The URL can be used to link to this page

07/19/1976 - 5714JANET KONZAK ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT PUBLIC HEARING MEETING JULY 19, 1976 �.-t - _ ..c MEMO T0: DEPARTMEfYT HEADS I' � Following are the "ACTIONS NEEDED". Answers are due in the City Manager's ' office by Wednesday Noon, July 28, 1976. Thank you. � FR�DLEY .CZTY CQUNC�L � PU�L�C HEARIN6 MEETI.ivG � JULY :19., 1976 -- 7c3Q PM PLEDGE OF�ALLEG�ANCE; _____T�� Given ROLL CAI:L: ' Al1 Present ' ADOPTTON OF AGENDA: � As submitted � PUBLIC HEARI�NGS:� PUBL.IC HEARTNG ON AMENDMENT TO LONING CODE, CHAPTER I ZO��IOI WNICH WQl1LD CHANGE �rBARS AND TAVERANS�� FROM A PERMITTED USE IN C�Z AND C—ZS ZONED DISTRICTS TO A � _ . ... . PERMITTED USE WTTH A SPECIAL. USE PERMIT, . � . . . � . � . � . �. — 1 D Pubiic Hearing closed � ENGINEERING ACTION NEEDED: Put ordinance on next agenda for first reading � • , . .. . .. _ . , . PUBLIC HEARING QN VACATTON REQUEST, STREETS AND ' ALLEY VACATION SAV #%6^O3 BY ROB�RT SCNROER; GENERALLY LOCATED AT %%�l� UNI.VERSITY AVENLIE N.E. ..�...� Z— 2 B Public Hearing closed. First reading of ordinanc� adopted � ENGI�VEERING ACTION NEEDED: Put ordinance on next regular meeting for second reading � � ' 0 , . . , ' PUBLIC KEARTNG MEET�f�G. JULY 39�, .1�7'6 . . . . . �.. .. . . � PAGE 2 i ! � PUBLTC HEARIPdGS CCQI�TTNUED�� i PUBLTC HEARI`NG ON TMPROVEMENT; STREET I.MpROVEMENT PRO�ECT ST, 1975�+, . . . .� .� . �. . . . , , . � . . . . , , . 3 — 3 A Public Hearing closed ENGINEERING ACTION NEEDED: Put resolution approving improvement on next regular agenda for consideration _ 0 idEW BUSINESS: �� , �CONSIDERATION OF COOPERAT.T.ON AGREEMENT/FI'NANCIAL PARTICTPATION 1�%6 PASSENGER WAITTNG SHELTER PROJECT . AGREEMENT WTTH METROPOLTTAN.TRANSIT COMMISSION ' . .. . .. . .. .. . .. CONTRAGT �do, 76�35-23�id , , . , . , . ... , . . . . . . . . . 4 — 4 C Agreement approved ,' ENGINEERING ACTION NEEDED: Administration execute agreement ' ADJQUR�� 9:ZO P.r�. 1 - � ' FRIDLEY CTTY COUNCIL MEETING , PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTER�STED IN 'NAME ---=-----=---------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- E -------------------------------------- ----------- �� A ay 12 .�-�l � �� i(�c, � S t I L ^ 1 e� i7o A v��U� � 2y5� �t � ,� � � �, ;'' h %� vI'I nk...f o li? G� ., c /xeivt � � , �>� y� •� ' ' �¢- � � 1 �� / ti� � 1 S � � �7 s� �� Y � '� �,i, .,.� .�- (i l ��.,�c- � y ,,�.t � /r �� 3 - �C�r.� ��z� a,� �� . � � � ' . � . , � � -� -� -� � �,�-�- �� - � , � � %' .� ADDRESS DATE : � �; 9 �� ,. ITEM NUMBER � � THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF THf FRI•DL.EY CITY COUNCIL OF JULY i9., 1976 , � ' ' , . � ' ' > 1 ' ' t ' 1 ' i � ' � ' ! ' � ; � ' ' � � � I � ' � Z�f� THE MINU7ES OF THE PUBLIC NEARING MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF JULY 19, 1976 The public hearing meeting was called to order by Mayor Nee at 7:40 p.m. on July 19, 1976. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: • ° Mayor Nee welcomed the audience and invited them to join with the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilwoman Kukowski, Councilman Starwait, Councilman Hamernik, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Mayor Nee. MEMBERS ABSENT: None ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS: , PUBLiC HEARING ON AMENDMENT TO ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 205.101, WHICH WOULD CHANGE "BARS AND TAVERNS" FROM A PERMITTED USE IN C-2 AND C-ZS ZONED DISTRICTS TO A PERt�iITTED USE LITTI-1 A CDCf T 111 IICF DCUM7T • . MOTION by Counciiman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the notice and open the hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:42 p.m. The Public Works Director reviewed the recommendation from the Planning Comnission and the Chapter of the zoning code which it would affect; that bars and taverns only be allowed in C-2 and C-2S areas with a Speciai Use Permit. Several weeks ago there was a revised beer licensing code and there was some revision as far as definitions and that is still being revised and will probably be before you next Monday, Juiy 26, 1976. This whole discussion arose with the issuance of a beer license to an industrial piece of property on Main Street and hopefully with this requirement and the revised definitions in the ordinance this type of thing could be controlled better. At that time there was nothing specific that would indicate that this would happen. Now they would be allowed in C-2 and C-2S with a Special Use Permit. Under paragraph B of Section 205.10 are the uses permitted in C-2 and C-2S, and Number 5 will be stricken and will be inserted as paragraph "Q" so that we would then allow bars and taverns with a Special Use Permit. Mayor Nee asked if the effect does not change the zoning where it is permitted, or not permftted, and the Public Works Director replied that this would a7low a pub]ic hearing. The City Attorney said that he would recommend this. It would provide an opportunity to reject an application in the zoning area if there was a valid reason and the CounciT found that it would not be �n the best interests of the City to have the bar or tavern at that particular location even though the zoning was proper. Mayor Nee asked if there was anyone in the audience that would have any comments on this. Is there any reaction to the concept of requiring a Special Use Permit for the use of a beer Ticense that is not required now? There was no response from the audience. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick that the public hearing be closed. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared� the motion carried unanimously. The public hearing closed at 7:51 p.m. r � i � i "� � "� .� '� '> � � � � +� �� lU4 PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JULY 19, 1976 PAG'E 2 STREETS AND ALl_EY VACATION SAV #76-03 BY ROBE UNIVERSITY AVEfJUE N.E. AND CONSIDERATION OF AN PdUE MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, ail voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:52 p.m. 7he Public Works Director said that this is a request for vacation of a street right-of-way located just to the west of University Avenue and the west service drive north of Osborne Road. He illus;.rated his remarks by pointing out on a diagram the parcel of property and said that with the development of this property by Kennedy Transmission, who has proposed to construct a building in this area, there was a discussion regarding the future of this entire area in that certain lot splits have been previously approved and that the property was becoming landlocked, or would be, if certain easements were not maintained, and at that time it was hoped that the developer, Mr. Schroer, would indicate that what he plans to do would eliminate the need for the roadway. In order to develop this, Kennedy Transmission needed the entire property, so they requested that the roadway be vacated and that an easement be obtained to the south. At this time we do have an easement of 50 feet, and so the item before you is a vacation of 33 feet with the stipulation that existing utilities be maintained. Mr. Schroer was contacted, and he has a representative here. Mr. Schroer's son said Mr. Schroer asked him to come to the meeting. Mr. Schroer will not be able to make it until 8:30 as Monday night is a bad night for him. Mr. Schroer's son didn't know what else to say. He said maybe you can postpone it until 8:30 or 9:00. The Public Works Director stated that he didn't know of any reason to delay the matter. They can come up to the easement with parking facilities, but with the roadway they would not meet certain requirements. The Public Works Director had another request regarding the closing on the sale of the property being contingent on the vacation. The request is that perhaps it would not be out of order to adopt the matter as the first reading of the ordinance. Normally it is not City policy to take action on a public hearing like this. Mayor �dee said that his only concern is: are you convinced that the revised plan wiil function? That this is really not cutting off potential service? The Public Works Director replied that it would not. There was,a discussion in the minutes of the Planning Commission where the remark was made that the petitioner understood that he would eliminate the closed street in the rear and all industrial property would be faced off Ranchers Road. We would not have that road back there at all. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:05 p.m. t40TI0N by Councilman Hamernik to suspend the normal policy and consider this the first reading of the ordinance, waiving the reading and adopting it on the first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. The Public Works Director stated it was all that portion of the southerly 33 feet of the easterly 200 feet of Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition. PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JULY 19, 1976 PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1975-4: PA�E 3 ]�5 MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, and the public hearing opened at 8:08 p.m. The Public Works Director stated this is for intersection improvements including resignalization, channelization and some other intersection modifications at Mississippi St. and Osborne Road. This is a project �n conjunction.with tne State Highway Department, and Federal funding wil] be involved with the improvement. He said that some state representatives are present to answer any questions regardiny the improvement. Several men from the Minnesota Highway Department then distributed literature to the audience and to the City Council. The Public Works Director stated that the improvements on Mississippi Street will involve a right-turn lane in the northeast and southwest corners, and the extension of an existing median on the east side together with a bike�aay/walkway plan. At this time, it is anticipated there will be no assessment in this area. However, ' , not knowing what the final costs will be, we have notified all the affected property owners so that they would be aware of the improvement and know what is happening, and let them know these are estimated costs. , There wi11 be Federal funding; and a n�ajority of this will be picked up by the municipal state aid. The improvements on Osborne will consist of a similar situation, the installation of inedians, developing right-turn lanes and 'he construction of �� bikeways/walkways that will tie into our overall bikeway/walkway plans. � � , The cost is based on the estimates we received from the State together with our additional right-of-way costs, and it will result in $8.02 to residential property that is affected on the south side of Osborne Road just east of University Avenue. This $8.02 was developed on the existing policy that the City has regarding the concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk. The remaining costs after the curb and gutter is taken off is assessed against the correnercial property. This is �16.22 per foot. The State Highway Department does have some maps and plans on the wall. Some are in this room> and some are out in the hall. Perhaps we could have a recess for ten minutes so everyone can see them and ask questions. Mr. Marvin Brunsell, Finance Director, said the map, or the transparency, shows the , front foot assessments in red, and the side street assessments are in blue. That would be $1.52 per foot for the cost of the side yards spread down tfie block for commercial property. There are no side yard assessments on residential properties. ' I� ' I ' The Public Works Director asked if there were any questions, and there was no response. Mayor Nee declared a ten minutes' recess. (Recess taken from 8:16 p.m, to 8:35 p.m.) Mayor Nee reconvened the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. The Public Works Director stated that on Mississippi Street there is anticipated federal participation. On Osborne Road there are two alternates, and that alternative No. ] is the most expensive of the two, lie said that the City staff recorrmends that alternate No, 2 be selected. The residential assessment is based on the established policy of the City where single family residences on County roadways are assessed for sidewalk and curb and gutter and the remaining costs are assessed to the benefited commercia] property. Mayor Nee asked if the project were to cost less, then it might be possi6le that it would be 56.00? The Public Works Director said that there is sone indication of that. At this point in time there is some cost for right-of-way costs in there, and he is anticipating that the cost will be a little bit less. If the shift is to alternate No. 2, the proposal is to take away some 15 feet of peoples' lands for which they would be paid and their assessment could be reduced on a front foot basis. In alternate No. 1 they do not acquire any of this land. ; _ i i ! 1aG PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JULY 19, 1976 Mayor Nee asked for comments f.rom the audience. PAGE 4 Ms. Norma Swanson, 361 Rice Creek Terrace, is with Theisen, Inc., and are the owners of the property which Red Owl is on. She wanted the City Council to be aware that this does involve a long-term lease. The diagram shows that it will take away some parking spaces from Red Owl. Their lease contains a condemnation clause, and everybody is well aware that the vacant area next to Red Owl is residential. That property cannot be used as a parking area. The Council should take into consideratio� in condemnation> it is a 15 year lease. Mayor Nee asked what is the complication, and the reply was that you would be takiny the parking spaces,which they already have too few of and would not be able to replace it according to the zoning as it sits right now. Mayor Nee asked if it was her argument that it would put the lease in jeopardy, and Ms. Swanson said yes, definitely. There is a condemnation clause in the lease, she said, and she does not know the exact wording, bu� she could provide it and it will have to be contended with one way or another. The Public Works Director said that they would be taking stalls away; goiny from 80 to 72. Mayor Nee asked if the City were to waive that part of the zoning code relative to parking would the lease be in jeopardy? Ms. Norma Swanson replied that she didn't know if Red Owl would accept that. She said she would provide the City with a copy of the lease. The City Manager said that the R-1 zoning permits parking; that that is one of the considerations that ca� be given. Mr. Kenneth Bloom, 330 Osborne Road, said he is not completely convinced of how much benefit the people along this area will get; I, for one, needless to say. He is not quarreling with the Minnesota Highway Oepartment's study that a high accident potential does exist there. He has had the opportunity to observe that himself and is sure the rest of the people have also. However, �reducing the accident potential by this method does not give a benefit by losing a portion of our property. Ostensibly we are paid for it, but in turn we will be assessed on the premise that this benefits us; that �ae are directly benefited by it. Mr. Bloom fails to see if tne individual benefits, and feels they will ultimately end up trading dollars, and certain questions could arise in terms of peoples' mortgages. Mr. Bloom wonders if those factors could be ans4vered to their satisfaction. Mayor Nee told Mr. Kenneth Bloom that the City would end up doing one thing or the other. One being that the City would acquire 15 feet of his land which will end up not costing 1�1r. Bloom as much in terms of cash; or the other would be where the City does not acquire the land and it would cost him more in cash. Which of those two situations would you prefer? The Mayor said that he was just asking a question. Mr. �loom said, which is the lesser of the two evils? It all depends. He could care less if he had less front lawn to mow. He said he didn't like to do it anyway, but there are other people that feel differently. Mr. Ralph 6. Lynn, 7599 University Avenue N.E., said he lived on the corner of University Avenue and Osborne Road, and his lot does not fit the category. Mr. Lynn remarked about the hedges that would be lost to him. The Public Works Director said that if Mr. Lynn were compensated for the loss of the hedges he could re-establish them. The reply was that he wouldn't live that long. The hedges are 18 feet high and very full. It took years for them to get there. The City Manager replied that Mr. Lynn would be compensated and he could put in some fast-growing hedges. 0 i i � � �` � k '�1 �� a �. i ' PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JULY 19, i976 PAGE 5 ♦ i� R f ( Mr. William Swanson, 310 Osborne Road N.E., said he is not quite sure on the costs of alternates No. 1 and No. 2. Alternate No. 2 would cost him $8.00 per foot, and he wou7d be reimbursed for the land. How much would that cost? Mr. Swanson said if you go to alternate No. 2, and take 15 to 25 feet of his land, you are cutting down on the size of the property, of the lots> and he is also sure there is reimburse- ment for the amount, but you are also cutting down the value of his property. The City Manager replied that if you can estabiish your value of the property which would be depreciated by law, the City has to compensate. That is what you will be compensated, Your compensation is not for 15 or 25 feet but how much it will affect your property. It will establish the value of the land, not just the 15 or ZO feet of the property. Mr. Swanson asked if each piece of property would be dealt with individuaiiy, and the City Manager replied yes. Mayor Nee said that in the event we took alternate•No. 2, it would cost less out of the pocket and you would also lose some 1and. The City Manager asked �f the Minnesota State Highway Department representative would mention the different steps that are used to acquire the land, the process, so that the people would know. It is a lengthy process. ° Mr. Howe: I am the District Right-of-Way Engineer. First of all, the title information ' would be obtained as to the ownership, mortgages, leaseholders, and so forth. The ' .property is then appraised. In the case of the Minnesota Highway Department we have two appraisers. In the case of the City or County, I am not sure when the City or County acquires property. 1 � �� I� � , The Public Works Director said that at this time it is a county roadway and we would expect that they would, but there are other areas. It is a joint project. Mr. Howe: TNere are one or two appraisers that appraise the property. The City or County may hire an appraiser or use one of their staff, and then an offer is presented ; to the lot owners, and the property owner does have the right or the opportunity to accompany the appraiser at the time the appraisal is being made. The offer is made to the property owner and at that iime the property owner does have the right to have the propert;� appraised and be reimbursed for the cost of the appraisal up to �300. • That is not a fixed figure, but the cost for the appraisal can be taken up to $300, and after that if the property owner and the City or the County cannot reach a settlement then the eminent domain would be consumated by the City or the County at which time then it would go to the District Court and then three or four appraisers are appointed by the District Court to come up with the value, and they will eventually file their report as to the value of the property, and it is up to the property owner and the City to agree on this or have it appealed and take it to a , jury trial. • The City Manager said the City or the County could have an appraiser to establish the � value of the property. If the property owner desired to, he could hire dn appraiser in whom he had confidence and he could collect up to $300 for the appraiser's fees. Up to this point there is no cost to the property owner at all. He doesn't spend a penny out of his pocket. It could then go to the District Court and three commissioners would be appointed and an apprisal made, and there is still no cost to the property owner unless the owner wants to contest it. Mr. Howe said in that event the owner would have to hire his attorney. The City Manager continued his remarks and said that there are three steps to get the information without spending a penny of the owner's money. Mayor Nee asked what•are some of the value considerations ihat enter into this, and Mr. Howe said that the apprais�r would take the property as it was before the taking of it and appraise it, and appraise it again after the taking> and the difference offered to the property owner. Things such as leases, fences, and so forth are taken into consideration if there are any on the property. ; � I � 108 PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF JULY 19, 1976 PAGE 6 Mr. Bloom remarked that it is possible that you could lose 15 feet of property but in doing so there would be various improvement put in and you could end up with a higher valuation and thus be payiny more. The City Manager replied that unless it can be shown that there is more value to the property, there is no way you could be charged. Tfiat is the law. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked about three of the affected property owners, who had not been heard from tonight. An audience member stated that one of them was on a vacation and another one was too far east to care about the matter. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:12 p.m. Mayor Nee stated that if there were any other comments from citizens they could call any member of the City Council and express their concerns, and these matters will proba6ly come up at the next meeting. The City Manager stated that he wou1d encourage the people to call the Minnesota Highway Department if they needed any detailed information on the plan. NEW BUSINESS: r CONSIDERATION OF COOPERATION AGREEMENT/FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION 1976 PASSENGER WAITING SHELTER PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION CONTRACT N0. 76-35-23-N: 7he Public Works Director stated this was an agreement between the City and the � Metropolitan Transit Corrmission. It outlines the various re•�onsibilities for the +• installation of bus shelters. As per the agreement, MTC will install and provide the shelter, and they will be re9mbursed for the cost of the concrete slab by the City. In anticipation of installing these shelters, money has been budgezed to cover the expenses. There is the item of routine maintenance to be done by the City such as snow- plowing, and the removal of litter. The capacity at these stations is such that the City has to engage in this activity of maintenance. lf there were additional capacity over that now using the sheiters, then a request would go to the MTC to take over tne maintenance. The Public Works Director recommended execution of the agreement. He also said that the break-off point on the maintenance is 40 persons. If less than 40, the City has the maintenance. As far as the snowplowing, we do that anyway, and in talking with the Parks Department they have a crew that goes around the parks on a routine basis and it would be a very little disruption of their activities to include the shelters in their routine activities. ; MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute Contract ; No. 76-35-23-N. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting � aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. iNFORMAL MEETIN6 JULY 20, 1976, WITH GENERAL TELEUISION: Mayor Nee invited the newspapers to the informal meeting tomorrow evening> July 20� 1976, to discuss some questions and to hear some reports from General Television at 7:00 p.m. ADJOURN: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adjourn the public hearing meeting of July 19, 1976. Seconded by Councilman Starwalt. Upon a voice vote, al1 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing meeting of the Fridley �ity Council of July 19> 1976 adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, John Chegwyn William J, Nee Council Secretary Mayor Approved: . � � � � � OFFICI�L NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE TF{E CITY COUNCIL � TO wHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREQY c�iven that there will be a Public Hearing of the � City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on t�londay, July 19, 1976 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P�,M. for the purpose of: � , �J II ' I � To consider an amendment to Chapter 205.101 of the Fridley City Code entitled "USES PERh1ITTEQ in C-1, C--�S, C-2, C-2S Districts." This amendmert wo�ld de]ete Paragra�h B, 5, (bars and taverns7 and add it to Chapter 3, Q, (ba�°s and taverns). The purpose of this amendment is to chanqe bars * and taverns from a"permitted use" in these zoning �' districts to a"permitted use U�ith a Special Use Permit". Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. Publish: June 30, 1976 July 7, 1976 0 WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR � i� �205.092. Uses E uded i. Qwettings or dweiling nits except those enumerafed under Uses Permitted. �2. Any uses which are objectiona because of emission or odor, dust, smoke, gas, vibration, noise, or hazard to property. '3. Dumps, junk yards. 4. Privats lrades, business or industries except any th re onty accessory u or necessari�y incidential fo �permiited uses or as are a pubtic utility or service carrie n under ermit, all as noted in #7 above. 20�.093. Lot Area Requirements �1. Yards, lot areas and widths, lot coverage trailer camps shall be as established b � �approved. � r >pen spaces for dwellings, elling groups, automobile and City Councit in each case where a rmit for any suc� use is 2. Oiherwise, no bui ' g or structure or portion thereof erected in the P District shali be cioser t�a�ny boundary �line of any R-1 - or R-3 District than 20 feet, excepting only sidewalks, curbs and gutters, street p's ements, utility 1' , official traffic direction or regulatory signs or devices, and similar street, traffic and ility a rtenances. �205.10. C-1, C-iS, C-2, C-2S D15TRICT REGULATIONS 205.t0i. Uses Aerm'?!ed �1. Principal Uses � , , � I � A. C-1 Local Business 8� C-1S Local Shopping Local business establishments shall be retail or service establishments which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are furnished. 1) Retail stores and shops and smal! service businesses such as: art shops, professional stud3os; clothing, dr�g, grocery, fruit, meat, �egetable, confectionary, hardware, sporting goods, stationery, music, variety and notion stores, household appliance, fixture and furnishing stores and repair shops in connection therewith; stores and shops for barbers, beauticians, cabinet makers, efectricians jewelers, watchmakers, tacksmiths, painiers, plumbers, shosmakers, tailors, dressmakers, clothes pressers, job printers, blueprinters, photographers. 2) Bakerias, cafes, confectioneries, and ice cream and soft drink, shops, inctuding the preparatian of food products ior retai! sale irom lheir sites only. 3) Liquor stores selling packaged goods.� 4) Radio and television offices and studios, excluding radio or television transmission towers. 5) Theaters, lodges and assembly facilities having a seating capacity of less than 300 persons, but not includinc� outdoor theaters. 6) Olfices, inciuding business and professional. 7) Sale of farm and garden products. 8} Other retail stores and shops, otfices and small service businesses catering to neighborhood patranage, and sirnilar In character to those enume�ated abova, not dangerous or otherwiso detrimentat to zo5.,o, Uaes Excluded Lot Area Requirements C-1, C-1S, C-2, C-2S District Regulations Uses Permitted 205-24 lA persons residing or working in 1he vicinity thereot, or to the public welfare, and not imparing the use, enjoyment or value of any, property, except any uses excluded hereinatter. B. C-2 Generai Business & C-2S Generaf Shopping Business establishments shall be retail or service establishments which deal directly with the custome� for whom the goods or services are furnished. • 1) Orug stores 2) Hardware stores 3) Department stores 4) Bakeries D u'' ` E�—Bars, faverns 6) Household eguipment repair shops •7) Florist shops 8) Commercial recreation 9} Restaurants, excluding "Drive-Ins" 1p) Hotels, motels 11) Theaters, lodges, assembly halls, auditoriums 12) Flospitals, clinics, nursing homes, convalescent homes, homes for the elderty. 13) Olfices, including business and professional 14J Va;ational trade schools 15) Laboratories, medical, dentat and optical, and harmless and inotfensive labora2ories accessory to permitted uses, in the same building. 16) Other retail or wholesale sales or service uses which are similar in charaater to those enumerated above, will not be dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity thereof, or to the public welfare, and will not impair the use, enjoyment or vatue of any property, but not including any uses excluded hereinafter. 2. Accessory Uses A. Business signs. B. Off-street parking facilities. C. Off-Street toading facilities. D. Recreational facilities such as swimming pools and skating rinks, which are available to the public. E. Storage of inerchandise, solely intended to be retailed by a related and established principa( use. F. Telephone booihs. _ G. 8us or taxi loading and unloading iacilities. 3. Permitied Uses With Special Use Permit in C-2 and C-2S Districts A. Bus and taxi terminafs 8. Autornobile agencies selling or displaying new, unused vehicles. C. Boat and marine stores or agencies selling or displaying new, unused boats. D. Garac�es for the storage, repairs and servicinc� ot motor vehicles not over two-ton capacity. 205.101 � X:� 205-25 i � � E. Auotmobtle service statlons. it a Specfal Use Permlt Is granted, the follawing minimum conditlons should be mot In ordor to protoct the �public health, safety, and general weltare. Because ot traltic hazards, nolse, light giare al nic�ht, outdoor storagQ ot merchandise, indiscriminate advertising, and other charactics of this type o( business which are potentially detrimenlal ot our community, theso minimum standards shall be consldered for automobile �ServicQ stations, atong v+ith any other recommenations the City may determine necessary to eliminaie the particular problems in achieving compatability with abutting and adjacent land uses ot each individual request. � 1 1) The Speciat Use Permit for an automobile service station is only tor uses noted in ihe definition, and any additional uses on the premises oiher than those enumerated in the definition require an additional Special Use Permit; examples (but not limited to thesej: Retail sales of non-automobile suppiies, vend'+ng machines outside the building, car or truck rental, trailer sales. 2j The station wili comply vr;th ihe regulations of the zoning district in which it is located, especially parking requirements, landscaping, exterior material and screening. 3) the station will comply vrith the regulations of the sign ordinance and building ordinance. 4) The station will compiy with the licensing requirements of its gas pumps. 5y The station will not provide (or ihe outdoor operation of lubrication equipment, hydraulic lifts or � service piis, or the outdoor dispfay of inerchandise, except for the outside undergrourtd storage ot gasoline and other petroleum products, the display of petroleum products between pumps, or the temporary dispiay of inerchandise �vithin 4 feet of the station building is permitted. � � � � 1 � 6) The sfation or gara�e property shall not be used as a place of storage for or depository of wrecked, abandoned, or junked automobiles, or for the sale or display for sale of used cars. 7j Any required buffer or screening area �vill be so constructed as to obstruct headiight beams of automobiles on the station property from beaming onto adjacent residentia( property. 8) Al) exterior lighting will be so designed, placed and operated as not to be a nuisance to adjacent properties. 9) If the station is to be located in a shopping center or other integrated development, it will be in architectural harmony with the rest ot the center or development. 10} Buiiding used at au:omobile service stations shall be constructed of materials that are compatible with the adjacent area. • 11) Activities Prohibited. a. Eiody work paint�ng and major motor or major transmission repair work shatl be prohibited. b. Vehicular parking is prohibited except that the owners' and employees' automobiles and a maxlmum of three service vehicles may be parked, and automobiles being serviced may be parked tor a maximum Feriod of 46 hours at any one time. ' , F. hlortuar►es �G. Usod Cars N, Automoblto car wASh estaGllshments. �� ; 205.101 205-26 �� . I. Establishments oi the "drivo-in" typo, selling, serving or oftering goods or services directly to customors efther waiting in parked motor vehiclos or to customers who return to tholr vohicles to consume or use tho goods or servicos while on tha promises of the principal use, shall not bo permittod untess specifically authorized by a special use pormit. � J. Creameries, dairies and ice cream plants. K. Shops for tho fotlowing and similar occupations; blacksmtth, machinist, mason, printer, sign painter, tinsmtth. L. !ce plants, cold storage plants, frozen food lockers, M. Laundries N. Trailers, campers, mobile homes, boats, machinery, sporting equipment and like enterprises having its merchandise in the open and not under the cover of a display saiesroom. ; O. Other retail or wholesale saies or service uses which are similar in character to those enumerated above, wiil not be dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity thereof, or to the public weifare, and wili not impair the use, enjoyment or value of any property, but not including any uses excluded hereinafter. P. Animat clinics, veterinaries, dog and cat hospitals provided the fo►lowing conditions are met in order to etiminate excessive noise and odors: ,.1j 7he building shall be of masonry construction, outside wall minimum thickness to be 8", with a :� pPecas2 concrete roof. � 2) The buiiding shali be air condiiioned,all �vindo�vs in the area of the building housing animals shail be double glazed with a fixed sash. 3) Any ventilation system shall be designed so that no odors or organism wiil spread between wards or to ' ihe outside air. � . {'i�r/('S � 7"r4 L E.f'�t/S The above condtions are considered minimum. Additional conditions may be imposed, if necessary, to protect the health, safety and general welfare o( the residents of the City. � 205.102. Uses Excluded � � C I� � II � � 1. C-1 & C-1S Only A. Commercia! recreation uses such as amusement parks, bowling alleys, billiard and pool halls, dance halls and skaiing rinks. B. Taverns, beer gardens or bars serving any alcoholic beverages on the premises. C. Mortuaries D. Used car Iots 2. C-1, C-i S, C-2, C-2S A. Any uso permltted In M-1 or M-2 Distrlcts B. ?�ny uso exc�udod from M-f Dlstricts or trom M-2 Dlstricts. 1D ?05.102 � Uses Excluded 205-2T I� ■ OFF.ICIAL NOTICE CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COU�CIL � TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday, July i9, 1976 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 P.M. for the purpose of: i� Consideration of a vacation request, SAV #76-03, by Robert Schroer, to vacate the street easement on the Southerly 33 feet of the Easter�y 200 feet of Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, i� all lying in the South Half of Section 2, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. '� Generally located at 7700 University Avenue N.E. and adjacent to the service drive. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. Publish: June 30, 1976 July 7, 1976 �� . �I� WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR .2 iPlanning Commission Meeting - June ?3� 1976 � � Pa�o 1� 2 � , Mr. tiergman said he had received some comments i'rom townhouse owners, and their concern seems to be the lack of open par�in� and loss .of some of same with the proposal. ;dr. London said it was.so noted. � 5. RE�UES'P FOR A VP.CATION� SAU �{76-03 BY ROtirRT SC1iR0ER: easement on the Souther��3;3.�e� �f. t.he Lasterly 2U0 2� East Ranch Estates Second Adcition. Mr. Kobert Schroer was present. Vacate the street �i'eet or z�ot 4, Bio�k Mr. t3oardm�.� explained that this request was brought before the Plannin� Commission from the Soecial UsE Permit �ranted to Kennedy Transmission Company, �.nd that Bob Schroer had subr.�i. �ted a requesi; f'or vacation of that street. ?ir. Boardman said Mr. Sc'r.roer had a�ree� t;o the easernent of 50' as requested by the Planning Coinr�ission, and the vacation ti;as i'or the 33' th�;t went through tne transmission company's property. A1r. Harris asked if there taere any lines of any sort in that 33�, and Nr. Boardman replied yes, the city would have to maintain for� sanita:y .se�rer. hi0TI0N by Pe;erson, secanded by Langenield, that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of tne request _for a vacation, SAV �76-03, by Hobert Schroer, to vacate the street easer�eni; on the Southerly 33 feet of the �asterly 200 f'eet o�' l,ot 1�, }31ock 2, East ttanch Estates Second Addition, with the stipulatiot�s f'or drainage and utility easements as outlined by Staf'f. � 1,r. Boaraman said that; it was his understanding that Air. Schroer would eli.minate the proposed street in the rear and all the industrial property will be faced oi"f of Ranchers P�oad. Chairpersan narris said that perhaps at that time they should make a note ar�d tie those split-off lots to the rear lots somehow, as the abandonment of' the road idea �:ould create s�me l�d-locked propert,y. Mr. Boardman said �;hat the city would m3.intain a road easement as long as those lots �aere maintained, and �rith a replat that road would be vacated. 'UPON A VOICE VOT�, all voting aye, the motion carr�ed unanimously. � YOUTH CEnTE.R DISCUSSION � Mi•. Ned Stor a resent representing the Youth Project Committee. i � �J Mr. Boardman said he wanted�� Ro�logize for not �etting this on the agenda. He stated 1ie i,ras going to bring it �o � Planning Commission after it went to alI the member com.-nissions, and it was overlo He added i;hat all the member commissions liave loo}:ed at the proposal and made theiz ecommendations to the Planning Corvnission. • Mr. Lai��;enfcld said he would like to hear f,he motions from the Fium esources Coi:unission and the Community Development Commissions to get updated. ' �, �:i �_ � : <_ , . ! -f ~ _ �Yf.ai1�C��'JC � I � U 1 , � ' ��' � 1 � ;`;; i �;; � ; � i � �; . ;� �Qi O� � ��I �� p�, � �+,, �� u "', z �., : ' ��i ' �1 i �� ,�� ` . ��3 �_1--� __. ��_::�'; �`---?G4 � ( ,� , : ; ; �� { �ir ' � �'1Q� , I ' � � i •, , � , �; � 3 ; �o, �!'� :�i�� , � e , �{ M' Z . � IV � I f ,•i/;11� � J�^�Yei� LuSem£n � 7, 5 � �S �-.. _ _. � i_-----�-�-. r'-�•� '� � /"� ` 5 / 1 ,•, •j, • �� '�- � ° �� \ � �p' lA r �{� i! r�"'_'Y_ 1' 7"f"� i Q. � i5 .a I Y' �,`; �-�_ ,'��, �' l:, a � �,+� / / � t �r%( � %" !� �r��h / ��!~�i� �� 0 . � ,�, �_� ; �-t �,��, . , ��, v � G `` °I ^ + O , . I � I � �i � -,� . � , r �-� � o ;� J �.,r +s ; Ij � � Q I � �� . � �� v . I•f � i � I O i v ld � . � �� ; �0 j�� ' � , t ',�� v c ! � ,. �y ,� ,�. � C : �, ,�� Q � � Qd� � ---' � �° . � � '-s. � s � o L� i � a �� I� � � T � � s �� s � � � �° � ? o —F- � Z s °' j � .d � 3 � , �� ° � i � c .s 1 + , � y � V ! pr 1 � ' � i i � � , �- -...- _ �33.i,o , --:-.�" I � ! I ' loo • � ! i,.- -_. . . � ---+-� I i � �t-� ��-��'�', SAV #J�b-03 RO�ERT SCHROER w�� t��j�E€RI�lG,Ifi�G• Vacate the street easement �� '�.� on the Southerly 33 feet '�� ,� — Er��neers — of the Easterly Z00 feet of �� --svrveyor5 -�t 4, Block 2, East Ranch ___ FS . tet nri A irli i n_-- .-•----�- . �-�R,��li��', IiV�^.RY �li�. iC}�Zl�1t�1AG�. N�.�. ��,la� 2 . _..._.._ .__------,.:�-.--- i � ' I ' ' ' ' ' � � � ' . ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTTON 12.07 OF THL• CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE Tf�e Councirt of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: � SECTION l. For the vacatian of a street easement described as fo11 ows : Aii that part of the Southerly 3.3 fee t of the Easterly 200 feet vf Lot 4, BTock 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, . A11 7Yzng in the South Half of Section 2, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Be and is hereby vacated except that ihe City of Fridley retains easements for drainage and utility purposes over the street easement fierein described and vacated. SECTION 2. The said Vacation has been made in cor�formance with Minnesota Statutues and pursuant�to Section 12007 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. PASSED 8Y THE CITY CQt1NCIL QF iHE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF __ , 1976. ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell Public Hearing: July 19, 1g76 First Reading: Second Reading: Publish........ e MAYQR - WILLIAM J. NEE OPFICIAI. PU�LICATION CITY OF FRIDLEY (EXkfIBIT A) NOTICE OF �iEARIhG ON Ir1PROVEMENTS STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. I975-4 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, b9innesota, has deemed it e:cpedient to receive evidence pertaining to the improvements hereinaiter descxibed. NOiV, THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT on the 19th �ay of July , 197 6 at 7:30 o'clock P.M. the City Council wiil meet at the City Hall in said City, and will at said time and place hear all parties interested in said improvements in whole ox in part. The general nature of the improvements is the construction (in the lands and streets noted below) of the folloiving improvements, ta-wit: CONSTRUCTION ITENi Intersection Improvements, Including Resignalization, Channeli- zation and Safety Improvements on TH 47 at the Intersections of Mississippi Street (C.S.A.H. �f6} and Osborne Road (C.S.A.H. 4�8) ESTIb1ATED COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 615,000 THAT THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR SAID Ib1PROVEI�IENTS IS AS FOLLOjVS: For Construction Item above ----------------------------------------- All of the land abutting upon said streets named above and alI lands within, adjacent and abutting thereto. All of said land to be assessed propor�ionately accoxding to the be�efits received by such improvement. That should the Council proceed �aith said improvements they will consider each separate impxovements, except as hereafter. other�aise provided by the Council al1 uiider the following authority, to-wit: r4innesota Statutes 19b1, Chapter 429 and la��s amendatory thereof, and in conformity �vith thz City Charter. DATED THIS 21st DAY QF June � � , Publish: � July 7, 1976 Jul�� 14, 1976 1976 , BY QRDF.R OF TI-]E CITY C011�CIL. MAYOR - William , ee 3 � ❑ � 3A CITY OF FRIDLEY M E MO RA PJ D U M T0: NASIt�I M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY CQUNCIL FRO(�I: MF+RIIIN C. BRUt�SELL, ASST. CITY MGR./FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: PRELININARY ASSESSME�tT ROLL FOR STREET IP�1PR011EN1ENT PROJECT ST. 1975-4 DATE: JULY 14, 1976 Irr�rovement Project ST, 1975-�4 includes proposed work on Osborne Road,from 5th Street to 170 feet west of"Commerce Lane. The work to be done is the installation of concrete cur6, gutter, sidewalk, street surfacing and signals. There is also work to be done at the intersection of ��lississippi Street � and University Avenue under this improvement project. The nature of this work is vridening of the inters�ection to provide turning lanes and signal work. Attached is the Preliminary Assessment Roll for the improvement project. The total cost of the iroprovement is as follows: Fede ral Government's Share $461,337.50 Minnesota Highway Department's Share 12,480.00 Anoka County's Share 25,012.50 City`� Share 52,520.00 TOTAL $551,350.00 The City's share of the improvement is made up of the following components: Signals $3,145.00 (To be paid from the General Fund) I, Mississippi Street Intersection $8,780.00 (To be p.aid from the State Aid Fund) To be assessed $40,615.00 �, Tne �resent plan is to assess only the Osborne Road section of the improvement. The estimated front foot assessment for industrial and commercial properties would be 516.22 per foot and $1.52 per foot for side yard assessments. The ' assessment rate for resi denti al properti es woul d be $3.02 per foot. There is I no side yard as.sessment on residential properties. The assessment f or residential properties involves only the cost of sidewalk, curb and gutter, Industrial and commercial properties will be assessed for additional costs. I � MCB : s h ' � . .� ,— . ,.wr.�.� _..�..�..,..�..�_�..._.,..�... �. �,..A.�.. .�. �. , I ' � � i i ' I � I HIGHWAY 47 , ' COMBINED HEARING HANDOUT FOR TRUNK I I ' S.P. 0207-44 (T.H. 47=156) . Minn.Proj. M5425 O at Mississippi St. ' ' ' Minn.Proj. M5425 ( ) at Osborne .. At the Intersec�ion of T.H. 47 and Mississippi 5t. �' (CBAH 6) and Osborne P.d. (CSA�� 8) in Fridley. ' ChanneZization, Signal :'.evisior.�, ;' Biks Lanes and Sidewal;c Construction ,' In City of Fridley, Anoka County ' HE.c�RING CONDUCTED BY CITY OF FRIDLEY IN COOPERATION ' WITH THE I�IINNESOTA HIGH�9AY DEPARTMENT: ' HEARING HELD AT FRIDLEY CIVIC �ENTER on July 19, 1976 ' 7:30 P.M. . ' - i ' i ' . ' I � ' I ' . ' .. \ � �- -� ,�. ,; %... � .� � - - k� ' ,, .� . � ��..'' . - '° ' + � �, ' �`'� F � ��., .. . � , � �. "�'.... y � � � � . °t�, ' �_.f �} i -� I ' � _ ' _ � � � � ti � ��t.. , �� >,�,.-_4 �k.. �'�_ � � . �� ` �'w. ,��\ � � !, ''+�.`i/� .�. C} � � t . �.- ��' � a: F �; f�"' ,� r`s��f�ll�F:'; �; . �'� . . . _ A . ='a 'F . .l>�", lC�� . - �� , t •�: t. , . _.,�:� � , � w , t ,. . ' � � k ��. � ,, '� � �, .. �- r Y _ .. � � (� r 4� � ', y--�i 7- . �, ;� : !. I 2.}'Vi . �i5�':A- � t.�..J �i �L�t',� t� ?, �� ' r' � , . �n �� \ i JF.k i, ,C)S �l � "^� � F a, �.,.- ,. ,., ._, _ x � �� a �-' i� : , �s � � i e � ! �. � � �" � y.� �� } � i �� R � � i�.� ' e ::' � r i � ?yi, A. t .. . . . y � , Ali" . y p-. r \ . � �i'Q,'•n p. � . . � S ''; f � � � } � � � ' . �,�F �� ' `I 1 �1 � ' k � < � �.r � e,,, .� � A z � � n g s � ,�� I � �„ �1 k' �i � � xL..�,.�, ,a..... ,..«, <.� �.-�. . _ s. e..,» a,.<r.� � ' � _ � �:.; �. `t ��n � � ,;�- h., � ; + d��;_L ��.-��.R;', , � _,f . �.�'%jf, ' i ,1 ; j� E�:' ` � 3 -" �. i' -� e ��r �" � � �� _ �.: � �.. � �� `'a S � � i � > y,� �� ' � �. S �`: � �� J �� "�.,``l A��., f J � � �� ,�¢ `'' c '�� ,>.� j��c �� k.. � �,, ,. , .J t t. '3. � 1, S P _ , I! �� ! � � � y � F.: ; � , � ii <--� '� � , � � -�-; , � ;, � � � t� r .� !�_E. _�� ' Q � � _ _ 1, ! r � , 41 I Y� .. � �:' � " ) .k .�.�, - - � v � � , � _ _, t , � � �, -- -- t.. G , I _ � � c :.,. t.'.'. -� �� I ` �i � . .. . '��i : `� �' a � � ' .� 'f` � : � i. . b -,�; ,i � . 71 4r r'f� a,t.� .F , � � 'S' T � �, .. l '� Fi.c�.i..�C7�tl�A � 4 i \� � � '�4� b" C! �G ,'�� J ?i,'Y.2ii.5 � +'F}`� t Ja �� +� !, d @{ F., �. 1ta > r+. j� E `1� `'. .i�� € 4 �I, . ��i � n �� • � . � . 'n..,. =�� \� �i �S . li �A �—� _ . . �,� I { o-. . �� r y � � ?� s � �� c �� _ '-> � � . ; ) . a � r . k `� :_�� . �s•� �... �.�c . \�k l-% +� �+ � i k-�: C.�S� i n�i S' � . �. ��`:., �- � . ; � � n i'' � �' � � ., �k� � _ 'C - $ -�,- t, � i �� , . 4 \1 � � : •..s! � _ y� _;n �� ig y f �° . — � '�i�� 1 .' � � � �, � a �.': '! : 1 �gpgi . �'��1 � a. � �'r� #.'. .�� ` � L � „ � - � :� � . �V 1.' 1 '�. � � = j F e �� 1�`Jti t 'i, ! ��". � �' , r.4 \ " . i �t` *'v 3 i r c u '; 1� '� � y t � 1 „ y \ x \� t} t `e f i �i i r ,� ._. ,'� � d � � �,� (\, l � . � � �� > > �3d� ��k � �.t >, r� . �. j ;.f F� � . ......... � � _ �7r` J eE. i: �� t '�` �k 1, k i�- s ��ggg ;-r� �� i � r � R x. �� , _� . _ � �;f�c � �� i r ... . .. _ � �� - � � , r a � �� ,� � � � �� + , l .. .. . I F .. ' y •1 .`� \ .:- 3 a i�!C ,( . _ . .- .' ^ .. t' . �� . i 1)�..�� V ._ ..ama�.ca.u.w_�.�a '}:r.<. � . s �. q� � ., 4 � � �: K ! � 5. i '4 EJ�� i. � � -• '�� °' .�w,1 .� l t �4jv+/ �y - , Pv' .� ' � , , r F _ : ,� � •,� � e, .°�� . � l� �:: t � � � L.., �„� � y,G yT, SL `�. � t fi ,�� i ti7� r: { ' .` t_ r � £�"�; ;7 � F � .� 4 , � _ � . � �( � , :� �,`�, � .�_7 ° ,. 1..�.;�. ':�." ��tt �_� re� . r. �. . ., ^ c t p - ..'.i *s i . �. „ . _. : _ ' _ . . , r �� ' ..� r ,._ F t � .. . _ � / {.. � � a� 1 F� ��'� z� y r �- a r � �� i � �n:xrr _»�.� < .... ..� > . ^ .-.. < � " � � �i '`.� s ._. ` (f c `�:r 1. �: . . �� a . ��'` i � L�� l .... .......... .... .lk �. s •. y, dc tk� z�f . � 1: \ .' � \ a - F : �G J 4 . . L �\ ,� � � � \ - '"' _ � \ < � � ,; ` r, e ' �'` �` i � ` 4 i t x . � `� � � ' _ i'�� A t ',.� � w � � y. � `;� r fi � � � > > S �� y � � i r �� a�. � p" } 7. Y � r 1 a i �z x �- ir _z�, � e [ � .�� i �x �..'t,�. '^�i � S `�f I < �$ e t � P `S�� , f f : ... -._. " _ y � ti��. `., , , [ � ., �.t � f, yh ; ` ^ � � 1 � .q ii C,:'i;1 � ,a � < 1 � � � �i � t � � / I � ` ' b . ' ��'R. .._�l i i �,� � I �'^ � : 1 � , � �' � E �+, �� ' =-=-_ �� ' ` 1� � �J � �..'�. �l i ��`i E � -.sw s. � -..:_:rsa ,�� '� :. �t� . , � � < , ! t i i � � L.! ,..l. , <. � : _ -� - � ' � � f c. t � � •.;.� �._ r v � �' `I t ' � . � ��t �.' 1 � e , ] n� � � � ��. ra. � I '� �♦ � I .._ , � � l. � � � � � Y � � � �'�. .. -7 . . . . _: . �l { 4 .,. .. ,..,'1 , ; � . , 4 "a. I di it4 x e ` . .' . 1 ' ,' ,�, ' . f. y i k -F ' �. f d y��`�y �V . . ' _ ._ _.. ., !t . ,t4 ,. � C . fi � k n �.. n T T'� . .�. i .� �.�� . .., �� . � t. .-. r 4 .'.' � pli � . � �.i $ � es ,-.} i � , � � � g � . � � L.. 1 e� ... / �.1 �� ,C.F.�l..�')� C , �. x r � � * � ��} � �1 r t • b c ; - -� � � L > + r t � , �-" � � � �� ,.� . ! t � � � . � 1 i I +,� a . i � ,�,r � s ,.. ��.. . _ �� f d - � f � � i f ait E' t f r _ �\ � � �'-?'�� ; � �� °JP.51 4 `t.,� r -`'� p �� \ .- .. 1 1 : 1� E i 1 F t`, i� � ��1 �\ �'. P :S 1 .+ � � _,� y , �.�- � 1, � , � r � : � � i : _ f �r � �� 5 � e � `� <�i-' � �' ,-._ -:.>- � �� j ��,,,. . ��e. ��s t. . 3 i, i .< u f' E� �. 3 �✓ .�` "P. (�....� i ti j? 4r;� �� .' iv � � r -'. � �.1 �.� • � � Fr i 'L ht � f��4� :' . � �(�.,tr �"'� s �� } '4.�.. ..1. . ti� \\ -� �f �3 r �i � .t�- c"�� f :�, � k@ � �� r, [ .t�.� , x �'d Rl 4'�� w�„ < ,�, \\ , � � � � � , �� . � ;� r � �� r<<,,ar .�p „ � �i � � �� . .��;�E � �{ � s<� [1 i �� i c � �� a � � � a. a _ & ' ,' �r t > � J �tv � � ( ,/�� 7 � � �'a � :i - � +� �� ... /�`...ti. :�. � a ! !�l� '� t �. (�'G, �; �'• `�� i°;� -�' �J' T. , � __. � .� .. ... . . . ' _ ' " K Lt. � z. ..� . - 3 ;� I ... � y � � < <� i � G _, ,� r a € "--� 11 ' ,i s � , 1_i ��r-L. ,. ,. �, . � „ ."� ..,;- ...: � .:<. L.. . � tia �, .., ri ,,�. •�" s �� '..1 � � � a._ i .t�� _.� 1 �. . �, ,�,i � �> � t , �� • .� ,�, _ � �i� �� '- iY� .>.�.n,�� `� � � � . , -.--, , _, � �, � , . t � � ` � � - � . ,. � � �. 9 �° r . � � � � � � t J � � ,.� �. ,.�, �? „`i 6 . ,_'il V .� � I. t � f �i- 4� � -. � � r z i : � ,.�;o.K.r.*.-' ��,f` '� � . . ', �, � . : J ' , � � F(7r. ��,il'3 ..nF'� _ �� e .` r � �. �� ..��'� ��, �-�� c - � li. I �' ��k� V`_/ �.� �t � \ �� J e.,,� � ' t � � � f- @ n c . . ° i . � m � � � � ,� 1 � 3 � I7 t 1 � L t�: �`c� L-- � ; f � ' % . � �. '• � �< .�. . ; � ` ! � _ � °'-yl ',. 1r�' � n, F P � d �' � �F �5 & � s � ��''r� A'�;/ � i �'i@ � � ; :.. � x *r �__ •4 ,. ��'' -� -= a `� - � p!,. :w .s� _ ,t,` l: l' t � R � o �. �-" b` ��am-n: :a''�� .� � ' � � � �: I� �� d � " � � � ' � T � 1 F " r s - t p t^ . ! ,� ` Y� i ,�,z° M aA6� s.�� ,-�- r , �� t �� -�. �'i�. ��i� 3_3vI��n � �eP� �-. �O d i �l r�� _ ��,..� t� ,x k: ) i E�, �. � ,.k rC,P l; 5C �� .a�'F �'��'_��,� �� , � 4�` , � i ,�, y ' � tl b ( i 4 _ 4 w � .. . ��.: � ' ..' ��. .,, r ,. �,. �� s � I�:. . r �'•' � � j,, � � � � �e Y h� a\ ¢ 3_ � . y� J � � � :: �., i E �' i s s� t� � ( c4� 7� � _ s4 � . t ,,� t: ,�t' 1 .� �1 j Y� � f.c� � ) ;�< A4� '' . . .. \ .... e. . ... ( . . �' k - l� Y . iJ 1 -�.- k ,��.� t '� x ... .. -.. tl ', �' yl � � ' ��4 .�� ..� . i iroF� = / f��l�>l')� ,. -a„ ` ��t � i� � ` �� ,v � ��i � � � � �� .. � z � , � � � 5 ! . .�i�� i��. I . �� - !I 1;� � 1� �i� �` tl � t..n , � � 1 _ __ „, � � , -� , � � � � . __ _ __ , `i 1 � � . A� � � r � � (, �, j i ` (�' F c. • - y � k '� e � ; J� f ' �tt 3 � _--- � {i �#.. _'r' ,' � a :� � � ._. � � p r `� � � � � �.. a< .,� a _ ._tJ � � ._ � �l ( } 4p ( .�, `j ( v. N ` '4, ^' h., _, .. %, ' � � � ' ' . i � �' � 4 F� �� 11 j � Y i ' !•4'tl4 i � � . f i'f � J 1 ' � � , �� I � � � , � i i t .. ^ � ''t: �,, c I t � / , �, ��.'� ,� . ( � ,� .d s � r I �� y � �� ' �; �¢ p �� =y� nr [ . { � �� ... •. _ ;; .. , ..... . 5 ; � } r �. � � _ � � ; �. �. } � ��, � � _ � �� / 1- . � � ._„ �. ' es, � �!_�s' i e`� } � ; �'^ "i � `. � i�� is�. �°�� .. � _ � _, 1 Y�. :p? � � 9i� � ✓��''� � . a y''>> - � � ! � S � . �. a � kJ.] ;ljl � I,� 6 ;�' ra AR ��,-�'g I i :f T �Y ,! d� � � f,Iti;t<II .+a':.•; A-::.�$ � 0 ' It is the inter.t and desire of the City af Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota ' Highway Department, and the Federal Highway Administration ta provide a means through which all i.nterested parties may have an opporttznity to be ' fully infonned of proposed highway location and desi.gr� features, effeets to adjacent land owners; the economic, social, and environmental impacts ' to the community. Also to obtain commen�s from the �ffected individuals ' and agencies involving the design criteria. The combined public hearing procedure is in accardance with Ti�cle 23, Section 128, of United States ' Code and as recommended by the Federal Highway Arl�ninistration Policy and Procedure Memorandum 20-8�which was issued to insure "that highway loca- ' tions and designs reflect and are consistent with Federal, State, and ' local goals and objectives ... and ... provid.e.a medium of free and open discussion and to encourage early and amicable resc�Iutions of contro- ' versial issues that ma.y arise." ' The work propased at Mississzppi 5treet (see attached layout) includes right turn lanes on i�tississippi Stre�t, bus stops on T.H. �, bike lanes along ' C.S.A.H. 6, and revision of the inplace signaZ system to conform with the manaal on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Total construction cost of the ' , � work at Mississippi is expected to be $74,425. It is anticipated that the , total project will qualify for High Hazard Safety funds (H.H.S.) from the Federal Highway Ad�inistration and a breakdar�m of the participation in con- �� ' struction cost is as follows: ' FHWA - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - - - - - - $66,982 NffID -------------- �,473 ' City and County - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 , 970 Total Cost of Project 574,425 I ' ' ' It will be necessaxy to acquire small amoun�5 of right-of-way in the north- east and southeast quandrants. This right-of-way will be acquired by Anoka County. The work proposed at Osborne Road includes ehannelization on Osborne Road, bike lanes and sidewalks, bus stops on T�.H. 47 and revision of the inplace signal system to conform with the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. There are two alternates proposed at Osborne Road (see attached layouts). It is anticipated that the total.pro�ect will qualify for H.H.S. funds from the FHWA and a breakdown of the cost of each alternate is as follows: Alternate 1 FHtr7A-------------`----- $302,0$5 NIHD ---------------•---- 6,510 City and County - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27,055 Total Cost of Alternate 1 $335,650 Alternate 2 FHWA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $168, 005 NgID ------------------- 4,430 City and County - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14,245 . Total Cost of Alternate ]. $186,680 The main difference in construction cost for these two alternates is that Alternate 1 would be located over the inplace St. Paul water main. The necessary protection to construct over the water main is estimated to cost $158,000. Alternate 2 would shift Osborne Road to the south so that the roadway con- struction is not placed over the water main. However, this alternate.would xequire acquisition of right-of-w�y along the south side of Osborne Road. This right-of-way would be acquir.ed by the City of Fridley and/or Anoka County. ' �� / � �., . �� / i�/' • , EAST OF TH 4?fFA;iN3 WESTI �3' w` a' ' � �' '4� � --------,� ar�o K tM1i'l ef�E WATEA M.vN ,.,...:. ._.._ .. ... ' Rr .. . . .•� : '. . . � � . . . .:,�. . . � TERNATE � �3 0 �� V�� 1 �i Vt"�ir► , ' , ' .. _ _ ' '» ' ' , �-- � / ` � /� � , �- , �` / ,�/ �� / � � ' ` .' • ' . �' ' . � � �'� � � N ALTCRNATE L ...._. — � �a'a �� t 1 _ ' � ll �� '�J ?�J ,, 1' i ��0 35p ❑ � �� i � ---� _.1_ --� _ i �-------- � -- I '--�--,�, � — OS�Al:tvF R�U__._._, - � _-_ _ , , � , � f-' I Vl � � � 'n I _:.�� t)F 7H 47 (F:+�� , W� :T 1 µ 14 ^? � 4� �� -.�1.. �' 14' � � � � , — BKE+NGY � — B�UI� ��D tNF'LACE W+�TEit M41N �— ; �i(1C1NALk r �: . .. _ ._ T_. _ - __ _. _____��.... _.__•_ -- °- - ----• -' - -• -- •_.. .. -...--- . � 5 1 1 i � � �� osso�r� �►a � ; "SUBMISSION OF MATERIAL FOR THE OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT" An official transcript will be made of this hearing. Persons,wishing to submit a written statement or other inforr.►ation instead of, or in addition to, oral statements at tonight's hearing may do so by submitting material to: 1Kr. W. M. Crawford District Engineer Minnesota Hi.ghway Department 2Q55 North Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 0 This may b� done for a period of ten days following the heaxing. AlI material submitted will be included in the official transcript of this hearing. All correspondence submi�ted must be postmarked no later than July 30, 1976. AVAILABLE INFORMATION FOR PUBT�IC VIE4r'ING Within two months after the hearing, a copg of the transcript wi11 be sub- lnitted to tne Division Engineer of the Fedaral Highway Administration. All information devaloped in support of the proposed project wi11 be acailable upon request for public inspection and copying at the Golden Valley Uistrict Aeadquarters prior to any decisions on appzoval by the Federal Highway Administration. Also, copies af, or reference to, or photographs of each• statement or e�ibit used or filed in connection with this public hearing will be available for public �nspection and copying not later than the date the transcript is subinitted to the Division Engineer. Copies of, or reference to, all information made available to the public prior to the hearing can also be viewed at the: Golden Valley District Five Headquarters Minnesota Hic�hway Department 2055 North Lilac L�rive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 � RIGHT OF 4�'AY �CQUISIT�ON Nece�sary right-of-way for these impraven�.�nts wi.11 be acquired by the City of Fridley and/or Anoka Courity. The x.ight-af-way will be acquired in accordance with tne 1970 t3niform Relncation Assistance and Real Property - Acquisition Polici.es Act�passed by Corlgress, and the I97]. State Relocation Assistance La�a� Riqh�-af-way acquisition wzll not begin until we have re- ceived Design Approva� fxom the Federal �-Tighway Admin�..stration. It is expected that we will request Design Approval frnm the F.H.W.A. approxi- mately t��o months after the hearir.g. a II� �� 1 D�EMO T0: � , , t�MO FROM: 1)ATE ;SUBJECT: Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager Richard N. Sobiech, Public lYorks Director July 15, 1976 Passenger Waiting Shelter Cooperation Agreement with Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) Attached please find a passenger waiting shelter cooperation agree- � ment drafted by the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC). The agreement stipulates City o£ Fridley and M'I'C responsibility per- taining to installation and future maintenance of the shelters. � � , Installation wi1Z be performed by the MTC with reimbursement of site preparation costs by the City. Please note that in antici- pation of the installation of the shelters, monies were provided in the 1976 budget. Routine maintenance of the facility after installation will be performed by the City. The hiTC approved three more locations in addition to those noted in � the agreement. However, due to the following circumstances, they have been deleted from the 197b groject but are to be installed with a future project: �J I�' 1. Central Avenue and 53rd Avenue NE: shelter installation to be coordinated with roadways improve- ment scheduled fox Central Avenue. 2. Hayes Street and 73rd Avenue NE: shelter installation would require MTC to obtain a site agreement with adjacent property owner who has de- clined to sign the agreement. The City is working with MTC to locate another similar site in the same area. 3. Mississippi Street and TH 65: The Minnesota Highway Department (Nd-ID) noted problems with the site selection since installation of a shelter would be close to the travel2ed highway and be in conflict with the existing drainage ditch section. MTC and MHD are in process of resolving the problem, but a solution would not b� arranged prior .to the shelter project. �, It is recommended that the City Council consider execution of the agreement at the meeting of July 19, 1976. RNS/jm 4 �� 'f ' � � ' � � ' ' ' � � , �� ►�� PASSEIIGER WAITING SHELTER COOPERATION AGi2EEMEYJT FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION bP1C Contract No. 76-35-23-N Site No. C-341-2, 342, 343, 435, 437-2, 440 THZS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , • by and between tne CITY OF FRIDLEY, a municipa]. Corporation of the State of 29innesota, (nereinafter referred to as "CITY"), and the NIETROPOLITAN TRANSIT AREA, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, acting by and through its governing body, the R4.ETROPOLITAN TRANSIT CONI:�iISSION (hereinafter referred to as "MTC"); WITNESSETH: WH�,REAS, MTC, pursuant to authority provided in P-iinnesota Statutes, Section 473A.06, Subdivision 5, is empowered to use public streets and right-of-way for the purpose of erecting passenger waiting shelters; and P7HEREAS, the parties on October 1, 1973, entered into an agreement for the installation, operation and maintenan�e of passenger waiting shelters; and WHEREAS, the CITY recognizes the benefits to be afforded its citizens thereby and thus wishes to cooperate in so establishing passenger waiting shelters. NOW, TI-�REFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. MTC'S OBLIGATION. The HITC shall make all necessary site improvements for six (6) passenger waiting shelters. The locations and descriptions of which may be found as Exhibit A to this Agreement. The Dfii`C shall provide a11 necessary shelter site improvements, to include but not limited to, concrete base, electrical service to the site and site res�.oration, as set forth in Exhibit A of this Agreement. The MTC shall furnish and install Type C or D passenger waiting shelters at locations identified in Exhibit A of this Agreement as part of its next passenger waiting shelter program. Said shelters shall include lights, electrical accessories, benches and skirts, as set forth in Exhibit A of this Agreement. II� . III ' -2- The six (6) shelters shall remain the property of the 2�ITC. The P�1TC shall indemnify, defend, and save harmless the CITY from any and all claims by or on behalf of any person or persons for personal injuries, wronqful death or property damages arising out of �he performance of these construction activities, or any act or occurrence committed in or arising from the use of premises for passenger waiting��shelter purposes, except such claims arising from the negligence of the CITY. 2. CITX'S OBLIGATION. The CITY sha11 perform routine naintenance '(litter pickup, snow shoveling, window cleaning, etc.), if so sta�ed on Exhibit A to this Agreement. Upon completion of the work at each site and upon a bi].ling ,' by the MTC, the CITY shall reimburse the MTC for the actual cost of the site improvements (concrete base) up to but not to exceed six hundred ', dollars ($600.00) per site for each Type C shelter installed. 3.- hiODIFICATIONS OF AGREEP-iENT, This Agreement may be modified only upon prior written approval of the MTC and the CITY. 4. Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Passenger Waiting Shelter Permit Agreement of October 1, 1973, between the CITY and riTC shall apply. 5. It is agreed that neither party relinquishes or waives any of the responsibilities or power imposed upon it by law or regulation by the execution of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEROF, the partie5 hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized zepresentatives as of the day first above written. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AREA by CITX OF FRTDLEY and through the Metropolitan Transit Commission BY Camille D. Andre, Chiet Administrator and BY li ' Harry W. Springer, General Manager I � BY I ts BY i ts ^ � � � a a x :a � a a � � z N 4 e-I � 3 x a z a � � a a � r � .-1 �n � � � v �ro a�n� a w° �� •.�i °° � i •� �c �.°� : v y � U C U N N U N� N O O� H•�-1 >.-� N tT '-I N.i� � PC N`� W O U W�F0, .-i N ' ,k N N N 3� N..0 G� f1 . la �.+ • el O•.i �0 tn q•.� � .r�i � +� O � 'C Lt U � W G� N-� •�I �••i � O N R N OG � U�-1 w 3�0 w� �0 N 0 0 �-°�+ .-vi .-�i �-�i � � r+ a3 U U U U U U o � U 3 � � dE � � � � � t� u id� b+ b� d+ �U+ a+ b� �n G� � a a a a a a m �� z° z z z z° z o' P9 � z° z° z° z° z° z° ��a w � �� z �� z z z° z z° z z M w a� � �t N H � � M i w �c a Q fZ N N O O O O O O U W U N U U U U U U C q >+ � O W � U a z 0 i-+ H a � �+ w � u °� E z � y H U U U U U U U N a e+ H 3a H � tt1 Vl N t11 CO OD x ►+ x o W U � � � � � � � a� a� a� a°a�i `�� z o � a�i s� ro �, a�i s� � b�w >� ; -.��a >� �� >� '�.w a� t6 Ip .i � Vi .i C � N .-i � U 3a .0 PG O fa 1� P4 O d tn rtf a O N+� N � N N � U•r1 1� '� -.�i u^i u�i ro a� �i •.� 2s uN, a+� � ca W W a W W f+� O� U� N d N �-1 'd Rf 't� U � � w NS W � ft r1 N M i} 01 M M M N .�i ro .,� N [v � d '� .� [v � .C-{1 � W t0 � d1 rl 01 4) � 4C ❑