The URL can be used to link to this page

12/03/1979 - 5742}d: �R1��-�'� C1� }}ECECIBE� 3, 7 : 30 P„ 1`�� 9 " _--- , ��,GU�A� i°IEEjI41G " .. ___------'" Yo�R ANS�,ati�s � l ``�� _ .. p1.E.ASE x�v� j�F _J_.-- EFOP.E ` �ENT N�A�s �� IOi�S ^iEL1�EL��' Y -�t�E 1yEDNLSDAy � /� /9�/9� I�LPARTI 4RL- StYE A � OF F 1 CG B �e�"v/��'`"_ j`IANA�� S �KANK YOU � � FOL�aWiN.�NE CITY I��K 1N �QU4,CIL MCGTIN�, NEX� REGUI_A� - �F ��,dA� IoNS PRESEI�TATIOtis Foo-rBa�L C�aM? . RD i0 SCNOOL DIS�RICT ��.3 . p,wA presente� APP__ R�� OF MI�JU_ T�S � 1979 �'UB1-I � HERRIDlG T�lEE7IN�, T�OVEh1�ER 1g, APPro�ed , ADOPT�0�1 OF AGE`r�DA: ' p,doPted as PrPSen�ed ��ANCE OPEii F�RU;°1, VISITORS_ (�O�ySIDERATIUN OF No Response IT Ef•1S NOS ON AGENDA ' I� i�INUTES) PUBI.IC__, kitARI��GS: ,,A��c� oF �700.000 —_`l [�ROJECT FOR ISS., C6MPANY Tp SIMER pllMP PUBLIC HEARIN� �N PR�POS�D $p�yD �CT, t�11�iNESOTA D[4EtOFMEl�i Rf.VE.^1UE INDUSiRiAL INDUSTRIAL DEVE.1-OPt�M1ENT' 1 ` ' , , TNE i�1UtdICIPA�7t} AS �ME.ND�D` •� g;03 P.M• �iNDER i;4P�iER ' M. > closed at ):48 P• �979, Item iI10) $TA�UTES, � o �ned a� , 138- Near$e Resolutic�n No NO ACIION ( ,____,__.-- �--�--�"......v�--� '"_ _ _� �L� B�SINESS� P � --------- 2 ,,,,,��'' ,,� APPOINTMENT �O9 ��A� `RESOURCES ,CO979SS �TABLED 11/5:7 0� December », Tabled to MeetiP9t �tem on agenda of December 17 R ACTIO�� ' e �iC1� B_- USINESS' P,S, #79-02, INNSBRUCK . CONSIDERATION OF F1NAL PLAT, _ '' ',,,,,,�� VILLAGES 3RD ADD1T10N, BY DARREL A� FARR DEVELOPME �ORPORATION� ' ' � � 'roved Final Plnformpapplicant of Council action � ACT I0� 3-3A COMSIDERATION �F N� PpPII`SjR ETNTO 66'� AVENUEY �'''� STREET, FROM I�IISSISSI �yo action to be taken. Public Works to be advised regardin9 snov+p�owin9 ardin9 snow plowin9 , p�T�1 NEEDED: Inform Alazntenance reg � q-4A _--. J__�_..�— . WEI�I BUSIPlESS (CoN�rtNUED) s � RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION ��IINUTES OF 5-5z 1979. � ' � � . � � � ' ' � � � � � � , , 1 iVOVEMBER J� P1at, PS #79-03. 5A _ 5G 1. Consideration of ProPKar�laPBlombergry•:'ulations ...• & 5P, 5Q ' Blomberg Estates, bY APproval with stip p,� ecomme.__;ndat10n` Set Public Hearing for . Council Action Needed: � January 14� Z9��1 $� 14, 1980 Hearing set for January on �anuary 14 ACTIO�N_ NEE�EO' Make arrangenients for hearing Requests from Service 5M 2, Consideration of Fundin9 Human Resources Minutes).••:: 5R _ 5U Or9anizations (Receiving (Human ResoNOVaI forUOr9anizations p,�. Recommendation: App rocedure to be set UP listed, and establishment of P as recommended Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendations Staff to prepare resolution for fund�+n9 by Commission with Kopin9 with Kids increased to �2�5Q0 ACTIO____ � NEE�E�' Prepare resolution as directed for next regular meeting 3, Item from Appeals Commission Minutes of November 13, 1979 Charles D. Peugh, Si9ncrafters, 5V _ 5X Variance Request to Increase Square rootage of Free Standing Sign, bY .......... 6071 University Avenue N.E ................. & 5Y, 5 p,�. Recommendation: Derial of request Council Action Needed: Consideration of recomm " Request denied `�, ACTIO_____N_NEE�E�' Inform applicant of Council denial a i'JE4a I3USIfJESS (CoNTiNUED) — 19�9, . RECEIVING CATV COMMISSION i"�1NUTES OF �CTOBER 24, 1 CATV�ReconmendationTV Approvai�of�amendmentsdas�ts ' 6' 6F listed Council Aciion Needed: Set Public Hearing for January 14, 19�80 ACTIO�E�� Make arran9emerits for hearing on January 14 A 61-6F CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING ilJSURANCE BID FOR I98O� �� 7-7E Staff to research further. Tabled to next meeting ACTIO� � Research further and put on next agenda with recommendaticn IRECEIVING ANIMAL CONTROL BIAS AND Ah'ARDIN6 CONTRACT �BIDS OPENED Il A�M�� II�ZOI%9� � � � � � ' ' ' ' 1 . Tabled for two weeks ACTIO� �� Put item back on next reyuiar Agenda of December 17, 79 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FlPPROVIt�16 AGREEMENT WITH STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR TRAFFIC SI6NAL ON ' TH #47 aT 69TH AVENUE . AND CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA COUNTY FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON TH #�I% AT 69-rH AvF� AND RECEIVING COMMUNICATION FROM ANOKA COUNTY REGARDING Z5� PARTICIPATION IN THE SIGNAL THROUGN I'�ETRO RE6I ONAL TRAI LS FUND � � � � � � � ' ' ' ' ' ' � � � � + Resolution No. 137-1979 adopted. Agreement with Councii approved and conm�ur�ication received AC7IQN NCED[D: Have agreements executed and forwarded to appropriate bodies � � r � C �EW $USINESS (CONTINUED) CONSI N OF A RESOLU7ION �IVING PRELIMTNARY " APPROVAL TO AN AGREEMENT BE7PlEEN SIPIER PUMP COMPANY AND THE CITDUS?RIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUEEBONDA �� 700,000 IN Resolution No. 138-1979 adopted ACTIO_ N N_ EEDE�: Proceed as authorized , CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PL.ANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND E.STIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT T 1980-1 $IVERTS �Af4E� � � � � � � ' ' ' ' ' , , 10 — lO F , , 11-11B fdo, S � Resolution No. 139-1979 adopted with stipulations regarding assesVacati n. ACTIO__N NEE�E�_ Change resolution as directed CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FOR INiTIRL APPROVAL OF THE OFFICIAL DRAFT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOP— MENT PLAN FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY FOR SUBMISSIOfV TO 12 ADJACENT COMMUNITIES FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT� �� Item tabled to next regular meeting ACTION NEE�E�: Put item back on next regular agenda of December 17, 1979 � CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE OFFICIAL DRAFT OF THE CRI7ICAL AREA PLAN FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MINNES6TA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 13 BOARD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL� � � � � � ' ' ' ' ' � � Resolution No. 140-1979 adopted with change regarding Islands of Peac ACTION NEEDED: Make change in resolution regarding Islands of Peace Mana9ement as directed. � I �EW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) � CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRAT.ON TO APPLY FOR FUNDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FRIDLEY COMMUNITY PARK PROJECT PROPERTY UNDER THE PROVISIO�F OF THE FEDERAL LAND AND WATER CONSERVA- TION FUND ACT AND TNE STATE P�ATURAL RESdURCES FUND. �� Resolution No. 141-1979 adopten for funds ACTIO____ N_NEE�E� Proceed with app y 9 � 14-14A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS � FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NATURE CENTER VISITOR BUILDING� � 15 - 15 A Resolution No. 142-1979 adopted ACTIO� E�E�: Proceed with advertising for bids CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLU"iION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND AND THE PUBLIC UTILITY 16 - 16 D FUND TO THE GARAGE CONSTRUCTION FUND� � � � � � ' ' ' ' Resolution No. 143-1979 adopted ACTION NEEDE�: Proceed as authorized e APPOINTMENT - CITY EMPLOYEE� � � � � � . . � . � � � � 17 AGTIONuNEEDED�thPreParetPersonneliActionLFormnforeAccountingChief P�E�d BUSIPdESS (CoNTiNUED) �STIMATES� � � � � � ' ' ' ' ' � � � � Approved ACTION NEE�E�: �aY estimates V J ,,,,,,,,,18-18K 0 CLAIMS� , � � . � , . � , � � . � � . , � � � � � � . � 19 ppproved ACTION NEE�E�: PaY claim�, LICENSES� � � � . � � � � � � � � , � � � . � . , � � � . 20-20A Approved ACTIO___ N NEE�E�.: Issue ]icenses COi�IP9UNICATIONS: IND� SCHOOL DIS7RICT #14: BOARD OF EDUCATION ACTIONS� � 21-21G Received communication. Councilpersons Moses and Barnette appointed to meet �aith School Board Members regarding FEST. Administration to send letter informing Board of this ACTIOfd NEE�E�: Inform School Board of Council appointments to meet with School Qoard g ANOKA COUNTY COMMISSION WORKSHOP: PUBLIC ACCESS PROGRAMMIN6 REPORT. � � � � � ' ' ' ' ' � � � � � � � � Report received NO ACTION NEEDED ADJOURiV iz:o3 a.M. 22-22� e FRI7�'('�tTY COUNCIL Pf�ETING , :ASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTcD IN DATE: December 3, 1979 ,�E A�DRESS _ITEM NUMBER __ _ FRIDLE1l CIT�Y REGULAR h1EETIPlG — DECEP1BE�2 3, 1979 — 7:30 P•, M, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAl�CE: PRESEIdTATIOid OF AiJARD: AWARD TO SCHOOL DISTRICT #13 FOOTBALL CHAMPIONS APPROVAL OF MIP�UTES: PUBLIC HEARING �'�EETING, NOVEMBER �.9, �979 AD4PTIO�J OF AGE��DA; OPEN WRUi�1, VISITORS. � �CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA - 1� IfIINUTES) PUBLIC HEARI�JGS: PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PROJEGT FOR ISSUANCE OF �%OO,OOO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND TO SIMER PUMP COMPANY UNDER THE F�UNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL �EVELOPMENT ACT, MIP�NESOTA 1_ 1 C STATUTES, CHAPTER 4J4, AS AMENDED� �.� � � � ' ' ' ` ' � � p� BUSINESS; e � APPOINTMENT TO HUMAN RESDURCES COMMISSION �TABLED IIIS�%9) � � � � � � � � � , � � � � � � . � . . . 2 s C�EI�1 BUSINESS: . CONS ON OF FINAL PLAL P.S� �rJg—OZ, INNSBRUCK VILLAGES 3RD ADDITION, BY DARREL A� FARR DEVELOPMENT .. 3_ 3 A CORPORATION. � � � � � � . � � � • • ' ' ' � � • � � � � CONSIDERATION OF NO PARKIP�G SIGNS FOR McKiN�EV 4- 4 A STREET. FROM ��IISSISSIPPI STREET TO 66� AVENUE� ��' � M .,, � P, �JE�J BUSINESS (CorvTINUED) RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION P'�INUTES OF � NOVEMBER 7, i979, , , , , � � ,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,5-5Z 1. Consideratior� of Proposed Preliminary P7at, PS #79-03, Blomberg Estates, by Karta Blomberg........ P.C. Recorrrnendation: Approval with stipulations �"' 5A - 5G Council Action Needed: Set Public Hearing for & 5P,,5Q January 14, 1979 a 2• Consideration of Funding Requests from Service Organizations {Receiving Human Resources Minutes)..... 5G - 5M P.C. Recorrmiendationn RApproval Moruorganizations -••... 5R - 5U listed, and establishment of procedure to be set up ` Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendations + 3. Item from Appeals Commission Minutes of Navember 13, 797g Variance Request to Increase Square Footage of Free Standing Sign, by Charles D. Peugh, Signcrafters, A�C� RecommendatAonnueDenEal of request ............ 5Y - 5X Council Action Needed: Consideration of $ 5Y> 5Z recommendation - 7 ., i�EW I3USIPJE$$ (CONTINUED) ' 19�9. . f CATV Prposed Ordinance Amendments..... 6- 6F RECEIVING CATV COMMISSION T'�INUTES OF �CTOBER 2� 1; Consideration o ppProval of amendments as CATV Recommendation: tor isted Set Public Hearing Council Action Needed: January 14, 1979 e CONS,IDERATION OF AWARDIN6 INSURANCE BID FOR 19g�' ''� 61-6F 1-7E RECEIVING ANIMAL CONTROL BIDS AND AWARDIN g-8D CONTRACT �BIDS OPENED 11 A�M�� 11�2��9� � � � � � � � CONSIDERATION �F NE OTALFOR TRAFFROVSIGNAI: pNMENT WITH STATE OF MIN TH #47 AT 69TH AvEKUE � � AND CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL �FSAGNAL ONTTHI#�i�AATK69THUAVE. , FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFI AND RECEIVING COMMUNICI�ITHEFSIGNAL THROUGHT�'IETROARDING 25% PARTICIPATION � � , , . � . REGIONAL TRAILS FUND� � � ' ' ' ' � � � g-9K . � �� UED� � PRELI�1NARY SINESS �CONSIN oN G1�1N QUMY �OMPANy i�EW �� A RESOL�il � SIM�R pF p `�� AN AGREEM�E� � OR ZHEN 1ssuA�CE .� REVEN�E BOND� � , ��NSIDERA AND ZHE C1'SY O F F R 1 D 0 4 M E N ��Q��OO IND�S'tRIAL D�VEL �: lp ` la .� ORDERIN� IMPR�VEMENT A RESOLIf?lON AND ESTIMATES TTON �F $PECIFICATZ��S pJE�T ' ' � � , CONSLDERA pLANS AN�y IMpROVEMENS PR AND FINAL $TREET � � . � OF COSTS THERE� SIVERTS ��E� , ' rao , ST 1930-L 11 - 11 B ��yiTl}�L �,PPROVAL T OF iHE COMPREHENSIVE DEVEtOP OF A RESOLUTION fOR 12 CON�IDERAtION DRAF FR1DLEY FOR SUBMISSION TO OF THE OFFICIA TNE CITY OF COMMcNT' '��, MENT PLAN FOR REVIEW AND �p�pCENT COMM��ITIES F�R a, OVING 1HE flFFt�tAL APPR �HE CITY OF FRID�EY RESOLIITI P`AN FpR Q�pLITY CONS j OFATµE CRIT CAL AREA ENViRONMENTAL Ty�E N�INNESOTA � � , , , ' ' DRAF , � • ?0 gE SUBMITTED T� APPROVAL, � ' $OARD FOR REVIEW AND __.- 13 .f� ` NEW B� (CONTINUED) � t RpTION OF A DEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION AU7HORIZING THE CONSIDE FUNDS FOR THE UKITY PARK PROJECT PROPER CON ERVA_ ADMINISFRj LEY COMM PLY FOR L�ND AND WATER OF THE �F THE FEDERA REgOURCES FUND� �.' TKE PROVISION S.�A7E �•'pTURAL _� ITION FUND ACT AND THE RESOLUTION 70 ADVERTISE FOR BIDS � TRUCTION OF A NATURE CENSER VISITOR BUILDING� CONSIDERATION OF A FOR CONS , 14-14A , 15-15A ION OF A RESOLUTION A� �D THE�PJB IC UTI�tTY CONSIDERAT GENERAI. FUND A , , � OF FUNDS FROM THE FUND TO THE GARAGE CONSTRUCTION FUND� �''� APppINTMENT - CITY EMPLOYEE� � ,...'''', , 16 - 16 D 4� 17 , (�ONiINUED) , , ' ' , , , , ,", � � 18' - 18 K riEw_ B��ESS . ,,. �STINIATES' ' � � � � � , ' , , , , 19 ,,, . ,,,,,''�''� CL�1MS' ' ' � � � , , ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,,,.��'`�� LICENSES. • ' ' COif�P1UNI CA► I ONS : I�D, $CHOOL DISTRICT #1� Zp-20A D �F �DUGA-[ION ACTIONS. ' 21 21 G $OAR � 4 P�gLIC ACCESS 22 _ �2 I COMMISSION WORKSHOP�, , ' � , , � � ' ' ANOKA COUNl'Y , pROGRAMMIN� RE�'ORj � ' ' d ADJOURN - �*�.o?:_��wi 7�9i��,3'�'8 /p�h'..",r '��Ao..q4f�r � ° , 9S,/.�.� f /`'P��?s`5��,+�5� n�^Yi �� r�V'�� t��'' r yr'"'d�%; hyy �Ili�'w�/��M,�gD�S;..�+� sr�NL°t'`Yrv��-�'S , � v �;�,pti"AyaW�� `1..iy�*,�� d�S�%iJ ^`�--��'�.�:y�C''w.y1 �cf`�.:4,� . !.: r `. , � ��r .rA1+J W'.c -'- .. _ .. _ . � �� ;FS}.. � Y. Q r 0 N W Z Z � � li1 J � K LL LL � } r u �I d � a 0 w 6. � �" � V d � � � 0 U d � v � � � iWSno-r "`t"'•�i �w .�ly. yyq'n„°�"' . ...,�'�: .,.. ""a ��f.'� �� .. 3 G r+:��y�'SL '�^I ,� rk . 'Nnr� � � �'�� f4hbn•�•/��:1 ��v �il "'". r 1 nrf• �+ � � t9e�4�u" i7*��Aria �"y.. ` � M��, � ��Y ��YSir�i��{'�+ �� y��.�ss ft�,_—�,.�, � .. - } rr" i< :.+'.. ;;,{ i' ' ,�.: �.. r }�•. ; �(-� t �; .R . . . �J .�i'�.li� . � • s1 ��`�� .: N1 C d� (Q U �. � N � oPf- � �w � a a Q H �"� � = � a�w w V � F �PO �� ..� J V a Y m x-+ � rn N p � w�"F.� H~�� 0 W �U U � � JLaJ]� � �F-d`:� �JfYF" O ��wF V � w � O �.U-� � .-w_I t t-� F�- p�r�-�d aw ��kiN w = ��w � H '"� F' �1.1 2 U N t.Ny M C 7 F'�/1pH V � � U wr+�� wr+ E-za-� ,e, . • �:, ��i 4'}�bR1 �i,Z�?� ��+.a � , .,4t'h,, itr/.t�rtq_�.. _ . : Mr.l. �P., �;. -. �°�, c n• =:':a^h":. :.a J. z O � F Q U W �. � \ � O G�+ � 0 ~ Cs. � � n rn e+� � � � J d P [� � A �' _ R: � .. q: Cx . -c:v . �'�,�,�.•.vqv� N � �� y:�•T.ac�.y> i✓ '. qy .'Si+,-� ��`a<as . � V N '\ U` � . • Ay THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL�OF NOVEMBER 19, 19%9 � ... The Public Hearing Meeting�of.the Fridley Lity Cour�cil was called.to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Nee. � PLEDGE Of ALLEGIAfJCE: , Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Ailegiance to the Ftag. ) t ROLL CALL: � J MEMBERS PRESEIVT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilwoman Moses, Councilman Schneider and Councilman Barnette MEMBERS ABSENT: None pPPROVAL OF MINUTES: REGULAR MEETI�dG, NOVEMBER 5, 1979: � MOTIOIV by Councilwoman Moses to approve the minutes of November 5, 1979 as pre- sented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting dYe, Mayor Nee declared tne motion carried unanimously. CANVA55 OF ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 1979: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes for the canvaMa or Nee�deon. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all votin9 aye, y clared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGEI�7DA: Mayor Nee requested an item be added under "Old Business" as follows: Appointment � of New Member to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda with the above addition. � Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye> Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS: This informal public hearing was opened a± 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Nee. Counciiman Schneider stated, apparently, when McKinley Street was constructed in 1968, it was narrower than a usual City Street and put in this way in order to save some of the trees. He stated, at that time, there was discussion there wouldn't be parking on the street because it was narrow. � Councilman Schneider stated, over the last several months, he has had several inquires from people wondering why the "no parking" is not being enforced. He stated; therefore, notices were sent for this informal public hearing to hear comnents from the persons in this area. � Mrs. Barbara McCue, 6631 McKinley, stated she would like to see parking on one side and only in the one block between Mississippi and 66th. ��) Mr. Bob KiTwan, 6578 McKinley Street, stated he has lived in this area for ten j years and was not too concerned about the parking on the street. He felt, if there is parking on the street, it holds down the traffic and stated he was not in favor�of the "no parking" signs. � _ ,. l_ l l � YUBLIC HEARING MEETIN6 OF NOVEMBER 19, 1979 PAGE 2 Mr. Henry Lemn, 6621 McKinley, questioned what area on McKinley would be affected� by the "no parking" si9ns. - Ne stated, he understood, when McKinley from 6,jth Ave. to 66th Ave. was put in as a narrow street, it was on the condition that�there wouldn't 6e any overnight parking. � Councilman Schneider stated some of the concerns he heard came from persons in his block because their primary access is through the narrow section of the block. Mr. Lemm stated people living in the area are aware of the conditions and use extreme caution in driving. , it does Councilwaman Moses stated, as far as the informati�on before the Council, indicate "no parking"�signs from Mississippi to 66; Avenue. � Councilman Schneider stated his thought was that> if ar�ything was done, it would be primarily between Mississippi to 66th Avenue. Mr. Gary Rognrud, 6536 McKinley, stated he felt there has never been a problem, as far as he could see> and everyone knows it is a narrow street. He stated he was not in favor of the "no parking" signs on either side of the street. Mrs. Marcella Girard, 6537 McKintey, stated persons who are parked overnight on � the street create a problem for her 6acking out of her driveway, especially in #he winter with the ruts in the street. �� Louncilman Schneider asked if she would be in favor of no overnight parking like iran midnight to 6 a.m. Mrs. Girard stated that would be satisfactory with her. Mr. Dan Borg> 6566 McKintey, felt there wasn't any problem with ttie parking and rnuld see no reason for the "no parking" signs. He stated, if someone was having averni9ht ccrWaRy it would create a problem with no parking on the street. Mrs. McCue stated one of the problems is that she leaves for work at 5:30 a.m. and in the winter it is just about in�possible to get out because the street had not been plowed because cars were parked there. Mr. Anderson, 6577 McKinley, stated he woUld like no avernight parking, but did not �ant to see the street ctuttered with "no parking" signs. He also felt the speed limit should be reduced because of the number of children in the area. Cnuncilman Schneider explained the City could not irt�ose a lower speed limit, as ihis would come under State jurisdiction. i9r. I�yan Benjaminson, 6547 McKinley, stated he was opposed to�posting "no parking" signs. Louncilman Schneider read a letter he received from Mr. Sheldon Benjaminson, 6547 . McKinley, which indicated he was opposed to the "no parking" signs on McKinley. #g. Pat Ballot, 6550 McKinley, stated she has only lived at this residence for a little over two years and when she moved there, didn't know there was no over- night parking. She indicated they do have problems in the winter, with people across the street from her backing on to the street> and getting stuck in the ruts. Louncilman Schneider asked her if she would be in favor of posting "no parking" signs. Ms. Ballot stated to post it for no parking after midnight.would be fine. Councilwoman Ptoses asked, if the�overni9ht parking is a deterrent to keep people in the�area from parking in the street and using their own driveway, and if thi.s was the reason they wanted it. � Mrs. Girard stated all�she is asking for is one little spot so she can get out of her driveway in the morning. Mrs. Karen Kok, 6517 McKinley, stated she lived next to Mrs. Girard, and felt the problem could be alleviated if'the sPace 6etween the Girard and Benjaminson driveway coutd be kept free. If no vehicles were parked there, Mrs. Girard � �could always drive out of her driveway. 6 PUBLIC HENRING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 7979 PAGE 3 Mrs. Girard stated this would be fine with her, but didn't know if it would work. Councilman Schneider asked, if only a small area was posted, i` it was enfo�ceable. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he would be of the opinion that if the Council authorized it, it would be enforceable. Mr. Pineault, 6620 McKinley, pointed out that there are ordinances regarding park- ing.on the street when it is snowing. � Mr. tyyberg, 6561 McKinley, indicated he would be in favor of no parking from mid- night to 6 a.m. Councilman Schneider asked if aRyone from 6526 McKinley was present. There was no response. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the informal pUblic hearing and the Council would review the situation and come back with a recommendation at the next meeting on-December 3, 1979. Seconded by Counci7woman Moses. Upon a voice vote> a71 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared Lhe motion carried unanimously and the hearing closed at 8:05 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET,. SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENT PRO.IECT N0. 1980-1, SIVERTS LANE FROM 69TH AVENUE TO 650 FEET SOUTH: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the publie hearing.. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the .public hearing opened at 8:08 p.m. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the proposal is to put in the sewer and water laterals in Siverts Lane from 69th Avenue to the South and provide a roadway over the right-of-way. He stated the roadway proposed is a narrow roadway, without curb and gutter, because it is felt the volume of traffic �rould be limited and aiso to keep the cost to a bare minimum. Mr. Qureshi stated the estimated cost for the street, without curbing, would be $10.89 a front foot and $].46 a foot for the side yard. The estimated cost per foot for the water lateral is $10.94 and an estimated cost of 3520 for the service. The estimated cost per foot for the sewer lateral is $7.31 and an estimated cost of $300 for the service. � Councitman Schneider-stated he�knows there are people who are concerned with this improvement. He stated he met with some of the residents this last Saturday and several questions were raised. Councilman Schneider�questioned the plans for the public property to the East. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the County has acquired it and this would be under their control, as part of their Park system. Councilman Schneider questioned if it would be a high useage area. Mr. Boardman, City Planner, stated the plan, at this time, would be a shelter area and parking lot. � Councilman Schneider questioned if there would be access through Siverts Lane. Mr. Boardman stated they couldn't be denied access, if this road was constructed. Mr. Qureshi stated this property is already a public access so the City cannot deny the� County access, but would work with them on their plans. Mr. Bob Anderson, 1360 69th Nvenue, stated his feelings as far as the sewer and water and the road is that he is totally against it. He felt it was too much money and that the road did need work, but doesn't necessarily mean it should be paved. I 1 � I 7 PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 1979 � PAGE 4� Mayor Nee asked if he had City sewer and water. Mr. Anderson stated he did and has no need for the road. Mr. Antlerson stated he was told the cost for the sewer � � and water and road would be about $4>600. .:. � Councilman Schneider stated two corner lots would be invoived> and 6oth property owners could make a persuasive argument that the completion of the�road doesn't directly benefit their properties. He stated water and sewer would only benefit ' them, if they were to split off their property in the future, since they already have City sewer and water. � '� Mr. Brunsell, City Clerk, s�tated the assessment cost would be spread on the South ; portion of those lots because they could split this off and make another lot. Mrs. Logid, 7340 69th Avenue, stated she would have no use for this road and asked if she would be assessed. Mrs. Nelson, 1370 69th Avenue, felt the person who is going to profit from the road should pay for it. � Mr. Brunsell stated the people living o� 69th Avenue would not be assessed for sewer and water. � He explained the City's policy regarding assessment for street surfacing and how the assessment is spread down the block so persons living on� corner lots do not absorb all the cost for the side yard. Mr. Ron Germundson, 1390 69th Avenue, stated there is no way the street will 6enefit him and as far as he was concerned, it was a private driveway. Mayor Nee stated the proposed assessment for the road improvenient to Mrs. Logid's property would be about $151 and about $141 for Mr. Gerinundson's property. Mr. Ing Siverts, 6850 Siverts Lane, stated in the public hearin9 notice it mentions storm sewer and questioned if that would be necessary. � . Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, explained that the notice used is a standard form and � �� in this case, there may be a minimum kind of piping, mostly for.surface drainage. i `... Mr. Burton Smith, 6840 Siverts Lane, stated he needed the sewer and water service. � He stated the street would be nice, but he is more wncerned with the sewer and ( �� -- � water. Councilman Schneider stated there are three homes fronting on Siverts Lane and all homes presently have wells and septic systems. He stated he gathered from the letter from Mr. Siverts that sewer and water a�e no longer an issue for the people living on Siverts Lane. Councilman Schneider stated the Halgrims live to the North of Mr. Siverts at 6860 Siverts Lane and from the discussion on Saturday, Mr. Halgrim was from neutral to favorable regarding the improvements. Councilman Schneider questioned if the sewer and water improvement were ordered> if the assessments could be held in abeyance until such time that the lots might be split. He stated this WDU)G involve the two corner lots owned by the Anderson's and the Bacon's. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney., stated, from a legal standpoint, it could 6e a deferred assessment, but he was not sure of the financial problems it might create for the project. �:., Mr. Brunsell, City Clerk, stated often times there are properties that wouldn't � benefit right away from putting in the sewer and water lines and if the City I proceeded on that basis, he feit there would have been a lot of sewer and water � lines that would never have been constructed. He stated he �aas not aware that the City has done anything like this in the past. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated the standard the City is to follow in this kind of assessment is that the Council must make a determination whether the � property that is to be assessed is benefitted at least as much as the assessment. � PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 1979 PAGE 5 r Mr. Herrick stateA, on the other lots on 69th, the proposal for assessing is � �� consistent with the City's policy. �He stated it is a factual determination as� to whether there is�benefit 6y putting in the street. °• � Mr. Siverts asked the City's definition of a street. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated, if the City plows and maintains it, it is a City street. Mr. Siverts stated he has a letter�from Anoka County �,�hich states he owns the land. Mr. Herrick stated almost all public streets are on easements, the underlying. ! ownershi�p of the property is still private> but subject to an easement for a �� public street. He stated he hasn't examined the records, in this ease, but felt it was a public street as the City has maintained it. Mr. Siverts stated he would not be in favor of the alignment of the road, as proposed on the map, and explained the adjustment he would like made. Mr. Qureshi stat2d staff could work with Mr. Siverts to adjust the alignment to save the trees, since there is a 66 foot right-of-way and the road proposed would only be about 30 feet. Councilman Schneider felt it would make sense to adjust the a7ignment and use the East portion and the only question would be turn-around area for the snow- plows. Mr. Anderson felt, if the street is put on the East, it would be crowding his property. PAr. Qureshi explained they would be putting a bend in the road be- yond his property. � Mr. A1 Erickson, 1380 69th Avenue, stated he couldn't see the two lots on the corner paying about $4,500 for someone else's sewer and water since they al- ready have it. Councilman Schneider did point out that the Metropolitan Council and Legislature are concerned with the problem of septic tanks going bad and there has been talk of legislati�on to require mandatory yearly inspections of septic systems and if they go bad, a requirement to hook up to the City's system. He felt it was probably a question of time when the sewer would have go go in. Mr. Siverts asked Mr. Smith if he has a permit to put in his own seuer and water system. Mr. Smith stated he has to have the soil inspected and has to find fitl with a certain percolation rate. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Anderson and Mr. Bacon if the City-were to proceed with the sewer and water improvement and hold ar�y charges in abeyance> until the rear portions of their lots were split, if they would have aRy problems with this improvement. Mr. Bacon felt this would be agreeable with him. M�•. Anderson felt it would be agreeable, providing he has the opportunity to have it reviewed legally and if and when the lot is split, that would be the only time the assessment riould be made. He stated, if he was to sell the property in one whole piece, he would not be in favor of paying the assessment--only if it was split. Mr. Herrick stated it would be le9ally possible to put in the improvement and hold the assessment and file a notice on those lots that if they were ever split, they would be subject to paying whatever the rate would be at that time for sewer and water. He stated that would happen anyway because they couldn't split the lots, without paying the sewer and water charges. Mr. Aasland, 7330 69th Avenue, talked about the drainage past his home ard didn't � feel a storm sewer was necessary. He stated the land is relatively flat and not �� conducive to fast run-off. Mr. Aasland also stated he felt Siverts Lane was a i private entrance ta three properties and how far these owners wanted to go, as i. far as improvement, should be worked out with them and the City. I: PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 1979 PAGE 6 - � Council�nan Barnette pointed out that storm sewer isn't being considered in this project and the notice received is a standard form used by the City> bu{ ;s not involved in this particular project. He explained that the properties.on 69th, with the ezception of Anderson's and Bacon's would not be assessed for sewer and water, but only for the road irtprovement if this is ordered. � Councilman Schneider stated, in his own mind, he is comfortable with everything, except the street surfacing. He felt there were favorable reactions to the sewer and water or it is not being opposed by aRyone that is directly affected, if they ��. can make arrangements regarding the assessments on the corner lots. He felt, as I far as the street> there would 6e only three families using it and�questioned if � some improvement could be made, without making it a fu71 surfaced street. ' Mr. Qureshi stated the only additional cost would be putting a small amount of blacktop on the street. He felt if this wasn't provided, there would be a prob- lem of continually putting a stabilizer on it. Mayor Nee felt the question the three families have to settle is if they are -- willing to live with the results of the street, after it has been dug up, and if not, if they are willing to pdy to have it paved. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this�proposed�-improvement. MOTION�by Councilman Schneider to close�the public heari�ng. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye> Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the pub7ic hearing closed at 9:55 p.m. Mayor Nee informed the people that Council action on this improvement would be at the Council meeting on December 3, 1979. � PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL PLAT, P.S. k79-02, INNSBRUCK VILLAGES 3RD ADDITION BY DARREL A. FARR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: � MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice � and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice � vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared thz motion carried unanimously and the i_,, public hearing opened at 9:55 p.m. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated, 6asica7ly, there was a survey error and in order for the actual buildings to conform with the plat, it is necessary to approve this plat. Mayor Nee stated this plat would involve a slight realignment to correct an error so the plat conforms with the actual structure that has been built. There was no response from arryone in the audience regarding this item of business. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Council- woman Moses. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousty and the public hearing closed at 9:56 p.m. PUBL.IC HEARING ON REVIEW OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER LORRIDOR CRITICAL AREAS PGAN FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: MOTION by Councilwoman Moses to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice � vote> all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and�the public hearing opened at 9:57 p.m. ��-�' Mr. Boardman, City Planner, stated the City is trying to fulfill the requirements, under state legislation> which designates the Mississippi River under the Critical .. Areas Corridor. He stated the draft plan for the City, regarding the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Areas, is now before the Council. . Mr. Boardman stated the plan covers the goals and objectives as laid out in the Comprehensive Plan and there is an implementation section, which is required, that lays out what they anticipate on implementation and capital improvements. i O PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 79>.1979 � PAGE 7 I � �---- Mr. Boardman stated there are critical area regulations which is an overlay . district. He stated these regulations are pretty much laid out by the State. He stated the City is presently operating under state regulations and the ;� City is required to meet those regulations as closely as possible. Mr. Boardman stated�this plan was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and changes were maCe to the plan> as recomnended by the Cortmission. He stated a copy has 6een sent to the Metropolitan Council for their review and their comments are included. M.�yor Nee referred to page 28 of the plan which shows an exception. He stated he understands a single family residence doesn't have to have all the documen- tation. Mr. 6oardman stated the primary concern is for a large development. Mr. Boardman stated he knows there is a lot of concern ahout setbacks. He referred�to page 31 of the plan which requires that all new structures and facilities should not be closer than 40 feet from the bluff line or 100 feet from any normal hi9h water line. He stated these would probably cause the most problems, 6ut the City does have the authority to grant variances in those areas. Mr. Boardman stated the procedure for review of the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Areas Plan was similar to the review of the Comprehensive Plan. He stated other agencizs make a review and submit a recortvnendation back to the City. He stated the approval of this plan by the Council would be only for review by the various metro agencies. He stated the overlay district has to go through the norrnal procedure for ordinance changes. Mrs. Irene Maertens, 144 Riversedge h'ay, stated she was surprised there were changes by the Planning Cortmission, as she had attended their meeting, but had to leave before it was over. She stated a week before the public hearin9, she had tried to find out information about�the FMC property from the Parks and Rec;-eation Director and P�lannina Department, but to no avail. Mrs. Maertens comment about this plan is that it is very vague. She stated the vagueness is about the park system and capital improvements. She stated implementin9 authorities have be2n assigned, 6ut there are no estimated costs. Mr. Boardman, City Planner, then submitted some estimated figures to Mrs. Maertens. Mrs. Maertens questioned the river access and referred to page 18 of the plan. She stated it says there a�e no official public access points, but several do exist and one is by her home. She asked about� the potential of that being designated. Mr. Boartlman stated the primary access point is from the FMC property and discussion of proposed river access is d^wn by the I-694 bri�dge. He stated the area where Mrs. Maertens is located is shown as an overlook and there is access into that park area. Mrs. Maertens stated her only corment on what happened regarding the FMC property is that it didn't go through the Commission channels and came directly to the Council and Council approved it. She felt they weren't informed of what happened. Mayor Nee stated the item�was trrought before Council and the County wanted a decisiDn��within 10 days. Mrs. Maertens stated even a week before the Planning Commission public hearing the Council already had approved this and the Director of Parks and Recreation stated he didn't know of it. She stated there apparently is a lack of communica- tion on such an important project�as this one. - Mr. Dick Harris, Chairman of the Planning Commission, stated he was speaking as a private citizen and wanted to make the Council aware of the unusual boundaries in this plan, as it extends all the way to East River Road. He felt the stringent conditions shouldn't be placed on persons that live several blocks from the River. He stated this was discussed by the Planning Commission and it was their feelin9 to let it go, as written, and let the Council decide. PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 7g7g PA� $ . 11 Mayor Nee asked if it could be adjusted and Mr. Boardn�an stated some modifications were made regarding tree removal, Nr. Boardman stated he didn't know v�hether or. not they could.leave it out and get by wiih it, as the State sets the bounQaries on the designation. ._ . Mr. Harris felt those types of conditions didn't seem reasonable restrictions for people who live several blocks away from the river. Mr..Boardman felt the purpose is to leave the vegetation growth within that � ��.� district along that area. � Mr. Harris felt there was some inconsistencies and that the criteria should be l , ' Federal Governmentegotslow on thisewholehprojectGofewild and scenictrtiverst and he hoped the State would take another look at this whole operation. Mr. Boardman stated there are timetables set up by the State and monies have al- ready been received from the Environmental P7anning Board to do these studies. Mr. Harris stated it bothers him if someone down the street wants to cut down a tree and has to come in for a permit. � Mr. Boardman stated they are referring to new construction and expansion of exist- ing structures and saying if they remove a tree, they have to replace it. Mr. Harris felt they should be concerned about removal of trees on the river bank and within 300 feet, but from there on he can't get concerned about it. Mrs. Maertens, referred to page 22 of the plan, which states the implementing authority for the Islands of Peace is Anoka Ceunty. She questioned how this � came under the County's jurisdiction. Mr. Boardman stated the ir�tementing authority is through a foundation. The �� actual agency that is in charge of the park property itself is the City. He �( stated there has been some talk of including this whole section and including .. the fMC property as a regional facility and the City would still own the park - property, 6ut lease the property to Aneka County, as the imptementing agency . for the metropolitan funds. Mrs. Maertens asked if the concept is that, once the �MC property is developed, then Islands of Peace and �urham Island goes with it. Mr. Boardman stated the FMC property is baing purchased with funds from the Great River Road Project and there has been discussion that the Islands of Peace would be classified as a spur route. He stated all that means is that Islands of Peace would now 6e able to receive Federal funding under the Great River Road project and any irtg�rovements could be done with Federal monies. If Federal monies are spent within Chases Istand and Islands of Peace, the County, as the imp7ementing agency, woutd have to be involved. He stated this doesn't mean the City would have to give up their right of the ownership of tfie land. Mr. Maertens asked about the cost to purchase the FMC property. Mr. Boardman stated he didn't have that figure and Mayor Nee stated what F14C was paying in � taxes was very low. Mr. Harris felt that the Parks and Recreation Commission should be notified of aRY Plans, as it relates to the Islands of Peace. He stated it seemed the Planning Cortmission is always down at the end of the line. lI Mr. Boardman stated he has tried to keep the Planning Commission up to date on this and informed them about the FMC property and potential about it being pur- "" . chased with the Great River Road funds. Mr. Harris stated they have been in- formed, but it seems it is� after the fact. Mr. Boardman stated they did move � very quickly on the acquisition part. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated what the.Council approved when the County was be- fore them was a land use request. e 1�1 PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 1979 PAGE 9 Mr. Harris stated there is more to it than just approving a land use. He ' i sLated that particular parcel was in the Comprehensive Plan as part of the 2,200 units for low and moderate income housing. Mayor Nee stated FMC wasn}� willing to sell the property for that use. - Mr. Harris felt next time something comes up like this, they should stop and � i look at the ramifications. He stated everythin9 has to be done yesterday. e i felt from now on, when something comes in> it sfiould 6e looked at very carefully. i He felt, if the City is cortmitted to 2,200 more�units, they should�start think-� ing about it. i � Mayar Nee stated the City hasn't approved this figure. Mr. Harris stated the � Metropolitan Council is committing the City and the last figure he received . was 2,200 units for the next ten years. He questioned if the City was 9oing to have arry latitude not to approve it. Councilman Schneider stated he objected to saying that 2>200 units is what the City has to approve. Mr. Boardman stated he didn't think, necessarily, the City planned around a � certain number. He stated they are looking at it as a need for the City. He i stated they want to look at it realistically as to need and how to solve it, within certain cost limits and land availabilitY• I Mayor Nee stated he can only tell him that the Council is not being led by the nose by the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney> stated at a well-planned and detailed meeting of attorneys that are specializing in planning in municipal areas, there was a . ; fairly substantial discussion about the Comprehensive Plan. He stated a statement was made by some of the individuals that, once the Comprehensive � Plan is ado�ted, if there is any inconsistency between this plan and zonin9, ; the inconsistency wi11 be resolved by the comprehensive plan. He stated the problem that concerns him and other people is that, while it is true they have been working on it for a long time, and had public �hearings, he doesn't see anyone coming to the public hearings. He is 96eforenthe Comlrehensive Planhis I � area are aware of the implications. He felt, P ' adopted, there better be a very careful analysis that it is not inconsisten with the zoning and if there1�''w uld seemnthattsomewadditionalaeffo�t hasnto be ��. in the present designation, . . .... .. made to get�more people involved in the consideration. Mr. Boardman stated there are several areas where there is a mixture of uses. Mayor P�ee asked, if the plan cha�ges the use as it stands now. P1r. Boardman stated he would like to look at it carefully. He stated there is a six months precess, after the�initial approval by the Ccuncil, where it is reviewed by the Metropolitan Council and metro agenc�ies, and would then like to set up review by the various civic organizations and extensive display for the public. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing on tihe Mississippi River Critical Areas Plan. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 10:47 p.m• . . RECESS: . .. Recess called by Mayor Nee at 10:47 p•m- . RECONtlENEU: -� � The meeting was reconvened by Mayor Nee at 11:00 p.m. All Council members were � present. . � - OLD BUSINESS: � � APPOINTMENT TO HUMAN RESOURCES COf4MI5SI0N (TRBLED 11/5/79): I � :■ L l PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 1979 1 3 Page 10 MUTION by Councilwoman Moses to table this item to the �ecember 3, 1979 meetin9. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Ma§or Nee declared the rtation carried unanimously. APPOINTMENT OF NEW MEMBER TO�THE HOUSING AND REDEUELO°MENT AUTIIORITY: Mayor Nee stated he has appointed Duane Prairie as a member of the Housing and� Redeve2opment Authority and requested the Council's confirmation. (- MOTION by Counciiman Schneider to concur with the Mayor's appointment of Duane � Prairie to the Housing and Rede�elopnent Authority. Seconded by Councilman � Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 705 and adopt it on the second reading and publish. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, RFSni imnu un ,.,,, .,.__ .._. _ . MOTION by Counci7man Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 128-1979. Sewnded by Counci7woman Moses. Councilman Schneider asked if the City Attorney had reviewed this item. Mr. Herrick stated he had and could see no problem with it. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, a11 voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � . MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 129-1979, Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice.vote, a77 voting aye, hlayor Nee de- cTared the motion carried unanimously. • MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 130-1979. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice vote, a77 voting aye, Mayor Nee de- clared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Counci7woman Moses to adopt Resolution No. 131-1979, Seconded by Councilman Schneider, tlpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimous7y. MOTIDN by Counci7man Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 132-1979. 14 PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19> 1979 Page I1 Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, May� r Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 133-1979. � Seconded.by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. • MOTION 6y Councilwoman Moses to adopt Resolution No. 134-1979. Sxonded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 135-1979. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. lRESOLUTION N0. 136-1979 TD ADUERTISE FOR BIDS - POLICE VEHICLES: j Councilman Schneider asked about the costs of bidding with the County. P9r. I Brunsell, City Clerk, stated, apparently, the Police �epartment wanted to � proceed to obtain their own bids, as their specifications �iere not the same � as the County's. � ��Mr. Qureshi> City Manager, stated they have found that there is not that much j of a difference in the bids by 9oing out separately or with the County. � Mayor Nee asked that when the bids are brought back to include a statement what it rrould cost, if they were bidding through the County. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 136-1979. � Seconded 5y Gouncilwoman f4oses. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � CLAIMS: h10TI0N by Councilwoman Moses to authorize payment of Ctaims No. 30��1v Yhn9�aye> 320776. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Jpon a voice vote, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ESTIF�TES: � � MOTION by Councilman fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted. Talle, Herrick & Munns 6279 University Ave. N. E. Fridley, MN 55432 For Services Rendered as City Attorney E3,403.50 for Month of October, 1979 l_. � PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 197g ISLANDS OF PEACE PROJECT. Northern States Power Co- . P. 0. Box 9477 Mp1s., Minn. 55483 ' electric service Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.- 200 S. 5th Street Mpls., Minn. telephone service �Wilmes Edward mileage $ 25.44 S 27.06 S 15.30 Page 12 .'r $ 6I.80 declared theCmotion carriedeunanirtpusly,a �oice vote, a17 votin 9 dye, Mayor Nee LICENSES: . MOTION by Councilwoman Moses to approve the licenses as submitted and as on fi)e . in the License Clerk's Office, Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, a71 voting aye, Mayor Nee deciared the motion carried unanimously. PLA UE - COLUMBIA HEIGHTS FOOTBALL TEAM: Counciiman Fitzpatrick su Department of School Distrjc{ted the Council make a presentation to the State championshi 13 for the Columbia Heights Footbalt Team onhwlnnino proceed to obtain onePsimHlareto the�ones g�ven bn the past. ppropriate and that staff shoutd MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick�to authorize the administration to obtain a plaque for the Columbia Heights Footba7l Team, to 6e funded from the Council's contingency. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, a71 voting aye, Ma or Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, COMMUN_ r�qTI�N. Y _�� Mr. Brunsel7, City Clerk, stated this certificate of conformance certifies to the fact that the City's financial report inc7ude5 a71 the elements it s it is in the proper format and does have the introductor planations and footnotes, hould znd that Y letter and proper ex- Councilman Schneider stated he didn't realize how timited this award is and only 8 or 10 cities in Minnesota have received it. Mayor Nee su . that extended the99econgratulatjons�to�thetfinanceSStaff forerecei�a�er. of Conformance. P P The Council 9 this Certificate MOTION by Counci7man Scbneider to receive the communicati Finance Officers Association. Seconded by Councilman Bar a17 voting aye, Ma or on from the Municipal Y Nee�declared the motion carried unanlmous�y�Pon a voice vote, ADJOU-- RryMEN7: �5 lA � NOTICE f OF PUBLIC HEARING ON INDSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ' ON BEHALF OF SIMEg PUMP COMFANY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing shall ' be conducted by the City Council of the City of Fridley, � Minnesota on an industrial development project proposed to ' be undertaken by the City and Simer Pump Company, a Minnesota 1 Corporation (the "Company"), at the City Hall in said City �r on Monday, the 3rd day of December, 197g at7:30o'clock P.M. The project is proposed to consist generally of the renovation I and expansion of an existing nanufacturing facility in the City of Fridley, Minnesota and the acquisition and installation � of equipment therefor, together with any required site improvements. Under the proposal, up to approximately $�-00,000 in principal amount of Industrial Development f Revenue Bond of the City of Fridley will be issued to finance the project. A draft copy of the proposed Application to I the Minnesota Commissioner of Securities for the project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, shall be available for public inspection following this publication of notice in the office of the City Clerk, Monday throuyh Friday, except legal holidays, from 8:00 � 5:00 o'clock P.M. to and including the dateCOfehear nqto ; Dated November 5 1979. ; . BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL , � �--- {� � bM31 UnOvcrsity Av. N.E. Frldlcy, MN 55432 CI7Y OF FRIDLEY, Mlr�r� a-�soTa �.. � d. _..,. r,., u., d �.� _ FiNANCE DEPARTMEKi —�.�..,�s,Q--------- -- �..� �� • �� — -- - - —=u— � � BUSiNESS NAME: Simer_Pumo Companv -LOCATION: 5960 Ma�n S N TYPE {Partnership, etc.) Cornoration REPRESENTATIVE: _ Loren J. _Simer Jr TELEPHONE: 571-5666 (612) 571-345� 1 $ LAND S_�� BUILDING $_ s�n rxir EQUIPMENT $ �py�U OTHER $ ipp �,p TOTAL $_ 70o GC� NATURE OF BUSINE55: Manufacturina UATE: �.0/24/79 ' NISTORY OF APPLiCANT l. Have you ever ffled for bankruptcyl N9 . , 2. Have you ever defaulted on any bond or mortgage commPtment? � I3o 3. kav� you appFied for conventPonal financingl No 4. What are your futuro plarts7 We p2an ta exoand o�r total m rk f �t1�.8 �OC8t�011 tp eUnrc�ximaFet.. �en ___. ___ . _ _ _ 5• ltst financial references: ;? �`hird Nc�rthwestern NAti�nnl n t 4� t, nnP�1n AvP lan1� qSQ�S bj c) 6. Other comn�ents pertincnt to your application: We are CIITranflv -- - �°- 'n5 (Gon#:uiued on n.the� e<de! �� ING 7 ;• !s the proposed project a new facllity or expansion of an exlsting factlity? �--- - - • - �� industrial/Commerctal/Retail: _ _rndua+rial 3. Nhat is the number of new jobs estimated to become available as a result of the proposed project? _ 12 — �S G. Estlmated annual sales: 5. Potential other uses of proposed facility: �eneral Purpose Manufacturinq 6. Will this facility attract other related industries to Fridieyl 7• NI11 the proposed flnancing be.a tax-exempt mortgage, public bond sale, or prfvate bond placement? Fxnpc.rP� *n hP nr;satP bnnr� n7a�pmo + 8. what are the proposed flnancing arrangements? _p 14 T ff tn anl 7 1.....a i- --. . ._ . � ` r3 raV nl a c Date: 1Q/24/7 Slgned: (Title� �c � 1 { ,'t i i � i 6 b IOi _ _.,..... .< ., � .. ps a�9-o2 inrisbruck Villages 3rd Add. a6s� • sey� t • � �3 2 � . - �. . � . ssas a . 569, . Q . � 6St � � .. 56gS 1 �14 . . � . . ' . � ', 2 y60� . . . � � . 56� yb�� . lotl block 24 � � 5615 1 � . . . . �p 1 � � � ' 5 56�+ � � 6�, ..56,�7 66t i y'^ R6g5 1 . 6 3 SsSI 751 ; t577 b� s 5� ✓ �66 66, a6S0 a J � Il� = ls s z \ \ �a; \� �Bs 2 56 3 ..- ' � - � ` 4 545� - v 5 \ . 9 � O 1 . . � . - Sg5 •.�_ ' 7573 7575 752 � . . � � �' � �� 752�' ' ' � � i57} . .. . ..a6f3 � 153) _ Z W � � � . T SS r� i512 /579 3 4 7 t 157 � 7576 1511 - . /517 � � 2 �� - -5_ � � � ' � •s d . °' O as,S � a 1523 75? 0�� Sso 2 5 d . t J �t �533 7535 � Q,� 3 ji\ J@3' ''B4) \ -�rj ` '' _ m` d Q O n -�� @ `_ 7/_� _��! . J ... Sa. e�@ a a �8 7 � = 3 �.,� � f 4 � 9 �;�� 15�5 5606 5604 Z a 8 � to ssoa � , � sso: �. \ t�a.tn tNNSBRUCt� .. . V ' J ' ' _' Sg?S 7 4 = $ �8 ' SB?' � QB�P �` 79 � 3'a. ? SB=J 2 � � � SBZ� Pd ?1 � 3615 56}g 4 5617 � 9 5814 � t ^ O �p 21 _ 2O ' i�! d J 2 t• 9 f � a a6}3 5617 b610. 5872 m � 5605 5607 56D6 5600 a �� 22 23 � � t s 56W 5601 � 5603� 5600 1� �� ' . 3 1 I . � _ �F� m rT5 - (SSi.� r"c. iJ . � • � a � C n � �` �• o ' G w 1 i n � s b► u e k , p��° ° VI LLA GE � 0,0�5� S �o��n 5�a�a A, bIF'R il � °a � '�'-"�c�- P5 �179-02 �ql� 4Z nsbruck Villages 3rd Add. � .»�. �.. _, — � 3 A. �i �, , .� ,�,_� � `. ; '1 ;� � � ' � �;"�c„r � q � $� a .N �` i. - -..: __.�. � � N .� ,t, . `� 4 :� �� + � � _ �� ? � � : � 1� �� N �°G"y�:4�� : . - � j A . '. .�.:.,5�..;v _ �._ � // � . '" �� {� . ' 4.12 ._"" -- Ea5 �i%p n��iOi / `� \ . � d� �....'..� \` ^ �� '�� Q� � .. � � ^rM1:�� -� �� N82/�3 _ ` � 7/ i . --_ � E'�i/a,..�%��z �.. . , . Q•�� E � :' : . � � � -� _ ; ^�` o �"..� / . — � . � � �� "• _..... :. -. .� ;. w � i�. � 47. 42 �,t. ~ x O � �'j �N' �`\ 0� .. o a ._� �a � � � ��• �� S � �.� � �t ._ :..��."'�°-�.:-�. � • N C � Ni : 2o.g� � : e� � . �; � . � � p'' ' � f � � ^'e°zrk �' � \. .. .. � ►�� '`� Y � ' +. °Iv : .ea,�' � � " , ~ ` `�(� � � . ii.' N w C'� ' y�. �D � � o � ��v �. � r : 4 �. � � �� \ ' �1 O . �= i t� 4 i�•- - � � . ,p � �. ~ .\ .tiy � m n : k - i ti,) �`• zr v. ` A� ' -- ".� ' 1 � 7 :. �'�� "' ' j� �'. ti 9 - . m o/:.__ . 3 '7 � o o : � �' i � �# � - �'. � ' � ��e�i' � `� Q� 3 hp t-•� � C4 , � � YW �•' v \ y`�\ a 30 � q � Q w. � N W. ... A � v° �. w � c� � ~ . � � �/V � ° F �o, � � . .:s �-" I � V� � ��'d`� �-. . .� . . � yo " � . � n :E` ��:z,= - 3.\ � i ;._. a- ---.��.,,. -°- -- -._ �. . �.. . � .� . . � . a � ;� � ( y ._ _ a� v,... - . t-� A 0 y2. ... ` m - .._. --- .. �" o ' - v S 1 .y� ��OS.o i h .. � �� i � �� : � _ �.'- t: e'°/ _. �4iw . � 6 , � � � ; � � � �� j � � �l .M �6 92 �r..� .�..R�.�.y/;��j,�Y��l1� N[P ,"j' i (� � � < : } � "vC'LL.�-.��;.y. �� 7 \ � . p } ti�ti� " . � � ``'`� Ib • i y~' '�u. ' „� ^�?RCf' � � �,�� p�� f' �� `-)'•� �` ='�� p ' i,' ��s� Jf� /�iV • "_ � % . �°tiss ` ti A W N N � ' M dnY f' �(� 9�l 0 O. !n W D n^: �.. % N ro W O G 9 r: C C N:� n 2 r... C TY 9 n D � .`� l H��' h f 1 . ; N n � .. .j ( D �` ; ^� n h O �J � Cl 1? � . � L t . `^ f,- : � rt �'1 Y ?.w- li ' f �t : � i' . � 4 i tn � o , r_ r, " '� i ^ J'� � h . . . � [� ] �T L � i C � 1� '� :l O n F'i � ry 1� J i. 0 1 1. .: ^ Y .� � n �. J C. . �" i., L r " D _ 5 � (� • G y � • . . .. . � 1.. �l. • �l H 4 �1 ti � , \ . . � a - x .'," _ �� JJ f �.{r . � :Olirta7 � � " �! - _ � ..� .. �., � — .. � " � - � � ' - � � ovrcor / "' 1-:•: — 6700 � - R :ti ' •�'4�i � f1f-r�.� J'.n� f �o�, � 6e - ,^:' u _ .c+'� �n. .. � ' ` � ; tJ0 PARKING si�gns "` `1 . J� ' 4 _ r�� McKinley fr,orr�fr•.�',F.:si. (iaJ. p .. +f �: Mississippi_St� r�..r �..Pr.�j — , , � <. t � to; 66 z `Rwenue _ _ , - _-;. j-.�` , � . . .; t.fy � .f �..di�� - i-- - `': ' � �Pi.iS' � Ore�e.{f 1 - � ' . •;. � •y �. 4 ` i��..�.. � _ �zo� -- -' . ._..,,, : =� . ;: :isa � _.� . ' : ' ' 300 p . /:-..•i � y /�� gC �{n%t�vl3rylkr—w'f . ' / -� ��... - f' 1 � J ;... 0 I _ '� - - V ' 66�.: �ij .� 2f680� � .\-� • .- '0ZB �s 6670 � ��. . 66�5 : 3 � � •. 66bo � �p z6 665$ rrc;t;.f •� '° 2 s 6 6650 : Z� � � z3 �, S s ' 23 $ 2Z 22 � . - . 2. . .'O Z / 2A U � 20 a ., ' � 19 _ /Z` , :661yB . ��z/_ , ' .' B � $ ' its •: $� :;-� " : 66 T .. , o i $ i,.i ��27 ¢+ � + 6 :%� I .��''r�'■ . � • � � �� 60 ': � AVE. o� ; 6 3 g 5 6 54 /o /s3i-- �T . � si '`� • K 96.IZ �es2 sezt . :I2�' 13� �� Q° � %2� 3 : � 1605 161� 16Zt 463� �� se.n i n e� � . t- �66.�.t�/2,, AVE. �.E. � . , Y.F�6id�b 67 .. �lzf Ibl iiz.s .� ._ e �..�'.�/ o-`, 1 �.� � � Q �1630 771 j • ' : ��; 663er + G. � L�._: � '��O i; � i o �6 � .� � ,rz36 •!� � a266a[ �i ; �662C;� .' 't " : (� io k= �-3'O� 23z ° j -• �66�be:� � - �. . o ( �" '� m¢� � ° b61 �4 ° 3 `_<M1 �7 � � IGII +� � ��"� �6600' v'.+i ' �� :(r31l. S a . i_.� il7// :6 �, � ) ii�N , N.E E . ,_ - ,. _ a..a-�•�-II y � 4��e��a.� s .,.i, � � � ? � . S.^(1610 � . Y z � � � �$ ._ � � �� . e . mi �6� �'. st� �� V` ` l 9 b � � ° b��f � ..iei,� � �A _ Y ��\ �¢^ la.= �3 �� = 5 „� � � m 3�i! , � � a.T � 4 T %" � F'^i�'�. -� � z .. v 4��., �,�� J ` �`� .�,�. S31 � 653p m �rJ �. � � oa �S �-� c � 7,-.rn. : A ' " 6ryr�« *, Y�� 516 a i'n, � � . � o s�.� ; -�- . � � b�)? ..,,.r�6 ; B� � o � _.`—�v: �i: A{f3-L1,`��/ (�� (°�/��y.��._ —,:,--�°�=;._., ,:. ^i t� �TTT 7: IT�� 7-V V' iKkll::-i F D�i"�'1*_ �.. t . . ---�.�� ' � 4. ,,..,.�•. , - 4g � ,� � 1655 � �� 5; t695 ---�_' _ --------_. .. . .. .E � � � �RNFR il/12/79 i1NIiING LIS7 FOR INFCRf+IAL HEARING FOR NO PARKING SIGNS ON McKINLEY STREET, FROM MISSISSIPPI STREET TO 662 AVENUE N.E. {��ty Council Meeting - Monday, November 19, 1979) 7. Nronski - 1645 Mississippi Street R. Janiak - 1655 Mississippi Street R. A. Kok - 6517 McKiniey Street 'J. B. Friedland - 6526 McKinley Street M• J. Girard - 6531 McKinley Street G. L. Rognrud - 6536 McKinley 5treet S. N. Benjaminson - 6547 McKinley Street P. Ballot - 6550 McKinley Street V• B. Nyberg - 6561 McKinley Street D. Borg - 6566 McKiniey Street D. L. Anderson - 6577 McKinley 5treet A. Kirwin - 6578 McKinley Street G. T. Genosky - 1610 - 66th Avenue J, D. Luhman - 1611 - 66th Avenue J. H. F. 0. R. F. H. E. L. R. R. E. Ke W. Peterson - 6600 McKinley Street Nelson - 6610 McKinley Streei Pineault - 6620 McKinley Street Lettan, Jr, - 6621 McKinley Street Wood - 6630 McKinley Street McCue - 6631 McKinley Street Carpenter - 6640 McKinley Street J. A. Swenson - 1610 - 662 Avenue 4A � � ;�;. CITY OF �IDLEY CALL TO ORDER• Yice-chairperson Schnabel called the meeting of the November 7, 1979, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:37 P,M. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Mr. Oquist, Ms, Hughes, PSr, Treuenfels, Ms. Schnabel, Mr, Hora, Mr. Harris (arrived at 7:3g p,M,) Members Absent: none Others Present: Jerry Boardman, City Planner, Bill Deblon, Assoc. City Planner A Tn�n�� ... . _ _ MOTION by Mr. Treuenfels, seconded by Mr. Oquist to approve the Planning Coimnission minutes of October 24, 1979, as corrected. 2�1s. Hughes asked to have the word staff added in the fifth paragraph, page 14, - • . certain staff inembers . Mr. Harris noted the time the meeting stated and his arrival time should be 7:32 P,M. and 7:35 P,M, respectively, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPEgSON SCHNABEL DECLARED Tf� MpTION CARRIED UNANIMpUSLY, 1. PttRT.7c lIFADrwrn_ ...,____. THIRD ADDITION BY D ��uy��l�""x r�l' P,S, ��79_pZ I�gBRUCK VTLLAGES ARREL A. FARR DEVELOPPSENT CORPORATION; Being a replat of Lots 1-4, Block 8, Innsbruck Villages Inclusive; and 4 i2, -[he same being 5620, 5622, 5624 and 5626 West BavariantPass NoE.l' Block MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Treuenfels, to open the public hearing. IIPIANIMOUSLYE VpUBLICLHF,ARINGGOPENEDCA r7� �IS DEC7•dRRD � pIpTION CARRIED Mr. Boardman explained the building located on the plat had been built sittin �-l;lots crooked, due to an engineering mistake. Tt�e replat was necessary to allow the awnership records to coincide with the buildin g°n the replat. g• The staff had no problems with the Mr. Richard Cherrier (4206 Woodbine Lane, Mpls., Pin 55429), stated he represented tha architect firm that built the buildin the placement error. The encroachment, at�thel ostssumed the total responsibility of , was approximately 1= feet. Mr. Schnabel questioned the point on the northeast corner of the building. She thought this point was also w er the lot line. She asked if the cement slabs for the g�a$e` building were too close to the curb. Mr. Cherrier said the lot line had a jog in it to accommodate the corner she questioned. He also stated the cement slabs met city code requirements as far as placement was concerned. MOTION by Mr. Oquest, seconded bp Ms, Schnabel to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHt1IgMAN gAR�IS DELCARgD 1� �pTION CARRIED UNANIMQUSLY, PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:46 P,M. Ms• Schnabel asked if there was any thing in the new or old zoning ordinances that would pxotect the city in instances like this. She was referring to the possibility of a fine levied against a developer.if he places the building on the lot wrong. Mr. Boardman �aid he was not aware of any such ordinance. Besides, he said a mistake like this was a common building mistake, and it would not he fair to fine someone for a honest mistake. 1'1x'. Harris said that question could be discussed later. MO�ION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr, Hora, to recommend to City Council approval of L,S, ��79-02, Innsbruck Villages Third Addition. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN FIARgIS DECI,AR�D TI� �TTON CARRZED IIN+9IdIMOt7SLY, 2. PttRT.rc AF6Dri.rn_ ......___— •�� nwrus�xG: Being a replat of Lots 3 4•S• (�� V� �L��G ESTATES By 10; Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and ZO �''�° and the West half of Lot Lakeside Addition, and Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 111 in Block 2, Spring Lake Park by Osborne Road on the North, 75th Avenue on the outh, Arthur�Streetaonytheund West, and Lakeside Road on the East. iSOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr, Treuenfels to open the public hearing, IIPON A VOICE,VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAI3 �glg Dp,��ED ��ON CARRIED IJNANIMOUSLY, Mr. Boardman explained that this land was formal1 District. In the Coccprehensive Plan it was designatde xcesshpropertg �ke Park School sale. Tiie proposed plat has 42 lots. Road right-of-wa was 5 and put up for Andco Terrace Addition, which would help create the access onptokLakeside RoadCity on the of-way was also picked up Lots 23 and 22 when split. There was additional right-of-way picked up between 1559 and 1571 ? Right- be dedicated by the develo er. Sth A��enue. The rest of the needed right-of-way will already built on. P T�1e �keside Road access runs between tcao lots that are The city does have road right-of-way between these two lots, but placing the road here would be putting it 5 feet from the Road.. The homeoc�ner, 7550 Lakeside, was considering negotiations with the developer to garage located at 7520 Lakeside allow a jog in the road. This jog Would take some of that homeowner's sideyard, but he would be able to purchase or through developer's dedication acquire the land to the rear of his and create a larger backyard, 5A �B � Mr. Boardman said if the Planning Commission approves the request the staff would like to see the following stipulations: 1. Any necessary £ees required be obtained before the final plat approval. 2. Necessary road right-of-way for accessbe obtained by the developer. 3. Apprwal by the Rice Creek Watershed of the plat befo� final apprwal by the City Council, 4. A sewer and water layout be apprwed by the City staff before final plat apprwal . 5. Necessary drainage and utility easements be obtained. Mr. Harris questioned what fees would be necessary. Mr. Boardman said there was a park fee, plus an environmental development fee. The latterhas been required on 2 previous lot splits. This fee was to be used for neighbor- hood improvements, such as landscapir.g o�• possible storm sewer improvements. T►iis was presently being developed,by the City Manager's office and Mr. Boardman stated he has had some discussions with Mr. Qureshi on what the full policy was. This was a new policy to him and he did not fully understand it yet. , Mr. liarris demanded to know who star*_ed this £ee, He said the Planning Commission had not heard of this fee before and did not think Council had given approval of it. He wanted to know if this was something staff started, He questioned what previous lot splits had been required to pay it, how much the fee was and where the money went when collected. Mr. Harris said if this was money for storm sewer improvement we should call it that. Mr. Boardman siad it was not a storm sewer escrow, but a land develop�ent fee. Mr. Harris said he was very npset about ehis and �,+ould get some answers. Ms. Hughes stated there was a difference between fees that are necessary and those that are desired. Park fees are necessazy and the stipulation on fees should state what fees are required. Mr. Oquist added another way to state that would be fees that are authorized (park fees) and fees that are unauthoxized, This fee was unauthorized, Mr. Boardman explained one use would be the correction of downstream storm sewer problems, Some sort of action in the £uture to alleviate those problems will have to be taken and possibly this was what the City Manger's office had in mind. Mr. Harris said we should get the Counci.l and city attorney's opinion on this iee. He wanted to know how the city can charge £or something before the policy has been written and authorized. Mr. Boardman went on to say the staff ceuld see no development problems with the plat. The only possible one would be access on to Lakeside Road. City ordinance requires the developer to obtain access in and out of a new plat. Ms. Schnabel asked for the aerial of this neighborhood and where the homes and garages were located by the planned Lakeside Road access. Ms. Karla Blomberg, 1661 Camelot Lane came foiward. She said she was unaware of this $800.00 per lot environmental development fee until recently, She did not know how the city could arbitrarily decide on such a fee. Ms. Blomberg said she talked to the City Manager on it and did not get any answeres that could show the need for such a fee. She said her ]awyer_ was checking in to it. She asked Mr, Harris to please check into it also. Ms. Aughes asked if she would go along with the new road plan for the Lakeside Road acces s . Ms. Blomberg said she had not had time to negotiate, but thought the new plan would be o kay. She felt the road should be moved because of safety (too close to a garage) and looks. She also said the Rice Creek Watershed District was meeting on the 28th of this month to discuss the plat. She was told to�ait on any sewer and water plan until after that meeting so any conditions or reco�endations could be implemented in the plan. Mr. Harris said a final sewer and water plan would be required before the plat was given final approval. Ms. Schnabel asked if she owns this land and would be developing it. Ms. Blomberg replied a contractor, her husband and herself own the land and would be constructing cu�m built homes. Ms, Hughes noted the lot widths varied from 75 to 90 feet and wondered why they had d one this. Ms. Blomberg said the different lot widths allow homeowners to choose a lot and house Plan without having to worry about getting variances. Some house plans require a wider lot then others, It also gives less conformity to the neighborhood. Mr. Boardman said one change recommended by staff would be to switch the lot widths of Lo�s 11 and 14, Block 3, with those of Lots 12 and 13, Block 3. This would make the corner lots 85 feet wide instead of 80 feet and with the sideyard requirements, develo- ping the lots would be easier, 1�Ir. Harris asked for audience discussion. 2ir. Leo Heyne, 7550 Lakeside Road, said he was the owner of the lot which the Lakeside Rnad access would be by, Nir. geyne said he was unaware until after he bought his home that his house was placed so he had no rear yard� only sideyard. He stated he would be w illing to work out an agreement where the proposed road could jog wer onto his sideyard. He would then buy the land to the rear of his property and create a larger backyard for hi.mself. Mr, Heyne said if he purchased approximately 45 feet and with some juggling of the developer's lot lines, the plat would have the same number of lots. Mrs. Winifred Maki, 7520 Lakeside Road, said she lives on the opposite side of the pro- posed road. Her garage would be located 5 feet from the road. She expressed concern on t he water table. There was a creek bed in tl�is area and she questioned if the new cQn- •struction could cause the water tabel to ri.se. She also said she was against the street going in next to her garage because she would loose her sideyard. Mr. Oqu3st questioned what creek Mrs. Maki was referring to. �C �D Mr. Boardman said this was an underground creek bed and Comstock and Davis had been asked to determine the level of the water table and flow for this area. Mr. Greg Kline, 7612 Arthur Street, said he was concerned by the possibility of head- lights shining into homes where the proposed streets came out. He also wanted to know if the entire plat would be graded and leveled at one time and then allowed to sit until construction starts. Ms. Blomberg replied it was too expensive to level the entire area without any construc- tion commitments. They also intend to leave the land as natural and rolling as it was presently, Mr. Lloyd Dawson, 1525-75th Avenue NE, asked what type of construction would be put in the area. i�ir. Harris replied it woald be all R-1, single family dwellings. Mr. Jim Carlson, 7531 Lakeside Road, wanted to know why the street could not be brought out to the county road (Osboxne Road) instead of having an additional 40 people trying to get out by using Lakeside Road. He said the corner of Lakeside and Osborne was a vis- ually hazardous intersection already. If the road came �ut onto Osborne, perhaps the county would improve the road. This would also keep more traf£ic off of a residential street where there are kids playing. Mx'. Harris said the citg has no control wer what the county does and they were touchy about givi.ng any road accesses on their roads. Ms. Blomberg said if the road went through Lots 1-4, Block, they would loose 2 lots, plus Lot 21 would have roads on 3 sides. Mrs. John Hennes, 7600 Arthur Street, asked if the developexs would be rezoning the area at all or leaving it R-1, Mr. Blomberg said they would be leaving it R-1. Mr. Carlson asked if they would grade and £ill in the low spots and then start building. He was worried about excess dust blowing around. Mr. Blomberg said they would grade for the streets firts and then do 1 to 5 lets at a time. Mrs. Blomberg added that she could see the possibility of filling in low spots w ith fiil from the area ar.d that could cause some dusL- problems. Mrs. Karen Lennox, 7547 Lakeside Road, wanted to know if there had to be an acces on to Lakeside Road from 75Z Avenue or if there was any other tyge of access possible. Mx'. Harris said it would be difficult to place the road elsewhere. Mrs. Lennox stated it wouldn't be difficult, but expensive to the developer. She was not sure of the alternative available, but telt Mr. Carlson's suggestion of havin� an access onto Osborne Road was good. She aiso said with the numUer of homes involved, : possibly matcliing up a road with 76th or bxinging the new road back around to Arthur Street would be a solution. 5E Members of the audience who live on Arthur Street objected to the latter proposal be- s:ause all the traffic burden would be on their street. 31r. Boardman said if they matched up with 76th Avenue they would need a cul-de-sac to run down to service the south lots. City codes liroit the length that a cul-de-sac can be. Due to police and fire protection and street maintenance, city policy was ta keep away from cul-de-sacs. Ms. Hughes pointed out if a street was put in to match up with 76th, a cul-de-sac plus one more street would sti11 be needed. She wanted to knoca if there was some other alternative. Mx'. Boardman said you would have to have at least 1 or 2 cul-de-sacs then. Cul-de-sacs take up more area and the sewer and water has to be looped to service the homes. It was very expensive for the developer plus expensive for the city to maintain. Mr. Heyne said he would go along with a cul-de-sac-to service the lots in back of his property. He also pointed out the cul-de-sac that was recently built on Flanery. Mrs. Maki asked if the co�ission would recommend a cul-de-sac by their property if it meant them loosing 25 £eet of their property to a road. Mx'. Boardman said he could understand Mrs. Maki's feelings, but again stated because of development costs and maintenance casts the city wants to stay away from cul-de-sacs, Mr. Heyne said he was not convinced of the maintenance problem. He walks by the one on Flanery on his way to work each day and has never seen a snow remwal problem. Ms. Schnabel said she lives on a cul-de-sac and they have had terrible snow remwal pro- blems in the winters, The plowing was a pain and they have had to have special plows come out and either push the snow way up into their yards or into the middle of the cul- de-sac, She alao said living on a cul-de-sad was noiser because you are closer to your neighbor's home. • Mrs. Maline Fish, 7501 Lakeside Road, said she did nat like cul-de-sacs either and pro- posed the road to come back onto Arthur Street. Mr. Oquist pointed out the traffic burden would then be on only those homeowners. Ms. Schnabel asked if the developer had tried any otIier access designs. Ms. Blomberg replied they are not trying to make it difficu].t for the present homeowners They had worked with the Planning Department on the plan and this was the most feasible as far as potential development and costs. The surveyor they had contacted £elt this was the most feasible plan also, Mr. John Aennes, 7600 Arthur Street, asked about the possibility of flipping the plan. Mr. Harris said this wculd make the Lakeside Road access too ciose to Osborne Road and cauld cause a stacking problem on Laiceside Road. This would be a safety hazard. Mrs. Lennox suggested trading off the road access the city already has on Lots 21 and 22, put the road in to line up with 76th Aveaue and then re-shuffle the lot widths on Lake- side Road. Mr. Boardman said Lots 21 and 22 could not be serviced if ihey were to be split. It was asked how Lots 1 and 2 on the north end would be serviced. Mr. Harris said if these l.ots are split, a driveway easement would be requ3red across Lot 4 to service Lot 2. Ms, Blomberg agreed to that. A 25 feet driveway easement would be dedicafed for this purpose. i`�DTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr, TYeuenfels to close the public hearing. ITPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HL�ggig D�y�D �E MOTION CARRIED UNANIMO;JSLY, piJgLi� �1FARING CLOSED AT 9:p2 p,M, 2�1s. Hughes said there were other alternative solutions for the roads, but none seemed as feasible as the one presented. She felt 6ecause of the. stacking problem i£ the plan was flipped, the added cul-de-sacs and because right-of-way had already been'dedicated, this plan was the best. HoweveY, this plan would depend on if an agreement could be made between the 2 homeowners and the developer. Ms. Schnabel said unless that agreement was made, it would be hard to say what could happen. If they can't make that agreement the plan may have to be reviewed by the Planning Co�ission again. The burden was on the developer to get the needed access. She felt a recommendation could be made to the City CounciZ based on that agreement or else the Council will have to come up with some other solution. Ms. Hughes said with all the stipulations requested by staff and the agreement that was needed for road access, what was the best way to handle this request. Iir. Harris said the co:mnission had the option to deny the request, or make a recommenda- tion for approval to Council with the staff stipulations plus the access agreement. If t he access agreement was not worked out, it should come back to the co�ission. ifs. Hughes said she would like to see the recoum�endation first by the Rice Creek Water- shed District. MS- Blomberg said if the Rice Creek Watershed District required holding or retention ponds that would change the con£iguration oE the p1at. However when she did talk to t hem, they thought the plan looked okay. If recon£iguration was needed, then she would have to come back to the P2anning Co�i,ssion. Possibly they could make a recom- mendation on that possibility. Mr. Boardman suggested they pass reco�nendation to Council i£ there was no reconfiguration change. If there was a reconfiguration then it should come back to the co�ission for review. He could not see any point in ho?�ling up the plat if there was no change. He pointed out that Council could change the fi.nal plat if necessary. Mr. Harris stated that was true, but would like to see the plan go to Council as com- plete as possible, MOTION by Ms, Hughes to continue the discussion on Preliminary piat pog� ��9-03, Blomberg Estates. 5F _ . �.,.: o Chaixman Harris declared the motion failed because of a lack of a second. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by �, Treuenfels, to reconanend to City Council appxoval of proposed Preliminary Plat, P,S, �79-03, Blomberg Estates with the followi,ng stipulations: 1. Work out costs of authorized fees (park tees). 2. Work out agreement on right-of-way acquisition to provide access, 3. Rice Creek Watershed approval, 4. Sewer and water layout approval by staff. 5• Drainage and utili.ty easements around each lot be dedicated. 6. Dedication of a 25 £oot driveway easement to Lot 2, Block 2, thru Lot 4. 7- Switch the lots sizes of Lots 11 and 14, Block 3 with those of Lots 12 and 13, Block 3. $. If the plat was reconfigured, for any reason, the plat will come back to the Planning Comcuission for further review. Mr. Boardman said staff would also like to see Cleveland Street changed to Anoka Street. 1`ir. Carlson asked if Mr, Heyne and Mrs. Maki cannot reach an agreement wauld the first alternative road configuration be to line up with 76th Avenue. Mr. Harris said he m uld not say that f-or sure. t o do, was if there was any reconfiguration, the for review, What the Planning Commission ��as trying plan would come back to the comminssion UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN g�gig DECr.euuD � MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY, Mr. Boardman said the Council wi11 set a Public Hearing for this in January at their December 3, 1979 meetix�. Mr. Harris asked to have the homeowners renotified if the plan has to come back to the Planning Commission. 3. RECEIVR Ni7MdN nacn....,...,, ____.. MOTION by Mr. Treuenfels, seconded by Ms. Hughes, to receiv— � gu� Resource Cammission minutes of October 18, 1979, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN H�1Rgis DECLARgD THE I�TION CARRIED ANANIMOUSLY, Ms. Hughes said the discussion on funding Was referred to the Council, The Council had recei�ed recommendations from the Planning Cnmmission before and taad sent those reco�endations back to the Human Resource Gwmnission. She wanted to know if Planning Commission had more to say on the funding resources, She wished to discuss them more. SG PLANNING COMhiISSION MEETING NOVII�ER 7 1979 PAGE 9 Mr. Boardman said he noticed they had allowed money for a contingency fund (35% of $10,000) and wanted to know if there was money available for that fund would they. use it up on more requests or what would happen to it. Mr. Treuenfds said the other requests received totaled $6,500 and they have received nne more request and will probably get more. The money for those additional requests �ill presumably come out of the contingency fund. tls. Hughes said the request to determine the amounts came down by either the Council or the City Manager. They did not give an exact dollar amount to work with and the Human Resource Commission picked out the amount of $10,000. It was hard to give a certain percentage for each request because if the doliar aznount was different, say only $5,000, the co�ission could have ranked each request different. The commission was not given enough.information to work with. How can you give a request a percentage of an unkown amount. That was a critical question. She felt the dollar amounts alloted each request should be increase, for example to $20,000 each, plus increase the amount of the contingency fund to help fund the critical area requestS like SACA, Mr. Boardman said he had some questions and problems on that. The idea that Council a nd the City Manager's office was getting at was you have an unknown amount of dollars, and five requests. How would prioritize each request and decide what �ercentage each priority gets. If there was only $5,000 available and priority one requests $8,000, do we give them all of the money available or do we give them only a percentage of the amount available. Mr. Oquist said the percentage business was fine £or what we know today. But, was this something we go thru the first of each year. We may not know then who will be requesting Sinds and how much. Mr. Harris said he would like to see no dollar amounts, but decided on percentage figures. Does priority one get 50% of what ever amount was available. He felt there should be a cut off date on the applications so that the amounts can be budgeted into the next year's budget. He felt this was what Council was looking for. Ms. Hughes said Council got that in these minutes. The Human Resource Coiranission recom- mended 100% funding of the requests. She said Planning Co�ission should concur with that recommendation. Mx. Treuenfels said the request by KHI� was not in at the time of this meeting that decided on the other requests. Mr. Boardman said he .felt that reco�endation would be a good one to sent to Council. He also said the applications should be in by a certain cut off date so the Human Resource Co�ission can give the requests priority listing. Those priorities would be ranked however that co�ission wished, perhaps by service to the coimnunity. They then would have to give each priority a percentage. For example, priority one gets 50% of their iunds or do they get 50% of their request. Mr. Treuenfels doubted the scheme of priority one getting all the funds if funds are low and no one else getting anything, Mr. Boardman stated that was why the Human Resource Commission had to decide how to divide up the available funds. . 5I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. NOVII�ER 7, 1979 PAGE`10 Mr. Oquist said it will be known how much money there was available because these xequests will be asked for before the new budget was adopted. Ms. Hughes questioned what happens to requests that come in after the budget has been adopted. There will be money still available somehow, somewhere in the budget. 21r. Harris said he has a problem with how these request come in n�a. Hoct can the City justify to the taxpayers having a$100,000 contingency fund that-may not be used. Ms. Hughes said she could understand that point, but requests will come up later and h ow do we handle them. Mr. Harris saic! we only have so much money that we can work with. If we went to the Federal govemiment after their cut off we would be told the same thing. Mr. Boardman replied that was why a process should be set up. Right now Council was setting up a priorities list arbitrarily ou a first come first serve basis.The money has never been budgeted for these requests. Y]e need to have the Human Resource Co�ais- sion make reco�endations and set up a list. Mr. Harris said he was against slush funds. He felt it was better to have monies budgeted. Ms. Hughes xeplied the lobbying for funds should be done while the budget was being worked on and not through the Haman Resource Co�is�n. Mr. Boardman said the Human Resource Commission would be needed to set up priorities. IE the Council has a priority list, they can then determine the amount of money avail- able and needed. They could cut and add to the contingency fund as needed by this priority list. MOTION by Ms, Hughes to concurr with the recommendation to the City Council by the Human Resource Coumiission on allocation of funds to the Central Center for Family Resources ($5,000), Anoka County Senior Citizen Outreach Program ($1,000)"and SACA {$S00). Chaixman Harris declared the motion failed because of a lack of a second, Mr. Harris wanted to Imow if these requests come out of the 1980 budget. Ms. Hughes said no, Ehey should cnme out of the 1979 budget. Mr. Boardman said it would more then likely have to come out of the 1980 budget. Ms. Hughes said these requests were received in June and July and they want the money now. Mr. Oquist pointed out that if they recommended approval of the money tonight, it will -probabiy not be paid until January 2, 1980, so therefore it will be 1980 budgeted money. Steve Kline, representing Anoka County Senior Citizen's Outreach Program, said his pro- g ram placed it's request about 4 months ago and are on a very tight budget. Anyway to speed up the process to get the money would be appreciated, 5J PLANNING COMMISSION MEEfING�NOVII�ER 7, 1979 PAGE' 11 Mr. Harris said they are not sure where the money was budgeted, but would not with hold it if they had it. Ms. Schnabel asked if in 7 or 8 month these requests would need more money, where does t he money come from then. Mr. Kline said as of July, 1980, this program will be locally funded with a 50% matching Federal grant. This contribution from Fridley would be a one ti.me contribution. They have already received funds from neighboring cities. Ms. Schnagel asked how the other cities appropriated funds. Mr. Boardman said the same way we are doing it. Mr. Oquist said requests made in 1980 will have to be handled the same way they are now being handled•. Requests in 1981 will be budgeted for< However,.these programs that request funds will have to be notified so they know of the new funding Qolicy. We will have to play it by ear until budgeting starts in 1980 for the 1981 budgete If we don't have the money to give out until the budgeted money takes over, then we won't. Mr. Boardman agreed. He said what Planning Coromission will be saying was that the pre- sent requests will be paid for out of the 1980 slush fund. As of July, 1980, we will start the new policy where programs make application for budgeted money. The Human Resource Commission will then prioritize the requests and Council will then budget for Lhem. Mr. Oquist said that was what he was saying. We cannot prioxitize these requests or set a percentage on them because there was no 1980 budget for them. The Planning Co�ission recommends paying the stated amount for .each request and that was all they could do now. Ms. Hughes said the City could pay these requests before January 2, 1980 if they really want2d to. Mr. Harris wanted to know if SACA's request would be enough. He could not imagine them making their budget on only $500 until 1981. He £elt they should be contacted to see if that would be enough. Ms. Hughes said she would go and call Pat Brennen and ask her to come to the meeti.ng. Chairman Harris declared a recess at 10:08 P,M, and reconveyned at 10:25 P.M. Pat Brennen, President of the Board and Co-ordinator of SACA, said she had turned her request in last su�ner, plus she sent a letter to Mr. Qureshi and did not get a reply. Later she and Mr. Watson, also of SACA, went and saw Mr. Qureshi and were told at that time $500 was little enough for what SACA does for the cou�unity. They are still wait- ing for their money. Mr. Harris eXplained they were setting up a new progr�m which could eliminate any more funding until January 2, 1981. This $500 approved now may have to last SACA for an 18 month period and wanted to know if that amount was enough, Mrs. Brennen said she 6elieved SACA should get money from Fridley each year. Columbia Heights has donated a house plus utilities for them to use. All they pay was $40 a 5 1: PI.ANNIN6 COMFfISSION MEETING NOVII�BER 7 1979 ' PAGE 12 month for telephone service. S.�iCA serves more Fridley residents then Columbia Heights aad should help in funding. She stated they would need the $500 for 1979 and an addi- tional $500 for 1980. Tteat amount would cover the telephone service. Mr. Oquist asked if they would be notifying Central Center. Mr. Harris said no. The commission felt $5,000 was a good size contribution. Ms. Hughes said the program has started. They have had 5 state grant reviews and were Yurned down on the last one. They have been told the grant program that they wrote was too good and they are too new. They have only been in operation since August, 1979. She said they are in worse needs of funds now t-hen if they had gotten state funds. They haue been serving families in the area already. Some funding has come through Blaine, Spring Lake Park and Medtronic. Their biggest problem was getting funds for administra- tive costs and individual counseling. They plan to add one more counselor for individual counseling, but the counseling fees will pay for that, It was an expensive, but needed, aervice. The $5,000 would be used to help set up the first year of operation< Mr. Harris questioned the status of ICKICR, Mr. Treuenfels said they have asked for $3,000. But the Human Resource Cor�ission did not feel they had looked elsewhere for funding nelp and also were not sure how many people this program reached. Members of KKKK had offered to pay more than the $10 per year fee, but had been turned down by the Board of KKKK, Ae said the Human Resource Commission reco�nended to the Planniag Commission at their last meeting matching funds up to $1,500. MOTION by Mr. Treuenfels, seconded by Ms. Hughes to concur with the recommendations by the Human Resourc�:Commission to recommend to the City Council to pay the following fund requests: 1. Central Center for Family Resources 2. Anoka Cty, Sr. Citizens Outreach Program 3. SACA, change from $500 to 4. KKICK, matching funds up to 5. Contingency Fund, reduced to $5, 000 50'/, $1,000 10� $1, 000 10� $1,500 15% $1,500% 15% Ms. Hughes asked i£ percentages where incl.uded in Mr, Treuenfels motion said yes and also the contingency fund. Ms. Hughes withdrew her second. Chaixman Harris declared the motion failed because of a lack af a second, Mr. Treuenfels tMOT.ZON by Mr. Treuenfels, seconded by Ms. Heghes to concur with the recoummendations by he Human Resource Commiseion to recommend to the City Council to pay the following fund requests: Percentages are not nncluded in the motian 1, Central Center for Family Resources $5,�00 2. Anoka Cty, Sr. Citizens Outzeach Program $1 000 3. SACA, change from $500 to $1,000 4. IaCRK, matching funds up to $1 500 5. Contingency Fund, reduced to $1,500 5L $�ING COMMISSION MEETING, NOVII�ER 7, 1979 PAGE 13 3*lt, �quist questioned the time limit on KKIQZ for raising funds to receive the matching IuaYis of up to $1,500. He £elt there should be a �u� off period. He said he did not �.taow what the KKKK was and it did not seem right to him that SACA or the Sr, Citizen �ntYeach Program should only get $1,000 each. He also could not go alang with the �zation because of the contingency fund. 3�At.. 2Yeuenfels explained what KHI� was, stating it was a place £or parents and pre- $2.izbnlers to come and do activities with their children, other children and parents, �xe� use a room at the Co�niCy Education building. They did present a budget of $3L00. �IY. Eaardman sa�d if the $3,000 had been approved we would have been fimding their �ia+eire program. �rv fiquist could not see where that much funding would be required. He pninted especialiy $�.�ate they turned down additional fundi.ng by the people who use tize program, $�a� Brennen said she was on the Education Advisory Board and the funding was based an � Stp�ng co�unity need for a preschool program. This was an ungoing pmgram and she 1�,�t�e1 to see it stopped, $�. Oquist said it should get some support from the school district. $4s.. �clznabel said the program almost sounded like a day care center. II�m 76rennen said the parents are involved with the program each time their chiid aas 't�ex�. The thought was the parent was the most important teacher a child has. 34"r. �uist felt the people using this program should be able tn fund it more t}�eu tiiey ta�€�. IlQ�, �chnabel felt it seemed to touch the different areas of social work, parks and rec- �trian and education and was not sure if it was something the City shauld iund. 34Y. �3aardman stated this was were the priorities will help out. It an organizatian, �t �� helps the citizens, has looked at all aspects of tunding their program and none w1�s �vailable, then the city could help. It seemed the Ia�IZ had not iooked at all the �� yat open to them for funding, That was an important question fnr the city tD ask. '•MQTT?lN by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Ms. Schnabel to ammend the original motion to read Lhat Ki� must raise by Su1y 1, 1980, at least $1,000 to receive matchi.ng fnnd up ta $�y000 from the City. tii.'DN A VOICE VOTE, SCiII�]Lt�EL, HARRIS� HUGHES VOTING AYE: TREUENFEI,S, OQUIST� HORS VOTING 3+IAY� �iiAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION FAILED BECAUSE OF A TIE VOTE. -'h1Y. t3qnist said KI�� should not be funded until funds are shown to be needed. "dTI(�N by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr, Hora to ammend the nriginal m�tion by deleti.ng the .'KI.�:1: .allocation from the motion. �2�i 3� ��OICE VOTE, OQUIST� HUGHES, i1AItRIS� SCIINABEL� HORA VOTING AYE; T1ZE[JEI+��I,g� pOTING 1�f:4Yb GIIAZRI9AN 13AItRIS DECLARED THE MOTION C.SRRIED, 5 r7 PI.ANNING COMMISSION MECTING, P]OVi:MBER 7 1979 PAGE 14 Ms, Schnabel said KKKIC should come to the Planning Commission to answer funding questions that they have. MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Hughes, to ammend the origi.nal motion by remov?_ng the contingency fund from the motion. UPON A VOICE VOTE, OQI)IST, H[JGHES, HARRZS SCHNASEL HORA VOTING AYE; TREUENFELS VOTING NAY,' CHAIRMAN tLARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED, Ghairman Harris called for a vote on the original motion as ammended. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRNAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRED UNANIMOUSLY, MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Treuenfels to recommend to City Council that a new procedure,be set up that seates any group requesting city funds have their request in by Suly lst, of each year to allow budgeting for the next fiscal year. These requests will be turned over to the Human Resource Conrcnission for prioritization, Each request shall include a request fox a specific dollar amount, operating budget, an explanation of need, how the money will be used and other sources of funding available to the appli- cant. This program wi11 be in effect July 1, 1980. Ms. Hughes said some sort of review process should be set up so the Human Resource Commi�- aion known how the Council feels. Mr. Boardman said the Planning Commission can have staff set up a review process program. The staff could have the progxam set up around January 15, 1980 and the Planning Commis- eion could review it at that time. Ms. Schnabel pointed out that this motion states applications must be in by July 1. How do the potential applicants know of the deadl.ine. Mr. Iioardman said that will be included in the review process program to be set up by sfaff. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS D'ECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, MOTION by Ms, Schnabel, seconded by Mr, Treuenfels, to authorize the city staff to set up a xeview process program to be brought to the Planning Commission no later then January 15, 1980. The review process will i.nclude the P2anning Commission, Council and Human Resource Commission. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRI�It1N i12.RRIS AECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4, RECEIV� PUBLIC HEARIIQG NOTICE FROM SPRING LAP.E PeLRK MOTION by Ms, Schnabel, seconded by Mr, Oquist, to receive the public hearing notice from Spring Lake Park. Mr. Boardman said he believed this building was a block structure to be used for storage. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTLNG AYE� CHAIRMAN IIARItIS DECLARED TH� MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. '5� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMP,ER 7 1979 PAGE 15 5. RECEIVE ENVIRONMF;NTAL QUALITY CO�iMLSSION MZNUTPS• OCTOSER 16 1979 MOTION by Mr. Hora, seconded by Ms. Schnabel to receive the Environmental Quality Commission minutes of October 16, 1979, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRML�] tiARRIS D�CT.ARED TfiE MOTION CAP.RIED UNANIIdOUSLY, 6. R�CEIVE PARKS AND gECREATION COMf(ISSION MIA�[TTES: OCTOBER 17 1979 MOTION Uy'Ms, Hughes, seconded by Mr, Oquist to receive the Parks and Recreation Commission minutes of October 17, 1979. A questioned was noted on the date stated on page 2, 6th paragraph and also a correction noted on the time in the lst garagraph, page 4; 10:30 P.M, to 10:30 A.M, Mr. Harris said he noticed the Woodcrest Baptist Chu.rch use of public parks for their physical education needs was being discussed again. He thought this problem had been handled earlier. Ms. Hughes said there had been some discussions and some agreements made earlier, but Woodcrest was not being very cooperative. Mr. Harris asked to make sure the Parks Commission and Park Department got some type of agreement on this problem. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHEsIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THr^, M(YTZON CARRIED UNANIN�i�SLY, 7. CONTINUED: PROPOSED CHANGES TO CHAPTER 205. ZONING Mf)TION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Mr, Treaenfels to continue the discussion on proposed changes to Chapter 205. Zoning, until the Special Meeting to be he�3, Thursday, November 15, 1979, at 7:30 P,M. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AY�� CHAIRMAN iIARItIS DECLARED TIiE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, 8. OTHER BUSINESS• Mr. Boardman noted the hand out "People Building Neighborhoods"; that each member had received. He said anyone wishing to attend should get approval of their commission and notify him by December lst. Ms. Schm bel asked to have this brochure given to the Appeals Commission at their next meeting. Mr. Boardman pointed out te tha commission that the City Council at their last nieeting had set up an Energy Commission, Discussion on environmental development fees: Mr. Harris said he w wld be going either as a member of the Planning Commission or as a private citizen to the next Council meeting to get some infozmation and answers on the 50 PLANNING CODiMISSION I�PETZNG, NOVEMBER 7, 1979 PAGE 16 so called "environmental development iee". The coromission wanted to get arswers for: 1. How can a fee be implemented without authorization? 2. Were does the fee money go after collected? (General fund, slush fund, etc.) 3. What was the money used for? (future storm sewers, tree planting, etc.) . 4. Were was the written policy on this fee? Mr. Harris said when the fees and purpose of the fees were discussed and decided upon, there was no mention of this type of £ee. ADJOUI2NMENT : MOTION by Mr, Oquist, seconded by Mr. Treuenfels, to adjourn the Planning Co�ission meeting of November 7, 1979. UPON_A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE�:C'dAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 11,45 P.M, � Respectfully submitted, � D sula Long, Reco ing Secretary . 5P �< ' , P.S. #79-03 - , -,-..• •-.�.-........� Blomberg Estates .,, _ , : . :., �;?,.., , ` � �+��d�i� ' 07 )JI f1 BY))S[��f . . � . O -, . ._ ` "^ —_ r __/i33 _ . ._�... ..:. . rr � r..��. m� . n . _ i136io3aG v. �� i:i Ifl�� Jia�;i ' /oa /oo S \ Ie 96251 I .�'7' ym.�, /a��ir�i� i3o. %� vi 1i96� ' .� a 7b�'{y : xo � L � �'• }j '�i �\, : :� � � 4 c.4r/ iif'a7 � �`.i00 i. � e� B n.ron c�ir: �. i � + �768& �. 7689 '7688 a `1524 � <.i'�"� �o.:I. o\ �_ ��i> � _ .. �'� /3 m° . � �T e�� Z n o- � . ti - - .. . w � . �.1578 6jA `° � -. o� aRSS d' nc3i .� e w� vc°�� . . � ��158b 66 `� y, /5 � 7676 ,; �Q 7G77 ^ ?e�6 v 22 � 2! `�„'S 20 v � � . � . �.✓�, �'s�,' - 1437 ' /�.�a � �^ /6 3. � ., 3 "� 'Z yV � 4 ' e� � ers'2s . � a .t , � ��1. , � : � o �643 � � �1624 � �`` . � o l - 7665 '7664 � .. _ - .. � ^' . ( °>c �v` ; h 9 ;_ ,a �,k.� _�,s � ¢ q ,�, � I ^ ,�� ,� ! �r1SldY,a,�.«- ° 76s1 7650 � ��o�' �9 sxse �s�`�� `' �9 � 658 . ' � , : /¢ " 5 � �. � /B �� ° i . " 7640 ;� �bze I � Ib4 ° as _�,5,'�O 7634 i7638 •'' �639 vy<o 4 0(i�o) 6� � 3 �, .763Q m /j � . Fi �.--"__ z99s � � � ,r+o , � - � 's , „ 3 , �6ot _� f .�o ' .�T sn' .�3,Z.9 I'o�9..�� n.OZ ^7�2 N�b7 . � � - /8 � I� ..�5 .. . -��>�1��" /�j �f� w :�� 'io" v � �I ' � , 9 i 3i : � G , � � Q -itb . 't IfYq �2% � 2 .q,. Q �673 � 7bl � -� f z9v�a . �� m —r ^�7,� q�/� _: I �� i :� �� ^� � � p el � F'� 1�7 t°l�YSe` �� r � se.......^ /6 % � //d� � � � �% � � / a -� � io�:� �ii �.. ,. � � �. �� ^� � co � ' �boi �I �600 0 758t t� � ' �' �tl� � . 195 e !� /n , � �� $ so .a»f.7 ' � �sayis 30� .67 2 .6� "j� . . '�,34 � 1,�� . .'�F33 f J'.u%� n(o ,'o > F3/ ��_so IN �0 - . I . � sni 4; �ISB� � , �.� ._. 's- T iWE'-- --3-,1 � � %6 :,i . 7 � �, BAY R S'R � ,. . � � . .. . . . t .. ._ �� t49c .�. � f:n a+ . J 0 ��s '7577z' �9�-. �"� ii)z3�99��. � � 75 � S 7� w $) � �+ f � �� iS� ,^ � � 1 �1 ��L! �� O J�'/�� o a � ' � ao s�� - �: �I' ur.: � Q 7' � . . . .. ..;� r1525 z?9c ��.:s o � �� . � � 615i0 , m v I 9 � yz.z � 27 G.��j� sf f..✓/a ��,7526;.';. x� OJ ---- rT�o e a 4- �� 2 .. p 754$ ', , ,, 7 , 3 31 7 �. iDi � 0<Pf f Y ei � rFS � ` �� 6p1 \ \�c. i��j � � y� o� /.s9sl � 7fi QQ �� `°754! y Of/%�OT� Y I�SI64•� �� W � "( is �YrY 9?.Z �\ \• /� . �1 B a !• ^q n �� i . �-{'1 � . e ?50$ }� � 3 `� y z5�.. . . . w 7 /J�/b ��. u�/6�$74 1 �9,,_ 507� fo . , i�Z n �+ 6`� /�L35� � a�y . /� %520 � � �rz5 y,s �@�� o �� rnr.r w �ss� r ' `� l�aJ �,.so� Q x� �7 @, � g_ ��f 's. 1��3 145�f1t � ,s1' ' :483 �ro.rz � —t�iiD! . � 923 ^ �I�o S)�i /p��75�2 � �"�a�'�. 4:� 7 y W i\ � � ,�5�� (�� 951 r �r P >� y;b � p o� �1� . • . � 1415 a"�G��6 �,�� 4 �_ j ti,ir-b� �L �i. `� h�1 4 ' a/ �6 0 0 .. �_��.z„ � eo " � �, a,�. n /i.�� rvr � -d I . , 3 .ss - ..< 1525 1545 �� V � �i � � l": o `o( 1645 boi . , � „� c T 7� ..o (S�9 isa,r,� i��5 ISOO 7SOi^�o� ; o� iS :.. ��i--f�.-:y7--! ��° ° � , . 66 � . . OC�. ' 3� ' _. _^_�.._ ^ .... zl r ._..... .r, a .."� 23 na aaa---�� l �j B6—^-�Y� Q � (''� c �B 7a pITOR� \-� ` 15b4m 1574 1584 xf- -----:,,�-�,,,:,�.r_, ,q �030� V �VOO (fl0 �.bf ��"e1'» 40 ; S.J�.Y..0 o��19 p S GYy nf Fiid/ay McrGn I ... �. � 2`J 3��,` �"^,-'� .,, J � � Pi.di o /f i � � � Af.7.�. a m :' • ;. � � �s�� c. f,s w,��s,,,�, � °' 160 0 � ti! �� F. .3 y �:��y , q ibzo! Ib40' cn { , . 7 . . ( .r V �iSJ'la ' m 1� . e f�n . !66[� o ; � ao/ .., � ..rl o.�... � �^, �' !'� f nr � . , ._ io ��/1��7Z 7 ��' � �� n . � 0 . . —_ �� °7_f` I� �0_■— im 4��:. � • " t° />»ti'> � r (aooJ � � v � (aa) I`� 1 q 55 �—� � ° Q o '. � w rn.. .� re�,y na ' �^� (` MI I s,,; : / . } ^�.�° �� 54 \ 7/! S_�_ � .n � ��i �° v ,4�1--m '^1' '_'. J.` '� :st `�� °' �, + / :' . � ' O '� 742$ � � � bi i.o ` �...o �� 7437 .��_ '° >t �7426 ��, p ; � ;:; �r<-- ` "i� ` _ , g . err .._. i�v:cs`N.�7E6 3.,,J ; 43,' 1 � ; i I � � ; � i,l� � ---.1 I�'� � A 4� I ).e I ; � O � i �� I i II 0 zI� (! m „ ,, iy 1{ l i i� � i, I 1' a ' � I � r � ; � , . . � N �.� „_ t� ��. j�� P.S. #79-03 ' _, B1Atrt��grg i Estates ` ; ..� � � � 5Q ! r � � � ,- ° ' \ 4 • . ,.. � � u I � I ,.. : i �. __.. . . _.._'_. �� . :. �, �; � � ,- J IN � �-. i Ti N .� :�� I � � � �� I f�� i____- i -- � ' - ° Is. _ -oa � I • T� � _'__.._snno5 --i-- .... =c. I c -- 1 �' ,r,� ` �y J '! U _� ��' i:� y� :i..y. ��J �il ��3 /�v¢_ �� i �� I � ^ L?�p � � : ��.:n ` z:iin i ^Nh❑ upUC -ioz I ��Dr4 b�'��j ' ➢ I PP � Ri IJ D U fJ p � L �U Ia I � � ._ _.J_._W _.— , p � :, ...__..: _.6� _ . � �.�• �.' � f� � _ _ __ _ �... _�.-� ,>.. i�.. .-- __—_,``j1_. . -r_ _ _ �. . � '\� i � � C,.___ .J _.;�, �' ,, '� °-_ -- _ - ---'-��—T�' I .,� ; � -o �t�,,� ---- _______ _ L . n�i�: �v' . .� a, ..., ' � �°+ -.! ----��--- � ------ �I i —' � N r � _� __ . -.'�-: -- _ a N N - --� �-- �__ _ ... --- ___J � � r� �. .��r V -P - -: n `I < I; l;; w _ ___�._ __.Y'- 0` �� Grv , N �y �� v �... �� ..•..—� NBV•J1'I9'W��44 W. � , �I .. ,e, � � ... � _ nrl4'04.'�L: W•-1.1b«5' . O � __.— f_— � N W �-^ ,- v W I [- I ik i 1 I � � I ' � � — ''� " 76 t n_ Ave. � �— p� —.. _� �F I Z" a I � I � I a � •w..�l �-..NO'1C'�4'L'17� I � O ;,�`�, ` ... .� � `� 0 ,.e.e+•o: srw-n,soo I 'i.1 l � —��- �� - --_ J �q a ,a Y I � .� C' ° ' � ( .^.. �� rv � � riJ � � r,'. � p! / W �� w o0 _ a � n Q C /� .-sev'os iv'[ � �ei.oe' : laV2. I (� : u Tl-__ � l � � p I . U �*I O � I U' . E I '� � --_._----� � . , � I 1 I ~ �ra I d ,I �_� �_ J _ ----_----___.-�;•�,r�, /1ve. NL. �-------- -�------- �— �� r_____ Funding Requests HUMAN RESOURCF.S CGP'AIISSION MEETING OCTOBER 18, 1979 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Peter Treuenfels called the October 18, 1979, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7;32 p,m, ROLL CALL: Members Present: Peter Treuenfels, Mary van Dan, Wayne Saunders Members Absent: Marlyis Carpenter Others Present: Peter Fleming, Administrative Assistant Lee Carlson, Central Center for Family Resources Barbara Hughes, }arks & Recreation Coumiission Chairperson APPROVAL OF AUGUST 2 1979 ilUMAN RESOURCES CONL+1ISSi0i� MIN[1TES: , MOTION by Ms. van Dan, seconded by Mr. Saunders, to approve the August 2, 1979, Human Resources Commission minutes, iTpon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Treuenfels declared the motion carried unanimously. 1. [�7�1 Mr. Treuenfels stated that he had been unable to contact Kathy Robson and Jaime Becker was ill. 2.. RECEIVE MEMO FROM NASIM 1979 Ms. Hughes stated that she was very interested in the allocation of monies to organizations and ti:at was one of the reasons she was at the meeting. !_ At the meeting, the Commission would be voting on monies to l� allocaCed to several organizations, one of which is the Central Center for Family Resources which is now functioning in Spring Lake Park. She felt human resources was probably one of the most important resources in this community. She liked the idea of the preventative aspects of the C�ntral Center for Family Resources' program. She stated she was both irritated and disappointed that something had not been done on that project thus far. The Planning Commission had recommended the funding to City Council, and the City Cauncil had passed it back with no guidelines or guidance and no indication of what kinds of monies are available for helping community groups. She stated that the Planning Commission had asked several times for firm figures on the monies available. She stated that this was putting a terrible burden on the Auman Resources Commission. �R � � S HUMAN RESOURCES COhQ1ISSI0N MEETING OCTOBER 18 1979 - PAGE 2 Ms. Hughes stated that there was no obligatioa on the Commission's part to put these funding requests in numerical order. She thought that Was a difficult proposition. Ms. Hughes stated that of the organizations that had been funded in the past, the Central Center for Family Resources seemed like a good one and one that the people of Fridley were in need of and a service that was nice to have close. She stated she knew some of the people involved in the program, so it was well run, and they were doing everything they could to get funding. It is very dif£icult to get funding for new projects, and they were doing remarkably well in obtaining funding, including some funding from local businesses and neigh- boring communities. While the functions the Center is performing may belong somewhere else, these functions are not being provided anywhere else at this point and need to be. Ms. Hughes stated she would encourage the Human Resources Coamission to do what they can in terms of funding worthy groups. Mr. Treuenfels stated the Commi�sion had four requests to consider: 1 2 3 4 Central Center for Family Resources -$5,000 Anoka County Senior Citizen Outreach Program -$1,000 Southern Anoka Community Assistance - $500 KKKK (Koping wit-h Kids from Kradle to Kindergartea) - ao formal funding request Ms. van Dan stated that in Mr. Qu:eshi's letter, Mr. Qureshi was suggesting that the Commission prioritize the funding requests by percentage. She stated that if the Commission did not know the funds available - the funding base - how could they determine the percentages? Ms. van Dan stated that at a previous meeting, she had expressed a strong feeling in favor of giving the total amount requested ($5,000) to the Centsal Center for Family Resources. She also believed that they had to do everything possible to save their human resources,and preventltive medicine was her chief interest. She could net think of any better way than starting with the young. She was in favor of every program offered by this or.ganization and could noc see where these programs were handled by any other groups within the County. Mr. Trevenfels asked Ms. Carlson what percentage of the Center's clients were coming from Fridley? Ms. Carlson stated she coul,d give some exact figures, keeping in mind that the Center officially opened its doors to counseling services on August 20th and began running parenting programs on October 2. They have 28 people presently participating in the parenting sessions, which is the maximum amount of people they can handle in two classes. The evening class has 5 people from Fridley. She was not sure about the morning class. ST HUMAN RESOURCES COMMIISSION MEETZNG OCTO�ER 18 1979 - PAGE 3 Ms. Carlson stated that they puUlicized the Center's programs through the recreation bulletins in Blaine and Spring Lake Park, but were not able to use the Fridley community newsl.etter. Since they did not get the same distribution in Fridley, she did not know if they could count the 5 people as a totally accurate representation or future predictor. In terms bf the counseling services, they are presently working �oith 20 families. She thought 4 of those families were Fridley families. She stated that in the short time they have been in operation, the demand has been evident. The in-service was done in Fridley and in the Anoka County system, as well as in Blaine and Spring Lake Park areas, and referrals were coming in from all different sources. Mr. Saunders asked Ms. Carlson where their referrals come from? Ms. Carlson stated they were getting referrals from the County, elementary schools through principals, and also have referrals through the police depart- ments. Ms. Carlson stated she wanted to stress that the communities were represented on their boards, and these representatives were listened to so each community had input and controls in terms of the Center's direction. The Commission members tharked Ms. Carlson for coming to the meeting and for answering their questions. Mr. Treuenfels stated that the Commission should look at the needs of each of the organizations and how they are being met from various sources of funding. How much of it is up to the City of Fridley to supply that funding as compared to other sources of f.unding? The Cammission should try to get some idea as to how many people are being reached and helped by the various programs, Ms. Carlson was able to give some indication as to how many Fridley people are being helped. Mr. Saunders stated that when you consider the family size and the people involved in this kind of thing, $5,000 was a fairl}: small figure. He would assume that as the Center grew, probably the dollars per family would lessen rather than expand. He felt best qualified to vote on the request from the Central Center for Family Resources Uecause of their earlier presentation and that it was highly recommended at that time. He stated he was in favor of funding it and giving the Cen*_er a chance, especially for one year, and after one year the Co�nission could take another look at what was accomplished. A. Request for $5,000 for Central Center for 'ramil Resources MOTION BY MR, SAUNDERS SECONDED BY MS, VI�N DAN TO RECOAIMEND TO CITY COIIbTCIL, THROIIGH PLANnING CC�PffS5I0N TI1AT THE CITY 0� FRIDLE] FUND A$5,000 CONTRIBUT70N TO TI11? CliNTRAL CBNTER FOP. FAMILY R�SOURCES, UPON R VOICE VOTE, S:�Wi DSRS AND' V�'aN ll4N VpTING AYE TI:EUENF'ELS VOTING NA� CHAZRPF.RSON TREiI�NFELS DECLARED TIIE DSOTION CARRIED. HUMAN RESOURCES COtiMLSSION MEETING OCTOBER 18 1979 - PAGE 4 B. Request for $1 000 b Anoka County Senior Citizen Outreach Program A motion was made on page 3 of the August 2, 1979, Human Resources Co�ission minutes recommending to City Council that the City of Fridley fund a$1,000 contribution to the Anoka County Senior Citizen Outreach Program. C. Request for $500 b Southern Anoka Co�unity Assistance MOTION .1 THE M5. VAN DAN, SECONDED BY SAUIVDERS, TO RECO.II�ND ON, THAT THE CITY OF F'. D. KKKK (KopinQ with Kids from Kradle to Kindergarten) Mr. Treuenfels stated he had received this information that evening for the Commission's consideraticn, but no dollar figure had been requested. MOTION by Ms, van Dan, seconded by Mr. Saunders, to table this item. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Treuenfals declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Treuenfels stated that Mr. Qureshi had requested in his memo of August 9, 1979, that the Human Resources Commission prioritize these funding requests by percentage. It was the concensus of the Commission members that, assuming the base doilar amount is $10,000, the following percentages wi11 apply. If a lar.ger funding base is available, then these dollar amounts are to be funded and the rest is to go into a contingency fund. Central Center for Family Resources Anoka County Citizen Outreach Program Southern Anoka Community Assistance Contingency fund ADJCURNr1ENT• Sd'/, $S,OQO 1 CPi', 1, 000 5% 500 35% 3,500 $10,000 MOTION by Mr. Saunders, seconded by Ms, van Dan, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Treuenfels declared.the October 18, 1479, Human Resources Co�nission meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m, Respectfully sub itted, �i"1t �-,�i.;.L °. , Y1nI. d`e Saba ' Recording Secretary � 5U 5 �•! APPEALS COMhIISSION M�ETIIv?G, NOV�ER 13, 1979 PAGE 2 B. STATED HARDSHIP: 4b change the Texaco sign to Sinclair would be changing the actual sian only and using the same poles. It would be a waste of tine and money not to use the same structure. . C. ADIdINISTRATIVE STAFF RGVZEW: We recommPnd that the Pppeals Cor.mmission give serious thought co either denial of this request or if approval is recoromended, tti�n the allowable size of these types of signs should be reconsider.ed. We do not feel that financi.al costs should be a conaideration for z�ariance to the size of a sign. Mr. Moravetz said staff had no further coffinents. Mr. Peugh, representing Signcrafter, Inc., came forward. Iie explained the sign w axld be 5 feet x 32 feet and placed on the �isting poles. All other signs such as, "we give full service" and "Firestone" would be remove3, fIe said the larger sign would be needed to attract customers to the gas station. There was no direct exit from University Avenue to the station and customers have to use the service road, Mr> Plemel asked if there would be any signs on the building, Mr. Peugh said no. Sinclair was trying to clean up the looks af the building. Ms. Gabel questioned if there would be a price sign and it's sizeo Mr. Peugh replied yes and the size would be no larger than 5£eet x 5 ieet, It was asked if any other size sign could be used. Mr. Peugh said the next sizes are 6 feee x 10 feet or 5 feet x 7 feet. These signs have been pre-fabricated and if they could not use the size requested a new one would have to be made. MOTIOI+I by Mr, Plemel, seconded Uy Mr. Barna to receive the letter from Mr. Harvey Eiler, 3316-42nd Avenue So., Mpls., stating he was in favox o£ the sign. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON GABEL DEC7.ARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY, It was decided Mr. Eiler must have preperty in the area. Mr. Barna stated if the next size sign was used the present poles could not be used. He �Lso questioned if the proposed sign caas the same used on a freewxy. Mx. Peugh said it was the size they use on a busy road. Iie also staCed it would be an added expense to remove and replace the existing poles. Sinchir would like to use what ti�ey purchased Sn APPEALS COMhIISSION MEETING NOV II4SBER 13 1979 PAGE 3 MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Plemel to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSOtd GABEL DECLARED TI3E MOTION CA&RIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLZC iIEARING CLOSED AT 7:50 P.M. Ms. Gabel said the sign ordinance was just re-written and the citizens had decided the largest sign area they wanted was 80 square feet. This sign was twice that amount. Mr. Plemel felt there were too many signs on University Avenue in this area already and doubling the allowed sign size was flagrant of the citizen's desires. He also stated the speed limit was only 45 mph, the station was located on the corner, therefore the size should not make that muc}i difference in attracting clients. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna to recoimnend to City Council denial of Variance Request to increase the squaze footage of a free standing sign from the . � ._. m�cimum of 80 square feet to 160 square feet, located at 6071 University Avenue NE., because af the following reasons: 1. The size requested was twice the amount allowed by the sign ordinance. 2. Going against the ordinance o�ould be a flagrant disregard of what the citizens desired for the coffinunity. • 3. Monetary costs should not be consi'_ered a hardship. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPEitSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated this will go before the City Council at their December 17, 1979 meeting. 2. VARIAA'CE REQUEST PURSUANT TO MIrTTESOTA HEALTH DEPT, WELL CODE, TO ALLOW TIiE INSTALLATION OF A PRIVATE SEWER SYSTr"T, i 65 FEET FRO?�1 �"-, SILr,LLOW WELL INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 100 FEET, ON PART OF OUTLOT C, R�GISTERED LAND SUAVEY d�3, THE SAME noiTln Go/.n c'rt�nnml[� iAwr2� T1c� /n_,...,...a t�� n...�a.,�.� A C�.'.�.L IaGC Il..t�.�....... D,....1 AiC MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Plemel to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIM6IUSLY. PUBLIC IIEARING OPENED AT 7:55 P.M. Vice�chairperson Gzbel read the staff report: ADMINISTR}1TIVE STAFF REPORT 6540 Sievert's Lane N.S. A. PUf3LIr PUitF'OSE SERI/�D BY RF9UIREi•SF,NT: Minnesota flealth A partment S4e11 Code, Chapter 217, Cl, ff, requires that private wells less thaz 50 feet deep and not penetrating 10 feet of clay must be 100 feet away from a private sewer system. 1 � 7 � C� ,� y � � i i� �: 1i �� i� j -. L � . . . ,., . .. __, 5 Y - Variance request - sign ; ��-�OC�F____��_ . 6071 University Ave. ..j� �,_ Y .~ . � Charles D. Peugh, Signcraf�e'rs ��., �� : . ! � ' �r �� _ � __ (� .f . iti` .' ; Y i � 7 •� . , , - , . � . ' -•. � .�^- « t � . ' ., -: . "\�: � r i ' 3 . i � . � - .. : � � �, � . . _.. ..' . ._ - •�� i :-< � �' _^ � '� .� � . . �. , �' �Y.0 I:.SI � .. I . ' . - < � �- � :u.i.�._„ _ .. . ..__ , _ _ �• � ^' ) . 1 ) 'r ..`i-- � " • _.0 � .. ' ' ' . . . ' � . �. � .. -. .. .. : . _ . _ .._ _ 1 6�. S 7 A.VG N E '� e , _ i�__ ��. . ti%; �.j' _ .. � �� _.i'y.__ ' '_' _'_ -.r � . - .�. �,' � - 1 . � ... _ ..:-.r.— . .1,�- .�. , . _ � ... . . _ _ ' ' - .: . , _ y �.' ..-- '' _ .. —y 1 j . -.� :.� :y�_ " .s.-: ' �� i _ � �. _ _ ' t "' _ y. �/ �i.. � ', - .- t >y-' .�j` '_._.__ � ' /I _' �_F�r�i�nid�ri :�r �+3rrc'i �'• Y `t `. .�,. } .. �} � . � F: � � ��' � � '; ' �, Y� ,� � \'• \\ \•.\��} i \ t\ '.� I � - .. '. . .. },`' . � II�• i �\\*�� \\\ l\. �,� '�':c �.• � - � • ) ; � 4 ; ` �� \ \• � �r�' ` � Y::`� � �: . � . ' � � : � � � t _t ;t „ � —�_-- a � , �� ; � 1-� � � F 4 r--- �..,I . .- . � � �{ � .� ? � ��\\\� �\ \' �: . �( � � t 1 � � 1 �� .1 jr � \'J \ j�� :\ i � 1 qi ' Q � 1 �. �G . , . �! . � � 1 - �� ' \ \i V \ v � Z � ... � � � : ' i � . � ! J � \ ` \ 1 � \ \ � � . � � �, . ! . L'--J L----- �� i"��t�\ � ix. � . `� r .. �' �' . � �i � � .aS �� .\\\�\ � ��\�,\� .j � , �l, �; y 'i ; �: �� ,;�..,.� �,. j : ±.. f � � ,� : �� . �� ) \ � i r ( �3 .. � . . �� . � . � i � ^•� • � \ �i� \� ��s`l �� ] . . . 11 h L � ''"'_._�_-_ � � _ j +T .. � /� � r'...,. ,� � . . �: . . t / , - t' _ ' , �•� e� ��'"� '� � _ �! ' + t ' /'",I ` :•� � }• ` - � t� � u �. � � � •• ��_ . ' � �. •Sv }� . j! . •� ,. � J '_'-1. . _-, `_`_ „ � � � s� � fl' -. / �/ .r . r_ _ . d � �1 1 �� . a � i � ' -! � } � , . ` ✓ ' ,-� �J � Q, cr a v . �'' .: ; � .S=�Y' � -- � • , �� `� t � R � i . i�f .. ....�r . . � - . . .� y i7 �,;' c. ;i . f , 1 f ' , . �� — _..�� . . x ._ cs � o o a �� ?� i i , � � - ar . � . � �h. rrS � � C �; . ;; i� r� 1 4 f; � � � � � ;� %;• .� ; 5 ':'� ` � '/" . ) ic F ' �, r � � i. �� i � , � i '••y � � �^ �. .' .'- C� . . . `{ S*" ♦•1 � 1 � . . ( � . . . . . , - � . � � :r�� ''i L J _. } ... . I � I ` � _ �t � q � a i: e �� * �- Q Q W W � � -1i Q ¢ � Q O � -.! � CJ V J W � Q Z � `= ' 4j �Y Q J W U � Q Q O � 9 4� W < S � f�n •J Q� � � e W � am , W v U � �.a a ti �U ti � W � o w 4� � � (] � 11 t. „ �. w w w � � �. Q � e .. N O�" 2 v <- J� C R ` e � t�i 4 w � �' � �%1 � � � Q � W U � Z Q P ` � � x � � �t 1 1�-- �. C ` i' � ' 4�i � �� o � , � � � J � �`,� � - ` � ' �l � ��.� Variance request - sign � 6071 University Ave. Charles D. Peugh, Signcrafters ' ,� . .�:.:.i:` T�� _ � :- _ _ .__ ._ , ., ,.. �.; � .� -� r � jr� �" Ml��'--� r:;i� yi ' �rv=o �`b'�i <<as._ ---r--� ! ..#rs ..y�•� ...__..:'; '�.- 1_,-'. i—i °��.:�: '__ ^,'= C.."3w.w�.. _ . .. � ^• +�a. �+ +' » _ , �� s3Y+,'�"'' .��. . .. c..',� , _ .. .�- .,.,�. .� ..,,,.�-^`_ , . . ��_ " __ — r" _ _ .. � ._.i .. . . �-� .--�EXA_p -� .�. yjer,�'�"b""."'"�N'_.�Tf'�� 1,v.±,�,�Ay -. `-'�'q�y��,y+.... .i� S. '��,. t��4� �'e.,r'� t"P? r _ ,.� ;y- . .. a {A,M, ;; ; +�� „� f � `: - ..._ . .:.;. ' — ' �c, .. � ...—�--- ---�— -. 5Z I - ' I - 3� " ' I r . I . . �_ . . .- .:..-. . ' , . \ � `.. . . . .. � .� �. . � . ,_ - �.. .. - . s. : . . :' � . �. . -�'�. . ' . . '\ ...,. . . ' , . � . i �:' � .�f , , 1. CATV CO'�7"�iIS5I0N ''.7E:.TING� OCTOB�:,�'� 24, 1979 CALL TO OR7ER Chairman Kaspszak called the meeting to order at 7i1$.P.�I. ROLL CALL :d�ViBERS PRESENT: ME'�IBERS ABSBNT: OTHERS PRESENT: Ed Kaspszak, Harold Belgum, Larry Chevalier, Carolyn Blanding Burt Weaver Clyde �foravetz, City o£ Fridley John Bddy, General Television APPROV3 CATV CD;�li:�ISSION 'lIZNUT;:S: OCTO�;:R 11. 19i9_ ` s ;vir. Kaspszak 9,uestioned :v1r. 5toravetz if he had gotten a clarification on when the $ja becomes effective, as per the minutes of October il, page 3? i�r. ��Ioravetz stated that it becomes effective IQovember 1, 197S• Mr. Kaspszak stated that regarding the fifth paragraph on page 7, of the Qctober ilth minutes, i.t should read that :.Zayor Nee stated a$7.�0 connection charge, with the word free deleted. '�ftOTION by `�Tr. Chevalier, seconde@ by ;s. Blanding to approve the October 11, 1979 minutes as correctec. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Kaspszak stated the motion passed unani�ously. A. Rates (Copyri�ht Fees and/or itovalties) �ir. Y�foravetz stated. that tilr. Verg Herrick had looked at this + amendment, and had just rephrased it to use diiferent wording, than the Company had written it. :�Zr. Belgum questioned as to what are the charices that these copy- right and/or Royalty fees might increase in the future? �Ir. Eddy stated that from past experience he would say that the increases if any would be minimal. :�r. Kasgszak stated that since this charge 4vi11 appear in a separate column on �;he billing statement to the customer, he wondered if the Commission ielt that this should be part of the oz�dinance, or just an infor!nal agreement �a•ith the Company? He further stated that this informal agreement vrould be that it ivould be a se�arate charge so listed on the customer billing, secor�dly, that the Company would keep the Commission informed �zd abreast of any new, and further royalty/copyright fees, that ;vould be coming in the future. OCTOBER 24, 1974 CATV CO',4'1ISSION b7EETING Pa�e 2 :Kr. Chevalier stated that due to the fact that this is a minimal amount of money, that he felt that it would no�t warrant any restrictions. He stated that he would just have an informal agreer�ent that the Company would inform the Commission of any further future increases, or changes in these fees. Pflr. Kaspszak suggested to :�r. Eddy that as �ast of his six month report to the City and Commission he could at that time mention i£ there is any changes in these fee's. .� �tOTION byi�ir. Chevalier, seconded by 3ir. Belgum to accept, and approve the proposed amendment 405.22 as written. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Chairman KaspszaY declared that the motion had passed unanimously. (See attached proposed CATV Ordinance amendments). B. Installation Costs Mr. 'doravetz stated that the staff viewpoint is, that they did not consider this charge of �25.00 too high in view o£ what other utilities charge. He £urther stated that he felt that a$2�.00 charge was much more realistic, than a$7.50 charge. ;�ir. Kaspszak questioned if yTr. Eddy knew what itilinneapolis' Cable- vision's proposed charge was to be? Mr. Eddy stated that he did not know, but tha't Bloomington's charge is $20.00 and St. Louis ParY.'s charge is $2�.00 ?�ir. Kaspszak questioned as to what specifically covers Senior Citizens rates? P�Ir. ',Soravetz, and ^,1r. Eddy stated that the,y felt that this was covered somewhere else in the Ordinance. F�Ir. Yforovetz stated that there was coverage on the rates in the ordinance that stated that Senior's would pay 25J of the monthly rate if they were 65 years of age or an income of less than $�,OOQ.00 °�Ir. Kaspszak questioned ":1r. Eddy, as to how many senior citizens installations the Company has? ;`rlr. Eddy stated that they get a hard copy back from their computer company, and on this co�y they have broken it down to see how many senior citizens receive the rate reductions. He further stated that according to that they have 17 seniors receiving the reduction. Mr. Kaspszak stated that he felt that they should have some wording to include a reduced rate for senior citizens, in that he felt that the �'�Sayor had i;he view that it would be difficult to approve a increase in installatioi: r.ates without specific reasons ior the increase. He further stated that he felt that without any cover- age for a reduction for senior's that Tayor Nee may have a mare difficult time approving this. He stated that he would have to OCTOBER 24 1979 CATV CO'>1'iISSION 'dEETING Pa�e 3 say that he also felt this way. 'dr. Chevalier stated that he felt that as an advisory Commission, he felt that they should make their recommendations without taking what the mayor might or might not do to the recommendation, into consideration. �Ir. Kaspszak stated that yes they should, but that in a past experience, he felt that a Commission could spend aany houxs and much time meeting only to send a recommendation to the City Council. and then have them dispense with it in a short time, because it ran contrary to their feelings. He felt that if there were to be problems with the Council, or the :iayor that now was the time to be aware of them and deal with them now. Mr. Belgum questioned fdr. Eddy as to if they have any projections as to how many senior citizen's there are now in Fridley, and how many to expect in five years, and ten years etc.? Ivir. Eddy stated that no they do not have any projection fia res on this. ;�ir. Kaspszak stated that he would like to see wording that would state that a senior citizen, age 6$ or over, was not charged in excess of �7.j0 for an installation fee. ?�lOTION by'.4r. Chevalier, seconded by +.s. Bland:.ng to approve the amendment ,�405.211 with the additi ari of the staiement for ser.ior citizens age 65 and over, not to exceed 7.SQ dollar installation fee. Upon a voice vote, all votir.g aye, Chairman Kaspszak declared the motion had passed unanimously.(See attached Ordinance amendments)� D'Ir. Kaspszak stated to ��Zr. Eddy that at sometim,e, they are going to ask for a list of senior citizen insta?latior_s, and they are going to call them and ask them if they are received the reduced installation rate. 7.4r. Kaspszak stated that it was a matter of them just asking the person if they are a senior citizen vrhen they oall in for installation. �Ir. Eddy stated that he wanted the Commission aware that there are discrimination laws that may cause a problem on this, and that he would want the Conpany's legal department to look at it. Mr. Belgum stated that this could be included in the material that is mailed out, stating that there is a senior rate for installatian, at a reduced rate. Mr. Eddy stated that they may be able to try that in the mailings, but that he didn't feel that he would want to ask subscribers over the phone their age. �� ti7r. Kaspszak stated that with the feeling of the Council, and his feeling, that if in a year from now there is violation of the ordinance, he would be very hard on the Coiapany for that violation. OCTOBER 24. 19�9 CATV CO'dMISSION 57EETING Pa�e 4 6 C MOTION by ;�1s. Blanding seconded by ;,4r. Belgum to delete any refer- ence made to income, so that ordinance 405.222 {6) reads "to quality for the senior citizen rate, a person must be age 65 or over." Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Kaspszak stated the motion had passed unanimously. (See atteched Ordinance Amendments). ilfOTION by �.1s. Blanding seconded by i+ir. Chevalier to approve 40$.211 as amended. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Kaspszak dec2ared the motion passed unanimously. {See Attached Ordiance Amendments}. 2. OTHER BUSIN�SSa Mr. G7oravetz stated that due to previous changes in the amendments to the ordinance, and the change in the Company's fiscal year, that the reports required that they be filed for February, April, and August, which he felt were redundant. He further stated that he felt the Commission may want ta look at changing them from February 1st, to April 1st, and change irom August lst, to October lst, for the requirement of the Ccmpany to furnish the City with a business report. He stated that then it could be incorporated vrith the semi-annual reports the Comiaission give the City. A40TION by ?�Ir. Belgum, seconded by Nir. Chevalier, to arnend section D.2 of the ordinance, the last paragraph, striking the dates of February lst, and August lst, a,"id inserting the dates of April 1st, and October 1st, as the deadline for submittal of the business reports by the Cable Operator. IIpon a voice voie, all voting ave, Chairman KaspGZalt declared the motion passed unanimously. (See &�tached. Orinar.ce P.me�d.�a��G�sy RZr. `loravetz stated that as requested all the Commission members received a list of ihe Commission members, and the dates of which their term expires. He further staied that after some research, he has detero:ined that no other Comr.,ission has the restriction as the CATV Commission does in Article IV of their by-laws, regarding a limit of terms a member may serv•a. T�70TI0[1 by ':Tr. Belgum, seconded by ^�1r. Chevalier, to amend article of the adopted By-Laws of the CATV Coirunission to include the stipulation that members be residents of Fridley, so that the firs't �entence reads, "There shall be five members, all of which �hall be Fridley residents, appointed to tnis Commission by the :it;ridley City Council." Upon a voice vote, ali voting aye, Chair- ian Kaspszak declared the motion passed unanimously. (�ee attached 3y-laws Amendment). , 610TION by 51r. Belgum seconded by ,:ir. Ghevalier, to amend article IV of the adopted By-Laws of the CAiV Co;nmission, to delete the last sentence that reads, "However, no Comn?issionar shall be appointed to more than two succeeding terms.", with the clarifying statement that this conforms with other Coms,issions, in tha� they have no such restriction. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairman Kasp�zak declared the �otion passed unanimously. (See attacIzed By laws Amendment). CATV COMMISSION APPROVED PROPOSED CATV ORDINANCE AMENDM[NTS 405.22 Rates Rates charged by the company for monthly service hereun�er shall reasonable and designed to meet all necessary costs of service, fair rate of return on the original cost, less depreciation, of devoted to such service (without regard to any subsequent sale c price or cost of such properties). Idaximum rates shall 6e set f tion and maintenance of a CATV system as fair and reasonable und conditions in connection with the rights granted herein, and sai proved by the Council. collect ee or 405011. Installation amoun be fair and including a the properties r transfer or the opera- er existing d rates be ap- ntallv i or rovaities. lo Single.Family Dwel7ing, Multiple Family Dwel7ing, Commercial, Mobile Homes. First Connection -�e�-�e-exeee�-��:b8-epe-��e-€ee. Not to exceed $25.00 one time fee. For senior citizens, age 65 or over, not to exceed 7 50 one time fee. Second Connection - Gratis if installed at time of first installation. Additional Connections - Time and material cost of the company in making the installation(s), however, �a�-Es-exeee�-$�:68-�ew-#pe�a}}a��ep. not to ex- ceed �25.00 er installatione For senior citizens, age 65 or over, not to ex- ceed 7.50 per installation. 2. The company hereby agrees to waive all cor.nection charges for Single Fami- ly Dvrellings, Multiple Family Dtaellings, Commercial Establishments and Mobile Home Parks if the connection is performed during the initial construction of the CATV system within the City. 3. In addition the regular connection fee may be�waived or reduced during certain sales campaigns the campany may wish to conduct during the year. 4. Schools, Libraries, City Offices and Other Public Buildings. There shall be no charge for installation in each school building, library, City office or other public building in the City, except when said installa- tion per building exceeds one, in which case the charge shall be at cost (ree� �e-exeee�-��;5B-pew-eep�ee��ep). (not to exceed $25,00 per connection). 405.222. Monthly Service Charge 6. 5enior Citizen Rate: Upon app]ication the monthly service cliarge for subscribers, 65 years of age or older, shall be reduced by 25% of the regular monthly rate charged other subscribers. In order to be eligible for this reduced rate, the owner of the home, or if owned in joint tenancy, one of the owners of the home must have attained the age of 65 years. When persons are renting property, at least one of the tenants responsible for paying the rent shall have attained the age of 65 years to qualify for the senior citizen rate. �be-ee��pe�-eawne�-a��-ap- eaw�e�-��ee�e-e€-�be-�ewse�-eY-�e�sews-�#vtng-�p-�be-beasehe��-f�ep�e�-ew ewnn�}-e�a}}-�et-exceed-�5;B08-per-qear-tn-order-to°qQe�Tfp-for-the-sertTar e}E�se�_waEe. Proof of age ap�-#Nee�e satisfactory to the company shall be , page two CATV COMMISSI01� APPROVED PROPOSED CATV ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS 6. Senior Citizen Rate (continued): required prior to receivin9 the senior citizen rate for monthly cable service. 405.28. Cable Television Commission (last paragraph) The company shall furnish the Commission with business reparts on or before Fe�raawy-}s� April lst and Aa�as�-�s� October lst advising the Commission on: progress made in installation of the system, utilization of channels; program schedules; neo-r services planned; and an annua] projection, i.e. business plan for the forthcoming year. Specific form and frequency of reports shall be specified in a memorandum of understanding between the City arid the companyo The Commission shail review the accomplishments of t,j�e company and determine if progress is consisten� with the company's projectionso The Commission shall issue reports, at least semi-annually to the residents of the City. PROPOSED CATV BY-LAWS AMENDMENT Artir.le IV There shall be five members, all of which shall be Frid}av residents, appoint- ed to this Commission by the Fridley City Councilo Appointments shall be made in accordance with provisions of Section 28 of the Cable Teievision Franchise Ordinance. Hewevep;-�e�ee��#ss�oae�-sfaa��-�e-a��e#��ed-�e-�;e�e-Ebap-�sve-sae- eeed}pQ-�epx�s. Respectfully submitted, ` `) ,,�� /��/'�v'' CLYD V. MORAVETZ Staff Representative to the Cable Television Commission CUM:ik Note: The underlined reflects new verbage. Crossed out and regular type reflects existing verbage of ordinance. GF .. % T0: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL DATE: NOVEMBER 29, 197° SUBJ$CT: 1980 INSURANCE BIDS The total low bid for insurance for the year 1980 was submitted by Transcontinental Brokers in the amount of $91,497. They bid Western Casualty Insurance Company as the primary insurance carrier with selected coverage placed with Internarional Surplus Lines, Ideal Mutual and Interstate Insurance Company. A copy of the bid specifications is pro��ided to you under separate cover. It was the intention of the City to bid the insurance as a package. We did ask for cost breakdown by type of coverage. This breakdown was primarily for the purpose of determining cost allocation, and to give us a ready reference as to the cost of different types of insurance. Rice Creek Agency has raised the question of their bid being lower by $4a0 for the Umbrella coverage, and $52 lower for Governmental Errors and Omissions. Tlie City could probably legally pull these two types of insurance coverages from the package and place them with Rice Creek Agency. However, it was our intent to place all of the business with one agency. There may be some advantage in awarding gart of the business to another Fridley company; however, we feel there would be fewer administrative problems if all the business were awarded to the same company. Therefore, we are recormnending that the bid be awarded to Transcontinental Brokers in the amount of $91,497. The City asked for optional bids for higher Umbrella coverage. This higher coverage w.ould cost an additional $6,240 for $2,000,000 in coverage under the Transcontinental Brokers bid and an additional $5,000 under the Rice Creek Agency bid. It is our feeling that we should stay with the $1,000,000 coverage. The total insurance bid is well within the amount estimated and is actually less than the amount billed to the City for 1979. The billing to the City for the year 1979 was $94,$30. However, it should be remembered that we have increased the deductibles in a number of areas. We have also dropped the comprehensive and collision insurance on all vehicles under $2,000 in value. The amount bi.d for automobile insurance is $4,628 less than the amount billed for 1979. Another area that shows a great decrease is liquor liability coverage. This is $9,772 less than in 1979. One of the reasons for this is that Transcontinental went to Ideal.,Mutual Insurance Company for their Liquor Liability coverage. A group of Minnesota cities has been working eaith Ideal Mutual in the placement of liquor liability insurance as a group. The 1980 bid is higlier in other areas than ir. 1979. � '. I � 9 r H O � P O 0 � A N N 0 b N A V O . O ) � / F� � 'I• l"' �il M O O O ror M Y• N � �• n � N � N O V O W• t0 O --a O \ N m o 0 O o W• N O O � b W f+ o ao �'B 0 0 N H M . i Y ' Oi O fj Y' W fl d W Y f.l n tn M H 4 H Ui G tUti` :' � O' � � . . ; . � iri V � [ v, o rn o cn P� � 's •u yv �i w 7u [�f % t" A .b � W Z) Y O t/� I. -i H W f' Ll �J % % co r � H c" °n � r r �=i d m .. r.� � w y, � `0 N�m .n9 � i fl .l W N y� �+ [) W H O tn W O C: O [�1 lil 'l) Y+ � I � O\ O M� '-1 S A • [t.Y • ��+ Y N� O C�-'] M C+ O '�U O Y O �� A W W\ O K O �. y . . � K w �-• �+ O O 1 O � O� N O p l7 O �O O 'L O O N A W . O O 7 ... ... . � � � °' 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- ��o a R J O R d N O N C '�' :JN N CJ J O. O O OM Vi V O O fi a A r ° w m° n � � C� r1 � ° y m n o' N 7 O M. p y , ILl ` I N e '�B I 'A W .Zi � l(� O !O N V A W r ,Y �.��O D H W W �� e n (] O O Y �-+ (�i O W N p� � H Y n (p O O W N Co A tA W ry Y� V. a p 0 N Y' !] ."� O O pa p� N O U J� , V • O W 0. � n y 'O ti � N W 67 �n �� 7 � on O F ~ W M �y �' �T1 X . � > m c++ � �� 7 � m 9 4 L] � r w a -n � v��x� z� < .y "' m N � C 9 ' b H 0. 2 O O l'] A �i lf D ."y �,. � W N`G F O W . w W N N H K'O M H ' � C . P. �C pyi Y y�A 'y �- S w N 7 m � K a b-- � � C� � Y H K ° `� � �mz �° c � N — O V t0 O ' Y .� N A .-i � S a H �-7 �I � m - rt 7 G" � �NH O.� % _ o. n o �n w � .n � � '- o w vi i � [�J P C .P t+ H W O W P Ut K 3f ^f .� N � y b(� ! Cy" W�[_ r > � � 7 O :iJ O W Co N O Q� N N . Y• N � �� _ �a =' N N �� 9 H O N� W C r� C � Z �+ n �+ H .v K z 0. O lJ W 3 7 � y K� � H � m x+ � ..� r-� w n H� 7 . y � � . • 7 m > K."' ~ c v,n 'ocw c �' �p. H C o �v a �+ �n w mz ww � vv � wt� � n G p m < �G o c ❑ �, W fD H � N n H t�n N 1-� — ~ O� O N N T N N [n �.y �j µl . '+ O� A 1+ W N CO V N � � fJ H�i '3 O� O O� N N V A Q� H O N CJ N- 10 � V J O po O tn ? v p .Y F. �� A �/ O N � O. �t �t Y. y 1-^ a C O N �1 Z W a C N y c" o w K 7 y w • `• •- 3 w � N C N n r 0. C � G W 7 t n r�{ �' !� r O p C M � O C j P y .. .. .H �n O H ❑ N � O � O N O n d r � � � C.; � CO y N N n Q F�• D — — p.{ w �N N � «� y y _� � Q' 00 � N I+ �G{ H �� N O P� `G P� ' ��' p. N rt A O Q� N P� � N C1 < � H w c. n E nO 'x1 `G r� 4 N C+ O n, o' M `� S J N Y � n rt l� lD . � •' � I 'I s� O P �"I 9 - r m � O � , I, a, o C � N H a z � N � y r 1-1 C 7 Fp° � m C orr y U Y � o � O � > O � mr Y I ti .� 0 °o p i O H p 0 F r M � H � I g n P N M Ed A L .s. z m K q y � 5 O d � � M r i � �. �Ny b N M .. Mpy (h tP C a t' O � N � ��y � n t�l y O � M C' � W On K a� � y� 'n N 3 K � K L � � � . H aC '�C~� N N � W "'J � 00 i M i h R 4h m VI N w P� Y• C y � A� 7 a o, yn N G m u w � 9 0. z� � H [rl l� N " za � v�.-z. . � o n .rw�i ^ x � .• G1 '..i (�i N ;� W E 'N (A 7 � n lD N N N Xy � Oao o' v�i 4 L� z p. � �C N Dn O p, � z N c� � p� C 'O [� � H � m n K �V [�n w � � � A � ti W c�+ p � • "� N p. � P W � 7 w ^ . wz �-° � n y `� oo �oo - � O � b Z .'- N Z 9 6 C �� C.i C �? � rt � r ��'� � 9 Y W L] x yn o y�, m �sy �a w� "�c' DH O K ' aH �tWOG'x] m ' tD7 O KK 9 y oo m h �"' � 3 m c� a "' n m F, c � � n e � H m "' wn y p. N y� M a " � 0 � w n .s m " za ��„ ~ O n r+NN � x N O LL W O a E m :" N A � H 4 n °. o � w � c+ m u. o m a �n y u+ H w A• H N♦ Po p' � VI C1 Y' w w � ° N a w m A o n H j' � �° � n a � Q N � H w � c N H HR 7 O a N 7 m c� Y 4 ' W � � �{ H % . a � - a �" � � w a/ m � . . �,, CITY OF FRIDLEY PREMIUM BREAKDOWN �n 1980 PREMIUMS 1979 PRF.MIUMS COVERAGES HON1E INS. - BID #1 WESTEfhV INS. - BID �12 WESTERN INS. GENERAE LIABILII'Y $ 41,585. $ 35,260. $ 22,594. INLAND MARINE 4,356. 2,874. 3,361. PROPERTY 7,030. 6,515. 6,635. CRIME , 2,382. 2,225. 2,182. BUSINHSS INTERRUPTION Incl. in Pack. 167. 199. E30ILER 158. 350. 334. AUTO 26,272. 22,747. 27,375. LIQUOR LIABILITY 5,168. 5,168. 14,940. UtdBRELliA (1M) 10,400. 10,400. 13,945. ERRORS y OMISSIONS $,791. 5,791. 3,265. GRAND TOTAL $103,142. _ $ 9I,497. $ 94,830: Page 2 CITY OF FRIDLEY BID NOTICE for PACKAGE PROPERTY AND CASUALITY INSURANCE EXHIBIT "p„ The City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota will accept sealed bids for Package Property and Casuality Insurance. Such bids will be received by the City blanager's Office no later than November 26, 1979 until 3:00 P•m. on the said date at the Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Avenue Northeast, Fridley, Minnesota; Telephone 571-3450, for the term of January 1, 1980 to .7anuary 1, 1983. The City reserves the right to reject any bids and L'o waive any irregularities or informalities in the bidding. The City reserves the right to accept the bid which is determined to be i.n the best interests of the City. The City reser�es the right to reject any and all bids and tivaive any informalities or technicalities in any bid received cvithout explanation. Copies of the specificatior.s and general conditions may be examined in the office of the Purchasing .4gent, or copies may be obtained from this office. All bids must be submitted in sealed envelopes and plainly marked on the outside with "PACKAGE PROYER'I'Y AND CASUALI'PY INSURANCE" NASIM QURESHI City Manager PUBLISkI: October 31, 1979 November 7, 1979 7E _ Q1�L� F . �i•� ..r. ��ry • :._ _ �«,� o�;�< e=_ POLICE DEPARTM��iIY City of Pradley Ilfl innesota TE NOVEMBER 28, 1979 BJECT ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACT -- 1980 NASIM M TO � � �= i I, CITY MGR : INFO Y.1 Attached you will find the 1980 bids for Animal Control Service, along with an updated brief investigation report on Blaine Midway All Pets regarding past concerns that have been expressed by certain individuals. Based on 1980 projected animal control rea,uirements for the City of Fridley, Blaine Midway All Pets is the low bidder by $532.20 whan all services are totaled. Your attention is directed to item 13 - c, animal destroying. MAPSI is projecting a cost of $828 per year and Blaine Midway All Pets projects no cost. It is my understanding that MAPSI destroys animals by the services of a veterinarian which reflects in the $6 per animal cost. In addition, MAPSI apparently rarely sells animals, except those reauired by Statute and to a few prospective pet owners. Blaine Midway All Pets apparently destroys few animals but rather sells the animals to individuals and educational/commercial institutic•ns. Apparently when animals are destroyed, it is alleged that they are electrocuted by non-veterinarians. It appears that previous concerns over Blaine Midway All Pets still exist to some degree, however, this business apparently has made some significant improvemenis over the past year. It is my opinion that either agency would provide adequate services to the City. The bid award decision appears to rest with Council's concern, if any, over animal destroying methods and if it is Council's feeling that Blaine Midway All Pets have sufficiently corrected the sick animal problems. JPH/sh a ,.�p,osF �J� 6 � �1�i �1� y �� I s� � �a�,��, � JE POLICE IDEPARTti�iENT c�ty �f FP�di�y Minnesota 1979 Blaine Midway All Pets Animal Control Contract ill TO ;�'..� � '�.. . 1' 7, :� Per your request I contacted the following people regarding conditions at this business. • � INFO Ruth DeSchene, Minnesota State Humane Society: She stated that she received about six calls from veterinarians advising that Blaine All Pets was selling sick animals, i.e. kennel cough and distemper. She went on to �ell that there is no proof that tfiey sold the animals knowing they were sick. It is common for this sickness Hihen large quantities of animals li�re together. The United States Department of Agriculture inspected this business and gave it a good report, according to Mrs. DeSctiene. EI Blaine All Pets has requested assistance from Anoka County Humane Society to olace volunteers at the kennel to assist and monitor the control of animals, Generally she thinks things are better this year than in the past. She fias no.knowledge as to how animals are destroyed. Dr. LeBlond, Veterinarian, Centennial Clinic: He is employed by Blaine hlidway All pets. He has received a few calls from other veterinarians regarding dogs that have fiecome ill after they were sold by this kennel. He advised that this is normal where a large amount of animals are housed. Whenever this occurs, the kennel will replace the animal or repay the buyer their cost of the animal. He stated that he advised tfiis ke.nnel on care and prevention of disease to animals and provides disinfectant to control disease. He tFiinks that for i;he number of animals kept at the kennel conditions are satisfactory. He is on call to assist the kennel. Dr. LeBlond advised that the method used to dispose of unwanted animals is electrocution. He thought it was merciful, perhaps not aesthetic hovrever. He doesn't know how the carcasses are disposed of. Dr. Hedges, New Brighton Veterinarian Clinic: He has a long list of past grievances against alaine Midv,ay,however nothing very recent. Ne is concerned about them selling diseased animals and not refunding the buyer's money. He isn't sure ho�r they dispose of their animals, however he has heard it was by electrocution. Ne thinks this 9s a cruel way to dispose uf anirnals. He feels if they woul.d adopt some of his practices in care and disposal of animals they would be much more acceptable. � 1 � � � I i!. L i Il _— I 1 f/D� rn H � E F� Y• • NOO V1 � � 7'i M• N• O O � N � • r w C :G O Vi f� (D : Y•�Oa O ..v n m � Y• 1-� 7 n 7 0 b� O � N 'r K1 O Y �+ p� 9 y� 1 N y� N � � � x v N < V� fJ H N L W �-'yW �+ O t+ ✓ W tD `+ W. Y• r f' .ti 1-� 'O :J � � � � Y y � � (.^. 7• a a: N (l �G > L W Y• fa N {y (> <R L'1 C+ C7 F+ VI V V N F+ O ff O r+ r1 n+ A • A • O A O O �' O O �-' O ooH ooH `C H • N H H N ti � • � (? N fA Vl N V) W � W N „ W A. O� Oo.. �p p� tn A O .°pn�. AAa O�`vG �� a �a 'i f�11 � N � � � y H !n N O� L� N isa i h i N N O O M O W \ y7 N � Go t" m O � � �� ~ .9 H H �.. ry y N 4v tD in V+ t� t.v V u �-+ J N Y p� N N O t1 f' q . . p • o O O P O O O� O O A \ \ A n � n H N �w-' H N�w-' f+ !� Y h y, m v+ +n m �n V 1/� F� V N �" p� rf N O f1 F' A • � p� <) O O � \ O A \ H r r H Y�' . � r .- �' y • F+ \ N � � .i H O�. H �-7 � H H y ., , r r i.� r = rn r �� S`- � i^ p 1 ra H f� � N V o CJ p O 7 O H C� a a � m �o m m r• �a 0 0 7 a m H m � a 3Ti 'b r- m H W H w 1 n y� �+ m �. �b � :� n '� 8 B 1 � 1 ' i . � • . � { 1 _ . I � / b�x � :" n � C � v H 0 � . V f� 17. Y'W H G] P� � ja�'�o � m cn v !'J � �, .�., `+ ..� ty+ H j W H n y � N CJ 'C1 �+ � '� D •• � � 7 H tu o o � Y. O YN "hy r" Y u`�G 7y O H �r' .. M��n rn+ a' A 3 w e t�' , E�._ . v w < � m K . : r.:, .. � � [n11 O N Z . C W � N• N zYY'd � H W 7 H I Y• Y Cy. �. A� lli � _ � F+• r� � � b � � y N K �� ry N 3 o n D' y;�'� ..Ki � ? � k.7 `. .� n �o w w H � H Y• a ~ N 7 "3 0 '� M .-.'J '[1 f- N H 4d y Y• � n N � (J M O"'J � � n 'd 7 7 � n o f> t� C V1 H n 0 � � N ( � H a y O ro N R. . � o �' w o. ; � y i� c, �. 0 X' '� � V� . c> . A. N w �� 1 f � �f � � � _�; � , Y 8431 UttIVERSlTY A`lENUE N.B., FRIDLEY, tdINNESOTA b6432 TELEPHONE (Bi2)571-3450 Novcmbex 1, 1979 M0.PSI SOG - llth Ave. No. Mpls., MN 55411 9ear Sir: Thc Ci�; of rridle}� is rcn,uestinfi bids fbr Animal Patrol Service ior the yc-ar c: 1930 ,tarting JSnu�.z^y 1, 1950 through Decer.�her 31, 19�0. The Uelc�a �`if;ures reflect an estiuiar.:;d annual re�uirement for Animal Control Services in Lhe City of Fridley. Eval.uation will Ue based on tliese fi.�ares in audi.tio. to otlzex• factoz•s, sucii as facili.ties o: the cantractor, iii.story of Yw;aan� cam of a.nimals and complaints. ':7ie estima.ted ii�ures do not bind t}.e Ci.ty of Prid2ey to maintain that level of service. See attached specifications. Patrol Boarding A��ir:zl Destroyiny Ir.jured Animal/ Bite Case Special Service 1040 Iiours e/t?. �G7 hr. _$ lo, �j�QD • DO 948 days @,>, (�� day =$� p, 20 138 ani�als � �y��0 animal $ �?-�,O(i 64 calls C� /2, OQ call =$ �j �O 64 calls @_i�� r30 call = $_,%�p�,dp �•o•rr�t. � /�,12�.� 2b Sids uill Ue acc�ptcd w:til 11:00 on itot'r;�ber 2c1, 1979 a;; the Fri.dley Cit)� 13a17.. . n�i t��.as nt�st l�e subr.:ifted in scaled envclopes and 'pla.inly na.r::e!! en £l:e outs.i.de trite� °1An;m�il Control'�, . l.f fnrther i.nfori�ation is nc:eded, extc» _;i.cn 13�. SiPCerely. • �l�//� ;, r�;; , ��•'r t �i'�f•' '. ;l'.�',/r < <i �': � ; <' .c iT / . GorJun J. ?,iid�;•tr 1'urch;�s.i�i,; ��.ont G.I ��;l�nC. plcnsc contacY n;c at 5;2-�q�0 � ' . It �/.,1•. ��<_'-�:�--%�c. . _�t'..� . �--- � p p �1 Cou;;�c�,i� l(r✓_It�rL�G ,er.f _�°i�!� J_�l,l�l�j Acictrc:,�J'"�O{�%(��j1/z°-, —�j'-- �r,:��,�i:�;�� 33`�- ��, ; j' !)f�t �`.. _._ �//� `7��L__.------- —^- , ��._ 8C ,,7.^Ne, � c�-��i �� 8431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E., � fRID�L�EY, MINNESOTA � 55432 � TELEPHONE ( 612)571-3450 1{ove�hb�.r '_, i�79 a Greg Wax 'Blaine hlidway All Vets 1D911 N.E. Radisson Road Blaine, hiN 55434 Dear Sir: i�;l: r.1.'t� Or ��T]i�iC� 1: �CQ1CS::lIIy� }i.l��.t5 i:?'!' �r�iR1ID2.'. P84T01 JC"V7.C2. ior.the )'ear of I°SQ st�r�i.ng 3aaua.y 1, :9°,0 throu�ii llecembc-r 31., 19"a0. �� 711C �)2iOV1 Z1�U�f.S 7''�:IEC� .'..!i c'�Si:.tGk'L°G� IlI7"�1L`Fl� 1'CCtI11TC�:::R� rOY' i�?ll`.t18�. � C.^.iEl'.7'J� .ciEE21'7.::C5 1.?I i.i1C �.1tY" of "rri.:,'iey. E'i<1ili8i.lMl H'i�.l t!C �J.'�..5�=u QR YnL•SC f1hLP_"ES l.Il A�1:11C.7.OG 10 ^Lf8'.^ r:::Z:OTS� 5:2�!1 .25 °:1C:.?.!i.12.5 Of � 't}1C CU71L:8L:G:� !!75Y.C7]" 0= }:L��G2��6 Cai'd O�: u;II..T.1i5 2.^.C� CC�}��7.:ri�°., . �� Z.h° P.SL1L:1teC1 ilj;::i?5 i1� TtOL CIP.L Y'P.0 l.I.I\" O� .�_iC�:.UY 't0 lu:iHL:l?I ' � � Y}l3'C lE::'�i Ci S2Z\'1.C2. $EC :1:.i.�.C:O:,� Si=CC��1L'� �SO??5. _ Patr:�l P,aar�!? u�, r:511.l.^.el L�S�`,TDY1.Tt�: Illjt.Trri ,'�U':i'•:.:ii�� Ji:.+.0 C�dSE Svecial Se,r�zce :OrtO hr..,-rs ti C1l.r.�o hr. _�,1 I�--•- 6^-nn 948 da: s�Q__ S..3.._�� dLy =�� R�!,.nn 7.3J (IIISILSAS : _p_ ar.ir::al °_�-- Jt 'LCS� � S '.�. � 1 � Q7 C411 =. � %ll�l. �n (,d c3:'s 2_�11_00 Call = �,�04.00 TuTni ;. 1 5 , 6L2^00._ C�3s. �c.iil be :iccep�ed t�n�il _1:0� cn Vor�:abe-r 2�J, aS7`! aL 41.e I'z.i�l�.. �.5:i). �i?.i�. . . . . . :�1! �;L�f: 1.".115t. hP 5!i�iI11L�;.iC(� -71 g,1'1Ct� f:Rlrf•j.?_�F,S 3PC� }�la=]`1;� I431�:C;� O.1 • '�}1C Ui:t.�i4C lll.'ih ��:�.li7.1!?3? CJI?i.l'[l.l��. TT CU`17i!1:'.T. :.iiL"f�l'11i:aL1i�R 1`: 11CCGi`t�� `y1;.CF:SU C:?:l`:ilC:'t 19C �i. S71"3=4.�iQ� $XI:?1:51^vi: i.:j'. � . 5 i.1*: �'re 7 y, :. . �• f�j'�l.-r• , /•'r, r i �, �!,.;�:.f; �> . '�`'� %* (:�:ri:,� .1'. .`d:.;.l:�r. f',:r�•l�.ii :;�iy. :1;;i•�i,: ' l:1tt!�i: Jty CounanY__ Blain,^ Plidwa�,,,�l.j_.°n.1:.L- Inc. ��•:,:,;:----10911 Radi sson RdlN. Ey �; �,7 ca.;:��nc 7`?�F-3 G69 ....____.__. . ll:; i c....:. _......1_.i..._� 0.., � c i_ ..._._ __ __._....._---•. ', , . • P.ESOLUTI ON BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Fridley enter into an agreement with the State of P".innesota, Department of, Transportation,for the following purposes, to k�it: T.o provide a traffic control signal on Trunk Highway No. 47 (University Avenue Northeast) at 69th Avenue Northeast in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 59571N. a copy of F�hich was before the Council. BE IT FURTHEB RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFiCATION State of tiinnesota � " �County of Anoka City of Fridley I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of , 1979, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. (Seal) � City Clerk-Treasurer 0 0 A2INNESOTA TPIat]SPORTATIOPI DEPARTM�NT TRAFFIC COidTROL SIGNF,L AGP.EEN.ENT NO. 59571b" BETWEEN THE STATE OF TiI:INESOTP_, DEPP_RTi!ENT OF TRANSPORTATION AI1 D THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, r'INNESOTA FOR Installation of a Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 47 (University Avenue Northeast) at 69th Avenue Northeast in Fridley, D_innesota.. S.P. 0205-50 Prepared by Traffic Engineering EuTIr471TED AI+?OUNT RECEIVAIILE None AD:Ot7i�iT EI3CUbIBERED None a /I 0 THIS AGREEf•lENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State", and the City of Fridley, hereinafter referred to as the "City", WITNESSETH: WxEREAS, the City desires that a traffic control signal be installed at the Intersection of Trunk Highway No. 47 (University Avenue Northeast) and 69th Avenue Northeast in the City; and NIHgREAS, present policy anc priority regulations governing the use of state trunk highway fer.ds to provide a traf£ic control signal at said Zocation indicate that such funds will not be available in the near future; and WHEREAS, City resolution No.•38-1979 adopted March 5, 1979, provides, among other things, that the City is willing to pay the State's share of fifty percent of the cost of said traffic control signal installation; and F'HEREAS, the City and the State.wilL participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of said traffic control signal as hereinaf.ter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The State shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications and proposal and shall assist in the performance of the construction, engineering and inspection work all at the cost and expense of the State� using funds otl.erwise encwnbered by the district. 59571M -1- Ga�k 0 2. The City shall advertize for bids and duly award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, � subject to concurrance by the State, for installation of a traffic control signal with street light's and signing at the intersection of Trunk Highway No. 47 (University P_venue Northeast) and 69th Avenue Northeast in accordance with the plan and specifications for State Project No. 0205-50, all at the cost and expense of the City. (Estimated Construction Cost $100,000.00). � ' 3. The City shall submit to the State's Director - Traffic • Engineering Section a certified copy of the low bid received and an abstract of all bids received by the City, toqether with the City's request for concurrence by the State in the award of a construction contract. Award of the contract shall not be made until the State advises the City in �ariting of its concurrence. 4. The City shall install or cause the instaliation of an adequate electrical power supply to the sezvice pad including any necessary extensions of power lines, and upon completion of said traffic control signal with street lights installation shall provide necessary electrical power for its operation at the cost and expense of the City. 59571D1 -2- m 5. Upon completion of the,work contemplated herein, the State shall maintain the signing and shall maintain and keep , in repair the traffic control signal, except for relamping, cleaning and painting at its cost and expense; and the City shall relamp, clean and paint the signal and shall maintain street lights at the cost and expense of the City. 6. The City indemnifies, saves, and holds harmless the State and all of its agents and employees of and from any and all claims, denands, actions or causes of action of r=hatsoever .� nature or character arising out of, or by reason of, the performance of any work by the City provided for hereby, and further agrees to defend, without cost or expense to the State, its agents or employees, any action or proceeding commenced far the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of the work to be performed �y the City. 7. All timing of a11 traffic control signals provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State. 59571P4 -3- 0 APPROVED AS TO FORI•1: � City Attorney , CITY OF FP.IDLEY By , ayor (City Seal) By . City P:anager � ' STATE OF MINNESCTA DEPART;iENT OF TRP�ISPORTATION DEPARTA�NT OF TRANSPORTA^tION RECOI�It'�NDED FOR APPP.OVP_L: . District Engineer Field Operations Division By Assistant Commissioner Dated APPROVED AS TO FORh; AND EXECUTICN: DEPARTN�NT OF ADMINISTRAiION: Assistant Attorney General State of ::innesota 59571r! -4- By— Dated: AGREEMENT COUNTY OF ANOICA/CITY OF FRIDLEY STATE PROJECT NO. 0205-50 � THIS JOINT POSaERS AGREEMENT made and entered into by �, and between the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota {hereinafter '� referred to as CoUNTY), and the City of F'ridley, State of . Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as CITY), pursuant to ' 8innesota Statutes Section 471.59, as amended, providing for ' , the joint exercise of powers. .• � WITNESSETH: ' � ' • � WHE?tEAS, the City did enter into an agreement (No. .�� ' S9571M) with the t4innesota Department of Transportation (MN � . i DOT) concerning the installation of a traffic control signal with street liqhts and signing on T.H. S97 at 69th Avenue N.E. (hereinafter referred to as State Project No. 0205-50); and WHEREAS, among other things, said Agreement calls for the City to advertise for bids and to bear the entire cost ___ ! of construction estimated at $100,00.0.00; and WHEREAS, the County has by Resolution 79-112 agreed to advertise for bids and to pay 258 of the costs of construction ! and engineering for said traffic signalization; � NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the m�."��.._"��cnants:� �-' � contained herein, the parties agree as follows: . . - • .. 1. PURPOSE .- -.. . ... - . �. . . . ' The purpose of this Joint-Powers Agreement is to provide , • for the installation of a traffic control signal with street lights and signing at the intersection of T.H. :47 and 69th ' Avenue N. E. pursuant to the plans and specifications for State Project No. 0205-50, as hereinafter set forth.- , 0 } ' 2. DEFINITION i � As used in this Agreement, the term "construction and engineering costs" refers to those construction and engineering costs necessary to the completion of, and in accordance with the plans and specifications for, State Project 0205-50. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE . This Joint Powers Agreement shall become effective when signed by the duly authorized representatives of the parties. The evidence of the actions of the parties approving this Agreement has been filed in the Anoka County Office of Administration and such evidence of approval is hereby incorporated by r�ference and made a part of this Agreement. 4, BIDS AND AWARDS � It is understood and agreed that the County shall be the purchasing agent for State Project No. 0205-50. The County,�-pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, and in accordance with its established practices and the laws governing purchases by the County. shall solicit bids, and � shall tabulate, evalvate, and discuss with the City and MN - DpT, all bids received pursuant to s8id solicitation. Upon . written concurrence by the City and .SN DOT the County shall make an award on behalf of the parties to the lowest responsive ._ responsible bidder. The award skiall establish thr. total ... • cost of the project. � - . �. 5. CONTRACT AND PERFORPfANCE BOND -� � �• �-- It is further agreed by the parties that the County . shall execute a contract with, and require a performance bond from, the successful bidder in the full amount of the award. Said contract shall conform to the requirements applicable to contracts ordinarily made by the County. The 0 _2_ I award and contract shall include this Joint Powers Agreement in its .tetms by reference. Any recovery for failure of the successful bidder to perform according to the terms of the contract, or from the persnn or corporation supplying the performance bond, shall be prorated between the parties as their interests may appear. 6, • PROJECT�ENGINEERING . . � It is understood and agreed that the County shall provide all administration and necessary engineering for State Project No. 0205-50. All such costs shall be shared by the'parties in such proportion, and in accordance with the terms, hereinafter set forth. The County shall notify the City and MN DOT at such time as inspection and approval of the project for payment have been made. I£ no objection to the County determination is made by the City within seven (7) days of said notice, the City agrees that said omission of action shall be deemed approved. . 7, CHANGES IN PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS � 7 _.—�_.._ The parties further agree that, in the event the changes in the plans or specifications are necessitated by changee in the material circumstances of the project, or by requests for changes by MN DOT, or by changes necessitated - • by the construction contract, the City shall re^'^"' °'-,rh - proposed changes within five (Sl days of submission end _ shall not unreasonably withhold its_consent to such proposed changes. If no objection to said proposed changes is received. _- by the County within seven (7? days of submission, the City agrees that said omission of action shall be deemed consent. Changes that affect the terms of the contract shall be amended to the contract in accordance with its terms governing modifications and amendments. =3- . ' 9I . B. FUNDING , ' It is agreed that the total funding for State Project No. 0205-SO shall be provided by the County and the City, � with the County's share being 258 and the City's share being . 758. At such time as the construction award is let, the . County will prepare an estimate of the City's share of said . project, estimates based on the price bid by the successful , contractor, and shall furnish the City with said cost estimate. The City shall pay to the County Treasurer of Anoka County, Minnesota, the City's proportionate share of the contract entered into with the successful bidder, or any amendments �hereto, within"thirty (30) days of invoicing by the County. ' All funds shall be strictly accounted for according to . • generally accepted accounting principles and disbursed in • accordance with the method provided by law for the disbursement of funds by counties. The County shall provide a report of all disbursements made to carry out the purposes of this Agreement to ihe City. 9. LIMITATZON OF LIABILITY f It is agreed that, except as set forth in this Agreement, all duties, tasks and expenses defined in the City's Agreement with Mt3 DOT (NO. 59571f1) shall be bcrne by the City. � .- , _ � 10. INDEMNIFICATION � � �_-� - � . . : .' �' It is agreed that the City shall in3emnify, save.and - _ hold harmless the County and a1L of its agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, aations or causes of �. , � action of whatever nature arising out of, or by reason of, --� the performance of any work of the County provided for hereby, and further agrees to defend, without cost or expense� to the County, its agents or employees, any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatever . character arising in connection with or by virtue of the . work to be performed by the County. 11. DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY It_is agreed that any surplus moaies dedicated to this project.shall be returned to the parties in proportion to the contribution o£ the parties. All property acquired as the result of this Agreement shall be the sole property of the City. . '� 12. TERMINATION Thi� Aqreement may be terminated by giving thirty (30) days notice of such intention to terminate, in writing, to the other party. Such termination shall not be effective with respect to any solicitation'for bids or obligations accrued by the County. � •� SN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Joint Power� Agreement to be signed and approved by the proper o£ficers of each of the parties, and attested by the proper officer, on the dates written below. ��COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA By: Albert A. Rordiak, Chairman Anoka County Board of Commissioners ATTEST: • By: Ralph L. McGinley Executive Secretary to�County Board of Commissioners Dated: CITY OF FRIDLEY, STATE OF MINNESOTA By'------- i4illiam Nee, Mayor �. .� -. �ATTEST: , .. - Sy:^ - - Nasim Qures i, City Manager Dated: N 9J .-�O,f• Cp�M y�. f ♦ ::.* Mwn�'� COU NTY OF ANOKA Ojfice of rhe County Board of Commissioners COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 November 20, 1979 Mr. Nasim Qureshi, Manager City of Fridley Fridley City Hall 6431 University Avenue Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Nasim: I would like to take this opportunity to apcalogize for not responding to you sooner on the matter of the joint powers agreement for the installation of a traffic signal at 69th Avenue and Trunk Highway 47. You will recall from our previous telephone discussion that the joint powers agreement which authorized County participation in this signal provided for only 25� of County cost contribution. The intent of the County Board, as previously declared by County Board action, was to participate at a 50� cost level for this intersection signalization. The 25� not covered in the joint powers agreement will be provided tn the project from Regional Parks and Open Space - Regional Trails funding. I am advised that the Parks Department has made application on behalf of this project and should be receiving the funding in the near future. Once the funding from the Regional Trails Proqram is received, a separate agreement will be struck for the remaining 25$ participat�.on. Thank you for your attention to this matter; and if you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. With personal regards, I am, Sin 1/l�fi . Ralph L. McGinley Executive Secretary RLM:sm cc: Dave Torkildson �9K 10 T0: CITY HANAGER AND CITY COUPlCIL • FROM: MARVIN C. BRUP�SELL DATE: NOVEMBER 29, 1979 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO SIMER Pf1MP COMPANV PROJECT INDUSTRIAL UEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND The attached resolution indicates that the City Council has given preliminary approval to the issuance of $700,000 IDR bond to Simer Pump Company. After application has been made to the State and all the other legai documents have been filed with the State of Minnesota, Simer Pump Company's attorney will act on the application and return the documents to the City at which time the City will be given an opportunity to give final approval to the 6ond issue. • Also attached is a copy of a statement to the Minnesota Commissioner of Securities which Simer Pump's attorney has requested be signed by Mayor Nee to submit along with the State application. r RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT POJECT BY SIMER FUMP COMPANY UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL THEREOF Be It Resolved by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. There has been presented to this Council a pro- posal by Simer Pump Company, a Minnesota Corporation, (the "Company"), that the City undertake a project pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act (Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474) for the renovation of the Company's existing manufacturing facility and the acqusition, construction and equipping of an addition to the existing facility (the "Project"). Under the proposal, the Project will be owned by the Company, and the Company will enter into a Loan Agreement with the City upon such terms and conditions as are necessary to produce income and revenues sufficient to pay when due the principal of and interest on up to approximately $700,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds of the City to be issued pursuant to said Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, to provide monies for the renovation, acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project and the City will pledge its interest in the Loan Agreement to the bondholder, and the Company will mortgage the Project to secure the bonds. 2. As required by said Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, this Council conducted a public hearing on November 26, 1979 on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project, after publication in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation in the City of a notice of the time and place of hearing, stating the general nature of the Project and an estimate of the principal amount of the bonds or other obligations to be issued to finance the Project and stating that a draft copy of the proposed Application to the Commissioner of Securities, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, shall be available for public inspection at the office of the City Clerk, in the City Hall, Fridley, Minnesota, at all times between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:OOp.m. each day except Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays to and including the day of hearing; and all parties who appeared at the public hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal. 3. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the purpose of the Project is and the effect thereof will be to promote the public welfare by the attraction, ; l0A .� ' ; 10� encouragement and development of economically sound industry, agriculture and commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment; the retention and development of industry to use the available resources of the community, in order to retain the benefit of its existing investment in educational and public service facilities, by halting the movement of talented, educated personnel of mature age to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental services and facilities; the more intensive development of land available in the area; and the more intensive development of land available in the area to provide a more adequate tax base to finance the cost of governmental services in the City, County and School District where the Project is located. 4. The Company has entered into preliminary dis- cussions with Piper Jaffray & Hopwood, Incorporated, as Underwriters, and Piper Jaffray & Hopwood, Incorporated reported that the Project and the sale of bonds therefor are feasible. 5. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by the City subject to approval of the Project by the Commissioner of Securities and subject to final approval by this Council and by the purch3sers of any bonds to be issued and as to the ulitmate details of the Project. 6. In accordance with Section 474.U1, Subd. 7, Minnesota Statutes, the Mayor, City Manager, the City Clerk, and such other officers and representatives of the City as may from time to time be designated are hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the Project to the Commissioner of Securities and request her aFproval thereof, and the Mayor, City Manager, the City Clerk, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminary information as she may require. The Company, Messrs. Faegre & Benson as bond counsel, the Underwriters, the City Attorney, and other City officials are also authorized to initiate the preparation of a proposed loan agreement, mortgage, and such other documents as may be necessary or appropriate to the Project so that, when and if the proposed Project is approved by the Commissioner and this Council gives its final approval thereto, the Project may be carried forward expeditiously. 7. .The Company has agreed to pay any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or not the Project is approved by the Commissioner and whether or not the Project is carried to completion. 0 STATE OF MINNESOTA ). j SS. COUNTY OF ANOKA ) •' ' 10 D I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk of ihe City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached extract of minutes of a regular meeting • of the'City Council of said City held November 26, 1979, is a fn11, true and correct transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to an industrial development project to be undertaken pursuant to Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, by the City and Simer Pump Company. WITNESS My hand and seal officially as said City Clerk this _ day of , 1979. City Clerk (Seal) November , 1979 Minnesota Commissioner of Securities Minnesota Department of Commerce t Securities Division 500 Metro Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 ATTENTION: Mr. Tom Collins Re: $700,000 City of Fridley Industrial Development ReVenue Bond (Simer Pump Company Project) Dear Sir: � Simer Pump Company, a Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), advises us that it intends to use the proceeds of the above-referenced issue to assist in the financing in the City of Fridley, Minnesota (the "City"), of the renovation of its existing manufacturing facility and the constructi�n and equipping of an addition thereto, to be used by the Company in its business (the "Project"). The Project will be owned by the Company. 1. Based on the certification of the Company, I believe that the Project will serve a valid public purpose under the laws of the State of Minnesota, including the Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 (the "Act"), for the followinq reasons: a. It is anticipated that the Project, upon comple- tion, will create approximately 12 new jobs at an annual payroll of "approximately $144,000 based upon currently �Minnesota Page Two November Commissioner of Securities _, 1979 prevailing wages. The Project will thereby assist in halting the migration of persons out of the City and stabilizing the commercial character of the communit�. b. It is therefore anticipated that the Project will assist in preventing economic deterioration; providing for development of sound industry and commerce to use the available resources of the community in order to retain the benefit of the community's existing investment in education and public service facilities; halting the movement of talented, educated personnel to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human resources needed as a base for providing governmental � services and facilities; and providing a more adequate tax base to finance the costs of governmental services. 2. I further certify, in order to provide the information required to be supplied to the Commissioner of Securities as Exhibits 5, 6 and 7 to the Application to the Commissioner for approval of the Project, as follows: a. Upon entering into the revenue agreement for the Project between the City and the Company, the information required by Section 474.01, subd. 8, Minnesota Statutes, will be submitted to the Department of Economic Development. b. The Project does not include any property to be sold or affixed to or consumed in the production of property for sale, and does not include any housing facility to be rented or used as a permanent residence. c. In connection with the Project, a public hearing was conducted pursuant to Section 474.01, subd. 7(b), Minnesota Statutes, at the Citv Hall of the City at o'cicok P.M. on November 26, 1979, and at said hearing all interest parties were afforded an opportunity to express their views. -2- THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA By Mayor H 10 F RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREO�: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ST. 1980-1 {SIVERTS LANE) WHEREAS, Resolution No. 126-1979 adopted on the 5th day of November 1979 by the City Council, set the date for hearing on the proposed improve- ments, as specifically noted in the Notice of Hearing attached hereto for reference as Exhibit "A", and WHEREAS, all of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of these improvements (as noted in said notice) were given ten (10) days notice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property owners heard thereon at the hearing as noted in said notice, NOW THEREfORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the following improvements proposed by Councii Resolution No. 126-1979 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible, to wit: Street improvements, including grading, stabilized bas, hot-mix bituminous mat, sewer, water, storm sewer and other facilities, located as follows: Siverts Lane 69th Avenue N.E. to 600' south 2. That work to be performed under this project may be performed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt af bids. 3. That the Acting Public Works Director, Nasim M, Qureshi, is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1979. - ILLI J. NEE ATTEST: CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL ii OFFICIAL PUBLICATION CITY OF FRIDLEY (EXHIBIT A) NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS STREET, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENC PROJECT ST. 1980-1 W3iEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, has deemed it expedient to receive evidence pertaining to the improvements hereinafter described. NOW, THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TEIAT on the 19th day of November, 1979 at 7:30 o'clock P.M. the City Council will meet at the City Hall in said City and will at said time and place hear ali parties interested in said improvements in whole or in part. The general nature of the improvements is the construction (in the lands and streets noted below) of the following improvements, to-wit: CONSTRUCTION ITEM Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, sewer, water, storm sewer and other facilities, located as.follows: 1. Siverts Lane: 69th Auenue N.E. to 650 feet South. FSTIMATED COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � 38,500.00 THAT THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ASSESSED FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS IS AS FOLLOWS: For Construction Item above -------------------------------""-""-"' All of the land abutting upon said streets named above and all lands within, adjacent and abutting thereto. All of said land to be assessed proportionately according to the benefits received by such improvement. That should the Council proceed with said improvements they will consider each separate improvements, except as hereafter otherwise provided by the Coimcil all under the following authority, to-wit: Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chapter 429 and laws amendatory thereof, and in conformity with the City Charter. DATED THIS Sth DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1979, BY ORDER OF TNE CITY COUNCIL. MAYOR - WILLIAh1 J. NEE Publish: November 7, 1979 November 14, 19?9 } , •.. :,-_ _... _ . i. I✓ � � . . .. sR< Jl) M➢i� � /OJa+- � ^ � 11 U .. • 50 '/[o� iTnr'-*'�% � o � /oo ;�_'°--Y . i'�{j � 2J�•�--- —'g—'--�idvlt �i". .) 7! O � i :1 n 1310 ►3zo. 1330 {340 � �350 4'1360 �370 �380 01�� 400 s J r�,:= .., � � . ! '✓ %. � : . ',.;* , �y E ..; �� :c � - � � 1 � � . _'.. yg .� I 'y , t . ^ (.z N� (1z9-oy7o (vza), (sa6a) o(zoao) i a `` �i'� < : L� d �� '! (8 '9 2�^n�.. y��. `�S (�a) j 3y', ' `e �� .; � _ � � \ lw 1L� � 9 � �p .. - � ._,0 e � �� \ �� `�': K.e,Y � : " .. \ ♦ e��.. �.�a �, �+ \ti� IO �� IS ��- \ Q � . ,. . . . ..' ` ,. ' - , �:= ' "my l� . .. � � � V /I I7 4, . 3uie I• ioe o� r 1: .� .... ,,6 � � ^� EI � � ° � � T•: � '�`•'. ;�i lt3. .' Q . �_:;.: �• 685I ; _ E : �, ��O � . . �� ; , n 6864a� me.r ` \.�'�O _' � Y � , �.�sJ � ( � . - �p'� I '� 6850 � 66a o \ � �1'F/i /i %� �a i Fi.//ij� �S . %i..P /.��i.iy� 4-i(t',p� _ �-- {//1/ �� :6zo7 Gify of Frid/ey .. ( /i.Mf OePi. f _ Street,;:SeW r & Water'Imprc�veme�t ;� �:° Pra,7ect" �48 =1 r • ' . .�'.:..f. �'��'•' y\ _, _ - _ � �� _ t � :._ � - - 'h - �: �� ~ 5 3� � 0 00� ' (/3D0% (5 9� i" �� . F/oyd F. � . . ... \ .' Sla�r efd✓'.,..,.i1.r.J � for/�en � t , _ 2 ` \Q 3 __ � � � � .�� .�� . �� .. . — — — — 7 �1�'� `k � .c � ��. I n �a�s��'. I `"�'' s ,H!/ �II ic� /c.�fr .f ��-.--�..�� =a,a.._ f:sr<rJ vo Bil3B K�7 N.) "iJ�: H74 B� � •n e �1 9 ^ _ � �- �-�-6'_ _ �- --¢ s „ �= ss 65E34: "' f �L:.(/sanN .. I3�5 I13ZT 1339 • e� TH AV E. _ �351 ��6g . Gj f3Se OQ'��> i :�. sii�±�� ~P��e 'C k i" � . � � ::■ �� ,.� OV//LOt A N. /11f:yF ' OvrcoT % . : -. � t � ' o u, a�* ��:.. � `k j 6�5 .. . � '� _ -�6. .. I ` � _ ''.. (/o�oJ l cs5 f� _ - , _ _ -- :, + \�� U3¢o) � G 9 � 2 "' / � \ 4 .. ,ti, Z 3 �r+ ° ..:,i nff+..i, o�• f�X,9� 2z =;` : � xt�PO��se = / � ;rv . r:.�4� 5� _.� 21}r," � � i r ry . . _�Z i : t ...zp . f 3T5 138T 1399 : I �a�. � :�' �r t � �- . . �eJ.:. 8 �. z � . � K� 6ciya � � �. �. �� - � EE , .. ,"�, B;" 13�$ 8,.. :.. R `F" $ . ;Ri�� G �PR � � � . /� I t�o0 I �'T\ (71 2 �.. . e . ' . . �376�.Id� .. �� -,A� ' /� y � i_J�o-i �pt4l�\�" 4t+y- /( �� p ��/, {1� A �`lti�� y°,��: 4:.�"� 54�...�� Yr:\.r._r ..� e[. � �� 1' G .� 5 t� n 6 t.' x�sor,crrior� No. - 19�9 A RESOLUTION FOR INITIAL APPRWAL OF TflE OFFICIAL DRAFT OF THE CO[�RIIIINSIVE DEVEI�OPMENP PLAN FOR THF. CITY OF FRIDLEY F0R SUBMiSSION TO AA7AC.'ENT COM�IIJNITIES FOR REVIEW AND CONP'�I�PI' idiEREAS The City of Fridley has been developinq its comprehensive development plan as required under Minnesota Statutes of 1976 Chapter 127 (Metropolitan Land Planning Act)- and • 4d�REAS, 'Ifie City of Fridley has provided fo: public input through its commission process and pui�lic hearings; and id�REAS, 'It�e Planning Con¢nission of the City of Fridley has reconmiend approval of tne Official Draft of the Comprehensive Develo�nent Plan of the City of Fridley NOW T[�REE'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED 'oy the City Council of the City of Fridley that the Official Draft Comprehensive Plan for the City of F'ridley be given initial approval and submitted to adjacent co�rmunities for Review and Comnent. pp3SED pDID ADOPTED BY THE CITY �IL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS IY�Y OF , 1979. WILLIAM J. NEE - NP�,YOR ATPEST: CITY CLERK - D9AKVIN C. BRUN�r•r• RESOLUTION N0. - 1979 A RESOLU7ION APPROVING THE OFFICIAL DRAFT OF THE CRITICAL AREA PLAN FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BOARO FOR REVIEW AND APPROUAL WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has completed its Official Draft of the Critical Area'Plan as required under the Critical Areas Act passed by the Minnesota State Legislature in 1973 and issue by Executive Order No 130 in 1976 by the Governor of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS the City of Fridley has fullfilled its requirements for public hearings as layed out in said Act; and WHEREAS, the Plannir�g Correnission of the City of Fridley has recommended approval of the Official �raft of the Critical Area Plan for the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley, in approving this draft understands that final approval will take place by action of the City Council after review and approval by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley that the Official Draft of the Critical Area Plan be approved and submitted to the Minnesota Environmentai Quality Board for review and approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1979. WILIIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: ITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL RESOLUTION NO. -1979 A RESOLiTPION AUTHORIZING THE AIh�IINISTRATION TO APPLY FOR FUNDS FOR THE DEVEUJPMENP OF T[-IE FRIDLEY C06'A7UNITY PP.RK PRLlTDCT PROPERTY UNDER 'Ii� PR(7JISION OF 7.IiE FEDERAL IAND AND 4�,TER CONSERVATION FUND ACT AND THE STATE NAT[JRAL RESO[JE�ES E'[J�ID 4diEREAS, the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act'and the State Natural Resources ELmd provides for the making of grants to assist local public bodies in the development of outdoor recreation projects. f�EiEREAS, the City of Fridley desires to develop certain land known as Fridley Comnunity Park, which_land is to be held and used for permanent open space. 4�REAS, in order for the proposed project to be eligible for approval, there must be proof that it is part of a comprehensive outdoor recreation plan and 5-year action program tcaPital improvement); and . Fa]EREAS, TIIE CITY OF FRIDLEY included in the application a copy of the approved 5-year action program which includes Fridley Co�nunity Park. YdiERFAS, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 P.L. 88-354 (1964) and of the regulations promulgated pursuant to such Act by the Secretary of the Interior and contained in 43 C.F.R. 17, effectuating that title, ptovides that no person shall be discriminated against because of race, color or national origin in the use of the land ao�uired and/or developed. Vd�REAS, it is estimated that the cost of developing phase I as laid out in this application shall be $309,282.00 with an estimated total developnent cost of 855,944.00. NOW, TIiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COU[QCIL OF Tf� CITY OF FRIDLEY 1. �at an application be made to the Office of Local and Urban Affairs of the State Planning Agency for a qrant from the Land and Water Qonservation Fund as amended in 1965 for an amount presently estimated to be $133,333.00 and the applicant will pay the balance of the cost from other funds available to it. 2. That an application be made to the Office of Local and Urban Affairs of the State Planning Agency for a grant from the Natural Resources FUnd {Minnesota Laws, 1979, Chapter 333, Section 31, Suudivision 3, par. (j) or (k) for an amount presently estimated to be $66,667.00 and the applicant will pay ttie balance of the cost from other funds available to it. 3. That Jerrold Boardman, City Planner, is hereby authorized and directed to execute and file such application with the State of Minnesota Office of Local and Urban Affairs of the State Planning Agency and to provide additional information and to furnish such documents as may be required by said Agency, to execute such contracts as are required by said Agency and to act as the authorized oorrespondent of the Applicant. � Page 2---RESOLUTION NO. - 1979 4. That the proposed develcpment is in accrordance with plans for the allocation of land for open space uses, and that should said grant be made, the applicant will develop and retain said land for use(s) designated in said a�lication and approved by the Office of Local and Urban Affairs and the H.C.R.S. 5. That the United States of America and the 5tate of Minnesota be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the applicant with the regulations of the Department of the Interior, effectuating Title VI of ttie Civil Rights Act of 1964. pASiED AND 11WPTED BY THE CI'PY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TfiIS DAY OF , 1979. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATPEST: CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUN�r•r• RESOLUTION No. - 1979 A RESOLUTION TO A�VERTISE FOR BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NATURE CENTER UISITOR BUILOING BE IT RESOLUED BY the Council oT the City of Fridley, as follows: That it is in the interest of the City to award bid contracts for the following: NATURE CENTER VISITOR BUILDING 2. A copy of the specifications for the above described items and materials, together with a proposal for the method of purchase and the payment thereof have been presented to the Council by the City Manager and the same are hereby approved and adopted as the plans and specifications, and the method of acquisition and payment to be required by the City with respect to the acquisition of said items and materials. 3. The purchase of said items and materials as described above shall be effected by sealed bids to be received and opened by the City of Fridley on the 20th day of february, 1980 at 2:00 p.m.. The City Manager is directed and authorized to advertise for the purchase of said items and materials by sealed bid proposals under notice as provided by lari and the Charier of the City of Fridley, the notice to be substantially in form as that shown by Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Said notice shall be published at least twice in the official newspaper of the City of Fridley. PASSED ANO ADOPTED BY THC CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF fRIOLEY THIS DAY OF , 1979. ILLIAM . NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK - MARVIN C. BRUNSELL Publish� �15 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Sealed bids for the construction of a partial earth covered Visitor Center building at Springbrook Nature Center, Fridley, Minnesota will be received by the Fridley City Council. Owner, at City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432, until 2:00 PM, CST, February 20, 1980, at which time they will be publicly opened and read aloud. Combined bids will be received for the following contracts: . 1- General Constuction work including Mechanical Work and Electrical Work. Bids shall be submitted in exact accord�nce with Bidding Documents (including Instructions to Bidders and Proposal Forms) and Contract Documents (including Drawings and Specifications) as prepared by or for Design Consortium, Inc., Architects, 1012 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minn. 55403. Bidding Documents and proposed Contract Documents may be inspected after December 18, 1979, at the office of the Owner, the offices of the Architects, F. W. Dodge Plan Room in Minneapolis, Minn., or through Dodge- Scan Microfilm Service of Minneapolis, Minn., and at Builders' Exchanges in Mir�neapolis, St. Paul, Minn. One set of Bidding Documents and Contract Documents may be o6tained from the Architects by each prime contract bidder upon deposit of $25.00. Each bid shall be accompanied by a Bidder's Bond or a Certified or Cashier's check made payable to the Owner for an amount equal to 5% of the bid as Bid Security. No bid may be withdrawn within 30 days after opening of the bids. The owner reserves the right to accept or reject any cr all bids and . to waive any informalities or irregularit4es in bidding. Nasim Qureshi City Mana er City of Fridley Fridley, Minnesota page 1 of 1 ' 15A T0: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL htARVIN C. BRUNSELL MOVEMBER 29, 1979 APPROVAL OF TRANSFER OF FUNDS - CITY GARAGE On April 2, 1979, the City awarded bids for an addition to the City garage. The low bid for the project was $78,800.00. A financing plan for $78,800 was approved by the Council on April 2, 1979 (see attached letter from Richard Sobiech dated htarch 29, 1979). This plan assumed $42,904 would be borrowed from the Public Utility Fund. The project is now substantially complete. The total cost of the project, including the architectural fees and other incidentals, is $85,553.00. Additional funds are available from the 6eneral Fund makina the total amount to be financed $41,313. Based on the cost allocation formula approved by the Council on April 2, 1979, the cost split would be as follows: Public Utility Fund Share (to be transferred to the Construction Fund) (20.5%) General Fund - 1978 Budget General Fund - 1977 Budgei To be financed over a three-year period by borrowing from the Public Utility Fund at 8% interest Total The payment schedule will be as follows: Year Principal Interest 1980 �12,725 1981 13,743 1982 14,845 $41,313 The split of the financed Park 33% Street 44 Shop 23 100% $3,305 2,287 1,188 $6,780 Total $16>030 16,030 16,033 $48,093 amount is as follows: $17,540 20,500 6,200 41,313 $85,553 � 16 RESOLUTION N0. - 1979 AUTHORIZING TNE TRANSFER OF FUNDS fROM THE GENERAL FUND AND TNE PUBIIC UTILITY FUND TO THE GARAGE CONSTRUCTION FUND W.HEREAS the City Council has previously awarded bids for and authorized �the construction of an addition to the City Garage, and WHEREAS this addition is now complefe, and WHEREAS the transfer of funds from the General Fund and the Public Utility Fund are necessary to finance the Garage Addition, NOyI, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED that a transfer of $26,700 from the General Fund to the Garage Construction Fund is hereby authorized, and BE IT FURTHER RESQLVED that a permanent transfer of $17,540 from the Public Utility Fund to the Garage Construction Fund is hereby authorized, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a transfer of $41,313 from the Public Utility Fund to the Garage Construction Fund is hereby authorized. Such transfer shall be in the form of a loan which will 6e repaid over a three-year period according to the following schedule: Year Principal 1980 $12,725 1981 13,743 1982 14,845 $41,313 Interest $3,305 2,287 1>188 $6,780 Total $16,030 16,030 16,033 $48,093 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY TNE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS day of ATTEST: MARVIN C. BRUNSELL, CITY CLERK 1979. k!ILLIAM J. YEE, MAYOR ; 16 :. 16 C MIiD10 T0: Nasim td. Qureslii, City bianager �� M1iA10 FROM: Richard N. Sobiech, Public �Jorks Di.rector �; DAT�: Nlarch 29, 1979 SUBJECT: 19unicipal Garage Expansion - Bids for Construction Bids for the construction of t}ie addition to the municipal garage � were received and opened on hiarch 14, 1979. The results of the bidding is noted on the attached tabulation. The low bid of $78,800 by LDS Construction Company remains in excess of the amount of $45,000 to $50,000 oribinally estimated for the project in 1978. Even though the low bid is in excess of the original estimate, it is felt the•bids received are competitive, properly indicating con- struction costs for the project. Bui.lcling codes relating to energy and handicap reqtiirements together tivith the inflatio�i spiral and small size of the project appear to be tne reasons for the difference between the original estimate and the bids received. With L'�e Uidsreceived and the knowl'edge that inflation is not likely to decrease, tne need £or the project must Ue carefully reevaluat�d. to deternine if coustruction should proceed. As previously discussed, the �roject Vras based on the need for addi- tional restroom facilities and opera.tions space. The fact remains that the one restroom facility existing must be shared by both men and women. In previous years with only male maintenance personnel, the one facility ti•ras adequate. Hoiael�er, in recent years, £ull time, part-time and temporary female personnel have been hired. Also, with the existing faci.lity on the second level, the City has a public facility which restricts ase by the handi.capped. Tne need for additional operations space supervisory function; and, lunchroom and the maintenance persoimel. is for improvement of the locker room facilities for Presently the f.oremen and clerk/typist operate fror� a remodeled storage roor� at tiie municipal �arage, r�iiile tlie superintendent and maintenance division secretary operate from the Ci��ic Cen*er. There is much travel time and eneroy consumed wiiicli could be recluced �+�itn tlie entire r,taintenance operntion centralized. Also, �.itli tlie centralized operation, Uetter coordination tietwecn the maintenance sections could be realized. The existing lunchroom and lockcr room facilities are generally ero�Jded unless sliifts are iutplenentes and specifically overcro�,•dcd when tcmporary and part-ti.mc cmj�loyccs arc hirccl during the suutmer montlis. Tn ordcr to liavc iaairitcnancc divi.sions mcetings a�id training sessions, the personnel rtust meet at tiie Civic Center. Dicmo to N. Qureshi -2- 3/29/79 From the above discussion, it is fclt tiiat thc need ior the project still exists and, if the costs continue to increase as they liave, tlie project should bc completed as soon as possiblc. A suggested method of funding thc project is as follo�as Encumbered iunus from 1978 budget Amount to be funded by L'tility Fund Amount to be borrocaed from Utili.ty Fund Total �19,821 16,075 42,904 $78,800 16 D � Tlie amount suggested to be funded by tlte Utility Fund is based on the existing percentages of use of the existi.ng municipal garage space by the Sei,�er and l,�ater sections (20.4 a) . Tlie suggestion to borrow money irom the Utility Fund 1,�as selected ti+�itli the knoiale�ige that the mortgage for the initial construction of the garage Sai1T be �aid off iii 1979. Therefore, tlie folloiti�ing scliedule to repay the Utility Fund at a rate of 6% for 3 years �+�ill continue the present level of spending in the Buildings and Structures Account (.4510) z•rithin the PuUlic works Alaintenance Badget for an additioaal 3 years. Year 1930 issi 1982 Interest $ 2,267.31 1,419.72 520.11 4,2U7.14 Principal $13,512.69 14,660.25 14,431.03 42,904.00 Total Payment $ 16,080.00 1G,OR0.00 14,951.14 ' 47,111.14 i'ditli the previously described needs and the antici.pated coutinuous increasc in constructimi costs, it i.s requested that the City Council consider a�<<arding the contract for the construction of the addition to the municipal garage to EllS Construction Company at tlie regular meeting of April 2, 1479 tiaith construction casts to be �aid as sug- gested. RNS/jm FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY LOUNCIL - ESTIPIATES December 3, 1979 E.D.S. Construction Company 360 Larpenteur Avenue West St. Paul, MN FINAL Estimate No. 7 for Municipal Garage Addition Project Dawson Construction Company 1803 South Ferry Street Anoka, MN 55303 FINAL Estimate No. 2 for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Improvement Project 128 Comstock & Davis, Inc. 1446 County Road J Minneapolis, MN 55432 FINAL Estimate No. 2 for engineering services and general supervision for Sanitary Sewer and Strom Sewer, and Water Improvement Project No. 128 (6reat Northern Industrial Park) Services Rendered by Inspector for Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer and :dater, Block No. 9, Great Northern Industrial Center Through 11/10/79 Patch Erickson Madson, Inc. 2311 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55405 FINAL Estin�ate for services on Addition to City Garage A. J. Chromy Company and Western Casualty Insurance Company � 7,929.98 $10,445.55 $ 1,533.43 � $ 134.61 297.91 Sewer and lJater Project #114 $46,�91.05 Court Ordered Payment ., November 28, 1979 To: Acting Public Works Director City of Fridley REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR MUNICIPAL GARAGE ADDITION PROJECT I, the undersigned, have inspected the above mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complete in con- formity with the plans artd specifications of the project. All instruction books and operation manuals for all mechanical devices have been received, and all deficiencies have been corrected by the con- tractor. So, therefore, I recommend to you that the City approve the attached Final Estimate for the contractor. ��,�� 1/�.,��,-_ RALPH VOLKMAN Superintendent of Public Works RV:ik Attach: 2 APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT � ARCHITECT'S . +" B N0. � � DATE��79 COMM. NQ. � � • - - ro��ITY OF FRi(ll FY , oWNER, This Application is for Final oavme,,, fo,_ General Construction work done on your A�DIIION TO FRIDLEY GARAGF proiect from�79 to 9/30/79 DESCHIPTION Oi PROJELT WOflK ITEMS CONTRACT COMPLETED COMPIETED BALANCE AMOUNT THIS PEPIOD TO DATE TO FINISH Bond 1,000. 1,000. General Conditions 6,000. 6,000. Oemolition 525. 525. - Earthwork 6,200. 6,200. Concrete 3,000. 3,000. Masonry 10,135. 10,135. Structural Steel, Steel Joist and Metal Deck 4,300. 4,300. Carpentry 800. I 800. Finish Carpentry 1,100. 1,100. Roofing and Sheet Metal 4,940. 4,940. Caulking , 466. 466. Hollow Metal & Finish Hardware 672. 672. Wood Windows 2,571. 2,571. Glass & Glazing 270. 270. Gypsum Drywall 4,000. 4,000. Ceramic Tile & Marble 483. 483. Acoustical 249. 249. Special Coatings 550. 550. Signs 450. 450. Toilet Accessories 349. 349. Mechanical: DWU Above Ground 550. 550. DWV Below Ground 3,850. 3,850. Domestic Water 1,300. 1,300. Fixtures 700. 700. Setting Equipment 3,500. 3,500. Duct Work 8,725. 8,725. Registers & Grilles 750. 750. Insulation 2,500. 2,500. Controls 700. 700. Balancing 200. 200. Core Drilling 725. 725. Electrical: Fixtures 2,630. 2,630. Switchgear 1,670. 1,670. Feeder & Branch Circuit 2,890. 2,890. Permit 50. 50. OriginalContracl7otals ]$ 800. 78 8D0. AAdChangeOrdersTOtals G-1 499.8 499.89 Deducl Change Ortlers Totals , f TolalstoDate 79 pgg,g � g 29g,gq � Less Retaina e at � � °% Q.QQ CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT � 7otal to be Orawn to Date Based on our observations, this app�ication for payment is Totai Previously Certified correct to lhe best of our knowledge, and the contra Amount Now Due is entitled to the indicaie mem -� S ��g2g. gg Project cheeked 6y � =L�'1�-C•�t ..:.t�(/1f� This is to caetily I�nt all wo.k lieted above has bean compleled in eccordance wi�� convact documenn ��74!'�'2-°-�-- end that all lawlul char9ea for labor, marenal. elc.. for w�ich Previoua eer4tice[es have Oaen lasued, . � heve Eeen paid. Th' torm hecked by_ Fatch Erickso Madson inc. �NS C f I N' � Archltecls 3 Planners Contrac:or_ __ ___--� ,�� N V la Bou .v� rJ. M:nnvapohs. • tu 5"0• � I . ,v� � p! (�j � ,� ev- _Date�'✓_=�_� � _ By "�� _ _ ate�30L79__ y ia - 3y t� �: Edward eefiy - � �-� �,. CEDARLEAF CEDARLEAF WNDELL HOOKER SLATER, Jr. LARSEN OOUGHEHTY � ��SIINfi)N� � i �� ° � ��,-� ��V:i µ�s''�A��' .AOUR� p.i.,.:.i, jy M1GENi ..... ........ . 18 C CEDARLEAF, CEDARLEAF 8z CEDARLEAF, INC. � 360 WEST LARPENTEUR AVENUE • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55113 •(612) 088-6666 SURETY BONDS AND INSURANCE October 12, 1979 City of Fridley, Minnesota Gentlemen: The undersigned E.D.S. Construction Company, contractor for the construction of Municipal Garage of Fridley, Minnesota, requests that you release any or all of the total reYainages earned on this job. � ' Witness; E.D.S. CONSTRUCTION MPA � { `� '�C_ �`, BY \ � C. Edward Sheehy � President The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, surety under its Bond Number 12-1043-79 executed on behalf of E.D.S. Construction Company, dated April 4, 1979, in the penalty of $78,800.00 covering the construction of Municipal Garage of Fridley, MN, note the aforegoing request of E.D.S. Construction Company and hereby gives consent as surety to the City of Fridley, Minnesota to release any or all of the total retainages earned on this project. The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company further agrees that the action on the part of the City of Fridley, Minnesota shall in no manner operate to qualify nor invalidate the bond. Witness: UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY . ��n��%,� B 7� � Susan M. Cunningham Attorney-in-fact CC - H,D.S. Construction Company 1 j 1 'r ; � �„ :I November 19, 1979 T0: Acting Public Works Director City of Fridley REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR UTILITY PROJECT N0. 128 I, the undersigned, have inspected the above mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially com- • plete in conformity with the �lans and specifications of the project. All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduc- ed price has been agreed upon by the contractor. So, therefore, I recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE �or the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond starting from the day of the final inspection, that being December 3, 1979. ` l.. L (�. �- 4 V' y= �� ZENTGRAF Construction Inspecta ' DZ:ik COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyars 1446 County Rd. J MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55432 70 City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. � ��--.. � ..- . GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Capy of letter COPIES i DATE � NO. �r�� o� �aQa�r�o��a� �X Atiached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Pcints � Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Change order ❑ . THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approvai ❑ For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE DESCRIPTION ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Rpproved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ 19 __ _the following items: ❑ Specifications ❑ Resubmit copies for approvai ❑ Submit_copies for distri6ution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRIN'!S RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS We are submitting this to you for payment. COPY TO _ _ COMSTOCK & DAVIS, INC. SIGNED: iaRMaao4 n.anoDbrmm(tii•nS?mc. re.�meno.Mecc. P�aO �� eO°�OSY�ea sre not as noteC, kinEly nolily us a! ouce. i: � . COMSTOCK & DAVIS, I;VC. Consult'ing Enoineers 1446 County Road ^J^ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 Aate October 30, 1979 T0: Honorable Mayor and City Council c/o Richard N. Sobiech, P.E. City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 Ladies � Gentlemen: Contract Item SCHEBUL& A - WATE�itiIY 8" D.I.P. 8" x 8" x 8" Tee -:'8=' x 8'" x 6" Tee 8" Gate Valve 8" Plug Hydrant With Gate Valva 18" Steel Carrier Pipe B - 10" P.V.C. 28' - 20' Deep 10" P.V.C. 20` - 22' Deep 8" P.V.C. 0' - 12' Deep 8" P.V.C. 12' - 14' Deep 8" P,V.C. 18' - 20' Deep Extra Depth Manhole Drop Manhole 0' - 12' Deep Standard Manholes 0` - 12' 6" P.V.C. Service Lines 8° Plug Estimated Quantity 1,030 L.F. 2 Each 2 Each 4 Each 2 Each 2 Each 40 L.F. 83.37 L.F. 295 L.F. 430 L.F. 220 L.F. 43 L.F. 16 L.F. 1 Ea. 3 Ea. 132 L.F. 1 Ea. CO�TRACT Unit Price , 18_F i � � RE: Water, Sanitary Sewer 6 Storm Sewer� Improvement Project 128 � City of Fridley Job 7921 , Fridley, 2[innesota i Dawsoa Construction, Inc. Contracto' Est. No. 2 Per. Ending FINAL October 30, 19?5 WOR'C $ 12.00/L.F. $ 200.00/Ea. $ 180.00/Ea. $ 375.00/Ea. $ 45.00/Ea. $1,000.00/Ea. $ 30.00/L.F. $ 18.50/L.F. $ 22.00/L.F. $ 10.00/L.F. $ 12.-00/L.F. $ 17.00/L.F. $ 55.00/L.F. $1,200.00/Ea. $ 800.00/Ea. $ 8.50/L.E. $ 15.00/Ea. � Page 1 oE 3 Quantity This Est. - 30 30 PROGRBSS Quantity To Date 1,344 2 2 4 2 2 40 52.4 322 396 225 43 17.75 1 3 132 1 Amount To Date $16,128.0� 400.�� 360.00 e 1,500.00 �g 90.00 f 2,000.00 1,200.00 , 969.40 7,084.00 3,960.00 2,700.00 731.00 976.25 1,200.00 2,400.00. 1,122.00 15.00 � Contract Ztem SCAEDULE C - STORM SEWER 42" R.C.P. Class III 33" R.C.P. Class II 24" R.C.P. Class II 2l." R.C.P. Class II 15" R.C.P. Class III 15" R.C.P. Class IZ 12° R.C.P. Class II M.H., 8' Dia. (Des. F) Ptanhale - Design F i;anit�le - Design C Pf,H. Castings 7Q0-7 & 712 M.H. Castings 801, 8I0 6 821-B 4�`,'. Plug SCHEDULE D - ROUGH GEtADING Common Excavation ' TOTAL OF t10R!C CONTR.aCT Estimated Unit Quantity Price 427.5 L.F.I $ 51.00/L.F. 160 L.F. $ 31.SOfL.F. 200 L.F. $ 20.50/L.F. 260 L.F. $ 18.00/L.F. 92 L.F. $ 16.00/L.F. 70 L.F. $ 15.00/L.F. 93 L.F. $ 14.50/L.F. 1 Ea. $2,100.00/Ea. 8 Ea. $ 700.00/Ea. 1 Ea. $ 6QO.00JEa. 9 Ea. $ 110.00/ca. 5 Ea. $ i75.00/Ea. 1 Ea. $ 150.00/Ea. Lump Sum � $3,000.00/Lump Page 2 oF 3 PROGRESS ity Quantity Est. To Date 1 5 41I.9 157.9 201.4 258.6 90.1 b3 93 1 8 1 9 5 1 iooz 18G ; Amount To ➢ate $21,006.90 4,973.85 4,128.70 4,654.80 1,441.60 945.00 1,348.50 2,100.00 5,600.00 600.00 990.00 875.00 150.00 3;000.00 544.650.00 S SUH:`LARY: Original Contract Amount Contract Additions - Change Order Nos. Con[ract Deductions - Change Order Nos. Aevised Cantract Amount Value Completed To Date riaterial On Hand SUB-TOTAL Amount Retained (10�) Less Amount Paid Previously AMOU,IT DUE THIS ESTL*L+.TE ' CERTIFICATE OF THE COVTR9CTOR $91,528.35 ` . S _ . . � �� . � �� $ in�445.55 , I hereby certify that the work performed and the materials supplied [o date under terms of the contract for reference project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actual value under the contract of the amounts shoc.m on this estimate (and the final quantities of the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and correct and no part of the "Amount Due This Estimate" has been received. I CERTIFICATE OF TN� EDIGINEER Date �� /-/�j I hereby certify that I have prepared or examined tnis estimate, and that tbe . contractor is entitled to paymznt of this estimate under the contract for referenced project. Date ll(10✓ 2 ( i � / RespectfuZly submitted, COMSTOCK & DAVZ INC. By E. V. Comstock, P.E. Pnge 3 of 3 0 �: r � " Cl E1,'t S'i' CD C K �� AVIS� It\!C, CONSULTING ENGltVEERS & LAND SUR4EYORS 1446 Counfy Road J Minneapolis, Minneso�o, 55432 7elephone:bl2-784-9346 In Account With: City of Fridley c/o Ralph Volkman, Public Works Director 6431 University Avenue, NE Fridley, MN 55421 STATEMENT DATE. WORK ORDER NO. � 11/5/79 7921 Please detoch and return this portion with yovr remittance. a �, Aroount Paid I --------------------- -----------------------=-- STATEMENT DATE 11/5/79 WORK ORDER NO 7921 �- Estimate No. 2, Final, for engineering services and general supervision for construction of Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, and Water Improve�nt Project No. 128, (Great Northern Industrial Park) -- -------- ._.. _ Final Contract Price $94,650.00 Basic Fee - 9.1% $94,650 x 9.1� Less Estimate No."1 Amount Now Due. . . . . . $ 8,613.15 $ 7,079.72 . . . . $ 1,533.43 $1,533.43 . Curtent Chorges• � 1,533.43 Previous Bolonce Payments Current Char�es Balonce $1,533.43 PLE ASE PAY $1,533.43 _ SHIS AA1ni INr � Moke all checks payable to: COMSTOCK S� DAVlS, INC. Consuiling Engineers & Land Survayors 1446 Covnty Road J Minneopolis, Minnesota, 55432 Telephone:512-784-9346 Notice: -. CurrenT chorges include interest at the rofa of One Percent {1X) per month, which is an onnual percenToflo rate of Twelvo Percent..(72%), on Bal�nce past due. �> ' �OMSTi OCK �t'j""?�AVIS, tf\!C, fArv� CONSULTING ENGINEERS & IAND SURVEYORS 1446 County Road J Minneapolis, Minneso�o, 55432 Telephone:612-784-9346 In Account With: r �-- � �c. City of Fridley c/o Public Works Director 6431 University Avenue, NE Fridley, MN 55432 STATEMENT DATE 11/12/79 WORK ORDER NO. 7921 � Please detach and reTurn ihis portion with your remittance. � Amount Paid --------------------- STATEMENT DATE 11/12/79 WORK ORDER PJO 7921 Services rendered by inspector for construction of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water, Block No. 9, Great Northern Industrial Center thru 11/10/79 - - - - --- - - '6-1/4 hrs, by R. Moore @$ g,79 x 2.2 $134.61 Current Charges: � 134.61 Previous Bolcnce Payments Current Charges Balance $134.61 P�EASE PAY� g134.61 � THIS AMOiJNJ/� Make all checks payable to: COMSTOCK 8, DAVIS, INC. Consulting Engineers & Lnnd Surveyors 1446 County Rood J Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55d32 Te lephone: 612-784-934b Plo!ice: Current chorees include interest at the rats of One percent (1%) per month, wh+ch is an annual percentage ra9e of T�velve percent..(12%), o� 6alonce past due. � a 18 K � iSTATEMENT � � � Patch Erickson Madson,lnc. Architects & Planners �� 2311 Wayzata Boulevard, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 �"""� ' i October 31, 1979 • �� ! Richard Sobiech Fridley City Hall I 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55421 Cormn: 77� g Re: Addition to City Garage Inv. 427g ! Final fee due: i I 20% of 8% of $78,g00 (constructioFl contract) $1,260.80 8% of $2,963.89 (change orders) ; 237.11 Total fee - Less paid to date - $1,497.41 1,200.00 Balance due - $ 297. 91 Thank You , �/° � F.OR CONCURRENCE BY 7HE CITY CaUPiCIL - Llc�xsEs Decanber 3, 1979 �GEiVERAL COt7TRACTOR � APPEb7VED BY . � � David R. Baerg Construction . � . �. , � 3109 N. 73rd Lane � � � DARREL CLARK �. Brooklyn Park, MN 55443 By: David Baerg ' Chief Bldg. Official Fireplace World � � - � . . � .. ' � 15730 Wayzata Boulevard - . AARREL CLF+RK ' . - Wayzata, MN 55391 By: Gordon Marjama Chief Bldg. Official . The Lauden Company �. . �� ' � . � � , . 2493 - 13th Avenue E. .- � � .. �DARREL CLARK � � ::�orth St. Paul, Mt7 55109 By; Dean Strehlau Chief Bldg. Official Tovsland Remodeling 16310 Olivine Street N.W. � DARREL CLARK Anoka,_M[7 55303 By: Paul,Tovsland Chief Bldg. Official - SIGN ERECTOR �. . . . . . � �.� Fish & LaIIeau Signs Inc. . ' � . - � � � - � � - � - : - � �� 1417 North Washinqton Avenue � • � . �LIARREL CLARK � �� Minneapolis, MN 55415 By: Mark Fisher Chief Bldg. Official � . �. . . . . � �4y..� � . . � . � . w�iQtrNi _ Herbst and Sons 2299 Co. Id�ad Fi � � � . � . . - � � LIARREL CLARK :�. . . Moundsview, MN 55112 By: Dennis Herbst Chief Bldg. Official c n OR. JOHN K. HANSEN SUVE�iIhTENOENi JAA.9ES H. HEDREN DIRECiOR BUSINE.SS AFFAIRS JERFY SEEMAN TIES COOROINATOR 6000 WEST PAOORE LAKF DRIVE. FRIDLEY, MINNESGTl, SSa�2 / 571-6000 November 26, 1979 Mr. Nasim Qureshi, City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N. E. Fxidley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Qureshi: The Board of Education took the following actions which should be of interest to you at their most recent Board meeting: 1. Motion by 5angster, seconded by Lentz, to approve the proposed budget monies from the City of Fridley to District 14's Community Education. All voted aye. Motion carried. 2. Motion by Sangster, seconded by Piarce, to 1et the records show that the acf:ion taken relative to the City of Fridley�s F. E. S. T. program at the Junior High was handled i,n accordance with administrative practices in the district. On the motion, those voting aye: Lentz, Hanson, Pierce, Sangster, Peterson; those voting nay: Stouffer. Motion carried. 3. Motion by Lentz, seconded by Stouffer, that the district wouZd be open to further discussion from the City Council regarding F. E. S. T. All voted aye, Motion carried. 4. Motion by Stouffer, seconded by Lentz, to reconsider Sangster's motion regarding administrative handling of F. E. 5. T. locaticn in order to make the vote unanimous. All voted aye. Motion carried. If you will call me I will be happy to answer questions or give further inter- pretation to the intent of these motions. I think the following item of business should also be ofinterestto you: "City/School Meeting - Mr. Pierce. Discussion followed on the lack of participants at the City;School meetings. Normally a meeting would be held in December, The Board directed Tom Mylira to make the arrange- xnents for a meeting somet;ine in January." ,J -� ?„ ",-' . . , '.)i�.�GO%>C•�ti.k:'. ��-�� c� c��r 8431 UNIVERSITY AYENUE N.t., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 TELEPHONE ( 612)575-3q50 October 22, 1979 Dr. John K. Hansen, Superintendent Independent School District No. 14 6000 blest Moore Lake Drive Fridley, I•1innesota 55432 Dear Dr. Hanseh: In response to your instructions, the Mayor and City Council have directed me to detail our concerns as relate to the following; (A) Request from District 14 Community School to tiie City for paymen± of use of Parkview School building; (B) Denial of Junior Nigh Scho�l use for plarned Fridiey Evening Special for Teens (F.E.S.T.) Program by school administration The City Council believes the taxpayer/voter expects the various tax-supported institutions to sha;�e facilities �rhenever practicable in order to realize the maximum public benefit from public investments. As more and more taxpayer/voters perceive�themselves as receiving no dir•ect be�efit from their- school taxes as the school age populatior cor.tinues to decline, the Council believes the City's e-Fforts tn vrork with the school administration to p�rogram school faciliiies for the broade� public interest is a substantial contribution in reducing such public concern. Please know tiiai:�ae are philosophicaliy opposed to the paynient ofi a building user fee for public recreation program conducted in publicly owned school facilities. Our relationship and efforts in the past tiave always been based on cooperation and the wise expenditure of tax dollars We feel that establishir�y a precedent of cross-char�ing for services rendered is not a positive approach to our establis}.ed fine working agreements of past years. While we may be sympathetic to the finar�cial tvoes of the community education proyram, inflation anc+, derriands for additional services have also p7aced added stress on our bud9et 7in�itations; therefore, �r•e are very �•eluctant to stai�t a building user fee payment, lde do, ho�,�ever, wish to coiitinue the fine spirit. of cooE�eration and atould offer, con- tingent upon the continued use of the Junior Nigh Schaol for teen pro- gramming on Friday evenin9s, (1) to pay School �istrict 14 50% of fees collected by the City from the participants not residing in the School District 14 boundaries for City recreation programs conducted in school facilities. This would be our . preferred choice as it would help the School District . in providing additional funds plus avoid any potential criticism that the people outside the District 14 boundry get a free ride. (2} If the above choice is not acceptable to the school district, then we would provide assistance to the District 14 community education pro9ram by means of partial salary support for a building coordinator. We, therefore, would offer financial assistance to the community education pro- gram in the amount of $5,000 per year for a three year period beginning in 2980 depending upon the City's con- tinued use of the schools as in the past. With respect to (B) above, we offer the following: Although we ap- preciate the fact that some school administrators helieve this activity to be "too sophisticated" for this age group, our staff has difficulty in comprehending the fact that the Junior High School facility was denied with a recommendation that the same activity be held at Parkview School. If an evening of basketball, volleyball, floor hockey and dancing for 7th, 8th and 9th graders is not a desirable activity for one location, why t�ould it be acceptable ir, anoiher school facility? The Council shares the Board's coneern over the point that the �oard of Education is beinq "blamed" by parents for the conduct of F.E.S.T. If this is true, the City, of course, aiants to take strong measures to rectify that situation. lde assume that if the school is being "blamed" for the event, it is also being given "credit" foi- the event by the hundreds of parents who approve of it. The City Council agrees with the 6oard that this should be clarifi ed if it is indeed not now clear in the public mind. This program has been conducted for approximately two years without a major incident. Please see the attached participation fact sheet oui- lining the various teen activities and participants for tf:at period of time. Should teens of this age group be denied the opportunity to par- ticipate because a suitable facility has been denied access? l�le hope not! With these facts in mind, we respectfully request that school bourd mem- bers reconsider tfie receo�iendation for denial as put forth by the school district administrative sub-coim�iittee on supervision. Finally, the Council wants �o underscore their sLrong desire to work constructively titi�ith all fou�- school jurisdictions in the City. They have been gratified by the cooperation we have received from DisCrict 14 0 ]5'7C Jarr. 73 Jnn, 27 Feb. 10 Fcb. 2�1 Ma r. 10 t4ar. 31 A��r. 21 FM1ay 12 f•lay 26 Au9. 25 Sep. 22 Oct. 27 D•�c. i 7E:ilt P(i0c;rr,!�5 f1(iU ld.:TI 1�!'l�i •• 1979 hANC,r fEST FE S"1' FI:ST f� E S7 FL5'f F[ST CESi' FEST FGST FE57 F[ST FEST FEST ?y{�fi Cand Disco Ganr! E;and Uisco Disco ttand Disco Disco Band Disco Band Disco , nnc�Ti r.� �>n�a�s 335 7.L'0 325 334 327_ 311 310 364 �n� 275 339 19h 255 197II l;ttendance ................................ 3IIIIII Dances - 13 Average - 299 live 6and ;Fverage) - 295 Disco (Averzge) - 30?. 1979 J�n. 12 Jan. 25 Feb. 14 I�ar. 2 Apr. 20 . l��ay . lII Jun. 20 pA�t CE FEST FEST hf-_5"f FEST FfST F[ST FES7 TYPE Disco Gand Di sci� Di s co t3anJ Disco Disco ' PARTICTPP,t;75 340 28II 252 315 362 256 220 1979 Atfi.�ndance ............................... 2033 Da;;ces - 7 Average - ?90 t_ive Dard (f�verage) - 325 Disco (Average), - 276 T�T,^,'_ :.97F-1919 e Attendance .................................... 5921 Daiices - 20 (l.i�� 6and-u Disco-12i ' Averag�� - ?_96 Li��e Cand (/tverane) - 303 Disco (A��ayc) •- 291 �g%� �7Ri('S ' 'PIV2T1 C.Tf'A�;7S feb. 1'7 Jun. 1G �1�i1 . : G Oci:. ]�1 Sno-t.ui,in;) Na,ti�ridc 14t1 l o)' i[t i r ll�ai 1 ri d:: 37 G 23 - . ?.O as��ft n�j�>�,�i,��,�� .............:...................... .�c •�l•iptt � Q . n��,�,�,,��„ .. ?�.� , � � '.. ^C01: �.1 I�i��,�l.. 0 21E :. t:i�fl.[Clif Iti(1 f0i', u��: rn� :;ci„�ui. � ncri_z � i�s oC Apiilii:�iiti_._,_�__ CiI,V of,(ricil,^.Y__._._-.,----•---------' . ;,S f,�'1 Univer^;L,� P•.vcr�:�o {l.�., i:i:icllr:y _ ___________ _.__ _ _— - -- hone 571•�3A5G _ _ uf Crgan�i:��icm Rc;�rrsentcd I'arf�, !'ecrcat:ion and t�atvral Resnui•ce Dr.pa�"tm{'nt ,�� Fridley Junior Niyh Sctiool Girls CTi'cf:eria X C)�ssrou,n�_ ;;�nasiu�n X _Aud�i�o�°it�m __.__ ---- p;r,ent I;ecdcd: Rosti-uai�. Chairs Tablcs__.�'�ano___ ounc; Sy:tc.^.i_ _ �Special Li9htin9 _ Other �ase no�e tihai: the soimd system and $f^-C7di lir,':itiny at tha fiigh school audiiorium 17l"P. 5�J2C�11�� Li'��Ir1i�U U�1L'1'EitOi"S. . • • • Fridays, 9/14, ?.0/12, 10/}6>j�o dr;urs ar•e to L•e open 6:30 - 10: ;0 o.r�. � cT Eve�ii: 11 16,_11L28, 1? ;�4 ofi kci:i��i ;�, A�.'•:.Cild�:�,�� F_E.S.?., T 3no /P� 1 ' �� ur,��ersigred, d i"P-5lC�Cl�;�:i.ct., Sc;�c:��l l)�`� � �; L � I �i5 1"°_570:!S1U�i7'li.)\'i��'. i:.ln'�Oi, rl�l�:: ti 1�1 i �/L� �� r •,'•. ,;4, ctlatC D�r,ces and {Icti �U�� `, ` J ��}�'� , � ti, r., c;;`1� �;;�'I be in charge of i.i;-�s aetirity and � \, � ,,�,�, �;��, � , -�! . � �, � "� Q : � � �� , ��vi /�/t � Uai,�,;.; _.s'to sri•,;,o1 ��r ;,e�`\� �j�'' �� / . r�' t,'1�� ;�t. t� ,. �,. ', �� !� � � � � ��, �.:.. �. , � �. � ,i.�� _ , � �N � � �� \�;,t� � ��r /� .�- G� .11 �� T ' � � , � � �� `', ' � ,� � ►' `\�, U �� (�� u � �� t:c ati° i.l;is Ap�,l`ic.ttit�ie;i��..__ --.�.--.._.—�._._.�_._._. , 3a�ic Ri�nl.; 1,_._..._.. Cu 5 t oi?'i :i 1...._. ..___ _.______w._.__ _�. t�1{2C�i.l� �';`I':��111;1�'•�..--'-•.._-°_..�._--•-- �,.��' /�,�...� . . _ _______________ _ tiijn;cimc i�P ;1p��liC.in� . � �i'�� { G 22 MEMO 70: Honorable Mayor and City Council MEMO fROM: �Mark Scott, Chairperson Anoka County Communications Workshop MEMO DATE: SUBJECT: November 30, 1979 Interim Public Access Progrartming Report The Anoka County Communications Workshop has now been operating for three months with the assistance of a full-time coordinator. In September, the workshop hired William Loew-Blosser as the Workshop's first coordinator. Will has an excellent background in access, having recently been the Edu- cational Access Director for the East Lansing, Michigan public schools. The Workshop has spent the last three months pursuing a number of en- deavors. The Coordinator has been contacting members of the Fridley com- munity, as individuals and groups, to inform them about public access and opportunities it presents. To support this information drive, the Coordi- nator has been training individuals in how to use video equipment. The Workshop has found that there is interest in what public access is and how people can use it. During the next three months, the Workshop hopes to tap this interest, getting more people involved in public access and more programs produced. The support of the community and Northern Cablevision has made the last three months a success. The Workshop now looks forward to broadening its contacts in the community. Part of this effort will be to contact businesses, organizations and cor- porations in the Fridley community for monetary support. At this time, I feel the Workshop has proven that there is a viable interest in public access, and has developed a firm base to grow from. The Workshop must now start planning its second six months. We are concerned about our budget, and would like to know what level of support the City wili provide in the future. • The Workshop is currently generating funds throu9h cl and membership dues. During the next three months, c and the membership drive will be continued; but the s and the community is essential. I think the Workshop port in the community, and we thank the City for the ready provided. asses and workshops lasses, workshops upport of the City will find this sup- support it has al- Enclosed is the Coordinator's Report and the Secretary/Treasurer's Report. MS:ik Attach: 4 , 22 A Treasurers Report for period September l, 1979 to November 30, 1979 Income City of Fridley Cormnunity Education Dues Expenses Wages, taxes, insurance Operating expense (printing, telephone, postage supplies) Cash Flow _ Initial balance Deposits Expenses Ending balance Respectfully submitted /� en�V�.��nrk�..-. MS Kenneth Brennen Secretary/Treasurer Anoka County Communication Workshop a $8,000 180 75 8,255 $2,453.20 491.29 �2,944.49 $ 23.75 _8.,255.00 2,944.49 $5,334.26 COORDINATOR'S REPORT • During the past three months, the Workshop has spent considerable time in informing the public a6out public access TV and the activities of the Workshop. The Workshop has been enthusiastically received by the City and the schools. I feel there is a genuine interest in public access. The Workshop has been educating individuals and groups in the use of video equipment. I am currently teaching a ten-week TV production course through Fridley Community Schools. Members of the class have produced several programs for access, including: "How-to TV", "The TV Camera", cable casted live, the Second Ward City Council candidates debate, and a regular series, "The Movies". Northern Cablevision and the Workshop are jointly sponsoring an Explorer Scout Post as a means of involving high school youth in access TV. The Post is aiready producing program- ming. There also has been a number of individuals trained in using video equipment. • During the next three months, the 10-week class will again be offered as a credit TV production class through Anoka Ramsey Community College. A series of one-day workshops are also planned. As more people are trained in the use of equipment, more progra�mning can be expected. The Workshop has received excellent support from Northern Cablevision. ' The Cable Company has provided a studio, technical expertise, equipment and office space. To increase the visibility of access programming> the access ahnetworkachanneledmorempeopleeare5likelyatoefind�the access ehannelnext to There was a successful membership meeting and telethon in November. Tfie meeting was cablecast live. During the cablecast, nine calls were received , fram viewers. Two other live, impromptu viewer surveys resulted in seven callers one night, and nine another. We feel that a si9nificant number of viewers are represented by the callers. The Workshop has built a solid base from which to grow. Since September, the Workshop has been in contact with 375 people; over forty people have re- ceived instruction in how to use equipment. There have been 44 programs produced. Programs have been scheduled on the access channel for 54; hours. The access studio has been booked for 26 tapings and seven remote produc- tions. This shows an impressive increase in access programming in the last• . three months, over virtually nothing in the previ.ous three years. _- Uuring the next three months, the Coordinator will be scheduling speeches at local civic organizations. Efforts wi11 be increased to educate the schools. churches and businesses in the opportunities to produce program- ming. The Workshop will be looking for more opportunities to meet indivi- duals and inform them about public access. ___ _ _ _.. A solid base for future growth has been established. I have personally.seen an access channel grow over a five-year period from nothing to a staggering , 1300 programs per year. That growth on a system with 5000 homes in East Lansirg, Michigan, was achieved through consistent effort and support by the Cable Company, the City and the community. � V Q� S V � V W • C) TI�Kr � J�O � � � � 6 N 1 O I � fD N V � V Vl i � W 7.f3'1 O �� ..A J Q O 1 Y V 1n O O � W O 1 Ol ? O �-+ v D O+ 3 3 E c'� f'� � �"' o �+-s��minm000� a o n o��n��UF33F orrw o� � o�n .•.v m�n c.�+ a o 0 0 � � J�� 3 � � N ip I O � a � � 7cA � � O � � �n A W O �� A 3 � � J � N J�. W O Z O � N 01 z 0 < .� V Z O < N O Z 0 < N � N"O W � N."O �V T(") V � V T(n01 "PI� A -IZ -"s w�-r c+ -s cn c+ coI0 0� �•• . cu a, a •' c o �.-� wrrmwmw .r.yr -�o ��.w �.�0 m< a z �o o cn a�< nl�+o (zl�,v, -�o �.�a o ry a fD �• J 1 fD /D "S 1 r'F 1 O V -' � v � IA .A N 7 fD .p7 . � 7rG W v f P� V � N 3 W �p �-+ w(J (D i-` H 0 W 7 O 7 (T� O � 7 O O O (N� V'�'I W I3 N V � 2 V 7 O iN � J.O (D O A In 3 W � T. fl- O � Vt J(D O 1 3 � � oo w � -n •• � o z o° � c�r, -i CT� N "O Ln .'O � � y �. .p. S .• et �• (D O row o � amw �� o cn a rr o _ � 3� �. -i 7 •'S 1 J In J> O V (D �• � 3 (T J .. N � W F-+ W fD O � � � � . �� I� � V 4� �'T7 61 J. • .. . I(D �n A+ O �IQ N O tn e-F O � 3 Qe N v '�S '�5 ' � � W I O O 0 2 O < N � a 0 < N l0 Z O < W O n n W r m � n 2 Z i � N Z O < N � Q fD z Y � ct S t+ O Z O < fD 3 V N Z w 0 �+ 3 � T N V 3 w • •JQ � � 'S V N W O �oo �� _ �. � ", �. tC � G � O �� (hp � W 3 7 O J ' � � � � � o m a w 7 7 O � T N V �S 01 (D • W j .. n�.°o 0 n � � � fp J V � V W C] O p S O Z 22 E 0 < Y-� N C") � W r m c� O D � Z Z � m w r N � fD Z no � < m �n r fl. A l0 T N V I� N v ( r+ ---I V � 01 � 7C A 5 Z Z r+ O 3. O S•• WO � 7 O 'S < (] J• -5 W O d�--� 7 fD O � � fl' f' 1� � r- j� u�i 3� c"� � �� p, N � lD J 00 �• V � v �� . N fT� N � �. N � h+ ff O W � 3 cn O O 7' O � O � 1 f w N n � N 7 1a � d i"�' O n S N 7 7 ro � r N Z . O < N 3 v m � ►� N r'F 3 h O Z O < fD 3 v � � .� � �+ � C� C'1 C7 3 V 3 C C+ d W (y� �O w � z � n w m o � � �. �N N (� J �'� � f�C'f� C��N V TC")01 � �C� --10 � °cl�+o..w �'.a w �.� o m K a'3 �<< � I'S �'"�y, ° �_ � �n � n � � � a o a-% �� p'� � ao 0 0 N (WI.'O N V � � v � � !�D O ao�•• W j� 7 N O W d�.p O L1Li7 O /D � � J v y v d F+ w W n o °' 0 o so 2 S�--I V 'T1 N Vl 2? T�'� �.Z o,oms•• -scro � °' �o �o m w ai fD °o n �• o � o �• o -s < V1 f0 2 I �� 1 N w o�Di :� r° �::' o°i ::' `^ F.' w r 3 Q M-� W n O W � cn o �' o � 'TlN V O� 01 ITC�01 �.�. TZ �. � o o n cn �'�w w o � n .o �a o ° 'O -' n' � � T`rt o� o.i� cai n� � � � y .. Pi W J.O (T� f) (J p. 3 O O S O (") (") V c <-r w 3 O n J� J z 0 < � -r� 7C A °'�o cz J. o m o � � N G vi .p n w w rn 0 T V1 V � 01 'Y C+•• W �• j O a�o �o ro j v o � N W n O O S O 'T7 N U1 � A � � p �. Y p W � 3 O Cl.�•O � � n 1 f'1 1 � fD �f cn O cn v� A �. w <.;� � o W o �o 0 Z O < V � T N V IC"fl---I 01 ITIC7 01 2? T wT �'.ww �o �z �. j o � m cn o �. p 0. �° �.� ° -s ,-�,r p c� i a< m J� wGV rn oa °'�o w o �v+ nw 0 0 0 �o n a w r m C'7 n z Z m r N t.Tl 0 c� �+ 0 ff m z N t0 c't S O 2 O < 3 � N � � �' 3 io n v Ic �-r w 7 O �� Ivmv �-i� 'xrn o, �... z o • � w �? O �.00 �O � �' V t'' C V a V p •• � N fl O . N W O S O � (v m 0o E v !2o j V (n c'9 rn �-i 3 O� S? w�� y �.. c, o� c� Z Vf W � W �I C+ O �I'S A. I7I� W � W � 7 O fD O d O O_ N O O[n (D � O � �� -+ I � O I C') � OD � Co � � V 3 V f m y cn N.P 1 w 0 t�Tl 7' o O (D W � � 0 Z Z (7--{ V Cl-1 V ."ON V N� J� �� A+S•• ZO•• 03• N'S •W W ImI� o �n<o +3 �o �+�cao �O fU G V Ct C V � V 3 (D V O(71 .z, <. .. a.. i;,� �..:. o n o ca'i, o � o o � o C') C) V p �. C CF W 7 O J� � C")C�nIN V N D �• 3 • -� 3 C r+ d W N �C� �� d �. N l0 N J n O N � V NI�� V � � J� no h�c-°o 0 � pp � fD V � V N O O S O Z (")1ry (") N V 4� "*1 V � 01 C� --i O� T 7C A p� �. 3•• I J�. .. W.. N 3.. Ai �. .. 7 C r'F n. W J eT O W � (D 1--� � 7 O 0. N O -'• O (D (n � O n J �� 1 n i � C� � N A Ll I • N N fD fD V V a -� -s -5 -s . •• •• � no � o °o 0 0 N IwIA� � A C+lO c+ •• N 3 N o W W 6I4 � O O N 1 C'� 1 V O tT a w � o O 3 O 0 n' r+ (7'i 0 � n �r w .. m rn c� � z z m r O N ('f tl� �F t-� V O n �+ r � O n K � O n r+ N N O Cf h N W � � � N A O n f'F N � �'1 O 'S f7 �. � < 01 O n K O a m � r-� � l"�' � 0 0 � rr O P fD S N � C'1' S �=o� am� .I�.I�� N � N N _ �fD W 7C 3 O N V O V ' (,J `t N W fD W Z , �� 'S N W F? O 7'.P N W Z M N V O n O� V i�� _�� ° N O 'S � fD �.O 3-Y � c+ � m v N �'' O � —1� V �'O01 3 fD •• O fD fD O O �S O W p r+ O 3� � P+ � � (p (p V 'a �D V N a �. W FRoO a � o 0 w 3 p o O � n n �+ w � � � �� W � o c o � 3. o m � m � 1 N f'h �„� � �. W N 2 w Z O Z m . r � N f=p � C O � (a 3 f� O (D t+ (") � N O V d W o, w n o S O � W �� A C O 3 O Z C7 N f+ n � .r � C O CT� V� ? P� A N n o W S O O N f7 'Ti V S Ql S.A (D • N • � � .T.+. O W O � O ��(p O U OV O A (/( .. SL N rr ca n o � W O S O � O O n � Ql S-IT01 I � ��.p 3 p n 'S � � a t-r O fD W fl+ � •• � J� (/�% � Q 2� T Ol W CTl I J j lr (Il I.'O N? 3� C7 A O 3 •• �• O 3 •• � �.O in N �G Z(.�Ic+O O a� j��O N m n o o m N�' - 0 3 n-s i <n i v� ��+ a, i r i • m n i O (D � N tn (I� �•.p O Z�A j 3 N �- W. N W N .� 7 A � O e+ O tn 3 vt N O IfNGSV W V J�ir V � d • � • � • J. (p • S S O N O IfD 3� O J. (p 1 N 1 t-f N 1 �} (/) � SL V V SA �(�D W `-` 0 0 � o cn ING2 V ["1—I V O'�5 w 3 N O �• � O fD O � (D 1 i � � ct (n N N C V n s w .-. 0 o cn 0 J w N C 1n O 0 N 1 a o� N r-+ r+ O 'a � Oi D !D •• T O W t-F O ¢� .� 1 � N V o, � � o lW3=v� y p� j .. 3 "5 N • W a� • � o j n i fD V �' � .. o .P � � c J W V1 2 j T r V1 N N �GIZ � C+O O fD (D S O N 1 V1 C' N 1 Sl+ VI � �w � �+ o � r-i = V 'O fTl V v�i � �-+ 'Z N �--� cmcn x-mo i � � N v � V -�+ N E �' O � � W 7 'S Ti.A -i � � C O 3 � o m � J _° n�r N ? � � W O _ � � W Q n � O V w •• n o �o 2A T7CA � W 3 � O O � (") I - 1 O Ul J N A w • �o w so 0 -h V1 V O O � N O 3 'S � (D V H C N f�� 01 f1 O 'S 3 � • W o no o c � 3 fD V N J. • � O Q n {'�' O O n c'F 1�+ O ff c+ N 0 n h 0 v N Z N � d K O O n O a N Z N N � �T 0 � p � � � .'A p v 7�G O 3 W T � n �. A+ V �. J� �• � 3 �� N � O � A a cn z � � � C N O � � w rn � A O O ��.mwS vrA �� ? 3�0 � � �0 �� N N � u� A A W t79 � xrn ry .. W O (7 1 O V N C1 O S O w�� :'' � 3 °o m -�+� c�r, _ � v� � N � T A W �•� p 3 O h N 2 ? fp .. O O n 1 O .P y .. n w �o O (") V IC t'tW 3 O n =: 'O J A �T 7� � wv�w 3�0 J� Q �� O f tn A S A i W W (p W O Z 2 O� ry .. W O G7 I O V w c� o �o Ivmcn '�a w�ca p' w 3 3 O � 1/i O 7C� O �� _� ? tT O fJl N .A o . w •• .. fo no W (p W �' O O � I'O R'I A �2 ? w � Z N W O �c fD O O 3 I C� 1 � A � � O � f W f1 W (p W S O 'f N � : � fi r V N m � �r r � � N � c'f N t0 N m v fi N O �I N A � t-F N A N fD 9 lY N � N rn N N � t'F N V n a w r m n 2 D Z 2 m r N Ul N N V fi N � Q fD T ,--� V e'F S rr 0 N [C � t-� N � � m -s W O t+ S . • :� DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAMS H.S; Speech Class: Two of the speech classes of Gary Zehnder at Fridley Senior Hig have written scripts for fifteen 5-minute proqrams. Some are serious iournalism; others are feature t,vpe interviews with ala.yers and cheerleaders; others are comed.y and satire. Let's Fight Fire: From the fourth grade class of Eileen Stenburg at Hayes Elementary School, we learn all about junior fire fighters. Leaf Prints: Also from the fourth grade, we learn about how the children ma e prints from ieaf patterns. Poetr Readin : From Stevenson Elementary School, the class of Ms Wishart s ows their study of poetry. Pil rim Stories: The third graders of Mrs. 0. Paulson at Stevenson tell us w at they have learned about Thanksgiving. The Headless Horseman: A play based upon the famous Halloween story as performed by Mrs. Stenburg's class at Hayes. Halloween: Stevenson. The camera follows the second graders on their visit to the Lynwood Nursing Home. Fridle,�Community Schools: Explains the history and operation of community education in Fridley. It is a slide/tape program prepared by comnunity edu- cation. • Craft and Fair: Jointly sponsored by the City and cortununity education. Host, au Kapszak talks with the organizers and some of the many crafts people. CITY PROGRAMS Second Ward Cit Council Candidates: In a debate sponsored by the League of omen Voters--the meeting was cablecast "live"_by the TV production class. The tape was replayed also at later dates. fridle Park S stem: Based on a study she did for the League of Women oters, Diane McKusick explains park system plans. Strictl�i Fridley: Produced jointly with Northern Cablevision Productions, C aTi nnel� 3, this public affairs weekly program focuses on civic matters in fridley. Topics covered to date include the City Budget, the City Council candidates, the East River Road project, the proposed NSP power plant and the fire at the Senior High. _LIBRARY Solar for Me? Produced with the Public Library� V!E learn fron� Ned Hoffman a out ways to use the solar heat system already in our homes. Home Insulation: Also made with the help of the library, this program dis- c�TUSSes common pitfalls in insulation with contractor, Steve Nordeen. RELIGIOUS The Kinq's Family: Produced by the Minneapolis Child Evangelical fellow- ship, this series of 15 programs for children is the longest running regu- lar series on access television. Page two DESCRIPTION Of PROGRAMS RELIGIOUS (Cont'd.) Christian Gospel Mission Youth Group: Four youn9 Christians tell Bible stories and sing hymns. PUBLIC ACCESS PROMOTION Second L�vin Room: This tape features a short tour of the studio and emonstration of the cameras. Eisenhower Park: Done in the park next to the Civic Center. We invite the people of Fridley to tell their stories and use public access TV. How-to TV: Learn how to operate a TU camera in this instructional tape produced by the TV Production Class. The TY Camera: This shorter and improved version of "How-to TV" is the second tape from the Production Class. He Coach P,S.A.: A short cortonerciat about access TV done for the Northern a levision Productions "Hey Coach". I'd Rather Freeze: or else make a public access TV program this winter. A umorous promotion of access made by the Production Class. ACCW Membership Meeting: Live from the studio, we played tapes and discussed access with people who came to visit. About 15 people at home called in their comments. MUSIC AND CULTURAL Stone Road Band: Winners of the High School Variety Talent Show, the band eatures their best numbers on this tape.� • Fitzgerald and Flyer: Hosted by Julie Dargis of the City of Fridley, we lis- ten to fine country music and talk with the three rising young musicians in the group. The Movies: With Lowell Atkinson as your film buff and host, will show as a regular series, public domain films from the past. This series started from the Production Ciass. Flags, Past and Present: Featuring the collected flags from America's his- tory, this program was jointly made by the Production Class and the American Legion Post. Princeton H.S. Marching Band: Featuring the State Championship Marching Band in competition. This tape was made by the Fridley uncle of one of the band members. Those Wilmar Women: This program features highlights from the State meeting o t e National Organization for Women, with Bella Abzug. The woman who made this tape became interested in access through an article in the Fridley Sun.