The URL can be used to link to this page

09/27/1982 - 5278FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETZNG PLEASE SIGN NAME ADORESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: Sept�mber 27, 1982 NAME ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER ___________________________�-------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- �� -------r ---- � ------� --- ---�� -�� - � , �--f�� s�/�s �/ � . - � � �s� `� /� -- �� ` �v c./� , �. 1�c�k �S �� ` C1 �� u1' � / � n � v �' `4 ,'��,,c"'r a ' ' `" `-� .� `�T h1 �'ri' -�. O��" , '' �i� � �� ',�°"� ��''�j t -�P:�=-� �J /� /�� :/ e �¢//%/� il/ � � �� r. � � y� .c �' �� ? ,.�_ f � ��.� . . . -°�'-��✓� � � - � � � � �' - �,:' � � � � !:., ,-,,. _t: -� . ,, � _k�% - .-; .r' � .n ; . i � � 1 - �� .Z �,J v�.�,.�,.,,T- .,�1--� - , , , v ..5- � J.��_ � 1. � :;,�:> . , ?` ,�� ' �� .d.,�;..� _.�`.'�✓ �, r, � A � �; f �/"� `�; �`�1 .� �� ` '' f � _ / �_` -i� c �' ' !,r� l�` ��j 1� � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 27, 1982 - 7:30 P,M, MEr10 T0: DEPARTMENT NEADS FOLLOWIN6 ARE THE "ACTIONS NEEDED��. PLEASE HAVE YOUR ANSWERS BACK IN THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE BY THE WEDNESDAY BEFORE THE � NEXT REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. THANK YOU. �,�� q�� . PROCtAMATION: . "FRIDLEY NIGHT AT THE OLD LOG" - OCTOBER 3, 1982 Proclaimed by Mayor ACTION TAKEN: Proclamation forwarded to Columbia Heights Jaycee Chairman APPROVAL OF MINUTES: �OUNCIL MEETING, $EPTEMBER 13, 1982 Approved with correction to Motion on Page 10 regarding allocation of money to Anoka County Communications Workshop. Councilman Fitzpatrick voted nay to the motion, and it was adopted on a vote of four to one. CITY MANAGER ACTION NEEDED: Correct minutes to reflect accurate vote on motion. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Adopted as submitted OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: �CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA — 15 MINUTES) No Response � S ; CITY MANAGER� CENTRAL SERVI CENTRAL S � PU3LIC HEARINGS; PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT FOR WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS - 1982. Hearing opened at 7:47 P.M. Closed at 7:48 P.M. . CES Resolution N0. 87-1982 adopted confirming assessment SEE ITEM N0. 16 OLD BUSINESS: � CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RECODIFYING CHAPTER 125 oF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED "SAUNAS AND P�ASSAGE PARLORS�� BY ADDIt]G;� REPEALING OR CHANGING CERTAIN SECTIONS� .�� Ordinance No. 757 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Publish Ordinance in Fridley Sun NEW BUSINESS; PAG 1-1A 2-ZE RECEIVING THE STATEMENT OF CANVASS FOR THE $EPTEMBER 1�, I9HZ PRIMARY ELECTION� � � � � � � � � � � 3 — 3 ,J Statement of Canvass received and certified �CES ACTION NEEDED: File for future reference CONSIDERATI�N OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1983� ��.�� 4 Approved on first reading ACTION NEEDED: Put on next agenda for consideration of?second reading PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS NEW BUSINESS (CoNTiNUED) CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SALE OF REAL ESTATE OWNED BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR OFFICE BUILDING AND CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SALE OF REAL ESTATE OWNED BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR PARKING LoT,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 5-5L Both ordinance adopted on first reading ACTION NEEDED: Put on next agenda for consideration of second readings RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF $EPTEMBER 15, 1982 � � � . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � A. Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #82-05, by Cub Foods to Rezoning from M-2 to C-2S, Tract B, R.L.S. #78, 450 73rd Ave. N.E .............. ........... 6- 6H Planning Commission Recommendation: Denial� �& 6K - 6L Council Action Needed; Set public hearing for October 25, 1982 Public Hearing set for October 25, 1982 ACTION NEEDED: Make arrangements for public hearing B. Consideration of a Lot Split, L.S. #82-06, Kunz Oil Co., 7355 and 7365 East River Road .............. 6I P.C. Recommendation: Approval with stipulations & 6M - 60 Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation E-6 Tabled to a later date ACTION NEEDEQ: Inform applicant that item was tabled for further informati , NEW BUSINESS (CoNTiNUEn) � IiPLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CONTINUED) C. Item from Appeals Commission Meeting of August 24, 1982: Consideration of a Variance to reduce the required lot size to allow the construction of an office building, � David Kramber, 1299 Mississippi St. N.E . ...................:. 6P - 6T . Appeals Comm. Recommendation: Approval with stipulations Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation A Variance is not needed. Council approved a lot split to split " Lot 4 and add �2 to Lot 5 and also provide a 15' bikewayjwalkway easement - PUBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council approval of lot split and easement stipulation D. Item from Appeals Commission Meeting of Sept. 15, 1982: Consideration of Variances to allow the construction of a 4-plex, Chris Zelevarov, 6471 Riverview Terrace N.E......... 6U - 6AA Appeals Comm. Recommendation: Approval with stipulations Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation Approved with stipulations � PUBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant of Council approval with stipulations G'ONSIDERATION OF A PETITION BY SUPERP,MERICA ON $PECIAL �SE PERMIT SP #�%-IZ REQUEST, 566� UNIVER- SITY AVENUE N.E, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 7 - 7 F Approved special use permit with stipulations and contingencies BLIC WORK ACTION NEEDED: Inform applicant o�F Council approval and work with them on agreement and stipulations RECEIVING LETTER FROM GEORGE M� HANSEN COMPANY, P�A� AND APPOINTING AUDITOR FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1982, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 8 - 8 A Letter received and Company appointed as auditors for 1982 audit CENTRAL SER . ACTION NEEDED: Execute letter and forward to George M.?Hansen Company , IC CENTRAL SER $EPTEMBER 2�, 1982 NEW BUSINESS (CoNTiNUEn) PAGE S RECEIVING PETITION N0� �-1982 FOR $TOP $IGN AT 4�TH AND Z'� STREET � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � � � • • 9 - A D Petition received and forwarded to Energy Commission - ' ACTION NEEDED: Work with Police Department to obtain information on problems at this intersection and forward to Energy Commission CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $EOO,OOO GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPMENT BONDS OF 1982, $ERIES II iHRA - CENTER �ITY �FFICE PROJECT)� �� 1� - 10 I Resolution No. 81-1982 adopted with date of consideration of bonds by the City Council changed from October 25, 1982 to November 8, 1982 ACTION NEEDED: Proceed with advertising the bonds for sale CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FOR WAIVER OF FEES FoR HRA ACTIVITIES, ,� . , , , , , , , , , � � . � � . � 11 - 11 A RESOLUTION N0. 82-1981 adopted PUBLIC WORK ACTION NEEDED: Inform HRA of Council waiver of fees PUBLIC WOR CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONSTITU- TIONAL AMENDMENT #Z AN AMENDMENT TO THE MINNESOTA CONSTITUTION ON HIG4iWAY $ONDING, TO REMOVE RESTRICTIONS ON THE INTEREST RATES FOR THE AMOUNT OF TRUCK HIGHWAY BONDS. . . . . � . � . � . � � � �_ � RESOLUTION No. 83-1981 adopted � ACTION NEEDED: Forward resolution to appropriate parties � 12-12D 1982 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED) CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FRIDLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � � RESOLUTION N0. 84-�982 adopted - PUBLIC WORKS ACTION NEEDED: Proceed as authorized - PUBLIC WORKS BLIC WORKS I CENTRAL SER CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE GRANT APPLICATION OF CENTRAL CENTER FOR FAMILY RESOURCES. . � . � . . � � . . ► � � . . . . � . RESOLUTION N0. 85-1982 adopted ACTION NEEDED: Forward resolution of support to CCFR CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: CITY OF FRIDLEY ROOF CONSTRUCTION FOR FILTRATION PLANTS PROJECT #13g� RESOLUTION N0. 86-1982 adbpted ACTION NEEDED: Proceed with advertising for bids PAGE 6 13 -13 F . , � �1�-lyA � � � �15 - 1� C CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR IggZ WATER AND SEWER MAINS� LATERALS AND SERV I CE CON NECT I ONS . . � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � RES(3LUTION N0. 87-1982 adopted . ACTiON NEEDED: Procced as authorized , � �16 - lE A NEW BUSINESS (CoNriNUEn) , �ICENSES � � . . � . � � . . � � � � � � � � � � � � � . 17 — 1% � Approved CENTRAL SERV ACTION NEEDED: Issue licenses �LA I MS � � � � � � � � � � . � � � � � � � � . � � � � � Ig Approved CENTRAL SERV ACTION NEEDED: Pay claims ESTIMATES � � � , � � � � � � � � � , . � � � � � � � • � 19 - 19 B Approved CENTRAL SERV ACTION NEEDEO: Pay estimates � ADJOURN�: 9:�� p.M. ,- �° FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 27, 1982 - 7:30 P,M, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE; PROCLAMATION: � . "FRIDLEY NIGHT AT THE OLD LOG" - OCTOBER 3, 1982 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: �OUNCIL MEETING, $EPTEMBER 13, 1982 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: �CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA - 15 MINUTES) �� Pas PU�LIC HFARINGS;. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ASSESSMENT FOR WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS - I9HZ� �. 1- 1 A OLD BUSINESS: CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RECODIFYING CHAPTER IZ5 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED "SAUNAS AND P�ASSAGE PARLORS�� BY ADDIPlG;� REPEALING OR CHANGING CERTAIN SECTIONS� ��,. 2_ 2� NEW BUSINESS; RECEIVING THE STATEMENT OF CANVASS FOR THE $EPTEMBER 1�}, I9g2 PRIMARY ELECTION� � � � � � � � � � � 3 - 3 � CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING TFiE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1983� .�,.., 4 ,� � NEW BUSINESS (CoNTiNUED) CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SALE OF REAL ESTATE OWNED BY THE CITY OF FRID�EY TO HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR OFFICE BUILDING A ND CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE SALE OF REAL ESTATE OWNED BY THE - CITY OF FRIDLEY TO HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR PARKING LoT,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 5-5L RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 � � � . � � � � � � . � � � � � . � � . � _ 6 A. Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #82-05, by Cub Foods to Rezoning from M-2 to C-2S, Tract B, R.�.S. #78, 450 73rd Ave. N.E......... 6- 6H ................. & 6K - 6L Plannin Commission Recommendation: Denial Council Action Needed: Set public hearing for October 25, 1982 B. Consideration of a Lot Split, L.S. #82-06, Kunz Oil Co., 7355 and 7365 East River Road .............. 61 P.C. Recommendation: Approval with stipulations & 6M - 60 Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation � ,� NEW BUSINESS (CoNTINUEn) iPLANNING COMMISSION P�INUTES CONTINUED) C. Item from Appeals Commission Meeting of August 24, 1982: Consideration of a Variance to reduce the required lot size to allow the construction of an office building, - David Kramber, 1299 Mississippi St. N.E.. � 6P - 6T A�peals Comm. Recommendation: Approval with�� stapulations Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation D. Item from Appeals Corrrnission Meeting of Sept. 15, 1982: Consideration of Variances to allow the construction of a 4-plex, Chris Zelevarov, 6471 Riverview Terrace N.E......... 6U - 6AA Appeals Comm. Recommendation: Approva7 with stipulations Council Action Needed: Consideration of recommendation G'ONSIDERATION OF A PETITION BY SUPERAMERICA ON $PECIAL �SE PERMIT SP #77-1� REQUEST, 566� UNIVER- SITY AVENUE N,E, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 7 - 7 F RECEIVING LETTER FROM GEORGE M, HANSEI3 COMPANY, P.A� ANII APPOINTING AUDITOR FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1982 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 A l 6 $EPTEMBER 2%. 198i NEW BUSINESS (CoNTiNUEn) ^--- � rHbt 7 RECEIVING PETITION N0, 7-1982 FOR $TOP $IGN AT 4STH AND Z'� STREET � � � � � � . . � � � � � � � . � � � 9 - q D CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF �600,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPMENT BONDS OF 1982, SERIES II (HRA - CENTER CITY OFFICE PROJECT)� � , . , , 1p - 10 I CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION FOR WAIVER OF FEES FoR HRA ACTIVITIES, ,� . , . , , , , , , �, , , . , . . � 11 - 11 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONSTITU- TIONAL AMENDMENT #Z AN AMENDMENT TO THE MINNESOTA CONSTITUTION ON HIGHWAY BONDING, TO REMOVE RESTRICTIONS ON THE INTEREST RATES FOR THE AMOUNT OF TRUCK HIGHWAY BONDS. � , , , , � , , , � �� - � � ,�� ti � - v. ,. ... .. � �. �ti� ; 12-12D • FRIDLEY NIGHT AT THE OLD LOG OCTOBER 3, 1882 William J. Nee Maror Fridley, MN. WHEREAS, the Southern Anoke County Assistence (SACA) provides emergency service to the needy of Fridley; end NMEREAS, the food shelves et SACA ere low end need �eplenishing before the Thenksgiving end Christmas seasons; end WHEREAS, the Aree Jeycees end Jeycee Women e�e sponsoring a"Nite at the Old Log" to reise funds for the food shelves et SACA; end MMEREAS� this benefit performance will be hetd October 3; 1982; NOW� 1N EREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that October 3, 1982, should be declered es FRIOLEY NITE AT ?HE OLO LOG end the community residents ere urged to ettend this performence because of the need, but elso because of the easy end still enterteining a�d fun approech it provides to providing for the needy of our community. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and ceused the seal of the City of Fridley to be affixed this 27th dey of September, 1982. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1982 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council Mes celled to o�de� et 7:35 p. a. by Mayor Nee. P�DGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Meyor Nee led the Council snd audience in the Pledge of Allegience to the F le8 . ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Meyor Nee� Counci lmen Fitzpetrick� Counci tmen Hemernik, Councilmen Schneider and Councilmen BernetLe MEMBERS ABSENT: None �PPROVAL OF MINUTES: MEETING OF AUGUST 16. 1982: MOTION by Councilmen Bernette to epprove the minutes es presented. Seconded by Councilman Hemernik. Upon e voice vote. ell voting eye, Mayo r Nee declered the motion cerried unenimouely. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilmen Fitzpatrick to edopt the egende es presented. Seconded by Councitmen Schneider. Upon e voice vote, ell voting eye� Mayor Nee declered the motion carried unenimously. The following items �ere not egenda items� but edded leter in the meeting: (1) Consideretion of a Resolution Approving e Permit Application to the Metropoliten Weste Control Commission by Kuether Distributing Compeny. [2) Consideration of e Resolution Ordering Improvement and Approvel of Plens And Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Moore Leke Storm Sewer Project No. 1�37. (3) Receiving Petition #6-1982 in opposition to Heavy truck treffic on 5th Street from 61st Avenue to 63rd Avenue. OPEN FORLlM. VISITORS There was no response from the eudience under this item of business. Q�16LIC HEARINGS• 1 PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PROJECT FOR ISSUANCE OF S2 000 000 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS TO THE KUETHER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENF ACT MINNESOTA STATUTES CHAPTER 474• MOTION by Councilman Hemernik to �eive the reading of the public heerin8 COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1982 PAGE 2 notice end open the public heering. Seconded by Councitmen Schneider. Upon e voice vote, alt voting eye, Meyor Nee declared the motion cer�ied unenimously end the public heering opened et 7:38 p. m. Mr. Inman, City Clerk. steted this is e request for epprovel of the issuance oP industriel revenue bonds in the emount of i2,000,000 for construction of a 60�000 square foot beer distributing werehouse. Mr. Inman steted it is proposed thet this fecility, once completed, will employ over 25 persons. Mr. Inmen stated information hes been received from the finencial people end reviewed by the City, end is in complience Mith the stetutes governing the issuance of industrial revenue bonds. Mr. Ron Berg� representing Miller Securities, Inc., stated they ere the underwriter for this transection end explained that Mr. Kuethe� hes been in the distributing business for over 30 years in Minneapolis end would be moving to this new fecility, if epp�ovel is given for the issuence of the industrial revenue bonds. Mr. Berg presented e site plan for this warehouse, which would be located � on Highway 65, just west of Pennzoil. He stated this parcel is presently vacent end it is proposed to extend the existing se�vice drive to the south. Mr. Berg further steted there would be perking p�ovided for epproximately 40 cers end landscaping eround the property. He stated there has been no discussion regerding fencing, but this mey be necessary for security �easons. Mr. Berg stated preliminary plans heve been submitted to the City staff end they would work with them to finalize the detai ls. M�. Berg stated Kuether Dist�ibuting is only e distribution center and no elcoholic beverages will be made on the site. Mr. Young, representing Kuether Distributing, stated they heve 18 routes and there would be two to four semi—trucks per day into this distributing fecility. � Mr. Berg stated their company hes reviewed the finencial statements and has agreed to buy the bonds and market them. Councilman Hamernik esked whet other costs were involved besides the land end the building. Mr. Young stated in their breakdown, the costs, other than for the land end building� were for such things as coolers, a climate cont�ol system, to write the discount on the bonds� and a contingency for construction. No persons in the audience spoke regarding the proposed issuance of these industrial revenue bonds. MOTION by Councilman Schneide� to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Bernette. Upon e voice vote, all voting eye, Mayor Nee declared the Motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 7:47 p. m. COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1982 PAGE 3 Mr. Qureshf, City Manager, steted the resolution giving prelimirtery epproval for this project is on the .Council's egenda for consideretion leter in the meeting, hawever� Nr. Berg hes enother commit�ent end hed to leeve the meeting, therefore, Mr. Qureshi esked if the Council Nished to consider the resolution et this time. 1 b RES�UTION N0. 72-1982 GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT UNDER THE �UNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT REFERRING THE PROPOSAL TO THE I�QMMISSIONER OF ENERGY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL AND �1THORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY OOCUMENTS (KUETHER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY: MQTIQN by Councilman Hemernik to edopt Resolution No. 72-1882, Saconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, ell voting aye, Mayor Nee declered the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Qureshi, City Maneger, stated this site does not heve City sewer evailable, howeve�, Lhere is e line of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission elong the south boundary. He requested, therefore� the Council to conside� e resoLution to petition the Metropotitan Waste Control Commission to permit e direct connection to their line for Kuether's proposed fecility. �� RESOLUTION N0. 73-1982 APPROVING A PERMIT APPLICATION TO THE METROPOLITAN WASTE COMTROL COMMISSIOM TO PERMIT A DIRECT CQNMECTION TO THEIR LINE FOR IHE P80POSED KUETHER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY'S FACILITY: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to edapt Resolution No. 73-1982. Seconded by Councilman 8ernette. Upon e voice vote, ell voting aye, Mayo� Nee declered the mntion carried unanimously. 2 PUBLIC HEARING ON PRQPOSED 1983 CITY BUDGET INCLIIDING AMOUNTS TO 8E BUDGETED FOR REVENUE SHARING PURPOSES: MOTION by Councilmen Fitzpatrick to weive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hea�ing. Seconded by Councilmen Schneider. Upon a vaice vote, a!1 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion cerried unenimously and the public hearing opened at 7:50 p. m. Mr. Qureshi� City Manager, stated the totel General Fund budget prpoposed is �6�307,659, with $280,000 finenced by revenue sharing funds. Mr. t,llureshi stated the revenue shering funds would be spent in the areas of general management, public safety, and parks and recreation. The overall budget for a1! fands is a7,088,459. No persons in the audience spoke regarding the 1983 budget. MOTION by Councitman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, att vnting aye, Mayor Nee declered the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 7:52 p. m. EOUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1982 QLD BUSINESS: PAGE 4 � c� pRDINANCE N0. 754 AOOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 211 ENTITLED "SUBDIVISION" AND v REPEALING OLD CHAPTER 211 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE IN ITS ENTIRETY [1ST READING 7/12/B2): Mr. Qureshi stated thie is to updete the ordinence end bring it in compliance with Stete stetutes. He fu�ther explained this ordinence atso provides for zero lot lines. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpetrick to weive the reading of Ordinence No. 754 end edopt it on the second reading end order publication. 5econded by Councilmen Schneider. Upon a voice vote, ell voting eye, Meyor Nee declered the motion carried unanimously. � ORDINANCE N0. 755 TO AMEND THE CITY COD� BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS. ZOA #82-01, W. G. DOTY AND GARY WELLNER I1ST HEADING 4/5/82]: MOTION by Councilman Hemernik to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 755 end edopt it on the second reading end order publication. Seconded by Councilmen Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting eye, Meyor Nee declared the motion cerried unenimouely. � ORDINANCE N0. 756 VACATING STREET RIGHT—OF—WAY SAV #82-02 BY S& R INVESTMENT [1ST READING B✓16/82]: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to waive the reeding of Ordinance No. 756 and adopt it on the second reeding and order publiaation. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, ell voting aye� Mayor Nee declared tha motion carried unanimously. � CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT AREA AND REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DWELLING AT 625 ELY STREET N. E.. GILBERT MENKVELD ANOKA �,TABLED 8/16/82]: Mayor Nee stated the Council received some information f rom staff on the question of smell lots. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager� steted the infarmetion provided to the Council indicated homes in the area which were buiLt on 50 foot lots. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated it is true houses in the area were built on 5Q foot lots, but in this case the ver4ence is ta reduce the lot area from the required 7,500 square feet to 5,500 square feet end the 7,500 square feet is already a reduced amount from most other lots in the City. COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13, 1982 PAGE 5 MOTION by Councilmen Fitzpetrick to concur Mith the recommendetions of the Appeels Commission and deny this varience request besed on the following reasons: Thet the majority of homes in the i�mediete area are built on lerger lots; thet the house to the eest hes en ettached deck that ie built very close to the lot tine; the plen does not provide for e gerege and there is concern ebout perking and storege in e home Mithout e besement; the house plan is not compatible with other homes in the area and there Mas neighborhood objection to the plen. Seconded by Councilmen Bernette. Mr. Menkveld steted the seme evening his veriance request Nas heard by the Appeals Commission they geve epproval for a variance on e 50 foot lot to Mr. Jones. Councilman Schneider stated a verience wes given by the Appeals Commission a 50 foot lot, however, there was a correction to the minutes to indicate the rationele for denying this variance. Mr. Burch of the City staff read the reasons, which were included in the Appeels Commission minutes, why they had recommended denial of this variance. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, felt if it is going to be the City's policy to deny the variences on 50 foot lots, he thought it should be consistent. Councilma� Fitzpatrick stated the reference has been to 50 foot lots and his point is he is objecting to e 5�500 square foot lot� not to e 50 foot lot. Councilman Fitzpetrick stated it bothers him to have a memo f�om staff seying there are epproximately 20 buildable lots when the City has en ordinance seying the minimum requirement is 7,500 square feet. Mr. Herrick felt the staff's memo was qualified by the stetement thet these were buildable, if the City ellows construction where there is a sub— standard square footage. Councilman Schneider elso pointed out thet of the 20 vacant lots, eight have two adjacent 50 faot lots so they could be combined into 10D or 75 foot lots. A gentleman in the audience pointed out that the whole area was platted for 25 foot [ots, howevert the persons in this block have several 25 foot lots which make their parcel 75 to 100 feet in size. Mr. Dale Dickson, 600 Ely Street, stated he has 110 foot frontege, but didn't feel he coutd sptit his Lots because he wouldn't meet the squere footage requirements. Councilman Schneider asked if the Council upholds the decision of the Appeals Commission if the City Attorney would have difficulty if they get into litigation. �• � � � ! • � COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 19B2 PAGE 6 Mr. Herrick� City Attorney� steted he felt th.e reasons for deniel should be erticulated. Council�en Fitzpatrick steted most of the points were �ede fn the discussion by the Appeals Commission even though they Meren't in the motion. UPON A ROLL CALL VQTE, Co�ncilmaR Fitzpatrick� Councilmen Barnette, Councilmen Schneider, Councilman Hamernik, and Meyor Nee all voted in fevor of the motion, and Mayor Nee declered the motion cerried unanimously. �PPOINTMENT — APPEALS COMMISSION [TABLED 8/13/82): Councilman Fitzpatrick nomineted Doneld Betzold, 5640 East River Roed, #105, for appointment to the Appeals Commission and reviewed Mr. Betzold'B resume and beckground. Councilman Schneider stated he had placed Mr. Ron Barrows' name in nominetion et en earlier meeting to be considered for this appointment. UPON A ROLL CALL VOTE, Councilmen Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider, Meyor Nee, Councilman Bernette and Councilman Hamernik all voted in favo r of Mr. Betzold for eppointment to the Appeals Commission. Meyor Nee decle red the motion carried unenimously. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RECOOIFYING CHAPTER 125 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED "SAUNAS AND MASSAGE PARLORS" BY ADDING. REPEALING OR CHANGING SECTIONS: Mr. Herrick� City Attorney� stated Mr. Newmen from his office end the Public Sefety Director, Mr. Hill, have been working on this ordinance. Mr. Herrick steted some of the changes in the ordinence are patterned efter things thet came out in e Lewsuit the City of St. Louis Perk had recently. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the resding and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon e voice vote� all voting aye, Meyor Nee declared the motion cer�ied unanimously. . RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 18. 1982: REZONING REQUEST. ZOA �82-04. BY G. W. PASCHKE. TO REZONE FROM M-1 TQ C-2. 7941 AND 7981 RANCNER'S RDAO; MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to set the public hearing on this rezoning request for October 4, 1982. Seconded by Counci lman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting eye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � i � � 1 4 � � t� COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1982 PAGE 7 ITEMS FROM PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 3. 1962 SPRINGBROOK FEE POLICY: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpetrick to instruct the administretion to bring back a detailed schedule of fees on the concept proposed. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Councilmen Barnette steted this wes e difficulty the City previously got into regarding recreation fees involving persons living in Fridley� but in enother school district. The Springbrook Neture Foundetion hed pessed a resolution fevoring e fee for non—residents, but opposed to e fee for Fridley residents. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted eye, end Meyor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. REQUEST BY JOHN & DARLENE ZARAWSKI. 6767 7TH STREET TO BUY 3 FEET OF TERRACE PARK PROPERTY: Mr. Mark Burch of the City steff stated this home was rebuilt after the tornado and the property owners Nish to get the property lines streight in order to identify the exact Locetion of their property. Mayor Nee steted the Perks end Recreation Commission and the Plenning Commission heve recommended approval of this sele. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendetions of the Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission to sell three feet of Terrace Perk property for 5814. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpetrick. Upon a voice vote, aLl voting aye, Mayor Nee declered the motion ca�ried unanimously. Mr. Herrick stated Lhis sale would have to comply with the Cherter requirements that e finding was made and this was surplus property. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated staff would check into this further in orde� to comply with the Charter requirement. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of August 18, 1982. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon e voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion cerried unanimously. RECEIVING CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 22. 1982: RECEIVING ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOP 1983 BUDGET RE[�UEST AND RECEIVING RECOJ�[�QATION FROM �'HE CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION REGARDING 1883 BUDGET REQUEST: �QUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1982 Mr. (iureshi, City Manager, stated it would be his of the 5� frenchise fee be elloceted to the Anoke Workshop. Mr. Mark Scott, Cheirmen of the ACCW, workshop would receive. Mr. Qureshi steted his t19,000, however, esttmated �evenue would be ebout the case, the emount would be i20,000. PAGE 8 recommendation thet 2� County Communicetions asked what emount the recommendation was for �50,000 and if thet is Mr. Scott stated their budget request wes for i24,967 so if they �eceived i20,000, the would be ebout �5,000 short Mr. Scott stated during 1982, the Workshop reised over 56�000 to pay for ell expenses, beyond the opereting budget granted by the City, end purchesed two color protable video units for community use, put out a reguler newsletter, purchesed blenk tepe end small p�oduction equipment, end provided class materials. He stated the Workshop is pleased with their eccomplishments end hes received e lot of nationel recognition ove� the last several years. Mr. Scott felt e cut in the operating budget would mean e cut in the forward steps made this past year. He stated� in 1982, e part—time person wes hired to handle ell the office manegement duties previously handled by the Coordinetor. He stated this hes resulted in the Coordinator, Will Loew—Blosser, spending more time in assisting new users in p�oduction, doing technicel work, end working with the schools. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager� felt if 2X of the franchise fees received f rom Northern Ceblevision were committed to the Workshop, this would resolve whet kind of support the city would provide and the Workshop� in turn, would know exactly what percentege they would be receiving. Mr. Scott steted he liked the idea of knowing what percentage they would be receiving, however� et this point, the 2X would mean e cut in their services. He stated the Workshop in the pest hesn't had everything hended to them, but felt the next year will be en important one because of the things ste�ted in the last six months. Mr. Dureshi, City Maneger, stated it becomes difficult to try and cut back in other ereas and then to see such a drestic increase in this eres. Mayor Nee stated this is the only function in the whole operation in Fridley that added personnel. Mr. Scott stated he felt this was e different situation here where they a�e working with special funds to be used for public access� end it is not coming from the Generel Fund. Councilman Hamernik felt the amount the Workshop receives should be based on 2% of the fees received by Northern Cablevision. COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 19B2 PAGE 9 Councilmen Fitzpatrick stated he understands whet the City Maneger is seying, however, he felt en ettempt should be mede to come es close es possible to the Workshop's request, as this is a unique situetion end Lhe Workshop is well—recognized end doing e good job. Mr. Scott steted he understends the City's dilemme, but felt this res e speciel situetion where they heve to use the money for eccess purposes. Mr. Peul Kaspszek, 1317 Hillcrest Drive, steted before they hired a person pert—time, the Coordinetor was spending 40 to 50� of his time handling phones and filling out forms, and not getting out to meet the people end essisting people in production end technicel work. He stated by the Workshop receiving the extre money, they Mould� in fact, help the City because the Coordinetor will heve more time to expend and develop the City channel. Mayor Nee steted the �eal problem is the expansion of this ectivity when everyone else is being asked to cut beck. Councilmen Fitzpetrick stated it is true they have esked other depertments not to expend their needs or services� but, et the seme time, the Council hes expressed frustration that the educetional television was nat developing. He felt if they went the eccess expended� it is kind of a criticel year and that the Workshop has demonstreted their need for the budget for this year. Councilman Barnette stated he was one that initiated witholding funds to orgenizetions they have funded previously. He felt if he epproved this increase, it would be inconsistent with actions taken concerning other groups and orgenizetions in the City. Mr. Timm Lovaas, 6631 Jackson Street, steted he felt the public access chennel wes a reflection of the entire community. He stated the Wo rkshop is going to great lengths to train people in order fo r them to get their views across on the public eccess channel. He felt the 5� funds from the franchise fee should be equally split between the ACCW and the City. Mr. Lovaas stated� if this wes done, it would meet their budget request. M�. Paul Kaspszak stated he would like to know whe�e the other 3X of the frenchise fee is being used. He stated if the Cable Commission needs it or if the City is going to buy equipment, then he would have a better idea of what is happening. He felt there should be an increase from the 2X recommended to 2-1/2X of the frenchise fee. He felt if the other 1/2X could be used better elsewhere that wauld be fine, but felt the Workshop's eccomplishments speak for themselves. Councilman Schneider stated he is not questioning the work of the ACCW, but the problem he has is justifying a staff increase for them when they cannot justify a staff increase for anyone else. COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1982 PAGE 10 M�TION by Councilman Schneide� to alocate 520,000 to the Anoke County Communicetions Warkshop f�om the 5% frenchise fee from the Cable Compeny, with the understanding thet is to be adjueted, whenever precticel, to represent 2X of the actuel revenues the City receives f�om the Cable Company. Seconded by Councilman Hemernik. Upon e voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declered the motion carried unenimouely. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Cable Television Commission Meeeting of July 22� 1982. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon e voice vote, ell voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion cerried unanimously. 1 1 RECEIVING CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 19. 1892: MOTION by Counci lman Barnette to receive the minutes of the Ceble Television Commission Meeting of August 19, 1982. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, ell voting aye, Mayor Nee declered the motion carried unanimously. ' �, 2, CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO EXTEND A VARIANCE AND LOT SPLIT FOR ONE YEAR BY ROBERT ERICKSON. B. E. CONSTRUCTION. TO REDUCE THE LOT AREAS AND LOT WIDTHS AT 1239 AND 1241 NORTON AVENUE: 13 � � MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grent e one yeer extension on the varisnce and lot split as requested by Mr. Erickson in his letter of August 26, 1982. Seconded by Councilmen Fitzpetrick. Upon e voice vote, all voting aye, Meyor Nee declered the motion cerried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 68-1982 DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES THROUGH NEGOTIATIONS [IWEN TERRACE SUBDIVISION — MOORE LAKE [BASFU]: Mr. Mark Burch of the City steff steted a price has been negotiated to acquire fou� lots in the Iwen Terrace Subdivision in order to construct the BASFU for Part II of the Moore Leke Restoration Project . Mr. Burch stated the consultant feels there ere sufficient funds in Phase I of the project to pay for the ecquisition of this property. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to edopt Resotution No. 6 B-1982. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Councilman Hamernik questioned the funding for this acquisition. Mr. Qureshi� City Manager, steted it is part of Phase I construction� some monies are committed in the General Fund, and a pending storm sewer essessment in one aree thet would raise monies to pey this cost. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted sye, and Mayor Nee declered the motion carried unanimously. RESOLUTION N0. 69-1982 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF SUBSTATE AGREEMENT AND STATE GRANT AGREEMENT [MOORE LAKE PHASE II): Mr. (�ureshi, City Manager, stated this resolution is for Phase II of the COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUS7 13. 1982 PAGE 11 Moore Leke Restoration Project end Nould provide a blanket on the east b�sin of Moore Lake. Mr. Qu�eshi steted the only funding the City will receive is 50X from the Federel government end pointed out there Mould not be e 25% match from the State. Mr. Qureshi stated if the City chooses to proceed with Phese II, the City commitment would be 50% of the cost or a278,297. He steted funding for the pr�oject could be obtained by using the tex increment district or the entire dreinage district could be assessed for e totel emount or some combinetion of the two. Councilman Hemernik stated he has e problem with the emount of funds needed which is a third of e million dollers. Councilman Schneider stated if there is e development in the future� then the tex increment could support e maJor portion of this cost. He felt the key point, even though it is e tot of money, the City is receiv�ng 50� of the cost and didn't know if this opportunity would ever come around again. He felt if it really improves the lake and there is some development along Moore Lake, it is a good investment. - Councilman Bar�ette felt the Council made a commitment and it is a gamble, but they should invest the money to restore Moore Lake. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he shared Councilman Barnette's feeling in that they have begun the project and committed themselves to it. Councilman Hemernik felt the Council had committed themselves to varioue pheses and ell phases would yield different results, but he didn't feel they were committed to anything past e ce�tain phese. Mayor Nee feLt if they stopped at the end of Phase I, there would be some benefit, but an investment in thst erea could be the emenity for development end important for everyone in the City. Councilman Hamernik stated he had his doubts if it was really cost— effective, and this is en extremely large sum of money� and questioned if it will really be beneficiel. He also felt if they are contributing funds to Moore Lake. there are other bodies of water that need ettention. He stated he has e problem with giving attention to one and not another, end if there was an overall plan, he may be more egreeable to it. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adnpt Resolution No. 69-1982. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a roll call vote, Councilman Schneider, Concilman Bernette, Councilman Fitzpatrick, and Mayor Nee voted in fevor of the motion. Concilman Hamernik voted against �he motion. Meyor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote. It was the concensus af the Council that the City's portion for the cost of this project should come from the tax increment district. �OUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1982 PAGE 12 �SOLUTION �VO. 70-1982 ORDERING IMPROVEMENI,ANO APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING AOVERTISING FOR BIDS: MOORE LAKE STORM SEWER PROJECT N0. 137: MOTION by Councitmen Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 70-1982. Seconded by Councimlen Bernette. Upon e voice vote� ell voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unenimously. 1� RESOLUTION NO 71-1982 AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO APPLY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS PARK: Mr. Qureshi� City Manager, steted this �esolution is to obtein State perticipation in acquisition of property for development of a pa rk in the Riverview Heights erea. He steted there is en indicetion that funding would be eveilable to cover 50% of the cost� with the City providing the other 50% or 567.772. Mr. O,ureshi stated this project has been considered in the past and there is a possibility that block grant monies could be used to cover the City's share. He stated e determination would have to be made on what prope�ties would be scquired. He further stated the City hes almost 80X of the property in this aree, end the adoption of the resolution would move to ecquiring edditional property. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 71-1982. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpetrick. Upon e voice vote, all voting eye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mrs. Belisle, 7801 Apex Lene, eppeered before the Counci l regarding the ecquisition of property for the proposed park. She questioned when this would be done and if she woutd have to move this winter. Mr. (�ureshi� City Manager, steted the City would contect her to see whet errangements could be wo�ked out regerding her property, however, he assured her she would not have to move this winter. He stated this is e long process and the City would contact her regarding her needs end try to come up with e mutually ecceptable egreement. 1` RESOLU7ION N0. 74-1982 ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH STATE OF MINNESOTA TO IMPROVE THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT HIGHWAY #65 AND OSBORNE ROAD: MOTION by_Councilmsn Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 74-1982. Seconded by Councilmen Hamernik. Upon e voice vote, all voting eye, Mayor Nee declered the motion carried unanimously. 1� RESOLU7ION NO 75-1982 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR 1982 SERVICE CONNECTIONS: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 75-1982. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a vaice vote, all voting eye, Mayor Nea declered the motion cerried unanimously. COUNCIL MEETING OF �UGUST 13. 1982 PAGE 13 1 C� RESOLUTION NO 76-1982 DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1982 SERVICE CONNECTIONS: MOTION by Councitmen Schneider to edopt Resolution No. 76-1982. Seconded by Councilmen Hamernik. Upon e voice vote, alt voting eye� Meyor Nee decLared the motion cerried uhanimously. 2, Q RESOLUTION N0. 77-1982 DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES (1982]: MOTION by Councilman Barnette to edopt Resolution No. 77-1982. Seconded by Counci[man Hemernik. Upon e voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declered the motion carried uneni�ously. � 1 RESOLUTION N0. 78-1982 DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TREATMENT AND REMOVAL OF TREES [1982): MOTIQN by Councilman Fitzpetrick to adopt Resolution No. 78-1982. Seconded by Councilmen Schneider. Upon e voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2 2 RESOLUTION N0. 79-1962 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOTS 10 AND 11 BLOCK 4 LOWEL� ADDITION. ANQ REPLATING INTO CONDOMINIllM N0. 9: MOTION by Councilman Fizpatrick to edopt Resolution No. 79-1982. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon e voice vote, all voting eye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2;� RESOLUTION NO BO-1982 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COMBINING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOTS 1 THROUGH 5 AND LOT 12. BLOCK 2. PACO INDUSTRIAL PARK: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution N0. BO-19B2. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpetrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye� Meyor Nee declared the motion cerried unanimously. 2 � APPOINTMENT — CITY EMPLOYEE: MOTION by Counclman Schneider to concur with the following appointment by the City Manager: NAME Stephen E. Miller Route #2� Box 23 Monticello, MN 55362 POSITION Police Officer Police Dept. SALARY 51365 per month STARTING DATE September 27� Replecement 1982 Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. lJpon a voice vote, ell voting eye, Meyor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1982 2 e� �MS : � 2 "7 PAGE 14 MOTION by Councilmen Schneider to authorize peyment of Claims No. 224F22 through 253504. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon e voice vote, all voting eye, Meyor Nee declered the motion cerried unenimously. IC NS S: MOTION by Councilman Bernette to epprove the ticenses as submitted and ae on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilmen Schneider. Upon e voice vote, all voting eye� Meyor Nee declered the motion carried unanimously. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpetrick to approve the estimetes es submitted. Her�ick & Newman, P.A. . 6279 University Avenue NE Fridley� MN 55432 _ For Legal services rendered es City Attorney for the month of August, 1982 Smith� Juster� Feikeme� Melmon & Hsskvitz 1250 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, MN 55402 For legal services rendered es City Prosecutor for the month of July, 1882 C. S. McCrossen, Inc. P. 0. Box A.D. Osseo, MN 55369 Change Order No. Proj ect 1982-2 1 — Street Improvement Helvo�son Construction Co. 4227 165th Avenue N.E. Wyoming, MN 55092 Partial Estimate #3 1962 Misc. Concrete Curb 6 Gutter Project E. A. Hickok & Associates, Inc. 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, MN 55391 Professional Services — July, 1982 Moore Lake Restoration Project Allied Blecktop Company� Inc. 10503 89th Avenue North Maple Grove, MN 55369 FINAL ESTIMATE No. 1 � 4,319.66 S 4�999.50 $12�496.00 � 3,709.00 S 1,873.38 560�564.66 COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1982 PAGE 15 Seconded by Councilmen Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, ell voting eye� Meyor Nee declared the motion ce�ried unanimously. ��,� RECEIVING PETITION #6-1982 FROM HENRY KOESTER. 6141 5TH STREET IN OPPOSITION TO HEAVY TRUCK TRAFFIC ON 5TH STREET FROM 61ST AVENUE TO 63RD AVENUE: . � Councilman Bernette stated this petition he received conce rned Lhe truck traffic on 5th Street end the pe�sons signing the petition had encoureged the truck treffic to use the service road, rather than 5th Street. Councilmen Barnette steted by the time the petition wes received, the City steff had elready teken action, end Mr. Koester was contected-to Let him know what wes done to correct this situetion. MOTION by Councilman Schneide� to receive petition #6-1982 submitted by Mr. Henry Koester. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon e voice vote, ell voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �DJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilmen Bernette to edjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon e voice vote, elt voting eye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unenimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of September 13, 1982 edjourned at 10:30 p. m. Respectfully submitted, Cerole Hedded Secretary to the City Council Approved: William J. Nee Mayor 1 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Ha11 in said City on the P7th day of September , 1982, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. to hear and pass upon a objections if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: 1982 WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS NOT HERE70FORE FURNISHED AND AVAILABLE The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. ' At said hearing, the Council will consider written or oral objections to the ,, proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction and furnishing af sewer mains, laterals, and service connections, and water mains, laterals, and service connections in and to the properties, as follows: S. 138 Ft. of Lot 1 Lot 3, Block 1 !ot 21, 81ock 1 Auditor's Subdivision No. 10 Alice Addition Alice Wall Addition The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and is the same as those listed above. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein con- tained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the City Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding office r at the hear�ng. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1982, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLE . MAYOR . William J. Nee ATTEST: CI7Y CLERK Sidney C. Inman Publish: Fridley Sun on September 15 and 22, 1982 lA MEMO T0: NASIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER, AND CITY COUNCIL ' FROM: SIDNEY C. INMAN, DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL SERVICES/CITY CLERK SUBJECT: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 1982 SERVICE CONNECTIONS DATE: AUGUST 17, 1982 The lateral charges made under this assessment roll are made under the authority provided in Ordinance No. 113 and under Resolution No. 86-1962. Each of the properties has connected on to City water or sewer or both without having paid a lateral charge. This assessment is figured in two ways, either using today's - average lateral charges, or using charges that were levied in the general area at the time the lines in question were installed, plus accrued interest to the present time. The assessment rate used on the affected properties is the lower of the above two formulas. All property owners involved in this assessment roll have signed agreements agreeing to the principle of these lateral charges. SCI ps � •.�� , . �: :. �!N � AI�DIR; Ai�D RH�YI2iG CBAPTER 125 OF '� FRIIILY CI'lY � H�l't'I'II� 'SADI�S Ai�D !lAS.Si�GE PARIai.S' _ SY �p�, g�,� Qt � CERTAIN SECTIONS ► i w •� M� � .� « . � �� . • • � • � r, ��" 125.01 STA'�rr OF F(LIQt Zlze City Camcil of the City of Fridley �6ri�id�fs� �� it necessary to pravide for the special � express regulation of businesses or commercial enterprises 6f i� i� ��1Id�J�� 6 X�t��►�lt� iri Y,�i/� �4�6iE�t �rh 4perate a� �,�,f,�� names in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare and to guard against the inception and transmission of disease. Tt�. �.�,y ,CoLnc�? - .-:.t -- �.1!l �.. , • �: - �l II'.11�- • �- _.��- • �- •��• .�• -��• • �• �- •� � - � 1 • •- -• / 1• - -• � • � �S�L�a -�o The City Council also finds that control and regulation of commercial establishments of these types, in view of the abuses often perpetrated, require intensive efforts by the Polioe Departznent, Public Aealth Sanitarian and other depart�nents of the City. As a consequence► the oon�entrated use of City servioes in such control c3etracts fran and reduoes the level of serv�ce available to the rest of the oacmwnity and thereby diminishes the ability of the City to promote tiie general health, welfare and safety o€ the community. In oonsideration for the neoessity on the part o� the City to proovide numerous servioes to all sec�nents of the aa�n�ity, without a concentration of publfc servioes in one area working to the cietriment of the members of the general public, the number of sauna and massage parlor licenses wYiich may be in force at any one time shall be two, for oaiunercial businesses. �.7.`�ly 1. 7� J 1.1 M Y_�,��"j 6. 1Kas.sage Parlor. Any premises at or in whic� massage is performed. The practice of massage is hereby declared to be distinct from the practice of inedicine, surgery, osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy, or pediatry and persons duly licensed in this state to practice medicine, surgery, osteopathy, chiropractic, physical therapy, or pediatry,.� nurses who work solely under the direction of such persons, 6f �YSi�ifi� dif��iCaSf� � if�iin/�f� are hereby expressly excluded from the provisions of this chapter. Beauty culturists and barbers who do not give, or hold thens uelves out to give, massage treatments� as 3efined herein, other than is custoR►arily given in such shops or places of business, for the purpose of beautification only sha11 be exempt from the provisions of this section. � �� 2 2A � - . :,y. :�. �- - .�. .,- . u u. _.- � i- . _- . :� - � - • �� . �� • - - � ./1 1 =1� �.t • :,� • • � • . • - � 11 - � =.!l -11.-1 • � • • �� - • • •-• �. �' •- • 11 1• • II- -• - - - �� • . � • � - �' • �11 � • • • � ' - y - . � • i •� rs .. � - v� t• '• • •: .-+: Application for lioense shall be made only on the forms provided by the City IKanager. Four vomplete oopies of the application shall be furnished to the offiae of the City Qerk oontaining the acidress and legal description of the pro�erty to be used, the names, addresses and phone numbers of the awner, lessee, if ariy, and the o�eratac or mar�ager, �e name, address and telephor� rnanber of two persons, who shall be residents of Anoka County and who may be called upon to attest to the applicant's, manager's or operator's character f whether the applicar►t, manager or operatar has ever been oorrvicted of a crime or offense other than a traffic offense and, if so, complete and accurate information as to the time, place and nature of such crime or offense including the disposition thereoff the names and addresses of all creditors of the applicant, awner, lessee, or mar�ager insofar as and regarding creciit whi� has been extenc]e3 for the purposes of oonstructing, equipping, maintaining, operating or furnishing or aoquiring the prenises, personal effects, equignent or anything incic3ent to the establishment, maintenance and operation of a massage parlor or massage establisYunent. If the application is made on behalf of a corporation, joint business venture, partnership or any legally oonstitutec7 business association, it shall submit along with its application, accurate and oomplete business recorcis shawing the names and addresses of all inclividuals having an intersst in the business, including,p�rt�s. Off�cers. awners and creditors furnishing credit for the establishment, acquisition, mai.ntenance and furnishing of �ia twsi�ss �a, in the case of a oorporation, the names and addresses of all officers, general managers, members of the board of directors as well as any creditors who have extended credit for the acquisition, maintenance, operation or furnishing of the establishment including the purchase or aoquisition of any items of personal property for use in said operation. All applicants shall furnish to the City, along with their applications, complete and accurate documentation establishing the interest of the applicant and any other person, having an interest in the premises upon which the building is proposed to be located or the furnishings thereof, personal property thereof, or the operation or maintenance thereof . Documentation shall be in the form of a lease, deed, contract for deed, mortgage deed, mortgage credit arrangement, loan agreements, security agreenents and any other cbcuments establishing the interest of the applicant or any other person in the operation, acquisition or maintenance of the enterprise offering a massage. Rhe application shall also contain blueprints, diagraans, plans, layouts and the like showing the construction, revision, renoc7eling, alteration or additions of or to the premises and specifically shawing the layout, design and arrangement of the bathing and restroom facilities and the size and type of equipnent and facilities to be used. 125.05 �IJITNIS OF APPLICATIO�I PO�t �`!'I.FICATE ?!,[//PS6idS��ia.`�/�f�fi/�fr€/�(�i6X��ii�/i�/�f/ j��!/��ziX/�1d14f�L`�fl 125.10 �DITDOTIS C�iWF1�� OF C�I'IFICAZE l. Certificates shall be issued only to persons of good mora? characte_r_ �n_d repute and persons who are in good health and free from any communicable diseases whici� would diequalify the applicant fram �gaging in the practioe o� �ssage. 125.11 RF�S`IItICl'IJONS APID RHC�JiAT�iS 5. �'l�SE Ey�Zy licensee shall permit and allaw �n exam�nation anc] YKE inspection of everv �ar authoritv��,�� durin f�alY� ��fq6l6��e� �irfd ��rii� - •__ •,r • -� - of tihe pr�nises �y n volice f firQ or hQalth g �� business hours ld� � �1 �X1 �6¢fb�dtd�(�E �ix times each ypar. RPf»ca� to allow such r��s�r��rz�x��s��s�r��r��r�� t�i��/�6Mie�f /�f�X/as�yf�yf/f�+f�/Lt��/r��'��/rSa��/�kk�,�'d/�YI,6�ti��f 6f/��a�/�fit�Syl/6f/Yl�fr€/X,�fi.E�t�d/��,��//��S/11ISRda�fs'�,�J,/,�'tYc��(�k1�ii`r6'S�a��ff�( �fa��f ��/�fa�e��a'�/dt/�fa��rfi�/6f/t�Yf �i/�Mi�(TY/f �fif,�/��S/�dd /�6/Q,8�4'i�f� tYf a��Y�6��/Id�/��iQ�!/�rif f�,�i�+f 3Jid ��t f i�af �il6ri/�Kb�'if�'�/14�f,�J�E�f.(�/d��t,�h//�f �� t�(rtd/�f�rS�t�f/bfl�'�ld[/�r��!/lTYS,�/brbktS,t�a«¢!�'�'��t/bi/�Gl��i t �is�L��/�Yf �YY/1�/�trf�firf�d/dri/t�f �/Yi��fa'e�d/��E�Si��/�Id!/d�ri/f 6t /��i K�lbf�fiS/dd�l ��1 �la�j/��t�l,�fi6�/�lc��I�/bf1 /�l�/��il,t�'tlP�l i,4�ik�r/tlYIk19'tC�1d f Nirirf�ss�Y.�/��/i�f�/tdvfil�e�1/gi!�f��/ajaS�le�`rS�rSY_/�rid/��/�S�'IfY.�(t�l/f�f/,4/�'�'��! 6f I ri6�/1`��I �+f �ili�b�/��f �LI ////! 125.14 Rk.�OCATIC)N, SUSPENSIaN O�t NO�nTAL OF LI(�iSE Rhe lioense may be revoked, suspended or not renewed by the CitY Council upon recrnunendation of the City IKanager by shcywing that the licensee, its �aners, managers, enplayees, agents or any other interested parties, �5�*±t?merated ; n �t�on 125 04 w�th ��excegt;on of cred�tors have engaged in any of the follawing conduct: a,�ii��a��i��s��ri�,ai�r�i��s��i��i�r�i�rt�n�r��r�r�i�r�� !/�b�Yf�f�l�! 125.19 SEVF�IBILITY �-� - •� • • •� • �. • � • � �.� - �i o,� ^y. .� - •i� �� •. ' .� • �' :� •� • • •� • _�. I' 4� PASSID AND ADOPTID BY �IE CITY �tJNCIL OF �iE CITY OF FRIDLEY 7i�iLS I�1Y OF , 1982. AZTFST: SI�'Y C. Il�AiV - CITY CZIIZR Public Heari.ng: First Reading: seoond xearl'in9: Publish: 2/2/3/17 September 13, 1982 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR 2� � , 0 � 1`-� W N N Z > O a s a r= ^ V W O W O W ^ C I- > W .. 2 �a m t� S S W W �-+ 1� Y ~ � � n~.. v � C W 2 H � � N W K � O O � C J v 0 � � � � ,� � 0 M Y r � N � M � � r � '� r T V � M � w � M 4 �+ NY C C s � 9 L � � O � {.l t M O � � 4 t u � � r. .. o�� .� vo c Y. O M T � My Y � H p ,t �7 �+ � C S O T V � vv C Y A r � W L O �► v ti. u � O � C L r+ 6 .. M � r .• Of u'� O u�f O� �f O� � O �f Af M � O+ e+ pD Af � O+ N O+ �O O OD q f A N N �f! Pl Pf Il7 10 N Y! Pf • Y v 0 � a O .� N �f ♦ Yf � N M f � N A � � N �.1 M �+ My Yy M Y M M r Y �C C C C G C C C C C c C C r T T �''' r T T � T r � c � � � � � � � � � � � � o � { � � � � • � � i � t { � p � r.. � � � N N N N 1'f !'f M � ~ � f. L L � L L L L L L L L O �O i0 i0 �O �O O O O O �O i0 O r s s s== s s s s s s s= < � � �r F 3 � �, � � H • i.l � W � W � W C � � W r d � W d N My ! � u � O Z�y Z N C tW.7 N d � 0 � M � v v c 0 � M r r � � 0 � O L �E Ns S O C� �O v w �+ C A ry G � �w N t V �o O f1 > L y � T V N {J M w > Va t C H 4 m � � � w � � s a+ � � � � d � � N O d� � � .- � s � � � _ f � s ao N � � G ^ N _ N d ~ N � r G ^ N _ d � � f O. N � � Pf d � r�! i N I I� s r � � � {O � Y t C v E ++ F- � C r- IO J .� L O = � � N ♦ N N � f N N N � � N A N � r N �O � N N N � � � � � � N � � 0 L �9 � o m A N m • O� b � M A N �O � a f A � N � m �O � t W C 4 L 6Mi N co .-L OI {.i L i0 W � i„i � � � � � N b r 0 b � �o � �O f � N O� t � O� �O A i W � v �' .» c � � L � O� � � � � � � � � � A � � O � �O m �+f � C L O �1 'y s �� C N � N O 0 � � � O � � O O N Mg £ � � N O� O� � � 10 .� O� � � N 1'� � N O � A N � � Mp i L � � � ^ A A � �O v� � N � d0 b � • � ^ �O � � �O O� = • ! „'� �+ T O d d� g�C v m N � � O � b h O� N N � � � � l'9 O� � � � � O N � O� N � � � � � � 3A 0 � ❑ H �� r � ^ � � W C � �W �... d C W p N N � � Z i °j �w N 4 � • • 6 � � i !9 d � • .� N d � � � / d A � f � a N N � N = W � �z7 Bl O d v N i 1 �.r = W � N � ss < 1� N Z � W i H W C r W d C N N � W = H t H � N � G W � H � Z � f � d 1 i � � d r 1 i N 1 d � � i 1 _ � � � N N N N � � � � � o � � �D O N P! � N N N � � � � O� � m �D � � � � � O� O N N � � L W Y r � J M C 1-- v � ^ J N OI � C J m d � ^ N � N �O • � O N � ♦ � A N m N O� A � • ^ � � N � N � m � r O Pf !h n � Y L � �� f � m A � � ^ � v b � N � a t1'1 � b � N A �o �'f � b � !�f M � 1� Y � L r- r �e � �� M • � f O • � O �O�� O � O v N � � � m � � b N O 1� N O � ♦ � � 0 N V V �pJ O > L y >v � O � � � w � N �O 0 < b � A b f f � � b � > /� �.1 r � {.ir� ��q �vq � a� M � f O Nf b � e� N A � a � � r�f P � u'� � O ^ N � N 1'�f � d J �p F � � � W J[ V q i�- � J C t� O O O � P C �� A N O � O O O O O � � O O � M Np ` a 3B � N � � .. �� J � W � W > � OC W an p~, � W s �n Hy ` � � � � f N � �F O H f � s w� s � s . _ N 6 _ � � d � � T d � N J 1 7 = C • !rf C 1 � � N � _ C A N � d � N � � n = A � 1 1 G V Y N � � � _ 5 � � � � o � J � � u = _ _ � e � �. s Y � ."'� 1 G _ W e�f V1 1 d � � S N � a � � � d � _ A m � Pf m a � � m � 0 � N � N � � � e M ` r� > �a r O C O�m �" � � N � f ♦ Af O � m b e � � m N Cp N ]WC C O � {„� 4 i.7 ~ Q .°-� u c�Oi O N� 7� N m � A • v � Of1 � � � r O� N � N �L C w F- O �t �� m r+f � � U'1 1/1 .� N A M v O � V � O � N � NY �O e� � � A O� �O � f � f � �O O� � • f � r M N Nyyyr O �N^q 01 vm O � e� N a N �O � � � � O� Pf � � O� N Pf � � f i O H 3C , �� . v� W � W � Z O�C �W r p C W G N Ny ! � � � O 1� W � t- w N d � � . , d � _ d � .J i N 6 PI � � 1 d N'1 � _ • � G. � N C 1 � i a w� � 0 4 ff N • � _ Y [ N � � d [ J N n � � _ y r � � u d C N � , C = • y � � d t � � � s W n W • a d w ec r- � � d _ N � 6 � _ � � d _ M4 ]C �O Y p G v a+ v � H v� � �� O i� � �_ O e0 O- ^ � M � O N .�+. O � '- � �i n� a � wv�a ��m �D • N � n � � � � .r .- � N aD � N m �/'/ n N N A O � m P'f � O h � m � � f � � � � ti �o N � O� � N � W ♦ C � � � �� '�� 3D . 0 �� ... � • W � W � Wm e�e Z � W r• G OC W d N ` � � O � �O .- H d � • � d �n � � s' � � N 6 � i � � d � � _ • � 6 N � _ Pf � a N � N � 6 N � _ � d N � i � � d r / _ f 1 d � � w�� 1 d r _ d � 1 _ � d _ f � r � � N N N �D N � � N m � N m f I�+f �O r � �D • � N � A Al N N � g r� o� � • � N r � 01 � N r � O� � � � A � � � �l9 � � � A � O � � � O � � � r � � O �O �'9 f w A w N b � b A � e+f O ♦ � b � !'i � � r O e 9 � Y \ L a \ � r V� ►- N s �v c c � � u=� � ��=J�Y a��m � . � t � N � > � H � u W N N � � m N b �O � � N � �O � A N � � N � b N A N °o Ff � .- N A A � � � � O N 1�- L � Q Ci c G '�7 � g f � � � ^ A � �°De'► A �O � wf � � � Pf � � r O1 � � f�f n b r N Nf � C F- O Y C H � �r � ��l1 O � O � O � O � O N O � O I� � O � o � � r r � N O � O � N � � � � a � . 3E u � �"' �r J ^ W C W a� W r G C�. N H i � � �� N o i � 1 a PY _ �+l . s � � � N � d N'f � � � d w� 1 i � � a N 1 i rn � �+ b O W N � _ � N c°a ss � � � N r O � N > � � _ t H W {fl W � N � � _ ♦ d � 1 i � 1 O. r 1 i N � 6 r � _ � 0. _ a A ^ � e M ^ 0 ^ � v K b {19 !�! � a � ♦ � > .� r N M N� O Y�y- N q Q m m � � � � O� N N �D e� a �f'� � � � � O� t �+f � � N m � h N O�+ N r � e t � M1 O �O 1-- O � O i.� N f+ N H r J 7 � 0 O � A • � m � � � � O �o � ^ � � �ff � � � � � � � A �tf Ol b � � t 1� N H � d � � O N O O � � � o ' o � O O r o � O �n �O o � O � O � O N O � O � O � M V S L L � > O � ^ ^ � 0 O� � � 0 ^ � f � b � � � O� � e e >� N� O d d� w N q y ..rap Q � O � m t � � O� N � b � o� � � {p W I�+f � � W t�+f � N � O N A N Nf A f t � a� �O 1�1 r � � a � � m ^ N Af N O� � e� o� ^ N w� m �n • � N � � � � � O� Pf � � N N fA N 8 N � �O Pf � � m A O� � ^ M � 1 � v � � � C K }- L aM+ J � ~ �p O � � ^� 3F � ❑ �� u�.n. �r W � > �C W r p �W N NN < � � � W zm 1- W H G t � • 1 d � � _ � � d � I _ N 1 d f�l _ � � d � � � � 6 N � _ � � d C N W � � i Z H N � d u N OC = W C � � t d W C N H 1 i W � � H d � � • t d � 1 _ Pf � 6 � � _ N � d � 1 _ � d _ V W 1-� H � � O � C F- � •�= v H C $r b N • N � O r�►Y �� wNr � � �V� � � _ W � >W aZ O � t G r � Y � N «+ s Y = d� ~ �' � O S 4 � L� a � �� ' i v � H � A A f O� N _�� N � A O� O � wf m � � O� N t N < O� � w � c T O � CC W N � O O �� O O O O � � f M S � a 3G � ❑ �� f W � W � W �� W 1�' ..r p �W N N � � � �� ` C�'� N Ga � �m �� d� � � � �_ � N d � N � G � � i � � a � N � _ • � � d �p N 1 s � N d � O W N � _ r+ N N u ss ''� N c...1 � OC = W CW? O � Pf W �1 Z i � O � m � d �19 � 1 i d � d� � � i � � d N _ N � d � � � i d ' � _ a � � � � �D � h O� � � ♦ � � l+f r �O O� r ♦ V � � � m � � b �{'1 N N b � � h � � Y �p C �°.�° • a Y � � p� V � V (H � �. � � � � � O N � N � A ♦ M p � �+ M > �r O L 6ui G� � � Y. N �O F� � g--m � � � � O S m � • �! � s ae . s L • CC � � U N � � � "'O' d � 4 w O s � � a � � � N � t 1� 0 3� �� J � W � >m oc z �W n+ d C W d N N N � � � O ►� W N 0 � � �� Z �rou�n�L � ., L �n � t �r � � t �+ u v- � W �1 �+ N N W � 07NN� d v�v � ei ud cd v �� r ^, W C M C {IJ� �1 �7 �1�p� m b �� L L L!� r0 L • _� � � �O i0 r 61 : 6S�i�"�� w N O � C 0 : � � W � N � O N v � 7 t M w O M � � f H ^ � � 0o L W d� � � ^ a " � a1 O � � �r A .^- � i��► � � L N J � � ,O O .� � s � z ac a c� � C � 4 N �� z � H v7 r W M oc � b � O� p L Y � � t� O � _ «aocm ti N rj CCG Y „Z„ N.-��oC L V t O v�+r.- N� �''� O Y 6! .- C! 6! d7 � 7 m�N C 7 d !� 7 r J N p! GN CS " �.- O � � � i+L�-LLd�L _� q t q g ! O �O «NiYWJi.i � � ~ N � +� t..) _ ��go` �. ca � y � .- p r0 C {1 m r M� d O i yL � L !� i L � C Z SC,�9Z�NN M � M � ' � � L �C L i v V mL�7J>C�7� W 'o � O � O � y d � 1�p Ny N O7 Y�1 �1 N � = i {~i 4 �O i7'7 � p� C O C �� C!� Q, L ie .- A L r ip L � dddAAdA +'7C"�GZ"�i N � �! ~ � H � �1 M � t z V r+ G V C Cp C W � NN=J L M o[ � GO C ?�NH q N W r0 � l�t..t 0 O� !�� L O V � L L L�q L � C{I � «�ZJSZJ w Z v d' G. N G C i i.~� _ i.� L1C d N a s C cNov� O C piY- L NC LM- �1 6L1"��+�"lC� m N N Q� C C O � 01 W N �+LL�pr�1 « �YSi7 N N N9 i N+� N C � arda,a�v v c�z i� COC! d1v {i"�S� =CerOC� T��.V-W �� LC�LL r �Q q r� O « S76�i.i� � t~.1 Z i.� W C s �"f K _ P1 � u W d f9 O OC _ N v Z V W � d Of O OC s V Z V W C 6 � O C _ � {�i � �i OON �i O C N N 67C i0 C� �� 1� OZ �t Nr C U7 !�S L C !�� p {i C C�+� /0 ! ! /0 /0 Y vooa+u S mJ"�^lfOCD C O NC e N� C O '- i = w� �r e•-� vu�o= � W � L� �O 0�� 8 S C m J ♦ Y A C ♦+ O �t C N N L � d N > v8 N� C N s C{.�7 �e� Or+ S N S N N b N y NN W m C �Ci.NEMO OO�OOi00� * c��coecoc� C�p�1i�L C L L > �M c.+oaic m]C�aIC� {ICqN l�N� Cr �+N�+O.-10 M C L> � G W �O �1 �O � � # ^� f JJ W � "� O � •3I �� . �. W� W K W > � C �W ur d C W d N Ny i � � O �W S � � W �C C7 H t N G � > � W W Z "� � M J J �.. i 3J � � .�. _ �.�,��:�.�� :��.�:��_ S�CP� I: mat the ar�al bnaget a� the City of lrialry for the fiBCal ycar beginning January l, 1983 �fiici� hes bee� e�mitted bY ti�e CitY i�ra9e= and aodified and apprwed by �e City Oo�a�cil is bereby adoptea. �e r.ocai ae �ta mayet ana me �ajac divisio�s therea� being as faillws: (�. !mD Bb`rDQ�� dF RHP�� General ProperLy mz b�ecial ]lssesaoents I.ioenees Qor�tractacs B�usis�ess Other � Petmita Grants and Sharec] Ta�es Q�azges for Services Fines and Forfeituires 7nterest i�rnitgs Other Misoellaneous Revenue Insuranoe Ref�na �ot�ae ana Fire Pensiocf� �ansfers Seal Ooat3irg state Aia surplus Revern�e Sharirg Pts�d Liquor P�►d G�eral F1md Sutpins i3,019,600 5,700 ss,000 128�000 5,000 95,000 1,Y11�000 1l2�000 ].12,350 260�000 42.000 130�000 70,000 70,000 280,000 ],50,000 510�000 Ge�leral CsOpeLno�lt Legislative G�eral ar� Fir�r►ncial ttanngenent Central Serviaes (Civic Center/Deta Prooessing) Public Safety Police and Civil Defense Mre Public t�orb Co3e Enforoesnent ard Planr�irg f�ngineezing and Public Works Maintenar�ae Reccest3an Naturalist ana Parks and Recreatiaa Feserve i 1�5,5�9 686,145 172,300 1,880,325 �26�961 316,�65 1,080,121 1,247,�00 352,390 �'11l�Ls GH�R�1i. lOIO i6,307,659 56,307,659 d�FR PUI� SYBCIIlT. REVi2i)E PtJIZS �� a �� 6.�0 316,700 x��e sr►�� ,a� zso,000 zso,000 c�e zv so,000 so,000 �r sa�vicB poras (�vic Centes Bm8 Ptad �0,000 '�,� GPITAi. P4m►7�.T POl� Capital Im�xovanent Ptmd 91,100 94,100 ZO��Ls O�IDHi PC)t� i 780�800 i 780.800 ��: � � �.Ogg.�9 i7.088,459 SH(.TDON 2s �►at the City lsanayez be directecl to cause t2�e appcapriate acoo�mt3ng entries to be macie in the books a� !he CLty. PASSED 11PID I�llOF�liD BY � QfiY CnUNCII. OF 'IIiE QTY OF PRIT[.EY '�IS DP,Y OF 0(.TOiBSt, 1982 � CITY Q,FRK - SICt�Y C. II�1N Public Hearing: Septeaber 13, 1982 First Reaciing: Sep�tenber 27, I982 Second Readfng: October �, 1982 Pub�li.ehs Oc�ober ]3� 1982 1RA7t0�t - W7LLIAM J. 2� 4 �E c�rv oF � � FRIDLEY Housini� end REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FROM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE September 20, 1982 SUBJECT HRA PURCHASE OF CITY PR�PEP.iY FOR ThE OFFIC DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULED FOR PHASE II OF CENTE CITY DEVELOPMENT Nasim Quresh John Flora MEMORAN�U TO MEMO N0.82-68 5 ACTIONI INFO. Please see the attached Housing & Redevelopment Authority resolution requesting the sale of City property to the HRA for the construction of a 35,000 square foot office building being proposed by "Fridley Plaza Office Building Partnership". The Authority has approved the building proposal and site layout�, and has authorized the execution of the contract documents with the developer. The timing on the project has been set for a construction start of October 27, 1982. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority is requesting a direct sale of City property under the location of the building at $2.00 per square foot. This property will be sold and deeded directly to the developer. The HRA is also requesting a contract purchase on the rest of the City property that will be owned by the Authority and leased to the developer for parking. We will be providing for mutual use easements over the entire parking area for the purpose of shared parking. Because of the timing proposed the necessary action as soon as action items for your reivew so and the Housing & Redevelopment JLB/de Attach: X for start of construction, it will be important to take possible. I am also attaching a propoed schedule of that these items can be coordinated with the City Council Authority. .•.��, .: :. x� a�nn�cE x�Tna� sv �e s� oF x�w �s aFn� BY THE CI'1'iC OF FRIDI,BY TO HOUSING AUTHORITY FOR OFFICE BUILDING Rhe Co�cil of the City of Fridley does ordain as follvws: S�CTDON 1. �hat the Center City Redevelopment District was established for the prcmotion of the im�xavenent of the district for the health, safety and general w�lfare of the City of Fridley. SD(,TION 2. �e City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract of land within the City of Fridley, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, described as follows: �e Southerly 40 feet of Lot 12, Block 2, Rees' Addition to � FYidley Park including the westerly 3.63 feet of adjacent vacated alley ric�t-of-way= along with the Northerly one-half of the adjaoent 64th Avenue right-of-way. SHCI'ION 3. It is hereby determined by the City Council that the Council in the interest of granoting �the Center City Redevelopment District is hereby authorized to sell said property. SDCT1nN 4. 2he Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the neoessary deeds to effect the sale of the above described real estate. PASSED AND ADOPTF� BY 'l�IE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 27TH IaAI' OF SF�TII�IIt, 1982 WII�,IAM J. I�E - MAYt�R AZ�T: SIDNEY C. IIvfi9AN - CITY Q�F�tR First Reading: Second Reading: Publish: 3/27 5A � •.�� , ♦: : • l�ii � RPl�T7l� 1l� '�E SALB � RF1�i. �'tE Q�iA� BY �(��'Y pF FRIII�C TO HOUSING AUTNORITY FOR PARKING LOT 7he Co�mcil of the City of FYidley does ordain as follows: SDCTD0�1 l. R�at the Center City Redevelopment District was established for the pranotion of the irr�ravenent of the district for the health, safety ar�d general w�e].fare of the City of Fridley. SDCTION 2. 7�e City of Fridley is the fee o�wner of the tract of land withi.n the City of FYidley. Anoka County, State of Minnesota, described as follaws: �he Southerly 12.8 feet of Lot 6, along with all of Lots 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, Block 2, Rees' Addition to Fridley Park _ including the Easterly 8.37 feet of adjacent vacated alley right-of-way; along with the Northerly one-half of the adjaoertt 64th Avenue tight-of-way. SnC`rION 3. It is hereby determined by the City (;ouncil that the Council in the interest of promoting the Center City Redevelopment District is hereby authorized to contract to sell said property. SDCT�ON 4. Z'he Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the necessary oontracts to effect the sale of the above described real estate. PASSED AND ADOTlI'ID BY ZfIE CITY OF FRID�.EY TAIS 27�1 DAY OF SEP'I'FI�'ff3ER, 1982 W]I.�LIAM J. NEE - MAYOR A2TFST: SIDNEY C. I.NMAN - CITY Q�F�iR First Reading: Seoond Reading: Publish: 3/28 : m RESOLUTION N0. HRA 6-1982 . A RESOLUTIOI�t � 7'HE HOUSItf6 AND RmEVELOPIElR AUTI�ORITY � 1HE CITY OF FRIOLFY TD REOUEST 7HE SALE OF CITV PROPEAIY TO TNE ll�iA ' FOR THE OEVEt.OPlfENT OF AN OF�it� BUILDIN6 LOCIITID IN PNASE -II � - OF 7HE CENTER CIiY REDEIIEi.�T PR0.ICCT � MHEREAS� the F�idley Housin8 snd Redeveiopment Authority has app�oved the cont�acts fo� the deve[opment ot a 35,000 squere foot office building to be loceted in Phase II of the Center City Redevelopment Project; snd MHEREAS, the office proJect will requirs the acquisition of a certsin portion ot' City property to devetop the proJect; snd 1�MEREAS� the Authority has previously epproeched the City Council with pretimine�y plens and purchase of the required property end heve BotLen concepL epprovel on the project. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOWED by the Housing end Redevelopment Authority of the City of Fridtey to formally request the sele of the fcllowing described property by the City of F�idiey Houstng end Aedevelopment Authority: The Southe�iy 40 feet of Lat 1 2, Block 2, Ree's Addition to Fridlsy Park includin8 the Mesterly 3.63 feet of edjecent vecated atlsy �ight-of-wey; etong wiLh tha Northerly one-helf of the edjecent 64th Avenue right-of-waq. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMEN7 AUTHORITY OF TNE CI7Y OF FRIDLFY 1NIS 16TH DAY OF SEP7MBER� 1982. CHAIRMAN H�USING AP1D REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ATTEST; DcECUTIYE QIRECTOR � C � '�. . . � - ��...�,!�-!�.�..a^`�'�T��TtT' ." �-.T^-. t��'.�►�."'!" T.� �. .. r— �a � <;,tY�y� � . , l . - - . . _ . . . ' . � . . r . 1 � . . . . . ' . . ' . . �3 : . �. � . � . . - � . . . ; . , 5 D . _ ._ ,� __ . _ . - - -. , - • . �; � . ._ .. • -' _ - r . - , � .. , t _ - ' ._ + . . i : ' ' ' • . ... . - . - . _ ' � " . . - . ' . _ . ..j •_ 'i , - ,- - , _ -. .... - _ _ ..�• . - -' . . ': . � _. �. • � - � . ' . = • ' " ., ,` . . : . . . . -. _ _ .'� . � �t� l.` ' . .� � . ' . . , . . .-_ . .r- ---- - -`�.--- _. . . - :. � _ -� � _ - - � . ��_ - _. + -. _ _ � . � �. � •. _ - _ - s_ .: - . .. . : ' - � { -, . i . , � . . - :. . ; +--- - - - - - - - - - - - -� t-- -- - =' - - �- - - - - - - - �', � :� � � � � �� . � � _ t . . i i . � .. � ts • I 1 �. - t � � . � � 1 1 ^ ". , — — — — — — — — — — � f -- 5� i �y �io�.o s � ��_�r t- , R s c��,�� soi� �� . ; �,s � � 13%�.4 �o$ �a��r9 . }� I 1 _ �It4 3 t - _ _ . _ _ _-- _ _ ..._ -- _ ._ _ -� ; }- - - - -- --- - -- - _-- --- _ 1 � � � i � � � -,4 AD 'I;TION s � . i �! f---- - - - -- - - - -- - - -- -� � - - -- - - -- - - - ---- i , + � . � 13 3.6 ' i �Q 0 W � � � a 0.W' .. � . � _� 1�� v �. � _.. . _ � � C,rr �iop�s�fy �� , ql;��c� SQIl2 TO N�PA TQ . . .� ' �OT' �/TT�tZ°��*I �r! 'q.3r0 �(� �t �• �8.�zo NrPA - ��a�E�rr_ � �_ � -. � - _ � �.�. - � "--� Fo�2 O��ce�t,,/c/;n�- Ri . . . . . . � .14 � � .� --t- �� -----------� � � �. ..� .� � .� �.. � � � ..� _ i. . i � .. . " : ! � , �� _ - L.r ��_`_ _..__-- ,�.5 � 812 '� e► 1=':�7l, to2t1 - � � �I�PA /�ROPEt rr Fo�e �qaKiiv_G �ZSC _ _ . )�EY �. _ -- , . 1 � . . . -�' �. �.� � . = '- ��.- . . i— � — — =- -- — — .._ � .._ _ � _.._ _ ' " ...133'--•. ! - — ��.� - . -.aaz�a'_- - ; �. :- ` '3 P � RK� _�� . 2 .-�� . , -. :,� . �' . _ _ . �- ---- - _ �-- - -�- - _ -- _ -� ��-. _ _ _.._ _ _ _ - - - - ---. � • _. � _ - • ' - � 1. .� y• ' - .• �. ., , • _ •, f . � i H � : _ � � ; 3E ESTIMATED SqiEDULE FOR QFFICE BUILDING DEVELOPNENT Septembe� 22� 1982 — Removel af basemente of 362 end 378 64th September 23� 1982 — Stert Serer & Meter project on 64th Ave. September 24, 1982 — 6et easeme�t fo� roadwey ecross Fridtey garage signed. September 27, 1962 — City Ccuncil MeeLing *Review of overelt plet & building style *First Reading of en Ordinance spproving sele of City property to the HRA for oFfice building. •First Reading af en Ordinence approving contrect purchese of City property to HRA for perking fecility *Set sele of HRA bond for November 1� 1982 September 28� 1982 — Sign contract documents Nith "Fridley Pleza Office BuiLding Pertnership" September 30, 1982 — work with VFW and Americen Legion on the relocetion of Eisenhower Square Monument October 1, 1962 — Work Mitfi Chuck Boudreeu on the removal of unde�ground sprinkting and moveble lendscepe in Eisenhower Squere October 4, 1982 — City Council Meeting #First Reeding of the Vacetion of that portian of 64th Avenue for the Office Building. *Second Reeding of en O�dinence on property sale *Second Reading of an Ordinance an contrect sele of property October 19, 1982 — Housing 6 Redevelopment Meeting Resolution requesting City Counait epprovel of sale of 51,400,000 in Industriel Development Bonds for the construction of en epproximete 35,000 sq. ft. office building. *Resolution approving the constructian plans of the office building as submitted by Fridley Office Building Partnership October 20, 1982 — Complete removal of monume�t, SF sprinkling systsae, end �oveeble landscape. Completion Of ner 64th Ave. October 22, 1982 — 6round breaking ceremony October 25, 1982 — City Council Meeting * Second reading of Yacstion of 64th Avenus # IRB sale epprovel for office building October 26, 1982 — Removel of conc�ete end blecktop of street & Perking lot end underground sewer & water tines under building footprint. October 26, 1982 — Clostng on IR Bonds fo� Office Building Octobar 27, 1882 — Construction Stert — move on site November 1, 1982 — City Council Meeting • HRA Bond sste epprovel. s►+E c�TV oF � � � � =RIDLEY HOUSING and REDEVELQPMENT AUTHORITY FROM EXECUTIVE DiRECTD �AT E September 22, 1982 SUBJECT Approval of New 35,000 sq. ft. Office Building Nasim Qureshi John Flora MEMOR ANDU TO MEMO NO. 82-72 SG ACTION INFO. X X The Housing & Redevelopment Authority at their September 16, 1982 meeting, approved the concept site plan and building plan for the 35,000 sq. ft. office building. They also set the limitations for use on the building as part of the Contract Documents. I am enclosing copies of the plan and use restrictions for your reivew and submittal to the City Cauncil. JLB/de � � - , 64th AVE. . - SITE PLAN �� : ,-0 ;'= ;v=G' � 0 I . � b. NORTH SH ( � ; . � . �a..ti,:4. , .. ---.... ._ . Q �----.-� .��. � __ � 'lw . , -�_ ._� . ;�. , . _ �_ U � ' I `� . ' -- Ebr. E i..��wa! _y . ' �y�. E� . �p� ,j.� vsf.r.�,�. 1 % . �.•. � , ' 8�a p �.tig .':C�� ' •—_ � 4 •� : ' P_b ��'�►`�i � i .6... t�1}� . wer� • 0 : � . : �U��:�. f .� ' :I .I -�. - ,. • .i . ' ' .y. - — �, w F��ir'wG.. - � ,.. , .. ...� � � 5I �� O —; ' ` - - — - .. ..` • •�i•i�., �,.�Q .. � • I . . = NJ�1;`�� +�� srp� ' ( j �, • j , . . . 1 � „i,_`�7 t '�r''•�•�-'•'••, 's , - 1 � � ...�.. ��-t v� . ! i . . ; . ti.�. :.�.. � � i, ,:/, - �:r• , . o- . � , _,_ . , ; . � .,. �.. __ .;. . •., , . , . . �" .. � • �. ;._,... , , - _•. :!. .` . t'.'►. �hJc'g ; ; . . ' i • ' - . _ ^ " • . , , .� .,:�,;.,..: , i . � „• , r.: . � ::�- _ .: .�: � ,:�. � ► �ay e � . . . , � . i . : � � !_ ^'4`ri1G ;' � r..,: r.i-.�;. �.�!'!:� . ( � ..{ ,� .. „ ' . i . � .�. -� . . . - ��. .:..; :;: '. � 4 � . � - �. - � - • • -� - i : r- � - �� .. • . ;f,, 'y ,: :, .., t ; r . o- . . : -_ . - - --� . . �� . . . , . . _ , --- - - �,��:. - � _ .-_.. , _... _ - - -- - .- .. _ - . . .,.,�., . . . , � ' - �-, ' :' : � . - . -- - �. •rs; �, : ;..iy .� ;'_ s_ .. -f��. ' . . . - .- • , !. ' . , _ %.. :. f =., I ' 'r -' - �_ •� ',. f'.. ,. i. :;i • J . R'! - •i . •/ . • I� ' % 'J I � �t'. . � . - • • • _ � • � .s , : , • I � : t.- , Y., f,�,.sl` ;i,` /IJfi .. . . . • - _ '.1-• • • �. _ � - . .. i � . ...• .. . � � . . • . .� . 1. �. - � FIRST FLOOR PLAN - �g.� 5�-+,: ;,��o�� 'h' ,� b:.L!' ro�� . . . � _ ..._ ..,, , _ . --• �.. -_ .�.�,,.,,�„�_..� ,,...-._ � _� r .. _ _ _------ -- � _. 'r'�: a ""'��l+d"s4a','�'`"_ ��-a:afc�'�4'• ..i. T -....,►7._. __ ' � ' _ _ _ .� .. . _�_ � _.' � - � � _'�'== - 0 5K t� The Redeveloper will oomply With all the rules, regulations, and relevant orders af �e Agency ad�pted pursuant to this Se�ction 10.2. fe) Tt�e R�edevelaper Will furnish all infonaation and repozts required by the Agency and will permit aooess to the Rec3eveloper's books, recards, ana aca�unts by the Agenc.y for purposes of investigation to ascertain oo�lianoe with such rules, regulations, and ordere. _ (f) In the event of the Redeveloper's noncompliance with the nonaiscrimination clauses of this Section� or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, and failure to remedy such non-ooR�liance within sixty t60) ciays after reoeiving writt� notive or complaint thereof, the Agreement may be canceled, terminated, or suspen3ed fn whole o� in part. (g) The Rec3eveloper will include the pravisions of Paragraphs (a) throu gb (f) of this Section in every contract or purchase order, and will require the inclusion of tihese pravisions in every subcontract entered into by any of its oontractors, unless exenp�tec3 by rules, regulations or orders of the Agercy, so that such provisions will be binding upon each such oontractor, subcontractor, or vendor, as the case may be. Zhe Re3evelaper will take such action with respect to arry oonstruction �ntract, subcontract, or purchase orcier as the Agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncat�liance : Provided, bawever, 7hat in the event the Redeveloper becomes involved in, or f s threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or ven3or as a result of such direction by the Agency, the Redevelaper may request the Agency to enter into sud� litigation to protect the interests of the Agency. Fbr the purpose af incluc�ir�g suc� provisions in any construction conttact, subcontract, or purchase orc3er, as required hereby, the first three lines of this Section shall be changed to read 'During the performance of this Contract, the Contractor agrees as follows: "and the term "Redeveloper" shall be d�anged to "Contracto�.' th) �e Redeveloper agrees that it will use reasonable best efforts to encourage participation by minority controlled contractors and subcontractors in the oonstruction, c�peration and maintenance of the Redevelopment Property and Minimum Improvements, and will use reasonable best efforts to encourage participation and utilization of minority and female persons in the construction, operation and mainter�ance of the Redeveloptnent Property and the Minimum Impravements. Section 10.3, it�strictions on Use. 7rie Redeveloper agrees for itself, and its sucoessors and assic�,s, and every sucoessor in interest to the Re�developm�nt Praperty, or any part thereof, that the Redeveloper, and such successors and assigns, shall devote the Redevelopcnent Property to, and only to and in accorc3ance with, the uses specified in the Redevelopnent Plan anc3 this Agreenent which use is offioe �and related uses (inclu+ding without limitation those uses allawed in CR-1 Zoning along with small retail/service shops such ass art shops, professiorsal studios, clothing, pharmacyr oonfectionary, stationazy, music, gift and notion shops, barbers, beauticians, jewelers, watchmakers, -30- 5L j� locksmiths ot e and shall not discriminate upon the bnsis of r . r x or nationaJ. origin in the sa].e, lease, v� rental or in the use or occupancy of �e R�elopnent Property or any improve�ents erected or to be erected thereon, or any part therea�. Sectim 10.l. 8ours a�rd Rages. �e Rec3evelaper oovenants ar�d agrees that it will aorc�ly with the wage and hour standarc3s issued by the United States Secretary of Labor pursuant to the Davis- Bacon Act, 40 D.S.C. SS 27ba TO 276a-5, as iunended, and the Contract Work Hvurs and Safety Standarcls Act, 40 U.S.C. SS 327 333. Sectian 10.5. Pravisians Fat Mergea Nith Deea. None of the pravisions of this Agreement are intencied to or shall be merged by re+ason of the Redevelap�nt Property Deeci and ar�y such c3eed shall not be de�ned to affect or impair the prwisions and covenants of this Agreenent. Se�ctioci 14.6. Titles c� Atticles ana Sectians. Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and Sections inserted for convenience of reference only and shal oonstruing or interpreting any of its pravisions. Section 10.T. Notioes and D�r�s. of the Agreenent are 1 be disregarded in ESccept as otherwise expressly pravided in this Agreenent, a notice, demand, or other oorcIIruanication under the Agreement by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or c3elivered if ft is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, retxun reoeipt requested, or delivered personally, and (a� In the case of the Rec3�velaper, is addressed to or delivereci personally to the Redeveloper �10 Mark Hac�g.Q,st�yj t 250 8yj] er� f'�x_�hanqe, M�rL�Pano1L�,�1. „`+54�: an_d (b) In the case of the Agency, is addressed to or 8elivered personally to the Agency at 6431 Un�versity Avenue Northeast, Fridley. Minnesota 55432, or at such other address with respect to either such party as that party may, from time to time, desic�ate in writing and forward to the other as pravided in this Section. Section 10.@. (7ounterpests. Zhis Agrees►ent is executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instr�m►es►t. Section 10.9. Terminatioc�o� Agreement. (a) If, on the date that the Redeveloper receives the Certificate of Canpletion with respect to the Minim�n 7mpravements, the deed which f s on file and of record with respect to the Redevelc�nent Property is the -31- [:� CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COM�MISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 Cf4Ll TO ORDER• Chairwoman Schnabel called the September 15, 1982. Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. .ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ms. Schnabel� Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Kondrick, Ms. van Dan. Mr. Saba Mer�bers Absent: Mr. Svanda Others Present: Jerrold 6oardman. City Planner Kent Hill. Administrative Assistant - Bob Barnette, City Council Ed Na�ernik, City Council Ruth Dunn, Fridley Sun � Charles Hooley, President. Cub Foods Don Pollard, Director of Real Estate. Cub Foods Shelley Johnson, 8arton-Aschman Robert Schroer, 7624 University Ave. N.E. John Crouch, representing Kunz Oil Company See attached l i sts �,�� =�d a- �o-��-�� APPROVAL OF AUGUST 18, 1982. PLANNING CODIMISSION MINUTES: AO?'ION BY PLS. VAN DAN, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 28� 2982� - PLANNING COI�lMISSIDN 1►IINUTES AS i�►RITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MDTZON [7iRRIED UNANIPlDUSLY. 1. PUBLIC NEARING: REZOP�ING REQUEST, ZOA #82-05, BY CUB FOODS: Rezone fram -2 eavy �'naustria areas, to C- S genera s opping areas), Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 78, to allow the construction of a new retail shoppin9 area, the same being 450 - 73rd Avenue N.E. MOTION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY JJR. SABA� TO OPEH THE PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #8Z-O5, SY CUB FOODS. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE PUALIC XEARING OPEN AT 7:35 P.PI. Mr, Boardman stated this proposal is to rezone this parcel from heavy industrial (M-2) to general shopping (C-2S). The general shopping zone allows the type of uses that generate large traffic and traffic parking areas. The propasal submitted 6A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 PAGE 2 initially was for the rezonin� of the entire M-2 area, approximately 27 acres. There has been some modificat�on to that� and Cub Foods has reduced the request t� rezone only the property facing the University Ave. service drive. The property in back will remain industrial (M-2). He stated he wauld now turn the meeting over to representatives from Cub Foods who would give their presentation. Mr. Charles Hooley stated he was the President of Cub Foods. He introduced -Mr. Don Pollard, Director of Real Estate for Cub Foods, and stated Mr. Pollard would present their proposed plan. Mr, Pollard stated this is a 27-acre site. After rezoning approximately 17.2 acres, Cub Foods would take up approximately half of that land. They woutd also have a 40,000 sg. ft. drugstore, 10,000 sq. ft. of small shops, and a restaurant. Ne stated they have landscaped the area. They have a parking ratio for the entire site of 7.26 cars per 1.000 sq. ft. They have honored the City's setback off 73rd Ave. of 100 ft. which runs the entire distance of 73rd. Ms. Schnabel asked if Cub Foods had any tenants in mind for the other portions of the shopping area. � Mr. Pollard stated they have tenants in mind, but have no contracts with them at this point. ' Mr. Kondrick asked what the setback was between the service road and the buildinq. Mr. Pollard stated the setback was about 400 ft. Ms. Schnabel asked what the distance would be from 73rd Ave. to the Cub store itself. Mr. Pollard stated there was over 600 ft. from 73rd to the Cub store. Mr. Pollard stated trailer storage would be between the buildings so they would be screened entirely from 73rd. Mr. Saba asked about the hours of delivery. Mr. Pollard stated the delivery hours are 6 a.m. - 5 p.m.; however, there would be some evening deliveries because the operation would be open 24 hrs. a day. Ms. van Dan asked from what direction would the trucks be entering Cub Foods, and what route would Cub Foods recomnend they enter the operation? Mr. Poilard introduced Mr. Shelley Johnson from Barton-Aschman, who had done the traffic study for Cub FoodS. Mr. Johnson stated most of the trucks will probably come from the south from 694. After the first time deliveries are made. drivers can be instructed on how they should approach the store. From a traffic perspective. the trucks could . : PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 PAGE 3 use�either the intersection at 69th b University or the intersection at 73rd b Uriiversity. Both intersections have sufficient capacity to acconmodate the volume of truck traffic generated by the store, so the truckers could use which- ever intersection was easier for tfiem to negotiate. Ms. Gabel asked how close the first entrance was into Cub Foods from 73rd Ave. �and was it a two-way entrance? _ Mr. Pollard stated the distance was approximately 220 ft, and it was a two-way entrance. Ms. Schnabel stated that in their agenda material� some comment was made in the traffic study about possibly changing the road configuration by repositioning the restaurant and perhaps going out behind the restaurant. Mr. Johnson stated that in the"Traffic Impact Analysis" done by Barton-Aschman Association for Cub Foods, they did point out that there is a potential way to solve a problem that may arise in the future. The vehicles that enter and exit this site may in the future create enough volume to possibly warrant a traffic signal on 73rd. They do not know enough about the numbers and what is going to happen further to the south to say for sure that there may be a need for a signal. So, what they have said is that an option should be kept avaitable to the development and the City that says if a signal should ever have to go in there, it can exist 400 ft. from the 73rd b University signal. However, if the roadway was further detached to the east and brought up on the back side of the property. that would put approximately another 300 ft. of space between signals, which was more desirable from a traffic signal standpoint. What they are saying is that this is a little better design if a signal is ever necessary. Mr. Hooley stated he would like to show some slides to more familiarize the Planning Cammission and those in the audience with what the Cub Store wou7d look like if they were located in this area. Mr. Nooley stated they are very pr�ud of the cleanliness they maintain in and around the store. He stated all the garbage and refuse created in the store goes directly into compactors and containers outside. All trucks back up to the dock, and all handling of refuse or product occurs within the store. Maintenance continues 24 hrs, a day, both inside the store and outside the store. Mr. Hooley stated this new store would create 123 more jobs for the people in Fridley. Their tax base per year would be around $4-500,000. Mr. Richard Almstead, would be into the area Mr. Johnson stated on generate approximately day". A "design day" determine whether or n 7311 Tempo Terrace, asked what the estimated traffic flow on a 24-hr. basis, 7 days a week. an average day, the development,as they analyzed it, will ]0,000 vehicles, 5,000 in and 5,000 out, for a"design is the day they use and the peak hours of the day to ot the roadways are adequate. But, on a design day which [�� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING L SEPTEMBER 15. 1982 PAGE 4 is that day that wi11 occur approximately 20-25 days a year. there will be ap.p'roximately 12,000 vehicles, 6,000 in and 6.000 out. He stated they must remember that of these numbers, some of the traffic is already out on the road- ways and is not all new traffic. � Mr. Almstead asked if Cub Foods had any kind of solution for the homeowners on the north side of 73rd on hwo they can compensate for the increased traffic -�low, the noise at 2 a.m. Sunday morning or Saturday evening, and the access to Locke Park from 73rd. Mr. Hooley stated he had done some research on the traffic and pedestrian problem. He had checked back into the records for Super Valu for five years, and a pedestrian has never been struck by a semi-trailer. Mr. Pollard stated the property is presently zoned M-2. Cub Foods could come in and build a warehouse for all the Cub Foods to handle all of their trucks under the present zoning. Also, other manufacturers and distributors could come in, acquire the property, and with the rail spur that exits right now to the back side of the property, they could run ten times as many trucks out of there and could hire employees that work around the clock. He stated one thing with a Cub store is that all their traffic is split up. There are only so many cash registers. so only so many people are leaving the store at one time. Mr. Hooley stated they complaint about either allowed a parking area be a problem. have 11 Cub stores right now, and they have never had a noise or traffic. He stated that in this plan, they have behind the store for trailer parking so that would not Mr. A1lan Quam, 399 - 73rd Ave., stated they felt that in Cub's zeal to expand and increase its income, Cub Foods has demonstrated a tota7 lack of sensitivity and regard for their neighborhood. He stated Cub had obviously done splendid market research, a traffic study, and untold planning sessions and hours; yet, no one involved in the community had been approached by Cub to see how the people felt about Cub maving into their neighborhood. It could have saved Cub a lot of time and money. He stated the people were at the meeting to demonstrate to Cub Foods that they do not want Cub on that site; and if Cub persists, the peop7e can only assume that Cub Foods does not care about the neighborhood. Mr. Quam stated that two City Council members suggested two ways for the neighbor- hood to demonstrate their feelings--a good turnout, and a petition. He stated this petition has 394 names, and a cover letter is attached to the petition. He stated he would like to read some of the points from that letter: 1. This is a residential nrea. A shopping area would be an eyesore to our neighborhood. 2. 3. Existing business is buffered by a greenway and not located directly on 73rd Ave. We feel this would most certainly lower the value of our property. . 1 PLANNING CONMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 __� � PAGE 5 -"4. 73rd Ave. is a thoroughfare. The traffic level has already reached .;' the saturation point, Any increase in traffic would malce access to and from the Melody Manor addition very difficult and dangerous. Melody Manor residents have only two intersections through which to enter or exit 73rd Ave.; both of which are currently hazardous at peak hours. 5. 6. (Mr. Quam stated the people on Rice Creek Blvd. seem to-be very con- cerned, because of the problem they have now in getting in and out. He stated that in using the figure of 6�200 cars per day, assuming 80% enter the service raad between the hours of 8-10 p.m., that means a car on that road every 10 seconds.) Residences would be subjected to considerable and undesirable debris. noise and disturbances. This property abuts Locke Park and is located near other parks, schools, and churches. Increased traffic in this area gives us great cause for concern regarding tfie safety of our children, in walking or riding bikes to or from these locations. Mr. Quam stated they are respectfully requesting that the integrity of this neighborhood be preserved with the denial of this request for rezoning. PlOTION 8Y MS. GABEL� SECONDED BY MR. OQUIST, TO RECEIVE 7'XE PETSTION REQUESTZNG TNE DENIAL OF REZONING REpUBST NZOA �182-OS BY CUB FOODS. UPON A VOSCE VOTE, ALL VOTSNG A YE, CXAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated this petition would go with the Planning Co�runission's recommendation and minutes to City Council. Mr. Bill Boatman, 531 Rice Creek Blvd., stated the reason they got a traffic signal at 69th & University was because they signed a petition� and the neighbors agreed to pay for it to help protect their children, Now that stop light that was paid for by the neighborhood is going to be used by Cub Foods. Mr. Frank Waks, 7574 - 4th St. N.E, stated that the people in Melody Manor know that most people in this area who are going to travel to Northtown are not going to buck the traffic lights; they are going to travel through Melody MSanor to get to Northtown. Mr. Waks asked if Cub Foods had ever considered looking at the piece of property on the corner of Mississippi St. and University which is owned by the City. Mr. Boardman stated the City has approached Cub Foods about this piece of property and Cub Faods has laoked at it, but the Super Yalu screen�ng board has advised Cub that this is not a suitable location for a Cub store. �'L PLANiVING COMMISSION MEETINGLSEPTEMBER 15. "1982 � � _ _�___ _ __QAGE 6 Mr, Pollard stated the City Staff has shown them a71 the real estate available in the City of Fridley, to his knowledge. . Mr. Nooley stated they fiave toured all the locations in Fridley, and they felt that 8.8 acres was not quite adequate for their store. They felt the location on 73rd and University was the most desirable ]ocation. .1�R. Stan Kowalski, 7450 Tempo Terrace, stated that if Cub Foods moves to this location, Schoal Dist. 16 is losing a tax shelter. Mr. David Thiele, 73D0 Tempo Terrace, stated that the majority of the people present at the meeting shop at Cub Foods. He stated they were not against Cub Foods, but are against Cub Foods in this location. Ms. Alice Rassier, 7540 Tempo Terrace, stated she was concerned about Fridley itself with the buildings that are sitting empty right now and all the ]ittle restaurants and shopping centers Fridley already has. She was concerned about adding another shopping center. being so tlose to Northtown, because she thought the �eighborhood is looking cr.umby. � Ms. Judy Quam, 399 - 73rd Ave., asked what Cub Foods would do as far as noise abatement. � Mr. Nooley stated they would be doing a lot of landscaping. He stated Cub has 11 stores. 7hey have residences all around those stores; and to his knowledge, they have never had any complaint about excessive noise or excessive traffic. Mr. Dan Nagen, 7390 Lyric Lane, asked what Cub intended to do with their old store. Was it going to turn into another empty building? Mr. Hooley stated they do not have any plans for the old Cub store at this time. Ne stated that type of store with the vast open area inside and the parking area is not hard to rent. Mr. Hagen stated they are all concerned about the traffic noise. Mr. Shelley Johnson stated that in talking about the number of vehicles cominq into and out of this devetopment, they must remember that nat all the vehicles will be on 73rd. not all of the vehicles will be on 73rd east of the frontage road, not all the vehicles are going to be on 73rd west of the frontage road, and not all the vehicles are going to be on the frontage road south of this site. 7he traffic will be divided. According to what they have estimated, approximately 28-29% of the traffic departing this site wi11 utilize 73rd to the east of the frontage road, approximately 35� coming from the north on University will utilize 73rd west of the frontage road, and approximately 36-37X coming from the south on University will probably utilize 69th and use the frontage road past Columbia Arena. Mr. Bob Wienert, 7311 Lyric lane, stated he was the one who took the petition to the people who live on Rice Creek Blvd. and informed them of this re2oning request. He stated there is a portion of Rice Creek Blvd, that is virtually landlocked; there is only one road in and out. Proposing approximately 3,000 more vehicles going in and out of that area is ridiculous. � GF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING,�SEPTEMBER 15� 1982 PAGE 7 Ms. Karen Dove. 7305 Jackson St.. stated they have a lot of traffic on Jackson Sire�t because of Unity Hospital. The quality of life in their Reighborhood is such that people do a lot of walking and bike riding, especially in the early evening. _Early evening is also the time when people do a lot of grocery shopping, and they are concerned about someone getting hit by this increased traffic. This kind of development is not the kind of thing they want to encourage. �.Mr. Ron Mattson. 7324 Symphony St., stated that if the rezoning request is denied, so�eone could come in and build a large distribution center on this site. Did Cub Foods intend to build a large distribution center on this site? Mr. Hooley stated they could do that, but that was not their intention. Ms. Elizabeth Youngmark. 130 Talmadge Way, stated she was in favor of the new Cub Foods store. She stated Cub Foods was expanding to benefit the people and to make it easier for them to shop. Ms. Schnabel stated it seemed to be the concensus of the people present that they do like Cub Foods and shop there. They would like to encourage Cub to remain in Fridley, but they do not want the store in this location. Mr. Charles Smith, 7301 Jackson St.� asked if the City knew what the volume of traffic was in terms of semi-trailers at the Target Warehouse per day and how that would compare to the Cub Foods operation. He stated that would be i�teresting to think about in terms of traffic and employees. He stated he thought this proposed Cub Foods develop�ent was a real change-about from the type of thing the Planning Commission and City had in mind when they zoned that area south of 73rd to M-2. The Carter-Day and 7arget Warehouse operations are probably more in line with what the City was thinking about. The question was asked from the audience that if this rezoning request was denied, would Cub Foods move out of Fridley? Mr, Nooley stated that if this rezoning request is denied by both the Planning Cormission and City Council, they have two alternative sites that are not in the City of Fridley. MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECDNDED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ZOA N82-OS BY CUB FOOAS. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TNE PUBLIC HEARING CLCISED AT 9:I3 P.y. Mr. Kondrick stated that a lot more traffic will be going by the entrances to Locke Park, so the traffic volume was of co�cern to him. He also thought there was going to be more traffic on 69th because of the new community park across the street. He did not thi�k the traffic signal at 69th would be able to handle that traffic plus the additional traffic generated by the Cub Foods development. From a parks and recreation point of view, he was not in favor of this development in this location.. 6G PLANNING COMMISSIQN MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1962 PAGE 8 Ms. Gabel stated that the traffic study showed that at peak hours, the traffic conditions are at "D" condition now, and she did not find that acceptable. If the conditions are at "D" now, the level will increase with the development. She stated that i� addition to the "D" traffic conditions, she also saw this as a spot rezoning which she has always been opposed to in the City. She stated the City has a Comprehensive Plan, and she did not believe this developme�t fit into that plan at all. In the Comprehensive Plan, the City has a comnitment to the .Center City �rea and they need ta see that developed. By a7lowing this develop- ment, they would be jeopardizing their Center City project, and she did not think it was in the City's best interest to do that. Mr. Saba stated he agreed with Ms. Gabel. Ne was also concerned about the traffic. He stated he thought Cub Foods was a great operation, and he would like to see them locate somewhere in Fridley, but this particular location was just not suitable in terms of the residential area. Ms, van Dan stated she was speaking as a representative of the Human Resources Cocmission. Sfie had grave concerns. because she did not feel this development was in the best interest of the residents. She did fee] it was important they have high tax return industries in the community, but she also felt they should consider the wishes of the neighborhood. She had great concerns about the traffic pattern. and she was concerned about how this development would affe�t the utili- zatio� of the new community park and the bike trail. Mr. Oquist stated he was concerned about strip or spot zoning and the traffic. He was not sure the traffic study took into consideration the traffic that will be generated by the new community park. Ne stated that is going to increase the traffic flow at 69th and 73rd and will create a real problem. Mr. Boardman stated there are some concerns from Staff's ooint of view. This is and has always been zoned industrial. They are concerned about creating 73rd as a major focal point compared to University and Mississippi. University and Mississippi has had substantial city financial commitment. The HRA is involved in trying ta develop the Center City as a commercial retail focal point for the City. Staff feels there could be some potential problems by shifting that focal point to 73rd. Ms. Schnabel stated she would concur with that. It bothered her that they would be taking the focus of the business community from a comnitanent that was already made to Mississippi and University and shifting it north to 73rd and University. She would be afraid of the long range affects on the Center City area which the City has made a commitment to. 1►lD2'ION BY MR. OQUIST� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECOMM£ND TD CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF REZONING REQiJEST� 20A #82-OS� BY CUB FOODS TO REZONE FRQM M-2 (HEAVY INIXISTRIAL AREAS) TO C-2S (GENERAL SHOPPING AREAS)� TRACT B� RECISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 78� TO ALLOW TXE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RETAIL SHOPPINC AREA, THE SAJ�lE �EING d50 - 73RD AVENUE N.E.� EASED ON 2HE REASONS DISCUSSED ABOVE. SH PLANNING COMMISSION MEEYING. SEPT�MBER 15 �1982 PAGE 9 UPO�N A VOSCE VOTE, 1lLL VOTING AYE, CXAZRWONAN SCXNABEL LtECLARED T�fE J�lOTION GRRIED il1VANIMOUSLY. ' Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to the City Council on October 25. She thanked everyone in the audience for coming to the meeting. Chairwoman Schnabel declared a ten-minute recess at 9:27 p.m. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: RE UEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP �$2-09. b 1�E er ect�on . ,,, o a ow an over ea roof on a woo rame, approximately 30' by 50' on the east end of an existing building, for a display area for fresh produce, located on Lot l, Block 1, East Ranch Estates, the same being 7620 University Avenue N.E. XOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY MS. GABEL� TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP M82-09 BY ROBERT SCHROER. UPON A YDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CKAIRWOJHAN SCtlNABEL DECLARED Ti1E PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 9:39 P.JN. � Mr. Boardman stated right now this is classified as a tent area, and Mr. Schroer did get a temporary special use permit for the outside tent for the produce. 7his was done by the City Council on September 13 to allow Mr. Schroer to go ahead with his produce sale. In the process, Mr. Schroer is submitting an appli- cation for a permanent location for the special use of an outside display area. Mr. Boardman stated a letter was sent to Mr. Schroer on July 14, 1982, identify- ing items that are in non-compliance with City Code. These issues are ones of concern for the special use permit. Mr. Schroer stated the use of this display area would be strictly seasonal-- May 1- Oct. 1. One of the reasons for doing this is because people like the outdoor market, and he may even open it up to some farmers. . . . ,. MOTION BY MR. KONDRICK� SECONDED BY MR. SABA� TO CIASE 1"HE PUBLIC HEARING ON SP N82-09 BY ROBERT SCirROER. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE PUBLIC XEARiNG CLOSED AT 10:00 P.M. Mr. Oquist stated he did not see anything wrong with this request. Mr. Boardman stated there are a lot of traffic problems and confusion in that area, and they are tryi�g to eliminate that confusion and have a more orderly flow of traffic in that area. There are some things in the property itself that can be done to assist with those traffic prob]ems. Ms. Schnabel suggested that Mr. Schroer and Mr. Boardman sit down and work out these problems. �� PIANNING COMMISSION MEETING� SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 PAGE 10 XOTION 8Y IKR. KONARICK� SBCOdVDED BY J�2. SABA, TD RECOXMEND TO CITY C�DUNCIL 11PPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST� SP N8?-09, BY ROBERT SCBItDER: PER S�CTION ?05.10.2� 3� O� TO ALLOW AN OVERXEAD ROOF ON A WOOD FRAAtE� APPROXIMATELY 30' BY 50� ON THE EAST END OF AN EXISTING BUILDING FOR A DISPZAY AREA FOR FRESH PRODUCE, LO�CATED ON LOT I� BIACK 1� BAST RANCX ESTATES� THE SANE BEING 7620 UNZVERSITY AVENUE N.�. •UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY. 3. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S._�i82-0_6, BY THE KUN2 OIL COMPANY: Split off arce B ying sout er y of a ine para e with and distant 197.0 feet north of, as measured at a right angle ta. the South line of said Lot 18). from Parcel A. both in Lot 18, Auditor's Subdivision No. 77, the same being 7355 and 7365 East River Road. Mr. Boardman stated the proposal is to split off Parcel B from Parcel A. One of the stipulations would be a park fee. A park fee is required as part of a lot split. The park fee would be a635.40. Staff would alsa recormend two other stipulations: (1) a 45 ft. easement off East River Road for road right-of-way on Parcel A and 6 to allow for future expansion of East River Road; and (2) a 10 ft. drainage easement on the north side of Parcel A. Mr. John Crouch stated he was representing Kunz Oil Company. He stated it seemed to him that it should be the County that insists upon the easement and not the City. The County has the power of eminent domain, and the County has the obli9ation under the law to pay for private property when they take it. He stated their request to divide this parcel of land. 1.86 acres, clearly undeveloped, clearly not producing the real estate tax revenue it can for the school district, the city, and the county, was a very simple request. He frankly thought the City had no right or power to take 45 ft. of this property at this time, but that was for the City's legal staff to advise them. He knew that under the statutes and the case law, the City could take the park dedication fee and the utility easement around the perimeter of the property, and he would not object to those stipulations. But, in talking about the 45 ft., let the County condemn it and then the County can pay for that land. He thought to take 45 ft. of this property was unlawful, and he would not agree with that stipulation. JNOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF I.OT SPLIT REQUEST� L.S. �82-06, BY TXE KUNZ OIL COMPANY� TO SPLIT OFF PARCEL B (LYINC SOUTHERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL WITB AND DISTANT 197.0 FEET NORTII OF� AS 1NEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE TO� TXE SOUTA LINE OF SAID LOT 18)� FROM PARCEL A� BOTX IN LOT 18� AUDYTOR�S SUBDIVISION NO. 77� TXE SAME BEING 7355 AND 7365 EAST RNER ROAD� WITH THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS: I. TXERE BE A PARK DEDIC�'ION FEE OF $633.40 2. A 10 FT. DRAINAGE EASEMEN7' BE RETAINED ON TXE NORTIY SIDE OF PARCEL A UPON A YOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAZRWOMAN SCHNABEL D£CLARED TXE MOTIO.V CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 �� PAGE 11 4. .RECEIVE AUGUST 12, 1982, HOUSING � REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY�MIN�TES: lIDTION BY P1R. SABA, SECONDED BY !!S. GABEL, TO RECEIVE THE AUGUST I?� I982, iIOUSING i REDEVELOPMENT AUTXORITY MINUTES. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY£, GiAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TiIE MOTION ' •CARRIED UNANIAlDUSLY. 5. RECEIVE AUGUST 27, 1982, HOUSING b REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPEC. MTG. MINUTES: JNOTION BY J�II2. OQUIST, SECONDED BY lIS. VAN L�1N, TO RECENE THE AUGUST ?i� 1982� SPECIAL HOUSING & REDEVELOPJyENT AUTHORITY PlINDTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MQTION CARRIED UNANIMO(JSLY. 6. RECEIVE AUGUST 24, 1982, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL� SECONDED PY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECENE TNE AUGUST 24, 198Z, APPEALS COMMISSION NINUTES. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANINOUSLY. HOTION BY HS. VAN DAN� SECONDED BY 1�JR. KONDRICKi TO RECENE A MEMO DATED AUGUST 31, 198?, FROM JONN FLORA TO GUS DOTY REGARDING TNE VARIANCE REQUEST BY GUS DOTY. UPON A VOICE VOT'E, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: lfOTIDN BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BY XS. GABEL, TO A ATOURN THE lNEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE SEPTEMBER 15� 2982� PLANNING CDMMISSIDN 1NEETZNG ADJOURNED AT 11:1Z P.1�l. Respectfully submitted, .. �GL� y Saba Recording Secretary �+a e�t� FA DATE FROM SUBJECT C?iREGTORATE OF Pt3BLiC WORKS September 22, 1982 e_pw John G. Fl ora C1JB Foods Rezoning TO � � MEMORANDUM ACTIONI INFO• The rezoning request by CUB Foods ta rezone the 17.2 Acre parcel South af 73rd and East of University Avenue was heard by the Planning Comnission on September 15, 1982. After considerable aublic comment and discussion of the CUB proposal the Planning Commission recommended denial of the action based upon:.. 1. Incompatibility with the Comprehensive Plan; 2. Spot rezoning ; and 3. Neighborhood traffic concerns. CUB Foods' option to purchase the property is contingent upon the City rezoning. �We are in the procesz of obtaining soil information on the parcel of land North of 81st and West of University Avenue .) Accordingly they are desiring to obtain an approval or disapproval in order to expedite their plans. If the City Council feels that the 73rd site should not be rezoned, it may be more expedient to deny the action at this time rather than delay the decision for another month. . JGFJmc � � . ��.� .- . � � :, ��, � � «.,� . ,Z y ;� ssoo � �; 1 � . ; . �` ' , � � .2 �._ , � . � � �_=_�� , .� � - �.ri..'. � 1 � 1� - � � ' � � -2 j�..�. ... '� . � - � riM �.� . _ '.� � 1• , `. .l jl , ' . r-• • �� .� _ � � � M,Z , .� �� ;'� .: i� � �� • ' � �� + t • � , � �. ,� � =� , �.. , � � � ... '�.�« K... .s+s� .� r w�+or. � , �� G� ..�. � � .� �� , • � I t� r ��i �. �s � �� ie� . _' . j' - • ` �1 . r - � . Y � � �1-l� t�-! coe�.n�� cw. s. . i � . . . • .. , ' � ory �t R ' � . ` :4RtIM/ i' : ' • �.R . �!� • ,' , . � � �. f� r , . - 1: _ . : '�� • � �. C t� � ' : �. 0 � . !� _. � ►'� �� , � ��- ��- - '' � a �; • • �1i_ � �f�11 �� • ;: � !' �� - ,• �.• �� ;� PLAL► ' � [�s t� �, C . . �� " ' � . � , ; �_� ��' �'� o � �o � s ��. n �•uc �..� t R � ��' urt . ~ TM ��t Y �- . � . R.� � �_� R_� R.� �� R� � �i�s. a�� .�� 6Li � -1 � �,' i � t �� r � • :� TM[ 1Mrr[fOt� T�ar�r[• .� �_ • •��' : . ..� � . »- � � �_�'•� � ' ri � � ; n � 4� ds P� � � ' 1 � :� ,� �i� � C � � v � � � � � � � a� � � � � cr��'V .� � c'S t✓ � ,. a�j� � r+a eiTv F�� DATE ! FROM SUBJECT p1AECTO:�ATE OF PUBLIC WORKS itert�er 22, 1982 Lot Split lS 82-06 l� MEMO R A N D UM TO ACTION iNfO• Nasim Qureshi, City Manager , The Kunz Oil Company has requested to split their property South of Oak Glen Creek and East of East River Road into two parcels. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the lot split LS 82-06 with two stipulations : 1. Payment of Park Fee ($635.40) 2. Dedication of 10 foot drainage easement (Oak Glen Creek� on the North side of parcel A Future development and improvement of traffic flow along East River Road ca11s for a service drive on the East side from 71st to Osborne Road, except for the properties North of Logan Parkway, there is sufficient ROW for this future improvement. The Planning Commission did not incorporate the 45 foot easement along East River Road for future street and utility or access use. If the City Council desires, we shall obtain the necessary easement along East River Road for future traffic use and improvement. JGF/mc . s. � • � .1 a .� • 1 � _-d � � �! • 0 ��a�i1 �€� '�'p�� s�! � '� �!�[�t� � 1 N ' ; � 1 I { 1 O � . 1 � � `' ` r: ^ W �� Q /r 4� � ,` � _ �j o � � � . � :.�, � •.; :, . �. -�• Z ','%; `cy ,�� ., � _ :,�,. / `QQ� 5y 5� �`y /. L. S.#�82-06 Kunz Oi 1 Co. 0 Q �i " �r J O _ _ � R�vER . �.`. ; ��i �� • ' O I �� --= —�,,.,_, �� GC 6 �! 41 L.S. #82-06 42 6 � ' Kunz Oil Co. � �,, ... --- - � - � -- - -- - . ____._ . - __ -- ------ -- ---------- _. - - - - � Narlh /ine c�^lot IQ, Revised Audifor�s Subdi✓;sion No.17. ''`' EAST . e --190.35 — --� � � � ��: :..� � . � � aC � 4 .� � ccQ ��: ::� d �: �� -.� � -: ' :: r':; .:: ' v+ ':; f?.`�;�.. , C •.� �. i . � � ;��;: co � � �� : ��y� •�� `u�� '� � 3Q c� ��a � ', ; �C . ,� , � �� :i `� � ';,�.,;'�, ;i ' '� _ �o :�a;�; :q.1.. ' 1. :� �� •��:I � W % � O ' ` � ;• �V � Qi :: � o� �:: I :;; ' �'�'i! - •y �.Y � �" � . . v I« M f^f ,� . - . �. PARCEI A AREA � 0•86 AC. 199. S1 WfS%' ,t PARCEt 8 ARfA =1.00 AC. t �To�� ga�cK gu��o►NG � o ,� - o a++ o � . : � 0 0 O^s � -.. , �o' 0 9�� 0 C �1 �, � � L �, e s �: � M ;a . C� 1 „� � • Q O ��[1,.. •O ^ _ ' J O � ;$ t Q N �= r � N � � O Q x . 245.32 --� ' - � wfsr ;. ( ��'$oulh %ne on (o/ l8, Rtvi sed Fludi/or's Subdivirion f �� 4�1 S .. �� Sca lr 1 � rst c�Tr os �IRECTORATE OF puB��c �voRKs DATE Se tember 22, 1982 FR01�1 O.P.W, ohn G. Flora SUB.lECT Vari ance Request - 1299 Mi ssi ssi ppi St. i,asim C� MEMO R A N DUM TO ACTION 1NF0• shi, City Manager The Appeals Comnission heard the variance request for 1299 Mississippi Street to reduce the lot area from 20,000 square feet to 13,80D and lot width from 160 feet to 83 in order to construct the office building on the corner of Mississippi and Old Central. The Appeals Commission recorrunended approval with the stipulation that a 15 foot street bikeway/walkway easement be provided along Mississippi Street. The Planning Camnission concurred with the Appeals Comnission. Recommend the City Council approve the variance request with the 15 foot easement stipulation. JGF/mc _ �.� i 6A Appeals Corm�isston !leeting -�lu9ust 24, 1982 Paae 9 t�lOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded 6y Nrs. & rou, to close lic Aeart�g, UPpN A 0►�ICE YOTE. ALL Y07IN6 AYE, CHAIRPERSON 6ABEL DEC THE Pt16LIC HEARING C�OSED AT 9:20 P.1l. I�TION by M�. P1eme1, seconded by M. 6erou, to table this �aatter �rntil the petitio�e� requests tt 6e brought back to Appeals Corflmission. UPON A YpICE YOTE. ALL . 110TING AYE. CHAIRPERS�N GA DECLARED THE.MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOlfSLY. (The reasons for this being that th are too many leg�l roblems involved here whtch prevents the Appeals Corm�is n from taking any action�. 4. YARiAr�CE RE UEST PuRSUANT TO Ct�AP7ER 205 OF TNE FRiDLEY CITY CODE. TO �DUCE�HE RE�UIREJ l0T SIIE FROM 20,000 S�UARE fEE��`0�1��b S�U� �EET�R�HE L07 W1D N ROM-'f�0`SQU�RE FE�i��S3 S UAIt� �EE'f�ALT6iT THE�ONSTRUCTION OF%1�d��' T�Y �8`FO�T�F�1�E�B1T�`L��Tf�, 1�CAT�O-� �T�. �L�CK�, ERCO S DD1 N� NE�IS t1��BE �� —1399 M]SSISSIP�ET K:�. equest y av� . ram�ber ;�1�39�4v`enu`e?��1T� ?�ew`��g to` n;� �1N�a5i 12) MOTION by Mrs. Gerou, seconded 6y Mr. PTemel. to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE YOTE, ALL YOTING AYE. CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEM AT 9:25 P.M. Chairperson Gabe1 read the Staff Report: •� 7�M STAPF RP.F'ORT . izs9 r�.��i�i st..r�t r.s. ,: '�•.. 7�• ;. :� � �• . �a 6ection 205.102, 1, requires a lot �rea of not Iess than 20.000 equare feet for one main building, houever, if the lot Width for a Iot is a minimxm of 160 feet, the lot area requlrement of 20,000 is �ivea �,a �o �i� �ot a�� is requi�ed. A�blic purpose se=ved by this requirement is to avoid the condition of overcra.�dirg of a ooR�ercial r�eighboct�o�od. Y- ar v�.�- � - . 7fiis pcoperty is properly �one� for use ar� plotte8 but �auld not be able to build urx3er thi.s condition.' C. 1�M]2�I SrRAT1vE SrAFF RL�rZPits This lot Was platted ani! zoned prior to the i+rea ana fco�tage requirenents of the Zoning Code. Since this proposed building a�rd use r�eea no other va rtances, ve see no obvious reasm for denial of the reguest. We ?�ever c3o recommend that the petitioner be requirea to dedicate a 15 foot easement along the south (MSississippi Street� for future 6treet aidening and bike�►ayJr�alkxay oonstruction. �• � 6R A�veal s Corarnisston �leetinq. - Au9ust 24, 1982 Pa9e 10 !!r. Clark showed the Commtssion the proposed pl�ns and Mr. Kramber explained ihat he wisfied to 6ui1d an office butlding for his thiropractic practice and wants Lo rent the 6asement. Ne stated all the setbacks snd greenery witl be to code and Ae Mill only need 10 parking spots. Ms. 6abe1 asked �bout the other lots in the area that are for sale. �lr. iramber said they are being sold. Ms. 6abe1 asked tf they are the same size and he stated yes and Nr. P1eme1 asked if this Mas all tommercial and hr. C1ark stated they are C-2. Mr. Kramber said tt will be a ve�y nice lcoking building, the basement Mill have plenty of windows, 28 Dy 44 square feet. Ne said he does not have a renter for the 6asement yet. He stated the 6uta ding wili be tompati6le wttf� the otfier 6uildings in the area. stucco rith cedar trim, it witl fit rtght into the neighborhood. His �nother has tatked to the people at Sandee's and they have no o6jecttons to these plans as these lots have been vacant tor so tcng. He stated the building Mill be "house height" and he has no problems with the City witF the landscaping. Mrs. Mech. 1315-66th Street N.E., asked about parking. Mr. Kramber exPlained that parking is no problem and getting in and out will De no problem and he pointed out that the lots are unbuildable without a variance. Ms. Gabel asked when he Moutd start construction. Mr. Krambe� satd tn October, that he is trying to get out of a lease right now. fie witl close on the land on September 15th and wants to be in by Ch�istmas. Ms. Gabel asked tf he understood the sidewalk easement and he stated he did and asked if that would cause fiim any problems. Mr. Clark said it woutdn't and that the county would possi6ly want the 15 feet and to make sure the shrubbery is planted off that. • MOTION by Mrs. Gerou, seconded by Mr. P1eme1, to close the publtc heartng. UPON A YOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING A1fE, G!lAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC NEARING LLOSEfl A'f 9:40 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, that the Appeals Commission �ecommend to the City Council, through the Planning Lommission. approval of t�e request to reduce the required lot size from 20,000 square feet to 13,800 square feet or the ]ot Nidth from 160 square feet to 83 square teet to a11ow the construction of a 44 fo�t 6y 28 foot office building, located on Lot 5, Btock 1. Erco's Addition. the same 6eing 1299 Mississippe Street, N.E., Fridley, Minnesota. 55432, with the stiPulation that a 15 foot easement shall 6e dedicated along the south (Mississippi Streety for future street widening and bike-way/walkway tonstruction. (The Commission felt tf�is was a reasona6le request as you cannot 6uild on these lots witF►out a vartance and they would like to see something happening in this area). S. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUAMT TO CHAPTER 205 OF TNE FRIDLEY CITY CODE. TO - - �.Y � _ - - ..--�r.. �EJtfCE iHE FROyT YARD SETBACK FROM 7Nt Rt u1Ktu �� r�ti �u sy rt��,-�u ALLOt��HE COr�STRUCTION 0 OOT�r—l�f O� SU��ORCH A�ao`G��EN 'F�usE,`I�ZA`iE� �N 1�T , c. rri DiTIiSN,`�T�� 31��'�T1�� 1315 66fh venue N.�.�equest by,�r-�''�rs- .l�echT31� 66t��ue N.E.� MOTION �y l�r. Plemel, seconded 6y . Gerou, to open the publiG hearing. UPON A YOICE VOTE, ALL VQTING AYE, C PERSON GABEL OECALRED SHE DUSLIC HEARING OPEH AT 9:42 P.M. — Chairperson Gabel � the Staff Report: - - ---. . ..�- . . � t� . 1� t� �.. � t : _ .. _... .� --,� --- -- -• • - 1299 Mississippi 6 $ . . � �� •� ��ip � �ts R� � ��'#�it b :� 1�4� �i�� N � � 1�: � v �• � ,o �[w � . _♦ V ` 1 � e �-- � A1Nf10� Jl3S:Nrb ---- •------- � =ii � , ( n , r '00� rp+o�ls �� i �' _ r: 7■ as .-��, •.�w — �� , . t' s rii �s�ioow ' •� t ��bi�73j� �� ` , i� * •��•'�•i..:.•• � ..�..•��.�.`r�e. j �� i ' 'r ! 'Y ��1Wr� ; T • �� ♦.�Q.?i -�.�r ��-�•rl.��.�'.'�. � _ � 1 � I � . . . . _ � . � • � � � : i • . • , _ ,�,,, ; � • 6;'i ic.:.i,� ,�. "f "��' �' , _ NpMr __ - a • 1 ■ 7i •�pn � i � �+" Y . � \ �/ � ' � !h, ' �. � ��• . w� � •.��•;.�.�.�,1 L , I a . ,_.Si ; '��• ��¢{' /L /��`' t:t•.C� :.t:z:i: :2�-� i • � •7r a� Y�aw � Ii;a • -, Z �-...�._:LJ..� , . ��r, �' �' _ � �;; - _ `` �`.�'� �! +$� �. 1- � � i ._ �_�r jI M i • � �i -�Jr �.n, -_-�—l� � L„1.�' � �� i i� .�! s,�.►�� ..�.. _ .�_ _ .. �� ti � , �. ' t=.t2 • . ,� ` � ,. << •-- i 1 �� , ` , � , _ �; o�., . . _ � [ -�r � � _ �.. !'j,l' , irY-Yk3 4 (—� _♦ � i ";O ± �f _ f � � � t� ` t y � � Y __,�, � 'w ��, ; 1 � � i ^..'--••. �• , a . .��' i' ; i ; _ . �� ''t" •'��,� � . 1 1� �+ �u— . i� t� � r , �_ • ij= j � � ; M ="� �-- • �� .' oc�. �.:i�.«i uss. — _ ..,.�� . `�wlisa r+. � �...�. � �; + � o .i 1 � , �� N• �_ r' 0 1 1 r� i1� ao '�e' �•i�•�� '1"` _��t. i� i_ i• ��. .o� i ��, y��'i+ fJ (�'�i��;v��s� i3 l ��i � t >�. �. ( Z : -[ • ' � 0 � g � _ :. � � / ZI 1 t�-... � � � E'' i` "i ,t `1 '; •� ` � �. _" '-;3 . t Z r ' � y�4�`'�e ��' _" � } � i : �.'` 't�. Q� `� y ;. : '� � ` , ' �' � � � � ..� , � • � .�. f Is � � sar�u � ,� Q ' Z�: f I • � +�� j � � •!. s � � !� $�� ; `�*• �- t{ W� t''1� �1• ' � � � d + � �.`.1 3it2�z [�� q ^r-r � � . ;� }• 4�� a.� � �ps i l � _ �-_� �'! � �"t •`.a� r'�:�,o�; `,,i�, i �Il;�.. -�f-i��t'��- -��n� --�- 1 J�� •J � L� %% i � f I �� '� = 1 .w i ,t, � iK , > • ; • -; �- �.�.:. , a �-► Tr� c1 t'� � v o r+ �� .K711 �- �w_ ,;+;��' + +i��-' Z< . �� • • • r � i 7��j��•.- I _ :..�- Y'�' - w--� � ' � „r'' ' . . - . .L...._ i� ' ' s os�ai �:�iM IN 71NI1111�71�1i*,�: •' :• ..---._• . . . - i-:;�� _- _�_fi � - - �w�+r�_�_.7 �' VtAiO'Y�� . � i . `� + t ' / r ! � -..:�-� �� :i •� � � � -=ovv Np�3s'.� M3►A�ooae - �- .w� i t'. i • j �'�'� t= + ' ' s-- } . . j � i , ts� ivi . 'j '��1� s ._,.. • ` � � � ' ,� ! ` � �- .� . ,o. r . : � � s �� t`' `� � ` � .''� • _ " � • ��. , � ra'' � R�l � ?'O� ' aa e ` t : � f e j 3i'� ��`r �'` �•�{.��s1 � i �'Y.�/�t r llo- s-�a��o i{ rl {V . • .�S . \ � - --' � .�... � � J� , : �," '� r� _ ' � �'-' „� 1+ � '�• �` ''�� = � i i ' ` r �- � �DO� � 44�w,'�' p:r `• �: � � ' � '�P�t v �� '�v ..'i� . �'.�'�-�-�: =1fi_ * }o�; ,. 1 _� ! ,. •,•�' � '•�".•:�t�- •�.: �:., �� 'o°''�� ±; � �� ' � ' '� : et 1 �� ' i � ��'•' ' o `� L •u. »... f • 1 ; ��..! � �r �.5�.�. r - �...-,r+y �+ � �` ' �� I'� ,� i� �� '. t' �� • +�. J � • • f � \ �`: , � •oor a�c r�t w�r�►�roo�r� � � � �- � � 67 , • � 1.299 Mississippi � — - " ' " —*+ . � � � N � ` f . ZO � t , �. 1 = ' _'' . . . _ � , � � . i � �� ; 1 ` , _ , � r �q . . � �. . � ��` � � � "�� - . _ �� , • � i � - N , � � �. � � i ! � _ � � s �- �� , � ,+ .. � � -� , � l, �•� � � = � :''' �. ={ r.. �► �r. , � ; J °� -- . ..., �: .,, : ,. ' t ;i` { �, , �� `� i � ��.� � `i y � �. � (' � � - . o � ; . . � ;. ` r�, = ' . � �� . .r_ - �� . • � � � � i� � _ . � < , . : � -- -.� . . � _ a,��, � � . . �.,�, _ . ( - � , � .. � � � as' � • . � ' r. --� - . � • � ` � --, ' -- . . . G��1.�"�.t.. �� :�- - - , . � MYM �_� a� 11 :�� !1 8 li! O R 1�1 H D O 1! ►• r� � • u• a. :� « i��i?c;a- '.� ��:f . I J/�. � ��.� .� ��' IJ V' : 11: J�1 '��P�� :r� :A }• �� ?'1' • �. L1ATF+i SEPI.*Fi�F�t 22 / 198� Qn Septenber 21, 1982, the Appeals Cor�miission on a 4-0 vote approved the follawing varianves for construction of a 4-unit apartment complex at the above locatiaci: 1. Reduoe the required Iot area fran 15,000 square to 13,250 square feet, 2. Reduoe the required front yard setback fran 35 feet to 20 feet, 3. Reduoe the requirecl side yard, corner lot, setback from 35 feet to 25 feet� . 4. Reduoe the required regular side yard setback fram 15 feet to 10 feet, and 5. Reduoe the required rear yard setback fran 35 feet to 30 feet. This item was tabled by the Appeals Commission at their August 24, 1982 meetirig with the request for Qzris Zelevarov, the petitioner, to work wfth City Staff on different plans or ic3eas for this Iot because of t-he site desic� and the cZevelopers desire to oontruct quality tmits. Numerous meetings were held with Mr. Zele�varav, the neighbarhooc� and with the City Staff and Pat Gabel, Chairperson of the Appeals Catm�ission, to work out a feasible solution to the situation. 'Ihe enclosed plan is the most feasible solution the staff, Mr. 2elevarov, the neighborhooa and the Appeals Ca�umission oould agree upon. �he Appeals Cai�anission also made the follawing stipulations on the variance request: 1. Dedicate an ease�nent to the City for the existing storm sewer along the east property line of 6471 Riverview Terraoe, 2. Reoord a joint driveway agreanent for the common driveway between 6471 Riverview �erraoe and 160 Mississippi Plaoe, 3. Install a 6 foot privacy fence along the south property of both properties denoted in �2 above; the fence to be only 4 feet from the edge of Riverview 2�errace and running 35 feet east, to pravide for line-of-sight visibility, and 4. Landscape plan to be approved by the City. Si.noe there has been oonsiderable delays in this item reaching the Council, and the petitioner would like to o�nstruct this year, suggest the Council act on this request at tiieir September 27, 1982 meetinq. � Zhank yout I�I/bd �!!0/26/7 6U 6V CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, SEPTEMBER 21, 1982 CALI TO ORDER: Chai.rperson 6abel called the September 21, 1982, Appeals Cortmission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Patritia Gabel, �im Plemel. Alex 8arna. Uonald 8etzold Jean Gerou OTHERS PRESEN7: Kent Hill. City of Fridley Chris'Zelevarov, 160 Mississippi Place Edward fragale, 6480 Riverview Terrace JoAnn C. Leidal, 160 Mississippi Place A. 8. Hitzemann, 160 Mississippe Place Nalter Luchow, 161 - 64-� Way N.E. Mary Ellen Luchow, 161 - 62� Nay N.E. Lois Foster, 6441 Riverview 7errace Fred Foster, 6441 Riverview Terrace Keith Boulais, 7753 Beech Street N.E. Nels Johnson, 6456 Riverview Terrace Rick Morkrid , 6461 Riverview Terrace Jack Nugent, Far View Sign Company Jack Laurence, SignCrafters APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 24, 1982: MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, to approve the minutes of August 24, 982 Appeals Commission, as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON GASEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. �• CONTINUED: VAf�'LANCE P.EQUESTS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY _ ARE FEET T 20 FEET; R UCE THE RE E YARD SET T OWEILING E THE REQUIRED LOT 13�250 SQUARE FEE DUCE TNE SIDE YARD R YARD SETSACK FRO ACK FROM 15 FEET T� ON PART OF LOT 13, N OF RIVERVIEW 7ER s ietevarov, ZE FOR A FOUR-UN1T DWELLING F REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TBACK ON A CORNER LOT FROM 35 5 FEET TO 30 FEET; ANO REDUCE 0 FEET, TO ALLOW TNE CONSTRUG DITOR'S SUBOIVISION NO^ 23, A E AS PLATTED IN JOHNSON'S RIV , TNE SAME BEING 6411_ RIVERVIEW TERRACE N.E. (Ke ssissippi Place N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55 2). ADD qust MOTION by Mr. Sarna, seconded by Mr. Plemel, to remove this item from the table. UPON A VOICE YOTE, ALL YOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEt DECLARED THE M07ION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. - MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLAREO THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:40 P.M. 6N A�peals Coromission Fleeting - September 21, 1982 Page 2 Chairperson 6abe1 Read the Staff Report: ADMIIiISTRA7IYE STAFF REPORT _ 6471 Rivervis� Tsr��ce N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPt)SE SERVED SY RE0112REMEfiT: Section 205.073� A2. requires a■iniaum lot •res of 15,000 squers tsst ptue 1�000 �que�s iest pe� dwellin� unit ove� 4 in nuwbsr. Publlc purpose served by this �equirement t� to evoid the condition of overcrowdin8 of s �esidantial �eighharhood and to alloK sufficient ersa for off-straet psrklnD end avoidinp sn excess burden on the existing water and eeMer 6ervicss. Section 205.073, 4A. requires a oinia+ua� front Ys�d 6etbeck of 35 fsst. Public purpose ssrved by this �equtren►ent t� to provide desired tront yerd specs to ba used for D�een srees on sccess and to edd to tfie sttrectsbillty oi s mu[tipls tons. Section 205.073, 46, /3. �equires s �ninimum side yerd oi 35 feet xhere s side yerd ebuts the 6treet eide of s corner lot. Pubtic purpose served by thic requirement is to meintsin sdequete cide ya�d setbecke end eesthetio open aree6 eround �nultlpls dNellinps. Sectlon 205.073, 4C, �equires s ceer ysrd depth af not less then 25 peresnt ot tha lot depth, with not less then 25 feeL pera�itted or more then 40 feat �equirsd. Public purpose served by Lhi6 �equirement is to meintein edequete open specs e�ound multipla d�ellt�gs tor eesthetic end firo fi8htin�. Section 205.073, 48� H. �equ��es a side ys�d ot nct tess ths� 15 feat. Publlc purpose served by this requirement is to provide foc edequeta ope� erees (green divider aressi eround multiple dweltings to meintain cleer access for tire fighting a�d to �educe ccnflagretion of firs. B. STATED 1tARDSHIP: "Additionel unite necessa�y to meke this a feeeible project. Lend petterns sre Lhe resutt of road end other residentiel deve[opment. In edditio�. powec line to the south forces building to be shifted to the front of the Lot." C. ADMINISTRATIVE S7AFF REVIE�1: Stsff hes met xith ths petitione� severel times. ?he heerin� notice Ma� purpcsely worded to 9tve the Board the optton of moving the buitdin8 up to b feet in either the norLh-souLfi or east-r�est di�ecttone. we recomme�d thet ths Boerd conside� epprovin8 the �equested verience 6� thet 1f built, the buitdin� be loceted as far no�th t20 feet from the north line) end es fer M86L t25 fest trom property tinei @e tosthe`southhand8betrreenethexstructuce sndctheeexisttn�� structu�e end the ha eto�m 68w8P atong the eest ti��. 6X A��ea1 s Cortmi sston Meetinq,— Septerober 21, 1982 Page 3 If ths variancas ��e app�orsd, ths pattttonse hsc s8rsad to prant �n •acs�asnt tor ths sxisLinp stors sews� •nd he �ilt •ttsch a drtveway asseMent ta tfis •xistiny fou rplex hs presently owns �d,jacant to �nd •sst ot this site for sccess to this p�opossd 4-pl�x. . Atso� ths propsrty is p�ops�ty taned snd thsr• srs sxisting 4-ptsxss to ths north �nd sast of this props�ty. Ths lots to the �re�t snd soutfi •r� •xistinp sinpts Esmily dwetlinps. ' Sincs this item wes Lsst considsred (August 24, 1882 oeetin8i Chslrpereon Gebsl hes zpent considerebls tloe aestin� �ith the nei�hbors to po over ths proJsct and ths options avallebts. � • The pre6ent concen6us ts that 1t: I1i Lhs structure wers �noved five feet furthe� �orth and ilve feet further west� I2i s 6 foot privacy fence wes instslted slon8 ths south [ot Ltns af both the nex snd sxistin8 buiLdings before or st the sems tin►e ss the foundetion i6 to bs constructed, i3) snd edequete lend6capin8 wes implemented, tha forme� nei8hborhood concerns Moutd De put to �est. 7herefore. tt the Boa�d recommends app�ovat� the vaciance app�ovet 6hould bs aith the foltoMing stipulstions: 1. Dedicete an eesement to tha City fo� the extsting 6torm se�e� slong the sa6t property ltns. • - 2. Inetell a privacr tence slonD the south property line ot both the neM sits and the exisLi�� 4-plsx. . 3. Record e Joint driveMer s8reement tor the common drivewer. 4. Lendscepe plsn to be spp�oved by the CitY. Ghairperson Gabel stated that there have been a lot of ineetings with the petitioner regarding his plans for thts property since the last Appeals meeting. She also said she I�as met with the neighbors and that all parties fiave finally reached an amicable agreement regarding tfie structure to be put on this property. Mr. Hill showed the Commission the current plans for the building and Chairperson Gabel invited the neighbors present to come up and review them and to answer any final questions they may have and to make sure these plans were agreeable to the neighbors. Thece was a question regarding the privacy fence and it was agreed to add a stipu- lation to the variance request that the privacy be 6 feet high for 35 feet along the south property line and then the fence may drop to four feet high. Mr. Cochran, 111-642 Way N.E., was present. he stated he was a neighbor that did not receive notice of this matter but said he was in favor of this structure going up. Mr. Fragale, said he lives across the street from the dwelli�g being built and was very much in favor of this dwetling bei�g butit. Mr. Hitzemann, who lives in the existing 4-plex and is a caretaker for Mr. Zelevarov, stated he felt the drainage and driveway plans are fine and that the buiiding will be a big improvement to that tot. Ms. Leidal. who moved from St, touis Park to the existing building, stated that she would like to see this building go up and she likes this area very much. Nels Johnson said he is satisfied with the plans now and thanked the Commission for all their work in getting the neighbors and Mr. Zelevarov to arrive at a compromise. . 6Y Appeals Commission yeeting - September 21, 1982 � Page 4 MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Plemel, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON 6ABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:15 P.M. Mr. Plemel stated that he Mas �ot in favor of this structure the first time it came before_'the Commission 6ut he is now in favor of the cu�rent plans and stipulations and he commended Chatrperson Gabel and the neighbors for arriving at a compromise. Mr. Barna stated t�at he would 6e in favor of t�e variance as it sounds as if the neighbors are now satisfied. Mr. Betzold stated that he thought this was the best solution as t�e alternatives were less desira6le for everybody. Ms. Gabel was also opposed to this structure the first time but she is now in favor with the current Qlans and stated that the neighbors and the Comnission have worked very hard on this and now feels it is a workable situatio�. MOTION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Barna, that the Appeals Commission recommend to the City Council, through the Planning Cammission. approval of the request to reduce the required lot size for a four-unit dwelling from 15,000 square feet to 13,250 square feet; reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet; reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 35 feet to 25 feet; reduce the rear yard setback from 35 feet to 34 feet; and reduce the regular side yard setback from 15 feet to 10 feet. to allow the construction of a 4-unit dwelling on part of Lot 13, . Auditor's Subdivisicn No. 23. along with the vacated portion of Riverview Terrace as platted in Johnson's River Lane Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, the same being 6471 Riverview Terrace N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, with the Stiputations that an easement be dedicated to the City for the existing storm sewer along the east property 1ine; that a 6 foot hiqh privacy fence be installed along-the south ' aproperty line of both the new site and the existing 4-olex and then the fence may drop to 4 feet high 35 feet from Riverview Terrace; that there be recorded a ioint fiighway agreement for comnon drivewa.y; and that the landscape plan be aooroved by the City. UPON A YOICE VOTE, ALL YOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL OECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1■ - ��a�`! '�� ;�:�� g4� i��rf� : :� '� : � i, � a �� , � ` � f.K . - �. O � �� -. �� . , Ma �.-., :. �: � ��. � �� h O_�; , � �-�, t� ''_ VWj � o a �� N �. ` y — � S tS 6Z . _ Yariance b471 Riverview 7errace_. 3/`'a Z O d 0 J �1 �f ?C.� � `f� 1� f,� � s�� . � � �� _- -� .a • ' _•-/' v� � � _ _�� .t -,,,,..�od�s -- _f„ : .: �� --- %SS�W� �_____ _ �� . , .��l � I � �✓',3_� v/ / � . ' � � �- � .� ' 1 . � / �. . . . � • �� I •� � •� t' .�� • 1 . � .w�+s, .�� _ �. - ��- �� • ' ..,��.� ' •. . � `••y � - - � • � � ` '• ♦ v �- ��i �� _ y ,.r• � �, � . � � : -i�� Q <: • � � •1 t � '• - ► ` ' - .Z:. �" ~j .�t_ , O • . � ••• . s. - • _ s .�_ �� - ' . �i4�,J F�.ivA�v'IPW Y � , {,J fl� • � _ � . � •. • .�� • , � ' . t .�� :::,. i. • . �.f: - �, . — . • _ . . 1' •' � ' T _ '. T � . _ , � -- .�. +. ' r � � �� ` • " . . � . - .xt- o�Yy�r.ak � : .- , _. • _ ._� , .- _. , . . . , 1 `.� � � ; � � f , •�.iT.. • '1 � .�•' . , �� ' . � ' �-. ' ' � . . ; ' J � '� . . � �i' � _ , ' � r" .. . •' , , ~ • eY=,. 0�4C . � �' � ,lfi �M(� i�' Ca• :� . . r,� �,e .'ia� � � . ,} '" "' ,.• �_ �� -- -- � . -.,� r'��,. . / i � . . ._ � i , �S.ta�4.,c,.` _ tib s f t ' `( : � � � i � . ,_ y � 1 ip601tN �fiOLfCz- - =-3 ��. . �, `• • • /' 0 � t T, � I, � � �f- FM� 1��• �•. ` I `� � . • , • i; • t . ' , iy '. J' . . •�\ �. �! •Y ' '� . ' . , . � �.l�• !' ♦ ' �: - ..+ � �k: ' _� . : �� . � �,�� ;*�.r , ,.i,. , �:� , .� _ ". ' �.' � �c t 4�`{' 4 '�se s �� / • ' , -�,' � �4 b�u� T � • _ia lW _ I . � # blua.. � � - - . . �'� � �! P��'f's.a6.� - �� ►T�csa. . C', . .. f . . . . j � i' � , . . _;l,lqtP t�' - - ��=,� "�G i a,tu1.��.0. . . - • - -�•� �• - ;�.' �+~-'... ' , ; . . _ .i i- � ..� . •y.� �..`' i n � ., �� . � .•:� .ir�r'=-hur�o+� =-�- :� r -,: . ' `'� . • ' J ' � , . . . ~. ' � � � • _ . ' • � � !�� . "- � 1 ;t�ac.. •y: i �:.Y a,..', `i� �!- �• .� ' . � . •�� a . ',� ' � , r � Y'-o � y � ` � �+.� �•';• .�} � � _ . . . � `� .. _ • . � t_ �. _ - '';4 )' ( . ' 11$�T.,tiir pL�V�.. � {�+�'• .'' �i �V �'Ct�.• , t + � i . • ' .�_ _ � � t1�� {�ti3 `�� • � Z.O � • i � � • _f- . . .;. ' �_ .�� !� � ... . s • � '\ �"_`',,'-. �4 � : f •M �Y. � ti 4 ' . • 1 ' .Ilri � '� _• �rt.�,�I _ l.'T" _ •� � �. . � j. •�' r� � �_ 1' 1 •�y � � � L'.. . . ,• �: . • � � . ,`.` '� � � �� ,J d. � Y ,. • � 'l • w . c :.� � �'r • '�� .. � ~i t � �� • {j ♦ 1 J � . . � � , .�. -�. s� - L � . � • t � +��. CI. ' ,,., '� f r•. .� . � � 1.0� •l - �, . . , : i, -- !-� . = f . � j _ � _ . _ `.:. > -� -~:.. `� 1' `: � � j .� _ ' � •, ' , � � . � . . . _ • t;� , � ' �: _"�-� ,.�'.' `� •1 �� ' ;., �,-'_ .t - _� ; - . . .. ,V ' ' • . • . �p I- _. . _ � , ,. �,. . ' l� : • . ,, o _ •; • C. � . _ ' � _ T � ;��.�...r _ `--'' ' f ` • -- = -- — -� � : . ,�U� � � .� � .,. t�6,�j' _�.� ��v-_ ��=i � � o . :. ' . ... � _ t . . _ :�'� � i,p ` '�`� . . � •� ': .,,�`:.• ` _ :', ��... , . � , , . ;''�. C= _ . c • �'' - . F . r> ? I ' . .. . . 3. �'_ ,� -�� _ � ! , _ ;i�� t-• �• . , � _t r0� . . -. . . , ; .. - � ,: :n,, • .r,'`+'-i_`. . t _ . :�: j � t tiR � K . _ : f _ � _ •v- � ,. • _ _�_j,•� ' � _ a . � _ - � • ' . ' ;, " � ... � 1 _ _ . b�. PFr�um -=;�uv,p . _ .ti _ • ' _ � , � i�uac. ��v - Ta" w� - . e.�r s` -��-�; 'e : � -� i :��- � _ � � , '. _t� c s _ . �:'-- --�� `� • � - : '' � . 't' -" :' � '. . t _� _ , ; _ . _ � . .. _ _ ; .,��+ . _ _ : � - � _ . � : . �, � oo.o ��tL - , ' . .i .. _ ' r= � ..' . f i. `' ��- _ ._ J . • �� 'G��+• � ' • _ ' . y. ' $ fr. tT ' � , .. ` �w � �� -r� � ��`L''�. . � ! ��'.I::9s,}, ..� '� r'�•*• '— , - t � • �i � . r � . �_ {�� . � ' � . . ` . � t�^.. •�`i t I �': � i�� - � " � . ` • . •-� � G . Fti _ , . .* !i+� t .I" � y� . . -.�'.La�� _ - _� .� ` � I t .�_ -..-� .�.�� . . V , -. ,~ _ : ., t '. �+; r. . J t� . d. .x " , � < � � � 4' �►�+ �Qt�' `;�`�� :''� L, PRw ��•.�x� ' A:,,, �; ;-, �. �; _.� � �� ' ^ - �• � .�• i.� ,� - . `.. • 'a i �'�f� r� �f.` �~~, • � " � ... .Y..wr, 'r � � ' . . . � 1� - �1 �r'. .i _ �k�_ ., t. - •s t� r. a, v. � - . .� . : ' - : : 1-Y . �.. r -:i� • t�„rs v' . -a s _ , • - � . �� - � � . • - . . 1 -�p. �• a; .; . - � ',~'' t 'r � 1 • .',' . �f ` _�� ,s-R; s� "�_.�.`: �"' '� . �� ~ 1 -!%�"L # �� _+.-a � + -j''� -�i� �t � .� .- .,�i�� .`. �- ' �` ��:'-'rii .:�°��1 s s '7':x' . ". Z� : S'' oa.}y:` ♦ �,�� C � �'' -•�'. - :�.5^' .�. � ' _. .. ► ' i. � ' ��,~ �,a . _ Y, r..Yi:.��..T � � � .J _ �'.-•�� • . � � i "a � t . ^ c� ";Ei'c. = -.� t' ;AJ,a-t' � -.., �.�� 'i. �-i ' = ''' r f J '' �yt �.� t � � l'4 _ �s � :. �r� '> �„�'� ` • �'�'. . �`�_. ltR � � .P a : _�� ^ a�4 �i+-a. . r�►ir � ' ..1 `� ='t ..y F�t F y. z " ': z t+:;,�-t' �l �+�°,� : R- "`�`: � :.,�''�-+f.: '4-- u �'� �► � j� i a. �•':,(� 4 � 4. �+c : . �'it �„v� � r}.� �! � * _ -,• • , �1 *t i• �� %i-r �`:ti:�.`'.tis �'� � zr !,L'� -' . � r?` +,<`.. ; �! •:y�f''�t�?i'��'{.� : ,., . ' - � y -j�a .'� � .'�. Z ��i. i�, i� +- a i . _ �:'� •.•./ : ' •''� � l��' f ' g' .. �i, . �'� � '�a � ' = pr s f . � s • Yf .e a �. �. .f � -Z' .i�:� �. •��c �� }•►�y�,. 't � � .w b .,�,:y`/: 8' Te,.� tt �.. �P..- �c� � �.� 1'.�i�� ) �t S�` i.'t-.;..�'�' .r i! �' ��T ' f''r�s .1+� �!�~ „?; �. '-+��s r,�fi a��i}�-y.+� ��j� � �if7 �i��'•h \ S.l1f� 4 �. •�`' �`c_ ��`'y'k� �� Z �y � s • •�� i?' t'��I � w T � !� .�''y�• ts `t' .`-a. a '�'�" _. :(.� '�.�`r"a i� � �� 't2'�- ►. ?►.. ti' �' �y,•��I'"� t �� ! ' �T� . �[ - i !'� �•� • .` v�; / , i' . a. . L._ • . .. . . . < �.� _ •' ' �_ .. /-'.' .. . . . i ' , �_ ti� • �E"� r r7'�'l��ai �ii�tf'►�r�31�.��f ��'i�4.� g'��3e��i��ii}��J�'f�l:� t�.'1'Y QF FRIIi� 1rIBI�lORAIiD�li 'lOs NASIM Q�HI� QTY lIANAGI�R i�R�'is �I�TP HII�L, B�I�IIC DLVIIAPI�TP ASSIS'TANP St�.THC.Ts PROPOSID Di,VFIAPN�NP BY SUPER AN�RICA AT 5667 UNIVIIZSITY AVF3�lUE DAZE: SEFt'F�IIt 22, 198�2 On September 21, 1982, Super America submitted plans for the proposed develognent of the proQerty denotec3 above. Super America is requesting the follawing action by the City do�cil: 1. Re-instatenent af SP #77-17, with the pravision of 24 hour operation ra�her than the apprwed 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM hours, 2. Allaw the encroachment onto the frontage road right-of-way for o�nstruction purposes as ap�roved by Council on May 7, 1979, 3. Continue with SAV #79-02 to vacate the frontage road. This item had a public hearing on Ju].y 16, 1979, but no further action was taken by the Cotmcil. 4. Zb honor all agreenents for propetty transactions. City Staff is waiting for a curr�t survey of the property before prooeeding with this iten. I have been in oontact with John Pomaville, contract owner of Motor Valet, the praperty south of this location and he is in favor of this developnent but only if there is no expense to him for any ir�rovenents or alterations brou�t about by this oonstruction. In reviewing the 1982 plan, the following changes from the 1978 plan were found: l. Zhe building is being maved south and is 18 feet 4 inches from the rear property line. 2. �e building is of earth shelter-type oonstruction, 3. 7he east driveway ingress/egress is 40 feet from 57th Avenue, and 4. �io�gasoli.ne p�m� islands are nvw present; only one island was on the 1978 plan. Super America is requesting that the Council consider their request at the Sept�nber 27, 1982 meeting so that vonstruction can proceed during 1982 and not be c7elayed until 1983. �ank youl IQi/bd 4/0/26/8 �� E. LOUIS SCHUETTE P. O. Box 541 Columbus, Indiana 47201 812-372-1126 September 21, 1982 Honorable City Council City of flridley Municipal Building Fridley, MN 55432 Subject: Superamerica Store #4175 � 5 66 7 Un ivers ity Avenue Northea st Fridley, Minnesota Gentlem en : Please accept this letter as our official request to permit our constructing a new 2400 Sq. Ft. Superamerica station/store at the above location per the attached plan. As you are aware, this facility was approved by your body in 1978. It is my understanding that you will only need to reinstate all the permits that were approved then and all we need to do is reapply for a building permit . We would appreciate your reconsidering the one restriction on our hours of operation. The original condition was from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. We would respectfully request your considering a 24 hour operation. It is almost a necessity to be able to derive all possfble revenue to insure a reasonable payoff on our sizeable investment. In your consideration I hope you consider the wide street we will be constructing between our place and the closest neighbor. Sincerely, , E. Louis Schuette for SUPERAMERICA, a Division of Ashland Oil, Inc. ELS/e att cc: John Flora Kent Hill 7A �.. 6 � A6REEHENT SUPERAMERICA STATIONS. INC./CITr OF FRIOLEr TH1S AGREEMENT �aade and entered into this !.lthday of August . 1978, by and between Superamerita Stations, lnc.. a Minnesota torporation, the fee uwners. hereinafter called the "Fee Or+ners', and tAe tity of Fridley, a nunicipal corporation of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "Ci ty" . 1t�REAS. the Fee Owners have petitioneE the tity to approve�5�e�ia1 ' Use Permit SP t77-]7 to allo�+ construction of a Superamerita Station Convenience Store located on lots 27. 28. ?9 and 30. Blotk 4. Hamilton's Addition to Mechanicsville,�the same being 5667 University Avenue NE; all lying in the south half of Section 23. Township 30. Range 24. County of Anoka, State ot Minnesota; and , WFIEREAS. the City finds that approval of the Special Use Permit wilt be in the public interest, aelfare and convenience to the peopte of the City of Fridley if the fee Ormers agree to the items below by parties hereto. ' COt�SIDERATION FOR TN15 116REEMENT sAall be the approvsl of Special Use Pe rtnit SP /77-17. Fee Gmers. thei� successon and assigns do hereby covenant and agree as follons: l. Site devetopnent Mill take place as shown on the attached site plan dated �1/21178. except as herein rtadified, which site plan Mill be part of this a9reement. 2. The service road Mill be constructed as noted on site plan to • plans and specifications prepared by the Fee Owners and submitted to and approved by the City Public Works Department. Escrow a►onies in the amcunt of 51.500 shall be submitteQ by the Fee Owners to the City to cover City expenses associated with revieN of plans and specifications and inspection cf construction. 3_ Strert easemenL %r the senrice rnad on the Fee Owner's pro- perty nould be dedicated t� the City and after proper construction, the tity would accept�the service road and provide for future maintenance. � . � t 7B � -�- AGREEHENT SUPERAMERICA STATIONS. INC./CITY OF FRIDLEY 4. The tity Mill a11a+ use of existing service road along west side of property to be used as driveway and parking area. This driveway and parking area shall be designated a one-way with ingress only onto the site. The four (4) parking stalls noted along the Mest side of the ezisting service road would De deleted. ' 5. Fee Owners will aGcept for future mainteoance the existing ser- ' vice �oad bein9 used as a drive++ay entrancP and parking area. 6. Landscaping, screening and exterior developneht will pe provided as noted on plans rith the tollowing additions: a) Berming will be ptaced on boulevard area along no►th property line. . b) A lawn sprinkliog srste� rill be provided to ensure proper naintenance of landscaped and sodded areas. c) The Fee Owners agree to ensure a well inaintained facility. 7. Drive►+ay aisles and parkiny spaces Mill be properly marked througfi signing and striping to ensure an orderly and safe moveaient of traffic through the site. 8. Operating hours will not exceed 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. 9. Lfghting on canopy over the pumps M►ould be directed doNnward to reduce the effect on adjacent properties. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that the provisions of this agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the parties hereto, their successors anA assigns and all subsequent o►+ners of the property here described. An executed copy of this Agreernent shall be filed with the Anoka County Register of Deeds and made a part of and be binding upon the above described property. IN MITNESS MHEREOF. the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands this Ilthday of AucLu�t _. 1978. � � m 7C 7D ___ AGREEMENT SUPERAMERICA STATIONS, 1NL./CITY OF FR10LEr This instrument drafted by: City of Fridley 6�31 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 (Seal) STATE OF MINYESOTA) i ss couKTr o� u�oKa _1:�c.--��°'_'" _ I' "`�— Mayor - Milliam J ee City of Fridley � � �� - �� • City Manager - a im M. Quresh� City of Fridley On this day of , 1978. before me, a Notary Public within and for said County. persona)ly appeared William J. f�ee and Nasim M. Qureshi. to me persona)ly kno►vn, wfio being each by me duly sr+orn they did say that they are respectively the Mayor and the City Manager of tAe City of Fridley. the municipal torporation named ie the foregoing instru- ment, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said municipat corporation and said William J. Nee and Nasim M. Qureshi acknowled9ed said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipal corporation. �Iotary Public Superamerica Stations. lnt. . Fee Ormer Richard A. J sen Vice President it1T-- e � B�� • ` �� Assisiant Secretary Titl e STATE OF MINi�ESOTA� ss COUYTII OF HE��NEPIN ) Qn this llth day of August , 1978. before me. a Notary Public v►ithin and for said County personally appeared RicharE A. Jensen and W. M. Seiffert , to De personally known, Nho being each by me du y-i sworn they did say t at they are respectively the Yice President and the lisst. Secretarr of said corporation named in the foregoing instrument. and that the instrument was signed in behalf of said corpora- tion by authority of its Board of Directors and said Richard A. Jensen and N. 1t. Seiffert acknowled e aid,,jnstrument to be the free act and deed of said �ao w. �►cus�x+ ?�:�.-. ' Z�- s. � /C1�T t'J�LI: - MIn�ESOT� � �'� ncnNr�:� cc�.�r _.�_ / �l� _�„�i�� , ��. �_.�.,. F.-:.,►�._..,�,: �.r.,<r �tl ` Lti c _ 7E SUPERAMERICA . • ��y�_ //• . S8'� ' �4 ' ! . : 8�� ia : :5�3cs � : aYENUE: �:�t � �� j�ti.l.��d/I(� �I l• _ ' �¢r � 5� ` % F s� �■■�■� . SUPERAMERICA SP 77-17 ` �` 5667 University Ave. NE � �r � �� /Q�� ry1�� ♦ : � „� �. , : �� .`", � se � s 9 '�/�� w � /�' ��`A �- 'S� � S�� F �" � 's'--T--'� W 'c...:_ . .Q'� ' �' ' 3°�'° .� ,� �'0�; b `,S�'�� sP �� , •�w so :�- „r "—r ._---- - •-.��11IN�N� ^'{'�l p�`• .J � . , I s + i' �.r.-� •�,r„• �•�-�_._._ - .--� _ . • . ..'-�r. � - �s:.,.��i.� • � _ � - � ' � � � � - ' •- ' k :i.�-liLl : �."1 � r` . r.,.�:,_ - �:� � . `.4 _,� �� : • ',.�- 5�'TK.'.:.: ::�- -_ •�. �:;.,.�� AVE�-��:-.�._... ..�. . .>. � .., ,, :, y -:, ;,;. . : � . � _ .;.�.. �,. � w � .a, �•,. �L • �� , � � . ' �P�;:: � :;- ., � � . - t -� ;'-`-- 56 �8 . 5�9 5 . . : -;: -� � =, ' :.', :: � 4 � AS -- : � �, . .�a�,:- _ :...� �b�a • �.. ��$ . . _ . :;, � _.;,�:`-`� . ' -- � � 5�-•� � _ ., . J, ,_ - r�� .. :;�.. 4` -- ��`.� � �5�1 ''S6Z6. ' w . _.z� - . . . .,,.� . .... �6� - _ :._ . A�� . � f -y = -56tb�' w r� '.56�6 � — S :. � . :+ . ;�;'. �_i' - ';�;.- � + �`3s� - T— �� 5�� - � � -� v� �S�z9 � ' . . � � _ �,. . .: : _.. --- : -�(,14_ � . _ .•a'�!� •�s:.�';.+.�� ... .- �1A � +i-J(� l • � •r �' � � . . ' � - . � '• .s r 3 • � �!J �' ��5 . ' ' - � - •- .�610 Sbf5 56�L' � 5� � . ,; -�; . . " ' �: � � - - . . � ., . � s� .' . _ ��,:.Y �. . •:...: ; �� _ _ �', .5,. ; _. ; - _.,.;� . .� - . _.. _ '"= - s!Sb08 � 56i3 ~ _ . � + -� . ;� . -.� �� : � _ _ � . _. ^r �i n . �s �.:� � - . •z : � � - - . � �_ :: j: • � F -S6�t- ' Q r 3bo9 s+ � � ��, .r� • ". N n . . j� � ' �iI :� � - � , � . . ; _ .=.:, .' .. . _ � -��_ _ • �b0±' - � '. � ..::; Z� •• • ; .� � /: e /�' � + i! •i � � . �• j�..`._ .. .]..F� .x� .+��r� � \ _qr � ipl� �� • ri• fI ?��2• � • . , . �� - , � - . .: . � .� . _ ` �z=y'J 6 �,i'� � ''; : ` ' isv E. 4 �ii .. , . " _ � . -_ - : :�.�r• ' �.a►.vi. '��"� ...r �� a..i+ - _",:' •;� - � � s : . . :.ir �. %.� '�'.s�� SS�O � � `�5� S � �a � :: .-- - - � - � - �t :: _s'� i, �� : i s , •. ;.- �� : i ../ � '� . � • . •� � :'► •,. :-,:',� 11'--�'� � �� • � � � • . . . . . 4' ''` �"; .- _-�. - . : t��,,�_ � �- 5; i • • s � . - r.,�`-• r' - - - - • . t � _ `�.�1` . � � �'� ' .. . _ .`'_ . .� � .. t _ !� . . � _u= ' �� . -S !� � � - • . .�= •"- .,• ' T_ y {* • � , . . _ - �: tf . a: . ;� . .��. ..�..__. 1 �` ' - •�i �.�`� : -1 : - - - � � •.► .. � i_ ".-�+b.� - �,. �� 1 . � � � • ��J�1.•�' .. �-^'. . - � � .. - ._• •.•�t • +• .i . ..�- ` i' .��F. ' �r T'. :�'. / +• , t ' _ ' , ' _ - .. �,si . . ... . . • - >. : _ . � 1 �.... ' _ �. � �� _ � . �. a. _ • ' •� � " '�,_'• �f :3�' •�� ! ' �� Zf � ��,.. . _�� . --r�-.�..._..� � � - _—�-- - � . .- . . �� •a� • i � � `` • .: - � . � 3 . �.�sw �� r►,.• •• •• • 1 � � ILi�y ' r ..r � 2 � � . i! - � r.: • 1 -�. :. ' i -+�.. .�� " ' _'vi:�..� � ;__.__ �� . • J M 'F . . . . �. � � � r; • : � � .��.: � �" �. •�� .�.. � ;�� ' ' ' t �. H 1 G }{ � a Y .. � . • ._-�. ':. - �r_. .- � . ::� ^ M �- _: ' .- --. ; --;- ._ - . � � • '��_"�_�:"T,�"�: � '. :O � •«_s� . ,•_.,�` '.'. Or� 1� •C ► �'_ • � . ' • . - ��►•.. ' � �i� � =� --�•••• /�. - -•,�` .%•,' tT • .� w� '�, . �... �: -:�. .' ' - • � � ' • �. � l �� .'T.� ' /'�' i� � :i f .i ' � N �` � � � � • /. . � � _ : GMHCo City Council City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Councilmembers: GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY, P.A. A Aojtssiaa/ Corporation ojCrnifitd PuMic Accounrmus September 8, ]982 This letter will confirm our understanding of the arrangements covering our examination of the financial statements of the City of Fridley, Minnesota for the year ending December 31, 1982. We will examine the combined balance sheet as of December 31, 1982, and the related combined financial statements for the year then ended. Our examination will be made in accordance with generally accepted suditing standards and will include such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. The objective of our examination is to express an unqualified opinion on the financial statements, although it is possible that facts or circumstances encountered may require us to express a less than unqualified opinion. Our procedures will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts, tests of the physical existence of inventories and direct con£irmation of receivables and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected customers, creditors, legal counsel and banks. At the conclus�on of oLr examination, we will request certain written representations from your staff about the financial statements and matters related thereto. The fair presentation of financial position and results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles is manage— ment's responsibility. Management is resgunsible for the development, implementation and maintenance of an adequate system of internal accounting control and for the accuracy of the financial statements. Although we may advise you about appropriate accounting principles and their applica— tion, the selection and method of application are responsibilities solely of management. 175 SOUTH P�A24 BUILDING WAVZATA BOULEVARD AT HIGHWAV � pp MINNEAPOUS. MINNESOTA 55416 6t 2/546-2�566 : ' City Council of Fridley, Minnesota September 8, 1982 Page 2 Our engagement is subject to the inherent risk that material errors, irregularities or illegal acts, including fraud or defalcations, if they exist, will not be detected. However, we will inform you of any such matters that come to our attention. During the course of our engagement, we may observe opportunities for economy in or improved controls over your operations. We will bring such matters to the attention of the appropriate level of management, either orally or in writing. Please indicate your agreement to these arrangements by signing the attached copy of this letter and returning it to us. We appreciate your confidence in retaining us as your certified public _ accountants and look forward to working with you and your staff. � JGM:dmd Enclosures Very truly yours, GEORGE M. HANSEN COriPANY, P.A. //' � J. Gre or M r h 8 Y P Y Approved by: City of Fridley, Minnesota Date n+� c�T� o� FqIDL Y OIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE September 22, 1982 FROM O.P.W. John G. Flora SUB,lECT Stop Si gn Peti ti on 7-82 � MEMORANDUM I TO ACTfON INFO• Nasim Qureshi, City Manager _ We have received petition 7-82 requesting a four way stop sign at the intersection of 45th and 2i Streets. Since this is a border intersection the City Counclls of both Columbia Heights and Fridley must agree on an action. In accordance with our policy of staffing STOP sign actions througl� the �Rerqy Commission and Columbia Heights' policy of review thrnugh their Traffic Commission --- we will present this petition to the Energy Commission at their next meeting and then submit the recommendations of both commissions to the City Council for consideration. JGF/mc . . 9R � i CITY OF FRLDLEY , PETITIUN COVER SHEET � Petttion No. �-82 Date Received September 20, 1982 object Request for four stop signs be errected or a two-way stop at the intersection of 45th and 2� Petition Checked By . Date . Percent Signing Referred to City Council Disposition _ � 9B lie, tbe undersigned resideats p= ��e� aod Oolues�ia Beigbta �re great� ooneeraeQ abaut tbe basaraou� interaection of �Stb aad 2�. '1'�ia intenectioa has �cen the citt j of �nmero�s accidenta o�er the � �►esrs� threatcning tbe aatet�r ot !lri�era aad bone- ovaera alike. As of this date the int,�nectioa Deu ane •top sigae �ad oae �rield �ign• -�',✓ . -.. - s+e request that hstop sigris be errecLeQ �Pleaae oonsi r th� seriausaea• of !b i• r�- que�t� it could grest2� impro�e the ssfety of our tvo com�nitys.`. • � , � �t,til�� ys 7 S ��' . �� ' - . -, � �-fi�-- �. =,� S'� �� - �� - �.�ut � ,�� 7�cc%�.�t, �-59/ 2Gi .s� /:'� `� _ .�`. ,Sz�. �',�� S7z, -l� �'.� `� � �.�, ys � � ��- , 1 C!�/� � ' 1 / • =��A s �7-' �� . tG, y / �`� �� . � �� . , �,� /��s .� �f '�.�I � 1/i� . " S 72 _ . / �' � . �} �L . . � _ _ �' /d; . �.� � � .�� -�G.� �� Z 6 �t �� ,/.� c . 3 �ll� . f t . , ��,� �� ,� � � - %�� 5� � a �� v� � , � .�� _ „ � � ��G r ` .�L�� .�'so ^/ .� - �yrc�t, �' �� '� . . �� -�'.�.,,a-t n � . �� . �j� � �,�- ��o'u-�'._.t-��— — y.5' 7 g ��Z � • ' / - � . ,� �� , 7�� , �� 4 �q o � �� s� �,� �}�'L� 9� 7��-°� �, ,. ,%/�/!'��; =f� .��,� -7 ,� ` ��, ��. ?�� ' �?�`[� � '.t -�'`'�/ , pt �_ �'.� y' f' C-, / �S/yT� h "` ' '� g. �u�.-;y � �� " �s �s- °'Ln-� r`�.` �� ,,,r-�.�'S �? �� :r N£ �cl. N� �. ,,�1/1/ � �� c, � a ��'.•' /�1 C/�ct^Q�� . �� • � r,,,�.a �. ,�,�,la,�� s 9 � �'� .�. I� i . C� � j� • j .� - + Sfllil k• M. CNOl15� Q43-� ��. S7. N. F. C�� •�rs /11lN• Ssqzl � _ . � �.�� /(„�'-r „� '`/ya7 �%a s��= C`��...�/rj s��i?� � � . - - -� /7 ' " .�i,c�Q�(��Z/ Z 'l2 �'��) << C'�/, • fl ��,, � � l•C � � �,� :,��J.��..� , .-- � � .� � �yr � �lM �i� � � D.�C�,y--�`�-Y �� ,s- � _ -r G. . r�.� � r n . �' � . s�' 7.;J �� . . / /% �, I ` i -(' y�oy-�� ` s-��,� ;r. �r��'\ � � � � l L•?-�I1ii �t�/' t LL . • / '. � . • _ - — - —.------- - - — . � _ . _ . -..r* ��_. . . _._. _ . - - -- -'- _----- --""_ -----�'' . j;., .. .. �.. . �. ;� �� ... . �. :� ' � . ..,.�M . Y• l+`.y-.��: ,- .; tA; - K,•`:. 2� �. � •; 9C iie, tbe undenigned reaidents of Fridley aad Columbia Heighta are greatllr ooncerned about tbe bazardou� interaection of �Sth �ad 2�. Ttiis interseetioa bas Deen l.be cit,e o! numerous �ecid�at� o�rer �-.+:.� .� . tiie yesrs, tbrestening tbe satety o! dri�rers: aad bomeovaers aliie. _ -�:;' �:, Aa ot this date:tise intenection bss one stdp a�gn a►nd oae �rield �i �-e re est that hsto si `� � b f� ga- qu p gns De errecte� Pleaa co �ider tbe aeriouaness of this request, it oauld great�y impro�►e tbe ialet� ot our tw co�unitjra. �Y�75 �.h � .�• � � �� s yi _ �� ol►ufi d t��!r�c,�� ' �� .� �� -�- � �� a. � S�` .�i �'. a�� . „t��S//� 2� � ,�, _�/ � .�� y y�6 �/a.� ��° ,�% �`1�� o -Z � S-? � . � 7- y� 7-rj� t� c�e�.- � . .� � .��.24, `�j (�l )��.��.{ �J �1 ��r`:�j �'I �� . :� � , . r�� ,/1�, .L�.- ` . , .�� _ n ,�;. ��. �� c/3„ - a 1�-, � � �� _1 � ti � � `, `�..y' �' �l �14 Y a �� S ►• 1'1.E. % �� / ��° • J� . 1��.,ef�rw� � �� . - ��?ivJ • G�►�t�.��- ��.�c�''�O y J3 � — a? %� St . �v � ��!�2 � . d S r N� � - _. � Y� . `�� Zn ;' ��,�,�, ti.,�,�; �.��i.�.:�t. �i�, - � � , , � ; ��s .1,�,-.. �- � �ti� �,�:� a 1, . �� ,� :�. ��- ._ .-.. - _ . , � ��. -; � � 2 . � ° `� �'� �, �� r�.�.� ,-,��..,�- 3�-a � ,�� ,, �. � , .��:�- �� ,�, yl.� . �t �,-� � �-,b . ��Q �u,vs- �iz- , ,_ _� � . � ___ . ►� � , --- - ---- � � 9 �J , �. �3 y� �, � = � -� ;,� . 13� . . �, ,��jst �- ��=-r�--� 5��1e �� -�-� � .�� - . .� ,�M�l�s � . y�s �� J � �. � '`tbss �-�'Z st. t�,r-_ ,� �G � ,�t -� .,Q� � � / 7' � �:L d.�� /� � � � � , � � p,� `/y'�c�`��. 1�� o �'� -�a-I �i �- '�r�,�f �.-�,C,� � 7�S � a- St 1',�f ��- ��c,�l� '�?3 3 ��. s t �' � �, :.�� %�� Z�.c�� 75'T �% S�". /I� �� , �'!�'-y�; �'' ..-`` �� d � / ;F � �� .� . �� lt � �/� S� ' �/ °. � � 3 z� /�� 1 1� � � �?Z� .� ` `% �� 2 �� . ��' �'��. �.-..�,� ,�"� �. � o � �� . �� .�` ��'.�- ��=� ,��1 -�.-_y�� ?.St�� ,v..er`f� .—c.cv., i�'.t �( �.�'.�Q . .� ' .�' � - � -- ----- -- _------- .+ -- ---- -- --- - -------__ _- - - - -- �s�i� ��-,�,� r-.�% .� , - - ----- - - -- ----- -- -- _-- r � } ;. CITY OF fRIDLEY MEMORANOUM T0: NASIM M. QURESHI, CI7Y MANAGER FROM: SID INMAN, DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: MARK HAGGERTY OFFICE PROJECT DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 As you recall, the HRA met in a special meeting to approve the Mark Haggerty Office Project and additionally included a blanket resolution for the authorization for sale of bonds for the - project. Due to the timing of the meeting, we were unable to determine the exact amount of the bonding potential for the project. Attached is a copy of the resolution from the HRA including the correct amount of bonding and a resolution for the City Council authorizing the sale in the same amount. I have also included some information from Ehlers and Associates regarding the feasibility of that office project bond. These items will be included in the September 27 Agenda for City council approval. If you have any further questions, please feel free to let me know. SCI:sh Attachments � 10 ERTRACT OF MINDTffi OF MEL'I'ING OF THS COUNCIL OF TAB C1TY OF FRIDLBY ANOSA COIINTY, MINNESOTA Pucsuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the Couneil of the City of Fri�ey, Minnesota, was duly held at the Council Chambers in said City on Monday, the 2�th day of September, 1982, at o'clock p.m. The following members were present: and the following were absent: s s � s s s s s s The following resolution was Qresented by Councilmember who moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND 3ALE OF �600,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TA% INCREMENT RE— DEYEGOPMENT BONDS OF 1982, SERIES II�ff2.� - L�f/JT� /2 10 A c,f y ��-f�« f �'= ��` `� BE IT RESOLYED By the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows: l. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 462.521 and 273.71 to 273.78 icollectively the "Act"), the Nousing and RedeveIopment Authority of the City of Fridley (the "Authority"), has aQplied to and received from the City Council of the City of Fridley approval of a redevelopment project described as The Center City Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Tax lncrement Financing District"). 2. The City Council held e public hearing aftee public notice and has made findings as required by the Act and has aQproved the Tax Increment Financin� district by Resolutions adopted on �Viay 15, 1979. 3. By resolution o� , 1982, the Authority has requested the City to issue and se]1 its Generai Obligation Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds Phase III to �nance public redevelopment of certain parcels of land (collectively the "Project") within the Tax Increment Financing District, and has bound the HRA to the terms of the Agreement of Cooneration Between the Iiousing and Redevelopment Authority and the City, dated September 13, 1979, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. T> �1 ' 4. Funds are needed at this time to eontinue to provide money for public improvernents within the Tax Inerement Financing District and to provide monies for capitalized interest and administrative costs, all of which costs (the "Redevelopment Cost") are presently estimated as follows: Land Acquisition and Cost Legal, Fiscal, Administrative Costs Less: 1984 Tax Increment Reeeipt Plus: Cepitalized Debt Service (Offset by Investment Income) Discount Allowance BOND ISSUE ;498,858 12,000 �510,858 23,022 5487,825 100,425 E588,250 11,750 �600,000 5. Tfie City is authorized by Section 273.77 of the Act to issue General Obli;ation Tax Increment Redevelopment 3onds if the City and the Authority by Agreement pledge tax increments, revenues and assessments received from the District for the payment of principal of and interest on bonds issued in aid of the redevelopment project pursuant to the Act, and said pledge has been made and is a part of the aforementioned agreement dated September 13, 1979. 6. The pledge of tax increments has been made by written agreement executed by the Authority and the City end filed with the County Auditor and when such an egreement is made and filed, the City may issue general obligation bonds as provided in !�iinnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, subject only to the conditions required for bonds issued to finance improvement costs reimbursable from special assessments. 7. The Authority has adopted a resolution determining the need for the financing, has approved the form of Agreement �3ce�-"£x#i�-A", and has requested the City Council to issue General Obligation Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds under the authority of the Aet. 8. It is hereby determined that it is neeessary for the City to sell its General Obligation Ta?c Increment Redevelopment Bonds to provide funds to finance Phase III of the Public Redevelopment Costs of the Project and that the sum of �588,250 is necessary to defray the Public Redevelopment Costs. _. r7 10 C 9. The agreement a is ratified, and the City Manager is directed to file an executed or eertified copy of the agreement with the County Auditor of Anoka County and obtain a certificate of filing. 10. In order to provide finaneing for such costs, the City shall therefore issue and sell its General Obligation Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds of 1982, Series II, (the "Bonds") in the amount of ;588,250. In order to provide in part the additional interest required to market the Bonds at this time, additional Bonds shall be issued in the amount of �11,750. Any excess of the purchase price over the sum of aS88,250 shall be credited to the debt service fund for the purpose of paying interest first comino due on the Bonds. 11. The �600,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds of 1982, Series II, shall be issued and sold in accordance with the terms of the at-tec� Official Notice of Sale " . 12. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to advertise the Bonds for sale in accordance with the attached notice of sale and to cause the abbreviated notice of sale e�t�e�e�@�s�xhi�a�� to be published in the manner required by law. The City Couneil shall meet on Monday , October 25, 1982, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., for the purpose of considering bids on the bonds and taking any other appropriate action. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted AYE: and the following voted NO: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Mayor City Clerk ,� . STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ANOKA CITY OF FRIDLEY I, the undersigned, being the duly quelified and acting City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully eompared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on September 27 � 1982, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is e full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to the - issuance and sale of �600,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds of 1982, Series II, of the City. WTTNESS My hand officially as such Clerk and the seal of the City this day of , 1982. (SEAL) City Clerk City of Fridley, Minnesota 10 D 10 E xaric$ oF s�r.8 ;600,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAR INCBEMENT BBDEVSLOPMENT BONDS OF 1982, SBRIF� II - C1TY OF FRIDLBY ANOHA COIINTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids for the purchase of the above bonds will be received until 4:30 o'clock p.m. at the office of Ehlers and Associates, Inc., Ficst National - Soo Line Concourse, 507 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Financisl Consultants to the City, on Monda,y, October 25 1982, �at whi ch time the bi ds wi 11 be opened and tabulated; the bids will be presented {o and considered by the City Council at its meeting which commences at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date in the City Hell. The aforedescribed bonds are issued on the following terms: Purpose and Security The purpose of the Bonds is to provide funds to finance the public redevelopment costs of a redevelopment project in a Tax Increment Financing District of the City. The Bonds will be general obligations of the issuer, for whieh its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged. . Date and �Vlaturities The bonds will be dated November 1, 1982, will be in denomination of �5,000 each (bidder's option) and will mature on February 1 in the following years and amounts: YEAR A:ViOUNT 1984 a 5,000 1985 5,000 1986 � 10,000 198? 10,000 1g88 25,000 1989 25,000 1990 25,000 1991 25,000 1992 50,000 1993 50,000 1994 50,000 1995 70,000 1996 75,000 1997 • ?S,ODO 1998 100,000 10 F All bonds maturing after February 1, 1994, ere subject to a call for prior redemption on said date and any interest payment date thereafter at par plus accrued interest. Interest Interest on the bonds will be payable on August 1, 1983, and semiannually thereafter on each February 1 and August 1. All bonds maturing on the same date must bear interest from date of issue until paid at a single, uniform rate, not exceeding the rate specified for bonds of any subsequent maturity. Each rate must be in an integral multiple of 5/100 of one percent, and no rate of interest nor the rtet effective average rate of the issue may exceed the maximum rate allowed by law. No supplemental ar "B" coupons will be permitted. Paying Agent Principal and interest will be made payable at any suitable bank in the United States designated by the successful bidder within 48 hours after award of sale, subject to approval by the City, and the City will Qay the reasonable and customary paying � agency charges. � Cusip Numbers The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printin� of CUSIP numbers on the bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchasec, if the purchaser waives any extension of the time of delivery caused thereby. Delive Within 40 days after sale, the City will furnish and deliver at the office of the purchaser or, at his option, will deposit with a bank in the United States selected by him and approved by the City as its agent to permit examination by and to deliver to the purchaser, the printed and executed bonds, the unqualified opinion thereon of bond counsel, and a certificate stating tfiat no liti,ation in any manner questioning their validity is then threateaed or pending. The charge of the delivery agent must be paid by the purchaser, but all other costs w�l be paid by the City. The purchase price must be paid upon delivery of the bonds, or within five days after deposit with the delivery agent, in funds available for expenditure by the City on the date of payment. Legal Opinion An unqualified legal opinion on this bond issue �vill be furnished by Messrs. Wurst, Pearson, Hamilton, Larson and Underwood, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The legal opinion will be printed on the bonds at the request of the purchaser. The legal opinion will state that the bonds ace valid and binding general obligations of the City, and the City is obligated and required to levy taxes for the principal and interest thereon as the same become due without limit ss to rate or amount. lOG Zj►pe of Bid - Amount Sealed bids must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to 4:30 o'clock p.m. on Monday, October 25, 1982. Each bid must�be unconditional and must be accompanied by a cashier's or certified eheek or bank draft in thr amount of ;12,000, payable to the City Treasurer, to be retained by the City as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder faiLs to comply therewith. Comparison of bids will be made on the basis of total interest cost, the bid authorizing the lowest net interest eost (total interest from date of bonds to stated maturities, less any cash premium or plus any amount less than �600,000 bid for principal) will be deemed the most favorable. No oral bid and no bid of less than �588,250 for principal plus accrued interest on all of the bonds will be considered, and the City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informality in any bid. BY OftDEft OF TAE CTTY COIINCII. Nasim Qureshi City Manager Fridley, Minnesota 10 � xaricE oF s� =600,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TA% INCREMENT REDEYBLOPMBNT BONDS OF 1982, SERIFS II CITY OF FRIDLBY ANORA CODNTY, B�INNESOTA These bonds will be offered on Monday, October 23� lgg2. gids will be received until 4:30 o'clock p.m. at the office of the Financial Consultants to the Citp, Ehlers and Associates, Inc., First National - Soo Line Concourse, 50? Marquette Avenue, Ariinneapolis, Minnesota, and the bids will be considered by the City Council at City Hall et its meeting at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on said date. The bonds consist of �600,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds of 1982, Series II. Dated November 1, 1982, the bonds will mature on February 1 in the years and amounts as follows: YEAR 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 AMOUNT � 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 25,000 25,OU0 25,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 ?0,000 ?5,000 ?5,000 100,000 All bonds maturing after February 1, 1994, are subject to a call for priar redemption on said date and any interest paym ent date thereafter, at par plus accrued interest. Interest will be payable on August 1, 1983, and semiannually thereafter. No rate of interest nor the net effective avecage rate of the issue may exceed the maximum permitted by Iaw. An unqualified le�al opinion will be furnished by tisessrs. Wurst, Pearson, Hamilton, Larson and Und�rwood, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The purpose of the Bonds is to provide funds to finance pvblic redevelopment costs of a redevelopment project in a Tax Increment Financing District of the City. The Bonds will be paid from tax increments. The full faith, credit and taxing powers of the City are pledged for the payment of the Bonds. No bid of less than �588,250 will be considered. BY ORDER OF THE C1TY COIINCII. Nasim Qureshi City Manager Fridley, Minnesota Dated September 27 , 1982 Further information may be obtained from and bids may be delivered to: Ehlers and Associates, Inc. First National - Soo Line Concourse 507 12arquette Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 339-8291 � 10 I TME c�TV oF t � � � FRIDLEY Hous�ni� and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FROM EXECUTIVE OIRECTOq DAT E Sentember 22. 1982 SUBJECT � � Waiver of Fees for HRA Activities ME MOR AN DU TO Nasim Qureshi John Flora MEMO NO. $2_71 11 ACTION INFO X The Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority is formally requesting a blanket waiver of all application fees pertaining to Fridley approval process directly applied for by the HRA {i.e., rezoning, vacation, platting, etc.). X We are requesting this in order to eliminate scattered requests for each application that is made in a11 or any subsequent districts, under the jurisdicti�n of the HRA. Please forward this item to the City Council for consideration of the request. JLBjde •�s:� i �. :. ��c.� •;,. • � i� r � v � -;�;ti • r•�v i t • .:t: M '.• '�� 1 1' J�J� •' Il1 '�.' �: �1 .�� 1� �:f� J �.� It �� `i�� WHIItEAS, the Fridley Housing and Reclevelopment Authority as a Public norr-profit Corporation has requested a blanket waiver o� all application fees pertaining to the City apprwal prooess directly applied for by the Authorityt �a W�EAS, it is in the best interest of the City to pranote the elimination of scattered requests for waiver of fees by t�e HRA in order to act more expediantly in the promotion of development within approved development districts. NOW, �IItEF�RE, BE IT RF50�,VID by the City Council of the City of Fric7ley, Minnesota, that the Council hereby �aives all application fees pertaining to the City approval prooess directly applied for by the Frid].ey Aousing and Rec]evelopment Authority. PASSID AND ADOPTID BY THE CITY Q')i,JNCII, OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY 'II�IS L�Y OF , 1982. . WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATi'E�T: SILNEY C. 1NM1�N - CITY (�E�tR 2/2/7/31 11 A n+� e�TV os FRlDL Y DIFiECTORATE OF puB��c woR�cs OATE FROM D.P.W, �ohn G. Flora TO SUBJECT Highway Bonding Constitutional Amendment � MEMOAANDUM I ACTIONI INFO. The Association of Metrapolitan Municipalities is endorsing an amendment to the Constitution limiting Highway Bonding interest rates and dollar amounts. The current 5� interest limit and $150 million bonding cap are not adequate for today's econorr�y and costs. Suggest the City Council consider the attached Resolution requesting amendment of the current limitations. JGF/mc Enclosures �A �.urioN No. —� ss2 RESOLUTION SUPPORTIN6 CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT #2 �N _ AMENDMENT TO THE MINNESOTA CONSTITUTION ON HI6HrAY BONDIN6, TO REMOVE RESTRICTION.S ON THE INTEREST RATES FOR ?HE AMOUNT OF TRUCK HI6FiMAY BONDS. MMEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley hes revieMed the fects concerning the need for a Minnesote Constitutionet J4mendment removing Highway Bonding Restrictione in the Minnesote Constitution and IVHEREAS, finds thet e 5� interest rste end i150 miltion meximum borroMing emount ere obsolete in current economic times� and WHEREAS� recognizes the urgent �eed to provide flexibility to the stete legisleture and edministretion to be eble to edequetely fund necessery T�uck Highwey and Bridge repeirs end reptecements� and WNEREAS� believes thet edditional capebility to support good highweys will elso aid in improving the economic vitelity of Minnesote end the City of Fridley by providing more jobs end trenspo�tetion fecilities for the movement of goads end a�eteriels in the stete. NpW, THEREFORE� BE IT RESOLVED� by the City Council of the City of Fridtey, � Ca�nty of Anoka� Stste of MinnesoLe� that Constitutional Amendment #2� en emendment to the Minnesote Constitution to remove restrictions on the interest rates for Lhe amount of Truck Highwey Bonds, be supported� end BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED� thet the City Council of the City of F�idley u�ges all residents of the city voting at the November 2� 1982 election, to cest a "yes" vote for Constitutionel Amendment #2 PASSEO AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIOLEY THIS DAY OF , 1982 . WILLIAM J. NEE — MAYOR ATTEST: SIDNEY C. INMAN — CITY CLERK � �� l' :_ � • � \� as ociafiion of me�ro olitan munic�alities p (C : . �: � � r ; ,. . � '. . .. �B Septem*�e: 3, 1982 TO: Ch-ef �drli�istrater Officials, h.�!�! Mer.ibez Cities FRGrl: Jern Peterso .; £xecutive Director There as� three ite.=.s I would Iike to bring to your attention: .I. CO:: _. i i?iTIDNAL F�'V�!L.VT r�2, HIGNWAY BONDING The h:�K Transportation Cormn.ittee and Board of Directors ha�� co:LSidered the pro�osed Aighaey 3o.�ding Constitutional Amendment and adopted a position of act=�e ss:port. T:e coastitutional Iimitations on both ir,t�rest rate and do2?er �-�ur.t� for highvay bonding are obsolete and tota�l� out of step with curre::t econozc coaditions and high:ray needs. The A.�!�! 3oard wouId arge member cities and officials to ta%e an active role in supao*t of a.-.e^��e�t number two. F:e are providing a fact s^set and model resoiution for �alr consideration. It is hoped that beczcse of the magnitude and in.�act of hic'�;�ay needs in the Metropolitan Area, yaur city wi21 support the issus, atte��t to gain publicity and support through y�ss 3ua1 news media, and atte-!�t on ar. individual basis to inflaence positive s::: �o=t from yovr constit�sneg. This a,:�e.^.3�ent was before the voters fn 1980 and did recei:•� a substantial majorit� vote fro� those voting on the issue. Xowever, to =.ass a constitvtional amend��e�t nee3s a majority vote of e11 Fersons votiag. T^:.�=, t�:�se not voti�g yes or n� are coLnted as no. It is onr hope that you, as :�ca? officials, will take the initiative on this extremely important issue. 2. AMM J�:EI!B�r2SHIP MEETING TO ADOFT LEGISLATIVE POLICY - b'OY�:f3:R 18, I982 For your advance planning, there will be a generai members::_� r�eting on 'Thursday evening, November IB, 1982. The pvrpose of th� r=eting is to adopt Legis2ative Policy for the next Legislative Session beginr.=r.g in January of Z983. A meeting notice with the complete meeting details and copi:s of the proposed policies will be mailed in earlr� October, but please ressr�s the date now. 3. REGIONAL :4FETItiG - L.R1C AND AMM CO-SPONSORED - SEPTEMBER 26, 298� IN FlRPLEG,'OOD - REAlIA'DER Recently yoo shon2d have received a notice and invitatio� `or tae Regiona2 !�.•eeting of the League of l�innesota Cities, co-sponsored by the �ssac?ation of Eletropo2itan Municipalities. The meeting wi12 be held on Thursday, S��e:ber 26th. at the 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-5600 ., t 12 C -z- Jloliday Zru� in Xaplewood with both afternoon and evening sessions. Tv better meet the needs and interests of city officials in the 1►IetropoZitan Area, some changes are being n�ade to the evening meeting agenda. Clyde A21en, State Corranissioner of Revenue, wi21 be present to npdate you on the overall state financial picture and any bearing �t may have on municipalities and future atate aid, levy Iimits, etc. he are hoping that Gordon Voss, State Represent- ati �e from Blaine and Chairman of the Ifonse Committee on Loca2 and Urban 14ffairs, an�' Crairman of the Loca2 Po2icy Task Force, wi21 also be present to brief you on w:at is happening with the Loca2 Policy Task Force. As you may know, the Loc31 Policy Task Force was created by an executive order of the Governor to ge� a better handle oa the interre2ationship between the State and Loca3 units of go.a_ :.�^ent ir.clr�ir.g t1:s f;ne�cial relationship. Pc�th of the�e b�=Ei�^.gs s?:oL�d be o` interest: P.eserz•ations shou2d be made with the City of Maplewood which is host?ng this mee:�ng.D:ner portions of the evening program w3II be s.'�ortened to acc��odate those p�ese�tations so as not to add to the overall time al2ocated to f1. eve:ang session. � WE == pUEST Tht.r,i :�E ��vINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL RECEIVI :'�: THIS FULLETIN I:OPY OR DIS �iBUTE THIS �NFOR�aTION TO THE APPROPRIATE OFFICIALS SN YOUR CITY. � . . , �+ FACT SHEET � D � CO3:STITUTIOhAL 2��E2�DMEtJT 02� iiIGH(r�AY B01DS-�12�:ENDN,�I�IT �2 l. The anencl�nent cioes two things : - rer�oves obsolete 5$ interest limit (established in 1920) - removes $150 million cap (established in 1956) 2. Passage of the amend.-nent will: • - ir.�ediately remove an impeciiment to the sale of S19 million of previousl}• authozized bridge replaccment bonds - provide an additional high��ay funding option to future legis- lat•.:res and adnir.istrations 3. The �:rgent need for transportation fun8inq continues. - road use is increasinq - t':e dedicate� h�s`�way fund is not sensitive to inflation ana coatinually �al�s behind the level of need • - t'.:e curre::t �uac� ng level, called "patch ar,�l repair Ievel" fs rzally sub-..-�argir.al in meeting road user needs - - b=sed on cuzzz:.t �unding zoads are reconstructed once every 3i0 years - alnost S00 brioges on the Trunk Highway system are deficient 4. Pass=c2 of the a:�ear.uent is a small step totaards improving eco- nomic vitalit}• of 2•�innes��a. - w•ill enable inprovement bzid,� rEpldcements - will provide jobs (53 jabs are created either directly or in- directly fro:� every one r:.illion dollars spent on highway con- struction� 5. The g=oups tha� have voiced support for passage are a good ir��i- catioa of the izportance this change has for tSinnesota. - Labor � - B•�siness - Agric��lture - highway Users: Cars � Trucks - �Iighway Action Groups - State Er.ecutives - Legislators and Candidates 6. Theze are no knot�:n organizations in op�osition. Question to appear on November Ballot: "Shail the tSinnesota Con�titution be amended to remove restric- tions on the interest rates for and the amount of Trunk i�i.ghway Bonds?" Yes No 0 OiRECTORATE OF puB��c woRKs FqiDL�Y DATE , September 22, 1982 FROM D.P.W. ,]phn G� F7er SUB.�ECT Comprehensive Plan 13 M EMO R A N DUM TO �ureshi, City Manaqe ACTIONI INFO• We submitted our Draft Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council in November 1981. Their comments and recommendations were received in February 1982. We have updated our Draft Plan and incorporated all of the Metropolitan Council's requirements. The final plan was staffed through all the departments and submitted to the City Council on August 20, 1982. In order to submit the Final Comprehensive Plan to the printer and make distribution, plus obtain the final Planning funds of $4729 from the Metropolitan Council�the City Council must adopt a resolution accepting the Plan. Recommend the City Council adopt the attached resolution for the Comprehensive Plan. JGF/mc :..� �.�:. :. ;_.+`� � �� ' ��;�Y�: ' �� :,' � WI�REAS, �e City Co�cil of the City of Fridley did on December 1, 1980, submit to the M�etropolitan Co�nicil o�pies of the �idley Canprdlensive Plan to reviewj and WI�REAS, �e Metrapolitan Coi.mcil, an its authority �mder Section-473.175 of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, did oonduct said review= and WI�tFAS, On February 11, 1982, the Metropolitan Council acbpted Resolution No. 32 — 1482 whici� adopted reconBnendations of the physical Develqxnent Committee regarding the FYidley Canprehensive Plans and. W�iF.REAS, the Metrt�litan Council recocn¢nenc3ations stated that no modifi�tions are required as authorized in Minnesota Stabute 473.175 Subd. lf and WHIItEAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act 473.864 S�bd. 1 provides that eacii goverrm►ental unit shall ac3opt its Canprehensive Plan within nine months of a final decision by the Metropolitan Cau�cil. NOW, �iEEtF�URE, BE IT RFSC�,VID, that the City Cou�cil of th e Ci ty of Fr i dle hereby adopts its Comprehensive Plan with the modif ications noted in Re�er- ral Report No.81-260, which correspond to suggestions of the Metropolitan Co�mcil staff. PASSID AND ADOPTID BY �iE CITY �fJNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS LAY OF , 1982. WII�LIAM J. NEE - MAYUR AZ�'F�T: SIDNEY C. Il�N - CITY (L�2R 13 A _ , . . . - -- ATTACHMENT � 13 .�i • - • • _� . � for Release: 4:00 p.�a., 02.11.62 � Business Item No. 6-6 � . . . � . METROPOLITAN COUNCII � Suite 300 Nietro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 35101 . �. 291-6359 � ... . , � February 5, 1982 REPORT OF THE PHYSICAL OEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE � REFERRAL REPORT N0. 81-260 _� T0: Metropolitan Council � SUBJECT: City of Fridley Comprehensive Plan Review Metropolitan Council Oistrict 13 � � Metropolitan Council Referral file No. 8746-5 On February 4, 1982, the Physical Development Comnittee considered the attached report on the Compreheastve Plan of the City of Fridley. The recommendations were adopted as follows: - RECOMMENDATIONS That the City of Fridley by advised that: � • A. This report constitutes the Council's official review required under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. B. No P1an modifications are required as authorized in Minnesota Statutes Sec. 473.175, Subd. 1. C. The Plan relates to the metropolitan system plans as follows: l. The Ptan is in conformance with metropolitan system plan for transportation and recreation open space. -� � 2. The P1an is in confornMance �rith the metropolitan system plan for - .• - = � sewers. � � � _r; _ :�.. . � - -, frid]ey may plan a sewage flow of 4.37 mgd for 1990. The Council - � will review this flow when revising the Water Quality Management Policy Plan flow projections. � . . City of Fridiey -� Comprehensive Plan Reviea Page Tiro ATTACHMEN7 A 13 C . ... . , 3. The fridley Plan is not consistent with the Aviation Chapter of the Metropolitan Development 6uide, the Plan should make specific reference to Mn/DOT rule 14 MCAR 1.3015 •Determini�g obstructions to air-navigation, subsection (C) 'Notification" and (0) "General airspace." Reference to Aero-13 should be changed to 14 MCAR 1.3018, concerning seaplane operations in the Metropolitan Area. In addition the above references should be included in the implementation section of the Plan and incorporated into the local codes. . � D. The Plan appears compatible with the plans of adjacent government units and affected school districts. E. The Plan relates to other adopted Metropolitan Oevelopment Guide chapters as follor+s. :-;,�.� _ . . -.�,: - 1. The Plan is consistent with the Development framework, tfie Housing chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide, and the Investment Framework. . 2. To meet the information requirements specified in M5A 473.852, Subdivision A. the capital improvement program must contain,an itemized program for a five year prospective period with estimated costs, the need and the financial impact that the improvements wi11 have on the City. Oata for two more years should be added to the CIP. A projected debt and debt repayment program should be planned for any projects which may be financed by borrowi�gs. At such time as the City amends its capital improvement program it should send it to the Metropolitan Council for review and comnent. 3. Environmental Protection The Plan is generally consistent with the Protection Open Space and Water Resources chapters and metropolitan polices for stormwater management. A summary of the standards to be included in proposed ordinances for the protection of steep slopes, woodlands and wetlands should be submitted to the Council for review and comment prior to their adoption by the City consistent with Minn. Stat. 413.206. � �J � I.• .••• . ATTACHMENT 13 D City of Fridley � � t Co�rprehensive P1an Revier+ Page Three � 4. Solid Maste Fridley's Plan is in conformance Mith Minnesota Statutes, Section . 473.$11, Subdivision 5, requiring nunicipal adaption of an • ordinance governing solid waste collection and disposal. Respectfully submitted, MB:emp Attachment A055P2 � � Marcia Bennett, Chairperson • ' MEMO �82-57 13 E MEMO T0: CITY COUWCIL MEMBERS, NASIM QURESHI, JOHN FLORA. JERRY BOARDMAN. MEMO FROM: BILL DEBLON �f%� • �• ME.MO DATE: AUGUST 12, 1982 REGARDING: FRIDLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLA�J - FINAL DRAFT Attached is the final draft of Fridley's Comprehensive Plan as required bv the Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976. The plan has gone throuc�h an extensive process of review and revision since it was first submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review on December 1. 1980. That process is listed in chronological order below: 12/1/80 Approved resolution to submit plan to the Metropolitan Council 12/23/30 Metropolitan Council determined that the plan �et the pre-review procedural requirements of the Land Planning Act. 12/30/80 Official review comnenced (Adequacy to be determinedj 1/29/81 3/3/81 3/3/81 - 10/10/81 1�JI28/81 11/9/81 Official Plan review suspended by the Metropolitan Council due to insuffiecient information. Meeting witF the Ftetropolitan Council to identify informational inadequacies. Plan amended to include additional information and clarification as determined by the Pletropolitan Council. Planning Corrmission review of amended plan. City Council review and aporoval for re-submittal to the ttetro�ol- itan Council. 11/13/81 Plan re-submitted to the Metropolitan Council. 12/1/81 1/27/82 1/29/32 2/4/82 Plan deterr.ained to contain sufficient informatio� and clarif.ication for official review to re-comrnence. Final review by Metropolitan Council Staff. Transmittal to Metropo]itan Council Physical Developnent Comnittee. Physical Development Comnittee reviewed and approved plan. 2/11/82 7he l�tetropolitaa Council cor�pleted its official review as required bv th� Metropolitan land Planninq Act. (See letter dated 2/23/82 and attachnent. Minor changes were suggested). 2/23/82 _ Minor changes as a result of Metropolitan Council review were 8/1/g2 incorpora�ed �rtto plan. � ' .- Specific changes in the plan since City Council's last review are listed below: OVERYIEW SECTIOt� � �3 F Page 0-10, Figure 0-2 entitled "Neighborhood Boundaries"-,replaced by "Perceived Neic�hborhoods" map as a result of further study and inter- action with the Neighborhood Services Division of the Potice Department. (This map will be the official neighborhood map for Fridley's partici- pation in the U.S. Bureau of Census' Neiqhborhood Statistic Proqram.) LAND USE SECTION Page 1-9, Figure seaplane use of Mississippi and 1-1 entitled "Existing Land Use" was ar�ended to include the Mississippi. Text discussion of seaplane use of the other Aviation considerations are included on page 1-14. EP�Y I ROi�ME�1TAL SECT I ON No Changes HOUSING SECTIO�� No Changes PARKS b OPEN SPACE SECTION Page 4-8, Riverview Heights and North Park were added Parks". Page 4-9, Fi�ure 4-1 entitled "Park System" clude the most recent park and trail system. TRANSPORTATIOt� SECTION as "Speci'al Use was amended to in- Page 5-13, the number of river crossings via the I694 bridqe were re- vised from 53,335 to 36,450 eastbound vehicles per day and from 65,250 to 44,550 westbound vehicles per day. Page 5-24. 1979 Traffic volumes on I694 were revised from 18,000 to 35.800 westbound vehicles oer day and from 26,000 to 33,100 eastbound vehicles �er day. 1990 7raffic volumes were revised to 54,000 westbound VPD and 51,9fl0 eastbound VPD. Page 5-25. Figure 5-10 entitled "Existing and Projected Average �aily Traffic" was amended accordingly. WATER, SEWER, b SOLIO WASTE Page 6-9, Figure 6-1 entitled "IJater Supply System" was changed by adding numbering of rvells. Page 6-7, Figure 6-7 entitled "Hoore Lake Sub- watersheds" r�►as enlarged to show better detail of flow direction. IMPLEMEWTATION SECTION Page 7-5, A sectian entitied "Air Safety" was added. Page 7-7, Table 7-7 entitled "�'arks and Open Space Capital Improvements Program" was amended to include dollar figures for Riverview Heights Park in 1983, 1984, 1985 to be consistent with current Lawcon grant application. Page 7-10, Table 7-4 entitled "Sewer Capital Improvement Program" was amended by adding an additional oroject in 1982 costing a9,900. �........g..,�.. .�.....-r _ __. .r+-' . a �✓. "�,'.►C ' . .. �,:.... ..�...�y... �. 9S .�r.R""�".T. _ „' ..�....-w...� . .. �.._.._..r�..._.. _ . , .. � . . � � . '_'A .. . —� . . _. TM! CIT�/ O� . . DIAECTOAATE ` , -. . . . OF � PUBLIC WORKS _ �; FA1 L Y . OATE Sept�nber 21, 1982 ' FROM D.P.W. Planning � Jerrold L. Boardrnan SUBJECT . f Resolution for Central Center for Family Resources � P ,14 � MEMOIaANDUM �� :. _ :;�=�._ . MEMO N0. 62 63 TO ACTION INFO• Lee Carlson from Central Center for Family Resources has requested a resolution of support from the Fridley City Council for their application for funds to the Juvenile Intervention Funds for the 1982-1983 funding cycle. - I have attached a resolution for the City Council to review and approve so as to assist their organization in their funding endeavors. . JLB/jh �.: •�� ;. �;� - ;�;r:. ��yt•_, ; • �:v RLSOS.UTION OF �E CITY OODNCIL OF FRID�I,EY, MINNESOTA �II� � GRANT PiPPLICATION OF (�ITRAL C6N'tffit P�R P!ll�Y RFS� WHEREAS, citizens reooc�zized the need for greater family resources to deal with child and family adjustment probl�ns in the haae, school and oo�nunity in the Blaine, Spring Lake Park and Fridley vo�ununities of Anoka Countyf and WHgtF,AS, these citizens created the Central Center for Family Resources, a non-profit oorporation, to provide child and family educational and oounselfng prograQnss and WHIItFAS, such preventive programs are a crying need with the State and County responsibility for hwnan and social services to allay human c]ysfunction as well as the societal oosts of treatment and correctional prograunsf and �, Anoka County's population is 34$ of the outer five oounties and Anoka County's Part I Crime Statistics are individually hi�er than any ore other o� said five oountiesj and WHERF,AS, the City of Fridley as well as Blaine and Spring Lake Park committed sorely limitecl resources to f�d the Center's 1979/80, 1980/81, and 1982/83 prograans= and WE�tEAS, the Central Center for Family Resources is again applying to the Jwenile Intervention �ncis for 1982/83 fundingj NOiW, THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED that the City Council of Fridley hereby supports the application of the Central Center for Family Resouroes and urges the Juvenile Intervention �nc�s to fund said progra�n. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be conveyed to appropriate officials, particularly of the Jwenile Intervention Funds and Metropolitan Council. PASSID AND ADOPTID BY THE QTY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY 7�ILS DiAY OF , 1982. WILLZAM J. 1�E - MAYOR A'I'I�ST: SID[�TEY C. INr71AN - CITY (ZE�2R �✓v��3o 14q t►�+■ DATE FROM_, SUBJECT DtAECTORATE OP puB��c woR�cs September 22, 1982 rv John G. Flora Roof Repair - Filtration Plants TO � MEMOAANDUM ACTION� INFO• We have been experiencing roof leaks on both the Commons and Locke Park Water Filtration P]ants. The roofs have been inspected and it has been determined that the Commons building requires new flashings and the Locke Park building requires new roofing. The buildings are 20 and 12 years old. There are no longer any warranties or bonds remaining on.the roofs. The repair work will cost approximately $49,000. Funds for this are available in the Utility Enterprise Fund. In order to obtain optimal use of the existing facilities without future expensive repairs, recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution for repair of the Cornnons and Locke Park Filter Plant roofs. JGF/mc n+� e�tv os OIAECTOAATE OF PUBLIC WORKS � SU6JECT Roof Repair - Filtration Plant 15A MEMORANDUM Reviewing the condition of roofs for all•City of Fridley buildings, it appears that the two filtration plants are nearing the age where major roof repair work is needed. Reports from the Water Forerran and Superintendent of Public Works indicate water is leaking in at the Commons Filtration Plant. also roof blisters and cracks are appearing on the Locke Park Filter Plant. Oonahue and Associates, Inc. conducted an inspection on both roofs. As you can see by the results of the inspections it was concluded that the Commons roof was �n gaod condition except for the flashings and metal gravel stops. Approxi- mate cost for repair of this roof would be $3900. However, the roof of the Locke Park Filtration Plant is deteriorated and the insulation is very wet. They re- commend that this roof be replaced. The approximate cost would be $45,000. The new roof system recomnended would consist of a synthetic vapor barrier, new urethane insulation, permalite tapered insulation board and a single-ply roofing membrane. The new insulation would increase energy conservation by minimizing the heat loss. Also, the new roof system would be built up and sloped to the drains to eliminate standing water which slowly deteriorates roofs. Based on the results from the inspections by Oonahue and Associates, it appears that the two Filtration Plant roofs need i�rmediate attent3on. Please let me know if you need further information concerning the project. BN/mc �B RESOLUTION N0. - 1982 A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPROVAL OF PLANS AND - ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: CITY OF FRIDLEY ROOF CONSTRUCTION FOR FILTRATION PLANTS PROJECT �138 .. MNEREAS, certain improvements are deemed necessary to maintain the roof on these water filtration plants. WHEREAS, Plans and specifications have been prepared for this projett by Donohue, Hetherington 6 Associates, Inc.; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the improvements as shown in the plans and specifications are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon as reasonably possible. - That the work involved in said improvements as listed above shall hereinafter be designated as: CITY OF fRIDLEY ROOF CONSTRUCTION FOR FILTRATION PLANTS PROJECT #138 2. The plans and specifications prepared by Donohue, Hetherington b.Associates Inc. for such improvements, a copy of which plans and specifications are hereto attached and made a part hereof, are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. The Public Works Director shall accordingly prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper advertisements for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three (3) weeks (at least 21 days), and shall specify the work to be done and will state that bids will be opened and considered at 11:00 a.m. on the 19th day of October 1982 in the Council Chamber of the City Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Public Works Director and accompanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for five per- cent (5�) of the amoLnt of such bid. That the advertisement for bids for CITY OF FRIDLEY ROOF CONSTRUCTION FOR FILTRATION PLANTS PROJECT �138 shall be substantially in the standard form. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1982. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CLERK � L� NOTICE TO BIDDERS CITY OF FRIDLEY ROOF CONSTRUCTION FOR FILTRATION PLANTS PROJECT #138 Seated bids will be received and publicly opened by the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, at the office of the Public Works Director, 5341 University Avenue N.E.. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 (Tel. 571-3450) on the 19th day of October. 1982. at 11:00 a.m., for the furnishing of work and materials for CITY OF FRIDLEY ROOF CONSTRUCTION FOR FILTRATION PLANTS PROJECT �138 All in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by Donohue, Netherington & Associates, Inc. 7400 Metro Boulevard, Suite 310, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 (Tel. 835-1226). � Plans and specifications may be examined at the office of the Public Works Director and copies may be obtai�ed for the Contractor's individual use by applying to the Public Works Director and depositing with the Public Works Director �25.00 for each set. The deposit will be refunded to eath bidder submitting a bona fide bid upon return of the documents in good condition within ten (10) days from the bid opening date. Bids must be made on the basis of cash payment for work, and accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check (on a responsible bank in the State of � Minnesota) or a bidder's bond made payable without condition to the City of Fridley, Minnesota. in an amount of not less than 5% of the total amount of the bid. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informalities in any bids received without explanation. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days. By order of the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota. Dated the 27th day of September, 1982. John G. Flora, P.E. PUBLIC WORKS DIREC70R Published: Fridley Sun Construction Bulletin September 29, 1982 October 1, 982 October 6, 1982 October 8, 1982 October 13, 1982 October 15, 1982 � RESOLUTION N0. - 1982 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR 1982 WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridiey, Minnesota, as foilows: 1. The City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected by this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be specially assessed for the 1982 WATER AIYD SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNE�TIONS in said City against every assessable iot, piece, or parcel of land in accordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description of each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed and the amount calculated against the same. 2. Notice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed assessment. 3. Said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to inspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has been given to ali interested persons to present their objections, if any, to such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have been filed; except 4. The amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and a]tered as follows: 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumer- ated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the 1982 WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the corrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. PAGE 2--RESOLUTION N0. 102-1982 6. Such proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected is affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assess- ment as altered, modified, and corrected, with the changes and alterations herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land respectfvely. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed, shall be certified to by the City C]erk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and con- stitute the sp�cial assessment for 1982 WATER AND SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereto until the same have been paid at the rate of ten and one-half (102) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in fifteen (15) annual installments payable _ on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1983, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each install- ment to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County Auditor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to rrzake up and file in the office of the County Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF 1982. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman 16 A � F.OR CONCURRENCE 8Y THE C1TY COUNCIL - UCE�ES 17 Se�tember 27, 1982 _ _ . Type of License: � By_ Approved By: Fees: Bingo � . North Air Home Association Andrew Aurzada James P. Hill -- . $250.00 6831 Highway #,65 N.E. Public Safety Director Fridley, �Mn. 55432 . t • � Solicitor � Mn. C.O.A.T. Ruth H. Stoyke James P. Hill � Exempt 3511 Harriet Ave.#1 Public Safety.0irector Mpls. Mn. 55408 - Vending Machine Quality Painting & Metal Royal Crown Bev. Steven J. Olson $25.00 7380 Main St. N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, P1n. 55432 , . t� 0 F�DR CONCURRENCE 8Y THE CiTY COUNClL '��S� SEPTEMBER 27, 1982 �NERAL CONTRACTOR D8v—Kc Home Ia+provemenL � 1325 — 42nd Avenue N.E. Cotumbia Haiphts, MN 55421 8ruce Meston Contr 13101 .Hasti ngs Bteine, MN 55434 Niggin Inc. 1220 Polk Street Shekopee� FW 55379 A. F. Vizecky Constructian Co. 823 West 48th Street . Minneepoli6, MN 55409 EAT N Generel Sheet Metal Corp. 2330 Louisiana Avenue North Minneepolis� MW 55427 � By: At Kopecky By: Bruce N►eston 8y: Oavid MiDgin By: Don ViZecky � By: Richard Ro�rley 17A QARREL CLAAK Ch1af 6ui lding Officiel DARREL CLARK Chief Building Official DARREL CLARK Chief 8uilding Officiel OARREL CIARK Chief Buitding Officiel MIILLIAM SANOIN Plbg.—Htg. Insp. � � 17 � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - RESIDENTIA�. RENTAL PROPERTY September 27, �982 OWNER LOCATION OF BLDG. UNITS FEE APPROVED BY Mark Cran+er 6008 - 2nd St. NE 4 �52.00 Steven J. 01son, b008 - 2nd St. NE, �2 Environ.Ofcr. Fridley, MN 55432 Village Green Property 6303-6305 - 5th St. NE 2 24.00 " Management 7900 Xerxes Ave. S., #1906 Mpls, MN 55431 Same owner as above 6311-6329 - 5th St. NE 16 57.00 " Same owner as above 6336-6339 - 5th St. NE 2 24.00 . " Same owner as above 6347-6365 - 5th St. NE 16 57.00 " Same owner as above 6401-6403 - 5th St. NE 2 24.00 " Same owner as above 6409-6427 - 5th St. NE 16 57.00 " Same owner as above 6431-6433 - 5th St. NE 2 2A.00 " Same owner as above 6437-6455 - 5th St. NE 16 57.00 " Same owner as above 6459-6461 - 5th St. NE 2 24.00 " Same owner as above 6465-6483 - 5th St. NE 16 51.00 " Same owner as above 6487-6489 - 5th St. NE 2 24.00 " Lonnie & Beverly Burgess 5600-02 = 6th St. NE 2 24.00 " 6151 - 5th St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Marck Investment Company 1050 - 52nd Ave. NE 16 85.50 " 4509 Minnetonka Blvd. Mpls, MN 55416 Same owner as above 1090 - 52nd Ave. NE 16 85.50 " Same owner as above 1120 - 52nd Ave. NE 16 85.50 " Same owner as above 1170 - 52nd Ave. NE 16 85.50 " Donald findell 110 - 58th Ave. NE 1 12.00 " 6676 Central Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Same owner as above 7890 Broad Ave. NE 1 12.00 " Page 1 11 C FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - RESIDENTIAI RENTAL PROPERTY September 27, 1982 OWNER LOCATION OF BLDG. UNITS FEE APPROVEO 6Y Donald Findell 6634 Central Ave. NE 10 �49.00 Steven J. Olson, 6676 Central Ave. NE Environ.Ofcr. Fridley, MN 55432 Same owner as abave 6640 Central Ave. NE 1 12.00 " Roger K. Ghai 411-13 Ironton St. NE 2 24.00 " 11321 Ivywood St. NW Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Duane Tollefson 4030 Main St. NE 3 54.00 " 548 - 105th Lane NW � Coon Rapids, MN 55433 � Ken-Chih Liu 6730 Main St. NE 1 12.00 " 1309 McKinley Dr. Ames, IA 50010 Donald E. Keefe 201 Satellite La. NE 11 61.25 " � 2425 Brookridge Ave. " Mp15, MN 55422 . Charles Haussler 5840 lfniversity Ave. NE 2 30.00 " 5684 Jackson St. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Page 2 !s; FOR CONCt1RRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - CLAIiiS CLAIM hUN',BERS � 243G2� - 261S59 FAR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - ESTIMATES Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon & Haskvitz 1250 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, MN 55402 �or legal services rendered as City Prosecutor for the month of August, 1982 �4,350.00 E. A. Hickok & Associates, Inc. 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, MN 55391 Professional Services - August, 1982 Moore Lake Restoration Project $1,669.05 • � fTATEMENT SMITH, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON di HASKVITZ ATTORNEVS AT 1./1W 1250 BUILOERS EXCMANGE 940G. f�+11NNEAPOLIS, I�;INNESOTA 55�02 J39-14l1 � SUBURBAN OFFICE FRIDLEV � rCity of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N. E. fridley, Minnesota 55432 Attention: Mr. Nasim Quresfii, L City Manager J �N ►�a�� w�ruww r..r� �o�no« ��tw �euw �w�rawT DATE � � � � BALANCE FORWARDED FROM LAST STATEMENT 9-14-82 For �ggal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley during August, 1982. Representation of City of fridley in ccurt 8-03-82 (Anoka), 8-05-82 (C.N.), 8-10-82 (Anoka), 8-12-82 (C.H.), 8-11-82 (Anoka), 8-19-82 (C.H.), 8-24-82 (Anoka), 8-25-82 (Anoka), 8-26-82 (C.H.) and 8-31-82 (Anoka) for 17 3ury cases, 28 court cases, 7 pre-jury trial conferences, 10 omnibus hearings and 1 miscellaneous appearance. t46 hours). Pre�aration of 107 formal misdemeanor criminal com- plaints, 24 formal gross misdemeanor criminal complaints and 6 citizen and police officers office conferences. (38 hours). TOTAL TIME (84 hours). August, 1982 Retainer �1,650.00 �1,650.00 Time in excess of retainer 2,700.00 $4,350.00 (54 hours). SMI7H, JUSTER, FEIKEMq, MALMON i HASKVIT2 �Kk� Q�� sowwa�� us ry�%J • ,A /�s/ �� .-�.��. r : ,r N �o�- 19 A � September 8, 1982 Mr. John Flora City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55�+32 Eu�ene A. Hickok and Associates. I�c. Hydroloyists — Engineers STATEMENT 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612)t73-4224 19 B h � � . �� ' , � Re: Professional Services — August, 1982 Moore Lake Restoration Project TOTAL AMOUNT DUE -------------------------------- �1,669.05 Respectfully submitted, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES, INC. �� `� E, p. Hickok, P. E. President fNVEST{GAT{ONS • REPORTS • DESIGN • RESEARCH - - _ . . __ �_ - , ---------T----- - - ---- • - - - - — -