The URL can be used to link to this page

03/12/1984 - 5200OFFICIAL CITY C�tJNCIL AGEI�IDA �iJNCIL MEETII�G MARCH 12, 1984 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: March 12, 198a NAME ADDRESS ' ITEM NUMBER __ - o =_______=�_��____________________:�=/3� ��` __________-______----�-�--. � ��3 9/ � , �� g � ��, � � �.��./ `� g�o- �� ' � S � � � �.-c.,�.�.,,,,� i �' i �.1 ~ � � - :�.G� �� , / , , � �__. !� I�LY� .�,�:-'..0+ , �;�,i ".�j "., ../ � ,.-�",t'rf-:.�'C� ° � �/� / . - _ i..' r. . !�� f I � '�/�t � ��: � W 3S �.�.c� �� DZ�.n,r o r � FRIDLEY CI TY COUNCIL MARCH 12, 1984 - 7:30 P.M. Following are the "ACTIONS TAKEN" by the Administration for your information. f ��3�1�i��ii►i��i�'A Meeting of February 27, 1984 Minutes approved as presented ADOPTION OF AGENDA: ADD: Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the City Administration to Enter into Negotiations to Acquire Property for a Future Park ADD: License for Tim Gro.ve - Tree Trimming � • � � - • ; Complaint on Intra-City Builders Wynn Gubrud thanked the Council . ► Public Hearing on Street Improvement Project 1984-1 (Addendum #1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1 B Hearing Opened at 7:37 p.m. Closed at 7:43 p.m. <,�� , �c.. Council Meeting, March 12, 1984 � r ► Page 2 Consideration of Appointment of New Members to City Commissions (Tabled 2/27/84) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2 D One member appointed others tabled to the next meeting �??�r MANAGER--AGTION TAREN: Letter sent to applicant informing him of Council appoin±r��ent and others are put on the March 26 agenda for further consideration of appointments Consideration of Second Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code by Adopting an New Chapter 109 Entitled "Air Quality" and Repealing Old Chapter 109 Entitled "Air Quality and Solid Waste" in its Entirety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ordinance No. 800 Adopted on Second Reading CTTY MANA ER--ACTION TAREN: Ordinance published in Fridley Sun Consideration of Second Reading of an Ordinance Adopting a New Chapter 218, Entitled "Hazardous h�aste Control," of the Fridley City Code .... Ordinance No. 801 adopted on second reading and publication ordered cTTY MANAGEB--ACTION �NEEDED�= Summary will be put on March 26 agenda for Council approval . . . 3 . . . . . . 4 - 4 J Consideration of Extending Park Construction Crushing Special Use Permit SP #62-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5 B pUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Informed Park Construction of Council approval for extension of one year � � Council Meeting, March 12, 1984 Page 3 � � , : ► ��►�# Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 205 of the Fridley City Code Entitled "Zoning" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 C Ordinance Read on First Reading PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAKErL: Ordinance on March 26 agenda for consideration of second reading Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the City Code of the City of Fridley, Minnesota by Making a Change in Zoning Districts (ZOA #83-04, A1 Fehn) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 A P�BLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance on March 26 agenda for consideration of second reading Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.06 of the City Charter Declaring � Certain Real Estate to be Surplus and Authorizing the Sale Thereof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 B c'FNTRAL• SERVTC£S--ACTION TAREN: Ordinance put on next agenda for consideration of second reading Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code by Amending Chapter 601, Entitled "Municipal Operation of Liquor," Sections 601.07 and 601.08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 B c'FNTRAL• SERVTCES--ACTION_TAREN: OrBinance put on next agenda for consideration of second reading � 0 Councit Meeting, Marcn 1z, 1y�4 � . ► •� � -. Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code by Amending Chapter 602, Entitled "Beer Licensing," Section 602.13, Deleting Section 602.05 and by Adding a New Section 602.05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �FNTRAL SERVTGES--ACTION TF�RErL: Ordinance put on next agenda for consideration of second reading Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code by Amending Chapter 603, Entitled "Intoxicating Liquor," Sections 603.07, 603.10, 603.13, 603.15, 603.18 and 503.22, by Adding Section 603.15, and by Deleting Section 603.04 cF�uTRAt. SERVICES--ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance put on next agenda for consideration of second reading Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Recodif ying the Fridley City Coc3e by Amending Chapter 605, Entitled "Intoxicating Liquors - Clubs," Sections 605.13, 605.15 and 605.17, Deleting Section 605.07 and by Adding a New Section 605.07 and Section 605.14 .. ('F.NTRAT. SF.RVICES--ACTION TARE� Ordinance put on next agenda for consideration of second reading Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code by Amending Chapter 606, Entitled "Intoxicating Liquors - Congressionally Charter Veterans' Organizations," Sections 606.08 and 606.14 and by Adding Sections 606.07, 606.09 and 606.11 �F.NTRAT. SF.RVTCF.S--ACTTON TAREN: Ordinance put on next agenda for consideration of second reading raye � . . . 10 - 10 C . . . 11 - 11 F . . . 12 - 12 D . . 13 - 13 D � f council Meeting, Marcn lz, ly�a ► � ► • � � . - . raye 7 Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code by Amending Chapter 607, Entitled "Entertainment License," Section 607.06 and by Adding Section 607.05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 B �ENTRAL• SERVICES--ACTION TAREN: Ordinance put on next agenda for consideration of second reading Receive Planning Comission Minutes of February 29, 1984 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 15 X A. Vacation request SAV #84-01 to vacate 67th Avenue adjacent to Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Grove Addition, by Curtis Larson ....................................... 15H - 15I Public Hearing was set for April 2, 1984 pOBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Arrangements made for Public Hearing on April 2 B. Item from Appeals Commission Minutes of February 14, 1984 ................................. 15M - 154, Variance to reduce the side yard setback at 6461 & 15R - 15T Riverview Terrace, by Richard Morkrid Variance approved PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAREN: Applicant informed of Council approval � Council Meeting, March 12, 1984 ► � � •� � -. (Planning Commission Minutes Continued) C. Item from Environmental Quality Commission Minutes of February 21, 1984 ....................... 15J Fnvironmental Oualtiy Commissior. Recommendation: & 15U - 15X City Council support the Concept of S.F. No. 1312, "A Bill for an Act relating to solid Waste Disposal Facilities Item tabled PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAREN: Item referred back to Environmental Quality Commission Page 6 Receive Charter Commission Minutes of January 16, 1984. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 E Minutes Received pUBL•TG WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Filed for future reference Consideration of Riverview Park Property Acguisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Submitted for Council Information - No action taken Consideration of Community Developement Block Grant Submittal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18 I PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded with Block Grant with Commissions Recommendation / Council Meeting, March 1Z, 1y�4 ► ► ► •I 1 -• Consideration of Awarding a Traffic Study rayr i . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19 A Contract Approved PUBL•IG WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded with contract with Short Elliot Hendrickson for this study Consideration of a Resolution Ordering Improvement and Final Plans and Specifications and Estimates of Costs Thereof: Street Improvement Project No. St. 1984-1 (Addendum #1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Resolution No. 31-1984 adopted PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded with ordering plans as authorized Consideration of a Resolution Ordering Improvement and Approval of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Street Improvement Project No. St. 1984-1 (Addendum #1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21 A Resolution No. 32-1984 adopted Pi1RT.T� WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded with ordering improvement as authorized Consideration of a Resolution Imposing Load Limits on Public Streets and Highways in the City of Fridley, Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 - 22 C Resolution No. 33-1984 adopted PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded with Imposing Load Limits as authorized . � �ouncil �eeLing, �arcn 1�, ly�g ► � \ • ! 1 - ! rayr a Consideration of a Resolution Appropriating Municipal State-Aid Funds to a Municipal Off System Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 - 23 A Resolution No. 34-1984 adopted gUBLIC WORKS--ACTIOH TAREN: Proceeded with appropriating Municipal State-Aid Funds to Off System Project , Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Subdivision, Lot Split, L.S. #83-06 to Make a New Building Site at 1490 Rice Creek Road N.E. ...... 24 - 24 A Resolution No. 35-1984 adopted pUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded with Lot Split as authorized Appointment: City Employee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Council concurred with appointment of three Officers in the Police Department �ITY MANAGER--ACTION TAREN: Accounting informe3 of new appointees CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR A FUTURE PARR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ADDED ITEM Resolution No. 36-1984 adopted PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded with negotiations for future park property � Council Meeting, March,l2, 1984 Page 9 �+ � ► . ► •� � -• Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Approved ' �ENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAREN: Claims Paid Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 - 27 D License for Tim Grow - Tree Trimming Approved �ENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAREN: Licenses Issued Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 - 28 A Aproved CENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAREN: Estimates Paid ADJOURN: 8:45 P.M. - Receipt � " �a- 5 u s. -- License �i �� = - CtTY OF FRiOLEY. SUBJECT TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT Fii3 LEr. MN ssaa� B�s�+-aoso CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE APPLICATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL F FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA: The undersigned hereby makes application for a license to remove and treat tree� in accordance with Chapter 104 of the City Code of Fridley. .. Fee: s 40.00 License Expires: April 30, 19 E5 Name of applicant: Name of business• Business address: i �M. t h.� 4 arowin re Co. - t ve. .E. Date: , ,� — `t ' g � New Applicat�on� or enewa Business phone num�er: 37�- ��,5 �, Home phone nu Number of employees: � _ I jList below all employees of the company who will be involved with the removal and treatment { !nf trpps� Number of vehicles: Make of vehicle Year Model Y U � Serial number - 6 cense num er Make of vehicle � .� ��,( ear��Model - "U Serial number� Fp ��- �.� ��y c,t�'I�b� License number --4 Make of vehicle Year Model Serial number License number Make of vehic e ear Model Serial number License number Wi�ll applicant or business be using chemicai substances in� an�Y activity related to treatment or disease control of trees, shrubs or vines? Yes No (/ :f S•2s, you rr.c:st file proof with the �?±y C�erk that a��icant or any emplcyee of the aAplicant has been certified by the Agrorlomy Division of the Minnesota Division of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture as a"cortunericial pesticied applicator". Please attach proof that your insurance obligation has been met. For City Use Only: Liability Insurance: 100f300/50 Workmen's Compensation Insurance: Chemical Treatment Requirements:� Yes ✓ No Yes ` No Yes No ✓ Signature of Applicant Parks & Recreation Oirector: By: � Ct• Approved:� Denied: Oate:3�Z-�'y w'�°9as City Council: Approved ✓Denied Date o+��a cy Fnr FYfwrnnl ilca RFSC[,iT!'ION ND. - 1984 RFSQ�VI'ION ALTI�lOiftIZII� �IE CITY ADMINISTRATION TO ENT�R Il�TIt� rIDGOTIATIONS TO A�UIItE PROPIIZZ'Y P+OR A PU'ISJRE P�TtR �EAS, the City Co�cil has determined that there is a r�ed for a City Park in the area bo�ded by Central Avenue on the west, Rice Creek on the north, Stinson Boulevard on the�east and Mississippi Street on the south; and WHERE�S, outlots 1 and 2 in the Gena Rae Ac3dition and the adjacent street and cul-de-sac are essential to the develognent of a City Park in this area. NOC�, �lIItgnRE, BE IT RESQ.VID by the City Council of the City of Fridley that the City A�ninistration is authorized to aoguire outlots 1 and 2 in the Gena Rae Addition and the adjacent street and cul-de-sac by negotiation or oond�nnation for a future City use. pp►.SSID AND ADOF� BY �iE CITY �(INCIL OF �IE CITY OF FRIDLEY T�iIS DIAY OF , 1984. WILLIAPI J. r�E - MAYOR AZ'PF.SZ' : SIDtIEY C. II�4fAt� - CITY CLERK 2/6/17/9 �, ♦ L - � . : �- • .y..�� .: �Xy. � js � ,ie ` .. .:' ' ..•� .. ..'� , ferl� �,� �� .�if.•1 • ` `'f • ,'� ` � - . • .. . � ` . . a.�i ,� � � � •�.y . „ ... . y.1•� •._:: ' y ! :�•:-�. .aCs -Zf ,��`.�.:.5, ', • ��_'� . : � • � �iI � �� ♦ 1 . •.�.�' ��i ,.�..M1 � :J_ `e ' 71��, • � . • .t� . . . � O � - . =`..-�� L•`:}• � .,.a•'� �..�• �L, •�i �. • ��: •�S _� ��' .,�'�• ,i ' �: :i'r:. ��.t� r4:.�' .... s�_ _� � � i,�� ' :� ;`�{ ( • �j�• ; .. • • �: : ,- .. . � =!-�-.. . r �.•:. �.: .'�. .. . J . �b •� :.. Cs .yt, '��. • ' �'� � � t • J • , � ` �� `� ` ' � � �' �� r. � � � �' . ' �i� � ` � ` '� � ' . �' .i J.� . •s �• . �: .�' -�••. � �• �' * � � ,� t • �i''�. �_ .: t''� � �:��, �� f.•7� � •. •�• j • � � -,i�s0 . �j • � ..�;:,�ai: '�'•,'�. ,�, � . a� . ,�� •; �r . T ' T • , � I� _ b F �' •" �s.�� • � ' " �—_ -. �; •1.• �! . • � •�':� ! . �J • ' ` �,1�, t.F s •�. .'�r � y .- f • +`�3�► -, t •�� ,`.�. �i� •• •`' %�t,�'RxC: �Jti '•1'• �.;? i�• �_ ��1 ...�� • if O�, �4 L�� . ' � � •-� ' i•� • � � :., s.� r`�� . �-�_►,.�� IJ'.Mi . — � s. • • = '; '`' . ' ;•`-' '' ''� ' 1'''`' ��.� � '' ' ` . �� ' S, � ' ►aM � �� '�. .. . .� �.:..,..,.�: ..3�- ,��;.�. �. � ,. .. =,.... �.�;. � f�� ► : �r � (� :�� . ' . ^ � � .�; :ti,�. �," �; �,: ;,� � . :<. �;�.. �. . I/��oo� �rv + , �vs� . t• • t '<'' �;• ; '•1�.• �t•' � . . � ,. _ " • .. O `' � � a • , :�1,,,,,.. ,:.;,,�,�:. .: . , . R � � •. ,::�c . . , _ �! • . ' .• ••'Y . � . :i.� ;� . . t• w J. . � � � . � � �6�i: .;�,• I�, ` - _ . -�:' •' . ,, ,, . � � � '- . ' • • • • �/ � . . . � l�� ' �t+Ir � � °�►1. 'r �`• � .['c Q 4 E '� ��'' � . � . . i' � • .♦ �� 6�3 h� � -. � .' � � � � , � � • ' �' �N . , s�l '{ �� . � � • �i� � ��i «76 . - . }� � .i, �'" o � L . � � ,��s� ;.. _ .. _ . . r ,� � �T o': �1 ' � M' � ! �a. . �i• I �i� (ft0� � i • �,. . i.:}•• , � i . .�. 1 I -'- �� . N: � �• �.� , . _�_ _� �'�. ao� � 1 c��, F ,�,., � . � ., � . �.. � � � _• � .,� ♦ w ��it�� -d' .�-• � �'- -;' 's 3 i / .� •��• 1� b�� r,,w � �631 �►� •� . ` ; . .�'' e � � � •. a�� . . < :;. �- '� � p � T � � ,� �,,� ,�. .,�,� �� -. :�. � � �� , �. (r�. - -- - 660 13ts i� � '.. • . ' ••� . � • ( � ��,�,,) . ,�x� 13.�9 13St t�� ►3�S ��> i��f � t i��ao �� . c�,o�__ --�ci�_ � .�+�a " 66 T AyE N . _ � , � ' q ,�,: . . E. . � • % � K. � ° QE rc� �wo _ bse� _ �, � .,s - - Gj,� „ � .,, '� . E . . 1 �c, 9 4 !�� • �.�.�► ' ' � !� � �`* Q`a!n.� ,�� }� ;��p0 � �r R ; s, � �!_ � �.,�: ..,�, � , � � � � �.,.�,,�? ; � �� , z �- a � R I C � NT A I ��'"� ��: _ ' °'",.�, � :; �� '� � -;; �� , `,,�►� NIE �, . � . � � , �_ `'� �� ,, , ` � 0 ,. i y � -� `� _..�� - • � . �aV 'V • .� . ' ,�� ,� fi� /►�O. �L �� ._ (wr�D .. : y .� `� �'J�' � � �V . , fi � ��`. T ' � _ � ';'�1"'�' �j��jl/ ' / . , ' �. ' � . /O�' .. `.' -•� �OS3]• •_ ., .,,,,�'-�'� ';� �i �,►: ' • 5 , �� . �' . : �` � / 4 , �."' . �: ,. : � . _:. �' � �- . � . �{�� ' � �j. ��:',�: �i,��j �� t • . ��_ . .• � - � � .+l.. r''~�'• �"`'� -:�,, ' , �f� !�• . . � �••�•':'"' `'� Q � • � ' r� 9 �'�; � ' '< .�•' � ..4` i i ' : - : , . . . 1 ��, B ��53� hM+ � .• i � • a►- `- _ �� ,, . � . . %�� • `:1` '�r� -. ��.-, s• s. •O , . ,f� -�---- R� � • '�r�l . -� �L � . .i�. , (/ � T � � �� . , �i�. .'�j[S ";,� � ' Y 11 Q � � . ..,�.� . {� � �r -,.. ,+� t � � � � �� .. �' 6'�'� .•� . ��:� � �' �' � " � ° �� t� . � ��; - �«,� � .'�.� � 2 '. 2� ,.. � , ••. � w+ n�� t�1! � � . � �.,.� � . � � L � -.�. , _. _ � � tA9 � . •� • •t � . _ _,� . . ,• . '• •,' f/Y7 �. ,, .:., � � ,R c. / �.:,�� ;. ; '�. ��-i` -_ ^ ��-�• ''`'' : .. ^�'��• � f*'tijr • �� 'C�Yi •'�•`,� . � � �y'' . ,:�.; . ;�.�_ �� . �i� � Z — } ` �.i s ' � ; S _ * % � ►''+'a. .� •' � w r '' � _ "fi' � • � .�i '!ts � •� '� �� i.� - : .�,. :� �+.�� .. w w •�' �'� y � . .;r:'-! - _'� - • •. ` i" . �. . � :i� � �:�� • ` .�'�,:':�" �, . ;� .•: , .�1�� .� :� �� -� i�� K L..�:��.ti�tr��_ � �� .- �� •��_�....�� e � � � .� �'�� ,,,� � %� %s.'='1:: d .: . . � ,'.t �.�.,�,�.� ti� � � . _ . Y.-,. � � � r, . �.�lj�� •rf� �•�• •.� M:+ �� . - .: . � . �;d :+� �•�r,� ...: fs . ,� . �,• ; - �: �. _ . .. , . , ►_ !� . .•-i.. •, �;��;`" ':,�� it" -.�".r;t, � '. •� r,_.. J � .!- �'!ti ��1' !� 1l. i�� T� ' �' • .. • ' - . t �- �" � . � : r,; • . �. � . tj�;.N�}�' �':�i-`� � : �+�' �' . . " :7-_ ' � 4" . ., . �r:�';f�:y,�� ;�:�5 ' '? -• . � � '� � ' • . ` •�,1� �, t ....T _ � « �- COUNCtL MEETING, MARCH 12, 198� OLD B USINESS: PAG E 2 CONSIDERA710N OF APPOINTMENT OF NEW HiEMBERS TO CITY COMM I SS I ONS ( TABLED 2/27/$4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2 D CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY ADOPTING AN NEW CHAPTER 109 ENT I 7LED '�A I R QUAL I TY�� AND REPEAL I Nf OLD CHAPTER 109 ENTITLED '�AIR QUALITY AND SO�ID WASTE�� IN I TS ENT I RETY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING GF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A �EW CHAPTER 218, ENTITLEU ��HAZARDOUS �,�ASTE CONTROL,�� OF THE FRID�EY CITY CODE ,,,,..,... 4- 4 J CONSIDERATION OF EXTENDING PARK CONSTRUCTION CRUSHING SP EC i AL US E P E RM I T SP #82- j 2 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 5- 5 B NEI�� BUS I NESS: CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENT I TLED "ZON I NG° . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 � 0 CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEWD THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FkIDLEY. Ni�NNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS ( ZOA �t83-PJ4. AL FEHN) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 A CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12,06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DEC�ARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURP�US AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 B CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDI.NG CHAPTER 601, ENTITLED "MUNICIPAL OPERATION OF LIQUOR,�� SECT Iotvs 601 .07 AN� 601 .08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 B COUNCIL MEETING, h1ARCH 12. 1984 (�EI�' BUS I NESS ( CONT I NUED) : CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 602. ENTITLED "BEER LICENSING," SECTION 602.13, DELETING SECTION 602.05 AND BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 602.05 ........................... CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 603, ENTITLED "INTOXICATING LIQUOR,�� SECTIONS 603 . 07 , 603 .10 , 603 , i 3, 603 .16 , 603 .18 ANO 603 , 22 , B Y ADDING SECTION 603.15. AND BY DELETING SECTION 603,04 CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF A RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE B 605. ENTITLED "INTOXICATING LIQUORS 605,13, 605.15 AN� 605.17, DELETING BY ADDING A �EW SECTION 605.07 AND N ORDINANCE Y AMENDING CHAPTER - CLUBS,�� SECTIONS SECTION 605.07 AND SECT�oN 605,14 . . CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECOOIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 606, ENTITLED "INTOXICATING LIQUORS - CONGRESSIONALLY CHARTER VETERANS' ORGANIZATIONS," SECTlONS 606.08 AND 606,14 AND BY ADDING SECT�oNS 606.07, 606.09 Atv� 606.11 � � �� PAGE 4 10 - 10 C 11-11F 12 - 12 D 13 - 13 D NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 607, ENTITLED "ENTERTAINMENT LICENSE," SECTION 607.06 AND BY ADD I NG SECT I ON 607 .05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 B RECEIVE PLANNING COMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 29. 1984 ............................ 15-15X A. VACATION REQUEST SAV #84-01 TO VACATE 67TH AVENUE ADJACENT TO LOT 1. BLOCK 1. OAK RIDGE ADDITION, BY CURTIS LARSON ....................................... 15H - 15I PIANNING COMMISSION_RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL �OUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR APRIL 2. 1984 � B. ITEM FROM APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 14, 1984 ................................. 15P� - 15Q, VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK AT 6461 $ 15R - 15T RIVERVIEW TERRACE, BY RICHARD MORKRID APPEALS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL COUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION, r COUNCIL MEETaNG. MARCH 12. 1984 � : • � (PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CONTINUED) PAGE 6 C. ITEM FROM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION h11NUTES OF FEBRUARY 21, 1984 ....................... 15J ENVIRONMENTAL QUALTIY CQMMISSION RECOMMENDATION, b �5U - 15X CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT THE CONCEPT OF S.F. N0. 1312. "A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES COUNCIL ACTION NEEDED: CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION. RECEIVE CHARTER COMMISSION P1INUTES OF �ANUARY 16, 1984. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 E CONSIDERATION OF RIVERVIEW PARK PROPERTY ACQU I S I T I ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPEMENT BLOCK GRANT SUBM I TTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18 I. COUNCIL MEETING, MARCH 12. 1984 . : • � PAGE 7 CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING A TRAFFIC STUDY ......... 19 - 19 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND F1NAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET (MPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ST, 1984-1 (ADDENDUh1 #1 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. ST. 1984-1 (ADDENDUM #1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21 A 0 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IMPOSING LOAD LIMITS ON PUBLIC STREETS AND HIGHWAYS IN THE CITY OF FR I DLEY , M I NNESOTA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 - 22 C COUNCIL h1EETING, MARCH 12, 1984 1 � �► 1 • ► � PAGE 8 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MUNICIPAL STATE-AID FUNDS TO A MUNICIPAL OFF SYSTEMPROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 - 23 A CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.S. �`83-06 TO MAKE A NEW BUILDING SITE AT 1490 RICE CREEK ROAD N.E. ...... 24 - 24 A APPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 C�a iMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 I L�CENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��. . . . . . . . . 27 - 27 D EST IMATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 - 28 A � THE P1INUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL PIEETIPJG OF FEERUARY 27, 198Q TEIE MINUTFS OF THE RF�nAR �� OF THE FRIDL�EY CITY aDUNCIL OF �`�,ii[JARY 27. 1984 �he Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:30 p. m, by Mayor Nee. �LF�E OF ALLDGIANCE• Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the f lag . j�JLL C1�LL: � I�P'IBERS PRESII�: Mayor Nee, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Hamernik Councilman Fitz�trick and Councilman�Barnette i� r �;_ � : �+ . - . • • ,� L� • �l 1!�!_. � +- ��i 1� �_ �. ? � �'�� MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. :_� � � • � • ; �►�� • MOTION by Counci].m-in Barnette to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. [� ' �+� �1�:� � � �� Mr. Leonard Moore, 8301 Riverview Terrace, laws pertaining to the pickup of garbage. the Inspection Dep�rtment give a 24 hour picked up or else they would be cited. He at 8316 East River Road hadn't been picked the Inspection Degartment to react. stated he would like stricter He stated he would like to have notice that garbage had to be stated he reported that garbage up and it took several weeks for Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated the City can issue a complaint if they find a violation, but once the co�nplaint is issued, the City has no control over the amount of time it takes to process it. He stated if the person who receives the citation would plead not guilty, there would be a substantial delay. He stated the only thing the City would have control over is to try to have the Inspection Department out as soon as possible when a complaint is received. Mayor Nee stated the City may be able to issue a citation sooner, but a misdemeanor is the only penalty the City can impose. Mr. Moore stated there is an ordinance in the City which states garbage will be picked up once a week and this should be enforced. Mayor Nee stated the City wants it enforced, however, he couldn't at this time tell what had happened in the case to which Mr. Moore referred and why it wasn't acted on sooner. �r, a►. ,�i� ��, • ��: �� , �+ • ; . �s a= �i � � N►. M��'I�i►� �� N►l �� .a !� r� s's_ �. � � �4� �! ��/�+4 � ' C • ' : � �� \1�_ ►l , � �.��.� ��' • ' � ' - �_ � C Mayor Nee reopened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. on Street Improvement Project 1984-2 pertaining to 73rd Avenue. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated at the last meeting on February 6, a nurnber of persons objected to the improvement of 73rd Avenue and to insure that all parties notified of the hearing had adequate time to resp�nd, the public hearing was continued to this evening. Mayor Nee stated the proposed assessment for the improvement of 73rd Avenue is $76.82 a front foot for the street and $11.74 a front foot for the bikeway/walkway. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated when 73rd was originally developed, the construction was staged and the final improvement was held because most of the property along this street was not developed. He stated the property naw from Able Street to Old Central is f ully developed, but between the east service drive of T. H. 47 and Highway 65, it is not fully developed. Mr. Qureshi stated this portion of the improvement could be held until there is full development, if the Council wished. He stated, if the Council desired, some of the cost of the improvement could be funded through State Aid funds. He stated, normally, most of the costs for a bikeway/walkway have been gaid by grant monies. Mr. Qureshi stated staff would be comfortable suggesting the City pay one-third of the cost of the improvement, with two-thirds of the cost assessed to the property awners. He stated this would make the cost at about $59.00 a front foot. Mr. Semore Nelson, 895 73rd Avenue, asked if any of the costs for this improvement would be assessed to the property owners on the north side of 73rd. Mr. Qureshi stated there is no plan to assess property owners west of Highway 65 to the north, as they w�ere assessed for the service road. Mr. Nelson stated he understands the proposal is to block off the one-way at Baker Street and stated he had no objection to it. He stated the proposal to extend Able Street into 73rd woulc7, he felt, make an extremely hazardous intersection. He stated on the east side of Able Street there are double bungalaws and all of them have garages facing Baker Street so they rarely use Able Street for parking or entrance to their homes. He stated he understood �rt of the reason access is wanted f rom Able onto 73rd is to relieve the congestion at Jackson Street. He stated there is very little traffic east of Jackson Street. He felt this would be an �� 1�. v�� . • �I: ;..: ;� ' ' • � !! extremely expensive project which wouldn't accamplish anything. He felt to relieve the congestion at Jackson Street, another intersection should probably be put in by the park or at Memory Lane. He stated putting another entrance at Able would make it so close to Baker Street and the service drive coming frm the Target warehouse. Mr. Nelson pointed out there isn't a single stop sign between University and Highway 65 on 73rd and if the City wants to make it saf e, there probably should be a stop sign at Jackson. He stated he has not seen any traffic jams on 73rd and questions if any improvement has to be done at all. Mr. John Zimmer, Engineering Department of Chicago-Northwestern Transportation Company, stated they received notice this af ternoon regarding the hearing and would like to be on record that they object to any assessment on this street. Mr. Zimmer stated a letter had been sent to Council regarding their objection. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to receive the letter from Q�icago-Northwestern Transportation Company. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Qureshi stated staff's reco�nendation would be that the area between University up to Able Street be delayed until there are f irm proposals regarding developnent of the properties on the south side of 73rd Avenue. Mr. Don Spano, 7300 Jackson Street, asked if this plan is adopted as originally proposed would any other items such as stop signs, buff er zones or street lights be added. Councilman Hamernik stated if it was an item that would be assessed, it probably wouldn't be changed; hawever, if there are items which are not normally assessed, there could be changes made at any time. Mr. Spano stated he has some concern living on the corner of 73rd and Jackson as there is increased traffic and they have a safety problem at this intersection. Mr. Qureshi stated the City has complete records on happenings at every intersection and constantly study them. He stated the improvement proposed was to narraw some of the road to better control the traffic. He stated if this improvement is not adopted, as proposed, the City would study this intersection further in conjunction with the two larger parcels on the south side of 73rd. Mr. Spano stated his problem with the street is the right-of-way and safety. Mayor Nee stated the problem has been discussed and if the improvement c]oesn't proceed, it may have to be considered separately and have f urther study. Q)iINCIL NIEETING OF F'EBRUARY 27 , 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. Vern Ever�mo, 1223 73rd Avenue stated he didn't see anyt,hing wro w th the street. He state he hasn'� heard anyone who is in f avor o� t�e improv�nent. He stated the method of assessment seems unfair as where they are located they can be assessed on both sides. He fe].t the improvement wouldn't add any value and it was a little pre-mature. Mr. John Jenson, Minnesota Transfer Railroad Company, stated he voiced objection at the last meeting and would support staff's position that the p�rt of 73rd which is undeveloped be deleted at this time. Mr. John Buzick, 1201 73-1/2 Avenue, stated no one wants the street and everyone feels the street is good quality and doesn't see a large traff ic volimie where they are located. Mr. Jim Zeglin, representing Determan Welding, stated he was speaking on behalf of his boss who was on vacation. He stated he thinks everyone who is going to be assessed is in agreement that there is no need f or this improvement. He stated the bikeway/walkway path itself is a City project for the entire City to use and should not be paid for just by the property awners where the bikeway/walkway is located. He stated they would be taking 20 feet of their property for the bikeway/walkway and that is enough. Mayor Nee pointed out the question on haw the improvement is to be assessed is a separate hearing and the hearing this evening is to determine if the improvement should be done. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated this road was developed over ten years ago and the plan, at that time, was not to build it to full standards because most of the property wasn't developed. He stated if the City wants to protect what they have already invested in the street, it is better to build naw and bring it ap to industrial standards. He stated aZl the properties are developed so there is no reason to wait. He felt if the improvement is ever going to be done, it should be done as soon as possible. Mr. Qureshi stated the improvement would be assessed in 1985 and go on the tax rolls for 1986. Zhe property owner would have the option to pay the assessment in a l�unp stan or to pay over a 10 year period at an interest rate between 9 to 9-1/2�. Mr. A1 Qualm, 399 73rd Avenue, asked what would happen if they didn't do the improvement right naw. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the majority of 73rd Avenue cbesn't have the final mat so the base has been wearing wer the years. He stated a large amount of surface gravel has worn away and if they don't save that base naw, there would be the tendency to lose everything and require a whole new base. Mr. Flora stated once the water gets under the asphalt, it erodes the gravel so you have to start with a new base. He stated if this happens, the costs would increase about 50�. /�i �+� M.��i_ N+. � ��! f�. i f. �• ��H Mr. Zeglin asked if 73rd was a State Aid street. Mr. Qureshi sated if was a State Aid street and eligible for State Aid funding. He stated the policy the City adopted is to put State Aid monies into a fund for the maintenance of all streets in the City. Mr. Zeglin stated the property awners will be assessed for the street and the money the City receives for this im�roveqnent would be put into a fund to maintain all State Aid roads. Mr. Zeglin stated what they want is a big, wide roadway which will end with a"buggy trail" going into Moundsview and it doesn't make sense, as it seems what is there naw is adequate. Councilman Barnette stated what staff was proposing is a compromise to reduce the cost of the improvement to the property awners in orc3er to make it reasonable. He felt you also have to look at it fram the point that it will happen anyway in the future, and at a higher cost than what it would be naw. Mr. John Buzick stated he understands what Councilman Barnette is saying, hawever, their problem is they are still paying the assessment on 73 1/2. He stated they will also be filling a ditch that serves the entire City on a tax forfeit property that was sold by the County. He stated the improvement isn't necessary for the persons f ronting on it, and would be actually for people who aren't located on it. He felt the street is a State Aid street and the funds for this improvement should be paid from these monies. Councilman Schneider stated he felt Mr. Buzick's argtanent that the street would be for people who aren't actually located on it could be made in every instance of all streets. He stated they do however, have a unique situation where they front on two streets. He stated the policy adopted is everyone pays and benefits f rom the street. He stated certainly their businesses couldn't survive if the roads aren't there so it is a spreading of charges far all. He stated, ultimately, all roads have to go in and someone has to pay for them. He stated the State Aid funds they use benefit everyone so when streets have to be maintained you are not assessed again. Councilman Schneider stated he felt the City's policy is consistent with what has been done with other roads in the City. Mr. Buzick stated he felt the City has an inteqrity problem where they have the property awners pay for the streets and also collect State Aid funds so the City can have the money right away. Mr. Vern Ewer�no felt they w�ould be subsidizing the street for others in the co�nunity as people between Highway 65 and University didn't pay for the road. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this street improvement project. M�JTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:35 p.m. �� 1�, � �� ' � •_�. : i _ '_. • 2. A1ST.T(• HE.ARTNG ON A P'FtOPC�SID O INANCE AME1�IDj Q�APZ�R 2OS (�F THE RTnT Fj� CITY QODE ENI'ITLID "ZONING" • M�TION by Councilman SGhneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:35 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated when the Uniform Building Code was adopted by the City, there were some f ire protection requir�nents that were not incorporated. He stated a change was prepared in the Zoning Code to add the fire protection procedures to provide necessary sprinkler systems for all new construction. Mr. Flora stated when the Planning Co�nission was reviewing the ordinance, there were several other items they recommended be changed in order to clarify certain criteria. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated this ordinance provides that buildings in excess of 8,500 and 10,000 square feet would be required to have sprinklers. He stated it was felt this was a farily reasonable requirement which meets the needs of the property awners and proper balance for f ire control and suppression. Mr. Dick Harris, 6200 Riverview R�errace, stated he had a discussion with the Fire Chief and this ordinance seems reasonable, and he has no objection to it. He felt the City was approaching it in the right way to have this item handled in the Zoning Code. He felt it would probably benefit a lot of the snall building awners and help in their particular situations. Mr. Harris questioned what other changes were made in the code. Mr. Flora stated Sections 205.13 through 205.18 add the words "and equipment" which applies to all conm�ercial and industrial districts. Mr. Flora stated under Section 205.18, repair garages and auto service stations are added to be allaaed in both an M-1 and M-2 zone. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed ordinance amenc�nent . MOTION by Councilman Barnette to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8 : 45 p. m. 3. P[�r,rr HF'.ARTnir` nN 1� FINAL PLAT. #83-01, WESTERN RIDGE ESTATES , BY ALLAN FEHN: MDTION by Councilman Scl�neider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:45 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated there are three different issues associated with this plat and, in addition to the plat, there is a rezoning request and a variance request. �� J�� . • ��±: ;. � ; . . . i �y � Mr. Flora stated the plat is for property located on Hillwind Road and calls for the construction of a duplex and a six plex on the property. Mr. Flora stated there is a request for the City to provide some turnback property to the parcels from which it was originally taken for right-of-way. He stated a portion of the turned }aack property would revert to Lot 2 and another portion would revert to Lot 1. Mr. Flora stated because of the steep bank, it would be very difficult to c3evelop this property without the turnback of the property from which it was originally taken. Mr. Flora stated the property is layed out so, in the f uture, it could be considered for condominitans. He stated water can be extended to service this development, but there would be a requirement to provide a forced sewer system to pump uphill. He stated there is some concern about drainage to the north because of the steep slope. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Co�nission recomanended approval of the plat with seven stipulations, which he outlined. Councilman Schneider stated he talked with Mr. Fehn and he has constructed the duplex i�nediately to the east of this proposed plat. He stated some of the drawings proposed are, basically, the same aesthetically and this seems like a unique solution for a difficult property. He stated it looks like this would be a development that would be attractive to the City. No persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed plat. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unani.mously and the public hearing closed at 8 : 55 p. m. 4. �TBLI� EARING ON REZO ING REOUEST. ZOA #83-04, WESTERN RIDGE ESTATES. BY AL,L,AN FEHN • M�TION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:55 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the existing zoning lines are not aligned with the property lines and the zoning request bef ore the Council is an attempt to realign the zoning lines in accordance with property lines and to rezone the property. The request is to rezone the portion at Lot 1 to R-3 that is not already zoned R-3 and to rezone Lot 2 to R-2 that is not already zoned R-2. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Cor�nission has recommended approval of the rezoning. No persons in the audience spoke regarding this rezoning request. ��. 1�� !� _� �,. � i�' �' -: 's. �� ': N �� MDTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:56 p.m. 5. pLiRT T(' �ART�; ON THE AMENDr4ENP OF REDEV�I�PMEI�TI' PRO�TECT NO 1. MODTFyTNG T'►' BY ENL�ARGEMENT. AI�ID THE RIDEVEIAPMEN� PLAN REIATING Tf�RF.'�: M7I'ION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:56 p.m. Mr. Irnnan, City Clerk, stated the public hearing is to include a number of parcels in the enlargement of Redevelopment Project No. 1. He stated this would enable the use of tax increnent financing and to include this area in a tax increment district. Mr. Irrman stated, with the problems in financing of industrial developnent, � the staff reconunended to the HRA that, at the time the Paschke property was included, to also include other parcels which may need help in developing. He stated by enlarging Redevelognent Project No. 1 it merely sets in place one of the things needed for potential developnent. He stated the HRA, by adoption of resolution No. 1-1984 has reco�nended approval. He stated the Planning Co�nission also found this campatible with the Comprehensive Plan and past resolution #1-1984. Councilman Hamernik asked the total area which will be included. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the major two pieces are the two railroad parcels which is about 77 acres and the rest is another 30 or more acres. Mr. Dick Harris, 6200 Riverview Terrace, stated he has previously stated his position about freezing the taxes and the windfall the HRA gets by freezing taxes. He stated he felt the Council is setting a bad precedent. He stated they have to face the issue that they are narrowing the tax base for the schools, if they put all the undeveloped land into a tax increment district. He stated in the referendtmts that money doesn't fall back to the school districts, but back to the HRA and didn't really think the I�tA needs it, but the school district does have the need. He felt at some point in time the Council has to face this issue. Mayor Nee stated he felt all the Council was sensitive to this issue. Mr. Harris stated no one does anything about it and thinks in several years the school districts will use up the monies they have and will be talking about another referend�un. M�TION by Councilman Hamernik to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:02 p.m. ��;1►. u� ��. • ��' � ' ' - :. : � ' Y �' *�_-� C._ �. � ► �. ��.«�?�u �� . _ �. � 4. 4 ih . MOTION by Council.man Barnette to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:02 p.m. Mr. Inman, City Clerk, stated this hearing covers the establishment of tax incr�nent financing district No. 5 on the Paschke property. He stated, due to soil conditions on the property, assistance was required f ram the HRA in the amount of $30,000 in order to develop the parcel. He stated the HRA has approved and recanunends Council approval. He stated, at the current time, an eight year redevelopnent district is recommended. Mr. Inman stated letters were sent to the County and School District notifying them of this proposed district, however, no response was received. He stated staff recommends approval to tax increment f inancing district No. 5. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated it is up to the HRA each year to determine whether they have this development or not and if development would occur without this incentive. Gouncilman Hamernik stated he had quite an extensive discussion regarding this item and for the HRA to be paying only a small portion of the total cost to bring this property up to standards is a p�rtial incentive and Mr. Paschke will be absorbing most of the cost. Councilman Schneider stated he concurs with Mr. Harris' comments and f elt the windfall from the discretionary levy should be turned back to the schools. Mr. Qureshi stated staff was in agre�nent and has made this clear to the i�A. MfJTION by Councilman Hamernik to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:08 p.m. • � : ,i �� _ � �s � � � _ � i�� _ ,. � i � � � � _ ►��_ � �� . �r� ��.�� ' ��' �. 4 �� M.��4_C 1' �� ; �, �� C -i �. • � «..�� ' �I�� _ a�� i G � � _ � �i� � �� .�. �� - �!►� : �� Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the Environmental Quality C�w�anission reviewed the environmental ordinances and found the existing C2iapter 109 has most of the solid waste items included under chapter on solid waste. He stated they are, therefore, recommending cleletion of these portions except those statutes which pertain to air quality. He stated the Planning C,o�►ission has reviewed this and concurred with the Environmental Quality Commission and what is naa before the Council is the recommended change to Qzapter 109. ��.1�� -- y�,. • ��1:''-:'� �:. � Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated the State statute would be in effect also, but the City could prosecute under its awn laws. Councilman Schneider asked if rgnoval of the sections minimizes the City's ability to enforce it. Mr. Flora stated these are already incorporated into the solid waste ordinance. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated as far as air quality, the City can prosecute under the State statutes; however, if you prosecute under the City ordinance it would be a misdemeanor, which isn't the case if prosecuted under State statutes. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. �I�ISTDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF NEW MEMBERS TO CITY COMMISSION ('T'ABL.ED 2/6/84) : PARK AI�ID REC�2EI�TION Q'k'Il�4ISION: Councilman Fitzpr�trick nominated Lennie Moore for appointment. He stated he had contacted Jan Seeger and she does not wish to be reappointed. Councilman Barnette nominated Steve Nelson. There being no f urther nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table action on these nominations until the next meeting. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. POLICE OON'IlKISSION• Councilman Barnette nominated Tim Breider to serve on the Police Co�ur�ission. 'Ii�ere being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to cast an unanimous ballot f or the appointment of Tim Breider to the Police Commission. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINFSS• 9. RFCEIVING CATV ADVISORY QOPM4ISSION MINUTF�S OF JANCTARY 19. 1984: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the Cable Television Co�unission meeting of January 19, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �� . � �±� ��. . ��,. . . . . . - �--_ �. � ; «_ ��. � _; �I� �. !� �� _ • � � ��l �4 • �� C. .� ; ' �;� .��1 �l�+� :�� 4 �!�►� . �� _�� _� !� �� • � u �; �+4 _ • ; �l = � - - �'� ��►� �� _�� • �. •_ 4�l� !��c� • � � !� �1��! ' • � : �,!! �i� ��,i� a±� �� •!.1�� _' ��L� • �� , z�4__� 1 • �►� a�� . : �. _� M i,l� � ' � � .� /1* �_�_� � � i �� y� : � \� � � 4.� � _ � i ��\� +. z • •�, � ! �_ _ �i� ��.1�. _ �_�+�i: _� �S � �4�� y.l_ �/z . � �. .!� 4 : � ' ?!�l�� • � • � �'�! �4 � �is item was previously acted on by Council with the first reading of this ordinance early in the evening. Mr. Flora reported to the Council that he had attended the seminar. ��! ��!�M ' �� _ Mi_: •\ �� •+ �_ ��yJ�[�1,1�= •� �•'�.�jL: - y: �� . : � \� \ y�l MDTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Ca�unission to approve the policy on ice locations for the City. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Councilman Hamernik asked what date the list would be establishged for the locations of the ice rinks. Councilman Barnette stated the Commission had indicated they would review the p�st year's evaluation at their March meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN 0�1 2%iE A�pVE MDTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. C. RF�'EIVING APpEAIS aDNII�4ISSION MINUTES OF _JANCTARY 3? . 1984: C-1. ��.RTA��'S FOR F'RONr YARD ADID RE�AR YARD SEI'Bl1QCS A1�ID THE PTANTTTI(� $TRTP. BY P�AU FEfIDI. 125� HTL�??I�ID ROAD: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated these variances are requested in conjunction with the hearings on the plat and rezoning which the Council reviewed earlier this evening. He stated there is a need for a variance to reduce the front yard setback from the required 35 feet to 25 feet; to reduce the required rear yard setback for a driveway from 5 feet to 1 foot; and to reduce the required 15 foot planting strip between different zones to 1 foot. Mr. Flora stated the Appeals Co�nmission has recommended approval of the variances with a stipulation on the rear yard setback that a guardrail be installed at any location where the retaining wall exceeds 30 inches in height and that the planting strip variance only applied to about eighty feet of the property line. �ese items are to be formally acted on by the Council at the time the readings of the plat and rezoning are considered, but the administration wanted the Council to be aware of the variances requested. •� 1�. . ,�iala� 1�. � �!�!= C+. .� ��. ' ' ' _'�� L.1 _S. +�� / � V1' � �� T� _7T T +I, f /�1 � !1\, �� . • 1., ��! � �1 t ,�, L' �� L� • !� 4 � • �� I�� . 4 � � • 1 � _ M «; �, ;,� i� � ' � �� . !� �l _ • � 4�� C,� � �l " ' � �_ • ' : 4_\ �. �: � : « «: �� ;�!: � � Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, statecl this is a request for a lot split to make a new building site at 1490 Rice Creek Road and, in conjunction with the lot split, sane variances are also requestecl. Mr. Flora stated the variances are to reduce the required lot width fram 75 feet to 73 and 74 feet and to reduce the average f ront yard setback f rom 107 feet to 50 feet. Mr. Flora stated the Planning Co�unission and Appeals Ca�nission considered the requests and no objections were made at either of these meetings. Mr. Flora stated the Co�miissions reconanended apprqval with stipulations on the lot split. MQTION by Councilman Barnette to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Co�unission and approve lot split, LS #83-06 with the following stipulations: (1) a 15 foot bikeway/walkway easement along Rice Creek Road; (2) payment of the park fee; (3) all three lots must be recorded at Anoka County before any permits are issued, and (4) all street, sewer, and water assessments for the new lot be paid. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and approve the variance request to reduce the required lot width fram 75 feet to 73 and 74 feet and to reduce the average f ront yard set back from 1Q7 feet to 50 feet as requested by Mr. Allan Singer. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated he wanted to make sure Mr. Singer was aware of possible assessnents for the road improvement, assessments for sewer and water, and payment of the park fee. Mr. Singer stated he understood there would be some assessments for the sewer and would like th�n deferred until the lots are built on and/or sold. Mr. Qureshi stated his major concern is that the City receive a letter fram Mr. Singer indicating he is aware of the potential assessments on Rice Creek Road and that he passes this information on to whoever buys those lots. Mayor Nee felt this should be handled as a separate issue and for Mr. Singer to submit it in writing for action either by administration or, if necessary, the Council. N�TION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Planning Coc�snission meeting of February 8, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee cieclared the motion declared unani.mously. ��.1�. �i�±��. • �1�-. �� . . . •�N : `_• • � � � : ' � � � 7 �' �� • � �� z� . �!� u �I�! ��+ � �i � � _� � � �. ��.M��d ��__ �� l�. � �L ! �� ?�� Ms. Stephanie Jones, Attorney representing the Legislative Counsel, appeared before the Council regarding a bill to amend Minnesota statutes pertaining to incentives for new developnent. Ms. Jones introduced Mr. Don A�3ams and Mr. Nonaood Nelson representing the Onan Corporation. Ms. Jones stated of the many groups she has discussed this bill with, the City is most familiar with Onan's history. She stated Onan currently enploys 1,800 workers in Fridley and the c:o�npany is faced with the decision as to where to expand. She stated the City is already aware of the need for additional space for their engineering personnel and Onan plans expansion at an estimated cost of $10,000,000 and the company wants to update its manufacturing systems and would spend over $5,000,000 ta do so. Ms. Jones stated the Board of Directors hasn't made a decision whether to expand in Fridley. She stated when Onan was faced with decisions about expansion, it demonstrated its concerns to the State. Ms. Jones stated Onan also has a facility in the south and two factors make it very attractive to expand at that location because of waiver of the sales and use tax and the absence of any real estate taxes. Ms. Jones stated the bill addressed in the House by Representative Simoneau essentially is enabling legislation. She stated this proposed legislation would allaw a City to grant an exemption on property taxes and this would apply only to new construction and limited to a f ive year period. She stated the exemption is at the discretion of the City. She stated the value and assessments on existing improvements wouldn't be affected and they would remain stable. Ms. Jones stated the City wouldn't lose any revenue it naw derives f rom the property taxes and would obtain additional revenue when the new construction was put on the property tax rolls after five years. Ms. Jones stated in regard to fiscal disparities, the provision in Minnesota statutes would take this out of the formula so monies that would be included in f iscal disparties wouldn't be included for those f ive years. She stated the bill also exempts fram the sales and use tax, all equipment and supplies for a f ive year period and provides reduction in sales tax for purchase of capital equipment. Ms. Jones stated she felt the long-term interests of the City are served by the bill and protects the residents' interests in the City. She requested the City's support of the bill on behalf of Onan. M�JTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 1 8-1984. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votig aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ��: ��. ��. • ��-_ c� : �+ • ' .i� t :_ � .1�_ �\ ►� • � � , :.l�y�� ,. i � iN:_ �'� �� 4� y.� i 4 � 4 �i�� :`:�L ' �� ': \ \�� s � 1 1 1 : �__i �t , _ i �l + i � � : s = � � � • -�!� 1 : �� MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 19-1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � : _`_� . • � � � 1 • : � • ; � �i�_ y�. ��' :��'� ��i ' ' �C�� L� � � �_�� : �i� • ; � �1� N�. � � �� '�!_��I� �� 's � M�� «� �� ' ' ��4_��+ • M\�_ : �I� � ` � �. _ : � �� . MDTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 20-1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � _ � . ��, \ � � � ' � � . � \. �� \ � �� * H�► ' �,�� ' � �.� � _� � i� �� MrJTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 21-1984. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . . ;_ � •� �� :� •,_� C_� ': �� - �-� .s ► �� ,' • �I�._ �� ■ �_ • ��_ ' � � L �1� ' i � • ; , z�� MQTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 22-1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . :_ � . �� • ' �' L �. . ': �' G y�� =_�!1 � � �� *�— : � �. � + yr�_ �!' ��i � y*� �� _ � + � � � ' � ' � � \� �' �l��!��l�'��\� �C!� � � ' S ' ' � � �J�I� J � MDTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 23-1984 and set the public hearing for March 12, 1984. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. : ; � •�, ,• .. �� '�• �_ �� . . .� �� • • � • �I� 1 • • �� - ,I_�1�_�• �I� ' ��/��+ ' C • ,� •., M�TION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 24-1984. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. MDTION by Councilman Hamernik to amend Resolution No. 24-1984 by deletion of that portion of the improvement of 73rd Avenue between T. H. 47 (University Avenue) and Able Street. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ��.1+. y�� . • ��=_;. � � _ • • •,.,t! �•'� UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKIIJ ON ZHE MAIl�1 MOTION, a�l voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �_ � •+ �� •• �L� , M_�� _ \M i\�� i"+� i � i-\ i.�� • ; � �� : •!��?�C �!�_?�� ; : ��• 4� � �� :��l�� ►� �.�� l�� ►! ' ' Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated if it is the Council's desire not to proceed with the improveqnent of 73rd Avenue between T. H. 47 (University Avenue) and Able Street, the resolution oould be amended. MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 25-1984. Secondec7 by Councilman Schneider. MQ'I'ION by Cuncilman Hamernik to amend Resolution No. 25-1984 by deletion of that portion of the improveqnent of 73rd Avenue between T. H. 47 (University Avenue) and Able Street. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON �iE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � �_�� . �► �� • ��' :.�\�� ,� �� _ �� .,�� 1�� J,, i�i +r 1 � �_ � ��. . �! � �� +� L��1 � . \ � � � . �N. � .L� 1 _ ,� �� MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 26-1984. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 1 ;_ • �` ,• .�, �..�• � ._ ��_�M • � C � � � \� :\I� �._ :�� •\ � : i� ��M��' �� \i.�i _�. ' i\ ��_�� \ �?�� L � ',��\� ' i!� �. •� � � � �.. i�_ � *�, . MOTION by Councilman Hamernik to adopt Resolution No. 27-1984. Seconc�d by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ; .� . r • ► ► � � : , �� . .. �� :_ • � :_ � �� . MOTIQN by Councilman Fitzp3trick to adopt resolution No. 28-1984. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �_ � �, �.� • •�i i.t7��._ �. i..�.� �+ ��\ i ��1��_ .fi.+� �ff!� 7�f ,� �i��. �1-� � �' C�!4� ��,� • 4.� �,� �� _� • � M�TION by Councilman Barnette to adopt Resolution No. 29-1984. Seconded by Council.man Schneider. Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated he wanted to make sure the Council is aware of the area for which they are requesting the grant. He stated they wish to correct the existing bikeway/walkway system all the way from the ��.�\� �t��!� �,. � i��_�..� �� ;� � *- � Center City to Springbrook Nature Center. He stated if a grant is received, 75$ of the funding cames fram the State and the City contributes 25$ . Councilman Hamernik questioned if there was enough roo�n in the right-of-way for this system. Mr. Flora stated there is a adequite amount of right-of-way to c�nplete the bikeway/walkway system. UPON A VOICE VOTETAKF,'N ON Z4iE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ��, �� ' � \ � :J�__� ��l��+� �� i _�� _ '� � � � ; • : �I� �� Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the City annually schedules three or four wells for repair each year and specifications have been prepared for wells #6 and #8. - He stated they are looking at increasing these wells capacities and funds are available in the Utility Fund. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize the advertisement for bids for the repair of wells #6 and #8. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 24. CLAIMS: MfJTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No. 027 420 through 053Z03. Seconded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 25. LIC�I�LSF�S • MOTION by Councilman Barnette to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 26 . F.STIMATES : MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted. Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman & Doty, Ltd. 43 44 IAS Center Minneapolis, N�T 55402 For professional services rendered for the month of January, 1984 $ 43.35 ��.1►. _ ��_ �+ ��. • �I�? C. _� � ' � ' (ESTIMATF� Q�NTIN[JID) E. A. Hickok & Associates 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, NII�I 55391 Moore Lake Restoration Project II Professional Services for February, 1984 .� $1,661.74 Seconded kyy Councilman Hamernik. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the �qotion carried unanimously. fi � �.1: �� MOTION by Councilman Barnette to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of February 27, 1984 adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Secretary to the City Council ; .,. . - . � William J. Nee Mayor �a�f�� mti�� crr� aF �xmr� �� r�o►ri� aF eF�� aN s-m�,T �n+�1r �7� sr. 19�t-� t�t �l) i�S, the City Camcil of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota has deemed it expedient to receive eviclence pertaining to the improvements hereinafter described. 11'3�1, �0tI3�tE, I�17I'i� IS �2�'BY GIVffi�] �T on the 12th day of March 1984 at 7:30 o'clock P.M., the City Council will meet at the City Hall in said City and will at said time and place hear all parties interested in said imprwenents in whole or in part. �fie general nature of the im�rovements is the oonstruction (in the lands and streets noted below) of the following ir�xwements, t�wit: �TliDC,FION IR�i Street improvenents, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer system, water and sanitary sewer servioes and other facilities located as follows: ST. 1984-1 (A�CH�t�U+1 �1) Univ. Ave. W. Servioe Dr. 81st Avenue to North �fD UO�ST 1984-1 (Ai�CH�D�t �1) . .. ... .... .. ... ....... . ... . 5116.566 '�AT � ARFA P�06ID 10 BE � POR SAID IS AS P+G[.il�i5: For construction iten above A11 of the land abutting upon said streets nar�ed above and all lands within, adjacent and abutting thereto. All of said land to be assessed praportionately according to the benefits reoeived by such improvemer►t. �at should the Council proceed with said improvements, they will consider each separate improvement, except as hereafter otherwise provided by the Council all �mder the follvwing authority, to--wit: Minnesota Statutes 1961, Q�apter 429 and laws amendatory thereof, and in conformity with the City Charter. D�T� �iLS L�PIY CF � 1984, BY Q�R Q' � CI'I'Y �I�II.. (Feb. 29 & March 7, 1984)-FRID �7/�a WILLIAM J. P�E Mayor 1 t►+• c►s v o� — FA1 L Y DATE �ROM �us,�ECT OIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WOAKS february 29, 1984 ,W Mark Burch, Assistant Public s pi r. TO Meeting with Roger 3ones regarding University Avenue West Service Drive (81st to 83rd Ave.) Construction lA MEMORANL�UM 0 No. 34-84 1 discussed the street improvement with Roger explaining the proposed street alignment and describing the sewer and water availability to this area. Roger agreed that construction of this service drive is probably in his best interest as well as the City's and that he would like to cooperate as much as possible with the planned improvement. His concerns are that he be able to continue to operate the golf driving range until he develops the property and that the assessments for the improvements aren't unreasonable since he is the only property owner and will have to pay the entire cost. ACTION� INFO• We discussed ways of keeping the golf driving range open by making a temporary pedestrian crossing in front of the building and Roger agreed this would be an acceptable solution. After discussing the sanitary sewer and water availability to this property we decided that utility improvements should wait and be put in when the property is developed. I informed Roger that the Council was going to hold a public hearing on this improvement on March 12th and that he could discuss the assessments with the Council at that meeting. He said he would be present. JGF/j2 � � Q � � �1.� -V � � OC W C1� � �t' � � _ � ., � i 1B I �. � � � 81 ST AvEn�uE i �� 0 � � n� F. / � . . l � � > Q } �- _ v � 4 � z � CQ!lISSION TER!!S THA? YILL SZPIRE APBIL 1, 1980 FOx CITY COIIIiCIL INFOR!lATION 2 TS8!! APPOINTSE PRESENT !�l�BRS � ePPOINTSB T'EAM EYPIRES PLAIipI�iG CQMISSIOH ( Chapter 6)( 6 Members - 3?ear Ter�) General Chairperson Chairperson Community Development Chairperson Parks � Recreation Chairperson Appeals Commission Yirginia Schnabel 1527 Windemere Circle N.E. (x. 57�-3318) LeRoy Oquist 1011 Hackman Circle N.E. (H. 571-0415)tB. 482-4363) David Kondrick 280 Stoneybrook Way N.E. (H. 571-2359)(B. 571-4767) Patricia Gabel 5947 2 1/2 Street N.E. (H. 571-1228)(B. 571-4600) Chairperson Richard Svanda Env. Quality 1521 Woodside Court N.E. Commission (H. 571-6154)(B. 297-2732) Chairperson Dean Saba Energy 6325 Van Buren N.E. Commission (H. 571-1953)(B• 635-5860) Chairperson Brian Goodspeed Human 731 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Resources (H. 571-4822) �-1-85 �-1-84 4-1-85 u-1-85 4-1-85 4-1-86 4-1-84 COMQlDNI1'Y DEVELOPMENT COl4lISSI01� ( Chapter 6)( 5 Members - 3 Tear Ter�) Chairperson LeRoy Oquist q_�_gy LeP.oy Oquist 1011 Hackman Circle N.E. ,eappo�nte (H. 571-0415)(B. u82-4383) Vice- Alfred Gabel Chairperson 59�7 2 1/2 Street N.E. (H. 571-1288)(B. 561-8800) Dr. Kenneth Vos 990 6$th Avenue N.E. (H. 571-2246) 4-1-84 �-1-85 Louis Schmidt 4-1-86 7300 East River Road (H. 571-1557)(B. 571-9201 x 26�7) Carol Fassett �-1-86 1001 Lynde Drive N.E. (H. 57�-5476) -1- Alfred Gahel eap�o�nte 4-1-87 4-1-8? �, PRESBNT MF�IDERS EZPIRES ePPOIN?BE PARRS AI�D RECRF.dTIOA COlQlISSIOp ( Chapter 6)( 5 Members - 3 Tear Ter�) Chairperson David Kondrick 4-1-85 280 Stoneybrook Way N.E. (H. 571-2359)(B. 571-4767) . Vice- Mary Schreiner �1-1-85 Chairperson 6851 Oakley Street N.E. (H. 571-3045)(B. 571-1010) Jan Seeger 4-1-8� 324 Ironton Street N.E. (H. 784-7u41) Dick Young �I-1-86 5695 Quincy Street N.E. (H. 571-8098) Daniel Allen �-1-86 6200 Rice Creek Drive N.E. (H. 571-3137)(B. 373-0956) APPEALS COH!lISSION (Cbapter 6)(5 Members - 3 Year Ter�) Chairperson Patricia Gabel �-1-85 59�7 2 1/2 Street N.E. (H. 571-1288)(B. 571-�600) Vice- Alex P. Barna 4-1-85 Chaiperson 560 Hugo Street N.E. (H. 784-5468? Jean Gerou 4-1-84 1650 Briardale Road N.E. (H. 571-6736) Donald R. Betzold 4-1-84 1601 North Innsbruck Drive �276 (H. 571-0098)(B. 533-1555) James Plemel �I-1-86 686�1 Channel Road N.E. (H. 571-0026)(B. 421-�760 x 1126) -2- Jean Gerou eappointe Donald Eetzold eappo�n e 2a APPOINTEE ?ER!! BZPIRES �-1-87 4-1-87 4-1-87 �� PRESEN? !�l�ERS BZPIRES �P� E�IIROI�RTAL QDALITY CO!!lISSI011 ( Chapter 6)( 5 Meabers - 3?ear ?er�) Chairperson Rfchard Svanda 4-1-85 1521 Woodside Court N.E. (H. 571-6154)(B. 296-7333) Vice- Maynard Nielson 4-1-85 Chairperson 7144 Riverview Terrace N.E. (H. 571-6608)(B. 571-0761) Wayne Wellan y_�_g� �layne b:ellan 6T93 Overton Drive N.E. eappointe (H. 571-4141)(B. 571-1000) Thomas Gronlund u-1-86 7411 Lyric Lane, N.E. (H. 786-7u59)(B. 370-u141) Bruce Peterson 4-1-86 7503 Tempo Terrace N.E. (H. 786-9898)(B. 853-5041) ENERGY COM�ISSIOI� (Chapter 6)(5 Members - 3 Tear Ters) Chairperson Dean Saba 4-1-86 6325 Van Buren Street N.E. (H. 571-1953)(B. 635-5860) VACAI�T 4-1-8� Bradley Sielaff 6770 Plaza Curve, N.E. (H. 574-0470)(B. 296-7753) Dale Thompson �976 3rd. Street N.E. (H. 572-8684)(B. 296-7754) Bruce Bondow 6616 Central Avenue N.E. (H. 571-0163)(B• 378-8044) -3- 4-1-85 u-1-85 4-1-86 2s APPOINTEE �AM SYPIRfiS 4-1-87 4-1-87 TBRM PRESENT !Q+l�BRS �PI$$$ ePPOIIiTBB HONAN RFSOQRCES COFliISSIWi ( Chapter 6)( 5 y�ber8 - 3 Tear Ter�) Chairperson Brian Goodspeed 4_�-gq Brian Goodspeed 731 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. Reappointe (H. 571-4822) Vice- Robert Minton 4-1-86 Chairperson 1538 North Oberlin Circle N.E. (H. 574-1173)(B. 291-8358) Peter Treuenfels 5248 Horizon Drive N.E. (H. 572-8229)(B. 536-5415) Mary Van Dan b3�2 Baker Avenue N.E. (H. 571-3177)(B• 546-3105) Barbara Kocher 7650 Jackson Street N.E. (H. 786-09��) 4-1-85 4-1-84 �-1-86 CABLE TELEVISION COI�IISSI01� (Code Section 405.28)(5 yembers - 3 7ear Ter�) Chairperson Vice- Chairperson Barbara Hughes 5�8 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. (H. 571-6182)(B. 224-4901) Duane Peterson 6312 Pierce St. N.E. ( x. 57 i-96 u4 )($. 37�+-t � 20 ) Burt Weaver 928 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. (H. 571-4237)(B. 571-1249) Edward Kaspszak 1317 Hillcrest Drive N.E (H. 571-04�11)(B. 54�-2115) Harold Belgum 191 Hartman Circle N.E. (H. 571-1191) -4- �-1-85 4-1-86 4-1-84 4-1-85 Purt 4!eaver eappoin e 4-1-84 Ralph Stouffer �65 N'c Y,i n ey St . N 571-1735 Zc APPOIATEE TERM BZPIRES a-�-e�r 4-1-87 4-1-87 4-1-87 2D TBRM APPOINTEE PRESENT l��ERS � APPOINTBE TSRM fiZPIRES FRIDLET HOOSI'AG AND REDEV'SLOPMEI�T AOTBORIIR ( 5!lesbers - 5 Tear' ?erai Chairperson Larry Commers 6-9-8u Larry Commers �_�_89 5212 St. Moritz Drive N.E. Reappointed (H. 571-8925)(B. 339-3355) Vice- Elmars A. Prieditis 6-9-86 Chairperson 6031 Benjamin Street N.E. (H. 571-7230)(B• 332-1401) Walter Rasmussen 7806 Alden Way N.E. (H. 571-6232)(B. 379-88�1) Duane Prairie 489 Rice Creek Terrace N.E. (H. 571-3993)iB. 786-9800) Carolyn Svendsen 6171 Kerry Lane N.E. (H. 571-6060)(B. 571-23�5) 6-9-87 6-9-88 6-9-85 POLICE C�9iISSION (Cbapter 102) (3 Meabers - 3 iear Ter�) Chairperson Vice- Chairperson 2/1/21/13 John. K. Hinsverk 170 Hartman Circle N.E. (H. 571-6038)(B. �25-45u1) Mavis Hauge 645 67th Avenue N.E. ( H. 571-1083) Elizabeth Kahnk 209 Rice Creek Blvd. N.E. (H. 571-2108) -5- 4-1-85 4-1-86 p_�_gp Tim Breider ,�5�i0 7pTp TarrarP NE �H) 786-5341 4-i-8? . •�. ,,� . . AN ORDINAN(E RDCbDIFYII� �iE FRID�.�.'Y CITY C�[)E BY ADOPTII� A I�7n1 Q�APTIIt 109 II�I�ID "AIlt QUALITY" ANID REPF�ALII�; OLD CHAPt'ER 109 FNPI�m "AIIt QUALITY ArID SCi,ID WASTE" IN ITS F3JPIRE.TY The City Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follaws: 109.01. AIIt QUALITY STArID�,RD6 Air Pollution Control Regulations and Ambient Air Quality Standards of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as adopted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1967� Section 116.07, as filed with the Ca�anissioner of Ac�ninistration of the State of Minnesota on July 7, 1969, are herei� adopted by reference and shall be in full force and effect in the City of Fridley as if set out here in full, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.62. (Ref. 458) 109.02. Pfl�LTIES Ar�y violation of this Chapter is a misc�►eanor and shall be subj ect to all penalties pravided for such violations under the provisions of Qzapter 901 of the Fridley City Coc7e. Each day that a violation oontinues to exist shall constitute a separate violation. Such penalties may be imposed in addition to revocation or suspension of germit and in addition to abatenent af a nuisance. PASSID AND ADOPTID BY Z%iE CITY �iNCIL OF �4iE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1984 AZ�'F�'r: SID[�Y C. Il�911N - CITY Q�ERK First Reading: Second Reading: Publish: 2/sll2l9 February 27, 1984 WII�LIAAS J. NEE - riAYOR .,. � . V• i� � • �. .�.►: � 3 r,; � ��; �.� • AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 218, ENTITLED "HAZARDOIJS WASTE �NIRCG", OF ZiiE FRID�'Y CITY �DE THE CITY QOiUNCIL OF Z�iE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOFS ORI�.IlV AS FOLI�Q�]S: ?18.01. STAZ�Tr OF P�ICY �e City of Fridley deens it necessary to provide for the special and express regulation of hazardous waste storage and treatment facilities which exist as the princip�l use in order to protect the public health, safety ana general welfare. 218.02. DEFINITIONS When used in this Chapter, the following terms have the f ollowing meanings: 1. Accessory Use. A subordinate use which is located on the same lot as the principal use and is nessary or incidental for the conduct of the principal use. 2. Disposal. The discharge, deposit, injection, dumping, spilling, leaking, or placing of any waste into or on any land or water so that the waste or an�� constitutent thereof may enter the envirorunent or be emitted into the air, or discharged into any waters, including ground waters. 3. F�virorunental Assessnent Worksheet or EA�J. A brief doc�ent desicy�ed to set out the basic facts necessary to uetermine whether ar: EIS is required for a proposed project or to initiate the scoping process for an EIS. 4. F�vironmental Impact Statenent. A detailed written statement as required by i4innesota Statutes Section 116D.04. 5. Hazardous �•7aste. Any refuse or discarded material or combinations of ref use or discarded materials in solid, semi-solid, liquid, or gaseous f orra which cannot be handled by routine waste management techniques because they pose a suhstantial present or p�tential hazard to h�man health or other living organisms because of their chemical, biological, or physical properties. Categories of hazardous waste materiats include, but are not limited to: explosives, flammables, oxidizers, p�isons, irritants, and corrosives. Hazarc7ous waste does not include sewage sludge and source, special nuclear, or by-product material as def ined by the Atcxnic Energy Act of 1954, as ar,iended. STAZ'II�TP OF POLICY DEFINITIONS �� 4A 6. Hazardous Waste Facility. Real or personal property that is used or is oonstructed to be used for the management of hazardous waste. 7. Hazardous Waste Generation. Zi1e act or prooess of producing hazarcious waste. 8. Hazardous Waste Managenent. The systematic control of the collection, source separation, storage, transportation, processing, treatment, and disposal of hazardous waste. . 9. Hazardous Waste Processing Facility. A hazardous waste facilty that is designed and operated to modify the chemical composition or chemical, physical or biological properties of a hazardous material by means such as incineration, reclamation, distillation, precipitation or other similar processes. 10. Ffanifest. The form used for identifying the quantity, oomposition, and origin, routing, and destination of hazardous waste during its transportation from the point of generation to the point of treatment, storage or disposal. 11. Principal Use. The purpose for which land or building or construction is or is to be used or occupied. 12. Sludge. Any solid, semi-solid or liquid waste generated from a municipal, comrt�ercial, or industrial waste water treatsnent plant, water supply treatrnent plant, or air pollution control facility or any other such waste having similar characteristics and effects. 13. Solid Waste. Garbage, refuse, sludge from a water supply treatment plant or air contaminant treat�ent facility, and other discarc3ed waste materials and cor,unercial, mining, and agricultural operations, and fron cor,ununity activities, but does not include hazardous waste; animal waste used as fertilizer; earthen f ill, boulders, rock; sewage sluage; solid or dissolved material in domestic sewage or other catatbn pollutants in water resources, such as silt, dissolved or suspended solids in industrial waste water effluents or discharges which are point sources subject to permits tmder section 402 of the federal water pollution oontrol act, as amended, dissolved materials in irrigation return flows; or source, special nuclear, or by-product material as defined by The Atanic Energy Act of 1954, as m►iencled. 14. Storage. �e contair�¢nent within a buildi.ng of hazardous waste, either on a tanp�rary basis or for a geriod of years, in such a manner as not to constitute disposal of such hazardous waste. 15. Trea�ent. Any method, technique or process, ancluding neutralization, desicpzed to change the physical, chemical, or biological character or oamposition of ar�y hazardous waste so as to neutralize such waste or so as to render such waste non-hazardous, safer for transport, amenable for recovery, amenable for storage, or reduced in volume. Such term includes any activity or processing desic�ed to change the physical form or chesnical oamposition of hazardous waste so as to render it norrhazardous. 218.03. SPECIAL USE PERMIT RDQ(1II2�� At�ID ZONIl�G 1. Hazardous waste storage anc] treatment facilities which are principal uses may be permittec3 only in Heavy Industrial (A'r2) Zones after a special use permit has been obtained subject to all applicable provisions of this Chapter. 2. Hazardous waste storage and treatment facilities which are accessory uses to the pricipal use or operation may be permitted only after a special use permit has been obtained. 218.04. SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPRO�TAL CT2ITERIA A Special Use Permit shall be approved only if consistent with all of the follawing objectives: 1. That the proposed hazardous waste facility is developed and operated in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations; 2. �at the hazardous waste facility is developed and operated in such a nu�ner so as to eliminate the possibility of ground water pollution in order to maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's waters, in orc3er to achieve and r,iaintain a level of water quality which provides for the protection and propsgation of f ish, shell-f ish, and wildlife and for recreation in and on the water; 3. �at the proposed hazardous waste facility be developed and operated in sucli a manner so as to eliminate air pollution. 4. Ziiat sufficient safeguards against spills, fires, and explosions are establisheci to protect the public health, safety and welfare to the greatest extent possible; 5. That the proposed site for hazardous waste facilities be developed in such a way so as to provide for opaque .screening anG landscaping to minimize the negative visual impacts from such a facility on any adjacent property; 6. 9hat the proposal is consistent with all applicable City of Fridley oodes and regulations. 7. That the proposal be consistent with the City of Fridley Canprehensive Plan; and 8. If the Fire Department determines a need f or specialized equipment, extinguishing agents or training it shall be the SPECIAL USE PERMIT RDQU IRfl�Tr AND ZOl�TII� SP'DCIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL CRIZ'II2IA 4B responsibility of the facility aaner or ogerator to provide same. 9. In addition to the above, ar�y new principal use hazardous waste facility will not be located any closer than one thousand (1000) feet of ariy H[1D flood plain, shoreland, wetland, boc3y of water, or gro�d water recharge area oz aquifer, in order to protect potential drinking water sources; 218.05. SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION P�tTRES 1. Prior to the submittal of a special use permit application, the develapers or awners of the propaseo facility shall meet with the City to review all applicable ordinances, regulations, and f uture plans for the area adjacent to the property being developed. 2. The application for the special use permit will be scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Corrunission upon completion of the F�viror�mental Quality Camnission review. 3. �e developers or awners of the proposed facilit� shall prepare prel uninary drawings in accordance with the regulations of Section 218.07 and an envirorimental assessnent worksheet and sul�nit the same to the City, 60 days prior to the public hearing. 4. The Notice for Public Hearing shall be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days, but not more than twenty (20) days, prior to the public hearing, at which time the item will be heard. Notices will also be sent during this time period to property aaners within fifteen hundred (1500) feet of the subject property. 5. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the proposed special use permit. During this public hearing, the requiranents for pregaring an Envirorunental Impact Statement will be investigated. Following the public hearing, the Planning Catunission shall, within ninety (90) days, submit its recommendation to the City Council as to the appropriateness of the proposed development, and shall recatunend if an E�virorIInental Impact Statanent is rec3uired and conditions of approval or disapproval, based upon the criteria set forth in Sections 218.03, 218.04 and 218.06 of this Chapter. 6. ZY�e application for the special use permit shall be scheduled for a City Council meeting. 7. �he City Council� shall consider the application pursuant to Sections 218.04 and 218.06 and shall approve, disapprove, postpone, or modify the�proposal. 8. If it is determined that an Environmental Impact Statement is required, the applicant must prepare this report.bef ore the City Council will take final action on the special use permit application. 9. Should the City Council approve of the application for a special use permit and preliminary plans, the applicant shall f ile f�nal plans with the City. �e final plans shall be processed in the same manner as the special use permit and preliminary plans. A certif ied copy of the special use permit shall be recorded in the Off ice of the Anoka County Recorder or Registrar of Titles, pursuant to rlinnesota Statutes, Section 462.3595, Subd. 4. SPECIAL USE PIIiN1IT APPLICATION PkOCID[JRES 4C 10. 5hould the City Council disapprwe the application for a special use permit and preliminary plans, the owners or developers may prepare another preliminary plan and resubmit to the City. 218.06. � FII�IDINGS As a prerequisite to the approval of the application for the special use permit, the City Council shall find that evidence presentecl established: l. That safe and adequate access to the facility for general, service, and emergency purposes will be provided from norrresidential major thoroughfares, and will not require the use of any residential collector or residential local streets; 2. That the operation of the facility will not proc3uce fumes, odors, noise, dust, smoke or gases which will adversely affect nearby properties; 3. That the issues raised in the EAW or EIS have been satisfactorarily and adequately answered and addressed. 4. �at the types of soil under and within one quarter mile of all portions of the praposed site to be used for.storage, treatment, loading and handling of hazardous materials, as well as under all g3ved surface or roads leading to the €acilities, shall not have a natural percolation rate in excess of 0.75 gallons per day per square foot; 5. That all surface water, ground water, sanitary sewer systems, and storm water syste�►s will be protectec3 so as to eliminate the probability of contan-�ination by hazardous waste; and 6. That necessary fire fighting equipment and materials are available or will be provided by the vwner/operator. 7. �hat the use of the proposed site for hazardous waste treatment will not endanger the public health or safety, or substantially reduce the value of adjoining or nearby property. 218.07. PRII�IMINARY PLAt3S RDQtIIItID 1. Maps of the area within ot�e half mile of the exterior property lines of the proposed site, and including the proposed site, which shaw: A. All dwelling units, other pri.ncipal buildings and structures and streets; B. All sic�ificant topographical features; C. All surface water systens; D. All sanitary sewer systens; E. All storm water management systens; and F. All wells. 2. An engineering certif ication for the proposed site and the area within one half mile of the proposed site ooncerning the following a i�• . �� pRII,IMINF1�tY PIAIVS 4D 4E factors: A. Dep�h to seasonally high water tables B. Soil drainage, aamposition, thicla�►ess in permeability; C. Flooding, ground water recharge areas, aquifers, and f lood plai.ns; D. Depth to bedrock; ana E. Prevailing wind conditions. 3. Appropriate permits from the I�linnesota Pollution Control Agency, Anoka County Health Board, Department of Natural Resources, State Envirorrmental Quality Board, State Waste Management Board, and the local watershed managgnent organization for the proposed site are required. In addition, the operator must pravide oertificates that the proposed principal use facility is in compliance with th e appropriate local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations governing: air quality standards, water quality standards, and waste water standards. 4. A narrative explaining the estimated composition, quantities, and concentrations of any hazardous waste identif ied or listed by this (�,apter, or co�binations of any such hazardous waste and any other solid waste, proposed to be stored, treated, transported, and the time, frequency, or rate of which such waste is proposed to be stored, treatec3, or transportec3. 5. Preliminary site plan - The preliminary site plan shall be drawn at a minim�rn scale of one (1) inch equals fifty (50) feet. The submission may be composed of one (1) or more sheets and drawings and shall include: A. Location of all proposed buildings anc3 their proposed uses; B. Location of driveway and parking areas; C. Front, rear and side yard setbacks; D. Square footage and dimensions of all proposed buildings; and E. Location of all easements, width and purpose. 6. �e landscape plan shall be drawn at a minim� scale of one (1) inch equals fifty (50) feet and shall contain the following inf ormation: A. Areas for berming, sodding and screening; B. Location of proposed plantings, identifying materials as shade tree, flawering tree, ooniferous tree, or shrubs; C. Location of any existing vegetation; and D. Identif ication and location of any trees to be renoved. 7. A grading and drainage plan shall be drawn at a minim�an scale of one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet and shall contain the following information: A. Existing and proposed grades with a minim�n of two (2) foot oontour intervals to a knc�m sea level dat�an; , 4F B. Spot elevations on all proposed hard surfaoe areas; C. Fstimated runoff of the area based upon one, ten and one hundred year storms; D. Location of proposed ponding areas indicating the size and depth of the pond, and amount of acre feet of water to be stored; anc3 E. Finish floor elevations ot a11 ouila�.ngs. 8. Floor plans and elevations: Al1 floor plans and elevations shall be drawn to a legible scale and include the following inforn�akion: A. Floor plans indicating square footage and dimension of all proposed rocros and areas within the structure, identifying the proposed uses for each roan; and B. Elevations of the proposed buildings, identifying exterior treatrnent such as materials to be used and the oolor. C. Interior diking and retention areas identifying the volume to be contained and method of renaval. 218.08. FINAL PLANS RDQIJIitID FINAL' PLANS 1. A final site plan shall be prepared at a scale of one (1) inch �� equals f ifty (50) feet and shall contain the follawing information: A. Location of proposed buildings; B. Location of prop�sed driveways and parking areas; C. Front, rear, and side yard setbacks; and D. Sc;uare footage of all proposed buildings. 2. Final landscape plan shall be c�rawn at a scale of one equals f ifty (50) feet and shall oontain the follawing: A. Plant types (botanical and co�non names) , n�anber, size, and method of installation; B. Areas to be sodded; (1) inch location, C. Location of existing vegetation; D. Identif ication and location of trees to be r enoved. 3. Final grading and drainage plan shall be drawn at a scale of one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet and shall contain the follawing information: A. Existing and proposed grades with a minim� of two (2) foot oontour intervals to a knawn sea level dat�an; 8. S�fficient spot elevations on all proposed hard surface 8IEdSi C. Fstimated runoff of the area based upon a one, ten and one hundred year storms; D. Location of proposed ponding areas indicating the size and dep�th of the pond, and amount of acre feet of water to be stored; E. Finish floor elevations of all buildings;and F. Identify soils by type anc7 location, including identif ication of the water table, and suitability of soil for the proposed develognent. 4. Final floor plans, construction clrawings and elevations shall be drawn to a legible scale and shall include the following inf ormation : A. Plans indicating square footage, dimension, and uses of all proposed areas within the building; and B. Elevations of the proposeci building, identifying exterior treatrnent, such as materials to be used and the oolor. C. Interior diking and retention areas identifying the volur,�e to be contained and method of ranoval. 218. 0 9. C�IANGES IId PLANS 1. If the applicant proposes major changes in the f inal site plan that are inconsistent with the preliminary site plan, these changes can only be made by resubr�ission of a new preliminary site plan ana new special use permit application to the City and rescheduling of this item before the Enviroranental Quality Carunission, a new public hearing before the Planning Caruaission, anc7 reviewal again by the City Council. �e follawing constitute major changes: A. Increase in the size of the proposed structure or develognent; B. Change in architectural design or style; C. Increase in the height of the building; D. A major modification to the landscape plan; E. A si�ificant reduction in proposed open space and buf fering; F. A change in the develognent schedule; G. Change in road location or stanclards; ana H. Other changes as determined to be major by the City Council. 2. Nlinor Changes. �e City Council may, in its discretion, permit minor deviations f rom the preliminary site plan. which do not change the concept or intent of the proposed development as previously approved. � 218.10. T� LIl�+II'PATIOi�1S If final plan approval is not granted within a six (6) month period from the time of the approval of the special use permit application and preliminary plans, the proposal shall be declarec3 null and void and the applicant will have to re-file a preliminary plan and special use permit application with the City. Q�ANGES IN PT�ANS TIME LIMITATIONS 4G 218.11. ST.PSIDARD6 1. For principral use facilities, the property must be zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial District. 2. Minim�an setbacks from property line, major roads, and other buildings, shall be two hundred (200) feet. Minimum setbacks f ram ariy residential structure shall be four hundred (400) feet. 3. Minimtan lot size shall be 10 acres; maximi�n lot coverage shall be 258; maximum area for parking shall be 258; maximtun building heic,�t shall be 40 feet; building materials shall be concrete or brick; and no metal buildings shall be allawed. 4. Minimiar► landscape area shall be 50$ . 5. �e entire site shall be opaquely screened so that the building or parking or storage areas cannot be seen from a public street. 6. rlinim� tree sizes: shade trees shall be 3 1/2 inch caliber; snall trees shall be 3 inch caliber; flowering trees shall be 3 inch caliber; shrubs shall be 3 feet in height; and coniferous trees shall be 12 to 15 feet in height. 7. No migration of water overland shall be permitted beyond the property lines. All ponding of water shall be contained on the site and provisions made to contain all water runoff so as not to discharge into the municipal sanitary sewer system or any storm a�ater systsn or ditch. 8. Concrete curb and gutter shall be required along all parking areas. All parking areas shall be concrete surfaoes. 9. No outdoor storage shall be permitted. 218.12. RDCnRD I�EPII�]G Zl�e operators of the hazardous waste facility shall maintain records of all hazardous waste identified or listed which is treated, transported, or stored, and the manner in which such waste are to be treated, stored, or transported. The operators of the facility shall subr�it a quarterly report to the City Council, identifying the treatment, storage, or transport of all such waste received by the facility. 218.13. IlJSPECTION 1. For the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Chapter, any person who generates. stores, treats, transports or otherwise handles or has handled hazardous waste, shall furnish inf ormation relating to such waste upon request of the follvwing persons: City Building Inspector; Public Works Director; Police Chief; City Manager; or the Fire Chief. Such persons at all reasonable times shall have acoess to and the right to copy all records relating to such waste. 2. Any duly authorized City personnel shall be allowed at any reasonable time to enter any establishment or other place where �+v:.� :��:� •��•� �+• � INSPEC.TION 4H hazardous wastes are or have been stored, treated, or transported f rom. 3. Any duly authorized City personnel shall be allowed to inspect and obtain samples fram any person of ariy such waste and samples of any containers or labeling for such containers. 4. Any duly authorized City personnel can at any time, without prior oonsent, inspect the site for the possibility of any leakage, spills, or violations of any local, state, or federal law, rules or regulations. 5. Any records, reports, or information obtained by the City shall be made available to the public. 6. ZYie existence of ar�y violation of local, state or federal laws, rules or regulations shall require the closing of said facility �til it has been determined by public hearing the reasons f or said violatins and the identification and implementation of additional safeguards to prevent future violations. 218.14. RDQU�S OF �'II�LIANCE ORDIIiS Any order issued pursuant to this Chapter may include a suspension or revocation of the special use permit issued under this Chapter and shall state with reasonable specificity the nature of the violation and specify a time for c.anpliance. Any violation of this C�apter shall be considered a misdemeanor. 218.15. MONIZC7RING ANALYSIS AI�ID Z'F�SrIl�1G 1. If City determines that the presence of any unauthorized hazardous wastes are being stored, treated, transportec3 or disposed of, the City may demand that the facility be closed within f our (4) hours upon written notice. 2. If the City determines that the release of any materials from a hazardous waste facility or site may present a substantial hazard to human health or the environment, the City may issue an order requiring the owner or operator of the facility to conduct such monitoring, testing, analysis anc3 reporting with respect to such facility or site as the City deems reasonable to ascertain the nature and extent of such hazard, including spills, leaks, explosions, and f ire. 3. If the City determines that the awner or operator, is unable to conduct monitoring, testing, and analysis, or reporting satisfactory to the City, and if the City deens any such action carried out by the awner or operator to be unsatisfactory, or if the City cannot initially determine that there is an owner or operator who is able to conduct such monitoring, testing, or reporting, the City may: A. Conduct monitoring, testing, os reasonable to ascertain the naturE associated with the site concerned; analysis, which it deems and extent of the hazard or B. Authorize the state or a local authority or testing facility to carry out ar►y such action; and �• i• • « ••��• �I,YSIS At�ID Z'ESTIl�G 4I C. Require the owner or operator to pay for the cost of monitoring, testing, or analysis done by outside agencies plus associated fees of 10$ for City expenses. 218.16. NOTI(� OF SPII�S, LF�AKS, F�.'IA6IONS, FIIZE OR ACCIDENl'S In the event of any spill, leak, explosion, fire, or accident, the aaner or operator of the facility is required, within a one (1) hour time period, to notify the following individuals: Fire Chief, Polfce Chief, Anoka County Health Department, and Minnesota Pbllution Control Agency. Failure to report such incidents within the one (1) hour period shall constitute a misd��eanor. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1984. WILLIAM J. NEE — MAYOR :_ �i�� SIDt1EY C. II�II�'1F�t� — CITY CLf�2K First Reading: October 17, 1983 Second Reading: Publish: 2/8/3/21 �� J SPII�.S, I�EAK.S E?�'L�OSIONS, FIRE OR ACCIDEDflr n+• c�TV os FA1 L Y DATE ______ fROM SUBJECT OIAECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS Park Construction Crushing Special Use Permit 5 MEMOAANDUM No. 25A-84 TO m Oureshi, Citv Mana9er ACTION� INFO• At the December 20, 1982 City Council Meeting, The council approved Special Use Permit #82-12 granting the use of a rock crusher on the Park Construction site for crushing used concrete. They have not initiated any crushing to date due to the lack of adequate quantities of material. As the Special Use Permit was granted for one year with a re-evaluation of its use scheduled for March 1984, they have requested a one year extension in order to complete a crushing operation. Based upon the Councils desire, I have contacted Park Constructirn, Mr. Olson, and requested he attend the March 12 City Counr.il meeting to explain his request. JGF/jz .� i'��.��Y ' ?.�..� .s �i �. T= `�!� ' .. 3y - �rr ..'`~ �.�-3`� . �. �_ ti„�. ... �� • Y - � CITY OF FRI�LEY a�31 UNIVEpSIT1f AVENUE N.E., FRIOLEY, MINNESOTA SS13Z Carl Olson Park Construction Company 7900 Beech Street N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 TELEPMONE (6121571-3150 January 14, 1983 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE (AMENDED) 5A On December 20, 1982 , the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for pecia se Permit, SP �82-12, to allow a.crusher to reclaim W��h� the stipulations listed below: concre e , 1. Special Use Permit, SP #82-12, grnted only for the period from March 1, 1983 to February 28, 1984, and re-evaluate the permit at the first reqular meetino of the Council in March, 1984, providing there has been one crushing operation at that time. 2. The City be allowed to dump their waste concrete material at this site in City trucks, at no cost, credit allowance to be agreed upon, will be provided to the City for the amount of waste concrete deposited. 3. �Park Construction take the necessary steps to ensure the City and State noise, dust and environmental limits are not exceeded. 4. The rock crusher, generators and stock piles to located as far north and east on the property as possible. 5. The same standards regarding run-aff be appliced to this site, as applied in the Rice Creek Watershed area. If you have any questions regarding the above action, glease call the Cortmunity Develop�ent Office at 571-3450. JLB/de �ncerely, ," � � ��, ;� . ; �/% , ,, 'r: . �.� l/ ; ; " - � f ;�,._._�--- RROLD L. BOARDMAN City Planner Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below, and return one copy to the City of Fridley. � l Conc wit acti taken. • OOCX� � , � CONSTRUCTION C0. �COMMERCIAL AND � � �� INOUSTq1AL EXCA' �t�,� � AOAD BU�LOING ■PILE ORIVING "� •SEWER, WATER i ti�� INSTAI,LATION ..!� I�lt��.. • BRICGES ESTABl15ME0 •GOIF COURSES '�t6 ■SUB DIVtS10N AND LAND DEVELOPMENT •EGUIPMENT RENTAL •ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 7900 BEECM STREET N.E. • MINNEAPQLIS, MINNESOTA 5543? • TELEPNONE 7869800 February 14, 1984 Fridiey City Council City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N. E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Re: Special Use Permit S. P. #82-12 Gentlemen: The above referenced permit will expire on February 28, 1984 and Park Construction Company has not done any crushing due to the fact that the concrete was slow in coming in. We therefore ask that the City Council extend this permit for another year. Should there be any questions please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY /� �. C 1G A. Olson, afety Director se - AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER - ••�� • M • l', AN ORDINANCE RF.XbDIFYII� �iE FRIIH,EY CITY �E BY ANff.TIDIl� Q�AP'I�R 205 II�ITLID "ZONING", SECTIONS 205.04.4, 205.04.6, 205.05.4, 205.07.3, 205.07.4, 205.08.6, 205.12.2, 205.13.1, 205.14.1, 205.15.1, 205.16.1, 205.18.1, 205.18.2, 205.25.6 AND BY ADDING SDCTION 205.04.8 'IDE CITY QOiINCIL OF ZfiE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES ORDiAIN AS FOLI�TS: 205.04.4. BUII�DING SITE I. No land shall be altered and no use shall be permitted that results in water run-off causing flooding, erosion or deposits of minerals on adjacent properties. Stormwater r�n-off from a dev �� s�te c�>>> >eave at no greater rate or lesser �ty than the stormwater r�n-off fram the si te i n�n Lndevel o�d condi t? on. //Any// Stormwater run-off shall not exceed the rate of ri�n-off of � undeveloped land for a 24 hour storm with a� year ret�rn f,�ecn�Pncy Detention facilities shall be designPd fnr a 24 hour Gt-orm wi th a 100 year ret�rn f req ��encv. All run-of f shal l be properly channeled into a stonn drain water course, ponc9ing area or other public facility designed for that purpose. Any change in grade affecting water run-off onto an adjacent property must be apprwed by the City. 205.04.6. RDQUIitID YARD AI�ID OPEN SPACE A. �e follawing shall not be considered an encroachment on yard and setback requiranents: (3) p�k,�, unenclosed porches, canopies and steps to building entrances may extend not more than ten (10) feet into any required f ront or rear yard setback and not more than three f 3) feet ? nto an� ��red side yard, provided they do not extend nearer than f ive (5) feet to any lot line. � � � : a:,�/Y��iY �;► : ?� : y�i�►14. �• �. - -y �u �- •: :,•i �� - . . �. �- - �_ - - � ;,. •� :,. • - -. .�. .� � �- �• - •• - - -. 1 111 . -- .�. �- •• • u • -• �• • �• - --• 1 111 � - -- � �- • •, �• •� �• • .�. 1 - -�- �" -�- �� • � '�' � ' � •� 1� N •-. ♦ �• �_.�- - •�11; � -1• y)� � � , ' - ' 11 � - • ' - • ' • � - ' • • � • �' ' �. - - �. �! �1 �.� � ' :.� .�• J� � �- .•• -•. - �_� - - -�� 11 �� - -- .�• • • • �• • -• � -� � � BUILDII� SITE RDQL) IRID YARD AAID OPEN SPACE ..�• � � • a• • a i�+ v � . - � �� 205.07.3. LOT RDQU�TiS At�ID SE'�ACRS D. Setbacks. (2) Side Yard: (c) Corner Lots: ((1)) The side yard width on a street side of a corner lot shall not be less than seventeen and one-hal f (17 .5 ) feet. ((2)) When the lot to the rear Qf a corner lot has frontage along a side street, no acoessory building on �� oorner lot within twenty-five (25) feet of the common property line shall be closer to said side street than thirty (30) feet; provided however, that this regulation shall not be interpreted as to reduce the buildable width of a corner lot t.o less than twenty-f ive (25) feet. 205.07.4. BUILDING RDQ(JIR�TIS C. Basement. All one-f�n:ily dwellings constructed on vacant lots, as of January 1, 1983 shall have a basement excegt if located in a f ood_p�ain �� 205.08.6. PERFFOFtMANC� STArIDAFtD6 A. Parking Requirenents. ,(XY//��'�r��/��X�� : ,��rii��x��i��i,�zri��c�,�,��x�,��xx�i�xxn� ��v��i��zx��,��x . ,�,ri�a�i��x��x�x�i�r�zxn�ix��,�i��i��i��x��,��i �i��,�i��i��i��i��i�� r��x��x�r��/��c��'��/��i��i��f,�� 1��K/�/��t/ X�/��¢��/��/ (1) ,(!�y An existing one and one-half (1-1/2) stall garage for each dwelling unit shall satisfy the off-street parking stall requirenent. 205.12.2. USFS PERMITI� B. Accessory Uses. 6A • • �. ��, • ,�. �• • « BUII�DII�G RDQi.1IRII�JIS .�,. �. . «� � �� • • �. USES PERMITI� - . - -� . . . .�• • - _.. . -. . �- � . � .�. - . u :,� �i: • .� _�. �.- - - -• =.-n,-� � �- ... •� - .• - �n-� �.�•► 205.13.1. USFS PII2MITI'ID C. Uses P+ermitted With a Special Use Permit. (9) Exterior storage of materials �.��n}= 205.14.1. USFS P�RMIT!'ID C. Uses Pennitted With a Special Use Permit. (8) Exterior storage of materials �'i.s�i]�• 205.15.1. USFS PII2�4ITI'ID C. Uses Permitted With a Special Use Permit. (8) Exterior storage of materials �_�, �. 205.16.1. USFS PERMIZTID C. Uses Perriittec3 L•lith a Special Use Fermit. (3) Exterior storage of materials �d eaui.unent. 205.18.1. USFS PERMIZTID A. Princip�l Uses. (7) Renair G�ge. ,(81 Automobile ��Sp Station. B. Accessory Uses. l71 B�si ness s� � for �ses �r;�rm, tted. C. Uses Permitted ��Tith a Special Use Fermit. j9) Exterior storage of materials. 205.18.2. USES EXCC�IJDID E. Nuclear �� 1E�1ci� yb�� processing or storage facilities. US�S PIIZNIITl�D USFS PIIiMITIED USFS F'EFiMITi'ID USES PERNIITI'ID USFS PEF2MITI� -f �+, « . ��,�� . 205.25.6. SITE PLAN RDQUIRII�TIS s. � site plans �/��l1�1/1�X� Sh�� 1'�� be required for � �; � ��y dwe��ino 0 or the extension, enlargement, change� or alteration thereof, nor acoessory structures thereto. �i,��x�i��xz��,��x�,r 205.05.4. SPECIAL USE PERMIT G. Lapse Of A Special Use Permit By Non-Use. Whenever within one (1) year after granting a Special Use Permit, the recipient of the Special Use Permit shall not have �Xf�� the work as required by the permit, then such permit shall becane null and voin unless a petition for an extension of time in which to co�nplete the work is granted. Such extension shall be requested in writing and filed with the City at least twenty (20) days before the expiration of the original Special Use Fermit. The request for extension shall state facts shaaing a good faith attenpt to complete the work. Such petition shall be presented to the City Council for f inal action. PASSID ADID ADOPTID BY ZI-iE CITY �UNCIL OF Zi�lE CITY OF FRIDLEY TH IS L1AY OF , 19 84 . WILLIAt•� J . NEE - MAYOR ATI'F�ST : SIDNE,'Y C. II�4•]AI: - CITY Q,ERi: Public Reading: February 27, 1984 First Reading: Second Reading: Publish: 2/ 8/4/12 • a• �• a i�+ � �� USE PERMIT 6C ORDIAANCE N0. AN ORDIAANCE TO AMEND TH8 CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY� MINNESOTA BY MARING A CHAHGE IH ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SECTION 2. The tract or area Within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: Lot 1, Western Ridge Estates, lying in the South Half of Section 24, T-30, R-24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District known as R-3 (general multiple d�ellings). Lot 2, Western Ridge Estates, lying in the South Half of Section 24� T-30, R-2u, City of Fridley, County of Anoka. Is hereby designated to be in Zoned District known as R-2 (two family dwellings). SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show such tract or area knoWn as Lot 1, from R-1 (one family dWellings) and R-2 (txo family dwellings) to R-3 (general multiple dWellings), and to shou such tract or area knoxn as Lot 2, from R-1 (one family dwellings) to R-2 (two family dxellings) all in Western Ridge Estates. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 198�• ATTEST: SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CLERK First Reading: Second Reading: Publish....... 2/8/7/1 ZoA #83-04 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR 0 % . -- - � . � . v � �� . r t Z �� _ 7.Ot ttA i — — . : :--, ,N , • -tzTl�- f � � � � ; � �' ; , -. Z � n� , + � i , • ... _ � �i � , �/ � . � � '• q\ _ , � i � � , �1 � � \ �\i��\\ _ .' • � . s � ► rA N f W � II .� I � �'� C� cY' �s=. , , • � IMt�/' . •0000oQ00; , r� � , , i � .. i . i . / � � M' " ' . ,�, ` • . . i� � � , � ,. i � �� % �•: . • � • . i . , i '• , 1• % �i .' �, �`►.7 , � 0 � :. Attachment 4 � Z i .•''�� / ' 000�• ZoNE 1zN£ � 7A ••��►• • • AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF �4iE CITY CBARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLOS AND AU'II�ORI Z Il� �iE SAIrE �iII2mF R�e Co�cil of the City of' Fridley does ordain as follows: l. Zfie City of Fridley is the fee vwner of the tract of land within the City of Fridley� Anoka County, State of t�linr�esota, descri.bed as follows: Part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94, PII�] � 243024330001 All lying in Section 24, ZL30, 1�24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of rliru�esota. 2. It is hereby determined by the Council that the City no longer has any reason to continue to own said property and the Council is hereby authorized to sell or enter into a oontract to sell said property. 3. �fie Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the necessary contracts and deeds to effect the sale of the above described real estate. PASSID AI�ID ADOPrID BY �3E CITY Q�UNCIL OF Z�iE CITY OF FRIDLEY ZI�IS �Y OF , 1984. WILLIAM J. I�E - MAYOR ATI�S'I': SIDI�,'Y C. II�1N - CITY Q�ERK First Reading: Second Reading: P�lish : ?,/8/3/32 : tr,s C+T � os FR! L Y DATE Februar_� FROM �.P.W. C' CUBJECT OIRECTORATE OF PUBLtC WORKS 21. 1 Suggested Disposal or Sale of Excess Property r iZ•� 8A MEMORANOUM ACTION� INFO• Part of Lot 1, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94 has been re-conveyed to the City for Non-use purposes giving the City Fee Ownership. The property in and of itself is not developable and consequently becomes excess property. Section 12.06 of the City Charter requires that all real property be sold or disposed of by ordinance (See attached). I would suggest the City sell the above mentioned property to adjoining property owner at a cost established and approved by the City Council. CVM/jz .. .. , �` = ��,.. �,,. .v�— �'...' " n o :� � * a°.�rr�•�, � Y�, �j`' : _ � '' ---- ,-`'� - . - ,,., � -- �.. o p o o� '� �v x;w,� � . - - • ,.. � � o �b .,n � � . . ,. �n ,,,, r•�- .;....•• Q p , ., w► � "' o e )n.�`�a; r ;� �1Z � �p � %�r b b ''�n` ` N� �7 D ,l , � � t� ' e ; .f•- �i ♦ �` � r r �p� �� ;;.s � ?� v Y+ .'O 1,, e o+� I t : � �1� �s,� ,�v � � s��► . �w � : : . �� .w ,,.• I 1� , . I w•, f`�.r a a ti � i � ✓ i � !► � � r' J .�A� � � �v a h �. • a/ _ �. �'�'�� MI .� `a 4� � �� p� w�� ±�� ` b � � � � ! i � i .s i M J � b, s� . � � : � �., �! � .s . h 1A` • r �- - - �� ;_--�. i �,,.�...,. �q � ui �+ w�r• ' O t � w►t �*, " � yj �Q]., �,r.7� = Qp �b r- � �'�} � ' : �s�+ —"��jM = + O �ti? i K � � \ � �� i • g? ta - � �'� : ��' ^�4 � �. � � i� �r/�b��' M �a� . , � L% iw�+;a:+� .st Z y� �! � h ` � i � .. Q �� , '��"- �'�v1 �.wr� ._�� 3 � �� i�i � J �s �• � = Y N�� "�' ` ;�' �� ;" 'n �u� i ; s'� � a��— �— � t to p K ! t' i`'�� w�• K� � O � ' � r��r��; ; �� i �� o t O y� � i � �Qw ,,, = _ _�� o C J � � x � !': , �� w�r — � ... ' j � `�!w � a'�b j�.{,� ' y � ; � �;7� ' nt-•.. �• IiNI� pR ; � ' . ' �� . . „,.•• �.`., 1�r►'LT.. _ ��" a'r _---- �+v - -----� - �. s r r N�r•r :� . � i o�v �.,., 3a�aa :_,�.;�. . o � i � � � � :� �.wn�vl • 1 � � Q� �,f � � :A �r x ... u�a..i' . � � . � •Aai� I►M�'i� I� �� Q+ .� �� W v� �� +� � /liii' �' w' � a�' �, r �' b.� �Q'� `�� a �N„ b 1n � �� t t wA/� •�� ' �I ' M • � i; _o'�'t �1� J h � ►n a�f � „ �, �,j /� f �•N f ' »,n�/'�� MM � NI- �' ', _ �'.t J � �� V��,.1 l7f ' • .w "` r 1• � a —'� ;i' �'%� � '.der � ' I ' . �„ • yeaf � • ' LQ N�I :ir• os k , � � , � �' M`JM Op ' O i ^ M1 ' R s. .�"a�► r• wrr��,� V/ � , � �� i s ,,, � Z , � � ~ — , I �� ° �A ; �,. o ; . f� .� ;M "� }' � �� i� `�� y�'� : , : � � � � �� O Gr ' t � • a� ir � � � .�� .. M ; _ , _ • . . � '- �i � ,�} �'' • � ` � !p . , � . � •'/ 7,i^ � ~ �/ w♦ � � � � ' • • C I• � • `� '• � ! 1 , itp = : �ub � � � '. �� , �1 � t crr , , W , � f I � �, r+� i tV � � '"` � �, � = p , 7 � • _ � ' h � r i . . � � • � � r I I = !=` o � � , �y •� ;' Q : �� - � ,,� � i . '� , - i ; •r . '... �•;�' + � � p` Z` '1 1 � � , 1 � � v / ,rr � � � � I � � v � � � . � +� �_ r '� ,� _ 7 Q — : . 0 7 � . � � ` ; �i.� ( r � �"� E �� : . o ' � ` i, � S � � o C ,� .. • 1 , A : � � • ^ 2 � t ' � �� f� � � iw � ' . �'. � � � i_ � . =' �• � � MIM 1~ . ��/ �,� �I ` 1 � � fs T ' �- �•�,�' _ W �� . � � --� , w ^ O !�/'1 � �� i � �' � � e Q � z � �. y ' Z �., o � i`� �� , . J @ r' j -�° h M r+ �C '�1 ,: •.r : .�`t^� . � � t v �r. yi •- o, . � � L� � _ Z �v �y-- • � I .� - �t e ti '� � � �,�, � � ` � �� ` Q; �� ` ` � � , � — 1� p. ` ^ N '+ �' � � 1 ti f0 -a�_. ` •� g ' j� � � rl n w * .°..L " ` � ^ � �. • � .... o ,� : , 'p� ' y� � _ $ �} �� „ _ +� � R !� , �� .` 1 � v , �� / j .�1, L •� . � 's. C � �� .� u � � ' � �" , J . ,`�' �� ,_.. � y � i .' �. , � . : .': , � : :°, t � M '{ ` ' � ' � ' ��. � Y`_ — s Z � �..-�. : ;i , , . } o �o* • o� 1 O� �_ . •�.� � � � t . ` s � b� =� Nr j .;re � e � " p � � 1e1 �" . e �°� - ��a o � � ;]� � ; � ; 1 ' •. �,. � � e p � tii , � .� :_"- -- - ,,. .= e s= 3 � � - O r - _ _ - ; - ,-__�.�_ _' �'�'- -� {�i e • ~. . M 'j� � . • �� si.r•i , . . ,� ' I � (ofi�} .� ( � / . � . �� o � : �w�,. � '� • ; ' � � ' 1� � � i � i � ; � , Z, 0 QZ'Y 0� F'RI��;Y MEMORANDOM '10: I�LSIM M. ¢JRFS'HI, CITY MAN?�GER F�'I: SID II�II�IF�N, DIRDCInR OF CE�IIItAL SIINICES SUBJECT: LIQUOR ORDINANC'E UP�P►TF5 L1ATE: MARC�i 7, 1984 The attached ordinances update the various Liquor Chapters from �apter 601 to Chapter 607. The following is a brief snyopsis of those items that have been changed. You will also notice that inforniation that is added is �derlined and information that is being replaced appears between two sets of double slashes. Zl�e first change aoncerns public hearings. Public hearing provisions for initial lioenses are set out in Chapters 602, 603, 605 and 606. In light of our research regarding public hearings on renewal licenses, it showed that eight out of ten municipalities did not hold public hearings on renewal licenses. We will still review the applicatons and if anything shvws up in the review, the Council will have the option to call for a public hearing. The public hearing language has been revised in all of the above four mentioned chapters and the obsolete language has been removed. All licensees will receive written notification as to the date their license will be placed on the agenda for apraval. It is reca�unendec7 that the licenses be placed on the agenda as they have been•in past and only those with specific problens will be segregated for the Council's review. �e second change is in the area of boncis. (�apters 603, 605, 606 and 607 have been changed to reflect the new State Law which requires that S3,OOQ Bond is requirec] to ensure that if an organization holding a lioense fails to oanply with the oonditions of the City, we can use this money for all expenses incurred in the process of revoking the lioense. It should be pointed out that this bond is not a requirenent for those holders of nonintoxicating malt liquor either on or off-sale. We have also changed some of the language regarding the liability insuranoe in all Ct�apters of the City Code. Zl�ese are minor changes and merely require that the Certificate of Insurance be sent to the City Clerk and it additionally spells out the period in that the Certif icate of Insurance must oo�ver. �� LIQUOR OfftDIN�NC� UP�ATfS -2- 'TY�ere is also a change in (�apter 601, definition of i�noral character. This Resource CoRUaittee and after conferring Legal Intern, the new language is their MARQ� 7 , 1989 Section 601.07 regarding the was brought up by the Human with the City Attorney and our reccx�ut�ended change. Another change I want to bring your attention is in Chapter 603, Section 603.11, Conditions of License. Specifically, it indicates that the appli.cates must subr�it to the City Council moneys that they have given on behalf of canidates fram the year 1969 to the present date. Our research indicates that this portion was established in 1969 and we do not believe it was the intent of the City Council that we should forever include canpai� contributions. We have arbitrarily selected 365 days and request that you review this anc7 give us a recoRU-�enc7ation on what woulc3 be an appropriate time fr�ne. In (fiapter 605, Section 605.13 and Chapter 606, Section 606.11, we updated and changed the hours information which was previously approved by the Council but inadvertently left out at the time of approving the ordinance. This specificaly refers to the "Minnesota Viking Law." There are sone additional �rinor changes throughtout, which are not sig�if icant, and I will be prepared to resporxi to then if you have any have guestions. SCI:sh 4/0/4/14 ORDII�1rKE PD. __ �(�p,��, ENTITLID 'MUNICI��OPE ONE OF LIQ OR"� SDCTIOrIS 601.07 ArID 601.08 TY�e City Co�mcil of the City of Fridley cbes orc3ain as follvws: 601.07. aC1rIDITIONS ADID RF�ICl`I�1S 7. No rson //of a known imonoral character and no disorderl perspr{/f�►*ho � s a s�ndthr� t habi tLa1 ar �nkard or imorovid�n - - - - •. ... -. � .,..�.,a �f . shall be permitted on the M�aiicipal Liquor Dispensary prenises. 601.08. LIABILITY �� The Mu�icipal Liquor Dispensary shall, prior to commencement or continuation of operation after //March// �►1i9� l, 1983, demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.95 to the //CQim►issioner of Public Safety// ��tv� erk. Proof of f inancial resp�nsibility may be given by filing: 1. A certif icate that there is in ef fect fQZ t� �t' ��'n�'pred bv. �h t3 n� an insurance policy or pool providing the following minim�n coverages: A. $50,000 because of bodily inj ury to any one person in any one occurr�ce, and, subject to the limit for one person, in the amount of 5100,000 because of bodily injury to two or more persons in any one occurrence, and in the amount of 510,000 because of injury to or destruction of property of others in any ore occur r�ce. B. 550,000 for loss of ineans of support of any one person in any one occurrence, and, subject to the limit for one person, 5100,000 for loss of ineans of sup�port of two or m�re persons in any one occurrence; or 2. A bond of a surety oompany with minim�n coverages as provic3ed in Section (1) above, or 3. A certificate of the State Treasurer that the licensee has deposited with the State Treasurer $100,000 in cash or securities which may be legally purchased by savings banlcs or for trust funds having a market value of $100,000. ppSSID p�ND ADOP'I'ID SY �iE CITY C�JNCII. OF Z�iE CITY. OF FRIDLEY THIS � DAI' OF , 19 84. �� SIDI�'Y C. It�'1At: - QTY Q�EF2iC First Reading: Secon�d Reading: Publish: 2/8/4/19 WILLIAM J. I�E - MAYOR . � �[�IDITIOI�IS AI�ID �xicrzass LIABILITY INS�TRANCE .-.�.� « . AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING C�iAPTER 602, ENTITLED "BEER LICENSING" � SDC.�IOAI 602.13, DELE.TIl�1G SF�(.�IOt3 602.05 AI�ID BY ADDING A I�W SIX.TION 602.05 7l�e City Cou�cil of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: //602.05. GRANTII� OF' LICE�ISE 1. Investigation and Hearing. '�e City Co�cil, or its authorized agent, shall investigate all facts set out in the application. Opport�u�►ity shall be given to any person to be heard for or against the granting of the initial "on-sale" lioense. After such investigation and hearing, where applicable, the Council shall grant or refuse the application in its discretion. 2. Transfers. Each license shall be issued to the applicant only and shall not be transferable to another holder. Each lioense shall be issued only for the prer,ises described in the application. Nb lioense shall be transferred to another place without the approval of the Council.// . � � e+: • ►�Y �. �, «�► y , -� � • �- • . �- • � � � ' •- �' �� • � �- ..;• •� .�• � • •- • •- - u r' �' _ . � . �- _•. .• • -� - • _� • �- • • i � • � / . • ' � � • • � � ' • • � 11� . �,�• � ' • : �. • � � " � � � . • -� - :�. • ' .• �:.� �� •- • •.� -• � � 11 - � I ' / ' • / � . •,- - �11 � - • - • • � : � • • • � • ' � ' � � • ' - - - • • � ' � • _ � � • . �� • • � • �' �'�. •11.'• �' .- • „ -,. y . � � • - � � • - - 11 1 - - � - •. i� • �' - • • � �- -•• •� �" � � _+ � � � �� - • ��- il.�' • 1 " '' •� • �' � • u- •� -� - -• � - •� .1 1 �- •- �=. ' -� .�� . u-." -� -. �.nu,-��.. •� -�• -�• • �- -� - :�,. � • • •�� • � �' - u. •- . � • �- � •" - • • •� • :��- • - -1� • � �. • � /.� - i�" -� - :�.- • • • � �1- • •� .�� •�• � .�,� •�. � - •- �1• •. • .- =11 � � - .- � .v•-i�.-�-.-.-�-�-�� . - — '- — 1,- /1 � � �11 - � • � ' ' � - : � . • • � - • • _ � ' � � - �► - • - • �_- � • � =d � � - • � � � � � - � � 1 • . • � _ �� . � � � • ' • � - . � • • �.- � - • �J � ' ' � - :��_� • • � - � / - � • • � � " •� 11: ��• • - .//'� �' �-. �• •' �- • �- �-11' • GRAt�II�G OF LIC�ISE GRANTING OF LICIIJSFS 10 602.13. LIABII�ITY II�TRAI�ICE l. EVery person licensed to sell at retail intoxicating liquor or norrintoxicating malt liquor at on-sale or off-sale � on-s le wine shall, after //March// �igiiS.t 1, 1983 , demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by lsinnesota Statutes, Section 340.95 to the //Crnunissioner of Public �etij,// Ci�y�,�rk as a oondition of the issuance or renewal o�f his or her license. Proof of financial responsibility may be given by f iling • A.. A certif icate that there is in effect for ��r�«3 co�r red j�y the license an insurance policy or pool providing the follawing minim�n coverages: (1) 550,000 because of bodily injury to any one person in any one occurrence, and, subject to the limit f or one person, in the amount of 5100,000 because of bodily injury to two or more persons in any one occurrence, and in the amo�nnt of $10,000 because of injury to or destruction of property of others in arzy one occurrence. (2) 550,000 for loss of ineans of support of any one person in any one occurrence, and, subject to the limit for one person, 5100,000 for loss of ineans of sup�p�rt of two or more persons in one occurre�ce; or B. A bond of a surety company with minimum coverages as pravided in clause (A) above, or C. A certif icate of the State Treasurer that the 1 icensee has deposited with the State Treasurer 5100,000 in cash or securities which may legally be purchased by savings banks or for trust funds having a market value of $100,000. //2. An applicant f or a license to sell at retail intoxicating liguor or norrintoxicating malt liquor within the City of Fridley at orr-sale or off-sale shall, after March 1, 19ffi, demonstrate proof of financial responsibility as set forth in Section 602.13.1, to the City of Fridley as a condition for issuance or renewal of his or her license. An applicant for renewal of such a license must c�monstrate proof of such financial responsibility to the City of Fridley at the beginning of each lioense year.// 2. A liability insurance policy required by Section 602.13.1 //and 602.13.2// shall provide that it may not be canceled for any cause, either by the insured or the insurance oompany without f irst giving ten (1Q) days notice to the City of Fridley in writing of the intention to cancel it, addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley. 3. A liability insurance policy required by Section 602.13.1 //and 602.13.2// shall provide that the insurance company agrees to oontact the City of Fridley in writing and addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley, within ten (10) days of any claim made against the policy. 4. A liability insurance policy required by Section 602.13.1 //and � � T � . .. «� 10 � 602.13.2// that oontains annual aggregate limits of liability shall require the insured to buy additional coverage after any claim is made that reduces the covera e under the policy below the requirenents of Section 602.13.1 �/and 602,13.2.// 5. Zl�e operation of a retail intoxicating or norrintoxicating malt liquor business at on-sale or off-sale or on-Ga�e wine, without having on file at all times with the City of Fridley the liability insurance policy or other evidence of f inancial responsibility required under Section 602.13.1 //and 602.13.2// shall be grounds for imnediate revocation of the lioense. Notice of canoellation of a current liquor liability p�licy serves as notice to the licensee of the impending revocation and unless evidence of compliance with the financial responsibility requirenents of Section 602.13.1 //and 602.13.2// is presented to the City C1erk before the termination is effective, the license will be revoked instantly upon the lapse. pASSID p�I,ID p►Dpp►rID gy �IE CIZ'yt �JNCII, OE' �E CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS IY�Y OF , 1984. WII�LIAM J. I�E - MAYOR AZT�'T: SIDI�Y C. II�II�N - CITY (I.ERK First Reading: Second Reading: Publish: 2/8/4/23 10 C .-,.��.. AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AM4��IDII� CHAPi"gt 603, Q�lPI�,m "IN'I'OXICATING LIQUOR", SDC.TIONS 603.07, 603.10, 603.13, 603.16, 603.18, AND 603.22, BY ADDING SECTION 603.15, AND BY DELETING SDC,TION 603.04 The City Coiu�►cil of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: //603.04. RII�TAL R��' l. Applications for the renewal of an existing license shall be made at least 60 days prior to the date of the expiration of the license and shall be made in such abbreviated form as the City Council may approve. If, in the judc�nent of the City Council, good and sufficient cause is shown by an applicant for their failure to file for a renewal within the time provided, the City Council may, if the other prwisions of this Chapter are conplied with, grant the application. 2. At the earliest practicable time after application is made for a renewal of an "on-sale" lioense, and in any event prior to the time that the application is approvec3 by the City Council, the applicant shall file with the City Clerk a statement made by a certified public acoountant that shows the total gross sales and the total food sales of the restaurant for the twelve (12) month period ir�nediately preceding the date for filing rene�wal applications. A foreic� corporation shall file a current Certificate of Authority.// . � � e+: : ►� ►. �, «�► ],,,,, nitial .�censes A. In order to assist the City Council in investigating the facts set out in the application and in order to determine the eligibility of the applicant for a license, pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter and of the State Law, the City Council may appoint a License Board. In the event that such License Board is established, it shall be organized in such a maru�er as the City Council shall determine by resolution. B. All applications for a license shall be referred to the Public Safety Director and to such other City Departrnents as the City Manager shall deem necessary for verification and investigation of the facts set forth in the application. The Public Safety Director shall cause to be mac3e such investigation of the information requested in Section 603.03 as shall be neoessary and shall make a written recamnendation and report to the License Board, or to the City Co�mcil, as the case may be, which shall incluc3e a list of all violations of Federal or State law or Municipal ordinance. �e Lioense Board, or City Council nay order and coriduct such additional investigation as it shall deen neoessazy. C. Upon receipt of the written report and reca�nendation � the Public Safety Director and within twenty (20) days there ter, the Q�airman of the License Board or the City Council, shall GR1�t�TTING OF LIC�]SFS 11 11 A instruct the City Clerk to cause to be published in the official newspaper, ten (10) days in advance, a notioe of a hearing to be held by ti�e License Board or the City Council, setting forth the day, time and place when the hearing will be held, the name of the applicant, the premises where the business is to be ` oonducted, the nature of the business and such other inforniation as the Lioense Board may direct. At the hearing, opportunity ehall be given to any person to be heard for or against the granting of the lioense. A lioense, other than a renewal. shall not be approved before the next regular meeting of the City Co�cil follawing such hearing. //4. I�bt less than ten (10) days nor more than fifteen (15) days after the date foi submitting renewal applications, the License Board or the City Council, shall hold a public hearing. Notice of the time and place of said meeting and the fact that renewal applications will be considered shall be published in the official newspaper, ten (10) days in advance of the hearing. Opport�.a�ity shall be given to any person to be heard for or against the granting of a r�ewal lioense. In the event the License Board holds the hearing, it shall, within f ifteen (15) days after the hearing, make a report of its investigation and hearing together with reca:�nendations, to the City Council. In the event that the Lioense Board is unable to conplete its report within that time, they shall report such fact together with reasons therefore to the City Council which shall extend the time for the report for such reasonable time as it deens advisable.// D. After receiving such report, recor.vnendation, and �ublic � ent for the ini ti�7 1 ic�n�e, the City Council shal l conduct within a reasonable time such additional hearing as it may deem advisable and thereafter shall grant or ref use the application in its discretion. E. Each lioense shall be issued to the applicant only. Each license shall be issued only for the prenises described in the application. No license may be transferred to another person or to another place without oo�nplying with the requirements of an original application, including the approval of the City Council and the Liquor Control Commissioner as reguired, except as pravided by Sections 603.05.5 and 603.05.9. (Ref. 579) F. The City Clerk shall, within ten (10) days after the issuance of ar�y lioense under this Chapter, sut�it to the Liquor Control Car,IInissioner the full name and address of each person granted a license, the trade n�ne, the effective license date, and the date of expiration of the lioense. �e City Clerk shall also subnit to the Liquor Control Commissioner any change of address, transfer, cancellation or revocation of any license by the Qo�cil during the license period. G. Where a lioense is granted to prenises where the building is ua�der construction or otherwise not ready for occupancy, the City Qerk shall not issue the lioense Lmtil notif ication by the Building Inspection Deparbnent that a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued and the building is reac3y for occupancy. (Ref. 579) -�:,. -� - ;.,. .� . �- -��,r- • -� - �. -� �- .- n..- - .1 ._ . • • �- •. - • �- -,�. •� • �- -� � �• �- �." 11.�- � � .�• - -• • 11 � - .�. � u � . � • • - � � - • �ql: � • • - • � � � 11 � � " • � - • • • � • � � - • _ ��III• �� • .� •� .�• •� ' ti. 1- �.' 11.�' • _ ' • / � � - � � • � V� � • � � ' • . � • ' / ' � �• • / � • ' • � , ' " • .• ' IL- ' . •• •� 11-•' • � � ti• • . � • � _ ' � ' . � � � . � ' � • • • � :q� .�i • • � � � � � � ��. � • � • . , • , � • �� • � ' ' . � • � � � ' �� 1 / � � �� .1� � y �1� � • ' ' � . � � � • � ' � . � � � , � � • , � � / � � � � _ � { � � � • � , � � � � � � � �� • ' , � � / � � �� '� 1 •� • �• 11,� 1-� � 1 •. ��' • .�_ q � I !�1 �' '/ - '�' �� /• �. �: � • �11 •' • �. -• • �' - � . � • �� ;,,� �' •. ' . �� 11: . �'� �- '�:r. - . �� •� •' •� •' ;,�� , �- • � �/" -� �• •- �� •' �' �N =.� . � • � �� • . • • - � ' • � • � '� '��. �• •� 603.10. �ITIONS OF LIC�[�TSE EVer� license shall be granted subject to the condition of all Sections of this Chapter ano of any other applicable provision of this Code or State law, including the follaaing: 17. At the time licensees subr�it their applications for renewal of a license, they shall list all direct or indirect contributions made to or on behalf of a candidate for Fridley City Councilperson or t�Iayor, including, but not limited to, Candidates, Committees, Volunteer Cor,unittees, etc., for all City elections //from and including 1969 to the present date.// ��*hin rhp la�t 365 days. 603.13. RF5'IItIC'rIONS II�1VCH.VII�]G MII�]�DRS 6. Persons who may appear to the licensees, their employees or agents to be �der nineteen (19) years of age and who do not have in their pcssession arry i3entification oertificate as above described, may si� and execute a statenent in writing as follows: RE1�D CAREEVLLY BffORE SIGNIl�IG It shall be �mlawful for persons to misrepresent or mi�state their age, or the age of any other person for the purpose of inducing any licensee, their enplayee or agent, or any lioensee, or any employee 11B �IDITIONS OF LI(�]SE • �, • �� ; � ,� � • ' of any municipal liquor store, to sell, serve or deliver any alooholic or norri.ntoxicating malt liquor beverage to a person under ninete� (19) years of age. It is also �lawful for persons under nineteen (19) years of age to have in their possession any intoxicating liquor with intent to consune the same at a place other than the household of their parent or guarciian. Any person who shall violate any of the foregoing pravisions of law shall be p�ished acoordingly. VI�,ATION OF Z�iE ABUJE MINI�'SOTA LAW IS A MISDEMEANOR PUAIISHABLE BY A FII�E OF //$300.00// 5700.00 OR A 90 DAYS WORKHOUSE SENTENCE, OR BC�i. My age is . Date of Birth . Plaoe of Bir*�+ My address is Dated: �rpe of Ic3entif ication, if ar�y Witness Signed T�e above form shall be furnished at the expense of all licensees desiring to use the same and when properly executed may be oonsidered as evioences in any prosecution and by the City Council in any proceeding before the Council or a catIInittee thereof relating to the business or operations of the licensee. Such forms after execution shall be kept on fil e by the licensee for a period of one (1) year. . � : �,� �., � ,,�� , _� �� _ . .i • -� - . .� �- -� �. ._- •,al.• �• •� - .,•�. � �' - -------- •� �1 �- •��• • • • :�� I I - • - .�+ � � �� - ;� • � " �� • - 4� • � - - � ��- ��• •�• •� - • �.. `� " • ' , - ' • � ' • - ' � • • � ' ' � -� • � - • `� ' ' � - - • . • � ' . � ' 1 • ' -� - �'�. - .�• • �' •- •' � •' - -� • .� • •� • .� � • �- •��• �. �� • - �� • �- •• •:.- :�� • • S - ' � ' � - �: =•� � � • � � � � �� y� � � � � � � �� , � � , � � , � , � - � � � � � � � � / � � , • . �� • � � � � , � � � � _ �,�� _ ~ �� • � � ��' • �' �',' • •' � �.• •' ' • � • •- •� - �• •-It-•- • - •� • •- • •� • •' �•�• •� • .1 1!�� • - - • �- •��• • • •� • �' �- � • • :I•. • � n- • - •- . � � • � - � � q� • � � ! - � - =.� • • ' : • ��. 11C 11 D - � - ..- • . . . . u u.,. - - .. _. .,� • ..- _ - . - 603.16. LI.ABII.ITY IIYS�1R?�NCE �II'� l. EVery person lioensed to sell at retail intoxicating liquor or �� norrintoxicating malt liquor at orrsale or aff-sale or on-sa?e wine shall, after //March// BuguS_� l, 1983, demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.95, to the //Cannissioner of Public Safety// City Clerk as a oondition of the issuance or renewal of his or her license. Proof of financial responsibility may be given by filing: A. A certif icate that there is in effect an insurance policy or pool providing the follawing minimun ooverages: (1) S50,000 because of bodily injury to any one person in any one occurrence, and, subject to the limit f or one person, in the amount of $100,000 because of bodily injury to two or more persons in any one occurrence, and in the a�no�t of $10,000 because of injury to or destruction of property of others in any one occurrence. (2) $50,000 for loss of ineans of support of any one person in ar�y one occurrence, and, subject to the limit for one person, $100,000 for loss of ineans of support of two or more persons in one occurre�ce; or B. A bond of a surety company with minimum coverages as pravided in clause (A) above, or C. A certif icate of the State Treasurer that the licensee has deposited with the State Treasurer 5100,000 in cash or securities which may legally be purchased by savings banks or for trust funds having a market value af $100,000. //2. Ari applicant for a license to sell at retail intoxicating liquor or norr-intoxicating malt liquor within the City of Fridley at orrsale or off-sale shall, after March 1, 1983, demonstrate proof of financial responsibility as set forth in Section 603.16.1, to the City of Fridley as a condition for issuance or renewal of his or her license. An applicant for renewal of such a 1 icense must der.�onstrate proof of such financial responsibility to the City of Fridley at the beginning of each lioense year.// 2. A liability insurance policy required by Section 603.16.1 //and 603.16.2// shall prwide that it may not be canceled for any cause, either by the insured or the insurance oompany without f irst giving ten (10) days notice to the City of Fridley in writing of the intention to cancel it, addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley. 3. A liability insurance policy required by Section 603.16.1 //and 603.15.2// shall provide that the insurance cor�pany agrees to oontact the City of Fridley in writing and addressed to the City Qerk of the City of Fridley, within ten (10) days of any claim made against the policy. 4. A liability insurance policy required by Section 603.16.1 //and 11E 603.16.2// that oontains annual aggregate limits of liability shall require the insured to buy additional coverage af ter any claim is made that reduces the covera e under the policy below the requirenents of Section 603.16.1 �/and 603.16.2.// 5. �e operation of a retail intoxicating or norrintoxicating malt liquor business at on-sale or off-sale Qr on-s ie �r'�, without having on file at all times with the City of Fridley the liability insurance policy or other evidence of f inancial responsibility tequired under Section 603.16.1 //and 603.16.2// shall be grounds for inmediate revocation of the lioense. Notioe of cancellation of a currer►t liqu�r liability policy serves as notice to the licensee of the impending revocation and unless evidence of compliance with the financial responsibility requiranents of Section 603.16.1 //and 603.16.2// is pzesented to the City Clerk before the termination is effective, the lioense will be revoked instantly up�n the lapse. n Z4�e Citv Clerk shall submit the provided proQf of fin�ncial �p�,�nSil?il itv to the �*�+� GG� on r of � 1 ic safPt� . 603 .l 8. I�I'I(E Except in the case of suspension pending a hearing or immediate revocation for failure to have on f ile at all times with the City the liability insurance policy or other. evidence of financial responsibility required under Sections 603.15 and 603.16, a revocation or suspension by the Council shall be preceded by written notice to the licensee and a public hearing. Zl�e notice shall give at least //eight (8)// ten (10) days notioe of the time and place of the hearing and shall state the nature of the charges against the licensee. ZY�e Council may, without any notice, suspend any license pending a hearing on revocation for a period not exceeding 30 days. Zl�e notice may be served upon the licensee personally or by leaving the same at the licensed pr enises with the person in charge thereof. No suspension shall exceed 60 days. I�OTIC� 603.22. WII� LIC�ISE w� 4. Zl�e pravisions of Sections 603.01 to 603.21 above shall apply to LI(�ISE "On-Sale Wine Licenses" insofar as practicable, as they relate to: Definitions; Applications; //Renewal; Procedure for// Granting of Licenses; Persons and Places Ineligible; Conditions of License; Hours of Operation; Restrictions Involving Minors; Other Restrictions on Purchase or Consunption; ��; Liability Insurance; Notice and Hearing on Suspension or Revocation of Lioense; Alteration of Prenises; and Penalties. (Ref. 611) pp�� p�,ID p�pppp) gy �3E CITY �1AlCII. QF � CITY OF FRIDLEY �4iIS L1AY OF , 1984. WII�LIAM J. l�E - MAYOR ATtffiTs SID�I�'Y C. Il�N - CITY Q�E�tR First Reading: Second Reading: Publish: 2/8/4/24 11 F � -�. � �• � • AN ORDINANCE REOODIFYING T4�iE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AN��IDZNG �iAPI'E�t 605 � ENTI� "II�TIOXIC�►TII� LIQUORS — (I�UBS", SDCTIOl�LS 605.13, 605.15 AND 605.17, DELETING SECTION 605.07 ArID BY A�II�1G A I�1 SECTION 605.07 AIJD SDCTION 605.14 �he City Coimcil of the City of Fridley does ordain as follvws: //605.07. t�2ANrII�1G OF LI(�iSE 1. T�e Public Safety Director shall investigate all facts set out in the application including a consideration of the building with regard to zoning and building ordinances and the proximity of schools and churches and shall give op�p�rtunity to any person to be heard for or against the granting of the lioense on reguest. 2. After such investigation and hearing, the City Council shall grant or refuse the lioense in accordance with the provisions of this (�apter.// . 1 1 et:: ►IYI�. �: «��'1 � -� - � • •- • . �- • r � � - .. �• �- - . � �- .r. �[� •� •�• � . .- . .- - n �- �- - • • • � - . • • . � • - � " • . � • � ' • • •� • / 1-• - .�• • �- - �' • I 11� ��• / '� :�. • � �' - -� �- � -� - :��. • .• �� . •- • •. � -• � • 11-�I" �" ! � �- •' -�11 �- • ' • •� . • • • � • - � - � . • - - - - • • � - �.• - � :� • ��• • � • �' �-�� 11: • •' � � � � • - � - • - - Q � " ' • • / " � ! 1 •� •� • •' ' • � � �' . •� •� V� � � • - � :� • •� - • ��- ��' • � - •� •� • � ' � • 11 - • 1 '. - -• � - •� •1 1' �- •- �� - • -I� �- 11�• - 'I =. �,1111: �� •� .�• - �� • � ' - � : � . • • • � _ • � • ' ' 11 - • - . � � �� I •' • • •� • ��- • ' •�. • M ♦ �. • • �.� - �/" -� - :�,. • • • � �1. • •' . �• •�• � ��• •�� - •_ •� �- •-�il �� - ♦ �.- «� � �11 - 1 • � � ' � : � � • • � ' _ • � - � ' �l��! �,' • �l • - - � - :��,� • • � - • � - � • • � ��- • . 11: - � • • - ./� � � � - � ' - � • • ' � ' • • - 1 - 11 - • • - . • • - � • ' • - !1 ' . � - - • ' • � - • • ' �� • �.� � ' � � - • � ' • � - . � • � • � ' 1 � �II � • � ,' ', ' :�� • 11� • ' �' •' � • • ��• • _ � . ' � . � �.' • � • • - � ' • • • � • . � � � ��' • • C:RANrIl�G OF LI(�1SE GftAI�TrII�G OF LICE�ISFS � ,�1 .�t�: �,�i�,� � _�• •� • -� •� - • - �� • -� - • �,� - �- -� - �. �,- �.u�.� =.� • �.�� • � �' -�n� � • lil 1{ �� • • �- • • - • � " �.- _.• • • � a.� - ,� - ��n.- / �.� � • • =.�1 ' � u . - i� - ��• •�• •� - • •..f- `� ' - � �" • • - � - - � • • � ' - • ' • • � - • i�' -/ " •. • �- .•'� • _ -� .-�_ - .�� • �- �_ •- 1 �- - -� • .� • •� • .� • • �- •��• � � �� • - �� • � - �, • • _.' .,— - _----�_i -� - •- •' -• � �" " '�• � �• • �� • �' � � -�• �" !,1111 •�' • j • ' ��• �� ' • �- �� ' • �' •• •" -�• ��- -�';--�- - -,' � • • � � •. • � 11� • •' �� • � � I •. i�� • � � � � � ' ' • • � ' � �� •� • '� �� • �' � • �. � • • � ' 11: I • � � • • _ _ :� � ;,,��1 ' • . • • - � � �� • • � • • 11 11.=.� - ' �. - • � • � ' ' • 605.15. LIABILITY IIISZJRANC� 1. E�ery person licensed to sell at retail intoxicating liquor or non-intoxicating malt liquor at orrsale or off-sale � orrsale w?ne shall, after //March// Bl3g� 1, 1983 , demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by rlinnesota Statutes, Section 340.95, to the //Co�rclissioner of Public Safety// C�y Clerk as a condition of the issuance or renewal of his or her license. Proof of financial responsibility may be given by f il ing : A. A certificate that there is in effect �.�r the �eriod cavered �y the ?�cense an insurance policy or pool� providing the follvwing minim�an coverages: (1) $50,000 because of boc3ily injury to any one person in any one occurrence, and, subject to the limit for one person, in the aQnount of $100,000 because of bodily injury to two or more persons in any one occurrence, and in the aQno�t of 510,000 because of injury to or destruction of property of others in ar►y one occurrence. : • �.. �� « �B 12 C (2) S50,000 for loss of ineans of sup�port of an� one person in any one occurrence, and, subject to � t of twofor more person, 5100,000 for loss of ineans of suppo persons in one occurrence; or B. A bond of a surety company with minimum coverages as prwided in clause (A) abave, or C. A certificate of the State Treasurer that the licensee has cleposited with the State Treasurer $100,000 in cash or securities which may legally be purchased by savings banks or for trust fumds having a market value of $100,000. //2. An applicant for a license to sell at retail intoxicating liquor or norr intoxicating malt liquor within the City of Fridley at orrsale or off-sale shall, after riarch 1, 1983, demonstrate proof of financial responsibility as set forth in Section 605.15.1, to the City of Fridley as a condition for issuance or renewal of his or her license. An applicant for renewal of such a license must denonstrate proof of such financial responsibility to the City of Fridley at the beginning of each license year./J 2. A liability insurance policy required by Section 605.1 5.1 //and 605.15.2// shall pravicle that it may not be canceled for any cause, either by the insured or the insurance cor��ny without f irst giving ten (10) days notice to the City of Fridley in writing of the intention to cancel it, addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley. 3. A liability insurance policy required by Section 605.1 5.1 //and 605.15.2// shall provide that the insurance company agrees to contact the City of Frid].ey in writing and addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley, within ten (10) days of any claim made against the policy. 4. A liability insurance policy required by Section 605.1 5.1 //and 605.15.2// that oontains arinual aggregate limits of liability shall require the insured to buy adnitional coverage af ter any claim is made that reduces the coverage under the policy below the requiLene�ts of Section 605.15.1 //and 605.15.2.// 5. ZY�e operation of a retail intoxicating or norr-intoxicating malt liquor business at on-sale or off-sale 9r on-Gai� wine, without having on file at all times with the City of Fridley the liability insurance policy or other evidence of f inancial responsibility required under Section 605.15.1 //and 605.15.2// shall be grounds for imnediate revocation of the license. Notioe of cancellation of a current liquor liability policy serves as notice to the licensee of the impending revocation and unless evidence of .compliance with the financial resp�nsibility requirenents of Section 605.15.1 //and 605.15.2// is presented to the City C1erk before the termination is effective, the license will be revoked instantly upon the lapse. o 'I� Ci�• r.,,ao �ti,at 1 ai�hmi t the p �nf A�h1 i _ S�f et� . 605.17. REVOCATION �� e violation of any provision of this Chapter by a licensee or agent, shall be gro�ds for revocation or suspension of the lioense. Except as pravided in Sections 605.14 and 605.15, before a license is revoked, the licensee shall be provided with written notice setting out the nature of the charges against the licensee and setting a date for hearing before the City Council, not less than //eight ( 8) // t�n (101_ days f ro[a the serviae of said Notioe. pA�S� p►i�ID p►DppPID gy ZfIE CITY �1NCIL O�F 7SE CITY OF FRIDLEY TBIS L1AY OF . 1984. WII�LIAM J. I�E - MAYf)R ATI'FST: SIDI�'Y C. II�,N - CITY Q�II2R First Reading: Second Reading: Publish: 2/ 8/4/20 �D . -,. � ►. « . AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING 'I4iE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY Al�'d�IDII� �P'I'ER 606, FNTIZi�ID "IldI�OXIC�►TII�1G LIQUORS - �RFSSI�I.LY CHARTERID VETERANS' ORGANIZATIONS" � SECTIONS 606.08 AND 606.14 AND BY ADDING SECTIONS 606.07, 606.09 At�ID 606.11 Zl�e City Council of the City of Fridley does orc3ain as follvws: . � . � : �,�u.. _ - ---. -•� -• '. - -,- -y-,-, _ • .=. • � - 1 Y� - . • � . �_ �� - � . �- .- •. . - :,. . •- -� - ��- .��• •�• •� - _ . •..a ��' -� -- ••- �- �. . �- -� -. • �- • ��' -� - •. • �- .•-� • - -� - �-�. .�• • �- �. •- / �- - '� • .� • •� • .� • • �- •��• � � ��' • :�� • • ' � • • - i�/� • •� - '� ' •• ��- �.! � 1- • �• .�'• • :�� • �'• • � :��• • • - -� '�� -- ' . . - ■_ •- -• . � �" - ' •• �� - �� • �- �-�' • / ' �,• • " - � • � - • � - � • � � 11 - • - • - . • � • � - • . • � • • ' '�� •� • •1• 1 �� • - • �� •��• • • •� • � ' � - � � • : � • . . • � 11 . • � " ��• �-�. i�� • .� �. �- y� • •' �,�- •� • '� �.� • �' �• /- � • • � - 11: I • �' • • - - � - � :.�{ ' • . • • �� ; • • �� • uU.=.� - � . •� • �- -� ' 606.08. LIABII�ITY II�LS�l12ArlC� 1. �Lery person licensed to sell at retail intoxicating liquor or norrintoxicating malt liqu�r at ort-sale or off-sale or on-sale wine shall, after //March// �ig1lS_t 1, 1983, demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.95 to the //Canmissioner of Putlic Safety// �,i�� a condition of the issuance or renewal of his or her lioense. Proof of financial responsibility may be given by f iling : A. A certif icate that there is in ef fect f or h�r i pa cavered j�y the license an insurance policy or pool providing the following minim� coverages: : • �. _ LIABILITY INSURANC� 13 13a (1) $50,000 because of bodily injury to any one person in any one occurrence, and, subject to the limit for one person, in the a�ownt of $100,000 because of bodily injury to two or more persons in any one occurrence, and in the aQno�t of $10,000 because of injury to or destruction of property of others in arry one occu=rence. (2) 550,000 for loss of ineans of supp�rt of any one person � fn any one occurrence, and, subject to the limit for one person, $100,000 for loss of ineans of support of two or more persons in one occurrence; or B. A bond of a surety company with minimum coverages as provic3ed in clause (A) above, or C. A certif icate of the State Treasurer that the licensee has deposited with the State Treasurer $100,000 in cash or securities which may legally be purchased by savings banks or for trust funds having a market value of $100,000. //2. An applicant for a license to sell at retail intoxicating liquor or norrintoxicating malt lic�uor within the City of Fridley at on-sale or off-sale shall, aftez FSarch l, 1983, desnonstrate proof of financial responsibility as set forth in Section 606.06.1, to the City of Fridley as a condition for issuance or renewal of his or her license. An applicant for renewal of such a license must denonstrate proof of suc� financial responsibility to the City of Fridley at the beginning of each lioense year.// 2. A liability insurance policy required by Section 606.0 8.1 //and 606.08.2// shall pravic3e that it ma}� not be canceled for any cause, either by the insured or the insurance oaapany without f irst giving ten (10) days notice to the City of Fridley in writing of the intention to cancel it, addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley. 3. A liability insurance policy requirea by Section 606.0 8.1 //and 606.08.2// shall provide that the insurance company agrees to contact the City of Fridley in writing and addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley, within ten (10) days of any claim made against the policy. 4. A liability insurance policy required by Section 606.0 8.1 //and 606.08.2// that oontains annual aggregate limits of liability shall require the insurec3 to buy additional coverage af ter any claim is made that reduces the coverage under the policy below the requirenents of Section 606.08.1 //and 606.08.2.// 5. Tl�e operation of a retail intoxicating or norr-intoxicating malt liquor business at on-sale or off-sale 9r on-sale wine, without having on file at all times with the City of Fridley the liability insurance policy or other evidence of financial responsibility required under Section 606.08.1 //and 606.08.2// shall be grounds for imc�ediate revocation of the lioense. Notioe of cancellation of a current liquor liability p�licy serves as notice to the licensee of the impending revocation anc] unless evic3ence of compliance with the financial responsibility requirenents of Section 606.0 8.1 //and 606.08.2// is presented to the City Qerk before the termination is 606.14. RF.VOCATION In addition to the provisions for revocation in Chapter 11 of this Code, any license granted hereunder may be revoked by the City Council for cause. Cause for revocation shall be violation by the licensee or its employees of any law of the State of Minnesota relating to intoxicating liquor or violatian by the lioensee or its enployees of any provision or oonc]ition of this Chapter. //Except as prwided in Section 606.08, a license shall be deemed revoked upon the passage of the City Council of a resolution to that effect, and no portion of the license fee paid shall be returned upon revocatiOn.// ��.Dt as as �rovided �n �tiorL 606 07 and 606.0 8. ��f�*� � i; ��*+�� is revoked. the 7 icensee shal l be �ovided w? t_h . . �. - ..� -• � ._ .,�� - - - . _ . �. - �. .. .• . �- -� - -- ._ . .. .- - �-. ..� - .. . . � a� • n • �� • �� : � •� � • � • . �� • WII�LIAM J. I�E - MAYOR ATI'ESZ': SIDI�'Y C. II�N - CITY C[.E.'RK First Reading: Seoond Reading: Publish: 2/ 6/4/21 �vocATT� 13 D 14 a�n�r� r�. _________ J�N pRDINANCE RECODIFYING Ri�E PRIDLEY CITY CODE BY At+��II� �AP'i�F� 607 , II1rI�.m ' LIL�3�LSE' ► SB(.'TION 607.06 ArID BY ADDII� SD(.TIUN 607.05 �e City Co�a�►ci1 of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: . � � :.�,� !. 1.- :,� � • 1� :,� � .- - .• �q� - � � �,� ��i� ��1 ! ��ti�NY-I�YaN � � . � � - • � � • - • • •,�� V I / ' • -�• _ � . �_- � - - • �.- � - � • �• - :�� .- " • ��,- ��• •�• •,� - • •..r- ��" .- � .- - • � ' � " - � • • � ' ' � ' • • � - • `�.� ' , ' � � • i - . � - � • - - � - � ' / . - . � • • � ' � - •. - � 3„ B�nds for "on-s le" licenses shall be fil� ��th t� City lerk �g,_�rov�; bX.�he Citv Counc�],� Bonds fnr "o f-s e" licenses �d �,..�..�,�� ,;.,�, l:r�oncnc cha11 hca fi1pA vith the CitY �lerk 3Ilf� �,• .-- •�] h�.� • • � • . 1 1 l� � � • - - • � - • � � • • • • • • �- •- � • • :��.. • � u- • - �' � �, � • � - � � qi • - � ! - • ' G.� • � �" �� • � • ' � �� • • ' � • � � • • • � ' It.' / / ' • I • - ' ' - ,r. ;.�1 - • . • • ' ' � �� • � ' � � �� .1� � � �� _� �i� � � � .� � • : . �.. 607.06. LI�IBILITY II�3RAN�E LIASILITY 1. Every person lioensed to sell at retail intoxicating liquor or II�1S�JR��NCE norr-intoxicating malt liquor at orrsale or of f-sale Qr �-sa? e wi ne shal l, af ter //March// Aligli�t 1, 1983 , demonstr ate pr oof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by M.i,nresota Statut�s, Section 340.95, Go the //Ccm�nissioner of Public Safety// S,i� � a��ition af the issuanae or reneMral of his or her lioense. Proaf of f inancial resp�nsibil ity may be given by filing: A. A oertif icate that there is in ef fect f�_r��Priod �� y the ?icen�e an insurance policy or pool providinq the following minimm coverages: (1) 550,000 because of bodily injury to any one person in any one occurrence, and, subject to the limit for one � 14 A person, in the mno«,t of S100,000 because of bodilY injury to two or more persons in any one occurrence, and in the amo�t of $10�000 because of injury to or destruction of property of others in any one occurrenoe. � (2� $50,000 for loss of ineans of support of an�► one person in ary one occurrence, and, subject to the limit for one person, S100,000 for loss of ineans of support of two oz mre , persor�s in ore occurr�ce; or : .$. A bond of a surety comgany with minimum coverages as � p�ovided in clsuse (A) abave, or . C. A oertificate of the State Treasurer that the licensee has deposited with the State Treasurer S100,000 in cash or �ecurities which may legally be purchased by savings banks or for trust f�ds having a market value of S100.000. //2. An applicant for a license to sell at retail intoxicating liquor or norrintoxicating malt liquor within the City of Fridley at or�-sale or off-sale shall, after Ma�rch 1, 1963, denonstrate proof of financial responsibility as set forth in Section 607.06.1, to the City of Fridley as a condition for issuance or renewal of his or her lioense. An applicant for renewal of such a license must d�nonstrate proof of such f inancial responsibil ity to the City of Fridley at the beginning of each lioense year.// , 2. A liability insurance policy required by Section 607.06.1 //and 607.06.2// shall pravide that it may not be canceled for any cause, either by the insured or the insurance ooa►PanY without f irst giving ten (10) days notice to the City of Fridley in writing of the int�tion to cancel it, addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley. 3. A liability insuranoe policy required by Section 607.06.1 //and 607.06.2// shall provide that the insurance company agrees to oontact the City of Fridley in writing and addressed to the City Clerk of the City of Fridley. within t� (10) days of ar�y claim mac3e against the policy. 4. A liability insurance policy required by Section 607.06.i I/ana 607.06.2// that oontains annual aggregate limits of liability sh all require the insured to buy additional coverage af ter any claim is made that reduces the coverage under the policy below the requirenents of Section 607.06.1 //and 607.46.2.// 5. Tbe operation of a retail intoxicating or nort-intoxicating malt liquor business at on-sale or of f-sale Q� c3n-sale w'Lne, without having on file at all times with the City of Fridley the liability . insurance policy or other evidence of financial responsibility =eqw,rc�c3 undez Section 607.06.1 //and 607.06.2// shall be grounds for inmediate revocation o� the lioense. Notioe of cancellation of a curre�t liquor liability p�lic.y serves as notice to the licensee ��e i�ending reyocation and �ailess evidenoe of compliance with the financial responsibility requirenents af Section 607.06.1 //and 607.06.2,// is presented to the City Qerk before thenttheiiat� n is .effective, the lioense wi11 be revoked iristantlY uPo P Q � �� 1prk shatl s�b�it �_�rov_Droof of fin�ncfal �� ihility � t�' r�; s�ioner of �? ic Safet� p�ID � p�pp� gy �E CITy QxTNCII, OF' �E CITY OF FRIDLEY �9IS �,y pF _ , 1984. ATIEST: SIDI�Y C. II�Mi�1N - CITY Q.IIZR First Reading: Second Reading: Publish: ?,/8/4/26 WII�LIAM J. 1�E - �1+WYOR ! 1� B CITY OF FRIDLEY PLAN��ING COMt1ISSI0N MEETING, FEBRUARY 29, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: 15 Chairwoman Schnabei called the February 29, 1984, P]anning Commission meetinc� to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL: Mer�bers Present: Ms. Schnabe], Mr. Oquist, Ms. Gabel. F1r. Nielson (for Mr. Svanda), Mr. Kondrick, Mr. Goodspeed, Mr. Saba Me�r�bers Absent: None Otl�ers Present: John Flora, Public Warks Director Jim Robinson, Planning Specialist Dennis Schneider, City Councilman T�m Brickner, 6249 Ben More Dr. Marge arickner, 6249 Ben �4ore Or. Curtis A. Larson, 6730 Madison St. N.E. Dona Larson, 6730 Nadison St, t�.E. (See attached list) APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 8, 1984, PLA�dP�ING COt1MI55I�P� MINUTES: MO^IOl: B2' �!P.. I:ONDRICK, SECOIlDED BY MR. SABA, TU APPROVE THL FEB. 8, 19R4, PIJWNING COM!lISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEl�. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNATP.�IOMAN SCNNABEL DECLA7?ED TII� 1�!OTIOI: CAFtRIED UNANIMOUSLi'. Mr. Flora stated that both the City Planner, Mr. Boardman, and Associate Planner, Mr. Deblon, have left the City. He stated he would be filling in as staff to the Planning Cormission for a couple of ineetings. Mr. Flora introduced Jim Robinson, who was now the Planning Specialist. He stated Mr. Robinson will be working with the Planning Commission sometime in the future. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: C and 5, Auditor's Su Arthur Streets N.E. DERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #84-01, BRICKNER: Being a replat of parts of Lots 2, 3, vision No. 10, generally located at 66th and MO"_'ION BY MR. OQUIST, SECOPIDED BY l�II2. KONDP.ICK, T10 OPEN THE PUBLIC HEP.P.ING OIV P.S. #i84-01 BY THOMAS BRICIQVER. UPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIR410MAIJ SCHNABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC biEARING OPEN AT 7; 35 P.il. 15 A PLANNIf�G COMMISSION MEETING, FESRUARY 29. 1984 ___ PAGE 2 Mr. Flora stated they have received a request from Mr. Brickner for a preliminary plat for the Creekridge area, essentially the Rice Creek School property. Mr. Brickner has an option to purchase that property from School Dist. 14 and develop it as R-1 residential housing. Mr. Flora stated Mr. Brickner's plat identifies a total of 29 residential properties which would conform to city code and, as identified, a five-lot section of about .9 acres for a city park development. Mr. Flora stated that City Code. Chapter 211, requires that 10"� of any large plat be dedicated for a park, or like amount of money. Since there has been a lot of use of the park equipment on the school property by the residents (tennis court, baseball field, basketball court, hockey) in thP neighborhood, Staff felt there was a need for a park in this area. The closest park is at Harris Lake. He stated Staff also had a problem with a parcel of only ,9 acres in that it was relatively small and would not provide enough space to provide the services that are necessary for the neighborhood. Mr. Fl�ra stated Staff lookeG at the entire area between Central Avenue, Stinson Blvd., Rice Creek and Mississippi Street. The a rea is relative- ly developed, except for three parcels of undeveloped land. These are. the Rice Creek School property, the 6ena-Rae Addition and a portion of property adjacent to the Gena-Rae Addition. In looking at the total area, Staff felt they could, through the subdivision ordinance, obtain around 1.8 to 1.9 acres of city park from all of this development to support the neigh- borhood. The Parks 8 Recreation Director would prefer something closer to 3 acres, as this would be an adequate size to provide tennis, basketball, baseball, outdoor recreation, and a tot lot, for this neighborhood. Accordingly, they have continued to study the Brickner plat to designate a park of 2 1/2 acres and still provide Mr. Brickner with 22 buidable lots, a re duction f rom the 24 lots he originally had in his proposal. It was thought that the City would purchase the two additional lots from Mr. Brickner. Mr. Flora stated Mr. Brickner has some feelings about having a park directly to the rear of his develapment, but the City feels that if a park is to be provided in this neighborhood, the less than one acre provided by this plat would not provide sufficient space and would not provide for the services needed by the neighborhood. Ms. Schnabel stated that other than the park property in question, were there any other staff concerns in terms of the plat as proposed? Mr. Flora stated, no, Staff has no problem with the plat as �roposed. It ties in with the existing 66th Ave. and forms a lnop onto Arthur St., which will provide relatively good lots. The proposal for either a cul-de-sac or a continuation of a road into the property which may be developed to the west, provides some flexibility for future development. The only concern ].5 B PLANNING COMt1ISSI0N MEETING. FEBRUARY �9, 1984 PAGE 3 found by Staff was the question of a park, and the property currently advocated by Mr. Brickner for the park was inadequate to service the needs of the neighborhood. Mr. Flora stated the park evisioned by Staff would provide an access from three sides, but there would be no street tie-in. He stated Staff has looked at many othe^alternatives, but they feel this alternative provides for the best use of the property iri the planned development. Ms. Gabel stated that in the Feb, 13, 1984, Parks & Recreation Comnission minutes, there was some discussion with reference to a substandard piece of land for a park because of the �rainage onto it. Mr. Flora stated Staff has d�sre�ar•ded the southwestern site because it was a low, wet area. Ms. Schnabel asked Mr. Brickner if he would like to make some comments. Mr. Brickner stated that first of all, he wanted to say that he has been a resident of Fridley for over 25 years, and he definitely has an interest in the community. His children have played in city parks, and he did not want it to seem like he was trying to deprive the neighborhood of a park. He stated he cou7d see several problems with the latest proposal of 2.5 acres for a city park. He stated he is obligated by city ordinance to donate .938 acres of land. He had a little problem with that requirement, too. He stated there is about an acre of land that is in the watershed area by the creek. He was not so sure that it was his obligation to donate lOb of that land, too, because it is undeve7opable land. He believed the .938 acres included that portion of land down in the low land. The area he has designated for park area is 10% of the whole area including the low land. Mr, Brickner stated the 2.5 acres o�f park land proposed by the City would be com�letely surrounded by houses. Where would people coming to the park in cars park, other than in front o�� the new houses? Secondly, the 30 ft. walkway to the park presented sor.iewlhat of a problem. The only access to the park was next to one of his new proposed houses, so there would be no way to come off the street, other than �longside some new houses. When the park was planned in the southwestern corner, he had planned six lots around a nice cul-de-sac. One lot would be �djacent. to the park. Now, all of a sudden, the City wants nine lots ad;jacent to the park. Ne would have eight 7ots on Arthur St. versus four lots on Arthur St. He thought everyone at the meeting would agree with him th�t lots on a cul-de-sac were more desirable and more saleable than lo1�s on Arthur St. From his standpoint, these were the problems he saw with the 2.5 acres of choice land going for a park, Mr. Brickner stated there are some future developments to the west. He stated he and Staff discussed a lot of different layouts including the low lots. He I�ad proposed one layout that he thought was very nice. It was 15G PLANNIwG COMMi5S10N MEETiNG, FEBRUARY 29, 1984 PAGE 4 taking .938 acres from his property in the southwestern corner� abutting the Gena-Rae Addition; then as the Gena-Rae Addition property developed, it could become part of the park system and, as the need arose, it could grow into the 2.5 acres. He would develop the .938 acres and whoever developed the vacant property would do their part. He stated he thou�ht �t was a shame to give up choice buildable lots when the park equipment could be moved. Mr. Brickner stated that when he purchased the property, he had intended to have a nice development. He thought that with the park system as proposed by the City. it would not be the development he had originally anticipated. Another factor was that by putting the park in the middle of the develo�ment, there are no street assessments against the City of Fridley Park �epartment� because it has no road frontage whatsoever. Ne stated he has not seen any other parks in the City of Fridley that were completely surrounded by houses with no street frontage. Mr. Goodspeed asked what kind of use would go on in the city park,and what kind of use was there right now on the school property. Mr. Flora stated that currently, there is a tennis court, a basketball court, a hockey rink, and a baseball field. The city park would essentially uti- liie the tennis court, the basketball court. hockey would continue. there would be a tot lot, a passive play area, and a neighborhood ball park. So, the usage would be essentially the same as it was right now. Mr. Goodspeed asked what tould be done about the car situation. Mr. Flora stated that when they laid this development out, there was a possibility of of putting a drive on the southern end of the park off Arthur Street, with a parkinn area. Mr. Flora Stated that, again, from the three parcels of undeveloped land, about two acres of park land would be required. The Park Department Director feel that three acres is a good-sized park, so the City would be required to acquire some land above and beyond the 10': requirement to satisfy the three acre need. Looking long range at .938 acres on the Rice Creek property, and small parcels in the other undeveloped properties, it was not going to provide the facilities they feel they need to service the neighborhood. If there is going to be a pa�^k, the staff feels there should be a total park they can plan for and that will provide the facilities they feel are appropriate for the neighborhood. Mr. Schneider stated he Nould like to make two clarifications: (1) He stated Mr. Brickner is only required to give the City..938 acres for park land. He stated the City is not talking about just taking more land. There would be negotiations with Mr. Brickner and Mr, Bricker would be compensated for any additional land. (2) The proposed park would do more than just service this development and the future development of the other undeveloped areas. It also has to servite all of Arthur St., Anoka St., and Fridley St. 15 D PLANNIt�G COMI�ISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 29, 1984 PAGF 5 Mr. Saba asked why sane area from the Gena-Rae Addition couldn't be developed into same park property with some kind of compromise between Mr. Brickner and the City Park Dept. Mr. Flora stated that was possible, but right now the property in the Gena-Rae Addition is not available. There is a current plat in the Gena- Rae Addition for a cul-de-sac off Mississippi St, with the intention of a number of lots off the cul-de-sac. The other vacant property is currently just open 7ots. Ms. Schnabel asked if there were any comments from people in the audience. Mr. Ken Moxness, 1604 - 66th Ave. N.E., stated he would suggest the Planning Commission not take any action on this plat at this meeting. There was no rush that it be acted on at this meeting. He stated this is the first school property to be sold in the demolished state and not to be used as a school or a public building. This is the first school land where the play- ground equipment is not goinc� to be available to the children. He stated there are probably around 300-400 children within walking distance of this playground. 'fhe children are used to having access to this playground and its equipment. The children have been able to go over and look down on �he Creek, It is an edm/r�ble public access to the Rice Creek area, He stated access to the creek area here is not only for the children, but for all the residents of F'ridley. He would like to see the park on the edge of the precipice overlooking Rice Creek. He stated the children are losing their scf�ool and now there is a chance they will be losing their playground. He felt the children should gain by having the nice part of the property. Mr. Curtis Loschy, 1399 - 66th Ave. N.E „ stated his lot was adjacent to the school property so he was familiar with the playground usage. The pro- posed plan by the City would not include the usahle portion of the present tennis court, so the tennis court would still have to be moved. The tennis court is only about three years old. Regarding Rice Creek, he was the chairperson for the Fridley portion of the bikeway/walkriay trail for Anoka County. He stated he has wall;ed the Creek extensively, and there was no possibility of access to the creek bed from the school property. There was a cliff with a sharp drop-off, so without a major construction effort, that area would not be usable for anything. Mr. Loschy stated he has looked at Mr. Brickner's layout at the hearings with the School Board. As a neighbor, he found the use of the land very pleasing. It would be qoing back on the tax roles. As far as the present park, they would certainly like to see a larger park. This area not only services everyone east of Old Central, but it also services a large area that is west of Old Central. There is a considerable amount of foot traffic that comes down 66th Ave. and utilizes this area, not on7y for tennis, but also for the playground equipment. The neighborhood would like to see more park access. So, he would really like to see the City look into the possi- bility of acquiring some of the open land in the Gena-Rae Addition. 15 E PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 29, 1984 � PAGE 6 Mr. Richard Johnson, 6536 Arthur St. N.E., stated that if the park was put on the back lots that are about 5 ft. lower than the school property, would the City fill that up and leave the lot to the east low so all the water would run down onto his property? Also, if there was going to be a parking lot by the park, that parking lot dould be by his bedroom. He stated traffic is very heavy now, especially in the sumner with the use of the ballfield. He stated the park should be moved out onto Arthur St. Mr. Flora stated that right now there are no plans to do anything with the drainage. He stated that, regarding the parking lot, there is the possi- bility of providing some access to the pr�posed park with some parking, but they do not know where it a�ould be at this time. Mr. Roland Zacharias, 1837 - 66th Ave. N.E., siated that the City should do some work in trying to see if some more land could be obtained from the Gena-Rae Addition. Mr. Brickner stated he could not understand why, if everyone on the staff, the neighbors, and Mr. Schneider have known that three acres were needed for a park, that wasn't in the proposal when he bought the land. The City of Fridley had his preliminary proposal for two months before he bouqht the land. Everything was fine then. It was not until he bought the property that he found the City wanted 2�,-3 acres and it all has to come out of one area. He stated obtaining some land in the Gena-Rae Addition where there is no development would solve the problems for everyone involved. He wanted to emphasize that using prime building lots for park land was not in the best interest of anyone. As a taxpayer, he would like to see the best use of the land and the most revenue coming back to the City through taxes. Mr. Herb Bacon, 159 Logan Parkway, stated parks seem to go through cycles. For example, they have Logan Park, and it is hardly being used now. He stated he personally felt they should concentrate on what they have got, take whatever they can get, and put the money toward those parks. Mr. Schneider stated he has been in this neighbarhood a number of ti�Ps, even prior to being on tfie City Council. One of the things he has al��ay5 heard before he was elected Councilman was the inadequacy of the parks in this area. He did work toward putting the tennis court there 3-4 years ago. At that time, he felt it was worth it. He stated he felt there was a need for an adequate park--something that will service Anoka St., Fridley St., Arthur St., Mr. Brickner's proposed development, the undevelope� areas, the Rice Creek townhouses and some other areas. Somewhere they need some adequate space. Dr, Boudreau, the Parks & Recreation Oirector, estimated t[�at, according to national standards, about three acres would be needed to service the entire area, fridley tends to not meet national standards with most of its parks. Mr. Schneider stated that, on the other side of it, Mr. Srickner is a fantastic developer for the area, and they were very lucky that he chose to put through a proposal. He thought most people in the neighborhood would 15 F PLANNI�JG COMt1ISSI0P� MEETING, FEBRUARY 29, 1984 PAGE 7 agree that it is the kind of development the City wants. The point made about acquiring some land in the Gene-Rae Addition or somewhere else in the immediate area was an excellent idea. However, it was his understandinq that there was not a willing seller. Whatever they do, it is imperative they time it so they do not lose this whole property and then at some time in the future try to develop a park. They have to put something together with Mr. Brickner's development. He stated he would urge the Planning Cornnission to take these points into consideration. Mr. Richard Johnson, 6536 Arthur St. N.E., stated the only park they have on the south side of Rice Creek is the school property. Harris Park has a picnic table and that is no park. He stated Mr. Brickner is a good builder and a fine gentteman, but let them keep their park so their children have a place to play. Mr. Robert Thayer, 6051 - 6th St. N.E., stated he would like to see a usahle park area, but he thought the proposal made by the City had sor�e real problems. If they put in a parking lot to provide space for people driving to the park, that would be a very poor use of land. It would make more sense to situate the park so it faces onto a street so people can park on the street. Another problem with the City's proposal is it is very difficult to walk to the park without going through one or two of the little corridors they have provided. Instead, people will be walking through someone's,yard. He thought the access to the park was very poor and the park was prohably not usable to the neighb�r- hood, but only to the homes that will face onto the park. Mr. Thayer stated the idea of putting the park on the creek was ridiculous as that area is just too dangerous. He believed the school had put up a fence because of the danger to the children. He stated the value of the development certainly depended upon how attractive it is to possible home buyers. He thought Mr. 8rickner's proposal was much more attractive to home buyers; therefore, the value of the land will be higher, and the taxes to the City will be higher. This is something the Commission sho�ld also consider. MO^_'ZO': BY MS. GABEL, SECaNDED BY lfR. OQDIST, TO CLOS� THE PL�BLIC HEARI!'IG ON PS #B9-01 BY THOMAS BRICJWER. UPON A VOICE ��OTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRGIOFlAN SCHNABEL DECIJIRED THE' PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:56 P.M. Mr. Oquist stated there is a definite need to maintain a park for the neighborhood in this area. If the park is to be maintained in this area, it should be maintained as a nei hborhood park. Ne did not think it was fair that one builder had to provi e a the acreage for the park when there are adjacent properties that wi17 be developed in the future. Access to the park was an excellent point, because people will be cutting through people's yards to get to the park. He did not think the proposal by the City was a very viable proposal. He thought there were some better plans that would make better use of the land and still get a sizable park. He stated it has been pointed out that the tennis court would have to be moved 15 G PLANNIWG COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRU�RY 29, 1984 PAGE 8 anyway so that was not a factor in the consideration of where the park should be. Mr. Saba stated he wou�d like to see the City make a good attempt at obtaining some property from the Gena-Rae Addition for park land. He agreed that the total park 7and should not be the burden on one developer. He also agreed that the City did not need another .9 acre park. They needed a nice planned park. There needed to be some kind of compromise, and maybe the whole plat should be looked at in a different way with the other vacant properties in mind. Ms. Gabel stated she has had a lot of opportunites to be in this neighbor- hood and she has heard a lot of complaints about the fact that there is no city parl:. She stated this may be the City's only opportunity to do it right. If they do not get what they need for the entire neighborhood at this time, they may indeed wind up with a little piece here, a little piece there, etc., and that obviously is not what they want for this neighborhoo�.. She thou9ht they should work on trying to get something better than ��hat the City has proposed and do it right so they do not have to look back on this as another mistake like some of the other parks in the City that do not service the needs of a neighborhood. Mr. Kondrick stated he agreed with everything that has been said. He stated Mr. GricE;ner is a fine developer, t�e stated that, in addition to the 24 homes in Mr. Brickner's proposal, there are many other homes that will suffer if they make too quick a decision on this. The park use is heavy now and will get heavier as more families move into the area. He also did not like to see one developer have to take the responsibility for all the park space. He felt that something could be worked out that would he better than the proposal made by the City. Mr. Goodspeed stated he was also in favor of going back to the drawing board and trying to come up with some other alternatives. Ms. Schnabel stated each of the Planning Commission members had made a point she could concur with. As a Planning Commission member, she liked to look at things in terms of vacant land and not look at things that may influence their thinking. She stated it is not fair to expect the whole park land for this whole area to primarily come out of one plot. She felt there should be an effort made on,behalf of the City to acquire some additional property so that adequate park land can be developed for the neighborhood before a final proposal is made for this particular piece of property. She felt the Planning Comnission would be negligent of their duty to say they would take little pieces in different places. She stated that is not in tne best interest of the City. The Planning Commission would like the City to work on this again and try to come up with a more viable proposal. Mr. Brickner stated the timeframe was critical, because he wanted the plat finalized so he could build during this construction season. 15 H PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 29, 1984 _ PAGE 9 Ms. Schnabe7 stated it seemed to be the concensus of the Planning Comnission and the neighborhood that the park be on a street or have some good public access. The City's plan did not meet those needs and would not be acceptable. Mr, flora stated Staff has looked at a number of alternatives, but they are willing to work more with Mr. Brickner on other alternatives and bring something back to the next Planning Cortmission meeting. Their primary concern is that they come up with a plan that will allow for the ultimate development of all the properties. As Mr. Schneider had said, their goal is to provide a park now and not for a park that will develop in stages. Mr. Goodspeed stated there needed to be at least 2.5 acres for a park, and they needed that acreage now. He did not see where it was more fair to � take park land from two developers or all of it from one developer. It was not fair either way. They just should-do whatever needs to be done to get a decent park. . MOTION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY MS. GABEL, TO TABLE THE PUBLIC HF'AF'I'.'r O"' COfISIDERATION OF PRELIMINARI' PLAT, P.S. M84-01, CREEKRIDGE, BY TIlOK11S BRICK1IER, UNTIL THE AtARCH 19, 1989, PLAN117NG COMI�'ISSION MEETING, AT 4.filICH TIM.L' T11T. COMMZSSION G'OULD LIKE TO SEE SOl!E OTHER VIABLE SOLUTIONS FOR THF. LOCA_Tlnl� OF THE CITY PARK. UPONA VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CAAIRt•IOMA.'r' SCMJABEL DECLARED THF. MOTIC�I� CARRIED UNAIJIMDUSLY. 2. VACATION REQUEST, SAV �84-01 BY CURTIS LARSON: Vacate 67th Avenue N.E. adjacent to Lot 1, Block 2, Oak Ri ge A ition, to make a new building site at 6994 Fridley Street N.E. Mr. Flora stated this was a vacation request by �4r. Larson in order to provide about a 9,000 sq. ft. parcel of property. He stated there are currently two cul-de-sacs in the area--one on Anoka Street and one on Fridley Street. This property would abut the existing cul-de-sac on Fridley St. and the vacation of the 30 ft, platted 61th Ave. Mr. Flora stated Staff did notify all the utilities to see if there were any problems with the vacation of the street, and they received two responses. NSP has an overhead line running from the rear of the property line across tot 1 to a street light at the north side of the cul-de-sac on Fridley St. NSP is asking for a 5 ft. utility easement along the south and easterj.y property lines of Lot 1, Block 2, NSP will then mpve their line to that easement. Mr. Flora stated that on Anoka St. and Fridley St., the City has two water lines which essentially deadend at the cul-de-sacs. If the vacation is approved, Staff would like to maintain a 10 ft. easement along the southerly and westerly boundaries so the City has the option of putting in a water line from Fridley St, over to Anoka St. to provide a future loop to that system. 15 I PLANNIt�G COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 29 1984 PAGE 10 Mr. Flora stated that in reviewinq Mr. Larson's proposal as submitted, the 35 ft. setback off the cul-de-sac would require either the buildinq to be �oved back or some variance for the corner of the garage. Mr. Larson stated he is in the process of purchasing this property with the option that he will be able to build on the property. He stated it would be satisfactory with him to move the house back, but they are already only 23 ft. from the back lot line. The distance from the vacated alley to the house is 23 ft. Mr. Flora stated 28 ft, is required for a rear yard setback, so �1r. Larson would require a variance for the rear yard setback. MOTIO'1 BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY 1►�2. OPUIS^', TO RECOMI�ND TD CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VACA TION REQUEST, SAV N84-01, BY CURTIS LARSON, TO VACATE 67TH AtiB. N.E., ADJACElJT TD IAT 1, BLCCK 2, DAK RII�GE ADDITIDt�, TD MAJCE A NE�•1 BUILDING SITE AT 6994 FRIDLEY ST. N.E. , WITX THE FOLLO�ti'ItJG STIPI�r•ATIOI7S: 1. A 5 FT. UTILITY EASEMENT BE RETAINED ALONG TNE SOUTH � EAST PROPERTI' LINE OF IAT 2, BLOCK 2. 2. A 10 FT. UTILITY EASEMENT BE RETAINED ALONG THE SOUTHERi,Y' A.'�'P WESTERLY BOUNDARIES. 3. SUBJEC:' 2'O THE FtECEIPT OF TNE' SURVEI', Al.D TNAT THF. VACATEP PORTION OF 67TN BE CDA!BZNED YIITH LOT 1, BIACK 2, DAK RIDGE ADDITID."1 A?:n RECORDED �.'ITH THE COUT:T}' BY TNE LANDOt+�WER. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING Al'E, CNAIP.DIDrtAIV SCX':ABEL DECLAF.ED TNE MOTIO': CARRIED UNAIJIMOUSLY. Ms. Schnahel stated the City Council would set the public hearinq on the vacation request at their March 12th meeting. 3. RECEIVE JANUARY 24 1984 ENERGY COMMISSI�N MINUTES: MO"_'ION BY MR. SABA, SECONDED BY IYR. KONDRICY., T�0 RECEIVE TKE JA�4'. 29, 1984, EhERGY COMDlISSION MINUTES. UPON A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIP.�i�MAt7 SCNNABEL DECLAP.ED T/fE MOTIOPI CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 2 1984 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSI01� MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. GOODSPEED, SECONDED BY MR. OpUIST, TO RECEIVE THE FE'B. 2, 1984, XU ANM� RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTINC, AYE, CXAZRYIOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED TH� 1fOT�OI: CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 15 J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 29, 1984 _ PAGE 11 5. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 13, 198a, PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY NR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY �iR. GOODSPEED, T�0 RECEIVE TXE FEB. 13, 1984, PARKS 6 RECREA TION COMNISSION 1NINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCf1NABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 14, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTIOlv BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY 1�t. SABA, TD RECEIVE THE FEB. 14, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWOMAN SCXNABEL DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 21, 1984, ENVIR�NMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. NIELSON, SECONDED BY JNS. GABEL, Tl� RECEIVE TNE FEB. 71, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. Mr. Nielson stated the Environmental Quality Commission would like the Planning Cortmission to concur with a motion on page 4 of their minutes supportinq the concept of Senate File No. 1312, "A bill for an act relating to solid �laste disposal facilities, establishing funds for abatement, cleanup, closure, and postclosure care of solid waste disposal facilities, providing duties and authority to the pollution control agency, requirin� adoption of rules for closure, postclosure care, and financial responsibility for landfill operators; providing penalties; appropriating money; proposing new law coded in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 116". UPOA' A VDICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIi�+�OMA.": SCHNABEL DECLARE'D TIII' MOTIOP: CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MR. NIELSON TO CONCUR WITH THE ENVIRONM.E�:TAL QUALITY COP!":SSSIOI: A1VD TO RECOMMEND TXAT THE CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT THE CONCEPT OF SENATE FILE NO. 2312. TXE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Ms. Schna�el stated she felt it was the concensus of the Planning Commission members that they did not vote on this motion because they had just received a copy of the bill at this meeting and did not have enough knowledge to recommend a"yes" or "no" to the City Council. 15 K PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FEBRUARY 29 1984 PAGE 12 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION BY MR. SABA� SECONDED BX lNR. GOODSPEED� T1� ADJOURN TXE J�ETING. UPON 11— V� OICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRDIC�HAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE FEB. 29, I984, pLANNING COlNMISSION 1NEETING ADJOURNED AT 20:d5 P.M. Respectfully submitted, �-'-� � �- -x,�' _1-� Lynrte Saba Recording Secretary Planning Co ' o Meeting febp�ary 29, 1984 PAGE 13 � � �/ . . � `!%��rZl,v � �i'.t.�. 1'�� / �j�`� `�� . -� ' ''�-`� . . .��i ��.�- ; �•. , � . � � .: �'s . .� : �� ' ' �Y;)�� ...�v� i�� f�� G�-��- L'�c�/�s R. �'�r✓ � ��.G e�'�✓ . T� �� /1�1 �.�-t- `�'" /1 D/,�r,� i 4iQ c.i+ R f.-n� �r� o�� c.-�S �osc.�i `.�� ls. 'T�� /`��'��/ � � � ��k�� =� � x. �t � • � � J l�l�'� �'� ` ° �,G�� T,�. . �' 7�.:� s�,�� /i�ox' r e s s � Sc /� n � � afr �{/1n�� 15 L ��6� m � . , ,- � � ,�� „ (� 1 �U �rdn v�� S t, /l � . �7.�� %'�':sc•� .sl��' � . G � �o :< � � ,�l. YI � �s9 � ,�� K 6 Z y A !�''r�� `.� �J� � , , ,, , . /3 �7- Gc'4 �-� ti"L- �3yy G� /�E ti� // �� 74 /��Ss�ss.��,� sr G � .� � �,�(L s � �/C G S'3� /f'.�� 5 -"� ti � G.S yl/ _�;� �� , � /i /� `(� �� f%►: �k Si N � . (�6 �6 �fwo�N.� s� �t, 6a.s/ -6 ''� Sf, N".E /6O � � 66'� � �'� � � ls r�� CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMPIISSIOP� MEETING, FEBRUARY 14, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Gabel called the February 14, 1984, Appeals Comnission meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. ROI.L CALL: Members Present: Pat Gabel, Alex Barna, Jean �erou, Donald Betzold Members Absent: Jim Plemel Otfiers Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridley Richard Morkrid, 6461 Riverview Terrace Albin Myslajek, 6430 Riverview Terrace Stan Lueck, 6471 Riverview Terrace Edward P. Fragale, 6480 Riverview Terrace Chris Jelevarov,6477 Riverview Terrace APPROVAL OF JANUARY 31, 1984, APPEALS CONP1ISSION MINUTES: M.O:"ION BY r!R . BARNA , SECONDED BY MR . BETZOLD , TD APPP.O�'E Tf1E JAN . 31 , 19 89 , APPEALS CODIMISSIDN MINUTES AS L9P.ITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. VARIANCE REQUEST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY C�DE TO .� ��. inneso ISTI��G HOUSE INTO CODE COPIPLIAtJCE. L�CATED K1 CharCl MorKrld, b46 1 K1 vervl ew I P_rrace IV. t. , f r TO E MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. GEROU, ^_b OPEN THE PUBLIC IlEARIP,IG UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLAP.ED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:01 P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the following Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 6461 Riverview Terrace N.E. A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.073, 46, #1, requires a minimum of 10 feet between any living area and side property lines. APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 14, 1984 PAGE 2 Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 between garages a�d living areas in adjacent structures to exposure to conflagration of fire. It is also to allow for pleasing open areas around residential structures. B. STATED HARDSHIP: is r� minimum of feet reduce aesthetically "Structure is existinq incorrectly due to misinterpretation of property lines." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: The petitioner's house was 6uilt in 1977. The 1977 plot plan indicated a 25 foot setback from the north property line. In 1980, the petitioner constructed a 14 foot addition to the north end of his existing house which should have resulted in an 11 foot setback from the north line (the original plan is shown in blue on exhibit �2). The original house apparently was placed 4 or 5 feet north of the original proposed location, thus the discrepancy in the setback off the north line. This error was not apparent until Mr. Jelevarov, the owner to the north, had a land survey made of his property, A field observation prior t� the development of Mr. Jelevarov's property would have indicated the petitioner's north roperty line to be at or near the utility lines (as shown on exhibit #3�. The petitioner was also maintaining this additional triangle. The new four-plex to the north is in excess of 30 feet north of the common property line. Therefore, the distance between the structures is at least 35 feet; this exceeds the distance required between non-fire- rated walls of structures. Therefore, if the Board approves this request, the staff has no stipu- lations to recommend. Mr. Clark stated that about a year ago, this was brought to the Appeals Commission at a public hearing when they were listening to a variance for Mr. Jelevarov's 4-plex to the north. It wasn't until that time that Staff realized there was some discrepancy about the side yard setback. Since that time, it has been decided that in order to clear the item off the pend- ing roles, it should be either acted on or corrected. That is the purpose of this public hearing. He stated the Administrative Staff Report basically gave the history of what happened after the house was built in 1977. Ms. Gabel asked the petitioner, Mr. Morkrid, if he would like to make a statement. Mr. Morkrid stated that when the contractor built the house, Mr. Morkrid had assumed the contractor had found the property stakes. They couldn't find the property stakes on the south side. The contractor sodded the lot 15 0 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETI��G, FEBRUARY 14, 1984 PAGE 3 according to the power lines. When Mr. Morkrid came in for the permit for the addition, �e assumed the power lines were his property line, and then they found some other stakes 5-6 ft, to the south of the power lines and that was how the mishap occurred. Mr. Clark stated Mr. Morkrid met all code requirements in 1977 when the hnuse was originally built. When Mr. Morkrid decided to add onto the house, he merely added 14 ft. to the drawing which still should have left 11 ft. to the property line, but because the house was moved 4-5 ft. to the north by the contractor, it left only 5.8 ft. to the property line. He stated usually power lines follow lot lines. Mr. Jelevarov stated he was the owner of the property to the north, He stated �4r. Morkrid's house should be about 10 ft, from the property line, and now it is about 5 ft. He stated right now the power lines are dangerous to his property. If anything should happen and a power line should fall onto his property or the apartment porch, someone could get killed. Mr. Jelevarov stated he talked to NSP to move the power lines so they would follow along the property line. NSP said they could not move the power lines because Mr. Morkrid's house is too close to the property line, and it would be dangerous to the house. But now, it is dangerous to his property. Ms. Gabel stated that Hr. Jelevarov was aware of the location of Mr. Morkrid's house and the power lines when he came in for a variance to build his 4-plex. The position of that house has not changed. Mr. Barna stated that if Mr. Jelevarov can prove there is a safety hazard because of the power lines, he can petition P�SP and NSP will put those lines underground. That is state law. Mr. Jelevarov stated that if Mr. Morkrid's house stays where it is and something happens where the power lines fall down and someone gets killed, he wants to hold that person responsible for the damage. Mr. Barna stated all Mr. Jelevarov has to do is send a registered letter to NSP stating that as a property owner, the power line enfringes on his property and causes a safety hazard,Then there is a legal record. If any- thing happens later on, accidents, lawsuits, etc., that legal record is there that Mr. Jelevarov notified NSP. It is between Mr. Jelevarov and NSP, not Mr. Morkrid. NSP put the lines there, and Mr. Norkrid is not responsible for the location of tfiose power lines. Ms. Gabel read the following letters into the record: Letter from C. B. Joriman, Fridley Electrica7 Inspector to Darrel Clark dated Dec. 10, 1982: "I made a field check of power lines at 6471 Riverview 7errace. The National Safety Code calls for 8 tt, clearance horizontal and 8 ft. vertica7 from a 6uilding. THe lllies at t��is address seem to meet these requirements." 15 P APPEALS C0�IMISSION MEETING L FEBRUARY 13, 1984 PAGE 4 Letter from Larry Benson, Customer Service Representative, North Division, NSP, to John Flora, dated Dec. 6, 1982, re: 6471 Riverview Terrace - 4 unit townhouse": "As a result of our telep�one conversation of Dec. 3, ]982, I am writing this letter to inform you t�at Zn August of 1982, Northern States Power relocated the overhead line across the property at 6471-73-75-6477 Riverview Terrace, at t�e owner's request. The line is now located so that it does not cross over t�e porches or decks at any point. It was wit� the owner's approval that we placed the line where it is now. "If the owner wants us to move the line again, he will have to pay the full cost of the project (all labor and materials). If he wants it put underground, he would have to provide us wit� an easement across his property. If it is buried at this time of year, he would have to pay a winter construction charge of $3.00 per foot. in addition to the full cost of the project." Mr. Jelevarov stated the house is too close and if something happens and the fire truck has to go through, his fence would have to be taken down. The house should be moved, because it is too c7ose. Ms. Gabel stated tF�e Comni'ssion understood Mr� Jelevarov'•s point, hut every�- thing seems to be legal the way Zt is now. Ms. Gabel asked if tfiere were any more cor*ments ft^om the audience. Qeinq none, she stated it would be in order to close the pu[�11c hearing. MO"'IO.'V BY MS. GEROU, SECONDED BY MR. BAP1lA, TO CLOSE _�'HE PUBLIC HEAP.ING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSOPJ GABEL DECLARED THE Pi�BLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:21 P.M. Mr. Betzold stated it was absolutely unreasonable to ask Mr. Morkrid to either move his home or tear it down. The intention of the code is being met that there be a certain distance between buildings in order to prevent fire from spreading frpn one to another, In Pact, it is more than being met because of the distances between the two structures. He stated it was unfortunate that there was an error made back in 1977 that caused the house to be built 5 ft. from this location, but it has happened. The alternative that is being faced right now is of great expense and F�ardship that would be caused for absolutely no reason. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. GERDU, TD RECOMMEND � CITY COUI�CIL APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE REQUEST PIIRSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF THE PRIDLEY CITY CODE T�D REDUCE THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 10 FEET TO 5 PEET 8 INCHES TO BRING AN EXISTING HOUSE INTO CODE C01�1PLIANCE, LOCATED ON PART OF LOT 14, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 23, THE SAME BEING 6461 RIVEP.VIL'G7 TERRACE N,E. 15 � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 14, 1984 PAGE 5 Mr. Barna stated the owner of the 4-plex, Mr. Jelevarov, who is against this action, really �as not�ing to complain ahout. The incorrection of the position of the house to the lot line is through no fault of the owner, Mr. Morkrid. It was just a construction error. Ms. Gabel stated she agreed wit� the comments that have been made by both Mr. Qetzold and Mr. Barna. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSO7� GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated this item would go to City Council on March 12. ADJOUR�JMENT: MO'_"ION BY biR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. GEROU, TO ADJOURN THE MEETIP7G. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE i'EB. 14, 1984, APPF.ALS COAIMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:30 P.M. Res.�ectfully s bmitted, ,�/ �,'/ / �-!, Lynn Saba Recording Secretary 0 � .� 15 R Variance 6461 Riverview Terrace � , �� ; Chris Zelevarov '—�, �` i 64 77 Riverview Terrace � � } � Fridley, Mn. 55432 �'�'' Augus t 17, 1983 '��`�I` � City of Fridley Fridley City Hall Frfdley, Mn. 55432 Gentlemen: I am the owner of a four plex located at the above address on the cozner of Mississippi Place and Riverview Terrace in Fridley. I am writing this letter to notify the city of a huilding code violation cor►m�itted I�y my neighbor, Mr. R. J. Morkrid, located at 6461 Riverview Terrace (Lot I. D. ��2140-15-30-24-42-0011). Mr. Morkrid built an addition to his home and violated the building code ordinance requiring no structure to be built within a distance of twelve feet from the lot line dividing our adjacent properties. His addition was built just five feet fzom the lot line which is clearly in violation of this building code ordinance. I am deeply concerned about this situation because it has created problems regarding fire hazards and the location of power lines and poles which could ca��se great danger to my property. Because of the violation there are :evere hazards with the location of power lines almost direcly over r�y porch which creates a great potential for severe personal injury and property damage to me. I believe that Mr. Morkrid and the city of Fridley acted negligently by allowing this building code violation. Therefore, consider this letter as due notification that I am holding the city of Fridley and Mr. R. J. Morkrid directly liable for this situation and any potential hazards it has created. Furthermore, I would like t, pursue all legal remedies avalable to me to have Mr. Morkrid's structure altered to comply with this twelve foot building code ordinance. I will expect complete cooperation and assistance fram the city of Fridley in resolving this matter. Please contact me as soon as possible to advise me as to the course of action which must be taken. Ver trul � u , . - -- . -t Tl� �' P.� a , Y�1 c� v� Chris Zelevarov CA:jm ' � � �' T� A�. _ 1 - •.� � ;�. �,:. . - -�.,.�� C MO. E s , . � —�r . �� _ *.� � � Variance 1� . _ ; , � _ # 1 . � . 6461 Riverview � � • Terrace � � � ' � _ ' _ _ �f � , • °�• r�' �t'' �, 1/��. • A�� , r` � � y � , �� _ -- . ..� •: ' 41O • j , � � fi�� _ ! ' � ►'p r-- i AM'� .�` � •�' _ ' � ' • /_'- i� •, 1•� 1,� I�� i�' *- w 5 R � N d. � • . - �',`,, 1 .r� , 6 �'� � , �. r�� i� I . 4 ' � '�`� `` ; . . ,� . �4 l Y ,,,µ, . � i4 � �, . .. f� , • a - - =— , , :s� �`0 • I �,,�•� •�� . � . r�.....,. ,i� �• 28 �K"b ,� a 4 7H , 1 a s.'�~ . � � w ��, a i , - � � ` _ l i � � .� ; d 1' � � � �; � � � , .� t � � , i� �� N . � � � . . • ,,,, � _ : . . �� . A �,,,�' ` ` ,��, ' � +� � ` —__ -. .� : �, � _ . . w� 'A �� '`' � 4�� T� � - � ,�,� � � ��, I � � � i � R� � r l/2 , � ' ` �-�3 �� s ` 'w ♦ t �� ' � �T � .�; C � Q � � �� s4 r�1 � � �,. �� z , �s . �s s . � � � • � IS%I � `/ � ��.! , h�, .�' • � . u: .. � � r; _ _ _ �- � �b �' �r'- : �3P°. i- -S3 - - wf►Y !�' itt. � F'� o , . : '� '`_,' ' �- 1 � ! � j� ' R� . i �to � � � � . � �. 7 j 1 � ~ .. 76 , � s/ " ' / / `=�fQ J�'*'� �s f t� ; �'{ � � � . . O r� _� � i �S • • �.' � � �.. , R��r . �-.lw► wr� '� y� i . / _ �:..sd�Z"�' "�` ; j t Z � ~�, �. � . ' '� ' ' �u''�' - Y � ` 'a�tGG i5, 4 �— 2 ,� � . � " �� ` �"` � � " � 21/2 . � �. , � r ' �t 6 : � ' , 1- • �; � � �i i ��tw; � o � �o � j� ��0' -�.� .� r : 'ti /tJ 1/! ~ y�j , ..Ir. �� ' � � K � ,. , �. � � . � , , rv ,f, �, ,� � ;, ,s i�o .. . •, _ � , . r' A s '" ` �to: . �' �Z'S � ' ' � ,�s 4� �• �o ,' o�,t� .�� sQMv . � `� 1 — s2N� . . _ �o, ,, --,i ,� ,Trv �=�� ' �� VT�sE t o_e a..�-ii0� ' isb l�c �� •.,,` ��. I�S � a • ' ' r%, � ICt i/� .-.s� �t.., .. ��'i"'�"t �� . � _ � - �>,.i.�� i i� � ,� �Ji..�.:F � '� ' C � 1 /' \ m � � � �. . �" �q� ` .•' . �. Q Q.S� .. i � , . ` _ ,. , � E�c�.r, 4;r � 15 T Variance 6461 Riverview Terrace .� .-� � ,, 'C l„oT , 3 .,, .:�� I �.��' � � s� � �� n. �� _ � '' �8,�.� '�� ' -o _ ;, , : `�- .Q1 . ti � ��s� ` =.. � � , ',s�,rf'- ? :t : � � "� " �� '• . <: I �5 . 0 � ... .: 'r , ,� . �\ , ,�.�: � I -i�� ' � s. N ' T 'f . � � `� . ,. f.. �•� : � , , �,• .� i � •.� I \ OI • �� • ` �` If'� .4 �t . , \ � � -�� '; `�1�. �. G _flRl�'Ew� `'' � � ,�l • \ I �.,T 'l , � � \ . �: -_ , � � � ua� , _ _ / � Pa��o� � `�� : � - — �.E � tp� ��Z \,,/P1� �ic�-r•-� PLoT P 1..Ati1 i''= �o=o�. Cr �I Cv I RI VEEZ�'�E�✓ TERRfiG E __._ r_ 15 U CITY OF FRIDLEY ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COhMISSION �1EET I P�G FEBRUARY 21, 1984 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Svanda called the Feb. 21, 1984, Environmental Quality Commission meeting to order at 7:42 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Richard Svanda, Maynard Nielson, Bruce Peterson Mer�bers Absent: Tom Gronlund, Wayne Wellan Others Present: Bil] Deblon, Associate Planner Ed Hamernik, City Council Connie Metcalf, 860 Moore Lake Dr. APPROVAL OF JANUARY 17, 1984, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSI�N MIP�UTES: MOTION BY r1R. NIEISOII, SECONDED BY MR. PETERSON, TO APPROVE TNE JAN. 17, 1984, ENI�IRONAfENTAL pUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES AS T7RITTEN. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLAF2ED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PEPJDING LEGISLATION ON SOLID WASTE: Connie Metcalf Mr. Svanda stated Ms. Metcalf was at the meeting to talk to the Commission about some pending legislation on solid waste. Ms. Metcalf stated she had heard about this bill rather accidentially. It is Senate Bill No. 1312, "A bill for an act relating to solid waste; imposing a tax on operators of solid waste disposal facilities; establishing func!s for abatement, cleanup, closure, and postclosure care of solid waste disposal facilities; providing duties and authority to the pollution control agency; requiring adopting of rules for closure, postclosure care, and financial responsibility for landfill operators, providing penalties; appropriating money; proposing new law coded in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 116". Ms. Metcalf stated public hearings on this bill will be held�on Thurs. and �t"i'.� feb. 23-24, at 3:00 p.m, in Room 112 of the Capitol Building. After tfiat, there will be no more testimony taken and the corr�nittee will either pass or not pass it. Ms. Metcalf stated she had talked recently with A1 Kordiak about what Anoka County was doing about solid waste and where the County was on recycling. She stated Anoka County has not moved very far. The Landfill Abatement 15 V ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 21, 1984 PAGE 2 Subcommittee has kind of reprimanded those counties that have not done anything. The comment from the Subcomnittee was that the counties should be encouraging recycling and waste reduction; and, in fact, the Subcommittee felt the only way the counties would do anything was if they got some money to do it. This bill seems to be that facilitator. It was introduced in the last session in 1983 and it has been changed. Ms. Metcalf stated the main substance of the bill is that for every ton of trash dumped in the landfill, the State will collect $3, and the counties and cities also, are authorized in the bill to assess per ton. The money will go into a landfill abatement fund. It is quite specific in terms of the percentage of money that will be used for metropolitan areas and outstate areas. In Subdivision 7 entitled, "Deposit of Fees", it states: "The fees charged under this section including interest penalties shall be deposited in the state treasury and credited as follows: (1) two-thirds of the proceeds sftall be deposited in the landfill abatement fund; and (2) one-third of the proceeds shall be deposited in a landfill contingency action fund." Ms. Metcalf stated she had mixed feelings about this bill in spite of the fact that she would like to have some money to build up recycling, curbside pick-up in Fridley. This bill would probably do that. Ms. Metcalf stated some people say $3/ton is not enough. The trash haulers are opposing it because they feel they would be tax collectors. John Campion, writer for the St. Paul Pioneer Press, argued against it after talking to Barney 6eerman who is the head of the trash collectors' TNT organization, because P1r. Campion feels it is kind of a hidden tax. Mr. Svanda stated the charge on this would actually go back to the generator, the homeowner. It was his understanding that the landfill operator, in keep- ing records, would know how much solid waste was coming in and he would assume the landfill operator would actually end up paying the treasury and would collect that through the fees that are charged to the people who are dumping. So, it would work its way back into the system. It would cost homeowners something like 10�-13� per month, He understood that some money will go to the PCA and a like amount to the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Svanda stated the PCA could use the money for planning grants and grants and loans for things 7ike resource recovery projects. The same for the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council would deal with the metro- politan area, and the PCA with the outstate area. Local units of government could apply for funds; for example, the City of Fridley could perhaps qet funding to help decide what it wants to do and, once it makes that decision, to help implement that--a kind of financial incentive. Ms. Metcalf stated one trash hauler in the southern end of the state feels that $3/ton is not enough money. Not_enough money is generated and it should be more like $10/ton. 15 .•I ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 21, 1984 PAGE 3 Ms. Metcalf stated one concern she had was she did not see any concern for a fair a7location of money in terms of the metropolitan area versus the ontstate areas. Would it be possible for a large project to get the major chunk of tf�e money? Ms. Metcalf stated she felt this bill r+as of tremendous importance. She had not seen anything about it in the paper, and she felt it was being inadequately reported to tF�e peop]e. Mr. Svanda stated he tended to agree that maybe $3/ton was not enough. He stated he personally would support this bill. He felt it was a good idea, and there needs to be proqrams established that provide some kind of incentive to local units of government to plan, deve7op, and implement programs and , appreciate their need to ihitially, at least, have some start-up money to help them get going. After they get going, there will probably be some revenue generated, depending on the kinds of programs, but they have to qet away from the randomly disposing of wastes into the landfills. Another aspect of this is to just establish funding mechanisms to help address problems that are occurring right now at landfills because of water contamination. Mr. Hamernik stated he had just become aware of this bill when he read an article written by a hauler in the Elk River paper. Of course, the hauler was not in favor of the bill. Mr. Hamernik stated that if the bill is going to require the landfill operators to monitor and report and maintain this for 20 years, it is going to considerably increase the cost of dumping, Mr. Peterson stated he felt the bill was very generalized. It talks about establishing a fund, but how is that fund going to be controlled? Is it going to go to good use? There is not a lot of definition for the grants. Ms. Metcalf stated one comnent made by a hauler was that the money gotten from this will only be enough to set up the bureaucracy to manage it, and there is some truth to that statement. Mr. Peterson stated there are no goals outlined in the bill for obtaining a certain amount of resource recovery. Grants can be set up for running different projects, but what is really going to be gained in the long run? What realization for waste reduction is there going to be? If there are no goals for waste reduction, a project cou7d go on for several years but could die out unless it is really administered properly and the people are educated properiy. Ms. Metcalf stated she would like some input from the Commission, either pro or con. Mr. Peterson stated he would have no problem with supporting the basic concept of the bill. 15 X ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 21, i984 PAGE 4 MOTION BY MR. PETERSON, SECONDED BY MR. NIELSON, TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT TXE CONCEPT OF S.F. NO. I312, "A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TD SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING Fi1NDS FOR ABATE- MENT, CLEANUP� CLOSURE, AND POSTCL05URE CARE OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES; PROVIDING DUTIES AND AUTHORITI' TO THE POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY, REQUIRING ADOPTION OF RULES FOR CLOSURE, POSTCIASURE CARE, AND FINANCIAL RESPOrISIBILITY FOR ZANDFILL OPERATORSj PROVIDING PENALTIES; APPROPRIATING MONEY; PROPOSING NEW LAG1 CODED IN MINNESOTA STATUTE5, CHAPTER 116". UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON SVANDA DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Metcalf stated she would also like to ask the Comnission's help in getting the container deposit bill passed, Hopefully, this will also be passed. A vote is going to be taken on it by Senator Gene Merriam's committee, and the vote is very close. Jean Crampton, League of Women Voters, who has been working on this,has urged all in favor of it to send a letter to Senator Merriam with a copy to Senator pon Frank and/or the Governor. The Governor has indicated indifferent support. Ms, Metcalf stated the bi11 has been amended so it will charge 5� deposit on every container--plastic, neta7, all beer and carbonated beverages. There will be redemption centers that will get a 1� handling fee and the bottles and cans will be returned to a distributor. Ms. Metcalf stated this bill has been passed in 9 states, including the state of New York. She stated that if the Commission members wPre in favor of this bill, she would urge each one to write a letter stating he is in favor of the Container Deposit Qill, S,F. P�o. 741, and address'the letter to: Senator Dave Merriam Capitol Buildinq St. Paul, Mn. 55155 cc: Senator pon Frank Mr. Svanda thanked Ms. Metcalf for coming and bringing these bi]ls to the Commission's attention. 2. CONTINUED: COMPOSTING DISCUSSION Mr. Deblon stated that due to a heavy workload, he had been unab]e to contact other municipalities in the metropolitan area to see if there were other sample questionnaires or surveys that have been done regarding support or lack of support for composting. Mr. Svanda stated that since Mr. Deblon will be leaving the City on Feb. 29, and Mr. Boardman, City Planner, left the City earlier in February, he had a very serious concern about the direction of the Environmental Quality Commission and all the commissions because of the lack of staff involvement 16� CITY OF FRIDLEY CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 16, 1954 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Starwalt called the January 16, 1984, Charter Commission meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. ROLL CALL: Mer.�bers Present: Walt Starwalt, Peter Treuenfels, Susan Jackson, Irene �1aertens, aruce Nelson, Pat Kindom, Qob Peterson, Francis van Dan, Ralph Stouffer Meribers Absent: Donald Betzold, Larry Commers, Robert Schmidt, David Pinks, Bob Pierce, �largaret Hendley APPROVAL OF ��OVEMaER 17, 1983, CHARTER COM�IISSIO�� MINUTES: MO'_'ION BY PfR. STOU: FBR, SECONDED BY MR. TREUENFELS� TO APPROI�E THE NOV. 17, 1983, CHllRTER C011MISSION MINUTES AS WRITTEl7. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CNAIP,PERSON STARWALT DECL�IRED THE MOTIOIJ CARRIED UNANIM.OUSLY. 1. RECEIVE �OPIMISSION DATE SCFIEDULE FOR 1984: MD^'ION BY 11R. TREUENFELS, SECO:VDED BY MR. NELS01+, TO APPROVE THE COl�!ifISSION DATE SCNEDULE FOR 1984. UPDIV A VGICE VOTE, ALL VOTI1dG AI'E, CHAIRPERSON STARWALT DECLARED THE MOTION CAFtRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. REPORT FR0�1 COPI�4ITTEE ON SECTIOt� 4.06: ,Ms. Maertens stated that at tl�e last neeting, Mr. Starwalt had requested that she and Mr. Betzold contact the respective political parties in order to get some input from them. She statPd she had contacted a number of people within the Republican party. Most of them did not see any problem with the proposed change. The change proposed at the last meeting was that "Al1 nomination petitions shall be in'the hands of the city clerk not more than 130 (now 120) days nor less than 100 (now 90) days before the general election at which time the filings shall be closed". Ms. Maertens stated she had received two comments. One person thought the Charter Commission should be looking at the total election process and perhaps shortening it. What was meant by that was making the time from the deadline filing to the last election shorter. For example, if they closed the dead- line on Aug. 1 and had the primary in the beginning of Sept., that would give two months until the main election, so that would be a total of three months for the total election. Of course, there are pros and cons to this, 16A CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 16, 1984 ___ PAGE 2 but this was something that was suggested to her. She realized the City wanted some action from the Staff's standpoint, and she did not have a problem with that; however, if the Commission felt it was something they should discuss, she would like to see them put it back on the agenda to dis- cuss the pros and cons. Ms. Maertens stated the second comment was her own. Within the last year, this is the second time the City Staff has asked the Charter Commission on short notice to approve a change in the Charter. As long as she has been on the Charter Comnission, they have always taken a relatively long time to discuss things, and there is a reason for this. She realized these two particular things were major, but she did not like to see the precedent that whenever Staff comes in with a deadline, the Charter Commission jumps to approve things. Mr. Starwalt stated he agreed with Ms. Maertens' comnents. Mr. Peterson asked why the Commission had to take action on this item at this meeting. Mr. Hunt stated tha± it has to be passed at this meeting in order to benefit the Staff for this year's election. The �rocess is as follows: The Charter Commission approves the change at this meeting, they will review anci approve the January minutes at their February meeting. Then those minutes will be sent to the City Council. The City Council will receive the minutes in late February/early March, at which time the City Council will call a public hearing which requires two weeks notice. It takes about 10 days from the time the City Council acts to get the notice in the paper. Then, they have to have the public hearing and have to have two readings on it. Then, there is a waiting period of 90 days before the ordinance goes into effect. Mr. Peterson stated that if they didn't pass this tonight, but waited until the February meeting to take a vote on it, the Commission could expedite it directly to the City Council without shortening the deliberation time. He agreed with Ms. Maertens. He agreed with Ms. Maertens. He did not like this "hurry up" business because that is not the way the Charter Commission makes its deliberations. Mr, van Dan stated the Charter Commission is a deliberating body, and they set their own agenda. He did not believe in the "fire brigade" approach; however, their secondary task may be to attend to pressing questions that are brought to their attention. They can negotiate a study, deliberate, and come to a final resolution of that question if they can come to a con- census and oetermine in their own minds that it is the right answer. Ms. Maertens stated she understood the timeline Staff was outlining. But, sometimes, after a discussion, a Corrnnission member might think of something else that might change his/her thinking or change his/her decision. She would hope they wouldn't be making a change now, and then �wn the line find something wrong and have to change it again. � : CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 16, 1984 PAGE 3 Mr. Treuenfels stated Mr. Betzold had contacted some people from the Democratic party. Mr. Betzold had called him and told him that the people he contacted did not seem to feel this matter was very pressing and were quite willing to go ahead with moving ii to an earlier date to give staff more time to do their work. He stated there was some question as to whether they needed a filing period of 30 days, but the general feeling was that if people want a 30-day period as before, they would go along with it. Mr. Peterson stated the staff has not always done what they are supposed to do in terms of notifying and getting election judges. Staff has an obligation to go to the political parties to ask for election judges. That is state statute, and both parties have been very good about responding. When staff doesn't live up to their obligations and follow the procedure, he lost some sympathy for them. Mr. Nelson stated he tended to be in favor of taking action on the change, because there does not seem to be any negative input coming from the political parties. Mr. Peterson stated that neither party has been contacted for their official position. Ms. Maertens and Mr. Betzold have just talked to individuals of both parties, and that is not a concensus of either party and, therefore, is not an official concensus. A political party makes a decision through a formalized process. Mr. Nelson stated Mr, Peterson's point was well taken. Maybe the Commission should write a letter to both political parties asking for their official position on Section 4.06. MOTIDN BY HS. JACKSON, SECONDED BY MR. PETEP,SON, T�0 SEND LETTERS TO SBNATE DISTRSCT 51 FOR BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES, THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS, AND TNE FRIDLEY SUN, ASKING FOR OFFICIAL OPINIONS ON THE PROPOSED CNANGE TO SECTIOPJ 4,06, INCLUDING THE LENGTH OF FILING PERIQD, WITH RESPONSES BACY. TO THE CHARTER COMMISSION BY TNEIR FEB. 27, 1984, MEETING, IF POSSIBLE. Ms. Jackson stated she felt this was more important than the specific problem for Staff, and Staff will just have to deal with their problem one more year. Mr. Treuenfels stated that, legally, the Charter Commission is capable of making decisions even without the opinion of other groups, and, legally, they could move ahead on this at this meeting. He stated it was doubtful he would change his mind by waiting another five weeks for more discussion and input. He stated he was prepared to vote on the issue and would have to vote against the motion. Mr. Peterson stated that for the number of years he has been on the Charter Comnission, the Charter Corrrnission has never had 100% attendance,because the members cannot be at every meeting for various reasons. Section 4.06 was discussed at the Nov. 17th meeting, but a lot of inembers, including himself, were not at that meeting. Since his Nov. 17th minutes and agenda 16 C CHARTER COMMISSiON MEETING, JANUARY 16, 1984 _ PAGE 4 material were postmarked Jan. 13, the members who were not at that meeting himself included, had not had the opportunity of two months to think about the issue. He stated he did not think they should vote on something they have not had the opportunity to study, and he did not think that was what they have tried to do as far as the Charter Commission is concerned. Ms. Maertens stated she was in favor of the motion. She did not have a problem with changing those particular dates, but she thought there was room for broader discussion and they should not hasten the process quite so quickly. Mr, van Dan stated he also felt uneasy about moving too quickly. He stated they should take a vote only when they are absolutely sure they have a concensus. He stated they should study this and hope they can come to a concensus. UPON A VOICE VOTE, STARWALT, JACKSON, MAERTENS, NELSON, KINDOM, PETERSDN, VAN DAN, AND STOUFFER VOTING AYE, TREUENFELS VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON STARWALT DECLARED THE MOTION CARP.IED. (Mr. Stouffer left the meeting at 8:30 p.m.) 3. REPORT FROM COMMITTEE ON SECTION 5.13 AND 5.15: Ms. Jackson stated she had given the Commission members a copy of the legal definitions of "elector" prepared by Mr. Betzold and marked-up copies of the Charter showing where the terms are used. She stated the first thing they need to do is decide on the definition of terms, then go through the Charter and decide which terms they want used in each situation. Mr. Peterson asked what Ms. Jackson meant by definition of terms. Did they need more than one term or would they just be looking for one? Ms. Jackson stated there are three types of people discussed within Sections 5.13 and 5.15. There are the e� ople who have voted, and they need a term for these people. There are re istere voters. is term was used often to determine numbers; however, they o not limit political action to people who are registered. People who are eligible to vote but haven't registered still have political rights. She staied one of the things the Commission will have to decide is who can sigr� a petition for recall-- registered voters or people just eligible to vote. It seemed to her that a person who is over 18, eligible to vote, is a resident of the City and is represented by a Councilperson should be able to petition for the recall of that Councilperson. Sut, the Commission needs to identify these three groups. Mr, van Dan stated after reading the Charter, reading Ms. Jackson's initiatives, and the Nov. 17th minutes, he was dithering between two points: (1) If they consider a person who has the qualifications of the voter (U.S, citizen, resident of the City, proper age, eligibility for office), but didn't bother to register so he/she doesn't participate in political life, why should that 16 D CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 16, 1984 ___ __ PAGE 5 person add to the constituency of aiding a recall? or (2) Why should they make the recall election and circulation of petition any more difficult than it already is? Mr. Treuenfels stated that before they discuss the finer points of the Charter, he would like to return to Ms. Jackson's original suggestion that they agree on the definition of terms and then go through the Charter, deciding which of the terms are applicable to particular points. Mr. Starwalt stated he wondered if other cities have had problems with these terms . Ms. Maertens stated she felt the Commission could define the terms; it is the matter of application that is going to be difficult. Mr. Peterson stated they can determine w�o an eligible voter is simply by listing the qualifications, but what is also germain to the discussion is whether they want to include them in the Charter in any way, shape or form. Philosophically, they will have to wrestle with that problem at the same time they are defining terms. He stated maybe only people who have either voted or are registered voters can sign a petition. That would eliminate the need for a definition of eligible voter. Mr. Treuenfels stated it would be better to first define the terms even if they are never used in the Charter. Mr. Nelson stated recently moved or ing them from the process. his only concern would be for those people who have couldn't vote in the prior election fior some reason, exclud- recall process when they should be included in tha t Ms. Jackson stated the following terms are what they will be dealing with: Elector - person eligible to register to vote Registered voter - person who is on the registration roles Voter - one who has voted in the election in question Mr. van Dan stated he would contest the source for some of the definitions of "elector" iven by Mr. Betzold. (Mr. Betzold had cited court cases in other states.� He stated an "elector" is a narrower category than voter, because a voter is one who casts a ballot.. That person has not exercised election yet which is a result�of voti�g. An elector, by the fact that he/ she has voted already, has accomplished the electoral process. Mr. Peterson stated he thought it would be a good idea at this point in the discussion to ask the Chairperson and Staff to ask the Charter Commission's attorney for what are accepted legal definitions within the State of Minnesota. Mr. van Dan suggested they also consult the Secretary of State's office whose mandate right now is voter registration and definition thereof. 16 E CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 16, 1984 PAGE 6 Mr. Hunt stated this provision was not in the original Charter but was placed there by an earlier Charter Corrmission. It was also apparently based on the State Statutes, so they will have to be very Careful when revising this that it �oesn't contradict the State Statutes. Ms. Jackson stated that since it is a long time until the next meeting, she Nould like the Commission members to go through the marked-up sections, especially the places where she has put in questions, and think about who really should have the different rights. 3. APPOINT P�OMINATING COMMITTEE: The following Commission members volunteered to serve on the nominating committee: Francis van Dan, Bruce Nelson, and Pat Kindom Chairperson Starwalt appointed Mr. Nelson as chairperson and secretary of the nominating committee. AOJOURP�h1ENT: 1NOi I017 BY MR. TREUENFELS, SECONDED BY 1�42. NELSCYV , Tl7 ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIP.PERSON STARWALT DECLARED THE JANUARY 16, 1984, CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING AA70URNED AT 9:10 P.M. Respectfully s mitted, � ' i,. -, Yci ynn Saba Recording Secretary T►+� c�TV o� Fqt L Y TE � �ROM 0 DIAECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS c 'March 8, 1984 !W_ Jim Robinson - Plannin Approval of Offer to Purchase/ Statement of Just Compensation for Acquisition of Reviewview Heights 17 MEMOAANDUM .,�., :_ MEMO N0. 24-10 TO John Flora L% � �T� /��„;_ :.!i� .3 ACTIONI INFO• The City of Fridley is in the process of acquiring three homes located in the floodway and relocating the households presently living there. The structures will be cleared and the land will become a vital part of the Riverview Heights Park. The project is being funded with CDSG monies in the sum of $115,100, and LA41C0!V funds in the sum of $53,750. Presently we have completed a review of the two appraisals and have arrived at a figure we feel is equitable. As these monies need to be spent this summer, it is important that we act expediently in dealing with this lengthy process. The following is a summary of the appraisals and the City's offer. OwnerlAddress Mr & Mrs. Don Findell 7890 Broad Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Mr. & Mrs. Harry Hoch 7815 Apex Lane N.E. Fridley, Mn 55432 lst Appraisal $45 , 000 $32,500 Appraisal Review $40,000 $29,000 City's Offer $42 , 500 $30,750 Mrs. Sylvia Belisle $30,000 $27,500 $28,750 7801_ A ex Lane N. E. Frj�dl�'�,�� Mn 55432 At�this. time, staff is requesting that Council approve this offe"r so that negotiations for these properties can begin later this month. .'` _ JKR/de � r�■ c�TV o� FRI t. Y t�IRECTOFiATE OF PUBLIC WORKS OATE March 8, 1984 FROM �.P,W. John F1 or UBJECT CDGB 1984 ►,, ;, TO Nasim Oureshi, Ci �� , 18 MEMOfaANDUM ACTION INFO• X Projects for consideration by the City Council for 1984 CDBG were reviewed by the Community Oevelopment, Human Resources and Planning Commissions. The Planning Commission recommends 15% of the grant be devoted to Human Services with the remaining identified for Center City projects. (Signs, police parking structure, 4 corner plaza, street and utility improvements and landscaping.) They did not support the Joint Commission recommendations for Senior Roll-over Housing. The City is required to submit a proposed priority list to the County this month. Recommend the City Council approve a 1984 CDBG project list. JGF/ j z 18 A PLANNIIJG COMMISSIONMEETING, FEBRUARY _fts 1984 PAGE 4 4. RECEIVE MINUTES OF J4INT MEETING C►F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COP1MISSIOtJ AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION ON JANUA Y 10, 984: MOTION BY MR. OQUIST, SECQNDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECE7VE THE MINUTES OP THE JOINT 1►SEETING OF TXE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMlNISSIDN AND HU1�fA17 RESOURCES COMMISSION QN JAN. 20� 1984. This meeting was for the purpose of discussing 1984 community development block grant monies. On page 7 of the minutes, the Corrmission members present at the meeting had shown an interest in the follor�ing projects: 1. 15� to human service grants 2. Center. City projects 3. Housing rehab/energy (back-up project) 4, Single family rehab (back-up project) 5. Senior housing roll-over study Ms. Schnabel stated she did not know if any of the Commission memhers were faniliar with the senior citizen roll-over project at 23rd & Quincy St. N.E. The concept was the same as outlined by Mr. Boardman at this meeting. What happened was that after the townhouse-type units were built, two factors surfaced: (1) The units were two-story units, and many seniors are not interested in climbing stairs so the housinq that was built was inappropriate. (2) Most of the seniors simply were not interested in leaving their homes. Their homes were paid for, they ha� lived there all their lives, their friends were there, and their possessions ��ere there. Ms. Schnabel stated that, conseque�tly, the project was not successful, and it was her understanding that many of the units have not been sold, She has talked to several people in that area, and those people are not interested in this housing at all. She state�i she would hate to see the City of Fridley spend $5-7,��0 on a study, as she ciid not think it was worth that kind of money. She would rather see that �imount of money go to the people who are really poor for their specific neecis. Mr. Saba agreed. UPON A i�OICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, Cf1AIP.GI0MAP7 SCKNABEL DECLARED Tf1E MIIJi1?'ES RECEIVED. 1HOTI0IJ BY MR. r1IlJTOlI� SECONDED BY a�. SABA� TO ADOPT RECOMMENDA:"IOIiF 1-5, AS LISTE� ABOVE AND ON PAGE 7 OF T:fE COI�MUi'7I:!'Y DEV�LOPl�'I'JT CG�1PfI•�S-'�P1/ fNMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETIl7G MINUTES, AS POSSIBLE PROJECTS FOR 1984 CDBG GRANT MONIES. Mr. Saba stated he would recommencl the r.emoval of #5, senior housing roll- oyer study, Ms. Gabel stated she was not quite so sure about deleting it, because they do not have all the facts and infor�mation. Possibly, if they had a study done, they might find it was sometfing they did not want to do, but maybe tF�ere was a way to do it more succe�ssfully. . . PLANNIt�G C0�'��1ISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 8� 1984 PAGE 5 Ms. Schnabel stated she just did not want to see that kind of money spent on a study. l�lOTION TO AMEND BY MR. SABA, SECUNDED BY MR. OQUSST� Tb ADOPT RECOt1MENDATIOPIS 1- 4 AS POSSIBLE 1984 CDBG PROJEC'TS� DELETING #.5, SENIOR XOUSING ROLL-OVER STUDY: 1. 15$ TO XUMAN SERVICE GRAl1�TS 2. CENTER CITY PROJECTS 3. XOUSII7G REXAB/ENERGY (BAC'K-UP PROJECT) 4. SINGLE FAMILY REHAB (BACF:-UP PROJECT) UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRYJDMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE JANUARY 12, 1984, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AI�THORITY MIPdUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY �;R. SABA, TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 12� 1984, HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTXORITY MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIR�lOMAN SCHNABEL DECLARED THE MOTIOPI CARRIED UNANII�lOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE JANUARY l7, 1984, APPEALS C(NIMISSIOtJ MINUTES: MOTION BY MS. GABEL, SECONDED BY lNR. SABA, TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 17, 1984, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRWODIAN SCHNABEL DECLAFtED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. RECEIVE JANUARY 17, 1984, ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY C0�1P1ISSIOPJ MINUTES: MOTI�N BY MR. SVANDA, SECONDED BY.MR. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 17, 1984, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES. Mr. Svanda stated there were two motions in the minutes he would like the Planning Commission to concur with. The first motion dealt with New Chapter 109 entitled "Air Quality", a basic amendment to an existing ordinance, The Old Chapter 109 was combined with air quality and solid waste, and the basic amendment was the deletion of solid waste. What was left was quite short and was basic311y a reference to the state statutPs and rules. He had some reservatioi�s about approving it at first, wondering Nhat the value of it was, but he w�3s now convinced that by having the ordinance on the books, it put people on notice and it does give the City some authority to go beyond the general nuisance ��rovisions the City already has, He stated the Environmental Quality Commissiim recommended approval of the New Chapter 109 at their last meeting. Mr. Svanda stated the second motion dealt with a solid waste conference at the Sheraton Inn-West on Feb. 23-2��. The Comnission felt it was very important for the City to be repre�>ented at that conference, particularly 18C CITY OF FRIDLEY JOINT MEETING OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION & HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION JANUARY 10, 1984 The meetiny convened informally at 7:35 p.m. Cor.munity Development Commission: Mer�bers Present: Ken Uos, A1 Gabel Menbers Absent: LeRoy Oquist, Carol Fassett, Louis Schmidt Hunan Resources Commission: Members Present: Peter Treuenfels, B��b Minton Members Absent: Brian Goodspeed, Ma�^y van Dan, Barbara Kocher Others Present: Jerrold Boardman, C�ity Planner Bill Hunt, Administi°ative Assistant Mark Burch, Asst. P�ablic Works Director 1. 1984 COMP1UNITY DEVEtOPMENT SLOCK (�RANT MONIES: Mr. 8oardman stated that ever�� ye��r ttiey gc through the same process with Corm�unity Development Block Grant monies. It takes about six months to go through the process before tiie funds are actually available to the City. He stated Anoka County has now beE�n approved for a 3-year funding cycle with the federal government. Eacfi of the years before this, it was on a year-to-year basis, because Anoka County was on the borderline of 200,000 population. When the 1980 census came through, Anoka County was at 196,000, so they went through special legi�;lation each of the last three years to get the federal government to give Anc�ka County block grants. Now, the estimates for Anoka County are over 200,000,, so this year they are just starting on a 3-year program. Mr. Boardman stated the amount of CDBG monies has been going down yearly. They started out with $280,OOQ. Fc�r this year (1984), it is down to $128,000 for Fridley's share. They are 7oc�king at about $128,000 for each of the three years ($384,231 for three yE�ars). This-$128,000 is based on the HUD formulas for allocation of funds i:o Anoka County; it is based on poverty, housing stock, and population. Mr. Boardman stated he thought it was important to start looking at a possible three-year plan. There are going to be some projects that will be on a project-by-project basis or year-t�y-year, and they will have to look at it that way too. . � JOIPdT ��EETIfJG OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND HUP•1AN RESOURCES COMMISSION, JANUARY 10, 1984 PAGE 2 Mr. Boardman stated he went through the HUD regulations and sent out a memo to all the department heads to go through the regulations. With the feedback from the department heads and his understanding of the HUD regulations, he put �ogether a li:st of potential projects he felt would satisfy the criteria and where th��re has been an indication of some need in the past. One problem is there is really no definitive need analysis in the City as to what is needed ��r not needed, so that year after year, they end up coming up with a list of projects, prioritizing that list with recommendations to the City Council, and letting the City Council select the projects. Mr, Boardman stated they have to ��ake into consideration that these monies are not going to be around much lcm ger, and how are they going to make the most use of these funds? By far, the best way of doing it is by having programs where money is loaned oui; with a payback type of situation, so the money is continually recycled. Ttie real problem they get into with those kinds of situations is the amount of staff time that is involved with the recycling. It is far easier to gc� with a grant program. Mr. Boardman stated some of the rE�strictions they run into are with the block grant program itself. They have to show the benefit to low-and moderate income persons. Most of the time a loan program is not a workable program with low and moderate income, bec<<use by giving out loans and having those loans paid back, a lot of the peoF�le receiving the loans cannot even afford to pay back the loans on their limited income. So, the type of programs to get involved in with the payback situation is more with the economic develop- ment type of programs--those programs where you give monies to a company to get that company to locate in the community so the company can provide low and moderate income jobs. Then, there is a payback. Mr. Boardman stated Coon Rapids is working that program. They have put together several industries in which those industries are providing jobs and job opportunities ta low and moderate income people. Again, it takes a lot of work and a lot of effort to channel that money into industrial development. Coon Rapids has an Economic Development Corporation. The monies go to the corporation, and the corporation is a continuously working body in this area. Mr. Minton asked what the general purpose was for CDBG funds. Mr. Boardman stated all CDBG funds have to be used for three purposes: (1) principle benefit to low and m��derate income--generally defined as 50% benefit; (2) elimination of slum ai�d blight. All of the City's redevelopment projects fall within this category; (3) emergency. Mr. Boardr�an stated that under the regulations, HUD has increased the human service ability from 10% (last yea�^} to 15% so this should be looked at for CDBG funds. He stated that un�ier the human service grants, those funds can be used for salaries and other capitol costs for human service-type activities. 18 F JOINT MEETING OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPME�'T COMMISSION AND NU;��N RESOURCES COMMISSION, JANUARY 10, 1984 PAGE 3 Mr. Boardman stated that over the last couple of years, a few of the communities within the Technical Advisory Committee to Anoka County on block grants have been pushing for off-the-top monies for human services, county-wide, rather than having the human service organizations go from city to city seeking funding. In other words, there would be a certain percentage that would be taken off the top of the block grant before it is allocated down to the comnunities. Anoka County takes monies off the top for (1) economic deve7opment (for those things that are county-wide for promotion of econanic development}; (2) administration of all block grants; (3) housing rehab. The reason for that is because housing rehab is a need that is county-wide. Mr. Boardman stated about 60q of the communities were not interested in the program. Some of the larger communities--Coon Rapids, Fridley, and Blaine--were interested. The County does not want to do it thai way, because it does not want to get i��volved in ranking the human service requests. So, again this year, i�t will be up to the communities to decide if they want to allocate funds to human services similar to what was done last year for the 1983 funds. Mr. Boardman stated they would go through the list of potential CDBG projects item by item. 1. 15� to Human Service Grani;s -$19,211 P1r. Boardman felt it was very important to look at where the human service needs are ar�d how they can supply those needs. 2. Center City Projects a. Signs b. Fire Hall relocation c. Police parking/plaza st:ructure d. 4-corner plaza area e, road improvements f, other general landscape/ public improvements (underground power} Mr. Boardman stated one of the things the City has been committed to in the past and will continue to be committed to is the issue of redevelopment. Redevelopment is a very good area to put block grants, because it does meet a need. There has been a lot of dis- cussion in the past of why block grants are used when there are tax increments. Tax increment monies are not necessarily all of the sources of funds that are needed in this type of development. She City of Fridle.y na;� have to come.in with some dollars at some point in tirfle. 18 F JOINT �•1EETING OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ANU HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION, JANUARY 10, 1984 PAGE 4 Mr. Boardman stated any of the activities such as stop signs, public improvements, that are city improvements that are within the redevelopment district, may be a possible channeling of some CDBG monies. One thing tl�ey have looked at is some major road improvements as far as th�� Mississippi St. intersection. They are also looking at makin�� a commitment in the area for underground power. 3. Multiple Nousing rehabJen��rgy Mr. Boardman stated there is major energy legislation going on with the State Energy Agericy. If those rules or regulations go into effect, all apartmeni;s will have to meet certain standards for energy improvements withir� a year's period of time. There are some hefty penalties that go along with that. They may want to look at the possibility of providing some rehab loan monies, but, again, they have to show the benE�fit to low and moderate income and he was not sure if that justific<<tion was there or not. 4. Any project benefitting dE�signated low income neighborhoods (park project, street impr�ovements, etc.) P1r. Boardman stated there are three areas in the City that are classified as low and moderate income areas. The test of the law, 50� to low and moderate income, is there, so they could do almost any project in those three areas. 5. Architectural barrier removal (handicap trail at Nature Center) P1r. Boardman stated one of the projects suggested last year was a loan to churches and other organizations for improvements for handi- cap accessibility. The response was very negative; therefore, in order to set up that kind of program, it would take such a massive educational process they felt it was not worthwhile to go into it. They did, however, put monies into the 504 improvements that were suggested by Julee Quarve-Peterson in the study she did for the City. They are working right now on putting together a package for going out for bids for curb cuts, improvements to City Hall, and public facilities such as the liquor store. Mr. Boardman stated they are looking at the possibility of a handi- cap trail at Springbrook Nature Center. That would cost around $45-50,000. 18 G JOINT t�EETING OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENI' COMMISSION AND HUMAN RESOURCES CONQ�IISSION MEETIN(�, JANUARY 10, )984 PAGE 5 6. Single family rehab Mr. Boardman stated this is a good back-up program should another project fall through for some reason, 7. Economic development - low� interest loan program Mr. Boardman stated this is something Coon Rapids is doing. It is a very difficult project to accomplish. 8. Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) - thrift shop Mr, Boardman stated the Association at the possibility of some start-up which would provide employment for citizens to work, repair, and sell to Good Will. He thought it was a it should go as a program by itself thing under human service ��rants wa discussed. 9. Senior housing roll-Over s�tudy for Retarded Citizens is looking monies to open a thrift shop, retarded citizens and elderly items that are donated, similar very exciting program. Whether or whether it should be some- s something that needed to be Mr. Boardman stated one of the problems some of the corrmunities have had and what Fridley is also starting to have is what to do with "empty nesters". One of the ways of handling it is through "roll-over housing". The roll-over housing is essentially finding a developer who will build a condo/townhouse development-type project and will buy the elderly person's single family home, and will put that money in as �equity into the units of condo/townhouse. The developer that sells the single family to first-time home buyers who are eligible for a low-interest mortgage. The City, through the Housing & Redevelopment Authority, provides mortgage take-out money at a low interest loan for low and mpderate income first-time home buyers. I�t is a very interesting concept. Brooklyn Park has done it successfully. However, before they would want to get into any kind of progr�im, they would want to do an analysis or study on the kind of housing situation in Fridley. He thought the study would cost aroung X5,000 to $7,000. 10. Riverview Heights acquisition Mr. Boardman stated the Ci�ty Council has allocated $115,000 of the last CDBG monies for Riverview Heights acquisition. They are combining that with LAWCAIQ funds, so there is a$155,000 project and they will be acquiring three of the seven homes in that lower area south of 79th Street. That will give the City the amount of park and recreation land nE�eded to satisfy the LAWCON requirment, and it will take out the wc>rst houses in that area and provide benefit so some of the homE�owners located there. 18 H JOINT MEETING OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �OMMISSION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 10, 1984 PAGE 6 Mr. Boardman stated the following are some suggestions for projects made by John. Flora: 1. A soil investigation study in the North Area. One of the things Mr. Flora is looking for with this study is to find where the worst areas of peat are so they can analyze them as far as drainage and develop some kind of a drainage plan. 2. Senior transportation plan. Mr. Boardman stated he thought this might be something that would fa]1 under human service funding. 3. Public Works erre rgency comnunication system--a radio cormiunication system for emergencies like tornadoes, etc. Mr. Boardman stated he did not know if this was an eligible activity for CDBG funds. 4. Mississippi River Bank protection on RiVerview Terrace M►*. Treuenfels stated he had always thought of ti�: Fridley Fire Hall as being marvetousiy tocated right in the center of the community in a n�ce modern building. Why would they want to relocate? Mr. Boardman stated there is a question raised by the Fire Department about access in an out of the fire hall. With the Center City project, as they increase the density in an around City Hall, develop north of City Hall, develop across University, and put more traffic into the area, it is suggested this upsets response time for the Fire Department. One of the things they have to look at is what is the best fire hall location, given the circumstances that there is a comnitment to develop Center City. One of those alternatives may be relocating the fire hall into an area where it has better access. Mr. Boardman stated if they get involved with some of the Center City projects, they will probably want to do some kind of a three-year projection on costs. Mr, Minton stated he thought it made sense to look at a 3-year plan. Mr. Minton stated that, referring to Item #�8, the ARC thrift shop, he would not be in favor of that for CDBG monies. What they are really talking about is venture capital. The City would want them to have a business plan. If it is a good risk for ARC, there are little or no-interest loans non-profit groups can get for venture capital. He stated they should let them do it on a business basis. Mr. Boardman stated this wou7d not preclude ARC from applying for human service funding. 18 I JOINT MEETING OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION, JANUARY 10, 1984 PAGE 7 Mr. Minton stated he thought the senior housing roll-over study sounded interesting. Mr. Treuenfels stated it seemed the Commission members present at this meeting had shown an interest in the following projects: (not prioritized) 1. 2. 3. 4, 5. 15% to human service grants Center City projects Housing rehab/energy (as Single family rehab (as Senior housing roll-over a back-up project) back-up project) study Mr. Treuenfels stated he would put a high priority on the 15� going for human service grants. Mr. Minton stated that if the senior housing roll-over study could be done rather economically (between $5-10,000), he would also give that a high priority. As far as the projects within the Center City, he would go with whatever was feasible, with re`�ab as back-up projects. Mr. Treuenfels stated that as far as the underground power project in the Center City area, maybe some of the other projects should be looked at first. Mr. Boardman stated there has to be some flexibility as far as what projects are available at the time. One of the things they definitely want to start looking at, if they are going to start putting some money into the Center City project, is to put together some type of 3-year program. Mr. Minton stated if they are going to use block grant funds in the Center City project, he would like to see the maximum creative usage of the tax increment financing and maximum leverage on the part of the block grant funds. Mr. Boardman agreed. He stated they should �ook at all the items listed under the Center City project as 3-year programs. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned informally at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ynn a a / Recording Secretary T►+a c��v O� �... � v DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC WORKS �.�..-- iATE Marchr 8, 1984 R 0 �A �•P.MI• �UBJECT Highway #65 Traffic Study Nasim 19 MEMORANDUM �� __ �. MEMO N0. 84-39 � TO Oureshi. CitY Mana e ACTION{ tNFO• The City has identified $7,000 of CDBG funds to complete a traffic study for the area of Highway #65 and Old Central by the 100 Twin Drive-in property. We requested proposals and received five from local area consultants. I informed both the State and County highway departments and requested their participation in the consultant selection process. The State Aid Engineer, Mark Burch and I interviewed all of the consultants. It is our agreed opinion that SEH be awarded the traffic study for $6750. Recommend the City Council award the H�gh�day #65 Traffic Study to SEH. JGF/de �° aY _, ., 19 A F i rm SEH BRW Highway #65 Traffic Study Cos t $6,750 $7,000 Barton-Ashman $7,800 CED $6,800 Benshoot & Assoc. $6,500 RES�,iTrION IaD. - 1984 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF (70STS THEREOF: STREET PRQ7EGT NiD. ST. 1984-1 (ADDII�ID[)M �1) W�H�'�REPS, Resolution No. 23-1984 adoptec3 on the 27th day of February, 1984 by the City Council, set the date for hearings on the proposed improvements as specif ically noted in the Notioe of Hearing attached thereto for reference as Exhibit "A", and, W�iEREAS, a].1 of the property awners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of these improvenents (as noted in said notioe) were given ten (10) days notice by mail and published notice of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications of the required notioe, and the hearing was held and the property awners heard thereon at the hearing as noted in said notioe: NOW, �iERE��RE, BE IT RF50LVID by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution No. 22-1984 are hereby ordered to be effected and campleted as soon as reasonable possible, t�wit: Street Improv�nents, including grading, stablilized base, hot-mix bittaninous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sic7ewalks, storm sewer systan, and other facilities located as follaws: T.H. 47 P7est Service Drive 81st Avenue to 540' North 2. That the work to be performed under this project may be performed under one or more contracts as may be deened advisable upon receipt of bids. 3. That the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, City Hall, Fridley, Minnesota, is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare final plans and specifications for the making of such improv�nents. PASSID AiJD ADOPTID BY �IE CITY QOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY ZHIS D�AY OF . 1984. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR AZ'1'ES'P: SIDNEY C. II�II�'1AN - CITY CLERK 2/8/17/30 20 21 R��Tl'ION N0. _ - 1984 RE�Q.LTPION �Il� �7V�+JH+TP Al� APAtOVAL CF PLANS Al� ORD� ADVERTISE� FOR BID6: STREET IMPROVSMENT FROJELT I�. ST. 1984-1 (AD08i�U1l�I #1) WHIItEAS, Resolution No. 23 - 1984 adopted on the 27th day of February, 1984, by the City Council`, set the date for hearing on the proposed improvements as specifically noted in the Notiae of Hearing attached thereto for reference as Exhibits "A", and, WHERF.AS, all of the property awners whose property is liable to be assessed with the making of these improvenents (as noted in said notioe) were given ten (10) days notice by mail and published notioe of the Council Hearing through two (2) weekly publications of the required notice, and the hearing was held and the property awners heard thereon at the hearing as noted in said notice: and 4�EiEREAS, Resolution No. _- 1984 adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley ordered all of these impravements. NOW, 'IHEREFORE, BE IT RESC[,VID by the City Council of the City of Fric7ley, Anoka County, Muuiesota as follaws: 1. That the follaai.ng improvenents proposed by Council Resolution No. 22 -1984 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as soon is reasonable possible, to-wit: Street Improvements, including grading, stablilized base, hot-mix bitLUninous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm sewer systen and other facilities located as follaws: T.H. 47 West Service Drive 81st Avenue to 540' North Zi�at the work involved in said improvements as listec3 above shall hereinaf ter be included as part of: SII2E�� II�OVt�1FNP A2L1TF�(.T S`P. 1984-1 � 2 2. The plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works Director for such improvements and each of them pursuant to the Council. resolutions heretofore adopted are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. �he Public Works Director shall accorda.rigly prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper advertisements for bids upon the making of such imprav�nents Lmder such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three (3) weeks (at least 21 days) , and shall specify the work to be done and will state that bids will be opened and considered at Page 2— Resolution No. _- 1984 11:30 a.m. on the 4th day of April 1984 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and f iled with the Public Works Director anc] accompanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or oertif ied check payable to the City for f ive percent ( 5$ ) of the amount of such bid. That the advertisanent for bids for STRF�T IN�R(7VII�N'r ST. 1984-1 & 2 shall be substantially in the standard form. PASSID AND ADOPTID BY 7�iE CITY �iJNCIL OF ZHE CITY OF FRIDLEY �IIS 7�i DAY OF , 1984. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR A�i'ES'T: SIDNEY C. II�111N - CITY CLERK 2/ 8/17/31 21A � 1�. - 1984 RFSOiI.VrIOiN I!lF�OSII� IA�D LIMITS O�l P�BLIC STRSSTS � BIC�II�YS II� �E QTY � FRIII�:Y� ��°► gg IT RF5(�,VID by the Co�mcil of the City af Fridle'Y. as follvws: A. �at pursuant to Chapter 503, City Code of Fridley, Minnesota, 1978 that ooRanencing on the Sth day of March, 1984 and continuing until the 20th day of May, 1g84 ur�less sooner terminated or thereafter cnntinued, no vehicle shall be driven or operated upon any street or public highway in the City under jurisdiction of the City where the weight of such vehicle exceeds: 4 TON P£R A?��E B. The above restriction shall not apply with respect to the following nar�ed streets or public highways, to-wit: y�: �iDi� Ashton Avenue Able Stseet Alley East of Beech St. Arthur Street Baxer Street Beech Street Berne Road Brookview Drive Carrie Lane Cheri Lane Caraneroe Circle East Caacreroe Circle South CrnQneroe Circle west Cart��eroe Lane East Danube Raad East River Raad East River Raad Serv. Dr. Elm Street Fireside Drive Grirdena Avenue Glacier Lane Hillwind Road flickory Street Industrial Boulevard Industrial Boulevard Jackson Street Main Street Main Street Matterhorn Circle Monroe Street y:•� �l 79th Avenue W. Ebore Lake Dr. 78th Avenue North Danube Road 73rd Avenue 77th Avenue Windanere Drive Mississippi Street Quincy Street 53rd Avenue 73rd Avenue Ccnuneroe Circle East Ca��eroe Circle South 73rd Avenue Matterhorn Drive East Servioe Drive 58th Avenue 77th Avenue . T.H. �65 Central Avenue Matterhorn Drive Matterhorn Drive Blst Avenue 53 rd Way 51 st Way Carrie Lane Osborne Road 57th Avenue Mattertarn Drive 63rd Avenue f+i• Ironton Street Mississippi Street 79th Avenue 400 feet North Osborne Road 81st Avenue East bnd 67th Avenue Jackson Street Fil].m�re Street C��meroe Circle South Caruneroe Circle West 73rd Avenue Osborne Raad Arthur Street Slst Way to I 694 57th Avenue 79th Avenue Central Avenue East City Limits St. lrbt itz Dr ive Central Avenue 600 feet North 500 feet North 53 rd Way 58th Avenue 83rd Avenue 61st Avenue Fast 67th Avenue 22 Page 2—RE50�LUTION I�U. = 1984 North Danube Road North Znnsbruck Drive Quincy Street Rainer Pass Ranci�ers Road lmnchers Road Rice Creek Road 9t. 7mier Drive St. M�or itz Drive Trollhagen Drive Viron Road West Danube Road West Moore Lake Drive Winderiere Drive 3rd Street Sth Street 7th Street T.H. �47 E. Serv. Dri T.H. #47 E. Serv. Dri T.H. �47 E. Serv. Dri T.H. f47 W. Serv. Dri T.H. �47 W. Serv. Dri T.H. #47 W. Serv. Dri T.H. �47 W. Serv. Dri 51 st Way 53rd Avenue 53rd Avenue 57th Avenue 57th Avenue 58th Avenue blst Avenue 63rd Avenue 63rd Avenue T.H. �65 E. Serv. Dri T.H. �65 W. Serv. Dri T.H. t65 W. Serv. Dri 69th Avenue 71st Avenue 72nd Avenue 73rd Avenue 77th Avenue 78th Avenue 79th Ave�ue 81st Avenue 83rd Avenue 75th Way 75th Way Osborne Way ve ve ve ve ve ve ve ve ve ve 22 A West Danube Road Matterhorn Drive 57th Avenue Glacier Lane 77th Avenue N.E. 79th Avenue N.E. T.H. �65 Berne Road Trollhagen Drive Mattethorn Drive Osborne Road North Danube Road T.H. �65 (N.MooreLake) Trollhagen Drive 49th Avenue Mississippi Street 53rd Avenue 53 rd Avenue 57th Avenue 69th Avenue 73rd Avenue 83rd Avenue Missisippi Street Missisippi Street East River Road Main Street Ce�tral Avenue T.H. #47 7th Street Jackson Street Starlite Boulevard 7th Street T.H. i47 63rd Avenue Osborne Road 73rd Avenue Central Avenue T.H. i47 T.H. #65 Central Avenue East River Road E. Burlington No. R/W E. Burlington No. R/W 8ickory Street Main Street Osborne Raad W. Burlington No. R/W East River Road Arthtu Street East City Limits Carrie Iane South City Limits 79th Av�enue N.E. 81st Avenue N.E. Stinson South City Limits South City Limits St. Imier Drive Fireside Drive South C�1-de-sac T.H. #65 (S.MooreLake) South City Limits 53rd Avenue 64th Avenue 67th Avenue N. Approximately 500' Mississippi Street 73rd Avenue 81 st Avenue S. Approximately 600' Rioe Creek Terrace S. Approximately 800' Industrial Boulevard Central E. Approximately 300' 7th Street Quincy Street W. Moore Lake Drive W. Nbore Lake Drive Monroe Street 7th Street South End South 800' South F.�id East City Limits City Garage Central Avenue CamTreroe Lane Ranchers Road Main Street T.H. #47 T.H. #47 T.H. #47 Alden Way E. R.iver Rnad 75th Way and the weight limit with respect to such streets and highways is: 9 ZCN PER A�Q�E Page 3—RESC[,LTPION AA. = 1984 C. Notice of these restrictions shall be published and postecl with resPect to each of such streets and highways and when so published and posted, the restrictions shall be in full foroe and effect; all as prwided thereof► �der �apter 503� City Code of Fridleyr Minnesota 1976. D. A vehicle in excess of such limits may be operated or driven upon a street or public higt�way in the City without violation of law when the same is done trder Sp�ecial Permit thereof issued in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Sec. 169.67 which are adopted and made a part hereof by reference the sar�e as if fully inoorp�rated herein. E. That school bus operators are given sgecial permit to proceed with normal operation on their regularly established routes and at regularly established hours, said permits to be issued by the Public Works Director. PASSID At�ID ADOPPt� BY Z4iE CITY a7[JNCIL OF �lE CITY OF FRIDLEY ZiiIS DAY OF , 1984. WILLIAM J. I�E - MAYOR. ATI�'ST: SIDI�,'Y C. Il3�'I�1N - CITY Q.ERK 2/8/1/29 r_ : 0 , . � . , 1 �.•. 1 ��, ��`_L _ �.,t � � •j' ^'�C !TI : :I .J_ i � �- _r �� I `� �-� �., �.. � 1 �ti' ,`(� � � � a' eerr s n�r• � �� :: :•. �. .,.. _. -T- '" �% — �.,� �,�,��•�� r�! ��` � =r � � �� . 1� �� J �� • • : � ' ';`:;. "� g� I -- c::�w �� j � r� � � � �� —_ � _� a S�� n y -_ � � �� .. p ��' Y = �� ^ �� ♦ - • = � Y t � � v� � j � �� ' � � ��. � �ew �� \\ ) .` , - � • ��` ,N � 1 ,� • �'�' ' �� —r.'' (r�_�r ��i `` /�� r+1 � � � � �\\ '�\ i•4 _ � �'_fi ■ __ I. - . �1 �,V�� .y ,, i , \ .� i � � J.'� 4.� � J i 1 r , - � �:. � 1 _�` � ��'— I � � . — � I .... ', ,� � � � .� �)\ �''j�',� l �;� a'—�',+� 1l��' N I � ,ti:. -_ �� ti � - _ j ,. �L_, � ( ; � '�� ` r , � � '� ' —"'i — — _ � _ ; ,,. �. w.� -.--- ►E i -_�,�'_�i � I-- ; - — � ( � ' � I�1� l_ � - � � – � _ - �' 1 � e 5 I � , .. _ _ .�T�'• Y � �� _ 4� �� ' t �.^ � �� ,�� • � Tr_ � ^ � � . � j �_��1,��•� � � .�• � _ �.�•.•.•_"'i . �' . _ . � i_ �_ / � , �'' ,� � � ,� ••�•' ��w�� ' rV T �. . ( � 1 / 1 � '� � • � -�► : y + '��.�w � � I 'i �'� ��I•� • �rL ' t; '� r' j•� . n - �r�� .f /�`�1 ' ]! � �I Ii :_ � I' � . c- � � Y; ; .�-,�`� . — '�-J .,�� 1� �� .�.�T . �.`.i.��i �� .{ � ' �' �i: '� �_,_; T�-;''� � iC� fi — — - _ _ _ - -�, i �N�, , - � . �._� �i . _ _ -l.-��--�:�� _ _ .;�- ; � J;'-�� ;. � . �;_�� l; ; � �- �—`�� ` _ ,. _ ��_�,a �l' ' ,,!� ' � �:1 _ `� =�;, � f=�-' 7, �-.-�� ',.� , I ' i �p , r i , � . – �� Tl_ K- � � '• � i > � -� -•�;�-'�' _' � .1 . . . � � - � " , � � - �� C —,� r %'� i •�+• . � � . f ��,c) '� /� -_ = `-_ � � = -- ' i _ f� ( � .. , ::�. j � 1 �II J' : ��t.., ��•- — �� I _ �� " Ti '-� � ' i �� "� r' 't � : • � 1 —..' •��1 rS I ♦ � � � . � ,- y ',' J:I .' 1 � 1 '� � '' �� 1 , ��- .��-�1 ,� ._ : :',>. , � �`_ = ` r ;� - ,_.. . "y � � ' �^ �� ,pi'w � 1�. r,`� �` .,� •� � � ' � �'� � �— �,• ��L.:{1 4 ' _ ` . I � � — �' 7 � � • �' ' �� 1 �� ' \ r - .�. �� -�.a `1r,' •, � • 1 � ` �t � _ ; �'�� -� �_• ��' �� + , ' � �� `- '— _ .�`'��/I;. u--�j� �'#�— _ _' _'`-��3 � ' '� � ' "�,.. J� � � _ � `r � 1.� : � _ ��.r _ _. - -- . �.� � _ . ,� " �, !� � 1 ��, i -- . – � � - �' = ' 1� - .•Q .�.J�_ � d ,�- � 'r._I � . � __y�_�:._. _ — � � �� E `�- i =_ : _. : a= --- -�- -^ -- � �� j :i �'�' �" __-.. _ _= -: �= = � _ : __ . � i`,:, - --_ ___ -_�_= �° �= , � -- � -�� l� ��,-- -- -- �`- - - 4 � � ., _ �:___ : =_ . � _ � _ � :; i�T%'' `_ . � -- _ � _ i � _ _-- - • , � �:. ; t ; _= � _= �_= - _::: w r - � :�1�1' �__ = ==- - _ . -- __ . _ _ ___ __..- �, ; �_ - - -" �_= - _= - �_= - � �� .� � �_ _ \ D ,- ,1 � � � ��` =z '�: -__ ��_ : ' �:• = y - �– - �= r = ��=� � � -- , � , �'``� � -_ r _= =- � _ _- _: - - __ _- _ _ �_ - �_ ,� - �= _= - �_ -_ �_ _ �_ Y� I =- �= . -I ; -_ �=1 _ _= ==- � _ _ '� �-._ _: _ _ = - i � �-- - �== ° __ _ �_=� ._ .: '- _ �1►' � _' � _ - -- - �— �' . _ �_ � `` ,►=�---�"�� _ €.�i - � `_ �... ��. .__ � _ � � RI, r. �= - - � - - �_ ' c . �=' _ �� .. �I f •'� ,�� – s'TREET YAP–CITY OF �- __" ==� /' .,,�_ � ; FRIDLEY �_:� : =�_ : �� '�!j— � �� .4 � .�. 4.� �� s= . - _ c ' _ � . , .�'�`� .:�� .� i�.: a . •��'L .. .. :>�. :c= " 22 C 1 RF�CLVrmN ND. _ - 1984 RFSCGV�mN AP MUI�ICIPAL STATE-AID FDI�IDS '1� l�i lUNICIPAL OFP SYSl'f?! PR47BLT NAERE�S, it has been deened advisable and necessary for the City of Fridley to cunstruct a bituQninous sidewalk located south o� and adjacent to 73rd Avenue fram Central Avenue to Stinson Blvd. within the limits of said municipality, � WfiFRFAS, said construction project has been approved by the Department of Transp�rtation State P,id Off ioe and ic3entif ied in its records as S. A. P. No. 127-020-06. NOW, ZfIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVID, that we do hereby appropr iate f rom our M4micipal State-Aid Funds the s�an of 523,600 dollars to apply taward the oonstruction of said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to approve this authorization. PASSID ArID ADOF1'ID BY Zi�E CITY �I�IL OF 1I�E CITY OF FRIDLEY Zi�IS DAY OF , 1984. WILLIAM J. I�E - MAYOR -r--- f�1yM�:�t1� SIDNEY C. II�II�lAN - CITY (ZII2R ?,/8/17/6 23 � � � _ - _, MM�iH "�Nnbi 3i�u — �� i � � _ ii� � � �` QT h ��'. ��l� . y � � 2 � 1',��- j — `_ - 23 A _ — —�:-:�_-:�-- �� -- �-- ; ��- 2— �8 S � ls ► . . , ' i�� —,y,t��_�______ — {� ,� ' �` � I � �� . -, : . � �d � � ' -rs.d'd \ i `V -- �- � �v �`��1s� �� i� Oy � " {u . ;N � h� � � v� ' I ��0'�� • � � 1 ' _— L l• � � � �. n� /�ii'I s �/}��Tti � 7a ; � � -a�- `-" ---1----- � � -� � -�� , J � � .� � � -��. __ �� .. , �� i � ,: d ; i � F r � � � �; i `% , � ��`� ; � � , I � ! I i � I � � I ° i . �'' � I � �� - - -� - �a �� a � � � � I . � . ef �-�•••-� -- —: �`— 'i71 '31nI AilSY3N1fl �•- � � � 1 �:�,� � � . � � � v 0 �,� � S -r-�' i � �" ,� �e .� �� , ;� �-- � �� :i-: �T, .—�� ' ;f=_-�"_= � �_ ; ��.. �i �, : .—., � � _ 3111i — ._ -__-�i RBSOLDTION N0. - 1984 A RESOLIITION APPR09ING A SIIBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.3. #83-06, TO SPLIT LOT OFF TSE EASTBRLY 13 FEET OF LOTS 1- 15, IRVINGTOA ADDITION, ERCEPT THAT PART PLATTED AS HEATHER HII.LS, INCLUDING ADJACBNT 1/2 ALLBY, NO�W VACATBD, ALONG WITH VACATED COLFAX STREET AS PLATTED. NOW VACATED, ALONG WITH THE iIESTERLY 27.26 FEET OF LOT 10� AODITOR'S SOBDIVISION N0. 22, EXCEPT THAT PART PLATTED AS RICE CREER ESTATES 2ND ADDITION, AND EXCBPT PARCELS 1860 AKD 1870, TO MARE A NE.ii BUILDING SITE AT 1490 RICE CREER ROAD N.E. WHEREAS� The City Council approved a lot split at the February 27, 198�r meeting, and 1�iHEREAS, sueh approval �as to split off the Easterly 13 feet of Lots 1-15, Irvington Addition, exeept that part platted as Heather Hills, including adjacent.1/2 alley, now vacated, along With vacated Colfax Street, as platted� now vacated, along With the iJesterly 26.26 feet of Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, except that part platted as Rice Creek Estates 2nd Addition, and except Pareels 1860 and 1870, and WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from Allan E. Singer, and WHEREAS, such approval will make a new residential building site. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED� that the City Council directs the County of Anoka to record this lot split within six months of Lhis approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1984. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTFST : SIDNEY C. INMAN - CITY CLERK 2/8/21/15 24 �I� O I I M ' � ' � fl7 J w � 0 � i � l� M h n � � a , o �,,� � � W � � W �� Z � 0 -� � F-�1 � � � H � � � � � � w ~ r � 4 lY N O • W = � r � � � � �__,__ � � 4 � �i,- � � I .� �' � O �� a� o i ��+ ��p "� -- - • 60 - - - �� w ---; � , _ , _. __ : ' � • �C- � � � � I....1 f --j , _ � .. 'o � I � i . -.-..,`_. _ . .� . _ .. �. . _ . . . ..�_ -_ •� 24 A � �-s O � � s � � ,, a - � � �u N v w v � � � II � � � �� O � z � ' FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- APPOINTMENTS 25 MARQ� 12, 1984 STAR'PIl�G STARTII�IG I�ME P06ITI(�IJ SAI,ARY IYs►TE REPtAC�S Julie Marie Boden Folice Officer $1447 March 12, Replacement 4810 Raren Place Police Dept. per 1984 White Bear Lake, NIlV m�nth 1�J, 55110 Catherin E. Wingard P�lice Officer $1447 2509 W. Arnpur �err. NE Pelice Dept. per Mpls. , NIl� 55418 �n� R�oger J. Burgmeier Police Officer $1447 6514 81st Street S. Folice Dept. per Cottage Grove, Nll� 55016 March 12, 1984 May 21, 1984 Replacement Replacement �- 26 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- CLAIMS I �' c�.�.ir� r��.�Ers o��o? - oE�zo� ' FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CtTY COUNCIL March 12, 1984 _ Type of License: Food Establishment Fridley Bottle Shop 6289 Hwy. #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Convalescent Home 7590 Lyric Lane Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Covenant Church 6390 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Jr. High School 6100 W. Moore Lk. Dr. Fridley, f1n. 55432 Fridley Sr. High 6000 W. Moore Lk. Dr. Fridley, P�n. 55432 Grace Lutheran Church 460 - 75th Ave.N.E. Fridley, P�ln. 55432 Hayes Elem. School 615 Mississippi St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holly Center Liquor 6586 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Stevenson Elem. School 6050 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Totino's Foods 7350 Commerce Ln. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Private Pump City of Fridley 400 - llst Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Tree Removal Fridley Park & Rec. Dept. 6431 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 � Bob McQuire J. Jedleiki Les Gerdin Pat Rue Pat Rue Daniel Fleischer Pat Rue Bob McQuire Pat Rue William Spoor Pillsbury Co. Ralph Volkman Curt Dahlberg Approved By: Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector -- LICENSES Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector C.A. Boudreau Park & Rec. Dir. Fees: Exempt $45.00 Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt $45.00 Exempt Exempt 27 ' FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL March 12, 1984 Tree Removal Cont. -- LICENSES Gustafson Enterprises Inc.-Timothy L. Gustafson C.A.Boudreau 6558 Oakley Dr. Park & Rec. Dir. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Tim's Tree Serv. Inc. Tim Hagan C.A. Boudreau 7000 - 57th Ave.No. Park & Rec. Dir. Crystal, Mn. 55428 Vending Machine Anderson Truck. Serv.Inc. Coca Cola Bottling 7600 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Anoka Comm. Action Coca Cola Bottling 7i50 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Burlington Northern 80 - 44th Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Burlington Northern 4057 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Buzz's Barber 6247 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Carefree Images 244 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Central Dental Lab. Inc. 5601 - 4th St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 City of Fridley 400 - 71st Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Commerce Park Off.Bldg. 7362 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Custom Computer Systems 7250 Commerce Cir. E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Donlyn Mfg. 7331 Baker St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Coca Cola Bottling Coca Cola Bottling Coca Cola Bottling Coca Cola Bottling Coca Cola Bottling Ralph Volkman Coca Cola Bottling Coca Cola Bottling Ilomoe Hanson Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Hea.lth Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Paae $40.00 $40.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $50.00 $25.00 $25.00 �25.00 Exempt $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 27 R = FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL March 12 1984 Vendin4 Machine Cont. Fridley Assembly of God Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson 472 Osborne Rd. N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Comm. Cntr. 6085 - 7th St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Fire Dept. 6431 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Jr. High 6100 4J. Moore Lk. Dr. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Sr. High 6000 W. Moore Lk. Dr. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Coca Cola Bottling Richard Larson Coca Cola Bottling Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector -- LICENSES Fridley State Bank M. Etlicher Steven J. Olson 6315 University Ave.N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 H.B. Fuller Electro Cote Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson 5220 Main St.N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fullerton Metals Co. Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson 5170 P�1ain St.N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Gazda-Bekins Moving � Storage Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson 7580 Corrrnnnerce Ln. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Georgetown Courts Mr. Fillister Steven J. Olson 5754 E. River Rd. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Holiday Warehouse No. 250 - 57th Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 House of Lg.Sizes 6532 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Lampert Building Center 7600 Highway ;�65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Coca Cola Bottling Coca Cola Bottling Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Paqe 3 �25.00 $25.00 Exempt �25.00 $25.00 $50.00 $25.00 �25.00 $25.00 �25.00 �50.00 $25.00 $25.00 27 B 'I FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL 2 Vending Machine Cont. Larson Mfg. Coca Cola Bottling 7421 Commerce Ln. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Lynwood Manor Nursing Home Coca Cola Bottling 5700 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 P�edtronics, Inc. Canteen Co. of Mn. 6970 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Northwest Fabric Store Coca Cola Bott�ing 755 - 53rd Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Precision Sheet P1eta1 Coca Cola Bottling 5550 Main St.N.E. Fridley, P•1n. 55432 Riverside Car & Truck Wash Coca Cola Bottling 6520 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sears Roebuck & Co. Coca Cola Bottling 6199 Highway �65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Shars Snack Bar Coca Cola Bottling 5207 Central Ave.NE. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Oil Coca Cola Bottling 6071 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sinclair Station Coca Cola Bottling 6290 Highway #65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Skywood Clns. & Laund. Coca Cola Bottling 5251 Central Ave.iV.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 S& S Tool Inc. Coca Cola Bottling 7713 N.E. Beech St. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Steven J. Olson Health Inspector 27 C -- LICENSES Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Qlson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector Steven J. Olson Health Inspector $25.00 $25.00 $670.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 �25.00 $25.00 Stevenson Elem. School Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson $25.00 6080 E. River Rd. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 = FOR CONCURRENCE BY TME CITY COUNCIL March 12, 1984 Vending Machine Cont. Sunliner Motel Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson 6881 Hwy. #65 N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Sunshine Club Barbara Ridout Steven J. Olson 6431 University Ave.N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Thorne Bros. Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson Custom Rod & Tackle Health Inspector 7500 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Totino Grace High School Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson 1350 Gardenia Ave.N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Trans Cont. Tire Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson 7968 Main St.N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, �1n. 55432 Woodcrest School Coca Cola Bottling Steven J. Olson 880 Osborne Rd. Nealth Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 Food Establishment Medtronics, Inc. Canten Co. of Mn. Steven J. 01son 6970 Central Ave.N.E. Health Inspector Fridley, Mn. 55432 -- LICENSES 27 D Paqe 5 I $25.00 Exempt $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 �25.00 $45.00 ' FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL MAR['A 1 �, 1 984 Herrick & Newman, P.A. 6279 Unviversity Avenue, N.E. Fridley, NII�T 55402 For Legal services rer�dered as City Attorney for the month of February, 1984 -- ESTIMATES 0 $1,669.50 �/ ;i VIRGIL G. NERRiCK DAVID ►. NEWMAN JAMlE E. SCNMEGK►E/ER HERRICK & NEWMAN. P.A. ATTORNE�S Ar LAW - March 8, 1984 City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 February Retainer: EXPENSES ADVANCED: 130 xerox copies: BALANCE DUE: 6279 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEV, MINNESOTA 55�32 571-3950 $1650.00 19.50 $1669.50 • ,