The URL can be used to link to this page

06/06/1983 - 5238FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETIN6 PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: June 6. 1983 NAME ADDRESS - ITEM NUMBER ______________________________________________________________________________________________=i �� .fll_ 7C n, �! � .�t'�,.,�v..p� � I h��% �i�.�eY %1iv . 1 I 0 _ �, 3 �.�e , -.Q 1 � .� � �r� � � � � �� ,� ��. ' = -.�'�^--L-� �9/� t� �� r' T �f%T � � , � — i� /' FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL Jure 6, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. Follawing are the "ACTIONS TAKF.�1° by the Administration for your infornnation. ; • �C��/; • ,� 1,; �M Cbntinued Board of Review Meeting, May 16, 1983 Minutes Approved City Council Meeting, May 16, 1983 Minutes Approved AI�OPTION OF � Added Item: Consideration of Fireworks Permit for '49ers Celebration � • � �� • ��.14 � M�• : (Representative fram VFW will be present to request Gan�ling Ordinance) Staff to prepare Ordinance for Council consideration POLICE DEPT.—ACTION TAKEN; Ordinance Drafted for consideration by council on 6-20-83. , (Consideration of Any Other Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes) i 1: ,� : : ��. Public Hearing On Rezoning Request, ZQA #83-01, by Frank M. Iangenfeld Construction Inc., to rezone fram C-2 to R-3, Lots in Block 1, Erco's Ac'ic�ition, the same being 6516 Central Avenue and 6501 and 6517 Channel Road N.E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hearing was opened at 7:43 P.M. and closed at 7:48 P.M. Ordinance was adopted on first reading with stipulations p��xr.IC WORKS ACTION TAKII�]: Scheduled for June 20 meeting. ...1-lE `� � �� Council Meeting, Jtme 6, 1983 � 1: e� : : ��, ! l � . �� Page 2 Public Hearing on Assessment for Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer Improvemer►t Project No. 134 ... 2 Public Hearing opened at 7:52 P.M. Closed at 8:00 P.M. sEE ITF�1 ND. 17 -- Resolution Adopted Public Hearing on Assessment for Water and Sanitary Sewer Improv�nent Project No. 136. . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Public Hearing opened at 8:00 P.M. Closed at 8:02 P.M. SEE ITF��1 N�. 18 — Resolution adopted Public Hearing on Assessment for Street I�rove�ment Projects ST. 1982-1 and ST. 1982-2 . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 A Public Hearing opened at 8:02 P.M. Closed at 8:08 P.M. Mr. Ralph Skinner present regarding access to his property. �SEE ITII�1 AD. 19 -- Resolution adopted Public Hearing on amendments to Certain Sections of the City Qzarter: Sections 2.03, 2.05, 8.04 & 8.05. .. 5- 5 B Public hearing opened at 8:50 P.M. Closed at 8:55 P.M. SEE ITII�I No. 9-- Ordinance ac7opted on first reading . � : �� Tabled Item fram Appeals Canmission Minutes of February 15, 1983. Variance to Increase Aeight of a fence fram 7 feet to 10 feet, by Ing Siverts 850 Siverts Lane (Tabled 5/16/83) . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 B Approved variance with stipulation PUBLIC WORKS AGTION TAKEN: Inforn�ed Mr. Siverts of Council approval with stipulation � ti tbuncil Meeting, June 6, 1983 • � : �,i�, �. � � _ z• Page 3 Consic3eration of a Resolution Requesting U.S. Corp of Engineers Inspection of Ei�ergency Levee within the City of Fridley. (Tabled 5/16/83). . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 D Resolution No. 51-1983 adopted PUBLIC WDRKS ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded with inspec- � tion 1��pp�intment to Energy Catmission (Tabled 5/16/83 ).... 8 �p�ointment tabled �t�r,T� Wp� AGTION TAKF'n?- Set for June 20 Agenda �� = 1�1;�,. Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Amending the City Ct�arter of the City of Fridley (City Code Section F Misc.) (2.03, 2.05, 8.04 and 8.05) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ordinance adopted on first reading PUSLIC W�RKS ACTION TAKEN: Put ordinance on next agenda for consideration of second reading 0 . . . 9 - 9 B Receiving Letter fram Walt Stanaalt, Qzairn�an of the Charter C�nission and Consideration of setting! a Public Hearing on Amended Section 3.07 of the Fric�Iey City C�arter for July 11, 1983 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 A Council set public hearing for July 11, 1983 pr�r,T� WpRKS ACTION TAKEL4: Made arrangemerits for public hearing on July 11, 1983 � -r Council Meeting, June 6, 1983 �I�1. " 1,I�, ! � � . �• Page 4 Receiving Criarter Canmission Minutes of April 21, 1983 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11 D I clzarter Comnission Recomner►dation: Set '�Public Hearing for July 11, 1983 on amended . !,Sections of the City Qzarter: Sections 6.01. '6.02 and 6.04 Council Action Needed: Consideration of Recomrnendation ' �arter C�nission minutes received. Hearing set for July 11, 1983 FS�BLIC WORKS ACTION TAKEN: Made arrang�nents for public hearing on July 11, 1983 Receiving Planning Catsnission Minutes of Mayl8, 1983 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12-12U A. Rezoning Request, SAV #83-03, by L. Robert Erickson, to Rezone From R-1 to R-3 for a 14-unit oondominitun at 1133-1145 Mississip�i Street N. E . ................................... 12-12G PlanninQ Comnission Recoim►endation: Denial & 12K-12M Council Action Needed: Set Public Hearing for July 11, 1983 Council set public hearing for July 11, 1983. $i��,IC WURKS ACTION TAKEN: Made arrang�nents for public hearing on July 11, 1983 B. Lot Split Request, L.S. #83-01, by Margaret Seeger. 1586 Clsborne Road and 7650 Lalce- side Road) .......................................12Cr-12H ,�.annina Comnission Reco�anendation: approval & 12N-12P with stipulations. �ouncil Action Needed: Consideration of reco�mendation. Qouncil approved lot split with stipulations PUBLIC WORKS—AC'rION TAKII�i: Informed applicant of Coun�sl approval with stipulatons , (buncil Meeting, June 6, 1983 �I�. = M�►a�,., • � _ �• (Planning Camiission Minutes Continued) Page 5 C. Item from Appeals Caimission Meeting of May 10, 1983: Variance to increase the lot ooverage 40$ to 45.63$ to allaw an addition - between 7702 and 7770 Rancher's Road N.E., byELO E�gineering ...............................12�12U �eals Ca�nission Recomt�ndation: Approval with stipulations. � Council Action needed: Consic3eration rec.omnendation Council approved with stipulations PUBLiC WORKS ACTION TAKEN: Informecl applicant of Council approval with stipulations Receiving Award from Minnesota Public Works Association for the Year of 1983 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Award was received by Council PiIBLIC WORKS—ACTION TAKEN: Award on display in appropriate place Receiving Resignation (Energy Cot�mission). . . . . . . . 14 Resignation of 2bdd Tessmer fram F�ergy Cmmiission received. PL�r.rr WpRKS AGTION mAK�� Put item on next agenda for consideration of new ap�ointee to Co�enission 0 -.: Council Meeti.ng, June 6, 1983 �t�t. �ia�., �. � � _ z•� Page 6 Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Ctianges in the Appropriated and Unappropriated Fund Balances in the General Fund. . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 15 D Resolution No. 52-1983 adopted (�1TRAL SIIZVICE ACTIdN TAKEN: Transfer of funds has ' been acco�lished. Consideration of a Resolution Designating Signatory for Peace Officer Standards and Training (Fost) Reimbursement Money . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 C Resolution No. 53-1983 adopted FQLICE DEPT. ACTION TAKEN: Proceeding as authorized Consideration of a Resolution Confirming Assessment for Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer I�rove- ment Project No. 134 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 - 17 A Resolution No. 54-1983 adopted CEI�T�RAL SERVICE—ACTION TAKEN: Assessment roll is being run and will be send to the County when co�npleted. Consideration of a Resolution Confirming Assessment for Water and Sanitary Sewer 7mprovenent Project No. 136 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-18A Resolution No. 55-1983 adopted CF�t�tl'RAL SERVICE ACTION TAREN: Assessment Roll is being run and will be sent to the County when oo�npleted. , v � Gouncil Meeting, June 6, 1983 �i�. ��l�. ! s � �� Page 7 Consideration of a Resolution Confirming Assessment for Street Improvement Projects ST. 1982-1 and ST.1982-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19 A Resolution No. 56-1983 adopted. c'F'nrr'RAr. SERVI(� ACTION TAKEN: Assessment roll is - being run and will be sent to the County when oompleted. Clairns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 All claims approved SEfrVICE ACTIbN TAKII�]• Claii[�s paid Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21 D All license approved CII�RAL SERVICE AGTION TAKEN: Licenses Issued ADDID ITII�i: Consideration of Fireworks Fermit for '49er Days Celebration. Fermit approved by Council C�iI'RAL SERVI(�—ACI'ION TAKIIV: Pernlit issued Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 _ 22 I All estimates apprc�u�ed �RAr, �� p��ION TAI�N: Estimates Paid �� , - i� �' FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL JUNE 6. 1983 - 7:30 P.M. . � , : :► :'•:� : �� ► 1 CONTINUED BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING. MAY 16. 1983 CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MAY 16. 1983 _1�' �► 1 : ►1' �' ► �i :11 �► . (REPRESENTATIVE FROM VFW WILL BE PRESENT TO REQUEST GAMBLING ORDINANCE) (CONSIDERATION OF ANY OTHER ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA - 15 MINUTES) � %' ■ :► ► PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING REQUEST, ZOA #83-01. BY FRANK M, LANGENFELD CONSTRUCTION INC.. TO REZONE FROM C-2 TO R-3. LOTS IN BLOCK 1. ERCO'S ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 6516 CENTRAL AVENUE ANO 6501 AND 6517 CHANNEL ROAD N . E . . . . . . . . . . . . .• . . . . . 1 - 1 E _ � rH�t c ' J� ■ :i ► •► ► � PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR WATER. SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 134 ... Z IPUBLtC NEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER (MPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 136. . . . . . . . . . . . 3 PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST . 1982-1 AND ST . 1982-2 . . . . . . . . . . . 4 — 4 A PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE CITY CHARTER: $ECTIONS 2,03. 2.05. 8.04 8 8.05. .. 5- 5 B � ! : ► �c�, TABLE� ��EM FRQM APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 15. 1983. VARIANCE TO INCREASE HEIGHT � OF A FENCE FROM 7 FEET TO 10 FEET, BY ING SIVERTS, 850 SIVERTS LANE (TAB�ED 5/16/83). . . . . . . . : . . . 6 — 6 B OUNCIL MEETING. �UNE 6. 1983 I 1 : ► � �i ► � � PAGE 3 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION REQUESTING U.S. CORP OF ENGINEERS INSPECTION OF EMERGENCY LEVEE WITHIN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. (TABLED 5/16/83). . . . . . . �. . . 7 - 7 D APPOINTMENT TO ENERGY COMMISSION (TABLED 5/16/83). ... 8 ► � : ► CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CHARTER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY (CITY CODE SECTION F MISC.) (2.03, 2.05. 8.04 AN D 8 . 05 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 B RECEIVING LETTER FROM WALT STARWALT. CHAIRMAN OF THE CHARTER COMMISSIOM AND CONSIDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDED SECTION 3.07 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER FOR JULY 11, 1983 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 A 0 0 ir • I � \�� i � �l ► � RECEIVING CHARTER COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 21, 1983 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 11 - 11 D �HARTER COMMiSSION RECOM,MENDATION: SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR �ULY 11. 1983 ON AMENDED SECTIONS OF THE CITY CHARTER: SECTIONS 6.01. 6.02 AND 6.04 GOUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: CONSlDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION RECEIVING PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 18 , 1983 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12 U A. REZONING REQUEST, SAV #83-03. BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON, TO REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3 FOR A 14-UNIT CONDOMINIUM AT 1133-1145 MISSiSSIPPI STREET N. E . ................................... 12-12G PtANNINC COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DENIAL b 12K-12M �OUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: SET PUBLIC HEARING FoR JULY 11, 1983 B. LOT SPLIT REQUEST. L.S. #83-01. BY MARGARET SEEGER, 1586 OSBORNE ROAD AND 7650 LAKE- SIDE ROAD) .......................................12G-12H P�ANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL b 12N-12P WITH STIPULATIONS. COUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION. � 1�� 1 �► ► � (PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CONTINUED) C. ITEM FROM APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF . MAY 10, 1983: VARIANCE TO INCREASE TH� LOT COVERAGE 40y To 45.63% TO ALLOW AN ADDITION BETWEEN 7702 AND 7770 RANCHER'S ROAD N,E.. BY ELO ENGINEERING ...............................12Q-12U �PPEALS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION; APPROVAL WITH STIPULATIONS, COUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: CONSIDERATION RECOMMENDATION RECEIVIN6 AWARO FROM MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION FOR THE YEAR OF 1983 . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 RECEIVING RESIGNATION iENERGY COMMISSION). . . . . . . . 14 y ��....�� ►�+1��►��•s� ► � � ► •► ► � CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGES IN THE APPROPRIATED AND UNAPPROPRIATED - FUND BALANCES IN THE GENERAL FUND. . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 15 D CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING SIGNATORY FOR PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING (POST) RE 1 MBURSEMENT MONEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 C CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONFIRMlNG ASSESSMENT. FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVE- MENT PROJECT N0. 134 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 - 17 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESQL�T�ON CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER At�Q SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No . 136 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18 A .I r �L� • t :•; i� � i �� , r. � � �: • � • The continued meeting of the Board of RevieW �as called to order at 7:10 p. m. by Mayor Nee. � ;� MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Barnette, Councilman Schneider, Couneilman Hamernik and Councilman Fitzpatrick MEMBERS ABSENT: None The Board of Revfew took aetion regarding the following properties: 2�� Elv Street: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated this property was again reviewed and it is probably the largest and best home in the neighborhood, it is overdeveloped Por the area, therefore, it is recommended the estimated market value be reduced from �80,700 to �78,600. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatriek to reduce the estimated market value for the property at 233 Ely Street from �80,700 to �78,600. Seconded by Couneilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6�28 Dellwood Drive: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated he spoke with the owner of thfs property, Mr. Anderson, and he �,as comfortable with the value placed on the property. 7u50 Rice Creek Road: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated the staff's recommendation would be not to reduce the value placed on this property. He stated the property Was reviewed and eomparisons made with similar homes. Mr. Madsen stated Mr. Singer felt the value of the property should be what he paid for it in 1982 Which Was �57,200 and the value place on the property Was �65,100. Mr. Madsen pointed out there were some unique circumstances When Mr. Singer bought the property, as he paid eash to the mortgage, and it was felt he received an exeeptionally good deal. Mr. Singer stated he felt one of the most legitimate ways to make an appraisal is by the latest sale price of the home. Mr. Singer pointed out another Way is for the appraiser to inspect the house and make a judgment on hoW much it is valued based on comparable properties in that area. He stated if they are not able to get inside the house, they m�y just boost up the value appropriate With real estate increases in that year. Mr. Singer stated the house was va].ued at $29,000 in 1g74 and now only nine years later it is Worth over �65,000 and he is not sure property values have gone up that much. Mr. Singer stated placing the value at �65,�00 is over 100;� of the price he paid for the property in 1982, therefore, he requested a 21 to 22� reduction. BOARI� OF REVIEW MEETLNG NAY 16. 198� ' pAGE 2 Councilman Schneider asked What price he could sell the home for today. l9r. Singer stated he doesn't intend to aell the home, and felt the value should be at �57,200. Mayor Nee stated he Would feel more comfortable if the County Frould review this case as they do have experts in the field. 6654 East River Road: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated they reviewed and inspected thfs property and depreciation had been deducted for the location on East River Road but not for the location of the bathroom facilities in the basement. Mr. Madsen stated he felt, in the general market, there may be some resistance to the location of these faeilities and in comparison with other similar homes, it Would be appropriate to reduce the value $1,700. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatriek to concur with the Assessor's Off ice to reduce the estimated market value for the property at 6654 East River Road by $1,700 from $36,700 to �35,000. Seconded by Couneilman Barnette. Upon a voiee vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ]�'� 6�rd Wav: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated they have reviewed other properties located on this street and although a number of properties are valued higher, most of them are loWer. Mr. Madsen stated the differenee in the value is because of the age of the property, as this home is about 16 years newer. Mr. Madsen stated the depreciation applied to this home, eompared with the older homes, does make differenee in the value. Mr. Rroll, 123 63rd Way, distributed copies of information regarding a comparison of other properties in the area. Mr. Rroll stated he felt the value of his property was out of line with the homes in the immediate neighborhood and it �►as out of line With the increases he paid over the last several years. Mr. Kroll pointed out the homes on both sides of his property have tWo finished floors, more square footage, and 2 1J2 ear garages, hoWever, the value of these tWO properties is less than his home. He also made a comparison with the home across the street Which recently has some improvements made and also has a 2 1t2 car garage and fireplace. Mr. Kroll stated the three homes in the area xhich have a higher value have more square feet than his home. Mr. Kroll stated if the homes located a block away affeet the value of his property, he felt then that the location of East River Road to his property should also affect the value. Mr. Rroll stated he has had a 24x inerease in the value over the last three years and idn�t want another 5� inerease this year, as he didn't believe the value has gone up 29K over the last four years. Mr. Madsen stated'he didn�t see any deserepancies and even though size and age are both important faetors, the differences in age of this home Would make a difference in the valuation. � � : 1 I / f � � "l . Y . � 1 Y . x � • GE � � Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he felt this case should probably be reviewed by the County. He stated, in driving by this property, he Was surprised it Was one of the most highly valued in the neighborhood. Councilman Barnette stated he felt Mr. Rroll made a good case and Would eneourage him to take his appeal to the County. Mayor Nee stated, all things taken into consideration, the value is probably pretty elose to What it is Worth. 5626 6th Street: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated this property xas revieraed and inspeeted again and the home is under remodeling and there are still a number of items not completed. He felt the value should be reduced by �2,000 to cover those items that are not yet completed. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to concur With the recommendation of the Assessor's Office to reduce the value of the property at 5626 6th Street by $2,000. Seconded by Couneilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6444 Baker Street: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated the oWners of this property did speak With the Assessor's Office the evening of the May 2, 1983 meeting, hoWever, Were unable to stay for the meeting to speak before the Review Board. Mr. Madsen stated in reviewing this property and comparing it �aith the others in the neighborhood, it is a newer home, but, in this case, it is a factory built home and doesn't have the finished items you would f ind in a custom built home. He stated, therefore, a recommendation would be made to reduce the value of this home by �2,300 form �79,200 to a76,900. MOTION by Couneilman Schneider to coneur With the recommendation of the Assessor's Office to reduce the value of the property at 6444 Baker Street by �2,300 from �79,200 to �76,900. Seconded by Couneilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion earried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to certify the property roll to the County Assessor. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � � t �I�_ � 1� MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adjourn the meeting of the Board of RevieW. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee deelared the motion carried unanimously and the meeti ng of the Board of RevieW adjourned at 7:50 p. m. Respeetfully submitted, Carole Haddad Recording Secretary Approved: William J. Nee Mayor 'I�IE �� OF � RDQ)L8R ?�'!'?� OF Tf� F'l�tmr•� CITY miINCIL OF tyAY 16, 1983 �e Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:50 p. m. by �yor Nee, after the Cbuncil met as the Board of Reyiew. PLIDGE OF AL�L�GZANC� • Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Rnr.�: M�BE1�S PRFSII�: Mayor Nee, Hamernik, Barnette I��F[ZS ABSII�Tr: None Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Councilman Schneider, and Councilman �: � �►1 : �� • ; .�: : �. M�;� ; y • • aC � �,► Connie Modig Car�nunity Developement Carmission Jayne Noble Him�an Resouroes Catmission Lynn Boergeroff H�nan Resources Canmission William F. Wharton Energy Cam�ission Jean Schell Police Canmission Mayor Nee presented oertificates of appreciation to those persons who have served the oanmunity as members of one of the City comnissions. The certificates were presented to Connie Modig, Jayne Noble, and Lynn Boergerhoff. Mayor Nee requestec7 the certificates for William Wharton and Jean Schell be forwarded to then as they w�ere unable to attend the meeting. ; � • ;,��l� • v �t �4 •�. J�. �� 1�. : �: . . MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the Seconc�d by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, Nee declared the motion carriecl unanimously. : �. e 1 � � + �l � +�1 t M i minutes as presented. all voting aye, Mayor MOTION by Councilman Barnette to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by CounciLnan Sd�neider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carriec7 unanimously. ��i �,� V� . � M\. M i • • M�TION by Councilman Aamernik to approve the minutes as presentec7. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �!�� •� • ;�1�+��: I�TION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt the agenda as presented. Seconded mONCIL N�'� OF MAY 16. 1983 � by Councilman Scheider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FbRUM. VISIZI�RS• Mr. Jim Bauer of the Anoka County Communications Workshop presented the City with a certificate of appreciation for its support of the Workshop this last year. Mayor Nee accepted and thanked Mr. Bauer for this oertificate. P[JB�LIC I�.ARn�rS • 2, PriRT.T(` I�AR7� ON A PRUPOSID PRO�?ECr A� �• TG-�JA�'F• OF APPROXIMA'i'F•T v � OOO.00O INDU�TAT. DEVEL,OpMEI�f� RE�7EN[)E BpI�ID6 OR I�►I'ES - ET10 E�INEERII�IG. INC. . NnTION by Councilman Hamernik to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Counci]m��n Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:00 p. m. Mr. Irrman, City Clerk, stated the public hearing is for the issuance of $2,000,000 in industrial revenue bonds for the purchase of a building and an addition to a building. He stated it was felt the expansion of this business would increase their payroll by $154,000 and provide 10 new jobs in the oo�tu�ity. Mr. Irnnan stated the bond would be backed by a letter of credit from the Fidelity Bank and Trust Ca�aany. Councilman Hamernik asked if the petitioner could indicate what amount of this bond would be used for building purposes and what amount for acquisition of equipment. Mr. Mark Haggerty, representing Elo Engineering, stated the entire amount of the bond would be used for land, building, improvements, and fixtures i.n the building. He stated the additonal equipment that woula be installed would be financed by a loan over and above the bond issue. Mr. Haggerty stated the awners of Elo �gineering, Mr. and Mrs. Owarczak, determined they needed to expand their facilities and the building to the south of th�n came on the market and they took an option on it. He stated they intend to cb extensive landscaping to the south of their existing building and connect the two buildings. Mr. Owarczak stated Elo Engineering started in Minneapolis and they construct frames and chassis for use in the computer industry. He explained their main customers are IBM, Control Data, 3-M, and Hor�ywell. He stated they had thought about moving to Coon Rapids because there wasn't land available in Fridley, however, the building to the south of them became available and it was more feasible for them to expand into this building, rather than relocating to Coon Rapids. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding the issuance of these i.ndustrial revenue bonds. m[na[�rr. �rrtac; OF MAV ? 6.� 983 PAG�� MOTIpN by Councilman Aamernik to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public tiearing closed at 8:06 p. m. dLD BUSINF.�.S : � Y; : �� M4�u �:�!v : a' : !!+��u �� I�l �M�. • ��:....� : ' : : �!k 1: �I�� : �i�1N�. l�,4�u � � /: ; ; �.�! �� t.«; .J .� • ��►,� �:��,y �I � �� + � ��, �/�;�4. . : 1 �/�:�4- : �� V� : �+� Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the Appeals Cam►ission heard this variance request and made a recommendation for denial. He stated the Appeals Commission had some concerns about this variance meeting the hardship requirenent. Mr. Siverts stated he had thought about a fence along the north edge of his property for many years, hawever, it took him a long time to find material he felt was oonipatible with the neighborhood. He stated, hawever, he felt the telephone poles he is using are natural and do fit in with the trees in the area. Mr. Siverts stated he called the City, before put�ing up a section of this fence, �a toia r��► it would be rather tall and it was stated to him there shoulch�'t be any trouble, as long as the neighbors didn't object. Mr. Siverts stated he began constructing the fence, with the agreement it would be stained whatever color his neighbor wished, and put in o�ver 385 hours in constructing the fence. He statecl he was unable, for a period of time, to obtain any telephone poles, hawever, they are once again available. Mr. Siverts stated, aver the last five years, he has changed the structural design due to the high winds and doubled up the 4 x 4 p�sts. Mr. Siverts stated his neighbor has written a letter to the City, basically, asking if the fence couldn't be finished. He stated a City Inspector did vome out to his property and he was told he needed a variance as it was too high. Mr. Siverts submitted a plan to the Council for the fence and stated he wanted to oomplete it as soon as possible. " Mr. Siverts stated they decided to put in a higher fence because of the lights from the neighboring industries. Mr. Siverts stated he has letters from his neighbors at 16850 Central Avenue and 1340 69th Avenue indicating they have no objection to the fence and has also obtained letters fram persons within 200 feet af his property and they also have indicated no objections. Qouncilman Schneider stated the question is the validity of the hardship. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated the variance must be based on some showing of hardship or unique situation that is attributable to this property. Mr. Siverts pointed out the reason for a variance would be exceptional circ�mistances when strict enforcement w�ould puse undo hardship and strict m[INCIL MEET NG OF 1KAY 16, 1983 PAGE 4 conformance woulcfi't be feasible or practical under the circtm�stances. Councilman Schneider stated it isn't �feasible to build a 7 foot fence, therefore, a hardship is hard to justify. He stated he would feel better if they had a letter from his neighbor or even if he had expressed a stronger concurrence. Mr. Siverts stated he has talked to him and he doesn't want the fence to be taken dawn. � �uncilman Fitzpatrick stated he would agree with Councilman Schneider regarding the hardship and is not corivinced of any hardship. Mr. Siverts stated the Ca�nission's ooncern was this may set a precedent, if a 10 foot fence was approved. He stated he didn't feel the City would be receiving that many requests for a 10 foot fence and possibly these requests would be only where people have swimning pools. Councilman Hamernik stated he didn't really see where the fence would be aesthetically unaccpetable to the neighborhood, but does f eel the concession. Mr. Sivert has made to reduce the height in some areas is bene�icial. He stated he would have to agree, to some extent, the hardship isn't really defined, but there probably were other cases where the hardship wasn't explicitly defined. He stated he would agree to go along with a slight deviation in this case to not build the rest of the fence that high, but to leave what is naa existing. Mr. Siverts stated to c�nplete the fence naw, he would lawer the height on the ends as per the plans submitted, and to graduate the height of the fence. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Caimission to deny the variance request based on the fact that a hardship hasn't been defi.ned. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Councilman Barnette stated the vote of the Appeals Commission on this variance request was not unanimous. He stated he has taken an oath to defend the laws of the City and, in his awn mind, thinks he has same reason to support personal likes and dislikes in the community. He stated Mr. Siverts was a resident, before Onan and Medtronic, and the fact that they put up lights and they infringe on his property is, in fact, a hardship. Cowzci]man Hamernik asked if the variance was approved, what timetable did Mr. Siverts have for oompletion of the fence. Mr. Siverts stated he felt it oould be campleted by the end of May. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to table the item to the next regular meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �� `ApPOIDTII� 'itD IIVE� �NA'IISS ION ( TABLID 5 f 2 f 831 : MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to table this item. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ��. 1�. � �I�aIY�►. • � : ;: � �I?� : t I�i�. � �:« +��\. � i \�\��\. ��_4�4 �i\ V �\� �y� � V e � : .�.►11►. : �� )>.y .! : � =f �:: ��. v ; ►.�f�+�l��+ � �a.��+4: 4 �,� �►. �� : .�i\� �:'�.4 �� : �� I� � M, �:�� : �� M � ► �.� ; r� 1�. . «�►�M:: : /�� 1 : �i� 1 ; ►�� •. ; ►�►I ;,�; � �� !riI'ION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this rezoning request for June 6, 1983. Seconded by C�uncilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . , � . ,,;,M y � �. , , �.. �u ; �,«�. �• ; • r►. \� 71� �� y�� : h � � ��\ ��►�� i. i4� � � : � � : � \ Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this request for a special use permit is to o�nstruct a 20 x 24 foot second accessory building to the rear of this property in order to provide additional storage space. He stated, at this paticular time, there are no plans for a driveway for this building. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Commission heard this reqnest and has reoo�nended approval. NDTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recomendation of the Planning Ca�mission and grant Special Use Permit, SP #83-02. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � rr�� F�y �pp nr. �1ISION MINLTI'FS OF APRIL 25� 1983: : �►i �,� • i: : : ►.« �:: ��y�� a• : : :,•.• e,� ; • � �► �i�+c MM : ��+►, � ► :: ., � G • :; : : `� ; �/ a.��• : a; Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated a variance was granted to the aaner of Raffaele's to keep a restaurant food sign on the roof of this establishment. He stated the owner has requested this sign be allowed to renain. Mr. Flora stated the Appeals Carmission felt there was a hardship since the building is set far off University and does not have good exposure to the highway. Ae stated the Carmission rec�mended approval of the variance and that the variance be made permarient to the present owner and any subsequent owner should come before the Appeals Commission or a review of the roof sign. . douncivman Aa�►ernik questioned the fact about subsequent owners coming before the Appeals Oamiission, if there is a permanent hardship at this establistunent. Mr. Aerrick, City Attorney, felt the Council w�uld be hardpressed to grant � a variance to the present awner and deny it to a future vwner, ass�uning the situation ha�►'t changed. 1Kr. Flora felt oonsideration should be given that the sign not be changed, unless it oomes before the Appeals Ca�mission. I�TION by Councilman Hamernik to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals C�mission and qrant the variance for the roof siqn, with the .•, ��, r ��+�+ �, • 4 : � � : • ; . . . - . . .- .-. - . - . . - . - . - •..-_ . , . -.. .-. . . ._ .. . . - . • - . -- .- -. - . . -. . /: : � �.� �� : �� « 4.� !� ; � : � �.� C �+M��►+ ; �i� ; �+� « 4.1 � � � : � � �� . ► � : +�� ii�!� ►� � � � �4�_ G M� �� ► M�� 4:. �/ • � � : 1� M r 1�. ;. y. �+W; �� :� �v;; .!�� w�, Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this�request for construction of a four-plex includes four variances. He stated, when presented to the Appeals Cararission, they felt that portion of property which was taken for highway purposes, and since turned back to the Gity, might be added to this parcel to increase the lot size. He pointed out, if this was done, it would eliminate the need for the variances of the lot size and the front yard, therefore, the Appeals Caranission denied these two variances. Mr. Flora stated the App�als Ca�unission did approve the variances for the rear and side yards, with the understanding the City work with the property awner to release the property which was turned taack to the City. Mr. Flora stated the County is attempting for the first time a private sale of properties and offering these properties to adjoining property owners. He felt it might be appropriate for the City to have sanething similar, if they desire to transfer this property. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to reduce the lot area requirement f rom 15,000 squre feet to 13,790 squre feet; to reduce the rear yard setback fram 32.5 feet to 5 feet; to reduce the side yard setback fram the required 35 feet to 30 ft. and 7 feet; and to reduce the front yard setback from the required 35 feet to 32 feet. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated there are a n�m�ber of situations where there is excess property that hasn't been used and turned back to the City. He stated the mechanics of corrveying the property to the adjoining owners is fairly simple, but felt the Council should take a look at what policy they want to establish. Mr. Herrick stated there probably w�ould be socne title work involved and a check with the Public Works Department to see what property �s originally taken. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated he felt what the Appeals Commission implied was if this property isn't needed by the City, it should be given back to the property awner so it can be put back on the tax rolls. Mr. Qureshi felt, as part of the variance, there should be a stipulation that if the city can legally provide this property to the awners, they would be willing to accept it. Mr. 0'Bannon, the property awner, indicated this woulch�'t be a problem and he would be willing to accept this property if the City can turn it back. ��. ��. 4��M��. � � : � * � MDTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Planning Ca�miission Meeting of May 4, 1983. Seconded by Councilnan Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried tu�animously. � �I��t �� ' � � � M�� «t�a � �1/� �t�J � �.� � i i� � i : ��1�. M�� 4 �'.�1�� i��\� �� i� i� �� )� � ��. • ' � +/�� 1� M�� : M Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, explained that connection charges were assessed to this property owned by Mr. Zelevarov. He stated, in this particular case, there were two separate connections, one off Mississippi Place and an additional one on Riverview Terrace in order for this property to be developed as a condo. Mr. Flora stated there were a n�miber of variances given when this property was developed and the Appeals Ca�enission worked hard with the developer and adjacent property owners to find the best location and a number of concessions were made on both sides. He stated the stip�Iations that were made for the property have not, as yet, been oomplied with. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the question is if the Council feels the connection charges were justified. He pointed out this has been the City's policy to charge for oonnection at the time sameone hooks up to the sewer or water system. � Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated he felt the problesn arose aver oonfusion � whether the past owner should hve paid these charges when the lines were � constructed. He stated Mr. Zelevarov bought the property and supposedly aII the special assessments were paid, �a ��S�a to the previous owner. He stated if it can be pointed out this is not an assessment, but a connection charge, perhaps the problem can be resolved. ��i�� :. • + • ��.M�4I ��M� � i/�1 � 'yyl�l++ . � M� h� � �� . : �� \ Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the allocation of community development block grant funds under the Federal jobs bill could be used for any of the eligible programs set up in the 1983 regulations for the C'.D�G Progr�n. He stated staff has, therefore, made a recammendation to allocate Fridley's portion of these funds to St. Philip's project. MrJ'I'ION by Counci]man Hamernik to allocate the com�wni ty development block grant funds received under the jobs bill to St. Phillip's project. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unan�mously. � � �� 1� 71�: � �i� � V: � �� i � �� ' �1�J4 1� M*� �M1 � �� Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, reviewed the properties in the City scheduled for the County tax forfeit land sale. M�TION by Councilman Barnette to concur with the staff's recommendation ooncerning disposition of tax forfeit properties scheduled for the County's 1983 sale. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ��. �\. � V�'�'�y�\. � r i ;.� , ♦ �« ,i�1. �/� i \�� i ��i 1 � �\. y�� i\�4� i � 11� ♦ � � � � e �� i \. i:�! 1�4 : 1�. � ' �� r � l�J'I'ION by Councilman Aamernik to receive the bids. r �� . �• Allied elacktap 10503 - 89th Avenue North Maple Grwe, 1rII�1 55369 Bit�aninous Roadways 2825 Cedar Avenue Minneapalis, l�t 55407 Midwest Paving & Recycling CompanY► Inc. 6350 Industrial Drive Eden Prairie, I�I 55344 Batzer Construction, Inc. P.O. Box 1025 St. Cloud, N�T 56301 : �r :r u 58 58 5$ 5$ BASE BID $179,943 .17 $183 , 533 .57 $195,465.24 (Late Bid 11:15) $190,006.87 Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated four bids were rec�ived for this sealcoating project ranging fram 5180,000 to 5195,000. He stated this was � a joint bid with the cities of Col�nnbia Heights and New Brighton and, it was found that Allied Blacktop is the law bidder and Fridley's portion is $52,925.12. Mr. Flora stated, in reviewing the prioes received in this bid as compared with last year, the City saved about $7,000. He felt even though the prices were lawer this year than last year, the joint bid process allowed additional savings. M�TION by Councilnan Fitzpatrick to find that A11ied Blacktop is the low bidder and award the contract to them in the amount of 552,925.12 for Fridley's portion of this sealcoating project. Seconded by Councilman AaQnernik. Opon a voice vote, alI v�ting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 1�I'ION by Council.man Schneic]er to extend congratulations to the staff for a job well-done and for participating in this joint bidding process in order to realize a saving to the City. Seoonded by Councilnan Fitzptarick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried ur�viimously. � ; �.� �,� �! �/1�. �: � �v 1�4 � : ' a.��1l= �� ' :�� 4 �!� : 9, V�.1, � i �,�� .�yf . i �1'��'�. � Y1i��,! i�T f _��f f R,. yT� �f�l f��.:. �� yt� •�N�1t �i��71� • .11,l�l��l'i � : \�1 �\, i �If � �7l%�. � �1l��\% �� !�J/i : \I� • - �ye � � _ �,. ' � _' i � : �i� • ►I}M � �� ht��\%� 71 • �I�. �\� �I� �\. �►� i'v� 1��1 M7I'ION by �unci]man Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 48-1983. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. •�. 1►.�/� r��i?/Y��. • �r. � t1 � �� . / �.\ �� 1�1�� • 1►. �1�1/�i � �y191�� • • \� y�/�� \ y �� i\ : ��: y�l��. �1�1� V : \�: �4 �\� � ��. : \� i �i\ �� Mr � V ; y `.�. �M. .►: y�;.. .I�� MOTION by Councilman Aamernik to adopt Resolution No. �L9-1983, and app�inting Jdu� Flora as the City's representative. Seoonded by Oouncilnan Fitzpatrick. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mation carried unanimously. � ��i\� �� : M �l\ � � �� . 1� �i� � ?�. ��iMl\. : ��V� �� *. • 31�. 1�1 71��. 1�� ' a,N �i� • �v �I:�et7��.M �►/�la. �1 M, 1► M.� M4 • �: �� ► Oo�mcilman Aamernik questioned the oosts involved in these inspections. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, inc3icated there would be no vost for the inspection, however, if it was found the levees neec3ed to be upgraded, it would have to be c3etermined where f�ds would oane from for the upgrading nnd maintenance. Mr. Flora stated, at this time, he did not know whether any funds were available through the Arniy Corps of Engineers or if the City would have to pay the oost or at least share in the aost. Mr. Qureshi, City manager, stateci the levee was built as a t��orary levee in 1969, hawever, the City chose to retain that material and rebuild a road over it. He stated it is possible the Army Corps of F�gineers may indicate ti�is is only a t.en�orary or emergency levee and doesn't meet the stanc3ards. NriPION by Councilman Barnette to table this item to the next meeting. Seconded by Councilman Aamernik. Upon a voice vote, all v�ting aye, Mayor Nee declared the nation carried unanimously. : �.� .! �.� �! 1 �� y�+; 1�1�� : � :_r� �� .IM�. y.� y : y � � ►41 `.�� : � ': .�14�� • i 1? ; �I�M 1� a'v��/l� 1�� ' �.4 G� �;�I r trDTION by Councilnan Aaanernik to adopt Resolution No. 50-1983. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the m�tion carried unanimously. 1 �. s�: MO�I�ION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No. 118Z03 through 133T15. Seoonded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carriec7 unanimously. 1 �� • M�'I*ION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to apprwe the licenses as submitted and on file i.n the License C1erk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Op�o� a voioe vote, all wting aye, Mayor Nee cleclared the motion carried u�animously. M�� J�vv 1�. .�• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the swimming pool licenses presented and file in Lioense Clerk's Offioe for future reference. Seconded by Councilman 8amernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unani�aously. l� 1 `�' �� +� � 4�� \, � V� �r:tl'1�� "a�'� rv ; k � 1�TION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as srabmitted. Aerrick & Newman, P.A. 6279 University Avenue, NE Fridley, 1�I 55432 For legal services rendered as City Attorney for the month of April, 1983 E. A. Hickock & Associates 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, I�I 55391 Professional Services, February, 1983 Professional Services, April 1983 Moore Lake Restoration Project Phase I = $1,395.62 Phase II = $1,279.56 Monette Construction Car�pany, Inc. 2050 White.Bear Avenue St. Paul, I�IIV 55109 Partial Estimate �1 Fridley Canmunity Plaza Project $1,802.40 $1,411�65 $2,675.18 $9,025.00 Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. : :. : : � ��. �� 4 ��:T M 4 Councilman Hamernik stated he received a number of calls from residents regarding the staff's handling of the matter of a hazardous waste processing facility in the City. He stated everyone who contacted him was very pleased with staff's presentation and appreciated their efforts. Cbuncilman Fitzpatrick stated he had also received calls with the same conm�ents . . ! � �: � u ��k• MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of May 16, 1983 adjourned at 9:55 p. m. Respectfully submitted, C'arole Haddad Secretary to the City Council Approved: William J. Nee Mayor PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL . 1 NOTICE is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on Monday, June 6, 1983, in the Council Chamber at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #83-01, by Frank M. Langenfeld Construction, Inc., to rezone Lot 3, and the North half of Lot 4, and Lots 6, 7 and 8, Block l, Erco's First Addition, from C-2 (general business areas), to R-3, (general multiple family dwelling areas), all located in the North Nalf of Section 13, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, Councy of Anoka, Minnesota. Generally located at 6516 Central Avenue N.E. and 6501 and 6517 Channel Road N.E. My and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: May 18, 1983 May 25, 1983 tc� • c.. i . 51A p p. .- - � 'bb�6 ; 6)�0' 41 � ` i9 ►o _ �sob � ; � � � h�u) �i G�� 1� Fos.d , �4�� f �• 4��' l.73, 1B �� /9 �Q � 23 4 � � V �w � � . , _ °v'�' �,o°�' : � � � � _ •� � ' d[U �� 4R .I � s► 2� � ; 4 . . �► ,io i. � • - ' �1! tLI� , � ��p iso - • �, �� i ' � •''� , � (irot�� E 2 . �; G,, � �.i.��c � 6661s `��3 '"� t'�. - - - - J -90 - - ---- �A �.�► c�•s �sA b�f o �a�...o�r.�r+... gr��v �.. . «�' ��O OwerJ <<j10 `` U�oe) � ' r! <<t0 _ � �`b,� � ,. o �,�� , � . . ,ZSS � ��o � �6 � . �,,,y, o ��•� ., � �� t C — . }� � �� r �Z .� 6�10 �• Eo� - s �+�---�;r ,�... , :--; , ,. � � •' i , �� . I 6 600 � i� '� � � ��; � �,,�� se� � �s�o • < <�o � o� . /3 � 2 N 2 ��O �_ t�� 6� � � ' 3 �• ' I6, � 1`�6 � `� � � �� g,�a - � �— - i // 4 1�z•�x' �3j� �532 :1: 4��5 �wS � � � �s'� /� s � � /o I ...�o) � � wl �� t7 :�� ` � � � � 5 � � �` � �s�oo . ! �- 4 0 ��0 , «X � , ��o ; �� <�� ' � �i�a� K�t ' t� 28 ' - ---� I ' .,`� � � ►SfS� . �RE � 0 8 �y .O .. .. 4� • ��s• ��roo _... �� , , aE «n _��Q E ; �� ti «3� . � ,,. � � �� S� «I c�•) � c�19 '�'�� (�� a !��► �o� - « �St� f� � �s�c �' ; /O_ _ / � �� T � .// / ��- �s : . �� o : lA . - .� � � f�� ,.�.�, a,,,. , e /t.�� . � /.. //y. IAr � t' .k, --,,,�, �� jl � - �- 7 _�-. � ��s ' �ss� ��a� - .�+�z 66 T AVE. 1 .� _ 6581 `�� '��e � �o ln�r �� ~ . ,. �', a: Z �.. [LAi �'11r � � � ��. \ � • : �i C � � � i �� ;J ..�� - — G..v .�+�,� _ _ ; -� �. 6537 � /.wrJ T �; a�� il� � � d,,.� -- atl �v 13 �� - �� 2� �_ , �� ,� - ....s �so� t �. : -• wc.� � � ....wr _ ,. �EN �� r � - . . - � �. �� ' - SU87�GT �:'-:�--�.� �:3:,:_ . . - � . - s. , -. - .:� pr, j �''�� _ - . . - ., �:.- � , � 5 � � �� I -� f �i °i . � f ZOA #83-01 Frank M. Langenfeld Construction, Inc. !l�`I '�Ya1ri97 _ . I 3 � + � t i � �+ �� , ��v �� t � <� _ � ' �y � 1 � �,. r � 9�� 1; � � 1i 7 :� �, .. � ---6b b►1- -- - d�O� '^�'111�/H7 �0 1 B .� i � II 4 t { i �� # �� :�� c p ' g � J 6 ,. �t6 , ks • . . � .+i ; � W � o� 0 ,� � �� i� I ;. � T _ _ �' �, � � � ZOA �83-01 Frank M LanQenfeld Construction, Inc. . : "�. � 7 0 � �� . ,. 11 1 � �� •. � .� ��` � � y � � S � .� � � • ` •�� s 4 .' 1� 3 • ' � G�� . � . . ,; ��'�; ' . '' � ' :t. t: tir . '. � �.� . � :�•;; • : i��*r ... : , c•: .. . 1 .;y. . f. . .�: ' '�. : Vi ,i � . • ,.r• ^ -- �� • � ;: d� � . . �' . .`r . . ' �•'�_,, ��. ' � , �. t%:�: : . , • � �. "�' . , r � . . ' . • ' . . s. O . !� ' ' . � UI . i 1► ' '' I . � • �'. � C, r' D, � St ! ZOA �83-01 Frank M. Langenfeld Construction, Inc. — .. _._. 12 • � 1 D � o' � �� = o i 3i — - -------�- � c � i i-- -- — –� -- — (— -- — — c � � � � ��-,si -t ,�-.s -�t� I ! �i � � � � � �� ' . r �=g � '��I °i � � ��: � �� I � �rs �' , t ; � . _ � . �� a; � � i° � I � � �� ( I S, M s ;. . �• 5 I ' � S I '. � .�� '� �y -� i I� � � � � ( � 'M � � . (9 I ' �� ' � . :. � ( '" I � � - � �,. I ' a i. I l� V 'r ► � I .- !�� _ . t - . � � � - M9� � � �� i ) i �! ( y, � r�a � y---�,�, '� �.�_ " ,s-,s � �w-,� n;.: , o-,r 4 . � V �r.. � a ' !_ � � % � � J �t ' • �\. � L � ' -\ • � . ' ' �� -- ' � 4'�__ `- ' i.t ;; � ;II. j � � r � � �, , L1J � - - � , . � , � � r--- G(, .�'. �� I-- JI � J � ~ � � � �rwn � r- _ _ �.: u I b ' � � � ��i Q�� , �. � /�-.b P'4 .ir10 'i� ,, (� � I I �'1 j � _,� �� i► ; � W";. _� � - 1. � , N s •. ; a �� R `� L� � . � ' - � I i � � ` ?� � � �' � � � �, ` -�� . �� , �� , � �.� �� ., ' � � " 9� �=I ; I y ~ , � � � J� � �� 1 � h a I I �I I �. � J � ;�� 'pn1 � 1 I I g�� a�I i.�.s �; � � i+l �: 1�1 � + " l bl . � _ i ��' - — � � ;� . �� .a,t� �t� �: r-o � �� -- — -- – -- -- – � — — --� � � --� - - - -- -- - � - _ .._ --- --�. �� _ � tl� < ��° r�,b . �.0;-- -- �•,-.wi *; -- .o..,,� - - - � � � i ,i , , � J , , ,' , - , � i� �� ' Q . � � �� +�� . ' � 1 y�oy;;. � i � . . �, �� L � �r�.� . ZOA #83-01 Frank M Lanfenfeld Construcifon Inc. - —��-. �� ,� ;� i I � . � r -.b— - � - o-.o: -- . _ p_�4 � 13 1 E fA ;, i y � � � i � c� s i �� i �. {L J � .� i a� d �, 9. u:: u��. n; n ;� �_ t a, r � � � E CITY OF FRIOLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING 0� ASSESSMENT FOR MATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND 570RM SEWER IMPROV- MENT PROJECT N0. 134 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 6th day of June , 1983, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon aTl objections, if any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvement, to-wit: WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROYEMENT PROJECT N0. 134 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improveme.nts is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. � At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of water mains and services, sanitary sewer laterals and services, storm sewer, and related appurtenances located as follows: Heather Hills West Addition 6175 Central Avenua Northeast The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the City Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assess- ment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. � DATED THIS 2nd DAY OF May , 1983, BY ORDER OF TNE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Q FRIDLEY. MAYOR Wiliiam J. Nee ATTEST: TY CLERK Si ney C. Irxnan Publish: Fridley Sun on ___ Mlav lt� and t�tav �5 _• 1983• 3 CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 136 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 6th day of June , 1983, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., to hear and pass upon al objections, � any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvement, to-wit: WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 136 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of water mains and services, sanitary sewer mains and services, and storm sewer and related appurtenances located as follows: 64th Avenue Northeast City Hall Parking Lot Starlite Circle University Avenue Service Drive to Fifth Street Satellite Lane to the North The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is a11 that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the generai area above noted. Said improvements will be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the City Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any individual assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assess- ment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. DATED THIS 2nd DAY OF May , 1983, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: CITY CLERK Sidney C. Inman Publish: Fridley Sun on �"�Y 18 and May 25 , 1983. J - CITY OF FRIDLEY ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF HEARIN6 OF ASSESSloIENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1982-1 AND ST. 1982-2 Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will meet at the City Hall in said City on the 6th day of June , 1983, at 7:30 o'ciock P.M., to hear and pass upon a objections, � any, to the proposed assessments in respect to the following improvements, to-wit: STREET IF�ROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1982-1 AND 1982-2 The proposed assessment roll for each of said improvements is now on file and open to public inspection by all persons interested, in the office of the Clerk of said City. At said hearing the Council will consider written or oral objections to the proposed assessments for each of said improvements. The general nature of the improvements and each of them is the construction of gr�ding, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, sewer, water, storm sewer and other facilities located as follows: ST. 1982-1 Heather Place Heather Circle University Avenue Service Drive 69th Avenue Starlite Circle 78th Avenue (Overlay) 79th Avenue (Overlay) ST. 1982-2 73rd Avenue Northeast Old Central Avenue to the East Heather Place to the S�uth 69th Avenue to the Cortmunity Parking Lot University Avenue to 69th Place Satellite Lane to the North Main Street West to Railroad R/0/W Beech Street to Railroad R/0/W . 300 lineal fee� East and West of intersection of University Avenue at 73rd Avenue The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements and each of them is all that land benefited by said improvements or each of them and lying within the general area above noted. Said improvelnents wiil be assessed against the properties within the above noted areas in whole or in part proportionately to each of the lands therein contained according to the benefits received. A property owner may appeal an assessment to the district court by serving notice of the appeal upon the City Mayor or Clerk within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten (10) days after service upon the City Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any individual assessment un�ess a written objection signed by the affected property owner is �filed with the City Clerk prior to the assess- ment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. 4 � Page 2, NOTICE OF HEARING OF ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS S7. 1982-1 AND ST. 1982-2 DATED THIS 2nd �� DAY OF Mav , 1983, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. YOR Wiliiam J. Nee ATTE57: L K i ney . nman Publish: Fridley Sun on May 18 and May 25 , 1983. � . 4A 5 POBLIC EEARING BEFORE THE CI'!'Z COONCII, Notice ia Dereby given that there will be a Public Heariag of the City Council of the City ot Fridleq oa Mcaday, June 6, 1483� ia the Civic Center •t 7:30 p.m. ia the Council Chamber tor the purpo�e of: Consideration of amendmenta to eertain Seetiona of the City Charter of tbe City of Fridley, as tollowa: Seation 2.03 �.Bt.T� O�pi�s. The council ahall be composed of a mayor and four oouneilmen vho ahall be qualiPied voters. The mayor shall be elected at large for a term of tbree years� (ezcept the Pirst mayor to be elected ia tg57 ahall be for a term of two years). One Councilman ahall be elected at large tor a term of three years ezcept that of the fir�t aucb counciman at large under tbis charter, (ahall be the ineumbent elected laat year� 1g56, with txo years remaining of term and be ahall be considered to aerve two qears as councilman at large to 1g5g). Three councilmen aball be eleeted for terma of three years each from three separate Hards of the city, as designated Delow, except that the first councilman Por Yard No. 2 under this Charter� ahall be the aouncilman having one year ot term yet to serve� and ahall be considered councilman for his Hard 2 for a one year term to expire in 1g5tl. The councilman from Wards 1 and 3 ahall be elected this year�'1957, each for terms of tbree years. IIpon adoption of tbis Charter the citq !a divided into three separate iiards as tollows: (a) Mard No. 1 ahall be the area compriaing all of election district Ho. 1. Refer to Page 4-5 of "Yoting Procedures" adopted Dy Village Council. (b) Yard Ho. 2 ahall be the area eomprising all of election diatrict No. 2. (c) Yard No. 3 aball De tbe area eomprising all of election district No. 3, ?be councilman from a xard aust be a resident of aueh rard and his c�easing to be a resident tbereof ahall cause a vacancy in the oPfice of oouacilman trom sach vard; provided that a cbange in vard boundaries during his term of office ahall not disquality hiID from serving out his term, 0 SA ?he term of ■ayor and of each councilsan shall Degia on the first otficial Duaiaess day in the aonth of January next folloWing his election and ahall end vhen hia auccessor has Deen duly elected and has qualified. Tbe firat order of Dusiness at the firat offtcial council seeting in Januarq aball be the aweariag in of the newly elected members of the eouncil. Tbe couacil abal2 be �udge of the •leetfon and its •embera. The boundaries of the three rarda aball be redetersiaed from time to time by ordinances duly adopted by t6e Couacil, sAd Dased on Lhe findinga of tbe Council that the vards ao redetermined are auch that the popc�ation of any ward aball not deviate by ■ore than one percent (1x) from the average of the three varda. After each decennial cenau� ot Lhe IInited States� the eouncil shall redetermine xard boundaries. This redetermination ahall be accomplished no 2ess than oae bundred (t00) daqs prior to the legally determined date of the municipal primary of the year ending in the digit two� and if the council ahall fail to do ao Lheir remuneration ahall be forfeited until Lhe wards of the city are duly redetermiaed as required by this charter. 3ecLion 2.05 I�CUC�S I1 !� COQgCII.. A vacancy in the eouneil shall be deemed to axist in ca�e of the failure of any person elected thereto to qua2ify on or Defore the date of tbe aecond regu2ar meeting of the neW council. or by reaaon of the death, reaignation, removal from office� removal from tDe city� removal ot a ward councilman from h2s vard� continuous absence l�om the city for aore than three months, or eonviction of a felony� of any auch person whetber before or after his quaiification� or by reason of the failure oP any councilman Without good cause to perform any of tbe duties of inembership in Lhe council for a period of three montha. Ia each auch ca�e, the council ahall Dy resolutton declare auch vacancy to eziat and ahall torthWith call a apecial election to be beld aot less than 45 days nor more than 60 daye from such time auch vacancy ia declareQ. In Lhe caae of a apecial election to fill the vacancy� tbere ahall be no primary election. The candidate receiving the largest numDer oP votes ahall be declared the vinner. The xinner of aaid electioaa ahall be qualified and take office immediately upon eertitication by Lhe board of canvass and ahall fi11 tbe unexpired term. If at any time the membership of the Council is redviced to less than four (4) members� Lhe remaining members may, by unanimous action, appoint additional members to raise the membership to four (4). The order of filling vacancies by appointment ahall be as follows: (a) If the terms vacant are for difPerent lengths, Lhe appointment will be to the aeat vith the ahortest remaining term. (b) IP the terms vacaat sre of the same length� tbe Qauncil ahall ehoose bq lot which vacancy to fill by appointment. : 3ectioa 5.0� LOC�L ��OY�Z �BGOLLlIO/S. ►fter Lhis charter takes efteet� aIl Iocal isprovesenta aball aontinue tor the time being to be �ade under Lhe lawa ar�d ordinancea applicabie Lhereto. Tbe City Council aay prepare aad sdopt a eomprehenaive ordioance, prescribiag the procedure vbich aDall determine all sattera pertainiag to the making of local isprovements thereafter, and such ordinance sball aupplaat all other proviaions of law on tbe aame aub�ect and asy be aaended only Dy an affirmative vote of at Ieast four aembera of the aouncil. Sueh ordinance aha21 provide tor such notiee and beariag in the ordering of laprovementa aad tbe saking of aaaessmeata therefore aa shall be nece�sary to aeet oonatitutional requir�ents. Such ordiaanee ahall also require a petition of a aa�ority in number and iaterest of the owners oP property to De asseased for auch i.aprovement. or improvementa, for the initiation thereof; provided tbat the City Council ■ay proceed upon iLs own initiative Lereunder sndunder auch ordinance Dy resolution adopted Dy tive (5) attirsative votes ot LDe City Council after proper aotice and hearing. Sectioa 8.05 PQ�.IC YO�LS; 80Y PBaPO�!lBD. Public iiork including all loca2 improvements, say be constructed, eztended, repaired or maintained either by contract or, if Lhe eatimated co�t is leas than one thousand dollar�, directly by day labor. Before receiving bida Lhe City Manager ahall, under tbe direction ot the City Council� have auitable plans and apecifications prepared tor the proposed saterial or pro�ect and Lhe eatimate of tbe coat thereof in detail. The axard of any contract amounting to sore Lhan ten tbousand dollars ahall require an affirmative vote of at least four sembers of the City Council. iihen the best interesta of the city will be aerved thereby, the Citq Council may organize a construction department under competent aupervision and -� provided vithsuitaDle equipment. TGe right is reserved Lo Lhe City Council, upon the recommendation of an eagineer� acLing through the con�truction department to bid on any work La be let by contract. All eontracta ahall be let to the lowest re�ponaible bidder, but the term "loxeat reapoaaiDle bidder" ahall be interpreted as giving the City Couacil the right to accept anq bid rrhich ia determined to be most advaatageous to the Citq. The City Council ahall reserve the right to reject any or all bids. Detalled proceedings governing the advertiaement for bida and the ezecution of the contract aball be pre�criDed by ordinance. The City ahall require eontractors to lLrnish proper bonds for the protection of the City� the employees and aaterial aen. Any and all persons xishing to De heard on tbis matter may be heard at the above time and place. YILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publiah: Nay 18, 1983 Hay 25, 1983 3/0/25/2 , �. r �"� � � i f � � � ; � � i I ::� l�TION by Oouncilmar► �� rnik to close the public hea ' n.� Seconded by Oouncilman Fitzpat ck. Upon a voice vote, all vot' aye, Mayor Nee declazed the m� ' caic ied unanimously and the pub ' h ting closed at 8:06 p. m. � ►. :� �. YM�� a�; • � : aa : �• �� •;. � �.� i�>. •, ��+= :� .: :+ l9r. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the Appeals Comussion heard this variance request and made a recon�nendation for denial. He stated the Appeals Cammission had some concerns about this variance meeting th e hardship requirenent. Mr. Siverts stated he had thought about a fence along the north edge of his property for many years, however, it took him a long time to find material he felt was oompatible with the neic�zhood. He stated, however, he f elt the telephone poles he is using are natural and do fit in with the trees in the area. ' Mr. Siverts stated he called the City, before putting up a section of this fence, and told then it would be rather tall anc7 it was stated to him there shoulc�n't be any trouble, as long as the neighbors didn't object. Mr. Siverts stated he began oonstructing the fence, with the agreenent it w�ould be stained whatever color his neic,�ibor wished, and put in wer 385 hours in oonstructing the fence. Ae stated he was �able, for a period of time, to obtain any telephone poles, however, they are once again available. l�lr. Siverts stated, aver the last five years, he has c�anged the structural design due to the high winds and doubled up the 4 x 4 posts. Mr. Siverts stated his neighbor has written a Ietter to the City, basically, nsking if the fence couldn't be finished. He stated a City Inspector did orn�e out to his property and he was told he neeaed a variance as it was too high. Mr. Siverts sutmitted a plan to the Council for the fence and stated he wanted to c�omplete it as soon as pcssible. Mr. Siverts stated they c3ecided to put in a higher fence because of the lights fran the neighboring industries. Mr. Siverts stated he has letters from his neighbors at �850 Central Avenue and 1340 69th Avenue indicating they have ra objection to the fence and has also obtained letters fran persons within 200 feet a� his property ar�d they also have inciicated no objectia�s. Oour�cilnian Sdzneider stated the question is the valiciity of the hardship. lrir. Aerrick, City Attorney, stated the variance must be basec3 on some showing of hardship or unique situation that is attributable to this PiopertY• Mr. Siverts pointed out the reason for a variance would be exceptional circu�tances when strict enforesnent would cause undo hardship and strict � 6a Q��tac'IL �INC OF MAY 16. 1983 pAGE � ocnfornance r+oulci�'t be feasible or practical unaer �e circunstances. Oouncilnan Sd�u�eider stated it fsn't �nfeasible to build a 7 foot fence, therefore, a hardship is hard to justify. ee stateci he would feel better if they had a letter from hi6 neighbor or even if he had expressed a stronger o�ncurrence. Mr. Siverts stated he has talked to him at�d he doesn't �snt �e f�ce to be taken dowri. IOouncilaan Fitzp�atrick stated he vould agree with Councilman Schneider regarding the hardship and is not convinced of any hardship. �Mr. Siverts stated the Oommission's oor�cern was this may set a precedent, if a 10 foot fence wras approved. Ae stated he didn't feel the City �rould be receiving that many requests for a 10 foot fence and possibly these requests rrould be anly where people have swrimning pools. OounciLnan Hmnernik stated he di�'t really see where the fence Woulc3 be � aesthetically unaccpetable to the neighborhood, but does feel the j o�ncession. Mr. Sivert has made to reduce the height in some areas is s beneficial. He stated he �rould have to agree, to sane e�ctent, the hardship ; isn't really defined, but there probably were other cases where the� ; hardship wasn't explicitly def ined. He stated he wuuld agree to go a�ong ; With a slight deviation in this case to not build the rest of the fence . that high, but to leave rri�at is now existing. Mr. Siverts stated to aomplete the fe�ce r�ow, he Would lcwer the height on Ithe ends as per the plans submitted, and to graduate the height of the fence . Mp►TIp�] by Councilnan Sci�neider to concur With the recomQnendation of the Appeals Camussion to deny the variar�ce request based on the fact that a hardship hasn't been defined. Secondea by Councilnan Fitzpatrick. Oounc�lman Barnette stated the vote of the Appeals ComQnission on this variance request was not unanimous. He stated he has taken an oath to defend the lan�s of the City and, in his cwn mind, thinks he has some reason Ito support personal likes and dislikes in the community. He stated Mr. � Siverts vas a resident, before Onan and Medtronic, and the fact .that they � put up lights and they infringe on his pcoperty is, in fact, a hardship. Q�uoncilman Aa�nernik asked if the variar�ce was apprwed, what timetable did Mr. Siverts have for car�letion of the fence. Mr. Siverts stated he felt it oculd be oompleted by the �d of !lay. MOTION by Councilman Barnette to table the item to the next regular �oeeting. Seoon3ed by Oo�a�ci]laan Schneider. Opon a voice vote, all voting aye. MaYor Nee declared the nntion carried u�anim�usly. . , � — � !�►TIpN by lroan 8a�nernik to table this iten. conded by Councilman Sci�neider .. pon � voice vote, all voting e.!�layor Nee declared the mction carried �ai�m�usly. " \ \ v � �� `� L •'�' • � �� ! T 0 `y� � 1'� �yy � 1� � �1'� �� ^ �� _ � t � 1 � i : '�y !' � \U O �d � � � `� M �.� t 6850 Siverts Lane N � •i � V • � _� '-� .� � o �, �z � � �� }� � � V �V � � � �Z _ �- _ � r s^. �i .• �� ai- � � � i � �� I � � � � . � � I r � �� I � � � � � �� 0 ,_ I� � 0 .I � � I � � Chu �` � : � p' lo�a•, � �� 3 i ' a� 0 ' ,I ; o �u � . . _.!._ ...__ F�tL+ r. M�' A Je "� �_, � � t � . 68 � � � !�- � � � � 2 aa = � � � `� 1 �� M � � � � � � I ��° I�� ,�� `� �� M �� v � � ~ �D�� v � v � N ti �..�.. ,/ " • —� � ;, . T tf+� c�Tv DIAECTORATE OF puB�ic woRKs F �ATE Mav 25. 1983 FROM O.P.W. John G. Flora SUBJECT Mississippi Levee Inspection TO Nasim M. Qureshi. Cit 7 MEMO A A N D UM r ACTION I INFO • At the May 16, City Council meeting, I presented a resolution requesting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers of St. Paul District to conduct an inspection of the Mississippi Levee in the R.iverview Heights area. These Levees were installed under emergency conditions. Accordingly the base was not investigated, material and compactio� were not controlled and elevations and in�terior drainage were not provided to satisfy design standards. The Corps can provide, at no cost, a preliminary study of the Levee to advise the city on the condition of the dikes and provide suggestions on maintenance and corrective actions Because these Levees are classified as emergency, the Corps can also, at no cost, study the Levee and provide the city information concerning the condition and protection provided by the exisrting structure. This would also include recommendations to upgrade the Levees if determined cost effective. This requires the City Council to pass the attached resolution. Currently the Corps 205 Small Project Program is 1.imited to Su Million projects and is federally funded. The Government is attempting to imple- ment municipal contributions up to 35$ which includes obtaining land easements, right-of-way and relocating costs. The cost sharing issue is not firm and can die or change at any time. If 'the city called for the formal study it would provide us and the Cor�s information on the current status and c ondition and analysis of what can or should be done. Before final plans and specifications are initiated the Council would have to pass a separate resolutior.. This does not commit the Council to an improvement project, liability or increase Federal Flood Insurance rates. If the results are favorable and an upgrade is compieted, it will eiiminate the requirement for Flood Insurance and flood construction procedures in this area. The existing Levees establish a false sense of security; study of them will provide us information on what level of protection they actually do provide and what we should or can do to insure they do not deteriorate. Recommend the attached resolution be approved by the City Council. JGF/mc gF��IDN ND. ,_ - 1983 RF50LC1TION REQUESTING O.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS II1SPEt.�ION OF B+IF�GFI�IGY LEVEFS WTIIiIN �E Q'1'Y OF FR�'Y BE IT RESCi,VID that the City Camcil of the City of Fri8ley requests the U.S. Acmy Corps of �gireers to o�nduct studies to cietermine the o�r�ditions of the tenporary emergency flooa oontrol levees on the Mississippi River within the City of Fiidley �der the authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as a�nended. It is tmderstoa] that if it is found feasible and advisable to develvp a small flood control project at the City of Fridley, the City Council would be required before oonstruction oacIInences to enter into a contractual agreement that it will provide such local cooperation as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. �e City Qerk of the City of FYidley shall be, and is hereby, directed to transnit three certified copies of this resolution to the District Engineer, St. Paul District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1135 U.S. Post Office and C1�stam House, St. Pau2, Minr�esota 55101. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY 7�iE CITY CDfJNCIL OF �IE CITY OF F'RII7i.EY �tIS ni4Y OF � 1983. WZId,IAM J. I�E - MAYI�R ATI'F5T : SIII�TE.'Y C. Il�IIr1F�I�1 - CITY CI.IIZK 2/2/17/3 1A fM/ CITr OS DIF�ECTORATE OF pue��c woRKs FA OATE �� , qa a f ROM O.P.W. John G. Flora SU0.lECT Mississippi River Levee Inspection � TO asim M. Qureshi, 7B MEMOA ANDUM ACTIONI INFO• The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers can conduct an inspection of the tem�orary emergency levees placed along the Mississippi River within the City of Fridley at no cost. Since these levees were initially installed under emergency conditions, it is adviseable to determine their condition and obtain recommendations for their maintenance and upgrade as necessary. The status of these levees as determined by the corps, has an impact on flood insurance requirements and payments for these residences located within the existing floodxay. Recotrm►end the City Council pass the attached Resolution in orde: to obtain an inspection on the condition of the levees within the City. JGF/mc / OEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST PAUL 018TRICt. CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1196 U S►OST OFFICE i CUSTOM MOUSE ST PAUI. MINNESOTA 65101 REPIr to Aprii 21, 1983 ATIENTlOM OF: Planning Division Flood Plain Management and Small Projects John G. Flora Director of Public iJorks 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Mr. Flora: This ie in resporse to your March 11, 1983, letter requesting a reconnaissance study. The Corps could conduct such a study under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. An informa[ion sheet giviag an overview of this authority is enclosed. Before we can actually begin 8 6cuay under the Section 205 authority, we need to receive a formal request from a legal entity, such as the Fridley City Council, that is capab2e of furnishing the necessary assurances of local cooperation. A sample resolution has also been enclosed. Upon receipt of the resolution, we vould include a study of the flood problem in Fridley in our overall study schedule. A preliminary reconnaissance requfring approximately 6 months to complete would then be conducted at no cost to the city to determine whether more detai2ed studies would be warranted. Schedulfng for more detailed studies in turn vould depend upon the availability of manpower and funds at the time. Normally the more detailed studies require about 2 to 3 years to complete. If you have any questions, (612-725-7494). �Z� S 7� ( Enclosure please contact Hs. Mary Schommer Sincerely, �-� T �� Alan T. Forsberg � Acting Chief, Flood Plain Management and Small Projects Branch Planning Division � �c : � 7D REPIIf TO AT7ENTION Of: Emergency Management OEPARTMENT OF TNE ARMY ST. PAUI 01STfi1CT. CO�iPS OF ENG�NEEi:S 1135 U 8 POST OFFICE i CUSTOM HOUSE ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101 15 February 1983 Division Dear Sir: We recently completed the biennial insrection of temj�orary emcrgency levees in your community. Since Federal funds under Public Law 54-99 Mere used to construct these levees, the Corps periodically conducts a cursory inspection to assist local maintenance programs. A copy of the insrection results were provided for your review and comments. These ]evees were constructed under emergency conditions and connot be certified as permanent protectioneLrCoressstandardshfortpermanent protection�ned in good condition, they do not mc p If you �ish to uj�grade your flood protection to permanent standards you may consider the following: a. Request that a reconnaissance study be conducted b;• tlie Corrs of Engineers to determine the feasibility of converting your tcm��orary ]c��ce to a permanent project. b. Seek the assistance of a professional engineer to upgrade your lc��ce system and seek certification as meeting the standards of the Federal Emer�cnc�' l�tanagement Agency. In an�• event, we recommend continued maintenance of the temporar�' le�•ees for the folloMing reasons: Nell maintained levees have historica]ly pro�•idcd some degree of protection, and,to qualify for Public Law 84-99 assistance in rehabilitating levees damag�ainedfduringgthehperiodSbetMeenlflood eventshe levees were adeyuately main If you have any questions please contact us. Mr. David Disaster Coordinator. regarding specific maintenance recor�r�end�tion�, S. Christenson, (612)725-751] is our Katural Sincerely, L ��-�.��1 �� Fdward G. Rapp Colonel, Corps of Engineers District Engineer FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL APPOTNTMENT - ENERGY COMMISSION $ Tabled � ENERGY COMMISSION APPOINTEE ,: TERM EXPIRES RESIGNING MEMBER 4-1-84 ' Jerry Cichosz 7509 Tempo Terrace N.E. (Resigned 10/19/82) 0 ORDI/uCB �0. Ii 08DIL1CB 1M�IDDG T8B CITT CHIRi'BJt OF T88 CITZ OT rItIDI.BT (CI!'Z OODB 38CTI0� F MISC.) !06 0001CII. OF ?SB C1Tt Ott FRIDLST DOB.S ORD�D �S BO[.LOiiS: lrat tbe folloriaa aectiona of the Eridle� Cit� Cbarter are saended aa follova: Section 2.03 �8�� ICBRS- The council ahall be eomposed of a mayor and four councilmen xho ahall be qualified voters. The mayor �hall be elected at large for a Lerm of three years, (except the first mayor to be elected in 1957 aball be for a term of two years). One Councilman ahall be elecLed at large for a term of three years except that of the fir�t auch counciman at large under this aharter, (shall be the incumbent elected last year, 1956, with two years remaining of term and he shall be considered to aerve two years aa councilman at large to t959)• Three couneilmen ahall be elected for terms of three years each from three aeparate Yards of the city� as designated belew� excepL tbat the first councilman for �lard No. 2 under this Charter, ahall be the councilman having one year of term yet to aerve, aad ehall be considered councilman for his iiard 2 for a one year term to expire in 1958. The councilman from Wards 1 sad 3�hall be elected this year� 1957� each for terms of three qears. IIpon adoption of Lhis Charter the eity is divided into three separate Wards as folloxs: (a) Yard No. i aball be Lhe area comprising all of election district No. 1. Aefer to Page 4-5 of "VoLing Procedures" adopted by Village Council. (b) Ward No. 2 aba11 be the area comprising all of election district No. 2. (c) iiard No. 3 shall be tbe area eomprising all of election district Ho. 3. The councilman from a ward oust be a resident of auch xard and his ceasing to be a resideni thereof shall cause a vacancy in the office of councilman from aueh rard; provided that a chaage in ward Doundaries during his term of offiee ahall not disqualifp him from serving out his term. Tbe Lerm of sayor and of each councilman ahall begin on tbe tirst official buainess day in tbe month of January nezt follor►ing his election and shall end when his successor has been duly elected and has qualified• Tahallrbe order of business at the firat official council seetiag ia January the sweariag in of the aeWly elected sembers of the council. The council ahall be judge ot Lhe elecLion aad its sembers. 9R Ordiaance lio. page 2 Tbe boundaries of tbe three xards ahall be redetermined from tise to Lime by ordinances duly adopted by the Council, and baaed on tDe findicgs of the Council that the vards �l! ao redetermined are �t��h * hAr tt�e Do�ulation of anv yard ahall not deviate by sore s�an��e._�srs�*+* ��t1 rrem tbe averaQe of the �hree wards. �ri�i�iti�4�xiaixe/�1t/K6zl�/�6�dY�Ixt6d/�ri//itEtd i1/�tilti�l�Ill �fter eacb decennial cenaus of the IInited States, the council ahall redetermine ward boundaries. This redeterminat{on sha12 bs as�om�lished no IES.S %tl �` �+ •+ l�nn\ asee n�.in�. ♦n the 7vanllv determine� date Of Lh@ ai� vi�c �uti�i°cu + ..�v � a ■un{�i*+�� n*t��*� ot the vear ending in t�e di�it tro. aad if the council ahall fail to do ao �i�rifty!/�/�EttEa/df/xN6/�lf�t�/itLEt/LiI!/dtitli�7 �ltxitil�[Li6�i/6f/tME/QEEE1I1ii[Z/E�Edddd�/dd/td�rNlt/tE�i�dEfdLidtl/�H�IZ/ ]�/��id/Ld/Lii!/�idt/dtl��llt�Z�E� �heir remLneration aha� 1 De forfeite� until the xards of Lhe city are duly redetermined as required by Lhis charter. Section 2.05 ��C�ACIBS I1 !� COO�CIL. A vacancy in the council ahall be deemed to eziat in case of Lhe failure of any person elected tnereto to Qualify on or before the date of the aecond regular meeting of the new council. or by reason of the death� resi�ation� removal from office, removal trom the city, removal of a ward councilman from his xard, continuous absence from the city for more than three eonths� or coaviction of a felony� of any auch person whether before or atter h!s Qualitication, or Dy reason of the failure of any councilman vithout good cause to perform any of the duties of membership in tbe council for a period of Lhree months. In each such case, Lhe council shall by resolution declare auch vacancy to ezist and shall forthWith ca12 a apecial election to be beld not less tban 45 days nor more than 60 days from the time auch vacancy is declared. /?Nd/r1ilAAl1`/dt/d�t� �ZE�xx6�t/dll�.Zl/1SE/ad�Iitt��/iA!/xiitE/dttt�E/i�EAttLEXy/rl�dd////// dlt�ifiE�xid�!/lby/xK!/1S6s�td/dt/l�tl�l��/il�!/�M�IXI/ttll/tNE/dnE��ttd/xE�. jp the ease of a seecial elec�i�� to fill tbe va�an�y, *�p*p ahall be no erim�rv e�ection The candidate receivina tbe 1�*aest number of votes sh�ll :� declared the winner Th� rinner of aaid ele�it�� ahall be oualifi� and �ake office immediatel9 u�n ��r�itication bv the b4ard of eanvass at�d shall f±�l the unexeired Lerm It at anv time Lh� memDer�hifl of the Coun�il 1s reduced to ls�� than tour (4) ■embers � he remainina member� mav �v �animous aeLio�, aDnoint additional memDer� to rai�e the memb�r�hin to four (4) The order of filli� va�aneies bv acnointment shall be as follows• (a) If the terms vacant are for d�ffereni lerL?ths the aocointment rrill De to the seat vitb the ahortest r�maini a? term . . . __ .� . , . �-i1 . . .�. � - . • . - _ . , _ . .1. . - . Ordiaance No. ps8� 3 3sotion a.0� LOC�L D�JtO��l�1T ltBGOIJ?IO�S. ►fter thia charter takes effect� all local iiprovementa ahall coatinue for LDe tiae beiag to be made uader the lswa and ordinancea applicable thereto. ?he City Coua�il �ay prepare and adopt a co�prebenaive ordinance, preacribing tbe proeedure vhicb ahall determine sll •attera pertainiag to the aaking of 2oaa1 taprovements thereafter� and auch ordinanee ahall aupplant all other pro�isiona of laK on tbe aa�e aub�ect and �ay be aaeaded oaly by an atf{rmative •ote of at least four td�tt�titxlf!/�6xE/dt/x1�E aembers ot the council. Suct� ordinance ahall pew�ide for auch notice and hearing in the ordering of improvementa and th e �aldag of sasessments tberefore as ahall De aecessary to ieet conatitutional r�quir�enta. Such ordinance ahall alao require a petition of a aajority in au�Der and interest of the oWnera of property to be aaaessed tor auch iaprovement, or iaprovementa� for the initiation thereof; provided that Lbe Citq Council may proceed upon ita ovn initiative hereunder and under auch ordinance Dy resolution adopLed by �1fi/i6�l�d �{°° (�) affirmative vote� of the City Council a!'ter proper notice and hearing. Section 8.05 POBLIC YORLS; 80ii PBRFORMBD. Publ�c iiork inc2uding all local ioprovements� oay be constructed, extended, repaired or oaintained either by contract or. if the estimated cost is leas tban one thousand dollars, directly Dy day labor. Before receiviag bids the City Manager ahall� under tbe direction of the City Couecil, bave auitaDle plans and apecifications prepared for the proposed material or proJect and the estimate of the cost tbereof in detail. The award of any coatract amounting to oore than ten thousand dollars ahall repuire an affirmative vo�p ot at least four msmbers zutit6dtxx�ttrzxeiy6x� of the City Council. Yhen the best interests of the city xill De aerved tbereby� tLe City Council �ay organize a construction � department under competent auperviafon and provided with suitaDle equipment. � The right is reserved to the City Council, upon the recommendation of an engineer� acting through Lhe construction department to Did on any work to be let Dy contract. All contracta ahall be let to the loWest responsible bidder� but tbe tern •lowest reaponsible Didder" aball De interpreted as giving the Citp Council the right to accept any bid whicD ia determined to De most advantageous to the City. The CiLy Council shall reaerve Lhe right to reject any or all bids. Detailed proceedings governing the advertisement for bids and the ezecution.of the contract ahall be prescribed Dy ordinance. The City ahall require contractors to furnish proper bonds for the protection of the City� the employees and eaterial oea. PASSID AND ADOPTID BY THE CIT7 CODNCII. OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS __ — DAy OF , 1983• rna.i.u+ a. � - w►ioa �trB.sr: ---------------- s�rBZ c. in�s� - c� a.sat Public Hearing: First Reading: Secoad Readiag: publication: 3/o/25/t . � r�y 23, 1483 Dear Mayor Nee: At its meeting of May 19, 1983, the Fridley Charter Commission voted to resubmit to the City Council an amendment to section 3.07 of the City Charter of the City of Fridley. A copy of the proposed amendment is enclosed. This amendment replaces or amends the text of section 3.07 of the City Charter which was submitted to the City Council fn January of this year. Ordinarily, matters are submitted to tie muncil for action following approval of the minutes of the previeus meeting. Hovever, since the Charter Commission's next regularly scheduled meeting will not be held until September I5, 1983, and siace there is some urgency to this matter, the Charter Commission also voted to expedite the submission of this amendment to the City Council by means of a letter from the Chairperson. Accordingly, the Charter Commission is hereby submitting the enclosed amendment to section 3.07 of the City Charter for consideration at your earliest opportunity. Sincerely, /�' � i� "Wa�i Sta alt, Chairperson Frfdley Charter Commission Cc: City Council Members ! Charter Co�ission Members 10 PIIBLIC HEARING BEFORE TflE CITY COONCIL lce is hereby given that there Will be a Public Heariag of the City ieil oP the Citq of Fridley oa Nonday, ' 1983, in the Civic .er at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber for the purpose oP: Consideration of an amendment to Section 3.07 of the City Charter oi' the City of Fridley, as folloWS: Seetion 3.07 SIGNING AND POBLICATION, AND RETENTION OF ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS, AND MOTIONS. Every ordinance passed by the council shall be signed by the mayor, or by three other members of the eouneil, attested by the eity clerk, published, and recorded. Every ordinance shall be published at least once in the official nexspaper of the city. If the publication of the title and a aummary description of an ordinance clearly informs of its intent and effect, the council may by four affirmative votes of its members direct the city manager to publish only the title of the ordinance together With a aummary, With an added notice that a printed copy oP the ordinaace is available for inspection by any person during regular office hours at the oPPice of the city clerk and at any other location designated by the council. Prior to the publication of the title and su�mary the council shall approve a text of the summary that clearly informs the public of the intent and effect of the ordinanee. The publishing of the title and summary shall be deemed to fulfill all legal requirements as if the entire ordinanee had been published. Every ordinance shall be recorded in its entirety by the city clerk in a book kept for that purpose Within tWenty days after publication of the ordinance or of its title and summary. Proof of the publication shall be attached to and filed With the ordinance. Al1 resolutions and motions duly passed at each meeting of the council may, at the discretion of the council� be published in Pull or in part in the official ner+spaper of the city. In the case of partial publication, it shall be indicated in What respect they are incomplete. Any administrative rule or regulation of any department of the State of Minnesota affecting the city or any statute of the State of Minnesota, or any published code, apecifieations or regulations prepared by an organization for general circulation and use may be adopted and incorporated in an ordinance by reference thereto and by marking the three copies thereof as "official aopiesa and filing them for reference and inspection in the oPfice of the city elerk. The publieation requirements of Lhis charter shall be as fully aatisPied in sueh cases by this method as if the material has been set forth in the ordinanee in full. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR PubliSh: 2/2/20/22 10 A 11 Ctty o t Fridley CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING - THURSDAY, APRIL 21. 1983 PAGE 1 CALL TO ORDER: Chainaan Malt Starwalt called the neeting to order at 7:30 p.�. ROLI CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Yalt Starwalt, Robert Peterson, larry Commers, David Pinks, Bruce i�elson, Peter Treuenfels, Francis van Dan Jean Schell, Ralph Stouffer, Robert Schmidt, Pat Kindom, Bob Pierce, Irene Maertens, Susan Jackson, Margaret Hendley APPROVAL OF CHARTER COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 17, 1983: Mr. van Dan said he had an addition on page 2, to explain what he meant by para- doxical was that the city manager, at the 6eginning of 6.01, serves at the pleasure of the council, which means that he can be discharged if the council comes to a unanimous decision at any regular meeting yet states that the city manager can ask for a hearing , then a lengthy procedure takes effect; he may be suspended with a full salary and ti�at the pu6lic hea�ing and involved procedure is inconsistent with the statement that he serves at the pleasure of the council. MOTION by Mr. Treuenfets, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to approve the minutes as N�itten. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL YOTING AYE AND ONE ABSTENTION, CHAIRMAN STARWALT DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIEO. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON SECTIONS 6.01, 6.02 AND 6.04 OF CITY CHARTER AND DISCUSSION OF 6RIEVANCE PROCEDURE F�R ENPLOYEES: Mr. Hunt explained that there was a na tion on 6.01 and no decision on 6.02 and it was decided to lay both of them over. Discussion followed on the public hearing matter in 6.01. Mr. Commers said he was under tF�e impression that the pu6lic hearing was change d so it could be granted or refused. Mr. Nelson said they were dealing with it as a boardlaresident-of-a-corporation type of situation. Mr. Peterson said that is rhy it was done and could not understand why the city council would not accept it. Mr. Commers�said they are now down to 6.02 and the city manager dealing with city employees. Chairman Starwalt said he needed refresAing on the four members'as opposed to three. Mr.Nelson said the comments from Mayor Nee were that a minority Nould be able to maintain the city manager. Mr. Peterson said he was comfortable Mith three members. He also said they have spent a lot of time on this matter discussing the fact that if the city manager is responsible he would have to have ability to discharge employees; hotd him accountable for the hiring and firing. Mr. Nelson asked about the council becoming involved in an employee's dispute. Mr. van Oan stated the council can pass any ordinance they want but they don't need it in the charter (he mentioned thai the Mrayor, the city nianager and council- �nen Nere present at the January meeting). Mr. Peterson said they were all concerned about the protectian of the city employees and there are legitimate steps for the grieved employee to present his case; that the present personnel ordinance clearly defines and protects the rights of the e+nployee. • 11 A Charter Commisston Fleettng - Aprtl 21, 1983 Paae 2 Mr. Hunt discussed 6.04,that t6e city ioanager Nould 6e able to hire anybody, except the city clerk and city attorney, witf�out the consent of the council and discipline without the consent of the council and also states that the council eay provide, 6y ordinance, procedures for firing and hiring. MOTION by Mr. Peterson, seconded 6y Mr, van Dan, that the Charter Commission sh— al�submit to the City Council, the recortmended changes in Section 6.a1 as passed at the Macch 17, 1983 meeting of the Charter Commission, Section 6.02 as previously submitted and Section 6.04 as previously su6mitted to the City Council for their action. Discussion: Mr. Treuenfels said he was opposed to Section 6.02, mainly 6.02 (b) that the city council is no longer part of the removal process and he has three objections to the grievance procedure - 1) this does not apply after the em- ployeE has been fired; 2) the clty ma�ager is the last �esort of appeal; and 3) any ordinance can be repealed. He felt the grievance process has very little protection. Mr. Commers thought it was true that the grievance procedure did not relate to firing of employees, only to questions or problems that arise on the job 6ut that he Mas pretty sure that an employee could �equest the matter be brought before the city council and Mr. Treuenfels' point was well made. Mr. van Dan felt the Definitions in III. of the City's Grievance Procedure were ambiguous. Mr. Hunt explained that the grievance procedure is not in the ordinance, it is operating procedure. Mr. Peterson said dismissal of an employee is very carefully covered in ordinance. Mr. Conmers said the procedure should provide the same protection in terms of dismissal. Mr. Hunt stated there is very little in the union contract or personnel ordinance about terminatio� and that there are certain state laws that provide for protection but that is even minimal because you have management's right to determine the needs. He said the whole idea is for administration to be left to the city manager and to de-politicize the admini- stration. He further stated that in the grievance procedure the final authority is the city manager and they are forbidden by law to interfere with the manage- �nent of the city. Mr, van Dan felt they should have the right to review the procedure. Mr. Hunt said that is all available to the council by ordinance but didn't think they had any of the termination procedures. Mr. Nelson pointed out that dismissal is a disciplinary action and that can be a grievance. Mr. Cam�ers said the present charter legally says the council legally has the right to approve or disapprove the hiring and firing by the city manager and the cortmission has determined that to de-politici2e that they should not have that right and the next step is if the employee is dismissed, what kind of process is there t� have that reviewed. Mr. Hunt said presently the council does not review, it approves and you could say the the grievance procedure covers dismissal for disciplinary reasons; this is not part of the ordinance and question Nould be whether termination policy should be drawn up or termination section be put into�the ordinance. Mr. Peterson said if the city council gets involved with the dismissal of an employee they are in violation of state law. Mr. Peterson spoke in favor of the motion and felt the discussion was not germane to the motion. Charter Cownisslon Meeting April 21, 1983 • Pa9e 3 Mr. Treuenfels, speaki�g on sectton 6.02(a), felt the rord "lars" ihould be re�oved. Mr. Peterson disagreed; they are the lars of the state and nation. Mr. �an Dan supported 6.02(a). �Ir. Runt read ti�e folloring peragrapl� from the thtrte� of Mhite Bear Lake regarding poNers and duties of the cit�r �anager: "� ��tk shatl perfone such other duties as �ay be PrescriDed by tAe Charter ��or ey laM or required of hi• 6y ordinance or resalution adopted by the � Councll.' � The vote �as then taken on the �otion and, UPON A YOICE YOTE, ALL VOTING AYE EXCEPT FOR TMO NO YOTES, CHAIRMAN STARMALT DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. (Mr. Co�mers voting no and Mr. Treuenfels voting no in objection to 6.02(b�). MpTION by Mr' •Nelson, that the Charter Cowaission shall indicate. to the City unc , by resolution, that they are �+eakening Section 6.02(b) of the Charter, to increase professionalism of the office of city iaanager, and that it would be appropriate for the City Council to exan�ine the process by adding a� stage of revie�; tbat the C6arter W�oisston ts in no May atte�npting to aw dify the powers of t6e Ctty Council; that the resotution is of concern for the personnel ordinance and they are asking the personnel �anager to convey that inessage to the City Council. Mr. Con�ners objected to that resolution and felt tt Mas interferring 1n their judQnent a�d Mith �anagewent. Mr. ran Dan felt it sfwaed concern and Mr. Peterson spoke against the �otion. Chair�nan StarMalt feit tf�ey should not try to re- solve it at this �eeting and ta61e the �atter. Mr. Hunt said the commission had Sane tise to �ull this over as the �ninutes from this ineettng a�e submitted after the May co�ission oeeting for action 6y the council in June; that the council ti+ould prefer the chainoan of the coa�nission be present to convey the sense of the discussion. Mr. van Oan felt the question had to be addressed by ordinance and a letter fro�n the chair Mas as yood as a resolution. Mr. Nelson Mithdrew his �otion. REYIEM OF SECTION 3.07 OF CITY CHAitTER: Because of the late hour, it was decided to table the review of Section 3.07 until the next iaeeting. Mr. van Dan volunteered to review the r+ording of this section and have a report ready for the next ineeting. ADJOURNMENT: Chainaan Stan+alt adjourned the Charte� Conmisston �neeting of April 21, 1983 at �:15 p.�n. :� � ��- �espectfully subnitted, Deb Niznik, Recording Secretary. 11 B � PIIBLIC AEARING BEFORE THE CITY COIINCIL Aotice is hereby given that there Will be a Public Hearing of the City Couacil•of the City of Fridleq on Monday, 1g83, in the Civic Center at 7:3� p.m. in the Council Chamber for the purpose of: Consideration oP amendments to Section 6.01, 6.02 and 6.04 oP the City Charter oP the City of Fridleq, as follorrs: Section 6.01 THE CITY MAHAGER. The City Manager shall be the chief administrative officer oP the city. He shall be chosen by the Council solely on the basis of his training, ezperience and administrative qualifications. The choice shall not be limited to inhabitants of the city or state but he shall be a citizen of the IInited States. The city manager shall be appointed for an indefinite period and he sball De removaDle bq the council at anv ��.�;:la��n scheduled meeting nrovided that at least three members of the �oLncil vote for the removal. *�XI/pr�d�itAEd/Md�tEf�t�/xKttz/�t/tl�i0tld/dx/ t�/xi�/tltZ�Et/b11�/ f��t'/dt/�dEt��E,�/!'1�/�t/�i�[xK��l/titx�E�i/ds�t�/s1tL�t/1'!i�/ tE/lb�tstZ/QEt�t�ll/�itiZZ�ri/��t�6/�/�/��SZt�/H��iid�/bti/ziS�/di��/11SEEtd��/ ZK� ,��z,ri��zi�ne�.r�,�eiez�;cr��ie�a�Kin�attr��ixx�i,�a��i�c�i��a��r�eixt,� t,�a�ai6rrs�E,�i�tzxiati��r�6�zi¢at�i��xi��sz��ix�attr�ex�x�ix�cei�za��i �r�zKirlizx�tz fia�teia�zetizx�ie�d��eira�izn�ies,e,Eia,1eizx,�i,�t�zz�r��ri�t�e ers�zii��irntt�c�n,��ix�,�✓�tixx�i,�a�e�izisxiz�,+�zizE�ie�f�i��rst�izn,�in�a��r��. p�t��izx�i�,�,�¢�n,s�ar�i��a�,��iatiat�a�tz�ztiarizK,�i,��zti,��i6�it,�izri,� �a��iari�r��,�ti�r�izx�i�tt��iarizx�i��zti��r�t�iznEie�z��iarin�aiarr�� H�tXZ/�!/¢Ettdtd�a/rit/dQd�/�tbp�tZ�/4dd�iZt��a/�t�Q�'1/dE�il�i�t�d/rit/xl'i� �ddllktZ /d�/�Zt ►'1�/�d�4tjd�tl Section 6.02 POiTERS AND DDTIBS OF THE CI1? !lAAAGBR. Subject to the provisions of this charter and any regulations consistent thereWith xhich may be adopted by the council� the city manager shall control and direct the administration of the city's affairs. His po�rers and duties shall be; (a) To enforce this charter and the laws, ordinances and resal utions of the city; (b) To appoint, suspend and remove,anv subordinate Q�fi�er �r emnlovee �xceDt as otherr►ise orovided in th�� charter �r�xn/ZH�/t'd�E1lx/�1'id 1t��t�t�tX/bt/xK�/�d�tI,��ZZ/�iz�/Ottik�td/�/��Zbt��d/��4t�Sx/d�/ i�i xl�t�/�Ht�tx�t/bxl'l��hfi��/�t4�iAEd,� c) To exercise control over all departments and diviaions of the city administration created by this charter or Which may hereafter created by the council. (d) To attend all meetings of the council, xith the right to take part in the discussions but having no vote; but the council maq at its diseretion ezclude him•from meetings at Which his removal is considered; 11 C (e) To recommend to the council for adoption of such measures as he may deem necessary for the welfare of the people and the efficient administration of the eity's affairs; (f) To keep the council fullq advised as to the financial condition and aeeds of the City, aad to prepare and aubmit to the couacil the annual budget. (g) To perform such other duties as may be prescribed by this charter or required by him bq ordinances and resolutions adopted by the council. Section 6.0� SIIBORDIAATS OFFICBRS. There shall be a city clerk, citq treasurer, citq attorney and such other oPficers subordinate to the city manager as the council may provide for by ordinancelsZ, ?�E kt� �xxatt��iatit��ziatt��t��Ji�x�z�i�� appointed by the city manager With approval of the council. The city clerk shall be subject to Lhe direction of the city manager and shall have such duties in connection With keeping of the public records, the eustody, and disbursement of the public funds, and the general administration of the eity's affairs as shall be ordained by the council. He may be dedsignated to act as secretary to the council. The eouncil may by ordinanee abolish officets Which have been created by ordinance and it may combine the duties of various offices as it may see fit. NII.LIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: 3/0/27/1 11 D � CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMNISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 CALL TO ORDER: - Chairwoman Schnabel called the May 16, 1983, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. ROLL CALL: Mem��ers Present: Ms. Schnabel, Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel, Mr. Saba, Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Nie7son (for Mr. Svandaj Memt�ers Absent: Brian Goodspeed Otl�e�rs Present: Bill Deblon, Associate Planner L. Robert Erickson, 85 - 3rd Ave. S.E., New Brighton Margaret A. Seger, 1401 - 73rd Ave. N.E. See attached list APPFtOVAL OF �•1AY 4, 1983, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOT:[ON BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY 1�2. O�D�IIST, TO APPROVE TilE' J�IAY 4, 1983, PLAIJNING COMMISSION PIINUTES AS WRITTEN. UPOJV A VOICE VOTE, AI.L VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE 1NOTIDN CAR7�IED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: REZONING RE UEST ZOA lY83-03 BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON: ezone t e West Ha f of ot , an a o ots an , ucia ane Addition, from R-1 (single family dwelling areas� to R-3 (general multiple family dwellings) to allow the construction of a 14�unit condominium project, the same being 1133-1145 Mississippi Street N.E. NOT.ION BY l�lR. SAB�1, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO OPEN TXE PUBLIC i�'ARING ON ZQA lY83-03 BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON. UPO.N A VOICE VOTE, AI.L VOTING AYE, CXAIRWOl�lAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE PUBLIC 1�ARING OPEN AT 7:36 P.M. Mr. Deblon stated the property is located on the corner of Mississippi St. and TH 65, west of Lucia Lane. The proposal is for a rezoning from R-1 to R-3• and would consist of a condominium development where the occupants form an ass�ociation and own the land jointly. The proposal is for three tw�n homes -, combined with an eight-unit carriage-manor type home. Mr. Deblon stated the project has been moved over to the west away from Lucia ]arie with access onto Mississippi because of the developer's sensitivity to thE� existing single family residences. �A N PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 ____ PAGE 2 Ms. Gabel asked if the project met all the setback requirements. Mr. Deblon stated a variance from 35 feet to 25 feet would be needed on the nort:h property 1 i ne. Mr. Deblon stated the plan meets all the parking requirements, and there is the pote�ntial to make visitor parking. Mr. Deblon stated that condominiums can be dissolved and the properties sold individually in the future, so Staff f�ad to take into consideration the possi- bility of the properties being split witfiout further variances. With the new zerc� lot line subdivision regulation,some of the double bungalow units could qo zerc> lot line as a twin F�ome. This f�as been allowed in Fridley in the past. This� plan does meet most of the requirements for a possible subdivision in the future. � Mr. Deblon made the following additional comments on the proposal. l. A variance is required from 35' to 25' on the north property line. 2. Fencing and landscaping is required for district separation. 3. Drainage plan is required (Rice Creek Watershed District has to approve this drainage plan). 4. Concrete curbing and blacktop per standard code requirements 5. Will need an additional 20 foot easement for bikeway/walkway ,roadway. � 6. Engineering Department F�as a concern about the location of the access onto Mississippi St. in relationship to the access onto Highway 65. The distance is only 160 feet. With the County's plans for widening Mississippi for a right turn lane and the number of cars already existing on Mississippi, Engineering was very concerned that there could be congestion and some problems. Mr. Deblon stated there are some rather deep lots north of this property. He did not know if any of the owners of these lots haci any plans for subdivis;�r�. He �stated there is enough square footage to divide, but they would not be very optimum lots because of the traffic on Highway 65; however, the City has to consider any future access to these lots. It was a judgement call that might hav�e to be determined as to whether these lots would ever be split. Ms. Schnabel asked where the garages were located and which way the buildings would face. The petitioner, Mr. Erickson stated the garages were located in the inner court. The rear elevation and backyards will face Lucia Lane. The rear elevation will have a deck and patio door on the upper level one-half flight up. Ms. Schnabel asked if Mr. Erickson had built any of these types of dwellings in the metropolitan area. Mr. Erickson stated he has built in Coon Rapids, Eden Prairie, New Hope, and Brooklyn Park. : PLANNING CONI�1ISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 3 Ms. Schnabel asked that of the buildings he has built,were any of them rental units? . Mr. Erickson stated that since 1980, he has built only owner-occupied. All these units wi7l be owner-occupied and wi7] be FHA/YA approved. Ms. Schnabel asked the approximate price of the units. Mr. Erickson stated the twin homes will run in the mid-60's with the double bungalows being just under that. Ms. Schnabel asked what type of screening Mr. Erickson would use between this property and the R-1 properties. Mr. Erickson stated he was thinking of wooden fencing; however, because the lot is so heavily wooded, it was hard to decide what to do for landscaping. He stated he would save every tree he could. Mr. Saba asked why the rear of the double bungalows would face Lucia Lane. Mr. Erickson stated there were two reasons for this: (1) He wanted to keep the project centralized so everyone could use the same road for snow plowing and other maintenance; and (2) the biggest complaint from the neighborhood seemed to be to not put any more traffic on Lucia Lane. By facing the buildings in, this j kept the traffic off Lucia Lane. Ms. Schnabel stated she was a little bit concerned about the plainness of the rear of the buildings facing Lucia Lane when all the rest of the homes on Lucia Lane are facing front. It seemed inconsistent with the neighborhood, yet she understood what Mr. Erickson was saying in terms of traffic. Mr. Erickson stated this is not inconsistent in condo developments. A numher af condo developments are done this way. Mr. Saba asked Mr. Erickson if he would consider turning the buildinqs around to face Lucia Lane. Mr. Erickson stated he would consider turning the buildings around; however, because of the heavily wooded area, he did not think the buildinqs cauld be seen that well from Lucia Lane anyway. If the buildings were turned around, a lot of trees would be lost because of the dr;veways. Ms. Schnabel asked for questions and concerns from the people in the audience. Mr. Russe]1 Burris. 1150 Mississippi St., stated he would like to submit to the Plan�nin9 Commission a copy of his objections. He reviewed it for the Commission: 1. Spot Zoning. 2. Traffic congestion - exit on Mississippi St. wouid be hazardous. 3. Good or poor construction and cost per unit rental or homeowner. 4. Sewer problems - Burris and Lane are on dead end sewer line. City has to backflush this from time to time to keep sewer line open. A separate sewer line to Lucia Lane is a must for which the homeowners would be assessed on their yaxes. � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE_4 5. What would prevent an investor frvn buying a unit and renting it out? 6. 6arbage pickup - where would cans be placed? 7. 14 units probably would mean up to 28 cars. Now many children? 8. Back of condo faces Lucia Lane which would not enhance the neighborhood. That would also mean children playing in backyard and running out on Lucia Lane. Mr. Burris stated that a few years back, the City of Fridley hired a reputable zoning company, and paid good money for them to rezone Fridley. Said company conformed the original findings of R-1 and reconmended this property remain R-1. Mr. Burris stated it has been the concensus of the homeowners surroundinq this property that three nice residential homes could be built on the property. This would then solve the problem once and for all. The homeowners would like to see this area developed as it should, according to the regulations and requirements of the toning cortmission. Ms. Schnabe] read the following letter from June Johnson, 6600 Lucia Lane: "Inasmuch as I cannot attend your meeting tonight with reference to the property on Mississippi and Highway 65, I would like to express my thoughts on the matter. Lucia Lane has been zoned for single family homes for many years with the exception of the apartments on the north end of the Lane. I do not feel it to be proper to have a multiple dwelling of the size proposed for the corner property. I feel there would be too much disrup- tion of traffic because of the entryway on Mississippi. Traffic going in either direction will be hampered by the cars going into or out of the lot. I purchased this home with the belief that this would remain a single family area, and I would like to have it remain so so that my property values will not he affected. We have a lot of extra traffic from the apartments and the Knights of Columbus Hall at the north end." Mr. Clarence Timo, 6517 Lucia Lane, presented a written petition for denial and objection to the rezoning request. He stated his objections were essentially the same as those expressed by Mr. Burris. 1. Spot rezoning 2. Traffic prob7ems and hazards a. Traffic from KC Hal] and apartments to the north already cause congestion. b. Highway 65 and Mississippi St. intersection already has a history of many serious (and some fatal) accidents. c. The driveway area within the complex would be like a huge parking lot, with possibly not enough room to safely accormiodate up to 28 vehicles. Traffic movement within the area would pose dangers to residents and small children. d. Heavy traffic flow on all three sides of the proposed site would definitely pose a safety hazard to children whose play areas would be adjacent to the traffic. 12 D PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 5 3. Depreciation of home values a. Loss of beautiful trees b. D�plexes and multip]e dwellings are not as carefully maintained in general as single family homes. 4. Burden on homeowners • a. Sewer and water mains are not equipped to handle such a large increase in popu7ation in such a small area. A sewer back-up problem a7ready exists. 5. Increased density would not be consistent with urban and city planning which is designed to protect the quality of residential life. 6. Residents bought homes with the knowledge this property was zoned R-1, and they want the area to remain R-1. Ms. Bystram, 6533 Lucia Lane, stated her concern was with off-street parking. Besides the 14 units with possibly two cars for each unit, there are also going to be guests. Sometimes it is easier to park on the street, and the only p7ace to park would be on Lucia Lane.� With the apartments north on Lucia, there is ample parking, but still there are cars parking on the street. That had to be stopped with "no parking" signs in front of the homes. Ms. Schnabel asked if there was guest parking within the interior of the development. Mr. Deblon stated that according to the first draft plan, there is no guest �; parking, but some areas have been discussed for guest parking. ti Ms. Irene Haedtke, 6540 Lucia Lane, stated she would be very unhappy if she was "boxed" in by this development. There are beautiful trees on this lot. and in looking at the drawing of the development, she knew there would not be one oak tree left on that lot. Single family homes would be fine, because some of the trees could be saved. For ecology reasons, she did not think the development was feasible. Mr. Eugene Lane, 1132 Mississippi St., stated he has lived in Fridley for 32 years. In the morning between the hours of 6:00 and 9:00 and between 4:00 and 7:00 in the afternoon, the intersection at Mississippi and Highway 65 is very busy. It is not feasib7e to put that much additional new traffic onto Mississippi. Mr. '�Henry Melcher, 6500 Pierce St., stated he would like to reinforce what the resi�jents have already said. At 7:00 a.m, he has trouble making a left hand turn onto Mississippi. At 3:00-5:00 p.m., the cars are backed up past Lucia Lane past his house to get through the Mississippi�Highway 65 intersection. Mr. Timo had talked about the great number of accidents at this intersection, and Mr. Melcher ' stat�ed this could be reinforced by looking at the police reports. Mr. INelcf�er stated he and his M►ife paced this are.a oft. and i� tFiis development� went into this area, there would virtually not be any oak trees ieft on the lot. He stated this is also too high a density to put into this area. �E PLA�INING CONMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 _ PAGE 6 Mr. Cory Bystram, 6533 Lucia lane. stated his house would be facing the back end of the two double bungalows. He stated he has been delivering papers for six years, and he knows a little about what people leave in their back yards. He dlid not think they should have to look at these back yards and what might be left: there. If there is only one garage for each unit, where are people going to s:tore their lawn mowers, equipment, bicycles, and other things people usually stor�e in a garage? Mr. Joe Randall, 1210 Mississippi St., stated his family was involved in an acci- dent: at the intersection of Mississippi and Highway 65. He stated he rides the bus and has a difficult time crossing Highway 65 to catch the bus. It is a highly conc�ested area. The oak trees are fantastic. He would like to see this area stay zone�d residential as the zoning cammission originally said. Ms. Bystram, 6533 Lucia Lane, stated that in hearing the price range of the condo unil:s, there is likely to be a lot of families with small children. She did not see any additional planning for play areas for these children. Mr. Dean Thomas, 6550 Lucia Lane, stated he also agreed with everything that has been said. He would be very unhappy to see this development. It is too many peoE�le in too small an area, and they would lose the beautiful trees. Mr. Darrel Goerdt, 6610 Lucia Lane, stated earlier in the meeting Mr. Deblon had mentioned the deep lots and whether any of the owners of these lots would cons>ider subdividing their lots in the future. He stated he bought his lot bec�iuse it is e deep lot, and he would never consider subdividing it. Mr. Erickson stated that some of the remarks he had heard seem to imply that seccmd class citizens will be going into this development. He disagreed 100%. Ther•e will be a homeowners' association which F�as very rigid rules, so there will aot be any trashy back yards. The maintenance is all hired out and none of the ownE�rs have any responsibility for the upkeep. Ms. Gabel stated she agreed with Mr. Erickson. It has been her experience that homE�owners' associations do a very good job in maintaining a condo project. She also agreed with the comnent that with the price range, these units will prot�ably be first family homes and starter homes, and there probably would be a lot of children. She thought the idea of a play area should be considered in the project. Mr. Erickson stated he would be paying a large park fee and he felt that was adequate. He thought the bulk of the buyers will be empty nesters, retired people. Thi> is based on the flow of buyers that are turning up in the different condo pro;jects around the metropolitan area--Apple Valley, Eden Prairie, North Oaks, Coon Rapids. Ms. Joyce Swanson, 6601 Lucia Lane, stated this was all pure speculation, and the;✓ really do not know who will nave into these units. This is an R-1 zoning, and there will be a density problem, traffic problems, and sewer and water problems. There will be no oak trees. There will be children. There will be parking on Luc�ia Lane, and people will be walking through back yards. LF PLANNI��G COMMISSION MEETING `,MAY 18,�1983 PAGE 7 Ms. Bystram stated that at this point, she thought they had to be realistic and maybe there needs to be some kind of balance. If this property was rezoned to A;-3, was there any possibility of the developer reducing the number of units? She would like to see this as an option. Mls. Schnabe] asked Mr. Erickson if he ►rould consider reducing the number of units. Mr. Erickson stated he wou]d not. MOT2'ON BY PlS. GABEL, S�ICONDED BY l�Qt. SABA, 1�D CLOSE TNE PUBLIC XEARING ON ZOA NB3-03 BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON. UP011' A VOICE VOTE, ALL YOTING AYE� Cl1AIRWQNAN SCHNABEL DECL�IRED TilE PUBLIC XEAF'ING CLOSED AT 9:20 P.M. Mr. Saba stated that one of the main objections expressed by the citizens was thP sewer problem. Was there really a sewer problem? Mr. Deblon stated that was a question that would have to be answered by the Engineering Department. Engineering had not expressed any concern regarding thi�; proposal. Routine maintenance is 6eing done continually on the sewer system. He �;tated he would check the record to see if tf�ere would be a problem as far as cape�city and get this information back to the Planning Comnission or the City Courici 1. Ms. Schnabel stated the sewer problem should definitely be checked with Engineering. Alsc>, no matter what development eventually goes on this lot, something else that should be checked with Engineering is wF�at the County's intention is in terms of a ri�ght turn lane. Ms. Gabel stated she had to speak against the rezoning, She felt it was a spot rezoning. The zoning is inconsistent with the neighborhood and the planning donE► over the years. She was also concerned with the sewer, and they needed morE� information about it. The traffic problems are obvious, but the biggest prot>lem she had with it was the spot rezoning. Mr. Oquist stated he agreed with Ms. 6abe]. It was spot rezoning; however, some- t6ing �vill be done with this property, and f�e did not think anyone would be puti:ing in single family homes. He was also concerned about the traffic. Mr. Kondrick stated it would be great to be able to leave that property vacant; bowE�ver, they have to consider the overall good of the cortmunity. Housing is neecied in the City. He liked the set-up of the homeowners' association. He also coulld not imagine anyone wanting to live in a single family home on this corner. He ��greed that it was spot rezoning, but his main concern was the traffic. Mr. Saba stated he did not have as many objections with the spot rezoning, because he iFelt it would never be developed as R-1. He had a prob]ero with the density. He would rather see the double bungalows facing Lucia Lane, and he would prefer to :>ee two more double bungalows instead of the carriage-type homes. 12 G PLAIVNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 8 Mr. Oquist stated the other side of the issue is that the City needs to provide Mrha�t is called "affordable housing", and this is affordable housing. Ms. Schnabel stated she was concerned about the density. She felt it was more uni�ts than she would like to see go into this area. She, too,shared the concern aboi�t spot rezoning, 6ut also did not see single family homes ever going in the�re. Mr. Saba stated he liked the concept despite the objections. He could see a dev�elopment like this going in there eventually, but with fewer units. Mr. Deblon stated he looked at the positioning of this development as creating a q�uieter environment for the homes on Lucia Lane. He stated the concerns expressed were very valid, but he thought this was a positive aspect of a develop- ment of this nature. NOT.ION BY !�lR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SAB�1, TO RECQMMEND TD CITY COUNCIL DENIAL OF �REZONING REQUEST, 20A N83-03, BY L. ROBERT ERICKSON, TO REZONE TflE WEST HALF OP ,LOT 4, AND ALL OF LOTS 5� 6 AND 7� LUCIA ZANE ADDITION, FROP! R-1 (SINGLE FAM.ILY DWELLING AREAS) TD R-3 (GENERAL PlULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO ALLOW TAE CON,STRUCTION OF A 14-UNIT CONDOMINIUlN PROJECT, THE SAJ�lE 9EING 1133-1105 J�lIS,SISSIPPI STREET N.E. Mr. Oquist stated the sewer issue and the County's plans for widening Mississippi and putting in a right turn lane should be resolved before this item goes to the City Council. UPO�W A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWCrlAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TXE NOTION CAR.RIED UNANIMOUSLY. NOT.IAN BY �JS. GABEL� SECONDED BY 1�i. SABA, TO RECENE INTO TXE RECORD TiiE LETTERS FRD�H RUSSELL BURRIS AND JUNE JOHNSON AND TNE PETITZON FROM CLARENCE TIMD, AND TO FQR�WARD TilESE ON WITi1 THE MINUTES 410 CITY COUNCIL. UPO,N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWONlAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANZXOUSLY. Ms. Schnabel stated that on June 6, the City Council would set the public hearing for Ju�. �,u,E�. �� /9�.3 2. LOT SPLIT REQUEST: L.S. �83-OI�I�IARGARET A. SEGER• Split off the southeriy j04.02 Feet of Lot l, Block 2, Spring Lake Park LaTceside, the same being 7650 Lakeside Road N.E. (Original Lot - 1586 Osborne Road N.E.) Mr. Deblon stated this was an informal hearing as required by the subdivision ordinance for a lot split. Mr. Deblon stated this 7ot split was requested back in 1975. The request came before the Planning Camnission and the Planning Com�ission recormiended the �H PLAMNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 9 pet�itioner have the property surveyed and that all utility easements be worked out with NSP, Northwestern Bell, Minnegasco, Cable Television and.the City Fngiineering Dept, before going on to City Council (page 12, Planning Carmission �oinutes, June 25, 1975). Mr. Art Seger stated he was representing his mother, Margaret Seger, who had to leave the meeting earlier. Mr. Deblon stated the lot is exceptionally deep, over 208 feet. The new lot wou'Id become 104 feet by 100 feet which would more than exceed the requirements for a buildable lot. He stated Staff had the following concerns: 1. The petitioner get a survey after the decision of the Planning Canmission. 2. There is a park fee requirement (applicant is aware of this) 3. There be a bikeway/walkway easement and street easement on the fr�nt lot along Osborne (tle be]ieved it was a 17' street easement and a 15' bikeway/walkway easement totalling 32 feet.) Mr. Deblon stated this lot split meets all the requirements thus far per the subcfivision ordinance. Ne stated the sewer and water lines will be checked out befc>re the request goes before the City Council. Other than that, Staff did not see any problems with the lot split. 1�IOZ'�'ON BY J�II2. OQUIST, SECONDED BY J�t. KONDRICK, TO RECQMMEND !1� CITY COUNCIL j APPF20VAL OF LOT SPLIT REQUEST, L.W. 1Y83—01, BY MARGARET A. SEGER, TD SPLIT OFF TXE SOUTHERLY 204.02 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK i, SPRING IJlKE PA1iK LAKESIDE, TXE SAMii BEING 7650 LAKESIDE ROAD N.E. (ORIGINAL LOT — 1586 OSBORNE ROAD N.E.), idlTii TXE FOLIAWING STIPULATIDNS: 1. STAFF CIARIFY THE AJNOUNT OF EASEMENT AIEEDED OFF GLSBQRNE ROAD FOR STREET AND BII�'WAY/WAI.KWAY. ?. STAFF CNECK Rl� SEE IF ANY EASENENTS WERE REQUZRED FROM THE IITILITY COMPANIES AND CABLE TV. • 3. STAFF CIARIFY THE SEWER LINE. 0. TXE APPLICANT GET A SURVEY OF TXE PROPERTY PRIOR T10 THE CITY COUNCIL MEE?ING. UPOD7 A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CflAIRWQMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNAr�IMOUSLY . Ms. Schnabel stated this item would go to City Council on June 6. 3. REVIEW OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 101 ENTITLED "ANIMAL MOT�'ON BY lII2. OQtIIST� SECONDED BY lIIi. XONDRICK, TD CONTINUE REVIEW OF THE ANIMAL ORD�'NANCE UNTIL TBE NEXT XEETING. 1JPOD7 A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIIVG AYE� CXAIRWOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TNE 1HOTZON CARitIED UNANIINOUSLY. 12 I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 18, 1983 PAGE 10 MOT�CON BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY J�t. KONDRZCK, Z�O RECEIVE TBE MEMO DJ4TED MAY 1B, I9B3, FRQM JIX PHILLIPS, LEGAL INTERN. . ilP�1V A VDICE YOTE� ALL YOTING AYE� CNAZRWC�MAN SCXNABEL DECI.i1RED T1iE MOTION G1R1iIED UNANIJNOUSLY. 4. RECEIVE APRIL 27, 1983, HOUSING b REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: llOT:fON BY XR. OQUIST, SECONDED BY XR. SABA, TD RECENE TNE APRIL 27� 1983, AOU:iING i REDEVELOPMENT AUTXORITY l�1INUTES. The Comnission members agreed they would like Mr. Boardman to come to a future mee�ting and explain the HRA's financing process and the General Reserve System. UP01V A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CXAIRWOJNAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE !�lOTION CARI4IED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE MAY 5, 1983, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: J�IDT.ION BY MR .OQUIST, SBCONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO RECENE TAE PlAY 5� 1983, XUMAN RESi�i1RCES COMMISSION 1�lINUTES. UPO�W A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRWQMAN SCHNABEL DECI.ARED TXE MOTION CARi4IED UNANIl�lOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE MAY 10, 1983, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: NOT,ION BY MS. GRBEL, SECONDED BY I�IIi. 1COIVDRICK� TO RECENE TXE NAY 10, 1983, APP.EALS GY+IUlMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CJfAIRWQMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CAR.RIED UNANINOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY l�t. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY 1�2. SABA, TO AA70URN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, A LL VOTING AYE, CXAIRWQNAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE XAY 18, 1983, PIANNING CGiFlMISSION 1�lEETING AA7QIRNED AT 10:20 P.M. Respectfully subm' �ted, � L'ynne aba Recor ng Secretary � - � ��.:. �� j i� ,5�3 � �� i�o • � � ,��.�� ,��;c�-t-�- �.z.,�....�:.- ��.�� / � - � �,,� t�-�- (� • p�g..-.�-..� � // ,� �� ;a, /�r.- �,�-+ � " " .: � �° '� 7n, , � ��,-� . �,.��,�� /''�'� v,Y'-. ,/i�4 �L�,,.� � �,�� c..e� , � �� _.�� ,� � ��-�� l -�..�.Q„�.,._ .1 �� a/ � � - i'��' . ��/o - ��.� �%�' �� 6 JZ'v � �s.ir-V�-� � � � � `� , � / !$' p G��-e�', �� , � . ,� �S/ 7 ��,�.� �,✓ �(/E. �J / , yC� ��a/ � /''� � si � " ��-- �. �_ 6 SSO �� •� " � �ia ' �� ' - � .��6 � . � �� 7 � i Z � G �' � ' - ....,vv r ��'-/��' �i � J / �f G / ,� C � U-L.rf �l � _ 5 �o � � Z �'• .c�,c ` �� ,�� `�, �� , �� P� r.�� x 3Z Z� / (� � 33 1....�.�.��, �.,-, (�533 L �-�,u ln � �� , �. �,�,�/P/ i-�� „` ��. � — - a � - - .. ��g�i! L��t�t !' �� .��g� � li�t�� ' N � O� � �� W 0 M' � •o W� �~ � � � 2 .� �- �� ci - - <C cJ �� _1 _ , - � � T _ ! _ _ � nc. arc �nu �.�u►oar. 1 i ��nr.-� ZOA #�83-03 L. Robert Erickson � K 17c�nir. L Mlrr tMnYa�71�1L • ' ` t _ �'- — `�.--- f � Y- �� - -� - - �-- �� t n � :i��i 1 • i -+i , � - _�; � - _ �-� � �._ � �. �. �-�= .s� �.. ��-� �-; F � _,YA � - ' � ,y � , � v � �� •�r :�,` ., } � �--�„�,��- � -.��,;��'"��' � � _ :,<,a-•� � ,,,�� -�' .=+� ��,�r` t�' t . �:� � .i,�. � � . �. �- �,, �Y � �� ,T'` � � � ,�� ::�,� �` � 4 ..:�.� � � ` � �,� '!. r � �� r i� __�� n rd y •�� ►� f �� '.�'�-'��: �!. .4 � `� .�.1�`� ��'=4�'� �-`�� r �„� ; � -- � � � � �"`.�.�' - �,�-� t 4 � � '�`'• „�- .t .41��h_ :i}`c.'�„�, :� ��:' "� 'F�';� � ��-�6 ` - i�$� � � �ri� �+F�.:?Y� ; fi'S'_ / :: -? � � � . �� J r . ��e"�.-," �'3'- ` ,� t• � . � , ,� . I '` y' � � l� � : :s.�• . � �.,.afSJ� • r �� _�" � � � r �� , .;,� -r r � � � �� f '� _� � � : . - :�,� —� :- ' _ �'' _ .y�J � � � � � . ' r � , , '..: � �� . � � - _ � �- ��' �� , �. � ��. � � • '� �. �_�.��:a.°� � �'- �+� -a� � T 1= �� ,`; � r � ► �� ♦ t � 1 � � ` FK � �� . • � � 7 r-�----_ "'n'� �-, � � � ` �� - � " � �� - i� • , � __ � 1 • . .,,,_ � � f,�"' �,� i �f`��• '�'�/ � � � � �``==.,�` �!�` .y ` �N � �� : ` � 3 � �.�.��- ,� - " �� . _, ,� .� � ..� .. , �,.w__� � � 4 �,� -� + t� �` r�i '4 �-r�s r x�.'-?�� _,;._ � s� .�� T • ? ._ ] � . _ u iz: r � �� ¢ � � '- � ' �� . I'�6„''�P„ "'� -"' ,�, ,��, �`.� y'� � I t w�� -,a �� . � �!$ ,: � . "r+, �r +r + r s �.1�1� �'� � �f � : w� "'� , .��-,�+= , i4�;,*4C. �v :-, +g '� � r ��.��,�„"h � t �'}.I� �i � '�Z �. r� 63 ..� ' -.� s. _ �i.�. 't...� .- �-� �� % K � -'? ! .. - ..T'�) ! �_ . . <j �v ,�"1°F" �..:-'1,r '-, i � ��'�',,, �;%'.'' �. �,rJ'. -" � ►' s' ,� � � �. . : _ �� `. �e � � �.�.a � a' f s - ..�,� . ':: y �h+y3� T�! � ' � � ,. ��.. 4 � ' �r �^ ��Y 1r fx �' 2'i.t.!p . �l�. �+. Y 1 " �' - �3l � �n. �- �o.r� � iT� 'fltr \ `�' - �: ,+�5' , , ,,�1►i' �� _ .�.-�;� �- . . . _ � y -t _ : " .., �!� .�",�� ?�" ��'� � f� �-s,6 '�+.' ' ��.� r x ��' y�f fi'� � . ?" ,a - .f- ?i,,fR T i : _ �-� �� .'�Ct �. �.:f�_��' �` _�f' -f�. �- Y-� � } � `�� r � r �,p •�-� .�t •� - �- ��.� r...i ��+ �-� ,; i ` , � _ f- <�r.�at- J.� ;� :�� _� `''-�--r, i. ", ,.i� �r �� 3R -�' _ ' _:rtr_s. � *-- : _ �� I i � N N � � � ZOA #�83-03 L. ROBERT ERICKSON STAT E T2 U tJ �L N t G N V� AY N O. `� -.---- - �� ---..-- ---•-• 190 - •- -.... �uc �a �ANE ,2 � r� �_. ._-•--- 9U ---•- •---- � I � 'r'_� �' ; � . � w � � � � TM� a�TV os L�!� �ATE - fROM SUBJECT �IAECTORATE OF puB��c woR�cs June 2, 1983 ',W„ John G. Flo Lot Split #83-01 � �� MEMOiaANOUM TO ACTION 1NF0� Nasim M. Qureshi, City Manager _ M�;. Margaret Seger is again requesting to split her lot on the southwest cc�rner of Osborne Road and Lakeside Road. TY�e County is interested in improving Osborne Road east of Old Central, btit do not have sufficient right-of-way in this increment. The City also ha►s identified a bikeway/walkway along Osborne Road in this section. Ac:cordingly, a 32 foot easement should be obtained along Osborne Road to a]_low for future improvements. T}�ere are no internal lot easements required for this split. (Lot #2, 1°'>78 Osborne Road is land locked and would have to provide internal access ar�d utility easements if it is e�zer �plit) Tliere are sewer and water services on Lakeside to support this lot split. I:F the City Council supports this lot split, a park fee of $500 in addition tc� a survey will be required. JGF/mc , '� � , i a eB ► 4 �� 6�/ •i � .ti o �� W i . L.S„ ��- —� , BIOc �./ (� !� L��d-. 15 � � �R: - S�r�l� ' N E CORNEr� , in a1� Par . akeside SEC. �2 . � - ��. , • '—'__• . j . . . a . . I ' � , '1..'�3�.fA.f•'^.P! I � % �^,' � _ ,'•� • � ` ~'\ . ? ''h` �!. � �______ . r.- �.) 5 � '`'" � ` .. . � `�'%e �--- . _ - - . �Q ' 12'� , , ,,� � � — — - ,';� � � c . : : �; �S� /s 8;, �, - �`' �"=-E�5 E-� �-" --=� -- , � � ,� � '. ,� : . �� ^ � ^ ^ — � � 76�� ' ' _ ��--- - - - � • ,- � � •� � , [ - . 2Y ' " �� b ` �°- ..; .: �� .��.. ��;�2 � ,. , , � ... ' . • . . q.,. ,.- ,� . � � 1! �t ,��, ,� Ib �� ;�7D ,,��, -,�•• �:s•se t _�� ., �b . �• �� C e ~ � ti � w ...r 4 y6 yo .�� y � , ^ "__ • �,3; y63�� • � �'°F� � � " ` � ��Zy° � � ,^ � j -` . -- - ` � -r: ! t ►� .�. � T �� `---o , , �., . 7� . � 5 � :�=' _ -�;; �— ��! � .� � � , � � `�G � �� .. ,�o,�1��2 r.y1 (.. i- � :fQ E' � �"♦�• r /CC , /IO � •• �. ., ' �— � • � 1� � � �- — '. . t.�..i.i��iLEY• ST. _ < � / t � .,� � � , I '�0 /c � 0 /l.' .? . ,. g� � 6 � /��i�Tr`��.�L.� ''� a,., 7��V . ,' li . � J� ' JJ ,: . _ __ _?:i �f _ _" • ,..,, • ��1� t � o� 29? t F _ •y _ � : „.. `<� t �i . ,� ; � . 7 ` ` Y � �, , _ y5gy ` ,,........; � � ',�� ,. �a�c- - - � �v�� ---�r�iF�- - -•i--- - ^��,'9------ � � � - . _ J.. � : - 1 ' •�SZ �- -��-SI4�lQ�J�� ' � ('� ; � ,o i �: .�/.. ' - r�9Y`� — -- i �Jtf a�--J'�:� "- --- —�9��-- - � ��'7�lJ j,,. �;� ^ . � � 3 " r ~ W � �r �i�'�l (•';J 75�� . '. , . � p � ��. � . _ � ,_ J. %t �i� .. •- - � ,�-� ' � � � ` , ry {/�,� �i� �. �. _ � l '� .Y' f: �l � : • n�� p `.I t .�i � i� _. �� • ... .. � aa t• � m� `� 1,� � /� d. �y. � .t J�=a � . � - -- W � 52 = ; �L�� , ; �`�� • .�•s ' c. ,�-;�-�t r i . - : �4 �5� '� ' �„Z :�7�; ,• : �_ � ��'� 7slg, �. � , �- . . , ; �� . -- .1- ; .' S7Z t ,�t�,�,� = z «1 � ,,:j � t---' - - --- . 1 � --��zi ! —J.��S' ` , � � w .r � �. � .,� ',;s � • -- j •° 'r: •)' �J �� sa .� �: ; -�� ;��-� . ��f i �.1' j . .w, i ^ /�,'i 4 � �J' • . � "") � � 7L'' ♦�/ 't � ' • " • �� '�� 5��1 � 5Q0 << v t��` pl - •. r`�� yS= `' � 6 � yy5�� r .� . J � .�5 ��_ � 1 �.�. z:.:.� � ,- w � r. ... 1l �T7�J ._� �F-�' °E•�,'�f1Vt. � - .:�"'ri�� i —I�I.L.--- - - � `� i _ _ -.--. ,� ,<gy � . : � . IS6N^; 15�y . � ..�..,. 's ;.,, �� p ��ti,. so .. ; l6ia � , ��"p � A:;;,,, � �� . i�vo . , � � � � �j��o� Ib7�ti , ,,�<�o,Y o= 0 1 � � , ,yg� � F ,fl.ere, � ` `' 1 . _ ,. : + n � 1; � i., � s� st �� ^' ` . • ,��.. _ �� a� _ ��` •�, ., �� ss' � ;a�'� � �'-: • ..— jis I,�� -- ,--'rs�� {T. -- • ' � _'�_ � .�f��• :•i.'.� y , .��:��,'��°� a� . '�. � -^� � _ ` _,:• '� ' ��f� U 1- ; �a. � 1�f�l -. � ; = - -� : /17 �' ,'� G'� i.�.- h '� s= •� • ,�,/��%r51� ..+�yJ" a" e�i 6 - , a �� . � � �''iNSy � ._ •� 1 -iO ,Y•'J3 i� `� ro � �io � � L '" ° • _I � W • � � � . , �� '=9J> � y 3b J, yy ,,�, 7y36 � I �b .. ��J . - I ; � _ ._ . d.'1B Z �� /7 , � t w � a �1 : � �'+�' V � Y � � ' �', 7 �� , �,,.., � � 1�� ;: �. - `�'�� 9 c� �. � ; � � . , - a • ' _ � . 5 ��' 4. �---3 � - t � ,��r� A�•.9.. � t =' . � � -, e yy�9 , ^': � <� ;, . : ;. . ; .�� ; � ; � ; . n�l . 16,7/ � 7f�P� - . . 33 yQO ��0 � ��1 ,, ; • , e � � �i �3 -o / 7�7� Z' �. L.S. i�5=03, ��R�+I� SEGER Split Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Lake Park Lakeside into two building sites � '1 ' 12 P � 1 �W 1 a � � � v � Ci,ty v b f�,cd.�eN APF�EALS COMMISSION MEETING - TUESDAY. MAY 10, 1983 PAGE i CAlL 70 OROER:= Chairperson Gabel called the Appeals Conmission Meeting of May 10, 1983 to orc.er at 7:30 p.m. ROL,L CALL : Members Present: Patricia 6abe1, Alex Barna, Jim Plemel, Jean Gerou, Donald Betzold Ottiers Present: Darrell Clark, City of Fridley Mark Haqgerty, 6441 University Avenue N.E. E.R. and Louise Owczar2ak, 777- Rancher's Road Bruce A. Nedegaard, 111 - 45th Avenue N.E. Dick Harris, 6300 Riverview Terrace APf�ROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 26, 1983: MO'fION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mrs. Gerou, to approve the minutes as written. UPON A YOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CAI�RIEU UNANIMOUSLY. 1. VARIANCE REQUEST E � R 205 OF TH Request by E. R. and Louise Owczarzak, Road N.E., Fridley, Ml 55432). E FRIDLEY CITY CODE, TO LDING FROM THE MAXIMUM OF INED BY AN 8,775 SQUARE 3z EAST RANCH ESTATES RANCHER'S ROAO N.E. gineering, 7170 Rancher's MOTION by Mrs. Gerou, seconded by Mr. Barna, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON 6ABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the Staff Report: •D!!IlI3iR�TI7B 3?�FF RBPORT TT02 aad TT70 ltanchsr' a Road 11. E. �. PflBI.IC PORPOSB SBRO� BT REQOIR�lR: S�otion 205.13;� 3. • reQuirea a aazioum Iot coverage for a one atory O�ilding of #0 percent. t'uplic purpose served by thia requireaent ia to provide tor adequate p�arking. open landscaped areas aad Lo liait conge�tion of induatrial areas. 8. S7�THD S4RDSEIP: •'Elo Engineering, Inc. bas ezperienced tremendou� grovth and au�t eitner �bve out of the City of Fridley to new Quartera or eserciae ita option on t.De 24�300 aquare toot puilding immediately to ita soutb rhich ia located c►n Lot 4 as deacribed berein. In order to aake the transition economically f'easible� LDe tvo Duildinga ■uat be coanected xith an 8,T75 aquare foot ndditioa but that addition vould iacreaae tbe arei coverage to 45-45 percent coverage of tDe co�Diaed sQuare footage of the lota. � Q � � A�,peals Commission Meeting - May 10, 1983 Page 2 3. �IklS>IS7R�TI98 3'r�FF RSYIBY: ?t�ia request ia to iacreaae the required lot coverage ia an M-2 District ft�om 00� to 45.�5x in order to construct an 8,775 aquare foot addition. ?tie addition vould aerve sa a link Detween a 2�1�300 aquare foot vacant b�iilding and a 22.342 square foot buildiag preaentlp occupied by the aj�pl icant . St;aff Las been working rith the applicant in order to keep them from re�locatiag out of tbe City. TDe applicant had planned to move out of the Citty because theq needed aore aquare footage. Coon Rapid� had made tbem of'fers to aove to their City. Staff ras able to keep the applicant in Fridley through diacusaions rith tbem. The applicant has taken an option a� the property to tbe aouth vbicb haa been vacant for aome time. The oj>tion ia eonditioned on being aDle to eonnect tbe two buildings whlch wc�uld provide the aquare footage tbey need. Staff has revieved the site p].an. Although the plan ahoxs �5.45i lot coverage, the parking is aciequate . If' thia requeat ia approved, tbe folloving items may be considered: 1„ Tbe applicant work vith tbe City and adjacent proerty owners to insure acfeQuate drainage. 2„ �dditional landseaping/screeaing be implemented. Mr. Clark said there was a third stipulation recomnended by the staff and that is if the variance is approved and Owczarzaks purchase the building, that the tw�� parcels be combined together to be one tax statement. Ne also said that th�� distance between the two buildings is 1-1.5 feet wider than on the plans re�riewed earlier and with the addition it would be just under 9,000 sq. ft. He said the property is located just nortF� and west of Bob's Produce in a fa�irly new industrial area. Ms. Gabel asked if ti�e 6uilding to the south is va�:ant. Mr. Haggerty said the owners went through a bankruptcy and techni- ca'Ily it is supposed to be vacant, that there is some residual occupancy. He at��o said the northerly wall and the southerly wa11 are not exactly parallel (6�i'8" and 66'.65") and the city staff put together the drawings in the agenda pa�:ket. He said the ELO manufactures 'shells' for computer equipment for cornpanies like Honeywell and their businees has grown. He said they had lined up financing and land in Coon Rapids for 84,000 sq. ft. and then the building to the sout[� became vacant. Mr. Haggerty said they will match the landscaping to the present building and tf�at parking is adequate and they will be adding si;c new employees. He said drainage on the soutf�erly end of the new building wi'il be off to 77th Avenue and drainage from the new roof will be onto Rancher's Ro��d. He stated they will be working with Dick Harris, who owns the building bei�ind ELO, on drainage. He also said they will meet all setback requirements al'I around the building and it will be an attractive building. Mr. Barna asl�ced a6out actuai square footage and Mr. Clark said it will be just under 9,1�00 sq. ft. (8,991 or 8,998). Mr. Betzold asked if that would change the pei�centage and Mr. Clark said it would changefx�om 45.45 to 45:�33`;�. Mr. Pleme-1 then'asked if the addition�would be cement block, mansard roof, and if they would t.ie that in9 Mr. Haggerty said yes, that's the way it would be. 12 S Af►peals Commission Meeting - May 10, 1983 Page 3 Mr. Owczarzak said the 6uildings will be one color and the heights will be tr�e same. Mr. Harris said he has talked with ELO a6out the drainage and that th�ere is a little �olding pond wit� the new cur6ing and he has not noticed any dr�ainage problem recently and there has not been any wash-outs with the south bwilding and t�ey will 6e working together on drainage w�en the new building ga�es in. Ne said he is in favor of t6e proposal and that he has been neighbors with ELO for about 6 years, t6at they keep up t�eir building and property and tfiey have been good neigh6ors. He also said it was important to keep them in Fr•idley. Ms. Gabel asked about tf►e loading docks. Mr. Nedegaard (the con- tr�actor) said they will stay as they will back trucks in there and the trucks will be enclosed in the building. M(ITION by Mr. Plemel, seconded by Mr. Betzold, to close the public hearing. U'F'ON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE; CHAIRPERSON GABEL OECLARED THE PUBLIC HE:ARING CLOSED AT 7:47 P.M. Mr. Plemel felt this company f�as done a nice job in the past, that the addition will not be offensive and he was in favor of tf�e variance. Mr. Barna said he wa�s in favor of tf�e variance also, tf�at there is 4.5X additional lot coverage arid the natural terrain of the property makes it that high. Mr. Betzold felt tl�e public purpose would still 6e adequately served and he was in favor of the veiriance. Ms. Gabel said the other requirements are being met and there is a dE�finite hardsf�ip -- expand or move -- and she would be in favor. NK)TION 6y Mr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Barna, that the Appeals Commission re- c'c►mmend to the City Council, approval of the variance request to increase the lc�t coverage for a commercial building from tF�e maximum of 40X to 45b3°'. to a111ow two buildings to 6e joined by an 8�98 square foot addition locatec on Lc�ts 3 and 4, Block 3, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, the same being 7;i02 and 7770 Rancher's Road N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, with the following s1tipulations: 1) the applicant work witF� the City and adjacent property owners. to insure adequate drainage; 2) additional landscaping/screening be implemented; and 3) that the two parcels be combined together to be one tax statement. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT: MI)TION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Plemel, to adjourn. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VI)TING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 10, 1!�83, ADJOURNED AT 7:51 P.M. R��spectfully submitted, aeb Niznik R�ecording Secretary � 0 0 r _ �� _ _ _ � A�� : w 1 � • � !� , �1 , t� � I +� � �_ � � � ` f� � � I� ' � �'i r�, . ��. • .�. � w..r...r � :� � � . � � _ ___ � - �,,-.�.�. ,.� �. r� . ��. �!� P � /IJw ` �, � ��89r ° ��80 � � . . , . _ Il9t �IJI �i '� ' � g�r ry • 3 ,� � ' � j � �T _� � s �/i . �� 9s �� t �o _ .�• � • ` / � 77o��a3�,7)ot � ✓� . r ance for 7702-7770 Rancher's Road Addn. ELO Engineerinq � . • � �� 0 ► •, �� •'t� �,�.�.,.r.'�'�:. � �7 �� - - �•_ � � I �� '�. � ,, 1 • � s ia� ' � `� ' �►� 784s � z , ' '�� 7� � • ` ` ' 'ui � .�.��. : ES � . � : .,�-.� -- AT �� . �.rAi��ii. _ 1 � � � �N ��l _ . A � �� !� ��ss � �� /e • p0 11 � � A , ,�.; i�i,.� • __ ,,r I�►,� - -- - t . O � �i I �, � � s � . „�, . ,�� . , :��,-- �' , - �� :� . r/o �• � � . ' ) s,�o,o ...':',., � �-. !�`� / -�-- - : ��i s 7'f �� : 12 � J '; j,� I � � � �� t � , , ' . �.f , �► t � �-, 1 I � � � � � � . � : : � � � � ; ; . , , ; � � . i � I �,.. . � ; j. � � � � �� 0 I j N �12 U � �� 0 � w � � � � � t � �� O a � i 6ui�aau►6u3 Ol3 � � "'�� peoa s,�ay�uea OLLL-ZOL[ �o� a�ue��e� � �� - - - � ��- - -- --- — - -- - � . � .,.�.._,.. �� . � . . -� �,� �►-� ��A , ; �'� W . � � `� t ' (;� ti �� r' ,� � � ' rY � � � �� _ �� W �, � � .. ; � � �. . .�� t � �� .�1� �'ic? � �� :�� .f:.'' �'� �� si1� 13 -��/� ��'f �.�.. • � . � � : o � �� o � � ,. . � � �i � c + 1 � � �� m� � ' � � o � � � � ' � � � i � ►:1 H �� o ' M �� I .� : � � � �'�i � o o z \ �'i � : c � d � � '� C ~ V •• �� 1'' u Z .� � j � � �+ : . � � a �' � » � . N :; < � : � ►;� � � � � �' � � � � �� _ � �' � !� i,r o � � �� w � � 7 � .- � . �; � o � � �, � � � � �j � � �, . i� � �� :: :�.a.�zj'.ar.�'srt� �• tr•�:��..�'.. �a!tr'a.-'�Tt�t'�[��T�� ,��,, . � �. �A 1��/.� . / � ' + y . � . �.. ��"�� '��'. �.�� _ �� 14 �tay 23, 1983 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55�►�32 Deax Sir: Due to time restraints, I feel I must resign from the city EY�ergy Conunission. This quarter� like the last, I ha,ve a college class on Tuesday evenings. Since joining the Fridley Energy Commission, I have become an Independent Republican precinct cha.irman and co- chairman of the.�ridley chapter of Minnesota Citizens concerned for Life (MCCL). I am also holding a part time job �here I do all my work on Keek ni�hts. This resignation should not be indicative of any lessening of my support for energy consexvation. Tha,nk you for the opportunity to serve. Sincerely� � , � �` � ,, i Todd D. Tessmer 15 cirz o� r�iaz ME!lOZ�■DOM 'PO s N�.4Il�! QIIRBSHI, CT!? MUilG88 �lt�ls SID DiMIN � DZHBCTOa OF CBATRIL 38R9ZC�S 3QBJECT: aE50LIITI0li lIITAORIZDiG CHANGBS DQ T� 1PPAOPRIA?ED U�D IINAPPROPRIATED FDND BILUiCBS D�1 T� QEI�BRAL FQND D�TE: !!�i 19, 19$3 On March 12, 1981, I aeat you and the Council a memorandum regardiag the necessity aad adva;ntages in ehanging aome of our appropriated and unappropriated fund balances within tlhe General F�nd. I have attached a copy of that memorandum for your review. During the recent is�ues ot bonds for HRA ia tbe City, Moody's Aating Service eommente+� on this and auggested that We continue tbis process into tbe future to in�ure a��equate reserve oash balances tor the General Fund operation ia times of financia:l crises. It i� their opinion that this ia prudent finaacial management practice and should be oontinued wbenever possible. In order to contiaue our track record o:� adequately reserving fund balances to cover future years general fuad budgets� I prepared a resolution vhich in efPect will move an additional =500,000 from the General Fund IInreserved Fund Balance to tbe General Fund Reserved for Working I;apital P�nd Balance. Zt ahoul�i be euplained that none of this money can be apent xithout apecif ic City Council �authorization and additionally, if money is apent, it Will have to go through the normal budgetary process. Our purpoae in establishing additional re�erves� in thia aceount is merely to display adequate reserves for f uture fiaancin�;. I bave at:tached a resolution for your review and rrould recommend tbat it be placed on the Cauncil Agenda at your earliest oonvenienee. Zf you have questions on this matter, >>lease feel free to let me lmorr. SI/bd Attachment �1/0/25/5' RSSOL�TZOIi i0. _ - 1983 RESOLD?ION �QTBORIZIRG CHAAGBS IIi ?HB �PPROPRIA?BD AND IINAPPROPRLTSD FQND BLLL�iCSS II�1 TSS GS�TER�L FOND iTi�R:EAS, the City has eatablished a practioe of transferring money into the Rese;rved for Working Capital Fund Balanaes for future espenditures; aad iII�R;EAS, it ia Drudent financial management to reserve aums of money to cover potential abortfalls in revenues from State� Federal or other funding aources; aad WHEAEAS, the City ehooaes to fully diacloae those Dalancea in terms of Rese;rved for ilorking Capital Fund Balanoes. NON, THEREFORE, BE ZT RESOL9ED that the amouat of =500,000 ahall be tran.sferred Prom the Geaeral Fund Appropriated Fund Balance ia 1982 into the Rese�rved General fl�nd Reserved for iiorking Capital Fund Balance. .; PAS9sD AND ADOPTED BY Ti� CI17 CODNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF _ , 1983. NILLIAM J. I�IEE - MAYOR ATTE:ST : SIDI�I.Y C. INMAN - CITY CLERR 2/2/'!T /7 bd 15 A -� T0: FROM:. CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDUM �U4SIM M. QURESHI, CITY MANAGER SID INMAN, CENTRAL SERVICES DIRECTOR SUBJE:CT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CNANGES IN THE APPROPRIATED AND UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCES 1N THE GENERAL FUND AND TRANSFER FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO TNE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OATE: MARCH 12. 1981 The following is an explanation for this resolution. 1. Within the General Fund there are two accounts that reflect on the financial position of the City. These are "Unappropriated Fund Balance" and "Appropriated Fund Balance." The Appropriated Fund Balance represents money that is earmarked for specific uses, i.e., the Emergency Reserve amount appropriated for the follo��ring year's budget. The Unappropriated Fund Balance represents money that is not earmarked for any specific purpose. In a normal year, payments to the City from the County and State for taxes and grant:� arrive in the City in late March or early April. Therefore, the City must �iraw off the Unappropriated Fund Balance during these months in order to meet cash flow requirements of operating the General Fund. Once money is received they are returned to the Unappropriated Fund Balance through the normal pro�e:�s of receipting. In prE►paring the annual report, we are not properly reflecting the Unappropriated Fund Eialance in that we use a portion of it during the three to four months of the fc�llowing year. ].5 � It is recorrmended that during the end of any year we transfer money in the amount � of twe�nty percent of the following year's General Fund Budget out of Unappropriated Fund 8;alance and into Appropriated Fund 6alance to properly reflect the use of that m�oney in the followfng year. Ne are now finalizing the 1980 annual report so we should transfer the amount of �1,100,000 which is twenty percent of the 5.5 million 1981 General Fund 2udget from Unappropriated Fund Balance into the General Fund Appropriated Fund Balance. 2• At present the City has approximately �17,700,000 in General Fixed Assets. This amount represents those Capital Outlay items that are needed to op�rate the general services of the City. This amount does not include any fixed assets that are used in the liquor store operation or in the operation of our sewer and water departments. Nhile the City is not required to maintain depreciating schedules on general 15 C T0: NA:SI�t M. QURESHI, DATE: h1ARCH 12, 1981 PAGE 2 CITY MANAGER fixed a.�sts. it is obvious that they deteriorate as they are used. It is rE�comnended that in order to properly maintain a fixed asset replacement program a�d to prepare for the affects of inflation on replacement cost, a dollar amount roughly equivalent to a normal year depreciation be set aside for future fixed as►set replacement. Based on our present level of fixed assets and using an average depreciation rate, I would recommend that s700,000 be transferred from the Unappropriated Fund Balance to the Appropriated Fund Balance for future replacement of fixed assets. 3, The City has established a Capital Improvement Fund to receive and disburse money used for• acquisition of major capital facilities other than those financed by Special Assessments and Enterprise funds. The City� has from time to time transferred money into this fund to reserve it for such facilities. It is re�corrmended that in order to continue the purpose for which the fund was established and to financially better prepare the City to meet future major capital improverr�ent requirements, the amount of �500,000 be transferred from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance to the Capital Improvement Fund. SCI:sh �: RESOLUTION N0. 35 1981 A RESOLUTION AUTNORIZING CHANGES IN 7HE APPROPRIATED AND UNAPPROPRIATED fiJNO BALAl�GES IN THE GENERAL FUNO Al�O TRANSFER FRQM 7HE GENERAL fUND TO TI�E CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 1�1NEREAS�� It is estimated that the City will use s1.100,000 of the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance to cover expenses in the first three months�or so of 1981 before the City receives property tax revenues and grants from the County and Stai:e. So this amount should be reflected in the General Fund Appropriated Fund Ballance in 1980 and t�e General Fund Appropriated Fund Balance should be adjusteci in future years to �eflect twenty percent of the following years General Fund Suciget; and WHEREAS„ Due to the yearly depreciation of the General Fixed Assets and in order to prep��re for their replacements the City should allocate �700,000 of the General Fund Unz►ppropriated Fund 8alance into the General Fund Appropriated Fund Balance; and 15 D MHEREAS,� To financially better prepare the City to meet future major capital improvement requirements, the amount of �5Q0,000 should be transferred to the Capital Improven�ent Fund from the General Fund. N4W� THE:RE�ORE, SE IT RESOLVED, That: 1. The amount of �1,100,000 be transferred from the 6eneral Fund Unappropriated fund! Balance to the General Fund Appropriated Fund Balance for 1980 and in future years the General Fund Appropriated Fund Balance be adjusted to reflect twen�,ty percent of the future years General Fund Budget. 2. The amount of �700,000 be transferred from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance to the General Fund Appropriated Fund Balance for future fixed asset �eplacement. 3. The amount of E500,000 be transferred from the General Fund Unappropriated Fund Balance to the Capital Improvement Fund. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUP�CIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 16 DAY OF March , 1981 ATTEST: ITY CLERK - SIDNEY C. INP N YOR - WILLIAM J. NEE �,,,,_.. ♦IOLE � .( �:`. �� , .� � o�,�. � POLICE DEPARTMENT c�y of F��diey Minnesota DATE �Y �•7, 1983 FROM PUBL]:C SAFETY DIRECTOR, J.P.H SUBJECT POST REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION MEMORANDUM TO NASIM QURESHI, CITY MGR. F�� 16� INFO Encic�sed you will find a resolution for consideration by City Council desig�nating a signatory for police training reimbursement money. Also enclosed is question/answer information regarding this reimbursement progr�am. I ant.icipate a rebate of approximately $4,300 within a twelve month pericd for the City of Fridley. JPH/sa RE90[,UTII7N N�. _ - 1983 RFSOLtJTION DESIGNATING SIGNATORY FOR PEACE OFFICER SZ'AND�� AND TRAINIl� iPObT) REII�LIRSH�Nr M�Y WHF�iEAS, on January 1, 1982, �e State of Minnesota began col�lecting money fran a ten peroent surcharge on all moving offenses; and WHEFtEAS, from this penalty assessment money, the Post Board has been appz�opriated 5900,000 to be used as a reimbursement to local units of goverrnnent to offset the cost of providing continuing education to peace offioers and oonstables; and WH�2EAS, the Cit� of Fridley Police Department will be eligible to seceive post training reimbursement money; and WH�2EAS, the Qzief Law Elnforoenent Offiaer of the Agency, that being James P. Hill� Public Safety Director for the City of Fridley, is required to sign the application forms on behalf of the City of Fridley; and WI�2EAS, an offioer of the City, as desi�ated by City Council, is r��; red to sic� the application in addition to James P. Hill; NQn1, �iIItF',F1�RE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of FYidley, Minnesota, as follvws: 'IY�at the Director of Central Servioes, is hereby desic��ated as the offiver of applications for post training money. Sidley C. Ir�nan of the City of Fridley, the City authorized as signator for PASSED AND ADOPTID BY �IE QTY �UNCIL OF �iE CITY OF FRIDLEY �iIS DAY OF , 1983. AZTEST: SII�IEY C. Il�II�'11�N - QTY Q�ERK 2/2/,17/8 bd W1I�LIAM J. I�E - MAYOR 16 � � �[ _V �� v C�� P O ti�� v� TNt• � T 1� n . � i _ G`� �� ♦ '„c J � 4�tiNSk M1NNE50TA BOARD OF PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AtiD TRAINING 333 StBLEY STREiT (SUITE �93) ST. PAUL, ML'�INP50'fA 55101 QUESTIONS/ANSWERS and INSTRUCTIONS RE: TRAINING REIMBURSEMENT MONEY On January 1, 1982, the State of Minnesota began collecting money from a ten percent surcharge on all moving traffic offenses. Fron this penalty assessment mone�, the R�ST Goard has been appropriated 5900,000 to be i�sed as a reimbursem ent tc local units of goverrynent to offset the cost ��f providing ccntinuin� eoucation to reace officers and constables. 'fhis notification :li � 1 address sor�e of the frequently asked questions ��bout retmbursement and serves as an instruction sheet regarding making ��pplication for the funds. ;t. �. l,�hen ►�ill POST distribute the official application forms? a.' By la�,�, the POST Board may not distribute the apptication ' fonns until July 1, 1983. ?.. Q. lJho is required to sign the application forms on �ehalf of tlie local units of goverrr�ent? A. Two peoale: (1) the chief la�� enforcement officer of t!�e ' a�ency; and _ (2) an officer (other than chief law enforce- ment officer) designated by resolution of t1�e governiny body. NOTE: To expedi�e matters so we can get the noney back to you as soon as possible after July 1, please ask your governing body (council, carmissioners, etc.) to designate a signatory now: 3. Q. I�Jhen ►ri 11 the money be sent to us? A. The POST 3oard is required to give applicants 45 days to return the appl ication forms. Ho�ti�ever, as soon as al l applications are received at POST, they will be processed and the money sent out. Please send your apalication to us in a timely fashion so we don't have to wait the entire 45 days from July 1. . -OVER- 16 B 4. Q. What must a law enforcement agency do to qual ify for reim5ursement? A. To qualify for reimbursenent, an agency head must �ffirm on an official POST Board application that during fis�al year 1983 (July 1, 1982 - June 30, 1983): (1) the department made 16 hours of POST-approved continuiny education available to each peace officer or constable for whom reimbursement is r-equested. (2) the departnent has _em-�l�--o�•ed-- each of the above represented officers for at least eig�it months of the fiscal year. (3) the department �onises to maintain all documents supporting the a irmation. 5. Q. May more than one agency receive reimbursement for the same peace officer or constable? A. No. If a licensee is'enployed by more than one agency, the Executive Director will determine which agency �,�ill receive the reimbursement inonies. � !�. �. �vill part-time peace officers or reserve peace officers qualify for reimbursement funds? " a. No. Only licensed aeace ofiicers and constables are required to acquire continuing education credits. 7'. Q. Who actually gets the money? A. The local units of goverrment will receive the check and it is to be used exclusively for reimbursement of the cost of in-service training. If you have any further questions about reimbursenent, please contact the Board's Continuing Education Unit at (612) 297-2356. 5,/ 15/ 83 16C 17 RESOLUTION N0. - 1983 RESOL�UTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 134 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Tihe City Clerk has Witfi the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected b;y this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be spec- i�slly assessed for the _ NATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 134 iin said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in a��cordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description o�F each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed a��d the amount calculated against the same. 2. N��tice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would nNeet in regular sessian at this time and place to pass on the proposed a:ssessment. 3. S�aid proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to iinspection a�d copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has b�een given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, t�� such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have b�een filed, except 4. Tlhe amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as f��l l ows : 5. This Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is s�pecially benefited by the WATER, SANITARY 5EWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 134 in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the c�orrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such l�ot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby l�evied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land therein described. 17A PAGE 2--RESOLUTION N0. - 1983 5. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirnied, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and altera- tions herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land res- pectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for - WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 134 8. The amounts assessed against each 1ot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of nine and three-fourths (9-3/4�) per cent per annum. 9. Such assessment shall be payable in twenty (20) annual installments payable on the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1984, and continuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each install- m�ent to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the �ounty A,udi tor. 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the County Auditor of A�oka County a certified statement of the amount of all such unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the first day of January in each year. PASSED AND ADOPTEO BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS OAY ��F • � 9� • MAYOR William J. Nee ATTES�T: ZTfY LERK Sidney C. rman : RESOLUTION N0. - 1983 RESOt.UTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 136 BE I1' RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. l�he City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected tiy this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be spec- 1'ally assessed for the WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 136 iin said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in 2iccordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the (:ity Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description c►f each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed tind the amount calculated against the same. � 2. Motice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would n�eet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed ��ssessment. . 3. 5aid proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to i�nspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has t>een given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, t:o such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have t►een filed, except 4. 1'he amounts specifi�ed in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as 1`0l l ows : 5. 1�his Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land enumerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is specially benefited by the WATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENi PROJEC7 N0. 136 •in the amount in said proposed assessment as altered and modified by the �:orrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such 'lot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby 'levied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land �therein described. �- PA6E 2--RESOLUTION N0. , - 1983 6. Such proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, adopted, and confirn�ed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed assessment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and altera- tions herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirn�ed as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land res- pectively. 7. Said assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by the City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute the special assessment for MATER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJEC7 N0. 136 8. The amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of n�ine and three-fourths (9-3/4ro) per cent per annum� 9. Such assessment shall be payable in twenty (20) annual installments payable a�n the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1984, and c.ontinuing until all of said installments shall have been paid, each install- R�ent to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County A�udi tor. 10. T'he City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the L;ounty Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all s,uch unpaid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the f`irst day of January in each year. PASSE:D AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1983• MAYOR William J. Nee ATTE!iT : Z`�f L RK i ney . �nan is a �i RESOLUTION N0. - 1983 RESOI.UTION CONFIRMING ASSESSNENT FOR STREET IMPROYEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1982-1 AND ST. 1982•2 BE I1' RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. 1'he City Clerk has with the assistance of the engineers heretofore selected t►y this Council for such purpose, calculated the proper amounts to be spec- iially assessed for the � , STREET II�ROVEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1982-1 AND ST. 1982-2 iin said City against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land in a�ccordance with the provisions of law, and has prepared and filed with the City Clerk tabulated statements in duplicate showing the proper description t�f each and every lot, piece, or parcel of land to be specially assessed t�nd the amount calculated against the same. 2. Motice has been duly published as required by law that this Council would meet in regular session at this time and place to pass on the proposed iissessment. 3. '►aid proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been open to i�nspection and copying by all persons interested, and an opportunity has t,een given to all interested persons to present their objections, if any, i:o such proposed assessment, or to any item thereof, and no objections have t►een filed, except 4. 1'he amounts specified in the proposed assessment are changed and altered as t`ol l ows : 5. 1'his Council finds that each of the lots, pieces, or parcels of land f�numerated in said proposed assessment as altered and modified was and is s�pecially benefited by the STREET IN�ROVEMEN7 PROJEC7S ST. 1982-1 AND ST. 1982-2 iin the amount in said proposed assessment as altered a�d modified by the c:orrective roll in the amount set opposite the description of each such llot, piece, or parcel of land, and that said amount so set out is hereby llevied against each of the respective lots, pieces, or parcels of land i:herein described. 19 19 A Page 2, RESOLUTION N0. - 1983 6. :iuch proposed assessments as altered, modified, and corrected are affirmed, �idopted, and confirmed, and the sums fixed and named in said proposed a�ssessment as altered, modified, and corrected with the changes and altera- i:ions herein above made, are affirmed, adopted, and confirmed as the proper s�pecial assessments for each of said lots, pieces, or parcels of land res- Fiecti vely. 7. S�aid assessment so affirmed, adopted, and confirmed shall be certified to by t:he City Clerk and filed in his office and shall thereupon be and constitute t:he special assessment for . STREET IMPROYEMENT PROJECTS ST. 1982-1 AND ST. 1982-2 8. 1'he amounts assessed against each lot, piece, or parcel of land shall bear interest from the date hereof until the same have been paid at the rate of r�ine and tfiree-fourths (9-3/4%) per cent per annum. 9. S;uch assessment shail be payable in ten (10) annual installments payable a�n the first day of January in each year, beginning in the year 1984, and c:ontinuing until all of said installments sfiall have been paid, each install- rtient to be collected with taxes collectible during said year by the County A�ud i tor. 10. 1'he City Clerk is hereby directed to make up and file in the office of the t:ounty Auditor of Anoka County a certified statement of the amount of all " s.uch u�paid assessments and the amount which will be due thereon on the f`irst day of January in each year. PASSEO AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS OAY Q�F , 1983. MAYOR William J. Nee ATTEST: Z`�fi� LERK Sidney C. ►man PoR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL - C�I�;S 20 c�air� rtur�.�ERs 1305fi� - 15�Z08 � � . 21 FAR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL — LIC�'iSES � ._ June 6, 1983 Type of' License: B,�_ Approved By: Fees: Tem ora.ry Bingo Fridley� Lions Club 5231 Ce�ntral Ave.N.E. Fridley�, Mn. 55432 t Sottle� Club North A,ir Home Assoc. 6381 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley�, Mn. 55432 Off Sale Beer Cu b Foad s 240 Os6�orne Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Tem orary On Sale Beer Fridley V.F.VJ. 49er's Days Celebration 1040 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Tiger Booster 512 - 63rd Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Cigarette Chanticlear Pizza 6304 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Country Club 6257 Highway �65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Cub Foods 240 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Food Establishment Chanticlear Pizza 6304 Hwy. �65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Maynard Nielsen Gayne J. Maloney Consumers United for Buying • Bob Eagelsether Kent Waterman RAK Inc. Country Club Mkt.Inc. Consumers United for Buyi ng RAK Inc. Cub Foods Consumers United for 240 Osborne Rd. N.E. Buying .. Fridley, Mn. 55432 . Lynwood Manor II Nurs. Home Lynwood Health Care 5700 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 James P. Hill •� Request Fees Public Safety Director Waivered James P. Hill � Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director $300.00 $60.00 James P. Nill Request �ees Public Safety Waivered James P. Hill Request Fees Public Safety Director Waivered James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P.Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson � �Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector $12.00 $24.00 $12.00 $45.00 �45.00 $45.00 FAR CONCURRENCE 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL -- LIC�'iS�S June 6, 1983 . I ti nere�nt Food Permi t Fridle�� Tiger Booster Tourn. Hockey Booster Members Steven J. Olson 512 - Ei3rd Ave.N.E. Health Inspector Fridle��, Mn. 55432 •� Fridley .49er's Days Fridley Legion Steven J. Olson 6535 jrioka St. ��.E. � Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Refuse Hauler Paul & Andys Disposal Paul N. Eiynck Steven J. Olson 725 - 1109th Ave.N.l•J. Health Inspector Coon R�ipids, Mn. Vendinc� Machine Aamco 1'ransmissions W& W Trans.Inc. Steven J. Olson �940 Ost�orne Rd. N.E. • Health InSpector Fridle��, Mn. 55432 Anderson Truck Coca Cola Bott. Steven J. Olson 7600 CE�ntral Ave.N.E. Health Inspector Fridle�i, Mn. 55432 Automai;ic Engineering Kurt Mfg. Steven J. Olson 7191 Hrry. �65 P�.E. Health Inspector Fridle��, Mn. 55432 Gazda-E3ekins Ploving Coca Cola Bott. Steven J. Olson 7580 N..E. Commerce Ln. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Plywooci Mn. Major Vending Steven J. Olson 5401 E,. River Rd. Health Inspector Fridle!�, F1n. 55432 , Tempor�iry Food Permi t Fridley 49er's �arbara Marvin Steven J. Olson 15709 Hc>ldridge Rd. Health Inspector Wayzata„ Mn. � . 21A Request Fees Waivered Request Fees Waivered �60.00 �25.00 $25.00 $25.00 S25.00 $25.00 $30.00 � 21 3 �J� J F.OR CONCURRENCE 9Y THE CITY COUNCIL - LIC�r�s�s JUNE 6, 1983 B]�ACKTOPP ING Fairfax Asphalt Inc. •2:1832 Sugar Lane Roqezs , t•IIi 55374 By : John Pfaf f . GAS SERVICES A�ABC Appliance & Heating Co. 6]:1 West Lake Street Irli.nneapolis, NIId 55408 By: William Nagel Nartheast Sheet N1eta1, Inc. 4;t47 Central Avenue I�.�. Mi.nneapolis, !Ql 55421 By: D.L. Anderson GEiIdERAL COIJTRACTOR BLiilders & Remodelers, Inc. 3`i17 Hennepin Avenue Mi.nneapolis, ARd 5540F3 D�;�n Right Roofing 6:�11 - 83rd Court 82�ooklyn Park, MN 55445 Er.�zenroth Builders 4e:6 - 2nd Street Ht;idson, WI 54016 Ew•'s Construction 1C�931 Kumquat Cc�on Rapids, 1�4d 55433 By: Nick Terech By: Dennis Nordstrom By: Gre� Enzenroth By: Everett Benson Pa;co, Inc. 75�70 Universi ty Avenue I�. E. Fzidley, tQ1 55432 By: Gerald Paschke T. J. Roofing �k5� Inner Drive Circle Pines, 1�IIV 55014 By: Terry Jorgenson T1a�in City Insulation/iiome Improvement 39�59 - 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55406 By: Virgil Robi St:ar Homes 7E>91 Central Avenue t�.E. FY�idley, NII� 55432 R & M Associates 3+�82 Auger Wliite }3ear Lake, tMl 55110 By: Rodney Damm By: Ray PaLnc APPRONED BY DARREL CLARi: Chief Bldg. Ofc. WILLIAf1 SANDIN Plbg.-Htg. Insp. Y�ILLIAIS SANDIIi Plbg.-Htg. Insp. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldc�. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLAR}: Chief Bldg. Ofc. DP.RREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARf2.EL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARR�L CLARY. Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARR�L CLARK Chief B13g. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg . Of c. Tliorn Construction 6230 - 235t1� Avenuc N.�. DARREL CLARK S�tacy, t�41 55079 By: Dennis Thorn Chief Bldg. Ofc. �� . 21 C �) F.OR CONCURRENCE 9Y THE CITY COUNCIL ' LICENSES .__-� JUt7E 6, 1983 . Yage 2 . HEI�TZNG ' A-1�EiC Appliance & lieating • 61:L West Lake Street Mizineapois, NII•J 55408 By: William Nagel Mlettropolitan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. � 73�30 t�ashington Avenue South � Eden Prairie, 1�4�] 55344 By: Jerome St. t�artin No�ctheast Sheet Metal, Inc. 43�47 Central Avenue N.E. Mi�nneapolis, lR�l 55421 By: D.L. Anderson Ri��hmond & Sons �lectric, Inc. db�3 Golden Valley Heating & Air Cond. 51.32 Wes t Broadway Cr�ystal, tII� 55429 By: S. Follese Ray Ne Welter ileating Co. 4637 Chicago Avenue Minneapolis, I�IIJ 55407 Pz�estige lieating & A/C Inc. 7Et00 tlain Street N. E.. Fi�idley, NRJ 55432 By: Ray Welter Jr. By: Floyd Tenquist v MASONRY Bendiske' Concrete & t4asonry BC�B Johnson Street Anoka, t�IIV 55303 By: Art Bendiske , PL'�BLIC S�7IMt1ING POOL 78�55 East River Road N.�. 1Ei01 North Innsbruck Dr. By: Hirsch-tJewman Co. 600 South Co. Rd. 18 Minneapolis, NII�] 55932 �•7ILLIAtf SW]DIN Plbg.-Iitg. Insp. WILLTA!! SAIdDIN Plbg.-Htg. Insp. WILLIJ4t1 SAP]DIN Plbg.-Htg. Insp. 4�ILLIAt1 SiAt7DIN Plbg.-Iitg. Insp. WILLIN! SAP7DIN Plbg. -11*g. Insp. �JILLIAI9 SANDIN Plbg.-Ht�. Insp. DARREL CIJ1Rt: Chief Bldg. Ofc. STL•17EtI J. OLSOI7 Environmental Of c. By: Innsbruck No. Associates 4600 Lake Road STEVEt7 J. OLSON Minneapolis, MN 55422 Environmental Ofc. 5`i06 Meister Road N.E. By: Innsbruck No. T.H. Assoc. 5506 Meister Road N.E. STEVEN J. OLSON Fridley► t�i 55432 Environmental Ofc. G�AS SERVICES Prestige Heating & A/C Inc� 7800 Main Street N. E. WILLI11A1 SANDIN Fridley, t�II�l 55432 By: Floyd Tenquist Plbg.-Htg. Insp. n � 0 z � F.OR CONCURRENCE 8Y THE CITY COUNCIL -��sES � ...--... June 6, 1983 Page 3 GEI�RAL CONTRACTOR • Du-All Serviee Inc. 3851 Central Avenue U.E. Minneapolis, I+IId 55421 Plillerton U�mber O�. 608 - 2nd Avenue, Suite 1100 P.O. Box 30 Mfnneapolis, I�W 55440 Geo. J. Grant Construction 831 Camo Averwe St. Paul, t�II� 55103 HEATING Faircon, Inc. 80 Second Avenue S.E. New Briqhton, I4� 55112 Midwest Sheet Metal Works 340 Taf t Street N.E. Minneapolis, t�II7 55413 FIREWORKS PERMIT 100 Twin Drive In Theatre, Inc. I-694 & Central Avenue Fridley, MN . u By: Gary Dooner By: Brian Larson By: John Davies By: Andy Ask By: Jay Skarnes By: Gerry Herringer 21D DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofc. DARR�L CLARi: Chief Bldg, Ofc. I�7ILLIAt1 SANDIN Plbg.-Htg. Insp. WILLIAPS SANDIN Plbg.-Htg. Insp. ROBERT D. ALDRICH, Chief, Fire Dept. � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL � � 6, 1983 S�aith, Juster, Feikema, Malaen & Haskvitz 1250 BuilBers Exchange Building Minneapolis, I�N 55402 For legal services rer�3ered as City Prosecutor for the month o� March, 1983 Reys Well Drilling Oo. 413 North Lexington Parkway St. Paul I�I 55104 Final Estimate Repair Well No. 2 Hardrives, Inc. MaF�le Grave �ecutive Genter 720�0 Henlock Lane North MaF�le Grwe, Mn 55369 r"I..L«+� 1N4 � Street Improvenent Project ST.1983-1 Street Impravement Project ST. 1983-2 Ha].verson Construction Ca�any, Inc. 41].9 165th Avenue Wyaming, NA] 55092 0 $9,213.10 $9,542.37 Partial Estitnate #1 Misc. Qoncrete, (�rb & Gutter and Sidewalk C. S. McCYossan, Inc. P.O. H�x AD Os:;eo, Mn 55369 Final Estimates: Street Im�ravenent Project ST. 1982-1 Street Impravenent Project ST. 1982-2 $11,544,37 $46,955.91 $ 5,450.00 $11,755.95 $18,755.47 $ 5,753.00 $58,500.28 0 22 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL �� JOI� 6. 1983 Pa ge 2 Elec�.ric Servioe �ny 160!� Q�icago Avenue Minneapolis, I+�1 55404 Estimate No.2 Fridley Sports Lighting Project Les Jones Roofing, Inc. 941 West 80th Street Miruzeapolis, Mn 55420 Estimate No. 1 Roof Reoonstruction for Crnnbns Filtration Plant Monette Construction C7ar�pany, Inc. 2051) White Bear Avenue St. Paul, Mn 55109 Fstimate No. 2 Fridley Cam�unity Plaza Nob:Le Nursety, Inc. 805!� Central Avenue N.E. Bla:ine, I�A1 55434 Estimate No. 2 Plaza Landscape Project . $54,751.60 $29,728.35 $35,479.65 $11,555.23 22 A :TATEMENT SMITN, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON a HASKV172 ATTORNEVS AT LA�N 1250 9UILDERS EXCMANGE BLDG. MINNEAPOl15, MI�NNESOTA 55402 �J�14�1 rCity of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Attention: Mr. Nasim Qureshi L CJN pATE � M�w�� SfY�M fM�� 0�1�OM ��TM tO�w ��sw• SUBURBAN OFFICE FRIDIEV � � � 6AlANCE FORWARDED f ROV. LAST STATEMENT 5-13-83 For legal services rendered as Prosecutor for the City of Fridley during March, 1983. Representation of Cit of Fridley in court 3-01-83 (Anoka); 3-03-83 (Col. Heights�; 3-07-83 (Anoka); 3-08-83 (Anoka); 3-10-83 (Col. Heights); 3-14-83 (Anoka); 3-15-83 (Anoka); 3-22-83 (Anoka); 3-23-83 (Anoka); 3-24-83 (Col. Heights); 3-29-83 (Anoka) and 3-31-83 (Col. Heights) for 2 jury trials, 35 gross misdemeanor appearances, 151 pre-jury trial conferences, and 70 court trials. (84 hours). Preparation of 98 misdemeanor formal complaints, 12 gross misdemeanor criminal complaints and office conferences with police and citizens. (32 hours). TOTAL TIME (116 hours). March, 1983 Retainer 51,650.00 51,650.00 pATE � �2 SIMITM, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MALMON i MASKV IT2 �r�w.�•� �� , FORWARDED �RO�! tAST SZAlEMENT (86) hours - Time in excess of Retainer. s3,800.00 li1MITM, JUSTER, FEIKEMA, MAI.MON � MASKVIT2 �RMwi�� t �a� � SALANCE �1,650.00 �5,450.00 r : DATE re�eohue�ea: it6�?671 — 61678T2 WATEft PRODUCERS �cis� et rrsai.� 6131 tTni�rsst�r A.�emr f. s. leidlq, Itina�sota SS�32 � INVOICE N0. CUSTONER ORDER V0. 30. �983 a311-1 p3�'i2 -- � us tvo. t,�� 22 � SL Paul. Minn. :�:.iw TERMS: NET 10 DAYS � P/tod/inp in/areit r.la rr!l be eAaro�d on a!! otrr-dm acrnwn/a lull l�uty, Cl��n � Iarp�ct �oQ . R�tinslCall - Iatptr.t Ooltia�n Qhalt�, Qand- Dlast �ad lsiat -, 33 1�ai`• i � �• Dail lrtll - 2S Cu. 2�. 8.11 �r.0 - sstr. z.rn. - u-1�2 cu. Ta..! � es. In�ta;Ll 1/i" llastic �ir Lin� - Disin�Mct W31 - s.st »a.�ias - . Srst�� T�Rias - Nattrl�al llu�b��-B�arina Ias�rts - 33 t= 16. �" �c ].0' Col�an Pip� - 32 t �212. 8^ s s� coi� np. - � � t=iTS• 1-11/1.6" z 10' Lintsha!'� - 2 ! i100. 1-11/]:6" z S' I.intsIIa!'t -, 1 l.�uJi.6� I�afsha� Ci01�i�aaf— 3 �� iZ. s^ : �.o � �tioo rt� - , 8uctic�n 8train�r - C�o�rpl��t� �� of Dovl Ilsa� ta6s !br 10-8t�e Ho�rl bq.- itnests.o�al Bearias. - p e = �s. !Bo+rl b�►. �ras a L2-8ta� t�nit. Miar ��ia�s !br 12-8ta� Darl . /lssesb�],�. - 1 Stui"tiaa-Dw� Bushins - . Dw lun� P'�c�las ' - 1 � �o,►x e�.rc — dtatale�s-8t�l-Iapell�r Ooll�t• - 3Z � = 31. Cl�sa � Paint av+r1 bq. - LOCATIO\ OF V1'ORK Y�11 b. 4 lw.s Ltiaate �o. 1 . . . . A�ovnt ot this Ia�oic� . . i 2.400 132 3,000 1,827 100 iS0 160 100 = S28 6.T84 35� �00 Z� TS �sp • 90 • 80 60 iS 0 315 0 3T� 10 ...... .. ......... : T.�9 �SO i1T.659 ISo �• . �.�� . . =11,755 ti CITY OF i'Rm[.EY Engineering Deparbnent 6431 University Ave.nue, N.E. Fridley, Miru�esota 55432 D�te: t�� , � aa� ..�,_,.., �; qanora�ble Mayor and City Co�a�cil City c�f FYidley 6431 C►niversity Avenue, N.E. i�ridlE.y, Minnesota 55432 22 D �A��a: RE: Est. Nc. 3 (Finall P+er . i�ding _,i�33• , � , Q plpr C. 5. McCrossan P.O. Box AD Osseo, MW 55369 SUN4�FtY: Origi.nal Contraet 1�naa�t tbnt=act Additia�s — Q�ange Order Nos. ____� as Qontract Deductions — �ange Order Nos._r_3__� Aevis�ed Contsact �maast Value Cam�leted To Dnte SZJS ZDTAL Artio�mt Retained �10i) i5�) Less Amo�t Paid Previously l�NDUNT nJE Zi�LS ESTIMAZ£ ��;�� • y.i �� I�: : bl��:, � .. • . �� :. • I hereby oertify that the work performed and the materials supplied to date under tetms of tihe contract fot the refer�ce project, and all authorized changes thereto, have ar� actual value under the oontsact of the an+ounts sham on this estimate (and the final �uantities of the f inal estimate are correctl, and that this estimate is -� just and aorrect and no part of th "Amault Due Ttiis Estinate' has been received. � " Oate r - ?-,�� `r' orized Representative (Title) x;� � y.� �� i�� I hereby aertify that I have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the oontractor is entitled to payment of this estimate �der the mntract for re�erence project. CITY OF FR:[DLEY, II�SP£C'!'�R r` O�ecked 8y�. �!i�// C n�te �i` S' �-3 ReSpeCtfully Stit7mitted, rty o� E'ridley BY ��G. Flora, p.E. ectc�r o� Publ ic Wor ks 22 E 22 F CITY OF FRID[.EY F�gineering Department 6431 University �►venue, N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Oste: � 12T 1983 �+a��. T�: 8onorable Mayor and City Oaa�cil RE: Est. No. � �Final) C�ty iDf FYldley p�, �nding May 12, 1983 6431 1)niversity Averwe, N.E. For C. s. hcCrossan Fridl�ey• !�litV�eSOta 55432 P.O. Box AD Osseo, MN 55369 �Mr1J�RY: Original Contract �naa�t �:Of1tt2lC't A�1t10RS — Q13TiC� OICIEI N06. � �Of1t.tStCt DE�I�C't10tSS — Q1dTl�2 OtaEr I�i06. '1 Aevis�ad Ccntsact �t Va1ue Canpleted To Dete �lB ZtyTPS. Jlmo��t Retaired f00s� (St) , �SS �41f1Ot�1t P81d PrEYlOVSlY �►r�ncrc�r a� �is Fsrn�w� ��;�� : • y,� ��,►i�: : �� ; A = 220_173.98 __ 14,-976.00 =��446. 00 _ �� 65'� _ QR : '177�R6_67 t_ � �Z �a� �=6� -- i -n- _ i- A ��so_76. 5��lO S S Q � I hereby oertify that the Work perforrt►ed and the materials supplied to date �der terms of dhe oontract for the reference project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an act�ial value �der the, o�ntract of the amounts shcwn on this estimate (and the final �quantities of the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and c�rrect and no part Qf the "Amount Due ZY,is Estimate" has bee� received. ., ., . �i Oate l - Z :P� 's Auti 'rio zed Representative (Title) Mx;�� • y.i �� a��; I hereby certify that I have prepared or �camined this estimate, and that the oontractor is entitled to paynr�t of this estimate �der the oontract for reiera�ce project. CITY OF FA:IDLEY, IrISPECTOR - t�� 1 � Q�ecked By�: :. ♦ _� Dete� �— 'Z T � i" � Respectfully �hmitted, City of itic�ey � � . Fiora, P.E. _�Dizector o� Public Works 22 G , llay 12, 1983 To: Public iiorks Director City of Fridley REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ST. 1982-1 E 2 1ie, t;he undersigned, have inspected the above mentioned project and find that the w��rk required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity With the plans and specifications of the project. Al1 deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for Which the city feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agree�3 upon by the contractor. So, therefore, we recommend to you that the city approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the f inal inspection, that being May 12, 1983 0 � Zentgraf, Construction aspec l n ct r presentative, (Title) �_-- 22 H 22 I lsay 12, 1983 0 Street Improvement Project ST 196?-1 � 2 CERTIFICATE OF Tt� CONTRACTOR This is to certify tbat items of the xork shorm in the statement of xork certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $238,617.5u and the final payment of S11,5+�4.37 (19B2-1) and Su6,955.91 (]982-2) for the improvement project Would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the city for all laDor, materials and other work done by the contractor under this project. I dec:lare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. C. S. McCrossan, Inc. . r Co ract epreseniative (Title) � 0