The URL can be used to link to this page

09/11/1978 - 5423PETER FLEMING ADMTNISTRATIVE ASSISTANT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETTNG O� THE �RIDLEY CTTY C011NCIL pF SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 f'. 214 TNE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 . The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:38 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Counci7man Barnette, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Hamernik and Councilman Fitzpatrick MEMBERS ABSENT: None PRESE�JTATIOPJ OF PLAQUE (ROBERT FIUGHES, RETIRED fIRE CHIEF): A plaque was presented to Mr. Robert Hughes, Fire Chief who retired from the City, in appreciation for his many years of service. Mayor Nee stated Mr. Hughes has built an outstanding Fire Department and previously served the City as Mayor and Chairman of the Planning Commission. He stated Bob represented the very best in public service and inspired everyone because of his goodwill and unselfishness in the service he has given. Mr. Hughes was wished the very best by Mayor Nee and all members of the City Council. Mr. Hughes thanked the Council and City Manager and stated it was a privilege to serve the City. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:'� REGULAR MEETING, AUGUST 7, 1978: MOTIOP� by Councilman Hamernik to approve the minutes of August 7, 1978 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Fitz�atrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor hee dec]ared the motion car�°ied imanimously. PUBLIC HEARI�tG MEETING, AUGUST 14, 1978: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes of August 14, 1978 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. REGULAR MEETING, AUGUST 21, 197i3: Councilman Schneider asked a correction be made on Pages 3 and 4 to correct Mr. "Teman's" name to Mr. "Timo". MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes of August 21, 1978 as corrected. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all votina aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION 0� AGENDA: ; Mayor Nee requested an item be added to authorize submission of a letter dated ; 9-11-78 to the Minnesota 8oard of Corrections. ; I � MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt the agenda as amended. Seconded by ; Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: , I There was no response from the audience under this item of business. r \ 1, f` � i 215 REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMDER 11, 1978 NEW BUSINESS: DISCUSSION RECEIVING C PA6E 2 s RDING POSSIBILITY Of AN ORDINANCE LICENSING AND RE�llLATII 0 AND OTHER AUTHORIZED GAh16LING DEVICES TO QUALIFIED ORGI DITIONS TItEREFORE, AND PROVIDING PENALTIFS FOR VIOLATION`. R 29 UF TI1E FRIDLEY CITY CODE RELATING TO FEES, AND AMENI TION 11.10 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE +JICATIONS FROM FRIDLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: REDEEMER Mayor Nee explained this ordinance would expand the bingo operations and permit several other gambling functions. He requested the City Attorney outline what is permitted under this ordinance. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated the recently, enacted State statute makes reference to games of chance such as punch boards and pim�rheels. He felt this would be limited to the enumerated types of gambling devices set forth in the ordinance and wouldn't permit Las Vegas nights, blac kjack, poker or roulette wheels or any of that type of activity. Mr. Herrick stated he felt the ordinance before the Council was adequate, from a leyal standpoint; however, he felt it was a policy matter and his interpretation of the ordinance would be very narrow. He also pointed out the requirement that 8% of the gross proceeds would have to be contributed to charitable organizations. Mayor Nee stated letters ��ere received from several local churches in opposition to the ordinance. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the letter from United Methcdist Church. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor hee declared tf�e motion carried unanimously. Ni0TI0N bv Councilman Ba�rnette to receive th� letter in opposition from Redeerner Lutheran Church. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting a.ye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . MCITION by Councilman Hamernik to receive tl�e letter from Woodcrest Baptist Chur.ch. Seconded by Councilnian Schneider. Upon a voice voi�e, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declar-ed the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman flamernik to receive Petition No. 20-1978 in opposition from Fradley Covenant Church. Seconded by Councilman Schneider: Upon a voice v�te, all voting ayc, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Robert Polzak, who serves on the Development Qoard for Grace High School, appeared before the Council regarding this proposed ordinan�e. Mr. Polzak spoke in support of the ordinance, as he felt this would be a means i:o derive some funds to help in costs of operating Grace High School. He pointed out the Stdte statute is very limited and limits the amount of money that can be given out in a day and also limits the amount an organization can make in a year. Mr. Polzak stated the Development Board and himself, as a parent, strongly urged the Council to favorably review this ordinance. He stated the State statute refers to the use of pinboard and paddl�.board devices and another area would be a raffle, which Grace has used in the past, to help raise funds. Councilmar Schneider stated, if the Council takes no action on the ordinance, it is his understanding, that Grace High School would neither be more or less legal, regarding the raffle tickets for Snow Days, then it has been in the past. Mr. Polzak stated the statute is silent as to what would happen in that event, however, the fact is addressed that,the statute can be more limiting and that type of question would have to be interpreted. Councilman Schneider stated there appears to be great oppASition from the religious organizations although they may have conducted similar operations in the past. M � i 216 REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 PAGE 3 Mr. Polzak stated, if Grace High Scho�l is not permitted to have a raffle or pinboard; a lot of attraction for the public is eliminated. Mayor Nee stated he was concerned about the reaction from the other church bodies and asked if anyone was present this evening from these church organizations. There were no representatives present from the churches who had voiced opposition to the ordinance. Mr. Maynard, of the Fridley Lions Club, stated he was present mainly for information on the ordinance and stated the Lions Club only has raffles. Mr. Herrick suggested, rather than issuing an annual license for organizations that are conducting continuous.activities, it may be better to require an organization to make application each time t'r�ey are conducting an activity. He felt, in this way, the activity would be for special events and not a conti nuous. oper•ation. Mr. Herrisk asked if the communication sent to the various organizations also contained information on the limits of the State statute. Councilman Hamernik pointed out that the existing ordinance, the prcposed ordinance, and statute were sent to the organizations as exhibits, He stated he shared the concern about the number of negative commenl:s received from the religious oi°ganizations, but also pointed out the sports associations have conducted their fund raising, in the past, by selling raffle tickets and feels they also should be given some consideration. He stated he does have interest in the suggestion made by Mr. Herrick and perhaps ihis would be the way to handle it. He felt, if application is made on an individual function basis, this could also serve as a report which could be returned to the City when the function is complete. � Mr. Polzak stated the State statute basically sets out a number of thino, that do not become a gambling`v�iolation. Ne stated it is permissive for a City to pass an ordinance to allow gambling to occur and grar.t a licerise for one year as long as the gambling activity and organization qualifies. He stated, it is noi: a yambling activity, if it is an activi�:y covered in this ordinance and licensed. Mr. Polzak stated, if the City doesn't pass this ordinance and Grace High School would run a padd1eboard without a license, they would be in violation of the law. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to table this item and have staff checl: into the possibility of rewording the ordinance along the lines of issuing a license or permit for a lirnited time. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Mayor Nee suggested the members of the Council should contaci the organizations who have voiced an objection to clarify any questions. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor �iee declared the motion carried unanimously. '� CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AhiENDING CHAPTLR 601 OF ?YE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY RELATING TO THE MUNICIPAL OPERAT?ON OF LIQUGR: ' MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik•.� Upon a voice vote, all vo:ing aye, Mayor Nee declared the`motion carried unanimously. . RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION h1EETING OF AUGUST 23, 1978: The Council received the minutes of the Planning Corr�nission Meeting of j August 23, 1978 and considered the following items: DISCUSSION ON PROBLEM BUILDING SITES: I Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated there was discussion at the August 23 Planning Commission Meeting regarding lots, specificaily in the ,. I Narth Innsbruck area, which may be a problem. The Commission felt buyers may not be aware of the condition of the property and, therefore, they r �. REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 PAGE 4 suggested a statement be attached to the deed to warn potential buyers of the condition of the buiiding site. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, requested this item be tabled as he stated he could see some problems with it and didn't know if this kind of notice should 6e put into an abstract. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table and refer this to the City Attorney for review. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Schneider stated he keeps hearing aboui: wet basements and would like to know where there are problems. Mr. Sobiech stai:ed the staff has not received any complaints regarding wet basements. He stated, from the n;inutes, he would gather they seem of a general nature, but hasn't has an� specific complaints. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 3, 1978 - PARATRANSIT: The Council made note of this recomm?ndation and indicated they would consider the matter in conjunction with the paratransit proposal. APPEALS COMMISS104J M[ETING OF AUGllST 15, 1978 - RAMDNA BOISVERT; 534 FAIRMONT: Mr. Sobiecti, Public 4lorks Directoi°, stated a call was received from the petitioner; Ms. Boisvert, who indicated she wouid like this item tabled indefinitely. He explained there was a problem with the purchase agreement so there may not be a need for the variance. MOTION by Councilman Fii:zpatrick to table this item indefinitely as requested by the petitioner. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Mr. Ralph Swanson, 511 E'ly St�°eet, stated he was i:he pers�n who objected to the variance. Mr. Sobiech advised Nr. Swansoi� he would he notified if tliis item does come back befor�e the Council, UPON A UOICE VUTE TAKEN ON THE t�fOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ENERGY 7ASK FORCE COMP1ITTEE: - - : _ - -1 L�7 •I � i i i Mr. Sobiech stated at the August 23 Planning Commission Meeting there was discussion regarding the Energy Task Force Committee and he requested members of the Counc�il to submit any names of persors who may be interes�ed in serving on the Corrsnittee. He noted the C�rranission hoped to make a selection at their October 4, 7978 meeting. CONSIDERRTION OF PARATRANSIT PROPOSAZ: Mr. David Alschuler, representing Multi-Systems, Inc. appeared before the council regarding a paratransi.t prcposal and the i;wo alternatives discussed at the Council's conference meeting. He explained the first alternative is � very limited service, specifically for elderly and handicapped persons. He stated this would require two vehicles, operatina 8 hours a day, 6 days a week. He explained the service would be heavily subsidized and would serve a very limited market. j Mr. Alschuler stated the second alternative is different fron the other alternative j � as it is a service for the general population. This would be a shared-ride taxi service, operated by a private contractor providing service for 18 hours a day, 7 days a week. Mr. Alschuler then reviewed the cost to the City for the two different proposals. Councilman Barnette asked if any of the local transportation operators have shown any interest in becoming invo]ved in such a program. � 218 RE6UlAR MFETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 PAGE 5 Mr. Boardman, City Planner, stated the Fridley Bus Company has shown an interest, but he didn't knaar if the taxi companies were interested. Mr. Alschuler stated he fiad contact with Columbia Heights Taxi, Fridley Bus Company and Spring Lake Park Bus Company, and the bus companies seem to be more interested. Mayor Nee questioned the basis for their figures regarding daily demand. Mr. Alschuler stated this information was derived from similar type systems operating in Iowa and Connecticut: Mayor Nee questioned how many trips the cab company now makes in Fridley. Mr. Alschuler stated they were unable to get this information, however, their impression 4vas, at this time, the greatest majority of their service was service to and from the airport. Mayor Nee questioned what the City of Co1umbia Heights had approved. Mr. Alschuler stated they have approved a shared-ride taxi system with a heavily subsidized fare. • I Mr. Boardman stated he doesn't see the demand,based on the economics in the � metropolitan area. He didn't feel the City would have that much of a ride demand ; for the cost. Mr. Boardman didn't feel you could compare Fridley with a town - in Connecticut and didn't think it would provide the service the City wishes to % provide. Councilman Hamernik questioned what was happening with the Gol�en Valley proposal. Mr. Bob Howdek of the Minnesota Department of Traiispo�°taticn stated they are not going to accept Golden Valley's proposal as there will be similar projects in the area by the Metropol�tan Transit Commission. He stated the proposal for Golden Valley was for one veh'cle for the commur�ity and for theii° size, �it is not realistic. He stated, if Golden Valley chose to amend their proposai, the Department of Transportation would give it consideration. Councilman Hamernik asked what was the tie-in �vith the Metrepolitan Transit Commission in the Golden Valley and White Bear Lake operatioi�s. Mr. Howdek stated the MTC is operai:ing the White Bear project and proposing to operate the Golden Valley project. lie stated the contract is with the Metropolitan Transit Commission. Councilman Qarnette pointed out that once the program gets started, the City wi11 ultimately have to subsidize it. He stated most of the comments he received were against any paratransit system that would cost the taxpayers money. He felt the question was if the people of Fridley really war.t to subsidize a paratransit system. Councilman Hamernik stated he is not convinced the citizens of Fridley are ready to subsidize a transit system. Mr. Alschuler explained the paratransit system would be a demonstration process and the City would't have to participate, after the first year, if they found it wasn't working. Councilman Schneider stated he was reasonably pleased with the shared-ride taxi figures. He stated his concern is if it would really be used to the extent estimated. He felt, if 150 passengers are using this service daily, with 30 of them being elderly or handicapped, it probably does serve some public good. He stated he was concerned that the system might have only two or three people using it daily. Mr. Howdek stated a lot would depend on how this is set up with the contractor. He explained you don't have fixed routes, therefore, if the demand isn't there, you don't have the vehicles out. He stated, if there is a demand for this system, it invariably doesn't change from day to day and after a certain � amount of time, the operator can plan his schedule. 1'. ��:�; 219 REGULAR MEETIN6 OF SEPTEM4ER 11, 1978 PAGE 6 Mr. Alschuler explained, if the City would go on an advanced request system, which requires people to pre-plan their trips, it would not generate the same user charges or demand levels. He explained the greater the demand, the more efficient the system becomes. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated, it seems to him, that the shared-ride taxi has two advantages. One, it might truly be a demonstration of the need; and another, if at the end of the year, they should discontinue it, it would have a different effiect from diacontinuing a bus line. He stated, however, if it is successful and the City wishes to continue the service, they are ultimately faced with the decision of how it would be subsidized. Mr. Boardman stated, if the Council proceeds with a paratransit system, they wiTl have to undertake a marketing campaign to get peopTe to ase the system. Councilman Schneider questioned the impact on staff, if Council proceeded with a paratransit system. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the Council is well aware of the strain on the financ�ial resources over the last few years and this would be another step in that direction. He pointzd out, if it is not successful, you may have citizens saying money was wasted. If it is successful, however, the question is if the Council wants this to be one of tl�e high priority items for funtling. Ne stated it would have to be reviewed on an overall prospective,.as the City is entering into a number of programs. Mr. Qureshi pointed out you are talking more than $11,000 -�12,000 the first year since 90% would be financed by the State. Councilman Schneider stated, if the figures z�ere correct, the net cost of the system is more in the order of $100>000. Mr. Qureshi stated another question is, if the system is successful, will the Staie continue to fund at this level. � Mayor Nee felt the High�,�ay Department is not going to return the $100,000 for �` the system to the people, if ic is not used in i=ridley. He stated the rate � structure they are talkirg about is almost self-supporting. He felt, if it t Y can be demonstrated that this is feasible, tne City could abandon it to a totally private operation, once the market is developed. He stated he does, however, havesome reservations on whether the system would work, but he didn't think, with this plan, the City was looking at a long•-term subsidy, but to show to a private contractor that this is a viable system. Mr. Qureshi, City t9anager, pointed out the success ratio for these type of projects was not good and the question is if the Gouncil can look to experimenting and failing. Councilman Hamernik stated he is looking at the total tax dollar, whether or not it is city ar state monies, and capitalization is a signif�icant part of the cost and that he had reservations with the system proposed. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to table this item to the Council meeting on September 25, 1978. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Nayor Nee dec7.ared the motion carried unanimously. RECESS: Rec?ss called by Mayor Nee at y;27 p.m. . , RECONVENED: Mayor h'ee reconvened the meeting at 9:37 p.m. All Council members were present. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIM OF R. C. McCULLOCH FOR DAMAGE TO ELECTRICA! APPLIANCES IN HIS HOME AT 1516 WINDEMERE DRIVE N.F.: Mayor Nee stated he received a phone call from Mr. McCulloch regarding this claim and requeste� it be placed on the Council's agenda for consideration. � �20 REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 PAGE 7 Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated the City had a frozen service at 1510 Berne Road and they proceeded to call in a company to thaw out..the service. He stated the company went through the procedure to find the pipe to thaw out the service and for some unknown reason, the current, in this particular case, proceeded into Mr. McCulloch's house and damaged some of his appliances. Mr. Sobiech stated some precautions are taken with the house so to prevent a current from entering the house where the problem is, however, in this case, the current went elsewhere. He stated it is his understanding that this is the second time in three years this has happened in the City. Mayor Nee questioned if the welder attached at the points where he was told. Mr. Sobiech stated he was told to come out and thaw out the service. He stated it is hard�to say exactly what took place among the crew members. Mayor Nee asked if there was any evidence that the sub-contractor was negligent. Mr. Sobiech stated, as far as the City knows, he followed proper procedure, but they don't know why the current when into Mr. MrCulloch's home. Mr. Nerrick, City Attorney, stated if the City was negligent, the insurance company should pay the claim, however if they weren't negligent, Mr. McCulloch would have no claim against the City. He stated it may be that the individual who did the work did not do it properly or there may have been something faulty on the plumbing or electrical work in Mr. McCulloch's home. Mr. Herrick felt an attempt should be made by the staff to determine just what did happen. Councilman Schneider stated if the City doesn't get an explanation, the fact remains that Mr. McCulloch is still out i:he cost for repairing his appliances. He stated it appears less than a reasonable dout,t, the City or sub-contractor ,� contributed to D�r. McCulloct�'s pi°oblem. • MOTIO(� by Councilman Schneider to pay the claim in the nmount of $507.31, as filed by Mr. McCulloch, from the Utilities Fund. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the staff would check into this to try and determine just wha�: had happened. Counci)man Schneider felt staff should keep track of the costs involved for investigating this matter. CONSIDERATION OF REAPPROVAL OF P4UNN'S HILLCREST A�DITION (P.S. #78-05): Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated the plat for P1unn's Hillcrest Addition was approved on July 17, 1978, with some stipulations and one was that an agreement must be made with Burlington Northern Railroad to reconstruct the ditch to insure a positive drainage outlet. Mr. Sobiech stated Burlington Northern would not agree to this stipulation, but did indicate an a7ternative would be to construct a pipe within their right-of-way. Mr. Sobiech stated Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, has forwarded correspondence to Mr. Forbes, Attorney for Burlington North•�n, to rev�eti� this matter as there is a question if the City has ttie right to use the drainage ditch as it exists. He stated staff is awaiting a determination from Mr. Forbes if they concur with the original recommendation or whether they would agree to some maintenance or construction agreement. Mr. Sobiech stated, if there is no reapproval of the plat, the petitioners would like to proceed with just develaping the five lots that were included in the plat. �. I He stated the staff now has a hold on building on the five lots and a hold on the plat waiting for word from Burlington Northern regarding the drainage ditch. �,. �� 22] REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 PAGE 8 Mr. Sobiech stated he would recomnend they not proceed with the plat until all avenues have been exhausted regarding the drainage ditch. Mayor Nee asked if the area would drain without the ditch improvement. Mr. Sobiech stated if there isn't a positive outfall, the result will be a storage basin that would be marginal. He stated, at present, in order for this area to overflow in the ditch, the water has to rise a considerable amount. Mr. Herrick felt the position Burlington Northern has taken is unreasonable. He felt if they could discuss it, the City should be able to convince them ; they have some obligation and are not incurring a risk in allowing reconstruction � of the ditch. He stated he was not able to get in touch with Mr. Forbes, as he was out of town, but hoped the matter could be resolved when the information sent was discussed with Burlington Northern representatives. �. Mr. Daviii Libra, attorney representing the petitioners, pointed out that the problem regarding use of the drainage ditch involves further delay. He stated the petitioners have contacted Burlingtor Pdorthern directly and attempted to obtain their approval and offered to pay for the complete reconstruction of the ditch. Mr. Libra stated Burlington Northern's Head Engineer has declined and raised the possibility regarding their legal liability and also discussed the possible expansion af their tracks. He stated, at this point, it looks like their decision is irrevocable, at least for purposes of this development. Mr. Libra stated they are proposing to lift the Lemporary hold on issuance of building permits for development of the five existing lots. He stated this would not involve any subdiv�sion and would not'affect the existing drainage in the area. He siated, if Council feels development of the street is necessary, the right-of-way exists anr� Council could order that improvement following normal °� procedures. Mr. Libra stated, at this time, it becomes a question of economic feasibility and, therefore, requested the fiold on the �uildir�g permits for the five lots be lifted ar.d the property developed in accordance with the original plat for the property. Mr. Libra stated the point Burlington Northern made regarding the alternative to construct a pipe within their right-of-way would involve nine lots and it would be impossible to economicaily spread the cost of the pipeline on the proposed lots. Mr. Herrick asked if a delay of two weeks to attempt to work this out with Burlington Northern's Legal Depari;ment would seriously affect the development. Mr, Libra stated contractors, who have agreed to construct this development, are holding time open for this project. He stated he would p;°opose approval of the five lots, subject to solving the �roblem of the ditch, at which time, reapproval of the plat would be considered again. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated his chief concern in the development of this land is that they don't have direct access onto East River Road. He felt whatever development is there, some portion of Hillcrest should be constructed a� part of the plat and traffic routed to the signalized intersection. Mr. Libra stated there shouldn't be any linkage between the issuance of the building permits and improvement of Hillcrest. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated, he felt, if building permits are issued, there is some obligation for a solution to the drainage problem. Mayor Nee asked if approval was not received from Burlington Northern,.if it would be staff's recommendation to proceed with the five lots. Mr. Sobiech stated he believed the property could be developed by putting in the pipe. He felt this would cost from,$18,000 -$20,000 and, therefore, raise the cost about $2,000 more per lot. � ' � 2`L`L REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEM[3ER 11, 1978 pAGE 1 MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to table this request for two weeks and eontinue the hold on the building permits for the five lots. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF NAMING AUDITOR FOR 7HE YEAR 1978 AND RECEIVING LETTER FROM 7HE GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY: MOTION by Councilman Barnette to receive the letter from the George M. Hansen Company dated August 30, 1978. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Brunsell, City Clerk, stated he felt the City should require that the audit be finished by May 31, 1979. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to name the George M. Hansen Company as the auditors for the coming year and request that they comply with the State statute on the time limit and co,nplete their audit no later than May 31, 1979. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote., all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. TION OF COMMUNICATION TO fOURMIES, FRANCE INQUIRING ABOUT THFIR IN JOINING IPJ SIST[R CITY PROGRAM: RESOLUTION' N0. 81-1978 AUTHORIZING THE INITIATION OF A SISTER CITY PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF FOURMIES, FRANCE AND THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 81-7978. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpa±rick. lJpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Barnette stated Diane Ferry of the School District requested whatever informat9on the City receives to be forwarded to her as they are anxious to yet started in a sister city prc,g�ar�. � Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated staff has checked with a number of local organizations regarding their comments on a sister city program and the resporse was yu�te positivQ. He stated he would kcep these ergani�ations informed when the City receives a response. • CON�IDERATION OF SIGN PLANS FOR SHOREWOOD SHOPPING CENTER, RiCE PLAZA, HGLLY SHOPPING CNETER AND OSBORNE ROP,D SHOPPING CENfER: Mr. Boardman, City Planner, stated the signs meet the requirements under the Sign Ordinance and conform to present building designs and layout. He stated, as tenants change in the shoppiny ceniers, signs would conform to the sign pTan. Ne stated staff is reviewing the s�gn plans primarily to see that they meet the code requirements and to bring the signs into a more uniform situation that more closely would follow the design of the structure as it is now. Mr. Sobiech, Public Woi°ks Director, stated the main thrust of the Sign Ordinance was a design and a scheme. Mr. Boardman stated the height wou7d be standard and ±he length could be modified, based on the tenants. Mayor Nee stated he has a problem where administrative discretion goes beyond the ordinance. Mr. Boardman stated this is the staff's problem also, however, they have looked at the possibility, over a period of years, to require the owner of the property to come in with a scheme that would be more balanced. � Mr. Sobiech felt what the City was trying to eliminate, by adoption of the ordinance, was the clutter. , The architect, representing P1r. Levy, owner of Holly Shopping Center and Rice Plaza, stated they tried to present the minimum signs a tenant could afford. ; Ne stated, if a tenant wanted to go beyond that, they could. He stated ' Mr. Levy did not want to jeopardize his rgntal program by insisting every � ,� r I�� : REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 PAGE 10 tenant have a more expensive sign. He stated the majority of the signs put up are a plastic type. Mr. Boardman stated his only recounnendation would be that any new signs at the Shorewood Shopping Center be placed on the mansard and not the canopy. MOTION by Councilman hamernik to approve the sign plan for Rice Plaza and Holly Shopping Center. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, questioned the theme for the sign plan. Mr. Sobiech felt, if they can achieve the continuity, the theme can be worked in and, in this particular area, this might come out when the revitalization study is discussed. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . Mr. Boardman stated, in the layout for Shorewood Shopping Center, they have signs on the canopy and in talking with Mr. Elliott Saliterman, he felt, by putting them on the mansard, it would be cutting down on the visibility. Mr. Boardman felt it would be more in line to put the signs on the mansard. Mayor Nee asked if there was any provision for this in the ordinance. Mr. Boardman stated he didn't believe there was anything that says it should be at the discretion of staff or Council. He felt they had to look at it that the provisions of the Sign Ordinance are to eliminate clutter and whether to determine if they should be placed on the canopy or mansard is another matter. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the Shorewood Shopping Center sign plan as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declai°ed the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Namernik to approve the Osborne Road Shopping Center sign plan. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, ali voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RECEIVI AND 60T AN RESOLUT OF THE AN RESOLUT NEARIN6 ION N0. 19-1978 REQUESTING IMPROVEMENT OF ALLEY BETIdEFN 5 78 ORDERINf, PRELIMINARY P . crn['�T rnnnnrnrrxnrnir nnni VING THE PRELIMINARY TAIN IP+IPROVEhiENTS: S SPECIFICATIONS AND ES7IMATES . 1978-1, ADDENDUM �6 PORT AND CALLING A PUQLIC MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive Petition No. 19-1978. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman 8arnette to adopt Resolution No. 82-1978 order preliminary plans, specifications and estimates of the costs thereof: Street Improvement Project St. 1978-1, Addendum #6. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. llpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 83-1978 receiving the t preliminary report and calling a public hearing on the matter of certain ( improvements: Street Improvement Project St. 1978-1, Addendum #6. Seconded by i Councilman Namernik. Upan a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 84-1978 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS, SPECIFI Councilman Schneider stated people were opposed to the improvements and didn't see much sense in qoing through this again. Ne felt the residents were toid this wouldn't be brought back again unless they requested it. 223 M - , 2�� i >.__ ____._, . _ __ . . __.__ _, _ . _ _ _ __._ _ i REGUUIR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 PAGE 11 Mr. Sobiech, Public ldorks Director, felt possibly feeling has changed regarding some of the improvements and wou�d like to proceed with the preliminary plans to see if thei°e is some interest. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 84-1978, with the deletion of 66th Avenue, under St. 1979-1. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, requested that Arthur Street from Mississippi to Camelot Lane be added under St. 1979-2. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 34-1978, with the addition of Arthur Street from Mississippi to Camelot Lane, under St. 1979-2. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousiy. RESOLUTION N0. 85-1978 RFQUESTING STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO 7URN BACK TO CITY OF FRIDLEY JURISDICTION CERTAIN HIGHWAY FRONTAGE ROADS: MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. II5-1978. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 86- 19 TRANSFERS FROM THE PUELIC UTILITY FUND AND MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 86-1978. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voce vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 87-197£3 TRANSFERRING FUPdDS FROM THE REGULAR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUND TO Ti1E CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT �UND: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 87-1978. Seconded by Councilman Qarnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Pqayor Nee declared the motion carried unanirnous7y. RESOLUTION N0. 88-1978 DIRECTING PRFPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TREATP1ENT AND REMOVAL OF TRE[S �973 : MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resotution No. 8$-1478. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 89-197f3 DIRECTING PU6LICATION OF HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE TREATf+I'ENT AND REh10VAL OF TREES 1978 : MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 89-1978. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 90-197II AUTHORIZING TIiE SALE OF CERTAIN SURPLUS PROPERTY: MOTIQN by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 90-1978. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, ail voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unaninTOUSIy. ION N0. 91-1978 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING THE AGREED1ENT SNING I�JORKING CONDITIONS, 4!AG[S 11fyD NOURS OF EMPLOY[ES OF THE CITY DLEY POLICE D Mr. Brunsell, City Cler4:, stated, in prior years, the contract was all one which covered local and area wide conditions. Ne stated they have no�a tried to split it so.that the conditions negotiated on an area ��ide basis are Appendix A and the local conditions ar2 Appendix B. He stated there are severa] items in this contract thare are not addressed on the area ��ride basis. He requested the Council approve the agreement and staff would do more work on it to clarify some of these conditions. � i ` - . , � ,. ' , � . �.� 2. `Z. `i R[GULAR MEETING OF SEPTFME�ER 11, 1978 PAGE 12 MOTION by Councilman Hamer.nik to approve and authorize the signing of the agreement, with the additional sections that were presented this evening. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A REPORT ON MARKET STUDY FOR 7HE DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PROGRAM: Mr. Boardman, City Planner, stated letters were sent to about 15 different consultants asking them vrhat steps the City should take to make the downtown area more marketable. He stated, most consultants felt it would be a 4�aste of time to do a market study and what Wd5 suggested was that a prospectus be put together on land that could be developed and send this package out to developers and ask them for proposals. Mr. Boardman stated the cost for the total prospectus would be about $15,000 - $20,OOO,including the cost for the consultant who would be contacting developers. Mr. Sobiech stated they would get involved with local existing business to obtain their reaction. Mr. Boardman stated the prospectus would include the layout�of all properties, assessed valuation, engineering details such as sewer and water, availability, traffic improvements proposed and indications of financing proposals. Mr. Boardman stated, instead of getting into a market study, he felt this would be the way to proceed. He stated there are indications from developers that there is an interest in this area. � Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, felt if a consultant is going to put together a prospectus, they should involve the existing businesses and property owners. MOTION by Councilman Namernik to receive the report and authorize staff to prepare the consultant proposal for the September 25, 1978 meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared � -, the motion carried unanimously. � CLAIMS: �. `: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to authorize payment of Claims No. 236A03 through 250897. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a•voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. LICENSES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMATES: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as submitted. N.D.H. Incorporated 700 Industry l�venue NW Anoka, MN 55303 PAP,TIAL Estimate No. 1- Street Improvement Project $117,540.86 ST. 1978-6 Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor j Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � - APPOINTMENT (CITY EMPLOYEE): MOTION by Councilman Namernik to concur with the appointment of Sidney Inman, Accounts and Budget Officer at �1,560/month, effective September 25, 1978. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mation carried unanimously. .• . ! ,� 1`�EP�10 T0: I CITY f�IAPJAGER I 0 , 1FR�i�L�l� �� C�J�I�C � L . REGLLr-'IR i�1EET I�tlU — SEPTE�+�3Ei� ll, 1373 — 7; 3Q P,(�9 � DE.PARTMFi�i EiEAD5 FOL�Ot�IING AR� THE "ACTIOibS ��1EEDED" � PLEASE HAVE YOUR ANSWERS' AACK IN THE CI7Y MANAGER�S OFFIC� BY �r�EBNESDNY BEFORE THE NEXT REGULAR COUNC I L P1EET I NG � THANK YOU �(Sept. 20, 1978 �0 �OBERT S� HUGHES, RE7IRED FIRE CHIEF Plaque present�d to Chief Hughes APPROVAL OF f�'iI;�aUTES: r�EGULAR i��EETING, AuGUS� 7, 197� Approved � , PUBLIC EiEARING iY�EETI(�IG, Au�usr T4, 1973 Approved � t�EGU�AR I`iFETING, aUGUST 2�., Ig%;� Adopted with change of Spelling of name of Mr. Tima on page3 & 4 ACTION 7AKEN: Name has been chanqed in official minutes ADOPT I Oi� OF �GE�iDA : Added: Approval of Letter to htinnesota Corrections Board Dated September 11, 1978 0 OPEP� FO RU� 1, V�I S I TORS : �CONSIDERATION OF ITEt�1S NQT ON AGENDA — IS I'�1NUTES) No Response IFINAN 0 � I iJE�� US I iJESS : DISCUSSION REGARDiNG �QSSIBILITY OF /�N ORDINANCE LICENSIfVG . AND REGULATING THE CONDUCT OF BINGO A�JD OTNER AUTHORIZED �AMBLING DEVICES TO QUALIFIFD ORGANIZ!�TIONS, �RE5CRIBING CONDITIONS.THEREFORE, NND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLA- TIONS THEREOF; �MENDING C{-IAPTER 29 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY ' CODE �ELATING TO FEES, AND AMENDING CHAP7ER 11, SECTION � 11�1� OF THC FRIDLEY �ITY �07E • � , . AND ' RECEIVING GOM�IUNICATION FROM FRIDLEY UNITED P'�ETHODTST CHURCH � � �� , � � � � � � � � � � � � �� . 1 — 1 D Also Received communica�ions in opposition from Redeemer Lutheran Church Woodcrest Baptist Church, and Petition No. 20-1978 from Fridley Covenant ' Church . . Item tabled. Staff to review for possible ainendmei�t along the line of issuing ' a license or permit for a 4 or 5�day period at a.time. � CE ACTIOIV NCEDED: Review Ordinance and bring back with recommendations regarding issuing license or permit for 4 or 5 day per�ods. Put on agenda of October 16, 1978 . FINANCE Q CONS I DERAT I 01� UF F I RST t�EAD I NG � QF AN ORD I NAfdCE ��MEND I NG CHAPTER �0�. OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF rRIDLEY t�ELAT I NG TO THE I�iUN I C I PAL OPERAT I ON OF �LI C�UOR ��.�� Z� '� F Adopted on first reading ACTION NEEDED: Put back on next regul.ar agenda for second reading. 0 0 ,. 1 ��f� BUSIi��ESS �CONTINUED) �ECEIVING THE i'�INUTES OF THE PLAtdNING �Oh1P�YSSTON ' s � � I'�EETI NG �OF �qUGUST 23, �.�� . � � �� . � � � � � � � 3 - 3 I'� l. Discussion on Problem Quilding Sites. ...... ... .... 3E - 3F ; � Planning Comm. Recommendation: Require attachment • (• to deed stating specific problem I . Council Action Reqiaired: Consideration of recommenda- �ion ; . i Item tabled.and referred to.City,A�tarney for review. , UBLIG WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Bring back to City Council after review and recommendations from City Attorney 2. Human Resources Commission P1eeting of August 3, 1978 Paratrans�t......... ............................... 3G . Human Resources Comm.�Recommendation: Qne bus be � ' equipped for handicapped � . � Council Action Reguired: If paratransit program is implemented, prov.ide one bus for handicapped NO ACTION TAKEN. To be considered in conjunction with Faratransit Proposal � � (Item No. 4) 3. Appea7s Commission Meeting of August 15, 1978 Ramona Boisvert; 534 Fairmont.......... ..........._ 3H - 3L Appeals Comm. Recommendation: Approve (Objec�tion �& 3M � � • by neighbor � � Council Action Reqtaired: Consideration of recommenda- tion � ' � � Tabled indefinitely at petitioner's request. UBLIC WORK ACTIOPJ NEEDED: If request would come before the Council again, please notify Mr. Swanson, who objected to the variance. � CONSIDERATION OF PARATRANSIT PROPOSAL� � � . � � � � � � . 4 - 4�I� Tabled to Council Meeting of September 25, 1978 . IC WORK ACTION NEEDED: Put back' on next regular agenda . �'�� BtfSI;'��ESS �CONTIiVUED) � CONS I DERATI ON OF CL.AI M OF IZ � C� f'�CCULLOCH FOR DAMAGE ,' , . TO ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES IN HIS HOME'AT 1516 ��INDEMERE . DRIVE �l,E. , , , , , , , , , � , , , , , , . , ,. , , , , � ,� 5 Staff to investigate background oi� Claim BLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDFD: Invest�gate circumstances for future ac�ion �nd respond back � for the agenda of September 25, 1978 CONS I DERATI ON OF ��EAPPROVA�L OF P'�UNN � S fi I LLCREST � ADDITION (P, S e �'7�-05) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 6 — 6 E Request tabled for two weeks. Continue hold on building permits for the � five lots. � ' BLIC 4JORKS� ACTION NEEDED: Put bacic.on next regular agenda � a CONSIDERATION OF P�AMING AUDITOR FQR 7HE YEAR I9�a � • AND �RECETVING LETTER FROM THE GEORGE %�I� fi�N�EN C0� �� %— 7 E Named George M. Hansen Company as audi.tor and request they finish their audit according to the ne�� state law deadlines. . INANCE ACTIQN�NEEDED: Inform George M. Hansen Company of Council action � RESOLUTION N0. 81-1978 CONSIDERATION OF C0�9MUNIC/�TION TO FOURMIES, FRANCE INQUIRING ABOUT THEIR INTEREST IN �OINING IN SISTER .. CITY PROGRAM � . � , � . � . � . � � � � � � � � � � � . � S Resolution P�o. 81-1978 adopted Authorizing the Initiation of a. Sister City Proqram Between the City of Fourmies, France and the�City of Fridley ITY MANAGER ACTION NEEDED: Forward communication to Fourmies France_to inquire about their interest in program ' . BLI C WOR BLIC G 1`i�i+� BuS��r�SS �COhTIf�UEt�) CONSIDERATIQN OF SIGN iL.ANS FOR JHOR�VJOQD SN�JPF'ING CENTER, i�ICE PLAZA, fiOLLY SHOPPING CENTER AND �SBORNE ROAD SHOPPING CENTER� � � � � � � � � � '� � � � � � � All Sign Plans approved ACTION P�EEDED: Inform applicants of councii action . � P�GE � „ 9-9P RECEIVING PETITIOi� t�l�-l�%� i�EQUESTING IMPROVEP�ENT OF ALLEY BETWEEN 59TH AND bUTN I�VENUES RND BETWEEN, �y�AIN STREET AND ZND STREET � AND CONSIDERATION OF A �iESOLUTION ORllERING PRELIMItdARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIP�1ATES QF THE COSTS - . THEREOF : STREET IMPROVE[��iENT PROJECT ST ��.��-1.► QDDENDUf�I ��G � � AND � � CONSIDERATION OF A ZESOl�UTION f�ECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC NEARING ON 7HE i'�ATTER OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: STREET It�1PROVEf1ENT PROJECT ST � I9%a-l. aDDENDUM �o � � � � � � � � � � � � � . . . � Petition Received • Resolut7on No. 82-7978 aclopt�d (Order Prel Plans) Resolution IVo. 83-1978 adopf:ed (Call Public Hearing) ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized ,10-1�E CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTI��IATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF; $TREET IMPROVEMENT PROJE.CT ST. 1979-1 aND 1979-� ��1SAS � AND 197 �-4 CSAf� , , , � , , � , , �, , , , . , . � , . , , . , . , ll - 11� A Resolution No. 84-1978 adopted with addition of Arthur Street. from D1ississippi Street to Camelot.Lane AC7ION NEEDED: Amend reso�ution as adopted and proceed as authorized � FUBL PAGE _b �`�FFTI NG. SEPTEMi3ER �1. 19%� _ ____ -- ------------ f`�E�� iis�i`iESS �CaNTINLED) � ' CONSIDEZa7IQN OF A i�ESOLUTION ��EQUESTING .STATE OF i-1INNESOTA DEPART��1ENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO TURP�I Bt�CK TO �ITY OF FRIDLEY �URISDICTI01� �CRTAIN ��IGH- wAY FRONTAGE {;oi��s, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , I2 - 12 B � Resolution No. 85-1978 adopted ' ACTIOPJ NEEDED: Proceed as authorized � � � .• CONSIDERATION OF A t�ESOLUTION f`�UTHORIZING TRF,NSFERS . FROM TNE PUBLIC UTILITY FUND AND THE ;��VOLVING FUND TO >'�-�� s�ATER t'�ORKS IMPROVEMENT �OND FUND� ��1�TER i�EFUNDING BONDS OF 1975 FuND, IMPROVEMENT �ONDS OF � � 1963 FuND, ANB SPECIAL aSSESSh1ENTS�ZEFUNDING �ONDS oF19G4, , , , , , , , , , , ; , � . . ,�, . , , , . , , 13-13B Resolution No. 86-1978 auopted INANCE ACTIOf� NEEDED: Praceed as authorized .� � 0 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING.FUNDS FROf�I TiiE �EGt1LAR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Fl1ND TO THE CAPITAL ' IMPROVEMENT FUND � � � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � � � � 14 , Resolution No. 87-1978 adopted INANCE ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized . m �INAiVCE FINAPdCE 0 �. �ITY MANAGER i�E�� II�1�SS ��ONTINUED) n CONSIDERATIO�d OF A RESOLUTION DIRECTIfJG PREPARATIOfJ OF THE FISVAL �SSESSMENT i�OLL. FOR TRE�,TMENT A�lD .� r�EMOVAL OF TREES (1973) , , , � , . , � , , , , , , , . , 15 - 15 A Resolution Pdo. 88-1978 adopted � ACTIOPd fdEEDEU: Pro�eed as authorized 0 CONSIDERATION OF A�'ESOLUTIOiV DIRECTING PURLICATION OF HEARING ON THE PZOPOSED ASSESSMENT �OLL FOR TNE '' TREATPIENT AND �'EP10VAL OF TREES C1��.�) � � � � � � � � � � lb - 16 A Resolution No. 89-1978 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized � CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLU7ION I�UTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAI N SURPLUS PROPERTY � � � � � � � � � � � � � � '� � � .i% Resolution No. 90-1978 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION �PPROVING AND aUTHORIZING $IGNING THE aGREEP1ENT ESTABLISHING ;^IORKING CONDITIONS, �'�AGES AND'IIOURS OF Eh1PL0YEES OF THE C,ITY OF FRIDLEY POLICE DEPARTMCNT �OR TNE YEARS 1g%6 AND 1977� ��.. �' Resolution No. 91-1978 adopted with additional stipulation as discussed ACTION NEEDED: Execute Police Contract witi� additional stipulation 18 - 18 BB �. 11BLIC WORKS GULAR ��EE7ING, SEPTEMBER 11� 1�%� PAGE � iJE!J �USii`�CSS �CONTINiJED) ' COfVSIDERATZON OF A REPORT ON i�IARKET STUDY FOR THE DOWN- � � TOWN i�CV I TA! I ZAT I �N �ROGRAh1 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 1g Received report and authorized s±aff to prepare consultant proposal ACTIOfV NEEDED: Prepare cansultant praposal as outlined to C�uncil and put ac on � ageiida of Se�tQmber 25, 1978. . �LAIMS � � � � � � � �� 2� Approved � � IrJANCE ACTION ��dEEDED: Pay claims as approved � LICENSES, , �, ,� , , , , , , , , , ,, , , , , , , , , , � , 21 - 21 E �' Approved ' � � INANCE ACTION NEEDED: Issue licenses � � V . . ESTIMATES � � . � . . � � � . � � � � � � . � � � � � � � ZZ Approved � � INANCE ACTION NEEDED: Pay estimate � . �ITY MANAGE APPOINTMENT iCITY Eh1PL0YEE)� � � � �� . � � • • � � � Zj Appointment of Sidney C. Inman as Accounts & Budget Officer at $1560 a month, effective Sept. 25, 1978 approved . ACTION NEEDED: Inform accountin� of new City Employee • 0 ADJOUR;V : 12:00 Midnight REDEE�t1ER L�1�T� ERAl� CH U RCH 61 N. E. MISSlSSIPPI WAY • FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE: 5fi0-3069 Arnold M. Stone, Pasto� • LeRoy Erlandson, Associate Pastor Sep�embe�c y, 1 Q18 C.i�y Counc.i.2 C i,ty a � �n.i.d�e y 6431 UrLi.v¢ha.i,ty Avenue N. E. Fni.d,�e y, M�,nne.e o�a. 5 54 3 2 �ecvc S.vr.b : By unan.i.mou.a ac�ion o� �he Chunch Counc,i.e a,t .ixa negcceatc mee�,i.h.g o� Sepzembelc �, �q78, �'he cong�c2g�,t,i.an a� Redee�n2n. Lu,the�r.an Cduvick, 61 Mi,�a.i.da.i.pp.� GJay N.�., w�i.,ahea �o be an necand .i.n. appaa.�t,i.an �a �he ,?,i,.cer�.<.n.g and u,ae o� gamb..e..i.rcg dev.i,c.e,� .i.►a. �he c,i.t y o��c.i.dee y. The C.i,ty Counc.i.e .i..a neque,a�ed �a ne�ec� �he pnopoaed oncf,i.nance wh,i.ch wo�d am2nd Cl�ccp�e�c 29 and Chap�eJc 11, .aee�',t.an � i.10 ab �he �tc.i.d.2ey C.i.ty Code �a pen- m.i.t �h.e .F,i.cen,a.�.ri.g and .au6a eque►�►x ua e a� gamb.Q,i.ng de.v�i.c.e�.. _ S.i.n.c¢�r.2Zy, edeemefc Chwcch Counc.i.� Jame,a B ood, SecJc y aapus: Academy Pre-K - 12 � Deai Ministry � 8us Ministry - # Sunday Radio Broadcas: 1 i:3? - 12:30 KN1 V - 108 xa;�� - ;��o * Faiin Promis� Missicn=rv Progra� * Dynan:.. Youth Progr ,. * Soui %'�� 1 Cl!11 ^ � Em;,�_s � * tndzpe- _ � .. Prpm _- �a Fu.^.C� - , -. S�^�r..� s: {� �� l� �� f� 1� �1� 1�3A�, i�1� l� �1� +� 1�--� ��J !� �� I�--# � � 6875 University Ave. N.E. ! Minneapolis, Minn. 55432 � Phone (812) 571-6409 Clarke S. Poorman, M.A., D.D., Pasto� Vic Shepard, B.R.E., BusJViaitatiost Pastor Charles Surrett, M.R.E., M.Dir., YouthlMusic Pastor John Sherman, S.D., WBA PtinCip�i Cit;� o.� � ri�lYy E43� 'J:�? v pr�it� r ve . N. :. Fridley, 2`�.n:�esota 55432 Sept. 7, 19'7$ Dear Sirs, � I appr�ciat� ;�our Ietter informin� us of ths Council nesting Sep��?��r ' 1, 9 g78 and .the item on the 8.g2RC�3 co�cerning ths ].icensing o�' Ua*�bli�g d�vices. I do have som? input a-�d sha1l be p*esent at tha :r.eeting or� thp ��Eh to share my cor.viction� and the concern of the fu.nd�.menta2 C�ristian ca�r�unitf h�re in �'ric?le;� regarcing ihis t3ropos3l. r� • _ �.._ �ralY, �ir��lfi�l� . �`i'sr/'P�•+�r""' CZar�ce ?�crma.n, i a�tor � A GROWI�IG IOCAL CHUiiCH 1411N1STFiY WHERE THE BIBLE, TkE BIOOD, AND THE BLESSED HOPE IS FA17F}FULLY PROCLAiMED 0 � 0 FRIpLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN NAME ADDRESS DATE: September 11, 1978 TTEM NUMBER ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- y 2 ----------- -- ��i%�f�-�"�v'r1,� %�, �D�i' �� Q� '" ,�//S' � ..�5" z � - �% �'�N � � � � � _�� ' s- r �' ��zU- �i?�,� � _. . - _-, _. � ->� � _ _ I _ . - - __ -. � . . - - , _:: ,�. _ _ - - . �.,,.: ; -. Y : µ - _ � T -_ : :- ; --� �.t.,,,�.. -.�- � ----� . . ,- �, _ _, ; _.- ::. - : ... - _.. _ ._. _. . . "' y . '>:�. _' I _-�r�.�-r-r-�r�s-,y �...►..�.►��.�rs-.�-.��-.-f;r-i�r�i't�li�w.c-s1r=��ytti--i�-t,o-�rii.�t-iF�w�rs-�=r-s+�+-�srs•virtirrri-.4��.+-s��+rti-a��=�i.rra��st��.�._ ,�� _ _ . , � � � '- ' y:' �- : - �- ., - i- ' ' .. ..=..; , — - .��•�.�n .l,t3..' _ ._ - __. ._. _.. � �.� -�_. ..,.... , -- : _ . _-:_ .: �T. � ' �. _.r :� , , .. .� � .. . r: _ . _. - - _ - _- - � �'� _ ' � -'`*°q � 7 ' � , --�, ,�-� s� . _ - , � We, the undersigned _ residents of Fridley,_.are opposed to__the _passage__of any__�___ ____ bi11 that would legalize gambling_in the city of Fridley. NAME ADDRESS -- — --- — -- --- ------- - ---� � - ---__. - --- - -- - --- �.,._ __� _ _-_ � -_ _- ---: � --� ---d9�% --- C��.� � �.�.,�� __ ��' �%� . �° .��-- r-,��'� > '' /, , _ _-- __ _ _��__ F'°^�-- �-------- ; :, , , � --.C�_ �� __--- - -- : �✓�- �- - - � -- ---__ :_. � -- ' _ ; --- _ � � • ��' � i� - -� -�a-iv�'_ � o�°�.e,� � - -- __ __��-J --�� - -- --- - - • � 9'�Z_r�'��'r�_�i'�?�'� �i!�c..� -- -��a,._�.c�, __�2.2�ih �ncccp . . _ --- ��s�--��'=�-°-��-- �_ _S� s2--_ �� 5 -�"� ec_� ( _ ---- ---.. ---5-�._-,_,�•�.. ��.�.----�---- � . � . _ __. ' _ �;__��; _ ��-�.�--��--� - -- - _. _ _ _ _ ._ ----- - ---- -- _ , -� f � � ��..1�.._�..� �--�-�-�� - � � ��'� ` .__-- -- � �---- - •-�.G � ��.,:,-- __ _-- _ . :. �i- ��..�.._-- ----- _ ::. _ � _ ��. � _ -- ^ ; �� % I _ i � - . -� � I ��.� �� --.-� -_ -- '� � � /,�-��....t..� ,� ��__�_:,� _ ;, ' _ _.1 �-��-�_�1_.—� sdf T�-��. ��--�i. �� /�o - � �'-��"� . �t. c� . _ '�- f--�l (�- —'�� -��~ � e _ � r �jC _� _ _. � �� _��-- �-- �---- __--_ - -� s%-- �-�.� �.----- G �o� i9 �8 --- -- `� - - -- -- � _��/__ __� ��`' ��_--- --- --------.__ - . �G i :__`1 �.�.�..,�� [,�.�__%� ��__ i G 1-�- % -- '�- ---- _---_-- ��, _ _, . � � � �� _ _- - - _ _ _ -- --- -- r------- _ --- _ , 8�/ Q�uc-� ,�_. S�_ � _ __.� _-------- . . ,Z 3 i N_ � . ,-d2��y� � ; , , . '1 L^'�— F �_ � ' ' !� ; �..,�. 7� � Ts ? s t Y/At r"ri-..,.ro u— .. �. 4 +r Zy+. � ��.",_�rA3LV ..y3iasy�sSr++Y-�f1[� ,�';p""�� . '".�.� y . ' u . i �`� - x .•i ' ?' � � F YJ'y 'a !� ��._��Tr� t - . .: �. '; 1 ? �h.M� {�� y.p � /wa � J > . _ C: ,•� �s' C. ��1 - ' _. . .r .:4 . F r '�"ri �, C ..'S � ,f G -' , 7. �y � d 7 4 �.14 Y � �/�^ �': 0' . , �r �. . .. �. Y � �� 1� . � � � ._� ,. _� �v :r` _ ' : . , :� fs _ ;;`., "•�� •� 6390 UNIVERSITY AVENUE NORTHEAST � FRIDLEY, MINNESO'CA 55432 _ r ��.�� :� �� r- ;, _ '- p.4�'-�-�...9"�,f �..,... _.. . t_ � .:,. � _ � ... . _ e.. v ....- . .. .. __.� _. ... . ._ ..'. . . . . . J�.... .._. . . ..... .. . .. . . � .. . . .. � . . . . ',.. � . . ♦ THE MINUTES OF TNE REGULAR COUhCIL MEETING OF r � TNE FRIDIEY CITY COUIYCIL OF AUGUST 7, 1978 i� � THE MINUTES Of THE REGULAR t+IEETING OF TNE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUST 7. 1978 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was'called to order at 7:32 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLED6E OF ALLEGIANCE: � j Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PR�SENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Hamernik, Councilman Schneider and Councilman Barnette MEMBERS ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: PUBLIC HEARING MEETING, JULY 17, 1978: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes of July 17, 1978 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting• aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTIdN by Councilman Barnette to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. DPEN FORUM, VISITORS: �� 7here was no response from tt�e audience under this item of business. NEW BUSINESS: GONSIDERATION OF SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR 1979 BUDGET ON SEPTEMBER 18, 7978• � MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the proposed 1979 budget from the City Manager. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all a�oting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 'MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on the budget for 5eptember 18, 1978. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �tECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 26, 1975: ROBERT NELSON, SP #78-06, 524 RICE CREEK TERRACE: Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated this is a request for a special use permit to allow a second accessory building at 524 Rice Creek Terrace. The Planning Cottxnission did hold a public hearing and reca�nended approval (' of this request with the stipulations that the garage be located at the t southeast corner of the rear let with access off of 68th Avenue and that all easement and setback requirements be met and that the alignment of the second accessory building be as close as possible with the abutting prop- erty owners structure, without causing undue hardship on the Retitioner. �--------- Mr. Sobiech stated, it should be pointed out, there were num�rous objections from surrounding property owners regarding this request for a second access- ory building. Mr. Nelson, the petitioner for the special use permit, appeared before the Council and stated he recently purchased the house at 524 Rice Creek Terrace and, although it does have an attached garage, extra storage space is needed 18� � 18� REGUt.AR MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1978 PAGE 2 as he has three automobiles, two motorcycles, bicycles, a snowblower and lawr.movrer. He stated he would tike to keep these items housed inside and this is not possible with his present garage. Counci7man Har�ernik asked P1r. Nelson if he had given consideration to ex- panding the existing garage. Mr. Nelson stated he has, but it is quite close tc the lot line, and the garage was built short of the.roof line. He also stated there is a large slab irt the back which they use as a patio and he felt it wouTd be easier and more economical to put up a second structure. Mr. Richard Larson, 506 Rice Creek Terrace, stated he lived directly across the street from Mr. Nelson and felt construction of the accessory building would detract from other properties and have an effect on the vaivation and asthetics of the area. He felt a precedent would be set, if the special use permit is granted, and didn't think it was in keeping with the neigh- borhood as it presently exists. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Larson if he would feel differently if the structure was attached to the house, possibly on the en� toward 68th Avenue. � Mr. Larson stated he was not sure how this would fit in with the house so it would be difficult to answer. He stated he would not be pleased with a driveway that would open toward his property. t�rs. Barbara Hughes, 548 Rice Creek Terrace, indicated she was concerned about the noise. She also stated she would like any garage opening to be on 68th Avenue and not Rice Creek Terrace. Mr. Sobiech stated, as far as the noise, it is his understanding that the accessory building is mostly for storage, but that Mr. Neison may do some work on the family car in the building. He stated, if the noise got to a point where it was a pub7ic nuisance, the City would monitor the situation. • Mrs. Hughes pointed out tfiere are State regulations regarding noise control and they can be enforced. Mayor Nee stated tie felt the State regulations indicate the noise has to be at a certain level over a period of time and felt the noise Mrs. Hughes was reierring to wasn't prohibited by the State. Mr. Q. G. Zaivislak, 497 Rice Creek Terrace, pointed out there already is a double garage on the property and was wondering why Mr. Nelson purchased the house if he needed more storage. Mr. Dan Gourde, 6800 7th Street, indicated his concerns are the same as Mr. Larson's. Ne feit by aiiowing this second accessory building, it wouid set a precedent to allow other persons in the City to request a second garage. Ne felt they would also be destroying property values in the neighborhood and another driveway would be added just north of his property. He felt this would be a detriment if he wanted to sell his property. Mrs. Marlene Knight, 513 Rice Creek Terrace, stated when they purchased their house in October, their title stated there were to be no unattached yarages in the cor,munity. She stated, therefore, they purchased their home with the understanding that they couldn't put up another garage. Mr. Uowie Bouma, 525 Rice Creek Terrace, stated he has been a real estate broker for 16 years and is wel] aware of the effect this second accessory building would have on the neighborhoad. He stated the homes in this area range from $60-$90,OOU and if you start adding double garages up and down the street, it would have an adverse effect on each and every property. He indicated he would be in favor of rejecting the request for the special 1 189 REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1978 PAGE 3 use permit. Mr. Nelson stated there are other detached garages on Rice Creek Terrace and he personally feels it would be better to have another garage than to have items sitting in the driveway. He s�tated he'moved oui of his home in Columbia Heights because he ran out of room and spent time looking for property where he could put up another garage. He stated he talked with the realtor and someane at City Hall and was told this vaas acceptable. , Mr. Nelson stated one of the main reasons for purchasing this home was because he needed the extra room and felt he could add on. Mr. Nelson �� stated he didn't come in to the neighborhood to put a blight un anyone, but felt storing items outside are worse than having the accessor•y building. Mr. Neison stated he isn't aware of any covenants in his abstract of tit�e which would prohibit him from building the accessory building. Mayor Nee questioned the nature of the covenants in Mrs, Knight's title. Mrs.Knight stated, when their attorney examined the title, there was a paragraph that was very specific as to what you could or could not do as far as unattached garages. Co�^�i�man Rarnette asked if the residents would have the same objections, if Mr. Nelson merely built a storage building, with no driveway. Mr. Larson stated, speaking on his own behalf, it would depend on the � location, size and design of the structure. He stated he would not find it as undesirab7e particu]arly if it was a smal]er structure and didn't have the driveway and a large garage door. ; Mrs. Hughes siaied she would have no objections to a storage building, as long as it faces on 68th and there is no noisy activity. She indicated, however, there are a lot of places to store off-season vehicles other tlian on your own property. �Mr. Gourde stated he would have no objections to a storaye shed. Ne stated y this would eliminate the driveway and wouldn't be as large as the'accessory building proposed by �1r. Nelson. Councilman Hamernik stated a number of the neighbors expressed a concern about the comment at the Planning Commission regarding the burden of proof for denial of the special use permit. t�r. Doug Klint, acting City Attorney, stated the City doesn't have the initial burden of proof as it is on the applicant to show that his request for the special use permit complies with the requirements of the City Code. He statcd the petitioner would have to show that the application would - not adversely effect the safety and general welfare of the neighbarhood. He stated, from this point, the �urden is on the City for showing a��eason for denying the special use permit. Mr. Doug Klint stated the courts have shown that mere aesthetic reasons are not sufficient for denial. Councilman Hamernik stated, at this point, the Council has testimony from a person who is a reai estate broker regarding property values, although they don't have any official testimony from an appraiser on his evaluation of the situation. He stated there were a number of comments regarding a precedent being set concerning second accessory buildings which he agrees does create some concern in his mind. He stated he didn't really feel the City was planned with fihis in mind, that is, putting up second accessory �' buildings on every lot. He felt this would be a great detraction from the � area, if this took place. Councilman Hamernik felt the proper way to approach this would be for an ordinance change so that there was adequate control. Mayor Nee thought the ordinance is'clear that it is prohibited. Mr. Sobiech, Publis Works Director, stated this is permitted with a special '� use permit, and prohibited without the special use permit. i � 190 � REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1978 PAGE 4 Councilman Hamernik stated his point in bringing this up for discussion is that the general public probably has a misi7terpretation as to how the ordinance reads, as he felt they interpret it as being acceptable, without the special use permit. Mayor stated he generally agrees with Mr. Nelson that it would be favorable to get the vehicles under cover and stored inside. He stated this is why the question was raised of extending the garage in order to obtain the needed space. Councilman Barnette asked if the City can really say, by adding this accessory building, if it would lower the value of homes around this property. Mr. Doug Klint, City Attorney, stated the Council would have to be the final judge and wei�gh the gvi:dence. �� Councilman Fitzpatrick stated they have been told aesthetics are not sufficient reason for denial, but diminuation of the value would be, yet the diminu- ` ation depends on the aesthetics. I Councilman Hamernik stated, at this point, he is in the position to reco►�enend denial, however, if the petitioner feels, for any reason, he would like action delayed, he would give this consideration. Mr. Nelson indicated he could see no reason for Council to delay action on the request. • MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to deny SP #78-06, as filed by Mr. Robert Nelson, 524 Rice Creek Terrace, on the grounds that the addition of a second auxiliary storage structure, such as proposed, would have a diminutive effect on the area which has been maintained and a precedent would not be set by denying this request. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Cour,cilman Schneider clarified that they are not allowed to cortsider the aesthetics of the situation, but if the adverse effects diminish property values, then this can be considered as a reason for denial. Mr. Doug Klint, City Attorney, stated it is a very close legal question and the reason for denial would have to be determined by the Council. In this case, he stated, the fact that the Planning Committee recorrrnended approval should be given considerable vreight. UPON A VOICE VOTE, a11 voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilr�an Barnette praised the Nelsons' motives, and hoped something could. be worked out so that they could get things inside a storage area. Mayor PJee stated he also shared Councilman Barnette's feelings and hoped som2 other alternative could be worked out. Councilroan Hamernik stated he was cancerned to the degree that he is wondering, in 5earching the ordinance> if perhaps Mr. Nelson wasn't misled. He felt the Planning Commission should review the ordinance for possible clarifica- tion. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to recommend that staff bring this ordinance before the Planning Cormnission for their review and further discussion for possible rewriting for clarification. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ROD WAARA EDINA REALTY• L.S. #78-04, 140 CHARLES STREET: t�r. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated this is a request for a lot split for a parcel of property in the southwest corner of East River Road 191 REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1978 PAGE 5 and Charles Street. He stated the Pjanning Commission recommended approval of the lot split with the following sti�,ulations: (1) five foot easements along ail sides of Parcels A and B and (2) 20 foot easement along the east portion of Parcel 6 to be used as bikeway/walkway easement as well as utility and drainage easements. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commissfon and approve L.S. #78-04 with the stipulations o,f five foot easements along all sides of Parcels A and B and the 20 foot easement along the east portion of Parcel B to be used as bikeway/walkway easement as well as utility and drainage easements. Seconded by Gouncilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MORATORIUM ON LOT DEVELOPMENT ON L6TS IN INNSBRUCK NORTH 2ND ADDITION LOTS 4, 5, ANQ 6, BLOCK 2 AND LOTS 5, 6, AND 7, BLOCK 3� Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated the Planning Commission discussed development on lots that have been previously desiynated as "wet�ayids" by the D�partment of Natural Resources. He stated the Environmental Quality Commission has recarr�rencled a moratorium on development of these lots and passed this recommendation on to the Planning Commission. Mr. Sobiech stated he has been in contact with the Department of Natural , Resources and they indicated the City should be receiving additional in- formation regarding development of these lots. He felt that perhaps the " original Type III wetlands designation was made with the assumption that ', this development did not have a functioning storm sewer system. He stated, � about six months ago, the appropriate data the City has regarding �he storm sewer system in the area and how it fanctions, was forwarded to the De- Partment of Natural Resources and they are in the process of reviewing this material. ; Mr. Sobiech stated a building �ermit has been issue�, and app•rupria�te notice given to the D.N.R, for Loi: 4 of Block 2. Mr. Sobiech stated, as � of now, no building permits have been issued for Lots 5 and 6 of Block 2. Fui°ther, the Department of Natural Resources has issued permits on Lots 4, 5, 6, znd 7 alock 3, and the City has issued building permits for all the lots in Slock 3. Mayor Nee pointed out that on Lot 4, Block 2, the D.N.R. hasn't issued a permit and yet the lot is being filled. He �questioned if the D.N.R. ; has been told there is activity on Lot 4. t4r. Sobiech stated they have ' been informed. �' I Councilman Schneider noted on Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, there is illegal filling taking place. Mr. Sobiech stated that was correct and the City has been in contact with those property owners. i Councilman Schneider questioned if the filling of ihose lots creates any additional flood potential or nutrient problem with the run-off. � Mr. Sobiech stated the Innsbruek storm sewer took into account the develop- , ment of all those properties, artd the Rice Creek Watershed District approved ' the storm sewer system. I Councilman Schneider stated the City is apparently at the point where the Department of Natural Resources is saying, in their opinion, the storm I�� sewer system is not adequate and in the City's opinion, it is adequate. �' � He questioned if, in fact, there was flooding in the basements of the homes � in that area. Mr. 5obiech stated the City hasn't received any complaints about basement flooding. He stated the D.N.R, has asked for appropriate data regarding the storm sewer system and the design criteria used and perhaps the City would have additional information from them in the next fe,� weeks. ' � Ms. Lee Ann Sporre, member of the Environmental Quality Comnission, stated 192 REGULAR I�IEETING QF AUGUST 7, 1478 PAGE 6 she wished to call on Mr. Messerli to speak to the Council as he is a resident in this area. Mr. A1 Messerli, 5505 W. Danu6e Road, stated he lives adjacent to the two wetlands in question. He stated he thinks the Council is aware of the history of this area and how the assessments were put on to the lots in the area. Ne stated the explanation they had was there was some question if some of these lots would be buildable. . Mr. �Aesserli stated, last year, the D.N.R, did state that the lots were Type III wetlands and public waters. He stated it was pointed out the D.N.R, did not know about the storm sewers and believes this is in error as the D.N.R, made a study of the storm sewers. Mr. Messer�li stated the most recent thing that arought up th.is issue again is that there is extensive filling going on at these lots. He stated truckloads of bad fill material was being dumped, without building permits. Mr. Messerli referred to an article in the paper which stated that Minnesota was losing Federal funds becaus? their method of retaining wetlands was not up to date. He stated this was of concern to him. He felt the D.N.R. was not taking the action they should to protect the wetlands, and feit there are some lots that are worth preserving. He thought perhaps the Rice Creek Watershed District may even have some second thoughts and in- dicated he would not like something to happen again like is happening to Moore Lake. ' Councilman Schneider stated he shared Mr. Messerli's concern in the area. He pointed out the State has legal authority that should he enforced at the State level. He scated he has some questions of the legality of imposing a one year moratorium on development in that area, or• for that matter, any other area. He felt, at this point, he would like to see the addi±ional information from the Department of Natural Resources and would lilce the City Attorney to review the model ordinances and legality of pro- pusing a moratorium on construction. He thought perhaps the City could l. hold off issuance of any building permits for two weeks until a report � is received. Councilman Schneider felt, however, the dumping of fill should be stopped .. � as he felt it was in violation of existiny City and State ordinances. Mr. Messerli stated this fill was being done daily for the last several months. He stated the sand casting was bulldozed and buried and they are now hauling dirt on top of that. He pointed out those lots that were being filled don't have building permits and stated Lots 4 and 5, Block 2, were being fiilled today. Mr. Sobiech indicated that Lot 4 had a building permit and the property owner had been contacted about not discontinuing filling on Lot 5. Councilman Qarnette asked when Mr. Harstad purchased the lots if they were designated as buildable lots. Mr. Sobiech stated, if he wanted to go through the expense of soil prepar- ation, they would be buildable lots. Ms. Sporre pointed out that judges have ruled over and over that if you buy wetlands, you don't have the right to build on it. 5he stated the State recognizes that wetlands are protected by State law. She stated � what the Cornmission was getting at was an injunction to halt the filling of these lots. She felt the City should ask for an injunction against ) the D.N.R. under the Minnesota Statutes. Councilman Schneider stated Minnesota Statute 105 allows the appeal process, however, you woul� get into a situation where one public body is suing another public body and no matter who wins, the taxpayer loses. ' ' �4ayor Nee stated, if it was as clear as Ms. Sporre suggests, he thinks the REGULA.R MEETI.NG Of AUGUST 7, 1�78 pAG£: 7 Council would have proceeded. He stated the City Attorney advised that the City didn't have the legal foundation in the matter. Ms. Sporre stated they asked for an environmental impact statement and at that ti�, the City Attorney doubted if it was legai. She stated they found it was a very legal process and used effPCtively by the residents. In this case, the citizens are acknowledging the sarne ro]e for the Innsbruck area and asking that they not have to go against their local government to protect what the State )aw provides. She stated if it is necessary to have a class action against the D.N.R., there seems to be sufficient evidence. Councilman Schneider stated this is private land and somewhere along the line the person who owns it has to be compensated. Ms. Sporre stated the State Taw recognizes those wetlands as having over- riding public purpo9e. Mayor Nee stated if a special assessment district was set up that involved the immediate area, which is probably about 73 houses, it 9s possible that the district could buy the land and restore it for possibly a modest cost. He stated, however, what is needed is a petition from over 50% of the aPfected area. He stated an estimate could then be made on what it might cost to restore it and what property owners would be assessed. Mr. Messerli felt this was a possibility, but was concerned about what would be a reasonable assessment. Mr. Messerli pointed out that individuals are encouraged to bring suit where the D.N.R. is not enforcing the law and another point is that the State has available to it several million dollars in federal aid for two programs; one, for the purchase of wetlands and second7y, to pay owners to preserve the wet7ands. He felt if the assessment approach would be the most reasonable, in terms of money, it would be worth pursuing, . Mayor Nee pointed out, of evidence to suggest -r He stated there isn't property and make it a cost. if the City gets into litigation, there is a lot that these lots were intended to be building•sites. any question that the City has the power to condemn natural site and they could get an estimate on the Mr. Messerli stated he would be interested in this approach, if the City feels it is the only approach to take. M07IpN by Councilman Schneider to direct staff to take whatever action is necessary to immediately stop the dumping or filling on all lots, without building permits. Seconded by Councilrian Fitzpatrick. ilpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 'MOTION by Councilman Schneider to not issue any permits for two weeks until staff has time to work up a proposal on the costs for retaining the vacant area. Seconded by Counciiman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, ail voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 'MUTION by Councilman Schneider to refer to the City Attorn�y a copy of the Environmental Protection Model Ordinances for use by local governments and request his opinion on the constitutionality. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jim Langenfeld, Chairman of the Environmental Quality Commission, thanked the Council members for their action. He stated the basic idea they are trying to get across is to make sure the areas being developed are properly reviewed. He explained that was the intention of the request fi'or the moratorium on development. He stated he would appreciate the Council's making a decision on the Interium Development Control Ordinance. He felt there were problems somewhere and someone wasn't doing their job and indicated he would like action taken against the D.N.R. r + I Councilman Schneider stated he shares Mr. Langenfeld's concerns as one of the things that first got him interested in City government was a similar 1�)� /I � 19� I �.----..__ __ REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1978 PAGE 8 situation in his neighborhood. He stated, however, he feels a respon- sibility in guarding the taxpayer's dollar and when another government agency is involved, he feels it is wasteful to overstep the bounds of that agency. He stated the D.N.R. is saying not to issue a permit, and they don't want to risk litigation, but wants the Eity to take action. He stated he hopes it doesn't appear he isn't concerned about the en- vironment. Mr, Langenfeld asked if there wasn't an ordinance indicating what type of fill had to be used. Mr. Sobiech stated they will review the material beiny used for fill. Mr. Sobiech also questioned if the Council's motion on costs for restoring the area included both Blocks 2 and 3. It was the consensus of the Council that staff should look at the total package. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Planning Commissi�n Meeting of July 26, 1978. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upor. a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATIQN OF RE UEST FOP, USE OF LOCKE PARK SOCCER FIELD QY WOODCREST BAPTIST CHURCH RECOMMENDED FOR OENIAL BY PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION): Pastor Poorman of the Woodcrest Baptist Church appeared before the Council regarding their request for use of LocKe Park soccer field. He requested the Council not honor the recommendation of the Park and Recreation Commission who recommended denial of the request. Pastor Poorman explained the use of this field is vital to their athletic program. Mayor Nee felt the concern of the Commission tiaas the church/state conflict. He felt possibly a rental agree�ent raould solve this problem. Pastor Poorman indicated they would be willing to meet this demand. Councilman Hamernik asked when their season would begin and when they would need the fie7d. Pastor Poorman stated they would need the field by August 21, 1978. He also pointed out they would like to use the field for physical education classes. Counciiman Hamernik pointed out the amount of time and hours they are requesting would be in conflict with some of the programs planned by the City. He stated his concern was with the hour5 of 3 to 5 p.m. and 3 to 6 p.m., when the youth would be out of school and possibly utilizing the park area at that time. He stated, therefore, he was somewhat reluctant to enter into a lease agreement with the hours requested. Pastor Poorman stated, if the field was needed, they would use it only for home games and practices. but to eliminate the use entirely he feels would hurt their schedule. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, suggested getting back to the Council in a few weeks and felt if it is a mutually beneficial arrangement, they would try to work something out. MOTION by Councilman Namernik to table this time in order to give staff an opportunity to work out an agreement with tJoodcrest Baptist Church and bring the item back to Council at the earliest possible time, but no later than two weeks. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ,' � _ _ _ _— _ __---- _ __ _ _ . -- - __ � . 1�5 ; REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 7, �978 PAGE 9 I CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO SERVE 3.2 BEER AT NEIGHBORHOOD PARTY AT LOGAN PARK: The Gouncil received a request from Mrs. Rachel'Nee, volunteer for the Logan Park Annual Picnic Committee, requesting use of Logan Park for a � neighborhood party on Sunday, August 20, 1978 between 3 and 10 p.m. or, in the event of rain, permission to hold the picnic on August 21, 1978 from 5 to 8 p.m. Permission was also requested to serve 3.2 beer and for some extra tables. 1� �- MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve this request for use of Logan Park on August 20, 1978 between 3 and 10 p.m. or, in the event of rain, on August 21, 1978 from 5 to 10 p.m. and grant per�nission to serve 3.2 beer and for the Park Department to comply with the request for extra tables. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, ail voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A PROPOSAL FOR A COLLECTION CENTER AND RECYCLABLES: Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated a proposed agreement is before the Council for consideration regarding a recycling center. He stated, since Ms. Metcalf is on vacation, Ms. Steinmetz is present to answer any questions the Council may have. Mr. Sobiech pointed out the Project Committee hasn't had the opportunity to review this proposed agreement and if desired by the Counci], staff would continue to work with them on this matter. ' MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the agreement and direct staff to continue working with the Recycling Committee. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Mr. Brunsell, City Clerk, stated the non-profit organization who will be overseeing the recycling operation can be named as an additionaT insured on the City's policy at a cost of about $50 per year. He stated, however, if they were to take out their own insurance, the cost would be about ` $500 per year. Councilman Schneider 5tated his feeling would be to add them to the City's policy for the �50 per year and have this amount repaid to the City, as opposed to them paying $500 for insurance. He stated he would propose, therefore, that the agreement be reworded to cover this. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor� P�ee de- clared the motion carried unanimously. UTION N0. 71-•1978 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 71-1978. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. LTCENSES- MOTION by Councilman fitzpatrick to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in ihe License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. LICENSES - MICHAEL SERVETUS UNITARIAN SOCIETY: MOTION b.y Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the licenses as requested by the t�ichael Servetus Unitarian Society and waive the fees. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee de- clared the motion carried unanimously. � /, 196 REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 7, 1978 PAGE 10 CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No. 193G21 through 214997. Seconded by Councilman Namernik.' Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, t4ayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMATES: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as submitted below. League of Minnesota Cities 300 Hanover Building 480 Cedar Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Membership dues in the League of Minnesota Cities for y'ear beginning September 1, 197II $5,039.00 Seconded bu Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CLAIM - MR. BOB CALDERON, JR. - 6401 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E.: Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated P1r. Calderon was in attendance earlier in the meeting and had to leave, but ha.s submitted a c1aim for damages to his lawn estimated at $804. The Council felt this should be processed through normal procedures for handling claims. AUJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by'Council- man Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 7, 1978 adjourned at 9:46 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secy. to the City Council Mayor Approved: . � • THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETTNG OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUST 14, 1978 , r _ -� 1�7 l TNE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEA�2ING MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUST l4, 1978 The Public Hearing Meeting of the FridTey City Council was called to order at 7:54 p.m, by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE 4F ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee 1ed the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMQERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Barnette, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Hamernik and Councilman Fitzpatrick MEMaERS ABSENT: None ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Nee requested an item be added to consider a resolution in support of the City of Richfield in their lawsuit regarding the constitutionality of compulsory arbitration provisions of the Employees Labor Relations Act of Minnesota. M07ION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt the agenda as amended. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS: PUBLIC HEARING ON PdUISANCE ABATEf1ENT; HAYtS JUNK YARD: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to open the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee decTared the motiQn carried unanimously and the Public Hearing opened at 7:56 p.m. Mr. Sobiec.h, Public Works Director, stated the properties involved are generally located between 79t1i and 83rd Avenues from Hickor•y Street just east of the Burlington t�orthern raiiroad tracks. Mr. Sobiech, stated that on June 20, 1978 correspondence was directed to the property owners involved which indicated they were in violation of the Zoning Code regarding junk, debris and refuse and were given to July 24, 1978 to abate the nuisance and clean up the properties. He stated, as a result of this June 20 letter, three property owners have cleaned up their properties. The properties that have been cieaned and are now in compliance are Lots 14 and 15, Block 12; Lots 22, 23, 26 and 27 of Block 4, and Lots 16 and 17 of Block 12. Mr. Sobiech stated, on July 27, 1978, correspondence was directed to all the remaitting property owners indicating that a public hearing had been set regarding the abatement of the nuisance. He stated that correspondence was received from Mr. Wyman Smith, Attorney representing Mr. Carl Sorensen, who thought perhaps the City should be the ones to clean up the litter �•, and had concern about whose lots would be charged for any abatement of ! nuisance. %f � Correspondence was also received from Mr. Keith �arson, Vernon Eide and Timothy Eide, property owners of Lots 9 through 22, Block 13, indicating they woutd like to see the City clean up the property and suggested what they felt an appropriate price might be to abate the nuisance. Mr. Sobiech stated the other correspondence was'received from Eldore Olson, who owns Lot 30, Block 5, which indicated she wouid like to see the City abate the nuisance and to keep in mind a fair and just treatment of her property. Mr. Sobiech stated the City did solicit bids from two contractors regarding 198 g PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF AUGU�T 14, 1978 PAGE 2 costs for abatement cf the nuisance. Gallagher's Service, Inc. stated the cost would be $8,70� pius an additional $200 for removal of the dwelling. Park Construction stated the cost would be $20,000. Mr. Sobiech stated, after dfscussion with the bidders, it was the City's opinion that the price differential was the result of the procedures used. He pointed out that 6allagher's has their own dumping site and dumpsters and Park Construction would have to rely on other equipment. Mr, Sobiech stated staff would recommend that Gallagher's be contracted to remove the debris from the site. Mr. Sobiech stated, in preparing costs to the individual property owners, a determination was made regarding the amount of debris and extent of nuisance on each lot. Qased on the ratio of benefit, the lots were color coded regarding the amount of debris on the property and the cost for removal to abate the nuisance. Mr. Sobiech stated the lots shown in "red" would be charged $741.67 per lot; the ones shown in "orange" would be $463.54 per lot; the cnes shown in "yEllow" would be $115.19 per lot; the ones in "blue" would be $55.91 per 1ot and the ones shown as "green" are � the ones that have already been cleaned up. Mr. Sobiech stated this resu1ted in tabulation of the casts for specific property owners who own I lots in the area. He pointed out the minimum a property owner would pay is $55.91 and the maximum is $5,801.71. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to receive the correspondence from Mr. Wyman Smith, representing Mr. Carl Sorensen; the carrespondence from Keith Larson and Vernon and Timothy Eide; and the correspondence from Eldore Olson. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Uoon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared th� motion carried unanimously. Mr. Wymah Smith stated he is not sure the City has a nuisance. He ex- plained this is heavy industrial property and the zoning would allow people, with certain barriers, to have junk on the property. He stated that John Hayes lived there amony this junk and used all these lots. Mr. Smith stated, as he understands the nuisance ordinance, it has to 1 effect the public health and he is not sure a car body on the lots is a health hazard. He stated Park Construction wants to purchase these lots and if the City doesn't do anything, this situation will work itself out. He stated, aesthetically it is bad, but questions if there is a health menace. Ne felt someone would probably pay for the scrap metal and there would be money to be made instead of spending it. Councilman Barnette stated he thought the original complaint came from residents across the tracks on odors and rodents. Mr. 61en Syverson, Route i, Box 104N, Big Lake, Minnesota, stated he had contacted the Hayes people about five years ugo and asked them to please have the junk removed from his property. He stated they said they would if they had a chance to do it. He felt the Hayes people were responsible for cleaning up the property. He stated his attorney stated he could legally take all the junk and put it back on the Hayes property. Councilman Barnette stated he agrees with Mr. Syverson, but that would require a civil suit between him and the Hayes estate. Mr. Sobiech asked Mr. Syverson if he was in favor of getting the property cleaned up. Mr. Syver•son stated he is interested in having the property cleaned up, but didn't feel the property owners sheuld have to bear the cost to clean up the stuff that has been put there by the Hayes people, as he believed just about all of it was theirs. Mayor Nee pointed out the �roposal to clean up Mr. Syverson's property would cost about $2,400 and asked how tie felt about this. PUBLIC HEARING MEETING Of AUGUST 14, 1978 PA6E 3 Mr. Syverso�� felt he didn't really want to pay for it and pointed out, if he was assessed this amount, it would have to be paid off before he could sell his property. Mayor Nee asked if he felt his property was a hazard to children. Mr. Syverson stated, if they are running around barefoot, there is glass and nails around. j Mr. Wyman Smith stated he questioned whether the court would agree there i is any health problem from tires on his lots, as he didn't feel it was a heaith problem. Mr. Walter, 3508 32nd Avenue N.E., Minneapolis, questioned why ihe City let the Hayes people put all the stuff on the lots. lie stated, several years ago, the City told him which was his lot and he and his wife have cleaned it up and he now was told he cleaned the wrong lot. Mr. Sobiech stated Mr. Zgutowicz owns Lot 23 of Block 12 and the cost to c]ean up his lot would be $463.54. Councilman Barnette pointed out the City doesn't have people out at the lots to see who dumped the debris. Mr. Zgutowicz stated the stuff belongs to the Hayes people. Councilman Barnette stated, as he understands, this then becomes a civil suit between the property owners and the Hayes estate. Mr. Syverson questioned, if the lots are cleaned up, what is to guarantee that siuff wo�ldn't again get dumped on the lots. Mr. Sobiech stat�d the problem they have now is that the site attracts people to dump. Ne stated, when it is cleaned up, "no dumping" signs would be posted. Mr. Wyman Smith stated he felt Hayes had been operating illegally all these years as he never had a permit. He stated the police were afraid to go on the property because of the dogs and guns he had. He stated now the City wants to come along and put a$2,400 charge on innocent peopie iQ accomplish something he doesn't think the City needs to do. Mr. Doug Klint, acting City Attorney., stated, by ordinance, the Council does have the right of declaring it a nuisance and abating the nuisance and to recover the cost by civil action or by assessment. He stated the City has the option of going either way. Mr. Warren Johnson, representing Northern States Power, stated NSP has five lots and they want to be good neighbors and do what is right for the area. He stated he sympathizes with the property owners and if there was any way this could be put back on the Hayes estate, he would like to see this done. He stated, if this wasn't possible, NSP would be willing to go along with the proposal of the City for cleaning up the lots at the cost of $656.67. Councilman Barnette questioned if anyone had seen the Hayes people put debris on their properties. Mr. Wyman Smith irrdicated he had. /! �- Mayor Nee asked A1r. Syverson if he felt the tires and wheels were saleable �I to the junk yard. Mr. Syverson felt this was a possibility as the tires � do have rims on them. Mr. Syverson stated he moved a lot of the material back over to the Hayes lots and right now there isn't enough stuff on his property to justify a cost of $2,400 for removal of the debris. Mr. Sobiech pointed out the reason why Mr. Syverson's cost is quite high r is because of the fact that he does own quite a number of lots in the area, and also stated his property is imnediately adjacent to the Hayes property. 199 �� . __ _ _ _. _ . _ _ — _ _ - -- ._. ------ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ (--- . .� U U I i PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF AUGUST 14, 1978 PAGE 4 I Mayor Nee stated, it seems from the standpoint of liability, it is a hazard as it now stands. ' Mr. Syverson stated he doesn't hold the people of fridley responsible in any way for the condition of the land, but holds the Hayes people re- sponsible. Councilman Barnette pointed out the complair,ts he I?ad were on the rodents. He stated this situation gets to be a health hazard. Mr. Wyman Smith asked if pictures were available of his two lots, that is, Lots 22 and 23, Block 5. He was then shown photographs of these lots. He felt there wasn't any health hazard at all, although there were weeds on �he property. t�1r. Smith stated he wouldn't spend $300 to do anything on these lots and felt there might be $10 worth of work and no health menace. I�Ir. Smith felt private enterprise would work these things out, if the lots are put together and sold as one package for industrial use. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he has also received complaints, from persons living across the tracks from this property, and felt it should be cleaned up. He stated, the question in his mind is who should pay for it. He• felt there was a health hazard and the City has received complaints. He stated, in his sense of judgement, he felt the cost should be assessed against the property that caused it. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatric� to receive the bids from Gallagher's Service, Inc. and Park Construction. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voiing aye, Mayor fJee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik tn receive the estimates regarding the potentia7 assessment distributions for the various lots. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Vee de- clared the motion carried unanimously. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this item of business. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to close the Public Hearing. Seconded by Councilman Scnneider, Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee de- clared the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing closed at 8:45 p.m. NEW BUST;�IESS: CONSIDERATIO� OF NUISANCE AQATEt�IENT; HAYES JUi�K YARD: Councilman Hamernik stated now that the property owners know the position of the City, he questioned if they had ariy plans of their own to take action for cleaning up the property. Mr. Syverson stated he has been out to his property the last several weekends trying to clean up and now there are tires again spread around his property. He felt if they could get the Hayes part taken care of, he could take care of his property. ' Mr. Sobiech asked if they could proceed witn the abatement on all areas i where there is an indication that the property owners want the City to 1 proceed, together with the Hayes property and, in the interim, let the ; other property owners abate their nuisances if, in fact, there is some- / thing on the property they coUld sell, this would then give them a chance to do so. Councilman Barnette felt, by cleaning up the Hayes property, it would satisfy most of the surrounding property owners. l_ �f/1 9 PUBLIC HEARING MEETIP�G OF AUGUST 14, 1978 PAGE 5 Councilman Fitzpatrick felt, if the major pile of debris on the Hayes property was taken away, the other property owners could clean up their lots and have them stay that way. Counci1man Barnette asked the property owners if this seemed like a reason- able answer to the problem. Mr. S,�verson felt he would like a little more time given than was in.the original letter. Mr. Sobiech asked Mr. Johnson, who was representing NSP, if they wished the City to proceed. Mr. Johnson stated they would be in favor of this if the cost didn't exceed $656.67. Councilman Hamernik questioned if the structure on the Hayes property would be removed. Mr. Sobiech stated it would and the foundation portion would be filled. Mr. Qoug Klint, acting City Attorney, stated if the City were to encourage a junk dealer to go on private property, he felt the City would be protected, if they first declared the property a nuisance as 1:his would be part of the abatement procedure. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to request staff to draw up a resolution and bring it back at the n�xt Council meeting to include the cleaning up of the Hayes property along with the other properties whose owners desire to have the City clean their property. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Mr. Sobiech asked if it would be best to declare all the properties a nuisance and then allow the property owners who wished to abate the nuisance themselves do so. Mr. Doug Klint felt it should be done in this manner and stated he would work with staff on the resolution. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee de- clared the motion carried unanimously. ION OF REAPPROUAL ON FINAL PLAT; PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION P.S. Mr. Sobiech, Pu61ic Works Director, stated this is an item that was previously before the Council in May of this year where the Council approved a plat and together with that approval, there was rezoning of the southern portion of property. He stated, wh�t remained, was a large M-2 industrial lot. However, since that approval, the Planning Gommission heard a request for a lot split for Lot 3 on this same plat. Together with the lot split, there was also a petition to rezone Lot 3 to M-1. Mr. Sobiech stated, the Planning Commission, at their July 12 meeting, indicated approval of the lot split with appropriate easements and stipulations. He stated staff determined that the plat had not been recorded, as of this date> and felt the lot split could be included in the plat. He stated, therefore, reapproval is requested on final plat; preliminary subdivision P.S. #78-04, East Ranch Estates 3rd Addition, to include this lot split. He stated the rezoning request would come before the Council in September and if denied, the developer would have to build under the M-2 zoning. Mr. Sobiech stated one of the stipulations of the Planning Commission at the rezoning hearing was the developer work with the City to insure proper drainage. He stated they have been in contact with the property ?.O1 ± I 202 PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF-AUGUST 14, 1978 PAGE 6 owner and will use holding or retention ponds and they have the drainage easements on the plat. Mr.• Benson was present representing the developer and he stated Mr. Paschke wanted to develop Lot 3 into two parcels. •He explained there would be one building on the lot and, therefore, they would be utilizing two 7ots for one building. Ne stated it was originally intended to have two buildings, with a common 1ot line, however, there will now only be one 20,000 square foot building on the two lots. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to reapprove the final p1at,,P.S. #78-04, East Ranch Estates 3rd Addition with the revision that Lot 3 be split into two lots, one 1.1 acre lot and one 1.5 acre lot, with the stipulations regarding the drainage easement which is to be included in the final plat. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 72-1978 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 7976-4: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 72-1978. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 73-1973 DIREGTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMEVT ROLL FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PRQJECT ST. 1976-4: MOTIQN by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 73-1978. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deciared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 74-1978 DIRECTING PREPARATiON Of ASSESSMENT ROLL fOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SS N0. 125: MQTION by Counciiman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 74-1978. Seconded � by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee � declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION.NO. 75-1978 DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESS��ENT ROLL FOR. STORM SEWER IMPROV[MENT PROJECT SS NQ. 125: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Reso7ution 75-7978. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor tyee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 76-1978 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 7978 SERVICE CONNECTIONS: MOTION by Counciiman Hamernik •to adopt Resolution No. 76-1978. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee �eclared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 77-1978 DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESS- MENT ROLL FOR THE 1978 SERVICE CONIVECTIONS: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 77-1978. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote,�all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 78-1978 DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION � JUDGES FOR THE SEPTEMBER 12, 1978 PP,IMARY ELECTION: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Reso7ution No. 78-1978. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9 � /� � ._. _ . _ _ __ _ _ . __ _ __ _ __.__ 203 Pl1BLIC NEARING MEETING OF AUGUST 14, 1978 PAGE 7 CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik�to authorize payment of Claims No. 211F22 through 222891. Seconded by Councilman Qarnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, hlayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. UTION N0. 79-1978 IPJ SUPPORT OF THE CITY OF RIC,HFIELD IN THEIR IT REGARDING THE COVSTITUTIONALIiY OF COh1PULSORY ARBITRATION ST(1NS f1F TNF FMPI 11VFF I �Rl1D Dci nTinnic n�r nc r„trninircnrn . I- -- — -- -- - � Mr. Brunsell, City Clerk, stated this resolution is for support of the ` City of Richfield to show that this has an effQct on all municipalities in the State of Minnesota and to indicate that Fridley also has an interest in determining the constitutionality of the law. Mayor Nee stated there is also the question of whether the City wished to contribute to this cause. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if the major cost was to be borne by the League. It was pointed out that the cost would be borne by ihe City of Richfield,� but that the League is collecting the fees from c�ities who wished to support the cause. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated the Council has questioned the amount of money they pay for membership in the League and felt they could pay this out of those fees. He indicated he was noi: anxious to make a monetary contribution. MOTION bv Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 79-1978 in support ' of Richfield's lawsuit, but de1eting Section 2 covering the contribution. � Seconded by Couneilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor ' �. Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � ; ADJOURNMENT: • ; MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Ccuncil- man Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared � the motion carried unanimously and the Public Hearing Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 14, 1978 adjourned at 9:18 p.m. , , Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee . ; Secy. to the City Council Mayor ', Approved: _ ___ �' 0 THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY GITY COUNCIL OF AUGUST 21, 1978 �04 TNE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETIN6 OF THE FR:DLEY CITY COUN�IL OF AUGUST 21, 1978 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Counci] was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Barnette, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Hamernik and Counc�lman Fitzpatrick MEMBERS ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: REGULAR MEETIHG, JULY 24, 1978: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes of the July 24, 1978 Regular Meeting as presented. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. , ADOPTION OF AGENDA: �ouncilman Schneider asked to add as the firsi item of new business consideration of Zoning Ordinance Amendment ZOA �78-05 by Gerald G. Johnson. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt the agenda as amended. Councilman Schneider ser.onded the motion. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting, aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: There was no response from the audience under this item of business. PUBLIC HEARINGS: PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING ORDINANCE AMENUME�T�ZOA #78-05, BY GERALD G. JbHNSON. .E. r,nv n��caviivu rc�iiiviviYV. io-ly/u t'KUItJI11VG KtLUIVLNG:. MOTI(1N by Councilman Schneider to open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, a�l voting aye, h1ayor Nee dec7ared the motion carr7ed unanimously. Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, explained that this request is to rezone from R-1 io C-2 the area located at the northeast corner of Mississippi Street and T..H. 65 for a proposed restaurant. He stated the Planning Commission did hear �he matter at their June 7th meeting and did recommend to the Council denial of 'tfie request. The denial is based on several reasons as noted: 7. It would be a spot rezoning. 2. It would be a traffic problem. 3. It would interfere with the bike trail. 4. It would have an effect on depreciation of home values in the area. 5. It would have an environmental impact on noise and aesthetic values. The petitioner was at the meeting and was represented by Attorney Wyman Smith. Mr. Smith stated the restaurant is no longer available to the petitioner. He is looking for another location. He stated most of the people liked the area just the way it is--it's like a private park. Now it is zoned R-1 and it has always been that way. Mr. Johnson has explored other alternatives for the property with builders and architects. Mr. Johnson has come up with a number 2�5 REGULAR ME�TING OF AU�aUST 21, 1978 PAGE 2 of uses. None of them wou7d be single family dwellings. If it is the Council's and people's wish to keep it R-1 then that is the end of the problem. It is the Council's responsibility to protect property owners and overall planning for the co�mnunity. There must be some use for this area. He can show economicaTly single family dwellings are unfeasible. He stated he is suggesting tonight that they wouTd like to come up with some pians for anoth�r use. Mr. Smith and Mr. Johnson wou�d like to discuss it witli the staff and City planner. One of the uses is an office building. It would save some trees facin4 Lucia Lane. The second plan the architect has is to allow the building of some tri-plexes or four-plexes. Th9s would also be possible. It would ma.ke the land economically feasible. Mr. Johnson has paid taxes for 22 years on this property. They are trying to come up with something that will harmonize with the cortenunity. They need to explore th�s with the City planner. Mr. Smith passed out copies of plans the architect drafted to the City Council. Also letters from three companies indicating the cost that would be involved in building single family dwellings. Mayor Nee suggested to Mr. Smith that he read the ?atters to the Council and audience. Mr. Smith then read the letters. He stated he respectfully requests this property owner be given a chance to further explore this and see if they can get a positive reaction from the staff. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Herrick, City Attarney, if the Planning Commission hearing was held on the R-1 to C-2 and all input vlas directed to the restaurant. It is apprepriate at this time to consider another proposal. Mr. Herrick asked Mr. Smith what the proposal would be as far as the office is ' coneerned. Mr. Smith stated C-2 would make it legal. He stated their thought was that time is a problem and everyone is concerned artd they also are concerned. This would give them a chance to report any zoning less than that, an R-2 or R-3, and it seems to him the Council has done this before where they have had application � y for one zoning and have ended up working out a compromise. / �. % . r Mr. Herrick stated it would be possible to rezone it to CR-2 for office construction where it would be lesser zoned. Mayor Nee asked how may lots there were. Mr. Smith stated that there are three lots on Plississippi and one lot on Highway 65. Mayor Nee asked if anyone in the audience wanted to review the sketc6es. Councilman Schneider asked if there were any corrments from the audience or Council. . Mayor Nee stated they had received a petition from the people in the area. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to accept Petition No. 16-1978 as presented. Councilman Fitzpatrick seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Smith stated it would be unfair for the people to talk about it when they haven't seen it. He stated they wanted to work something out. He stated the Council and people have to take the proposition they cannot build single family homes. Mayor Nee stated he did not understand why they could not build homes. Mr. Smith stated many builders won't build on it. It is not economically sound. They have no interest in it. Mr. Johnson stated he talked to Northtown Realty, Counselor Realty and other builders and not one was interested in building. i • � 2�n REGULAR M[ETING OF AUGUST 21, 1978 PAGE 3 Councilman Schneider stated the original hearing on this was held on June 7th. People here were at the Planning Commission meeting. At that point everyone expected it to come up in July. It was postponed until now. He stated he does not believe that no one is interested in this property. Iie hoped Mr. Jehnson coul,d build on it as R-l. He stated his primary concern is preservation of the neighborhood. There has been adequate time to build on it as R-l. He feels the Council should take some action on it. The petitioner has a right to apply • again. Mayor Nee asked what the waiting period was for reapplying. Councilman Schneider stated six months. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to accept the letters Mr. Smith had presented to the Council from bJilliam K. Meyer of Suburban Engineering dated June 28, 1978 and Oliver R. Erickson of Bronson Erickson Inc. dated August 16, 1978, Councilman Fitzpatrick seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Nee stated he had received a letter from Mr. Russ Burris on August 21, 1978 and this should be included with the above letters. Mayor Nee asked if anyone would like to comment. Mr. Clarence Teman, who lives on Lucia Lane, stated they :vanted it to remain R-1. He stated any discussion of alternatives tonight would be inconsistent. We are here tonight to have the Council vote upon the request for a rezoning for a proposed restaurant site. We have not had time to prepare for any other proposals. Mr. Ed Haedke, 6540 Lucia Lane, stated Mr. Johnson knew when he bought it it was zoned residential. Mr. Don Bolten, 980 Mississippi Street, stated the Council has done a good job in zoning in that area. All four corners are R-1. If we spot zone it, the entire area might end up that way. We feel it is a nice single family area. � Mr. Joe Randall, lives at 1210, stated this has been discussed for many years. i When we start rezoning, it confuses everyone. Mr. Smith stated along Highway 65 the whole length of the City there is only one parcel facing Nighway 65 that is single family. Everything else has some other use. How can you call this spot zoning. We are not asking for the world. We want fair treatment by the staff. Certainly there is some use for this property other than single family dwellings. P1ease refer this matier to your staff for a report. Give us a chance to see if we can convince the staff that this is a sound and sensible use with minimum harm or prob1em to the property owners. Councilman Schneider stated to Mr. Smith the people have to be convinced that the plan is a sound proposal for the neighborhood. At the Planning Commission meeting we discussed informally with Jerry Boardman about single family homes in the area. It seems to me there is not very much single family property left in this City. Perhaps there are alternatives but at this point I do not see any. Mr. Smith stated you are looking at it politically. You have been elected to abide by the best interest of the cor�nunity. Councilman Schneider stated before he was elected he was against the property being rezoned. He stated in his judgment he did not see any reason to make an exception. He stated he had not been inconsistent with his Qast stand. Mr. Paul Johnson, 3925 Shamrock Drive, stated he had lived in Fridley for many years. This was a vacant piece of property then and still is. He stated he didn't feel anyone should put little kids in the area of hi�h traffic. Ne stated he owned the property north of there. An office building is a quiet use. Mayor Nee stated we have a procedural problem here. The proposal is to rezone to C-2 and in doing that the Council really loses control of what goes on. He stated he wants to see some hearing on it. He is not satisfied you cannot build homes on that property. The real shortage is for R-1 land. i ; � L . (I l� REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 1978 PAGE 4 2U7 Mr. Smith stated unless you have made inquiry of this you do not know. At the Planning Commission meeting we discusse� alternatives. He stated they knew they will have to have some hearings on this. Mr. Wayne Nitchcock, 6532 Pierce Street pointed out oP a map other multipie dwellings in the area. Councilman Hamernik stated he had to go along with the wishes of the area property owners. It is up to ihem to say if they want to look at other proposals. He asked if anyone was interested in listening to other alternatives. Ms. Joyce Swanson, 6601 Lucia Lane, stated she was not interested in rezoning. The traffic 9s already bad. She stated she was not interested in an alternative that would create more traffic. Mayor Nee asked the audience to raise their hands if they were interested in an alternative. One person raised his hand. Mr. Clarence Teman stated he Jived in the area. The property owner does not live there. We are concerned about noise, pollution and safety. Our concern is not monetary--it is keeping Fridley residentia7. Mayor Nee stated if there is negative action tonight the property owner does have the right to come back in six months. Mr. Teman asked Mr. Johnson for the names of realtors he had contacted who turned down building on the sites. Mr. 7eman staied Arlan Reaity had stated to Mr. Teman that they would be interested in buying the property. He does not believe homes could not be built there and he would like to see some evidence. Mr. Johnson stated he would send Mr. Teman copies of the letters he has. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Councilman Barnette seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously end ihe hearing was closed at 8:20 p.m. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to deny the rezoning request from R-1 to C-2 on the grounds it would be spot zoning and it would be detrimental to the area. Councilman Barnette seconded the motion. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousiy. NEW BUSINESS: RECEIVING TNE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 9, 1978: 1. THOMAS SI6N COMPANY, SP #78-07; 5333 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E,: Mr. Sobiech, Public Works Director, stated this is a request for a special use permit by the petitioner to open a sign operation at this location. Now it is a vacant facility and was formerly Metro 500 Tire Company. They do have a proposal to improve the area including both the structure and exterior. He showed the Council the Architect's plan for the building. One of the stipulations is that there be an actual landscape drawing. The Planning Conanission did hear the request on August 9th and did recorrnnend approva7 with the stipulations. One of the stipulations was that an appropriate development bond or letter of credit be given to insure that the exterior development item be taken care of and that the materials will be stored within the screened area and a suitable agreement be negotiated regarding the rear alley and all the painting be.done in an improved area. Mr. Sobiech stated that one item that might be confusing is regarding the alley. The alley is being used by residents to the east and could be used by the gas station and this facility. The City is indicating that if appropriate improvement is requested that the property owners would have no objection to the share of the assessments of any alley improvements.. Also, he stated he svould like to ask the representative from the sign company if he would be willing to put up some posts or curbing by the screening fence in the alley so there w.ould be no damage to the fence. �(�s; REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 1478 PAGE 5 Mr. Sobiech stated they would �ike the landscaping and curbing d�ne by rext fa11 and asked if that would be any problem. The representative from the sign company asked if the tanks that U:ere buried on the property came out would the area have to be resurfaced. hir. Sobiech stated we would want the place to look very good ut the time of operation. Councilman Schneider� asked why the tanks would have to be removed. P1r. Sobiech stated that it is no longer a gas station and it would be to insure no seepage. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stat;ed they might be able to put sand in there. Mr. Sobiech stated they could work with them on ti�eir removal. Mayor Nee asked for an explanation of the curb and fencings. Mr. Sobiech stated any sign storage must be below the top of the fencing. Mayor Nee stated his concern for storage. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked the representative from the sign canpany the amount ofi outdoor parking of vehicles in the area, outside of the truck they use for erecting signs. The representative from the sign company stated jusi; passenger cars ar,d vehicles waiting for signs. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he was not impressed aiith the stipulation on screening and storage. He asked hovi much outdoor storage there would be. The representative from the sign company stated not too much at the present time. The or!ly ones would be the old ones that are taken down. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked what v,rould bn done v�ith the old ones. Representative stated they �vould either be junked or kept. � Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he had a problem with screening. Mr. Sobiech - stated roaybe some fast grot��ing trees could be planted. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked what size screening are we talking about. Mr. Sobiech stated 8 feet. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if we would want any control over outside storage. _ He stated tyat we don't arant a',ot af junked sigr�s i;here. Mr. Sobiech stated he agreed and that is the reason for the special use permit. It n�ust be in a screeried area below the top of the fence. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated any outdoor sto;^ac�.e would be a problem. Mr. Sobiech stated ihe company is not a manufacturer of signs and we could minimize the area of outside storage. He stated the Mayor had a good idea of eliminating from the side yard and have a rear yard storag�. We could say the width of the building and no further than about 10-15 feet. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he did not have a problem with tfi� building or painting signs inside the building but he did.have a problem with an accumulation of signs not, usable. He stai;ed his motior, when he made it, would be to restrict use of storage ou�side. We don't want a junl;yard. Mi°. Sobiech stated storage would be directly east of the existing buildiny. Councilman Fii.zpatrick stated we have to control the total amount of outside �torage. A screenii�y fence is no good if you put it away from the fence. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick, �econded by Counc��man Hamernik to concur with the Planning Commission's Recommendation to grant this spec?al use permit with the stipulation that the petitioner obtain an exterior development bond or credit letter, that all materials be stored within an enclosed, screened area which would not extend any further north or south and would be immediately behind the building. • Mr. Sobiech stated we should also add an agreement that they concur with the improvements in the alley. And a stipulation regarding an exact landscape plan and also together with the bond we need a plan and finally, that all painting be done in an improved area including stora�e of all paints and chemicals and that they meet code for the neighbors. The Council agreed to add this to the motion. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor• Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 1978 2. WOODGREST BAPTIST CHURCH; LOCKE PARK USE REQUESTc _ __ _ _ � Gn�� i ' i PAGE 6 hir. Qureshi, City Manager, stated we need some kind of an agrzement with the church regarding the activities schedule in the use of the facility. 7he cost being proposed to the church is much higher than they desire to contribute. Basically the question would be what kind of contribution should be made for the use of the property. The objection that Dr. Boudreau, Parks and Recreation Director, ha.d was based on a legal opinion, Mayor Nee stated. The other question is if this encroaches on the City's program. Dr. Boudreau stated in 1976 we provided the church with the use of the field. An agreement was made with the church for them to construct the goals and our maintenance people installed them. Again in 1977 they used the field. Now •� they have come to us to use the field for their games and for practice three days a week. Our time schedule does interfere with these hours with our new football program. The City of Fridley is supplying an area for the church. It is the opinion of the Parks and Recreation Commission that they should not. We do have a joint sharing of land in other areas but this is different. It would interfere Hrith the neighborhood use and football this fall. He stated the Pastor and group is present tonight to answer any questions. Councilman Schneider asked Dr. Boudreau, if any group approached him to have a reserve time, what kind of process would it take. Dr. Boudreau stated we have no fee schedule set. Generally a request is for- warded to him and then put before the Parks and Recreation Commission for advice. We get very few requests from private organizations for facility use. Most of the facility use comes from loca1 associat�ons which we have a working agreement with and which contribute towards upkeep, etc., for the facilities. The church is ask- ing to use the field 13%2 hours per week and that would be for a nine week period. Mayor Nee asked the Pastor to comment. The Pastor stated as far as a conflict is concerned, they are tivilling to work with Fridley's schedule so there will be no conflict. Most of the time would be before.3 p.m. If the City could.g.ive them their schedule they could work around it. They would appreciate any use of the facility. As far as the cooperative program, if they had something to provide to the Cii:y they would be happy to do that but they do not have any possibilities. He stated they were able to help with maintenance, etc. They find it hard to undei,stand the opposition and felt the cost was high at $25/hour. He hoped the Council would consider their need and they will work with Dr. Boudreau. He stated their athletic director was present and maybe he wou1d like to add something. Councilman Barnette asked what was the status of the church's nenotiations with the school district. The Pastor stated it was still being negotiated. There are some residents in the area who feel strongly opposed to the church securing the facility. Councilman Hamernik asked the Pastor regarding the fee schedule what would be reasonable to you and how many hours are you anticipating. The Pastor stated regarding the figure presented to them we are usually charged between $5 and $10 per hour. Mr. Christenson from th� Church stated they anticipated being out of there by 4 p.m. except for maybe one home game per week. That would be after school. Councilman Schneider asked what times they would be using the field. Mr. Christenson stated from 2-4:00 p.m. ICouncilman Hamernik stated he would like to have a co�nnent from Dr. Boudreau. 'Dr. Boudreau stated he would like to comment on some other concerns he has heard. One would be about the field conditions and resodding. This area has been used by the academy. One time this spring I went out there and it was � very wet and asked the 50 plus boys to leave the field so the ground could dry out. We are looking at some other expenses. Schedule-wise we could work some- 1 thing out. We are concerned primarily about maintaining. � � i �� REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 1978 PAGE 7 Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, asked Dr. Boudreau if Com�nons had underground sprinklers. Dr. Boudreau stated yes but at the field in question they do not. We have to bring in steel pipe and hook up hand watering systems. The Pastor stated on a few occasions they used the park when it was too wet and had to move their cars. He stated they would.respond favorably to a call on correcting any situations. Mr. Herrick stated that from the legal aspect there is no legal obstacle. The Council has the discretion of entering ir,to an agreement with the Church to use the property on an exclusive basis. They also have an oblioation to charge i:hem. If it is not an exclusive agreement and they showed up at 2 p.m. and no one was using the facility, I doubt whether the Council could say they could not use the facility. It is a public facility. If it is going to be an exc]usive reserve then the City should charge a fee. If it is on a first come first serve basis I don't think the city has a right to say they could not use it. ' A representative from the church stated, when talking aboui: wear on the field, soccer is different than fiootbali. At the goal mouth it gets slippery but footbali is harder on the fieid. Dr. 8oudreau si;ated ther•e is a difference in wear in any recreational activity. Now the whole field will get worn. Councilman Schneider stated regarding exclusivity, how is it in the.parks. Dr. Boudreau stated we have no areas of exclusive use. We give out permits. We have no problem with permits. Councilman Barnette stated he felt strongly about Fridley facilities being used by certain people. MOTION by Counciiman Barnette to recommend to deny the request for the use of �he soccer field. Councilman Schneider seconded it. Councilman Namernick stated he had a problem witn ihis because of support�ng our`local groups who have promoted sports in the past. He also felt an obligation to the church. He would like to consider i:his discussion and recommend when this need comes up again to gi•de it more time. A representative from the church stated he asked for this last October of 1977 at a Plarning Comrnission meeting. He stated Dr. Boudreau had told him they r�ould have a meeting between Dr. Boudreau and Mr. C{iristensen re- garding schedulir�g and it was not he7d. They are wil7ing to work with the City and as far as the timing they tried to have meetings but they never came about. Mayor Nee asked if they had any a7ternatives. .Ttre Aastor stated not that they knew of. Councilman Barnette stated maybe they could use the vacant land at another sc:hooi. The Pastor stated they wauld request Lhis from the School Board but they did not know if it was available. Councilman Schneider stated his concern was basically any group getting exclusive use. The Pastor stated they were not asking for exclusive rights. They are nat asking for a reserve. When it is free to use they would like to use it. If it is needed by someone else they will back off. Councilman Schneider stated tnere was no need for action then. Councilman Barnette stated he felt that the citizens of Fridley should have the first chance to use the field. A representative from the church asked Dr. Boudreau if he would issue daily permits. Dr. Boudreau stated once they 9et their game schedule he would have no problem granting permits. A representative from the church stated they needed a policy on fees, etc., from the council. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated they already have a policy to the effect that they could use this on a first come first serve basis. They may request permits for the few times that are a matter of schedules. Councilman Barnette stated the point is to be consistent. � ?11 REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 1978 PAGE 8 Councilman Hamernik asked if the motion was to deny the request. Councilman ' Barnette stated yes, the opposition was the exclusive use. Whatever can be � worked out between Dr. Boudreau and the church is fine. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated that most of the groups we have a joint venture approach with, use the City facilities and assist in the improve- , ment of the facility. He suggested maybe the church would like to contribute ' to the improvement of the facility by giving money for the underground system. Dr. 8oudreau stated you are saying, however, that they can use the field for practice and games. Councilman Barnette stated yes. C�uncilman Fitzpatrick ; stated we can support the motion on the floor and we do not interrupt their program. Councilman Hamernik stated if the academy is going to be playing games there, they might consider sharing in the cost of lining the field. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 25, 1978 A. LAMPERT LUMBER: 7600 TH 65, SIGN VARIANCE: Mr. SoUiech stated the Appeals Commission denied the request for a 10'x21' sign for Lampert Lumber but did recommend an 8'xl8' sign. P1r. Carlson from Lampert Lumber was present. P1r. Carlson showed the Council pictures of the signs he planned on using.' Mr. Sobiech stated Lampert had made considerable improvements on their property. Councilman Hamernik asked how big the existing sign was. Mr. Carlson stated 6'x14'. Councilman Namernik ask Mr. Carlson if they were planning on using the same pile-ons. Mr. Carlson stated na, that would be changed. Mr. Sobiech showed the plan of the sign. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik, seconded by Councilman Schneider, to deny the 10'x2i` sign witFi a recommendation that they be allowed to put up an 8'x18' sign. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilmari Schneider asked if it would be appropriate to have the Flanning Commission review the ordinance. MOTIQI� 6y Councilma� Schneider, seconded by Councilman Hamernik, to have the Ptanning Commission review the ordinance section on free standing signs. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousiy. C�NSIDERATION OF EXECUTION bF HIt_LTOP FIRE PROSECTION CONTRACT: Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated this item was for execution of the fire protection contract. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik, seconded by Councilman fitzpatrick to approve the execution of the fire protection contract with Hilltap. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION Of EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH SUPERAMERICA: 5667 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #77-17: Mr. Sobiech stated the Council granted approval in February. Based on what the staff heard at that meeting, we feel we have come to an agreement which is more appropriate than the one proposed originally and approved. At that time it was 212 REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUSi 21, 1978 PAGE 9 generally centering of the structure in the southeast quadrant of 57th and University Avenue. What we have worked out with them is a shift of the operation from the east to the west toward U7iversity Avenue. We feel that would accomplish the moving of the activity almost twice as far away from the resident9al property. The traffic would then utilize the service road to the east of the proposed structure. Superamerica has agreed to construct and deed over for future maintenance the service road that would surround the site. We hope this would elimate some confusion. He stated he had taiked to h1r. Jorgenson who is a resident in the area. He pointed out the area in front of his property would be used more often if this was done. Mr. Gordon Jorgenson stated he was the property owner on the immediate east side of the site. He stated he did not have very much time to think about it. There is an advantage and disadvantage to this. The advantage is that it appears that fewer peopie wi11 be going into the parking lot to turn around. The disadvantage is a street that can be used all the time. He stated he had a question on whether there would be room to get that service road in there. It seems the corners would have to be sharp. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to recommend that the Mayor and City Manager execute an agreement to construct a Superamerica si:ation at 57th and University. Counci2man Schneider seconded �t. Upon a voice vote, a71 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLU7ION N0. 80-1978 TO ABATE NUTSANCE ON BLOCKS 4, 5, 12, and 13, SPRING BROOK PARK ADDITION: Mr. Sobiech stated we would like to declare a nuisance in the area. However, based on discussions at the public hearing we wou)d allow some people to have some time to clean the area. MOTION by Councilman Barnette, seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution Plo. 80-1978. Mr. Sobiech stated we will only abate where there is a nuisance. Mr. Qureshi, City P1anager, asked about the time table - 30 days. Mr. Sobiech stated it would be 30 days after ttie purchase order is signed with the contracior and they wiil have 30 days from then. Councilman Hamernik stated even if they would clean up the property the adjacent property would not be cleaned up. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated we need a fixed time so the property owners know how much time they have. Councilman Hamernik stated the date should be October lst. Upon a vaice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . MCTION by Gouncilman Hamernik to set the date of clean up as October lst. Councilman Barnette seconded it. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FOR TRAILER PERMIT BY TARGET WAREHOUSE, 1080 73RD AVENUE N.E. FOR USE AS OFFICE SPACE FOR MAXIMUM OF TWO YEARS: Mr. Sobiech stated we have a request by Target f�r a trailer permit and they intend to monitor some activity in anticipat.ion of remodeling. They want to use a-i.railer home on the property until they decide on what to do. They indicated they would like two units. Ms. Coverston represented Target and she was present. Mr. Qureshi, City t4anager, asked Ms. Coverston if they eventually intended to expand the building. Ms. Coverston stated they had not made a decision about that yet. Councilman Hamernik stated he had no problem with the temporary building but was wondering if they would put in plumbing. Ms. Coverston stated no, that they would use the building facilities. REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 1978 PAGE 10 Councilma�7 Namernik asked if the temporary building would connect to the building. Ms. Coverston stated yes by a hallway. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik, seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the rey�est for a trailer at the Target t�arehause. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. LICENSES: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik, seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the licenses as on file in the licens2 Clerk's office. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, A small discussion was held on housing maintenance codes. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No. 227A30 through 229897. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMATF.S: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick, seconded by Councilman Hamernik to approve the estimates as follows: Eugene A. Hickok and Associates, Inc. 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, MN 55391 ESTIhiATE #12--Moore Lake Evaluation and Restoration Project Professional Services - July, ]978 City of New Brighton 803 5th Avenue NbJ New Brighton, MN 55112 FINAL ESTIMATE #1--for Storm Sewer #125 as per joint powers agreement authorized April 17, 1978 Smith, Juster, Feikema, Chartered 1250 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, MN 554Q2 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor during July, 1978 'rJeaver, Talle & Herrick 6279 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55402 $ 3,548.40 $ 14,895.79 $ 2,370.00 For legal services rendered as City Attorney during $ 1,827.OQ July, 1978 Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNh1ENT: N�OTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick, seconded by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 21, 1978 was adjourned at 10:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 0 Gayle Goben Secy. to the City Council Approved: William J. Nee Mayor 213 � o��zr�ANCC r�o. � ��. 1 t�N ORDINANCE LICENS?NG A�dD REGUL�ITIP;G TE{E CONDJCT 0� 6ING0 l�ND 07HER AUllIGf:IZCt) GAT��LTIdG DEVI��S TO QUALIjIED O�tG�.PdIZltTIOPdS, PRESCRIrIflG CU+lDITIOP�S THCRFFORt, I�fJD PROVIDIP;G PEiJAI.TIES FOR VIOLATIOfd� THEREOF: /1P�ENDI�dG CHAPTER 29 OF TIiE FRI�LEY CITY CODE RELP,1'IP1G TO FEES: AND AMEP�DING CHAP'rER 11, SECTION 11.10 OF TI�{E F�<IDLEY GITY CODE. . �THE CITY COUNCIL 0� THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DJCS ORDAIN AS FOLLONJS: • SECTION 2�.01: Provisions of State Stat�.i�s Adopted. The provisions of PZinnesota Statu�es, Chap�er 349, and Lavrs of Minnesota, 1918, Chapter 507, relating to the definTtion of terms, licensing and restrictions af gambling are adopted and mad� a part of this Ordinance as if set out in full. . SECTION 29.Q2. Authorization to Issue Licerses. The Gity is hereby autharized to issue bingo and gambling licenses pur,suant to htinnesota S�atutes Chapt� 349, anci Laws ci' Minnesota, 1978, Chap�er 547. Licenses muy be issued to organiz�t7ons as defined by P�inncsota law in said chapter. _� SECTIOPi 29.03: License Required. ' I�o bingo occasion nor any other permitted gamt�ling device shall be conducted in the City of Fridle,y; �xce�� by an elig�le organization which has secured a license therefor•e_.as provided i�� this Ordinance. . SEC7IO�V 29.Q4: Si��caf:ion for l_icense. �. . No bingo or° gambiing licensc shall be issued except upon a;vritten appi7cation tt�er�f�r� containin� suc1� infc�rmatiaf� as may fr�� time �:o time be requ�ired �y the City of fridley. I�o iicense shali be issued until at least thirty (3C�) days af �er �he da�e of said application. A license sha11 be valid for a period of one (1) year. SE�CTIQN 29.05: Adclitional Re ulations. � ` t�linimu�r� /1ge - t�o person working any Bingo or other gambling game or device sha�7 be less than 19 years of age. . . . ;. . No alcoholic b�verages �vill be s�rved, or consumed in the same room as bingo�is being � played. . �. SECTION 29.Q6: Suspension or Revocation. The co��ncil may suspend for a period not exceeding thirty (30) days or revoke any bingo , ar other gambling license for violation of any provision of this Ordinance ar for • violation of the stat� statute; said revocation shall be after reasonable notice and public hearing before the City Council. . , SECTION 29.07: Donations: . . • Organizations holding bingo and gambling licenses shall be required to donate a minimum of eight percent of their gross receipts to lawful:�purposes as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 3�9.12, Subdivision.6. � 0 0 � � ` lA Chapter 11 of the Fridley C�ty Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 5ection 11.10: Fees: � �The annual license fee for a bingo�operators license shall be �25Q.00 �er year,. A special �� fiour day license may be issued at a c�s� of �25.00. This special faur day 1'icense fee .may be waived by Cot:ncil action for church or other charitable arganizations. The annual license f�e for a gambling iicense shall be $300.00 per year. A special four d�y license fee may be issued at a cost of $5�.00. .Tnis special four day license fee may be waived by Council act�on for church or other charitable organizations. PASSED �tt�D ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF 7HE CITY OF F�IDLEY TNIS '' DAY OF 0 Attest: City Clerk - Marvin C. t3runsell Mayar - Wi 11-i am J. iVee Fi�°st Reading: . . � Second Reading: � � � . Publish: � . . + � Municipalites called to see if ordinance on gambling exists. . � Anoka No� . Bl oomi rigton No - counc i 1 tabl ed i ndef i ni tel y. Brooklyn Center . No y Brooklyn Park No, but does have ordinance prohibiting � razzle dazzle games: Burnsville No � � Columbia lieights �fl Coon Rapids � No � Crystal � No � � L�etroit Lakes - Yes � Galden�Valley Reviewing - Hopkins Yes Maplewaod Yes Minnetonka �o New tiape . �fl . Richfield No Robbinsdale � Na ' Rosemount Yes Roseville �o � . • r White Bear Lake No ;.• � Mi nneapol i s ' '� ' 0 � � No, they do rtot ��ant.gambling allowed in the Cit; 0 ti � �. � , , ��.,....,....... _.....,.,a: � �%,..�w...�� .....-.,...- I ' . aU�USt 2��, � 9�s , + ��"�"�f' � �' �'c��f��.0 ;,' 1 C t3A31 UNIVkfiSITY. AY�PdU� !�l.�.� �RI[3LEY� MtNNESOTA C�5432 � , TCIEPNOtdC ( 012j571-3450 . ' 0 0 Mr. C�1ark Bina • Director of Develooment Grace High School � � 1350 Gardena Avenue Northeasi , : F�ri dl ey, t�?i nnesota 55432 . Qear Mr. Bina: . The City currentl�i licenses bingo operaticns to qua'tiffeii organ i zati ons l ocaf:ed �rii �hi r� the Cz ty. of C'ri d'l ey. The ordinance now �n effect re,ul<:ting th� licensinc� of binga �is attache�. See Exhibit "A". Tl�p Cour�cil has a request ta Cor.sicier tl�z 1ice.�si��g of gambling devic;es. This is now pet•miited under hlinnesota SL-atuies. 7he Couneii wi11 be r±iseuss�n� the l icensinc� af gambl�ng devices at their September 11, 1�78 Ca�ncii Meeting. A prapostd ordinan:.e in rougi� form is aitacheci. See Exhibit "B". Ifi you vrish:to have any input regardirig t1�is propased ordinance, pl ease contact the Ci i:y i�i t�ri ti ny prior �o , the Se�teirber 17, 1978 n�e�ting, or have so�reone appear in person at tiie Sep�ember 11, 1978 meetinq. I am also enclosing a copy of that section of the Statute that provides for the licensing of gambling devices. See Exhibit "C". Yery truly yours, . hlarvin C. arunsell Asst. City Mgr./Fin. Dir. MCB:sh � Attachments � ' . � � 0 . t n '. 1 l �'sislt�� citr� i�r��t �i�a�rr� aab �.`.+��s�ss�.•� s�., f��E�,MIN�tSO`A {�isa] ; r---r-�.�..,..r�"��,( � I�N\ ._�.�• . �•_V� J ' 'w . ` M �'�'� �� i' 2g Augu�t 1978 Mayor William 3. Nee City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Frid].ey, MN 55�+32 Dear Mayor Nee: Qn behalf of Fridley United �tethodist Church, its ofiicers and congregation, I wish to �ut in �n iting this brief statement ir. opposition to ar.y �roposed legislation for es�abli�hment of gamhling operations in the �ity of Fridley. As Unitea Me�chc�di�ts, we are traditionally opposed to aIl gamb-� ling s�stems, including Bingo. To quo�e the 2lational United.Methodist guideline in �'he Book ai Disci�line 1.970�230, pax��raph 73, section G: --<--•—.--,..�• "Gambling: -- Gambling is a mena�e to sociPty, deadly to the best iiiteres�s of moral, sncial, econo�nic, and spiritual 2if'e, and destructive of good governmentt As an act o.� faith and love, Christians sh�uld abstain fram gamblin�;, and should strive to rainister to those•victimiLed by the prac�tic�. Community �tana— ards and personal life styles should_be such as would`make unw necessary and undesirable 'the resort to cammercial gamblin�, including public loi:teries, as a recreation, as a�1 escape, or as A means of producing public revenue or fun�s for support of charaties or government." I trust that our viewpoint is in kaeping with the will of God and the beSt interests of the citizens of Fridley -- even those who may feel there is nothing wrong with a"fast buck" made in fun. JRMcC:na cc : Mr. Ed FIamernik City Councilman (r► `i . G� �� .�.. 1 �} Your loving friend, �� C �. Rev. James R. McChesney, astor Fridley United Methodist Church �� e ORDINANCE N0. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 601 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY RELATING TO THE MUNICIPAL OPERRTI�JN OF LIQt10R „; _.� , THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: THAT CHAPTER 601 OF TNE CITY CODE SE AMENDED AS FOLLQb:S: 601.01. DEFINITIONS The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and application of this chapter and the following words and terms, wi�enever they occur in this chapter, are defined as follows: � 1. "Intoxicating liquor" and "liquor" mean distilled, �inous and fermented beverages containing more than 3.2 per cent of alcohol by weight. 2. "Beer means any ma7t beverage with an alcoholic content of more than one-half of one per cent by volume and not more than 3.2 per cent by weight. 3. "On Sale" means sale by the drink for consi�mption in the dispensary. 4. "Off Sale" means retaii sale ��n the original package for consurnption away from the dispensary. ' 5. "Sell" includes all barters, gifts and other means af f�.�rnishing intoxicating liquor or beer in violation or evasion of this ordinance. 601.02. ESTABLISHMENT , There is hereb�� establ�sh�d a h9unicipal Liquor Dispersary far the sale of "off" sale intoxicatinq liquor. 601.031. LqCATIO�d AhD OPE�TION The Municipal Liquor Dispensary shal� be located in such sui�able places in the City as the Council may dete;�mine, except that no permits sh�ll be issued for the operation of a Municipal Liquar Dispensary upon which the taxes or other special levies are delinquent. 601.032. � The Manager shall manage and operate the Municipa7 Liquor Jispens�ry under the direct supervision and direction of the Council and shall perform such duties in connection therewith as the Council may impose upon him. He shali be directly responsible to the Council for the c�nduct of the Municipal Liquor Dispensary in full compliance with the regulations and ordinances of the City and all State and Federal Laws and Regulations. 601.033 The Council shall provide and fix the salaries of such additional help and ' employees as in his judgement are necessary for the operation of said Municipal Liquor Dispensary. No minor shall be employed at any time in the Municipai Liquor Dispensary. 601-1 2A 601.034. DISPENSARY FUND A MunicipaT Liquor B�s�ep5a�y-�e�ep�� Fund is hereby created in which fund shall be paid and deposited all receipts and revenues from the aperation of the Municipa1 Liquor Dispensary and from which fund shall first be paid expenses of opera�ian and maintenance of the said r�unicipal Liquor Dispensary. fihe�bafianee-af-safid-�a�d-s�a��-b��-ase�-e�e}as�de�,q-fer-�he-re�}we�e��and-�be payment-of-tnterest�apen-4ae�-M��Re�pa�-k�qaar-B�spehsars-Re�e�ae-�awwa.n�s-as maq�be�T-ssa�d-�o-d�fra��e-�es�s-a��-e��ses-e€-es�a��sb��-�a}�-��s�epsa�y. W�e�-sa��-�aw�a��sw�a�e-�eEp-��e��-�e��e�-ap�-}��@�es�-��e�eeq-��y-pa�d, sa�d-�a�a�s��a��a�s€e��e� The Cit� Council may prov�ide for the transfer of retained earnings to the General Fund of the City or to such oth�r appropriate fund as the Council by resolution may de�ermine. 601.051. HOURS �e�'�e��-sa�e'-'�s�a��-�e-�a�e-�e€e�e-e��b�-e'-e�ee�-a.-�.--e�-a€�e�-e��-e=e�ae�-�.-�: e#�a�y-�ay-e�se��a��a�,-e�-wb}E�-�a�-"e��-sa}e��_�a�-�e-�a�e-ap��-�e� e-'s�eE�-�.-�:jRe€:-698 The hours of operation shall be as provided by State Statute. 601.05.?_. HOLID�YS No '"off-sale" shall be made on New Years Day, January 1; Independance Day, July 4; Thanksgiving Day, or Christmas Day, December 25a but on the evenings preceding such days, if the sale of liquor 1s not othertivise prohibited an such evenin�s, "off-sa;es" may b� made until �en o'�loCk p.m. except that i�o "off-sale" shall be made on D�cember 2� after eight o'c1QCk p.m. 601.053. ELECTI�JN DAY ��o sale of intoxica�ting iiquor shall be made between the hours of one a.m. and eight p,m. the day of any statewide e7ection 601.061. CONDTTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ��e-M��E��a�-��e�-9�rs�er�sa�y-sba��-pe�-Wave-�w}��-dee�s.--A�].-wa�dt►ws ��-�be-�we��-e�-��e-P�a�a�e��a�-��q�e�-B�s�epsa��-sk�a��-�e-e�-s�ear-��s�-apd �he-pab}�e-d�e�a-e�-�1�e-�tHe}e-�►��ew�e�-sb��-�e-��eBS��s�e�-�y-sExQe��3-s��a�qs er-pdP�fi�fi8H9 : --�hewe-sba��-�e-�e-�a��e� ;-�8�3-s�a��-ss�Ee�3--s��=�a�g,-e�=-- e��et°-�ea�Ee-�s-e�s��s�-��e-�e�e�=a�-e�se�va��e�-e€-a.q�►-�a��-e�-�qe-�4u��s�aa�- Efi�ae�°-Bfis�e�saw��ee�-�y-�erseps-��-�be-�ee�:--F�eweve��-�a��eps3-s��s�e�- ow��ane�s-�e�-I��e�-��a�-48-��e�es-€�ea�-��e-€�es�-sqa��-�e�-�e-seps��e�-as 5asq-e�s��as��eps: . 601.062. No business other than the sale of Liquor Dispensary except the retail tobacco, ueer, soft drinks, ice and 601.063 liquor shall be carried on in the Municipal sale of cigars, cigarettes, all forms o'F accessories. No pool or billiard table shall be kept in any part of the Municipal Liquor Dispensary. ' 601-2 2� 601.064. No liquor or beer shall be sold on credit. 601.065. � • No minor shaii be permitted to remain on the Municipal Liquor Dispensary premises. 601.066. . No liquor or beer shall be sold or served to a minor, directly or indirectly. -� 6Q1.067. No minor shall misrepresent his age for the purpose of obtaining liquor or beer. 601.068. No person shall be permitted to loiter upon the premises of i:he Municipal Liquor Dispensary habitual�y. _ ' '• 601.Q69 No person of a known immoral character and no disorderly person shall be permitted on the h1unicipai Liquor Dispensary premises. 601.06I0. No 1i�+.�ar or beer shall he sold to an intoxicated person. 601.0611. � The Mun7cipal Liquor Dispensary shall be ins�ected by the Health Officer oT the City a�-�eas�-s�ee-a-�Qp�b-a�d-a�-t�a�q--e�l��-��es as he deems necessary to insure that the premises are traintained in a sanitary condition. 601.07. PENALTIES � Any violation of this chapter is a misdemeanor and is subject to all penalties provided for such violations under the provisions of Chapter 901 of this Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY 7HIS . DAY 0� SEPTEMBER, 1978. MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE ' ATTEST: CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. aRUNSELL First aeading � Second Reading Publish....... � DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1978 T0: NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, RND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASS'T. CITY MGR./FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE AM�ENDING SECTIO�! 6Q1 OF THE CITY CO.DE RELATING TO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR ST��cS The last session of the Legislature changed the law regarding the hours a municipal liquor store may be opzn for business. This ordinance would amend the City Code so that it conforms with the new State Statute. The way the ordinance is drawn and the way the State Statute reads would leave some flexibility to management. Hours of operation will depend, for the most part, on what the competition will be doing. At the present time, we are contemplating keeping open later on Friday nights._ We are studying the possibility of openi�g later on weekday mornings. MB/et � 2C T0: MARVIN BRUNSELL, ASSISTANT CI7Y MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: BOB MCGUIRE, LIQUOR STORE MP+NRGER SUBJECT: HOURS OF OPERATION DATE: AUGUST 31, 1978 I have checked with the Stores around us and I think we are the only one in our area that are not staying open until i0:00 p.m. on Friday nights. I would recommend that we change our ordinance to comply_ with the State Law so that we can also�be open on Fr�day nights if we so desire. 0 2Il t � i , ^s--�: :r.-.,�.--•.r,� .—r o� --.'� 't=° 1 � . a- . s �� p . X,.. _.. � fi - �� 5 y '. ' J. . 5 _ . ..� . � .4�.. ��.� T� 1'.0 � .. � r�. ' , � ;� K�..,�„�4��, w. _ � �� . „� .S .,r�.f'�E ,.;� . r..tc ' r.«��i,=.: �„iSlr4?io�� 3!"d�"�� f�'1:i��c, *...�_.i'.`.t �i:Al� �' . - � �'�.Q.t � . n.. .. .. .. . . ,. . . � . .. ..: ...:,, :Y ' �` S26 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1978 2E Ch. 686 Sec. 2. Minuesota Statutes t976, Section 161.082, Subdivision 2a, is amendal to rcad: - :. . .. •.7, � - ' . Subd. 2a. An amount equal to 32 percent of tbe county turnbacic ntcount shall be expended, within counties having two or mnre tewns, on town road bridge swctures that are �8 ]0 feei or more in length. The expenditura on such bridge structures sitai� mav be on a matching basis, and i( on a matchinQ basis, noi azore than 3A 90 percent of ths cost `;,} of any such bridge structure shall be paid from the county turnbaek accounL �ke �es en� regt��et+ens e� fhe ceenx3i9s+ene� e€ ��+eR relt�ing �e d�e expet�+tn�e e€ f�+r� `''Fr fer �he ��,eses ef E�is �.�a s�e� i�e�n�e review e� Ee�vr� �Fe pee�eets �Y' ��e �egieee} deveie�me�� e�i9siexs ef �He mefrepeiitn� eeuxeii 4e �eter�is�e !he �eleEi+�a aee� e# �i+e tewfts#ip fe� #ence�e+cr! a�s+steflee�: Sec. 3. Section 1 of this act is ettective Janua 1, 1979. Section 2 is effeeUve the , d� after final enactmen� ; .,� : �:r � . � . �.1 ��.i ,,:� : ,� r`�� fi . ,�4 .? 'e ��`i r .:�: 'f�:� +h4�'�.�, �. ;�,_, L � �s� �� t��, ' i '�1=. 1 t�r. � � _�,�t . t- s =�� , � �;�• , ct ` " s.: . .i J �.� � .,r . .r1� $ ` h � R' r% �+ S l� � a :�. < �vi]� iY � � 1 ��9 l�.�..y4 (` �� Approved March 28, 1978. CiiAPTER 687-H.F.No.2307 (Coded 'm PaRj Art act relating !o intox:cating liquor, hours and dvys of sale; reqeiiring wholesalers tu maintain a warehouse stock; amending M_ rnnern�a Statutes 1976, Sections 340A7, Subdivisiox 8,' 34Q.74, Subdivision i; an� Chapter 340, by adding a sectiar. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section ;. Minaesota Statutes I976, Sectien 340.14, Su'�d.ivision 1, is ar�ended to read: .. 340.14 REGUi,ATIOi�IS. Subdivision 1. HOL'KS A:�ID DAYS OF SALE. No sale of intoxicating liquo. shall be made after one a.m. on Sunday, nor until eight am. on Monday, nor be!ween the hours of one a.m. and eieht o'clock p.m. on the day of any statewide election. No "on-sale" shaQ be made between the hours oE one a.m. and eiP,ht o'ciock a.m. on any weekday. No "off-sale' shall bz made before eignt o ciock a.m. or after ten o'clock p.m. of any day. However, in cities of the first class, and in ail cities located within a radius of t5 miles of eitiea e� �I�e €it�E eless a ciE of thsfirst class,within the same couni "off-sale' may be made onIy until ei�t►t o'ciock p.m. of aiiy da� eacept Fridav and Saturday, on w6ich � davs "off-sale" may be made until ten o'clock p•m. No `bff-salc" shall be n.ade on New Years Day, January I; independence Day, Juiy 4; j• • Thanl:sgiving Day; or Christr.ias Day, December 25; but on the evenings preceding suc� days, if the sate of liquor is noi othenvise prohibited on such evenings, "off-sales" may be made until ten o'clock p.m., except that no "oFf-sa(e" shall be made on Decembrr 24 af[c:r eight o ciock p.m. It shall be beyond the power of any municipaiity of this state to authorize or permit the sale of iatoxicating liquors when such sale is prohibited by this aecdon, hewever, any municipality may further limit the hows of sale of intoxicating C6aoges or additioas iodicated by underlint deletioro by sF�eea� '. f { � i. � Y'11� � .hrYn.t+§rtG:.Y1 • � ,yy -',�X ..-„,� � ii _ ' �a �r ti .� !.. � • i . • y a S. • *� \�� . .z �. .• r �.L7 L . . . � t�- , '�b'C.. r . :, t t . _. � � �. . ,. -. - `;,' = a . . d { : : ` � . ,,c Rv� a :`.�i` i , � y � � i"' ti "'>" ..;, ' y � * `.: x� .: a. � � � .. , ' �+Y`t � r . . .' S ` � . • . _ '�y, >¢ .� a"�� . .: . � . . ' t � _ ' ,�: a � . ''.l. ; .,t � i'. . ' � � . . .:. . .;s �. . .. . - .. . � . �. . , . . � . � �.- �- - . , . , . . , , . .. 'e � . � ._ . . ,� . .. .. _ , .. . � . - -.. .. . .. 4.. . . .. . ' . . .- .. �. . . . .. � . . .� .' ��. ." . . . . . : � . . s� .-. . .. ...'..,- ' ..� • .. . _ . ,..� . . . -..,�.� . .. . . �.'` �.. ._ . .. . .. ` . '� . . . . . . . .. �q'.. � - .. ' � . � . . � . � _ . . � � . _ �, .. . .. . . � � . .� � � ... � � F " � _ ! . , . . .s ♦ :. �.. . ? ' . . . �,. ,�_ ' �}'., ': � . . ff�� 1•t 4� � �,.(� y�,,.� ,��j ��e �p •H. u S . k ��R��iM�W� �'F� i.Y,+f� A.�1i�� a'a*I��f: 1 4 tf: .! PT'1�ni�.#Mlt�aY'!R"Jlti A'"_ w,`�.�;�t. Y�'\!�2 .,'��dr";l ✓ J+',�i�� yiiv.��i'+4:.q H�.�4 �T:�A).�khYf'.�i�,l�.'Y.A iWr�f1 �� 11� � 1� . i�)lr. . f.., � . ••�1 LI(?UOR CO�iTROL DIVISION C80 CEDAR 5TREET � ST. PAUL, ti!N. SStOi (6t 2? 296-6t 59 � V� / 0 � / ; ; f"` �`a n"�'� . P� y. f �'� `\ � �'r 1 ! �. �`�r �'' � �r � �Z.,,yQF M�Ne�%�i STAi� 0;= t�3iNi��U'�'A DEPART�!_NT OF PUSL,IC 5aFETY SA11�l1' r'�AUL. 5515S May S� 1R78 Mr. Alec Parkin, President Minnesota riunicipal L9.quor Stores Assn. 7200 Perry Court Eas� Min:�eapolis� Minnesota 55429 Dear Alec� This has reference to oux recznt discussion of Minnesota Laws 1978 Chagter 687 reZating only to that poxtion dealing with hours aad days of sale. It is our interpretation that tiiis amendmenL authorizes the sale o£ liquor at off--sale in zJ.1 ci.ties outside of a county which contains � city o� the lst class (aver 100,Q00 pop.) reoardless of the distance, +�o re�in open and sell, at off-sale Monday thru Saturday from $:OG A.M. to IQ:QO P.M. That alZ cities �aithin a radius of 15 miles of a city o£ the Ist class an� in that same county may re- . mai.n open and se1l at off--sale rlonday thru Thursday :�rom �iy� 8:Ob A.�i. to 8:00 P.ri. °. '' ..._. -' �:= - � . " and Saturday fron 8:00 A.L1. to L0;00 P.M. . �'xrv��" _ We note that local ordinances, zf any, wi.11 have to be amended to authoxize sales during these hours. This law takes ef�ect August 1, 1978, JAM:pm We trust this cZarifies the questiona Yours very trul.y, �OSEPH V. NOVAK� DIRECTOR LIQUOQ COi�TROL DIVISION c � � ..,, � �,,:y ,/��,�..��/i` ��G:�;�_ ��- -•John A. rluet�� • •✓lAssistant Director � 2F Q CITY OF FRIIJLEY PLANNING COI�ICSSION MEETING - AUGUST 23, 1978 , � CALL TO O12DER • Chairperson Harris call.ed the August 23, 1978, Planning Coumaission meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: �ichaid.Harris,:.Virginia..Schnabe3; Bob Peterson . Bruce Peterson, G�nnie Modig,.Ned Storla � Members Absent: James.Langenfeld (Bruce Petersoa representing), LeRoy Oquist (Connie Modig repxesenting) Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner _ APPROVE PLANNING CQMMISSION MINUTES: AUGUST 9, Z978: - MO'PIGN by Virginia Schnabel, seconded by Bob P�terson, to apgrove the August 9, 1978, Planni�ag Commission ninutes as written. Mr. IIruce Peterson stated that on page 9 of the minutes, last paragr.aph, regarding Mr. LangerYfeld's motion to recomm�nd denial of request by Woodcrest $aptisr Church to use Locke Park Soccer Fie1d, Mr. Langenfeld wanted to indicate tra� h�s strong opp�sit�on was not clz�3rch versus state, but the fact that the prime time was being takeri away from the citizens. Private organizati�ns should pay their share and be a parr of the first-come, first-serve basis. Mr. Harris sta�ed that the City Council did not appresve the request � by Woodcrest �aptist Church far use of the Locke Park Soccer Fiel�d. It was on a first-come, fi�st-serve basis. . Mr.•Boardman s�ated that Mr. Boudreau, Parks & Recxeatior� Director, " was working up a fee schedule to submit to the City Manager for compensation for use of facilities. , ;. . . • Mr. Harris stated that city programs took priority, but at other times, it was a first-come, first-serve basis. � UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINC AYE, CiiA I.�lMAN �K IS DE CLARED THE MOT IQN CARR IED UNAN IMOUSLY. 0 � . 3A PI,ANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 23, 1978 - PAGE 2 1. CONTINUED: DISCUSSION ON ENERGY PROJECT� COt�TTEE: A. Potential Members of Energ_y Pro_j ect C�umiittee: , - Mr. Harris stated that, as the Commission could see, they had onZy two resumes from two applicants for the Energy Project Committee. . He stated the resume from Mr. Sharton was very impressive. Ms. Schnabel asked how the Planning Coannission was going to go about finding more members? Mr. Harrisstated the next step was probably soliciting in the , community. . _ Mr. Bob Feterson stated that when the Parks & Recreation Cou�ission was setting up citizen committees for the park areas, they had found it very beneficial to go to the Planning Coutmission, City Cauncil, and the member commissions asking them to-list names of citizens who would be interested in serving on these`committees. From those sources, they had gotten well over 17Q names. He stated that might not be a bad procedure at this point. ' i � Mr. Boardman stated that the Planning Commission could submit a formal request to the City Council asking for aid in getting ' members for the Energy Project Cou�ti�tee. Mr. Bruce Peterson asked if the city had a li.st of people who had submitted resumes indica�ing an interest in serving on co�issions ar coIIUnittees? Mr. Boardman stated that the list was very meager at this point in time. Periodically, the city asked for volunteers through the city newsletter, but there was little response, Mr. Harris stated that �he Planning Commission could do as Mr. Peterson suggested--request help fram the City Council and - , �the other coumlissions . . Ms. Schnabel �sked if there would be any interest through the Chamber of Commerce? Mr. Harris stated he was surprised that there had been na response fram the service organizationse . ' Mr. Bob Peterson stated that he knew from experience with the Chamber of Commerce and the Rotary Club, if you wanted to get their interest, you had to address them directly or communicate directly , with them. . � ' ' Ms. Schnabel also suggested contacting the League of Women Voters and the Fridley Women's Club. �� PLANNING CO�A�ISSION MEETINGL ATIGUST 23, 1978 - PAGE 3 Mr. Boardman asked what the Commission's timetable was for the Energy Froject Cammittee?- Mr. Harris stated he would like to start holding organizational meetings no later than Dece.mber Lst. They had ariginaZ2y intended staffing by September lst. MOTION by Bab Peterson, seconded by Bruce Peterson, to staf£ the Energy Project Committee at the Planning Comanission meeting on October.4, 1978. . � Ms. Schnabel stated that Mr. Ande'rson and Mr. Wharton, wno had submitted resumes, should be contacted to tell them what the Planning Commission was doing, that the Planning Cou�isszon apprecia.ted their interest and wanted them to continue their interest, and that the Plartning Commission would be making their decision at their October 4th meeting. Mr. Boardman stated he would write letter.s to Mr. AL-�derson and Mr. Wharton. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, C�I.A IIt�'�Y.�'� HARF� IS DE CLARED ...THE . MOT Il�N . CARR ]ED UNAN 3MOUSLY. 2. DISCUSSION ON WORK LOAD SCHEDULE: Mr. Boardman sta�:ed he had been trying �o get something done on the work load schedule, but he had been working on the Zoning Code. �He stated that the Planning Commission would have t-he Zoning Code for revi�w at their next neeting. 3. RECEIVE SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL nUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: JULY 27, 1978: MOTION by Bob Peterson, seconded by Bruce Peterson, to receive the July 27, 1978, Special Environmental Quality Commission minutes. Mr. Bruce Peterson stated that the Environmental Quality Commission was in the process of preparing, with Mr. Ray Leek, a position paper in regard to the MnDOT Plan. . • Mr. Bruce Peterson state3 that it was the Envir�nmental Quality � Commission's conc�rn that there were so many unanswered questions in the PZan, that it was difficult t o make a position. In reviewing the minutes, the Planning Commission would notice that there were a number of basic questions that were unanswered in the Plan. Before the Environ- msntal Quality Commission could make a gaod input to the State on the � MnDOT Plan, the Commission needed to have soc�e of those questions answered. Mr. Harris asked if the improvements to the Anoka County Airport were going to be made? • Mr. Bruce Peterson stated that the upgradin� was scheduled. This was another question the Commission had: What.type of upgrading was going 0 PI,ANNING COI�Il�LLSSION MEETING, AUGUST 23, 1978 - PAGE 4 to be done and what type of aircraft was it going to be able to handle? The budget figure was $600,000, which, he fe1t, was not a lot of money for construction. Mr. Boardman stated that the Anoka County Airport was designed as an � intermediate airport. It only needed one more runway. The whole airport situation, as it was now, could handle intermediate air traffic. Mr. Bob Peterson stated they would also have to upgrade the tower facilities and exgand the hours of manning the tower as the tower was only manned on weekends at the gresent time. Mr. Bruce Peterson stated these were the Commi.ssion's concerns, because these things were noC stated in the MnDOT Plan. • UPON A VOICE V01'E, ALL VOTING AYE, THE MOTION CARRI�D UNANtMOUSLY. 4. RECEIVE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: AUGiJST 1� 197$: MOTION by Ned Storla, seconded by Connie Modig, to rece�ive the August 1, 1978, Human t2esources CoLhmission minutes. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Har�is:decl�zed-the motion carried unanimously. 5. RECEIVE COP'Q'tUNITY DEVEI,OPMENT COMMISSION MINUTES: AUGUST 8, 197$: MOTION hy Bruce Peterson, seconded by Connie Modig, to receive the August 8, 1978, Community Development Commission minutes: Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,Chair-r,ian Harris declar..ed the-motion carried unanimouslq. 6. RECEIVE APPEALS COP�IISSION MINUTES: ,AUGUST 15, 1978: A. Item 2, Variances for 534 Fairmont St. N.E. have to go t?�rough PLanning Commission to the City Council because of objection of neighbor. Recommended for approval by Appeals Commissian. MOTIdN by Virginia Schnabel; seconded by Bob Petersan, to receive the August 15, 1978, Appeals Commission minutes. '' Mx. Harris,asked what action should be taken on the item listed . ab ove? ; • � Ms . Schnabel stated that it needed no actiozt unless the Planning Commission wished to take action. , Mr. Boardman stated the item was singled out because of the objection of the neighbor. Mr. Harris stated that with all the property in the city being built on, he was sure ttiey would be seeing more and more situations like this. People were trying to stuff houses on everything thaC existed, no matter what size.. . A 3C 3D m PLANNING COMM.ISSION MEETING, AUGUST 23 1978 - PAGE 5 Mr. Harris asked Mr. Boardman what had happened with the situation of the 40-foor lots? Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Gordon Hedlund had filed a suit with the city. The City was putiting together a hi.story of 40-foot loCs for that case. � '� Ms. Schnabel stated that it was true that in that particular area, in the past they had permitted construction on lots less than 7500 ft., but had never gone down to a 40-foot lot. Mx. Harris stated that wY�at was imgor.tant was how the city was taxing 40-foot lots at the time the permits were applied for. If th� city was, in fact, taxing them as buildable sites, the city . could have difficulry c��ith that. If the city was only taxing th.e lots at a nooainal amount, then Che city had a pretty strong case. _ Mr. Boardman stated thaC, as faz as he knew, the city was net taxing them as buildable sites. - Ms. Schnabel stated she would like to know when the above mentioned courC case was going to be heard, because zt would be inreres�ing �o attend. She asked Mr. Boardman a.f he could infarnl the Planning Commission memi�ers of the date. , Mr. Boardman stated th at he would find ou t and notify the Planning Commission membexs. Mr. Harris stated this was probably a go�d thing, bec4use i"t would clear the air once and for al,l on 40-foot lots. UPON A VaICE VQTE, ALL VOTING 1�YE, Cii�iR.'�IAN H�A�RTS DECLARLD. �IE ri�T �i?N CARR 7ED t3NAN Z�IOUSLY. 7. OTHER BUSZNESS: � A. Mana�ement Plan fxom the Canadian Financial Corpo-ratian for �' Village Green• • MOTION by Boh;Peterson, secon3ed by Ned Storla, to receive the Management Plan for the Village Grean from the Canadian Financial Carporation. � Mr. Boardman stated that if the Commissioners had any questions or �. ' concerns after going through the plan, they should bring Chose concerns to the City Council. The City Council would be reviewing the Management P1an on September 25 at their conference meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE,�HA L�MAN HARRI� DECLARED THE MOT IDN CARR IED UNAN I�iiOUSLY. , PLANNING COMl�II.SSION MEETING, AUGUST 23, 1978 - PAGE 6 B. Innsbruck North: MOTION by Bruce Peterson, seconded by Connie Modig, to receive a letter to A. L. Messerli from 3oseph ,Alexander of the D.N.R. Mr. Harris stated he wished Mr. Alexan�er could come and take a look at the area now. If there was anything left there, it would be a miracle. Mr. Board�ian stated that the City Council had put a moratorium on the lots for ewo weeks until this response was received. .. Mr. Bruce Petersun stated he was concerned abou� that area, because he thought there were already problems from improper dredging and basement problems. • Mr. Harris•stated he had a discussion w;th Mr. Boardman and other staf� members to see if they could put some kind of attachmenC on the records telling people who bought the property, when t�Py came through with the tatle search, the condition of the property. He felt the people were entitled to that information. Mr. Bob Peterson wanted to know w,zy Fridley did not have ''Truth i.n Housing" in its Building Code. � Mr. Boardman stated that Uecause of the involvement with the Housing Maintenance Gode, the Planning Cor�anission ar.d the City Council had xecouanended not to get into that situation at this time. T�e Pl.a�ming Commission had wanted to see how the systematic multiple Housing Maintenance Code wor�ced before they go t involved in single family maintenance. Mr. Harris stated that, in any case, he.really felt that, although the subsoil may have settled enough for the structure sites, the houses on West Danube were bound to have problems with surrounding yards and settling driveways. Mr. Boardman stated that he too was surprised that they were only required to "muck" out for the house foundation. That may be one of the reasons why there were basement problems. � Ms. Schnabel stated that she thought the city had t4 take a good look at this situation, because wasn't the city going to be faced with . people coming back at some future time saying the city errored in permitting this area to be filled? Mr. Boardman stated that the city had to rely somewhat on the professionals. When an engineering firm came to the city and said they would do the work and the work was guaranteed, then why shouldn`t the city issue the permit? 3E �� 3 F PLANNING GOMMISSION ME�TING, AUGUST 23, 1978 PAGE 7 Mr. $ob�Peterson asked who was going to be�liable seven years down the li.ne--the engineering firm or the city? Mr. Boardman stated that if it came back to the city, the city would go back L-o the engineering tirm. Mr. Harris stated that he really thought that the�people who bo.ught the hocne, not even the first owners, but 3-5 years down the line, should be made aware of the situation under which the house was constructed and the area surrounding the property. He ti�ought it was the.city's responsibility to inform them. He did not know of any other way, but with an at-tachment on the title search. UP�N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTI2dG AYE, Cl�A IRMA.N HARR IS D�CLAI�D TH� MOT ION CARR ]E D UNAN Il�10U SLY . . MOTIUN by Virginia Schnabel, seconded by Bob Peterson, that the Planning Commission recommend to City Council that on tlie specific lots in question in Innsbruck North, as well as on future area problem developments in the city that might occur, that an �ttachment to the deed be required so that the buyer of a specific property, such as in tlie wetlands area, be made aware of the circumstances of.the condition of the building site. Mr. Bruce Peterson aslced how the city would def.ine problem areas? Couldn't they just stay as "any additional new housing"? There were . going to be borderline cases. Mr.:�iarris stated that would be left to the discretion of the building department. Mr. Bob Peterson stated that the citizenry would be concerned, and when they felt there was a problem, they would come to the city. UPON A VOTCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMMAN IiAP.P.7S DECLARED'.'THC MOTION CARR IET� iJ1�IAN IMOUSLY. • � ADJOURNMENT: . .. , MOTION by Bob P eterson, seconded by Ned Storla, tQ;.�djourn the meeting. iTpon a voice vote, all voting aye,.Chaizman Harris dec�ared_.the Planning Counnission meeting of August 23, 1978 adjourned at 8:45 P.M. Respectfully subm tted, ' tiC. C �'��..J yn Saba Recording Secretary a � � � )IUNfAN I21sS0U)ZL'f;S CUt-fM7SST.ON 1�'iT;I;TING, AU�UST 3, 1978 - p/��+ 7 Air: SL•or].� staL-ed tlzal- if they did send a communication to any business, they should actually tell wha� needed L-o be fi.xed, wiclened, etc. Ms. Van Dan stated that one comment niany h<lndicapped made was tha� they hated bei.n�; treated 7.ike �arUa�e by having to co:ne in a back or side door where garUa�e was thrown out or irei.�hL° was delivered. Mr. Flemin� stated that the City had provided handicapped parlcing and �� the depressed curbin� within the last- year. Alsv, a modest amount of money had Ueen appropria�ed so that all new eurbing wouJ.d be depressed. A certain amount of the old curbin� had been changed, with z goal L-o have depressed curbing throughout Lhe city. Mr. Boardman had told him that i.n 3une 7.978 the City had appliecl to H.i3.D, for a biocic gxant to study archi�ectural barriers in the city and to get moaey �o eliminate tt-iose barriers. Another point was thaC the Buildzng Inspection Division of the city was hard at work implementiing the State Building Code. As lie.under- sL-ood it, Chapter 55 of it spoke to this in �hat all new commer�cial and indus�rial buildings must Ue accessible to the handicapped. Another con- tribution the city caas making �aas by helgin� both coLUnercial and grivate builders to try to mal�e those buildzngs barrier-iree that were not now barrier-free. Ms. Van Dan sta*ed tl�at if the Czty had ac�ually applied for a D1ock grant and funding, this Co�nission should be involved. Mr. Storla asked Tir. Fleming to check on what the Ca.ty cvas going to do in regard �o the barriers in the Civic Center and also to find out more about the block grant. MOT".CON by Mary Van Dan, secarided by Mary Jo Dobsan, that the Commission go to L-he Target.5tore on 53rd Ave. N.E. L-o evaluate the remodeling in regard to architectu�:al barriers. If�the facility �aas not barrier-free, then the Commission would w7rite a letter with strong reccmmendations to Target. Upon a voice vote, a1Z voting aye, tt�e �;�oti.on carried unanimously. Mr. Fleming stated that if the situatian had changed and it was no�.a barriex- £ree, he thou�ht ttie Commission should �hank Target for eheir changes. �t was also part of human resources to be supporting. rf01'I�N by tiary Van Dan, seconded by Mary Jo Dabson, to recommend to � Ci.ty Council that if City Council. decicted to go with the transit servi.ces_ tha� one of the buses be a handicapped bus equipped with hydraulic lift and wheelehairs, Upon a voice vote, all voCing aye, the motion carricd unanimously. � �' �peala Commis:ion Meetin� ��St�� Page 3 3 u �� 1ir. Plemel staCed as long as there were no oh;jecCions and it is done in �ood tasL-e he can see no reason why thi� should noC be f;ranted. :1r. Earna agreed.. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna that this variance be annroved. l:non a voice vote, all woting; aye, Vice Chairperson Gabel declared tlle motion passed unanimously. Ms. �ab�l stated to the Glumacs that thsy can �o ahead and get a building vermit. The Glumacs thanked the Commission. ... . _ . .. . ... .. 2. PURSUANT TO SECTI0�3 205 OF TIi� FP.IDLF:Y CITY C�JDF, C. VARIAT?CE HAS $EE?J R�QIIESTI�D TO ALLGt•] THL: COi1STRUCTIOTt OF A H��US� Ar1D GARLIGE AT 53 +�FAIRTIONT STIZEET �I. E. TIIE DEVELOP"4ENT PLAIJNED IN�IGL�JES I:EllUGL�]G TI;� LOT SI'LI: FP.�� A?�1INI?TI,�T OF 7500 S�1IJARI: I'EET TO fi750 SOL'r�RE I� EFT � AI�ID '!.'HE ST.DE YARD SETBAi.I� FROA1 � F001 '_"IIPdIMUM TO S FEET OPI TF3E SUUTHEAST CO?'•_:;EP. OF T}lE HOUSE. � equest y ltamona Boisvert, $027 Quincy Street N.r�., Minneapolis, 2iN 55432} Ms. Gabe1 asked if 24s. Boisvert ��as nresent. She was and :1s. Gabel asked her to sten forward. . MOTION t�y Mr. I:emper, seconded by Mr. Plemel., to open the public hearing. �pon a voice vote, a11. voting aye, Vice Ch�iraerson�CaUel cleel.ar.ed L-he pub�ic hearin� open at 7:47 P.M. . t�D�dIP1ISTP.P.TI1iE STAFF RE�'ORT �34 Fair�nont St. N.�., A. ' �'UBLIC PURPUSE SERVfD �Y REQUzREF9Et�T: Section 205.053, 1, B; For.a lo�; on a pl�!t recorded befiore December 29, . 1�55, tf�e ininimum'lot area is 7,500 square feet. Public pur�ose served by this rec�uirement is to ava�d the condition of o�er croti•�ding of a residential neighborh�od and to a��oid an excess burden on the existing water and se�rer services and to avoid reductlon cf surrounding prop�rty valuAs. , Section 205.053, G, B, 1, Requii�ing a side yard sei;t�ack of 10 foot an the � iiving area side of t►3e house. . Public purpose served by this requirement is to main�ain a minimum of � 20 feefi I�etw�en living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet betrreen . garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce exposure to conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for aestheticaily pleas�ng �pen areas around residential structures. 6. STATED HARDSNIP: No other land available. Need variance to allo�� construction of home. ' ppp�a,�].s Commi.s�i.on Meetin� Auguat 15, 1978 P�� 3� ` C. �pi�lIi�ISTRATIVF ST/F�f' RE1�IC4J: 'fhe ��etii:ioner's survey shows that a 35 foot front yard setback is alloa�ed, hov�ever, to build �:he house shorrn, the Soui:t�east corner will encroach ap}�roximately 2 fee� into ihe side yard which�runs at anql�. With f�ield measurement;s shovring II4 feet bet�reen the housc at 49U i=airmonL and the garage at 594 Fairmont. There is room for a 36 foot ��Jide house tvith a theoretical clearance of 24 ft. on eith�r side bet�r�een the i:wo houses naw ther�, and the propased si:ructure. The City has granted variances in this area in the past far lots under 750fl square i'eet in area. Ms. Gabel asked if there was any one present in the audience for this item. Mr. Ralph Swanson, 511 �l}• Street, Fridley, stepped forward and stated he was interested in this construction. Ms. Boi�svert stated she had bought the house.rzext door to th? property in question and wanted to buy this nroperty also. S:ze had signed a purchase agreement on a contingency basi.s that tne variance would be allowed. She plans on putting a house and garage on the empty lot. . • Mr. Barna asked what she would do with the house next door. Ms. Boisvert stated she �aanted to keep it for a wh:.Ze. Presently it is rental property and she plans on updating it and eventually selling it. She s}�owed the ��r.mission her house and garage plans. Ms. Gabel stated she had spoken to the present property owners, who live next door, and Lhey want to sell tl�e empty Zot ta Ms. Boisvert. Ms. Gabel asked Ms. Boisvert if she could sav� the trees on the l.et. Ms. Boisvert stated she felt she could save most of them. Mr. Holden asl:ed hir. Swanson his opinion. Mr. Swanson stated he has lived in the neigtiborhood for 20 years and feels that lat is too small to build a house on it. He was concerned about it. He felt he would like to see the little huuse torn down and one house built on the two lots. . • M�`. I:emper asked what her intentions were on the existing house. Ms. Boisvert stated she would be upda�ing it and buildin� a new -� house next door. � Mr. Swanson stated his only concern was he felt the loC was too small. Mr. Ilolden stated there were many lots in the araa that size and • it is not unusual to build on a lot that size. Mr. Swanson stated the neighbors he talked to felt the same way as he did. ' Appeals Commission MeeCin�; Aupu,t 15, 1978 � Page 5 3 J � Mr. l:emper asked Mr. ^wanson if his nb,jection was thaC the lot was Coo sma11 ar the type of constr��ction Ms. Baisvert wanted to use. Mr. Swanson stated the house plans l.00lced good to him. �4r. Kemner asked Mr. Swanson what he would like to see done. Mr. Swanson stated as long as the 1_ittle house could not be torn down and one lot used, he would like to see nothin�; dane - the lot remain empty and the sma13. house remain as is. tir. Kemper stated another thing that could be discussed is the possibility of a lot snlit - picicin� up some �roper ty from the little house. � Ms. �abel stated the present property owners had thought about.that and they did not want to da it that way. Mr. I;emper asked Ms. Boxsvert if slie could deed over some proper.ty frorn the little house and transfer it to the new house. - Mr. Iiarna stated the little house lot �aas only SQ' �aide and could not be split. Mr. Barna stated another possibility was to derao2ish the little house and build oii the two lots. Ms. Gabe1 stated that could be �cne but the house would then be too expensive for the neigr.borhood. Ms. �abel asked t�is. Boisvert if she had considered a different floor plan. Ms. Boisvert stated yes, but this was the one that would fit nicely on that lot. 2ir. Kemper stated the question is - is the �iece o£ property i�uild- able or not. Iis. Gabel asked if there were any more questians or co�ents. Mr. Barna asked if Ms. Boisvert had considered � narrower house - liice two feet narrower. Ms. Boisvert stated there mi�ht not be enough living space then according to city codes. 0 � 0 . 3K ', , APpP.�LS COt�Q"[ISSTON MT:I:TING AUGUST 1.5 1978 Pncr b Ms. Eoisvert stated it migt�L be a problem Chen•selling the home because it wiZl Ue too smal.l. � A discussion was heZd on house si�e and how it would sit on the lot. , Mr. Holden stated he thought they did not need ail of the variance on the south- east corner, but they would need some o� it, so they caanted approval now, so they wouldn'L- have to come back 1aCer. Mrs. Gabel stated she had spoken with the Skotaks who would be affected by the southeast corner variance, and they had no objection to it. Mr. Barna asked Mr. SkTanson i£ he still objected to the housa being built. Mr. Swanson stated yes. ri0TI0N by Mr.. Barna, sec�nded by Mr. Plemel to close the public hearing on number 2 on the agenda. L`pon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, Vice Chairperson Gabel declarEd the public hearing closed at 8:20 P.M. � - Ms. Gabel eh-plained �o Ms. Boisvert that this item wi11 have to go to the City Council because of the objection. - Tir. Pl.emel stated he felt it would be more fitting to have one build�ng site. • Ms. Gabel stated it would be too ea-pensive a. house then. Mr. I:emper stated to Ms. Boisvert if sne knew how much the home would cost. Ms. Boisvert s�ated she dicl not have a price. Her former husband wou].d be the one to bui•ld the house and he has built homes for many years in the area. . Mr. i:emper stated even though there are some objections it is his opinion to have two nice homes in ttie area rather than an empty �ot and one existing ho:ne. Ms. Gabel asked for any comments or questions. Si►e agreed with wha.0 had been said. She felt it would be good for the nei�hborhood. : 1�Ir. Kemper stated he felt the property would eventually be built on anyway. Mr. Barna stated he had no objection to the lot size. MOTION by Mr. I:emper, seconded by Mr. Barna that this variance be approved. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Vice Chairperson Gabel declared the motion passed unanimously., Ms. Gabel explained ta Ms. Boisvert and Mr. Swanson that the +�ommission will recommend to the City Council the variance for Approval. It will go before the Council. on September llth. Ms. , AppF.AI,S COMMT.SSIQN 1�(I:I,TIPJG AUGUST ].5, i978 rnc� 7 ,_ Boisvert asked-if she could send a representative Co the meeCing because she wouJ.d be out of Cown. The Cammission inf,ormed�h�r�•that would be fine. NIs. Cabel informed Mr. Swanson that he can also attend the City Coun�il. meeting on September. .11th and he can noti.fy _any �ther interested persons to attend also. 3. P.t;OU�ST F�R A VARI�� AI�I��r�TTOrT 2,05 OF TtIF' FRTnT.T'Y �T� COnr�'i'n j�l.� .(�I? T}j} (n;�STRl;('TTQn� 11T' 11 NFIa A[]T�S?'_ATTn hTTA['uFtL GARAG� AT 4f+0 iiUGO STP.�F•.T N.E, A VARIAPdC3: IS REtiUTRED TO SET � �'HE HOUSE I3hCK 32 FEE'1 RAT1iEK T}I1�i�3 35 1'E1�T I�OM THE FROi7T PROPERTY LII1F, AND TO SET I7' �ACK 24 . 36 i� EET FRO`t THl? RI:AR LOT LII3E RATI�EP. THAid THE 25.59 FQOT SEiBACK REC►UIRED I3Y THE CODE. � equest by John Dcyle, President, �. J. Construction, Inc., 6305 East River Foad N.E., rridley, MN 5543�) MOTYON by Mr.. Kemper, seconded by Mr. Plemel �o open th�e public hearing. [Ipon a voice vote, all votinp, aye, 'sice Chairperson Gabe]. declared the publ.ic hearing open at 8:34 P.M. ' _ Ms. Gabel asked if Mr. Doyle was pxesent. Mr. �oy1e stepged forward. AD��1I�dIS?RATIVE STJiFF REPOftT 440 Hugo Street N.E. , A. PURLTC PURPOSF SERVED BY REQUIREMEi�1T: � SecLion 205.453, 4, A, Front Yarci Setback �of not less tha�� 35 feet. Public purp�se served Uy tl�is requirement is to allow for off-streei parkZng withoul: encroaching on the public right of way and als� for �aes�:hetic cor�sideratio►� to reduce the "builciing � ine o� sight" encroachment Yn�Lo the tle'ICjrbOt"'S fY'4Clt yard. � Section 205.053, 4, C, Requiring a Rear Yard Depth of not less than 25 percen�'of tihe lot depth with noi less'than 25 feet permitted or more than 40 feet rec;uired. Public purpose served by this requirment is to pravide rea:• year space to be used for green areas tivlzich enhanc� the �eiahborhaod. B. STA7ED Nt�RDSHIP: ' Request front yar•� setback to be 32 feet to canform with other homes on the street and request variance from required re�r yard of 25 perc�nt by 1.G feet. Tt�ese t��o variances Yri,l] allow hon�e of future buyers ci�oice ta fit on the lot. � � 3L Mt � ti�T� . M � if ��+ ��r �•R.- .+ ,.) � y:�?3 X =. � �t•.�: j .. o -.-Tr � ,°:.+,tn.A 1' �aI <� t r< �..5�� ,�t'4✓ �,a :. . . b: , ''r`.� . . r' ��7 �,. � ,k iy�� b . t t ! •. %',.+'' -.� :vi . ... . �. ...t� "lc,r. ..•i.r...n.Y sv �f��.^ til�_k'•c� 4�,%.:.Ty� �i�Y, �'i� �r + �a�.: � r�� s.3�r s.f. 1•O+. �P+:.y �. {... .t � .. . ..f-�:i-ry . �r�',sy.��$ r .�_ s .. ... �� .ti•.- 1i �� ` t�r �t... �<t-� � / . .. � �� , � .�.�,c .f ..t.- ti '� .w'� � �.'• �` � • .. • � � . _ 1 �1, � � .. �.�'+y�il y � 'aQ�y � �.: _' � e .i, � � L. 1 �r RF . ll � �n > iF. � .' � � vy i`. 'Jr iu�'= I i �, io,tiy_f � �'M:yafi+i.� ' i � ,rl - ' - +r, � i� �T i �i' f '^�� 'S.:1 .�JrtA°'i��'lf,v�^`�i;+i . � � rTA'y �.N�'4 �/ et��'.�n .�.`r. � � - - . .:'�� s ✓ � . �6': A � . - � � �:�� rt �� a : , L �` � '' ar�; . � � i 'St:.`'- � -� t �`� P�w ti!1[ }j�" y�/j / .��.T-i;y+• �-t �:' . ,. " � i�� r '?i��;/ � <'"i. 7i� ':� l�i� ti ./cYi?,/�,/:� f:'� t, � . .+' ... ;f�• '� � '� '�� t.� Y_ , Qi)' .~ , ;OS��i'f j � i.+4�P.; • � I: �~ 1 +� u�.�.l[ << 1� - . ,~ � . r :•' y S "' `f+�• 1 " � 't�q.� �-.V. �.�.; ~ 'f . ! �q.'� �q . �*-. : . , � . � ,��,. �� a ]iM14'* � . � �.�:- ��. :a,yr ...-+,1� ��Y"�.I�'�i'�� ..' r�jj� '� �+ �i� _' g� •a-y ^.a.0 -1' f�.. .�.: � " �'��y.��AiG��'o� ,.�r��TL;=.<,. - � . .��i.. i k � •• ` ,�.��.�:�� 4 r 1 ' � � �'� � r V � i � r `�� _ � ��• � `�. �••� • . � 1'� yt �? '� (.'. .. �`. •..2� -„'�w..,�,...�a � . } j � . i.r f�-�:� _ ':_��.--�� L .. � :. h , t..'� .L ',a. . � •. ... ... . . . � . . , 'i :. .. ..� � , �..� � • A i }; �� • � T. . , � � .� . _ , � � �_ ,�� ti,:s � �-• r �.� - . 1�27 HARRi�T`AV� , .' � ' �� b11ANEAPOUS. MIttNF.50?A� ' a ; r --� � S�+ , � �.i , . . . '� i� 9. � S J • . ' '. v � s �i :a�r .L. ♦ �.�.I � � - • � / � ~L '�< _::� A � � 5 t k A,.-�-.�,'�` A`. . f.r�a,�'.�. 4�..� j. , ►n :. . � . � -. . / �� K..� � ,r � � «.. . �� s, .�.- � r � . . r ^Cr � i '-n � 'l � f r°, ' ' f 7 F. � K�?' `..cgc °`; ° � g 1` S ' r-' w i�,�'� �:' ri� j; os �T�s t� '.:', .e ' t � �. Y J �� 1 .. f �' 4= �q •4 �� i 4 � .. . . ,' �` f.- .... .-"' y sei+.w --.,�rT 7�" :' � .^ �7"� r t �� ..��< x'� S�'etc _ ^'nr 5 .-;� � .Y'`K.� � .� fz� � ., ja ti�� --:, - ''a..�"T� ^+*t� ` �+.0'i � r � .... ��! � !' S1�> i�y�: i+._.`J .Y �.b..:�.Y �T ,s!'.. �:�� 2 �r�4�= �":,. .J S��# . .- :..�. x '.- . ' , � . � �; . ` � � � � � �� y� � � � �. � � � � ILif1' � � �'�'� r � �_.• ' ) a.�r � � �. � � �. . 1 .l� i .+. a ..� .4,r''-� �...Z"` �rJ� t';. � . . . � . ,� { . �.. t �•• . -2�„ �.,.,f� . r v �� Fp, . ��- . �= � � Fo�-`:�- _ Pe�e�� °��lanez�`c�- (�-�: K�{ �.�,-y��f -�� .`--�-� ��.;..� ¢�,� , - �.�� - 4 , �.. ' 4 r , ��,� '"�'�,.s a. .'. �-?y -c � �,. j"' � �. � . r � ,n . � _ � f �rA s � F�'�s L4�. ��,,.• � +: J �. � SA � . y ^�t .. . • - � . /\ �� c � � -�' . � t .�d�" .s � J� � " ? •ir. . ° ."f"ty �s +M1 r1Y 7 >a`r �Y � tS l � �.�� . - �'1 �-� '� y. ; `R a � :� .��.� �a. � ° �.�� \ �" ��'� }•Y'i; 3ti t "'�-i ~ '�� a. � ��q.�.`fi,� V. �q.'tj ~'tiL`+`c,�`�;. '.^� �. Y . ' M ..�....j \. , � : � -A �- ` /..' � ^ J'. Y. 'i' � T� . �? . , tiS lE A {�v : . 1 tC . C.. �� 4 . r. w1 < i� � �� .�. - � :.w .w .v w � ' �- � r t f' .'r f V a " . . /1 .: -'M j N . i °F s� � -`� w� �S �3'�'�.9A a+.'+'.. _._, _ � : � .� •a _ ' v. +r= tr+.. ' i � � . . r- � � .y. � � �� ] - . .s %+ �+.,/i� � � � . c � t.,. !_., .. :.i� . . i-- �-��_ � �r .t, _ �r �'��C';.' ; � •�.� �. �, '�y nyi ��~{�i�G > lr;� 7G{t�. -S x,,.M .V . . T R „ . / � .. . `r ,,. f�i� l ., � • Y t .'` J �Y' � i �. r � � > ' - .. . . . � . _ } � t . : _..., ' ' ��A `l � . . a. .��.+ f � � � �r } t « � r '� .1� "f s �^�, F "� r'' "a 'F , +; `, . .... ^�lv -��p - f � �. 'i .R �, �f'�T,� � . �j�G . ; . RM ; : � , � Z �i: � IJ� i ... _, i4 . � ', �� '-��"-�� •"��s r �_t7 µT t.--.? '' S ��r� :t�„�, � �F Z 7''�. � f D��/"� 7 � ''' r = r� t,: � _ ,. _ A� . T � I�' ��(� ^ . i � � i ./ � ,� 1T. � � , � y � �S�h� . ! r � I V�f � -• � ; � �'� .r Y ;1��.�, v � �t ��T � - .. "_� � : . � •. •. � : • , - L ` - � � . ' � r9 ' ; } dt�OJ�} r .`� ` � � `- - - •: `. � r.. �d�y` � R — , - '+• ' f ' . , �. � M f, ., � _ �' � +� r � ` '7 � •' c".. � i �i � . � _ - <.� ., �� ,.1, , , _ _ .'. � - --- � � z � � • . �', 01 . . �� : _ Ui�.i �� ' rct' > tx: '�� -t: :. ._ . . � - , +:--'' � �;v,r , � � � `g �I��: �C . � . � ; . : - _ , �:� _ � . '. '': �a::.i:�:G 3��^, � ,- EXS`�iS;tG '�:u9. . ; . .__ . _ ; . ; � �: " ';, � �A � •.,�,v., �- �" s �� . DE�RI PT! C�N: L� �s 4� ar�d 49, we h�reby certify ihe boundaries of if any, therea�, l BIoc�C J,� River - � �� - � -.� � � .. -i�. . . . . . . . .2- "+3. ' � �� - "�, _ . . ... - : .. .. , � �R�Dl.�4',�EA�-S :� . g�p�p �� F .,� � �-� +t� .; - �� - i `�� a ' _ � �;ir�� "� � � � �i - , . , . . � .�- M��IN� DATE-- ± - � . . � Scale.�� ''_ _� 30� .,�. . . _� . . li � l q'N C �._'�'3-r �ye . . . ": - _ Q ��- ' �: = - . ``F`�`` . ,� � � s�DF y�¢,� Q - � � � . � x t 1'i�w He�gh�s,.. Anoka County, . � . Minnesa±a. . �� thaf this is a true and correct represeniotion of a survey.of the land above described and of the location of ail building� and a!! visibte encroachment • 'f ofed this 16th day Ho.I 14g5 {{Book . , s, t any, from or on sa�d land,.� of June � :�1971 . �GAN, FiELO b NOwAK � � ° � ' � Surveyors /J � � N o 1918 — 6 2� ...: b y�..p l��.a �,,t ! i �! �a.�r . . . . .. . . . . . . . . _, . , _ . :,.,, ... �..• ..-•.... .... ._ • r.._ .. y MEMO T0: Dick Sobiech, Public Works Director MEMO FROM: Jerrold L. Boardman,rCity PlannPr MEMO N0: DS #78-45 MEMO DA1"E: Sepiember 6, i978 RE: Paratransit Proposal Attached is the final proposal for paratransit that will be submitted to the City Council at the September 11, 1978 meeting. Although the final proposal lowers the Gity's cost to approximately $l0,OQ0 to $12,OQ0, the system would drastically suffer in services provided to the citizens. The first proposal for dial-a-ride for targeted groups would be a low usage system that would service only a small portion of our.total population. As noted in the proposal, this system would not be available to �he genEral public or for a long service day. Any expansioi� of �he system to include more groups or increase service times will incre�se the over-all cost of the prog�°am. _ The sec�nd proposal, the shared-ride taxi, wculd also be a low usage system, based on the nature of the proposal. The higti fare leve7s and the availability of �he automo�ile and other transit services would discourage, ridership. We would again be looking at tf�e primary users of this system ta be ti�e economicaiiy disacivanta�ed and wauld therefore be also looking at considerabl_e subsidies in o•rder to bring fares down so the handicapped and elderly can use the system. In summary, I feel we are drastically reducing th� service to our residents with this last proposai in order to brir�g it into budgetary constraints as laid out by the City Council. The service that we would be providing would be very limited �nd would only affect a very small portion of our total population. I don't feel that we would be getting the type of system that we need to promote ridership, or that the lower cost of this system would be beneficial to residents due to loss of service capabilities. If we do go with a paratransit system we should then look at some of the earlier proposals in which we would be providing a higher service level for general public use. JLB/de cc: Ray Leek ., ' � �.��.�'i�.��%� ��%��.� 9 �.�.'. August 15, 1978 '�� '�• 4 A !! /��5 l-��Y� � Mr. Ray Le�k, Planner City of F"ridley 6431 University Ave. NE . Fridley, Minn. 55432 Dear Ray : � rnclosed zs a memo presenting information a� requested by the City Counca.l. Davic� wi11 be out i:here in 2 weeks (Aug. 28, 29 ) . � ' If there are any questions before then feel free to call. Please distribute the memo to the Council members. Thanks. Sincerely, . �/��i ��.�2,{s?e�vst�tl�.n. . . . Dan Fleishman Transporta�ian Systems Analyst 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge� Massachusetts 02138 Phone (G17) 864-5810 . , • - . . 4B ,� . • �`��.��.��,T ��s��, i�..��.ce. . - � . . n�au��. �, 7��f� • - � � . , . . . TU: Citl of I'ric��ey • � • � , . FFtOS•� : Dan �'? e i sh*n�n '� • �:�,: Ca_t�� af Fri��1�y P�ratcansi.t ��n,on:��ration : : . . . . F i. l e: I�:�'DO^ . Tt��e nuv�se of t��is rrie;�o is to preser.� charar_teris�ics unr? costs of alter.native tj�pes of lo�a c�st �aarat?-anGi.t �er��i.ce a�tions .c•�1:�z^:1 GCL;I.�2. i:E ir;:��r,�entec: k;_v �.��. city c�� I?.ri�Iey. PresentPC? . �f�r r.or.si_c:�_r�tior.� ar.� �c��c al�e-r.atives achici� are verv �i£f�rc:nt ' XT! t>r:i.�21t�? t? 011 � 1�f't �'%?1Ci1 ��t.11.? �e the � c??iG' i�c.'tS'_C . � (Ger:«nc;-re�nonsive) GFrV10E` COt?GF'Ut: , • • 1. �1 .i0:•i^fc 1'-.'�.. r�lc��.—u—i_ l;'� ..�'-.��5�?I:�� L%l.ti� SE?CV.�:CE' �Vc�.13 c+J.'�.E� on].y to a t�rg�t grc�ap (i..e. , el�er�y and ha;�c;i.caa�e;:) . 2. � stzare��-ric'e taxa. sjrstr:,�, v��zth a azgi� le��n1_ �f service � ' and e:ith fares se� sa �s ta recav�r a m?]Gt portion of (i€ not u�l) o�eratir.g co�tr., : . - - The prilasooi�}� �el�ind tt�ese t�•�o �1 stems c!i.�fers mar�;e�Zy. Tl:e . L-ormc�r r_ epre�ser_ts a soci �l service ip tl�e farm oi s�ib� ic�i zec� tran.,�oztatian for a par�icular �r.�zns��c�rtat?on-di.saclvantage2 gr.c�un-e.g., tr.e e�.�^rly �nc': h;;r.�icap�ed. S�rvice i5 cFf.c�reci . � •. onJy ta tri.s grou� because oi fi.he �imitec c�:pacity uf�oi-c?eC . y • OT1�V tW0 VC'i�].Ci.P_S {p�C�l oneratir_c,T g�'?012L"��C'i:�'} . �;GS�S F1rG �Ol•i � because o� the l_c��•r num��er�of v:-�iic�_e-i�ot�rs; reven��s ��JiI? h� � � Ii11T'.2Tii:�fi C:l1C tC� �Cir i�zlt i ci1� �0;.7 L'1Ci�.'I"Sjii.� ��c�I�.S. t1i)1$ ... sy�teM coi�tr��t earlicr �lternative� ci.scuss�d cai.th t:ze city i.n �i?e?� �'n�:V10E' �.� t?C?� e"'.Vdi.�.e?��t' t0 t}:C' CJCI'_CiG�. pll�3..2C or fOr e: Xc►r_g "servi.ca c:.�t�" . ) ' . Z'j2E'. St:^2:fC'.-ric',e ��:.°.7. GC�2Ce�t 1S CS�C'.T]�l��a.�.V <�7.i:ll?ii �•.t 7.T(l1a�C?Vli?C� �^CCPCE'1�1.�.1�,� �f?r0l,lc�C: ll�e af �.r; exz.ctir.g ^�ec.�e - tl:e ��i. F;y , t'l�.a.Qi�iXClC7 C.i�iP-�Silc�rl.f!�� 3XE'c :iC�.'.lE':1�:�?� .�Q::�`!' �:�lc�.[2 tt'.OSC �CL" ' exclu� ive r�.c?es can� bP charg�<< r�i ti��u t s�cr z f icinn r^venue . • S:�4reG-ri�?c �are� ar� ccT�putcc� :c t.izat revEraues �.�ill c�v�r all, or at le�� Z�rr,e Fcrticn, cf CT1C!'c^..t.ir,g co�.ts. ' ,. , 1050 Massachusctts Av�nue Cambridge� Massa.chusetts 02138 PhonQ (61?) 86�-5810 . .. w..�...... . ... . �.-......._..............w��.�-..., ....ti��w..�..p..�-..�.. .........�.-��c.....�..� ,�...a. ,...».«..��.�......-_..n-�.,�.v...--ry.i,.,�...w...........w.�.........m..�r+��++.�.�.►..+..... .. ♦ �!�re�yr« � � � yC Sr-.rvice z:; e:i:en�i.vc (18 hour.:/clav) , anc: thc: nur.��er of vehicle-hours is tleyiblc s�o a� to r^,uL-ch the lcvel of c?emanc;. F�!xns i.n such a system c�^..r. !�� r�:ther high �or certain groups; it S.s �oss9.b�_e (�;s a T!lu�ti^C oL- �?r.licy} tr� .�ub�ic3i.ze t.:� ri?es oL- 'an el.c)c,rl.y an�l l�anuical�;�ec� pop�a].a�zor. �e�ment. •rhis *.nemo c:etieribcs the pr.opasec: �ysten:s unc� presents er.pECt�r1 casts and perfer^�ar.ce characteri �tics. Ir. ].iqt-:� o� the czty's � buuc�etary cons�raznts, it i.s a��umed in t?�� ensuir.g da:scu��icr. th�t ��vhirhevPr sl �;i:em is ac�.o�ted, r�ar.a:rem��nt �•��11 b� contr.actnc� ovt tc� a nriv<-�t� oper�-�tar se±ecte�� throcia?� a cam;�etitiV� aic' nr_ocess, The c�e-r_ating cost un�ae�_ � p�i�lic � , T.lc�.l'2 a.`.7L'^?F.'I�t sc:�e:�e �d].)_�. %G' c S :C�I..CrI c15 �Q u i17.C��ZC-� {:i�uTl that lailCiE'.L" �7I�IVc�.t° O�?�?I:c"'.�7.C!? lc,nn �-n�DT"t c{ �',��atr.::`_�:��' n, ^`_:c^..i�::c t.1C:,� �.O r'rl.C':!.e�� Clt�j COl?i!!�1.� .Jll� j� j? }. Fc�r j?rF?SG!1t �Lt��JJ��':i� �Gu�l�: ..�. costs aze as�u*!eci to i�e �mc�ertZKer %�y the ci.ty (:-rith • • s�.g�i.fic«nt state assistar.ce) an�� equipmc�nt p�rchases are :. acccunteG �or c'uiinq the first vear ot service. .(`!'he term� of the sta�e c�er�onstrai.icn ma',:e it r�.ore udvar.ta.geous to the ci�y t� �ur.c!ia�e canii�al. ec�ua.p�!:e?�t .�,�r�ng the r:e�or.stration yeur. � T1�Q carts to a�_1 �?l':�1 3C secticn-s-ca t�� anC state-is t?�o • . s19.gl�tly cheap�r ov�r a 3--5 yea.r perioc� if ca�ita3_izati.or_ is � un�;erta{:en hy the pub�.ic sectr,r. ) . � ' � � .. . .r .. : . ]. .. A].i:ernaL•ive �:ystr.m Cor�cepts . Ui.a1.--.�-Pa.c�e f_or. the Eldcrl.�c' i?�r.�iicap�Frd �a. �Fr.vice Ch�ractFr. ista.c � ' � Th.zs s�stem wouJ.0 provic?� �aoor-to-��ror. tr.ansportation (t,�ithin.I'rici].el) for those resic,�nts vf l?ridley t•�ho are � either c�ver t'r.� age o� GO or han��ican�ed. S2rvi.ce �%ould be provi.dec? by 2.12-pas�senc�er E�ar.s, c•;i.t•.h a tl�9.rc? vel�?cle avai?abl.e as a soare. (The vehi.cl.es wzll not, hos•�ever, be ec;uippr.a :•;i.�� „he�tcl��.ir. J.ifts, si_r.c�. �u:.h vehiclea :•,il�. .saon be avai lab? e to Fr idley re� i�3ents tt�lrougt� P.roj�ct � rlabi 1i ty .) The sys tem ��ouZd opera te 8 t�our s/day, t�ionclay thrcuc�h Satu.r�:ay, and persons .•:an�zr.a service r�oula cal? �the c'ispGtc►zr_r at least :Q �iours in aUVar.ce of the c?esired pi.c�:-up ti.me. � b. Fare . ' � _ T.he fare �•:ouZc� be eith`r 25� ar. 54G pe,: �assenqer. � 2. Shar. ec.�-�ic�e maxi � .a. �ervice c'zaract�ristics . �This system <<iou1G provici� c�aor-to-c�oor transportati�n . .�,*zthzn Fricl]_ey for anjone �esirinq scr_vice. Sezvice c•roulc.� . be provic?ed Uy sedans - ei�:�er exist,ing taxicaUs ar new vehicles nurchased •by Frialey. T: e 5ystent �aoula aperate 18 hc�urs/ciayr 7 days/ti�:eek. T�:A numbei of vehieles in service ' at on� tzme �•10��.�.�? d�:penc? c�n ti:e l��=e1 af clem�znd; based c�n �: dema7d �rc?j�cti�r.s � this waul.0 entail at �east 2 and not �. � r,!ore th�n �: vehic�es. Service �;oulc� be pzovicled on an i.mm�ec;zate rec�uest basis. • . � . . b. Fare • . ,, � Tlzt Fare �trucrur� Lor i.,�is Sy::tem is a cri�caa�. @�.@Is�C'J1C i.n i.t� oner�L•i.on; If the cit�� is to �voiG he�vi.ly sttk� �9.c�izir.g tf�e service, � rever<<�e r,�us�: cover all (c�r at : _ 1Fast a subs4�ntia:l �ortian) of the aper��ing costs. � Bec�e.�s� ride-sha�inq wilt crc�ate g�e�tAr pruuucti.��itie� _ . (4-G p<�sse»cters/v4hie].�-hoe�r) than ��i.11 exc:lusive-riding � . . -1- i , .� 4D . v...w._.�..,,,....�_.,..,.r„_�.,'...._.....,,.:..:._,.,...r.._..._....,-......,..,..».__.�.......-,»...,.....,.._.•..�..t......r,.,_...r..�»�...,.,....e•--..-�.... _•__. _ � ..r_�.._�._.T,,,.�,�.,_ w..-�•�..'!� `w1..�w�� ^ . .. • ' '� . ; , � I � • � �E 4� (gencr �ll.y 7-3 �assen�er.:lve��icle�-h�ur) ,.r ic7e-yhar ing f-� r.cs . •wiJ.�_ nok have t� r�� a� high as �hose L-or exclusi.ve-ride L•axz to gc��er_ ate r,o;�parab].e lrvels of revenue. '�he dif-�erei:ce i.n the i.t•ra fare level.�� is a�unction c�L- �he � � ogezatir.o cc;sts of tl�e �h�zi�er�-ri�:e service, •the e:�pectecl . �,eve1 oL- sh� rec.-ric:�e patronage, Gi�cl l-he level_ of . . SUL)SlUZ2Fit1011 ,t.17� city is w1.11.ir.q to uear. . The :,harec�-ric'.e f��re al.so denencls o;, iios•r it is to be drSE.'SSP.C� or: a r•:,ilc�°c� :�as�:s, �1 ZU11f-�:�, ar c�y flat �ar�. It '.is :�uc3c,ester? th«t I'r i.i��ey e�,t«bi=si� a zona.l Lure structure, as folloc,Ts: �he city �vould be su;�divic�ec, i.n�o 10 zoi�e� " (see c7i�gram, ne�:t p�ge) . Fares ti•�oulc, be charqe� acco�ding tci thc unnes oL- az:igin �,na ccstin�EtS.on. �he raa�riy- on paqe �6 si�oers; 1 zcrial f�rc� �truc�ure, i.n �.nicn trave� �:�.tl�in .�ny � zar.e, costs $1.00, travel bet:.�een adjzcLnt zai�es is $1.25, an� so Lorth, un to a ma1i.;�um fare o� $2.75. To �ake th? s . �h��ec1-ric'e systern financi.a]_ly fe�sible, an average fare of : appro�imately $2.00 �•lou2d Y�e necessary. The proposnd fare strueture cveulc�, hovefu? ly. Gchieve that level (si.nce . current ta:ti travel inforr�ation is unavailab�.e at this tirne, t�ze ave�age fGre anci trip i.ength car en].y be roughZy ap�roxir�atec�) . If it c?oes not, the fZrc� may ever.tualty have to be raised s3.igt�txy. � 7.'he fare for e:lclusive�r:ide taxi (b�sed on Columbia �� Heiqi:ts Ca�, Con��any's rate) is $1.35 f_or �. 1�-milc tr_ip, $2.05 Lor 2-rai�es, $2.75 i:or 3-mi�.es � etc. (i.e. ,&5� �� inztiall� plus 7Q� a mi�e, plus, generally, a tip). TIIUSr the �r0705Cri slzarec-r idc� tu:;i (�or �ti•rhich tip is incluc?ec1 in , the statec? f�re�� c•roulc7 be sxqiiifican�ly ].e�s exo�nsivc � �(10--25°) than ttie curr�nt taxi service. ^or CeCtc1?21 arCll�S • � �10��C'V'�`C� evcr. t�)C' S:�c',rl�C':—ri��e� LGrE fiilil JE` V1,E'WEG �:iS Zl matter c�f Cocial�polic1�) as too higli. Tt�e city may �,�ant to sub aidi.: � el.clerly anc� hanc�icap��E�c' r ic�ers, by al�.o�ti�ing them to r icc: for rec?uecd £ar�:-> (e.g. , 75G belo�� .regular fare) . � -2- _ . � i SH71R3? D- RI DE TAXI LONES � ,. ♦ v �{�.ir,z;.•.(r*r�t.A�'.i�+l,.s:�.: ::1 LIILC!J_i!CL[r v '� � , +j`. `,�•r. :;YI ,� �. ... r•.• ...�� , ,. r ,�`• . 1 . :-� •.,�, •� , �. :.; :,: __._ .:; .. ..!._;_�, :, � . ��.., ., :;.: .>.;,: • .�.� _.;: � __._--� ; '. •,•�._� .. ��.... ».. `� :�;i;,:.... .�: � �::.�� - :. . �; ' i •. _ �={�. � .T . _ o: W, ' I , -�. ;�� :(' � --:+, r� ' '"'"';��_ �.� =''ti, : ..l" ti � ,� .. `,�� i��::: ' # ,� ^� ' ; .", ' „ ».-, ._ 3; " .2' � , � � .. r.L:k, ' _ ~ ��,�� -__ •+ •- . , _' ,..:�•F� ,,,_ ., _ �`:,:c:= .��- � =ra�.;�'�:��`��`�� ,� ti `i' ; _ - .�. _� a � `i t_.r�l. ~ \�.� _t;�l *.�L" � '" � � :i" .. a � i . i ��l t,l. t; �, �, �, ,�,�;.. �-.... / . , \ f w, •�: �� \'` \I y�i'�'.:{ [�. I': �` �ii j . i• ` —_ ��' ��?��'�" f'r�%L; � y 1 . � . �� •�</y� i. �'- �; ''_, �ti ~'! ._.��. , _ s.r'+ s[t � . � 1� •ri� n ;I ':� ~'j j 1, � �, t; j_ ',� �• .i � . � . - i � "r 1 r _ � �' =1s'! r � - � i �b1r � �,. \ �c w 1 ."I .i ii _-��t n{jI� ,--~}^ . • d� \t�'�l� •1 �/�� f .��. � i- ( r ��_y_: �_ ---f«P J � �- r e � ti \ ,Sr'" \�\��''/_ � ! ,.�T` � ��,��i'��'-,! �� _r`' ;; ,j _ �•� �.L: 7 ��_• " � �- "�%�._ / �=-Jtf�1 a i F < < �� t.- ^� 1 �};� _ , !! !'� ''' >. r ,.l i k ,.>.�� 1 ,�, t N �:-• ;- ; t� / '' �' �-._i �� ' � , _.� __J � �kYk j' � 4' � �� r t I-�. . ; � ��' _. r--/i.l, l !�/_� � � ;��i`,'y'��_� .��:�1 C�� 6�.. r_ -:�_ `: _ _•�=' W �. =1 / � �!.'-�,..�' ' ' / _ ~--- - � ^� :_ �I � / � .' 3 _; ' � �✓ '; �.. ' ' ' �',,}� � � _ �:" �,1 � f_= �! •�. — �: • (1 ° � s i l � ,� f � ':� � : n F -<-i---� i � ',��;�::x�.!•' �j � 1{ � , _ / / Ir ;��.i ��'='�-'=�' :��c'••,;'„ 7 • .,= �' �� ( ( � ' _� �l~ �,� `�:i�.z._.i it(� _ :��.�. .;`: • .��.•:=,.�:��...n_ + `~ +. , � f •��' . 4 �r ;�''�y ✓ rf�\,�r I-,' , -/�•�� t':"--=, % ! fYc ' �; :� :,,� f `h^ '�� > �� 1! `� / fj/' l'"�i � -��\� , � � ` J�y�--L- � ry "' Y � �.,._:��'�� 1� 1. I / -"-T_ l� 4. ti.. � y .-7� c • � ! �j� ��, I �� ` "'6!'�� ,'� � :�� t I; � , ; �L}�;. t � j�' f � ,-^,.f�'?�'�J-- . � � ��(� �� 1i.:i��P P / �!L � . �� ..r 3 i Ji i', r� � � � .— �_�s"f 1('� �' � ,C" t. .,�"�..` ��"'If""g_. .y ��1 . ,- � .� I�� '7 ` N "_._.-,. ..� —' \� i1_. �JF_.,,,,r::=,-L_�l i.—A--(,:-�, � 'J�I �_J� . ��L'J� �=a�� .1�1 IL'L-. � ' ,` <<�i�l� '?� � il t _ — �` -j �� iI!�� i;�� r !�i i�'/ :'rj. ' i i � .-�-�r �c_: ��- ; �,, :�,►,�' �, ;, ��,{ � ►, �� , �! �� ,( �� '► ` ;; �1 . i f � �=_ --I:f ;_ �,� ^�` -- -�:t_ - =,i I�: �i =-i,^��` ��L-_.1-r�t_ _ �_c�a'� �`,..-) `�";�,-} 'I.. ^ . � ; � L;�� :f — "� : �, 7 �� _� ��-� _ -�;�. ��-�� .: . � I� ' _ �C.-_.Ja�. � `-1f i �� _ /4�� l .'� ) ::`i.�-�. � j."`�'v'-�` il�� `� \ I I f' ';., `�� 4.1,-? � If Y� 11 1` r�s� � ��F-- %� c iJ � � _ �� i � �l-� (,, - � u{ t �, rt i� �l _ t�.;,s� / r L�:�:. � � . 1 �I� ��`� I �1 � � I �� -; �• � ,,��;;�//.'�� ; �; � p .. I - � � � �I � ��LI t:�..J.� � �� -1 ��a�` �� `'� �� % • �. .:�`. �� -, �1 d F �- .;:% i.,�___�.�.r'� -C � r j� f � �� 1 r f �i� :: ��lF L� �� I' i! k �'-r ' �,%/i�t .�_�' r:�r�` . t y_ �'- . � �� ( -�. % �-�.='��--,:�;�` ��;.._r-:.; �I�� .�,;�T s- -� �, ;�� li.,, ,� 4 ;�:s �.., - , % F.�``��-�', � ,�-��i��`i� �'�' _ ��.:,-``_'��,�; �--�:�_�, ��...�` ;..;; ,.;, i• . �c � '�� : �� / -��..�-�;F.�-_.�� - 0 1 . _ � �: � `�` t ` '�� N I ��f _ �}___ `'_`} -\ �7 � t ' _ � _-,�_�q � L . f � '� J(.� ` �- � � - w }�,�T 5.,� �`�' �;�'��L1:i .�=;-: �r..., �'` � ,�;;~_ ��.�•�S � !. f � � / \ �.� `S . ! Y � �\ t � � .`J � � .y .._ ,� I � C "l /�. �,l 1��1 I� t �r�r"�, _ � � l_; f n � . � ,; ��,��-i� ., ,. � -- -.,-;_ 3 , t �,-.-� --�.� � �I��` = = i ` � � ' -�� - i � �`� '�'�-'� -�`s�� ► , #�� °:� = �' �;-:�;� ' � � �� :� I� =�� -Li �s ;,=_-��`?�; � , � ' _c�.�. . ? c �; �r�`k' ,.a.. .�".�"`wQ'°".., .-�"°G�~�"""'"""'°� ' i � � �: � , . � �� :1�1� �� -- :. � � = - = : - - =__ - _ �. : , ; �,� ___ , � {-,�� : __ _ �, _�- �__ _: � ___ _: � �i�`,Lr , �::_ -- :: ` _ � : i:_= I.iillr =__ !_-•- - ti.„ ��.: ' ` ` � _�- I !�i!lIt1I`� =_s_ �� ' ". 4 ..... ........ = � � N � f �r\ � .tl:ill!� _ �•�'_ �' �... .... -�' - - .�" -N p �•� � \1. � �I�'II.t _'_ I� _ �.., _� •'7' _.. . ; Y r� _'-�^�.:•�{ -.� .._.�..^_ __�'�'_ _ _ �..: .. (� '; ��i � �' �t` `-- _ = j �- - - �: ~ s`. K . \ � -�J:.. ::• ' �� _ _ . :.� �J' � � ' �' � �� :: . � ...ij �..�' •_ ......; _ _ _... ..'i : �.- -_ r'� i �...: � � ' j � ��: ,.r ..=i.��' = = - .� =� .. �_ . r -__ I�'- _ � r ' � i! �1': i, "�' ' � ' - (; j...,._.. ..... _ _ � - =i . , ��j �-.�_ i_i = _: - :._.. -:;:" :�:,� _: � = � . � �:�:.� -_::_ ._._ . — - ,:._ . , _: � ��:= � / �� ''i� ^II $TREF,T lIAP-C17Y Of _ • f � ~ - {: � � • < <' :l1' , ��t�lt➢�..� ;Y �� "� ! � � ± L _.�.�;��.�.�.J..`......y,1... � � •t.._•,ti......�� ua. n . i .:�.M « � . � .. [� ...... . .� , �wy+. f ... . . .... � ._...._:......_. . =�— : r.:� �.,.� t `��:��s . ., � i + � e ' � � � ••I L �- ' 1 ..3_ • 4F 0 .. �♦ � �� _ t� � Sharec�-Fide Zon..,l I'�re Structu�e '7.Oi�FS � 1' 2 3 � 5 6 � 7 8 9 ' IO 1 $1.OU $1.25 $1.75 $2.25 $1,75 $"1.25 $2.75 $2.25 $2.75. $2.75 2 $1.25 $1.0� $3..'l5 $1.75 $1.25 $1.75 $Z.25 $1.75 $2.75 $2.25� �a 3 $1.75 $]..25 $1.0� $l.?.5. $1.75 $�.25 $1.75 $2.2� $2.25. $2.75- • g $2.25 rI.75 $1..25 $1.00 $?_.25 $1.75 $1.25 $`1.75 $2.25 $2.75 5 $1.75 $1.25 $7_.75 $2.25 $1.OJ $1.25 $1.75 $?.25 $2.25 $1.75. 6 $2.25 $1.75 $1.25 $3.75 $1.25 $�-00 $?.25 $1.75 $1-75 $2.25 r 7 $?..75 .".>2.25 $1.75 $? .2� $1.75 $l.?.� $_l.Ct? $1.Z5 $1.25 $?.2� .� $2.25 $1.75 $2.25 $2.75 $1.25 $1.75 $1..75 51.00 $1.25 �$1.25- 9 $2.75 $2.75 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $1.75. $�.25 $1.25 $1..00 $1.75 ��.p $2.75 $2.25 $2.75 $2.75 $1.75 $2.25 $2.25 $1.25• $1.75 $1.00 . _ . � � . . . . -4- ' .■ � • r . p ♦' � �1 c. 2�iarkei:i.n • . • 'xo ensure i:hG "�uccess" of thi.s �ystem, it a;ill be . � rrecc�sary to un��ert�ke � suhstat��ia)_ m�rkcti.ng campaign. , 12esider.ts ef Fric3le,� �•riil hUve t� be r�acle a�r�are of the . � existeiiee of tt�e shared-ric,e system �I?f.1 ecl�icat�d as i:o ita . • usefulness as a rr,�ans of transnort-ation; � the tar.ic�b i� not � o��rn tl�ought oL as a mode of nublic tranCportation by the . c�enera? Population. Thus, there must be hcavy advertising, . esner_�.all� caurS.r,g tne fir:;i. .��r oF se4�T1C� (s�e �h�� nert . aac�e for 4n exarT�le L-ron ,��te�t�or t, Cc�nnecticut' s mar:;eting program) . rfarketing costs ��il� be si�3nificantly re�3uced � afi:er_ th� �irst y�ar., cr.ce :-�asic qraphics anc3 can�m�unications � .in�trumer,t� have .be�n, c�es�gn�d. , _ , � . . •: , •. . � . . .�. . . . '� � i , � � ' . \ � --5- ' � - '%`:�';i�'t;;; `�. �'. :. :�tir��.�� :�5:� ,j,� ��'�'r . ��J� t `. �' � . • . .. . • .. ��' .�� . • • • ' � . . . � . ' . . . • .' �'-� Sample of Cortrprehensive Mlrketin� �� OI �� i N nYn.'„s`!"!!u �ia�2i1H2l�A%L�1 f s:� } � ` i '' � i:' — f� `34 � j� . � � � �' . ` �, � �• ��, `�'• _ �� 1 `cG�„ � ryy..� F r?� t ? e`} �� . I ': ��'�i'�+� • , . ' . 4.1 � v:;��y ; t ,: ,,,4. > � f'� , ' �.: 1� �d`-� �� •� . l � .F,.,y y : � �r ✓- �I . _. �y�..,� �'�. ' ! .<-ir,��. . . . i�� l� �� . . �I::�M1t R�� . �-�1)� . . . . " T^+�� ? ' � : • . � ' . .. y�, }� , � .;.; . � 3 � -"t.y . �'�' ' �'1�� ^ �i ^i � �y � y l�C :.� i �: -� �T�' . ' � �4` �� `` � 14...- '/"z� . t� `. , j d • �t r�j \ `T ^•i �' i k "�• f � w w"' 4 y. ;'� �e /e �� ..,c+ t - _ t� F'k�' • ~ wfP. Y` �' f ��'3,"�..t Y .'. f ' •{/. • u Y. �Y.r� _ , . . r ,ry � .-'"� t !: Y ., , .?h '� S� , -. t� . �tit t. `.� i� � ��yy Jyt7? r_ 'y 3� � � 45 �X Y .• � rt . ''�.2;'Y+ ..:, � L_ � ! � 4�-�+.�y�a�yy �.: . . . ti.�.:%ti� rarr+v f-� J� c��{ -` ��ir s.ti� iY�� ^ �� yy �� ' ~ . . . Sh �.��`f� • � , .. {y_„+�� ' -. . � i is1 . �� • `U'� - . �� .��, �� -s�� . � � �� :��, �� :�� First came minnybus ... then Two maxytaxys.wit� De The ma�ytazywilldeliYeipackagsa. snax�bus .. . and nox mazytazy, V' specificaity e4u�pped 4Vhetner you come to town on tAe T�em�nnyr�as0onswondro�xtt�mgs tOgiv7handicapped ��innyormaxyt3zytodoyourshep- . tor �Yestpo�i Iowntoik...and soon our " ridars and tneir �pm- ping —or call your orOZr to th� slore .. � new maxytaxy will go to �vork ny-�t �� panions a salc. cam- — you can arra�ga to have maxytaxy aiongs�de minnyDus an� maxyeus, lortaDie trip. defiver your packages �ome. tocai providmg evsn more ways to vavet Slaris April 25. merchants. D�is�ne;sand protessionai mO�e umes ot day. Elevan bcight red. , people, or anyona moving smatl . • Deau��lul vans, eatn saatinq �2 pas- 7ise maxytaxq and minnybus will 9oods, intorma!ionot packagas wiil aen�ers, will g�ve you comlortabla. «�ry more Commulars. be abt� to count on ma,cytaay to eanng d�ai-a-rioe se�vica at economi- wl cost. w�th na tipF��9-.. a newand �ti�'tn tha aoo�bonci ine maaytaxy, and da4ver dodr-to-doo�. . cliSCerent kindo� ssrvicr. workinq in cooperat�on wrth mmny, Starts June 6. wa'lI soon Da methng more mornmg Ths beauty ot it a1{ is ... �nat 1�e Tha maxyfaxy wi111ake you tloot ��a�n� aun� S�ugaiuck Sra��on... �naxy��My w�il Dn a bi9 nerp �o �he to doof. eno we'll extona some o1 ovr preeani minn routs� late-even�n commutera �o Y�Y�tem as wa conlinua topio- AN you'll d0 is tlidl Y2S95�5 and 9 nnar new way� io Aarp you aad your .• _ - maxytaay w�t� �om� YJestpo� t rnll be abte to ��C9 m�aytaA_y 13mitydo your tvc�I trip� and erranda to p�ck you up an3 to� halhlarc wrth a mmny pass. {ao•n B]s��y, e1�iu�nl�y , nd ^.o�omi• S�.� ta<a you wn>ra yeu Slarls Siay 9. � ea{ty than you cJn �n your own tar. n��! wanllogoona Wepiant0t�yothetinnovalionsloo,.. 2„,p�.(�� sna�ed-nae, mal- 7re ma:ylaxy and miqnybus �iil �ndudinq tne a�rangemQnt ot car and '� 1 a•rio� �as�s. Com• o1f ar iate attornoon and weakend van pools io loc�i olhcos. 6eWre IonQ pletUqatd��sinUud• Cvoningirips. waflinkyou'ti�feNdrtopivaupona in� laro intormalion LYa w�il adC regutar rou�a runs to of your dolla�•g000lrng, gas quzttars � witi Ce announcod m twowaek�. 1 P.M.1rom Jesup Grean sc tAa1 Ihoya and let u� t�ke you wAere you want to qo! Starts Aptlt iS. , who work aowntown o+ ga to ina °Y" Cali our intotma!ion tar.le►: 22�7171 or ahop late can got a hda �ome. �O� furthe: eetaits or tp asR an u it►e maxyfucy :�i41 help our a{da�4y ti�arcRants and thc�r en�p�oy2>s w�il �;ons. Wes wanl to hel y n es• and handicao?�rd neiqhDurs !o G� �Ole to reserv� r�d±s on � i?,�uta� Pyou a1i wa ca�. �el . ru�n.l :awn. . Disis. �7s'il �ic� �nlroci:,ce Fr��y �n� �n'� .ve pl�n to-r•� yu��r t�>tai trans• SaiurCJ�r�caingm�t�tuystra�CJ• C�rl�ti,�niniOrm,�l.uneent�r—�+;��• 'i na (�anay ha� �Ire3�ty be:n a big riJa so�v�ce at na�blar� 1or pae,�old• ��9 You ern C��I u� t�r schaJulea and hclploo�ro�drrluwnspeopla.Nuw, ��s=tota6eyouroC�nne�.topar�les, ��'=sonlrains,intar•cityDusae, w��h tho aeta�tion ol ,naro�•ride, I�mou;ines. p�iva�c �ide laxis or d�al-a•ridn m�aytaxy at xprc�al rales �o the mo��es, to spec�at evan:s. �ental ean. InF the eluarly anA band�capped. Starla week o! May 16. wa'110e add�ny moro �arvice3. � C�� . , , ��1+3'� . !�� , � �I� ;`=� :.�'� ;�r��;� i. `�t ' . r ,, '` 7 . �I�,..�, �� C . ""yY�Yt: • .c '.+;�:: �,, Westpo�l ir.�nf�t �lelncl � i... ,.,'ti:. �,,,�,�;_} (f _{ `-.�._...... � �11 I'a.l fiva�l k.ut. \Ye+IDOrI. Cl. : ......��.__...�. '� -- - - d t^—".J :7"�'�� Farinlorm�llonein�l7•1�J) 4�.�y� � � � � , . . . . ' . • • , i+ ,I . . . ,: . Rr-_J.�a"t�.i.v� �c�vrint�� oL• Al.t�r.��L-a.vn_:;ysi:cm� . � rlcic�rly �r.cl II�nc.lica��ec� _ni�z].-a--l?ic�Q . . - �,low fare � . � _• - simple f�re structu�'e . Sharec'.—Ric'.e T�xi. � � .. ` . � , • -- servic� avai.labl.e ta evervone � � . � - hzcth �eve�. of_ s�rvir.e " l;ote:. Ei�her a.].ternatzve could have a significan.t iinanciai ' impact (ezti�er n�siL-ive or negative) on the ex.isting ' ccrti£aci. tr� carr ier. (s) , c�epenc?znc� on �ahether or nct • that carriez .i� selected t� operate tl:e proposec? system. . . ( . . � . �. , , � , . . . � . , • � � � �. . ti. , . � • • • . , . ,. �., . • • . . � , ' fE (�• " Costs and Revcnues A. El�erly & iIZncic:ll?;�ecl � � � Dia.l-a-Ric?e (2 vehicl�s, & 1 spare} • . . vehicle--l�c.,urs of sexvice: 1.G hrs/clay ��, . � . 36 hrs/�-reek : . .. • 5000 l�xs/yr. • . . • . 'rabte A-1 . � . • Operatinc� Cos� (pri.vate operation) - � contract �•,ith private o�erator " $�0/veh.-hr. . . administrati.on, �uditing, , � , .marketing, lec�al costs $�/� �h.-hr. total �$12/veh.-hr. . annual total � $60,000 : • . Tai�l.e P.-2 . . . . . Ga�ital Cost . � , . 3 12-�asse;�ger vans ' _� S50r000 � � � 3 farehc�Yes . . 2;?_OQ � . � : 2 rada.os � � 2,8C�0 • � ` base station � � 5,000 ' ` �_ _ total _ $50,000 � - . Tabl.e A-3 . . . . ,. � . Tota1 S�stem �Cost: • . C ��st �: ear' ' . 2n� vear* 3rd vear� � � . $�.20, 000 ,�G6, 0'tJ0 . $?2, 600 . � . , . ; ; , � . • .. . � i .. F . . . *assu�ies ].Ov annual intlation ruLe � � , � -g- • •, , . . � 4�. f . � � . . .. . � Tab7.� A-� _ � . • . � Ric3ershin ancl Re��nue � €are � 25C . 50� . . . • rlaa.ly c�emt7nc? 50-120 50--110 . annuaJ_ c]�,:i�nd 1$, 600--37, 200 �.5, 500-3a,100 . - proc?ttctivi�:l 3.8-7.5 ,3.3_-6.9 . (passenger/veh--iZr.3 . • • � � . . . r.evenue/veh.=hr. $0.95-$1.88 $]..55--$3.�15 � � annua�I. revcnue $4,700-$9,300 $7,g00-$7.7,050 � . . . . . �. . . . . . . . . Tahle •�-� � . . . Net System Cost ' :' - .• . � �.st vr . � 2nc? vr . 3rci �r • � � � :'�5� $110,740-$115,340 $56,?DO-$E1,300' $G3,300-�o7,9�J0 ' •�are , � � - . �50� $102,95G-$i12,2�J0 $4f3,350-$SS,2Oa $55,550-$64,80Q .._ . � � � . � • � ' _9- . � • - ' . • . - - • � • . • . 't � , ' �: � - . . T��a.� �--6 .� . r�et cost to C'i.tv of Fric1].ey . . � l�t yr. (lOn) 2nc� �r. (33�} . � 3rd �� (33�) � � ?5� $11�,07p-$11,53U $18,700-$20,200� $20,900-$22,400 .. fare � 50G $10,295-$11,22fl $].6,150-$19,200 $7�.8,300-$21,40D I . . . . _ ,I . . . � . . . . . . � • . �, . _ . . . _ � : •, , . .. . . . � � � Table A--7 � . � - � � Per.fcrmance Characterisi:ics . � iare � . 25� 50�• . , . op�ratir.g cost/veh.-hr. �$1? $?2 . � .aperating cost/passenger �$l.Gl_-$3.23 $1.76-$3.87 ' � . . apEr�ting rutio � � _ � (rev�nue/op�rati.n� cost) 0.08-0.16 0.13-.2a . _ tot�l o�eratinc� uef icit - � • _ per capita � $1.58-$1.73 _ �I.34-$1.63 � lacal share eperat�r.c3 �� • : . �ef ici t �er ca�i ta , (? �t yr . j $G . ].G-$0 . �.7 � �4 .13-$0 . I6 . � . , ' , . • , � . . �lOr . . __- __ . 4�� `; , . , �II. Silarec;-Ri.cae T4 r.i ' • • . . ' TabJ.e �-] . _ � . • . . S �� Cten Charc.cter is�ics : • h�iar� c� s�rv? ce : �8 hour. s/day - -1?C hcurs/��:E�!; .. 65.52 hcurs/year . . ; . . r�aily �emanc� 150-45Q � . . � ' ' annual c?err,ancl 5��, OQO-1G2 � 000 ,� . � :preciuCta.vi ty -4-6 _ .. • . (passenc�ers/veh-hr. � , � . . : veLicles neeced 2-� (total} _ . � l-4 (at any one . . . time, ciepencTing � . . � on demanc�} . . � . vehicle nours/c�ay 35-77. . � . _ annual vetiicle hours 1?_,�60-25,�'20 . . .. _ - . .- , , . • : . � � _11- . ' , • . . • ... . . . . _. . . . . _ .. .. ..._.............�....._..._.......,.�..�..........................._.�.�.......:....--•.........,,,.«..._..................,..-.,......,............................... �..._.,.. .,.�._...........•.«»....»w,«.,--h.... r�un . . ' . ' . '. ' ' � Q • ' . � .� . . . , . . , . . TahJ_e B-2 � � � O er�iti.ng Cost . � contrar.t k�itn ��rivate operator � $10/veli.-hr. � � � � � . a6ministr.ation, auclzting, l�gal cc,sts $0.75/ver.-�r... . total � . $10.75/veh.-hr. . ann��l tot�1 ; � ' $1.39,3?.(i-$278,6�0 . �marl:etinq (lst yr. ) $ 20,000* • . , *inarketing = $G000 in 2nc' �Znd 3rc; years � . � Tab].e �-3 . _ � . . _ . Ca�i �al Cost ' . �. _ . . . � . . � � sec'.an-type veh�cles $24,000 . . . . _ � � radi.as $ 5�G00 ', _ 1 base station � $ 5,000 � � fiotal • � $3�,600 ' ._ . . .. . . . �� 4 . . � . . . . . . .. " . . . . . . , ; . � � . Tab:lc �-�z . � • � Systcm Cast _ l.st yr . 2nc� vr�. * � 3rc1 yr .* $194,000-$333,200 $159,900-$313,000 $3.75,90�-$��h,300 � � . *assurnes 10� annual inflation rate . � � � �, � . . .. . -12- , , _ _ _ _ -_ _ . • '' - � . � �. � . � . y p . � � . � - , . . � . . . . . .�� . • TubJ.e F��5 � � . . � Revenue . . • . ' ' � � operating co5t/passengcr $1.85-$3.00 . �are � . � $1.00-$2.75 � . aver.uge revenue/pa��enger . $2.00. ' .� • rev�r.ue%v?i�.-hr. $8-12 , . revenue/aay ' .. . $3p0--$500 :annual revenue .. ��$108,000-$32=1,000 . ma�.le B-h - � . . . Net Skste.�, Cost : , . . . . .. lst yr . * . 2.nc: vr . � � � 3ru yr • . ' - - . net.cost $g0,000-$113,OOa $0-$51,800 $24.000-$07�900 . :net cost $1?�,340-$121,000 Si3,000-$5�,900 $44,300--�75,�00 -with sub- ' . . : � sidy to � . . : ' -- . � elc3erly . _ . . • and hand i- _ � . � � � . . . . capped** • : . - . �_ • . . . . � *a�st�:�e:� realizati.on o� only 75 � of nroj�ct�d revenue � . ' . �uring Ist yr; uer�and is expec�.ed. to reGch a.ts peak by ?nd � � .• yr. anc� remain fairlj steaciy therPaiter. , **assumec 2Q� �L riaership to be e�:h, o.r 30-90 . � . , �t�S�'C'l1CJ£.'Lc��C1ilV� i �. SU�S1Ci� U� %�J1'�- I �l: il(iL'� �Otcli :iL:�S1C�� . = $a,0O0-$?.�_'•,300. . . ._ • • . . ' , . . . . , � ^13-, ' . ' , . • . , . . • 1 . ' , . - , . . 4Q . . . ,: .� . .� � . y. . . . . _, . � : � . Tat�? e B-7 • . _ ..' t3et Cos� to City of I'r ic?7.F�y (vrith e&h sur�siciy) .� -- • 1st vr. (l00) 2nc� yr. (330) 3rc' yr.. (33�) �� _ -$�1,�30-$}_Z,1QG ��,3d0-$20,000 $1.,70Q-$25,000 �. . : � �. . Table B-a _ � . . - Perfcrmance Char�cteri�fi.ics - � , ' � : averaqe fare . - � . `$2.00 � . ' � operatir.g cost/veh.-hr. � � � $11-$12 � . -- : • . ogeratin� cost/passenger $1.85-$3.00 � operating ratio (revet�ue/oo.cost) 0.73-1 � � ' � � . total operating deficit $0-$1.�0 �. . � per capita . . . � ��: � local �hare eperatir.q . $U-$0.19 .•. . - c�ef icit per capita (�.st yr .} . • • . . . � . . . _ . : . � : . _ • . • . . .� • •, , . . . . ..�,q_ � . , .. • . . � , . � , 4R . . . � ' . ��tmmar.�: C�st to CiLy ot Fric�leY ., . . . lst yr. (�Oy) ?.nd yr. (339a) �3rd yr. (330) E1d�rly and Hur.di- - . , � � . � capned Dial-a- � � � _ . � .. P.i.d� (fare=25G) $11,000-$11,500 $1�,7�C-$24,200 $24,900-$22,�00 ,Sl�arec�-�:ice Aa;:i $1i,�30-�-y�2,100 $ 4,300--$20,COQ �14,700-;'Z5,000 _ �.. . . • . « . . . . . . ,. � . � . . . . . � . `�5r ' • , � . ....... . . . . . . .. ..w�,. ..,.r,_.�..�,_._ :,_,.....�. . . . . . . . ,_..�.... ,�, --•__,_..,. .............�._..._........_...__�.�:..,.._._,y.....,......_._:�......�....�.�.....,�.._�_._.._�_......„v,.._�...........___.. _.._..,_,,,,�,.... r. r_j�. r. �r.� � ••� • ' "� • (, . L :'.� A 1 � - I : . ..�..� �,.� �. . j • � j ... .j .. �.i' R •. '��f'�'t��..r �f��,r� •��i.l,t' •��t: �l �/:�i tI!`��w+�,��'S �: j7..��'�, t�. � ,�� .,': ,,�;.. : i „ , .i,,.�. �;�4r-.•y . ��........,.�. . ,�(•, ....�.«....►........�.. - - -�-• -::ai......::..;::�.►d.11��yy -�:.,� �,:�:.+w�.-_. - -:Sir�..dw +...+►... �...r-t---•-=---°---� . � �_ j� � � n. . th i.si:n•1 .. 6 1'rri'.. .•.� . `� .. . .. •.p •�.�r� !. �. JA q.j � � � �,' ` . ' PNGl�4(.!{I 1.0i)E Yi�IYIOUiLY 11(MOiif[D' . . . . � � nrf: (_Ih0 , .,.�. ��.;,a � t�!.•4�-cN �U.G'u•:•^$5/rn:rdt• � 1'(rUt:Y :..:1+ ' MI)f,tLlAhlVUy U6GfUAA{WH 11A!b1oC�IMn�4,��r. � i Ct•1 85564 111 /77 ta 12/ 31 JT7 �4 '._',""'. .. . � . .. • �a;.. . .:.. ..� w�c��. I J UH �(N.IL\ StLUrt11 Y r.0 c, � City of Fridley • i�J ,.• j:t• i�iS:Uf:.:: 1'r.��\E oG`�:!�E.� PN0:1E ' ;� 6431 University Aveniie Ptortheast, Fridley,�Mn. 55433 571-3450, Ext. ?31 : 6~....._ ��:,:,i.�PU u� :�.�. :.::ew� :.�•_r. , . � Same as above, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. 7��. . � � �..: �,�;..:._:� .-, _c,,s a�.:.i_.::.:.i-.,�..�: :...�.�:•.i ;.^, r,-�:.�.,•.: ,•.. 2/15/1978 P►rI1516 ldindemere Drive. N.E., Fridley, Mn. 55432 f,. `(�L�:S�rf �vf� Jr ACL�UE�.1 Lfc IOSD IUsr reve�st. d neC�:starYr. � Electrical damage to appliances at 1516 4tindemere Drive N.E. casued �, 0 � the iha:ving of water pipes ai 1510 Berne Road, Fridley, F�1n. 55432 Y IV:UHY ' FnUP'CF,T! OA:AAG� .• SINGIE U651 Ji�/lOaS v'%.YCt Otno�r.so�no�cac!r orMtH co«r+a�cs r•a.�au�:. io«�n�.�rn.r ;s. ( . :2` ' .. YE�4. ��4Y.f F.•OOGI 'I.I.N. fVdh��1i1C4nt.IK'LO^l:o� �I �-:. . �.' ' . a! ,jz :�_::;, ,;, v:.r:�R ;CneckJe.��r?asooF�rYhviceri A�D��55 ��;�AV'Sa�aedSDOi�(�ny,d%:/ -S:.Y.E• . . SRlJE•• :,: �I� '�•c:'c O% ORriE�t tCr.ecw�rs:..-n�asc.r�e•i • :.t,t •r.L'�FESS :G".etw�r;.jr�raso.,na•� •a:,rtE� : . • .Sa:nE. :] - .� • :=14]��L%.�•�': '+Q tNSUn^EO (Empwyee.Fam��y.etc.; OATE UF E;IkTM UkivEny LI�Et.�E r.�:.:�ER JLc� �i5' u,�{_a.;,; UAI.taGE �E�'niN Esfi!.ta[t �'�HER: G�h GtiR ::r16 �'r•r.ca :.uuH�ss ; R. C. McCu] 1 och 1516 t�li ndemere �Dri ve �`17 Vi.��n 4.:�viR �Cr..�ti�ty,��ioNnen Q � •$4MC• • . . y.�_is��Ea:.=.�bz ��:OpEkSY (Nau.o.►.U6a.Yrar.V�airKOJ � 4! c. Qt9 GiYC �:: £ c uaaGE � . � ' �iec�tric�Z Appliances ; n�(j.i ♦.t :tc u��:'uua,u: �c;u�r� u�;>a°.rra� :.(:��•t�5 ►"Z1 v'�'.'.•.:i��:: ' ft.f'�UtEO HY '" �. f . hlcCul 1 och � =�22• • �� •�:��e u:s:.«�u�. i:c�u�;,�n rv 1til1f:N ,•.��r a,� ��r.n.,��ES• �v 1 J f ) �t!!�< ��I� nN0 b72.i� '•••. �:•�. �u.�.•.r!... ..yw.•.�.. . �•r.:wsa Al�14:1 �? L�� i.: R! :r:A\ � See attached material. _jYES �_�,:., tt�=t�i ts�c.,;. �507.31 :US'rAVY 01( :.GEK�,Y �•.HEAE C�'� C�R GE : t,�cir;� v �:+yu�+r CULUj10N OcO. ' :t Lub�biy. c[C . , PLASf KO. �•• YES� !:G` I 1lCiAG P��f. . USED Y:tlH FEF:.��3�'.' YES ❑ N�� 571-4064 AGE ��`��EO O�NiR FE^ �E�r.CIE �E►+�C'LE � � ' � � .� tillAl{V?1 1U IY�U:+t,t1 ICm��o.l� i.vnu�.re: � I:ISI1tFE� Of��fR L��r��• vi `rk;lE vE►��: t� ..��6?.1/78 Marvin C. Qrtmsell ' Marvin C. arunsell � __ �.aii °—'j�r;i'nn U� u��i��:ltt� lu u�.��.UUUI d��r.tl�lnlu Mr�Uwl1►PU t��:��• MEMO T0: Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager- MEMO FROM: Richard N. Sobiech, Public Works Directo DATE: September 7, 1978 SUBJECT: Reapproval of Munn's Hillcrest Addition Please be advised that Mr. Tim Munn has requested time before the City Gouncil at the meeting of September 11, 197$ to discuss reapproval�of Munn's Hillcrest Addition. The reason for tha request is noted in the attached correspondence from Burtington Northern which indicates their disapproval of the City's request to re- construct the existing railroad ditch, which was proposed to.be used in development of the plat. Together with the correspondence from Burlington Northern, please nate the letter from the City Attorney to the attorney for Buriington Northern requesting review of the initial City request. � - It is still hoped that t�e railroad would come to some agreement regarding the use of tne drainage ditch. In any case, it is recommended that the plat approval remain as it is unt+l final resolution of �11 possibilit+es with Burlington Northern. Burling- ton Northern, as noted in their correspondence, did indicate an alternative would be to construct a pipe within their right-of-way. If, in fact, the developers would agree to pay the cost for the pipe construction the development could proceed in that manner. RNS/jm 0 m 0 �� 1�� .; � y` �� ` � ' s�� .� : .�• m 6� C�i°Y O� ��C�L..EI( 8431 11NIVERSITY AVEAlUE N.E.� FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE ( 612j5T1-3450 July 18, 1978 CiTY i:OiJ„CTi_ 1�t;TTCt;? i,i!;i:�t I�i01"IC�: Timothy Munn and Todd Blair P.O. Sox 22503 Robbinsdale, Minnesota 55422 RE: ZOA #78-05, Munn's Nillcrest Dear Mr. Munn and Mr. 61air, Addition f;:,; Jul _17,._1978_ i.:l;e rt� id'! ^y � i;,y �� urci S y -- - — -�--- ---- (. : a ' \/ �`�tJw.r��jt�ti �rrii.�i�� : �;i_!!.�� i�� .,.�?�. '�!' �'t �� . ,-, ., - � , appr.4Ya1 of_ fin�l__.PI-a�------- I'Ii L.i� r�i.a. S�iti�l_tl��l�.�l::i�`_, � i��'..i:C: '!,^- i'._'.�'j. {�iCi $�' . '�.'�:'.%: '%:'�t� i��.3:;:C� _ i,.�t�l�' i�,.�U�i. � S1L��:: �EiE' �i�'lt�:�(11c1'�#� i:'�:ii`s:'s � t't`�t1 1"Oi:iil'r� C��ic :.i`;?� ` 1',f) :,��c :;i ��' v1� �'i'iUit;}. � ,. , �''i �'{%t,' �l'c.1': ?'t't;i ��i.`i'.�i:1C�i't�. i'tl:d3'J�1'y :.f�f'..�.ii`:�i�ti: �tiC+�?0>li j?i£';uS� C:.l�+i i.1:F L��:i�Z,��L�j� ��:'e�17��i:'.'.1iL Vlf�y�t� ..L �!{�...)�c��ll, . Jt.ti;' t�G Si: i r►tt 1�:. � i a�» s. . _.. a_____..4__ See 8 stipulations attached. � J� �C.iL�ij. •1.��\':'�i..0 l_....i_��,�`_ +y.��l��i ' '_.._'._..� l �+ �� '��i�^r; l� .� � � i !-i � 11 . l. l. �r �'�..t — /d "�, i � � �S �; r �'� il t:1nCi1. ��.}� `.[/y(f ( �� _ � ' a �1 7/�O//� Muns�'s Hilicrest Addition approved at Council meeting of 7117/78 with the following stipulations: . 1) That the drainage plan functions to ensure that property owners south of the plat are not impacted by the development; and if possible, work with them to reduce their existing problems. 2) 20 foot access eaement to Lots 11, 12 � 13 be constructed with appropriate hard surface area to adequately handle maintenance equipment and to be placed prior to the occupancy of the proposed_ dwellings. 3) A performance bond to ensure the proper site gradings for each lot be obtained. 4) There must be agreement from Burlington Northern to reconstruct the datch Co � ensure positive drainage outlet. 5) That all costs for the drainage system would be borne by the developer. 6) Park fee of $300 plus dedication of Lot 10 for park purposes. 7} Petitioner to inform poteRtial f�uyers of lots that lots to the east a�e a drainage area, not a park. 8) Approval of plat by Rice Creek Watershed District JM � �: �� , r ,�a. BURUN�Gi'ON NOF�fHERN 80 �+th Avenue Noxtheast Minneapolis, Minnesota 55�+2�- Mr. Richard N. Sobiech, P. Public Works Director City of Fri.dley 6�+31 University Avenue, N. Fridley, Minnesota 55�32 Aeax Mr. Sobiech: E. E. �� .�l �, � . q,� August 28, 1978 Referen�e to yaur lettex dated August 3� 1978, and our recent phone comrersation regarding your request to ccnnect 'co our drainage ditch near Hickory Drive, in Fridley, Minnesota. ` 6C As a.�ivised in our phone conversation, we cannot ap�rove your applicati�n due to �he numerous problems that could b2 encountered in such a.n asrangement. Huwever� I did mention that xather than connect to our drainage di�tch, you should subm�t an application to run your 12 inch CMP along the outer edge of our right-Qf-way line +o Locke Lake. For your convenience, am attaching Application for P�.pe Zi:�e Permit which should be permitted in �riplicate, in accordance with the gen�ral rec�ui.re�ents on �he reverse side �,nd retuxn to this office al.ong with sketch indicatin�; the exact location o� tiiz proposed pipe line. Yours -�ruly, B�'RI,Il�TON NORTHERN INC . ,�`.��G E. Z. Phillips G� ��Z� Superintendent � �� '' ��.�'�' MN�mec A�tachment CC: Mr. G. J. Pechma.nn File: �`ridley - 3� GHAp�ES R. WEAVER HERMqN I.TA�LE VIR61L C. HERRIGK AOBERT MUNNS WILLIAM K. GOOOR�CH DOU6LAS E. KLINT Mr. Gordon Forbes Attorney at Law 480 Cedar Saint Paul, Minnesota lAW OF�ICE$ WEAVER, TALLE & 4-iERR1CK August 31, 1978 Re: CiCy of Fridley---Burlington Northern Railroad Dear Mr. Forbes: 316 EAST MAIN STREET ANOKA�MINNESOTA 55303 421-6413 5270 UNIVEA5ITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 671-3E30 Ttiis letter is a follow-up to our recent telephone conversation in which I advised you thaC the City of Fridley wa� attempting to secure approval of the Burlington Northern Railroad f�r use of an open ditch on the railroad right-of-way to provide surface water drainage for a proposed residential area. Tn order to provide you with more detailed information, I am encl�sing a photostated copy of an Application For Lease Of Site; a map of the City of Fridley indicating the location of the drainage ditich; a Ietter from Mr. Richard N. Sobiech to Mr. E. L. Phillips, dated August 3, 1978; and a response from Mr. Phillips to Mr. Sobiech, dated August 28, 1978. In the initial Application, Mr. Sobiech indicated that the work within the railroad right-of-way would be performed by Burlington Northern. Iiowever, after further discussion with Mr. Sobiech, he has indicated that the City of Fridley or the residential developer would be responsible for the cost of said work and that it would be agr�eeat�le either to have the railroad company do the work and be reimbursed or to authorize a private contractor to do the work subject to the approval of �the plans by the City and the railroad. In addition, the City of Fridley would agree to maintain the ditch and hold the railroad free of any liability. It seems to me that this is certainly a fair and reasonable proposal. I request that you review it with the appropriate railroad people and contact me as soon as you have some info�ation. Best personal regards. VCA:J3H cc: Mr. Richard N. Sobiech, P.E. Enc]:osures Sincer;ely, ; �! ,-��'. r1�, C ��:- Virgil C. Herrick � � ,. � � �'� '.,.- ",� �...._.�...��/if � .�...�,.._, �/'��/ � �` V . a �Q��`� �� ..�� 6431 UNiVERSIYY AVEHUE N.E., FRIDLEY� MtNNESOTA 66432 ' , iELEPNONE � 812)571-3450 September 1, 1978 Mr. 7imothy Munn P'. o. Box 22503 � Robbinsdale, MN 55422 Re: Non-issuance of Bui.lding Permits for Lots 5 through 9, 61ock 2, Hillcrest Addition Dear Tim, 0 � As yvu are aware, the City of Fridley currentty has a hold on the building permits for the referenced lots. The City at th,is time will not issue building permits on these lots p�nding the outcome of the recently approved Munn's Hillcrest Addition plat. ---- _._.. It is the desire of the City to proceed with the plat which includes rhe Fiilicrest Av�nue service drive. We feel it 'ss in the best interests o� the C'sty �o avbi�! i7stalling a�ditional acces� dir� ectly onto East River Road. �. Until we come to the canclusion that it is not feasible to proceed with the plat, we are not in a position to issue individual building pzrmits on the referenced lots. Yours very truly, Richard N. Sabiech, P.E. Publ ic 4lorks Di rector �H $r� [A � « 0 uE CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDUM T0: NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR./FIN. DIR. SUBJEC7: ENGAGING AUDITOR FOR THE YEAR 1978 �ND CONSIDERATION OF NEW FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS DATE: SEPTEMBER 6, 1978 Chapter 471 of Minnesota Statutes will require that the City'�s year-end reports be audited and published no less than 180 days after close of the fiscal year. This new requiremeni will go irito effect for the year 1979. The 1979 report would normally be prepared sometime during the early part of 1980. It is my suggestio�� that th� City put these same requirements into effect for the year 1978. This would require that the auditors complete their work no later than htay 31, 1979. This would leave ihir�y days to have the report typed, printed and reviewed, etc. In a separate matter, the same law provides for certain standards of reporting and places responsibility for the preparation of the fir�ancial reports. The way I read the Statutes, some sections of our Charter may not conform to the language in the new Statute, Perhaps this section of the law should be sent,to the Charter Co�r�mission for their review. MCB:sh Attachment m J � � GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY CtrtiJitd Pablic itccoun[ants 17E SOUTH PLA2A BUILDING WAYZATA BOULEVARD AT HIGHWAY 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 56418 aae-2sea August 30, 1978 The City Council City of Fridley Fridley, Minnesota 55421 Dear Councilmembers: We are currently planning our fa11 and winter work program and would appreciate an indication that cae may be invited to conduct the 1978 audit ot the City as we have in past years. 7A We would perform an audit of the balance sheets of the various funds of the City as of December 31, 197� and the related financiai stat�ements for the�year then ended. The audit would be performed in accardance with the procedures established by the State Auditor and the American Institute of Certif ied Public Accountants. These procedures are compatible with the pronouncements of the National Council � on Goveriimental Accounting. The audit which we �aill perform will be an examir.ation which cor_sists of a review of internal cantrol, accounting procedures, an� the details of all records, in- cludi.ng subsidiary records and supporting data as to mathema�ical accuracy, pY'apz'i:�ty and completeness of all transactions on, a test basis. The test examiiia- tion presumes that the items selected are representative of all the transactions. Although such an audit a.s the one most frequen�tly used today, it will not n�eces- sarily discover fraud or defa3�cation. However, should fraud or defalcation exist, it may be uncovered as the result of one or more of the procedures applie3 an a test basis. As in previous years, we plan tc► do as much work before the ye�r end as possible so that we may present our reporC at an early date. We have enjoyed our relatianship with the �ity during the past years and hope that we may be allowed tn conduct the 1978 audit. JGM:gmd Accepted by the City of.Fridley ay, Very truly yours, � � J. Gregory Murphy Title Date RO$ERT W. MATTSON $TATS AL1PI70R August 25, 1978 STA�E OF MII�TNESOTA � 4FFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR Se�,vr PAUL 55155 Ci::;� C1er'r.s ar.d Finance Off.icers : � 296-2551 Durinq the ? 97^a L: gislative :'�e�siori an Ar.t. ��.=as ras��d wh�r_.n .4��:a.b�.�_sl:ed ycquzr��r,��nts for fi:l �^r.•? a:: sta�_e�:�e�zts j: cz�or'�s and . ai�c�i�{�s. This Act a]�so pra�°ides rJl" � ua � forir: i i�cal ye�.r_ ior_� • c"i�.'�: Cl.t.1G�S .l.l? i'•Ilfl2'1E'.S!:3t�7.. 'L'iiC: pw"li..�l'V i�:,r��zct of :�1zn;iesota :�''t:c?�'.t1�I:E'.� _. i�:7t3, �h�_L��er '787 ; wi). � a� cs^ ti��.•�C C:1?�:��'� i:�i � h r c�pu:e.�tior:s 2, 5'�u i.tIl.'7t. !>VE'y ar:G. ts".:lijSc^ C:��: lc?S "rilclj' i?�,�lt' Gt:.l-i.:�?'_' t-I:c'.i: R C�'c� �t::1C3cZr Vt.3:.° �°.C: '�:i)��7_i �1SC<`i�_ ��Ori.1T:t= �:?3"1.0:�., '�'!1<� t:.i`?'].CL ''J`- �•i1L'_ fi4a'�:E: �'ia�l.'f:.0y a17d ��c St�.*�c �?��n� ��g Tgc�::c�� has�e 1�I"ILiiclZ� r�SiJJri:;i'tai.lity =:�r :im�_,?;:��,�ei,t�i=:.�cn �a �?�� r��i�;i.ons �� th�.s Aci:. I�s par�. of t2?e . '.-ii:cti:f' �iUC.'! i�G'L"' S T'E'S?7C�11 �1t�12]_i..kE'S i:: 1. � �f�f:.�.er r�i.?.'. � �;'VF? �� Oit? i''! L?�- . nc,t�.c�� t.o a:t_1 citv c]er.ks ar.c� fin��n�e oYfice�rs tha� tiz�s �.en.i.�:_ �ii�2f):?. �';:=i8 bc?C.Y� ':'Tl<3�^i:F?t� <�Tlt� t:11cZ� (,i3C:�i C�f3Y�:,13_IiuI1C;E G`�f:LCe1 �:i�1Jll..i_:i 3i):a?::� c-% C�E:'.�'`..C�::l3 �.°. _:1.Ui; u5 t.O ��cf'. :1��.1.C�.1}:J_�.1�` .7f: t.aG�. �C'.C?1£i1.a� i.r.::1 'l:C� L�lf-:::.Y' �")1T'i:1.G:li.:::�. C:'�T'C:Ui'.:SI;uT'�C.E:S. . . �!.'�'zC3 :tii:lSL)Y �:',1�'J�QSE' O�: %i?� �_u�7 IS t.C� `.r'.�?'�C?jr" t--�1P Cji'ii2i.1'Cy c"�.?',(?. ls3't:L'- :C�r�.l�;t�• �f fii��a_..%,�,�:.` rc.ports �f N:innc:s�i:�� cit:.�s. T�:is 1F��i.s'�.��r•�c>,� �:FiU` i"c't:t�1.JC-`Cf :iU�":Ji'L. �3."C>iil 1.T1C.J_:�J..i�.U<j! i'i.E?Z't>S �x11�1 f1;1ctI2CP vi�:i.l.t�I:;:�, �iit'. Lii...:0i1l1�i.7tG! �iT'�.1. �c 5S�.Uf? , �iiC 1�11_211;"?SUt:ca rI�: ::�C.'..l�a� ��iIi: IZf��.^-.. i:_.��? L:f�:"..�', � c""C::.1_�:�".:I:'1?1 � ..�T:C�' .:i ti �Y,-; l �-� r.� j.' r�r t ^� �- �r•. 71�_� � J_ , .. �f1 �:., _ .iC: 1��...�� 11 �. �.LTi_ii..,�..i .1 G L7.c..J . � !. �:,..�r'� (:S �l.`7��£:Y„f'C! vti''1?�.�"1 }.:f1:�..�'i �.E,'C'.151::3i:1CJ.T1 �ii±VE? expresseci .th� f�Ct7E? �:.:?�':� 1'� cax: :��; iznI�l�mei:t��d witiz a r� ii�iMUm o� incor.�r�ni.ence and th�,r- ar��,� ^!::�r��e^ r.equired will be m�.�ne in a:��irit ef cc.�gYratio� �r::� �m�• pr`o�re<i f.i.,�.-rnci��.? repa,. tinc� . . . �)II:�].I)•:� �i1'L' �.:r�`J_�,??'i1�I?��w�1G21 �7;1c3S� t�i: �._his 1.��1.�',��.c.�� l1 � �:.}I��i"^ .3.�:� - . t:l�xna ni� �jor a.;��ti.�: �.i.i�:s �•?��:ich are . i:a'-::i�ig piac�. 'r'�.r5i., t:hc . C�f_s:ic-c� O�: t L'!.G ti�� .'.�? TiU(�� i Gi'. 15 GLl._ r^ntly COI1C�t1Ct:l.riti �7 Y'f-_�J :.E?W C�i: i]_ili?l.?C'_�i�. zurl:� repo-c:ts for_ t}i� 1977 iisc,� � �.�ear.. of eiti�s �a�th ��op�zlat7.GYIS 2,5d� aild ��t=er.. Th� p�r.poaF� af �h� r�vie�: is tU a4l.nrmin� tl,e . tyP�:s an� :;umber �f C!l1?1rJC:S t},a.: will be reciuir.cd by inc.az��.�?u=l. C.li .l.!.'�', 1;:r..a CC:itt��.y �J�.C�2 �:Y`_t�. 1.�1L•*, itl`.: Yu�l? c W fi��d�_n�s c3�@ C031•^-3.L7f:�"F.:� ac1��:i�c:>L�� i� �::�i:t:zc and arL *c�r the inio:-r.i_�ui.on �ii�cl l;c�r.efit of �, 3..:'1u.3�: �_C�.i:c11 C:.',t.1.t?:� � il� �:.Z1C�1.�.. c�UC�?.l`.OIS. �'i?e 1"L'`SUZtS Of t�1:'a iE:1,'7:G:� wilJ. .�.,e tra?�s^�il:+_��c? to �:�ti.�s p!�ior to Oct�ber a., J.978. '!'�:�� ::o�i:� d�cti;rity beinc; CCI2C1l,1Ct4ci by tY:e: nf�.ic� of thP Sr.at-.e At.oa.i:ar. i.� the clevel��nie;�i. of. a r�ew hanaLo�;c an ''.•iinz.r,tum F.epor�:.n� An Equat Opportunity Employer . *'�...• . O ,�_� City C�.erks and T'inance Officers August 25, 1978 Page 2 RequireMents, City Financial Statements for Cities with 2,500 Pop�lation or More." Theae requiremeni�s are being d�vel.oped in cooperation with other state agencies, the accounting profession and city finance officers. It is exnected th�t this handbook wil�. be available to individual cities prior to January 1, 1979. The third activi�y is in the area of training programs and is being coordinated by the State Planning Agency. A Task Force has been formed and is curr�ntly in the pr_ocess of developing training and educational materials which will be presented at regianal warksliops. These sessions are tentatively scheduled for DeccmbEr 1978 and January 1979. A1.I city clerks and finance officers will have an opportunity ±o a�tend. Preliminary orien- tation sessions will be conducted by a representative of the State Planning Agency in conjunction with the League of Minnesota Cities regional meetings this Fall. • Enclosed for your information is a copy of Mir.nesota Statutes 1978, Chapter 7�7, a nazrative description of the new law and a bi.bliography of reac3ings on gov�rnmeni�al account.ing and financial reportii�.g. As �urtizer information is dev�loped on reporting formats arid requirements you o�ill be not:ified. Fs w� move �orward with implementation ot this new law� we wc�uld appreciate recea_ving � any comments or observatians that you have with respect to its usefulness and effecti.veness, Si y, � _ � � � � ��'2'�- �;�'-� � ��..� ROB�:RT W .' MZITTSON . . State Auditor 7� ..... __._....._....�.. . . �F � � � � W �._._._. � � � y� ...�--�� t- �' c,�„•� 5 �.�' . � ,�n. � iv . + �S, �S �: � � .� 7i - a f �a. �i } �� _. w � y a g � � _ �� .. .s g'_ X,f,�a�, � .. �;aa. j,� .,y .a�,�.y f> W •i �' p� � » J v, i, ^� �. .. h U � :: � �. � > �n . /� '� '� �u 'y � � �� •�cf �`•��' i ...~ 7 � �� :f�3 �'.�' W -� ;�✓�� 7 VI U � � � �J � f � ;�a. i' 7 -i Y � �• � ?'�'+ ✓.> �' W, J .� IJ � �. j �, " .. ��; + .�s •�. S � •%S' S � "ry �c� ?: %� ^ U J .'� .^. ? �i n � M '9 � "• y a o�,�~ �'s � �� .;+�•^ �• �;caf"�' � �l�"�s��'� ?ta.;-' �., �5• �'�•_::•.,Y�'� �f�� '�� a'.. � :�r; . o�a .� x�.�,�,.�,, �� .., �� ti � , .,,��,� �� 5 g•� � ry y �-� �'�.� o+• � �` , ? � � aF� a.t; �,� n � �.�" ^ � �(' � � < �'� w p 1i' � �'- `� � � ° U� �� ,,�,� y � a. � cn ?, � f3. � � � �p �p•n 3" v� ^ � �'G `' .�i +.�m,i �.7 � r � r��,.r�q � S' �.� �' �D c�. . �, �'>. O � 7� ^ . w =� � W .� '� �i : �� m � w r.. � C'J{u• � � � �p '3 � � O m � ��7 ,� r� v ?i �. ? .�+. cyi..� r: � � � � r, : '� � fi+ � � a ' O �n r7, � �. � C�+ '�• � � 6 � � $• � '"' �' � ,'�� yfii O� "" � N• ^ Q .�. v, n � � � `� .•7. 7 O ,i G r�, .� ^� :i �!x' .a. LZ, , .D � .., ❑ � n �„' " ro c�v' £'' g g• � � e. �'� a' �, p .� ;; � "��' � � �n c' u�' g• '"�' '� cn � � � � H � � x y ... � ,, x w � 5 " � '" : °. � " � �. � c� � � "" �; ss, SC� . ,� � . ry� 5�� .- � �. '� 4 ��f � � � � pm �., � � Q '^ �•, �. .��,.' � � a -� � n �(� �.'Y � .�' � - ic w � ~ u� '~° ?` o 5 ^' ��'� � .r p E'.�.� M � +f: � �� °� i o o w � M .�~e�o $ -~r �s' •�'• �' �" Q 5' 5.t,.,, 3 � ,,, ,o M. �3 �, � n �� y c � �; v; � �? w � � �.. � m ?" ° �, ^ ''' ; `3 �- � �•'' � o � � �, o � :' '-' � �o � � � �y �. ~ ,. .r' ,� a• � [�� '� O � O � y �' w� ro � � O• �O� � W ry O ,� C'Cy � ti� y p ..D O Ci 5'.ry... �'� W n � �S � ,� .... � . .-. ci ��"' �" C � � �; v� "" (�i 'C'�' 't � So � t9 .-. c�� m � b �' � w n � fl . �' � �„ o G. � � `� Ci. �'. �.. '� . � e: G1, ry � ju" O c'�r �• to �i p, m G.. 5 G: p Fi w '< � O. O. P. � in . � � aa s�', -� �- ?, �' ». = � � � 5� -'^ '. � s =- 2- �o -,� �,o- :S. {� = �. ' � '7 �; �� .. o '� � :n � �, � � .� .�, � 3 � :a� ?��°e�'...� � � �"� � g � � a 3 � � =ti V�� aa_ye�?��' '•^ �•� x --? Pi" =% „ •x � .. '� ^ ~' � ^� =� � -7 •'� .�«� � � 5 � 5'-i � 3 � � ,�,�i .Pn ?.a a•� �'� < �o-, a � �o � a, � �,� � �.'' � � ^ Y � � � s 5 y ... � � .� � � ^. �' M N �' n =' = ^ � � �, �•`'� � -� '"' � '..-�, � ~ o � �� %'� °,�.1 � � r: � �. `�. � -� ��. �'< � � � y� �� m " n � � � W µ p .t rJ� t]' � .^i � � ^ U � � V' � �j�' C � � U a. r� O,� " � O � � � �• 7 � � ,:i' � .r ,:�. � } C j �o`• � . �- S��i v• � � � p � H m a ev p -'�' 3- �ry � � � � � � S .� 7 ^7 � � � �. G • � � � �. � w .�+. r�_+ � � � r O y � � � '•�e m O. r's � .r a � � �• • � a• $ � c � � .,' ^ � ° �, � :n m o � �g � �. 5 a ,�a, � � ]-" �. ' � � � � -o f3 5' .. �n � o � o �• m �i�,,,� 3. '`� 'Y � (�y • �� w5 ^i rf'-� M .�p �• 0% W :/l �I ~ 5v � �. n, t?. � -- k � : o � a �' �,�, � `� � R '-,; s- w � � c =� � � °. � E: d �o � .< �•� r�'rrs. �. � ro � �: � � �',E'r^ c� �; �• c'��';, � r��o � ��oR�'�.�,•� 5�� G F=mS-��,o �m �' 4,�,g$��..�$ �, � �q �f O u,' c~.1 �3� �P [D Ci C ^ eD � CI• »r ��D � A � G: .v'. ^'. i'o ^,�cs � �� .c G° � � � � �-•_:�� r3. R� a �' �� p �;�, � Ts ° � =� ° c. � �r" � c � �. �, � "" '° 5� �, „ �; 5 �' � �, w g �� .��,... ��. � � .or�...'o � � �i' w �- A � �' Ts � '.��. u, 5 � �' �fi � ° " .P w (� c W �' b., � � � p cD m •�D,� -xcs ,y o�o ,�„� � �p �, �j p' �n � � � P �; � '6 � m G' !�y t, �� +� � W �, � p,, fj . � t7, � � �T�.' p• �` � �• �'• G' �' � c9 j �" � S3� c '+ � °n �C �. � � � n Fr+ 'c7 � O �� m � � c� m m � ... }�i � � fi> � o. � � '+ s �' � c� er �o � �• � �, � � a� � ��j � �. y y' g FR ... m m � � �- o �. ��y °' N � iu �o' � r�� =° �Yry �` fD p t� � � � i.�. pS � [ryL W F � V rT � . R+ W M .�.. � n !B .�.. '�J' D. � cD G ti N �.�+. `�G A O tL .�-w ..Q.. O+ .7 N=' A ,-Yj- � � � .�i > � :i -n- � 3 � � �. �S � .�� j�'� .:s .J ? a S• 'f�' �� 'D -r 'D � � = 7 � � 3 �' � �: �-� ,.,, n � p �. y ,/; 5 �' �•e � �v � ti �: fJ c[� �• � � ;s; � �, Cf1 � � '� � :� ,7 ��''v• < 3 .� v 1, � O• � � ^ � '3• :� C. � n .'�� T � ;. S�i .� � � V n' � a h :a -.. a' � � � ?' ... � ^ ... = �2� � � m �' .. . " � - � p .� sa :n r :-' w ;� "/] ,c� ?c� _�g'j�: 3. 'f�,' ?`_w = > > � ,�'� ;�•? -, s.-, ., � �, `.-'. co'� r �'w 00 �. � 'i' ' " � -�. � � ? � �' � T ... � � �' � p � J "� �' m � � r r s' L' � �, j. `C o� � :a m' ,,, p 5' '� � � �' c _ ,,, m �. �-+ � � m ;a � M • ,,� = - � ti �t.a'� W .� r. � — ^„ ? � ;� ,,,. ,- ^, ry „ � � � � �. �y[ � .�P �= � �"• j � � r � U� O ., m" �1 -•� � � O m � j•'t � � m �'• � < ^ .+ a ^c t5 �''s m : " � � � � < m G r� �'ti, � , ` � � 5 c= �, ?� � m w ° µ � u' -.�, �- � ° `o � �' �,�� ,�,�..��•� � f ,.,a�+�;� �� •<5-0-�0 � ►�- � �,,{�' S'� �•c-.. _.� ° ? �T%o? � � a .,.m � 3 � �..� s%�.a.ry � �' Q 3 �+g�.A � �-'+ �;�•' -*�5'7.� °_',5•'� rn�'c:� �� _� ;3'� v w � L�. � m $ A �' � � o o :+ � ' � �. � � � � � �, � g �. � \o o ,A. ,t: q m �, �?' �' . � �. �i. m � °'S 3 `O ° �• ; �'�5 •e. 5 o7 G o- � �• n`; ~ � m � o � r b} O.. R � °' �+ � � m -`�i m � .7 �' s �'- `! � N �t � � �' CL �� O �S � n T S a� � � � y P� rs. � � � � � a e. � � m X a � Cs. .r�. � � m v ` i � ''. � � '+ p� ,o� �' eo r 3 J V �: �,,�, �. n 't , � � c R � G� .�' � � , �. w Q �i < � '� s'a -, n. ' � g r_ � �b io m R �, � :0 7. � . �' ,2 A a `� r � � -� ^ � .a ry � �' �i p� '�y,' � ,� �o a �- � �-+ � °' `n °: ' � � c °' '— c ° � $ � � � i+ s � a �y � 5� '" a � � �. � 3 � � o � � � � � ^� fl. 9' � � -� �: �� S � � �' r`� '' � � �' `' " `^ ; - �' " " g o� CtF m M^�$ e-_.'-�5r�y �"' '` w � � .�'3 �'� �•:� �'� "! 15 �+ prp y Sp�� Q ' � $ " ' �' � �. � '� j � •< x ��"� Fi'.^e'��- �� "�� 8 �(e�p � � � � � h � u• M P/ � m � � � � " � �i O r , � b � M �. :° � � �. du' �i To � a h � a. A °e� �s A t'o' 7 S � � ; . � e�s �c � n & �� ; � � � � e. 3 y � � 7 �� ? Wy^ " '� �l, � T�• � w �, � � 5- � � � �• �• � N� �. .v'. 0 nra ° �, co?ds: � � � � _m,da �• h m � � Sl � � fr�i �: � �. ~� � � � O ?7 r�n _'"�' � w � cz m o i � iro ro r. �gm�' � m � L� � � cr; �. �. � 8 � ,� � � °.'. w ��'� � ��O$.� `-. � � � � M 4M� � M � � �� .1 M .7 � �L1. m � � i�1+ O .�°. �y� �s � S. 9 a�o+ � PM � � � '. � r � M�l � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 7D [IC)W TI[F, NI;�JK� t,AW AI�t�I;C'I'S CI1'[E5' l� INANCIAI. I�I�;i'C)it'1'S: �. STA'I'I; !'(.ANNIN� AGI:NCY STA'I'E; AWI1'()ft is�;islnti�m !u impruvc Ihc aa��uru,y nnd tim��lin�ws uI r.ity fin�.icial ini:�nnatiun. ��y�r�l the 1978 I�r�;iJutiUe. C7ia{rter i£i7 af the 19?13 Minn�•u�t:► I.:��s �,TOtvx ��ul of rn�omm�•nda�tions rn+�r.le in u nq�n isgu�� b}• II�� Sltttr ('Irmnin�; A�;��n�� r.ntitlyd, "City 1� innnc:ial Ifc�x�rtin�;." T7�c Ir�;i�!t�tK�n �v:�w thr pralu�K uf cliscu5�,iun of thc pinnnin� �y;cr•cy's repnrt Iryth�• I.�:�ucof Citi�w, thc Jlunici�u+l I�inunce U(ticera' A.k��cintion, the Tt7inn�:��ta tirxri�ty oi C�Ttitird 1'u111ic Aca�iinteuu�, the Ulfice of the �, �italr A�u1it��r. nnd th�� Siatc I'lanning Agcncy—ts110! wi�ir,h sup��orttx3 ilm Ic�;i5lati�m. 71io lnw affes4s Il�c isiansicr ISl H�11C�1 lJOt{t Si8112[bry' $71Ci Cjl&iiFS �ati�:� nncl thc Stutc Auditor rc�rrcl (inancinl data. 71ro I�w d.x�s fuur thin�;s: (1 I It scts dendlines (or all citics to re�rt �inan�i�l datn to Ihr, Stnte rluditor. (21 It rcyttires cities over 2,500 pn�i�datiou to submit (inanrial inf�mnntion in oon[ortnanc�e with �rnrr�lly a�x��iletl navuintinfi princinals IGAAP) — wfiich rqcans on a m�:lificd ��r (idl•�ccn�al Lasis o( a�cvttnting. (3) It r��c�t�ires cities �u�d� 2.S(� Pnpidatinn to repori iinancial uiicnnxtion ui a fomm �nd style �xescrilxd by ttie Statc Auditor. (4i It makes the State Auc3itor 'rcs�msiLlc t�r de��elo��inh forn�s cities :liould follow wiien re��ortu�g: u�suru�� tliat rc�rts or auciits confvrm tv GAAI', and ei�forcing this c�nfonnity i( n�rnssary. Wl�at citics nuast du to a�m�ly �ith the law: All citi^s are requinrd ta adapt the cutendar year tss Q�eir ti�cal �•ear. A. Citics mcr 2.500 Fx�pulation. i►1wt cities rnust do to conq�ly icith the lew: Ail citic� are reqiurecl to ndopt the calendaz yeaz aa Qlicir feseal year. A. Cities ovcr 2,500 po{�ulation, l, l?rc�kzre n SinanciaS re�x>rt u� n iorm �?rescxilxij by ihe Stnie Aiiditor covering the F>re��ous }�ear�s operat;ons. 2. 1'rese��t the financinl report to the City Cotinci{, mnke copies available lo the puhiic, 4��ibli�li the report or a s•.unttinry of die rc�rt in a kx;at nc��sEwper, and send the rc�ort to die State Auditer. , 3. Pmpare finmicial report.s il2nt nocivatcly presa�t the city's i'uiancial pc�sition mid cvnfon:i to GiAAP, i.F , be bnsecl on n nwtiified or I�il1-accrual i�asis ot aorn�u�tu��. 4. Stil�mit to the S;ate Attditor ��idtin 18U d�q•s xf tcr t}te close of the fiscxl �•c:v nudited finm�cinl �tatementa ��t�icfi ha��e bmn �ttested to l�• a ccrtified �ubtic, uc�untnz�t, u public auawntant, or the 5tste Au�litor. :ludited finnncial �taterncuts mny fx s+cceptrd br the State Auditor'v� lieu of fin.ui.�ial reports. 'I?�is is utter4imtrd to m�an thnt i( the auelited fin:mcixl stntc�n�s�ts mn;orm to GAAI', th�n the 5tnte Auditor �,iU acr�•pt t}icm ii�ttcnd of I'u�nncial rc�rts I1�c Stnte Auditor's Of(icc, �.it1i thc siiEiEx�rt ot t}M Statc Plaruiing Ap,n�nc�•. I1:19 Iq9U0(� im unplemcnt�tio� �uid micurrni�nt �wticy it intcnds to lolk��v rc�;urd'uik his Eiro��eiun. : S. `ll�r St:tto Auditor ��ill a�ntimic to audit 11lim�eHjx�lis, St. 1'uul, atui D�dutt�. B. Gt�es Icss thnn ?,50� Ex�ptdntion: l. 111ny �•olunUirily ivimply ��tiih tl�c �nnu nquimnknte fer citics o�rr � 5!}0 Ex��udatKm. i.c., �u}xnit cithrr fuiunciul mports in putMrn�ann• �cith UAAI' or iiudits, or: . 2. AL»� prry�urc dctnil��ci fuuinrinl vtiu�y�x•nts in a st�•le and lorn� �Krsrilxvl b�• Ihi• St+itc :iuditur, file thc stutcm�y�t in citic.v of- (ic�:t. }�m�`nl thc st»tirrn•nt to th� cily a�unc'II9 t�lllllq '�.l /�A�'N ditcrtlu• (istxt! t�cnr. �wblivl+tho �tatem�vt in n nr�.��n}�rr ��ithi� Ml dnpw nn�l v�dKnit ihc �tiur011Yl( �ll iltC �Il1IP AHLIt(lN N7liltll ��O tlnya ntler Ihe cluac u( tl�c fi+c•nl yMtr. ,, 7 E ,C `ll�v State Auditnr will 1. Su�K�'vise tiie com•craion ui a11 eity tiric,ut ycurs to n c+:lchidnr ycnr Fuul u�aiuc llmt (inns�cin! aclivitir!4 A►'P CC(1()S'2Ci{ 711 ACM1ttiAl1OC Nith law. 'iliiy tivill !rc ncxort��di;lx�d in trflininu �c+s�ions tivou�;houl the Stiitc di�rin� 197fi. '��1C (fA101�l�! K9II I)C <�iC(7(t(M� by lhie St�te I'lanning Ago�cy in c��ration with the fNtice of thr. Stntc Auditor. 2. Nr��ribr. sununary Iortng for finnncinl stxtemente (or citiea 7hr..tie forms �.ill }m, mailed <lircdy W cities before )anuary� 1979 ancl �vill 1�c mude av�ilnble durir� Qic training sessions. i. Enforce r�x�uiremrntx thAt cities ov�r 2,500 ��ptilntion Iile nudit repc�rts Hitfiui 180 day�s ui }'car end, and thnt the repnris are in nccocclassce �riilti gcnernlly accepteci aa:ounting prin�ap�es tGAAI'1. Citics with a fiscnt yenr thut docv not correspond with the cxilendnr y�ar will receive sFxcial u�stnxdio»s from d�e State Auditor fnr a►o- v�rtin� to ihe calendar ycar. Howc��cs, citics on a fiscnl year nre en- mi�ra�ed to ch�u�e- to a calendnr yeaz us oi Decca�iber 31, 1978. Zhis �un Fx� accotnplist�ed by reporting on a shorter fiscul �ria3 during I978. Tlie issue of reF�rting fonnq and surrimary iinuncinl repo:ts �+il] he adctres�ed i�y a speciaf t��k force being assemblocl in cooperali<�n �vitL d�e Statc l'lanning Agency, t6c I.e�,�ue of i�Su�nesota Cities, the Minn�ota S�cicty oi Ccrtiticd I'uGlic :tccountnnts, and �ihe Munici�ial Financ�e (?((ic+ers As.oci�tion. At�dit rc�>orts for the ] 978 calendt►r year slwuld be filed �+ith the Mimscip�t RcPortin� Unit of the (Kfioe of d�e 5tate Auditur hy Jun° 30, 1979. Individual ci:ies »ill be contacted if the reports are not filed on n timcly b:tsis Extcnsions may be granted tmder renscrr,r+ble cir c�im,lances. T[ citi�.� ha�e unt ttir.de any urrnnge�neiits tor zu� euclit, th'W oiiice �+�11 appoint nn auclit firm 10 do the �vork, a.n3 th� cost �tiill i�e char€;ecl to the city. ' � All auclit reports received in 19i9 �+ill l�e reviewed ior nrLier�ce to GA.'11'. l�t�ruig thc fir.t year Iettcrs �vdl i�C u<_ued w the cit;es identifyu�g flm• arcas of si�iificant non-cotnplinnce. Cities und their auditors �vill be rzpceted to make thc approE�riate d�anges in ihe tinaneial rr,ports for the 1979 rC�xirtin� }'t �1r. My a�idit reports received in 1980 for the 1979 repor�ing yeur �ti�71 not Ixx acmptcd unless they are in sul�tflnt'sal oomptifu�ce with G� Al'. RFPnrts ��ith minor vari��ces fmm Gt1AP ��11 be bccepted m�tingent s�t�n m�l:ing aprropciate c{ianges in the »eact mporiind period. It isim�rtant t2i..t cities take n�te of this ne�v I�gisindon bc�cause if �itits fni{ to comply «ith thc proviyions ot the iaw, the Stt�te Auditor's (?[ticc is at�thorized t�a �nd its o��n persc�tmel or mntract. «ith privete firms tn m�u��l�te and t'sie [inan�rinl mEx�rts ar {inancial stAtemenis. The �u.t for diis is to be {�aid by die cities and can Ue dc�ducted from state m�a�icipai nids or nth�r sitttc-shared tnxcy due to the city. C]i�pter 7fi7 repres��ts u niajor commitment to impro��eci Cnnncial mtx�rtin� (nr M1linnt:�otn citic4. "llic.moperation und support of pubiic �urounrin� y�rofes�ion nnd city clerks euid fincu�ce olGccrs is essentiul to tfx� cI[i�ticnt un�ilc�nexriution and cffecii�•e niforccxnent oi 11ye kgislative �t. 71rai�ung '('iflyth�x��md �b�lla�ra 1�50,OOU) was npproprintcd to thc Stetc 1'In�inin:,� A��Kiry ti► hrlp�•itiiw mrnt dtc nrw nvZuirc►ncnts. 11ic E�Innnina 71:,�1YItV tll�l`Il<IK (O IIW thLw monew to pro�id�• d�•lailed ta•hniiad esvistance in tlH� („rn� ui trninieu: �tIYl�Tf11113 t�i i9ti�:v to h�•!p thcm nqK,rt linemeinl tnii�it��. o�� n m�KliG�til iu��ti•�ml Ln�ia `Ilx�.�x• t�tita thnt nt (er��cnt <lo nut n•�sri in �y»ifiarntmu�• ��ith i3AA1` ��iil ►x� tlw tnqjor Iuc��v oI thc pinrn►ic�•au,mti►�y'a lruuiin�; pn�;rnms. CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATION TO �OURMIES, FRANCE INQUIRING ABOUT TNEIR INTEREST IN �OINING ItV $ISTER CITY PROGRAM iWE ARE MEETING WITH THE STATE CNAIRPERSON OF THE SISTER CITY PROGRAt�1 ON FRIDAY AND WILL HAVE A LETTER PREPARED FOR �'�ONDAY EVENING�S MEETING) 8 r.._ . _ . . . . ._. ..�.� _�.��._.__ . . �. w .- � .... .. .. ..... . .._ ... . _ .. . _ � p . , N� � MEMO T0: Oick Sobiech, Public Works �irector ' MEMO FROM: Jerrold L. Boardman, C�ty Planner MEMO NO.: OS #78-47 • MEMO DATE: September 6, 1978 . - RE: Sign Plans for Shorewood Shopping Center, Rice Plaza, Holly Shopping Center, Osborne Road Shopping Center _ I am attaching copies of the sign plans for the above listed shap- ping centers for approval by the City Council at th�ir September 11, 1978 meeting. All of the plans meet the requirements as layed out in the sign co�e and conform to the present building design. Shorewood sho�ping center is the only center that is makinq major modification to the building structure and a mansard addition behind the signaqe. My only recommendation would be that any new signs should be placed on that mansard and not in the existing locaticn of signage as they"are suggesting. JLBJde � � 0 � �� 9R 379 2028 ST. ANTI�[�I�tY �ILLAGE SHC�PPII�C� GEriTER, Inc. • GENERAL OFPICES: AELMAG BUILDING 25 University Avenue S. E. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55414 Mr. Richard N. Sobiech, P.E. City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N.E. PridlEy, MN 55432 August io, 1978 Dear Mr. Sobiech, I enclose an overall sign plan for the Shorewood Plaza shopping center as per municipal ordinance. Basically the plan is to build a fake mansard-above the roof and behind the existing signage, to frame them in. I quote the new sign �aragraph found in the addendum of all of our most recent leas�s: "Signs to be erected on the demised premises shall con- form to the general plan for the entire shopping center to be provided by the lessor and in accordance with specifications set by the lessor° and the tenant shall not erect or permifi to be erected on said prem- ises any signs on the exterior of the buildings or premises not conforming to said plan, without the written consent of the lessor endorsed hereon nor piace or permit to be placed in any of the demised premises any weight in excess of the reasonable or safe c� rrying capacity of the structure, after being advised by the lessor as to the load capacity per square foot. installation and maintainance of said sign shall be the sole responsibility of the tenant." Signage , of course, shall conform to city ordinance adopted in Feb.ruary 1978 pertaining to the width of �he sign vis a vis the width of the store. As current leases are renewed we will request that the existing signs be modified to conform. As the tenants "turn over", the new tenant will, of course, conform. 12� I trust the en�losed drawings wil] be satisfiactary. if th�re are any questions please do �ot hesitate to cait. � S �Y� St. Ar�thony / �V ��i��'� t`erman Village Shopping Center, i nc. � ; �: ., ; � � ! . ; _ . f;. �.�� :. . . . . .. � � ,. ' . Y � . . .� � � . � �. , ,.:. A B . � � . .. � }� � x 4i a r 0 . : 1 �� X a : u. �,, . . f . . � '�' , _ y� ` � ' . . � . �y.� � � - �� . �� i w �. .._ . -- - , � .� � ; � 9 C . , , � x N y„ � r_r ' i' . • S � ••- � A ri . � � � � N . ��: � U � �x�� , � �--1 4 � 2 � � � . • ' �E ! --� `� � U u . . > a cn �(1 ,. lU � ,U � `� . .� ~ . :J � c� � ' ill � .�-. cL � . - � , Q S� 2 ` . k�" �' r : � � ; �� . } . , d . •' Q : � � � .� . � ". � �� . . � .. '� �:h . � . . . . •-. . � . . . o . . � , . � . ... .� _ � . �. ' ' • .. - . _ ' . � . . ' . � �'�i O. . � . . .. . .. . � X � . . . . . ... , .. .. .. � - . N . - -_...' . ..' _. _ _ _ . . . . : , . , '�_. � . -�_�...... . _... _' "_.� . . '._' . . ' .d o� . � . , . . . . . . • , � � . ' . . . - ' ' � � . .� T. . ^ .` � ' . . � . . . . . . . ""� . . ' . �. . . ' . � � . ' _ . : . . S �I . ., �J� � . � � . . . . � �� .Y` . a �::i� i � - =�;. .5. ' �,t � .'- ` ' . . . � : . . .. '�,' � y . ' . . a -a„ ; . _ �, Q � � ti . ��,i � . . � ^) . ' �: �� a-� -----�--- . �11 r � �' _. / J ' : � t - __ _... __�� +� . �-# � �� _ �� i'� � � a � '.+ ..` • � ;� , —y._. q� 1, , f x 4 � � • . ci 5 � � V �+� - :� � • i � w ° ° Q .. .. „ � - . :(�� E � � � � ::�.�; . . .� ., . .,f � . �� . �1 . I { a .. 2 � N. , oo:.. . �� i: N 0. � � � a� . � � S � .�, 'i' � , . .x : � Q co o � � � .. ' x !t u '�'j ; I . : � �-- � �� . ' . . ��_ � J �.�._.�...�1 . � . . ' � r. . . , ' Q: , . . . . U: :j , 'z • � tL► � � `i `,. � . �' • . � ,�� w � �--�i � _ �� . �`� . � -=� ��_.___�. .. . � � . _ . t � . • . , :. - . , --._.. �- . .. ,. , � , . , .r ; , • . .. . , � � . .. , . . � . � . �� . . . . ' • ' . . \� r. � . , . . ' • . • . I .. ,,• • . ,, i• , _ a �, � ' , . � / � � . . � • ( . . . � ��1 • � ��' �.•:: � � � j� . , . • ,• ` ,, . ,. • ; :� ;. .. :. , . . I,..I..,;. f . ,' . 9 D �: , . . . �::� , . � ., ��: . . . � � . , fu ; . , ., .;. : . +' , ., r, • � ' � � � !� '`` \• . t•i r. . . '' . „ ''. �'' • s ' " . ,lN� �•4r .. ,• .s' ,� ,1,•.. . ,�; / . . . . \. . , . : •��, n �� ._.....,�1 � . _ . •�' •�:,�'' . . . . .,; ' r.. � �..' �,. .� ,� L—i1� \� � . � ' i, . '�; � . . . •4 , �! tn ;. �� ` �� ., ;.. � . r ; �,s , �. f : ,r'; � :, i" f �',;, T `• ' � .'w �'' '� +.r .% ' r r ' ' • r �''� , j %� ' • � :. . ' '. � t•!� � ! '� .. ,,:. ', f'..�; , • ` ~ � . ` � . t ,�,•� .tCL �.�. l '� .';�' . `y-; .' . ;., �. � � ; � �� . �� rj � : � �` \ t ` �� i•� � . . �' . y � ( . , \ \ ♦ . ,� r �., ,".,-� l' � � •.�++ . ` ••''' N : ; l l. . n .' . � . � ' : _ } : �" 'y"}. : y•{' �i��. 1 � � :' . Y• • 1�� . . r ' - " � . �l�l � � y�. . . �:� . t�' ,i ,; ; + :�`' . � � . s y } , 'i _ �. � J.. • . `a , . t °j. " � � �'� , ` , • , ' J �s Co � . � � . E !� ; t , ' � '. * /f a_� 'a' . � -.� � . ryrl ^ - . ,. � ,�. � A `'; ,s �� t • • �f n :� j' • �, �;�1 • '� ,� � ;yf . � • • : ye.' / . i'9�� r i�'{- i Y� 1 .. i •t'i7 - � .. /; ��( ^s � i � � i • : _ , , 1 r 5`J{ ` '-'•;yac �' Y Ii l..� t� j� i . .i -i � � .. ..!;.� . ''�°�� ' �' y � � i'�s.,� �:.A` �.�'� � . . '�• •r-' . � \ + i�� •'#i�. �.s, f .Y...c E� �,��1i� � i ' • 'r rl � . � �. : � l.` � � � : t , { . _ � � � 41. d:. � ,� ��•i'; �i��'t �) • . f ! `, � t � . "S _. .� �£r �.': — ��i . . ' . . . - � � - .;,:.., � . �,....,.,,�„' � - Q .1 � � `' ' . ,�� . i : . � . � . , �► ._.,,,,,��,w,,.,,�„ � ' . � � - :. . Ef _ I �� , . t � A .: > . � ; ` -�n�--s�;-��c*,�,.. ----�.�,«_ ,.�� =l--� +�: � ; _� }. ry I-1� s , .� _ fc� �. � ;, , , � ^s � `st � �� 4� ' 7. 3 ;r� � � � ♦ -�_i 1 • � • . . .� �.� � . T. , a �. • .. ^1 ��.�..��__._{ i� . � . i , � , t a ,y' ` S } .� � � �• 1<?! � � .�.' � tY, >' ` J X '. E `�. �' �. . s �"E 'i jt - •� �:'. � <�,- � , . � , , t � . � 's : < # �� i � _t i ' '�° �� r 3 } ,�' .�v^,r, � . � �� : � � . , + w �_ � • ; S ; Y 1 R • � . ' —.t �� F�! ` __ � I � � 1 1 � .i � �� , i+ s �j ��,� ` �� - L""'t , � iii�` r� '�a.� i.- t , :� ' ti� ' ' � _� � � E <s � „', � 'i y ,� r � a , : ' { � . � ' � ` ' ' : � � . . �,, . . , y' . it - '. . �° ,`� j., � , ; j - Q � � � . � : (.� O . �t.' .-� .� . d � �" 1.) h .. •r � . :.� '' „/�j�,;�.. _ _ y'� �' ��.•7.,t s � bo•'., � : _ : : . ' , � � i � _ }.� ,, �-`^- � ' j � , n � ;"'� .� • � ; � f � �S '/ 1 '} . 1 1 1 l . . � .. � � _ t� � ; 'j�� . �i �� ;` . . ��! -+ i. � ,� � (. L�Y V ... ' ' { i-� -i _ �a� t ' .� . . . �" [j { �� . J-�.� 1 . r . + • . � � '� � � � t . O �i { � 1 � o . �.. i. � ' i �G � • _ , � ' , i ;�F--. +{ .;y �;' � : �„ ,: .c,�' � � `. , '' � �� L f k i..: w 3 ?� F '�` , + �� f �. ..5 . l.' •� . 1. _'f .`a Rk ��- �� . • +�� , � � iI '' •_ • ' . . \` ' �. ;� ' `7 rMT� �t��= . � �~�� . 1 h t � t r re�� sas�VlMr. � . � • ' � . � ' r � � �' � �• ,: . �. . . . � ��- . ; � � _l� =�� . . ��. y f: .�';' .. . . �\ �. . � . � . 1 •��1 � ' � t . . , . . ' . " , i� �. . � • 1:� r • .1�� .. SI . .• �l • • . . i .' . . .• . � i �' j�) . . ' . � ;,: ,•. . . ,�� .� K i . .3 �: ��E ...•. s. Y . .2 t • . ' ; .ri t ' • �/% ' , `.� '}'� ' ��r .i , r. .,' , • •'a' � � . , 4�� i��.: . �; � � . a•, . 2 ��. .. . . ' • - ' � . � . , �.�% . � . � � � � • , .. '� , x� .�� - � • . � , �� ` �, . . • � ''' ..� � •, \ � ,'.•Lt ` . . '• • � � ',. ... e .ti' � `,w '' ' ,' �. •'� -. � .. .. . ' n '• T•, 's , . � � � . . . . ♦ r.. ,� '•L t• .., . ..:��. j � • , . � � , � ' . � ' . . .. . .. . �. . . . • • ' ' . . , '� . ' � . . . , • � , . � . , . . .. . . . , , � . � . . .. � 1 . � 544-6763 SUITE 202 ?S 15 WAYZATA BOULEVARD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 July 31, 1978 City of Fridley City Planner 6431 tlniversity Avenue 23.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Attention: Mr. Jerold L. Boardman Dear Mr. Boardman: ' . Enclosed find comprehensive sz.gn plan for Rice Plaza we are submitting in accordance with Section 214.049 of the Fridley Sign ordinance. Please advise *.�hen the plan has been �pproved. Yours truly, RICE PLAZA �Y C..../ :L� d Paui Levy FPL:h j Enc7.osure sa�a- �9. ,E • a 0 RICE PLAZA 1. ALli SIGNS SHALL BE MOUNTED TO THE FACE OF STORE WALL, 1'-6" BELOW TOP OF PARAPET. . � 2. SIGNS MAY NOT HAVE ANY MOVING PARTS OR HAVE ANY SOURCE OF LIGHT WHICH CHANGES COLOR OR INTENSITY. 3. OVERHEAD OR ANY OTHER FORM OF EXTERIOR SIGN LTGHTING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. �LZGHTED SIGNS MUST BE INTERIOR BACK LIT. 4. TOTAL SIGN AREA P�7�Y NOT EXCEED 15 TINES THE SOUARE ROOT OP THE TENANT In�ALL LENGTH. SIGNS MAY NOT EXCEED 3'4" HIGH, AND MAY. EXTEND ONLY T� WITHIN 6" OF THE PROJECTED LEASE LINE. 5. FtJTURE SIGN PYLON.SHALL NQT EXCEED 25' IN HEIGHT, BOTTOM OF SIGN MUST BE AT LEAST 10' ABOV£ FINISHED GRADE. SIGN FACE SHALL NOT EXCEED 80 SQUARE FEET PER SIDE. �• - � �C� �'�� *•---��-�-•..�. r�.�i� .�� .�+� 0 � .. � ��8�� date comm. no. 9� I .' ., -: . � ., -�--- : � �r=i: � i 1 . I . . � -ac_,�,.-�: i _ —j �; �, � f __ i . x� � � ' . :�t� I • ,x�?.' .. � '�-- , . - � i. , i �i ; �:: I--._.. ; � . _x:T� + � _._ � .�...�� .. i . �� .. �� ' .,��...v� , � .�_ i - • �' i �..�r i i'i I ..._ ��'.... .____-... • �_ � �� i- � ��. i 9 G ,. . � � �� , . ; , .� � i i � m! . . m ; � � � . a � � s . : q N ' N CN. , G....�� i5i� 1 ••�J�"'i \• t . � .. y,t�B� . . �� k�;isr �si' `,,�.v:� - � g;i- t;�a; . � � � � A„�� l� . • . 1 ��' ��ts�t�2 �i1� r 3ir.4�94 g . . $ ._ , _ . � 1 , _ . .. . �/�� • � � � ' . — _ . ,�� ; � �_ .... ._._ __.•.. .... e . . • �i-� � ' ' . ' �. ' � .___' _ ".\ � . . �... _ ......"_"" . � �c : . _ . . � � � i . . ' ,' : � . . ` ; . . . � � r�t.l � • ,. i � ; , � � . `J) I�, . . � ,__,, i : � . ��_ ,� , `,�,�; . . . � �, � � . ! � <<'� � �� . � � r.ii:'� � � i . � • . i . . _ � t � .�� . . � . 1 � � � � � ^•' .yr� � `K ' � 1 • • r.� . o.�..r�r . . . . . . . . . • 544-6763 SUITB 202 ?515 WAY7_ATA F3QULEVARD MINN�APOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 July 31, 1978 City of Fridley City Planner 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Attention: Mr. Jerold L. Boardman Dear Mr. Boardman: �Enclosed find comprehen�ive sa.gn plan for Holl.y Shopping Center we are submitting in accordance with Section 214.fl49 of the Fxidley Sign ordinance. Please advise when the plan has been approved. FPI.:h j Enclosure Yours trul.y, PR03ECT NUMBER SIYTX-ON.:�CORPORATIQN By .� , red Paul y �s� 9 H � � � 2. 3. �„ 4. 5. � ,�'C°� HOLLY SHOPPING CENTER / 1 ALL SIGNS SHALL BE MOUNTED 6" ABOVE TOP OF CANQPY AND 2" �BACK FROM FACE OF CANOPY. SIGNS MAY NOT H�VE ANY �MOVING PARTS nR HAVE ANY SOURC£ OF LIGHT WHICH CHANGES COLOR OR INTENSITY. .� OVERHEAD OR ANY OTHER FORM OF EXTERIOR SIGN LIGHTING WILL NOT BE PERMITTED.' LIGHTED SIGNS MUST RE INTERIOR BACK LIT. TOT�L SIGN AREA MAY NOT EXCEED 15 TIMES THE SOUARE ROOT OF THE TE�IANT wALL LENGTH. SIGNS MAY NOT EXCEED 3'-4" HIGH, AND MAY EXTEPID ONLY TO WITHIN 6" OF' TfiE PROJECTED LEASE �, LINE . .. SIGNS FOR MAJOR TENANTS�A � B MAY NOT EXCEED 7'-0" HIGH. ' TOTAL SIGN AREA MAY NOT EXCEED 15 TIMES THE SOUARE RO�T OF . THE TEI�ANT WALL LENGTH, PLUS THE SUM OF THE ALL4WABLE SIGN AREA NOT USED BY THE t�:T�iER. TENANTS. TWO-THIRI}S C66-213%) OF THIS EXCESS AREA WILL BE APPLIED TO THE SIGN AREA �LLOWE� AT MAJOR TENANT A. ONE THIP>D (33-1/3%) OF THIS EXuESS AREA WILL BE APPLIED TO THE SIGN AREA ALLOGIED �'OR MlaJOR TENANT B. FUTURE SIGN PYLON SHALL NOT EXCEED 25' IN HEIGHT, BOTTOM 0�' SIGN MUST BE AT LEAST 10' AB�yE FINISHEi� G$ADE. SIGN �'9CE SHALL NOT EXCEED 80_SOUARE �'EET PER SIDE. ) -I S- 80 _"" .-1. �,, " $ `� �, '�i � � . �� t� A Q ifl��y,�� -�^^� • - O - 0 . 3 y,�N �;.�� 1� h � �'� � — H�f� Ce��ei �'�� i . . . �r�$��t� � .,, s ;.� i C�atB comm. no. 9I � „a.�+ .��.0 A � . � �r...... � t' �� • i':: ij ��.; , ii � ' . .,.. , �� ..1;. � ; . . j�. �� . � , � i; � ° ;� . - . ._..-�--.��....... .. ........_..�..�._._..�N �MWAv /I1(S1JA�U(i , • • .�...._.►.�_.�°. :.'�'� � �-- -------� �.---_._.. _._ �..�.._... ��-�-. _ __. .._ -�- , -_ .- . _ . _ - �� . . .. � �� •�..., � y�`�, �,�� - ------.�---p . �c ' \ '� � . - ,�+ � ' • ' n , , , , ., ..,--.. �,�:� _�r y, S 1 i ( L. . —��s � n I i . � . .. �i '. \,\ . � �� ,f �I�y .J . �' ; ��..._..•. �+ I �M ' ! �� '� :�',�_j �'L' �� :; ' � ti t. f �:; . � �. �� --iC-- � , j; _. . _. `, I � . � .; ' k i��'' r� � . � � ��,:. -°� - f i :. , ' . . I,i• fP� � rL -�. . i . .�j ' �i ._.� � • • f :� -�' � �. �' � - ' . _ ;' 1 � . ; ,. ;-t , � =,; - � .�.. ' �i . j� -:<.... , � � . t � , ,' t � � #. `1T .(i . . k ' X_ . + fi, •y , X � g � ' _____� .3 � ; t -"t— _ _I.- . .. � . � � ' . � �,' � . � � ' .� t . s . .� ��!`'1 �� :� - .: [ ° a; .; _J a � _� � � � _ J ,• -r} , J `,' j ! -� '� ' � �; � � { X�x— ;,1- -- • � �?�__ -., ;'" -- � �i� _.; I � :; ; � � t' �i �� ' ..._.::! "—�i �� .. -i x! �; . .� �� j � � ! � �� l�p 1 � c ,� _. 'x' �� . .�. � � ��' � �_ I -:�-- i; , , � : - � ; ;► ;: �� ;� � I �: �� ,�v * ��' x[". -._I �.. �; �' ..... . � : j � � , w� i .� x. f! I � i a ' as ;_,� � � _{. �j:.:.� z � �-- ._ -� � ► _� ' I � �� T, _� ��{., ,. �� ' � .__ .i1 � `'� —,� I *: 4. .� i � : , �j3� . �' ��' `.. � ; . �� . r ' � �� t . _ � .;r-�.. . . � ' � �.l � :� � i1. - 1 Y • K.,W,,;a� � / ��MM�'M�Ilflaw`W�1.4WiM04M�Cl�M/TXt�M1f'�I�AMfafM� '��'t ' . . - � ' 1 '. ' � � I • ' I. ,� • • � , . � .� : � .� i . + �i � ` � r � �: � �i p _'. �+': ( � v'-i -; . �. :;. , !� � t :i , A = • � �� . 1 ; „a .. ,�;- -: . � _ � �: �_� :! . ,� •� i � a � �• f . � 1 � :; �i . `:c _.... g !� :. ..�; i�-- .. . . ��,-- �; _.... . _ _ _ _ ___ " _"_ S . ..�_.�� ; �{'S� : Ll -a ! i )� : C�J i '' i :. �;-� i !,�� 1 � -1,� � , (;; J � � ! � ; . c;�:, • . ;i:� � r.;,._ , .. _ :�•�� I e m N �a a � �� ; .� J� � . -- -- -, � , . � Z J a ° .- - . �9K . . � ; Q �RA�S •.��NI�EI�.SCJN, Inc. REAL ESTATE ANO CON�TRUCTION April 21, 1978 Nir. Jerrold L. Boardman City Plannex - City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue North East Fridley, MN 55432 Re: Comprehensive Sign Plan Osborne Road Shopping Center. 314 - 323 Osborne Road ?lorth East Fridley, hiinnesota Dear Mr. Boardman: Enclosed herein is a copy af our proposed comprehensive sign plan as requixed under section 214.049 of your city ordinance. The proposal includes the following as requ?red undex section - 214.049: 1) A site plan showing the location of the center 2) Building elevation showing t3�e proposed si.gn scheme 3) Documentation enabling Osborne Prop�xties to instali a pylon sign in the future in accordance with youx sign ordinance, published November 30, 1977. This proposed comprehensive sign plan �aill becor�.c �ffeetive kThen - present tenant leases expire or are reneweu ox when present signs sustain sufficier.t damage to waxrant r��jor repair or replacement. I would appreciate your review and comnents of the enclosed. If you have any auestions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, OSBORNE PROPERTIES /�1/'t.t.L� / r. i�tiV�W�t-�- Robert R. Johnston RItJ/grk Enclosure ,------_ _ . ________—.___ __ _ _. t5 ;� � �111"1.1J � •A1�DERSOIiT� .LZl(�i. AE�°+�+.. ESTATE ANU COTVSTRlJC71Ct�1 ��. R09ERT R. JOHNar'TON PRpPERTY MANAOEMCNT OFFICE: 812 332-72B1 525 SOUTH EIGHTH ST. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 525 SOU7H EIGHTH STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5�404 PHONE: 612 332-728'i 0 .a.,. � • . ,. ,� : .� � �C+F .; � i : �s• r ` � ' I f � �. � � -� E� '1 I n� ; � . �� , .: , , ��,, . =� .:.: :• � �-�, .� ;: _ ; •'. '� `.�; • � � 9L � �o�■ M ' , . . . .� r:- c,l?n� ti�n :' �. r r I 1!31'%? 1 ;� �_,� 1 � 1. I � i:� in�enc?ed ttt�t ttle ^i?•<<ir��f of the :;t.<�r<?s a�; tr►e C�: borr�e �'r•operties Cer.ter .,hs:�ll re develo�ed a.r� ar; ir.�►�-in�tive and varied mariner. The criteria herein be2o�•� set forth shall �overn. .?. r1].tho�i��h ��revious arid cur.rent �i{-nin�; practices of the Ten��nt r:i11 be considered, they �vill. not �;overn :sir;n:; to be 'r.stalled at this property. 3. !',p�,rov�l ef store desi�n dra�vi�l�s o.r work�.nt; dra�:�i;�e�,s ��i�d srecific�tions for Tenant's leased premi�e:; does r�at cor�- stitute a.ppro,�al of any si�,n work. Landl.orc�'s v�;ri tten �E�p?�o��l of Tenant's si�n drawin�s and specification� ��re required. la. Th� �'ur.ni shir.{T at�d instal] ation of a sigri and the cu�t^ iricurred shall be the responsibility of the Ten:int. Si�Tn cor.stri.ct� on �.� to be completed in r.ompl5.arice wi th� the instructions contair�ed within this brochure. 5. E:�ch Tenant �vill be required to iderit,ify its premises with a. si�n. Details 3. �xteri_Qr Si�ns 1. Ten.jrit si�:ris shall be store iderti �y signs o�ll,y. ?_. Ten=in�ts �vi 11 be a1l.oca.ted an area on the exi;erior canopy oI' the buil�ia r�� equilivant to the .iineal front fao�;a�� of • the le�ses �remises. �. Tenant's si�;n shall be an interior illuminated si.�n jfer detzils and s�ecifications enclosed. Tenar�ts siE�rl Zs to be ceritered on the canopy both vertically and horizantall,y. � �:. , A.11. 1?�-ht sources shall be concealed �vi�hin tr,e t.enrin�:� s�{;n c.�t�ir�et. No exposed lamps or other l�.ght fi.xtures v��i.l]_ be r permitted. � ' Ce Fylon S��Tns 1. The c�evelop�r reserves the ri frht to a.11o�v or;e (1 ) free st�ndiri�? �ylon :�it;r� at the O�borrle Pro��er�y �ite. 2. 5�ac:h si{;n shall corlform to the hei�ht and scjuare foat:i,�e rec�virer�ent�; of the si.�n or,dinance of the City of l�ridley .. dated T�ovember 30, 1977• 3. If the devc�loper so decides to eYCerise his ri{;ht to a.r�sta].1 a�ylon si �n� such si��n :�t the developer's dr-.ci�i on car� ei ther i denti fti► the devel.opinent onJ.y. a ten�ant in the development. or several tenants in the development. rl- � � �� . �.. I .. ., � . _� i i _. I' 7' `� `I{{{ i 1 :� � I � � t � � � � • •' •' � �� ! [•_] ' � �'(` � � ° �. . � �� i . �.j �3f {L'.:. � ��4 r � . s i �•j. �! �i► _ � ►�-i i. • � _.� .�, �uJ : �;� �� = i •� j .I r � � ! i' � �'� r��, . , � �: �. . �� .� �� .�, � � d ', y �� '� n ► 1 6 � � � � • � �� ,�� i i 1 � � I I _J� 3 � « y � ` ° � [ � • = � % 1 c �� 2 s � v � �, x 3 . aR � � � s > � i . _.. :b � �� ' � � � � �'� o o a o d� ac 1 � / ' t Y.. % 1 o ' � , °�• O J O U r� a _w_.� . � . � � � ` t . ( 1 a z �� ., � , , � i , N � 1 � ,• I a 'o Q'o �. •= d ��,= � s- o � �� < io �' � ; ` ,. � � � i �» � �� . :l _ � �1 ` �; � � �i '^ , , � �� .. �.., �� , „ , . �f � �� f � �� ..� _ �� -'r- - '-___._ � _..__-- ! � ,� " :e. ' i �'_—'>:'_ i ��.�3� �� , �s� ��.. � • ♦ ; 'A� • ,-`rii - / ' � ` ti' � �,;;,, .� Q •s nj'� �I � , � I O �i � � W ♦� � 93 �t � � < � o m�� a 1O � ro � � M p`a N � V K O a iu a � > ¢ m N W O a � � a � � a � W y�� V1 N = O Y � � d �� . � � .... Q. `��M _� V�o �� . �o �� FN i� aa � � c Z � � � � Z � g _� ¢�xa �� N �� C � � � � N �'D � � � � � �� O � C /w � vs� c �� c� �� .i d > �•� � � . � � � . � � ��.. ` _ ._ . : ,. • R � ...V r � r. ohi ;.�i ted Si t;ns w ip. 't• �. k � , • t;; T�le �'a].J.oti•��r��; type� of :si��ns or si�;n components will be FR�HIBI'rED. 1. 2 3• Si�;ns emPloyin� exposed raceways, ballast boxes or trans- formers. rlo�rin� or rotatin�; signs. 5i�-ns employin�; movin� or f lashin�. lights. 0 4. Si�ns employin� luminous vacuum formed type plastic letters. K Individually illuminated or non illuminated ?etters. E. Cloth, ��ood, �aper, or cardboard si�ns� stickers. decals �r r�inted �i?ns arotind or on exterior surfaces (Doors and/or v�ind��s ) of the premi ses . 7. Si�-ns employin� noise makin� devises a.nd components. E. Si�ns rvhich do not conform to city rc�;ulations which are not covered under this section of prohibited si�ns. Si�n Ap�rovals Procedures for obtaininL, approvals for sign drav�-in;s. 1. Tenant sha1.1 �ubmit dr.ativin�-s a.n�l s�ecifications .for �il i ts ��ro��osed si�n work. Three ( 3) sets of cira�:i r�{�s vfi Zl. be re�t�ired by the DeveloPer. The drawin��;s shall clearly s�iow lccatiorz of .the si�;n on the iasci� of the c�ria;�y, �ra�hics� colors� construction and�attachment detail�. - � � 2. The Developer shall return one (1 ) set of the si�;r� drawin�;s as s�on �s Possible to the Tenant. ^lhe drawin�7s �vi�l ei ther be marked "ApUroved" ."Approt�ed t3ased on I�:�ndlord' s P:�dificatiol�s", or "Disappro>>ed". Si�n drav�rin�*s that h�ve been "Approved" or "Approved 33ased on Lanc3lor.d's 1'::ociificatior�s" will be submitted to the City of Fridley for issuarce of a s��n T:ermit. Sir�;n� n�arl:ed "llisapproved" are to be redesi�ned and resubmitted. -4- • r� " 10 � CITY OF FRIDLEY PETJTI�N COVER SHEET Petfrion No. 19-1978 Date Received q,uqust Zg, jg7g object Petition for an Alley from 59th Avenue to 6Qth Avenue and Between Main Street and 2nd Street.- • � , petition Checked By �� D�te - �-3/ - ?� � Percent Signing ��,� Referred to City Council � /� l�� Disposition 0 ��" 10 A P�TITION FOR WAT�R, SENER LATERALS AND 5TR�ET 5URFACING FRIALEY, MINN�SOTA nATE �u� �. � � To the City Council of Friciley, Minnesota: {Ve, the undcrsigned, constitutin,� more than fifty-one percent (51%� of the property owners in nur.iber and in interest, in the following , streets: ., � Alley �;�/�t1, fram 59th Ave. to 60th Ave. and between Main St. and 2nd St. .. Street, from to Stxeet, from to wha will �en�.fit by the proPosed i;nprovement, hereby petitian that the fol.lowing improvements be made: , 1, Bituminous Surfacing � 2. . 3. lti'e understand that tlie cost oi said i.mprovem�nt �vill be assessed agninst the benefiting propexty in the above �escxiheri area,at an estimated xate cf $3.61 per foot. • ' �N Address i.egal Descri tion `i � i�-t ,�.-z ��- �i y S" �` �. S�� 7_3 �. ..� �. 7 � � � �%�~-�t. yc l ° � ; �'l,G.�.�� , ' �� • /'( 7B� � b o c� � �,(�rti1rA�'nD.hUD�I%c�b'Vi_ .• �CIc��-'� �"' �f/G•� ._ �,� �: V � ✓ �j.' ✓r �� . •� � . V ��e _ � � „ � - ��z� a �'n�.�� ' lt --i C .� �. J .� S°J 1-s'' �,l�J,�.�__�%2 � �.` 2" z � , ��-� � �C�� = � _ r i1 /% �- � �^ . _ � _ ., _ �'�� "S %7 s`� 7ilr � � , 'l4' V / V 1 ,�i ,� ��l'3.� r �� n �`/[' 7�'`' ��C.�i , _ �. �T ,� vv a? 8/ �vtL.�, �q�,,d,_ �LD � t� f�..% q t�2e. Pa,t-�c. L I hereby certif}� tliat I have checkea tlie above petitianers, and they do S?��BS�S constitute more than fifty-one percent (510) of the o ��ers in the area � afiected. � � �� /) 0 0 t 'n y . �:. . �� -.. . ``� . . . , ' . � .LO ✓ ,L�! 1 � S , . :. : �� r . .'.'i " . . : �. �. ... l f . r �� ' , i, PET'�T��.01d /F�9'1y%t3 t �� +•.µ � , f� . � . �. ' � ,. i ; � .-. . ;;:• , .. � : : . . , , ' • . ,' � , , . i u��r: ; . •F ", 'r• .. <. . , . ,, „ . r . - -+ � . . � . � . ,_ . . . . , . ,. .,. .�..._.�. .�. , . . .. . ,: �... . . , . .�.'.... , ' -. ��: � . ....: �.,''.: , ;,.r.� ,.�: �.,...-:�:�..., ,_�.a.__., ._._. �F.r��.,�.�,. �.-c.�� ..[.� ... . ., _ NW' OR v , � s :y �,� ��" � y�.Y � �.R,. , . .. �C; .3 , , , w � .. � �,, 4� , . , . �.'. . _ ; .� � r ; t � ��-,,; " � . �„r � �Nwr•tleil'1 - . - �n y � LBf.�Z "•� -s. �+�� -� �, . . ;"' ' ;a -' � �' _ . _ . � -�� , �•, .. .-^'- .� , �.. .; - ✓�'��.......� .. .' ... �.� �9 . �' . . . + i"'. .:'y �°' , ) ti^`�,�.; /zs tio -G � �t�i rio ^ �ClA :. ! Y i s! Fc � � .i "�i ' f� ,, �, y•.y/�y� o ah'f .^� �. [ y� i „ r / �---- . -i �S7rL'4F � Zt�,-' , / p � V_ V �R� , _ ^�,J �Q. �IV �.�^ ' . 1K• O..w � � /� '1� �` �ti�, 30 ` _ ��2 � '` �' � . - Z9 ' Z . . q ' 2 . � ,,,�a„�, • 1 s 7�Gi 6 � � 1 fK . g . . ' L I �� ' a ,Y � G� / � 0 � :. �.� �� 2�'' � 8' ' lj��,� �7 �� t:'' ?� 28:- -� ;:� ��. ; ' _ � �Y f� - �� 6�3� • 3 2`T. . ¢ . z? �_ �¢ ` . 5_� � . :..:� �- � - =st �� *� b 6 . � �t 1 �; t�a2 .� ,� � .. _ 2 S :: �" :� , z =�•,r� 2�-` 7 Z• .�3._: .' ZQ 9 -�: •_ d24.. � �� 2 � - Z3,� g B - �-•� z . ;. ,,. , :� �_ � . . � � �-� ��_ : �Z . _ � _ � - ► - -�. :��r • 2 � - 9r = � . ,�.�a z1�< ..��- � .J .j' �yks . " ' ?`'.. e._�ip - .. -•- Z�•. �� •, � G !/ . . � �. . Y it � , . . � ' . O Y � y � �x;.� �O -, - /` ZO'• , � - -� � �t ... � \ `�� ,,� Oi�: . -\: a�. jt� �; � 20 ��ti .r . � ,"•` /Z . � �.:.; � i /� : /g ' �'�4� 18X� - � _ �•f3• _ B." _ .� W 1 r� _ i8_. , / `{.;>. �B`'" � ' ` � � . O� . .. `,¢ . : : •/? , !� � %� : _ �. -� ,;. Q �.. 5r , - � -� Y� � � � ,o��"r,5,. 1. �-:��r�.... � �. - , �i ��.� ' �.� � . .a� , ,� 5�� . z. / - , !s : - o . ; ° � /� `' " /6 . .^.•Qu�� ` `. P* �- i.- /� . - /3- " e ' ' . ,_ , {� s . 0 �.: T ., :. � ,- -�, - - '�:i-. �W. . . . :. - .. ` .� _ ,. ;_ fr _ ~ e_ .� , t �tt •v _ ,'r'� 'FC'°� . ;. ... .. . . . . Y�f'? , 3� _.t a �� ',.... jOSS ' f+ :�v ��•:� ` a� . . . ' �% � � ��^ , �oJ ,�i r e j >g ._ ` ,tltas�. . ... , 3 % o � s; o � •. ?\[�� _ l ["� g O p .. ..' " .' . ... 3 r. ss � 9 o.-r'�yg— '" S s4 - 3`�� -- �'-� --- - � . _ 29 Z : �: : . _ 29 _ ' �`b �� . �. 2 . ,. �1-�- . , � _--„z : .3� �74 -i� Z� � : : - , _ , . , �_. *. � T � : :. : .. : _ , ; � 5 9-�t 8 -- - �-r- _._ ` '+ ,�` ¢ i� ¢ � `�� _y� � :r- 2 - , :.. 26 .4-5. � � S �= Z _ Z6 ;-.r:,' �f � -N z : _ �- _ � rs�3 F g5 �.- " -c� _ � _ _:t �= 26' •, � �L . ��, g � _ =59ad� - � . 2s � , t+.1 : z.s::�. n � �. �� g� 5�l . T.-� �� - �93�`� -- � 2�:=�k -{'a��.: �- ' .. 23 � , _ Z. r r z.3' �j :� 23 � Zj� L, .�� 2 \ � �� , � 2z. � .._ ; - ---2G:. . ,.. 1a,i t � , . ,� , 2 f __ • �p _; - Sc��,,3 _ -i , ` /' . . �-��,- � - , : �� : �► .'�. , � Z , _ ,. � � --- , � ., _ - _ _. , _ � � _ �_ -- - � ��*`'� �8 . ,� � � + � �� — , � � 59gt: �§Qp`-� � s .,s oc c Io s � �► - `_..,597H �� : AVEI�UE� �OU� �f� .. ti Ji'� sa�r= ' `� � o ' s � . _� ,�- ; Z �� , �' 4 N ° "2 T 5�q�C 8�► -- �-- - ' 4J . ' Z¢ � � 5�� Z� _ ., � , r� n� . • �, c.� CRs�.. � . S�� Z .' Y: � •.. 1n1 7l � � - id.E: , o � _. - :s$�r� � /5g� ' � ,58�a _ � . , �: _._¢ �• �5845 g�d � 5gs4 b-= N $45 g�q M �O , s834 � ° 58� .. -5� 32 - ��,_ ` °5&Z9� � e , y °58i��' '�zb . ,� : • 582�f 5£Ytd ��tr—: . . ;� .. ,., L�81� ; ... �� _... v. . �. zO ' r !9" " "-;• S 3' ��p°:- •'/eP: - •eyq;. . � _i;- �'6R�1��.� �rhe �� i� ti-o n p� /6 �, � \:00� ,"//%f"ii': yaa�., :� �,., ,i ,-i; --.;c , � :� �e�_. j :.'i �s�b_ b � . q • -, � , � • � � ' a �lJ�� _" :� ._.� ��.3 '�•f� ¢ ;- - � M � ; � ��i1 � :, i¢ t';-°; ; � : �" : � . �q ��_ � , J 1 i � � � � 6� •"� �� . -f`- � •t•• a .. . w,�'� � ��// � � Z .. � ,�ri. a ' � .,� � .�x ;,.. � . _ ._� �, • 9 ''' �:/6 `y , . ..� � Q_. _. ��_ ,. , j ��T�::� 1F " ' i �s .� � ,,.�y . � .� �•� �, /O —T— � .l :.! r-. . c�'j Mi :- RESOLUTION N0. � � A RESOLUTICN ORD�RING PR�LIbtIr.4RY PLANS, SPEC.IFT.CATIONS, AND �STIMATES Or THL'• COSTS Tt{EREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1978-1, ADDENDUM #6 � BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley as follows: 1. That it appears in the interests o£ the City and of the property owners affected that there be constructed certain improvements, to-wit: Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer system, water and sa�itary sewer services and othe� facilities located as follows: Alley:. From 59th Averiue to 60th Avenue Between Main Street and 2nd Street 2. That the Public Works Directox, Richard Sobiech, City Hall, Fridley, I�I, is hereby authorized and directed to dra:a the preliminary plans and speciii- cations and to tabulate the results of his estimates of the costs of ' said improvements, including every item of cost from incepti�n to cor�pletion and all fees and expenses incurred (or to be incurred) in c�nnection there- with, or the financing thereof, and to make a preliminary report of his findings, stating therein whether said i:nprovements are feasibie and whether they can best be made as proposed, or in connection with some other improvements (and the estimated cost as r°commended), including also a description of the lands or area as inay receive benerits therefrom and as may be proposed•to be assessed. 3. Th at said �reli minary report of the Engineer sr.all be furnished to the � City Council. .ADOF'TED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DA:' OF � , 19 7 8. ATTEST: CI1'Y GLERK - tAA1tVIN C. BRUi�Si:LL A9/1YOR - W i 1 i i am J, Nee 10 C RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTI�N RECEIVING TlfE PR�LIP>II�iARY REPORT AND CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE hfATTER OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF GERTAIN IhIPROVEMENTS: STREET IMRPOVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1978-1,. AODENDUM #6 � WHEREAS, the construction of certai.n improvements is deemed to be in the interest of the City of Fridley and the property owners affected thereby. BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley, as follows: 1. That the preliminary report submitted by the City Engineer and the Consulting Engineers is hereby received and accepted. 2• That the City Clexk shall act to ascertain the name and address of the owner of each parcel of land directly affected ox within the area of lands as may be proposed to be assessed for said improvements, and calculate estimates of assessments as may be prop�sed relative' thereto against each of said lands. - 3. That the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and ear.h of them as noted in s aid notice are all the lands and areas as noted in said notice: A1� af the same to be assessed proportionately accarding to the benefits received. � 4. That the estimates of assessments of the Clerk shall be available for inspection to the o,4ner o£ any par.cel a£ land as may be affected thereby at any public hearing held relative thereto, as well as at any prior time reasonable and convenient. 5. That the City Gierk is authorized and directed to give notice of such public hearing by publishing a notice thereof in the official news- paper of. the City =vf Fridley and by mailed notices to all the property owners whose pxopexty is liable to be assessed with the making of these improvements according to law, such r_otice to be substantially in form and substance of the noti_ce attached hereto as E�ihit "A". ' 6. That this Council will meet on the 25th day of Sept. 197 g at 7:30 o'clock.P,h1. at the City Hall in the City of Fridley for�the purpose of holding a public hearing on the improvement noted in the notice attached hexeto and made a part thereof by reference, Exhibit nA�� ADOPTED BY T� CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDI.EY TEiIS DAY OF , 197$. ATTEST: CITY CLERK - biARVIA� C. BRUNSELL MAYOR - ��AM J, NEE 10 D � OFFICIAL PUBLICATION CITY OF FRIDLEY (EXHIBIT A) NOTICE OF HEARING OI3 IMPROVE1�tENTS S'iREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 197$-t, ADD�l. !/6 . � l0 �' WHEREAS, the City Council of th e City of Friclley, Anoka County, Ntinnesota, has deemed it expedient to receive evidence perCaining to the improvement� hereinafter described. NOiV, THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEItEBY GIVEN THAT on the z�th day of 1978 at 7:30 o'clock P.M. the City Council will meet at the C ty� Hall in�said City, and will at said time and place hear all parties interested in said improvements in whole or in part. ` The general nature of the improvements is the construction.(in the lands and streets noted below) of the follo�sing improvements, to-wi:t: CONSTRUCTION ITEM ' - Sfireet improvemer+ts, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services and other facilities located as follows: � . Alley: From 59th Avenue to o0th Avenue Between Main Street and 2rtd Street ESTIb4ATED COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . � 4 � 355. 00 Tf-tAT THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE A5SESSED FOR SAID IbiPR�VEMENT5 IS AS FOLLONS: Fox Construction Item above ----------------------------------------- All of the land abut�ing upon said streets named abave and all lands within, adjacent and abutting thereto. All of said land ta be assessed proportiana:ely according to the be;�eiits received by such �improvement. That should ttte Council proceed with said improvements they wi12 consider each separate improvements,.except as nereafter. otherwise provicied by the Cauncil all under the foll�wing authority, to-wit: Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chapter 429 and laws amendatory thereof, and in conformity with the City Charter. DATED THIS >>th DAY OF Sept. � 197$ i BY ORDElC OF THE CITY COUNCIL. Publish: September 13, 1978 September 20, 1978 , AiAYO R- W� � � i am J. Nee � 0 0 RESOLUTION N0. 0 A RESOLUTION ORDERING PRELTMINARY PLANS, SPECZFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES OF T}IE COSTS THEREQF: $TREET IMPROVEMENT PROJEC7 ST. ig79-1, S7REET IMPROVEMENT PROJEC7 ST. 1979"Z EMSAS) AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1979-4 (CSAH) BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley as follows: 1. That it appears in the interests of the City and of the property flwners affected that there be constructed certain impxovements, to-wit: Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer services and otF�er facilities located as follows: � St. 1979-1 Capitol Street 66th Avenue 70th Way Locke Lake Road Hickory Street 63� Way 63rd Way 61� Way 61st Way Ashton Rvenue Channel Road st. 1979-2 61st Avenue Main Street St. 1979-4 Osborne Road 0 Main Street to �iughes Avenue ' _ Central Avenue to Rice Creek School East River Road to Hickory Drive East River Road to Hickory Street Locke Lake Road to 69th Way East River Road East to Ashton Avenue East River Road East to Ashton Avenue East River Road East to Ashton Avenue East River Road East to Ashton Avenue 64th Way to 61st Way 68th Avenue to 360' North 4th Street t� 7th Street Osborne Road to 77th Avenue Central Avenue to Stinson Bouleuard � ll Resolution No. -2' Ord. Prel. Plans �-Specs. . St. 1979-1, 2 � 4 � 2. That the Public Warks Director, Richard Sobiech, City Ha7.1, Fxidley, NM, is hereby authoxized and directed to draw the preliminary p�ans and specifi- cations and to tabulate the results of his estimat.es of the costs of sa.id improvements, including every item of cost from inception to completion and all fees and expenses incurred (or to be incurred)• in connection there- with, ox the financina thereo£, and to make a prelisninary report of his findings, stating therein ►ahether said improvements are feasible and whether they can best be made as proposed, or in connection.with some other improvements (and the estimated cost as recommended), includa�ng also a description of the lands or area as may receive benefits therefrom and as may be proposed to be assessed. 3. That said prelir,unary report of the Engineer shall be furnished to the - City Council. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY T}iIS DAY OF , 13 7 8. ATTEST: ' CYTY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL 0 MAYQR -�4J i 1 1 � am J. Nee 0 11a ' . . ..�':�'.." RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION REQUESTING STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO TURN BACK TO CITY OF FRIDLEY JURISDICTION CERTAIN HIGHWAY FRONTAGE ROADS WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) acquired jurisdiction over certain frontage roads within the City of Fridley to facilitate interstate and trunk highway construction; and WHEREAS, these frontage roads are practically an integral part of the City of Fridley.street system and have been routinely maintained by the City; and WHEREAS, it would be to the health, safety and welfare oi the citizens of the City of Fridley if the f_rontage roads were under the jurisdiction of the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS, the addition of the frontage roads to the City of•Fridley street system could allow additional designation of Municipal State Aid Routes (MSA) and permit the City to receive an increase in its MSA allotment. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby requests the MnDOT to turn back ior jurisdiction by the City of Fridley the fronLage roads described on attached �xhibit A. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCII.� OF �HE CITY OF �RII7L�Y THI5 DAY OF , 1978. 0 ATTEST: City Clerk - Marvin C. Brunsell Mayor - �nlilliam J. Nee � � .. l2 A EXH]:P,IT A C.S. 02Q5 (T.ii. 47=15F} „ ,i C.S. 0207 (T.H. 65=5) � C.S. 0285 (T.H. G94=3�3) Frontage Road Turnback Request The City o£ Fridley SheeL- 1 of 2 Sheets C.S. 0205 (T.H. 47=156) East Frontage Roads and C.S. 0285 (T.H. 6S4=394) Interchange T.H. 47 and T.H. 694 Fr.�ntage Roads: 1. 53xd Avenue North ta termini Ivorth, 0.15 miles. �. �+i:h Street hortheast to Sth St:eet NortheasC, 0. 03 m�iles . 3. 57th Avenue NortheasC to 7th Street Northeas� (N. of TH 69�+) 0.37 miles 4 57'� Avenue va�theast *_o ;iissyssipp�. Street ho:.ti�east, 0.$7 mil.°s. 5. 66th Avet�Le ?�:ortheast ?'.0 67ttt flrenue �Ior:he�st, O.QB r.�iles. (�. Approximately 76�h avenua N�r.tti�ast to Csborne Driv4 �or�heast, O.QS ^�3es. �.S. 02C� (T.:i. 47=156) k'esr FrontaF;e Roa3s: 7. Star Lar_e tio A' ce Greek '!'`--racz, 0.59 II7.�.E?s. �. Rice Creek ��n�e�ard to fi9:.h r:.vena° Nort:�eas::, ?.Q� railes. C.B. 0207 (T.H. 65=5} k�e�t �r�ata�e R�a.s: m..: � ..�_Ir. T?;e��r��, 0.09 �:�l�s. g• J£'.Y.Y1.CC? �li�Z3Tii2 i.G i��i riJ.2'x �)4.hv4 �.p, Mi�sissi�pi �treet to 6; th Avertue Norttiea.st, 0.19 miles. C.S. p2pT (T.H. 65=5) and C.S. 0?85 (T•H• bg4=�9�+� �ritierchan�e: 11. 53rd Aven:►e Nort:�east to Fi.11more.Nort;�ea�t (S..of T.�i. 6y4), 0.36 miZes. 22. rfatterhorne Driti*e to i:athac�ay Lane Northeast (tior4n oz T.H. 634) on Hillw3.nd Road, 0.67 miles. 0 �^� w;.��s.!�h'. ^ ..=': ., _ _ : 4 �• �'� ,� x �i QY�_..t � __._? �/1. _w k4C 4h:.._ K � / ✓' 1 . � !� • �-�CJ , �l _o Y -- �; �' \ Z � � � ��E �'� CQ�� i '0 Y� i ail TALNAV�r-�; � tn. n � .,�` lOGxti �z�� PRh`! �� ?4 � �Ji � C�I; n i y J �, � W �. . � . 4v:k 1 � _� }i 1 C `..._�.:;� � � �� I t �' �`ti �;..s„��, , � A �-- ��1j �� CUf1 {i � 11 'i ��:`.4„__ _ ; I { �1 ��' �`ti�d '� t� , � ti �,�s✓� �i i �'�� , R ,,'� �Li�� 9 + �! r � ��%� y x; - � r c �I Q - < *_��` �:; � � �; C�I :n� . : �� w�._�1�'� �� ;� ,. �I! ifj 1 � ; ��. ; � � �� i �I + ';�� ,�:4;; 4 . �► �`��( � �'�ii � I! _,, <_':'t!, �;1;' '� • . �.~. --LJI•- � I� � 7'',i ��` � I � � `" N i � M � �� { vi i}j 1� t � J � \ ' �-. � � //''�i `��h bSJ_"'� �1 y•n l..�'-X, � ? l—a.',� `EN; ,`.� ��:' �'` �. 1{I?�`�:`, . .�ti R �`��1\1 . :.--�!j �.. ,,�tQ._Jl__ �C .__..;-- �--, � �x �,,,� . �, L�JIJI_ . {�r5 �r AvE. l � ;i4 � n_.eYF �r�! u s.i� s z, � �r NE � N.E. _ ,o . 3J � �� ,� �jI 65 (I� � �.�� ;� �-� =w#:� i4NE LJ�JI�I_�1��._I�I. HL'� s., _ J�� y'_ �( Yp°i�-�-- �^�S{ � 1�'''-- ��.� , � r ..� ....__ 1!''�---,. . W O�R Qii. T�t !H _'. � � N � y� � ^ �I I I fY � 1( . _. _� C` Z a � "-nQ . � `I � �� 2 {,f `�'��n �� . L V_ �) �Y ,�.A ._._�.. L?6 t n avE rt E. �� o R� l�J t�] 7J m_ .�_ � y� _� � , � �� 761A �1 AVE �� G' �(12,ii N ai v� � zj a � �`' � Trai(er � '� �i nve �:��;�� V 9%=- � CoWt j� -'�H,��51n ��_. — ��iPr�vate)._7�UI_FIRESIDE OR. i z W�:. � �- r--=--�____. % 9�—� z ' } Traiter Courl �v a� o� x ��z �, �otiC,h�nGO�� ST. z � o a � (Pr�v�te) � ^ Y►„ m w�� 1 �, i z1 <+zd> Lp a�� L�� '� �c� i 4�� TS i/? evi NE � y '' fv.� 13 r d L'' I ��_I �J��t.� � A�� yE,_ 1�� Z� N. E _�::J � - _—_1 f— _1 ��':i IF_.r.__".______' �'—_` _ . R�� EY.�iIBIT nAri C.S. 0207 (T.H. 65=5)�, C.S. 0285 (T.H. 69��393) Frontage Road Turnback Request City ofi Fridley Sheet 2 of 2 � G5th AVE. }'� �REEK � r f��7 `"— \ = � l �� _� �_ � it �i/ { co �� v�'' N.E� �/ rl( �E' �ANDORA � �; , ��. } � IX ��I'�� 4• j co j v> �, �.� aa�n�.,.�vf_ hE.�a WII. J` �� , ��.._l� ��.a '1�,�Ear�l,AVf.IJ.c.t. � �la J v_� ��,; ��''�� ov� Rrown �:` o �. r� � "- _ � �� N�..LJ.—`—===—�la�� t��l��;i c_r,ayZ�(� ;,, �� i / Sc� y� E. � �K`^!�_aS7\y A� x+.� f'. .�_.��;., j ll ,�. , �, � ``�,��!{ :� E�,� �,��ti � �?" �i:.r; L�;, � �� CrPeh =°j��/� �i ��i z 1�� _'ta ��z ri��il: �{ �� ^� ^�f ! i; G� � ?f�� `,!✓ °�; �n a��=.� , i� c,! � ,( �--- r!� �ols7�n r�IAVg. f!N�EI'. r��-'y 1 N O�f`' 4p ¢� �f{; �� _�' ;j e6fn e.VE_N.E 1 �_ �—�� a � r- GaJ tn ��CICYE� , ar i� � . vy�-_,_,( ii—'__..._ iSir � .JiJ�N_..r_-. � r l Ir—�� "' �i a � , r �., ;{,;e•, IO W�� t�, };, � : ,, "1' {;�� '—t�� Y'! � ��'� ��i wli {��J Vl$Si551i�F1 �� 1��_,�1` y�j� p�� i�il .�I1� n.) ��l� gT _ � �__._ �` �_ _. �.a�. L _ µ,.__._�.i =-_�_.�_ ��._,4r_ i �f �� 7. i� �-'� ,t• . � �'^ �� . .� __ � c R.7:;rETT� �N �,, �---,--o � �.�� I_=-=-, ;� -;��.,:, �{ �< <�; ,?;_��i�; °�`' �,f �%I� o4rr .� ( <?I� f z�l W i YILJ �h � i _,`�.��:�'{, � ° ' I��sn a�rE. t_. `_�' .��!f � L�; `ni4 �'�� ii s� ,--�i �''�_ �L�lj�� 0 4)� �� - '_"- C\�E. k.��:.. � z � �� il �� j�Y I--~ ! 1 i � �ir � 4 � ' C�1 Z ?I� � i1� t �� S 7.,^ 1� zit_Y�' ,_!� `� � � °'!=�� 11� �� Mi� �li�t{�� i"� �' � (, � >R h E � � � l_.� �_=� •_�i, l�i{Iq n t 4i� J`�. �., RiLr 1 �� ,~ � � � NI ��59th O �YF�� tJ`�E,,�� Z:� w. � ��1�� _!' � ! � 3, . � L.=� L ��.L` �A._.,/i � � � S P� � �. :' �f!Lr`.7..--.' ir.� ..F i '�� L�71 �.� � �'it r �a � �- 4 -.----.�`\�� r1l`�':-� � ;�. ti- �' i o�'' �, ;� , � � �,; :-1 ,a,� • �v �,F_,;�� .� r. - i _ �� . ,.< 1� t\ . 1 c. (4 ��, �„ - �h 1�,�; �' I ._jL«!�_l�t - qf _..�li. _� y. _.i (.� �'.._. _._ .._ _ _ _ .�� _ _ �i' i�'i � �J�j N�� 56� +i � iLJ�'^, n� �;��;: � �� Q� 4 � , y •7 � i � 'Zf K� C7' d1. ��e E L: 12 � „ �t\� �- ] ; �;.r. L, c:=.s.� �i 1 i ) ---, f :`r_J� :3R �. �,x.__ - NCO ��- E�F,� j`C'� 1i 6R!A.°.��DAL�J� � ? ��R��I � �� { �- � �� i L�IiL�� L � � �a;�ca�E� ( I l •'. i �'—.—� m w � CE vi in �R.in�`kEGiS��°��` � ;;1 S.wAI.LE. - i t �-' c RQ��: CR. "-.�"' — _"" � C' r--. � �h v� ------ 6. 3 G r t; � ; �_____- _ V y ' - - _."' '.5 � : � �� 5�� w�,�;p7�_' ; _�� 7 N. B�ti O � � r-- `' / �� ` � i' B.N.Ou� � ac� �I �il vi�nil '(�4� Q0 e,--I'�.�t�a��'c(� 9.5 0�. ��`w�,,,. JLL��`QLs�a'Ls:;��{aii�.'� �.li.:' � �acn ,. _.1 � t •Nth'1fht.RE` � t0- E. u � '0^ - _� —c�� ;�✓`/ C!W �! ��- 11 :AEtS' ��.` �.i - y � � 2 N:rit�E.MF.t:E1-'�( � ` � � � � �;y� �� CtH.. ��tl: = _----_-_ �, �<.�,.. ��.c.. *.WWDEMfAE t .— � --=-�'� i�— 9? �d� :.�a e. � � 5'C �.�r��p � � ' LA N _ =;It _ _ • f'EFI.�E GtR W p�vrx�n{��:'�;� .� �.�;`r.e:�`�� f ., y- _ � �� _. 1 ` �' H .:� --� ��.1. N s�<<�� Wlt . � ��` �',� .. _,.\ wN�FMfkt�• f R�j•N� � ��'1� I � r �,. =1 . � � l�. �,;,a , �.. :,; � u,�:�w'�:.�it� ''' RESOLUTION N0. 1978 : 13 A RESOLUTION AU1'HORIZING TRANSFERS FROM THE PUBLIC U7ILITY FUND AND THE REVOLVING FUNQ TO W-75 WATER 410RKS IP4PROVEMENT BOND FUt�D, WATER REFUNDING BONDS OF 1975 FUND, IMPROVEI�ENT BONDS OF 1963 FUND, ANQ SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS REFUNDING BONDS 0� 1964 WHEREAS, Tax levies have been adopted and filed with the County, or transfers into bond fur.ds are necessary to provide the reguired amount af money in certain improvement bond funds, � NOW, THEREFORL-, BE TT RESOLVED, By the City Council of the City of Fridley, me�ting at a regular session on the llth day of September as follows: 1. That a transfer Water Refunding the purpose of collectible in from the Public Utility Operating Fund to the Bond Fund W-75 in the amount of $40,2�2 for eliminating the tax levy for the year 1978, the year 1979, is authorized. 2. That a transfer from the Publ:c Utility Operating Fund to the tJater Refunding Bonds of 1975 Fund in the amount of $54,160 for the purpose of eliminating the tax levy for the y�ar 1978, collectible in the year 1979, is authorized. 3. That a trar�sfer from the Public Utility Fund Bonds of 1963 Fund in �:he amount of $868 for eliminating the tax levy for the year 1978y the year 1979, is authorized. to �he Improvement the purpose of collectible �n 4. That a transfer from the Public Utility Fund to the Refunding. Bonds of 1964 in the amount of $1�2,088 for the purpose of eliminating the tax levy for the yzar 197$, collectible in the year 1979, is authorized. . 5. That a transfer of the 1978 collections from Service Connections by the Special Assessment Revolving Fund (80} ta t��e Refunding .. Bonds of 1964 for the purpase of eliminatirag the tax levy ' for the year 1978, coliectible in 1979, is authorized, i PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COtffVCIL OF 7HE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1978. ATTEST: - RVIN C. BRUNSELL MAYOR - WILLIAM J. (vEE PURPOSE FOR MEETING DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPR011EMENT FUNDS FOR THE YEAR 1.979 . TO BE TRANS- AVAILABLE FROM FERRED FROM � SERVICE CONNEC- PUBLIC UTILITY FUND REQUIREMENTS TIONS IN�1978 FUND . TAX LEVY W-75 (Water Refunding} Water Refunding Bonds of 1975 Sonds of 1g63 � Refunding Bonds of 1964 0 � 40,202 54,160 868 48,83Q $I44,�60 $ 36,742 $36,742 To be paid by Utility Fund To be �aid by Service Cannections i. . c $ 40,202 Not . Scheduled 54,160 • 858 ��yV� ' $107,318 $i07,318 36,742 $144,060 . 13A � ,. _ 13 � CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDUM DATE: SEPTEMBEl2 8, 1978 T0: NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAG�R, AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASS'T. CITY MGR./FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: TRANSFERS FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITY FUND AND THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVOLVING FUND (80) TO VARIOUS BOND FUNDS The attached resolution makes the required transfers from the Public Utility Fund and the Special Assessment Revolving Fund to the , - . various bond funds for the purpose of ineeting debt service requirements for the year i979. This resolution has been prepared in the same manner as resolutions in pas� years. " The second resolution authorizes the transfer of $30,000 from the Regular Special Assessment Fund to the Capi�al Improvement Fund. This is similar to the transfer made in 1977, and to the way the 1979 budge� has been prepared. These resolutions have been prepared in accordance with past discussions with the Ciiy Council relat-ing to ihese items. �• . � �. . Attachments MB/et 0 RESOLUTION N0. 1978 A RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM TNE REGULAR SPECIAL ASSESSM�NT FUND 70 THE CAPITAL IMPRO��EMENT FUND WHEREAS, A surplus exists in the Regular SQecial . -� Assessment Fund; and, WHEREAS, It is the desire of the City to provide funds in the Capital Improvement Fund to meet future capital improvement needs of the City, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the Counci1 of the City of Fridley that a transfer of $30,000 be made from the Regular Special ASSessment Fund to the Capital Improvement �� Fund. � PASSED AND ADO?TED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TNE CITY QF FRIDLEY THIS 11TH OAY OF SEPTEf�BER, 1978. i A'fTEST : . MAYOR - WILLIAM J. t1EE CITY �LERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL �� RESOLUTIOPJ N0: - 1978 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1978) BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: � 1. It is hereby deterr�ined that the assessable cost with respect to the following named improvement, to-wit: TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF 1'REES (1978) including all incidental expcnses thereto, is estimated at $6,375.15 , . 2. The City Clerk shall forthwith calcula�e the proper � amounts to be specia1ly assessed for said improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land benefited by said improvement accor�ding to law. PASSED AND ADOPTED SY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIQLEY THIS DAY 0�' � , 1978, MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE� ATTEST: CITY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell 15 .� MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MAP�AGER, �ND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRU�SELL, ASST. CI7Y MGR/FIN. DIR. SUBJECT: ASSESSMENT ROLL - TREATPIENT AND REP90VAL 0� TREES (1978) DATE: SEPTEMBER 5, 1978 The attached resolutions are for the purpose of erdering preparation of the assessment roll, and the publication of the notice of hearing for Treatment and Removal of Trees {1978). The ro13 includes work done in the latter part of 1977 and the work done in 1978. 15 A 0 RESOLUTION td0. - 1978 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING PUBLICATION 0� HEP.RItdG OTJ THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE TREATt�1ENT AP�D REMOVAL OF TREES (1978) BE IT RESOLVED by the Councii of the City of �rid7ey, Anoka Caunty, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Counci? shall meet at the City Hall in the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota on the 18th day of Se tember , 1978, at 7:30 p.m, to pass upon the propose assessment for the followi.ng �amed improvement: TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1978) � 2. The City Clerk shall�publish not�ces of the time and place of ineeting in the o�ficial newspaper of the City at least two (2) weeks prior to such meeting. ' PASSES AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUP�CIL O� THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY 4F , 1978 ATTEST: CTTY CLERK - Marvin C. Brunsell � M1�YOR - WILLIANf J, r�EE 16 �� i , i � CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKII COUNTY, HINNESOTA HO7TCE OF HEARTt�G OF ASSESSt4ENT FOR TREATMENT AND REM�VAL OF TREES (1978) 16 � Fiotice is hereb,y �ivcn that the Councii or the City of Fridley �vill meet at the City Hall in said City on the 18th day of September, 1978 at 7:30 o'clack P.t�l„ to hear and pass upon a11 objections, if any, Lo the proposed assessments in respect to the following improveinent, to-:•rit: TREATt4ENT AND REhiOVAL OF 7REES (1978} 7he proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvemer�ts. � The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the treatment or re►�oval of trees located in the City of fridley. Lots 4 an� 46 Lots 5 & 6 Lot 17 Lot 12 Lots 12 and 25 Pt Lot 33 Lot 4 Parcel 500 Lot 7 lot 32 Lot 5, Block 3 Lot 4, Block 4 Lot 11, Block 3 Lots 4& 5, Block 3 Lot 2, Block 3 Lots 18-20, 29 & 30, alock 13 l.ot 6, alock 1 Pt kot 14 & 15, Block 2 Lot 7, Block 3 Outlot A Lot 15, Block 2 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 7, 61ock 3 Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 1 Parcel 1017 Lot 15, 61ock 7 Lofi 9, Bloc{; 13 Lot 4, Block 4 Lots 21-26, Qiock A Lots 38-40, Block Q Lots 44-46, Block S Lot 1, elock 1 Lot 2, 81oCk 1 Lots 13-16, Block 8 Auditor's Sub. #21 Auditor's Sub. �22 Auditor's Sub. �22 Auditor's Sub. �23 Auditor's Sub. �f23 Auditor's Sub. #23 Auditor's Sub. #�89 Auditor's Sub. $89 Auditor's Sub. #92 Auditor's Sub. #92 Bourdeaux's Spring Brook Brookview Terrace 3rd Christie � City Vievr Harris Lake Estates Hyde Park Innsbruck 5th Innsbruck 5th InnsbrucE: North 2nd Innsbruck horth Townhouses 2nd Meado�vl ands' tlelody Manor Melody Pdanor Moore Lake Highlands 3rd Moare Lak� Park lst Oak �rove Pearson's Craig�•ray Estates 2nd Ptymouth Rice Cree�c Estates 2nd Riverview Heights ftiverview lieir,hts Riverview Heights Sakariason Sakariason Spring araak Park . the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said imE�rovements or each of them and is the same as those listed above. � Satd improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above ntoice areas. A property o�vner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of ' appeal upon the City �layor or Clerk within twenty (20) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice �vith the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the htayor or Clerk. � . AT7EST: IERK - arv�n C. runse - I I/1M . EE Please publish in tnc Fridley Svn on August 30th and September 6, 1978 RESOLUTION N0. 1978 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE 5ALE OF CERTAIN.5URPLUS PRO�ERTY WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has items that are no longer suitab1e and useabl� for public purposes and surplus to the � needs of the City; and WHEREAS, the foliowing items should be disposed of at the best available price obtainable for their salvage value; 1-�Ellioti addressograph, modei 2200 plus address plate card stand. 1- Rite line copy holder 2 - Victor adding machines 1 - Homlite chain saw 2 - Lawnmowers 1 - Trafficoder w/counter cable 1 - Harger Drunkometer kit 1 - Dictacord machir,e 3- Old style hand held portable radio Other miscellaneous items NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESDLVED, that thE City Council authorizes the City Manager to proceed with thQ disposal of the above items. PASSED AND AUOPTED 8Y THE CITY• COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TN�S DAY OF ATTEST: CI7Y CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL P�fAYOR - WILLIAM NEE 17 � RESOLtlTION id0. 1978 A RESOLUTION APPP,OVING AND AJTHaRIZIiVG SIGr1ING THE AGREEMFNT ESTABLISHING WORKING CO��DITIONS, WAGES AND HOURS CF EMPLOYEES 4F THE CI7Y OF FRIDLEY POLTCE DEPARTMENT FOR THE YEAR 197$ (PATROLMEN) WHEREAS, Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement EmpToyees tfnion Local No. 320, as bargaining representative of the Patr�lmen of the City of Fridley Police Department, has presented to the Council of the City of Fridley various requests relating to the working conditions, wages and hours of er�ployees of the Police Department of the City of Fridley, and � WNERL-AS, The �7ty af Fridley has presented various requests to the Union and to the employees rela�ing to working conditions, wages and hours of employees of the Palice Department of the City of Fridley, and WHEREAS, Representatives af tne Union and the City have met and negotiate� re�arding the requests af the Union and the Ci�y, and WHEREAS, Agreement has now been reached bet�2en representatives of the two parties on the praposed changes in the existing contract between the City and the Union. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RCSOL�ED, By the City Council that the Mayor and the City Nfanager are hereby authorized to execute the attached Agreement (Exhibit °A"} relatinq to working conditions, wages and hours of Patrolmen of the City of Fridley Police Dep��tment. PASSED ANQ ADOPTED SY THE CITY COUNCIL QF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY r�zs aaY o� ., �g�s. MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE ATTEST: CIYY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL . � .. ,,,;: •�. CI7Y OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDUM T0: NASIM M. QURE5HI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, ASST. CITY MGR./FIN. QIR. SUBJECT: CONTRACT WITH LOCAL NQ. 320 (POLICE OFFICERS f=OR THE Y�AR 1978) DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1978 The attached contract sets forth wages, hours and working conditions for Police Officers for the year 1978. 7he main portion, and Appendix "A" of the agreefnent were negotiated on an area wide basis by the Metropolitan Area Managers' Association Negotiating Committee, and were the subjsct of an arbitration award. Attached and made a part of the agreement as Apnendix "B" are the iocal conditions. There were no changes in tti�orking conditions negotiated at the local 1eve1 for the year 1978. The basic master contract provides for a basic wane i�crease of 8.7q. Shere is a significant chan�e in lon�evity �nd college incentive pay compared to the old contract. The old contract provided for longevity pay that ranged form $25 to $75 per month. The old contract provided for the payment of $.50 per quarter credit hour up to a maximum of $90 per month as coliege incentive pay. The new contract calls for longevity pay or college pay ranging from three percent to nine percent of base salary. The maximum extra pay possible under the new system for a person with sixteen years of service, or 180 approved credits, is $136.80 per month. The City will contribute $75 per month to�rrards hospitalization insurance.in 19i8 versus $65 per month during 1977. ' . I should point out that the new contract is much more stringent in the area of which college caurses the City will pay for, Most of the employees will probably use the longevity track rather than the educational track. The percentage increase for individual officers varies, and depends on how they fit into the new contract in the area of extra pay. The increased cost to the employer, taking everything into consideration ranges from 8% to 10.5%. � MCB:sh 18A IND�X � ..__ _. - . _ . P�c _ 18 ARTICLE 1— PURPOSE OF AGRECP4EP�T_______________..____------------_____—..------_.._ � AftTICLE II — RECOGNITION---------------.._____________---....__-------..____----____ 2 �IRI�ICLE TII — DEFINITION_________________.._---..-----..__---------------___—..----- 2 ARTICLE IV — EMPLOYER SECURI7Y---________ --------------------------------------- 3 ARTICLE V— EMPLOYER AUTNORITY-----____..--------------------------=------------- e� ARTICLE VI — UNION SECURITY---__..----------------------------------------------- 4 ARTICLE VII — EMPLOYEE RIGHTS — GRIEVANCE PROCEDIlRE-----------_..________________ 5--.� . ` __--------..--_______..________________ 10 ARTICLE VITI — SAVINGS CLAUSE-------------- ARTICLE IX — SENIORITY---------------------------------------------------------- 10 ARTICLE X — DISCIPLINE----------------------------------------------------___----- 11 ARTICLE XI — CONSi'ITUTIONAL PRQTEC7ION--------------�---------___________------- �2 ARTICLE XII — WORK SCHEDULES-----------------------------------------=---------- 12 ARTICLE XIII - OVERTIME-------------------------------------.._______----..------- 13 ARTICLE XIV — COURT TIME--____---__�..------____�--------------------------------- 13 ARTICLE XV — CALI BACK 7IME-----------------------------------------------------..14 ARTTCLE XVI — WORKIi�G �UT OF CLASSI�ICATION-------------..__________________----- 14 ARTICLE XVII — INSURANCE----------------------------.._____----------------------- 14 , AR7ICLE XUIII — STANDBY�PAY------------- ---.._____.._____�------------------�----- i4 ARTICLE XIX — UNIFORMS------------------------------------------------..--------- 14 AR1'ICLE XX — INJU2Y OE�i DUTY-------------------------------..________------------- 15 ARTICLE XXI — LOt�GEVITY AhD EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE-------------------------- """ i6 ARTICLE XXII — WAIVER--------------�--------------------------�--_____---------- 18 ARTICLE XXIII — DURA7ION---------------------------------------------___--------- 19 APPENDIX A ARTICLE A-1 — WAGE RATES-------------------------------------------------------- 20 APPENDTX B � ' ARTICLE 6-1 — LEGAL DEFENSE-------------___-------------.------------------�—___ 21 ARTICL� B-2 - LOSS OF SENIQRITY------------------------------------------------- 22 ' ------------------------ 22 ARi'ICLE Q-3 — PROBATI4NARY PERIODS---------------------- � � i : : . x�to�x � � .. 18 C . � PAGE ARTICLE 8-4 — VACTIONS-------�-------___ _..-----.._________________________________ 22 � ----------------------------------------- 23 ARTICLE Q-5 — NOLIDAYS__________________ � -----____..------------------------------ 23 ARTICLE Q-6 — SICK LEAVE----------------- I � ___---------------- 24 ARTICL� 6-7 — FUPd�RAL PAY—_—_�_________________________________ �ARi'ICLE Q—II — JURY PAY----------------e------_�_---___-------______------_____--- 24 ARTICLE Q-9 — SEVERANCE PAY------------------------------------------------------ 24 0 0 0 � , 1 . . . : : . � .. 18 D 0 M115T�R L11I30R 1�GR��MENT �3ETWFEN. AND MINNE50TA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES' UNION, LOCAL NO. 320 ARTICLE I PURPOSE OF AGREE2�iENT , This AGRE�MENT is entered into as of January l, 1978 between the CITY OF FRIDLEY ', hereinafter called the EMPLOYER, and the MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBI.IC �1ND LAW ENFORCEMENT EAiPLOYEES' UNION, LOCAL NO. 320, hereinafter cailed the UNION. It a.s the intent and purpose of this AGREEAZENT to : . l.l Establish procedures for the resolutian of disputes concerning this AGREEMENT'S interpretation and/or application; and 1.2 Plac� in written form the �arties' agreement upon ternzs and conditions of employment for the duration af this AGREEMENT. � -1- ` i � . � � � -'�- ARTICLE II RECOGNSTION 2.], The EMPLOYER recognizes �he UNJON as the exclusive a representative, under Minnesota Sta�utes, Section 179.71, Subdivision 3, for all police personnel in the £ollowing job classifications: 1. Police Officer 18 F 2.2 In the event the EMPLOYER and the UNIOPZ are unable to agree as to �he inclusion or exclusion of a new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the 13ureau of Mediation Services for determination. �. ARTICLE YII D�FINZTXONS . � 3.1 UNION: The tdinnesota Teamsters Public and�.Law Enforcement Employee�' Union, Local No. 320. . 3.2 UNION MEMBER: A member of the Minn?sota Teamsters Public • and Law Enforcement Employees` Union, Local No. �20. 3.3 EMPLOYEE: A member of the exclusively recognzzed 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 bargaining unit. DEPARTMENT : The Fri dl ey Police Department. EMPLOYER : The �j �y � o� FI"l dl ey ' CHIEF: The Chi�f of the Fridley Police Department. UN�ON OFFICER: Officer el.ected or appointed by the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local No. 3.20. • _2_ S �� 3.g TNVESTTGI�TOR/D�TECTIV�: An cmployee specifically assigned or classi�a.ed by the EMPLOYER to tY�e job � classification and/or job position�of INVESTIGATOR/ AETECTIVE. � 3.9 OVERTIME: Work performed at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER in excess of the employee's sc:�eduled shi£t. 3.10 SCiiEDULED SHIFT: A consecutive work period including res� breaks and a lunch break. 3.11 REST BREAKS: Periods during the 5CHEDULED SHIFT during which the employee zemains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties.� 3.12 LUNCH BREAK: A period during t%e SCHEDULED SHIFT durin.g which the employee rcmains on conta-nual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.13 STRIKE: Concerted action in iailirig to report for duty, 18 F the wiZlful absence from one`s position, tize stoppage of work, slow-down, or abstirience in whqle or in part from the full, faithful and proper performance o� the duties of employment for the purposes of inducing, influencing or coercing a change in the cozzditions or compensation or the rignts, privileges or obZigai.ions of employment. ARTICLE IV EMPLOYER SECURITY The UNION agrees that during the life o� this AGREEMENT that the UNION will not cause, encourage, pazticipate in or support any strike, slow-do�m or other interruption of or interference with the normal. functions of the� EMPLOYER. -3- , ARTICLE V EMPLOY�R 11UTFi0RITY 5.1 5.2 18G The EMPLOYER retains the full and unrestricL-ed right to operate and manage�all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and pr_ograms; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology;' to establish and modify the organizational strtzcture; to select, direct, and determine th� number of personnel; to establish work schedules, and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this AGREEMENT. Any term and condition of employment not specifically established ar modified by this AGREEMENT sha].1 reinain solely within the discretion of the EMPLOYER to modify, establish, or eliminate. ARTICLE �7Z UNION Sr:CURITY 0 6.1 The EAiPLOYER shall deduct from the wages of employees who authoYize such a deductian in writing an amount necessary to cover monthl� UNION dues. as. directed by the UNION. �Such monies shall. be remitted 6.2 The UNION may designate employees fr�m the bargaining unit to act as a steward and an alternate and shall infoxm the 6.3 EMLOYER in writing of such choice �nd chanqes in the position of steward and/or alternate. The EMPI,OYER shall. make space available on the employee e bulletin board for posting UNION notice(s) and annou�cement(s)• 6.4 The UNION agrees to�indemnify and hold the EMPLOYER harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders, or judgments brought or issued against the EMPLOYER as a result of any action taken or not taken by the EM�'LOYER under the provisions o£ ti�is Article. ^�� . . ...._... e . �� - : e AT�TICLE VII EMl'LOY�� RIGIi'I'S - GRI�VANCE PROCEDUR� 7.1 DErZNI�TiON OI�' A GRIr:VANCE A gri�vance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or applicatian of the specifa.e terms and conditions of this 1LGPEEMENT. ?.2 TJNION R�PRESENTATIVES � The EMPLOYER will recognize REPRES�:NTATIiT�S designated }3r the UNION as the grievance represeniatives of the bargaining unit having the duiies and responsibilities established by this Article. The UNION shall notify the E11-�PLOYER an wriiing of the names of such Ul�IION RE PRESENTATIVES an� of their successors when so designated as provi.ded by 6. 2 of thi.s AGRE�MENT. 7. 3 PROC�SSIn7G OF A GRIEVANCE �� 18 N It is reco�ized and accepted by the Ui\TION and the E11�l� LpyER that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited � � by i:he job duties and responsibilii:ies of the FMPLOYEES and shall therefore be accomplis�ied durir�g normal wor•king hours only when consisient with such EMPLOYEE duties and responsi3ilities. � The a�grieved EMPLOYEE and a UNIOl\T REPRESENTATIVE shall be allot�ved a reasonable amount of i:ime without Ioss in pay when a� gries►ance is investigated and presented to the EMPL�OYER during normal working hours provided that the EMPLOYEE and the UNION REPRESENTATIVE have notified and received the approval of the desi�iated supervisor who has deiermined that such absence is , . reasonable and would not be detrimental to ihe work programs of the EMI'LOYER. -5- i. 7.4 PROCEDUR� � ,. 18 I Grievances, as defi.ned by Section ?,1, shall be resolved in con- formance wi.th the follorvin� procedure: Step 1. An EMPLOYEE claiming a violation concernin� the ' interpretation or application of this AGR�ET+ifENT shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the EMPLOYEE'S supervisor as designated by the �MPLOYER. The �MPLOY�R-designated representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten {10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not xesolved in Step 1 and appealed to Siep 2 shall be placed in writing setti.ng forth the nature of the gr. ievance, the facts on which ii is based, the proviszon or provisions oi i:he AGRFE�,fIENT allegedly violaied, the remedy requested, and shall be appealed to � Step 2 tiva.thin ten (10) calendar days after the EMPLOXER-designated r , representative's final answer in Step 1. Ariy grievance not appealed in wrifiing to Step 2 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered �vaived. Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UrTION and discussed with the EMPLOY�R-designated SY:ep 2 representative. The EMPLOYER-designated repr�sentative shall � , give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S Step 2 answer in tvriting within ten (IO) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appeal�d to Step 3 within ten (l.U) calendar days following the EMPLOYLR-designated represent- � �. �� . • ative's final Step 2 answer. Any �rievance not appealed 1� � , in wril:ing to Step 3 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall. be consiciered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by fhe UIVION and discussed with the EM:PLOYER-designai;ed Step 3 representative. The EMPLOY�R-designated representative shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S answer in wriiing within ten (10) ealendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within .ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER-designated . representative's final answer i.n Step. 3. Any gr•ievance not appealed � in writing to Step 4 by the L'NION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered titi�aived. Step 4. A grievance unresoJ.ved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 by the UTTION shall be submitted ta arbitration subject � , io the provisions of the Public Employinent Labar Relations Act of 1971. Trie seleciiQn of an arbitraior shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing ihe Arb�itration of Grievaazces" as estabti�hed b�r the Public Employment Relations Board. 7. 5 ARBITRATOR'S AUTHORITY A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the terms and conditions of this AGREEb�NT. Tlie arbitrator shall consider and decide . «7w � � �: � .' . . . 18 tC only the specific issue(s) suUmitted in writing by the LMPLOI�R and the UNION, and shall have no autharity i;o inake a decision on any vther issue not so submitted, B. The arbitrator shall be wii;hout power to make decisians contrary to, or inconsistent tivith, or modifying or varying xn any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or ihe submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both i:he E112PLQYER and the UNTON and shall be based solel.y on the arbitrator's interpretaiion or a�ap�ication of i:he express texi�s of ihis AGREElViENT and to the facts of the grievance presented. � . C. The fees and expenses for ihe arbifrator's services and � proceedings shall be borne equally Uy the �MPLOI'ER and �E1ie UNTON provided that each party shall be responsib2e for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If ei.ther party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, ii may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings the cost shall be shared equally. -8- .� a WAIV�R If a gri.evance i.s not presc�nted within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered "waived. " If a grievance 0 i.s not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or a.�y agreed e�:tension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the EMPLO�YER'S last answer. If the �MPLOi'ER does not answer a grievance or an appeal 1:hereof within the specified time limits, the U1�TION may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to th� next step. The i:ime limit in each step may be extended by mutual wriiten agreement of the EMPLOYER and the UNION in each step. 7. 7 CHOICr OF �{F?12EDY If, as a result of the written EMPLOY�R response in Siep 3, 18� i the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves .. . . the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an exnployee wha has completed the requir. ed probationary period, the grievance may be appealed either io Step' 4 of Article VII or a procedure such as: Civil Service, Veteran's Freference, or Fair Em�loyment. If.appealed to any nrocedure other than Step 4 of Article VII the grievance is not subject io the arbitration procedure as provided � in Step 4 of Article ��II. The aggrieved employee shall indicate in writing �vhich procedure is to be utilized--Step 4 of Article VII or another appeal procedure--and shall sign a statement to the efiect . that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved einployee -9- � . . -10_ � . . , 4 1s r� from making a subsequent appeal through Step 4 of Artic].e VII. � ARTICL� VIII SAVINGS CLAUSE This AGREEMENT is subject to the laws of the United States, the� • State of Minnesota and the City of Fridley . In the event any provision of this AGREEMENT shall be held to be contrary to law. by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken w�thin the time provided, such prova.sions shall be voided. All ather provisions of this AGREEr:ENT shall continue in fu1.l force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the written request of either party. ARTTCLE IX SE�IIORI`i'Y 0 9.1 Sena.ority shall be determined by the employee`s lengtYi of continuous employment wi-ch the Police Department and postnd in an appropriate location. �eniority rost�rs may be ` maintained by the Chief on the basis of time in grade and time within specific classificatians. 9.2 During th� probationary period a newly hired or rehi.red emp�.oyee ma�r be discharged at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. During the p.robationary period a.proinoted or reassigned employee may be replaeed in his previous position at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. 9.3 A reduction of work f orce will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. , ��0� ' � 0 � . Employees shall be recalled from layoff on the basis of seniority. l�n employee on layoff shal]. have an opportunity to re�urn to work within two years of the �ime of his layoff before any new employee is hired. 9.9 Senior employees will be given preference with regard �o • transfer, job classification assignments and promotions .ttg %i when the job-relevant qualifications of employees are equal. 9.5 Senior gualified employees shall be given shift assignment preference after eighteen (18) months of continuous full-time employment. ' � 9.6 One continuous vacatian period sha11 be selected on the basis of seniority until •�,ay lst.of eacix cale�dar year. ARTICLE X DISCIPLINE 10.1 The EriPLOYER will discipline emplayees for just cause only. . Discipline will be in one ar more of the following forms: a) oral reprimand; b} written reprimand; - � c). suspension; • d) demotion; or e} discharge. � i .. . . 10.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be a.n written form. 10.3 Written reprimands, noti.ces of suspension, an3 notices of discharge which are to become part of an employee's . personnel fil.e shall be read and ackno�vledged by signature of the employee. Emp�oyees and the UNION will receive a copy of such reprimands�and/or notices. 10.4 Empl.oyees may examine their own individua� personnel files at reasonable times under �he dire�ct supervision of the EMPL(?YER . .. �» � � -iz� .� 10.5 Dischazqes will be preceded by a five (5) day suspension without pay. ' �10.6 Employees will not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action unless the employee has been given an opportunity to have a UNION representative present at such questioning. � 30.7 Grievances relating to this ARTICLE shall be initiated by the UNION in Step 3 of the grievance procedure unde= Article VSI. • ARTICLE XI CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION Employees shall hava the rights granted to all citizens by the United States and Minnesota State Constitutions. ARTICLE XII j�J�RK SCHEDULES Y?_.1 The noz�-ma]. ��ork year is two thousand and eighty hours � (2,080) to be accounted for by each er��ployee �hrough: a) hours warked on assigned shi.fts; b) hoZidays; c) assigned training; d) authorized leave time. . 12.2 Holidays and authorized leave time is to be calculated on the basis of the actual length of time of the assigned shifts . 12.3 Nothing contained in this or any other Article shall be interpreted to be a guarantee o£ a minimum or maximum number of hours the EMPLOYER may assign employees. -12- -i�- � 18 P ARTICLE XIII OVERTIME � 13.1 Employees will be compensated at one and on�-half (1-1/2) � times the employee's regular base pay rate for hour.s worked in excess of the employee's regularly scheduled _ shift. Changes of shifts do not qualify an employee for overtime under this Article. � 13.2 Overt�me will be distributed as equally as practicable. 13.3 Overtime refused by employees will for record purposes under Article 13.2 be considered as unpaid overtime wvrked. 13.4 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation �overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded or paid twice for the same hours worked. 13.5 Overtime will be calculated to the nearest fifieen (15) minutes. 13.6 Employees have the bbligation ta work overtime �r call backs if requested by the EMPLOYER unless unusual circumstan�es prevent the employee from so wor3cing. ARTICLE XIV COURT TIME . . An employee who is required ta appear in Court during his scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours' pay at�one and ane-hal£ (1-1/2) times the employee's base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for Court appearance does not qualify the employee ior the two (2) hour minimiun. -13-� . i .. , , � _1�9_ ARTICLL XV CALL I3ACK TINiE � • An employee who is called to duty during his scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours' pay at one and one-hal£ (1-1/2) �:imes the employee's base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shif� for duty does not qualify the employee for the two (2) hour minimum. ARTiCLE XVI WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION Employees assigned by the EMPLOYER to assume the fu13. responsibilities and authority of a higher job classiiication shall receive the salary schedule of the higher classification for the duration of the assignnient. - � � : �1� ARTICLE XVII INSURANCE . The �MPLOYER wil'! contribute up to a maximum oi seventy-five dollars ($75.00) per month per employee taward health, life and long-term disability insurance. � " .. , , ARTICLE XVIII STI�NDBY PAY � . Employees required by the EMPLOYER ta standby shall be paid for such standby time at the rate of one hour.s' pay for �3ch hour on standby. ARTICLE XIX � UNIFOR�iS The EMPLOYER shall provide required uniform and equipment.items. -14- . � —�5— . a AI2TICLE XX INJURY OI� DUTY Emp].oyees injuLed duri.ng the performance of their duties for. the EMPLOYER and thereby rendered unable to work for the . EMPLOYER wil� be paid the difference between the emplayee's' regular pay and Worker's Compensation insurance payments ior a per�od not to exceed ninety (9�) working days per injury, � not charged to the employee's vacat�.on, sick leave or other ac�umulated paid benefits, after a five (5) working day initial waiting period per injury. The five (5) working day waiting . period shall be charged to the emp]_oyee's sick leave account ' less Worker's Compensation insurance payments. ' 0 � ��' � . � • � � . , . lb h►RTICLE XXS LONGEVITY ANU EDUC�TIONAL INCrNTIVE ` 1g S �ffective July 1, 1978 the following terms and conditions are � effective: � 21.1 A�ter four (4) years of continuous employment each employee shall choose to be paid three percent (3�) of the emplayee's base rate or supplementary pay based on educational credits as outlined iia 21.6 of thxs ARTICLE. 21.2 After eight (8) years of continuous employment each "' employee shall choose to be paid supplementary pay of five percent (5�) of the employee's base rate or supplementary pay based on educational credits as out�ined in 21.6 of this Article. •_. � 21.3 After twelve (12) years of continuous em�loyment each employee shall choose to be paid supp�ementary pay of seven percent (70} of the employee`s base rate or supplementary�pay based on e3ucational credits as outlined in Z1.6 of this Article. , 21.4 After sixteen (16) years of continut�us emplcyment each employee shall choose to b� paid supplemantary pay of nine percent (90) of the employee's base rate or supplementary pay based on educatxonal credits as outli:�ed in 23• 6 of ti�is Article. 21.5 Employees may choose supplementary pay either for length of service or for educational credits no more often than once every twelve (12) months. -i6- S . � , 13T ' 21.6 Supplementary pay based on educational credits wil]. be paid to employees after twelve (12) manths of • continuous employment at the rate ot: • • Education Credits stated in Percentage Pay terms of colZege quarter credits increment 45 - 89 • 3� � 90 - 134 135 - 179 180 or more 5$ 7$ 9� Not all courses are to be eligible for credit. Courses receiving qualifying credits must be job related. (Thus, a 4 year degree is not automatically 180 credits -- or a 2 year certi�icate is not automatically 90 credits.) Job- .related courses plus those formal.ly required to enter such courses shall be counted. If Principles of Psychology (8 credits) is required before taking Psychology of Police , i Work (3 credits), completion of these courses would yield. � a total of 11 qualifying credits.. C.E.U..'s (Continuing Education i7ni�ts) in job-related semi_nars, shcrt courses, institutes, etc. shall also be coun�ed. The EMPLOYER shall determine which cotirses are job re�.ated. Disputes are grievable based on the criteria outlined in the award of Minnesota Bureau of Aiediation Services Case No. 78-PN-370-A. � -17- -18- 0 m ��rzcLL xxxr. WAIV�R 22.1 Any and all prior a�reemcnts, resoluti.ons, practices, poli�ies, rules and regulations regarding terms and conuitions of e;tnployment, to the eatent inconsistent u�ith the provisions of ihis AGRE�MENT, axe hereby superceded. ' 22.2 The parties mutually acknowledge ihat during the ne�oitations whic�h resulted in this AGREEMETdT, each had the unlimited rigY�t and o�portunity to make demands and proposals wifh respect to any term or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All agreements and understandings arri.ved at by the parties are se-i forth in .writing iri this AGFi�ER2ENT for the stipulated duraiion of this AGREEMENT. The EMPLOYER and the UNION each valuntariiy and unqualifiedly .. waiues the right to meei and negotiate regarding any and all terms � I$ � ' and conditions of employment referred to ar covered in this , Au�ZEEMENT ar with respect to any i:erm or condition of ' employxnent not specificaily reierred to or covered by this AGREEI��NT, even though such terms or con�itions. may not hav� been within the knowledge or coniemplation of either or both of the parties at the time this contract was negoiiated or exe+cuied. -18-. " ' � ` �x9- . � 18 , ' . V ARTICLE XY.I;II DURI�TION Thi.s AGREEMEriT sha],1 be ef fective as vf January 1, 1978 ; except as herein noted, and shall remain in full force and effect until the thirty-first day of December, 1978. In witness whereof, the � parties hereto:have executed this AGREEMENT on this 7th� - day of SeptE�mber . 1978. . FOR M .M.A. � .. ' � J • - i�r J'% �' Y �.Z �• � a . / ••�.i C/1 �,./ ��:-� ; : /�•:.y J .r`w ;~ %r, ' � V . . �:� . r . FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY _-- ��, n , � FOR Z.B.T., LOCAL Na. 320 �. . r"i a.._ �-. . � � � . . � �� -m-�-P _..._ �� rP � • � • ��~��.� • . . , _�g_ -ZO- � . 18 4! ' APPENDIX.A 1. WAGE R11'TE S ' �Start ........................................$1,026 After Six Months... ..•• ••• •••••••••••• " " ��'2�8 . ........ ••• $ �326 AfterOne Year........t ............................ .. 1 After Two Years. . .................. $1.,423 ........ ...,....... After 36 months of continuous employment.....$ 1,520.00 per month 2, (a} Employees classified or assigned by the EMPLOYER to the fallowing job classifications or po�itions will receive • eighty-five dollars ($85.00) per month or eighty-five do�llars ($85.00} pro-rated for less than a iull rnonth in ad.dition to their regular wage rate: . Investigator (detective) School Liaison O�ficer Juvenile Officer Doc� Hanc�Ier Paramedic. � � (b) k.mployees classified by the EDZPLOYER to the �o13.owing job classification will•receive fi�ty dollars ($50.00) Per - month or fifty dollars ($SO.OQ) pro-rated f�r less than a full. month in addition to their regular wage rate: Corporal. ..�0� 0 � _2t_ m ' APP�NDIX B This supple:mentary agreement is entered into between the City of Fridley and Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local No. 320 for the period beginning January l,. 1978 and ending December 31, 1978. Nothing is this supplementary agreement may be in conflict with any provision of the MAST�R AGREEMENT between M.A.M.A., the City o� Fri dl ey , and I. n. T., Local No . 3 2 0. In the event of con�lict the NiASTER AGREEMENT will prevail. ARTICLE B-I LEGAL DEFENSE 18 X 5-1.1 Er.iployees involved in Zitigai:ion because of proven negl�igence, or non- - obse�°vance_ of laws, or af a personal naturcys may not receive 1egal cfei=ense . . - . , by, the munici pal i t3►. g_� , 2 t�ny empl oyee wSio i s charged wi th a traf f i c vi ol aii on; c�rcl inance v� ol ati on . or.crin�inal of'fense arising fr,om acts �eri'ormed wi'�hin' the scope of his employmen�,.when such act is performed in good faith arid under direc� order oi' his supervisor, shall be reir�bur�sed'i�ar attorney's fees and� couri costs. actually incu�°re�i by sucn employee in defending against suc� charge. B-1. 3 The Ci ty ofi �'ri dl ey wi 11 prov i de pratecti on f�r al ] Offii�cers ancl Pa tral men against'false arrest charges. 0 �2��. 0 � . � � � � -22- • �.8 Y l�RTICL� B-2 LOSS OF SfNIORITY � � ' � � ' g..2, j Cmn7 oy�ees shal l 1 ose. i:hei r seni orf i:y for il�e fio110�•�7 ng reasons : . , '�. U�ischarge, if not reversed. � f �b. R��siyn�tion. . • � � c. Unexcused iailure to return to �•rork after ex��iration of a vacation � ' oi^ formal lcave of absence. Cvents beyond the contral of the ea:ployee which � preveni: �he� emnl oyee f rom returni ng 1:o work ti•ri 11 not cuase 1 oss � of seniority. „ . d. R��tirem�nt. . . . . �. .. . � . ARTICLE g-3 PRqaATIONARY PERIODS . • . . � ' • . : . � •. All n+ewly hired or rehit;ed emp1oyees will .ser��e a twelvP (12j months � � proba ti onary �er � �� . . . � � - � . � . ARTICLE B-4 VAI�ATIONS � . . � � . . � � . � � � .� � Each empl oyee of the Ci �y r��ho has warked regt�i arly -For the Ci iy �or a � � period of not less than t�,�elve (12) successive months,is en�ci�led to a� .� . vacation a��ray from•employment titi�il:h pay. llaca�iot� nay shail be canpuLed at � the regular rate of pay to'which such emnloye� is en�i�led. An emp7oyee � who has r�orked a ininimu�ii o�' t►�elve (12) moi�tns is en�ii:led io ane (1) � workday of vacation for e�ach month so i��orked. �n emnlayee ti�rho has worked � �eight.y-four (a�) �onsecutive moni.hs is entitled to one and one-half (1.--1I2) ' � workc�ays ofi vacation for each month �vorked beginnirg with the eighty-tifth � (g5} month of consecutive emplo��ent. An employee who has ti�rari:ed one . hundr�ed eighty (130) successive months is entil:led to one and t�ro-thirds . (1-2i'3} �,�orkdays ai' vacation for each month �,►orked beginning �rith tne • one hundred eic�hty-first (lalst) month af consecu.tive employment: _22_ ' A(t7I CI.0 �_5 -z 3- l101.I DAYS ' En,pl oyees wi 11 recei ve eleven (11) hol i days. 0 � �ART�CLE B-6 SICK LEAVE , •� , ' ' . � ' B-6.l Any�employee ��ho is unable to �•rork because of sickness or injury�may �' obtain a lcave af absence upon notice 1:o thc C�i�y. IJriti:er� verii'ication � '. af hi s con� i ti on� by a competer►i: med •i ca.� au �hori 1�y may b� reaui red , l8 Z �ai 1 ure �o � noti fy t3��e Ci ty subj ects �he er.i�l oyee to an�ropri ate di sci p1 ine by the Ciiy. g_6, 2 Each empl oyee of the Ci �:y wt�o has ►•�orked regul a��iy far the Ci ty for a . . period of not less than t�velv� (12) successive ►nonths is entitled to sick . leave. � Si ck leave pay sha11 be compu�ed at ti�e regul ar rate of pay �o ��;ni ch �such �mployee is enti�led. An em�loye� is en��tled �o one (lj bay of sick 7eave for each montS; worked, cumula�ive ta o��e lz�ndred twenty {120) days t�f .sick leave. Afi:er one hundred ivrenty {�2a) earned a�id unused ciays of sic:k le�ve have accumulated, one (1) day adcli�ional vacation shali b� grante�d to an employee for every three (�} sick leave days earned and unu�nd. The err�ployee may� elect, a�fter ninety (9�� earned and unused days �f s�cl; ' leave 1�ave accumul�-�ted, to receive one (1} day addi�;ional v�cation for ever,y ' three (3) sic4: days earned �nd Unused: � Sicl: lcave days sha7l n�� accumu1atc� �. beyond one hundred t��,�en�y (120). , 6efore any sick leave comperssatian is p3'Id, . • . the Ci ty may requ es t and i s enti tl ed io rec� i vc ��om any empl oye� t��ho has . _� _ .. been a�sent more tha:� three (3) days .in suceess�an, a certii'icate signed by a competent physician ar other medica1 attenda�ii: c�r�ifyin�� to the fact that the absence �,�as in fact due to sickness and not other��ise. The City also r�serves the right to have an examination made'a'� any i:ime of any • person claiminq absence by reason of sicf;ness; such examinatian may Ge r�ade . when �t��e City deems th� same reasonably necessary i:a �erity �:he sicl;n�ss . claimec� and may be made in bchaif of the Cii:y by any compei:ent p�rson � , designai:ed by the Cii:y. -23- � ' 0 . � _ • • f . � ' . -24- � _ . � 18 AA /If{7ICLE a-7 FUtJERAL PAY . � . .. Fuileral 1 eave tiri i 1 t�e yrantid to fiul l time cmpl nyees up to a maximum of " ' . Lhre�� days. Funeral leave is gran�ed in c�,se ofi deaths occuring in the � ' immediate famiiy. Far this purpos� immecli�tc i'a�nily is considered to be �. a spc,use, chi 1 d, parent, :.gra��cparen'G, brother or si si:er, mother--in-1 aw . and fath2r-in-law. . � � . . �. � � � /1RiICLE �.-8 J�'IRY PAY . . . . . ' . �� ' It sha11 i�e ur►dersi:oo� and agreed that the City sha17 pay a11 regular � � .. full time employeAs serving on any jury �h� differences in sa7ary bet��een . jury pay and his`regu7ar salary or pay t•�f�ile in such service. . � ARTICLE B-� SE:VERANCE PAY . � , Severance pay will �e paid �n employ�e upon honorable separation of emplo;�m�nt in accordance with the fol7ojring: • An employee with forty-ei yh� (48) or nzore consecuti ve n�nths of �. employn�ent will receive severance pay in casn based or� one and one-half ' (1 z} days of severance pay for each twelve consecutive mm �ths worked. The amount of severance pay due an employee shall not exceed one-third (lj3j of their unused sick leave. � � . . � : , . • . • ; . -24- . ,. _25= . S�'OR CITY OF� .�RI DL�Y . . . • . � " � . Y� I L I_ I AJ�1 J. N E f- t•1AY O R � , ', ' KRSII'I M. Ql1RESHI - CI7Y P�iI�iJAGER � � FOR �tI��l��SOT!� TE�r;STERS PUaLIC AND LAtd Et�FORCEP�lEP1T � . �. ' Et�PLOYEE��' 1I t� L:CL�., y0. 320 � � �. , �' J �' ,2;9 - ,� r . � • - � / . � � . � . � . . 18 BB �� I het�eby recommend to the City Council approval • ' ' • • af thi s agreeir�ent, � • . . �, . . , . 7� � � . -G��'Ld - � . 1911I�UIN C. 6RU�1SEL!_, IISST. CIT1' P9GR./FII�. DIR. �25- � . , . . - �� MEMO T0: Dick Sobiech, Public Works Director MEMO FROM: Jerrold L. Soardman, City Planner MEMO NO.: DS #78-46 MEMO RATE: September 6, 1978� RE: Downtown Improvement Project Progress Report As per the action by the City Council, we are in the process of determining the direction which we need to take in order to facilitate downtown development. I have met with several consultan�s regarding. this item and I am in the pracess of putting together a consultant bid �' proposal which seems to be the most beneficial to the City. Al1 of th� consultants seemed to feel that the area was very mark�table and �that a market study would not benefit us in the development of the prop�rty. � However, they did feel that it would be important to put together a deveiopment packag� that we could apprach various developers with. This package woiuld include a layout of all properties that would be made� available �y the City, assessed valuation of properties, engineering details su��h as a sewer and water availability, traffic improvements � proposed, indications of financing proposals such as tax increment, �commercial development bonding, EDA, HUD Block Grant, etc.; discussicns with presei�t o�vers;-as well as potential developors for possible merginq of developrnent interests. This package should be as detailed as possible and should be coordinated by a consultant that has had experience in thi s type ��f proposal . � I would suggest that the City follow two basic steps f�r the develop- ment of the downtown area. l. That the City hire a consultant t� put together a development package to be phased, with the first phase to in.clude the property north of City Nall. The phasing w�uld not only a11ow us to develop in_ a more systematic approach, but als� ailotv us �o increment our financing in smaller, more feasible, packages. This approach would allc�w tne City more flexibi7ity in overall developm�nt. _ 2. The City Either take the initiat�ve in apFroaching developers, or i:hat the City retain the consultant to follow through with the final developmen� of the do�,►ntown area. I would recommend the second altHrnative and wou�d carry through with consultant.activiiy in the. marketing of the total project. I have been encouraged by my discussions with the consultants and feel that the ar•ea has a high potential for developmeni. I would like to bring a consultant bid proposal back to the City Council on the September 25, 197$ meeting for approval so that we can tatce the first step toward downtown improvement:s. �n�tial indications place consultant costs in the ,range o;. $15,000 to $20,000 depending on our staff support on information gathering. JLB/de cc: Ray Leek !3!� vr� F.OR COhCURRENCE. BY THE C{7Y C�UNCiI. - CLAIMS L SEPTEh1BER 11, 1�� CHECK 1'�0, 236�'��3 -- �10. 25��397 ��_. � . , • . . ; . , � �=.ort coNCU�RCt�CE �Y TNE CITY COUNCIL - LI�NSEs Sep tember 11, 1978 . EXCAVATING • APPRCJV�D BY : Metro Sewer & 4later � 1010 Currie Avenue , DARREL CLARK Minneapolis, MN 55432 By: Larry Walde �� Com.•,pev. Adm. Schnapp Plumbing . � 11614 Flintwood Street � DARREL CLARK Coon Rapids, MN 55433 By: Kennetti Schnapp. Com . Dev. Adm. 6AS �ERVICE� � • . . � 21 � Alaskan Air Conditwning Inc. , , . - 1200 Chestnut Avenue North WILLIAhI SANDIN Minneapolis, MN 55403 • By: Curt Brekke . � lbg. & Htg. Insp. D& D Anderson Heating & Plumbing �, � , Route #2, Bax 744. • WILLIAM SANDIN Cambridge, N[N 55008 'By: Darius Anderson Plbg. & Htg. Insp. � - • ,. . The Snelling� Company ' - 1400 Conc�rcLia • . • . • WILLIAbS SANDII3 St. Paul, NIl�1' 5510�4 . By: Willard Krinkie ' . Plbg. & Htg. Insp. GENERAL CbNZ'RACTOR . �. . • • . � Stanley Carl.sten Gen. Contr. By: Stanley Carlsten .. 6528 University Avenue N.E. ' � DARREL CLAI�K Fridley, MN 55432 . � • ', Com. Dev. Adm. Gene Egan Canstruction • � � . � 8924 Van BuY�en Street N.E .': ' DARTtEL CLARK �.Blaine, MN 55434 ' B.y: Eugene Egan . Com. Dav. Adm�. • � �, Haldeman-Homme, Inc. 450 Industri.al Boulevard , DARREL CLARK . Minneapolis, MN 55413 ' By: Wi].liam Homme. C7om. Dev. Adm. Heritage Builders ' 409 MapYe Avenue N.E. � DARREL CLARK - Spring Lake Park, NII�T 55432 By: Frank Daughenbaugh Com. Dev. Adm. Metro�Metals, Inc. � . ' 4345 Lyndale Avenue North , ' DiARREL CLARK � Minneapolis, NIDI 55412 By: Lawrence J. Fischer . Com. Dev. Adm. Mobil Home, Ni�nnesota ' 200 Mayfair Road DARREL CLARK St. Paul, MN 55101 By: Reed Beckler Com. Dev. Adm. Pool Installation Experts �2231 Cardinal Place ' ��L �� St. Paul, NIlV 55119 By: Terry Rubbert Qom. Dev. Adm. 0 , • � � � f=.OR CONCURRCt�CE E3Y THE CiTY• COUNCII. - LIC�NS�s � 21 A � . Se t �tledge Const�raation Company � � ' 1409 5outh 7th 5treet ' DARREL CLARK ,• Fiapkins, MI3 55343 By: Thomas Rutledge C�n. Dev. Adm. . �tain �City Storm � ' . • 2641 Louisiana South. • '- DARR'EL �CLARK MinneapoZis, MN 55426 By: Sazn Rozman Com. Dev. Ac�n. Ray Warners Home Improv�ment Company ' . 4421 Urband�le Court ' DARREL CLARK Hamel, NIDT 55340 � By: Ray Warner Com. Dev. Adm. " Viking Home Improvement Co. . . . � 4832 - 2� Street N.E. DARREL CLARK Minneapolis, MN 55421 , By: Lloyd Merrell . Cam. Dev. Adm. HEATING . • . � D& D Andersan Heating & Plu�nbing � Route #2, Bo:x ?54 '. FIILLIAM �ANDIN • , Cambridge, I�J 55008 By: Darius Anderson Plbg. & Htg. Insp. � . � �. . ' . ' � ' � ' . � . • � !9 0 `'� �.c►r� coracvR�cr�cc DY Tf�iC CtTY COUh�CiL -� r�U��zPi:� uwEC.�Irac ........ r. Se,�tember 11, 197� LiCCNSES � � 2� � ADDRESS UNITS FEE � APPROVED BY: Rogers pra�erties 5851 - 2nd St. NE 6512 - 50th Ave. N�o. Mpls, MN 55428 � . � Frank Ouellette � 6061 - 2nd St. NE 6061 - 2nd St.� !�E Fridley; MN 55432 Mary A. Sinner 5511 - 2nd St. NE 4427 Monroe NE Mp1s, MN 55421 Gerald H. Guimont . 6551 - 2nd St. NE 2187 Lakebrook �r. New Srighton, MN 55112 Cheryl McCluskey 5770 - 22 St. NE 7957 t�IcKi nl ey St. NE Spri ng Lake Park, MSV 55432 Duayne E. Roepke 5035 - 3rd St. NE 4533 Lakeland Ave. Robbir�sdale, MN 55t�22 David L. Oh1inJWayn� C. Turnbu7l �974 - 3rd St. NE c/o News Realty • 6500 Barrie Rd. '� Edina, MN 55435 Curtis 8. & Pamela C. Sorum 590Q�- 3rd St. NE 5900 - 3rd St. N�, #3 Fridley, MN 55432 David C. Nelson 5980 - 3rd St. NE 17631 Chameleon St. NW ,Anoka, MN 55303 • Arvid C. Peterson 5320 - 4th St. NE 8029 Erie Ave. Ghanhassen, MN 55317 . Larry Nable 5419 - 4th St. NE 7381 Jackson St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 � � Gordon V. Jorgenson 5644 - 4th St. NE 2225 Chalet Dr. Mpls, MN 55421 Margaret Hendley 5800 - 4th St. NE ]�8 NE Craig Way � Fridley, MN 55432 Page 1 11 $ 20.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 7 � 15.00 �i 2�.ao 7 15.Q0 4 15.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 4 15.00 7 15.00 4 15.00 R.D. Aldrich, Fire f�rev, R.D. Aldrich, Fire� Prev. �.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aidrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Pr�v. R.O. Aldricl�, Fire Pt�ev. R.D. Aldr�ch, Fire Prev. R.O. A7drich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. A1drich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire PrEV. `�� F'.pf� COhJCURRCNCC C3Y TI-#C C1TY c0UP1C1l. ' p:TULTIPI_E UWC! I.ItJC _ September 11 »�II � LICENSES' 21 C ER ADDRESS____ _ UNITS FEE � APFROVED BY: Eugene F. Welter 5704 - 56th Ave. No. I Mpls, MN 55429 ' Curtis Bostrom 5652 Regis Trai1 � Fridley, MN 55432 same owner as above F. Duane & Joan Huie Bryan Kingsriter 4031 Bethel Drive, #11 St. Paul, MN Roscoe Smith & Charles Hommeyer 3504 Larchwood Minnetonka, MN 55343 Duane C. Googins 3064 - 116th Ave. NW Coon Rapids, MN �5433 James R. Lund 2735 - 160th Lan� NE At�oica, M3d 55303 James R. lund same address as above same owner as above same owner as above j David W. Rust 5735 Quincy St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Ralph W. Hayne 5214 E. Bald Eagle Bivd. White Bear Lake, M�' S5110 Fit-Bar 5217 Wayzata Blvd, #108 Mpls, MN 55416 Kenneth G. Larson 3232 Tndependence Ave. N. Mpls, MN 55427 5370 - 5th St. NE 5400 - 5th St. NE 5410 - 5th St. NE 5428 - 5th St. NE 5451 - 5th St. NE 5400-02 - 7th St. NE 1050 - 52nd Ave. NE i090 - 52nd Ave. NE 1120 - 52nd Ave. �,E 1170 - 52nd Ave. NF 262 - 51th Place NE 105 - 58th Ave. NE 151 - 59 2 Way NE 350 - 75th Ave. NE Page 2 3 4 4 4 $ 15.00 .15. 00 15.00 15.00 32 40.00 3 15.00 ]6 24.00 �6 lb 16 8 24.00 24.00 24.00 20. 00 7 15.00 12 20.00 11 20.00 R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, � Fire Frev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fir� Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. • R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. `��? F.OR CONCUi7RCNCC DY it-1C CiTY� COUP�lCfL '� MUL.TIPLE UWE!.l.? �- September 11, 1978 � L,If.ENSES � 21 D OWNER ADDRESS UNITS FEE �� APPRQVED BY: Jeffrey Mosiman 181 � 79th Way NE 8 $20.00 R.D. Aldrich, 9242 Flanders St. NE - Fire Prev. Blaine, MN .55434 M. A. Biddle 211 - 79�h Way NE 4800 Cedar Lake Rd. Mpls, MN 55415 Virginia T. Carlson 231 - 79th Way NE 231 - 79th Way NE, #5 Fridley, MN 55432 Denis L. Villella � 321 - 79th Way NE 5756 Twin Lake Terrace Mpls, MN 55429 . River Road East Corp. 6550 East River Rd. 19 South First St., Suite 2308B Mpls, MN 55401 Five Sands Development Co. � 7805 East River Rd. Nirsch-Newman"�Co. 520 Shelard Tower Mpls, MN 55426 same owner as above '7825 East River Rd. same owner as above same owner as above same owner as above Dennis Majors & Glenn M�ers c/o VIP Prop�rties by Velasco 5172 Lincoln Drive Edina, MN 55436 Hughes Properties 4410 Douglas Ave. 50. Mpls, MN 55416 same owner as above same owner as above 7845 East River Rd, 7875 �ast River Rd. 7895 East River Rd. 5701 Nwy. 65 NE 6670 Lucia Lane NE 6680 Lucia Lane NE 6690 Lucia Lane NE Page 3 8 20•.00 7 �15.00 8 20.00 140 148.00 59 59.00 59 � 59.00 59 67.00 59 59.00 59 59.Q0 32 � 40. 00 16 24.00 16 16 R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D, Aldrich, � Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev.. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. 24.00 R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. 24.00 R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. �`�� C".t)(2 COidCURFZCNCC F3Y TIiE Cl7Y COUtJCiL " MULTiP(�E Uw�! �rrar 21 E � Se tember 11 _ � p . ,1978 LICENSES Ok'NER � ADDRESS UNIiS FEE ' APPROVED BY: Dennis'Majors.& Clenn Myers 995 Lynde Dr. NE 32 $40.00 R.D. Aldrich, c/o VIP PropertiE�s by Velasca � Fire Prev. 5172 Lincoln Drive Edina, MN 55436 Duane P. Tollefsan 4030 Main St. NE 4 15.00 R.D. Al�ri.ch, 8690 Van Buren NE � Fire Prev. Blaine, MN 55434 • Rodney M. Waara 6021 Main St. NE Fricfley, MN 55432 A. T. Gearman 6225 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Herman Rice 8531 West 29th St. Mp1s, MN 55426 6021 Main St. NE 5650 Polk St. NE 6111 Star Lane NE � Page 4 � 4 15.00 32 40.00 18 26.00 R.D. Aldrich, � Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. R.D. Aldrich, Fire Prev. � U� � . 22 0 �.OR CONCURRENCE BY THE C!'iY C4UNCIL — ESTIMATES ,. SEPTEMBER 1�., 197� N.U.H. Incar�orated 700'Industry Avenue NbJ Anoka, MN 55303 PARTIAL Estimate No. 1- S�reet Im�rovement Project $i17,�40.86 ST. �978-6 � V � � � F.OR CQNCUf�RENCE BY TNE ClTY COUNCIL - APPOIiJTi��1E,VT _ SEPTET�1BER 11, 197a ., �JAME. Sidney C. Inman 3101 Kentucky South St. Louis Park, MN 55426 POS I T I Otd Accounts & Budget Officer c SALA�Y $1560 Per Month EFFECTIVE D�1Tc Sept. 25, }978 0 REPLACES Randy Fury 23