The URL can be used to link to this page

02/09/1976 - 5440HELEN FAGIN SECRET/�RY TO THE �OtJ�lC�L , PUBLIC HEARI�JG FIEETI�JG FEBRUARY 9, 1976 _ _ _ � ��.. ' . -�� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING � � � � �LEASE SIGN NAM AqDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: -��y, �� /�7,6 �VAh1E ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER �____= __________ ____________ f =_____________— ___—_ �__________________� ___________—____=______ � �'7z,, ,.� i� � a�� , � //� - �//� ��J � �� , I �- oz. � �� m � �=�� 117- 7 � � � .��9 �„ �'�„ ,F� i i � � i1� ��. -- � �T, ��7 �� ►� r� i!� .�s......." �� c �. � . � / /�i�.`/�//`�i�=l�.11� ��i.�i� r� —�I _ _ � � � • u �-. V i � —v �i ».�,li v� �/.� � � r-n�� '��7�3.n \ �— � f� �// � w--� �%oC� JV�DO!^� �z/'C� //!� �� ;? / 7U /�' � v �� j ��iiG� l / � _ �d �—� U �—Z� �- � � .� ' � �,n��(t �'p: D f'ARTMEPJT HEADS F llowing are the �CTIONS NEEQED. Pl�ase have your answers in the City Mfanager's ffice by f�ednesday tJoon, Februar•y 1�, 1976 ' 1. � FRIDLEY CITY COU��CI� - I'UBl�IC i-IE�lR��JG h1EETING - FEBRUAftY 9, 1976 - 7:30 P.l•1, 1 � PLED E OF A� LEGIANCE: 7:35 P.r�. '. ROLL CALL: ' All Present ADOP� IO« OF AGENDA ; Add: Openi na of B� �s for General _Obl i aa±i on Bonds t— at 8:00 P.M. P,dv�t�d as amended. � VISIT R: DI�CUS IOPJ: SPJOt�J PLOI�JIPIG: �EPdIOR CITIZE�I F/\CILITIES: TRAi�SPORTATIO^! FACILITIES: Mr. Ca 1 Nelson, se��ior c.itizen discussed possibi�ities of snew-�lowinct ri�+ges of dri��ew ,vs; a meetina place for senior eitizens; �nd means of transportation facilities NGTNE£RING A TIC�N NEEDED: i'or the Cit,y of Fridley. R view snow-plowing pol�cies far any possib�e imp•rovements, any prepare a cost nalysi.s for dr veway ridges plowi��g after checking �ith Edir�a on their experience.(Conf. Meeting _ _ __ _ �� .---�--^y_ —JREC IVING THE �'�INUT�S JF TNE �PE.CI�L PU.�'s��C ��EARi1VG PLANNING ' e�� OM ISSION �'�EETTNG QF �ANUARY 7$, 1�i6 � , � � � � � � , � � 1 - 1 � 1 NGINEEkING ' ' � ' N�_GTNEERITJG � � ' Rec ived the minutes ef the sr�ecia� Public Near�nrf Planning Commission Mee i nc� of Jan . 28, i 976 . A TION NEEDED: File for fut��re r�ference CON I DERAT I ON OF APPR(�V�,L OF F I NAL PLt�T �JBD I V I S I ON P�� %�-O�, BY LEIF IiENRIE:SEh, GENERALLY LQCATED W�ST OF EAS RIVER ROAD AND SOUTH vF LOGAN �ARKNlAY� ►�� Mo ion to table ap�roval of final �lat subdivision P.S.�`,f75-0?_ u�til th r�eetinc� of ��tarcfi 15, i976, AC ION NEFDE�: Put on Agenda cf Nlarch �5, i97E „ 2 - 2 � � � . � ' � ' � ENGINEERifJG , ' ' � 1 �INEERING , PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, FEBRUARY 9, 1976 I�iE�y� ��SIi�ESS i�ONTINUED) PACE 2 CONSIDERATION OF EY.ECIlTION OF AGREEMENT WITH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL D I STR I CT �1�-� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � � 3 - 3 � h9otion to approv� execution of Agreement with Indeqendent School Distri t #14. Unanimous. � A�T ON NEEDED: Have agreement executed and filed COf�SI ER�TION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING iMPROVEMENT, APPROVA�. OF PLA(�S AND QRDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: �IATERf SANITARY SEVdER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PF20J ECT #119 , , , , , , � , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ��-�B Res�lutir�n m15-1976 a��proved to �rder imnrovement, ap�roval of nlans anu ord ring advertisement for bids, Water, Saniiary Sewer and Storm Sewer P oject #119. ACiI N NEEqED: Proceed as authorized ' CONSI ERA7ION OF A RESOLUTiON ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, ��I�'PRO AL OF PLANS AND GRDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: , �TREE �MPROVEh1��!T pRQJECT �T. �976-I� � � � � � � � � � � � 5 - 5 B Reso1 tion #16-1976 - approvin� olans and orderin� advertiser�ent for bids - treet ImprevemPnt Project ST.1976-1, E It�EERING ACTIO NrEDED: Proceed as authorized RECEIVI G BIGS rUR GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS. ;��1� "14 �� , P10TI0�1 o reeeive Bi� �2, Allison-blilliar�s Co„Inc, Minn, Mn, at the Net Int rest Cost: $�+11,067.50; Plet Interest P,ate: 5.0906%, U�on a roll c�ll vote, t e vote was unanimous. i, �r��'A?��C� :'�';iI�)i� EED�D: Inform L�idde�s of Council action ---- - t�D�;i��Rf��: 9:50 P.h1. ' ( � ' ' , � ' ' �, , ' I , � ' ` SALE: BID SUMi�1ARY SHEET $1,550,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUND BONDS OF FRJDLEY, h1TN�dESC�TA HELD ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1976, AT 8:00 P.M. u � �/ ��i BID tt , NET I��TERES7 COST: $ �f � -// � � -� _; NET INTEREST RATE: > ' ��'��° Account htanager: JURAN & MOODY, INC., ST. PAUL, P�tIfJNESOTA Account Member: First National Bank of St. Paul, Minnesota • blerrill Lynch, Pierce, Feriner & Smith, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota Paine, Webber, Jackson � Curtis, inc., t4inneapolis, Minnesota E. J. Prescott & Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota �,C�,L�C��`� BID � c�� , NET INTEREST COST: $ �� /, �S � _; NET INTEREST RATE: --`D�D�n % Account t4anager: ALLISON-WILLIAMS CO^'PANY, INC., MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA � Account hlember:, American National Bank & Trust f,ompany, St. Paul, Minnesota Dain, Ka?man & Quail, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc., Minneapolis, Mirnesot3 Moore, Juran & Company, Minreapolis, t+linr�sota '" Ptational City Eanky hfinneapolis, Minnusota Robert�—C—Peie�se�; ��c,-,-�7i-nneapeli-s.,-Minnesota BID ;i<� _, NET INTEREST COST: $��•_5 �) _; NET INT[REST RATE: -��D1C_�t % Account Manager: BANCNORTHWEST, P4INNEAPULIS, MIPlNESOTA Account P1ember: First National Bank & T;°ust Compariy, Oklahoma City, Ok'lahoma Cronin & Marcott2, Inc., P4inneapolis, Minnesota White tdeld & Company, Inc., P1inneapolis, t4innesota Marquette National Bank, Minneapolis, Minnesota EHLERS AND ASSurIATES, INC. FINANCIAL COi.SULTANT� TO THE CITY fIRST NATION,4L-SGO LINE CONCOURSE 507 ffJ�RQUETTE AVLtJUE h1INi�EAPOLIS, P1IflNESOTN 55402 TELEPHONE: (612) 339-8291 , '� � } � ' ' � ' ' NOTICE OF SALE $1,550,000 SP�CIAL ASSESSMtNi Ft1ND BONDS CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota will meet a the City Hall, 6431 University Avenue NE, in said city, on Monday, February 9, 1976, at 8:00 o'clock P.M., C.S.T., to receive, open and consider bids for the pur has� of $1,550,000 negotiable coupon, general obligation bonds of the city ort the following terms: . Purpose and Security Th� purpose of the bonds is to finance loc�l improvements that are to be paid for in whole or in par� from sp�cial assessments, all in accordance with Section 7.12(d) of the city s home rule charter. The bonds will be general obligations of the issuer, for which its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged. � The bonds w and wiil ma Y�ar Date and Maturities ' il be dated February ]., 1976, will be in denominations of $5,000 each ure on February 1 in the follawing years and amounts: 1977 $1 5,000 1978 1 5,000 1979 I S,OOU I9$0 1 5,000 1981 1 5,000 Year , I982 1983 �984 19fl5 1986 Amount $175,000 175,OOQ 1�5,00� i5,000 25,000 Year Arr�unt � 1987 $25,000 1988 25,000 1989 25,OOQ 1990 25,000 � i � � Redemption Feature , Sonds matur'ng in ihe years 1987 through 1990 will each be subject to redemption � and prepaym nt at the option af the city and in inverse numerical arder on ° ; February 1, 1986 and any interest paymen� date thereafter at par plus accrued interest. , Interest � Interest o on each �'e interest f the rate s rates may of 5/lOQ a issue may the bonds will be payable on August 1, 1976 and semiannually thereafter uary 1 and August 1. A1l bonds maturing on the same date must bear m date of issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding cified for bonds of any subsequent maturity. Not more than 14 interest specified for the issue. Each rate must be in an integral multiple 1� and no rate of in�erest nor the net effective average rate of the ceed 7� per annum. No supplemental or "B" coupons will be permitted. i ' Paying Agent Principal nd interest will be made payable at any suitable bank in the United � States designated by the success.fui bidder within 48 hours after award of sale, I' subject to approval by the city, and the city will pay the reasonable and eustomary paying age cy charges. ' � � � ,,� , •-'� _ ' � � CUSIP Numbers The city will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser wa ves any extension of the time of delivery caused,thereby. �Within 40. da purchaser or by him and a �to the purch of bond coun ing their va must be paid ,purchase pri deposit with the day of p � �An unqualifi Lefler, Pear will be prin will state t 'and the city thereon as t � Sealed bids �r 'prior to the accompanied b payab7e to th the bid is ac ,the lowest ne less any cash will be deeme 'for principal city reserves any bid. , ' , Further inf ASSOCIATES, 507 Marquet TAX EXEMPTI 'municipa cor federa1 incoR individuals. � Dei i very s after sale the city will furnish and deliver at the office of the at his option, will deposit with a bank in the United States selected proved by the city as its agent to permit examination by and to deliver ser the printed and executed bonds, the unqualified opinion t�hereon el and a certificate stating that no litigation in any manner questian- idity is then �hreatened or pending. The charge of the delivery agent by the purchaser but all other costs will be paid by the city. The e must be paid upon delivery of �he bonds or within five days after� the delivery agent, in funds available for expenditure by the city on Legal Opinion d legal opinion on the bonds will be furnished by Messrs. LeFevere, on, 0'Brien and Drawz af Minneapolis, Minnesota� The legal opinion ed on the bonds at the request of the purchaser�. The legal opinion at the bonds are vaiid and binding generaT obligations of the city is obligated and required to levy taxes for the principal and interest e same become due without limi� as to rate or amount. Ty�+� of Bid � Amount ast be mailed or delivered to th� undersigned and must be received :ime of said meeting. Each bid must be unco�ditional and must be i a cashier's or certified eheck or bank draft in the amount af $31,000, � City Treasurer, to be retained by the city as liquidated damages if .epted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The bid authorizing : interest.cost (total interest from date af bonds to stated maturities, premium or plus any amount less than $1,550,OQ�0 bid far principal) � the most favorable. No oral bid and no bid of less than $1,520,000 plus accrued interest on all of the bonds will be considered and the the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informality in ,, BY OR�ER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Marvin C. Brunsell - Assistant City Manager/Finance Direetor nation may be obtained from and bids may be delivered to: EHLERS AND dC., Financial Consultants to the City, First National-Soo Line Concourse, Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesata 55402. Telephone: (612) 339-8291. )N:.�� Tn the opinion of counsel the interest on bonds issued by Mirrnesota iorations is tax exempt under U.S. Treasury regulations for determining � tax and under Minnesota law for determining Minnesota income tax for E _ �. . pl � -- � � �, ��'• s : :� - �� R`U .� . - . '�. , ' .� { � , ' . .. '�^:�. � �� _ - - y� . . �. � �:: .'� .: K�, � ... ;' . . . . City o ey (�ING COtfP�1ISJI`!��.�rFCI�1L P�JQ!_IC NE/�RING ME�TING - JAhUI�RY 28, 1976 :.� -. � , . . TO ORDEri: �-' 0 Cha-i rm�� :� ,�,�}►�� =•�� l ed i:he mee�:i ng to order at 7:35 P.M. CALL: _- . PAGE .1 1 ��;i�t.�� .�' �':�.��:;;,,:` Scott, Bergman, Harris, EJah�uer�� Langenfeld Members ��':�sent: Peterson Otl�ers ` f��sent: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner _ _ Dick Sobiech, P�ablic l��orks Director �;� tl , � �s �,Ray Leek, Planning Interne � ' `Nancy Reeves, Metropolitan Council . ._ Qarbara Shea, Vice Chairperson, Human Resources Commission C `• K w �P!!_ �IC HEAIZrN�= I)N"`(HE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE��NOUSI�G PL�N 1:OTTON by Scott, seconded by Berqm�r.. that the Planning Commission open th Public Hearing on the proposed Comprenensive Housing Plan. Upon :i voice vo:e, a1I voting aye, Chairman Iiarris opened the Public Hearing at 7:38 P.M. ""'"i�ir.`�`Jerr�1'�`"Boardman, City Plan�er, gave the i'ollo�ing presenta�;ion on �#� ,��:;.�n�sed �e��ensiv�e Housing Plar�. ma ' ' a t� " � ._.�1 :� � � Housing �vas a basic need to provide good o,uality life for any human being. s�ng was one of the largest single investments thut �ny person would probab�,y � in their lifetime. When people look for nousinc, there ��rere several t��inas y they were looking for, suc�i as health, sec�rity, �ocial relations, statu;, ^�t;nity fucii':ites and services, privacy, access and �nvironment. T"esc scr��?c_s al1 basic to the quality of life. For this reaso;;, ii: was import..nt that ��;e n for housing. This was the pur�ose of the Ce��preher�si�✓e Housing Flan. ��:�� • The Comprehensive Nousing Plan ��las made u� of tr�r•ee arels. The f:rst , � � Q�^��; ��.��urvey--and analysis, which was cor�pr�is�u o� a survey of exisi,;irg h�a �s�n� costs, pasthousing �:rends, expected it�_tur� h+�using trends, if }1��y � - e like ast trends, as well as sociai-economic conditions in the co�lnr,�<t;i�y. cc�,t�riu p �� ' ' These,.l:ogetf�er ��rii;h the housing yoals that have been laid aut by the commu!�it;y, a�. the main tiirust in implementing ih�s pian. The implem�ntation proce�s 1-�Gs �•: ';-.,� ,�t° ;ri� ortant aspect o% the plan. There �,ras no re�l need for the p]an if it Y � • � � c ul<1ii't a� implen�eni.ed. � ' -�o �a�;e a clos�r-look at the p1an, the fir•st. �hing that should,_ be d�scussed ' __ - - w s th�_ gro��:; �rti,�,ds in th� commui�ity. Tlie po��u►ation gains for Friiiicy :�,�er�F� . :,�� a.�:e extr��sive fram 195U to 19G0 ai�c1 up i�o 197J. lJe �re seeing a 1eve� �nn off ' ' ..� o- o�n° ro{?��lation ��hich was simi lar 1:0 �vhat had happene�t in Colum':�a f,�,,..;E, ; - wi�re their population pe�F;ed oui; in 1970. WE ex,cct i�ridley's populaL�ior: �_c- -.�. �;,k oi!t, in 1�u0 io 1990. �d;Lh this, tive �r�11 � ir,o our� ��:c;��ul��t;ei� st-.��l i�, iri�: ar�d :xs��y even see son�� reduci;ion of population. tie saia that an impor�ant i�!c`:��r r i�at our communit was maturinc�. In 1960 t.h� med�an ac�e i;� Fridle_,� ;;��s w s t. Y �. 2,II and t�,y 1910 i t was 22.0. Tf�is n�eans 1:haL tti�re has t�cen a d��op i;� ,,,,�,.,;�,r;s ' b t�,reen 0 to l8 years olci and an increase in thc� nirm�er uf pe��le bet.�:r:.c:. it; t� �� ,. G, ��,e tliing that avas not character�i st �!� o�° a c►af.u��z r�y c�mmuni ty t!� :�. ;•:r ;:�:v� � ,." „� ;,f�� :1as in the eTclerly. Altitougii the eldc�rly �•lere :neri�asin� at t� . :; ^ ::� :� �;<�, �:";.;��...ra;,, was 'L.i in 1�G0 and 2.1 in �i�7��. We !�� anticinatrd ; . ::� , �`� � ' t• i;e oi' gro�7�;1 �in the over G5 age group. ' .. �� Li � � � , � �� Pla�nninc� Commission Special Pub_iic HearincZ Meetinq-January 28 976 Paqe 2 1 .� In this Comprehensive Housing Plan there are maps showing the social ch� racteristics of Fridley. These map series are somewhat confusing , but we are making changes on.the maps to make them n�ore.clear. The first map sh ws the percentage of population in block groups 65 years of age or more. Th larges�: concen�:ration of the elderly was along University Avenue and So th of 61st Avenue where about ?_0% of the people were elderly, but actually th elderly were�pretty much spread over the community in a range of 0 to 5%., el lo us Me th th th 25 th as tn fe ai ap �T J A a 1 a a Another social-economic condition in the community was the poverty lPv� . incomes. We have a map showing where households be�ow poverty level are � ated with 0-5% of the population and 5- lU/ of the population. t�letro ncil has another indication of lo�v and moderate income housinq which ",ey for a lot of their funding review and this �vas belo��J 50io of the ".:� ro median income. There was a map in this plan sho►,ring a breakdown of s giving the areas of 10-20% and 20-40% ►�vhere incomcs were below 50%.of Metro median income level. Some other pe"rtinent infiormation we ha�e in 's plan as to low and moderate income housing was that we have approximately households below the federally defined poverty level income. Of se 250 t�ouseholds, we only have 13 thai: are receiving so:��e form o�'� pubiic sistance. He said this imbalance co�ld be because some people were not aware at some form of federal assistance was available to them. .He said that deral assistance was going to a disproaortibnate ar:�bunt of ,oeop1e with incomes er the poverty level. 250 householdsabcve the federally defined poverty vel are receiving some form of federal assistance. He said this could include d to dependent children and food stamps. Another thing that,was quite _ parent was that some of the households below the 50% federally defined verty level i�come were pa;�ing more than 25% of their income for• housing. is 25% figure was used iar federal fun�ing and by the Metropolitan Council d ihey felt that this was the most that sNould be paid for housing,without �opardizing other needs and 4vants. 4�Jhen you pay more than 25% of ydur income r housing you start cutting down on other essential needs of the hausehold. sa, as far as the incomes below tf�e 50°� ofi the Metropelitan Area•median comes, we estimate that we have approx�mately 1,504 households or 1G:2% of 1 households, having an incor�e below the 50% Metropolitan Area median income ve1. This was a 1975 estimation. There are 9,400 households in Fridley. is covers the social-economic data. Housing Characteristics was the next i�em in this plan. In this plan r sociai-economic data was bnsically taken from the 1970 census. �iVe have terpolated that up to 1975 data ��rhere we could. 7he social-economic dai:a s presented on block group. �Il ofi our housing dai:a was 1975 data ��rhich has en takei� from our assessing files. We have broken ihis down block by block, d this was not by block c��oup. L�e k��ow wh�re our housing units are as• far housing data, whet�eas out� soc�a�-economic data w�s pinpoinied in general a�reas. Under our housing data, we are looking at out pas� devel�pment in housing nd estimating our future developa�ent in housing. H�using develapment will �nt�nue t� �c�row ��hile o��r populai:ion was stabilizing and would possibl�� dro�.. ne of the things that affect t.his :•�as thai; our family sizes were decreasing. herefore you need more housing tQ maintain the same population level. Ne aid that Ci�art #4 shows ou►° housing gro��rth,fro�ri 1975 to 2000 assuming our resent land use. We only l�ave so much res�dential land left as we are about 5% developecl. Wil:hou� ary rezoning or any change in residential land use, e would probably er�ci u�� -a�i:;�� sc�retiz�nc; less th�n the 14,000 hous-ing units i;hai; e show on this cha,�t. ;i;su�n��c� certu��n develop�»ent ��ressures and certain evelopment trtnds, 7i'r,e s,�h�ti��er• auarl;ment monies will break loose because of �� . � � 1� `� _ �� Y� . � '. � �y� ' � , �.. s > -� Pl�nning Commissi_on S►�ecial Public Hearinq t�1�eting - Januar� 2II, i97G Page 3 mo on �l U Th 7h ca� wi st Ar� th $2 an un of at u a s a V a i Z . . `n . . � ,. m ' t W � •.' " � .�� : � . � x � � � � � � e monies available or a lovrer percen*a1e rate far mortages. The dotted line this chari: shoa� �the poi:e:��ia�( oz' housi� g gr�owtf�. Out of a total of 9,�00 sing unii;s, appt~oximat�iy b,131 are single family owner-occupied units. �re are also approximat;ely 2,f3u1 multiple units and close to 406 mobile homes. mean value rancge i�or owner-occuried hon;es was somewhere in the t�ange of ,000 to �25,000. In this ranye w� have 39% of all our housing unil;s. This ,000 �o �25,000 was structura'i value, and does not include iand costs. You assume that the land cos�;s ranye �nywhere from $8,000 to $15,000. Th�s 1 give you some idea of the market value o� homes. In looking at our housing ck, ihe 6reak-off range for loti�r and mo�lerate housing v�ras aroun $20,000. roxin�ately 1,OG0 o��ner-occupied singie fami�y units range in a value of less n$20,000. � high proportion of these are in the �1f3,000, 019,000 to ,000 range. A lower propor�;ion are in the range oi tivhat vre would cali lo�,r m�derate income housiny. 'vJe also have approximately 730 multiple dwelling 'ts currently renting i=or ?ess than $150 ?er month. That 4vas a7so the bre�k- f range of' ?ow and moderate incor��e housirg'for renta� structures. In l�okin� housing char°acteristics and housir.g supp�,y, we have i�our condition levels. ese are new, good, fair and poor. f=a�':r and poor conditions are those ho�a�ir�g its, that need considerable 4�ork as fa�� as ��ainl:enance and st��t�.tural damage. or, the s�ructure v�as still habitable, bu� should be torn down. We have proximately 11 unit� in the con�munity� thai were classified as poor. Under ir'we are talking abou�; cansiderable preferred maintenance or damage to ructure, items be��nning i;o shoG� were damaged window frames and si;ls, -floo�s � t�,� roof may be beginning to sag, and ihere has been considerable N�zar a�c ar on the structure. Un Chart #5; are have approximately 997 iow to modei°ai,e nCr�eccupied units. Gf tf�ese ►�e have approxin�ately 22i units in fair cond��;ion d 11 units in paor condiiion. This m�ans there are ap�:roximately 759 units �cod conditi�n. �`�s -Far as the r�ental s�ructur�, i,�e ��i�ve fcund serr�e error -�hi s. t�fe show 729 1 o�ti� to n-oderate rental uni i;s 5 U�i t}7 no uni ts i r� fai r ncl��ion and no units i�� poor condition. In talking t� the City Rssessor, estimated �:hat about 5% of the rental structures were ir fair cunditian tvith ne �in poor condition. This would�mean that about �0 renta'i units woul� be fi�ir.condition a!�d 679 units in good condition. tde are goir�q tc be doing �re c!�ec(:i nr, i n to thi s, but al � ti,e records are at l�r,oka County s'but t�e- ioug�t Lhe fiaure given to �hem Uy tr�e assessor should i�e preti:y� ?ccL�rate. • �' h�ve- a ma� showing where the highesi percentage a� r�sic�er��i.ia'I s�ruc�ur�es i"fa7 r and pc�or co��di t� on ar�e l oca�ted. Another chai,acteristic of housing ti-fhici� wc have to c�t�relate wi±h th� �aur condi ti ons o�' housi ng, ne►v, �ood, -f�i r and poor was the age o-F tFi� s�ructare. e i��v° n�ups i�; this pl�n she��in;� �;he �ocation of struc�tur�es by age. Most of he,;��s�ry sti�uctures it� t1�e �ity-are Nel�tively_nev; nausino. 6�,0 of oisr ousir:g G��as in the �3 �to 20 years old range. About 20% to ��0% of our hr�lSlllj as in ta 20 to 30 y�a�� r��nge. llge c��aracteristics of housii�g has c•lase ar�°elation i:o fair and poer cor.ci��;ions. The nexi: class�+�icai:�or, of �ousing ,y age ��ras for housing over 3G yeat�s ol�. tJc� are �dlk?l1�j aiiOUt �%Q to 20% in fl 1 S d't'e � . . ' �Anotl�e�� _thi��g we look at when we loc?k at present and �ast c'i�i�acte�°isLics i� housing was �,�hat was happening in i:he core City and arhat �vas hUp�enin3 ;n � olun�bia NeirhLs, and how all of this reiates to Fridle;�. t�ridicy l�as t� locyl: a��fu�ly ai; p�3Si: ildj)pC1�i11cjS and trerids ir� Coliu��b�ia fiei�l�fs and i�'or•t}ii��si linneapoli� in <7ruer La get a�� idc, of t�r��at k�nd c�f tre��ds ��i�? h�� aii'eci;�iny S. �� iliiVC! �cii;E:i� cl �UQ�: tl� CO�Jl1I??G1"rl }ii 1t�tii;S !)U1�� CdY'C'-�!.l��i� al�`.; ilcl�rC? iUilii(i �:l��i: Cal��i��l�ia {I�1t�IltS, abcui: 10 years auo, haJ r��any efi i:he ci�� ra��ca��;'�;:�c thu� fridley was si�o;ti�ir� in so��e o� i�ts ar•�as today: Columb�a tici�h'�s s�,a;;�r+a�i;�r� I��s eveled aff, fih�y ii�1ve st�r�ed tc drop �in {�opulation, f:ize �oE��.�ia�i�r; h:�� ;►u��red � ' , � ' � � � � � � � � � � � �c ing Commission Special_'Public Hearinq Meetin�- January 2�, 1976 Pac�e 4 at somewhat a faster rate than Fridley. This started in Northeast Minneapolis a{�proxima�ely l5 years ago. This characteristic that si;arted in Nor�heast Minneapolis, happened in Columbia Heights, and was now starting to happen in �ridley. Columb�a Heights has taken action through different Fe�ieral programs an t�as turned ti�is around somewhat, beca�ase of preservation programs they ha e gone into. These trenc�s basically follow different planning theor�es . su h as the concentric ring theory, which refers to zonal rings wr�en a certain le el of population was reached, and the housing level reaches a certain poznt, th y are compatible and they move into a r•ing further out. We can see these � pa terns happening in Northeast t�inneapolis and Columbia Heights and see_it st rting to happen in Fridley. Taking a�l �his data and p�.�tting it to�ether, we can see some areas whcre th s v��as iiappening. We ca11 these primary focus areas. We have hasically three ar.as where these condi-l:ions are starting to'affect the housing. The�first ar a was �Jhat was krovrn as the Hyde Par4: Ai°ea. We do have some sp�cial prob?�ms in �his area becausE some of -tf�e residential areas have been zone� t� commercialy ar� was not hei;;g deveioped as commerci��:�l use. There was quite a m��xture of ho sing types i;� this area, such as apa.rtments and single family homes._ There wa � high conc��tration of the elderly�living in this area. We have a iot of h�asing in this area that was in fair condition and there are trer,ds of deter- io ation. The r�nxt primary focus area was the Riverview Hei�hts area. .Th�re ar .special pi�o5lems with this area also because part of ii was i�� the fioed,� pl in..Potentiai devela�m�nt was being curtailed as far as deve.lo�mentc in ��e _ fl od piain area. Another potential area was in the Plymouth area in the sou�hern part �f Fr�i�ley. This v�aas ance a part of Calumbia �{eight� and The housing i,� this area ��ras characte��istic of the hous�ng in Co�umbia �ieigl�ts. �:his I� us�n� stock was bui1t when Columbia Heights was aevelopirg. 0 h t In looking ai the survey and an�lysis in this plan, we have to say vrhat es this mean and what 4vas happening. We can come up s�rith certain im�l.ications � the City continues in �che trend that it was gaing. The City 4�as mat�.�rir�n. r po�u�ation i�Jas growing �Zder. We �ave seen a decrease in cur popu�aticn. tween � io 1� y�ars and an increase in �u�° po�ulation between the ag°s o-F to 65. Prese�itly we are not shotiving an increase in the elderly, 65 ,years ard der. T}�is wa� prcbably due to several reasons. 41e may not be provi�ino enaugh usir�a apportunit�es �o make it possible for elderly residents to remain ;n -�I�e mmunit;y. Another tactor c:ould be accessibility far the elder7y. If ser��;cc� rt�. izot r; ac�ily a��a�1at,le for the elderly, they generally {�ave �o move t� �vhe� e e sertiic�s are. Ne sa�id there ��:re more elderly moving to C�lumb-ia i�eigh'cs um Friu+le, tE�an the,�� rere pldc�-ly mov�ng from �;he core City inta Col�lmh�a igi�ts, because �Colurnbia Heignts has a pre±ty good program as far as fu�-;cii;�g �r the e; eierly. 1ve do see an ou �-•mi �rati on of resi dents over 6� y�ars c i d rom �riclley. Another imp7ica�ifln was thai ihere n�ay be a r��d foi° so:��e k;r=� f an ai d for 1 ow and moderate � ncome p��pl e that s�rere present�ly 1� vi r�g i r; �,idley. 7here were approximately 1,4�8 units in the lo�� and m�derate �ncor,e anges thai: are artually I�abituble uniis. 759 of these units w?re o�ti�net�-occup�e� nd 729 are rer�tal uni';,s. 22G of the o��ner-occupied units are in the ��r�;r��zry ocus ai�eas �hat:ti�ve be�n�reviousie described. At the same tim� tf��re w�r� o�roxir��at�ly 1,504 households wi�h incomes below �he 50% of the Metropolita;� ean ii�c�me. Alti��urh ttie fic�ures close as far as the units available a,id t''.fi^ umber oi� Fous�ho?:is that wLre in need of those types of units, it see!��s �:f��,t . hosc ;�ou�el��':ds 4�er•c not 1�vir�g ii� those units. We do fiave a h�e�h p� rrc„-::?c�� f those Jieo�� e who�� i ncome was be�l ow the 50; metrop�l i tan med�i an fa;��; �� - � rlcon:e evel that were pa,y�ing �nore �han 25% of their income for reiit�.:l aa►�i�:s. i��z:��'c�c�►`�, he t�etr� Cour�cil ��stimat;es of close to 200 to 300 subsidized housing ��r,iL�; are �Y �� , • ' � - � �. ' � . . � � �, ;r - . ' � �� • .� d P1 nnin Commission Special Public Hearin� Meeting- January 2�, i976 Page 5 l D fa th we be ev us th au le po we wi fo ar 7h ne Th es -i m . � ob • po , ' ne . . _A , . wh „ ho � . �4 -¥_ . -di � � . th . th � Th ma __ _� � _ --� - � - ge an � . . . re t ta � � re � na �h ' ' � h n i a rly accurate as to what the commur�it5� could absorb. Another indication o�f s was the information �ve havs received on the number of households that e aci;ually receiving some type of federal aid. There arere only 13 households ot�� the� poveri;y level who were receiving same type of federal aid. It was dent that there were federal programs that were available thai; were not being d by ±hose households. In contras� �n this there are 250 households aaove poverty level who wert gei:ting some forin of federal assistance. This was te a relative difference. Another thing that should be poin�ed out in our implicatio�s in the survey anllysis was that the City populat7on in the i=uture would reach a peak and el off and wiil most likely decrease until it reaches son�e�type of stabilizing nt, where the populai:ion fits the housir�g or the housing fits the population. re were three areas in Fridley that if �;hey'were allowed to cor�tinue as they e going, would continue to deteriorate and affect �ther areas. Y� What we found i�� the survey and a►�alysis has tc be reiated to what the area sing goa�s shouid be. There has to F� a;� imp?em.ntation program, wriich 1 hopeful ly be a v� abl e prograr� that �oul d be fol l o�,�ed, and � i f i t, was �� • lowed would carry out the objective of tiie i�ousing goal. lhere were three as in the implementation plan. The first area was housing preservatior. second area ��as getting inyolved in aid �rogra.ms to help those persons ��vho d Federa7 funding or some type of aid ror loUr and moderate incon�e people. third area was mot�e of a code revision area and policy formulation. The ommzndations that were made in the plan ��rere mad� b�fore the Pianning Commiss�o� a-61 i shed the i:�tal goal area, there�fore the•re vii 1 i be sanie changes i n the lementation section. There was nothinc; �in the plan to implement the fifth eci. � ae whi ch ��as to i nco �^perate "��"o �'f'i ��' ho�as i��g dev�� or�r,}ent frametro�°� ic�es, where �OSS1��P., so as to ful�ill the C�t:y's role as a°�etropo'itGn gl�borhood. No type of implementa�ion for th�s abjective vras in this plan. Si r�ce the hous�i ng stock i i� our comm�ni ty was i n rPl ati ve�ly good candi ti on, t we were talkiny about was a lovr percentage fig�re as to fair and poor sing conditions. ihere7°ore, our priniary e�%ort was for housing preservation. re:were several ways t;o go as far as duvelopiri� �7ous�r�g preservation. One poi pt tivas gett� �ig peopl e i r�vc,l ved �� n � i�Qi r nei gf��hood. The Ci ty sh,ou ± d e�;t so�n� of its e�forts �n definir�� b�hat the neinhborhoods are and stre��gthen ir visual, spatia7 add social cohisiv�ness, a;�a try to develop programs avhere p�ople car, be involl�ed. Another ti�i►�g the City can da w�� iublic iin,�rovement. s woulu include updaf:ing stre�t �ightirg, curt�i��g, a►;a jus� general street nten�nce adds to a co��mun�ty. A neicht�o?°��ood ihat yras star��r�g to deter?orate s_. the feel i ng: tl�at they ar�e bei r�g _� ef � oui t�y il�e Ci i:y. 4dnen the Ci ty shows interest, i t al so bri ngs bac1; the i ntere� � a� �the ��e � c�hborhood 1 evel . Anotl�er o^nu�=.iCati�n ;vas io contir�uE t!;e C{EVC'.��3�,"11C'."�t, c�" the bike�va��-wulk.ti•�ay system increase access�bi lity oe�:ween res?cier�t;f�l +�E�ic�h'�c�r�tooc's. This �articul��;� ommendation shou�d be expandec! to �inc�ude ather means of accessibility and � imi �L i t. to the bi keway-wal k�•ray sysi:em. There �:�as al so a recommenda-ti e►� t-the City be the prime movcr �n dev�lJ�iny a t~Gsource cei�ter on i�ousing nteriance and rehabilitation. This resource ccr,�et� could probaLly be �dled t.hrough the i nforirati on and r�f��r�al sei�vi ce . Thi s t��ou� d provi de the ies, phone numbers aiid c�th�r ' . of i;;fot�rnation far peo�le whc were interest�d rehabi 1 i tati ng or remodel i ng tl7ei r� hom�s . T,ii s�,vas va� u�bl e i nforma�:i on �I�,�t �y prese�tly do n�t l�ave. /'.notrLr t:hinc� tl�at t:t�e City c��ald niake avai �able 'e tvorkshops on home improuer,ie►�ts w��ic'� co��d hc� yi�'en by our building ;pect�rs. This titi�oul� a�low peo��l� �.�� c�me �n �:nc� ur�derstand ;vhat the Ci;:y les �,►ere and wh�t the b�;ilding codcs ti�c�re all aLou�.. Ti�ese �ecommenditions � all important as fat� as �reservat�c?� �, housir;g units. 1�. ' ' � , r � , � ' r ' ' � , � . . lE F'lanninc,� Commission Special Public Hearinq Meetinq -Janu�r_� 2g, 1976 I'age f se Fu th th co wo It th an th ne �,� on su ho sl wi ma in wa co ap do ac th co a in cu co� An if de in ne of Another area the City should be loo{;ing at werE aid programs. There are eral programs that are available. One of.i;l�ese was Communit�� Qevelopmerzt ds, which was a block grant program. Most of the funds that were avaiiable ough the Department of Housing and Urban �Jevelopment (NUD) that were av��ilable ee or four years ago have now been grouped into one block grant. The coinriuni�:y ld use this money a� leverage money for local lending institutions, which ld be the same as the City subsidizing low interest rates on housing loans. � could also be used as direct grants for housing rehabilitation. Another ng these block grants could be used for ��aould be to impr•ove downtown areas, improve accessibility to i:i�ese areas, and oi:her things related to low to erate incoii�e pecple, as well as related to im}�rovements that wcul� improve Cii:y as a whole. Another source of monies available for remodeling and . ghborhood� preservation Hlould be the P•1innesota Housing Finance Agencyr WlliCil e subsidies ot: bank interest rates. TVjis would save the applicant 2 to 3% home improvemen� loaris: Another area af funding that woula be av�ila.ble ld be under Section 8 rent subsidy program. This would be direct rental sidy to persons. Qefore this tim�, a lot of rental subsidizs �ven�; to sislg units. Th� tota' after effect of that t� �?e af progra�n was �. loi: of �m areas, or a concentration �f low ir:�ome ��ousing. There was a loc of problems � h this. Under the new program they v�ere sut�sidizing people and this tAroulc� :e units available ihrouyhou± th2 entire community. People v�ith low to moderate o��ies can find places to live throughout the cammunity with these reni subsidies. �re are severai alterna�;ives for applying for Section 8 funds. One alternative to do this through our own Housing and Redevelopr�ent Authority, �r else �� tract vri th Metro Counci 1 and ��etro Coanc i 1 wvi 11 gi ve use some aa d as to - lication and dispersemcnt of funds. 4�1e could let the Metropolitan Counci�; i� d7 i. 4�e wc�u = d have a contract vri th Metr� Co�jr�ci 1 and 1 et them Go the ou�t��g procedu��es, the application procedu1�es an� t�e scree,ir�. The onl� ng we wou l d cic on �hi s�rou1 d be the i nspect;�i on of thc uni ts , ar we cou i d trnct w��;h Metro Council for m�king application and handling account.�ng cedures. The City Staff would make the nccess�ry c�ient contact, provide ay cut of housin� units available for Section � funds and aisa make the r�ec�ior�s. For code revision and policy formulation, the City snould re=evaluat� their_� rei�� land usage in order to determine it we have ar� adequate balance b�Tc,Jeer mercial-industrial and resid�ntial land use. Ti�is tvas very important. th�r tning that snould be looked at was the present Zoning Codes to deter�r�ine they ��ere a viable means of ensuring human scale in th� City's resident�a� elopm�nts. v�e may �e discriminat�ng in our zoninc� code against lcw and moderate ome housing. Another recommendation was� }ljat the C�iy contin�all�� 100!< for fed�ral, state and local programs the commui�ity could use for ti�e preservatior� housing along with aid programs. Something that could be added to this pian was tv determine the social im act of h�using or� the community. This could be studied as one af the im lementation procedures of �;he plar as ►,�ell as taking a look a�: Metropc�itar� Co nc�l's development framework p�licies on r�eusin5 to see how weli the�e po�licies co 1d b� implement_ed in aur �lan. , , ' � ^9r. Qoardman s�id he would answer any questions anyone had on this plar�. ��1r. Scott said the Human Resources Co,nrniss�ion �� corcerned ;:hGt t:t:e , ci �i zei7s t�e l lll`�CITI°d ef t►�e programs and ��cl i r i es o � �Ill S p� a�i anci i n i:fti ;� re arc� �hey had inv�t:ca Nanc,�� Reeves of tf►e ��i��tro Cou�}cil lious�ng i.iivi�i�i� ta pr�sent some facLs abou�t housing subsic;ies and statis�ics her oi'f�ice ha� � � � � � ., r � � ' ' � ' ' L � � .� � � Plahninr, Com�nission Special Pu►a7ic Hearinc� MeetincLJanuary 28, 1976 Page 7 1 F gat�ered concerning these facts. H� wou?d 17ke to have her called on to explain in ayman's terms, what so��e of� these subsidy programs are and the results her oi'f'ce has achieved from them in th� P�1e�ro area and areas around our community. She will also be availat�]e to answer quesii�ns from the audience. Na th sa an co ge In � ar� su t wa a t a � t f 0 h Mr. Scott said there were many forms of subsidized housing and he asked Reeves to explain the diffei�ent programs. Ms. Reeves said there had been varicus �;ypes of subsidized h�using avai�.able ough the years. P,mong tnenl were 236, 235, 7itie I, Ti�le II, etc. Sh2 id that raiher than talk about r�umbers, �he would just talk about the basic. es of subsidized housing. One type would be where,a building was constr�cted, then fa��ilies or the elderly are able to live in this building. This building ld be owne� by tne City or H�using Authori�y, or under private ownership under t was formally called th� 236 progrum. These are areas where you do have an niifiabie buiid�ing 4vhere people can say this was subsidized housing. In era] ti�ese bu�i icii,�g have been for the eldcrly and have been quite success�Ful. othe� c•ses, it m�gtit be u building for fa.milies; or primarily for famiiies, in,n?any cases these buiidinos have been somewhGt less desirab�e, nct entirely c:essful. Now tnere rras ar�other type of subs�dized housing thai; has no� been r ed before, at least not on the scale thu� it �Has being done now, and that what was currentiy knoa�n as Sec�ion 8. It provides under this program for cattered side approach ior subsidiznd f:ousing, both for the elderly and for i�ies. For fami�i�s i� l�ras the best type of ho�,�siny subsidy that has been � vi deu �,y the �=ed�rai governrnent, i r� tf�a� i t al l ows the fami 1y the opportuni ty � s�lec� a housing unit on its cwn. It doesn't dire�t them to a single ident�fi- � e buiiding. It rrovides �or scati;erec! �ites within a community raiher �;han i aciior� vri thin cer�ain r�e�i�l�barnoods c-+: 1ot�� nc�me peo�le. For �his r�eason, i-is was the pro�ram the t�etro Council ��as operating and as far as they could �� was the most succes�-fi�l program for most communities to use. l�1,. Sco�� asE�ed �!uncy Reev�s a couple o-i ques�;iors on subsidized housing. �sS:eu if Gry�one fr�m So�fiet ftussia or Commuiiist China had made applica�;ion r assist�nce.. his. Reev�s said net in this area. P1r. Scott said then it was fe to assi�me t.ha�: they u�ould all be Americans wh� a�plied fior this assistance. . Scoi,�: said th�t Colurni�ia k'ei�h�s had Se�tion 8 housing and he wondered if . Reeves knew I�o�v r��any app7ications tfie3� haa received. Nancy Reeves said they d jus� finisned a ccmrrehensivc reporL an this and maybe you would t�e interested ho�� thZS pro�ram was going. 5i�e said that over all they had 13 communities �rf:ic�i�at�ng in thc pragram. Overali ther� have bee�� about 7200 people that �ve af�pl i ed for thi s prc�ca;�am, � ncl �sdi ny 76 appl i cants i n Col umbi a Hei ghts and Z'in Coon Ra�ias. �fhese 4vere tiie two con��mu�it�es in Anoka County who 4rere 3Z^ti:.��?at'inq in tf�e pr�grar�. Mr. Scott t�sked i�U�� m�ny of the 76 applican+,;s in �lumbia !-ieights wQre fi�r�ozn the �ir�ner Ci�;y. f�is. Re�ves said that Columbia Heights ad �:i�ree app � i c;zti ons frc,m ti�e cen �e�� C�i ty ur�d L'oon Rapi ds t�ad none . hfir. Scott s�ed hcw mary ��eople fro�71 r�ridley applicd? Ms.-12eeves said the�°e weren't any urren ��y i r, Ca1 umb-i a i�I�1 C�IiLS , but i n �oor, RUpi ds there were ti�ree former Fri dl ey esicie,}ts who i�rere recei��ing subsidized housing. �tr. Scott said then he could ssur�e -i:hai: ail the wino's and derelic#:s anc drug addicts. were not lined up to vao,d a bus on �.s�e ��d A�lr-nue �ridge to co�ne to �ridley to apply for Sectioi� su�s�d�ze�+ I�ioasir.��. Ms. R��eves said tive have �had some appiications From il;e enter Ci�y for ti�e progran�, but as she ��e��tianed before, thcre were already 3 con.:nu.��ities wii;V� �ectio►� £3 suasid�zed housing, and +��ithin a 1'cw months there ill }1t^GL>�1J1)/ ��' 13 more conu;�!an�ii.ies p�r��cic:pati��g ir� the Pt"OCjI"iilll. So far, no om�n!an�t.y has��e�� in�t�actec� ��ri�h cen�er• City r�s�dents. 1n fact the total r�un�ber l� _ Plan in ' , � � , , ' [� � ' � r�,mmttion Saecial Public Heari M�eeting-January 28, 197G Page 8_ 1 � of c nter-City residents who have been able to participate in this program righ now in the suburban areas was about 32. Mr. Scott said the reason he was asking these questions because it had � come up in this community that if i�!e have subsidize� ht�using, all th� derelicts r-Ci� were going �;o come out 1;� Fridley when in fact your f�gfa+SS � from the cente Y indi ate that this ��as not true. What was resultir�g was that Fridley resi e� � wer leaviny Fri�ley to go to the communities tha� tl�ey could afford to live in, E Ms. Reeves said �;his ��ras happenin9 in other con�munities that did not have this pro ram. � Mr. Boardman said that�he had received a bullet�in.from HUD �n the recent � as in which it sl;ated that the 235 program would ��daeXabainbthatnprogramerent ' p , for than in i;he past. He asked Ms. Reeves if sh._ co� P Ms. Re�v�es said that the 235 pro�ram was one she didn't mention because it ��as � not currently in effiect, but it will be�in a Sa �e�'��o ramlforahomemownership� This� in he n2ar future. This was a mortgag..�ss�st n p 9 w�ou d be primar�i iy for moderaie i ncome P�''�p� e� anjhntere�t�subsi dy so'� chabepeop ie , re1 tively high for i;his program. It would b ; bu �ng a home wotald probably pay a 5% in�erest rat.e and a low°r than average ; dovn payment. Mr. Boar�man said this would be similar to the rental subsidy ; pr gram cnly it ��rould be interest subsidy borhousin�Ndevelopers Rel�ewi�llnot th t tf�is generally would be adm7n�stered y � be able to be �sed fe�r housing t{�at tiNas already d°��el�ped, but for new housing th t aras about to be pu� on the market.through primari?y tt�e laNger develo�ers. Mr �oarciman asked it Ms. Reeves off�ce would be�handlin� this program. She sa d r.�, this would be nand?ed through the devel�pe��s. C 0 ' w R �, � . -- i � ' � ' � ' � ��rs. Wahlberg said that Ms. Reeves gave the �'iaure of 76 for t1�e r.un��er ; applicants for Section F3 housing in Colu�nbi� Neights. She gave the fi5ure 3 froi�� the inner-City. How rnany were fram C�olusb�a�y��go�salla�;he�peopl�e . Reeves said she had.two sets oi' figures. `at app � ied, and the oiher set was that o� t}-�ose tl-��t ?pp � ied who Vrere r►�en'cTy �ittinr assistance. �!e only ha��e a 500 un��t progratt� �nd w° canno� si st �v�yos�e who appl i es . Fot, thi s reason .�ae da not �now how ,nany peopl e e�}�o ve ap�lied from Fridley for these programs in Colur;bia Neights and Coon Rapids, only kno�v that three people from Fr�Gley are ni��•l ge�ting assistance in Co�n pids. She said she couldi�`i. ansvaer where all the �eaple were i�rom that applied Columbia Heiyhl;s because r��an,y of �he applications were in the various �rocess cage,. She said that currently there are i7 p. ople 4�rho ar� rece�iving assis±�ancE Ce�1 u��bi a Hei ghts , and of these 17 ,'4 3 are f�°o�� i,ol umb ; a Nei ghts . Thr�e of ��ei�� r�re trom (�1i nneapol i s and St. �au1 Gnd 1 was �fr�m Caon Ra�i ds . The progra�� o�s a�7o�� the�r to move to any of the suburbs that wEre par�ic�pa�ing in this rog�°anj so ti�ey do n;ove around a l�:ttle. Nancy Reeves said theti°e 4rere 5�nerally two age gr•oups that appiied i=o; �his roc�ram. Eitl�er its people wi» t�a��e yroti�n up ir� a con��T�:snity and suddenly are ut on their o��,n and are setting up houscholds and find that they can't afford o live in the community tha� they i�ave grown up in, or its �eon1e who are inaily growii�g old and their i»coi�ie was going down. They maybe can no �onger ftord to live in the co�nmunity that they have iived in all their lives. These re i�i� two pi°imiry grou{�s �v{�o have been app1,Y��9 f��r assistance unc.er th�is �roc�rain. Zi� r�iany cases, it ti�rus the only t�ay �hey couid ;emain in th�i�° ho+�i� canun!�n�ities. • 7�iis wa� e��e oi� }he best advantages of f:he p;�og�•am nlus i;he scatt�red s�tes, �lhic�� cloesi�'t creatc +�ro�len: a►�^as of anY l:ind. � ,� � . , �. r �� ' ' � � . ' , � � . r � ' :. 1 � � �I l I-1 ning Comm�ssian Special Public Hearinq Meetinq -January 28, 1976 Page 9 t�lr. Scoti: sa�d there have been suhs'i�ized nro�rams that have cauc�ed �roblems bu �his Section B program doesn'f; s�em to be that type of program. Was there an evide��ce �hat Sec�ion 8 was causinc� any kind of concentrations that caused pr blems with other programs. h1s. R�evcs said no and especially arith the Me ro pr•ogram NRS �n 13 communities and .��e will be doubling th�5 program so th t r�o community have to carrry a large share of the burden. It wi�l be so sp ead out th�t no� on?y wi11 the people in the program have a choice, it Yri 1 be spread out over so ma.n,y communities that no one community should have an probl em wi th thi s prograrr�. Mr. Qoardman said tha�: Fridley had recently been put into a priority I ho sirg area. How 4vi11 this affect us as to federal funding for this Section 8 rogram? Ms. Reeves said that �rhat thai: means was that Fridley was a first pr Ur;ii;/ cand;dacy by having a good l�vel of services and facilities available. Th s includes s�hoppiny facilities, schoa�s,�churches, and all the other thi��gs th t mUke a community a nice nlace t� live i�. l�le feel that subsidized ho�sing sh u1d be in commun�ties that have convenient locations because people with le s mo��ey ��robably can'i, afford i;o drive as fGr f.or�_.the things that they nned. � 6e ause of this a first priority area vaas encouraged to provide a good share of subsidized housing. She said she didn't know c�hat number had been assigned to F�°ialey, but that was a relative thing that depended on federal �unding. Mr. 8aardman said that una�r the allocation p.lan the number was 248 units. He as ed how they related�to tf�e aliocation plan�as far as to monies �vailab le. Ms. Reeves said she ��asn't su��e just t�vhat materiai Mr. Boardman was talkinq abaut at �:he moment, but tria.t tlie nu��ber 24� tivas reGresEntatiueof the amount.of hoasing s bsid�ie"s-that could be prov-id�u in Fridley over a three year period, primarily � rough SP_Ci.i0T1 8 rent;al su�sidies or in terms of a new construction subsidized h t�s�r,g programs or perha.ps a comb�nationn of t-he two. This would not include o her types �f pra�rams which were nat �nclud�d in this figure. Mr. Eoardman a kecS i f we woul d be guaranteed ti�a�t fi gure i f moni es were avai 1 abl e? Ms . {2 Pves said t�h��efigui°es were all dependent upon �12,000 units worth of housing s bsidies ccming into the P1etropoiit�n area.,during 1g76 to 1978. This would be a out 4,Ju^0 units a year. If thai many do come inta the Metro area, ard ��e a e liopi n� �liai th�y w� 1 i, tl�en ihat wi 11 mean i f Fri dl ey has appl i ed for housi n� i those �umbers, that certainly they should receive it. Mr. Boardman asked �'h�t '�v s. the res��ons�ibility o� i.��e community �if those funds were not availab�eo M. R4eves saic! the nurnber� t48 was arrived at as a percentage figure.of the t ta7 P•letro areas share. Mr°. Boardman said th�is ��umber was set up on the b sis oi� ir the i=unds �•�ere availak�le tl�e». Ms. Reeves said that was correct. h1 . Reeves said that first priority coinr;�u;�ities +iowever, are the most strongly � couraged io ap�ly fot� subs�i�i�ed haus�n�q even in some cases, to apply for in r� than your share. . t OT du as fo of � t�;�. Scott said he had ueen 'oc!:�ng at the 1976 area plan faN pregram_r far ageing under Ti�le III. Th�s plan says a bi�l proposed by the Minnesota si��g Finance llgency would set aside �i50,000 for the development and marketing ne�u housing alter,,atives far older persons, and if this money was appropriated ing ihe next iegislative s�ssion, area agency staff would provide technical istar�ce io those wl�o were �•�orking or, tt�e designs of i;hese housing alternatives older persons. He asked if anyone o►� the stafi of Metro Council had some kind a har��le on this. P�s. Reeves saici she couldn't give a complete answer on this. have a separate nrogrm at tl�e P�etro Cc;�nci1 calied the Ageing Program anc� t �vould he the staff that aras r�ent�orlc�d. !�!e have taken a number of surveys ali:ernate E�ousing for tt�e c�lderly, b�it fihese surveys do not lead to just ans��er, �r i;o one conciusion. 5i�e aras sure that tt�e City could get assistance m�:he Mei;ro Counci7 if thse f�nds becoiT�e available for that use. ��. ' ' ' ' � � �J � ' ' � � � L� � jl � in� Co�rnnission Special_Public Hearing Meeting-January 2B, 1976 Page 10 1I h1r. Bergman asked Nancy fteeves if when any subsidy funds were applied �o property, if that aff�cted thE ►°eal estate taxes? Ms. Reeves said that sa subsidized housing programs ci�d have an effect on tne tax levy, in�fact ev ey subsidized housin� program today, with the exception of Section 8 ex�sting ho sing program, has iiac+ ar ei'fect on the praperty tax levy. Section 8 housing re ains privately awned and remains on the tax rolls at the f��ll raie,�because th property was not publicly owmed in ar�y Nray and the assistance was assista�ce pr vided to the tenant ar�d not to the owner. In the case of Sectian 236 multiple �y A family subsidized housing, the assessment wauld be at 50% of the norn�al ra e. In public housing where the housing was owned by a housing autl�ority th y have what they call a payment �n lieu of taxes, which was based on the re t collected in the building. This generally a�nounts to a much smaller amount th n what ��rould be collected for the normal tax levy.. . fo Ms us as st 3 Cl � �t N1rs. Wah,lberg asked if �he it�onies avaiiab�e for Section 8 housing was used rehabilitation of existi��g housing or was it used for ne4r construction? Reeves said it k�as used for both. She said i�t �vas used in three different s, and she l�ac! discussed �nostiy the use of Section 8 funds fa�° re�;i: subsidies ch had nothing to do with the structure, other �han the fact that a structure d �or t;his subsidy has to be in good condition.and.was inspec�ed annually. er than that, this was not a new construction pro�ram er a rehabilita�ion pg�am, nowever, both of these alternatives are available under a new law. These ve not l�een used successfully ta date, but she understood th�t they would nt�nue to try to use these pt°ograms. Mrs. `�lahlberg said the reason she ha� ked this qu�si:ion was because that earlier in th� pres�ntation_it had been _. ated that ihere tvere 238 ovrner occupied unit� and 5J rental units that were fair and poor condi�ion. If these �vere rehabil�tated, 4�lauld they nieet then the tr�po i i tan Courici 1' s al � ocati �� p i an for someY°�her� b�'�weer� 2U0 to 300 ttr'ts or re a;e ta�king at�out ad�iiional units that the �ity mus�: bring in to meet the tro Counr.i�'s �lan. Mr. Baardman said we arere r�a�E; taitiing about units per se, �;�ere ta� �:i ng a�ou�: subsi di es for persans . P: 1 ot wr��l d depend upon the va� l�e the s�ruciur� after it was rehabili�ai.ed. �!ancy R�eves said th�t the Nletro uncil had a s�parate allocation plan fior'rehabilit�tian. They are two separate ans with separ°ate numbers, etc. The 24� units thai vaere r�esigna�:ed for Fridley s for h�using subsiuies to be provided �;o pec?ple v�ho �,�ere currently rentii�g: using of s�me kind. Additional subsidies for rehabilitation wauid be a m�ietely separa�;e activity with separate goa�s, etc., and would not necessarily subs�dies to th° renter c,r to the homeowi�er i� lower ii�s r�anthly housinn costs. ey �vould improve the housing in the con�manity but they vrou�an't recessar�f ;y ke i ic n�ore affordabl �, T,hat's the basi c di f-Fet°e;�ce . They were both worthy goal s. hSt�. Lan,enfeTd asked P�(s. Reeves if they ha� r�oteci any movement of people ck intQ the center City. Ms. Reeves said the�e was a de�inite economic iiiibaianc� tne center cities. Th� 11101°e wealthy, more af�l�ent r°es�idents tend to le�ive e center ci ti es and ±he �f otver =i ncome peopl e tend to stay, ai�u otl�er 10�� i r;come ople -tend to move in. We have seen some �n��ica�ions that th;s aras beinc� vers�d a liti.le 5it, but it vaas not soi�ething that was h�p�et�i►�g in rapic� ocess. � ' N1r. Sobiech asked if communiiy residents wcre given priority in the screer�ing c�cess for Section �3 subsidizPd housinq? Ms. Reeves said t;he latest warci from D, t•thich provides the funds fcr this Nrogram, was tha'� resiuent {�references s something Lhat they wouid no longer ciCC�';!f: lt3 i:h� ru�les fior operati►7g a ►i;�>>7�� autt�o��i ty. The program t�ae have right now I�as na t"C41cI�IlCy )�referenL�, ie similar proy�,ams that a�ere opera�ing in P�innc�iaoi>> and St. Pai�l had i�o 5s'i clency �referer�ce, ai t;hougl� othir Ci ty �ragraris do. Thi s Sectic�n �i pra�ram ' �' I� � , ' � � � i � ' � � � � ' � ' � l� Pl�nning Commission Special Public Hearing Meei:ing-January 2B, 1976 P�ace 11 do s not, and for that reason we cannot exclude other people from partici�ating 7n the program. This was how Fridley peo�le urere able to make application in ot er cities and why there were three Fridley residents�in the Codn Rapids pi° gram. However, the way we h�ve been operating our program was to divide up the"500 units thai; ale have, giving a share to each community, using a formula Wh ch allocates units on the basis of our allocation plan, plus the supply of re tal unit� available for use under t1��is program, in each of the communities. Th s share ranged from 15 units for Robbinsdalc to 81 in Brooklyn Park. The way pe ple are selected for this program was that those who apply in each separate co unii;y are put in a pool for that community. The lowest income people within ea h of those pools are se1ected up t:o the�quota that has been established for th t particular communit,y.• Iii this way, we do try to.protect the inierests of ea I� communit� that uras par�:icipating in this plan. Mr. Langenfeld said he thought people in the communii:y vrould be interested in knowing ��rhere the funds came from for Sertion 8 subsidized housing. He said he kne��t that it came from the taxpayers, b;at if this money was available, he %Il U�Ii� �f��•: peo�le ir� Fi�idiey should get their share back to impro��e their pr perty. th ih of ti th fr an tn Me di we in we wh to th ap tc �a� ��rc Na di 0 r� �Nar�cy Reeves said that as far as where the money came from, it came from Fe�eral Treasury. The Pietro Council applied to FIUD for these funds and appiication was approved on June 30, 1975. This was fcr a 5 year progrun� providing rent subsidies for 500 hous�ng units at any one given period of e, ever a five year aeriod. The total amount of money�in the contract ior s five,year program was abouic six million dollars. This money does come m the Feoera� Treasury through �he Si:ate office of HI;D. Each state has offi ce a��d eaci� state �as ui i ocated f'unds th'"OU�fi some magi c formul a thai federal government F�as. 7hat money was in turn split about 50% to the ro area anci abo«t 50% �;� the balance of the State. Wiihin the Metro area, feren�t h�using auti��r�ities ti�rcre i.nvit4d to apply and the unii:s al lacated - e' based �n those t�fho iiad successful ap��lications for funding. If you are eres�:e�i in wiio did get fundii�g 7ast �imc ai�ound, approximately 800 units e i�unded. Metro Courcil gct 500 of them on behalf of the 13 communities tlad parti Gi;�atec�, 10t� uni ts went to the Ci ty of St. Paul ; 50 uni ts went Dakata County and thei r ht�usi ng autl;�ri ty, a.nd addi ti onal un'i ts went to Cii;,y of Bloomington, Soutf� Si;. Paul , Manka�;o und St. Cloud. We iniend i;o ly i;o the federal �ov�rnment for addi-ci�nal funds to expand the program and pr�vi de thi s opportuni ty i n rnany mor� suburbs tl�i s.year. Nlr. Langenfe�d sa�r ther i1: would b� cori�ect to say that monies are aiiable an� �;1,�at as taxpayers we r�ad contribui:ed our share to these funci.s and should tal:e the opp�rtunity to get this back in the form of rental si�bsidies. !�c,y Reeves said si�e couldn`t: agree n�ore. D1r. Langenfeld said.that if tive d�' 1; apply fiar ti�ese funds we good 1 r��e out on thi s avai 1 abl e moni es . i�s . eves said �;hat many communities did ��ot have the staff or the expertise edcd to get �I�ese funds, and ait}�augh it v�as noi; fair, this was the way the me was played. For ihis reason, �nany crnnmunities have not had the opportunity g�� ti�ei t� share back. P�1r. �angeizfel d sa ; d that con�muni ti es can be penal i zP� other fi,ndii�g, due tc� a poinC sys�;em, if they do not apply for certain f�!nds. i�cy Reeves sa�d she looked a� :t tf�e other way in that they were rewarded if ey did ap�ly. . P�ir^. ,ii�i"gt;l"ali said t�e �;new t�;s was ar� aw�v��ard question but he asked �ts. ; if to the exte:�t t��af. s�ze kneti�r l�ow the federal system warks, if siiP woui� � P1 nni nc� Commi ssi on �eci a1 Pubi i c Neari•ng Meeti nc�-January 2t3, _1976 Page 12 1� ca e to give any opinion as to ti��hat e>;i;ent a i�ridley applicai:�on for Federal ho sirig ass�star�ce, at the present t�ir��, w�uld have any efifect on either present or future tax requirements? Ms. Reeves said that was a heavy one. Mr. Bergman said if she would like to pass, that woulci be alri�F�t. Ms. Reeves said she re lly di n't feel qualified to answer i;his question. The only thing she could sa was t at ap{�r��riatians were made by Cnr�gress for Section 8 housing pr�ogram at a cert in level of dollars i:o be usecj througn�ut the country. There have � al ays �e n more applications than fundsa.vailable, so there has never been an in tance here funds have been turned back to the Federal government. If you we e conc rned that; by Fridley applying for funds would ir�crease the federal bu get, s e didn'i; think that w�uld happen, but on the other hand, Fridle,y not ap lying or federal fGnds�would not lat�rer thz federal budget �ither, because so eone e se would �et the funds. Mr. Q`rgman said that in tf7e t�letroFolitan Co ncil p ocess did it ►�rork in such a fashion that unsatisfied requests arfect th Metro olitan Council's requests for the follo��ing yea�°. Mr. Qoardman said he was as•ing if the demand for funds affects the hietropalitan Coui�cil's request fo funds fi�om the federai government. Ms. Reeves said this �vas true. Sh� sa�d th rumbe of requests for rent subsidies under the Section II program did �fioa�r th t ther was a need for f:hi s type of ;:��:,oyram i n the �1etro area . � Mr. � Bo� rdman to de�ceri wo ld hav fu ds. B us d evhen pr grams. in ter~�s � bohatt - ca be ob ' ap 1y for , �, . P1rs . ' �artici�a .. t e s an�e a a;ilabl , ;R 'eves s ¥ with 500 . o those ° a d to a � .:p rhaps �� - � f nds to c pa6ili a di �ffer , . t Iking 7 appli w uld be C u�d i�e f r rent a� locate _ k� en run F r �inst S�e said �t mber i � 2 00 re►� p escri� angenfeld said he thaugh� tha�; one of i:he main points that MN. ade in hi� presentat'ion �r�as tP�e fact that our housing could� contiri�e _ rate. Tf �he City of Ft°idlPy dicl iiat apply for these funds then we to keep up our o�m community by perhaps drawing aut cf our own general doing that, th� individual c?tizen would have additional tax dollars the money for federal ��undi ng progr•an�s �,��as a i reac�y set asi de for thESe Nancy Reeves said this was n�L- only tru� in Sectior� 8 f�ousing, bu� f rehabi 7 i ta�� i on clilCi commun�i iy deve; opmerzi; funds that were avai 1 abl e e federal and state level. Tf�e�e ��ere several pools frc�m �•ri�ich r�on?y a i ned and she tt;oag;�t that Fr� �1 ey wcul d�e more t(�an el i gi bl e to any of th�m. Wahlberg said -that f�is. Reeves 'r�ad sui:1 there were 13 ion?munities � � ting in Section � ho��si►�g an�� fi.hey hor�d ,i:a do+,;ble ti�at ��»our�t. At time thc dol)ar �m�un�: ava�iaL�� nd tne number of applications � woul�t remain constant, oi° ar� yoit going to double th�t �also. h1s. ; i d that 4�rou1 d have to he daub� ecl a? so. �2i ;ht now we have i 3 �ortt��t�trt i�1 es � �nits to give out. �hose �3 ca�r�nuni�ies �vere not qoing to lase any � subsid�es. We inter��d to a�d appraxir�ai;ely ��f�at many mof�e ce�rnnunities ply to tf�e federal g�ve�°ment �;or ai least 50� more s��bsidy ur�its, and � e may be abl e ta ��i: mure. in 1�76 G�e 1 CIt.LriQ �.� ap�� y for �ome a�1di ti ona� 4 add sa��e �nzich smaller coi�?munities, C�[llillilCll'tl('S ;�iti,cut siaff or t�ie � y and ti��oul dn' � be a�l e to oue•rate a 1 ar�1� scai e prc�gram. I t wr�u i c� bP � nt type of prograni eriti rely. s=ri dl �y ��:�cu ? d L�e ti�e grouE� echere t:e :�r��i•e � bout ar cariier a��?ic�t��?r,. Mrs. I�ahlt��erc7 said ti�at if thcrc� �•a��r•r� + ants i n Col�umbi a Elei ght.s , t�roul d i t� be rea��;abl e to expec;i: th��t I'ri dl ey ; allocated a�imilar number. �o ti�e have an�� idea of ho��r many ��c�p1e ��le 4 p �ti�ith this type of prog,�am. i�'anc�� Reeves saici tl�at iG peoplc .dici �ipply subsidies in Celur�b?a He7yf�ts, but the nun;b�r o� ur�its t:hat i�ad I�c��n f to Columbia Heights was o^ly auo�t 3'_�. She said th� apPlieations had ing about dou�le as to the riumbe�° of rental subsidy u�iits uv��iia!>i��. nce tt�cre have been aboui: 1,20G ar�plications for thc 500 t�nii;s �ivail.at�le, that ? ooki r:g at F'ri dl cy bei r�g i n a f'� rs� pri ori ty arca ,►�i th a�� arc;e the al location plarl, coun�ea 1•,�i �h ;;he fact: i,hac yc�« h��vr. wci i o�-��r d�i UIl1�S ltl, the C!)Il�!1?Ulll�j�s {'1dCiy 0� �;il�fll 4'.��I�1l: .�.f1C T'CII� �111�11� CUI'1't'il�ly d for thc Seci.ion �3 exist�ny f�aus�i�� Progr4m, �hese factors �ti�oulci � � . �l ' ' �I !J � �� LJ � � � � 1 r � Plahninq Cbmmission r_ial Public Hearin4 Meetir�g-January 2$, 1976 Pa�e 13 1L lea Ms. eves to believe ti�at Fridley would receive a respectable share of the e housing units, if they were participating in this.program. She said she could not ake a comm-itment, but she thou�ht it �,�ould be somewhere in the nei hborhood of 50 units. She said it was all relat�ve ar�d it would depend upo tl�e other co��muni ti es �yho woul d be joi ni ng i:i�i s proyram. a� sa wh� im� po� PU! 2� tn� de 1e se in we 25 as Mr. Scott said he wanted to thank Nancy Reeves for coming i:o this Public� ing on her own time, and he tnoughi; she typified thF spirit of cooperation rson can recei��e when they go to tl�e Metro Counci1. - Chairman Harris said he.had a ccuple of questior�s a�cut the survey. He � that P1r. Qoardman said tf�ere were 250 households�below the poverty level were not receiving any public assistance. Mr. Boardman said �ve had approx- tely 2.7% of our households who vrere belo�� poverty level. Of �hose hA1o��r �rty level (2.7%) we have approximateiy 1�� households receiving son�e form of Yic assistance. Mr. Harr�s asked how rnany households �vho were a5ove the �rty ?evel ti�ere receiving assistance. h1r. Boarc�man said this aras ap�roximatnly househo1ds. f�1r. Leek said poverty ��e�,rels tvere determined ��y the size oi� household. Mr. Leek said this pubiic assistance could include aid to endent children, so the implications that 240 liouseholds were o��er tiie poverty el and receiving some iyae of public assistance might not imply what it med to imply. Mr. Boardman said that ali types ot public assistance was luded and there were seve�al programs that did not relate �o poverty'which e available. He said tne point they were trying �o make 4yas:�hat out of h�usehol ds under the poverty 1 evel , only T3 �rere getti ng some�" �ype of �ukil i c istance. � � Ch�irman F�arris asked ir the 25% fig;�re that �aas �sed for the amount of it� ome thai; shoiald be spent on rent was gross ;ncome or net �income. NaEicy Re ves said it was gross income. � � sei ei� fii fi; hoi to tnE li su av th We [iarbat�a Shea, Uice Chairperson of the Human Resour�ces Commission, said titi�oul d 1 i ke to state the pos i ti on of �hi s Commi ss i on �n ��h� pro!c�sed �prehensive Housing P�lan. "The Fridley Human Resources Commiss�on had rev'�P.!N�(� Co�r�p�ehensive Hous�inc� Plan. ihe general feeling is thai this pian will �ve the needs of the citizens of this con�munity very �ae�l. Tf�e fact t+at our erly popul at;i on has not i ncreased possi b1S� i n�i cate� that i�::�y no� bc ancially feasibie for mar,y of aur citiz�ns to.rer�ain i�ere while living on a ;ee income. The same criteria wauld a;�ply to nea�iy mar•rieds. �he cost cf ising units is oftF�n not wii;hin the reach of many y�ung pecple, causing them go el sewf-�ere . It i s�he respor�s i bi 1 i ty of' the cornniun7 ty as a H�hol e tc hel p se same ci �:i ze �s , s�me of who hel pec! estab i i sh o;�r Ci ty and o�;hers wi��o ��rcul �+ :e �,;o !�el p i►� bui i di ng our f�_ature, to rema�;n here by provi di ng accessi b i e an�' �able housing. The riunia�-� Resources Commissian r�com.;nends �hat renovatior-� of �b�em areas beyin as soon as possible, and fur�her; thai, the City app ly for ii 1 abl e funds i►; order to establ i sh a subsi di �eci ho��s i ng program. �de recommend �� subsidized housing be scattered throucnout the City. The l?u��ian Resources nmiss�cn would like to co►��mend the C�ty Staff for its work on tt�is plan. fee� tr�ai: thi s pl an ii�eets �he goal s and o5jecti ves as o��tl i ne� by the Ilu��an �ource Commission and urge impjementation as soon as possi�ie." '.� ��1rs. Shea asked �v�l�y streets in the problem ai°eas h�d not been ��epaired? f�ir. Sobiech said i:he,y had been repaired under i:he strent repair r�rogr:am, but � whe � they had been ori ginz' 1 v imp�°ovcd they ;a�r� improvr_d t� wha�: w��s known �s ' a s b-standard section wher� c�mparcd to today's stanJar•ds �f concrete curb arid ' � gut es�s tZnd blacktc� surfacing. In the li.yc�e Park area, �ihere �aas a zon�ing pr�ble � .: � , � � 1M nnin� �ommission Special Public Hearing Meeting-January 28, 197b Page 14 an �r�e wo ld like to straighten that probiem out before going in to mak� im roveme ts. We wouldn't ��ant to pui: in curb cuts for driveways for single fa ily re idences and apartments when there was a potential that parcels could be combir�ed into large parcels. This wouldn't fit into the:stree� pattern very we l. In�the other area, this was scheduled for street improvement in 1976. Mrs. Shea asked if there were any houses that should be demolished. Mr. Bo rdman said they had 11 houses that were classified in poor condition, but be ore we say any of them should be demolished, we would have to take a look at each house. Mr. Sobiech said there was a difference between habitable and po r. Just because it was classified as poor in this housing plan did not mean ih t it was not habii;able. Before something can be demolished, it would have 1;o be declared an unsafe structure and declared a public nuisance. Mrs, Wahlberg said the Appeals Commission had discussed this Comprehensive Ho sing Plan in detail at their last meeting. She said that several of the ques�:ions that had been raised at this meeting had been raised at that meeting. . S e thoug��t the corlsensus of opir�ion wa: that the question of the elderly was a th� utmost cor�cern of the Appeals Commission. It was our feeling that as a community we should take some positive action towards senior citizen housing. T is was the area that we see as �;he first goal. The second concern seemed to b the preserva�ion af our existing housing. We were not saying that one had m re priority over the other. We saw the two going hand in hand and we would , 1 ke to see bo�;h programs addressed to, but our main concern was the elderly. M s: Wahlberg asked Mr. Boardman if he was•familiar with the Operation Need P,ogram that took place in Northeast t�linneapolis last year? Mr. Boardman said . h wasn't. Mrs. Wah�berg said this was a program was a community project in w i ch seni or c� ti zen and 1 ow i ncoine housi i�g ��ras i denti f i ed . 1'hese were }�ri vately ` o'�ned housinq units that needed attentian. She said she couldn't remember which � g �up sponsored this, but it vras proba6ly more than one group. They went to ;�'p'inters and pa7nt su�pliers, electr.icians, plumbers, etc., and then they set . a ide at least two G��eek ends, ard got high school stu�lents to participate. They w re tal;en in car lc�ads to a specific house, and for �nstance, this entire house '� w:s painted in ane day. Mrs. k�ahlberg said she ,�ras i:hrowing this idea out as a eommunit�� concept for something that couid be organized within our community. �� M .-L�oat°dman said this-would go along with our concept of getting neighborhoods i volved �r their neighborhood. He said organization like this would fit into � t is concept also. ' � . � Mrs. Wahlberg sa�d iL also botnered tl�e Appeals Commiss�on that when 1;he Plah.talked abo�rt providing 200 to 3GQ units of subsidized housing it gave no i ea wh�re these �ni�s were going to yo and tl�ere was a big difference b�etl��een 200 un�ts and.3U0 units. h�r. �cardman said the,�� ;ere not talking about 200 to OO add�itional unit�. 1��e are �alking about utilizin� 200 tQ 300 either existing nits, or as federal funds become available, whether this was 235 programs or 3G pro�grams, l�e wei°e no1: necessarily talking about additional units. He said he-200 to 300 uni� figure that was used in the �lan was somewhat based on Metro ouncil's allocation figi�re before they came up with the figu.re of 248. The lan was try;ng to lay out a met�.hod of attaining that range. Mrs. Wahlberg said his 24�3 figure was based o�� 4�ahat? hir. Leek said it was based on thc level of ervices ava�lable in a community, the number.or jobs the community can pr•ovide rt reiation to its pap�.rlation, access on a transportation route, the need of amiiics 4�ho could use a rent subsidy, and ij; was also based on the total o�ulai;io�i. The•re �vere u�;3roxim�tely �five facLors which go into Lhe formulation f this allocai:ion.that the Me�ro Council �ases. P,s further clarification, the 00 to 300 unit i'igure �vas based c�n tlic fact that there were five proposed �� P1 nninq Commission Special Public Hearing Meeting - January 2II, 1976 Page i5 _ al ocation plans just prior to the adoption of Section 8 housing. Those figures we e in this range depending upon i:��e nuniber of factors that t�ere used in �he ca culatipns, which was approximately 200 to 300 for the City of Fridley. I Mrs.�Wahlberg said th�t if some of ti�e housing that was rated as fair and po r was rehabilitated avould this go into the 248 figure. if they were rental un ts, for instance. Mr. C3oardman said we were looking at two different things that would be ha pening, maybe at the same time. We were looking at a preservation program in which.vre'can raise the quality of some of our poor anc' fair housing conditions. A�: t{l2 same time, we vrere 1 ooki ng at a subsi di zed progr<Zm .rher;: � t mi ght be ' po sible that some of thQSe units could be utilized in that subsidized program, horever, there were other e�;isting units within the community th«t were presently in good condition that could be used in �;his subsidized rental program alsc. He said that by rehabilitating some of our housing stock, the value could change fr m say $18,000 to $25.,000 and �ush it out of the range of the subsidy program. FSoaever, we do have enougfi o�Lher housing units to fill the need for that program. - . Mr. Leek said that in addition, vrhecher or not a unit can be utilitzed �un er the Section � program depends upon ti��hether it comes up for rental. If. - an of those 200 to 300 units in the City that could be rehabilitated came up fo rental and were in the appropriate range, they could be utilitized, but if they were owner-occupi.e�, then they couldn`�:. Mr. 6oardman said then when ��e were talking about rehabilit�tion or pr servation of housing stock, ��e were talking about other programs. One wa to subsidize the interest rate on home improvements, and another program � wo 1� give direct grants �o people.for this same purpose. R�,� .i .. ' + { , .� . �� . � ' ' � ' . r � Mrs . 4Jal�1 berg as 4;ed i f i n thi s 24�8 f i gure i i= they were tal ki ng about • an new cons�ruction. Mr. Boardman said they were talking about any existing xco sl;ruction, any new construction, o�� any program where we can get subsidies fr m tf�ie federai goverment. Tn this �ase, maybe we were talking about Section 8 un�fs bFCause Section 8 funds were more readily available. Ti�is was an existing re tal pragram. , '' ' Nf.r•. Langenfeld asked ho�-� the C-ity could control that the people who needEd as istance got it, and the people who could probably help themselves did not ', ge this assistance? Mr. Qoardman said this was a problem with any program. He �sa d i;h�re would be certain incor�e li��its before they can make application. � He said that infai�mation would have to be made i�eadily available so that people we e- aware of programs �tna�; they coul�i apply for becaase they had such� a nced. tie sai�_ there sho.ild be an educatior� program so that people really know what th.se programs could cio. He said there would be a screer►ing process before the . � fu ds were allocated. � Chairman Narris asked Mr. Qoardman to read the goal area and the ob'ectives for the record. 'Mr. Qoardman said the goal area for housing was "Provide for and maintain �� in the eo!:ununity, withoui: discrimination, a ciiversity of suitable housing and li ing environmenis for all persons". He then read the five objectives wliich ar as follows: �. ?�ssure safe and healthful condii;ions in all housing and encoura�e �. �,,,, I � ' ' ' ' l0 Plannina Commission Special Public Hearing Meeting - January 'LB, 1976 Page 16 on ado pla pl a sec thr on go bri ' . � � at ' �. He . th ap ' fo wo pl th ' ' ' � ' - ' , , ' c4onsideration of the qualities of privacy, comfort and other � a�ienities. . Mr. oardman said ii: had been the concern of the Appeals Commission ow 'th se objectives were going to be carried out. When this plan was ted, the Cii:y would establish policies or what would be called program s. We will take a look at �;he objective for the community and our program • would be laid out along the lines of what we have in our implementation ion of i;he plan. These program plans would be initi�ted by City Administration ugh the Commissions. Under this first objective, we were currently working' hou�sing mainten.ance code. Tliis housing maintei�ance code will be ready to . ith the adoption of the Comprehensive Housing Plan. 4�e will be able to - g this to the Commission's right after the'adoption of this Plan. . 2. Encourage programs to provide housing at a cost individuals and families can afford without compromising essential needs. Mr. Roardman said �hat some of the program plans tha� we s�rere c�nsidering tP�is time was an application for a Community Development Block Grant funds. said the deadline for this application was March 15, 1976 and�hopefu]ly if s plan was adopted by the Council before that date, we will have our lication in for Community Development Block Grant funds. Another possibility funding would be the Section 8 funds. The applica�;ion for those funds ld probably come up in early �arch. If the City Council had adopted this- n before that time, or gives any indication that they want us__to apply for _ se funds, we are ready to go on that application. � 3. Promote the preserv�tion and upgrading of existing residential housing. Mr. Boardman said a program plan under this objective wouTd be fi�ding . pe ple for a resource center, probably unde�� the information and referral se vice. Another area was something 1ike P1rs. Wahlberg had mentioned earlier, an that was a self-help�informa�:iona1 center. " cor qui �. ('romote a sufficient variety of housing to allow all pe�ple a housing choice. Mr. Boardman said that under this objective we would probably want to sider our p►~esent land use availibili�;ies. This type of program would iake te some tin�e, but it would eventually satisfy object�ve Number 4. 5, Incory�ora�;e Metro-��ide ��ousinq development framework policies, whe�°e possible, so as to fulfil�i the City's role as a Metropo1itan neighbor- hood. Nir. Qoardman said that under tl�is objective we would want to carefully re i ew wl�at the Metr•opol i tan Counci 1's fr��rr�eworl: pol i ci es 1 ay out and wi�ere th se policies fit into our comrnunity, and implement those policies in our im lementation program. Mr. 6oai°dman said the goal state►nent and goal objectives had been es ablished b,� the Planning Conunission. MUTTON by Scott, secand�d b� I:anr,cnfe_id, that thc Planning L'ommission c1 se L-hc Pu1�1ic Nearing on the ��roposc,d C.omprc�l��nsive llousinq Plan. Upc�� a oice voL-e, a11 voting aye, Chairman lf�rri� declared thc Pt�blic fteariny � � 1P Pi nnin Commission SpeciaT Public Hearinq Meetinq - January 2II, 1976 Paqe 17 cI sed at 9:35 P.M. Mr. $oardman said that the staff did anticipate that by the next Planning Co mission rneeting �hat we would have the map changes for this plan, and the Pl n��rould be put in order so that the Planning Commission couid adopt the Plan at their next meeting. ' ; AD 011� Pdl�ENT; MOTION b Wah1 - � . y ber se o g, c nd�d by Bergman that the mee ' � . ting be ad�orned. i U n a voice vote, a1l voti'ny aye, Chazrman Narris declared the Planning Co ission SpeciaZ Public Nearing meetzng of January 28, 1976 adjourned at 9: 0 P.M. �, , � tfully submitted, vet�son, Sec�°etary � 0 I � � � � r ' r � Plannin ission Meeting - August G, 1975 r��.� i 3 side of Lo G, �Znd i�he Nor�h side of Lot 7, 131ock 1, C1ark's Additzon, with �he stipulatio tliat jthe City a.ilow the e»croachment of t12e sma11 part of the garage on F,ot G, 'ntv t12� retair�c�i easement. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, the motion carried un n.imous y. . . 2- 9 � 5. PO�LI HFARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSED PLAT;�P.S. #75-0�, NEf�RIKSEN ADDITION, ' E3Y 1ETF hENit11:SEN: 3eing a replat of parts of Lots 33—a�ci 35, Audi�Lor's Sub- division No. 77, gen�rally located 4Jest of East River f�oaci and South of Logan Park y. � � . � . Mr. if Henriksen �rras pres�nt. • � h90TI by Drigans, second�d by Scott, t_o open the Public Ilearing. Upon a voicc vote, a1I votirzg aJe, Chai.rman riarris d�cl�reci the PuU1ic Hearing apen at 9:07 on .a propose plat, P.S. #75--02, lienrihsen Add.it.i.on, by Leif 13enriksen. �� Mr. 1arE: said this p1u�, under tw�o diffcr�,�t names, had been proc�ssed three di fferent t:mes , pri or te �;h�i s requesi:. Each time i t had been appro��eu by tl�e Pl anni ng , Cammissio a►�d the Council. �'' - Mr. lar� coi�tinued �:hat in 19G4, the the�� o��vner of the proper�:y, 1�1r. Harold � � Lorenz .an the adjacent pr�y�erty cvr�er, h�ra. Hale, presented a plat iNhich was approved but ne��er recoru�d. In 1�'S9, a developei° presented the same plat, �-ihach was appraved ' T�r' but never reco�°ded, and ir� 1970, it vras again t��ought in and ar�provPd, and �for some _�-. r�ason �,ra neve�� recorded agai n. Now since 5 years r�ave passed, ti-re i;o1 d the pe�i i ti oner �^�,` i.hat i1e tv uld ha.��e to st«r�: all over ag��n yoing th��o�.�gh the Public Hearing process. . � �X� r , � � � � � � �- �I •� h1r. la��k s��id thcre �,��ere � lots i,i t�e proposed plat, and they all m�et al' �t.�ie reqi�i emen�s as to total area and front fa�tage. He said tlie same stipulatians 1;hat t��ere necessary at ti�re i;ime of the other rec�uc�sts for this plat still exist. . Rn easert�e �t .n��st bE grani;�d be�t��een Lots 4 and 5 0� i;he pr�posed plat, �;o allot�r �the sewer to e��°ought out io sc�rve the �i.:�r� houses thai face East River Road, and also al1a�r the tva-c�r main to be loo�ed o�;�� :o the ma�in on East River Road, to ens�t�e p� Jper water cir ulation o�� the ��ater syst�m. 6ack �in t��e previo��s ap�rovals, it w�s roteci, and i t Gva - st�i i-1 true y that oth�r ri ght of 4vays are� nc,cessary to get acc:ess to thi s �lat. '�de no��r have on fil�, �� 25 foo{� eas��n�er�� on Lot 31 i=or street r'igf�t ot way, b«t t,re ha,�e n thi ng o►� fi 1 e cn l.o� 34 �o gi ve tt?� other hal f o� i;he aedi cati on , or to pro��ide a°quai:e r�ig�it of way �o bring �he str�,et in from Rivervie�v T�rrace for public access �to a��o �f�er publ �i c str�eet. The COUnCi � h�jd p��ev�i ously authori zr�ci ti�e neyoti ations for these right of t��ys, bu�� until t;� have a plat probably on zile, the City, if it spent any mon�y, wouldr�'t liave a�aroje.r..t i;o ass�ss �it �Loy _and thai was one_.oi' the reasons these ri g�t: of �,rays hadri' �t been acqu � red. , f Mr. lai°1: said that ti�e f�ngine, r•i►�g Departr�eni had 1ool;ed at ichis plat, ana }��s said i;hat i t��ras feasi bl e to serve �i t 4��i tt� sewer and water, provi di ng ihe ri yht of tvays were acquii�ed. He said i;hat James Nedren� ��as preseni, representir�g Riverwood School, and f�e had recalled some of the original conversations, and there was some CI1�P_111i11�3 ack �in previous approvals as �to ��ri��ther the access should go� ou�; to East River Ro d, or out to Rivervie�,� 1'errace, or botl�. � It was the consensus of tfie staff, Planning Comi�iission, Streets & l�tilities, and Council, that thc access should be to Rivervie 7errace, and not yo out tc� East 2iver Road, because this was a blind inter- sect�i on . Ct�a�rman I��rris askeci ii' Luts �! and 5 would l�e large enouyh to handle the se��rer easetn�nt and si:ill be buildabie, h1r. Clark said they v�ere. � ' , ' �� ., Plannin . Mr. C utilities him quite spring, be will be he said it ma ways becau a new Stat Ne said he right of w woul d be t benefit fr where stre with rathe Mr. wondered t�Ir. C1arI; for his p made to s ,service, would be thPre wer Mr. Clark liked to >mmission h1eetinc - Aunust 6, 1975 Pac�e 14 2A ark said the petitioner had Uecn discussing the program as to when the nd streets, e�c., could be put in, anci the Engineer�ng Department told onestly and frankly tl�at i;hey probably wouldn't be put in until next ause there are hearings on the pla�: still necessary, and after that�th�re rings on tl�e improvements and the acquisition of the right of ways. Ne be tvell for the petiticner to try and acquire some of these right of e he could negotiate, because the City vras noi�! put in the position by e iaw where they have to offer what; the land was tivorth by the square fo�t.� didn't think there vrould be too much �:rouble guining som� of these ays because there were houses located on unimproved streets. The excPptio�� he two houses facing Riverview Terrace, becaus� ihey wouid gain very little om the street. He said �;hat Mr. James Eiedren had recal led some ne�� laws et right of v�ays that conflict with i°ecreational�property, had t.o be dealt r del ica�;ely. � ike Hagen, 7170 East River Road, said that�he had no sevrer service.and f ��rhen this p1at was developed, if the sc�wer ��rould be put in for hi�s lot. said to serve the plat, sewer service ��rould not necessarily be put in operty, but if he desired a feas�bili�y study or a pr�liminary re;.ort b� r�ve his property, he would suggesl: that he petition the City for se4ver o it could be done in conjunction with thi� nlat. Nr. C7ark said ther•` hearing held in vrhich Mr. Hagen v�ould be told 'che estimated cost. and if other right of vr�ys necessary, this ti��ould also ccme up at the �earing. told D1r. Hagen that tl7�is ttiould not corne up ��ri:ll�out a petition, and Counc+l ave 50% of the people a�fected by this request, sign.the pei;ition. Mr. "Hag�n said that both Nir. Nielsen, 115 71 1/2 �Jay N.E., and himse1f, who `: � own the tvo t�ouses at th� end of 71 1/2 Way,. war�ted to see the a.ccess to Eas�; Rive►� Road clos d, because ti��is i�ras a b�;ind corner. � � � , � � � Li , � h1r. const'ruc on wi�at they be as to on said the buildii�g buildinc7 tk�e pe1;i thei �� pr Kenneih Johnson, 30 Logan Parkway, said N�e i�va.s in�l:erested in the type of i on ihat ti�oul d be goi ng i i� on thi s pl at . fie r sked i f there v�ere any, 1 imi tati ons au�d be buiit on this piat. l�r. C�ark said �;hc �nly limitatio;�s t��ere �hat ingle family h��nes and of a certain square footage. Ther� were no fimita�ions story, two story, or spl i� fayer, and they m�.<st nave .garages .. y��. C? ark pe�i ti an�r ��as present, ar,d as h� was a home Lu� 1 der, he ��ou'f c� proba�ily be all the homes on this plu`t. Mr. Johnson said therc t�touldn't be any apar�L�ient going in then. I�ir. Clark sa�id ihe nrop�=rty wasn't zonEd �iur apa►°tments and ioner wasn`t askiny for rezoning. h1r. Jofznson saiu he thought the val��e of perty would go up if this was developed in�b a n�ce area. � Mr. Jan�es Hedren , bus�iness administrator for School Districf ��1�, said that he thougl�t t►�ras �remature to be talking about rigVit of �1�ays or possible right of ways. h'ir. Clar said he didn't think it �vas prem�l:ure, but he thought it would be premature for the ity to nego�:iate for right of ways until this plat ��as accnptable.-He saic! that neg tiations woula have to start before i;he final piat was approved. Mr. Hedren said the other problem woulu be drainaye for th�s plat. Mr. Clark sa�d the e t�ould have to be a st;orm drainage plan for this pla�;, and they vaouldn't allow it to drain onto school properiy. t�1r. Gordon SangSter�, 71G9 River��iew ieNrace fJ.F., said he �vould lil:e to review some ofi the things that ha�,�e haE�penea before 1;I�is �r.r,uest. .Fie _said he purchase� his propert in 1964, ai'ter the first p?at had been pi,oposed. He said he applied fo� a b!rildinc� permit ii� June of 1966 and at �:hat 1:ime there was soi�ie discussion abou�: the roa going �iirough and that i:i�ey desired 25 fe�t f'rom his lot for rigl7l; of way. �,lannin e Quring th wani;ed i f issued wi bui i t sou said he b hi s prope suspect t way i:he 1 i t t,ra s s t would be Mr. way be ob i:his san=e either Ea was felt that sinc questione P1r . of the hi planning of using 7his was there wot, difficult 10 homes �mmission P�ectin� - Aunust G, 1975 e 15 2 � t time, it was determ�ned tr�at we could not build the type of home we tl�is 25 feet vras given up, and subsequently the building permit was � hout the right of v�ay being given. At i;hat time there w�ere no homes h of R9verview Terrace, altt�ough tl�e property had been platt�d. He l i eved +.there was 30 �feet bei;ween hi s� oi: 1 i ne and i;he l.ot South of �;y. M�^. Clark said this w�s correct. Mr. 5anyster said that he wouid ai; this vrould not be eno«gh, as i�; was not enough for street right of st time th�re a�as a proposal for a plat in this area. Mr. Clark said� ted`by both�the Planning Commission and Council that a minimum of 40 feet equir�d for the right of way. angster said he would submit that any property necessary for ihe righ�t o� ained from tr�e lot South of his property. He said that in 1969, vrh�n plat was c.onsidered, the plan was that access for this plat could be t River Road or Rivervietiv Terrace, or both. He said East River Road o be undesirable a�; that time, because of.the curve in the road. Ne said that tinze there has been developn�ent aloi�g East River Road, and 'ne if this wouid be a blind corner, if som° brushing back werz do��. Cla�k said he though� P1r. Sangster haci given a pretty accuratz descript�on story of this area. He said he recalled it the same way. He said ��he Commission could ask the CngineEring Department to study the feasi,bi1ity Eas� River Road, but he would doubi; that�they wauld change th�ir mind. because of the curve in the road, and because that sometime in the �=uture, 1 d be a med�i an pl aced i n �he center of the road aahi ch ��rouid make ihi s a access for anyone Gvho ��aant�d to ,o South. He said there N�oul� be 8 or wh�o would have to use -this access. : Cha i��t�an Harf�is asked Mr. Sangsier hew close h�is i�cc�se was �o the pr°oposed road., M:. Sangsi;er said it vras 20 feet. 1�ir. Scott asi«d P�1r. C�ark �if fihey �h�c�uld :.��ke._ 5 eet from each property. Mr. C1 ark sai d tY�er�e was no set rui e, i t vroul d '.depend,,u on the s�treet alignment, but the total would be 10 fee�. � Mr. were coni It��was d to route op.�ositi Council devel;ope to be �de East Riv st�pulat access t b� achie Coun ty f David Harris said that at tne �:ime'�his ��ras considered before, he -�thoug�� ent� from the County asking the City to limit the access to East R�ves� oad. i;erniined at ti�at time that they 4JOUld ,try to �vc,rk out an a�1�e2ab�{e solu�tion the tr�af�ic to Riverview Terr�ce, tr,ying to take into consideration the n to.this solution. He said this c�ncept had already been��apn�o�ded by the t leas� t��ice, and he d?dn't see any other way th�s �roperty c�u1d be in relation i;o ilie lot size and acce:;s to �i�ese lots. He ��i�ouc�ht wha�t had ermined was whe�:her the p�lat traffic flow goes to Rivervieva Terrace or r.Road. He said he thought a il2oti�n should be �r�acle ta approve the plat, ��g that �re Cng�neerinc� Qepartmen� try tcvfin�+ an agreeable way to find Rive.ruiew Terrace, with the secon� op�:ion beiny that if this could not ed, �o report back to the Plani��ing Cor�rnission s�;n;� ii�dicution c�n ho�•� �he els aboi�t access to Fast River Road. � Mr. teif Henril:sen said he was the deveToper of this pti�o�erty and if the acc;ess was gai g to East River Road, he wouldn'� b� interested in this propert.Y• He felt that ha ing access to East River Road would be too dangerous, and he'vlan�:ed no �ari: � of it. I€ thai: was i:he only option, he would sell this propert,y. He said the t�omes he inte ded to build on this plat would be �n the $�50,000 to $u0,000 b�°acke�:. He said he ti�ould 1 i ke to i�ui 1 d two model homes r� ght. away , even �-�� thout sewer and wat;er availati c and �vould agree in writing tha� these hom�s ��JOU"Ici not be sold unti � tf;ey � had bec hooked up to se��rer and 4•,�ater. Ne �sa�d i1e wo«id yrade �:he street and cul-de- . sac up to the City code, and let the City take over in the spriny. � � � • . • � � �_l � � � � Plannin mmission Mcetinc - August 6, 19_75 Pac�e 16 2 C Mr. S ott ask�d Mr. Sangster ho��v he would feel if the City had to ��ake part of his pro�eri:y fbr street right of way. Mr. Sangs��er said �ie would be most ur�happy. Mr. Scott sked h w Mr. Dahlquist, 7161 Riverview Terrace, fe]t abo�ai: thTS. t�lr. Sangster s id tha�t Mr. Dahl.quisl; fel� the samc way. � Mr. Clark said that when ihe area South of Mr. Sangster's property was platted, w� asketJ f r a 30 foot s�reet �{edication. He said that '�o be frank with Mr. Sangs�er an-d the Pl ann i ng Conimi s s i on , i f more ri c�h�; of way was needed ,��re wou 1 d try n�ore strenuously to get it from I�1r. Sangster's property rather than from Mr. Dahlquis�, because 3 fee� had alreac!y been taken froil� Mr. Dahlquist's property, not directly, . bui: indir ctly when the land was platted. iie said it was' not definii:e on how this t�rould go, but it was a strony possibility, which would depend upon the street alignment. Mr. Clarl: said it could even be possible for the City to decide that they could go v�ith a na rower street, and not ask for additional right of ��ay, i� it seem�d ihat there v�as no property avai labl e wi thout cha��gi ng the cl�ar�acter of someone's prope�°��r. Cha; man Narris said as there would probably be only abou�; 14 houses using �his stre t, it might be a strong possibility that �t{»y could get by 4d'ith � rarrow�r street, b cause this had happc�ned in other areas. He said that ir parking :•,�as restricte on both sides of the street, 30 feet might be enough. He said �;he Engineeri g Department shoia�'d consider this possibility also. NSr. lark said he was sure tha� a representative f rom the City v�culd be calling on Mr. Sa gster and Mr. Dah.lquist and �he school board, to see ��rnat could be. ��orl:ed . out. --_._ __ -. 1�lOT ON by Dr.igans, secor.c7ed b� Scott_, to close the Pub.i.a.c I�earii�g. Upon a voice vo�e, a1.1 vo�ing aye, Ch��zirman Harr.zs declared the Publ:ic Heariny c1os�-.d at 9:36 P.19. on ihe p oposed p1at, Y.S. #75-02, Hvnrilcsen AddiUion, by L.eif Ilenriks�n. : � MOT OI� by David Harris, 5G�C0T2CIGQ' �JEj Lindb.Zad, f:hat the Planning Commission reconvnen to Coz�nci] approval of the. proposed plat, P.S. #�75-02, I�enriksen Addition, b� Leif Ienri�sen, beiny a replat of part of Lots 33 and 35, Auditor'.s .Subdi=,rision � 1 h'o. 77, ocated Fdest_ of East River Road and Sout1� o.f Logan Par}�way, si�bjPCt to the Engineer ng Dep�rtment find.i_ng an agrec��bl:e raay ta get access to Riverview Terrac�, t1�e s�c:t on option l�eing to report bacl� .to the PlazinincJ Comniissioi� some ind_ication . from the Count?� on how �hey would vier,� access to Fast River Road. Upon c? V010E.' vote, � a21 voti�g aye, the moiion r.arried unanimousl�. � Mr. Davi� Harris said tf�at the firstoption, of access to Riverview Terrace �vould include �aving a narro4�ter strLet, if this was the on,y way agreeinent could be ob�:ain4d. . Mr. � t��o n�ode i;he P1 an this was � , � � Henri ksei� asked i f the Pl ann i ng Con�mi ss � on woul cf gi ve hi m approval �;o bui l cl homns i>>nnedi ately. Chai rm�n Harri s sai d he c�ul dn't get �that app�°ova�i ft�om ir�g Commission. Th�is was a Cou►�c�il decisio��. ht��. Henri!:s�n asked hovr ?�i�� going to drag out. Ne neecled land to build on rour. . ��ir. Nedron said�the right of way that was needed from school property alone, ��as goii g ta take same time, because this vrould take action by the [3oard. He said �.:he earl7es thi s coul d be aci:e�t on ti�roul c; be thei r September meei:i ng. He sai d he a i so wantcd o point out that if Mr: Flenriksen wanted to have modei homes for v�ewing, i:hat t he Cit does no� p1�w undevelo��ed streets,. so no one woul� be aUle to get in�there ,�� '. plannin ission Meetinn - Au4ust G, 1975 � in 1;he win�ter to see these model homes. I Page 17 2D Mr. C�lark said the Coui�cil would receive these minutes the 18tfi af August, but he cou�ldn't say when t�ey �,toc;ld be se�;ting thE.Public Hearing on the �inal plat. Mr: Henriksen said 'r�e knew he had to pay it, but th� park fee made him a litt1e un.comfortable. P�ir. Clark said the piatting ordinance staf;es that 10% of the land must be d dicated for park purposes, or else the pa;,k fiee was �300 per lot, u�hich in this c se was �2,400. �Mr. HenriKSen said that it seemed to him tl�at every time he turned around he got a bill i'or $2,000. . Chai nan Harris said that these were things that he would have to discuss witn �he City ouncil. 6. 1�ACA IGh REQUEST, SAV #�75-10, 61' R06CRT HINRI�HS: Vacate the 10 �foot drainaq.� anci tility casement that iies on Lots 5 and 6, alock.l, arookvie�r Terrace 2��d A�di ion, the same being �81 ar� 100) Rice �r�ek Terrace fd.E. � Mr. �aber� Hinrichs was presen�t. M�, lark said that A1r. H�inricr�s t�;an�:ed to rnake a clouble car gara�c out of a single�ca garage9 and he was iimited by the space he lias betG�;een his house and the lot 1 ne, and also by a.5 foot easemert that r�fi�s along the East side of his pros�erty. The staf�' advised him ti�,hai he needed ta �an�ple+e his projec�. One bei«g to req��es a vacution cf the easemen� and a pos�itive att�t��de by the Counc�l. The ather tt;i g f�e had t� do ti,�as ��o reques� and have approved, a variance to go wi�i,hin i:hre4 f�e of 1;he l��t 1'ine. H� si;usequently inad� bo�tn requests, The Planr�ing C�i��;s,ior� �ras 'r�eat i�g t!;e vaca�i on reques � at �:I��i s rnee �i ng, and �;he vari ance wi i i go before �he Appeais C mm�ssion on l�ugust 12, 19i5. Mr. Clark said that all the utility co;n��nins had been ontaci:e�, and none of t��cn� have any faci 1 i ti es i n these easements , and have ' all s�a�e that they h�ve no objection io P�r,. Hinrichs ��:a►�t'ing construction duriil,c� ��i�e .� .: tim� tP�a�; it takes t� �o th��ouyh the vacation process. He.said the reason he wa;;i�s to start -head of the vacatian pracess 4�ras because Uy the ti��e t;his �ras r.ompl�t.�, l�7� + will be i �0 7ai;� fal� or w9ntef�. . a`' � , e SY f�r. lar�; saia �(:he siaff recon;rnendation was that f;he easement be vaca�ed, and � �i�e �lar�n�i;:� Co�»;nission al�o recon;cner�d ta LOUi1Cli that t:J�� petitioner be allowed to er�croach 711 tjl ; s eas�m�nt duri ng �i��e time i t t�kcs .to process the vaca�tion requ�st. � Wir. Dav�id i��rris asked h�v� �=ar ti�e house on� Lot 5 was away from the property iine. r1r. C � ar sa� ci i t t�as a(�out 30 teet9 anci 1;here ivas a i��u�e oak ti�ee about hal f vray to the prop rty � i ne. Mr. Harri s Sc�l C� "�;IlGil Lve wo:� 7 d have no� probl em of thi s garage bei rlg too clos to the struci:ure on the ad�acent pr�pe�,ty. Mr. Clark said no, in fact the adjacen�t prc��e�,��y �4vner, ��it�. Hard�r�g, had s�iyned uath ihe vacatio►i and �ar-iance r,equesi:s. �lr. Hinr c�� sa�cl he tried ta t;uy same land from P1r� i'arGing and Mr. Flarding said hc �v�uld ra Iter join �n this reqi.�Fst t;�an se17 an�� f his land. P��r. Ci ar�: sai d he �ras goi ng �to constr;�ct an 11 foot addi ti on to hi s garage ancl hzh�ir�d t at he was gaii�3 to f�ave a storage bu�lding with a deck on top. � � ■ Nir. � ��p�als hot� they �• I � Clark said as this ,�ras a±.��o ��art reqz�est, part of wl�ich had to go i;o the on�mission, he i=el1; that �.hc Planning Commi�s�on could give some direct�ion as fio felt abottt th� variance. . . . ' :::,: .. 6 � r l � �' � , � � x ;,� � � / • � ; ' , "�� * � , �� '.� . ,�� . . , � , .' ' • - � �. � . r � `� ; , � t � ; , . �'U6LTC HEARING ��EETIP�G OF SEPTEMQER 15, 1975 �nsE 5 2 E The City Flanager said if the grading is to go ahead, he would like the�applicant to agree to take care of the drainage and the combination to make this one parcel of property. hlayor t�ee asked if the applicart had any objectioi�s to thes2 stipulations and the Church representative said he had no objections. t40TI0N by Councilman areider i:o close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman _ Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, all voicing aye, t�ayor f4ee declar•ed the motion carried unanimous7y, and the public hearing closed at 9:�7 P.P1. � t4ayor tdee polled the Council to determine if ±here were any objections to the vacation of the easement and all voiced the opinion ihat there would be no objections I., as long as the stipulatiors are agreeable. P4ayor Nee said he assumed that the adminis- . . tration would a71ow �he applicant to go ahead with the grading. � PUI3LIC HEARING ON VACATIOP! REQUEST �P,V 'r,'75-1G, 6Y ROEiERT HItvRICNS� TO VACATE UTILITY NO DRAIPdAGE EASEi4ENT, LOCATLL` AT 931 and 1C0� R10E CREEK TERRACt. N.E.: The °ublic t•lorks Director explained the request �or approval of a vacation of a 10 foot drainaye and utility easement on Lots 5 and 6, [31ock 1, 3rookview Terrace 2nd Addition to allow tfie construction of an addition to the existing ga�°age. He said the applicant will also need a variance to ai'low the construction to be three feet from the lot line ratL•er than five. He �xplaic�ed the petitioi�er �aas present to explain the request. Counrilman areider asked if tt� re was any one present to voice any objections to the vacation or the variance and tt�.:re �,as no response. F1ayor Wee asked if the City would need the easement. The Public Works Director said no anci tliere would be no need for the eascment 'in the fu�.ure, MOTION by Councilman 6reider to c�ose the pablic hearing. Seconded by Councilman Start�rall:. Upon a voice vote, all vei.ing aye, fdayor Nee declared t:he motion curried unanimously and the nub?ic heat•iny closed at 9:51 P.M, Councilman Greider said the peti±-ioi}er had asked ihat he may begin construction prior to the complete process ofi the vacation and asked if the members of the Co�;�cil ��ou�id have any :�bjeci:ior,s. I�ayor Plee �o11e� �che Council and �indicated there 4•�ere no •• objectior�s to i:he app7icant beg�nn�r�g �;o��k at the pieseni: time. i�layor hee said thP Council �-rould consider the firsti readir�n or th�e or�inance ti�e comii;g ti•�eek, Tl�e �ity Manager said he did nct believe it ��roulG be necessary fcr the petii:ioners to attend the meeting. ' PU6LIC HEAlZI�,G G�I FT"�AL FLAT P.S. ;i75-C2, HrP;RIKS�� ADDJTION; f?Y LEIF HENRIKS[M, GEPdFRALLY LGCATEC 4!EST Or EAST RIVER �ItOl�D A�IU SOU71i OF L'OGkN P�12f;1dF�Y: � The Public t4urks Director explained the proposed plat to cons�st of 8 Lots as indicai;ed on Page G-F of the Council agenda. Ne said the Plar,ning Commission had recommended approval of the piai sut�ject to the determination �f access to the area to Riverview Terrace. He expla;n�d i.he propos�d uccess as noted in the agenda and said at the present time it would be� recessary �to oLtain a number of easEments and dlso the installation oF utilii;ies for the proposed plat. He explained the various easeme;�ts needs and a?ternatiives ai�d said th� City heped that the petitioner �•rculd aid in the acquisi�ion of the easements. Th� Public Wcrl:s Director said i:here are some area residents ��ho are not pieased by the proposal of acquisition of the necessary easements. He said he had made an on-site inspection �and tiie house to the south sic!e, 716i is sec back quite a distance and easements could be acquired from-this r�roperty. He also mentioried that the nartherly home is quite close and not much could be ac- quired from this rroperty. Ne u�ded, quite a number of t�ees ��ould have to be removed to allo�.v this access. - � The Public 4lorks Director aiso mentioned tl�at tFere is a drainage problem in the • y area arhich had been brought to �iis atte��tion by a school districi representative, He �said this aspect ti•;ould have to be wor�ked out so that i:here is ro additional water directed to this area. � Maycr Nee asked hrna �•iide a street they �•;ere talking about. The Public l�;orks Director said 36 feet �roadway with hacl: i:o back curb. He mentioned in some areas in the City the roadt�ray has been reduced to 31 fieet. He said the minimum amotm t of easer ment recommended by the Planning Con;missiorr is �0 feet. Ne said the normal requi��ement of the City is 50 feet. I!e said t.hc City ti.ouid like to icquire a m�;nimum of 7U ieet of easement and hopefully more. . _.,,�,�,,„�,, � ! , � • , . � .' . , .� � .� � . .. •• , . ''� ; , � ,, . �u� . ♦ t. t i • � . . P' . :•� ,. r. . ' ' , � :ii?� PUaLIC NEARING h1EETING OF SEPTEMBER 15; 1975 P/:GE 6 Mayor P�ee said if the roadvray is paved, the peaple of the area k�ould get charged for Lhis improvement. The Public l�lorks Director agreed ��ith this statement and said ' this t•rouid be up and down ftiverview Terr�ce. Fiayor Ptee asked if the people in the new r�- plat ��rould be charged and the I'ublic l�lorl:s Director said for ��hat abuts their oVrn houses. �., hiayor Nee asked if the school Distri�t ��ould be charged for the assessments on Lot 1 and •• � _.�: . the llssessor said they ��ouTd be assessed. ..� Mayor Nep asked if the p�at is approved by the Council would it be incumbent on =�j �'=�> the City to supply the access and improvements. The City Manager said this question is j the reason that the Council should talk to the people of the arra. � Councilman Starwa1t asked vrhat is status of the property to the south of the plat ' µand the Public 4lorY,s Director said this �is vacart and oti•rned by the school district. `.� Councilman Star�valt asked how access is abtained by the people on lots 31 and 32 and the Public 4lnrks Director said thei°e is a narroer dirt road fi°om East River Itoad to �� Riverview Terrace. The Public 4larks Direct;�r mertioncd that they would not get in- volved in the improvement of i;his area all t!�e way to East River Road, He said this �.;A. would be a blind intersection with the curve. --. Y••.. . . . . ' .�-.. ..�. ' :� � -. � ,_ � " �,Y - : -,:;�;.:. � ,, . , � _ � . + � _ . -. �`.t . { _ � . Y , - - ,. . ��. $ �. ' � I �� x � :.; . y '.:: �x Idr. Leif Hendricksen addressed tiie Council and noted that i:he two properties nexL to the proposed plat do not have se��er, but i;hey do have water. ile menl:ioned ihis improvement co«ld provide the utilities i:o the lots that do not have sewer. Mr. Henricl:son continued to com�nen� that if the pr�perty �;�ould not be'approved as proposed, he would like ihe Council i:o irdicate ihis. •,ie said if the plat is noi appi�oveu, he 1JpU7Q not pay Lhe taxes on it and they �,�ould not co��tinue plans ta develope tF�e propert��. Fle said he cou7d undersi:and the feelinqs of the people on River View Terrace and if tha property is land locked he would like to knoi,� at the p�°esent time. He mentioned he had planned to build two models. Councilman Fitzpatrick said the basic question is the acquisition of an additional ten feet of rieht �f a�ay. • � Mr. Gordo�� Sar�ster, 7169 Riverv�ek Ter�°ace, addressed the Council and said he resided on the north side of the proposed ric�i��i: o��` Gvay. He said 1ie t•iould 7il:e to make i a correc*?on in the amouni. of easeii�erit available. Fle said the 30 feet of easement ' j on?y goes as f�r as River �ietvTPrrace an� the remainder is lII feet tn the East River- ' Road. Mayor Pdee asked if the baTance of ihe proneri.y is o��rned i�y i;he schooi and t4r. Sangster said yes. Fir. Sangster presented a brief history of his property as indicated in tha minuie� of the Planning Commissio,� meetiny. He meni:ioned he t:hought the ac- quisition of the addit�ional easement and the installation oi the road��ray �vould be vury difficult and said he did not believe the access to East River l:oad ��ould be totally rid�CU1GUS. lin s�id it would not be worse tl�an t1�e otf�+er access tv East f�ive�� Road, He S:il� �{tP. acquisition or construction of the roadway would cause big problems for the • t��o abu�ting property owners. t4ayor Nee asked Mr. Sangster how he ��ould feel about a lesser surf�ce. He said if this is a matter �f assessments, he ��rculd ratfier do without the improvement, but if this is a solution to the development of the a�°ea he ti��ould say this �•:ould be ol;ay. The City P4anager asked Mr. Sangster if a 30 foot road�•:ay �•�ith the acquisi;.ion of temporary construction easement a�ould be suitable, t-tr. Sangster said there are quite a fer� large trees in ihe area :-�hich shade the south side of his hous�. 7he City Manager said ihis is a critica1 point and it had been talked about before. - ihe City t•ianager said they ��ro::lcl ;�ave t.o consider the access, easements and . as�essn�en�s to be levied when the Co��i�c-il discussed this proposed plat, Hc suggested . that perhaps in th�s case, the developer shoulci pay more than his share for a normal �lat and �•1orl; �aith 1:he neighbori�ood f'or the additienal p•rope}°ties. � Mr. E�enedict Novak, 145 7l'�tJay 1�.E. Lot 34, addressed the Council and indicat�d � he would b� i:iiarged quite a bii; for the assessments and questioned �rhat he E•rould get � out af it. The City I�anager questioned if this parcel s•�ould be large enough to be t4ao � building sites. Some discussion follo�•red concerning the niacement of the house and tfie City Fianager said if it fs t��o building sites he w�ould be _assessed for L-wo building sites. 14r. James fleciron, �chool District ;14 addressed the Council and indicated that the Schooi had sc��er and water services to serve their property and they t,ould not ti•�ant to pdy t�ro times foi' that serv;ce. A1r. tledman a]so mentioned there is a drai��age ��a- blem and at one iime the school had to pump the �-rat.rr on to 71st f�venue. He alsa .mentioned th�t the School Goard had di;ct�ssed i:he rasement dedication in th� past and ••• lie did rat E;no�, ho:r thcy �rouid �-cact io CFe question a� i;l�e present Lime since Lhere are now n�w mrmbers on th� board. !ie s�,id he had disc«ssed Lhe qucstion of eminent - domain tvitii the 3oard Attorney and he had indicated that this could not be done and ■ �� ► . � . �. . , � , � _ � \ � I � f ! ; PUBLIC HEARING h1EETIP�G OF SEPTEME3ER 15, 1975 and the School E3oard could say no. PAGE 7 2G Councilman Start•�alt indicated he did not thin{: the City Council could determine . at the ��resent meeting vihether or not the plat srould be approved as propc�sed. He said there are many questions that have to be answered and it ►oould take time to get these items worked out. ti Mr. Don Nielsen, 175 71'-Zlday N.E. said he would be opposed to access to East ; ,_, 'RiverRoad t�ecause of the curve. He said he r�ould like the City to put up a permanent ,. baricade at this end of the road. Mr. Qurt Dahlquist, 7161 River View Terrace, addressed the Council and said most of the points of concern to him had been er,pressed to the Council. He said he ��ould � object to being assessed fer land t•+!iich is going to be of no use to himself. He mentioned i:he installation of the roadway would have a very definite impact on the value of his property and V,ouid involve the rernoval of at least 12 trees. He said he ��uld not agree to selling the easement. , Councilman Fitzpatrick said people ail over the City have paid side yard assessments for roads that they do not feel are of any value to tP�em. Fle said he • understood the point abeut the ass:-smen�s on this property, this had come up 1,000 times. t4ayor Nee asked what the impact �•rould be i�F the City condemned 72 t"eet. htr. Dahlquist expressed re?uctarce to this idea and asked if there was some alternative. Mayor Nee asked if the property t•�ere to be acquired, it would have to be done so by condemnat�on, he t�rould not sell the property and Mr. Dahlquist said yes. Mayor Nee said he thought the property could and should be developed. He said he liked the idea of homes being built there. He said if they were unable to determir,� tha access, there arill 6e no plan for developmcnt. Mayor I4ee said he thouyht that this was beautiful land and that Mr. Henrickson built good homes. Ite said h� would like � to see the current problems resolved, but this ��ill take some work. . � 1 •' _ � Mayor Ir'ee said the quesi:ion is compo«ndecl by the use of public money �•rhich the school district tivould have to pay for the assessn;ents. Ne said I�e agreed r�it1� the corrunents of Councilman Star��alt in that the Council could not be pushed :nte a quick decision. He said he thought i.f they took some time and tried to work aut the problems, it rrould be better. The City t�1anager r�entioned if �here is t,o be discussiun on the acquisition of �he easements and the cost of the improvement, he thougi�t the Council should hold a hearing on the cost ot the util?ties ar.d the roadway. He said some neople are going to object, but if the Council felt the probiems naed tQ be resnlved, there shoulti be a hearing. Councilman Ereider questioned how long it vrould take for approval of the plat with the settle�nent of the v�rio,as problems invalved. He asked if this could possibly allo�-� construction the coming spring. The Public l�lorks Director said he theught this t•�ould be {�ossi��e. f1e added, he thought to starl uefore the cominy ��rinter �vould be unfeasible. The Public ldorks �irectc�,� asked af i:he City should };roceed 4iith the public hearing on ihe improvement in the area. He sai� the acquisition of the easements ti•rould have to follo� a pub'lic hearinn on the improvement. He said other�•iise, the Ciiy tivould not be able to condeinn the needed easem?nis. Councilman [3reider said he 1:houyht the ^dministration could have some proposa? prepared by the next hearing meeting. Th� Puhlic !�Jnrks Director said the Public l;earing tyould have to be in Novemt�er clue Lo the fact that i:here is no Public Hearing meeting in October scheduled. The Cii;y Attorney said he thought Councilman Greider was taTl;inc� a less formal presentation. Courcilman fsreider suqgested that the matter be handled similar to the problcm on Qenjamin >treet �•�i+.:h some tent�itive costs a�ic� ' aliernate proposals. The Public t�lorl:s Director explaine;l that in the 6enjamin case, the.City did have an iirprovement project. 7he City /lttorney said this is basically a question of the amount of right of tvay that t�rould have to i�e acc�uired, and the City's authorit,y to ac�u�rre such easements. lie said the adverse effect to ihe t�ao homes that thP road t•�ould have to go between will also have to ve considered. Ile said if the Administration can come back �,rith a report � - 1 �/ � .� � , ' � � � , ' , ' � `�' � ,� \ � 9 � � 2H PURLIC fIEARIPdG t4EETIPIG OF SEPTEt48Eft 15, 1975 PAG� 8 to the City Council, it could be det�rmined if it is worth ordering Lhe report on the pi�oject, etc. Counci]man QreEder asked if this could be prepared hy the first meeting of the coming month and �he �ubiic Works Director said yes, he believed the people could be contacted before this time. The City t•tanager said the probiem is in the right of way and no one is going to give it to the C�ty. He mentioned that he iiad appeared before the school board on this question in the past and at thzt time they were agreeable. He said they would have to go back to the sc"ool Loard and present the proposal to the new members. H^ said so�ie solution aiould have to be obtained with the private owners.`Ile said this would be a question of tvhether or not the City Council is �•�illing to exercise the power of acquisitior �nd it would be be�t to talk to the people. He stated the pro- blem here is the right of a�ay. The City Attorne,y said there is a question of whether or not the City can condemn the already public school pi�operty. tie also mentioned that i:he impact of the adjoining propel-ty owners rr�uld h�ve to be �onsidered. t4r. Sangster said he believed i;he area ��;ould eventually be developed, but to ta{:e :more propert;y from either of the two lots rrould not be right. Ne listed s�me o� thz problems that had been m�ntioned previously through i:he discussion. Ne said the siz2 of the road ard the grade proposed vrould be a major concern to him. Ne asked if it vrould be possible �o see seme kind of engineering sketch before making a decision on the outcor,.e. 7he City t4anager a,1;ed if the property ovrncrs would agree to a 40 foot road right of «ay. Mr. Sangster asked if 25 feet �,�ould be sufficient. The City Attorney explained that tne normal road�,�ay would be q��ite a hit wider in the dimensions of the easement because of the area neede� for sno4�� sturage in plo��;ing the streets. He said ihe snow is usually plo�h�ed to the right of vray belonging to the City rathei° than piled on private property. Ne asl:ed if the property owners u�rould object to the sno�a beiny plowed into t their private property rather than obtaining the additional easement. ��r. D�hlquist 1 said he did not kno;-;. i�1r. �ah7yuist said the snow is being stored on the private prop�r;:y at the pr•ese;tt time. The Pub7 ;c l•!or!<s D7•rector said ti�e administration could contact the property o��tners and inaicate hci•� this pro��osal ivould affect them. Mayor Nee said he thought the road could be narro�•rer. Mr. Sanc�ster said {�e would like to see the road��ay sealed at East RiverRoad if it is to be improved on the River Vie« Terrace side. Mrs. Dahlcuist mentio;�ed that the staff should keep in mind that the existing dirt �ai:hway is used ext2nsirely by school children. i�107I0N by Cc�uncil��oman Ku;;owski to close the pub7ic hearing. Seconded by Council•• man Starti�ralt. Upon a voic.e vote, I�tayor fdee declared the motion carried unanimously, e�ne� ihe public hraring cicsee at 10:21 P.hL PU6i_Tf F!E/!RTT;G p"; ; INP,L P,SSESSF•1E�vT ROLL fOR 1975 P;FITER APdD SEt�IER P•1AINS, LATER/�LS, AN� S[RVIC[ CO�vi,'FC�tIOidS: � ' - the Finance Direr.'tor explained that this charge s•ras for se�-�er lines and water lines tha� f�ad noi: been pruvided for in the assessment of the oriuiral projects. He said in determii;ing the amounC of the assessments, the current cost is coir,pared to the cos± of il�e project i�i that g�neral area plus the inierest from that tinie and the people are j given the benefit of the loti•�er of tf�e tt�;o figures. � I•Sayor i�ee as{:ed if there was any questions concerning the connections and there wa� no response. bt�J;IO�r' by Cauncil�r�;n 3reider to close the public hearin9. Seconded by Co�mcilman �itzpatricl;. Upon a aoir..e vate, all voting aye, t4ayor Nee declared the motion carricd unar�imeusty and Lhe �;ublic hearing closed at 10:2�} P.I1. .*,�a,..�,� �; - . � 'I',' � PUi341 C 1 CAIt1 NG t•if CT 1�;G QI' l�0�'l"I•taei� 10 �] 975 .. .. . � , . PAGE 1G : . . � ' sug9est to Council that they.considcr thc tcstimnncy of the juveniles and the adult here be oi•e us Lh�is eveninr�, the re��c�rts of tfie Police 01'ficers and l.ai:e into cotisider�tion the recom;aenuation madc t,y Lhe Public Safety Dircctor. ' _.� ' � � � �, . � T '"k A visito ��skccl i.i' the 0�•�ncr of thc Frenticr C]ub tvas putting forth any effort for his stablishment to i�cco.ne c+ restaurant. � 1•tayor t�e said he did not lu�oti,r of any ef•fort, in that direction. � 7he visi or stat:ed t:h<it accardin9 to the Oi-dinancc, he aroul d have to have a � resCaura �t in order to ut,tain a liquoi, 1 icense, and asl;ed Council ►•rhy tl�ey -- ' were eve considrrin� ihe license. . Councilrntn Greider said i�e could r�spond ta this. He er,nlained that in this'case the appl cai�t �•ras �i;4:inq te h�ve a l;cense reserved in his name until all of tliose part.icu?ar requ�ii-ements t•:e��e met, for er.�unnle, z��nin9, kitcfien iriproveme��ts,� etc. , be ore the 1 ice�;se i•ri 11 actua i ly be .i.ssued to hi�n. �ut at this point and tirm, he is as ing for a reservaiion of a liquor,license. Tlte C?�y Atto�°ney said thai: ±iie licensc, i� it t•�ere t:o be yrat;ted, 1•rould be. subject c.::•I. th. m�tters or requireri�i:ts af the Oruinance. • MOT]OP{ v�is iruue by Councilia�ir. >tar�:�a1t to close the Publ ,c f�earinq. Seconde8 � ' ' b�� Counciln� ,,;z�;a.i,;c., i on a voice vote, all voting aye, hiayor P;ee declared the mo '� carried uhanin,ously, and �he Public Hearing closed at 10:15 P.1�1. FR(1POSE I�(�R1_ I:SEN PI_PiT: • , . . : . . . . ; .. tdayor Hee requested to yo back to the 1'ublic Hearing on.ihe Proposed Henriksen . ('�ai. - 1'l�e Publi l�;or�;s Directoi• descr;ber' this n�x� stre�t as beir,g ;1�Z.!.!ay - fivervies•�.� lei�race t ihe East (Propos�d l�em�il:ser, Plat). He explai�i�e"<I .that at this tin,e; �•,e : have a p•: li ,,n�n�y est:raai.e ar�d liave re��ie�,•red t!ie area, ti�e cost �ein� in th� �-. . OYC��!' O1 I�:.i'�i Ji�r• foo�. TiiiS 1(1C�U(iP.S $'iCl'ill $C't',:t?)' COI1Si:1'UC{:1011 t;(77ethe�• �•rith iTpro:�eiue ts in order to� try and e; ;;:�inate the irnpact and provid� access to � � '�:ivcrvie.� 7 _, � • �� t ace. }ie furiner expla-ir��d th.:�t ��i+fi the storm sei•;ei- ;ncoi°��orated .� ,into' �he lan :•;e can minin;i_e ihe i��:pa�t and .no;: have quite the cut o�� an�� cu�� . tEirou�h t!e aL�ittin9 �r�pertics that pr��scnily er,is� adjacent i:o hiver��ie�v T`rr�ice: �� 1�",� r�il'. f llc:•; itie existir ; cor,tcur of ti�e Lcrraine ?n i:he areaa and �he basir_ ��iclih of t�ie stre�L �•:o�xld�be 7� fee� bacl io bac{;. Thet-e t•�ou1d be ccrci,e±e cur6s ai3d guL�er, (�-iti;r,i��ous ;:�at. ;f�� cosi: is higlier than the o�if�er si:reets basic�il,;� lircause �of i:iic� requesi: nf the s�orm ��•�er considerai:ion. '::� . , . . P•iayor Ptee� sl:ed i{ the stonn sei•:ei, �•r�; considered in tl�c �i�.25, anrf ihe Publ�ic 1•;orf;s [iirc ior said y�;, ,.►,�;i Lhis storm se�•:er is a r�sult to Lh� fact tiiai: r.�e . tGy to ron truct thc stre��:s ai: t11e g;,ac��s that p;�esenily exist. , ' :•ir. ,��0�'�+1;> 145 - 71'; tdat�, t.ot 34, said tiilt ot the cst:im,-ited casts fle cuu?d n�! � affor�i ihi . The i:oiai ao:our�f. rc��aca to ;iP4�i�>.in,��el �-� , , This is ba ed �,�� $G £3�'S. � on tnree lo��, �rL•iciihe �y t�,G00 fo�^^�fie si:rez°t �;�one: '' �� '` oi�icnd_ he do�> >zot fiave. .�c said JliSt� ipl' ii XC'S 811�f BSSCSSI!:C't11.S � i f Ld:;t S t{0 IlOi �U U}) dll,Y IIIOt'E2� d�61li; ; J��. �C if he t•rui,l net:s�17 the.lot. _ -- ��lt�.l'C IJilti CO11Sllittl'i1i1�(? O15C1��S1C'1 f)t f'„ 1? i{}�, P.I1G i�l'S. �'rOVli; i1i1Ci l)iC C7YY I1S$��SGI^ , �.. d�l(i ittP �Odll(1�, U�'i�tdltilil(� 10 1�1C uoss�f,lc (I1��1 T�)f� 0:` i�1� �C�t.S hcl:� I�t�11C�i F/lj' j;fl�y coiild i�c,c „iid tlie t�ia1 squcu�� foota;;e. 1•ti�5. ,da��E: said she hau another c;t�eslioi2 at�d �sked if thc:y �•rould Gr chirged �,gai�i for �±oi-�u sc�•;crs. 7he !'u.,lic •1o�-I:s Direc:toi� e:;pl�ined ti�ai in the pro�,osal ��re are going Lo supp]�� «tilities �� d'slo�•r,� se�•.c��• outlet �ur this arew. . , • ,' , 11�•. Sn�alliYo d. 7�:0 Easi� Rivc:�� ftoad asked whn arauld be payin;� for Sectiorz 30, as � ; 't is schooZ ��ro��rty. , . . . � t�ia1'o�• �ce�ex��l;�irr•;i U:�it. ii. is ;,rnse,�ii;� �,i-�,��oscd to bi; ._.� . � . .�: ,t1�'.•Jiiu lEc�ci�•��i i:�ou?d prob,il�ly likc to corsucs�t on ►,�hetiica•lif.��is usablc'�iolliii�r,�,, �. �� r . , �. . • ' '� � •i . • • . t . . , � , • , • ' ; . . � /`y ...�.4,�Y � � , ' t z � '�� . � � � ' . . '� I � � � , � � � . i i ( , � E., . ]C Hf:ARlNG PiLET1NG OF ?�OVE�4[:ER 10. 1975� .' • �fii ( � 2J i'l1GE 17 F Mr. Nedron said his feeii.i�qs �rere that l:he school board ►��ould anree t��ith htr. Hc ri}:sei�. He said his first questior� �•iould be does the �l£s.CO include storm se er. . � Th Pul�lic 4:orks Director said tlie �,1�3.00 includes stoi�m sewer that will be in talied ir2 the street �tself to foll,ot•� the te�raine to allow the water to en er into the existing storm sewer. • F1r� Iledron said they have already paid the stoi-m sewer assessments. 7h Public 4!orl:s Director explained that in this case he did not believe the sc o01 �•,ould he benefi�.:ing from tr;e storm sevrer that rwch, The majority of pe pl e benef i ti ng fl�um the s torri � e�•iei• eri 11 be payi ng far , i t. The sLorm sewer ih t�•rili be constructed and ��ili be ?nstalled approximately at this location wru ld provide out-fail for the �•rater fl,om the area. . 1+{►•� Iledren asked ti•rhat �•�as tf�e rat?onale for char�ing the�front foot for the ' st rr,� scwer construction. l Th Public lti':rl:s Director explained thai; if �her•� t•�as not a street improvement th xe ►•rould :ot be a r.eed for a sto��m se��:e� ar.d a�proximately $3.00 per lineal � fo t could be subtracted from the $18.;5 if the storr,� sev�er costs v�ere included i ihat stree': improvement. • t4 . Fledron also commented on the cul de sac. He �•�as under Lhe impression at the �� st reeLina tha± there ��;ould be a si:reet almost.to East R-iver Road. He said now . i appears that the cul d� sac �rould bc at the side of the back stop at the play- • g ound. . � T e 3%ub; i c l•1csrV.s Di rector said they �,�ere tryi ng to serve the easterly property t at needs �n outiet from this area. It �vas felt that this pro�erty o�:ner on i�t 32 had i:he poi:eni:ial of develo;;ing I�is property cr splittinc! this property ,- .. - . a t•;IilCil timF: he ;'JOUJJ ar.cess one 1•,ay out East Rit�er Roe.!'. `��' t�i . Nedron said 'ne troaic? like to remind tl�e Cuuncil tha'� the Board of Education d d tr.;��•ess a sp•irit of coope•ration, but in vie1�r of �•rf;at he se�: , he +.:hinks they sv 11 1'eel that t�iis spirit is in jeapordy. Tt woul� �iave to t�e up to the E3oard o f�d:,cation to ��iake the decision. ' -.,.� , >r�cion �unyster corimei�tcd that Lot 3, �iocl: 1, and ih� 1ot immediately to the au�:;�, P�1r. Gahlquisi.'s and h'r. P+ovak'S �f'0�?C'1"�;y, and I am sure t:�e school property, =re i��cluJed in the ;i:orm se��er ass�s�ment a�-e��r ycars• �qo that provided �he itfia?1 io the rivei, frc�r, L-he area yuu �ndicated 'it: is going to. You say that �e r•aiionale for Li�is ��a.s, if tl�e strr>et v�er� cut do�•;r. so that tlie �fater could zr�naily clrain, tne�-e idoi�ld noi. b� a nLed �or this, cJnsequentif, there tJOUId not � an assessment Ugainsti Lhis properiy. i tliought or�e of the reasons why we were jf:is�c� the reaJ that ir,ry r�as because there �vnuld h�� a public safety problem to ��e iw �a tf:e R;��er R•�ad. Th^rcfore, r?ubl�c safety en one hand dictated going to i+rei�vielv Terrace for �afe�_y reasons, theri put in u.reta:ning v:all a�hich I think is �ually a s„fety protalem. FI° s�+ic± I�e q�,estions irh°ti-��r any of i.hese properties hat nave already �?airJ for Lhe star°m ses�;er asse�s:nents shoulcl take it because of .�E�lic policy tl�ai provides a r�ad c�r� grade, i�rh�icn 3 feel is a safety hazard nqcs��dle5s of hot;� ��ou iock at it. . r. ;;a,�q•;i:e�� cor.tinuec; io sa,y, seccndif, as i'ar r3s access �o East 2iver Road her� is a r��.�ch che�pe�- ti�rati� of h�nd�i�zg this p�•onerty, �rhich �vas suggested five ear� ano, to run i:l�e road to E�r.t River Road ��ith iotal ��cccss to the area. It ��ul;? i�e snui off.at Lot 34 and ;ti?; �,ro��icl� nec��ss��ry vel�icle access to the chool. I� side�•ralk cni�ld be run doarn t:h� a�iddlc of tf.�t easement: in such a manner l�at: if. cauld :�-ain that arca on qrac!a arui co��id be done so *_hat you rtould not �vr to put in a retaining ti•�aii. Ne said i� couid i;e :�eli i:erraced Co the.back nd ��t•c�vide goo:i drainage and .cou?c{ c�l4minate Lhe stc�rm se�•rer thi•ough the area. 0 � ;i a� � �� . �� ' " ' . . l f; 2 � � . ; 1 �. 0 ' • ' ' � _, . • � }. ' � � .. ;� � . � �: iC IICARING ME[TING Of.PaOVEMaER i0, 1975 s PAGE l £3 . , � ' M. Sangster�said as a prop�rty o�•rner nn Rivervieti•r 7errace, one of the advantag:es w might have by putCing the road thc way you indicated is that f2iver Road titi�ould U shut off. Ifi Lhat �•�ere lefit open, 1 could ��isualize r�iany cars casually coming o f Lhe ltiver Road d��inn or�e o�` tti•�o things. Coriing bacl; over schoo) property o just opening iC up and coming strai�ht through. I think if you are �oing to p t a iroad out to Rivcrvierr Terrace, it should be seaicd �n the River Road side, o sealed in some manner from Lot 34 so Lhat vehicles could not come do�•rn the s derralk. Ne'said he fcels there are oLher alternatives we have not fully e plored. , Tf e Pub?ic ldorks Direci;or responded that t•?r. Sanqster is rinht that ��re cannot tie d rectly int� East River f�oad, so �•re 4•rculd still i�ave to have either thc or�-yrade d ainaye to the west, or the installation of i;he storm sea�er system.. lio��e��er, he 5 id, i��e are��e instructed to pr��ceed �•�ith the improvement to �ast River ftoad based o the fact that the County objects Lo any additio,�al iniersections oi;to East River R ad. 4!e l�ave a signal no�v at 71sL s•rhich �•�e feel is adequate in this area. T e Public I�;orl;s Directo�� said th,� other cor�unent ••ga��ding the storm setiver down i:lrough these properi;ies, Lhe propert,y ormers have �een cantacted and at Chis point h ve no obiection to the storm se��rer ccn:ing doern througt} their property. It is t ue tve �•rould be on the school pi�opert:y here and at this point, in order to prepare t e preliminary estimate, t�re went throu9h the normal routine of preparing costs ri th the idea that final costs �•�ould have to be agreed to and arranged for. C unci.lman [3reider said he still finds it hard to envision assessing one property otner �15,000, that is unreal. • T e C3ty t•tanager said t�at is the nor�ma1 assessment. �aci� lot is payiny �5,000 p r 9ot. C uncilntarr E�reider said this is true, !�ut he is really ;ay�nn. ;1; is espc:c?ailv h r-d for this r�enilemen. ftn is not read_v to c(�op up his loi ii;tc, ? lots, and � sess $15,000. tdost of these peop]e could ��ot last as long as it takes a t x forfeit. � T e Cit��t9arag�r stated he r�ea?izes it is a difficuli piece of property. It is n t a'narmal situation, lf it i•�ere chuice property at the begir;niny, ti�;e ;�;ould n t have this problem. The City has Cried to improve.this piropet�ty ihree times. h�one s��ys it is an easy prope,�ty to develop. Iv'e are�just: trying to give you s me ff.gut-cs. �do one is saying �•re sijoulc deve3op the property. W� are bringii�g i tfte •facts that si�al•r �ve ay-e tryi n9 to qet by at a mi r;imu„i cost. As far as the d a-inage -is concerned, b_y providing a pi��e syst,em it substantially reduces the n cessity of regradiny this ;iroperty foilc��ing the existir�g i:ei�raii�e, is the m ximunt��mounC of saving of costs in gr�ading. 7��ere is_ no question it is a diffic�i7� piece of proper,ty to develop. � • C uncilman i3reid�r asked �;hat other alteri;ati��es do ►�re have. �'• Tfe City Maiiager� expla�incd tt��it the p�oblen; is not ihe ��oad, 9i is tiie drainage. Tl e sehocl property has 4��tei� �:hicl; co.i�es of{ tl�is unde��eloped E,e�ope�°ty onto L eir prope��ty. Once you allo�;� the de��e�oi�ei� to put up ho�ncs, ±hen tl�e drainage wi1) deci�ease. Such tlllllgs v,e attr_n,p�ed 1i{:e sinking i�oies, out. u��ce you develop p o;�ert.� You h��ve to Lake care ui tii,e d;�ainage. . Ft . Nenriksen asked how much that piece of land is goinrl to cos: fiim, te add it u and teTl h:m ?n one lurip swn. T e City 1lssessor.said it woulcf cost Y41,000 f�r eic�l�t lots. �� . llenriksen said it would never bc f'easible. � T c City htananer explained that this :s a normal assessment. Ever��ued;� is ('�Yi��! for wati�r sanit�,ry �t�;rer, sLor•n� se�vc�r and street i>et�;�cen 5�,000 to , 5.,�00 per loC in r�ny �;lat. 'c1e rrill I,e i.l�e first to ad�nit ±hat it is a difficult . P°P��'ty and that. is rrhy ihe casts a� e i�igh. .. � m r �� 0 2K £� I � . ' ,a a � l., � Put;uc nr.niz��c i•t�r.Tli�c oF i�,oV��ta[R lo, 1�75 : . . � � �. • � rnGC � 9 2L t•1r.' Henril;sen asked hu�•r t.hey are going to pay taxe. on a difficult piece of pro�;c�rty. 1 belie��e, he said, 1haC it is foolisPi ior ihe City, You cauld comc un ►•rith a bettei� pltu�� than that. Iie furth��r coa;mented Lhat he could �3;{L it in �40,UU0 cl:e�iper, th��t he I��as donc tno��e reseai�ch tiian the Cyty. Councilman Si��n•!i,t a�{:ed i��r. 11em•il:sen if he has donr_ more research ihan the Ci1Y, �•rhy did I�e �;�;rcl�,ise Lhe property in ti�e first plt:ce.. •. 1•ir. 11^nri{sen said it rras becuuse !�e �ot a ryood huy on it. Ne coulci turn aruund and sell it no�.� and mal:c a sinall amount c�f ��ro`ii c�i� it.. II� added that the cost pf the lots are too hi�h, ancl that re yc�ung coupie could ��ffor•d ti�em an�l t.he people ��rho could are not� intcrested in Lhose lots. COUIIf.l�li'.;�Il Si:arr;ali: st�iled Lhat if (•1r. Uem•iksen has a better plan, t��l�y does'nt he st�bniiti a better plan. • I•1a1�or Ilec asl;cd 6;r. Hen��i{sen is hc �rould give us a{�i,ice on this constructien. - Offcr � : a fair.price. . 1•4r. Nem�il:sen said yes he t•;ould, but i:hat he has no�: est�imated ii: �til �he ��;ay out . y-��. � 7he C7�:J� I•IIR��C'1' Sd1CI if t•ir. lienriksen. feels th�i:.he can Gid on ihis pi�o;;ec�, and. , ' g�ive us �Oi> cf�eaper p��ice, �,:e �•rould give ii: to him. He e::plaine� that by la��r �•re . have tu g�i��e the bid te th^ lc;•rest biduer. ihe Cii�� f�anager reminded t�lr. Ilerriksen ` 'fhai: he mus� realize th,re are ease�uents to accuire and i:l�ere is some ait�itional � eost of ini{�i,ove�ner�ts just for access. •• ' 41r. I�em,ii:sen said he ,�rould suc2gesl: just puti:ing in a paved rr,ad and it�r�ettir;g---- --- abotrt all tluse si:orri set•:ei•s. l�!e ha��e i;eve�, �•:orri�.d about it befcre. People a:ould h:ve ;! r:ore �aalual�le {;ro,.ertv ancf ti•re r_ould sell thc pro?er;:y ir.;t�ac� cf � p�'('.5(?Ili'.1f:�J �:I1�in �•rith �;i!i,000 bill. Fle Usked ii iile City sroulc+. be i��tc��estcd in Luying i:he E;rope��tv from h;m. . t•layor �lee rci7inded h1i•. lfem�i{:sen that:. this �•ras a � ut��lic ilearir.g, and t.he�� could not net into i.hat quest�oi�. ' , Pir.�Sa;iqster adcii•essed the Co�mcil arci said !�e thi��ics i:!iis sl�;o�il:! ;�e setticd once and for�all. 1 hear tf�is �ssessmcnt ior� the eigi�t�?ots ir� questier� an:' I think Lhe real quc:ction is ;•rl�eth��r i:iie individual pro��erty or�n�rs are goi�}�� 1:o pay t�� help devclo�� these athei� lots. 7his is the i-eal ci;;esi.ion. ?he proj('C�. Se��•,�es no ��tn�pose for �is. I an� t;�illing to pay my share, t�ui, ; cio rtot th�nl: 55,000 a?ot i� a ;,casonablc iicvcicpricnt co.t. • Cnuncilr;r�n.SC<<ri•r�:ii: said t:�e �•:ant io be able to seitle thi; c;uesiian toniqht. I eaoulei li(;e fia po:i:L out that 1dI1CI valu�>s ai,e increas�inq i`a.ster'±f�an co��s+.i•uciion ,;osts. , ' . , ' � . ; Tl�e Cit.y �f,tnaqer saici h� LI1111I:s the point is it yc�u ar�e c]oinc; t� >>�:L in scrv:ces;� you are qoiitq to s^r��ice tlicse people. Anothi_i� }>oint is i.he majority of F�cup'ic ��re - t•�illinq i.o pay� iheir s��;ire _ - 1•ia��or I�rc� �aid :�e icit: it tcuuid I:a��c to be figured uui: as far as ��s:.s. ll scems i.o I�iin <<s ti;;n�ql� i� coul�i he uone. Ilc as�.ed if aiiyone i•;as i:� fa��or of tl;e •,:a��ing pi•�;,+ect. � ' . Pir. f1�n 1!it�:c�n, Lot� 30 aiid 31 said that he has s^ci� this ticked a;��;unc� tor apprc�xi��i�iely r,ine ,yca�•s. 1'ou nevci• havc bcen ��bie to <{o ar.; t.,�in� �•rii.h •i;: yet. ilc sai�.i I�c r:oulu li{,c io scc it dc�vclo��ccl and �:t tlic sar�c tiire E>ut iii �i ucr,�nt road. ] du �:ol ap��rovc of an acccss lo Easl Rivcr fzo,id i}ecau�c, it ;s toa cian�cruus. t4r. !;oval; zai:l he jusL erantc�d to say t.h;�t he I;as L,�cn htrre !or nincicc�s yc�irs. f(e is noC abou;. io st�lri p�yinc� ;15,000 whcn lic �:tly h,�s onc v4ar lcft Lo f�inisn p:�y'ing for his �;roperty. • ' • • � � • . . .� ' �� '. i _ t ; i � e i_ t' �� ; :� �: s �� M `Z , . .� 0 .. . , �un�tc i�r.nit riG a��r.T�r1G or r�o��cr��rt �o, ��:; .� pnc,E 20 � � ..1�101�10'� by C uncilt�rar�»n Y.uko��rski to close the Public Hearinq. Seconded hy ' '. Co;�ncilman tarrralt.. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, t�a�-or ldee declared . the m otion ��rried unanimously, and thc PuUI ic Heari��g c.losed at 11 :19 f'.Dt. ' 7hc City hfa aycr said he believcs a poinL to bc made foi� closing ihc hcaring •� ,, is ih�+t �re I ave givcn noticc� j.o, evei•_ybody, and i,f the cul de sac is extcnded some ct the e pcoE�lc ti•�ii} be assessed also. They should Ue a�rarc of this - � additional osC. . �. • • PU[31.)C ili'/1f2II�G ON IhiPROV(:h1tIT: SPt^;IT/1RY �CbJCR, S•;/171:R /�NU STORht SCYlI:R 11119 The f'!�blic Idorks Director �lescribed this splii; is an e>;i:ension ot the sanii:ary ' sewer sysie , extendin:7 ta the cast to serve all thc propertics adjacent and sur►-o,mdin; the 4,i-o��oscd plat. l�he estiuiated cosi: to cr.Lc�id sanii�:ry se�;�e�-s is �• �13.00 �;er lineal i`c�ul. tde should be serving {�roperties �Zbutiing; Last River Road. � Councilman reider askr;i ii he could define $13.00 l�er lineal foo+.:. The Public 1�, i�l:s Direci:or said this is as it relates to thc property, ch�.rned on a. noi•iaal front footage. This ��ould include exi:c�nding thesc facilities and E�roceeding :� 1:o fhe north and cast e.nd tie into the er.tension of the �:�ater faciliCy. It ti�rould be �13.99 pe� foot and applied againsi: those pr•op�rties. t�ayo�- I;ee co r�tentr_d that it ti�rould �:hr.n be a total .ofi �2£i.UO. � :' � f.ounci'lman 6�eider said ti;e have �13.99 for �•rater and $13.�9 for se�-rer, that rrould . • be.{?II.00 pl s s1u.00 - totaling $4u.00 per foot. . : 7he ('ublic ld rks Di�,ector explained i:hat t4G.G0 per.foot does not include storm � sctiver tie in�o existie�y storri sc��•�er facilities at Rivervie�•r Terrace. � . 71ie �City P,ss ssot� said t;�hen tire yive fihe figure o� t�11,000, does�;'t th�it include ;� e��erything, rater, se�•rer, sioi•n� se�•�er and st:reet liil��l'0\�C'G1QII�.S in ti�e eight lots. � The Public IJ rl:s Dfrector said i:hat �•ras correct. He added that there rroulci be � .l�i or 15 ?at. . . ' . ' . � . . : . • A-resid;nt ( ot 32) saicf that he Las been thii�king about splittin�, the lots.. p� ' . , # 7he Fublic.l�1 rl:s Dii•r.ctor said thai: if in tfi�.fiiture lie ti�ouicl lil:e i.o split, de;;end- � inq o�t rrhen ,e: d��,:ides to do this, i.he si.oi,in se�;�ci° can be extended. 1'ou s•�ouid bc � assessed the �ridtL of tl�:e lot, and you a.ould fiave to picl; up this expense. '� 1•1r•. Uan Il��r�! eur, 7210 F��si: Rivcr Ro�d said ti•rlien he �ui-c � •� � � . I i�a _ cd h� s pror�ci ti� he i calleu tl�e C t�� ar�d ihey said i.l;e,y could install se�,�ei• and could go �mderi�eaLEi i Cas� r.ivcr R au and h�oi; up. �' 7he C.iiy I•la��g��r said i:l�at may bi� ,:r�.�e, J'ou coiild t�c hookcd u� oiito tLe se��rer `. i > but si.ill I.�e ciiarged t:�h��C a��orn�al lut cost is. ,' ' Pir. Ila�•vicur said thaL i.he City ti;ould aid iit gctcing �� l�eductiun ;oi° f.f�c in- convenience f �uinq uiicir.r Lhe streeC. , 1'I�e City t•tan��cr explained •that his costs aroulc; �bc the same rec�ardless which way � .thcy yo. . • . ' . � Councile�a» F izpatrick added ihat t.fic� assessment ��uld l�c o�� n IIO foot lot i'cyardlcss o ho;�r i4 'is houl:ed up. • . . •� Tlre Cii.y i•1an,qer expl,�ined that if �•�e do sc�meihing, ►�e should ha��c „n cst:�blished •plat�. . Set a �>�itt.ci�n and sticl: to lhaL e��cn if' �•:e do I10% lti'dllL t� do lhe entirc 1'rojri�t n��,� •car, �re slioul�! �;nr�, to��r,ir�.i; it. Thc: �,oint: i� �� sho�ilcl f.ind uu� � .from th�� drvelope�r t•rhr.thcr h� �vant:s it c�r n�i.. lt 1•�oulr( act!i,�lly I�e favo�•able for him. l f hc c oc ; not ��ant. i t, thc Gi Ly ciocs not. ' t•ir, il:�n�•i ksrn camc up ari Lh d . t'igure o( �.4.�UUU. , �� . � . . . , , 2 M �� .. � ,. . � . . , ;� . �.: ;: .. , '; , . ! ' � � ' � 1 - . ., . 0 ._.� , � ! � � .' i . . � . I �• M � . r�rr....�. 1��• � pi . � I . � � �.I . � ' � : , 1 �+ . . � �<' I t ,. • 'j �� . � ' . . f � '. • t .� ' .' ' � ,. � ��rr1��rl.r.rrr�..��+f�.��r•� rrrrrnr .-�� • I'IUQ41C IICAlt]I1G 11CCTIP;G UF 120VCt•11�f_R 10, 1975 , .. .. , . . ...'. ...'... . __� Itt� � • 2N. rnGr zi hr. ,i{ei�mi4:sr_n said he'arould not exreed $��f?.,000, fle e;:plaincd that he �•iould have p pay sc�wcr cl�ar,es to thc City {nr huol: up and addin�i on a parl: fce ��ould be ;,[l0U nrore. Iic said hc �•:ould 90 alon9 �:ith ��41,000. P�nythin9 ovcr that, we �, ay as �•rel l. closc the casc. ouncilman Stai-vr�lt said ,ou are sayir.9 no t.1i�n, because it could not be done for .�l1,000. I•�r. Ilcrn�iksen said I�e cannut ��y `��O,U00 cash. he Cily I•ianac�c�r advisec! h;r. Ilenriksen ihai: he l�as a.choice of ��uttinry it on an ssessinent, i,ut I•ir. Ilen�'il:sen said he could not �,ff�i•d Lo pay 7=;;'� interest on top f Lhe ;,41,(100. It rrculd not be fcasi!�le for him to c�o any fui�'ther: tr. Gordon Sr�n,'ster saiu hc �•,ould lil:e to speai� �or 1•;r. ^�oval:'s Lhree lats. lie r,plait�ed Lh�:t tlie f�roblc�:i in tI��C area of s�lit.t.ing ini.o tiu•ee lots is that it 5 a9ainst the c;cr.eral plennirq of the �rca Co do i.lri>:.,,i�d��storm,�serer�assessmentst s I:�ind of u°,ubsid>' of i.l�e l.��iildes�. l•!e have :�lreac(_� ��. ;e said in ne rray does it coi��e Lacl: on this pro4;osed road. h�. Nenri{:sen said i:e �•�c��;ld lil:e �o have accura.e fiqu�°es before he could say yes. he City I•fanaye�� saio $�!>,0�� ►�l:�s fi2,�00 park fees, $2,400 sc�•;�r cosis. ls i;hat�•. cee, tal;le. He said if not, tL-ey shoulcl not be talk;�,9 to othei, property 04YI1C'Y'S. �1r. Nenril:srn said he ;roi!lc1 go along �•rith.$45,000 but he ,•,ould not go along t•�ith ny �surpriscs aftcr that. lle City 14anager said• if it is any higi�e�° than that sae t•ro«ld chc�ck with h-im before oing on �-rith the �;roject. •,��. }ienril;sczi said Le r;ould iil:e it i:o �� on t�eco�-c ti�a� if it exceeds �45,000 he t�tould lii:c anotl�er rmetin,. l�layor t;ee said I�e ��elie��ec1 �re Lad all of 1:lie informat�ion desired, and asked for a motio« io close Lhe i'ublic Hearing'. • . I�OTIOf� b,Y Councilman fiiz��atrick to clo�e tf�e Public f{earing. Seconded by Courcil- maii Sta�•�;;a1L. l!po+-� a ��oice vot.c> a?1 �•otinq ,ye, M:,yoi� P:ee c(eclared the r�oti:,n car�ried unanir,,;,.usl��, and the Put>lic ile�u,�nq i:as ciosed at 11:50 P.I�?. SFC.ESS: , ` .. ' , 14ayo�� trec: ca1 �eci a rect�ss at 11:51 F.i�i. ' . �:rcorlt�i:��rn:_ � . . . Piayor !;�e rcca��vene;},ihc n,ecCing ai 12:0� �1.1�1. '. cot�StDfPAT10,� n� �-3�:sr ;� r,�>>i:� or nr, �,;��,1IiC.[" f Oi2 f:� �o��rr;c c:c�ur.sT: ?ar;Irac _._ __ -- - ----- -�--.� •--- - _',t.i;i ,('� /'� (�i - �l h0;'I1 t;,ii�l r�U lt1 hL101t i1,0;1 C-i$ IC R-?: ,; �r , , OR(itl:P.i,( I !� � i - ------- --- G!_i:L f�/t;.i 1 I(l�:i ( l) l� i f l l_i 5)� f ' i'l rl �1i l. Cl.I! ((_!1L ��t ..;Ul� : _ . lht� {'ubl �c Irorl:s Dire�-t.c•�� de.:c�';;>ed i.his as t� t �qu��i. ta recc,ne from C-1S tn . 1�-?., ta:.�-fa,��ily c1;,�ellirn� arca�:, .�nd it shquld be Gioin�cd out �iiat i�ic i'.ai;ninq Co�;�.mi�siun ri�co,;':;u��:ce! Y.i7 Council a�;prn��rl of tt�e 1'C,'.OIllllt) t�:th ihe stip!ilai:ion Lhat tl;e �,1ci pi,,no store 1oc„t�d on Parcel 9'l.0 Ue removeJ� betore ihc ::econd h�aring ��f i.he Or�finarce cr. this rezoni�ig. h1r. Oimsic��d,s��id tha; I�r- liad broii9!�L a bu}�er rrith him, and that t.hc sale ara.s conl:in9rnt u;�on t.!�e rc:o��iit�. Hc exE�l��ine�l Liiati it �ras prescntcd a� all of ti�e pro;�ert.y c}:�in�► to I�-2. 7he Pui>lic !:o?�1;s Dircctr.i�,cx�l��ined that. Lhere is a..iot �plit pendinq, and that t��is i; a'.��►�rn�tin� nn tJic :.uiiin9 requc5t. lie saici titic City i;as noti yet: ,�py r�vr:l thc lat. s�,l i t. ��. 1ir. Oln�str��u s,�ict th� lc�t �z,1iC is ju:i: acCu111y� i� ta►:c carc oi' thr. legt�l description, ard (.o dcscri:,c ii: corrc:cily o�.cc and for all. I� i ti i � t. � � � � ; . � � � ; : � � .. � ' � 4. t f � ; i f , � ; i , ..� • ! i ; � • :s � t f f .; . , } � t 7 j � � � . + . � ' � ;. � �1 • � .} , } . j #� � � j� �� I � � Q. � `� f ■ �� . � M � • � �� `d` _. , � d �� - . . a � `r�x• �->. . . � - � fi � � • . �,� { . � � .` � � .. ' * ' � � � ' * .Y ,' . t '. �� _ • . � . ' � _' ., � . � � � � I` � • ' � � \ r�, W ��I C, � iif � � � Q �, � � ; cu • 0 a... [3.. O � 2. tAhl�ll H —7% . � I '. � ! _ /( Jl / 1 � 0 .i � y �.� .-,. � �;r� t � � ! ��^�� r �.. _ e `�,' � V �.� 2" W � t�.! � � W l O O � W � �' ... � °'�•..�.� � °"�►-..... "'_. � � i 0 2� � � � � Q � N ' O -, . Z r_ z c,c � U� W - � � � .. W 4!J Li.1 - 7 Cn � ' --r LL� ►—t y�• (/) � O. �i � . � �Q� -.. . . . . r—� c�: H- �r_ t.�t }--o p - i—^ F— � F�^ W Q�c� � 3 cn . �._. - - t1y cn �c�i� n c�c�n I�J W UJ W c� c�, v, cf, O GC30 �].. Gl. O.. � 0 0 0 0 � ��a a �t o.. c� : � � I V � ( V I � � - ��t1��31 M3Tt1�3/1Id e AGRE�M�IdT Thi agreement made and entered into this day of 1976, by and between the City of Fridley, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Minne ota, h�reinafter referr.ed to as the "City" and Independent School District Number 14, Anoka County, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "School" (�T�iE EA:>, the School has ownership o£ Lot 30, Parcel 4900, Auditor's Subdivis on ��77; and WIIE L"AS, the City has adopted resolutions ordering final plans, estimates and spec fi�:ations relating to str.eet, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer improvem nt;� nortli of and adjacent to the aforementioned School property (as noted on attached Exhibit A); and t . WHE EAI�, the ordered improvements will be beneficial to the affected City resideni: aizd the School; and WHE�EA;, it is necessary thaL certain easements be acquired from tlie School to allow for construction of the improvements. NOW` TEiEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. Th�re will be no further assessment to th.e Scnool for the extension of anitary sewer and water facilities. .- � 2. The School will be assessecl a maximum of $670.95 for the storm sawer imr ovement costs based on the preliminary esiiniate of the improvement by the City. 3. The Sciiool wil� be assessed a maximum of $12,504.12 for street improve- men costs based on the pre�iminary estimate of: the improvement by the City. 4. The City will pay t.o tl-ie School $1,848.32 for the street and utility eas ment described on attached copy of Quit Clai� Deed (noted as Exhibit B) hich cost iigure is based on valuation established by the City Ass ssor's office. 5. The City will pay to the Sciiool $130 for the 10 foot utility and dra'nage easem�nt described on the attacl�ed copy of 4uit C1aim Deed (noted - as �,hibit C), wliich cost figure is based on valuation establislied by tne Cit Assessor's office. � ins fut The City will pay to the School $1,319.�E0 as compensation for the �ting sewer and water facilities locat�d in 7I2 Way NE initiaZly talled by the School which the City praposes to extend and use for ire deveiopment of the proposed Henriksen Addition. R � 3 Agr . City of Fridley/School District 4114 Page 2 3 A 7. The above iiems are contingent upon the City Council of the City of Fri ley adopting the resolution approving the final plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids tor Street Improvement Project St. 197 -1 and Sanitarv Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Project ��119. 8. That this agreement is val.id only for. the improvements proposed by St eet Improvement Project St. �976-1 and Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Se r Project 9I119 for develUpment of Henriksen Addition. AGREED T10 THIS DAY OF INllEPE ENT SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 14 Anoka C unty, Minnesota sy: _ Chai man By: Clerl � 1976. CIT�: OF FIiIDLEY By: Mayor - William J. Nee sy: City Clerk - Marvin C. Brunsell _, 1. . ; �� Ci�► �� 1 0 �s .s Ci' �. 4 � ` �ili Ci�V � h � Ci� � ��i� 8�c�aae �.�. s �� . • �'. 1 ��gsa��, �4.� ��":�' � �� P�si"0!� 1't! 1.�61 �i ida�� :��"�.� � �3l�� : n��3'' Sai��, �A� 3��►I Ai�� . � f �r ► �=�o�a �. �� I�#�s�9c�� $oe�l D9A►tY'S.oa �. � '�is �� im ��.+� �.�� . , �io Qi�r= �s� 4� ��4i� r�.�'��s�� 9 �av� `t�an p.�sa� � p�� i�°�t �� r�P� �� a�icra� �+f' � r �.e� �at�r e�via� 1� � .. It�l • �� `.,,.;�;�e`�i� �;� ��b ��,..�� r%�.dl�► Gitp �i�2I �ia8 �8 � .. �� `�a� �•�� I��a � �'� � � s ��.��i.�g ��• 1 � �s �� :�� .��.� �� ^�.�� i' �tu��e . t� �� '6�; S'°� ��ult� �f �� 1� �M Q� ��..� , �'�'��,� � i► �;� �'�,' ,, ,. • a�. � � ,2» � `1►� e � �,'��S' t.� �� ' � }� � �� 9 � ��.�°�°',�?�I � bi �'+�"�°,;,'� �* � �� ' s� i. �ii� �$� a.�a�'' $� �� c�'%� c ' �• �.� �,�.�� a . � � � � �� . � �� _�__� �� .� �� a.� c�� __ __ � ��.�_� _��a_�r:� `�_��`�'�-:.�� `�-.��...�:� ..ot,,��k� „�+�' ±�aisf ____ ��:� �� t � a �� tt�'�►� �� a � .� � �� .i W ' y � �f �� €a�� .. ;�.► 4�� 9.e�e ot ��57 ior �8 . t�� #' �9.� C : i�4�ro ea� °i�• _ �� _ ��c� ��a �°�� f�� , � t� 0�4 i� �� l.�i � �i� !� � '�� .�� f � & F , �"` �, ��esol � � �s ' �. o°" � � � ��":�T O. - � ,� Q 4 �� i'�� ;: � � - �� f. Lic�aa � � �� .� �� :�� e�t�` � � � ��5�� ],/� : �•��w s �€�i� eru�° �'�7.�,t;. g ��f' ti�• �►�4,�- ,�� 1�1€��►��s a priaa a;C f��o�J lt�s3' 1P tt�'4 � � � � t� � c�I ��r� � �+aat � �o ��t�k� � � !� �w hts origir�i. � �Y' �3�� t�hre Ba�w��a � ��. o�f �7t o R'� Ci�e �e.x�tictpa�� ia �hi� e�i tioald be 1/2 ��3�00• 0 , � 0 � � Ci� C p�e i n 17� R Gi�y of D�'Ldl�a ��' Mc�'Oil a7� i� �' �i at�on is rept'ot�•n1�Q � �rt0• at Lha Ci.�� • �� eQOUId bs d�not�! �1'� Ii�t at �� t�t� G�:a�� '"��r• � p,�;id py 4�s Ci�r �an elais � A,�,� D��tSiat° ! C�� C�.�' �� g!� $337•FA a �y I�ud �1�� +s� ��S�,t �• 4'�t� �e �ox �i�� ar• to bo 2�u°xsi�e� 1�' � Cr �► Oi' Piidl��s ��i �i � tr ti'ith t1� Gb�mrCi�a;f 10� 4�O . 01�. ' . � �� . � i�� xec�l�aAas air a� p�n� ��t �h� h�+ th� C�� Cua��Z � ��• . q�4 �'. �� P��aenb a' a re�sBL� �t �9 . ': e�r. �x ��a �'.� ii� � �� i��.�� d �a'sntin� ot� � 1 � �'�t� � r1�.� tls��e � ' . • 1��B�i � c�4��' ��€��:� � �i.�� t o.t •�l� � � � �� . �..��%� . � � �� 1. � �"�'*�� di� i�4.�a oY 4� �o� � at �� a�t �� [��. " . � �i u�� m�`£�t �tai� �b j�3. � �e'��'� � ��` „�. : �, � - .'^ . � �. ��i�ffi �i �IC�3(�, A�1�� Z�. : ]D. � � • �;:. � � ._ } y . �' . F s..-. ,•_ . �4� . �& a � K�3; 3� G '.tis;� �:`kt "� �� y �.. _ i • � 1 1 n 3C 0 � y. . �.... .,� � . • �j � « � . � , ,: \i;t ��1ii;':1� ��l,i��l� �11\L�� c�; PH�C: �•i,,� ,;�.:;?, ts��•r:i� t�n1�: .4:�rch ,Y, �, =�i + i . . ' 3D , , r;ir."t ti c'c�!4IM �U. f�U�11U" ' �F�"i' }�kV I'�IOQC� C.�t'.,��Iiv�:.i';� :��Z:OU�.� �'l�wZB;�► :Klll.:��t:. ,.,� ..: .tnc' Sct.o,�3.� Di � �r i ct T:o. 1L, Fricilsy, '�l':.ru�esotu � � . . . . . 1�... • � . � . . .�.. i � . . u� �, .�r ... l�. • .�. • • . . . '. . . ,rtf r � r� �. � . . , y _ � .. F.. � . . � . . .. i..� t. dL � - ....... . . ..__.._......�.- i. � I � p:•, �•rt cf�:�,t, ca.'• � . �. +�-� ti0 �Ea� i.-?^ . .�_i);'� ,:�i ►_ncrc�� c,:�. �: :�i sF:.:Er i.n ease:nent vF tt.f: .n: .. .: ��:nY�o� ::t; t. � i::t ��s�:ct.;�n ot cti.ver Crest Drive: ��r.. ;': . t :� ;,, ;�t a �;rac�r ;-r 0,1; �: to new �a-:lh;•le locatad aoproxi�nately 33a' e�� :.� ..:.v=sr •:r��st � �� ' �j?'176• 1ii`i�:`T't. . � .:u��,.' �C: .i;. n e �.5P,3 L�V�31' D6i,:1111�� - .. • 4 �/•+,� :"'J�.35 • .�'i• =ai. .'lt: . ,�:illi:'I� Ji'-��t�y� LOC2te .3u'rt�.,. _ . . _ '.:....:lA 7a ,, a • . ^ . c3%�'ii3"•1@ t � �i,/ �j � �, � G"Y^ •. c��`�4 � 7 =� L 0 7 D.YO AUt' � ._J � :x�crea � si��• -,r' wat�.r �ain ir. easo:nent !'roc� j" t� �;" .. ..• r�. J:ocate .water .ain 10�-.C" .�^:.�t'r. of cent�>rizna of ea�,;�:a�r:r ..� .-. �'' r': i��;y wiil provi� auditi.oi�a� �;:i�sc.:�+ezt }�:. this side o:' ex:s�:;.�:• .:.;;�=:aeni;. trovide nT�� fitt' _ at end of r,ain t.� a�l�� iut�.are extens;_:� �� c i "�;-:1 ��: to tne east. ��rov�a � 6" m�zn Leward �ui_ldi:�g ior dista:,�e �: �?'-'�". rrov:,�.i4 6"x6"x3" .tae at this pvin¢� o ,�. .- ��. � ADn �_.y.:. f '.�_ ' _ Provid siax?d3r�: cit;; �ire !�t/drant WI.LII �J�� valve ari�: �.�" risar c�ipe at �N�jr► n iee. • � ``` t? � 1?4K AJi � _ ��___._�_� ,�.Deduc 1�2 cest o',' increa:�?d ka�er ^�ain ��ze fr��,,i I.:+. :'��rr'.r �t' Qhtner's , grope ty to end ot' mai_n �:n ea�omen�. De�uct 1��? co:�L :' pr�v�din,^,, fire t�ydra t at a�d of water �ain� � � , . ... • : U'r�Ju:;'1' � �7 �? %�.� . ' � ( , � , _ ,�r fV C 1E :,� IZ Fi i) E. � i i=� r: �:. �� 7c t� E Fr�r � �� %; r, c:� r� I� y �.. � . , k, �. ,.� y. ----._ , " + �.. .�h. ,.,,� ;•. �,..i � f�.sr;i'r, fnr ,�n �u�� r�•:�:•i•: � � . ,.. • , . . ;.; ' �- a.i i �� t i�t �,. . . -�, � �:.( K •� � 1� i j�t npt��,i, tr� n;� :i:� _ _" .. _ _ 1 i'�� , , �tC:c.... . .... i�4 `-'� ��A�'. �/f ry � ' '1 'll'CC�•�l�Pi �( . � �'� . ' ' . . / . , �^ �r/ /' , , .,;� ., .., �� ./ ` . Y.o�iund ?lumc•int=..'� HQatinr Co . , '�.:�s1 �Cr; ilr `R:� l' .��lr:►r 1�,r � " • � 71�2�) :est Lake StraeL , . ,, � , :� :�. :�. ,.,. ,. . ...�, .�. �. � 1'}1F: fl1\'?.'1'F2 '(L � . .., t. _. rn . � . „ r�ikr t..� . ..yr ...t�.' � h.. , . . .. � , . • ' . � .. ,p. •. � i. � � , •p•. Pi.�1 �� :�r. ,�•�.�� •�..ir.i..., .�rld t�.�, �?�u�•� ..�. . . . . .. ., . ,�..�a� in•f�C.it� ':� {�I..u�nVl'� .. . i �I.� : . . .�i� rN'.r� c�•1��r. � l� 7t��•� .1�.l�:t.: � �� - j / / / ,� . . . i /L.�_ .t �� 1:�1� .: � i':\'1'�'It t�n�l E} IC'htif)•: �lr:' ;{r ,•F�t '�: . .\t' bt• L ' •. . . . ...� •,�:.•.�� l'h�'1'lil�. 'i'�til}2� t'll�l: � �.. , � �.•.w • . .k • . !t�Y eh��\�P InItA �i•��'.�'� e , . ��r :i�� . :i.�cd c ..iil•� � • , ' / � . ! �.,• ' t'i�. h� . _. ' ' i _ � , . . • i):ilr � � ti !-- . � � O �' Y H � G� �' W S � W � �--� d Q O � 4. `,e. EXNIBIT A -� � O C- y C_.) � O_ 4 1-• c_ LJ � W J W � O 0 3 t� w :� �-, � �°'� � ��- � 3�tfb�31 M3II1�3nI�i W J Q U N O Z � ..� . _ _- __� t � 3E` � z � W UJ � � � W W W � tn 3 Q � � d' F--i Y� Cn d Q � � � d c F-r CC F�- � W H 0 �' � � �""' w 4 Q �� w � c,� � _ F- - _ � V1 l0 07 r- � G]�0 W W W W N N tn cn O O O O 2 0. d � O G� O O d' Q' [Y LL' d 0. � � � I y, I ( V 1 � % �� / • r � � � \ t � � � , .. ' � � � ' � � \ � :� , � , � ' i � i � �I��N �it��I7CUli� �I(aclelAia .......................... ,/ of ............................da r Letwun...............................................................................................................».........................._........... �xniuil n 3 F ............................ 1�..........., a corporat ion under lhe latua of Ehe Sfate o/ .........................._.„._.............................................., paa•lJ oJ the f rst part, and . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . aeorporntion ientier the irc�Ua oj lAe Stcafe of .............................................................................__._..........................................................., parfy of tl:e seconct part, . � �1lhtC�5Ci1j, Thu.b the arzid pa.rEy oj lhe �'irsE pa��t, in tonsider¢tion of the au�n of _ ..............................................................................................................................._................................................_........................................ DOLL✓1IrS, . to it in hanct paid Ly iho sairl part� oj the accacd part, t3ee. recc,ipt tahcreof is hereLr/ acicraoicted¢rti, does 1+ereLJ C>'rant, �a� _Friin, �:tilclai.�r, antl Coni�n� unln tAe sard pn.rtrf of lhe aecond pmrt, its ataccessora ared assi.yns, Fa•ecer, all tAe truct............or par•cel......... of land 1�6n� a.ncl Lci»�' in tke CountJ of ....................... ...........,Anol:a .............................................ancl Sta�a of .1fi�anesala, desc.riLee� as follou•s, Go-u•il: A street and utility easement described as follocas: ExcepYinp, thaC part of Lot 30, Revised Audi.tor's SuUdivision 1177 lying �desterly �of a liue descriUcd as follows: Eeginning at a point on the I�orth line of said Lot 30 distant• 915 feet Westerly of the Vortheast cox•ner thereof; tl�ence Southerly alon� a straight line to a point on the Southerly line of Lot.27, Revised Auditor's Subdii�ision Ir'77, disL-ant 790 feet Westerly of Lhe Southeascerly corner ot said Lot 27, there terminating. tNow platCed as part of Riverwood Manor Addition) � Seginni-ng at the Northwest corner of rhe remai.ning part �i said Lot 30; thence Easterly alon� the NorCherly line of said Lot 30 ». distance af 607 feet; theace deflect to the rigi;� in a south�rJ.y direct.ion 90 degrees, 00 minutes a distance of 30 feet; thence deflect to the right i.n a westerly di_recti_on along a line parallel taith and 30 feet sout:her.ly of the nort}ierl.y line of said l.,ot 30 Co its point of intersection with the westerly Iiue oi tl�e remai.ning part. oi saic3 LoC 30; Chence northerly alono the westerly line of the remaining part of Lot 30 Co the point of beginning. _ ,_ _ A11 lying in the south half of Section IU, Township 30, Range 24, City oi Fridley, �County of Anoka, State of Mimiesota. The City of FridJ.ey hereby accepts this easement for street and utxlity purposes. Marvin C. Brunsell - City Clerk NO STATE DEEI) TAX R.EQUIREll 0 5tipu].ation This easement is c.ontingent upon the approval and construc�ion cf tk.e Street Improvemer.t Project St. 1976-1 and SSSStd it119 plans. 1:.0 �.�}AbC iTitti f0 ?�)OTitl f�jC �c1I11C: Toyether tui.th, ccll Ehc lrcredita.men.ts artt� appurEcttanees tlaera «nlo Lel�n?inr� or in. an.yirisc anpertninin;, to Wec said part� of llic second pa,��, its successors arzd assiyns, Fore.ver. � �_ In 1'resencr. uf 0 �ll �C5"ittit0l'l� ?ltr)CCCO�, T1ic snul fcrst partJ hcw c¢:tsed lhese presenfs !o Lc c.t�ecu.(ccl in ils corporaEt name LJ ita .................................._ Pres'uZent and its .........................................................and ils cvrporale scab [o ba iicrci��alo a�i.ced tJce da� and �car J'crst aGoi�e wriiten. � . � .... ............. . g � . _.___ � I3y Ilt ....................................Presidcnt Ils...._.............._�._ ................_.._... . .-----._. . .. . . ._ -- _,�,,,,;,f � � ��. f , � � a '' - � ��r, ;� . . ��p: � , . ; . *� - � . \ � .� • , _ ,, .� �� '.b . y.' . � � - * ' ' , � I . ri # � . \ , :�u��ur=_ _ _ _ __ ; ..- , � ' EXNIDIT C , � � . 3G 'Li�t5 �n�eiiturc, �,r�:� tn��......_...._........._ ..............._. ....:�u, or......._..._....._................_.__.:..._.., ��.......M.., a�a�„u►► .._...._._ ................._............._..._.._..._......................._.._..........___._._......._...._.............__....._..._._......._....._....._._.___......._._.__.._.....�. __ a corporatio» �ander the lawa of lhe Stala of ...............1'llriT2es.atd._...._.._._.....••--•-•••••••, Pcu'G�✓ o/ l)ce �r�t parl, and _......._..._ ...... .......:....C.i.ty...n.f....E.r.:i.dl ey.............................................................................._.............................................._........_._._,............._........ �IlUYiTCT�7 ]�'�i lu��` er E)ea Iuwr of tne st�.t� o}' .............t•linnesn.ta...............................__......._...._...._..._...._........__............___......, pn�•ty oj liie sr.cGnil pa.rt, , l.t�littC��Cl�, 1'haE the saicl partf o% Elu first pcir-E, in to�esidaratiu» of Eha � atem. of _ ..............._........_....:.......................................................................................................................................................................................... DO1.L.17ZS, to it in Tenracl paid tnj t]ees saul parfJ of tl�, a^eon�l part, (.Tte• rectipE u�herr.of is leereLy a.cTenaciecl_SztL, durs herebJ Grant, G�ar�ain, Quitclairr.•, cn�l Consrr/ u.iato tiac. sa.id parGrj of 1.he second pnrG, its aucce3sors ¢nd assi�sas, Fnrec•er, r.11 EI:e tract............or �:arcel...._... of Iaru2 lyi+ey tantl Lein? in !Ae Counl� of ....................... _ ............._.ApD.{ut......................................and Sta.te oj .9linncso±a, desr.ribc;i ns followx, to-v,�iE� ' A 10 foot utility and drainage easement described as follo��s: EXCEPTIMG That pai°t of Loi:s 2�, 29, and 30, P.evised P.uditor's Su�;livis�on 'i77 lying !•lesterly of a line described as follo��rs: '_ Beginning at a point on the Plortli l�ine of said Lot 3U distant 915 feet tdesterly on tne rior�r�EaSt corner thereof; t�,enc2 ' Southzrly alonc; a straig'rzt �line tu a point un �the Sautherly line of Lot ?.7, Revised Auditor's Subd�ivision �77, d�istant 790 iee� l�fest�rly of the Southea>terly corr�er of said Lot 27, there termina�ing. (Nrny platted as part of Riverwood Manor Addi i:ion) . The 4lesterly 10 feet of Lots 29 and 30, �tevised Auditor's Subdivision �`77 ; and: � ' .. The Ptortherly 7.5 feet of the 41est 10 feet of Lot ?_�, Revised Auditor's_ •-- Subdivision n77. � All lying in th2 South half of Section 10, Tov:nship 30, (:ang2 24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Plinneseta. . The City of Fridley hereby accepts i:his easernei�t for utility and drainage purposes. i•1ARVIt� C. aRU`iSELL - City� Clerk NO STaTE UEED TAX REQUIRED r0 ��)1be eTriD f0 �)OYt� f7jC �:�lfliC, To�clhLr uz.ih all the I:ercdi.fanLCnls arul apptirlanancea t1+.ero- tentu LeLw��%ir:6 or in a�c��se apPer{air.irty, tu t7�c said par1J of the secund paa-t, iEs s:iccessors ar.d n_ssi�ns, Tor-cz,zr. !n Frrsuue uj �Il �£��ItITtOtip lT�i�jCl'CPf, Thr aci.rl fcrst po.rtJ hna ca:uscd thtse prr,sents to be e.zec�clecl ii� its corporr�tr. nurne LJ ii� .................................._ Pr<•sidcnt a.nd its .............._......................._................nnd i.ls corpDralo sc[:l to Le hrre��nlo a/Ji.��ed lhe du� and Ucar frsl aLoee turiiEcr. 13�...�....�..�...�....�..�...�..�......�...��...._............_ ............._.__.. tts...................................Prrsid e nG r�._.._..__.._._........_.._...._.._......._ � • �� '*�ri�ea�x�mt�t1r.[tttst�: ... .. '�'N.r'�sc�,•��^�t*s�'�m� .. . �. .��!��'.�aa'!'v."�"X.�-z1r„rFx;�r�r-,� •.-•-,,k, ^-.-°s • � � 1 n ' RESOLUTION N0. iOLUTIOIQ ORD�RING IrfPROVE1�iLNT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND OP�DERING ZTIS�MLNT FOR BIDS: WAT�R, SANITARY SEWER AND STORPI SEWER )VEMENT PROJ�CT ��119 � WHE EAS, Resolution 4�195-1975 set the date for hearing on the improve- ments, as specifically noted in the Notice of Hearing attached thereto for reference s Exhibit "A"; and � WHE EAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed with the m king of the improvements (as noted in said notice) were given ten (10) d ys notice by mail and published notice of the Council hearing , through tw (2) weekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held a d the property owners heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in said . notice; an � , WHE EAS, Resolution ��209-1975 adopted by the City Council of the City of rridley ordered this improvement. , NOW Anoka Coun 1 �. ' ' i � � 2. 3. � � i i THEREFORE,. BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of.Fridley, :y, Aiinnesota as follows: 0 , That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution ��195-1975 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as _ reasonably possible, to-wit: � Water mains, sanitary sewer, laterals and service connections, and storm sewer and appurtenanc�s; to serve the following properties: Lots 3I-35, Revised Auditor's Subdivision No. 77 (which includes the proposed Henriksen Plat) and Lot 3, Block l, Mississippi View Addition That the work involved in said improvements as listed above shall hereafter be designated as: WATER, SANITARY SEW�R & STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 4�119 The plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works Director for such improvements and each of them, pursuant to the Council resolutions 1leretofore adopted, a copy of which plans and specifi- cations are tiereto attached and made a part hereaf, are hereby approved and shall be riled with tYie City Clerk. The work to be perforried under WATER, SANITARY S�W�R & STORM SEWER IMPROVL'MENT PP.OJ�CT ��119 shall be performed under one contract. 4 IRes. No. Adv. for B ds �i119 -2� � The Public Works Director sha]_1 accordingly prepare and cause to be , inserted i the official newspaper advertisement for bids upon the making of such im rovements under such approved plans and specifications. The adver- tisement s all be published for three (3) weeks (at least 21 days) and shall speciiy th work to be done and will state that bids will be opened and con- sidered at 11:30 a.m. on the llth day of Plarch, 1976 in the Council Chambers , of the Cit Ha11, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the P blic Works Director, and accompanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, � or certifi d check payable to the City for five percent (5%) of tlie amount of such bi . That the advertisement for bids for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewe Project ��119 shall be substantially in form as that noted in � Exhibit "B' attached hereto for reference and made a part hereof. � ADOI „ + DAY a �� D`� ATTEST: � - ,� • . �9ARV IN C . ] �r' , � . `'' ' � . . . .• } � �.. . , � y i . � -- 1 � � ' 'TED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS OF , 1976. SELL - CITY CLERK w i WILLIA�1 J. NEE - MAYOR 4A ' � ''� i Sealed bid County, Mi I , March, 197 installati NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS will be received and publicly opened by the City of Fridley, Anoka nesota, at the office of the City Manager, on the llth day of at 11:30 a.m. for the furnishing of worlc and materials for the n of Water, Sanitary Sewer and Stor.m Sewer Improvement Project 4/119. The projec consists of the following: Sanit ry Sewer: 1,294' of 8" P.V.C. with related appurtenances Water; � Storm ' , All in acc< Minnesota t ' Minnesota ` 870' of 6" C.I.P, with related appurtenances Sewer: 928` of 15" R.C.P. with related appurtenances rdance ¢:>ith plans and sPecifications prepared for the City of Fridley, y the Public Works Director, 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, 5432, Telephone 571-3450. Plans and pecifications may be examined at the office of the Public Works I� Director, nd copies may be obtained for the contractor's individual use by applying t the engineers and depositing with tlie engineers $20.00 for each set. The eposit will be refunded to each bidder submitting a bonafide bid upon retur of the documents in good condition within ten (10) days from the date ' of opening bids, and to non-bidders upon return of the documents in good condition, prior to the bid opening. i � � , , Bids must e made on the basis of cash payment for the work, and accompanied by a cash dep sit, certified check (on a responsible bank in the State of Minnesota), or a bidde 's bond and made payable without c�ndi�ion to the City of Fridley, Minnesota n an amount of not less than 5% of the total amount of the bid. The City Cc any inform� No bid may By order oi Dated this Publish: �uncil xeserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive �lities in any bids received without explanation. be witndrawn for a period of thirty (30) days. : the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota. 9th day of February, 1976. Sun bruary 18, 1976 bruary 25, 1976 March 3, 197G Construction Bulletin February 19, 1976 February 26, 1976 March 4, 1976 i�asim ri. Qureshi, City Manager City of Fridley 4B �. , � ' , � ' � � RESOLUTION N0. SOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING RTTSEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVCbiENT PROJECT ST. 1976-1 REAS, Resolution # 196-1975 adopted by the City Council on the 20th pf Oct. : 1975 set the date for hearing on the improvements, as specifi ally noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A", and REAS, all property owners whose property is liable to be assessed with the mak ng of the improvements (as noted in said notice) were given ten (10) days no ice by mail and published notice of the Council hearing through two (2) weekly ublications of the required notice, and tlie hearing was held and the propert owners heard thereon at the hearing, as noted in said notice. �RE�1S, Resolution ��i�205-1975 &��208-1975 adopted by the Council of L.ie City of Frid ey ardered all of these improvements. Anok a C ' 1. ' � ' � ' � � ' , I ' �� '�i 2. , THEREFQRE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, unty, Minnzsota as follows: , Tha� the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution___ � 196-?975 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonable possible, to-wit: Street improtTements, includir�g grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, wa.ter and sanitary sewer services, storM sewer and other facilities, located as follows: 53� Avenue 7th St. to Madison St. 56th Av�nue 4th St. to 6th St. 57th P1ace 4th St. to 7th St. � 60th Avenue 5th St. to 7th St. 5th St. T. 694 to 57th Ave. 5th St. 60th A�e. to 61st Ave, 6th St. I. 694 to 57th Ave. 6th St. 60th Ave. to 61st Ave. 71� Way F.iverview T�rrace to �ast {PrQposed Henr.zksen Plat) Alden Way 7112 Way to North That tl�e work involved in said improvements as Zisted above shall hereafter be designated as: STRF.ET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1976-1 The plans and specifications prepared by th� City Engineer for such improvetnents and each of them, pursuant to the Council resolutions heretofore adopted, a copy of which plans and specifications are hereto attached ard made a part hereof, are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. 5 , ' Resolution o. � Adv, for Bi s St. 1976-1 -2- II ' 3. The work.to be per£ormed under STR�ET Ir�'ROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1976-1 �� shall be performed ur_der on.e contract. ,' The City Engineer shall accordingl_y prepare and cause to be inserted in � the offici � newspaper advertisements for bids apon the making of such improve- ments unde such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be ', � published cr three (3) weeks (at least 21 days) and shall specify the work to be done an will state that bids will. be opened and considered at 11:00 a.m. on the llt day of Marchy 1976 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, and � that no bi s will be considered unless seaZecl and filed with the City Engiener, and accomp nied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or certified cYicck payable to the � City of Fr. dley for five percent (5%) of the amount of such bid. That the advertisem nt for bids for STREET' IMPRO\�EMENT PROJECT ST. 1976-1 shall be sub- ' stan.tially in form as L-hat noted in Extiibit "B" 3ttached hereto for reference ' i and made a part hereof. I� •�- AUO TED BY TH� CITY COUNCTL OF THE CITY Or Ta'RIDL�Y THIS � - DAY OF , 1976. , ♦�r� r �"b. . T �� - MAYOR ' � WILi�IAM J . NEE _ .. � AT�'EST: I�`� + . ' ., . a. ' - - � . . ' MARVIN C: BRUNSELL - CITY CLERK r ' . . ,. I � •. ' � � � � . . -' - , _ _ _ _.._ ._ . _ _ _ _ I. � - - _ . _ I' . � . . , ' . i ' • II. � ' ' 5A � � ' � , ' � ' ' ' �� J ' ' r, NOtICE TO QIDDERS � Se led bids will be received and publicly opened by the City of Fridl°y, Anoka C unty, Minnesota, at the office of the Public 4lorks Director, 6431 Univers ty Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432 (Tel. 571-3450) on the ddy of Mati..rq , 1976 at 11:00 A.M., and will be con- sidered by ihe City Council of the C�ty of Frtdley at a regular'�1976i1 Meeting at 7:30 P.tf. on the 15th day of March for the furnishing of work and materials for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 197 6-1. miles mate he street projects are about 1.38 ' long and consist o� the follo��ing principle items of work and approxi- �ntities R' N. Sob� Avenue Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B-618 Aggregate Base Class V Bituminous Material For Mixture Wearing Coarse Mixture 14,824.00 Feet 6,757.19 Ton 248.72 Ton 3,826.43 Ton li in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by Richard iech, P.E., Public Worl<s Qirector, Fridley City Hall, 6431 University N.E., �rid7ey, Minnesota 55432. T�lephone 571-3450. 0 P ans and specifications may be ex�mined at the office of the Public Works irector and copies may be obtained for the Contractor's individual use by applying to the Public Works Uirect�r and depositing with the Public Works Director $25.00 for each set desired. The deposit will be re unded to each bidder submitting a bonafide bid upon return of the docum nts in good condition within ten (10) days from the bid opening date. ids must be made on the basis of cash payment for work, and accompanied by a ash deposit, certified check (on a res{�onsible bank in the State of Minne ota) or a bid�er`s bond made payable �vithout condition to the City of Fridl y, Minnesota, in an amount of not less than 5% of the total amount of the b d. . he City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any infiormaiities in any bids received witheut explanation. 'bid may be witi�drawn for a period of thirty (30) days. order of the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota. ted this 9th day of Febr�ary , 1976. Publ shed: Fridley Sun February 18, 1976 February 25, 1976 March 3, 1976 Richard N. Sobiech, P.E. Public Works Director Construction Qulletin Fet�ruary 19, 1976 February 26, 1976 t�larch 4, 1976 � �� 0