The URL can be used to link to this page

09/19/1977 PUB HEAR - 5626PETER FLEMING ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT PUBLIC HEARING MEETING SEPTEMBER 19, 1977 18() THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF iHE FRIDLEY CI7Y COUNCIL OF SEPTEMBEk 19, 1977 The Public Hearing Meeting of the Fridley City Council of September 19, 1977 was called to order at 7:42 p,m. by hfayor Nee. � PLEUGE OF ALLEGIANCE: � Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pled9e of A17egiance to the Flag. � ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Hamernik, Councilman Schneider, and Councilwoman Kukowski: MEMBERS�ABSENT: None � ADOPTIOry.pF q�Ery�q.: � � � Mayor Nee requested two iterr,s be added to the agenda, "Receiving Letter from the . lstands of Peace dated September 19, 1977" and "Consideratioq of the Potential � Charge of the Court Room to Columbia Neights." � MMITION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adopt the agenda as amended... Seconded by j Counci7man Schneider, Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the I motion carried unanimousty, � . VUBLIC HEARINGS: i PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1977_1 AND ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROUEMENT ,, PROJECTS: � MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to waive the reading of the Public Hearing notice and :� � open the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider�. �Upon a voice vote, a17 , voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanirtausly and the Public Hea�ring opened at 7:45 p.m. I The public hearing covered street improvements on Chartne� Road, Lucia Lane, �ellwood �rive, Pierce Street, 63rd Avenue, TH 65 E. Service Road; Talmadge Lane, Ironton Street, Able Street, Hickory Street, 73i Avenue, Ashton Avenue, Osborne Way, A1den ; Way, and 75th Way. � M�yor Nee stated the proposed assessment ro71 has been prepared under a formula which has been in effect for about 25 years in the City. � Mr. Sohiech, Public Works Director, stated, as noted, this is a public hearing to . receive any comnents and input from residents affected by the street improvement �; projetts. He stated, if residents have any comments about the actual improvement Project,. they should contact the City's Engineering Division. He noted the City . � stilt.has funds being retained which are to be used for sodding, drivewa etc. y problems, Mr. Sobiech stated the City has a one year performance bond and wi17 be reviewing : alt projects next year to go over all the aspects to be sure the contractor did fallow the specifications and proper construction. � � ,. ; Mr. Sobiech stated, generally, the costs for the projects have run about 15% below .� footfcompared�withs$14H08nined976e $14�44dine1975;�tand5$14580Pin 19 4telY 514.06 per : Mr.�Brunsell, City Clerk, stated the assessment wi77 be spread over a 70 year period . with interest at the rate of 7�%, He noted the property owner can.pay the assessment wi:thin 30 days without any interest. He further stated, if the assessment is not i � paid within 30 days, property owners will still have until. November 15 to make . PaYment, but interest wi11 be added for.the period from September 19 to November 15, 1977. i __ I r PUBLIC HEARIIJG MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1g77 PAGE , I� 3 , Mr. Ellis stated he is willing to pay for paving the street and concrete curb, but Talmadge wi11 have to be torn up in order to have it�drain properly. �; No other person in the audience canmented on the improvement projects for Channel � Road, Lucia Lane, and Talmadge Lane. ' DELLWOOD ORIVE, PIERCE STREET, AND 63RD�AVENUE: Mr. Sobiech stated this improvement consisted of concrete curb and gutter and bituminous roadway, with extension of some storm sewer. 7he front foot assessment was $76.44, with a side yard assessment of $2.33 per�foot. Mr.�John Carland, 6416 �ellwood Drive N.E., questioned when they woul�d be reimbursed for the damages which occurred due to flooding. Mr. Sobiech stated the contractor was put on notice that before any final payment would be made, the damages received by the residents must be taken care of. � Mayor Nee explained the front foot assessment for property fronting on Highway 65 � was $19.59 per foot: Mr. Joe Randall, 7210 Idississippi Street N.E., and Mr. Leighton Clar, 172g 63rd Avenue N.E., questioned their assessment, which was explained by Mr. Herrmann. No other persons in the audience comnented on the improvements to Dellwood Drive, Pierce Street, and 63rd pvenue. IRONTON STREET: . Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, explained the front foot assessment for Ironton Street was $5.78. � Couocilman Schneider que5ti0ned why it was blocked off. P1r. Sobiech explained it is not a thru-way, but for private use only. - Ho persons in the audience comnented on this assessment for Irontpn Street. ASHTON AVENUE: - Mr. Sob9ech, Public 4lorks Director, st�ted this is an h1SAS street�designed to Municipal State Aid Standards which consist of a 40 foot wide street. He noted the assessment is $21,49 per front foot for industrial-comnercial properties along�the east line of Ashton and the front foot assessment�for residential and park properties is $12,72, and $1.24 per foot for side yard. Mr. John Carland questioned why all the front foot assessments were not the same for these projects. . Nr. Sobiech stated some streets are wider and have additional base materials. He indicated there was no restoration of driveways and no sodding required in this particular area. Mr. Sobiech noted Mr. Carland's cost was slightly higher because of the�extension of the storm drainage. No other persons in the audience comnented regarding the improvement on Ashton Avenue. ABLE SiREET: . Mr. Sobiech, Pubtic Works Director, stated the front foot assessment for Able Street is $14.02 and that it is a commercial-industrial�type street. He stated the majority of the existing base material was utilized and to bring it up to industrial street standards, it�was necessary to install concrete curbing and an additional overlay. No persons in the audience commented on this improvement on Ab1e Street. HICKORY STREET: � Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated this street was made to 40 foot standards Tne front foot assessment was $)9.7), He indicated, in this particular case, Quite a bit of extra excavation work was involved. I � 4 PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1g77 PAGE 5 Councilman Schneider stated he stood before a previous Council and said about , the same things Ms. Eggert is saying now; however, it is his opinion, his home is worth more now because of the development. He.pointed out thaY there are � now well-kept, landscaped homes which would not have been possible without the street. ; Councilman Schneider pointed out as a possible future.development, he wuld . run his driveway out to the side street which he felt was a potential benefit. ! He pointed out if the street had not been re-atigned,�the assessment to her � property would have been more and the intent of changing the street pattern was , to reduce the assessment to the existing level. ' � Mr. Eggert agreed this�plan is less costly. He stated, granted he has access, but access to only the cul-de-sac. He indicated, with this plan, he gets all ,, the traffic by his property�and felt this is definitely no benefit. He also . stated now he has a house overlooking his back yard and cannot see that as an asset. Mr. Herrick felt that has nothing to do with the questiort of assessing the lot. He indicated�another point the Council should bear in'mind, an additional principle of assessment is (7) you have to shav a benefit; and (2) you have to treat all properties equa7ly, He stated, if you get down to how this property is assessed, he s not sure you wouldn't have a question from the developer that he is not being treated equally because of no assessment on the front. � Ms. Eggert stated she can see they are fighting a 7osing battle. She felt the Council should sit down and consider sit�ations like this, as she didn't think she is being unreasonable. She felt this was a unique situation and, if they don't feel it is, give her a call and expTain it to her. Councilman Schnei�der stated when Ms. Eggert says this is�"untque" because she is the only one in the City in this situation, he felt�you could find 200 or 300 cases in the same situation. � Councilman Hamernik stated he cannot agree this is a unique situation. He � indicated the Council has had other almost identical cases. Ms. Eg9ert questioned if that makes it right to follow this asse�sment policy. Councilman Hamernik stated it is a valid attempt to make it as fair and as equitable as possi6le. Mayor Nee asked the City Attorney to advise Mr. and Ms..Eggert, in the event the Council adopts the resolution as submitted for this assessment, what their ri9hts would be. Pis. Eggert indicated he didn't have to since�they were apparently aware of what procedures they could follow for appeal. Mdyor Nee advised they could appeal this to the courts. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the letter from Mr. and Mrs. Eggert dated September 73, 7977 r.egarding their protest of this assessment. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votin9 aye, Mayor Nee declared the rtrotion carried unanimously. OSBORNE�WAY: Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated this street was built to Municipal State Aid standards and design. The assessment for residentiai properties restarationPenofdrivewaytimprovements�and no�soddinycular case, there was no � Mr. Sobiech stated, in addition, an agreement was reached with the developer to put in storm sewer to the development to�serve areas to the west. The storm sewer is $3.61 per 700 square feet. P10 perspns in the audience commented reagrding this improvement on Osborne Way. ALDEN WAY: Mr. Sobiech, Public 4lorks Director, exptained this street was reconstructed to Municipal State Aid Standards. , lb6 PUBLIC HEARIN6 MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 19, 7977 �� PAGE 7 is that the residents on 75th Way are getting extra charge for the storm sewer for which they have not already paid. � Mr. Hogen stated he believes the reason the stonn sewer was voted down was ;� that Mr. Eltis was asked to contribute to this on their street and they did � not wish to have it. He indicated the residents in their block wanted a street ; badly because�of the dust. Mr. Hugen stated the sYreet, as it looks now, is � 400d. i� - Mr. Bob Toner�, 7598 Alden Way N.E., questioned the assessing of the west side � � of the street only. ' Mr. Qureshi stated there is no potential of additional storm sewer on Alden ., Way as.it is complete. Mr. Franz Flath, 91 75th Way, questioned when Osborne will be open. Mr. Sobiech stated they are working with the Anoka County Highway Department to improve this signal and are waiting for finai parts. He stated it is anticipated to be completed within the next few rtanths. Mr. Flath also�requested speed signs be installed. Mr. Thure Erickson, 7515 Alden Way, questioned why the St. Paul Water Works wasn't assessed for more costs. � Mr. Herrick s Wted he believed property��that is being�.used strictly for conduit would be very difficult to assess as you don't have a vehicle for showing benefit. Mr. Sobiech explained there was an exchange of parcels with the St. Paul Water Works relinquishing two parcels to the City and the City relinqvishing one parcel. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding these street improvements. ' MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the Public Hearing ort the assessment for St. 1977-1 and St. 1977-2 Street Improvement Projects. Seconded by Councilman � Namernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried �. . unanimously and the Public Hearing closed at 10:05 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1977-3 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECi: MOTION by Councilwoire n Kukowski to waive the reading of the Public Hearing notice and open the Public Nearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearin9 opened at 10:05 p.m. Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, explained this project involves the improvement of the street surfacing, curb and gutter, storm sewer and signal installation on East River Road from Interstate 694 to approximately 61st Way. Mr. Sobiech stated the East River Road improvement consisted mainly of curb and � gutter construction amounting to a front foot assessment of $8.63. He stated there was a signal installed and this cost was picked up by the General Fund supplied by the MSA developrent fund. ��, In coN unction with this improvenent, Mr. Sobiech stated there was a west frontage ; road improvement involving mostly the Georgetown Apartments and Lynwood Manor , Nursing Home. This assessment amounted to $13.84 per front foot. , �.. � Mr. Sobiech stated, along with the roadway improvements, there was a storm sewer and the benefitting properties received an assessment of $1.99 per 100 square feet No persons in the audience spoke regarding this assessment. ! MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to close the Public Hearing on assessment for : St. 1977-3 Street Improvement Project. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon � . a voice vote, ail voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carri.ed unanimously and the Public Hearing closed at 70:08 p.m. � � ih� PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1g77 PAGE 9 Mr. Brunse}1,�City Clerk, explained all properties involved in this assessment have signed an agreement agreeing to the principle of these Tateral charges. Mr. Herrmann, Assessing Department, stated the property owner in Auditor's Sub. N77, Lot 16, Parcel 2060 has made payment to the City in the amount of $1,545. Mr. Brunse7l stated this parcel shouid still be included in the assessment roll; however, the funds are here to cover this assessment and it will be handled administratively. No persons in the audience spoke regarding this assessment. MOiION by Counci7wwnan Kukowski to close the Public Hearing on assessment for water and sewer mains, laterals, and service connections. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing�closed at 10:25 p.m. RECESS: � Recess was called by Mayoh Nee at 10:25 p,m. RECONVENED: The Councit reconvened at 10:40 p.m, q71 Councilmemtiers were present. PUBLIC HEARING ON 197g�gUDGEi INCLUDING AMOUNTS TO BE BUDGETED FOR REVENUE SHARING U SES: MOTION by Councilwortian Kukowski to waive the reading of the Pub}9� Hearing.notice and open the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing opened at 10:40 p,m. MM. Qtireshi, City Manager, reviewed the appropriations for�General Government, Public Safety, Pu61ic Works, Recreation, and Reserve�amounting to a total of �$3,962,664. The appropriations�.for "Other Funds" was also reviewed, amounting to a total of $369,713, with a final total of E4,332,377, Mr. Qureshi explained this budget proposes a mi17 levy of 74,g which is close to the levy for 1977. Ne stated, if the same mill tevy is maintained, because of changes � in the assessed valuation formula, the property owners would see a reduction in taxes�for all homes valued to $80,000, if this budget is adopted. He pointed out that he is speaking for tocal City�government taxes; however, if all goyerrvnent units maintain the same level, the property owners should receive a reduction in taxes for the first time in the City's history. Mayor Nee stated the Council has worked on the budget for four or five months on a program 6asis, evaluating various components of the proposal�. He stated, under � the Charter, the City 14anager has the responsibiiity of proposing a balanced budget. ' Mr. Qureshi then reviewed the revenue sharing funds which the City hopes to receive �� fn 197g�amounting to $78G,520. He outlined the vaious proposed uses of these funds. Mr. Qureshi exptained the anti-recession funds, which are a suppiementary fund�, , in the amount of $9,036 have been allocated to Parks and Recreation. ,� Mayor�Nee stated there are no new programs, no increase in pernianent sfaff with the possible exception of two police officers. He stated the City has been . contracting with other governmentai agencies for CETA personnel and the City now ! has about 30 peopTe working under this program in a variety of projects�. These , people are financed by Federal grant funds.� ,,, � Mr. Qureshi stated the CETA people are being used in areas where tbe City pro6ably wouldn't be able to venture,�.if they had to rely on their.local resources. Some � �. areas where these persons are 6eing used�are ir, housing, senior citizen programs, and teen programs. ! No persons in the audience spoke regarding the budget. M07ION by Councilwoman Kukowski to close the Public Hearing on the 1978 City 8udget. Seconded by Counci7man Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting•aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing clused at 10:57 p,m. ` -- ------ -- i I I I I i i i �� PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1977 __ PAGE 71 � RESOLUTION N0. 102-1977 - CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT�FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 5 '� A S i MS MOTION by Councilwanan Kukowski to adopt Resolution No. 102-1977. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 103-1977 _ CONFIRMItJG ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 5T. 97 -3: MDTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to adopt Resolution No. 103-1977. Seconded by � Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 104-1977. Seconded by Councilwoman Kukows.ki. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanirtrously.� RESOLUTION N0. 105-7977 _ CONFIRMING ASSESSMEN7 FOR THE TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES 1977 : ,,� MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No.�105-1977. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote> all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the j � motion��carried unanimously. ; RESOLUTION N0. 706-1977 _ CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR 1977 WATER AND SEWER MAINS, �, LAiERALS, AND SERVICE___ �pryNE�TIpNS: ,. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resotution No. 106-1977, Seconded by Councilman Harnernik. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting xye, Dlayor Nee declared the rtation carried unanimously. COt�1UNiCATIONS: GENERAL TELEVISION, INC: AD�ITION TO CHARACTER GENERATOR: Mayor Nee stated Generat Television, I�c, has submitted a letter regarding the character generator the City is now using. The request is for the City to add one memory at a cost of $623. Mr. Qureshi stated, in�discussions with Mr. Hengerford, he wanted a guarantee from the City for use of the character generator for at least five years, with the condition that if they need it� they would pay the City back at the rate of £125 Pei� year for each year it wasn t used. Councilman Hamernik asked if this wvuld satisfy the desires of the Cable Television Comnission. � . Mr. Qureshi stated, basically, this is the same as what the City is now doing. He � stated the Cable Television Comnission is aware of this request and he feTt there . wasn't any problem, If there was, however, they wouldn't proceed. j� MOTION by Counc5lwoman Kukowski to purchase the character generator board for .�623 with the condition of working out the five yeyr lease agreement with General Tele- ; � vision, Inc. Seconded 6y Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,� � Mayor Nee declared the moti.on carried unanimously. �, ; LEFTER FROM ISLANDS OF PEACE DATEU SEPiEMBER 19 1g77 REGARDIN& ANOKA COUNTY �� SS�ST NCE: � � i ; • MOTION by Councilwoman Kukowski to refer this communication.to administration for � their:recortmendation. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all � votSng aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.� .. . . . . . . . . ...... ... .. ... .... � ...�..fi. � MEMO T0: DEPARTMENT HEFlDS � Following are the "ACTION5 NEEDED". Please have you answers back in the City Manager's office by Wed. Noon, September 28, 1977. f�1BLIC HEARING MEETING - SEPTEM�ER 19, 1977 - 7:30 P, M, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA�•10E: ROLL CALL: All Present ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Add: Letter from Islands of Peace. � Change of Anoka County Court Room to Columbia Heights. PUBLIC HEARI��GS: PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR ST� I9��-1 AND ST� ��JJ � SjREE; IM�ROVEMENT PROJECTS, � , , .-, . , , , 1 - 1 C Pu ic earing C ose . ACTION NEEDED: No action needed (Resolution No. 102-1977 adopted) PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR ST� I9%%�3 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT� � � � � � , , , , , ; , , , , , , , , 2 - 2 A Public Hearing Closed ACTION NEEDED: No action needed (Resolution No. 103-1977 adopted) PUBLIC HEARING P�EETI PUBLIC HEARIP�GS (CONTINUED) PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR IdATER� SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0� IZ1� .�� 3- 3 A Public Hearing Closed flCTION NEEDED: No action needed (Resolution No. 104-1977 adopted) PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1977) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ; , , , , , 4 - 4 A Public Hearing Closed ACTION NEEDED: No action needed (Resolution No. 105-1977 adopted) PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR �'IATER AND SEWER IhAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS, ,.,,,,,, 5- 5 A Public Hearing Closed ACTION NEEDED: No action needed {Reso}ution No. 1D6-1977 adopted) PUBLIC HEARING ON I9%$ CITY BUDGET INCLUDING AMOUNTS TO BE BUDGETED FOR REVENUE SHARIN6 PURPOSES, ,,,.,,, 6- 6 D Public Hearing Closed ACTION NEEDED: Prepare final budget and budget ordinance for consideration �� . NE4�J BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF A RE�UEST FOR VARIANCES BY INDUSTRIAL SPRAY PAINTING, ZOO IRONTON STREET N.E. BY AL TOEWS ,,, ]- � K Request approved with stipulations. ACTION NEEDED: Inform Industria] Spray Painting of Council approvaT with stipulations. �DISCUSSION REGARDIN� SUBMITTING PRELIMINARY APPLICA- TION FqR FRIDLEY`S INTENTIONS FOR A PROPOSED PARATRANSIT SYSTEM, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , � , � � � 8 - 8 A Approved ACTION NEEDED: Proceed with preliminary application. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPRQVEMENT PROJECTS ST� I9%J-1 AND ST. 1977-2 (MSAS) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 9 - 9 A Resolution No. 102-1977 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR.STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST, 1977-3, ,,,,,, IO - IO A Resolution No. 103-7977 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized r NEW BUSINESS (CONTINllED) CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0 � 121 � � � � � � • • ' ' ' • ' • ' � • � , � Resolution No. 104-1977 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized ,l,l-11A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT 12 _ 12 A FOR THE TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES �I9��)� �� Resolution No. 105-1977 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR 19�% I'VATER AND SEWER P�IAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS� � � � � � � � � � � � • ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Resolution No. 106-1977 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized IBINGO OPERATION ACTIO� �� Put on October 31, 1977 Conference meeting agenda cor�r�ur�icATioras: 13-13A GENERAL TELEVISION, INC: ADDITION TO CHARACTER GENERATOR, � � � � . , � � � � � . � . . � � . . . � � , 14 Approved ACTION NEEDED: Inform 6eneral Television of Council's decision. LETTER FROM ISLANDS OF PEACE--refer to administration for recommendation. ACTIDN NEEDED: Make recomnendation to Council. DISCUSSION RE6ARDING MOVIN6 ANOKA COUNTY COURT TO COLUMBIA HEIGHTS City Attorney to gather additional information QISCUSSION R€GARDING TAX LEVIES ACTIO` N NEE�E�: Consider input from the Council regarding the surplus fund by preparing the final budget. , FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: SEPTEMBER 19, \ 1977 NAME ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER s�ecaaaeeseaaoeee' �'a'oeaeeooe'esoeee= e'aeeo'�qe�oeaaoeaeseaeaaaessaaaeeoe�e�eo'c 'es"_"aq=.� � O "'�_ � aG. / £ �iM. %Tiv�: %3 / � iiR.+.u� �`�' / P I r1�1--^- �/Yl� �,L' ��r� o� � G (�� ,.ei� . �'. l � z � �-Q-P/ � < �� 67 ��':�.�'� �� "ti1 �`, y �� G7�r r4�..��/ . �P��/ Ll�`� �_ _D. � _ . , „ �n „ � �� — � �� fisi �� I.��1 �. ��,�� --� 0 S( � � P 7 7- s� �y�7 �-� � I l�i�� l"� ��7� � 121 b 199�-� �,� �� ai �4��t-I , yl� �, r � - sTiY» 2- �� -f 7- .-7� _ _ \ `f/-7ST/! l,//iY �',�• �,o �� /.l 9- 46 X� � � cd,c� '. 0 � r �� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PiIBLIC HEARIhdG MEETING — SEPTEMBER 19. 1977 — 7:30 P. M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA�•10E: ROLL CALL: ADOPTION OF AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARIIJGS: PUBLIC HEARIN6 ON ASSESSMENT FOR ST� I9JJ-1 AND ST. I9%�-Z STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS� , , , , , , , , , j - j C PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR ST� I9%�-3 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT� , , , , , , , , , , ; , , , , , � , � 2 _ 2 A I PUBLIC HEARIPdGS (CONTINUED) PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0� IZl� �.� 3— 3 A e PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1977) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ; , , , , , 4 — 4 A PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR WATER AND SEWER IhAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS� ..,,,,,, 5— 5 A PUBLIC HEARING ON I9%8 CITY BUD6ET INCLUDING AMOUNTS TO BE BUDGETED FOR REVENUE SHARING PURPOSES, ��,,,,, 6— 6 D NEl�J BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES BY INDUSTRIAL SPRAY PAINTING, ZOO IRONTON STREET N�E� BY AL TOEWS ,�� -% K DISCUSSION REGARDING SUBMITTING PRELIMINARY APPLICA- TION FOR FRIDLEY�S INTENTIONS FOR A PROPOSED PARATRANSIT SYSTEM� � . � � � � � � � � � � � , � � � � � 8 - 8 A CONSIDERA�ION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1977-1 ANn ST, 1977-2 (MSAS) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 9 - 9 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR.STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST� I9TI-3, �,�,,. lO - IO A NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMIN6 ASSESSMENT FOR WATER,.SANITARY SEWER� AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0� IZl, � � � � � � � . � � . . � � � � � � � � �I. - 11 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR THE TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES �I9��)� .�� IZ - IZ A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSE5SFIENT FOR Ig�� I'�ATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE 13 - 13 A CONNECTIONS, � � � . � . � � � � � � � � � � � � � ' ' ' C0MPIUNICATIONS; GENERAL TELEVISION, INC: ADDITION TO CHARACTER GENERATOR � � � � � � � � � . � . , � , � � � , � � � � , 1R ;i 1 i1 ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESS�4ENT FOR ST. 1977-1 ANO ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at tF.e City Hall in said City on the 19th day of September , 1977, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., ta hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: ST. 1977-1 AND ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROVEt4ENT PROJECTS The proposed assessment rol} for each of said improvements is now on fite and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Cler< of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of street improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services, and other facitities located as foliows: ST. 1977-1 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Channel Road Lucia Lane Dellwood Drive Pierce Street 63rd Avenue TN 65 E, Service Road Talmadge Lane Ironton Street Able Street Hickory Street 73s Avenue Mississippi Street to 68th Avenue Mississippi Street to 200' S. of 68th Place 63rd Avenue to Mississippi Street 63rd Avenue to Mississippi Street TH 65 E. Service Orive to Rice Creek Road 63rd Avenue to 750' North Talmadge Way to Osborne Way Hugo Street to Ashton Avenue 73rd Avenue to Locke Park Parking Lot 78th Avenue to 79th Avenue Pine Tree Lane East to cul-de-sac ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (MSAS) Ashton Avenue Ironton Street to Ely Street Osborne iJay East River Road to 75th Way Alden Way 75th Way to Approx. 400' North 75th Way Talmadge Lane to Alden Way The area prbposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is att that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above note� areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands Lherein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessm�nt to the district court by servtng notice Of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoptien or the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. DATED THIS 15th DAY OF August , 1977, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY UF FRIDLEY. ATTEST: TY CLERK - t4arvin C. Brunsell Y R- WILLIAM J. NEE Publish: Fridlcy Sun on August 31 and Septc�tnber 7, 1977 1 -�- 1 A MEMD T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE ST. 1977-1 AND ST. 1977-2 STREET IMPROVEt4EPTi PROJEGTS QATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1977 On the attached pages you will find the final assessment rolts for the ST. 1977-7 and ST. 1977-2 Street Improvement Projects. � We usually prepare a separate project book for state aid streets such as are in the ST. 1977-2 Street Improvement Project, and for the standa-rd streets such as are in the ST. 1977-1 Street Improvement Project. Because of the location of some of the streets involved in this project, some properties receive assessments for both regular and state aid streets. For this reason we have listed the assessment rolls for the two projects in one boaklet so that the total cost for an individual property owner is easily accessible. Separate final cost were prepared for each proJect. A surtanary of the costs follows: ST 1977-t--CHANNEL ROAD, LUCIA LANE AND TALMADGE LANE (Paaes 14-18i The front foot assessment rate including curbing is $14.06 per foot. The side-yard assessment rate is $2.64 per foot. Three water and sewer services were put in under this portion of the street improve- ment project. The costs of the services vary due to the type of construction necessary to put in these services. 977-1--DELLWOOD DRIVE, PIERCE STREET, AND 63RD AVENUE (Additional costs for r:sever:fac.ilities which were put in to ensure proper street drainage are in- d in the cost of these streetsl (Paaes 19-221 The front foot assessment rate including curbing is $16.44 per foot. The side-yard assessment rate is $2.33 per foot. One water and sewer service was put in under this portion of the street improvement project. The cost of the service was $1,476.16. ST. 1977-1--NIGHWAY N0. 65 EAST SERVICE ROAD (This street was constructed at a reduced width due to the limited nature of the local traffic.} (Pages 19-22) The front foot assessment rate was �19.59 per front foot. The higher rate is due to the fact that this street is assessable on only one side. -z- Paqe 2, Memo to Nasim Qureshi, City Manager, and City Council 1 B September 12, 1977 Final Assessment RoTI for ST. 7977-1 and ST. 1977-2 ST. 1977-1--IRONTOY STREET (This street was not improved to normal street stendards. It was improved to ensure continuous traffic floai to streets in this area.) (Pages 23&25 The frant foot assessment rate is $5.78 per foot. Water and sewer services were put in under this portion of the street improvement project. The costs of the services vary due to the type of construction necessary to put in these services. ST. 1977-1--ABLE S7REET (This street had special reconstruction includin9 an over- lav and concrete curb and gutter to accommodate heavy comanercial traffic.) (Pages 26&27 The front foot assessment rate is $14.02 per foot. 5T: 1977-1--HICKORY STREET (This street was built to industrial standards at the request of the property owner. The cost reflects a contingency for future wearing course at time development is completed in this area.} (Pa4es 28 and 29.� The front foot assessment rate is $19.11 per foot. 5T. 1977-1--73� AVENUE (hlinor storm sewer appurtenances required in putting in the new street were done under SW and SS No. 121 Project and these costs have been trans- ferred to the street project. The cost also reflects a contingency for a future wear- Contrary to normal City assessing procedures in which both a front foot and a side- yard rate are assessed, this street was assessed entirely on a front-foot basis due to the suggestions by the Council at the preliminary hearing. {Copy of minutes attached.) The front foot assessment�rate is $12.72 per front foot. ST. 1977-2 (MSAS)--ASHTON AVENUE {This street was constructed to industrial street standards.) (Paqes 24 and 25.) This portion of the street improvement project was assessed according to standard City assessing procedures, with commercial property paying the full cost per foot, and residential and park property assessed at normal residential rates with balance being paid from State Aid funds. Some properties also have a double frontage and receive a lesser rate on the back street. The front foot assessment rate for industrial and commercial property is $21.49 per f0ot: The front foot assessment rate for residential and park property is $12.72 per foot. The side-yard assessment rate for residential and park property is $1.24 per foot. The assessment rate for tfie back street on properties with a double frontage is $3.18 per foot. � Page 3, Memo to Nasim Qureshi, September 12, 1977 Final assessment Roll City Manager, and City Council for ST. 1977-1 and ST. 1977-2 -3- 1 C ST. 1977-2 {MSAS)--OSBORNE WAY (Storm sewer laterals and appurtenances were construc?ed aT�ng with this street improvement due to the development of Leigh Terrace, so were assessed under the City's normal assessment policy on a rate per 100 square feet of area } (Paqes 32 and 33 ) The front foot assessment rate is $12.72 per foot. The storm sewer assessment rate is �3.61 per 100 square feet of area. ST. 1977-2 (MSAS)--ALDEN WAY (This portion_of the street project was reconstructed • and realigned according to state aid standards and conerete curb and gutter werz constructed This is all residential propertv ) (Pages 34-36 1 The front foot assessment rate for residential property is $8.72 per foot. ihe side-yard assessment rate for residential property is $.70 per foot. ST. 1977-2 (MSAS)--75TH WAY (This portion of the street project was reconstructed to provide for surface storm sewer drainage, eTiminate cost prohibitive storm sewer construction.? (Paaes 34-3fi.1 _ The front foot assessment rate is $12.72 per foot. The side-yard assessment rate is $2.20 per foat. MCB ps e F% � � �..F'; Sspt�sb�r 13, 1977 7381 Piaetres Laae N.E. lridley� Mianssota SS432 Mayor Wiiliam J. Nee 219 Logan Parkway N,E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Mr. Hayor, We ue writing to you eoacerning the 73} Avenae portion of the ST. 1977-1 Strnet Improvsment Project, We eaaaot believs that ths eity council ia going to make us pay for a project that wae not city iaitiated, but initiated by a private party, We hane coatacted ths Attorney 6eneral's Office about this pro- j•cY. Iis office said that a homeoxaer canaot be assessed for a projeet unlesa it benetita your propertg� and Lhe legal dsfinition ot "beneYit" ia to iaareaes the markei valu� of your home. AYter coatactittg the Attornsy eeaeral's Olfice we trien asked ditfereat real eatate aompaaies and tks lridley Deputy Tax Aasessor if the market value of onr home is increased by this project, They said no! You ae Maqor speak for the citizeas of Fridl�►y. Ws fesl tha�t y�y ahould be backing us up in our oppoaitioa to thie aesessmsat. The policq beina uaed for Asaessment is unfair and not vat.id in this situation. Thank you Yur your tiae. Sineerely� �%!:5 • � %l%G> %i�vr� �G l� J J Hr. Er Mrs. John E6gert i CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNE507A NOTICE Of HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR ST. 1977-3 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Halt in said City on the 19th day of September , 1977 at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass uRon all objections, if any, to the pro- posed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: 5T. 197.7-3 S7REET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT � The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said Gity. ' At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is ihe construction of stree� improvements including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services, and other facilities located as follows: East River Road -- Interstate ;694 to 61st Way The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements witl be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment.and filing such notice �aith the district court within ten (id) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. DATfD THIS 15th DAY OF Auaust , 1977, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. ATTES7: ITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell MAYOR - WILIIAt•t J. NEE Publish: Fridley Sun on August 31 and September 7, 1977 2 2A MEMO Td: NASIM QURESHI, CITY t�FlNA6ER, AND CITY GOUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR/FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1977-3 STREET IPRPROVEMENT PROJECT DATE: AUGUST 22, 1977 On the attached pages you will find the final assessment roll for the ST. 1977-3 Street Improvement Project. This project involves the improvement of the street surfacing, curb and gutter, storm sewer and signal installation on East River Road from Interstate 694 to approximately 61st Way. A sumnary of the costs follows: EAST RIVER ROAD (Curb and gutter) The front foot assessment rate is $8.63 per foot. FRONTAGE ROAD (Street surfacing, curb and gutter) The front foot assessment rate is $13.84 per foot. STOw�1 SEWER The rate for storm sewer is $1.99 per 100 sq. feet. SIGNAL The cost for the signal installation at 58th and East River Road is to be charged to the General Fund. MCB/eh . CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER Ii+IPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ]21 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City.of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 19th day of September , 1977, at 7:30 o'clock P.t4., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvement, to-wit: WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SE4JER It4PROVEt4ENT PROJECT N0. 121 3 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open io public inspection by all persons interested, in the of.fice of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or aral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvernents. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of water, Sanitary sewer, mains and laterals and service connections, storm sewer and drainage facilities and related appurtenances, to serve the following properties: Deleier Addition Marxen Terrace and Marxen Terrace 2nd . Cot 31, Auditor's Sub. �129 Lots 4 and 5, Auditor's Sub. #108 The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. 5aid improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. . . A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City I�layor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. DATED THIS 15th DAY OF August , 1977, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. ATTEST: TY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsel YOR - WILLIAt4 J. NEE Publish: fridley Sun on August 31 and September 7, 1977 MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR/FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 121 DATE: AUGUST 26, 1977 On the attached pages you will find the final assessment roll for the Sanitary 5ewer, Water and Storm Sewer Improvement Project No. 121. This project involves the construction of mains, laterals, services, and storm sewer in the area of 73'2 Avenue from Pine Tree Lane East to the cuT de sac. The assessment rates are as follows: Water Laterals and Services Water Lateral -$11.38 per front foot Water Service - �305.80 per service Sewer Laterals and Services Sewer Lateral -$9.50 per front foot Sewer Service - $206.38 per service Storm Sewer The rate for storm sewer is $4.34 per 100 square feet less previously assessed storm sewers. MCB/eh 3A CITY Of FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINWESOTA NOTICE OF HEARIIJG OF ASSESSMENT FOR TREATt1ENT AND REP10VAL OF TREES (1977) � Notice is hereby given that the Counc9l of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the.l9th day of September, 1977 at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvement, to-wit: TREATt9EWT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1977) The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing tlte Council wi17 consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the treatment or removal of trees located in the City of Fridley. Lot 5, Block 8 Lot 3, Block 7 tot 3, Block 4 Lots 22 - 24, Block 16 Part Lot 25 & 26, Block 16 Lots 3& 4, Block U Lots 17 - 2l, Block 8 City View Innsburck North Pearson's Craigway Estates 2nd Plymouth Plymouth Riverview Heights Spring Brook Park The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and is the same as those listed above. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above notice areas. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of appeal upon the City tlayor or Clerk within tv�enty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the dis•trict court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUPlCIL OF THE CITY OF FRTDLEY THIS 15th DAY OF AJGUST , 1977. ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Ptarvin C. Brunsell tMYOR - WILLIAt4 J. tdEE — Please publrsh in the Fridley Sun on August 31st and September 7, 1R77. h1E�40 TO.: t�ASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AWD CITY COUNCIL FROt4: MARYIN C. BRUNSEL�, ASST. CITY MGR/FIW. DIR. SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSt4ENT ROLL FOR THE TREATt�IE��T AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1977) DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1977 The charges made under this assessment roll are made under the authority provided in State Statutes Chapter 18.023 and Chapter 104 of the City Code. There is a flat �25.00 administrative charge added to each Parcel of land. This assessment will run for five years with seven and one-half (72) percent interest per annum. The roll inc7udes work done in the latter part of 1976 and the work done in 1977. 7he property owners have had a minimum of six weeks ta pay the bills before being certified to the County. Some of them have had almost a year to pay the charges. hfC6/eh 0 4A � � AF30KA GOU�ITY. t1IHt1ES07A NOTIGE OF HEARIt�G 0�1 ASSESSt9ENT FOR WATER APID SEUER 141INS, LATERALS. AND SERVICE CONNEGTIOt�S Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of fridley will meet at the C1ty Hall in said Ci[y on the 19[h day of September , 1977 at 7:30 o`clock P.M. to hear and pass upon alt objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to ihe following improvements, to-wit: . 1977. NA7ER AND SEY;ER MAIt�S, LATERALS, AtlD SERVICE COtINECTI0N5 N0T HERETOFORE FURi�IISHEO AtiD AVAILABLE 5 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. � At said hearing, the Counci) will consider written or orat objections to the proposed essessments for each of said inprovements. The general rtature of the improvements and each of them is the construction and furnishing of sewer mains, laterats, and service connections and water mains, iaterals, and service connections in and to the properties, as follows: Parcel 1130 Parcel 1550 . . Parcel 1820, Lot 9 , Lot 15 Lot 16, Parcel 2060 tot 3, Pzrcel 690 R.165' of Lot Ti lying N'ly of 5.147' Lots 35 & 36, Block 6 Lots 37 & 38, Btock 6 lot 2, Block 1 lot 4 Pt of Lot 4 Lo£ 1, Block 1 • _ .Lots 22-25, Block K ' Lots 18 S 19, Blotk P Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 3, Biock 1 Lots 3 d 4, Biock 1 Auditor's Sub. fi25 Auditor's Sub. �77 Auditor's Sub. �77 Auditor's Sub. 577 Auditor's Sub. #77 Auditor's Sub. �89 Auditor's Sub. @729 fridtey Park Fridiey Park 6allagher's Addition Nerwat Rice Creek Terrace Auditor's Sub. �25 (�lillwind lst Add) Real Estate 10 Addition Riverview Heights Riverview Heights Spring Brook Park 2nd ' 7arget Addition Marion Terrace The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improverrents or each of Lhem and is the same as those listed above. Said improvements will he assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in Whole or in part proportionately ta each of the lands therein contained aecording to the Denefits received. DATED THIS DAY Of CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIULEY. ATTEST: ITY CLERK - Piarvin C. Brunsel 1977, SY OROER Of Thc YOR - WILLIA�•1 J. NEE Publish: Fridley Sun on August 31 and Septembar J'. 1977 MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANA6ER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN BRUNSELL, ASSISTANT CIT1' MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: fINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1977 SERVICE CONNECTIONS DATE: AUGUST 24, 1977 The 7ateral charges made under this assessment roll are made under the authority provided in Ordinance No. 113 and under Resolution No. 86-1962. Each of the properties have connected onto City water or sewer without having paid a lateral charge. All properties involved have signed an agreement agreeing to the principle of these lateral charges. This assessment is figured in two ways, either using today's aver- age lateral charge, or using charges that were levied in the general area at the time the lines in question were installed, plus accrued interest to the present time. The assessment rate used on the affected property is the lower of the above two formulas. MCB ps 5A CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARIN6 NOTICE "EXHIBIT A" 0 Notice is hereby givett that the Council of the City of fridley wili meet at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, September 19, 1977, for the purpose of: Holding a public hearing on the 1978 City Budget including amounts to be budgeted for revenue sharing purposes. Any person desiring to be heard on the above matter will be given an opportunity at the above time and place. CITY MANA6ER Nasim Qureshi Publish: August 24, August 31, and September 7, 1977 � City oi FriJIsY. PAinnesma F'R�GRaM BUDG�t iJ7a He�ourn pilocation ' Plan PFtOP�S�`r 6 � Pa9a � ' CITY OF FRiDLEY PUBLIC NO710E In confornance with Section 7.U4 of the City Charter, the fol�taaing City flanager's prelininary buGg=t for the year 1978 Nill be submitted to tiie City Council at Lneir August 1, 1977 neeting. ESTIPIATE OF REUEtNE *General Property Tax Li'censes Contractors Business Othe r Permits *6rants and Shared Taxes Charges for Service5 Fines and Forfei-turns Interest Earnings Rent Other �1isc. Revenue Insurance P,�fund (Police and Fire Peosions) Ttansfers Seal Loating State Aid Surplus Revenue STiaring Fund Liquor Fvnd Othe r General fund Surplus TOTAL: GEhEW1L FU�:D State Aid Funds Taxes GEttEPAL fUt10 P.PPRDPR;ATIC'�5 $2,793,843 General Governm_nt Legi5lativc § 114.122 8,050 Lity tianag=:nent 202,}90 � 5T,045 � Financc (Election, 6,500 dceountiny, Assessor) 2A4,6J2 78,175 Civic Center 11.0,2a6 813,355 Public Safety 72,295 . Police 1,033,C9a 75,004 fire ' 275,265 75,500 Livil Defense 7I,Q15 11,00� PuSlic 1?orks 2],8J.J Community Develomcent 243,II43 Engineering and Public 56,II00 Works Yaintenaoce 784,058 Recreation 40,000 flatura]i;C 131,600 65,000 Parks and Recreation 705,597• 190>070 85,000 • 3,000 110,150 Reserve 100,000 3.962,664 3,462,6G4' OTNER FUPIDS , STATE AiD iUF:D t 28).000 Stete Aid Lonstruction $ 287,000 � CiVIC CEt.TER FSOND NtJ'J � 40,180 Oebt Service 40.150 CAPITAL PROJECT FU!ID iaxes 42,$33 Capi tal Im.�rovement 42.533 Revotving TO?AL 07ifER PU::DS S 369,713 3G9.713 TOTAL ALL fL'[t6S E4,332,377 . • 54,332,377 *Dased on preti�inary infori^ation avnilablc at tine of publication. . Nasim M. �"�mshi City hwnager i N u '� N � Q' N b O Y � O � 1 N O O � r 1 � w Y � r � U b9 N N �n Y N O X W O O : � �.4 O O O � �O � n a Y � C1 N � N � i- •r- r- rtS C r U L 3 7 W � W � i � L O O' O 4- N 4- � �� O I�;f� I� N O) 1� r�CO O O O O r r-� C1 N C G7 ,-.. C U 1 N 1 1 o > °, ao 0 L L. M � O � �N � N i-� C N � L A N � N +� � � � o ro o •� d i Y v�y ro U • C �r U O C•e- v- �� 7 � O 0. f.. V O .0 4- N�r-Ci K>3 �•• 4J O U 01 U' i VI'r �- 4 0_.- r- p Z E G7 .� 'It C� •.- C 7 � ca E L N N �- O .0 4- 1 t-�croc� V C O r .�..f i� i c rt� N C � v U�. • N d 1n C Vl O d d •r Ea�iro •i i i U rtf N � �O� N I� > u.-rn p •.- m :t i r •r- nnuC � d d L W t!� C� �IL'O O � O C 4- i .�ILL ro o a O 6. � N i ro E u c. �a +� i �F- p� 4- • O N�� +i O i C i U1 N d L]. ��o r C 'p QE N � N •r vi t� LL..-� i CO 0 o«rn r-wo�r. � C d W � U fn W. 4-� 4- O FL- i R G/ 6 �+ >�O •� O 3� • r U 1-� iA �ciE o� _ �o v) N i U C i L O 0 0 � ti v- n. � ' 0 �� , � �w U N N � i t Y � N U1 i C 7 2 st i L O O V- 4- rOr'� MOC7 Or ^ tn r-It0 1 O 1 1 d C r N .-. V1 i V N•rN d lL. r d4- � G. O E � ro tA i-� i i Q1 ia L • vp_ 4- L 41 O O/ 7 •� 1' U N N N VI N N N d i 'L n La1l O C � [= li rt5 N l� � 1 1 O O 1 1 LCf O tn p • t0 O � M � d' � f N y..-� i C 01 3 f+'1 � � � � w �c c.�� E � � � a E 4- L O E O rn J O O W � V +� i � i a. w � ro N � > W O � F- L • +.� o .. a vi ro ^ � •rE- O .I] U :_ • al �--� '� i Y r _l O O io Ol L•] V LL .- U � �. A b � O V � „-' � � � U•�- Y � • �i 7 U i � O � O a [..) C In E O O � L i� i� i � � r6 .� ua• �� i N r • C n. VI O r- d U U •r il Y N G•r V oi > •r- > i. J-� i ou ar LL. b N ro y 0 i0 Y Y � U N i N N 1n _C C 1-� N O X tal � G1 N C N C � O +- N > W N 6. N � � N N i-� � N Y N � N r� r- .- ro Y G/ U • C >Y '�"' C7 N n J t � W n E O� O O O 4-J4-a' 0 o) o 0 0 0 n o n 1� O 1� r- r-� � 1 O 1 � 1 O 1 v3 C G1 1 iaiE y � LL !�•> C E N iY•�x- F 4- O •� U �O ro . N4-U�� M L O �n p i N L N � 'r C +� L 3 V- Y O rt7 O •r • d i� K f.. 4-� 'D � C.7 W F- i-� e- �O . h7 � � +� ro w ar. W N{! Cl 41 L c.> ,- � a� ar • VI •� � � Of C) i?�r- O C O H O t O r N i � 1+.. �.d dU 6- C.f OI H 4 W C F- V N W �--� � 4 oa � � Y Q � " d ` t � H � 4� Y Ol ar u s C �N •r L \ Gl .O 1-� E � �6 O rtf U d•r- i � s+ � N Y 1b 1 � v�d � .r. 3 4- a v1 L C O Nr-r+tf i i i O� 0 0 o c 4- 4- 4- •r 000 0 0 o u� �n vov ao �D N OO O O O w N r a' � 01 O � L N a� � ♦+ � � � E N Z i i y- pf +' � i N i�d C i r7 C N� � •r- i� c • ro E� C 1� E � i O +� O. u ns s...� ++ N � 1- N ++ N O i C N 4. dH �A � 0 1 O O N � O O W � v y � E I�il N L •r i O1 � ~ i N4-0. N O +i �.+ O L L a rtf a..+ >°%o L U n.— 'a � O N�^ Y UJ l0 i C Vl N O O •.- N la. uo� � 0 1 O O � N O O � M C � L � 3 i � N C Z •r- 7 �+ 2 R � r p� n r� Y V' s�. m N i� �% E � R NIL N O Y O ••- i ��ti U d Q� O- n N +� i � W Q � . C N W L � � 'O.L] .� C 'p � 1-� r � U c o QI•r- •.- U �s C U i ro.0 c ro ' r •r CJ.0 n n v- u 00000 0 o O �n uo N O O N a I�N N� N r- N 1 O 1 1 O 1 N Oi � � r U � � N > y .r- L O 6 N 'p i N N > n. O � O. O •r- y.� i Z rp LL v \: �: � O O O V 1 O 1 � �O � � N i � c ro . E�� o L L N d Y p � ..- � N i-� �� C rtt -� O N¢ +� •C � � ro p .L] 01.� 'r- i {� Z � � K O C N i �-.ou� F-- U •.- � W L i �' � O Ny,, Ulti VI � W K � r N � O � O � 1 Y r U t+4 N i N N tn � N O X W O O � M 44 C G! O C U O O •.- N > N L i N N C. N :H 1 O O O M � 8 1 O 1 � O N � r- N � W .� N Y G) E •r- r Rf > d-/ L r � � •e- Of +� E 3 � i ed i ia O i.i o. C� N ^ C �1- 'O � �O SO.. �.E3 O Cl O v1 N j� q •� O-i� C N i-� VI Z O i� N+-+ j L . CJ N Y'� iO CO • •r� U,� O 1--- Cl n. 00 i-� cJ Z >vN •r- O Gl vk U• N C �V N i VIr- .c a� o, o `n oi°i "" � z a.r •.- o v- s. u- o�a-�s co uo .+ o •.- a ai c !— >s > in �+.-. ..- +s � w L� > irf'aW i NOOt C' O U y 06 N OG.N �U NO li�r'U: LLv� K O N � b � bA J Q 1--� O I-- N O Z � W 2 O H N N W U W � 1 �--� z m Q O � b�► C O Y - N i0 N i u w � v c ro N Y i N �. �O M O O� Vi J Q H O F- 6D CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 23� 1977 CALL TO ORD:.R: Vice-Chairwoman Gabel called the August 23, 1977� Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:35.P.M, ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: �thers Present: Plerael, Kemper, Gabel, Barna Schnabel Ron Holden, Building Inspector APPROVE APPEALS CONiP�fISSIOid MINUT: S: AUGUST 9: 1977 Mr. Barna requested that the third paragraph on Page 4 be changed to read, "Mr. Barna said that as long as Staff and Sectiori 2Q5,072, 1, �A, (last line in the paragraph), had determined it could be handled by the Appeals Commission, he said that the Appeals Commission should act up'on the request. +� MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by NIr. Kemper, to approve the Appeals Commission minutes of August 9� 1977, as amended. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, the motion carried unanimously. 1. FRIDLEY CITY COD� AS s7Hr�R� U PIIINT 1y ... :.� i ' t1 i y OF Br�� . _ � . . AY . Spray Paintin� Company, 200 Ironton Street N,E. Fridley, riinnesota, 55432). PI APPPAT,S CON!�.ISSION I4F:�iIPIG - AUGUST Z3, 1977 Pa�e 2 ] A MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kemper� to Public Hearing. Upon a voice vote, all voting motion carried unanimously. The Bublic Hearing 7:38 P.M. A. � ADMINISTRATIV� STAFF REPDRT PUBLIC PURPOSE SLRVED BY REQUIREM�NT: open the aye, the opened at Section 2�5.�34, 4, A requiring a front yard setback of 35 feet in an industrial area. Public purpose served is to provide adeouate open space around industrial structures for aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. Section 205.�34, 4� C, requiring a rear yard setback of 25 fest. Public nurpose served is to provide adeauate space around i.ndustrial structures for aesthe£ic, fire fighting and access purposes. STATED HARDSHIP: Variance request to 0 feet back of building abutting Burlington Northern R.R. to accommodate covering over existing loading dock to provide enclosed facility for material handling, incor�ing and outgoing, and provide protected area for skids etc. and vehicles to conform to Fridley Planning Commission desires, Refusal of variance would create a hardshin in that it �ould curtail our utilization p:lans for total space needed for appearance and storage. Variance to front yard setback from 35 feet to lt� feet to alloc� construction of a 6' X 14� enclosed entry. C. ADhiINISTRATIVr, STAFF REVIE�N: The rear yard zero lot line request involves mainly Burlington Nortnern Railroad tracks. The petitioner wants to enclose the rear loading dock area, add an area to the north for loading dock purposes, and install a vestibule entry on the front. The existing building is 2g feet from the curbing on Ashton Avenue. Please note that Staff requires a more complete landscape pl,an before any permits could be issued for this project. APpT'ALS COMMISSIOPI MI',F.TING - AUGUST 23, 1977 - Pa�e 3 � B Mr. A1 Toe�ws representing Industrial Spray Painting Company explained to the Commission and the Audience that the Company was in the pr,ocess of buying the building and itt so doing, planned to completely finish the construction. He said that they planned to clean the rear area by building over the dock comnletely, enclosing s�rhat presently existed in the dock area. He said that they rranted to add on to the supplies room and to hard surface the outside area and completely fence the buiiding property. He said that all the necessary landscaping v+ould also be,done at that tine. Vice-Chair;�roman Gabel asked if prior to this time, had Industrial Spray Painting Company just leased the building. Mr. A1 Toe�vs said that they previously lea5ed the building and vrere noer in the process of buying the building. He pointed out that closing �•rou3d be August 3>> >977. Vice-Chairti��oma¢Gabel asked if there had been problems with the previous orJners. Mr. A1 Toeirs commented that the previous o�aner had never finished the existing building. He said that the previous owner had money problems and never completely finished the building. Mr. A1 Toer�s said that the main thino ti��as that the Compzny had to do something because children haci been getting into the building and disruuting things. Ae said that the Company had to do something to urotect the area and he felt +.hat the best tivay wcsuld be to cover the entire area of building and loading dock and fencing in the property. Vice-Chairrroman Gabel asked where the fencing tivould be located and hir. Toe�vs indicated on the plan the exact .location of the fencing. Mr. Ralph Officer of 315 Hugo Street N.E., Fridley, asked if all the nlanned projects required a variance. Mr. Holden indicated on the plan the areas that would require a variance. Mr. Officer questioned the statement made on the variance request that �vas on the Public Hearing Notice that stated, "the setback from the required 35 feet to 14 feet so that a six foot addition could be added". Iie said that 1y. plus 6 did not equal 35 feet. He ti�fanted to know if the City had established a different setback here by putting a street in. APP�ALS COMMISSI�P1 MLPTING -�UGUST 23, 1977 �Pa�e 4 � � Mr. Holden exnlained that by putting in the street, imraediately the building i�rould be non-co�forming. Mr, Arnie Toeais of 12�9 NL 96 Lane (also representing Industrial Spra.y Painting Company) questioned the putting in pf Ashton Street. He rranted to lsnow irhy the street couZdn�t be moved over more so that the Company would be a conforming building. Mr. Holden (guessed) that at the time the street rras planned, there rras probably enough space in the front of the building to conform to the existing setback requirements. Mr. Arnie Toevrs asked if the setback reouirement of 100 feet applied to both sides of the street. Mr. Holden expl2ned that the setback required of the M-1 zoned building :�ras different than the setback requirements of an R-1 zoning (�vhich is :,hat exists across the street from the Industrial Spray Painting Company), He t�ent on to say that technically the setback iaas iQ0 feet because the Company ti�as adjacent to R-t housing. Mrs. M. 5porre asked ivhat the building v�ould look like after it tivas completed. Mr. A1 Toel��s exulained as best he could exactly hotiv the building vrould appear� Mrs, hiargaret Sporre of 180 Hugo Street Ni indicated that her mai,n concern was the presence of fire hazards. vrhereMthe e hadt�beendacfire hadtresultedtfromrchildrenns Playing r�ith matches at the rear of the building. Vice-Chaireroman Gabel asked if once the dock area �ras enclosed reould that improve their ability to control the number of fires that the Company had e�perienced in the past. Mr. Holden and Mr. A1 Toetrs both agreed that it �ould greatly help the problem. Mrs. Sporre asked Mr. Toerrs about the fires inside the building. 6Uhat e�ould be done to control those fires. rir. Arnie Toe��s indicated that the Company had rrorked on that problem and he said that it tivas under control. He said that they had installed fire prevention equipment, APPP;AI,S C01d24ISSI0P? tZL��TING - AUGUST 23, 1�j7'7 � pat*e 5 �� Mr: Kemper asked if the fire department had inspected the. building. Mr. Holden said that it had been inspected many timos hy.the Fridley Fire Denartment. He pointed out that the building rras very tiaell constructed. He said that if the building »as not the type of construction it i�ras, it mould have been leveled many times from fires. Mr. Plemel asked if there t�as discrepancies•found by the Fire Department, did the Company have to co�nly. Mr. A1 Toerrs said that anything the Fire Denartaent indicated, the Company alrrays cor�plied. He pointed out that many areas of the building are presently totally porrdered sprinl>led. He said that that t�as a �aost advanced means of fire pre�ention. Vice-Chairrroman Gabel asked t�fr. Toerrs if this �ras a recent improvement. Pir. A1 Toerrs said that it had been done in the last six months. Pir. Holden said that because of the number of fires, he figured the Insurance Company t��ould make sure they would have all the most up-to-date preventions. Pir. A1 Toel,s pointed out that since �958 the Company had one laroe fire and one spray booth : fire. He didn�t feel that that �ras such a large amount of fires. Vice-Chaircroman Gabel asked if the fires had decreased since they had iraproved the building. Mr. A1 Toe�as indicated that since they had had only ttivo fires since 1958, it rras rather hard to decide if the fire hazard had decreased. Airs. Sporre tivanted to knoc� tivhy the Fire DepartmPnt rvas alNays going to the building. Mr. A1 Toeti�rs indicated that they erere called to put out "nuisance�� fires set by children playing rrith matches at the rear of the building or along the rai.Zroad trackse APPEALS COr'Q�tIyuIOPt t•ILETING - AUGUST ?_3, 1��7 ' Pa�e 6 � E Mr. 5porre indicated that a petition had been circula:ed through the neighborhood that �ras against the granting of the variance. He said that the majority of the neighborkiood had signed the petition against the variance, He suggested that the item be tabled until the next meeting so that the petition could be brouoht back to the peoole that had signed it to get input to them to better explain exactly crhat tvas being planned. He requested that the Toelvs' get some type of sketch to somerrhat shorr vrhat the building tivould look li'r.e, He explained that he preferred not to present the petition to the Comnission until the neighbors rrere better.informed as to �rhat �ras being nroposed. He said that by having some additional information neither Industrial Spray Painting Companynur the neighborhood urould have hard feelings, Mr. A1 Toe�rs pointed out that some of the items they were doing had been specified by the City of Fridley as having to be done. He didn't feel that any netition could stop some of the improvements that they were plannino. 24rs. Ralph Officer indicated that she had been approached by a person that had come to her home to have her sign a petition that the person knew nothing about. Mrs. Officer said that the pesson couldn't anserer any of the questions that she had asked her. Vice-Chairrroman Gabel said that perhans there had been some misconception and that maybe if the neighborhood could see that the plan s�ould be a vast improvement, they mi�ht not be so reluctant about it. Mr. Barna pointed out that the Abpeals Coamission eJas not the final body on the matter. He said that if the Commission approved or disapproved, it vaould still go to the Planning Commission and then to the City Council. Mr. Sporre said that some of the apnrehension had been the fear of the expansion of the factory. He explained that over the course of the years the neighbarhood had some unfortunate and alarming incidents ��rith people leaving the factory in the vray they had conducted themselves; drivin� through the resideiial streets and he said that this vaas maybe �•rhy the neighborhood had reacted in su�h a harsh manner. He said that the neighborhood �vould want to see exactly what mas being planned. APP�3ALS COMI�IISSIOPI ME3TIISG - AUGUST 23, 1977 Pa�e 7 7 F Uice-Chair�+oman Gabal indicated that hFr. Sporre had asked about tablin� the item and going back to the neighbors and better explaining to them what exactly cahat rras being planned; ho��ever, she said it would be entirely up to the petitioner since he had been the one to make the variance request. Mr. Arnie Toews indicated that they didn�t want any more delay in getting started on the project. He requested that the Commission proceed on the request. Mr. Kemper suggested polling the people that tivere present as to their feeling after hearing exactly trhat the plan encompassed. Ms. L. Sporre said that she erould v�ant to bring the petition back to the people that nad signed it and better explain to them exactly vnat was being planned. She didn�t feel that the names on the petition should be totally disregarded, She felt that the matter should be tabled until the next meeting at �=rhich time, she was almost sure, the neighborhood vrould give the Toews' their supnort on the pronosal, She, herself, s✓ould support the proposal with certain aualifications nlaced on it such as the screening, landscaping, traffic control, parking, curbs, and the kind of ventilation system that vrould be required, She indicated that there �ras a problem that existed �riih the present ventilation system. She said that ti�rhen a person walked docm Ironton Street to visit the Nature Center there was an offensive odor in the air. She would like to see that the ventilation system be brought up to standard, 'She indicated that there cras concern about the indust:ial encroachment on the surrounding residential property. Ms. Sporre said that the simple fact was that the codes appreciate the value that industry provides and customarily it �vas an industrial requirement to set back from the residential. She said that very close attention had to be given to the type of quality construction that would be done on the addition. She indicated that she would be willing to present the information to the people that had originally signed the petition. She said she evould present this information in a very positive manner. She said that she would prefer that the matter be tabled until the next meeting. Mr, Plemel asked ��rhat Ms. Sporre meant as to the encroachment on the surrounding residential property. Ms. Sporre said she felt it was more desirable to have the 100 foat setback rather than the 25 foot setback that was being proposed. � She said that that setback ivould affect properLy value. She indicated if rrhat rras planned i•;ould be aesthetically pleasing, then perhaps it rrould not be so di�agreeable to the residential property o�rners. APPliALS COPIMISSION MP�TIP'G - AUGUST 23, 1�7% Pa�e 8 7 G Several of the people present agreed c�ith Ms. L. Sporre. Several of the neighbors feTt very positiue about the proposal.. They indicated that by tabling the item, it c�ould only be delayed and the improvements would take longer to happen. Mr. Ralph Officer said that he vaas also a businessman in the City of Fridley as e�ell as livino 1� blocks from the Company, He said that he had confidence that the Fridley building insbectors, Fridley Fire �epartment, the Fridley Public CJorks Dir�ctor, and the Fridley Parks and Recreation people all �:��ere familiar rJith the situation at hand as far as �rhere the street .ras located and rrith tne . fact that the building rras present before the resiriential people ivere. He said that the only thing located in the area before the Company lras the railroad, Mr. Officer commented about Ms. Sporre's comc�ent re�arding the offensive odor rrhile c�alking dovm Ironton to the Nature Center. Iie pointed out tnat if a person ��alked do;�rn Ironton to the Nature Park the,y c.�ere r�alking on private property that belonged to the Railroad and Industria.l SAra;� Pai.nting Company. He said that there i�ras an ease�nent dovrn Ironton that enabled aeople to cralk into Coon Rapids from the Ashton extension. He said that no nerson had ever been stopped from rralking into the Nature Park by the nroperty oemers, He felt thaL the original petitior. should be presented to the Comnission so tnat it eaould go on record that those people had signed a petition that they knetir nothing about. Ee said that he tiras sure that the City of Fridley n�ould insure that it was a proper building, tnat it tivould be ��rell-built, ��ell maintained, and up to all the codes. He didn�t feel that the citizens really clould have much influence as to tne design of the building. He said that it 1�ould be done to improve the appearance of the building, at the request of the City. He indicated that ��hat ��as being proposed �ras a variance that rrould enclose the front doors. He said that the addition trould do ti�ro things; first it ti�rould direct thepedestrian .:: traffic into the building from improved parking lots; and secondly, it vould be an energy saving idea, Vice-Chairero�an Gabel suggested that the Toeivs' sit dorm rfith the neighbors and sho�v them tivhat they were planning to do. She said that the item vrould go to the Planning Conmission on September 14, 1977. She said that normallq the Planning Commission would only receive the minutes; hoc�ever, the item could be opened to discussion should anyone feel it ��rould be necessary to express some concern or rrant further discussion. Ms. Gabel also went on to say that it v�ould also go before the City Council, at ��rhich time they could a�ain be heard. APPi ALS COMMISSIOi�1 ME` 1I:IG - AUGUST 23, 1977 Pa�e 9 7H Ms. L. Sporre asked if the fire records ti�rere public records. Vice-Chairvroman Gabel said that they rrere not. Mr. Arnie Toetivs indicated that since Industrial Spray Painting Company had been deeded Ironton Street they will consider fencing in their entire property unless the continual lighting of fires on their property ceases. He said if they would be forced to do that, then the entire area vJOUld be off-limits to aZl foot traffic. t•4r. A1 Toei•rs said that as far as offensive orders; he indicated that the buildino r�as constructed according to coaes. He said that it �7as built according to all pollution standards, he said they 1��ere rrithin a11 fire codes, insurance codes and he felt that rras the best they could do. Mr. Plemel asked if they �vere inspected by OSHk. Mr. A1 Toelrs indicated that they uere. He pointed out that most of the inprovements lvere recomnended by the City of rridley. Ms, Lee Gasner of 361 Ironton Street NE exbressed concern o� the setback. She said that it vrould af:ect the value of the pro�erty if the lot is too close to an industrial building. She incicated that even if the person purchasing the hone didn�t mind, many times the loan companies ��ould make that a consideration, Vice-Chairrronan Gabel said that if the Company put on the mansard roof and acds an entry ti�aay to the front of the building and.oenerally cleaned up the aApearance of the building, it should be aestheticalZy more pleasing as v�ell as non-detracting fron P'Is. Gasper's property. t�ir. Holden oointed out that there r�as 86�000 �ouare feet and the Company could esuand to the Vorth and South tivithout any variances. Ms. L. Sporre questioned if a request for a building permit came in� rrould the City place the requirements for proper screening and landscaping on it. rir. Barna said that the screening, plantings, and parl:ing lot requirements l,ere as a matter o£ fact because they had been cited as not being up to the present codes, Iie said that the building as it stood t:•as not un to the present building codes for looks. He exblained that it i�ras a matter of an Ordinance that the Company make the nroposed improve�ents. • �1'P;��'�Lf; CCt2�IIS;IOP1 bS��'I��G - AUGUST 23, 1977 Pa�e 10 Ms. L. Sporre as'.ed that whether or not the Campany made any changes, t�tould they hav.8 to make the improvements. Mr. 3arna said that the Company r�ould HAVE to make the ir�provements. He explained that even if they �rrere not expanding, they i�ould still have to improve the appearance of the building. t4s. L. 5porre asked rrhat a mansard roof looked like. Mr. �1 Toer�s sho•^ed her as best he could vrhat a mansard roof looked like. He indicated that the professionally drarm plans �rould be available by :'lednesday, August 31 , 1977. Mr, Holden asked that hir. Toe��rs got a cop� to the City of Fri3ley Plannino ilenartment as soon as they could, Vice-Chaircroman Gzbel suggested that the neighbors taik t�tith the representatives of the Industrial S�ray Fainting Corapany bete�een not�r and the September 14th Plannin;; Commission meeting so that they better understand eahat the proposed building improvements rtould looli like. t�ir. 91 Toe�rs invited the neighbors to come to the Company at any time. Mr. Barna asked if the petition i��as going to be presented to the Commission. Mr. 5porre said that he didn�t vrant to do anything on a negative basis at that time. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by rir. Kemper, to close the Public Heasing. Unon a voice vote, all voting aye, the public hearing closed at 8:31 P.M. Mr. Barna commented that he lived 2-� blocks from the building in question. He didn�t feel that any of the, imnrovements pointed out on the dra��ting ��rould detract from the building. He felt that all the items rrould improve the building and he ti�rould have no objections to the variances. Mr. Plemel said that all the items seemed to be an improvement. Vice-Chairr+oman Gabel and Mx. Arnie Toerrs aopear meeting. i suggested that hir. A1 Toelvs at the Planning Commission 7I 11PPEALS COI•iMISSION P4^?TIi;G - AUGUST 2,j,� 1977 Pa.�;e 11 % � Mr. Barna commented that the statement had been made of the possibility of the petitioner fencin� off Zronton Street and he saicl that he �tas one of the people that had trespassed tivhile going to the Nature Park. He said he rrould like to see the street kept open by the neighborhood and the business staying on a friendly basis, t�orking closely to�ether to keen that access to the Nature Center open. rir. Kemper sai.d that reco�nizing the C�ty�s desire to clean-up the building and the fact that there •�fould still be ttilo onroortunities for the public to be heard regarding this subject (the Plannin� Commission meetino and the City Council c�eeting), he MOVED. that the �pneals Cornmission approve the reauest for the variances as stated. Mr. Barna seconded the motionJ and motioned tnat the original motion be araended to say, "That the Anroeals Commission approve the reauest for a varia.nces of tne Fridley City Code as �ollo:rs: Section 205.�34, 4, �, to reduce the �ront yard setback irom the req_uired 100 feet, rrhere adjacent to an.other zoning district, to 14 feet, and, Section 205.t34., y., C, to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to zero feet, to alloia the construction of a 6 foot by 14 foot enclosed entry and Zoadin� dock to an existing industrial building, located on all that part of the SYl w of the Pi% � of Section 3, T-30, R-2t�, described as follovrs: Be�inning at a point on the Lasterly extension of the South line of Ironton Street as platten Her;ral 9ddition� distant z60 feet East of the t9est line of said quarter; thence �ast and parallel rrith said ';lest line £or a distance of 415 feet; thence East and parallel ivith the said Easterly extension of Ironton Street to the Southerly right of ivay line of the Great Northern Rail�vay Company; thence Northr�esterly along said right of rray line to its intersect on r�ith the said Basterly estension of the South Line of Ironton Street; thence l'lest to the point of beginning� ihe sane being 200 Ironton Street N.E. Fridley, Minnesota� and that the landscape plans� sereening� curbing, blacktopping, and all iaprovements be part of the recommendation. Mr. BarnaTS motion to amend the original motion, tivas seconded by Mr. Kemper. UPON A VOICE VOTi, OF TN:s FIRST ri0TI0N, all voting aye� the motion carried unanie�ously. UPOr1 A VOICr� VOTE OI' THs At�IENDPD TfOTIQN� all voting aye� the amended motion carried unanimously. . - ` Y. 4, ,` � .(:!I � ♦ ' '�- ,�� ;e , ie•• 1 fS `i � T,� � � U _ � , �� .. 1 ` 1 • , ,, �� ) �1 �3�9�I �,� �'�iy�295 I285I2?5 I2b5' -' e t '� `° ' �s � R F• i.T , V� rn'lf.Y! . p�s . �tr .Re \ O .� 180 �• ��Q �Q L�i'O4 i�`o zeg, . � a��a a z E i� b* • E'�' 3�g�Q� %� � � i :F= �*i ;��a p 'K I � . . . . . , ., s � '� ,-„�s -,,;,� � �_ � 3 ' ` , .. +` • Z "�' S ?: ; ��o� . . �. �' � � �yb.�q ^ '� rf ..�� T¢� Sj�"^'/ • O �.�.� � \ 'Q� �'%A4�'��I � § /(�� ' . ��:�7+.ep8191 _ a—• •,8�7� -�s ,�� :rwr�:% v a3i5' � 8\8\ 5�.�� a 313C J R I�F! �'��" � � 8160 l � �. . � �� 3�60 ,� s : ' �rw/rq ••• a�S� � � �Amlr I�/�% E\40 � \q�j� '�i. t �'1 .� �/tii% . � N B�2o �, � 8�1 s o I '�% p Btil CENTER � . SEG d � \ ; 1. � �%/ / 7 1' � lndustria1 Spray Painting ' 200 Ironton Street NE � � ' �: ' • , � wMYe��/i.�ri/.fY.a= r �f - . GuoJ . � '�°:. m3° ese n �'��D . � �. Z e�. � / �...-[ i � �f E/t*s�E.GsA Z I Ac. i h t r� � ,____ ', m a T Y pr . M a V / � J�r+ Y ii�l�i � � •�'K � Cf? � "s ..: ""`� � p 8to1 . . / ? V i / y V � 4 � Y � Y 'f:i'�% ' 6n:. Go• _•zrJ• _ - - �p 7G IX�lG�'" _ _ " � ��: . , : . • � ; ;�-�;. �-::�•., � .' ::: . ?� : �A+��`� �r�� "�� Y; �� r 6431 UNIVER�SITY AVENUE� �N.E., � F�RI.DL-EY, MINNESO�TA 55492. TELEPHONE ( 612)571-3450 Septemi�zr 13, 1977 '+Ir. Dick Bravn Minnesota Departrnent of Transportation Director: Office of Transit Administration St. Paul, Minnesota Dear �1r. Bro�•m, As of August 17, 1977, during ti�rhich an Anoka County transportafion meeting was held, the City of Fridley decided to initiate a baratran�i+ �yst�i This letter of intent is provided pursuant to your r2quest for a preliminary appli- cation. It stands as an example of the City's sincere interest in deveToping a paratransit program. The follrn�ing is an outline describing Fridley's propos�d intentions for a paratransit system: 1) ,To serve disadvantaged r�arket groups in the comnunity. 2) Provide flexible, non-fixed route transit ;Jhicn would operate in harmony with existing MTC transit service. 3) Avert ridership from the single occupant automobile. Prese�itly, tne City of Fridley's proposal for paratransit is in a conceptual stage. Ho;•�ever, the City has dafined so:ne nasic elements for a successful para- transit program in Fridley: 1) Acquisiton of small van-type vehictes for easy maneuverability in residential neighoorhoods. 2) A dial-a-ride system which schedules and dispatches paratransit vehicles to and from distrinations. 3) Priority placed on service for targeted disadvantaged groups, (handicapped, elderly) 4) A reservation system which receives calls at a central location and assures paratransit occupants a seat. 5) Paratransit avaiTable on weekends for group use (on a reservation basis). 6) The possible hook-up with the demonstrative project connecting Unity and Mercy Hospitals and the areas regional shopping centers. 7) A combined effort for a paratransit system with the City of Columbia Heights. Advocating cooperation and increased ridership in southern Anoka County. The City of fridley is seriously committed toward initiating a para- transit system and is confident a paratransit program would operate on art efficient and economically sound level. It is requested that additiortal information concerning funding and shared costs for paratransit be provided to the City of Fridley. If there are any questions concerning this letter, please call Jerry Boardman at 571-3450 (extension 171). e SincereTy, � �� / ..� , ► _ .,,. ::� , ;�„� . JLB/de ., 0 RESOLUTION N0: - 1977. RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1977-1 AND ST. 1977-2 (MSAS) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1977-1 AND ST. 1977-2 (MSAS) in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in special session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed, except 4. The amounts specified in ihe proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. Tnis Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially,benefited by the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1977-1 AND ST. 1977-2 (MSAS) in the amount i'n said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. PA6E 2--RESOLUTION N0. - 1977 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified; and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assess- ment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and alterations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shalt thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1977-1 AND ST. 1977-2 (MSAS) 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of seven and one-half (7a) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in ten (10) annual installments payable on the first day of �anuary in each year, beginning in the year 1978, and con- tinuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AP�D ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1977. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CIT CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell 9� 10 RESOLUTION N0. - 1977 RESOLUTION CONFIRMIN6 ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1977-3 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1977-3 in said City against every assessable lot> piece, or parcel of land in � accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in special session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed, except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1977-3 in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or�parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. 10 A PAGE 2, RESOLUTION N0. - 1977 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assess- ment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and alterations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be•certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1977-3 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of seven and one-half (7;) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in ten (10) annual installments payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1978, and con- tinuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which wi17 be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF fRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1977. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: T CLERK Marvin C. Brunse 11 RESOLUTION N0. 1977 RESOLUTION CONfIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER. AND STOR14 SEWER IMPROVEMEN7 PROJECT N0. 121 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councit of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 121 in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in special session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed; except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: � 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces> or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 121 in the artwunt in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. PRGE 2-- RESOLUTION N0. 1977 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and altera- tions herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of lartd respectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and con- stitute the speeial assessment for WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORt4 SE�ER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 121 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of seven and one-half (7z) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in twenty (20) annual installments payable on the lst day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1978, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each instaltment to be collected with taxes colTectible during said year 6y the Cnunty Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the lst day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF ATTEST: C Y CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsel 7977. MAYOR - WILLIAM J, NEE I1 A 12 RESOLUTIOP! N0. 1977 RESOLUTIOPI CONfIRt9IN6 ASSESSMENT FOR THE TREATMENT AMD RE610VAL OF TREES (1977) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley; hlinnesota, as foTlows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the naturalist heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the . TREATMENT AND REMp4AL OF TREES (1977) in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of la4r, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description ofi each and every lot, piece, or parcel of iand to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Gouncil would meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all intereste� persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed: except 4. The amount specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. This Council finds that each of ihe lots, pieces, or parcels of .1and enum- erated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the TREATMEPlT AND REi40VAL OF TREES (1977) in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective ro17 in the amount set opposite the description of each such tot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. 6. Such proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected is affirmed, adopfed and confirmed, and ttie sums fixed and named in said proposed assess- ment as altered, modified, and corrected, r�ith the changes and alterations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted and confirmed as the prop�r special assessments for each of siad lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectiveiy. 12 A Page 2-- RE56LUTION F�O. 1977 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, sha11 be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and con- stitute the special assessment for. the TREATMEPlT A�aD RE�40VAL OF TREES (1977) 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereto untii the same have been paid at the rate of seven and one-half (7 1/2) per cent per annum. � Such assessment sha11 be payable in five (5) annuat inscallments payable on the lst day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1978 and con- tinuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each installment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement fo the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which wi11 be due thereon on the lst day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1977. MAYOR -. WFLLIAM J. NEE ATTEST: CIiY CLERK - hlarvin C. Brunsell 13 RESOLUTION N0. - 1977 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR 1977 WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the 1977 WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS in said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed; except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as follows: 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumer- ated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the 1977 WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or• parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. 6. Such proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected is affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as aitered, modified, and corrected, with the changes and alterations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assess- ments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectively. � 13 A PA6E 2, RESOLUTION N0. - 1977 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and con- stitute the special assessment for 1977 WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereto until the same have been paid at the rate of seven and one-half (7�) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in fifteen (15) annuaT installments payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1978, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each install- ment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1977. MAY R William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Marvin C. Brunsell 14 G�� L �'��\/i5ir�►� � i P�1 C. : OF FRIDLEY CciBLG-' 350-63rd Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 (E92] 56E-8'IOD a /'� � �� e^.r �`o•�.�ci)_ : e 1'-r�..� C.ni,T '•��c _'.p.lz.rA,"S �,��.(11,rGiI� ''.� l�ltl �' ilp (±'1p.rrlP . . . . _' P C �. , .:O . P . .. . �_ 7n aJ'1.!�.. C��.�3:nnf?Z �>rl� •?-.i I�, .. � � �. rl'�--,I.i.r;a.'"i O�^ n�F i7� ti� :,,,n„+- ��n�oq �±i^,^Y�.-n . $S �I'.l'_f?�.f?`. �n�.L��1C l_'1:fOT^7^±1.0^. +;^.'"10'^.: • (�'1�,9,v�,.,j�+]_^ 7!1 �.�!'i. j(� ^.'nn C1Il''1�1r'�i.o,' '�F;!`�i.L�-!., O',..?' C`'.�T?.Q�P7' .:nnr�-Fai;Qi' (J!"J.Dr.C�.'�r ie "�1�"11i;G^. £;,��1. 2.f';pr� �r��-r�,- �,�., �,,.r O"-�'.PT rla.'':� �.,.�.�,�Bl:"� °.a ,�..r,r� �.,,�., P'•101 �. 8�n2�.a 1`n-;_ �'.1_`." �0 .-i7_� �_ 0�:12 C^i^_".'.C�1.• .'.i0� 1-'_ O:r,�iinY' t0 iit;i_�inn %�O .. C.)�:rnn�^� �rp +�,-� 'i.'.,P j.+'�pr7:17.i.).OY!. O;'1 ;.',P O'�t(�' C�',2.L°F.C'"S-. ..'F?;lp'" ,',;Oi, pU.'� O'� -�p.�•� ,..�,3 .i 0: �S ,1��::.i1 �L1.iiL'O'�1.S1"• �i�`^.0 '_' .l'n}...�h, ��i_-� '�n.5 �'C ._ 1.;�'.2.�r -`."l2 C7. -;r ,...rp±]i? nc;p �nr.n C'"i_cr�nr�l g )''rne nn. .j.l. Siir'��. .7i_r�ic �,'�qi: . f ., . . . c �� ilPe�F`. t17.P.i• Tq�.F 1"'IiQ.P ��p`_ CO Q2 • ��<, -( i..OnP '.-0'.� �.11 .'.�n,..� •:2 9.T'° c(%C�.Li1'" cl. ''!.P,':! S?;2ti.0',�, �'�� 7i ��1;�., ' o cto'. i_.'., _ :fTO^1 .`i1�1 . � @ r--i _--+. Q no?- c •: -�!�a nrp:.l_�,:i i e -;�.,,; i, �y� :�oB��. 2, C. �.8i';�nt@Y' ^E??,.q:C?.�'i.0�^ o.;1C1 8. C'.�p,.�nP.�. "i�0 !l?.''C? -� P-.v�7 .'"8, l�E .1-1•_4 8:dcl_�.-+.''�ZE '-�0 O'.'.]' C',)S"%0=`'.E'_'.^.� ii'cl�.'^Pi '.'^�0�1 C�..l'_�SCO��"i�'lP ':,!'0 1..70='�'2.'l�' 881'P1CC! �'."P C1T•r n0`:: ?�-rpzri <�a - -� � . ., . ��.. . � . .. _ i-:�.�.,n.i,.,,.,. Cc,.^1.�� 'r78 '.2'in�aj ;:('"r,^�.-p c.�...-B3"F10'�.a Z3 l..,p Cl '+,'(f�'!'�,n', SE'2 ? 1_';, �O 2.'l,gOri -',�,P COSi; O''' l�_C]'P.2.SL'.�,_.. 0�1.7? nil.2.r$C��;P,7' •.P.Y1.8T2,10"_' ca.nacir-�� ,;e co�,lr'• se»er�.te c :,.e]_s �� ard. 30 le �r;-�� o,.e ro;^ 't''�2 C7.''? 2,,!� f'„��,i.,.. '.'_'7 O"".n .'C."' �'1C -.-f;l?.."t'�.:�. 1.15';i_n,-S� _' _ _ - r'^.8. COS't`, O:' CJ').LS 1:2C�'P2..�"�P iS: .<l/ilj;l.0'�g1 i;?i�r` •^:.P'n� �. p.'-;;•C'��-`�/) ^ T,a?;pr---' - . S'� i?�7J1^ ,. ��. < �� ,,,�,, �,r, "--.. . . . . _ � 3 . "'2C��LS2 tiE? ,�Q�Cj 1'p ng're Q,.r ['?ppi.cl0�? nri.o.r i'O :iy�_Ei.'?tc'i.tS a..C�'.LZ7c'1.1.� '{��,�1P ].9 O�. ��''-e EiS.."iPj�CP� . rtn�.�l.'�1C �rp,,. f0Y' Tr0':??' T�TOPIT?i co�.�i_dera�io�.. '2es*�ectfull.:j, �I� �'.��0 �"T,,ii�,�_ ,...n�.^'P.Y'.`�OTC�_ re:ne.r.al. ' a�_a;-er cc Ji�! "oe �^ �5� � n as � oy� p�a�e �wov�sor;r aoarco EUGENE DoLY, � CMeI AfMM� . Ye��m //�n.i.iiu�/:m� . EVENETfE 06DGE MrR.p/ bW.M 4MN br C.�ppre CMMVn FREDRICKJ DRESSEfl ,IUe.warFbr.ar5ri.y . ��,...��., FOST[R �UfriYlpplE Y.s�hn:Mwi � - .Yr�reeceNMws � /or I�r /IanNtqpe! W�Ll1AM GREGG R6MM�na�w �.�,�.�.�.. o„�»«�. . pICNANOJACO850N ��..,..;a... �hd!aYSINe4nY � FRANK MNNSON . f.iswiwPweror rw�.y�asww.r erwrw HOBEA7KOWAI.CZYK �� F.�.,��.�. ,v.nurw �aicwv.e 9AVEXRUEGEfl � �«..w..... A...a�..x�. ��,�.�:�. DR. JOS€VN AtOflIARTV � WieKHnpW lEOMOLSON fasnrMia.�pr � lrrwinyrWFmp'a�wrmt � d7f�n/.k+i'O�>buM Risylnc HOGERSCHMAUS »��w RoqrtLwuSter+mm f/nwmNry4MW � WlLL1AM SCHOENBQLbi e..w,»a�.o. �c..w«;,s�:mo� uioaNdc�+en...e � OR. BRON S TROEDSSON p� iMwFJI44/rwelVe%vu MoWN, AHrvhmb EOw1lME5 o.yMre. � is�uaus ov ve�ce CONMI7TEE ELAtEa P.OLSON. UNU$$. FRIT2 flON F. YUflTON .REV. M. G. QENYES REY,.E.A.CNMIELEri5K1 TOftY OISON v./.w. W WAYN� �ET71S AAfRMLNMI0+1]GI OOMAGEBVU aw.,sr.a.aw ��.�x�,,.� v,,,. w �RUTHSTARK Y./ �v Au..mwr �1ur M) ►nu�nnowN . �� [. an�,a Grr o� s..weY CMNIX.I AVKOWSAI srron�� , �r � ;> ,�� °}f�a � _- ` , � 'f„r , :..i� �`�£��0� I•Ir. James n. I.anQenfeld �nt! i��r�ure St�d� ?s-63�: lJay ��.�;., Fridleyr iln. 55432 '�Qt' ��fG.'Q'S/Ol1� Septe�ber 19,1977 ' CITY OF fiRIDLEYe6431 UNIVERSIN AVENUE N. E. � FRIDLEY, MtNNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE (612) 560-3450 Dir, tililli�rs J, iiee, Mayor, City of Fridleq, Fridley City H�11, Frid7.e;�, 2:n. 55432 Subj: Foundaytion for the Zslands of Peace - AnoIcz Coun�y Q.s9ia� Lanciei Dear Bill: Enclosed please find the following correspondence: (a) E�tr.. dtd. 8-31-77 to i;r. A1 i{ordiak, Chairman, Anoka County Boerd of Connissioners, from Jau�ea I.a ngenf e ld . (b) I.tr. dtd. 9-12-77 to Deve Torkildsonx Director :arks and Recreation Dept. .F.noka. Cty, from !�1 Kordiak, The encicaed correspondence clearilg inflicate the Fottndations� desire ar,d motives in �romoting the n2ceseary activities �.r.d servicec as outlir,ed in the recent Iease agreement. The Foundation would anpreciE.te a letter to eitner l,2 F:ordiac or Dave Tor�cildson indicating the a.pprova]. and full supgort of tbe Council regardieg Ana�a Countys' as�istance and in> VOZ4BD1@n�. � � . � . � - � . The �'ound2tion would agpreciate a co�r of the requested Zetter. A�ain, Bill� tYie Boerd appreciates the a�sistcnce the City of Fridley nas �i�en us. Respectfvlly, �' � ` / ' ' /l:l��FL � Saiaes Ii. �r �- nf d, Pre� etg�. Foundation For the Islar,ds of Peace, Incorporated "Whera peace is a way of life every hour of every day." �s� ��d L� � of p� a�e . �ovesonr nonno � EUf(NL b4� v, LY�.e/Aliru�✓� .�...r,,.�_,.,.�„ EVFnfFf[pppGE A. ry.y �,.:_,�.,w�. L•vwMl M�Hn.n FAFIfHIf.Kl. pqESSER r..�...��.,r.,�s..,.y. .,.�,,.,.,w....,. vosTen nuNwinwe vK....�.,.,, /�eA.x.nnrR....�n Fv W H.rn�Fr��qy. MIUTAM GREf.G K aw.�4.m3pw �w.�...��. e�cNnno inconson �..�.,ro.,. ��,...:»,...,. . FRANKJpHN50N E�rr.rmn,xre. � w.��.v�nr,�.c.,.n � � ,+.r.en.s noo�nM Kaan�cxvK � , lra.nYM.Mb.�M .�,.�..�.�.,„„ OAYE KIIpEGER n., � �wqRM�bOHIqn. �wrr, r��.run Dfl. J0.SfPH MOPIAif7Y � �/n�m�.o-'.r - GEON O150N f.wrn.�O.ncre. 1n:wu.arNF..MM�n�i � � NN�nplt�Nyy�My �.,<� ��AOCERSCHMAVS � M... �,.��..�.:,...,., .�,...,�. s� � 1YILLIMISCHOEN80LM . fM✓r•reb.rrm ��MMU Jeti/M1 N � oro�wsa�w�.,..a �u - 8R. BNOq 5, ipOED550N [w.� MrAw�MM�inrNVrw�m 1M�H1el. �/ y�� EDWlI,�1E5 �� IbLANDgpfPEALE MhW1i�EE " EL►1EHf.Ol50N LINUS II. /HITZ � �., woN r. num�x� �:11fV.Nf..UENTES � RFV.E.A LN�UELEN'SKI � �TONY p�i(N� vrw,x� ��YMYNE �E I 115 . �m..r..t.:nwMru! �� OONACI.HU�A � . Aw..�.rrlrpnw.y..xiy.y a..�.,,�, . . RViHFi.AqK .M/H Iu�.n.��rl�4IJ6J '-. ►�wi. enrnvH F. piwa Gry1II..prq . GNNOII Kl1KpW5K1 }�rwru� - . . n. . J.� ' �+.�F + . � i:•' � it � { ffy , '.l , . ...fN Na�r.�� .,� .�. ..� . . .`uJ�L . ii . "��l E:ecreation , / �,�� fl,B�Ci Idiiiiiti4.' S�i.i�j/ • Ja.mes H. .Langonfela �`! for �veryoo�e .. -. �s-63� Way N.�:., Fridley, Nn, 55432 CITY Of- FRIDLEY.6431 UNIVEHSITY qVENUE NAE.�uFRfD EY, MINNESOTA 55432 7ELEPNONE (612) 5G0-3q50 2Ir, Albert A, 'l.ordiak Chairu�an, Anoka County Board of Corsaissioners �noka Cour,ty Court Houae Anoka, ilinnesota 55303 Dear Mr, gordiak: The pa.ssing of ffouse Sile # 15 during the laet eeaeion the Sta.te Legislature hns reco�nized the need for out- recree�tien and nature otudy area namoly Tha Islands of �ark locsted in the Fridiey area of Anoka Coonty alang Afieqieaippi River, • .�' :. .: ► of door L�eFI C 9 1 the Thie project h�a received local, State, and 2Tation-wide rvco�nition as a unique proposa.l irrcahich all Communitiee c�n u�e as a r;adel. 7ue to the fPr reaching interest expreseed; We are reap- ectfU123• requesting the Ceunty of Anoka for a.saietance in providinp qqa,lified pereonno2 to perfox�n the ta.ek i» making thia monuraental undert�king a r9slity. We are hopefal that the " C E 1 A" program ca.n make this posaible. We have received �he ceoperation of.Pir, David Torkildson who has earressed interest and compasaion f or the of ten forgotten handica.pped and elderly and their neede. We o.re ask=n� for personnel know}.edgea.ble and e�cperienced in the concept and purpo�e of the Islanda of Peace, C.r; T personnel.can aseist us in ma.�ing ;hie project a eucceea, Anoka County could o.asume the leading role in meeting the �Beae of theao people. � ' !� ti '`�`:, Years of research and hard work hae givon the Islande of Peace insight and maturity, The znf ormation acquired as e result of our efforts ie available to the County, We would appreciate the Director of Parke and Racrestion,, ' David Torkildson, as the director. "Whero,p°°�° �S � Way of Iife evory hour of evn Y� . , ;� . , •� � �� ;, , ;, . � � AlBEqT A. KORDIAK•Chairman � � . Couney Board of Commifsioners ■ 1 COUNTY OF ANOKA Dllice ol the Counf y Hoard ol Commissioners COURT HOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 421-4760 September 7, 1977 James Langenfeld 79 63'� Way N.E. , Fridley� t•Yinnesota 55432 - Dear Mr. Langenfeld: Thank you for your August 31st letter relative to personhel assistance for the islands of Peace. I agree that you have a tremendously unique project that all of us should whole- hearted2y support. I have been at the Islands of Peace on several occasians and have had the opportunity of assisting 1�lx'. Wilmes on several occasions. I have discussed the contents of your letter with our County Park Superintendent, Dave Torkildson, who shares my views. Since the City of Fridley is quite closely involved with the Islands of Peace project, t4r. Torkildson wanted to discuss the matter with them to avoid any probZems in the County qettirtg directly involved and providing personnel. Our palicy in the past has been to furnish CETA employees through the loaal governing unit but Z am hopeful there will be no objections to this type of County involvement. I will pursue the matter fnrther, and by copy of this letter to both Dir. Torkildson and the CETA Office am asking that they work with you on this. AAK:dE cc: Dave Torkildson Liz Parker Ya� rs very tr y,� l�C, l�c ' Albert A. Kordiak Chairman, Anoka County Board of Commissioners �'r ;•� �i �, :; •i . ry 0 � � ' ..'�,,,� .� � �"1. ' : � �''�;�1 N ��• , t Y. , r ��, E,. , i�� '�ti j��r � -9 �u � •i' � 2?f' s i � ;e � ,,,r. . �,.. �� ; r.��•• , . r• a Ne�• ' � ' �e- �,`•y..«.. t, �. �: ; i + . �. e; `` 4-:� � Pi Y ' � {4. �i . . • . . .. .. � ! �.. ��11 t �.= .1 � . . � _ _.. . , �`.�:.,-,e` -: - « COUNTY O� ��9�C3��A� tNfiee ot �he County Raerd ot Cerrtmu►lamn � � - . � - � �, . . . CoURT HolJ5E --- 427-476D -- ANOKA, MINNEIiOTp 553f�3 septamber 12, 1977 - . ' Mr. Dava Torkildaon, Directoz Parks s Xecreation Depaztment � Activities Center `� 554 Bunker Lake Road � ; �., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 •- �;�., . ,Beai Dave: . , 'r Could you glease work with both Ed t412mes and Liz Pr�rker to establiah some type of CETA essistance to the Sslande of Peace. i presume by this time you have already dir�cuased the matter r�ith the City o€ Fridloy and hopes"ully recoived their o�Cay. The matter will hava to be anAroved by the County Board, but i anticipate no problem in getting quick appraval of the project. AAIC: sm cc: Ed Wilraes Youre very truly, Albert A. RordiaT: Chairman, Ar�oka County Soard of Commisoioners .... .� . �:.F�• :� . "� .� � - � + � d . K k � '� . r h 6 A \; � r•t ' i� _� ' �{� . . . Ii , �� I