The URL can be used to link to this page

02/12/1973 PUB HEAR - 5604, MEMO TO DEPARTMENT FIEADS: pollowing are the "ACTIDN NEEDC.D" � the Admiaistrati,on. Anewere are due in the CiCy Mana$er's Office by Wednesday Noon, February 21, J,g7j, FRIDI,Ey CITY CQUNCIL AG�NAA - PUBLIC HEARING MEETING - FEBRUARY 12, 1973 - 7:30 P. M. 7:3k p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE; Giv�n. ROI.L CALL: p�l present, ADOPTION OF AGEN[]A: Add; Mike 0'Bannon - Proposal for City to receive Park land in PUBLIC E�ARfiNGS £ sewer assessment. H13. ' Public Hearing on Proposed Final Plat P,S. �672-08, Osborae p�aza, by Standard Oi.1 Company, Generally Located at 74Q4 Univereity Avenue N. E. ' ' ENGINEERING ' ' ' 1 ' 1 ' $Nf�NEERING No objections - Hearing C2osed at 7t40 p,m. ACTION NEEDgp; put this iGem on the next agenda. Public Hearing on Rezoning Request ZOA f�72-13 by City of Fridley: Pare of Out1o� H, Generally Located on the North $ide of I. 694 and 800' West of the East City Limits, to be Retoned from R-3A to G-2S and Puhlic Heaxing on a Spe��a� Use Permit, gp, �p7p_yp� by tha City o� Frfdley; Ta Permit in$tallatian of an Advertising giga ip a G-1S DistricC to he Located on OuCIoG H, Innsbrutk North, GQneFally �,ocated on the North Side o� �, 644 and 800' tdest of tne �pst Gi.Cy I.imits Objectl.ons expresged by area homeownars and �nnsbruck liome Owners Associat3qn $pu�h, Public Hearing clqsed 7;59 p.m. ACTIO[3 NEEpED� put thls item an Che next agenda. Page 1 - 1 C Page 2 - z � , . I ' ' ' ' i' R , �NC�7N�Eg7�NG ;' ' EN��I,�ERING ' ' , ' , �NC�� E ING ' ' NG NEE ING � 0 YUBLIC HEA�iING I�ETITIG, FE$AUARY 12, � 1973 PUBLI�Gg (�antinued) Publi.e He$riqg ort � Vaaetion RequesC SAV 1�72-Q7, Northwestern ge11 Telephone Company, to Vacate Norkh/5outh �lley :Ln glock 11. Hyde Patk Addition . .� PAGE 2 PAGB NUr[BERS 6 ITEM NUMBER 3 - 3,7 84Q Receiving Communication isom Northern States Power Co. Communications £rom 4yosthern States Power Co., and Northwestern Beil Telephone Ca, Objections expresaed by Mr. & Mrs, Alan Jensen, 5955 2� st.. Public Hear:[ng Clvsed 9:08 p.m. ACTION NEEDED; put thie iCem on the next agenda. Publi¢ Hearing on Sanitaxy Sewer, Water and Storm q Sewer Improvemeat Projeet dp��2 Mayor Liebl axpressa�{ cancern over possible double assessments Fublic Heasing closed 9:32 p,m, ACTTON ivEEDED: puC tk�ia item on the pexk agepda. OLD BU^�5i Consideratioa oF Award�,ng �Qntract £or W�p109 A (Tabled Fsbruary 5, 1g73) S I � �� r ' I . �� V Uy'" /� "• �ontracY awarded to ,Tesse F, Jamea Decoraking Gq., f4r $4,400.00. � ACTION NEEpgp# Nptj.fy biddes of accept�nce. Considerattoa of Resoiutipn pukhoriziag pdvertise- ment far ai,ds: Sidewaj�C &nPwplo�+ �Tabiad F�b�uar}� 5, 1973� Resolut�.oq N�4_�97� adopt�d, AGTIOIv *I��DED: PuSChas� snowplow, � � . � �,�� , • ' IC�,�Y MANAGER � ' ' ' CI� AGEg ' ' ' ' ' , 1 YUBLIC E�ARING I�STING, FEBRUARY 12,,Z473 OLD BUSIId�SS (Continued) Diacoasion Regardiag Gommunication From Minneeota Department o� M1litary Aff�irs Concerning NaCi,onel Guard Oni.Cs (Tabled Pe6ruary 5� ],973) PAGE 3 PAGE NjJ�1BERS d- ITEM NU,IBER Planning Commission to make aeco�mnendations and submit possxble locations, Adjutant Genexal to be contacted to determine amount vf land needed. ACTI�gp�D� GontapK Majox �eneral Chestez Moeglein and gather information for referral tq planning Commiss�on, NEW BUSINESS: Diseussion g�garding proposal of Fridley Volunteer Fireman's Ra11e£ Associatioa City Managez' to meet wa�th Association pn possible agreement Report back ta �ounci,l March 5, 1973, City qttorney to prepare bill for Legi,slatiye approval upon agxeement, ACTIO�DgD; Maet and n�gnt�.ate by �tA;ch 3; 1473, Receiviag pn�ual Fi.naacial Report af che FrYdley Police Penaian pesociation fqx year Ended December 31, 1872 Received. NO ACTiON NEEDED 7 - 7 A 8 - 8 P • �� • �� f Q/ V/' 9 - 9 E � C��•�. ' PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, g$$gUARY 12,��973 PAGE 4 , �'W B�SS (Conti,nued) PAGE NUMBERS & ITEM NUMBER ' Diacuawion an Housa File 295 (S.F. 365) Amending �0 - 10 Y the Public Employment Lebor Relationa Act of `C �,/� ' , 197i �o��- , z $nd ' �r ,,�;�, , Consideration of a Resolutl,on 6uggeating amendmenta r�^I to Che H.P. 295 for Preaentatlon to the Houae J,,abos. Management Rslations Coauniktee , Resolution �25-1973 adopted. � �IT1.� MANAGER ACTIO�gi Forward infpXmation ko I,egislator9, ' ' ' CQMMUNZCATIONS; ' V111age of Mounda View; y��,la�e of New BrighCOn 11 - 11 C ' V8. Metropo�itan Counc�� Q� a�, Receivsd, City Manager or City Enginear to serya as witness. ' CIT}' �fANAGER ACTION NEEDEA� Nottfy Matro Council of support, ' ' ' Hennepin Cou�ty �,�ague,pf �nioipalities; Theax 12 - 12 g Position in Regard to the MaCSopoliCan,Council Receivsd. ' CITI�,MANAG'£R PIO ACTION NEEDED � 1 ' � � ' ' - ' PUBLIC NEARING t�ETING, F�HRUARY 1�+ 1973 ' � ' ' �=I��INEERING ' ' . ' � ' � ENG NEERTNG ' _. ' , ' ' .' �'- � Mike 0'Bannon - Proposal for City to racolve Park land in 1eu of sewer assessment, Coaununioation Received, h�. 0"Bannon to submit formal proposal in writing. ACTION NEEDED: Put on next agenda. 0 Bornard Rotter, President Castle Mobile Home, Inc., - Raquest for rezon3ng from A-D to R-1, Bpuxdeaux's Spring Brook Addition Building on two lots aut�toriaed. Fuxthes deVelopmeht plan must be approved. Gompieta plan to be submitted fo� approval by Speciflcations Aepartment, ACTION NEEDED: Wprk w�.th nRw ownere, �QU�� 11:30 p.m. PAGE 4 A , 13 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - PUBLIC HEARING MEETING - FEBRUARY 12, 1973 - 7:30 P. M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL; ADOPTION OF AGENDA• PUBLIC HEARINGS• Public Hearing on Proposed Final P1at P.S. �72-p8, Osborne Plaza, by Standard Oil Company, Generally Located at 7609 University Avenue N. E. Public Hearing on Rezoning Request ZOA ��72-13 by City of Fridley; Part of Outlot H, Generally Located on the North Side of I. 694 and 800' West of the East City Limits, to be Rezoned from R-3A to C-2S and Public Hearing on a Special Use Permi�, SP. 4k72-20, by the City of Fridley; To Permit installation of an Advertising Sign in a C-25 District to be Located on Outlot H, Innsbruck North, �enerally Located on the North Side of I. 694 and 800' West of the East City Limits Page 1 - 1 C Page2-ZD PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, FEBRUARY 12,•1973 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Continued) Public Aearing on a Vacation Request SAV �k72-07, Northwestern Be11 Telephone Company, to Vacate North/South Alley in glock 11, Hyde Park Addition and Receiving Communication from Northern Siates Power Co. Public Hearing on Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improvement Project ��112 OLD BUSINESS• PAGE 2 PAGE NUMgERS & ITEM� UMNUMBgg 3-3J 4 (�`�, �ijg��L Consideration of Awarding Contract for W 4k109 A (Tabled February 5, 1973) 5 COhAIENT: The recommendation from Comstock & Davis, Inc. wi11 be �-�''��% available for handout at the meeting Monday night) �..�� Consideration of Resolution Authorizing Advertise- ment for Bids: Sidewalk Snowplow (Tabled February 5, 6- 6$ 1973) PUBLIC HEARING MEETIN6, FEBRUARY 12, 1973 �LD BUSINESS (Continuedj Discussion Regarding Communication From Minnesota Department of Military Affairs Concerning National 6uard Units (Tabled February S, 1973) NEW BUSINESS• PAGE 3 PAGE NUMBERS & � ITEM NUMBER 7 - 7 A Discussion Regarding Proposal of Fridley Volunteer Fireman's Relief Association $ - $ P /�, g , �� COMMENT: On February 9th Mr. Brunsell and I met with Mr. Aldrich and representatives of the Fire Relief Association. I requested 't �/ additional information. At this time j am not in a position to �? �� make any recommendations on this proposal. The proposal is � submitted to you for your information, and representatives of the Fire Relief Association will be present Monday evening to answer any questions you may have on itj Receiving Annual Financial Report of the Fridley Police Pension Association for Year Ended December 31, 1972 9 - 9 E PIIBLIC HEARING MEETING, FEBRUARY 12f 1973 AEi7 BUSINESS (Continued) '�� Discussion on House File 295 (S.F. 365) Amending the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971 PAGE 4 PAGE NUMBERS & ITEM NUMBER 10 - 10 Y /D - Z �a �?',�'� �.C. /(�':�-4�td� Consi.deration of a Resolution Suggesting amendments to the H.F. 295 for Presentation to the House Labor- Management Relations Committee COlIl�IENT: Copy of the H.S. 295 as presented is enclosed, as well as a statement presented by Burke Raymond representing the League of Minnesota Municipalities. A meeting was held February 9, 1473 with David Kennedy, Legislative Liaison to discuss the position of Anoka, Coon Rapids, Columbia Aeights and Fridley on this legis- lation. We plan to have a policy statement resolution available Moaday ni ht f g or Council consideration. The second hearding on the bill is scheduled before the House Committee on February 13, 1973) COMMUNICATIONS: Village of Mounds View: Village of New Brighton VS. I�Letropolitan Council et al 11 - 11 C Hennepin County League of Municipalities: Their Position in Regard to the Metropolitan Council ADJOU$P7: 12 - 12 g IJ 1 1 � , , ' ' , � I ' ' ' 1� I � ' OFFICIAL NOTICS CITY OF FRIDLSY PUBLIC HSARING BBFORE 17� CITY COUNC;L TO WHOM IT MAY COliCBHN: Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 Univereity Avenue Northeast � lionday, February 12, 1972 in the Council Chamber at 7;30 P,M, for the parpose of: Conaideration of a final Plat, P,S. #72-08, Oeborne Plaza, by Staadard pil Company represented by W: G. Housaoga, beiag all that part of tfie Northeast Quarcer of Sectioa li, iyiag NorGherly of the center line of Oeborae Aoad and East of the center line of Univereity Avenue, subject to easement for Bighway purpoaee over the West 75 feet aud the Southeascerly 33 feet thereof. Subjec[ to St. Paul (iater F►orks easement as appears of,record. All located Ln T-30, Y-24, City of Fridley, County of Molca, Ninneeota, Cecerally located at 7609 Univeraity Avenue Hartluast. � Q Anyone deairing to be heard with zeference to th� above matter may be heard at Chie time. Publiah: 3aauary 24, 1973 danuary 31. 1973 � FRANiC G. LIBSL MAYOR � 1 � ' gtandard 011 Co, r.s. ,��z-oe ' .. _ � ,:,�, ''• __�,. Fa •,,,cir q {?;`�! • i�I �AC4��.�F '/i ' 7 � I ' Y� ,.p ;KS �_„�.` 3 (.` C��'•.w y . Qc .,C � �-° �'i`° - � � � ' I ,t ' t��, �ty}t 7 . �c' � I • � - 4 . \ t .�� ' �Z�'�� l�� _�'s'r�_;_.-;'�`_; e°-� ,� 4 � �� • w Z j � SI/V�IN jM k+:'"'•�Nr�� Ip�V , .�W.-... .[YM � `i%k f � r T � �. � � A 2 A � R a � �� . _ . �.. -..Z. � ..ti r �1e.7! � vfcy � -..:qy.... �r" /P>i� :l�'C. .,�. I I s I/ ' :�• ,• . ,� �-..A.r Y -1tJ-�-? 7 e rv f �0. � rd� � � n .� _ M ne� � � � :a � a � RKa s � _.�— �— i � q b i C 9 Z —'�--- � ...•r_ � � � a .. � a � n � W ..�tslLlaL• `%1i: �P� � � s . �4ta�wN�'<^�. Jt 1 7T___.r__vE__ �+ � Ap. �. -,. X,H • ;�`%+` R� , ,.,, � ' 4' S ��i' � 1 y.vp � � rYl' � � , ' pl ` �� ` p' QO�F-�_, � �-� _p C p. � :,s-- ° �,D ,�001 T , „ s , 2 ,�p� i $ � 0 � �I i � Nr : r�;ri9.. _... A 'X - � �'� �� 1 fa_ E �. � � � ' � � � u �/ N � � n _ iY .__ � _ .�fL._. �1,1 _�_– ! L�, N � � � ti �a . , ,� . ' �._.__�—.:x._— N ._ _rx� I , �c �� q a 8 a i I _--�__,—_� rx— , ' '' � � � r r cf �c c' y3 .M � ~ � � �^ e 4 �° � r e� � � . �.----� r � � '� , „r �'�R ;a k . � ;� ; ae„� �pif9�� _�lt_._.T–_ �� vF,:.�� A � „�� ::�.;, ` t�1"J'��, r� ;e ",°:� � . � •�'14\.. .. � . C { � � � ,.w . '! . C 7 r�l f! �,f I•,- .. . . .... ..... _�_ _'. _ _ .. _.__. 1 � � , 1 11��-� �+' r n ' N „ ! � s u_ s � i, .1F , b � � � .� 1dL_� . –_ �Y .: M4 fM Htl �l Y� 'C I��. � �'•' � r.r.�: �II I�if� ��1'^:I , . M •x ef -- �,s �.� Y iJ�-i�.�!/ I Y �~..2Y� i� !t R *1 �d✓j qC .\ . :u,V . . � i� ^ '�.,� :l.Y (ss:Y O, i. O � � i ..... �.v if I'�.Y ' � f` � �� 1' � ` � s. I �� •�i. — 4-_'.-_C_�.__K Jii._1pL:: '. .- -.Iro.11.._ ..� i . I � y . �}.+ � � p ' . ¢ Q G';�i� j1 ;u .�,1 v+1 � t�:3� h� i� � �.v • "y�..� t� . � . � •,Y� �� .,.. ,, r.-� �: ��r ' „�- Y .Y...�.�..8' r �� '.;�++::.J' 1 i; ' GU. Nc H :� i�_� ='� _._ — � / ,1 � '' +�\ '�% II ;~ . F" � � � Y (pr, i u� a a,yfa�e:•.,�l�i.� h ; Nk ' - N � I � I � I . I . z F.'> i a % :Z ti' - 4L � . � i � _ ,. � :=x. �J � iif i. ' ui�r�• •Y? t ^f< \ � ,nn � ro ,b.l ,"`,�.�: - �;. .�'. �:jurr i i . G �'� � .,�1 � �� "- ♦ � � i s� .iJ •�5 ✓ � � � R �� 1 �� 58 � 3� � �,• , � `^ � ( 1,. M 2 Y' e ., � ...� . d A. / i�] / V i ; a � - i j' 1. , � �.-` / .� � . � z . .-' s _'.- _'L� � � ,'�x � .f ' �: � � a ; � � � � �. � �. ,a �� ,^ t`4 '� / j� I � J �1 �j' �,A .��' ./ i: ., k: n � ,, ; . ..�� 1! , � .� \ � :: 7�'� fN �VE. rd�: a .. p ' .'f �.Cl � )/! '_V �' .�� %�tM 4 i lu blJ� .A'"*� ,� f' �fl..�. ^ 3 l e" � t, + a � i., � � e �;; � � i � �. ��+ rr t �� . � ��', ., $� .c� ,. . ` . � ss ,:., "` ;' +' '� r �'o ��r! ~w� ry�. �-' A b + � � � �(� .. � �< 1 i �� .�y .� ��Afa � f., f' �./ e�. y _.. _ `.. , e; � ., .r ,; , � ?' + � ..:�; "', ;'. F, +f ¢ r i..�M . _,. c; � , �` ,, :�;: ,�� ` ' ,. \ • 1 y y }� !f r,e. .� J � � �� 6 Y . . ,�� .�.. `� . � , .`� ��4 � .��i'.'� I �3ti ti �S a,� � _ �' , ' , y � t'I '�' 1 1B YI.ANNING COI�Q�TLSSION I�BTING CAI.L TO ORDER: CITY OF FRIDLEY ' DECEl�ER 20, 1972 The meeting was called to osder by �hairman Erickeon at 8:05 P.M. ROLL CALL: Nembeza.Preeent: Minirh, Zeglea, Erickaon,.Schmndeke, Fitzpatrlck Kembera Absent: None Othera Presea[: Darrel Clark, Co�munity Development Administracor APPROVE PLANNING COM�IISSION MINUTES: DECFSffiER 6 1972 PAGE 1 NOTION by Schmedek�, aeconded by Zeglon, that the Plannin�g Commission mioutes of Decembor 20, 1972 be approved. Upoa a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. _AECEIVE BUILDING STANDARDS-DESIGN CONTRiDL SU8CO24fLTTEE MINUTES DECEMBER 7 1972 � �MOTION by 2eglen, seconded by Minish, that the Planning Commissio:. �ecaive the minutes of the Building Standards-Design Control me�t'_:,g of Lece�r're: 1972. Upon a voice vote� al;. voting aye, the motion carried unani�ousl�. RECEIVE BOARD OF pppEALS MLNVfES: DECEMBER 12 1972;'i, MOTIOY Cy Zeglen, se�onded by Minish,: that the Planning Com;.iissicn ^eceive the minutes of the Board of Appeals meeting of December 12, 1972. Upcn a vc_ce vote, all voting aye, the motion carried'unanimously. ORDER OF AGENDq: Chaitman Ericknon atated that receiving tha minutes ef the Placs & Subdivi- sions-Streets and Utilities Subco�ittee meeting of Decemb'ez 5, 197? wi11 be recaived as the last item on the Agenda. item d7, the Public Hearing of the propoa�d Pseliminasy Plat� p,S. �72-OS, Osborne Plaza, by Standard 011 Company vill ba taken as the ficet Item. 1. at W• �• RpusenB� sepreasnted the Standard 011 Co. L'niversity Avenue. MOTIpN by Fitzpqtr3Ck, second�d by �fipish, that the Planning Commissicn waive the reading oP the Public Hearin¢ Hotice for the pr000sed ?re:im:narv ?Zat, °•S• #`�2-Jd, Os4orne Plaza, by che Standard Cil CompG1�%• J��Jj� (j �J��rFj vote, all ��oting sye, the mqtiOA carried unanimously. 1C Plaoaiac Commission MeetinR - December 20 1972 PaKe 2 Mr. Clark explained that the request for pletting was one of the require- meats cf the building parmit for the Standard Oil Station and shopping center otherwiae the legal deacription vould be in metea aad bounds. They have eivided the propercy as it was descrlbed for the building permits. They have adcied a triangular outlor on the Easi end. They hope to buy Che property to the Nc�reh and combine ic with the balaace of the plat for access to Qsborne. They stated they would not let this piece go tax forfei[ because i[ 1s valuable for access. Actually, it would not be built oq because it is property the St. Paul Water Morks has an easement on. The plane are to put plantings on it, They are aow trying to buy it aad feel that they will be succesaful. MOTiOP by Zeglea, eecooded by Pitzpatrick, that the Plaoning Commission closa the Pub11c Hearing for tbe propoaed Preliminary Plat, P.S. �k72-OB, Osborne $laaa, By Stan<iard Oil Company, property generally located at 7609 Unlversicy Avanue N.E. Upoa a volee vote, all vpting aye, the motlon earried uaanimously. I70TIOai by Fitzpatrick, aeponded by Sctimedeke, that the Planaing Commission rnca�end to Council that they coneur wlth t6e Plats and Subdiviaion - Screets aad Utilities Subcommittea recam�endiag approval of the Proposed�Preliminary Plat, P.S. #72-08, Oaborne Plaaa, by Standard 011 Company on all that part of tha Northeast Quarte� of Sectioa 11, lying Northerly of the ceater line of Osborne Road aad East o£ the centar line of University Avenue eubject to Outlot A being included as paxt of Lot 2. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried uaanimouely. Chairman Brickeoa woader�d if Che reca�eadation should be made that the divlaioa be granted at a later date. Mr. Schmedeke thought it should be attached now. Mr. 8ousenga was info�ed that Council. would, at their meetiag oi Jaauary 8th, sat a public heariag date for the second meeting in February. 2. 3. [L co.: �by� Haclmiann pvenue -- to sezoue from C- -2 (general busineas) � Pub11c Hearing opea. R A SPECIAL USE P'. -- to construct a continue the sarvice atation. Public Hearing open, Mr. Glenn Hubbard =epreseated Unioa 011 Company. te e store and , Chairman Bricksoa esid thaG at Cheir last hearing, the Co�:�mission recommended Chat the people be notlfied ot thia meeting, and a�so a request was mdde to che C1ty for a rraffic count on Hillwind Drive to help ia determining wheth�r or noc ' this loopba�k was needed, The tequest by Uaioa Q11 Company is tc concin..a cnz use of the service station on that slte and in edditioa, [he}� :�ish pexciission to conatruct a cqavenieteue etose Soat6 of Che aeryice station. In ordrr co do Chis, it was felt aa eaoement ahould be gsanted and a loopback :ombined. � ' . �JI ' �� ' �. . , �. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: OFFICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIpLEY PUSLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Q Botice is heraby givea that CDere will be a Public Hearing ' . ot Lhe City Couneil of the Citg of Fridley ia the City Hall a[ 6431 Oniversity Avenue Northeast un Monday, Febzuary 12, 1973 ia the Couacil Chamber at 7:30 P.M, for the purpose of: ' � ' ' ' ' • t . � � , ' ' � ' Coaaideration of a zezoning requesc, (20A �72-13),' 6y the City of Fzidley to rezone that par� of Outlot H. innsbruck North, Anoica Coua�y, "finnesota . deseribed as fcllows: Cocmencing'ac the Souchwest totner of said Outlot H; �hence S 78°31'00" E, along Che southeriy line of said outloc, said bearing 3s assumed, 352.60 feet; thence S 84°13'33" g, toatiauiag aloag said sou�herly line, 100.50 feet; Chence 5 7$�31'00" E, contiaiag alcn3 said soucn- etly line, 40 feet to the accual poiac of beg:nning; theece northerly, at a rioht angie to said south- . erly line, 30 feet; Chence easterly, at a ri�nc aogle, 10 feec; chence southeriy, at a rizhc an,Le, 30 feet to the soui'aerly line of said ouciot; tnence vesterly, alon� said southerly line. co che accual poiat of begianing, iron R-3A (Aaart�.enc and Mc1�iple Dwellino Distziccs) to C-2S (Genezal Sho?pir.g Areas) lying in the South Ha1f of Section 24, Generally located on the North side ef Interstate 694, 800 feet G7est ef the Easc city limits. Aayone desiring [o be heard with refezence [o the above �tter may be heard at [his meetiag. PubSish: ,Tanuary 24, L973 Jaaua;y 31� 1973 FRANK G. LIEBL MAYOR Z " �;� i, ,. � � M� � r � <�,i? � I •�C GIQ� � lL. //� I !•. ISi R! Y . � �V . [� I} � . � • n .�„� I � r-�--:r � T � =l �_� I� " t:�:�- � � ,� � I �,. i • � EV�� N , ^� CITY OF FRSDLEY: ZOA fi72-13 � '��''�� we � j�f'~a CITY OF FRIDLEY: SP ii72-20' _ ` � -�._ ' '; N° �°,°XJ � Z . �?I '� ' L �I � �,, gezoning Co permit installacion of � � .-.- _ �� sr°y'',� ` "Welcome to Fridley" sign. �� C_ ��''� �,' i�L 1�- . ,,. • ,:_ _ •� ��----____-. , 4.. . , �i M�.si„rav� !. \ � ' - � �� i {' ',i . : � \ � �'� 50�{ � � � ` � p � � t, .= naea , � � �y . . . „ � �� - . .. . z '- i . �\ ( � ?�� I � j y +- � , 6 �•y� `` ! �^.� . i \\\ \� \\ �.� �. � �0�1 6 � \ M .�. .a � .I. ? !:. \��\ �, ,� � .,, a � : � . : �.�. ' ,. ' ; .. � f � t F •� E E C - ,a ..,. . \ . � . R iT�..—>�_,1 �� : y I , . � ��5 t � � �o �� 4 � ' nu 's � ��>.> , � ` � y ��,,. �' �'�e ..a: . `' , � `._ �''�� •I.�`i.� � • � — I' @JQ\ `Ap � y, • . �� d 97�Q _ . �4 �ry.___.. ^r`ar.. � 'i �� . A �..1. .� xr, ,M� , 4 ^ L.'n ! ey, L� .ac�r. _ v �� A � � ,� n.�^�,, r� -' ' ` i � �-: -- W R� n�, �.�1�= rya°• /. L.. .... e Z�+ { FA 0 O 4 cc • e.' ' :NF�' OCdN p�j� . `. ` . . � �—_—� V � T'(- � � o.�! � � . �J �6�ootd� �•a �'�. p". i '0,�1 � p K ; . ¢�E. i ; _._------ j L . � -`.%.�`�� S ♦� . �`L ' . �F , ;.'� .G'� = Sr i i�l^ r! i 4 r �. . �1-�� i � � G4`' Q'' I -.i•F 0''Y'' . i' , i,' i i -. (^ E � ,{.-}� PRO►OB MRY F,�• i�1` ♦ � ,• f� DlOi �YlDn ��I J % ' t �(,1 � : �, � � GRGCE CPTHOLIC � 4Q � . _ _ p s � wicH SCwoc4 I � ,�P . '� /, S ` . � ��Q�—.�--� . �46 . � ' �.c.,r \ � t{F_^r�k'_' i 4S � G_--�" .. �F`l\ �D(71,'j� � ' _ '___ . �I , S� 5� J __.--_-- Y � g��,.� � .L• wh ��sea z�J [ y; at�� acc z• i ; 4 rw .:I'.� ��1.�..,- � '� - ^ _ ,�-.^* + = �+� � L i �� ' ,.. . BTMT OfJDIi%O ""'� � . -'-..��. . CROVOSED �E115EMEN' Q��\ ...: .T ' �}�__�r �. ,r. ,: '. �� ►�OMfEO � _.. . \ E, • � - -.R(E NtMO � TO �SILVEp LAN[ R ��\ : 4p+..� s¢_ �,� w� � �to iesinMnti C �\�. ' � � .. y i.'. Pb'JY�= �7�`I� �S .i �, LOT� �110M �-I N ... \� Y` �� ... t � ' � �_3• — . l 1�y,_,r=�{�l�c . '� y ��y ♦ f !� J �� ' � �� if�� J - � . �Ii.NC i'N I __. •�� . I . 4Y _ ]. �� b d�Y4` ^` �j �'� ..' �l �� i0 � � � � J ��.A�A� � .o*� ? � (,,� � �-� `�1i , : \�� .. ��7l0 . .r'+ pS � �� .prCR� � r°'i' �'•a5 i v0'r , Id � . + .�� `[ � � tt K� , ii,��y�� r -h '! .. _ . . �? \ rSU� �� ` .�� .p�T,r+i4 ,:rB a �,j.. � �,; � r-� �"�� -� — _'--------� � I � 3�--[—i. � � I 4._5� ri n . » . . I � ..�...: �. � � �� T # �- � � � ° �, .t ` ,`�^i'i" T.;� � ¢ 4 � �'�t-'. _< � kUGiTON'S L��S!'�r��-+;.. 4��, ;� i- � �' �,\4i�� _I._ . . � � � i � . n � ._� � �.. j 4 0 � � ' � -- I sua 'g ��_�� 1°'��'� : �` T.�t=.-�i,ao x , ' > �"' -� � Y; F , i � .^ t < � � y �..M�`+a� �{ � ��.� �25 �' ?ya' . ,,, • < << �M ,i�> „R _S�-�p�?L.. T .��` , �. I , f � f ��:�i3r�„ '� . _.�r... ' - '�,.� i�.� �� I u , Planai�Q Caamiasio� Me ►+ December 20 1972 , p�� _; Mr. iCohlan said thot as far as rezoning is concerned, and che SpecLal ' Ose Pexmit, under the grandfather clauee there would be no ques[ion what ever ha had ueed previously. He ehowed a sketch of the building, where the cars would be parked, and the portion of Lota 12 and 13 that would be uaed. � ' 2 t� Xr. Zeg],ea sald that whea he drives by, he aees the same ears in the s2reets. Who ownn the�n? Mr. Ga6relcik anawered that saoue were his and some the customers. Mr. Fitzpatricjc said the Cawmission's sketches show Mr, Gabrelcik owns all of LoC 1�, but the Highway hae Caken aome part of it. , Mr. Clark said the parking stalls meeC the code as far as the setback of tt►unty feet �rom Khe atreet and a ceztaia aize aisle. If he wiehes to park cars c�oser to the bui�dings and atreet he ahould gat a variance. Mr. iCohlan said they ware practically eoadamning thac kind o£ buainess. Mr. Miqish aqked 1E they were talkiag about 39 cara or more. Unless the p�titionez comea up with s+hat he ieteada to do, it is almost impossib2e to .ict Chaicman Bricksoa said the Gommisaioa would like a proposal on how he wants Cp park the carat �n the area, I�, Gabrelcik ahould get a cop� o£ the contracc that shows ownetahip of all his laad. He felt the Hearing should be continued until that lnformatioa ia received. Ms. Minish said Chat if the cars are parked on the street (58th Avenue) why not get the ctreeC vacated? Mr. Kohlan said he did not thiak the vacation of the street should be a Pactor at this time, HOTION by Minlsh, pecqnded hy Zegle.u, th4t the Planning Commission conti�ue uatil Jaauary 24, 1973� tha Fublic Hearing of the Special Use Permit, SP f.`72-19, bY Fraak Gabrelcik to eoatinua tha existiag Use of the Used:Car Lot aud conducc aA iaeide Repair Garag� $hop to be located on Lots 6 through L0, Block 28, I.oc 16, 81ock 21, Hyde park Additloa, per City Code 45.101, 3B, D and G, and repuolish th� Notice Qt Hearing imcludiag �.ots 12 and.13� Block 2, City View Addition, and that Mr. Gabrelcik bring iq a eketch on hoa4ha waata to uae the property and 'oring evideaoe of'owuerahip of tha ptoperty. 5. 6, •-° �••�•�_•�< �� av na uzoa cuu► /L-1;7 SY CITY F FRIDLEY; Part of Oatlat�H, ganerally 1 ated on the Nar aide of I�r694 and SQO keet Wes; of the �ast City I,lmi.t Ko ye rezoned �rom R-3A (apartment and multLple dwelliags) Co C-YS (geaeral, ahopping arieas). PUBLIC HEpR NG: RE UE5T FO A SPECIAI. USE PERMIT SP e)72-20 BY CITY OF PRIT DLEy� '�q pe�nit lnatal ation of an advart}sing sien in a❑ C-2S p::stz�ct to be loeat�d on Outlot H, Innabruck NoFth, generatly located on the �ur[h al.de qt I/i694 apd 800 feet West of the �ast City G1�its. Rogex B. Radmond tepsseeakR� Vxewcon, Iac. 1 MOTION by Schmede��, aqcoqQed by Fitz�latrick that the PlaqninQ Co;^c,issi�a waive the readiag of the Pu61iF Hearing NotiFes Eor ehe 6peci;l Use Yerc:it, SP , �72-20 by the City oY Fridlsy aad the lteyqaing &eqveat, ZOA fi72-13, by che Cicy of Fsldley. Upop a vo1Ce yp�e� all voti'ag aye, the motion ca.-ried unanimously. f:l , PlannlnQ Cwmtiaeion Meetina - December 20 1972 Parte 9 � � Chalnmaa Erickaoa taid that thls was part of Che yiewcon proposal and tEq City had askad permissipa to put up the aiga at the East entrance to �iidley, The City pttorney told him that a State law zequires either cooenercial or induatrial zoning for a billboard. Mr. Clark said that oAe of Che s4�pulatlops of the agreement with Viewcon waa that [hey woul,d allow the City to install or construct a billboard or ad- ve=tisiag sign at Chis genera]. location. When the City applied for a billboard permit, 1t was diacovered that the Law required either commericial or industrial zouing, If the C�ty waaCe this billboard, we will have to rezone. The size of the piece of ground involved �s 10 x 30 square feet. The sign will be 10 fee[ by 14 feet. What Che City is askiag for is e�ething similar [o the "Welcome to Pridley" Signs on Univeraity Avenue, where the sign is "Welcome to Fridley" coming into the City aud a messa$e on the other aide fo'r those leaving the City. Mr. Redmand aaid that there has been a road constructed from Noreh Innsbruck Dr1ve to che site of [he aign. The road will be kept open and accessible st a11 times by his company, It vill be as close to the freeway as the law permi�s. There is the possibiLiCy some of the trees will have co be remo'ved for visibilic� or the sign. Viewcon wi,ll lease the West side of the sign for a period of cim�•. Mr. Schmedek� said that he haa objected to aigns of this nature for vears. In this case, aT� we juat goiag Chrough the motlons of what has been agree¢ co. Mt. Clark aa�wered that it �s in the origiaal a8reement with Viewcon [o allow the City Co conatruct an advertising siga and probably was the stipu�ation of Council. Thesp are the mOtions that have te be gone through if the adver�isin3 alga ia to be coa;tructed. He did no[ know how the Council will react. The parcel of ground to he rezoned iy only 300 square feet, This is smaller than a cammercial lot. Billboasds are �upposed [q be 500 feet from residentia� psoparty. This sign would not meet that requirement. Mz. Redmond said Naegele x�.11 build khe billboard. Viewcon has an agreement aith NaegelG to Leaae the pign wi.th the first right of refusal for subsequent yesxa. They also hava an agreemeat that Naegele vill not leaee that sign wnile they are 1a tha atea, The piacement of the sign is oa the aecond h111 West fzom 811var Lake Aoad. They were aot iq favor of removing trees because iC is costly and dotracta from the area, ' MOTION by Mlaieh, �econded by Zeglen, that the Planaing Co�ission close tha Pub11c Aearing pf tha xesonlwg sequest, �72-13, by the City of Fsidley, and the Publia Hearing £qr a Special Us@ Perniit, $P �72-20 by the City of Fxidley. UBoa a volce vote, a11 vqC�ng aye, the motioa carried uaanimously. !lOTION by Fit�patcick, aecpaded by Schmedeke, that the Planning Commission saeoae�end tp Cquaeil denial oE Che rezoning requeat ZPA li 72-13 by the city of F:i�!�. to sezoue fcom R-3A to C-2S, 300 square feet on part of Outloc H, Innsbruck Nerch, �ad Co iaclude tha fact that it t+puld be contrary ta tha eign ordinance in that t�a �tsa wvuld not he 5Q0 faet fsaq reaidenclal property, chat ic would bt cucicrary cc Che aoning oxdinance 6taClag that Che commercial area should be 20,000 sq��are feet. and that the PJ,aqning Couimisaion xecommend denial of the req_�sc For a SE•« �.,i C,: Permlt, SP IkTY-34 by City of Fridley ip lieu of the above mo_ion, Jpcn a veica vo[e, Mlniah, Sehmed4ke, FltzpatciCk voting aye, Erickaoq and Zeglen, nay, �he o�aC�,Pn C�Irsied. , � �nainK Coasf�sslon Meetin¢ - Decembez 20 1972 Pak 1�; Z il Mr, Miaieh $aid tbat approval of this type of request makes ic �ifficul: � ior the Board of Appeals in'paseing on a yariance.<<To see the City pareicipatins 1¢ Cde greaCeat yarianCe Co camg before them, makea it more iacongruous.�i � � I, �• � � ' � � , ' 1dr• Rad�oqd zeiterated Ch$t the State changed the rule in January of [his year ChaG no siga caR be ina[a11ed uniess in co�ercial or industrial zon:r;g. Whea Chey put up a slgn on thei,r own property, they go within Che law. He felt the a�ea identificatioa di noc fit that category. 7. PUBLIC HEARjNG: VACATION REQUEST: SAV �72.07. Nna'rtawtc�ruou acr r�rz-� �.m�...... all that part tioR. R, N, DokkeR repreaeated the Telephone C w�pany. alley i❑ Block ti, Hyde MOTION by Fitzpatrick, seconded by Zeglen, that che Planniag Covm�ission wsive,tha readiag of tha Public Hearing Notice for the vacation request, SAV Ik72-o;, by the Northweet¢rn Bell Telephpae Company. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, tha motioa carriad unanimously. Mr. Dokken.explaiaed the reason of the request for the a11ey vacation. fle said that it was neceseary to establish aqother central office to serve Cho Pridley area, pt tha preeent time the area is served by three diffe;ei,; Offices, namely Spzing Lake�Park, Grandville and Brooklyn Center. The growth lA theae offlces� as well as ia the Fridley area itaelf, means that they liave Co satablish a new offlce, They Cry'to put a new ceatral offlce as close as yoasible to the penter of the s�ea it servea, xheoretically, this is a perfect location fqr the new oifice, bsCween 59th ap$ 60th Street and between 2� and 3rd Streets. �h�y have aeven lots on each side of the alley. The proposed building is 120 �eet deep aad 141 feet wide. There is not rovm to put the building on one gide or the other of the alley because of se[back require-�ents. Pot this reason, they are requesting the vacatlon of the alley. Back Pri r to Cb0 tlme they acKuelly put this particular site together, [hey did see they Would have Co ask tha alley be vaca[ed in [he future. Mz. Qureshi, City Fn�iaeer. said that the baslc policy of the City was not to open any new allcys and, +.; this alley was not actually Chere to use, only as aa easement, they though� ci,ey CpYld $p ahead. � Mr• Dokken coqtlnued that Chia has not been Curned over to an archi[ec[ so it is aot a 9ite p7,aa ae auch. Their p1anAing englneers told chem how b1g the building will be and then superimposed that oa the copies you receiveti, I The ultimate building w111 be an additional 60 feet to take care of the ultic,ate Ctlephone needa iA thie area. A telephone ceatral of£ice is a long time instaliatio�� TheTe will be eix tp eight pROple employed in the building and it won'� be „sed ' by the public. They propoee to Lapdacape the parking lot. The telephone nua,per� w�ll ba changed. 'Ihey plaa to byild next summer, but it will be about 2-'1 yea:s bofpre Che numbers are chaaged. The building will be brick and face 3rd Scre�t. They had Cajked to Northern States Power Company who were wiiling cc vacat,= eha ,�I1�; 1 but asked they be givea an eaeemR�li to mainta�n thelr poles to sexve the houses 7.n the black. I Allen C. Jenaen, 5953 2� Stxeetz Mr. Jenaen is opposed to the vacaci.;t �t Che alley foT the rea;oA he did pot thiak that plac�ng thls building in ch� c::ddiE ol the block io 1u che best intereat for thp Hyds P�rk area, He was not opposed OFFICIAL NqTICE . CITY OP FRIDLEY PUSLIG HEARING SEFORE T1iE CI1Y COUNCIL TO WHpM IT MAY COTIC8RIV; Natice i• heseby glvea thae thets will be a Fub11c Hearing ot Ch� City Couacil ot the City of Fridley in the City Hail at 6431 Univessity Avenue Northeaat on Monday, February 12, 1973 la the Couu�il Chamb�r at 7t30 P.M. £or the purpore of: V�oation of an alley (Sav �72-07) by �osthvestesn Sell Telephoae Compaay, seprseented by R. W. pokken, deecribed ae follosra: All that pa;t of the North{South alley 1a $lpck 11, Hyde Park Addition, lying in the South 8$lf of Section 23, T-30, A-24� City of Fridley, County of Ano[ca, ltioceeota. Anyoao desiriag to be heard vith reference to the above awtter may be hea�d at thls cime. FRANK G. LIEBL tQ�YOR a 0 � t ?ublish: 3aauary 24, �9]3 a Jaauary 31, 1973 � _._ , iB _ j /4 + /E � . ,: , 1 � ��e .,o, -- ___ , i <� . � G� � 2, -4-- ,� Zi _'__5'__ GJ _ �t _ ' .. _ __ .._. <3 � .. _ 22 9 -- W a� o W � Z z� _ �._ _ Z .9 J2 � . .._�- - z _ � f �'.^' . 6 ".e . Y' : ' a I � �� Z i 29 "-- .. � z y . C� � _.._z�_ 4 __ N ' 26 S _ zs 6 �Q ' � ' a � � '� � �_- � ' L� —' _ _' —"_ _ i /� .2 ' iB /> - � �� /� � � id ° , , � x •+ , �r e , a $ 3 � ' B -- i $ _ .r �- , ° 60 .0 . l,"{;.',, . . �o i , , , ,3riS6 �9�:; � i ' i - i i � ' ' � I � ,! � � :.�^ __ . _. _ _. _ .. _ -� ; ,,� � � ,. _ _ _ ___ _ _ ,a __ . -�. ' '.. ... �- , , ."' . '+ /1 ____ . _ . � . lal .Q �: . ,c _.� ;. -.- . , /3_. � N.W, BELL TEL. CO3 a Ra�queat to vacate alley inABlo�k_O1, . � � ,i: HYde Park Add. _�., • ' . � �� -0, �, s r--- - ' _' ° / g . ; . , � � 9 � „ . . ♦ : : o . __.._ . _. ♦ � j , .. � � _L<7 , r .�.7 � 4 _ .�j. . � � --,E -_ s Z6 �i ' � � 2S „ 2 W • Vg � 2 � . . � _ .-�" .. . p Z ... 5 `, : - _ � � �� a . 7 W � . - - i� e, � Z •4J1 br 3c°-•. /I Z 2 O . /9 /� /9 -� F- /g � .. ' °� ' " �; .' .�f y;� � '�` !^� : V1 : ;� ;� � a�h., -- .�,.':' ... h. ` °. ;'' ,-, . 59TH ° , � AVEfJUE N.E. � ;� � : -G ��' . .�... T'. : -_ ; ; �� p • i �.' ; . e T" ' : i - �.�� ; z . ' -.. . - —.__...._ _. . . _ . T � ` � . _:-- % `' : " . �� _ 2 �_ G'n ._ . -- _ c . _�_ = p' ._ g; :vo. .. ' ,c._ � . - - CV - --- Q � 27 �(: � \ `vJ ¢ Qr '7 '4 �� .. r. v - . ` � �i . ' Ci — . . .._ _ __— _' �— 5 N -� - � � `E `' �. F 4 F :: - 4 ''� � -.i�. . . �Q ? � ^'l,, ' _.. .9/r' f.� �% . .. _ '/ _ -'.3/� H �3 .�.� �.. ; �. � ; a �l in � �! C' �; ... � , .�. .. . +U `� --�— - . � .. /9 i9 __ ,i. _-s = . �------ j ' �� - � �-;. /9 / � --- ... . .. , B _.. . . . �,;' �----_- ' ..., �.� .�. /7 - _ _ _ . ----... . . /y _ _ _ :,� � /� -- c . --.-- -�� - "7 _ _�a ♦ ♦ iv �� . e•" 58TH � ---- - r:,w< AVEtyUE . �t.E.�e � � :,. .�� - , . t . .,:... : �„ : ; , � " ° .,.,� _ --° . ,.. r , , , g - ._ � .! �, ..- . 2 ; � , d�y ? - �� — �` ^ - ` -`.,_ '� s: , � 5 �� f �, . i ' � ._s•. v . , „ , . AVi ,- - : 6 - ., � -; _ ... '!� �dl9 /4 i l _ 3 4 S � ^ Et�`� : . 1 ,� . , r�a ,, �j � � . 4 .. ' /. __ 5T TN ; �le: .�..,.�. - �. P o., � � . . .. . ,_. ... � . _ _� _ �_, � � , • ! �N � I , , $lanniaQ Co¢m�iss�on Meetina - Deaember 20 1972 PaAC 10 3� Ms. Miaiah 9eid that approval of thia type of request makes it diffic�lt , !or che $oard of Appesla in pasaing on a varlance. To see the City parcicipating ia the grRateat variaace to eome before them, makes it more lncongruous. ' ' 1 � � � �• � � , • , , Mr. Aed�qond reiterated Ghat the State changed the rule in January n� this yeax ehaG no sigu ca4 be iasralled unless in cammercial or industrial zoning. When they put up a aign oa thelc own property, they go within the law. He felt the a�ea identlfieation di not fit that oategory. %r �IC. HEARIT7(t'i VACATION REO[IEST_ R�V 379_M Nl1nT[n.mc�rvnnr nv.. m.-..>,,,,,... part of the a. W. Dokken repreeented the Telephone Compaqy, alley �.n Block 11, Hyde A10TION by PLtzpatsick, �econded by Zeglan, that the Planaiag Co�ission lraive,the readipg of the Puh�ic Hearing Noticn fos the vacation request, SAV N72-07, by the Nozthwestera Soll TelRphone Company. Uyon a voice voCe, all voting aye, tda motioa earried uaanimous�y, , Mr. Dokken.explained the reseon of the request for the alley vacation. He saLd that it was aecessary to astabliah anothe�r cencral office to serve the Fridley area. AC the preseat time the arna ie served by three diffezer,: officeay namely Spzing Lake•$ark, Grandville and Brooklyu Center. The growth ln these offices, as well as ia the Fridley area iteelf, means that they have to eskabliah a new offlee. '�hey kry to put a new central office as elose as posalble to the center o£ thp psea it servea. Iheoretically, thia is a pe:fecr location foz the new oifice, between 59th and 60th Stseet aad between 2'� .:ind 3Td Strestq, They have eeven lpta on each aide of the alley, The proposed �buildlag ie 120 #eet deep and 141 feet wide, There is not room to put the bullding oa one aide o; the pther of the alley because of set4ack require��en�s. DOT this Yeasoa� they are reque4ting the vacatioR of the alley, Back prior to the Cime khey acCually put thia particular site together, they did see they wpuld have Co ask the alley bs vacated in the �uture. Mr, qureshi, City Engineer, aald ehat the basle policy o$ ehe C1ty waa not to open any new alleys and, as Chit alley was nqt actually Shere to use, oaly as aa eaaemsnt, they thoughc they cauld go ahead. ' Ms. Dokken coatinued Chet Chie hae not been turned over to aa architecc �a ie ie noC a vite plan ae tuch, The1r planniag engiuesrs told them how big Chs buildlag w111 be and t4en euperimposed ehat on the copies you received. 1 The ulCimate building wiil bo sa edditloual 60 feet to take care of the ultimate telaphoae needa ia thia arsa, A telephone ceatral office is a long Cime installatio��. Tdere w111 be aix Co e;ghC psople employed in the building and it won'c be �sed � by She publlc. Th�y psopoea to landscape the parkiag lot. Ti�e telephone nu:nbers will bs changed. They plaa to build qext suquner, but !t will be aboue 2� years bePor� tha numbare axe cheRged. The building will be brick and face 3rd Screet. They had talked to NorkbarA SxatRa Powez CompBay who were willing co vaca;e the �i�c; ' but asksd Chey be glven aR eaeemRnt to ma�qtaia tpelr poles to serve the housea 1q the bloak, , , Allen G. Jensea, 5455 2�j SCreeta Mr. Jenaen 1a qpposed to che vacac;�n :�� ehe alley for ths reaeoa he d�d aat think tha[ plac�ng this buildin$ in �nr middi� oi the black io !.n the be�G iutereat for the Hyda Pazk area, He was not opposed i� , � ' � J '.. Planning Commissloa MaeCin� - Oecember 20 1972 _T Page il to Mr. Aokken or the telephone company's request fos a buildiag, buc he crn�2dr.'c see putting it in [he mldd],q pf Che block. It wquld be setting a precedent ior che �est �f tbe area there6y any vapant propQrcy is the adjacent azea could 'a�� oought up in a Similar fashlou. Ha thought this thing should.he developed in ch� bts[ interest to be useful to Che citizens of Fridley aad the paople living h�re Mr. L. B. $mithi 5974 3;d Street: Mr, Stnith was also opposed to ti�e , talephoae company locatla�,r, their 4uilding ia the ceater a¢d chopping ❑p tne b1oCk. Phi, did not Leave eqough zoom for anothex co�ercial building. ' ' Gea'=1d M�.Gee, 930 Midland Baqk Building� Mr. McCee said he would think, in adcicLo.i ta khe ppinCi made by [he two prq�erty owners, the resulting situatior. Wrnsld probabl� remoin stagnaat for many years. The property wi11 be tena;,t owned and tepaot ocoupied, and the propercy will be allowed to depreciate. AeFoce aliowiag the vacation af the ailay, the Planning Cowmission should take a nard look that :he building should be at one end of the block or che othe:. ' Mrs. Ai1en Jeasen, 5955 2� Street: Mzs, Jensen said that the North�ascrrc Telephone Company has &tated that in years co come, they will b'e expandin� and ' this wi11 include soAie pf Cheii neighbors, She [hought the reason she �.�.�s � eancerned aoqut [his ie ChaC they ha�e two childreu so that they caac�rt set! their�property because they do not have eaough property according tn r.he osdlnauce. The Te,ephone Company does not inte�id to buy their prcper�y, ur .�o riOk waqt to buy it for at least Cen or twenty years. 4lten they bought ;n , Fridley they had no idea this wag commercial property or even thought ��i i. beiag c wimercial praperty. Sbe continued Chat if they vacate th� altey, s��_ was going to o�ova her Pence ba��C. It would and up Chat the peapLe wno live , • iR the apartmept 6uilding behiad her would have no parking spaGe. They y:un ri.gh� against theic fence noW. ' ' ' ' , , ' , C l_J I�1r. Schmedeke apoke to P{rs, Jenaen. He said that Mr. Strand, from w;om cha bought the property, xeceived the notice. You were saying you would likr to sell your property, When I asked your Isusband he said he didn'[ have anv reasau for openiRB the al,ley. It isn't opened now. He did not objee[ to che telephone compaay or any clean opezation. He, also, wancs'co sell his prop�-ty. We caaaot farce the telephone company to buy your property ac this �ime or any othnr time. Attpther thi.ag you brought up, you would rather see people buy a large piece of psopeFty. Acqordiag to the Code, eommercial property has to be 'YO,U00 square feeCr If you eombine your home with the vacant lot, and rlie one uext to 1t, it could be sold' ae commercial. }Ie vas not telliug her am stcry, he sa1d. If they boughk lateD than Nqvember, 1972, they shouid have r.�:l their aCtosney check ior them. aoth of the property owners who spuKe [onight did not adjoin the Bell property, There is a commercial piece b��cween tF,e Bell psoperty and che�e kwo property owners. If the development scarted �:sti��.� the way he was hpplag 1C Would go in Chis block, [he parkin� would be cu �s. :Cr��t aqd Cbe building wou�d faqe 3id Streei. The owners [o the South :ar� :omzn.,rr..ai. If both af those houaea are Caken down, chere was room foz ca;imercial, Mrs. JKnaec� wae iAfoxmed the rezoping hearings were held in 1569 and the iecaqd reading o� the qrdinance on May 4, 1970. Mr. Schmedeke said chae this particular property has bern v�cant, o-..cai:;.� o� the two or thcae homea, and ao one ha�s purchased it. The zoning change was made 6Q tha� thi� wpuld be �he Fropmr rqad to $o, $4atemeata ware made tl.;t che [l I, , � Plannias Coum�ias�on Meetina - December 20 1972 Pa�,e iZ Telepho4a Ccm�pany should buy out the whole blpck. This is something that no one can do. Zf he actually made thia staGement he was in error. He continued that he knew !he Picha'c, whp live on 2� Street. He was out of town for two months whe❑ chis came before his coumittee. }Ia wan,[ed to suggest that the optfnn br in wrl�ing, Mi. DokKen said the Piciia property vas the Last property that went intc ' the site. There are two lo[� owned by Picha uader option. He did no[ kno�.� Che value of the buildings, and they would have to be wrecked. This wouid be ecoaomically unsound. They dre interested in additional propzrty aroun� cr.� , building, b,c ehay would much xather wait �n buying until soa�e time chac some qf the values oE the bu'Lldiags are lost. ' Mz, Mc6ee s�id that thaC was the answer, They were going Co oa ,��.=ra i0 ar 80 �ears, He ehought it cras withia the Planning CoQmission's power r.,t [o grant the alley yacation aad the bullding, 3D , Mr. Dokken couptared with [he seatement that a[rangely enough, s�ne of the property.ownars say this wiLl increase the value of their prope:ty. There a:e three property owaere who concur io the petitlon, • Mr. Dokken continued thqc in the 14 lots they have enough propercy co cake c.are of Fridley's telephone qeeds indefinitely, However, iC is a si.mpie cas: of a long period of tiu�e. Assuming they put the buildiug there, they chink it would be besc to pick up add�tional nroperty whea i[ trecomes availabla. Thev mlgh[ need additioual properKy for another function. For thaC reason, �;e;� have gone to Messrs, Ecker, Williams and Gabel and sald thay think some oa; they mighc be iatet'ested in buy�ng their property. They do not have any need for it at the pxesent t1me, but if and when these people ahould decide to se11, tha[ they give them a chanse, Chairman Ericksoa told the audience [hat they haye to recognize first of all Chat the block is ;oned commercial. Supposing they bought the buildings at the South end, Chey at;ll could put the building where they wanted i[. Earl Nurdvich, a c�.tizeq, aaked if Mr, Dokken would say that purchasir.g che center of the Alock would lacrea�e or decxease the value of the two apartment buildiags and Mr. Jeasen's �ome, Mr. Dokken apawered that 1t would incre�ae the value. There is some ' vacant prap�rky poorly malnt�-laed. The Telery�hone Company proaoses to put a bui,ldla$ up whlch will be �+ell landacaped �tnd well malntained. There wi11 be ao nol.ae or tr8ffic, Se coulda'c imaglae that the compauyr'would adversely 8lfect the yalue p# the preaeat 6uildings, It was not unusbai for the telephone , officq to be in a reaidential area but thia ona happena to 6e commercial. ' ' , Mr• Miniah s�i.d, iA ensver to the question 1f Che Plaaning Comr.,ission genesally Cried CQ geC the buildia�s laid out ia such a fashion thac 1t is in the be8� iaterest of the commuayity, that the quaekion wa$ really unanswerabie as yau aee dealinp, wi,th o;diaancep and City Codea. The Planniag Coemii,ssion teies tc do what s besc r"ac Fridley, Mr, Nocdvich said that 1� Ch�+ Jeqaen's take their half oi the a11cy vacatioo Chau he had no idea whexe the carp from che apartment would park, Mr, Miatsh aaswered tha� perhaps Che apa=tment owners could acquire, ._� ehi.a potnc, the addlti,opp� bapd �it� ��1� d��}!�e P�anin Commisaion Meeting,,_ December 20y 1972 Pagt t� �s. Scbmedeicg sA1d thaC the City•has made ersors through the years before tdie Co�nlasloasz was eitting oa the Planning Commissioa. The zoning maps and ordiaancee were changed Chrse tlmes. At the tisne the apartments were huilt the specificatioae we;a on a sauare footage basis. Mr. Welk happened to buy one cf the old apartmeats. If he �ere b�yiug it, he wouLd have looked to see if there was eaowgh land. Ae did buy Rext to commexcial property. What Bell Tzlephune ,is attempting to do is aat illegal, Another thing that should be looked at is thaC a numbez of people came up before Council about two months ago and closed a atreeE and now we heve a one way. Hov maay co�ercial enterprises will buy oa a one way atreet. MOTION by Miaish, aeconded by Fitzpatrick, that the Planaing Coum�ission receive Peticioa #24-1972 concurriag 1a the application of the Northwestern Bell Telephone Company Ko vacate the a11ey ia Block 11, liyde Park Addition. Upon a voice vote, all voting sye, the moti.on carrisd unanimously. Mr. 8ltzpatrick satd that Chere has benn a persoa vho questioned whac the Pla�ing Commisaion rule should be ia this inataace aad just for the record, he would like to say that ehia pLen was noC the Planaiag Cowmis§ioa's plan. The Plaaning Coamission did, at one time some yeare ago, prvpoae a plaa for chis asaa. Mr. Jensen said thaC about six weeks ago he came to a meeting. Someone ' mad• the S[ateme�t that the Planning Cou�issloa vas oppused to any type of iaduetsy, in a cq,merelal area in Fridley, buying a �hunk out of the middle plece�of prope=ty 8Rd Leaving a building stranded. ' ' � , 3E MOTION by Minlsh, seeonded by Zeglen, that Che Planning Conmission close the �ttbllc Hearing aP the vaCatioq reyueat, SAV �72-07, by Northwestern Be11 "Pelephone CampaRy. Upon d voiCe vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimousty. MOtION by Mlnlsh, aeconded by Schmedeke, that the Planning Couanission concur MiCh [he Plaks 8Rd Subdxyislone - Streeta and Utilities Subcommittee and r�cuaw�en: to Cpuncil apppoval pf the Vaeatl4n [lequest, SAV 1i72-07, Northwestern Se1i Telsphoqe Company to vacaGe a;l that part of the Nor[h/South alley in 91uck 11, Hyde Park Additlon, ChaC liea wxthin the lots to 6e occupled by the Northwestern Hell Telephone�Campsay build�ng. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the mucion ¢arried UAa41mpY91jr, ,� Mr, Mialsh aaid that tNle was a desirab�.e utilization of chese particular , , lota, It was aoC realiatia tu believe they �hould start at cne end of the bl�ck. Thi� would be a alean opsratian, eampatible With residential psoperty so close by. , L� ' � Chaitman EXlckaq4 eal,d theC 1E the paopje behind Che alley do not want �t ve�cated, aot tq vacak8 lk. Mx• Fltzpatxick asaked about vaeating tha alley behind [h.e property w71cc the NorChwestern Ball TaLsphone Company haa oQtion, but daes not pres�ntly ow1. Could �hak be kllmiaated fYOm the sequest �n xespect to partions own4d by Noxthwestnrn 9e11 Telepk�ono Company subject to acquisition oi all c':e pr:•perc: Co Ch& Sauth, Mr, ZegieR sad�d Chey lrave �ot to geC aomeone to c�c in that aree and gek a toothold. He Eelt Chp �Wj,epl{pae Fomppa�t would be doing just this. , , Planniaa Commiesioa rieetinft - December 20 1972 p,�� , 3 F Mr. Bitspnt;ick �poke to the audianen esyfag tdat they have juat seen ' tha Cammisslon p;otect tpis one ormer oa whioh Northweatern Beli Telephone 1u� aa optf,oa, but ha� s�ot Qurc�ased it yet. 'lhls arotlim on the vacation has doae ju$t that. $e thought they eould expeat the aame kind of protection ' tos thanaelvea whea the time eomes. Re wae ia total aympathy with them, but Could aot totally rsaeaure them� until that time came, ' Mr. C1ark felt that a house which vas beti+een tvo cacmercial strUCtures 11 pot aacesaarliy worth ao�hing. Mapbe the co�ercial area need parking area '`�.Y aod tha htaqe o�s 4�as goG the advaatage because 6e has vhat the puxchaser wancs. , ' ;�� ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' , ' 4 Mr. 3¢hmedeke aekqd that t6e last eentence fn the third paragraph from the boCtom of Page il be daleted. MOITOd by SGhmedeke, saeatded by Zeglen, that the•Planning Co�ission seaive Che minutes of Che Rlata 6 Subdlviaiona • 9tzeet & Utili�iea Subcoaanittee msaLing of Decemhes 5� 1972, �rith the abo�re correction, Upou a voice vote, all voting aye, the.moxion carziad uaanimously. C�REtiENSIVE PLAN; Mr, C1ark e$1d th�t Jaauary L0, 1973 would be'the pzesentation of che Comprehenei,ve Plan before the Planaing Con�iseioe. The alides will be basicall� the same aa che Gomprehensive Plan. The Public HeAriifg notice end map were belag mailed with Che City oalendar, AD,TOURNI+ICNT : CFasirman Erickeon adjourned the meeting at 11:35 P.M, RFSpsctfuLly au6mit;ad, li�ZBL 0°SRIAS�IP &BC�e�' 11�L�1� N O R T H R R N a T A T � S P Q W� R C P M P A N Y 4601 il7H /�V[NUE NoRTH ■AQpKLYN CiNTeR. MINNC$CYT'A eeaaa 0 February 9, 1973 Mr Nasim Qureshi Diroctor of Planning Ctty of Frtdley 6431 Untverslty Avanue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Rear Mr Qureshi In regards to vaeation of an olley ($av No 72-07) by Northwestem Bell Tele- phone Company, aitached you wlll find a copy of a lettar, dated Navember 3, 1972, that we se�t to Mr pokken of Northwestem Bell. At stated in the fir�t parogroph of tha letter, we dp not object to the vacation providing the City �ront us a pertnanenT easement to the north and so�th of NW Bell proporty. Sincorely � ,� C�i�dvu� � � ,.i Warren R .bhnaon Munictpal Servlees Repretanrotive North Drvl�lo� WRJ/id Enclosure 3G 1. �' �_ : 3 H '; - ._ .,,::� tVenw.b.. �, 19'r2 Mr R W Dakk«� �rw1� �11 'lil�pl� � 221 Sout� 51h ibw� 1Ni�polf�y, Min�eio 35102 D�et AA► O�kk� r dLG-Sdoa b npir ts 1!n repuiy bf► r'a+► !w Pbul Mdr,w, nsar�ltro �h. +rnaeMon oo !!,. all� ia 61oa�c i 1, Hyd� flork /lddtticn, Ciq ol hldi�y, wr do_ aot oblsee ta fl�i� wwtkn providtnp tA� eiy pronr w a PN�o�eu �ar�nt M 1M e�a�t� and rovlh of Y�ou► pro�r�y. Yht� �awaNn► u�ery a tFwt ar� a�o3r e�n• tMw lo Mtw eYr �httti a�toa+M� wtN�oW nloe�t&+0 our pr�wq halittt«. H Yer how �r q�loro hga�dk�9 Ih� abow eiait►ar, P�w� eeal�et J+At lb� MsEl+rale ef 36i-1921. Ala, wMn you on wody ro b�gtn aashveffan, ooM�aN AAr �mry 6M»on, 561-72a0. N. wtll � fa .I.aMe w�vis ro f�ow a�w b�tWtp. fino�nlp . �lla.�.�., �2 C�j'.�„� 1Natw� R Jo�wan / Munklpal Swtaw �nbtfr� NaTh Divttiw� WRV�d � � �.z �. ,Q "-- � � ��AC,O�*"' � 19�� ... .. �3��' � � 6�T��.�J,j li�L�� T�` 1 � � 0 w � y _��. r �.. '_ _ - - ��,.Qi-� ° =� �: —'.' — :..��-r ..� .� ;� — — � ,�..:. — — �' "'1�., �� L`�L "'_ �_� - --- - � ---L- �� `� '€ "i 9 isr�ermcss. �.�,�,� �OA tSl'1� '�8 �.. 'y � '-. I b . � . _�.. e� �.,.=?�+�...... �� ed�` ' �� ' �� 1 �'�o`.; 3 0 � a'% ' C - • _Sio `,�� G _. !� � � � �^ �Oy'� a � _ � ' d �`' � p y'� '' � , `�','�£ �'� ' � � . � �% \ � . s .-�C''� � .• ,..F�S i!1 >'�' —y—" � 1 -\y—' l' N �F Y,� `V R) ��N � r ��v ' � '�— —�c��,. _� � ,� � � '�C.�a � � pF j�- � '�' ,, .:.'/_ t= - � •r � r �, �.`y�, �. �_ � " i �� # • R' f� a ! s: � I � i � �n � . . r I� '� � e .�. �;�.. ��'rrr---�� 1 � '� ' ` ' r � � � `�. � �� _ � . y � �:..�t—�`, '�-. _ � N � , ; � — f'- � � ��,. , � , �''�'QO' �,�7{O� _ ��: , n _ � � `` — — �'r C� �� (d ':�. �� Crt�,.�' �:> 4t '� m � A � � c0 i — — — � _. - _.1 _ _ r r� ' _ � � p. _ � _ � � �'� � - � n ��', �' � r*4� � � � ) �_ � . aIQ� - , � , � in ., s� " ,��.. �'E`� -- - - -- - � .r` � � `� "�� ' � � � - � � € ",!° , , `� h ' � f - '�M°% t ,� . � ,� '�� ; _�� '�'�} � p„�- - �- , ��` r ''�= "' `- -,�-^ '.�,.I - ��._.--�' _ / � � R �, � 4�� C.a'� i s o - � -�' -= ".. ._. t � .'y� h � '� :�� s � i i. ��t 5'9'rN ��`r� � �� ;� f �o. ,� ,�, � ' � j ,�. 1 ! �.,.d ; ... r�i� P . Y � � l . { t ' '11 �."'� � � ` � � � `�� be� �_s�� e� � 3 4 F, ' .. K'A:�I � �f�ennnw�iu�, �j � � C.� Ct. /' � �.: r � " � ey ( � �i�t.aa�t,�� ,�, .,,,_, �, 30/ i,S � "-ti.� r ��i 1 ��' �p � � } ,r.�.4r�»T'� a^"`�.. !C k � � � � I _�'.� 4, x l �� i � � � 1�3:? � ¢� � � ry' �� :� � a �- ; , •f' ^+ � i�----y L_ ''' „ f h . `� �'� � — . v ki_� . , � E . ..�.. ..�, : � �^4��tLV ��`l � 1 liL� � j `�, �`�... . .�; �/r . . .. .�n` � {. �°.-- _ - — � lb � 7 �:� O � �. s_' � ... r w.. ew.: ,. � � #j�� , '� �`�� , _ � ;- � � � ' ,`�� '�� . �_i �� a, { �`"'""".�,c;..- , ;�-. � � ; ; ' , , , , „ , ; ; ; �: � ; ; � ;>; ° I ; ' C-2 ; � � � ; ; , � ; �i � � Q � n�.. i. � i .i � � . ��`� � i i i �' i � � � ,:�� i�a. ` i � � � . � � . �.. i ' � . . - - r� A f 1� -il p3TTFi .�L, . :`qw i [ ij�.'�v �� ..��k .'K.+ �. �. . . i ` � RJ1 4'_': 'j, .�(f,ry�j'.. � a� 77�� T . �� i 1 �. ' �y'�Y' ° �� .. ' � . � � . . . d �� ,. . i � '�e� e - H . i '�'_ ' � �2: .. � . ,yp �''2��' � � �, � t . . . 1 � .. . " ...� � . � . i . . . � . y�, . � � - � � ! � - � �+L: �; t'`�3�' , , , ; ,� ,,, ��—� �a�'e% ! I � � �r . . ��5 < ��1� `�.}� � ro' i5� h � . . � »..y � �T-p ' �9� � i._r.�.'P3Q � I . � � . �� .. . . _ . �4 � � � . � � � , �� 1 � I (O 1 1 � � ' I � , � . I �� .. - V ' ' ' l �l ,1 iy ..� � 1 � N 1 1 S� � i � I 4 1 I � ��1,� ` ; i ' ' �, = ; '� w ' �3 �� , A8° " � ; � a� ' ; � , � � � , , � W i 1 ' � I 2 F � �... � ' 1 . 1 i 1- <y(y ; i � W p � ' W� � '�1 [ � � ' . � : a � i � F ` ��`' . . . � i . � . , y .� � . ' ' . •�� i i i i � � I N i � � � i � i ' � , _ �__.��.._._.__ � . � I � � ' i �� r Y I . a ➢ � i—_- � '� ' i . l 1 i � �� ; �r,�:� ; ; ; � ; ; � � � � ; : 1 � ' � m : ; ;� ; ;}; , � � W � J � ' ' ' iQ� � � i ' i � � � i i � � i � i � ! ��' r � � � �'_""_'_'_"' i � i , . __"_'___'___""'_� � "___'________"____"""___""__� I 59TH AVENUE NE � . �-------------------- 1 , , ----------_ . , , �------------------------- � � c-2 � � -------, � , � , , PROPOSED ESS EQUIPMENT BLDG -3 J" ( � i i � w j 2 , H � W � W ; K N � i p � af � � i. � � �... ,•.,,_o• FRiDLEY MINNESOT� Ker NORTNWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO ---�-:;ooE�.'C�E ---wwe reorEnrv uxe I� SETTER LEACH 6 UNDSTROM iNC � ARCHITECTS 6 ENGINEERS COM. N0. 662.178 DRAWIkG NO. S-1 I OFFZCIAL 8U97.ICATIpN C.iTY OF fRZAi�EY (z�XxlH.i�' AI NOTICE OF XEARING ON IMPROVEMEtiT3 yROJECT kZ13 WNEREAS, tha City Counpil of the Citg of Fxidley, AnOka County, Minneaota, has doemsd it axpedient to receive evidence pertaininq to the improvements heretna$ter described. 4 N�W. THEREFORE, NOTICE I3 NERE9Y GIVEN TXAT On the 22th day of Fabrua� , 197j at 7:3Q o'clock P.M. the Citg Council wi11 meet at Che City Na11 in sa1�[ C3t,y, and wt.i1 at said time and place hear a11 parties intereatsd in satd i�provaments in whole or in yazt. The genetal natpra of the tmgroyements ia the construction (in the .landa snd streets noted belowl of the followtng improvements, to-wit: CONSTRUCTION ITEM Water ma.{ns, santtary sewor, latarals and service connections, storm sewez and a,ppartenances, ar=d temposary paving. Innsbruck North Second Addition , East Danube Raad R'est Danuhe Road ESTIMRT$D CpST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S 9� 215 , 02 THAT TH$ AREA FRQP03�D 10 RE ASSES$�F F0R SAID IMPROVEMENTS ZS n5 FOLLOF76: Fox Constructlpn Itam above -�---------- A1I of the laAd atbutt�rl9 upon �aid streets named above and a11 lands within, adjac�t and abutking thereto. AI1 of ,said land to be aasessed progortionatoly accozding to the benel�ts recatved by aueh tmprovoments. That should th� Cour�etS procoed with sa.td improvements they wilI consider eacl� aagarate improvement�, except a� hereaPter otherwise provided by the Cvuna�l a1I undar tha fpllowing authority, to-witr Minnesota statutes 1961, Chaptar 4?9 ar�d laws amendqtory thereof, and tn conformity with the Gity Charter. DATEA TXIS 2iND DAY OF JAN�(gj�� , 197�� BY ORD6R OF TKE CZ:'Y COUNC,iZ,• Fu.6.��shr �anuary 31, I47,1 Febraazy 7, IF73 MpyOR - FRANK G. LIEEL � � 1 ' t-�Aa'r::: .I' � * `_:'� a+T "::i?. -(:1' $!3> 1`J9—A PF,j.t•;TT. ;,?F F;,"'� E^?:z t rI.[�iT a0, 2 ;'r.:'37,sY, :.I:i: �;Uif� BIn G?F3;I?iG — tiB :V.eT'cY 5, 1�373 — i1:3U A.?s, ' Pt�±?�L�2B �#+< � 'O:?3�S � —� 52 ��n ,:a Z�b�:°� 5ro��:C egz �� ,Jwu,�, A:g:ar. 5�3.13 �e�'�v:. :�ad_ba,� e � �sh1�'_.L.. i.4�+iD u�Ca i.^ffi? ric��Gt.se h3T-�.,. . i'�Ail63.Ats'::�2� i'��.<°.i�.> � 7�tF%2 � ^:3E+�2i .r 3PQ2 e. a . ��A:, � . .b6'iE $��`.': � . ��. PE33i.a aa5LII35��tti $$.�1`J �..ve.�.� ...v�. � ..°v81@R' �°3ifl3L�A� S:SY��2 �i1�63 iiiJ e � �3rard, WA�c6a�3n 7/a4^>3 ��exsl �'.ata$.Att�3 r tAC� 45 E" 's t2oaztl ma_� 4. Pv i , F`.a.r.��e�sr� ��:i2'. 'n Cia Kv . �' a az§�a� ==�o 7?�J Pcr� cH ;,:iLo r 2.�fi� .. �..�.�� c;d..�up£re3�,�C�., r,i. :o S.e4�:'L '2:l��2 . . i , _ .4s;�.:r':�.�S2S.� i 7��. k' S?3.. i:�i}'i�i?'G ii?•. �L�:i:'.9. .�,C. �'�.. i,�ar��a�a.�., r:�P.:e ss�,e. ; �'>?I D3F�S:;T d SU� i' •3a7 '3 i,°t :�7�.� �� ih �Ia s� : s'=. :•`o B� ri .�� i i=�f; � � , ' �a.a�y��.�CaSaa ��, �?.:•rca ;;G., i9?3 �;��.:if:;ed ' LS�' ai^i BSD y..8 p71G<C.� T :.3yJ�� n��i�+ .rj� �.y�.�.i'.n. Y.�`�.p��-�.'�i� v .r �i,4c:�.��:; � 5 $�S'}:1..FYS . Cv�� ,. �� c�sxSs3n I�s� A�fl�c.r?;F2r L'.jg 5�3 GFa? s:'r9..�: 3?:.�� R�3ai rS�t��:_,,.�..-0� e:if �in�:;:"'" . r� Z � �i:"_i,°E � f�J ' caa�roac e nsvrs, ixc. ' conaulting tuginasrs 1446 Oowt� &oad "J" Mi�aapolie. Minnesota 55492 1 �I ' � ' � B�brasry 12� 1973 Sworable Nt�or and City Coumsil e/o ldr. liasit Qunahi. Ci[q Sngfn�s City of Ytidlsy 6431 Uniwrsity Atronna, N.E. liion�apolis, rli�oneeota 55432 8nbjact: itstsr Lprovament No. 109-A Painting o! Pileration Ylant Dio. 2 Cattl�orni �-G `�� . �� µ�..�t..._-.---- �` —� �T � Sinco s�caiving tku bids a► tb• subjace aroi.ce iase aionaay. Febrnatp 5. 1973. ' �rs haw �t �rlth tLa iw bidder� Me. Jesae F. Jasas, to diecass rhe projact. Vs twro int�rqt�d ia dstrrsing his bRCkgro�md aod asp�rioa�s and alao to ssvi�r ehs psoblw that conld ariae because of the lor bid he enbaieted. ' 14r. Jare provid�d a li�t oi ag�ncias and/or coatractors for vhos ha ha� co�pletod paineing cmtracu. 1Le wsk dow oonsist�d primrily oF re�idwtial ' ptintins �ar�ing iroa 144 tnit torahonsa caoplwmes Co raeodeled sin�la Fasily hau�s. Bach of elw thra parties contaeted statad thtt thay wira utiafiad vith Hs. Jass' �ark and vould inviss quotationr for palatiag froo his on futura pzo��u. ■ I , , � � Comssnina 1[r. Jara' lor bid. ha sdaits aot luving daw ehis apacific typ� of p�intins batora. T61� �ad�.his wti'ate of labor diffi¢ult. Ia addition, hs did uot iuw a co�plots qnotati� on the �at�riaL r�quind to co�pl�t� th� parojsct. Hs r�alls�s tLa �eo�t oi the Mork rsqnired and dwira that the aontract b� aMardod to hi� bra�d on his bid of $6.400.00. Our racooandatioa. huad on tha infos�ation w wr� abla to �athsr and our visit vith �. Jaoao� is thst thm oontract for e6e subjact pzoj�et be arard�d to Mr. Ja�ea. ' �/P�P ' Very truly pons�, 00l8 3 LIAVI3� INC. By LLtc..P//C. .R. , P. . , ` ��' AESQLUTION N0.'� A R$30LUTION TQ AAVERTISE FOR BIAS HE IT �SCILYED by tha Counci], o� the City of Fridley� as folloxa: 1. That it 1e in tha intoTeat ot the City to award bid contraats • 1cr t1u fcl]-orring itema or materials. sz�a+rAUC srrow pr,ow 2. A oopy ot tha epecitiaationa for the above described items and materialai tcgether u,ith a proposal for the method o£ piu�ohaee and the payment thereoP have been presented to the Council by the City Hnnager and the same are hereby approved and adopted aa tha plans and apecificatione, and the method o! aaquiaition and payment to be required by the City wlth reapeot to the acquiaition oi aaid items and materials. 3. Tha purchaae of aaid items and msterials as described above ehall bo efPeoted by sealed bida to be received and opened by City of Fridley on the ibth day oP Februaxy, 1973• The City Martager is directed and authorized to advertise for Lhe purchase oP said items and msterials by sealed bid proposals under notice and �ovided by .law and the Chapter of the City of Fridley, tha notice to 4e substantial]y in form as that ahown by Fkhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of bq reference, 3aid notic• ehall be published at least txice in the official nmrapaper of tha City ot Fridley. �A�� D 9Y CIT7f COUNCIL OF Tf� CITX.�F FRIDLEY Tf�B � U DAY OF �a 1973 d � ATTEST: MAYO FRANK LIEBL GITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunaell E .�i1,'�. S�CI�Ca�IQrls= � A BOMBARGI�q � ��~� AIMENSIONS: cwereU length overall width overall height frama height qround cleara�nce fardinp depth track width distanc� batween tracks waiqht FERFQRMANCE; ma�dmum slopa pe�formanoe maxamum spoad 'turninq radius ground pressure at 0" penetration s�ound pressure ae 6" peneuation ` CHASSIS: type 'SUSPENSION; tYpe '9t'v and size o{ wheels qt'y and size Qf track�belts aack belts ' type and lenpth of croas linka driye sprockets ' ' , ' , ' track adjuster �NGINE; model maximum braka horsepower type air fiker ail filzer mako af alternator capao#ty aP alternator 120" 63•7/8„ 75•3/$" 31•7/8" 12•3/4" 31•3/9" 15•3/6" SO" 5,$151bs. c11mb: 60°!0 deacont; 60°!0 slde hiU; 20°/0� 26 m.p.h. 13' 3.54 p.s,i, 2.56 p.s.i, rnotos show options. STEERING; type BRAKE: tYpe parking brake lever ope�ated friction bands on differential brake drums friction bands on differential brake drums operated by simultaneously pulling both steerinq levers retaining sectors on steering levers tpbaggan tYpe, welded, watertight front wheel on bogie apindle center and rear wheels on tandem 6, 25" full rubber tires 2, 5" wide belts per track endless rubber and fabric belts reinforced with steel wire Qnqed spring steel measuring 14-1/2" rubber and fa6ric sp�ockets, pitch dia, 16-15/16" " hYdraulic track adjuster located at rear Chrysler 251 indusuial 113 h.p. at 3,600 r.p.m. inlins "L" head 6 cylinder, 4 strokes cycle gasoline en9ine oil bath type airfilter partial flow, replaceable element Chrys�er q6 amps. L_ I ' ' ' , The manufacturer reaewes the right to change specifications without notice. 'ENGINE CQQLING SYSTEM: fan 1&", 6 blade suction fan radiator full tropical (vertical) thermostat 160° F, ' ' , ' ' ' , DIFFERENTIAL: type ratio location �. planetary controlled differential with brake drums 5.83 to 1 in front, inside chassis, under fuel tank ELECTRICAL� FUEL SY6TEM: battery 1 Prestolite battery type of feedinq Carter, downdraft ball bearing voltage 12 volts carburator capacity 70 amps capacity of fuel tank 15 imp. ga1sJ1$ U.S. gals, location inside englne FowUng, behind fuel qood grade of regular gasoline with operator's seat, on firewaA 90-44 octane TRANSMISSIpN: t5'Pe manual, aU helical3 speed synchromesh model new process gear 745 geaz ratio; lst 3.02 to 1 2nd 1,76 to 1 3rd 1.Q0 to 1 ' ' � ' ' ' �ba 45$,-, ►P�� 1�R �N f�PNApA ' ' , ' �J �_J ' ' ' l� , ' ' , �� ', k'�i �;vii`i� . d�� ,��` � sT�Te or wiHHesoT� DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS 4ffIG4 W TME ADJUTANT GlNERA4 VRTERANS fERY10E BUIIDING }TATE CAPITOL fAINT PAVI., SS10i January 29, 1973 The Honorable Frank G. Liebl Mayor of Fridley 6A31 Universlty Avenue, N. E. Fridley, Mlnnesota 55421 Dear Mayor Liebl: II In-depth atudies of population growth and population distribution patterns as they apply to Minnesqta, and particularly to the Twin City metropoli±on area, and the foreshadow o# forces at work and thetr resultant impact in land usaqe in the �netropOlitan area, makes it imperative that T`�e Depart- ment oP Milltary Affairs, State oF Minnesota, look to the future and establieh plans for tha relocation of some National Guard units from the Mlnneapolia downtown armory to the auburban communities. The reason foc this letter at thie time is to acquaint the City of Fridley, its government leedeTB and your Currept arid future planninq groups, that the Minnesota Army National Guard 1s interested in establishing National Guard units in communities clagd to, or ed)acent to, Minneapolis, and if a city is interested in a plational Guard unit, cousideration in city land use planning should be exercised nqw for the future loeation of an armory. A poliay of �ecen�rallzation �f unita has been`in effect for a number of years and has bee accpmpliehed in St. Paul. Our long range decentralization plan for Min eapplis wiil require flve (S) new locations outside of Minne- ayolis proper, with new armories being constructed in five (5) suburban communities , If tha National Guard ie to eatabllsh a unit in a community, the corr;munity mu6t want a Natipnal C3uacd unit, and it must be of sufficient size to enable recruitment af sufficlent stretlgth to man the unit, The Guard being az 311 valun:eor force wjth :nlaslon respons�b�lities ':� bo!h t�:e State and Nation, Tesult8 in a joint respan9lbility to be shared in by the Federal, State and Community qovernments, ' '1 ' ' , , ' �� ' 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' , ' , The Honorable Frank G. Liebl Tanuary 29, 1973 It i& cequested that the City Council of Fridley discuss and evaluate their desirea as ta whether or not they would be interested in establishing a Fridley Natipnal Guard unit with the time perlod 5- 10 years from now. If they desire more inform8tion on its purpose, mission, and how the Guard ie administered and manaqed, to include the construction of an armory, representatives af this office will be happy to meet with you and the City Council to discuss the subject and answer your questions. Sincerely yours, - • , , ��5 ,E�t J! Md�C;��'_ Major General, fvIinn ARNG The Adjutant General 7A Memo To: Frorn . Date ; Subjects fRIP�EY VOLUNTEER FIREMANO R��IEF A$SOCIATION ►Ilio►sr, q�NNeso7�, MINNfAP041f �1. MIIM/t�QTA Geral$ R, AaVi.s, City Manager CM 73-2-1 Robert A. Aldrich, President Relief Association February 6, 1973 Pension Pzoposal Qutlined below are the propoeals being ofFered by the Relief Assooiation with regar8 to modifying the pension plan of the Aeeoaiation. The cost figures used in these detexminatiana sre baaed on fiquree £rom an Actuarial atudy done by Georqe Stennes on the propoaals being offered. It is the intentlon af the Association to provide, in the laws governing the peneion plan of Fridley, the proviaion whereby future paid full-time firefightera may be put into the PERA Police and Fire Fund. The elements of khe proosal axe as follows: Preeent aost baeed on ]�969 Guidelines Act Lese Credite Lower retirement to age 50 (all members) 28 inaree�se sach year in escesa of 20 (lp year limit) paid men Increae� all volunteer benefl.ts 208 $36,363.00 _,2_4�.�3�_1,..7�.OQ� 1�,o4b.Vo $ 7,391.00 871.00 6 575.00 S, sl�' s i. d'� Coak of preaent and proposed $�6,883.00 The af�ect of the PERA propoeal would be to £reeze the paid partioa ot the glan at the �xistinq level and eventually phase it out leaviaq on1.ya beneilt to be maintained for tMe vplunteer segment ai the ti�e depaskment, I am aleo r�ttaching m oapy of �h� report of George Stennes �'or your uae., Thaak you fox your caasid�rat�.on. ' RDAtet , ' ' a n �. , .e ' ' ' ' ' [l , ' � � � ACLUARIES GEORGE V. STENNES, F.SA . PRANKLIN C. SMITH, AS.A. fOHN H. PLTffiE, E.SA. !M(ES W. KHMBLE, F.SA. WI{.LIAM G. NORR4TROM, F.SA. C D. SPANGLER, F.C.A.P. THOMAS F. EASON, FSA. � OALEN E. LUNDE, F.S.A. HRME FRANKOVICH, A.SA. DANIEL H. HMK, A.S.A. RICHARD A SWIF'I, F.SA. CALE D. PATRICK, AS.A. � � ioxr+ e x�sseac, �.s.n. � GEORGE V. STENNES AND"AS60CIATEB COH9IILiINO ACTUAAIE9 svs susr awnor�, ewuc amamro . mre�vocis. anwa, es�oa � na.sas.ea4� . . December 21, 197Z Mr. Robert D. Aldrich Bureau of Fire Prevention City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 554Z1 Dear Bob: - 8A I PALMERG.ROOT PPNSION ADMINIS'IRATOR RQ9ALYN BERNSfEQI CAROLYNRUCKER �A3ST.ADMINISTAA70R3 Enclosed are ten copies of the Actuarial Valuation of the Fridley Firemen's Retirement Plan as of December 31, 1971, We used the 1971 anniversary because the financial statements which ' were provided were as of that date. However, we included costs for the five new members of the Department even though they did not officially enEer until February 1, 197Z, You also mentioned that the widow who was receiving benefits had re- married in August oE 1972, and thus herbenefit ceased as of that date. Since this date is eight months away from the valuation date, we have not taken this event into account in making the valuation. On page 6 of the report, you will note that there is a reserve of $13, 139 for the Widow's Benefit under the heading of Inactive Members. The effect of her remarriage would be to eliminate this item from the reserve, but I presume that she received pay- ments for eight months for a total of about $413. Therefore, the net effect of her remarriage would be to remove about $12, 726 from the Deficit. The annual contribution for retiring $12, 726 over a period of 17 years is $938, In snmmary, then, in reviewing all cost figures, you can deduct about $938 from all total cost figures and from all cost figures relative to the Volunteers. I am also enclosing ten copies of a groap of sheets giving you cost figures on the various proposals outlined in your letter of November 15, 1972, In arranging these sheets oE cost estimates, I tried to put thezn in the order of the priorities which you gave me over the phone. These cost summaries are �, DES bIOI�TF.S � MI�VtiF:AYOI.IS � LINCOLN� I . t ' ' � � � 1 � ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ' 1 �� GEOEGE V. STENNES AND AS$OCIATE$ Mr. Robert D. Aldrich - 2 December 21, 1972 presented in the format used in the report at the bottom of page 7 in which we ha.ve a separation of the costs into the separate costs for the Professiona.l Firefighters, the Volunteers and the total costfigures. The first page shows the estimate of the costs if the minimum age is changed from age 55 to age 50 with the minimum service period being kept at 20 years. The suminary at the top of the page shows the result of making this change only for the Volunteers and retaining the minimum age of 55 for the Profesaional Firefighters. Naturally, the cost figures Eor the latter group are the same as those shown for the same group on page 7 of the report. The cost figures at the bottom of the first page show the effect of changing the minimum age for all men in the Department. In both of these sets of figures, we have used the present schedule of benefits, and the only change is in the requiremeni as to minimum age. 8a The second sheet gives the cost estimates if you introduce the escalation feature described in the last paragraph on page 1 of your letter. In order to estimate the effect of such a provision, it is necessary to make some assump- tion as to the way benefits will change after the member has retired. In pre- paring these cost estimates, we have assumed that the benefit will increase 3% each year; that is, if a member is receiving $100 per month in a given year, his benefit during the next year will be $103, during the next succeeding year $106.09, during the next year $109.27, etc. The set of cost estimates at the top of the page is based upon the assumption that the present eligibility requirement will not be changed. The set at the bottom of the page changes the minimum age to 50 for all participants, The third, fourth and fifth paragraphs of your list of changes describe some improvements in the benefits for the Volunteers. It would have taken con- siderable additiona,l work and therefore would have caused you substantial extra expense if we had followed these specifications exactly. The increase in the re- tirement benefit from $100 to $120 per month is an increase of 20°jo. A change from a$45 benefit to a$54 beneEit is Iikewise a change of 20%. Therefore, we have obtained cost estimates for an increase in each of these benefits of 20%, Since you propose an additional credit of $3. 00 for each year of service in excess of 20, the first set of figures involves a slight overstatement of cost because a 20°fo increase in this increment would mean an increment of $3.60. Likewise, an increase from the present $54 to $63 is an increase of one-sixth rather than 20°ja which means that there is also a slight overstatement of cost involved in the second and third sets of estima.tes on the third page if one were to follow your speciEications exactly. I thought you would prefer to have something close to what you have proposed rather than going to substantial additional expense to produce costs for exactly your proposal. C. � . . � .. . � . . . .. . . , ' . . . .,. . . � � . .- . . GgoxcE V. SrExx$s AND ASSOCIATES 8 C ' Mr. Robert D. Aldrich = 3 December 21, 197Z ' After I started dictating this letter, I suddenly noted that we had over- � looked the second item in your list of proposed changes. Since all the other items are duplicated and ready to be mailed, we will go ahead and send out this material, In addition, I think it might be a good idea for us to hold off ' making an estimate of the cost of this item until you have had a chance to digest the numerous items which are enclosed. After that, if you still want us to go ahead and estimate the cost of this second item, please call me and , we will do so. If you wish to discuss any of the eaclosed material, please get in touch ' with me. Sincerely yours, 1 f p�, q,et�,.klG__- ' Franklin C. Smith FCS:ml Encs. , ' ' 1 ' - ' ' ' 1 ' '' � � .1 ' ' ' ' ,' ' ' , ' ' ' ' ' 1 ' ' , ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1971 . Prepared and snbmitted by George V, Stennes and Associaies Consulting Actuariea 8D I ,' � � ' ' , ' , ' ' ' , ' ' , ' ' ' ' INTRODUCTION An actuarial valuation has been made as of December 31, 1971 for benefits provided by the City of Fridley Firemen's Relief Aasociation. The valuation covers the memberahip of the fund as ahown in the census of inembers which is included in this report. Details of the benefits provided under the plan, estimates of the asaets of the fund. and membership data were furnished by the As sociation. This report covers the following items: A. Benefits of the Plan and Full-Time Member Cotttributions. B. Asaumptions in Actuarial Valuation, C. Results of Valuation. D. Diacussion of Results. E. Census of Memberahip. F, Certification by AcEuary, -1- f 8E I ■ ' ' ' ' ' , ' , ' ' ' ' ' ' , � ' , A, BENEFITS OF PLAN AND FULL-TIME MEMBER CONTRffiUTIONS Ae of December 31, 1q71, the Plan provided the following major benefit�� and required member contributions: I, Retirement Benefit: a, Requirements for retirement: 55 years of age 20 years of service (Volunteer service of one year is equivalent to one-half year of fu11-time service for volunteer members who become full-time membere, ) b. Monthly annuity when minimum requirements are met: Full-Time: One-half of average salary of first-class firefighter during finai five years. Volunteer: $l00 per month. c. Additional monYhly annuity aftez minimum requirements are met: - Full-Time: None. Volunteer. $3.00 per year of service in excess of 20 (Maximum benefit $130.00), 2. Permanent Disability Benefit: a. Requirements (yeara of service and agej: (1) In line oE duty; None for both Eullrtime attd volunteer members, (2) Not in line of duty: l0 yeare oE service. b, Benefit: (1) In line of duty: Full-Time: 45% of career average salary oifirst-class firefighter. Volunteer: $100 per month. (2) Not in line of duty: Full-Time: 22 1/Z% of �areer average salary for first-claes fireEighter pius 2 I/4% for each year of service in excess of 30; maximum 45%. Vo2unteer: $45 plus $5.50 for each year of service in excess of 10; maximum $100. -Z- : A, B�NE$ITS 08' PLAN �►1V�= FUI�Sa..TIME MEMBER CONTAIBUTION9 iGont�awedy 3� TemDOrs;y Dlsabl,litY Senefit: Aaquisemesst; tn lino q! duty, Sea�etitc Aitnr 90 days, $7. 50 per day, maximum 3Q woake, 4. Withdra�r�l H�melit (�epet�a�tion Fsam sesvice befor� becaming e�igib�e tor sanuity�= 3, b� i. 8, Eatixo a�'nount ol lall-tima men'sber'e contributioaa ie seturned� Widow�� Seaeli� (�lonthlv AnnuitY)i s. $etoro =a#alsement of inembes; 8'u11.Ti�me; 1/4 et ce�xRas aves�ge sslary ot flrat-olass firefightes, Yoltusteesa ��}5, OQ to �54, OQ par mo�h, 8oths $1� 500 ttt�ral benefit if death ie 1n line ot duty, b. A�ter reKremern pt mcmber: Fu�1�Ti�e; 1/2 of xetlremo»t benetit being received. Volw�tees� �45.00 to �64, 04 pas month, Orphaa�e Henefit_,jMonthlv Anauitvl; 14, $e�pxa Ssti��pnlppt o! �lembps; P'�tll-T�e: 896 of the c+�soer avesage eslasy ot tiset,cl+aas ttsciightex, payable until age 18. Yoiur�ceor; �18 pe� znvath payabla unkll age 18. b. A,ftar rot�sorrseat of inember, Sas�Q. Salar�t Sa�i� for Benefits: gir�t Glae� Ftr•iigbtes; mb r ontribati�ns; S93S pa; s�noath. FuU,.T�rra. m,omacra Go�c=��, 6�0 ot Fisoc-Glaas k'iseti�l�tsa'� �alaay, .}„ � , � , , ' ' ' , ' ' �l �J ' , , �J ' ' [-1 8, A3SUMPTION� IN ACTUARJAL VALUATION l� Mostslitys United State� Lite Tablea, 1959-61 (W1►ite Malam and Whita Fattaales), These tablee wese used ior bolh active � •nd retixed membere, az�d Eor survivors, 2, Perm+►aettt Aisab111ty; 3. Tamporary Dlsability: 4. Wikhdsawal; 6, Salary Scale; 6, Retirameat Age: The ratas ot disability were adapted trom experience of the New Yozk 5tate Employaee� Retisement Systenn, gra- duated a:►d extrapolated aa requized ior this valuation. 1947-49 Hasic Morbidity Table. A rata of withdsawal of , 030 st age 20 decreaeing uniformly to xero at ago 50 with ao withdrawale after that age. Firet-Clasa Firetightere� ealariee are asaumed to incresee by 3% each year. The neeamed avarage sga at retirerr�ent for thie fund wae 57. 0, 7. Intesse't; 3°!0, compounded ;anual,�y, + , . 1 � y A It i� lelt that thaae aeat}mptiott� are sp�ropsiate ivr the� aluatioa of this iund oa a reRlietic bs�ia. -4. �� 1 1 ' , ' , ' , , ' ' 1 ' , � , ' , , C. RESULTS OF VALUATION 1, Valuation Normai Cost of Benefits Accrued Liability 2. Current DeFicit from Full FundinQ Accrued Liability Assets in Fund � Deficit 3. Annual Payment to Achieve Full FundinQ in 17 Years Annual Deposit to Retire Deficit in 17 years Total Normal Cost Total Annual Payment 4. Minimum Contribution to Prevent Increase in Deficit Iaterest on Deficit at 3% Total Normal Cost Muaimum Contribution 5, Support during 1971 � City Taxes Inaurance Premium Tax Membera' Contributions Total * Information aupplied by Fund. -5- $ 27,540 496, 751 $ 496, 751 37T, 104 $ 119,647 $ 8, 823 27, 540 $ 36, 363 $ 3, 589 27,540 $ 31,129 $ 26,371 20,952 3,322 $ 50, 645 gl , 81 � D. DiSCiTSSION OF RESULTS The valuation was made by a method known as the entry age normal cost method. Under this method, the aormal cost is determined based on the age at hire of each member. This normal cost is the annual deposit required (using the assumptions outlined in Section B above) to pay for the cost of each member's prospective benefita over the period from his date of hire to his date of setirement. The elements of norznal cosE foz this piaa are: TYpe of Benefit Service Retirement Benefit Permanent Disability Benefit Funeral Benefit Withdrawal Benefit iNidow's Benefit Orphan's Benefit Temporary Disability Benefit Total Normal CosL Normal Cost $ 17, 654 2� 614 173 69 5, q44 552 534 $ 2?, 540 When a retirement piaa is fully fuaded, the fund contains an amount equal to the accumulation (under the actuariai assuinptions made) of the normal cost for each member from his date af hire to the date of the valuation. This accu- mulation is called the accrued liability or the required reserve. The cost of the temporary disability benefit was caiculated on a one-year term basis. As recomxnended in the previous valuation, the accumulation of the normal cost for this benefit is carried as a reserve for any yeare in which benefits exceed normal coat. The elementa of accrued liability for this plan are: Type of Benefit Active Members Service Retirement Benefit Pertnaaent Disability Benefit Funeral Benefit Withdrawal Benefit Widow's Benefit Orphan�s Benefit Temporary Disability Benefit Accrued Liability Inactive Members Retirernent BeneEit Disability BeneFit Widow's Benefit Orphan's Benefit Survivors' BeneFi.t Accrued Liabi2ity Total Accrued Liability G Accrued Liability $ 2g6, 238 16�443 1� 044 1, 201 6g, 424 1, 515 1, 116 $ 386, 981 $ 59.851 19, 657 13, 139 1, 624 15, 499 $ 309, 770 $ 496, 751 �� gK � J I ' ' , ' ' , �J ' ' ' 1 ' , ' A retirement plan which is fully funded requires future contributions no larger than the sum of the normal cost of all active members to pay for the prospective benefits (if the assumptions made are realized exactly). To the extent that normal costs have not been paid in the past, a plan is not fully funded. The amount by which the plan is short of full funding is cailed the un- funded accrued liability oE the fund. In other words, the unfunded accrued liability is t�e excess of the accrued liability over the actual assets of the fund. The amount of annual contribution which would be required to pay each year's normai cost and eliminate the deficit in 17 years is the "Total Annual Payment" ehown in Section C of this report. The deficit in the fund will increase unleas at least 3% interest on the deficit is paid each year in addition to the norrnal cost. The sum of these Ywo amounts should be regarded as the minimum annual contribution to the fund in order to keep the deficit at its preseirt siae. This "Minimum Contribution" is ahown in Section C of this report, The following chart shows a separation of cost figures between the paid EireEighters and the volunteera, The allocation of the assets of the fund has been made by reasonable appraximations. The normal cost for the paid fire- fightera has been determined as a level percentage oE increasing future payroll, The annual contribution toward the deficit has been determined as a Ievel num- ber of dollars and then expreased as a percentage oE the current covered payroll of $56, 200. Accrued Liability Assets Deficit Normal Cost 1?-Year Amortization Paid $ 215, 751 124, 020 � 91.731 $ lU, 160 6,764 $ 16, 924 ' -7- Percent Vol. $ 281, 000 253, 084 � 27, 916 18.13% $ 17, 380 12. 06 2, 059 30, 19% $ 19, 439 Total $ 496, 751 379, 104 $ 119, 647 $ 27, 540 8, 823 $ 36, 363 �� ' ' , ` , ' ' ' 1 ' ' ' ' ' , ' ' ' ' E, CENSUS OF MEMBERSHIP Following is a summary of inembership as of December 31, 1q71: Status Yolunteer Members Fui2-Time Members Deferred Annuitants Service Retirements Disabled Members Widowa of Deceased Members Children of Deceased Members Benefits Paid durin� 1971 Retirement Benefits Disability Benefits Widowa and Orphans Benefits '$- Number 32 5 None 4 1 1 2 $ 1, 600 1, 062 1, 140 $ 3, 802 8t- �. ' ' ' ' , , ' ' ' ' ' � , ' ' ' ' ' F. CERTIFICATION BY ACTUARY Fridley Firemen's Relief Aseociation We hereby certify that this actuarial valuation of the above named Association was made as oE December 31, 1971, on the baeis of accepted actuarial methods and procedures. Z �, ��` . .ri,:.._G;�<,.,� l. %�_.��k � Franklin C. Smith Associate, Society of Actuaries GEORGE V, STE1ViVES & AS50CIATES -� FRIDLEY FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION PRESENT BENEFITS Age 50 and 20 Years of Service (Volunteers) Age 55 and 20 Years of Service (ProEesaional) Paid Accrued Liability $ 215, 751 Asseta I24, O20 Deficit $ 91� 731 No�mal Coat $ 10, 160 17-Year Amortization b, 764 $ 16, 924 Fercent Vol. Total � 303.885 $ 519, 636 253,084 377,104 $ 5U, 801 $ 142� 532 18,13% $ 19�094 $ 29,254 12,06 3.746 10,510 30,19% $ 22, 840 $ 39, 7b4 Age 50 and 20 Years of Service (AlI) Paid Accrued Liability $ 246, 672 Asseta 124, 020 Deficit $ 122, 65Z Norxnal Cost $ 11, 870 17-Year Amortization 9, 044 $ 20, 914 Percent Vol. Total $ 303, 885 $ 550, 557 253, 084 377, 104 $ 50, 801 $ 173, 453 21,16% $ 19,094 $ 30,9b4 16. 12 3, 746 12, 790 37.28% $ 22,840 $ 43,754 $N FRIDLEY FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSpCIATION RETIREMENT BENEFITS ESCALATED AFTER RETIItEMENT Age 55 and 20 Years of Service (AII) Paid Percent Vol, Accrued Liability Assets Deficit Normal Cost 17-Year Amortization $ 267, 803 $ 322, 704 124,020 253,084 $ 143, 783 $ 64.620 $ 12, 231 21. $0% $ 20, 896 10, b02 18, q0 5, 134 $ 22, 833 40. 70% $ 26, 030 Age 5U and 20 Years of Service (All) Paid Percent Vol. Accrued Liability Assets DeEiciE Narmal Cost 17-Year Amortiaation $ 313, 823 124, 020 $ 189, 803 $ 14, 69q 13, 996 $ Z8, 695 $ 356, 612 253, 084 $ 103, 528 2b,20% $ 23,514 24, 95 7, 634 51,15% $ 31,148 e Total $ `�90, 507 377, 104 $ 213, 4U3 $ 33, 127 15, 736 $ -48, 863 Total $ 670, 435 377, 104 $ Z93, 331 $ 38, 213 21, 630 $ 59, 843 �Q FRIDLEY FIEtEMEN'S RELIEF ASSACIATION AGE 55 AND 20 YEARS OF SERVICE (ALL) Iucrease Volunteer ReEirement Benefit 20% Accrued Liability Aasets Deficit No-rmal Cost 17-Year Amortization Paid $ 215. 751 124, 020 � 91, 731 � 3 0, 160 6. 764 $ 16, 924 Percent Vol. Total $ 307, 354 $ 523, 105 253, 084 377, 104 $ 54,270 $ 14b,001 18, 13% $ 19, 602 $ 29, 762 12. Ob 4, 002 10, 766 30. I9°jo $ 23, 604 $ 40, 5'L8 Increase Yolunteer Widows Benefit 20% Paid Percent Vol. Total Accrued Liability Ass�ts DeEicit No-rmal Cost 1T-Year Amortization � 215, 751 124, 020 a 9i, 7si � 10, 260 6, 764 � 16� 924 $ 287, 037 $ 502, 788 253. 084 377, 104 $ 33, 953 $ 125, 684 18,I3% $ 18,114 $ 28,274 12. Ob 2, 504 g, 268 30, 19°jo $ 20, 618 $ 37, 542 7ncrease Volunteer Permanent Disabitity Benefit 20% Accrued Liability As sets Deficit Normal Coat 17-Year Amorrization Paid � 215. 751 124, O20 � 91, 731 $ 10, 160 6, 764 $ 16, 924 Percent Vol. Total $ 282, 392 $ 498, 143 253,084 377,104 $ 29.308 $ 121,039 18,13% $ 17,708 $ 2?,868 12.06 2,161 8,925 30.19% $ 19,869 $ 36,793 � �a ' FRIDLEY VOWN7EER FIREMANS RELIEF ASSOCIATION �---�.�..� ' . IRIDLiY. MINNl60TK . O / ' _ �. MIlWEwPOLIL =1. MItM1[WTA 0 �' `,+i � 1 � .. . . . � . . . . . .. . . 1 Memo To: Gerald R. Davis, City Manager CM 73-2-2 ' From . Robert D. Aldrich, President, Relief Association Date . February 12, 1973 ' Subject: Pension Information ' Zn line with our discussion Friday of what is being done in the area of pensions, I have been able to gather the following attached information. ' The information collected is mainly for the North Suburhan Mutual Aid Association. You will note that most volunteers have the ' age 50 retirement as do the paid departments operating under general laws. Those in PERA of course have the age 55. 1 RDA:et , attach , 1 1 t ' ' 1 1 . , ' Department ICrystal , Coon Rapids � Columbia Heights ' St. Anthony ' Robbinsdale New Hope ' Golden Dalley ' Plymouth Brooklyn Center , Srooklyn Park , Osseo Anoka ', Elk River Fridley , South St.Paul , West St. Paul , Richfield ' St. Louis Park ' Edina ' Bloomington 1 Paid Men Benefit � PERA (Std) 65 PERA (F & P) 55 . �iE31s `o $�90 50 e"s27�6 $890.� PERA (F & P) 55 PERA (F & P) 55 PERA (F 6 P) 55 PERA (F 6 P) 55 50Y, 55 (average last 5 years) 50% 50 (escalated) 45% 50 50% 55 (escalated) 50% 55 (escalated) 50% SO (escalated) PERA (F fi P) 55 � � �- �. Volunteers Benefit A$e $ 110.00 50 (Vested @ 10 yr. $300.00 yr.) $ 8,000.00 50 (Paid men eligible) $ 40.00 month No benefits $100-120/month $120/month $600/year Lump sum vested @ 10 ,�r. $40/month $100-120/month 50 50 50 50 50 50 33% lst grade 50 Patrolman Currently $350.00/month (escalated) FRIDLEY POLICE PENSION ASS�CIATION 6431 UNIV�RSITY AVENUE N,E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 '�he Yonorable Frank G. Liebl r-a3-or� City af Frlct:ey bl,3� Uz��voreity ave. t`.;;. Fridley,.MMinnesota 55432 Dear MaSor: 0 :�'eoruai� 'T, ?3 FoxYrarded herewith :s the annual Sinancial. report oP the �'ri�e;� Fo7.ice Yet:sion Aasooiation prepared in aceordance with :.rt�cle 1X, Sectlon 6, o: the tf—�a�:s. Sww.�arized in brief ara e11 receipts and expenditures o£ the pension g:roup �,itl, inasrta oP tazwr origin and deposi.t, � � � Sincerely youra, ll�-1 �'v�"B+�'�- [ t' . �' _\-, ,1a].namar H. oleen �ecretary Fridley Folice ?er.sior. :�esoc, k F, ,.�M �b� • 1 ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT OF FRIDLEY pOLICEMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION FR IDI.EY MINNESOTA '�" COUNTY YEAR �NqED DECEMBER 31, 19 7�� , ; � u IN__STRU�TI�N� FINANCIAL RFPORT Of A85pCtATION. ThC tar�tary and treasurer of each duly incorpaated XX% police M�se wlpGbtiOn �oated in snV �+nic�pility Of any clau ihall an�ually pr¢pare and sign lointly a det�iled firwicial rqpott ot th� ptociiti0�'t rOeNpp, disbunsnxnb �nd belances of its speci�l and gerrordl iunds tor tha preading plmdar yrr �ndifp pocembw 31, �howinq fa whae purpow tM maney Iw 6sen psid and axpended �nd any othe� intormetion d+e Cpmmiplor»r mry Aquire, and, o� or Wfore June 30. }ollowing, file a copy wlth the municipslity when�in tM relfst aatacNtipn q IoaNd and two Copia wlth tM Commksioner (of Inwrence). �ha Commiaionsr �hall farwad one copy to tM CouMy Audltor af tlw CqmN wh�reln the municipNity is locaud. No Stau Ald or tax mpney� �hsll 6a psid p�r by tM municipolty tp �n rwd�tlpn yntil the roPOrt is filed with the municipdity. CERTIFICATION !Y IMDE►ENOLNT �UBLIC ACCOUNTANT OR /�l,IQ1T REPORT BY PUBLI� EXAMINER TM finsnciN npOrt thrq 6� cKdfMdTby �n ind�p��dsnt public ecoounLM who fhNl yiw hit opinion r to tM oorMltion of d�e Tuhd1 md commMt upon any �xaepHon to the rport, a in liw tlNrwf, fiN with the CommiMfonw an wdit raport phprsd by th� 9tab Publb Ezaminw. � FIIINO IN3TRUCTION�. hfpM� N1 Oulidnipllah. File on� oopv eyNh your munkiptlity. FN� two capi�t wNh tlr Commiabnw of Inwr�na. Sprti o} Mlnnsqn. Depsrtm�nt of ComrtNro�, Irourana Divisbn. 210 34b Offia �.raay, St. hul. Mimwor 65166. R�1 om oopy ta yow fxw INTERROGATORV If your /MMon Y� y�Vrldw for wW�qd ntlnn�ant OwrNb. wlrt w� tM pwew+t of pw�rion In�rNM fw thk YM►� , . CERTIFICATION BY IN�EPENDENT PUOLtC ACCOUNTANT VW ►rw �xamimd 1M �000nw�nYing Kstam�nt of naipu, dishuriem�ne �nd Fund b�lw+ow for tM lINMF Awodatbn, _ Our �z+�m{rntion ws rtrd� In �caord�ncs.wiM ymwdly axpbd �ccax�tNp �ndrd� ad accoMM�y Mkk�d�d wrfi tecb of dM �coouMinp r�cad� �nd Wdt otha w�ditinq poadurw at w� aorofd�w�d n�rY In tIM d�awrrlrr7i. In wr cPf�+ion. M» �p�nyN�y fMw�e1M uaam�nt prw�nt f�hly 1M opwaam md eo�dlHon M �M Me� iar Yw 1nn �K Orewnbw J1 � 1� In a�nlormltv w1N �MrNlv �bd �o�innMq PrNidPN� spplhd an a oomktrrt b�. � .� r :.-r^- Ilf a iw�w�W� oPlnan am+o! br 9Iw�� fsbq th� opN+ion. Nop M� adptbn which nur the quNMW a �dvMw opinf4nl �� • � ; :c: . °1 Sank & '1Y�ust Co. Savir.gs 'jwir. ;*.� Federal Ctf. H105-000971 iwi; 4it: Fec'eral Ctf. #105-000972 Ncrre Federal :avirgs Ctf. #�+5011899 Y.or.e I'ed• ��al Savings Ctf. k45011900 -.. :era: r.<,rr.�� Lcan Banks SRN41u521 B.�+O$ Fewera; Home Loan Banks SR#414522 7.10$ Fedaral Heme Loan Banks SR�{414523 7.65$ Federal tiome Loan 9anks SR#u1µ524 6.05$ Federal Home Loan Banks SR#414525 8.375$ Federal t?cme Loan Banks SRNuZ4�26 8.00$ Bond; Mack Trucks, Inc. 7 7/6$ Stock; Exxon Corp. H. B. Fu11eT Co. Garn�ner-Denver General Electric Gulf � Western Honeywell� Inc. I.T. � T. Public SBrvice New Mexico �Standard Oil-California Tampa Electric Texaco Loap-:ity of Fr�.dley � 9� S2o,�2 .�. 10,467.i0 14,951.51 19�004.77 15,E73.79 10,J00.J0 30,0OO.00 25,OCC.�:: 25,000.(,0 12,0OO.OG 10,070.00 2s,000.00 6,865.GC 5,400.00 5,665.�C 6,9'75.00 8,.��5.45 4,G88.75 9,038.93 7�9'/7.Ci' 8,262.5: 7,323.53 7�143.70 7 200.Ofi 309,S10.Gd � , SPECIAL FUND 1. BALqNCE JANUARY 1. 183,�._.,, RECEIPTS 2� Sqq imur�e pnmiVm6 tax 3. Municip�i rnntributipm hszn) •. M�mbws co�tributionf 5. Int�rNt prnb 6. Invwtrtpnr� sold 7. OtMr: Ilistl Citv Tax Settlements (5) Siate Aid - Insuranc Refund e. TOTA� RECEIPTS AND GASN BALANCE DISBURSEMENT$ s 27,226.53 S 14,841.35 4�800.00 920.00 � = 105,8�33,16_, 0. Di�Wlliq b�fle� 10, hiriaM: _--- ,--.—� It�Oind S,457.82 W�dowi �nd chiWnn (refunds ) � �y _ o� DirbMd — --- 11. Dath �nd turonl Mrrfib 12. SbN Moci�tion fNS +rM dur 13. Adminhxr�tiw ezp�n�: .SNNIM MM�M1�1 Mld dUN ' � �lry�Yi M'M� MlQlt �. � ��f �� 1�. Imiatm�np purc�y� 29 0�_,_ 14 Dpo,is Sat• Suppi�ntN Rltd�mane fu�d y----- 16. Oeho: �_ — Office SUDD1��0 Safotv Daposit Bwc --�—.�.SZ..._ 7c pichfi�ld 8ank E�'('�yst �,-_ �,i�stK fnt, Inv.e+ — 6.00 w�nt _ 63,6q1.81 �7. TOTAI DISBURSEMENTS ;_ 98.659.11 18• BALqNCE DECEMBER 31, 19 72 (GirM 8 minw Lin� �7) S 7.174,05 LOANS ANp INVESTMENTS: (Iatnla�) _ (SE� A7"I'ACHED LIST) _---- , TOTAI LOANS ANDINVESTMENTS � , (31 309,510.03 yD �■ � , 1, BALANCE JANUARY 1, 197..2..� (iENERAI FUND RECEIPTS z. ►�.�,ea. w.� 3. Intaat �wn�d �. EntMt+fem�na 6. gW of inwiam�na 6. OthN� Rewards 545 OQ• (�ctiQn�—�39.10; Sottl� Sale 511.v9; pp�tiaos S33 85• Un med Cash $44.61 7. TOTAI, RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS 8, pdminMneM �pMM (prlses B Qigts $648.51; Duo� �2Q.00) 9. MMti�pt rd aonvMtiam 10. E�p►nlnmmv (Police Picnic SS3.78) 11. ►u►Chne o} Invatnw�s 12. Olhn: ��i►� .*,vs *pd condolence� 590,00 Tlckat Px'int�no ,�44.46. Donations $100.00 13. TOTAI DISBURSEMENTS i4. BALANCE DECEMBE R 31, 19 �? I�im 7 minu I.i� 131 GERTIFICATION s 1 ��-- s 3 332 2Q �i 000.00 1.095.59 _ 78.47 � 5,631.09 = 866.51 53 76 4 000 00 90.00 1MLL 46 s �_9f6.75 = 674.84 MN M►�bY ewt�N qyt thk tfnMCNI npor4 of 1h� Wi,w� �MMd wxbtNM M� Yw �4lwnwt d 1M � rM di�Eunr nrna br � yw w�nf DK�^'br 31, 19.,, �nd of tM hN�r�aw ot sh � fi� oy-/� 7 ' _ -? 3 � � � ._ t r �; _•�„�_ -. � � ` p�, sip,.w�. oe s.a►.tw ✓ el�.tw�. d t�..s• �11 9E , , ' ' , 1 , � , ' � , n [l cjuxr7,ii, .r�y_.. Junuary 29, 1973 Raf, to Com. on Labpx-�tanagement Relations Reproduced by PNILLIPS LEGISGATIVE SERVICE 1 A bil� !ot an act 2 3 a 5 6 7 8 9 SO 11 iz 13 J, 4 �b 16 37 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2b 0 � � Ref, to S. Com:"— 1Q re�;aC1n0 to pub7,ic employ�es� 91VSr14 pub�.Sc employees and emploXers certzsin rights aad obiigationst d�etining unLair practicea� ame»ding tha public emAloyers employment labox Yelations aCt oi 1471i amending Hinaesota Statutes 1971� Sectiona 179.63, Subdivisions 6, 8, 9, and 18j 179,64r SubdiVisionS 1 end 7i 179.65� &ubdivisions 2� 5� and 61 379.66r subdivisiors 4 and 3� 179.6br by addinq a subdivision= 179�67r Subdivis�ons 7, 11, aaa l2� 179.68t 179.69, Subd1v151oYts 2� 3r and 5� 179,70, Subdivisions 1, 2r and 4� 179,73r &ubdiVisiot� 3� 199.72� Bubdivisions 6� 7r aad 91 179�72r by addxnq a tubdl,vislon� 179.73, 5ubdiVisiotl 2� 179.74� Subd1v151ons 4 and S1 179.75� 8ubdivision e� repealina Mil�nesota StatuCss 1971, Sections �79.69� aUbdiv�.siPri 7I 179,71, ;SUbdiviaion 4� 179.72, 3ubdlvis�.one lOr 'ilr and 13J 179•7�� SubdiYisions 3, 4, 'nnd 5� 179.75, Su4divisione 3,�2, �, 4, S� T� and 9. 27 8E IT'.ENACT$D 6Y TH£ LEG$SLATURE OF TAE &TATB OF MIhNESOTAt �s section i. 29 &ubdiYl.aloA b� Mlnnesota Statutes 1971� Section 179,63, is dmended to xeadi 30 Subd. 6� ��Exalµsivq repreSpA�atl,YO�' mean3 �n amp7.oyee �� orqanizati�on whl.ah has kqen desl4nated by-�tera-t�a�-58 32 �ernb-�et a majority ot those Votea cast 1n tbe ....�,...--•--� 3� approprxaCe unit 8ad 11as been ceztS�ied puzsyant to section 34 179.67. � ... ' ' 35 Se�� 2� M�.nnesqCa Statutes �971� Section 179.63, ' 36 Suha�,yisioa 8, is amended tp rsadi 37 Subd, $. ��Confidentlal employe0�' means anx empioyee ' 39 wha wo;ks-t- • a� ' 44 �-k� 7�n`khe pereaq�el otticaa ot a pubiic emA�oY�r or 5�h0 ha9 aCCe¢6 t0 ,�R�4x�1dt�Otf Oq4j9Rt tq A16@ t�y ihe pub13.0 ' � ; �. z ■ � . 1 2 empioyer in meetlnq and negotiatlnq-*-e�+ >. _ : . .. .. ,_ _ �E43-frr-�a-ei ese-eee�3-�+i3�-i►e}tt64�-�v#�r-qsa�f fe 10a ' � . _ • _ ' 3 =�-= _ =r"reQrese�a5#�es-aseeefat-ed-�fi�1t an8 who . _ . _ __ . � 4 actively participates in the meetlaq and neqotiating on . _. _.. _-•...: .,. � ; 5 behalf ot the public employer. , 6 Sec. 3. �Minnesota Statutes 1971r'SecClon 179.63., " ; 7 Subdivision 9, is amended to readt � ` • 8. Subd��9. "5upervisory employee� means any person • , . ..- _. ' 9 havin$ authority Sn the interests of the employer to hire,: : . _. , , I0 transfer�--suspend."promote, dischai4e� assiqn, reward or ' 11� dtseipline�other employees or respons3bl�Y Co direCt them or = . _ ; : - ;._. . _. _ . ' 'T 12 � adjast the2r qrievances on behnlE o! the•emplo er -er-�o ' , Y � 13 "�$===':=�j :�.:v�rne++i€-eee�►-�ae$#en�i!-ia connection wtth the 19' foreqoing-the exercise-of such authority.is not merely 15 rout2ne or`:ciericai. ia nature but requires the use of: 16 independent �udgment,.._ .. : . .::_.. �__ _.._ , , � : • _.: _ _ 17 ----Gecr --4.> Mtanesota-Statutas 197Ir SectSon 279.63� _ . _ 18 Subdivisioa 18r~3s amended to reads --- • !9'� - Subd.;18. The term "terms anA conditions of 20 employment° means the hours of employmant� the Compensation 21 tttere�or including fringe beneffts, and the employer�s � 22 personnel policits affecting the working conditions ot the, ' 23 employees. i -?sr-t�e-ease-e�-�re�easferra}-an�.�e§�ee�-.�}Re-7,erna 2a �-�r�re-roa�s-ef-etn�:e��+e��,e-rte�+�=es+-�;�e�e�r-r��re� 25 eeosromte--e�speet-e-s�ei-t�=�-�e-r+a�?ey�ns��-Qes�-�e�-,ke��, 26 edae�e-p-±-ercee�_, • _. .. _ - < - - � _}�ee�-el ; -+�e�tr.+a-�n 27 �et#r-ceecrc.!.e- .. , ��v��' -.�--�-s�-c-arr��3r6b Z8 :�e8a�-� " �tt�e-a��eYe:"e--aH3-�is-�ee�e-ei � . . . . . . . .. . . . ' . . � � � . � .. � . ' . . � . � �' � 10 L . . . . � � . � � � . . . . . �: . � . . . . . � � , . . - . .. • . � , �. . �. . .� .. ... . . . . . . � .. � . � �. � �. •��.`1��'4��i�j� . .. . � .. � � . ... ' � 2 Sec. 5. Minnesota Statutes 1971� Sectton 179,64� . �,. 3 3ubdivision 1� is ameaded to read: • i ; g '179.64 [STRIXES= PROHTBITIONt PENALTIES,1 Subdivision 5 1. No person holdinq a position by appointment or , 6:� edrployment'in the government oE the state of Minnesota, or _ 7 in the government oi any one or more of the politicai ,-_ B anbdi�visions.thereof, or in the serVice oE the pubiic , _ 9 schoo'ls� or of the state aniversity� or lA the BerYiCe of �+ l0 anyauthortty, commission or board�or any other branch of � ti the public servi,cer whether included or eXCepted trom this 12 act may enqaQe in a strike, nor shall any such person or ' 13. organization of such yezsons or Ste oificials or aqents ' ' 14 cause� condone, instigate, encourage, or cooparate� in a i5 strike exc'ept as may be provided in subdivision 7. ' 15 Sec. 6. blinnesota Statutes 1971, 5ection 179.64� 17 Subdivision 7, is amended to readi I19 Subd..7. ^3crr A vlolation of section 179.68, 19 subdivfsion 2, clause (9), a refnsal by the empioyer to ' 20 request bindin5 arbit.ation when requesCed bY the exclusive ' 21 representativa pursuant to section 179.69, subdivSston 3 or 22 5, or exhaustion ai nediation services under sectlon 174,71r ' '23 subdiVision 5, clause (a), and an Impasse is reached, is a � _..__._..�...— _�..� ' 24 defense to a violatioa of thls section, eYCeqt as to 25 essential enployeesa As to all aublic empkoyees, no otner ' 26 Unfair labor practica or vtolation o� this act by—ee�pa � •-_.--._....,_._.� ..__, , 27 public employer--:.-$—°er—a—ele�e�-�e shall be a vlolation of 28 this section but may be considered by the court in 1 2 3 4 5 i 6 � � : . 8 , . 9 , 10 tl ' � 12 � 13 f, , 14 ' � 15 ' I6 ' ' 17 , ,• 18 is ' ao 21 , 22 ' 23 24 , 25 ' a6 z� , 28 �C mitiqation of or retraction of aay penalties as to employees and employee oTqanizatioas. Sec. 7. Minnesota Statutes i971� Section 179.b5� SubdiVision 2, is amended to readi Subd. 2. Puhlic employees shall have the right to Eorm and joia.labor or empioyee orqani2ations, and shall have the right not to form.aad join such orQanizations. Public employees in an appropriate unit shall have the right by : secret bal,lot to desiqnate an exclnsSve representative for: the purpose of negotlatinq qrievance procedures and the . tetms;and conditioas of employment for such employees,with� the employer oP such unit. Except for employees included in section 179.63,�subdivisioa 30, c2ause (e), alt pubiic employees who are not members of the eXClusive Tepresentative may be required by said representatiYe to _._..« contribute a fair share fea for services rendered hy the exclusive representative, and Yhe empioyer upon not�fication by the exclusive representattve of.such emp2oyees shall be obligated to check ofi said fee fiom the earninqs of the employee and transmit the ssme to the exclusive ; YepPesentative. .�.._. .._._.. ; ,Sec. 9. MinnesoLa Statutes 1971r Section 179.65, Subdivislon 5� is amended to readf; Subd., 5. Public empioyees shall have the right to request and be allowed dues check otP #or the-��e;�eb �@i4�f�'8m.°�'orr-o-�r-ti`.-i�3�:�--ekr?-et�E_ . —c;;°�x�—Atit�9—t�k$c'+'� - . �o�$—sa��-e��-�-,.�----��,�, _ a+�: fc�--t�,a�-.�►as :�o$4—�s—f��--�e—a�ee—e�aek . � s � 10D , � i off-P�n r�a�an�-te _,. _•, •_.. �,�",�,�4-�0-}�4�3'5 e x c 1 u s i v e . .��.. � 2 repTesentative. In the absence of at1 exclusiVe _ � 3 repiesentative, public emP�oyees shall have the right to � � 4 request and be allowed dues check o£f for the organization r.�.. 5 of their choice . • �, fi �Sec. 9.. Minnesota Statutes 1971♦ Section 179.65, ; 7 Subdivision 6� Ss amended to readl' � � 8 Subd. b. Supervisory and confidential employees� �9' princiPals_ and assistanC principals-r-+'�aq-#ei-�-cx�d . "1. . 1� pa��---_--- -.. _....-'reYee-e�a�►3-ea�asra-a�rd taay form their own � 11 organizations--r-pre��e�es�r-��e�--se�=: a :- _3r�s � 12 ��-l�--�+-°;` :�-_�e�e�-s�tgrr�ssr�-e:�-ce�,i-3-�e�a�-ea�e�tesr-e,r 13 lr�rrerperl�-essc�-aE�r±-r�fats�-3�:'�nei�e�sr-�-��e3�ed-��e-as+ ' 14 ag�s�a�rfete-tsrs�t-r—��k,_`��;--�r-$-�t�e�ser+1-e�r ' . ' ' ' , ' 1 , 15 16 . 1� 18 19 __: =:.:__.-._�_.. etR�e7ee-e�-�r�+'e'�er�-e�$�--�+�� es4aer�zn�ess-+ri{+�-sr�eit-�e�-e��+�= -�tc��ri-a�-�3 ei�r-i►ss-� Z"LTiR'tii1P'iT'��i�T1�fl_..J � ��vj�i-ii'�'��iTVT:zZ�CSCiY'LTR2' Q7Rf��a'!d�97"'tr!-lrCS't"� - �89Sj-$$t3t!='a�;.' �*'ff!°^f-$&%£r�f'fr pe:�r,�e�d •. An emp],oyer sh�ll-rte�r$"�' "�'-�=°±+�=—tee 20 �:�ec�e:�-Ee extend.exalusive recogniYiait ta 21 a repseseatative oE or an or4anlzation of supervisory or 22 confi.denti.al employeeS, or prinCiDals aad assSsCant 23 aa as principals,� for the purpose of neqotiating terms or conditioAS, of enpioymeat,-ire:�-*s:�-ee�s�-�a;+-��tt�rr--ae;�d �� _ �> . _ �-�-�� 26 eri�p��e-rrta-��e�ro Sn accordance with a11 nthex provisions _...�...�..e..�«...... 27 oE this act`, ..........-�., 28 Sec. 10. Minnesota 5tatutes 1971, ��ction 179.65, � � � ; � i ' • 2 � 3 � � 4 � S � 6 � 7 � $ � 9 10 ' 11 ;' E2 13 raa 1Q E . Subdivision 8� !s am@aded to resds�' Subd. 4. A pubiic employer has the obliqation to meet and =_..__= neqotiate in good faith with the exclusive representaCive of the supervisory employees, confidenttal ...—• employees,• principals and assistant principals,—�e�r—�G�rc-fr ��*-::�tfrae reqardin9 grievance procedures and the terms and conditions of theit employment , but such obliqation does not compel the public employer or its representative to a4ree to a proposal or require the making of a concession . ,Sec.:11. Minnesota Statutes 1971, Section 179.66, ; Subdiviaion 5� is ameaded to�read= ; ;Subd; 5. Any Drovision ot any contract required by section 179.70, which of itseli or ia its lmplementation wou14 be in violation of or in coaflict with any statute of 15 the state:oi Mlnnesota or ruie or reguiation pronulqated ' 16. Chereunder, or provision of a municiFai home ruie charter or , , � ' ' , ' 17 OrdinariCe,oT xeSOlUtiori adopted pursuant thereto� o� iule oE 36 any state�board or agency 4overnincl licensure or 19 reqlstTation of an e�pioyee, provlded such statute, rule, 20 regulation, home rule charter, ordinance, or resolution is � 21 not in contlict with sections 199.61 to 179,6fi shall be Vold 22 and of no,effect. . � 23 24 Sec. 12, Minnesota Statutes 5971, Saction 179.66r is amended by adding a s�bdivision to readt 25 Subd. 10. A puh?ic employer must afford ti�e ofE with 26 pay to elected oEfice:s or appolnted representatives of the 27 excln�iVe representativs for the pnrposas of conducting the N�...s�.... 28 dutles of the exclusiVa regresentative and mustr upon ----�—.... � � 1 1 request, provide for leaves of absence to elected or 2 appointed afficials of the exclusive representative. 3 Sec. 13. Minnesota Statutes 1971� Section 179.67, 4 Subdivision`7i is amended to reads - 5 Subd. 7, kn employee orqanizatioa shall be eertifSed 6` as the exclusive iepresentative of:an appropriate unit upon � ,.�- - ; ?�receiviAq a majority of those votes=-�—�,-��ey-e�s cast _ ...__. 8!n the approDriate unit at a certiiication electioa. '; 9 • Sec,'�4,�-Minnesota Statutes l971r Section 179.67i � � � • ' 10 Subdivlsion llr is amended to readt -- •-: : -� il �ubd.:ll. I� no cholce on the ballot receiVes a- ,,; 12 majority oE those—�=�Jees votes�cast in the unit, the •-----..�..�.. 13 director shall conduct a run ofi election wherein the ballot ' 14 shal2.eontain only Che-two ehaices;recaivinq the gxeater ' �5 number of Yotes. • - _ 16 Sec, i5. Minnesota statutes 1971� Section 179.67r 1T 3 bd � ' a SvJ.sion 12� is amended to read! � , � , ' ' ' � 16 Subd.;12.- Upon a Tepresentative candidate receiving u 19 majority o� those votes—o-f—ei}—er��-ke�+�e�s cast in a unit, 20 the dizector shall certify that repr0sentative eandidate as 21 .the exclusive reDresentative of a7,1 e�ployees in the unit, 22 SeC. I6. Minnesota StatUtas 1971� seCtton 179,b8, is. 23 ameaded to:reads - 2g �79.66 tUNFAIR PRACTICES.) SubdiViSion 1. The 25 practices specified Sn thts seetion are UnEair practices, 26 Any employee, emgioyerr enployee or enp�,oyer orgaaizatlon. 27 exclusl,ve•rep:esentative, or any o�har person or ' 2S or9anizat±on_a5grieved by an unteir labor praCY�ce � lOF l i� ;, 1 1� I� 0 � 0 ��detined in acetioas 179�b1 to 174.77.maY brin9 an actipn in 2 dlatt4ct aourt ot the coynty wherei� tha practias is alleged 3 to hava occurrBd tor �,n�pnctive xeixet and Por damages 4 c+�uee�d bY such uniair labor practics, •-�+r��a�k�raa�,�Few—br S e—t+�bi�e--etntrke��—�ie4c�l►ae--be--�t�+iretw�E+�#—s$iri-kihr 6 ¢ubd,; �. aubilc empioyers, thel,r a0ente or 7 •=epreaentak�vae are Drahibitod lromt � . 8 �1) 7�nCerierinQr rostraininQ or ooercino emplcyees in 9 the axercis� q! the riphte quaran�es4 in seetione 1�9,61 to l0 �379.77� il (2� d.omSnaClnC or intezteriaq with tha lormation� �1 exSsterCa �r admin�iatretion.ot �nY etnDloYae orsranization or , . �,,.,� 13 contr�buti�p other aapport to it i . �. 14 �3) discrimiaatinp 4n reqard to hiro or teaure to ; , 15 encoura4e �Ox discou=aQa memberehiP_�n an�employee 16 orqen�,zati,on� , �7 (4) dtaChaxQinq or otherWise discrl�minatinp aqainst an , � � l9 etaployea beaau�e•he has siqaed or ii7�ad en attiaavltr � 19 peCitioa o,r aompielnt or pivea any l,ntorm�tion or testimony 20 .vnder aect�ona 379.b1 to 179.77t 2�, (5� re�ui�A� t0 In9et anQ neQ.otiate !,n OoOd Paith with. '22 the exc7,u6ive representative o! its employeee Sp an : i 2d apDropriate qnf�� 24 (6� Feluaipq to Comply w],th Q�lavaROe procedures 2S 26 �ont�alaeci ip an a�xeem&nt as reaui;ed by seation 179.7ar (7) diSC;�but�nq ar cixculatip4 any blacklSst pP , �7 �nd�Viduals'o%4icisinp ariy legal Y14rit or of inembers ot a �6 �.abor or�tanizatxon'to; Che puzQoss p! �?�QVei�kxf�q'�11d�V,�dpq�� • a lOG I1 . z 0 ea blackllsted lram obtain;nQ or retainittq employmenti (8j Violating any oi the ruies and requlationa 3 e�tabliahad by the c�irec�or re9ulaC�nq the conduct of 4 zayzasentation tiectiona qr 6 6 7 8 9 t9� xatuaiefq to comply with tha provialoas oP a valid decision q!� a b�nd�,np arbi.t=ation panal or arbibraLOr ..._.,........ .actin0 pusauanC t0 eecti0ns 179.61 to 179.77-t-1►�e�}daeM �'r-s'e'hM►�en-vi-�,ur+-a�#es►eb�re�dos��-k+r-�-efr-e�►i�eYer a , ai�� e-eh � 0 � titsfati�-iebOi�-pra�a�b#ee � � �1 L iz i� �� 3� i' I •� ;' 16 : �7 t' �g � �' i '' ' , ' t10) y�,oldtiag or rePUSin¢ to compiy w;th any �aw�ul 0lyder. d�. dec�sioA Sbdued b�' Lhe dire�toY br th� boerd-T-� � , � .� . ili telu51p0.t0 plpV�de upoR the lequest of the+ ekcluliVe.representative ali inlormatl�on Gertel,ninff to the yi�� pub�id emp�oyer�e budpet bpCh preseht and proposed� r+�venues ..,.__.,...., apd athex �inanclriB i�1EO�'mation. Subd.i3,_ Empioyee organizatiqns� their aqents or �xaAreaantatives, an0 publia s�ployees are prohibited fromi 1,8 41,� seetraininp os �oercinp amployeea ia the exercise 20 ot.th�tx x{qhta as pxovxdad Sn seak�otsa 179.61 to 179,77� a� (2� rR�tralnin9 or a9erCizlq e,pubilc amployer iti the 22 eiactl,on O,t hia reprasentativea to bo Qmployed �or the � d3 pllrppses 0� meatir,p and qE��otl8tiriq or the ddjustment o� 2� qr�evancaaj 2� (3) reiusins to mee� ana ne�otiake in gooa �aith wtth�a 2S Au�liq emA7,oXeTr �# they have been �eaS,qnated 1a accoraance a7 w��h the proY�bions o� a�rtions 379�6� to �79.77 as the , 28 exclu$1ve rePtesdntatlVe o� emaloye�x ln an approprlatP lOH � .�� _ � � 1 unit� .� � ' 2 Cg) violating any of the ru2es and requlations - , 3 establtshed by the director regulatinq the conduct oE ' k representation eiections� ' S t5) retusing to complY with the provisions of a valid 6 decision of an arbitration panel or arbitrator actinq ' 7 Dursuant t,o sections 179.61 to 179;77) : 8 G6) calling, institutin4, maintaining or conductin4 a , 9 strike or boycotC against any public enpioyer on account of I ' • ti .. ' 10 any jurisdictlonal coatroversy� _ . ii (7) coercin9 or restraiaing any person with the eEfect ' � 12 to! � ; . � ! 13 -�a) lorce or iequire any publlc employer to cease" ' • 14 deaii�g or�doing business w�th anY other person or= ' ,15 �b) fozce or require a public:employer to recognize io,r 16 representation gurposes an employEp organiaation not ' 17 certified by the directort ' 18 (c) refuse'to haadle qoods or parPorm servleea� 19 td) p�eventing,an empioyee from pravidinq services to , 20 .the employgr? , ' 21 �B) commltting any act dasigned to damage or actuallx ' 22 damag�nq physical property or.endanqe:ing the sa��ty of ' 23 8ersons while engaginq im a strike� ' 24 (9) forcinq or requiTing any employer ta assign ' 2S particu2ar;work to employees in a particular employee 26 organS.zation or Sn a partirul�r trade, craft, or riass ' a7 rather thari't0 employaes in another enPloyes oYgaaization or 2II in anoCher trade, crait or classr .1 i'� 'I � +' � i, i i ; i'. r 1 �.f�♦ j � �... a \v � �. (10) causin4 or attempting to cause a public employer 2 to pey or deliver or agree to pay or delivei.any money or � 3 other thing o� va2ue, in the nature.of an exaction,,for !' 4 services.which are not performed ox not to be performed� ,' S L21) engaging in-a an unlawful sLrlkeJ. 6 i l-2)_ ' .-. '' _`:= =�ls.Fi--wh#i�3s-�a� ` ' --- .. _ <..�}„f'��Y : ,: r 7 �ereo�-to-<tei-��er-�eaet�s-o�-t�e�er�n=�e�r�ec$� 8 .= , �i�-l-�si�C3te�s'eg--rt#�ek- eas-at�-t��at+��se-�eak-aeT ' � - --- _ ' y �'�"n9�"�tti�i�e�-t�e�--�� _ r..,. =#tet+�# 10 . {�} �icketing which unreasonably interieres with the ' � . �,. . .., i li Sn4ress.and eqress to facilSties_ot the_public emqloyer� , 12 � ` -�5i (13) seizing or occvDYinq or destroyin4 Pro.p2rty ; � � 13 at th� emp}oyer= _ � •. 14 �E3�6} (14) violating or refusing to com�ly w3tis any -; -•-_-� . ' i5 lawful ordzr or declsion issued by:the dlrectar of the bo�rd 16 as.authorized by sections.179�61•ta 179.77--* . -.—.. 1 T � {-}-7}-?ri'ie-�.e3*af� ��tst*�r��e n+� 18 s�eas�y-eite�tre3e�}-es--r,e�a#�a�3e-�rirde�-eae��-�}3r53a 19 �-}-9r- . . 20 Sec. 17. Minnesota statutes 1971, SactSon 179,b9, 21 Subdivisio�n 2� i.s amended to read�. , 22 Subd�i2� Ali negotiations, nediation sessians, and ; 23 heari�gs bgtween public em�loyars and pubZic enpl�yees or 2A thetr1respective representatives shall be-�a�e ptSvate , 25 meetings excepL whenrog?sts•�e�-�,re�e}e-6-,yy-�isa-��o�� 25 lnutnally agreed by the parties . 27 Sec. �,e. r:innasota ststutes 1971, Saction 179,59, _ 28 5ubdivision 3. is emended :o r2ad ; , - 1 Subd. 3, The dfrector shali certlfy a matter to the 2 board whet3 either or both parties petitiotl for arbitration 3 statinSl that an impasse has been reached and the director ' 4 has Cetermined`that fnrther mediatioa eftorts under 6 subdivision 1 would serve no purpose.. Upon buch ' 6 certification, the parties shall each submlt their 7 respective finai posftlons on matters.not aqreed upon , and • ' B eXCept Eor�essential employees shall eaCh indicate if�they� � � � ' 9 sequest binding arbitration � The parties may stipalate to � 10 Yhe board those agreed ugon items to be exclud2d Esom ' � � . _ ii arbitration. � , ' 12 Sec. 19. Minnesota 5tatutes:1971, 5ectien 179.69� - 13 Subdtyision 5i is amended to readi ; _ i ; , , , 19 Subd.�5. In the eVenC *he employer aad exclusJ.ve . ` i i5 representative �ail to execute a contraet pursuant to , . 16 subdivi5lon 4, they shall eaCh submit.tiheir respectiva final j ' 17 positions on those terms and conditions of employment,not 18 a4reed upon by the parties to tha board at least 75 days � , 19 prior;to the last date the enployeP is required to submlt 20 its tax leyy or budget, or certify the taxes voted to the ' ' ' , ' 21 appropriate pubiic officer, agency, gublic body or office, � 22 or by Octobar 1, whichever date Is eazTier , and except ior 23 essential employees shall eaeh indica�e if the�y rrequest 24 bindlr.g arb±tration . The parCJ.es.may stipulate to tha 25 board those agreed upan itams to be excluded tron 2b arbitration� Notw±thstanding a failure to comply with 27 su�divisions 4 and 5� the direcCor and the boara nay`take or 28 maintatn jurisd±nt+won under sections 179,71, subdtt�:sion 2�� .. 1 2 3 clause Cb), and 179.72. Sec. 20, Minnesota Statntes 1971, Section 1T9.70, Subdivisi,on 1� is amended to readt. . , lo L 4 179.70 ICONTRACTS= CRIEVANCESI AABITRATION,7. 5 SubdSVislon 1. A written.contract oz memorandum ot coatract 6 containing`Lhe agreed upon.terms and conditions of 7 employment;and such other_matter6 as may be agreed upon try' 8 the_ employer and excluslve representative shail be executad ._ .. ,. '. 9 by. the .parties. _-�P3� == �==ne��-s�re:' _ ".._L.. r__ . �-�n I 14 `�.:#�-�3s�ee•-itee�e-�--2o�3s�a�-b�='===- =��'�i'e�-se�+ee} � , ... _ . , .. i, 11 � . � _�e�t• 3}„ fiy i ; : _ _, �' 12 j 13 i �' 19� i 15 ', 16 , 17 iB ' ' , , , � _ _.._ „ . . .• •y ��• ..�w.1 � � . . . . . :. . . - _ . _. . . . . �--oi-eatts-eYerr-ntHa�ered-y�rest ,. ; torrtxe .. z-c�a�-�st�¢3�-gR ; The duratlon of the contract shall be negotiab2e'. Ali contracts.shal,l include a qriavance ----•�_-r_. _ . . Drocedure which ahall Drovide eompulsory btndin9 arbit:atioz oP grievances. _In the event.that tha parties cannot reach 19 agreement on,the grievance prccedure, they shall be subject 20 to the grigvance procedure promul5ated by ths director 21 Dursuant tp section 179.71, subdiYisl.on 5(i). ; 22 �Sec, �21. Minn�sota Statutes 1971r Section 179.70, , , . 23 Subdivislop,.2, is amended to reads,. . ; 24 Subd,, 2. Tha employer shall inple;,�ent .the tarms ot �he Z� contract in the Eorm of an ord3nance or re,oluClor,, If tt.e 26 a� 28 �.nPlementation of the t2rms of the contract require the adoption of:a law, ordinance, or charter an�na;nent, the employsr s�all make every reasonable effort to gjopose znd a � . � � i 2 3 4 5 6 . ; secure the enactment.of such law, ordinance, resolution, ar charter amendment. Notwithstanding any 2aw to the contrary, _,.�„�_�, public employers are hereby authorized to levy taxes or borrow such funds as are necessary,to implement arbitration awards pur,`suant to sections 174�70 and 179.72. Sec. '22. Minaesota Statutes 1971� Section 179.7�� ' 7 SubdSVision 4� is amended to Teadi 8 $ubd.`9, Tt the parties to s�contxact cannot agree 9 10 ' il 12 ' 13 � 14 15 !6 17 18 I9 ao a1 za 23 24 25 26 upon �a arbitrator or.arbitrators as provided by the � eontract qYievance procedures or the procedures established , , by the director� the parties_sha11, undar direction oi the chairman di the board, alternateiy'strike names from a list • i � of iiVe arbitrators selected by the board uatil only one � aatae �emai'ns which arhitrator shal! make his deCision reqardtrig'the grievance aAd it shalJ� be blriding upoA the � parties, •The—�e�°s pvbllc employer shall—°II�—��r�}.g. pay the costs and lees of the arbltrator� � Sec. 23. Mfnnesota Statutes 1973r Section 179.71, � Subdii�ision 3, Is amended to read: subd.i 3, The dYrector sriall determine appropriate units:. In determtning the appropriate unit he shali take � into consideration, along with:other relevant factors� the gTinctgles and the coverage of uniform comprehansgye Position classification and conpensation plans of the e mp l o y e e s�—v�e—;�-s�,��+y�-��--e�e�f �—e �—a�c�a��crr,� xnvolvement of profess3ons an8 skilled crafts and other ' , a7 Uccupatxona� classifications, re?evank administrative and 23 suparvxsory levels-of aufhority,—��..��.� i ;• , r ; 1 emp�opaes—c. geographicai 2oCation, and the � 2 recommendation of the parties , and shall place carticular 3 importance upon the history.a d extent of'orqanization And i— .� .,� �9 the desires of the petStfonlnq enPlaYee representaCive^s , , 5 ' In addition, aith regard to the inclusion or-exclusion � 6 oi supervisory empioyees, the director must find a majority �....�r..�.._.. � 7 of those functlons referred_ta in secCion 179.63, � , • 8 subdiVision 9, before an empioyee may be excluded as 9' supervisory,:. . -- - .. �: :._ _ . , , 14 ---He sh:all not designate-an appropriate unit whlch. ' , � i 11 includes�e3nployees subject.to section•179,63,.subdiviaioa - i � 12 li� with-einployees not Snciuded in section 179,63, - � ' ' �_ � ' �. . 13 subdi?�islon !1. . . ,, _ - _ . _ ; 14 -6ec, 24. .Minnesota Statutes 1971� sectian 179.72, • � 15 Subdfvision 6� Ys amended to•:eadi 16 __ Subd.'6...When Elnai positions Certified to the board ; 17 as Provided in section 179�69� sub�tvSsion 3r.or svbmitte3 18 to th� boa'rd_as provided in section 179.64, subdivision 5, 19 tri� board shall constitute an arbixration panel as Eollows; 20 The parties shall. under the direction oi the chairman 21 ot the.board� alternately strike.names from a llst of seven 22 arbit,ators untii only three names renain, which three 23 nembers shall be members o� the panel! PTOVided� hoWever, 29 that by nutual agreenent the partSes may salect a cin471e 25 arbitrator to hear the dispute. If the parties are unabie 25 to aqree o� �who shall strike the iirst nameJ the question 27 shall,be decided by the �21ip o# 8 coln. Yn submittinq narnes 2� o� arbitrators Co th� partie� tha board shail endeaVOr � � f� , � �. � � � ;� �` �i i ,� j, • 1 Q ti �. . � . � � �. . .{ 1 wheneVer possible to include names of persons from the 2 generai geographical area in whieh the public employer is 3 located. The panel shall assume and have jurisdiction over 4 the items of dispute certified to the board for whirh the 5 panel wa& constituted. The panel�"s oraers shall be issuedF 6 upon a majority vote af inembers considering a qiven dispute. ?: The members oE the panel shall be paid their actual and 8 necessary travelinq and other expeases iacurred in the - 9 performance of their duties plus a per diem ailowance of 10 6100 for each day or part thereoi while�engaged in the il consiaeratiion et a dispute. .Ail expenses and costs of the a 12 panel' shall be---�=�-��se�ee}..��y}}+�� paid by the ii • ..�� 13 �_:��__ pyb2ic emploYer to the dlspute. 14 ;Sec,.25. Minnesota Statutes �1972� Seation 179.72, 15 Subdivision 7� is amer�ded to•zeadi � 16 Subd; 7. The arbitration panal seiected by the parties '17 shal2 resolve the issues in dispute between the parties as 18 submitte4 by the board, and the paaeirs declsion and order i9 shall' be ginal and binding upon the parties-y-�etrb�}�e�r 2 0 �`�°r'�o-�3re'i��e'r'iff'--errs-e�-eabd�err-�3 , i f r e q u e s t e d . ...-.-�.-_.._.._� 21 by both partfes pursuant to section 179,69, subdiYislons 3 22 and 5., and provided, howev2r,.that,no deaision o� the pane? 23 which Vlolates any provision of the laws o� Mlnnesota ar 24 rules or regulations prom�al4ated theraunder or nuniciPal , 25 chaTters or ordinances or rasolu�ions ettacted pu.suant e 26 theretor ox which causes a penalty to be 12�curred , 2? �hereunder�•shail hav� any force or effect except as 28 authoxizad bY saction 179.70, subdivlsion 2. In I ''.. : . _ . ; , .' . . . i' 1 � � 10 P coasidering a dispute and issuing its arder the panei shall j' 2 Qive due consideration to the statutory.riqhts and I � 3 obliqations of public amployers to eEficienCiy managc and �' _ . ! 4 Conduct its o erations withi th 1 ,' �' ;, P n e. eqal limitations ' S aurroundinq_the financing of snch operations. The_panel�s 6 orders.shali-be issued by a majority vote of its members . 7�considering-a-qiven_dlspute. _The panel shall have no : 8 jur3sdlcti.on over nor authority.to;entc:tain any matter or 9 issue not 'within the definitian stated 3n section 179•b3, ;. ' 10 subdivlslo,n t8�.providad,_ however,'itema not within terns ; ll and cbnditions of.employmenL may.be includad in an_ ' 12 arbitration decision ii .such items are_contained in tho ' ' 13 employer�s final position. Aay issue or order or part 3 14 thereaf is'sued by-the panel determining any matter not � . . . . i .. . . . � . ' 15 included under sectioA l79.b3� subdtvisian aa o: the i 16 empioyer�s'final gosition sha11._be;yoid and of no effect. � : � 1? The,panel shali•render�its decision wlthin ten days �ron th� � 1B date o! submisslon o#.the partles respective positlons, but i9 in any eVent must iss¢e i_ts arder,by.Chs last date the . . , • . 20 emplo�+er is requli'ed by statute�. charter, or8lnance or 21 resolution to submit its tax levy or budget or certiiy its 22 taxes.voted to the apgrapriate public off2car, agency� .23 pub11C body or offiCe, or by NoVember 1� whicriever date is 2� e ar 1 ie r.^?�3se-�a,��ye-a�e�-�s3e-k:--�-=r^---s V ��-$es.r_�-as-�� 25 ��re?--�3ra3-��t�e�t-r•-��*'�c�ens--�c�� =�i�-eef��sa�� ' 26 �e'r-�ece3reY-e°rf�s-��►ex=-��-e�re�+�s�-�:�-;-a-rtv-o��e-38-�r 27 �: " �s-��r-�tr��e�r�--;��-a�`a- - _�a Sec_ ��. t.ttnnesota Starutes i��. �o..«r.,,, ,�ra ��_ 1 1 - - 1 . , 1&ubdiVision 9� is amended to readt �. ' ' ' , ' 2 Subd. 9. tlpon issuing its decistan and order involvintt 3 any dispute, the pane2 shsll transmit the order to the board 4 and to the.appropriate representatiYe or oi£icer of the 5 public employer and the employees. � 6 . +Ptts-�,tr�#e-�etny}�ye�--s#tai-�-#�eY�-i�ean-�i�e, y e.�tra ;,_ ,,..e-oi°eie��e-aCee��-9�e-�et5s�:et+t-aPte} B 9 10 li 1Z 13 14 15 ei�e�7-�"�� -�tt�i�-e��i-a�e:+--�e#e�-tse-�et-�e�-wi�ti-�+-�ke-�e�r �'-�'�--__ :: � e�e}e:o-aFtss }� e �_� : -°��-bea�-a9e�ba�ei etrei-a�e�-�-,xve--¢�t�e�s--�Fke-�-`_,= -'�ieye�-�hei'��-�ke ' . !4pl�l��'�i,i i ..r..� � .. e�es� l�` a�.1�_.� �T{C1YS'��:.��.�.vaG—e�w___6...... ._. _LGdq,y� � 17� ViYGi Triti��' . 1 See. 27. Minnesota Statutes 1971r Section 179.T2, is� amended by�addin9 a subdivision to readt Subd. 10�, At th° request of �he exclusive 15 representative to a dispnte involving any essential 17 employees,,the board shail proeeed in accordance with' �� M 18 section 279.72 and the order shall:ba•binding on both 19 parties. .Tha parties nay stipulate.those agreed upon item5 20 to be:extludad from a:bitration, ' 21 5ec. �6. Minnesota Statut2s;1971� 5ection 179,73, 22 SubdiYision 2, is amended to readii � ; ' . 23 SUbd, Q, The professional empio�ees shall select a 24 rep:esentative to meet and condflr ��r1th a representative or 25 26 conmxttee of the public employei on mattars nat specSEied under section 179.63, subdivisio;� 18 relating to tihe t27 services being provided to the qUblic� The public emgloyer 28 shall Provide the facilitias and set �ha ttne �or sucn �o Q . n ,� � � � � � . � � 3 M9 , 5 ' 6 i � , . 7 ; 6 conferences to take piace, provided that the parties shall meet taqether at least orice every four months. „ _Sec, 29, Mlnnesota Statutes.1971� Section 179.�4i 5ubdivisioa 4,, Is amended to readr _ �—�, fo R Subd. 4. The neqotiatinq.teara shall meet an4 negotiate with the:exclusiVe,representative of app.ropriate units In the,manaer,prescribed by sections 179.61:to l79.77t Drovisled, however,.that the director oE medlation.services � 9 shall�define-appropriate uaits oi state employees as all the '�� 10 �mpioyees uttder the same appointing.authorSty exeept where � 11 Droiessional� 9eoqraphical or othez consideratSons affectinq ' 12 employne2nt�reiations clearly require appropriate units of .� i3 some othe��+eampesrncr�3:err conposition . Regardless of unit ' 14 determfnat3on, the qoverno� r may upon the.unantmous written ' 15 request of,..exclusive representatives of units and appointing 16 authorities.direct that aeqotiations be conducted foz one �r _ . . ... , ', 17 more_appoi}�tin4 authorities in a commoct proceedin4. , 18 19 ' ' zo 21 ' 22 � 23 24 5ec. 30._ Minnesota Statutas 1971��SeeYion 179.7A, Subd3vislon 5, is amended to readi; � Subd., 5. 2he negotiatinq._tea� Ls authorized to and may enter into—:�er:�e�+re a4reements—h�,.. Th° Provisions of said agreements which establish wages and econonic frin4e bene��ts shall ba subrtitted to the;legislatuce� Sec. 31. biinnesota Statutes 1971, uectSon 179�75, , 25 Subdivision 8, is amende6 to reads, � 2b Subd.�8, t4lnnesota Statutes-�� 1971 , Sact.ons , 27 185.07 to 185.28r shall—s°r9�-�—�1ee?��—t� BpylY to�—ar.� all .....�.... �4 nubl+s--eta�3-e�� employe�s , includir.cJ those sA�cificall�� . . +� , . �o s ; , � _ ; � � 1 excepted from the deiinition of public employee in section. i , 2•179.63, subdivision 7 r except as sections 185.07 to 185,18 3 may be inconsistent with section 179.bB , �, k Sec. 32. Minnesota Statutes 1971r 5ectSons 179.69, • �' 5 Subdlvision 7� 179.71, Subdivisiea 4t 179.72, Subdivisions i— 1 6 10, il� and 13t 179.73, SubdiVisiOns 3� 4, and 5f and I.r__�..—�...w �' i 179.75, Subdivislons 1, 2y 3, 4j 5, 7, and 9, are repealed. � ' ,'� , ; �� . � � � � 1' ; . � , ;' � ; _ , : — , . { , ,1 , a � ; i ;. • ; ., , �, � • , �' � . . ' , . � . � �.._ � � � ... 1 . . � . � � . � ' . . . .. � . .. � , � � .. � . � � . j , ' t _ 1. , ' ■ �I �_ J ' u ' � , ' t � lJl � ' � ��oo° �� Association ofMinnesota Counties 55 Sherburne Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 A.C. 612 222-5521 Issue No. 4 !d T I � �� 3 .:.r� �~� i � r � '� �� i�.�,i km� � League of t4linnesota ,�lunicipalities 330D Uniuersity Avenue 5.�. Manneapolis, Minnesot¢ 55414 A.C. 612 373-J9J2 February 7, 1973 Fundamental changes in the Public Employment Re3ations Act of 1971 now are being considered by the Minnesota Legislature. The specific bill, x.F. 295 (S.F. 365), is supported strongly by the AF'L-CIC and other labor groups. A public hearing was neld February 6th at which time Burke Rayiaond, Village Manager of Roseville, oPfered the reraarks printed below in testi- mo� to the Aouse Labor Management Relations Committee (Stan Enebo, chair- man). About 20 othe: local governnent officials spoice as well in opposition to H.F. 295• Attached is a camplete list of the Senate and House Laber co�ittee memberships. You may wish to contact individual members and offer your views. � +t � � • My name is Burke Raymond and I am the Village Manager in Roseville. I am appearing here today on behalP of the League of Dlinnesota P.4unicipalities. For the last three years I have serve3 as the Chairman of the League's Committee on Public Employee Labor Relaiions and for tbe past ter. years have been involved in labor mzragemenu relstions in three sepa:ate mur,i- cipalities here in h?ir_r.a_sota, Or, behalf o° the League, I ais� �o ex�.ess our appreciation to tne Chairman end the members of the Committee for the opportunity to offer our cor.nents on $.F. 295, As many of you know, ±he League has taken a very positive and intease inter- est in labor-sanagement r=�ations !'or a nu�ber oF years, k'e drafted a comprehensive bill that was ir.troduced into tne 1971 legislati:;e wnich provided ior a publ.ic esployment iabur relations board,.for exc_usive re- presentatioa and for a li�iied rig'r,t to sirike. Ir. fact, sone o� the lar.- guage of the �resent statute came directly from our bi1L I recite these facts in order to emphasize that the League has supporte3 and ccntinues to support collective bargainin� :or pu�'_ic employees. i� pu:pose in a,�pearing here today i5 IIOL t0 A;1�figE 1:? �,,:i1v^SCDRICB.! C"bate 3}JOUL TvtiC'�%1@Y' OP POL public emplcyees should have the rig: ± to fo:m and join iabor ;.r.ior.s +� , �.:ie � zeY• or not ±he;; s'r.ould have t;^.e ;ig�t te bsroain collecti:reiy with ;.uoiic e�piovers, or even whe+,ner or not they si.:�u�d ;,�;e a i;mited r;�'ri to st:i'_:�, ihe Leei�, ;.. ,, -;5 answer to these three questions nas be_n and coniiaues io be "yes." CLL CCP �••i• 7n Ltl3�' ��':P°� 1C- _I:3 � .._:.n�2:''..�.V�i 2T,. 2.CP.1?� .1 _a_ . P.- � . � , ',� � ,. .,., ' .� ,�_� � _} . .; , � _ . . '�'" ' ".s 1 . �i . .�'�a i . � �� '_.,.. . `16G L,.?':G� y P .;'.:�.' . ',- .. �..c� �Dl .i� � Gi' �2 ..LC_lt. L �".ar �. i`y'C decisions and set pric i�ies thrci:gn their e ecied goverr�-Pn�4_ �eo�e e__?atives; i3) �oes not prev�.,� local u:u;:s of Go�err.n:ent from �;oridir.g services ;n e reasonabiv efficient and res_onsive n�?:,r.er; ar.d k � � � (lOES *'i �* Q�_;7 7'15:7 ':11? . rights and cpiions o� ir,dividua� pu��ic er.;�loyees. ."vfter reviewi g r.:�. ��5 �. � _ 2 _ io u in cottsiderable detail, we have come to the conclusion that taken as a whole ' it would bring about all of these adversr results. In fact, we view it as a genuinely revolutionary piece of legislation vhich, if enacted, would literally change our democratic form oP local government as we have known it. ' This is a rather broad statement which I do not make rashly. Therefore, I would like to cite the speciPic reasons and the sections of the bill to sup- port this conclusion. However, before doing so, I Would like to sketch out ' briefly what we believe to be the basic purpose o£ legislation governing labor relations in the public sector. In our view, the purpose of such legislation is to balance the interests and the rights af the employees, on the one hand, � and the public (i.e., the public employers) on the other, in a way which will encourage the settlement of differences and disputes through the collective bargaining process. If this balance is not maintained and the process be- , comes heavily biased in favor of either one of the parties, then the law will have the effect of impeding and undercutting the collective bargaining process rather than facilitating it. We also beZieve there are unique circumstances ' present in our governmental system that are not present in the private sector which demand that great care be exercised in order to maintain the proper balattce between these interests. For ezample, public employee unions are becoming increasingly active in the political process and this provides them ' with effective means of making their vierrs known quite apart from those avenues provided in the law. � If H.F. 295 were enacted into law in its present form, it would result in four very serious consequences which I would like to comment on in some detail. , 1. It would sreatly enhance the raw bar�ainina power of public unions. First of all, it would substantially increase the tactical tools which they could employ to gain concessions on both econoaic and non-economic issues. For example, Sections 5 and 6 ot' H.F. 295 would authorize a public employee union � composed of non-essential employees to strike if: (1) the public employer reflised to comply with the provisions of a valid decision of an srbitrator; (2) the public employer refused to request bfnding arbitration when requested ' by the exclusive representative; or (3) vhen mediation services have been exhausted and an impasse is reached. In other words, once the mediation services have been exhausted, the union eould either legally call. a strike , or coerce the public employer into requesting binding arbitration, whichever course of action would produce ihe greatest concessions, and neither the public employer nor the general public would have any effective'recourse. ' Another example is Section 16, Subdivision 3> which by deleting clauses 12 and 13 would permit secondary boycotts. This means an employee union could close down any governmental operation - a hospital, an electric power plant, or a ' water or secrage treatment plant - merely by setting ap a picicet line which was observed by other unions, and thereby preventing the delivery of goods or services. ' ' , Second, H.F. 2g5 would greatly expan� union influence on the level of taxing and spending and the use of financial resaurces which are now the nrerogative of local governing bodies. Section 16, Sub3. 2, adds a clause (11) which mskes it an unfair labor practice for the emoloyer to refuse "..to provide... sll information pertaining to the public etaplayer's budget both present and pro- posed, revenues and other financing infor.�a.tion." This section taken together ' 1 -3- /a ✓ .I with Section 21, subd. 2, which states "'...public employers are hereby author- , ized to levy taxes or borrow such fluids as are necessary to implement arbitra- tion awards..." means that all of the spending priorities of any governmental jurisdiction wouid be placed on the bargaining table. F�rthermore, in order to comply with an arbitration award, the local government involved would ' either have to exceed the statutory levy limit and take the required financial penalty or curtail other programs or expenditures. These sections would ef- fectively negate Chapter 179.66, subdivision l, which specifically states , that "A public employer is not required to meet and negotiate on matters of inherent management policy, which include...the fhnetions and programs of the employer, (and) its overail budget..." ' � ' ' ' Third, H.F. 295 would nake it possible for minority unions to be designated as the exclusive representative and would tend to perpetuate a union in power once it received recognition. Section 1, Subd. 6, permits an exclusive repre- sentative to be desi�nated by a majority of those voting in an election rather than requiring an affirmative vote b3� a majority of all those in the bargain- ing unit as is required by the present lac�. Thus, in the event of a small turnout in a representation election, a union representing considerably less than a majority of the total employees in the unit might be recognized as the exclusive bargaining representative. Furthermore, once such recognition is granted, Section 7, Subd. 2, provides that except for teachers, "..all employees who are not members of the exclusive representative may be requiredc by said representative to contribute a fair share fee for services rendered by the exclusive representative, and the employer...shall be obliged to check off ssid fee from the earnings of the employee and transmit the same to the exclusive representative," ' Fourth, H.F. 295 Would allow unions to exercise considerable control over governmental operations which have traditionally been the management preroga- tives of the elected governing bodies and the sanagement staff. Seciion 4, , Subd. 18, would amend the definition of the term "terms and conditions of employment" by deleting the specific lazrguage in the present statute which excludes matters of inherent managerial policy from the bargaining process. ' This would open up all policy matters that have any impact on the employees to bargaining and binding arbitration. 1 ' ' 1 , ' 2. operations. First, local governnents wou13 have very few,JifVany, key�staff personnel tiiat would be excluded from union bargaining units. For example, Section 2, Subd. 8, redefines "confidential employee" in such a way that only employees who actively participate in labor negotiations on behalf of the public employer would be excluded from the bargaining unit. And Section 3, Subd. 9, and Section 23, Subd. 3, taken together redefine "Supervisory employee" in such restrictive terms that not more than about 50 of the 854 municipalities in Minnesota have even one supervisory employee. This is because under the present statutes, charters and civil service s,vstems very few employees personal- ly have legal authority to hire, transfer, suspend, promote, discharge, assign, reward or discipline otner employees or direct them or adjust their grievances. Yet according to Section 23, Subd. 3, the director of inediation services would have to find that the employee had authority to do a majority of these functions in order to be excluded from the bargaining uait as a supervisory employee. 1, _ �o c.v 1 ' � , ' ' ' . I ' �I , �� ' � � , ' ' -k- Finally, Section 9, Subd. 6 requires the public employer to extend exclusive recognition to an organization of supervisory and confidential employees for the purpose of negotiating terms or conditions of employment. This means that under the terms of this bill there would be absolutely no public employee who would not potentially fall within a bargaining unit. Second, public employers would lose effective supervisory control over those of their employees who are elected officers or appointed representatives of the exclusive representative. Section 12, Subd. 10 requires public employers to grant unlimited time off with pay to these union officials for the purpose of conducting the duties of the exclusive representative and must also provide them with leaves of absence upon request. Third, a public employer's ability to obtain relief for any unfair labor prac- tices committed by any employee or union is substantially limited by Section 32 which repeals the authority of district courts to issue temporary and permanent restraining orders or injunctions and to assess other penalties under the Act. Fourth, the sections cited above which permit strikes and binding arbitration at the discretion of the exclusive representative, once mediation has been exhausted and an impasse remains, obviously severely limits the public employer's ability to control both taxes and eacpenditures. Ftiu-thermore, by broadening the scope of bargaining to include what have historically been management preroga- tives and by permitting unions to initiate secondary boycotts as a coercive device, the public employer's ability to manage its affairs is severely re- stricted. 3• Then enactment of this bill would undermine the collective bar ainin ro- tcess. The availability of binding arbitration vould be a powerful disincentive o employee unions to negotiate in good faith. This is particularly true since Section 22, Subd. 4, and Section 24, Subd. 6, provide that the public employer will pay all expenses and costs involved in arbitration. Indeed, it would be difficult to imagine a set of circun:stances vhere it would not be to the unions advantage to obtain all the concessions possible at the bargaining table and then Porce the issue to binding arbitration. In addition, since the exclusive representative would have at its disposal several coercive tactics including the secondary boycott, there would be a constant tenptation to use them as an alternative to engaging in serious negoti- ations. Finally, the repeal of the provision in the present law which permits joint negotiations among public employers and exclusive representatives would forc� the termination of one of the more innovative and sur�essful exp?riments in collective bargaining in blinnesota which has received national recognition. Under Chapter 179.71, Subd. 4, negotiations have been conducted between Local �9 of the International Union of Operating Engineers and a number of suburban municipalities. A similar pattern of joint negotiations is slcwly emergin� with Local 320 of the Te�sters Union which represent.s the police officers ir. several suburban municipalities. 1he ratior.ale for repealing this provision and thus forcing the discentinuation of these joint negoti.ations is not clear. ' J -5- �i. Ttlls bi17. vnulA infi-;,�,.e ,.�, au._ __� «•. / o ,� ' sentative. Individual employees who did not support eitherLLofVtwocunions involved in a runoff election, would lose their ability to participate in such an election. This situation arises as a direct result of the provision ' of this bill that would have exclusive representatives designated by a majority of those voting in a representation election rather than a major- ity oP the total employees in the unit as provided in the present law. ' Individual employees would also lose the right to request and be allowed dues checkoff for the organization of their choice, if there is an exclusive representative. Section 8, Subd. 5, provides that the right to request and , be allowed dues checkoff is limited to the exclusive representative Where there is or.e. 1 , ' ' ' , , ' Except for teachers, individual employees would be forced to contribute a "fair share fee" to the exclusive representative, even though they are not members and may in fact be opposed to the organization. The reason for ex- cluding teachers Prom this provision is not apparent. Although I have not attempted to cover all of the provisions of H.F. 295, I think the citations above are sufficient to demonstrate that this bill would indeed have a profound effect upon the bargaining power of public employee unions,upon the viability of our governmental system, upon the rights of individual employees, and upon the collective bargaining process. In fact, several o: its provisions go well beyond anything that is presently found in the statutes of either the federal government or the state of Minnesota governing collec+ive bargaining in the private sector. Therefore, to ca11 H.F. 2g5 a revolutionary proposal is not inappropriate. fiowever, I would suggest that no case has been made for any such revolution- ary approacn to labor-management relations in the public sector. The present law has been in effect scarcely seven months. Many of its provisions have not been tested. While the present law is by no means perfect, any amend- ments should be considered in a meticulous and exacting nanner. Therefore, we respectfully suggest that H.F. 2g5, together with ar�y other bills which would amend the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971, be reier:ed to a subcommittee of this committee for the carefui and thoughtful review they deserve. ' , ' , 2/73cc ' � 1� .. . r� y , _6 ' HOUSE LABOR-MANAGEMENT REI,pTIONS Enebo, Chairman (60B) McEachern (18B) Ojala, Vice-Chairman (6a) +McFarlin (41B) '' ' Carlson, B. 0. (14B) Miller, M. J. (7,2A) Connors (46S) �e �65B� Eckstein (28B) +Ohnstad (19A) ' +Flakne (61A) Pehler (17B) +Forsythe (39A) +Pieper (53B) ��'a �SSA) +Pleasant (39B) +Hagedorn (27B) Ryan (6kB) ' Jaros (7B) St. Onge (4A) +Klaus (25A) Sarna (S5B) LaVoy (8A) +Schreiber (45A) ' +McArthur (45B) , SENATE LABOR AND CONAfERCE ' Hansen, C. R., Chairman (31} +Larson, L. (35) Thorup, S., Vice-Chairman (47) I,aufenburger, R. (34) +BanB� �• (39) Novak, E. (64) ' +Berg, C. (15) +Olson, J. (26) Davies, J. {(p) Perpich, A. J. (6) +Hanson, R. (10) Solon, S. (7) Keefe, S. (59) Speaz, A. (57) , +Kowalezyk, A. (45) ' ' ' ' ' + votes with organization minority ��indicates district represented ' ' ' 1 1 � / �'. �10,Q.E�a� . � RESOLUTION N0. �� / � �� '�— p g$SOLUTION REQUESTING PASSAGE OF AMENDMENTS TO �� '� � PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT LABOR RELATIONS ACT OF 1971 IN PLACE OF THOSE AMENDMENTS CONTAINED IN HOUSE FILE 295 ' WHEREAS, the Fridley City Council has received and carefully considered House File 295 which amends the Public Employment Relations Act of 1971; and � WFIEREAS, House File 295 as now written would cripple the ability of local units of government to control taxes, expenditure programs and operations; and ' 47HEREAS, the League of Minnesota Municipalities and Mr. David Kennedy, Legislative Liaison for the City of Fridley, have prepared a series of amendments to the Public Employment Relations Act of 1971 which we believe ' correct the deficiencies now contained in said act; NOW, TfIEREFORE, BE ZT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL that the Council , strongly urge the House Labor-Management Relations Committee of the Minnesota Legislature to substitute the attached amendments for House File 295, and that copies of this Resolution be distributed to the Chairman � Stanley Enebo and members of the House Labor-Management Relations Committee. � � � PASSED ANII ADOPTED BY THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL THIS �',�/' DAY �F /-'t'`�-/ , 1973. FRANK G. LIEBL, MAYOR � . ATTEST: ' � MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, CITY CLERK ' � � ' ' ' , , ' ' ..��i:r ' { . . � .� . F � ` � ��.��: •�„_.. .� ► � , � �� ._ , . �� fl�a e � . GATEWAY . TO THE NORTH� . � �. � � �PIHEWOOD . �� HILLVIEW � Kr+o��w000 � TWELVE OAKS O� �oul I J �V� . . RAMSEVCOUNTY,MINNESOTA 240t HIGHWAV 10 ST.PAUL,MINN.55172 784-3055 February 6, 1973 RE: VILLAGE OF NEW BRIGHTON VS. METROPOLITAN WUNCIL ET AL The Mounds View Village Council has requested that the communities that have previously expressed an interest in the matter of the Village of New Brighton attempting to have their trunk sanitary sewer acquired as a metropolitan intereceptor, be notified that legal action against the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Sewer Board has been insti- tuted by New Brighton to gain a declaratory judgement in their favor. The hi�unds View Village Council feels that our interest in this matter can best be protected by intervention and would like to know if there is any support £or their position. Richard rfeyers, Mounds View Village Attorney, estimates that legal expenses wi11 be between $S,GGC.00 and $12,OOO.GO and are too prohibitive to fa11 on only hicunds View. Mr. Meyers has reviewed the summons and complaint, spoken with the attorney for the Metropolitan Courci:, and sent a letter (enclosedl to the Village Council which supports a joint in=ervention in this matter. If your Council supports intervention or has any questions in this matter, please repi�• either to r.ryself or Nr. >Sey�rs. iSincerely, Dennis S Zylla, C7erk-Administrator DSZ/mw Copi� to: ✓ ,'�Sr. Gerald Davis, hfanager - Fridley Mr. Wayne Danheim, Administrator - Circle Yines Mr. John Cottingh2m, hlunager - Coon Rapids P�ir. Don Busch, ddministrator - Spring Lake Yarx :ir. Benj_; ASunsun, Mati-or - Lexingtcn r1r. Clarence Motz, hlanager - Blaine ,NOWqq�p NEISE(3� MAYOR AERA�OJOHNSON�COUNGLMAN JOV�N PICKAR, COUNCILMAh ROGER HqUM4AVPTPlER, COUNCILMAN �0.VRLD HOpGES, COUNCILMAN DENNIS 2YLLA, C�_EF.K-qOA±: N�yTRpTC llI � ' ` ' ' ' ' ' , ' �� FEINBERG. MIRVISS. MEYERS, SCHUMACHER� &�MALMON, P.A. � � � ATTORNEYS AY CAW � . TNE TOwERi �. � � .. . . . � . � OATEp�V CENTER�� . � � � IIE MENNEIIN AVENUE � � � �MINNEAPOLIB, M-INNESOT.A SSq01 aaeou� 1RN0�0 I GE:NBERG 18R4Ei MIRVI99 . RICMqRD MEVERS JAMES.J. SCMVMI.CMER AIVIN 8. MI.LMON FOBEFT H SCNVM/�CNER GEOn'GE G. gElT2 Village of DIounds View 2401 Highway 10 St. Paul, T�Iinnesota 55112 February 1, 1973 RE: Gillage of New Brighton vs. i�ietropolitan Council et al Attention: Dennis S. Zplla Gentlemen: � ua EuBVqB4N OFFICES� RICMFIEIp NEW Bq10NTON LE%IN4TON ' I have reviewed the summons and complaint relative to the above captioned matter. The Village of New Brighton seeks by means of a declaratory judgment action to have the court overrule the Pietropolitan Council's decis�on not to acauire a i�ew Brignton ' interceptor on the grounds that such action was unreasonable, arbitrary, discriminatory, unlawful and void. , As you know tne Village of �ieio Brighton constructed an interceptor that lies whoZly within said Village, and which services sewer cor.nections o�ithin the Village as well as certai.n , portions o£ tne neiahborina vill-aae of Arden Hills. Because said interceptor does service some area outside of its village limi*s the Village of New Brighton requested the :fletropolitan Council ' to declare the interceptor a metropolitan interceptor �•�nich would then be purcnased by tne ti'tropolitan Council and charged back against tiie co*nmunities lying witnin Service District -'- 2. mhe figure most commonly used is tiiat vew Brighton would receive , approximately $67,000.00 a year £or a 30 year period, said amounts to be enarged back to tne Service District �` 2 communities, c�hich includes, of course, the Village of ��iounds View. , ' , Village of Mounds View -2- llB Certain communities indicated at the time that the Metropolitan Council made its decision t`rzat they were not in favor of this take-over and there are a number of factual and legal questions that will have to be resolved by the Court before a final determination is made. There is no question that the idetropolitan Council will defend its actions and that it will be represented by competent legal counsel. However, it was asked as to whether or not there would be any value for the individual communities within Service District 2 to intervene in the law suit to protect their individual interests. Although the Metropolitan Council will undoubtedly enter a vigorous defense in this matter, if a decision that is favorable to the Village of New Brighton is rendered, the ultimate costs would be passed on to the communities in Service District 2 and would not be absorbed by the Metropoli.tan Council or the entire metropolitan area. This factor together with the fact that there may be legal relationships between various communities prior to the Metropolitan Council take-over that may be relevant to this case plus other facts that may or may not be generally available to counsel for the Metropolitan Council would indicate that intervention in this law suit may be in the best interests of the communities within Service District 2. Tne Rules of Civil Procedure provide the method for intervention. Although I believe that intervention would be valuable, desirable not only on behalf of the communities but on behalf of the bletropolitan Council, I do not believe t:�at one or two cosmunities should carry the burden of this litigation. This undertaking should be carried forward on a joint effort by all or a substantial amount of tne communities within Service District 2 for several reasons: (1} The Court would be impressed by the unanimity of action by tne Service District 2 communities in opposing the take-over. (2) Tne expenses of tne litigation would be su£fic�.ently spread among the commur.ities so that the cost thereof would not constitute a burden on any one comt-nunity. I have consulted with the attorney for the Aletropolitan Council ' and he indicates ti:at interve.tion by a substantial number of the Service District 2 communities would be of value to the �•Ietroaolitan Council's position in this case and that he would welcome this aid. ' ' ' i llC Village of Mounds View - 3- Therefore, although I am of the opinion that intervention would be desirable in this particular law suit, I do not believe that this should be done unless a substantial amount of the communities in Service District 2 participate on a joint efforts basis to present a united front and spread the expenses that will be i purred. I �� Your� very;tr�ly, � , ;` � ; ,J,�y � �tichard MeyerS �],iage Attor�iey! Village of Mounds View RP4:mjm \ � i , , ' � ' HENNEPIN COUNTY 330� UNIVERSITY AVENUE S.E. ' , ' 0 OF MUNICIPALITIES MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55414 373-9992 POSITIOli OP THE AF,�iNEPIN COUNTY LEAGpB OF MONICIPALITIES IN REGARD TO THE ?lET&OPOLITAN COUNCIL � Paasad by the mmnbership 2-1-73 ' Th• Le�gua balievea that; 1, Ths Council ehould provids planning asalstaace to local unito of govexnment ' to as�ure orderly gravth of the entire netro area, 2. In regard to aelsction of tho Couneil: ' a. Councilmanbert ahould be •lected by local city and village Councils, who ahall be appostionad votea �o es to inaura edherenca to the one-mse, one-vote conceot baoed on eopulation. , A� a second choice, the 14 Couneilmen ahould be slncted, directly, by Che peaple. b. Tha number oY Councll maabera ehould not be increased beyond tha pre�enC manberphip of 14 Couacilmen and a Chaiiman, regasdlesg of what changee ar• made ip the Dietrict boundarisa. C. Ths Chairman should oontinµa to be appointed by th• Governor e�d should eontinue to b• full time, d. Tsrme �hould b• Pour qear� with•one-half of the Couneil+aan eleeted evary two yeas�. 3. Ia Tespect to organizakioa pnd etructure: s. The Counell shouid dava opprational and administrative control only in thoee areae sp�eifieall� authorized by the Stats legislature. b. Funeeione qs�ignsd to th� Couaeil for operaCiooal and administrativa oontsol should ba oraaaized as dnosrtmants, not as oeparate boasda or crnmoiasio�s, c. Rsrpon�ibili:y fo� maps transit, airporks, and oanitary ewer aqrvices . ahould ba tranata�s�d ty Chs Metropolitan Council. ihe present comaiPalopr and boards, euch qe the Transit Caumiseion, kha Saw�r Boesd, thp pI¢txopolitan Alrports Cammiation, and othare. eould be ', r�ealned ia an advisorv caoacitv to Che Metropolitan Counetl. ' , ' � �Z� d, Metropolitan Council, plannkng £unetions, with respoct to municipalities, in all other aseas should be advieory only. 4. In regard ta fsdacal grant s4view; 12A a. AppllcaGlopt foz Pederal grante shoyld be approved or dieapproved on their � own marite. The Couacil should not use its review authority oves applications for foderal Qrants to influence the actions of municipalitiea in subjeet areas not direatly reletad to trie application> � ' ' , ■ J ' ' � , 1 , ' ' ' � 1 b, Ths Council ahall bear the burden of damonstrating Chat aubject areas considezad in sach revieWS are directly related. The Leagua"s philosophy wae that ihe Council does and shonld exist, but that e�cperiance to date pointa to needed changee. A metropolitan�ide organization can prov�.des a more comprehmelvn piature of the �tire area than can any one local unit of government. Tha a�alysis ot �clstipg trende, the study of new or changed policiea, and recommsndatione for alternat3v� directiona can be acaompliahed� and can serve as a batis fas aotlo�, The provfding of euch infom�ation 1e a valuable function of the Council and ia consietenC with tho goal of planninA assiatance. Thsre ia a netural tendancy of any oxganization to seek more authority. Aowever vell iatended, or rrall motivated� iocreaeed authoritq to operate must be axtended only by the legislature a£ter thorough inveatigation and hearings. The reason is •lmple. 'Larger uaite of goyerpment mean lesa reeponaive government to the individual aitizan. Thesefose, the balance between efficienay, or economice, or coordination, or wlutever the goal, and responsiveaesa must be weighed carefully, The Cauncii must be respontible primarily to tha people through their local units of government. The League beliavas that electioa will i�sure responaive membere; but it also reeognizes tha diftieulty encountered by elEizene ac large when faoed with extremaly long ballaCS, Aa example of this dl.ffieuitq is the electLon of judges, The league khetefpre £eals thet Che most appropriate is election by city and viilage Conncils, 'fhare ia an unquestioped relationahip betvsen certain aapaets of davelopmenC; for uxample, the extension of utilitles, the location of nev highvays, and the availability of tran�it haa an abvioua effect on new population ceneers, The interdepeadency of aome aepests of growth may, hovever, be qusstionable, In eamm ca�es there may be no relatlpnship or depeqdency. Tha League believea it 1a a proper and neseasary funcG�.on of the Hetropolitsn Council to anaiyze +and oomment upon the ralatloaship of a partieular gxset application to other areas pf devalopmnnt. • However the League belisvee that vhere i� 1s a qusstionable relationehip between a$rant appllcatlon and o[her areas of development, or desirable goels, th� borden of proof ahould lie with the Council to demonstrate that there is, Qr ahopld be, a relet;lon�hip, Tn additiono conefetent w�.th that balief, the League iurthsr believee that whaTe thera is aboolutelq no xelationship between the grant appllcatlon and othar exsas of development or aocial goals, tha atatus of •uah oiher developmant ot aocial goals should not be coneidered in determining tha advisabllity pf the g;ant. 2^S°79 MBMSBR$ OF THE ME'PROPOLITAIi CUUNCIL LEGISLATIV� CtR4�lITTEEt Clyde Allen, Bloomington - Cheirman J1m Wiilit, Plymouth Bob Neegele, Shorawood Wayne Hurggraaff, Richfleld Nail Sorenaon, Medicino Lake Jim Anderson, Bloomington Chria Cherches, SC. Louit Park Bill i.everf.ng, Mapls Plain Marq Butler, Ozonp Robert &igge, Galden Vallcy Azthur Bradeson, Edina Ed Erickson, New Hope Garrit Schmidt, Sp.rin$ Park Ewald'Peterson, Champlin Brank Brixiuo, Greenwoad Carl Grass, Brooklyn Geater Roa Espe, Crystal (leaving for out�atate positlon) � - �2 B I , �J ' STREET DEPARIM�NT � ' ■ I , 1, 2, 3. 4. 5. b. 7, $. 9. 1Q. 11. PUSLIC WpF�EC$ AEFARTMENT GITY OF FRIDLEY YEARI.Y REPORT FOR 1972 Cleaning . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Crackf111ing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gurbing . . . . , , � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Grading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ga-avel Nauling and Surfacing . . . . . . . . , . , Miscellanepus Str6et Work . . . . . . . . . . . . Patching . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shop Tima . . , . , . Signa, Barricades and SchooJ Crossings ...... Stabiliaing wlth Chlorida . . . . . . . , . . . , Equipmenk Repaire - &treak . . . . . . . , . . . . ' WATER DEPAATMENT 1. 2. 3� 4. 5• 6. 7, 8. 9. 10, 11. 12. 13. Filtratipn Pleqt Operations . . . . . . . . , , , Final Readinga and Collections . . , . . . . , , . Hydrant Repaire and Fluahing . . . . . , , . . . . Mlecellaneous Water Work . , • • • . . , . . . . . pumphouse Work , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Standpipa Repairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valve Inspectlons and Repaira . . . , , . . . . . Water end Sewer Inepections . . . . . . . . , . . WaCer Meter Inapectlons a�:d Repairs . , , . , , . Water Turn-ons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Watey�nain Bieaka . . . . . . < . . . . . . . . . . Watermain Tape . . , . . , . . , , , . . . . Equipment Repaira - Water , . . . , . . . . , . . HOURS 2,440 96 3p8 43 111� 2,7b1 3,069� 1, 841'� 1,60k� 26 2,629 3,204 573 1,404 1,41.8 1,445'� 539� zoz 162� 526'� 171 847 31� b86� 0 SEWER DEPARTMENT 1. z. 3. 4. 5, fi. 7. Lift Skatloz� Inapections and Repaire ,,, ..,,. Manhole Repair. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Miacallaneaus &eWer Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sanitary Sewer Break . . , • . . . . . , . . , , . Sanleary Sewar Cleani.ag , , , , , , , , , , , , , �anitary Sewer InepQptlone , . . . , , , , . , . , �quipment Repaire - Sewer • . . . , , , , , , . , STORM SEWER DEPARTTIENT 1,526 zoz� 1,522=; 52 2,767� 689� 965 1, Catsh Basirt aad SCOrm 3ewer Cleaning . ..... 644� 2. �Iiacellaneous Starm S�wer Work . , , . . . . . . , 853 Fags Two PU$LIO WORKS A�PARTMENT YEARLY REPORT FOR 1972 SNOW AND TCB CONTROL ��,�. 1. Miscellaneoue Snaw and Ice Work . . , . . . . , . . 364 2. Ssnding - Ice Contro� , , • . . . . . . . . . � . . 480 3. Snaw Plowing , . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,438� 4. Equipment Repairs - Snow and Ice . . . . . . . . . 831 MISCELLANEOUS 1. Y. 3. 4. �• 6. 7. B. 9, lp. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15, 16, 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23, 2k. 25. 26. 27. 2$. 29. 39. 31. 32. 33. 34. 3S, 36. 37. 39. A,P.W,A. (Schools) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 6 Brake School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Corporation Xard , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 813 Defenaive Driving School . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 �ngineering Aepartmenk , . . . . . . . . . . . . 130� Engineering - Digging Riveryiew . . . . , . , , . . 47'� F1re Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Fire Departmenk School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 Flood Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Funerals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Hennepin County Purchaeing Meeting , . . . . . . . 8 Holidays . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,796 Injury on Job - ,Toaeph Gansior . . . . . . . . . . j2 Injury on Job - Donald Stiller . , . . . . . . . . 16 I,abor Negotiations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Liquor Storage Rvom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 517'�' Ziquor Starea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 Locke Lake Dam , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Mechenic (Paper Work for Keeping Re�ords) ..... 85� Metro Sewer Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Park Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1, 258 Plowing Around Hydranta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Police Aepartment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47� project No. 102 (Addendum �k2-Stoneybrook) . . . . . 1,142� Sewer pepartment School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Sew�r Jet Machine Schaol . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Sick Leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,262 Vacations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,�45 Votisng Booths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Wate� Department�Schvql . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 Week�nd Auty . , , , . . . . . . . . . . , , 450 Equipment $epaira - Adminlstration , . . . . . . . 3 Equipment Repalre - Civil Defense , . . . . . . . . L0� Equipment Repairs - BnginQering . . . . , . . . . . 272 $yuipment Rapairs ^ F�re pepartment . , . . . . . . 266� Equipment Rapaire - Llquor Stases . . . . . . . . . 48� Squ;lpment �palre - Park Department . . . . , , . , 873� Equipment Ftepalz� - P411ca Aepartment . . . . . . . L,ifi4 , � � t� � . City af Fridley 4T TM{ TOr OI iNR TN�Nt ��. �+•--� w«wv�irr aa4or«R�s av, MOfRC��M MMlCTiOM 0{�7 .-.` CITY NY.L /MDIt� 30A3.. W'1fP•7N0 � 1. Residential 2. Tvwnhousea 3. Muitiglgi Uwailings k. Reaidentl.al Garages . �, Residantial Alt,/Add 6. Goo�eraial 7, Induetrial 6, Coam, Tnd, A1C./Addn 9. Signa ' �0, Wrecking� Moving 1k. OtheXa 0 19�3 , � �� 1 , PROTECTIV� INSPECTION SECTION 0 THLY R�PORT A• Nu�abar ot Pelznits Isaued 8. �atip�ated Valuation of Permit� 1972 .nuarv ^ 0 �--•--•-•–�. l 0 2 -.--.-� 1 �� 0 Tazs YEax TO DATE 3 . �_ 6 0 � 1 LAST YEAR TO DATE 0 4 � A i z 0 2 1 �— 0 17 16 i7 16 Heating 22 30 22 Plumbing 8lectrical 8$ 34 88 34 ' TOTAI. i 71 $STIMATED VALUATIONS OF PERMIT9 ZSSUED 1. Aaeidential ' $ 73t952 ,S 0 $ 73�952 $ 0 2. Townhouses 3: Multiple pwellings 0 0 p 0 4, Residential Garages 0 2 193 5. Reaidential Alt./Addn 12�280 3,500 12 280 3 500 TOTAL RESIAENTIAi. 6,.Cou�ercial 7. Industrial $, Co�. Ind. Alr./Addn, Toxat, cora�., zrm. 9, Signe 10, Wrecking, Moving 11, OChers . . "2 99 401 86 232 99 4G1 � � $ Q � 0 .$.4Z_ $334, $47 � 17,000 0 17,000 �� .i�L�� J � TOTAL MISC. $ 6 430 $ 55 689 i�i i GRAND TOTAL VALUATIONS � 5n�,q37 S507 93' ty Golum� �rl Column �k2 Column :'r3 Colu:;u� ,t4 K I 0 City of Fridley �r ps ra w rNC T.u�� ••� �� COMWMIIY �[Y{LOrM[NI qV.' i MOT[CtiVt MV[CTIOM O�IT. � - � C/T' NI�LL I�IpL[v 6�07 � �.J ��t'�W'DNO � . LICENSE FEES . TYPE Blacktopping Sxeavating Gas Servicea General Contractor Seating House Moving & Wrecking Masonry Oil Heating Plaetering Roofing 9ign Erectors Miac. , TYPE Building Electrical Heating Ylumbing S1gne � PROTECTIVE INS�'ECTION SECTION MONTNLY REPORT C. Licenae Feea Collected D. Permit Feea Collected FEES NUL+iBER COLLECTED 11 p 14 210.00 � 510.00 111 2 775.W �+ 660.00 4 60.00 26 390.00 8 120.00 4 60.OU 2 30.00 9 225.00 0 p �T� ss.zos.00 d colu� �1 column �k2 1973 ],9]2 THj$ YEAR i.ACT VRAR TOTAL Column �1 ....:.......:-.... _�? .t= uvZ,...r� : a s t��a� f P:;, vuil.t7 S'v=+. �'�'.%. :£!�^ � Colu� }�2 l;olu�on �3 Column ��4 Colunn ,',k5 ; i � i �^"�_ �J .r- . . . � .. . i ��.. _ . . . .�... � City of Fridley `� . +r r�t ro� w r�� rN�w� "'�^� iOMMYMITY O[Yt�O►r�Nt DIV, � Marcenvi wvecrwM oc.r, � CIT1� a�� IIIiDt�r pai �...�.i 1�rsw•s�10 INSPECT1Qf�S BUILDING itough-ins: Footings; �'xamings and Reinspecttona Work Nat Ready or Itejecked 9top Woxk Posted Violations Cheaked Oomplainte 4hecked Aangeroue Bui,ldings 8igns Misoelianeoua 8lnals : l�esidex�tlal Finaia� Com, & Indu�txial Total Iaspecti�ana YexmtCe Iseued PLVt�ffiING & HEATING Rough-ins; Reinspectlons Work NoC Ready or Rejecead Dangerous Euild3ngs Mi,soellaneous Flnalsr Residential Finale; Com. & Industrial Tokal Inspactians Permlts Tsauecl ELECTRICAL Rough-ins: Reinspections: Work Not Keady or gejected Signs Dangeraus Build�nga S�rvlce Ipspecti.vns Finals� AesidenCial Finaler Com. & InduatxiaJ. �o�al Ipspections FarmiCs Is&ued PROTECTIVE INSPECTIOi� SECTION MONTHI.Y R�PORT k. MONTHI,y INSPECTIONS 1973 19)2 THIS YEAR LAST YEAR 1.k9 24 1.4. 4 0 3 49 m 21 � 4 56 lk9 24 14 4 0 3 49 I 94 i 21 10 4 0 I 56 � 88 lumn 34 Co lurt:n 88 Column afj I 34 � -- —J Culur.m !Sy I -- --- ' , `'PUBl..IC H:`.ARING MEETING OF THE CITY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 12, 1973 �� 1 -- - �� _ II , � ' i � � ' ' � i � The Publlc Hearing Meeting of the Fridley �ity Council was called to order at '3'� '�3 7:34 p.m.. February �2, 1973. by Mayor Liebl. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Liebi led the �ouncil and the Audience in saying the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Nee, Breider, Starwalt, Liebl, Utter. None Added to Agenda; Mike 0'Bannon, proposa� for City to receive Park land in lieu of sewer Assessment. Item number 13 on agenda. MOTION by Councilman Nee to adopt the agenda as amended. Seconded by Council- man Utter, Upon a voice vote, a)1 voting aye, Mayor Libel declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor liebl called on the City Engineer to present the proposed final plat. The City Engineer said there is a servi�ce station on the west portion of the property end a small shopping center on the east portfon. He added, the planning Commission had recommended approval of the final plat. Mayor Liebl asked if there were any questions or comments hy the members of the �ouncil, There was no response. Mayor Liebl asked if Lhere were any questions or comnents from those in the audience. There were no comments. MOTION by Councilman Breider to close the Public Hearing on the proposed final plat P,S, #72-08. Seconded by Councilman Utter, �pon a voice vote, all vo[ing aye, Mayor �iebl declared the public Hearing closed at 7:40 p.m. � ' , ' MOTFON by Councilman Utter to waive the reading of the Public H�aring Notice. ` Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. ' � ' . � . PU9LIC HEARING MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 1973 PAGE 3 ��+l.�C.«.( ...__ , , may wish to construct signs and commerclal buildings on.forty foot lots, and If_this proposal is approvad, it would be difficult to deny others the same right. He said he had not been speaking for the rest�of the members of the Planning Commissfon. - ' LJ ' , LJ Mayqr Llebl asked the �Ity En9i�eer ff thera had been some change in the State Code. The Cfty Engineer said yes, the new regutations state that signs must be constructed on lhdystrial or commercial property. Mr. Schmedeke said bafore the new regulations were passed, the �Ity would have been able to con- struct the sign without rezoning, The City Engineer agreed, this wouid have beon possible in the past. Mr. R. B. Redmond, 6208 70 Avenue N. Minneapolis, 55429� 5tated he was repre- senting the developer, Viewcon, and he was awara of the �hange in the state regulation. He said they would like to construct this slgn, and Viewcon had agread with Naegele to use one side of the sign to advertise. He sa(d the slgn would bo perpendi4ular to the freeway and he questboned whether it would throw any additfonal nofse to the south side of the freeway, Councilman Starwalt asked if the people in the area within 300 feet of the sign had been notified of Che Public Hearing. The City Engineer said all those within the 300 foot of the proposed property had bean notified. A member of the audience who said she was a resident of the area asked how many , people were notified. Mayor Liebl said there was only one owner on one side, and tha[ Is Viewcon. He added on the other s(de is the freeway, l 69�}, he added he did not believe there were any other prople 1nvolved. The resident repeated � her question and asked if any one lived within the 300 foot area? Mayor Liebl asked the Gity Engineer how many people live within the 300 foot area and how many people were notiffed? The City Engineer said there are homes on the south 5fda of the freeway that are within 300 feet of the proposed sign. He said , there were a total of flve people on the south side of the freeway and the dav�toper and his bank, Tha City Engineer read the names of those notified. Mr. Geor�a Pagnucco, 1$29 Berne Rd „ Frldley, Sa(d he believed there were othar considerations in this matter, He said the area people had purchased land because of the wooded view, the construction of the sign would datract from thls view and bring down the �alue of thefr pcoperty. He stated there is a�ready one sign in the area, Mayor I,ieb1 said the reason for the hearing was to determine ff there were any objectio�s to the construction of a sign simllar to the signs on Univarsity and East Rfver Road. Mayor Liebl asked if there were any more persons wlghing to commant. There was no response. MOTION 6y Councilman Utter to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by Gouncilman, Nee. Upon a voice vpte, all voting aye, Mayor Llebl declared the motion carrted unanimously, and the pu6lic Hearing closed at 7;59, � � � , , ' , , , � ' , ' � , � ' I� , ' , ' -��(,�dC, �--�— PUBLIC HHARING MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 1973 PAGE 5 Mayor Liebl sald 99% of the people in the area had stgned a petition request- ing tha area be zoned commercial, He added, there are some empty lots in the area and some older homes, 1{e s51d the people are trying to develop the area. He added, there is a 2Q,000 square foot requirement for cammercial Iots. He said thfs requirement Is enforced throughout Frfdley, Mr. l. A. Muggli, 3228 Dupont Ava. S., M(nneapolis, said he Was involved fn the matter as he owned soma land at the end of the block. Mr. Mugglf asked Councilman Utter if he was aware that one of the homes in the block did not have a basement. Mrs. Jensen said Mr, MugClj was talking about their home, Mr, Muggll )isted a number of objects that are currently occu- pying the alley such as garbage cans, trailers, and a disposal bunker. He said the alley is not ppen now. He stated he had friends in the area who had no obj�ction to the entire aj�ey beiny closed, but those who are obJecting to tRe clostng of the alley are the ones who have it clqsed at the present time. Mr. Muggli said he had made three trips through the area in the past few days, and assured the Council that there is no open alley. Mayor Lfebl asked Mr. Muggll If he was ln favor of the vacation? Mr. Muggli said he was in favor of vacating the entire alley,r�ot just one portion, leaving two short sections of ajley. The City Engfneer said the only portion of the alley being used is that por- tlon that is used for the apartment access to the parking lot the rest of the alley is completely closad, fenced, and impassible. Mr. Muggli asked if it was closed legally? Mayor Liebl said it is platted or City property, and it is not closed. He asked Mr. Muggli if he was opposed to the vacation of the alley owned by the Telephone Company, Mr, Muggll sald he was not opposed. Mr. Alan Jensen, said he would like to clarify what Mr. Muggli was talking about. He said •he did not believe the Telephone Company should construct a bullding in the middle of the block. He bel(eved they should start at one end or another. He said ha would not be opppsad if they built on the end of the block. He said the plan would leave them two alternatives. One; $ell ' thelr property as commerclal; and two, to sell as residential, He 5aid they have no guarantee that they can sell for residential 6ecause Lhey do not know ff they can finance through FHA or GI In a commercial area for a residential properzy. He aa(d he is faced wlth a problem, hfs home may become too small for his family, should he sell or axpand? Mr. Jensen said he could not afford to sell the home at a loss or with zero profit only because he is 6oxed in by comner- cial development. He added, two of the property owners in the area have been approached by Northwastern 8�11 and the Telephona Company has options to buy the(r land. Another home owner has been approached and has been asked to con- sider sellfng to them If they do decide to sell. Ha said he hoped the C�ty would not allow anyone to get squeezed in at the end of th� block. He said lt may and up to be two apartments and one home at the end of the block. PUB�IC HEARING MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12. 1973 . G:e�CccG PAGE 7 . Corartc#lman Utter askad if thore were a possibility of the Talephone Company acqui�ring mora land Irc tha area7 Mr. Dokken, of Northwestarn Bell Talephone Company, said there ts a definite possibillty that they may want to acquira more land in the next f�fty ta saventy-five years, but at the present tlme, tha Company has acqufred enough land to adequately provide for the buildi�g and any expenslon. H� sald he was unabla to say whether or not they would waRC-moro property In the future. He satd they d[d not havc any opttons on the property in the area,:fie :sald. they had Lhe first refusal on one home and tMey have talkad to two other partles stating ff they sell thefr land, the Telephona Company would I(ke to bid on It. H@ said if eny other home owners in 'the aroa would like to sel► ln the future, the T�lephone Company would laok very hard at the proposat, Mayor liebl asked if the peoplo would receive a commercial price for their proparty. The Telephone �qnpany representativa sald they would pay more than the resldantfal amount. Mayor Liebl asked ff whe� they purchase lots wfth houses on them, would they consider the fact,that tha land did have a house on It wd pay more for it. The Representatfva sald they had paid more for the homes than th�y were worth. Mr. Dokken aaid the building would be thexe fot qulta a few years, but they would not rapidly reach their capacity in epace, t,here �,,ou1d be limi.ted e�anaion. k�tyor L1eb1 said it had taken two years to razone the area to ca�aeroiai. Ha qaid thes# were objeatlona to ugqra8ing the areA by the property awners. He aaid, the plane would not be atfective i�medlately, it would take �ome yaars to devalop the axea. He eaid, thay were in a poeixlon where they muat aaloxoa the zoninq reeitrictiona oet by pravioua Council membere. He addedr ha did not eee much chance for futura Counail• changing the zoninq of the �rea. Mayos Liebl aeked Mr. taokken 1f the Telephone Caapany aouid give the prcperty ormera esome dsaurance that they would aoaaider gurchasinq their laad in the t'uture, Mr, Dokken said there may be a passibility, but he waq an employes and could not say far aura. Mr. Dokken said the Company i waa intezestnd in having enough property in the areq to take care of the axpaneion. He aaid thls would be, a large investmeat 1n buildinqs and materinls. , Alapor Lisbl asked iP thie waa the pre�ant plan, Mr. Dokken eaid it was. Ho �aent�ioned theze wae juet a hand fuil of empipxees ta be empioyed at the'''6Witching etatlon, and there was no nead for a large parking lot. Ma�yor L��y aoked if Mr. 8eka was preeent at the m�etlnq. There Was �o•reaponae, Mr, Dokken of the Telephone Canpany eaid bLr. Peka would no lonqer be ooncerned about the iaeua ae the,TOlapAone Companp had purchaaed hia'property. Councilman starwalt said he wauld like to alert the �aeople oP the area noC ko look for saane kind oE large proparty aettlement. , Matyor Iimbl �aid it would ba ppaaible for the remaining proparty owners p� fi.he �ad to caanbine their iote and receive VAF�BJIC@$ on the pmperty some time in the future. ' ' , �4� PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF FEHRUARY 12, 1973 Page 9 ' ' ' The City Attorney said it would be posaible to put some type of label on the aeseasment such as an interim assesament. The Mayor said the Engineerinq department and sta£f ahould make thie a tnatter of record. , � �J � ' , ' ' • , ' ' ' , Councilman Utter stressed that some people may not like the ponding areas. He mentioned a man he knew that put in his oom sawer and the City aseessed him for it. He asked if thia would be done in thia area eventually. The City Engineer said it would be difficult for one Council to foreaee what another Council is going to do. Mayor L1eb1 asked if the ponding portion of the area was zoned R-3 or R-17 The City Engineer pointed the areas out on a map showing the ponding areas as bainq in both types of zoning. Courtcilman Starwalt streased the need to inform the people of the concept being used and if they want a change ten years from now, what it would involve. Councilman sreider said the lake ie in existance at the present time. He asked the City Engineer if there are any lots abutting the lake at the present time. The City Engineer said there were. Mayor Liebl liated the various aeses�nent charges for each individual in the area, statinq they may pay as much as $2,600.00. He said if the City would assess them again in five yeare, there would be trouble. Councilman Breider said the people in the area would be aware of the ponding and would want to purchase land in auch an area. He said if they do enjoy this type of area they would have to keep the aewer aystem as it is now being planned. He added, thia is what the people oE the area want. Councllman Starwalt said aome people have very short memoriea and they may forget sometime in the future that thie was not a fu11 system. Councilman Breider asked Councilman Starwalt if he was in favor of a closed storm aeWer eystem. Councilman Starwalt said no. The City Enqineer said all the sales officea ehow the.pondinq areas. An individual could not come back and aay he did not like the area, as it is shown this way on all the mape. A reprasentative from Viewcon eaid there ie a$1,200.00 to $1,500.00 ;premium on the lota which abut the ponding areas. Mayor L1eb1 said �the City had isaued a building permit to the developer and the area jehould be developed and there ehould be an a8equate amount of money set {aeide Por the project. After the developer has completed his work 'in the area, said Mayor Liebl, he will move on and the City will bear �the brunt of the problem, The Viewcon Representative said the single £amily lots are without aeeesements becausa thay do not know the amount of the assesament and the money wae put into eacrow. CounciJ.man Nee asked the poseibi�lity of New Srig�ton some day being responsible to the City of Frldl�ey. He said, co�ld it be determined that one area would be in one part of the eystem a»d �nother in another area. The City Engineer sald the City did have aome reeponsibllity to New Brighton. He added, it would be poeaible to call part of the syatem lateral and some of it as main interception. , ICOUnci].man Utter asked if it would be ppasible to check into the minutes of a previaua meetinq. He said, he racqlled there had been a per lot asras+�ment eatdbll�hed �or t,he area, The city Engineer said th�,� w�a „rr�.,„ , . � . . . . � m :�er�+�.?P.'., _ . .. .. 1 .IYF.ti�f � , f•l,..ryt .r'r e'.`-5 r�� , �' ' ' ' � ' ' ' ' ' ��PUBLIC HEFIRING MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 1973 �.oLeC�� — Page 11 The City Engineer said the plow may be used for digging, minoz excavation, alley anow plowinq, the clearing of drainage ditches, and the plowing of parking areas. The City Enqineer said Austy &ilseth and Les Chesney had signed a canmunication statinq their viewa on the proposed plow. 'Phe City Enqineer said Mr. S1laeth as well as the street foreman were present. Mayor Liebl said, the City must plow the sidewalka as they have agreed to do so. He asked Mr. Silseth if the proposed plow was track driven? Mr. Silseth said it was on a rubber track. Mr. Sileeth said with light equipment, they can plow through the month of December without much difficulty. He added, ,7anuary through the end of the winter month is the problem'time. Mr. Silseth said there is no place to put the accumulated snow. He added, the propoaed plow is no miracle machine, if the snow were four feet high, it would not do the job either. He added, he believed with a normal snow fall, this would be a good machine. Councilman Utter said he would lilce to add a few more worde. xe said he had talked with Mr. Chesney, and Mr. Chesney had indicated the plow to be too expensive. Councilman Utter said that for the past two years the City had contracted the anow removal from the sidewalks for $G00.00 per year. He said for two years, the project had cost only $500.00, and he could not see puttinq $9,000.00 into thls machine. He said the life expectancy.of the plow was expected to be ten to fifteen years. Councilman Utter asked which of the ctatements in the communication ' were made by Mr. Chesney? He said it was unpoasible to determine which of the men were for the proposal and which was opposed. He said their are two siqnatures and many statements. , �I ' ' ' �7 The City Manager said a set amount had been budqeted for a snow plow for the purpose of clearing the sidewalka. At this time, he added, the estimates were inaccurate and there has,been a coat eacalation. The City Manager said the $6,000.00 in the budget was not what the public works director had in mind to purchase a plow. He added, the job could not be done as it is presently being done. He said, the public works department would like to coanplete the job adequately in the least possible time. He added, the present job ia not what they would like to see continue, if the Council believes it is adequate, there would be no need to purchase srly equipment. Counciltnan Breider asked what was to be done with the high bankc of snow? Mr, olson said they did have a Cub that operates at the top speed of five miles per hour and it ia not able to plow the snow at this rate of speed. He added, this speed can be obtained on dry pavement, not while plowing. He said, the proposed Bombardier will operate up to 25 miles per hour enablinq it to move tha snow farther from the aidewalks and the banka will not build up so high. With a faster m�chine, he said, the snow can be thrown off the plow. ' ' Councilman Starwalt asked where the seven miles oi aidewalk were.locatad and qtleptioned how it caneabout that the City is responsible for the plowinq of the si�lewalkq7 �'he City Engineer said the City had worked ' yit#i th� &chooj. Bpard in the areas were th�re �.s heavy traffic and the childzen must wa�k to schoo�. He said at this time the le�gth o£ sidewalks � 1 ' , ' PU�I.IC HEARING MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 1973 Seconded by Councilman Utter, Upon a voica vote, all voting aye, Msyor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously. UPON�A VOICE VOTE, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the original motion carried unani.mouely. , '.� DISCU9SION REGAF2DING PROPOSAL FOR FRIDLEY VOLUNTEER FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION: �� Page 13 The City Manager said a proposal had been submitted to himselt and the ' Council by the Fridley Firemen's Retirement Plan Association. He said he ha�d met with Idr. Robert Aldrich and membere of the Aasociation and he waa not prepared to reach any concluaiona at the preaent time. The City , Manager said Mr. Aldrich requeatad the Council receive the c�unications �t the preeent time. ' Mayor Liebl said there was a letter stating Che certain chanqes and listing the coste, also a letter from Stennes and Aasociatea, dated Aecember 21, 1973. Mayor Liebl suggeated the Council meet with Mr. Aldrich and a delegation £rom the Fire Department and discusa tha ways ' and mesns of a possible solution. Mayor Liebl c�ended the Fire Department as being the most efficient Department financially, adding they provide many servicea. , , The C1ty Manager said he would like to pureue his negotiations with the Pension Assoiation as�d if no decision is reached, the Council could meet with the members and he would make recoAnnendations to the Council at that time. He auggested negotiations such as set up with the Police Pension Association. , MOTTON by Councilman Utter to receive the cou�unicatlons. Seconded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declazed the motion carried unanimously. ' , ' ' ' � ' Mr. Robert Aldrich, Penaion Asaociation, addreasad the Council. He eaid the Association was not aboyt to resolve the plan that night, but he asked if he miqht preaent the Council with some additional information. He atatedr the plan had besn qo�pletely funded according to the Guidlinee Act of 1964. He said it tvould be nice to spend six mantha on the plan, but•time did not allow thi9 as it must be aubmitted to the legislature as a b111 within the preaent sesaion. He said he agreed with Mr. Davia in that they should have additional meetings with Mr. Davis and his staff. MOMION by Councilman Breider to authprize the adminiatration to meet with the Pension Aasociation to•determine s poaqible plan and return to the Council wlth a plan if it is obtained by the first meatinq in March. Seconded by Councilman Nee. Mayor Liebl asked the City Manager if it would be poeeible to preaent the Council with a plan by the fixst meetinq in March7 The City Manager said it would be posaible. � Ibagor Liebi aqked the City Attorney if he could psepare the bill to be �ul�nitted to the legislature within a few dayQ after the Council approvsl ' , ' ' ' ' , 1 , � �� PUBLIC HEARIN6 MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 1973 PAGE 15 I / MOTION by Councilman Breider to authorize the City Manager or the �ity Engineer to serve as witnesses for the Metro Council In support of their position. Seconded by Gouncilman Nee. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor �iebl declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by �ouncilman Nee to Utter. �po� a voice vote, carried u:animously. receive the communication. Seconded by Gounc(Imen ali voting aye, Mayor Llebl declared the motfon Mayor Liebl called on Mr, Mike 0'Bannon to presant his proposal to the Council. Mr. 0'Bannon addressed the �ouncil saying he had met with the City Manager and the City �ngineer the previous week and had presented his proposal to them at that tinie, He said, his proposai was to dedicate property to the City, as park land in lieu of storm sewer assessments. Mr. 0'Bannon said he had been told that the assessments in his second addition would be approximately $$00.00 per 1ot and they had previously �iiswssed assess- ments of $300.00 for the lots in Innsbruck. He said, he did not think he was bejng treated equally, ' Mr. 0'Bannon explained the area to be about two and a half acres with a big catch hole basin. He said, there were about seven lots included in the area and most of those lots are worth approximately $3,000.00 before the utilities ' installation. He said the total amount of the area would be about $21,000.00 and he was willing to deed the land to the �ity in lieu of future storm sewer assessments in the area, plus the City paying him $S,OOO.00 for the property. ' Mayor Liebl said he be�ieved the Second Ward Councilman should take a look at the area, He asked, as this procedure has not been followed in the past, how could the �ity not assess for a storm sewer7 Mr, p'gannon suggested ' ajlowing him an $800.00 credit per lot. Mayor Liebl said he did not know if the City could do this. Mayor Liebl asked if it would be possible for Mr, 0'Bannon to give the Ci[y land for money? ' ' ' ' , 7he City Engineer said the storm sewer in the �nnsbruck North development was partially constructed by Viewcon, this is the reason for the assessments being lower. Mr. 0'Bannon said he lives in Marion Hills, and he was asses5ed $100.00 for a storm sewer, and along came Columbia Heights and put in a dam, and fie was assessed twice, Mr. 0'Bannon added, there is no project designation in this area, he said, he was only asking for some consideration. Mayor Liebl said he would like the Ward Councflman to look at the land. He sa7d, he did not believe they could settle the ftem that evening. � ,` PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF PEBRUARY 12, 1973 G�L�t� PAGE 17 Councilman Starwalt asked where the seven lots were. Mr. 0'Bannon and the members of the Council discussed the location of the lots at the map. Mr. 0'Bannon said he would give the City two and a half acres and a 25 foot easeme�t for a road. Ha added, this area would make a very nice neighborhood park. Councilrr�an Starwalt asked Mr, 0'Bannon what work was to be started the follow- ing Monday that would force the Council to approve or deny the proposal before that time. Mr. 0'Bannon said there was no work to be done on the proposed area, he added, he wanted to do some work on the other areas before the road restric- tions were in force. Mayor Liebl said he had no obJections to the plan, but feared setting a preci- dent. He asked if the City would be required to mainta(n the area, and Mr. 0'Bannon said yes, this is why he had proposed giving the City an access. Mayor Liebl asked what other elements would have to be consldered in the draining. Mr. 0'Bannon said there is a possibility the drainage area could be filled by silting. The City Engineer said if the City was thinking of having a ponding system to take care of the drainage, this plan would take care of the surround(ng area. He said, any property that would be drained into the pond would not be part of the overall assessed project. The pond will take care of the drainage and there would be no future project in that area, he added, He said, then the individuals in the area would only be assessed the difference. Mayor Liebl suggested a letter be drawn up protecting the Clty so the developer or property owners will not make demands in the future, The City Attorney agreed, there should be a detailed list of obligations between the City and the property owners. Mr. 0'Bannon suggested the easements be placed in the agree- ment. The City Attorney asked Mr. 0'gannon if on closing he would deliver warrantee of deeds? Mr. 0'Bannon said yes. Councilman Utter said there is no road into the area at the present time, Mr. ' 0'Bannon said he would put a road into the area and bulidoze that portion of the land at the same time a�lowing the City access. He added, he could not develop the road until the Chies property is developed. , ■ 1 ' l l ' ' i Mayor Liebl asked if the City would be left holding the bag after the land is � developed. He added, what guarantee would the C�ty have that the people would @ not demand a storm sewer project? He asked, if it were possible to incorporate f this into the agreementl Councilman Utter asked if the drainage area is visidle to [he entire area? Mr, 0'Bannon said it can only be seen from one lot. Councilman Utter asked how the ch(Idren would get 'rnto the park area? Would they have to go through someone else's property, he questioned. Councilman Starwalt suggested Mr. 0'Bannon outline fn detail what the proposals on the plan wou)d be in wrlting and as soon as possible, rye said he did not believe he was prepared to act,on the proposal at the present time, , . �.� .-� �.. t t ' ' ' ' ' ' ' PUBIit HEARING MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 1973 PAGE 19 �� Mayor Liebl asked the C�ty Attorney if It is possible to construct home in an area zoned P-D. The C(ty Attorney said it was possible. Mayor Liebl asked the Ward Councilman Breider if he had any objections to the proposed zoning change and residential area? Councilman Breider said he was all for property in that area. Mayor Liebl suggested Mr. Rotter work with the administration and come back to the Council for approval of the plan at the next meeting, Gouncilman Nee said he believed the plan a good one, The �ity Attorney said there should be some sort ot formal communication pursuant to the Ordinance, if single family dwellings are to be placed on the plats of land. MOTION by Councilman Nee to permit construction of single family dwellings on lot 4, Block 2, Bourdeaux's Spring Brook Addition, and lot 9, Block 2, Bourdeaux's Spring Brook Addition, subject to approval by the Inspection Department; stipu- lating further constructlon subject to a complete plan being submit[ed on the develppment plan and approved prior to any further construction. SeGOnded by Councilman Breider. Upon a voice vote, Lfebl, Nee, greider, Startwalt voting aye, Utte� abstaining, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried. MOTION by Councilman Nee to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Star- ' wajt. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Liebl declared the motion carried unanimously and the Publlc Hearing Meeting of February 12, 197j adjourned at 11:30 p.m. ' ' i 0 � ' ' ' ' Respectfully submitted, � � .__' ��...-c� �✓ ii:.-t. f.� Patricia Ellis Secretary to the City Gouncil Frank G. Liebl, Mayor Preliminary Assessment Estimate PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT Sanitary Sewer, 4Jater, and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No, 112 february 12, 1973 7 � ' CITY OF FRIDLEY IPRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROIL ' SANITARY SEWER, WATE�2, ANO STDRM SEWER IMPROUEMENT PROJECT N0, 112 ' ' I N D E X IPAGE , 1 Memorandum 2 Notice of Hearing / 3 Map of Water Main Area k Map of Sanitary Sewer Area ' S Map of Storm Sewer Area ' 6 Preiiminary Estimate of Assessments 7 Names and Addresses of Property Owners to Whom Notices ' Were Sent ' , , , ' ' t ' ' y-� ," t ' CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDUM ' T0: GERALD R. DAYIS, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR , SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL - SANITARY SEWER, WATER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 112 ' DATE: JANUARY 31, 1973 ' � , � Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer I�rovement Project No. 112 involves the area in the Innsbruck North Second Addition. The plat has not been filed as of this date. We have made an estimate of a cost per lot for the water, sewer and storm sewer improvement. It has been requested by the developer that the cost 6e put on a per lot basis rather than a front foot or square foot basis. WATER - The estimated total cost is $41,775.79. LATEt�. The estimated cost per lot is $1,129.08. SANITARY SEWER - The estimated total cost is $37,473.60. �� The estimated cost per lot is $1,012.80. ' STORM SEWER - � , li ' ' � � � The estimated total cost is $11,965.63. The estimated cost per lot is $323.40. C��2 � C ' . , ' , ' ' ' � , � , ' OFFICrAL PUBLICATION CITY OF FRIDLEY . (S�IBIT AJ .NOTICE OP HEJ,RZNG ON i.�LoROVPMENTS� PROJECT A!12? . WflEREAS, the City Council of the Citg of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, has deemed it expedient to receive evidence pertaining to the improvements hereinafter described. y-,�°� � AOW. TIiEREFORE, NOTZCE IS SEREBY GIVEN THAT an the 12th day of Febrvar , 1973 at 7:30 o'cSock P.M. the Citg Council wi11 meet at the City HaZ1 in said City, and wi11 at said time and place hear a11 parties tnterested in said improvements in whole or in part. The general nature of the improvements is the rnnstruction (in the Iands and streets noted below) of the following improvements, to-wit: CONSTRUCTION ITEM Water mains, sanitary sewer, Zaterals and service connections, storm sewer and appurtenances, and tenporary paving. Innsbruck North Second Addition East Danribe Road West Danube Road ESTZASATED COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9.Z�225.02 ZHHAT THE AREA PF.OPOSED 20 BE ASSESSED FOR SAID Zd�ROVEMENTS ZS AS FOLLO[7S: For Construction Item above Al2 of the Zand abvtting ¢aon said streets named above and a11 lands within, adjacent and abvtting thereto. AZZ of said Zand to be assessed proportionately according to the benefits received by such i�provem.ents. ' That should tire Council nroceed witl: said imnrovements they wi11 conside* each separate i�;provenents, except as herea;:ter otherwise orovide3 by the Council a11 vnder tke iolZowing authority, to-wit: :finnesota Statates ' 1961, Chapter 429 and laws amendatory tnereof, and in conforr.ti.tg :oith the City Charter. p � ' DATED THIS 2211D DAY OF .7z"�,'Apv , 1973, BY ORDER OF TXE CZTY COliilCli. Publish: Januarg 31, 1973 FebrLary 7, 1973 MAYOR - i'?AiJK G. ;.,ii3;, � � � �U� � ��_ r = , �% ! , .-.... ��. � F`U T` U f� E , ` � I -. �/ ---�=� . _ � WATER MAI�d PROJECT #112 �—i.-- . i` t' •• _ �� -i --•----- i Proposed i� � Fir� i / ---_� S t � 12.• ? ffd r�. I ......�s � ; I'4 ' � �4A�� / t,�I) Single b � ' . �? . ----�_ a� F�,� � , ' � r �Y �O js �� -. i . Q � ;' . / ' t O � Q 1 � � � , . ' � �.�� . _��. 1 � � � ��a Z � � i "~ A r .�_..r . .�_>. -: .. .. _.:_�: .. __ ' l—r--� ��, . , . � �� i.. � '::;ti �, � / � :' � � � ;.- - � � �r _�' % �y Q"� �. �,� �`�.-.�� ' 3 . � �%� 4'� `V . � � ..',S _ d � � . C7 �; � . � J4ty � L, j � �/ ] ! , �- i f-. ,ti `� � M ' \\ ' �� l! � l �� i �� - �� Proposed liater �lain Proposed Hydrant , Proposed Valve i . � Existing P�ater �fain [- . f ! � Existing L'alve k � I Existing �'alve and i•fanhole �� ( Existing Hydrant � : � 'J,~ �� i / " � G3 � „ I �a2 0 � � � �vtL�s- vt�a`.�� ... �tl, / /� ,�' ! ; .� � � o�m:.^. � � -..� SCaLE 1" = 100' �HEET 1 Or 3 '_ �„�1 ` ` , i k� 1_�' f f � : ' C__._I � ' F' U T U R E �"'------; 1__ • , � � ` � � - ' ` i SAPJITARY SE4!ER PROJECT #112 �'�� 1, � � ; , �� -1 [: o T � � �� ' ` . ��' f � � � � �� j � � � � , Proposed + ; Firsp � � . q d�, �.Y: ' ,��on c � �% �', � ; � , � �-� .�a� Sin91e s ; 8 � ,� , ;�- � � �--� i Fp�f �Y � � ;, f, � i' f r ' C � ;—�: ot , Q ; s. Q ;: 0 , 1 � >; / -_�� ` ` � w // � . �.i�' . \ M1l / i \ o • � ` �/1 .� Q� .�'�J . . � . . � S J ,: F �� , : � � � F U T U; � 3 � �� o,• %' �I. . ; �e�.' j /C`� ��I • q.�� r;� ' ,-;. ` O J�J � � ,r / r'�` O�%` �� 4� o t { ; c n �1 `,'=,�� 3�� \ % '�"�� 9 �1 \� L f.4y �J � `, `� f _, (aj \ � �, %i _ � ��. �+ ��v�*� . 44�� Q� . y � , � \. � � � y . - . . . ' � � ! `' <` �e 4 iI � �� t ��y ` v _ ' 7, . ♦ \ I - . � *.ttt`ts \ � � . � J � � � ; � � Proposed Sei:�er "� Proposed �lanhole �p Existing Se��er � '°e� Existing Afanhoie _I °�-. J f �, a �`,, r {.,,_� , ; f :. �"�re�+�t� i� � � r"II�7 . SCALE 1" = 100' i �• 1r � ; �J . � � '� SHEET 2 OF 3 . � �� II{AIi�1 • � ��:: �= F:UT�V � � . _.,\` , � / • � �,c�.V t + �> ! �` ��j� ' , % , �/'tiv''�� . �� . � � � ; �;,, STORM SE4lER PROJECT #112 �> I � �Proposed First qdd `'-;,,�' � �t � � �� /�� r � ge � ; �' �i $in r - t� '�� F°�T� y 1 - .� � � , � ��ts � ,. � �--�� , A � ! � ° -- � ,, �: , a <; _� I i w_ , U �i z, �\ �s•. ,. ; � i . z I a _1._,a � S � �, ; �/ �� °� __.__-�_____. � F ; �J c i.��' � ��` �4 ,' ( . j �- C '� � � I , � �1 r _ �,� ,\ � i�•. ��, -• t ,�� o - - � , ��J� � � ' �$„ r ` � �`� o � �, . �, , � , � � ., � -� � ' . / �. � - ,;;►a,t� w �: �,:J Proposed Storm Se�ver �.I.� , � �4dr+ � Existing Storm Sewer � � 2 I" =fr,., : f � �`?f' � � i _ '_ � z' � " � ' � , j ;,: . - I � � � i + � SCALE 1" = 100' r i � _ � � f_ SHEET 3 OF 3 F� j ' r f. I � i r ,' . 1 ,�` _ . � ° (�C1/,� . ,s ' CITY OF FRIDLEY i'i J� tPRELIMItiARY ASSESSMENT ROLL � SANITARY SEWER; WATER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROV.MENT PRDJECT N0, I12 , 1�1TER LATERAL , Estimated Tota1 Cost -- $41�775.79 ' Estimated Cost Per Lot -- $1,129.08 per Lot SEWER LATERAL ' Esttmated Totai Cost -- $37,473.60 Estimated Cost Per Lot -- $1,012.80 per Lot , STORM SE'dER ' EsLimated Totai Cost -- $11�9b5e63 Estimated Cost Per Lot -- $323040 per Lot 1 , ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ' , C;[�or�C�G, v.2- �a��CITY OF FRI DLEY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL Sanitary Sewer, Water, and Storm Sewer Improvement Proiect No 112 L�a1 Description Innsbruck North 2nd Addition (Atl Lots -- Residentiat) Name and Address Darrel Ae Farr Developnent Corporation 5901 BrooklyR 8oulevard Minneapolis� Minnesota 55429