The URL can be used to link to this page

03/06/1972 - 5544_ i � �' ' . ' � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - MARCH 6, 1972 - 7:30 P. M. , ' ' ' • � PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: _ ' ' INVOCATION: ' RQLL CAI,L: � ADOPfiION OF AGENDA: ' ' � j VISITORS: , (Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 MinutES) ' ' PUBLIC HEARINGS: � ' None � � OLD BUSINESS: . I� ' Consideration of Second eadin of n r'n 'r R g a 0 di ance Vacati �g Alley SAV ��7I-08 by Sam Templin. Generally Located in the 6700 Block on Ashton Avenue ' (COiIl�fENT: Second reading can be held and publication '�I ' authorized) ' � __ _ Item Number & Page Numbers ; , , 1 - lA �' COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA, MARCH 6, 1972 OLD $USINESS (CONTINUED) Consideration of a Request for Special Use Permit ,_SP ��7I-18, Ron's Gulf Service Station: Request for U-Haul Rentals on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, C.D. Hutchinson Addition per Code Section 45.I01, 3-E, Zoned C-Z COMMENT: Report of the meeting with U-Haul representatives is in the Agenda. Our recommendations are if the City Council is going to approve the Special Use Permit they - should do it with the stipulations as noted in the report) - NEW BUSINESS: Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of February 23, 1972 Receiving the Minutes of the Bui.lding Stanc3ards - Design Control rleeting of February 24, 1972 PAGE 2 Item Number & Page Numbers 2 - 2A .� 3-3D 4-4D ; ; , � GOUNCIL MEETING AGENDA, MARCH 6, 1972 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) Receiving the Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of February 29, I972 Receiving the Minutes of the Fridley Human Relations Minutes of February 24, 1972 0 Receivzng Bids and Awarding Contract for High Velocity Sewer Cleaner (Bids Opened March 3, 1972 at 1:3� P.M.) PAGE 3 Item Number & Page Numbers 5-SD C� 7 COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA, MARCH 6, 1972 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) ! Receiving Bids and Awarding Contract for Combination . ' Mobile Warming House and Shelter Building (Bids Opened , March 3, 1972 at 11:30 �.M.) --� COI�IENT: A, comparative cost analysis will be given to the City Council Monday evening) , Receiving Bids and Awarding Contract for Street Improvement Project ST. 1972-1 and ST. 1972-2. (Bids Opened 11:3Q A.M., March 6, 1972) �C�OMNNIENT: We will have recommendation ready for the meeting in the evening regarding the awarding of the contract) Consideration of Resolution Approving 5 Year Street Lighting Agreement with NSP ` COM�fiENT: A report outlining the changes is in the Agenda. If the City Council concurs they can approve the resolution) Consideration of Approval of "Operation Identi£ication" For the City of Fridley �� PAGE 4 Item Number & Page Numbers : 9 I0 - lOD_ 11 - 11D COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA, MARCH 6, 1972 NEW BiTSINESS (CONTINUED) Discussion Regarding Status of Improvements in the Area North of 79th Avenue. Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Project ��Z02 _(COMNIENT: We wiZl have difficulty acquiring easements from certain property owners. We want to get further direction from the City Council in this regard) Receiving HeaZth Sanitarian Quarterly Activity Report Dated February 23, 1972 Consideratian of Resolution Approving the Exchange of Properties, Easements, and Rights of Way for Water, Sewer , and Storm Sewer Project ��105-1 -- �COMNNIENT: This resolution authorizes releasing some City property in exchange for the needed easements and right-of- way for utilities in the area) PAGE 5 Item Number & Page Numbers 12 13 - 13C 14 - 14A Claims ZS � ' . i , ,' ' � i i ,I ' h � �,� I! � � � . � , - � : ' . I i ' C ' � ' ;r. , ' ' � ' ' , � � ' COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA, MARCH 6, 1972 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) Licenses Estimates Receiving Report - 1971 Earnings on Investments Receiving Report - Outstanding Bonds ADJOURN: PAGE 6 Item Number & Page Numbers 16 - 16G 17 18 - 18B I9 4! �i i` 1 ' , . � i-�,�-"� � J L �� C� � 1 ; � � �' � �� . __ ORDINANCE N0. _ � AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS A�1D ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE The Council of the City of.Fridley do ordain as follows: SECTION 1. For the vacation of an alley described as follows: That part of the existing alley in Block 10, _ Fridley Park Addition lying South of the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 1, Block 10 of said Fridley Park Addition, All lying in the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, T-30, R-24, City.of Fridley, County of Anoka, - Minnesota, Be and is hereby vacated except that the City of - Fridley retains easements for drainage and utility purposes over the portions of the alley herein described and vacated. SECTION 2. The said Vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. - i PASSEII BY THE CITY COLTNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF � c,��` '�1 , 1972. MAYOR - Frank G. Liebl ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell Yublic Hearing: February l4, 1972 First Reading: February 28� 1972 Second Reading:--��4 ,� � 2 Publish........ 0 � . '� . , � : 0 T. ,.�:AN�S • �H1R0; f AD'D/T/ .�r_ ..., ' o � � 1 ' I j _ «� j��a i . \� e� � r�. n �� ._�•._ : r ,'", � — r— :y' ' � '„�- wa� •• � .::L� �"':�: ,. �;, i+� � u}''} M . I � `�� . '� • •. \ y� � � - ,� :. K� d � �� .. �—�" 1-- � . 1 f/ 9 r ' i i � . : ,�� . I'I % � - �. r1'' , cn a , ' � ' �< <�� _ • f� ij �Y , ._il......... r � � � I j w �' . CL' � • ��) i , :.�� O ._ � ' -rl �,,,,� � �"' C�. Z j GM !N wy/ O�! ' �; ::�� '� , REV. AUD. SUB. N0: 23 ! I,�' : `; • i • ,• i j : : � Y d / j � 68 TN .'!AY , ' � , ` '� � ' .� � ,� lANS SECQNO "'AOO. .f �� 3 �� ' . � � N I _.!i �. _ _ ' i � � ,. .. •.. - ... J�±+ I � ��_ � � {. . i � � ' ._ �� F � P�l t.Z'r1! r r t� �f �--- �r-� - -, I r` � . l \� •.p ., i I i' ;�": -�-r`z-- \ �,:.. —� \/ �ys� `'.E �\, /' � � � R` � i�� r � � �. � i . � � . r � � r e �a n`. y�'� - � ; Z- � �, /•I �� 1't � • _ � .-_ �.�' � � :' - . ` �:- *'s �J/�, '= _ � a Y � - � � , i � �_ �j (.tm/ /� O+a ! ff,i{ ✓ Gi . /! � � � t� _ � �4 e p� � �y � � � �9L /f.� +hio- $ V� / � j� L�� l. @� �� i� � �L l/ f!� � ':y� •'i _�� f!; � . . � � /f Y a,r r. '��b b , n. �•� I � �{ 'i � ' l! . . �� f . h i � � �Y fy f ,- h � �' `i � . . F Z . , . �, ± t� .4K� . � 2 r ', . i .: � � N �� l 4L F* . �< g �� t� ,y ,� � eY / � .i 1s � . . ;/ �,{,y �i •,; �. .. y �. �{�_ � �Zy � C.i � [Iti ' _ ..._w I , ; . V... �� .i p I . . .i'`�_� . /.j 11 �� `[ . p5 � i �� " {y_ i. � � c . J'�' L�- :j . � QfU a+�c 6.j � ' .• � � -a � • r w9 • 3 �. � v �' , ,,�..�,.�-;=4_`�„ •7 , ub� " _`:. s�Th'-}.'�.4Y�� _ �1,tE � F � � . ,� � 1 ° r� � " �-%� S'- e h�•� a' �1 � . O 1 •� � �\ � 1� �. � rSe �, � � 't', —._1L-__ i I �� r� w \s i�i'" /s �� .-a�p e „ t :� ` z . � �# . � . � �.O �� fI rt' ��1 � Y T Q. v , � 3 ,/^• .�.I ' x ` a4 yI � i , � _.a'� „ • ..'� � 1 '`: M � 3\ � �' •� �i'�} � '/ ` . ��.}SJ'`. M V� d . X 1{:� �Y "I % ' � )� S�r � ` ` �„ � d � '1� � -` � " �_..K �!, ' :;?:..,, r,. 6J J/� � r � � � wy � y r Q F- � � �N � � B > � �y I ��`�'–F ` ` ��, "'�_ �u , • r `j � :y�Y ' �,s; �, � �,� ; � E ; o. ; F � . , a. �c. �/ . .71 5N< 1 1t yif�r. j }J�� b� ~ A,i�7 .: � i J � � �i � ��. 3 _�.� �[�Ptl ' �1l✓'C 1� L�. G ti/ .5�f �� j f ��I ,Y�.��. L W 1 e ✓)/�� ` f�l`e ! l ° � t : fl :� � "` `' '"� t-{ � w/j� a-� � .�• t 'f�� R ! s ' ; ' i.N:i � �'6 �- A� � Ls �t JjJj / �r.. �� Gj a .�� •" S �t h � ,r � � � �F { t �� 1 C � �i�/ � � + ; k ,� ` y , ' \� � \� y \ . `. ��!'j J�+�� A n k�y� OL_ ` f ;' . # � ' `�e 1� \\ /!'` �� :��:P A�) 41_ p !� � . _ `,� � i �iY - : � - , .., 6,., � y . � 1 ; i T � � „' " �E � � �.� , {� a1:''r .. - ; �"s � y a , y 'z � � � s'� t L� �, " r. � � S 7 � < � ' 4 Y' / , ^ � � � �•,, i f 3 � 4 �i r�� i . j � 'r r' � � � \ �' ��%' �. ♦ � ! �'1 n y . • . r ' �� .. .� ' + i µ .,�h �i i2 � J i��/"a Q. � � , ! J � � ° \ � s � ,., . . ' � �. . '� � � a � �� ''4 + . -{„ . 1 � � ' ii %D � y C 1 ' ' ilA .y t= _`` r..t %_�s� p f t � � \` t � �+ 9A 5 � .F. � P �i� � ..T`'� ' "� ,x � 4 ? � . '� � �s�y c o � 4 �� i� �� S1e � . . � �� Iti �'.� � � � i NE CORYER . SEC. /5 r � � M � 0�1��N i 1R ' _ C�� -� p�• _Y {♦ g ♦ d N /_ I✓ � ^ ,� ��;�� +%�y • ,.,�, � �� a"��t ' - r r'� ,� (^,,,'. - . �.. ir� °` , � � � -i�— ., � � � i ? . S � y� JA �� (l1 'as l 4i . a e � 1 ��: _ � t� 1- �, � __ ,,�-� � ; O ' � ' " _ ` � _ � � ' j � , � �r � ^t�'� � !-�`" R ' � � a —�/L . EC O �4 7� S � Z� M [ ONT_ _____ A. ; •,.YL �-J�i� � 1 _� ��._{ I ? . . 'i �� ii y / :f-/ . - { ,�' --�c. __ ., �.;J � I'I . �r, -" � r—' — a 'r � G `�' _ ��i' a V �� ..�4� y .� s . i, ' ! ::.� . t � � , ' - t . . .._ — �.i...�-_. � _ . .• ' .. �_�__ . _�._ r.�„_ __ ` .' � \ I _ V�f �,..:��X,ts.,,�-�-L— . —i�11SS!SSVPP} «-S7Rc�T— -- ." =;..-,.�r . .' _ __ �2 - M �' � � f !� E SEC /5 ER � i ' � . . 4i � c : . . • . I � . I ' � MEMO T0: MEA20 FRONI: City Manager City Council Nasim N1. Qureshi, City Engineer MEP�IO DATE : March 2, 19 7 2 MEMO NUMBER: CM #72-�05 RE: Stipulations Regarding the Special Use Permit for Ron�s Gu1f Station � SP #71-18 On Thursday, March 2, 1972, I had a meeting with the , xepresentatives of U-Haul as directed by the City Council and I suggested the following 7 stipulations: � , , 1. That the trailers be parked on the Northeast corner of the property (see attached map) and the parking area will be at least 20 feet from the North right of way line. The Northerly 30 ft. x 30 ft. space will be used for parking trailers and the Southexly 30 ft. x 30 ft. space used for U-Haul trucks. 2. The outlined area will also be striped to show the maximum � area allowed for U-Haul trailer and trucking parking. 3. Plant 6 additional ma.ple or ash trees. 4 along the East . property line and 2 along the North property line. (See attached map) 4. The car wash would not be in business and the area around it would be used �or parking. S. The abandoned island on the North part of the pxoperty will not be reused, 6. There will be no additional advertising signs advertising U-Haul. ' 7. The permit will be granted only for the duxation of 1 year from the date of issuance and it is renewable only after approval by the City Council. � , They indicated agreement to the above stipulations. Additionally, after reviewal of the station property, I would suggest that there be additional stipulations rec�uired of them to clean up the outside ' area, especially tn.e car wash area and the area South of it from all litter, replace all broken windows and provide proper garbage storage and disposal arrangements. ' i' NQ�njS < lt, �Q-t-�-=-t, �� . �� -,,,�� . NASI�4 M. QURESHI, P.E. City Engineer-Directox of Planning . _ _ ___ _ . -. . : � t � � ; . .. - ', � . �' . . . . � i '" � P. � � � . . . . /� . ,,�� ' • . .'� . � ��,J. . . . , �� t 5 `� // �� o � � � � � ��''� !/� - � . � , � � F°`" 'C ' :/' jj ��' ' _ ' � �r�� . . � � � . .�._�--�'� t ��1 . � . . ,i . - , i tt • ,l ; 'i 1 � ` ,�� _ . � � � _. : -f---r"`� _ ' - „G � �, �v� u 3 £) ��. - . ,_ �N�T � ,, r _ . ,1 �_ . �:, _ � . - : _ . � _ � -� , . _ _ _ ,, . . ., �_ , . �.. � . . . . . . . � . � - 1� . . . .. _ . . . � . r� � � �/`_ i ''` , ' a1 . . -^"� � ��t ;t ' ' � 'i. ' , + _ __ 1--� , . , � • ^� - l_ - ' _� ' ` `�i �� _ _ _ !� \`� . ' �, --- t , . a ' t`� . _ _ -1 �`�y-= -�- ' 1 ' ' . � " '� i i , � t _ -��.' `1 - � � - � � ,; � �r e � � 1 1` , ' V� - �.�, _. I r' . ' , ��I " 2�r o� ! /_�uc�s �. i ._ �__� , ; �..�.� .�,"_.'_�".'__ "�� # ;� _ -,,..... , i y 43 � i '__�_ .__.._.__? —•---- -- --s i�.___--.—, .,._. _ .� �'�! ;, ,�' / i/= .� �� .7: �/. �/�/ �z �` ' .� , � , . + ' a , � ' ' � ' ' :r�. � > � �� , � � PLANNING COrIl�ITSSION riEETING CITY OF FRIDLEY � �''� d �� ;� � �� FEBRiJARY 23, I972 � The meeting.was called to orcier at 8:00 P.M. by Chairman Erickson. ROLL CALL: 0 PAGE 1 Members Present: Minish, Zeglen, Erickson, Schmedeke, Fitzpatrick Menbers Absent: None Others Present: Darrel Clark, Engineering Assistant � Nasim rI. Qureshi, City Engineer-Di�ector of Planning , -- - Peter J. Herlofsky, Planning Assistant APPROVE PLAIVNING COrL�4ISSI0N r1INUTES : FEBRUAP,Y 9� 1972 MOTION by Schmedeke, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission . minutes of February 9, 1972 be approved. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried unanimousZy. 3� � RECEIVE BUILDING STAI�IDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL SUBCOtii�fITTEE MINUTES: FEBRUARY 10, 1972 MOTION by Zeglen, seconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planning Commission receive the Building 5tandards-Design Control Subcommittee minutes of Februarr� 10, 2972. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the moiion carried unaniniously. RECEIVE PLATS & SUBDIViSIONS-STREETS & UTILITI.ES SUBCO�P�fITTEE MINUTES: FEBRUARY 9, 1912 MOTIOIV by Schmedeke, seconded by Zeglen that the Planning Comrrrission receive the P.Iats & Subdivisions-Streets & Utilities Subcormnittee minutes of February 9, I972. Upon.a voice vote, a11 vot�ng aye, the motion carried unanimously. R�CEIVE BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES: FEBP,UARY 15, 1972 � MOTION b,y Schmedek�, seconded by Zeglen,.that the Planning Comr,zission receive the Board of Appeals minutes �f February I5, 1972: Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carr.zed unanimously. 1. VISITOR: D0�1ALD i�fITTELSTADT, 3?,D ��?ARD COUNCILt�LA��i : DISCUSSION OF PROCEDUkE _ FOR SUBCO2•^•.;TTEE 2•ff\7UiES RELAsT_�,rG TO COIJiVCIL A�D PL�titiT�1ING CO.r�IISSION: Councilnan �iittelstadt said he was here to address the Planning Commission . regarding the letter dated January 24, 1972 written b}� the City tlanager, as directed by Council, describing their relationship with the various subcommittees that reported to the Co;r;nission and their �enexal feeling abcut current operations. �Ie asked if tieey :•:ve!ld i,�isn this type of inv�2vene;�t to conti.nue as it is no,a or chanoe it as he �aould su��st i:��-. ; , . ' ' � .� - _ ' ' � ' - ' � - ' � � ' i ' � ' , ' ' ' ' , - , �� u _ . � Plannzn� Conmission ��eetin� February 23i 1972 Page 2 � He said that the Planning Couunission was a very important unit in the City � of Fridley. He has been a member of several Subcommittees and also rhe Planning � Commission and he fe�t the research work of these committees is necessary to , conduct Ci.ty Business. The City Council relies exclusively on the Planning Com- � mission for the physical aspects of the City, and tteere are political involve- ,; ments that concern Council decision. His proposal was that all of the Subcom- ;I mittees under the Plannin� Commission report their minutes to the Planni� Com- � mission. This is the purpose for having the chairman of the Subcommittees a �, member of the Plannina Co�,mission. When you receive the minutes of the Subcom- •� mittee, review and chsck and take action. If you do not agree with the recom- k, mendations as passed, you turn it over to the chairman o£ the subcommittee and he has the resgazsibility to return it back to the Subcommittee for recansidera- `} tion. - 1 Councilman rlitteistadt continued that the petitioner should be informed that sometimes these requests take quite a bit of time when public hearings are inv�Ived and theg should allo�r for that and not expect to be taken care of within a feca•da;�s. He said he proposes that the Commission thoroughly review the Subco�mittee min��vs, and that the P2annzng Cammission recommendation should be given top p�iflrity by the Council. If it takes a resolution to accom- plish this chang�, it can be done. He said he knecv the Council would go along with him �,*ith this presposal and they wi11 have a much better relationship between the City Counc�l and the Planning Commission. Chairman Ericksa� stated the Commission did discuss this. He did not think the Commission �,Tc�uld want to delay a decision on a request, and if they did agree to his propasal, they would have to change some of the Subcommittee and Planning Com�nissica� meeting schedules. Mr. Sch�.edeke sazd that the Chairman's suggestion made sense to him. It seens time is the eleme:�t that all petitioners shout about. His recommendation would be, if the systE;� did change, a representative from each of the Commis- sions and the CZty De��rtment representative meet with the Planning Commission. Then th2 responsi�ility for any error would directly fall on the individual. It is the time eZement to be considered as the members of the commissions and subco�Mittees are not paid. Chaircian E�ickso� said that his understanding of Councilman riittelstadt's pxoposal is that the ��abconimittee mi.nutes be acted on and appraved by the Plannino Co�u-�ission. in the past they haye merely been rec�ived with Council ac�ing on the request. . . � .' � � There follotiaecI a discussion by tlie members and the councilman of tha proce- dure used c,;hen �nose r::��;�4�ers served on the Subcomi:�ittees. rir. Qureshi explained how, in the case of tlz� Board of Appeals, the original set up was that the Soard made the recomsn�ndations and the Council male the finaZ decision. Then in 1g66, tne Council, in trying to shorten the procedure, gave the Board of Appeals the final say, with right of appeal oi the dznial to the City Council. Later on Council caas �ot satistied with this arrangement because of decisions by the Eoar_d and the Cc�uncil reverted bnck to the original set up. Chairnan �ric�.scn s��d tt�e Si::;CO:c::�l_Li.eP shouJd make sure the City staff has had tir�:e to �,o ov�,_1' the a^end, ite,:As. The Cor,t:.ission ��rould li.�e to lc:iot�r r _ , - , � �.► i P lanninh- Commission rleeting - Februar� 23s 1972 Pa�g�e 3 what Council wants. How much of the decisions does the Council want. He knows � what rlr. riittelstadt wants, but if it is the feeling of the Council that they . want the Planning Cocwission to take over the subcommittee, maybe the whole subcommittee should be �ade members of the Planning Commission. � rir. Fitzpatrick said the example they mentioned earlier was one request that more time could have been used and that is the tin shed on rfain Street. • It may occur once out of 100 tines, b�t he would not want that kind of thing to ' happen too of ten... Councilman Mittelstadt said that the Planning Commission should be the planning body of the City because his point was that the Council does not necessarily have the expertise for all the varied requests. With the recom- mendation from the Commissions, the Council could act with confidence. If we chose this metitod, the Council would be in a position where it would rely almost Lotally on the recommendations of the Planning Cor.unission. The fallacy that the general pubZic has of a City Councilman, that once he is elected, he is all seeing and all knoTaing. Councilmen should take great pains in the selection of the Couz.:rtitteemen so that they �vould be qualified to render good reco:�rnenda- tions to the Coun�il. There�ore Council w�ould be a policy making body. � _ Chairman Erickson said that if they were going to have a Building Standards Com.�nittee that really are going to be experienced, then those members should be appointed from the prafession itself, but the next thing is to get a qualified man �aho will say "yes" and serve. , � Member Minish arrived. Councilman Mittlestadt said he was not changing the ordinance. He was not saying the Planning Com�-nission would have the final decision, ho�aever,.their : recommendation would be considered'top priarity. � Mr. Qureshi said an the Design Control Committee work, the basic outline is __ ____-- - _ _ _-- - - -- ------ --- _ - - --_. _already set up.in the zaning ordinance and_the building code as to hoc� much the _ --- -- _--- -- ---- __ - --- -- -- T=- -- -.. _ _ __ _ -------- ------ . -- eity can require _the p�_�itioner to do._ a's_f.ar_ as�building-is concerried. . Chairman.Erickson asked if the p1.an is for the proposa2 to come to the Planning Cornnission be€ore the Council? Did Tir. riittelstadt think that woul.d prevent unfortunate decisions. } , � Gouncilman riittel.sta_dt said the requests wduld have tb go through the' sarae action as the Planni_ng Conuaission, to agree or to disagree. They would rel.y almost thorouohly on the Plannir_g Conunission. The only thing that would change .-the recom:nendation woul-d be a political involvnent or political aspect, fIe had the majority of the Council menbers agreeing with the proposal. � -. Chairman Erickson said the Planning Conu�iission caould do anything the Council - . wants. ' Cotmciiman riittelstad said he �,rould like to get the feeling of the Plannin� --: Commission and then he Fzould go to the Council. � .- ' . , _ ` � P lanning Coz*imission rieeting - February 23, 1972 Pa�e 4 -------, �� Chairman Eri�ckson said the Commission doesn't do a lot of planning for the City such as szdewalks. If it could be shown the suggested proposal does not -- delay the petitioner, he 4rould have no objections. The Subcorunittee and the Planning Commission found that the Council has, at times, ignored their recom- � mendations. � Mr. Minish said he would like to see the Planning Commission have authority ' to ma�:e.the final decision of granting permits for variances. If the Planning Commission gave a-negative decision, the next high court would be the Council. �i � Chairman Erickson asked rir. Qureshi if, to his knowledge, the public ever influenced the Council as ta the issuance of a building permit or issuance of variances. Mr. Qureshi said there have been discussions regarding buffers, _ landscaping, etc. Chairman Brickson said he felt that type of thing couZd be done at another level. Mr. Qureshi said there is a public hearing before the _ Board of Appeals and then goes to the Council. Chairnan Erickson said `that if the Plann�ng G�mmission were to act on variances, the Council has to give that autfiority or release that control if the Planning Commission is to be upgraded as a d�cision making body. --.Mr. �'itzpatri�k added that there is also the point that, besides some - necessary changes in Iegalifiies, there would also be some in the method of - practices. : Chairman Eric�:son asked that the Planning Commission be given more time to study the comments made this evening. . - Councilman Mit�elstadt thanked the members for taking up their time. • 2.. REFERENCE TO PLANNING CO�i�1ISSI0N r1:CNUTES OF FEBRUARY 9 1972 BY rIEMBER . ' SCHI�fEDEKE c Mr. Schmedeke called attention to Pages 8, 9 and IO of the February 9th minutes which re€erred to lots under C-1 and C-2 districts whose area did not meet the requirer�4�nts of the ordinance and therefore c��ere unbuildable lots. Upon further chec�:ing, he found it �•3as not the Planning Commission that definitely recom:mended the Iot area or lot width, The Comriission has alxeady run inro three situations where they cannot live with in our present zoning ordinance. The last request the Planning Comr��ission receiued, even with Changing the, zoni.ng f ro� C-1 to C-2, the land could not be utilizec� u�der that zoning. Adjoining -this property are three more parcels of the same size that are too small for the Fresenfi ordir��nce. To be certain that this situation does not continue, he proposed to na�:e an a�endnent to Ordinar�ce No. 459. He proposed that the Iot area be 20,Ot10 square feet, and the width 160 feet. Mr. Schmedeke said he thouoht it was a lo�ical request and prop�r. Even t•�ith these chanoes, variances will be requested. Chairman Erickson said that first of all, he was happy to hear Mr. Schmedeke say that the Planning Co�rmission didn't make the decision regardino the area requiremer.ts in Ordinance *;o. ��59. Those figur_es G;zre for a special area and did h�lp t'ne pxoalem in that area. _ ;. � ' . , s , � �-�� planning Co�mission rieeting - February 23, 1972 - Page 5 � . . .. �, The Chairman asked him how the change in the area requirements would affect - the progerty zoned C-1 and C-2. ' Mr. Schmedeke answered that there would still be variances. He found out -. that 25,000 square feet was quite expensive to buy because of assessments. He was asked.if anyone tried to develop the area around him under C-1. ' Mr. Schmedeke said that he thought it would help that situation. The house to the North of his property has 20,000 square feet. With the change in the ordinance, that area could develop commercial. .- Mr. Minish said that then there would be no. need for a Special Use Permit. 'The foll.o��ing changes were suogested: Square footage, front footage, Special .-..Use Permit (soae of the Uses in C-2 be permitted in C-1 under Special Use "' '.- ' Permit),"and add or subtract any Uses they wish. � .The City Engineer stated that Fridley has a very limited amount of property ' left in the C-1 areas. The Special Use Permit has the degree of control you may want to use and it,the permit3may be temporary. , , ' �� u The Chairman sug�ested this item be tabled until the next regular meeting and have the staff and members of the Commission come up �aith their suggestions at that tirae . . - Darrel Clark said that the footage requirements Eldon proposed they could probably agree caith, but he c�ondered if they should not wait until the Commission gets further into the study af the Comprehensive Plan. The Chaixman stated th� Planning Commission table the item of changing the - C-1 and C-2 Iand area requirements by Ordinance until the next regular meeting. • 4. APPROVE PLAI��iING COtiuiTSSION MINUTF:S: FEBRUARY I6. 1972 MOT.T.QN by Fitzpatrick, seconded by l9inish, that. the Planninc� Gommission minutes of February 16, 1972 be approved. Upon a voice vote, aZ1 voting aye, the motion carried unanimouslr�. The Secretary left the meeting at 9:30 P.M. �; . , . , 5. C0:1'I'INUED: STUDY: PROPOSEP COi1L'P,EH�'NSIVE ?�iUNTCIPAL DEVELOPi�fENT PLAIv': The Planning Com�ission continued their study of the Proposed Compreher.sive biunicipal Develo��ent Plan. The next study meeting is March 22, 1972. ADJOUP��-fEi`T : There being no further business, Chairman F.ric�cson adjourned the meeting at 12:00 P.ri. � Respectfully sub�:�tted r' i 4 i% ��i / i. • "•'.'`-'% '�L_ � ��.. -L��t��. Recording Secretary T _ I ' , � IC � ' ' ' - � I ' � , � � . . , .. . . . , .. BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTROL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24 ].972 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Zeglen at 8:00 P,M. MEMBERS PRESENT; Zeglen, Simo-�eau, Lindblad, Tonco, White MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Hank Muhich - Chief Building Inspector MOTION by Tonco to approve the minutes of the February 10, 1972 meeting as written. Seconded by Lindblad. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. CONSIDERATTON QF A REQUEST TO CONSTRU�T AN ADDITION AND REMODEL THE EXISTING RESTAURANT FACILITY LOCATED ON �HAT FART OF THE SOUTH 396 FEET OF THE NORTH 726 FEET OF THE SOUT'HEAST QUARTEI� OF TH� NOR'FHWEST QUAR'lER OF SECTION 12� T-30, R=24, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS• BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LTNE OF SAID SOUTH 396 FEET OF THE NORTH 726 FEET A DISTANGE OF 653.27 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE CQNTINUE WEST ON SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 288 FEET; THENCE SOUTH TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 396 FEET OF THE NdRTH 726 FEET WHICH POINT TS DISTANCED WEST 949.45 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF• THENCE EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAIb SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH 396 FEET OF THE NORTH 726 FEET A DIS- TANCE OF 288 FEET; THENCE NORTH IN A STRAIGHT LINE, A DISTANCE OF 396 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING• SUBJECT TO A ROAD EASEMENT OVER . THE NORTHERLY 50 FEET THEREOF• CONTAINING 2.62 ACRE MORE OR LESS• SiiB3ECT TO EASEMENT 20 FOOT WIDE TO MTNNEAPOLIS GAS COMPANY SEP- TEMBER 2, 1964; SUBJECT TO ROAD EASFMENT TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MARCH 25, 1966, THE SANIE BEING 1160 FIRESIDE DRIVE N E, FRIDLEYy MINNESOTA. RE UE�T BY FIRESIDE RICE BOWL 116Q �IRESIDE DRIVE N.E. FRIDLEY MINNESOTA 55432.) Mr. Glenn Wong was present to present the request to construct an addition to enlarge the kitchen and install new restrooms. Mr. Wong said they have a Iack of kitchen space and they need to improve their facilities. They will try to beautify the entire exterior of the building. He said he would appr.eciate any comn�en�s�the Building Stand- ards Subcommittee wanted to make. Mr. Wong said they were extending the kitchen. wa11 16 to 18 feet. T':.ey are evening the outside walls for a better appear.a.nce. The new kitchen will have a quarry tile floor and ceramic tile walls. Mr. Muh.ich said he h.ad to cove all corners of the ceramic tile. Mr. Tonco asked Mr. Won� if he was familiar with cement blocks with a porcelain finish that could be used in place of ceramic tile. As the addition will be constructed of cement blocks, with a stucco finish, he thought rSr. Wong might want to check on this material. Mr. Wong said the kitchen would have a11. stainZess steel equipment. The plan calls for a six £oot cioor to facilitate delivery and replacement of equipr.:ent. He said they were putting new joists under the kitchen floor to ensure the iloor was strong enough to hold all the equipment. Y h � � � � � �� , �1 , ' � C__1 ' ' Building Standards-Design Control Meeting of February 24, I972 Page 2 The Fridley Health Inspector and the members of the Board felt the entrances to the restrooms are poor, but there is nothing in the code that`says they have to be different. Mr. Wong said he would see if they could be changed but he might have to remove a booth. Mr. Tonco said he didn't want him to loose any seating capacity because of the change. Mr. White asked what arrangements they had for disposal of trash and gazbage. Mr. Wong said they have a dumpster for trash and the garbage was picked up daily by a private party. Mr. Tonco asked Mr. Muhich if there had been any complaints recently. Mr. Muhich said he didn't know of any at this time. Mr. Tonco said if the City received any complaints we would require a screened area for trash. Mr. Wong said they would be doing some painting on the inside and he was quite sure he «ould be installing a sprinkling system. As previously stated, the new addition will have a stucco exterior, and the existing building wi11 be resplashed to match. Mr. Tonco askeei about landscaping. Mr. Wong had some colored drawings with him with evergreens drawn on the p2an. Mr. �'onco said he had to present a landscaping plan showing the size and species of plantings. Mr: Muhich said they were going to landscape around the existing sign also. Mr. Tonco asked Mr. Wong if he had any kind o� barrier between the park- ing lot and the green area of his home. Mr. Wong said he had some small posts. Mr. 5iu��neau suggested he install some type of railing between the posts.. Mr. Wong asked if he shauld put up a fence. Mr. Tonco said the fence wauld have ta be 5 feet from the property line so the cars wouldn't damage the fence. Mr, Tonco said it usually is a requirement to have poured concrete curbing around blacktop areas but as the black- top was already there, they would a11.ow Mr, Wong to use precast curbing along with the posts, if he wanted co use this as a barrier to protect the property around h.is home. Mr. MuhicY: said if Mr. Wong �hould decide, at a fceture time, ta expand the parking area he would be required to install conerete curbing around tha blacktop area. Mr. Tonco said we require a l0 foot typical radius on the driveway entrances also. Mr. Lindblad asked ab�out ' light in the back of the lights. r1r, Muhich said was closed. ' � ' � security light?r_g, building, two night it was quite brigl�t Mr. Wong said they have a watch lights and canopy even when the restaurant Mr. Muhich said that three sets of plans, including structural, mechanical, and electrical drawings are needed before processing can start on a building permit. MOTION by Tonco to reco�unend approval to the City Council the request to construct and addition and reu�odel the existing restaurant facilities with the follo�aing stipulati_ons: 1. Coving tile on floor 2. Some type af curbing 115Q Firesi.de Drive. 3. Have Landscaping plan and wal.l junctures of the ceramic tile. e� guard to protect green area at ready to submit to the Council. �A , BuildinQ Stand.;rds-Desi�n Control MeetinQ of Februarv 24, 1972 Pa�e 3 �� ' � ' Ll Seconded by White. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. � � 2. CONSIDERATION OF A RE UQ EST TO CONSTRUCT AN OFFICE, SHOP AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING LOCATED ON LOT 19 �EXCEPT THE EAST 190 FEET THEREOF;) AND THE WEST 147.74 FEET OF LOT 18, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION ��129, THE SAME BEING �� 7325 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E „ FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432. (REQUEST BY AETNA �,� LITHOGRAPH GO�II.'ANY, 782 29TH AVENUE S.E. , MINNE.�POLIS, MINNESOTA 55414Z ��''T�' y� � u Everett Swanson was resent to resent the re uest to construct a � r�� P P 4 20,000 square foot office, shop and warehouse building to be used for a commercial printing plant. 1,200 square feet wi1l contain the office, 6,000 square feet wili be used for storage of paper, and 12,800 square feet for the shop. The building will be 200 feet wide on 73rd Avenue and 100 feet in length, with 50 foot setbacks . There are some existing structures on the property. There is a capped ' basement Mr. Swanson would like to use for storage of files and office equipment. This basement is tiled and paneled and so is usable. There is also a smaLl cement block building and an old s[ructure that probably ' should be to�-� down. Mr. Swanson said he didn't know where these struc- tures were located in relation to where he wants to place the new build- ing so what he can use and what has to be town do�,m has not been deter- ' mined. Mr. Simoneau said if he planned to use the capped basement a better entrance would have to be provided. Mr. Swanson said he employs about 45 people and didn't want the present parking area as Iarge now as it is showrt on the plan. Mr. Muhich checked the Code for parking requirements and it was, determined that Mr. Swanson could reduce the parking area, until future needs required mcre parking. Upon discussian, the Board decided Mr. Swanso.Z could use precast curbing at the termination of the present parking area until such tirle as he needs the entire parking area and then poured cancrete curbzng would be required. The balance of the blacktop area and driveway will have to have poured cerncrete curbing no*.a. The East side of fihe dr?veway and the East and North sides of the parking area have to be fenced in accord- ance with the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Tonco raised the question if a bitumi.nous surface would be heavy enough for the �rucks delivering paper supplies. Mr. Lindblad asked what arrangement there would be for trash disposal. Mr. Swanson said a11 refuse is stored inside the building. SO per cent of the paper is sold for recycling and 50 percent is given away. Mr. Swanson said chemicals, ink, and other similar supplies would be kept in a locked storage room. Mr: Zeglen asked how big the printing presses were and Mr. �wanson said the largest was SO feet Iang. Mr. Tonco said the plans called for brick facing a� the i�iest and Sourh exterior bloek had to be painted. � an all coucre�e block building with sides. He told Mr. Swanson that all � Building Standards-Design Control Meeting of February 24, 1972 Page 4 4C ' l_.J ' ' , ' ' , ' � Mr. Muhich told Mr. S�oanson that the contractor he hired would have to be licensed in Fridley. If he wan't already licensed this would take approximately two weeks. We also need three sets of plans which inclu�e engineer approved structural, mechanical, and electrical drawings and 3 plot plans with landscaping. Mr. Swanson said he thought he would put in a sprinkling system, MOTTON by White to recommend to the City Council concept approval only of the request to construct an office, shop and warehouse. Seconded by Simoneau. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 3. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR PRELIrIINAR.Y APPROVAL QF PHASE I(FIVE (5) FOUR UNiT QUADROMINIUMS) 0�' THEIR COIQDOMINIUM PORTION OF THE TOTAL MUL- TIPLE UNIT COMPLEX LOCATED ON PART OF OUTLOT H INNSBRUCK NORTH ADDITION �� THE SAME BEING IN THE 1600 BLOCK OF INNSBRUCK NORTH ADDITION FRIDLEY ,I� MINNESOTA 55432. (REQUEST BY VIEWCON, INC., 5901 BROOKLYN BLVD., ,`� MINNEAPOLIS, MINiQESOTA 5547.8 . ) 1r' _ _ __ _ _ . Mr. Dave Philli�s and Mr. Kenneth Nordaune were present to present the request. Of the 850 unit density allowed in this area, approximately 320 units wi11 be quadrominiums. Mr. Phillips said the difference be- tween the regular townhouses and the quadrominiums was that in a town- house you own the land the townhouse is built on and in a quadrominium you just own the air space. This is because the tuck-under garages , for the four units are only under two units. Two units will have a full basement and the units that have the garages will have half basements. Two units will have patio areas on the ground, and two units will have patio decks over the garages. Mr. Muhich sai_d he would prefer precast decking as a fire separation between the garage and the living quarters above, but Mr. Phillips has a letter from the State Building Inspection Department where, in the judgement oi Chester J. Zimniewicz, P.E., all that is required between the two occupancies is a one-hour occupance separation. Mr. Simoneau asked if the real estate tax basis would be different � from a regular toGmhouse. The Board asked the secretary to get tttzs ___ information.(Mr. Mervin Herrmann, Assesscr, said they would be taxed by value, the same as the toc,mhouses.) Mr. Nordaune said they already nad units like this in Inver Grove and Brooklyn Par?c. He said each unit of. four would have four heating systems with a I2" C`ass $ coui�on flue. _ _ Mr. Tonco asked about the exterior finish. Mr. Nordaune said it would be texture 111 siding over 5/8" plywood. He sa:d the buildings might vary in color but they would all be compatible. The roof would be composition shingle, the same �son their other units. There will be cedar trim. Mr, Tonco asked about soundproofing. :ir. Nordaune said all party walls would have two separate walls with two separate studs and two separate ,plates._ Each wall will have double Type X sheetrock. This givesa FBC 'rating of 52. . , � Building Standards-Design Contrpl Meeting of February 24, 1972 Page 5 Mr. Tonco asked about the slope of the patio decks and was told they�d be sloped for drainage. , Mr. Lindblad asked about trash disposal. Mr. Phillips sait� the bylaws of the association stated that all containers had to be stored in the garage except the day of pick-up. MOTION by Tonco to recommend to the City Council approval of the pre- liminary plans for Phase I(five (S) four unit Quadrominiums) of the condominium portion of the total multiple unit complex. Seconded by Lindblad. Upon.a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. Chairman Zeglen adjourned the meeting at 10;45 P.M. Respectfully submitted, .<..� ZY'�'✓.�/ Dorothy enson, Secretary � 0 , � � . � i �J ,� ' . � �� ' THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF FEBRUARY 29, Z972 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Minish at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Minish, Harju, Crowder MF.I�ERS ABSENT: Wahlberg, Sondheimer OTHERS PRESENT: CTarence Belisle - Building Inspector , MOTION by Harju to approve the minutes of the February 15, 1972 meeting as written. Seconded by Crowder.� Upon a voic�e vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 1. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION �+5.053. 4B. 5A. TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM SIDE YARD WIDTH ON A STREET STDE OF A CORNER LOT FROM 17.5 FEET TO 10 FEET TO ALLOW BLOCK 4, PEARSON'S CRAIGWAY ESTATES 2ND ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 7898 ALDEN WAY N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA. (REQUEST BY CF3ARLES E. JOHANSON INC., 580- 69TH �- AVENUE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA.) _ ��, Chairman Migish said Mr. Johanson had called him to explain he would not be '� able to attend this meeting but he would still like the Board to consider the variance. A survey of the lot, with the proposed location of the house drawn on it, was ' shown to the Board. The lot is a corner lot and has an odd shape having a frontage of 57.94 feet plus a radius and a back footage of 160 feet. The angle is on the south lot line. The proposed house is 48 feet long plus a ' 24 foot attachad garage. The house will face Alden Way with the driveway , possibly ex iting onto 79th Way. Z'he driveway would be vexy close to the intersection having tv exit on either 79th Way or A].den Way. ' �� 0 � ' ' Mr. Belisle said the buyer that Mr. Johanson has for the Iot, wants the house positioned as proposed. To position the house this way would save some trees, as this is a wooded lot, and would also preserve the back yard. The grade of the 1ot raises toward the back of the lot. To face the house toward 79th Way, which could be done w ithout variances, would involve removing part of this bank. To position the house to meet the side yard requirement, while facing toward Alden Way, would also require removing part af the bank. lizere is a vacant Iot adjacent to the south, but there would be no problems in building on this lot whether the variance on Lat 1 was granted or no�. MOTION by Harju to close the Public Hearing. Sec�nded by Sondheimer. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Harju said the buyer has a specific floor plan that he wants to build on this lot and it does not constitute a haxdship just because this floor plan will not fit on the lot. They could put a different style of house with the same amount of �l.00r area on the lot without needing variances. Chairn�an Minish asked if there would be any traffic problems with visibility or backing out onto 79th Way? � � 0 ' � L� , r �'i The Minutes of the B�ard of Ap�eals Meeti� of February 29, 1972 Page 2 J Mr. Belisle said he didn't think there would be any problems. Mr. Crowder stated he would be in favor of tabling this item as there were only 3 members of the Board present. He did not have any objections to the variance but he was concerned with the grade of the driveway. � MOTION by Harju to table this request until the March 14, 1972 meeting to �, enable the Board to discuss this variance with Mr..Johanson as it appears there are many solutions to the problem that can be proposed to make the house conform to the Code. r ' � � Il ' � ' Seconded by Crowder. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the,motion carried unani.mously. 2. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45 073, lA, TO REDUCE THE LOT AR�A RE�UIRED FOR 295 LIVING UNITS IN FIVE SEPARATE BUILDINGS, FROM 737,500 SQUARE FEET `2 500 SQUARE FEET x 295) TO 700,564 SQUARE FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 5TH BUILDING OF THE'APARTI��NT COMPLEY, TO BE LOCATED ON LOTS 1,2,3,4,5, AND 6, SLOCK 2, PEARSON'S 1ST ADDITION AND ON PA.RT OF U.S. LOT �r`2, THE SAME BEING 7805 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E.. FR�DLEY, NIINNFSOTA. (REQUEST BY FTVE SANDS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 7845 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E., FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA.) Mr. Dick Fudali, co-owner of the apart�nent complex, was present the request. Pictures of the complex and a plot plan were shown the members of the Board with the project. to present �1 to familiarize .4 a� !��,� Mr. Fudali said (in summary) that the original owners of the land initially ``1�i conceived this pro3ect as a 294 or 295 unit complex. Prior to his purchase of the property, he went over all of the minutes of the various committees and Council meetings concerning this complex to make sure the property was adequate, as represented to him, to accommodate 294 or�295 units. .He then read portions of these minutes to the Board, and all the minutes, even as late as November of i970, were covering a 294 or 295 unit complex. The mistake in computing the land area was made by Dolan Engineering who made the site plan for the original owners. When drawing up the site pl.an they apgarently took the acreage from the half section map, which included half of the East River Road. right of way along the west side of the property. The site plan dated July 26, 1970 that was submitted by the original owners to the various committees and Council showed a land use schedule which s�ated "actual land area 17 acres", This acreage was incorrect in that it did include the right of way��mEasurement. �� ;�� ' � �, �Th.e error in acxeage �,ras discovered when Five Sands Development was filing the plat. � ' Mr. Fudali explained to the Board that alI of their contracts and orders ' are all signed and ordered for a 295 unit compl�. To cancel the contracts and change the orders, etc., at this time, to accommodate less than 245 units would involve thousands of dollars. ' � , The green area in this development is a com�non area for the whole complex. Therefore no green area caould be talcen a�aay from this specific building by granting the variance. � � The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of February 29, 1972 Page 3 � Mr. Fudal.i said they feei they have done more for the property than was � originally promised to the City. The complex has been very well accepted ; I' b the eo Ie and almost all of the units that are finished are rented. Y P P ; � �' Mr. Winston Jacobson, 121- 79th Way N.E., stated he was not opposed to the i complex but he did have a complaint on the berm that is used to screen the � garages fxom view. He still has to look at the back of the garage and the ; • front of cars because the benn was not completed as it was agreed to be. ;� He said he understood that the entire berm was to be 5 feet high and it is � not. In some places it drops down to 1- 1'� feet above the ground. The M' initial berm comes up to the eave of the garage and if the rest could be � that high it would be okay. � � � ' , �r i Mr. Fudali ans�aered that he felt that this was not the right time to bring up the berm, as it has nothino to do with the variance. He said he had. discussed this with the City Engineer and he had suggested making the berm flowing. He did not remember, at this time, whether the City had stipulated it being 5 feet high. Mr. Belisle stated the apartments are occupied under a temporary certificate of occupancy and a final certificate of.occupancy wi11 not be issued until all exterior development is completed according to the approved plot plan. If it was stipulated that the berm be 5 feet high, it wi11 have to be corrected before this final certificate of occupancy is issued. Mr. Fudali added they also have landscaping bonds on each building that are still in effect. Mrs. Jacobson stated the berm looks like it is as high as they are going to make it as it has trees planted on top of it but those trees are not going to hide the garages from view. • Mr. Fudaii said he was working with the City in getting fill and this could be used if need be for the berm. There was a discussion on other requirements, as parking, and it was brought out that a1I of these requirements have been complied with. MOTION by Crowder to close the public hearing. Seconded by Harju. Unon a voice vote, there bei'ng no nays; the motion carried ` unanicaous Zy. Mx. Harju stated there was indeed a hardship in the error that was made even though it was not the City's error. The developer has pursued this project witn good intentions and this is a reasonable request. HP did sympathize with the people on the north who had the view of the garages and parking area but if there was a mzstake in building the berm, he was sure the Building Inspection Department would w�ork toward rectifying it. Mr. Cr_owuer stated he agreed �aith Mr. Harju. sB� � � � � �• .. ' , . � ' j � ,� � � The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting.of February 29, 1972 Pa�e 4 Chairman Minish informed Mr. & Mrs. Jacobson that they could contact the City Engineer if they wanted moxe intormation on this. MOTION by Harju to recommend to the Counci,l approval of the request since there is a hardship due to the error that was made by the engineering company that drew up the site plan. The xequirements for the larger building ` have already been met. It is just the tota2 area that not been met. Seconded by Crowder. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. 3. A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF SECTION 45.053, 4A, TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK REQU��tEMENT FROM 35 FEET TO 15 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION 7, BLOCK I,,�;,NNSBRUCK S�H ADDITTON, THE SAME BEING 5171,5175.5179.5183,5201, 5257 AND 5275 ST IMIER DRIVE, FRIDIEY, MTNNESOTA. (RE(�UEST BY RODNEY BIL N�, INC�RPORATED, 151 SILVER LAKE ROAD,, NEW BRI�GHTON, MINNESOTA ) . Cy"' Mr. John Bogucki was present to present the request. ��'� � Chairman Minish explained this item had been tabled from the meeting of February 15, 1972 to allow the appliGant time to bring in sketches of the type of houses that could be built on these Iots. MOTI(N by Crowder to reopen the public hearing. Seconded by Harju. Upon a voice vote, there being no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Bogucki presented 5 skatches of what possibly could be built on these lots. The final decision would have to be made by the buyer however, as to what he would want. There were seven property owners in the audience tha.t came forward to look at the sketches. It was asked if the drivecaays are still going to be put together? Mr. Bogucki answered that the garages could be tooethex but they wouldn't have to be. � , - It was asked what would be done with the ponding area? Mr. Bogucki answer.ed that it would be up to the peopl� who bought the land. . They could possibly keep the water at a higher level if they wanted to. The main concerns of the property owners were; the back of the house being just cement block, landscaping in the front yards, the blanket variance, 2 drivew�ys together, and 1 property owner was against the garages being ahead of the house. Mr. Bogucki explai_ned that he does not need a variance to huild the house. This will be set back the required 35 feet. The variance is only on setting the garage ahead of the house. 1'he house will be built the way the buyer �� ;1 � •�. The Minutes of the Board of Appeals Meeting of February 29,1972 Page 5 would want it. The houses will be higher in cost than the surrounding homes because there will be more material necessary to build them. They would not devalue the surrounding homes, in fact, they could possibly raise the value. i. Mr. Belisle stated the Engineering Department had found the existing � elevations for each of these lots. The difference in elevations fxom the '! existing curbing to 70 feet back onto the lots is between 13 and ].6 feet. ;� . ` The elevation was also found on the walk out basement on Lot 9, the lst lot around the corner to the north, and the City will not alloca the proposed � houses to be lower than this. f � . ' " ' MOTION by Harju to close the public hearing. Seconded by Crowder. Upon a voice vote, there bein g no nays, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Harju stated his feelings have not changed since the Iast meetingo No new information has been brought �n. We dan't have a particular house for a specific lot to consider as there are na buyers. I think goi:�g on an individual lot basis instead of a blanket variance would woxk out better. I have no specific objection to moving the garages ahead of the house. Mr. Crowder stated he is opposed to a blanket variance. As far as adjusting the garage setback, thexe is a probl.em in the tremendous amount of fill needed if the garage was to be set back 35 feet. I have no qualms about deviating the setback. It would be easier for the build�r if he ceuld get a blanket variance and I think we ahould give him some assurance that he has a better than a 50 per cent chance of getting a variance if he was to find a buyer and come up with a specific plan for a lot. Mr. Bogucki asked if there would have to be a hearix►g on each varianc� for each lot when he found buyers for them. Chairnan Minish ans��ered yes. He added t.hat if the Board rec�mmended denial - of the xequest tonight, and the Council concurred, it �aould be 6 r,►onths before this request could be brought up again and this mi�ht hindex the dsvelope•r if he happened to find a buyer before then. v MOTION by Cr��adex to t�ble this request V�ith the understancli.ng �h�.t it can be braught back on a lot to lot basis. Seconded by Haxju. Upc�n a voice vote, there being no nays, the �?otion carri.ed unanimously. ADJOUIt��'�.NT ; The meeting was adjourned by Chairman riinish at 9:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted ��; __ (-� � M�RY HIN�;Z �� . Secx�etary �5 0 r_ _ __ _ _ - -r _ : --. �. I_ __ • `. 4 � � , I �' THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 1972 ` � � � ' ROLL CALL: � , i �• MEMBERS PRESENT: Lillian Wegler, Katherine Moss, Carolyn Rouse, Diane Bonine, ! Eileen Stenberg, Jim Langenfeld, Walt Starwalt !, I � MEMBERS ABSEI3T: Bonnie 0'Dell, Ruth Kelshaw, Mrs. Domingo Ramos, Paul Shaw, Theron Horn, John R. Iders, Rev. James McChesney, Rev. Doug�as Henderson � NEW BUSINESS: I. Election of Officers - Nominated and voted in as follows: 1 Walt Starwalt - Chairman Jim Langenfeld - Secretary , 2. A request was made that a current listing of inembers be presented , to each current member. 3. Carolyn Rouse and Katherine Moss volunteered their names for possible � appointment to District ��14 Intercultural Committee. ' 4. Agreed that Mayor Liebl be aPproached to address the Committee at his pleasure. r� 5. Agreed that Carolyn Rouse review the dress approval code, if any, and report findings at next meeting. .� The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Walt Starwalt � , Respectfully submitted, , I Walt Starwalt, Chairman � � � , , ITEM #7 The Bids will be ready for Council consideration on Monday night. � '7 ITEM #S A comparative cost analysis will be given to the City Council Monday night. h � b 0 � ITEM #9 The City Engineer will have a recommendation ready for the meeting Monday night regarding the awarding of the contract. � . � __._ _ 9 ' ' MEMO T0: City Manager and City Council ' ' MEMO FROM: Nasim M. Qureshi, City Enginee� - Director of Planning MEMO DATE: March 2, 1972 MEMO NUMBER: C.M. �1972-06 RE: Report Regarding The New 1972 Street Lighting Contract With Northern States Power Company The following are the changes in the new proposed contract from our existing contract signed in 1967 with Northern States Power Company; 1 . I. II. , III. IV . ' ' � p ' ' ' ' , , � i ' VI. VII. 1967 & I972 Street Light Contracts (compared) No service�for ornamental street lights in 1967 contract. 14 in 1972 contract (400 W.) Service for night lights in parks not included in contract because they are billed separately. Exhibit "A" in i972 contract does not include Phase I for 1971 street lights. Rates (compared) 1967 No. I972 175 W. Merc. Vapor $45.00 (S23) $47.40 Schedule "A" 250 W. Merc. Vapor $55<20 (216) $58.80 Schedule "A" 400 W. Merc. Vapor $72.00 (7) $76.80 Schedule "A" 400 W. (ornamental) Merc. Vapor Not Tnc. 14 $42.00 Schedule "B" * 1F48EHo Fluorescent $45.00 (Nane) $48.00 - - - * All f].uorescent light units have been replaced by Merc. Vapor light units. Underground service not included in 1972 contract. This would be undex rate schedule "C" and to datE Fridley does not have underground service. Rate Schedule B includes replacing ballasts of light units in 1972 contract which was not included in 1967 contract. 1972 contract includes automatic renewal in 5 year periods unless terminated by written notice by either party to the other within 30 days prior to expiration of any 5 year pexiod. This wa.11 alleviate preparing resolutions every 5 years. NMQ/mh NC��-t �u �','t (..�'c--t�S-�_1' NASIM ri. QURESHI, P.E. City Engineer-Director of Planning �� , _ . � �.0 � � � -- - _ r; . . . . _ � � . ,� . - � �� . � : .. _ _ �� . . xESOLVTZOV � � � � G%, � � . � � � � � � � � ' .. � { ' RESOLVED That the City Council of the City of Fridley, , . - . . Anoka County; Minnesota, hereby accepts�the proposal of NOR'I'HERN i � . . STA'�ES P06�1ER CO`QPANY, a Minnesota �corporation� to furnish street ' ligh�ing service wi�h all ligh�s located or to be located in said '�: �� City, and hereby approves all rates, terms, conditions, and speci- ,. fications in the Street Lighting Contract made a part of -�he proroosal '�, qf said Company and �he proper officers of the City are hereby � � ' - \`, authorized and direc�ed to execute the aforesaid Contract for and ia ihe name of the City, and to affix the corporate seal thereto. ' � � ' . . ' . • ` , `i , Adopted by �he Council f� "/ � , 19'j2. ' ' . : � - : . I -� �-� �� I DO HEREBY CERTIFY �hat I a.� the City Clerk of the City of Friclley� Anoka County, Minneso�a, and that I am cus�odian of its records; that the aoove is a tri,ie and cor-r.ect copy of � �, Resolution adop�ed by the City Council of said City on � 1972• y . _. _ , City Clerk ' : - � � , . i 1 , � . . �. FoRM �sz-ros9 v-„, STREET LIGNTING CONTRAC7 1� � � THIS CONTRACT, dated AA�Z 1 , 19 72 , between NORTHERN STATES POWER COhfPANY, ' a Minnesota Corporation, hereinaftet called "Company," and the CT`I`Y of FRIDLEY � a municipal corporacion of �� County, in che State of MIlVNESOTA heteinafter called "Customer," WITNESSETH: That che parcies hereto, each in consideration of the agreements of the other, agree as follows: 1. KIND OF SERVICE: Company agrees to supply Customer wich illumination or service as designated in the Rate Schedule(s) A-B-C attached hereto and made a pact of this contract from facilities located as shown ou Exhibit(s) A-B attached. 2. CHANGES AND ADDITIONS: When requesred by Customec and pursuant to the additional conditions on the reverse heteof, Company mill proaide additional street lights. When there is a major change in the number, size, or rype of light source, or at least once each calendar year when there h�ve been changes ia service, Company will prepare re- vised or new exhibits. Such revised or new exhibics shall be considered incorporated herein when the parties have caused said exhibits to be executed. In the event additional si2es or types of street lights are available from Company and desired by Customer, the applicable Rate Schedule shall be expanded to include these additional lights and their respective rates. 3• TERh1S: This contract shall be in force for a period of 5 years commencing on _ AUz'il 1 � 19 'r2 � and shall continue in force thereafter for nerinc�c �f 5 �PaT� ,,.,lP�� rPr..,�.,afoa ti<. .,,.:�ro., .,,,..,.e ,.s ,.�..,.�ii,..:�_ _._._. no event sha11 this Contract be extended ----------- °--� --b--v .,_..� ......... 4. PAYMENT OF BILLS: All bills are payable at Company's office on or before the thirrieth day succeeding the date bill is rendered. 5. �DITIONAI C;OND[='�LQN� 'The Customer a rees to acce t and av for such servi e in ac tda, ' e at rules, and re�ulations of the Com an in effect from time to time for thi.s cl ss s ' e. at presently in effect for services hereunder are sfi�own i�n the atcached rate schedules. Service hereunder shall be supplied for Customer's use subje�t to agreements containedherein and in the "Additionat Conditions" shown on the reverse hereof and made a part of this Contract. 6. TERI�INATION OF PRIOR CONTRACTS_ It is agreed that, on the effective date hereof, this Contract terminates all prior contracts covering street lighting service furnished hereunder. IN �VITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this contract to be duly executed. In presence of: Wimesses As To Company NORTHERN STqTES POt�'ER COMPANY By And CTTY By Attest DNISION MANAGER of FRIDLEY iT�� • � Witnesses As To Customer CITY MANAGER : _ . ;, �n C � FO � . . � � . . _ . . . . . . . � RM +az•�aa9 n_�� • Rate Schedule A To Street Lighting Contract Dated APril l, 1972 OVERHEAD STREET LIGNTING � ' ' (Company Oa•ned) . AVAILABILITY:.AvaiIable for year-round illumination of public streets, parkways, and highways by elec- uic lacnps in lu�inaires supported on wood poles, where che facilicies for this service are furnished by ' Company. • , ' RA?E: . ... . , . • Number of Monthly . � Lamps per Rate per Designation of Lamps Luminaire Luminaire , �� 175 Watt Mercury Vapor . 1 ��3• 95 �.... c� J�, 250 Watt Mercu_ry Vapor 1 $1+. j0 ' - . . .....�...� C�� 400 Watt Mercury Vapor 1 �6.40 ..........�. ' `�' 1F48EH0 Fluorescent � 1 �4.00 .�....�...... , '� _ 1 � _. ' �l�� C�� - �'+�� , � SERVICE INCLUDED IN RATE: Company shall own, operate, and maintain the Overhead Street Lighting system usin� Company's stand�rd street li hti�q�ui ment. � DAILY OPERATINGJSCHEDULE: The daiIy operating schedule of the above Iamps shall be from approx- imately one-half hour after sunset until one-half hour before sunrise. • � . � � OUTAGES: If illumina.tion fro.� aay lamp is interrupc:d and said illumination is not resumed within 24 hours from the time Company receives nouce thercof from Custorner, 1/30 of the monthly rate for such Iamp shall be deducced for eac;-� night of nonillumination after sizch notice is received. ' , ' ' � , ' '' _ . r � Da re � A.�x'il_1-�1��2 _ Sapersedes Rate Schedule A Da:ed Z1d�� f � . � '. � ' . � .. � . . � . ' .. . � � � 1 1Li �.. .. , FoaM 132•1434 (7•7�) Rate Schedule B To Street Lighting Concract Dated Apri ],,, 1972 � OR�AMfHTAL STREET tIGN71 G '' ' ustomer wne � AVAILA$ILITY: AvaiIable Eor year-round itluminacion of pu6Iic streets, parkways, and highways by eIec- uir lamps mounted on standards where Customer owns an Omamental Street Lighting syscem complete with �, standards, Iuminaires with globes, lamps and other a�npurtenances, together wich all aecessary cables ex- tending between standards and co poincs oE conReccion co Company's facilities as designated by Company. f i ' RATE: .. i. . Numbet of Daily �lonchly � Lamps per Operaung Race per Designation of Lamps Luminaire ScheduIe Luminaire �J�� +00 Wa�t Mercury Vapor 1 -. AN �3.50 ' . . � ' , r . . - , _ ' . . : _ � SERVICE INCLUDED I�I RATE: Company shall furnish all electric 'energy necessary to operate Customer's • Ocnamencal Street Lighting system, shall make alI lamp and globe renea�als, clean the globes, light and extinguish all lamps, �make aII f,aIlast renewals and furnish all the mateuals and labor necessary therefor. ' Customer shall keep its cables, ornamental standards, foundations and fittings in a safe and workable con- . dition and cepIace cables, wiring, ornamentaI scandards and appurtenances thereto, if such replacement becomes necessary as the result of damage by coliision, accidents, Acts of God, or any other cause not ,' arising from some act of Company. DAILY OPERATI�IG SCHEDULE: The daily operating scheduIe of the above lamps on the AIl-night (A�T) _� sche�ule shall be from appro�imately one-half hour after sunset unul one-half honr before sunrise, and on the blidnight (bi�') schedule shall be from approximately one-haIf hour after sunset until midnight (Centrai Standard Time). . - � � �' OUTAGES: If iIIumination from any Iamp is interrupted and said illumination is not resumed within 24 hours from the time Company receives-notice theceof frum Cusromer, 1/30 of the monthly rate for such �, lamp shall be deducted for eaci� nioht of nonilluniination afcer such notice is received. I ' � . � , I j ' , ' Date�ril 1� 1912 � Supersedes Rate Schcdule B pated NO1�T�� i� � � OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Ma.rch 1, 1972 � MEMO T0: THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: REPORT ON "OPERATION IDENTIFICATION" Some of you may be aware of a program by the subject title which has been used with success as a crime prevention program for home burglaries. You may be interested in the attached article from the February 29, 1972, issue of the Wa11 Street Journal which is attached to this report. I had asked for a report from the investigation division of this matter and the means of implementing it, This report is attached. As you can see in the report, the cost is minimai to participate in this program. I would recommend that you direct the City Administration to implement "Operation Identification". Very respectfully, �b�� 2. Gerald R. Davis City Manager GRD/ms \ � ,' ', , � '`� � — � : ._�� 1 n_ . _ , , • � - � �. . . MEt�iO T0: Chief E. W. McCarthy ' , • F'ROM: Investigator Parquette I . ' . DATE: January 19, 1972 SUBJECT: Operation Identification I .' . . As per your request, I have researched both the cost and operational I, aspects of this program. The following�parao aphs will explain the cost factor as �rell as my recorrunendations for making the plan . � operatile. I' The approximate total cost of.the ro am initiall will b 5 P �' y e $2 5.00, :, which includes the cost of decals, set up costs, art work necesse.r�y and the engravers. A breakdown of th� costs can be found on attached sheet number one. ' . My information is that there are approximately 6,000 private '; , dwellings in the City. Taking into consideration that probably � 40°v of these peop].e wotzld take advantage of the gragram, I feel that 2,500 decais will be sufficient. . - . ', The rnethod of marking valuable items with an individual's social. security number, as you pointed out, would probably be the b2st . . due to the fact that the number is permanently assigned and is ' easily recognizable throughout the United States. Sn the event that any of the marked items were stolen, the � ' description o� the item as well as the social security number � would be. entered in the P�SIIr�CTS system and NCTC. This would insure return of the item(s) in the event th�t any other juris- _� dietion should make an inquiry about them. The dec�)s will be grovided free of charge to persons who have � ' m�rked their pr�perty. The decals are to be �laced at what would be usual points ot entry for a bu=�glar in an effort'to advise would-be burglars that the items in the home have identifyin� marks. - ' . To insure return of the en �aver or to hel defra � p y the cost of I replace�ent in the event that it is not returne3, I feel tnat ' the person borrcwir.g it should be required to place a$5.00 deposit on the unit, refundable upon return. Persons borrowing the units should also be required to show prope: identification as well as sign an agreement for its return. (See attached sheet ' num.ber tr�o. ) ' ' -- _� � -_ 1�' �.�� i -; _ : � _ . � _ _ _ _ _. _ ,�...�,m,., � � . . _ . . ��-� .' .� Operation Identification . ' . Page �2 � ' ' : . To minimize the cost to the City, all monies collected as deposits on the engravers should be kept in the Police � • � Department and would be refunded upon receipt of the unit. This shou].d eliminate the need of the City's Bookkeeping _- Department from becoming involved, as no fees as such ; - would be collected. �; � � # � A record book noting to whom the eng�.�avers were loaned i` as well as the date of loan and return would be kept. . j;'� A periad of three days shouZd be more than suffic•ient for ' � . persons to mark their valuables. i - _ . ;' ' A full set of instructions in the use of the engraver, � . ; where to place the decals, the social security number, as E' � well as how the system works, would be provided to each � t; ' � participant. i. � . 4" I am sure that the Iocal newspapers would be more than happy `� to provide coverage on the prograri as a means of advising . � • � , � citizens of its availability. ' , , ' - RJP/md ' � , ' �" . . • � � � ,� , . �� , . ' 1 ' - � _ ' ' _ ' �: � : ; . ,� ,.,:.�;� : . . _ _ - j . ' � _ j � � � ��f � t. - ! , . � . _ _ ; . , s�r rl�:�s�.� orr� � .� I , ' • . .. ! . COST BREt1�DOG.�,' . . , ' '� ' - 2500 decals � • C� .06� each �i50.00 I , . ; Cost of dies arid set up reuired in the decal n�aking process 24.(�0 � . ' � � R �rt �rork required for d�cals k5.�0 I 3— engravers Q$12.C�Q each 36.00 ' , � . j . $25�.� ; ' . ._ . ''� . _ _ .' . . . . _ : Estimate on the deca2.s from Tho�s & Associates 617-11th Av�. So. I�Ipls. '�, �� rr �► art tiork needed from Art Tech Asseciates 6229 Cniversity DTE Fridley Price on �he engravers obtai_n�d fra� S:. S. Darley Co. I�i�lrose Park, IZlinois . ' ' ` ' _ , ' � ' � I ' � : ' k 1" � ' ' , � L_� ' � f__� ' ' � , ' � 'I � I f �or� �.sk a B�z��rgla�r• To See Yoicj" .EtCjll�il,bs, H�e ll�lay T Vell Go ��.zv�y s � � _ Proaram to �Iark O«-n::r's ID . 4n G�ocl� Helps Deter 7.'heft, ,. AicLs �Rec��•er3-, Cities Find� By Ro�.iLn G. Sr.�� Sta� R!porter oJ T�s �;.►r.L S:a��x Jota � �t, Iast fait, tiew Orlears police raided a "trnce" aIleoedly selting stole�i me:ct�3.z:dise and fot:�d over ;IGO,QG6 in goods. But.there w•as # just one cl�a leadi�Q to a riaht.ui o:caer: a• driver's license numb?r ekc�ed ui.cn a portable Sony televisioa set. The palice pIuoged the numhe: inta a com- puter, atono ;•,•ith a can:rat reais:ry ot d�-iver's license numoers and an ind�:i ot reporte3 s'o- len gaods, ti�,'i�i:in L�ree r.z�nutes, t.iz hot szt was idenEitied as belongir.a to ilrs. Herae:t Jahnck� Jr. oC :�e•x O:;ea�s, lirs. Jzraci:e put iiE: �Z %i3ri� bncau�e she had pa.i'ticipa!ed in a gro:��no n�tioi:al pru- gram, caIi>3 O��r�tiun Identi:icatio�. It's proF-i�� to a gro«-i�o n-iMC.er o' ci�iza�s �naE, when it comc'S t0 YC?15"3*CI:1� L1.�I1:9� tre etch- ing pen is mightier t: sa the s:,ord. � The proo arn ma; aIso da:er btzrolars �ra-� maticalt3•. Zn_ 1lontere; Pa*:;, Calif., ti�e G,G00 homes tliat doa't ta'se Fa�t L� it ha�e su.`;:era� 2,G�� burgtaries s:nce 196.;. EuE ot ii;e 5,000 homes t'r,at do garticipate, �n:y ?.0 have baen burgled in t;:e aama pe:,�d. Oparation Idaa`iiication, 2 vo?t�ntary p_c� gr�.m that a o o�v:ng nur:ihe� o: lo�al r l;c� da- partr.ien`s ari ser�ice g-^e�t,: ;,b.;- s�nso:, tends intii�•idua� citize;;s e,ec't::c erbra;-Lin in- str�mer�:s. Tire pars c�st tf:e I�zd�rs �bout $10 apiece, a.:rt �o:n:^:?:s ttse 4:e;�i to in>Criba an I�i?ilC1=}'L10 �i��rk,. u�4a.'.',;- z -dri.�.:'s iica;�s_ nur_iber, on �n}•uano :ro�[ '�`4' sa.s �a iav,e:ry. T=e bo�rou-e:s keeg t•,-:!tte.z r�cor�ls o_' k;:at the,�• hsi•e msrt:ed ar,d :�-re�e. T'r�= i�':ea, i; to mak? fl:a p,'•.a30331�Yi5 Ed51iy tt'3Ci:�piEi St:OL'i!: krey ba sto'en. DefYrrent 3Jec,��s Atcer the� 11a.'rZ L2^la:;CCI IS23ii:iC� L'LIEir proc- erty, particioa.-�rs s?ap up fr�e decz,s o1 �eei!• wind�;✓s a�d do•,rs. The deczls re�3: •'tiZ'e ha•!2 ]o:Ii?�j OPr:f'ATIO\ FD_'^�tiI`Ii�IC�!`IU:i. A!1 ite;t!s o� vz,ue o1 ti:=_sa pre,r.ises i:�.�•a bee_1 mar':e3 !OL• *ccdj' ��i_IILSfiC<1�=V : Gj �2'r! 8:l."O.ce. II12rit 2�2.*iC:?3," , Tn� o��._.__s ::o;� t.at b�� •�s �i��.a ' ^ t ' '-.b"' al�i.'',- �i'B;itG�� '...•t e�C�:i JOLC:.�.r l.�il::� y_ i ' o sae I li1�:r etc:i: . Pc;:,. ___}• a- x3 ur - �:1;0';,� Zc:_.. .. �..,°GT I�3 75 2�_ f_3^j f0 8':� J•^� i I�tii^st T�JO.iSnc�i,):rCC:�3:..SF23 S^ E�b:�„�"2� ' � c�' :m•i`.3, � tion to ;�il. Op>raur,n Ide: titi.�a':on al;,r;3��3 i: 195;. Wt?CA .'.:Ott`^f^cj' Pd�:�- POi�t;E (,`::i2: E�-c'�2i;. F. FTo?? �day ina�,ourate•3 ii to co�:^at a g:�:*:ir,; bu:;lar� prabta:�t i:, t:ie tou-:. Sir.ce •`_'�rr., .ne to•.:n's tot=i „i�� rat� r. been �� Iir.ieo. O '1 L� t , �r ; } e ^ . i(2- .:,_.. U�_ _.. .O � _ C� ' . ':' J._.._ �._�_ i: l� i:��:,:a. `o , mo:a ':��n ; �:- �' ' ;;::) COL!::li:�i;;ii.S stre`_c'r.:n; !:ont Fior,olu�u to \e,;a.r::, :7.J., hat•e started Oper� Liun I:ez!i.ic�',c:n p-o- grscis. Asi1•� irom ��:ice de^ar!me ;`s, ]ocal chsptrrs o! tii� �et.•ice-orier,!ed \z•`.ioa�l Ex- chasge Ciub, hra�•e ��;; �_^�•_. �:_r;__., o: ti�e e:;� � 'L'h:� •u� k.ro.� _ ,^: or :.�,:�dint IJi. t.r{� �Y� :..:1 if.'..'_��}) Jc, : T�. _:_�j::..? a SIS�I:�_., li:'�� ;C1^1 1'(�, .. i: ., ::'.', - ,i°LI' 1• `}7.2i The as�aclattuii's ltichigan ' chapter �gar-e ' Op�ratlon ,Identi!tcatton a majoc boost lasi spri^o �ti•hea i: 1.R!I'O��uC_(: ;he conce�., iirst !n Saginaw, uien state�ti•ide. lfore than 20 tlichi• gan clttes arz noN in�olved, and a�ain early ras�its are bad news for burgiars. Po!ice in Laxisir.o, Co: e�ampte, report onI}• 1� burglaries since Jane in �,o�43 gsrttcipating ho�le; tnere, a much lo�ver :ate than usua,I lor tna city. A'ork° 27:e 3ns�rer Is �'es One quest!aZ has b�za �;•hether the program could R•ork in Iaroe cities. Ir. \e�v OrI>ans, 2t leask, the ans�a•er is ;es, accordir.o to po!ica there. !LIarme3 by a 3� � juzip in bur;Iat3es in tne fi:st thrze months o! Iast }•ear from the like 1969 perfod, police la.st april be;an a bur�lary erackdoc�-n. I� inel�sfled lendin; 150 engracers in a heavil}° pu3I:cized �paration Identification pro;ram e�, :�izir.o homes and btuinesses which had been :obbad before. Tiie re�cFt: Eve.y montii since 3fay, the number o: burglaries in Kew OrIear,s has dropped, somatimes bp as much as 33 �, frorrt the correspo:�dEng mor;�n in 1953. The burglary totaI for ai! of I�71 ende3 ug 3�'o balo-,c- 1959. Of 2,500 homes an3 busir.esse; �vith marl;ed items, only one h•�° baen robbecl (tifrs. Ja�nc;ce's). O�er.�tian F�:er.ti;icatiel isn't ti;e saa reason tur tna :;a°; O:Iea,,� d�cl;ne, but FoIice b?liet•e ft "p;%i�•ed a r;� jor roIe," sa�•s Po;tca Sbt. �5'i1- lia.m tio'.��. '°�'z ha�•e raliable L�orrnation fz•om lindaz;;ori3 snuL•ces tnat bu:o,ars are �c•atcii:no o�lt r•zr5� intent�y for tite stici:ers," ha Sa}3. � . � . . . . Tnz tieed f�r Uil'.'v132'S' deterrent is'uroent, Eurglary is �meiica's comnionest crime. There tivera neari}• 2.� iniliioa burglarIes ot res. � idences and bssinesses in 1970, up ;?�Jo from 1505, according to the latest available Federal Bureau of Ln��esii;ation statlstics, property Io�ses totaIed ,a,2 mil:ion in 19T0, or $3?0 per heist, scJS tire F'n^I. - Only abouF ar.e i:i 2i�-e buraiaries is solved, B�std�s, ef thz :�e1a!iwe:y ;;;��u percer.2soe ui stoien g��-?s L�at �Iice recover, a 1?rga s::a*z can't b� ide. ti;ie3. "V; e put tip setreral nii:lion �iotl?r� «rorth af unciaimed items for pubtir, eale ev�ry. year," say; a spokesmzn fur tha W�=hinbton, D.C., polic� dapartrr.ent, ahich it. s�If pla�;s to launch an engraving pro„ram tvithin tha n�tit few wee',•.;. .The proorz.r.ts increas;roly tnterest busin�ss � concerns; �vhick mi�t contend ��vith a riain,; ' nuinFer ot trt=�;s. As��cia�ed Builders �: C,en• -t�actors Ina,•a arottp o: contractor.; tn Silver FF!'L.na� tiirl., recentty atarted a pro;ram ot lending enoras;r�„ 'equ:pn:e�t Yo bui!der:: and I hameowners. p,-,a hie raasan: :n a survey tne � g�oup' conc'.u�te:;, the ?2 rnembers pcllcd said they av��r.�;ed o�•er S_On,r�p a year in lo:s,; (rom tne tne�t of equi?menk. , Of cou�:se, pperati�n Identification [sn't seen as a r.cre-aIL Some !a�.v enforcem=nl au- thorities doun: t�at lar�e numb��r� of pcop(e woulA tane the t[me to er,arave tneir pns;es• sionc. Btit tne la��;men are enth�:siastic about auch pro�rams il particigs!ior, ic �ti�id�s;�read and i' cti� tr.::� , n•.4 xi�t i= b�;^,� do�� I`� .'O `?c l�nA_ Ct'1? ZP'{�. T,}-C' �'. � 1:II!'- arc,^ :l� _.,_.. . `f.c...;�.n. �re r,tar.i,:,, . � r. .he� (:OR�t T'i'rifC: �:;?.* : `C0:^.(3 '!�. .��.3}'S S .i�On•'.± m�r, for t�ie \:lCf:�RR �ro�ip, "�b'e've ev�� had Qpera!ion I�tenti•`_icar�ort pa:ter.; put up in the jr.i.s.' �� n� ��Y i _ � I � � �. : " _ ' 1 1 1 ' ITEM #12 � ' . �' For discussion Monday night. City Administration w o u l d I i k e f u r t h e r d i r e c t i o n f r o m t h e C i t y C o u n c i l i , in regard to acquiring easements. I ' I ' I � I � r � .� �� _ �� t . . ..a. _ .....�.:.; � i2 a _. � MEMO T0: MEMO FROM: MEMO DATE: RE: Gerald Davis, City Manager Harvey J. McPhee February 23, 1972 Activity Report Attached is my activity report for th2 fourth quarter of 1971. HJM/de 0 � ' �/ c�-U-=-�-1 _ �/'�','% `/'��----- HARVEY J. MCPH�� Public Heal� Sanitarian � 13 11. PUBLIC HEALTH SANITARIAN ' OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, DECEMBER ACTiVITY REPORT . 7373 Central Avenue N.E, Visited food establishment to check new license and discuss recent sanitary survey. 100 Ventura N.E. Rechecked litter problem several times. Some improvement. 5801 22 Street N.E, Litter complaint; checked and talked to owner. 533 Janesville Street N.E. Litter Complaint; checked and talked to new ocmer; Litter now cleaned-up. 5290 3rd Street N,E. Litter complaint; checked and wrote letter to owner. 490 Fairmont Street N.E. Request for service on insect prablem. Visited and discussed. 7855 East River Road Reviewed plans for recreational area of Apartment Complex. 25 - 44th Avenue N.E, Pigeon complaint. Called owner and then talked to their exterminator. 7298 Highway �65 Reviewed plans for business and made several visits with final approval for license. 6483 University Avenue N.E, Consultation on possible remodeling. 680 Ely Street N.E; Several rechecks, order issuel and two violation tags issued. Appeared in Court for trial and found guilty. Has been cleaned-up. 6116 Stinson Blvd. N.E, Rat complaint; checked and talked to complainant. 501 Glencoe N.E, Litter Complaints. Order issued to several property owners. Majority of litter removed, and remainder will be removed in spring. 5940 East River Road Rusty hoot water complaint. Previous problem on iasects in building checked and sent another letter to owner. �277 CentraZ Avenue N.E, Additional review of plans taith letter to owner. 7651 Central Avenue N.E. Odor complaint. Checked but found no problem. Called complainant. _ L ..� �" � , � , 1 � � r� ' i C ' . ' @ � �J .� � � ' ' � � J ' 7315 Highway ��65 N.E, Checked three times and found insanitary conditions. On last survey sent letter to new operator and main office. 900 E. 71st Street N.E. . Litter complaint; checked and sent Zetter to owner. 5541 Sth Street N,E, Litter and junked car complaint; checked and order issued. Several rechecks and additional letters written. Finally cleaned up. 6054 4th Street N.E, Litter complaint; checked and wrote letter to owner. � 5955 3rd Street N.E. Recheck on a clean-up order. Has been corrected. 1050 52nd Avenue NoE. Water seepage complaint. Checked and sent letter to owner. 6061 University Avenue N.E. Litter complaing; Sent letter. Rechecked and sent a second letter. 695 - 57th Avenue N.E. Litter investigation. Wrote letter. 580 57th Avenue N.E. Litter complaint; checked and it has been corrected. 6414 Van Buren N.Eo � , Recheck on a clean-up order; Improvement, no further action. 1061 - 67th Avenue N.E, Litter complaing; checked and issued a clean-up order. Rechecked and a second letter sent. • .. .. �,_.��' �_ � 13 f { 5537 - 5th Street N.E, � Recheck on clean-up order and not done. 5460 - 7th Street N,E, Rusty water complaint; checked and sent letter to owner. 155 Satellite Lane Squirre2 complaint; Visited caretaker and discussed problem. No quick solutian. Report to City Manager. 6680 Lucia Lane N,E. Rusty hot water complaint; checked and sent letter to owner. , 895 - 73rd Avenue N.E, Recheck on CZean-up order and has been corrected. 7620 University Avenue N,E, Rat and litter complaint; checked and issued a clean-t:p order. ` _ ; _ � �� ..-- f � �1 � 1207 Gardena Avenue N.E, ' Litter complaint; checked and sent another letter. Same problem previously. 3710 East River Road ' . Survey of construction progress and sent letter to owtter. 6161 Highway �� 65 N.E, Survey of construction progress and sent letter to owner. 620 Osborne Road N.E. • Fina1 inspection and approval of license application. 7921 Riverview Terrace N,E, Litter investigation and letter to owner to clean-up. 7901 Riverview Terrace N.E, Litter invesigation and letter to owner to clean-up, 5401 4th Street N.E, Litter recheck at request of Bob Aldrich. Letter to owner to clean-up. 6065 Central Avenue N.E, Complaint from this address on two adjacent litter problems. Investigated and contacted owner of adjacent property. �. ...:y�# �3 � � � ! � � � � . . _ � , ' � , .� n � ��i) � -� � �- , ; �, U RESOLUTION N0. I A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY FOR TH IMPROVEMENT OF SEWER AND WATER SERVICE IN THE VICINITY OF $LOCK 1, OAK HILL ADDITION WHEREAS, the City of Fridley is desirous of making certain water ' . and sewer improvements in and adjacent to Bl�ck 1, Oak Hill Addition. WHEREAS, the Wydee Company has agreed to deed certain easements ' to the City of Fridley along said Block 1 as indicated on the attached Exhibit marked enclosure �'�1, in consideration of getting some property marked as Parcel A on the attached exhibit. - ' , , ' 1 .' ' ' ' WHEREAS, the City of Fridley is the fee owner of said Parcel A. WHEREAS, the Wydee Company is desirous of getting a deed to Parcel A from the City of Fridley. WHEREAS, the City of Fridley is in possession of the necessary easements from the Wydee Company. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows: The Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to execute a deed for Parcel A transferring the title to the Wyde�Company. ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITX OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY � , o� _ , � oF � l�-�..�! � �.�� , i 9 � z . �� ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell ' . MAYOR - Frank G. Liebl � ��+_-� 14 � . � � _ , _. _ - �� -- . �a � .: :� � � � -�� . � . ��=R- . ; � � . � � .. � r.l.�._- �3fi a � � ,� . , � � r . ` .____ _"�.. _ _` _. ..� i ��; . f ' i . ' : - ` � ' , _ � '• a • i � �� l0 • . �' � f - 0 0 � ° v, az n • . _ , � � � N � � --; � . 'I ' r _ - - � - � '� , ,� � . � � - - _ _ _ _ __. _. , • . � �F_5t � /:l:,�isC�,J _ j � � .�:�. :-T,.,. �.. ..:�. �,.,. � t -- . � I I . � � , fj� j ' ; E�s�' � %Y�fa�so.j � I ' � � � i . �� _ � .r . � ee i ; � N t,� ; ' � ; C� ' � � n � � � _ , � � � � � (i� .�:�� :�.. ...�,,. �;� .� ...o:.. o a ,1 � � -- - , � s -, i P, � � �. � � r � � ; I 1 � � �: � � E � C + ' ' � , a F i � i � . , � n, ==t , i t ; ' ' � 3 � ( � C ' � , � O � � � . � - � � - .. ri � t I � A o � � �� i ; � � � � tw A � t � [ n e N' C a - + Q L p � � '. s � a � � � � i � . o I� j $ . � . � i ; i �i � .' � ti . - � , �. 1. ,. � � �, o � , r � � � J c `_' . . . , � C � !, i . �� :, � -- ------- � -- ----- � -� i � ; � �' . - - � �7 ; � c:i s.z r.c ...� ..►� .a ,: � w .c-s � e� � � ` 4/ S� s„��`--�" F'�RC E � f� �' o � . � ' � � . i ' ' Op i�) ' �/.%� ('j .� r� Q rr� �_._----'--�------�-�.- . _ .. . , i ' I3,r i . . . � ,I, : � . � y ,. � • A U � �� . " �� . � . �� . � . �� ' -� � . ~ ' CLAIMS 3-6-72 GENERAL: #27857 through #278g2 LIQUOR: #6462 through #6475 �J _ _ . _ : , _ __ -,,. _ _ _ . . --�• _�- ( LIST OF LICF?�IS�S TO BE A°?�O��D RY T�iE CI't'Y C�'.?`TCIL AT T_vF' T�'[�ETI�yG OF �1A'_?CH 6, 1972 - �'h j ," - i � � I. TYPE OF LICE�IS � �zt APPROTT�,D BY F� � ; IPublic Dance North Air Home Association 6831 Ntay. 65 , fee � Fridley, r;inn. Police waived � , Public Dance St. :�lilliam Catholic �hurch ; � 6120 - 5th St. fee � Fridley, i�2inn. Police waived i ' - , � I' . � , ' , ' , � ' � ' ' I - ' �r � � � � . � NORTH AIR HOIl�+�E �►S�QCIATlON 6831 HIGHWAY f65 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 Fe'oru�_r;y� 28, 1�72 Citi�, Council uf FriuleJ I�:r. F. I,iebl, T:i�.y or Fridle;y , �,=i��eaot�. R�;: Grdin�:nce i3u. 492 �e�r Sirs: Re��.ru�n� your neva ord�_rl�nce i�o. 492, ��r«ica reqaires �. peruiit t',0 COi.iC'tl;iCZ iJtib�1�; Cic:.Z1C@S. 'ii0 �.'1iA iv0i'�_1 g',lZ' �"rOi:lE.' :iSSOC1c�'i1011 �novyn ��.s �he KliiU��ts oz ::olL,..�bus ri�.11 is 2 norl-��roiit Ir:inn- eso �� Co=r�orc:tion. �'Te OLZZJ' sl�onsv-r t�ao l�ublic el��i�czs u ye�r. Orie is iield St. P��z-ric?�'s i��;;T �:.!ia t��e o �:�e-r rie �ci i�evv Ye�.r's Eve. Our h- 11 is i�eld for c1Lto �:c�tivi �ics ��ia �ve rex:t t��ie rzG.11s to priv�.�e �r�oui s suc� ss :�e�.di��s, arL�iver�s�ries, ��lu union neet- ir��;s . �i'�_1Pii@V EY �; b�'1Vc `t,E,' 1 �:�' �y iic�.S c.'�- CiciI10E � 4"r2 i1� VE 1i1 �"i�l@ i�� S�"i been usi�z� ;�our ois duzy y�c�ice�.��.�� i ��e Fric.lcy's p�__ice force, , wnicn co��lies to ;��c-�io�� 1��. 3. `iJe, .iercoy, z°Gc�L�eUt txie i:ee os `�;25.00 ;.�er y-e�.r be vv�.ivad, t�i��.t rve as c; non-��oi'-- ;, co �j>o�°�::.tian f�_ll iY1 �o �:;cti�i� =;o . 2 0�' ��ovs otc�iriG�lce . l�il:l.:[l:��Tlv � QLl lIl �=CLVc�,llC-C "�01' ��:iG c�OV@ i-C'(�LlE.-'S't;. Yo��r;� �ra�Y, .T �-�� . i � - ��;. . �. � {- � i .'��. 1'Jl��i�� t_ Ii =i�.' _;;, r J;:it�l.! _ lili�! i' / ' � �'• �� 1+.2.1'i� l;i:`@21T�y � .t'1'C:;l.C.ent 1€� � � :� t APPLICATION FOR MUNICIPAL LICENSE - Standard Form State of Minnesota� ) ss County of Anoka ) 70 THE C1TY COUNCIL OF TNE ClTY OF FRlDLEY: , 1�d 0 ihe undersigned hereby�makes application for a license to conduct the business � of : ,,'�!-�--�!„� � t.J • (3�c� �z-� � � „ . /� � �ocat i on of Bus i ness _ri � 3 �� /V �� J �l • ,�' : ,, � � .,�.,�� Term of License 19 TO 19 License Fe� $ , � 0rdinance No.. The undersigned agrees to conduct said business in accordance with the applicable laws of the STATE OF MtNNESOTA and the Ordinances of THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. Special Gonditions G,t� ? �� Receipt # Licensc # Date �I rev. 1 1-70 ��I! �''' -C-,/�- Gi'`"t, ��°>,._2 C�!'!� -�/�C_', l��-�/i `�� / Nam� of Applicant�%!,-��"^��'-/'n��'.)/��e�•� , �%;s. s� �1,-- , j- Address �' � � - �,Z��,,�� ,�/Z.�; �,�t:,�� 71 F _ � //� ` 2.�_ --�_—� ��-- ��%=F=�' � � � r. � '' : i ' ' 1 ' ' ' � A.D°LICATIO:,� FOZ ?I�31,IC P��,?r� . DATr� 'S �� . . itA;. U Oy 4?PL1CA"T Or Q�:s�?'�IZ!�11C�;�i S�' W ti ��I Q G'•�( CCl�t�rJ(;�,%1.t,►Y'� '�r�� SS � t '�-� 5��.�_� '�'1 � � . P'_-i0i�� NU?-I3:�� C) ._ y � �7�� . - LOC�1 t IOtd On D 1?�iC � �� U r u� � cl Sc' �tit P_ v1� - . � SIZ�, 0� D�'I�3 A'3�.� , ��C� X lC:C� � J.�IL ��V_�1.��17J TV i]J 1JJLTJ.� S�:`_L'.:: �� OjL nri�J s J.1.IVJ � jRll.lii.�LTT� � �9 ' . . � HA` s VG�J E�rR B��i COfirITC'i•�.D 0� A F��Q�T`I OR GROSS ��iISD{;-i,�i�tOR �°IiThT�1 THE P�iST r I�I� Yr��? vtc I L�?��.3Tn:�ID A?��C� OFKIC�R OR P��:�� G�'�'IC�_'S r•"JS� �,� ?�S��iT �T ALL t�� -�L-T.II�� S41D Pu�LIC D�'�:C_� IS B�l�d� h�D. t� �� ' I�:?� C��'�T_�'Y 1lr�i TH� A?0�� I��'J?�i�^IC.; IS TRU� 4�� CG��^`�', �.'� I� L'i�L!�?5�'00� �i:�' S�''.•1T111'`T�'r hTV� F=�JJ T1'�'rQ�1L}11!��.�� .:-?I5 �?�'JIC" il0i�� `:'T�T�J BJ rt�.J�Vt�D A:��1� 3� SJ:;J�,�',,T ^1G L:r�:1I, 4C1IOid. � ____�!`��._ _____ L�CJi�iS:�1 �LJ 1 E.�'t�I�.�fiIO'; DA?'� ��'�"L�V(�{�' •V ��' .� ..�i.��. � � ,�� . SI!::`; ^_1li �� 0: A??%�IC_�'�iT _:_� � �� .. � � G�''i t�',' •'� S: ��-�--C`'�Z�. �. L3.��'�� l�t,�`� Y"'rt,��! LIr�-%C.F2.0 ✓'1 `�'%C,��'-f.-�C-�j�. U'— — __ .__ , �� .,� _,�....�.._. _s_.__...______._____ �`'`=� �`�i`zZZ �- E-�� . %}-2,C..�u�� t `,�Zt--�� " �'3 L� ,�C? r! �'?Zi �- --�--•--- --- -- - -•- � __ _ '�`1V�_ ��.'J ��l'l• ' R:;� ;! : 1 :;c.�. �F,'�i;� �.D �:T ' ' � � � ESTIMATES FOR APPROLIAL AT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1972 . Nodland Associates, Inc. Alexandria Minnesota 56308 PARTIAL Estimate No. 1 for work completed for the construction of Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and Watermain Improvement Project No. 102, � according to contract Dunkley Surfacing Co., Inc. 3756 N. E. Grand Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55421 PARTIAL Estimate No. 5 for the construction of Water Main, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Project 103 - Innsbruck North Suburban Engineering, Inc, - 6875 Highway No. 65 N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 . PARTIAL Estimate No. 5 for the Inspection time through 2/18/72 for construction of utilities in Innsbruck North Project 103 PARTIAL Estimate No. 5 for the staking of utilities in Innsbruck North - Billing thru February 25, 1972 .��.. .. ... .. __ . ..: .3� }.. " -'-' _ . �`'l $ 15,258.70 6,457.51 504.28 756.80 ' ' �� February 28, 1972 MEMO T0: CITY COUNCIL � FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: 1971 EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS The attached sheet shows interest earned by the City of Fridley during the year 1971 on investments of temporarily idle funds, Earnings for the year totaled $333,765.60. 7he interest earned by each fund is retained in that fund as required by law and is credited as income of the fund earning the interest. A large portion of the interest earned is for special assessment funds. When special assessments are prepaid, the City is no longer collecting interest on the assessments and it is, therefore, very important that the City do a good job of investing the money it has collected on prepaid assessments so that there will be sufficient money in the assessment fund. Interest earned by construction funds is credited against the cost af the project. Interest earned on funds that require tax levies means that less taxes wiTl have to be 7evied during the coming year for that fund than would otherwise be the case. As an example, in the case of the General Fund, part of the estimated receipts for each budget contains an item entitled estimated interest earnings. , ' , , ' , 1 s ' i ' � ' INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1971 General Fund Civic Center � Principal and Interest Park Bonds - Principal and Interest State Aid Fund P.E.R.A. Public Utility Operat�ng Accounts Public Utility - Principal and Interest Public Utility Reserve Accounts Public Uti1ity Construction Accounts Water Bonds of 1960 Municipal Liquor Operating Accounts Revolving Special Assessment Fund Regular Special Assessment Fund Par[cs � P-10 Project SW -� 48 - Principal and Interest SW - 50 - Construction Accounts W- 75 � Principal and Interest SS - 82 , Construction Accounts SW - 84 -� Construction Accounts SW - 87 � Construction Accounts SW - 91 , Construction Accounts SW , 92 - Construction Accounts SW � 93 - Construction Accounts SS , 100 Constructian Accounts SW , 100 , Principal and Interest $ 29,836.56 587.98 1,497.28 28,601.89 1,029.69 30,536.31 606.51 1,652.27 18,834.74 755.04 10,602.83 7,561.13 77,332.78 25.25 4,194.66 597.34 12,039.75 876.98 50.50 37.87 50:50 12.62 1,154.56 1,218.89 422.31 0 � g�� INVESTMEIVT EARNINGS 1971 Page 2 SS, S& W- 103 Construction Accounts 1968 Street - Construction Accounts 1969 Street , Construction Accounts 1969 Street - Principal and Interest ]970 Street - Construction Accounts 1970 Street � Principal and Interest Bonds of 1960 Bonds of 1962 Bonds of 1963 Bonds of 1965 Bonds of 1967 Sonds of 1970 Refunding Bonds $ 4,466.23 1,232.72 542.87 166.36 883.75 1,894.95 28,429.09 4,538.99 16,782.36 11,138.20 21,176.49 5,398.29 6,999.06 $333,765.60 � � � �: r , ' , ' �Jo 2fi85 (Pub. Ex Form Dl — Revised 1969) _ _ _.__.. __ ------ ___ ------._________...----------------- � � REPORT OF OUTSTANDING OBLIGATIONS � { At December 31, 19 � � ( �� Miller-Davis Co., Minneapolis ' j C�ty of Fri d1 ev __ I Office of the Accountin Officer of the � Village of � �To the County Auditor: g i • Town of ,' Schaol District No. � ; Anoka Count , bZinnesota. Other � y i i ' I ;'' . Outstanding Obiigations* Amount 1. dutstanding, Jan. 1, 19 � � - - _ _� 9, 672 , 000 , 0 2. Issaed during 19 �� - - - _ _ 955 , 000 , 0 3. Total (line 1 plus line 2) - - - _�10,627,000.0 � , 4. Paid during 19 �� - - - _ _ _ 972,000.0 � ; 5. Outstanding, Dec. 31, 19 � � - _ _ _� 9, 655 , 000 ** E � Outstanding Obligations at December 31, 19 �� i�` Pur ose of Issue Amount � p j' ! 6 Civic Center � 425,000.00' � ', ' ' Park Bonds 105,000.00� 7. . Public Utility Revenue 75,000,00 8. � Water Improvement 1,175,000,00 .' 9. ; 10. SPecial Assessment (Permanent) 6,270,000.00 li. Special Assessment (7emporary) 1,605,000.00 ''' 12. Total Outstanding Obligations - .- -�9 , 655 , 00� . 00 ' , •Line 3, minus line 4, must equal line S. � �#Line 12 must equal line 5. ,,„ NOTE: Fnclude obltgations having fixed maturity dates. ' ' , Balances in bond and inter- est fund or other funds which have Ueen set aside for payment of outstand- ing obligations - _ � 3 � �46 , 523 . 82 New obligations issued in 19 71 Purpose of Issue Special Assessment emporary � � 955,000.00 I Marvin C. Brunsel l , a c c o u n t i n g officer of the Ci ty of Fri dl ey ,(City, village, town, school district, other) � do hereby certify that this statement is � correct. ! 1 � �2.`•-� -�- / C (Accounting Officer) ' Dated this 29th day of FebrttarY� 19 �2 1--.---�—________..�_,_._ ---_.___�..__________! ��S��d7�:� � : � - �_ t��;� :L��i1 LJ��s�� :�i'i��:� _ . �� + . . MONi HLY INSPECTION R�PORT ' • ' , .. ' ��o�i�� j a�d;�� 9�� Kough tns: Nei� Construction � Footin s: New Construction Framings � Reinspections �or� I�ot Ready or Rej ected- - igns Sto —ror r�PostecT`-- Violations Checked �'� , Dangerous Buildings �: omp a nts �he— c�e-TT-- — •�' -- �� .�� . g:� isce aneous �� Finals : i�esidential ' _ - - ina s: Commercial � Indust. � • Total Inspections � � Permits Issued. Time Off/ Sick Leave Hrs. V^ Rough Ins : Neti�F Services Reinspections � • ' �Vork Not Read�or Rejected � �� rcgerous_BuildinaG �;;; �� l�iiscellaneous "� �� Fina2s: Residential �� . � -�� --- `�s C�j � � Finals: Comnercial � Indust. , c.� �� . �-�: �1 Total Inspections (. _� ��--� ' e� `�" Permits Issued l C �"A Ti.me QEf/ Sick Leave Hrs. r�� Rouah Ins : Ne��r Services -- �------ — ----- Reins ections - —p---- I, ``� jYork Not Read�_or Rej ected__ �� — - — - �o� Signs e�:� � _DciI1�E�'OU.S__�i'UI.�.dZL1�S�— -- �� 1�T15CE11c1I1°OUS � � ;, --- -- -- -- �',; Finals` �esidential �� Finals : Cor:ti�ierci al Indust . .rva------ ---- ---�— — -- (.�� Total Inspections I ' �ermits Issued � � Time Off/ Sick Leave Hrs: , , P��i:�b a� -. � Y��: ��.�2 � 19 72 + 19 71 Feb. � Feb. 10 2 2 Q 2 -- 0 2 11 3 1Q_- - ti �n . � �0 57 10 100 24 4 10 1 57 29 4 40 14 70 I6 � 15 1 28 . This Last Year Year To To Date Date 56 •2 ll3 _2 � — 2Q3 61 _0 82 39 4 L 59 �J , ' , ' • City of Fridley, Minnesota Office o� the Suilding Inspector TOPIC: MONTHLY R�PORT TO THE CITY MANAGER February, 1972 NU1�ER OF PERMITS ISSUED 1972 1971 THIS YEAR LAST YEAR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FEB. FEB. TO DATE TO DATE ' Residential Residential Garages Com. Alterations & Addn's. Res. Alterations & Addn's. , Multiple Dwellings Commercial � Industrial ' Municipal � Churches & Schools Hospita7s ' Signs Moving & Wrecking 9 OTHERS * 29 12 33 12 0 1 1 1 3 4 4 7 4 3 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 I 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 8 10 0 0 0 0 40 29 56 39 Heating 17 10 39 20 Plumbing 7 b 22 19 Electrical 15 28 49 59 39 44 110 98 ESTIMATED VALUATIONS OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Residential �' $ 2,634,980 $ 261,000 $ 2,728,6$8 $ 261,000 Residential Garages 00 20,000 2,193 . 20,000 Com. Alterations & Addn's. 6,260 14,900 23,260 2];,350 Res. Alterations & Addn's. 13,026 3,090 16,526 11,040 Multiple Dwellings 00 00 00 00 Com� rcial 00 4Q0,000 00 400,000 Industrial 100,335 00 435,182 00 Municipal 00 00 00 7,900 Churches & Schools � 00 00 53,689 00 Hospitals • 00 00 ' 00 00 Signs 3,200 2,700 6,200 3,050 Moving & Wrecking 00 00 00 00 $ 2,757,801 $ 701,690 $ 3,265,738 $ 724,340 � 141 Tosonhouses Included - 27 Permits TYPE Blacktopping Excavating Gas Genexal Heating House Moving & Wrecking Masonry Oil Heating Plastering Roof ing Signs - Well Drilling PERMZT NO `S 11310 -113/+6 8826 - 8840 5151 - 51b7 5508 - 5514 77-79 NUMBER OF LICENSES CURRENTZY IN EFFECT . AND LICENSE FEES COLLECTEA TO DATE NUMBER 10 16 35 117 43 2 27 8 5 2 10 0 75 FEES COLLECTED $ 150.00 240.00 525.00 2,925.00 645.00 30.00 405.00 120.00 T5.00 30.00 250.00 00 $5,395.00 0 PERMIT` FEES 1972 1971 THIS YEAR LAST YEAR TYPE FEBRUARY FEBRUARY TO DATE TO DATE BUILDING $7,659.00 $1,226.00 $9,471.25 $1,305.00 ELECTRICAL 341.55 2,056.25 878.80 2,411.25 HEATING 873.50 139.00 1,3�4.25 324.00 PLUNSI3ING 342 . 50 55 . 00 634 0 75 339 .00 SIGNS 60,00 1�2.00 24seoo _i9z.00 $9,276.55 $3,648.25 $12,537.05 $4,571.25 �