12/20/1971 - 5538FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 20, 1971 - 7:30 P. M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
INVOCATION•
ROLL CALL•
FRI�LEY CITY COUNCII1rIAN - 3RD WARD:
Receiving Letter of Resignation Effective December 15, 1971,
Frank G. Liebl, Councilman-3rd Ward
Coasideration of Resolution Declaring a Vacancy in the Of#ice of
Councilman Ward Three and Making an Appointment to Fill the
Unexpired Term o£ That Office
Swearing in of New Fridley City Councilman - 3rd Ward
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, December 6, 1971
Page 1
Page 2
�
Pages 3 - 2Z
Minutea of the Public Hearing Meeting, December 13, 1971 Pages 22 - 27
n
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 20, I971
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
VISITORS:
(Consideration of Ite�ns Not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
OLU BUSINESS:
1. Consideration of Municipal Pool for Fridley
2. Consideration of Second Reading of Ordinance for Rezoning
(ZOA ��71-09)Request to Rezone From M-1 to C-2S Area Generally
Located at the Southeast Corner of Osborne Road and T.H.��65
and Consideration of Special Use Perc�it - Castle Mobile Homes
PAGE 2
Pages 28 - 33
Pages 34 & 35'
�COMMENT: Councilman Harris placed this iteai on the Agenda because
the Planning Commission has not met to consider this item and will not
meet until Jan. 12� 1972. Staff has met with representatives of Castle
Mobile Fiomes and reviecaed with them the conditions which are recommended
to be placed on the Special Use Permit should Council grant the permit.
T:�ese conditions are; (1) When permanent facilities are built, oT,aner to
provid� an ease�nent fcr road�aay to Osborne bet:ind Frostop Drive-in
(2) Speczal_ Use Permit to be temporary for 5 years duratian' (3) Lands-
capi.ng on front of area facing T.H.�`65 (4) Si^r_ to conform to City
ordinances without a variance (5) Parking areas to be blacktopped. '
0
CTTY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1971
NEW BUSINESS:
3. Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance For
Rezoning From R-3 to C-2 - Genersl Realty
4. Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of December 8, 1971
5. Receiving the Minutes of the BuiLding Standards -
Design Control Meeting of December 9, 1971
PAGE 3
Pages 36 & 37
Pages 38 - 48
Pages 49 - 51
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1971 PAGE 4
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
6. Receiving the Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting
of December 14, 1971
7. Awarding the Contract for One 14' Van Type Truck to
Iten Chevrolet Company
8. Consideration of a Resolution Certifying Tax Levy
Requirements For 1972 to the County of Anoka for Collection
9. Consideration of a Resolution Providing for Adjusted Revenue
Estimates for the City Budget For the Year 1972
Pages 52 - 54
Pages 55 & 56
Pages 57 - 65
Pages 66 & 67
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1971 PAGE 5
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUEA)
10. Consideration of a Resolution Reducing the Assessment for the
1970 Service ConnecCion on Part of Lots 22 and 23, Parcel 2530,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 77
11. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing and Directing
the Splitting and Combining of Special Assessments o�
Part of L�ts 2 and 3, Parcels 50Q, 570, 680, and 700,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 89
12. Cansideration of a Resolution Authorizii►g and Directin�
the Combining of Special Assessments an Part af Outlot 1,
Block 1, Parcel 65, and Part of Lot 1, Block Z, Parcel 10,
Fridley Industrial Park Plat 1
Page 6$
�ages 69 � 70
Page 71
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1971
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
13. Consideration of a Resolution Correcting Resolution No. 163-
1969 (Resolution Confirming Assesaments for 1969 Service
Connections) by Withdrawing the Assessment for Sewer and
Water Laterals on the West 60 Feet of Lots 22, 23, 24, and
25, Block 7, Spring Brook Park Addition
14. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing and Directing
the Combining of Special Assessments on Part of Lot 1,
Block 1, Parcel 40, and Part of Outlot 1, Block 1, Parcel 50,
Fridley Industrial Park Plat 1
15. Claims
PAGE 6
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
16. Licenses Pages 75 - 77
I'
CiTY COUNCIL MEE�YNGfl DECEMBER 20, 1971 PAGE �
'
I, ' NEW $USINESS (CONTINUED)
17. Estimates Pages 78 - �L
�
�
'
, 18. Consideration of Approval of Final Plat P.S. ��71-03, Page 82
Innsbruck North Second Addition, Phase I and II for
� Townhouse Area
'
'
'
' 19. Consideration of Council Approyal of Loeffel-Engstra�i Page 83
Estimate ��3 by Fridley Volunteer Firemen's Relief
Association; Municipal Garage
'
, '
� ,
� '
� 20. Consideration of Joining in Class Law Suit Against Pages 84 - 87
�' Cast Iron Pipe Companies
'
I
II ' f
�
' CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 20, 1971 PAGE 8
, NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED)
' 21. Authorization to Employ a Consultant far a Market Analysis of Pages 88 - 99
Liquor Store ��1 (S[cywood)
�
�
'
IADJOURN:
'
'
'
�
' '
� '
i �
i
,
II �
II '
,
'
i1
'
'
'
,
�
�
'
'�
,
'
�
'
'
,
Mayor Jack Kirkham
City of Fridley
�30 - 67th Avenue N,E.
Fridl.ey, Minnesota 55432
Dear Mayor KirkYzam:
Frank G. Liebl
222 Mercury Drive
Fridley, Minnesota
December 14, 3971
55�+32
bue to pressur� that has been exerted on me, sinc� the election,
by persons whom I believe are more interested in their own
political careers than with the future of Fridley, I have
decided that my resignation as 3rd Ward Couneilman at this time,
is in the best interest of Fridley. By so doing, I believe
that I will initiate the first move to fulfill the promise of
�y campa3.gn for Mayor to work for non-partisan local government.
I have served for many years with the members of this Council
and we have had our differences. E�erience has taught me
that your jud�nent and concern for the City of Fridley is to
be respected. I am certain that your selection of my replacem�nt
as Third Ward Councilman will reflec� the same degree of respect,
for my concern for the Third Ward that I noyv demonstrate in
placing my confidence 3.n you to selec� a good Councilman to
serve out my term of office.
I ask on�.y that political consid�ration be left out of your
deliberations. I ask tha� you consider such men as have
demonstrated their in�erest in local government and hav� made
some contribution thereto.
My resi�nation as Third Ward Councilman is to take effect
December 15, 1971. P�Say this ac�ion b� a be�innin� of cooperation
bet�veen both parties in th� ar�a of municipal government a.nd
coramunity affa�rs. /`�
'
' _ ._
,
'
_,�
��;r e"?�. �> �,� � • �
c G. ���; :�2oun
City
.
c xs.man - �r
_%'of Fridley
�
0
. ,,
RESOLUTION N0. �" �
�
A RESOLUTION DECLARING A VACANCY IN THE OFFICE OF COUNCILMAN
WARD THItEE AND MAKING AN APPOINTMENT TO FILL THE UNEXPIRED
TERM OF THAT OFFICE
WHEREAS, Frank G. Liebl has heretofor submitted his resignation
as Councilman, Ward Three, City of Fridley, and
WHEREAS, The City Charter declares that when such vacancy exists
the Council shall forthwith appoint an eligible person to fill the
same until the next regular municipal election for the office,
NOW, THEREFORE,-BE IT RESOL EI�, B the Council of the City of
Fridley that__—____��; ��—� , � ,`'✓�.;��.�,�.,�' ��-�.�
is hereby appointed to the office of Councilman, Ward Three of the
City of Fridley until his successor has been duly elected and has
quaZified.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
� �� � �:
THIS �� DAY OF , 1971
NIAYOR - JACK 0. KIRKHAM
ATTE ST :
CITY CLEP.K - i�fARVIN C. BRUVSELL
2
�
I
�_
'
��
�
��
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER`6, 197I
PLEDGE OF .ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Kirkham led the Council and the audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag. �-
INVOCATION:
Reverend Gilbert C. Anderson, Fridley Covenant Church offered the Invocation.
Mayor Kirkham called the Regular Council Meeting of December 6, I971 to order
at 8:05 P.M.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Breider, Kelshaw, Kirkham, Liebl, Harris
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
�� „
PRESEId'I'ATION OF TROPHY TO THE FRIDLEY TIGERS FOR WINNING THE 1971 SKYLINE FOOT-
BALL CONFERENCE CHAt'KPIONSHIP:
i' Assistant Coaches Don Holum and Larry Senrick, along with about 20 of the football
.,,t team, were present. Mayor Kirkham recognized how much the Fridley Tigers have
done to promote -the name of Fridley and he appreciated their putting Fridley on
-; the map. They have earned the recognition of the City Council and he asked the
`J Captain, Mark Sampsoni to come forward along with the members of the team, and
, presented them with the trophy on behalf of the Fridley City Council with their
thanks to the team.
�
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15, 1971:
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting
of November 15, 1971 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a
voice vote, alZ voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt the Agenda as presented. Seconded by Council-
man Breider. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Niayor Kirkham declared the motion carr;:ed
unanimously.
VISITORS:
Mr. Gary Blume, 6315 Pierce Street N.E.: Request for Fill:
Mr. Blume said that he just purchased a duplex on Pierce Street in September.
� H� said he was informed by the fonner owner of the problems with the water table
and tYtat the lay of the land is such that th� laack of the lot would need some
fill. He was a�so infor��� by the City tnat l:e could ucquire this fill from the
' excess from the Burlingtor� Northern expansion yard canstruction. In October he
'� contacted the City Engin�er's office anc� made his request for from 1100 - 1500
cubic yards of fill. He was informed at that time that this did not constitute
� � �,
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 2 �
quite enough of an operation for Park Construction to handle, since the request
was so small, but they would check. Two weeks later he again got in touch with
the Engineering Department and was told that everything was all right and they
would send him out forms to fill out that would relieve Park Construction of
any liability. The forms never came, so he talked to someone in Enqineering
again, and was again told that this was not large enough an operation for Parks
to handle. He said it was mentioned by the City that perhaps he could arrange
with Park Construction to have the fill delivered if he would pay the truck
drivers. He said he is now stuck and needs some fill to raise the level of his
back yard so there is proper drainage.
Mayor Kirkham said that this seems to be an Administrative problem. The City
Manager said he has had no conversation witYi Mr. Blume directly, but there have
been many many requests for the fill. The initial requests have priority, and some
of even those have not received their fill. The City Engineer explained that he has
many many calls daily, and cannot recall this particular instance, but he would take
this gent�eman's name and address and check this out further. He said this location
is difficnit to get the equipment onto. They have received quite a few large
requests for fi1Z, and the question is how these should be apportioned. The first
priority has been fox large commercial and industrial land that is open and needing
development. Mr. Blume was to1d, if he could, to come down to City Hall and see
the City Engineer.
Park Construciion Company Blasting CompZaints:
Mr. George Steiska2, 4050 Main S�treet N.E., said he was very unhappy with the
blasting. He said he was promised a while back tha� this item would be back on
the Council Agenda, and the Mayor told him it would be on the Agenda tonight. He
said he felt the people were getting the run-around on this and there was no way
' they could come out financially. Mayor Kirkham said he had expected to have some
information from Columbia Heights by this time. Mr. Steiskal said that he was
home for the first time today and the whole house shook. Sooner or later his
house will fall down. He said on a previous occasion he went to court on blasting
� damage and he did not receive enough to cover his damages. He said his garage
came apart and he still has cracks ther.e from the last blasting. He said he did
not believe he should be subjected to this:
�
�
�
�
�
�
The City Manager replied that he had met with Park Construction and Columbia
Heights. Columbia Heights has engaged an architect to make a recommendation to
them. The level of blasting has been severly curtailed and through the assurances
of Twin City Testing, if the level of the seismograph reac'4ings are about 2.0"
per second there could be damage. The level of blasting Fridley has required is
.3" per second which is about 7 times less than the general figure suggested as a
tolerance level by the Bureau of Mines and Twin City Testing. iie then read a
letter received from Fireman's Fund Ar.lerican Insurance Companies, the insurance
company for Barton Contracting Company, in which they state that if it appears
that some damage was done every e£fort will be made to settle the claim with the
home owner. He added that the City Building inspector has made inspections of
the homes besides the inspection by the insurance company.
Mr. Steiskal. said that when t�:ey take the seismograph readings they set it on
the d-riveY,ray. Th�r� is about a 4° laye-r o: s�nd. Cbove a layer of clay. The
tremors follow the clay and the sand �:cts as a cushion. The City Manager said
the Columbia Heights City e.,�ployee is tr.ained in taking seismograph readings.
Columbia Heights felt thev�could get a more positive check by having one of their
..,
� REGULAR'COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 3 e�
� �- �
�,-
'__ _ -
�
�;
�J
'
�
own employees rather than a company employee taking the readings. Mr. Steiskal
asked if Columbia Heights is doing this all by themselves or is Fridley helping.
The City Manager said tha-t Golumbia Heights has a much greater problem than
Fridley in that the number of homes invo�ved is much larger. They have suspended
the blasting at this point. Mr. Steiskal asked why Frialey has not. There are
only about 16 families involved, but what about them? Mayor Kirkham said the
Council has followe8 the recommendations they have received and this is why the
blasting level was reduced. He added that they intended to follow the recom-
mendations of Columbia Heights when their consultant makes his recommendation
to them. Mr. Steiskal said that his area seems to be a forgotten neighborhood
of Fridley. He said he has lived there 17 years and he knew of three times the
Fire Department was called and twice they got lost. Councilman Liebl said he
would take exception to that remark, it was uncalled for, and Fridley does have
a good Fire Department. Mr. Steiskal said he understood on one occasiofl the
Fire trucks got tied up with the trains, but they did not have to take.that
route. ' �
Councilman Liebl said that Mr. Steiskal had called him and he assured him that
1 everything possible would be done to protect their property. He said he also
advised him that it would be foolish to file a claim at this point ixntil the
blasting is completed. When it is done, the Building Inspector will again be
sent down for another thorough investigation. At that time, if there is,damage,
, the City Attorney will assist the people in getting any reimbursement they
have coming.
'
�
'
�
�
�
�
,
Mr. James Hentges said he lived in Columbia Heights and was speaking on behalf of
his parents, Mr. and Mrs. Buckholtz at 4045 Main Street N.E. He said Park Cons-
truction Company is guilty of a number of violations of their agreement. They
are not supposed to haul un-til 7:00 A.M. and they are supposed to stop at 6:30
P.M: They started hauling at 6:00 A.M. According to the agreement with Eurlington
Northern they were not supposed to do any blasting until they got up the berm.
The construction trucks are traveling on 44th Avenue and Main Street and they are
not supposed to. They are hauling on the streets with an illegal vehicle, a
"Euc" (Euclid) truck. Columbia Heights is not going to give them their blasting
permit until the claims are �iled. There is talk about reducing the level of
the charges, but it takes more time to drill more holes and use less powder and
Park does not want to do that. Fridley should take action: In Columbia Heights
there are about 120 home owners involved, and he must ask that Fridley revoke
the permit as Columbia Heights has done. He said his mother was in the hospital
as she had had a heart attack, she was brought home, but had to be put back in
because the blasting was so upsetting. He said if he must, the people will get
an injunction against Park Construction and against the City of Fridley.
Mayor Kirkham asked if the "Euc" truck he spoke of is the kind they use in the
mining country and Mr. Hentges said yes, they are iZ2ega1 to use on the streets,
but he saw one today. Mr. Carl PauZson said tlzat he has seen the trucks using
Main Street going 50 D7PS - 6Q MPH. These companies should not be allowed to
violate Frid2ey's ordinances. Mayor Kirkham said he would like to have all the
pAopZe with informatian turn it in to the City Nianager tomorrow. If anyone is
aware of any violation, bring it to the a�tentian of City Hall immediately, do
not �;ait un�il the Co�ir.cil i•'ee�ing, tilen it is too late to pu-rsue it. If a
violation is seen, perhaps with prompt reporting, they could be caught in the
aci.
�
�
1
'
�
�
,
,
'
,
,'
'
�
r
�
�
'
�
'
�
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 4
Mr. Hentges said at the November 22nd Meeting in Columbia Heights, Park Con-
struction said they would be done bZasting in Fridley by the end of the week.
This is the reason he brought hzs moth�r home from the hospital. Nearly three
weeks have passed and they still are not done. He said they will hear about this
in Columbia Heights and Parks will not get their permit. He said his folks have
lived here for 32 years and surely they should have some rights. He asked that
their homes be checked before there is any more blasting. Mr. Henry Zimmer,
4021 California Street N.E., said that the homes have been checked by the company,
and they offer a variety of excuses why the cracks are in the houses, such as the
_ .
humidity level, temperature level, etc.
Councilman Harris suggested that all the residents get their information in to the
City Manager the next day, and the Council could meet in executive session
tomorrow night. He did not feel the Council could wait another two weeks for
the next Council meeting - that would be two more weeks of blasting. The people
in Columbia Heights should not be having so much trouble with Fridley, and he
would Iike to see the problems ironed out. Both communities should operate with
the same guidelines. There must be a halt to these complaints, and the operation
should be unified.
The Council agreed, after a short discussion, that when the City Manager receives
his information the next day, he will contact the Council on setting up an exec-
utive session.
�
�'. Richard Harris said that as to the traffic problems, he ihought the policemen �
working for Park Construction could use more discretion in their direction of
traffic. In bad driving conditions the traffic is tied up all the way from the
Minneapolis Waterworks to Mississippi Street. When the streets are dry, the
traffic is all right.�.He objected to the Park trucks being given the right of
way, the citizens have the right to the highway too. The City police were directing
traffic and he knew they saw the "Euc" truck in the traffic, so the Administration
is cognizant of its use. Counci7lnan Kelshaw asked just what was a"Euc" truck.
Mr. Harris repliec3 t.hat it is an overszzed truck used in mining operations. It
is extra wide - about 15', and carries about 45 ton, and is chartreuse in color.
It looks like a very big dump truck. He said he has seen it being used several
mornings. The Administration does know, the Police are running them through the
traffic. The City Manager said he had receivecz some complaints on -the rush hour
traffic being held up. He talked to Park Construction and they agreed that they
would not travel south between 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 A.M.
A member of the audience invited the CounciZ to come do�Am to their homes and feel
for themselves what the blasting is like. He said Mzyor Nawrocki did and this is
one of the reasons the blasting permit wa.s revoked in Columl�ia Heights.
Mr. Carl Paulson: Nursina Homes:
Mr. Paulson said that he had been disturbed by the report carried in the Minneapolis
Tribune on the quality of nursing homes. He suggested perhaps some thought should
bP given_to this problem before it becomes one in the City of Fridley.
>1
'
�
'
'
�
�
�
�. � .
��
�
'J
�
�
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971
PAGE 5
PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING REQUEST ZOA #71-09 BY CASTLE MOBILE HOMES:
(Generally located at the southeast corner of Osborne Road and Highway #65.)
The City Engineer showed the area proposed to be rezoned on the overhead projector
and said that this has been before the Council once before, but the Planning
Commission had not yet made their recommendation. They have met since then and
their recommendation for denial can be found in the November 17, I971 Minutes. ___— "
They did not seem to be opposed to the rezoning as such, but they wanted there
to be some plans for the use of the property before they approved a rezoning.
This land was originally zoned commercial, then it was rezoned to indusfixial.
Councilman Harris suggested that this item be discussed again when the Planning
Coi►unission Minutes are reached on the Agenda. This involves a rezoning and also
a special use permit. Mayor Kirkham asked if anyone wished to be heard on this
item, with no response.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to close the Public Hearing on the rezoning request
ZOA #71-09 by Castle Mobile Homes. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously and
the hearing closed at 8:50 P.M. �
AWARDING OF BIDS FOR WORRNIEN`S COMPENSATION INSURANCE:
(Bids Opened 2:00 P.M., November 24, 1971)
COMPLETE SYNOP5IS OF BTDS ON FILE IN THE FINANCE DIRECTOR'S OFFICE
Following are the agencies submitting bids;
- . Loss Par.ticipating
Flat Dividend Plans Dividend Plans Retrospective Plans
Ins. Service Agcy.
Nc Narriera Ins .
Rice Creek Agcy.
Cavanaugh Ins.
Employers
Employers
Rice Creek Agcy.
Carr-Preus Ins.
Mc.-Namera Ins.
Mc Namera Ins.
Miner Mc Alpen
P.M. Endsley
Federated
P.M. Endsley
Mc Namera Ins.
Employers
Employers
Employers
Employers
' The City Manager called the Council's attention to his memorandum found in the
CounciZ Agenda, and i.ntroduced Mr. Lel�d C. Douglas, Bachman-Anderson, Inc., who
serves as insurance consultant to the City af Fridley. He said he had discussed
' the bids with Mr. Douglas and their recommendation is to award the bid to P.M.
Endsley using a Ioss participating plan on a one year basis.
i
r
�
Councilma.n Liebl said the Council must determine not only the lowest premitun,
but also the best coverage for the employees and asked Mr. Douglas if he con-
sidered this plan the best. He also asked Mr. Douglas to explain the differences
between the flat dividend plan, the loss participating dividend plan and the
r"tr�spective plan, Mr. Douglas said first, yes, he considered their recommendation
the best cove-rage for the City's em.nloy��es, and �,*�nt on the explain the advantages
and disadvanta�es of each method of corerag� �s outlined on Pages 6 and 7 of the
Council Agenda.
, REGULAR COTNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 6 �
' ' MOTION by Counciltnan Liebl to award the bid for Workmen's Compensation Insurance
for the year 1972 to P.M. Endsley Company using fhe loss participating dividend
plan as recommended by the City Manager and_the insurance consultani. Seconded �i
' by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE FOR REZONZNG RE UEST ZOA ##7I-07 WAY
� DAR LAND CORPORATION BY WAYNE PETERSON TO REZONE FROM R-3 T0 C�2 THAT AREA
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SERVICE DRIVE OF T.H. #47 NORTH OF 53RD AVENUE:
' The City Engineer suggested that the second reading of this ordinance be held up
until the final plans axe thraugh the subcommittees and come be�ore the Council
for approval, then the CounciZ can act on them together.
,
'
�
, �
r
'
�J
�
�
'
'
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to table the rezoning ordinance �or Way Dar Land
Corporation until the final plans are ready for CounciZ action. Seconded by
CounciZman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried unanimously. �
FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO_GENERAL TELEVISION OF
11VC:UKYUI2ATED� ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASS2GN�, mn nPFRATR ATTi1 nrtni-rTma-rrr
A COMMUNITY TELEVISiON SYSTEM IN THE CITY; SETTING FORTH CONDITIONS ACCOMPANYING
THE GRANT OF FRANCHISE; PROVIDING FOR CITY REGULATZON AND USE OF THE COMMUNITY
TELEVISION SYSTEM; AND PRESCRIBTNG PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF ITS PROVISIONS:
Councilman Liebl said at this point, it seems proper for the Council to go
through the ordinance and fill in the blanks as to fees, the number on the
advisory committee, and any other suggested changes the Council may have.
His first suggestion would be on Page 26, Section 19 to insert the number "27"
television channels --,-, The rest of the Council agreed on that figure.
The next section discussed was Section 22 - Rates, starting.on Page 27. Councilman
Breider said that on one of the proposals the figure suggested was $5.50 and he
felt that something less than the $9.95 Bloomington used should be considered,
therefore, he would suggest using the figure $6.00 as the primary installation
charge. Councilman Liebl suggested that the words "no-t to exceed" be used through-
out the ordinance in the discussion of the fees. He said he did not want the
figure set so low the company would be forced to come back before the Council and
ask for an increase. The primary concern is good sexvice to the citizens, and
he would not want the m�imum set so low the company awarded the franchise could
not live up to it. There should be a ceiling set, but not a minimum. Councilman
Breider said he would agree there should be a ceiling, but not $9.95. He said he
did not know how much money it took to run a cable system, but he would assume,
since one company quoted a$5.50 figure, that they could run their business
profitably using that figure. Even if they did have to go through a rate increase,
the rate could still be controlied by increments. He pointed out that on the
comparison sheet provided the Council of communities having cable television
there are four communities that have no connection charge.
Cnuncilman Harris wondered if, on Page 36, Section 28 dealing with the Advisory
' Canunittee, sugg�sting fees could be one of tneir duties. The City Attorney said
that the sect�_on was t�,rit�en �;; th flex.ibility bec�use t.ere might be a n�;mber of
duties the Council would ��ant to refer to the comnitte2. Tha rate structure
' could be referred to them from time to time. If the ordinance passes in its
present form, the charges are set by the ordinance, and to change them would
,
�
�_�.
'
�
'
'
'
'
,
'
'
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971
PAGE 7
require an amendment to the ordinance. The ordinance would permit the company to
charge up to the maximum set by the Council.
Councilman Liebl pointed out that there was only one municipality in the metro-
politan area that is charging $9.95 for installation, and that is Bloomington.
Mayor Kirkham noted on the comparison sheet that those having a lesser installation
charge are those having a longer franchise period. Councilman Harris pointed out
that any figures inserted in the ordinance tonight would still be subject to fhe
review of the company receiving the franchise, and they could ask for a change in
rates. He added that it is really not an apt comparison to compare a metropolitan
community with one in an outlying area, such as Bemidji or St. Cloud. He suggested
using "not to exceed $7.50" as a compromise. Councilman Liebl said that he would
like to see the maximum set at $9.95 with the understanding that it could not
be raised for five years. Councilman Harris said he offered his compromise as an
effort to find a figure to agree upon. An installation fee may be waived by the
company during sales campaigns, but if a company finds that they cannot make it,
they would reduce their sales campaigns. Councilman Kelshaw said he would agree
there would have to be a ceiling, and he would certainly want something of good
quality, Perhaps the $7.50 figure would be a happy medium. Counci2man Breider
agreed and said that a$7.50 figure would be the maximum he would aqree:to. Mayor
Kirkham said that if the $9.95 figure was adopted, the company wouZd have more
latitude and could then reduce or waive the fee during sales promotions.. He said
he would prefer the $9.95 figure, but in the interest of compromise, he would
accept the $7.50 figure.
The Council agreed for the lalanks left for installation charges on Pages 27 and
28, Section 22, the words "not to exceed $7.50" are to be inserted.
The Council then discussed the monthly service charges. (Section 22, B) The
suggestion was made by Councilman Breider, with the agreement of the Council, that
a paragraph be added -to this secion on Page 30, B-6 to provide for a 50% discount
of the regular rates for those senior citizens 62 years of age ox over. The
Council then agreed that for single family dwellings, multiple dwellings, commercial
and mobile homes the first outlet is not to exceed $5.50 with each additional out-
let not to exceed $1.OQ. There is to be a sliding scale applied to multiple family
dwellings, commercial and mobile homes as follows:
5 - 19 Units
� 20 - 59 Units
60 -100 Units
Over -100 Units
�
II
�
,
r
�
�
Not to exceed $4.75
Not to exceed $3.50
Not to exceed $2.25
Not to exceed $1.25
The City Manager pointed out that in this section, C- Disconnection was added.
This was so that a subscriber could not get a reduced or waived installation fee,
then in the future decide he did no� want cable television, only to have the
company charge a high disconnection fee.
Councilman Liebl suggested, with the agreement of the Council, for Section 28 -
C'�TV Advisory Committ�e, that there be 5 members w'ith 1 for a one year term, 2
for a term of two years, and 2 for a t�rm of three years ar.d thereafter their
succ�ssors shall be apLOinted for a�.�x-m of tnree years.
Councilman Liebl asked if in Section 9, Page 6, the Council was in agreement that
the franchise length should be 15 years, and added that he understood that it would
take about 1� years to put the system into operation, and there was some indication
�
1
'
�J
'
,
'
'
��
'
' -_
'
�'
J
J
C,
II,
I�
�
��
'
�
'
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971
PAGE 8
made that it would be about 7 years befoxe the compa�y would be showing a profit,
therefore, he felt that 15 years would be fair to the company and also the
community. The rest of the Council agreed that 15 years seemed fair.
Councilman Harris asked how the rates are covered in regard to non-profit
organizations. The City Manager said this is covered in Section 22, E- Cable-
casting Rates, on Page 31. Councilman Harris suggested the heading be changed
to: "E. Cablecasting Rates �or all Educationai, Library, Governmental and Non-
profit Community Organization Users".
Mr. Jim Gibson said he had a comment to make regarding Section 14 - Inspection of
Property and Records, D, on Page 31. He felt the complete set of maps should be
available at City Hall for ihe use of all contractors, and this provision should
be mandatory. After a short discussion:it was decided to make the first sentence
read as follows: "The company shall provide to the City a current map or set of
maps----". >
Counciiman Liebl called the Council's attention to the newspaper cZipping regarding
the Bloomington lawsuit involving their award of the franchise and read the state-
ment of the.presiding judge as follows: "A cable television franchise is not
amenable to the lowest responsible bidder concept because of the subjective
determinations.° He asked the City Attorney his views. The City Attorney said
he had called the Bloomington City Attorney to request a copy of the judge's
decision, but had not received it yet. He said he would agree with the judge
and in his opinion this is not the type of activity necessitating the calling
for sealed competitive bids, and the award need not be made in the same way as
for a bid. ,
Councilman Kelshaw said that the charge has been made that the Council is moving
too fast, but he, persanally, felt that this has been going on for a long time,
and that he has spent many long hours on this project. He said this is not con-
sidered as a revenue to the City and that Fridley will be proud in the future to
have taken a big step forward and d.one something good for mankind. He said he
certainly appreciated the input fxom the citizens and also the fine job the
companies have done in getting theix information to the Council. He said the
drive to St. Cloud to look over their system was a very valuable experience.
The School District started on a shoestring and noca have a fine system with
very little problems. The school seems to be very pleased with the system. He
said he went through the school and the youth are very involved in cable tele-
viszon. Contrary to the fear the Council has heard here in Fridley, in St.
Cloud, they have trouble filling one public access channel. This leads him to
believe that the provisions for public access are more than adequate for
Fridley. He said he has gone through all three proposals thoroughly and is
certain any of the three companies could do a fine job in Fridl.ey, which makes
the problem of picking one company a very difficult decision. He said the
comment was made, and he would agree, that it would be an asset to have a local
company. The local company also does not have any other system currently under
construction and could devote their full attention to Fridley. This local
company has their home office in Minneapolis, so if there were any problems,
F_�id�ey could get attention irimedi�tely. As he stated when he took office, when
selecti_ng a City Attc-rr_ey, he felt tna'� i.t snould be sc-��one local, because h�
would then be �,�a]_ing �,iti� his o�.�n i.�eople a1:d ��.�ould have to live with tnem. He
said with�these things in mind he would like to make the following mo�ion:
1�
�
m
� REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 9 ��
� _`
�
'
MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to approve the cable television franchise ordinance
on first reading and waive the reading, also to award the franchise under the
terms of the ordinance to General Te.Zevision of Minnesota, incorpora-ted, and
instruct that the ordinance be brought back for second reading on December 13,
1971. Seconded by Councilman Liebl.
Councilman Breider said he would agree with this, and added that the imput has ,-
been excellent. The four school districts have asked that this be held up, but
he feit there was no need for further delay. The ordinance provides adequate
safeguards for the changzng technology, and he believed this ardinance has
every provis.ion in it that he was concerned with.
' Councilman Liebl questioned in Section 28, CATV Advisory Committee, Page 36, how
the members are to be appointed; by a majority vote of the Council? The City
Manager said he had thought in terms of a simple majority, and would add a �
� sentence to that effect, if the Cauncil desired. Mayor Kirkham cornmented that
this action furthers the image of leadership Fridley has enjoyed in the�last
severaZ years.
' THE VOTE upon the motion,,being a roll call vote, Breider, Kelshaw, Kirkham,
Liebl, and Harris voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declaxed the motion carried unanimously.
' , RECESS:
__,� Mayor Kirkham declared a recess at 9:50 P.M. The Council Meeting reconvened at
10:15 P.M.
`�"` DISCUSSION REGAI2DING RELOCATION OF 115 KV LINE WITHIN CITY OF FRIDLEY:
� Mr. Warren Johnson, Northern States Power Company, said he was happy to report the
definite progress that has been made in the relocation of the II5 KV line. He
gave a copy of the letter from NSP dated October 27, ].97Z, signed by G.R. Coleman,
' along with' the approval by Burizngton Northern, siyned by Robert A. Juba, ta the
Council to receive. He then referred to the letter from Burlington Northern
. dated November 26, 1971 and signed by Robert A. Juba, and read it aloud for the
� Council. In it Burlington Northern states they have now received approval of
their engineering and communications people. He said on the basis of Burlington
Northern approval, they have ordered their material and scheduled their con-
� struction crew to start January 3, I972, and hope to be ccmpleted, weather
permitting, the first week in February, 1972.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the above referenced letters. Seconded by
Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote all voting aye, NSayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MIDIUTES OF THE PLANNIAIG CO`�1NIISSION NIEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 1971:
VACATION REQUEST: SAV �71-07 BY VIRGINIA T. JACOBSEN: To vacate East-West
alley in Block 3, Spring Brook Park Addition �
�' b�OTIU.�7 by Cou_:c.�l~nan Br_�ider tn s, t �.i�� Pt�%:lic _�arin�, na-:`_e fo-r tY1e vacation
requested by Virc�inia T. Jacobsen for January 10, 1972. Seconded by Councilman
II � Liebl. Upon a voice vote, a]_1 voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried urianimously.
II ' G .\
,
1
V�
u
��
�
��
'
,�
' �
�
�
'
L__1
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETiNG OF DECEMBER 6, 1971 _. PAGE 10
REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #71-09, BY CASTLE MOBILE HOMES, INC.: To rezone the
westerly 600 feet of the northerly 750 feet of the NE�, of the NW�a of Section
12 to be rezoned from M-1 (light industrial area) to C-2S (general shopping
area) _ :
AND
12
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #71-14, CASTLE MOBILE HOMES, INC.: ---�'
Per Section 45.101 3N of the Fridley.City_Code for the location of mobile
home sales on the westerly 600 feet of the southerly 320 feet of the northerly
750 feet of the NE� of the NW; of Section.l2 _.
Councilman Harris said that he felt that this item should properly be discussed
under the Planning Commission Minutes. This property was originally commercial,
then it was changed to light industrial. As late as 1- 2 weeks ago, the City
talked about locating a municipal off-sale store on this property. Under the
ordinance the City �ould not haye located there under the present zoning. He
said he would have'to differ with the Planning Commission in regard to the use
of this property. The concern has always been not to get into a situation where
there is strip zoning, anci to make sure it is a substantial piece o£ property
�or development. This piece o� property is substantial, and it is also located
alang the highway and he felt it should be developed to commercial as there is
access to the highway. It appeared to him th�t this whole area is being used
as commercial with the exception of Strite-Anderson. He said the best and highest
use of the land would be commercial and he could see no reason to have property
fronting on a highway zoned industrial.
Councilman Breider said he would agree, maybe the best use oP the land would be
commercial, but why trailer sales? His main objection io the plans Viking
Chevrolet presented was that it appeared to be a sea of 3alacktop and this
appears to be the same, with no structure. Councilman Harris said they would
only be u.sing the south portion of the lot for mobile home sales and they would
then close their sales Iot further south. He said he would c3isagree with fihe
comment made fhat there should be a permanent structure. In that case there
would still have to be a special use permit, and there would be some obligation
to perpetuate that permit. He said they will have controls the City did not
have wif_h the original plan. They will requ:ire a ceri�ificate of occupancy and
without that they could not use the Iand, and if tney did not comply, they could
not get the certif.icate. He suggested putting the permit on a fzve year basis
to allow them to be able to amortize their investment. Mr. Rotter, Castle Mobile
Homes, said that would be satisfactory to them.
' Councilman Liebl sai.d that he must agree with the comm�nts of Chairman Erickson.
Two years ago the Counc�l granted a special use permit to Castle Mobile Homes to
operate a mobile trailer sales office subject to the stipuZations of the Bui�ding
Standards - Design Control. These requirements were violatefl. The permit was
' given to Castle Mobile Homes with t:ne stipulations they v�ere to blacktop their
driveway, the vehicles were to be 15' apart and now they are a�out 5' apart,
thexe were to be restrooms, security lighting and there were violations of the
' s=nn ordinance. He said the question to be answered is if this would be detri-
men�al to a comrr.tznity tryir.g �c� build a fiYr�� �ax b��s�. If thi.s Cot�nc.il a.grees
to this rezor,zng, he wo�.lcl '_�ke to ii:;;�re�s }����o�� t�ie a.�plican?:s that he wiould
certainly like soM� assurance tlzey caill live up to the requzremen-ts placed on
' them. These violations a.re what irrit�ted the Pl�znning Ccmmission, and the end
' �
�
�
I
, �
' REGUI,AR�COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6 1971
PAGE 11
-� _
r' result of their present business location is a disgrace. A temporary building
would not be an asset to the area. As Mr. Minish and Mr. Schmedeke point out
II ! in the minutes, this would create a traffic problem and the City would be
� obligated to give access.
��
'
�
�
`J
��
�
�
u
�
L_�
'
�
�
Mr. Rotter said he was a resi8ent of Fridley and is proud of his City and wants
to contribute to it. Their company was formed in Fridley, and has become very
successful in the State of Minnesota. He said he does his banking in Fridley
and wants to call Fridley his home. Many people do not consider mobile home
sales a business wanted in the City of Fridley. He said if the Council would
want to impose restrictions on them, they would be happy to comply with them.
He said in respect to the violations, the only one they were aware of was the
sign violation. As to the blacktop driveway, he said he spoke to someone, and
his understanding was that it was to be a hard surface, so they put on Class V
with a coat of oil�. They do have a security lighting system and restrooms.
As to the vehicZes parked too close together, this was only recently because
they have outgrown their location, and this is what prompted them to look for
another Iocation. He said he did not know they were in violation of the sign
ordinance with their pennants until it was pointed out to them at the Planning
Commission Meeting. He said they have had inspections, and if they were in
violation, they should have been told and they would have corrected them. Mr.
Swanson added that the pennants have only been up for about a month. �
Councilman Harris said that this property is large enough to support a good
commercial development. Putting a permanent structure into the ground at this
time would be a mistake. 'If the applicants have a five year special use permit,
they may find out that the property is so valuable that it is no longer feasible
to operate a sales office at that location and would sell to a higher commercial
use. if that should happen, a small permanent structure could be a detrimen-t.
Mr. Rotter said yes, they would use the land for a sales office, but if a buyer
should make a good offer, they would sell.
Councilman Harris said that they would operate under a certificate of occupancy,
and he felt that the special use permit request should go back �o the Planning
Commission for them to make a recortmendation on what it should contain. Those
conditions would be made a part of the permit, if the Council felt they were fair
and reasonable, and they could not operate until those conditions were met.
Mayor Kirkham agreed and commented that if they were allowed to continue their
business in violaiion, it was the City's fault, not theirs. Councilman Kelshaw
suggested the records be checked to see if there is a record af these vialations.
Councilman Liebl commented that his remarks coere not meant pexsonally, but he has
to respect the recommendations of tne Planning Con,mission who go into greater
detail on every request than the Counci.l does. These are men who give their
time voluntarily. He added that he hoped the applicants would keep their word
and Mr. Rotter said they certainly would.
MOTION by Councilman Hzrris to approve the rezoning ordinance for Castle Mobile
Homes on fixst reading, Taaive the reading, and instruct that the special use
per_ms.t be sent b<zck to th� F1a:�ning Ce:-::��.�ssior_ for their recom�e�ndation. The
SECOI7C3 Yc ��lIl'� tC r''? '_r'°_ ± C� L'Z? �1'1 �il`,".i?_' �:'.C:�'i'_i;�.1 ��.t10:1 1S received by t.ilr�'_. COL2T1C1.� .
Seconded hy Council..;�n Bieider.
Councilman Liebl said this F�ould not be fair to the Planning Commission and would
be taking advantage af these men, and amounts to putting the carriage before the
1�
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, I971 PAGE 12
horse. Councilman Harris pointed out the Council would have their evaluatian
before the second reading. Councilman Liebl said they have alxeady given their
opinion and this would be an insult. How can tney make an i.mpartia� decision
when the Council has already taken official action? Mayor Kirkham said this
would not be setting a precident, merely a matter of saving some time. Council-
man Harris said that this is no di�ferent than two previous situations he could
think of in which the Council reversed the decision of the �lanning Commission.
THE VOTE upon the motion, being a roll call vote, Kirkham, Harris, Breider and
Kelshaw voting aye, Liebl voting nay, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Breider to receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of November 17, 1971. Seconded by CounciZman Harris. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BUILDING STANDARDS - DESIGN CONTROL MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 23, 1971: '
14
1. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUGT PROJECT II (258 UNIT) APARTMENT COMPLEX
� LOCATED ON THAT PORTION OF fiHE EAST '� OF THE SOUTHEAST '� OF 5ECTION 24, LYING
NORTH OF INTERSTATE #694, FRIDLEY,�MINNESOTA. (RE�UE5T BY VIEWCON, IIVC.,
5901 OSSEO ROAD, BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA): �
� •
��
'
,
�
�
�
I�
�
� � ��
The City Engineer reparted that the Building Board recommended approval subject
to their stipulations. This plan provides for a greater number of units with a
smaller space per unit. The average size of apartment units the past few years
has been quite good. They will be providing underground parking and recreational
facilities. The outside treatment carries the same theme in using rough sawn
cedar siding. He then showed the plans on the easel.
Councilman Harris asked if the exterior is flat, or if there is any relief. Mr.
Dan Swedberg said theze was relief within each unit through the use of balconies.
There are also stair towers which provide some relief. The roof lines break
�L allows separation of the building into four disiinct wings. The breaks are
about 10` in depth. All the one bedroom units are on the ground floor and the
wider two bedroom and efficiencies above so there is a sheltering effect above
the first floor. They are arranged in blocks with the block reversed on the
other side which also provides for some variety in the appearance of the front.
He added there are 6" sunken living rooms. There will be underground parking,
also some surface parking on the side.
Councilman Kelsha�,r a�ked the construction c�st per unit and Mr. Chuck Van Eeckhout
replied between $15,000 to $16,000. CounciZman Harris asked what size the units
are to be. bir. S�aedberg replied �he effi cienciES are 521 square feet, the one
bedroom units are 630 square feet ar_d the two bedroom units are 805 square feet.
These units will not draw a high rental; the effi ciency will rent for $13$, the
one bedroom $168 and the two bedroom for $195. There are 138 one bedroom units,
60 two bedroom units and 60 efficiencies. Councilman Harris said these units
were ver.y small, and was not really the concept he had envisioned for Viewcon.
N'�. S��redber_g saic� their apartr.t�nt units are broken down into two proposals. The
other nhase of the �n�:rt_��,ant �.-coject a�z��zdy ��preved ;a� s more spacious and hact
c7 t11U�iit�-.� T:::1f.. �� �1c.VLiiC �l!.� �;IQ i=i'ti°Si �i?:^_.1' CZt_�^._ �. '.�u�Y'1°tV t.0 �.IlE CllSLGi;1�Y�
and they would be able -4o achieve a good mixture. Mr. Van Eeckhout added that
, . . � �
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 13
�
f`
�
'
�
�
the other apartment units previously approved were much more luxur�ous and the size
is from 1050 square feet to 1200 square feet. The quality of construction will
be the same with the smaller units. He said they had two choices in how to
achieve a lower rent; one was to reduce their quality, which they did not want
to do, and the other was to maintain the same high quality, but reduce the square
footage. This is what they chose to do. There are many people that just cannot
afford to pay $275 -$300 in rent, and they wanted to give all people an oppor-
tunity to be abZe to rent in the area.
MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to table this iiem to the next regular Council Meeting
and in the meantime, he would Iike to meet with Viewcon to settZe some questions
he still has in his mind. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote,all
voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Van Eeckhout told Councilman Kelshaw he would be happy to meet with him and
asked him to contact him to set up a meeting. ,
2. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO THE EXISTrNG $UILDING
� LOCATED ON LOT 23 AND 24, $LOCK 7, ONAWAY ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7735
BEECH STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY INVENTORS ENGINEERING,
INC., 7735 BEECH STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA):
�
�
The City Engineer said #hat Inventors Engineering, Inc. plans on putting on a new
front on their existing structure and sprucing up their building. This building,
when originally built, did not have adequate parking and the concept was to open
up the plat�ed alley. The alley is not opened at this time, but he felt it should
be to provide access at the back and get the parking away from the front. He
then showed the area on the overhead projector. They are now going onto their
neigh}�ors property to .get to the parking area they are using just south of their
building. The westerly � of the block is developed Iight industrial and he would
assume the easterly � would be developed in the same manner. Councilman Breider
asked it there was no place to put a parking lot. The City Engineer said there
was about 20' behind the building next to the a11ey, which would be tight, but
could be used. They are parking in front of the building now.
� Mr. Paul Smith, Inventors Engineering, Inc., said they were trying to make
arrangements with the gentleman owning the lot to the south, and if he grants
permission, they will continue to park on the south side of the building. He
� would like to come to an agreement with him to blacktop that area. As soon as
the aZley is opened in back they will blacktop the-re with the objective being to
remove the parking in front. He said th�y would also be willing to try to arrange
� for parking across the street. He said his company makes automated machines and
they want their building to ref.Iect the quality of their product, and he did not
want parking in the front. He said he was very concerned with finding a solution
to this problem. He said at the present time they have I4 employees and their
� present plans involve making two buildings into one. On the right side of the
building there is a loading chute and they are planning to make this into office
space. They will be eliminating an overhead door and upgrading the front of the
� b�tilding. The otfices will be all carpeted, along �aith the er.gineering lab. If
they could get a l�ading chute in the back, t�hey would eliminate the other one
in �r.ont.
�
� �
The C�.ty En�ineer said, i.f the Council anpr.oves the plans, he would recommend,
besides the Bzi.lding Board stipulations, that there be an agreement with the
propert� owner. to the south to blacktop that l.ot. Also to try to get that alley
�
�
�
�
_I
�
LI
�
� .
�
�
�
�
� ��
� \ ,�
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971
PAGE 14
opened up and blacktop the back portion of his ].ots. He is also to put in some
plantings. This will be an improvement to a difficult situation.
Mr. Richard Harris said he owns Lots.1-7 across the alley and just to the north
of this site. He said he was not in favor of "T" alleys because the trucks cannot
get around the corner. He questioned whether the alley could be run out to 77th
Avenue. The City Engineer said he was not suggesting that the alley be opened ,
now until the easterly � of the block develops. This would be a long range thing, �
and what is done with the alley would depend on how the east '� of tYze block
develops. He added that the property just south of Block 7, along 77th Avenue,
is zoned industrial., but there are some residential homes on the lots. He felt
that with the industrial devel.opment going on in Onaway, that property wil].
become too valuable for them to ho1d, and it will eventually be sold as industrial
property.
MOTION by Council.man Breider to approve the plans for Inventors Engineering, Inc.,
subject to the Building Standards - Design Control stipulations with the additional
conditions suggested by the City Engineer. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
3. CONSIDERATTON OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A PROPOSED FOUR STALL GARAGE LOCATED
ON IATS 11, 12, 13 AND 14, BLOCK,3, SPRING BROOK PARK ADDITION, THE SAME
BEING 231 79TH WAY N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (RE�UEST BY VIRGINIA T. JACOBSEN,
231 79TH WAY N.E., FRIDLEY, MINN�SOTA):
, -!
MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the plans for the garage as submitted, with
the permit to be withheld until the vacation of the al.ley is completed. Seconded
by Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to receive the Minutes of the Building Standards -
Design Control Meeting of November 23, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw.
Upon a voi•ce vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried
unanimausly. �
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEAI,S MEETING OF NOVEMBER 23, 1971:
l. A�UEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION �15.134, 6, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO REDUCE
THE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK, WHEN ATd PA-Z PROPERTY IS AbJACENT TO A DIFFERENT
DISTRICT, FROM 1d0 FEET Z'O 70 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCZ'ION OF A WAREHOUSE
AND OFFICE BUILDTNG TO BE ON PP.FZT OF' LOT l, PAP.CEL 30Q, AUDITOR°S SUBDIVISION
$k89, THE S�+lE BL;ING 1305 72ND AVEi�7UE N.F'. , FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY
BRYANT-FRANKLIN CORPOI2F�TlON, 1000 L�'F'ST COUNTY RO�D D, NEW BRIGHTON, MI�ESOTA) :
The City Engineer said that this was a waxehouse - office building and because
of the layout, they feel that it would present a better appearance to face 72nd
Avenue which then requires a variance. The Board of Appeals agreed with them and
felt this layout adds more aesthetic va]_ue to the area than having the loading
docks face 72nd Avenue.
MOTIOiv by Cou-zci_lr.�an ?:^lsha�r fi._n cc�rlc���.r s;i�h c._,._ Bo-_:�' or'. r,p*�e<.1s and g�-ant th�
variance Y�CfUESt:P.C: Dy Pi?'yd?1�-�� :^'�11?1 CO2i�C%�'c1�107;. S�.COriGE'� �y Councilr�ar�
Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Niayor Ki.rkham declared the motion
carried unanimously. .
1`%
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971 PAGE 15
2. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.053, 4A, FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO R�DUCE
THE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 30 FEET TO ALLOW THE CON-
- STRUCTION OF A FRONT ENTRY ONTO EXISTING DWELLING LOCATED ON LOT 9, BLOCK
4, PARKVIEW OAKS 1ST ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 5516 REGIS DRIVE N.E., FRIDLEY,
MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY MR. EDWARD W. FUERSTENBERG, 1319 CIRCLE TERRACE,
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MINNE50TA):
. J.-
MOTION by Councilman Breider to grant the variance as requested by Mr. Edward
Fuerstenberg. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
� •
.�
MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to receive the Minutes of the Board of Appeals
Meeting of November 23, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimausly.
REPORT REGARDING SS&SW PROJECT #105-1 AND CON5IDERATTON OF AWARDING•OF THE
CONTRACT: (Bids Opened Z1:30 A.M., November 15, 1971)
NOTE: Bids listed in Council Minutes of November 15, 1971.
The City Engineer said, as the Council will recall, this award was laid over
at the last meeting because the bids received were highex than the estimate. He
has talked to the contractor to see if there was any way to reduce the cost, but
he has been unable to get a reduction. He said that the letters were went to
a1.1 the affected parties advising them the bid price zs 26a higher than the
estimate. He notea there was one property owner present tonight to give his
views. _ _
� Mr. James A. Leidich of the Learning Tree Day Care Nursery on 53rd Avenue, said
he was still very much in favor of the project and he has talked to Mr. Herringer
and he also still wants the project.
�
�
��
MOTTON by�Councilman Kelshaw to award the bid for Sanitary Sewer and Water
Improvement Project #105, Addendum #1 to Dycon Corporation in the amount of
$22,793.90. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVING PETITION #k26-1971 - REQUESTING A THREE WAY STOP BE INSTALLED AT THE
CORI�TER OF LYRTC LANE AND MADISON STREET:
MOTION by Councilman Breide-r to receive Petition #2�-1971 and instruct the
Administration to install a stop sign on riadison at the intersection with Lyric
Lane. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vo±e, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkham declared the motion carried unanirr,ously.
� RESOLUTION #152-1971 - A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPRUVEi4ENT, APPROVAL OF PI�NS AND
ORDEFtING ADVERTISET�IENT FOR BIDS: WATER, SANITARY S�k'ER AND STORM SEWER PROJECT
#102:
� The City Engineer said this zs for_ inst�_llation cf SP_�r7E.'Y and water utilities in
t�1E' c-lYE'd I70'1"i�.[1 OI= �S'I:OY_21° =:O��a. C%?1 ;??c7!?;� ��r �jI c.i1C�{ 3�� Oi trl° COLl?1C1�_ �iCJ.�.I�C�d ca'LE'
maps of the proposed construction of the projec� as authorized by Council resolution.
�' He said he was prc�posing t� proceed with the pro�ect in stages and on the same
pages also shown is tne first phZSr� OT the work of :he total improvement project,
� �•
��
ii �1
REGUI;AR COUNCiL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971
. PAGE 16 1 �
Ii
,� � but he said he is only suggesting proceeding with this work at this time. He
`' said he wanted to report there was a soil analysis taken, and they found in some
4� cases the peat is 25' - 30' deep which will increase the cost of the utilities. �
� He said his department feels that unless this project is staged, that property
i difficult to develop will go tax forfeit. The first stage is to open Main
-� Street from 79th Avenue to 83rd Avenue and 83rd Avenue from Main Street to -
' T.H. #47. Then ii there is a request for utilities, it would be an easy matter
; to extend the utilities from the mains already in place. He said all the �
legal steps for the improvement have been taken, except for calling for bids.
'� He pointed out that when all the work is done at one time you get a better price,
i
' however, until the property is developed, no one could know exactly where the
i lines should be placed. -
- _ . _. _...
;i _ _ -
; Councilman Liebl asked if there were any objections from the property owners.
' The City Engineer said only one, Mr. Fred Yesnes, all the others have requested
I� the City to qo ahead and they have well over 500. �
� .
� .
'
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Resolution #152-1971. Seconded by Councilman
Breider.
The City Engineer said he would like to say a word about the storm sewers.�
Fridley will not get help from Spring Lake Park, so there cannot be a complete
system put in at this time. He said he proposed staging the installation and
only putting in the pipe where absolutely necessary. If more is put in later, the
system will still fit together. This would Iower the water table as much as
gossible. There will still be a large area of open ditch but it could be piped
later if development dictates. He said he wanted to point out that the ditch
will need continuous maintenance because of the soil. conditions.
Mr. Richard Harris said this seems the best solution to a bad situation and he
hoped future Councils will recognize their problems when the area is developed.
He anticipated problems, especiaZly in parking, because of the ditch.
THE VOTE upon the motion; being a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION #153-1971 - APPROVING THE HIGHWAY LTGHTING MAINTENANGE AGREEMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #I53-197J_, and authorize the
� signing of the agreement. 5econded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham decl��red_the motion c�rried unanimous].y.
,
�
�
��
, � �:
RESOLUTION #154-1971 - UP.GING PARTICIPATION BY METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF THE TWIN
CITIES IN FUNDING A RECODIFICATION OF ALL LOCAL CRIMINAL AND TR.P.E'FIC CODES IN
THE METROPOLITAN AREA-
MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt Resolution #154-1971 and instruct that a
copy of the Resolution be for�,aarded on to the Joint Law Enforcement Council.
Seconded by Council.man Harris. Unon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Kirkriar,i declared tl,e notion carri�cl una:�zmo;�sZy.
, ��
.�;
�
�
�'
�_�.
�
�
�
I,
�
l.
w�
, .:
1
�
�
,
�
�
i � �..
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971
PAGE 17
1�
RESdLUTION #155-1971 - CORRECTING RESOLUTION #17.4-1971 CONFIRMING THE STREET
ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1970-4 (CORRECTING ASSESSMENT ON
LOTS 22 AND 23, BLOCK 7, ONAWAY ADDITION:
MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #155-1971. Seconded by Councilman
Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried unanimously. _�_
APPOINTMENT: (City Employee)
Name Position Effective Date ReplaCes
Ferne M. Insley Secretary November 29, 1971 Sharon K.
1475 15A Street N.W. Assessor's Waldstein
New Brighton, Minn. Office
MOTION by Gouncilman Kelshaw to approve the appointmen� of �'erne Insley to the
position of Secretary in the Assessor's Office. Seconded by Councilman Liebl.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried
unanimously.
CLAIMS:
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to approve payment of General Claims #26979 through
#27131 and Liquor Clai.ms #6156 through #6199. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried
unanimously.
LICENSES•
Multiple DweZZin�s:
Name �
Allen Properties
6629 Clinton Ave.
Minneapolis, Minn.
Otto Tauer
5866 2nd Street N.F.
Fridley, Minn.
General. Contractor
Address
5955-65 3rd St. N.E.
5866 2nd St. N.E
ElView Construction Inc.
7601 73rd Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, Minn.
Inventor!s Engineering, Inc.
7735 BVech Streei: N.E.
Fridley, ��iint:esota
Units
4
�
By: Donald Kutz
�y : EC.,�',`!4Li�l: V�!�Ci.U71
Fee Approved By
10.00 Fire Prev. Bureau
10.00 Fire Prev. Bureau
Building Inspector
Builuing Inspector
�
i �
�
�
,
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971
. � _
LICENSES CONTINUED:
PAGE 18
Roofing . . _ APProved BY
Potvin Sales Company
7341 Commerce Lane N.E. -
Fridley, Minnesota By: Feli.x k�otv�n Building Inspector
MOTION by Councilman Harris to approve the licenses as submitted. Seconded by
Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried unanimously.
ESTIMATES:
� Comstock & Davis, Inc. -
Consulting Engineers
1446 County Road "J" �
� Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
FiNAL Estimate #2 for the furnishing of Professional
� Engineering Services for Planning Sanitary Sewer, Water
and Storm Sewer Project #105
�
1_
,
,
PARTIAL Estimate #2 for the staking out of the construction
work for Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improve-
ment Project #105 from October 4 through Oct. 30, 1971
Dunkley Surfacing Co., Inc.
3756 Grand N.E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421
PARTIAL Estimate #2 for work according to the plans and speci-
fications on Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Improve-
ment Project #103
Bury & Carlson, Inc.
6008 Wayzata Boulevard
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55416
$ 733.33
�
�n
`
$ 1,371.04 ��
.'
$27,292.64
PARTiAL Estimate #3 for work completed and materials on hand
�� this date, acroxdiny to con-tract for Street Imbrovement
Project St. 1970-3 $89,546.42
'; � MOTION by Councilman Breider to approve pa.yment of the estimates as submitted.
Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting ay�, Mayor Kirkham
declared the motion carried unanimously.
COMMUNICATIONS:
I� A. _�GIN CITY TFSTTNG AND ENGTrTEERIr1G I��BOR'�TOR�_', ID?C. • $LASTING LIMITS
C.�� Z'i� F�.IE:: : - ' ,�
. _-____'_____.�
II � NIOTION by Councilman Liebl to receiv� the communication from Z'win City Testing
and Engineering Laborato-ry, Inc. dated Nover�er 22, 1971. Seconded by Council-
man Kelshaw. Upon a voice vo�e, all ayes, the ^+.otion carried unanimously.
',l
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 1971
PAGE 19 �1
B. CHIEF, FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU: PARK COIVSTRUCTIOIQ COMPANY BLAST7NG:
MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to receive the memorandum from f.he Chief of the
Fire Prevention Bureau dated December 2, 1971. Seconded by Councilman Breider.
Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJQURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to adjourn the Meeting. The motion was seconded and
upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried and
the Regular Council Meeting of December 6, 1971 adjourned at 11:35 P.M,
Res ectfully submitted,
�j'G����/
Juel Mercer
Secretary to the City Council
Jack O. Kirkham
Mayor
0
1
1
�
, •
� —
,
,
'
�
1
�J
�
� _�
�
THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 197Z
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Kirkham led the Council and the audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag. ,
�-
Mayor Kirkham called the Special Public Hearing Meeting of December 13, 1971
to order at 7:30 P.M. �
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS A.BSENT:
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Liebl, Harris, Breider, Kelshaw, Kirkham
None
Mayor Kirkham suggested that Item #9.be addedc Receiving Liquor License
Applications from Sandee's Cate, Fridley Recreation and Service Co., and The
Ground Round. �
MOTTON by Councilman Breider to adopt the Agenda as amended. Seconded by
Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT - WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER PROJECT
#102, ADDENDUM #l:
The City Engineer showed the proposed area for improvement on the overhead
projector and Mayor Kirkham asked if there was anyane present that wished to
comment, with no response. The City Engineer said this improvement has been
requested'by alI the property o�aners, with the exception o� Fred Yesnes. By
completing this improvement the area would be opened up so that people will
have physical access to looY at the property. He said he hoped they could
proceed with the improvement early enough to get good bids and get the work
started yet this winter.
MOTION by Councilman Breider to close the Puk�lic Hearing on Water, Sanitary
Sewer and Storm Sewer Improvement Project �102, Addendum #1. Seconded by
Councilman Liebl. Upon a voi.ce vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried unanimous�y and the hearing closed at 7:35 P.M.
RESOLUTION #156-1971 - OP.DERING IMFROVF.P�IENT, FINt1L PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ESTIMATES OF THF. COSTS THERE:OF : WATER, SAN �_TAP.Y SEL�TER AND STORM SEWER
IMPROVEtIENT PROJECT #102, �DENDUi�i �rl:
MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Fesolution #156-1971. Seconded by Councilman
L•iebl. Upon a voice vote, a_ll �yes, hIayor Kir_kham declared the motion carried
unanimously.
i� SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETiNG OF DECEMBER 13, 1971 PAGE 2 �`)
I '
I
PUBLIC HEARTNG ON REZONING RE UEST ZOA #71-08, BY GENERAL REALTY COMPANY TO
REZONE LOTS 16 THROUGH 22, BLOCK 16, HAMTLTON'S ADDITION TO MECHANICSVILLE FROM
R-3 T0 C-2: (GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SERVICE DRIVE OF T.H. #47 NORTH OF
53RD AVEIVUE ) :
The City Engineer showed the area on the overhead projector and said this is
located just south of where Little Dearborn will be Iocated. Their rezoning
_--�
has had a first reading. There are two gas siations operating under an R-3
zoning with a non-conforming use and they are requesting this rezoning so they
will be within the proper zoning. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
Mayar Kirkham asked if there was anyone present in the audience that wished to
be heard, with no comments.
MOTION by Councilman Breider to close, the Public Hearing on the rezoning request
',, by General Realty �ompany. Seconded by Councilman Harris. Upon a voice vote,
all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously and the hearing
closed at 7:37 P.M.
, '
_�
�_J
'
'
PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL PLAT, INNSBRUCK NORTH 2ND ADDITION, BY VIEWCON, INCORPORATED,
P.S. #71-03, FOR PHASE I AND II FOR THE TOWNHOUSE AREA; GENEI2ALLY LOGATED ONE
QUARTER MILE EAST OF MATTERHORN DRIVE AND ONE QUARTER MILE NORTH OF INTERSTATE
#694:
The City Engineer showed the plat to the Council and said the purpose was so
that each townhouse unit would have its own legal description. These are going
to be owner occupied and when sold would be transferred by deed, therefore, they
are defining the lot Iines. There was no one present to commenf. on this item.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to close the Public Hearing an the final plat for
Viewcon, Inc., for Phase I and II for the townhouse area. Seconded by Council-
man Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Ki.rkham d�clared the
motion carried unanimously and the hearing closed at 7:39 P.M.
NOTE: The next item on the agenda was consideration of the Cable Television
Franchise Ordinance, but the Council decided to t�ke this up last to allow
time for anyone to come to the Meeting that wished to be heard.
, RESOLUTION #157-1971 - AUTHORIZING THE CHANGING OF THE BUDGET APPROPRIATTONS
WITHIN THE GENEF2Z�1L FUND, AND AUTHORIZING A TF2ANSFER TO THE LOCKE .LAKE DAM
FUND #104:
,
�
'
, �',
MOTION by Councilrnan Brei_der to adopt P.esolution �157-197�.. Seconded by Council-
man Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried
unanimously.
RESOLUTION #158-1971 - DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY IMPROVEb1,ENT BODNS IN
ACCORDANCE F]ITH LA�^1S OF 1957, CHAPTER 385: (Lccke Lake Improvement Porject #104)
rI0'!'ION by Councilrnaii Br_eZder to auopt F�esolut� on ,-158--1971. Secondecl by Cauncil-
IRdri K21S;7c�iW, t1�70I1 d VO'_CC ;'v�'� ��u_L� _��5� ilc'.��Gi_ e:1L. 1�,�..��=t: V2C��c�cQ Lilt� I�.iOt101"t
carried unanimously.
,� SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, I97� PAGE 3 rL��
I, ' RESOLUTION #159-1971 - DIRECTING THE SALE AND PURCHASE OF TEMPORARY IMPROVF�MENT
BONDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAWS Ok� 1957;"CHAPTER 385: (Locke Lake Improvement
' � Project #104)
MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt Resolution #159-1971. Seconded by
Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION #160-1971 - DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT BONDS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LAWS OF 1957, CHAPTER 385: (SW&SS Project #105)
MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #160-1971. Seconded by Councilman
Breider. Upon a voice vote, a21 ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried
unanimously.
RESOLUTTON #161-1971 - DIRECTING THE SALE AND PURCHASE QF TEMPORAR.Y IMPROVEMENT
BONDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAWS OF 1957, CHAPTER 385: (SW&SS Project #�I05)
i MOTION by Councilman Harris to adopt Resolution #161-1971. Seconded by Council-
i' man Breider. Upon a voice vote, all ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried unanimously.
' .RESOLUTION #162-1971 - DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT BONDS IN
' ACCORDANCE WITH LAWS OF 1957, CHAPTER 385: (1970 Street Improvement Projects)
MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt Resolution #162-1971. Seconded by
�� Councilman Kelshaw. Upon a voice vofe, aII ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared the
motion carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION #163-1971 -. DIRECTING THE SALE AND PURCH.T�SE OF TEMP0�IRY IMPROVEMENT
BONDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAWS OF 1957, CHAPTER 385: (1970 Street Improvement
Projects)
MOTION by Councilman Breider to adopt Resolution #163-1971. Seconded by Council-
man Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, al1 ayes, Mayor Kirkham declared �the motion
carried unanimously.
RECEIVING CONL}IUNICATIONS FROM LIQUOR L7CENSE APPLICANTS: SANDEE'S CAFE, FRIDLEY
RECREATION AND SERVICE COMPANY, AND THE GROUND ROUND:
MOTION by Councilman Harris to receive the commianication from Sandee's Cafe
dated November 23, 1972, Fridley R�creation.and Service Company dated December
10, 1971 and The Ground Round dated December 8, 1971. Seconded by Councilman
Ke l sha�� .
�' The City Manager said that he was open to suggestions on how the Council would
like to proceed furthe�. Councilman Harris said it seemed that at ihis point
there should be some recommendatzon from the staff before Council action is
taken. There are requirements set forth in the ordinance and these guidelines
I, s'�ou�d be followe.d, such as, there is a requirement For a deposit when an
dpU1.�C�zt10ri 1S L1Z12'� OUt. `_':1�iE.' .15 EilS� CU1�� �'-?"1:1C�^Y1� C11ECh1.17'7 �O �° Cj0112
by thu Police D:na.rtr,.��it. T;�e E'zi;a._;ce ^�=��cto-r saicl t:�at fie:•�a�d Joi�n�Gn's
(The Ground Round) dic.' file a fonzlal application, but they did not deposit
I' any money. The City Nlanager pointed out that in the letters he sent out, he
had asked for porposals rather than appl�ca.t�ons.
I '
� ���
SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 1971 PAGE 4
' _...
i`
r_
'
�
�
'
�
'
s
r
�
�
I� ,
�
Councilman Liebl said that when the people of Fridley were asked to vote on
private on-saZe 2iquor, there was a committee formed to set out the criteria.
They set up certain basic rules the Council were supposed to follow, There are
only three licenses to give out, there are four applicants, including the Fire-
side Rice Bowl, and the Council has already made certain commitments to the
Fireside Ri.ce Bowl. There has also been one license set aside for a motel/hotel
type of accommodation. The Council must look toward the amount of investment
they would be likely to bring in, and the applicants must be screened very
thoroughly. Mayor Kirkham suggested these communications be received tonight
and the City Manager be asked to research the ordinance to see what provisions
they would have to meet. Councilman Liebl asked that the new Council taking over
in January be given the responsibility of making this decision, as there is not
time now to consider th�m properiy. Councilman Harris said it was a matter of
procedure. This Council cannot act until the guidelines set out in the ordinance
are met, including the extensive checks that have to be made and the deposits
by the applicants.
MOTION AMENDED by Councilman Liebl to turn these applications over to the
Administration for proper processing. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw. The vote
upon the amendment being a voice vote, all vo�irig aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the
amendment carried unanimously.
THE VOTE ON THE MOTION to receive the communications, being a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
ORDINANCE #496 - CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE ORDINANCE:
Mayor Kirkham asked the audience if there was anyone that wished to make any
further suggestions, with no one responding.
Councilman Liebl asked the City Manager what his recommendation was in regard to
the reduced monthly service charge for the senior citizens. The City-Manager
said that this was a determination properly made by the Council, however he knew
that in Austin, their regular monthly charge to a subscribex is $6.00 and the
senior citizens pay $5.00. He said he had not surveyed a great number of ordinances
in this regard. It may be the Council would prefer a lesser discount that the 500
contained in the ordinance. He pointed out that he had added an income ceiling
of $5,000 in order to qualify. Mayor Kirkham said he would suggest a discount of
20%, and added that the Federal agencies ar_e going to direct the airlines to
discontinue their special rates for �he senior citizens and students on the grounds
they are discriminatory. The City I�Ianager said he had not researched the legal
implications. It may be that this is the start of a nunber o£ challenges
against the reduced rate cer.tain classific�tions of people enjoy.
MOTION by Councilman K�lshaw to amend the Ordinance, Section 22, Rates, B,6, to
change the monthly service reduction for senior citizens from 50o to 20% of the
regular monthly rate charged other subscribers.
T'�A rity Manager_ reported that General Televi.sion of Minnesota, Incornorated
indicated to h�m that tn� 50�� red�lction „as rath�,� steep, hut they woul.d certainly
not objec� to u 20°s r���iuction. Cc��.:.cil.n..�. ��i�bl sa__d 'n�� ielt tnac the senior
citizens should be given as Many breaks as possible:, and suggested a 25% re-
duction. Mapor Kir}cham pointed out tha.t he knew cf no other mode of communi-
cations, such as ne�•�spapers or magazines, that offer such a reduction. Council-
man Breider comTnen±ed that he would like to see the 50°o stay, but would agree
to the 25a�.
II '
I '
'
'
�
SPECIAL PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 1971
MOTION WITHDRAWN by Councilman Kelshaw.
��
PAGE 5
MOTION by Councilman Kelshaw to amend the Ordinance, 'Section 22, R.ates, B, 6,
to change the monthly service rate for senior citizens from 50% to 250 of the
regular monthly rate charged other subscribers. Seconded by Councilman Liebl.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried
unanimously. ,. _
MOTION by Councilman Liebl to adopt Ordinance #496 on second reading, waive the
reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Kelshaw.
' The City Attorney advised that the amendments and changes that have been made
since the first reading of the ordinance be adopted by motion of the Council
and to have them listed in the Minutes.
�
�
'
�
�I
'
'
[l
'
�
'
'
MOTION.by Councilman Kelshaw to adopt the amendments and changes to Ordinance
#496 since the first reading and entitle them "Exhibit A", as fol].ows:
Page 1 The name GENERAL TELEVISION OF MINNESOTA, INC. and the phrase, "AND
CODIFYING SAID ORDINANCE AS CHAPTER 10 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE"
have been added to the title of the Ordinance.
Page 13 (Section 14,D)...Changed "make available to the City Engineer on his
demancZ" to "shall provide to the City a current map".
Page 26 (Section 19,F)...Added number "27" television channels.
Page 28 (Section'22,A)...Wording of Rate Section has been reworded and now
includes the statement, "Not to exceed $7.50".
Page 29 (Section 22,B)...The amount of service charge rates has been
included, and the Multiple Family Dwelling rate (5-19 Unit rate)
has been changed to $4.75.
Page 30 (Section 2?_,6)...The Senior Citizen Rate has been added.
Page 31 (Section 22,E)...The heading has been changed from "Cablecasting
Rates" to "Cablecasting Rates For All Educational, Library, Govern-
mental and Non-Profit Community Organization Users".
Page 35 (Section 27,F)...The wording has beer. changed from "Before providing
antenna service to any subscriber., the cor�pin1 shall obtain a
signed contract from the suhscra.ber contazning tne provisions
substantially as follows: Subscriber understands that in providing
antenna service, the company is making use of public right-of-way
within the City of Fridley and that the continued use of such
right-of-way is in no F,ay guaranteed, In the event the continued
use of such rights-of-way is denied to company for any reason,
com.pany ��rill r��l�e �,ery r�.asonab? �.��ort to provide service over
d1.��Y'� d�F' 2"012�C'.S. 577�^�� _?. ,_.� �„ _.. (_<? 'v]s il Ii12'.C' T20 Cl�i ii1 72CC
unde�-take uny act�.un again.t +�ile City oz F'ridley, its officers,
or its employees if the seYvice to be provided hereu�der is inter-
rupted or discontinued. The form oi the eor,�pany's contract with the
��
2�
' SPECIAL'PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 1971 PAGE 6 .
��
�
'
`'
��
,
�
�
�
�
,
'
'
'
�
�'
U
'
n� q
LJ
subscriber shall be subject ta approval�of the City of Fridley with
respect to the inclusion of this provision." CHANGED TO READ:
"Before providing antenna service to any subscriber, the company
shall notify subscribers in writing that the company is making use
of the public right-of-way in Fridley to provide Cable Television
Service; that use of such rights-of-way is in no way guaranteed;
that in the event continued use of such rights-of-way are denied
for any reasons, the company will make every reasonable effort to
provide service over alternate routes and that the City of Fridley,
its officers and its employees are not responsible in any way for
any interruptions or discontinuance of service".
Page 35 (Section 27,J)...The following phrase has been added: ",provided
that the subscriber shall sign a release holding the City of Fridley
and the company harmless and without liability of any nature if
removal is requested".
Page 36 (Section 28)...The number of inembers (5} and the length of their
terms have been added. Alsa the phrase: "Committee members to be
appointed by majority of Council".
THE MOTION seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried unanimously.
THE VOTE UPON THE MOTION to adopt Ordinance #496, bei.ng a roll call vote,
Kirkham, Liebl, Harris, Breider and Kelshaw voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared
the mo�ion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Harris to instruct the City Manager to contact General
Television of Minneso4a, Inc. and advise them the Ordinance has been passed on
second reading and that they must approve it, and signi�y their approval by their
signature. Seconded by Councilman Liebl. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Kirkham declared the motion carried uannimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTTON by Councilman Rreider to adjourn the Meeting. Seconded by Counczlman
Kelshaw. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Kirkham declared the motion
carried unanimously and the Special Public Hearing Meeting of December 13, 1971
adjourned at 8:00 P.M.
Resnectfu'_ly submittecl,
��;/ �� ✓� �-'�-�"" �
�J el Mercer
Secretary to the City Council
Jack O. Kirkham
Mayor
�
� �
�
.�
�
�
� �
�
�
�
'
'
i
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
December 17, 1971
�_
MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COiiNCIL
SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL
At your meeting of November 15, 1971, you received a report from Paul Brown,
Park and Recreation Director, giving some general information regarding a municipal
swimming pool for Fridley (copy of that report is attached), In Mr.�Brown's report
he indicates that total construction cost for the poal, including bathhouse, parking
lot, and a11 accessories, is $600,000. To this bond interest in the amount of
$409,500 (based at 6.5% interest over 20 years) must be added, based on the assump-
tion that a pool would be financed through a municipal bond issue. This would
amount to approximately $50,475 a year to retire the interest and bonds indebtedness.
The second question that the Council posed was the desire to see operating
' statements from pools of other cities. Enclosed is the operating statement for
Valley View Outdoor Swimming Pool in Bloomi.ngton, which is one of two mureicipal
pools operated by the City. You will note on the statement that approximately
$7,329 was needed to balance the operation over revenue received. You will also
note that initial construction and debt service are excluded from this statement.
If the Council is interested in pursuing the development of a plan for a
municipal swimming pool, it could ask the Parks Gnd Recreation Commission and the
Admznistration to come up with a plan to present to the City Council, -This plan,
as z envision, would include the following:
(a} Does Fridley need a municipal pool?
(b) Recommend site(s) for the pool.
(c) Conceptual scheme for size of pool and fucilities.
(d) Anticipated use of the pool and whether it should be an indoor pool,
an outdoor pool or a combination.
(e) Recommend financing plans for bui.lding of ttie fac.ility.
GRD/ms
' Enclosures
CC: Park and Recreation Director
Park and Rec.�eat; on Co��si.issien
��
'i 1 ``:
Ve�ry zespcctfully,
l.' t � �'/-1` ,
•:��=;.f�'tG�.�C�- vCC,I.`-�J
GeraTd R. Davis
City riana� cr
� �_
�'; � . .
�; .
�t � .
;�
�
; �
IN
: �
�:
r �: � : .� � :
� �
�� T� �j ii 1� � ��� �
� � �
�; ' T0; City Manager
�
i;
�� S
i i¢�
�
i�
, �
i
�
� ��
� —
� .
�
�
� .
�
r
�
�
� G,
G �
��
- CITY OF FRIDLEY �
6431 University Avenue N.E.
` Fridley, Minnesota 55432
PA(�L BR�LUN, V.vicec.ton
Phone: 560-3450 X64 �
MEMORANDU�I
_.����.�.��.��
, } DAT�: November 10, 1971
�
UBJ�CT: Municipal Swimming Pool for Fridley. FROM: Paul Brown,�birector
� # ir # ir iE # � iF # # # dF 3P # # # # # # ib # # # iF # # # iF iE # ii i5 3f � if ii �'r iE ii
Dear Mr. Davis: ' � . '
The following information is submitted far your information, in respect
io your Memo dated October 19, 1971.
This information is for your review, regarding the possibility of a
Municipal Swimming Pool i_n Fridley. Please note that some of the information
has been rec{uested by way of mail from communities that already have pools in
operation.
1. Bloomington Pool - P�ritten requests have been made for this
information. Enclosed is a map o£ the pool and surrounding
- area . .. • -
r, �-- -
2. Cost Estimates:
� a. Bathhouse caas included in,my estimate .,.,,$150,OOO.QO
b. Paol - Equipment - Accessori.es -- �e'alki�rays . . . $400,000.00
and Accessories -
c. ParkinU Lat (Cost) . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5Q,000.00 �
d. Land = Sliould be .placed on currently oti�rned '
Park Land within Fridley . . . . . . . . . . . � ,00
ESTIAi�\TED TOT:\I., : . .' . . . . . . . $600, 000 . 00
3, hlethod of Payment - tt'ritten rec{uests have been made for this information,
Requests titi�ere made from Edina, Bloomin�ton, Crvst�l, and Prooklyn Center. �
4. Y.h1.C.A. Information: �
Their pool, if collstructed �'rori their studie� ard surve��s, ��i_Il be an
lI1C�00T T)001. �j}i::1.T I100� ;i<l.:.jCi �'i iV° ^:i? f'�'� ��•�.?. t0 c:';l:' C�.^`7I'C;: OTl 2-rlb'
IllUil] �.l�;�il L)001_ . i�lE(1;�.. ��.� _l ._.il ;.L�?Ci '_il"i�� ,.i1, L. ��00� 6vOtli�Ci bC UJ..CI� by'
membexs 0�,'I.Y �nd net op�n to the �ener,�7 pt:bJic. �
5. User� Fees and Cliarges: Exa:,�ples 0,'�`LY �
Tic}:ets: Season Patro:l 1'� cket (R�sic'ent a:�d \'orl-I�esidei�t) .�
Individt�al . . �;,Op,�c�ci:
Family . . . . �10.00/Fa:n?ly �
: . _ -�
��� Municipal Sw3mming Pool for Fridley Page 2 ��
;� S. User Fees and Charges (Continued): •
Daily Fees: ,
Student . . . $ .25/each
Adul�t . . . . $ .50/each �
.
I�
� r
Locker Rental . . $ .35/each .
�;` � NOTE: Non-Resident Fees, if desired, should be higher.
��
.
.
�± � Estimated Budget Costs (2 types -- Summer ONLY or Full Year Program)
S!J[�II�IER ONLY: (Based on 90 day season)
' Personal Services . . . $ 25,000.00
r , . . . . . . . . . . . $ 34,000.00
Other Expenses
{ .
: 59,000.00 .
I, �' FULL YEAR PROGRAM: (Based on 270 day season) :
Personal Services . . . . . . . . . $ 80�,000.00
Other Expenses . . . . . . . . . . $ 52,000.00
�
� 132,000.00
� � This basic information is estimated by the City of Fridley, Parks and Recreation
Department.
Respectfully submitted,
�! ,
� f t•�'i---t��:.� � ; • �� .
� � 4:-�.�_..._
PAIIY; BROtiVN, Directoi �'"
� .__.�--Parks � Recreation Department
� PB:cs _'-i - .. ° -
� ,
� , � .
�
' �
�
� � � ��
�� � .� �I
—.:�. � �� _ . _�
.. . _
, , . .. . , . .., .. _. .
_ _ -.._ ._._ _ �...,.�
{ , _ ' . . ' City of Bloomington �'� ��.
� • . PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMEN1' �_� I� c,�
r� , . �
� � HUBERT OT�SON JUNIOR HIGH SCHO�L POOL ,
_ 4551 West 102nd Street
,
rGALL Y ' f
� � *�� 1968 ��s� _
--- = -.
SF'i L' ,
. � � P 0.
� . . . . _. �
� . . .
. 4�.
� ' .. . - '- N .
SL'N DE�K ��
' / - .
� �
' /
, / W E
i
/
� � ING
� .� � / P00
� S
. , �
� �� ' ` "
� _ - -
� � GENERAL INFORr1ATI0�V� ��tal Ccst - $353,000
B�ilt - 1967
� Nu:t:ber of La.^_es - 8
�
+ -r t t
Ul:il;;.�?Sl�?'•.S '- SCJ1Ili:i?Lr!�, �:�01 -- i S X 5Qi �
� wadi.n� pool __�-� 40' x 20'
Nu�nber vf Ga11��ns oE ��<_ter :3�0,000
�chloriae used ir_ scairiminb poel; bro7�ine in saadino pool)
� Seating Capacity� - 450 '
15' deck space arou�d pool �
, ? -- c��e meter di�-in.g bo�7-ds
� � 1G' e�e� .,_ _.,�_ . 3: �.�ial.'o-. ,'
� , _ , : , _ e : -.
�
� �_, ' •
I� ,
� � ��r �; �/ ��
T
_. _ .�_ ..._.,. _ _ . _
. .
.�:
_. ---. _.
, ___
�_.. . ,,_ __ �.
Swi.mining Instructions �
� � • . . `"
Swimming instructions are oftered to children at least 52" tall, or going ��
� into 4th grade. Red Cross certified instructors teach beginners, advanced .
beginn.ers, intermedi�tes, and swimmers. Three 3-week sessions are otfered
with classes being 1-hour long. In order for a child to take any class
� beyond Beginr_er he must complete the requirements for the preceding course.
Total Cost for 15 lesso�s is $5.00 per session. Transportion not provided.
�
�
�
�,
�
� '
��
�i
� �,
C7.ASSES OFFERED SUNii 1ER 1968
SESSIONS PERIOD A PERIOD B PERIOD C PERIOD D
(I) g-g AM 9-IO AM 1Q-11 AM 11-12 noon
�Juae 10- Jur_e 28 Beg�nner & Beginner & Beginner & Beginner &
I!?termediate Adv. Be . Swimmer Intermed.
(II) Beginner & Beginner & Beginner & Beginner &
July 1- Jul 19 Adv. Be . Intermed. Adv. Be . Swimmer
(III) Begi.nner & Beginner & $eginner & �eginner &
Jul 22 - Au st 9 Swimmer Adv, Be . Intermed: Adv. Be .
�
Public Swimmi�
HQURB: 1-5 & 6-9 Daily
. �
Public Swimmir�° Every afternoon ar3 evening.the pool coi11 be open_to
reside^ts of Bloeming for public scoimming, There will be three
sessions per day -- 1a00-3.00 P,1; 3�00-5:00 PM; and 6:00-9:00 PM,
Admissio*i is 50;: per p�rson per session. Any non-swimmer attendi.ng
t�.hese sessio�.s musr be at least 52" tall. _
Famil Nightso Each Tuesday a!?d Thursday evening from 6:00-9:00 PM
will be set aside for family s�:�immin;. Children under lb years
of age rnust be accompaniec? by L-heir parents to attend the family
night st•�ims. •
Wading Poo1.a The t•;adi?.g AO�1 c•�ill be op�n for t��o sessions -- 1:00-5:00 P:1
and 6.00-9:00 rii. for the children not t�l.l enouoh to ent2r the bi.g
pool. Admissior is 25� per chi.ld per session.
�11 persons us5ng th: pool r:�ust provide ttt�.i.r oc,�n batiling suits, to:��el, etc.
.�
�
CITy' OF PsL00?�i1�1��G`�'Oi�i' s P�i I:i�J.��)�:SO`lA �
}'�^i��: A:�;� iZI,Ci:Lt`�T10:v D;:P��C:7'�:,l.;�IT
VALl�T,S' V�_�_<,',2 GUTDO^�� Stvl;i,i,i:1:I�G y0J7,
�irs� leur of Cper�:t.ioii - C<ler�d� r 1'e.at- J.977_
Revenue
�Cilii:tSS 10I1 `:
SC'? `iOli 1 ]_C't:� �-;� �-� �
si_ii;;J_, n�1;��i�s �.c:;�s
Instruct ie_�al Le.;son I'��;
Locker 3:en�_aIs
�I�Oi:�il_ �C'_VEIlU['. �7� �
Ex�,etid i t:u�_�s i3)
Per.�or;.a1. S�^rv �.ces
Opez�tt-.1_ll.; CoSi`s ��`�
Ot1�er E.;l�eu�e�s
C��>>it.�]_ Uu'_la.}>
Total F:xne„c?;_tc-, e:
��t �'=�>���,_�z�„ c_,_>�_
$21,675.G3
_ �.� y 7�F_`). �,�
$3�9��,� �-
� v �., . �r _,
9,83G.1.2
IS��:?..�J_
___ 2, 0' 4. 3 ��_
$3S,92U.8?
3,855.50
5%4.�;0
$��35350.72
$S0,E,79.7?
$C7,31S'.0;�)
��_} S^_<�O1'. �;c:Ec��,c c Y: cli•.Ci�?>t.CCt c_�: ttl.L<:. p7tf:(�Opi- ��QO� c1�1Ci. OU.1" 11'i(if),^,�':'
F)O�i�.y 1t �E?i C� .!1��'_:i�?��y� t._ L1L011i <,"i 'C:�� 8. � l:- .GI, C��_�L ,. L�CI :IC'
.� ` �; �' `'
f01"iil� t:liE' I'E:J'E !�'.0 ll.f�:.ti�c�:l c� _)l�' CO1'tS:ISi:� Of tC�'U't'1?l.'t'Ci;: 01_
Tf'.rf'7.l' :� fiU?1 ....c.i7i'� t�lC.�_.'t. ;;:L�_G5i �lu.._:'_� 11��1J' �t �'.7l"'CI��Ci�Sll?�..
F1�..7 U� !1`L.�10'l }�i �',. _�.il i?:�_ i_F;�') 1`-`. ��u, i.i<)O� L.
. ,
�. :. ,. _ �. _ .._ _. . „ , ,. .,
COr-CE.,_�_.�.-� --� Ci -i<ilE.c. 1�`, £i SC��< _;.iii C'-. ---__. t_ o_.'.� Tc��)O]'I�C�'
1.P__�'��Elt�� _.111_) �' ._ �.YOS,� T_ � .�:'t11_1C � , � ��_ „. _L1F
�3� liiJ1�I_��. CO;I:.:l:LltC'ti1C�i]. ?t1C Cl'2.�iL S:'.7�V_t.�'C c"1f'C E'.nC�_ll�c"`Cl.
��{� Ji1�.711': _ _ O?7� F�.0 _ �: '.t�_ �.� , l, i"�." ._ .^7'}.'l CE' `;'..;7 �.!?�' ':LC'%'ZS.
i���� 1TI1S;=l�&t !�'C Ct:�`_�L�� 0�.::C'I' t�-`-., 1'C�?ilOi] .�'�Ci-� I_CCS� 1_l?l_ti�_C'il^RCa_'
C C! (; £. � � C - � . _ �' � " _ . :' Et � . _'. � . _ _ :' i � �� :� i . � ,' � � : ,. .
33
.. l, ��.
� � /i �"
� ORUINA�iCE N0. / �/
IAN O�i��NA�iCE TO A1�1END TfIE CITX CODE 0"F THE CITY QF
�RIDLEX, ��INNESOTA BY MAKZNG A CH�INGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS.
�
The Council o� the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1.
SECTION 2.
I ( r
Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is an�ended
as hexe�nafter �ndi.cated.
The tract ox area within the County of Anoka and
the City of Fxidley and described as:
All o� the Noxth 750 feet o£ the West 600 feet of the
Noxtheast Quaxter (NE 1/4) of the Northwest Quarter
(Nt� 1/4) o� Section 12, T-30, R-24, County of Anoka,
State of Minnesata, generally lying East of �
Highway #65 and South o£ Osborne Road.
Is hereby desi.gnated to be in the Zoned District
knawn as C-2S (general business areas).
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change
�� the o£fic�.al zoning map to show said tract or area
�xom zoned district M-1 (light industrial areas)
to C-2S (genexal business areas).
34
� PASSED BY THE CITX COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP FRIDLEY THIS
�� �j'
� � DAY OF � ���J ` � , 1971.
� -_ - _
� - - - -
- M�YO�'. Jacic � . nirkham
ATTEST:
CITY CLERk �Iaxvin C. Brunsell
� Public Hearing: Nov. 8, 1971 (Continued) Dec. 6, 1971 (Closed)
First Readinb:�elrl�er �, 1_�
S e c o n d R e a d i_ n —,,�,-- o----'`--7 �---
i � � _t .�
Pubiish........-- - —
il �
�i
�
� ._
��
�
�—
�T . ._ :- �,- �-
�, t ,'
� t..,��i��%� � SJ ;s ;�
^ � � �i
^ .
� �
.♦ ry
^ %�% %�1 �I.
;, �9 d��l ! ( �� �
_ , �,
. . - =` ' ^ - ' ..- R
1 1
. . �
� .%c- S '
. �°,': . _.�'�'.,.. ..: �Ti'1%'j _
� � �
� 1
�
I i
_ . ..
--�- -- -�- ---- _ � _--- ---- - �
�
.. . ..__> - -J'^-'�.: . 4 ,
. , �J � _ f 2' � . ��':�'�.
I
+
3S
�
�---�� � � ,Zo
.._,...:..:� _ _ _ _.�„ . �
zs�o� �-L1 M! T Of C!�
h erm an// O f' j
: a,� L Ha.oson � .
N,
� �ou�n� A�.Y C� �
� M ' ISfiZ ON1i116
I
--- a Bo------� � � .. ��. �. R ii G'� t) � S f
(2550� �
�:/far G Ou:.nerfe
� � FOO -' I � . .
- ---.- '...._. -- - - '- --- �----- ----'-------t � �
n �^ /
(?, �.�,u�, �� `a���'C IAL 1!$¢, ffa„nsT K�.^4'�' ,"'x 'bi. Anders ?¢rvcln�
. ... �.+ o . w �..60G3:. aa v .� � �rw �- 4 . � . y �
. . . _ . r"no .._ . .. _ _ .--._ ---.. .= Ij . � . � -
I
� _ i�26so� � . - - .
/LJi%f:.+�Ciuime�`fe�'L�O �iood
...._ . _. .__-...._ .._-----._ . . __-'— . '��. � .
. - �M . �'rz . . .
, � � � � L7S0,� .
� �' O�� Re� />y Co��. �G ; i
` J
� �i� I"�"� l I�G. . �� . j �Z- � .�� �
, � � ! i. . . � V%r0// r�CG, "s. : n:
I ' 'l
�
1 �
� �. �.._� ..���.���.�.�.�.� �
;� _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ __ ________ _ _� _
� �.� .
___ __ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______ _ _ __ . _____ ___
� _ ___ __ .__ ___ ___ _ _ _ ,
1C , � , 6 n
� ='i �1BS0) !265�/
� ,�' � �
� �� � .
: »�
. � ``� _ . , �
E � � _. f,� aoo � . ��� _ _ _ __
.� � . �
. �,.,,. �, �
� ��. � � '���o _ ���:� � � I
, ^ 'ei.�.��'
i Z1�S�;
l.J ���' a�6e , �oo j
., ^ -c
; f � �' � , !4200
. �'• - - -- --- --- __ - � , f'1.�%tv,� ri p�vm effC , / _
� � �,� ' /4_3So � i .
' � � �.✓ r� .., ._ � .
t
I � �
� �____
v � �,,
I � `
�— , _ "' _ _ _ . _ __ _ _ _ _
� � � � _ i��.s:
't�'----===- _ _ _ - - - ; r
' �. � __�___
l.i.J � .
I
�
.
; t .
� ,
�
�r� ��� �
�.
ORDINANCE N0. �
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as
hereinafter indicated.
SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the
City of Fridley and described as:
Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, Block 13,
flamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville, lying
in the South Half of Section 23, T-30, R-24,
City of Fridley, County of Anoka,
Minnesota,
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District
known as C-2 (general business areas).
SECTION 3. �That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change
the official zoning map to show said tract or area
to be rezoned from Zoned bistrict R-3 (general
multiple family dwellings) to C-2 (general business
� � areas).
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1972.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell
Public Hearing: D cember 13, 1971
Firs t P.eading .__ `�"`�_T+� -
Second Reading.
Publish........
MAYOR -
/ �.
� ; �,; -'�
_�-� _ � i
1�
, -
3�j - �
---�_ -
. . . _ _ _ _ . __ _ �
� � , � , �, ,.. ' :� �.. _ - ---- r= • v �,y
i , _ _ ,r •,�' •,:
� I +� /Je Sa � s•Xp . ' �.+t � 1�-
I • • ' ' I "" '_ \ n..%(�. li�l !o ; y % I 7J� � !.:l.. . .
_ , �' \\ � _�.'c .�r, - — / � �. 3� ' f - ` �� „
.. � � � I 1 , ,� a � � ---- -=- .
_
, .. ,
I : , � � - - -- -� � -- -_ •- � ���� ° �_._�._. v � ?:'4 � 3 Z �
` i / i i h � .. �
,., .
. . ,-,•. -
e
� � . � , �
� '. i �'' � i (' i � � � � . - �� ° � -- �� ` J --- � � f
� • ------^F-----� �---�\� - : �\
, I . . . �� .
� � � � • �• t i ` I I �_ �- - ..._ :. � T� � '�
, ' ' I - -----� ._ ' - _--- �- -- -� ��" _
� . � ,� i- _ ... .r j` �% � --S _._
, i�. _° ZOA ��71-08: General Realty Co. - ��.��`b���'�~, , ';
,- _- ; �:1''___ Orig• L. 20, 21, 22 Hamilton's Add. :�, . ._�� '� , 1q„-_
_ __ _ _ — _ _ �; _ _ to Mechanicsville. r �, _ g_ 4 �� ��
-� '�
- - 16-19. to P.H. notice , �� ,
i
- : �• __ ; -- Added L. i . , (
,�, , 'r ; � ��. _ •i�' 9 �, � � �z
..
,� � , i� � � --- �o ' � ��i - �
,:�-=-� ------------ —.... - - - . - '
isa' -- . . �____� T � � � � ----�_�„�_ �� .
� is „ ., . .� , ?' „ =I 1�__ _-�-�- i I' ��"'�-�
� � �..�_ �1� .^ �-_--- _ � ' I� 4':' �t' �... 'i �_:;,9� 'I �z---%t0 1 _�_ ��-` i �\. - -
, � Y � I � > > _ � _ , �� '� " ;3 , '•• .
�"'� �--- - .-t-.-_ * �;�_ ' r- - ~ � -� r- �-- -= r- -� 1- - - - -� (��� _ - �
, � � i�,• � �T--�-�:�__a� ,_�� ::» .I �: i • h z�N i..J 1 �2i
_'7l1-,�-'-� _"-, .__.-� .�` I `�' I I�`_ _ t� � �e .' -�1 tl� ';J __�t�==� _�!_-._. _ ....�;= _ � _= ; S�_ _�"..
� �"' .�. ' - �- - •- -�- � I_ _ _ - 1 i e -'V ` oI ': _--•._ . `,�' _ �=_:_ . ; !� ,
i �� '1� � "�� ;o F � a � q ;,� � r _ 4 � i jy � -' � -.-.
, � '- j = � - - - . - - -- :�- - --- - - +�'- __ `•f= ~I '_ _ i3t+�d -a- -'''�'' � F - =�-e= :
�
�
/d0.4J �I �` �/ 45 �, ,
""""""""'"'."""_'- i /�
I ...=� . ' "'!"'I":v"""""„"""""_' """"_"'_""_""' �.�.�I� / ""'a"".
/�% 6S %+ 'iC. � �
I1 +�. if. F�� id �f��
;z � � � � ; I , r� -i3e:�S --� i- -Teo.-fS w, -;�rRr���.,�� _.i:e_is �� ^��. ^'vts .5e.o �� � � �is _.
�+ , � � � - -'��- - -� r- - --�- - �� l4; 3a / � a::`�3� � �� � .�o
{ � + `, - - . _.
.. .
, �
I
� � j � _ _�`.' - Y� t�- - G-- _ �i �_,2� -� ! -z-- Q f ��l 19 � a 1 � v �-__'29_- �
j' . �2 '^ °j'= _� ZB 3 za ?�..�J t 2s
: - - - - - .,
� �-. _
° , � ';_ _ _ _ .. : ; _ z� q j z' __ -- ¢ J- - --- ?' '
�� �. t.
� z�
- s
... . zc
. . . .. ..
: . , _ .
.
= � ` ` _ _..- --- ---_ ` ---�
� � �` z�
y t ` ': � . -- --2s e. 6 n I .l ��
'., �'- I ' L _ - - _ -'- - - - - - - —� ,�,� -- i z - �-` 6 ___ ; —� -=
i
. . � �`
.
. .. I .i• �
I ._ , . � .` 7 ,
� � .
I , � ' ° ---- --- "-=°- - � -24 i` _ 7�4
, I �I. '� l <f; ,- -
i
,':
. '�,>: .�.
.
�
_ __� ,
00 ' g 9 .
a' - � ..__ 1 B ,
�,°. �.� -� ; �,- - - - - �� - - - �' --- - � �•�� z� �.
; : ,,�/� ,: .. , _y�_� - --------
I : ., , �� � � � , : � ��Y
� �<. : ., t,Z 9 . ,2p � !j , Q
IZ �� �i � � � , %.', 12
. _.
� , , y : I ,- -_- - -t � � :_ -- - qzi_ _-_ __ �o- �"�` ,r T_ i ____ __.
: _ .
�,•° ' _ _ � f _ � Z/ \ . . •/o . � 2< .
� ' �� � � � ` . . : �' � -- --� ' --�-- __ ___ --- -
• t ..> f 2o ii , zo v,� �: >i ., Zo
1 . �� � t �. - - - - -- � i - - , .
' i:Q. - a � � L , : �: �' ; /d ; �•,? � ' _ ; ` �Y' -•. ---- '------ -
\
'�.� . .. �,. � I- - - - - -� r - — �5 __/9 . ` /Z : /9 /1 � , �y ,
I - � /� lj t
i JO - � t � � , �' iC'- - i , !� /3 ---- ---A- A
.
, �
' �. � � e8 ' : i3
t a �j y� e� . , r' _�J !• _ _ .__
i�
�
,� � • 1 f , ' '1-- ,��• � _ � � /� _ f f.:��� /� _E �A` � �, /`�' Z /'/ ,
9 ' _ _ n �. -- f a ! �-;-,-- -- - �� ---
� • �
II �` � �,\ '''.fj .o� 1 I � . � �3e �a _i3e�7e ��/1 a S ��`Je ��,,C•c ''. % 6^: � `r V % • �: EG v° '•: ��6in � .�P �r.p Q =� o !;�'YO-
k �" e ' ' ! � � � c" r' � �' �- -- - - -- - � - - ` ..�.
-, � „ I � 6�1�,� M.� J p p--•
� ' e sf �,,f'.t I � �' � ,� e� r I 9"�, ir • ,�--5'S/ e� � 3;. i�.
- F(C. � ��..5� � �. i `.'° 1� iloJ� v. �'! 7O ^ ;• .'=o.?o /io.7o' q ' -%? .70 � /.�0.70_-_ ``i:vJO
' ' ' � Uj
� _ ' R t� . i� " / �
; ' `E � ,: �- I ---"f`- - - .!. _ _^ . = _ .�° _ _ --�----� � �-'-30-- - / ry� � �
� �� i �' O .: 2 .. n � o .Z �r
I ; �'��-r. /r. � `Ili?f�,*Z . � \ i , � �o-_ _ -r--- � _ ___ � i �. �' Z9 -- �. `� �=+.� o —29___? � _ � _ � �• n_._?9 . y
� •i':e i ° '�� �' � ' � �� - - - --- � `'^- ?6 ` 9 li� = Zg 3 t.� 28
� � c:' e ! o ` � 17 - --- �� --- - - - - ..� - ----•- - -
-� �F • � c c � s. � -'� , , � .27 . � ,Q
, ,- � � z� z� .
,:s ;::f41 � ,, � ;�� 1,,. , � ; �: - - - -- - --Z� - – — s — _ _ _ . _ - -_ _-
y,;. � � � �J`: ; 26 . 5
f �.1
' f � f � � n �'A ' � � -- - - - -- --- -- - � -- -- z6 ----,�--- - ZL _-
� �--
� � '�i , : :�
�. , a ��,e-. i , 2s zs : zs 6
_ .
, � rr �tti . ,�df=': J F � __,__� __ � _" _ _.____ _ _ ' zS
` � �Il s`� I � :I , �� � �� % ' _...___' �__ _. . ..__.-.
. , `
' � v , . '
w - - • - v � _ . ti ; �' � I = 1i `'i � � y: _.. 7 �� ` '24 • . T � ,= -^ 24 .
+ - - � y • ? ` �. / 1' � -� - - �-- Z j - _ f .� 8 - `.' '=� --- -- - _ _ �
�r N ��
� C
'vz
I :� •-t l"�r _- � - rF��:.- �,-» iv ��.i I c � ?7 •.,..% s.�' --9 -- -- - --- � �'� ------- --�j- t�� - 8 _.- 2i
-..n c.-x �
_ . . : . : , --._ -
;^ � ^ � + � �� — I : ----- _- _ __. . 2z 9 : zz 9 . �r
., � _
� � � 1 so ��.. --- -- ---- -- _�___ .
� � __... . __.. . _
� �
; � ; : z� �o
_ uc �� --- -- ias., - ., Z/ /o i 2/ �o .
I � wH'i�'";� N (,.i NP9'i. 'w ' �',. I ' _.-._-. _ ____... ...__ _ .. ___ . . _.._.... .._ _._.__ � �_" � '_ %I ' _'_.
.�2 ti � w �7 �' .� ' �1 � ZO _ /� .-__ __' �O �� ZO t /� 10
�
' � � I . I '^ --- - --
i ', __ iro _Y,s.. i�c�q_ i^° ' v, ) /9 __ - /1 �� -----/9-- —�Z— -/9 -
. ., ,� � • � ' l+i � I � - --± /9 _ _` -- - - - -- _ --- -- -- -
'� N ,, ` : ' . �e� s .. � ° i � , � /B � . /j : � i8 ' ; /3 -: /.� l�
k I y n ,
I �I! ' Nf , '' � I' : I . _'_' '__._ "_- �_-' ". _ __"_'_"'_ '_. ".. __.__
's�•7a w � .
�3 . S ' � c 4 r . -- � - -. . .__ - - - -'
� ' �r � � t � " � � � ' r! �� �i /� /7 �Y'
� �
� �
� -. i . � __ _ . : / . : �>
� - . , --
s � � /7 . .
�r� . / . , t�_ /G ._ -. _. �- ---- -- 1
� �-.-. ..�..a.✓ � o � i v . t. � � � - - _. _ .. . . __ _ .. _ ..
�� _
.,Jif . .� .. _'.� i , E�.? � _,.��._..'r_..�'.�-=� _ ��_.�..�-_.,1., .-'-/> M .se_ o /! � t . E„ y
�
� ��---�. 21 c.� ((-'-''� ^ . ,, i 1 z ��..'�.«�.c�r 4 � �-°' ��.va�.:.ti�4 �>' It � .. ,-s-- a' '`1-`' j /l
�..»I,fi+�>�•�..:'N' � � u J \ �. ; I}1 � .:d �.__ _ ' _.�.� _._._._ _ 2 _.. _ o _n' , � _ _� �-.,_...___�
_" - 1 � _
�! � � .7da.rs�� • i. I a._,,. �.`_. __�. � f i..� i... .
rr _1 � ( 1'
, ti /a �+(� • - 1 �I _..�.,
I � �
A
�
6 , r'� � � . � �
\ i i � ;1 .6' � .
I �� �9\q, ' �� � �
i. 2 .\,�� i � .
�� � ' ! ' �
� i" P 1 . �
';; ___ -- `e, I .
�-L`� � � i � ' -
PLANNING COI�Il�IISSION MEETING
CITY OF FRIDLEY
DECEMBER 8, 1971
3�
PAGE 1
The meeting was celled to order at 8:00 P.M. by Chairman Erickson.
ROLL CALL:
Me�ers Present: Erickson,
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Nasim M.
Minish, Zeglen, Fitzpatrick, Schmedeke
Qureshi, City Engineer-Director of Planning
APPROVE PLANNIDiG COI�IISSIQN MINUTES: _ D10VEMBER 3, 1971,
MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Commission approve
the minutes of the Planning Cammission meeting of November 3, 1971. Upon a voice
vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
RECEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: NOVEMBER 23, 1971
MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the PZanning Commission
receive the minutes of the Board of Appeals meeting of November 23, 1971. Upon
a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the mofion carried unanimous3y.
RECEIVE BUILDING STANDA&DS-DESTGN CONTROL SIJBC01�4IITTEE MINUTES: NOVEMBER 23. 1971
MOTION by Zeglen, ssconded by Schmedeke, that the Planninq Con�ission receive
the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control 5ubcomn.ittee meeting of
November 23, 1971. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: RL(,�UEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP �71-15 BY EVERT R.
SWANSON: Lote 18 and I9, Auditor's Subdivisian �29 except the East 190 feet�
for a parking lot in vacant R-1 area per City Code 45.051 - 3E.
Chairman Erickson read the public hearing notice.
Mr. Swansun said it was his underatanding that there was to be no building
on the land requested�for a paxking lot. The proposed building will aet an the
corner, but the plans for the building have not been preaented yet.
Mr. Qureshi aaid there were homes all around the lot, and basically it is a
pisce of propertp with no access. Under the Zoning Ordinance, there ahould be
planting strips between the residential area and the parking lot.
Mr. $wanson said he was going to put up a printiag plant, 20,000 square feet
of buildiag oa an area o£ about 3.1 acres. The plant will be 200 Feet wide on
73rd Avenue and 100 feet in leagth. The building will be set on the Southweat
portioa of the property. This is the land where the Legion Hall was and they
owa it now. The tqpe of printing is commercial -- all kinda of jobs, but Aot
newspaper.
,
�
��
�
,
�
�
�
�
�
,
"�
�.7
planning Couunission Meeting - December 8, 1971 Page 2
Chairman Erickson asked if the administration decided the printing plant was
a permitted Use. Mr. Qureshi assured him it was.
Mr. Swanson said two members of the Council looked over his present building
in order to see what kind of a building would be coming in. His present location
is 782 29th Avenue Southeast and is known as Aetna Lithograph Company.
Mrs. Saba, 7345 Central Avenue: She was just wondering if the petitioner
would be putting up a fence between the parking lot and the homes.
Chairman Erickson told her the Commission and Council would require screening
and it is also required in the Ordinance.
Mr. Swanson added that part of the plant is kept in operation alI night. At
the very most there would be four or five cars in the parking lot at night.
During the daytime there would be approximately 40 cars.
1►pTION by 5chmedeke, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planninq Commission
alose the public hearing for the Special Use Permit, SP #71-15, by Evert Swanson
concerning part of Lots 18 and Z9, Auditor's Subdivision #29, except the East
190 feet, for a parking 1ot in vacant R-1.area per City Code 45.051, 3E� upQn
a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimously.
Mr, Swanson said whatever regulations are asked for by the City of Fridley,
he agrees to follow.
The Coimnission felt the cart was before the horse in this request. The
petitioner was asking for a parking lot, on a landlocked piece of ground, but
no mention was made who was going to use it.
The suggestion was made by Mr. Qureshi that if the Coanmission felt this
appraach might be satisf actory to them, they cauld approve the Special Use
Pex�mit subject to getting approval of the plans for the building by the Building
Sta�dards-Design Control Subeommittee and the Council.
1N1']TION by Schmedeke, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planninq Corrurrission
recammend approval to the Council of the Special Use Permit, SP #71-15, by
Evert R, Swanson, �or part of Lots 18 and 19, Auditor's Subdivision #29 except
the 8ast Z90 feet, for a parking Iot in vacant R-1 area per City Code 45.051,
3E, subject to the approva.I of the plans for the pxinting plant by the Buildzng
Standards-Design Control Subcommittee and the City Council and that the require-
ments for screening of the parking area be met. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting
aye, the tnetion earried unanimously.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT= SP ��71-16, EVERETT F. UTTER:
, Fer Section 45.051, 2-A, Fridley City Code to construct an accessozy building
for storage on Lot b, Block 2, Moore Lake Hills Addition.
' Mr. �verett Utter was present.
Ttie part of MX. Utter's lot that abuts Central Avenue is very law and close
f to a storm culvert and that is the reason f4r putting the accessory building
'I ;�, on high ground. .
, '
,
'
,
�
' �
Planning Commission Meeting - December 8, 1971 Page 3
Mr. Harold Lind, 6076 Woody Lane: There has been,��oad put in, but if a
culvert were installed, Mr. Lind would have no objections. The driveway is in,
but no culvert under it.
Mr. Utter explained that seven years ago Mr. Nelson and he got the City to
put in a temporary storm sewer that goes back to within 40 feet of 01d Central
and emptie� there. When the County put in Old Central, he asked the County
if they would put a culvert on private land. Water has been running ov�r the
property. As of now, it is in the process of being connected so there would
not be any water problem once it is connected.
The City Engineer said that originally when this area was developed, there
was no storm sewer. In 1965 the Public Works Departmeut put in a storm sewer.
Recently they have extended the pipe closer ta the culvert. Probably a culvert
will be installed under the driveway next spring. Hopefully the drainage problem
will be solved in this area and there wi11 be no water standing on the lot South
of Lot 6. It is too late in the season now to finish the work.
MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Zeglen, that the Planning Commission close
' the public hearing of the Special Use Fermit, SP #71-16, by Everett F. Utter.
Upon a vozce vote, all voIIing aye, the motion carried unanimously.
'
�
r
'
�
�J
�_ �
i �.
MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Conmrission
recommend to Council approval of the xequest for a Special Use Permit, SP #71-16,
by Everett F. Utter to construct an accessory storage building on Lot 6, Block 2,
Moore Lake Hills Addition per Section 45.051, 2-A of the City Code. tJpon a
voice vote, a1I voting aye, the motion carraied unanimously.
�.
Mr. Utter said he did not plan to build until the culvert is completed.
n
.S. �71-04
NO�THERNi INC.: Being a r�plst o£ tt�e �ast 333 feet of Lot� 3, 4, 6, 7 at�d 8,
except ti�e South 200 feet of Lot 6, and East 333 feet of Lot 2 lying Npxtherly
of I-�694, Auditor's Subdivision #78, subject to easements of record.
Mr. Robert H. Brokopp, Supervisor of Title and Clasing� of Burlington
Noxthern Inc. waa preaent.
1MOTI4N by Sahmedeke, seconded by Fitzpatrick, tha�t the Planning Commiss3on
waive the.resding of the Public Hearing Notice for considerat3on of the proposed
preliminary plat, P.S. #71-04, Burlington Northern Industrial Park Plat No. 1-
Fridley by �BUrlington Narthexn, Inc. Upon a voice vote, a11 vot�ng aye, the
motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Qureshi eaid that this plat is part of an agreement made with 8urlingtan
Northexn about a year ago. The City wanted the East half of thie propexty
platted into smaller lots so the land would not be occupied by the railroad
eompany but rather be aold to other developera for smaller industrial sites.
They felt thls would be one way to provide a buffer between the railroad tracks
for the people living �n the Eaat side of Main Street and secondly getting some
property back on the City tax roll. The railroad company is on the tax roll
uow for the land, but the additional taat would be for the buildinge.
� � _ ��
i '
�
�
'
'
��
,
�
' �
'
Planning Commission Meeting - December 8, 1971 �'age 4
Mr. Brokopp explained that the Southexn boundary, Lot 3, Black 3R is not
definitely decided yet because of legal clsims concernitlg �-69k, and by �he
tim� the final plat is ready! they hope to have this solved.
Another part of the agreement was to give Main Street access in, line wi�h
57th Avenue and that access has been provided.
Mr. Schmedeke, Chairman of Plats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utiiities Subcom-
mittee, added that this item wa� before his committee an hour prior �o this
meeti�g. He was happy to see the land was going to be developed for amall
industrial sites bordeximg ou Main Street. He thought the geople in that area,
and his area included, were afraid it would be a switching yard. Ha felt the
Ci,ty should be complitnenting the railroad comp$ny for working the problem out
in this mannex.
�� answer to Chairman Ericksoa's questlon if there were any othe� agree�pet�ta
ma�1e between the Council and railroad, Mr. Qureshi anrawered '"no". Thexe wexs
no coauaittments, merely the East 300 feet be platted �.nto industria� axs�s.
The watermain is in the middle af the property and easements ars grov�d�d for
that too.
Chairwan Erickson comamented that, supp�pae the City decided they do not want
a piggyback yard anywhere, could the City deny the request?
Probably they can, Mr. Qureshi answered. The City does have an ordinance
that prohibits this Use.
Chairman Erickson continued, that supposing the glat ia approved and the
City do�s not ap�rove the request for a piggyback yard, would thie affect the
access?
Mr. Qureshi said the City has access at 57th and 61�t Avenue, and the
sewer li.ne on Main Street.
Chairman Erickson sai.d he was not in favor of a piggyback yard.
Mr. Minish questioned whether or not there should be more access ta the
interior lots.
Mr. Herbext H. Neeser, 6220 Starlite Blvd.: Mr. Neeser understood the
� railro$c� tracks would stop at 61st, but a track. was laid right behind his
home and this was in addition to the main line. To him tt looked like awitch-
ing tracks.
�
I.'
�
li �
a
Mr. Qureshi said it probably was a temporary storage yard until they got
theix railroad yard on 43rd Avenue built. He understood this was only a
tenaporary use of the property.
Mr. Brokapp said he warr not prepared to talk about tracks, as he was not
fr�aailiar wlth it at all. It is railroad right of way and they have been theze
long before any house8 were there. Being what it is� he thaught �hey could
atill be there and operate and not do anything you would not eacpect along
the railroad right of way.
I ,
�
Planning Commission MeetinR - pecember 8, 1971 pa�� g
_.,.._�
� �
xobert Tr�czyk� 6000 Trinity D�'ive. He would appose �he x�ilroad �oming
, out on 61at Avenue with the piggyi�ac�.. 61st Avenue ia a fai.rly new street at�d
, the City ,�ust gut �n curb and gutter. The ue�.ghbonc�►od was ge�ting away frrnn
this kind of traffic. He cozaplitqented the City on that. He was opposed to
piggyback. I� the �urlington Northern awns property on the ath�r alde of the
�.`� txacks which leade iuto �aat River Raad, why cauldu't they go 4ff �hat way?
�r. Qu,rsshi explr�ined thaz what the railraad company ia �Q�A� i10W is what
the !City xequlx�ed th�tn to do. The C�xy dae�� mat want th�s property $eveloped
lnto �unother ra�lroad u�e, but industria�.. 4ne year aso, with this in mind,
the City requixed them to p�.at i� ordex �o di.�coura�e u�e for rai�road purpoaes.
'I'he major port#or� of th� land ow�ed by the ra��.road is heavy industrial, but
t1�e propexty abu�tia� bl�t Aveaue ie �ight i�duatxial.
Willia� Fink, 61Q1 Star];ita Blvd.: �Ie� aaid tk�ey have lived there a long
t�me, They had been to].d tt�ere would t�Q ap�rtmeuta acxos� the �tr��t, but
�aever imdus�rial. At ane time the laad wa� tu be platted fa�r a schoo�., but
the gric� waa too hi�h. He underatood a p�xk waa g�opoaed tpo, but now,
su�ddrnly, it ie� ba�ck �o light lndustri.al.
Ch�lrman �ricksou sai.d the praperty had nat ch$nged �oning �ox many y$a�s.
�t waa unfc��tu�a�e they were told that. , �
', Mra. Lorsyn� Fink, 6101 Star�.ite B�vd,: Wkien they moved i.nto their hau�e,
they qt�e�tion�d the xai�.road ttrack. They were told there wou�d ?a+a o�e train
� c�ay• �'hey checked on a buffex� aoue. The City �glnrer �t that time came
`' ov�r. Ths ouly thiag he was co�;�erned with waa t�te tres�s that wer� nevax�
�',. pl�uted.
�s�ina�n �ricks�n said the City was na� respapsible fc�r the buffe� zp�n�.
1�r�. Fink asked if the Commisaion felt the 7,i.�t�t �ndu,atrial wauld hurt
their proper�y and what about the park.
Mr. Fitzpa�xi�k exp�.aiued �e wa� �he Chr�lrm�n o� the Fa�rks and �ecreat�.on
C��nals�ion aAd Cha�t they k�ave diacusaed the uee o� �h�s �.amd � and down tq
k3�r�i Avenue, fc+r pa�ksa from t�.me to time, �L wa$ much toa expensive �ropsr�y
�or the� City to �iuy for paxl�s. The City uow ha� an arran�ament for the u�e
of some Qf t�is land on 49th far a par�., bu� there naver was a realietic poasi-�
b�.�ity �or thi+s land to be acquired for � park.
Mr. ��hmedeke �aid that he waa trying to 6ring out that thi.s pr�ae�t grogoaa�
bord�rin� an Maim Stree�, 3QQ f�et deep, ta put lighx �nduskxial. bu�.ldin��
. �har� iaetead af piggYba�ck sexvices, waa our beat altsr�ate. Th� Ci�y hae
coa�xol over th� type p� buildings and the g�eenery axound �he�n and to aey how
thsy ahauld be co�sGrucCed. He was eure the merai�ere af thia Comm�seion wauld
not es11 the peaple down the river to piBBYback �ervicsa, He haa been shautiag
a�.ang ti.u►e for evergreen p�antings fox �andecaping and buffQr. iie wae certair�
tha Ci.ty was �ot trying to hurz the people.
�, ThR Planx��ng CommisaloA�euggested to Mr. and Mra. Fink that if th�y had
knowledge that Che City wae a garty in the agreement fox tree� �or a buffer
zoae„ they �hou�d bring it befoxe the Council. Mr. Min�sh believed thia w��
I� a matter of a pxlvate ag�eeiaent with Carlson and LaViae, and if tt�ere� wae a
wxitt�n agreem�eat, it ahould be produced.
, ��
L�J
�
�
'
,
�
�
'
�
'
'
.�
I�I
u
'
�
—I
�
Planning Commission Meeting - December 8, 1971 Page 6
Ronald McClain, 6Q07 Main Street: He wondered why there wasn't a railroad
crossing at 61st Avenue.
Mr. Qureshi said the City has gone before the Public Service Commission of
the Railroad Commission requesting a crossing and was turned down. The way
it looks now, the railroad crossing is an impossibility. The City is working
to get a grade sepaXation on Mississippi Street so that we have better access
at that point.
Mr. Minish asked if the railroad approved the crossing on 61st Avenue and
the an�wer was they opposed it. He then asked why they opposed it.
Mr. Brokopp answered that this would be a very large crossing. Extensive
hearings were held before the Railroad Commi�sion and permission was refused.
The underpass on Mississippi Street is more aensible in order to keep the
cars away from the tracks.
Mr. Brokopp said the City has an easement for 61st Avenue access. They
gave up enough of their property so that access could be provided for Starlite
Boulevard. They cooperated again with the City at that time. This platting
of 61st Avenue is not anything new, but was put on the'p lat by cvincidence
with the platting down in Sylvan Hills.
Mr. Minish aeked if two access roads would be sufficient. Mr. Fitzpatrick
said he had the same question. This proposal would be for pretty heavy traffic
along 61st Avenue.
Mr. Ferris D. Palmer, 6018 2nd St. N.E.: Se said he did not know haw long
th� railroad company owned the property. In 1950 cows were grazing behind
their lot. Why isn't the property zoned commercial?
MOTION b� Zeglen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, fihat the Planning Commission
close the public hear3ng of the proposed Preliminary P1at, P.S. #71-04,
B�rlinqton Northern Industrial Park P1at No. 1- Fridley, by Burlington
Nerthern, Inc. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried
unanimously.
Chairmaa Er�ckson asked to see a copy of the Council Agreement with the
railroad company. The City Engineer passed out copies to all the members.
Mr. Qureshi said that the railroad would participate in the railroad
separation on Mississippi Street, which, basically, is County road. The City
requested by Resolution the need of the grade separation. Anoka County has
engaged Engineers to make a feasibility study. He continued that in the last
eight yeare the crossover at Mississippi Street ha� been discussed but the
County co�trols the road. Originally it was the railroad company that was
not favorable to the crosaover, but that has been solved. The only support
the rai�.road will give Fridley is before the Railroad Commisaion. The reasons
given for the delay by Anoka County were money and the people in the North
area who feel because it i� a large sum of money, wish the money could be
speat better elaewhere in the County. The County stil� has a rural flavor.
The railroad will be paying lOZ of the cost.
' ��
�I
�
'
'
P�.annin Commaf.ssion M�et� - Dece be 8 1971 Pa e 7
Mr. Miniah made a c,�ma�ent regarding the railxoad campa�y �oC to add any
�ew track� North of 61�st Avenue. I� the di�cua,�ion tha� �ol�owsd, i.t w�s
painted out thr�t withir► xhe rail�coad right of way, Burl�.���p� Nc��r�hern doas
have some extra control. Mr. Minish wondexed if li�ht �.�dua�tx�al� was �h�
best fox�a of aoaing fox this area. Mr. Qureshi eaid th�.s would ba the hlgheat
Us� pf the 1a,nd because of the closeneao of the tr�ck�. Th� G�.ty cannat �an�
dpwc� wi�hout due coa��nsation. Chainqan Erickaon s�►id that i� the arigirtsZ
rig1�� o� way, the railroad cou�a�y could ��e �r� in any way they wlsined wi�thin
the lim:tx� of the Fedexal ]�aw. �n arder Co use inooG af the �ropsrty be�ween
Mr�in St�eet and the traake, the railroad wi.�.l have to app],y �o� permite uadex
o�r Ordina�ce. So the peop�.� +�d the City do have aau� proteation.
' l�r. �chtaedeks eaid be . did not k�now what �las the Co�aissian could sak for.
It sees�ned the petitioner c+a�ne up with exac�7:y wti►+�t the Qounci� a�ked. HQ Wae
aure Che meanb�ra on this Coaanission would frown pn piSSpbacks.
' �r�� though �he x�ailxoad plana to use tho �',as�srly 304 feet c►f the exiati.ng
pro�exty,it i�e p48�ible if �hers ie a p1x�t which maeds tnor� �.and than the
�1at pravide�� ttt�y caa actual�y build'by pl�cia$ Ch�s.atrucxuxe an the lot
� i� �uah a fra�hion �hat they wi11 juet need an eaaesm+�nt to get acceas to Main
SCxee�. Thi.s wau�,d be na prQblem.
I �I
�
'
�
'
'
I'i ,
MQ�'.IUN by �oiunedek�. seconded by ��glen, t?#at �k1�� P.�arua�ng Corr�m.iss.iAn
r�cor�rnend tp �ouncil ap,pxav,�1 af the p,rop�as�ad Frolimit�az�� P1at, P.S. �71--04,
8e�r��ngton Northexn Iudu�str.t�1 Fark P1at NA. 1- Fridle� by �url.ingtQn Nor�.harn,
I.RC. beinq a.�eplat �f t.h�a East 333 feet of �Lots 3, 4. 6, ? and 8, exce,pt tt�e
So�t�i .300 f�e�k eaf Lat 6, and East 33.� f��t of La� a 1y��q North�r�y of T-1t694,
Aud�tt�'s Subdivision No. 78 subject ta Protective C�avenat�ts and Eas�men�s oa�
x+acord, Upon a voice vote, al.� voting �ys, th� motion ��rr.�ed unar�.irrausly.
4.
�.
VACATiON &$QZTESTt SAM TF,�I�IN� 3AV #7].�08: To vacats ex3etin� all�y ia
B�,ock 10, F�ridiey �'ark A.ddi�lan. .
Mr. &ant Teu►�lin, the pe�itioner, waa preaent.
MGt�.IQ�1 b� iFitzpatx�(�k, �ecor�ded by Schmedeke, that the Planning Cammisaion
W�iv� �he re�ding of the public hearing fpr the con�.iderat.ton of a pro,posed
P�rel.tm.inar� P.Ia�, P.S. iY71-05. Edgewater Gardens Plat ?, by Sam T�mpl�r�, Upvr�
,� voice vot�, all votirtg aye, the motion carried unan,�mously•
Th� C�.ty 8ngineer said he
Th� South�rly two lote do not
of tY�e lote ara
xequest for the
the �alle�r on th�
I,ocke Lake Park.
retain i.t.
�equate, and
allay vacatio
�ast, but the
The alley ie
had two cos�aaaents to make regarding thi,s p].at.
taeet the cc�de widxh requirementa, but the reat
the overall area xequiremenCa are met. The
n-- ths Ci.ty feels there �.s no pxablem vacating
North alley ak�ou].d not be vacated bBCauae of
part of th� public access aad tha CiCy �hou7.d
, � _ _ �.5
�
�lanning Commission Meetin� pecember 8� 1�71 Page 8
klr. 3chmedeke said the Pl�t� & Su6divisions-Streets & Utillties Subcommaittee
1 apgrQVed the plat with, ths stipulation that the al.ley to the North be kegt by
the City and aubject to retaining the drainage eaaeme�t
�
'
�
M�• Templin said he would like to bave the portian of the alley on the
Noxtb end for the house on that lot. I� ehe C�.ty reX�ined the a11ey, the
back end af the lut would be only 65 feet. There are sa�ne niae expensive
homes in that neighborhood. He wo�Zd like to build nice ho�ues even if alor�g
the track, He did �ot th�.nk he could get a buyer fox a t�ice expensive home
on a toa smal�. p�.ece of �round.
Mr. Robert Stewa�'t, 17 b7�h Way; He asked if it wa� the i�tention to build
si�gle family dwellings. The answer waa "yes". Mr. Stewart eaid he had no
fu�thez questions.
1 Mar. Gordon �lspenson, 17 Aice Creek Terrace; He �ad mo que�tiona a6out
the bui�.dings, but wAe iuterested in get�ia� a paxk for tha sma�l children of
the area. He would 11ke to �ee the fizat �.ot and perhapa the aecond one
� purchased for a play gark for the little children becau�a� thexe is no suah
facility in the nei�hbork�ood naw.
' Mr. lames P. Glaser, 16 Rice Creek Wayc He said he was told thaG originally,
whec� Bd�ewater Gardens wa� pla�ted, they wanted to buy thia land frotq the xai1-
ro�d comp�ny, but the railroad company wQU�d not se11. He would like ta know
who iai.tiated thi� paxticular action now. He, also, asl�ed that if t�� under-
, paaa �oee throu�h, would l�st�ton Avenue be closed for the� eafety of ths children
coming ou� �f this area.
Mx. Hrokopp said the property had been for sale at l�a�t fox te� yeare that
be knew of, M�. Tetnglin thought the pr�.e� was too hi$h in 1968 -- now it ie
al� ri�ht. There wae nothing underhand�d about it on his gax't nox 1��. Templin's.
Ao�othy Stewar�, 17 N.E. 67th Way: She said she walks her dog ia the
Northerly lot area and there is a s].ight hi11 there. I� wauld tnake a nice
park and she �elt that for all the tax�s they pay, they ahould have a park
in that a�ea.
Mr. Templ�.n eaid tha� in case the c�.ty wou�d be interested, he wou�d be
lnappy to talk about that �.at for paack puxposes. The City had a good chance
to take a part of that area that is tax forfeit.
Mr. Qureahi mentionesi the fact that all of the lots South of �he px'opoeed
p].�� are tax forfeit.
Mr. Tewplin said that as far as plat�i.ng is aoAce�rAed, thexe is a paseib13.1��
tl�eq could get everybody �atisfied. There is auch a thing �hat maybe with
th�t lat on the end by Locke Lake, he could possibly swap with t� fo�f�it
l�nd.
Tk�e City Eagineer said that probab�y the City could do something like thi�.
I� �here ia any way theq can, they would like to try it. Tf they can 1�gally
do it! they would accept Mr. Templin'a offet.
Mr. Fitzpat�cick said that 1n view of the questiona at thi� meat�n�, he
w�auld tnaYcQ a motion.
,
�
�
�
�
� .
_ _ 46
�lanning Commission Meeting - December $i 1971 Pa�e 9
MUTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Schmed�Jce, that �ha publ.ic hear.�n� be
car��.inued until Ja�uaxy 1?. 1972 a�d tbat a cheak of the liat �.� peop.Ie nat.t�-
f.�ed be rr�de fox tha prcaP�os�d P.reli�inary P.lat, F.S. �►7�,-QS, �d��wa�ex Garder�
PZat 2, by Sam �'empl�r� b��ing a xeplat of I�ts 1�hxou�h 9, �!�ra�k 1Q, Fx.�dley
Park Additian and the vacation Rec,�uest, SAV #71-G►p, S,�m T�nF1,in to vacat� th�
�rx��tsr�g ��,1ey �.n �1ock 10, Fridley Park Add.i tivr�. Upo�a a Yo.ia� vots, ,��1
ucitin� ay�, th� ,mot.ton �arri�a unanirpously.
6, LOT 6P�IT RFQtJ�ST� I�.S. �i71-lk�,� BY EUNiC� Q� FNG$LHA,�D'�t �o� 5, �],c�c�t 2,
.
A�v�rwood Maaor Addi.tian. To �atabli�h �wo bu��di�g sltae.
I�s�. and M��. F.�g�*lha�dt were pr�sent.
Ths Gity �ngineer e�lained ti�at because thi� ia a 1+�rge lo�, Mr. Enga�,-
� �axdt was unable to se].�. it as sueh, th�refox�a hs was aaki�� fo� a split. Mr.
Engelbardt put 1a onlp one water and sewer aervice fox the la�'g�a 1Qt, and
anaw he would b� required to put in anoCher. One lat wc�u3d ba app�ax�mat+al.y
75 feet and the oth�r 7'9 feet wide. Th� 1at� mee� the� area requireman�a,
� O�nce the 1Qt split is approved. �he petitloner ia� required to get a c�rti�ica��
of survey. The Cwmmission could leave the survey r�quirem,ent ogen aa that if
�tr. Engelhardt would hav� a buyer, it could.be produced a� that time.
�
C
�
r
LJ
,
�
�
,l�TZ'ON by �'itzpatrick, seconded by Zeglen, that the Platan.ing Ca�rm.tssion
recommend to Caunail fihe I,ot Split Request, L.S. #71-14, by Eunic� p, ,En�e.l-
hardt, to split Lot 5. Bloc.k 2. Rive.�wood ManAr Add.i�ion .i�a a.rdear to ge� �wo
�iu�ld.�ng sit�s subject to the understanding thexe is no ob,jections to an addi�
tiona.i water and sewer service and that the e�rtif�cate of survey be submitt�d
a� the time the Iot is scald, Ugon a voiae vvt�, al.t vot�nq ay�, the ma�iQx�
carried unanimously.
7. LOT SPLIT R�QUEST: JOHN M, METCALFE; Lat 16, except the EasGerly 165
feet thereof, Revised Auditor's 5ubdivision No. 23. For a propoaed
$e�ond building site.
The explan�ation by the Cfty Engineer was that although Rivervi.ew Terrace
goes through the Easte�ly part of Lot lb, there is adequate land for the sp1�t.
�'her� is a house on Lat 16 and Mr. Metcalfe p1�n� to �p13t off tl�e fron� oi tha
�.Qt, retai�.ing Ghe Weet half of the lat where the house is and se11 �he othsr
half .
Mx. Sch�+deke aaid tlnat the Plats & Subdivi�ion8-Streets & Utili�ie� Sub-
comw.ittee appx'oved the lot aplit with the stipulation that Mr. Me�cal�� work
with �he En�ineer��g Department ta get all the necessary easemeat� and o�her
requ�rementa.
Chairman Erickeon commented that the lots would bes approxitaately 91 feet
�ide and a�a average of 1.U0 feet deep. If the eaeeu�at were tak�n off, Chs
lote wauld be Subetandard. He wondered if Mr. Metcalfe were aware that when he
starts digging fox eewer and water Chat the aervice would be fairlp deep �.n ths
middle lo�. It �s lower'than the roadway� dspeading upon where the lot li��a
wAa1.d be. Ha raight not be able to relocate the aervias.
�
�
�J
�
,
� 4�
�
Plannin� Commiss.ion Meeting - December 8,_ 1971 p�,�p
MOTION by Schmedeke, aeconded by Fitzgatrick, that t1�e Plannzng Commission
table the Lot Split Request, �.5. #71-15, by John M. Metpal'fe to sp1�t Lot 16,
except the Easte�ly 165 feet thereof, Revised Auditox's Subdiv�,�ion No. ?3
unt.il January 12, 1972. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion rarried
unanimously. ,
8. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF JANLTARY 12, 1972: REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL IJSE
PERMIT, SP 4�71-17z'DON'S GULF SERVICE STATION. Request for U-Haul rentals
on Easterly 351 feet of Lot 12 and Easterly 351 feet of the Southerly
20 feet of Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision No. 155, except Ghat part taken
for highway and street purposes, pez Code Sectian k5.101, Subsectian 6,
Paragraph 3E.
MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Corranission set
the Public Hearing date of January 12, 1972 for the Special Us� Pexmit, SP
� #71-17, by Don's Gu1f Service Station for U-Haul rentals. Upon a voice vote,
a11 vot.ing aye, the motlon carried unanimously.
�
�
�
�
r�
9. COMPREHEN$TVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
The Commis�ion set the date of January 26� 1972 as a study tneeting foX the
Compzehensive F1an for the City of Fridley.
10. SECOND MEETING IN DECEMBER (DECEI�E& 22 L 1971).
The Comm�ission decided to fore�o the Planning Commisaion meetin$ of
December 22, 1972. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will
be January 12, 1971.
11. GUIDE LINES FOR LOTS SUBSTANDARD IN SIZE:
Chairman Erickson sa�d the question is if a peti.tioner, when he purchased
, a 40 fpot lot, could leg�lly build on it. In 1956 he could not build on 40
fa�t ].ote, ttor can he today. The question now is what should �he Plan�ing
Comu�i.ssion dQ abaut these lots.
r
r
�
'
'
,
The City Engineer referred to the McCline lots: They were tax farfeit
befare 1963, since then no taxes were paid and the lots went tax forfeit
again. On twa of the lots East of 3rd Street in the Plymauth Additian, Ghere
would be a way to build by vacating the atreet and adding the additional land
to the lots. Thi� r,,�ould give Mr. McCline 70 foot lats.
The Chairman said that wherevex possible, the Commission should try to
work out some guide lines or statement of policy. The etudy thia evening
would be con�ined to Plymouth Addition.
After a lengthy discussion among the me�,bers of the Plannir�g Cotpmissio�,
Mr. Qureshi summarized the Cominission's conmaent� as folZowa:
,
'
'
1
�
� �
P�.a�ing Commis.si.on Meetin�- December 8, 1971 #'age 11
47th Aqenue: Lot 30, Block 9(Lot East of 3x'd St.)
48th Avenue: Lot 34, Blocl� 8(Lot East of 3rd St.)
To be allowed to build by vacating the Southerly half of the
street making thQ lots 70 feet wide. Total structure to be
built on the 40 foot part of the lot.
4$th Avenue: Lot 15, Bloc�C 2(Lot on West side of 3rd St.)
Consider allowing to build a small houae 1� etories high with
5 foot side yard ta the North. House �.ca f1t in wlth the
aeighboYing structure�.
48th Avenue: Lot 15, Blos1� 3 f�ot West o� 2� Street)
Gonsider allowi�g to bui�.d a single story, $mall houas wi�h
� 5 foot side yard to the North. House to fit in with �he+ i�aigh-
boring structuxes.
46th Avenue: Lot 16, Block 11 (Lot East of 2nd Stxee�)
Single story staall house with 5 foot aida yard to the Narth
to be considered. House ta fit in with the neighboring
structures.
3rd Stxeet: Lot 11, Block 10
The Comanission wanted to check further abou� the ownership
and background.
47th Avenue; Lot 30, Block 12 (Lot East Qf Main Street)
Shou�.d not be considered for constxuction becauae of the traffic
aad croasin� str�et traffic visual probiems.
49th Avenue: Lot 30, �1ock 2(Lot on car�er of 2� Street)
49th Avenue: Lot 3fJ, B1ock 1(Lot or� cornex of University Avenue)
Should no� be considered for construct�.on becauae of the traffic
and crossing atreet traffiG visual problems.
M�. Qureahi said that the Planning Caannission indicated that these recoat-
' m,endations should be forwarded to the Council with the following additional
aommen�e. The �cequest far eonstruction ; these lots should sti11 go through
the �oard of Appeals for variances so that there will be a chance of additipna7.
diecuaslon with the neighborhood before the City makea the final decision oa
� allowing the conatxuction. 3'hey also wat�ted these reco�upendationa mads availab�.e
ta the Board af App�eala.
i
� ,
��
an.rou�z :
There being no f urther businese, 'Chairman Erickson adjouxned �he meeti�$
at 11:4Q P.M. .
Respectfully submltted
�.' �t' �'�-�-.-..
Haz� 0'Bxian - A�cording Secretaxy
n
�
BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL MEETING OF DECEMBER 9, 1971
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Zeglen at 8:00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Zeglen, Tonco, Lindblad, White
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gnerre
O�HERS PRESENT: Hank Muhich - Chief Building Inspector
MOTION by Tonco to approve the,minutes of the November 23, 1971 meeting
as written.
Seconded by Lindblad. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimousiy.
1. CQNSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO THE �RESENT
BUILDING LOCATED ON LOT 27, BLOCK 2, COrAtERCE PARK ADDITION, THE SAME
BEING 7541 CO1r11RERCE LANE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, (REsUEST BY MOGUL
CORPORATION, 7541 COMMERCE LANE N,E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA,)
Mr. Richard Gallant, of [he Mogul Corporation, and Mr. Bob Coyle, �
representing the Balco Building Systems, Inc., were present to present
the request. They want approval to enclose an existing 24 ft. x 50 ft.
storage dock for empty drums, that presently only has a North wall.
C�
'_ 7l'he Balco Building Systems Inc. �onstructed the original building. Tte
addition will have bronze colof�d steel curtain walls to match the existing
� building. The exterior is a factory finished panel and would have no
' insula�ion. Mr. Tonco asked if there was any dan�er of puncturing this
wall when the drums were being Zoaded. Mr. Coyle said it was possible
to puncture anything, even something of a two layer construction. Mr.
Zeglen asked if they had damage to the existing wall from drums. Mr.
� Gallant said there wasn't any. Mr. Coyle said there would be a struct-
ural member about 4 ft, high.
�
��
�J
' _
�J
�f
Mr. Coyle said they were adding a stairway and dooz in the additiqn to
meet the fire safety requirements. The addition will have an 8 ft, by
8 ft. door at dock-high elevation for loading the drums.
Mr. Tonco asked about the roof bar joists. Mr. Coyle said they were of
tubular type steel instead of the rod type.
Mr. Muhich said the addition would sti11 meet the code requirements for.
density and parking.
MOTION by White to recommend that Council approve the request to
construct an addition.
Seconded by Tonco. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion
carried unanimously.
�1
�
�
BuildinR Standards - Desi�n Control Meetin�'of December 9, 1971 PaR� 2
2. GONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT PHASE I OF AN INDUSTRTAL WAREAOUSE AND
OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED ON LOTS 11 THROUGH 15, BLOCK 3, ONAWAY ADDITION. THE
SAME BEING 7800 BEECH STREET N.E., FRIbLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BX AL ZEIS
223-94TH AVENUE N.i+'
, Mr. A1 Zeis was present to present the request.
, Mr. Zeis explained he has purchased Z5 lots on Beech Street. He will be
constructing one build�ng, ia three phases, that will be joiaed by a
coimnon wall of 12 inch block. This request covers only Phase I.
.,
'
The Board felt the pla�s were complete in evexy way. The plans showed the
elevations of all the buildings, the landscaping, parking areas and all
details of the buildings. .
Mr. Zeis purchased the property from Juster Enterprises, Inc. about 6 weeks
ago. He was not aware of an alley vacation notice cancerning this property
until December 9, 1971, the day of the subcommittee meeting. Mx. Zeglen
read a copy of the pending ordinance. The follawing is an excerpt from that
public hearing notice. �
" Section 2. For the vacation of an alley deacribed as follows:
• Located in Block 3, Onaway Addition and bounded on the
'l North by the South line of 79th Avenue and bounded on
the South by the North line of 78th Avenue,
' .
�
,
�_J
�
'
, '
'I '
All lying in the Southeast Quarter (SE�) of Section 3,
T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota,
Be and is hereby vacated. "
The Board also noted from the notice that it was before the Council for the
public hearing on June 14, 1971 and had a fixst reading on June 21, 1971.
There was a note on the hearing notice that it was to be held until a deed
for a cul de sac was recorded.
Mx. Zeis said if the vacation is granted he will have to change Y�is plans
completely. The parking area would ha•e to be moved to the front of the
building and this would ruin his whole concept and the aesthetics of the
building. He wasn't sure he would want to go ahead with the project.
Mr. Muhich told him to come in to the office on Fridley, December 10, and
see what could be done about the vacation. �
The proposed project will cover 32,600 square feet. Phase I will be 70 feet
by 150 ft or 10,500 square feet. This is below the 40%'o density allowed in
the Code. Mr. Zeis will lease this office and warehouse building. It will
be constructed of concrete and scored block with brick veneer around t�he
office entrances. All block witl be painted inside and outside.
50
f �_ ..
�. _„_ .t-'J�
.
8uilding Standards - Design Control Meeting of December 9; 1971 PaB� 3
Mr. Lindblad asked about facilities for trash. Mr. Zeis �hought this would
be the responsibility of the re:�ters. Mr. Tonco said it was the owners
responsibility to provide dumpsters. He Lhought as there,was room near the
loading docks, the dumpsters could be located iaside the building.
MQTION by Tonco to reco.��anend that Council approve tl+e cor.cept and the
isauat�ce of a building permit for Phase I subject to the owner obtainia� a
selease of a vacation.request,prov�ding the followi,ng atipulations are met:
l. Inatall security lighting. �
2. Provide trash disposal dump$ters within the building.
Seconded bq Lindblad. IIpon a voice vote, all voting aye, the nwtion
carried unanimously. �
Chairman Zeglen adjaurued tbe meeting at 9;10 P.M.
Reapectfully aubmitted,
Secretary
� /
a
0
y
r-
,
'
�
'
1.
,
THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF DECII�ER 14, 1971
The meeting was called to order by Chairnian Minish at 7:35 P.M.
MF.�L��ERS PRESENT: Minish, Sondheimer, Wall
MErIBERS ABSENT: Harju, Drigans
OTHERS PRESENT: Clarence Belisle-Building Inspector
MOTION by Sondheimer to approve the minutes of the November 23, 1971 meeting
as written.
Seconded by Wa11. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried
unanimously.
Chairman Minish reported to the Board that the Council had concurred with the
Board's recommendations on the November 23, 1971 items.
A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES OF: SECTION 56.05, 1Bi, FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO INCRF.ASE
THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE FO�t AN INSTIT[TTIONAL SIGN IN AN A-1 DISTRICT FROM
24 SQUARE FEET TO 48 SQUABE FEET AND SECTION 56.45, lE TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM
HEIGHT OF AN INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN AN R-1 DISTRICT FR�i 6 FEET ABOVE LOT GRADE
MINNESOTA.)
Mr. Charles Peugh and Mr. Jack Lawrance, representing Signcrafters, were present
to present the request. Mr. Marvin Anderson, a member of the church, was also
present.
, Mr. Peugh explained the reason they are requesting the area variance is because
the overall area of the sign is 6 feet by 8 feet but the copy area of the sign
is only 5 feet by 7 feet. The remaining area of the sign is molding. The
variance on the height is being requested, to get the sign high enough ao the
, childxen in the area would not be able to get into the sign to change the
message on it. The height is also wanted to get the sign higher than the average
pile up of snow so it could be seen during the winter months.
�
'
�_�
'
Mr. Lawrance stated the sign will be a double face interior illuminated, so�t
glaw, sign with a total height of 10 feet. It will have a plastic face with
all steel construction. The top of the sign, which will have the church name,
pastor's name and service times, will have a black background with white letters.
The bottom, a five line attraction panel, will be white with black letters.
The Board asked why they couldn't use smaller letters and decrease the sign size.
Mr. Lawxance answered there are stock Iettera of 2 inches, 4 inches and largex.
They are using the 4 inch letters on this sign as it will be positioned about
50 yards from Osborne Road and they want the moving traffic to be able to see
and to read the sign. He added again that the total copy area is only 5 feet by
7 feet.
Mr. Belisle stated the City would like to see a lower profile aign and he added
this sign is 100 per cent over the Code requirements.
52
. ,�-''
,,..... c, ��
� n � ��,,,�- � ; � �
��
i�.
The Minu�es of the
of Anneals
�e.�- �f'� i
r
�%1
- 14_ 1971 Pa¢e 2
Mr. Lawrance said they could lower the sign 1 foot in height, which would
make it 3 feet off the ground, but they would not like to see it any
lawer than that. The sign will have a lock on it but when a sign is low
enough for children to reach it they are bound to try to get into it.
The Board asked for the exact location of the sign.
Mr.Peugh answered it would be placed on the sod that is 4 feet from the
front of the new church addition.
Mr. Lawrance added there are two windows in the front of this addition
and the sign will be placed in the middle of them so it would not obstruct
the view from the windows.
Mr. Anderaon said it would be approxi.mately where the old temporary sign
was, that is now down, but will be closer to the building.
Mr. Sondhei:ner asked how far this would be from the sidewalk.
Mr. Peugh answered 38 feet and Mx. Belisle added the minimum is 18 feet.
The Board agreed the sign should be lowered to be only 9 feet high.
Mr. Wall felt a planter should be added at the bottom of the sign to add
attractiveness to the sign and also would prohibit children from walking
under the sign.
Mr. Anderson said they do have some bricks left over from the church
addition and it was thought they would use them for that purpose. Some
people from the congregation would be doing this work when the weather
permits.
The Board questioned what type of zoning was across the street. On the
City Zoning Map it shows that area, in Spring Lake Park, zoned R-1. The
land is vacant at this time.
Mr. Lawrance said he thought there was going to be a medical center across
the street.
1�DTION by Wall to clase the public hearing.
Seconded by Sondheimer. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion
, carried unanimously.
: 1�OTION by Wall to reco�nend to the Council approval of the area variance
from 24 square feet to 48 square feet and the height variance from 6 feet
I' to only 9 feet, pxovided the sign is located in the center of the neja
church addition, belaw the peak, approximately 4 feet from the front of
the structure, and for the following reasons: �
`�� I: Theze fs�more than adequate space on either side of the sign.
��!
�
53
,
_. 54
� The Minutes of the Board of APPeals Meeting of December 14, 1971 Page 3
' 2. There is no safety or other factor Khat would make it dangerous� as
it does not obetruct traffic visibility.
3. It provides readability at the large setback.
' 4. No one was present who was in opposition to the sign.
' Seconded by Sondheimer. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the a�otion
carried unanimously.
� ADJOURNMENT :
The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Minish at 8:10 P.M.
� Reapectfully submitted,
. C�
IMARY HINT
Secretary
'
'
'
�,I
'
�
'
I '
'
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
FRIDLEY, MINIVESOTA
December 15, 1971
MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF ONE 14' VAN TRUCK
On November 15, 1971, the Council reeeived the bids for this
vehicle from Iten Chevrolet and Suburban Chevrolet. This van-tyge
truck is approved in the 1972 Budget, and will be funded 2 by the
City and Z by Federal Civil Defense funds, which have already been
approved for the project. The truck will be a Civil Defense vehicle
which will be loaned to the Park Department and is to be utilized as
a portable repair shop for park equipment ar.d facilities, -
I would concur with the recommendation of the Civil Defense
Director that the City Council award.the low bid o� Iten Chevrolet
Company for the purchase of one 14' van truck.
Very respectful.ly,
�' , '!� � _�' •
'__1 �, �.. �_
..� i �..1=_ '\ rt... '6. .-_C. �
Gerald R. Davis
Gity rianager
GRD/ms
55�
��
,
i ,
. �
j ' .
'
�
�
0
�
�� _
OFFICE OF CIVtL DEFENSE
G✓i�� a� �zideec�
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, Minn. 55421
ANOKA COUNTY
Memo To; Geraid R. Davis, City Manager
From . Robert D. Aldrich, Director, Fridley Civil Defense
Date , December 14, r97� .
Subject: Specifications CD %1-1
�
In reference to the above described specifications for one 14 foot Van
type truck for which bids were received November 10, 1971, I make the
following recommendation to you:
Of the two bids received, the bid of Iten Chevrolet Company was ti�e
apparent low bidder. They had stipulated that any price increases from
the Chevrolet Company would be passed on to the city.
The attached ietter indicates an increase of 22% effective December l,
1971• 7his makes tf�e bid figure of Iten Chevrolet to be $4,602.25.
This figure is still lower than the bid of Suburban Chevrolet by
approximately $102.00.
It is my recommmndation that the City Council award the bid to Iten
Chevrolet Company in the amount of $4,602.25.
A copy of the letter of approval of this project by the Federal Civil
Defense is attached for your information. The procedure that is used on
matching fund projects is for the city to pay the full amount of the
purchase and then bill the Federal Civil Defense for the 50% matching funds.
RDA:et
0
5�
�
,
�
�
��_
'
�
,
'
�
' � �.�.
MEMO T0: GERALD R. DAVIS, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MARUIN C. BRUNSELL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RECERTIFYING TAX LEVY
DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1971
The attached resolution recertifying the tax levy to the Anoka
County provides for a tax levy of $126,047 iess than the original
tax levy submitted to the County. .
The reason for the new tax levy is because of the change in the
tax laws. The City will be getting more in state aids than
previously.
There is one source of revenue that has been cut f rom the previous
level and that is the City's share of the revenue collected on
trailer homes. Because the new formula for trailer homes provides
that they will be paying considerably less in licenses or taxes,
the City's share of revenue from this source shows a considerable
drop .
For the comple�e detail on revenue estimates as originally proposed
and as adjusted, see the resolution providing for adjusted revenue
estimates for the City`s budget for the year ]972. There are no
changes in the expense side of the budget.
- J ��
_� �
�
0
�� C�
. ` �'
RESOLUTION N0. / �-l� � ' / ��/
A RESOLUTION RECERTIFYING TAX LEVY REQUIREMENTS FOR 1972 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA
FOR COLLECTION
BE IT RESOLUEO, That the city of Fridley certify to the County Auditor
of the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, the follo�ving tax levy to be
levied in 1972.
General Fund $
Contribution to P.E.R.A.
Firemen's Relief
Police Pension Fund
Debt Service Fund - Civic Center Bonds
Debt Service - Parks
923,625
59 , 566
17,602
57 , 547
36,225
45 ,306
Total Levy $ 1,139,871
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the amount herein certified with respect
to the Public Employees Retirement Association is in the amount required by
law.
PASSED AND 1�DOPTED BY THE CITY COUPdCI�r� OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TNIS
`.1 � �
� �� DAY 0F �' ��� �� , 1971.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK-f�IARVIN C. BRU�lSELL
MAYOR - JACK 0. KIRKHAP1
0
�
�
W
J
J
J
H
�
�.1.�
�
H
Q
�
Q
O_.
�
O
C�
G1
W
J
Q
F---
W
�
�
>
W
J
J
J
a-r
�
N
n
�
r
H
� Z
F-- a
W O
Z g
.... ¢
�I
�
�.I..�
J
J
J
r-+
�
n
II �
H
� Z
F--" _
W O
Z �
� Q
N N r O f� O O N
0� CO '--- 00 I'� M 00 l0
l,U lp r dl l.[) f� O ^
O O l0 �l N lf') �7 �
. . . � •
N N r �- r I� M
M
M �A O l� O O r"" d`
� I��� OO N n
r M N M � c7' O1 �
w w n ^
Ln 00 I� lfl I.fl �f' e- ►�
O LC) r- Ln M d' r r-
� N r
r
�. E�f
d' cf' l0 d' CO N
I\ lf10101 Nl0
G� r • r r r
M
lfl O O O O O
l fl O O O O O
^ _� O CO ^ Cn I
N �I��t' �tC)
Qp d- N �f� M'd'
�
�
a
J N
. . � QJ T3 � 'C7
J � S=
� �
� �F-- LL LL]
� i
•r � 4J +�
r-- O • • -F-� N �
� •r � � -l7 4J
d' � VI U QJ � c
�•�voa�
p • cn a) > m >
z cn •- a s- c.> o
� C�d � N•r-� L
L� 7 • QJ QJ V) > S.- �
� Q...' � U •r (CS �
J LL • N•r +-� U a. r'-+
� W S-.r�
[� • •r O N
W W;�LiL� C
Z —�
w F-- ;
L� �i
0
� �
�- r
P� N.
cT'
t.f) tD
�p N
p tfl Cp N
O lO ^
M GY r C�
O N
O N 00
r 61
N r �
� N
r
� �
�
II
� 't7
O N
•r i-�
i-� 25
fi5 E
N � •r
Q r . -F--�
Z � N
� > W
LL
</� 'Li II
Q' Ll QJ
W � +� . �i--�
_ � �a �s
H- �-- �
Q •r Ql
J +� �
_1 N �
c� W rt3
.. �
J _1 . r
Q Q f� r
F-- F- +-� r
G` C O 'r
F- F- i-- --
�
5;3
GROSS LEVY
Total Genera7 Fund $ 923,625
Other Funds
P.E.R.A. 59,566
Fire 17,602
Police 57,547
Debt Service
Civic 36,225
Park 45,306
Total Other Funds 216,246
Total All Funds 1,139,871
Total Estimated Valuation = $28,801,865
Mill Value Estimated = 28.226
December 14, 1971
NET LEVY
$ 905 , l 53
58,375
17 , 250
56,396
35,500
44,400
211,921
$ 1,717,074
MILL RATE
32.0682
2.0682
.6111
1.9980
1.2577
1.5730
7 . 5�J80
39.5762
��
s�x uc.�dr �+�+ n� � •e����ion o��.oca7 c�over��ment
� Forrtt 229 V Levy Limitations for 1971/1972 .
;'; , . For Governrnental Subdi vi sion
�
�_Co�ieS to be filed�s�rith the Commissioner of Taxation and Covnty Auditor
� of County, Ci ty, �'i 1 i age or To�,m i denti fy� Date of Certi
� ... .
.
�i; � Tota1 1970/1971 Levy on Taxable Value
Exclusive af Special Assessments
:i� D�duct: Special Levies
(a) ��Jel fare Ai ds
� ' {b) Bonded Indebtedness
Tota1 Special�Levies
,; 3' Add: 1971 Aids � . -
(a) 1971 Exempt Property ReimSursement �
.(Exclude allocation to �re7fare aids and b�r�ded
� � indebtedness s�ecial levies) �
(b) 1971 Sales Tax Per Capita Aid �
' ,(Exclude allocation to welfare aids special.levy)
Total •1971 Ai ds
4' iotal 1g70/ip71 7ax Levy less Special Levies�plus Rids
(Item l less Item 2 plus Item 3)
�.:;" .
� ��
ication �
$ 1.164,548,74
;
� ------ �
$ 83,590.00
. � E3,59Q.00
� 57 ,-�37 �.6 .
$ 208,431.30 . -
, . �259,4b8.56 �
5. ig�0 Population '.
fi, 1970/1971 Levy Limit 6ase Per Capita (Itena � d�vid�d by Iter�� 5}
7. 1977/1972 t�iaximum Per Capita Tncrease (Item 6 tin;es 6%)
8� 1g1�/lgl2 Levy Limit E�ase Pet, Capita (Item 6 pius Itern 7)
¢ 1.,.34.Q�42L• 30 —.
29,233
�-_85:�2_.____. _.
� ?.75]._2_.� _
�$_,_�044
� 197] Po ulation ----`- `_-_— --_ -- --
p 29 636 �--_ -
�.' Tota� 1971/1972. Le:��i Lir;i ���;:se (It��;� E tir��s ItE;�� 9)
1, Deduct: 1972 Aids �
'(a) Local Gcverr.�e:,'� ��i 1(Exl Sessioi� L. iQ71
Ch. 31, Art. 21), (Fro�n �or.; 276) �
(b) Taconi �e �•iuni ci p�;l ��i d(Ex. Sess i on L. 1971 ,
' Ctt. 31, �lrt. 30), {Fro�,T forr� ?31 )
�C� �c;CO�lli;� C^;_I!1`�/ hiC� �[;.. ��'jSlG1i L. ��!�
� • C�l. �;, .�•.` ... ;'�� r-- `.., ,��. ?��1
_ /
0 -; � �
� ,cta l_,72 ;"t;-,;(a) :;l�:s (b; �1��; (c � �
1 , 440 , �'�40 . 00
�—_.����Z27.15 ,
�--- --- --� ^-- ---------
� 3 � 317 2�7 .15 -- ---- -
'.� 1971 �972. � ��,'<<i l � � ' ' �� ... � ' .. . —
� ��� L'�'j �.l;�lita�]u11 Yr! ;�iV� Ot �i;�Cia� �;'V7E5 �i11C�
SFIECl d� r�5�£'.���.,�r1` j � I f `f�! I� i�i i il�.i� T i.;:�(il � � 1
'
�l_,D�i6_,'J_l � •_00 --- _---
0
� lax t�epar
I F.°.rm 280
LWIVI�, -Gi fT,�YlLTHG`E OR 7U1vT1 F71 IN V
� AU7HORIZED i°71/1972 LEVY
izs to be filed viith the Comrnissioner of Taxation and Coun
e of County, Ci ty, Vi 11 age or Toti��n i denti fy
�
Auditor
Date of Certification
� � . �
�A. Total 197]/1972 Levy On 7axable Value (before homesfiead credit
;� reduction and excluding special assessments .
'6. Deductions (special levies autsi
'� , (�) (m}unts to Satis�y Judgments
a
e overali ievy linitation
$
�b) . . � _
' �
� � •$
'(2) Costs of Comp7ying ��aith Orders of the State cf Minn., U..S.
Govi. or wi th La��rs of the 1971 P�ii nn. Legi sl ature Requi ri ng
An Activity Resulting In Increased Expenditures
' ta� �
tb) �
' (�) � �`.�
(3) �►mounts For Incr�ased Public Pension Plan Support Due To
' Enactments Qf La�v Prior To Ju7y 7, 7977 and Effeci�ve
Thereafiter
,� (4j �imounis For Volun�:eer Firemen's P.eiief Assn. Resuli:inq From
Laars 1971, Chapter 26],�Section 2
,(5) Excess Over Calendar Year 1970 Expenditures �or �
Local Share Gf Programs �luthorized Qy La��� t�lhere
P9atching Funds Have 6een �lppropropiated By tne State of
, Minn. or the U. S. Govt. �
�a) $
�b) $
' ��� �
'(6) Expenses R2asonably and ^;ecessarily Incur�r�d ?n �r�pnring
for or Repai ri i�g if7e Effects of A �'!a �ural Ui sast�r
(a ) �
1 (b ) � --
�2�
� 1,139,871
$
�
. ��
$ .
,
� � �
, (�) � $
(7) Unr,imh�arsed Costs of t�lelrare Aic�s Urder i�iirn. Statutes
� (a) Aid to ±t-;� :i�_`,,��' c
i � � i `i . S . i �i v'. , :i . � - .. . � j '�:rl i ,, � , � � Y------------- -
(b) Old G�� assi,��:nc� �
' (P-1.S. �1909, S. 25�.1 i tu_ 2;5.^3) . —
i' (c) Aid to ��e blind $ „
(t�1.S. 1969, S. 256.49 �0 25E.71 )
I (d ) Ai d to ' far,i 1 i es tvi th d�;�enc'��nt Ch i 1 dren ,�
' (f-1. S. ] 969, S. 2.56. 7?_ �0 2�0.8�' ) �
'�_,_ '
Tax.Department
�':F 280
;� � �2
m
;' (e) h1edi ca1 Assi stai�ce $ ----
(M.S. 1969, Ch. 256 B)
� {f) Poor F�elief . � $ ----
' (M.S. ]969, Ch. 2b1, 262 and 263)
'' (8� Costs of Principal and Interest on Bonded Indebt�dness
:� '(9� Costs for Rer�oval of Condemned Property Under Extra
Session Lav�s 1971 Chapter 31 Art. 28
�3
$ ----
$ 81,531
$ ---- _ .�---=�
Toial Special Levies � $ 83,158
'
— — —;
;(, Praperty Tax Authorized 4lithin Levy Limitations,(Section A.
minus Section B) �1,05�,,71�,
;, • -
; � �
. .
Cerii fi cati on i'hat Property 7ax �evi es Are Authori zed tdi th i n Levy Li n�i tati ons
;� � �
i I, � , � of .
; Name of Tax Official (Ti�le of Tax Ofi�icial
' '�
. , County,
.
St�ame of Taxing District) . �
'' Minnesota; do hereby certify that the auth'orized property tax as sho�•�n in Section C of
ihis Form 2E0 is correct and ��rithin levy iimitations for said taxing district.
�' wi.tness my hand and official seal at , Minnesota, this
day of � , 19 =
, ' , � ,, _ �
0
�
'
'
' C '
of
Title ofi Tax Cf�icial ~
Name of Tax Official
«an�e of 7axi ng Di st;ri ct�--
County
0
, '
,_ ,
� �
i
: \.i�
7.
0
N ��
O < f��
�
. ) �'�
. �� � .� r�
� �
H �F. �,
A
' ` .
� I
:� 'I
� i!
rO a
.�C <
' O
¢ O N2
z
N
H
a
' a
.. ���
' o �
.�
+-' p-
G q
] U
o � ,o
U � � �
' �
rn
.,
1
.i
�
' C� N
W Gv.. �
� U
�
�
�
' � c.�
� o a
►-� Q V V
�
¢ t�
H �
Z � �+ a
W
.�
Z
C
W
' �
� x q
'U N �
O U � H
� K
� � V
�O .-1 '�
� a
0
m
' o -
�' Q
� �'.__... � H
H
i .i o a �7
� N ..+ � w
i' 3 .:i o0 G. a
� .�i H ra'.�
F-- � � H
cn x `c�
l� � 4Y
2 � J
�1 c.
�-a m
� �
0
� , ta
;�
N �- U
� � n
0
� W
t•• U � � i i
� 1-1
•� � ? Cn
.� .,� �.�
� °� � r,� 4 A
� O U
; . f-+ ►-, a c�
� . � -� d N
a � � x
y Z o H
� ' "' H
� c �-
:._ ��.� �r,
�
`- W c:
c_ 1-- a
0
c W t'
_ � �
O � M t� tn
(V 1..() L.I7 C i-
\ C.� l0 ci I�
M l.: Gl C�J �:
CJ lD . N •�. !�
l7 C N O M
Gl t� r-- O CC
r-- N M �t M
C' �- �: �.- � �'_.
u i CJ G'� d
(� �l O� lD d'
p� � M � C
p �n rn (� C
L1') r M r-- lI'
t� I� r O CC
r N M Ci' �
�t �..� � � O M t� CJ� �
M ln l0 r tJ' � O M Cl"
N n �, i_c� M O M �D �Y
- c-� c�.: cv c, � v t�
G L: c:- C.~ C7 O J' G� 1�
�Y ^ � u� � M M ( N V' � ,"
`: � c� I _ i c- • ts ; � M, C�: G^. 1�-
- ��, I - _ [�� N M c; lL
� N O CJ t� d' cf' N M
Ol C'') O Li7 l0 CJ N N r
C O �O O M ^ �O N �
�,+- t� r CY' M O� OJ M r-
� M r- N r.Y QO �-
Q
�
d'
�
l0
�
d-
r-
N
�
r
�
Oi J _ _ _ ♦
o= _ _ = _ = _ _ _ - - -
M
r
Ei'►
�n C� 1� i.r>
N 4J CO tS)
M C7 M O
r N N M
Q O O r lD
N O� �' r Ll')
1'� t� r 1� CO
M N � � �
CJ Ol r r d'
lD N Ql I� dl
� � O N �
r r N N N
O� O N l0 O
in o0 � � ��
l'J al O� O �-'
t� I� Ol O M
^ p p �.n �
l.'� �..(� r 1� q
Ol cf (� r- O
r r N N
N O � � �
�O O f� d' n1
� � O� O M
�O O O �D O
O 1� 00 61 r-
Q M �
r
r cf- � l0 I.S) O N Ol I�
r- C� r.- C.� r Ci dl r- Ol
C+� � O� � c^ O ^ � M �
M N r N M �
r lS) r r- t� lf� M N r---
O c`, Ul � O Ul cY' i� i�
tl� � O d'
4 O N (T N d' N O� �
M O d' ^ � O �
N �''i O� O Ol I� � 1�. f�
N N r N �t'
cl- N ct O� t0 O t0 � N
ct d' M r dl N Ol d' lD
►� I� �n CO �D 00 M ci' t.[)
,_. M M M � N �1'� M
N � � a- N N M O
N M t� � I� I.n l0 t-(� l0
N r r N d'
t� M t� M �"' � ^ N O
t c) O lf') lD r i� d'
i� r lD Ol
l0 N 01 M ^
M O GJ tS) CO O� O� N l0
r N d' 1� W 1� l.C) N O
r-- r r N N r'
, _ �
t+a
��`�
n
�
N
r
.�
l!') !
Lf')
�
d''
dl •
�
n
o�
d
O
�
.•
•
••
� 1 �+
�
" � s.
� � �
� � p
r N . � N � `i
ai VI Qi e� r.'_
1: "D N � •r � t
.r. r •r t � N �3 U N s
N •r L1 � f1 -I-� �'3 J � 1 �
RS ) � ([j •1- .
•r rt7 � � O � J � ..0
tn 4J � �' QJ � r- S-. CJ m � � � LL. t/� N «�
Ql �O L� � r- rtY � QJ r- r .r O •r � �' (p�
•r Y •r � � � r ..0 i-� U i"� r X � S.- � 3 S" F
}� C �6 r- O 'r r-- -1-> � �- tn •r i1 +-� C �
•r � r O. O L .r .� �i •r . �.. •r- � (n �-' m G ..
U C C7 U C...� LL. � C] C� c.> W = J J N
7
, � �' l � 1 1 t . s �
' . � . ,
i
} Y_
� 6l N Q^i r- (� N
4i � E+ C7 t1') CO O I� 00
O , J
.. ,x 'a p Ol GY' r- Ql M �
x H M f� h � 1� (:J
�' �-+ � N N �O . n Q� N
� '�' H ^
Q l0 O M M r M
N 11') �:1' r N M
�
�
0
u
� .
M l� tC) CO r- M
Y a N CU C�i CJ O� l0
' µ
p < 1� r 1'� N lD 61
C j.r N C7- r N ct dl
Q t7 � M ct � N O M
� � O M M N M
� N Ln �t � N M
' a
w
�
' o � N
� r
C Q �
� U r-
' � L, V � _ � = _ _ = = ' _ _ _ � = _ � _
� w a � rn
r 3
�v' O
� ^
.1 �--
' M
e---
�
�
, � .
Ol O 1'� et �t' �D
v� Q� M <V O t� M I
W t.v. G a1 O� th O � �'
�
O CJ r M M r r N
�
' �
t� C1' l0 � Ql al '
p� l0 O� l0 dl r CO
U . . . . . .
p N O M O �.S') O
p a I�. M � I� � I�
�"' Q ��j O M ^ 1� t.C) c1^
'4 a uf l0 CO tC) (� � N d�
F' �,',"�j r N N r- � r
Z �
w
�
Z �
' �
u
�
0
.�
J x o CJ 6� tf') t.f7 l0 lfl
Q
C�. � d N t� r CO Ln r^
O �-c tn O N �n M Cp
� J U�% H N M f� r 61 O
< .. � �
"^ N'" V-'- I� M I� r- C�J
'L.3' �-t V r N N r- r-
� � C:
U a
�
�
d �
�
I '
�
� ?a Ol G' d' l0 f� r
�-+ a� t� Gl r- cf- � N
'T' r. r.� c? . . . . . .
N o c� p� N N N Ol d�
Z ' i � j r N I� r �3' 0.7
.. � ••t q 0. W O � lJ l^✓ � C' ^
i-- •'C G � r r r^ �--
.D H
7 C1 W
CA X R'
� A' � w
-' N � __—i ' � (____. i I .
�y >
� d
�i � �J
�� � �
C! �-- U
1 ~ �
�� W
° U �, �-: -
r`• C: U
� LL T; r<
c, t`-
.�i O � ��
.� ..i f c
,� - c
.. V -.. i"7 Gi
N � � � V7 � >
i� � �c TJ O
o� � , �°�-, ?� _O r[5 O � a
'� � o ty c _J O U' N
� ~ �+ r-- C1 C � `L N
t.. G: t� �.. :- :;� .r- -- �
� L.1 c: (� U L7 _. _ J O C�
� __
,....'�_.._�-'7... �. I I
; ._
l� r
t.7��
sta j
�3-
Ql
A1
�
u
O •
�'
. lf')
r--
N
�
�
�
�
�
N
M
�
�
d'
N
�
N
O
r
�
d'
M
. �
�
N
N
, f�;
��
r
O
t/1
��
N
v
�
�
d
1
�ri
T
�
�� � C) (
I '
P.E.R.A. Fund
' , Taxes $ 58,375.00
Firemen's Relief Fund:
Insurance Refund 13,922.00
, Taxes 17,250.00
Police Pension Fund:
Taxes 56,396.00
, State Aid Fund: 140,000.00
Debt Service:
Civic Center - ?axes 35,500.00
Parks - Taxes 44,4Q0.00 '
' �365,843.00
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $2,303,688.00
,
-PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
�� ,
�� TH I S DAY 0 F �-�.-�`�� �<--�� "� , 19 71 . �
' .
''
' MAYOR , JACK 0. KIRKHAM
ATTEST:
� -�
,
CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL
'
,
'
� .
�
'
� '
�
� ' .
1
�
'
� :'�
�
�i
'
'
[�
0
i
j� �/ �
� R�SOLUTIOP! N0. v - 1971
A RESOLUi'IO�I REDUCI�iG THE ASSESSPtENT FOR �'HE i970 SERVICF CO��tJECTION ON
PART OF L,OTS 22 ar�o 23, PARCEI. 2530, AUQITQR'S SUBDiVISIOV N0. 77
WHEREAS, the o4•rne�-s of par-t ot Lots 22 and 23, Parcel 2530, Audi tor �s
Subdivision N�. 77, a�er� assess�d $],729.00 for H�ate� and se:•rer taterals
or� September lj}, ]970, under the 1g70 Service Con,�ection assessrnen� ro1l;
AND, tJFtERE�S, it is the poticy of the Councit oF the City of �ridiey to
a1 To�� credi t for the cost of rurrni ng s���r�r ana water conrlections wh�n
the expenses to th� o�ne�- are in excess of the charge for a norma�
residential hook-up;
ANQ, W�fEREt�S, the ow;�ers of part of Lo�s 22 and 23, Parcel 2530, Auditor�s
Subdi v4 si on tv�o. 77, have presented i nformati on fio the Ci ty Ci erk sl�owi ng
thafi they should receiv� $7S0.04 credit; .
NO',�l, THERE�ORE, BC IT RESOLU�D by the Counci t or the Ci ty of Fri d1 ey th�t
the princin�l amoun� of $i,%?_9000 on tn� i970 Serv�ce Co�nection assess-
ment rotl on part of Lots 22 and 23, Parc�l 253�, Auclitor's Subdivisi.on
Noo 77, b� rec�uced by $750.00, and th� ne�� �rincipal antiount wiil be
5979.co.
PASSEO A�� ADOPTEO. BY TI-!E CI fY .COU;lr_Il. 0� TF;� CITY OF FFtI�t,EY TtdIS
�_ DAY Or ____ r'__.._� .. -----------' i 9% 1.
A7f�ST: _
0
Ci i��i 1.�.`�ft �.��-.�.�,�1('�'.'i',+"�.s.._.Ci,.��.:_.. i i
htAYu? �---_—`._,___._._._._ .-_-Jac��v0. Ki rkh�m
�� 1
�
i �
�
1
I '
I
,
,
'
�
' _
'
t
'
'
'
'
'
'
RESOLUTION N0.
��;
- 1971
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING AND COMBINING OF SP�CIAI.
ASSESSMENTS ON PART OF LOTS 2 ANO 3, PARCELS 500, 57�, 680, ANO 700, AUOITOR'S
SUBDIVISION N0. 89
WHEREAS, certain special assessments have been levied with respect to certain
land and said land has subsequently been subdivided. �
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOIVED as follows:
That the assessments levied against the following desCribed parcels, to-wit:
Aart of Lots 2 and 3, Parcels 500, 570, 680, and 7Q0, Auditor�s Subdivision
No. 89, may and sha11 be apportioned and divided and combined as follows:
O�i�cinal Parcet Fund Origihat Amount
Part of Lot 2, Parcel 500,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 89
Part of Lot 2, Parcel 570,
Auditor's Subdivision Noo 89
Part of Lot 3, Parcel 680,
Audi tor's Subdi vi sion No. 89
Part of Lot 3, Parcel 700,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 89
Division and Combination of
Parcels Approved
Parcet 505, Part of Lots 2 and
3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89
Regutar SA (Sewer Main)
W #34 (Water Main)
SW #24 {Sewer Main)
SS #24 (StorM Sewer) '
SW #� 8 (Sew.Lat.S2 Serv.)
SW #8$ (Wat.Lata)
SS #89 (Storm Sewer)
ST. 1968-16--72nd Ave.
Regular SA (Sewer Main)
W #3�'(Water Main)
SW #88 (Sew.�at.)
SW #88 (Wat.Lat.)
SS #89 (Storm Sewer)
STo 196€�-16•-72nd Ave,
Regular SA (Sewer Main)
W #3� iWater Main)
SS #24 (Storm Sewer)
SW #88 (Sew.Lat.�lServ,)
SS #89 (Storm Se��erj
Regular SA (Sewer Main )
W #34 (�dater Main)
SS n39 (Storm Sewer j
Fund
Regutar SA (Sewer Main)
W #34 (;later hlain)
SW �24 (Sea�er Naih)
SS �?.t� ' (;torm Sewer )
SW nE8 ( Se��,.Lat o� 3 Ser�. )
SW #8$ (tilat.lat. }
SS #89 (Storm Sewer�
STo 19rxZ-16--72nd Avee �
S 256004
835.97
212.63
1,103.02
l 0, 37�+.34
4,354.48
812.96
7,472,64
$
$
Sz .74
1b0.79
�,308,80
985.92
375015
1,527.6I
238.86
8 f 6.0 6
1,103002
6,008057
540 .55
$ 52.27
153.95
�+3ooii
0,17�+�"'—"
Original Amount
5 559030
1,828.04
212.63
2,018,53
17,359a71
5,3�+0,40
2,066,88
9,000.25
69
; � �o
. �
� . Pa�e 2
RESOLUTION NOe - 191`ls Authori=ing and Oirecting the Splitting
and Combining o Speciai Assessments on Part o-f Lots 2 and 3, Parceis 500,
570, 680, and 700, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89
Parcel 690, Part of Lot 3, Regular SA (Sewer Main) $ 40.61
Auditor's Subdivision No. 89 W#3�+ (Water Main) 138073
SS #24 (Storm Sewer) 187.51
SU! #88 (Sew.lat.) 1,332.00
SS #�89 (Storm Sewer) 91._ 8�___
�0, i 7�+�'-_
'�
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS �� DAY pF
�� ` t97t
.�::.,_.__.._._.� , •
ATTEST:
CI Y CLFRK Marvin C. Brunse
YO ac�c . i rkham
�
r-,
,��J
i
I
���
�'
i
�
�I
,J
��
,
�
`J
a � `"
RESOLUTION H0. � - i97i
�
.. '�1
A R�SOLUTION AU7HORIZIPJG AND DIRECTING THE COMBINING OF SP�CIAL ASSESSME�7S ON
PART OF OUTLOT i, BLOCK 1, PARCEL 65, AND PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, PARCEL 10,
FP,IDLEY I��OUS7RIAL PARK PLA7 i
W!-tEREAS, certain speciai assessments have been levied with respect to certain
land and said ]and has subseq�ently been subdivided.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as foliotvs:
That the assessrnents ievied against the following described parcels, to-wit:
Part of Outlot 1, 81ock 1, Parcel 65, and Part of Lnt t, 81ock �, Parcel 10,
Fridley Industrial Park Plat 1, may and shall be apportioned and combined as
fo.11ows:
Or�inat Parcet Fund Ori�inal Amount
Part of Lot 1, Block i,
Parcel 10, Fridley Industria)
Park Plat 1
Part of Outlot 1, Block i,
Parcel 65, Fridley Industriai
Park Plat i
Combination of Parcels �"
Parfi of Lot 1 and Outlot 1,
Parcel S0, Fri�'ey Inc4us�rial
Park Plat 1
Reguiar SA $
W #34 (Water Main)
W #34 (Water Lateral)
S41 �2�t (Sew.^.r Mai n)
SS #24 (Storm Sewer)
Sio 19d5-2 Street
ST. i969-1 Street
1971 Servi ce Conno (Se�l.tat. )
Regular SA
W #34 (�rlater Mai n)
W #3�� (Water �at�rai}
S1�! #24 (Sewer Ma� n)
SS #24 (Storm Sewer)
Fund
Regu�ar �A
W �; 3'+ (�,Jater Mai n)
W #34 (+,�Iater Lat°rai on
73rd) .
W r34 (W4ter Lateral on
�ast Si de)
S�d �r24 (Se:•��r ;1ain)
SS `�?4 (Storm 5�s�t�r)
ST. I9�5-�'- Stre2t
ST. 1959-1 Street
i971 Serv. Conn.
, �
AD�?��D BY TNE CITY C4UNCIL OF T�ic CITY OF FRIDL�Y. T�lIS �
' _____' � .'`° �'�...�!____^_.. _ , ' 9 i 1. �
-__---k�
�
ATT�S7:
' CI i Y CL�R�i Marvi—''n C. �runsel i
82.15
251.65
878 000
176.72
921.$2
1,420.Q0
3,59g.40
2,413.67
$ 31046
57•$5
i53.63
22,66
83.15
10,090.i��
Ori c�i nai Amount
$ 113.�D
309•50
878.00
153. b3
19903$
1,004.�%
1,420.00
3, 598 .00
2 413.67
i0,090.�
DAY OF
;�;aY�a _'_.__ ���!� oa �; r�n:,�;
�2
i' ..� .
RESOLU"fTON NOo r - 1971
A RESOLUi IO�t CORR�CTING R�SOLUTIOh! N0, 163-196g (RESOI.UiION COtdFIR�tIF:G
ASSESSMENiS F'OR ty69 S�RVIC� COP;!�;�CTIO�dS) BY WITHUR�,1�I*�G THc ASSESSr1�t�;T
FOR SE4JcR A�1D ldATtR LATERP.LS O,d TH� 1�'ES7 60 FcET 0�' LOTS 22� 23, 24,
AND 2$, BLOi.K %, SPRItv6 at?OOK P�RK ADDITIOtti ---- ��
WHEREAS, a certai h speci al assessment for s,rater and set�rer lateral s rtas
levied �•lith respect to tiie ti�est 60 feet of l.ots 2?., 23, 24, and 25,
Biock 7, Spring Erook Park Additian, in the amaunt ofi $702.60 on the
1969 S�rvice Connection assessment r�lt;
AND, WH�REAS, the;e has heen an error in certifyirig this speciaT assess-
ment as the property invO�VECIIl3S already been assessect for water and
sewcr laterals,
N041, 1'HEREFORc, 6� IT P,ESOLVED as foi lo�.��s: that the totat amount of
$707..60 on the wesi b0 feet of Lats 22, 23, 2IE, and 25, Biock �, Spring
Brook ParF; Ac�di ti an, be r�sci nc�ed.
PASSED AhD ADOPiED BY TNE CITY C�UNCI± OF 1�HE CTTY OF FR�DLEY THIS
'� ,� `�
� � DAY 0� � �' � , i971.
,,.-�
aT��si:
hiaY� ;_�_�_�_ _..,.__.__.______� ��ci:~ 0, Ki rkt�am
Cl1Y CL�U;;`_.______._.._h;arvir� �',--;�-��1���-1-i-
��'1
I`.'�
'
RFSOLUTIOPd NOo - 1971
A RESQlUTION AUTHORIZIP�G AtVD DIRECTING THE COMSINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON
PART OF LOi' t, BLOCK 1, PARCEL 40, AND PART OF OUTLOT 1, B�OCK 1, PARCEL 50,
FP,I DLEY ItJDUS7RIAL PARK PLAT 1
WHER�AS, certain speciai assessments have been levied with respect to certain
land and said land has subsequently been subdivyded,
NOlJ, THEREFQRE, BE IT RESOLUED as foltows;
That the assessments levied against the foilowing described parcei, to-wit:
Part of Lot 1, Block 1, Parcel 40, and Part of Outtot 1, Btock 1, Parcel 50,
- Fridley Industrial Park Plat t, may and shatl be apportioned and combined as
foliows:
'
' .
'
�.�
�
'
'
'
,
'
Ori�nat Parcels
Part of Lot 1, Block 1,
Parcel 40, Fridtey Industrial
Park Plat 1
Part of 0utlot t, Block 1,
Parcet $0, �rid]ey Industrial
Park Ptat 1
Combining of Parceis Approved
Part of Lot 1 and Par� of
Outlot 1, Q1oc!: 1, Parcti L�5,
Fridiey Industria] Parl; P1at ]
Fund
Regular SA (hlains)
W �34 (Main)
SIJ #24 (Main)
SS #24 (Storm Sewer)
Regutar SA (Main)
W #34 (Main)
W #34 (Lateral)
S4! #24 (t�1a i n )
SS #�24 (Storm Sewer)
STo 1965-2 Street
ST. 196g-1 Street
Si. i970-4� Street
Fund
Regutar SA (Mains)
4J �34 (tiai n j
'� �3�} �l.at�r>> )
S!�! �`21� (tlai n)
SS i�2L� (Stc�rm Sevrer )
ST, t965-2 Street
ST. 19o9-i Stre. t
ST. 1;70-�;� Str°eLt
ADO?TrD THE CITY CCU;�CIL OF THE CITY Or FRIGL�Y THIS
!. `�:; 1971
"_._.. �__._� •
,
�+��`$T:
'
�i'iV C tRK � Marvi n C, vrunse
'
Original Amount
$ 2.59
6.59
�t.86
21.18
$ 2,829.50
8,517004
8�275.t7
3,137.01
30,471.20
6,z76,4o
21,372012
5,723.9�
��3j.�
Or�in�T Amount
$ 2,832.09
8,5?3.63
8,275.17
3,141087
30,492.3s
6,27G.4o
21,372.12
SL723.9�+
3`.�, �.3 7 .'�o _.�
��� DAY OF �
t��'ft'„? -- _....__-____ Jac�c 0. i�i CKlI?iTl
0
. ,�3
C L A I M S
0
12-2�-%1
GENERAL: #27132 through #27284
LIQUOR: #62Q0 through #6255
�
��
i ,
I� ' CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES TO BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL AT TI�IR REGULAR MEETING
� ON DECFMBER 20, 1971
, ' GAS SERVICES APPROVED BY
' LaMa.r Plumbing & Heating Tnc. .
4089 West Broadway
Minneapolis, Mi.nnesota By. Ra.ndall Lane Plbg. Insp.
' HEATING
LaMar Plumbing & Heating Inc.
' 4089 West Broadway
Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Randall Lane Plbg. Tnsp.
' OIL HEATING
LaMa.r Plumbing & Heating Inc.
4089 West Broaclway
' Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Randall Lane Plbg. Insp.
SIGN ERECTOR 1972
' Schubert Outdoor Advertising Company
2508 East 25th Street
_ Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Lawrence Schubert Bldg. Inspo
'
�l
I '
�J
�
� ��
Multiple Owelling Licenses to be approved by
City Council, December 20, 1971 September i, 1971 to September l, 1972
�� 1
Name Address Units. Fee A roved b
' A. C. Mattson 157 M+ssissippi pl. 4 10.00 � F+re Prevention
6320 Riverview T�rrace
' Fridley, Minn.
�
A. C. Mattson t20 Mississippi 4 10.00 Fire Prevention
'6320 Riverview Terrace �
Fridley,.Minn.
Douglas K. Jones 5g8o - 2nd St. N.E. 4 10.00 F+re Prevention
'3947 Arthur St. N. E
Minneapolis, Minn.
��
' Morris Ovick � 541g - 4th St. N. E. 4 10.00 Fire Prevention
Hickory Drive '1
' Fridley, Minn. �
��
�
�
�
� '
'
_ _ _ _ - _ _ . .� .�.. ..;
� LIST OF LIC�idS�S TO BE APPRO i�D $Y THE CITY COUNCSL AT Tz'r,', .�IEf�TI��r OF DF'CE"�B�;R 20� 1�71
� -- - °- ��
.
Ii' � � .
I;' CHRI5�i�iAS TRF,� L�T APPROZiED BY
Bob�s Produce Ranch
7620 Universit;� Ave.
. .�.
I' Fridley, Minn. ' By: Green uian� Home ?�c Garden Centex Fire Inspec�or
[
_ � FOOD ESiABLIS?-L'�I�i�TT
4 __.___ - _ J
� Jansont s Qualit;r I�leats �
620 Osborne Road
i� Fridley� ?'�inn. By: Ches�er Janson Health Insnector
PD� Food Store
,' ' 620 �sborne Road
� FridZey, P�finn. By: �?nQ Food Stores of T�iinn. Health Insnector
� 0�'F SALE BEER
PD� Food Store
620 Os'oorne Road �
� Fridley� I���inn. By: George Hatch Health Ins;�ector .
CIGA� FT`t�
� Ff�� Food Store
620 Osborne �.oad
' Fridley, Piinn. By: PDQ Food Stores oi i-tinn. Police Chief
USFD C���. LOT . �
' Viking C'nevrolet
75�1- Hw.Y • 65
Friclley� P-Iirin. . By: K.G. Isaa.cson Buildin� Inspector
� '
'
,
�
,
'
' -
' �
ESTIMATES TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL - DECEMBER 20, 1971
Weaver, Talle, & Herrick
316 East Main Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
December Billing for Services Rendered
Soil Engineering Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 35108
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 ,
Soi.l Borings - Streets in Industrial Park
Between BN Railroad and T.H. ��47, 79 -
85th Avenues, Fridley, Minnesota FINAL
Suburban Engineering, Inc.
6875 Highway No. 65 N.E.
Minneapolis, Minnesata 55432
Staking of Utilities in Innsbruck North
Pro ject ��103 (PARTIAL)
Inspection Time through I1/24/71 for construction
of utilities �in Innsbruck North Project ��103
��
_ /
$ 2,871.70
$ 10,446.19
$ 1,632.11
$ 1,285.94
r
'
I ' ,
,
.' . .. . . . . . . .
,CNARLES R. WEAVER
HHRMAN L. TALLE
VIRGIL G. HERRICK
.� ,ROB6RTMUNNS
JAMES D. GIBBS
FREDERICK W. KEISER, JR.
,'PATRI�CK J. ROCHE, JR.
WILLIAM K. GOODRICH
' City of Fxidley
� • W
i
v
LAW OFFICES
WEAVER, TALLE & HERRICK
Decembex 9, 1971
� November Retainer
' CATV Redrafting of Ordinance
Lawcon Par1z Applica�ion
�L.iquor Store Opexation
' Burlington RR - Par.� Constxuction
San. Sewer Proj. #93
Repair & Improvemeni Proj. #104
• 5� . Imp. Pro j. ST 1972--.1 &
' ' ST 1972--2 (�7SAS)
' District Court Appearance
School liistrict #Z6 condemnation
� � Temporary Secretarial Servi ces
1
I .
'
'
I
' �:
'�
f �
_ �
316 EAST R1AIN STRE6T
ANOKA. MINNESOTA 55303
421•5418
December b.tlling
2Z hours
5 hours
2 � hours
2 hours
1 hour
1 hour
2 hours
34� hours
TOTAL
$1,450.00
.I,207.50
75.00
139.20
$2,871.70
.
C01�STOCK & DA�f 1�, I N�.
1446 COUNTY ROAD "J"
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNES�TA 55432
T E L.: 784-9346
COiz;SULTti\!G EiVGtt'�[�CRS
_ November 29, 1971
0
__Mr. Hasim Qureshi, City Engineer
-City of Fridley
643I University Avenue, N.E. _
Minn�apolis, Minnesota 55432 �
D°ar rir. Qureshi:
Enclos�d here�•�ith is a copy oi the final bi.11 of Soil Engineering Services,
Inc. fc�r soil borinos and analysis in cor.nection with Project No. 102.
You will note that the bi1Z is slightly hi.gh�r than tl�e estimate. This
� increase was caused by additional use of the CriE-�ES truck-mounted po�aer
augex, and an over-run oi tin� in preparation of the report by Soils
En�ineer (E.z.T.).
Shoul.d you have any qu: stions, please co,ztact t�ir�. Br.�:un of the So�l
Engineering Serviccs, Inc. I`ni st�re they woulcl d�prec.iate prompt paym�nt.
Ver.y truly yours,
, ," COi4510Ci; F� DAVIS, INC.
, �
$y____:�.':._ �'` �;' /,.� � -� �-_��.��
E.V. ComsLock, P.F.
EVCfpL�p � �
Encl.
cC: Soil F��i.t�ceri_n� S=;.�icus, Inc.
�.
0
�o
. :
' - : � . ' �
', , � .. . � . ' � ' • . -
� .
.
. .
. . _
_ ... . ...__ __ . . ' .
G
, __..____. - --- - --- . . y�
. _ . .. _ _: _. `_ _ _ .. .,_ _ . _.l
i. __ __ ......_ -__ _._ __ __..._ .. _. _ _ --••-- - • t__..:..
i ' .
i SO/L ENG/NEER/P�IG SEl�'V/CES, /NC. �
; �
� -�---�-.��-.. .. _ ,.........._..x-,.,�,_�,,.�._..,�
t� „�-- •
P.O. BOX 35108 MINNEAPOLIS, MINN 55435
i
; ��� y
;. � . � �-= , -
.�
� ,
I
� Nov. 16 1
t T�City of Fridley Dote _ �
971
� c/o Comstock � Davis, Inc. 71-32�5 SOIL BORINGS
�' I446 County Road "J" Streets in Industrial Park
� St. Paul, Minnesota 551I2 _ between BN Railxoad and
� � ' , '��, ' � T.H. 47, 79 - 85th Avenues
,
, , _ . " ' " Fridley, Minnesota
M
a
Sept. 8 - Oc�. 29 - - _.
C1�1E-55 core and auger drill, mounted on Flextrack-
Nodwell FN160 rubber-tracked carrier to permit
access to lower areas, equipped wi�h hollow-stem
augers, with soils technician, operator and helper,
taking penetration test borings or Shelby-tube
samples .
149 hours X $55.00
CME-45 truck-mounted power auger, with opera�or and
soils technician, taking potiaer auger borings
33 hours X $28.00 �
Lab Tests: Mechanical Analysis 4 X$].2.50
Engineering Reconnaissance, plotting data,
,.Analysis, Report and Recommendation Service by:
Soils Technician 32 3/4 X�11.25
Soils Engineer (E.I.T.) 54.25 X �15.00 '
Soils Enpineer (P.E,) S X$19.00 I
�,_ E� ,. �"• TOT�IL,
�'-� -c'-v�,.� �, i ; �;� _..f- - �� 1�
(Sz< <������: t� c,�_��� �c� - �_� . -� ,:._.,,,��, `.
C'�:-u:.��_ C<' 1u�.�..r_ _ � <"L <L-�_� ' �—�r' %E 19 � � �
- � �—:z � � , i
,
. . '�
G.,
�
�$8195.00
924.00
50.00
368.44
813,75
95.00
. �
$10,446.19
.±
i
1
� Final Plat P.S. #71-03:
Innsbruck North 2nd Add. �!�
� - . Phase I and II �ox Townhouse A�
�
k� � � � � �
i
i �
; .
i � .' - ' vas•ss:ra r�r •: � srecc�
� r �,. � � • • =- \ � �. �pilffil>//PI �
� �' �t "'�.— NCd6B � �»' ��� J , � w _ I.
� ♦ v � / 1
' � .s. :L, ! p,r_-- + a �
"� � ;,
R • s 1 ' -:.-Iw. ` I� ' 1.
' � � � - OTN �V�MU .
� ^�m' � �
i. t�*' � " ;�_ �� , b�� ti'L
, : �4 , n �,: F�- . � .. .
� � � °" � � ,� ���� � ..
�.,� � �.
yi IN .��� 09 \�
t � 1i '�::� . �..
. � �',�•_:: ::: � � ..
..' �r „ ' � R R&d f \� � � R / c � � �(� 6 L` � . . .. ,
' ; ,, • I�eoi; ��. � t • 8 � T � .... yy�_
`° � ,\ L, '
�. ' '� • � 'p` AUO TO 5 5 � � \ I • .
,\ � �
„
. � � �� � t . � y ,� p � .
. � 1 t'•j;::. • N ,I133�' � ie � C�N � . ' I + � . .
� '' �:5�%?:±:5::: � , 9 � .
. . :':�', i t:: A I I .
- ;;;; r, J4� � ` :- l \
- .
� -^--.' - - . � _ P • �
�ra' '^ R' r
!� �' i
�r+ Mtt v'-.y. (� ri M/ . ..oAiv .
� '� � i • ' ,
b ^ �' ^ � � K )� l J � .
w^� yl � � � , , � : i 1^� M'CRI1C..�
' • �,r� ' V .
`n'��� V'� ' �o'' �� a.:. �4�.',- :'_ "a, °'� �
R � r � r •a',�. . / ; .. % � J � c : �• I7 � Sr'.
�� +4+ � .. ' v, � ,.
♦ i � r /� :i :;I �4 �
�n ti � c � � ;.: y�" , `.:''��t �iRii/i G • �
� _ � E ' �.' , , : „_,���.����°�a v :, r �! �
. � � �� . s o � o±. "�. e�aaG �, -� ,� 4y
•�. ° t9 _ a
J! V � � � f '� v p a�! { �.. � � / � �� �� '
>r,.��,. .. ,. � i Pi?G9+0 ' �(, �A." r � � ,
, � . . '
v y P'E' � N f ^r-�,}, i i t� i.�Ya�� '
C t ' I � GRACE CA7HOi.IG , v'� +
� ' � ' i i MiGH SCHOCL —� ��� , i
� � �, � ^ . } Nti �' _ � � Y �!, a � � ,Rrs,J �i ^ �. a i l tY � � 1 }.Pa3F� .
� r � , ; � � � F� i.:' :�;j Q ,,j..�-� f
+�.• ; ��., „ � � 0� � �— �
. `e �"�' � ;�j n��;�0 ,5�
, .� : ' i q r."..:v' �`� �� � Ly'�� rr 6��C. C3' 1 1 �..
��. ;;, � . ; � � a�-�-_-�i J � �; ���� s�az4 � ��rN sr �
:t:: , -. ,�L�� r'` � •a�- ',�' � � •
: �� -k�ti w�:'� , � � `t1 .
:i t .. ��itl ° �Rt?n)rr�k _ �-- � �
' � ', r� ' i/ � -- Fil._ ._ E4S[HENT '_
`.�.'a' T��Ry � f FrrPa � •4-,, � � � \ / �..
� � rS �r"ic.. � i' '- r�� '� V.�"__
.cn��, � �' �'R ��cs. �� � � � IA.9 i�...S �"i9T1 `-3 ��: �.i i...] ,r.�j -.__ TO SILVFR LrlKE RD
. 4S :'. � 4 +5 2 . .
� �l� r.,� h� �'"�+r -�!'��C�,�"� Ip. I ; �.�7� � � �
�� � �� r--�� � I n
(: � /
U �.} j
' ! 5� � !'� �"L9 'x� I � // � ~ .
�o - ' fl
�, � ��� ���r��,� ,�1`-y� � ' j -
' �;�''�:' � : � 1% � `� � > :� ` .
- ��N •I,�tl N� �H � .^J! ��::� �'9 ��� �� ` '
K i� �. .
� v �
� _b�'� ��.y.,l �� - � \ . .
, ' r 1 ..;.' �= • \Z
r o � ��T ��-,.� I ::: : � �
� °'° <.f '" 5�-!� -� -�;� .��♦ ��� ♦
ry- , �.�� '.
`,\r \� `J���• .i� �{ � 1T� /0 I� i,��r� �_._`'r. �` �..".'�.-�. ...�.� � r
\. '- E` "i •` .! �
' :\\\���.`�� ,�L � ',— -L-. � � , �-'"_--1__ ?--- ==1.'�--_ -- --- - �. r-�-� _ � `�/�
\. . \ � �V � ti ' _. . t , �' ; � ' --�' '. "' _ "
�VAA��� i � L- - - L �� A � � i�4 f"^ � � `! I� � � - - � -� _.�__� —_ i
�\���� ,.; � I '�+ � �r�� �.rr �.� � � ��, 4i rya, , I ��� ,\ � I �•��� . � �'J _ "1`---- �
� !J�%£� S -^1 f � '` � �r+ � -� -� �- r �=� � � � � ���� vr �/ 7 c, _L. �. � �
.� � � � �' � .�� � . --1- � .� � �.�g��( � - j �) �L� / � � j /�� � A'� 1 i
�\\���\\'• ��; �� �i.:{--- .1� `\ Ly,_ `� ,.�' i�rs.�,�! -��, J ]�� � � _'� �
\ \` � � _ , � � �. S' ir , , %�.�1��4 � �
\�� � ;. 1 . � � i _ ;.�. i�+� � �7 Ol�. ��% � '� / .l ,� � ��0. .
��\:•� \ \\ t c i�t • �•� r ��^ �.I � � t `�,'`. / yr'� � 1 °i } :, ��'°�.`°�
`� �. -'�'�,.� � '�'1 �
� ;:. � �� � ,� . ._�� . ''." `, r�. .,`. " - . � }�.� ; a��� %�"�y`Z'.�.��❑,�r � ; � .
,f et-C*' ( I �J � �
:_44'..::�?..:' . ..1•!•' y y7 (�1�(;�-'.�"�,��i yy .;�L�L fi_-7 F�L i:� ..=,/ `' . � !, '• i ;�1 t' :.__�
. '' C i T Y-` , U'a I�T S I� "� � .
s ls�u�, a , . ., . � . .
_ . �.
�' ' ' • •� � �„c�O ?r' . ARCHITECT'S
� APPLICATlON �OR PAYMENT n,o 3 DATE ` COMM, n�o: ���
� Fat o�EY Vot,uNrEE�z Ft REr.{E!V � S REF i EF AssH. " �
� TO '
� OWNER,,
i, This Application is for—� a � a ment f G E t� E R A l C 0 P! S T R U C T( 0 N
, p y o r w o r k d o n e o n y o u r
;'� FRI Dl FY �/�U�l"t (` 1 PA1 �4RACF . �„
_, project from- 11-1-71 to_ 11 . 30--71
.
'
' •
'
�
�
'
, '
�ESCRIPTION OF PROJECT WORK 17EMS
GENEfiAL CONDITIONS
DEMO�. t T 1 ON
EARTHI'!OR K
CQNCRETE—F7G. �'G P'1 �R
SLas
RE—S7EEl. R MESN
PRECAST PC COPlCRETE
B�ocK - BG
B�ocK - AG
Si"RUCi. �: �UIlSC•
CARPENTRY �
ROOFING u�: INSULA7tOM
CAULK) t�iG �t U�I�S
HM &, NAR�V/ARE
0'H�ao DooRs
CEIfENT ! 7 1 OUS GOAT 1 fUGS
PAINTlNG
F�REF'IGHTING DEVtCES
Orginal Con;ract TotcJs
Add Change Orders Totais
Deduct Chang�� Ord�rs Totals
Totais to Date
--_ =;
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
5400
300
3�00
22��
6600
i�oa
15200
2�00
?500
9900
� Z�0
5500
300
900
5500
1�00
2300
190
.� :-:-;�� U�.1
i �� a
COMPLETEO COMPLETEU
TNIS PERIOD TO RATE
1,080.00 4,320.00
150.00 300�00
680000 3,230000
-» 2,200000
6,600.00 6,600.00
385s�� ���O�e��
15,200�00 15,200.00
- 2�400.00
1,125v00 6,375.00
- 9,900.00
'1,425.00 1,425.00
.. ..
270.00 630.00
� 1�
1,274.00 1,27�.000
-- 190.00
�
BALANCE
TO FINISH
1,080.00
_y _
170000
�
.,
..
..
.,
1,125.00
M
?5.00
5,500000
300.00
270.00
55ooeoo '
26.00
2,300�00
_
, Less Retainag� at 'J O % _' _ 5 �j � !1 o r.Q - - �
----�--
' CERTIFICATE fOR PAY�` cNT Y ', _ __ --^ J--
' Total to b Dr n o Date r a
Ea-��d on ou; obserr �c�s, tPus a pl,- :�n for � _,
co�':ct !�� t` _ _._. ^° ._. _ � �._.;�, _, � ,!„ . . -n'.. ���I -C �------ --- --� - ��-6-�0 -.-_----------
i..���_�._� .�___ v - -- - . -------- ---�------- —__�— S �-� > �'J, � --------
. � „i'��t, ( % I
i .. . . _. , . .
4 -- "-' � -
_ . _ _ _ , � . . _
� , ,
�, �
Pr�'cct h_c, t 1 . , � . _
c . db _-- n ,, -
- -- T i� o I . . . .
.- �-- -_____-- --. -- ,s t c_, tr�:;t a. .o,.. li. .d ,, c� h . �,� .
I J ' �- - -- � ,��; . , i>. _s b.en eomp,.t...i �n aceordan,e �.ti�,h enn, .ct Co�..,.-..r :
� �•, / �-�� � • and !`ut a;l la:v`� ' � � � �
�I cti...,_; `or I::;or, m�t^,�i-�.. etc., fur ��:hich pravious ee;tif:cah�s ha�:c 5�;:n i.;c �'.
� � i � / hav� b,:en p�id.
This form checked b l_�: �_. �__ _�<. ____ �__�
�
- r!
ta /1 h�
. "i ) A I
' ' t 0�� � i..:��,,�._>; �.:��n CC�r;��a�lY
Fn�cfi EF;��r<�:n� rn,c.���av � f���,�:,o�v, i?�-:. Contr�ctor---- `- -- -- -----------------_---
(,� nr�c�-�rr�. � r_: nn:o c-:,�rt+ . /
� ' ! ,, ') L � • �
a
�
'
'
�
'
C�
'
. /
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALAB.AMA
___.__ __ Notice to all municipalities and public agencies who own and operate water distribution systems.
__ Re; Claims arising £rom direct or indirect purchases of cast iron pipe and fittings.
Gentlemen:
The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, by its Director of Law Charles E.
Griffith III, has filed a lawsuit which is presently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Alabama, Southern Division, against certain manufacturers of cast iron pipe and fittings and against an
association of such manufacturers, namely:
American Cast Iron Pipe Company McWane Cast Iron Pipe Company
Amsted Industries Incorporated Mead Corporation
Clow Corporation United States Pipe and Foundry Company
Glamorgan Pipe & Foundry Company Cast Iron Pipe Research Association
Lone Star Steel Company
Seeking treble damages, the complaint alleges that those defendants violated the Federal Antitrust Laws by
conspiring and acting in concert to £ix prices and allocate markets in the sale of casi iron pipe and fittings within the
' period 1945-1970 and that, as a result of such action, public agency purchasers of cast iron pipe and fittings have paid
higher prices than they ot}�erwise wonld have paid. The defendants deny that an illegal conspiracy or agreement ever
existed and deny any and all liability. The Court has not passed on any liability issues in this case.
�
' ��
,
'
�
'
'
'
'
I i
�
�'I
I '
�
The suit was filed on behalf of all municipalities and public agencies which own, lease or operate water
distribution systems and which have purchased cast iron pipe and fittings from the above defendant manufacturers
either directly or indirectly through contractors or distributors. On August 24, 1971, the District Court determined
that the suit should be maintained as a class action on behalf of all such municipalities and public agencies and
that notice should be given to such municipalities and public agencies.
Pursuant to Rule 23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, you are hereby NOTIFIED:
1. Unless you request exclusion in the manner provided below, you will be treated as one of the plaintiffs
in the case. The plaintiffs are represented by the Director of Law for the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and
Davidson County, Tennessee, and by Lee A. Fceeman, Esquire, Special Counsel. You may however, if you prefer,
enter your appearance in the case through other legal counsel retained by you.
2. If you desire to be excluded from the lawsuit,you sheuld so indicate on enclosed Form No. 1 and mail it
to the Clerk of the Court, in time to be received not later than January 3, 1972.
3. If you fail to request exclusion, you will be treated as a party to the litigation (v�hich may include your
being subjected to pretrial discovery and, if the case is lost, youx prorata share of the court costs) and will be bound
by the judgment in the action whether favorable or unfavorable. You will, hotirever, be precluded from any award or
recovery unfess you furnish the irformation requested on enclos�d Form �lo, 2 ar� mail it to the Cierk of the Court
in time to be received by him not later than January 3, 1972.
All inquiries and communications in connection �vith this notice ;hould be addressed only to the undersigned
Clerk of the Court, P.O. Box No. 2222, The file in this case is available for inspectien in the Clerk's Office.
Dated: November 5, 1971
By Order of: Sam C. Pointer, Jr.
United States District Judoe
Wiiliarn E. Davis
Cle:k of the Uriited States District Court
for the Nerthern Di;tri�t of Alabama,
Southern Division
P.O. Box Nv. 2222
Birmingharn, Alabama 35201
lJ�
M �
! �
' .
' �
r
C'
�
FORM NO. 2
Cast Iron Pipe Questionnaire
(Must be received by January 3, 1972)
To: William E. Davis, Clerk
United States District Court
P.O. Box No. 2222
Birmingham, Alabama 35201
1. Since January 1, 1966, have you purchased cast iron pipe (which includes both cast iton and cluctile iron
pressure pipe as well as related fittings) from:
2.
(a) Manufacturers
(b) Contractors (on installed basis)
(c) Dealers
(d) Other
(specify)
On what bases have cast iron pipe been purchased?
(a) Competitive bids
(b) Negotiation
(c) Purchase order (without bids or negoriation)
(d) Other
(specify)
(Check as appropriate)
(a) ��..^
(b) �,
t�) � -�`-
ca) -� ��
(Check as appropriate)
�1,7
(b) ;�,,c
(�) ,�u-`
(d) ,-.ti,r+
3. What is the approximate dollar amount of your cast iron pipe purchases since January 1,1966?
(a) Pipe alone $ �
�} �.�,�+�
(6) Pipe installed � j9 j� C"> `� ���
4. If you have purchased cast iron pipe exclusively () or primazily () from one source, check which
and provide:
(a) Name of source [j` ��"����-_�-
(b) Address . �",o l�, ti;c'� �:,� C�4 Y'Z
C� C �..u.�
{c) Person(s) dealt with �-
5
1 _.
�
' �;
Provide the following information concerning the person(s) who are most knowledgeable concerning
your purchases of cast iron pipe since January 1, 1966:
Name Title Current Business Address Period Involved
Date %�'/Z�• �i (
^
��, . -,
�c� �� '. �=-� � !.:t�. (':�? <.
N�me of�Municipality or Public Agency
Signature of authorized officer
Typed or printe name o person signing
Tttle o� p�rsoa s:�nir.g
(� [, 7. A 1 ' - �1 ._ � , —
- , •�f''.o.';'"� I�'�c. L �C.
_ S[reet Address
�.
�►� „_ � -;n, ,�_'s t); � �:�• - �5�132
City State , Zip
�"�,� '-•'1'cC'- ��':�C`
` (tlrea Cnde; Tcleph�„ie NuR�ber
�J
_ � _
___._. __ . , ,.
i , _
i � �
� ;�
��)
�'` �� FORM N0. 1 . '.
,
Election to be Excluded . .
' (Must be received by January 3, 1972)
�
TO: William E. Davis, Clerk
United States District Court
i� P.O. Box No. 2222
Birmingham, Alabama 35201
;
i' The undersi;ned hereby requests to be excluded from Metropolitan
�
Government of Nashville and Davidson County vs. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.,
i
' et. aL, C. A. No. 71-289, pending in the Northern District of Alabama (Southern
Division).
i
i '
i
�� Name of Municipality or Public Agency .
i
,
,
! ' .-- ' Signature of authorized officer
r
� � —
j Typed or printed name of person signing
' , ,_- -
Title of person signing
�
� - Street Address
'
Date City State Zip
'
� . •
� �
' .
� COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC.
'1446 COUNTY ROAD "J"
MtNNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55432
T E L.: 784-9346
CONSULTtidG ER9i"slfllfERS
December 7, 1971
Mr, Nasim Qureshi, City Engineer
City of Fridley
5431 University Avenue v.E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
Dear Mr. Qureshi:
The projects that have been finished in Fridley using cast iron pipe and fittings
since January 1, 1966 are listed below.
BIDS TAKEN
7/18/66
12/19/66
3/17/67
S/18/70
8/31l71
10/20/69
3/17J69
3/17/69
12/4/67
2J7/6G
4/13/70
CCINTRACTOR
,
Sandstrom & Hafner
Nodland & Assoc.
C. S. McCrossan
Associated Contractors
Randall & Berglin
D. M. Noyes
Peter Lametti
Robert L. Miller
Suburban Sewer � Water
D. W. Hickey
Berglund & Johnson
PROJECT
79
Melody Manor
Pl
84
98
105
93
90
92
88
75-C
95-Ii
DOLLAR VALUE
INSTALL.
$26,769.00
1,690.90
27,303.00
10,314.45
6,212.b1
46,000.00
33,820.12
11,487.44
30,552.30
TYPE PIPE
Griffin
American Cast
American Cast
American Cast
Clow
Griffin
American Cast
Clow
Griffin
U.S. Pipe
U.S. Pipe
1/28/66 Randall Bros. Shorewood
Shopping 1,904.75 Griffin
Should you have any questions, please contact the writer.
Very truly yours,
C0.•{STOCK & DAVIS, INC.
� ��
� "ii � �'
1'
� By f i � '-' -' � �� y -, ,r" � -_ , =��-�-z,�--"--
Rus�sell Johnso� � �
RJ/mg �
��
�—
I '
�I
t�
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
December 17, 1971
' MEMO T0; MAYOR AND CTTY COUNCIL
: __.._ sg
' SUBJECT: SITE STUDY AND MARKET ANALYSIS OF THE SKYWOOD MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
' At the Council study session of November 29, 1971, a discussion was held on
the problems we are having with the Skywood Store in achieving an acceptable degree
of profitability on liquor sales. The Council indicated at that time that they
desired the staff to obtain the services of a consultant to study the marketing
' . problems at the store and to make some firm recommendations on a course of action
designed to improve the profitability of the Skywood Store.
I'I
�
'
' -_
'
�
'
�
�
'
�
This past week the Liquor Store Manager, Finance Director and myself inter-
viewed two consultants regarding this study. We used as a basis of the discussion
a letter (which is attached), which was sent out to each consultant, asking them
to answer certain questions which we feel are critical in order to enable the
City Council to decide what is the best course of action regarding the Skywood
Store. The proposals of each consultant are attached for your review. The cost
of the proposals for the work were: _
Midwest Planning and Research, Inc. $4,800.00
John E. Cummings $2,100.00
After carefully interviewing boeh consultants, we feel that both are equally
competent to perform this study. Mr. Cummings lists as a field of special
campetence "selection�of retail locations", and prior to starting his own business,
was a director of corporate planning-research for the Dayton-Hudson Corporation
and had responsibility for recommending sites for new stores and shopping centers.
He also has had experience in the publi_c sector during his employment as a principal
planner with the Ci.ty of Tlinneapolis Planning Commission. We feel that Mr. Cummings
is entirely capable of performing this study and coming up with sound recommenda-
tions on questions that I have posed in my letter.
I would, therefore, recommend that you auth.orize the City Manager to contract
for the services of John E. Cummings to periorm market and site study on Skywood
Munieipal Liquor Store for az� amount not to �xceed $2,100. The funds for this
study appropriately c�ao��ld come out of the licjuor fund account. It is anticipated
that the study wi11 take approximately five �y�eeks and the results would be avail-
able to the City Council sometime in February 1972. Part of the consultants job
would be to present the r.eport to the City Council a�d explain his conclusions and
recommendations.
Coricur i.n the ahove recer,?n:end��t:o�.
' ,�^ � ---' -'� _-- . , _
/�/��z,t�.+..,.r �,, lZ!_ =:_:yi_..,
larvin C. Brur,sell, Fi.nance Director
� � � � — -
, ; ; o,
�r -i / . �. '�� -�
i ^i
Robert L. NicGuire, Liquor Store rlananer
Very respectfully,
(��? �1�' �" ' ;
�,'�; � ,� �� `, % . �,.Jcxz �t-�
Gera.1_d R. Davis
City .•ia.na.�er
� : T
, _ � . .
l�c�t o ��ic��Ce
� �
6431 t1NIVER5ITY AVElVUE NE
ANOKA COUNTY
December 13, 1971
anning and Research, Inc.
2101 Hennepin Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405
� and
Mr. John E. Cummings
1420 West Minnehaha Parkway
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409
Subject; Site Study for Municipal Liquor Store
560`-3450 �j�
C3
FRIDLEY, MiNNE50TA 55421
Dear Mr. Cucunings; �
The City of Fridley is interested in receiving a proposal on a study to
- determine the most favorable location of a municipal off-sale liquor store. At
the present time the City operates four municipal liquor stores, as indicated
on the enclosed map, We are experiencing difficulty in sales at Store No. 1 in
the Skywood Shopping Mall, which is located south of I. 694 and east of T.H.;�65.
Enclosed for your intormation are sone figures for this garticular store since
it was opened, and also customer c_n;.ints for a11. of our �iquor stores. As you
can see, Store No, l, during the period January 1, 1971 to November 20, 1971,.
had less than half the number of customers walk into ti�e store as the next
lowest store. "
The questions that we �oould like to have a consultant ans�aer for us are as
follows:
.
1. Should we reduce our number of liquor store operations to three and
discontinue the Skyt000d store? � �_
2. Should �•,e s��ti1c a ne�a locat.ion for the Sl.yt•:ood store in order to increase
the profitability of the store?
3. If a new locati.on is sou�ht, o;i�ere o.ould be the best possible 2.vailable
location within the City�of Fridley, and reasons for�this recommendation?
4. ��7hat is the second best location caithin tY�e City of Fridley and reasons�
r 'i
S. Should we contir.ue the S'::y�:ood store, and. if so, steps we should take to
have i_� reac� an accepta`:l� d��;rt�= o� profitaoility�?
b. (,';ii}' G� .:, t4 c ti�:j :;J:i „_:;ic i...: ?, il �iti7iit2C)]_i2t�'?
�
.
Mr . Jofin E . Cummings
-2- -
_ ' ��
December 13, 1;,�
The City of Fridley has done some preliminary work on site analysis which
could be made available to you. In addition E�e have traffic counts as far as
automobiles using certain streets, and this data, if useful, could be made
available.
In your recommendations as to site location, I would feel that only sites that �
could be readily obtained through purchase or lease would be considered. Addi-
tional 1970 census data is available. I would ask then that the following be
included in your proposal:
1. Time required to complete the study.
2. The total cost of study including one or tcao meetings to discuss the
analys�s with the City Council, if required. We would req.uire about
10 copies of the completed study document.
3. Your method of proceeding on the study.
4. What staff assistance would be required from the City to support� �•
the study.
I would appreciate receiving your proposal as soon as possible as we would like
to start on a site location study in early 1972. I hope this information is
sufficient for you to submit a proposal. Should you have any questions please
call me at 560-3450. .
GRD/ms
Enclosure
Sincerely yours,
�, �
_ '✓ �%i2-c21:'� '� �-LC �"L'�
Gerald R. Davis
City Manager
'
�
r�
�
�
,
'
�
�
'
L_ J
,
' �
�
john �. cumrning�
1420 West Minnehaha Parkway � Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409 � 612-861-3341
15 December 1971
Gerald R. Davis, City Manager
City of Fridley
6431 Univexsity Avenue, N. E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55421
Dear Mr. Davis:
Attached hereto is our proposal for a study of Fridley's municipal liquor
operation for the specific purpose of determining the future of Store No. 1
at Skywood Mall. It has been a pleasure to prepare this material and we
look forward to an early beginiiing on the pro,�ct itself.
Note that the study is directed to your particular need; a firm recommenda-
tion regarding the Skywood store based on thorough and competent market
analysis. The questions in your letter of 13 December were unusually help-
ful in this regard: they have allowed us to trim ouY. much of the background
material usually included in a proposal for setting the stage and defining the
prablem. Your letter also offers the use of matexial in the City's possession,
which has allowed us to reduce the time and cost budget for the study sub-
s tantially.
' We have assumed a mid-January stax•ting date, but are prepared to begin
sooner should you wish. Your acceptance can be indicated by signing and
returning a copy of this letter.
� . Best wishes for the Holiday seasan and the prospect of a beneficial association
in the New Year !
� Sincerely,
�% j /� �� ${ , \ a1 , 1
� �..`:� ; , , , �. . � , , . , -
� 8. � ,
� John E. Cumm�rib��
' �
Enclosures �, „y,!
., J�;C:cta;
�
,
Accepted:
By
L � � C'.
�i
PROPOSAL
PROJECT
Fridley Municipal Liquor Stores
OBJEC TIVE
To achieve a store pattern that will maximize overall profits from the
municipal liquor operation. �
BACKC,ROUND
The problem is outlined in a letter from Gerald R. Davis, City Manager,
dated December 13, 1971.
The principal difficulty is a declining profit margin in one of four stores
operaY.ed by the City (Skywood Mall). This has raised the question, "Would
the overall situation be improved by closing or relocating this unit? "
The proposed study is designed to answer this question, plus six others in-
cluded in Manager Davis' letter. The latter will be taken up in reverse
order, starting with an investigation of why Skywood has low profitability
and.winding up with a recommendation for termination or relocation based
on the o'verall profitabili.ty of the system.
WORK PROGR,AM
We intend to conduct this investigation using a, format that has proved itself
in other store location studies, Work will pro�ress as follows;
I. Compile information on the r�cen� histor.y of:
A. gro�r✓tii of tlie adult poplLlation in s outhe rn Ano�ca, eastern
Henn?pin and northwestern Rarr�sey Counties,
�
�
C
�
the conzmercial development of this region,
travel patterns in the area,
�2
�__. _
. . ._ _ �>. _:�
.
�
,
, -2-
D. liquor store sales--
' l, in Fridley's municipal stores,
2. in competing stores,
' II. Gather information on future developments:
� A. that have already been announced,
B. that appear likely based on a knowledge of the urban economy
' of the Twin Cities. '
, III. Review operation of Skywood Store relative to its competition
(e.g. service level, pricing, hours, appearance) to determine the
possibility of increasing profit through upgrading rather than
' relocation.
IV. Calculate:
'� A. total li uor sales in the re ion in 1975-1 80
q g 9 ,
B. the share of maxket by store,
' C. changes in market shares that will result fxom--
1, clo�ing the Skywood store, -
' 2. continuecl operation of Skywood,
3, relocation of Store No. 1 to two or thxee alternative sites,
' D. total sales of the Fridley stores under each of the preceding
conditions,
� E. profit of the s�ores in each case.
1 V. Other considerations.
Closing or relocation of the Skyz�rood store will undoubtedly affect
' other activities: for e�ampl.e, the sales of the stor�remaining in
the Skyw�ood Mall. Comments regardin; these effects v�rill be
include d,
' IItiF�� �1�I� C�� , �_�',�,��..`_
, The study out-liued above �vill rec�uire five w•eeks for fii].1 e�ecution ar.d re--
porting. Th?s i.ncludes tlle time x•er;uired for study desigri, gathering �and
verificaLion of data, analysis, draftin�; of the te.>t and docun�ent preparatiori,
I , � .
_ ��
�
�
'
,
-3 -
Assuming authorization to proceed is received by 15 January 1972, the
� final report will be delivered on or before 25 February 1972. If authoriza- _
tion is delayed beyond 15 January the delivery date may have to be adjusted -
to accommodate other work in process.
�J
'
�
�
' ..
'
'
'
,
' �`
The City of Fridley will be billed only for the actual costs of conducting and
reporting the study, but not to exceed $ 2,100. These costs include personnel
time, supplies, services, travel and preparation of forty copies of the final.
report. Thus if the time required to produce the analyses requires fewer
hours than planned or incidental expenses can be reduced, the client will be
billed for only the actual time and charges. This total cost includes one
progress report to the City Council (if desired), presentation of the final
report and one follow-up meeting.
This budget also assumes the cooperation of City officers in furnishirig
information on store operations, legal restrictions or requirements, site
availability, etc. that is readily available to them.
REPORT
The final report will comprise approximately 13 pages of text supple-
mented by tables.and maps, The text will contain a summary of our
findings, ihe conclusions we draw from them and a speci.fic recommendation
regarding the future operation of Store No, 1. It will contain direct
answers to the questions posed in the letter of 13 December cited above.
The report will 7,�e a plastic-bound, printed docun�.ent, addressed tothe
Fridley City Council, but written with the need of the general public in
mind as well.
15 December 1971
��
.
�ohn e. cummings
1420 West Minnehaha Parkway � Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409 � 612-861-3341
Fields of Special Competence
Financial Analysis for Property Development
Selection of Retail Locations
Housing Market Studies
New Venture Analysis
Corporate Planning
Experience Highlights
John E. Cummings Associates, Principal: Consultant to business and government for
financial analysis, urban economics, and planning. 1970-71 projects include develop-
ment of long-range goals and a growth plan for a million-member service organization,
market and investment analysis for a 1,300-unit apartment complex, an urban design
study summary for a city planning commission, market and investment analysis tor a
200-1ot golf course subdivision, industrial opportunities analysis for an Economic
Development Authority, and an economic development plan for a central business
district.
Dayton Hudson Corporation, Director of Corporate Planning Pes�arch: Recruited
and directed a 17-man corporate planning staff. Responsible for developing com-
puterized program for selecting cities with a high profit potential, recommending sites
for new stores and shopping centers, supervising comprehensive marketing research pro-
grams to evaluate advertising, c�rstomer desires, and store image, preparing annual
updates of ten-year sales projections based on shifting economic patterns, conducting
field investigations of stores considered for acc�uisition, internal management consult-
ing relative to a high-loss subsidiary, searching for anci indentifying nsw retailing
opportunities.
City of PJlinneapolis Pl�nning Co�arnissios�, Princi;��l Piann�r: Complete responsibility
, for economic analysis with emphasis on incl�astrial and commercia! planning. Typical
projects included preparing a comprehensive plan for a 27Q-acre industrial district in
the heart of a built-up metropolitan area, detailed planning for upgrading three com-
' munity shopping districts, and �vinning support for propased deveioprn�nts by con-
ducting individual anu� g� ou� pr�sentations.
'
�
'
'
'
Union Oil Con,�;±n,r of Czlsic�rr�ia, �n����s�: Reported on the imali�ations of revising
oil tanker financing, re�,�i��vLd alternativ� �rope��ls for leas�-purc�ase of an auto fleet,
and prepared financial data supporting proposed merg2rs.
Castle tic Coo',:e, Inc., O� �rations Ana9��st: Evaluated investment opportunities in rum
production, conducted a profitability analysis of mahogany plantings, prepared monthly
forecasts of cash requirements.
�C,".;�:i;'iiifC �'i''- ��%!�tiCJil
Master of 6usiness Administration, StanforcJ Universiiy
Whar�on Graduate Sci�ool of F�inanc�, Univ�rsity oi Pennsyl��ania
B. A. (International Relations), Uriiversity of California {6erl<eiey)
�.j .
�
�
'
'
'
'
'
'
�
� �
�
�
�
'
'
�
I '
� '
— MInWLST PLANNING AND RESEARCH, IN ��
� A N D C l A N N I N G A N D U R B A N R E S E A R C M C O N 5 U l T A N'
I
2901 Hennepin Building • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 • Telephone: (612) 3743030
December 16, 1971
Mr. Gerald R. Davis, City Manager
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N. E.
Frid(ey, Minnesota 55432
Dear Mr. Davis:
Atfiached is our proposal for determining the optimum number and location of
municipal off-sale liquor stores in Fridley.
As we discussed previously, we have conducted similar sfiudies in Excelsior,
Plymouth and Robbinsdale. We have treated the same subjeci� in Roseville,
alfhough less formally, in our role as consultant planner. .
Both in our p{anning and private research activities we are consfiantly dealing
wifh site location for retail trade. We have a high level of interest in this
type of study and appreciate the opportunity to submit fihis proposal.
We look forward to assisting yau in your effort to upgrade fhe income potential
of your municipal Iiquor program,
$incerely,
MIDWEST PLANNING AND RESEARCH, 1NC.
-� ��",�° � _,�
� �� � ,�,.� �. �
t..���;��.�� ��°�' " � ��'� -��-,, �-
Samuel K. Popplefion
Director of Research
SKP/nd
Enclosure
� Madlson, Wlsconsin 537Q4 Casper, Wyoming 82601
3129 E, Washington Ave. a 136 South VJalcott St,
Tefephone: (60H! ^44-2231 Telephore: (307D 234iS05
- MIDV�iLST PLANNING AND RESEARCH, IN � f
� A N D P t A N N 1 N G A N D U R g q N R E 5 E A R C M C O N S U L T A N
2901 Hennepin Building • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 • Telephone: (612) 374-3Q30
Decem6er i6, 1971
Mr. Gerald R. Davis, City Manager
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N. E.
Fridley, Minnesofia 55432
CONTRACT FOR PRO�ESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES
AGREEMENT this lbth dpy of December, 1971, by and between THE CtTY OF
FRIDLEY, hereinafter sometimes called CLIENT and MIDWEST PLANNING AND
RESEARCH, INC., hereinaffier sometimes called the PLANNER, relating to the
empfoyment of PLANNER, as follows:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The PLANNER proposes to conduct an economic feasibility study relative to the
market for off-sale liquor in Fridley, Minnesota.
The study will address both the potential for sales and an analysis and ranking of
potenfiial retail locations from which the market can be best captured.
The ana(ysis method proposed is:
1.
2.
3.
Delineation of the firade area fiributary to Frid(ey retail site�,
Specification of one or more approximation mefhods for determining probable
retail absorpfiion at a given site.
The parameters considered in the deve(opment of this allocation model would
include:
a. The magnitude and distribution of th� consumer demand.
b. Establishzd c;nd proj�c�ed snopping pafterns within 9�ne City,
c. Regional and (ocal accessibility, traffic movements and park�ng,
d, Affects of adjacent land us�s.
e. Affects of visabi(ity, identity, compefiitive relationship to other outlefis,
relations to pede;;rian circulation, and other mark�ting considerations.
Application of the market absorption model to explain the deviation in performance
among fihe exisPing municipal ou� Iefis.
Madison, Wlsconsin 537Q4 Casper, Nlyomfng 82601
3129 E, Washington Ave. 0 136 South Wolcott St.
Teleptione: (603) 244-22H1 Telophone: (307) ?34-1905
I
I '
�
�
i �
� �
i
i ,
�r
'
,
'
,
'
�
,
�
�
City of Fridf ey
December T6, 1971 page Two
4, Application of the markefi absorption model to identify and rank fiwo or more
potential off-sale sites within fhe City.
The purpose of the study wi(I be specifically to answer fhe questians:
1, V1/hy does the Skywood Store have low sales volume?
2. Should the Skywood Store be discontinued, relocated, or improved in
some way?
3,
4.
Where are the best and second best alternative site locafiions within the
City?
Where is the optimum location for additional storage of liquor and supplies?
The finished report will be presented in ten (]0) copies with the PLANNER available
for quesfiioning and two presentafiions of the findings.
INFORMATION 70 BE FURNISHED BY CLfENT
1.
2,
3.
Sales history of the four existing municipal liquor stores.
Traffic datq, retail sales data, income data,informafiionon site availability,
to the extenf presenfily compiied by fhe Cifiy.
The PLANNER would like permission to conduct brief interviews with the
store managers .
COMPLET(ON TIME
m�
The market study and sifie selection will be complefied within sixty (60) days from the
date of execution of this agreement, unless delayec} for reasons of unexpected emergencies,
forces beyond the control of the parties, or by requesi- of a party, acquiesced in by the
other party.
COST' OF SERVECES
The work performed as out(ined herein will be completed for a total cost of Four Thousand
, Eight Hundred ($4,800.00) Dollars to be paid in the following manner: A retainer in the
amounfi of One Thousand Two Hundred ($i,200.O11) will be required upon submission of
the executed contract• and prior to commencement of the wnrk by the PLANNER. The
, remaining 7hr�� Thou�c:nd Six I-�und,�d ($3,6CO.G0) Dol(a;s s'nall be payable vpon
deliv�ry of i�h�� ;inui��j; in r�;��ri- fo�;-,:,
I �
�
. .
.
City of Fridley
December 16, 1971
PAYMENT
Al) costs incurred wil) be payable to the PLANNER within thirty (30) days of receipt
of a statement showing the work complefed and the cost of said work. To each invoice
not paid within sixty (60) days wil) be added a service charge of one (1) percent per
month for each month delinquenf.
TERMINATION
This agreement may be terminated upon thirty (30) days written notice by either parfiy.,
In the event of termination, the CLIENT will pay the PLANNER for work completed
on a time plus materials basis.
MIDWEST PLANNING AND RESEARCH, INC.
gren, Nresiaent
� � % I �:
;; , ,; �.,, ' 1
-�'"�� James , awks, Vice Presidenfi, Corporate Growth
C(TY OF FRIDLEY
Gerald R. Dqvis, City Manager
P(ease sign and re1•urn one copy
i �-%�����
Date
, . .�lr� ���
/ Date ��
Date
Date
m
��
_ ..;
. _.
' _ _ _
8-79 (REV. 11-3-64)
.' '
(Standord Form of the internationai Association of Chiefs of Police)
(Copies available at Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D. C. 20535)
� CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
i� citY ot �ridle;� Mo�th of November 1971
� ' TABLE 1.--DISTRIBUTION OF PERSONNEL
� Average Daily Percent Daily Average Daily
Numerical Strength Absence Absence Temporary Details Average Effective Strength
I
� End of 'amemonth Samemonth � Samemonth memonih Same rnonth �
� this month last year This mont last year This mor.th last year "1'his mont} last year This month Last month last year
II :' 28 27 g.�72 8. _l_ .0 .28 1 1
Total petsonn�l. r 3 7 14 3.79 3.69
Chlef's offlce . . 1' 1'
'� � �
' � Records bureau . � � �
�
� Y�Uniformed force . �� l� �
i
' Detective biiteau � �
�
�� Traffic bureau . � - -
i
...........
ti
_�� I . . . . . . . . . . . ��� �0 . .
First relief . . .
lz lo
�;� Second rellef . . • �
Thitd rellef . . . ( �
j� TABLE 2.--CHANGES IN PERSONNEL 7ABLE 3.--DAILY AVERAGE PATROL STRENGTH •
- I. Present for duty end of 2ast month .......... 2f � Same month
;� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y -- This month last year
2. Recruited durinq month . �
23 22
• 3. Relnstafed dutlnq month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. To2a1 number Qf pafrolmen . . . . . . . . ,
Total to riccouni for . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2� 2. Less pennanent assiqnmen[s (pubIic
1 of$ces, clerical, chauffeurs, ete.) ...
4. Separatlons from tlie setvice: 3. Less.detafls to special squads o: bu- �
reaus (trafflc, vlce, park, ete.) .
�' (a) Voli�ntaty resfqnation . . . . . . __ • � � � �
4. Averuge dally abser.ces of p�trolmen
(b) R�tlrement on pension . asslyned to patrol duty owing to:
(a) Vacatfon, suspenslon, rest ���5 7� O�
(c) Resiqned with charq.�s; pendinq days, etc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �
� (d) Dropped dutinq probatlon . . . , �
(b) Sick nad tnjured . . . . . . . . . . , , �&0 •��
. (eJ Dismissed for cause . . . . . . . �
� .. ............ ......... �r^�
(f) Killed in line o[ duty . _ • �
(c) Temporary details .
(q) Deceased .
r• n
"I'otal separation : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7bta1 average dally absenc�s . . .�• r� C�.31
. � 5, Present for duf at end of rr:on}}� , , , , , , , , , , , F • 3 • � 7
r _____2� s. A„QizUhi� for patrol duty ........, 1"I 2g 1 E��
' .
, �`
TA�LE 4-- CRIME INDEX AND POLICE ACTIVITY TREND
;
OFFENSES KNOWN TO THE POLICE CHANGE
CURRENT YEAR V5. LAST YEAR
CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES
(PART I CLASSES) REPORTED OR ACTUAL �5. SAME MONTH VS. SAME PERIOD
KNOWN UNFOUNDED OFFENSES ACTUAL THIS LAST YEAR LAST YEAR
THIS MONTH 7HIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE
NUMBER PERCENT NUMBER PERCENT
_ �,
la. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT
MANSLAUGHTER
2. FORCIBLE RAPE TOTAL 2 3
e. RAPE BY PORCE 2
b. ASSAULT TO RAPE - ATTEMPTS 1
3. ROBBERY TOTA� I.O 1 ZI}
u. ARMED - ANY WEAPON �% 1, 11.
b. 57RONG-ARM - NO WEAPQN 1. 3
4. AGGRAVATED ASSAULT TOTAL $ 1'
a. GUN
b. KNIFE OR CUTTING INSTRUMENT
e. OTHER DANGEROUS WEAPON 2 �
d. HANDS, FIST, ETC. - AGGRAVATED
5. BURGLARY TOTAL �-1 �-�- 1�+2 �-2 �6
o. FORCIBLE ENTRY 11 1]. lO9 g �.O
b. UNLAWFUL ENTRY - NO FORCE � ]„�
e. ATTEMPTED FORCIBIE ENTRY 'z0 `Z
6. LARCENY - THEFT (except auto theft) �� 3� j+3�j 31 464
a. S50 AND OVER IN VALUE
7. AUTO TNEFT 7 7 �' S l� 72
CRIME IND�X TOTAL
lb. MANSLAUGNTER BY NEGLIGENCE
4e. OTHER ASSAULTS • NOT AGGRAVATED S E� 7 7 �
66. LARCENY, UNDER 550 IN VALUE 1 5l 7C�5 1. j�
PART i TOTAL 1.15 115 11�61� 122 11�20
TOTAL PARTIIINCIDENTS ................ 80....................................�.7.... ' p I.00O -
TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS NONCRIlAINAL CALLS . Q7L3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �?�..C�.C.f, , , , 1-0� 7 l�- AJ�3
TOTAL CALLS FOR PO�ICE SERVICE . . . . . . .��C1� . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ��':�<.�o . .. 1327 1-3! 73�
AUTOhiOBILES REC04ERED
(A) NUMBERSTOLEN LO�ALIY AND RECOVEP.:D LOCALLY ............................................... �ry
(6) NUMBER STOLEN LOCALIY AND RECOVERED BY OTFIER JURISDICTIONS ...... .... ......... ................ r
(C) TOTAL LOCALLYSTOLEN AUTQSRFCOVERED ..................................................... �O
(D) NUl�16ER STOLEN OUT OF JURISDICTION, RECOVER'c0 LOCALLY . .... . . . . . .... ... ...: ... .. . ... ..... ... ... �
i.}' '
F
�
�
�
'
TABLE 5-- VALU� OF PROPERTY STOLEN AND RECOVERED
� VALUE OF PROPERTY VALUE OF PROPERTY VALUE OF PROPERTY
TOTAI VALUE OF
VALUE OF PROPERTY STOLEN LOCALLY STOLEN LOCALLY STOLEN OTHER
OFFENSE LOCALLYSTOLEN
STO�EN LOCALLY AND RECOVERED ANDRECOVERED BY pROPERTY RECOVERED 1URISDICTIONS
LOCALLY OTHER JURISDICTION RECOYERED LOCALLY
�ROBBERY
BURGLARY g � p.�O
LARCENY 1�., ]_ S•� . 2 . `� �jQ�QQ
AUTO THeFT OO OO O OO 2 O OQ OO OO OO OO
',' TOTAL �27,254.g9 �7,9o3.9z $2,450.00 �10,353.92 $3,360.00
�,
TABL� 6-- OFFEft�S�S C�.EA��Q �Y ARREST
year to date (include excepti�nai cle�rances) _ ..
�� '. NUMBER OF OFFENSES PERCENT OF OFFENSES
CLEARED BY ARREST CLEARED BY ARREST
;, • CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES TOTAL CLEARED BY ARREST OF TOTAL CLEARED BY ARREST OF
(PART I CLASSES) PERSONS UNDER 18 PERSONS UNDER 18
THIS LAST THIS LAST THIS LAST THIS LAST
� YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR
� 1. CRIMINAL HOMICIDE
a. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT ALINSLAUGHTER
� 6. MANSLAUGHTER BY NEGLIGENCE
2. FORCIBLE RAPE TOTAL I�. 2
a. RAPE BY FORCE 1
'• b. ASSAULT 70 RAPE - ATTEMPTS � 1
3. ROBBERY TOTAL 5 1-
� o. ARMED - ANY WEAPON 1 1
6. STRONG-ARM - NO WEAPON �
�4. ASSAULT TOTAL �;.i j5 E� E5'
a. ��N - L 1 -
b. KNIFE OR CUTTING INSTRU?dENT
c. OTHER DANGEROUS W"cAPO>I 1, 1
�' d. HANDS, FISTS, FEET, ETC. • AGGRAVATED
e. OTNER ASSAULTS - NO7 AGGRAVATED � �� j
� S. BURGLARY TOTAL 3� 7 3 <
a. FORCISLE ENTRY 5 '�
b. UtILA'%+.°UL ENTRY - NO FO�CE i
---------- -- --�-------1-- — �--
� _ �. ar r e_,�P � � o �ci �� e �'.�� ;; _____ � __1:_._�_�__ �_ _ j _ .__�. __ � �- ._ � � �.y
, 6. LARCE\1" - TH�F-T +(EXCEP7 AUTO TY,EFT) v r ' i 1�' —"—
a. S50 AND OVEP, IN YALU'c ��{ �}� ! 1-5
. b. UNDER SSO IN VALUE ?I!.? 3G1. �; /� 1�6 (
� 7. Al`;4 THEFT j�
� 5 2 �+
� � cn�an!� rora� � ►rl;.� � ?;.�'1 1b5� 27-7 � �
� ___..
;
T�4BLE 7-- PERSONS ARRESTED, CH,+4RGED �ND
DISPOS�D OF DURIt�G NIQNTH
ARRESTS
PERSONS COURT �ISPOSITIONS THIS MONTH
fORMALLY
(INCLUDE REIEASED NO FORMAL CHARGE) ADULTS GUILTY
UNIFORM CLASSIFICATION OF OFFENSES CHARGED ACQUITTED REFERREDTO
THIS OR 1UVENILE
' MONTH OF.. OF OTHERWISE COURT
TOTAL OFFENSE LESSER DISMISSED JURISDICTION
' ' JUVENtLES ADULTS TOTAL CHARGED OFFENSE
1. CRIMINAL HOMIC�DE: �
a. MURDER AND NONNEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER
b. MANSLAUGNTER BY NEGLIGENCE
2. F08CtBLE RAPE
3. ROBBERY
4, AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
5. BURGLARY - BREAKING OR EN7ERlNG
6. LARCENY • THEFT (EXCEPT AUTO THEFT) $ 2g 6 O 2� 2
7. AUTO THEFT
8. OTHER ASSAUL7S (RE7URN A• 4e) '� `�
TOTAL - PART I CLASSES � O g 2 2J_
THIS YEAR TO DATE Q �
LAST YEAR 70 DATE ,,Q `� Q
PERCENT CHANGE
9. ARSON
10, fORGERY AND COUNTERFEITING
11. FRAUD
12. EMSEZZLEMENT
13. STOLEN PROPER7Y; BUYING, RECEIVING,
POSSESSING
14. VANDALISM �
15. WEAPONS; CARRYING, POSSESSING, ETC.
16. PROSTITUTION AND CO!dMERCiALIZED VICE
17. SEX OFFENSES (EXCEP7 2 AND 16)
18. NARCOTIC DRUG LAWS
19. GAMBLING
20. OFFENSES AGAIN57 THE Fb".41LY AND CNILDREN
2L DRIVING UNDER THE �NFLUENCE rj j� rj 5
22. LIQUOR LAWS
23. DRUNKENNE55
24. DISORDERLY CONDUCT fj � L� � `�
25. VAGRANCY ti 2 2 2
26. ALL OTHER OFFENSES (EXGEPT TRAFFIC) 7
TOTAL - PART II CLASSES �-�- � �-f �# �� 1-�- 6
THIS YEAR TO DATE l�� J �ti�� �!�%� ��� �_p� b z6 02
LAST YEAR TO DATE ZO� .c:�� �r� � 1 C lla, !
P[RCENT CHANGE
TRAFFIC ARRESTS THIS A10N7H
PHYSiCAL CU570DY ARRESTS
WARRANTS SERVpD `_ l, 1, � �,
CI7ATIC:'t5 ISSU'r.D ^, ---- � - t -/ --K ',,^ i I �, ,'� _._
` ---- — - -'- - —`- i —
TOTAL TRAFFIC ARRESTS AND CITATI6NS > >Q >S �S �'-�' 2 5
i
• _ -
,'. 8-79a (Rev, 30-21-65y
_ �
CONSOLIDATED MONTHLY REPORT
I � TRAFFIC SUMMARY
Police Department
I City ot' Fridley i,Tove�ber
, Month of _
i
i , Thi
Accident Total
�� ' Fatai
Personal Injury
�
' Property Damage
� Pedestrian
I
�This
I
Traffic Total +
, � Hazazdous Violations �
Other Violations
' � Parking
DWI
, Accident Arrests and Citations
T TABLE 1. ACCIDENT SUMMARY
This Month Year to Date
Ye�' Last Year o�o Change This Yeaz Last Year
9 57 -15 4�3 5�3
�- - - 3 6
9 lg ,-5 z3o z��3
� 3$ -22 250 333
1 - 6 $
. 19 71
o/o Change
—1�
-50
-b
-25
-25
' _
` TABLE 3. CO;;��'ARATIYE Sil,'„r",tARY OF TRA'rFIC ACCIDE�tTS
,� This P�lontn Year to Date
This Year I,ast Year o�o Change This Year Last Year o�o Change
� Total Accidents �;� j`�J -°Z.S 1:�3 5�3 -l.a
' Fatal Accidents _ 1- ___ 3 6 � j�
Petsons Killed - 3 �
�r
'� l
I' Injury Accidents �9 � s+ _� 5 ,,,, ? �
��`7 2�'J -C
Persons Injured 27 _ 3� --� 6 J�7 1�16 -1�
i
� Pedestrians Killed 1 M ^ _
c
Pedestrians Injured — 5
I 7 -2°
' IIit and Run Accidents j 7_�. __ r�� .,., --
---=--- .-, � � 7
---- �� , • � --.
-- ------
--"'__L.__.,'__'._'__ _'__..... _
Cle�:rea b5� �lrrest _ � - 7 - --10 -
' Clearedi�o Arrest 3 5 �4� ,;,, �7 _�g
Total Cleared . 3 5 e,!` J 1;? 52 -�O
■ - --
� .
TABLE 4. COfAPARATIVE SUMMARY ACCIDENTS AND ENFORCEMENT (By Hour of Day and Day of Week)
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation Citation
Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and Acci- and
Time dent Anest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest dent Arrest
12 M ]. ]. 1
i:oo 1 1 1 3 1
2:00 1 1 1
3:00 1 1 1 1 1
4:00 ]. 1 1
s:oo 2
s:oo 1 1 1
7:00 2 2 1 I I 1
s:oo 1 1 1 1
9:00 � 1
io:oo 1 �
ii:oo 1 1 ? 2
12 N 1 1 2
1:00 1 1
2:00 Z 1
a:oo l 1 1 1 1 1
4:00 1 1 2 2 1 1
5:00 1 - 1 1 1 1 1
s: o0 1 1 1. ]. 1
7:0o i 1 1
8: o0 1 1. 2 2
9:00 1 1 7
io: o0 1 1_ 1 1 1
ii:oo
%iote: "Citation and Arrest" colunm should include a�i traffic citatious and arrests made during each hour period e�cept parking
citations.
-
�
'
�
, �
� ,
, �
, i
r
�
,
'
�
'
0
TABLE 5. COMPARATIYE SUMMARY OF ENFORCEMENT (By Violation)
This Month Year to Date
This Year Last Year This Year Last Yetir o o Change
Hazardous Violations Total ��' ?�- 735 5?6 +39
D� 7 2 1�9 52 —6
speeaing 17 6 350 245 -{-1�2
Reckless Driving 1 ( 5 -{-20
Careless Driving 5 2 56 6/a, _l3
liaffic Signal 6 �S 95 35 -F
Stop Sign � 2 2� 3]. —10
Other Regulatory Sign 2 �9 ].1{ -i-35
Improper Passing p 3 -}-
Improper Turning 1 ]_ ��r � �.
Right of Way - Vehicle g � +
Right of Way - pedestrian �
Following Too Closely � �.
No or Improper Signal � r� .�
Improper Start from Parked Position
Improper Backing '
Improper Lane Usage 15 1.0 -i-50
Failure to Dride - RigYit
Defective Equipment 1 S 47 �+3 _�
Other Hazardous Violation �� 1 3� � 6 -}-
-- ----- — ---- , - — ' / ^ . .� � / � �.�.
Other Violations Zbt�l � _
Parking Violation Total 5� 2� ���2 � l� _3�
�
.
�
�' ' RETURN A - II
; M�NTH�Y R�YURN 0� O�FENSES KNQWN TO THE 1'O�iCE
�
�, TO BE FORWAKUED TO 7'HE DIif�ART�tE\T OF PUF3I.1C �A:�li"I'Y, 12.56 UNIVFRSIYY A�'E., ST. YAUL 55104 [3Y' Tttc
SEVFNTH DAY AF7'E.R CLO; E OP '�IOtiTtI. See other side for inscrucc�ons.
r , I 2 3 4 5
OFFENSES RE- NUMBER OF ACT- NUM1iBER OF OFF'ENSES
CLASSIFICA'CION OF OPFENSES ORTED OR KNOW NFOUNLED. LE., UAL OFFENSE:S CLEARED i3Y ARREST 1'FIIS btOfYTH
(PART II CLASSES) TO POLICE (IN- FALSE OR BASE- (COLUhiN 2 �1INlrS A b
CLUDE "UNFOUND• ESS CORiPLAINT COLUMN 3) (IN- OTALOFFF.NSE BY ARRES'f OF
'�' Ep�� AKD CLUDEATTEI�iPTS CLEARED � PERSONS UNDER
T•I�T1'EMP'�;5,�' 1T0 Yr 1�0 YT'• :°l0• Yr. B�YSrLUDEC�th Sa;
�,
9. Arsop 1 �
i, � 10. Forgery & Counterfeiting 1 27 1 27 7
11. Frau� � 3 1 3 1
�� � 12. Embezzlement � �
�,
�� 13. Stolen property; Buying,
P� Receivin Possessin l 1
' 14. Vand�lism a7 301 27 3�1 1 25 1 1$
� 15• Weapons; Carrying,
' Possessing, etc.
16. Ptostitution and
i � Commerciatized vice
17. Sex Offense (except 2& 16) 3 30 3 30
5 1
18. Narcotic Dcug I.aws 1 12 1 12 10
� _ £�
19. Gambiing
' 20. Offense Against Family •
I'. and Children _ 1 __ 1
21. Dr�ving Under Influence � j+6 �' 1rb &' � 6
I' 22. Liquor Laws 1 3�? 1 1 3�' � 2�
37
23. Drur�kenness 22
' 22 22 2
24. Dis4rderly Conduct 33 3�9
:3 329 l0 193 3 18
, 25. Va�;rancy — 7 —
26. All Ot�er Offenses -- — 7 7
_(eXCApt craft�.�� t. 5 ._r?� �. __� 5 �2 2 37 2 9
' TOTRL, Part ZI Clusses �_-��- �� �
°� 9�0 l SC �9g 22 390 6 77
, I`1ove:mber 1G71
Month and Year pate
�, F'repared By � Ct�ieE or Sheritt
� r r'yC�l `: �r DO NOT USE TH1S SPF.CEI
1
CoUnty oc City IN[TIALS
' RECORDED
REVIEWFD
PUNCHED
� BCS. �o:m 118 � � � VF IFIED
3000� 7/yp ADJUSTED
�� � � .
,
�;
i ,
, t�OTOR VEH�CI�S
I�fiZrsag¢� C��
_ "� .�. _._ .Y
Not-ember 19 71
MPG Expan�e CPAS
;, , t�� 39 ]1�2 111,9 1Q.5 101�.05 .0��
t��.t�1 1� 1177 1�:6 . 9 z. o ?L o. 6�} .�i�
"� t��is�;� 49 1�24 30°.�+ 5.9 23t�.00 .IZ�
',I , U�xi �� V So �249 5�9.0 7.2 300.gb .071
�� 51 4733 637.7 7.�. ?39.$5 .072
� '
U�i��r� 52 6417 759.5 8.4 221,..53 .035
�n�-�� 53 417o r+99.9 $.3 ib� .g6 .039
, .� �
'
� _
' � � t�.��aant &
�'�i.i`�lt�,a 7'� ;f�
'
,
'
Thi� h'%n�
73
This i�ar
1127
� . SUPPLEi ;ENT TO
� TABLE 5-- VALUE 0� PROPERT`( STOLE�J AP��D RECOVERED YEAR TO DATE
, �
OFFENSE
, FQ,S�. ( _'___J.�_
S U I( l, L=' Y — --.—
L�RCENY
' AUTO Tti_,T _
TCiTtai.
' -----
� VALU� OF PROPERTY vm�UE 0� P24PERT1'` VALUE OF PROPgRTY
TOT�L �AIUE Of
�ALUE Of PROPERTY STGLEFfLOCI.LLY � S70LEN LOCA�LV STOLEN OTHER
STOIEtd LC}CALLY A?:D i:ECOVER�D � �ND RECOyERLD 6Y LOCALIY STOLEN �URISDICTIONS
LC.'ALIY I OTHE2JC215DiCTIG:� PROPERTY RECOVERED RECO�FRED LPCALIY
_. "_ . " ._'_ . _ � '
1] r'^r � � � 1 (!-� � _ �—�— � l, _�1n —
_ `_ �:_ .._� _- ,� ---- ---- ��jsn �
7 � , �- � :_' �.t_---- ' - ---------�- - --
i
l ?� , ;��� �,� 26� � �� �l, _ 2f� ryf' 21� ��i2Q
—�---- ?� �� ` � �� (l �i r i' �
_���g-,,l 0 ��`-i� 1'�� ,� <<i , -- _ LL, _- . , n .• „
��2�^, 533 . b9 � `7h7,1^b %l; :;'22, � � � . �o �,�9, 231. 21� ��'27 � �:3 7.00