04/27/1981 CONF MTG - 5374_���
�
�
FRI�LEl` CITY COUiJCIL
CO���CRE�dCE �1EET1�•dG
�IP�;I L 27, 19�1
1. �udget Revenue a.nd Restrictions Impact by Federa1 and State
Cutbacks
2. Preliminary Discussion - 1982 Budget
r
Police Qepartment
Civil Defense
Fire D�partment
0
3, Other
.
0
��rC�Cl��, ;�
TENTA7IVE
1982 BUDGET DEUELOP�ViENT SCHEDULE
COUNCIL ACTION
1. Preliminary instructions to City Manager
on budget.
2. Preliminary discussion - Revenues, Police,
and Fire Departments
3. Preliminary discussion - Public Works, Park
and Recreation, Central Services and City
Manager ,
4. Public Hearing on use Revenue Sharing Funds
5. Council officially considers the 1982 City
Budget - including Revenue Sharing Portion.
6. Council passes resolu�tion calling for a�
Public Hearing on the 1982 Budget on
September 14, 1982 (if over 16 mills).
7. General Budget discussion.
8. Public Hearing for budget (if over 16 mills
and for Revenue Sharing.
9. First reading of the Budget Ordinance.
10. Second reading of the Budget Ordinance
and
Council passes the resolution authorizing
the tax levy for each fund.
1305A
TENTA7IVE
198'I. BUDGET DEVELOPP�iENT SCHEUULF
STAFF ACTION
1. Receipt of revenue estimates from Central Services Director to
City Manager.
2. City Manager discussion with Department Neads re: Budget approach
3. Budget instructions and worksheets sent to Department Heads by City
Manager.
4. Discussion by Department Neads and City Manager about budget material
5. Finalized budget written material and cost breakdown material to
City Manager.
6. Budget dollars requested by Department Heads discussion with City
Manager.
7. Balancing revenue with expenditure.
8. Budget recommendation compiled by City hlanager.
9. Mail notice of administrative hearing on Revenue Sharing
(of July 13th).
10. Publish administrative hearing on Revenue Sharing Notice
(of July 13th).
11. Public Hearing on use of Revenue Sharing Funds before City Manager
{administrative hearing).
12. Budget summar�y notice mailed to Sun (in preparation for August 3,
consideration). �
13. Proposed Budget Summary published in Fridley Sun (for August 3,
consideration Charter requirement).
14. Council considers 1982 Budget.
15. Mail notice of Public Hearing on Budget and Revenue Sharing -
hearing on September 14, 1981, before Council.
16. City Manager issues notice to news media of Public Hearing on 1982
Budget for Septemtrer 14 (including minority news media).
17. Publish notice of Budget - Public Hearing for September 14 only on
these dates additionally if proposed budget exceeds 1C� mills
(Charter requirement).
18. Publish notice of Budget and Revenue Sharing Public Hearing for
September 14.
19. Refer resolution certifying 1982 buaget tax levies to County
Auditor.
20. forward Budget Ordinance and Revenue Sharing Budget to official
newspaper for publication.
21. Publish Budget Ordinance and Revenue Sharing Budget in official
newspaper. '
22. Upon request: prepare report on actual Revenue Sharing Expenses,
making it available for public inspection at Civic Center.
1305A
�
� ::�:�
\�.,,.y
1�
I�F:L�}��z�'-��'�� ��.�6... ��:� ��.'J� �f't�C�E'C)S`•;t�
� . � � _ . - � :
r.�ty �t Fiid!cY. , . ftes:w:cs'. - P�i�R�2
F.1i:u�esota . REYF�`7i!E SU''t•'i+RY , �,!icce:ion .
I'•.CC' T 1
r:o_ P�v� :+,� �
ctr;EFr.t. fi!r;`: �_.._._.___.'
� Genera�7 i�r�perty T?x
3011 Tax Le:'iE5-C'1�Y�:1[ �
3Q27 Tax Levies-Celinquen�
3013 1:�r. fcriait Salc AiF.ortic;:
3015 No-��stead Credi�
i 301fi PFaalties & (ri.erest
� .SU�tC,td� ' .
� 3033 Stecial 4�sessr:ents
± ieer.ses , �
3�ilU Contra�iors
3111 S�siness .
• 311? Ozhc:r �
Su�total .
' 312� .°ermits ,
�
� inLergorerr.s,enta] �
� 3314 � C.-E.T.r'1. � .
3315 Civil nefense
'32� Gther Federal Grants
� . 33�t1 S�etc l,�d ctrPFts '
- 3350 Stat_ Snarcd 7axes
- 335� Oth2r State -Gra.iis
•' 3360 ' Sta±e ?ree Scosidy
� . 3370 Loca1 Gra�ts
� 33�1 •�i1;A r.�ir::bu:•se� ent
� � sur*_otai
� ' -
� .
�
; Cha�J�s `or S'ryiceS .
�. ; 35 i 0 Ger.�r-a i�. �-
3�20 Pubi;c Saf2ty
� 3�30 Cons�rvation of Y,eaith
- • E 3550 Recreat:on
-- � Su�t�t�l -
_ ..- � 3510 Fines ar.d Forteitures
. . =; ,
Reven;:a Fron. �Jse of
. - N'or.c_f end F�t�;,�rt�
3II10 Irte��est Earr:ed
�f3�0 • 2ents•
- Subtotal � .
. Niscellaneous
3�4� o o P►ro perty
� •� 3260 �cnat-i�ns • -
3S50 Pol:c „Fire Fension
� Ref+�rr�s
3950.GG1 h�5s�£ila.�eous Refunds
, Subto:a]
' Tr�r�fers Fro^; nih�r
' �Gnc]S u
' 39G?.J1� �� .=e �;:� �:TCcat �;�a �
3U52.011 $_a:e ;,id St:rplus i
3-.0?..01? Fc:c;.�rz► ricverue Sii4rin,
3963.01� knti-Recess�on
� 33G?.035 liq�or
39G? Ott,c: `
S�Giotal
26(?0 � G_�rieral Fund Surplus
1'l�lAl - f:E:''cC;:�rS _ �EI:f.l:Pl SUr�D
,^.�;UAI. P.CTt!..L
REVttr'IJ� �r�ic��i;c
iyi� ��»
t i�7i1
ES.Tl;�rl��G ES�i fi:;,l"tG
EUDSE i ���'Et;UE. P.�ti'E':UE ['.Ui)GET
i�ao i�aa t���i i�st
1,?91,63:I1,90R,;51�1,93c2,dv� i,9'�l,:;Q? ?_,�6�,5"s5 2,26h�P.46
35,4�4 30,9;^.l �a,UGO 32,�00 -�J- 3;,C�Q
11,845 9,3?7t S,QGU 5,GQ0 -0- 10,Q00
301,617 32&,CD3 tiGC;GCO ;�O,ca4 -o- 335,000
7,n3; 5,E99 ),500 3,s00 ?,50� 3,5C�U
2,141,9�7 2,ZS2,'c�4 2,33i,30;; 2,3a^3 ►G3 2,i61;�� 2,�;-'.,�y'b
9,3bi 7,026 S,30c^, 8,OiC� � 8,5C S�50C �
12,375� 15,452 12,500
76,532 i05,784 79,a45
3,?6E, �3,C41 3,`00
92,522 24,282 5�,44;
i37,3�6� 3f,°31 Sa,650
1�,'LGS . -T5,335 iG,�b£s
8�,96� 96,12= 1�5,832
3,GC;; 3,Z5C 3 1.5C
C'o,l'a5 T4,%TC �2F,�5�
EJ,6?C � 91,15 , 104,E22
.
2�{9,3SG 93,:139 -0- -0- -0- -0- ��
5,501 5,056 5,50u 5,�C0 S,�OQ i2.000 i
34,13c °,o9a 9,000 54,200 9,6'J'J 9,6C!.' '�
Z6,2C5 2i�,�'90 2F;.2U5 •2o,�c.�0 26,=::0 • • �c�cCU ��'
�05,499 1,103,291 i,304,25� 1,32�,��� 1,320,�G0 1,320,5�;;1
35,75� 12,556 • i,�C� - 7,3^� 6,600 ��<,rG�a ��
i6,2.�i5 4'Zs�3C I�,OGO i5,00�J 3" 0^v0 32,00^
� 2, 7�8 ,- -0- -0- -0- -0- -C- �` -
-o- � ��, 7?�� -o- �F,o�o io;�co 2o,cc� �� .
1,275,OT? �I;3Ti; �! �1,3� ,ci55 1,5�0,0 0,�� ti,2.. ,� S,�i,;
11,297 12,417 10,9�5 . 12,430 .. 12,4'LO . 12,4�� �� .._
1B,E:ic", 21,415 . 1;,075 � 21,6cG 21,730 21,130
�0,014 14,°7Q 19,250 i�,��4 17,38U� 17,3fiC �
5's,3QG 53,936 5�,J50 55,9�0 53,94Q 64 83�
. 1J4,C-'6�' 103- ,�1 i02,460 iU�,980 110,4��J 1 6,364 '�
85,785 92,375� 35,QOQ 30,OCC - 58,OJ0 •92,�JG0 � l. �
121,635
i1,7�;:
�:�3,3a��
27, 7.2�
12,078
96,[178
7,1���
1<lL,7G'
156,U�51 110,00�� 150.000 17U,000 17G,�JCO
16,355� 11�750 ?�,�?�0 '6,5C0 lo,a�0
1�2,s1�s�-T7, JSO io,liG�J co,:," �, b5,5C'Q
19,72e
4S;�Q�
115,02�
3?.,9"C
2i�;i;y�
hi),G(iG �O,COC
65,QGC° 65,(?0�
i85,52i, 2i7,CCf,
12,1C� -0-
ES,OU(: &5,Oi)C
-G- -0-
3>3,i;,c 4�7,-i,'�)�
---- � -----�-
4,1�iG,G6'.f -0,f;1��,rSl;
20,7501 Z�,C�O 22,20� 22,2Qv
12,000. . 12,�00 15,OQ0. , iS,OQ�:
G6,101 ;i7,i?i10 . �Z�,�J� �2i1,�L�
� 6,F�0 G,Q�•Q iQ.000 i0,p�?�
� ,�sr -� rs�,ccc :�i;-�o� �o�,z��
. � ��
55,Q00 55,0�1�? 55,�i00 EO,��IU. � �
Sb,G'UO 5�,000 65,OO+J 55;0:'��� `
230,UQJ 23�,CQ�� 2�5,O��J t�45,0:,0 �
�-0- -0- -0- -U-
ES�OO�J SS,OCO 58,000 90,OOt7 �
-0- -0- -0- -0-
n.G,00f1 4;'o,Ji��) �53,0� 4� , �
__115,125 -0- 250,C1�10 225,000
4,���",U�1�� �1,973,.�s3 S,GG?.:325 5,571,142 �
, � - __.�.. . �.__ _ .�._._._ `. �
t
� .�.__ ' __ _...�..__...�.. �.._�..........,�.......`....__�......_'.._. ...�.= . �� •,,.,1'.'�Y.r�Ft+•_• :.....r...x(^'1 .nr.�? TyJ : MiI^.�'^,' .,�:��`.� .
,'i
�
i
0
. •
f'C`.f1Ll1TIUIl IlO. - 1a�0 � .
RCSr�LUT1r��� r:, ��l ICr:r,,; �t�;x LEVY ItF�2l;If:4:�•,(:r�7S FOR 19�1 TO 71►4
-`� � Cf�t1I:1Y Gf� l��,�,�:,, ;;,�? CUI.LLC7JGt! .�
�E IT RES(�LE'ED th�� th�� City of Fridley certify to the County fluditor of thc
County of i�.no'r.�, St.:±e c,f �:innesot�, thc foll�ti•�ing tax levy to be levied in
19�U f�r t��e ycar. 1�'<31. �
' GEf�ERP1L FU;iD • � • �
LEVY SUB.i�CT TQ LIfSI7ATI0�� �. . �2,010,938 ' ,
� � __ � .
� . : - . . - - � -� .
- OUTSIDE LE�'Y LIh1ITS: . ' � � . - � :' . ' .
. Item "A" - Jucic�rrents and�Liability Insurance � 41,774 � -
. �ter�t "C" - htatching �unds Programs - .192>>�$
� Item "E" - Sonded Incebtedness (less Debt Ser��ice � •� 5,705 � �
� Fund belo��,) � 253 904
Item "I" - Decreased �•;on-Tax Revenues '- � 5�856
��em "J" - Decreased t�:oUile Home l�ax • . �
Item "it" - Decreased Industrial and �omme.�cial � 156,38� � -
De�elornent . �, � - 1 180 .
� Z�:2ili u�u --. 7aY l`i;)dtC'�•��_'►�tS ' s
It�m "P" = Unfund�d r�ccrued Liabi l�it'y of Publ ic , 16,684
Pension f�unds ��
. - Sub-total , : ,_
T07AL GEf�ERAL �U��D �2, 684, 615
� p'CNFR Fl! ;CS ' .
pebt Service - Civic Center (OUTSIDE LEVY L1��ITS) � 38,�70 �
Capital I�»prove�ient (LEVY SUBJECT TO LIh1ITRTIOP�} A4,770
TOTAL � , �i/,� 55
QE I7 Ft1:7NER RESOLVED that �he ac�ount herein certified��•ritf� respect to. the
public Ecnployee Retire�;eiit Association is in the amount r��quired by the law. -
PIISS�D P,��D �1COPTED BY TNE CITY C01!t�CIL OF TH� CITYOF FRIDLEY TNiS �
p/�l' Or , 19�0. .
. . :
h11lYU: - t�1LL1/1�•1 J. t9EE
� . _
. tiTTCS7:
ti(''i-) i�:c��:��'f�'�i.l:I%� ='ur<1�7T�f.i,r�;1 �Tii
tlt)!�'r'l/t�%; : �1 .
�,
0
N
x
O
:o
—�
-n
�
r-
r
—� �o cn� r-v 7>c�r � w� rn �a m�
4 < =S fL < C O 11. � � C C1 � "'0 � �' "C) �
� ro � -s m �-o � a r*i cn .ru m � ru rn ro
r � -s -�• � m -s --� z cn -s � � -s � -s
c � c -�s � c c-r n, c� c a. w
� ro co � �-r � m __.. .-,
m � m cn � _'.._'
C � '�'! C C -T'I
m --I �-r � � -s c
� X � m lD �
m
Q. (n N (1
v� tt, �y��y� '
� ""A N ��I � y�� µi J ��
0 � J J
.7� N N Ql W .�i _._. � �
� V C31 -P " -P N V � lrJ :C7 �
-t� o� cn o o .r� � sv sL • rn m
.� �. _..+. V1 N
V W O O� CJf V N N ct C+
.t� w o -t� a� .P �D �D • .
N � O Ol O N
' �. J. ►--t 1--1
� � � � � � m
Ul -+ (V .� p� • � � � � x
{� .. � .. .. ,. W N iL W D
W V W N 00 W O' -� c-F' �-1• 'O
O V V N Gn N �! �p �. �. �--
Crt --� O V N O ' C3l I p� O O 1'*'1
v v N � �
(.71 -P 00 00 --+ CJl CO
cn o CO Cn --� • D
0� CJi N O W O W �� _
n n
{� � fD (D
Ol . --� W --� • W SL
� � ° " N N
Oi O -P N O W v � • ��
Ul lfl OJ -� Cp N ..p (tp
N W O -+ O O U't pp J. J.
-' - N CT7 l0 N CJl � W ��
Ol tD Cn O QO �1 N � 07 O�
Ui � N O N p �p W N
�
� �
.A N
V Ql
-t� 0�
V . W
� W
N al
.�
� , ..
I � �.n
1 dl Ol
O V Ol
� .t� �
�M �
W �
b)
� J
V M
I � �W
{ � �
O � �J
�
CJi ` V
-p CO
O 00
N
�A
C7'�
O
O
O
N
N
V
W
�
�
J
�
O
O
N -�
Ol W
-P N
O YO
OQ c3'�
-P . Ol
� O
N Y �
W W
(Jt N
N O
J' (n
J �
iJ.i Q
W � J
� w
Q �
N (Tt
� �
N O'
6A
CTt -� N
-P N N 61
v � -P -ly
-P OJ Cn O
V W O 00
-P (.J O -P
N Ol O t31
. �
� ^' N
i v w rv po
O V V N Ul
� --+ O V N
-R � OD -.�
o a� v, .-•
' tJl N O W
6,q .
� J W
� O .A- N O
O l0 CO -+ O�
� w O --� p
N CT'1 l0 N
�D Ui O OJ
1� N O N
J
W
N
O
CJ7
01
O
J
w
N
O
�.i�
rn
O
�J
W
N
0
Ul
Ql
O
�9
Ul
.P J
V �p
-P �p
--� N N
v O W
�A
N V U1
��
� � �
�"� � �
. J. J.
� -+ N N
� � � �
V �
N �. �.
-P � �
�M
w � �
W N
b9
�
� �J
� I w
W
�
.S�
�
�
� �
-j� .--�
V �
� �
V �
-P
t`v
�
��
v --•
v I�
� �
A N
Y-�'
0
�
b4
�
O --+
lfl � l0
c.) C1�
W
N
�
�
��
o° o
� �
i� sv
J. �J.
N �
!D (D
.�l. J.
a �
W N
��
\ o\°
m
a � �
.J. J.
tn !n '�7
ro � r
.�. �. m
� � �
M M �
W W �
W N
(.Tl U'i
Ol �
o � m
x
x� � '�
sv n� -�
J. J. �
en in r
cn m . m
J. J. �
� _ .. �
� � -
W N
I
T0: . N11SIP+1 M. QURESHI, CI7Y ��IA(J,AGFR
SU[iJECT: REVEfdUE PROJECTIONS FOf� THE 1982 EUDGET
DI�TC: APf;IL 23, 19II1
P{IGE 3 '
�
in 1983.
It is obvious that in order to cover a potential short fall in 1982 and 1983,
it will be necessary to not only look at the level of the General Fund budget
but also to look closely at methods for raising other revenue sources. It
Could be argued that the end resul�Es of the cuts by the Federal and State
. gouernmeni:s may be smaller than indicated at �:his time. But, it should be
pointed out that there is a clear indicatian from both the State and the
Federal governrnents that they v�ould like some level of reduction and certainly.
will not allow for any level of increase in gr�ants and aids to cities. While
it may be sometime before the actual dollar amount of reciuctions are available
to us in their fina] form, I think it would be prudent at this point to begfn
to plan our 1982 Budget based on the p�tential of a high inflation raie
continuing through 1982. and well into 1983 and some level of reduction of
aids and grants from Federal and State governments. -
$� 1 : Sil
Attachment
,
0
I�
70: �dF1SI��l t�1. QURESHI , CI7Y P�1Af�lAGER
SUtiJECT: RFVENUE PROJECTIONS FOR 7HE 19f32 BUDGET
DF1TE: {�PRII_�23, 19£31
Pf1GE 2
involved the II% levy limit proposal. At present, �he City is allowed
to increase �roperty taxes at the rate of �% per year on all home owners
and is also allo�rred to increase pro�erty �;axes on those items that are
"outside the levy limits." According to the neti•� proposal, the entire
amount of property taxes would be subjeci to.a limitation of 8%.: As you
can see on the attached sheet for the fiscal year 1981, the City of Fridley
had �673,677 in property taxes tnai, were outside the levy limit. �ccording
to the propsosal, the amount of $2,684,615 �rould be the amount that could
only be increased by 8%.
5. Otf�er Revenues: It is someti�hat premature to estimate the effect of the
economy and tFie current Sta�:e propasals on other revenues. It is clear�
that most moneys no�•r received for local grants �vill continue to the end
of the grant. Other revenues, such as fines and forfeits, charges for
service�, licenses and permits are somewhat control�ed by actions of the
City Council.
I have attached summary sheetsof the effect on the General Fund budget for
1982 and 1983 based on the prESent projections.
f xample "A" :shows a normal increa�e in the General Fund budget expenditures
based on an 11% inflation raise. Additionally, Example "A" shotivs a normal 8%
increase in other revenues. You will note that if we budget based on the
inflation factors alone with no additional expansion of services, a�e will have
short falls in 6oth our budgets for 1982 and 1983. ,
There are obviously only two mehtods in which to eliminate a short fall. They
are: increase the General Fund�budget at a much sloV�er rate and/or increase
other sources of revenue at a much f aster rate. In checking with the League and
other aduiting sources, it is recommended that General Fund budgets, if possible,
be increased at � minimum of 9%. This rate is recommended in an attempt to
reduce the effect of reduction of government services on the citizens. It shouTd
be pointed out that any increase in the General Fund budget, which is less than
the current inflation, is the equivalent-of a audget cut. For example, if the
General Fund budget is raised 9% while the current inflation rate is 11%, this
equates to a reduction of 2°o in the ability of the General Fund to purchase goods
and services. � � .
Exaii�ple"B" is an attempt to demonstrate,with only a 9% raise in the General F'und
budget, what arould be required in other revenue sources to cover a short fall.
You will note that in order to accomplish this goal, other revenue sources mEist
be raised 23.5% in 1982 and 20.7% in 19�33 for a total of aPproximately a 49%
raise over the current 1981 level. �
Ex�mple "C" approaches the problem from the oti�er direction in that other revenues
are allowed to rise� at the normal 8% rate while the General Fund increase is used
to offset the short fall. You will note that this ��ill only allo4� a 5.4� increase
in the General Fund budget in 19II2 and 5.6% increase in the General Fund budget
M�c;o�r�r�QUr�
T0: NASIh1 M. QURESHI, CITY MIINAGER
FROr�i: SIDNEY C. INf�1AN, CENTRAL SERVICES DIP,ECTOR
SUBJECT: REVENUE PROJECTIONS FOR THF 1982 BUDGET
DA7E: APRIL 23, 1981
The following �s an synopsis of the various factors that could affect our
revenue projections for the 19�2 and subsequent year budgets.
l. Inflation affect upon budgeting: As you are aware the level of inflation
as a a arge a ect on our budgets. It is projected for the year 1981
that the inflation rate should stay bet�veen 10 and 12 percent. It should be
pointed out that historically high interest rates ar rising interest rates
have indicated an attempt in the market nlace to curtail tfie amaunt of
borrowing, and therefore curtail the amount of created capital. Looking at
the increases in consumer borrowing and other sources of borrowing, it apnears
obvious to r�ost experts that no longer do high interest rates have any great
effect on attempts to reduce inflation. Other factors indicate that the
projected recovery of the economy vrill be a longer term than�suspected. For
example, 1arge corporations are still borrowing on the short term market
� rather than the long term market �vhich is an�indication of their projections
that interest rates and inflation will continue to rise. Aelditionally, whiie
the GhP rose for the first quarter in 1981, overall• inventory levels of large
cor�orations has decreased slightly. All of these factors strongly ind�cate
that any recovery from inflation �vill be long term, at best, and we sh�uld
look for continu�d double digit inf]ation for the next year and one-half to
two years.
2. Revenue Sharing: All indications are that the Revenue Sharing allocations
or c�ties wi be reduced for the 1982 and future years in an amount of
approxi;�ately 7.�%. In 1981, the Revenue Sharing amount of $245,000 was
equivalent to 4.�% of our budge�. _ � o
3. Local Government Aid: It appears now that the Governor's office intends to
�oT� �rm on t e re uction of revenue of local government aid using an 8.3�6
cutback for the years 1982 and 1983. The effect of this cutback decision
�vould b� to keep the same amaunt of State Aid for 1982 and 1983 as w� are�now
receiving in 1981. In 19�1, the City received an amount of $1,320,560 which
a�as 24% of the General Fund budget.
4. General P�operty Taxes: The present proposal for General Fund property t.axes
�
� '
ORGANTZED NEIGHBORHOODS
BURGLARY DATA �
0
1 YEAR
BEFORE AFTER DATE HOW LONG
NEIGHBO�:HOOD ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION COMPLETED ORGANI�ED
Benjamin Briarc�ale 14 0 9/31/78 30 mont�hs
North Innsbruck 6 2 5/29/79 21 months
South Tnnsbruck 9 2 9/27/79 17 months
Harris Pond 11 1 11/29/79 15 months
Gardena 7 0 5/35/80 10 m�nths
Skywood 7 1 4/21/80 IO months
Moore Lake Hills 3 2 6/30/80 9 months
North Park 5 1 7/2/81 8 months
Melody Manor 13 8 8/11/80 7 months
Rice Creek Terrace E. 11 6 9/11/80� 6 months
Rice Creek Terrace �9. 13 1 10/9/80 3 months
Locke Lake 2 * � *
Rice Creek P1aza No. 6 0 I.2/3/80 3 months
Holiday Hills 1 0 12/3/80 3 months
108 24
E
* Organization not complete as of March l, 1981.
i
..
I
�
�
EMERGENCY PLAN
CITY OF FRIDLEY
INDEX
Foreward
Definition of Terms
Glossary
Basic Emergency Plan
Civil Defense Ordinance
Organization, Assignments, Functions,
Key Personnel
Emergency Operating Center (EOC)
Readiness Conditions
Warning Procedures
Important Facilities
Operational Reports
Mi2itary Assistance
Radiological Defense Responsibilities
Natural Disast�r Plan
Natural Disaster Assessment Report
Communications Emergency Procedures
Congregate Care Emergency Procedures
Fire and Rescue Emergency Procedures
Law Enforcement Emergency Procedures
Inspections Emergency Procedures
Publ.ic Affairs Emergency Procedures
Public Works Emergency Procedures
Flood Protection Plan
I •
II .
III - VI
1 - 6
TAB A
TAB B
TAB C
TAB D
TAB E
TAB F
TAB G
TAB H
TAB I
TAB J
TAB K
TAB L
TAB M
TAB N
TAB 0
TAB P
TAB Q
TAB � R
TAB S
�
INDEX - Continued
Health and Medical Service
Supplies
Transportation .
0
� �
TAB T
TAB U
TAB V