The URL can be used to link to this page

03/22/1982 - 5263-�; FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING PL�ASE SIG�! NAP�iE ADDP,ESS ANQ ITEM NIJMaER INTERESTED IN DATE: Marcfi 22, 1982 NAME ADDRESS ITEM NUMaER --------__-----�_____________________________________________l====-_-----_-_________ -___-_-_-_=� � %�� a� �.� '�:u, �<.,.,.... — � �t� l� � � � �s. c,�.lc � , c -i� � ' � J� c1c v' �bo, �ruc�c r v� e �- 'rn �s ab „�. 1-1 S� �� a ,� �� 1 "J%,r'��-._ ��SQ.? �...� — f � I"�� Y / . �6 U r1 � 1 SS lSS 1 ,v � �"� . 2 — � � i ,/ '� �/ C� � �� , ,_,, ; <� ,�d' ;:�,C � ' % S {%�;L�:�_ ,�' j s%`'- , i % FC. � ( ! %'�� !' ,/`r ! � � > � /,� C 'J � / � � � 5 . � , � ,rc �`1S ' �1 �' . T- �-��'. . .. f • �� .. �J . l :! I . .-+�-�"' f - r- � ��'�. l. 1 �[.� �!,° `i� , r`. � � �l. rL' � rI' ! . � - �• V ( � � ••, � T . . . L�'t � � . -'% ! . � ; � �l `S � [ . v` �r /! .± � . 1 � 2 r ` � � t�.y�/ :P 8` �'` g i �r � I� A �=� . � �C _ a,� o��.�. �. � ,�, � �r �r�� S � iJ�Ksf, ; � � - �-�� .�� r� �.S � via .��9 h ,� G� .. i � c� < r(�1 -`j• t"�r .- � ?}r � l�c`_ �'�� ! M.�+J � i �. ,; , Y Y��j...4 A: i �1./' � Y� �✓� r��✓ . ..�.___.,.L_� � � ! ' f� l�..Y � . , � � �— ' t . v x', �' U, f � „; �, .� � ..� .r r,,;.�... K d � �Cf ��,� N t,..t� G e �� k' �:R.� , � �� .� � % �1 �' 2 2 � l - � � L.ul� .Z �J /G d / .iL r��,1' � TJ � - .s �' 6 7 � �'�' , �` � �. �". I � 1 s ".� r ,� � � � • �� . � " ' � � � `� � ' ' � � ,*i 4 ',`�y1 �� ' � 7 ;�.�,�� .;� � �_: �1�� ;!��" �wt�,,�-c I--- � /lvol �rl• .z��,�3rv« �,� -is i �� U 1 i✓ � � Z� ' i "- - . .t_ ,'' o�' � � — � � �L .i � '� -� r � �^. � � ( � , r �. �� ' _ ' i � � `, � � �-��-� l.. �}it�� `E� '� .i,� / / �� Ci t � �'.�' �,i- bl . �Y.i t^ U�G; (41 � , � • � -^ ( i; .! b �%i . /�„i • '' i� ' l�' S FS 4' C.� G � � �,^ A � t � � h�� , �� a �� - �s ° ,' " ' �`� � . i a , � n-FL f'J � J rl v A� s�` .% �_ ��{- t''�_ � ' a � �� LEV( ti-��'. �T��}:� ��,`>I t,, �� . �, ° ; ' � �. ��3,�:� ��.�„ �:�� } ` � jd �1-r�� ,��;: �,L>��S � , � � 1�C1 / A.J , .i .c��,�s�l'UC /�,� r j ,---~ �.�:��x,�;� /`�'� .� ��. i�:'�, :� -> r I � � � �'� rV �'� �€ �,' ,.,,_--.�._ 1 �.�J C , � '�. � tl.�u��; '�::) � � , 4��,, .�� -�-�.. "� � � � jl^�(� �i,\ �� . Q"� � ;;t . �y ',, �.„�� . �Jd-.�- �V ��1.,� � _ .:�-'�r� � T�.i..;�i�,_� r+�„ � .<' '��j, �� ..�"-;�. �. t �c �, �,C�„ � f � /; :_< � 1+.' , �..� . � �11'�' :��,.r _ t'�.: �� ( ��.� -- ,\J V�w� { �^.' r ��t �� r I � : '`...� � �C.. J� . �--(y r � j / J ��.��%"7'i..'C.� ��il-"'f J � i.. . �, � '�`J I ��/ �,{�.;�� :;:;-a.t��c..--r.-(_-d—�-'�"G� � V �� - t�� l�t-�- � � � � S �� . � � ,�� ; ._ - , �%. � �� ,l j � �� . a 1 �,� � � �- e- �'� :� � ,� , "°' � �� !�' ;,,�' , �' �` , ,� , �_ ��+/ ��•'. r; � � � A �,�,5 ,ti � E��" .:g r _. �!s { f F�<` �C`'..F�./ , � c �.�...�' � _ � -f- , --r �f , � Ii,. C.�:%�� { i � � . , � . , . � .—= ,.� _--. , �--, ; / J , � ��.G � .ro' f� 1 � fr�',' fl .: + 'h � , � � !q ~ �A � / t:-_ i (� C..,i:.,,,t� C......� � � �. . , r�� .. iC`'' � i�� t�K- w � `" � � � � 3 0 - � `> �Y: t � , y; �� ,;'� �, f ;...�1 �,. t ' ;,, , , ,. ` '.. � t 1,� <:. ��°t-t�..- � , � � � ;) ��' ,� . ji, d t.��L,-Z,,,s ��+,,;� � � l,t.. �'�a, r �,: � �.�'=- "7 ..- �, � � �'C� G� � . �..E? , l� � .�' . ;, �:L. �-, �:c.c.-cZ-�2� C� ��... �...� <"'.. r , y �--r��`'r„ ..�� 1�...:..._ _ � ... �, J � y�-�. 'Y` �::� j s',:� t�,s�R�'lj, ' l�.a6,�?r"'� ,.. �� ` f.� � , �f�� : �,, /A .W�.' ° r ;`,, . � t.. � . •. # � � �. : ° ��_ f: ° �` . � ln_ � �" � � �t v�� (�..ti.� � r . � . � � , � " � 1 . � ,,!.�., k' S 1 � i. � ,r� r�^"r .� "t` . �! � �f f��t�� " .��y Y �i`W��' j`^ �+°. : . �� ,✓ `` �� , /� _.� E � � rt � (1�U � f �c� ..;-''�7 ! '?t `� ) � '" /'�:. t `°�z� (_.) y" � "E �t -../ .� . -��%r�'!."..� , - , ' ; i _. . — . , � � / �>v1 ��;, �� 4�.,� � , �r-,. : , � , t U ... . � % . c, � ' {.' ,;� ,; �, � `,� ,1 I _� �1 C'��v \��1:`�..�.l...�.\ 0 L�.,... 1 . ... ` f y-�.:.':�.\*...-..'l��, }i : \. O l�l� �� L��`�.. � ��o � 1 N�..1.- te,� ►�) S`� ' �.�� =L-! Cl�, �»...,.a�;.. � �1J� '" � �� Y? � .-. , • , ��QI c.t �,��;�7 , j��Ji�..t:.,� �� , �. , � , .. � . ^ ... °^� --�(''�`� � �. � , ::. ` '� � : - � t'�,�i `� t �_.�.'`,�', � +� '=:a. �'�'� � y�-�'{� E:3. � ..,r�� u � FRfDLEY CITY COUNC t L MARC� I 22, 1982 - 7: 30 P, M, _ MEMO T0: DEPARTMEN7 HEADS FOLLOWING ARE THE ��ACTIONS NEEDED". PLEASE HAVE YOUR ANSWERS BACK IN THE CITY ��IANAGER�S 4FFICE BY THE WEDNESDAY BEFORE THE NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING� THANK YOU. /��,�,�; �j �J�'��• (, � IPUBLIC WORKS �OUNC I L MEET I NG, MARCH �i, 1982 Approved .� ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Adopted OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: �CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA —�� MINUTES) No Response PUBLIC HEARINGS: PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER ZI% OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW ZI% PROHIBITING �ONVERSION OF RENTAL MULTIPLE DWELLINGS TO CONDOMINIUM FORM OF OWNERSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF 18 MoNTHS . . . . . . . . .: . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . , 1 - 1 S Opened 7;38 P.�1. Closed 9:45 P.M. ACTION NEEDED: Put ordinance on next agenda for consideration of first reading PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS ICITY MANAGER COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH ZZ, I9 PUBLIC HEARI�GS (CoNTiNUED) Pa PUBLIC HEARING OF REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #gZ—OI TO REZONE FROM M-1 TO R-2 PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF MISSISSIPPI STREET, EAST OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN RIGHT—OF—WAY, W� G� DOTY AND GARY A� WELLNER� ��— 2 � Opened 9:45 P.M. Tabled (after two recesses)to meeting of April 5, 1982 ACTION NEEDED: Put Continued Public Hearing on next agenda � OLD BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, P�INNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS FROM R-3 TO CR-1 (ZOA #80-02), IOOI HILLWIND ROAD, TED BURANDT, DBA/SwiNC REALTY �TABLED 1/18/82)� �� Second Reading tabled to meeting of April 19, 1982 ACTION NEEDED: Put back on agenda of April 19, 1982 ��:-3E CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING OLD CHAPTER ZZO OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING NEW CNAPTER 2ZO ENTITLED RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY AND CONDOMINIUM COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE CODE� � � � � � � � � � � , � Ordinance No. 747 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Publish ordinance in Fridley Sun , � � — � � , �o OLD BUSINESS (CoNTiNUED) , CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO ENERGY COMMISSION iTABLED 4/S/gZ) � � � � � � � � � � , � � � � � � . � . � 5 One Appointment made: Bill Jordan, 895 76th Avenue N.E:, 786-5504 CITY MANAGER ACTION NEEDED: Put back on next agenda for second appointment 6 NEW BUSINESS: RECEIVING CATV COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 1$, 1982� �E — 6 T Received BLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: File for future reference RECEIVING CATV COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY z5, 1982 .AND CONSIDERATI4N OF A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE SOLICITATION OF PROPOSAL FOR RENEWAL OF A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM FROM NORTHERN CABLEVISION, INC� � , � � � � � . . 7 - 7 E l.. Consideration of final drafts of cable franchise renewal, Items A through F.. ........................... 7� - 7D CATV Recommendation: Approval Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation and Consideration of Resolution Minutes Received. Resolution tabled to meeting of April 5, and to be discussed at conference meeting IC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Put on agenda of conference meeting and April 5, 1982 _ , COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH NEW BUSIPdESS (CONTINUED) RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION P�1NUTES OF ��ARCH Z�, 1982 � � � � � � � � � � � . � . � � � � � � � � �' - � S 1. Consideration of Lot Split Request, L.S. #82-02, to make a buildable lot, 6530 Oakley Street, � Mark Anderson. ....... ..... .. . ......... ......... S - EA. P.C. Recommendation: Approval with two stipulations �$E - �G Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation Approved with stipulations PUBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicani of Council approval with stipulations � 2. Consideration of Lot Split Request, L.S. #82-03, to combine into three lots, 110 and i20 - 64z Avenue and 6430 East River Road (latter will need address change if split), Donna Miller ........................... 8A - �3 P.C. Recommendation: Approval with provision re: � 8H - �N easement Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation Tabled item to meeting of April 5, 1982 PUBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Put item back on agenda of April 5, 1982 3. Consideration of Extension of Special Use Permit, SP #78-10 by Allen B. Stahlberg ......... ................ 8B - 8D P.C. Recommendation: Approval of extension of one year, & 80 - 8S with five reasons listed CouncSl Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation Extension approved for one year PUBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council approval of one year extension RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ONE TON , DUMP TRUCK �OPENED MARCH ZZ, 1982 AT Z:OO P�P„)� .�.� a- g E Bids received and contract awarded to Superior Ford (low bidder) PARKS & REC ACTION NEEDED: Inform all bidders of Council award NEW BUSINESS (CoNTiNUED) CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1, SECTIONS I�OZ AND I�O3 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE EN7ITLED ��LEGISLATIVE BODY" RELATING TO WARD AND PRECINCT BOUNDARIES WITHIN THE CITY, � � � � � � � � IO Ordinance approved on first reading with amendments ENTRAL SERV. ACTION NEEDED: Incorporate amendments and put on next agenda for consideratio of second reading CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS, �HASSIS MOUNTED POTHOLE PATCHER� ��, 11 - 11 E Resoiution No. 24-1982 adopted �UBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Proceed with advertisi:ng for bids CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO CURRENT TOWING CONTRACT � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . . � , . � . � � IZ — I2 L' Approved with amendment 'OLICE DEPT. ACTION NEEDED: Amend current towing contract as discussed and execute SETTING BOARD OF �CEVIEW h,EETING FOR N�AY �4, IQSZ .,, 1� Meeting set for May 24, 1982 :ENTRAL SERV. ACTION NEEDED: Make arrangements for meeting on May 24, 1982 , CLA I MS . � , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 14 Approved CENTRAL SERV. ACTI.ON NEEDED: Pay claims NEW BUSINESS (CoNTtNUED) LI CENSES , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 15 - 15 L Approved CENTRAL SERV ACTION NEEDED: Issue licenses ESTIMATES� . . � � � . � . . . � � � � � � � � � � � � lE - 16 B Approved TRAL SERV. ACTION NEEDED: Pay estimates ADJOURiV �2:05 A.M. , - I" ,� FRIDLEY C1TY COUNC I L PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MARCH 22, 1982 - 7:30 P, M. �OUNC I L MEET I NG, MARCH �i, 1982 �t f. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORUi�, V I S I TORS ; �CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON aGENDA - IS MINUTES) PUBLIC HEARINGS: PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER ZI% OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW Z1� PROHIBITING CONVERSION OF RENTAL MULTIPLE DWELLINGS TO CONDOMINIUM FORM OF OWNERSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF I$ MON7HS � � � � � � � � �: � � � � � � � � � , � � � � � � 1 - � S �OUNCIL MEETING, MARCN ZZ, Igg2 PUBLIC HEARI�GS tCoNTiNUED) PUBLIC HEARING OF REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #gZ-OI TO REZONE FROM M-1 TO R-Z PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCA7ED SOUTH OF MISSISSIPPI STREE7, EAST OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY, W� G� DOTY AND GARY A� WELLNER� � �- 2 J � OLD BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS FROM R-3 TO �R-1 (ZOA #80-02), IOOI HILLWIND ROAD, TED BURANDT, DBA/SwtN� REALTY �TABLED 1/18/82)� ��- 3 E CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING OLD CHAPTER ZZO OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING NEW CNAPTER ZZO ENTITLED RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY AND CONDOMINIUM COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE CODE� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � - 4 � , COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH ZZ, I��Z NEW BUSIPdESS (Co►vTiNUED) i� RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION P�1NUTES OF P��ARCH 10, 1982, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , � — � S 2. Consideration of Lot Split Request, L.S. #82-02, to make a buildable lot, 6530 Oakley Street, ' Mark Anderson. ...... ................................ E - EA P.C. Recommendation: Approval with two stipulations � 8E -�G Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation 2. Consideration of Lot Split Request, L.S. #82-03, to combine into three lots, 110 and 120 - 64z Avenue and 6430 East River Road (latter will need address change if split), Donna Miller ........................... 8A - G3 P.C. Recommendation: Approval with provision re: � 8H - oN easement Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation 3. Consideration of Extension of Special Use Permit, SP #78-]0 by Allen B. Stahlberg .......................... 8B - SD P.C. Recommendation: Approval of extension of one year, R�80 - 8S with five reasons listed Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ONE TON , DUMP TRUCK �OPENED MARCH ZZ, 1�� AT Z:OO P�t��)� �� a- g E � NEW BUSItiESS (CONTINUED) LICENSES, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , � � 15 - 15 L ESTIMATES, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , IE - 16 B ADJOURiV , � �? THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETIPJG OF MARCH 8, 1982 The Fridley City Councit Meeting was called to order at 7:50 p. m. by Mayor Nee, as there was a delay in the start of the meeting due to technical difficulties in the transmission of the meeting by Cable Television. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Counciiman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Hamernik, Mayor hJee, and Councilman Schneider MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Barnette PRESENTATIONS: CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING - CITY OF FRIDLEY: Mr. Charles Garth, representing the Municipal Finance Officers of Minnesota and Canada, presented a Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting to the City. Mr. Garth stated the City of Fridley met all the program standards for financial reporting and indicated that out of 79,000 govern- mental units in the country that could qualify, only 253 have this certificate and there are only 14 such certificates in Minnesota. Mr. Garth stated he felt this was quite an achievement for the City's Financial Department. Mayor Nee accepted the certificate on behalf of the staff and stated this was truly a credit to the City Manager and Financial Officer. FINANCIAL REPORTING ACNIEVEMENT AWARD - RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCE OfFICER: Mr. Garth also presented an award for Financial Reporting Achievement to the City's Finance Officer, Richard D. Pribyl. Fir. Pribyl extended his thanks to Mr. Garth on behalf of himself and the City and stated it was very fine to be associated with such an award. The Council extended their congratulations to Mr. Pribyl for receiving this award. P1r. Garth pointed out that Standard and Poors have stated that cities that do not have this performance certificate may not qualify for a good bond rating so this may help Fridley in obtaining a lower interest rate on their next bond issue. PROCLAMATION - RECYCLING IN FRIDLEY WEEK - APRIL 18-24, 1982: Mayor Nee stated the Environmental Quality Corrmission has proposed a proclamation for Recycling Week in fridley from April 18 - 24, 1982. He stated he would proceed to issue this proclamation, as requested by the Comnission. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22, 1982: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes of february 22, 1932 as presented. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 49. COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 1982 PAGE 2 ADOP7ION OF AGENDA: Councilman Schneider requested the following item be added to the agenda: "Consideration of a Resolution in Opposition to Legislation Regarding Mobile Homes". MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting �ye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: There was no response from the audience under this item of business. OLD BUSINESS: �� 1 CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMFNT TO ENERGY CONPtISSION �TABLED 2J22/82): MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to table this item to the next meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion.carried unanimously. ,�, CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READIN6 OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING OLD CHAPTER Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this ordinance primarily addresses the inspection of condominium common areas, as well as adding items regarding energy efficiency and some housekeeping items. He stated some verbage was changed to make it easier reading. h}r. Flora suggested changing the title of the ordinance so the new Chapter 220 would be called "Residential Rental and Codominium Comnon Area Maintenance Code". � Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated there are several other adjustments to be made to this ordinance and they could be added this evening or Council could table this item and have the ordinance brought back at ' the next meeting with the amendments. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table this item to the next meeting. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Plee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: ,� RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 24 1982: � A REQUEST FOR A LQT SPLIT, L. S_ #82-01, PATRICIA L. LESTER: SPLIT MOTIUN by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recomnendation of the Planning Commission and grant Lot Split #82-01. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �� REQUEST FOR REZONING, ZOA #82-01 BY W, G. DOTY AND GARY A. WE � REZONE FROh1 M-1 TO R-2 THE AREA GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF MI STREET, EAST OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to set the public hearing on this rezoning request for March 22, 1982. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee decla red the motion carried unanimously. 50: COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8. 1982 PA6E 3 � ENVIRONh1ENTAL QUALITY COPIMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 16, 1982: Mr. Fiora, Public Works Director, stated the Environmental Quality Commission at their February 16, 1962 meeting made a motion for the issuance of a proclamation for Recycling Week in Fridley. He stated this item was acted on earlier in the meeting, and Mayor Nee would issue the proclamation. Mr. Flora stated the other item submitted by the Cortmission for the Council's consideration was for the City to accelerate their recycling efforts. Mr. Flora stated staff is currently dealing with several vendors regarding the possibility of recycling paper in the City. He further stated there will be an oil recycling center, adjacent to the SORT facility, and it wili be functional during Recycling Week. P10TION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission P1eeting of February 24, 1982. Seconded by Councilman Schneioer. Upon a voice vote, al] voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4 RECIEVING CHARTER COMMISSIOt� MIP�UTES OF FEBRUARY 2, 1982: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the minutes of the Charter Commission Meeting of February 2, 1982. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 5 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AtdNUAL WORK PLANS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND HUMAld RESOURCES COM�lISSION: �107ION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the annual work plans for the O�rrmunity Development Comnission and the Human Resources Conmission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6 RESOLUTION N0. 21-1982 ADVERTISING FOR BIDS FOR A HIGH VELOCITY SEWER CLEANER AND 7RUCK: Mr. flora, Public Works Director, stated the high velocity jetting machine and GMC truck have both been in service for over 10 years. Mr. F1ora stated, because of the age of the equipment, it was felt a new one should be purchased before the City gets into a lot of major repair bi71s and while the equipment stil] has some resale value. Mr. Flora stated there are funds in the Utility Fund to purchase this type of equipment. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 21-1982. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, ail voting aye, Mayor PJee dec7ared the motion carried unanimously. ` RESOLUTION N0. 22-1982 AUTHORIZING CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE GENERAL FUNQ AND HOME OWNERSNIP FUND FOR THE YEAR 1981: Mr. Inman, City Clerk, stated this is a standard resolution brought every year to the Council adjusting allocations in the General Fund. P � � �. 51. COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 1982 PAGE 4 M07ION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 22-1982. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor ��ee declared the motion carried unanimously. � CLAIMS• MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to authorize payment of Claims No. 027E12 through 064N10. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon•a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. C� LICENSES: Councilman Schneider questioned why the North Park Elementary School was charged a fee for the vending machines while Totino-Grace was "Exempt". Mr. Inman, City Clerk, stated this should be "Exempt" also on the vending machines. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office, with the exemptil�n of the fee for vending machines at North Park Elementary School which should be "Exempt". Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 1 � ESTIMATES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted. Herrick & Newman, P.A. Attorneys at Law 6279 University Avenue, N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 January Retainer for Services Rendered o1.653.90 Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 23-1982 IN OPPOSITION TO SENATE 1 �� rn r un .-.�n r��nT i�..�� .. ..�..�....� ... .. � _,....._. � . 1677 AND HOUSE hi0TI0N by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 23-1982 and direct staff to circulate this resolution to the appropriate persons and the State representatives. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. COMMUNICATIONS: 1 1 FRIENDLY FRIDLEY FOLKS, INC.: THAPJK YOU FOR GIFT MONEY: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the communiciation from the friendly Fridley Folks, Inc. Seconded by Councilman fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion � carried unanimously. ��L LETTER OF SUPPORT TO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL: Mayor Nee stated the Friendly Fridley Folks have submitted an application for funding to the Metropolitan Council indicating the Council's support of this application. J7 COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 1982 PAGE 5 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to direct the administration to send a letter to the Metropolitan Council in support of the Friendly Fridley Folks' application for funding. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voi�e vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 1 2, SORT�NC.: CONTINUATION OF CURBSIDE PICKUP PROGRAM: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated SORT, Inc. wanted a longer time to evaluate the curbside pickup program in the City and is, therefore. requesting an extension of time for this program. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to allow SORT to continue the curbside pickup program until further action by this Council. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting a�ye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � 2� RECEIVING LETTER FROM WILLIS UNKE, CHAIRMAN, TAXPAYERS FOR RESPONSIBLE RECREATION, REGARDIN6 A MEETING DATE WITH THE COUNCIL: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the letter from Willis UnYe. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to establish an informal meeting, with proper legal notification, for March 15, 1982 at 8:15 p. m., as requested by Mr. Unke. Seconded by Councilman.Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Fridley City Council Meeting of �larch 8, 1982 adjourned at 8:25 p, m. Respectfully submitted, Caroie Haddad Secy. to the City Council Approved: William J. Nee Mayo r ._. . --_---- —��-� � PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL NOTICE is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday, March 22, 1982 in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of : An ordinance repealing Chapter 217 of the Fridley City Code, and replacing it with a new Chapter 217, prohibiting the con- version of rental multiple dwellings to a condominium form of ownership, for a period of 18 months. Anyone desiring be to heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. 4JILLIA�1 J. NEE MAYOR Publish: March 3, 1982 March 10, 1982 1 � > TME FAi OF DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE �rch 17, 1982 FROM �D.P.W. Jerrol d L SUBJECT Condo Ordinance MEMO N0. 82-19 TO John Flora �1�.A .� MEMOFaANDUM ACTION INFO. X Please find attached an Ordinance establishing a new Chapter 217 prohibiting conversion of rental multiple dwellings to the condominium form of ownership for a period of 18 months.' According to Chapter 515 A. 1-106 of the Minnesota State Statutes (Uniform Condominium Act), a municipality can only restrict or prohibit condominium conversion if they can show that there exists a signifi- cant shortage of suitable rental dwellings available to low and moderate income individuals or families. We have completed a housing study which we will also present at this meeting, to show that a significant shortage does exist in the City and that it wouid be in the City's best interest to place temporary restrictions on conversions up to 18 months. During this 18 month period we would further analyze the potential for conversions and work to set up specific controls that will assist in satis- fying the above noted conditions. JLB/de Ot�II�Il�N(Z 1�D. _ �P d�I1�t�E P5AffidS8Il�1G A l�i+l �P'1'ffit 217 Q� '� FRID[BY CI'PiC �E HTFI'Pf1� "�1VStSIQ7 �" K'D REPEtiLING pit� �,p18t 217 The City Camcil of the City of Fridley dces ordain as follaws: u�.oi pux�asE Zl�e City Cau�cil of the City of Fridley deens that there exists in the City a significant shortage of suitable rental dwellings available to low and moderate income individuals or families. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the City to impose temporary restrictions on the conversion of existing rental m�ltiple dwellings to a�ndominium form of ownership. 217.02 DEFIPIITIQ�S As nsed in this Ordinance the terms c7efir�d shall have the meanings ascribed to thaa. 1. "Concianiniwn" means a multiple dwelling in which portions are designated for separate ownership and the remainder of which is designated for common ownership solely by the aaners of these portions. A multiple dwelling is not a condaniniwn unless the �u►divided interests in the cortmon elenents are vested in the �mit owners. 2. 'Conversion Condominium" means a multiple dwelling which has been converted fran rental units to ownership �mits in accocdance with the Uniform Condaminitmi Act (Qi. 582 - 1980 session). 3. "Dwelling Unit" means a single �it providing oomplete indepes�dent living facilities for one or more persons including pernianent provfsions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. 4. "Multiple Dwellirg" means any building or structure containing therein two or more dwelling units whether used solely or exclusively for residential Purposes. 5. "bcisting I�ltiple Dwelling" means any miltiple dwelling existing at the effective date of this ordinance. 6. "Owner" means the person or boc3y having an interest in a m�ltiple dwelling as a fee owr�r or a�bordinate interest with the right to exercise control and mar�aganent of the premises. 217.03 L�iaG14i OF' RE�RRICTioN There shall be no oonversia► oondaniniums authorized in the City of Fridley for a period of 18 months from the effective date of this ordinance. This restricti� shall not apply to any conversion wndominium for which a bonafide loan conenittment for a consideration has been issued by a lender and is in effect on t1�e date of adoption of this ordinance, or for which a notice of condominium conversion or intent to convert containing a termination of tenancy has been given to at least 758 of the tenants and subtenants in possession prior to the date of adoption of this ordinance. 217.04 RIGH't5 OF 74� CI'PY The City can extend its length of restriction or impose other reasonable conditions upon oonversion condominiums if after the prescribed length of restriction, the City still finds that there exists a significant shortage of suitable rps►tal dwellings available to laa and moderate incane inc3ividuals or faonilies. PASSID AND ADOFfID BY 1iiE CITY OF FRIDLEY 'ffiIS __ ��' . 1981 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR w r. SIIR4E�'Y C. IbIl�N - CITY Q�Q2R First Reading: Second Reading: �ii�: � 1C 9 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF FRIOLEY. AND THE EFFECT OF COP�DOMINIUM CONVERSIOPJ ON THAT MARKET FRIDLEY PLANNING�DEPARTMENT � 0 MARKET OVERVIEW The City of Fridley, as a metropolitan suburb,follows the overall trends and conditions of the seven county Metropolitan Area. Therefore, any metro- politan forcasts, trends,reports affecting the subject matter of this re ort affects the City of Fridley in a similar manner. � In the iast few years, the Twin Cities housing market has been a major con- cern of regional and local governmental units alike. The Metropolitan Council has just recently completed a ten report Housing Market Study which provides the basis of change to the regional housing policies and necessary information to local units of government concerned with current trends in housing. According to this study, the region will need to increase its housing stock almost 25 per- cent in the 1980's to accomnodate the anticipated growth in households. This means that 178,000 housing units should be added to the current stock of 744,852 units: This would require about the same trends in housing production in the regian as it had in the 1970's. The cyclical nature of housing production nation- ally and locally indicates how the housing construction industry has been used as a tool to either heat up or cool off the national economy, primarily through interest rate manipulation and tightening of the money supply. At present, the production of housing units is down with no foreseeable relief in sight. On top of this, there will be large increases in the age groups entering their twenties and thirties. These additional households promise to affect the housing market in much the same �vay they precipitated major school expansion in the 50's and 60's. An estimated 438,000 persons in the region will turn 3Q in the 1980's compared with 315,000 in the 1970's. Most of these people are already housed in apartments and should greatly �ncrease demand for single family housing in the 1980's. The age group turning 20 is the one responsible for expanding total housing needs in the region during the 1980's. Between 1980 and 1990, about 405,000 people will turn 20 and forming their first households. This increase, together with today`s smaller household trend, has given cause for concern. In addition, fewer apartment units are constructed for rent. Inflation has pushed apartment construc- tion costs to the point where rents on new units equal or exceed ownership costs. The tightening rental market could pose a dilemma for the large group in their twenties looking for apartments. Unless there is adequate housing production in the 1980's, continued conversion of rental units will force different housing choices on these people. Further, a tight rental market will place extraordinary pressure on lower-income people who can't afford to buy housing. The inflationary double squeeze of higher prices and higher interest rates has forced monthly housing expenses way up in the region. In 1977, only nine percent of the region's new home buyers paid more than $600 per month, by 1979, 50 percent did. The 1979 median housing income was $22,700 which qualified a household for housing priced uner �50,000 with conventional mortgage at fixed interest rate. Very few homes were soid in this price range in 1979, and even fewer are available today. By 1979, 63 percent of the areas home buyers relied on a second income to get financing, compared to 52 percent in 1977. In conjunction with this, only 23 percent of the home buyers in 1979 were first time home owners, �ompared to 35 percent in 1977. With these figu�'es in mind, probably no more than 12 percent of the area renters today could qualify to buy a medium-priced low-$60,000 townhouse, condomin- ium or existing home. New homes are even further out of reach. -1- lE The above trends indicated by the Metropolitan Council's Housing Market Study help us analyze the current housing situation in the City of Fridley and its overall effect on affordable housin9 for low and moderate income households. -2- 1F INVENTORY - ANALYSIS HOUSIP�G SUPPLY In 1980, the Metropolitan Council estimated that 10,641 housing units existed in Fridley. Of this total. 6,616 were single family, 3.057 were rtwltiple dwelling, 562 were townhouses and 406 were mobile homes. The 1980 Census revealed that 10,660 units existed in the city. HOUSING TENURE (Ownership vs. Rental) - � According to Anoka County Assessor Homestead Counts, Fridley has 6,612 owner occup�ied housing units. This figure indicates that the remaining 4,032 units of the City's 10,660 units are rental. VACANCY RA1'E Vacanc:y rate has been on the downward swing in Fridley since 1975 as seen in Tat►le 1-l. The first quarter of 1975 had a total vacancy rate of 3.4� and dr�opped gradually to 1.7� after the third quarter of 1981. 7he dc�wnward trend was more drastic for multiple family units. The first quari:er of 1975 had a vacancy rate of 9.1�. The rate fluctuated down- ward to 4.9� by the third quarter of 1981. The current vacancy rate reveals that the rE:ntal market is very tight at this time. Furthermore, no relief is in sigh�t with construciion starts of new rental units almost non-existent. NEW CONSTRUCTION OF RENTAL UNITS The construction of new rental units in the City since 1978 is shown below: In contrast to the demand for housing and housing needs for low and moderate income households, new construction has fallen far short. 1978 1979 1980 1981 Du lex 22 units 18 un i ts 4 units 2 units ir�f��mati�rr�ource: Multiple 16 un i ts 4 units 6 units 0 units Fridley Building Inspector This dc►wnward trend of new construction of rental units is expected to continue iri the foreseeable future due to economic conditions affecting the housing inciustry. SUPPLY OF I.OW AND P10DERATE INCOME RENTAL UNITS In J�une of 1981, the Metropolitan Council surve,�ed the monthly rental rates of 1502 of Fridley's rental units. This survey data was cross tabulated with HUD's Section 8 rental limites for low and moderate income households to determine the percentage of units in the survey that are affordable to low and moderate income households. It was found that 78.3� of the units surveyed were affordable to low and moderate income households. The results of the cross tabulation are shown in Table 1-2. - 3- G Z W � � W F�- � �- � z a v ¢ � � 1 r W J m Q �"r _ 1G Y =J `" � � N f N O � 4'f < O� 1� N Q � � �O f� � 1[! N p� N O� aD O+ O� � �O �p N O� �ff �G O � O N CD �� W N N N r lV N � .r N N � N N N � 1`9 W O M ..J Z 4 HH H m �p � � � � g ..�- N b � 1�'1 A ��'1 00 r !N"f O � �[f d CO n tNlf f� IX� �O �t9 h � 4'f ♦ h f� 1d 1!! f� f� N - N W � T W �� p N Ii'1 01 O O � N f0 Lff � f� f� Nf N Nf N O1 � � � et �C �t N' tt �! �T !�f �tf �ff � �'f �t • e af �t at e�f 1i O Z � j j N d S� f" � a O� 10 Q� M O A C� �O .- 1� ^ C� � N W N N � � � A O r N N � N O O f� N !'��f N � !+f I�+f � N Pf 1�f Mf N M (�'1 M N M M N � W OC �' �,=j N W H� 1� O t0 � !� N {�f Nf 1tf P'f �D 1� 1� O O� Nf � A O Z O� C00 r N Of f� � N CO 1� r N O� f� O � 1D A r O tD rr 2� � r r � r � � � � � C N J� «~.� � ~ H � O `� f� O 01 m � 01 N CmO �pp � r d c�'f �O 1� �r n �O O �f� O r- CO t0 � i'� �O O � O� 1� O O fi7 f� � O 00 � � � � _ � � r � Y O Z 1-W-et d d Q tC tG N � r' r' � � O O O O r � � r� = V �O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O F- Q Z 7 O N x= z� �� e��f P�! � � ,��. �O � �O � nf e'9 e�'f Pf d � CO O� � � � NO � J � W J G r� f� !+f CD Q O C� �O O N r- r �i! O O� l'7 f� r- ►. 1�'� . . , � . ��- �C� e•f O O O .�- �O �O �e'i CO aD us u9 �O � A e� .� � �!! L� t� �. � � r � W Q . J t5 d Q r. > J a~.O t0 Cfl Q N N �!f L1'f M LCf 01 N r 01 1� e�9 O� Q � �O � =117 tn f� O� OD N f� t0 �G l'9 r af �f �O O O� r N N Q �N f�f N N N !'�f f � r r N N r r� � N r N !7 N � > J £> 1-O+ O N �O �O O� f� �O u't tT tD YY � 10 1� �G �D 00 O+ �O LL z �O r � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 4 w c.� <,J,S7 � N �.~-�CD t0 n N O t0 O� CO �O r O� 1� r 1[f N Q LL"f O 1� O N ZtLf t0 f� � � 1ff Q 1+f nf �G {�i �+S l�7 Q �[f V � �O �G �C � Z F^d' �O Q� �Q �ff .� O� N r- � !+ C1 CO N 1� d !� Q� O� 01 V7 Y OaCC'! d �"� Nf e'f � N N N l�f N r� � N N N N e�'f N � O Z _ = V N 4�.-~.Cn N tn �C N CO d Nf O� �G � Ot N Q 01 I� d CQ �O � +O N � � N � N O C� O� 1� f� .� �1f t"f � � a+ � � ��'f Q c"f Af 1'�'f fVf N N '+ N N � .� N N N N l'r! N r i� - _ �I�1�1�1�1�i�I�I�L�l�l�l�l�l�l�l�l�l�l� � i O�i i �i d M i � Q � N � � ' � � d N i 7 C � N �n �n �o � A � r � � � � ,�+ I Q Q Q � � � �o �o � a � O~+ � r � � a°�+ ,�+ L � L Q Q Q � � � � v�+ v�+ c^+ o�+ � a o�+ r r .� .-� r � � � � Y i� i� i� iJ Q O' =C ? �' Q Q � H � � � g � � ^ � � � d �+ L A ? � < v+ � � W a.� i A Q a� N r o� a+ o�+ � � r N � L L Q Q � L N !�f a a r L � L �O � � Q -a � � C .� � C O �..� � C d i , H G1 � r0 � � t� C � b V t0 � W 1� O� �D O CO O� O Z J 6 4'! �'q I � q� ^ N N � � p[ � N N p W � �O � J OC = 6 � �-+ N � F=.. J � !'�f fp�p Q� N � = Q 10 ^ � � �D � �� W J Y W 1A �G � N � O� N �«J.� OC d N Pf Mf H'! N !�1 {� �W OC � U1 Li O � Z W C Fd- C9 H N N f� Q � N ~ � � � ^ N � N N � N = r N N W G C7 W f•/ � CU � W �C O� �,'j aZ+ � Q 10 On O� f� 10 O� C� N W � .-�. O O S Z .~-� G H i-- t0 tCi �C[D! � r � 01 � O =�D �� O+ e� � O^+ EO > W O C� O O O � � O z Q O C� O O O O O ¢ � S t� ra z� � W ►x+ 2 1- C n� N N N �O � NO� > W tt e► m tV L['f �O R �-Ji Q � V� 4'Y tl") 1{'f �O � �� ! li i.i Z W Q a¢ ..� � � u� un �o � a+ o 0 � .. u� oo �o u� u� o+ v � = r �- � r � r � Y W uQ h �O � �O �O 1ff J � O C� O O O O O � r c.� �z a W {> Z y.~-. Q iC''f d N � � �'q N Z � Z FW- � •� O a0 O e•f � Q r 1�1 N � N N � N Y G.' S � p>�.~. O�i ��+�i O a�0 O c��f � F- Z r �N N � N N � O I O I O l S I O I O I O W O�p O O� � � m � � G O� � O� O� .� .� r .- r+ .� r r � y C� W 67 a! W 01 d F}- L L L L L L f- L ,. �p �p ip 'O A A A A .• '� Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q L ti r. N �'f Q r N � � -5- 1H Table i-2 REKTAL UNITS AFFORDABLE TO LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSEHOLOS Section 8 Fair Market Re�nt (FMR) Total number t�f Units Included in Survey � Number of unii:s w/rent ��iplus tenant paid utilites* iess than FMR Percent of un�its with Rent plus uti'iities. less than FMR Studio • s262 � 87 85 97 .7 UNI7 SIZE 1 gR I 26R ( 3BR Total $317 $372 �429 615 678 182 1502 500 561 30 1176 81.3 90.8 16.5 78.3 � *Average amount for tenant paid utilities as foliows: Electricity only - $10-15 All utilities - $40-50 It has t�een determined from Assessor Homestead Counts that 4,032 ren- tal units exist in Fridley. From the data in Table 1-2, it can be conclud- ed that 78.3�� of 4,032 units or 3,157 units are affordable to low and mod- erate i�ncome households. It should be pointed out that a�though the rent survey data �is relatively recent, it is already out-dated because of the rapid excaia�tion of rental rates. It is 7ike]y that even less units now can be class'ified as affordable to low and moderate income households. HOUSING ASSI:STAWCE NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME RENTER HOUSEHOLDS The estimated Housing Assistance Needs of lower income renter house- holds in Fridley are revealed in Table 1-3. This table reveals that des- pite the City's relative abundance of units affordable to low and moderate income householcis, there are still needs of lower income rental households not met in the City. TABLE 1-3 ESTIMATEO NEED OF LOWER INCOME RENTER HOUSENOIDS IN FRIDLEY Fridle Total 489 El de� 87 Fam;1y 300 �arge Famil 102 Source: Met:ropolitan Council's Estimated Housing Assistance Need and Prc>gram mix Goals for Metropolitan Areas Communities (Based on R.L. Polk and Company Data) � lI 0 1J AVERAGE RENT COMPARISON Fridley's average rents are lower than most other cortmunities in the Metro Area as revealed in a survey of average rents of Metro HRA partici- pating coamunities. 7he data, which is contained in Appendix A, shows that Fridley's average rent for an efficiency apartment is lower than 25 out of 32 other comnunities; for a one bedroom apartment is lower than 34 out of 42 c anmunities; for a two bedroom apartment is lower than 26 out of 46 communities; and for a three bedroom apartment is lower than 15 out of 30 comnunities. Four bedroom apartments were almost non-existent. It should be noted that a total of 48 comnunities were surveyed and that some comnunities did not contain any of the various bedroom units. SUPPLY OF LARGE RENTAL COMPLEXES Fridley has 17 rental complexes that are 18 units or greater. These complexes are listed in Table 1-4. If certain larger complexes converted to condominiums, it would virtually wipe out larger bedroom unit supply affordable to low and moderate income families. COSt OF SINGLE FAPIILY HOUSING According to the Multiple Listing Service, the average sales price of existing single-family homes in the NSetropolitan area has risen steadily since 1970. A$25,903 home in 1970 would cost $66,417 in 1979. By 1985, it is projected that the median price of an existing home will be $93,438.� The increasing costs combined with high �nterest rates have left many house- holds who .may never be able to afford . � a single family home. OUTt�IOVERS PROFILE There has been some studies of what tenants did after their residence was converted to condominiums• One study, entitled The Dis lacem n� actor: A Survey of Outmovers, dealt �ntirely with Twin City conversions. The results found that 73 percent of the tenants moved when their building was converted to condominiums. Fifty-four percent reportedly moved involuntarily. The majority of the tenants who moved (86°6) found a satisfactory neighborhood in which to live. Fifty-eight percent of the outmovers experienced an increase in housing costs after their move (77 percent of home buyers and 49 percent of renters). Single households constituted 44 percent of the outmovers. Almost the same proportion of households (41 percent) included a male and female adult. Seventeen percent of the households had children. Pledia� age of the head of household was 37 years. Median household income was just over $20,000. Many of the tenants (48 percent) were professionals or managers. Twenty-One percent were retired. INMOVERS PROFILE In 1980, a national study of condominium Department of Housing and Urban Development. of the condominium owners were under 36 years $20,000 and 65 percent were professionals or condominium households consisted of one perso people, and only 8 percent consisted of thre made up 36 percent of the owners. -7- conversions was performed by the The study found that 48 percent old. Their incomes were over managers. Fifty-seven percent of n, 35 percent consisted of two e or more people. Single wom�n TASLE 1-4 Large (18 or greater) Rental Comp7exes Address of Complex ;1. 5451 5th St. N.E. " 2. 5430 7th St. N.E. 3. 5460 7th St. N.E. 4. 1441 73re Ave. N.�. 5. 1619 73rd Ave. N.E. 6. 5960 80 Anna St. N.E. 7. 1200 - 1294 Cheri Lane 8. Georgetown Apts. 9. 6540 - 50 East River Rd. 10. 7805 - 7895 East River Rd. 11. 5701 Highway #65 N.E. 72. 995 Lynde Qrive N.E. 13. 460 Mississippi St. 14. 1601 N. Innsbruck Dr. N.E. 15. 630 Osborne Rd. N.E. 16. 155 - 175 Satellite Lane N.E. 17. 6111 Star Lane N.E. Total �� Number of Units 32 34 34 18 24 33 72 462 141 295 89 32 i 03 258 68 53 18 1 ,766 �� 1L Most condominium owners claimed their stay was temporary. Sixty-one percent of the owners planned to live in a differen�� type of housing after their next move. Fifty-six percent wanted a sin�le family home or a townhouse. Only 5 percent preferred rental housing. The most prevalent reason for their purchase of a condominium was cited as being economic. EFFECTS OF CONVERSIONS , . There have been many conclusions on the effects of condominium conversions. The most common effect of conversion is the loss of low and moderate income housing stock. To date there is relatively little hard data collected on the actual extent to which conversion has ero�ed the supply of affordable rental housing for middle and low income groups. In many respects, the loss of rental stock has been exaggerated since two-thirds of all buyers of converted units had been renters and thus demand for compar�ble rental units was off-set by their decision to shift into ownership status. However, the cor�mon threat in virtually every city experiencing a wave of condo cor�versions is a low rental vacancy rate reflecting a shortage of rental housing. When the vacancy rate falls below 5 percent, low and moderate income households will have difficulty finding repiacement housing within the community. Below 3 percent, relocation becomes difficult for any income household.6 A positive side of condominium conversion is while conversions have not retained a high proportion of former tenants as buyers. they have made it possible for a large number of previous renters to become owners in the same neighborhood. Conversions have not freed up many single family homes for families with children, but they do seem to have provided a viable alternative to persons wishing to change tenure status but remain in the same neighborhood.� FACTORS CONDUSIVE TO COPdVERSIONS Studies have indicated factors that have made conversions attactive and future conditions that will make some communities "ripe" for conversion. Past conversion activity was primarily suburban (74 percent).8 The areas consisted mostly of areas considered "built-up". Access to freeways and arterial highway systems were, and will continue to be, prime locational factors. In addition, areas with a strong and growing job base will make them an attractive location for conversions.9 These factors are all found in Fridley and one could probably conclude that it is "ripe" for conversion. � 1 M� CONCLUSION The City of Fridley, as a first-ring fully developed metropolitan community, is ideally located and has all of the prime indicators for the potential for conversion. The prime conversions in the surburan comnunities have been the large complexes which make up a large part of our present rental stock that is affordable to low and moderate income persons. If these conversion, in fact take place, it will put a definite strain on those persons unable to make the move to condominium form of ownership. With the removal of existing rental units and the inability of the private market to produce new rental housing, the vacancy rate will continue to fall, thus. creating difficulty for any displaced household. Although conversion has been economically popular with the property ow" er� �� and has produced an opportunity for a portion of the rental market to become first time buyers, it has not addressed the need for more housing units caused by the increasing numbers of young people forming new households. Ownership is usually not an option for these households or low income households. Con- version without construction of new units could creat'��very tight market with ..�.,..:__. _ potential side effects which could directly effect the nature__of housing within the City. The City is starting to see one effect of this tight market in the doubling up in� household in some of its single family housing stock. p S Based on this study and the numerous other reports on conversion in the metropolitan areas, the City feels that there is a need for some control on the conversion of rental units to the condominium form of ownership for the protection of our existing low and moderate income rental stock. The present number of rental units does not meet the projected needs for low and moderate income household� consequently� further reduction of these units would only magnify this problem. It is our recommendation that the City Council of the City of Fridley take the following actions: 1. That an 18 month moratorium on the conversion of rental units to condominium form of ownership be established by ordinance. 2. That during that 18 month period of time the City analyze how condo conversion can provide housing opportunities for low and moderate income households and/or existing tenants. 3. That after such analysis�the City Council take the necessary steps to effectuate the recommendations. -10- i r� REFERENCES 1. Ed Kelly, "Condo Conversion" 1/22/80 2. Thomas L. Anding and Rebecca Smith, Twin City Conversion, The Displacement � Factor: A Survey of Outmovers. CURA 81-7 .3. Barbara Lukermaa, "Twin City Conversions of the Real Estate Kind',', Cura Re orter (July 1981):5 4. Lukerman : p.5 5. Daniel Lauber, "Condominium Conversions - The Number Prompt Controls to Protect the P00% and Elderly", Journal of Housing (April 1980:204 6. Lauber, p.204 _ 7. Barbara Lukerman and Milo Pinkerton, Twin City Conversions. The Condominium Market: Surveys of Activi�, Developers and Buyers. p. 50 8. Lukerman and Pinkerton, p. 3 9. Metropolitan Countil, If The Twin Cities Housin Market Flas Worked So t�Jell 4Jhy Is Everyone Worried? June 1981 Publication No. 19-81-33: p. 16 ' Appendix A METRO HRtatt PARTICIPATING CON�![JNITIES EFFICIENCY BEDROOM MARKET — AVERAGE RENTS June 1981 I - �� • r: , � � I }!�\ r ;,�' cas �eeka /a�ors {lain� ��oo�� ,oc.� araotl�s ear+c Qi+s4l.ta CL�oau��o � Culu � Coluabii Hd{his ''. Caon 3aPidr ;accap Cron CrY�tal Edlas Ese�l�lor ialeon tsYCdu Fridl�� _ ;aldea �all�! aooic•^• U�a`cos �lctl� Caaada Loc{ �� .yap l�wod :41ea�conlu :1o�md .youada viw y�v 3rltbto6 Vev 900� M�vpOtt :lorsh St. Taul Oal�dal� y��o u�esi.ia ,bbbin�dale ?cprs to�a�il1� se. Aacaoe7 S[. loaL:ir1W St. !aul !act Shot�+iN SOr_at La�c. 'uk sprin` lart Sc:ll�ac�c 'tawus 3�i=ocs 7Letoria �ac�nsa 9�7:aca :Tl:a 3��[ �c� iiO�:Yl7 aoeati or :rza .�— ie s 2 �� 2 S 6 6 _ ' % I7 9� :ii �� 7 �� :� 9 � 1 :S S ) 1 l� 7I s� 1 :7 2 :� 17 i esMr ��acc sieo-ie� �— sie�—ns sias—x�o 51:0-t93 fl'_0-3t3 5330-)6! f225-250 S20S-710 siio—:ss S19S-i95 s::az�o 5263-725 S29S-]70 S20S-275 s:�a-tes ;190-2=9 5160-I]0 si�o-iee S:OS-2'•. 3195-2lD i2�0-260 .vaucs ssss sia� .�-- StS2 s:�� 5210 5215 illb f2I? fISO 5190 37G! 5236 5195 st:� siee S22! f712 331] S:SS 72�9 sz�� ;200 3300 5::0 f1B9 sts; 5190 S2o2 SI%S i:�� S:'2 3:75 5::� e:!D � � 10 � METRO HRA PARTICIPATING COMMUNITIES '. ONE BEDROOM MARKET - AVERAGE RENTS June 1981 '�• I � `� � CLZ !UlSCl 01 C�I:S 7L"1T iANGE �Yl�GL tLifr ' � aeolu l96 S130-�SO f�00 layport . il_0-i60 f1S2 llaiw :02 i:fi0.2'0 3:69 lroo�clye C�otar 625 f190-]:0 5267 ' lreo's17�n lark :]10 523-770 f276 p��aplla l0 52:5-250 f2�.: paa6a��a !9 32:5-)1S 4295 py� 10; 5190-1J0 5266_ Cal:�oia i[ai{E[f :S4 51:0-:lS S2'6 Cooe iLpidr S! 5�00-�OS � s2�� Cotsap Gro�n � �� Cr��cal :7� 3213•)06 329� Ldins !0/ 5700--90 ScSO fseeUior :i� 5:-0-730 sZ�� Falcoa 9�iRIICf :! 52:0-2:0 SI<S .1i �rid2a7 747 i190-120 5261 �r :ol:�n 7a11�� ::6 S2.']-29! 52�9 BoPkia� ::l7 S1:J-J!S S:lO :uc-n`con — �� lctle �.��^� •6 31?0-710 f27D ;ao� Ly,� 21 3:_Sw3J 5296 >�+Ol��ood :32 S2c5-)10 5276 :yza�coo+u !3� 3)I2-39S i752 �� ,M 5:00-393 §7:S !la:ads 71w i�7 � 52:�-]:S 5=% ::�v 3riihcoo 297 i190-]9� 37:6 :iw 9ep� S97 5::0-]cS i246 ':erpots 65 31C0-26J 3:+5 �orce sc. zaul sa 5:::-:�s s::t Juaal� :1S f265 Os�eo :�7 SI'!-i9S 5::� iie:+fi�ld :E6! 51li•l90 5:96 . toeEir.sdal� iTl a:05-753 32e7 ?o��ts iS flBS-22S i21: Lisevi'..'.� !69 3:::-7:0 ' 32!] St. aecnoo7 :?p i:1J-)10 5:9e 5130 Sc. 3onitse:w it. 7au1 Yaru — �` !2!0 $Loreriw �� Spr_ai �� taslc ;19 3:"0-]:9 S:l6 Spr•st •'ars :]s i•!S_]•S 57:1 Scil:+ac�r —"-- :'aer.ua 3ei;ncs .a '-'.!S S:l1 asesar:a � �accua �� J��:att :�0 i:.J-:•0 371: :tG:a leac :.�c� i�� ::5i- - i:5= :ooc�un .'h ::0-.,� .... 1P METRO HRA PARTICIPATING COMMLJNITIES , TWO BEDROOM MARKET - AVERAGE RENTS JUNE 1981 � � � V L� � C'�Y! 'JL^3Q Ol ::IISS Lc`7: LtiGs ►t•.3�GL fL:S Yofu :!� 5:=0-)TO i:lD 7�YPOrt IO 5:�0-]00 3:=: llale� �p 3:�5-1)t 37:0 /rooklyu Caac�c :%3 f16S-+7! ;�32 /raoilya lark 1257 S1SD+S0 3�2= c�+�� : s:ca-:.00 stes man.�L�u ap 3:5S-�7S 5�79 aura aoe si�o-aso s:�: Cai�noi. 9�i{!�u t:9 si;S�:�o s77s Cxn iapid� 16� S:SS-)60 3712 Cacup Crov� '� :rf�cal 1!9 5700-363 t:S2 CQL�a 120 fS70�i60 3S0! snlsaer !1 S�OO�S� s�"� F�2:on H�i�b[s 2 i26S tna2�7r :�D s2:o-�to 3]2� WiGu 7a11�! S2 370B-77S 3�17 goP�ys 96L i1dS»IS i761 i:15 „e�cin{coo - utcs. c,o,a. 9� atoa��s ;�:s �e= �k. sa s7�c_css s.tl :iplewod :SS 5:90-760 5777 :.L^��cvet� 17� 3755«LS i�S: yo,ma 14 S:CO-�95 stOt �aueda VLwr 7]I 51751i30 S�"� v�v lr::etos :lr 3:.0-r.SO 3?62 Yw 3oP• %0! 3:30-+06 S]26 9�woR ;0� ;21C-S90 32�� vor:� 3c. taul 13 3275-7�7 S:9a Jacdsl� i0 5770 J��o Ii0 i210-)�0 3�09 dlc�fi�id eg� 5250-.d0 576d inootnsdal� 73 52:0-+15 57ST �q�d lt S2!0-7:5 3:52 tos��n12� S�= S:6S-rAS • 3�71 St. .�nc6oe) :�� S:!0-)IS 3767 St. 3cextacSU� S S2S�-29S 3a7� f200 it. 7au1 7art � Shos�vi�v :Si S]2:-.00 S]67 ;oc.,� •yc� 7ask 1:6 3710-I6! ;»� Svl1�� tari :1 3J30-545 3L]1 ' ic:::vat�r � 'a1na3! d�ljat� yb i7:0-7:3 3�2: Yle:ora ' 5:�0-:65 ;�wO s:sa�:5 '=�9 �aconla •• �avsaca ;•� 5:=:-•JO 5769 . •.r,:. n..: �. :.a ::oc-,as ;:cu � :oo.:un :52 i::S-;9' .... 1� �� V � `,/ METRO HR.A PARTICIPATING COI�IUNITIES THREE BEDROOM MARKET - AVERAGE RENTS JUNE 1981 C2SS 9C:�� 01 77I3 �LVY �NGE APl7l�Gt L`'Y! �eoca ) S7;S-1C0 3'!S l�7Vor[ i S)'� ]lat�� 1 s"90 frooicl'R Gac�r :7 5;90-i00 f:67 lnelclye lata 29 5259-�;0 f]�! LamPlla 6 SJ:�-:!0 s��• p�nnu��s — � 6ulu :1 f267-:00 s��' �.olusola °a1Reu I 57�.0-SIS SS2! Coon laa1G� � Cecta6� �roti '� C:�scal ! S7lS-SO f�ll L�� 7 S76S-1000 S6S0 6tNLiet laleen 9�ithu � �� trldl�l !62 f�]S-9S 3i1: Wld�a 9aJ1ef �� 9opkias i2 S2lS-i6S fLW ��.+ntcw SO S:SO ucsl. Cae+a+ — �w` � 1 . S:7S ">SOo !Sap Lwood ' YLw�cooY� 30 i::0-i20 531+ 71ownG -� — ,�„ad a�N s75s-es scts tw lrieetw t! Sc2!-.SO ft72 �ev 900� :1 i750-315 5:�0 V�rport 2 i::0-��0 SJ6S !tar:� St. !wl I 3650 Judait '� Dss�o � i1c�Ll�ld yj i�:0-S10 3�70 3o1.bL.saa1� �� tc{�r■ 2 5200-`OS s�2 f720 lo��rt:l� 2 Sc. aaceoe� 9 l715 5250 St. Doni!aeius 3 S[. 7au1 !�s1c -� Sl�or�n�v ) •:63 Spde` �ak� ?arlc 37::')95 37i0 � $p['S�f iask � — -- St11S+�qr '� ^aacais 3•S:acs � - -- 71:coria — "l�eoal� �� — -- S __ a�JO .�y_�ca :LS:• 3ear �:.� �� — -- i-e: ��caDUn -� _--' 1R � V METRO HRA PARTICIPATING COMMUNITIES FOIJ$ BEDROOM MARRET - AVERAGE RENTS ,TTJI�TE 1981 CIS' W!S[i oF CxITS tlYt Ly::L Av�_',tAG2 1LtR ,�uaca la7ryorC �� alua. � lreoklyn Gaur 1 i:00 - )�oealya fstt daeplia � Cyaensss�a � — CasYa �.otumsa 3�S�bu ? 3775-^-a0 >S2! Cooa lspiG �� Cocti�� :cov� — � Cr7�ca1 —� Edlaa � scalsior � Taleoe :�1{ecs � *ridl�� — W1G�a 7a1:�1 � �� Moplcias -� _� ...,..tca � � LStt:• Canada � *�e[ L+lu -- !lapl�wod " �— Y1�.�toeka "� Yymd �� :OLL6Ga �%�lY �� •- 9�v 3r:46[oa —� _— V�v Hop• � YNpoTC � AOt:2 iC. �� •- Oaiulti� �� , ^A��O � tl WlS�ld � ioDOlesdal� � -- 3ofars las�vi:.l• Sc. mcr.osr � :c, lool:aclua . Sc. ?��+1 7art —� �� Sboc��ri�v � _— Sprin{ Laa� ?act — — iDr:at ?arY -- w S[SL`wur — 'aotu.ta ?�1=acs — _ ^lccari• �,cenu — — — ��•:aca � '�� ;Ti:e ��t �� _._-- '� :o.wour• -----' _^ iS TME DATE FROM SUBJECT OF DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS zoa # s2-oi TO 2 _� MEMOR AN DUM � ACTIONI INFO. Tl�is rezoning request is the second one submitted by W.G. Doty and Gary Ao Wellman. Last year, they attemp�ed to rezone the parcel to R-3 and then withdrew the request 6ased upon the neighborhood objections at the Planning Commission meeting. This request suggests rezoning the parcel of land from M-1 (light industrial) to R-2 (2-family dwellings�. Incorporated in the proposal is a plan to cons- truct a single family residence adjacent to the single family residence on Starlite Boulevard, to serve as a zoning buffer; and to construct seven double bungalows on the remainder of the property. At the Planning Commission meeting, two major objections were voiced by the local residents -- that of sanitary sewer problems, and devaluation of pro- perty. We have checked our records and have found no calls or problems in this area, back to 1977. As a matter of fact, this sanitary sewer line in this area is the most trouble-free line that we have in the City. Our Assess- i_ng Department has indlcated that a two-fami1y dwelling zoning in this area is definitely better than apartments, corrnnnercial or industrial zoning in relation to single family property values. The Planning Cormission has recommended denial of rezoning request #ZOA 82-01, due to �he existing density and traffic problems. JGF:ijk PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL �OTICE is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of:the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday, htarch 22, 1982 in the Councii Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: ' Consideration of a Retoning Request, ZOA #82-01, by W. G. Doty and Gary A. Wellman, to rezone the following c�escribed parcels from t�-1 (li ht industrial areas), to R-2 (two family dwelling areas�;'� That part of Biocks 8 and 9, Lowell Addition, lying South of the tJorth line of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, extended in a Westerly direction fo the West boundary of said Block 8, and lying Westerly of the plat of Sylvan Nill� Plat 8, together with the Easterly one-half of vacated Eim Street, and That part of Lots i and 2, Block 7, lowell Addition to Fridley Park, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of the piat of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, together with the Westerly half of vacated Elm Street. All lying in the South half of Section 15, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesoia. Generally located South of Mississippi Street N.E. East of the Burlington Northern right-of-way. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to the above matter will be heard at this meeting. WILLIAM J. NEE MAY OR Publish: March 3, 1982 �1arch � 0, 1982 2A � COON R�PIDS I ♦ N � > �(.OL�Q Ti o17 --� � :� �� ___ , �n�l;� � '„+- � �. .�,.�. < ,.� � � _.. � �.�. � ANOKA ca I. � �::� NEI� ►IN C0. 1� � MINNEA►OLIS SPIMNG L�I(E PMK ej (.o� 3 W � y 111� � �� ►`�i� � � 3, € � : � � s � �i ��.� ; ,...a�� ;...:.., �°� j4_ � ��wo�Rwtn �� ' �� :��m.�: � p �K � �� -�� ..�..�,.. eK��::. nn��--� � ' u.s...eae n r r ��---� s; COLUMBIA � C MEIGM?S STREET MA.P-CITY OF FRI DLEY L` � 18 I i � � � 1 � � ?H!S IS A COA�'�°�i-ATI�N C�F RECORDS �`+5 THEY APPEAR 1N 7HE ANOKA COUNTY OFFtCES AF�cC71NC TH� AQFA SHO`.'ti/t`+• ?Hf� +�P.A�'!I,'�1G IS TO B� ?,'::�EJ Ot�lLY FOR REFERFI�.'CE PURPOS-S AND 7HE COUPJ- Ty tS NO7 RES�'ONSIBLE FOR AN'f IN- ACCURACIES NERE?N CONTAINED. � E.V4 COO�NER � �EC. l� � --T•---� ' � , ST , ^ . �T�} 7�'j , : f-�z _ _ _ � ��,,.�,��..r a .;:,.v �, v�«�� -- •.�ix.a.�_,a�rE.�i.�=� " , .f� ( ' ''��', �os8 7 t Sq 3 2/° , ___ . ____ �C,. Zo. ,. 2� . . .. �z�, 1 W, o . . �. �.zs -� 3 ��> � j :-%'i! ^ � �z..>-* 1"J � - ? i�i. /3J 6�' ~ lo.sl �/y�. Q .. . j ��.:. I � 7-i� . � S --- �° � � . � ��ITIp� 6 � ' � � _ !�� ' / � � � . ..� � za � ., 8 ~� '� � - -- - -- - . _. . �" ; : r 9 �� _ .�6 �' 7 ; ^ ' ��i°r;,- f ' ,o �--_ _ -_�_ _ ; � �;�, : „ � � A N : � �-- O ,, _ _ _� _ z S _,,,� � // 'O � --- -- � , �.��I � � � 'z � Q �� 9 z � o �t � � A T g t '3 � Ot i �z '"� p: zo _- _;__z P` �s ; � � ,�_--- ; ; � zi z z2 � . � � .% . is ; i � ' A�1 E � � � ; r !�., � ; � �; WAY � � � , i 1� n � �� . .8. i � �.. 3 z� i; • � , ,, � �. - „ �� . iG i,ti t �' I ' 1'g � G zi z3 :�i; z� ; � 4 �.�� ;' ' � ' � i � .. ' o! � ; o' WAY ° � � � h � .o � �,,� . ao . �v.t � � i\ �' G � 3 Z� / ` � ?,�i � a:e ��-�-�►- '�: ia � � � S' `� e s�7�L+ l7E � .� �� . � � ,� 1 � LANE P� , 4 � 7 , .. 3 � `� ~ ,l�- _--�"� - � : �� . � ��. . 2 � �, � � ► ! 19 ,� I t .� � � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Harris asked Mr. Boardman to contact Mr. Anderson and inform him of the ,P1 anni ng Corr�ni ssi on's acti on. � 3. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING RE UEST, ZOA #82-01, SY W. G. DOTY�AND GARY A: WELLNER: Rezone t e fo ow�ng escribe parce s from -(light in ustria areas) to R-2 (two family dwelling areas),(except if this area is platted, 1 lot will be R-1): That part of Blocks 8 and 9, Lowell Addition, lying South of the North line of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, extended in a Westerly direction to the West boundary of said Block 8, and lying Westerly of the plat of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, together with the Easterly one-half of vacated Elm Street, and that part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, Lowell Addition to Fridley Park, lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of the plat of Sylvan Hills Plat 8, together with the Westerly half of vacated Elm Street, generally located South of Mississippi Street N.E., East of the Burlington Northern right-of-way. MOTIDN BY MR. SVANDA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA #82-01 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED TXE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:50 P.M. Mr. Boardman stated that Mr. Doty and Mr. Wellner originally brought a rezoning request before the Planning Commission eariy in 1981. At that time, the proposal was for a rezoning from M-1 (light industrial} to R-3 (general multiple dwellings). Also included in that rezoning request was a street vacation. Because of neighborhood opposition to R-3, Mr. Doty withdrew the rezoning request, so it did not go to City Council. However, the street vacation was approved by City Council. Mr. Boardman stated this proposal was for rezoning from M-1 to R-2 (two family dwelling areas) and that a small portion be rezoned R-1. This would have to be determined through the plat, and at some point in time, they will have to get both the platting and zoning together before it goes to City Council for final approval. Right now, they cannot split the land as far as �he actual legal description on the zoning; however, the zoning issue is the key issue as to whether this project will go or not go. For that reason, Mr. Ooty has not applied for a plat and is submitting only a rezoning. He asked Mr. Doty to explain his plans for development. Mr. Doty stated this property is bounded on the west by the railroad tracks, is bounded on the north by light industrial, and is bounded on the east by multiple residential. In an attempt to get along with the people, they made the concession to make an R-1 adjacent to the one R-1 property this property abuts. He stated the zoning is presently light industrial. He and Mr. Wellner felt M-1 was not the proper use for the property in that location because of the residential neighborhood. They felt that with apartment complexes, manufacturing, and industrial that R-1 was also not a proper use for the land. For that reason, they came up with what they thought was a realistic compromise--R-2 zoning. 2E PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 24 1982 PAGE 4 Mr. Wellner stated that Mr. Doty has expressed his thoughts. and he is in support of this proposal. Mr: Michael Larson, 6390 Starlite Blvd., stated he wanted to point out that the drawing Mr. Doty had brought to the meeting was the first time the neighborhood had seen it. He stated his R-1 property was most affected by this change in zoning. He stated he and his neighbors have a number of concerns, and he sub- mitted the following letter to the Planning Commission members: The neighbors of the Sylvan Hills area most directly impacted by the proposed rezoning, are unanimously supportive of either maintaining the current M-1 zoning or upgradinq the zoning to R-1. We cannot conceive of an instance where we would approve of an R-2 zoning for this parcel! Some of the reasons for our concerns are as follows: ��EIGNBORHOOD INCOMPATIBILITY... Our neighborhood is almost entirely single family homes with the exception of the apartments on Satellite Lane. W� roud of our homes. We work hard to maintain a pleasant appearance a��er! eEY maintain the value of our homes. TRAFFIC b SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS... Satellite Lane is a narrow road and k�e have had to restrict parking to avoid accidents and assure the safet of our children. The proposed re2oning could allow 7 duplex structures or living units. If each of those units averaaes 1 and i/2 cars, Lhere would be 21 cars to park in an area comprised of a very short cul-de-sac and 14 driveways! The additional traffic would increase the traffic risks to an unreasonable level. IMPACT ON HOME VALUES... Whatever incremental rofits would accrue to the developer by obtaining R-2 zoning would besmore��,than offset b the reduction in the value of our homes. lJe are convince`�c Tia� eve opment un er - cou e pro � a e to the developer. Consider the new construction of an impressive single-family home at 6380 Starlite Blvd. as proof of the viability of our area. CURRENT ZONIN6 RESTRICTIONS... We see little risk in maintainin the M-1 zoning because this property is e ss en �a y Ta'na=loc e �'"r`om an in us rial development viewpoint. Even if some industrial development were pursued, we feel confident it may be preferential to R-2 development. THE LACK OF CONCERN FOR OUR OPINIONS... At no time has the developer contacted neiohbors to discuss his thoughts and perspective. Apparently they feel they should be allowed to develop their property as they see fit to do so! The fact that the didn't do their hor�ework prior to purchase of the property doesn mean we ave o surren er our home values to their ineptitude. 2F PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGi FEBRUARY 24 � 1982 PAGE 5 WE UESTION THEIR REAL INTENT... Are they seeking R-2 zoning knowing our ne�g or oo wi o �ec . Do they intend to then "compromise" for R-1 with alot of variances attached? Having someone propose specific construction of a planned development is one thin�. Having someone seek a change in zoning so they can sell individual lots to individual builders, is an entirely different risk. In summary, WE REQUEST AND DEMAND THAT THE REQUEST FOR R-2 ZONING BE DENIED to PRESERVE OUR EIGHBORHOOD, MAINTAIN OUR PROPERTY VALUES, A�p ASSURE THE SAFE YT OF UR �I�� . / ,v � Mr. Bill Zurbey, 145 Sylvan Lane, stated he has lived in this neighborhood for 19 years. Quite a few years ago, they had a sewer problem in this neighborhood, and he wondered if anyone had done any research as to whether the current sewer system would handle duplexes. Mr. Boardman stated the sewer capacity was checked when Mr. Doty had applied for the rezoning to R-3. At that time, the City Engineering Dept, felt there was adequate sewer capacity for that type of development. Mr.Robert Olson, RAO Manufacturing, stated he was at the meeting for information, and not to approve or disapprove the proposal. He stated he understood that with the development of the property to R-2, it would increase RAO's setback to 50 ft. He stated they are now 50 ft. from the back line so there were no problems with that. He wanted to know if there were any other restrictions that would restrict the possible use of their property because of this development. Mr. Boardman stated that besides the setback requirement, there are screening requirements for loading areas. Mr. Olson stated one concern he had would be the grading required to put in these units. RAO's property is quite a bit higher than Satellite Lane. If the developer would have to dig out to lower all the units to the level of Satellite Lane, there could be quite a drop. He stated if there were no other major changes, he would have no objection to this development. Ms. Judy Kidder, 6360 Starlite Blvd., stated she supported everything Mr. Larson had said. He has done an excellent job in organizing the neighborhood as can be seen by the number of people who turned out for the meeting. She stated the r►eighborhood sincerely believes this property could be developed into R-1 and it would be the best solution for both parties. 2G PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, ]982 PAGE 6 Mr. Larson stated one of the reasons they are not concerned with the property being zoned light industrial is because they benefit from RAO Manufacturing, which is probably one of the neatest buildings, from an industrial standpoint, in Fridley, or maybe in the Twin Cities. As a homeowner, he appreciated that and wished alt industrial property was maintained as well. � Mr. Doty stated he understood the neighbors' feeling and was not unsympathetic to the fact that no one wants a multiple dweiling bui7t in his/her R-1 neighbor- hood. In his 20 years of real estate, he has yet to find or witness an R-1 neighborhood that was in favor of a multiple residential adjacent to it. However, he hoped they could allay some of the neighborhood's fears. Mr. Doty stated it is not feasible or likely that anyone is going to build a double bungalow for under $120,000. He stated they have submitted some various . plans as to what the structures might look like. He stated they are very nice units. He siated they cannot at this time make a commitment to build those units on those lots because of today's interest rates. FHA interest rates are 16��. Financing on double bungalows would dictate they be sold to owner occupants. Mr. Doty stated they talked to Mr, Robert Olson about a year ago as far as industrial for this property. They talked about buying some property and coming in along the south side of RAO, but they discovered this was not feasible. They talked about the possibility of selling the iand to RAO because of neighbor- hood opposition, but RAO felt they had sufficient land for further expansion and would not need this additional land. Mr. Doty�stated the property is presently zoned M-1. They are requesting a down- zoning. He is not so certain that a plan must have neighborhood approval, and he is not so certain that a neighborhood ca-n�emand what a private property owner does with his land as long as it is within the proper zoning requirements. Again, he wanted to emphasize that this land is M-1, it is bordered by the rail- road tracks, light industrial, and R-3 Multiple housing. They are requesting an R-2 zoning. Ms. Gabel stated Mr. Larson had made the statement about the possibility of the individual lots being sold and developed by individual builders. Would that happen or did Mr. Doty and Mr. Wellner plan to develop all of it themselves? Mr. Wellner stated it was their original intention to buy the property and develop it themselves. If the economy is such that they can develop it themselves, that is what they will do; however, they cannot guarantee that. Ms. Judy Kidder stated people have lived in their neighborhood for years. They feel that even with duplexes, there will be a constant turnover of tenants-- even in the one-half. Right now, they do not get that constant change in residents, and they do not feel it is fair to change the character of their neighborhood so much. ?. N PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 1982 PAGE 7 Mr. Larson stated he felt it was his and the neighborhood's concern that these lots will be haphazardly sold off to individual bui7ders. He stated Mr. Doty sf�owed nice drawings of prospective structures, but that doesn't,mean anything unless it is tied in with the rezoning. Again, he spoke for the neighbors when he said they are �remendously upset about this and heartily recommend the Planning Commission reject the rezoning. Mr. Frank Liebl stated he sympathized with Mr. Doty. Mr. Doty has a right to develop his property, but not at the neighborhood's expense. He stated there is already too much traffic. Because of the multiple residential north of Satellite, there is too much density in that area right now. He stated there are also definite sewer problems in that area, and Staff should look into this problem. Mr. Wellner stated he wanted to speak as a present homeowner who has property adjacent to duplexes. His property is on Sunrise Drive, and Star Lane has all duplexes on one side of the street. He in no way thought those duplexes depreciated the value of his home, because the property owners keep them in nice condition. He has lived for many years next to duplexes. He does not have the noise problems the neighborhood is alluding to, he does not have any more traffic than living next to a single family home with 2-3-4 cars. He did not think the traffic argument was as strong as the neighborhood would like to make it, and he did not think they could make the generalization that duplexes would devalue their properties. He stated they could do some market analysis that would show this was not necessarily the case. Mr. Dennis Johnson, 6336 Starlite Blvd., stated he lives on the west side of Starlite Blvd., and their children like to play at Sylvan Park. They have to cross the street to get to the park. Starlite is almost an extension of Main Street and carries a lot of traffic, much of which is above the speed limit, and the street is not safe for children. He would like to keep the traffi,c on their street at a minimum, and he felt construction of single family homes was a way to keep that traffic at a minimum. Mr. Saba stated that regarding the issue of the care of double bungalows, he has seen some excellent double bungalows, and he has seen some very bad double bungalows. He stated where neighborhoods are kept up, the double bungalows are usually kept up also, but as a neighborhood deteriorates, so da the multiple dwellings. He stated that at today's costs, there are some pretty nice double bungalows being built. He liked the effort Mr. Doty had made to put a buffer between the double bungalows and the single family residential. He stated he felt R-2 was a fair compromise. He thought they should also consider the sewage problem that has been brought up, and the City owes the neighborhood an answer to that concern. He did not know if they could address the rezoning issue at this meeting without an answer to the sewage problem. Mr. Boardman stated he would do some more checking into the sewer problems to see if there are any solutions to the problem. He stated he had discussed the sewer capacity with the Engineering Dept. for R-3, and they had indicated the sewer capacity was adequate for R-3. 2I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 1982 PAGE 8 Ms. Catherine Scherven, 131 Sylvan Lane N.E., stated she does not object to double bungalows, because she and her husband are thinking about buying one. But, she did not think this area was a good area for double bunga7ows, because of the traffic situation and the water situation. She stated that whenever there is a rain, their streei runs like a river. "The water comes down Starlite and down Sylvan towards the park. With more run-off from a cul-de-sac, the water situation would be even worse. Ms. Gabel stated she would like the Planning Commission to know more about the sewer capacity before m�cing a decision, and she would like to see this item tabled. _ Mr. Wellner stated he and Mr. Doty are not asking �or any platting at the present time, and it would seem to him that answers to the sewer objections could be found out between now and the time they would come forth with a plat. At that time, the City could determine whether or not the sewer capacity was adequate for the development. All they are asking for now is a rezoning, and it would seem to him that the City would have control as to whether the development could be handied by the utilities at that time. He did think it was a question that should be answered, but he was not at all certain the sewer issue should dictate approval or disapproval of the rezoning request. Mr. Oquist stated he agreed with Mr. Wellner. If there is a sewer problem, there will be one whether it is an R-2 development or an R-] development. The sewer question has nothing to do with the rezoning. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY 1�i. OQUIST, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA #82-01 BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELLNER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN XARRIS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:05 P.M. Mr. Oquist stated he did not necessarily agree that this rezoning request should be tabied. He stated he has always argued for the right of the owner of the property to be able to develop the property within reason. He felt there was going to be a sewer problem no matter what kind of development went in. But, because of the density already in the area with the multiple dweliings and the existing traffic problems, he would have to vote against the rezoning. Ms. Gabel stated there are so many other things that could be developed on this property under the current zoning, which could generate a whole different kind of traffic for that residential street. That bothered her in terms of leaving the zoning M-1. However, she agreed the density was probably has high as it should be and would be inclined ta vote against the rezoning. Mr. Kondrick stated he shared Mr. Oquist's point of view on density. He would like to see the area better handled with single family residential. 2J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 1982 PAGE 9 MOTIDN BY 1�2. OQUIST� SECONDED BY lIQ�. KONDRICK� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THE DENIAL OF REZONING REQUEST ZOA #82-DI BY W. G. DOTY AND GARY A. WELZNER TO REZONE THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEZS FROM M-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AREAS)� TO R!-2 (TWO FAMILY DWELLING AREAS)� (EXCEPT IF THIS AREA IS PLATTED 1 LOT WILL BE R-1): TNAT PART OF BLOCICS 8 AND 9� LOWELL ADDITION� LYING SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SYLVAN XILLS PLAT 8� EXTENDED IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID BLOCK 8� AND LYING WESTERLY OF TXE PLAT OF SYLVAN NILLS PLAT 8� TOGETXER WITH THE EASTERLY ONE-HALF OF VACATED ELM STREET� AND TXAT PART OF LO'PS 1 AND 2� BLOCK 7� LOWELL ADDITION TD FRIDLEY PARK� LYING SOUTXERLY OF THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTN LINE OF THE PLAT OF SYLVAN FIILLS PLAT 8� TOGETHER WITH THE WESTERLY HALF OF .VACATED ELM STREET� GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTX OF MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E., EAST OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY� FOR TNE FOLLOWING REASONS: . 1. EXISTING DENSITY 2. TRAFFIC PROBLEMS � Mr. Harris asked Mr. Doty if he would like the Planning Commission to vote on the motion or did he wish to withdraw his request? Mr. Doty stated he would like the Planning Commission to vote on the rezoning request. UPON A VOICE VOTE� OpUIST� SVANDA, KONDRICK� SABA� AND GABEL VOTING AYE, HARRIS ABSTAINING� CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Harris stated that ZOA #82-01 was recommended to City Council for denial and would go to City Council on March 22. Chairman Harris declared a ten-minute recess at 9:15 p.m. 4.� RECEIVE FEBRUARY 1, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: � MOTION MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECEIVE THE FEBRUARY 1� 1982� HOUSING & R VELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� LL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE JANUARY 26, 198�,APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY M KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE JANUARY 26� 1982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRMAN I�AgRIS DECLARED THE 1NOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. � 6. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 2, 1982, PARKS & RECREATION COMMI�SION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY 1�II2. SABA� TO RECEIVE THE FEBRUiARY 2� 1982� PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES. ! UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRMAN HARRIS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. TME CITY OF �ou��ni� and RED�V�LOPM�NT AUTMOi�ITY FRID FROM EXECU'i1VE QIRECTOR DATE March 17. 1982 SUBJECT Action by HRA on Cheryl Nybo "Right of Development" John Flora MEMORAN[7U TO MEMO NO. #82-20 3 ACTION INFO X The Housing Authority, at their meeting on March 11, 1982, agreed to continue the "Right of Development" for Cheryl Nybo until their April 8th meeting subject to the following actions: 1. Appraisal be done on the property by the HRA. 2. An agreement be worked out between Mr. Burandt and the HRA on the purchase of the property. 3. That the HRA take an op��on on the property, secured by Ms. Nybo, for 60 days from the date of the execution of the option agreement. This action was agreeable to both Mr. Burandt and Ms. Nybo and will be brought back to the HRA on Apri] 8, 1982 for Contract approval. We have started the appraisals on Mr. Burandt's property and expect to start negotiation by next week. This action will allow Ms. Nybo an opportunity to attempt to get a lower interest rate on construction money, and will provide Mr. Burandt with a firm purchase document with option money in case the option is not fulfilled. JLB/de 3A • �,� � �. �. , � AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND T8E CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF � FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MARING A CHANGE IN ZONING • DISTRICTS. � The Council of the City of Fridley do ordain as follows: S�CTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SnCTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and clescribed as: _ Part of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25 (Parcel 1100) lying in the South Half of Section 24, T-3Q, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoried District known as C.E�1 (general offioe and limited i�usiness). SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show saic� tract or area to be rezoned fram Zoned District i�3 (general multiple family dwellings) to C1�1 (general offioe and limited businessj. PASSED AI�ID ADOPTID BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DsAY OF , 1981. ZQP, #80-02 WILLIAM J. NEE — MAYOR ATl'FST : SIDNEY C. INMAN — CITY CLERK Public Hearing: Sept�nber 15, 1980 Reopened Public Hearing: May 4, 1981 First Reading: Qc -to r� Q,, LAS� Second Reading: Publish: ; F. r � / ` N coon �..�oa � � J � .�.,� , .��,��, M � � �� ll if �G�G�,• � 1 ; . � - ,.�.. � � ` ` �'� �' "t' � .�y,�., �,.�...» . ��L � i�' � 1�" � �� M J� z �(� � �h� �� L ... ,4i r, ... �.,: i�«».. �'/�q� �-- �� - �i��' � � P' i '�ry`� � ; ��j_.. � _ �MOK• CO +1 ��. nN co. 17J�i , � fMtM�MLIS 3B � `' �' - � �� - 0 �. s Z/ fj�.��4in c� s►��Ni ��c rWnc ��I r� .S .� :� l �� u'�n � �I a�?R �� TIrI �� o�hw c�� .,�� > i: a...i. n. � t:.0 �r :�y �"zlL`._..i.t� � i .wam�s � L` � �'��. � ... � . . � - , ��'��`� `"'i�'� � .,�K �,. , c: : � , � � 4� _ i.- � « �. �.,� .�.. �,.. / —� �� !-�� :3�` , �..«.:.eos n r a. 6S Q;� fl� I�� COIUM&1 � C MEIGMT$ . STREET Ir,�A.P-CITY OF FRI DLEY O �333 6,666 . - - J�' i .------ ._ _ . .:. ._. . _ •� . �.:_�.... �' � � �/ a�- o a- 3 C d�,, . I �9� o , � � I�. � , . { G��//��[� . , 1 �•��" * ' w�� (�� . / - "� � � ��f. d � .'.-f.• '�l i' � � /i � / .r �r i� . �" , �.; !o t ' ` / �'i+� p..;. / - • �'e. , . � � �. % ;i �� ,�,.ti tf i JI I 7I � K !i �I �t� � tl .1 • tt r�y' � � � '�t' _ : •�� .i ��1�•�~��\/'/+niu• . '' •. �p �1l �.1._ �.��»•..` j � .lf1 .;� � Jh, , �'i''i y�_ ,•.. J �'�� (e�l ,, R ''.'• ,.', :,a��..��. '� n.� �_ :�o i� /�" � %l Y 101 � ; .',•' - . �Y �� + ��•� �� f � c� C� J p� . '� w '.r••fA•f. �LL�\ •I � i��^'' 1�'� '„ � •�.7'Id ••77;Y� "•`', �t �Q�� ('�r� � '�it . �. ..... � \ n_ .�__ (.�. =- • 1� ,.:. s.�t: �,i , �91i �' / r�n �',�'�( r : X �f $� 77 j 1. . / � j f, � y � r. �ish t!•. Jf � �,. � (.� � ' / �'�,�'Tif� � 'l.i�s/Ei�' .5/11 �M�' ;' 4. ^ "� .: :\ 3'� ��r� ��.�� 7.71 ��d� d , I��.;, iVa� ! % ; � z('i'�� , � �`r� . � M -�-- ru �_ � C. , n; f/J �'��JNI�. �Lf' . `'if : �j��c� i 1� . ,�y � � Ni ,'r t . '. / A/.�✓rrc�:.�t (�1 73� •'�:i � "s •�7%��: ~��5 �� i � _ _ `. �— . __ ...yfi) � . � l . r� . � � ,�t Y��/,o� ,b , � � I'/1 i f _� ti . 9�----:� 2� ��' :��',-� � �� ' �``�`.-- .� . � � 55 �' � :o'� �� • �;�� a �:970" ;.,;.� ,: � n. x �o io � � � � ��.,�� "irs,_ �s- —0 ��' , �0,�;,' ,�930• �'�90I.14o0 �I 20:�,^� 1�A� ��. . (� J t�,`' , � : - -� •�b_; ; 9 ti',p ,� =+I,'+ : u ..13 a s c � c s �r.�. f� O/�Gn.'n�w'+r �I I ��r00i ..� 7 �It ��'.' .'- .�'^r �'V'> N. _/� `� il � �l� � n • ` J C� \ �.� : �� 1 S �¢ � • ; Z �/�✓I H•" ,..�; ��L' i:�,_..i.rs• : � a .+ts,r! _. �. �! - -- L�� ,,o• -- L7,� �i, � '' �s. • ^ ' ,vr e � --�- ;r��- f �S .Y i n :�'� •s ! � a. . +. •�y __a�IJ.<L: !�. I �ss• //)1 X '� _ c." E �,��Li ...,,r ,. - ��Si '�1 • �i �.1'ria...�-`s�7vO j 4e� � �7¢�l` �L� 'rG � C.�+ �� I 1 w �i.. �% �� /O � �L t . ��; o � y � 70' �s il it w '� � � '� i! : � � � �! d � 7 'i o� �ss) � � � ; � "i j � �5 , ��,t;��i4'S�I..�an: IOli II� ��li0i 1111 �1{2� 'tis�,• � ti' � Z::��m�7.;:C� � � /.J 4�Q� 1��) lOel .1h�1: �:�yn!3ie3s rf Q+ ss I sr Y �t: ; 9 ;:KM , �.,,�;,-: ,,,. :-�s,�,�:�,�� :_ � „� . ,: , . � 5701 -..�� u�._ �,:s: �, r,. �s-- Y,:., O�i�E --� -�--� . J,} ., ,..,.., � LYt�.J� :e �•- ro•ao ..F.. r ��, i;e* � � . n � � ♦ � ♦ �' �� : Y � y f �.9:1. � "' �. � b s I I !i' !!;!' f �•I�� . �/1,i � � , , 4,/ r. �. /' i 1 ') )5 • ' �'y.f�� /.t A' /! './ � ST� ! \ '�J• � . �i )f . H I • 1f i 6Ct'; �I . ;e � /�Op .�IlIJ/L #: � �'C,� � %t� � % � " ; r'� � 1 O ; 95� ,� � ,� � Y �' � 1. ' ' �'� � ' j�z �.; �0"�l d�� b � / ` e � � o d � �Err%� �. C � � ,: y � w ;� 4 � Z :' I Ur a E y 7� ��5��-.s�� 3 � 1 .. � � ; c ��c;�-,��rsr� � .3 S y � � �g0 '�1.. zlOOOIOIQI ��' ^� -�-«ss`es �OJQil��b'��i0`(0'�:' 1i4� �:/(��1�?:�� . � � . I j �` - f Y . C .Y. 1f [7 7S.Y �V��x . '� � ��•! '��`s,��lr�rtif� Yr. .. - .--- -� : f=:=� - ,.,,.__ .- r.�.� '_ ._....' ��" s.�a.eo• � . Tt.sl lltf 't��' ei .+.• S or sw.. wy+•rs-rw .� 1 � � s.no/I s/wa- -- �.` � ( ` e! L.Y 2 -'H.r�.S.,�C. s � �. �, ,;;�o, :� �� : � a.�DITUR S _�� _-- �s � - - . .r s� • a' . .:.,. •" _idN i�: � � �'��n— � � � , — ; ' .. .'�. � !fi '� % � %" "� �/l�SJ) �iz�a��. ; ` i (i/1•�� ' _ �_ � �. . Is.a*� 9�! . --- ,.�.- -- — . _. � � — �-�-- _� __ ;�' �sox.�c �I -'.:�-• � ;;; .. •. � •.nxs��.� ... `,� . T . . � � � 4..,v . t"."'.-,•�� • � •�?'.4s�'`E•'g1:L EST.�T� yS!'�� ,. . i � i 1,l.+-,..•• �,�5��:� /O �.�r�:3/T/D�V .- __�-+�,�;�` � ..�.� --- .��%�� . + `�5�� . « r . �,r •" .�� .J°:.�. t�n= p. r • - ----------- --� .. .Sl.l�DfVIS10R! ' � ' � 5S7 5 . .,\� , ,�. , � �,,�, �,, 6 � ��— '� � - 5525 ::�_� ., - , .. . .._... -- --- -: _ ,, � -- _: �_'' --------+ —_--__--- �-- - - .. ... , mes ♦ ---.._....__•--------...._.. ..��' ..;_......� �-- t (jS/.�) � .r� .17' ' O . �� -. . � . �s°9 �.� ....:: ...:'" �= --------......_ r -•�i�7rJ- -' ..._�.�_=� � ---•-------------•---•-----............._ v ---- '\ . g ( - (�eJ\ �'� . ' (�6�• \�� -- l/700) ------ " =�� --=="-"'==------ "=��:�.--� ; .._.s...�.__' -"- - %Jil+�. �'.��toir j,iyi<(�---------••--------- . � i ---, ---._.... __ - ------•-----------------~^-. _... ... _ � �= '\--- �/9�0% " � %uo� Y,�, �. ...._._.. -. , � I ... w.��.... .�..- . • . .. w�� /A� �? �'' In �� r � ` .�. .�..."'...._._......_.........-'�... .........jr� �� . 1 � `�s-• �K;. _.. , �� ZS 1271 IZ91 ,�. ��.- �$ - - _..._-- � � f ' ti �.w> � ,,.`Nl -,.,,r., . .. . .. �- � �i�il r%KeJ . � '�� -- • •...... ...., ... . .��,� s � j ^ . �. . . , 1� . � + � " ... . . , • ..'�i.._ iir°_§�' � � � � ��`� � .. ��' .• ; ' '.._ ,�ry` � ��.Y ' 1--- ''{ � ' �� ...� � �� •�., .......- •' . .7f1��-Jrf��.V`A� . � . _ ' �� • � , •��. .. ....... _ -r__ __ . , , J 3�'� - - --1- _ ... __ :_ - `_ __� �`" --._ f .-- . ___ ... � _ _ . _.N: . � 1 • .. . I � .. .i � ` ' " •_ ^' . Z� �I�a1�1�1 �J.� : . � _ _ . .-: - J�►'T� F?S�- .e t ___ �,e,T'� . , �. � ....... ....._ . _ .. . .. ... � , . _ . _ • �---- ;� `— � --_ __ _ . .�, � . _ .. _ _. _ 13 3 D MEETING OF JANUARY 18. 1982 PAGE 3 Mayor e asked if the Townhouse Association would oppose removal of the barrica to which the President answered in the affirmative. The President of the Townhouse Association stated they have some concerns and one is hat they don't want this replat to cost them anything. He stated anot r concern is what there plat would do to the bylaws. He stated if it ffects only the bylaws, this could be handled by the � Association, h ever, if it affects the convenants, there is the pos- � sibilfty they wo ld have to have approval by 75X of the residents. He explained their a torney is checking now if the replat would affect the covenment. Mr. Ray Lunningham, presenting parrel farr Corporation, stated, as ' far as the cost and ex nse of the replatting, there would be no expense to the Association, and he Darrel Farr Corporation would pay all costs. Mr. Flora stated staff's p'mary concern is the Fire Department access to the entire street and any iing that is satisfactory for the Fire Department and Association an acceptable to the Farr Corporation wou7d satisfy this concern. No other persons i� the audience s oke regarding this proposed replat. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to cl e the public hearing on this replat for Innsbruck North Townhouses. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayo Nee deciared the motion tarried unanimously and the public hearing close at 8:12 p, m. The persons present were advised that Counc would take action on this rep]at at the February 1. 1982 Council Meetin . 2 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PROJECT FO�ISSUA��CE OF g1,100 Mayor Nee reopened this public hearing at 6:12 p. m. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the applicant attorney s called and indicated they are not able to proceed at this time and w�s es the process withdrawn. MOTION by Counci7man Schneider to close the public hearing for e issuance of industrial development revenue bonds for the Rice Creek Compa . seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting ay , Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the pubTic hearing osed at 8:15 p. m. OLD BiiSINESS• 3 CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READIN6 OF ORDINANCE TO AMEND CITY CODE OF Mr. Flora, Pubiic Works Director, stated this rezoning is directly associated with the Nybo-Fehling proposal to develop Fir. Burandt's property and other property for commercial office space. Mr. Flora stated Mr. Burandt at the November 23, 1981 Councii meeting had requested Council action on the rezoning, however, the Council requested he work with Ms. Pfybo regarding coordination of the development of the properties. 17 --- 3 E COUNCIL MEETIN6 OF JANUARY 18, 1982 PAGE 7 � MR. BURANDT - RE: REZONING, 1001 HILLWIND ROAD (ZOA N80-02); At this time, Mr. Burandt appeared at the Council meeting and stated he was advised by his wife, who was watching the meeting on Cable Television. that the Council had tabled action on his re2oning request until March. � Mr. Burandi asked that the Counci] consider ncting on the rezoning in . February instead of March. He felt there wasn't much progress being � made with Ms. Nybo's proposal and stated he has another offer regarding the property. • Councilman Barnette stated Ms. Nybo advised the Council that her plans for financing wouid take from 45 to 60 days and based on this inforniation, the matter was tabled to March. Mr. Burandt stated he was told by Ms. Nybo it would take two weeks regarding the financing and requested the Council grant no further extensions of time. �He stated he would agree to tabling it to the second meeting in March. but wanteC it understood he didn't want it to go beyond that time. 9 R�EIVING BIDS AND AWARDIP�G CONTRACT FOR REPAIR OF WELL N0. 4(BIDS Mr. F1 a, Public Works Director, stated bids were received for the repair o We]] No. 4 and to clean the well. if it was required. He stated the ow bidder was Bergerson-Caswell and recomnended the bid be awarded t them. MOTION by Cour of Well No. 4. r VENDOR Layne Minnesota � 3147 California NE Mpls, MN 55418 EH Renner & Sons Inc. 6300 Industry Ave NW Anoka, MN 55303 Keys We11 Drilling Co. 423 N Lexington Pkwy. St. Paul, MN 55104 Fitzpatrick to receive the bids for the repair TOTAL AMOUNT OF BID STARTING DATE COMPLETION DATE 5% �$24,594.00 United pacific Ins. 5% $24,5� 70 State Surety Cc%pp $24,481.Q0 Bergesen Caswell Co. 5115 Industrial St. 5% $21,261.00 Maple Plain, MN 55359 St. Paul Fire 8 Marine Immediate 1-12-82 60 days 3-1-82 5 days after award 30-40 d�ys I4 days 45 days after award 90 days if new bowl assembly Seconded by Counci7man Barnette. Upon a voice vot all voting aye, Mayor Wee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by ,Councilman Fitzpatrick to award the bid for r air of Well No, 4 to the low bidder, Bergerson-Caswell. Seconded by ounci�man Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting a�ye, Mayor Plee de ared the motion carried unanimously. �� RESOLUTION N0. 4-1982 AUTHORIZING A STUDY TO DETERMINE IF THERE XISTS � IN THE CITY f FRIDLEY A SJGtJIFICAP�T SIIORTAGE Of SUITABLE RENTAL DWELLINGS AVAILABLE TO LOW AND MODERATE INCOME �AMILIES: Councilman Schneider stated the Uniform Condominium Act requires a public hearing be held and he felt, therefore, this should be included in Lhe reso]ution. 3-✓s-'° 4 .:•,� � �� , AN QIiUINANGE REPFALING OLD CHAPTER 220 OF TBE FRIDI,G�Y CI'1'Y �g IN ITS II�IRL�'I�Y At�A ADOPTING A NF�T CAAPTER 220 H�,m ' RESIDIIJ!`IAL RENTAL PROPF.R'1'Y A1�ID OONDOMINIOI+I OG��N AREA I+�IINPII�IJC'E �E' THE CITY OOUNCIL OF ZiiE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLi�OWS: S�CRZON 220.OI TI�7�E 7'his Chapter shall be referred to as the "Residential Rental Property and Condaminium Canunon Area Maintenance Code". S�GTIO[d 220.02 PRFAt�I� It is hereby found and declared that impaired and energy inefficient structures harbor conditions detrimental to the public health, safety and general w�elfare of the public. It is also £ound that impaired and energy inefficient structures exist within the City because of faulty design or construction; failure to keep them in a proper state of repair; lack of adequate lighting or ventilation; inability to be properly heated, improper management; or any cambination of these factors. It is declared that the improvement of impaired and energy inefficient structures and the prevention of the occurrence of impaired and energy inefficient structures in the future is in the best interest of the citizens of the City. SDCTION 220.03 900PE The provisions of this chapter shall apply uniformly to the maintenance, repair, equipment, use and occupancy of all existing residential rental properties and condominium common areas within the City. This chapter shall apply to building codes in effect at the time of the issuance of the builc7ing permit. SFJCTIO�Ai 220.04 PURF()6�E The purpose of this chapter is to maintain and improve the City's sanitation, public health, attractiveness and to protect and promote the general welfare af the public by legislation which shall be systematically enforced upon all residential rental property and condominium common areas. General objectives are: 1. To protect the character and stability of residential areas within the City. 2. To correct and prevent conditions that adversely atfect or are likely to adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare, of persons 4A renting residential properties within the City. 3. To provide for sound maintenance of heating, sanitary, electrical and ventilation systems necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of persons renting residential properties within the City. 4. To provicie basic requirements for the maintenance of existing � residential rental properties and condaninium comnon areas. � 5. To preserve the value of land and structures throughout the City. Sl�(,TIO[d 220.05 DFF11�lITIOI�S For the purpose of this chapter certain terms and words are defined. Words not specifically defined in this chapter shall have the common definition set forth in a standard dictionary. The following words are defined as follaws: _ 1. APPRCyVID shall mean approved as to construction, installation and maintenance in accordance with applicable statutes of the State ot Minnesota, and the provisions of this Code. 2. BASEMENT shall mean that portion of a buil8ing between floor and ceiling which is gartly below grade, but so located that the vertical distance fram grade to floor below is less than the vertical distance fram grade to ceiling. 3. BIDROOM shall mean a habitable roam within a dwelling unit wnich is used, or intended to be used, primarily for the purpose of sleeping, but shall not include any kitchen or dining area. 4. CLEAN shall mean the absence of rubbish, garbage, vermin and other unsightly, offensive or extraneous matter. 5. OONDOMINIUM shall mean a multiple dwelling in which portions are designated for separate ownership and the remainder of which is designatec7 for conunon awnership solely by the awners of those portions. A multiple dwelling is not a condaminium unless the undivided interests in the conm�on elements are vested in the �it owners. 6. DWELLING shall mean a structure or portion thereof designed exclusively for resiaentia2 occupancy incluc7ing one-family, two-family and - multiple dwellir.gs, but not including hotels, motels, boarding and lodging houses. 7. DWEI,LING UNIT sha7.1 mean a single unit providing complete independent living facilities for one or more persons including permanent provisions for Iiving, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. 8. EASILY CLEANABLE shall mean readily accessible and of such material and finish, and so fabricated and placed that residue which may accumulate can be completely removed by normal cleaning methods. 9. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM shall mean and include any and all methods or transmitting electricity to and within any dwelling or dwelling unit. 2 4B 1Q. �IT shall mean a continuous and unobstructed means of egress to a public way and shall include intervening doors, doorways, corridors, ramps, stairways, smokeproof enclosures, horizontal exits, exit passag�ays, exit courts and yards. 11. EXTERMINATION shall mean the control and destruction of insects, rodents, vermin or other pests. ; 12. FUNC'TIONING shall mean in such physical condition as to safely perform � the service or services for which an itesn is designed or intended. 13. HABITABLE ROOM shall mean a room or enclosed floor space used or intended to be usec� for living, sleeping, cooking or eating purposes; excluding bathrooms, water closet cx�mpartments, laianclries, furnace rooms, unfinished basements, pantries, utility rooms, foyers, communicating corridors, stairways, closets, storage spaces and attics. 14. HFATING, VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS shaZZ mean and include any and all units, equipment, material anc7 miscellaneous devices used in the process of heating, ventilating and air conditioning of any clwel.ling or dwelling unit. 15. INFESTATION sha11 mean the presence within or around a dwelling or dwelling unit of any insect, rodent, vermin or other pests. 16. KITCHErT shall mean a habitable room within a dwelling unit intended to be used for the cooking of food or the preparation of ineals. 17. LIVING ROOM shall mean a habitable roam within a dwelling anit which is intended to be used primarily for general living purposes. 18. MAINTENANCE shall mean to keep in a good state of repair; to preserve from deterioration. 19. MULTIPLE DWE�S,ING sha21 mean any dwelling or structure containing therein two or more dwelling units whether used solely or exclusively for residential purposes. 20. MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY shall mean the occupancy of a structure that supports, shelters or encZoses more than one distinct use. 2I. NON-00�'iBUSTIBLE shall mean any material or a combination of materials which complies with Section 415 of the 1979 U'�C, 22. OCCUPANCY shall mean the purpose for which a structure, or part thereoi, is used or intended to be used. 23. OCCUPANT shall mean any person residing in a dweZling or c3welling unit. 24. OPERATOR shall mean any person who has charge, care or control of a structure, or �rt thereof, in which conc3aminiums exist or rental dwellfng units are let. 25. GWNF,R shall mean any person, firm, corporation, agent or condominium association who alone, jointly or severally with others shall be in actual 3 4C possession of, or have charge, care or oontrol of any dwelling, dwelling unit or o�ndosninium within the City. 26. PF�90iN shall mean a natural person, that person's heirs, executors, administrators or assigns, and also includes a firm, partnership or corporation, its or their successors or assigns, or the agent of any of the aforesaid. � 27. PLUN�ING SYSTII►f shall mean an8 include all potable water supplies and � distribution pipes; all waste fixtures, traps, drainage and vent pipes, � and all building drains; and including the respective joints, connections, devices and appurtenances within the property lines and shall include potable water treatment or using equipment. 28. PROPERTY shall mean a11 land and structures and systems therein, platted lots or garts thereof or an tmplatted parcel of land. 29. PROPER OOTINDCTION ZO AN APPROVID SEWdt SYSTF�I shall mean a functioning sewer connection free fram defects, leaks or obstructions with sufficient capacity to arain all fixtures or appliances which feed into it. The sewer system, be it municipal or private, must be capable of disposing of sewage in a safe, sanitary and adequate manner. 30. PR(JPER DONNDCTION �tD AN APPRCJVID WATER SYSTF�I shall mean a functioning plumbing cannection free fram defects, leaks or obstructions providing a potable, control.lable flaw of water. 31. PUBLIC ARF.AS shall mean those areas which are normally used by or q�en to the general public. 32. REASONABLE CARE shall refer to the treatment of all facilities, fixtures, equipment and structural elements such that c3epreciation of these objects and materials is due to their age and normal wear rattter than due to neglect. 33. REFUSE shall mean all solid waste products or those having the character of solids rather than liquic7s; in that they will not flow readily without additional liquid and which are canposed wholly or partly of such materia].s as garbage, swill, sweepings, cleanings, trash, rubbish, litter, industrial solid wastes or domestic solic3 wastes, organic wastes or residne of animals sold as meat, £ruit or other vegetable or animal matter fran kitchen, dining room, market, food establist�nent of any places dealing in or handling meat, fowl, grain or vegetables; offal, animal excreta or the carcass of animals; tree or shrub trimmings; grass clippings, brick, plaster or other waste matter resulting from the demolition, alteration or construction of bui].dings or structures; accumulated waste materials, cans, containers, tires, junk or other such substance which may became a nuisance. 34. REPAIR shall mean to restore to a sound and acceptable state of operation, serviceability or appearance in the determination of the City. 35. RODE�IT HARBORAGE shall mean any place where rodents Iive, nest or seek shelter. 36. SAFE shall mean the condition of being free from danger and hazards y which may cause accidents or disease. 37. STRUCTURE shall mean anything constructed or erected having location on or under the ground or attached to something having location on or under the ground. 38. UNSAFE shall mean, as applied to a structure, a condition or � c�anbination of conditions which are dangerous or hazardous to persons or ► property. � 39. UNSANTTARY shall mean conditions which are dangerous or hazardous to the health of persons. 40. USE shall mean the purpose or activity for which the land or structure is designated, or intended, or for which it is occupied, utilized, or maintained, and shall include the performance of such activity as def ined by the performancy standards of this chapter. 41. �++�,TER CL06ET shall mean a toilet, with a bowl and trap made in one piece, which is connected to the City water and sewer system or other approved water supply and sewer systen. SECTION 220.06 B�ASIC RFQIIIREM�TS PERTAINING �0 THE MAINTENANCE OF RF�IDF.iJ�IAL RF�]'i`AL PROPER'I'Y AI�D ��I ��Y'�10I1 ARFAS S�C2'ION 220.�I R+esponsibility of OWners Z'he a�mer of a c7welling or dwelling unit shall be responsible for the maintenance of that structure and for meeting the provisions of this chapter. Those responsibilities may not be abrogated by a private agreament. S�CTION 220.062 R�noval of Basic Dquipment or Facilities No owner, agent, operator or occupant shall cause any facility or equipment which is required under this chapter, to be removed fran or shut off fram any occupied dwelling or dwelling unit except for such temporary interruptions as may be necessary while actual repairs or alterations are in process or during temporary energencies. SDCTIOiN 220.063 PRWISION A� M�SNl'F�3At�fCE OF BASIC SF�VICES AtID �1`ILITIFS 1. Plumbing, Heating, Ventilating anc3 Electrical Services: Every awner shall be responsible for providing and maintaining, in a safe, qood working condition, all the plumbing, heating, ventilating and electrical services to and throughout each dwelling or dwelling tmit. 2. Minimum Plur�bing Standards: All plumbing in every dwelling or dwelling unit shall be properly installed and maintained in a sanitary, safe and functioning condition, and shall be properly connected to an approved water and sewer system. 3. Minimum Aeating Standarc7s: S 4D 4E A. All dwellings shall have primary heating facilities which are properly i.nstalled and maintained in a safe, good working condition and which are capable of safely maintaining a minimum indoor temperature of 68oF. at an outside temperature of -20o F. at 36 inches above the floor in all habitable rooms, bathrooms and water closet ccxripartments i.n every c7welling �mit located therein. B. Gas or electric appliances designed specifically for cooking or water heating purposes or portable heating equipment shall not be considered as primary heating facilitzes within the meaning of this section. C. No owner or occupant shall install, operate or use a heater �nploying a flaane that is not installed and maintained in accordance with manufacturers specifications and applicable City and State Codes. - D. (�lhenever the occupant lacks direct oontrol over the sup�lied heat to a dwelling unit, it shall be the responsibility of the aaner to maintain minimum heating standards as set forth above. E. �hen facilities for interior climate control (heating, cooling and/or humidity control) are integral functions of structures containing dwelling units, it shall be the responsibility of the owner that such facilities are maintained and operated in a continuous manner and in accordance with the designed cagacity of the installed equipment. 4. Minimum Electrical Standards: Every dwelling or dwelling unit and all public and common areas supplied with electrical service, functioning overcurrent protection devices, electric outlets and electric fixtures shall be maintained in a goad and safe working condition and shall be connected to a source of electric power in a manner prescribed by the ordinances, rules and regulations of the City and the laws of the State of Minnesota. S�]CTIO�] 220.064 BASIC FOR M�11NrF.i�NCE 1. Ritchen Facilities: Ritchen Facilities in every dwelling unit shall be maintained in the following manner: A. A kitchen sink shall be in good repair, in good working condition and properly connected to an approved water supply system which provides at all times potable, heated and unheated running water under pressure, and which is connected to an approvecl sewer systen. B. Cabinets, shelves, counters and/or tables shall be in good repair, of sound construction and furnished with sur£aces that are easily cleanable and that will not impart any toxic or deleterious effect on foocl. C. A stove or similar device for cooking food and a refrigerator or � 4F similar device for the safe storage of food, shall be provided and properly maintained with all necessary connections for a safe, sanitary and efficient cyperation. 2. Windaws, Doors and Screens: A. Every windaw, exterior door and hatchway shall be substantially tight, caulked and weatherstripped and shall be kept in sound � condition and good repair. - � B. Etiery windaw, other• than a fixed windaw or storm windaw, shall be capable of being easily openecl. C. Any openable window, sliding glass door or storm door, when present, shall be provided and maintained with screens that are tight fitting and without holes. 3. Mini.mum Water Aeating Standards: Ewery dwelling shall have water heating facilities which are installed in an approved manner; are maintained and operatec3 in a safe and good working condition; and are properly connected with water lines which provide every dwelling unit with an adequate supply of water heated to a minimum temperature of 120o F. 4. Units at or Be2ow Grade: A. All windows located at or near ground level used or intended to be used for ventilation; all other apenings located at or near ground level; and all exterior doorways which might provide an entry for any insects, rodents, vermin or other pests shall be supplied with adequate screens or such other devices that will prevent their entrance into the structure. B. AI1 sewers, pipes, drains, vents or conduits and openings around them shall be constructed to prevent the entrance of any insects, rodents, vermin or other pests into the structure. C. Floors, basements and other areas in oontact with the soil shall be roclent-proofed to prevent the entrance of rodents into the structure. 5. Floors, Walls and Ceilings: Et�ery floor, wall and ceiling shall be kept in sound condition and good repair. Every floor shall be free of loose, warped, protruding or rotted floaring materials. Ewery wall and ceiling shall be free of holes, large cracks, loose plaster and shall be maintained in a tight weatherproof condition. 6. Stairways� Porches and Balconies: Every stairway, inside or outside of a dwelling and every porch or balcony, shall be kept in a safe condition and in good repair. 7. Door Locks and Security: � �� G All doors leading to public or shared areas fran all dwelling units shall be providec7 with a single cylinder c3eacmolt lock, which aust be capable of being locked fran the exterior of said unit. For the purpose of this section a"deadbolt lock" is a locking bolt, which, when in the locked position, can only be moved positively by turning a knob, key or sliding bolt. Deac3bolt locks having a bolt moved by turning a key shall be of the five-pin tumbler type or an approved equivalent. Lock thraa shall be not less than three-quarters inch (3/4"). Locks shall meet the requirements of the 1979 t�BC Section 3303 (c) . 8. Illumination of Public Aalls and Stairways: Ewery public hall and stairway in every residentia2 rental dwelling and condaminium shall be adequately �ightec7 by natural or electric light at all times so as to provide effective illumination in all parts thereof. Every public hall and stairway in dwellings containing not more than two dwelling units may be supplied with oonveniently located light switches, controZ].ing an adequate lighting system which may be turr�ed on when needed, instead of full-time lighting. 9. Facilities for Storage and Disposal of Refuse: Every awner of a residential rental property shall be responsible for provic3ing and maintaining facilities for the storage and disposal of refuse and for arranging for the weekly collection of this material. 10. Ra7ent Harborages in Occupiecl Areas: It shall be the responsibility of the awner of a dwelling to prevent the formation of ra7ent harborages in or about the premises. It st�ll further be the responsibility of said awner to prevent the storage of materials that may serve as food for rodents in a manner that is accessible to rodents. 11. Infestation Extern►ination: The awner of a dwelling shall be responsible for the extermination of any infestations on the premises. 12. Snaw R�►oval: The awner of a dwelling shall be responsib�e for cleaning and maintaining all walks, drives and steps free of any ice or any snaw accumulations of 2 or more inches within 24 hours of the storms cacnpletion. SDCPIO�N 220.07 MII�II�t � EE'FICIFI�ICY ST�6 1. All dwellings constructed prior to January l, 1976, which are renter occupied during all or a portion of the months of November through April shal� be in compliance with the Minnesota Energy Agency mandatory energy efficient standards as enumerated in 6 MCAR Section 2.2503 Subdivision B, 1& 2 which are listed belaw: A. Install weatherstripping between exterior operable window sash and frames and between exterior doors and trames. Weatherstripping is not required on storm doors or storm windaws. 0 4H B. Caulk, gasket or otherwise seal accessible exterior joints between foundation and rim joist; around window and door frames; between wall and roof; between wall panels; at penetrations for utility services through walls, floors and roofs and all other openings in the exterior envelape. 2. Effective July 1, 1983, all clwellings constructed prior to January 1, 1976, which are renter occupied during a11 or a portion of the months of November through April shall be in c�ompliance with the Minnesota Energy Agency manc3atory energy efficient standards as enumerated in 6 MCAR Section 2.2503 Subdivision B; 3-8 which are listed belaw: A. Install storm windvws on all single glazed exterior window units enclosing corn3itioned sgace. B. Install storm doors conditioned spaces unless a other appurtenance provic3es value of 2 or more. on all exterior door openings into single door, enclosed porch� vestibule or a double door effect or provides an "R" C. Install positive shut-offs for all fireplaces or fireplace stoves, unless an existing damper provides a positive shut-off. D. Install insulation in accessible attics to achieve a minimum total "R" value of the insulation of I�-19. If there is insufficient space for the installation of the recommended "R" value, then the recoRrtnendation by the City sha11 be based on installing insulation to fill the available space, providing for apprapriate v�tilation. E. Install insulation in alI accessible rim joist areas to achieve minimum total "R" value of the insulatian of R-11. If there is insufficient space for the installation of the recomnended "R" value, then the recommendation by the City shall be based on installing insulation to fill the available space. F. Install insulation in accessible walls and floors enclosing conditioned spaces to achieve a minimum total "R" value of the insulation of R-lI, when there is no insulation in a substantial portion of the exterior waZls or floors over an tmconditionecl space. Accessible walls shall include above grade foundation walls of basements or crawl spaces. If there is insufficient space for tbe installation of the reconanended "R" value, then the recormnendation by the City shall be based on installing insulation to fill the available space. 3. Compliance with the energy efficiency stanc3ards shall be mandatory if proven to be econamically feasible in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 116H.129 Subdivision 1. SDCTI(J�i 22Q.08 II+�IP,TE AEAL7E, SAFETY AI�ID GENF�2AL W'FdFARE HAZAlm6 T'he following are considered iir�nediate hazards to the health, safety anc3 general welfare of the occupant: 1. Heatinq systems that are unsafe due to: burned out or rusted out heat exchangers (fire box); burned out, rusted out or plugged flues; not being G� 4I properly v�ented; being connected with unsafe gas piping; or failing to meet the minimum heating standards set forth in Section 220.06 3, �bdivision �. 2. Water heaters that are unsafe due to: burned out or rusted out heat exchangers (fire box); burned out, rusted out or plugged flues; not being properly vented; being connected with unsafe gas piping; or lack of a � properly installed and maintained temperature and pressure relief valve. � 3. Electrical systems that are unsafe due to: dangerous overloading; � damaged or deteriorated equipment; improperly taped or spliced wiring; exposed uninsulated wires; distribntion systems of extension cords or other tenporary methods; ungrounded syste�ns or appliances. 4. Plumbing systems that are unsanitary due to: sewer backups; leaking waste systeqn fixtures and traps; Iack of water closet; 2ack of washing and bathing facilities; or cross connection of potable water supply and sewage lines. 5. Structural systems, walls, chimneys, ceilings, roofs, foundations and floor systems that will not sately carry imposed loads. 6. Refuse, garbage, human waste, animal waste, decaying vermin or other deac3 animals, or other materials rendering it unsanitary for human occupancy. ` 7. Infestation of rodents, insects, vermin and/or ather pests. SHCTION 220.09 FIRE SAFETSt 1. Fire Exits: A. All dwellings shall be equiFped with fire exits. No fire exit shall be so far removed from any dwelling unit or in such condition as to be deemed unsafe or dangerous and not fit for the purpose. B. All exit stainaays in multiple dwellings or condominiums having more than two occupied levels shall be separated from each other by a substantial separation of at least a one hour fire resistance rating as detailed in 1979 UBC Table 43-B, item 76, or other approved one hour assembly. C. All multiple dwellings or condominiums having more than two levels and the lawest level is at an elevation less than grade and having the exit at grade Ievel shall provide a substantial barrier constructed and placed so as to prevent a person fram proceeding c�m the stairs to a level lawer than the Ievel of exit. D. All multiple dwellings or condo�niniwns with 25 or more dwelling units shall provide eqnergency lighting in the exitways, corridors and systems in accordance with Chapter 5-1021 of the N.F.P.A. Std. 10I. 2. Auto�natic Alarms: A. All irultiple dwellings and condaminiums having in excess of four dwelling units shall provide a manually operated fire alarm system /0 � r � capable of alerting all the occupants of the structure. Each such alarm systen shall be activatec7 by a manual pull station located at each exit door and by an autanatic device located in the utilities and/or roan in which the heat supply is located. Such device shall be a snoke detector, detecting products of combustion other than heat, bearing the approval of the Underwriters Laboratories or Factory Mutuals Testing Service for such service, or the International Conference of Building Officials. B. Et�ery dwelling unit within a dwelling or condominium shall be provided with a smoke detector, detecting products of combustion other than heat, and conforming to the requirements of the Underwriters Laboratories or approved by the International Confer�ce of Building Officials. When actuated, the detector shall provide an alarm in the dwelling unit. 3. Fire Protection Syste�►: All fixed and portable fire protection systems and appliances must be accessible and maintained for immediate emergency use. 4. Prohibiting Inside Connection of External Appliances: It shall be unlawful for an owner of a residential rental property or condominium to allow electrical drop cords, extension cords or any electrical wire to run fram any electrical outlet fram inside the dwelling or dwelling unit for service to an electrical appliance outside of the dwelling or dwelling unit. SF]CTIOtd 220.10 I.ICI�I.SING � RF�IDENTt'IAL RHJrAL PROPER'i'Y AI�ID 1. To allow for a systematic enforcement of this ordinance upon residential rental property and condominiums, no person shall operate a residential rental property or conc3oyninium without first having obtained a license to c3o so fram the City as hereinafter provided. License renewals shal]. be filed at least 30 days prior to the license expiration date. 2. No operating license shall be issued or renewed unless rental property or condominium conforms to the orc7inances the Iaws of the State of Minnesota. 3. License Fees: the residential of the City and The annual license fee and expiration date shall be as provided in Chapter 11 of the City Code. 4. Owner or Agent to Apply: License application or renewal shall be made by the awner or his legally constituted agent. Application forms may be acquired from and subsequently filed with the City. 5. Agent Required: No operating license shall be issued to an owner wno does not reside in either Hennepin, Ramsey, Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Scott or Washington County // 1¢ J 4K unless the awner designates in writing, to the City, the name of an agent who resides in either flennepin, Raansey, Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Scott or Washington County. The designated agent shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep; legally constituted and empowered to receive any notification of City ordinance violations; authorized to institute rer►edial action to effect such orders; and accept all service or process pursuant to law. This reguirement may be waived if, in the City's determination, the awner not living in one of the aforementioned �unties, is nonetheless sufficiently accessible for the purposes of this Chapter. The City shall be notifiec7 in writing of any change of agent. 6. Agreement to Allaw Inspection: No operating license shall be issued or renewed unless the awner agrees in the application to permit inspections pursuant to Section 220.11 of this chapter. - 7. Posting of License: Every licensee shall cause to be conspicuously posted in the main entry way of the dwelling, or other conspicuous location therein, the current license for the dwelling. 8. License Not Transferable: No operating license shall be transferable. Every person holding an operating license shall give notice in writing to the City within five business days after having legally conveyed or otherwise disposed of the legal control of any licensed property. Such notice shal]. include the name and address of the person succeeding to the c�mership or control of such residential rental property or conc7aminium. 9. License Suspension or Revocation: Every operating license issued under the provisions of this chapter is subject to suspension or revocation by the City Council should the licensee or the duly authorized agent fail to operate or maintain the licensed residential rental property or condominium therein consistent with the provisions of the codes of the City and the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event that an operating license is suspended or revoked by the City Council for just cause, it shall be u�lawful for the owner or duly authorized agent to thereafter permit any new occupancies of vacant or thereafter vacated dwellings or dwelling units until such time as a valid operating license may be restored by the City Council. SFX.TIO�N 220.11 ADMIl�IISTRATI(�i The City Manaqer and/or his designated agent shall administer and enforce the provisions of this chapter and are hereby authorized to cause inspections on a scheduled basis and/or when reason exists to believe that a violation of this chapter has been or is being c�ranitted. 1. Authority: W'hen the City determines that a violation exists, a written evalation of deficiencies shall be considered prima facie evidence in any subsequent � 4L litigation of a violation under this chapter. 2. Inspection Access: If any awner, agent, aperator, occupant or other person in charge of a dwelling or dwelling unit fails or refuses to permit free access and �try to the c7welling or dwelling unit, under that person's control for an - inspection pursuant to this chapter, the City may seek a court order � authorizing such inspection. SB(.TIaN 220.12 OOt��'LIANCE ArD H�+0�1' 1. Whenever the City deternnines that any dwelling or dwelling unit fails to meet the pravisions of this chapter, the City may issue a compliance order setting forth the violations of the chapter and orc3ering the awner, agent, operator or occupant to correct such violations. This compliance order shall: A. Be in writing. B. Describe the location and nature of the violations of this ordinance. C. Establish a reasonable time for the correction of such violations. D. Be served upon the awner, agent, operator or occupant; such notice shall be de�ned to be properly served if a copy thereof is: (1) Served upon said vwner, agent, operator or occupant (2) Sent by mail to the Iast known address, or (3) Upon failure to effect the campliance order throagh (1) or (2), said order will be postec3 at a conspicuous place in or about the affected dwelling or dweZling tmit. 2. Penalty for Violation of Code: Failure to meet the requirements of the campliance order is a violation of this chapter and a misclemeanor, and is subject to all penalties provided for such violation under the provisions of Chapter 901 of the City Code. Each c3ay the violation continues in existence shall be deemed a separate violation. SF7CTIO�N 220.13 EMERG�Cii CASFS When a violation of Section 220.08 of this chapter constitutes an inm►inent peril to Iife, health. safety or property the City may require immediate compliance and if necessary take appropriate action to correct the violation. SDLTI�1 220.14 UNFIT FOR Ai7�AN flABITATION 1. Declaration: Any dwelling or dwelling unit which is damaged, decayed, di].apidated, r3 4 t� unsanitary, unsafe, infested or which lacks provision for illumination, ventilation or sanitary facilities to the eutent that the defects create a hazard to the health, safety or general welfare of the occupants or to the public, may be declared unfit for himian habitation. Whenever any dwelling or dwelling unit has been declared unfit for human habitation, the City shall order same vacatec3 within a reasonable time and shall post a placard on same indicating that it is unfit for h�nnan habitation and any operating license previously issued for such dwelling or dwelling unit shall be revoked. 2. Vacated Dwelling: It shall be emlawful for a vacant dwelling or clwelling unit, which has been c7eclared unfit for human habitation, as provic]ed above, to be used for htunan habitation until the defective conditions have been corrected and written approval has been issue@ by the City. It shall be unlawful for any person to deface or remove the declaration placard f rom any such dwelling or dwelling unit. 3. Secure Unfit and Vacated Dwellings: The awner of any dwelling or dwelling unit, which has been declared unf it for human habitation, or which is otherwise vacant for a period of 60 days or more, shall make same safe and secure so that it is not hazardous to the health, safety or general welfare of the public and does not constitute a public naisance. Any vacant dwelling or dwelling unit open at doors or winc7o�ws, if unguardec3, shall be deemed to be a hazard to the Y�alth, safety, and general welfare of the public and a public nuisance within the meaning of this chapter. 4. Aazardous Building Declaration: In the event that a dwelling or c�welling unit has been declared unfit for htm�an habitation and the owner has not remedied the defects within a prescribed reasonable time, then it may be declared a hazardous building and treated consistent with the provisions of Section 463.15 of the Minnesota Statutes. SHGPIO�N 220.15 EXHCXTPION OF QOMPLIANCE ORDERS BY PUBLIC AUI80RITY Upon failure to comply with a campliance order appeal having been taken, the City Council may, cited deficiency to be remedied as set forth i cost of such remedy shall be placed against th be levied and collected as a special assessmen Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. SDCTIO�N 220.16 RI(� OF APPF.AL within the time set and no by resolution, cause the n the campliance order. �he e subject property and may t in the manner provided by When it is alleged by any person to wham a compliance order is directed that such campliance order is based upon erroneous interpretation of this chapter, such person may appeal the compliance order as provided under Chapter 6.14 of the City Code. The filing of an appeal shall stay all proceedings, unless such a stay would cause imminent peril to lif e, health, safety or property. /'� `+��,IY • , 1 �:..�`!J:�; � �..i�ls:�.`:11� Anyone securing an interest in the dwelling or dwelling unit which has received a violation tag or compliance order shall be bound by same without further service of notice and shall be liable to all penalties and procedures by this chapter. SDC.TION 220.18 RF�Ff�L � Chapter 220 of the Fridley City Ca7e as it existed prior to the adoption - of this Ordinance is hereby repealed. PASSID AND ADOPTID BY THE CITY �UNCIL OF TfiE QTY OF FRIDLEY THIS D�AY OF , 1982 ATi'F,ST: SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY Q,F�2iC First Reading: February 22, 1982 Second Reading: Publish: ___�__ 3/11 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR -----~�_ /S � r� E�'IRING OpNA'IISSIO�T POSITIDNS � � s �GY �l�iSSI�ON (t�ap�ter 6) (5 Menbers - 3 Year �e�? � Chairperson Dean Saba 4-1-83 6325 Van Buren N.E. (H.571-1953)(B.631-5860) Viae- Jerry Cichosz 4-1-84 Chairperson 7509 Tempo Terrace N.E. (H.786-2495) (B.574-5690) nonala E, wal.l 6850 Washington St. N.E. (H.571-2272)(B.645-9236) Giles MeConville 1588 Gardena Avenue N.E. (H.574-0107) (B.378-5981� William F. Wharton 6887 Channel RQad N.E. (H.571-8555)(B.853-2207) 0 4-1-82 4-1-82 ��i3 ; �� rs� �A _ } . di-.'-` . , .. � �" � . ., � PAC� 4 ..,� � a� 4;�;.Y �►.�• �, s. 4-1-$5 4-1-85 � City of Fridley CATV Advisory Commission PSeetin� - ThursdayL February 18. 1982 Page 1 CAIS. TO ORDE3 = Vice-Chairman Ia.rry Chevalier called the CATV Advisory Com^�ission meeting of Febrvary 18. 1982. to order at 7.�30 p.m. ROLL CALLs l�;embers Present= I,arry Chevalier� Duana Feterson� �:d ICaspszak, �-:arold Bel� ur: 1;embErs Absents Burt ;leaver Others Present= Earbara Hughes Anne Davis - p�CCB Paul iCaspszak - ACCW ierry 0'Connell - Northern Cablevision Jane �remer - Northern Cablevision Adrian Herbst - Herbst & Thue� Ltd. Dan Thue - :�erbst & ihue� Ltd. paula New:�an - ACC47 i;ark Scott - ACG^+T Clyde I�'oravetz - City of Fridley ��7illiam Hunt - Citg of F ridley �mber �eichoott - Iarkin, ?�o�fman, i�aly & Lindgren APP.OP.: CATV C0:1•:1SSIOid I•:lid'J''_''ES C:' Jlit�JARY 28� 1952= ::0'^IO�: by ��r. Iiaspszak� seconded by P.r. Peterson� to approve the minutes of January 28, 1982� as �mitten. L'POIv A VOICr. VOT�. t;LL VIC�-Ca.!'iLZ[�:l�:'� C?-�VALIER li�Cl,r�t2�'.� TI� iiGiIOA? C.a.RRT�L ;J*:A?�L<QUSLY. DISCUSS A�?D �CU::I:�I�D �'�PP:ZOVAL Or •r2!�.�(J:�ST F0� P:�.GPOSAL's CATV Corcnission V01' II�� AY'L , l�lr. 0'Connell noted that in review of tho proposed P.FP, alot of the r�aterial saas identical to that already ansvrered by the Corr:pany and it would l�e costl;� to do it again. He indicated that there were two proposals to be considered� the five year short-term franchise versus the coraple �e rebuild. He asked if instead of answering the :3F'P 2'orthern could put together their otim proposal usin� the rZFP as a guideline and consider providin� a profit and Ioss statement versus the financial inforr.�tion requested in the RrP. The money saved Ly avoidin� t.he use of consultants for t.he technical and financial questions could perhaps be ehanneled into equipment instead, r's. Herbst responded that the process of renewal in Fridley will be a unique situation� thus having no specific o idalines. fie feels it important� however, to develop a list of criteria.� so:ne stzndard against which the Cable Corr.pany can submit some concrete data. about t�rhat the3* will do� when, how. etc. and how they will address perceived needs. He adde3 that he doesn't want to create sor.ething t?zat wi.11 cause unnecessar;� expense on the part of the �ble Company, but a tJay must be developed to get the information so it can be put in a finalized version that will be satisfactory to all. A:s. �remer assured the Corr!ission members that hor�hern does plan to provide a great deal of deta.ils, but they are dealin� with �wo separate proposals at this � � CATV Advisory Commission t;eeting - February 18. 1982 Page 2 time. Once a policy decision is made on the five year or the fifteen year plan. then a detailed outline of the proposa7. including technical, financial� prograr:unin� and a rate time table can be completed. She felt the Renewal Report laying out performance� the needs assessment� the position papers, etc. would be the i.nstrument they would like to respond ta using the RFP as a guideline. T•ir. Herbst referred to the Iast page of the Rr"'P anci asked if �'ridley were to decide on the five year pro,nosaZ but desirad establishing a reserve fund so that they could upgrade as time went on or keep the fund for the t�ne when they are ready to upgrade would tha.t statement be responded to if it were a guideline only? I�:s. bremer said she could not respond without first consvlting with STOtZ"::R, but reiterated that Idorthern is committed to Fridley. �:r. Kaspszak questioned aS S10iZ:.� k*ould Le more receptive to the RF'P if Fridley had advocated the fifteen year proposal. Ais. Bremsr responded that the F,FP informa.tion would probably be rr�ore appropriate for a fifteen year proposal. p1r. Y.aspszak aslced if a modi°ied i�liP tied into Pdorthern's own proposal by reference (i.e. if a specific item does not apply so state) v.*ould be raore satisfactory. 2�s. Crevalier _said th�t F�ridley just neecis to ask tiorthern to fill out ta'na.tever �aterial and then its their decisior., eit.her its �:orth it to fill it out or F�ridley should go elsewhere. i�s. Herbst added that if I�ortr.ern is tiJilling to use the i�� P as a guidelinE for solicitin� from then a response it is satisfactory. :�inat w� are trying to do i.n a rer.ewal is to ne�otiate a con,mon ur_dersta.nding so �re can draft a revised franchise and contract tha.t can be entered into tahich will r.:eet the needs identified by the renewal report. ::r. Herbst felt thE basic for.:,at should be left and used as a guidetine � a pro�osal Fzi11 be received fror� i�orthern and v.�e will at t'ia.t time be in a position to cecide if we have nc�ec:_i�.��F �.nfor.'r�t?on in k:�ich to rr�ake a decision. i•s. Chevalier su��est�d that if any of thE Con�trission rr�embers i�d f�srther innut they get it to t:r. FIerbst. rx. Peterson askeci i�r som•e �hin� on sta°f co�:r:il::ent ir. the �overnr,ent access section should be acided and i�':r. Herbst indicated that he Lrould add the followin5 stater!ents �'he Cable Conipany is ±o briefly sunsr.arize the Co::pa.ny's polic;� tow-ard maintair.i.n� equi�ment� re�lacin� equipment and providin� additional equip:ner.t ��hen the demand is shos�n. rs. 'r'_erbst noted that he k�ould talte the existin� docur�nt and correct it basec� on the sa��estions received� m.odify the it?P and c'Eelete the very costly items that are not absolut.eZy necessary. :hat document could be reviei•red at a brief ineetin? next week, a decision r:ade and raferred onto the City Council foltowir:g t'�at r:�etin�. �^P'�'•7�L ^Il"' SC��iJL?' , `� ��+_�: S:;Z^ �'AL T � T"'f � 1'�iZ� ' �.PO?T _�'G CT's ��G�n�;CIL' : .:J FJ' �:.J J 1� �J.r � J. _ __ _ _ P:r. I:oravetz referred to the :i,eport to the Citv Couneil and letter of trans:rittal with tEnta �ive time schedule and noted that l:arch _8 �s_ the .date earr.-arked for Council's reviet�: of t.he rr:aterial and he felt they s�zould have it a week to ten days in advance . � his �rould allow the Cable Cor�pany sixty da3=s to re spon3 to tne ?,r P or Rene��aal Report after receipt from the City Council. A�OTIOI� by :�s. i�^l;um� seeonded by i:r. Fiaspszalc� ih2t the time ta�le as prssenteci by �:r, r:oravetz be adhered to. UPON A Ve�ICL J0:'-.?.� kLL VO�I;3G AY�. VI4�-�H�.I:�it.11:n CI�.'VALIiR D��CLr�,�,T; Ti�E I�:O: TOid CA?�-� UI<4:�Il�iOUSLY. r� � CA.�"J Advisory Coramission I�?eeting - rebruary 18, 1982 P2�e 3 R�C�IV�' ACC�tiT A.N1?`'UAL CHAL�I°;A:d. C00?.DIl`'�TOP. !1?uB T�c,ASUR�� PORTS: N.OTIO�T by 2%s. Kaspszak, seconded by rs. Peterson� tfl receive the reports as submitted.. UPON A VOIC�; VOT'� � ALL VO:ING AY�;, VICE-C:�.R�:I1:J Ci�VAL�R D�CLA.� THE NATIOI� C�L�R�D UNA�tiII�USLY. R:�V�?� R�� ;AL R�PO�T AI?D NkY� �CO1��ATION5: A discussion followed and modifications were made that will be incorporated into a revised Renewal Report that will be presented to the Com.mission members for their review and approval. ?•:OTIOA' by r:r. F'eljum� seconded by P9r. Peterson, thrit all necessary chan�es for typographical errors, obmission of detail and obvious errors be corrected by Counsel. UPO;� A VOIC;. VOT� � ALL VOTIl�TG AYr', � VI�-CI�R�:AI� CI�VAL�R D�CIJ��:il iH::, I�0'. ION CA3RZi� UI�AN�,OUSLY. r'r. t�:oravetz noted that the rate of �15 for the basic plus one p�.ckaje should be �16. ;•;r. naspszak requested that on pa�e five reference be made to the industrial and cor��rercial areas not bein� �fully wired and indicate w.�y. i•;r. P:oravatz explained there tiaas no de:nand for it and I�s. Isaspszak said this was an educational process for the :;CCB and they should lmow that reason. r;r. _�oravetz also indicated that copies of the :�enewal Fceport were going to the ��iCCB (for inforr�ation purposes only as approval is not necessary from. them), Northern and the ACC;d. i:e also said that a technical rEport could have been included as an exhibit� bit tJorthern and the :�iCCB already have copie s so it would have been redund2.nt. :�:0:'IO'; by r;r. Peterson, seconded by P:r. E3elgum� to accept the Franchise �enewal ,�eport sub ject �to revision. UPOI3 !i VOI�r: VOT� � l�LL r�� .u•'u Al:, � VI�-C.''JiL��:A;�1 Ci:�1VAL�R DLCLIi�D 'TI� i�_0='ION CAP.R�D UItiAIdi�'iOUSLY. i?r. Kaspszalc requested that a copy of the page on con,mercial�industrial wirin� being revised and broug�►t to the next meeting. R�VL'r1 ��AF?' O�.�INl�"]C� AI�� r�!I�,� RECOI�'�'i+DATIONS: ::r. Chevalier asked I�:r. Herbst for a clarification betti,een ordinance and franchise. :,"r. Herbst said tha.t at the first meeting in Septerr.ber it was felt there should be � contract entered into by the comirunity� not just an ordinance. Le�ally� there technical_ reasons for }'�vi�a firm contract on certain provisions versus just an ordinance. If some�hing is cha3len�ed in t'_►-ie Court� they wi11 review from the standpoint of whether or not they can substitu+e a court's jud�en�ent for that of a legislative body. The test involved in court is merely a review looking at and trying to decide if the action of the le�is�a.tive body is arbiti•ary� capricious and unreasonable. Alot has been written lately about cable coripar.,�.es wanting to prevent municipalities �oni� tE�g in the busi.ness of le�islatinQ and re�ulating the cable tv industry i.e. l�t yeaxs S�r�ate file 898 which. in effect. would eliminate alot of the powers of rr,unicipalities �ith regard to cable television. Cer;.z.in actions of the National Cable Television Association would tEnd to indicate that the,y are not in favor of �m;nicipa.l regulation. Alot of people are fea�ful that. 6C C.4TV kdvisory Commission �eetin� - February 18� 1932 Pa�e 4 if munici}�alities, who deal with an upper hand when they legislate, are tested in the courts that perhaps alot of the provis�.ons in franehise ordinances could be found to be arbitrary� capricious and unreasonable because they are decided by municipalities based on the fact that the cable eompanies are coming there desiring a franchise. The way of getting around that is to ha.ve a contract as there you are dealing on a man for-man basis and the test in the court is different. It will not be dealt with as a legislative enactment, but from the standpoint of a municipality and a cabZe company entering into a contract with one ar.other. In order to prove that the contract is valid the test in court �*ould be a much stronger burden for a cable compa.ny io sustain in order to overthrow the contract rather than a legislative enactment. ST0�3 has entered into contracts in other parts of the country. is. Herbst w�ent on the explain that the two documents before the Commission members were a preliminary ordinance and preliminary a�reement intended to b� used as part of the RtP to be submitied to the Cable Company so that all of the basic under- s`�,andin�s and information ior the final agreemant �.rouid be available for their review be- fore they sui�m.it their proposal to the Commission. '_'he State Cable roard has a orovision in their rules, it is not in the State of If�inn�so+•.a latir, which says that the franchise must be �ranted by ordinance. The ^ia`^.tin� of the franchise to the cab�e eompany ':�a.s to bs done by ordinance and, therefore� the con±ract h�s to be tied to the franchise �rant, :he grantin� of a franchise neans tr.at 3�ou are �ranting thE ri�ht to the cable co:npany to use your ri;hts of �rays� t.he ri;;ht to build and construct on your public ros: s, � tc. '"he enforcement proviszons, the Iiquidated da!•x�ges, forEClosure, termination an� revocation provisions trould be found in the contract. ^he rate ordinance was a specific request of thP Con�rnission. All rate re��ulation term3nolo� ti�as removed from tne franchise ordinance and a sE�arate docutaent was created. �'his proceclure had been followed in the City of 1�u.nnEapolis and the State Cable Board ruled it acceptable. I��'r. K_aspszak questior.ed the statement on page 1,, dealin,�, with innerconnection. Specifically the sentence said •�'he City may in the fu�ure require grantee to participate in innerconnecting'. It was I�.r. Kaspsza k's understandin� that inner- connecting was mandatory. 2•s. :�erbst replied that they must conply with the State Cable Board Rules w:�ich states that they will be innerconnecy�able and ha.ve to provi.de for C1�nnel 6 innerconnection system. �Jhat they are trying to accomp.lish there is to ta.ke into account tne development of systsms throughout the ::etropolit.an area and seek to have them innerconnect with other systens. t•:r. �;aspszak also questioned if all of the material requested on page 19� annual report, wa.s necessary. I:r. T•:oravetz r.oted tha.t he had spoken with i�;r. I:�atz concerning the conversion of an annual payment to at Ieast a quarterly payment system. I:r. r�erbst said that should be included intne fee section. i:r. iiaspszak questioned on page 3� the inclusioncf business� industry and public building application in addition to private residences.- Iir. �erbst replied that the lan�uage had been taken from the State Cable °oard 4.u1es but he would check into its application. I�ir. Iiaspszak was also concerned tha.t the previous ordinance had contained a provision for ihe channeling of the revenue from cable television into the treasury for the purposes of cable television regulation.and he did not find a similar statement in the new ordinance. i�x. �-:erbst was to eheck into it. 6D CATV Advisory Commission Meeting - Februa.ry 18� 1982 Page 5 2�1r. Hunt asked for clarificatior_ of the process that was to follow with these documents. N',r. Herbst replied that he would first take the existing ?ZFP� in its present form,and make the appropriate corrections. He would, in addition� prepare a modified RFP deleting some of the pro fornr�. and other additional material not anpropria.te for a renewal. iie views the r'tF'P as a guideline in the pre- pa.ration of a_ proposal � T?orthern. After the next meeting, February 25, the Commission will decide on which format they prefer and will be recommending one RFP to the City Council� thifi report including the ordinance, contract, rate ordinance and renewal report.� Upon approval by the City Council, the appropriate materials will be sent to Northern. The rate ordinance sta.tes that the City will give public notice ten da.ys prior to a hearing in its official newspaper. I�:r. K.aspszak questioned if notice should also be included in the official newsletter of the City since it has 100� circulation. t:r. Nunt replied that this would not be an appropriate tool since it is published qua.rterly and the time line for receipt of inforN�ation to be published is six to eight weeks in advance. Mr.: Hunt sug�ested that perha.ps t.he City channel might be a better vehicle. R^V�1tiT DRAFT CON'TRACT AA;D 1�iAI� RECOr;;%NDAPIONSs Ns. Kaspszak referred to page 19 and indicated that the previous ordinance had . specifically stated providing a studio in the cable service terri�ory whereas the new contract simply sa$d an office. 1�r. Chevalier referred to page 28 stating that on the 5� gross revenues collected� they had previously ha.d the right to waive it in the event of problems with financial ability to keep in business and asked if that statement should again be included. 1�'r. Herbst said it should be specifically stated if they wanted to ha.ve it in. It was decided that the verbagE on waiver language from the old ordina�ce would be incorporated into the new contract. I�`s. �eichgott indicated that ll'orthern's silence durin�; the discussion should not be taken as approval or disapproval. ihey were simply listening to the Commissioner's comments then they would review the material and respond. R_,�t�IV:� 5� FRAiJCiiIS� FF� F�OT•' 1�`QRTi�'n:v' FOR 1981t *'0�'IOIv by t•;r. Belgum� seconded by r"s. Kaspszak to receive the franchise fee for the year 1981. UPON A VOIC:� VO"'E � ALL VOi IP'G AYE � VICE-CHl�L�i�A,ti C:�`JALL�'� D��CLA'?r`� TH� I�:OTION CARRL�-'•D UT�A,�II•"OUSLY. 0"':�'R BUS�1�SSs r:r. Chevalier asked if a response had been received from the r'ICCB in reference to the February 2, 1982 lettEr from I:r. Herbst reoarding a definition of advertisino. i•:r. Herbst noted that it had just been received and that he would address it at the February 2S meeting. ADJOURNh�1�"i's ?•'0`"ION by T`s. Peterson � seconded by h.r. Eelgum, to ad journ. UPOId A VOICE VOT� � ALL VO"�IPIG AXE � VIC�-CHAL'-c::Ai3 CI�VALIER DECLARr�D T� CATV AD'�iISORY CO;�u�:ISSIGP� i;�r�T11CG OF F �B'JRARY _l8 , 1982 . AD JGU� '� 7 AT 10 s 15 P.I•i . Pat Von i�iosch �� ■ EVEqYONE'8 TELEVISION CHANNELIQ C1�AIRPERSON'S ANNUAL REPORT January, 1982 ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOP This report marks the completion of the third agreement between the City and the Workshop. Since our original agreement in August of 1979, the - Workshop has grown considerably and currently plays over twenty-five hours of programs on channel 12 every week. The Workshop's reputation as a leader in access is well known throughout the state and we are gaining national recognition. Our reputation is well known in Anoka County. We are currently working with representatives of the North Central Suburbs Cable Communications Commission on establishing a cooperative of access channels under the umbrella of the Workshop corporation. (See Common Cause). We have also had contact with representatives from the Columbia Heights/Hilltop cable service territory and the Quad Cities CST. The Board of Directors feel a combined approach to access will strengthen operations and make them more efficient. This cooperative approach to access management will be the first in the nation and hopefully, will serve as a model for other areas. Northern CableVision has been proud enough of its association with the Workshop to use it in the franchising around the country. Articles, reports and letters by and about the Workshop have been used in their bids. This speaks well of the Workshop and its members. Our classes have proven to be very popular and are consistently filled. We currently offer six classes: Introduction to Portable Video, Part I; Portable Video Skills, Part II; Introduction to Studio Production, Part I; Studio Production Skills, Part II; Advance Studio With Editing; and Cablecasters session. Nominal fees are charged for the classes: $4.00 to L7orkshop members and $12.00 to non-members. Class participants have come from all over tt�e Metropolitan area, but most are from Anoka County. Participants have spoken highly of the quality of the classes. The Workshop coordinator, Will Loew-Blosser has also been teaching two studio production classes a quarter for Anoka Ramsey Community College. These classes have been filled every quarter. The fees from the Workshop and Anoka Ramsey classes have been important fundraisers for the Workshop. The classes raised $1,378.80 for the ��orkshop during 1981. AIV�K�A C��lNY�( ��?fYtM�.�JF�11�AY1[�NB W('�'tt3?�i0� ItNC.. ...,.._� y.:�.�.- � .> > 3�8-E�36�f�] AV�i"vU� I�I.E. �4{ii�L�1(, Ni1f�fVE�:�C�'t'A t3l��f3� ��'i'1 �14 i �E GF Chairperson's Annual Report Anoka County Communications Workshop Page 2 Another important fundraiser for the Workshop has been membership dues. Since our September membership meeting, we have collected $1,093.00 in dues. Members of the Workshop receive our newsletter VIDEOSYNCRASIES free in the mail, can take classes at a reduced rate, check out portable equipment free (non-members are charged two dollars a check-out) and are voting members of the organization. All fees of the Workshop are waived through volunteer hours. We have many young people who use volunteer time to participate in the Workshop operations. We are quite proud of the effort put forth by our members. Almost all cablecasting is done by volunteers; this allows the coordinator more time to teach and work �►ith production groups. Many programs seen on channel 12 are produced by people who are not members of the Workshop. No one is charged for studio time, channel time or technical assistance. The Workshop has never turned anyone away from a class �r use of equipment because of a fee or non-membership. People who have joined the Workshop are very proud to be members and feel they are an important part of the organization, which they are. We, the Workshop are only as strong and successful as our participants. Last �pril's Telethon raised almost $2,000 for the Workshop. This - year, we have been able to purchase two portable color video units with money from the Telethon, membership dues and class fees. To help supplement these expenditures, a Ietter was sent to civic organizations requesting their support. The local United Auto Workers chapter from FMC Corporation donated two hundred dollars. One of the priorities of the Workshop over the last few years has been to provide editing facilities for access users. Northern CableVision had two old one-inch videotape machines which they have allowed the Workshop to put into operation. Our coordinator has been able to make one machine functional. Using this machine and existing equipment, we now have editing facilities of sorts. During 1982, we will be trying to rafse funds for an editing system. The money from the I982 Telethon wilZ go to that fund. One hundred and twenty-five members of the Fridley Chamber of Commerce have been approached for donations. We have received thirty dollars to date for our editing system. A preliminary proposal has been sent to the National Endowment for the Humanities for a Youth Project Grant. The project will involve area young people in producing a series on Anoka County history, if it is funded and will run for one year. A grant proposal will soon be submitted to an area foundation for operating funds. This money will be used to hire a Director of Business Operations. The person in the position will serve as office manager and will also have the studio open an additional twenty hours a week. It is planned that the position wf12 be funded by the coop of channels after the first year. Chairperson's Annual Report Anoka County Communications Workshop Page 3 The Workshop has a number of priorities for 1982. The Board of Directors wishes to assist the Fridley Cable Commission in their work on negotiating the extension of the existing cable TV franchise agree- ment. Our Board has many years of experience and expertise represented in its membership. We are also hoping to work with Mr. Dennis Rens, the new District 14 school superintendent in getting the Fridley schools nore involved in cable TV. Our eventual hope is that a school access channel will be activated. We are currently making plans for the 1982 Telethon and ApriZ bi-annual membership meeting. Both functions are important parts of the Workshop operations. ' We have not forgotten our main objective - cor�unity awareness. During 1981, we were able to get our bi-monthly newsletter, VIDEOSYNCRASIES out on a regular basis. The newsletter is sent to three hundred individuals and organizations. The Workshop will continue to interface with the broadest segment of the pubZic pvssible, to educate and promote usage of the access channels as a com�unity voice. We will strive to maintain the high level of service we now provide. Currently, we are facing certain limitations because of our great growth over the last few years. The access studio and portable equip- ment are heavily booked. Exfstir.;; production equipment is used in our editing system. This arrangement puts restrictions on studio and portable equipment. There is currently no back-up equipment. This situation occassionally means cancelling productions when equipment - breaks down. Our staff of one coordinator is definitely overworked. Volunteers have helped greatly in cablecasting, working on the nevsletter, and doing office work. The Chairperson and Treasurer handle most management functions, while our four standing committees handle daily operations. But the coordinator's time is sti11 stretched between education duties and providing technical assistance. We hope this situation wfll be eased through the position mentioned earlier in the discussion of grants. Volunteers are being trained to tesch classes and act as studio supervisors. The Workshop was successful in raising funds this past year to help pay operating expenses and for the purchase of new equipment. During the year we purchased two color portapaks for the coimnunity's use, added a second telephone line for the studio, began printing and r�ailing our newsletter to over three tiundred individuals and organizations. All of this was paid for through class dues, memberships and the Telethon. Our dues and class fees are very nominal: Regular members $12.00; Seniors and Students $6.Q0 and non-prafit organizations $100.00. Members can take classes for $4.00, while non-members are charged $12.00. A11 membership dues and classes can be paid for in volunteer hours. i 1- � i s� Chairperson's Annual Report Anoka County Co�unications Workshop Page 4 � N Our membership dues brought the Workshop $1,142.50. We currentlq have four non-profit organizational members: St. William's Church, an Army Reserve Unit, Transcendental Meditation group and LocaZ 3b3 of the United Auto Workers. The 1981 Telethon raised $1,709.89 after aZl pledges were collected. The �Jorkshop classes raised $225.00, while the Anoka Ramsey courses accounted for $1,143.80. The Workshop slso raised money from T-shirt sales, "Access In Your Own Backyard" conference, small grants and donations. In 1981, the Workshop raised over $5,000 besides funding frmn the City. The tdorkshop has grown considerably since we hired a coordinator in September of I979. During the following year of operations, 415 programs were produced foz ETC. 12 and 527 hours of programs cable- casted. For the year January, Z981 through December, 1981, individuals and groups produced 633 programs and 1,4Q3 hours of programs were cablecasted. Total programs Average programs per week Total hours cablecasted Average hours cablecasted per week Sept.'79-Sept.'80 415 7.98 527 10.13 Jan.'81-Dec.'81 G33 + 34.44� 12.2 + 34.59X 1,403 + 62.43X 27.0 + 62.48% TheSe statistics show a very significant increase in use of the public access channel. This rise in use is an indication of the interest and dedication of the people using ETC. I2. Everyone involved with the Workshop should be very proud of our progress. Chairperson's Annual Report Anoka County Communications Workshop Page S 6I The Workshop has established credibility in the community and surrounding metro area. We are proud of our reputation as a leader in access operation and have every intention to live up to it. The future looks very good for the Workshop. The City of Fridley should be pleased that it is looked at as a leader in suburban cable TV. This is because of the hard work and deducation of the community. I would like to take the space to identify and thank a number of people who have made access work in Fridley. Mayor Nee, for his progressive leadership and overall concern that cable TV be more than an entertain- ment network. The City'Council, city staff and Cable TV Comm►ission, each for their on-going support and willingness to work with char�nel 12. Terry 0'Connell, the Northern CableVision manager for his concern that the Workshops' needs have been met. The Fridley staff of Northern CableVision, for their assistance; in particular, Tom Stark, Mike Johnson, Mike Buckley and the office staff. I cannot list the volunteers who have given personnel time at the studio. But I will list a few key volunteer names: Mike Bednarchuk, Paul Morin, Scott Briggs, Dave Harvet, John King, Timm Lovaas, Board of Directors; Mark Hotchkiss, Board of Directors; Earl Nurmi, Bob Minton, Clyde Moravetz, Board of Directors; Barbara Hughes, Kenneth Brennen, Secretary, Board of Directors;_Larry Davenport, Board of Directors; Joe North, Joseph Lapinski, Pam Mager, Kathy Reylek, Jim Bauer, Board of Directors; Paul Kaspszak, Board of Directors; and Paula Neuman, Treasurer, Board of Directors. , " ''�--- �. ' - • - ' i - " �' f `;-' ; Mark Scott, Chairperson Anoka County Communications Workshop, Inc. I ! T � m � I r I II � m I � � I A - H ,i Q � i �.s d � ,�m � °' a � a � d � 6 ti � � W � � � C 6 � m � � • � t 3 . � i k �+ � a � � � x _ � N CD N N �, f�, .- o � � � � O N � V � 6 � .!G d d � p d d � f w c�i �'' a � �+ 0 0 `D � � .�+ � .o ra .0 .0 � f;,� � U O � � �� .-+ v d r+ d a�'i a�'i > > c� > � M � � � Q a � H � . C I . . f � � 1 t � � % / I ♦ • / / • f � 1 � � � • � t � \ � l ♦ • ♦ � �. � • . • . � . . i � � � � ♦ • � } i i r i . . f � � � � � : { � 1 1 t � . t � ; . s � 1 . : . � � ♦ • . . . , � , . � -� � : ,p , N N � O O 6J � A fi H U O � � � e a � W � � � a ap, 4 V _ � � • � � ti tt1 � i� PUBLIC ACCESS A COMMON CA'JSE The Anoka County Co�nar►unications Workshop is concerned about seeing access programming become an important part of cable television systems. As cable television service becomes evailable to new communities, these communities are going to be exploring ways to make access viable in their area. It would be beneficial to all access users if access operations can be cost effective and without duplication of time and effort. While the primary purpose of access organizations is to get programming on the channel, there are many management functions that need to be performed. ' The Workshop is managed by a Board of Directors that set policy to insure everyone has an equal opportunity to participate in access, serve as financial officers for the organization, and provide leader- ship for the Workshop. At this time the Workshop has one paid employee; this position fs the coordinatoz. It is the coordinator's �ob to supervise the studio and productions, to schedule use of equipment, supervise volunteers, and to teach video training sessions. Without a coordinator, who is available daily to work with access users, it would be nearly impossible to have a successful access organization. It is the common goal of access to see that programming appears on the access channels; the management functions of access channels can be shared. There are many facets of access organization that access channels can benefit from through combined efforts. THE ANOKA COUNTY CO1rIlrIUNICATIONS WORKSHOP, INC. The Workshop has gone through the process of receiving its non-profit/ tax-exempt status with state and federal government. The business management functions Everyone's Telev.ision Channel 12 are handled by the Workshop. ETC. 12 is the public access channel in Fridley. It would be possible for other access channels to opera�e under the umbrella of the Workshop corporation. This would spare other access channels from having to go through the process of getting their own non-profit/tax-exempt status. The Workshop is governed by its By-laws (see enclosed), while ETC. 12 has a set of Operating Rules (see enclose�). Access channels should maintain their own identity with their community. This can be accomplished by identifying the channel, such as ETC. 12, establishing a Board of Directors and writing a set of operating rules for the channel. The different access channel's business functions can then be handled under the Workshop's business office. ■ public Access A Comaoa Cause Page 2 � The Workshop business office has established accounts for printing, office supplies and purchasing from gover:unent surplus. With differeat access channels operatiag under one business office, all accouats can easily be handled, such as phone bills, insurance, employees' benefits and salaries. ACCESS FJNDING ETC. 12 currently receives most of its operating expenses from the Cfty of Fridley. The city funds ETC. 12 with monies collected from the cable television company's revenues paid to the City. The City of Fridley's cable television ordinance requires that five percent of the gross revenues collected by the cable television company to be paid to the City for cable related activities. The City-uses these fuads for the city's cable television comanission, and for the Workshop's operating budget. The Workshop signs an agreement with the C1ty each year. In return, the Workshop provides the City with certain services (see attached agreement). The Workshop has been successful in raising funds for other expenses = through membership dues, training sessions, company and organization grants and our annual telethoa. We have used these funds to pay for printing and office supplies and for the purchase of portable video � equ ipraent. Each city and channel membership should finaace their own access activities, separate from other access chaznels. Access activities in one community should not finance eccess in another comanunity. The level of access in a community should reflect that community's level of financial support and volunteer efforts. The only shared costs between access channels should be those for a business office staff. FUND RAISING AND GRANTS A joint approach to iundraising and grants by all access channels under the auspices of the Workshop would increase the chance for funding. Grant making agencies and foundations are more fa✓orable to large numbers of people and geographic areas being served by their grant. A joint approach would eliminate duplication of grant requests to foundation and area or�anizations. Monies received from grants would then be evenly distributed�between fhe various a�cess channels. part of the business office staff's functions would be to work on g=ant proposals and to promote access usage by going out into the conununity aad speaking to civic or�anizations, churches and schools. This would provide an efficient and concentrated approach to grant writing, promotion of access and working with the cable companies that provide service to the communities. Public Access A Comnon Cause Page 3 A COMMON APPROACH TO ACCESS A co�on approach to access will increase all channels possibility for success, increase their chances for funding, make them more cost effective, provide them with more strength in dealing with cable companies, and share in the experience and knowledge of everyone. By splitting the activities of access programming from business office functions, eccess channels can focus on getting programs on the chanael and the business office can efficiently handle the corporate duties. The Workshop invites you to consider this approach to access and to meet with us to put this concept into action. MS:pn � Sincerely, " � � � � Mark A. Scott, Chairperson Anoka County Communications Workshop i � � . .. i � • s r� � �� EVEAYONE'8 TELEVISiON CHANNELIQ 1981 Coordinator's Report 6 r� BU�Y is the word to describe the current channel and 6tudio activities at Chaanel 12. Nfe have had such dramatic incre ases in all phases of the channel durin� the past year that a saturation point is beia� reached in s ome are as . � Our volunteer cablecasl;ers have been doing a tremendous job in keeping Channel 12 on the air. In January we were on the air for about 20 hours per week. By December, Channel 12 was on the air for about 36 hours per week. " Each of the 52 weeks during 1981 saw about 12 new programs being made. A total of 633 progra.ms were produced dur3r��- the entire year. The programs fall into several catagories. In sports we have had Fridley Peewee and Bantam Hockey, and High School Girls Volleyball. Arts and cultural programs during the ye ar have included 'Poetry 81' series, 'Have You Tried Art•, 'Senior Citizens in Art' and occasional 'special proorams with dancers, painters and musicians. In the religious araa we have had many pro�rams. These have included 'King's Family', •pastor's Study', 'That Which Is', 'The Koinoia Assembly'. iVe have had some controversy of a relioious aature with the program 'City Limits' in which a persn described how he kidnapped his sister from a religious cult. The Ieader of the religious group came in to make a reply prosram in defense. Recently the local Catholic parish church, St. Williams, has sta'rted in production. With How-To programs there was a cooking series entitled 'Natural � Foods Cooking', 'Storla's Real �state for the Future' and 'You Can Canning Center'. Under Civic Affairs, there have been a number of programs:'bietro pM' featured local attorneys and other expert guests in a series that was underwritten by the Hennepin County Bar and the FbiC plant. 'Friends and NeighUors' with host Barb Hughes had many people from city government and community Ieaders as gu�sts. 'School District 16 Report' was done by the public information officer of the district, Robyn Nahring. A news program for the hearing impaired entitled a'N�w Look' was a welcome addition to our pro�ra.mming. A youth program by Fridley High School Student Pam Tiaoer dealt with teenage alcoholism, rock and roll music and D.J.'s from local radio stations. Otber pro�rams made by Fridley youth include: '3 in 1','Album Iiour•, 'U rate'em•, 'Everyones Yote', 'The Frank &St. John Show', 'Craft a Fair•. There have been quite a number of music pro�rams. These have included: •Bill Bruce', 'Manfred', 'Bluegrass', 'The Fabulous Plumbicans', 'The Air AR�.OKA GC]UN'YY COMMUI�lICATIf]f41� Wt7l�K'�E�[�� IM1�C. 350-E33�'-iU AVf�ttilU�lV.E. �I�IE.�L.LY� �1(i[iJt�t�:�t�9'ti'A E�:��3� IC�`l�)L 7-9't44 • � Guitar Contest' and more. In the political catagory, the Fridley DFL Club has been making a steady series called 'Keeping Current•. Although the tocal Republicans have inquired several times about the possibility of making sho�s, they have not foZlowed throu�h with trainina and productfon qet. The UAW local at the FuC plant has recent2y begun production of a series 'Focus on Labor'. The program will fe ature local, state and national labor issues. Good fun has always been a part of Channel 12. The humor programs are many, from the 'Terry Lovaas �ho�' to 'This Isn't Cleveland','The H�llbound Train', •Downtawn Fried-Iey Tonite•, 'Fridley Lampoon'; the jokes are many and varied. There are many f ine programs that space does not permit me io mention. Looking back over the year, I see that the 633 programs made have been on many topics, done in as many ways as there are people. �.ch of the G33 programs has been the result of a number of people workin; to�;ether for a common purpose. �ducation, training, teaching are an imporl;ant part of the iiorkshop's activities. The m�re classes we offer the more students we seem to have. Tha educational technique we use is based on hancis on train3.na. Classes are kept small. Most of the class time is davoted to actual equipment usaoe undar the instructor's ;;uidance. In January �re arere offerin; a .LO �veek production course under the auspices of th4 Community Colleae and a once a month introductory studio class. The studio class has expanded into a three part series and we have added a two part series on our new portable equipment. In addition the 10 we� production course has doubled by addin� a second section. In January we had about 20 students enrolled, by D�cember, there were 45 enrolled. An irr�purtant factor in the �rowth has been the improvement in the facilities. In January the Fridley volunteer could record and playback studio programs in 3/4" format and in 1/L" Black & jYliite. There was no portable equipment. There was no real editting. Through the combined contributions of the peaple of Fridley and Northern CaUlevision, the VHS color�home recordin� format was added. This system is econo�nical and reliable and has become popular far home and industrial uses. The twa VHS portable units were added and an edittin ; roo�;� was setup. Tha s:ritch - from �/4" to V�iS as the main Tormat has been very successful. The si,;ni£icantly lower cust oi the VIiS tape and the �ride availability of home machines had added �co the public use of the Channel. Looking into the future, I see a real need for a second staff �erson. We are approachin� almost continuous studio usa;;e now. The time crunch will get worse without the addition of more studio time. The second major n�ed is an edittiny system. Wiih the addition of an edit�in,; sSTstem there wi.11 be a real increase in the quality of proDrams. -- Finally, the volunteers of Channel 12 have done a treme�dous jbb over the past yea.r. This is a people's channel which�cannot function without the help, support, and time of many volunteers. I thinl: the people of Fridley have good reason to be proud of the services, 3nf ormation and accomplishments that have occured through Channel 12. Fridley has become an outstanding example of the public access movement. Not only are people around the metro area coming to Fridley to learn about access, but in the state and region we are serving as an example of a good public access free speech channel. r �^ . ;'� � i `� � / �: 1,.. �4 iYilliam Loe1r-Blosser Access Coordinator Channel lZ January 14, 1982 � ' ir � AIJOKA COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOP, INC. Yearly Report for 1-1-51 to 12-31-81 Balance 12-31-a0 Incane: Ci ty of Fr idley Dues Telethon Grants Workshops ACGS7 Anoka-Rar,isey Access In Your Own Backyard Conference T-Shirt Sales Other Total Income: Expenses: Personal Services Salaries F.I.C.A. Health Insurance Total Operating Expenses: Te lephone Insurance Office SuppZies Printing Studio Supplies Maintenance and Repair Pos tage Promotional Activities Access In Service Training 2�liscellaneous Capital Outlay Portable Camera/Deck Battery Pack Set r�aterials D4iscellaneous Total Expenses: Balance 12-31-81 $ 13�594.78 867.50 750.SQ $ 1S,212.78 $ 560.20 217.00 204.22 635.72 5.58 22.00 414.84 194.41 83.00 471.53 $ 2,808.50 $ 2 � 760.90 37.50 239.19 172.A0 $ 3�209.59 $ 2,430.86 15,325.00 1,142.50 1,709.89 155.00 225.00 1,143.80 760.79 199. 00 1,097.59 $21,758.57 $ 15,212.78 2,808.50 3, 209.59 $ 21,23Q.87 $ 2,958.56 �� R - � .�I Storer Cabfe Communications A Service of Storer Broadcasting Company Post Offite Boz 4605. Miami, Florida 33769 January 22, 1982 Q City of Fridley Fridley, Minnesota Gentlemen : In accordance with Franchise Ordinance No. 646, we our Franchise Report to the City of Fridley for the thru December, 1981, which has been verified by our Maureen Houston. 0 enclose herewith period January Controller, Also enclosed you will find our check in payment of the Francfiise Fees shown to be due by the aforementioned reports. We wish to point out , the fee is being paid at five peraent(5$). If the FCC limitation is not amended, we shall be required to adjust payments at some future date to compensate for payments made in excess of the three percent(3�) allowed by Federal Law. Very truly yours, GENE L TELEVISION OF MINNESOTA, INC. �o�.,��~�� Pat Malone-Tata 6S FRANCHISE REPORT FOR : City of Fridley, Minnesota Per Franchise Ordinance No. 646 Gross receipts : January February March April May June July August September October November December Basic TV Pay TV 1981 TOTAL BASIC TV $22,333.69 $21,803.77 $22,995.64 $24,968.97 $29,639.19 $28,512.21 $29,895.89 $31,807.35 $30,617.07 $29,519.76 $30,532.28 $29,246.64 $331,872.46 Five Percent of Gross Receipts due : VERIFICATION : $ 41,554.10 PAY TV $35,288.96 $36,326.21 $37,276.72 $30,228.57 $36,635.28 $40,407.34 $42,978.16 $45,453.94 $48,401.78 $48,125.42 $49,203.28 $48,883.85 $499,209.51 I hereby verify that I have read the foregoing statement and know the content thereof and that it is true, correct, full and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. , -- d��11-��i >?� _ rl�."�`�' MAUREEN HOUSTON Controller � � • CHECK NO. DATE VENDOR NO. VENDOR NAME TOTAL AMOUNT 000266 1/22/82 CITY OF FRIDLEY 41 554.10 INYOICE NO. DATE YOUCHER GROSS AMOUNT DISCOUNT NET AMOUNT 020�67 i/22/82 41,554.10 ANNUAL RANCHISE F E PAYMEN FOR 1981 PER GREEMENT GENERAL TELEVISION OF MINNESOTA, INC. CHECK No. GENERAL TELEVISION OF MtNNESOTA, tNC. 6375 UNVERSITV AVE K 350 63rd AVENUE N.E FRIDLEV, MINNESOiA 75•t677 000266 FRiDLEY, M�NN. 55432 , ; 9�0 � _.::. ; 00D2�6 .:. :. PAY: FORTY ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND �. . �ATE:,�an. 22, 7982 ¢. fIFTY FOl1R DOLLARS AIVD TEN CENTS `$ �1,554.10* �.- . �` . � �; ... .. .q.' . N � .. �. .. : .: .. t;� ; .. . _:. .�.. TO THE ` ORDER � . .. <.. : oF • CITY OF FRJDLEY, MINNESOTA ' ' FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA °� : ::: �� I / AuT RIIED 57GNATURES u'000 266�i' �:09 10 16?? 3�: 1 L�� 28 5��,N' � 6T �. __ _ _ __.. , . TNE CITY OF FI4lC�L Y DATE March , FROM D.P.W. � SUBJECT DIRECT�RATE OF puB�ic woR�cs 1982 CATV Franchise Renewal - Cable TV TO Nasim M. Qureshi._ Throug John G. �Puti 7 MEMORARIDUM ACTIONI INFO. �� The City Cable Cor.�nission, at their February 25, 1982 meeting, approved on a four to one vote tA recommend Council approval on the final drafts of the follvwing attached documents. 1. R�eport i� City Oouncil A. Letter of Transmittal B. Renewal Process C. Renewal Time Schedule 2. Franchise Renewal Report (Addenduta 1� 3. Request For Proposal (RFP) Alternate "B" (Addendum B) 4. Proposed Franahise Ordinance (Addendwn C) 5. Proposed Rates an d Rate Change Procedure Ordinance (Addendum D) . 6. Proposed Franchise Agreement,/O�ntract ( addendum E) It is hoped that these documents will be presented to the City Council at an early date. As we discussed, the March 22, 1982 Council meeting agenda should incorporate requested action on these items. A sample resolution is attached dealing with the documents jointly. Adrian Heri�st, legal council, and members of the Cable Comunission will be present at the March 22, 1982 Council meeting tA answer any questions you or the Council may have. If you desire my presence at the Council mee ting, please advise. Please con tact me with any commen ts you have on the Cable Franchise renewal process. CM/ath ATTAQi: 10 7A CI�'Y OF F�tIDI.�Y CA'"V ADVISO�Y CO2^':ISSTOti 3:','r �'��G -^_h'�J�S�AX r;?ERU/�'�T 2�, 1982 ---PA:�� 1 CALL '"0 0'_��: Cha.irman �teaver called the CAiV Advisory Commission i:�eeting of rebruary 25, 1982, to order at 7s45 p.m. ROLL CALL: ?�'embers Presenti �urt '•Teav+er, Duane Yeterson, karold Belwm, :�d 1;aspszak, Iarry Chevalier Others Present; Gary R. t'�.tz - H�rbst � Thue, Ltd. 'vJilliam C. Hunt - �ity of Fridley Clyde I��oravetz - City of Fridle� paul i�aspszak - ACCi�J ier-ry 0��,,onnell - rdorthern CAblevision rn�ber 3eieh�ott - Lar�cin� Hoffman, Daly �t I:ind ;ren :`r. Kaspszalc indicatsd that S"0°�-�R i?OR�'n,�'��S'_" had leased an office next to the Public �eZations firrc that he is ernp2oyec with and due to proxirr.ity a busi�ess re2atior.ship had developed. Althougn he is not presently direcl,ly involved with S"C w,:�, he did want this infornation reflected in the records. ?�� 'T�. !�T_�.� P�-:CO�•� :�'� ��OII?;CIL APP?CVAL Oti FI�'•�iiL L�iiC ^S Oi �'� �-:"` :'sL J�Cuc:.r'�'�3; v�PO�.?' i0 "'H'� CITY COUi�CIL ]IvCL'JT�I'�G I.�T �� OP T�11"tiSi�:IT"^�.L� �I�::�;if�L P"?.00�.:SS AY,'D �:::: ��ihL �Ii•.�; SC �AuL^�= i�`s. iioravetz noted that the previous table of cort�nts included ad�.endums a throu�h d. 1?ddendum e has been aci�ed �:�hich is t.�e prelir!ir?ar� rate ordir_ance. '_"he Zetter of trans:�ittal re��ined the sa�:�e. I� wZ11 carry today's date and �*ilI be sior.ed by t�e Chairr:�an of t.he CoN�� sG;on. "he tine schedzzle ��as re,v-? sed �*ith :�'_arch 8th bein� the da �a o� 3"ECe1;�t of the docurr.�ents t71f-I'1 Cllscussion and action bein� ta�cen ai t;,e Cit� Council mee�i^_� on :"arch 22nd. Cnairrran '?eaver noted that �ounsel and hir.rself Y�o�;ld be present at. that City �otLncil r�eetin� and encouraoed all Cor2Ynission �rer'ners t.o attend also. 1'r. l�:as;�szak ex_pressed his concern over the J.ack of t?x�ie to rean. diges+ and react to a11 of the material to be sent to the Cii;� Council ancT '„'�ou�ht tha. � the time schedule should be delayEd to �ive t.he Cornmission ^��m�rs sufficient tine to carefully revie�, the m? terial. Gther Cor�r�ission r•�en.bers felt this r:a �erial to bE: �ralzminary, to be reviei,*e3 and cnar.�,ed i.f necessar�r, an3 aoreed that the time table should be adhered to. I�:r. i�.oravetz reiterated that thesE docur«ents are preliminary and V�ill rer-�ain so until a proposal is rece�ved from 'Lort?�ern. It was his feeling t.��at by continuing to change the prelir�inary c�ocuments you are just perfecting suUjective docur�ents and tna.t the in;oortani thing at this time �ras to submit the prel�iminary reports to get the process started. %'r. ;•'oravetz added that a11 of the inpui from prior msetir?,�,s had been anal;�zed and incorporated into the existino documEr,ts and that t}�e City Council k�ould proLk:%�ly have aaditional input aft.er iheir revie�r of the r.-,aterial, '_'he raal neoot.iations �. C,i'1'�� ,�c'viGory Commission ��"eetin� - February 25, 19R2 Pa�e _2 'begin after a proposal is submitted from the Cable Compa�y. It is at that point that the verbage etched in concrete be made. It was Mr. M�ratetz's recommendation that the documents be approved for transmittal to the City Council and added that he would be willing to submit an additional memorPndum prior to the Couneil meeting advising them of additional recomn,endations if' necessary. Ns. Kaspszak expressed his concern over the fact that some of the suggestions previously talked about had not been implemented into these documents and cited a special senior citizen rate and a special fund rather than a general one as specific examples. i•'s. ��deaver asked N,r. i�:atz if he was satisfied with the documents and he responded that he was at this time but that it was important to remember that they are preliminary. I•"s. I�Teaver also asked rir. i:atz if he could guaranteo the Comrr�ission that the items tha.t had been addressed have been embodied in the word processing version of the documents and he respond�d tr.at as ne and.erstood the concerns from the meeting of rebruary 18, 1°82� t.hey have been addressed and ir.corporated into the preliminary drafts. , i•:r. ?�'eaver indica+ed that he would like to have open discussion ar_d at the conclusion would like some action taken either way. �:r. ?�'_.atz sug�ested -that he take each docu.ment, go through the table of con��.ents and explain what action has been taken. '_�:OTIO'; by I�'�r. Belgum, seconded by r's. Peterson. to use RrP Alternate B wnich is *nore renewal oriented� as the working document to be considered the docu:nent k�hich would be forwarded to the City Council if approved. UPOA' 1� JGI^� VG�^�,, �,r7^H rOU� A}� A� 0?��3 IvAY VO?'E, ('.IiAL�I•:�11'; 1��A'J'�? D�CLA.2�D ?'I-� ;^:C�'IG'i: C!'��..��L. '�:r. Kaspszak indicatEd for the rE:cord t!zat he is objecting sir-_pl�r because he has not had sufficient time to review it. r?A.'C:�IS� A�s��i��i�� ; i�:r. I:atz noted the following raa jor changes: Section 5.02 makes re�erence to library access which is now a minin•:un: requirement, Seetion 5.03 is a new section statin� tha,t the City rr�ay request additional cha:�nels be provided when they are using the existinU 36 channels. Section 7.02 lists s�vecific re�orts that the Cab1e Company �ill have to provide. Section ?.06 is a new section in the agreernent taken from the existir_� ordinance concernin� maps. Sections 7.08 and 7.09 were moved from the ordinance to the contract as was �ect.ion 10. Section 8 provides for quarter].y paymenis of the franchise fee ra�her than annual. Sectior. 11 is a new section providin� for arUitration. Section 13.04 was cha.nged to speeify the interest rate will based on the �rime rate at a rridley bank. I"r. Belgum asked if there was anything in the documc�nts ��ich �*ouZd prevent Fridley� as a City. fror! purchasing a fraction of the otimarship of an incemin� system and rir. ��tz replied that there was not. O�J�11�;�: i�:r. I-iat•z noted the following ma jor c?�angess Section 1 previously provided for an application fee in the ordinance which has l�en deleted and replaced with a�50�000 award fee. :ie then referred to Section 14.03 which states that if the exuense to the Comrrission or 1:he City exceeds y50,000 there is a provision where the Compa.ny will also be required to pay the excass. 7C CATV Advisory Commission Neetina - February 25, 1982 Page 3 Section 4.07 is a new provision which states that no ane can operate a osble system within the City of Fridley without a franchise. Section 4.09 is a new section which grants the City the authority to adopt a sepa.rate rate ordinance. Section 5.01 now states that the City shall heve a minimum capa.city of 3b program channels. Section 5.02 siniply recites the State Cable Fsoards requirements for innerconnection. Section 7 grants the City authority t�negotiate with i�orthern what documents will be provided to them. Sections 8, 9 and 10 reflect the mini�rum standards of the State Cable Board with the substance being included in the contract. Section 11 states the mininum requirements of the State Cable Board concerning access requirements. Paul Kaspszak asked if this would be an a�propriate time for his question �*hich would involve an amendment to the r!inimum rule. i:r. ;:�atz noted tha.t the real substa.nce of the access provision is con�ained in the contract. The oruinance only reflacts the S��'s minimum requirer�:ent and ?Iorthern will be expected to bid far �evond those minimum requirements. '.`Jorthern's response k-ill then be rolled into the franchise agreement. i�,r. I�:atz, Com.mission Counsel� and N.s, �eiehgott� Northern's Counsel, concurred that the r:ini�rum requiren�ents as sta.ted bv the State Cable Board are not subject to chan?e. Iie addec3 that a Certificate of Confirmation would not be issuea if the ordinance did not reflect t.heir minimum standGrds. i•:r. s�;eaver stated that within the ordinance the Co;,:,�is�ion nrust. adhere to the ?';CCL's edicts, but the franchise a;;reement is a dil°ferent i s sue . ?•:r. i:aspszak stated t.hat no�rherF hac�. it beer c'ecided what the r_e;;otia?-�1_e itFr�s were. i"r. '�'eaver pointed out that the i'CCB sets the base line. � he di1'ft.rence bet-�een the `�` ��_.� Na se line and wnere ?'or`_•he-rn is loday is a product of past negotiatior.s. If irodificat�ons are to be n:dde in s�:�erc they arE today trat is up for nP�oliat.ion, but :.he ne3otiation �rocess cannot be er.�ared i�to urtil �:ort.hern becor.es involved. The di�ierence �EfLJeen the base line and thE poin� that "_�ort•hern operatF:s at is tne r_s�otia.bl.e area. Paul ;:aspsza; asice�� irhen ±,'-�iG c�ocur�ent would be used a�aiY� o�he�^ tr.an t.o satis�y _�:CC= rEquire:,ents. I•'r. '�.'eaver said in tre evEnt t.hat the COI'_P2:�j� would crioose to o��erate �.�alt t�low ±he ne�ot:iated. level ana also Y�low the orc3irance, t:�e:� t,he o-r� inance t,touln Yr�vE: to cor��e in+o play. ;�'r. ?��t.2 added ±•hat. t.here will be proviGior.s UTit.hir. t'.ie con+ract for liquidated cam4�es in the ever.t, the Company doesr.'t co:�ply wi±h a11 the terrr,s of either t?:e ordinar.ce or the contract. Section I2 is a new section pert.ainin� to tho aciministratior_ of the frar_chise w�ich allows t,he City to c�esignate a city official, the chairrra.n of the Co�r�rnission or a Comrnission men;ber to serve as the Corlmissior_ coordinator and listed fii teen ta<ks that person would be involved with. Sections 12.06� 12,07 and I2.08 are contained in the present ordinance and V�ill no�r be co:ntained in the contract. ?l�T� OFDZ�AF�CE: The ordi.nance remained essentially the same except that the Company kTill norr be required to docuraent costs they incvr in receivin� services from S�"0�� when t.hey request a rate chan�e. ��i� C!�T�l Advisor Corr�r.ission I��eetin - Februa 25, 19�2 Pa e 4 Nx. i:Qravetz noted that pursuant to i:r. Raspszak's request he had a copy of the revised paragraph from the Renewal Beport on the need for extended services in the commercial�industrial areas which had been discussed at the February 18th r.ieeting. ?,'0'•_"IOIv' by I�:r. Chevalier� seconded by ix. Peterson, that the Commission receive and recom_r.�_r1d._Council_ _approval _on_the final drafts of the followin� �ble :�___� _. _,, _. ._ _... __...._.�...�__.. �.ranchise __��neiral items� A-Report to the City Council jincludin� the Letter of ------ Transmitta.l� Renewal Process and F,enewal Time Schedule; fi-Franchise Renewal Reporti C-�equest for Proposal Alternate B; D-Prelimin�ry Franchise Ordinance; E-Preliminary 3ates and Rate Change Procedure Ordinance; and r-Preliminary rranchise Agreement�Contract as presented to the Commission February 25, 19�2. It was suggested that the title should read Proposed Cable Communications Franchise Ordinance . UPON A VOIC� VO'�E �',?TT�i FOUR AY� AA'�� Ol��: 2�A1 VO u� C'ri.AIRi�;A�' '�ri.AV�R i::�CLApED 'I'iv� i'OTION CA�.R�. I�s. Yaspszak indicated for the record ��t he was objecting simply because he did not have suff icient time to review the cocuments. P.-;C, Itl �; I,�,^'T::� Or R�� GI� A^C�-:SS C��'v':'ISs I,'CCE '_�.ih�ii�J SPO''S0�`-iiP A":•:;.rJOR 1�D'��:^I�;�i�:�i�r ?�s. Herbst' s letter of r ebruary 2, 1982 � to the ;'CC3 asiced two questions one being th� permissibility of sponsorships or advei•tisements on a11 access channels and secondly the permissible parar;eters, tl. preliminary rulino was received from P�s. Donaldson subject t.o ratification of the State Cab1e Boa�t at their t_%:arch meeting. ^ssentially.±he Ca.ble tsoard has responded tha.t this is a matter that can be left up to the Cor*par�y and the con:r.unity to devise w?zatever rules they so desire. Consequently� the permissible parameters are also Ieft to the Company and t�e municipality, IYx. i�'atz indicated that typically the State C�bZe Board does ratify :he informal interpretations that are issued. MO"'IO'd by :�'_r. Peterson, seconded by ?�ir. Belgum, to aecept the letter of the i�:CCF. UPO;; A VOICE V0 "E � ALL V0�'II\:� A �, CI-;IaI?ii�:4tv ',�AV'�� D:�CI.��.�% T.T� :•:0: IO�� Cl��?� Ut�l�'�iI�,OUSLY. �Li�JSrIlJL�S'S CO�1:.1�'��10}� ��J JTIl,1 L1Yl��S FO� j�:��`-Ch AT� I'Lj��iL� Chairn�an Waaver su�gested that the Gonu�ission gather prior to the City Council meetino on i�:areh 22nd at 7=00 p.m. and have that �:eetin� serve as their rron�hly meeting. "he April meetin� was rescheduled for April 22nd at 7s4,5 p.m. OT?-.�R BUSIT'�SS: r_r. Chevalier, as a Comrrission n,eniber, thanked 1'r. ?�=oravetz and the attorneys for the tirre involved in preparaiion of all of the docur.:ents and in gettino them to the Conur,ission men:bers as efficiently as they did. 1•'r. relgu.�r� is to draft a resolution to that effect. ADJOU�.NP�.T��J':" s ":•'G�IO"? by r'r. Belg�um� seconded by I�s. Peterson, to adjourn. UPOt: A VQIC�, VOTr., ALL V0='IP�G A� �, � CFiA I.��•1��: '°�A JL� i�ECI,r��.D '_"' �� CATV Ai. JISC�RY COi::�:ISSIO'1 I ��:'I2d�r 0; FliBRUA.RY 25, 1982� ADJO'J?,i��'sD A?' 9s00 P.P:. Pat Von i•'osch ��. � .� •. t:: !1 RF50LiT1ZQ�i TO �ORIZB SOLICITATIO�N OF PItOPOS�l�,L FOR R@3�AL CF A CABLS 00!!Nl[JNICt,TIOTIS SYSTF��! FRO!! PORTHffi2N Q�P�V7SI(�i, � BE IT RF.SOLVID by the City Camcil of the City of Fridley as follvws: WHEREAS, the City Camcil of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, is tbe official gaverning bady of the Cityf acd h�II�FAS. �iE City Council has established a Cable Cammunication Advisory Ca�enission of the Cityt � WFIEREAS, the City Council in conjunction with its Cable Communications Advisory Commission has for the past year wnc7ertaken a study to evaluate the existing cable communications system in the City of Fridley and various options relative to renewal, renegotiation or seeking out s new cable cam�w�ications franchfse? � WHIItFAS, the City Camcil, baseci upon the foregoing study has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Fridley at this time to seek an upgraded cable conmxmfcations systen from Northern Cablevision, Incorporated, the pr�ent provider of cable service in the City of Frfdley; and WHE�'AS, the City Camcil has detezmined that due to the rapid growth and develo�pment of cable conummications in the �ri.n City metropolitan area theze may be a better opportunity for the City of Fridley to expand cable �mications systems' possibilities and provide a greater benefit to the citizens of Fridley by not granting a long-term franchise to Northern Cablevision at this time but rather waiting to see what does develop in the 2V�in City metropolitan a=ea, and in particular, in the adjoining communities to Frialey: NpW, �1EREFORE, the City Cau►cil of the City of Frialey in a regular meeting assembled dces hereby r�olwe as follows: l. That the City Manager in conj�nction with the Cable Communications Advisory Commission of the City seek a five (5} year renewal of the existing cahZe communications franchise with Northern Cablevision, Incorporated and that it do so by providing to Northern Cablevision the following documents for their review and utilization as a guide in presentinq a proposed offering of cable communications services to Fridley: a. A proposed Cable Conenta�ications Franchise Ordinance. b. A Preliminazy Franchise Agreement. c. A Request for Praposal. d. A Rate Ordinance. e. The Renewz+l Report. 2. That a copy of the Renewal Report is required to be filed with the Minnesota Cable Cammmications Boarc] by the City Nlana9er together with copies of each of the fo=egoing describe3 docwrents. 3. That the City Manager in conjunction with the Cable Communications Advisory Commission request that Northern Cablevision, Incorporated respond and present its proposal to the City not later than MaY 7► 1982► in a form consistent with the requiranents of the Request far Proposal. 4. That the Cit� Manager in conjunction with the Cable Communications Advisory CanHnission are authorized to evaluate the proposal of Northern Cablevision, Incorporatec3 and to present a final report and reoo�nenc]atfan to the City Council together with the finalized Franchise Ordinance. Rate Ordinance and Franchise Agreenent at the earliest possible date following receipt of the proposal fran Northern Cablevision, Incorporated• pASSED AAID ADOPTID HIf 7.ilE CITY OOUNCIL OF 24iE CITY OF FRIDLE�' '141IS UAY OF , 1982. WiLL7AM J. 1�E - MAYOR AZ'PFST: SIDNEY C. I2�1F�N - CITY CLERK 7E � CTTY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 10, 1982 CALL TO ORDER: Vice-Chairperson Oquist called the March 10, 1982, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. ROLL CALL: ________— Members Present: Mr. Oquist. Ms. Gabel, Mr. Svanda, Mr. Kondrick, Ms. van Dan, Mr. Saba (arr, 8:45 p.m.) Members Absent: Mr. Harris Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, City Planner Scott Wheeler, Planning Intern Ron Miller, 5705 Jackson St. N.E. Mark Anderson, 556 - 37th Ave. {d.E. Allen Stahlberg, 305 - 89th Ave. N.E., Blaine Donna J. Miller, 6430 East River Road Peter D. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Dr. N.E. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 24 1982, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� 5ECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 24, 1982� PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION p' CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. TABLED: RE UEST FOR.A L07 SPLIT, L.S. #82-02, BY MARK ANDERSON: Split off t e ort 8 feet of ot , Au itor s Su �vision o. 2 953 ississippi Street N.E.) to make a buildable lot, the same being 6530 Oakley Street N.E. MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MR. 5VANDA, TD RElNOVE L.S. #82-02 BY MARK ANDERSON FROM TNE TABLE. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VSCE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated this item was tabled at the last Planning Commission meeting because Mr. Anderson was not at the meeting. He is at the meeting tonight. He stated it is Staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission approve the lot split with the condition that a 10 ft. bikeway�walkway easement be retained along Mississippi St. Ne stated this easement has been discussed with Mr. Anderson. He stated Mr. Anderson has applied for variances and those variences will be going through the Appeals Commission. Staff will tie both the variances and the lot split together before going to City Council. . � �• PLANNING COMMISSI4N MEETING, MARCH 10 1982 PAGE 2 Mr. Ron Miller, 57Q5 Jackson St. N.E,, stated he and Mr. Anderson will be pUrchasing the new lot. He asked Mr. Boardman to describe the bikeway/walkway easement, Mr. Boardman stated that right now there is a sidewalk a7ong Mississippi St., and the City needs to room to expand the sidewalk for a bikeway on the north side of Mississippi. At one time, a bikelane was striped on Mississippi, but when the County changed Mississippi to a four-lane road, they eliminated the bikeway. That is why the City is requesting a 10 ft. �ikeway/walkway easement on a]1 new requests. , MOT70N BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MS. VAN DAN� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNGIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST� L.S. #82-02� BY MARK ANDERSON� TO SPLIT OFF THE NORTH SI FEET OF LOT 8H� AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 21 (953 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E.) TO MAKE A NEW BUILDABLE LOT� THE SAME BEING 6530 OAKLEY STREET N.E.� WITH THE FOLLOWING TWO STIPULATIONS: 1. THE LOT SPLZT BE CONDITIONED UPON THE APPLICATION FOR REAR YARD VARIANCES. 2. THE CITY RETAIN A 10 FT. BIKEWAY/WALKWAY EASEMENT ON MISS3SSIPP? ST. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� DICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated the variances will go to the Appeals Commission on March 16, and then both the lot split and the variances shou]d go to City Council on March 22. (Mr. Saba arrived at 8:45 p.m.) 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.S. #82-03, BY DONNA MILLER: Split Lot 1, 63ock 1, eit's 2nd Ad ition, and Lot 26, Auditor's Sub. No. 23, combined into three lots: (110 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.) The easterly 65' of Lot 1, Block 1, Veit's 2nd Addition together with the easterly 75.19' of Lot 26, A,S, #23, and (120 - 64 1/2 Way N.E.) The Easterly 140' of Lot 1, Block 1, Veit's 2nd Addition, except the easterly 65', together with the easterly 150.19' of Lot 23, A.S, #23, except the easterly 75.19', and {710 - 64 1�2 Way) The westerty 128.01' of Lot 1, Block 1, Veit's Znd Addition, together with the westerly 121.23' of Lot 26, A.S. #23. (This lot is presently,addressed as 6430 East River Road, but if the lot split is approved, it will require an ' address change.) Mr. Boardman stated this layout has now been changed and the ]egal description has been changed. Before, the lot lines were uneveh, and they have now evened up the lot lines for a simpler lot split. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO RECEIVE THE REDEFINED SURVEYOR�S MAP OF THE LOT SPLIT. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY. . , PLA�NING COMMISSION�MEETING, MARCH 10, 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Boardman stated this is now a very simple lot split. There are presently twa buildable lots, and Ms. Miller wants to position those lot lines to make it easier to build on and to make three lots. All of the lots are over 9,000 sq. ft. The surveyor's drawing shows that a portion of the property is on East River Road. That is probably dedicated as street easement, but it should be cleared up befare final approval of the lot split. He stated Ms. Miller should check on this, and the Planning Commission should �ake the recommendation that if the easement is not there now, it should be. It is also advisable that the petitioner apply for a vacation of the drainage and utility easement, but that is up to the petitioner. MOTION BY MR. SVANDA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.B. �82-03, BY DONNA MILLER TO SPLIT OFF LOT 1� BLOCK 1� VEIT'S 2ND ADDITION� AND LOT 26� AUDITOR'S SUB. NO. 23� I�1T0 THE FOLLOWING THREE DESCRIBED TRACTS: (140 64 1/2 WAY)_� TRACT 1: THE SOUTHWEST 138.01' OF LOT L� BLOCK 1� VEIT'S 2ND ADDITION AND OF LOT 26� AUD. SUB. NO. 23; (120 64 1/2 WAY)� TRACT 2: THE SDUTHWEST 204.1' OF LOT 1� BLOQC 1� VEIT�S 2ND ADDITION AND OF LOT 26, AUD. SUB. NO. 23� EXCEPT THE SOUTHWEST 138.1' THEREOF: AND (110 64 1/2 WAY)� TRACT 3: IAT 1, BLOCK 1, VEIT'S 2ND ADDITION� AND LOT 26, AUD. SUB. NO. 23� EXCEPT THE SOUTHWEST 204.01' THEREOF� AND EXCEPT THE NORTHEA5T 28.5� OF SAID LOT 26. TRACT BEING USED FOR EAST RIVER ROAD BUT OWNED BY CLIENT: TNE NORTHEAST 28.58� OF LOT 26� AUD. SUB. NO. 23j WITH THE PROVISION THAT TXE PROPERTY OWNER CHECK ON THE EASTsMENT FOR THE 75' x 28.58' PORTION ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY EXTENDING INTO EAST RIVER ROADM AND DEDICATE SUCH EASEMENT TO ANOKA COUNTY, IF THIS HAS NOT ALREADY BEEN DONE. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� VICE—CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated L.S. #82-03 would go to City Council on March 22. 3. RECEIVE FfBRUARY 17, 1982, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO RECEIVE FEBRAARY 17� �982� HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE—CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Extension of Special Use Permit, SP #78-10 by Allen B. Stahlberg Mr. 8oardman stated the Commission had received a copy of a letter from Mr. Stahlberg. Mr. Stahlberg got a special use permit in 1978 for construction of a single family home in the flood plain. Since that time, he has had three extensions.. At the last extension, the City Council stipulated that it be the last extension and that if there were any further extensions, Mr. Stahlberg would have to reapply for a new special use permit. : PLANNING COMMISSIQN MEETING� MARCH 10, 1982 _____ PAGE 4 Mr. Boardman stated that special use permits are set up under the Zoning Code to last for a period of one year. If the action that � the specia� use permit was applied for does not take place within that one year period, the petitioner is required to go through the Planning Commission and City Counci] to request an extension. Since Mr. Stahlberg has already had three extensions, the City Council stipulated that no more extensions be given. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED SY iQZ. SVANDA, TO RECEIVE TXE LE!'TER FROM MR. ALLEN B. STAHLBERG DATED MARCN B� 1982. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Stahlberg stated that it is not that he has wanted to come back so many times for extensions, but it has been a matter of economics. He was laid off his job about a year ago, and he is now hoping to get back on his feet this fall in a new occupation. That is why he is requesting a one year extension, rather than six months. Right now he has plans with a builder to gei an estimate. Just completing the bid process may take a few months, but he is trying to move as fast as he can. Ms. Gabel stated that if the Planning Comnission does not grant the extension, Mr. Stahlberg has to reapply for a new special use permit, go through another public hearing,and the findings are probably going to be the same. l�Ir. Boardman stated the Commission has to understand that every time there is an extension, there are staff costs--meeting time, review time, etc. He thought that was why after so many extensions, the City Council said there would be no mare extensions. Ms. Gabel stated that normally she wouid agree with that, but she is wondering what there is to review about this. It is not something that is extremely complicated, and she just did not think the review time involved could be very significant. Mr. Svanda stated that if the Planning Comnission denies the extension, Mr. Stahlberg has to go through the special use permit process all over again. Referring to Mr. 8oardman's comment about staff costs, that $200 special use permit fee may or may not recoup the staff costs for reviewing, writing memos, and attending meetings to bring it back before the Planning Commission, and nothing has really changed. Granted, there have been a number of extensions, but it seems they were because of things that were possibly beyond Mr. Stahlberg's control. He thought they should give Mr. Stahlberg one more chance at it, since nothing has materially changed on the request. It is going to cost a few dollars just Co process the $200 on a new special use permit. . � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MARCH 10, 1982 PAGE 5 MOTION BY MR. SVANDA� SECONDED BY !►!8. GABEL� TD RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN EXTENSION OF ONE YEAR FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT� SP #78-10� BY ALLF.N B. STAXLBERG, FOR THE FOLLOWING RSASONS: 1. REQUIRTNG MR. STAHLBERG TD GD TXROUGH 2'HE PROCESS AGAIN WOULD RESULT IN HIM HAVING TO SPEND ANOTHER $200. 2. IT WDULD REQUIRE THE EXPENDITURE OF ADDITIONAL STAFF TIME ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT HA5 ALREADY BEEN EXPENDED. 3. IT IS FELT THAT THE $200 WOULD PROBABLY NOT COVER THAT ADDI220NAL STAFF TIME COSTS AND IT COSTS MONEY TO PROCESS TXE PAYMENT . 4. NOTHING HAS APPARENTLY CHANGED TO WARRANT AN IN-DEPTX RE-REVIEW OF THE SITUATION. 5. DELAYS HAVE BEEN BEYDND MR. STAHLBERG'S CONTROL DUE TO A JOB LAY-OFF AND THE PDOR HOU52NG MARKET. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Boardman stated this would go to City Council on March 22. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TD ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON pQUIST DECLARED THE MARCH 10� 1982� PLANNING COMMI5SIDN MEETING AA70URNED AT 8:30 P.M. Res ectfully submitted, � : � �� y eSaa - Recording Secretary Ti�1E CITY OF FRIC�L Y fDATE ISUBJECT DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS March ]7, ]982 yy Jerrold L. Boardman, Planning l.S. #82-02, Mark Anderson MEMO N0. 82-18 TO John Flora : MEMORANDUM ACTIONI INFO. The Planning Commission at their March 10, 1982 meeting recommended approval of Lot Split #82-02 with two stipulations: a 1. l0 foot bikeway easement along Mississippi Street. 2. Subject to variance approval. X The applicant has agreed to dedicate 10 feet of easement along Mississippi Street for a bikeway system. They also made a request to the Appeals Co�nission for a rear yard variance created by the request for a lot split. This variance was heard by the Appeals Commission on March 16; 1982 and, by a unanimous vote, approved. With the variance appraved by the Appeals Comnission, the only stipulation of the P7anning Corr�nission which needs to be brought to the City Council is the 10 foot bikeway easement on Mississippi Street. JLB/de " 8F e . �/ ' ''��;;� 1 � �: �crtio pe. �- _� } Li `- ," �s; e °��z�:' r a„;,;; �(�' """ ,.... ,`,,�:.�:,::,;� ;° .. ` � M: N _.. ' ov°•: 'V :�>��,�•�� .. .�. � 24 -' - �t;>,mo�,;,;^.,;;> � �sw �� _:- � L.S. #82-02 '. � ;�''�;��I,a;` _.. „_.a,:x -� +.._. � �m,, `.;� -_ � , _ � Mark Anderson ,j�° �,� — __ � _ 3 - ��.., - �� -- a` . --_ .. . o��, �, \ � - �� ' _ - .. � ��„ ,.o. Q�F� -_ � � _ ..... � \ �; �; ��; !�� ; ; ; _ - �-- . � � ,�,�� ., n� r , - g.� �`' - `��,�� ._�-�t��_��ud _��'1��-�� , '�"�• � '. �`�, �, . 3 �-- n ��`. b�', � �` �. ' ;1 � +�; --�(��-�T �� . ' = -�Li��a � . " �-� � , � � . � �,�� p% �- _ � �� 0� ' � �� Ta, � �p �' � o✓,�t �,"_.�_, /''�-�� i i� �j� � � � ��L�7� �,I t ` �` '� � L 'i _ � v� '>> � � § � -'��`'`�� - � �Jp l; / � ` � I —�j'��" N . t I' r" �� ';'� �� ' i�'1 rY��..�.J�� z-~---, d�!�,-� � � r�� - --� �� _ - . W _ E I � �� _ � I_ i ' ;� �,�� I�- I ,_ �� L__1,�i. �—_ -� �F .. _ ._... � S � �_-___��; --�- ,� --� - —hf ,�`� il r � g � /r� T ~ � . � � ��I �� I -_�rr ��f� =�,R- S` - � �—l�� I � I �O � �, . �----- r �-- l-- � a !_f 'c i � �: � '�-_, �� .�� "i� I _ � �� 'L e,. ^ V N I � �� ,� y`� �� /j� I� �\ ,e! 'a` � _i` a vNi -�r� > � �� _�l-.1L� ! ;1 b I � � �.�� .. �; ��',� � � �� .T, , —.� �-- 1 �``��`�� =��,� . ,� _ � _ � �,�,�� !��0 � �� ' �� ' =-�� i� `�� '��`. � I �; � �,�-�, I l,. , �� C�� rk ► � E � � � . �� q�� , ,� �L _ R�� _ � , ��{ � - [� j - I � ,�---�, � � ' �� ,� 1;��.� • o - e4,a � L . .1�% u � � �( rs 1 1�� E i �� L--� y��'�� 1� ;. > ' � �3�, k �, J � c I � � � E c ' /�L �I� L 1 -�� 00��=" b : � `�x� ,� � �� a C I ��'' � � —jf.��W � �� Moa^f ` %'N' `�� a. �� i i - J � I � , : : �� a � / o T�...� � �-"0 r1 �� f� ��' �` t �� `,r, , -�, a,z , �� , t �� ,,� 1 i� � E`—� "' ,�j �'i. 0(� ,9 - � I"Iy''°�='-'�i , / F �- �; � r`r"� - j I � � � ._� � � � � - - �� I p� -�� f�,.�� . � ='�'r � q� �\�� ,,� - _ � ' �. ` ��` �+��' ( ,�� , t ' i I „ � -,� i ' '-� ^'Q �� "'—'H�% `� �.�� j � ,� � > � _- /�`\ ¢ _ I ^ I� � 1��I f��r��"--t� �1.:,� ' _ ��LLLJ' . '.. J I Y 1 \ �//' �% - I 1 �m � � ; �' -- , I � � ��. �3��`�`�_,��f j n �� -- i I�i� - . _ _ � �- ,r--��,J� ,��. _, _-1 , --�F . � ( U� ; � i , '� _ I �� _ _- _ - i Mv � ,� �-�1�� F ' 1 : i � . - � � _� � � �� s `0 `�� I ��;� _ . ' — ` � ��. = � . � :_ � 'l`. ,I ...� r I � . , ��, J F u , _ � T�I[� N � I — ��WW� � Y'y I .�..s.— N� O `*.,� I =, I 1� _ _ � _ I �.��w�. _� ..e.... e.�. � '.. ■ '_ W� . _ ._ ` � F i = � _ _,� I �� ' :I 0 ' � . -,' '= _ . K � � ,�r ,: � _ _ 1 ._ ' = , � _ i D --� ��_. L _ _ ; , _ � ' _ - � ��'�� ! i - -- I � _. _.. ' ^ +� _,_ � - ; = .. �� _ ., -:.- . � - ..�. �.. �' , ' � TREET MA - TY = , - � ' _ - Si P CI OF _ p ___ t � 1 = �� , FRIDLEY __ � � ' T- _ L � � :, ..�.,.--=�- -- � n._~:�:�--- �s.: c i `� - w . � :� p ..,�.. .........,�. _ _��.. o _ .,.. w � I _.�- .. �ortg�� oan � O � � 0 :� -� � � i O � � Q � .� � Y � � � � _ � -�- Q J �� -� � � � urv�y fo' � � _ L.S. #82-02, Mark Anderson - �or �i� � in e, o+ �...o � 8 i�i � 5�.�o�,a) ��:v��.e d/�u� ��-o �:�bd��s�or t�o 2�. , � � � �� . — ,,,.3, — ;:;: ;�:: : ':t:�:.;ti; . ;;�.'r�:, i ��o�:��:�}� :�::;;:�;::;::;:: .��4.: \ . I, ;�:: �: �� ::�::�:': :��1:::�:�::�::��.:��:��:�:�::� ��:::::. ��`::�� :::�::::�::� � ��:: :•�::: ....��..: :�::� • ::�.. ,�::; .,::: ' � :'.";�•��: ' �' �.`` '��'�'��'��?��,��:�:�:�.�':"�':tr�;. �'r:•;:.:�.'��,:�:::i;�:.�':;':..• • "r..l.a L � .i•• � i�- . - . . 'LU.3 . .. __l�:�l �r rM .. � � ;1�!F:r;tC_ � Ti- / � 24. __� 'll•351 .. 1�2.�5 �, . - ' _ 1 `I2 �tor.S �+ ^ r,i, � ie. _ p � Frawi� 9 � ` � c+ . � �4� N Ca�.yr.,��E, : � {i� R 1. i,5 ! 32.5 ( CJ -�--.- � �;;/� S � � .. �+�7 24. � . �N 6� �r. �•1� � . � � _ �� _ � . . . _`o �. ` -�_.--•�'-�,,�- ---�-'1 '- ' � --. . "--�t �o�.�.v�� r.cawt�cw� 1" , i v.��'nn, plas!'�c cnCloS,re� � - , i-� ��'`- _ .. . f'-�- � � � i +� o; .; r� _, . � — �ti.3� — 15 33.0 ; -------.� � i � / i , i ; W � � . � � i ! i 1 ; � . � � G� � 1 � ' � . j � . � � v � - d � '1 .� 33. o � �� 1981 POLICY STATEMENT ON PAFK FEES ON LAND SUBDIVISION L.S. #82-03 6randt & Anderson Date �—/'�%—�°Z ----� In determining fair market value of public areas for land subdivision for cash payment, as required by Ordinance 633, the following values w�ll be used: Res9dential subdivision �1,000.00 per lot Residential lot'split $ 500.00 per iot CoRUnercial/Industrial subdivision or 7ot splits � 0.015 per sq. ft. 7his fee� is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The City Council may defer collection to the time a building permit is requested for individual lots created by such subdivision/lot split. 1�he City retains the option to accept an equivalent-amount in cash from the applicant far part or al� of tne portion required to be dedicated. PARK FEE AGREEMENT The undersigned understands that according to the City Platting Ordinance, the fo�low�ng public park land dedication is required to plat residential, commerciai or industrial Zoned property. It is further understood that the public park land dedication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretion of the City. It is agree� that a cash payment of $�O� `� will be paid according to the above stated policy for the following sub ivision/1ot split. It is agreed that the following land dedication is provicled according to the above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split: Dedication: Subdivision/lot split: The undersigned further agrees to notify a11 future property owners or assigns of the cash paS-rr=.ent requirement, if it is to be collected at the time of build�ng permit. DAT E_�� — �"� 00$4A/10G7A TME CITY OF FRtC�L Y DATE �rch i 7, 1982 DIRECTORATE oF puB��c woRics FROM D.pW, erro ��. ��, �� SUBJECT L.S. #82-Q3, Donna Miller - ann�ng ._, - � E—' '� • • • <1,,, .. - ,.,�.=� � i : • John Flora � MEMORANDUM ACTION INFO• X The Planning Commission, at their March 10, 1982 meeting, made a recommendation to the City Council for approval of L.S. #82-03 subject to a check on suitable road easement for East River Road across the eastern part of Lot 26, Auditor's Subdivision No. 23 Rev. We have checked with Anoka County to get an indication on the East River Road easement affecting this property. We have found that the County does in fact have a road easement and will not require any furtMer action by the City with this lot split request. JLB/de n N Loc4�'i o n CQ� AAM� s W F u � � � P < � � > � Dwn1� i�we � �� _ �-- rw./ �) � N �♦M��M� \ :,:.� � � ! s , , � C� : .s"" ��•� N ,� �initY :� � C � _ �. N i� tM�N� � C K �`,.L�"` «. rl�«�..� � i ,;1 rwou� en Ni�. ��« oo. a � - w�[�rous EMIMG l�Kf �MK IU�IL�L�' I.�II � I L` C C � ■ ! �J �8 L.S. #82-03 Donna Mil e �o ?� �o�� ,�. � a e; s . � W � =�+ � o�r n•� � \ � __ � � � � �jt� ) �t�_��'�.��J�.� ; ,.�,,.o�. ,. —� ..m � .,�..�...�*�. l � ,, ....,...... � �;� 1 TI7��:�a«it�:W �tL�� M ! ylY��4M � p � r-�.�� a� � � ...�.�. a. � � �'�'' I�`' �� ' a'u"�'.' �` ��%_��' �r�::��... + -- �j� � no..... 6S �%��lfl� I�Ir �� COLUMl1� � � I�IQNTS STREET MA.P-CITY OF FRI DLEY 0 �333 6,666 r ..., .� w.. _ _... _ . „ _ _._ _ . � - . . �K - _ ... � 22 , . .. .. . - � � L.S. #82-03, Donna Miller - '� . • • . � � R�' , . � �• . ti . • . �y � : �. � AVN � �iwwns�On Iw S�vlh /.wi �f ��.. � • I/� An/.i.l. :�ln'w�►u 7s i� A..ttD P. SfS �� 1 � d�� a, + � T� . ' j ��/!� , w�• '�in �� S�O , � • �� :I� 1 .tj T1r- �'��,1'/,�. � R��N�� ` f.�....��\ � 1 _ � f A'TK•r L ' � i .a� . _ _ R L � • ��+ �� =„ ; ,,,�,�';=- �=- -.-�.-�;�� c.�.�. �0 . . •'?'.-�� r,� * � , . �. � � �;� �� E« , .,� � � � � � ,� -, �� ,�••E , - �, j � � �� f� �► � ; . :� ��,cr...6. <n � .._,�$�'�.l� � �. , « M '� � �Qi485 .�� , .� ` r ��fl ,� � � � J � p�ACE �, ...,�..,..,, ; �- � � � .,�.a- .... �. � � . �A ��. �o J� ��stP� � . 3 8 � � � s ,. . ��_ � ,M �� .�� ti � _ �` ,,,n°� ,-� `^ ;�� ) t'E'O�i � .r �c'�, � .� .� • ' � � + �90 � ,� �p � w ��N i � 0,,�� ', j �R,�._�, - �oa, � M�,x � � � �. ;� �A � _ • r,� � �_�y �s ,+� � �) : �455 � ��taS> �. � 3 4 ��O � r ��7'. ; � c�'1i ��F � � q rc.r , � , � � - . �'� g {r , 3 � � ' ' t �,d�►r�i �'' �21?„ :�_-= ' � �°� � ; =, � � ; j� � - _ �� , � j� �! . t _ D` '' � ., . , • -- 1►45'� `6��'� � �' A'� �:��' . � d � � �' � � 1 �,,,�� 6411 � �� ... 43D� �b ,� a ,,, ; ,. (s�" � � ' •: :�.: t;.. tiG 3c Q: :.a �� ' k , 4 �, � �, : ,. ...� w � ! ? �:�:�� , ; :, �. �'y►,: i� l �4�� 1% : , 7b - � -'--° `� .s_ „ 2 �•�+ ': �Q � .:� ' r? - � 1 � \ � � , : '�+�; ��' � G , � �, �AIM�- � � � ' �. � ..� �C,,� �. . � , ., �: ► tb ,� _ ' 3' ',� ,• E� ` `.. ,«. r�i�� Ar�� 2� � p8 ', _ � �, . :•.`•:,.. � • `��,� .. � 4,TH . r�c' �t , •, � � ~' �� *� � "�� ~ ' � • , i � � •� ��! , - i , ��1 � � '�' 3!►�'� � � �' �a: �s 0 `°* � f°s� _ ` ,; �3 � �t:. � .... �o-� � r� ��,4�a ��,,� __ .. . ,, -^ � � � � � r, . `4 �., �� - 9t s / �' �1/ H� / ; � . - � u , (� ��. . � ,s,, Y r .. � M ' 21�t! T �, , ��, � ' i., r: N �.�'� Z � � � � i !i � ,,, o li4 ��r'�� ,, �''� � •� r' ��S` 1 � ,�,��" � y,s. #. pJ, 7�y3j� � L g s��l..r- �' � � t14% �s ,us,,��}'� j�' � �.: ;-�;�a A � � � `�'.�,�5 � 18 �,�' �,� � _-- -.� �:« ,� � ;� - t,�� . � � �' , 3 -- �`� �'io� `.• � . , +� 9 :. ....' � . 1 ' . ,�. (�.� !?�� ` . i� _ . J,,, , _—fa,3 �1l � � � a� d; 1�8= t'4b � � y :' �t� �� s t . 3 !/2 ��,33� �' ' :� V4t, l� �� " s '� 4 , � ,W 1d o � .� 3 � t _ � � v�r �► 8�-T ; � � ��-.;� 1� +�.� �.� . �-� ... i! rs s . � �, � I •~ • � . � f l�� ,� ;` � .. `3�b � ' ;1 S4 �S ., t6 = r! � 18: _ �- ! '� io � � �� . . .� a 6 ?-(� l� 1 � 3� I �� ' /"�i � ' �3 ! t3 � �Z�� . ��` �,3 0 � � - —:-'� � i�is , G ��, � �-- S� - — . _1i4f�lY .�!' 1�iF: �C! D ' � � � � .� . �r .� . lo, .r r ; $ - ,O- ,� ��' o ��q q4 �� 14 � s � �4 ,1 4 t � � :::�3RD i i ,.., `�4 , . � e � � � . � ,f , ; " ort t ,�. . i - g � ' �- ^ .. �r - � �- 11! ?! f! 71 I vf �i.. � _ l. . +: Z ( � /.� /.��.�'� •./ � . :�x6z�0 . ;6'�' �:'��5- z+` � � 4 � �'.. � � �� s l / Y. ��•; 6� / � t' ! :� ti . ` ' . * ri�t�• O� `�i µ�� °� •/ 1e�:v't+�{r��-i Sf( � \ l...' i � � . � ��d�sf � F ,�'! ' sIr �....F r 'a' �'4-- �ir 7 • � K L �'- �y.s' c;p �. � . � ,� 6�n22�.�s`�`2+i . �` ._��i ..� {}i:�"'�'f�,:--�',�� '/�� , � 2� b`' �'- ' � js _ f`"_ " � a' - ��;ai �t � b�gp'.� �±,< ; �•�6! , J � ; 1��!� / � �.J ��.7�y r ` �.M1.�,�4'1. ; � �+J'* 2 ��' / i:r. .��`� iL, ��ir�i � ! h �� ! �f./rg ��r 4 � --X!r ZL� � Ws•et ,�/..Jf) ^' � (OZ%Or � : M , . � �!; 'T .t�2i .Rf TS ' ` o t.< . - :;,t �+�� _ f• ,' ,� /j ' � �" � � 62 !/2 � . . ' � � � _+ �--� r,•o�+i� ''.'` � t � � .• f: �-w `s• r.? s Y'.,� 'i :r ' : r°rti t^1 �7 O.� a �- ��.:�5 8L _ ----- - ----- - v 2� \ L.S. #82-03 Donna Miller , ` \7 (� � �o � - �2 �� / `� �,�'i , 9 � �- \ , .,�,.� � _ �J � / 1' 1 �' '\ / � \ \ i i � "E' .i. � o � � .o � .�. .- .� ,� � N _ � \ \ -.r- O � � � \ Z � O s Q c`�P1 � � N + t� �� y �'� � � �° �, ' � � �' _ �� '� t � . .,- i �, T� � ^, • \ �S-� 1 �- �D \ % � � � � �\ � � . io -- k � " '� �� 's` G C� 3 � ` ` � i '' � � �' 13��p c, � � � � � s � 5�5 I � � • � . � � �o � � � Q � =,� i �� -' o ` ` o L• 1 ` n � 'n•�- O'� � J o V ' c.^ z �, . . � /j �' : ` � �S' �� %► � � _: = l— `r s � � `J C u '� � � ,� o `� .b -�1 � .� -• � �v t' \ \ t R1 �� `3� � • i ��" G �� Q �' 0 lh ,.-� -J `� � � � O � � }' , ` � G � ,� O ' . , - s O ti�'I.�% '� � � r• �.. �� - ,�,,� ` �� .1 �, 1 i�'�� J "� �- � s G .� �� _t� � v .\ C` � � � � `, � o � o � : p r p / . � � _.�, A �� c, ,� } �-_, ` ` `, � � � - i � J i ' i+a�-,. � y„ � `� � il '� �� 8� 2 � \ R�, o° � � ` -'� t� ` � � 6n�' � � :'" -�", L� - (��-r ` - � <fl / - �� , `r ` U N� oe � �OP` � � ��° �o'�' � �,� 5� �\� � � _ �� L.S. #82-03 Donna Miller 20 TRACT 1: : That part of Lot 1, Block 1, VEIT'S 2ND ADDITION and of Lot 26, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 23, REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota which lies southwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, thence on an assumed bearing of S74°50'W along the northwest line of said Lot 1 a distance of 140.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence S]5°10'E a distance of 137.79 feet to the southeast line of said Lot 26 and there terminating. Contains 17,172 square feet. TRACT 2: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, VEIT'S 2ND ADDITION and of Lot 26, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 23, REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota described as commencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 1, thence on an assumed bearing of S74°50'W along the northwest line of said Lot 1 a dist- ance of 140.00 feet to the point of beginning of thc tract to be described; thence S15°10'E a distance of 137.79 feet to the southeast line of said Lot 26; thence N74°50'E a.long said southeast line a distance of 75.00 feet; thence N15°10'�J a distance of 137.79 feet to the northwest line of said Lot I; thence S74°50'W a2ong said northwest line a distance of 75.�0 feet to the point of beginning. Contains 10,334 square feet. TRACT 3: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, VEIT'S 2ND ADDZTION and of Lot 26, AUDZTOR'S SUBUIVISION NO. 23, REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota which lies northeasterly of the following described line: Corunencing at the most northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence on an assumed bearing of S74°50'W along the northwest line of said Lot 1 a distance of 65.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence S15°10'E a distance of 137.79 feet to the southeast line of said Lot 26 and there terminating. Contains 11,927 square feet. NOTE: � In order to facilitate building on these tracts, it would seer� appropriate to vacate the 6 foot drainage and utility easement created by VEIT'S 2ND ADDITION and to create a new easement as follows: An easement for drainage and utility purposes over the westerly and southerly 6 feet of Lot 26, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISON NO. 26, REVISED, Anoka County, Minnesota. also, the City may wish to consider acquiring the northeast 28.58 feet of Lot 26, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISON N0. 23, REVISED since it appears that for the last few years it has been using this nroperty for EAST RIVER ROAD. Contains 2141 square feet. also, a variance for frontage below the 75 foot minnimum would have to be consi@ered on Tract 1. 0 � , 1981 POLICY STA7EMENT ON PARK FEES ON LAND SUBDIVISION Date L.S. #82-03 17 In determining fair market value of public areas for land subdivision for cash payment, as required by Ordinance 633, the following values wi1T be used: Residentia7 sUbd�vision $1,000.40 per lot Residential lot split � 500.00 per lot Commerciai/Industria� subdivision or lot splits � 0.015 per sq, ft. This fee• is to be paid at the time of final plat or lot split approval. The City Council may defer collection to the time a builcing permit is requested for individual lots created by such subdivision/lot split. The City retains the option to accept an equivalent amount in cash from the applicant for part or all of the portion required to be �edicated. PARK FEE AGREEMENT The undersigned understands that according to the City Platting Ordinance, the following public park land dedication is required to piat residential, commercial or industrial zor.ed property. It is further understood that the public park land dec�ication or cash payment equivalent is at the discretion of the Cit.v. ,� �: a: c: It is agreed that a cash payment of $��+� wi11 be paid according to the above stated policy for the fol)owing subdivision/�ot split. It is agreed that the following land dedication is provided according to the above stated policy for the following subdivision/lot split: Dedication: Subdivision/Tot split: The undersigned further agrees to notify all future property o�vners or assigns of the cash payment requirement, if it is io be coiiected at th� time ��' building permit. DATE OOII4A/106�A �/ roperty u►vner � �� '}�� - �.�i' M a �yn�'r .��,... � : _ � � s s;,^ , > �,�{��.. �:Y �'.. r ,,�. y3 • €r � . .: % ��" .;4, * r � ��. {� �` '�' �� Y 1 ' i� ,� x � , �-, ;-:� t.�,�:� ., �,x . �f�S Y �� . a�?-.� -- �'.. 8� �� ■ 6431 UNtVEASITY AVENIIE N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 Allan B. Stahlberg �t'� 305 II9th Avenue N.E. `'� 8laine, M�V 55432 CT�Y Ca��CIL ACTIOPI TAKFtd NO'TiCE TELEPMONE (612)571-3450 lvovember 17, 19$0 Cn �fovember 10, 14�9 .= , the Fridley City Council of7;cia7ly approved your request for an extension of our S_ pecial�Use�Permit SP ;78-10 with tFte stipulations 7isted below: �'� ��Ver��ew errace N�` 1. This Special Use Permit has been extended until �lay,1982. 2. This is the last extension of this Special Use Perr�it. If the special use permit needs further extension beyond May, 1982, the entire Specia7 Use Permit wiil have to be reviewed. If you have any questions regard�ng the above act�on, oieasL caZl the Con,munity �evelopr�ent Offi�e at 571-3450. JLBjde Since�-eiy, ' P.ULU L.. 8� +r',i)�';�;i•! _ C� ty P1 an;�4r Please revieN► the not�d stipulations, si�n the s1.:a �em�nt b�lo�v, and r•e��rr� one copy to the City �f �'ridley. � L'on�ur �vith action takPn. � . . _.. _--- --.-_. __........._ .- - ------�-�--� -------- ; . _ . ---- ---: .__.,.� : .� �_ _ : _:_ _ � - -�-�--- : - - --�-�- , :. _ . �s� a PUBLIC HEARIN6 MEETING Of NOVEMBER 10, 1980 IRD EXTENSION OF F NEW HOt�tE IfJ FL PAGE 9 T, SP �73- RVICW. TERR -- 8 P Mr. Flc,ra, Public Works Director, stated a sp�cial use permit was originally granted to Mr. Stahlberg in September, 1978 witii several requests for extension to the sprir.g of 1980 and tF�en to September 1380. He stated the City again receiv�ad another request, in September 1980 , for extension of the special use permit. He stated the basic reason for delay in construction has been the inabil�ty of Pir. Stahlberg to obtain financing. Mr. Flora felt, if this reques�: is to be granted, Ptr. Stahlberg would probably need at least 18 months in order to obtain financing since he has a new job, but must be employed contin;ially for a year in order to qualify for a:loan. Mr. Flora indicated he had no problems with the proposed construction, but felt t�2is should probably be the last extension granted, and if they have anothe�• request, the special use permit should again be reviewed. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to grant an extension of the special use permit. SP #78-10 to Al1en Stahlberg until May, 1982. Seconded by Councilwoman Moses. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Ma_�or �dee declared the motion carried unanimcusly. F ENTERING INTO COOPERATIVE PL'RCHASI�dG AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA COUP�TY: Mr. reshi, City Manager, requested the Council consider entering into a cooper� ive purchasing agreement with Anoka C�unty. Mr. Qureshi pointed out health in rance costs would be substantially lower with Anoka County, rather than H�nnep' County. However, Blue-Cross/Bl��e Shield would not be available, therefore, s employees who have this coverage may be unhappy. He stated current.ly there �t�uut 29 employees who fave this coverage. Counci':man Schneide stated he can see the benefit, as far as cost goes, but could �ee�an employee point who had a doctor with Blue-Cross/alue Shield and didn't arant to chan . He indicated he did have a concern if that option wasn't available. Mr. �V"CShI stated the possib ities of obtaining fee for service coverage such a., Blue-Cross/Blue Shield rough Anoka County, haven't really been fully explored and this could be ne, however, the coverage may not be available. Mr. Qureshi pointed out the City will h e to notify Anoka County by this Idednesday, if they want to be part of the lan. MOTIOW by Councilwoman htoses to approve th� C erative Purchasing Agreement with Anoka County. Seconded by Councilman Sch: ider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion car 'ed unanimously. RESOLUTIOtd tJO. 115-1980 TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FCR 198 �It�DUSTRIAL TYPE TRACTOR: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. �15-1980. Seconded by Counci�man Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Ptajfqr Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �� RESOLl,TION N0. 116-1980 TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR ANIM.AL CONTROL:`+� MOTIOiJ by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resoution ?�o. 116-19Ei0. Seconded by Counciiman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.• . E:� Allan B. Stahlberg, Special Use Permit SP #78-10, to allow construction of dwelling at 8053 Riverview Terrace N.E, in CPR-2 Zoning. August 30, 1978. Applicant applied for Special Use Permit Segtember 27, 197�. Planning Com�►ission recommended approval to Council. Items brought out in meeting were; 1. House basement floor elevation is to be 2`3�" above flood level. 2. DNR has no negative comments regarding developRnent. 3. The elevation, a distance of 15 f eet around the building, is well above the requirement of 2 feet above flood pZain level. 4. No objections from adjoining property owners. 5. Should have no sewer or drainage problems. October 23, 197� Counci]. approved request without any stipulations. 5eptember 10, 1979 Applicant asked for an extension of the Special Use Permit until the spring of 1980. No reasons given. September 24, I979 Council granted a 6 month extension. Applicant was not at the meeting to give reasons. March 13, 1980 Applicant asked for a second 6 month extension as he was having trouble obtaining financirig for construction of dwelling. April 7, 1980 Council approval the second extension until October 7, 1980. September 19, 1980 Applicant is asking for a third extension - for a time period of one year. � N s a �wrc �;.: . �tM�/ . �I �__ COON IIY10� i:. . a r �� I u rla� �- • •w��s.. � W i � = P � Z � � �� \ � Q � W � � 11 D.rno.� kaN \ nss , � . : � ,� ! C� r,t �"r! ` ��ni�Y :� � t�� / ..�.w�a. � N �•,�� .M•. .. t w �. I 1 AIIW(A b`Q, � ..�. N�II �IM CQ NM1NEArOLtS L c � � e ■ f ��Q i �� fMIMG l�ucE ►M�c )UU� [��'�It� �� (h'x�N) �a� i:. " • � � -; ! r� � � p�� \ � � � `—�� f � ��C� u 65 � � � �• � � �� -� � ��I�� ``. s, � � � �� Jt'�� ,....aa..,. � :. �', :� —1 �---� w� [�� wwr c. `� ��h�= i, >�iw�ww �r+wr^ � M� +w.' = �' • `; � - �j+�g �, ��/(��\,� o� ...4.... a.. �. F �_.��)`a' ;;-.�... �. �� lfry"�'^=��C ^� �ii.MV�COC R 1� `. nr=�i� �'� `� COLUMI� � K IIEIOMTS STREET MA.P-CITY OF FR! DLEY O 3�33� s,sss . . . .� ��'Ir�+?.t �YY'.7�:k R?h .G:39EflJlh'ii . • � . � ,� - .. � � • � �i � . �• � � � ��.�! • i I � i ' - SP #78=10 �"a�': �`:�I� �i�� aLt��'t�d>� f: � ', ; ; . j.: . • _ $ S � f ._ { � . ✓'��1 '. r . .. � • ' c'• !J � �at�r,.i �"= ��p: h Stahl berg .. c- c�, �`:_i' .:- �f� ! u . i . - . . .fv.i7lt�` C,��.;Y"Ya.`�`Dl" _ , • ' . �/ • • � ' t.� F I- � _ .G l�t a.�'I. } E.'.�"� _.C„b'a.�..i:1S.�� %y G"i4 !' t • *s �!i% ' n�. y �� ;sj'1 � � . . . . . � � ,• r � ..� .��- s• .C:i.�'1....tvr �: .�A v'�J'vtCw ✓Ll.� ' ' • , � . . Cc;rii:�c,�t� �P' ��r;�t�; ��a: A��an St�-�h�htr� . ' ' . . . - - . .-- .. . ' - • •_ T .. , � � • ' : • . . `� -. � 13.�ccri�y��ta: � o�s 2�, 24, 25 f�t�1 2fi,. �3�o�-ic. U, RIVF.R�JZEtJ �lEIGI�i5�_ Iti�ok�.�CauZty, -" ;? }� iiZ'tit�,y��t. � ' • - ' ' K ; Su3jLc� �� e�se*�r��r of xec4rc� � . � �. ..'• ' �• - . . .- • - • . . :.. • ... • - • �":-��t . . ' ��if_ 2P.. f t , ` - . - • : c ' , � � _ . : - • - ' �� - �_� , �ncYa ._,Fic` �To� �,. }{y:�ran�� Sout'heasti c;z�drznt of R�vex-vi.ea Terrac�1 an3 ' • {� �'ri.r,;:�:�� S�.�c�:��:• �:l_��ation• G2S.O:i _ . . -- . - _ .. . � � � � 11i�:� :��i:��= I'rcf�► rFcords of City uf Fric2l.ey; 822 � � ' .r''' • �: ' ' - f �;=` _ . -. : : _' � _ . .90� .�'. . . - . . . ��`J` �� ' . '. : • , � .i-'''-:.�� '.'- 1 - . . ,_ . ' ' f��C' . t - � . . - � � '��..:- ''"'---- .� ; • . � , ' � :� �o k3. �.� o � . `.: : � - _ . � :� . �. ...--- : . . _ . . . -. . . :,��-- �- �-� _ . . � - . ^ ; F - ;, s ,, . • . • ' ,r'' ��` � �" • . . � � . ti�. � �� . . �►°'rp� -• ~ a � �j`+ . �. `' _ : � - --_ - . . �• •- ". _. . , �� y��s :. _ __ .. �_� .. . . . . U�, - ..�--��a � - _ . � � . - `. . - _ . . :, -. . : . o f��. ia�'�?�'�5.jt5 g"+� � - � p . . �.� . " �" . . : � . � U � r+s►�'G�''� =- - _ ��{ ' J . a " , . � ' � � ; - � �j �'�'f � ^4� ., - . . • � ! '•.� �,� ,r�� .�;�'r`��"` _ �'�� - _. . . ' r�� , � :,�' � ,, p� � �� . � � . . . _ . . . � - . �� . . n�� . ��.v �'� f,�i/F`�' . . .� 'r'^� . • . .- rt . - , . . . y..� , + . ..� �' i �t/,r- . � �/"►"'�'�. , s . .'�. . F � � � - ...,.�s � iQ � �-��"._ �... . 1 , _ • �. p �3�'~� �r� '! p��... ��. . � _ ' � 0 : - R � �`� • � ' �� ..F � ,. . Q : ^:" - .1 I . � ;� " �,� � - R�" • ;� . - � �. ,,• c, f. � * � �� t,�; , i; • � ' en� - - - � � � . - -t3 �'..:,, + � `�. \� ' ,,3 ��sGn? . p:�' �' y . : --p • �-'° � � � � `'�. rt? ` �� f� t;�`Y .� - ; g�"� ° ;t �c.n � �i3.: .-- # � G �. � �c f --,''-- ,,7� ! S� � � � ' `'�''C� p, Sfj - ' .T��-1 _ • . , . ,'�}� o } y„r--- � ., _ 1._ �.� � � .: :..� -:-. . � ��.�� , -: ��. - • :... � �-�-�-r' - -_ -� ti ' A t �'� •�° y '�� ` _ = �, ',,,.,r- ,''.,.. . � ., . � t"`t t'� ' . �' �i ��' �� '-''�`. -- :9�a t �- . f . .� � ' �� .:--r-:�'' :y - �..�- . _ . '"'` . e.'r � - ; , _ - � . _ ~a, , �-y � � � � � C� �: . � ,�;�� ; �3� �� .��'' `,cr'�f-C• '"� . _ = ,�� • � �^ . / �'["� . ' ,r R • ��,� 0` _;r- r : �''� ' . , - • , . f�. . .�14� .� . • . �� - . • : : . ��.,� 77-��• K : � .' � _ . � . . r � � . . � . ' . . . . i� 4 � r . . ' � . � � - . . . � .. .. t � . - . _ � � . . . . . . . . .. _ .. . . . " . . .' .. ' . , _ . . ... . . , ' . . . � � �' �. ' :.� . : � � . . " ' } . . .. �� ,,,.� � .`� , � � haxoby o�r��x'y ttzat thla` ottrray�. #��u�, br • �;r . .r�yor.i ��e j�ro�.iroc� b;: �r�9 .or u:�cjer �� c�ix-ro�� . . -� �, �,. : ��, Gu�fl.rolsio;� e�ct �hai. I r..� tt. �uly P.ep3�ta::+�:I::. � .. !TF/l3i �.�`�'�'��. � La,,-�ci 5c.z-c �yor Exncax ��:� � ��c3 0£ tho 5�i1ta a�' • s . .. . ► �. . , � . , . . ki.x � • us •o � / / , � v�� _ . a- 77- r¢ � _� `Ur.��.��J�'.�..-� . . • / � - � . ; { 3 � .�t—' !'Y r' p �� " ��' �� ,� . - -�-- .�, . r. � o_r. z� ,� n�ts /.s' f � _ _ � ��-�,9��'.�'',,% .:_� , ?"� � Ra�. 2�0. ii7o� (�� , - _. CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Telephone: 571-3450 T0: CITY COUNCIL pqTE; March 17, 1982 FROM: Chuck Boudreau SUBJECT: Bid results for 1982 one ton truck with dump body On March 11, sealed bids for a 1982 one ton truck with dump body were opened. This truck is a budgeted item to replace a 19i6 one ton Chevrolet, unit 567, for our Park division. After reviewing the attached bid sheet to see that all bids were in keeping with the specifications, I would recommend that the bid be awarded to Superior Ford in the amount of $11,168. This amount does include a$550 rebate to the City of Fridley if our order is placed prior to Apri1 1, 1982. If you have any questions concerning the specifications or bid summarization, please feel free to contact me. CAB/ja 9 ----� ol�l � �� i i N W � H � U Z �--� 3 F— C O O 3 � ¢ c� U E G3 U , Q �--� 1-- Z O d W c3 � � ""� � � � � J C.7 p� W 0 Z .. � Z N L� W � d t�-. O N N O � �G � � � � H m � "" � F— V � �-r � � = O U V- � � � W � O m 0 � O ti. J W m W O c.3 f-- � Q � 01 Ol � .--� O � �1 n N M .--i � � N L � � ) t •r- • +� � � 3 0 ) C W 1— i F— � ln r0 N � Q O 'v O aJ Z U C U v1 t0 aJ O J d-� .__l •r ? �L tn ._ � �L 1— 1— � � O : O � 1 N L +�-� N lD �+ L � M 4- LL fh •-i �--� O J � r L.C) U' O O � v� � �.n O �O � 69 v �c • a rts v O U � N 4- O � � L- O 3 � c� +� N i. 1--- N 'p U1 �C L +-� C'S 1 1 O �6 � C o\° �I-- 41 O l.C) •r S.. � I�O —'I J C W �-, p m Q i ii 9 �', T � - O u � � L - v �c � � r . � 7 O � i O � M L.L � i O � � w H a Y ►F'-+ '—' c� � m _ ~ O � = Z F-- O E 0 �- °- � � � o 0 o z .. � , oG Z N Q lL W � Z a r'-+ , O O N � � � �- .� � f-- Ca .-r U f..� r+ = Y U � _ � � J ~ w o x� ¢o J LL. � . -� . V C'3 2 LL �-+ � N � NW �..,,, Q Q m ¢ N O J �S Z N�I ��I u F— C C •r L.L N Q O � � W F— L I— � (/3 rQ N � ¢ o -v o v Z U C tJ vi ,n tl� [� _1 / � _J •.- L �L V� �L 'p �1 f— � I— \ n- �—, � � � �„ � � N � � � 1 N � � E � S� C � v � � • � F�R CONCURRENCE SY THE CITY COUNCIL MaRCH 22, 1982 CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER �, SECTIONS I�OZ AND I�O3 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED ��LEGISLATIVE BODY'� RELATING TO WARD AND PRECINCT BOUNDARIES WITHIN THE CITY �MAPS AND PERTINENT MA7ERIAL ARE IN THE AGENDA FOLDER) �� ATE ROM BJECT PUBLIC VF�O��S MAINTENANCE March 5, 1982 Ralph Volkman Chassis-Mounted Pothole Patcher Justification �AE��14�DUIiA i�T�7 John Flora 11� TIONI INFC x Normally every year in this climate, we experience a continuous problem of potholes appearing in our asphalt streets. Now new equipment and methods have entered t}ie market to improve the efficiency of asphalt pothole patching. Of the various pieces of equipment we looked at and tested, the chassis-mounted pothole patcher performed the tasks of patching with less equipment and man- power. The unit is a combination heater and dispenser. It heats the asphalt road oils and premixed llot or cold asphalt aggregates to elevated temperatures for easy distribution in potholes and patches. This unit can patch in almost any weather conditions. Tllis would allow the street crews to patch earlier in the spring and continuously throughout the year as the need arises. Because the pothole patcher requires less manpower and equipment than most methods, it allows more street maintenance persollnel to perform other needed maintenance tasks normalTy rescheduled until pothole patcliing is completed. The asphalt material is moved into the pothole by hydraulic controls and the tools are powered by the same hydraulics. After our observations of the performance and efficiency of this equip- ment, I recorrm�end that we purchase the chassis-mounted pothole patcher. There is $18,000 allocated in the 1982 Public tiNorks Maintenance budget for this. tiVe have an existing 1975 International Harvester cab and chassis, No. 768, to be used for this installation. In the specifications for bids, an optional lease purchase agreement is also called for. The optional lease �aill help us deter- mine what financial route to take to purchase this t.mit. Please let me lmow if you need any additional information. RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS CHASSIS MOUNTED POTHOLE PATCHER BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Fridley, as follows: 1. That it is in the interest of the City to award bid contracts for the following items or materials. CHASSIS MOUNTED POTHOLE�PATCHER 2. A copy of the specifications for the above described items and materials, together with a proposal for the method of purchase and the payment thereof have been presented to the Council by the City Manager and the same are hereby approved and adopted as the plans and specifications, and the method of acquisition and pay- ment to be required by the City with respect to the acquisition of said items and materials. 3. The purchase of said items and materials as described above shall be effected by sealed bid� to be received and opened b,y the City of Fridley on the 14th day of APril, 1982. The City Manager is directed and authorized to advertise for the purchase of said items and materials by sealed bid proposals under notice as provided by law and the Charter of the City of Fridley, the notice to be substantially in form as that shown by Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of by reference. Said notice shall be published at least twice in the official newspaper of the City of Fridley. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _ DAY OF � 1982. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SIDNEY INMAN - CITY CLERK 11 A �ti CITY OF FRIDLEY BID NOTICE for CHASSIS MOUNTED POTNOLE PA7CHER EXHIBIT "A" The City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota will accept seaied bids for Chassis-Mounted Pothole Patcher on the 14th day of April, 1982 untii 11:00 AM said date at the Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432 (telephone: 571-3450). All bids must meet the mir�imum requirements of the specifications. Failure to comply with this s�ction can result in disqualifications of the bid. - Each bid shall be accompanied by a Certified Check, Cashier's Check, Cash or Bid 8ond and made payable without conditions to the City of Fridley, Mi�nesota, �n an amount of not less than five percent (5�) of the bid, wnich • check, cash, or bond 5ha11 be forfeited if bidder neglects or refuses to enter into contract, after his bid has b�en accepted. The City reserves the right to accept the bid which is determined to be in the best interests of the City. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and waive any informalities or technicalities in any bid received without explanation. The City Council also reserves the right to consider such f actors as time of delivery or performance, experience, responsibility of the bidder, past performance, of similar types of items or materials, availability of products and other similar f actors that it may determine to be in the best interest of tne City. • Gopies of the specifications and general conditions may be examined in the office of the Purchasing Agent, or copies may be obtained from his office. Ali bids must be submitted in sealed envelopes and plainly marked on the outside with .CHASSIS MOUNTED POTHOLE PATCNER . Nasim Qureshi City Manager .... - Publ ish: �riclley Sun March 24, 1982 . March 31, 1982 d ii�.;,:,,9.�', �� /,,, �- � _ �� ;�o._� � ��, .'► �� POLICE DEPARTMENT City of Fridley Minnesota DATE March 18, 1982 FROM James P. Hill SUBJECT Towing Contract MEMORANDUM TO Nasim Qureshi �. ACTION INFO X Enclosed you will find a letter from Shorty's Towing Service requesting an increase i.ri� contract towing rates due to inflation. The last rate increase was approved by City Council on April 7, 1980. I recommend approval of this request based on the following: l. Owners are Fridley residents. 2. Business is located in our city. 3. 4. 5. Requested rates are competitive with area towing companies. Requested rates are the same as charged to the State Patrol. No storage charges are required unless vehicle is held over 12 hours. Should City Council prefer an alternative, the contract could be re-bid. JH/la �� Shorty's Towing Service 5755 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 March 18, 1982 James P. Hill Public Safety Director City of Fridley 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Hill: Due to the high cost of overall business expenses, including operating expenses, taxes, gas maintenance and licenses, we find it necessary to request an increase in our current to��ing contract rates. The requested rate increases are the same as we charge to the Minnesota Highway Patrol and the same that we will request to the City of Columbia Heights upon expiration of our contract in May of this year. CURRENT Inside Storage $5.75 Outside 5torage $4. 00 Accidents not to exceed $2a.75 hr. (average $17.25) Non-Accident Day Calls $17.25 Non-Accident Night Calls $17.25 Dolly Service $11.50 Snowmobile�� $17.25 Snowbirds $17. 25 REQUE$TED Inside Storage $5.75 Outside Storage $4.00 Accidents not to exceed $33.00 hr. (average $23.00) Non-Accident Day CaZls $23. 00 Non-Accident Night Calls $23. 00 Dolly Service � 15. 00 Snowmobile $23.00 Snowbirds 523.00 CURRENT (Cont.) Trailer (Small) $17. 25 Motorcycle $17.25 Police Cars no charge Cancelled Calls no charge Page 2 IZ $ REQUESTED (Cont.) Trailer (Small) $23. 00 Motorcycle $23. 00 Police Cars no charge Cancelled Calls no charge We feel that our request is competitive with area towers and below the Minneapolis and St. Paul rates. Your approval of the rate request increase would be appreciated. , Shorty's Towing Service 1982 TOWING CONTRACT SURVEY * Columbia Heights Police Dept. Shorty's Towing $15.00 - Tow car 25.00 - Tow truck 10.00 - Wench/dolly - plus 4.00 - Storage outside 5.00 - Storage inside Coon Rapids Palan's, 11400 Foley $20.00 - Towing daytime 24.00 - Towing nighttime 15.00 - Wench/dolly 4.00 - Storage of auto 2.50 - storage of cycle 24.00 - Flat bed tow charge Brooklyn Center Bill West, 2100 57th Avenue No. $20.00 - Towing daytime 25.00 - Towing nighttime Winch - extra charge 4.00 - per day storage 12 C *This is third year of a three year contract. Contract expires in May, Z982. New rates will be bid the same as Fridley's. (Capt. Kline didn't know how much) New Brighton Sroga's Towing, St. Anthony $23.00 - Towing daytime 23.00 - Towing nighttime 23.00 - Snowbird 15.00 - Snowmobi:le 15.00 - Standard trailer 15.00 - Motorcycle 20.00 - per hour - accident tow 5.00 - Inside storage 3.00 - Outside storage Blaine Police Department Blue Tow, Spring Lake Park $20.00 - per car towing N.C. - Police vehicles 40.00 - Semi-trucks, trailers 25.00 - Accident with clean up 20.00 - Dolly/wench - extra 35.00 - per hour when exceptionally far each wrecker required 45.00 - Flat bed heavy equipment is required 4.00 - per day for storage beginning on the day it is brought in 12D AMENDMENT CONTRACT FOR�THE TOWING, STORAGE AND IMPOUNDING OF VEFiICLES FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY Effective March 23, 1982, Section 4 to the agreement entered into the 18th day of November, 1974, by and between Shorty's Towing Service, 5755 University Avenue N. E., and the City of Fridley, 6431 University Avenue N. E., is hereby amended to read: BY: 4. The rate per day for inside storage shall be $5.75. The rate per day for outside storage shall be $4.00. Storage fees shall not be charged for vehicles held less than Z2 hours. Towing rates shall be uniformly charged to all owners of vehicles. The rate for towing shall be as follows: Accidents Non-Accident-Day Calls Non-Accident Night Calls Dolly Service Snowmobile Snow Bi.rds Trailer (Small) Motorcycle Police Cars Cancelled Calls MAYOR BY: CITY MANAGER City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 DATE: Not to Exceed $33.00 Per Hour $23.Q0 Pe� Call $23.00 Per Call $15.00 Per Call $23.00 Per Call $23.00 Per Call $23.00 Per Call $23.00 Per Call No Charge No Charge BY: Shorty's Towing Service 5755 University Avenue N. F. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 DATE: � T0: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Sid Inman G>;; -�- � Mervin Herrmann Board of Review Meeting Date March 19, 1982 0 0 � The County Assessor called to have the above meeting in Fridley on May 18, 19 or 20, 1982. I told them that Mr. Qureshi felt very strongly about having these meetings in conjunction with either our regular Council meetings or our Public Hearing meetings, which are always on Mondays. I was told that Monday, May 17, they already had three meetings, therefore it would have to be on May 24th as May 3rd and May lOth are too early to get their work done that is left to be done. I do expect a large turnout this year due to the heavy increase in taxes over last year. 13 14 FAR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY C�UNCIL - CLAIMS CLAIf�1 ��l;��BERS 060G21 - 078C0° 0 � F.OR CONCURRENCE 8Y THE CtTY C�UNCIL - LICE'J�S March 22, 1982 Type of License- Auctioneers Fridley h1ethod�st Church 666 Mississippi St. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Billiards George is in Fridley 3720 E. River Rd. Frid)ey, P�n. 55421 Cigarette Barry Blower Div. 99 - 77th 4Jay �d.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Country Club 6257 Highway #65 Fridley, P1n. 55432 Country Kitchen 280 - 57th Place N.E. Fridiey, Mn. 55432 Fireside Rice Bowl 1160 Fireside Dr. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Bottle Shop 6289 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 � Ronald Andrle Advance Carter Servomation Corp. Country Club Mkt.Inc. Brandon Prop. Inc. Qliver Tam Advance Carter Co. Godfather Pizza of Mn.Inc. James Gallup 7910 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holiday Station Store 5807 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holly Center Liquor 6586 tJniversity Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holiday Warehouse PJo. 250�- 57th Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Les's Standard 7680 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holiday Stores Inc. Advance Carter Co. Erickson Bros. L. Schaffran ., Approved By: James P. Hill Public Safeiy Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hi11 Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Qirector James P. Nill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Pubiic Safety Director 15 Fees: Exempt $100.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.OQ $12.OQ $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 0° � F.OR CONCURRENCE BY TNE CITY COUNClL - LICE'JSES ,,,' March 2�,, 19A� Cont. ' Onan Corp. 1400 - 73rd Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 100 Twin Drive-In 5600 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Pulaski's 6259 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Q Petroleum 5300 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, 41n. 55432 Q Petroieum 6101 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sandee's Inc. 6490 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 Servomation Corp. 7490 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Mkt. Tnc. 6290 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Mkt. Inc. 6071 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Strite Anderson 7585 Viron Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 Target Headquarters 108Q - 73rd Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Tom Thumb 315 Osborne Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Totino's Foods 7350 Commerce Lane N.E. Fridiey, �1n. 55432 Western Stores 7600 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Servomation Corp. James P. Hill Public Safety Director Boston Conc. Group, Inc. James P. Hill � Public Safety Director Or's Corp. P1arl i n P.. Bes 1 er Marlin R. Besler William F. Weiss Dale Wick R.H. Jahnson R.H. Johnson Servomation Corp. Servomation Corp. Herbert Koch ARA Food Serv. „ Continental Oil Co. James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hiil Public Safety Director James P. Hiil Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director l5 A Page 2 $96.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 $I2.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.Q0 $12.00 $12.00 $36.00 $12.00 $12.00 $12.00 � � F.OR CONCURRENCE 8Y THE CITY COUNClL - LICE'J�S ,F March 22, 7982 _____,�,� Cont' Discharge A Firearm Stanton 0. Berg 6025 Gardena Lane PJ.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Entertainment Ground Round 5277 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Pulaski's 6259 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Food Establishment Country Club b257 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 Country Kitchen 280 - 57th Place N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Dairy Queen 280 Mississippi St. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fireside Rice 8ow1 1160 Fireside Dr. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley A & W Rest. 7429 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Covenant Church 6390 University Ave.N.E. Fridley,Mn. 55432 Godfathers Pizza 7910 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Ground Round 5277 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Holiday Station Store 5807 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Same Howard Johnson Co. Or's Corp. Country Club Mkt. Brandon Prop. Donald Fitch Oliver Tam D.L. Christensen G.L. Powele James Galiup Howard Johnson Holiday Stores,, Inc. � James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. H�11 Public Safety Director Steven J Dlson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J.Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Qlson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector 0 �.5 B Page 3 $25.00 $85.00 $85.00 $45.00 $45.OQ $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 Exempt $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 � � F,OR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - LICE`JSES March 22. 1982 � Cont'. Holiday l�larehouse No. Erickson Bros. 250 - 57th Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Judy's Home Style Hamb. John Kubinski 7850 University Ave. PJ.E. - Fridley, Mn.55432 Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Kentucky Fr. Chicken K.F.C. Natl. Magt.Inc. Steven J. Olson 7510 University Ave. N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Learning Tree Center Joseph Barnett Steven J. Olson 5310 h1onroe St.�N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn.55432 Lindquist Cake & Dec. 5247 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Mc Donalds Of Mn. 5831 University Ave. N.E. Fridiey, Mn. 55432 Medtronics, Inc. 6970 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 N.B.C. Whoie Foods Inc. 1315 Rice Cr. Rd. Fri dl ey, h1n. 55432 100 Twin-Drive-In 560� Central Ave.Pd.E. Fridley, �1n. 55432 Parkview Elem. School 6'085 - 7th St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Pulaski's 6259 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Q Petroleum � 5300 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Q Petroleum 6101 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 Sandee's Inc. 6490 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 James Lindquist Mc Donalds Servomation Corp. Same Boston Concc. Vol. of America Or's Corp. Marlin R. Besler Marlin R. Besler William Weiss � Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Tnspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector 15 C Page 4 $45. 00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.Q0 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 Exempt $45.00 �45.00 $45.00 $45.00 n D� F.OR CONCURRENCE 8Y THE CtTY COUNCtL - LICE'J�S March.22, 1932 : Cont'. Tom Thumb 3I5 Osborne Rd. Fridley, Mn, 55432 Totion's Foods 7350 Commerce Ln.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Unity Medical Center 550 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Western Stores 7600 University�Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Tom Thumb Food Mkt. The Pillsbury Co Same Ldestern Stores Div. Woodcrest Baptist Academy Clarke S. Poorman 6875 University Ave.N.E. � Fridley, Mn. 55432 WQOdcrest School Dist.16 David Haram 880 Osborne Rd. N.E. . Fridley, Mn. 55432 Zantigo 5905 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Food Vehicle Rainbow Wagon 6750 Pdain St. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Off Sa1e Beer Country Club Market 6257 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holiday Warehouse No. 250 - 57th Ave.N.E. Fridley, PAn. 55432 Holiday Station.Store 5ii07 University Ave.N.E. Frictley, Mn. 55432 Huson Oil Co. of Deleware 7315 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Q Petroleum Corp. 5300 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 KFG Mang.Co. Fridley Bus Serv. Inc. Country Club Inc. Erickson Bros. Jean Robertson Koch Mikt. Co. .� Marlin R. Besler Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J.Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Nealth Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hiii Public Safety Director 15 D Page 5 $45.00 $45.00 � $45.00 $45.00 Exempt Exempt $45.Q0 $50.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 n O� F.OR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - LICE'�SES March 22, 1.982 Cont'. Tom Thumb #141 315 Osborne Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Western Stores 7600 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 On Sale Beer Godfathers Pi zza Of ��In. 7910 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Private Gas Pump Anderson Trucking Serv. 7600 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 City of Fridley 400 - 71st Ave.N.E. Fridley, P1n. 55432 Determan 4Je1 di ng 1241 - 72nd Ave.PJ.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 D.41. Harstad Co. Inc. 7101 Highway �65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Lampert Building Center 7600 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 Land 0'Lakes Inc. I�nterstate 694 & ��ain St. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Park Construction 7900 Beech St. N.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 Unity P1ed. Center 550 Osborne Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Refuse Hauler Tom Thumb Food Mkt. Continintal Oil Co. James Gallup Same Ralph Volkman James Determan Same Same Same Same Same James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Pub7 ic Safety .Di rector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson. Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector Ace Solid Waste Dean 0. Warden Steven J. Olson 3118 - 162nd Lane N.W. " Health Inspector Anoka, Mn. 55303 � 15 E Page 6 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $30.00 Exempt $30.00 $30.00 �30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $75.00 � � F.OR CONCURRENCE 9Y THE ClTY COUNClL - LICE'JSES ,,,_ March 22. 1982 : Cont'. Bautch Disposal 10264 Xylite St. N.E. Mpls. Mn. 55434 Hilger Trsf. 8550 Zachary Lane Fridley, Mn.55432 MCS Refuse, Inc. 10050 Naples St.N.E. Blaine, Mn. 55434 Walters Disposal 2930 - 101st Ave.N.E. Blanie, Mn. 55434 Watse Control 95 W. Ivy St.Paul, Mn. 55117 Woodlake Sanitary Serv. 8661 Rendova St. New Brighton, Mn. 55112 Retail Gasoline Sales Big 4Jhee1 Auto Store 745]. E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Les's Standard 7680 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, P1n. 55432 Sinclair Mkt. Inc. 6290 Highway #65 Pl.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Raymond Bautch David A. Klatke,Jr. Dennis P1cGraw George Walter Ronald Roth Ben H. Shutrop Apsco Prod. Go. L.Schaffran R.H. Johnson Sinclair P�1kt. Inc. R.H. Johnson 6071 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holiday Station Store 5807 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Q Petroleum Corp. 5300 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, htn. 55432 Same �•larl i n R. Besl er Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Darrel Clark Building Inspector Darrel Clark Bui7ding Inspector Darrel Clark Building Inspector Darrel Clark Building Inspector Darrel Clark Building Inspector Darrel Clark Building Inspector Q Petroleum Corp. �1arlin R. Bes�,er Darrel Clark 6101 University Ave.fV.E . Building Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 15 F Page 7 $60.00 $60.OQ $135.00 �60.00 $60.00 $90.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 � $60.00 $60.00 $60.OQ $60.00 0° � F.OR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - LIC��SES March 22, 1982 Cont'. Riverside Car 41ash Randall Olchefske 6520 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 4lestern Stores Western Stores Div. 7600 Uni�✓ersity Ave. PJ.E. - Fridley, �1n. 55432 Solictior The Flower Shoppe 8484 Central Ave.N.E. Spring Lrk.Pk., Mn.55432 Calvary Commissions, Inc. Box 100 Lindale, Tx. llsed_Motor Vehicles Motor Valet Used Cars 5649 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Vending Machines Aamco Transmissions 940 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 554332 Anderson Trucking 7600 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Anderson Trucking 7600 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Anoka Comm. Action 7150 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Automatic Eng. 7191 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 Barry Blower Div. 99 = 77th 4Jay N.E. Frtdley, Mn. 55432 Burlington Northern 80 - 44th Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 P1ary Lou Box Da1 e E. �Aeredi th John Pomaville Coca Co 1 a Patrick J. 0'Donnell Sunrise Vending Coca Cola Same Servomation Corp. Coca Cola ., Darrel Clark Building Inspector Darrel Clark Building Inspector James P. Hiil Public Safety� Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hi71 Public Safety Director Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Nealth Inspector Steven J.01son Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector 15 G Page 8 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 Exempt $150.00 $25.00 $25.00 $50.00 � $25.00 $25.00 $250.00 $25.00 n D� F.OR CONCURRENCE 9Y THE ClTY COUNCIL — LICE'�SES March 22, 1932 � Cont'. Burlington Northern Coca Cola 4057 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn.55432 Carefree Images Coca Cola 244 Mis�issippi St. N.E. � Fridley, Mn. 55432 Central Dental Lab. Inc. Robert Jaeger 56Q1 - �th St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 City of Fridley 400 - 71st AVe.iV.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 C & M Cycle 8290 Main St. Pd.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Ralph Volkman Coca Cola Commerce Park Office Bldg. Coca Cola 7362 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Country Club 6257 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, P�n. 55432 Determan Welding 1241 - 72nd Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 �orm Products Co. 7521 Commerce Lane N.E. Fridley, h1n. 55432 Fridley Assembly of God �72 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridiey Comm. Cntr. 6085 - 7th St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Jr. High School 610Q 41. Ploore Lk. Dr. Fridley, h1n. 55432 Fridley Medical 7675 P1adison St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Sr. High 6000 4J. Moore Lk. Dr. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Country Club Mkt.Inc. James Determan Sunrise Vending Coca Cola Coca Cola Coca Cola Coca Cola ., Coca ��Col a Steven J. Qlson Health Inspector Steven J.Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J.Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Qlson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J.Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector 15 N Page 9 $50.00 $25.00 $25.00 Exempt $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $50.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 0° � F.4R CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNClL - LICE��SES March 22, 1.982 , . Cont.' Fridley Sr. High Coca Cola 6000 W. Moore Lk. Fridley, Mn. 55432 N.B. Fuller Electro Cote P& R Vending Serv. 5220 Main St. Fridley ! Mn. 55432 H.B. �uller Electro Cote 5220 P1ai n St. Fridl.ey, Mn. 55432 Fullerton Pletals 5170 htain St. N.E. Fridley, Mn: 55432 Georgetown Courts 5750 E. River Rd. Fridley, P•tn. 55432 Holiday Station Store 5807 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holiday Warehouse No. 25Q - 57th Ave.N.E. Fridley, P1n. 55432 Holly St.Hair Styl. 6574 University Ave.N.E. Fri dl ey, P1n . 55432 House of Large Size 6532 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Industrail Spray Paint. 8251 Ashton Ave. Fridley, h1n. 55432 Larson �1fg. 7421. Commerce Ln. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Les's Siandard - 7680 Highway # fi5 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Lynwood Manor II 5700 E. River Rd. Fridley, P4n. 55432 Coca Cola Coca Cola Mr. Filiister Same Erickson Bros. John Davis Inc. Coca Cola A.Toews Cbca Cola L. Schaffran Coca Cola Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J.Olson Nealth Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J.Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Ntedtronics; Inc. Servomation Corp. Steven J: Olson 6970 Central Ave. P�.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 15 I Page 1Q $100.00 $25.00 � $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $75.00 $100.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $50.00 $25.00 $445.00 0° � � F.OR CONCURRENCE SY TNE CITY COUNCtL - LI(�'�SES March 22, i982 Cont.' Minco 7300 Commerce Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Dr. Mudspringer 6227 Higi�way #65 N.E. Fridley, P9n.55432 No. 1 Health Club 6530 E. River Rd. Fridley, P1n. 55432 Interstate United Sharon 8rown Coca Cola Onan Corp. Servomation Corp. 1400 - 73rd Ave�.N.E. Fridley, P1n. 55432 Perkins Cake & Stk. Coca Cola 7520 University Ave.N.E. • Fridley, Mn. 55432 Precision Sheet Meta1 Coca Col� 5250 Main St. N.E. Fridley, P1n. 55432 Rice Freek Elem. School Coca Cola 6666 Arthur St. N.E. Fridley, h9n. 554322 Riverside Car & Truck Wash Randall Olchefske 6520 E. River Rd. Fridley, P1n. 55432 Riverside Car & Truck Wash Coca Cola 6520 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sears Roebuck & Co. Coca Cola �199 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Servomation Corp. Same 7490 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Shars Snack Bar .' Coca Cola 5207 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Skywood Clns. Coca Cola 5251 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 ., Strite Anderson h1fg. Servomation Corp. 7585 Viron Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn.55432 Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Insp.ector Steven J. Olson Health Inspecior Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector 15 J Page 11 . $325.00 $25.00 $25.00 _ $1240.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 �25.00 $25.00 $100.00 $25.00 $25.00 $250.QD 0 � F.OR CONCURRENCE 8Y THE ClTY COUNCIL — LICE�rSES March 22, 1982 Cont'. S & S Tool Inc. 7713 N.E. Beech St. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Stevenson Elem. 6080 E . �Ri ver Rd . Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sunliner Motel 6881 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sunshine Club 6431 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Target Headquarters 1080 - 73rd Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Totino's Foods 7350 Commerce Ln. N.E. Frid�ey, Mn. 55432 Trans Continental Tire 7968 Main St. N.E. Fridley, PAn. 55432 Viking Eng. & Dev. Inc. 7740 Beech St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Woodcrest School 880 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, h1n. 55432 a Coca Cola Coca Cola Coca Cola Carol 4Ji 11 i ams Servomation Corp. ARA Food Serv. Coca Cola Same Coca Cola Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Hea�th Inspector 15 K Page 12 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 Exempt $400.00 $340.00 $25.00 $50.00 $25.00 0�'' � F,OR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - LIC�i1sEs MAiiCIi 22, 1982 GENERAL COPJTRACTOR APPROVED BY B & K Builders � 1500 - 14th Avenue N.W. New Brighton, NQ1 551I2 DuAll Service Cbntractors 3851 Central Avenue N.E. Columbia Heights, MN 55421 Harrison Development, Inc. 7920 Cedar Avenue South BZoomington, MN 55420 Marjamaa Q�ns truction Inc. Route #1, Box 62A Big Lake, MN 55309 HEATING Mo.dern Iieating & Air �nd. 2318-1st Street N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55418 By: Don Karpinski By; Gary Dooner By: William Harrison By : 47ade Mar j amaa By: Richard Perusse L1P,RRII, CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLATtK ' Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. L�ARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. WILLI.AM SAt1DIN Plbg.-Htig..Insp. 15 L FQR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - ESTIP��TES Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon & Haskvitz 1250 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, MN 55402 For legal services rendered as City Prosecutor for the month of February, 1952 E.A. Hickok and Associates, Inc. 545 Inc;ian Ttound Wayzata, P9N 55391 Professional services - February 19�2 P1oore Lake Restoration Praject --�.. $3,675.00 �3,954.69 0 16 16 �1 STATEMENT SMITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON & HASKViTZ ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1250 BUiLDERS EXCHA►VGE BLDG. MINNEAPOLIS. IviiNNESOTA 55402 33 9-1481 SUBURBAN OFFICE FRIDLEY �City of Fridley � 6431 University Avenue NE Frid!ey, MN 55432 Attention: Mr. Nasim Qureshi, L City Manager � (^�� PLl�I�SQ RETURN TNti �ORTION �ITN YOUR r/�YMENT V DATE � � BALANCE FORWARDED FROM IAST STATEMENT 3-15-82 For iegal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley during February, 1982. Representation of City of Fridiey in court on 2-Q4-82 (Columbia Heights), 2-Q8-82 (Anoka), 2-09-82 (Fridley), 2-10-82 (Fridley), 2-11-82 (Fridley and Columbia Heights), 2-18-82 (Columbia Heights), and 2-25-82 (Columbia Heights) for 65 contested court trials and 19 jury trials. (43 hours). Preparation of 40 criminal complaint. (13 hours - 30 minutes). Five Citiien office conferences. (2 hours - 30 minutes). Citizen phone conferences. (3 hours). Research and writing brief. (8 hours). Staff conference (2-25-82). (30 minutes). Total time (70 hours - 30 minutes). SMITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON & HASKV ITZ .ATTONNEVi I�T LArI STATEMENT SMITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON & HASKVITZ ATTORNEVS AT LAW 1250 BUILDERS EXCHANGE BLDG. MINNEAPOLIS, IYINNESOTA 55402 339-1481 �City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MPJ 55432 Attention: Mr. Nasim Qureshi, L City Manager /LEAfi AETURN TNIS �ORTION MITN rOYM rAYMENT car� oarE . page 2 � � FORWARDED FROM LAST STATEMEMT 3-15-82 February, 1982 Retainer $1,650.00 Time in excess of retainer 2,025.00 (40 hours - 30 minutes) SMITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON & HASKVITZ ATiORNEI�i AT LA� SUBURBAN OFFICE FRIDLEV � J � BALANCE $1,650.00 $3,675.00 0 • ;