03/15/1976 - 00014866�
�
�
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF MARCH 15, 1976
The regular meetiny of the Fridley City Counc�l of March 15, 1976 was called to order
by Mayor Nee at 7.32 P M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
Mayor Nee welcomed the aud�ence and invited them to �o�n with the Counc�l �n saying
the Pledge of Allegiance to the F7ag.
ROLL CALL�
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
PROCLAMATION
Councilwoman Kukowski, Counc�lman Starwalt, Mayor Nee,
Councilman Hamer m k and Councilman Fitzpatrick
None
P4ayor Nee stated that March has been designated as Red Gross Month in Fridley Those
who have been here for a number of years know the Red Cross has been �nstrumental in
the flood of 1965 in assisting the C�ty in its need and also in the tornadoes of
1965. They have been tnstrumental in the operation of blood banks, and they are
presently becom�ng more active in Fridley In view of the support they have given
to Fridley he thought it appropriate that the prociamation be gtven. Mayor Nee
read the proclamat�on.
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski, seconded by Councilman Hamernik, to adopt the agenda
as presented. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, vISITORS
Mayor PJee stated that the Council sets a period of time for people to comment on
inatt�rs on the agenda, whether it be queries, explanations, or critic�sms, and the
public has an opportunity to speak at this time.
No one responded to the Mayor's call in this matter.
OL� BUSINESS:
4TION OF SPEC
.E. TABLED 2
SP
The Public Works �irector, Mr•. Dick Sobiech, stated that this �s a petition or
request to allow an outside d�splay and the sale of mobile homes at the Hol�day
Village Shopping Center site at 47th Avenue and University. The site �s in the
southwest corner of the Holiday Village property This matter had been tabled to
allow additional input in some specific areas, and he would like to proceed on
these.
One of the �nitial items of concern was the traffic movement in �d out of the area
The Public Works Director then called attention to the letter wr�tten P4arch 10, 1976,
where Mr. 8eckler has outlined his intentions and agreements on the special use
permit request. Item Number 5 in h�s letter concerns the movement of the mobile
units on and off the lot between 8:30 and 11 30 A.M. and a spec�al permit would be
required by the Highway Department which would review the routes and would approve
or d�sapprove of routing depending on the access or the easy flow of traffic. The
flow would be on University Avenue to 57th Avenue and to the westerly entrance of
the Hol�day Center property and then to the area reyuested for the special use permit
Another item of concern was the landscaping. The Pu61ic Works Director stated that
the staff had been working with Mr. Beckler to come up with landscaping plans that
would be an improvement on the existing stte A proposal is to have ten um ts
displayed in con�unction with an office structure. These would be surrounded by
sodding, some trees and bushes He said a permanent s�tuation in this regard would
be desirable. Railroad ties and trees and sodd�ng would be �ncorporated to make
the green areas and additional landscaping would be incorporated around the laight
poles in the area.
REGULAR P1EETING OF MARCH 15, 1976
PAGE 2
Another� item of concern was the sign. The pet�t�oner can meet a71 the requ�rements
of the s7gn code by the �nstallation of a wall sign placed on the office structure.
The staff, however, felt it might not look the best, and the staff would propose a
free standing sign, however, this Would require a variance because only one is
permitted per frontage and there is one at the intersection of Main and I.694
A final consideration and concern was the parking area. The area was scaled and
from that it was determ�ned that from the ex�sting code approximately 1,045 stalls
would be requ�red. At present there are about 1,109 which �s more than adequate
at the present time, but with the tnstallation of a mobile home s�te th�s quantity
would be reduced by 94, mak�ng a defi cit of 30 spaces Some of the deficit
coultl be made up by some parking along the easterly and westerly extremtties of
the site, thus reducing the defictt to approximately ten stalls. The Public
Works Director cautioned that the number of stalls required is only an estimate-
and whether a deficit extsts only time will tell. Mr. Beckler stated that the
sign would be less than 50 square feet The plans are for one 12'x4', which is
less than the maximum the code specif�ed. Mr. Beckler said the s�gn was for people
as they appr�oached the sales area. They were not attempting to show it to anybody
on I.694. The Public Works Director said that if a parking problem developed, some
of the units could be shifted around and Mr Beckler has agreed if the parking was
a problem he would revise the layout to come up w�th the additional space.
Councilman Fttzpatrick asked if the nursery area would be a parking area. The
Publ7c Works Director said it would not be.
Councilwoman Kukowski asked Mr. Beckler asked about the movement of the trailers.
Mr. Beckler said he would abide with the stipulation for certain hours. He said
that although h�s letter said between 8.30 and 11.30 A.M., he figured the movements
would be between 9.00 and 11.00 A.M. He was giving himself a half an hour leeway
in case a problem arose
Counctlwoman Kukowski asked if it would be feasibie to grant the perm�t wtth an
annual review. Mr Beckler replied that as long as he was be�ng treated fa�rly
and as long as he was running the operation, he would have no dtsagreement with
�t, and he would agree to th�s st�pulation.
Councilman Fitzpatr�ck stated that he felt the request is coming from the wrong
angle. Logically the request should come from Holiday Vtllage to have the outdoor
concession of some kind, and the Holiday representative is not present. He said
the question had been ra�sed to the City Attorney about the s�tuation in terms
of two bus�ness on a s�ngle piece of property. He said we are trytng to do two
things in that we are saying we don't have two, we have one that is a concess�on
and yet the 6usiness is not the one mak�ng the request. The City Attorney said
that may be true, but he noted in Mr. Beckler's letter that the applicant �s
agreeable that the permit be issued to Holiday. The City Attorney said that in
h�s opinion, if the Counc�l grants the permit, it should be granted to Holiday
Uillage and they could sub-lease, but the property owner is the one responsible
to the City for the promises that have been made for the spec�al use permtt, and
the City should look to them for recourse if there is any 6reach of agreement.
He was not able to find any stated restrictions in our ordtnances or in the statues
about two businesses on one piece of property, and he supposes the question is
at least partially removed in the even the permit is issued to Holiday V�llage.
Councilman Fitzpatrick sa�d that we are mov�ng awfully fast here. We �ust rezoned
the property to bring it �nto conform�ty with the use, and now we have a request
for a non-conformity w�th the next zoning There are some cleanup stipulations
we haven't had the time to observe one way or the other at the present t�me.
Mayor Nee said that on the question of various businesses occupying the same site,
almost any shopping center has the same situation.
Councilman Hamernik asked about setting a precedent for other areas. The question
he has is how str�ct is the ordinance on parking. Is this the only means of
control that we have on parking Anyone can apply for a special use permit to
put in a concession
The C�ty Attorney replied that assuming it �s properly zoned, �f they met w�th every
requirement for screening, it would be correct. In regard to the Mayor's quest�on
on excess space that is not legally used for a bus�ness presently there, he said
that the She7don Mortenson Shopp�ng Center on the corner of Central Avenue and
the freeway has from time to ttme !�ad a number of businesses put on the property,
such as, Howard Johnson, Twin City Federal, and perhaps a car wash in the back
�
�
�
�
�
�
REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 15, 1976
^N
PAGE 3
area, and he assumed the same criteria applied Where there was sufficient space
the permit was granted It is true that those businesses are somewhat different in
that they have a permanent structure and do not necessarily have outs�de storage
It becomes a question of zon�ng and sufficiency of space
Councilman Starwalt mentioned the cleanup aspect and said he would like that pursued
further. Mr Beckler stated that he would be the responsible person �n the matter
of cleanup in the back area. Mr 6eckler said that the permit could be issued �n his
name since he would be running the operation Councilman Fitzpatrick comrnented that
he thoughtthe whole thing should be coming from Holiday.
The City Attorney sa7d that if the Council is not pleased with the outcome of this,
he thought the proper remedy would 6e to take a look at the zoning code and see what
is perm�tted in the commercial zones and perhaps the staff could give some thought
to whether this is a proper use within this type of zoning The Public Works Director
stated there �s a performance bond on the property The C�ty Manager said that if
the Council is inclrned to do so they could issue a special use permi� and add
stipulations to it.
In response to a question the City Attorney said that the reason you have special use
permits is 6ecause w�thin certa�n classifications of zoning there are some uses that
normally would be permitted, but because of the character of the use, or because of
other surround�ng conditions, it may not be appropr�ate on all property that 7s
zoned for a particular classification. The reasoning for a spec�al use permit would
6e so the Council could review that parttcular use on a specific piece of property
to determine �f it creates any adverse effects on the health, safety and welfare of
the residents of the community or on the surround�ng property, and the burden is
on the Council to show that tt should not be granted
The Public Works Director stated that the special use perm�t is for outdoor d�splay to
allow mobile home sales operation. The Ctty Attorney said it could be for an appro-
pr�ate period of time, and one of two things can be done make it for a period of
three years sub�ect to annual review or make it for a period as short as one year, but
he felt it would be w�th the understanding that if the �nd�vidual compl�ed w�th the
requirements it would have to be renewed. He did not think you could have him come in
and spend that kind of money and have it in operation only one year.
The City Manager stated that the outdoor display requ�res a spec�al use permit, 6ut
the Counct7 has the prerogattve of adding stipulations That is the basic purpose
of a special use perm�t.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick, seconded by Counc�lman Starwalt, that the Special
Use Permit SP #75-30 be granted for a period of one year to be renewable on review
atthat time with the stipulations agreed to by the pet�tioner in his letter nf March 10,
1976 which is the agenda, and with the stipulations that the office building be viewed
as a�rmanent structure for tax purposes, and that �f a problem developed w�th the
parkin9, revisions to the site layout would be made. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously
NEW BUSINESS:
CONSIDERATION OF THE FIRST REA�ING OF AN ORDINANCE FOR REZONING
ZONING
The Public Works Director explained that the request was to allow a business enterprise
to operate in this area for the sale of new and used class�c and antique auto parts.
The Planning Comm�ssion recommended approval of the zoning with the st�pulation that
the remaining parcel of property be rezoned to assure that there would not 6e an
undevelopable parcel of property. He stated that Mr Haluptzok was not present, how-
ever, in a discussion wtth the petitioner it was indicated that prior to the f�nal
cons�deration by the Council there would be certain agreements wrth the pet�tioner
whereby he would agree to the various stipulations and suggestions made by the Plann�ng
Commission.
MOTION by Counc�lman Starwalt, seconded by Councilwoman Kukowskr, to adopt the rezoning
ordinance on first reading, waiving the reading. Upon a vo�ce vote, all voting aye,
iiayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 15, 1976
EIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING CDMMISSI
RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECR
�
1
1
IN
PAGE 4
FEB. 23. 1976
Mr. J�m Klemp, President of the AAU Swim Club said that he had appeared before
the Council �n �anuary and requested $200 for a forthcoming meet. At that time
Councilman Starwalt suggested that he go to the Parks and Recreation Commiss�on
and discuss the request with them He ditl this at their January meet�ng and
they referred him to the Fridley Youth Sports Associatton, but they were not able
to support him because they were chartered to operate in the Fridley and Spring
Lake Park schools. He went to the Parks and Recreation meeting in February and
they made a mot�on that tt be brought to this Council, which is why he is here.
The City Manager suggested the City shoultl encourage desired sports activities
and thts should be considered in the budget�ng process. He said a resolution
could be passed that would transfer money out of the contingency fund. This
would require four votes of the Council
The City Attorney sa�d he did not like the way it was being handled and strongly
suggests that if the AAU wants additional money, they make application to the
Council and have the Counc�l budget for it Then there would 6e no pro6lems.
The City Manager inquired if there were any outstanding expenses that could be
pa�d 6y the City Mr. Klemp replied that the coach�ng is the 6iggest expense--
the primary expense, and that hosting meets they can raise funds in add�tion to
a rouser. Mr Klemp said that with the $200 the cost of patches for the meet
could be paid.
Councilman Starwalt said he recog m zed the worth of the AAU, and thought the Parks
and Recreat�on bepartment would handle the $20D request, and he hadn't anticipated
the delay caused by the vartous appearances in seeking funds. The City Attorney
said he would urge Mr Klemp sometime before July, before the budget process �s
finished, to have another session with the Parks and Recreation Department about
trying to inteqrate this and they can make a proposal to the Council The Council
can keep in mind that they had difficult legal problems in making the contr�but�on
at this time, and when the next budget is made ma,�be some assistance can be given.
Mr. Klemp said that in the future they w�ll prepare a f�nanc�al sheet and a l�sting
of the ob,7ectives and go to the Parks and Recreation �epartment. He would like
some support as th�s is an on-going th�ng. The program is not confined to the
particular school or schools.
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowsk�, seconded by Counctlman Starwalt, to adopt Resolu-
t�on No. 3D-1976 transferr�ng funds from the contingency fund to spend $200 for
patches for the AAU Swim Club Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor PJee
dec7ared the mot�on carr�ed unanimously.
PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #76-01, INNSBRUCK NORTH TDWNHOUSE IV & V, BY DARREL FARR
MOTION by Counc�lman Starwalt, seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski, to set the
publ�c hearing on the Plat P.S. #76-01 for April 12, 1976. Upon a voice vote,
all Vot�ng aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried una m mously.
PRELIMINARY PLAT, P S. #76-02, INNSBRUCK VILLAGE, BY DARREL FARR DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
MOTION by Counc�lman Starwalt, seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski, to set the
public hearing on Plat P.S #76-02 for April 12, 1976 Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carrted unan�mously.
Councilman Starwalt asked how people can be taxed at the same rate where we clear
the snow off and where we dor�'t clear it off, and how can New Brighton close off
the alleged pr�vate road. The Public Works Dtrector repl�ed that it is not a New
Brighton road. It is not a public right-of-way �n New Brighton. The roadway
that extends from Fridley to the S�lver Lake Road is an easement and the easement
�s �n the name of Fridley. There was to be continued maintenance by the developer
for a period of years. The same developer would have extended the roadway in
New Brighton, but due to finances he no longer owns the property in New Brighton
which is st�ll an easement.
�
�
1�
REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 15, 1976
PAGE 5
The City Attorney suggested that the matter be taken up with the developer when
the hearing comes up, that the required maintenance be done for a per�od of years
on condttion of approving the request. The snowplowing and other maintenance in
this matter was discussed and a suggestion was made by the Ciiy Attorney that
this be referred to the Assessing �ivision.
DESIGNATION OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER CORRI�OR AS A CRITICAL AREA
The Public Works Director stated that due to the Critical Areas Act of 1973
� the Metro Council came up with some recommendat�ons designating the Mississ�ppi
River as a critical area, and in 1974 they did adopt some rules, regulations
and guidelines, and after some input from all parts of the metropolitan area
that were affected by the proposal the Metro Council in 1975 finalized some
recommendations in this area.
The staff did review this and provided some input for the Metro Council in the
establish�ng of the regulations, and since that time we have had a reorgam zat�on
of the Planning Commission which now provides for the�r review.
The Minnesota Environmental Comm�ss�on is reviewing the Metro Counc�l's recommenda-
tions and they have come up with recommendat�ons of their own, and these amendments
are currently undergoing a publ�c hearing and th�s is 6asically what was reviewed
by the Fridley Environmental Quality Comm�ssion and the Planning Commission for
possi6le input to the public hearing at the Metro level.
The question arose as to what other mum c�palities are doing in relat�on to critical
area. The Publ�c Works Director said they contacted Brooklyn Park and they are
providing no input. Brooklyn Center is proceeding at the administrat�ve level.
The proper person for this at Coon Rapids could not be contacted The Public
Works Director further stated that at this point we feel the critical area is
fine. It is hopefully going to protect certa�n resources of the Miss�ssipp�
R7ver by providing a standard for development of the ad�acen �roperty. The
Planning Commiss�on has proposed some recommendations to the Counc�l on some
wording to the Minnesota Environmental Quality Counc�l. The letter drafted March 12,
� 1976 by Jerrold 6oardman, City Planner, to the Minnesota Environmental Quality
Council indicated those ttems the Planning Commission was concerned about, and
these are numbers one, two and four. Item Number 3 was an initial concern of the
staff when it was reviewed in early January of 1975 where there were soii�e defiini-
� tton pro6lems of what is a river bank and what �s a river bluff He ha the
impression that the area in Fr�dley is a rtver bank
The Pu61ic Works Director said that Item Num6er five m the drafted lettei° is
just an indication of what this critical area of des�gnation will do to Fr�dley
He referred to the memo he received from the City Planner preceed�ng the corres-
pondence to the MEQC and noted there are ten areas where the C�ty �s go�ng to
have to be involved in esta6lishing rules, regulations and guidelines �n relation
to the critical area. Fr�dley wtll have to come up with its own plans for
enforc�ng and for basically prov�ding rules For development along the river.
Referring again to the draft letter to the MEQC, the Pu61ic Works Director said
that Item Number 5 lndtcated We feel it will take about $8,000 in admim strat�ve
costs. This was another item requested in the public hearing notice
Mayor Nee recommended that the letter prepared by Mr Boardman be ainmended to
include a change in the proposed regulations on Page 17, Item I, Paragraph �2
The change would indicate ..."any non-residential structure .." in the second
from the last line
M�TI�N by Gounqlman Fitzpatrick to concur with the letter drafted by y=rrold
� Boardman, City Planner, as amended with addition �n the proposed regulations on
Page 17, Item I, Paragraph #2 to indicate. "any non-residential structure. ."
in the second from the last line, and adopt �t as a statement of our input to
the hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
P�OTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to receive the Planning Comm�ss�on minutes of
March 3, 7976. Seconded by Councilma� Starwalt Upon a voice vote, all vot�ng
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried una�mously.
RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ONE PORTAQLE AIR COMPRESSOR (BIDS OPENE�
� i i on n nn nnnnru n i n�c.
,
���
REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 15, 1976
VENDOR NAME
& ADDRESS
Air Power Equ�p Co
2631 Univers�ty Ave
St. Paul, Mn
BID
SECURITY
$234 Certi-
fied Check
TOTAL BRAND NAME &
PRICE MODEL
$4674 Gyro-Flo
160 cfm
DELIVERY
PERIOD
40 Days
PAGE 6
COMMENTS
Warranty 1 Yr.
Warranty 1 Yr.
Mp]s. Equipment Go No bid Bond $5196 Worthington #,160 M. 4-6 Wks. w/o QT muffler
520 S.E. 2nd Street No Security $5672 Same - with Q.T 4-6 Wks. W/QT Nluffler
Minneapol�s, Mn i year �
Road Machinery Co. $260 Cert�- $5061 Joy 150VQ 10 �ays Warranty
4901 W. SOth St fied check 2 Yrs.-a�r
Minneapolis, Mn end 6 Mo Engtne
Pneuair Engineer �280 Certi- $5595 Sullair 185 30 Days Warranty 2 Yrs
Sullair North Central fied check w/o eng�ne-1 Yr/
9250 Grand Ave. So. 2000 hrs.
Minneapolis, Mn.
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to award the bid to the low b�dder, Air Power
Equipment Corporation in the amount $4,924 (b�d price of $4674 plus $250 for
supplying completely Whisper�zed to conform to OSHA spec�fications). Seconded by
Councilman Starwalt. Upon a votce vote, all vot�ng aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimousl�.
RECEIUING BI�S AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1976-1 (BIDS
OPENED 11 00 A.M , MARCH 12, 1976
BIDDER
Bury & Carlson, Inc
Asphalt Paving Contractors
6008 Wayzata Blvd.
Minneapolis, Minn 55416
Ashback Construction Co.
492 13arge Channel Access Road
St. Paul, Minn. 55107
Dunkley Surfacing
3737 East R�ver Road
Mtnneapolis, Minn. 55421
H & S Ashphalt
5400 Industry Avenue N W.
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
Hardrives
General Contractors
3D30 Harbor Lane No.
Minneapol�s, Minn 55441
Alexander Construction Co., Inc.
County Road 42 & Fairgreen Avenue
Apple Valley, M�nnesota 55124
C. S. McCrossan, Inc.
Box AD
Osseo, Minn. 55369
Riegger Roadways, Inc.
920 W. 122nd Street
Burnsville, Minn. 55337
Total Asphalt Construction Co
475 W Minnehaha
St. Paul, Minn 55103
BID DEPOSIT
5%
5%
5% �
5%
5%
5%
5%
5i
5%
LUMP SUM BID
$224,727.39
�245,838.47
$218,813.23
�212,319.50
$227,238.48
$232,725.30
$245,968.97
$217,491.31
$238,502.13
MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski, seconded by Councilman Starwalt, to award the bid
to the low bidder H& S Asphalt Company, Inc. in the amount of $212,319.50. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mot�on carried unanimously.
�
�
REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 15, 1976
RECEIUING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SEWER, WATER AND STORM SEWER
PROJECT #119 (BI� OPENING MARCH 12, 1976):
i
The Public Works Director stated ihat with the Counc�l direction they proceeded
through the advertising of bids and received bids that were about 8o below the
preliminary est�mates
,-�
PAGE 7
Leif Henriksen asked the Council to state exactly what h�s assessment would be He
said that in his opim on the figure of $45,000 was ,7ust a round number He asked
� for the exact amount. He stated he had been at several hearings on th�s matter
and he wants to get started with his development There was considerable discussion
over dirt that remained on the property which should have been hauled away and
he asked who was to bear the cost
Mayor Nee declared a recess to obta�n records and to be able to answer the assess-
ment questions more definitively. (Recess Taken)
Mayor Nee called the meeting 6ack to order
The Public Works Director sa�d that the Council did provide direct�on for alternative
assessment rolls, but none of the alternat�ves related to the Riverv�ew Terrace
question. The pro,7ect figures are in, we have the low b�d and the final figures can
be provided.
The City Attorney said that the Counc�l has gone as far as they could on the matter
this evening, and the admin�stration would go over some of these because, as the
Council is aware, it is necessary to make a finding of the 6enefits of the pro,7ect
to determine the assessment. He would l�ke to be certain what rolls are presented
to the Counctl so it can be logically defended in case a cit�zen appeals and 'ne
would like to review this with the staff.
The City Manager pointed out that this item could be brought back on April 5, 1976,
and if the bid is�not awarded in 30 days, it becomes void
� MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick, seconded by Counc�lwoinan Kukowsk� to continue
consideration of receiving bids and awarding the contract for Sewer, Water and
Storm Sewer Improvement Pro,7ect fJo 19 until the meeting of April 5, 1976. Upon a
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unan�mously.
IDERATION OF APPRO�AL OF FINAL PLAT SU6DIVISION P.S �75-02, [3Y LEIF HEN
RALLY LOCATED WEST OF EAST RIVER ROAD AND SOUTH DF LOGAIV PARI<WAY (TA6LED
P�OTIOfd by Counc�lman Fitzpatrick, seconded by Councilwoman Kukowsk�, to table the
consideration of the final plat to research assessment figures unt�l the meeting
of April 5, 1976. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motton
carried unanimously.
RESOLUTION N0. 29-1976 TO ADUERTISE FOR BIDS FOR HIGH SPEED PHOTO COPY EQUIPMENT
The City Manager stated that it wou]d be cheaper for the City to buy the piece of
equipment rather than lease it, and pay for it over a four to five year period. It
would have advanced features and a seven year's ma�ntenance contract Tak�ng into
account all of these things, it would mean a savings of about $35,000 over the seven
years period, and the staff is recommending that b�ds be taken for it The machine
can be reimbursed on a use basis by the different departments, and it does not change
the 6udgeting process.
� MOTION by Councilman Hamernik, seconded by Councilinan F�tzpatrick, to adopt
Resolution No. 29-1976 and advertise for b�ds on the high spped photo copy equipment.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried una m mously.
LICENSES:
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approved the l�censes as submitted and on file �n
the City Clerk's office. Seconded 6y Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unam mously
CLAIMS
MOTION by Councilman Starwalt to approve the claims for payment as submitted.
Seconded by Councilman Hamerm k. Upon a votce vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motton carried unanimously
REGULAR MEETIIVG OF MARCH 15, 1976
ESTIMATES
MOTION by Counc�lman Starwalt to approve the following est�mates for payment.
Seconded by Councilwoman Kukowski Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously
League of M�nnesota Municipalities
300 Hanover Bu�lding
480 Cedar Street
St Paul, Mtnnesota 55101
Labor Relations Subscriber Service for the year March 15, 1976
through March 14, 1977
Weaver, Talle & Herrick
316 East P1ain STreet
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
For services rendered by the City Attorney for
February, 1976
$2,250.00
$1,111 00
DERATION OF COMPEfJSATION PACKAGE FOR PUBLIC WORKS AND PARKS FOREMEN:
PAGE 8
The City Manager stated that in 1974 the foremen were put in a supervisory category
except that the top foreman's salary was $200 higher than the top heavy equipment
operator's salary. Recently, after meeting and conferring with all four foremen,
the foreinen have showed the desire to be treated l�ke all other supervisory people
�n that their salary scale be �n no way tied to the u m on pay scale. The City
f4anager said, with that, he was recoinmendating that the proposal submitted be
a{�proved
In response to some quer�es as to why there are d�fferences in some foremen's salartes
the City Manager stated that it �s accordtng to posit�on and in relation to the
community and the degree of responsibiltiy and performance levels as ts true of
all supervisory personnel The market demand also influences the salaries
MOTION by Councilman F�tzpatrick, seconded by Counc�lman Starwalt, to adopt the
compensation package for Public Works and Parks Foremen as presented Upon a votce
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
AD�OURNP�ENT.
MOTION by Council�oman iCukowsk�, seconded by Couricilman Starwalt, to ad,7ourn the
mee,tirlg Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P1ayor Nee declared thz regular meeting
o� Niarch 15, 1976, ad�ourned at 10:52 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
John Chegwyn
City Council Secretary
.- ., �` , , � `i� �
Date Approved• April 5, 1976
V U "��V �'`fP�/"L
William J. Nee
Mayor
�
�I
u
'
L J