11/09/1981 - 5307OFFICIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 9, 1981
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING -
PLEASE S`IGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: fJov�ember 9, 1981
NAME
�___________________________________
ADDRESS
`S�D/-
ITEM NUMBER
� � _�-�--___= �
, . S�'l ,
.
FRIDLEY CITY �COUNC I L
�1 I
1 REGULAR MEETI,�G - NO`�EM�ER 9 198� - 7,
MEMO T0: DEPARTMENT HEADS�
FOLLOWING ARE THE `�ACTI�iJS NEEDED"� PLEASE HAVE YOUR ANSWERS
BACK IN THE CITY P�ANAGER�S OFFICE BY THE WEDNESDAY BEFORE THE
; NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING� THANK YOU���_ ��r ����>
PUBLIC iiEARING, �CTOBER I9, 1981 .
Approved
�CENTRAL 5ERV.
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER Z6, 1951
Approved � �
ADOPTIO�J OF AGENDA:
Add: Report from staff on Rezoning for Mr. Burandt
OPET� FORUM, VI�ITORS: . .
• tCONSIDERATION OF ITEMS.NOT ON AGENDA —�S ��1NUTES)
No Response
STATEMEi�T OF CA�IVASS :
CANVASSING OF VOTES OF THE GENERAL ELECTION OF
i�OVEMBER 3, 1981 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1 E
Approved �
ACTION NEEDED: File for future reference
PLiBLIC HEARI�IG:
PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PROJECT FOR ISSUANCE . .
OF $I,OOO,O�O�INDUSTRIAL �EVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS
TO �A MAUR, INC� UNDER THE P�1NNESOTA i�UNICIPAL
INDUS7RIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, P�1NNESO7A STATUTE5,
• CHAPTER 4�4 � � � � � � . � � � . � � � � � � � � � � . � 2
Hearing opened at 1:40 P.M. Closed at 7:45 P.M. �
ENTRAL SERV. SEE ITEM N0. 9- RESOLUTION N0. 126-1981
�
�
REGULAR �iEETIIVG, "�OVEMBER 9, 1981 PAGE
�
PUBLIC WORKS
CITY MANAGER
OLD BUS I i�ESS : r
CONSIDERATION OF PEVISED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR
SUBMITTAL TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
�TABLED 10/26I81) , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 3
Approved with changes
ACTION NEEDED: Make char�ges as directed and forward to Metro Council
CONSIDERATION OF SECOfJD READING OF AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING CHAPTER COZ UF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE
ENTITLED ���EER LICENSENG"� . . � � � . � � � � . � � , 4 - 4 E
Ordinance No. 743 adopted
ACTION NEEDED: Publish ordinance in Fridley Sun on Wednesday, November 18, 198
CONSIDERATION QF REZOPJING REQUEST ZOA #80-02, TED BllRANDT
Item tabled for two weeks for full report of the situation and alternatives
LIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: prepare ii�formation for City Council and put on agenda of
November 23, 1981
CENTRAL SERV.
�lEk� BUS I �JESS :
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST BY FRIDLEY FIREFIGHTERS
RELIEF ASSOCIATION TO UPGRADE THEIR PENSION BENEFITS
AND
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVI�CE REVENUE RULING 81-5II. ..�.. 5- 5 P
Request to upgrade pension benefits approved by Council
RESOLUTION N0. 125-1981 adopted
ACTION NEEDED: P�ake necessary changes to reflect upgraded benefits
and forward Resolution to appropriate parties for their information
�i
PUBLIC WORKS
�PUBLIC WORKS
�JEW BUSI���ESS �CONTINUED)
CONSIDERATION OF REAPPROVAL OF BROTTLUND ESTATES
PROPERTY, 6431 atvD 64:33 EasT RIVER ROAD,
REQUESTED BY ,J� A� CAI�WALLADER III, �BA�REALTY
WoRt�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,6-6D
Approved with 10 fooi easement and $600 park fee
ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council approval with stipulations
CONSIDERATION OF SIGN:[NG .JOINT COOPERATION
AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA l,OUNTY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOC K GRANT FOR I9gZ , � � � � � � � � � � � . � . � � � 7 - 7 G
Approved
ACTION NEEDED: Have agreement executed and forwarded
CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER y0� 1, WATER AND
SEWER PROJECT �Jo, 134� � � � � � . � . � � � � � � � � �S — � B
Approved
BLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Have Change Order executed
CONSIDERATION OF A RES�OLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO A PROPOSE�i INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
BY LA ��AUR, INC� UNDER THE �IUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOP�'MENT ACT AND AUiTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN
APPLICATION TO THE COMIMISSIONER OF SECURIiIES FOR
APPROVAL THEREOF. . � � , � � � � . � � , . . � . . � . 9 ' 9 A
RESOLUTION No. 126-1981 adopted with Change of $3,000,000 to $1,000,000
and change of Piper, Ja�ffry, Hopewood to Midland National Bank
ACTION NEEDED: Change resolution as directed and notify petitioner of Council
action.
�
PUBLIC WORKS
CE�JTRAL SERV.
ICITY MANAGER
�IEW BUSINESS (CONTINUE:D)
CONSIDERATION OF A RE:�OLUTION TO ACCEPT BIKEWAYI
WALKWAY EASEMENT FROM MARGIUETTE STATE BANK OF
COLUMB IA HE I GHTS � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
RESOLUTION No. 127-•1981 adopted
ACTION NEEDED: Have easement executed
CONSIDERATION OF A RE�>OLUTION AUTHORIZING
TRANSFERS FROM THE PUESLIC UTILITY FUND AND THE
REVOLVING FUND TO W-����"iATER WORKS IMPROVEMENT
BOND FUND AND WATER RE:FUNDING BONDS OF 1975 FuNn�
RESOLUTION No. 128-1981 adopted
ACTION NEEDED: Make nece�ssary entries to transfer funds
, , , 10 - 10 C
,,,11-11A
CONSIDERATION OF I9oZ HOLIDAY AND CITY COUNCIL
P`�EETING $CHEDULES � . � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � . � IZ
Schedules approved
ACTION NEEDED: Inform err�ployees of holiday schedule and put new
council meeting dates on newsletters
� APPOINTMENTS - CITY EMPLOYEES� � � � � � � � � . � � � 1�
Approved appointment of David Prois, Police Officer.
John Cich had withdrawn his name for consideration
CITY MANAGER ACTION NEEDED: Inform accounting of new employee
CENTRAL SERV
:ENTRAL SERV.
NTRAL SERV.
�J FRIaLEY CITY �COUNC I L
�
REGULAR Mf=ETI;�G -�IOVE�9BER 9, 19�1 - 7:3a P, M,
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA�JCE:
APPROVAL. OF MItJUTES :
PUBLIC HEARING, �)CTOBER 19, 1981
REGULAR �EETING, �)CTOBER 26, 19�1
ADOPTIOPJ OF AGE�JDA:
OPECa FORUM, VISITORS:
• �CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS,NOT ON AGENDA - �5 ��1NUTES).
STAT�MEi�T OF CA�IVASS :
CANVASSING OF VOTES OF' THE GENERAL ELECTION OF
I�OVEMBER 3, 1981, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 - 1 E
PdBLIC HEARING: �
PUBLIC HEARING ON PROP'OSED PROJECT FOR ISSUANCE .
OF $I,OOO,O�O INDUSTRIAL �EVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS
TO LA �IAUR, INC� UNDER THE ��1NNESOTA MUNICIPAL -
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT� ��1NNESOTA STATUTES, �
�HAPTER 474 � � � . � � . � � � � � � � � � � � � �� � . � 2
i�EW BUSINESS �CONTINUED)
CONSIDERATION OF REAPPROVAL OF BROTTLUND ESTATES
PROPERTY, 6431 aNn 6433 EasT RIVER ROAD,
REQUESTED BY �� A� CADWALLADER III, DBA�REALTY
WoR�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,6-6D
CONSIDERATION OF SIGNING �OINT COOPERATION
AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA COUNTY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOC K �RANT FOR 1982 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � % - 7 G
CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER iVO� 1, WATER AND
SEWER PROJECT ��o, 134, , . , � � � � � � � � � � � � � � - $ B
CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
BY LA �IAUR, INC� UNDER THE �iUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL -
DEVELOPMENT ACT AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN�
APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR
APPROVAL THEREOF. . � � � � � . � . � . � � � � � � � � 9 - 9 A
�
THE MI�dUTfS OF THE PUBLIC NEARING MEETING QF THE �RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
OCTOBER 19, 1981
__ . _ _ . _ _ .._ _. .
266
�'�'E 1
THE MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARII4G MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
OCTOBER 19, 1981
The Public Hearing Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:35 p. m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Barnette, Councilman Schneider,
Councilwoman Moses-Martin, and Councilman Fitzpatrick
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider i:o adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by
Councilwoman Moses-Martin. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
Mr. Vern Moen presented a check for $19,000 to the City, on behalf of the
Springbrook Nature Foundation. He stated the City had helped them finance
additional space and made it pos:sible to use a solar heat saving roof when
the nature center was constructead. He explained this would save them money
in the future and will be a goocf investment.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin statecf this is a good showing that the public
can get behind and donate money to a worthwhile cause and hoped this was the
beginning of a wonderful facilil:y.
Mayor Nee and the Council member•s extended their thanks to Mr. Moen for the
presentation of the check.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
TO REZONE FROM M-2
rHr,_ ��n _ ��Rn av
MOTION by Councilman Barnette ta waive the reading of the public hearing notice
and open the public hearing. Se�conded by Councilwoman Moses-Martin. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motian carried ur►anisnously
and the public hearing opened at 7:40 p. m.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director•, stated the property requested to be rezoned
is the area east of University z�nd south of 73rd Avenue. He stated this
triangular corner property is c�rrently zoned M-2 and the request is to rezone
to C-2 to allow construction of a corrmercial office building.
F1r. flora stated, at this time, Mr. Haggerty didn't wish to disclose who the
tenant would be for this building, but had a proposal from a bank for occupancy
as well as his law firm.
Mr. Flora stated staff has no pr•oblem with the rez oning, however, there was
discussion at the Planning Commission regarding the entrances and exits, and _.
� one-way traffic scheme was proposed. He pointed out the intersection at
University and 73rd is scheduled to he improved and there will be additional
turning lanes into this area.
0
n^��
:.J �.' 1
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1981 PAGE 2
Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission recanmended approval of the rezoning,
with the stipulation that the rezoning not be approved until the building
permit is taken out for construction of this office building, and that the
traffic fla�u be worked out as per Mr. Haggerty's building plan, with the northerly
driveway to be an entrance only and the southerly driveway to be an exit only.
He stated, if this was not possible, then the Planning Cortmission recormiended
that staff's proposal should be worked out.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin stated she was not so concerned with the frontage
road, but if there would be stacking room for cars at the stoplight on University
and 73rd.
Mr. Flora stated it shouldn't be a problem because they have about 200 feet of
stacking room for vehicles.
Mr.:Haggerty stated fhe biggest problem when you have a banking institution is
the tremendous amount of space taken for the drive-in facility. He felt if
they could have another exit on the south, they could live with it; however,
he would prefer it would be a drive both for ingress and egress.
Mr. Haggerty stated he felt they would have to stay with a two-story building in
order to meet the parking requirements.
Mr. Mike Larson, 6390 Starlite Blvd., asked what would be the costi of
construction of this building. Mr. Haggerty stated it be about $1,600,000.
Mr. Larson questioned if it would be financed through a conventiona7 mortgage.
Mr. Haggerty stated he is looking at a tax exempt mortgage and would come
back to the City to request financing under the industrial revenue bond
statute.
Mr. Larson felt the financing should be decided at the time the rezoning is
� discussed.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the question whether financing through
industrial revenue bonds would be available would not change if the rezoning
was left as it is now or changed to commercial.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this rezoning request.
MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to close the public hearing. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote,all�ioting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motioncarried unanimously and the public hearing closed at
7:55 p. m.
cL PUBLIC HEARIN6 ON VACATION REQUEST, SAV #81-03 BY PETITION N0. 9-1981 TO
VACATE 66TH AVENUE BETWEEN PIERCE STREET AND LUCIA LANE, BURTON H. SCHER1iEN:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing
notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses-Martin.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unan�mously a�d the pub]ic hearing opened at 7:56 p. m.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the area in question is just east
of Highway 65 and north of Mississippi Street. He stated the City has a
right-of-way for 66th Avenue which would connect Pierce to Lucia Lane, but '
it has not been constructed.
� Mr. Flord stated Mr. Scherven came in for a variance �rr order to construct a
house and garage on his property, and also requested vacation of the easement.
� n .^p
l�vc7
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1981 PAGE 3
Mr. Flora stated it was found th,at the utility canpanies require retainment
of a 10 foot easement and the City requires an easement for drainage. He
stated the Planning Comnission h,as recorrrnended approval of the vacation, with
the stipulation that utility and drainage easements be retained.
Mr.S�veren stated all the neighbors have signed for the vacation and stated
they want to use this area for a garden. Mr. Schveren stated if a street
were to go through, he would hav�e to sell his house as tHe garage encumbers on
the easement.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the staff's position is, essentially, they
are against vacating any roadways; because, in the past, the City had to go
back and acquire right-of-way th��t had been vacated. He pointed out there are
sizable lots in this area and des�ending on any future development to the north,
it would dictate whether or not t:his road would be constructed.
It was pointed out Mr, Schveren c:ould proceed with his construction plans,
as he has obtained the variance, regardless of what action is taken on the
vacation request,
��o other person in the audience spoke regarding this request for vacation.
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to close the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Ilpon a voice vote, all voting aye, �•tayor Nee declared
the motion carried u�an5mously•a�dthe public hearing closed at 8:10 p. m.
��PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PROJECT FOR.ISSUANCE OF $1,975,000 INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMFNT RFVFNIIF Rf1Nf1S T(1 FFNI TNf_ �FHI Ttir. Cmn ruvrtn iitinra Tur Mrutircnre
MOTION by Councitman Schneider to waive the reading of the,�public hearing
��otice and open the public hearinq. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously
and the public hearing opened at 8:10 p. m.
Mr. Inman, �City Clerk, stated this is a request for the issuance of $1,975,000
in industrial revenue bonds for construction of a three-story office building
located on the property at 921 and 941 Hillwind Road. He stated part of the
property is in a tax increment district and there are plans to remove an
existing structure for constructi��n of this new office building.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the area in question is east of
Highway 65 and north of I-694 and involves two parcels being developed into
commercial property,
Councilman Schneider stated he didn't have any reservations on using this
type of financing, since it is be�ing done for office buildings, and other
cities are using this means in orcier to remain cornpetitive for a tax base.
Councilman Schneider stated he dici have a concern on the height and size
of the building.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated this is the maximum height which can be
built, however, he stated they do meet all the zoning requirements.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin stated she had a concern about the traffic funneling
into the adjacent neighborhood.
Councilman Barnette stated his concern would be the neighborhood reaction to
this commercial building in their area.
Mayor Nee stated the question of the rezoning is now being considered to
rezone this property from R-3 to GR-1. He stated a public hearing was
previously held, but action was ta.bled on the rezoning request, therefore,
residents were sent out a notice that this question would again'"be before the
Council this evening.
�1�j�
PUBLIC HEARIN6 MEETIN6 OF OCT08ER 19, 1981 PAGE 4
Mayor Nee stated another question, if the rezoning is approved, is whether
industrial revenue bonds should be used for construction of the office
building.
Mr. Richard Nordlund, Investment Banker - First Corporate Services, appeared
before the Council regarding the question of industrial revenue bonds to
finance the construction of this office building.
Mr. Nordlund stated he felt this would be a good project and addition to
the City and would increase the tax base, and anticipated construction costs
somewhere between $1,500,000 to $1,700,000. He stated they would have about
40 tenants, with an average salary of $15,000 a year,
Mr. Nordlund stated the interest rates for a conventional mortgage are
between 16-1/4% to 17-1/4% and feTt the interest rate for a tax exempt mortgage
would be about 13%. He stated it would be feasible to proceed with construction
at an interest rate of 13X, but not at rates 16-1/4% to 17-1/4%.
Mr. Nordlund stated he doesn't handle the leasing for the building, but was
told by Ms. Nybo that they had a number of inquiries and a number of persons
interested in moving into this building.
Mr. Nordlund stated they will go out and find a lender and obtain a letter of
comnittal for the mortgage. He stated instead of selling bonds, only one
financial institution would be involved and the developer would have to put in
part of the cost.
Councilman Schneider questioned the amount the developer would have to pay
in order to obtain a mortgage. Mr. Nordlund stated it would be a substantial
amount, probably 10% or more.
Mr. Mike Larson, 6390 Starlite Blvd., questioned the length of the mortgage,
and Mr. Nordlund stated it would be 20 to 25 years.
Mr, Larson stated the difference in interest between a conventional mortgage
�nd a tax exempt mortgage is about 5% and on this basis, for a 20 year
mortgage, the savings in interest would be about $1,733,520. He pointed out
that this is interest savings to the business of roughly 88% of the original
maximum mortgage, which is substantial.
Mr. Larson felt industrial revenue bonds have their place when you are talking
about adding jobs, however, this facility would not create the jobs a manufac-
turing expansion would generate.
Mr. Larson stated in 1971 in Minnesota, financing through industrial revenue
bonds was $17,000,000 and that figure has risen to $641,000,000 in 1979.
Mr. Larson stated the Reagan administration is looking at doing away with�
industrial revenue bonds, basically, because of the revenue loss. He stated
it is a problem that is really starting to hurt and if everything is being
financed with industrial revenue bonds, the deficit would be much 7arger.
Mr. Larson stated hearings on industrial revenue bonds are being held on
the State level and steps being taken t� prohibit their flagrant use.
Mr, Larson feit this type of financinq, in the long run, is really detrimental
to the tax payer. He pointed out, with the tremendous supply of industrial
revenue bonds, the interest costs to the City for genera7 obligation bonds for
� improvements will be 2 to 2-1/2% higher.
Mr. Larson stated he could more easiiy support industrial revenue bonds for
the expansion of large businesses, instead of something of this nature.
2iU
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING Of OCTOBER 19, 1981 PA6E 5
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated th�� City did deny industrial revenue
bond financing in the past, however, the issues Mr. Larson raises are good.
He felt it is a policy matter that should be considered at the Federal and
State levels, and if this means of financing is:stopped, all cities are going
to be treated equa]7y. He stated th�e problem they have if they want ar�y
development now, this is probably the only method left to finance any industrial
or commerciai construction. He stated the thrust has been to help existing
industries in Fridley, however, more and more cor�nunities are using this means
to obtain industry and the City has to remain competitive.
Mr. Larson stated he is concerned about the fact that this project is do or
die depending on whether they approve industrial revenue financing. He felt
just because everyone else was using this means, the City didn't have to stay
in there to get their share and that this had to be looked at from the taxpayer's
viewpoint.
Mr. Qureshi pointed out he was also a taxpayer and felt this should be brought
to the attention of their representatives in Congress as some of the arguments
made were good.
Mayor Nee stated he would like to have this process eliminated by the federal
government. He stated he felt the Council was uneasy with using this means of
financing, but it comes down to the question if they don't offer this means and
other cities do, they have lost some development. He stated it then gets into
the question of regretable alternatives. He felt there are better ways to help
along development, however, it is the setting today and what they have to dea]
with.
Playor Nee stated he would agree it is bad, but puts the City rn a position
where, if they want to remain compet.itive, they are almost required to do it.
Councilman Barnette stated the idealistic situation is not to have this means
of financing, however, if they don't: provide this tool, developers would go
somevrhere else and the Council would then have denied Fridley this deve]opment.
Mr. Larson stated he didn't think Fr•idley got where it is today with tfle
issuance of industria) revenue bonds and his hunch is, in the next year, the
conversation will be meaningless bec:ause something will be done.
Councilman Schneider asked if it was: fair to the local taxpayers to not
take advantage of something that is legal and, from the City's viewpoint,
risk-free. He stated all the s�rrounding corrmunities are, in fact, providing
this means of financing so whether i:hey issue industrial revenue bonds here or
whether they are issued in a neighbc�ring community, it is the same cost on the
State and Federal levels.�
Mr. Larson stated the taxpayer can'�t attribute the cost to his pocketbook. He
pointed out it is the same with grai�ts. The money is taken from one pocket and
put into another, however, it is st�ill the taxpayer who is paying.
Mr, Larson stated the Council agree�s with all the facts, but because you want
to have a new building, you will pr��bably approve it anyway.
Mayor Nee stated he would sign a letter with Mr. Larson to send to the Congress
to repeai the use of industrial revenue financing, but until this is done, he
has another problem.
Mr, Nordlund stated the State Comnissioner of Taxation testified at hearings
in the State of Minnesota that industrial revenue bonds had no significant
effect, as far as the State revenue was concerned.
.Mr. Nordlund stated Minnesota issues quite a few industrial revenue bonds,
however, the Northern states are losing businesses to the Southern areas.
�)'j �
L. � 1
PUBLIC HEARING OF OCTOBER 19, 1981 PAGE 6
Mr. Nordlund felt anything a city can do to increase its tax base helps in
selling bonds. •
Mr. Moen, 7154 Riverview Terrace, stated he felt, in the beginning, industrial
revenue bonds were intended for construction of hospitals and institutions and
tends to agree with Mr, Larson's cortments that it would be overstepping the
bounds in issuing tax free revenue bonds in this case, as there is no doubt it
does remove revenues from the State and Federal goverrments.
Mr. Dave Harris,470 Rice Creek boulevard, stated he is involved in a residential
housing project in Coon Rapids and the housing industry is the lowest since the
1950's. Mr. Harris stated he had nine builders in this project and is now down
to two builders, and many of the workers had to go on unemployment and welfare.
He felt this was a bigger tax bite compared to the loss uf income the State does
not get from the issuance of industrial revenue bonds.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed project for
the issuance of industrial revenue bonds.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:15 p, m.
OLD BUSINESS:
� CONSIDERATION OF REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #80-02 TO REZONE FROM R-3 TO CR-
Mayor Nee stated the Council has had the hearing on this rezoning request
and.tabled the decision on the rezoning. He stated neighboring residents have
been notified that the Council will be considering the item this evening.
� Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the request is to re2one the
° property from R-3 to CR-1. He stated when the public hearing was held on the
3 rezoning request, several stipulations were recommended, one being that the
� existing structure was to be removed and another was to provide screening.
He stated, at the time af the hearing, Mr, Burandt was developing a package,
but was not too interested in tearing down the existing structure, He stated,
since this time, parties have gotten together with the plan for construction
of an office building.
Councilman Schneider stated he believed it makes sense for commercial use of
the property. He stated the traffic question that has cume up before is a
real problem, however, he is not convinced it would make a lot of difference
in the traffic, whether the property is used for multipies or comnercial
development.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin stated she couldn't believe the neighboring residents
weren't present this evening, as they raised many questions at the time �f the
public hearing.
Councilman Schneider stated he has talked with Carol Fassett several times and,
generally, it was her feeling, and she wasn't speaking for her neighbors, that
she would prefer corrmercial development rather than more multiple units.
Mr, Qureshi, City Manager, stated a�cess to the office building would be
essentially through Hillwind Road, with traffic exiting to Hackman through
� Polk Street.
No persons in the audience spoke for or against this proposed rezoning request,
and the following item was cons�dered.
L%�
PUBLIC HEARING OF OCTOBER 19, 1981 PAGE 7
CUI�'SIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF TIIE
TO CR-1:
MOTION by Counclilman Schneider to waive the reading of the above ordinance
and approye the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Barnette.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Ma;yor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
5 ORDINANCE N0. 741 REPEALING CHAPTER 51)6 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CObE IN ITS
ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 51)6 ENTITLED "VEHICLE PARKING":
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of Ordinance Plo. 714
and adopt it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by
Councilwoman Moses-Martin. Upon a vo�ice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimous'ly.
NEW BUSINESS:
.� �CONSIDERATION OF A SIGN PERMIT APPLICI�TION, UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, 666
MISSISSIPPI STREET:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the United Methodist Church has
requested a second free standing sign identifying their day care center to be
placed on P9onroe Street off of Missis:sippi.
Mr. Flora stated United Methodist Chui-ch came to the Council in 1980 for some
variances and the Council required somE� screening, a landscape plan, and
deferred the requirement for curbing in the parking lot until 1983. He stated
they have been assured the improvement:s would be completed as requested by the
Council last year.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant the sign permit to United Methodist
Church for a s�c9nd free standing sign identifying their day care center.
Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanirnously.
��.� �RESOLUTION N0, 119-1981 APPLYING FOR A STAT
MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Ftartin to adopt Resolution PJo. 119-1981. Seconded
by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimous'ly.
� RESOLUTION_N0,_120_1981 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON FINANCING INDUSTRIAL
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to a�iopt Resolution No. 120-1981 setting the
public hearing for November 9, 1981. Secanded by Councilwoman Moses-Martin.
:�r.Wallace Johnson, Vice-President of Finance for LaMaur, Inc., stated their
company has been in Fridley since 19711 a�d they manufacture hair care products.
He stated they employed 370 persons in 1970 and presently employ �00 and
that their sales have increased from '�20,000,000 in 1970 to $65,000,000.
Mr. Johnson stated there is a need to expand their facilities and they are
in the preliminary stages of identifying the type of expansion needed,
and the cosf will be about $3,000,001). He stated they have elected to
come to the Council and ask for finanr.ing through industrial revenue bonds.
They were advised the public hearing ��n their request will be on November 9, 1981.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE t�07I0N, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimous'ly.
. • �; . .
!+J
1�
11
2���
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1981 PAGE 8
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION RECITING A PROPIaAL FOR A COMMERCIAL FACILIT
PAL
Councilman Schneider stated he would feel more comfortable having the developers
here to discuss their plans. He stated he didn't have a problem regarding the
financing, but concern on the traffic flow.
Since Ms. Nybo was on vacation, it was felt it probably would be better to
wait another week before action is taken on this resolution so the Council
could discuss any concerns they had with her.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table action on this resolution for one week
�ntil one of the principals is. present. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses-Martin.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
CLAIMS:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize payment of Claims No. 266530
through 299W26. Seconded by Councilman Schneider, Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
LICENSES:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on
file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
� 2 ESTIMATES:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted.
Herrick & Newman, P.A.
6279 University Avenue N.E.
fridley, MN 55432
For legal services rendered as City Attorney
for the month of September, 1981
Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon & Halvitz
1250 Builders Exchange Building
Minneapolis, NQJ 55402
For legal services rendered as City Prosecutor
for the month of September, 1981
TKDA, Inc.
2500 American National Bank Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
Infiltration/Inflow Analysis for August, 1981
Walhunt Construction Company
1640 - 177th Avenue N.W.
Cedar, MN 55011
FINAL Est. #3 - S& W Project No. 133
�
$1,855.85
$3.787.50
$6,069.83
$4,343.01
274
PUBLIC HEARING OF OCTOBER 19, 19$1 PAGE 9
Estimates Continued:
E.A. Hickok and Associates Inc.
545 Indian Mound
Wayzata, MN 55391
Professional Services - Moore Lake
Restoration Project (September, 1981) $3,598.50
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousty,
1� PROPOSAL ON APARTMENT COMPLEX - D�4VE HARRIS; 470 Rice Creek Blvd.:
Mr. David Harris appeared before the Council regarding a proposal for an
apartment complex at 83rd and Uni�rersity.
Mr. Harris stated he and Mr. Schroer had soil samples taken in the area
and because of the peat, it is not: feasilbe to develop this property as
industrial, and wi11 be submittinq a request for rezoning for multiple use.
Mr. Harris stated he would like reaction from the Council if this use would
be compatible with the City's plar� for development in this area.
Mr. Harris stated there would be a series of internal roads into the
360 unit apartment complex, using 83rd Avenue as the main ingress and
egress. He stated he is looking to proceed with this project using an
industrial revenue bond and would ask the Council to participate in some
corrective action on the soil to allow this development to take place.
P1r. Harris estimated the cost of the project to be $11,000,000.
Mr. Harris stated it is planned that 20% of the units will be reserved for
low and moderate income housing ami feels it is the basis to create a tax
increment district.
It was the general concensus of thE� Council that this use would be consistent
with the City's plan for tfiis area,.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to acljourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider, Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the Public
Hearing Meeting of the Fridley City Council of October 19, 1�81 adjourned at
10:16 p. m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secy. to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETI��G OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
OCTOBER 26, 1981
`. . v
THE MINUTES OF THE RE6ULAR MEETIN6 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
OCTOBER 26. 1981
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at
7:35 p. m, by Mayor Nee.
PLED6E OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Eouncil and audi•ence in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilman Fitzpatrick,Councilwoman Moses-Martin,
Mayor Nee,�Councilman Schneider and Councilman Barnette
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
REGULAR MEETING, OCTOBER 5, 1'981:
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to a�aprnve the minutes as presented. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a v�oice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
decTared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Mayor Nee requested the foliowing items be added to the agenda: (1) Set a
Public Hear•ing on the Issuance of Industrial Revenue Bonds on Behalf of the
73rd Avenue Partnership Project; (2) Set a Public Hearing on Behalf of the
Rice Creek Company; and (3) Set a Public Hearing on the Establishment of a
_ Tax Increment District in the North Area.
� MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to adopt the agenda with the above additions.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
There was no response from the audience under this item of bus9Ress.
OLD BUSINESS•
�� ��RESO�UTION N0. 121-1981 RECITING A PROPOSA� FOR A COMMERCIAL FACIlITIES
DEVELOPP4ENT PROJECT. GIVIN6 PRELIMINARY APPR(1VAI �F THF PR(1,1FCT PIIRCIIAN
Y DOCUMENTS
Mayor Nee stated action was tabled on this reso]ution at the 7ast meeting
in order to receive further comnents from the proposed developer.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the proposal is to construct a 28,000
square foot office building on the northeast corner of I-694 and Highway 65.
He stated this building will be constructed on two lots, one lot presently
contains an old, burned out structure which is not occupied, and the other
lot south of it currently has a model home which was converted to office space.
Mr. Qureshi stated the proposal is to remove both of the structures and
construct the office building.
Councilman Schneider stated Ms. Nybo is on vacation, however, he did receive
a phone call from her and he is comfortable as far as proceeding on this
resolution.
Councilman Schneider stated regarding the next item on the agenda, which is
the rezoning issue, it is his intent to move to authorize the administration
to enter into an agreement with the petitioner and, upon completion of the
items outlined in this agreement, there would be a seca�d reading on the
rezoning ordinance.
`Lifi
RE6ULAR MEETIN6 OF OCTOBER 26, 1981 PAGE 2
Councilman Schneider asked if they approved the resolution for the industrial
revenue bond financing, if it would affect the control on the rezoning.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated approval for industrial revenue bond
financing, at this time, is preliminary approval and doesn't bind the Council
to proceed.
He stated it should be pointed out the Council would be giving preliminary
approval and one of the conditions of final approval would be to obtain the
rezoning.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 121-1981. Seconded
by Councilwoman Moses-Martin.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin asked Councilman Schneider what he had discussed
with Ms. Nybo in their telephone conversation.
Councilman Schneider stated he talked with her about the structure and made
sure they intended to remove the existing structures, however, he stated they
didn't go into detail on the building construction.
UPON A VOICE VOTE. TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
2 CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF
Councilman Schneider felt the City shouid maintain some control to make
sure existing structures on the property are removed.
Councilman Schneider stated he felt administration should be authorized
to enter into an agreement with the petitioner regarding certain assurances
that the office building will be built before there is a second reading on
the rezoning ordinance.
Mr. Burandt, petitioner for the rezoning, stated the developers are not
involved in the rezoning on this particular piece of property.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the agreement, referred to by Councilman
Schneider, would be between the developer and the City to remove the old,
burned-out structure as well as the existing house that is being used as
an of4ice in order to construct a new office building. He further stated,
if these conditions are met in a certain amount of time, the City will
rezone this property.
Mr. Burandt stated in order for the new office building to be constructed,
it would be necessary to remove both structures in order to supply adequate
parking. �
Mr. Burandt stated he needed this property rezoned now in order to sell it
to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority so they, in turn, can sell it
to the developer.
Councilman Schneider stated he didn't want this property in question rezoned
unless they have a package whereby the burned-out house and the house occupied
by Swing Realty are removed.
Mk�. Burandt stated the Council has then changed their position, because at
the time of the hearing, the position taken was Anly to remove the burned-out
structure.
IND
�
?7 %
REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 26, 198:, PAGE 3
Councilman Schneider stated he has talked to neighboring residents, since
the time of the hearing, and doesn't want to be in the position of having
the property rezoned and not have adequate parking.
Councilwoman Moses-Martin stated if this proposed project for construction
of an office building falls through and the property is rezoned to CR-1,
someone could build a smaller structure and never have to come to the Council
for approval, if they met all the codes.
Councilman Schneider stated, even if the rezoning is tied to the removal of
both structures, he didn't believe it would effect Mr. Burandt's dealings
with the Housing and Redevelopment .Authority.
Mr. Qureshi felt it would have no effect, if the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority was going to acquire this piece of property.
Mr. Burandt stated the Housing and 12edevelopment Authority is only acquiring
one piece of property, the one for which he is asking for the rezoning.
Mr. Boardman, City Ptanner, stated 1;he problem is that only one piece of property is
in the tax increment district and i•F the funding doesn't go through for
construction of this office building, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
will pull out of the project.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated i�t would seem if the proposal for the
Nybo office building goes through, t:hen it makes no difference on the
rezoning issue. If it doesn't go tFirough, and the rezoning is approved,
tl�� owner cauld ._ make application for any office building that would
meet the area requirements of that particul.�r lot. He felt the question
to be answered was if the Council would prefer to have the property rezoned
even if it is a separate lot and there may be the possibility of a smaller
office building, or to have it remain at its present zoning until they know
definitely what wi11 happen with the proposed project.
Mayor Nee felt if Mr. Burandt contrcls both parcels, it would seem to be
in his best interests to make an agr�eement with the developer.
Mr. Burandt stated he doesn't control Nybo's property per se, but has a
contract for deed which states nothing can be removed from the property,
without payment on the contract for deed.
Mayor Nee asked which parcel of property the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority is considering for purchase. Mr. Boardman, City Planner, stated
it is the parcel where the existing burned-out structure is located and that
Nybo's control the other parcel under a contract for deed.
Mr. Her_r.ick felt the agreement could be wii� the developer for the office
building to the effect that if the building project goes forward, the lot
with the burned-out house would be rezoned and Nybo's would agree that both
this structure and the other structure housing Farmers Insurance would be
removed. He stated, at that point, �they would have to pay Mr. Burandt on
the contract for deed. Mr. Herrick :stated he didn't see such an agreement
as being an obstacle and felt they could go to their financial agency with
such an agreement for the necessary financing.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to di!rect the administration to work out an
agreement which insures that before �the property is rezoned, there are
assurances that the office building proposed to be constructed will, in fact,
be built and implies the removal of �the Farmers Insurance Building and removal
of the burned-out structure; further., that the agreement insures the proper
plantings, screening, signing and th�it the new construction is substantially
the same as proposed to the Council. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses�Martin.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, �layor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimouslv,
L'i �
RE6ULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 26, 1981 PAGE 4
Mr. Nordlund, representing the developer, stated normally you have an
inducement resolution to induce the developer to go out and get plans
and try to obta�r�: mortgage commitment from lending institution. He
stated, with the mortgage comnitment, they will be able to do a11 the
things required by the Council.
He stated once they get the comnitment for financing, if the rezoning
could be a timely and quick step, he could see no problems of having
such an agreement.
No action, therefore, was taken at this time on the second reading of
the ordinance covering the rezoning.
NEW BUSINESS•
3 CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE^TO,AMEND THE_CITY
!1F TlJ[ f TTV !1C CbTro rv ��rni��rcnTn nv ..e�.r.�.. . .
i�10TIaY by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to waive the reading and approve the
ordinance upon first reading, Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee dec1A red the motion carried unanimously.
[� CONSIDERATIO�V OF FIRS7 READIN6 OF AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE STREE7S
/l�ln Tn 11\AI"\111 nnnrun•.. .. n� ��... ...�.., _..__ _".. .._' '_ ____
�5
Councilman Schneider stated he did go out and look at this property and
if a road were to be constructed at some future date, one garage would be
very close to the right-of-way. He felt this wasn't a significant enough
problem to proceed with the vacation and felt the City should retain the
easement in the event there may be a need for it in the future.
MOTIOP� by Councilman Schneider to deny vacation request, SAV #81-03, as
filed by Burton H. Scherven for th e vacation of 66th Avenue between Pierce
Street and Lucia Lane. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses-Martin. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Jim Hill, Public Safety Director, stated at the Council's regular meeting
on October 5, there was a request for a temporary on-sale beer license from
a local businessman and it was recommended the license be denied as they didn't
qualify for a license under the provisions of the State statute.
Mr. Hill stated the ordinance before the Cauncil for first reading would permit
a business to give away beer during a special event and would more clearly
define what the term sale, sell, or sold is intended to mean and is consistant
with the definition in the Minnesota State statute.
Mr. Hill stated the new Subdivision 5, Section 602.02, explicitly provides for
the exemption of the license while giving away free beer, but sti11 gives the
City control over the possibility of giving free beer away which would create
a public safety danger or infringe on the peace and tranquillity or violate
the laws. •
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he has no problem with the concept of the
ordinance and would suggest a first reading, however, he may have some minor
changes at the time of the second reading of the ordinance.
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to waive the reading and approve the ordinance
upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote,
all vo tin� aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
. ��
REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 26, 198:1 PA6E 5
6 ORDINANCE N0. 742 AN EMERGENCY ORDI:NANCE FOR THE CONTRACTING AND EXPENDITURE
OF FUNDS FOR THE REPAIR OF WELL #3 IN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
Mr. Mark Burch, Assistant Public Warks Director, stated Well No. 3 has been
a poor well for the City and never produced, however, in the process of
preparing the well for abandora����r�te�nd capping, it was determined that air
jetting the well could possibly remove all the loose material and allow
;;he well to function propei;.y.
� Mr. Burch stated sufficient quantit.ies of sand have been removed to realize
the development of the well hole and the company doing the air jetting stated
they have had some luck with this process.
Mr. Burch stated it is requested that an emergency ordinance be passed to
authorize the expenditure up to a maximum of $30,000 for further development
of the well, rather than try to construct a new well at a cost of about $300,000.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the first and second readings of
this ordinance and adopt it and order publication. Seconded by Councilman
Barnette, Upon a voice vote, all voting a�ye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
� RECEIVING CHARTER COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1981:
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to receive the minutes of the Charter Comnission
Meeting of September 1, 1981. Seconded by Cauncilwoman Moses-Martin. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee decl•ared the motion carried unanimously.
� RECEIVING CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8, 1981:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Cable Television
Commission Meeting of October 8, 1981. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses-Martin.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, IMayor Nee declared the motion carried
� unanimously.
Mr. Burch stated this Thursday evening , October 29, the Cable Television
Company will have their technical p�eople available to answer any questions
from the Council. He stated if any of the Council members cannot be present
they mdy submit their questions to �either him or Clyde Moravetz for presentation.
Mr. Burch also stated this Saturday morning, October 31, at 9:00 a.m., Mr. Herbst,
attorney for the Cable Commission, will be at the Anoka County Library to answer
any questions from the Council.
9 CONSIDERATION OF REVISED COMPREHEYS[VE PLAN FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE METROPOLITAN
COUNCIL:
+1r. Boardman, City Planner, stated •the Metropolitan Council has put the City's
Comprehensive Plan on hold which me�ins they are not reviewing it any more. He
stated the City has to clarify cert�jin areas, mainly, land use to show where
high and low densities would be loc�jted, and the parks and open space element.
Mr. Boardman stated another area wa�s transportation to clarify 1990 volumes
and the issue of sewer capacity. He stated staff had to re-evaluate the
residential and industrial growth ti� give the Metropolitan Council a more
realistic figure and this was done ��fter the census data was received.
Mr. Boardman stated staff is now ready to submit the new projections to the
s- Metropolitan Council.
,� Councilman Schneider felt on the land use they are right back to the problem
that had been originally discussed, where they are, by submission of the map
to the Metropolitan Council, rezoning property.
ao�
REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 26, 1981
PAGE 6
Mr. Boardman stated rezoning of any properties isn't marked, except those
in the redevelopment 4istricts. He stated those properties will be rezoned
by action of the Housing Redevelopment Authority, when adequate proposals
are submitted to the HRA.
Mr.Boardman stated, in the redevelopment section, it has been stated that
no rezoning will take place unless it goes through the action of the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority. He further stated any other rezoning has to
go to the Metropolitan Council for their review within a ten day period.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, asked if a piece of property is presently zoned
industrial, however, in the Comprehensive Plan, it is shown as residential,
but there has been no rezoning by the Council, and the owner wanted the
property for industrial development, what would happen.
Mr. Boardman stated, if it is according to the plan, that would be an
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and would have to be submitted to the
Metropolitan Council.
He stated if the Comprei�cnsive Plan shows it as residential and it is presently
industrial, and the owner requests a rezoning to residential, then this
wouldn't have to be submitted to Lhe Metropolitan Council, as it is consistant
with the Comprehensive Plan.
Councilman Schneider asked what the City's position would be then if the
Metropolitan Council tells them they can't approve a rezoning. Mr. Boardman
stated they would have to give them a reason as far as the metropolitan
significance. He stated what they probably would be looking for is how a
development would affect the transportation system and how much traffic
would be emptyin� on to a road system. He felt in 98% of the cases, the
Metropolitan Council probably woutdn't have any feedback, and probably
wouldn't say they couldn't rezone a property.
Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, felt the only thing the Metropolitan Council
would consider significant would be how a development affects the sewer
capacity, as Fridley has a good transportation system.
Councilman Schneider stated it seems to him, for all practical purpose, the
map to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council, rezones the City of Fridley,
and takes the control out of the Council's hands and puts it into the control
of the Metropolitan Council.
Mr. Boardman stated the only thing they are talking about rezoning is the
redevelopment district. He stated the Comprehensive Plan is, in fact, the
zoning for the City and if that zoning plan is art�nded, it has to be
submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review.
Mr. Boardman stated the only other alternative is not to show any zoning,
but densiaie� in the redevelopment districts. He stated these modifications
can be made in each of the redevelopment districts and try to sell this to
the Metropolitan Council.
Mdyor Nee felt this should be done if it isn't acceptable, perhaps the
Council should meet with the Metropolitan Council.
Councilman Schneider also felt it wasn't necessary to include the element
of the parks and open space.
Mr. Boardman stated this is required under the Land Planning Act.
Councilman Schneider suspected this is not a requirement in the legislation,
but a rule of the Metropolitan Council staff.
2�1
REGULAR MEETIN6 OF OCTOBER 26, :1981 PA6E 7
MOTION by Councilman FitzpatricM: to receive the revised Comprehensive
Plan and for staff to bring it t�ack to the Council in two weeks with the
revision of the map. Seconded t�y Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
1 � LICENSES:
MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to approve the licenses as submitted
and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seco�ded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimous�y
� � CLAIMS:
MOTION by OQUncilman Schneider to authorize p�yment of Claims No. 266602
through 298M73. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declar��d the motion carried unanimously,
1 2 ESTIMATES•
MOTION by Councilman Barnette to approve the estimates as submitted.
Halvorson Construction
4227 - 165th Avenue N.E.
Wyoming, MN 55092
Partial Est. #7 - Miscellaneous concrete
curb and slab construction $918.25
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
1 3 RESOLUTION N0. 122-1981 ESTABL_ISHING THE DATE FOR A PuBLIC HEaRrrir nN
ING
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 122-1981. Seconded
by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon �i voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
1 Q_ RESOLUTION N0. 123-1981 CALLING F()R A PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 123-1981, setting
the public hearing for November 23, 1981. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses-
Martin. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
1� RESOLUTION N0. 124-1981 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARIN6 ON A PROPOSAL TO
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to �adopt REsolution No. 124-1981, setting
a public hearing for November 23, 1981. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses-
Martin. Upon a voice vote, all vo�ting aye, M�y+.or �Jee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
1� CONSIDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC 4�EARING ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TAX
INCREMENT DISTRICT IN THE NORTH ARE:A:
MOTION by Councilwoman Moses-Martin to set the public hearing for November 23,
1981. Seconded by Councilman Barne�tte. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
282
REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 26, 1981 PAGE 8
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by
Councilwoman Moses-Martin. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting
of the Fridley City Council of October 26, 1981 adjourned at 9:05 p. m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carol Haddad Wi]]iam J. Nee
Secy, to the City Council Mayor
Approved;
0
�
STATEMEN7 OF CAN_VASS
GENERAL ELEC7ION
NOVEMBER 3, 1981
DECLARATION OF RESULTS THEREOF
In accordance with Section 4.08 of the Charter of the City of Fridley, the City
Council declares the results of the 19l31 General Election to be as follows:
A. The total number of ballots cas�t was:
Ward 1- Precinct 1 78
Ward 1- Precinct 2 233
Ward 1- Precinct 3 107
Ward 3- Precinct 1 445
Ward 3- Precinct 2 1�� ��
Ward 3- Precinct 3 31a '
TOTAL
1,342
1s342
B. The votes for each candidate, ar�d the number of overvotes, undervotes and
write-in votes are as follows:
COUNCIL.MEMBER - WARD I
W-1 P-1
Ed Namernik 73
Overvotes 0
Undervotes 2
Stan Kowalski 1
Cheryl Moses Martin 1
Write-in Votes Bruce Peterson 1
W-1 P-2
228
0
4
Kay
Neilson 1
W-1 P-3
100
0
3
Herb Egeness 3
Bill Weiss 1
TOTAL 78 233 107
TOTAL
401
0
9
0
418
1
PAGE 2
Ed Fitzpatrick
Irene Maertens
Overvotes
Undervotes
Write-in Votes
GENERAL EtECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 1981
COLINCILMEMBER - WARD III
W-3 F'-1 W-3 P-2 W-3 P-3
20� 49 227
229 115 86
1 0 0
5 1 1
Janice Dean 1
0 0
70TAt 445 165
C. The following officers were ��eclared elected:
COUNCILMEMBER WARQ I- ED HAMERNIK
COUNCILMEMBER WARD III - f:D FITZPATRICK
0
314
° TOTAL
485
430
1
7
1
924
lA �
PAGE 3
1P
GENERAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 1981
D. The following is a true copy of the baliot used for Councilmember Ward I:
; _ --
. • • �
� ��'�ItICi� �C���Ot
; CfTY 0� fRlDLET
Anoka County, Minnesota
General Election
TU�SDAY, NOYEMBER 3,1981
� Put an ( X) opposite the name of each candidate you wish to
vote for, in the square indicated by the arrow.
COU:YCILMEMBER- WARDI
(VOTE FOR ONE)
ED HA�JIERNtK
PAGE 4
GENERAI ELECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 1981
E. The following is a true copy of the ballot used for Councilmember Ward III:
�_=
.:
f
F.
�
� '��i1�lq� ����Ot
� CfTY OF FRIDLEY
, Anoka County, Minnesota
� General Election
- TUESDAY, NOVEI��ER 3,1981
� Put an s: X> opposite the name o! each candidate you wish to
vote for, in the square indicated by the arrow.
COUNCILMEMBER - NWARD III
(VOTE FOft ONE>
IREN� MAERTENS
ED FITZPATRICK
1C
PAGE 5
GENERAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 198]
f. The names of the judges of the election are as fol]ows: ,
WARD 1- PRECINCT 1 WARO 1- PRECINCT 2-
�
Carolyn Holmen
Doris Tallaksen
Gay Gronlund
Clifford Ness
Majorie Rosin
Camilla Mueller
Sandra Goman
WARD 1 - PRECINCT 3
Charlene Swanson
Margaret Powell
Alice Mol
Rosalie Halling
Mathilda Johnson
Rosella Amar
WARD 3 - PRECINCT 2
Judy Engebretson
Nancy Strong
Dona Mae Odland
Dariene Vallin
Velma Farr
Jean Wagar
Joyce McLellan
Marlys Johnson
Shirley Kohlan
Mary E. Storley
Mary Sullivan
Evelyn Se7enski
WARD 3�- PRECINCT 1
Betty Bonine
Janet Kothman
Betty Scott
Roma Eastwood
Myrtle Morphew
Connie Samuelson
Lavonne Avery
Alice Anderson
WARD 3 - PRECINCT 3
Gladys Syverson
Bev Miller
Laverne Roseth
Jean Johnson
Gemaine Wolsfeld
Florence Gordon
Betty Nelson
1D
PAGE 6
HEALTH CARE FACILITIES
Norma Rust
�orothy Veres
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
COUNCILMEMBER
GENERAL ELECTION
NOVEMBER 3, 1981
�
MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE
lE
�
2
NOTICE
OF PUBLIC HEARING ON FINANCING
INDUSTRIAL DFVELOPMENT PROJECT
ON BEHALF OF LA MAUR INC. '
- NOTICE IS HEREBY GI'VEN that a public hearing shall be
conducted by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota
on an industrial development project proposed to be undertaken
and financed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, by the
City and LaMaur Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Company").
The hearinq will be held at the City Hall in said City on the 9th dav ,
Novemb�r_,,,T,. 1981, at 7:30 o'clock p.M. Tbe project as
proposed consists generally c�f acquiring, constructinq, equipping
and expanding of the Company"s existing manufacturing building.
Under the proposal, up to approximately $3,000,000 in principal
amount of Industrial Developrnent Revenue Bonds of the City of
Fridley will be issued to finance the project. At said time and
place the City Council shall give all parties who appear an
opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal
to undertake and finance the project. A draft copy of the proposed
Application to the Minnesota Commissioner of Securities for the
project, together with a21 attachments and exhibits thereto,
shall be available for public inspection, following publication
of this notice, in the o£fice of the City Clerk, Monday through
Friday, except legal holiday�s, from g: o'clock A.M. to
�;�p o'clock P.M. to and including the ate of hearing.
Dated iQcto�er� , 1961.
Publish: October 21, 1981
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
s
Clty Clerk - Sidney C. Inman
__�� . -�.- .��.__�� _.,-� .� �-
�b-�;s_�°�-n, :.,..�.. .m= _. . .-.--: - �-.:� .-,:��.-. =.�-xA.��•�,-,�- -.,:.q.r — - �. . . .. .. ...
.3., . � ,,.,...,. .---- y ..:...•,-,-,e: -._.... �
:� • � K � � . -�... . . .' . .. ` . . . .
TN@ C1TY OF
.3 �
DIRECTURATE o0
o: ' �
Q P °�d o
MEMORANDUM
- PUBLIC WORKS � � - : -
- � '
� •:
FRlt�L{ Y
.,.�� .. - - ----
- • ' � • 17�1�4i��[�TiFl�1i���"tC�
Revised Comprehensive Plan
The City of Fridley has been allowed an extension for submittal of the
Revised Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council, until November 13,
1981. The Revised Comprehensive Plan submitted this week incorporates
all of the concerns of the City Council and satisfies the requirements for
tf�e Comprehensive Plan. � -
Unless the Comprehensive P'lan is submitted on time, we will not be able to
receive the additional planning funds.
Recorrmend the City Council approve ihe Revised Comprehensive Plan for sub-
mittal to the Metropolitan Council.
JGF:ijk
:: . :::�. ,;:.:; :
iNFO•
„,,,o POLICE DEPARTMENIIT
`"� ���
'! `� � c�ty of F��diey
,..� ` �,
�— Minnesota
! DATE
l FROM
I SUBJECT
OCTOBER 21, 1981
J.P.HILL, PUBLIC SAFETY DIREC:
PROPOSED AMENDMEPIT TO
CHAPTER 602 OF THE FRTDLEY
CITY CODE
.. L*-r%y v ' � /�� r �.'� 0
� �. ��
?rf o�.� .9!
IVIEMORANDUM
�
� TO
NAST!�'I (?URESHI, CI'!'Y MGR.
4
INFO
X
Enclosed you will find the p:roposed amendment to Chapter 602 of
the Fridlev City Code entitl��d "Beer Licensing”. As I had indicated
to City Council at their reg�alar meeting of October 5, 1981, our
current ordinance regulating beer in the City of Fridley did not permit
a business to give away beer during a special event. In recommending
that the temporary on-sale b�eer license be denied, I indicated a
proposed amendment would be forthcoming to allow such an activity.
�
The proposed yamendment adds Subdivision 4 to Section 602.01 of the
current ordinance. Section 4 simply more clearly defines what the
term sale, sell, or sold is intended to mean and is consistant with the
definition in Minnesota State Statute.. Under Section 602.02 Subdivision
1, minor deletions have been made to make it permissive to give beer
away ��ithout a license. New Subdivision 5 under Section 602.02
explicitly provides for the exemption of the license while giving a�vay
free beer. In addition, Subdivision 5 still gives the City control
over the possibility of givina free beer away which �vould create a
public safety danger or ir_`ringement of peace and tranquillity or
violation of laws.�
Our beer ordinance as curren.tly written, technically makes-it a violation
for businesses within the ci.ty to even give away beer during open house
ceremonies. Within a very n�arrow sense, it could even be construed
as prohibiting home owners c►f giving away beer in their homes. Of course
this is not the intent or spirit of the ordinance therefore it is my
recommendation that Council act favorably upon the recommended
amendment.
JPH/sa
, �,� � : ��- � �
err a�nrrcE �n�c �� cF ��m� ci� co�
F1ITITL� "BE�? LICF�iS7QTG" BY ADDING SECTION 602.01 �
SL�DIV78IQN 4; At�IDdDING S�ECTIO�N 602.02, SUBDIV7SI�T 1;
ADD]I� SECTI�i 602.02, SUBDII�LSION 5; A1�iDING SECTIQ�I
602.07, �DNISII�1 1
►,� ►t M� � i M r • n � �,a. � �o � � � � �
. 1� ! I s 1 l� \�' Y�' .
�• '' : A.9 119Ed �Il ti]j+9 CY'�I8Y108� �9Ei'� Q' Ki�T!- �Yi'AX�C9�.I'g IIB�t. ZjQUOT'� II�3T�3 8T{j�
�It 13QtY1t' XSth Ari 81�Od'1013C W71�ri� OP �lY'E �'k'iil QT�-half Of Ol'� �2Y'QEEtlt t7j► VQ7.tII� ffi�
IIDt IDCY'2 �18Y1 �12'02 8Y1Q �.1J0-� p21`O�I'I� � iiP.�it•
2. TAVF�T: Means an esta� for the sale o�' beer, ei&�"s, �&'�''eites, all forms
a�' tobaco�, beverag�es, and soft drir�ss s�ld at �retail for cpr�tion on the pr�i.9es.
3. II�TAIt�t�'&NT: As hex�ein used is d�fir�ed to ir�clude, but not be limited to, musie,
�8� Pi�r ���8 eith� by the public ac per�'armex�, m�t�ion pict�es, expa�.i.tiac�,
perf�s, imle cr female reviews, fashio�� shows, Tii other than regular public
dzarmels, aarioe�ts, ar ar�► other deliberate act• intesxied to amu.9e cr entertain patrons
ar�d/or employees.
4• ���+� �1L' �1.�L�. � all �"�� �Y'J�9� ilarn�s�,i ne r or
rgn-intoxieating �lt linuor ir�cludinrz sueh iLu ;ah; in ��ti��?? or evasina�► of law
. �� r �►� t�J. �r. � r+a�
602.021. Lioer�es. No pPxson, e�accept wholesalers and manufacturers t,o the extent
anathar�zed by l.asa, shall deal in cr di.sPose o�' by �, sale �a" �df:l'i�r/1��, ar keep or
�S'i'er fcr sale, a� be� withir� the c3ty Nithc�ut first having received a lioense as
hem.ir�after Fravided. �ioen9es shall be o1' ti�ree kinds: (1) itegular °on-sale"; (2)
Teln�orary "on-sale"i (3) "Off-sale".
602.0?2. R��lar "On-.'Sa�.e"
Rq�lar "a�+s�.7.e" licen4es shall be �ted orrly to bor�a fide clubs, taverris, exclusive
Ron-sale" liquar stor�es, r�esta�.u�ants, and hotels wd�xe foai is pre�ar�ed and served for
oonsumpt,ion on the prenises. '�Or�sale" Iice.nses shall permit the sal.e of beer far
o�nsumpt�ion an the p�ises only.
602.OZi. Tenporary "Orr+.Sale"
T�porary Ran-sale" lioenses shall be g�ar�ted on�y to bor�a fide clubs and eharitable,
religiaas, aM non-prai'it crganizata.or�s far the sale of beer for consumption on the
Fra,ii.sPS on�y. Said tamperary Iioenses �a12 be g�anted up�n �.tt,en application to the
eity oota�cil uFon farms �vided by the city. Zhe Frovisions of Chapter b02, Frid].ey
City Cade, as applic�ible, srsall be obse,rved t�y said non-Frofit cr�nizat3ons.
602.02$. "Off�Sa].e"
"Off-sale" lioen9es shall p�rmit the sale o�f" beer at retail, in the origir�al package far
o�r�tion ofi' the premi.aes on]y.
. f � 1+.. ].,<.c m. . .
a+, - u• .!1! s� =' —" 4!: �Y� 1: • ! _�� �. • .�I►'z •r.�s:I.��'� •!!� � "�1 -� • �
• .�..y�-'- • � a� �� - •.���� - -� • rt-, s •. �u, � - _ • .._��
J _��_ - _t��� ►! .� I_ -.!• _L_ �- -!., - ti • --r �i' - �-t���_ .1�� - �- .
• _!�l�.' - • ��.- • �� •c- u aru� .i _l �".fl_c ! ! I' !_!: •
! ���:_J. • ��-.. l _I; ��_�_�, • _},- �_� I_�� ! • �. !�__1=- f'
i � � i��.
1 Y�'' .
�a ��:,.
• a� �• ��
���ru ; -
�
�� �•�•••.
�
��r `�C?�i �
�.1D„�1M►� ,
4A
PaBe 2 — Or�dirrame No. _
=.Y!}'_ • �� Ss l�- _�' �� - �.!_G • I�Yl�ti=u-} • �-_ - :I•
�L�l__ • �� _ �} • _ _ �� '• � -' ! !• • � -��-_�: • � -- •--
4: y '-�►t�� • • '���...� �: • �i"" ."- ��� • r�- • - -� • -u. � • -
�.���� .1• a• _!_� ! ��►� • � � �� �- • ��; �: - ? � - �: � _ • y� - ti�� • - - �
_�� � - • iu � ' u, � •
. 1� 1 I►� Q'' • 1: M11 '♦
�lreiy applicatio� for a lioer�se to sell bea• shall be m3de to the �ity Clerk on a fory�
a�pplieci by the City ar�d ooritaird.r�g such 3i�d"armation as the Clerk or the City Camcii
t�' recPiire• It s�hall be �mlawilil to malae ac�y false statc�ent in an application.
. �► � ►�y �� • sa
60¢.W1. Pa�+me.r�t Requir+ed
Ead� applicata.on fcr a lioer�se shall be acooa�anied by a r�e.ipt iY� �e city tr�ea.sur�r
for pqymerrt in i1�1.1 o�f the required fee for the lioerme. All fees s�hall be paid into
the gernxal i1.md of the 4.ty. UFon rejectic�a of any application for a license, the
lreasur�er shall re,tl.u�d the ano�ait paid.
602.042. F�iratlon; Pro Rata FeeB
k�r�xy lioer�se e�ept a t�npa�aiy lioen9e shall expire on the last dab► oP April of each
year. Ead� licer�e exeept a t�pa"ary lioense shall be issued for� a pPx iod of orye y�r,
e�ept that if a port,ion of the I�oerme year has elapsed �en the license is granted�
the lioerme shatl be issued for the remain�der of the year for a pro rata fee. In
c�omFx�tinB such fee, ar�pr Lu�expired f�action o.f a m�r�th sha].1 be c�mted as one month. A
t�pa�ary lic�en9e shall be i.ss��ed for a specific perfod in �rhich a special event to
whic� the sale is inGident is beirag held ar�d such peri.od shall be stated on the lioerne.
6�.043. Fees
E\rery "or�sale" lioen9e shall imlude an"o�ffi�sale" lioense. E�h "on-sale" lioense Pee
sizall jr�el.ude an"aff-sale" lioerzse at m adciitioral expense. D�e annaal arrl temporary
lioer�se fees and init,ial investig�tion fee shall be as g�avided in Chapter 11 of this
Code.
. 1� 1 t" � 1 1 IM5 �"
602.051. 7nv�t1gat3:on and hearSs�g
Zhe C�ty Cau�cil, ar its authcrized agerit, �Y;�all investigate all facts set out in the
application. Opportumity �all be given to ar.p� pes�on to be heard for or against the -
r�antir�g of the irri.tial '�or�-sale" lioerse. A,f`t�x sueh investig,ation ar�d hearing, where
applic�ble, the Cau�cil shall g�aa�t cr rei1�e the applicataon in its di.ga^etio�c�.
602.052. �ar�sfers
Ead� lioense �all be is.sued to the appifoant. only and shall not be
another holder. Eaeh l:ic�en9e �all be isscaed on�y for the pranises
app7ica�i�. No l�.oen9e shall be transferred to amther plaae without
the Ca,�dl.
.�• �. •�•.� � � i� � i: --�.• i�a �:,,
No lioen9e shall be �anted to ar held by ard petsan r�i�o:
1. Is wxler 19 years of a�e;
transferable to
deseribed in the
the approval of
2. Has, KS.thin five years �.ri,or to the appli�3ation fa� suc,h lioenee, bee�1 cyornicted oP
a felor�►, or af violating ar�► l�arr of this state or local ordinance relating to the
aanufact�u�e, sale, distribution, cr �ossession for sa].e m distxibution of intoxicat3ng
liquars a• bePr, and carmot shaw oom�etent ev:Cderbeunder Minnesota Statutes, Section
364.03, o�f' sufficient r�iatailation azd present;fitr�ess to perf'orsn the duties oP a beer
].ioet�e;
IM� Q''
' t Mt1 �
1►� L '
- s �.
�� � y
•��� �•���
F�IHAT�I;
PRO RATA
FEL�
- �:�
H' 1
� �y l�.
I y► 1 ' I/
�,)r ���L��_
%►71►��i'±�
��•,� �
� ia i �: -
�,• �a �
4B
�e 3 — adi�noe xo. ._._. , . - -
3. Is a�n�i`aetia�er oi' beer ar� is �rner�es.ted in t3�e oontr�oi cd' a�► plaae w2�ere beer is
man�f`�ctiu�ed;
$. Is mt of �od m�aral �ac,�ter and repute; if the applicant has been an o�rr�er,
marg8er', c�' employee of a saloon, intR1, r��ta�a�t, oafe, tavez�, ar other business of
a ai.�laz� �ture, tl�e City Caa�cil a� �rr��ider the applic�ent�s Past Perfcrmar�oe rec�d
ir� dete�nirri.�g �ether a lioense shall be � cr renewed.
5. Is a� d�u-irg the period of this licen:�e becomes the holder oP a federal retai#
liquor dea7.er's special tax stamp for �e :aa.le of intoxicating liqu4r at aoy plaoe;
u�less fl�ere has also bee� iss��ed to him a la�al lioen9e to sell into3dcattrg liqucr at
siach p].aoe; ac'
6. Is mt the proprieta� o�' the estahlistm�xit Par r�fiich �e lioense is iasued. (Ref.
14)
.,i± Ij � � M� I,ly _I 1:' ';�l; 1���� :+
� r:,.
1 Iy I 1' :�
602.O11. Di�ta►��fY+om,��m1� ard Qauri�es. F�;ept fbr those oruani�tions WhQ, tLVe DJSTANCE FAQ+I
,�ex�,�,ss�a ��y �?��es to sell mnintoxi�,tr,i'�g �mlt li��or u�rsuant � See ion SQ�OQS AI�ID
�Q� m lioen9e .fiall be �anted fcar ar.�y place Within 300 feet of any public or C'�URQ�.S
para�l sc�ool cr withtn 300 feet of ar� ch�arh. In app]ying this restriCtion, the
di stanoe shall be m�s�ed in a strai�t line fY�om the s�hool cr chi.a�ch build3ng to the
�in public entrarioe af the pramises de.9eribed in ti�e applioatfor�. (�f. 294)
6Q2.OT2. No lioer�se shall be �^a¢�ted far ope.ration on ar�' Fr�ises upon rrhich taxes or
a�es�nts or o�er fl�ancial elaims of the City are de].ir�querit ard i,a�paid.
. 1+ 1: •1 III 11 ��' 1�� l�:
602.081. Ger�al Condit�3o�ns
Et�e�y lioense �al.l be �anted subject to the oorditior�s in the fa1la,�ing subdivisions
and all o�er Fravisions of thi.s ordin2noe and of a� o1�er applicable crdir�ac�ce oP the
City cr state laa.
6Q2.�2• S3�.� TO I�i1C]Of'3 �' 711t.07dCdtAd i�i"90i'B
No beer shall be sold ar served to ar�► into:xicated person or to any person under 19
year's Of aBe. iRef. �17)
502.083. Cor�tion By Mim�s
I3o mirrr shall be permitted to oons�.une beE�- an the lioen9ed pr�i�es.
6o2.08q. Et�tayme.nt o�' Mimrs
No person tmder 19 shall be �played on the � o�f a tavern, except that persons
i.u�der 19 �Y be emplayed as razsic3.ans, bu�boys ard Idtchen help. (Aef. 675)
6oe.0�5. G�blir�g
No �nblis�g or ar�' 8�,b].ir�B devioe shall be pPxmitted on ar�► lioensed pr�i9es.
602.086. Ir�ter�est oP ar S�leSalera
No m�nufact�.u� or wholesaier of beer shall have any awnership or interest in an
�staW.iahment licensed to sell at retail oontrary to the provisions of Minnesota
St,..*utes. Pb retail lieensee and ma�x�f`acbn^er cr �olesaler of bcer shall be parties to
ar�► �aaclusive ptu�se oontract. No retall lioer�ee shall rern.ive at� bene,fits oor�irary
to lax fYbm a manufaetureer or Wholesal�er oP beer and no such manufaetureer or
kholesaler shal.l oonfer ar�r b�efits oontrary to l.aFt upon a retail lioe.�c�see.
�� u u �
� IMy l�
� I�' :
��ii u�
. ;,. i
11 �.•� 1 '
i u� � ���
• �+•�.. �
•� ` ti r u
�i •:•.
�i�T�i' �r
� n � •.
. ,: �
i �• y. �
i •�a•�
�• � :
a•,
�
4C
Pa�e 4 — 4�clirptloe No. _,
t�.o87. r.� nea�erts sr,a�
No liaensee shall sell beer �fii].e holding or exhibiting in the Iicensed premises a
federal retail liquor dealer•s special tax stamp inless he is lioer�sed �mder the la�s of
l�ii�r�esota to sell irito�dc�at3rg ],i�quor�s.
6Q2.088. Sales of It�taodoat�g Li,cP,�oe'
No lioer�see t�o is mt also liaet�ed to ae]1 into�daatir�g Ltquoa^ ar�d t,d� does mt hold $
upublie�zir3�cirg plaoe lioerme" shall se1.l or permit the oonsumption and display of
i.rito�daetir�g Liqu�rs on the lioer�sed pr�i��es oc ser�ve ar�p► liquids for the purpose at
�d.�dsg F►ith ir�toxieatirg liquor. �e Fr�:r�oe o�' �ntoxicatitg liquor�s on the pre�i.ses
af such a lfoer�ee shall be prima facie evi.deme of poasession of into�dcating liqu�rs
far the p�,�pose �' sale; and the servirg oi' ar�y ].iq�itd for� the purpose of mixing �►ith
irito�dcatirg liquor is beirg permited to t�e oonsumed or displayed contrary to this
a^di.r�anoe.
602.089. �P��
Ar�► Pclioe offioer cr health irBpecta� a�y enter, inspect ar�d seardi the pre�ises of a
lioer�ee �u'iraB busir��.s ha.u^s Frlthout a search a¢�d seiz�me warrant and may seize all
intoxicatirg L•Lquars ar�d other evidenoe of violatioris famd on the Iioer�sed pr�ises i.n
violation of this crdir�noe.
6Q2.0810. Lioea�see ResporBibilitY
j� shall be resp�nsible for the oonduct a�' �,� plaoe a2' business and sh all
m�intai.n oonditions of sobriety and or�der. The act of any employee on the lioensed
R'eni-qes autharized to sell cr sex•ve beer shall be deemed the aet of the licensee as
wp11 and the lioer�see shall be liable to all penalties provided by this ordinance
�t��Y r�ith the �aplc�yee.
602.09. Horn�s
602.0g1. Ct.(�II�1G Ho[l1iS
No sale o�t' beer' shall be mad�e o�n ar� S1.u�y bet� the hours of 1: 00 a. m. and 12: 00
mon, mr between the ha,�s of 1:00 a. m. and 8: 00 p. m. on the da�y of any statewide
election. No sale sha7.1 be made be� the hau�s of 1: 00 a. m. and 8: 00 p. m. on ar�r
oth� day. (Ref. 501, 550, 602, 647)
. 1► 1•� '�� • 1 1 1 •• 9 1���.
It shall be �,u�1.�afL1 foc ar�r per�sons ar wstcmer�s, other than the lioerLSee cr i'L'fs/ their
enplayees, to rc�,ain on the prenis�s after 1:30 a.m. � shall be no oonsumption by
� P�'��, ���8 L'!!?� l.ioermg�s or al'Li� thelr �nplcyees, ai'tes� 1:30 a. m.
602.10. Q�SS
No elub shall sell be� e�a;ept to mc�bers and to �uests in the oomp�ry a�' m�ers.
602.11. RHS'IRIGTICNS CN Pt1A(Xit�SE AND 0�
602.111. Age Mi.sre�ser�taticn
%� i�IiQ"$ 5Y1�1 17Jt IIl�.Si'E'� �.�'12� �� t'Q' �'1@ pl�'p0.9B 0� Obt2l�Y�.� �'•
����2� �l:C,�.i� �'C$139@
NO j�T'90t1 Shall j.IldUO2 fl�Y1C[' t0 �'d139� i�' jY�OC�,IC`e �@['.
�i.�.•
� :I�
: ,.
:�. .
i �� ��
i• • �
���.:�.�JM�� �
►�y t��-
•y.•��ri r4.
� � •.
'�zi Yi
i � i �.
'� :111
I � I1.`+5.
M :♦
��a. �• u �
� •M .�
i� �� �n �•
i�
H'
11� ' �+' ' y.�?
11_ �
1 11 M 1
i �1s��':_,_�
4D
Pa�e 5 — Qdi�me No. _
6Q2.113. Pcnaa�emeat
No per�son oth� 1i�an the parent cr le�l ��rdi.an shall �roa��e bea� Pcr ar�► mdnar.
6Q2.11�. �bssesaioo
� Misxrs shall mt hanre beer in yt,i� ,�j,Z p�os�essi� With 1i�e ir�t,ent to cbr��me it at a
plaoe ath� than the ha�ehold of �d S�iC Par'�� a' �• -
V�lfG�1�5r w'u°'YM+w�s
No mimr� aha11 mngume beer on the lioe�ed pr�dse.s.
602.116. I��ar Cor�a�t,ian ard Dfspl�y
No person st�ll cnr�ame cr disgla�y arq► ir�toxicaat�.ng l.i.quo� an the p�emiaes af a liaen9ee
ia�less said lfoen9ee is also liaer�sed to sell i.�Ytoxicat.icg liquors or holds a"public
���B Plaoe lioen�e".
.1� � ��' • 1 � lM� " .��� I'1:,1
No per�n operatirg an establishment in the �+usiness of selling, permitting to be
di.sp].ab►ed or c�nsumed an irYtoxioating liquor c� non-intoxicating ma2t liquor shall
permit ar�► entertairment on the pr�mLi�ses witrio�rt having secnu,ed a lioer�se ircm the City
Ca.u�cil to petTait siach .
602.73. �OCATI�
�e violation of ar�y pravision or oorYiition of this ordinanee by � beer licensee,q a�
ni.� ,�he}� agents is grcx.md fcr revaat3on a� suspen�,ion of the lioer�e. Zhe license of
ar�► pers�n Who holch a federal retail liquor deaZer's special tax stamp without a
liaer�e to sell isrtoxicatirg ].i,quors at such plaoe �all be revaked without notice and
Frithait t�ear3rg. 7r� all other ca.ses, e�ept r�e m�r�data�y r�vocat�on is provided by
law withcx�t mtive and hearing and exeept Wl.�ere suspension may be made without a
hear3r�g, the holder of the lioen9e shall be gr,3nted a hearing upon at least 10 d�ys
mtioe before revocation ar suspension is ordex�ed. Zhe rr�tioe shatl state ihe time and
plaoe af hearirg ar�d the mture of the eharges ag�sinst the lioer�ee. .
�9�/•��:/�C��'�Rb�
�sz�/,7,ii,�ti�i�xjii�id�i#�z/r�/�.,�,�'i�x�,�ri',�zrt�i�t�,�
z�i�v���ix���r�it,�,ciia���z�i��i�xxn�rr�x�.�i��i
�C�di�/!��/P'bXX��b�$!/////////////////////////i'///////////////////////
��!///////////////�////////////////F.�////////////////////
602//////////////////////kYi/S�.r�/////////0///�,100/Irbl ���t`,i6�'i/F�E
PASSID AND ADOPT� BY TI� CT1Y O�F FRII7IEY 1i�5 AAY (F
1961
W�LL71�M J. I�E - MAYOR
AT1f�T:
SIDNEY C. llarlAN - �ITY (�tK
F3rst Readis�g: October ?b, 1981
Seoord R�disg:
Pub].i�i:
�� 4 E
P�
►1 ti '� I' I 1
u�••
•�rir u
�� �r.•
a ��• � � �
It5 L"
•��� i•�s�
R�i10CA1'�1
Fn�m thc desk o!
� NASiI�i QUREBHI
CiTY D1A.TrTAGER'S UFFICE
�TE: October 15, 1981;'
1B�lECT: Request by Fridley Firefighters Relief
Association to Upgrade their Pension �
� Benefits.
�'d3-ra�G Cii� !� � t' �/ -1.—,�!/
u/, �• 5 �; +✓` � f --�-�-- t � �
��..�
--^----- — r
�t
f
. MEMQRANDUM SI_g �
nman,
TO _ ACT�Qt�� I�JFG �
See the attached material suppli�ed by the Fridley Firefighters Relief Association
requesting the pension benefit iincrease. Please give me an independent judgement
that this increased benefit in n�� way in the future would put any burden on the
City and that the revenue receiv�ed through the insurance premium allocation to the
Relief Association will be suffi�cient to cover future liabilities of the associa-
tion benefits.
Thank you.
:.-NMQ/ms
Attachment - Original Copy
October 19, 1981
T0: NASI�? M. QURESHI
Attached is a memorandum from Mr. Charles McKusick, President of the relief
association. I have been involve�d in the discussions over the two amendments
from the beginning and I would like to make the following cormnents:
1. The increase to the base serv�ice pension benefit from $192 to $200.
I concur with t�lr. McKusick tf�at according to the actuarial this will not
cause the Fridley Fire Relief' Association to go into an unfunded liability
position. Additionally, I ha�ve investigated and concur with Mr. McKusick
that this is in keeping with Minnesota Statutes and the Fridley Fire Pension
Association By-Laws.
2. A change in the benefit formula for those firefighters who exceed the twenty
years. After reviewing the �dditional letters from the actuarial and after
additional discussions with F1r..�lcKusick, I would concur. I also recommend
this change as it does not place the pension association in an unfunded
liability position. .
If you have any questions, be sur•e to let me know. ,
SCI:sh
Attachment
�
e ,
� . �
FRIDLEY VOLUNTEIER FiREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION
6�t31 University Avenue N.E.
1=�idley, Minnesota 55432 •
t612) 571-3455 � �
September 24, 1981
T0: Sid Inman
FROM: Chuck McRusick
RE: Council Resolution to R:itify Relief Association By-Law Changes
Z would appreciate your assistance by providing me with the appropriate
resolution format for the Cit:y Council's ratification of our two by-law
amendments.
I can then draft the resoluti:on which would recite that the by-law
amendments were recommended f'or adoption by the Relief Association's
Board of Trustees, duly adopred by the Association's membership, and
fully funded as evidenced by the actuarial valuation dated May 18, 1981
of the Association's Special Fund. Ratification by the City Council is in
accordance with Minnesota St�tutes 424A.02 and 69.773.
I will review the draft resol.ution with you before submitting it to the
City Manager.
I am enclosing a draft of my letter to the City Manager describing the
by-law amendments. I would appreciate your comments or suggested changes
to the letter.
Thank you for your continuing assietance.
CM/el
Enclosure
1
i'
I
�
�'' -
5B
FRIDLEY VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432 -
(6121571-3455 �
October 13, 1981
Mr. Nasim Qureshi, City Manager
City of �Fridley
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Dear Mr. Qureshi:
City Council Ratification of Firefighters
Reiief Asso�ciation By-Law Changes
The membership of the Fridley Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association duly
adopted two changes to its by-laws, at a special membership meeting on
September 3, 1981. Minnesota Stat.utes 424A.02 Subdivision 9a which is
applicable to post retirement bene�fit increases, and Chapter 69.773 Subdivision
6, which is applicable to by-law a�mendments affecting benefits payable from
the Association's Special Fund, rFquire ratification of those amendments by
the municipality's governing body. Accordingly, we respectfully request that
this item be placed on the City Cc�uncil agenda.
The two amendments are:
1. Increase the base service� monthly pension benefit from $192.00 to
$200.00 effective January► 1, 1981 for all Association members who are
disabled, deferred or ser•vice pensioners as of the date of the City
Council's ratification of` this benefit change.
The purpose of granting a ret:roactive benefit increase at this time was
to avoid any 1981 unfunded SF►ecial Fund liability. As noted on page 3 of
the attached Actuarial Valuai:ion dated May 18, 1981, our January 1, 1981
Special Fund assets of $734,�92 exceeded our accrued liability of $732,109
by the amount $2,283. That s�urplus together with a 1981 surplus support
of $31,000 produces no unfuncied liability resulting from the benefit
increase. We are pleased th�t we can again provide a pension benefit
increase without any contribution by the City.
Mr. Nasim Qureshi, City Manager
�
CM/el
October 13, 1981
Page 2
2. The second amendment becomes effective January 1, 1982. It changes
the benefit formula for members who have served the fire department
for more than 20 years. For each year of service in exceSs of 20
years, the retiree will receive an additional one twentieth (1/20) of
the base service pension. For example, a member who retires with 23
years service would receive at age 50:
a. $200 per month b�ase service pension
b. plus 1/20 times $200 or $10 for each year of service over
20 years. 3 additional service years times $10 per year
equals $30. The retiree would receive a$230 monthly pension.
In the past we had provided a fixed amount of $4.00 per month benefit
increase for each year of service over 20 years. This new benefit
formula will apply to all cur�rent and future retirees. Its intent is to
recognize that each year of firefighting service has equal value to the
City.
Attachment
Very truly yours,
������/.�
Charles J. McK sick
President
5C
�
�
Mr. Charles MeKusiek
President
Fridley Firefighters Relief As�;ociation
6431 University Avenue Northea:�t
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Dear Chuck:
iOWERS, PERRIN, FOR5iER & CR06BY
2850 MEiRO DRIVE
MIN�APqJS, MiMVESOTA 55420
.- (b12) 85d-1155
September 29, 1981
We have received your letter d�ted September 2u, 1981 and have noted the
proposed change in the post-20 year service eredit to "1t20th of the base
pension." This is the assumpti.on we used to calculate the valuation results
presented in our letter dated Hiay 18, 1981•
The benefits shown on Attachmer.�t 1 of the letter refer only to the $9.60 benefit
which was used for all years of' service up to a maximum of 30 years. These
benefits were exhibited because: they were in effect on the valuation date.
Nevertheless, when we calculate�d the contribution amounts shown on page 3 of our
letter ($200 Base Service Pensi.on), we assumed a$10.00 benefit accrual for all
years of service up to a maximu�m of 30 years.
In conclusion, we wish to state� that the values shown on page 3 of our letter
dated May 18, 1981 would accurately reflect the cost of the pension plan if the
two By-Law ehanges presented in. your letter of September 24, 1981, were
ratified.
TJK/TdH:emc
Sincerely yours,
Thomas J. man, F.S.A.
Consultant
`•��_�� � ���.5�..___.
Thomas J. Holm, A.S.A. '
Advanced Actuarial Analyst
5D
:�
FRIDLEY VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION
Towers, Perrin,
2850 Metro Drive
Mpls, 1�'Il� 55420
6�431 University Avenue N.E.
IFridiey, Minnesota 55432
i612) 571-3455
September 24, 1981
Forster � Crosby
Attenticn: Thomas J. Aolm, ,A.S.A.
Dear Mr. Solm:
Actuarial Valuation dated May 18, 1981
This is in reference to our telephone conversation concerning subject
actuarial valuation. I advised you that our association adopted two changes
to its By-Laws:
� 1. The monthly base se�rvice pension is increased from $192.00 to
' $200.00 effective Januarq 1, 1981. This adjustment is applicable to all
current pensioners.
2. The post 20 year se:rvice credit is changed from the current fixed
$4.00 per year of post 20 ye,3Y service, to "1/20th of the base service
pension". This benefit becomes effective January l, 1982 and is also
applicable to all pensioners. This change has no retroactive application.
On page 4 of subject valuati��n, you used the post 20 year service credit
of $9.60. In view of the $2�0 per month base service pension, the post
20 year service credit will be $10.00 per month. Accordingly, it will be
necessary for us to have a letter from you supplementing your May 18, 1981
report advising af the effecx of the fortq cent difference as to our
annual support requirements :3nd any 1981 unfunded liability. Your letter
will be attached to your May report and submitted to our City Council at
the time that we request rat.Lfication by the Council of the two By-Law
amendments.
CJM/el
�
Very truly yours,
G�L��� . `� �,��!-�I�
Charles J. McK sick
Presideat
5E
0
0
Mr. Charles McKusiek
President
Fridley Firefighters Relief Association �
6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Dear Chuck:
iOWERS, PERRIN, FORSTER & t�tOSBY
2ESG M.:� DR' T
MIttJ�EAPDUS, MI'�r�eSGT,4 55C2C
�_ (612j 8�-�"55
May 18, 1981
We have completed the January 1, 1981 Actuarial Valuation of the benefits pro-
vided by the Fridley Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association. The valuation
results presented below are based on the plan provisions outlined in
ATTACHMENT I and the actuarial assumptions in ATTACHMENT II to this letter. As
we indicated to you on the phone, �we have also shown the normal cost, actuarial
or accrued liability and minimum r�equired contribution for each increase of �1
in the base service pension. This should help you to determine the amount of
benefit ]evel increases in 1g82 wi�thout undertaking an actuarial valuation of
the plan.
1. Number of Members
Active
Retired
Disabled
Deferred Vested
Total
2. Normal Cost
- Service retirement and
post-retirement survi.vors'
benefits
- Pre-retirement surviv�ors'
benefits
- Permanent disability benefits
- Temporary disability henefits
32
11
1
1
�5
Current
Benefit
Level
#18,599
3,373
1,152
1,089
�2u,213
Each Increase of
�1 per month� in
Base Service Pension
� 97
18
6
NtA
�121
5F
TOWERS, !'ERRIN. FORSiER !� CR06EY
� �EiTERTO Mr. Charles MeKusick
s►�r rvo TWo
Dah May 18, 1981
3. Actuarial or Accrued Liab.ility
- Actives
� - Service retirement and
post-retirement survivors'
benefits
- Pre-retirement survi.vors'
benefits
- Permanent disabilit,y benefits
- Temporary disabilit;y benefits
4.
5•
6.
7•
8.
9•
Total
Aetuarial or Accrued Liability
- Inaciives
- Retired and disabl�:d members
- Deferred vested men�bers
Total
Total Actuarial or Aecr»ed Liability
(3) + (4)
Actuarial Value of Assets
Unfunded Liability or (Surplus)
Minimum Required Contri.bution
(chapter 201 of Minnesota Statutes)
- Normal Cost
- Amortization of Ut�funded
Liability
Total
1980 Level of Support
�317,010
6,942
6,3�7
5,445
�335,704
�367,3b5
2g,Oko
�396,40�
�732,109
73��392
(2,283)
� 24,213
0
$ 2��213
� 55,6�10
� assumes no increase in tempor�ary disability benefit
;1,651
36
33
N/A
���720
��,9�3
151
�2,064
#3,784
N/A
N/A
121
289
� 410
5G
YOWERS. PEQRiN. FORSTER d CR06lY
LETTERTO Mr. Charles McKusick
S�Et rvo Three
a4h May 18, 1g61
The surplus of �2�283 (excess hf assets over aetuarial or accrued �iability)
does not leave much room for bFnefit improvement� While avoiding an-unfunded
liatiility as of January 1, 1981. However, your 1980 level of support of �55,640
is gpproxi.mately �31,000 above the 1981 required eontribution. This 331,000
eould justify an increase in ti�e base service pension to �200 per month for
active and inactive members, si.nce the increase in both the normal eost and
actuarial or accrued liability (due to this benefit inerease) fs approximately
�31,000 as shown below. Theref'ore� the unfunded liability would be eliminated
in 1981.
1. Normal Cost
2. Actuarial or Accrued L,iability
- Actives
- Inactives
- Total
3•
4.
5•
Actuarial Yalue of Ass.ets
Unfunded Liability
t2) - (3)
Normal Cost
Unfunded Liability
Total
6. 1980 Level of 5upport
�200 Base Service Pension•
� 25,181
3u9,46u
412 917
7�
73��392
27,989
25,181
27�969
53�170
55,640
• assumes no increase in temparary disability benefit
The maximum amount of inerease in the base service pension (and all other bene-
fits except temporary disability) is a 41x increase to $270 per month. The
mini.mum required contribution (as required by the Minnesota Statutes) is
$56,032• This compares with a 1980 level of support of �55,b�0. The normal
cost, acerued or actuarial lia�ility and the unfunded liability for this benefit
level are shown below:
1. Normal Cost
2. Actuarial or Accrued Liability
- Actives
- Inactives
- Total
� 33,b51
469�864
557 397
1,027r�
5H
t0'WERS. PERRIN. FORSTER t CR06�1f
, �aTO Mr• Charles MeKusick
s�r nio Four
cwh May 18, 1961
3.
�!.
5.
6.
Actuarial Value of Assets
Unfunded Liability
Minimum Required Contributi.on
- Normal Cost
- Amortization of Unfunded Liability
in 20 Years
- Total
1980 Level of Support
73u�392
� 292,869
33,b51
22, 3g�
� 56,032
55,640
�
You Will notice in ATTACi�1ENT I tha.t we assumed that the benefit credit after 20
years of service is �9•60, instead of �4.00. We had agreeded to this change in
our last conversation.
We certify that the valuation resu��ts are correct and calculated in aecordance
with the requirements of Chapter 2A1 of the Minnesota Statutes. Please call us
if you have any questions.
Best regards,
� ,
�� �����
LS ,
Thomas J. Kuh�rman, F.S.A.
Consultant
�� �
Thomas J. Holm, A.S.A.
Advanced Actuarial Analyst
TJK/TJH:cmf
Attaehments
5I
ATTACHMENT I
As of January 1, 1981� the Plan. provided the follaaing major benefits:
_
1. =Retirement Benefit: �"
a. Requirements for retirement:
50 years of age
20 years of service
Benefit is �192 per month after requirements are met
b. Additfanal monthly annuity after minimum requirements are met:
g.60 per year of ,service in excess of 20
(Maximum benefit �2$8.00)
2. Permanent Disability Benefit_
a. Requirements (years of service and age3:
(1) In line of duty:
None for bot2� full-time and volunteer members.
(2) Not in line of dur.y:
10 years of �ervice.
b. Benefit:
(1) In line of duty:
� 1 g2 per mont;h.
(2) Not in line of dut:y:
$103.68 plus �8.83 for each year of service in excess of 70,
deferred to a�ge 50.
{Maximum henE�fit �192)
3. Temporary Disability Benefit.:
Requirement:
Benefit:
Requirement:
Benefit:
In line of duty.
After 20 days, 2-1J2 units,
maximum 30 weeks, may be extended by 2/3 vote of Board
Not in line of duty.
2-1/2 units, maximum 30 weeks.
As of January 1, 1981, the unit value is �3.00
4. Earlv Retirement Benefit:
a. Requirements for retirement:
Between 10 and 20 years of service.
If not attained age 50, benefit is deferred to age 50.
b. Benefit:
Lump Sum equal to �Ox base service pension x 12, per year of ser-
vice.
5J
0
, . ' SK
.
ATTAC.HMENT I (Continued)
5. Survivors' Benefit for Spou�:e (Monthly Annuity)
a. Before retirement of ine:mber: -
(1) In line of duty: =-
£� �103•68 to �12u.80 per month. _
_ (2) Not in line of dut.y:
�103•68 to �124.80 per month provided deceased member had at
' least 10 year�s of service.
b. After retirement of inember:
�103•b$ to 312�•80 per month.
6. Survivors' Benefit for Chilclren (Monthly Annuity):
a. Before retirement of ine�mber:
��12.24 per mc►nth payable until age 18.
b. After retirement of ineniber:
Same.
7. Inactives' Benefits:
Same as level for acti��e members.
�
AT�ACHMENT II
ACTUARIAL AS.3UMPTIONS AND METHODS
AS RECOT�NDED IN THE 1979 EXPERIENCE STUDY
Mor�ality:
Investment Rate:
Withdrawal:
Permanent Disability:
Temporary Disability:
Retirement Age:
Asset Basis:
�
1g?i Group Annuity Mortalitg-Table
5x
A rate of withdrawal of 7x from age 20 to
30 decreasing uniformly to 0 at age 45
with no withdrawal after that age.
Rates of permanent disability Were
adopted from experience of the New York
State Employees' Retirement System, gra-
duated and extrapolated as reQuired for
this valuation. Rates of recovery and
mortality for disabled lives Were taken
from tables used by the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) based on
Social Security disability experience.
19�7-�9 Basic Morbidty Table
The assumed age at retirement is the
later of age 55 or the age when 20 years
of service is achieved. (Average age at
retirement has been approximately age 57)
Value reported by state auditor.
Cost Method: Entry Age Norma2
5L
RESOLUTIQN N0. 1981
RESOLUTION IN OPPOS:[TION TO INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE -
- REVENUE RULING 81-5i3 --
:--
WNEREAS, The Internal Revenue Service has issued Revenue Ruling 81-58
that appears to remove the exE�mption on earnings of police and fire
relief associations from fede�°al taxation, and
WHEREAS, the effect of this ruling could result in the more doubling
of the cities annual contribui:ion to the police and fire pensions funds,
and
WHEREAS, the effect of this ruling results in double taxation and a
tremendous burdon on all taxpayers in the City of Fridley.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE[), that the City Council of the City of
Fridley urges its United States Senators, Boschwitz and Durenberger, and
Representative Martin Sabo to work closely with our police and fire
relief associations to obtain an extension of the effective date of
Revenue Ruling 81-58 by one ye�ar, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that i:he City Council of the City of Fridley
supports the immediate passage of legislation correcting the exemption
problem by creating an exempt;ion similiar to the exemption teachers have
under I.R.C. 501(C)(11), makir�g it retroactive if necessary.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITIf COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF � , 1981.
MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK - SIDNEY C. INMAN
5ti
........, __...�. . _ . . �. . . . . . . „ . . . _ .. - -
• . 50
' .� .
Minne;>ota Police Pension Council
1616 HUMBOLDT
. - WES1'. !iT. PAUL, MINNESOTA SS11S
►;i:��[rH 4'� K�I:u
rKrswr.� �
�10KT1' i)!?HN
cu r rkt urn.�i
t'HUCK A\1DE.RtiOn
�I t'Mh 1�R1 , llcl A\L:RI R
Dear Member:
:-
October 27, 1981
�
The joint Police F, Fire 7'ax Exempt Committee is currently
engaged in taking the necessary measures to prevent IRS Ruling
S1-SS from being effec:tive 1-1-82.
You help is solicited in your association asking your City
Council to pass the attached suggested resolution with your
Council forwarding the passed resolution to their respective
Congressional Representatives as soon as possible.
Thanks much in these important matters of mutual concern.
Chuck Anderson
yl�*1i3ER OF NAT1UtiAL CONFEiRENCE UN PUBLiC EMYLUI'LE RL'I IK��IENT 51'S7E'�-1S
PRO(3LEi4
�
._. ._ _..� Fire Relief Associations have apparently lost their exemption
�rom federal income tax under section 501 (c)(4) of the Internal Revenue
iode. The Internal Revenue in R�v. Ruling 51-58. has held tt�at �onprofit
police officer associations, whi�:h are primarily enyaged in providing
retirement benefits to members and death benefits to the beneficiaries of
members do not qualify for exemption fron federal income tax under I.R.C.
code section ,O1(c)(4). Since full time and Volunteer Fire Relief
Associations are organized similiar to Police Relief Associations and
have been previnsly exempt from federa] taxation under the same code
section� Rev. Ruling u1-53 would appear to apply Co them as �rell.
7he tax consequentes of this ruling on our re7ief association, if it is
upheld, are staggering. The tax rate on
earnings run as high as SOX. Th�e annual
more than double in order to re�lace the
and co�tributions. 7he city is required
that meets the normal cost and �imortizes
during the next 30 years.
HISTORY
corporate excess retained
contribution by the city could
taxed eernings on invest+nPn:s
to provide a level of f undinc
any exisiing actua�';al deficits
Poiice and Fire Relief Associat�ions throughouL i��innesota were placed
under the 501(c)(4) exemption b.� the I.R.S. during the last tt•,enty ye�►-s.
The problem appears to lie in the f act that 501(cj(4j does no� ur+ its
face describe Police and Fire RNlief Associations. 7he I,R.S. I�as bepn
challenged by other groups, sucln as civil riyhts urgani2ations, +:i�o�r
hav2 been denied-exemption unde�r 501(c);4). As a result thc I.�:.S. has
reevaluated existing Exe��pted groups.
Ti�e 1.R.S. has forrnally notified the Crookston, t•tinnesota Police Relier
Association and at least one other Relief Association that as � result cf
Rev. Ruling 81-58, they will no longer qualify as being exemrt �rom fpderoi
tax under 501(E)(4). Two Relief Associations within !-iinnpsota ha��e recievEu
private legai opinions that they are covered Ly �ev. Ruling 81-5u. Th�SE
associations have by-la��s and c�perate s�miliar to most Po]ice and Fire ke�icr
Associations throughout the State of ;�1i»n�sota. The in�act will ther�fort
be felt throughout the entire S,tate
SOLUT l OtLS
Dealing with the I.R.S is never• easy �nd us�ally time cor,sur.�ing. Our
time table for action is short„ since quarterly rstimates r1i11 be duc�
on April 1. 1982. An appeal st�ould be fiied with the Commissioner ;,f
the I.R.S.. Legal action shou'Id be pursued in Gistrict co�rt as opaosed
to taX'court. 7his wouid requ�ire the payr►ent o` the cortested taxes but
would preserve the right to apueal.
5P
'fhe most appropriate solution would appear to be the addition of an
exemption for Police and Fire Relief Associations similiar to the exemption
that exists for Teachers Retir�ement Fund Associations located at I.R.C.501(c){11).
This would require federal legislation. A c�ordinated ef�ort betv,een thp
Relief Associations, City Staff and the Council wi11 be needed to acco,:,�iish
this.
I• `� •.�-o-.y-'c.,.; :%fi �':�.:� ,..; .s:,,.. _ �,t"Yr:.?"'""'� �..'.. �."'Tt':.. `T':�' 't..�-'..: j . _ _ .. ... .. . .' -.
i� . � . . . . .. . . . .
; ,
�
ITME CITY Oi �
pIRECTORATE
� � �F
PUBLIC WpR�CS
�
ii
t FR1o�e�r
DATE ` ` � NC
FROM D.P.W.
SUBJECT
Brott]und Estates Property
Approval
6 _.�
00
�
00
MEMORANOUM
�_
TO
ACTIONI INFO•
The Brottlund lst Addition Plat was approved by the City Council on
January 23, 1978 with two stipulations: that there be an additionai
ten foot easement dedicated along East River Road; and the park fee
of $600 be received.
Mr. Brottlund was not able to record the plat and on h9ay 21, 1979, the
City Council re-approved the final plat with the same stipuiations.
Since that time, Mr. Brottlund has now been able to obtain the necessary
documents to record the plat and is requesting approva] by the City
Council in accordance with o�r City Code No. 211.
We have not received the plat: indicating the ten foot snow storage
easement along East River Road, nor the park fee. In 1981, residential
plats require a$1,000 park fee per iot. Accordingly, the City Council
shouid determine the amount c�f the park fee to be obtained with the
final approva] of the plat.
JGF:ijk
�
�
:� ����
'� /��\ .
. � ���/ ,` .
.. `��� ;
• , •• �
�
City of Fridley
City Hall
b431 University Ave. NE
Frfdley, Minnesota
City Council:
REALTY WORLD�—Cadwallader
3901 Silver Lake Road, St. Anthony, Minnesota 55421
Telephone: {612) 781-T484 -
October 19, 1981
re: Property located at 6431 and 6433 East River Road
"Brottlund Estates"
I am reguesting the reapproval of the platting of the attached property.
The reason for the need for the council's reapproval is the following:
After the council's iinitital approval; approximately two
years aga, the platting was submitted to the co�ty for
their approval. The �county requested at that time that
discrepancies in the :Legal description be cleared up. To
complete their requirements I have had to to the following:
- Complete a "Qu:iet Title" action
� -=��o through 2 Torrence Proceedings
- Placing of jud:tcial land marks required by torrence
action.
I am requesting approval uncier the same terms and conditions as made
when the plat was origional:Ly approved, because the city has split
the property for taxation s:tnce 1980 payable taxes. Thank-you.
Best Rega ,
�
J.A. dwallader III
JAC:crc
Enclosure
�
'i4 WORLD ot Difference'�
Each Offlce intlependently owned and operated
�o-a�
6 �i
�
—�� � r— C�T: M�.IR1�L�. � �
\��: •�:,;�'r,: �- • �
` � ; :�'' ;"�:,:' ;;�*� � _ _ ..._ � ,�
..`,1 - � ' 1 ...r �,.a.ie.'�i�nd;,i�'�m; 3 � .�.� ��� . � `I � :� _.' . I
��-;}�� — •`.�� � re�awmr� . L:L � ..�.�
1�D=-,�,�C�-�� � - — _ 3 '
J` ; `„I I � ,_ _.. � � -
� �L�._.1,\� � � � -
- � J ��� � i �� g = - � ..
- . � �� ��.�. �.(�'� � �� ►=- : - ,
� �+� �\`�'� �ti�x, �,..LL'!1� ��� •'� V��--
�,y,���v^ ``� `� °�-, ��I ,,,�'� �o
� '''�'.,� t It �� '�' � � , i s �..EI,
�\ '.. � , :�)f � � ��J �� ,.��'�i� ;� )1�t 1 '1�#'+- !:— J'� - -� -�* _
�
s,,o, � � � ��''� �� : , � _ �� ���F --, � ' -- � ( � �E --
d� �� �, � 1` y�� l�� �i --_-; ,r..� t y �� -- , � � I� !�
_ ^
� %� � —;� / ��f � i� _. � � L �� ,
� � , �- _ , _�
. � ,_"�iiL.��"`1r 1; __: �C•i�/� �r--�r--�iti'r . � �-, ,. i
i
N 1 ��� ��y' � ��; ��� � � . i\' i.. .,� I r. . � i ir�-----`a ._ �� J� �'
� � �� � � _ � � ' � �I �� �
_ � ,��,�' r � , � ,� -i � � �i�L'�
/
� � ' ._,iE1AI ,� � _ -� •:
(.s; E "'.7�
W1'� _.r-E i i �I ''� � �� T _�I =_�' �
� ��� ��; ; - .._._ p
� 3j S � ' _ �` � :'r ' � F= ..
� '���L��r' ,� � - � '�--,-_ �--�' 3 0
S ; �I "' k � . i�� �. � � f�'
� � - r� � �) �� ��� . �� ���- ` �---I�'.�. - � I _.. y I
�!�I� I'��` �j' �' � i �"�'`� � ��f ' —�+ �
Ny� jl�� .� ,.�">�� � "� �_� �` ��r�i=���:.,..-.� .�� �`� ' �� -�� ��
J �-.� me!!���� `1
y a ��� �_�r � i:' 11 I _
, � �'�� fl .�ly ,,,�'1��.,� arf ,�� �l��� -� i �� ^ � „ � .JE
� �,T��� `������ I �� ��-;el!,_�!I � -',` �{ �I �.,�--.� 'J�L
�,��� � , �_i_ � �,-��
� � � t� E—_�G �� --� �f �,. l+ ,',�'' �
I -_.. w -- � � _��`iu ai� -��t� ����� J!_±I , ` InJ '� _ t �'.L� -i
i , � � _`�—f �� i i�-� �� � i r=-
�; �- � ��,
� Brottl und � � ' � �- � °� _-�r �, ���� I�, �� �, �,�� ,�
Estates f 1 y!`__����!'!,� ��.,^ y i� ;' �' :` JM i' i i�=—`
, ` � ���:�t� �' _�; � � .u_ s,,�^i, 'E b. ���f�__i�-.�-r
L-
� �F� ,�I .� � � 1 � � - b, �� �.r ��
! � —��i I�� � I �• � s�i �^` - _- '�i� �� �+ t
� i 1_Jr Q I L I�� J
y � -�r-t� - �.. � ' � ,�`� ��
� �' ���I � '.� ! ' c� � - !
' ':�' � �I�,� {� -- �:. �� ` � %`T/ �`�"F''� �`� .
7' � F � — —
� - �...�I �� _ - -1' �' �i-__ -c:.�� � �oo �. ;�..,.�✓ 4-- � -..�
i' I � i s; �-'- 'y
-'�.L��.i� �s� - �+-" _ �
o � � ��sa , � .,� .�.. _IT !� t � �I —�� � �::._:� -o
�r ."��/ � 1 JlLi�L ������J 1 ?��I�-k�;�� �,, ' s� r _-`� ,
� i' �-.. -- I ;II t �• ��`�`���L!L �,��� � ,� !1'�C� �i`�i# ;" E
�`. i, �`°; �-��� -' I ,:� il "� L:�i
/1 � 1 ^' �� �Li' � ���iJ� __E__�� ��`�� ,%�� <
_ ��� I � �.:� w� 1J� _ �^-� , _ i ;+�� °� F ��'
� � �"-�y-!�� i -. ' �"�' I
� . � �� - ��� �� -=-� �tl �"S� �. �`-� 1 ���
/ / -I �..,� ,-�Y ., �� �.�,L,,. �� ��_��va�` `a- 1+� ��� I
�
� �:� i . �'_ ,r >�\C � �,�� �Ef_ �.., "� � ��
� �j�- ��� _ - ,
Q �� i,���'J � �' T'� � ����� �-� r - _
� ; �� - _ `I -��' � ,�:�-�� � _ � � ��,t��� ; �C��> c� `
i � � � � -; � � E � i ��- ��'1 =`'�
Z>-_ _ 7 � - f i � , � ��� �— � .._.-� t ��`__=�,•. �'-
� r��� i i i
� ; � T 7 i�l�� � - _ - — _ �
' � t :��� � - - L - _ _- -
� � 4 _ __.
,� zr �t��. � - - -
\ -- I -
� I - , _ _
. ,� -,'� � I _
- :
� �.C,. . — _������'�, _ _ - -'
_ b i '
� � �:��, � �IL� �� � _ :. _ - ,
� �.�'— __ � _ ti ...
N .'k _��Ir ' �"' ' „
� L L
.
.�.....�. N � � -- ': . �^^ � , — � '
.�.., — J+ .. I e I � �. I. ;, _ . .
� � � � ��. � � ' � _ 'i : � _.
' i
\. �V I � _ ' — _.
K PI � �/"_�i _ __ � " I '
, ' ,� � _ _ , _ _ - .
iD� '��1-- - _ __
t I _ _
f �����: i , � - - --- ' � _ -
� --�f , � ; _ _ =- - _ =
, _ �-� :. _- = - -� =
'I / � ;�-_ I ,- -.. __ . . __ _ __ ,
I � � � ! - $TREET MAP-CITY OF -: �� �
' � � --
I ; _ � `, , FRIDLEY _: � ;; j � - _
I.... . ��. —� �._-"'� -. �.� ^���... �c.r .. I ..:.�«
i . <omr. � N....�...,��-�^w � I ��:: _
_ � - �r . 6C �
�
. • ' a :
• � :
� 8nafi.t,eund 1a� Addn.
• . P.S. #77-06 '
������ *.
F F �`
C? _ � �
,
_ . , = �
_ . a
t
.
;
� -
. ; i
M t� /
• t� T�(i *,r Nlff • CiIA�TI/I'v� �A`Sw1A /.w�• �
, � � � J'S�S O/ �>>
•• • N/ 3S �.t !^'inis »�iw R 2 2C }
�- ,� ,i
.��• /1�r •
f.'� (1� ro� �t'. t
`� �r yct (_l ''. ,1,... � �.N . � �
s
� ,ti� • ;, • b`j�- 'i ,�s �w, , +l�,s� . y; ' - --- .. :
� ' I • �� �_ .. _ .� . _ __V � :
1 ', y. �� 'J.S� . . T
' � ♦ .;Y Z'� ',
� u it
,! 'I ' :' •'� ' • •- � ��y� - -.a
�� o
�T *,.. ..� ••.v�a�,qy'� �.
i � � ' TA� �Q�.- ',. �. M/i �"'�'c-'. 'y�s'�•�?.._... .
.:.� )f � C � �r� `�O'
' .+ �„ '
/ ! ;,: . ` y:� ' E' ` ! ✓� /l � '` ,:� �- � ,;
� i w��' J . L��• ��t5�f�f �:3? � l ,.ci� /76S1 � .rr• • � �
�w . �I.•- ��A`r � �^ , . � +=7 � jg��� ��
, i� • V � R� f : � ` ..j � y�t , \�� : ���: ".•���: ��'��\ t.o C 1 � �4..�-- -- t` i%
• ,l` � � �f fJ ;��� y�• s . y _ '�� �' ~ � • f. ' � c Nb _ 6��J � �: � f .... -� ,
. � Zs.t� 5. •i- � �"�r' � r C` '_,� iYS Id...,. .� �1 '_-- '�
. .. � .� � �, � � � , � . � pLp , ;. , ,,t: ,..._ .- �,}� � , `� ., .
� F �v.- L ` ��jV`"� t 4^�' ��, t�•� ,E�,< ,�G. � r - - �
' :�_ �� J �. ` S,Q�? ,,:, b �`�3 , 60.� W � ; , "
� ' ,"� . � � p � {
%� �o ,�o� ��,�SS s • ,a ,.�2� �( "� a7r . _"'�� � �'' +o ,� _ � � x
� �,•• .,r� � v � -`4C M' �I fi �:��'.�♦ ,; 4, �� .i%�'� `�y r• T� '_ _.'_ # . "�
-�P �, � , ' .. .s`.. v, ., � . �---
` �`` / G r • —. .� \� � ',, . � r "�', �` ` `�, ,ry �,,c��'"� �c �' �. > ''-- �i'^� { ;
2 �,�,�,o ,,.: .�� � � � � i —' , c
'; N,` - r� �P y ';;,;,. `��: � t �ae ., � oZO� � i bAS� _ ,� � ��?- �3 ,� � _ � � - - -- i
� i � ,��-.�-'�,�' .�r• � z�" . <Z 'l8�° e ;. , {
.r, s�� � • ' '� , . tbq11 ' ''�� � c ' ' � ��.1. - ' ��,_: r :.a=.: � '` l .- �y _ !
s � �t. �Z�� '� �''
� � ,, b4�� b41�; t�_ - ��;�,�'s'r�, ' �4\ - . � o"� ,�° :,. ~::,P �4'�-3�, Q - ;
` zg Zk, i3 ,;; .:�• b°�! �;����� ��*�� ,� ,eAS°.-_ ���s. -T : �
j I � , X- -1 4� b � y ..�;,.. ,., ���� ' �--��- 1:0 , � , � l a., , -
Q A b � j ► 2 t. �' �� . �. a3o ,� ,� �
� ibAS � �,, �- • 6� \! . ' rFa � s:,.�' - 6b `�� ��� � �
, �
. � ' � + ' � ". y j;Y ^� � 0°, - y ,.
M ,,td'" `` �� �»� 9'�,r? ,�.. � . bq2. �� - _ ;�,,.
e N.4C`����.� `' ' }`ICi�� J 4w •� '�_ •bY` ` P � ` ,�y - -; '� F.
, a � • w�1 � � , 4 ti 4 �.•�'� %' . o�' �. - y - � ._.::..�
' �\� w� • �/SEIf�• � ' f i• '��'� \� ` � "� I1 1 iM I ♦ TS'<, .
�� ��'� j� j� D
i �1��4���:� �� �'T:%�, ' t •���"�5 �i�� E/��' l 2� �� jb j� °- � �, ---
n �� 1��: � 1c� i O' /°� �-40� � c 6 4 T H �i
V�3°• . ^ >-'-_ ��> .� ° `... �° ' .q � ���� �a�°°� - ,� .�: �
� �� `.i1c . j' � r ,r • ,'y l 3 . �
` r '',::'..,C',Y2�! ! ,.�tl� • � � `. , SZ� o .�aS�'.� � f�e .�� /�QF] ��� � . ,
,�. � ^� 3~*L. •�� ' � 't�i' n � Zy���bAiQ w l� :h'�. t _ ��3 �� g// %0� ` S
�•
Q:, OQ t :�. s;� � � '' � ' �r bd�� .�Q. �� � 3.. � �s 7� �. � r.= � � ; , j :
,�, y. - . �+ , � �"- • MJ ON • �o - • •,�, ,�!" r St 3, o-� `► � \q *'R � w � �:•-.r-�" . _ . '
• Y `•i��f � \ 1M- , �- �1. „!; %i M 1 `� ' �:.- , �• _
•� 'L•, w� s�' 4 , • 1 � `� �„' ,: �I � 4x ~ a. 3 ��.."� '`� p�� `� w ib � , •
M , � q � i: ,, «► � � � ��5 � N --. ,., . , , .
1 :� o`.o ��� �, � '� .., ` � � ..s ,u-.ii� � '1� � �B
', �, • r-`+ • • �' �• 5 �A �� _ -.� ,'�'•-- , ,p � ;
�� �2,'` � N�d\ b !�, -• 63�+�\� , � 3 '1 `59 � �� A� d3 ;,. R . f,' � w. ,
' ��' !
� P � �' ��o � 4 4 � �' .�'�,-� � _,�:---- ,! :�A T�,'� '� °� i. ' � G3 i/2 . +
� . . \ a' � �ta 1: �. a '''. .--r�
j � � � 1 / �2 " � � " �; �5� �A4 � 3 ` Z � 1�a W : ,: ' t
� \ � �s�' < �' �'3 , . ti � .� -�1, �6� N '� = ;� _�,,� ^� _ "�� 7 ;;;.�� . , � i
�o� ,
*� +. � �3d � �'i�� � . �� ^�i C`� ,�,` ,� s�,�i�,3 '111,.. � �' .
''� ^- �,
h ` ' w• %� V � w A �,3� w, �
`�"�',��.,i r
� a � • j►�� ` � �R ~ �3=.,-}."'�+'�_ �� � � i� �rJ� `. `�5s +� �FJ �;' l% �Z. �� •
� y ' � t �� '� � �; a �� ey. � � , � � �
' � ' ' 3t� = ; o :i ��5� �� g. �� ► �?� �c.. " p' n �; • ' ;t '
+ �i '' � � � `• {p3�� ,�.a � � d � ` I`l 'S N.E. � , � `• ` • �
, `=� //1 ��. , . � � �.ir r.� _ � _
�:�Y -�, ...� �.
��0 a. v 63 , „ ���,8 �qb 13A 122 �• i10 ��3 f' � ,
� .
° n
� � ' n � r- 1��,1�� �; � �; 3 y �,
Nor�h /%�e ot �he Soutnevs/ .
Brottl und Estates � ,�,or►er o� _ Secr�on . 5___ �'j j�
6431 & 6433 East River Ruad —'T
z
cr�
�
.t,
=
0
�
� , ._ -
a '�
�
o.
�;
�:
:: :-. �
...•� '!'�
.••v ���• � �
G Q�
� , ,.. —• , `�.;� �
F ..,. y ,�.
? ...
� • : .
,. . , Z .
� ` ,y 1
� � � •� W � l
,� ,i• / �I • � w
: ., _ . .: N
.�- . • ..... . •�
f. ._ :--. ''Y,: �_ `','
�... �::.: ; ��
� .»..
�
� �
�
0 3
` i , .
. • a, � _ Q� ,'
` � - �� .
- o �p
� N � nN
� � �,
, NE GO/!►P� ` •
oj Lor // � . •
•''� � • SB9°5G :;O�E ,
' �- '� • Z?. 46: ' . '" .
. � -- - -- -�"-�_- -
_• �
?5�'9 3�+Er ' _ •.1 j ., �, .
h 13 =; .
_ 14g• ..; _� ,, , ;
.- : �:
••; , , ..
... , � ,
. � ' . � �'..., �
:, .- j Q .:;� �.
. • � D .
�� C �
.. o .�
C D
-�� �t'' ;
� ''
... .. . `. 58 `�' ' ' I �.
'� � i � 32"W o, �; •'
.. 51, � 9 � .:.
5 : �, ;: .
�� � . `
�'''�` � -1� `�.;�,.
�r � • tp
1 � ..• �
o - o
� �
. ..�.
�N� _
�N �
.... ':•:.
, �r
�
�`°
' . �•, . -.
... s:
_:.
. ..
/�
�
2
' �88�83_-,�"v►�
,� ..
-
. - •::
� !
YJ (O L• •
� O .. .
� � .� ;
c..y. '
i
..... �
!
t
,
,
,
�
;..
. .
� � �
. ,
_ � �
�1- L ? JO , � •
,ti''cl ° 3 q �.�(' �YV ' . �
TME CITY OF
7 � 1
DIRECTORATE ao
�
- p F °o o°
MEMORANDUM
PU�LlC WORKS � � =
_ _`.'_" -
FRIC�L Y
DATE November 3. 1981
FROM �D.P.W. John G Flora, Publir W�rkc TO ACTION INFO•
SUBJECT
Joint Cooperative Agreement
with Anoka County--CDBG 1982
Anoka County has been design��ted an urban county for 1982 and is there-
fore eligibie for Corrdnunity IJevelopment B7ock Grant Funds. In order for
the County to receive these monies, all cities and municipalities within
the County must agree with t'he County administering these funds. Last
year, we executed the Joint Coop Agreemenfi and received $280,000 in CDBG
funds.
Recommend the City Council authorize the Joint Cooperative Agreement with
Anoka County for the CDBG 1982 Program.
JGF:ijk
0
ro�� C�Uhr
P F
<►
~�NNE50
lA
Ca U N TY OF ANOKA �
Office of �he Countr Board ojCommrssioners
COURTMOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760
October 29, 1981
The lionorable William J. Nee
Mayor, City of fridiey
219 Logan Parkway N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Dear hiayor Nee:
I am writin� to reouest that you give irr,iediate attention to the attached
Joint Cooneraiion Agreement v►�hich pertains to the County's d�signation
as an "Urban County" under the Commun9ty Development Block Grant Prooram.
According to NUD guidelines, it is im�+erative that Anoka County receive
a copy of the Joint Cooperatlon Acreement prior to �yove��er 13, 1981.
6ecause of special legislation, Rnoka County aa,ain has the ot?portunity
to parti ci pate i n the Cor��r�un i ty Gev21 oGr�ent B1 ock �rant Progran on
behalf of all of its municipzlities and to���r►ships for fiscal year i982.
It is anticinated that this progra�� Ylould mean anproximately Q2 million
of ne►v Federal r�oney i n AnoN,a Caunty.
Nineteen cor-�unities elected to subr�it proiect activities ta Anoka
County in the fiscal 1981 Anoka County Conr�unity Dev�lop�nent Block Grant
Program. The entire Count.y has benefited by the funding of the 26
cor�nunity projects and the� County-wide housing rehabilitation effort.
The attached agreement rep�resents only the enabling st�p for the County's
a�plicatiort. Througi� the activities of the Tech��ica] Advisory Ccr���ittee
and the assistance of Coun�ty staff, the cities an� tc���nshias vrfll dev2lop
their projects to be submitted to the County Board for review and approval.
The County Board is please�d to have had the o�p�rtunity to parttcipate
with the cities and to�,��nsh�ips in the Co�nunity �evelonment Block rrant
Program for fiscal year 19�81 and looks forward to continued cooperation
in the 1982 Program.
Affirmative A�:tion / Equal Opportunity Employer
October 29, 1981
Page Two.
Again, let me remind you 1:hat this agreement must be signed pxior to
November 13, 19�1 by all i:he municipalities and townships in Anoka
= County 1n order for us to participate in the program. If you should
have any questions at all with regard to the passage of this Jo1nt
Cooperation Agreement, pl�ase do not hesitate to contact me.
With personal regards, I am,
TY:sm
Enclosure
cc: Nasim Qureshi " '
Sincerely,
Tim Yantos
Administrative Assistant
��
.� • JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT 7 C
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the
COUNTY OF ANOICA, State of Minnesotn, hereinafter referred to
and the CITY/TO�N �F '
3E �COUNTY�i •
hereinnfter referred to as "MLINZCIPALITY"r said parties to
- this Agreea�ent each beinq governmental units of Ehe State of
Minnesota, and is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, ;
Sectioa 471..59.
W I T N E S S E T 8:
" {aIiEREt►S, Title I of the Housing and Community development
Act of 1974, as amended, provides for a program of community
development: block grants; �d.
WHERE�,S, P+aoka County, Minnesota qualifies under said
law as an "urban county" eligible to receive community
developmen* block grant funds; and,
WHEgEp,.S, the County's population, among other factors,
is a detenninant of the eligibility of the County and the
amount of :cesources which may be made available to the
County to �undertake activities under the afore-referenced
law; and.
W��,�S, gart 570, Chaptez V of Title 24 of the Code of�
Federal regulations sets forth regulations governing the
applicability and use of funds under Title I; and,
WHEREAS, Section 570.105. titled "qualifications as
urban county." provides that computation of the County's
population may include pezsons residinq in "unincorporated
areas" and ia "its included parts of general local government
with which. it has entered into cooperative agreements to '
undertake or to assist in the undertaking of essential
activities� pursuant to community development block�grants;"
and,
WHERE:AS, it is in the intezest of the City/Town of
Fridley to have its population
counted tngether with other municipalities of Anoka CountY
who similarly agree;
7D
• • NpW, THE1tE:FORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually
aqree to the following terms and conditions.
I. DEFINITIONS
For the p�lrpoees of this Aqreement, the tezzas defined
- in this sectio�z have the meanings given to them:- ��
A. ��e Act" means the Housing and CommnnitY D°�'elopment
Act of 1974, Title I, of Public Law 93-383, as amende.
USC 5301 et seg_) •
� g. "Rec�ulations" means the rules and regulatioas
promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not limited
to 24 CFR Parr 570.
C, "HLJ1D" means the United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development-
D, "Coopezating Community" means any city or -- '=
p,noka County which has entered into a cooperation agreemen:
which is ider►ticnl to this Agreement. �
The regulationa contained in 42 USC 5302 of the Act and
24 CFR 570.3 of the Regulations are incorporated herein by
reference and made a part hereof.
II, pURPOSE
Municip�ality and County have determined that it is
desirable ar►d in the interests of its citizens that the
County quali�fies as an urban county within the provisions of
the Act. Tliis Agreement contemplates that identical agreements
will be exe�cuted between the County and other cities and
towns in Anoka County and such numbers will enable the
County to so qualify under the Act. ,
The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize the
County to c:ooperate with the Municipality in undertaking, o=
assist in undertaking, essential community renewal and lower
income hou:sing assistance activities, specifically urban
renewal and publicly assisted housing pursuant to community
development block grants as �uthorized in the Act and the
Regulation,s.
-2-
7E
' III. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The term of this Agreement is for a period commencing
on the effective day of October 1, 1961, and terminating no
sooner than the: end of the third program year covered by the
application foi: the basic grar►t amount approved subsequent
to the effe�tive date. This Agreement is extended auto- �,
matically for Nach subsequent three-year program period
unless written notice of termination to be effective at the
end of the current thzee year program Pe=iod is given by
Municipality to County followinq the same schedule as the
_i
"opt out" noti.fication requirements as established by HUD.
The County shxll provide written notification to Munici-
pality of Mun��cipality's right to "opt out" and terminate
this Agreemeni� at least thirty t30) days prior to the "opt
out" date.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
this Agreement shall be terminated at the end of any program
year during w�hich IiUD withdraws its designation of Anoka
County as an Urban County under the Act.
This Ag�:eement shall be executed by the appropriate
officers of Municipality and County pursuant to authority
granted them by their respective governing bodies, and a
copy of the authorizing resolution and executed Agreement
shall be filed promptly by the Municipality in the office of
the Anoka County Administrator, and in no event shall the
Agreement be: filed later than October 31, 1981.
Iy, METHOD
The Municipality and County hereby agree that they will
coopezate t�� undertake or assist in undertaking, community
renewal and lower income housing assistance activities,
specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing.
The County shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropziate
reviewing a�gencies, all necessary applications for a basic
grant amount under the Act. In making the application, the
-3-
7F
�.
� Couaty sha11 address the goals and needs of County as developed
in meeting� between the Municipnlity, its citizens and the
County, and al�o addressing the Act and other relevant
Minnesota �sad/oz Federal statutes or regulations. The
parties ag:cee to cooperate fully in establishing_priorities
and in prel?aration of the application for a basic grant �
amount. Mu�nicipality and County agree that the County shall �
establish +d reasonable time schedule for the development of ,
the grant ,spplication.
It is anticipate8 by the parties that the party ultimately
i,mplementi�nq a project funded by monies received from the
grant may lbe either the Municipality or the County. The
determinat:ion of which party will implement the project will
be made by the parties after consideration of the nature and
scope of t:he project, and the ability of each party to
undertake �the project. thouqh it is understood by the Municipality
that the C��unty shall have #inal responsibility for selecting
projects a:nd filinq annual grant requests. The County is
hereby aut:horized to distribute to the Municipality such
funds as a.re determined appropriate for the Municipality to
use in implementinq a project and the County is hereby
authorized to undertake projects within the Municipality as
are determined appropriate for the County to undertake.
Contracts let and purchases made pursuant to a project under
this Agree:ment shall conform to the requirements applicable
to the entity ur�dertaking the project.
V. SPECIAI, PROVISIONS
13othi:ng in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent
or otherwise modify or abroqate the ri9ht of Municipality�or
County to submit individual applications for discretionary
funds in the event County does not receive designation as an
urban county entity under the act.
Municipality and County mutually agree to indemnify and
hold harmless each other from any claims, losses, costs,
expenses o.r damages resulting from the acts or omissions of
their respective officers, agents and employees relating to
activities conducted by either under this Agreement, the
-4-
. ,
�
gbrogate County's responsibility to assume all obligations
of an applic:ant under the Act, including the development of
applicationr� pursuant to 24 CFR 570.300 et se .
All prc>qram income from activities funded ia total or
part from tiie basic grant amouat received by Municipality
shall be he:ld by County in a non-interest bearing account
designated :Eor Municipality.
IN WITJNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement
to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered
on its behalf thia day of . 1981.
Upon proper execution this
agreement w�ill be leqally
valid and t�indinq.
7G
COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA
By: ..
Chairman o its County Board
Assistant C;ounty Attorney �d• ,.....
Date: County Administrator
APPROVED A'a TO EXECUTION:
CITY/TOWN OF FRIDLEY:
Assistant County Attorney
Date:
CITY MUST CHECR ONE:
The City is organized
pursuant t.o:
Plan A Pl.an B Chartere'� �
By : .
WILLIAM J. NEE
Its : Ma or
-6-
And:
, QURESHI
Its : Ci ty �4anager
0
�
TME CITV OF
FRIt�L . Y
IDATE
FROM "D.P,W.
SUBJECT
DlRECTORATE
OF
puB��c woR�cs �
�
Change Order No. 1
Water & Sewer Project No. 134
..
.�.
. •
l�
J
M EMO R A N D UM
The Fire Department identi•Fied a section of East University Service
Drive between 57? Avenue and 60th Avenue, which did not have a fire
hydrant to service this corrmercial area. We are able ta amend our
existing Water and Sewer P�^oject No. 134 to extend a water line and
install a fire hydrant on East University Service Drive midway be-
tween 572 and 60th Avenues,. This work is estimated at $4,500.
_�
ACTIONI iNFO•
Since this improvement wil'� provide better fire protection to this com-
mercial area, recommend the City Council approve Change Order No. 1
to Water and Sewer Project No. 134.
In addition to the fire hycirant installation, the asphalt driveway of
the Mr. Steak parking lot required replacement due to the construction.
A purchase order (#20777) was initiated for this repair work. We have
discussed this cost with tFie owners of Mr. Steak indicating they would
be responsible for the replacement of the asphalt and curbing which is
located in our right-of-way�.
JGF:ijk
�
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Enqineering Division
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Fridley, Minnesota
October 21, 1981
Bonine Excavating, Incorporated
12636 Main Street Northeast
Rogers, Minnesota 55374
Subject: Change Order No. 1, Sewer and Water Project No. 134
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, aut:horized and instructed to modify your con-
tract for Sewer and Water F�roject No. 134 by adding the following
work:
ADDITION
Watermain extension on University Avenue East Service Drive south of
61st Avenue
ITEM APPROX.�UANT. UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
6" Ductile Iron Pipe
6" x 6" x 6" Tee
b" Hydrant w/Valve
6" Gate Valve
45° Bend
Wet Tap
155 Lin. Ft. $ 9.89 $1,532.95
1 Each 793.80 793.80
1 Each 1,440.10 1,440.10
1 Each 312.59 312.59
1 Each �$•�5 �8•�5
1 Each 300.00 300.00
Total Change Order No. 1•••$4,458.19
Original Contr,act Price . . . . . . . . . . . . . �61,674.79
Change Order #1 (Sewer & Water Project #134) . . . 4,458.19
REVISED CONTRACT PRICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $66,132.98
. �
�
Page two
Letter to: Bonine Excavat�ing, Inc.
Change Order No. 1: Sewer & Water Project #134
October 21, 1981
Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director on the
21st day of October 1981.
, �%
Prepared \ ��. -r% /'
�
Checked by ��i�u�
/ �
�� /
' ____���
G. FLORA, P.E.
F��1 i c Works Di rector
Approved and accepted this � day of �f , 1981 by Bonine
Excavating, Inc.
BONINE EXCAVATING, INC.
� _�-�u�-
By Title
Approved and accepted this day of , 1981 by the City
Council of Fridley, Minnes�ota
WILLIAM J. NEE Mayor
NASIM M. QURESHI City Manager
. .
�
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
TO A PROPOSED II�fDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
BY LA MAUR INC. UNDER THE MUNICIPAL -
INDUSTRIAL DEVE:LOPMENT ACT AND AUTHORIZING :
_= SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE
COMMISSIONER OF ��ECURITIES FOR APPROVAL THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED Yry the City Council of the City of
Fridley, Minnesota, as fo].lows:
1. There has been presented to this Council a pro-
posal by LaMaur Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Company")
that the City undertake and finance a project pursuant to the
Minnesota Municipal Indusl:rial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 474 (the "Act") ge�nerally consisting of acquiring, construct-
ing, equipping and expand��ng of the Company�s existing manufacturing
building (the "Project"j. Under the proposaZ, the Project facilities
will be owned by the Comp�iny, and the Company will enter into a
revenue agreement with thE� City upon such terms and conditions as
are necessary to produce ��ncome and revenues sufficient to pay
when due the principal of and the interest on up to approximately
$3,000,000 Industrial Development Revenue Bonds of the City to be
issued pursuant to the Act, to provide monies for the acquisition,
construction, expansion and installation of the Project; and the
City will pledge its inte�:est in the revenue agreement to secure
the bonds.
2. As requireci by the Act, this Council conducted a
public hearing on , 1981 on the proposal to
undertake and finance the Pro�ect after publication in the official
newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation in the City of a
notice setting forth the time and place of hearing; stating the
general nature of the Pro;ject and an estimate of the principal
amount of bonds or other ��bligations to be issued to finance the
Project; stating that a d:raft copy of the proposed Application to
the Commissioner of Securities, toqether with all attachments and
exhibits thereto, is available for public inspection at the
office of the City Clerk, in the City Hall, at all times between
the hours of A.M. and P.M. each day except Saturdays,
Sundays and holidays to a:nd including the day of hearing; and
stating that all parties �who appear at the public hearing shall
have an opportunity to ex;press their views with respect to the
proposal. The draft application to the Commissioner of Securi-
ties, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, was on
file and available for pu'blic inspection at the place and times
set forth in the notice.
3. It is hereby found, determined and declared that.
the Project furthers the purposes stated in Section 474.01 of
the Act in that the purpose of the Project is and the effect
thereof will be to promote the public welfare by the attraction,
encouragement and development of economically sound industry and
commerce so as to prevent, so far as possible, the emergence of
-3-
0
blighted and marginal lancis and areas of chronic unemployment;
the retention and developrnent of industry to use the available
resources of the communit;t, in order to retain the benefit of its
existing investment in educational and public service-facilities;
by halting the movement o]E talented, educated personnel of mature
age to other areas and thus preserving the economic and human
resources needed as a basE� for providing governmental services
and facilities; and the mnre intensive development of land avail-
able in the area to provicie a more adequate tax base to finance
the cost of governmental s�ervices in the Municipality, county and
school district where the Project is located.
4. The Company has entered into preliminary discussions
with Piper Jaffray & Hopwnod Incorporated, as Underwriter, and
the Underwriter has repori:ed that the Project and the sale of
bonds therefor are feasib�Le.
5. The Company has agreed to pay any and all costs
incurred by the City in connection with the Project whether or
not the Project is approvE:d by the Commissioner of Securities and
whether or not the Projeci: is carried to completion.
6. The Project is hereby given preliminary approval by
the City subject to appro��al of the Project by the Commissioner
of Securities and subject to final approval by this Council and
by the purchasers of any bonds to be issued as to the ultimate
details of the Project anci as to the terms of the bonds.
7. In accordanc:e with Section 474.01, Subd. 7 of the
Act, the Mayor, the City C:lerk, and such other officers and
representatives of the Cii:y as may from time to time be designated
are hereby authorized and directed to submit the proposal for the
Project to the CommissionE�r of Securities and request her approval
thereof, and the Mayor, the City Manager, the City Clerk, and
other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby
authorized to provide the Commissioner with such preliminary
information as she may require. The Company, Messrs. Faegre &
Benson as bond counsel, tYie City Manager, the City Clerk, the
City Attorney, and other (:ity officials are also authorized to
initiate the preparation nf a proposed loan agreement and such
other documents as may be necessary or appropriate to the Project
so that, when and if the proposed Project is approved by the
Commissioner and this Council gives its final approval thereto,
the Project may be carrieci forward expeditiously.
8. The Company is hereby authorized to enter into such
contracts, in its own name� and not as agent for the City, as may
be nec�ssary for the consi�ruction of the Project by any means
available to it and in thE� manner it determines without advertise-
ment for bids as may be re�quired for the acquisition or construc-
tion of other municipal f��cilities, but the City shall not be
liable on any such contrac:ts.
-4-
9A
�o�x r�. - �� ^
� ati-�, � � • • •�:�• : r�f �� • r• • ►� • a+ � � �.�.
•,� �i r r•• •�; r. :i• �:�r.
Nt7W, 7�iF�2EFORE, BE IT RF50LVID, that in consideration of the conveyance by
Marquette State Bank of Columbia Heights, to the City of Fridley of a 15
foot bikeway-waZkway easemEnt described as follows:
The southerly 15 feet: of Lot 2, Block 1, East Ranch Estates
Third Addition.
All lying in Section 1.1, Tawnship 30, Range 24, City of FridZey,
County of Anoka, State� of Minnesota.
T'he City of Fridley agrees as follaas:
1. That it will at all times hereaf ter, at its own cost and expense,
repair and maintain in a pi-oper and workmanlike manner the above-described
bik�way and walkway;
2. Except for claims arising out of acts caused by the affirmative
negligence of the fee owne�- or its representatives, the City of Fridley
sha].1 inde�nnify and defend the fee owner, at the cost and expense of the
City of Fridley, against a:Ll liabilities, penalties, damages, expenses,
including reasonable attorneys' fees, and judgments, by reason of any
injury or claim of injury Ko person or property, of any nature, arising
out of use, occupation, and control of the bikeway-walkway to be
constructed and laid out w:ithin the boundaries of said easement.
PASSID AND ADOPTID BY �iE ��ITY O�UNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
LIAY OF , 1981.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
AZTF�T:
SIDNEY C. INM11N - CITY CLE,RR
10
._ .� I � � ±� 10 A
, .� .. • . � '
� N GVRNER � � '; . i ;
_ � Ee. it . — — � _ pZ'.,� � ' ----
,
. �� / ' � O
4L!.sT 5 �� �
. =�.f► —�
,...... IJ B9 59�3o'E er.si �
��:. . '�!�}196}:�fi�-•� Ay _ � . ..i�i.st ' fr.....•-
.... ' fX�b!
.." '.. a Y- . ' . . . . . . .
It.T +s. n v..�. � .
i r `t � . , • .to7 " � r°.ii+.«r ^%i•ss r^+ k �+ ' /OO �+! ;
---, _ �;.�y , �,�. ,�; �...E . „ EAS�. RA�1/�- � �,j �; : . . �n_ : �
� , •,o ,� . , .
, �'"'�'AST � ,, RANCH ESr� TES ' ��.� ,''' � . ' " :
♦' � ,� �, ; ' v
.� o , . . .
Tn ..�+ � �• ' �, � .
. �. �= � �:, 3-' ES'TA ES 4 3 � ti : FlRST �r,� , �..� o• � :� , .
/ . V •�;/A O�rl �i:: � �
� �' � A DD ' � • �`'• �'` e ' �' ° � j�
. { ' ,� TH D ADD/T/0 :;, � ��` � • �J '`�yv' �� N �.t I f F
�. : ; �.
q� _ , , . E. j : ,. _s..
�t `ti �=a,.e, � s �,,,
�r .,. � �-�► � . ..,r., ��" � a �;�w :'. � _ �� ►.-
' s� � ; , ,. r.ac ? s� � � . �; . f j.
. . LJ' `�r � � \ . , .1. . I � _ : � �/�l � �N ��-�• �
-A i/ r , r ` �l�r '• �
V-� .`� � ' I '� � � ...�� ' I r; � • , Z j 1
�• •'•'Y °' .:1 9.l� � � � - —�20f
� '� 2: �1 � � � , �
t! ". � ' %A.:�,, � ��C' :�. M•µ'� /�Mf'�'� i ' I' �
o ..-� , �• w .a�� ( 4
. _ ,�:� t g'..... '�-' �; �. .��n�1 R,n+y ' ----�f'c�'tt••:...
R � � N � ,1C�' ��j- i � � �' � JY p.....' jyl :
7� � / � t f �� � �
(�/�J :. L 3 1.jD s9Z� '� «e.. "- : m �e
..� � ;� ._ �� ° _ l . H� E— _-+_ a_ � _�
. . ' �fo �:.r.n � �n � �i. : � �
. ? �r. �. 't �v .: �1
� � ``�%' • �='`� �R ^ 9 ti` � �+ •• �io) '� ,�,� --�.r
. �, j � " � i�a - .. � , .
`� t0 a�� ' a ,�j • �/500) '� 5 :(,n `.
t et , ° �j N � ��' � 3" N�° , ,;- � � �i
� �e = �", :, �.i3/J N3� ";,'�, � � : ti
��'r. / .��` . a ,�s��►.ir' , rt.., i � Y'• ` •�l:
,, .�"� y ` ` - / % � ' � k
��,1' �,�... � C/�.r�, � C.'�C� � �4���`" :Z
I � %� �' � p 2f7!! � ' �
q. �';�'i p� N /�rp:�r•, #:Nk'��1 M
. . II ', �.i � �1 ` 1 �, ., � _„ ,, .';��'�; ; '; �R, 1� r
o �_
� ` V
' I � M
� S �� '� �A �� Q �a .�r
s I ��� � (,� �t w ....._......_..,1 � � ;iir•�avvy'------�- o ---,yi+;, �-r•...Y_..� , i
z �, %.���� a : ; .
/, �, ,� ; i•ir�r,� o ,� �� ;
� ;. o s
. , , � .'
y 2 p 253 � : �
i ,
� � , N`, w' 7 N 4 ���0� +�p � t
�
� �!R . .� � p �
� �,� p.� �., }
�
,,.a ' r�a �irf�i
i•:i' •, .• ,r �r- t��M . a t� HI � 1 � � • i
� � r +/ r11 i � � {�
{y ,��,��� �• � ,
��j� t �'�' M j iI�1�� q l� 1
, �r �a � �� � � r
� ►�'!1� ,'�i .4t�t! ���i
�} � �`� � � �k11k_i1 � r ; ��� �y:. , �° �
I. �'d ��
, �+ � � �
4,] I� i ���l���� � M �.�i+�� ,
, �
� M � ('��I��'f�� �h 1� � i
��:��,� ��, y`�f�i, � l��:.�e
y ':';i`;+ h 4� �,.
�'
�.� R� ��► �i � ���
� f�� � ��<< ��� ,�����f�" (��;
#� j
�t,1 r,,.tl . M � ►� tJ�
l� � ��'e��{� r���jii � ,
� !r
_ �y � �� ` � ��'� �
�,: � ,.,, � y �
• ti� . � ks 1� � Jt/��1{��% �....r �.,A(,�
i fd �i�j � I
� , �.,
�I � i�Ml!�� �i � I
IM E �
r,, , t'r!'•r ,_ ..� . , 1.�R�. '
. � . . .. . ���� . _.. �..�.:,.•.�, ► l�tl . _ s!:_ . . . .. i Y
� � a.�'A�
a,� (��,�a� � /J � � . ,� , '�
� ,
� u . o .' . L Q;3. �n �, �
, �a ZZ , , �
. . . " o C�-o o) o
i ` � � �4 g �
?G/2H 26.so6 ,
�23��� � .: . ., ' • w ' K (750� "� �
•ssur�e���- �_ .._. .._.�. , A .�...�:� ;x�� ...,:..: r...�....1: _�:.. ! _ . . _._/.r..........,....._2 ...,. ��...�..._..
L�M' OFFICES OF 10 P
LEVITT. PALMEIl2, BOWEN, ROTMAN 8c SHARE
500 ROANOHE H'UILDINO
MINNEAPOLIS, MIlv'NES01'd 55402
�ssxrs�vc a. s.avan
JOHN M. PALMER
ROHEIii' 1[, HOWLN
JERRY,�1', ROTM�N
ROHE�' �. SHARE
STEPH£N WINNICS
JO8N TROYER
J. PASRICB Mc DrVITT
J08L H. CiOT?ESM�N
2i�T1'ilEW L. LEVITT
JAME3 E. NELSON
JOSEPH P. NOACIC
CJI'liER1NE ROY TiilTCHER
Mr. Clyde Moriarity
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, MN 55421
�REJ CODE g12
3:i9 -0661
July 10, 1980
Re: Marquette State Bank of Columbia Heights -
Bikeway-Walkway Easement
Dear Mr. Moriarity:
E
In accordance with John Troyer's letter of June 13,
1980 to Mr. Brunsell, we are enclosing herewith a photocopy
of a revised quitclaim deed which has been sent to Marquette
State Bank of Columbia Heights for the appropriate signatures.
We are also enclosing herewith a draft of a Resolution which
we propose be given to Marquette State Bank of Columbia
Heights by the City.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the
enclosures, please feel free to call the undersigned or
John Troyer.
Ver truly yours
�
J S E. NELSON
JEN:dg
Enclosures
cc: William A. Laing
Y�� cri. o..�• Form No. 31-M. r�cu��-n,.;, c�., r�;���,� �O (`
Grqntin b GeNr�ll�a Minnc:o�a Unilunn Con._��y+i c.in•s Bl�nk. (Rcv6cd 1 \i
�___— _ ..
_. _ _ ..' .' _ _ .�' ___—._ —..—__^____.'__ . _' —_— _ ' '
��ji� 3fna�nture, �r� thu ...................__....._................... aQy of..........No�emher...................., 1s...B1.,
b�tween .................Ma.r..Au.e.L.L,�...S.ta.t:e...Bank...p.f....CnJLmha.a...He.i.ghts.............................__.................................._........................
� a corporation under ,the lstiu� of the State of......._.........M.1DJ.IESO.Ld........._.._ ....................r Pw'tdl of the first part, and
. . ............._.....____._......._............_..............__..C.i..ty....af....Er.i.dl.ey. ......_.................._...._............................................_..........
i+hm��pa�.�......_. .
a aorpora ion u.nder �Ehe 7aw� of the Sta,Le o� ...................M3l1i125.Qt3................__....__..__-....__..........................._.....................,
, party of Ehe +eoond part, -
' L�itnrgsetfj, ThaE the iaid party o� thc }frst pa.rt, in oonsidtration of Eke sum of
.Ane...dnJ..l.ar.....(S1.D!21...nn�d...a.ther....va.l.uabl.e..cnnsi.der.ai.inn-----------.-.-----.------ DOLL.9XS,
to il in kand paid by the iad party o� tlu �econd pert, tTu recr.i.pt u�lurtof u htreby acknou•1ed�rd,
doee h�reby Crant, 6'argain, Quttclaim, and Conrrey unto tTu eaid party o� tlu �econd pa.rt, ita rucceaavrs
� and a+aiQns, Forevtr, att dhe traot..........or pa,rcet......... o� land tyinj and bein� in Lhc Count& o/ ......................_
........................MOk7l.................................and Sta.tt of dfinnuota. deaeribed ai foZlows, to-unt:
A 15 foot bikeway/walkway easement described as follows:
The southearly 15 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, East Ranch Estates Third
Addition.
All lying in Sectio� 11, Township 30, Range 24, Lity of Fridley,
County of Anoka, State of Minnesota
Said bikeaiay/watkway easement is to be laid out so it does not inter-
fere with ingress or egress to the subject property by the fee owner.
The City o�f Fridley hereby accepts this easement for bikeway/walkway
purposes.
SIDNE C. INMAN City Clerk
NO STATE DEED TAX REQUIRED
�o �abe anD to �uID tije �ame, Togefhts utith a11 tIu hertditamtnta and appurEenancea tlura
urtto belonQin� or in anyu�iwe ¢pperlaininQ, to t1u �aid party of tht �econd part, ita ruccesaor� and aaeiQni,
For�ver.
�Jn �rs'timonp d�bcreof, Tlu ,a�,d h�t �rty haa cauaed thua
prwents to br e.�ecu.ted in ita corpor¢te reams by iG .............................._._
Preaident and ita.......II.]..CP...P..CES1�Pp.t.........and ita corpurate nal fo
be Tureunto af�a•ed tTu day and ytar fird aboc•e writtcn.
MARQUETTE..STATE..BANK..OF COLUMBIA.HEIGHTS...
ay ...................... .....
WT�C C�Ti41�..q.�... LA�ING ................._...
It�t ....................................Prtaident
...
......................M�....L.�....G�OT��W��C�S......_....�.. _..__
Itr....� i.ce...Pr.es. i.denL..._...
�
�
RESOLU'TION N0. - 1981
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZIIVG TRANSFERS FROM THE PUBLIC UTILITY
FUND AND THE REVOLVING FUND TO W-75 WATER WORKS IMPROVEMENT
BOND FUND AND WATER REI�UNDING BONDS OF 1975 FUND
WHEREAS, Tax levies have been ad��pted and filed with the County, or transfers
into bond funds are necessary to provide the required amount of money in
certain improvement bond funds,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, IBy the City Council of the City of Fridley,
meetinq at a regular session on �the 9th day of November as follows:
1. That a transfer from the Public Utility Operating Fund to the
Water Refunding Bond Fund W-75 in the amount of $56,535 for the
purpose of eliminating the tax levy for the year 1981,
collectible in the ;year 1982, is authorized.
2. That a transfer from the Public Utility Operating Fund to the
Water Refunding Bornds of 1975 Fund in the amount of $20,478 for
the purpose of eliminating the tax levy for the year 1981,
collectible in the ;year 1982, is authorized.
3. That a transfer of the 1981 collections from Service Connections
by the Special Assessment Revolving Fund (80) to the Water
Refunding Bonds of 1975 for the purpose of eliminating the tax
levy for the year 1981, collectible in the year 1982, is authorized.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY C�OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
OF , 1981.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK - SIDNEY C. INMAN
11
�
PURPOSE
11 A
FOR MEETING DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT FUNDS FOR THE YEAR 1981
TO BE TRANS-
AVAILABLE FROM FERRED FROM
SERVICE CONNEC- RUBLIC UTILITY
FUND REQUIREMENTS TIONS IN 1981 FUND TAX LEVY
W-75 (Water
Refunding)
Water Refunding
Bonds of 1975
$ 56,535
28,838
$ 85,373
�o be paid by Utility Fund
$
8,360
$ 8,360
$ 56,535
20,478
$ 77,013
Not
Scheduled
$ 77,013
To be paid by Service Connections 8,360
$ 77,013
CONSIDERATION OF 1982 HOLIDAY AP�D CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDU.LES
1982
S M T W T F 5
- J UNRY �c y
� 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 26 27 28 29 30
31
fE UARY
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 9 10 11 12 13
14 16 11 18 19
21 2 23 24 25 26 27
NA> l. �9u�_
IS M T W T F S
JULY
I 1 2 3
4 6 7 8 9 10
11 1 13 14 l5 16 17
18 20 2l 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 :t9 30 31
^ UST
1 2 3 4 5 5 T
8 30 11 :l2 13 14
15 17 18 R9 TO 21
22 24 25 ;.>6 27 28
29 31
MARCH w�s�. v� �p7EMBER
2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4
7 8 10i11213 S 7 S!3 1011
14 16 11 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
21 23 24 25 26 27 19 21 22 23 24 25
28 30 31 26 27 28 Z9 30
^��� OBER 1 2
4 S 6 7 8 9 0 0; 1 1�,4 S 6�,R
1 1 1 3 1� 1 5 1 6 1 7 ����` 2 2 2 3f��us.
18 1 20 21 22 23 24 24 S 26 27 2�6 29 30 �Y
25 21 28 29 30 31
M Y 1 NOVEMBER
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 3�• 5 6
9 il l2 13 14 15 7 8 9 10 `� 12 13
16 11 18 19 20 21 22 14 16 17 18 19
� 25 26 2) 28 29 21 2 2�� 27,
_�
JUNE DECEMBER
1 2 3 4 5 l 2 3 4
6 7 8_9 10 1�12 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
�. t F`� —'' 13 4 5 16 17 18_ 19 12 14 15 16� 17 18
Roeh es r� t 20 2 22 3�d 25 26 19 20 21 22 23 � 25
27 29 30 26 28 29 30
'� t
An
i9)
i2)
= Holidays (11)
Jan. 1 New Years Day
Feb. 15 Presidents' Day
May 31 Memorial�Day
July 5 4th of July (Sun�
Sept. 6 Labor Day
Oct. 11 Columbus Day
Nov. 11 Vet. Day
Nov. 25 Thanksgiving
Dec. 24 Christmas (25-Sat)
�
Nov. 26 Day after Thanksgiving
Dec. 31 January 1, 1983 falls on
Saturday, so �riday,
December 31 will be the
day off
(11 Days Tota1)
X = Hol iday�� (11)
� = Council Meetings (24)*
� = Conference ��eetings (5)**
* Council Meetings will be held the first and third Monday of each month
except for the months of February and October when they will be held
the first and fourth P4onday, and the months of March, July, September
and Idovember when they will be he1d the second and fourth ��londay.
** Conference meetings will be held the fourth Monday of January, N1ay,
Jnne, August and the f'ifth Monday of htarch.
11/9/81
j.-,�
�:; .
�\) i'.�1; CONCU�R���CE °Y TH� C{TY COUNClL _ APPOINTt�1ENTS
.. �_._. November 9, 1981
NA�4E
John Benedict Cich
4146 Meadow Brook La.
St. Louis Park, MN
55416
David Norman Prois
1959 Forest St.
Hastings, MN 55033
POSITION SALARY
Police Oi�ficer $1348
Pol ice De�pt. per
Month
Pol i ce Of`f i cer $1348
Police DE�pt. per
Month
n
EFFECTIVE
DATE
12-14-81
REPLACES
James Bankston
11-23-81 David Younkin
13
�ja 14
� F.OR CONCURRENCE: 8Y THE CITY COUNClL - LICE'�SES
November 9, 1981
r
T�pe of License: B,� Approved By: Fees:
Food Establishment
Big B's Rizza
317 Osborne Rd. N.E.
Fridley, Mn. 55432
On Sale Beer
Robert L. Johnson
Steven J. Olson -
Health Inspector
Big B's Pizza Robert L. Johnson James P. Hill
317 Osborne Rd. N.E. Public Safety Director
Fridley, Mn. 55432
Packaged Food Establishment
�•lidwest Antique Inc. Charles W. Weinberger Steven J.Olson
967 Payne Ave. ' Health Inspector
St.Paul, �1n.
$35.00
$189.63
$35.00
Do 14 A
� F.OR CONCURRENCE 9Y THE CITY C4UNCIL - LICENSES
NOV.EMBER 9, 1981
GIIVERAL CC[�1TRACTOR
Condor Corporation
'819 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
St. Paul, MN 55118
Construction 70, Inc.
1430 W. County Road C
St. Paul, Na7 55113
Gillespie Construction
23181 Zypo Creek Drive
Stacy, MN 55079
Hearth & Home Co.
1525 47est River Road N.
Minneapolis, MN 55411
By : it�ger Riley
By: William Sievers
By : ;Terry Gi llespi e
By: i:evin �asserly
Northwes tern Builders
8053 East Bloomington Freeway
Bloomington, MN 55420 By: P4ark Reynolds
Pro Construction, Inc.
4805 Dominick Road
Minnetonka, MI1 55343 By: l2andy Anderson
Star Contractors/Starbridge Corp.
6960 Madison Avenue West
Golden Valley, MN 55427 By: Robert J. Ritter
Viking Home Improvement Co.
4832 - 2� Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55421 By: I�loyd Merrell
HEATING
Albers Sheet Metal & Vent., Inc.
200 West Plato Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55107 By: �Tann Peyer
APPRWED BY
DA$R�L CLARK
Chzef Bldg. Ofc.
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldg. Ofc.
DARREL CLARI:
Chief Bldg. Ofc.
DARFiEL CLARK
Chief Bldg. Ofc.
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldg. Ofc.
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldg. Ofc.
DARE2EL CLARK
Chief Bldg. Ofc.
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldg. Ofc.
tiVILLIAM Ii. SANDIN
Plbg. iitg. Insp.
Do . � 1�E �
" 1� F.OR CONCURRENCE SY THE CITY COUNCIL — LICENSES
� ` November 9, 1981 Residental Rental Property
�,..
OWNER LOCATION OF BLDG. UNITS FEE APPROVEO BY
Gordon S. Graham � 5334 - 4th St. NE 1 $12.00 Steven J. Olson,
5334 - 4ttt St. NE Environ.Ofcr.
Fridley, MN 55421
Mary Hanson 7851-55 Fin+�ood Way NE 1 12.00 Steven J. Olson,
7851 Firwood Way NE Environ.Ofcr.
Fridley, MN 55432
f 1 �� 15
�`�;�.i F�.OF; co�cu�R[_r�cE !�Y THc. CI � Y COUNCIL - ESTI;1.pTES
t! -- l'JOVEMBER 9 i�ul.
Herrick & Newman, P.A.
6270 University Avenue, NE
Fridley, MN 55432
�
For legal services rendered as City Attorney
for the month of October, 1!�81 � 3,247.05
H & S Asphalt Company
700 INdustry Avenue N.L•J.
Anoka, MN 55303
Partial Est. #1 - Work on O,ak Glen Creek
Detenti on.. P o:nd $10,245.00
Crossings, Inc.
P.O. Box 10
Prior Lake, MP� 55372
Partial Est. #1 - Moore Lak�e Restoration Project
(Storm Sewer Diversions) - :S & W 132 $36,337.50
VIROIL C. MERRICK
DAVID P.NEWMAN
HERRIC:K 6� NEWMAN, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
November 5, 1981
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue Northea:st
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
October Retainer:
Hours in Excess of 30 @$45.00 per hour:
COURT APPEARANCES:
Fridley vs. U Haul
Fridley vs. Nelson
EXPENSES ADVANCED:
District Court (File Petition i�e Bergstrom)
57 xerox copies
TOTAL BALANCE DUE:
6270 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY-� MINNESOTA 55432
671-3850
$1650.00
1363.50
150.00
50.00
25.00
8.55
$3247.05
1� A
�, � 16
�`J F"OF; c��icugRCr�cE �Y TH� Cf � Y COUNCEL - ���;ji'�$
�_� iVOVEMBER 9, �9g1
CI_AIf1 NUi�1BERS
23��N34 - 31_16�1