Loading...
11/15/1982 - 00012755THE MINUTES OF THE FRSDLEY CTTY COUNCIL PUBi,IC HEARING MEETING OF NOVEMBEA 15. 1Q82 A Public Hearing Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:35 P. m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIAPICE: � Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegianee to the Flag. ROLL GALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Barnette, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Hamernik and Councilman Fitzpatricl: D7EMBERS ABSENT: None ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda as presented. Seeonded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voiee vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motian carried unanimously. PRESENTATION FRDM THE WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD: Ms. Louise Kuderling of the Waste Management Board made a presentation before the Council a.n regard to a proposed hazardous waste processing site in Fridley. Ms. K_uderling stated the Waste Management Board was created by the Waste Management Act of 19$0 with the ma�or goal in mind of correcting a � problem, which has been inereasing at an alarming rate, the disposal of hazardous waste, Ms. Kuderling stated the three things the Waste Management Board was suppose to do were: (1) to find a land disposal facility for hazardous waste; (2) to encourage and help find places that would be available and of interest to waste management industries for treatment of hazardous waste before it goes to a disposal site; and (3) to work ou� a comprehensive waste management plan. Ms. Kuderling stated the ma,7ority of the hazardous waste is generated in the seven county metropolitan area, with only a minimum amount of treatment plants and no disposal sites. She stated, therefore, industries are forced to transport their hazardous waste to other areas outside the State at considerable cost. � r ` �M' �� ._, : �; COUNCIL MEETIN OF NOVEMBER 15• 1982 PAGE 2 Ms. Kuderling stated, unfortunately, this means of disposal may not last much longer as landfills are filling up around the country and Minnesota was encouraged by the Federal government to do something about this problem to see if they couldn't handle their own hazardous waste disposal. Mr. Kuderling stated the Waste Management Soard has been authorized to search out some areas they think would be suitable, from an environmental point of view, and be attractive to private industry to come in and develop some processing facilities. She stated the State would not buy I� the land, all they are trying to do is assist the industry to come in and take part in their goal in cleaning up the environment. Ms, Kathy Moore of the Waste Management Board stated there are a lot of concerns and questions regardir� hazard waste processing facilities and that is the reason they are here to answer any questions. She stated the Waste Management Board visited a number of processing facilities in other states to see how they were operated. Ms. Moore explained the three major type of wastes generated in Minnesata are oils, heavy metals and inorganic residuals from the electroplating and electronic industrial, and solvents, Ms. Moore then presented slides showing various hazardous waste processing facilities throughout the country. She explained wastes are hauled in two manners, either 6y a bulk tanker or in drums. Ms. Moore stated the processing facility is usually located in a lighi industrial park, and some are only two or three blocks from a residential area. She stated when wastes come znto a processing faeility, shzpping papers are presented showing the type of wastes, and all sites have a lab to test the wastes as they come into the facility. Ms. Moore stated the Waste Management Board is not going to own or operate any of the facilities or aequire any I.and, but ail they are doing is identifying land that would be preferable for these facilities to be � located. She stated 29 acreas in 2�! communities have been identified and 6y December 16, they have to narrow these sites down to about ten to go to formal public hearings, Ms. Moore stated in identifying areas they asked cities for information regarding their land use and zoning. she stated most of the sites identifxed are located in industrial areas and other criteria taken into consideration was highway aceess, industrial type roads, and sewer capahilities. Ms. Moore stated they have requested information from other State agencies such as the Department of Natural Resources, the Department eF Transportation, the Pollution Control Ageney, and the Historical Saeiety, and they will be providing information on each of the sites identified by the Board. � � � � COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15 1q82 PAGE � Ms. Moore stated by next June, the sites will be narrowed down to about five in the metropolitan area and placed on a list, along with those sites identified in Duluth, Rochester, Fergus Fal1s, and St. Cloud. Ms. Moore stated the Pollution Control Agency would be quite involved as they would be looking at the environmental aspects 6efore licenses are issued. She further stated th PCA would be lookin� at storage and handling procedures and the local Fire Department would be involved in terms of inspection of the facilities. Councilman Sehneider asked, onee a site is designated, if there were limitations in the use of that site. Ms. Kuderling stated the sites the Waste Management Board chooses does not preclude a waste management firm from eoming into the City and building a proeessing facility in another area. Couneilman Fitzgatriek asked if the sites they are identifying now are both processing facilities and transfer facilities, Ms. Moore stated the term "processing facilities° is very broad and they are considering any thing that isn't ineineration. She stated it could be transfer and storage or only one of these. Ms. Moore stated most of the facilities they visited sccepted five to ten truekloads per day. Councilman Schneider asked how long it takes to process the various wastes. Ms. Kuderling stated, for example, the Oregon processing facility had six different processes and it was, more or less, a continuous process. Mayor Nee asked who regulates the processin� Facility once they are located in a city. Ms. Moore stated the Pollution Control Agency would be responsible for regulating them and they require that the local Fire Department can inspect the facility on a regular basis so they know what wastes are being treated and where they are located. Mayor Nee felt there was a need for continuing supervision and, Ms. Kuderling stated the Pollution Control Agency would be adding 47 additional persons to their staff. Mr. Herrick, Caty Attorney, stated the inspection is done by the Pollution Control Agency to the extent it is not preempted by the Federal government. He felt there wouldn't be a day-to-day monitoring of the faeility, but probaDly a periodic general inspection as we11 as an on-call service. Mr. Herriek stated he felt the PCA's record for cleaning up hazardous waste materials is pretty good, but inspections are limited by the number of staff. Couneilman Sarnette stated, with the potential danger of these processing facilities, he questioned if every communxty wasn't making every effort not to be desi�nated for these sites. Ms. Kuderling stated many are doing ���, COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15. 1982 PA so and she felt it was because of a fear of the unknown. She felt people aren't aware these hazardous materials are present all the time, but the Board's �ob is trying to control them. Councilman Sarnette asked if any communities are actively seeking to be desi�nated as a processing site, and Ms. Kuderling stated there is one community who is in favor of it. Ms. Kuderling stated there is nothing to prevent the City from haaing an Environmentalist to do the monitoring and may even be a requirement for issuanee of a permit. Ms. Kuderling Further staCed the City may have even more restrictive � regulations than the Pollution Control Agency and some speeial provisions they want adddressed. Ms. Kuderling stated, in some areas in the eountry, the waste management firms not only hire emergeney response teams, but their emp2oyees serve on these teams. She stated these companies want to be responsible citizens and be accepted and are willing to go out of their way to be helpful and a good neighbor. Councilman Schneider asked if they had a Environmentalist monitoring the faczlity, if the Waste Management Board would pay for these costs or if the company would cover this cost. Mr. Kuderling suggested the company would be required to cover this cost. Mayor Nee stated he didn't understand why those areas that don�t have iramediate access to sewer or an industrial road wouldn't be considered, He stated a municipality could order a sewer line to be installed or a road constructed, therefore, he didn't know why those sites which don't currently have immediate access weren�t considered. Ms. Moore stated they are looking for industrial areas where access and sewer are provided. She stated the sewer has to be there, even though a firm may not require it, it should be available to cover the widest range of possibilities. � Ms. Kuderling pointed out that a sewer system is necessary of any aqueous treatment facility. Mayor Nee stated almost any city has aecess to sewer, if they choose to run a line. Ms. Moore pointed out there is an area in Inver Grove Helghts that isn't sewered and probably never will be, therefore, they didn't meet the sewer requirement or didn't have aceesa to a receiving stream within one mile, and had to be eliminated from the consideration. Ms, Moore explained if there is �ust an intereeptor available, but a sewer line doesn't exist to an area, it would be a problem. She stated a large industrial area north of Fridley wasn't considered because it wasn't sewered. � COi�NCTL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15� 1982 PAGE S Couneilman Schneider stated he can understand their reasoning if there is no way they can provide sewer capacity, but if there is an intereeptor, he didn�t see why a lateral line couldn't be installed. Ms. Moore stated even though a plan exists for sewer, you cannot guarantee this would occur. Mayor Nee stated by putting in this criteria that an area must have sewer ' service, they rule out a large industrial area where there are not a lot af residences and propose sites where it is within a highly concentrated residential area. Ms. Ruderling stated one of the reasons they wanted to identify sites in the developed industrial area was to possibly get elose to industries that generate hazardous wastes and cut down on the transportation of these materials. Ms. Kuderling pointed out these sites are all very preliminary and, as they receive more deta�led information, they may narrow or change. Councilman Sehneider questioned why this criteria was used regarding the availability of sewer. Ms, Moore stated there is no requirement that she knows that a city must put in a sewer line where there is a proposed industrial development. She stated there may be areas where a eity is planning on the sewer being extended, however, when it comes to putting in a sewer for this type of facility, the posslbility may beeome vague and, therefore, the Board is not interested in identifying these areas. Councilman Shcneider asked if the City wouldn't have an obligation to provade amprovements when a development cames in and they are willing to pay the costs. Mr, Herrick, City Attorney, stated if a developer was going to pay 1�0$ af � the cost for the improvements and the property is correctly zoned, he felt there would be a strong precedent for the City to provide the improvements and perhaps even a legal requirement. Councilman Hamernik stated the fact that the Waste Management Board hasn't given fair consideration to all available industrial sites in the metropolitan area leaves a void in the process. Ms. Kuderling stated the Board started with every acre of ground in the metropolitan area, but they have other eriteria to use in encouraging a waste management firm to come into the State. Councilman Fizpatrick stated what bothered him was the priority in which they were applying the criteria. He felt some of the more sensitave eriteria on how this may affect water supplies hasn't been applied, but more eoncern given to the less sensitive areas of sewer availability and access, � �/s �� _ COUNCZL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15 19$2 PA Ms, Moore stated the Board would be eonsidering environmental concerns such as protection of City wells and waste intakes. She stated all the Board is doing now is identifying fairly large areas, and in terms of a waste management firm coming into an area, ihere would be negotiations between a firm and the city to find a suitable area. Ms. Moore stated the areas identified are based on the eity's zonin� and narrowed down to the eompatible areas. She stated the Board was also � interested in land that wasn't curently available for industrial use sinee it is now fully developed, due to the fact that in the future, an industry that currently exasts may be vacated or may even be interested in going into the waste management 6usiness itself. She stated she didn't see any reason for taking the area of Medtranics out as they may, in the future, have an interest of going into the waste management business. Mayor Nee stated when they look at what is proposed, it doesn�t inspire confidenee and pointed out the Board didn't even consider the land of the Metropolitan Waste Cantrol Commission located within the City. Ms. Kuderling stated she didn't know if the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission was willing to give up some of their land to private industry. Mayor Nee felt they should be looking at areas where there is already processing bein$ done of waste materzals and not be looking at the populated areas. Ms. Moore stated she was sure this area wasn't designated because ii was in the flood plain, Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, s�ated the area is not in the flood plain, Ms. K_uderling stated this information was worth checking into further. � Councilman Hamernik questioned how much consideration was given to having andustries that generate hazardous waste materials to do their own processin�. Ms. Kuderling stated, in some cases, this is already happening due to the hi�h cost of transporting the waste elsewhere. She stated it is getting to the point where it is more economically Feasible for an industry to treat their own waste and they are eneouraging this to happen. Mr. Roger Blohm, 1605 Berne Road, stated the Waste Management Board`s criteria indicates they should avoid shorelands and their proposal would go along the Mississippi River and Rice Creek. He also pointed out the soil in Fridley is sand and all that does is filter. He also raised t4e question of insuranee for a waste management firm and if the City's Fire Department was capable of handling a chemical fire. Mayor Nee stated some of Mr. Blohm's questions have already been addressed, but felt it wae poss�ble the Fire Department could handle a ehemieal fire, however, he didn't know about the insuranee. � � � COUNCIL MEETTNr, oF NOVEMBER 15a 7982 PAGE 7 Ms. Moore stated any waste mana�ement firm is required to have insurance and these are Federal requirements. Couneilman Schneider asked if there is some protection for future generations if a waste management firm's operation creates an environmental hazard. Ms. Kuderling ststed there currently is a Federal super fund and felt one would also be approved by the State to handle these eases. She stated, however, it is now easier to track companies because of the strick recording regulations in effect. Councilman Hamernik asked if they would be receiving any response to the letters seni to them through the staff, Ms. Moore stated they are analyzing the information from the cities and this would be incorporated into faet sheets to the Waste Management Board. She stated they can respond, in writing, to the letters, but it would be sometime before this is done. Ms. Moore further stated a publie informational meeting is scheduled at at the Blaine Senior High on November 17, 1982 at 7:00 p. m. RECESS: Mayor Nee called a recess at 9:17 p. m. RECONVENED: Mayor Nee reeonvened the meeting at 4�32 P- � present. PUBLIC HEARING: All Counexl members were PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE WITH STORER CAHLE COMMUNICATIONS: MQTION by Councilman Fitzptarick to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:32 p. m. Mayor Nee stated in the present ca61e franchise, there is a provision for a five year extension and what the Council felt would be a routine extension has become a rather comglex process, He stated this was due, in part, because of the need for reconstruction of the facilities and, in part, because of the threat of adverse legislation in Congress. Mayoc Nee then asked the attorney for the Cable Television Comma.ssaon for an overall review of the documents, r ,- l as.Cl +;d C�INCTL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15 1982 PAGE 8 Mr. Matz, Attorney for the Cable Television Commission, stated the documents received by the Gouncil represent eight manths of work by the Cable Television Commission. Mr. Matz stated in efforts to try and protect the City from adverse Federal Iegislation, they are proceeding with the two document approaeh, one being the franehise ordinanee and the other is the franekxse agreement. Mr. Matz stated the terms and conditions of thas agrement have been negotiated with the company and the agreement is reflective of the process they have been goittg through. � Mr. Matz stated the third document is a short rate ordinance which specafies the initzal rates applacable in the system and procedures for a rate change, Mr. Matz stated the final document entitled "Statement of Commitment" was some of the concerns expressed by the Cab7e Television Commission to insure they didn�t have an outdated system. He stated Storer agreed to be bound by this '�Statement of Commitment" where they would upgrade the system up to 54 channels in consideration for a 15 year Pranchise. Mr. Matz stated the franchise ordinance is regulatory in nature and sets up the regulatory famework and the real substance would be found in the franchise agreement. Mr. Matz stated he Pelt this document is one of the best nationally and thinks it will represent the state of art in franchise documents in the future. Ms. Sremer, representing Storer Cable Television, introduced their attorney, Mr. Beatty and members of the Storer staff. Ms. Bremer stated sinee Storer has been in Fridley, they have increased the subscribership, added new satellite services, and have won several State programming awards. Ms. Bremer stated the hard work of many individuals has gone into this � franchise doaument which ineluded the Cable Television Commission, the attorney, and the company. She stated, through these efforts, she feels they have developed a franchise that reflects the best interests of the City and affords protection to both the City and ths company. She wished to thank all the indxviduals involved in this process for their hard work in a goal that provides the best possible service to the eitizens of Fridley. Ms. Sarbara Hughes of the Cable Television Commission stated the Council has a memo from Mr. Moravetz of the City staff which details some of the last things the Cable Television Commission did and some last details of the agreement. Ms, Hughes stated the Commissiop d�.d pass a motion to submit the document with a preliminary recommendation of approval so the public hearing eould be held. � CDUNCIL pIEET2NG OF NOVEMBER 1F. 1982 AG She stated, however, they want an opportunity to submit some other comments to the Counca,l before final adoption. t4s. Hughes stated in regard to educational aecess, the Commission feels thzs is a need that has to be addressed, but was one of the concerns the ne�otiating committee didn't place as high a priority on as the Commission, Mayor Nee stated District 14 asked for specific staff help in addition to the channel. Mayor Nee asked Ms. Bremer to provide some background on the legal, � technical, and finaneial qualifications of Storer. Ms. Bremer stated Storer Cable Communscata.ons is the fifth largest provider of cable services in the country and has a history in the broadcasting ca61e television industry that dates beck to 1928. She stated they currently operate more state of the art systems than any company sn the system. She gointed out they have more than 35 plus channel systems now operating, and have plans for upgradxng their system by January, 1983. Ms. Aremer stated from the finaneial point, they have been on the New York Stoek Exchange since the 4Q's and have never failed to provide a dividend to their subscribers. She stated they have about $100,000,000 avaalable and their lead bank is Chase Manhattan in New York. Ms. Bremer stated the company doesn't have any conflicting interest ownerships in this area so they don't have the legal problems of cross- ownership. She stated they have an exemplary record with tte FGC and Securities Exehange Commission. Ms. Bremer stated, from a legal perspective, they are most qualified to serve the community. Coune3lman Sehneider asked if this was substantially the same document they last revietaed, Mr, Matz stated it was and the change was the addition of a$5,000 cash grant for publie aecess and would be going to an entity designated by the City. � Mr. Mark Scott, Anoka County Communications Workshop, stated in looking over the agreement the concerns the Workshop had in regard to the equipment have been addressed. He stated the only point he can come up with is regarding the equivalent cash grant in the agreement, He suggested a change in the time period so equipment can be awarded within one month and maney available so it can be put to immediate use. Ms. Sremer stated this deeision is not totally Storer's, but 6y mutual consent with the City. She stated she didn't ob�eet to the idea, but didn't want to be in violation of the ordinance, however, somE language may be inserted that they would make their best efforts to reach certification within one month. Mayor Nee asked about the grant for public access. Ms. Bremer stated the company would make those funds available and write a check to whom the City indicates within 30 days of the City's decision. � a��`r' n±`� .N , J (;,�� COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15. 1q82 PA MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing. Seconded by Cauncilman Schneider. I7pon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing elosed at 70:05 p.m. Mr, Beatty, attorney representing Storer, asked if xt was possible to have the first reading of the ordinance thiw evening. He felt the issues are pretty well resolved and if anything is left at all, it was technical in nature, � Mayor Nee stated he feli the requesi was out of order as it wasn�t on the agenda and that the Council normally doesn't have a first reading the same evening of the public hearing and is not convineed there is an urgent need. �Li[7S��7si� RESOLUTION N0. 100-1982 OPPOSING THE SITING OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE PROCESSING FACILITY IN THE CITY OF FRSDLEY (TABLED 11/8/82): Councilman Schneider stated the last paragraph of this resolution seems to state that the Council is recommending this site for a hazardous waste processang faeilrty, and felt this wasn't the idea they wished expressed to the Waste Management Soard. He felt the wording should be such that the Council desires to take a position they don't want any sueh faelity in Fridley, but this site described as Lots 37, 39 and 40 oF Auditor's Su6division �539, S 1/2 Seeton 3�l, Tnwnship 30, Range 24, meets some of the criteria established by the $oard and is probably the only site that is farthest from residential areas and is totally encompassed by essentially the industries who generate hazardous wastes thereLy minimizing the transportation of these materials. Couneilman Fitzpatrick stated he didn't want to see that site used for a hazardous waste processing facility, if hazardous waste was being � transported through Fridley on East River Aoad. He questioned where the materials would be coming from which would be brought to the proeessing site, Mr. Flora staied he understands the matecials can come from anywhere in the State or outside of it. Councilman Fitzpatrick felt it should be reinforced even this isn't a good site, although it may be better than the ones proposed by the Waste Management Board. Councilman Hamernik felt there should be wording to the effect that industries who generate hazardous waste should be eneouraged to do thexr own processing on their site, Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated rather than address the matter of an alternative site in the resolution, a Zetter of transmittal could be sent to this effect, ��. COIINCIL�I�,TING OF NOVEMBER 15 1982 P E MOTION 6y Couneilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 1�0-1982, with the following amendments; (1) to eliminate tha last paragraph of the resolution; (2} indicate that the City opposes the sites in Fridley proposed by the Waste Management Baard; and (3) to add a paragragh that industries who generate a large amount of hazardous waste should be encouraged to process this on their own site. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � The Council requested this resolution be forwarded to the appropraate State agencies and also to the State Representatives. �ICENSES: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's OPFiee. Seconded by Councilman Sarnette. Couneilman Hamernik stated he doesn't feel comfortable wxth the issuance of this license to Glover Produce, Hulbert, Oklahoma, but doesn't have any grounds to deny it. UP�N A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE AS�VE MOTI�N, all voted aye, and t4ayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously. REOUEST BY DARREL FARR TO APPLY FOR FINANCING THROUGH THE MHFA: Mr. Farr appeared before the Couneil regarding approval to apply to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for financing the sale of homes in his Innsbruck develogment, V and VI Additions, Mr. Farr siated the MHFA will select developers they think meet all their criteria and those developers will receive commitments for buyer financing. He stated this Ageney plans to sell $70,00O,O�o in bonds to � assist first-time home buyers or those who haven't owned a home for three years. Mr. Farr stated the loans would be closed by a title company and funds coming through the MHFA through a trustee, and they will be conventional 30 year mortgages and not assumable, Mr. Farr stated he is not asking Council to ohange the design or plans of the Innsbruck development and the character of the development wouldn't change, but only make the housing more afforda6le through the MHFA. He stated there are ineome restrictions potential buyers must meet in or@er to be considered for these mortgages. Mr. Farr stated he didn't know if his development would 6e seleeted, but felt it does meet the criteria and, in order for him to apply, he needs a letter of concurrence f'rom the City. � �-, � : ^ry �, t „, �_�� COU�+jCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15t 1982 PAGE 12 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the Public Works Director to send z letter to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in support of the Farr Development. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick, Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. REQUEST BY SYLVESTER FORMEY 563� ALDRICH AVENUE SOUSH�MSNNEAPOLIS 55u19 RE• POSSIBLE REZONING AT 83RD AND UNIVERSITY AVENUES: Mr. Sylvester Formey appeared before the Council regarding property at 83rd and University owned by Mr, W111iam Barbush. Mr. Formey stated they are proposing a manor home eoneept type of development Por this area containing 60 units, wxth an applieation to the Minnesota fiousing Finanee Agency for financing oF $0 units. Mr. Formey stated his purpose here this evening is to �et the Couneil's good faith in saying there wouldn't be any opposition to a request for rezoning this area from industrial to residential. He stated he needs an indication from the City that they would support such a development in the form of a rezoning, without issuing the actual rezoning at this time, but eventually going through the rezoning process. Mayor Nee felt that Mr. Flarmey should apply for the rezoning and go thraugh the process so this matter could be heard before the Planning Commission and the public and they could voice their opinions regarding a rezoning for this area. Mr. �ureshi, City Manager, advised Mr. Formey that the rezoning process takes about three months. ESTIMATES: MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to approve the estimates as submitted. Herrick & Newman, P. A, 6279 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55�73z Invoice No. 1339 for services rendered as City Attorney for the month of October, 19$2 Invoice No. 1340 dated November 4, 1982 for for services rendered (Re: Fridley Plaza Partnership Project Industrial Revenue Bonds-- Haggerty) $3,535.00 $'�,750.D0 $7,285.00 Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � � � � � COUNCIL MEETrNG OF NOVEMBER 15 1982 �� � � PAGE 13 MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to ad,7ourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Sehneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unammously and the Public Hearing Meeting of the Fridley City Council of November 15, 7982 adjourned at 11:02 p. m. Respectfully Js'ubmitted, Ca ole��H da� "��4����✓ Secretary to the City Council Approved: November 22, 1982 rt�F)� �{i. V � � �� � �,r�� �, ,��__ ��� 1 4lilliam,� . Nee Mayor