b � �3 �.�1 i..rvi 7� � � � n ,i � i� :' , � ,� � ,� � . , , %',, ' %a�" , , ' g D �. Op � '� %/�%' � � �. P ��' �i 9 r WP� �' �1a y�y "�S �— �� 3 Y � 5 � : �r� e � � ti �� .� , I �� l ��r ' .� ;�ED {� : .�.� � �.. � 4� � � j �/.` .� . �• � � 0 1� W W C 1- � I i 0 � r � i ,Q� � . $T , R�:�.� , � \ �•� �t I� _ . � � ......,., �r�� :.�a ' , �. ;. " � -- - � -�—�-o -ya, y _. _ _. ; ._ � : � a,� - - _. - . - � -- -- -- os,.,�- ,. '°'' � . ^" 9 , �., a ,� ; < �; r - �--�--...._ _ ;. �.. .� ��.� � . . .—�. ____a +-:.y..__ �' �..�,�..a. r � L " �-.', � r. <��• z C4 _ � �.,,��„ � �� • � � f �' Z � �� C ¢ j .....� .�;� J ,�� ...+Y/ � `� �' �1'r, i- v �i ^ -,� -� � �" y�� , i•< <o- .. `t F' � ' �� V i: : � , � � . � �� ;, � ,� c�v ,r � ° /ii ` - ;T j • � : , A : . �—_� j y7;:'�Lo # � � � �-, / ��` `'� � � • � t 0 + , { � q � �.v9YSI ', -� ,. 'I v ••. _ �V : �� %� ► /`►- �°. � 1: ��{ c „i(�'� � � � 1 � _ • C�p,, � � i f�' `f'�f� " � V' '��/-, � i��'�� , � �\ • . 1, c.'�W' 6; � ' ('� �� ...� j�:��✓ '� fi '♦ • I'y/ = • � � \' ! I ` rv f �` .� �r��:'�� '� t � �� 3' 4 � � � ' � � 1w ` ,� R� Q�'` �1 � �: f� � � �' � �, � �O 9 �J% . . � � ` Yf� ' 11_ a�l � � \ � O � � � '�. V ' : i . ,e p . . ' � ' ' - . � ,.� � �'y * I �F es . '' t � �' ati 'j/�l V� � �x '� � � • � p »/ry, pc ` , � ' 1 •1 � ; . �s� , .. f- , . �. �. �= �� i � a w ° `� � � �;,,'� _� � . - h ►i/ v . ' �ti �. R � : �. a - z e �1 r i w . � + • � � � � . ` , � � � � w < � ^ w , \ e W t \ � � `, j . '` _i . a -� . i : . �ti . •� � V � w . � �► ��. . o, . � t � � � � � q i � � � � f ` � � � � wi ` � \ � � \ ,^ � . ` �\ V ♦ � j � � � � + � N = i , � �� ' •� • i- •�. , : . : ' �, : � . t � � � . 2 i �.ti . . �1 ' : � � i • � : r 9 . � . '� . . . k = ' + ' l t �1t t • , 0 � ' ' O , , ; t '^ � t� � �-1N �Z �% �°, � � � � t►i ° 7 n sb. r°w ° \.y� ci �c i \ • , r . � �1 �3/�d - �, 1�10 � I�0 S b „ b ...... t. ►I/ r5 . iI' 1 : 1H � tN \ . � T 'p' O,' � �l � � � O% 'a '� D .� e � - � 1 � V k � . � � i : � T � � � e . �.f/ a� : = � . '= • : � ; a + a M � � 1i i � • � h ; i v �:�i �el/e.ef ii � � _� , � •f � ' � �nn ; —.... . 1 � s + � � � ` q • o N . � . V � � N �. c . ; ,; �tGl � w s �` : : . p, 0 �!� / 7¢ ti . �l ` � �,�� N + p �� ' � t; o ` / v _ � �7�To ` o � � �,a .i, e � � / � r � �� i �, � �t � `.' � � `�' � \ � � � . - : �„ �, o „�, ; / ,+/ t w _ ` . '�- � 1 .h e g,� o' �� + � - : � •--- =--'- — ~� v— ••-- —�._o � _�: :'rPs�•�--� � �. � ..... —:,C' .. _. , _._�__ _ a '� : b , .. h ;a �: j.- �. •-- —� -¢ �b ' �. , � � �F ` "' � �°e` �`�c' : + • f� � �. a h . . � `� : '` „� . 9�' / . V . ' "�,.� a .°a. � � � .�t.s� � w' ��.�. fi ' ~(�,�'+�i � , . � ' ,� � o , i��; . ,`, h '°* � r, , • , �' � p4 - - . �,'t� �. fi � _ �r' °t p� 3 � °! '� " . • '., •. O �► ,'• � ► ;� � `.� �:, e� '�.,' � `�_., � _ ~'� � � ` �� D,�•� ', _. �` � . . _ � • ' � � � :� � � , �,ei-. � = i �\ �C '� � ^ � f4i •°, ° �s. � � • . I �i �; �/ �� q 'L �� o . vr , - � n� � �. - - s � �.%- Yu � 't �* � q �Il.�� : ,,�+y;1 9 ./� . 1 �` � � Q c, •rQ�� v�,/ apT� ,,r,wA ': � . � . ry',..�.'�.I� ^ �enn�..�� '•�' s, ''�t+-- •� �' �i w :r� •. i �� .�rr��.j'•!. tc: �r`� :, � N .,.{ �,; - .� c ^ 1. � �� \ � •V � ,� �% y, ; � _^ � V 1 � � �' � ,`• v :�i� .-� � ^�; �� ti �—_�� , `� y ,�- .� �:,"r � s � ' ;�,� V'I_K ai ' a: � � •�. � ^ - � ` �a,, t •d � � • ��l,1 , ' _ .S !'� rs },,, ' � � �__. � " /� ';:,'t �' t,••� � •�� •i., �^,^ r \l n i , �y g. '�'. , `� .'' : •�,,5. . ,�� n, - � .,�� , � ., �c�' `-�'� '': � P. ..�:s!� i ,� ilelrri" � �-� �:oFi- � e— '9: .. , ^ .y . ,�� , o � ' �.: c,� � ` � a ;A �f� �� • i - -��+�k �` ^ Y : Ni= Li { � �.�� :.� z1 �� :,r >�,. ,, .; ,� .�, ♦ i,� �� ,. ..— � ��i �. �� ti � �i �j �i ti �� f� .� �� . rt � �� '. r �-• � � � �. I �. � S � � `�� ` � �i. . � �. ( ••-�`i i—� �� : �\ i �i �. � C '� � r r'' ��O fsA�� ` . \� �� w �4 � � ly l.S,*y �I � ". ;� ti � �``� : �' ;; : �,a � � f V _ — __ .` � •,., ' 1 ,� �. �� ° �'� ��J� -� v. 'v� �v 3 -��' . C � St � � � � •.' t .�,/ M•• v n,� 7, t;' �\. ` � � c` "i ` � � p T .,• ,� •`� ; •, < — . �. t �r� '��-�v , �� ,� � ��k � �' � :f K wt �e,. '..� . �� '�l� -.�.1 t .a•A�/ �4s� t��./� .!%�' �0 ' � 0 :�_.. �--:} �� 1= a !� �:l �' r�� . •s�'-�",.'i � _�M l _ �� , 1 ' � � � , � � I � ;�'^- APP6\RENT CCN1'FitBiJ i i(vG FACTQR �iiYSICAL CONDi o 10l�i „!J _ t 2 3 J. pvpuently P�des 1 7 3 ❑❑❑ �nsn�ntiw 1 2 3 trian ❑❑ Q 111eyal w unsafe sp�od ❑❑ � Bicycle valation ❑❑❑ Urder I nfluence ❑ Q❑[f�]1 Tqffit conirpl yi01#tiOn ❑❑ 0 Impadinp traffic ❑❑ p Had been drinkirp ❑ O Q 1,,,,1 Ovl� CM[K IIM ❑❑❑ Othv esuse ❑ 0❑ Had nof Deen drinkiny ❑ �� w�� ❑ ❑ ❑ Blyo�d driver'f co�trol ❑ ❑ ❑ AsIMp ❑ ��[� �mP��pe� pxkinq- ❑❑❑ PWestriin uuse ❑ �❑ illr�t ❑ Rartirq w stoppin9 Q�(� �� ❑❑ Q Improp6r turninq ❑❑ Q OMer de(e�t ❑ 0[7 � Followiny too Clouly � 0❑ D�fective puipment 0❑ �] No�msl ❑ � Q❑ Fsil to yield riyht oi w�y ExO�ain oNer esuse ,. ❑ ❑ ❑ Nosiynal-Impropersiynal � ❑ ❑ � Vision oEscured __ ROAD TYPE TRAffIC CONTROLS ROAD CNARACTER WEATHER R� • ORIVER INTENT BEFORE COLLISIUN ' K J (check ons w mo,. 1« «ch «ir.., �� 1 7 3 1 7 1 �.+ ❑❑ Goirp straiyht aMad w �❑❑ IN�My p tollowiny roadway ❑ ❑ ❑ Sto�b ;n tqffic :� �s . [� ❑ � Chanying lanes or ❑❑❑ I�� i�ssinq i [� ❑ ❑ Makirg rpht :urn � � � ^�dxp��h�` � abj�et or pedtstri,�� ❑ ❑ ❑ Makinq left turrt � ❑ ❑ Skidded ❑ ❑ ❑ Makiny U turn [� ❑ ❑ Otha.fp�cify 0 0 ❑ 5��,;�9 0. �o�;� � ❑ ❑ ❑ Startinp from stop i or park�d position j U�Oe�k„�y EEWAYINTERCHAYG:T�Pz � m rv V. I. M. S. { 1 2 (Check Onel I U �.1 1 d�ivirp lant ❑ Traf(ic siynals � Stnipbt Q] Clear u ❑ Dry ❑ pne wa 1 C� ❑ Y drivi lanas Y ❑ AcuNration Isn� W rW ❑ Vi�W siyn ❑ Curve � CIGUdY ❑ W�t i ❑❑ 3 la�a jQ Sto � u n � Y � Two way ❑ D�cNNStion bne , v � ❑ Rsini Srowy or Ic ❑ FrtewaY ❑ W�i� Area Other ❑ � / w more, divid�d by ❑ None JCMck One) � S^oWmq Intachanye ❑ Outer wnnectiqn c• r�mp , double �int ❑ Q t h o � J LeV N ❑ F o y ROAD DEfECTS ❑ Fr on t s p� R o a d � �� Q❑ 0 or mors s�pantW rosdways � G�� ❑ Otha Q• � ❑ Q Tryd}ic bne Msrk�O ❑ O�feecs (CMck one w ❑ Dinct toanect�on �(� ❑ Hillcrest No Dafects morel ❑ Main Roadwsy 0 Q " '• unm�.ted Spred 2one��! mph ❑ Otha � Construc�ion ❑ On aoa wer T DIAGRAM WHAT MAPPENED �N 1 i_ ,. � ; , i - : i i�� t S H i -; t i ; �--- rt�- , � %%rp�� : .._ ! .i �r ; �- //_�� _.. � :__. -� r-r _,,. �<. 1 . ; .:_ , _.: _ �t 1. _a. _'. ;...� , . _ �. ..:._ � _.-, _ � _ �.� a..l � } _ _ ! .! ' _ 1 7.._ �� . ... _ . ' .. �-� 1 E NOiT , , t' , T . ' T • - � . �;��. �� !�;�i" ��t: . � � I li �� , , /� , � � i -', -.. _,. __' �„_.._�„�. {. . _'_... . ..r..T. ._.-. --._. �-..•... . . -.....� x. �. �...--'- ., ._.._.� _ 4" . . . ' __' __ _".-F--i .. �� J _. � �. 1 � � i � I � j � ' f i { � � " � . ' i � ; j . 1 ( ; � { � 1 , � , ! �, � ` Y � � . - � -. '.� � 1- ��..0 - �_ . -. _ . _ .�. i- L �. -t + :-_ _ � { . ... _ .._ �.. i � i i I �� ' � 1� I i , i� � . � � � i � � � �� i�i ' i , ., r �, . � -(-_r. 4 l.. � ... ` -r r-� _ . t ' � � _ x '. j r _ � . . ... -rT 1 , �� , , , ; t f ` � � � , .. "t T 'f- r- �--9 �. +.-'.t .- ♦ Y ' "_ ' _ ' ' ' _ .r � �.+ `_ � _ ._. � _ ..."__ �"' . . , � � � � ' I � T � � I ! �' 1 . � I t � 1 ,- t'' ^-.��-_..-� 1 i � e � ' 1' .' �.. 1 �-'t-�-� , -- - --� - -F -i.-.- -...._.-_ . . . , � ; - � v-� i i .-.,_ :- L _ - L _. .1 � 1- �-=-i--1.a�r i �_ ,.+___ _,__J-�_t � _ . i ' , , , ___ _.._,; '__•-�t l_�__L.-� -- � � ' F-r-1-i_� � �_; _!_ I ' '.! �L`; � i , i j i j i 1 I � ` � � �_j_ . . . � . � - �-^' t-'�-- . � -. -� --?--r r ^. Y. _ ..:. T .r -i--• � . ...' . - - - _.. . � ; : -' __ -' � F _. _! ! . _ iJ_- , .� 1_� � -� ' �-;_ L r-;. � �� ' _� t Y . :.-a� � Y �� . _ . - - , _.. .� `_i -- i � i- �; � .-�.r � �. - i � • -� --i- � ^--r � ..r ,-i -� _T 1 �. � - � t' `-.i_ � i -: _f. f _ � ' . ; _ � . _ ._ ' ... i .._ � � , - ; � . � � .t.. � � t . _ . .. . � f 1 f I I � , _+ _ .. . _. _ _ ` . . _ _. , j `- r 1. . _ � ( � 1 � } L _ ._ • - - - -- �. � �� - - _ -- - � - . . _ � �.' � .��f� ��1��-__P,�G�C;Li�1J�'T(L�! _ 1. �..... � � ` ` ' �. :--�1 F � .�}i _. _ _ __ _ _ _ _. _ _. ' �� ' i ,; r r.y�-r � � --t�a�'.� - :i,";�'�`''�� - � - �- -- � _ . -- - -�I�, ��l,�� -�(� -' �4----•.--._- ' �_' _ _ _ : '-fiiT-l� _ __ __ _ _ . � � T - -,,, -;,,- - _ __.. � . . . r . , ._ _ ._ : � _ _ _. , . ; vc��,n�est YYnA I nqYYtNtU: IHefer to Vshicle or Drivn by Number) � � , �/ Narr� W Addra T � E Name S Addre S r• � 1 W. PQLICE ACTIVI7Y. r R�commendationf: ❑ Engineering � ❑ Physical EKam 1 Driven Incl�de Reason For ecommendation � ❑ 1 ❑ 2 ❑ � ❑ Driver Exam � � � CHARGE - �RIVER O 1 O 2 ❑ 3 G PENDING ASSISTING OFFICER �Friale;L P.D. INVEST�T NGOFfICER'SSIGNATURE X .tt �� , .-; ��,� CHARGE - DRIVER ❑ 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 O PENDING GE' N0. DEPT. " CITY 12 Polico Fridle � , � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING REPORT RE; BURLINGTON NORTHERN AAILRGIAD CROSSINGS Location 1. 43rd Avenue 2 . I . ��694 3. Mississippi St. 4. Osborne Road 5 . 77th 6. 79th 7. S. of Liberty 8. Ironton 9. 83rd 10. $5th Existing Statua Grade Crossing with Flashing Light Underpass Grade Crossing with Flashing Light and Arms Grade Crossing with Flashing Light and Arms Grade Crossing with Stop Sign Grade Croasing with No Sign Grade Crossing with No Sign Grade Crossing with Flashing Lights JANUARY 28, 1971 Changes Planned Overpass , Expansion to the Bridge Underpass No Change Possible Elimination Grade Crossing with Flashing Lights Relocate to 79th Relocate to 83rd Grade Crossing with Flashing Lights Arms Added NOTES: 1. All of these railroad crossings existed before the incorporation of the Village of Fridley. 2. Eight croasings exist now, eventually we can end up with seven. 3� Only one of the eight crossings has a grade separation. now, plans are that three of these will have a grade separation. J1 k �, �� _�� desH � s ."i3i avN - �� v� �� 1%l��'��\ �� _ �� —�� v 0 3 ., � ��'" 9n G�'� �tlV� � -�r- _'_ -. .._ >_�.- oI ' ..__ � --. .c. .n 1fi. _� !' �.1♦ � ¢ 1 " , " �..3"an-v -�j—J;_,.-- r_ __..,i '.,_-t.\ .,�-. -� ;-.- - z. . ..�� i��v.'' �,f ��`�'.`y�-3 . `\ N _ �- _ a� __ _ t I s �e r 5��, , ` � "— �l__.�� ?L.1 p � , � (� . _ _ _ , � � ��-�-f c I ..� __ __- ��v H a tl O l Y � ,�` � ' � I F� n l ��_ �' �� _ , .. -2I�� ~ � , �1 �� ,��_� �� ,��'' ��'�� -- � _— _� S�, � ;��1(�`��s S�_ 1 � ltle I �_ I ��LI M.. �r�('- �l� -II ; -�f�' 1 Ir _ h : r --�Iry, _1 _ � � � - r sT''J�L_�, L �---� <.I� .... �l �. A X � II ' i �^ 1 ._J � L._� ^I } ~ ��'` � I ��C ; �� , a �- � - ,;� =�l' Y .� T 't -_ � ; , . ,� ' I� = � � � � �a � - ;�� N� 3 � �„ ' D * _ )'�� _ �— L—�U � ,f—�--z��r�� ,. '� Q� . , „ � , � O �-� � 3A� iH��ei„ � r '.0� ��- `eY p�A � °�i ��__�' �� , ^ p�e i�_i.-- '_ �,__i'2� _—�'.�{ -- - - `'__-'�_— � � � � �q O I _ � . ww �.- . MS'� r � yl� . i r.._ l�' '.-. i �i �,,, � �II I� �r,;+ �■ l �I(,�9`-��.. - nn..l n -��__�f � �� /' � s J� � � I ''� ■ �� inel� �� _ �li �t 9� ��I z 3 � � S nr ~ 7evr s� �---�--� �n� S� nvr^,�-d �_;, : �.�� a� �W ° ■ , ■■ V" F # ,� :�vl O�H �;� �,� '-I � � N 7.:° ��- _ 3 �, �XOMH� '7 ,a w ► � ,: � -. - _ �� ; ' �i -.� x = Q N �;jtlti > > �, W a�s � � _ .oc ^�� ^ ,�� i, , 7�( __ ,� L „ �e ,�; .� �- N l� � �� 1 �� % � I : \" ' � �6* a ■ �N N O N � � � A1 ,�1 I _ � _. O � , 1 i -.-.a� n v y �n`—� � --�� ■) �' ° I � ' - _ - ` � _I IIL�� ' � � .- � � - i n. ; n d-� _:, `��--� i i. 3n �- NN7� Q ' "� � I m� � � C� i u� wEN RD �y_ , ^ a a �nr 3n . _c�� Ji F � = 4 = � J �nv >ss d � ^i;icA' il c- "I - �. � � � o 0 �''��-�-- C- • � i � `i - � w_I f-' � , Q R 'f - ti S 3 �, H� (i�d3H .fl � ' �v v . '___ s� �� NJ J I .- I '��_ i L-1 �L �� s z c----� � ��.-�+� N �'„"�' y J o .�q�a 4� �_�'�1 s n�v nowi z . c. �� t:,�, Vi �Vi - hY' � .. � N I,N o 3nv ' Oldl1 _ . +I �j r t I- m ± ° _ iNl�q � p '^7 I� N. :.N I A �J I i o nf < � • � IN •�., I r p � ny rY .�� I�• . �J 2 G.� .'1'. ,Ki � :. ,. �' � ' • . --3;'�- : .•- �r � 3, � ,,..� 0 £ �� ' --- �� I : � o� L_ � v,.. � .. i... �.. �: . r ; �....�..: ..�....... . . r x � � yO ' t V� , .s a I ��,� � . r 0 � e, �I T S 3t.v MtlOA �:::` 3�� H� o .-Nj _ y { '•a bpA u� � � ,".T•:. S n r a� 1 i ti 3 N 31 � ;:::. z s , � . � �� ,�ee '"' s n� i�OBer p �, . :f?> o h:----- " ' ::�: � o s 3 n v a v oy3 �� :.�t.:'. � W �I a 4 •::`i•i:� • � s MW 6 O ,I ' o v •:3.;,� 1 o z _ �= ti y j� ¢ � f1 _ J /^ y� M �.:'.�'.': '�l N � rl Qi ' x I ll� 1— nr Jhv ! ��i i -� �I� y � : y nr a z ��xa.•�•j./�� rt. .:0� 1 I� H�iaoo �.� � o tl in o� _ � ;Ky m L � � ~�? e.1WO� Z :.;�::.: � L___ � I ..y p ~ q tl NNA� � � r /`- - I� s -� O v'K 1 3 q 191tl9 < �1� I C; 1\Jl s1n0 ♦� � :. � � ZK 0. �ii/F_ �::.: 1 ' NO tl3N1YjM y J{ J �::.i:��: �p I �` � a L-'--.�'_ 3Atl '113r � V4� �i a` ''''I.;' � y -� Q f eJa=��, 3*.. i j p l 9 0� :�i:#?i ; x / R D ( � o � 5 4 ° ,"'i j o 1 �� "` � 4• D�p� s � v . �.. n w. � r i - CC�i;: \� � o� o R � i � _ �, _ � `�;' '_ , ; � � 1 � � ¢ �� P � P�"� ' O °�i - < 3 v ��3r_i.-1 � y�� -r.ar e� i o�l � 0 � r ?ti:•:�� 3 �y.ted �--- "�� r o � , �aEd � � ' H?_ o � �M J o A9�1 h ;i��:: �u a �- x 1 : �i-� y � o� .1 F 1:`:S.';. � i L � �i �' \ J � d � r ' a - "' r. A ;:.: � , ... „ � ? � ._ c :' � � � I �-�.� �" a--- � y tl N N I � • > a �, tia�s �� d-- �---� - r -�,� oa .N � . E�, '� a " aron H ie .k- � :� \c. .- n v c;� � 3 n o t � � z & �� .�,� �� N 0 A Y 1 ��. � i u O O � � Q+ .��Z �\ I � b� � � � � , ��, . 3,o Y � � �:. o ¢ Qr • � b � � f 1 � G� i a � ! s w v 7wf7 1 3 `'�� V I 01 3W � �Vd I�N I Y.d n H15 0- .. . . OA? � • • , • � ' ,c g. � I '' ..� ...,. A3553� I� p o � �� bY��. 'Qi j e �(1(1(1 ^(�_' ::�:1):2 � a c �, n o o . A� •� ///''^��''�� o � N ►T dr3 ti i%}i:; . � , t c�i o N �.�y � �P fi ►.� � ::`�i:�: , o L � 'ro � �iiLi;i ' a 3 ¢ i a E S o � a� �\ � : o . I C w x a >:;f:;t � i o r o W " i . �N h3s z ° � t � f+7 .p Q� � 'i:•i•i: 0�,4 0 F b . y , ' f � o y} 'Z H.� � r � Z :��:`:�' •• t� OC , � � `-' � � rJ O N '.�i i P , _�' � _"- y� w x a Hsne :::t'��a� �..i p4„ Q __.� . � ?o. `�' o0 oNv �� . .Q009 P _ a::.,' z � �::. iy �\ � - i1 OVM�1Qj � :::i:�:: � % , . ,. , od ��Q� ::>f..; D � N2/3N os � . � ° '' - , a�►a� • N I" g � O � J a r" •`;.i'�'. ,-�. �`ys" 11 / . a r . r: Q v tY, N � ; �. ;,. � I a E b n y �::�`.` - s � �� 3pIN5d�r � Q ,�.z y�.�0 �.;�� Otl 33�59HIr Q � � � a .� > ,; � • c �, \�" O )/ \, i W % N ^� � �. .�.... :>.: ! : . Me ` •: � ` u,�` �� N - 1� � . � W � f:: O tl:•, �:� � �� O 1. U v p r � G � £O p �SS3NN9lIrH {: o b 3 Y �'J .� 4 c � :f ' �i 1 aa>r+oN,vws �006$'i ,.___ ' s�BQ � Q, avou va� "�... . - - --s - - , ;: ._ _. .�.. _. ..._ . .,_. �._ _ _ .:a� .. , � � I ' �, �1 I , � , ' , , � � , � , ' � , , ' a. For lots less than 9,000 square feet, the dwelling shall have a first floor area of not less than 768 square feet exclusive of accessory buildings or an attached garage. C. In double bungalows, the minimum total first floor area shall be 1,400square feet, and the minimum living area of any unit shall be 650 square feet exclusive of accessory buildings or an attached garage. 45.055. Parking Requirements 1. Parking Ratio At least one off-street parking stall shall be provided for each dwelling unit. 2• Garage Requirements A. All lots having a minimum lot area of 9,000 square feet shall have a minimum of a single stall garage. B. For lots resulting from lot splits having less than the 75 foot lot width shall have a minimum of a single attached garage. 3. General Provisions A. A properly maintained hard surface driveway is required for each dwelling unit with a garage. B. A gravel or similar type driveway must be properly maintained for each dwelling unit without a garage. Special attention should be made to keep this material from accumulating in the street. C. The required parking stall shall not occupy any portion of a required front.yard. 4. Existing Facilities All existing property occupied by buildings at the date of adoption of this ordinance in this district will confonn to Section 45.055, Parking Requirements, Paragraph 3, General Provisions, by January 1, 1973. , Sj,� Parking xequirements r. f � -- . ___- J' S ' ` t Lond Plonn�n� ��I �� 6B7S -N�9h►,oy ��S NE # , c�,��s��y,�y M„�,k�fti�,s :�. ; .�;,STe�f,;,� EN G I N�E R I�! C, I N C. .,�;,��,J ; ' C�wrl b A1uni� � vl ' t SUnxf4-60.�v ' E��rIF�,�,�� --�--- Enc�ineer_s � Su��veyor�s � 1 � - � , ��a.��lc�� -� ,.,-�.,, ,;> F- �-- i , .�� t,°� �osr ,�� : � . ,-; �; %: .� . , �f � . ' /' �' L , ,'. :� �-�' I � �: �� tl� ' � ` � 1 -� �� . ,_ - - � _ .. . � �: .,. �, I : �, , _ � ��-_ � -� _� - � , _ ' f'� , ` ! � - , �-►' . ..- -, � � �► . • t _f� !� , / � � , r ; : . 1 � �, ��, 'I �t � f �� V, � . � ` � ! �,• � `t � � � . ~''r..��!� � }� � ,: ` - , � , � _ _--� _ _ —', { �. ,b �'� s� . � . ,^��. _ - r� • � At/�� '� 1, " , , K. ` � „ � , � �.. ..L . 'J � ,�[..j`�,� :!' . � , J / T �� .� •� ,� '` ; � ' i t`- �'` `.-. 1 y '� t � � : ' • . � . � . � p ��ra � � � { �� ,, • �: �, - � � �� ,'/'--' : � - . l� ; ; , � �y ,_ �,� 1 .: �� . � �. _ , ,, . . � `,, . � � , r', , . . �� , `,, � � ,�' ' � ' '/ �.' 1. �, � , , , , � . �_$ 0 1 ._ :� , � ., 1 �-- r �av , ! � � � � 3��'� ---�"� �'r - � , i `✓ -�ti, �' �' 'V� - , � _ �, , , ��I . �� , �_' � ' - � _ . , ;. ' "-_ i - .. , _ C�- � ' • , -' �___'-' J � . . ; ; I , i . '��' '� % .. I ,j i i �i ` / .�,- .- - . � , V / l.� / ( i � _ ' . . .> - .. j , �'�� / , -- _ - r ._. -� _ . - � . _''' . / .-- %'. -- � �� -: `.: . k ' / �" d� v S P C� f o �' � 7l, �c, � � • . - � � - _ ; � �!7't�E�� i.t �^/ �!'y �'�'Gl �t;iS 15 O 11 l:;.' Gi :.i G:/�[ �:I rf� %°S.'/.' �,' �: `7 :�[7 ' i/�"✓t�(� ��' ��r.�r,�JrleS l��l£ C.�ICI" Gf^:UN(c ��+sl�� G.i'� i .'�7!y /� � � j'� ' %' - � - � 1 . L `�r' � � /� '� :.�1J.:'fl C ' ; !'; _�%;;�y � �: r�JF.'!1 � „V�:,� li ,.. ;� .�„iZ .::.ini_' : f , CCU, /�:717 Or A'1 Su/� iG;li�. %S SU/�YC(/CC� :U Ti' /�•?�.i _ (�?J J ✓ �� A��y� � SUB U�FAN ENG/NEE�ING . INC. Enpineus E� S��rr�ors ' . ._ -, . • . _. ,�. , -. �J �` �ir �r •' -- — _ __ � . , __ • . � , -_ � ' � � � ��, ��: i �."�"� _„ ..... �- „-k�t;�:�� ' ..� _;�r �- :,` . , ,-, - -,� ��A /1 560-3450 C�t o r��le � � �� _�___��_ 6431 UNNERSRY AVENUE NE rMEMO T0: City Council �� ' � ^NOKA COUNTY 29 January 1971 FROM: Marvin C. Brunsell, Acting City Manager FRIDLEY 21, MWNESOTA SUBJECT: Proposed Assessments on Lot 1, Block 2, Oakhill Addition Lot 1, Block 2, Oakhill Addition is located on 53rd Avenue Northeast. The property is served by water and sewer main lines rather than the small lateral lines that they use in the majority of the areas. City ordinances provide that when someone connects onto a main line an equivalent lateral charge be made which would put the property on the same basis as all other property in the City. I The charge quoted to the owners of the property in question was quoted on , the basic formula used for all other properties in the City of Fridley. That is, they have the option of using a rate which is the same as the rate used in adjoining streets in their area, plus interest from the date the project went in, or the average rate for laterals installed in the City of Fridley , during the last year. The property owner is given the benefit of which ever rate is less. , This property is different thar� the normal case, in that the assessment should have been levie� in 1959 rather than at this time. The church feels that if it had been levied in 1959 they would not haye been charged the additional ' interest, which is true. They have had the use of their money in the interim but of course they do not look at it this way. , This is a pending assessment, and it has not been levied at this time. The church apparently would like a council decision on the matter at this time so they know what the charge will be. As I stated the formula used is the same formula as is used in all other properties of the City except that there was ' an error on the part of the City in 1959 in not putting the charge on at that time. ' �_J ' r .. � � , � �J LJ �] I ' I ' I � _— � � ' , , � 0 St. Timotliy Church Parsonage - 649 -�3rd Avenue l�Jortheast Lot 1, 31 ock 2, Oa!<�ii 1 1 �'�ddi t i on St. Timothy's ol�tained a�vater and sewer permit in 195;s which must not have been checl:ed for laterals at that time. When we were asked for a search on this prop�rty in 1970, we discovered the fact that no lateral charges had ever been made on this property. For this reason ure listed a pending assessnent �or a�ater and sewer laterals on the fo1lo��ri ng basi s: New Rate -;�2 rror.t feet x j17.29 per foot =$1,590.6�. l-le did not use this figure as oid rate is much lessa Oid Rate - Used in 1��7 vahen Lot 2, D1ock 2, Oak Hill �ddition, adjoining lot, was ass�ssed by City: � Sewer Service ��o��o��o��o�o��• Sewer Lateral -$.73 per foot x 92 feet = ��A $ 163.51 + 67.16 230.67 � x .05 Interest �11.53 x �1�3 �+ears 1 9.�9 — Sewer Lateral and Service Charc�e -- $ 230.67 Interest -- 149.�9 3 0.5 Water SC'1'V1C2 •��• �$ ��7't Water Lateral - j.80 per foot x �2 feet = + 73.6r� 25-�.3 x .05 Interest � 12.72 - x 13 ,years 1 5.35 Water Lateral and Service Charge -- $ 25i�.34 Interest -- �b5.36 19.70 . TOTAL- !Jr,TE� � SE:•!�� $ °00.26 � �� J , ' ' , ' Januatcy 22, 1971 C,�iy Counc,i.e C�i.�y a � �'�u.d,�ey, M.t.nne� o�a Ger�emen: St. 11t�thy's L.uth� Chur�ch ttJ-N. �!. Sbt A��w Mi�/�ii� 21. Mi�■MO1a ' LUe ane �.n �he pnac�s.� o� camp.2e,te,i.n.g .ihe �sa.2e a� owc pa�onage cr,i 649 53nd Ave. N. �. ��r-i.d2ey. Lega,e de.� ch,i.p�,i,on: La� (1) , B.�och ( 2), �aFzh,i.eQ addi�i.on. Th,i,�b pnope�r.iy ,c.s awned by S�. T.imo�hy'd Lu�he�r.an Chunch. ' ' ' I � , , Gle have been .in�ojrmed �hcr.t �he aabe�s�smewt�s agcci.n�� xhe pnope�ty wh,i.ch had been �nev�.ou�s.�y .P,c:e�ed aa unde�c $100 a�c.e now $�00.26. Th,i� waa due �o a m.i,a�afie made by �h.e C.i�y a� ��r,c:d.Eey �.n 1959 �.n na� a�beaa�.ng �he �nope�r,ty when wa.teJc and delveh �selc.v�.ce� we�ce hoofzed up �o �he �a�onage. An a.Sdebdme.n.t a� $485.01 �suppo.beciey wad �a have been made a,i �h.cit �une �on wa,ielc and �sewe�. .�n.��ed .c:vi. �he wcea �.n 195�. The add��ona,� cha�cge a� $315.25 .i.S �o ccve�c �% �.wtehe4� ch.ah.ge�5 d�,nce 1957. wh.i.ee we be,�c:e�e �-he aa�sea�smervt ,i�s �cwr., we �eeX. �hcLt we �shou,ed no� be pev�a.�i.zed �he $315.25 San a m.v,�ahe made by �h.e C-i�y o� ��cc:d.�ey. (�e wande�c why �he a�s�,e�s�smev�t waa na� made �.n 1957 when �he wcr.tvc and Qewe�e we�ee pc�,t .�n. In addifi,�.on n6 mevitc:an wa,b made o� any ou�s�ancli.ng cv5ae�5bmen.tb by �'he C�ty a� �r�,�dQey when we pw�.eha,�ed �he pnopetr�y tin May 1959. The abave �.n�anma�i,an wa� di,a eu�s� ed w.i th M�c. Bnu,vi.a 2Q,e wha nev�,ewed owc d.i.#.ucLti.an a.nd �.v�d�ccr.ted �h.cr.t we wou.Pd be �ceqe�,i�ed t�� .�.�u t1�� u.6�5e��5men� a�( $485.01 p.�ua the rr6PhV�CCC� change" O�j $3��. "5. _ Gle wau,ed agjcee �� ay �l�.e on,i.g�.na.e adbe�sbmen.t o� $485.01 6►.�t �ee,e �he adcli.ti.ana.e ehcvcge -i.a a�encrX.�.ty. �ve nec�ue.�� .the cou.nei.� .to de.ee,te �he ehange.s added �o �he a�s�se�4men� e�.nee 1957. we wau,2d a,Qda .�i.fze �o blu:ng �o yowc a�iev�t,�.an �'hax .the �nope�r,iy .i.a now 6e,i.ng ' ne.tu�cned .to �'he �ax na.2.2,a o� Fh.i.d,�ey o� �fr,t.d,�ey wh,c;eh w,i,.Q.e ne.au.Pt �.n �u�.uce nevenue.� �o �'h.e C�i.ty. , , ' Thanf� you �on yocuc co►�,b�.de�ca,t,i,on o� �hi� ma.�eh.. StinceJc.e� y, Rev. Roben.t G. Ra�s.a �+oo n . . . . w�ucs dron.o . . . . rucv Mw. � .wn..�wrw.r � wr f..t- � �) ' ' � _ `/ � / ':`.:J��!`:�,T�`'lii)iti .:�(7. % % / � RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEM�NT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1970-3 ADDENDUM ��1 (Sidewalks) , . Jr% ' WHEREAS, Resolution No. 220-1970 adopted the 7th day of December, 1970 by the City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as speci- fically noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A", and 1 ' � WHEREAS, all of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed With the making of these improvements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten (10) days notice�by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property a-.mers heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice. NO�W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: � 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 220-1970 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible, to-wit: i�TTEST : 2. Sidewalk improvement including grading and other work located as follows: East Service Rd. of University Avenue: 57z Avenue to Mississippi Street � � y�<�� - That work to be performed under this project may be performed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids. 3. That Nasim M. Qureshi, City Engineer-Director of Planning, Fridley, Minnesota is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improve- ment. He shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. � ADOPTED BY T COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS , 1971. ' CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell � / DAY OF MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham , � ' ,�._�",.`,.*�i,ii1�Y��J�f� ��}. � �� ! RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL YLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMEITES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVII�NT PitOJECT ST. 1971-1 ADDENDUM �1 4 5�.� WHEREAS, Resolution No, 222-1970 adopted the 7th day of December, 1970 ' by the City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements, as speci- fically noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A", and ' � , WHEREAS, all of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of these improvements (as noted in said Notice) were given ten (10) days notice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property owners heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: ' 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 222-1970 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible, to-wit: ' � ' � �� ' , Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, water and san�itary sewer services, storm sewer and other facilities, located as follows: �� y: East River Road to East property line of Lot 4, Block 2, Pearson's lst Addition l�� Lincoln Street: 79th Way to South 150 feet East Service Rd, of East River Road: From South property line of Lot 5 to North property � line of Lot 2, Great Northern Industrial Center Plat, Outlot A 2. That work to be performed under this project may be performed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids. 3. That Nasim M. Qureshi, City Engineer-Director of Planning, Fridley, Minnesota is hereby designated as the Engineer- for this improve- ment. He shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. ' ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF — � � � ' ' L _� ' ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell THE CITY OF FRIDL�Y THIS 1971. / DAY OF MAYOR - Jack 0. Kirkham �`�;;;�>-:�,;�.� �, ^ ~ � � � �� - �! STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS � _i_?RiC7 r:0 5 2035 NO, LILAC DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. January 22, 1971 Nlr. Nasi.m M. Quershi City Ehgineer City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. �'ridley, Minnesota 55421 In reply refer to: 315 S.P. 0207-14 (T.H. 65=5) From W. Moore I,ake Drive to 63rd Avenue N.E. Zayout No. 1 Dear iQr. Quershi: Transmitted herecvith are the clerk's receipt, resolutions and Zayout No. 1 for the above referenced project within the corporate limits of Fridley. Layout No. 1 depicts the following features: 1. Signal installation at the T.H. 65 and Rice Creek Road - W. BQoore Lake Drive intersection. 2. E1'uninatior. of the left turn lanes and median opening at the T.H. 65 and 63� Avenue N.E, intersection. It is quite imperative that the T.H. 65 median opening at 63rd Avenue N.E. be closed if traffic signals are to be provi3ed at the main entr�.nce of the shopping center which is at the T.H. 65 and Rice Creek Road intersection. Kindly present Layout I�o. 1 for council approval at your earliest convenience. Should any questions arise, please feel free to cont�ct us. Sincerely� PT. R. Osterby District F�gineer $Y= . c d �� C. J. Hoffstedt Assistant District Preli.minary Desi�n F.ngineer EYlclosure: Layout No. 1 �� :I�- � , Form 2521 Rev. , � L�I� � ' � � i. R E S 0 L U T I 0 N �� 7/ At a(regular) (apecial) meeting of the City Council of the City of Fridley duly held on the day of _______, 19_, the follow- ing Resolution was offered by � + �econded by , ; to-wit: MIHEREAS the Comaaissioner of Highways has prepared preliminary plans for the improvement of a part of Trunk Highway Aiumber 5 renumbered aa Trunk Highway Nuniber 65 within the corporate limita of the City of Fridley from �� w• Moore I,ake Drive to 63rd �venue H.E. ; and Wi�RF.AS said prelimiaary plans are on file in the office of the Department of Iiighways, Saint Paul, Minnesota, being marked, labeled, and identiiied as Layout No. 1� S.P. 0207-14, (T.H. 65=5) �r� w. Yoore Lake � Drive to 63rd Avenue H.E. ; ' ' �' ' ' and WHF�2EAS copies of said preliminary plans as eo marked, labeled� and identified are also on fi�e in the office of the �„_ Clerk; and WHER�AS the term "said preliIDinary plan�" as hereinafter used in the body of thia resolution shall be deemed and intended to mean� refer to, and to incorporate the preliminary plans aa in the foregoing recitals particularly identified attd described; NOW� THEN� BE IT RESOLVr.D t�hat said pY`elim�*�Ary plazls foT the improvement of Trunk Highway Number 5 _ renumbered Trunk Fii.ghway ' Number F'S within the limits of the �ity of �''�'idley be and ' � hereby are approved. 6-�� ._• Form 2521 Rev. �l I Upon the call of the roll the following _ voted in favor of the Resolution The Yollowing voted egainst its adoption: whereupon the Mayor and preaiding officer declared the Resolution adopted. Dated , 19_• Attest STATE OF IrQNNF•SOTA ) COUNTY OF �s ) ss. ) Cif�_ UF h�idlq ) ' Mayor p Clerk I do hereby certify that at a regular meeting (at a apecial meeting of which due and legal notice was given) of the a1�,_ Council of Tti O � Mi.nnesota, on the !_ day ot _ ___ , 19`, at which a majority of the c�embers of said Couricil were present, the foregoing reaolution wa+s adopted. Given under �r hand and seal this ___ �Y �f - 19,�• Cit�► _ Clerk ' , � � i � ' � � 1 �1 ` . �. � RESOLUTION N0. ' / -1971 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS FOR WATER, SEWER, AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WHEREAS, it is necessary to acquire easements and right of ways for the construction of Water, Sewer, and Street Improvement Projects as listed below: 1. Water and Sanitary Sewer: S& W#93 a) A street and utility easement connecting Main Street and Osborne Road at Commerce Lane. b) A street and utility easement being the South Half of 77th Avenue East of the Railroad Tracks to the proposed Rancher's Road. c) A street and utility easement being the East Half of Main Street between 77th and 79th Avenue. d) A thirty foot utility and drainage easemen[ being the Easterly extension of 78th Avenue fram Main Street to Highway 47. e) A thirty-three foot street and utility easement being the North Half of 77th Avenue from Main Street to a point approximately 500 feet East of Main Street. f) A sixty foot street and utility easement being a strip of land � lying in a North, South direction approximatiey 460 feet East of Main Street between 77th Avenue and 79th Avenue. g) A twenty foot drainage and utility easement lying in a North, South direction located approximately 225 feet West of Highway 47 between 77th Avenue and 78th Avenue. h) A twenty foot drainage and utility easement lying in a North, South direction located approximately 100 feet West of Highway 47 between 78th Avenue and 79th Avenue. i) A thirty-three foot street and utility easement being the South Half of 79th Avenue between Main Street and Highway 47. 2. Street Improvement Project St. 1970-1: a) A street and utility easement described as: All that part of the following described area lying West of a line parallel with and distant respectively 115 feet East of the center line of the North bound lane of State Trunk Highway 4�65 : � -1- Resolution No. -1971 Additional Easements C:� Commencing at a point on the Easterly line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12 which point is 726 feet South From the Ncrth- east corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence running Westerly 1338.6 feet to a point on the West line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 12; thence running South along said West line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 12 a distance of 140 feet; thence running Easterly to a point on said Easterly line of said North- west 1/4 of said Section 12 which point is 140 feet South from the point of beginning; thence running North along the said Easterly line of said Northwest 1/4 of said Section 12 to the point of beginning of Section 12. All located in Section 12, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, b) A 10 foot street and utility easement described as the Easterly 10 feet of Outlot 2, Block 2, Fridley Industrial Park Plat 1. c) A 10 foot driveway easement described as being the Northerly 10 feet of Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 except the West 284 feet thereof, all lying in Section 12, T-30, R-24. 3. Street Improvement Project St. 1971-1 a) A street and utility easement described as follows: All that part of Lot 2, Block K, Riverview Heights Addition described as follows: Commencing a[ the Southeast corner of Lot 2, Block K, Riverview Heights Addition; thence Westerly along the South line of said Lot 2, a distance of 17 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point on the East line of said Lot 2 located 40 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Lot 2; thence Southerly along East line of said Lot 2 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 2 being the point of beginning; there terminating, lying in the S2 of Section 3, T-30, R-24. b) A street and utility easement described as being: All that part of Lot 43, Block K, Riverview Heights Addition described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 43, Block K, thence Easterly along the North line of said Lot 43 a distance of 10 feet; thence Southerly on a line parallel with the West line of said Lot 43 a distance of 15 feet; thence Northwesterly to a point on the West line of said Lot 43 located S feet South of the Northwest corner of said Lot 43; thence Northerly along said West line of Lot 43 to the point of beginning; there terminating, all lying in the SZ of Section 3, T-30, R-24. -2- i 1 � r � � � � � � i � , � � � , � Resolutioa No. -1971 Additional Easements c) A street and utility easement described as being: All that part of Lots 42 and 43, Block K, Riverview Heights Addition described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line 5 feet West of the South- east corner of said Lot 42; thence Northeasterly to a point that intersects a line parallel to and 10 feet East of the East line of said Lot 42; thence Southerly along a line parallel to and 10 feet East of the East line of Lot 42 to the South line of Lots 42 and 43; thence Westerly along the South line of Lot 43 to the point of beginning; there terminating, all lying in the SZ of Section 3, T-30, R-24. d) A street and utility easement described as being: All that part of Lot 1, Block 9, Spring Brook Park Addition described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 9; thence Northerly along the West Line of said Lot 1, Block 9, a distance of 20 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the South line located a distance of 30 feet from the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence Westerly along the South line of said Lot 1 to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1 being the point of begin- ning; there terminating, all lying in the S� of Section 3, T-30, R-24. e) A street and utility easement described as being: All that part of Lot 6, Block 9, Spring Broak Park Addition described as follows: ' Beginning at the most Easterly corner of Lot 6, Block 9, Spring Brook Park Addition, thence West along the South line of said Lot 6 a distance of 16 feet; thence Northeasterly to a point on the East line of said Lot 6 and located 12 feet from the South- east comer of said Lot 6; thence Southeast along the East line of said Lot 6 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 6 being the point of beginning; there terminating. f) A street and utility easement described as being: All that part of Lot 1, Block 1, Pearson's lst Addition described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence South along the East line of said Lot 1 twenty feet; thence along a line with a deflection angle to the right of 135° a distance of 21.21 feet; thence West parallel to the North line of said Lot 1 a distance of 195.5 feet; thence along a straight line to a point in the Westerly line of said Lot 1 located 72 feet Southeasterly of the Northwest corner of said Lot 1 as measured along said Westerly line; thence Northwest along the Westerly line of said Lot 1 to the Northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the North line of said Lot 1 -3- �� Resolution No. . -1971 � Additional Easements L_� � to the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 being the point of begin- ning; there terminating, all located in Section 3, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka. g) A str�et and utility easement descX3bed as being: All that part of Lot 1, Block 2, Pearson's lst Addition described � as follows; Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the North line of said Lot l twenty feet; thence Southwesterly to a point in the West line of said Lot l � located twenty feet South of the Northwest corner of said Lot l; thence North along the West line of said Lot 1 to the Northwest corner of said Lot 2 being the point of beginning; there ter- � minating, all located in Section 3, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. � � __ t �� i - 4. Street Improvement Project St. 1970-3 a) A street and utility easement described as being: That part of the South 180 feet of the West 18:i feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, T-30, R-24, described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, T-30, R-24, described as commencing at the Southwest corner thereof; thence North along the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the South- west Quarter 30 feet; thence East on a line parallel to the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 127.22 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence Northeasterly oa a tangential curve to the left haviug a radius of 20 feet a distance of 31.22 feet; thence North tangent to last described curve a distance of 100.96 feet; thence Northwesterly on a tan- gential curve to the left having a radius of 45.Q feet a distance of 31.99 feet to the North line of the South 180 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence East along the North line of said South 180 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to a point distant 183 feet East of the Wast line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 150 feet to a line parallel with and 30 feet North of the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence West along a line parallel with and 30 feet North of the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the actual point of beginning. Being a part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 59, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. b) A sidewalk easement described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter af :' Section 14, T-30, R-24 describPd as commencing at the Southwest corner thereof thence North along the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 30 feet; thence East on a line �, -4- - �� v � ' Resolution No. -1971 1 Additional Easements , i � � , �� parallel to the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 15 feet the actual point of beginning thence East along a line parallel with and 30 feet North of the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 112.22 feet thence Northeasterly on a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 20 feet to an intersection with a line 38 feet North of the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence West along said line parallel with and 38 feet North of the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to a point distant 57 feet East of the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Northwesterly to a point 30 feet East and 50 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwes[ Quarter thence West 15 feet along a line parallel to and 50 feet North of the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South to the actual point of begin- ning. Being a part of Lot 5, Auditor�s Subdivision No. 59, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. c) A street and utility easement described as follows: � That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, T-30, R-24 described as com�encing at the Southwest corner thereof; thence North along the West line of said South- east Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 30 feet; thence East � parallel with the South line of said Southeast Quarter of South- west Quarter a distance of 127.22 feet; thence Northeasterly on a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 20 feet a , distance of 31.22 feet said curve hereby will be described as curve 4k1; thence North tangent to curve 4�1 a distance of 100.96 feet; thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the left � having a radius of 45 feet a distance of 31.99 feet to the North line of the South 180 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the South- west Quarter said point being the actual point of beginning of , the tract to be described; said curve hereby described as curve #2 thence continuing Northwesterly along curve 4�2 a distance of 16.7 feet; thence Northwesterly tangent to curve ��2 a distance of 56.94 feet; thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the right 1 having a radius of 175 feet a distance of 53.5± feet to its intersection with a line parallel with and 30 feet East of the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter , said curve hereby described as curve �3; thence North along the said line parallel with and 30 feet East of the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 61.5±' feet to the intersection of a curve having a radius of 139 feet , and parallel with said curve �3; thence Southeasterly along said parallel curve with a radius of 139 feet a distance of 87.5 feet; thence Southeasterly tangent to the last described curve a distance � of 56.94 feet; thence Southeasterly on a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 81 feet and parallel with curve #2 to the intersection of the North line of the South 180 feet of said � Southeast Quarter of Southwest Quarter; thence West along said North line of the South 180 feet to the actual point of beginning, then te�►inates. Being a part of Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No, 59, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. �r .. , ' Resolution No. , Additional �asements � ' ' � lJ S � -1971 d) A street and utility easement described as follows: That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, T-30, R-24, described as comu►encing at the Southwest corner thereof; thence North along the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 30 feet; thence East parallel with the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 223.22 feet to the actual point of beginning of parcel to be described; thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve having a radius of 40 feet and a delta angle of 90° 00' a distance of 62.83 feet; thence South tangent to said described curve along the tangent of said curve 40 feet to the point of intersection of said curve thence East 40 feet back to the point of beginning there terminating. All located in Section 14, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. e) A street and utility easement described as follows: All that part of Lot 1, Block 4, Hamilton's Addition to Mechanics- ville described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot l, Block 4, Hamilton�s ' Addition to Mechanicsville; thence South along the East line of said Lot 1 a distance of 15 feet; thence Northwesterly to a point on the North line of said Lot 1 distance 25 feet West of the � Northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence East to the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 and there terminating. � ' � , f) A street and utility easewent described as follows: The Southerly 8 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 6, and all that part of Lot 4, Block 6, City View Addition described as follows: Co�encing at the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 6, City View Addition; thence West along the South line to the Southwest corner of said Lot 4; thence North on the West line of said Lot 4 a distance of 8 feet; thence Southeasterly to the Southeast corner of said Lot 4 and there terminating. g) A sidewalk easement described as being: All that part of Lot 30, Block 4, Hyde Pa�k Addition described 1 as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 30, Block 4, Hyde Park Addition; thence South along the West line of said Lot 30 a distance of 6 feet to the actual point of beginning of tract to.be described; thence East parallel with the North line ' af said Lot 30 a distance of 57.49 feet; thence on a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 45 feet to a line para�lel with and 11 feet South of the North line of said Lot 30; thence � West parallel Wj.th the North line of eaid Lot 30 to the West line of said Lot 30; thence North along the West line of said Lot 30 back to the point of beginning, there terminating. �►- , � � II iJ ' � CJ ' � �� ' Resolution No. -1971 Additional Easements h) A street and utility easement described as being: All that part of Lots 28, 29, and 30, Block 4, Hyde Park Addition described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 30, Block 4, Hyde Park Addition; thence South along the West line of said Lot 30 a distance of 6 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of said Lot 30 a distance of 57.49 feet; thence on a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 45 feet a distance of 69.53 feet; thence Southerly tangent to last described curve a distance of 60.20 feet; thence Southwesterly on a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 55 feet to its intersection with the South line of Lot 28 of said Block 4; thence East along the South line of said Lot 28 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 28; thence North along the Bast line of Lots 28, 29, and 30 of said Block 4 to the Northeast corner of Lot 30, Block 4, Hyde Park Addition; thence West along the North line of said Lot 30 to the Northwest corner of said Lot 30 being the actual point of beginning, there terminating. i) A street and utility easement described as being: All that part of Lot 25, Block 4, Hyde Park Addition that lies Northwesterly of the following described line: , Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 4, Hyde Park Addition; thence South along the Westerly line of Lots 1, 2, and 3 of said Block 4 a distance of 109.55 feet; thence on a ' tangential curve to the right having a radius of 95 feet a distance of 134.60 feet; thence Southwesterly tangent to last described curve a distance of 9.53 feet, thence on a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 80 feet to its intersection , with the West line of Lot 25, Block 4, Hyde Park Addition there terminating. ' , � , ' ' j) A street and utility easement described as follows: All that part of Lot l, Block 3, City View Addition, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3, City View Addition; thence North along the West line of said Lot l a distance of 25 feet; thence Southeasterly to a point on the South line of said Lot 1 distance 25 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence West along the South line of said Lot 1 to the Southwest corner of said Lot l, Block 3, City View Addition, there terminating. k) A street and utility easement described as follows: All that part of Lot 16, Block 1, Sylvan Hills Addition that lies Southeast of a line drawn from a point in the South line of said Lot 16 being fj5.1$ feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 16, as measured along the South line, to a point in the �� Resolution No. -1971 Additional �asetnents East line of said Lot 16 being 109.5 feet South of the North- east corner of said Lot 16, as measured along the East line of said Lot 16, and there terminating. 1) A street and utility easement described as being: Part of Lot 16, Block S, Hyde Park Addition m) A street and utility easement described as being: All of Lots 29 and 30, Block 12, Hyde Park Addition 5. Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Project 100 a) A drainage and utility easement described,as follows: The Westerly 30 feet of the Easterly 80 feet of the Southerly 370 feet of the Northerly 1120 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Section 12, T-30, R-24. b) A drainage and utility easement described as follows; The Westerly 30 feet of the Easterly 80 feet of the Noxtheast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, T-30, R-24, except the Northerly 1120 feet thereof. c) A drainage and utility easement described as follows: The Westerly 30 feet of the Easterly 80 feet of the North 330 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, T-30, R-24, except the South 25 feet dedicated for road ease- ment to the City of Fridley. WHEREAS, the City Council previously determined that the Project was feasible and necessary and has ordered in the improvement. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Fridley that: The City Administration, assisted by the City Attorney , is authorized to acquire the said rig�t of ways for the purposes of the improvements of public utilities and streets. ' ' , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that if the Administration is not able to acquire said right of ways upon terms agreeable to the City Council, that the City Attorney is hereby authorized to commence condemnation action in the Anoka District Court for the above described right of ways. -8- ^� �. i � , �� , � Resolution No. -1971 ' Additional Easements , ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, THIS DAY OF , 1971. � ' MAYOR - JACK 0. KIRKHAM ATTEST: � CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL , � ' � � � ' , ' . ' ' ' � �ls� P "� e �r /� �� 1 � r`1"� :: : f _�. ' rf 'J � �!" � r. i % � •'!/"i'-' , � i i ' � ! .s'/ r �: � , �:� �^�1�� _�• ��._ � . � �::, � �� s �.�I\ I� �� ' .� 11. PUBLIC HEALTH SANITARIAN OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, DECEMBER ACTIVITY REPORT• 1500 - 69th Avenue N.E, Court case and several rechecks. All demolition material and other debris removed. 5381-83 - 6th Street N.E. Litter complaint. Checked and talked to occupant. 151 Longfellow N.E. Waste drainage and litter. Several visits and letters. Problem corrected. 1631 Rice Creek Road Court case after additional complaints on waste drainage from house. Ordered to cease use of basement drain or connect to sewer. After several weetcs, another complaint recurred. Rechecked and has been used. Another complaint to be filed. 5370 - 5th Street N.E. Rechecked litter problem after violation tag issued on owner of property. 180 - 79th Way N.E. Rechecked installation of new hot water heater in apartment building after owner ordered to install one. 7699 Viron Road N.E, Made food establishment survey after complaint forwarded from State Health Department. Sent letter to owner. 7422 Able N.E. Recheck complaint on litter. Renter promised to�clean up since my previous letter to owaer did not get the job done. Did write another letter to owner. 5701 Iiighway ��65 and 5700 Polk Apartment complex - rechecked Litter problem after more complaints. Sent letter to new m�nagement. ' 6215 University Avenue N.E. Two surveys of food establishment after new application for license. Applicant made a number of physical improvemente and did a great deal of cleaning. Recommended approval of license. 150 - 592 Way N.E. Water seepage problem at apartment building. Sent letter to owner. Was corrected. 1136 - 73 2 Avenue N. E. Rechecked property and several Court appearances. Found guilty on three violation tags issued. 5207 Central Avenue N.E. Checked food operation and recommended approval of license. Skywood Shopping Center Checked outside litter problem with owner. Indicated willingness to clean up and maintain. �� i .+� r ! .1 144 Liberty Street N.ED Litter complaint. Checked and sent letter to clean up. 211 - 79th Way N.E. Litter complaint. Checked and sent letter to clean up. 6485 East River Road Checked location of ice vender at service station after request from owner of station. 122 - 632 Way N.E. Litter complaint. Checked and was already cleaned up. 6440 University Avenue N.E. Odor complaint. Checked and found no problem at time of visit. Sent letter to owner asking him to check with adjacent occupant. 6021 Main Street Rechecked complaint on litter. Has been corrected. 5980 - 2nd Street N.E, Rechecked litter complaint. Improved but only fair. No further action at this time. 7965 Riverview Terrace Recheck of litter complaint. Improved but only fair. 650 Ely N.E. Rechecked yard problem. No improvement. Sent another letter to owner. 591 Lafayette N.E. Rechecked litter complaint. No substantial improvement. Sent another letter. 4715 - 3rd Street N.E. Dog litter complaint. Checked and talked to owner. 7329 East River Road Food survey for new license applicant. Discussed survey with new applicant and also sent a written report. 5404 - 7th Street N.E. Recheck of triplex with Building Inspector. Owner was present. Substantial improvement. 5620 - 6th Street N.E. Heating complaint on duplex. Talked to owner over phone and sent a letter. 5770 - 2'� Street N.E. Litter complaint. Checked and sent letter to owner. 5516 and 5530 Regis Drive Rechecked two litter problems. Have been cleaned up. 280 - 57th Place N.E. Made food survey and discussed wi�h ��a�er. 250 - 57t� Avenue N E. ade`food survey of all food operations and all other areas. Required twc� visirti anci tw�� written repc�rt� ' � , 8255 East River Road Made survey and wrote report to Building Inspector at his request. Will require more follow-up. • , 5351 Central Avenue N.E. Made food survey and also checked all other areas. Have had a long history of complaints on dirty rest rooms. Sent written report to manager and ' discussed with him. 7519 Able N.E. � Litter complaint. Checked and talked to owaer. 6633 Arthur Street N.E. Recheck of plans and memo to Building Inspector. ' 25 - 44th Avenue N.E. Several air pollution complaints on particulate matter. Previously have ' received a black smoke and odor complaint. Discussed with Pollution Control Agency. All complaints being forwarded to Polltittion Control Agency. ' � ' � ' ' ' L' � ' , � ��, O�rDINANCE ND. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 3.03 OF THE CITY CODE The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Section 3.03 of the Fridley City Code is hereby amended to read as foZZows: 3.03. The following days shall be holidays, and no employees, except in the case of necessity to pvblic safety, health and welfare, or unless the require- ments of his employment so provide, sha11 be obZiged to perform work on such day; and when so performed, compensation for such work shall be paid as overtime work at the rate of one and one-half (.I�) times the regular pay. The following days are "holidays", New Year's Day, January 1; Washington's and Lincoln's Birthday, the third Monday in February; Memorial Day, the last Monday in May; Independence Day, July 4; Labor Uay, the first Monday in September; Christopher CoZumbus Day, the second Monday in October; Veterans Day, the fourth Monday in October; Thanksgiving D�ay, the fourth Thursday in November; and Christmas Day, December 25; provided, when New Year's Day, January 1; or Independence Day, Ju1y 4; or Christmas Day, December 25; fa11s on Sunday, the foZlowing day shall be a holiday and, provided, when New Year's Day, January 1; or Independence Day, Ju1y 4; or Christmas Day, December 25; falls on Saturday, the preceding day sha11 be a Holiday. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF ,1971. Mayor - Jack O. Kirkham ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell First Reading:__��1 � L �I Second Reading: Publish...... ryri / ! � � ' �� . , C L A I M S GENERAL ��24220 - ��24370 LIQUOR �� 5235 - �k 5284 , � LIST OF CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL AT THE MEETING ' OF FEBRUA.RY 1 19 71 GENERAL CONTRACTOR APPROVED BY 1 itoyal Improvement Company 526-6th Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Basil Thayer Bldg. Insp. ' SIGN ERECTOR 1 Conrtnander Board Minnesota, Inc. 56-1st 5treet S.E. New Brighton, Minnesota By: R. M. Z�cker Bldg. Insp. � Macey Signs, Inc. 451 Wilson Street N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota By; R. M. Ruvelson Bldg. Insp. ' IiEATING ' Snelling Company 1400 Concordia Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 By; Willard Kunhie Jr. Plbg. Insp. 1 Healy Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 655 West County Road E St. Paul, Minnesota B�t: John A. Healy Plbg. Insp. 1 GAS SERVICES ' Healy Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 655 West County Road E St. Paul, Minnesota By; John A. Healy Plbg. Insp. ' ' ' � ' , i %�`' � ESTIMATES FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL - FEBRUARY 1, 1971 Unsco, Inc. 3307 Highway No. 100 North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 FINAL Estimate No. 3 for construction o� Water Improvement PXOject ��94 (Well House �k2), according to contract Comstock & Davis, Inc. ' Consulting Engineers 1446 coanty xoaa ��J'� � Minneapolis, Minnesota PARTIAL Estimate No. 16 for staking out of construction work for Water I�provement Project Number 94 from January 4 through January 16, 1971 PARTIAL Estimate No. 2 for furnishing of engineering services for Water Improvement Project No. 94 �C� I $ 2,951.56 $ 42.24 $ 148.38 ' , �� t ' � ' I � , Ij' 3 f ! C�T�:� Ati u?C a�.� b��.S s Tsl� . (:!3r3�.3��;.�h$ LY�.'��.i3atii � 1[�4b �t:��J �e::�.l t�Joo 2��a;�»��"•.s, '�,�.ru:��o�.� 5�'a3:? J: ��a?`t� 19, ? � � �. �.SA6.�7 ��..-.�..t'?.c:�4yl� ° L�.Lj u�.,,t�::�`:F'iJ. c�� i�o r?w��.�3 c{:��R;�.��.y ��r� �r��^:;.��::� c � �y u{ ��; a �' �� 6�s y�. T3�� :t.��.�� .�-?�w:� r, ��loLo r�.?.Y1i's+'eb3�2��.�6:+y F�_iz::a'?�::�'S:a`l. �L.ld^.,� {�i�.' � � }.c4; ".�?2 : C�.r`�.'«d.' Ei TC�� A. Q�' i�:?:�:5�l.2ti'::?a� We �z��}� ::4�swLs' � �� '� °�� .� 2`.� o � �l�v •�:i� �� .4 �,, io� �7�:��0, �� e , ?3J3 E7.d1�, ��rJA /.?�, • 8�L g � h7.. H !'I e-.ns-� H.� a si��w 9 SYS7".^'-•v�i aa � J��J..�� A iJ V b.4�i. Wii'iL''�}�W Lfi:�, �Sg�A7 RY '7 l:OL i.l� �'.:�;.�:_.-..0 ,� � T-1� * �C.�2�'�.'� ��P: �F.`?'n� ^bw'?3"e'.a.�:��"�13� L^i� �7t1'e,€?�' .Y�.�yDiGii:�:.'�I1-°'•':3�°'i. ��£�'i l`G�J'=i �si��1 TiTii'..�`c3£3�t3 �`�d8 SS:4.,'OA'�i�E�� gEi E'.�13�.`.°.a.:i:e C{��'��'.�'�� :� S�i `?":.�.�v �t.,p+,{ I�pf �9 � tlI�q t �'�:�h.�'iL�� li �dl:l� �C :.4 �'i'��?.�i�s�.1��.� 170�re .i�,I�$ ��..'r:,,�'.�y f.�i� Ae�`� �.' �., a� A�+ g� :i F��a� ��e�:� �'�� uft:-e.'i �:;3�c�v{��':�'i�.t3 �et3%: y �P�'.aP��''�,1�3 Lu^-�.'."�s'��`;t,:`:+°s $].A,�o1�.0a 552e�3 .S�OJ 9 (3v' V e J � � E€s ��.-�� ;-� tZa e 1 S� y 6�a: , t.3 ��;3.f��:e ri�. 2 24��.a�� TO�a�l. T'�'�:`.:�,a��s �. �, 9�� :� �903.2�. �x+D%�� L3S�;�7 �i��'s e . a o o . . a . . a e . . . . . s e . . . . . . e $ 7. 9 953..55 bc�'.�3 �s�'°i.�3c? 'Jy��•r:P'�� t:�el�^,. t.`e��it l:�C�i:ri 6.'c��"acd �::a+� f 33,".i' �s.'h�.� E.�'3� fi::itt�.. �.F LSe:�3if?ai�3�.�3.�'y�' C�d'�.l�.11�e...�-.. � �+_;ej�J�i{�a'�..�;:i3�d�'° TJ..bdi 4,.Sc^' f,:v�':3ax'��.: t4..�iyF?:w"°.:�i:.�, e �'�a�. n�;�++�',�:2'r:?:.�..� �.id.'3� �•£`t� ��'�.1�. Y: z�?�'i :v`i3 � � �' �"' "�"�'. �"'.s..'^*�..'�i ii �i.. ,�."ri"+P:iz �x�`..�. %+� �'�' a; i �i�i'16.°S r`i3 a.r= .�i..`�i??i5'� s c^.a'�i� ��i33`�C �� -s��. va"1. > y��x ��a��a::��•�^38 �.:�t �;:��.;�..�� Lc�cl �c^�,�:�� ca� :Fa� �?W��: a:�a��:3 �i�=r�. ��p�� cc: iTx�aco, Ira�. �e�^�>saa� � � �a-:�;��d��9 CiVA�� S.��ei t'.9 Lt� °�I t.e'�a � .:.�� e . ,'nA:�' � � `� _ '✓ �;�:":;'.-�� U"�/' '.--i B� ��7y n -_ � � . ---- � .�..� EO Y s �I`JL:tJ1bC�iEr}GD^j�.7 stw o �� , ' � � January 5, 1971 • ��,,,�� o,,,"� .....� ,•. . . �� ` ._..._` _j ��'L..�.-,,,..� ,i�� .�rr� ri ��\'��r;�a�' %R.,sb.' STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ' Mr. Nasim M. Qureshi ' City Engineer 61+31 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55�1 CISTRICT NO. 5 2055 NO. LILAC DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS, iViiNN. In Reply Refer To: 315 C.S. OzoS (T.H. 1+7=156) City of Fridley Resolution No. 216-1970 Request for Advanced TOPICS Project Dear Mr. Qureshi: We have made a preliminary review of your request for an advanc�d TOPICS project and have discussed it informally with representatives of the Federal Highway Administration (FHNTA). The FH4J'A does not consider it to be appropriate to agprove another advanced project in Anoka County since the priorities for the entire A,noka County TOPICS Program will probably bz established this spring. They also have some reservations as to whether the detachm.ent of frontage roads, which is the bulk of this project, comprise a valid TOPIC� project. It appears that the project would most likely not be approved for TOPICS funds and even if it should, it would have to be scheduled in its proper priority with other TOPICS projects in Anoka County. In view of your interest in expediting this project, it is reconunended that it not be pursued for TOPICS funding. Have you reached a d�cision as to whether you intend to prepaxe the construction plans for these detachments? As I rr�ntioned earlier, we would not be able to begin design on this project until early spring. Preparation of the plar:s by Fridley would expedite the letting of the project. Please advise me of your decision. Sincerely, N. R. Osterby District Engineer � ,. � j ��' / '�w�,,�% �� By: Patrick B. Mu.rNl-i�r � District State Aid Engineer f• 8� �AW OFFICES HALL. SMITH, cTU�TER, FEIBEMA Bt HASHVITZ CHARTEREO WVMAN SMITH LEONARD T. JUSTER HENqY H. FEII(EMA RONAID L. HASKVITZ JAMES R. CASSERLY CARL J. NEWOUIST DOUGLAS MALL OFCOUNSEL � January 22, 1971 Mr. Marvin Brunsell Acting City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University AVe. N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Dear Marvin: SU�TE 1050 BUILDEi�3 E7tCHANGE SUILDING MINNEAGOIIS.MINNE50TA SS�02 O«�C[5 IN�. iRrOIE� 6 OSSEO .wc� cooc •�z TELEPHONE 33�-iaB� On Thursday evening, January 21st, at a6out 5:30 p.m., I had a flat tire of East River Road, just after I had passed under the 694 viaduct. I am writing this letter just to record the good feeling I F�ad when the Frid- ley police car came along and gave me help. Officer Tom Sauer was able to communicate with Triple A to get a wrecker to come. He kept his lights flashing so that the busy traffic didn't run into me. He was most cour- teous and helpful. I just thougF�t that the City might like to receive some happy letters to �ielp 6alance the complaints that come in. Yours truly, �— . Wyman Smith WS/vn cc. Chief McCarthy Fridley City Hall 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55421 O �� , �� FIRE DL'PART�1IiV'I' RI:POR'I' FOR DECE�iGF:R 1970 , Fire alarms January ttirougli Decer.ibcr 20, 19G9 ..... 403 ' Fire alarms Ja�ivary tlirotz�h December 17, 19"/0 :::;; 3�13 Decrea�e iil ala�ms t}Iis year. 60 � Fire alarms for DecemUer 19Z0 ::::: 27 Fire alarms for December 1969 15 Increase in alarSns in December. 12 , � � I ' �_ , � ' � � , ' ALARI�IS Autos � Trucks 7 Rescue 4� Furnaces 2 Houses 2 Rekindle 1 Appliances 2 Incinerators 1 Sheds 2 Commercial 1 Indus�rial 2 Trash 2 False 1 Total ...... 27 TYPES OF ALAR�IS � AVER�GE RESPO\SE � �eneral Alarms ..... 22 avera�e response ... 17.13 Company Alarms ..... 1 average response ... 17.00 Still Alarms ..... 4 averade response ... 2.75 The total loss from fire and smoke damage for the month of December was less than $ 1,000.00. One alarm was answered in the Village of Hilltop It was a trash container be;�i.nd the Snyder Drug Store. The t�ao shed fires were an old horse barn, on the� Geggie propert;,.located on 69th Ave. East of Central Ave. The fires �aere set by unknoc�;n juveniles. Tiiree drills iaere held duri��g the month with an average.attendance of 20.33. The regular meeting of the department was held Thursday December 3rd with 29 members in attendance. ' A1.1 commercial, industrial and appartment properties in the Vi2lage of Hilltop, were inspected this month, and they were billed for the sa,7�e. Durl Smitil and Gary Th�mpson were approved for menbership on the department. They were instructed to arrange to take a pl�ysical exami.nation. Upon receipt of the results of the physical, and the Doctors statenient, that they �,�ould be able to meet the rec�uirements of the fire service, they will be on active duty. MEETINGS ATTE�TnED: Metro Paid Fire Chiefs , Respectfully yours, /� , „ �� =-4 �`!''' � • �fi'�- � �'! Robert S. Elu�lles / Chief v . i F-� � F--' F--� F--' N F-+ F-�' F--' F--� V--� V--� 1--' � ' N N N N N N N N N N � N N N F-+ F-� F--+ 1--� t-+ F-+ H.+ �, � �' � � � � � � � \ \ \ N N IV N N N N N �'J� RS . N N N F-' � F-� F--� F� N �--� F-.+ �, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ b� N. �-+ � F-' O t0 CO t0 A W W N h-� CO CJ CO CA C!i �A W N ^i � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � m v � v � � � v v � v � � � � v � � v � � ,o ° o o_ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 1-� 1--� N F-� H-+ F-+ F--� F--+ 1--� N H� F-' l--� F-� � CJ� W O � W h-� -P � 1� f--� tD �l F--� U"i N tD F--+ -P � �t � N �P J� �P O W N� � O W CJ� � -P O �-' t-+ W N W h-� — �P , W -P O� Oo O� V Oo Cn O� A tJt W Oo O� �P O� O Vt CO 3 m a b �v a b � � b �v n �o � �v � n b � � a n .-�- .-�- ..�-� � � .-� .-�- .-� � .7-a � .�.�' .-�- �. .�.- � � .-�-, ..� ..�- (/i VI � r� �l i!1 (J'1 iJ"I 01 V (�+i (!1 .-� � A (J1 � '"j (n 1--'' . •�-+ -P co o � o0 0o cv co o �3 � � N• oo w c� co �-r u, N � C7 � O� N -P X N � ' 00 �' � �' �i � r--� �' �' n l0 O � cU W P� . tn c� � m w Y � � � m .� � � � � � � w � < a� w x � i� � ' N o � � � c-�+ rN-r < � N� NN � cN-r � p�q c-�r cn � �:S c-�r `� �-�r N cVr, (�D � O � � C/� C/� � O �� ' �' cn �' O A� ¢� c+ p �h • U1 CJ� � CD �-�t (/� rh � y �' A � c�n c-�r �' � � `+ :-r cn (� rt cn ¢. •, c+ c o y � � o • ' n o4 • �+ n • . � CD (D 7� Z Z � � (D O Z � �P Z Z < O� � � O z �'+ � � [r] [rJ 7 • . . . ' Z tn � � � . . � � ~' � � a. m �" cn ��-r � z � �, � ` rr o tn Y .c� < fn < (D � O � � �' • � � ' ' � r• Cl. < H � a7 n � z cn � w v � x n H � y � v � v � � w w o m c� o � w � s� o o � � � � C m � a v, �3 m 7-' r-n �i �i c+ � � a �i c-r c-r c-+ cn c-r � � � � � � N• w � � o �n v� � � � o 0 0 � o m v, m c� � � w cp cu c� cn w i � � �i � m a. � c�i � m � � o F'' �'. cp �,. �,. y '►� w w `""' �' � � o � [D— _ _ i c+ m A .- H O f ' C�i � � 3 N. � R �i O� O� Q� O� O� O� O� Q� O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O� O� d� C� O� C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a rn o rn � u, � o� rn o� o� o� rn o� rn rn rn v, rn u, rn i i i i i i i i i i i � O� Q� p� O� O� � O� O� O� O� Vf O O O O � O O O O � O � O O V V V V V �i v V Q� � � cn � � � cn � cn m c� .-, c�r rn rn o� r+ rn r+ �, o �• o 0 o N• o r• -o cn n � v, cn cn � -P � o o � � � � � 2 � �..� N � � � V � � � , v F-+ h-, 1--� N F-� �P tn W O W F-+ N -P -P tn � W Oo � Cn O O CO a -� b n � n � � � � � � F-� F-+ F-+ F--� h-� N F-� F-� F-J h� �A J� .P F-, t0 V H+ U'7 N CO F-• �i F-+ V L W (n O W Cn � �P � r--� � � N W N N 0 o co � � co � � oo � o � cn � m Z� -o b � b -� b �v a b n b a v'° G � � � � � � � x� I � � � � � � n. ' m . ✓ . o F-+ F-� 1--+ F-, �-+• N F-� �--� N F--� f-+ h-� F-+� V--� h-� �--� F--+ . � N W C� V W V �P �1 O � l0 W �P W V l0 Cn O O � '►7 ' Z m � z V � � I � � . � 1 �"� I N ! ~ � �'a � N l ~ � ' � � CD � OO � v � O� � (l� � �P I W ( N_ . � F-� � O � 1 Ir � � c � i C7 tr7 n � � to tn � � � v O > ` : � � � � � � � N N N N N N N '• \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1�7� W N N N N N N 3' F-J CO l0 V O� W N -^{ � � � � � � � m V V V V V V V O O O O O O O f-' N O F-' F-' /-' V Q O O� W l0 V � F-' W C!t W �A C!� �P O � Cn Oo -P N O � m �v � � ro -d �v v � � � � � � � 00 � cn x rn � o o �v cfl r• � � � � � � � � � � o rn � �-r � m x i o � .cn b � � �s ;� w � `� IV f-'• � �'S c�n � N� � N H � r c+ o cn `G r� �n � o 0 0 �-+ a cn � o�a �' D � � � N• � r � z �' � � o m in o �• z . . � z � �' < cn • rn • ' � � � � � m � � � o <° � � � o o 'p co �' �' � ^' N � -n D � � P j � � � � � �' � � � C 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z a� rn rn v cn rn rn ° i i i --1 rn rn rn � 0 0 0 V V O � � f•'! Q� � N o ro u� cn o � � �• o � �' z .� � h-' N O ~-' h-' F-� V O f--� O� W t0 V z � w o � � cn .P v, w rn w � rn u, �--� m b -o n b �v a v � � � � � � � :� � c, m � O H' N � F-+ F� 1-� 1--� p� N N � W O� W � '�1 � m � x ,� � � �--� � � z — �P W N r-� O C� Oo 07� • m 1� Ir � IZ . N 0 D --i m t7 m n rn � to tr: :z1 F--� CO V O � I.. _. F I RE Pf,EVC��;-f� I Ofd Summary of Activities Th i s h�onth 6uildings Inspccted _192 Reinspcc.tions 26 Inspections other than 61��, 7 Burning Permits R�qu�st�d 0 By Inspector 0 By Others 0 �pecial Pern�its 0 Total 225 Th i s �'^ntl� L�st Ycar 3� 9 Lf 13 8 1 58 December 1970 Tot�l 500 157 75 23 16 3 12 761 , Orders Issued 38 7 135 Orders Completed 18 9 84 Illegal Equipment 0 � 0 � Written 4Jarnings 3$ �2 143 Verba i t�la rn i ngs 16 14 17LE Conplsints 2 0 46 Fire Investig�tions 6 0 34 Extra Activities: Safety Semin�r at Fridley Convalescent Hor,e Emergency Care Seminar Plannin, Comrnission Sehool Fire Prevention Pro�ram In Service �'r�ining for Teachers at Retarded Chiluren Center, St. 41i11iam's Ch��rch Trainin� Session at Spring Lake Park Fire Department . $peal;er at Lions CIuL hte�ting Lahiaur Inc. - Fire Brigad� Training , Pl an checks on nc�� cons t ruct i on . Cro4�ld supervision at Columbia Arena � 62 hours Not^: 29 of the bui ldinc,, inspections 4;;.re for the Fli l ltc� Vi 11�� as p°r cor�tract. � ' . ' Summa ry of F i re A 1� rn�s � , F I RE F'�EVEN"I� I OPd Th i s Montti ' Residenti�l 1 � hon Reside.ntial 0 � Commercial 1 ' Industrial 1 Grass & Brush 0 ' lst �1id & Rescue 4 Auto & Truck 6 ' False 1 ' Honest htistake 1 Miscellaneous 9 , - Storage 2 � Mutual Aid 0 Hilltop T ' Total . 27 ' Response: 27 Alarms � G°neral Alarms 22 360 men , Still Fllari��s 4 11 men Compan;� �larms 1 l7 men Death F Injuries fror� Fi re ' Firemen Civilians ' Losses for rr,onth of Decemb�r Buildings $125.00 ' Tot�l Losses for Ycar ' Buildirigs $29,0�0.00 Th i s P1o:� ` h Last Ye�r 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 1 7 16.3 men/call 2.75 men/call 17 men/call Injuries 0 Decemb�r 1970 Tot�l 33 3 5 4 72 29 73 8 21 86 10 3 10 357 Deaths 0 Contents $250.00 Ccsnt�nts $104,625.00. Total for Year 1 injury 4 injuries Auto & Truck $400.00 Auto & Truck $4,49�f.00 �., . 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY MONTHLY REPORT - DECEMBER 1970 STREET DEPARTi�1ENT HOURS 1. Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 . Crackf i 11 ing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 3 . Grave 1 Haul ing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 4. Miscellaneous Street Work . . . . . . . . . . . 4082 5. Patching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 6. Shop Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289� 7. Signs and Barricades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199� 8. Equipment Repairs - Street . . . . . . . . . . . 4182 WATER DEPARTMENT 1. Filtration Plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231� 2. Final Readings and Collections . . . . . . . . . 46 3. Hydrant Repairs and Flushing . . . . . . . . . . 75 4. Miscellaneous Water Work . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 5. Pumphouse Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 6. Standpipe Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10� 7. Valve Inspections and Repairs . . . . . . . . . 14 8. Water and Sewer Inspections . . . . . . . . . . 6 9. Water Meter Inspections'and Repairs ...... 57 L0. Water Turn-ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12� 11. Watermain Breaks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1612 12. Watermain Taps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 13. Equipment Repairs - Water . . . . . . . . . . . 40Z SEWER DEPARTMENT 1. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs ...... 2. Manhole Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Miscellaneous Sewer Work . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Sanitary Sewer Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. Sanitary Sewer Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . 6. Equipment Repairs - Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . STORM SEWER DEPARTMENT 1. Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work . . . . . . . . . SNOW and ICE CONTROL 1. Miscellaneous Snow and Ice Work . . . . . . . . 2. Sanding - Ice Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Snow Plowing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. Equipment Repairs -•$now and Ice � � , . . . . . � 210 26 1232 216 Z 602 55 0 83 119 174 91 Page 1�ao PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - DECEMBER 1970 MISCELLANEOUS HOURS 1. Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2. Engineering Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Fire Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4. Holidays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352 5. Locke Lake Dam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. Park Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5g Z 7 . S ick Leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 8. Vacations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 9. Water School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 10. Weekend Duty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 11. Equipment Repairs - Engineering . . . . . . . . $�. 12. Equipment Repairs - Fire Department ...... 182 13. Equipment Repairs - Liquor Stores . . . . . . . 3 14. Equipment Repairs - Park Department ...... 412 15. Equipment Repairs - Police Department ..... 88 ' � ' � � ' � � � � � ' , � � � , ' 1 I STREET DEPARTMENT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF FRIDLEY YEARLY REPORT FOR 197� HOURS Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 797 � Crackfilling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460'� Curbing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 Grading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 Gravel hauling and Surfacing . . . . . . . . . . 454 Miscellaneous Street Work . . . . . . . . . . . 3,508-3/4 Patching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 009 Shop Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1, 952� Signs, Barricades and School Crossings ..... 1,180 Stabilizing with Chloride . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Equipment Repairs - Street . . . . . . . . . . . 2,994-3/4 WATER DEPARTMENT 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. �o. 11. 12. 13 . Filtration Plant Operations . . . . . . . . . . 3,045� Final Readings and Collections . . . . . . . . . 736� Hydrant Repairs and Flushing . . . . . . . . . . 683 Miscellaneous Water Work . . . . . . . . . . . . 802 Pumphouse Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1, 334 Standpipe Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212'� Valve Inspections and Repairs . . . . . . . . . 382 Water and Sewer Inspections . . . . . . . . . . 115 Water Meter Inspections and Repairs ...... 675� Water Turn-ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175'� Watermain Breaks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,157� Watermain Taps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Equipment Repairs - Water . . . . . . . . . . . 485 SEWER DEPARTMENT 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. Lift Station Inspections and Repairs ,..... 1,808� Manhole Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 Miscellaneous Sewer Work . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,191� Sanitary Sewer Breaks . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Sanitary S,ewer Cleaning . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,886 Sanitary Sewer Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . 321 Equipment Repairs - Sewer . . . . . . . . . . . 705� STORM SEWER DEPARTMENT 1. Catch Basin and Storm Sewer Cleaning ...... 867� 2. Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Work . . . . . . . . . 448 ' ' ' � ' � i � � � � � � ' � � � r Page Two PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT YEARLY REPORT FOR 197Q SNOW and ICE CONTROL HOURS 1. Miscellaneous Snow and Ice Work ........ 427 2. Sanding - Ice Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377 3. Snow Plowing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 452'� 4. Equipment Repairs - Snow and Ice . . . . . . . . 430 �IISCELLANEOUS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. �0. 11. 12 . 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24 . 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34 . 35. 36. Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Civil Defense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Cleanup - Earth Day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Engineering Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114'� Fire Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' 77 Fire Department School . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Flood Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Funerals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Holidays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,840 Injury on Job - Robert Anderson . . . . . . . . 600 Injury on Job - Richard Bloom . . . . . . . . . 28 Injury on Job - Chester Swanson . . . . . . . . 384 Labor Meetings . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 4 Liquor Stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 Locke Lake Dam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Park Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511'� Police Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7'� Project St. 1970-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105� Project St. 1970-4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Project St. 1970-9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275� Project W95-B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 Safety School 24 Sewer Department School . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Sick Leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 913� SweeperSchool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Vacations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,773 Voting Booths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 Water Department School . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Weekend Duty . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218'� Equipment Repairs - Administration . . . . . . . 15 Equipment Repairs - Civil Defense . . . . . . . 4 Equipment Repairs - Engineering . . . . . . . . 153 Equipment Repairs - Fire Department . . . . . . 163� Equipment Repairs - Liquor Stores . . . . . . . 40 Equipment Repairs - Park Department . . . . . . 582 Equipment Repairs - Police Department ..... 979 i I , I , I , ' I , Ii- I , I � I , . I , I � Il lt I � ' � ' � , B-79 ( a E V. 11-3-64 ) (Standard Form of the International Association oF Chiefs oF Police) (Copies availoble at Federal Bureau of (nvestigation, Washington, D. C. 20535) CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT c�tY �,f _ Fridley ___ n,��,�t� af _ Deceraber , �970 TABLE 1.--DISTRIBUTION OF :'ERSONNEL Average Doily Percent Daily Average Daily Numerical Strengrh Absence Absence Temporory Details Average Effective $trength End of �ame month Sarn� mont}: Same month SamF month Same month this mont}� Inst ycar 'I��his month last ya•ar This rnonth last year This monit last year '7'his month Last month last year ��ot�,� ��«��,�,,,�. 27 27 9.47 8.50 _ .80 .53 3•69 3•5� Chi�f's offic�� . _ � � Fi�cords burc��u . . � __ � __-- — UnlfotTnc�d forc-c� . �� — Ue�tectivo buicnu � � Trafflc bur�au . . _ , -- First rellef . . . , �� Second rellef . , �O �O Third relief . . . � � TABLE 2.--CHANGES IN PERSONNEL TABLE 3.--DAILY AVERAGE PATROL STRENGTH 1. � Present for duty end of last month .......... 2! Same month This month last year 2. Recrultc�d durir.q month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Helnstated durinq month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � �� 1. Total number of patrolmen . . . . . . . . . �� `� Total to uccount for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7..� Less per�nanent assiqnments (publlc �offices, clerlcal, chauffeurs, etc.) . . . 4. Separatlons from the servlr.e: 3. Less detalls to speclal squads or bu-- � reaus (ttaffic, vice, park, etc.) . . . . . (a) Voluntary resiqnatlon . . . . . . � 4. Avetaqe dalIy absences of patrolmen (b) Retirement on pen;lon ..... asslqned to patrol duty owinq to: - ' (a) Vacctfon, suspenslon, fest (c) Restc7ned with charqe:; pendinq _ days, etc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Dropped durinq prottior.. . . . . (b) Sic.��. and tnJured . . . . . . . . . . . . (eJ Dismissed for cause . . . . . . — (f) Killed (n lir,c of d�,ity . . . . . . (c) Tempot'ary dr_tnils . . . . . . . . . . i�l) Deceased . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total separations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O Total averaqe dally ubsences . . 5. Present for duty at end of month . . . . . . . . . . . 2l 5. Avallable for patrol duty . . . . . . . . . 8.09 7.t+1 .58 1.09 •O� 9.k7 8•50 12.53 13.5� 1 . . . ` :�_ , ; . 4 � � _� �� TABLE 4-- C�l�f1E IR"D�� AI�D P(J�lIC� �CT`iVlTY TRE�lD CHANGE OFFENSES KNOWN TO THE POLICE CURRENT YEAR V5. LAST YEAR CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES VS. SAME MON7H V5. SAME PERIOD (PART 1 CLASSES) REPORTED OR ACTUAL aCTUAL THIS LAST YEAR LAST YEAR KNOWN UNFOUNDED OFFENSES YEAR TO DATE THISMONTH THISMONTH NUMBER PERCENT NUMBER PERCENT la. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER 2. FORCIBLE RAPE TOTAL 1 1 �F a. RAPE BY FORCE 1 �' b. ASSAULT TO RAPE • ATTEMPTS � 3. ROBBERY TOTAL 3 3 �'7 o. ARMED - ANY WEAPON b. STRONG-ARM - NO WEAPON 4. AGGRAVATED ASSAULT TOTAL 1 a. GUN b. KNIFE OR CUTTING INSTRUMEr1T c. OTHER DANGEROUS WEAPON d. NANDS, FIST, ET�. • AGGRAVATED - 5. BURGLARY TOTAL � a. FORCIB�E ENTRY 1 12 118 b. UNLAWFUL ENTRY • NO FORCE 2 � �O c. ATTEMPTED FORCIBLE ENTRY 2 6. LARCENY - THEFT (except auto theft) � 1 �F3 5� a. 550 AND OVER IN VALUE 7. AUTO THEFT 2 2 7�F CRIME INDEX TOTAL lb. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE L 4e. OTHER ASSAULTS - NOT AGGRAVATED vg 66. IARCENY, UNDER 550 IN VALUE � t PART I TOTAL �9 1 �$ 156g TOTAL PARTIIINCIDENTS 7.7 .................................1077.... TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS NONCRIMINAL{ALLSl� • � • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '�� 61 "" ' ' ' TOTAL GALLS FOR POUCE SERVICE . . . . . . �J•�• . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . . .....��l275. ... c AUTOMOBILES RECOVERED (A) NUMBERSTOLEN LOCALLY AND RECOVERED LOCALLY ............................................... (B) NUMBERSTOLEN LOCALLY AND RECOVERED BY OTHERIURISDICTIONS ................................... R7 ' 4 (C) TOTAL LOCALLYSTOLEN AUTOSRECOVERED .........................................••••• " " •• 1 (D) NUMBERSTOLEN OUT OFJURISDICTION,RECOYERED LOCALLY ......................................... 1 � � . . r._.._. � � f -., TABI� 5-- VALUC OF PPOPE�;TY SiOLEN Af�D RECOVERED 0 VALUE OF PROPERTY VALUE OF PROPERTY TOTAL VAIUE OF �ALUE OF PROPERTY OFFENSE �ALUE OFPROPERTY STOLEN LOCALLY STOLEN LOCALLY STOLEN OTHER STOLEN LOCALLY ANDRECOVERED ANDRECOVERED BY LOCALLYSTOLEN JURISDICTIONS LOCALLY OTHERJURISDICTION PROPERTY RECOVERED RECOVERED LOCALLY ROBBERY �? • 9 i -- BURGIARY �� 2 • O LARCENY 16�� 1 7 • � 1393� 3� AUTO THEFT OO. 00 00.00 00. 00 00. OQ TOTAL 23,L_2o. �,3 1393• 39 700. o0 2093. 39 5�0. oo: TA►BLE 6-- OFF��SES CLEARED �Y A��REST ' year to date (include exceptional clearances) _ NUMBER OF OFFENSES PERCENT OF OFFENSES CIEARED BY ARREST CLEARED BY ARREST CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES BY ARREST OF BY ARREST OF (PART I CLASSES) TOTAL CLEARED pERSONS UNDER 18 TOTAL CI.EARED pERSONS UNDER 18 THIS LAST THIS LAST THIS LAST THIS LAST YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR 1. CRIMINAL HOMICIDE a. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER b. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE 2. FORCIBLE RAPE TOTAL ��- 2 2 a. RAPE BY FORCE 1 �- b. ASSAULT TO RAPE - ATTEMPTS 1 1 3. ROBBERY TOTAL 2 2 1' o. ARMED - ANY WEAPUN �Z 1 b. STRONG-ARM - NO WEAPON 4. ASSAULT TOTAL 3� 67 8 1'3 a. GUN Z �- b. KNIFE OR CUTTIhG INSTRUMENT � c. OTHER DANGEROUSWEAPON d. HANDS, FI5T5, FEET, ETC. - AGGRAVATED e. OTHER ASSAULTS - NOT AGGP,AVATED �� 1 5� 5. BURGLARY TOTAL 7 2b 2 1-6 a. FORCIBLE ENTRY �j 2 1. b. UNLAWFUL ENTRY • NO FORCE 1 2 1 2 c. ATTEMPTED FORCIBLE ENTRY 1 1 � 6. LARCENY - THEFT (EXCEPT AUTO THEFT) 5]_ 62 16 1.7 o. S50 AND OVER IN VALUE b. UNDER SSO IN VALUE �� 'T'� �O� �� • 7. AUTO THEFT � 7 � V GRAND TOTAL 52S (��.1.�. z3b �31. � � y TABLE i-- PERSO�lS ARRESTE�, CHAt�GED Af�D DISPOSCD OF DU�1�9� (ViONTH � COURT DISPOSITIONS THIS MONTH ARRESTS PERSONS (INCLUDE RELEASED NOFORMALCHARGEI FORMALLY ADULTSGUILTY UNIFORM CLASSIFICATION OF O�FENSES : CNAP,GED ACQUITTE% REFERREDTO THIS OR JUVENILE � MONTH OF "' OF OTHERWISE COURT , TOTAL OFFENSE LESSER DISMISSED JURISDICTION JUVENILES` ADULTS TOTAL �HARGED OFFENSE 1. CRIMINAL HOMICIDE: a. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER b. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE 2. FORCIBLE RAPE 3. ROBBERY 4, AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 5. BURGLARY - BREAKING OR ENTERING 6. LARCENY - THEFT (EXCEPT AUTO THEFT) 2I. O 61. 6 O 7. AUTO THEFT 2 2 1 S. OTHER ASSAULTS (RETURN A• 4e) 1 TOTAL - PART I CLASSES 23 �� 6! L1- �- THIS YEAR TO DATE .Z �g O U O LAST YEAR TO DATE 2 6 6 PERCENT CHANGE 9. ARSON 10. FORGERY AND COUNTERFEITING 11. PRAUD 12. EMBEZZLEMENT 13. STOLEN PROPERTY; BUYING, RECEIVING, POSSESSING 14. VANDALISM I5. WEAPONS; CARRYING, POSSESSING, ETC. 16. PROSTITUTION AND COMMERCIALIZED VICE 17. SEX OFFENSES (EXCEPT 2 AND 16) ' 18. NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS 19. GAMBLING 20. OFFENSES AGAINST THE FAMILY AND CHILDREN 21. DRIVING UNDER THE INPWENCE 6 6 6 22. LIQUOR LAWS � 23. DRUNKENNESS 2 �'2 'Z '2 24. DISORDERLY CONDUCT S S 25. VAGRANCY 26. ALL OTHER OFFENSES (EXCEPT TRAFFIC) 2 2 22 24 24 20 2 2 TOTAL - PART ll CLASSES THIS YEAR TO DATE 2l 3 1- 27 1 1 2 LAST YEAR TO DATE �FO 255 � 'Z 4 � 1 '2 1 PERCENT CHANGE TRAFFIC ARRESTS THIS MONTH PHYSICAL CUSTODY ARRESTS WARRANTSSERVED CITATIONS ISSUED TOTAL TRAFFIC ARRESTS AND CITATIONS 1 I 74 I 7fi II 75 !I 72 I � 2 1 .� i j 8-79Q (Rev. 10-21-65) CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT TRAFFIC SUMMARY Police Department c�tY oc Fridley Month of December � lg ?'� TABLE l. ACCIDENT SUMMARY This Month Year to Date This Year Last Year o�. C'.hange This Year Last Yeaz c�/o Change Accident Total 66 7k —11 bk9 672 —4 � Fatal ]. + 7 2 + PersonalInjury ;Z'7 22 +22 270 266 '+'� Property Damage 3$ 51. �2b 371 3g7 "J Pedestrian 3 1. 'f' � 17 �3b TABLE 2. ENFORCEMEFlT SUt.L',1ARY � This Month Year to Date This Year Last Year o% Change This Year Last Year o�o Change Traffic Total � $ -F2 ]_]_� 1 0 —2 Hazardous Violations 6O 34 t'jfi 561 �Jl�.l —1�.1 Other Violations 10 —],Q ,'Z$(j $ —2�j Parking 20 6 -�} 17 190 +66 �� 7 59 52 +13 Accident Anests and Citations TABLE 3. C�NIPARATiVE Sti�"A?nARY Or iRAFFii. A�i,iDENTS This l�lonth Year to Date This Year Last Year o/o Change This Year Last Year o�o Change Total Accidents 6G 74 —11 649 672 —4 Fatal Accidents ], �1~ ? 2 '+ Persons Killed j�, ♦ g iZ '1' Injury Accidents 2 22 -�22 2 � 266 +1 Persons Injured g 2 -}-5�1 _-f-1 Pedestrians Killed 2 + Pedestrians Injured 3 1 ♦ 1.� . �.6 —3g Hit and Run P.ccidents g 21. °'J�2 �..�%F 1�� —5 Cleared by Arrest 1 — rj 7 ~2�% Cleared - No anesc 5 17 �71 52 7g —34 Tota� c�earea 5 18 —73 57 �5 —33 i � ' , � , ' I , I' . I ' I � I � I ' I � I ' � V' �� TABLE 4. COMPARATIVE SUP1"AARY ACCIDENTS AMD ENFORCEMENT (By Hour of Day and Day of Week) ' Monday Tuesday Wednesday 7hursday Friday Saturday Sunday Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Time dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest 12 M 1 1:00 . 1. 2:00 ]. 3:00 4:00 . 5:00 6:00 7:00 �.. �. 8:00 1 �. �. - 9:00 1 1 1. io:oo 1 1 3 2 1 1 ii:oo 1 1 i2 rr 2 ' 1 �i:oo 1 1 1 2:00 1 2 1 1. 1 a:oo 1 � 1 1 4: o0 1 1 3 1. '�� 1 1 s:oo 1 1 1 2 2 s: o0 1 1 1 7:00 1 1 2 1 1 s:oo 1 1 1 1 s:oo 1 io:oo ii:oo _ _ �'iote: °Citation and Anest" column should include a�� traffic citaEions and a*�rests u�ade during each hour period except parking citations. i � TABl.E 5. CO�APARATIVE SU�AMARY OF ENFORCEh4ENT (By Violation) This Month Year to Date This Yeaz Last Year This Year Last Year o o Change Hazardous Violations Totat 60 I.�I 5$fi 993 —�. n�v� 7 7 59 _ 5z +�3 sPeeaing �5 13 27� - 562 —52 Reckless Driving 1 6 9 �3�1' Careless Driving 3 '2 67 - 6g �2 ' Tra£fic Signal 9 l0 44 108 —60 ston s�gn 4 5 35 44 —21 Other Regulatory Sign 1. 1 15 2i —z9 Irciproper Passing �. 3 6 �5� _ _ _ .._ _ _ _ _ . Improper Turning � �'9 � Right of Way - Vehicle 1 _ ; _ 5 _ ? _ . _29 Right of Way - Pedestrian � - � -;,�'. Following Too Closely _]. 1. - 1. No or Improper Signal Improper Start from Parked Position � � Improper Backing Improper Lane Usage 'Z 12 Z� �3�' Failure to Dride - Right Defective Equipment 3 1 �}b 25 +g� Other Hazardous Violation 3 1 1-9 23 —1$ Other Violations Total =% 1.0 2�� 3$1+ "26 Parking Violation Total 2O 36 317 190 +bb `. I � � ' Fridl y MOTOR VEHICLES ' �� IU t� 40 ' U i�;� 44 U t�#� 45 ' t� kb u t� 47 ' � � 48 ' ' , __ ui��nt & ' nimmg Tags ' � ' ' � , ' ' �' Mileagfl C�a 1131 112.1 Non� 135z 5131 393$ 3693 5137 Thi� Month 137 159.9 739.7 554.4 537.9 752.3 D�cember 19 70 , MPG Exp�nae C�i 10.0 k3.15 .038 8.4 �6.3� .03k 6.9 223.62 ..043 7.1 193.R� .049 6.8 207.96 .056 6.8 317.14 .062 This YOar . 578 ��. ,