The URL can be used to link to this page

05/14/1973 PH - 5787, 1 ' I ' 1 , . ' , ' . ' 1 ' I ' ' I � , � , ' ' ' , 0 ��eti�ni��t Assess�aent Estiwst� rUBLIC MEARING ON IMPROVEMENT Street Ia�ovement Project tT. 1913•t and ST. 1973-2 (ndd. �to. 2) Mar t4, 1913 . i f ' ' CITI� OF FRI DLEY ' h��li�ira�r Assessaient Esti�at� ISTR��T IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 19�3-1 ANO ST. 1973•Z (i400ENaM N0. 2) • ��i �� i �r�iwi��i i ��.�� , I N D E X '�AGE . , i Memor�ndua► 2 b 3 Notice of Haarin� � ' 4 Map of 68th Aw�ue and 7th St�eet Area 5- 1 Prelimina�y Estiaiate of Assessae�Ls for 68th Aw�ue and ' S�tve�th St�eet Area 8� Map of blst Avenue, Sta�lite Bouteva�d, aed Syiva� �a�ne Area I9 i10 Prelia�i�a�y Estimate of Assessnients fo� 61st Avenue, Starlit� ' Saulevard, a�d Srlvan Lane Area ' 11 Map of lkKinley St�eet Area i� �retia�ina�r Estiniate of Street Assess�aents fo� McKinfey Street � Area ' 13 . Preliminarr fstimate ot Water a�d Sw+e� Asssss�nents fo► ' NcKinley Street Area 14•37 Na�ues and Addresses of Prope�ty Owne�s to Whan Notices Wrere ' Sent . . . , . ' . � , � ' - ' . I . ' MEMQ T0; 6ERA�0 Ro OAVIS, GITY MANAGER� AND CITY COUNC�L FROMt NARVIN C. �RUNSEL�, fINANCE OIRECTOR ' SIJlIJEGTt IMPRpYEMENT FO�ARIN6 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 ANO ST. 1973�x (AOOENOUM N0. 2)' t1ATE: M�►Y 1, 1973 On the attached pages are the prelia�inary estimates of the assessnients fo� the ST• 1973-1 and ST. 197�-2 (Addendum No. 2) Street Improvement Projects. These estimatas a�e e�ot intended to be �aximum anwunts, but ��e the best esti�natss ot the cost of the imp�ovanent projects based on the engineer�s cu��ent sstia�tG of the eosts. f'� brief explanation of each street foltowss RI s TO 7TH STRE AVENU£ (NSAS) . �he esti�ated assessn�ent fo� f�ont footage is S11.29 per fronL foot. The �stiwated assessa+snt for side yard is $1.96 pe� foot. ' 61ST AVEMJEs STARLITE BOUI�VARO TO NAIN STREET (MSAS) The �stf�t�d assessn�ent for front footage is 510.97 pe� f�ont foot. The estfwated assessment for side yard is $1.61 per foot. MCKINLEY STRE£T: 7STH AVENUE TO LAKESIOE ROAO St�eet .._�.._.... The es�ioatad assessaient fo� f�ont footage is 515.62 per front foot. •ihe esti�tetd :ssessment fo� sids ra�d is $2.44 per foot. Wattr and Sewer lines Thp estiwaxed assessme�R fo� Nater is s13.27 pe� fror�t foot. The �:ti�ted Assessme�t for sew�e� 1s �13.26 pe� front foot. , , I � _ � / "' •� , ' � � . . � � " � : � . OFFICIAL PUBLICATIQN CITX OF FRIDLEY (EXHIBIT A) NOrPICE OF I�ARING ON IMPROVEMENTS ST'REET' �MPROVEMENT PRQJEGT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2, ADDEIVDUM #2 ' WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley,Anoka County, Minnesota, has deemed it expedient to receive evidence pertaining to the in�rovements hereinafter described. �. � NOW, THE1tEFORE, NOTICE IS E�REBY GIVEN THAT on the 14tj� day of , 1973 at 7:3Q o'clock P.bi. the City Council will meet at , e City Hall in said City, arid will at said time and place hear all parties interest�d in said improvements in whole or in part. � ' ' I ' I ' The general nature of the improvements is the construction (in the lands and strests noted be1Qw) of the following improvements, to-wit: O(JNSTRUGTIQN ITEM; Street imprqyem�nts, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix �ituminous nat, concxe�e curb and gutter, storm sewer system, watex and�sanitary sewear se�vi.ces and othex facilities. A._Streets Un�proiect St. 1973-1 , S lvan Lane: Y Starlite Boulevard to J�piter Drive � 68th Avenue: Rice Creek Terxaee t4 7th Street ath Sxxest: 67th Avenue to 68th Avenue McIC3.�nley Street: 75th Avenue to Lakeside Road B. Streets Und�r Project St._ 1973-2 (MSAS) blst , pv�enue ; Starlite 8oulevard: 7th Strea�k: Staxlite Boulev�rd to blain Street blst Avenue to Sylyan Lane Mississippi Street to 67th Avenue ESTZMATEDCOST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 87,977. SO � THAT TtiE AR�A PRQPQSEA TO B� ASSESSED FOR SAID II�ROVEMENTS IS AS FOLLQWS: ForGonst�uction Item above _________________________.._-_-_--_-_-__ All o£ the l.ands abutting upon said streets named above and all lands w�.th3n, adjaGent and abutting thereto. Ail a£ said land to b� assessed proportionately according to th� k►onefit.� received by such improvement. � � ' r -No�ia� oi Heaxing � S�. 197�3-1 � 2 Addendum #2 pag� 3 . Th+�t �hculd the Council proceed with said improvements they will consider e�A�h separate im�rovemen�ts, except as hereafter otherwise provided by the Cuwlc.i.1 al� under the followin� authority, to-wi.t: Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chagter 42� and laws amendatory thereof, and in conformity with the • City �harte�c. , AATED THIS 2� DAY OF APril � 1973, BY ORDER 0� THE CITY COUNCIL. FUBLISH: ppril 25, 1973 May 2, 1973 . � 0 , MAYOR - FRANK G. LIEBL � A ; :� ��. 1: ��a ..� w �� /i 5 ---�A�.� -----�� a.,.� . . )I 7 ;;�. � _,� ., �: ; � t. , :5:� �?6;� .� . .. _:: m . NT�'RY ME .t�e::� o.,. Ke.s : �' } s f � G�REEfr � � a �i � • ► ,m 7'C/�'RA CE 6 : � .��,� �, � F''L A T 3 �/ � �' A'i 17 /O i li � 5 , � � ( � � ' � ' B 7 I s � � � !c� I I _ I i.r/ .r/i..r F.. : r.�• y---'S�iATE -AIR NIGHWAY NQ. 6 '�,�,r'' — . c�tir£A� — - - - -- Mrssissi'�Pt.,,.,S7REET - - ••. ST. 1973-1 and ST. 1973-� (Addend� No. 2) q � � �� Pr�l � b6th Averwe ana �sv�nth St�cet F�ront �'oot Rate -- S11.29 Side Street Rato -- $1.96 ., � . , 0 CITY OF FRIDLEY PRECIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROtL ' S'Fft�ET IMPRQVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1 2 ADOENOUM NO. 2 � _,� � �. _..� 9,�3-1 aNO sT. 1913- t _� 6$TM AYENUE: RICE CREEK TERRACE TQ 7Tr1 STREET ' %TH STRE�Ts 67TM AVEM1� TO 68Tl1 AVENUE �Ti1 STREETs MISSISSIPP� STREET TO 61TH AVENUE (MSAS) , I.�GAL CESCRIPTIGN FRONT ST. FRONT ST. SIOE ST. SIDE ST. FOOT� ASSE�SSMEN_T FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT I N Pa�ce OQ . 1;0 � S 294.00 ' RECE CRE�K TERRACE PLAT 1 AOOITION �0� BLOCK . � �� - , l00 196.00 "� 1 . 100 196.00 � 1 f00 196.00 9 1 100 196.00. , 10 1(1�3 S) 100 S 1,129.00 100 196.00 1 - Z(1/3 S) 100 1,129.00 too 196.00 , 2 2 � too l96.00 � 2 100 1 �b,00 P�vof 4 2�p,27a) 25 49.00 � Pt.pf 4 2 iE•7S') . 7S . 147.00 � 2 l00 196.00 . . ' b 2 100 19b,.00 ' ' '� ,. RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2 ADDITIOM S 1 • 6 t (1/3 Si SQ t 2 (t/3 s) So zs�. ot� 3 2( P. t oo � ►c.of 3 a 4 2 tP.�3a� Pt.of 4� S 2( P.16o ) . Pt.of � 2 (P.180) Pt•af 5 � � 2 (P.21o) ? � Pt.of � x ( PR244 ) I��.af � � ( P.�%! ) Pt,af $ 8 g 2 (P.29p) . t . 3 t1/3 s) so 2 � � S Pt.of k� t P.530 i Pt.aF 4 � � 3 tP.�SO) rt.o�` � 6 � � (P•57p� Pt.o� 6 � 1 3 �P.590) Nt,o�F i i 8 3( P.6o4 ) ' 11.1�� e�f 8 � (P.b10) 564.50 S�.So S6�►.SO 83 83 83 7S 80 tto $0 S l00 100 to 44 (Pt.) 75 75 1Q� 1� 1S 100 ao 1S 162.68 162.68 162.68 147.00 156.�0 ZiS.bO iS6.8o 9.80 196.00 146.00 19.60 78040 147.00 147.00 ZQS.8A 147.00 14�,00 196.00 iS6.80 z9.40 ' , � TOTAL ESTIMATEO COST $ 294.00 196.00 196.00 196.00 19b.00 1,325•00 1,325•�0 196•00 196.00 49.00 147.00 196.00 i96.00 162.68 162.68 727.18 111.So 1S6.8Q z�s.6o 156.80 9.80 196.00 19b.A0 19.60 �a.�+o 711.50 147.Op 20�.80 147.OQ 14y.o� 196.00 . 1S6.8Q ��.�Ki � Ct TY �F �:? � :l� i;Y �REIIKi►iAK�' �s��SS�i�NT ROIt (a STREfT IM'PR01tEMENT PRdJECi ST. t973-i ANO ST. 1973-2 (ADOENOUM N0. 2j 68TH AVENEJE: RICE CREEK TERRACE TO 7T11 STREE7 7TN STREE7x 67TH AUENi1E TO 68TH AYE1�1E 7TH STREETs MISSISSIPPI StREET TO 67TH AVENUE {MSAS) LEGAL OESCRIPTION FRONT ST. f'RONT ST. SIDE ST. SIDE ST. TOTAL ESTIMATED LOT BLOCK FOOTAGE l�SSESSMENT �'OG�t'AG£ ASSESSMENT COST RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2 At�OITI�N Gontinued} �+ ^ $3 S 162.68 $ 162.6$ S 4 83 ) 62.68 162.68 6 4(1/3 S) SO $ Sb�+.50 83 162.68 727.18 R'�PaRRANfaF�1ENT OF LOT'S 1-3 BIOC�C 1, AND L07S 1-3 BLOCK 4, RICE CREf.K TERRr10E Pt.AT 2 � P• 20 , 0 i 5�.��' 15�.�0 � (P. 40) 8a t56.8o tSb.8o 3(P. 60) 80 156080 156.80 �t.of 4(P. 75) 77 150.92 150�92 Pt.of 4 S S(P. 90) 83 i62.b8 162.68 6 (P. 120) ''80 155.80 iSbo8o RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 3 ADOITIflN 1 �T+�1�ST'TS 508.05 9� 2 4 80 3 4 40(Pt.) 8 5� 9 S 10 5 ii 5 12 S 13 S 14 5 15 S (1/3 S) 45 RICE CREEK TERRACE PIAT 4 AOOITION 1 3 2 � 3 3� 4 3 S 3 , 6 3 (1/3 s) �+S 7 3 (1/3 s� 45 8 � 9 3 10 . 3 'I , 1 � (FSl/3 S) 134 , +� � 8S 3 S TS � , 4 S • 7S S S 7S � 508.05 508.05 508.05 1,512.86 959.65 846.75 846.75 846.75 48(Pt.) 7S 15 75 75 ' 80 80 80 15 75 15 75 75 75 100 100 100 100 $9 8S 75 7S 7S. 176.40 156.80 78.40 94.08 147.00 t47.o0 147.00 147,0� 1 S L6.80 �SOs�� 156080 147.00 147.00 i47.00 147.00 147.00 147.00 i96.03 19b.�o 196.00 196000 174.44 166.60 141.00 147.00 147.OQ 684.45 156.80 78040 94.08 147.40 147�40 147.0� � �+7.ao 156.80 156.80 6bt►.85 147.00 147.00 147.�0 t47.00 147.00 65S.oS 704.05 19b.�0 i9bo00 196.00 1, �7.30 1,126.a5 993.75 993.75 993.75 . 0 CITIr OF FRIOLEY PREI.IMI Nl1RY ASSESSMENT ROLL I STREET IMPROUEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 ANO ST, 1973•2 (AOQENOUM NQ. 2) 6$TH AVENt1E: RICE GREEK TERRAC� TO 7TH STREET i1'H STREETs b7TH AVENUE TO 68TM AVENUE 7TH STR�ETt MISSISSIPPI STREET TO 67TH AVENUE (MSAS) L�GAI OESCRIP7ION FRONT ST. FRONT ST. SIOE ST. 8L CK FOOYAGf ASSESSMENT f00TAGE �E CREEK E� RRACE PlA-TTi'A�OOITION Continued) S 84b.7S 75 �7 . � 7S 84b.7S 7S 53(Pt.) � S 100 �0 S 100 1� S(1/� s) 4S So8.o5 100 b 7 8 9 1p � Quttot 1 � �► S :� � � iQ 11 b 6 6 �1/3 s) • b 6 �� . ? 7 7 � � 1 7 �1/3 S) . 4S S08.o5 7S 846.75 75 846.75 3b9 4,166.Qt 45 508.0� RIC� CREEK TERRACE i't.AT � ADOITION iQ if � i2 � 13 � . 14 ; �� . � i 1 !� � � 17 3 , � �?o; b�: i�' 75 75 7S 192(Pt.) �+3(Pt.) 75 �s 75 75 75 75' 7S 75 2$(Pt. ) 9a 90 90 � 15 41(Pt. 7, ft4 SIOE ST. TOTA� ESTIMATEO ASSESSMENT COST S 147.00 14�.00 103e88 196.00 f 96.00 196.00 i47.00 147.00 147.00 376.3� ' 84.28 147,00 14�.00 147.00 147.00 147.00 147.00 141.00 147.00 S 993.75 993.75 103.88 196.00 196,00 704.05 147.00 147.00 6SS.05 846.75 846.75 4,54x.33 84.28 147,oq �a�.00 147.00 147.00 147.00 14�.00 147,00 65S�OS 54.88 s4.88 �7b.40 1T6.4Q 176.44 17b,40 176.4Q 176.40 17b.4U 176.4p 147.OQ 14�,00 147.00 1�+7.00 80.3b 8oe3b 3`�'+,'9�� 35�,5�7�+�"'" ' ��tinwtee� Cpstt a3�,S22o40 • 3,149 feet = Silo29 per front foot � i,8za t�ont teet x st1.29 r�e� fooc = szo,63a.�2 1,3�1 feqt x$11.�9 pe� foot =$14,914.09 s14,914o0Q ►%,617 feet (footage sids ya�ds a�e spread ove�) = ' s1.96 psr fotat , ' ' � ` ' � ; i --SATfI.LiTE f�aNE "'� - .. . - ,x;;;' L.ANE :... .. .� WAY a � i � �'�- : ', :� � �.4. °+" ATE�I.i7E:`•� � •w ; � 4y a `. w �,� ' •, ; ,. •. :' ;:." � ' ,...;.. " " -=' � � ' � « � ,, w�Yr � I ` U ' � � ' i � � � �.i� r � ! j . �� 's .� •.._ r . e . .� +f s � � i W i :t �! :i�' / i "J.Q � � I � r.•, _. �,:.� '- �i ''+� � � , Q .2. J� . • i. � � • I�� , f � r .. i rw ; � ! � tK � r ? ,• .; �• J' � '- ,; �-�"�-'a.. :.T- ifl�IatS�iA? I �� ' ��t..N'i a � � � : 'V � ��4 �: ., i `,; �� ^ ',�Vr':�; v :..- ± ' '� • '\; i �, y� � „�e: � . '. � � i `1i V � � ' � •! QQ•� ''a�- +r;.... ..,y�.� ,. � � •�^. 1 �i.� y � �. ' ' _/•_``}.i��..�' �" ,' F �� ; � �, � ,� �` ` D� � , �RCtJ�RY =...ORIVE ' '- r- . -- WAY � � • ' � � �:j. � � .. r. • 'a'I•.v'w�� in i. p� . ,K i � I t � �i'' �} � f S 'i�' � '� �i�+.� � . �.r,i��, f � . >' 'I I I f r 1 � ��. ' * i.� I1i� � � 4_ ' I ` � � � t � :) s , � a/-y�, , ., , . ` i � . i� s v � r _�: � Z �- - '� 7 „-� _:r° i� � s � I a,• � i � � •�� 1 / � %� � , .� c �� °' l,. ; r « .. . . / , , , � I 1 wl ��¢j e. � '.\� �'r,Ir. •Sj. .y � i y i � ' n � � �r�{%/��i I � � �•iT ' , tI ; � �1 1 ;' �� l, �Fp�. C�A� '� �I ,� � � y .a I � i� ! I � 1 :.� �`+ �,�, i: Ll s . �f �, ,, � � .. 1 �P �{ ' � ' � � `,`.��! _ �� y 1 N r^�" � � �/_.1 � .� r � ..• ",� a� j '' �' , ,.� F�N�Y OPo � — ' .w��::��'� - -_" � y � " 3. WAY � i TFt! r� � = N' ---;- '��-� �s —�kME � �►;;; , . ( � : '$I ~ z � ,� ..., � - � \� s 1 ^x•..,.✓;, � � • i i,-. �a �. � � � 1�� 1 ia . -� + �s J' d `� ,.a, !r .T f�? ' / � �� ' �` r 'i. , ,+ 1t� � �``. � i � ?! z �:s.�e =` f Y � � .. .: I 1 i '�� . i Z." Y ; ' � � � i � � i Q" .G� q ^'2 Ix a 0� � «: � I _ � W �. � - , Q ;�. __ ... 1� � ,; - , ; i '�' r w. (� a J! � � � i? ' .'^ -�"y.�+ ♦ y , ~ 1 � •�ewn:` . ��vi � . ' �� j � � a '� y� � R i� F� ��._ � � �w ' '.. �rV''� / e � : 1 � �.i ' �. N . �: � r n '�-- . . �� i ! ; �, i � � 1 � ' �� a. � .�...�.:� � b Q� �r '. . . . � ' �' ► , , : r b Y��A� z; ,� �__ ., '� =.-, ; � f� � DRi E � ,. � V : .+v..��;,♦..�;.. j ' ` � � "` �.,. :. . ---ra• � � i 7e I . i , � , �►+! K � , a.i � ' v+ ' •' a. ' •�°� - ��/ I I v I! - -- r � �f1l..�i-a^- -- .� • ' � �• i ir Y .r SI is f4 i, ,� t � ,t I ;� r`��.: , ; ; i I ;� 1 �j� • •R ,!e �� y.n.�Mr-a.�"� LM�E MTL�•'� ` I � . _ \\\ `r , , ` ` ai� �' . ! ' � � ' � .. L _ 1 f\v 1 ". i 6 � �. i • 1 �' � � il�� .R/ � � � � I i fi 'L �' -� � : j` ' . i �, ' ., ,. .�. �. -_ ' �. �y `.r �= z� ' �` a . , � � � Z . � i° :� ,� � �E .„�r �/ L. • ' � ! I � � � $ w �� s �i � si l ,�� .)� � �'t t �- t� � y � � ,a ` 1yJ . WAY a � � � ' ' '� „ �� .� �: , ., . .: . _:---->_ N � , � oRiv� � z ,. � ' � •..' � . ,�v%'��. . a :. • � � �,\�. � z! ��s t' �� ""i ' ,��f f�'� � �ii �i ,9 '�/ �,i: r s .� • .� �� t� ~• \��,'i',\� ' ; I I' . - _'_'i"^,!C-. '" � ,��: s, j i � I � � � � � �}, :�� _ ,. ,• j � r� �e% �� { _ � ��.ii .ss.ta i�r ��j ;� E ^� " �» .. �� ' f .� � , �` '� ` , • ,fi _ , ,r I ; � ,� � _'�: ,�' x � � , � ; • ' � � -�� - . . Y I• i � . W a ? �,' � �-" :+_,:• -•, J � • rr � * - �'�'f •' _ ; r a� r ,. _ �, , �° •LAhc / ; ' �� p i ,... (� s. �r , . .,, a, ?' .� _ ' '•,!'* ,�;�I.i �j �_ [�s a,� � T�- =�.J 'r, � - a � :; '�._. ' � t ' a ,r t. iY 4f i �� s� - � I � � ; � + �r�-� � _ :. � r "i'' ,,.. y �.. y� e '� � V , • � ' • ,_.� ' !.7 d � "Tv '� Z h � ) Z i .{ � � Q ',� ��... � ' fl�H .� / s -f +*i �� e. 1- ,rR, �- ,�,• a •'• � •' y �� y ,. � F �' „ �/i p � � i ! � � ' a .. .. ' • - r * ., -. .-.- • ^ •� . . �.. . . .. ._. . ! ._—�.___�_ . . . . ... - ' ' � ..... . � . �_ . •- - M • �ll. � . ... '�+ .. y� :. � ---�L . - ��:- �� - ' J � , ij _ � . � '' 3p / "� ' �^ .t' / ' 40 ,♦ i: '� '+� � i � %.ir��.� ' i�d � . ' _ — _ _ . ? � Q � 1 8� 2 3 Z') 1. O Z� 2 S �4 � .� {Nµ.. �a � 18 j 26 j IB 3 , B 3. ,. i�� 6.N.RWI.'�Q � ls 4 �' ♦ 11 � � _..f....r. �. _ ��,. R � J.7.f AC, -- — . . ...; . �. is s as 5 zs s z� s� .. _. ' � � _�.. : �s r �e' E es � _ � „' ' • � . — --- I � �„ • .�� za � 2s %' zs � 2„— .'"� ". t,..,�s..,c..t«. �� g _3.. 6 2_° E `� 3_. j IO �4: � �e� 9 �2 � ?Z 9 — -r 3. ... ' �yy i�" � ? � 2i io /C �.'r' /0 6 — - �� .. � M.�.r � . „'Q ; z� i� :� .i 1v ,/ � c .i � �+ — . .. ..... . � (�91 ,? I�.wM�/� :� Ii 12 �9 /I H i2 %? /1 . �+..�� I ��+.� � IB /3 •6 :j /B /1 ,�+ ..; j. .. ' � � ' . . ,: ,. ,, ,a „ ,s , _.,:..._.. �T; 1913-i and 8T. 19T3-2 (Addendum No. 2) , b1�t Ave�ua,�Sxa� ite Boulevard. and Sylvan Lano ' ifoAt foat Rate •- 510.97 Side St�eet Rate •. s1.61 ' � ' ' ' � C�TY OF FRIDIEY MtELIMINAR� ASSESSMENT ROII STREET IM►ROVEMENT PRpJECT ST. 197�� 1 ANO ST. 1973•2 (�lDOENOUM N0. 2) ..�.,.. *.,..� �..� . b1ST AYE M1E: STARttTE 80UlEYARD TQ MAIN STREET 3TARLITE �Ot11.EVAROs 61 ST AVENUE i0 SYLVAN LANE SY�YAN I.ANEs STARL�TE 90UlEVARO TO JUP�TER ORIVE «GAk OESCRI PTi ON FRQNT ST. ' FOOTAGE �t4I R� SUBpIVI ION N�O. 7�„ �arcei' �'bB0 � , 1750 . � 1�90 t800 00 ' 1904 1990 (F b 256 1/3 s) ' �`w"�.VAN HIIkS PIAT 2 AOOITION 0 BLOCK � �� - l�.of 4 ' 2( P, 340 ) ' �t sA# �I i� Z� P.'� SD i' R�,ot S s 6 . 2� r,�6o ) ' �t,�rf b� 7 2 t P.390 ) ' Pt.o� i i 8 �( P.41 �) �c.�►t a z� 2 t P.4zo a 't.ot 9 � 10 2 �P.450) ' l�t�ot iQ i 11 � jF.480) �/3 side)48 12 2 ��'�1/3 Sj139 13 � 7S , �a � �s iS � � 7S ' 1b � � 7� � 17 � � 7� 18 2 7S t9 � ,7S ' �o � �� 1 • � 1S � ' '' ' ' ' x � is �� 7S � b � � 7S 7 � 7S 8 3 JS � � 7S !i � 7S FRONT ST. SI pE ST. ASSESSMENT FOOTAG� $ 2,808.32 �26.Sb 1,524.83 822.75 822.75 822.75 $22.75 822.75 $22.75 822.75 e22.�s 82z•7s s�z,�s 822.75 822.15 822.75 822.75 822.75 s2a.�s �zx.�s $22.75 822.75 184 18S 200 169 312 260 t�8(PC. ) .69 '��6� `7S 7S 75 �5 88 is 75 75 75 7S 7S 75 18(P�.) v! SIOE ST. TOTAL ESl'IMA�EO ASSESSMENT COST $ 296.24 x97.�5 32z.00 272.09 soz.32 418.b0 28.�98 111.09 111.09 111.09 120.75 t2o.7s t2o.�s tzo.�s 141.68 14b.51 tzo.�s 120.75 1Z0.7S 1�0.75 120.75 120.75 12A.75 2$.�a S 296.24 297.85 322.00 272,09� 502.32 3,226.92 S 28.g8 111.Q9 111,0� iti.o9 120.7� 12o.7S t2o.7s � 2o,�s 668.24 1,b71.3� 943.50 943.So 9�+3 �SQ 943.50 �+3.SQ 943.50 943.50 as�.�� 822.75 s2z.�s 822.75 szz.�s sa2.7� 822.75 822.7S, 822.7� 82z.7S 822,75 82t.75 � ' ' � , � � CITY OF FRIDLEY � PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROL! STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. � - 1973-i AND ST, 1973-2 (ADDENDIJM N0. 2) 61ST AVEFAIE: STARLITE BOi1�EVARD TO MAIN STREET � ' STARLITE 801lLEVARO: 61 ST AVEF.'UE TO SYLYAN IANE SYtVAN LAI�iE: STARLITE BOUCEVARO TO JUPITER QRIVE LEGI�t. DESCRI PTI ON FRONT ST. LOT BLOCK FOOTAGE SYLVAN HIttS PI.AT 3 ADDIT�ION 10 1 0 11 1 gp i2 1 gp 13 1 80 i4 1 80 f; 1 91 1 2 3 � 4 6 8 9 2t 2� 23 24 25 26 .7 8 9 t0 11 '12 6 8 to 11 i2 13 14 iS 16 2tF�t/3 s) 2 2 2(FSt/3 s) � 2 2 2 2 " 2 $ z � ��3 S� � 3 3 3 � � 125 80 80 80 105 �+S 78 78 78 78 78 78 FROHT ST. ASSESSMENT $ 877.60 877.60 877.60 877.60 877.60 998.27 1,371.25 877.60 877.60 877.60 1,151.85 493.65 855.66 $5S.66 85S.66 855.66 855.66 855.66 SI DE ST. FOOTAGE 80 80 80 80 85 80 80 80 80 20(Pt.) 80 15 $0, 8� $Q SI DE ST. ASSESSMENT S 128.80 128.80 128.80 � 128.80 136.85 128.80 128.80 128.80 128.80 32.20 128.80 120.75 128.80 �2s.so 128.80 - �lb n TOTAL ESTIMATEO C OST S 877.60 877.60 877.60 $7T.6o� 877.60 998.27 1,500.05 1,006.40 1,006,40 1,006.40 1,288.70 128.80 128.80 128.80 128.80 32.?0 128.80 t2o.75 128,80 � 2s.so 622.45 85S.b6 855.66 855.66 855.66 855.66 855.66 4 75 822.75 822.75 4 75 822.75 822.7, 4 75 822,75 8z2.15 4 75 822.75 822.15 4 15 822.75 822.75 � �s s22.�s 822.�s 75 822,75 . 822.15 �+ 75 822.75 822075 4 75 822.75 822.75 � 75 822.15 82xa15 4 7S 822.75 822o1S 4 7S 822 75 822 ��'!,j � Estimated Cost: � ' � , `4;3�i�t. + ,53+e7 3�b97 F`t. �5,95�7` 5�2, �+��:91 552,455.10 � 4,784 Feet =$10.97 per front foot 4,242 Front Feet x S10.97 per foot =$46,534.74 S42 Feet x$10.91 pe� foot =$5,945.7� $5,9t+So74 � 3,697 fcst (faotage �ide yards ars spread overj =$1.b1 per F! ' . .' . i�� ' � ��_` . ^ , ,co �oozs �3i , � \` �� ,. -�,, ��o. - •- �- - —�•��' i toF �' ` �_ . ! ' s.� : �s� I - ,,�' ' � t I'' ��)� F°2t . ' � � '► �°qi. v m; � 66 \ ! �a' ` �1V i •22 w Z� anyt 'ZQ �t m V' o�O�� `� -�i`� : � . l 'Z , �-�� .n�. �,�� 1 .,��..-.,� 'I'� � t� I �c � f 3 � . � et) �, }.,.,, /1J�C �. W � � � m ' �-=-_ - : ^ ' - � O 9By� ,�co6 � ,GGO i ,op/o l � ��) �?b i � I 4 � � i �fi� �i 9A9B ' ioo � /oo "� q N I99�J 21775 r // � �� /7 � � %% d /B � a � /9 4 ^' ; � � � � � .: N (��ol � � � n; � v � �, �� 2»!O Z99B � .a�c � i "1 -� � �. '", },�, ' c�O �i0� 0 W N �g ~� � �� Y��"'� •..,,_ �=.i � �. � �� (so� � � � 5 . ,�,�-� 1 . � � : : YSd '� c� � � R� _ ' f t 19 . B e I7'' � �/��__�°� 1__�.• �_ in �; . ►" � � �/ 0 M � . � a��.Y ��w ! 1i�6 ,. �/ �� \ J� � � . �� o w� �T� \�-iW�� / .f 0 � .61 � � ' ,e Z�j.f6 � :� - �2�9.Ef.-- a ti ' � . � � . 293.��, "`� �_. �� i . � � . � ¢.' y p � C � ° /6' � 7 � ,� �� ; � � � ' J � �_.,.�..r.� �. �A :� � i � 99ij0 299:+"9 �+. � 19 .60 �?99 s9 . `1 � e .17: i �, i�IZY � . . = �� i1� i a ° �0�11f1i.JV' q� o � o � � .� .3 �; N � ; � a :. ( � . �=s :..d:: \ / � \ J --?9� �i.is , =o' .rz vei +� I 299 29oQt,.w. ,r�� `Mi 7 vi � . -- /1:.16 a I:•`yrE �! � i �:�� ; 4- �� 2 W � V � F �� . � � � � i� � ` � jzi�� _ � �� I �1b, 9z ..�� a- � ►.'7. . e . � ' -`L � Aj'•4 �— tl� � .�� • �.e . � . .a `9 .4A __ �J 1� fv � � �� , � :ati . . � �:jZ:e � _ �j7�c t�►� � �� k' � � a - '� � � E- � F� 3 0� o Y ti � "+" ,�`•� � �'f ""� ��,— ,��.:rr_ u� �' ti i ` �3! "' . � � � � `� a � _ ✓ . � �• � �50� G .v7.lz ��'� � � �, Q �C; Ir• . ti � � ��-r Q. 3 a — — —��°— — � .� — _ z9 • ""� : �� s� � � '� r,>: s ��,' �_ _ � � ,�l 5� � � `�� . � � �/�] ��,� /� • � � ; �e.., 's ' . ..919 . : ,Z, ti o � � . •1' C - ✓ _ - T� )� ,�.. . 3 �o� . � t � �.� ` , ` � �: t�,�'• � aF<:. Q �� , o „ _. �,�-- �t� -� �. 7s � ou.,s. F6 � ,,,,, a .�, 2f � -r ,��:? °0 3' � ._;� - . ' n�er�.��.s- . . � M1 V' _'. _ _ sr6----- B-_�Z�67-_ AV�.-" _ . -�--f1}{; - �' _ ��-T,n.. � . • �^ '" ; - ,-� . � ,. „ 1.+ ., • , - - _---- �, .: -.r -.., ; � ' i .�;. -� - �.., � . �, : � �o „ � . � j � «o, � i-.-• So °.s i � ,� � �3 � ! rFa> •' `-'• p •:�' • ='t, i �,:;: . i ��Na/in �,.% � �'3 ;�M�i ,��' � ,3 � � . . � A j �v�nr �� ; � � � . � � � �%fA/rillti i �! �o i �fS� 1a ? - 1• i�_.:1� � fo Vt� aJ � dG � _ � � �_. .� �f�' i /12..s••-.•w„s��cy • -- .1.� �=s� i3 :a , Sr. 1973-1 and ST, 1973-z (Addendum Mo. 2) McKinle�r Street: 75th Avenue to Lakeside Roa Street Surfacing: F�ont Foot Rate -- $i5.62 Side SLreet Rate -- $2.44 Wate� -- 513.21 per Foot Scr+►er -- 513.26 per Foot � ' CITY Of FRIOLEY PRELIMIINARY ASSESSMENT ROII STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND ST. 1973-2 (ADDENOUH N0. 2) �. � ' ' �J MCKIPiI.EY STR�ET: 73R0 AVEFIUE TO LAKESIOE ROAD (Street Surfacinq, Includinq Storm Se+ver Wo�k) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION FRONT ST. FRONT STo SIDE STo LOT BiaCK FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT f00TaGE AIiLSTROM Af}'�I7ION 1 t 8o S 1,249.60 2 i 80 1,249.60 3 1 80 1,249.60 OUIMETTE TERRACE ADDITION 1 1F 93 1,452.66 2� 1 107 1,671.34 3 1 (t�) too 1,562.00 ' i (Fbl/3 S) 2 (TF) 122 i 2 �rF) 9t � 3 2 (TF) 91 i , � , SPRING LAKE PARK IAKESIDE AOOITION 3 1 1S0 4 1 120 6 . � . : ,F ;. 120 . � :;�, t2o �Pt:of 9 1 i P.370 ) Pt.of q�(i/3 S) 1 (P.380)40 ts - � {TF) tzo 13 1 (TF) 120 14 1 (TF) tzo 1,905.b►+ t,421.42 1,421.42 2,343.00 1,874.40 1,874.40 1,874.40 624.80 1,874.40 1,874.40 1,874.40 _ _ .. I � .' . . SIDE ST. TOTAL ESTIMATEO ASSESSMEHT COST 91 $ 222.04 4,(Pt.) 109.80 39(Pt. ) 120, �,. 57tpt.) 80 t2(Pt.) 120 120 95.16 292.80 139.08 195.20 29s2� 292.80 292.80 S 1,249.60 1,249.60 1,249.60 1,4�2.66 1,671.34 1,Sb2.00 2,127.68 1,531.22 1,421.42 2,343.00 1,874.40 1,96g.56 2,167.20 139.08 820.00 1,903.68 z,t67.2o 2,167.20 STINSON BOUt£VARt3 ADDITION � 1 0 1,249.60 80 195.20 1,444,80 S .I iTFj k�., ,80 1,249060 80 19S.2o 1,444.80 �6 1(TF) 80 1 249.60 80 195.20 1 444,80 �., ., , 1,9 Ft. 31,i .�2 92 Ft. 2,25 .5� 33, 00. Esti�nattd Costs ry$33,390.90 � 2,138 Feet =$1S.b2 pe� f�ont foot 1,994 Front Feet x$15.62 per Faot =$31,146.28 . : 144 Feet x$15.62 per Foot =$2,249.28 ' - S2s249.Z8 + 924 Feet (footage side yards are spread over) =$2.44 per Ft. 0 .. t., , • _�.3 CITY OF FRIDLEY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL '' � STREET TMPROVEHENT PROJECT ST. 1973_1 AND ST. 1973-2 (kODENOUM N0. 2) � MCKINIEY STREET: 7�TH AVEt�UE TO LAKESIOE ROAD � (1later and Sewer Imp�ovements) Lf6AL OESCRIPTION _ WATER WAiER SEWER SENER TOTAL ESTIMATEO LOT BLOCK FOOTAGE ASSESSMENT F00_TAGE� ASSESSHENT COST AHLSTRQM ADDIiION T 1 80 $ t,061.60 80 $ 1,060.80 $ 2,i22.40 2 , 1 80 {,061.60 80 1,060.80 2,122.40 OUINETTE TERRACE AODITION i 1 TF` 93 t,234.ti 93 1,233.18 2,467.29. 2 1 107 1,419.89 107 1,418.82 2,838.71 � 2 iTF� 91 1,207.57 91 1,206.66 2,414.23 2 2(TF) 91 1,207.57 91 1,206.66 2,�14.23 SPRING LAKE PARK LAKESIDE AODITION 3 1 i5o t,99o.50 150 t,g89.00 3,919.50 4 1 t20 1,592.40 120 1,591.20 3,183.60 S 1 120 1,592.40 120 1,591.20 3,183.50 6 1 120 1,592.40 12� 1,591.20 3,183060 12 . � 1(TF) 12Q 1,S92.4o 120 1,591.20 3,i83.60 13 1�TF� 120 i,392.40 12o t,Sg1.20 3,183.60 14 1(TF) 1�0 1,592.40 120 1,591.20 3,183.60 STINSON 80ULFVARO AQDI7ION 1 0 1,061.60 80 1,060080 2,122,40 S � 1(TF) 80 1,061.60 80 1,060080 2,122.4p 6 1 trF) 80 � 06�.6o so 1 obo.8o 2,�22.40 ,� � h� ;, ,, 5,.. Ft. �1,93'�:O+r" 1,�5�.Ft. ,9�5052 3, 27.5 £stimated 4/ater Cost: $21,911.SO t 1,652 Feet =$�3,27 per Foot Estimated Sewer Costs 521,897.12 � 1,652 Feet =$13026 per Foot ' . � � � GI1'Y �F FRIALEY PREI.IMTNARY ASi'�SSMENT ROLL �'REET II4PRQVEMENT PAOJECT ST. 1973-1 A.1�TD 1973-2 (ADDENDUM N0. 2) LEGAL DFSCRIPTION NAI� AND ADDRESS 8�CTION 14 �__,. � PARCEL N0. ---r------ • �50Q �ndependent School District �14 6100 West Moore I,ak� Drive Fridley, Minnesota 55432 0 � � �� „ CI�C OF FRIDLEY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROI,L STRE�T �FIrRQVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 ANO 197'3-2 (AOOENOUM �o� LEGAL DESGRIPTIQN NAME AND AOORESS AtJDI OR�S UBOIVISION NQ. 8 NQ, 168Q � tuciite J. Ofatedai �� 179Q 1800 1900 1980 • 0 0 S�1 Interlachen Circie Minneapolis, Minnesata SS436 and Lawrence f. and G�ace S. Fa1k Drug Suppty Campany S90Q Main St�eet Northeast Minneapotisi Minnesota SS421 Donatd Stotts 52�0 Taylor St�eet Northeast Minneapolis� Minnesot� SS4�1 The Samu�l�and Esther Cohen �Oundatia� c/a Summit Ge�� Canpany, Inc. �131 Vicksburg Lane , Mame1, Minnesata 55346 6uriington-No�thern, Inc. Propertr Tax Depa�tmen� 176 East Fifth St�eat St. Paul, Mi�n�sota ��iQ1 �� . �� Great Mo�thar� Railway . 1190 Great Northe�n 9uilding St. Paul, Minnesota SS101 ��. r ' � CITY CF FRIO�EY rRE�IMINARY ASSESSM�NT ROII STR�ET IMPROVEMENT PROJEC�T ST. 1973.1 ANO 1�73•2 (AOOENDUM N0. 2) , .......�....,..,._,_....._.._.... . �__ ._._�..�...._...�.�_.._.,. LE6Al OESCRIPTIOM NAME ANO AODR£SS , 'a�sT�vM aoQ T�oN 0. . � �K �■ 1 1 Aitan 1., and Jean I. Ahlst�an � � 3 1 1 0 1 b�+S - 7Sth Averwe Northeast f�idler, Minnesata �5432 �� 0 0 i� e r c�Tr oF Fa�o��Y PR�4IMINARY ASSESSMENT RQIL STAEEi �MPROVEMENT PROJECT STe 1913-f ANO 191,�-2 (AODENOUM�NO. 2} ........�._`.� , . , ....., IEf�A�. OESCRI PTI ON NAME ANO AOORESS AlxM�TT'� TERRACE 6L K ..... ...�.. 1 ' 1 Tax.Fo�feit Propertr x 1 Haae Federai � � 2 � #. ' l 1 2 t � 730 Mennepi� Avenue Minneapo.lis, Minnasota SS403 Tsx Forfeit Prope�tr Tax Forfeit P�opertr Tax Forfeit Propertr Tax forfeit fMoperty � � t� !>-� a � CITY OF �'RIDLEY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST, 1973-1 ��TD 1973-2 (ADDENDUM N01 2) LEGAL DESCRIPTION NAME AND ADDRESS � RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1 � LOT BLOCK � �. 6 1 Robert W. Eigenhur 7 8 9 10 1 � 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 Part .4 (Ex.E 75' ) 2 Part 4 (E 75' ) 5 6 � 2 2 531 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Waliace E. & Eleanor S. Erlandson 521 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Roger & Sharon Freitag 509 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Erwin J. & Agnes E. Christianson 503 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Fridley Church of Christ 501 Mississippi Street NE . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Leif & Betty Henrikson . 495 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Roy & Borghild Woolery 465 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Boress A Zile 431 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Bennett Sorum 4I1 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 John H. Sorensen 421 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Bennett Sorum Ranko & Icena Schuur 401 Mississippi Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � 2(Notite only) George & Delores Meissner 373 Mississippi Street NE • Fridley, Minnesota 55432 . '^% � � ' , . CITY OF FRIbLEY _I � PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL � tSTREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST, 1973-1 :1ND 1973-2 (ADDEi�Ti'UM N0. 2) " . . . . ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION NAME AND ADDRESS . RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1(Cont'd) � LOT . BLOCK . , 8 � . 2(Notice only) �lifford �. Nelson 365 Mississippi Street NE . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 ' 9 2 R' Otto R. & Lucille Marsolek . 355 Mississippi Street NE , Fridley, Minnesota 55432 10 2 " � Theisen's Market, Inc. _ , • 4495 North Shore Drive Mound, Minnesota 55364 11 _ 2 a Theisen's Market, Inc. .' "12 . 2 �� Theisen's Market, Inc. . , ' .. �. _ _' , ' , . ' ' ' ' � ' CITY OF FRIDLEY � PRELIMINARX ASSESSMENT ROLI. BTREET I�ROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 �ADDENDUM N�,O. 2) I.RGAL D�SCRTPTION RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2 . LOT ��4RCEL BLOCK NAME AND ADDRESS •-.-�. 4 1 Albin & Margarete S. Weber S ], 6 1 1 2 2 & part 3 2 . Pt3-k 130 2 Pt4-5 16U 2 Pt 5 1$0 2 ' �t5 8�6 27.0 2 '� � p�.a z � p� & 26Q 2 Pl�8 b� p� 9 2 525 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Henry B& Charlotte M. Martin 515 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Howard $, & Joyce M• Larson 505 66th Ave.• �IE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 ltodney 3. Middlestedt k95 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Genevieve M. Nelson • � 3$1.-66th �ve. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � James A. & Janet B. Thayer 377 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota SS432 Octave L. & �sabel g. Sayther 375 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Charles & Margaret Joha�nson C/P Robert G. & Mary Kobb C/p Farcners & Mechanics Bank 90 South 6th Street Mpls., Minnesota 55402 Gary �. & Norma J. Andexson C/P Donald K. & Shi.rley C. Noz�th 371 66th Ave. Nt; Fxidley, Minneaota 55432 Lloyd A. & Anna May Benneth�na 3b9 66th Ave, NE Fridley, Minnesota SS432 Leonard Li.ndstone 5825 McGee Kansas City, Mo. 64113 Jon B. & He1en M. I,arson 367 66th Ave. N� $ridley, Min�t�eaQta 55k�2 � . � . ' CTTY OF FRIDLEY �I . PRELII�IIIRARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ' STREET IMPR�VEI�NT P1t0.TECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 (ADDENDUM N4. 2) ' � LBGAL DESRTPTI�N ' RIG� CR�EK T�RRACE PI.AT 2(Cont'd) " � LO�T PARCEL BI.00K NAME AND ADDRESS ' p� 9 31�0 2(Juit noticei � 14 Duane & Peggy Han,san 365 66th Ave. NE ' . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 �� Nolan & Joyce Johnson 363 66th Ave. NE ' Fridley, Minnesota 554�2 ' • �� 2 �� Duane .T. & Betty prestby ' � 361 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota SS432 .�� Avia Campbell ' � " 359 66th Ave. N8 . • Fridley, Minnesota 55432 ' 1k � , �� Theresa p, Benner 357 66th Ave. NE ;, � Fridley, Minnesota 55432 , !.� � 1b � z �" �Lowell & �auline McGxegor � . 355- 66th Ave. NE � Fridley, Minnesota SS432 ' � � . Ra ond & IKax Habel Ym Y 392 66th Ave. NE ' ' Fridley, Minnesata 55432 Z 3 Raymond �. & Phyllis Anderson ' � 390-66th Ave. NE �'ridley, Minneaota 55432 � . �3 �& pt4 � Aoger C. & Deborah A, Harmoa , 38$ 66th Av;e. N� � ' � Pzidley, Miannesota 55432 ' Pt4 � P� S 3 Ellswarth F, & Florence Hin� 384 66th Ave. NE � � Fxidley, Minnesota 55432 '' Pt 5 b�'t4 3 ,�ohn H. & Ao�alie Iialling ` - 380-66th Ave. NE � I , . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � PX 6'b Pt ? 3 William & Florence Klobucher ; 378 66th Ave. NE , • Fridley, Minnesota 55432 i F� 7 bo 8�$ � Harold & Viva Ohlseon , - 376 66¢h Ave. NF , �'�r�.d�Q�, �i�� k�� ❑ C�TY 0�' FRIALEY PR�LIMINARY ASSESSMENT RQLL STItEET ZMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 (,ADDENXIUM NO. 2) LEf� L AE SCR�PTION NAI�: AND ADDRE S S AICE GREEK TERRACE PLAT 2�Cont'd) � , . . p� �� 6�p � Margaret E. Johnson iQ li 12 13-16 k S, b 374 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 3��xica o�tr) Donald V. & Rachel Hinz 372 66th Ave. NE Frid�ey, Minne�ota 55432 3 " Sylvester & Marion �Clous 374 66th Ave. N� Pri�}Yey, Minnesota SS432 � �� Donald � pearl Bennethum 368 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota SSk32 3 . � Theisen's Marke�, Inc. 4495 North Shox'e Drive ' . � Mound, Minneaota SS3fi4 4 Harold L. b Mary g. �ullivan 522 66th Ave. N� Fridley, Mtnnesota 55432 � David F• � Carol E. �.ilygren C/P Thomas .T. & ,Toan D. Toussaint � 512 66th Ave. N� Fxidley, Minne�pta 55432 �► Jerome M. & Jacqueline K1ees S02 66th Ave, NE Fx'idiey, Minnesota 55432 ,� aC � � � CITY OF E'RTDLEY PREI.IMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL STREBT IMPRO�iEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 (ADDENDUM N0. 2) DESCRIPTIQN NGJ3MENT OF LOTS 1,2,3 BLOCK 1& LOT i,2,3 BLOCK 4 RICE CREEK TERR N0. NAME AND ADDRESS peter M. & Sharon Wold 537 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota David W. & Joan E. Allen � � 543 66th Ave. i�tE Fridley, rtinnesota 55432 ' Alex. J. & Gertrude K. Ramola c/p John & Rosemary Fong yer� ' . SS3 66th Ave. NE � � Fridley, Mianeaota 55432 William J. Jr. & Randa Bonner 552 66th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 piktorin � Barbara 3tutz � 542 66th Ave. NE � . Fridley, Minaesota 55432 � , Donald & Connie �landers • 532 66th Ave. NE ' Fr�,dley, �innesota 55432 �� 0 � PLAT 2 �3 � i � ? d � i ' CITY 4F FRIDLEY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 and 1973-2 (ADDENAUM N0. 2) ILEGAL DESCRIPTION NAME AND ADDRESS � AICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 3 , ' 1 k Leslie & Joyce Nordin 491 67th Ave. NE ' , Fridley, Minnesota 55432 2 4 Lowell & Marilyn �oe .• 481 67 th Av e. NE ' Fridley, Minnesota SS432 3 4 Delmour W. & Luella Fenske ' 471 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 1 S(NotiC• o�lr) Lawrence W. & Marie Pearce ' 350 67th Ave. NE • Fridley, Minnesot�a 55432 ' Z 5 N Russell J. b� Rita F. S�nith 360 67th Ave. NE . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 ' 3 � S '� LeRoy A. & Florence 82omster 370 67th Ave. NE '� Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � k S N Lyle & Josephine �,arson 380 67 th Av e. NE ' Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � 5 5 „ Grant A. & Ma.rie L. Olson � 390 b7th Ave. NE ' _ Fridley, Minnesota 55432 6 S �� Cathexine A. Loquai ' � . 400 67th Ave, NE . Fs�idley, Minnesota 55432 • ' 7 5 " Mazv in H. & Doris A. Asp 41067thAve. N� Fridley, Minnesota 55432 ' $ 5 Martia E. & Mary .io Bistram + � k20 67th Ave, NE � Fridley, Minnesota 55432 ' 9 5 Jack 0. & Corine A. Kirkham � 430 67th Ave. NE � ' . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 I �,(� 5 �Ta�xy► G. � Florence Narling ' C�P David J. F� A(�eline Dackter k40 67th Ave, NE � �''�'�� M?-an��4t� ��t�� _ _ , . _ _ ,.,� � � CITY OF FRIDLEY ° PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL �/ i � , Sl'REET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 (ADDENDUM N0. 2) "' � LEC��L DESCRIPTION NAME AND ADDRESS � ', RICE CREER TERRACE pLAT 3 Cont'd) � �' � � ' 11 S Thomas & Kathryn Klein 450 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 , 12 S Joseph & LaVonne Christensen � . 460 67th Ave. NE � Fridley, Minnesota 55432 , 13 5 Edwin & Casmira Saefke ' � 470 67th Ave. NE � ' . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 �4 S Walter H. & Katherine Habrink ' 480 67th Ave. NE . Fridley, Mi��sota 55432 15 " 5 Dale R. & Dorothy Maus ' 490 67th Ave. NE " Fridley, Minnesota 55432 , ,j I 1 . ' ' _ . ' � - ' . � I t ' . ' ' ' CITY OF FRIDLEY PRELIMINA.RY ASSESSMENT ROLL : STBEET Il�ROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 (ADDENDUM N0. 2) LSGAL DESCRIPTION NAME AND ADDRESS RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 4 . Y 3. Robert J. Jr. & Marilyn C. Olmstead ' 6850 7th Street NE Fridley, Minnesota �5432 2 3 Elmer J. & Doris A. Johnson � � 6840 7th Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 3 3 Armond H. & Frances E. Grage 6830 7th Street NE � Fridley, Minnesota 55432 4 3 John & Barbara Brown � 6820 7th Street NE ' . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 S 3 Richard & Kathryn Fischbach 6810 7th Street Fridley, Minnesota 55432 6� 3 � Jon H. & Norma Johnson � 6800 7th Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � 3 Waldemar H. & Helen Olsen 524 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 3 , 3 Doran & Suzanne Edingex 536 Rice Creek Terrace Fridiey, Minnesota 55432 � 3 Robert J. & Barbara Hughes � 548 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 l0 3 Maurice & Martha Meyer 560 Rice Creek Terrace �' FridZey, Minnesota 55432 � S William S. &Elaine Knoff 6776 7th .Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 • 5 Fredric A. Bischke b766 7th Str�et 1VE , Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � , � S' Joseph J. & Patricia L. Mikre '� 6756 7th Street Fridley, Minnesota 55432 - -�� • . � CITY OF FRIALEX . PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT R4I.L STREET II�IPROV�I�NT PROJBCT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 (ADDENDUM N0. 2) �._ � I,ECAL DE3CAIPTION • NAME AND ADDRESS RICE GRI:EK� CE �LAT 4(Cont' d.) k S David P. & Marlene M. Richter ✓ 6746 7th Street NE Fridley, Minnesota SS432 S S Richard C.�K�athleen M. Ke�nper j 6736 7th Street NE `� Fridley, Minnesota 55432 6 S Stanley R. & Melva Hill 6726 7th StreeC NE � Fri.dley, Minnesota 55432 ' i 5 Kenneth R. & Patricia M. Srannan . 6716 7th Street NE . Fridley, Minnesota SS432 8 5 C8r1 & Ann Asprath 470 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 9� 5 St. Phillips Lutheran Church 1050 West Moore Lake Dxive Fridley, Minnesota SS432 10 S Fred A. & Arella Sare�te 494 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55�+32 11 5 • Richard C. & Marilyn E, Laraon 506 Rice Creek Terxace ' Fridley, Minaesata SS432 6 6 John A. & Karen E. Hanaon 517 67th Ave,r1E Fridley, Minnesota 55432 7 � 6 Lyle M. Jr. & Iva B. Dean . 509 67th Aye. DTE Fridley, M nnesota SS432 , 8 b Roy E. Jr. & Bernice Kirkham 501 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minneso�a SS432 �See mixt pag� fo� Lots 9 and 10, elock 6, Rice C�eek Ter�+�ce Piat 4 Addition) pu�lotl 6 City of Fridley park Property 3 7 ' I�t lm F. Ramsey 9b4 67th �ve. NE � ' ' Fridley, Mi�nesota SS43,Z � � ' � CITY OF FRIDLEY � PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ' STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 ADDENDUM N0. 2) ;' LEGAL DESCRIPTION NAME AND ADDRESS . RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 4(Cont'd) 4 7 Arthur E. & Margaret N. Larson � � ' S ' 6 � 7 � 8 � ' 9 . , 10 ' . 11 ' � 9 , 10 ' ' ' ' 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 556 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Joseph M. & Marjorie M. Kxauter 548 67th Ave. NE -Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Floyd J. & Lorraine M. Ordemann 540 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Raymond V. & Beverly M. Kostelecky 532 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Roger D. � Joyce A. Kientop 524 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Joyce Samuelson 516 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Wallace R. & Marion H. Froehle 508 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Wiliiam G. & Bonnie A. Mousel 500 67th Ave. NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 6 Joh� S. and Oarlene M. Zurawski 6767 Seventh Strect Northeast fridley, �innesota 55�+32 6 Ge�atd G. and Mary K. Ingatdson 6777 Seventh Street Northeast F�idtey, Ninnesata 55�32 - °�� . I ' i' . iR 1 � ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 � - 1 � , 15 ' 16 ' . 17 ' ' ' ' � ' � ' ' CITY OF FRIDLEY ' PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL STREET IlKPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 (ADDENDUM N0, 2) ' EGAL DESCRIPTION NAME AND ADDRESS ICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 7 � . 0 3 Richard J. & Virginia R. Heffner 580 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 1 3 peter A. & Shirley M. Schenk 576 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 2 3 Charles E. & Charlotte S. Howey � 572 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 3 3 Gerald G. & Elizabeth M. Carlson 568 Rice Creek Terrace Fridley, Minnesota 55432 4 3. � Charles A. & Edith Chesley � 564 Rice Creek Terrace , Fridley, Minnesota 55432 3 - Dale W. & Luann E. Nuszloch 6852 7th Street : Fridley, Minnesota 55432 3 Willard E. & Mary Jean Thorp 6854 7th Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 3 Cathyleen M, & Marguerite B. Firnstahl 6856 7th Street NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 +�9 0 ' �d CI7Y Of FRID�.EY ' PRELIMIHARY ASSESSMENT ROIL �" ; � STFtEET �M�ROVEMENT PRQJECT ST. 1973-1 ANO 1973-Z (AOOENOUM N0. 2) � '' LEGAt OESCRIPTI�'�i NAME AND ADORESS � ISPRIN6 LAKE PAR14 l.A10ESIOE AOOITION LOT BLOCK ' 3 1 James B. and Janet M. Rudnitski 16�8 - 77th Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 ' � Z Robert D. and Atice Henderson j600 Stinson 9aulevard ' . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 S 1 6ene R. Lake (C P) ' ' 7584 Stinson Bau�evard Fridley, Minr�esota 55�+32 - and � � Watter l. and Mildred Peterso� (?) , b 1 ' David A. and Gail E. 8er sven 9 , . 7566 Sti�son Boulevard ' . F�idley, Minnesota SS432 Pt. of 9 t(i�arcei 37�) Ctyd� W. and Eleanor E, Saari � � � : 165a • 75th Avenue Northeast Fridtey, Minnesata 55432 ' Pt. of 9 1��arcel 380j Ver�on ar�d.0orothy R. Ruthe�ford 1655 - 75#� Avenue h+artheast Frid]ey, Minnesota 55432 12. � 1� Rudoiph C. �aysr and Oonald Wehlast , 1 84 Can on LaR� 7 y St. Paul, Micanasota 55112 ' 13 � l �� ' t4 1 - �� . , . ' ' _ . � - . � ' . I . � � •� - - ' • CITY OF FRIOLEY , : PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROIL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1913-1 RND 1973-2 (ADDENQUM N0. 2) , tEGA� DESCRIPTION NANE ANO ADDRESS . STINSON BOULEVARU ADDITION , LOT BLOCK __.___. ' 4 1 Date Tite Com�any Corporation . 4813 France Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55�+29 , S 1 Tax Forfeit Property 6 1 Tax Forfeit Property ' . ' � '. . ' . . . : _, . - � � ' � � - � � ' ' , i ' I . ' , . : �1 ,. . . 0 ' CITY OF FRIDLEY PRELiMiNAR1f asSESSMENT ROLL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 (AODENDUM N0. 2) IEGAL DESCRIPTION NAME AND AODRESS LOT BIOCiC SYLYAN HILLS P�AT 2 ADDITION 3 tester w. and Betty J. Larson 6180 Trinity Orive Northeast Pt. of 4 2(p. 340) Pt. of 4 b S 2(P. 350i Pt. of � s 6 2(P. 360) Pt. of 6 b 7 2(P. 39oi Pt. of ] t� 8 2(P. 410) Pt. of 8 b 9 2( P. 420 ) Pt. of 9b10 2(P, 450) Pt. of lObtt 2(P. 480) i2 i3 14 2 � 2 Fridley, M�nnesota 55432 Verner T. and Ruby E. Sholander 6170 Trinity Orive Fridiey, Minnesota 55432 Jack D. and Darlene M. Lundberg 6t60 T�inity Drive North�east FridTey, Minnesota 55432 Robert C. and Pearl M. Peterson 6150 Trinity Drive Northeast Fridiey, MinnesoYa 55432 A]ma S. Masson 6140 Tri�ity Drive No�theast fridley, Minnesota 55432 LeRoy T, and Chariotte P. Haiverson 6130 T�inity Orive NorLheast Fridley, Minnesota 5S432 John D. a�d 0. Ann Nolt 612fl Trinity Orive Nottheast Fridtcy, Minnesota 55�+32 Clarence M. and Atice D. Otten 6110 Trinity Drive Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55�+32 Robert A. and Patricia A. Traczyk 6100 Trinity Drive Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Wiiiiam F. and �orayn M. Fi�k, Jr. 6101 Starlite Drive Frisiiey, Minnesota 55432 Robert w. and Lorraine G. Martin 611i Sta�lite 81vd. Fridi�y, Minnesota SS432 Randall and Janette Shegstad 6i21 Starlite Blvd. F�idley, Minnesota 55432 �� , , . �: - � _ , _;� CITY OF FRIOt,EY PREIIMINARY ASSESSt1ENT ROLI STR£ET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 ANO 1973-2 (AOOENOUM N0. 2) L VAN H I�.3� I L�£"�ds'� I^�f N GAt i3ESGP.I PTI O!� � N/WE AND ADORESS " T BLOCK S 2 Paut J. and Rosemary Y. Humnick � 6131 Starlite Bivd. frid�ey, Minnesota 55432 , 6 Z Luke J. and Bernadette Pflegfiaar 6�41 Stariite Slvd. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 � Z Hume R. and Phyllis A. Minard 6151 Starlite elvd. . Fridiey, Minnesota SSk32 3 Z Ashak and Ma�ie Gupta 6151 Sta�3ite Blvd. _ Fridley, Minnesota SSk32 � 2 Leo�ard A. and Avellens M. Steinert 1 6171 Starlite 81vd. � Fridley, Minnesota 55�+32 ►. . 2 � .Archie E. and Sylvia G. Lindgren � 6181 Starlite 81vd. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 2 Ferdinand C. and Norma A. Johnson 6191 Stariite 81vd, - � Fridley, Minnesata 55�+32 3 Carlson-tavine, Inc. � 2831 Ald�ich Avenue South � - Minneapolis, Minnesota SS408 3 y �� 3 3 3 3 3 3 Walter and Rose T, Iskierka 6170 Starlite Blvd. F�idley, Minnesota 55�+32 Cariso�-Lavine, Inc. � �� « �� - 33 . CITY OF FRIO�EY . � PRELININaRY ASSESSMENT ROLL � STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 AND 1973-2 (AOOEtddUM N0� SYLYAN HILLS P�AT 2 AODItION . EGA� 0 SCRI 7ION NAME AND ADORESS � LOT BIOCK � 3 Kenneth F. and Gioria 0. Erickson 6110 Starlite Bouieva�d Fridley, Minnesota 55�+32 �� 3 Steven P. and Jane L. Va�bergen 61Q0 Starlite Boulevard Fridiey, Minnesota 55432 SYLVAN NILLS PLAT 3 AOOITIaN 10 1 `— _.4 lt i 12 1 13 � 14 1 15 i 1 2 2 3 4 2 2 2 : Edward �i.,Wette�berg . 175�Sylvan lane Northeast Frid�ey, Minnesota SSk32 . . � 1 , . .� , . . .. Aivin..�.�. Ricks 161`Syivan Lane Nartheast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 . William Zurbey 145 Sylvan Lane Northeast fridley, MinnesoL� 55�+32 Pau1 A. and Catherine M. Scherven 13� Sylvan Lane �iortheast Fridiey, Minnesata 55�32 Raydon E. and Hargit D. Honq 115 Sylvan lane Narthaast Fridley, Minnesota 554�2 Charies a. a�d Delores M. Sunde� 101 Sylvan Lane Northeast Fridley, Minneso4a 55432 Enmett L. and V. Jeane Rice 100 Sylvan Lane Northeast fridtey, Minnesota 55�32 Thomas E. and Mary A. Ha�tfiei 120 Sylvan Lans Northeast �� Fridley, Minnesota 55432 G�egory C. and Nancy Boynton 140 Sytvan Lane Northeast fridler, Hinnesota 55432 Bill D. and Betty J, Kleinschmidt ' i60 Sylvan lane Ndrtheast fridley, Hinnesota 55k32 ' � . _ _� � ' , ._ i , ' ; . .. � -3 � � CITY OF FRTO�.EY , PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL . STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 ANO 1973-2 (ADDENDUM N0, 2) � ', tEGAL DESCRI PTION NMtE ANO AOORESS � LOT gL4CK i SYIVAN HILIS PLAT 3 AOOITION ' S Merie 8. and Irene M. Lo�gerbone 180 Syivan Lane Northeast � - fridley, Minnesota SS432 - ' 6 2 Marvin E. and lucilte M. Anderson 6270 Jupiter Road Northeast ; ' fridtey, Minnesota 55�+32 "7 2 Donaid S. and Susan E. Sztuk � I, . 6260 Jupiter Road Northeast F�idley, Minnesota 55�32 � 8 2 Ciarance E. and Marjorie C. Skaaden ' - 6250 Jupiter Road Northeast . Fridiey, Minnesota 55432 �' g 2 Ra1ph M. and Magdalen E. Thanas ' 6240 Jupiter Road Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 ' 10 � ' 2 (Notices only) Keith B. and Signe N. Ha�t , b23� Jupiter Road tVorthsast ' . F�idley, Minnesota 55432 » 2 �" Claydon .!. and Marion E. Polzin . - 622p �upiter Road Northeast , Fridler, Minnesota SS432 �2 2 " Paul N. and Eva G. Quarnstran ' 6210 Jupiter Road Northeast Frid�ey, Minnesota 55432 ' �3 • 2. " Alouis H. and Agnes M. Hatier 6200 Jupiter Road No�theast � Fridley, Minnesota 55432 _ I .' . 1� . �. ._ ,. � �. �7 2 " 6e�ald E.._and Jayce M. Sitko b20�, Trinity Orive tdo�theast • F�i d1 ey, hii �nesota 55�+32 � ' and,� .; _- ,.: . Richard L...and 8everly M. Schitli�ger i 2k0.Rice �reek Boulevard ' Fri di ey, Hi r�nesota �$432 � �$ 2 " Morgan and Yialet D. Lind . 6221 Trinity Lrive No�theast 'i ' . Fridley, Minntsota 55432 �9 2 " Naltace R. and Beverty L. Hlavac I' 6231 Triniiy Orive hortheast _ Fridley, Minnesota 55432 ' ' CITY OF FRIOLEY PRECIMINARY ASSESSNEHT ROLI STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1973-1 ANO 1973-2 (ADOENDUM N0. 2) LEGAL OESCRI PTION NAFIE AFdO AODRESS ' LO BLOi.K SYLVAN NILLS PLAT 3 ADOITION 0 Notice onty) Clare�ce A. and Eunice H. Petersen 21 zz x3 24 2� 26 � 8 � t0 il 12 2 z 2 2 2 � 2 3 3 � 3 3 3 3 6241 i'ri�ity Drive Northeast fr�dley, MinnesoLa 55�+32 John C. and Gayte K. Hendrickson �51 Trinity Drive Northeast Fridley, Minr��sota 55432 Boriss A. and Maija Zile . 626i 7ri�ity Oriv� Northeast Fridiey, Minnesota 55�+32 John R. and Gloria R. Ivers b2T1 Trinity Orive Northeast fridiey, Minnesota 55432 Dorothy A. keule � 6281 Trinity Orive Northeast f�idiey, Mi�nesota 55432 Mau�ice A. and Jacquelin A. Packard 6291 T�inity Orive t�ortheast Fridley, Minnesata f5432 waiter F. and E�ain� R, Shupien �99 Trin�ty �rive Mortheast F�idioy, Minnesota 55432 George F. Alianson 620i Starlite 8outevard Fridiey, Min�esota 55432 Lester R. and Barbara L. Thorstad 621i Starlite Boulevard Fridley, Minnesota 55�32 Martin F. and Rose 8. Kasseth 6221 Startite Bouievard F�idlcy, Hinnesota 55432 Waiiace K. and Dorothy J. Searle 6231 Starlite Boulevard fridiey, Minnesota 55�32 Laimo�is and Ludviga Lendcins 6241 Starlite Boul�va�d • Fridley, Minnesata 55432 Arthur E. t�nd Lillian M. Kraft . 6260 7rinity D�ive Northeast . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 :3b ' 0 _ ' , : ' . • - � . . -3 CITY OF FRIDLEY � �, ' . PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL , , SiREET IliPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1913-1 AND 1913-2 (ADDENOUM N0. 2) � ' �EGAL DESCRI PTI ON KA�fE AND ADORESS _ LUT BLOCK SYLVAN HILLS PLAT 3 AODITION � ' Armande P and Mar L Au er ' 6 ' 7 ' 8 ' "9 ' t0 ' 11 ' 12 ' 13 ' 14 ' 15 ' 16 ' ' ' ' 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 63ti8 Starlite Boulevard g Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Roger A. and Karen M. Johnson 633b Startite Boulevard �'ridley, Hinnesota 55�+32 Elmer Isaksen 632G Starlite Bouleva�d Fridtey, Mirtnesota 55�+32 Carlson•Lavine, Inc. No�ris Eo and Ooris E. Knutsan 6300 Starlite Eouievard F�idiey, Minnesota SSk32 � Ctarence Eo and Della A. 4leinert 6260 Starlite Boulevard f�id�ty, Minnesota ��32 �� Myro� A. and Marty Sjostrom 6240 Starlite 8autevard Fridley, Ninnesota 55�+32 Carison-lavine, Inc. tkrbert N. and Be�nice 0. tleeser 6220 Starlite Boulevard F�idiey, Minnesota 55432 John M. and Gwen R. Gem10 6210 Sta�liie Bouleva�d Fridley, Min�tsota 55432 Cartson-Lavi�e, Inc. LOGIS PROjECT REPORT Prepared by: T. L. Willard Executive Director Approved by: D. G. Pos s Pre s id ent Date: Apri120, 1973 300 Metro Square Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612) 22 7-9421 1. 2. 3. 4. S. 6. 7. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Summary Organizational and Goals Development Evaluation of Information Systems Defining Needs of Members Defining the LOGIS System Employee Orientation and Training Financial Report Future Plans A.1 LOGIS Pre-history A . 2 Bibliogra phy A.3 LOGIS Membership APPENDIX ii Paqe iii 1 6 7 8 11 13 17 21 24 25 , ' ' � ' ' ' ' ' ' ' � Introduction The purpose of this report is to bring together under one cover the statements of policy, organizational objectives, and plans for achieving objectives as developed by the LOGIS members during the �i.rst three calendar quarters of existence of the organization. This document, therefore, represents a formalized compendium of LOGIS objectives and plans to date, including past and near-term projections of costs and accompli,shrnen�s . Summary Since LOGIS officially came into existence on May 25, 1972, the membership has accomplished much, The organization consists of ten municipalities, the State and the Metropolitan Council as participating members , with three counties and two villages as associate members. During this period the members have established their organizational framework, set goals and objectives , prepared plans for achieving obj ectives , developed operational phflosophies, established budgets, and moved down the path toward implementation . The LOGIS goal is: to develop a computer-based integrated management informa- tion system, built on a data base of automated routine municipal operations; in- dividually but simultaneously usable by multiple units of government; derived largely from existing systems; for operation under fixed price contract by a pri- vate service bureau or existing governrr�entally-owned facility. The objectives of the organization call for implementation of financial elements ' of the system (payroll/personnel, utility billing, general ledger accounting) on a test basis for one pilot city by mid-1973 , and on a full-scale basis by mid-1974. Projections indfcate that this may well be possible within the budgeted partici- ' pating member assessments of $10,810 each for 1972 and $16,225 each for 1973. These objectives are based on the assumption that systems developed by and through the City of Sunnyvale, California, are transferable to this area with ' relatively lfttle trouble. Detailed analysis of the systems under consideration support the assumption, Thus, it appears feasibie for LOGIS members to define system requirements, select a basic system, have it modified, installed, and , operational in the Twin Cit i es metropolitan area by or prior to the target date of mid-1974 within funds budgeted to date. To accomplish this, the decisional process need not be precipitous, but it must move forward at a predictable rate. , ' iii ' -1- SECTION 1 ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT: 1.1 LOGIS ORGANIZATION The joint and cooperative agreement forming LOGIS became effective May 25, 1972, and the first organization meeting was June 21 , 1972 , with Mr. Donald Poss , City Manager of Brooklyn Genter, serving as temporary convener. Since LOGIS is intended to serve the administrative needs of inem- ber agencies, all of whom operate under some form of "coun- cil-manager" government, the Board of Directors governing LOGIS consists of municipal managers . In accordance with the agreement, the following officers were elected to ssrve two-year terms: President, Donald G. Poss, City Manager of Brooklyn Center; Vice-President, Jack Irving, City Mana- ger, Cryst�l; Secretary-Treasurer, Robert T. Torvig, Execu- tive Director, Metropolitan Council; Director, john Cotting- ham, City Manager, Coon Rapids; Director, Chris Cherches , City Manager, St. Louis. Park. These officers comprise the Executive Committee of LOGIS . 1.2 DEVELOPMENT OF GOALS AND OPERATIONAL PHILOSOPHY The overall goal of the LOGIS organization is largely re- flective of the success of Sunnyvale, California , in follow- ing a somewhat unique methodology to achieve their inf.or- mation systems objectives . The LOGIS members, deter- mined to emulate that methodology to the extent practicable for this area, evolved the following goal statement: To de- velop a computer-based integrated information system, in-• dividually usable by multiple units of government , derived largely from existing systems , for operation under fixed price contract by a private service bureau or existing go- vernmentally-owned facility. This goal statement was a major determinant of the organi- ' zational philosophy which is to minimize stafL, minimize facilities ownership and minimize systems development cost . ' ' LJ � The goal of minimizing staff is to be achieved through max- imum reliance on personnel relationships ether than permanent employment with the LOGIS organizatiori. Examples of such relationships are: independent contract arrangements, the use of consultants, the use of personnel from other governmental agencies with reimbursement �f their employment costs to that agency by LOGIS. As of the date of this rep�rt, there are be- -2- tween three and four full-time equivalent employees serving the LOGIS organization, none of whom are LOGIS employees . The goal of minimizing facilities ownership is to be achieved through developing operational relationships under contract with existing computer facilities, such as private service bureau�, the Hennepin County Data Processing Genter, a state data pro- cessing center, a regional justice data processing center or some other data processing organization. In any event, the specific goal of LOGIS is to avoid direct or indirect ownership of a computer facility in the foreseeable future (approximately five years) unless it is not possible to obtain adequate service through other means . The goal of minimizing systems cost is to be achieved by ac- quirfng, and modifying as necessary, existing systems presently operational, re.g. , the Sunnyvale system) . In order to accom- plish this, it may be necessary to standardize some aspects of existing practices and operations of inember agencies . The LOGIS agreement permits substantial delegation of operational authority to the Executive Committee and through the Fxecutive Committee to an administrator for the organization. In order to minimize the time required of inember agency management person- nel, the operational philosophy evolved toward a"council-rrAana- ger" type of structure, with the LOGIS Board of Directors being analogous to the electorate of a community, the Executive Commit- tee analogous to a community's governing body, and an admini- strator for LOGIS being analogous to a city manager. 1.3 DEVELOPMENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK In order to implemen�t the "council-manager" concept of operation for LOGIS and conform to the legal requirements of the joint and cooperative agreement, it was necessary to develop bylaws, po- sition description, and administrative procedures that defined the character and extent of authorities that could be delegated to the Executive Committee and the administrator of the organization. Principa lly, the bylaws delegate to the Executive Committee , which consists of the five elected officers of the organization, complete authority for the administration and management of LOGIS , within the constraints of the budget adopted by the Board of Directors . In turn, the Executive Committee has de- legated responsibility for the day-to-day administration of the organization, under the general guidance of the President, to an Executive Director. The position description for the Execu- tive Director, along with administrative procedures governing such matters as purchasing, travel and expense reimbursement: �� ' � , CI� � � u ' C' ' ' LJ ' � , ' ,� I� ' -3- ' contracts for consulting services, cash management, and ' similar policies , have been adopted for gufdance of the Exec- utive Director. ' To advise the Executive Gommittee on matters pertaining to the functional operations of inember agencies, the President of LOGIS was authorized to appoint two standing committees: ' the Systems Evaluation Committee and the Training Commit- tee . ' 1 , ' ' ' ' 1 .4 ' � II I J� ' ' � The Systems Evaluation Committee consists of one represen- tative from each member agency and in most cases is the member agency's finance officer. The committee's primary responsibility to date has been to review in detail the oper- ations of the member agencies in light of system require- ments . The results of this review have been documented as the LGGIS Members Profile Analysis . The committee also re- views the project plans to ensure consistency with member agency operating objectives . The Training Committee, which consists of one representative from each member agency, has the responsibility of designing and implementing a comprehensive orientation and training pro- gram for LOGIS member agency employees . Training recom- mendations are reviewed by the Executive Committee for their a pprova 1 prior to implementation . The LOGIS organization is illustrated in Figure 1. DEVELOPMENT OF FINANCIAL POLICIES Tne LCGIS agreement provides very qeneral guidance in the al- location of costs for the administration, development, and oper- ation of a data processing system. There are three classifica- tions of such costs . First, administration. These are to cover the organization's general administrative and operational ex- penses not otherwise defined . The second classification is in- tended to cover the costs of design and development of computer programs and systems and other capital costs . The third class- ification of charges is to cover the costs of system operation and maintenance in serving members on an "as requested" basis . The agreement further provides that any new members to LOGIS are to pay a pro-rated share of the accumulated class 2 charges. After extensive debate concerning methods of apportionment of charges, e.g., considering population, ability to pay, probable extent of system usage, and other factors, it was the determination of the LOGIS Board of Directors that the system should be treated basi- r- i � � � � � °� � z 0 � a N Z a c� � 0 y (7 � J � � � w I F- � c� I N—� -----� ¢ � I I � I I I � -� I I � � W m � W � I " I �-- --�----� � � � � _ � � � � � � � ( � ( � � _ � � � � � � �I O ' ' 1 , � ' � L_J ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I�� 'I� ' ' ' , ' 1 , t -5- cally in the same manner as many utilities, i.e., the total cost of developi ng and administering the system is largely indepen- dent of the volume of usage by individual members but is rather a function of the number and diversity of users. Thus, the exist- ence of the system provides a benefit roughly equal to each mem- ber, and therefore, cosis for making the system exist should be proportioned equally to alI members, independent of other factors. Accordingly, the policy decision adopted by the Board of Directors was to allocate administrative costs and "capital charges" to mem- bers on an "equal shares" basis. After consideration of financing capabilities and what appear�d to be technically feasible, the LOGIS members evolved the following objective: To develop a multi-user, integrated, municipal manage- ment information system through the transfer of the Sunnyvale sys- tem for implementation on a test basis by mid-1973 and for full- s�ale use by mid-1974. To achieve this objective, a 1972 budget totaling $142 , 500 was adopted, anticipating $130,000 from assessments to members and $12 , 500 through in-kind contributions . Subsequestly, a budget for 1973 totaling $442 , 000 was adopted which projected $270,000 revenue from members , including an anticipated $75 , 000 from user charges . The balance of the projection was to be sought through grants and in-kind contributions . The revenue thus projected is intended to begin an integrated municipal information system that will rely for its data base on automation of general ledger accounting, payroll/personnel records , utility billing , purcha sing a nd inventory , equipment control, li- censing, fixed asset accounting, special assessment recor�s, pro- perty assessment, certain aspects of public safety, enterprise operations �municipal liquor stores , swimming pools , golf courses , and the like), voter registration and possibly others. In addition to the basic functional modules, the system is to eventually in- clude the capabilities for program planning and budgeting, com- puter modeling of the budget process , the effects of land-use plans , certain engineering functions and property assessment policies. In addition, a general computer time-share module is projected. Since many of the functional and operational modules outlined above do not yet exist, the near-term financing plans are projected to co- ver the following: general ledger accounting, payroll/personnel records , utility billing , equipment control, purchasing and inven- tory, program planning and budgeting, and the necessary operating software required by these functional modules . 1.5 SECTION 2 � Alternative sources of revenue which have been explored include the federal USAG program, the State of Minnesota, and indirectly, the National Science Foundation. All inquiries have been informal, and responses to date have been negative. �OO�tD-iNATION WITH LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS Every metropolitan area community with a population exceeding 8,000, as well as out-state cities of the second class, has been contacted for possible interest in the LOGIS project. Presenta- tions have been made to several member-agency governing bodies, as well as to the metropolitan area Finance Officer's Association. At the regional and state levels, presentations concerning the L,OGIS organization and its objectives have been made to the RE- T IS Board (Regional Justice Information System) , to the MINCIS Board (Minnesota Criminal Information System.l , and the the IISAC (Inter-governmental Information Systems Advisory Council? . In addition, an article was published in the League of Minnesota Municipalities magazine. Coordination at the federal level was accomplished by a presentation to the chairman of USAG �Urban Information Systems Inter-Agency Committee) . EVALUATION OF AVAILABLE SYSTEMS r l J ' � u ' � , ' ' 2.1 INTEGRATED SUNNYVALE INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS �ISISI ' A three step evaluation of ISIS was followed. First, an ad hoc com- mittee, consisting of technical, management and finance special- ists , reviewed documentation available for the Sunnyvale system , to determine its applicability to the LOGIS environment. Following a favorable report of that committee, a two day seminar was planned to permit an in-depth presentation by Sunnyvale representatives at a series of workshop discussions of the functional modules to be participated in by appropriate department heads from member agen- cies . In addition, the seminar included a workshop session on hardware and software considerations, using the Sunnyvale service bureau organization, Gptimum Systems, Inc., as the technical re- source. Following the Sunnyvale seminar and a favorable consensus toward the applicability of the system to this area, the Systems Evaluation Gommittee began a more detailed review of ISIS and GEMU- NIS. The latter is a generalized version of ISIS developed by OSI for simultaneous use by several municipalities whereas ISIS is de- signed for use by only one municipality. However, GEMUNIS has fewer functional modules than ISIS. The LOGIS system may include some GEMUNIS modules by purchase from OSI, and some ISIS modules, obtained (possibly without cost) from Sunnyvale. Elements of both systems may be used because the cost of generalizing ISIS modules for multiple users would exceed the cost of purchasing those already generalized by OSI. ' ' ' ' ' � ' 1 ' ' �J -7- 2 .2 OTHER GANDIDATE SYSTEMS ' In addition to the in-depth evaluation of the Sunnyvale system, a screening of a wide range of other candidate systems was conducted in varying degrees until it was determined whether ' or not the system was potentially applicable to LOGIS needs . Those which were evaluated included operating systems at Lane County, Oregon; San Gabriel Valley, California; Wichita Falls, ' Texas and Dayton, Ohio (USAC citiesl; and Cincinnati, Ohio. In addition, approximately twenty systems vendors and hard- ware suppliers were contacted concerning the potent.ial availa- ' bility of appropriate systems. These included IBM, Honeywell, Control Data Corporation, Univac, NCR, and Xerox, among the hardware suppliers (the latter two have operational systems that ' are potentially applicable and will be evaluated additionally in the future) . Service bureau and software firms included Automatic Data Processing of Minnesota, Scientific Computers, Inc., Aries ' Corporation, and Price-Waterhouse. In addition to this, the firm of Systems and Computer Technology, under contract to the State of Minnesota Department of Administration, reviewed software in ' the public domain for applicability to Minnesota cities . The re- sults of this survey were also reviewed. ' SECTION 3 DEFINING NEEDS OF MEMBERS , ' J ' ' ' ' ' ' 3.1 3.2 MEMBER AGENCIES CPERATING PROFTLE The first step in defining the needs of inember agencies is to esta- blish present practices and to determine the extent to which these practices differ among members and from the candidate system. This analysis was conducted by LOGIS support staff from the in- ter-governmental services division of the State of Minnesota in cooperation with members of the LOGIS Systems Evaluation Gom- mittee . The effort was completed February 19 , 1973 , and sub- mitted to the LOGIS ESCecutive Gommittee on March 9, 1973 , for its approval. NEEDS ANALYSIS The second phase to determine the needs of inember-agencies is scheduled to take place during the second quarter of 1973 and will consist of interviews with appropriate management team personnel in each member-agency to determine those aspects of inember operations which should be considered, either for incorporation into the LOGIS system or for accommodation in some manner when the member-agency is converted to use of the LOGIS system. SECTION 4 4.1 : DEFINING THE LOGIS SYSTEM PLANNING THE APPROACH As is the case with any major program, a substantial amount of staff and Executive Committee time was devoted to the process of planning the approach to achieving LOGIS objectives. Since planning is basically an iterative process with initial plans be- ing broad and general and successive iterations being more spe- cific as the feasibility of alternatives become more apparent, several levels of planning were involved during the period. The planning process required a careful d�finition o� the LnGIS en- vironment in the light of the organizational objectives stated previous ly . This environment includes the following requirements or constraints: a) LOGIS is a Minnesota organization and acquired systems must conform to Minnesota law: b1 The system must accommodate multiple users; c) An on-line system is preferred; d) The system should be integrated and be oriented toward man- agement information; e) LOGIS does not own or intend to own major computer hardware; fl LOGIS must plan for minimum technical staff. In the light of these considerations , the initial plan developed was embodied in a proposal to USAC for a planning grant to esta- blish a multi-user integrated municipal information system through the transfer of USAC products and others . That proposal was dated August 2, 1972 . As it became apparent that USAG fund- ing would not be available in support of the LOGIS program as pro- posed, an alternative plan was developed and adopted by the Exec- utive Committee in November, 1972 . This plan called for the de- velopment of comprehensive specifications for a system which would meet LOGIS objectives to a level of detail suitable for use as a request for proposal. Other aspects of the plan retained the needs analysis effort described previously and included a major component for employee training . Since the Sunnvale system was developed and is being operated by the firm of Optimum Systems , Inc ., of Palo Alto , California , and since that firm has developed a generalized version of certain as- pects of the Sunnyvale system, the plan recognized that the most likely candidate for development of the specifications would be OSI. In order to provide for independent technical overview of the OSI effort and their recommendations , yet meet the obj ective of minimiz- , C , C � �J ' ' ' C' C' � ' , , ' ' � � 4.2 � ing permanent LOGIS technical staff, the plan called for retaining ` the services of an advisory consul.tant to serve as a technical resource to LC3GIS. Finally, the plan calls for development of a deta iled implementation plan upon adoption of the specifications for the LOGIS system. ADVISORY CONSULTANT The Systems Evaluation Committee reviewed the qualifications and experience of approximately twelve candidate firms to serve in the capacity of advisory consultant. Major considerations were exAerience in municipal data processing, on-line systems, and the likelihood of the candidate firm being a potential operator of the system or vendor of system related hardware. It was con- cluded that in order to assure maximum objectivity on the part of the advisory consultant, firms who might be candidates for sys- tem operation or hardware sales should not be retained. A Systems Evaluation Gommittee selected four consultants from ' the candidate firms for recommendation to the Executive Committ�e . After interviews by a group consisting of the acting Executive Secretary, the Chairman of the Consultant Selection Subcommittee, ' and technical representatives of other agencies, followed by in- terviews with the Executive Committee, the firm of Intech, Inc. , was chosen as the Technical Advisory Consultant. � ' � ' �� ' C L1 � 4.3 SPECIFICATIONS PROTECT In deciding to develop systems specifications for LOGIS through a contractual relationship rather than to attempt a direct transfer of the Sunnyvale system per se, it was evident that the only firm in a position to develop those specifications at reasonable cost was the firm who had developed the system in the first place, i.e. Optimum Systems , Inc ., of Pa lo Alto , California . Accordingly . a detailed contract was developed with OSI and executed on February 28, 1973. In general, the contract requires OSI to pro- vide a definitive description of the capabilities and operating characteristics of an integrated municipal information system mod- eled after the Sunnyvale system and containing the same features and characteristics of that system except that it must be capable of serving multiple Minnesota municipalities . The product of the effort is to consist of functional operating and documentation spe- cifications, suftable in content and level of detail, to serve as a basis for detailed systems design. The description must address all required inputs and define all outputs provided by the Sunny- vale system as of the contract date. The contract has 120 calendar days in which to develop final specifications for the system, and - 10 - an additional two months are provided for LOGIS review and the contractor's final publication of the specifications . The contract provides for seven subsystems and appropriate oper- ating systems . The former are payroll/personnel, public utilities, general ledger accounting, public safety, licensing and permits , equipment control and purchasing/inventory. The contract also provides options for deleting subsystems, {e.g. , the requirements of the public safety module will pro- bably be met by REJIS, and therefore, this may be deleted) . If there are no deletions , the contract price is not to exceed $28, 600, and the terms call for compensation only upon com- pletion of the contract in a satisfactory manner. An optional extension of the contract is provided to permit preparation of a data dictionary consisting of either or both of two parts: an interpretive data dictionary which includes a data specifications table (a fixed form 'abbreviaied list showing each of the elements in a file displayed in a tabular array, one line per element) and a data specifications index �a fixed form tabular array showing the same information as the preceding table, but in alphabetical sequence) and a ge- neric data dictionary which is a free-form English narrative listing describing each data element in technical and functional or generic terms . If these options are exercised, an additional $10 , 000 would be committed . i� ' !J � � � � �' ' , � 4.4 PILOT PROJECT � As an adjunct to the Specifications Project, a separate and par- allel project has been established with the objective of gain- ing a preview of what the LOGIS system might do, of some of the changes that might be required to better meet member needs , of the operating costs and of some of the effects of system operation on the organization of a municipality. In addition, such a project would provide a training base for LOGIS member- agency employees and would provide the pilot agency an opportun- ity for interim production work on the automated system . The specific objective of the first phase of the pilot project is to place one LOGIS member-agency into production operation on payroll/personnel records processing by Tuly 1, 1973 , on the GEMUNIS system at OSI in California, via a telecommuni- cations network which will connect a remote terminal located in the offices of the LOGIS pilot agency to the OSI computer. If the first phase is successful, the project would be continued into a second phase which would place general ledger accounting and utility billing functions of the pilot agency on the California computer by Septem ber 1, 1973 . If stages one and two are suc- ' � � C ' � ' � -11- cessful, the project would continue into stage three, by placing a second pilot agency into operation on the three basic modules by December 1, 1973 . The experience gained through the pilot project will pro- vide input to the specifications development project and to the ultimate systems development. At the same time it will provide experience in the conversion of LOGIS mem- ber agencies into use of the system. All data input from the pilot agency would be through the remote terminal. In addition, inquiry responses would be delivered by means of that terminal. However, paychecks, payroll reports , and any other computer generated reports of significant scope would be printed at the computer cen- ter and delivered within twenty-four hours by means of the express mail service, through the U.S. Post Office. Progress to date includes execution of contractual arrange- ments for the computer service, the terminal, and the in- ter-state telephone service which is to be on a shared basis with Cargill, Inc., of Minneapolis. All required orders have been placed and installation is scheduled for May 1, 1973 . ' The city of Fridley has been selected as the first LOGIS pi- lot agency and its representatives along with two technical specialists assigned to the LOGIS project from other agen- ' cies, (�tate of Minnesota Department of Administration and Hennepin County Data Processing), are scheduled for orien- tation and training in California in April, 1973 . ' SECTICN S EMPLOYEE TRAINING ' The LOGIS program must also address the important require- ments of informing, orienting, and training the various mem- ber-agency employees who will be affected by the system, ' directly or indirectly. Under the direction of the standing Membership Training Committee, a five point program to meet the orientation and training requirements has been developed. ' �I ' ' 5.1 MANAGER TRAINING The chief administrator of each agency must understand the basic capabilities of information systems in order to better understand its potential as a tool for his operations, the problems in development of the system, and problems asso- ciated with its use. Accordingly, through the State Depart- 5.2 5.3 5.4 - 12 - ment of Administration's computer systems traininq program, a computer concepts training and orientation seminar was held on December 5-7 , 1972 . EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION An information system is as effective as employees of the user agency wish it to be. Since accuracy of data entered into the system and attitude of personnel toward the system are very important considerations , an orientation program for all member agency employees was conducted on January 29- February 2 , 1973 . A total of 975 employees of LOGIS member-agencies partici- pated in this program. MANAGEMENT TEAM SEMINAR The management team members, typically department heads of member-agencies, will be key to the successful implementa- tion and operation of the system . In order to give them a bet- ter understanding of information systems in general and the LOGI5 objectives in particular, a twelve hour seminar was attended by thirty-two personnel, representing member agency management teams. This seminar was completed March 27, 1973. PROBLEM ANALYSIS Certain key individuals in each member-agency will have pri- mary responsibility for introduction of the LOGIS system to their agency. Although they will have the assistance of trained conversion specialists for converting to the use of the system, it is of utmost importance that each of these key members re- ceive training in the rigorous analysis of problem situations in order that he may be prepared to methodically review the de- tailed office procedures, provide alternatives for those which would not be accommodated by the system, and provide the appro- priate procedures for introduction and use of the system. To accomplish this, it is planned to utilize a State Department of Administration training module on introductory systems analysis . This effort is scheduled for the second quarter of 1973. ' I_ I ' 1 � 1 � ' , �� , ' ' C' , � 5.5 APPLICATIONS TRI�INING ' As each member-agency is converted to the use of the system, it will be necessary to provide specific and detailed training to the employees of the agency who are directly involved in the use of the system. , ' SECTIC�N 6 6.1 - 13 - FINANCIAL REPORTS LOGIS STATEMENT OF REVENUE AND EXPENSE December 31 , 1972 REVENUE Member Dues Received Participating A.ssociate Sub-Total Balance Due from Members Participating Associate Sub-Total Other (Interest Earning�) TOTA.L REVEIVUE AND RECENA.BLES EXPENDITURES Personal Services Professional & Consultant Communication Printing & Publishing Training & Conference Travel Supplies TOTAL EXPENDITURES SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) C LAS S 1 8,910.00 300.00 $ 9,210.00 810.00 100.00 $ 910.00 $10,120.OQ $ 6,909,89 450.00 28.58 165.26 113.95 18.61 $ 7,686.29 $ 2,433.71 SUMMARY C LAS S 2 99,054.00 -0- $ 99,054.00 20,946.00 -0- $ 20,946.00 662.47 $120,662.47 CLA.SS 3 TOTAL �i � � 9,054.00 3,200.00 $ 12,254.00 _p_ $ 108 , 408, 47 _p_ 107,964.00 300.00 $108,264.00 21,756.00 100.00 $ 21,856.00 662.47 $130,782.47 $ 15,963.89 450.00 28.58 165.26 3,200.00 113.95 __�18 . 61 $ 19,94�.29 $110,842.18 Total Revenue & Receivables $130,782.47 Total Expenditures 19, 940.29 BALANCE OF UNAPPROPRIATED SURPLUS $110, 842.18 - 14 - 6.2 LOGIS BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31 , 1972� Glass 1 Ciass 2 Class 3 Assets and Other Debits Cash and Investments 1, 523 . 71 87 , 462 .47 -0- Interest Receivable on Investments -0- -0- -0- Accounts Receivable Members Dues 910 . 00 2 0, 946 . 00 -0- Fixed Assets -0- 12,254.00 -0- Total Assets and Other Debits 2, 433 . 71 120, 662 .47 -p- Liabilities , Reserves Fund Balances Advance fram Members -0- -0- -0- Reserves for Receivables 910.00 20, 946.00 -p- Fund Balance 1,523.71 87,462.47 -p- Accounts Payable -0- -0- -p- Members Investment -0- 12 ,254.00 -0- Total Liabilities , Reserves , 2, 433 . 71 120, 662 ..47 -p- and Fund Balance Total 88,986.18 -0- 21,856.00 12 ,254.00 12 3, 09,6 . 3 8 -0- 21,856.00 88,986.18 -0- 12,254.00 123,096.18 * LOG IS a ccounting for 19 72 is on a ca s h ba s is but will be converted to a n actual basis by mid-1973. � - 15 - ' 6.3 PROJECTED EXPENSES FOR 1973 ' The following tabulation of expenses for 1973 represents an administrative "best guess" as to what can be accomplished within the adopted LOGIS budget. Present financing plans ' a ppear to be ca pable of ineeting a 11 commitments for admini- strative services, exercising all options within the specifica- tions development contract, conducting the pilot project to , maximum scale throughout 1973 (with all costs carried by LO- GIS1 , conducting the necessary parallel investigation, and purchasing, modifying as required, and installing for operation ' on a local computer, a basic LOGIS system. Such a system would be integrated and would permit operation in the program planning and buc�geting mode. ' , ' ' ' � ' ' ' �r � ' � ' - 16 - PROJECTED LOGIS EXPENDITURES FOR 1973 (as of March 31, 1973) E�PEI�TS£ TT£.M CLASS 1 CLASS 2 CLASS 3 TOTAL Personal Services 2 8, 700 2 0, 000 48 , 700 Professional and Consulting 2, 000 58, 000 60, 000 (Legal, Consultant, Contractors) Communications 300 4,200 4,500 (Postage , Telephone , Data Communications) Printing and Publications 1, 500 1, 500 Training and Conferences 1, 000 1, 000 Travel 1,000 1,500 2,500 Office Supplies 1; 500 1, 500 Rent (Office, Computer Services , 900 12 , 400 13 , 300 Equi�ment) Furnishings , Equipment , and 500 140 , 000 140 , 500 Software Purchases Metro Council Expense, 1972 2, 500 2, 500 Contingincy GRAND TOTAL 1972 Surplus and Receivables 1973 Assessments GRAND TOTAL 7,543 22,308 47,434 258,408 REVENUE 2,434 108,408 45,000 150,000 47,434 258,408 29,842 -0- 305,842 110,842 195,300 -0- 305 842 � j' SECTION 7 , �J � , � ' � � � � �� ' ' ' ' - 17 - FUTURE PLANS Figures 2, 3, and 4 outline the principal LOGIS decisions that must be made :�uring the coming months, and a schedule for these events which would permit achieving the LOGIS objective. The key decisions are the selection of a system to be acquired (either through purchase, lease, or new development) , the selection of a contractor to supply the system, and the selection of an agency to operate the acquired system. Since each of these decisions involves major policy determination by LOGIS members, the schedule must be considered with the decision xnaking process in mind. If an existing system, such as Sunnyvale�GEMUNIS, is suitable for LOGIS with minimum modification, the schedule as outlined is realistic and attainabie. If major development is required, at least a year must be added to the schedule. If ac- quisition of a system and the selection of an operational agency for the system follow the process of advertising requests for quo- tations, evaluation of competitive responses, and ultimate con- tract definition and award, approximately six months would be added to the schedule . The objective of establishing a contractual relationship between LOGIS and an operator of the LOGIS system may pose some dif- ficulties . Operators may be faced with fairly long lead times as a result of the necessity to add memory capacity, b�come famil- iarized with the system, and get it operational on their computer. In addition, because of the geographic separation between the system supplier and the presumed system operator (located in the Twin Cities metropolitan area) , the development of local exper- tise for trouble shooting and system maintenance may be difficult. It will be necessary to decide whether to rely on consulting ser- vices for such technical skills or on the technical staff of the systems operator. In order to minimize delays in the process of selecting an oper- ating agency, it would be appropriate to begin at an early date with the eva luation of implementation a lternatives . The ta sks required to accomplish this would consist of: ai deveIoping LOGIS City, a composite of municipal test data representing the full range of requirements of LOGIS mem- bers; b) evaluating each alternative for system implementat ion in terms of feasibility and schedule implications; c) developing a pro-forma contract governing system operation. W .--i � � � � � � 0 N C%� .. �� u � � � c7 O a U , ., � � w � •�� ' �o� � � ��H U O z b � W � � i� � �.:� �' W � � �d �� o � �a � � � O z � � � � �� a �' � •�w �" � �'�od � W aa �1C � •� '� z� �� W o „ � � � �+ � o � �� 0 a w � O �� . ,n� z d•°r� � � � �� G C7 ��O � w �a � � .� � �� U � N � �/] W O z a `� w �' o�o y+ �oo �� a A � �O '�aa� � a Y3 �i � ast t/aU rx o O Z 8 �, � w � �° � .° �+ .� � � � � � d I � z � � � � w � �� •O .,�� y, � 'Q � � L� � �b 0 � 0 � / � � � �, �� i c �---� � � a� , � � o � � �� >� UO a � � � � �� a. � �W � � � � a .° � z° z° �� z �'� r� � v1 a� W -+� +; W `_' �+ a�i � � y. � a; / c+� �+ U�D � � � � � %" d M � � � � � --� � - �� W � W \\ � � H a� Q x � c7 Z Z � Z o a a N � W w� O � a y � � J Y U � O. N � b+ 7 Q � � �-. N � 7 h ti.., 01 � '� N � M n T .ti N ro � .n a� w c ro � U � > O z U � a� G N � F. 10 � � C N y � � o. u� F' .,�� ro [ � ° o. c � � m � ° � � ° N ..� � U C C C 7"., O � m v � ro � m °� a� � ro '� °� � a' o a ,� o+ ., U y �>� z. � ; � o. Y a°'i o, �� o Q.c. °> o p U ,J m U w .r � C i+ G tJ � Z i.. � N .''Y'�. N U C O p �.. .''�- ro y U � ,A ro o� 3 A� H�C ro a w�,� o F � a� a E' w. � a a: � �� c q d � o � �" � a' 'o a� .: v a �� a' � c a c� ay � �' �' a`°' a� o' � A E° p ° a' .� a°`° o.. W o a� �� a �.-. c� r� �' ro o;a o.a o� U a �,�n, rn�, �.. cn ..� �, ... a� a' .� r, ., ro o y� N � b Y � N"o a� �' G a m ro m� N�� >' N o cq>��' �. y�, �, �a�� Q �; �� i a w� c�n c�n c'''n � U A� � U(1 cn U� C� � p�„ c� � F- +� +� �� . . . � � . . � . � . �� . . , , y, . . . ; �. , a. , �. . � , . , . m . � ' LJ ' ' ' ' ' CJ ' ' ' ' ' , ' ' � , -21� APPENDIX A.1. LOGIS PRE-HISTORY Since 1969, a substantial level of effort has been expended for the investigation and development of a general body of concepts related to the us e by municipa lities of computers and computer-related technology. These concepts involve the use of municipal operating data to feed an integrated operationally-based computer system in such a way as to produce, as the by-product of such operations, timely man- agement and planning reports. Many of the reports attain- able from such a system have not previously been available to municipal management personnel because of the massive task of gleaning the necessary data manually from files scattered throughout the operation. Availability of such re- ports , a s well a s the automation of certa in municipa 1 data handling functions , is expected to provide the following be- nefits: an improved mschanisrr� fon tYte deliver� of services; t�e prospect of control by management over the seemingly in- evitable increase in the cost of municipal operations; a body of operational�y significant information concerning municipal activities which is readily accessible to all who need it; the potential for a truly effective system for management direction a nd control . 1 A second aspect is the concept of "transferability. " This de- rives from the fact that computer-based information systems are extremely costly to develop and usually are tailored very close- ly to the operating methodology of the user organization. The concept is to design systems in such a way as to permit their transfer to municipalities in any part of the country at a fraction of the cost required for each municipality to develop its own systems. A major investigation and development effort has been in progress for several years under sponsorship of a federal coordinating body called USAC. This program was established in six free-standing cities in the United States in the population range of 100,000 and over. However, many smaller municipal- ities, particularly rapidly growing suburban municipalities in large metropolitan areas, are faced with problems of rapidly in- creas'ing concern by the citi�enry over the cost/benefit char- acteristics of municipal services. Yet these municipalities typically have even fewer resources than larger cities to aid in the objective analysis of operating systems. Thus, man- agement of such municipalities is bften largely by intuition and in response to crises. The combination of rapid growth plus in- creasing pressure to ke�p operating costs down preciudes the addition of staff personnel to do the necessary planning for the future in many areas of operation. In addition, the scope of ].. "City Hall's Approaching Revolution in Service Delivery, " Nations Cities, January 1972, P. 11. - 22 - operation and the limited tax base of the smaller muncipal- ities make it virtually impossible for individual municipalities to develop computer-based systems and, in fact, to use any but the simplest of computers for their operations . Recognizing the difficulties of the situation, a group of inetro- politan area finance officers and their respective managers in 1969 sponsored a feasibility study to determine whether oper- ating economies could be gained through establishing several computerized applications for certain routine muncipal opera- tions, either through the use of available county computers or through the purchase of "mini-computers ." This effort led to a limited -scale technical study early in 1971 . At about this same point in time, the State of Minnesota Department of Ad- ministration and the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area jointly sponsored a feasibility study of inter-muncipal co- operation for automated data processing. The study was con- ducted by Systems and Gomputer Technology Corporation at a cost of approximately $84,000, excluding "in-kind" labor. During the course of this study; SCT conducted systems anal- ys�s in four Minnesota municipalities and two counties util- izing USAC municipal systems analysis techniques . The re- sult of this study was a four-volume document entitled, "A Plan of Action for Developing an Integrated Data System for Minne- sota Municipa lities and Counties ." The plan provided for a to- tal program approximating 2.7 million dollars over a four�ear period. It was presented to Minnesota municipal representa- tives and representatives of USAC late in 1971 . In order to decide between the alternatives af fered as a result of the Municipal Feasibility Study and the State/N!etropolitan Study, and to gain further understanding of the concepts related to an integrated data system, and the manner in which an infor- mation system affects the operations of a municipality, a sub- committee of inetropolitan area managers conducted a tour of s evera 1 municipa lities in early 19 72 . The area s vis ited were Eu�ene, Oregon, in Lane County, which had a municipal-coun- ty joint data system, Sunnyvale, California . which has an inte- grated municipal information system, the San Gabriel Valley, California , area where a joint powers organization of thirteen municipalities has put a number of data processing applications into operation , a nd Wichita Fa lls , Texa s, one of the USAC cities . As a result of the tour the managers became convinced of the need for integrated information systems and unanimously rec- ommended to their colleagues the formation of a joint powers 1 C ' 1 ' 1 ' ' � C ' ' , u � ' ' � ' ' ' - 23 - organization in Minnesota for the purpose of pursuing the ' development of such a system. Accordingly, a joint powers agreement was drafted by a committee of managers and sub- , mitted to seventeen governmental organizations for consider- ation. Eleven of the thirteen municipalities that formally considered the agreement became members of the organization. ' Two counties indicated their intent to participate as asso- ciate members, and both the State of Minnesota Department of Administration and the Metropolitan Council participated t as full members . The organization agreement became effec- tive May 25, 1972 and the first organizational meeting was held june 21 , 1972 . ' ' C ' ' , , ' ' , ' ' t -24- A.2 BIBLIOGRAPHY "A Proposal for a Planning Grant to Establish a Multi- Municipal Information System through the Transfer of USAC Products and Others ", LOGIS Report, August 2, 1972 . LOGIS Pilot Project, LOGiS Report, March 21, 1973 . Member Agencies Operating Profile, LOGIS Report, February 19, 1973. LOGIS Administrative Manual, May 1, 1973 . I � N I � � � r�a � � a�i � � -a .� � � a•� a..� � � � � � w U � �*'� �� °� Q�� °� �' � �x °� �a � �:�U � � � � � o r�o � � � s N � � U �' F,U�1� r0a°r� � t� �, a rz° � � o •.-� � -� s.. p � ¢, � � N � W N� Q �.�., ,� �.4 i�� oi � +�-� p � � � R3 � � . ..� � s.�.� � a�i �x °> ��`'Q � � �`'U �a � *' � �--� o � ,�; � • � � � > ; � �, o�,� o•., .� z U �o .� �o o .� �nUaUZ� ��, � � xrz a a� .°�� , � °� � � a., � a �n O N .� � U -�' � v� � s.., N � a O � � O H .� � � � � � � � � � 0 � � � � W W Q � f� � Q � � O ,� � .^'—� � W � � '� � � � � � � � � � N m � r� � � � a Q � Q�.� N Q � Q O� S.. O �,' � cn � � '�i , � � � �.'' � -•.�i � �"i ��-1 � d� � r.-� s-+ � N N� � r' '�, � � � � � .�,� A � � t�-. t�-� �, p = aU��rx° °�', � m wa° � a � � � � � � �� u� � � � a, � .�' � N � � a� � � � � � ax o-� �x Q � � o � o ��U�u� � z� � � � � � s.�. O O� U.0 t�0 � .0 ,� � rp Q Q Q O ra O� � � � a Q ( � � O ( � '� � � � O �� '� c � w a� � _� NI �0 �� P� �.� _'., � r-, � I w O � Q � Q �. � � +� � x J. s'�.� -r'.i r�0 � � +' N � � N .-�� Q�,, � V] � � � � w � 0.� .� '�, � � � +' � � � � "-' � cn O +� .,�,� � � O � U .�..+ G' � a � � '� � � � 0 � � ..-� C/] o , � , � `.,�° Q' � a�'i a�i ,.°� o � � x o �� a � � H N ° ° 0 N a�i � '� ° *�' � � � o v�i o � � � b� Oy, Oy,,, p s-' "LS T3 s.'�'. � .i...� � '�' � s-+ O�� ra � � aamUUww u.. C� v�� Z oa�Cxrz a s.zaquzay� sa�eraoss�