The URL can be used to link to this page

02/23/1987 - 5050FRIOLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETIN6 PLEASE SIGN NAME ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN DATE: February 23, 1987 NAME ADDRESS � ITEM NUMBER ______________________________________________________________________________________________=� �jl� G'CC' �t /�,�C � SO/l�' ' / S f � v st e v�s o f u ' o'n_. / 6 �c� �f�/i�� %J�x��- ^, .�.G''.Q-L �i"G� // lC �v' � �' f Ci /'� �O J��% � ��f.i�.'� �7 �� -r . (� �,A G OP j1 � 4 � � =�ridl.t� � i 1 r"1 1 ��►%i��...1��:�� z��,��/% .�.� ,- ,` - 0 / r � FRIDLEY CI TY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 23, 1987 - 7: 30 P. M. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Following are the "ACTIONS TAREN" by the Administration for your information. ------------------------------------------------------------------ . , ..� s •- Volunteers of America week of March 8-14 Issued APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Council Meeting, Approved ADOPTIQN OF AGENDA: February 9, 1987 Added: 6). Discussion regarding no lef t turn sign at Aolly Shopping Center OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Bruce Nelson spoke on behalf of Parent-Teachers Association , of Stevenson Elementary School PUBLIC HEARINGS: Consideration of a Final Plat, P. S. #87-01, Longview lst Addition, Generally Located North of Interstate 694 , East of East River Road and West of the Burl ington Northern Rail road Tracks ...... Opened at 7:57 p. m. Closed at 8:10 p. m. �OMMONITY DEVELOPMENT--A�TION TAREN• Item is on next agenda for consideration . . 1 - 1 J Council Meeting, February 23, 1987 OLD BUSINESS• Consideration of Appointments to Environmental Quality, Energy, and Housing and Redevelopment Authority Commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Tabl ed CITY MANAGER--ACTION TAREN: Have put item on next agenda for consideration NEW BUSINESS• Pa ge 2 Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of February 11, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 I Received COMMDNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Filed for future reference Consideration of an item from the Appeals Commission Meeting of January 13, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 J A. Consideration of a Variance Request, VAR #86-36, to Reduce the Setback From the Street Right-of-Way Line from 100 feet to 62 Feet; to Reduce the Rear Yard Setback from 25 Feet to 20 Feet to Allow the Construction of Additional Warehouse Space on All that Part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 22, T-30, R-24, and Lots 9 and 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 78, the Same Being 5851 East River Road, by Longview Fibre Co. Approved with stipulations COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Will notifiy appropriate party of Council approval with stipulations when landscape plan is agreed on. � Council Meeting, February 23, 1987 NEW BUSINESS (Continuedl: Pa ge 3 Consideration of an item from the Appeals Commission Meeting of February 17, 1987 ......... 5- 5 E A. Consideration of a Variance Request, VAR #87-02, To Increase the Maximum Percentage of the Lot Area Allowed to be Covered by Main and Accessory Buildings from 40 Percent Maximum for a One-Story Building to 49 Percent for a One-Story Building (Previously Approved for 47 Percent), on Part of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. ?5, the Same Being 5280 Main Street N. E. , by Kurt Manufacturing Approved CQMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAREN: Notified appropriate party of Council approval Consideration of Approval of an Agreement with Anoka County for the Improvement of Mississippi/ University Avenue Intersection Project, ST. 1987-4 .... 6- 6 I PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Refer plan to County with improvements discussed, and request a hearing with affected property owners and tenants of the shopping centers Consideration of a Resolution Concerning the Rice Creek Watershed District Water Resources Management Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 L Resolution No. 19-1987 adopted PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Proceed as authorized 0 Council Meeting, February 23, 1987 Page 4 NEW BUSINESS � Continued) : Consideration of a Resolution Refusing the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's (MWCC) Service Availability Charge (SAC) Refund Program ..... 8- 8 C Resolution No. 20-1987 adopted PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Proceed as authorized Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Lot Spl it, L. S. #86-08, to Create Three Single Family Lots at 441 Hugo Street N. E. , by Division 1 Real Estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 F Resolution No. 21-1987 adopted with stipulations GQI�N�UNITY DEVELO,gMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Will correct Registered Land Survey and add additional stipulation Consideration of a Resolution Receiving the Preliminary Report and Receiving a Resolution From the Fridley HRA Reguesting the Project and Authorizing Reimbursement to the City for the Cost Of Proj ect No. ST. 1987-3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 C Tabled (as to Councilman Schneider's request to review comments of neighborhood meeting.) Scheduled March 11, 1987 PUBLIC WORRS--ACTION TAREN: Put item on March 23 agenda Consideration of a Resolution Setting the Size of the Treasurer' s Bond for the Pol ice Pension Association According to State Statute . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11 A Resolution 22-1987 adopted CENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded as authorized Council Meeting, February 23, 1987 � Page 5 NEW BUSINESS (Continued): � Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Expenditure of Funds f or the Ano ka County Mediation Proj ect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12 E Resolution 23-1987 adopted �ENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded as authorized Consideration of a Resolutionin Support of the Continued Funding of the Community Development Block Grant Program by the Congress of the United States and the Designation of Anoka County as an Entitlement County ... 13 - 13 B Resolution No. 24-1987 adopted CENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAREN: Proceeded as authorized Appointment: City Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Concurred ITY MANAGER--A�TION TAKEN: Notif ied Accounting of new employee Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Approved CEN�RA SERVICE--ACTION TAKEN: Paid Claims Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 A Approved CENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TARLEN: Issued Licenses Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Appr oved CENTRAL SERVICE--ACTION TAREN: Paid Estimates AD URN • 9: 3 5 p. m. r � FRIDLEY CI TY COUNC�L FEBRUARY 23. 1987 - 7:30 P.M. : � � : �:�►l��i# r►�M :u� �1 VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK OF MARCH 8-14 ,...� . 1 u ► � CAUNCI L M�EET I NG. FEBRUARY 9. 1987 :11• 1► 1 : ►�: � � 1 � : .11 ��1:� (CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA - 15 MINUTES) . d � ■ �► CONS i DERAT I ON OF A FI NAL PLAT, P. S. #87-01 . LONGVIEW 1ST ADDITION, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF INTERSTATE 694. EAST OF EAST RIVER ROAD AND WEST OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD TRACKS ,,...... 1- 1 � r COUNC I L N�ET I NG. FEBRUARY 23. 1987 1� 1 : ► CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS TO ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, ENERGY, ANO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT . AUTHOR I TY COMM I SS I ONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 � . � PAGE 2 RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION h�ETI NG OF FEBRUARY 11. 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 I CONSIDERATION OF AN ITEM FROM THE APPEALS COMMISSION N�ETING OF �ANUARY 13, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 � A, CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #86-36. TO REDUCE THE SETBACK FROM THE STREET RIGHT-OF-Ih�AY LINE FROM 100 FEET TO 62 FEET: TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 20 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL WAREHOUSE SPACE ON ALL THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, T-30. R-24. AND LOTS 9 ANO 10. AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 78. THE SAME BEING 5851 EAST RIVER ROAD. BY LONGVIEW FIBRE C0. COUNC I L N�ET I NG. FEBRUARY 23. 1987 : ► �► � � PA GE 3 CONSIDERATION OF AN ITEM FROM THE APPEALS COMM I SS I ON h1EET I NG OF FEBRUARY 17. 1987 ........- . 5- 5 E A. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE RE�UEST. VAR #87-02. TO 'I NCREASE THE MAX I MUM PERCENTAGE OF THE LOT AREA ALLOWED TO BE COVERED BY MAIN AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS FROM 40 PERCENT MAX I MUM FOR A ONE-STORY BU I LD I NG TO 49 PERCENT FOR A ONE-STORY BU i LD I NG ( PREV I OUSLY APPROV E D F OR 47 PE R CE NT ). ON PART OF LOi 4. AUD I TOR' S SUBDIVISION N0. 75. THE SAME BEING 5280 MAIN STREET N.E.. BY KURT MANUFACTURING CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA COUNTY FOR THE (MPROV EMENT OF 1�1{ SS I SS 1 PP { 1 UNIVERSITY AVENUE (NTERSECTION PROJECT. ST. 1987-4 .... 6- 6 I CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMEIVS PLAfV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 L COUNClL MEET! NG. FEBRUARY 23. 1987 ► � : ► •► ► � PAGE 4 CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION REFUSING THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION'S (NWCC) . SERVICE AVAILABILITY CHARGE (SAC) REFUND PROGRAM ..... 8- 8 C � CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #86-08, TO CREATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AT 441 HUGO STREET N.E.. BY OIVISION 1 REAL ESTATE ..........................9-9F CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT ANO RECEIVING A RESOLUT(ON FROM THE FRIDLEY HRA RE(1UESTING THE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CITY FOR THE COST OF PROJECT No. ST. 1987-3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 C CONSIDERATION OF A RESOL UTION SETTING THE SIZE OF THE TREASURER`S BOND FOR THE POLICE PENS(ON ASSOCIATION ACCORDING TO STATE STATUTE . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11 A COUNCIL N�ETING, FEBRUARY 23. 1987 PA GE 5 J�'EW BUSINESS (ConTiNUEO): CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS FOR THE ANOKA COUNTY , (�iEDI AT I ON PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12 E CONSIDERATION IN SUPPORT OF THE CONTINUED FUNDING OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMf NT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM BY THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE DE S I GNAT I ON OF �' :;KA COUNTY AS AN ENT I TLEMENT COUNTY .,. 13 - 13 B APP01 NTMENT : C I TY EMPLOYEE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 GLA�MS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 LICENSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 A EST I MATE S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 � �� ' • VOLUATEERS OF AI�IERICA T+�EBK March 8 - 14, 1987 VYilliam J. Nee Mayor Fridley. MN WHEREAS. The Votunteere of America, a national Christian human service organizattion. has a 91 year history of serving people in need; regardless of their race. coZor or creed; and WHEREAS, The �uord "Votunteer� in Votunteers of America, meane those rvho seZfZessly dedicate themseZvee to a mission or cause as their profes8ional and pereonat career; and WHEREAS, Ita etaff is comprised of people rvho not onZy have administrative and/or professionaZ sociat rvork expertise but rvho also have a commitment to the Christian miesion of the organization ruhich is the reaching ccnd upZifting of aZZ people. In addition to nearly 300 staff. Zast year more than 1,800 persons volunteered their taZents to heZp enrich the program services zn Minnesota; and WHEREAS, At the present time, The Volunteers of America District Office operates the foZtoruing servicee: treatment centera for emotionaZZy handicapped boys; prograras eerving auttistic, autistic-Zike and deveZopmentaZty disabted chitdren and youth; homes for eZderty and/or mentalty disturbed adutte; dining sites for eeniors in Anoka and Hennepin Counties; foster homes; men's correctional programs; and a rvomen's correctzonat facility. In addition, there are many aervices of the Volunteers in American in Minneeota not administered by the District Office. AOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, William J. Nee. Mar�or of the City of Fridtey hereby procZaim March 8- 14, 1987 ae VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK IA WITNESS WHEREOF. I have 8et my hand and caused the seat of the City of FridZey to be affixed this 23rd Dar� of February, 1987 WILLIAM J. PEE, MAYOR �'�, 'rii vi'�� vi ir�i� ��• ="'�'i"� ��' '� �mr Fv C'rrv c'c)iTN(`IL OF FEBRUARY � 1987 : �e Regular Meeting of the Fric�ey City Go�cil was called to order at 7:35 p. m. by Mayor Nee. �_ �� c+ • _ � _;��,.� I�yor Nee led the O��mcil and audienoe in the Pledge of Alleqiance to the Fl ag. �ROC��MATION • Mayor Nee issued a proclatnation proclaiming the week of �ebruary 9, 1987 as Fbreicpti Exchange Student Week in the City of Fridley in honor of two foreic� exchange studerits, Mirko Fbpovich Pittol of Venezuela and Raid Alsaid of Jordan. Mayor Nee p�esented the proclanations to these students making then honorary citizens of the City during the duration of their stay. Mr. Karl Rasnussen, Q�mnander of V. F.W. Fbst 363, on behalf of the V. F. W. and the City, preserited American anc3 Minnesota flags to the stuc3ents as a renenbranoe of their visit to the United States. Mirko stated he is fram Ver�ezuela anc7 has been in the United States for five months and naw sees the United States in a different light. He stated he enjays Minnesota, except for the oold weather, and attends Fridley High School maintaining a"B" average in his studies. Mirko stated his father is a neuro-surgeon and his mother is a pediatrician in Venezuela and he has three brothers. Raid stated he is fran Jordan and arrived in Minneso�a in July. He stated he lives in G�dar with his host fanily and likes Minnesota, except for the cold weather. Raid stated he attenc3s Totino-Grace High School and i s enjoying his senior year. He stated school is different in the United States, as studerits here are free to choose thei r classes. He stated he studied English for six years at his sc�ool as it is required. Raid stated his sister and brother were also exchange students in the United States and liked it very much so he mac3e his decision to aome to the United States as an exchange student. Mayor Nee stated he ap�reciated the work the American Field Servioe is d�ing in the studerit exchange �xogran in the interests of promoting world peace and tmcier standing. • y�:��/' • ul ►1�4 Gblmcilman Fitzpatrick stated on Page 3 regarding A1 Gabel's appointment to the Farks and Recreation CQmanission, it was his interition this term should rui for three years beginning April 1, 198'7. NDTION b� Councilman Fitzpa�rick to approve the minutes with the above c�orrection for A1 Gabel's term to begin April 1, 1987 for a three year -1- �� 1�l..��_ �� • �l�±��!4�+ �� period. Seoonded Y� Catmcilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion oarried unanimously. A�(?PP�ON OF AGEI�IDA • PDTION by Cb�mcilman Srhneider to acbF:t the agenda as presented. Seeonded by O��cilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion oarried unanimously. OPEN F�ORUM. VTSIZ'ORS• 7.here was no response fran the audienoe tmc3er this ite�n of b�usiness. OLD BUSII�SS: " � �� 'sy« �.� �_ �� i�� i i� � � �. i_a?_• I_ �_ � � : . 1 . �� i _ � , �1� �' �si� i�' � M �� i_ � � - t �� 1� s 1 1 �� • _ 4,� • •� � �!� � �s� �.� �9�L_,_Y • ;� ' • ks� ��4��.L 1+ • !�_'� �+,M ;� 4� � s � x- � •� � ; _�,�+' •� 1��_ M� �!�! _'_��: � �c La�i! �� .s_� _: . �! �� • �__ k� �� i.4 _ ,�� _� � �� 4 • • `f �� ' I i�:-� :-�� —:-� � � L�i ii � • .1 ,L� :�� NDTION tr� (b�mcilman Schrieider to waive the reading of Ordinanc�e No. 875 and acbpt the orclinanoe on seoond reading and order publication. Secanded by Cocuicilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion aarried unanimously. � •�� _�.« �� : . : a.�� * s� 4si �� i _ � � � � � � :� ' �l�,� 44_ �� « �� - � '- - �i,�i - _-�� i� ,�s • i� ��_ « � �- _ � � � �: � �,�� • � NDTION b� �imcilman Schneider to waive the reading of Ordinanoe No. 876 and acbpt the ordinanoe on seoond reading and order publication. Seoonded f�y Q�imcilman GoocZspeed. Upon a voiae vate, all voting aye, I�yor Nee declared the motion carried �manimously. c • •�� r: ►.� • �� •�� _ � 4:+ �:. !� _� +�4� !�1�L �_v_ 3t� _ �, ss ' 44- �� ' �1 �_ • - �� .�M • � . � - �_ 1�z�.M �11�i� NDTION b� C7otmcilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of Ordinance No. 877 and acbpt the ordinanoe on seoond reac3ing and order publ ication. Seoonded by Gbimcilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Nlayor Nee declared the motion wrried unanimously. �� 1� • • •,�j[,_ • 4-i '' ''' «�' 'L! L.4 !�-' • Mr. Qureshi, City N�nager, stated a question previously raised was haw the oommercial rehabilitation loans would be used. Some guidelines were prepared and explained by staff. Mayor Nee stated his feeling is these loans should not be made for properties in a redevelopnent district, as they would be eligible for -2- !i� y, _ �,�.�!��! • �%' '�� ' ' � assistanoe through the HRA's program, and felt there are needs in other ar�s for use of the a�mmerical rehabilitation loans. Gb�cilman Schneider asked who makes the decision on those eligible to reoeive a laan. Mr. R�bertson, Cbman�ity Developnent Director, stated the bank would review the desirability of the recipient for a loan and consider the risk irrvolvec3. He stated staff a�uld work with the bank in securing a loan for property awners for �articular properties the City wished impraved. Mr. Herrick, C�ty Attorn�y, stated a�rogran oould probably be establ ished where appraval of a loan is requi red both by the City and the bank. He stated in the guidelines prepared by staff �nder Section II, D-2, it states "the bank shall be responsible for laan disbursements to contractors, but r�ot before written apprwa]. tr� the City is pravided. " Ae felt even though the bank may be willing to make a loan, the C�ty oould inform then it is not on the priority list and they are rot willing to �articipate. Gbtmcilman Schneic3er askec7 if there would be an established polic.y so there is a oonsister�t way of enforcing priorities. Mr. Robertson stated staff would be working on such a�xogram for establ ishing these priorities and proaedures. l�yor Nee stated he felt the statemerit of reed was not established and asked if arryone, without referenoe to the City's goals, would be eligible to apply for these loans. Mr. Robertson stated there has to be same kind of e�dstinq blic�t, for those properties outside a HRA redevelopnent district, in order for then to apgly for these rehabil itation loans. Mayor Nee stated he felt it was easier to obtain f�nding for properties in a redevelognent di.strict than for those outside t-hese districts and would feel more o�mfortable with the oommerical rehabilitation loans limited to properties not included in redevelopnent districts. He stated he didn't have a problem with appropriating CDBG funds for the commercial rehabilitation loans, but would like a polic,y established on the fLnding and who woul d be el igi bl e. Cbimcilman Fitz�atrick stated he would prefer t�ding under the oommerical rehabilitatin loans be limited to projects where np other s�ur�oe of funding is available. Mayor Nee felt the staff's proposal for allocation of the 1987 CtiBG funds oould be approved, with the provision that the portion on commerical rehabilitation loans vould be modified, after the Council receives established policies fran staff. NDTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to ac3opt staff's proposal for the allocation of 1987 CDBG funds in the amount of $181,348, as follows: Sprinc�rook Nature aenter Restoration, $20,000; Locke House Restoration, $15,000; Riverview Aeights Aoquisition, $67,000; Seniors Program Staff Person, $5,000; Conenercial Rehabilitation Loans - Redevelopment, $32,483; Htanan Servioes, $32,954; and Anoka Cbunty Business Assist. Network, $8,911. Seoonded ix Cbtmcilman Gooc�speed. Upon a voioe vate, all vating aye, Mayor -3- �J. 6. 7. ��iZl.��. f��U... • ' �= ' !:.i� �� -- •- -• - • • r -• • i � - w . •- - • •„ •- •• . • - • • ' :' M�: •ti • s • r • �• �- • • r. • • - b ��1,._ .T, • � • _ �_� i, . �� 1• ! �`.• yI � f__ • /L_ S. ,�_.i.•! �.,�, S. � ,� f,�t � �1 !�l- � �� s li�s� � � ��f _ � ` =2.�� •�•��'n\�If__ • `T_' �S. •,l�l��. _i_ . � MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table this appointment to the E�virormerital Quality Q�mmission. Seoonded by (b�cilwanan Jorgens�n. I1pon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unani.mously. - ENERGY (J�MMISSION• NDTD�N b� Cbuncilman Goodspeed to table these two appointments to the Enerc� �xrnnission. Se�nded tr� Cb�cilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, alI vating aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion wrried iu�animously. HOUSII� & REDEVF..LOME1Vr AIT�HORITY• I�+DTION tr� Cbcmcilman Sc�neider to table this appointment to the Aousing & RedeveZognent Authority. Sea�nded by Gb�cilman Goodspeed. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, P�yor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousiy. �W BUSINESS- R.�1�7?I� TFiE M?NC?�S OF THE .gLANNING COMMISS�ON �E�FTING OF JANUARY 28. 1987 : ��,.� �� i � � i ��i_ �_ i _ � � ��i� ?11 ' � � • yi I � i - - . � s � � � �J s � . � �.�`1 � � � L i_ � __i _ i � �.� i_ � �� • _y 1 !�� 1 '� ,t __i��:_� i: �i_ ± � �'i�� • '�� t ' MJTInN tr� CoLmcilman Fitz�atrick to set the public hearing on this final plat tor F�ebruary 23, 198'7. Secnnded tr� (b�mcilman Goodspeed. t1p�n a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mation carried unanimously. Ni�TION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Planning Co�nission meeting of January 28, 1987. Se�nc3ed tr� Cbimcilman Fitzpatrick. Up�n a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried tmanimously. �f � • • . . . �,�1� � 1 l�M�1 .. • . .,� y�� Mr. F'lora, Public Works Director, stated for th broanball and open skating areas at Locke Park have norr-ea�mmically lit tr� the baseball field lic�ts. years ago, the socaer teams went to a spring and -4- e past two winters, the been i,nef f iciently and Ae also stated several sim►mer program and are � 9. �i�i1� �� i�i% � !i__i�_ � � using the eastern area of Locke Park for their activities. Mr. Flora stated a proposal was presented to the Parks and Recreation �ranission to reloc�te the existing baseball light poles at Locke Park to sup�pc�rt the ioe rink, open skating and soccer fields and to provide for future expansion for a sea�nd soccer f ield. Ae stated by util iz ing 1986 savings, the p�les can be relocated and neoessary lighting fixtures and supports purchased to properly lic�t the broanball rink, open skating area afnd orye s�cver f iel d f or approximatly $18,800. He stated f uture 1 ic,�ting of the sea�nd socoer field could be acoomplished at an approximate oost of $16,000 for lic�t fixtures. He stated the Parks and Recreation Commission appraved this Froposal and reo�m�nended implenentation of this plan. O�tmcilman Goodspeed asked. if additional lights would be located on the south side of Locke park and if it would a£fect the ryeighborhood more than the existing lights. Mr. Flora stated the neighborhood would be less affected because there would only be two, rather than three, p�les. NDTION b� Co�cilman Goodspeed to ap}xave the Locke Park 1 ighting proposal and authorize staff to advertise for the reloc�tion of poles and lighting of the Locke Fark recreational facil ities. Sea�nded tr� Gb�mcilwanan Jorgenson. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unani.mously. `• ! • • . ' ' i� LU�_:�_ '/ �� ' � �� _ �� ' s��4�.� _ ' i «�� Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated several years ago, the City purchased its first p�thole �atcher which has been very efficient and the street crews also use it for major re�airs. Ae stated this equipnent has a heating unit which allows the hot mix to be kept avernic�t and no asphalt is wasted. Mr. Flora stated another pothole Fatcfier was incluc3ed in the 1987 budget and requested the Co�mcil oonsider this resolution to advertise for bi ds. I�DZDN b� Lbuncilman Sc3uieider to acbpt Resolution No. 16-198'1. Seoondec] by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor t3ee declazed the motion �rried unanimously. _• �4l ► • " �� _ � �� ' � �� ' � ' -' ' ' 4' Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this equipnent would be used in the Parks Department and was included in the 1987 budget. He requested the Colmcil aonsider this resolution to advertise for bids. NDTION b� (b�mcilman Goodspeed to acbpt Resolution No. 17-19$7. Se�nded tr� Coi.alcilman Schneider. Upon a voioe vote, all vating aye, Nhyor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 1 • • �� ': �'i�' � �i.s ,i � _4 � � �'�! , � � _ • �.�; • •� � � �i i _� k« � •�,�i�_ �+, -5- �:�i�l.i��_ VI.1i � ' .'M1► ' 1�' '� " Mr. Bill Hcmt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated there is a plan to establish three se�erate training facilities in various parts of Minnesota and one would be located in Blaine. Ae stated this oer�ter would be used for socoer, speed skating, field hockey, and track and f ield training facil ities for the P,mnerican National team and Olympic teams. Mr. Hunt requested the �imcil oonsider this resolution in support o� such a facility to be located in Blaine. Ae stated the Northern Mayors' Association passed a similar resolution in support af the facility. I�yor Nee stated the City of Blaine has made a very heavy commitment to socoer and has built a large �mplex and this would expand thei r�manitment. NDTION b� Co�mcilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 16-1987. Seoonded b� Gbimcilman Gooclspeed. Up4n a voioe vate, all voting aye, l�yor Nee declared the mation carried unanimously. '�- � �� - 4y� � �y��- �� NDTION b� Cotmcilman Schneider to a�ncur with the follawing appointment by the City Manager : I�1NE Richard DeGarcher, Jr. 13520 Gladiola St. 1�W Arioka, NN 55304 POSITION Progran S�.iperv is�r (Exempt ) STARTIl� STARTII� SALARY DAZE REPLAGES $21,690.00 Feb. I8, �nnie Year I987 'T�cmpson Sea�nded by Gb�.mcilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion �rried unanimously. 12. �.� NDTION b� Cbuncilman Fitzpatrick to authorize payment of Qaims No. 12718 through 12957. Sea�nded by Gotmcilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the mation carrieci unanimously. 13. LICENSES• NDTmN b� �tmcilman Schneider to apprave the lioenses as submitted and as on file in the License Qerk's Offioe. Sewnded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voioe vote, all vating aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. FSPIMATES• NDTION b� Colmcilman Fitzpatrick to apprwe the estimates as su�mitted: Aerrick & Newman, P. A 6401 University Avenue N. E. Fric'�ey, 1►N 55432 -6- k�.�1�. � ,�! �+�F � � ��= ' !*s+ Fbr Serviaes Rendered as C7ty Attorriey Fbr the Nbnth of January, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,859.00 Subterranean Engineering Corp. 68'75 Hic�way 65, N. E. Minc�apol is, rT1 55432 Partial Estimate Dc�nolition & Site Grading Project #163 Lake Fbirite Cbrporate denter . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12,414.75 S�de Engineering - 9001 E. Bloanington Freeway Bloanington, M�T 55420 Partial Estimate D�nolition & Site Grading Project #163 Lake Fbinte Gbrporate �nter . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,175.20 Sec�nded tr� (b�cilman Schneider. Up�n a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. :! • 1��! � 1�TION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Gbimcilman Gooclspeed Up�n a voioe vote, all voting aye, l�yor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Gbuncil of F�ebr�zy 9, 1987 adjourned at 8:25 p�.m. Respectfully sut�►itted, (�role Haddad Willian J. Nee Secretary to the C'ity �Lmcil Mayor Appraved: 7- HJBLIC HFARING BEf�RE �lE CITY aXIN(SL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Cot,ncil of the City of Fridley in the City Hall at 6431 University Avenue Northeast on I�bnday, �bruary 23, 198'1 in the Council Chamber at 7: 30 p. m. for the purpose of : Consideration of a Final Plat, P. S. #87-01, Longview lst Addition, by Burlington Northern, being a replat of that part of Lots 9, 10 and 13, Audi tor' s Subd.iv ision No. 7 8 and tha t pa r t of the Northeast Quarter of Section 22, Zbwnship 30, Fange 24, Aroka County, Minnesota, described as follaws: Beginning at the intersection of a line �rallel with and distant 196.00 feet westerly, measured at a ric,�t angle, from the oenter line of the main track of Burlington Northern and a line parallel with and distant 878.00 feet South of the north line of the SE 1/4 of said NE 1/4; thenoe westerly, along the said 878 foot �rallel 1 ine, 554.26 feet; thenoe northerly at an angle 59 degrees 37' to last described course (measured from East to North) 325.87 feet; thence northwesterly, deflecting to the lef t 60 degrees 30' to the easterly right of way line of East River Road; thence northerly, along said right of way line, to the north line of said NE 1/4; thence easterly, along said north line, to its intersection with said 196 foot Farallel line; thence southerly, along said �rallel line, to the p�int of beginning. Except the North 155.00 feet thereof. Generally located north of Interstate 694, east of East River Road and west of the Burlington Northern rail road tracks. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an op�portunity at the above stated time and plaoe. WII�LIAM J. NEE NlAYDR I�alish: February 9, 1987 Februaiy 16, 1987 1 1A CITY OF FRIDLEY PLA��NING CO!1flISSIOfJ f1EETING. JANUARY 28, 1987 CALt TO ORUER: � Chairperson Billings called the January 28. 1937, Planni Connission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Mer�bers Present: Steve Billings, Dean Saba, onald Betaold, f4ary Schreiner — (for Dave kondrick) / f�lenbers Absent: Sue Sherek,'Rich Otfiers Present: Jin Robinson, P ning Coordinator Dennis Schnei r, City Council �la�cy Jorge on, City Council ualter Ro •enstein, Faegre b Benson R. V. � ak, Longvievr Fibre (See ttached list) APPROVAL OF JAtJIjA�Y 7, 1987, PlAr�riir�r, Cc�t►�issioN r�ir�u7ES: r 1�!D:'IOt' BY Pji�. BET20LD, SECONDED BY NR. SABA, 410 APPROVE THE JAN. 7, 1987, pLA.tiNING/EOMMISSIQN tfINUTES AS WRITTEN. �A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARF.D TNE MOTIDP: IED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PU[3LIC HEARING: COt�SIDERATION OF A PRELIItI��ARY PLAT, P.S. #�87-01 LQ!1GVIEW S ADUITIOtI, f3V QURLINfT01� NORT E.RF�: Consi eration of a Pre iminary P at, P.S. �81-01, Longview lst Addition, hy Burlington I�orthern�, being a replat of that part of Lots 9. 10, anci 13, Auditor's Subdivision Wo. 78 and that part of the Nortl�east Quarter of Section 22, Township 3�, Range 24, Anoka CouAty, Ninnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of a line parallel with and distant 19G.00 feet westerly, neasured at a right angle, fror.i the center line of the �ain track of Burlington tlorthern and a line parallel with and distant 818.00 feet South of the north line of the SE 1/4 of said '�E 1/4; thence ��esterly, along the said 378 foot parallel line, 554.26 feet; thence northerly at an angle 59 degrees 37 ft, to last described course (r�easured fron East to North) 325.87 feet; thence north��iesterly, deflecting to the left 60 degrees 3� ft. to U�e easterly right of way line of East River Road; thence r►artherly alonc� said riqht of way line, to the north line of said t�E 1/4; thence easteriy, along said north line, to its intersection with said 196 foot parallel line, to its intersection with said 196 foot parallel line; thence southerly alonq said parallel 1ine, to the point of beginning. Except the North 155.00 feet thereof. Generally located north of I-694, east of East River Road and west of the Burlington t�orthern railroad tracks. 1B PLAN��It�G CU�1��tSSION NEETItaG, JAr�UARY 28L 1987 ____ __ PAGE 2 M.OTZON BY MS. SCHREINER, SECONDED BY KR. BETZOLD� TO WAIVE TtlE FORMAL READING OF THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE AND T�D OPEN THE P:�LIC XF.ARINC. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE HOTION CARRIED UNANIMDUSLY AND TXF. PUBLIC XF.ARING OPEN AT 7t32 P.17. t1r. Robinson stated this petition was for a subdivision plat on property located on East River Road so��th of 61st 41ay. The petitio� was by Lon�view Fi bre ��hi ch crirns and ope rates a pl ant at thi s locati on. The property i n question was zoned industrial. The petition included platting for two lots. The first lot was the replattin� of existing property and also an additional five acres to the north. The second lot was for approx. 2.7 acres which wo��ld not be part of the Eongvier� Fibre plant operation or under their owner- ship, but v�ould re�ain vacant property of Burlington Northern. �1r. Robinson stated Longview Fibre's expansion plans included an addition of two phases of �•�arel►ouse. 7he fi rst phase was for 47,400 sg. ft. of ware- house to be constructeJ during 1987. Phase 2 of the plan was for 40�OJ0 sq. ft. with c�nstruction in the next year. 7ota1 site area, including the expansion of tl�e fi�ce acres, r�ould be 17.9 acres. Total b��ilding are� with the expansion would he 311,000 sq. ft.. for a total lot coverage of 39�. The addition ►��ou1J f�ave 11£i new parking stalls. With 23 existing stalls, the total parkina stalls would be 141 ►�hich would �eet code. Mr. Robinson stated it should be noted that Longview Fibre is acquiring ad�fitional properties, part of Lot 1, in order to �eet the lot coveraqe requirement of not nore than 40a lot coverage. That �rould basically be pond- in� and �reen area. Mr. Robinson stated there were variantes associated with this project. Those were reviewed by the Appeals ComMission on Jan. 13. 7he variances were for a front yard setback fron the street right-of-way line fron 100 ft. to 62 ft. and a rear yard setback fro� 25 ft. to 20 ft. Those variances were recoru�ended for approval to the City Council by the Appeals Corr�ission. �ir. Robinson stated Staff was recorriending the followinc� stipulations: 1. A park fee of 57,714 to be paid prior to recordin of plat (includes 5 acres of Lot 1 and 2.7 acres of Lot 2�. 2. A revised layout which provides for four feet of planting area on west side of new building to be provided for staff approval. � 3. A landscape plan which addresses_existing and proposed develop- ` ment to be provided for staff approval. 4. A building facade plan which provides architectural refiner�ents to north and west elevations including existinq block buildin�, ` to be provided for staff approval. 1C PLA�JP�ING COt1�1ISSI0N PIEETING JAPJUARY 28 1987 PAGE 3 5. A storm drainage plan to t�e provided for staff approval. 6. A plan to screen propane tanks r�hicl� inclucles berr.iing, screening fence, and landscaping to be provided for staff approval. 7. Itens 2-6 above to be submitted by February 9, 1987 (tvro weeks prior to Council hearing). 3. Petitioner agrees to pay costs associated with relocation of 12- inch waterline around east and north of expansion. a 20-inch line to be installed on north-south segment; city to pay for costs of added size, i.e., 20" vs. 12". Mr. Rohinson stated Longview Fibre has been very cooperative in trying to clean up the messy legal description which exists under the existing property. They have agreed to include the existing property in this plat in order to simplify tl�e legal description. Mr. Walter Rockenstein stated he v�as the attorney representing the petitioner, Longview Fibre. He stated Mr.Novak, Manager for Longviev� Fibre, was also in the auclience. tle stated the facility has been carefully thouc�ht out. They have a diagrar� showing the inside of the buildinq. The major purpose of the expansion was to add a high-speed corregatinc� Machine to the factory which manufactures paper boxes. The length of the buildinc� was dictated by the � extreme length of tl�is nachine, and the width of the building was dictated by the amount of paper that must be stored to feed the machine to create the cardboard. t+1r. Rockenstin stated the petitioner was in agreer�ent with the stipulatians. They hope to be �eeting with Staff within the next �•�eek with revised land- scapinc� and facade plans and other plans indicated so they can r�ake sure they have met the City's requirer.ients and are subr�itted in final form by the Feb. 9 deadline for City Council approval. MOTION BY �4R. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY 1'!R. SABA, TO CL0.SE TXE PURLIC NF.ARING. UPON A VOICE VOTF., ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIItPERSON BILLINGS DECLAItED THE PUBLIC HE�7RING CLOSED AT 7:38 P.N. Mr. Betzold stated he was in favor of the prelir�inary plat. He stated he thought this was a very good plan, and it was really nice to see all the goo�1 worA Longview Fibre has been doing with the City of Fridley. t�1r. Saba agreed. Mr. Sillings stated that from reading the Appeals Cor�ission minutes, a quite lengthy presentation rias made by t1r. Rockenstein regarding the need for the variances. Longvietii Fibre has apparently been a good neighbor in the City of Fridley. They needed this expansion, and he did not think it would adversely affect anything in the City. 1D PLA�v*ait�G C�'i11ISSI0t� 11EETIiJG, JAr�UARY 28, 1987 PAGE 4 MOTION BY 1HR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY KS. SCHREINER, TO RECGUfMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PRELIMII7ARY PLAT, P.S. �187-02� LONGVIEW IST ADDITZON, BY BURLINGTQN NORTNERN: BEING A REPLAT OF THAT PART Of LOTS 9, IO AND 13� AUDITOR'S SUB- DIVISION NO. 78 AND TXAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST pUARTER OF SECTION ??� TOh'l:SNIP 30� RAllGE 24� ANOlR COUNTY, MINNESOTA� DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTZON OF A LINE PARALLEL WITX AND DISTANT 196.00 FEET FI�STERLY� MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE, FROH TXE CENTER LINE OF THF, hAIN TRACK OF BURLINGTIC)N NORTHERN AND A LI1�E PARALLEL WITH A.yD DISTANT 878.00 FEET SOUTH OF TKE NORTH LIl7S OF THE SE 1/4 OF SAID NE 1/4; THENCE iIESTERLY, ALONG THF SAID F78 FOOT PARALLEL LINE, 554.26 FEETp THENCE NORTNERLY AT AN ANGIE 59 DEGREES 37' TO LAST DESCRIBEA COURSE (r�e�svrrEn FROM �AST TO NORTX) 375.87 FEET; TH6NCE NORTNA'ESTERLY, DEFLECTING T�D TNB LEFT 60 DEGREES 30' T�O THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINF OF E1LST RIVER RDADj THENCE NORTXERLY� ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, TO THF NORTH LINE OF SAID NE 1/4 j TXEIJCF. EASTERLY� ALONG SAID NORTH LINB, TO ITS Il7TERSEC- TION fJITH SAID.196 FOOT PARALLF:L LINE; THL`�NCE SOUTNERLY, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, TO TNE POINT OF BEGINNINC. F.XCEPT TXE NORTX 155.00 FEET THEREOF. GEtJER�1LLX LOCATED NORTK OF I-694, EAST OF EAST RIVER RDAD AND WEST OF THE BURLINGTON NORTNERN RAILROAD TRACKS, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCES AND S(lBJECT TO TXE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONSs 1. A PARK FEE OF 57,7I4 � BE PAID PRIOR TO RECORDING OF PLAT (INCLUDES FIVE ACRES OF LOT 1 AND ?.7 ACRES OF LOT ?). 2. A REVISED LAYOUT WftICN PROVIDES FOR FOUR FEET OF PLT.NTING AREA ON WEST SIDE OF NEW BUILDING TO BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF APPROVAL. 3. A I.�INDSCAPE PI.AN NHICX AADRESSES EXIS.TING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TD 8E PROVIDED FOR STAFF APPROVAL. 4. A BUILDING FACADE PLA.N �INICX PROVIDES ARCNITECTURAL REFIN�MF:NTS TO NORTN AND WEST ELEVATIONS INCLUDING EXISTING BLOCK BUILDINf, TO BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF APPROVAL. 5. A STORM DRAINAGE PLAN TO BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF APPROVAL. 6. A PLAN TO SCREEN PROPA'VE T.r+NKS iIHICH II�CLUAF.S BER":ING, SCRFENIPTG FF.NCE, AND LAIVDSCAPING TO BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF APPROVAL. 7. ITEttiS 2-6 I,AOVE TO BE SUBMITTED DY FEB. 9, 1987 (ZWO WEEKS PRIOR TO COUNCIL XEAIZING) . 8. PETITIONER AGREES TO PAY COS1"S ASSOCIATED WITi1 RELOCATION OF 12-INCf! WATERLINE AROUND EAST AND NORTH OF EXPANSION. A 20-INCH LINE TO BE INSTALLED ON NORTH-SOUTH SEGIlENTj CITY TO PAY FbR COSTS OF ADDED SIZE, I.E.. 20" vs. 22". . UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON sILLINGS DECLIiRED T.HF. MOTION CARRIED UNANIHOGLSLY. 2. PUDLIC HEARIt�G: CO�JSIDERATIOt� 0� A SPECIAL USE PERt�J,T,/�P #�6-17, HY CHl1RCH Oi� TNE �IOVE: - er Section 05.0 .1, C, 2, of the fridl y Code for church purposes ' including the use of the existing sium for church services and the construction of a 120-car par ' ot, all located in Section Z4, 7-30, R-24, Anoka County, I'linnesota ot 4, Meloland Gardens, located in Section 24, T-30, R-24, AnoHa y, �iinnesota, and Lot 5, except for the 1•Jesterly 110 � feet of the 5 erly 200 feet, Neloland Gardens, located in Section 24, T-30, R- , noka County, ttinnesota, and Lot 1, except for the Southerly 21 t, tteloland Gardens, located in Secti�n 24, T-3A, R-24, Anoka County. . • •- I . � ( I —�— 20 ' - . . ..- sJ�.v ✓ ir- _ .te . -S I � / RT LCUIS STEVENSON .EMENTARY SCHOOL .�. � �, ��..1 —'�► �--------- �r � .�r : � , R08YN'S � � RivER . ` �- , V {' � c , � �� . �O • • ''4' . rF�4 '' I .4 t t4�ti / �� vo. 3� ; ; �' �:��i .-i/ - ,.;� � •� �. � •♦ ); • IA 87-01 r��sy ew lst �ddition �- � . 8 G. N .P i; �. �s . �.,R�- . -�t.. 4 G -+� v �i ,; � , -wn uM�, t1 . � - r_+ � � �...' !r r�i.s� . -;.: ;�� sf.sy /- o%.neis , t . 5..4. , � � r.Ii�s S S�'1 �) . . �s_ �/ . �> 4 G N .v�vx C 6. 9.! AC 3 ATION...�t"A1P . �� f.n . / � o, i. 1F .:.rn .nt :. tna 4L. i . �Jr...�, .w+ k�, �i. :�1 . � _ ,_ ___ _ _ _ _ � ,%R�' l.n��lr�:l�4'� �°�r �r- � i o f � �� ►� 3��0� �� ' ' ,! ;-^CVI��'�l 1 �'� ��l TION ,. �- - - - _ _-- , _C' �. , � ' for i � � , :,:;1'C•b;Fµ' F'b4i .''..^MPA�'YY � � ;.^'=! c,1','T i �E� .Z� I , FR�Di6Y, ,�fl,1�N. ;^;+�32 O ,� � I . ,.c, a i Q ' � � ' � . ,� 1 `� .� '. -- -___ 1 r�y,CR�P'nc�v � , ,. " ' . . .. ._ ._ - -- ;. .,,,,.,�•. , ... .. ., -..... N. :, �.' ' .� .� �.� .. �.� :� <..a : ..._,.,. ��. � .Y . . ,. .. . .... �. .. � . , . . . � .., i 1.•J �. .. . � . . ^ ' .. . � . . .i � �nJ J �� f . � _, . , � . �% . . ' . . � .I(.1 I . . . .. 11, �. � j . ..., ,. . .. . . , c�t ,.� ... . . .�, „�,... ��` � I i i',� ..i�..ii .. • `'.a. . ,� �.,�� \ � � . iJ�.i .� ,�.� � , � . '\ ., � ..' . ,. _ i ' .� .-, �, �� . • . � � �� . . 1� � � � i _ .. __ � , , ,� - y ONI � M-2 H�1vY �r�A��RIAL �� _i��r , � �� I � ,' :,�� < ^r--.:�,� � � �� 1 `"''. �., _ , ,'��r -_—� , 3�� r�\`?;,'-',,�� t �' � � . : �_ - , � :� o . ,�A - ��:� .-.-.-.::.:'- � , - o� ; � � 'm ��l�I �� , p � 'r I � _ _ � S_ . ,-' i � � J ,� . ' ,..:: _: � g � � , � �--- N i i a l , A � ( _ __ 3/ �- — — ; � , - --- - � ,� --_, , _ : � I41` i � . . . . � y � ' � ' � ' . ,� . . . � . ..� • c� . . '• �.. •. ... .:'. . .� . '� � ^, � � ' ' . ' � Y b_� � `� , i G�. � ' y � . . _ . I f��'y ' I l�6y �� c.f �lu� �.► � o..r�d by '1`� �,— I a ► . °" ""�',L�% � �� I� � %. � af'J� �5�4rfi�q!' Mu„r+a✓a �ii(v� L'"AGy o/ � .��r �'. _.� � �i�,�yr�.a► i I ' � r ' I � � —'—L , WcRn( 'M.�n wrtN r�N. irv. . ___ _.�.�_ ._ .' __ n�, —+—+ �x.��;►A�( !sxL� wr1M :•arMxt rj' i . __–.. - _ .. _ o �iG.^t�.t ^r..ss, w+'.H ckYt.! A�n, �v � .� Y '.t .r rr_ .. r , � • .. .. . . � . . r ._ '_.a .v .t: :. ��- iI�AM ll�r ; �9�� •"za �� i��. '� � > ��:� � � � �;tt :� �� i:c � � � # � � !tF +�� - f � i' I �. Sx � : �� I� � ;� � I - " � _. .,� ' r �� ; R i--� =� � ,�� ` /' ,,r % � / / , i // /.� � � . � �\ �.. ...�.��. �' �; ��: .. .�.s.u��-oi 1 G �.�oncvie�a lst �d. � I ' . � t ; I � I , �i , � /! :. � � -( �=- _ ------ - i� � �4 ; �---i---- _ {�"--� — — _. � � ✓ �� ww �-----� �t .'° �'� .. _ fI ., _ ��cl�ll`,�111�'iiii'i.�J j. � ---=---------- , � ;� I � 1 , L � � � �� , � , ,. ,: ; ._ a � � . , ... . , L I � �� X � � } SITE MAP � . . � �.: : . : . - . — . - .�.::..--- � . , __ . _ '_- .___ --�`--- - . . : , `�f . �. .�� _____- -- --- --- , � � ' � , ,�� . , . . , . - '!� . "•'�" �i _ t 1. � � . �'} 1 . ' 1 _Z�i:. �_ � � r� ' � �� G �, �. � _. . ' • Y � 2 �rVrr�r-- �-f =—�� = � i' � ^ _ � � l�; +I ..1, � i �� r` �.'_' ` - " ; � j . � � � .� _. . � � .� �� ! �� , , . , _ t,-� �� 4 � . �. . . `y�+ ; ' � , j � � � _ �� ; � : •.1�' •r�: . � � . . '� I � . �. . _ �� .r - � t .��' � . ' � � �. . i ! ;� . ; ��_� � � ' , r _—_ � _ � ..� i T.r. � . ' l. , � i I / 1� � . � � � t}!�Y 'Y^�'� � � � � �f =.. ! t W � � �:.\:r J� ' I �A � T �� ' I ��--� � � � ' . � ? � � , �. �� - i � ��i��l � 1 i �- i� I � '`/ � i i,' � � ' I . ,� � r � I' � �� d �'��--- -- .—�1 ; � �: -� — � Li ;�� e� CJ ~� Fx, . j� � s- ;t'I � .. ��• Y � � �� ^r.� .\r� .r. � O J � � � i d � --- '' - -- - � --� . _ ; - -, . ' . . �.. � =. .� � . . . � : � �� 'i! I � , ,� ,� � �`��. � r. � I�� 1 , � �-- � ------- � .. i , � � ; ' .�� .. _ ; i Y' {i � '�' `— � � � r � ;. �: �� _ 1 • + -r O � .. �.. 1H ; ' ' ; cT` : , • . I .. • / .; + �. �� • � � .. � �' ' . -, �� : ..�,� .. • j � LANDS.CAPE PLAN �;.: � �;: �� 3 � �: � f� �_:, � ..�Y •� _ '; �3 :' ; ;:: �� ' t 2�t ;3 � ��_ :� °' � ° "�` � _ �e � _: �___. , __ _ �— ��_ i- -. � ' ;I � . . � �. ; !'� ' �; � � �� i '... , :J I ' ,,_� �� I f Q � , ^) z� i• v �I �� I __ L .r_.. � � � � � iO C�. .. .'i., � � � .�;� ; : ��. � `�-` � � � ; � o � ;-- i �- ;C i I I � ' � — ,� ,� � e� � � �� i ' I � � � ,' ' � i °, �o � �I � �' �, -� �' ��. i � j ( !I - � ► ' �� ► _ _. �Y -T�— � � I I I � r.` I _��; �� -- T-1 � I I ` � � ~ `e II o i7 ; �� i i � , �� , ' �3 i ;�_i � I �f I � .1 ;�. ., ::_ � � � �� .� � �� - � � - w � a� �� 11 FACADE PAINTING PLAN L(�V I tW 15 I ADU ( I I UV f'. S, �(-!O1 �If i�_I_1�I1.�1�.+� 1. A F'ARK rEE OF �(. � 14 TO BE PAI D PR I OR TO RECORD I NG OF F'LAT: I NCLUDES 5 ACRES OF LUT 1 AND �.( ACRES OF LOT �. L. A REVISED LAYOUT WHICH PROVIDES FOR FOUR FEET OF PLANTING AREA ON WEST SIDE OF I�W BUILDING TO BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF APPROVAL (SUBMITTED FOR STAFF APPROVAL ON t'EBRUARY 4. 1`�8(). j. A LANDSCAPE PLAN WHICH ADDRESSES EXISTING AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF APPROVAL (SI�ITTED FOR (:OUNCIL REVIEW). 4, A BUILDING FACADE PLAN WHICH PROVIDES ARCHITECTURAL REFINENIENTS TO N�tTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS INCLUDING EXISTING BLOCK BUILDING. TO BE PROVIUED FOR STAFF APPROVAL Ss�r�ITTE� FOR (:OUNCIL REVIEW). �� . . • . � : �•� � � �� ....� . ,--;� � : ,: ��:�. �i -:.�: �• 6. A PLAN TO SCREEN PROPANE TAf�CS WH I CH I NQ.UDES BERM I NG. SCREEN I NG FENCE AND LANDSCAPING TO BE PROVIDED FOR STAFF APPROVAL; INCLUDED WITH IJaNDSCAPE PLAN. !. ITEMS �-6 ABOVE TO BE SUBMITTED BY t-EBRUARY y, lytS( (ALL ITEMS SUBMITTED). � t�. I-'ET I T I OI�ER AGREES TO PAY COSTS ASSOC I ATED W I TH RELOCAT I ON OF 1L I NCH WATERLINE AROUND EAST AND NORTH OF EXPANSION. A L10 INCH LINE TO BE I NSTALLED ON NORTH— SOUTH SE(�IENT: (:I TY TO PAY FOR COSTS OF ADDED S I ZE I . E. 1�"-l(d" . 0 1J 0 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -� APPOINTMENTS' FEBH7ARY 23, 198'7 (Tabl ed F�ebr ua ry 9, 198'7 ) �i y��+ � r,• � � v• • r� � � ,�i -ti � �?�� 9Q�ss� --------------------------- �,� • • ;`� 4-1-89 + 4-1-87 ----------------------------- 4-1-88 • �� • : • i � �� • a� � • � +a . � ►: � •i—_. . . 21/28 k 1��.�� ,��„�:��• Vacated b� Bruoe+ Peterson 1],/19/86 Glen D�uglas 861 66th Avenue N. E. ( H. 571-2074 ) --------------------- Vacated b� Dale �anpeon 5/19/86 Walter Rasnussen 7806 Alden Way N. E. ( H. 571-6232) 3 CITY OF FRIDLEY PLA'�WING COMMISSIOt� 14EETI��G, FEBRUARY 11, 1987 CAL L TO ORDER• Chairperson Billings called the February 11, 1987, Planning Comnission meeting to order at 1:33 p.m. ROLL CALL: Mer�bers Present: Steve Billings, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Dale Thompson (for Rich Svanda), Donald Betzold Menbers Absent: �Jone � Otliers Present: Jim Robinson, Planning Coordinator Jock Robertson, Cor�munity Develop�ent Director Duane IJaldoch, 1655 - 75th Ave. P�.E. Jim Determan, 1241 - 72nd Ave. N.E. APPROVAL OF JAP�UARY 28, 19�37, PLA�lNIWG C(N�IMISSI��J t1INUTES: Mr. Billings stated that on page 5, paragraph 3, second to last line, the words "stated that" should be inserted. MOTION BY l�R. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO APPROVE '_"HF. JAN. 28, 1987, PLa:T.VING COMMISSION MIIJUTF.S AS AINENDED. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUQLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATIOf� OF A SPECIAL USE PERP4IT, SP #87-01, BY EDtJARD AND ROSE WALDOCH: Per Section 205.13.1, C, 9, of the Fridley City Code to allow exterior storage of materials and eqaipnent on the east 125 feet of Lot 13, alock 2, Central View Planor, the sarie being 734J Central Avenue �J.E. .MO°_'ION BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MS. SHF.REY., TO OPEN THE PUBLIC NEARIf1G, UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THF, PUBLIC HEARIb'G OPEN AT 7:35 P.M. Mr. Robinson stated this property was locateJ west of Old Central between 73rd Ave. and 73'-Z Ave. The zoning was C-1, or neighborhood corrmercial, the City's lightest commercial zoning. The property was surrounded on the north and on the west by auto recycling yards.. Staff has�attempted several tiries irt the pas-t to get thi s property cl eaned up. There was a non-conformi nc� use in that there was a single family house, garage and an auto repair business on one tax parcel. These uses are legal non-conforming uses at this time. There were presently three income producinq operattons on the property: (1) the rental property, the house; (2) rental of the comnerciai building on the north of the site leased to Sam's Auto Parts; and (3) the petitioner uses the property for a lawn maintenance business. �J�1 PLANP�It�G COMt1ISSI0�J �1EETI��G�FEBRUARY 11 L 1987 PAGF 2 Mr. Robinson stated that at any given time, there was quite a bit of outside storage of trucks and equipment on the site. There have been cor�plaints from neighbors about the condition of the site. t�r. Robinson stated that on Sept. 30, 1986, the most recent tag was written for outside storage without a special use permit and also for the storage of junk vehicles. Judge Gibbs, who precided over the case gave the owners 30 days to apply for a special use permit and postponed the court hearin�. A court appearance was set for htarch 1, 1987, if necessary. So, the petitioner has made an application for a special use permit for outside storage. Mr. Robinson stated that at this time he would like to show the Comr.�issioners a video tape of the condition af the property. The video tape was taken the previous day. �4r. Robinson stated Staff was recor�mending the following stipulations: 1. Provide an 8 ft. high solid wood screening fence as per city plan dated Feb. 11, 1937, by P1ay 15, 1987. 2. All materials to be stored inside the fenced storage area belov� the top of the fence by May 15, 1987. 3. Install landscaping as per city plan dated Feb. 11, 1987, to include edging, mulch, weed barrier and lawn sprinkling by June 15, 1987. 4. Sod boulevard areas along Central Ave., 73rd Ave., and 732 Ave. as per city plan dated Feb. 11, 1987, by June 15, 1987. 5. Repaint building facade and trim by June 15, 1987. 6. Provide 6 ft. concrete curbing as per city plan dated Feb. 11, 1987, by June 15, 1987. 7. Rer�ove concrete island fram parking lot by June 15, 1987. 8. Repave and stripe parking lot and driveways by Sept. 15, 1987. 9. Provide a performance bond or a letter of credit in the amou�t of $5,000 to cover all of the above stipulations prior to Council approval. 10. Parking or storage of street inoperable and/or unlicensed vehicles is prohibited. 11. Parking of vehicles within street right-of-ways is prohibited - violaters will be tagged and/or towed within ten �iays. Date of possible action is Feb. 23, 1987. 12. No sales or leasing of vehicles is or will be permitted on this site. C`L'� PLA�J'JI��G Cai�tISSIOP! MEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1987 PAGE 3 13. Special use permit, SP #87-01, for outside storage for lawn care operation only and is intended for present owners only and is not transferrable to future owners. 14. Special use permit to be reviewed in six months. Mr. Kondrick asked if there had been any response from the neighborhood regarding the special use permit application. Mr. Robinson stated there had not been; however, there was quite a bit of rental property across the street. Mr. Saba stated he was concerned about the unlicensed vehicles beinq stored in violation of the agreement with Sam's Auto originally, lJhat would prevent that violation from reoccurring in spite of the special use permit? Mr. Robinson stated the special use permit would be just for the lawn maintenance business, and no cars could be parked out there that were inoperable or did not have a valid license. It would be a matter of policing it. Ms. Sherek asked if any of the vehicles parked out in front of Sam's were for sale. Mr. Duane Waldoch stated those vehicles were customers' cars that were waiting to be repaired or have been repaired and are waiting to be picked u�. However, there were some exceptions. Ms. Sherek asked how many vehicles were parked there for the lawn care service. Mr. Waldoch stated right now he had four trucks and two trailers. He planned to be cutting back on vehicles to 2-3 trucks. Mr. Waldoch stated he had talked to his legal counsel that day, and they had advised him not to make any agreements at this meetinq. Speaking for himself and his parents who own the property, he was in agreement to try to improve the property, but they had to look at it fror� the standpoint that when they bought the property, they were told they could use the property in the sarie manner it had always been used. Mr. Waldoch stated Sam has been using the property for about 10-12 years and that was one of the conditions when buying the property that Sam would conti nue to be a.ren �flr of the property . Mr. Waldoch stated before he purchased the property, he had about 12 hour conversation with Steve Olson, who was with Inspections in the Public Works Department. He asked �1r. Olson what had to be done to the prcrperty so they knew what was required by the City before they urchased the property. At that time, Mr. Olson told him three things: (1� In 1982, the southwest corner of the property used to empty into 73rd and Old Central. Mr. Olson stated barrels or some type of barrier had to be put up so there would be no 3C PLANNII�G COt1�•1ISSION f�EETING FEBRUARY 11 1987 PAGE 4 access at that point. (2) �4r. Olson gave hiM a five year timetable on the dirt area on the southerly side of the property �•�here gas tanks had been rernoved and it had not been tarred over the top. (3) painting the building. Mr. Waldoch stated wh�t the City was doing was taking 20 ft, away from the parking area which has always been a parking area and giving them only six stalls. Also, over the years the property has been made smaller from road improvements--ir�provements to 73rd Ave., 732 Ave., and Old Central. Mr. Waldoch stated this process was a new experience for him, and he was willing to work out an agreement; but he could not agree to the stipulations as presented at this meeting. The City was proposinq to take 50� of his parking and make it a green area. If that was done, then Sam could not utilize the property and they lose a renter and 2/3 of the rental that cor�es from Sam. Mr. Billings stated the parking proposed by the City was six stalls. How many parking stalls did t4r. Waldoch feel he needed? ��r. Waldoch stated he needed 15-20 parking spaces, depending on the number of employees. Ms. Sherek stated there seemed to be a misunderstanding on the part of the petitioner in that city ordinances have always prohibited parking of vehicles from a business on city right-of-way. That outer perimeter of the lot that was being proposed as green area and landscaped was city right-of-way. The right-of-way ran with the deed of the property and was a legal description. This area might have been used for parking in the past, but it was not a legal parking area now or ever had been. Mr. Waldoch stated that if this should never have been a parking area, then that should have been brought up by Mr. Olson or someone from the City before he purchased the property. He came in all honesty to the City of Fridley to find out what needed to be done before they purchased the property. At that time, Mr. Olson told him the conditions he had outlined earlier, and they purchased the property with the understanding that their proposed use of the property was feasible, because the property had been used that way in the past. If they had known any of the things they were being told now, they would not have purchased the property and would have located somewhere else. One of the things they looked at with the Fridley�site was that because of_the iunk vards, possibly in ten years the junk yards would not be there, and this could be a very nice looking property. Mr. Waldoch stated something he would like to add was that when the work was done on 73rd Ave., that was $8,000 worth of assessments put on their property which did not help any business on 73rd Ave., plus the fact that it took another 3 ft. of property away from them. Mr. Waldoch stated that as far as the�unlicensed vehicles. when thgv were issued the tickets, those vehicles were moved by Sam. Most of the vehicles are shifted or moved every day on a ten-day cycle. Sam has told him that a lot of times a customer will drop a vehicle off to be repaired and sometimes stay while waiting for a part, possibly a cou�le of weeks. As far as "junk" � 3D PLANNING COMt1ISSI0N NEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1987 ____ _ PAGE 5 vehicles, as discussed with Staff that morning, some of the cars parked there look like "junk" but are licensed and are operating and are customers' cars that are being used. And, that is part of the problem, because the cars do look like junk cars. Sam is getting blamed for junk cars being parked there, but those vehicles are waiting �o te fixed and go back on the road. 14s. Sherek stated Sam's Repair Shop was really separate from the junk yard. She thought a distinction had to be made between San parking junk vehicles (which on occasion he does do) and customers cars that really are being turned over. He cannot run a repair garage if he is permitted to run the repair garage on the site, but yet has no place to park the custoriers' cars. Mr. Waldoch made the suggestion that on the west side (back side) of the garage which runs against Sam's lot, that an extension of Sam's existing fence be run�along �he�property line through the green area to the front of the garage on Central Ave. If that was done, he did not think they would need to use the driveway that was in the back now. And, if this was done, San could continue to run his operation over into that area. Possibly some stipulations would need to be made, but Sam could use that area to store some of the cars and have access to the garage. It would screen all the unwanted cars that are being seen out front. P1r. Billings stated he saw a problem in that the City Council already speci- fically said that with regard to Sam's license application for a junk yard, he cannot use the Waldoch property to store junk cars. t�1r. Billings as�;ed if 2-3 more stalls could be added to the six stalls proposed on Central Ave. Mr. Robinson stated he thought there was room for a little bit of growth, poss;bly to s stalls. t4s. Sherek asked if there was a possibility of instead of fencing the back portion, it be turned into a parking area? ��r. Robinson stated if they are thinking about changing the stipulations on the storage, then they ►�ould have to recommend to City Council to chanqe the stipulations on the license. He had no particular problem with that, except to the point where they create another junk yard. Mr. Robinson stated he would like to give a little history on �•�hat has heen done regarding this property in the past: In 1976, the City sent a letter to the owner of the property before Mr. Waldoch, which outlined six items, five of which had been discussed a� this meeting. 7his letter was written by Mr. Boardman, City Planner, at that time. It talked about vehicles on the boulevards, inoperable vehicles, etc. Also included was a plan for improvement much like the one before the Commission at this meeting. 3E PLANNIPJG C0�1P1ISSIO�J MEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1987 PAGE 6 In 1981, a letter was sent to Sam, the renter of tlie property, that told him about the parking on the boulevards. In 1982, Mr. Boarcimar put a note into the file saying he had talked � to Duane Waldoch who was the potential purchaser of the property about the improvements and cleaning up of the property, and Mr. Waldoch seened to be agreeable to the improvements. In Feb. 19II6, Ric Wiersma of City Staff, sent a letter to �1r. IJaldoch outlining eight improvements which basically included everything discussed at this meeting. Mr. Robinson stated that was what they had in writing. He could not comment on what P4r. Waldoch was told by a former city staff person. What they have in writing does bear out that the City has been earnestly pursuinq improvements on this property for at least ten years and very little, if anything, has been done to improve the site. Mr. Billings stated he would be inclined to look at the possibility of 2-4 additional parking spaces on the Central Ave. side. He did not think he would be in favor of opening up the whole area on the north side of the corrnercial building for a fenced-in area because he thought it would be contrary to the wishes and intent of the City Council, who specifically indicated they do not want a junk yard over there. He thought a fence would do that, whether they wanted it to or not. Mr. Waldoch stated that on the north side corner, there was a driveway cor�ing into tlie property. There was actually an entryway prepared by the city on the corner of 73z and Old Central. In the proposed site plan, the City was pro- posing that be taken out, but that was put in by the City. If there wasn't supposEd to be an entryway there, why was one put in? Also, all up and down Old Central, businesses do park right up to Old Central. In talking about setbacks and city right-of-way, why are they allowed to do that? Mr. Billings stated some of the stipulations listed were already city code. Mr. Waldoch was not being picked on. Whenever a petitioner comes in for a special use permit, they try to get the pruperty up to city code. t�lr. Waldoch stated the only thing he can say at this time was that he had been advised by his attorney that he should not agree to anythinq at this time. Mr. Robinson stated the City's objective was simply to get the property cleaned up. They want to be realistic and do not want to impose stipulations or conditions that are so strenuous, the property owner won't do anything. He would recommend some of the curbing be eliminated and just go with curbing to define the two driveways and set the limits for the parking area adjacent to Old Central. They coul�d add two more parking stalls. Regarding the storage area, if the Commission felt it was in the City's best interest to expand it, it would still be an improvement to the property. 3F PLANNING CQMt4ISSI�N �4EE7ING, FEBRUARY 11, 1987 PAGE 7 Mr. Waldoch agreed that the reduction in curbing would be better, but he still really had a problem with the reduction in parking area. Mr. Determan stated he owned Determan Welding close to Mr. Waldoch's property. He tho�rght some consideration shoi�ld be given to these businesses who cannot afford to make extensive improver�ents and end up going out of business. Con- sideration should be given when money is not available and give the businesses more time to do the work. MOTION BY MS. SHEREK, SECOl7DED BY MR. KONDRICK� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYL', CHAIRPERSO:: BILLINGS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CIASED AT 8:50 P.M. The Corr�nissioners concurred that this special use permit request should be tabled as there seemed to be no concurrence with the petitioner on the stipulations. MOTIDN BY MR. KONDRICK, SECONDED BY MR. SABA, TO TABLE SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #87-01, BY EDWARD A1VD ROSE WALDiDCN, UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Billings encouraged Mr, tJaldoch to take the site plan and stipulations, get tagether with his legal counsel as soon as possible, and then get together with Staff to come up with an alternatiye plan that was agreeable to both the petitioner and city staff. 2. COtJSIDERATION OF A ZONING.CODf CHANGE PERTAINING TO GARAGE SETBACKS: P•1r. Betzo1d stated the Appeals Commission seems to get a lot of requests for variances from people who have single car garages and want double car garages. They are primarily talk�ng about houses constructed in the 1950's, 1960's, and early 1970's. In most of the caSes, the house was constructed in the center of the lot with a single car garage which looked nice back tl�en, but as times change, the double car garage is now the standard. In fact, by today's code, all new construction has to have a double�car garage. So, people with single car garages are trying to expand to double car garages. By having the house situated in the center of the lot and then expanding the single car garage to the double car garage, they get a little too close to the lot line. Mr. Betzold stated there might be individuals who feel they cannot do this simply because the code does not allow it. In order to allow it, a person has to get a variance which means coming before the Appeals Comnission. The problem comes in that by strict definition the law says that before the Appeals Commission can grant a variance, there has to be a hardship--some- tF�ing unique about the property that says the code ought to be varied. And, 3G PLAtJNING C0�1t1ISSI0N MEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1987 __PAGE 8 in these cases, there really isn't a hardship that says a person should have a double car garage. So, the Appeals Cor.mission really has to work to try to find a hardship in order to grant the variance, and it was really a disservice to the law in order to do it. So, if they cannot find the hard- ship, the better way to do it was to change the code, which was what he was suggesting. �qaybe the code ought to he changed to allow people to build a little closer to the lot line for the single purpose of having a two-car garage. That would also allow people to bring their property up to code by having the two-car garage. Mr. Betzold stated the philosophy right now was there should be a certain distance between adjacent_structures, particularly in case of fire. What the code says now was structures should not be closer than ten feet, garage to garage. The only way to build closer was by getting a var�ance. That was where the trouble came in because in order to build a double car garage, they could not do it within 5 ft. of the lot line. The standard garage width for a two-car garage was 22 ft., and they usually come within 4 ft, or 3 ft., and sometimes a little bit closer. Mr. Betzold stated his proposal was on page 2 of the agenda. Basically, he was proposing the following: On existing, single-car, attached garages, the side yard may be reduced to three (3) feet provided the new garage is: 1. No wider than 22 feet. 2. The adjacent structure is a house and at least ten (10) feet from the lot line. *3. The adjacent structure is an attached two-car garage and is at least four (4) feet from the lot line. If the adjacent structure is a single-car garage, the setback for the new garage cannot be less than four (4) feet. Exterior walls of attached garages, ?ess than five (5) feet from a property line, must be constructed cf materials approved for one- hour fire resistence on the inside and no unprotected openings are allowed. The maximum roof projection is limited to two (2) feet. *At no time can two attached garages be closer than 8 feet, and the distance between an attached garage and a house can be not less.than 13 feet. �4r. Betzold stated that on page 2A, ��Ir. Clark had put together 3ome samples of just how the code would work. � 3H PLANNIIJ6 COMt4ISSI0N MEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1987 ____ PAGE 9 Mr. Betzold stated this particular item was on the Appeals Comnission agenda last week, but the meeting was not held because of a lack of quorum. He stated they will be discussing it at the Feb. 17th meeting. Preliminarily, he has gotten no objections from the Appeals Commission on this prop�sal. Ms. Sherek stated she liked this proposal because it addressed a specific prc�bl em. The Commissioners were in agreement with the ordinance change for existing one stall garage side yard setbacks as proposed by Mr. Betzold. 3. RECEIVE JANUARY 20, 1987,.ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COM�4ISSION MINUTES: MOTION BY MR. THOMPSON, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE TXE JAN. 20, 1987, ENVIRONf�BFTAL QUALITY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED TNE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. OTI�ER QUSI��ESS: a. Feb. 17, 1987, Appeals Commission meeting minutes Mr. Betzold stated that because of a lack of a quorum, there was no Appeals Commission meeting on Feb. 3. This meeting has been rescheduled for Feb. 17th, and because of some urgency on the part of the petitioners to move ahead, he was asking the Planning Corrmission if they had any objection to the Feb. 17th minutes going directly to the City Council without going to the Planning Corrmission first to be received which was the usual procedure. He gave a brief description of the variance requests that would be discussed at that meeting. MOTION BY 14R. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, THAT THE FEB. 17, 1987, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES CO DIRECTLY T10 THE CITY COUNCIL ON FEB. 23, 1987, WITHOUT BEING ROUTED FIRST TKROiIGX THE PLANNING COMMISSION. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL �/OTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNAl1IMOUSLY. b. CDBG Allocations Mr. Robinson stated the City Council had made a motion to approve the COBG allocations at their Jan. 26th meeting. There were some chanqes in the 1987 CDBG funding allocations and the 1989 funding allocations. These were outlined in his Feb. 3rd memo to Mr.Robertson. Mr. Robinson stated also attached to the memo was the Neighborhood Commercial Rehab Loans Program Guidelines for the City of Fridley dated Feb. 3, 1987. 3! PLANNING C0�414ISSIQN MEETING, FEBRUARY ]1, 1987 _ PAGE _10 c. Planning Commission Goal Setting Mr. Robinson stated that at the Jan. 28th meeting, the Planning Commission members had discussed the possibility of establishinq goals and objectives related to long-term planning issues facing the City. In his Feb. llth memo to the Planning Commission members, he had outlined a five step program whereby this could be accomplished. If this proposal was agreeable to the Comnissioners, he would send it on to the City Council for their concurrence. Mr. Kondrick stated he felt this Commission needed to be more involved in the planning process and he was fully in agreement with this proposal. However, he would like to take more time to review this a little more carefully. t�r. Robinson stated they could discuss the steps outlined in his memo more at the next meeting, ADJOURtJMENT: MOTION BY MS. SXEREK, SECONDED BY MR. BETZOLD, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL �/OTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED TXE FEB. 11, 198i, PLANNING COhAlISSION MEETING AA70URNED AT I0:05 P.M. Respectfully submitted, ,,i L nne Saba Recording Secretary CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COt41ISSI0P� t1EETING, JANUARY 13, 1987 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Betzold ca]led the January 13, 19a7, Appeals Cormissi meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL C/ILL: tler.ibers Present: Donald Betzold, Alex Qarna, Jerry Sh Y.en Vos , hter�bers Absent: ��one Otl�ers Present: Darrel Clark, City of Fridl R. V. Plovak, Longvierr Fibr 4Jalter Rockenstein. Fae e& Qenson btELC0i1E iJEU COF1t1ISSI(1P1 t1Et1EER: Y.E�JPjL`fH VOS � , Diane Savage, 4 �tr. Betzold ��elco�ed Dr. Ken Vo o the Cor�nissio�. tle stated Dr. Vos vras a Prufessor of Nathenatics Educ ion at the College of St. Catherine. Or. Vos y�as a`orner r�er,�t,er of the Cocm ity Developr.�ent Cocriission and r�hen it rias disbancled, he chose to becor.ie a�emb of the Appeals Coemission. APPROVlIL OF DECEtiCER . 1986. APPEALS C0�1t1IS5I�tl NIPJUTES: MO':IG1N BY ILS. SAV�G`E� SECONDED BY MR. BARNA� TO APPROVE TXE DECEl�ER 16� 1986, APPEALS COI�iMISS�N I�lINUTES. ��tr. 8arna s ted tf�at on page 3, paragraph 5, the third sentence st�ould be changed to read a follows: "He had also built an addition onto a house similar to this house." ��A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CNAIRPERSQN BE�ZOLD DECLARED TH8 1�lINUTES ROVED AS AMENDED. � 1. CO'ISIDERATIO�� OF VARIAtlC PURSUAt1T �� CItAPTER 205. S, VAR 4a , OF -OF-CJ7L 3, OF �Q FE �'fFiA'T�' T_�n _ 36 . BY LOt�GV I EW FI aRE COt1PAtIY 1HOTION BY XR. BARNA, SECONDED BY PtR. SFIEREK, TO OPEIY TRE PUBLIC BEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED TKE PUBLIC NEARItIG OPEN AT 7s3? P.R. � � Af'f�E�+LS COtiNISSIO�� HEETIPJG, JANUARY 13, 1987 PAGE 2 Chairperson Betiold read the Adninistrative Staff Report: ADt1It�ISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 5851 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E. LOt�GV I EW F I aRE C0�IPANY VAR #II6-36 A. PU[3LIC PURPOSE SERVED QY P,CQUIREtlENT; Section 205.1a.3, D, 4a, requires a setback from the street right-of-riay line, abutting a residential district, of 100 feet. Public purpose served.by this requirement is to avoid con�estion in the put�lic street and traffic hazards and other dangers and to protect and conserve the ciiaracter of any adjoining neighborhoods and future neigl�borhoods in the sane vicinity. Section 205.18.3, 0, 3, requires a front yard depth of not less than 25 feet. Put,lic purpose served by areas around industrial purposes. B. STATED IIAROSHIP: this requirer�ent is to provide adequate open structures for aesthetic and fire-fighting "We plan on p��tting more nachinery and warehouse space in, and the wall configuration has to be straight." C. ADt1It1ISTP,ATIVE STAFF REVIE�J: The petitioner is requesting to add more warehouse space onto the north end of their present facility. They v�ould prefer it to be 200 feet deep and continue on at the sane rear setback line as the present facility (�0 feet). The Qurlington t�orthern Railroad property adjoins the rear lot line. The right-of-way of East River Road tapers into the property on the west side (front yard). In order to maintain a 200 foot deep structure, the building would be approxinately 60 feet from the right-of-viay at ti�e northwest corner. If the Appeals Comnission recomnends approval of this request, the Staff - recor,mends that the Commission stipulate that the petitioner work with � Staff on easements to be dedicated and outside improve�ents. The petitioner is also going througt� a plattinc� process. The preliminary plat hearing before the Planning Comission is scheduled for Jan. 2a, 1987. A�r�EA�s C0�1�1ISSI0�! r�EETI"!G, JA"�UARY 13, 1987 PAGE 3 Mr. Clark �shov�ed the C , .issioners and the approxinately location of was contemplating purchasing more Northern to plat additional space _ The petitioner is also going been adding more and more land to easier to follor�. The prelir�inary Planning Corr�niss�on. a small scale drawing showing the zoninc� the property. He stated the petitioner property and then .ioining with Burlington to the north. through the platting the plat, making the plat hearing will be process. They have descriptions much on Jan. 28th at the � �i � ��1r. Clark stated the petitioner was proposing two phases for the proposed adciition, He stated t�r. tJovak, Plant �1anager for Longview Fibre, and Mr. Rockenstein, an attorney representang the petitioner, were in the audience. They would be able to further elaborate on rrhy they needed the 200 ft. deep building and the hardships. Mr. Clark stated Staff anci tl�e easements, and petitioner continue to outs i de i mprover��ents . for the City Council. was working v�ith the�petitioner on the landscapin� that was the reason for the stipulation that the work with Staff on the easements to be dedicated and ile stated nore exact information would be available t�ir. Betzold stated that as far as the rear yard setback, r�as it presently at 2U ft.? t4r. Clark stated that was correct. They would be continuinq thP same building iine. As far as access for fire and emergency vehicles, they are also workir►q on that with the p�titioner. There was about 200-300 ft. or rr�re of open space that was occupied by the railroad, and that would probably rer�ain the sar�e forever. Across the tracks, there was sor.te industrial plant space. �4r. Barna stated that from the back of the buiidinq, the 20 ft. was to the property line and not the railroad tracks. Hov� far were the railroad tracks? Mr. Clark stated a railroad spur cane right into the existinq building. They will �e loading and unloading within the building itself. Fiopefully, there will be enougf� room for at least a 15 ft. gravel road or something for fire- fighting purposes. ' P•tr. Rockenstein stated he would first like to tell the Cor.xnission a little bit about r�hat Longview Fibre did, then the two phases of the development, anc� then why they have a hardship and need to build the addition in the configuration shown to the Comnission. �1r. Rockenstein stated Longview Fibre was a �nanufacturer of cardboard boxes for other manufacturers' products. They employ 137 people, running three shifts a day, 6-7 days a week. He stated their current output per month was 57,QQ0,000 sq. ft. of cardboard. � Mr. Rockenstein stated beca�se they are almost at capacity, they are consider- ing this expansion. The expansion would probably corie in fi►�o phases. The first phase of 240 ft. by 200 ft. would allow them to move the roll stock which cories in on freight cars and add further rrachinery in the plant rihere L�,1� APPEALS COf41ISSI0N t1EETItlG, JANUARY 13, 1987 PAGE 4 they currently have roll stock. The second expansion 1of 200 ft. by 200 ft. � would r�ake the building long enough for them to put in a.new high speed corregating machine which will run 350 ft. down the side of the building and give theM sufficient room for all the roll stock to be there with tlie equipr.�ent which does the various operations on the cardboard located in the rest of the facility. That r�ould enable theM then to meet what thc�y think v�ill be the future demand. Why then, did they need the two phases? t1r. Rockenstein stated when they order one of tliese 55-8 million high speed corregating machines, it takes two years to have it delivered. At this point, they.are not certain they want to build the entire building and have a portion of it sitting enpty for two years. They might build phase 1, move the roll stock, and then buil�l phase 2 as the nachine becomes available. 4liiat exactly was the hardship that caused them to need this much space in this configureation? �ir. Rocken5tein stated shorring the layout of the actual building was the easiest way to help explain the hardship. Fle stated they need to maintain the rear building line because they cannot put a 5 ft. jog in the railroad tracks inside the builJing. It has to come in at the one end and lead down ttie current building and partway into the existing building. They will shorten the line up some��hat. Secondly, the length of the h��ildinc� was dictated by the corregating machine itself which was 350 ft. long, the need for starch r�achinery at the one end, and the need for sone space at the otl�er end of the machine in order to unload the product. So, the key factors for the length of the building were the length of the corregatinc� machine and tiie starch machine. Hr. Rockenstein stated that in order to move the product through, they load the rolls at the one end, the rolls drive down the nachine, come off at tv�o sets of large rollers, turn onto a smart cart line (one of the improvements that will be made in the plant), and the smart cart will deliver�the product to the conveyors leading to the nactiinery. The product has to be off and c�ear of the electrical control room (an existing electrical control roo�), and that was one of the reasons for the width of the building. The other major reason for the width of the building was the-fact that they have to store enough product to feed the high speed corregatinq nachine and the roll stocl; is, in fact, stocked in that area. The building was about as high as it can be in terms of the roll storage. Because these are 98 inch rolls wei9hing 2'-2 tons apiece, they can only stack them approximately three high, so the building will have 27 ft. of clear storage inside and triple stack will be 2432 ft. high. :t1r. Rockenstein stated the inside use of the railroad tracks r�as dictated by the fact that their r;�achinery cannot safely unload 2� ton rolls on a platform that is covered with water. They use front-end loaders. Sno►�i and water r.iean the ability to maneuver these and stopping and startinc� can be very difficult, plus the inpact of winters,other than this current v�inter, on unloading the roll stock. 4D APPEALS CO�it1ISSI0�� MEETIP�G, JA��UARY 13, 1987 PAGE 5 Mr. Rockenstein stated these were all the reasons for the stated hardship and why they need to put the buiiding into the configuration presented. Mr. Rockenstein stated that in ansr�er to P1r. Barna's question about how far away was the nearest railroad tracks, the nearest rail line was approx. ]5 ft. aviay. There was more than sufficient room for fire and emergency vehicles do�vn the back, and there was ro plan to build any obstruction in this area which r�ould prevent the access for fire and emergency vehicles. MOTION BY MR. BARNA� SECONDED BY DR. VOS� TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC XEAI;ING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE PUBLIC HARING CLOSED AT 7:55 P.M. Mr. Barna stated he_had driven by this building every day for about 20 years. t�is only concern would have been the impact of the far northern corner of the building and the attention by people drivinn alonq East River Road. He was quite satisfied that the distance back from East River Road would cause no visibility problems. He stated Longvievr Fibre has been a good business and an asset to the City of Fridley. Ne viould be in favor of grantinc� the variances. Ms. Savage stated she had no problem with the variances as requested. This was already an attractive industrial site. She thought the additi�on was worthwhile, and it looked like it would continue to be an attractive property. Mr. Barna stated he felt the hardships had been well explained by the attorney. P1r. Sherek stated he believed there was sufficient hardship in the shape of the property to justify these variances, and he would vote in favor of granting the variances. Dr. Vos stated the only concern he had was the R-1 and R-3 housing across the street, but there seemed to be adequate rooM. He did not see any reason not to grant the variances as proposed. - h1r. Beizoid stated he thought the plan was excelient, and the existing building was already 20 ft. away from the rear property line. With the railroad being back there, it would not make any sense to make a 5 ft. jog in the buiiding. He also agreed with the hardship as explained by htr. Rockenstein and stated he would be in favor of qranting the variances. 4E APPEALS COI1t1ISSI0t� MEETING, JA�JUARY 13, 1987 PAGF 6 MOTION BY MR. BARNA, SECONDED BY MS. SAVAGE� TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VARIANCE REpUESTS� VAR M86-36� BY LONGVIEW FIBRE COMPANY, PURSUANT 2'a CHAPTER 205.18.3, D, 4a, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCF THE SETBACK FROM THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FROEi I00 FEET T�0 62 FEETj AND, PURSUANT TO CNAPTER 205.18.3, D� 3� OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO REDUCE THE REAR YAP.D SETBACK FROM ?5 FEET TO 20 FEET TO ALLOW TKE CON- STRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL WAREHOUSE SPAC6 ON ALL THAT PART OF TXE NORTNEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTXEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, T-30,R-29, AND LOTS 9 AND 10, AUDZTOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 78, TNE SAME BEING 5851 EAS7' RIVER ROAD, FRIDLEY, I�IIV. 55432, WITH THE STIPULATION TIIAT THI: PETITIONER WORK WITN STAFF ON EASEMENTS T+O BE DEDICATED AND OUTSIDE IMPROVEMENTS. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CXAIRP�RSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Betzold stated these minutes would go to the Planninq Comnission on Jan. 28, at rihich time the Planning Corrnission v�ould also hold a hearing on the preliminary plat. The variances and the plat would then go to the City C�uncil on Feb. 23. 2. OTNER BUSINESS: Mr. Betzold stated he sent a letter to Jim Robinson, Planning Coord' ator, last November suggesting some consideration of changes or policy eview on some of the questions the Appeals Cormission has been struggli with, particularly the variance requests for two car garages--the tuation being ti�e older single family hoi►ie centered in the middle of th ot with a one- car garage. A homeowner requests a variance to expand at one-car garage to a two-car garage, going closer to the lot line in e process. The Cormission has ben struggling for sone time to fin the hardship for this situation. Mr. Betzold stated he was suggesting that m e the code needed to be changed. He has talked to �•ir. Clark and s met informally with the City Council. They all seen to be in vor of the following proposal he would suggest where if a homeo►•mer w ts to �onl expand a one-car garage to a two car garage, 22 ft. wide, th person wou��d not fiave to request a variance to 3 ft. from the prop ty line as long as the neighboring structure was at least 5 ft. away on th otl�er side. The exception would be if there was a single car garage on e other side which could possibly also be expanded. In that situa on, they might want to let the home�owner go to 4 ft. from ti�e proper line. Of course, there would be no openings and = the wall would have o be a fire-rated wall. He asked the Comnissioners � what tl�ey thought f this proposed code change. Mr. Clark st ed tf�is was not in conflict with the present buildi�g code. As the Co ssioners knev�, the present zoning code required a two-car garage on all construction, so this would enable people to bring their property up to ode. F�e stated Mr. Betzold had also pointed out that there v�ere sor.ie peo e who know the code says 5 ft. from the property line and so thPy don't en come in to request a variance for one reason or another. Maybe there would be more two car garages in the City �if the code was changed. ♦�� / 'I�1: �IN�� [�] ► ■ ►�� _\ : VAR #86-36 4 G Longview Fibre / -- — - - -- --� � I i `�------:a�.��---- _ I � � .� � Es �;�- � . 62' � � - - - "- "-�°- - - -- - - ' vs: . oo, . 5 � l � �_ t � { � � � i �_ �► ! e� � � -, � 3 M � i� — � o — V r- � -' • � � / � ' _'I ' .. _ __"."'_'___ � / _� _ . . . - Ti � r .i , r , � �� `�� - - ----- -, ' � ` � � � ; � � �'�?z: ; ` ; � s� - . 1,�; �--.s ,= :--- ..� � i � , ,G _ = .- -r! 1 r � � i'� �; /� � � , � ;� f: i � a �� • c // e' y ?' _ I � `t � ;sl� :`�=-�' �.:�, , , !, �. 1 .....=�F._.__. _, I % j i � ; � �_' � � ,, % � r—� � �' . . � // . --7 - - - -= - - � / u ,nc�aa i� � � �� i/' ; / �� , t i �,/ . �� a3 , '� \� ; `\` �; F I / /' P D � '�� ... . . �� _ I ; . � ,3 ` �i a • �/ n ' % �� r � J� ( /,� i�/ � v, � � .- -»...�: � � / i /// � I ! 1 i � � 1 1, � I I I i� I �� , i � I . t � � . V . � � � ' � I � I . � � _ .------ - � � S�T�. �LAN �uv�v ie� r i�Rt ,. ,.. . - � �. �. f'ETITIONER WORK WITH STAFF ON EASEMENTS TO BE DEDICATED AND OUTSIDE IMPRONEMENTS. + �, (:OUNCIL AGREES TO EXTEND DURATION C� TIN� BEFORE VARIANCE LAPSES FROM NOfW-USE, FRCM Of�E TO THREE YEARS ( SEE ATTACHED KOCKENSTE I N MEMO DATED �EBRUA�Y 12, 1987). 4H G(p�GC [. ��D MG Cw `o-+ e ..o:ic.. - »VhN a.'� •r JC.�[^ a[n�.�� .�0� o;C3 '. ..Ce�a - c.cc cc oo�oo� c s.,io�c.[. :o�.�c •��c.�.� s*.c .,-�... Y n c.w.u.c. cc �c +o..� p .c �o-w c � . � •�:.c..«o o: �o ... suo,[ :�c :wo c�sc�.�� o•[. �or�c a -c..�.s.c:,�.. �is w-c�. ov:�i� oo•c.. pw .o�...c G=��6C w~r� wr ..,,�iw: �°:ow°[w .+cs �. s..+•�cs DAt[ [ •[��O��C• `[ee.w�rC��,r e..,oc4 s-ce..c.. •os�o�.• 00s e�•_co 0 � •. +.. .. cc� .cF�n.:•.. �o�.c� .. .c..�. •s �co �osco CC .c.�n •�s c. o�. •[rc ..o=. ^cns�.. JO .�V.O •[�ir c.. +O�ti • �0�=04 7u�5 to �G� •CF - so�. •p o � c�. . :c_ t • c.:. . c.�.o:.•.. «...cs c s•[.�t. . •..sc-. �• �.c .. .�..•rc • s_' ..c.r+o• • •oc.+�c.� r .��.c• s.[v[ti c fC��OCw �o-�. . •o•c[. ��.o o..o -[_o[ s•ir +z so.. s�c.G ��.��-:wscr D��D�[! 5��[�q[ll :i�(s ( r� �OISOM ��cu . �c.. ,��.�� .t.(S (tiGr��[�lCw �[s O MC�♦ 5�,�.• • �O�MSD�. •r� _ .o-.c«s.r�.+ �• �' ' it� �tti� �'..'.•�• ° _ Cow�,C C 5�(��e� wc..o• � wno,..c io-..y °o• �O DE weIDCN COUa� B3 �+Cw C�vEtiD�S�+ S�AEE* IONOON w1M 7R��CNOLAMD O�/SBO-35�2 TELECOPiEp 6�i-�1�5 TELE� ee�i0a• FAEGRE 8� BENSON 2300 MULTi�00D5 TOwER 33 SOUTM SIXTM STREET MINNEAPOL15. MINNESOTA 55�02-369♦ 6�Z/])�-5700 7Cl[COO�Ep ]��-]�SY TEIEx �25i3� SU�T[ �i30. D�00 TOwER �100 NOpMANDAI[ IAKf OOULfVAAO �IOOMINpTOM,M�NNCBOTA 39�J7-'07� 6�2 �D2� •2700 �_E_^.v Ca G7 -22�� C�E+ �25�J� February 12, 1987 Mr. James Robinson Planning Specialist City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue, N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 �Y[f l.vO��MG .�.o..�s .. �c....�w .°. c .c°, w� s•°c..w, o.��o ^ce . �1 �[�[A~� ��Oi� s:iv�MNC ♦ •fr[O�O! c.. w -tio.cws w.�s.�w .-. s�cccs..v..o o�cw. w ro� .,[.....�..c . �i[ o...o�..• w sc-v.. r�c. o ::t+ c»• • •.o �icn- ,•.[s •w.s. �+. �. s,r�o o.«�c� � �� uw� � �wotweo.. �i��or. 4.•��+�CS • - cc•.•+c ��«�ii�Jw^�cw:�o:� tcw: .o •..oc.so+ + p: +o��o .�c. c. �cu.e JOwM r �UA�w�Lw�Cj i•�[ o w�wo +�cc �. •...c+sor fCO�+ �. O��wC ot.�.w�• t�w�c.. C�AO� w[�AN �[s :cwsc+ _ s,i�, .�o .. .�ow�..ousc o .w. •o��o «o+w�ssc. i��w. . �Jf�• c c»•.�[a .•.�oo..•.e +i._c .c.:.s�:. .t�y .ic. �cs 41 �o±a..s . owc .c.:.�w[ e`...c.w�..•. � y�r��D �.CO t w(.[�. 00�+• . G�[GO+�y�SC��(r(u iOwM w •Oi.[• ��r � c��o. [. e+s•+�. •c� �o•.�� .. .c• a.• c� o..:� '..`is<.�..... �os�... .. ...i.s.c••c. �c�� c..w:cc. . s..,,- � ..[ . �c.�.a::c ro��• ►nc+ao+ •ow.cs •wv�[ o.'c°wo�io�• �ioo•�iii�• •...� NOw(� f, D�ur�.( o.r ... o�...o.c ==v�C �'O�OS�[�y t,w.wG ♦ f. rOt D�t r •O+( c s.. -• s �..�a •.��• .•..0 ..csc.�.w 2900 4EPU�l�C e��2• »O SEVENTCENr�. STREET DENVfi�. COIOii�00 50202-�00• 70�/392-5l90 TEtCCOO�ER Sit-S6D7 Re: Extention Of Time To Begin Construction Pursuant To Variances Requested For Longview Fibre Company Dear Mr. Robinson: As you know I am representing Longview Fibre Company in its application to the City of Fridley to expand Longview's manufacturing facility at 5851 East River Road, Fridley, Minnesota 55440. As part of this applicatior. Longview Fibre Company is seeking variances to reduce the setback from the street right-of-way line from 100 feet to 62 feet and to reduce the rear yard setback from 25 feet to 20 feet to accomodate the proposed expansion. Due to the over two year gap between ordering and receiving the corrugating'machine which will be in- stalled in the plant, the expansion may be built in two phases. The first phase does not require the variances. The second phase does, and construction on the second phase might not begin for two or more years. Consequently, Longview Fibre Company specif- ically requests that in granting the variances the Fridley City b'r. James Robinson February 12, 1987 Page 2 Council extend the time before expiration of Longview's right to commence construction of phase two under the variances extended from the normal one year to three years. Sincerely yours, ; ;;� / . ;� % �fa _ vC��C �. n . � � ,� Walter H. Rocker.stein II WHR;pkr cc: Robert V. Novak 4�J APPEALS COt1t1ISSI0"� �IEETIt�G, FEBRUARY 17, 19�7 2. 5 PAGE 4 Qetzold stated this would go to the City Council on Feb. 23. The petitioner shou t in touch with Staff before then, though, to�see if, for any reason, is variance would have to be withdrawn or republished. ERATION OF A �CE RE 11EST VAR #87-02 8Y KURT NANUFACTURING Y, PURSUANT 70 CHAP __05_18_3^ C^T1a��OF TNE FRIDLEY CfTY ROnE YO _STORY BUILDI"!G ,�„ FRIDLEY, P1It�"JESOTHs 55��i. MOTION BY MR. SHERp'K, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC NEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSC>N BETZOLD DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPElJ AT 7:51 P.M. Chairperson Qetzold read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMItJISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 5280 F1AIN STREET KURT t1ANUFACTURING C0. VAR #87-02 A. PUQIIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREt4ENT: Section 205.18.3, C, la, requires that the maximum percentage or the area of a lot allowed to be covered by the main building and all accessory buildings for a one-story building is forty percent maximum. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide for adequate parking, open landscaped areas, and to limit congestion of industrial areas. B. STATED NARDSHIP: . "The nature of our busirress is precision machining. The materials required are very expensive castings, weldments, ir�pact extrusions, etc. These materials require certification and documentation, meaning that we have paperwork and serialization requirements. The area in question now has a complete roof constructed of steel bar joists, steel decking, and an asphalt and gravel roof. The ground is now of a blacktop surface that is not level or smooth. My request for a variance would allov� enclosing this area, frost proofing of footings, new concrete flooring, lighting, and heating. Kurt hianufacturing Company has had problems with pilferage, parts bein� danaged by weather and moisure, and an unreasonable amount of time for the parts to warm up or cool to ambient temperatures. 5A HPPEALS COt1t1ISSi0?� MEETING, FEBRUARY 17, 1987 PAGE 5 Government requirements also require security. Some of our other customers also require confidential agreements on their parts." C. ADNIf�ISSRA7IVE STAFF REVIEW: In 1975, Kurt t4anufacturing was granted a varance that allowed them to increase the maximum lot coverage allowed under the Code from 40 percent to 47.51 percent. The petitioner is now proposing to enclose a 142 foot by 19 foot over- hang located along the south side of the westerly half of their existinc� building. This long overhang section is currently being used for out- side storage, so enclosing it would not reduce the number of existing parking stalls. However, enclosing this section would increase the lot coverage percentage on the property owned by Kurt t4anufacturing to approximately 49 percent. They do have a long-terr� lease with Burlinaton Northern on a GO ft, by 360 ft. (21,600 square feet) strip of property located adjacent to th�^ west property line which holds 100 cars and which Kurt tlanufacturing has paved, curbed and striped. If this leased parcel were to be added into Kurt's overall lot area, the lot coverage percentage would fall to approximately 44 percent. Mr. Clark stated the Commission members had a copy of the terms of the lease with Burlington Worthern for the parking. The lease wa� for an indefinite period of time with some kind of cancellation clause in case Burlington Worthern ever wanted to use the property. Kurt t�anufacturin4 also has another lease, a five year lease, for the property to the north for 35 parking spaces. So, Kurt �lanufacturing has provided enough parkin� on their site or leased sites to accomriodate their needs. Mr. Clark stated that as mentioned in the staff report, if the railroad leased parcel was added into Kurt Planufacturing's overall lot area, the lot coverage would fall to 44 percent which would be less than what they were allowed in 1975 . 14r. Clark stated the area behind the building has a roof over it. When they car+ie in for a building permit, Kurt �lanufacturing was not aware they also needed a variance. They have already poured the footings, but they understand that if this variance was denied, the footings would be covered and they would just continue to use the area as open storage. Mr. Lou Rosberg stated'he believed the roof ar.ea has existed since 1967. That was all supported with steel bear�s along the south side so it was restricted from parking anyway. The idea at that time was to store the castings and materials out of the way and to keep the rain off them. What they run into �iith the magnesiurn was that when it qets wet, �hey lose the castings. Mr. Rosburg stated another problem was pilfering of expensive heavy aluminum castings. They are secured to the railroad tracks with a fence but not so secure that something can't be taken out if someone wants it bad enough. They have had a lot of castings disappear. : APPEALS COt111ISSI0N MEETING, FEBRUARY 17, 1987 PAGE 6 �4r. Rosberg stated with the roof open, it makes for a dirt trap. The wind blows and they get dirt all over the castings. Also birds rest in the rafters and made a mess. Mr. Rosburg stated also with the large castings, it takes days for them to warm up to a useable temperature in the wintertime and also in the surr�nPr they get too hot. Mr. Rosburg stated he has talked to the Burlington Northern about the lease attd what their plan was for the property in the future. They said there was absolutely no value to the property to them except for the rent fror� Kurt Manufacturing. Mr. Rosburg stated they have also opened up a lot, 160 ft.. x 90 ft., for ad�itional parking. By adding this property, it gave them even a lower lot coverage area than with just the Burlington Northern property. MOTION BY 19R. BARNA, SECONDED BY MR. SHEREK, TO CLQSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VQICE VOTE, ALL 'vOTIPJG AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEr1RING CLOSED AT 8:08 P.M. Mr. Barna stated he could see no problem with this variance request. The hardship was well stated. There was an additional purpose in favor of it and that was they would be adding this area as an energy-conserving air lock from the main building, �d the safety aspects of not having to haul large castings on the exterior exposed blacktop floor area. Af far as the green space, they were not changing that. As far as the actual roof coverage, they were not changing that. All they would be adding was a wall around the outside of it. Dr. Vos stated he had looked at the site that day. It was similar to enclosing a three-season porch. The area was covered already, and it was just a matter of putting up the walls. �4r. Sherek and t1r. Qetzold agreed with what had been said and were in favor of the variance request. - MOTION BY DR. VOS, SECONDED BY MR. BARNA, TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF VARIANCE REQUEST� VAR �f87-D2, BY KURT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PURSUANT � CHAPTER 205.18.3, C, Za, OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF THE LOT AREA ALLOWED TO BE COVERED BY MAIN AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS FROM 40 PERCEN2 MAXIMW�! FOR A ONE-STORY BUILDING TO 49 PERCENT FOR A ONE-STORY BlbDING (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR 47 PERCEI7T) , ON PART OF LOT 4, AUDITOR'S SUBDNISION #75, THE SAME BEING 5280 MAIN STREET N.E., FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, 55421. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, C.YAIRPERSON BE:ZOLD DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PLANNI(JG COMI4ISSI0� MEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1987 PAGF 9 Mr. Betzold stated this particular item was on the Appeals Co ion agenda last Week, but the meeting was not held because of a lack o uoruro. He stated they will be discussing it at the Feb. 17th meet' . Preliminarily, he has gotten no objections from the Appeals Commiss' on this proposal. Ms. Sherek stated she liked this proposal be e it addressed a specific pr�blem. The Commissioners were in agreemen, ith the ordinance change for existing one stall garage side yard set s as proposed by Mr. Betzold. 3. RECEIVE JANUARY 20, 198 �NVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMt1ISSI�N MINUTE_S_: 5C MOTION BY MR. TH SON, SSCONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TO RECEIVE THE JAN. 20, 1987, ENVIRONI�I�FTA UALITY COMMISSION MINUTES. UPON OICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED THE MOTION C IED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. OTfiER QUSI��ESS: a. Feb. 17, 1937, Appeals Commission meeting minutes Mr. Betzold stated that because of a lack of a quorum, there was no Appeals Commission meeting on Feb. 3. This meeting has been rescheduled for Feb. 17th, and because of some urgency on the part of the petitioners to move ahead, he was asking the Planning Comnission if they had any objection to the Feb. llth minutes going directly to the City Council without going to the Planning Comnission first to be received which was the usual procedure. He gave a brief description of the variance requests that would be discussed at that meeting. 140TION BY �4R. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY MR. KONDRICK, TKAT THE FEB. 17, 1987, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES GO DIRECTLY 2b THE CITY COUNCIL O.! FEB. 23, 1987, WITHOUT BEING ROUTED FIRST THROUGX 2�'HE PLANNING COMMISSION. UPQN A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BILLINGS DECLARED TIiE MOTION CARRIED UNAIIZMOUSLY. _ �_�� b. CDBG Allocations Mr. Robinson stated the City Council had mad tion to approve the CDBG allocations at their Jan. 26th mee '. There were some chanqes in the 1987 CDBG funding allocati nd the 1989 funding allocations. These were outlined in his . rd memo to Mr.Robertson. Mr. Robinson st also attached to the memo was the Neighborhood Commercia ab Loans Program Guidelines for the City of Fridley dated Feb , 987. � � �� _` ` � I I '��'� �,� : s },, �,; �" � _ �r - --- --- __... rr_----- ----- ., -� �- 1f •. 1 •: , � �� , ., Q •: .N � '�• :•� � o� - . � •: .� / �z-' 3c�' .� � A � �4 , i � �. r � •� r �i V S � — --� ii/ � • i� — •� "� �.. �N �IAOt) �� /? � � [1Af� �46�'+% • � � : .,e. .r � �r ; � (OOO 3) � �, J` ,�1. �� s�3if ' a; � � � i � 3 '. � _ l 2� � : . � � h - �i1 � : � ;,� � /' �� ^ � �' �l0) �•to� ,0 � ` ° 'OL.0 � 8b � .� . � 4 .titi � <ir9J) h ' 'f��o a �� „A � V ; , �, '''� / � � � l : � 0 ., � o , �� N� O � a . °, � : � 4 'y ; � , _ i � � �' � �� 0 � ' '3.� >t� �` �.� _- �NN '• ; � �,� .� U1 �� , a ......,�,,. � �•`.�5 OR.'•''�. ..� - r� r- . , ; . . � i.. ' '" �� . � �i r` _� �. . � i: � � . :. � � j _. _ . _. _ . _ _ _ ,_� .�........ 5392T �/�'�� /d� i H v. �. i�� co ------�— ' (4 ; (�o.!►TJ i E/rst�i C��Irtw i N.E. G�DRNER SEC.If ........ ,........ :•:: •::.:, ........ ,........, .: : :•: : •. '::.�.�:.1 ':::::::.; ::•.�::.: � ........ ,........ ........ �.��• •��• �iiii � i�ii � � �i i i i i i i i a � �i � i�iiiii � � � � � � � � � � • • � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � • �i i�iiiii • �: : • � : : : • ��iiiiii • i�r ��i �� i� • ' I . . I . .�, .' . . . � • . .I , . •" , , . I I ,<;�' � : � � ; I ,�,►a.�.�. c.�.•.r . . � : I . � � � - . " ' � I � , , � ��ew � �. . . . o i �,� �.,�r �• ' .. � •. • � . . � � .......�t�tr'....... : . •. ... _. �� . _ .. . • � LOCAT�(��i: � . : . - - - l , -. � � -.�,9. __ �. , . ;� � ,a��.. � � N . 5E . .o, �/".� C.0 Snni�O,-, ew -• i ..,,� . " .>� . . oi3...'t'a . �� '.�.:a� 4l�:... 1'l�. COAI • � �0. p S% ` � � ""S`: � � '�,✓ �" .,. � � � � � Z �4. L � ^ . .•' , 'r �„� �d^�+�' : �� . ; �; ,�.�. y - . Z ,� " . ,t.. . �t � ,- e , . , . y ,� G .. . . O y} _, '' , � : � .. . ..c' . � ��'P . v� .:r *�� 'y�`.s . . . I.. ' i f � �,�R'� • 1 � '. � wt: �y / �� . � : � , � � ) Y'Y�✓' � � � '. ` � , � �, , ,r� �� : . . i� � -. ,i , c � , t° f'Tt�'? �,'� �,3,,? +t .� b, , � • �:, ♦ . Y �hi � 1M� • � 1 . , . ` � - - '�, �; �� " + a1�� . � _ , :-� S O � , .„ � - . . � �r � • .• � � �� ' .. : r . ,t f . � �.r� •'� � �[ �� . � •• . �i-� ""r � 'ic'. '� � r�- '� � '�', ZY+ ,'.L1_ `t__ '� � •�' ' .. . e� , .yTti1V�'IHC...� � Vl\ l� � (/!.'�� .�. . ,''` j .� . � : M� .� v 1 �r �'� � � : b. ,. i; ' w/��vurnoN FRaM . _. � '.. �y: f�- ��+"' '�� v ��~j.; . : • � � �' \OOID �D -1-� �IO . t4 , �' `` : �7}a� � � �,� y� y_ r.�.�-.•--` �t_-+- ;� . -- > - -�- � - `�*'�'' y , . "t,'?' �� 7'.? I`�,'i;�j` ��N��r'i�' - � �1 - s � . � -4 )�� S '�eV�• S q� t._}- �, . �'i ! �i��t��'K�y � � :': t . � �,` � 1. �'��,-+,�� i.i�ffr. ,��is � � , � . 11'+' � -- --- � ' '�' ` ' ' :�:. � : �:� �: t7.1t �� ,,�'� ��'>'� � �� ►: ��y��lu�k �li� , � { , .-f. ..� a .-� � � . r �a �c nG:1- . p �i� TT 'L' � `7 T >`' , J ` � ;f�o5 }�y� � :i �. fj"'�'y" ,,-��i� �� r �,��..• /iaT7tj� � �i'f� �•�1.~ 1 � �.r�. . ___� ---'—-'._' -.'. ♦. t ,. il.� : { � �� y !� _-__... 1 .: �.� ti+. • � � t !r �.�,F,> ' � �... _ _ . _ _ _ . • «ii�'i;' �- /!l.i7 �� ~�lr. , t'�.��`'' • .� ' �� - � � � q O ; . � �� -� � :��a � ��: r • �' . � y �+,~' �.• 1... h :A, �\ �' •�4q `'.G q��.� , � x, ,d .ti � h'� � o �' ti- x � ~.�,f � � � + �p ' � +1 ' p ' ° _ �c��t t ri:, �J ��,�y� F�;- .,"' p . t' • � � , ; ;,;, ;; ,, � �:Y b=. r -,� . ; . � � � . { ! ` ,t � ? � f ,� , ,1 �-� ,�,,. , ' ,---- -- �-r,�- � � % � • ' �' ~�f'� � p \ ' .. ' ,, . , • .. • p� � . '; .. . • " +"� • ; , . . (� i�� /� �5 i �i � � . ' . . . • , . , . . . .0 : ' � , . . - ��,� .. ..O �..w • y . . �9 � �. �' � � . ..s�o �9� � zo . 1�0 , �� r�, ,s�.� - : o . . '. � . � : . �• , . - 9 � ' �� , .-:� : � � . • : �G� �,Qc OS� � . ' : � . , • : . y _ �Q'.�--��'°,�.,-�..�-� '' � „s -.- -- _ '`' •. • • .. _ _ _. _ . _ . _._ _....�y` —.._... �r--�, - ; �c. . . . , C� ��+'� > _ • +; ;'� • � . �'.. ^�. �. �e i:� • , ��r / � "�� LS � � • ' . . • . ' � --� ----------- �' — � �i . � . �. :• .. : :1 i•� ----- `.`.\` `��',- � � • , . .. , � .• . �'C .s� I i � . � �l . / ;I� � • � I \` • / . y1 ; ` . ,� � .."� • - � 1 , � � , � ' ' . . � 1 � .c / , � ` • .. , �C � �s i � Fe»ce i .. � � . �----�- ----.------`--.-- --�-----�---- ---.- ---.---- .--�--�. , -.�=;--. � w�� W/+ne of E .4o'of �o � . � �N` -onf ; , . . i 4 %b•d4P4� � - �,.�....� �„oe -�•-J3 A �--- � � p�� .—�-'--- . . �•T '"_`r—•• o• ievod.vo Eoseinen�� — '-- - --- - �3 y ----------� ----� � . � FT. i?�%a rv� ,f.�..AO�r-�a.� �;;;�� --. �'-. . .r._: s. > e�� a�o�ktoP �woy � - = S� TE M A P -3 .O ' E. /ine �f Lo /1 ond See.?7. „�....�_____--�-�-�,Q-� � / � - - ; - ----- - - - s-�� . . . . . . ---------- �-- -- --- - --- . , ' '"' pIqECTOAATE � OF � PUBLIC WOAKB CITYOF !�/IEMORANDUM FR1 DLEY _ - �: FROM: I�1TE : Nasim Qureshi, City Manager John G. Flora, �Puialic Works Director February 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Mississippi Street Improvenent (ST. 1987 - 4) �'� -,., - � 1�� Fws�-si As I have mentioned in previous memorandums on the above subject, the Cflunty is prooeeding to preFere plans for the improvement of Mississippi Street between 2nd Street and 5th Street this construction season. Included within the project are the City requirenents for water, storm and sanitary systems to supp�rt the redevelopnent of the southwest corner of Mississippi/University Avenue plus the Center City standards of sidewalks, lanc3scaping and boulevards. 7he project is estimated at $531,954.00 of which the City's portion has been identified at $147,859.54. Zhe HRA at their Dearnber 11, 1986 meeting approved the improv�nent and funding for the Mississippi Street project. �e Anoka County Highway Degartment has also indicated that they will install necessary conduits and work with the City and the HRA for the future installation of a traffic signal at a future location to be deternnined by the City in the vicinity of 2nd Street and the Holly Shopping Center. As the City is the agent to enter into Agreenents with Aroka County, it is neoessary for the Council to authorize the execution of the Joint Fowers Agreanent if the work is to be acoomglished. Associated with the improvement is the aoquisition of the necessary right-of- way. �he Cotmty has initiated action to oondemn right-of-way fran RAO, 10,000 Auto Parts and three residential homes on the north side of Mississippi Street. �e County has already reoeived right-of-way from the HRA for the Liqu�r Warehouse and Doc Ryan's garcels at the April 10, 1986 meeting. It is the Coimty's understanding that the HRA will also be praviding the neoessaLy ric�t- of-way f rom the Rice Creek Plaza and the Dai ry Queen paroel. Until these t�ro right-of-ways have been aaqui red, the project canr�ot be vo�npleted. JGF/ts Attac�►ments __ - 6A �'• COy4� . �'�r[s�� ebruary 11� 1987 COU NTY OF ANOKA Deportnie�rt ojKi.ehk•ai�s Paul K. Ruud, Highwc�� £ngineer COURT HOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN. 55432 Attention: John Flora, P.E. Subject: Reconstru�tion of Intersection TH 47 and CSAH #6 (Mississippi Street) Dear I�lr . Flora : As requested by you on behalf of your Mayor and City Council� we have looked at features that could be added to the plans for this project that would improve ingress and egress for local traffic. Specifically we have studied the area of 2nd Street and the west entrance to the Holly Shopping Center as the location for a future controlled intersection. At this time we can provide the following: 1. Installation of a street entrance on the south side of Mississippi Street opposite either 2nd Street or the Shopping Center entrance. The choice of location can be delayed until the project is under construction, if necessary, to see if any re-development plans become available. 2. As a part of the project, the underground electrical conduit for a future traffic signal system will be installed at the intersection that is selected. 3. The County will work with the City and the HRA in the development of a plan for traffic control that can be accepted by Mn/DOT and that can be implemented. , We understand your concern for this type of access and trust that the redevelopment will occur in a time-frame that will facilitate the design of the internal street system and the addition of the necessary refinements to Mississippi Street. Ver ruly you s „ / � r �-e- � Paul K. Ruud� PE County Engineer cc: Paul McCarron, County Commissioner cc: Jim hordiak, County Commissioner ANirmative Action / Equai Opportunity Employe� . : JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR INPROVEMENT OF THE INTEftSECTION AT C.S.A.H. #S (MISSLSSIPPI STREET) AND T.H. 47 This Agreement made and entered into this day of , 1986, by and between the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 325 East 114ain Street, Anoka, Minnesota, 55303, hereinafter referred to as "County," and the City of Fridley, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432, hereinafter referred to as "City." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties to this Agree�nent consider it mutually desirable to improve the intersection at C.S..A.H. #6 ('Nississippi Street) and T.H. 47; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that it is in their best interest that the cost of said project be shared; and, SVfiEREAS, said work will be carried out in accordance with the provisions of :Vlinn. Stat. § 471.59. NOW, TIIEREFORE, IT IS ;VIUTUALLY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 1. PURPOSE The County and City have joined together for the purpose of improving the intersection at C.S.A.H. #6 ('Vlississippi Street) at T.H.-47 in the City of Fridley. 2. VIETHOD The County shall provide all engineering services and shall cause the construction of Anoka County Project No. 02-606-08 in conformance with said plans and specifications. The letting of bids and the acceptance of all bid proposals shall be done by the County. 3. COSTS A. The contract costs of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, normal engineering costs and equipment rental required to -2- l'l�: complete the work, shall constitute the "actual construction casts" and shall be so referred to herein. "Estimated costs" are good faith projections of the costs which will be incurred for this project. The estimated costs are attached as Exhibits A, and incorporated herein by reference. B. The total estimated cost of construction for the project is $531,954.00. Participation in the construction cost is as follows: 1. The City shall pay non-state aid portion of the storm sewer system which is estimated to be 25% of the cost of the storm sewer. The total estimated construction cost is $46,632.00, of which the City's estimated share is $11,668.00. 2. The City shall pay for all water system improvements and the irrigation system, estimated at $11,885.00. 3. The City shall pay 100% of the sanitary sewer improvements for which the estimated cost is $35,385.00. 4. The City shall pay for 50% of the cost of roadside curb and gutter not including the cost of the median curb, concrete driveways and concrete stone paving used in the medians and boulevards. The estimated cast of the curb and gutter is $33,9?5.00, of which the estimated cost to the City is $12,300.00. (a) The City shall pay 100% of the concrete stone paving, estimated at $33,250.00. (b) The City shall pay 10096 of the concrete driveways, estimated at $5,040.00. (c) The City shall pay for all sidewalk which is not replacement sidewalk, in an amount estimated at $4,687.50.The total estimated construction cost for sidewalks is $34,050.00. 5. The City shall pay 259i6 of the cost of reconstruction of the traffic signal system at the intersection of T.H. 47 and C.S.A.H. #6. The -3- . � estimated cost of the traffic control system is $65,000.00, of which the City's share is $16,250.00. 6. The City shall pay 100% of the cost of the lighted sign panels, estimated at $1,440.00. 7. The City shall pay 100% of the cost of trees planted for this projeet. The total estimated cost is $1,500.00. 8. The County shall pay all right-of-way costs associated with the project described in the project plans in Exhibit B, which is a�ached and incorporated herein by reference. If said plans are changed or modified, then the City shall pay the County all right-of-way costs in excess of the right-of-way costs that should have been included under the original plans described in Exhibit B. 9. The City shall pay the County for preliminary engineering services at a rate of eight percent (896) of the actual costs for sanitary sewer and water main construction. The estimated cost for sanitary sewer and water is $47,270.00, with the preliminary engineering fee estimated at $3,781.60. 10. The City shall pay the County for construction engineering services at a rate of eioht percent (8°6) of its actual eonstruction costs, excluding preliminary engineering fees. Total estimated construction costs for Fridley are estimated at �133,405.50, with construction engineering services estimated at $10,672.44. -�- 11. The totel estimated construction cost to the City is � 133,405.50 based on the follo�ving itemized estimates: Water systems Storm sewer Sanitary sewer Roadside curb �C gutter Concrete stone paving Concrete driveways Sidewallcs Traffic signal system Sign panels Trees _ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: Preliminary Engineering: Construction Engineering TOTAL ESTIA9ATED COST: � 11,8$5.00 11,668.00 35,385.00 12,300.00 33,250.00 5,040.00 4,687.50 16,250.00 1,440.00 1,500.00 $ 133,405.50 $ 3,781.60 10.672.44 $ 147,859.54 C. Upon final completion of the construction the City shall pay to the County, upon written demand by the County, the actual cost of construction and engineering, estimated to be $147,859.54. The City's share of the project shall include only construction costs and engineering costs and does not include administrative or other expenses incurred by the County. 4. TERM This Agreement shall continue until (1) terminated as provided hereinafter, or (?) until the construction provided for herein is completed and payment provided for herein is made, whichever of (1) or (2) shall first occur. The City's obligation to supply ongoing electrical power costs will survive this Agreement. 5. DISBURSE:VIENT OF FUNDS All funds disbursed by the County or City pursuant to this Agreement shall be disbursed by each entity pursuant to the method provided by law. 6. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES All contracts let and purchases made pursuant to this Agreement shall be made by the County and City in conformance to the State Laws. 6E � -5- C`l� 7. STRICT ACCOUNTABILITY A strict accounting shall be made of all funds and report of all receipts and disbursements shall be made upon request by either party. 8. SIGNALIZATION POWER The City shall be responsible for the ongoing cost of electrical power to the signal and lig`�tino. 9. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, with or without cause, upon not less than thirty (30) days written notice delivered by mail or in person to the other party. If notice is delivered by mail, it shall be deemed to be received two days after mailing. Such termination shall not be effective with respect to any solicitation of bids or any purchases of services or goods which occurred prior to such notice of termination. 10. AFFIR\iIATIVE ACTION In accordance with Anoka County's Affirmative Action Policy and the County Comrnissioners' policies against discrimination, no person shall illegally be excluded from full-time employment rights in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the program which is the subject of this Agreement on the basis of race, creed, color, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, disability, or national origin. 11. NOTICE For purposes of delivery of any notices hereunder, the notice shall be effective if delivered to the County Administrator of Anoka County, 325 East Main Street, Anoka, Minnesota, 55303, on behalf of the County, and the City 1+Ianager, City of Fridley, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, �t'Iinnesota, 55432, on behalf of the City. 6G -6- 12. INDEMNIFICATION The City and the County mutually agree to indemnify and hold harmless each other from any claims, losses, costs, expenses or damages resulting from the acts or omissions of the respective officers, agents, or employees relating to activities conducted by either party under this Agreement. 13. ENTIRE AGREE;VIENT REQUIREti9ENT OF A WRITING It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the perties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral aoreements and all neootiations between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter thereof. Any alterations, variations, or modifications of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by the parties herein. n -7- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below: COUNTY OFANORA sy: Albert A. Kordiak, Chairman Anoka County Board of Co m m ission ers Dated: , 1986. ATTEST: sy: John "Jay" McLinden Anoka County Administrator Dated: , 1986. Recommended for Approval: By: Paul K. Ruud, County Engineer C1TY OF FRIDLEY �B : � Name Nasim 4ureshi Title Citv Mana er Dated: , 1986. By: Name: William . Nee Title: Mayor _ Dated: , 1986. APPROVED AS TO FUR"�I AND EYECUTION: Assistant Anoka County Attorney 0 6H . :. �. N � , 9 o _Y :� � i 1 �I � �'.t � a'�� O '+ ......._. .. _ ...._ _ �:� J. • �� . 'f r r�---r . �.. -� . �-- y� `'-tT•r'• ` ` / . ,;� • � � �A7 +m .n "xtiwo��r�o�_ _ e i_�.M•CS �79A r0 r;n' l�i Af Aa�n�tiw0� Ch)-� '.tI - . . .� � � ' .... ... . . . . i_. � Y' � �/ � �� _ . �wl � : .__... -��'� i, �T� � _�` �_.. � _ - �� +�f t � ; �� ; ��: ; :�r�'� � ¢�� r �$', � � h � . V � � � �a;. , �j ��` � .; ��- i • rf:��;� �r � ' � I .� ' t� �X= �,. � � x� 3 �� i�asi , � r,� � _ -- -- D I � ' w ! � . v v 1 ' : (• �. � ` - I ( r �j � � J ' y �__ 9 � _ ' � � V f �7+1 � w� k , � �� . �. -�; �� i �I '� '= ai� . � .•, 1� � � '�--�� 'A' �l� � : •� � ��/— — - • i . � • .. •� :� � -�� . �;`� L.�� ; �� .c�'-i �j+ `--' � 'w _'•" . ... I `t�� " iJ . .� � � -� --�-- - __ _ � . n , � . �. . : � � :.. � , r ' � F. . ,. � � �e I � �+ , � :i 6� � , �• ,-- �► CITYOF FRIDLEY DIi�ECTOEiATE OF PUBLIC WOAKS lVtEMORANDUM �: Nasim Qureshi, City Manager G FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director LIATE: February 12, 1987 SUBJECT: Rice Creek Watershed District Ngnagement Plan o•� o °o 0 ��-�.__. -- �� FW87-45 As I have previously informed you, seven engineers representing mi.micipalities within the Rice Creek Watershed District prepared a sample resolution for sulmittal to the RQ�TD as a resp�nse to the City's review of the mana gement pl an In addition to the six gereral oomment statenents, I have added ten items that specifically pertain to the City of Fridley and the RQ�ID plan. We are required to sutanit a response to RQ�TD within a 60-day review period whic�h ends on March 1, 1987. Attad�ed is a resolution with Exhibit A for review and oonanent before formal sulmission to the City Council at their February 23 meeting. JGF/ts Attac�ments 7A � o . >6b0 CIVIC CEN7ER DRIVE TELE PHONE 484-3371 0� ev � v MINNESOTA 55113 February 9, 1987 Me�bers of the Technical Advisory Committee Rice Creek Watershed Management Plan Dear riember: Late last month Z had contacted you concerning inquiries I had received from fellow engineers on various portions of the Rice Creek Watershed Management Plan that is currently in the review process by the cities. A meeting was subsequently held on January 29, 1987, where nearly all of the representatives attended and did, indeed, express a nunber of concerns. Based on those concerns, a committee representing five of the largest communities and five of the smallest communities volunteered to work on drafting those coneerns into a document which each of the cities could consider. A copy of that document is attached for your revie�. It is very important that you and your city carefully review the Management Plan and go on record before the Narch 1, 1987, deadline. This is the official comment period that is available to the cities, and this opportunity should not be lost. The positions taken in the attached document were hased on the findings of the January 29 meeting where the representatives were nearly unanimous in their feelings. Some of these are particularly important and significant as to the way the Watershed Board will implement their plan and in turn require the various cities to prepare their local plans. You are, therefore, urged to consider the attachment and, if possible, concur in its being adopted by your community. The more.cities that can provide a united position, the more likely those positions will ultimately be cancurred with by the board. Thank you very much for your assistance. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, � �/�,�' y. G'��+��'-�'/ Charles V. Honchell Public Works Director CVH:cy Enclosures RF50LUTIDN N0. - 1987 RESC�UTIUN Q"kiCERNING RIQ� CREER WATERSHED DISatICT WATER RESQJIKFS N�►NAGEN�IT PLAN WHERFAS, the Rioe Creek Watershed District has prepared a water resources management plan as required by Chapter 509 by the Laws of Minnesota of 198�; and Whereas, as Fart of said law such plans are to be sent to any city within the district for oomanent as part of the averall review prooess; and WHEREAS, such planning needs to be undertaken in a practical, cost effective, and achi�val�le manner; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has reviewed this plan and finds it to be ger�erally acoeptahle in many aspects with the exception that there are areas of potentially very serious impact on the City, and WHIItFAS, said areas of pc>tentially very serious impact are set forth in Exhibit A entitled RI� QtEE�C WATERSHED RESWRCES MANAGEMENT PLAN, CITY dOMN�NZS. N(�nl, �II2F.E�ORE, BE IT RESCLVID, that �e City of �idley hereby advises the Rice Creek Watershed District that it finds the Water Resource Management Plan to be generally acceptable with the exception of several areas of p�tentially very serious impact as follvws arx7 more explicitedly detailed in Exhibit A: 1. Water quantity implenentation 2. Water qual ity protection. 3. Overall mar�ag�nent of the Rioe Creek tr�k system. 4. Duplication of effort with other agencies. 5. Hic� implenentation a�st. 6. Ditch modification restrictions. 7. Various city specif ic itens. BE IT EUR7�IER RESCLVID, that the City Engineer of the City of Fridley is hereby instructed to send this resolution expressing the City's serious �noern to the Rioe Creek Watershed District before March 1, 1987. PASSID AND ADOPl'ED BY 7�iE QTY �TJNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS L�Y OF , 1987. WILLIAM J. NEE - @g1Yt�R ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAFf�LA - CITY Q,E�2K 3/6/1/4 : TC EXHIBIT A RICE CREER WATERS�D WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN CITY CONIl�lENTS 1. ITEM Management implementation strategy concerning water quantity (Page V-15). PROBLEM The Nlanagement Plan states "The local water management plan nust demonstrate that for a 100-year return frequency rainfall event, the rate of storm water runoff leaving the municipality will not exceed the rate storm water runoff leaves the municipality in its undeveloped condition." This strategy creates a much higher goal than the current strategy of required new development to have storm water runoff rates equal to the existing condition. Developed municipalities will have difficulty attairring this goal in a cost effeetive and environmentally sound manner. Municipalities will need to purchase additional land for ponding. Trying to reduce outflow rates from a muncipality is a laudable idea, but it is too idealistic. CITY POSITIOIJ The management implementation strategy concerning water quantity should require cities to maintain the existing storm water runoff rates as established per the TR-20 model results referred to on Page III-26 of the Management Plan. New developments and redevelopraents shall have storm water runoff rates equal to the existing condition. If opportunities are available, redevelopments shall have storm water runoff rates equal to undeveloped condition. The problem statement in the plan should bs more detailed and stated more concisely. The plan shall then recommend a solution to the identified problems. 2. ITEM Water quality protection and pretreatment approach (Page V-18). PROBLEM Water quality control and/or pretreatment objectives are too stringent. It will be difficult to achieve from an ei'fective environmentally and fiscally sound approach. Quality control and/or pretreatment before all protected waters and wetlands is iapractical. Present RCWD rules permit use of public wetlands as a method of pretreatment. CITY POSITION The RCWD plan should identify and prioritize which of the water resources are of greater public benefit. Sometimes it may be necessary to permit trade-offs to provide proteetion of a greater publie benefit. Use of an existing wetland may be the most practical and cost effeetive method of pretreatment to protect the more significant resource a of downstream lake. The plan must be flexible to recognize and permit quality control and/or pretreatment methods which protect the most critical resource. 3. ITEM OveraZl management strategy of the Rice Creek trunk storm sewer system (Page V-5). PROBLEM The plan as submitted does not identify existing distriet trunk problems nor establish a program or commitment by the Rice Creek Watershed District Governors to correct and nanage the problems. CITY POSITION a. The Rice Creek tdatershed District Management Plan should use the TP,-20 computer run on the existing development and projeeted year 2,000 water quantity conditions. Any development or redevelopment within the distriet would then be required to satisfy the existing condition in Water quantity design. b. The plan should then speciffcally address the identified flooding, erosion, and quantity problems providing the time frame for identifying the most economical and cost effective solutions. c. The Rice Creek Watershed Management Plan aust then identify the trunk system within the district (recommended outline attached). This trunk system then becoaes the specif3c responsibiliiy of the Rice Creek Watershed Board of Governors for correcting and managing in the plan. Provisions should be incorporated that provide for the district governors to coordinate and faeilitate maintenance, repair, and construetion of improvements for r.on-aainline trunk projects involving two or more muncipalities, if requested. 4. ITEM Responsibilities of regulatory agencies and how t�ese agencies will interface with Rice Creek Watershed District (Page V-u6). -2- 7D 7E PROBLEM Proposed Rice Creek Watershed Plan and proposed Plan Implementation Budget may reflect duplication of activities in areas relating to regulation, planning, enforcement, and capital expen�itures of current agency programs ineluding the following agencies and current program. a. DNR--wetland management, shoreland protection, flood plain management, ground water protection and fisheries management. b. PCA--septic system regulation. c. SWCD--sediment/erosion control. d. LCD (Lake Conservation Distriet)--water quality monitoring, lake improvements. e. MHD/water--potable water supply management authorities. CITY POSITION RCWD FJoard should reevaluate and clearly define its role relating to water quality/quantity matters to insure that RCWD programs and resultant expenditures do not duplicate current activities of other ageneies more qualified to deal with specifie water quantity or quality issues. Final RCWD Plan should contain an Implementation Plan Budget and list of Management Strategies that have been carefully reviewed by each agency to insure current programs and expenditures are not duplicated. When local units of government must work directly with affected agencies to meet statutory requirements or standards, RCWD need not be involved in review capacity. 5. ITEM High expenses to implement the plan (Page V-59 and 1RI-5). PROBLEM The plan includes levels of expenditures for the period of 1986 through 1990 which are too high for the benefit received and do not adequately take into account the impaet these increased costs will have on the property owners. The plan is not well focused to solve identified criticall problems and prioritize the available resources to address such problems. City costs to complete the local plan by the January 1, 1990 deadline will be unnecessarily high due to the short time available. CITY POSITION The level of expenditures should be reduced. The schedule to achieve the goals should be extended to better match the ability of the property owners to pay for the work and to reflect a more realistic timetable for accomplishment after the plan is finally approved. The expenditures should give priority to and better focus on the serious problems of the watershed. The deadline for the local plan to be completed should be changed to three years after the overall Water Resource Management Plan is approved by the State Water Resources Board and copies given to the city. -3- 6. ITEM Aiblic ciitd�es preserved as open channels (Page V-22). PRUBLF�f Open channels are desirabl.e fran �e standpoint of water storage, groundwater recharge, and treatrnent. Hvwever, in sane unchanged are+as, retaining ditches as open channels will be impractical and uneconomical for development and detrimental t�o the health safety and welfare of the oanm�mity. CITY P0.SITION �at the Rice Creek Watershed District plan prwide for the tepla�nent of open c�aruyel ditc�hes with enclosed drainage system where oonditions warrant. 7. ITEM Locke Lake PRDBLEM Locke Lake DNR �2-77p is a 23 acre lake located in the City of Fridley i�nediately east of East River Road. Rioe Creek flaws throuc� it 7he lake is only shown and identified or�oe in the Rioe Creek Watershed District Plan. CITY P06ITION Locke Lake should be iIx'1 uded On r�►P5 1� 2� 3� 4� 5� 6� 7 r 8 r 9 r 10 � 11 i 12 � 13, 15, 16, and 17. In addition, Locke Lake should be li,sted on TABLE 12 page III - 4 as it is a DNR protected water. Locke Lake should also be addressed within the Subwatershed 16 information on page IV - 19. - �he City supp�rts the capital imprwement project for sediment removal fran Locke Lake as noted in section VIII. Of particular ooncern is the districts rational to special assess a portion of this impravenent and only upon a City petition while a similar project affecting Long Lake is accompl ished by the District with an ad - valorem tax levy. Locke Lake should be dredged as a District maintenanoe action using District wide f�mds. -4- 7F __ 8. ITEM Recreational Parks .•.�: 7here are three parks located within the City of Fridley limits that are not oorrectly identif ied in the plan CITY P0.SiTI0N MAHpNp1�N FARK - An Anoka County Park is located on Rice Creek. �is park should be identif ied on N�PS 5 and 7. DUt�S FARK - A City natural site located on the rorthwest end of the west basin of Moore Lake. ZY�e park is shawn on MAPS 5 and 7 but is too large and disprop�rtionate to the lake. 4�MNUNITY PARK - A City multiuse park located west of Hic�way #47 and adjaoent. to the Anoka County regional trail. �he park is ommited fram N�,PS 5 and 7. 9. ITEM Contamination Sites (II-39) . .,� : �e Plan addresses oertain gro�mdwater �ntaQnination souroes within the City of Fridley that are not properly noted. CITY P0.SITION MAP 10 indentifies the Lyndale and Slst dump as item 29 located in Fridley. �is area is not within the City limits . 'Ihe Medtronics, National Pble and Wood, and ONAN sites (31, 39, 41) are listed as potential souroes of groimdwater o�ntaanination 'fie Natior�al Fble and Wood site is aomp�sed of the current property owned by Medtronics and Onan. With h1PC� appraval Onan has cleared its property and constructed a buried vault while Medtronics has renoved contamintated soil from their property. As a result of these actions, it may be more accurate to use the term possible rather then potential as it relates to these properties. �� 7G 10. ITEM �20 Computer MQdel (III-12) -�'� � �. 7H �e plan outlir�es the �t 20 oomputer model capabilities and capacities within section III but does not pravide detail data on the Rice Creek Trunk Systen. CITY P06ITION Properties within the City experience flooding f rom Rice Creek. The TR-20 model is capat�le of oomputing peak discharae, times of occurance and water elevations at ariy desired cross section or structure. It is therefore desira4le to have the plan provide specific details on the existing flood problen areas and future flooding problems so that they are identified and appropriate vorrective actions included in the capital improvement portion of the plan. It is also desired to have the flvws identified at the municipal boundaries with time of concentration information so that design parameters may be established which will reduoe or eliminate additive conditions and maintian acoepta4le flows throuc�i critical creek sections. 11. ITEM District Storage Capacities (IV-10) . .,� : � The management goal is to reduce flooding but the objective to provide additional storage capacity in TABLE 21 A-2 only identif ies this pol icy for f ive of the 24 subaatershec�s. CITY POSITION �he district should establ ish a pol icy and management goal to prov ide and maintain sufficient retention and detention facilities within the Rice Creek Systan to insure desicg� rainfall events, snaw melt and spring rains will not exoeed the individual critical section capacity, or contribute to downstream f lood.i ng. Major existing facilities should be returned to design volume and then maintained at that capacity. Detention within the major trunk system should be established to eliminate cunulative r�off effects. Procedures should be established then operated by the District to insure facility outlets are c�ntrolled to eliminate downstream flooding in critical crossections of the trtmk. � 12. ITEM 71 Sub-Watershed 16 - La�aer Rioe Creek (IV-19) ''�'- - Zhe requirement to prevent loc�li.zed flooding and additonal storage facilities (objective A1 & A2) are rat identified tor t3�e subwatershed nor are, Moore Lake and the Locke Lake dam mted. CITY POSITION Objective A1 aryd A2 should be 1 isted as gol icies for subwatershed 16. Major ooncerns within this subwatershed are elimination of recurring flooding and bank erosion as well as maintaining the integrity of the Rioe Creek stream c�anr�el. As the Rioe Creek stream parallels the Anoka County Regional Bikeway/Wal kway and canoe systen, the Watershed District should also coordinate with Anoka County to enhance the recreational opportunities within the subwatershed as well as the City of Fridley in its management of Moore Lake recreational facil ities. 13. ITEM Objective C 13 A Minimize Public Expenditures to Control Ru�off (V-3) PROSLEM The Policies for objective A do not clearly define the District's responsibilities or actions to control runoff at minimum �st. CITY POSITION An analysis of the existing retention and detention facilities in relation to critical flooding an�d erosion areas is required. Then appropriate action by the District Governors to obtain additional facilities and/or maintaining existing facilities to prevent flooding fran stotm rtmoff events is required to be def ined. Existing outlets f rom major system facil ities should be controlled by the District to insure rainfall events and water level conditions are properly monitered and managed over the entire truck. � -7- 14. ITEM Waters of Regior�al Sic�if icanoe (V-12) . .,� : Moore Lake is one of the urban resources used for swimming and recreational purposes. CITY POSITION Moore Lake should be listed as a water of Regional Sic�ificance. �his lake has been appraved for Federal Clean Water f�mds. �e state MPC�1. �NR and City have expended in excess of 1 million dollars in water guality impro�venents. 15. ITEM Water Quality Implenentation Stratec� (�-15) . .,� : �e plan requires the mu�icipalities to prepare oanputer models to define 100 year return f requency rainfall events and runoff rates to an undeveloped condition CITY P06ITION The Distxict has prepared a TR-20 model for the entire system. This information should be pravided to each m�micipality to use in cieveloping their local water management plan rather then expending f unos for a dupl icate prooess. �ie undeveloped condition criteria is not realistic or economical. The criteria that should be used is the existing condition as of the District computer run and then allaw any municipality'to satisfy those existing conditions or improve then if practical and possible. � 7J 16. IZEM 0 Water Quality l�bnitoring - Strea�ns (V-28) . .,� :�' Maintaining 22 stream stations 9 times per year is an expensive proposal especially if the samples are not obtained during the first flush for each rainfall even� CITY POSITION - While strea�n quality data is ber�eficial, depending on the rainfall event, time, location and area circunstanoes, the results will very vonsiderably. Periodic samples from various geographic or land use locations should suffice to estahlish a t�ase for oomparison and quality reviews at a oonsiderable vost sav ing. � 7K � w c � a � w � p W� � (� Z � � a`L. � � U W � � {�l.� � � Z W � � oac Q Z 3 � � Qc C . . �::i"_ _, , . � • {. ._ . ...�T:;.. ■ "� • O •��: � •; � - d Y �� .. , Z � r L � .V. .V.. « �L • � 0 � V d.m„ ,, r :.i � � � � � � c'n �'n � c� a�i ¢ Ot - � _' N r a � , � �i��iL �� y W a N ^ � � a s � o ; � � � �� _< d ^' uJ 3 ........... ....� . � . . ' �. . . ... j.i C..... � �� - . ....� � �e .......� . %�•. . ; : • � �.....� �i : a 1 : :�p �i.• �.........� . ....... tg �. • . P . 0 O C°� �, -; : �`- � C....... ... ; 4 � .. � �a . ...i ji �■..� • �• -�' p, l+ � � m �1 • c�'�� es ' .{ • � � � •�, � . s ` i� �� ■ ��■ .._.._ � �4� � / :� i �� __ •"", Z� si �� , ��,M,.;.. . . . . � , ; . •• ' R � , • �• ' .�. " �� _ _ _ • " O ^ �t ■ � �� . _ :.�.._ _ �'�� t�� • • � � ; O ' O '-! O • . �+ ��.� .�-C � n •c.r.�;•. , ... �� ■ � ... ..... . ..., r•'�' :c.• ' • � ,� 'T � �� ... �� a . _ .� � .s ; - r, -; � { � � ��i: O 3 _ ��; ��=� 0 O -..., , � --_, ' i• ty+j � s� ef i'; _�.�' �� j ��3 i " �� ... �'•�..._ - � ' i -.. .'. ..,.. • � , �` _•_ . �� . �� ;� i ■�� i+ O ; Q N ,: � � • 7 .. .�� •�� .. . .. - .. �� • � � � lS.: ' �J �/• � � �.. �. ^� ! � Y � •�/��/�♦ _� -� _ ' , _. Z • ; i� e - �/ � d � I � i�• ��- - �---- ,�•�` L�— �" s •/ o �- 1 � � �� . -��= �- � :• �b d � ;�� i�- =, ` , ■... t::;:.. /� ; � , �� ,. . ' -.. � - \\ �:J it� _ /A. �. . .. " . ��— � � � Ji_ ' �P �Y :.; . •s -�-.t� iT� � /s� ' Y �� ■ . � � �• • 1�1 � •O � � _ E� .. ,f• : ,. ..� ..._. �� Q... �� • � Q� � ��• ■��',._ � ' .� - �� • 1�� •� . . ' • ��` � . �,�� -_ •_. ��■ ,�� y � O �� : � � a{ ff ` 1 � � 4i� • ,�� ` i�.. �... . . ° •((i/,�. ',.'�/� .� : �� •• � , •.. . ', ' • • 3- .r� � RFSCGUTION N0. - 1987 RESC�,UTmN REEUSING �IE ME7�DPOLITAN WAS'I'E O�NTROL QOMMISSION' S (M�TCC) SF�tVICE AVAII�ABILITY Q�IAI�E (SAC) RE'�FUI� PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission had required m�icipalities to oollect Servioe Availability Charges (SAC), and WHERF',AS, the City has �llected SAC for all cnnstruction within its limits, and WHIItEAS, the NWCC has Fassed their Resolution 86-261 apgraving a SAC ref�md program, and WHgiFEAS, the City of Fridley is fully sewered. NCW, �IEREFURE, BE IT RESCLVID by the City Co�mcil of the City of Fridley that the SAC ref�d option authorized by the NWCC will not be impl�nented by the City. PASSID AND ADOPTED BY glE CITY Q7lJNCII, OF �iE CITY OF FRIrGEY �IIS 1]AY OF , 198'7. WILLIAM J. NEE - N�►Y�R ATi'�'ST: SfiIRLEY A. HAAPg1LA - CITY Q,ERK 3/6/1/7 : . � RIETROPOLITAf1 UJAITE COf1TROL C�O� I�fliOfl December 10, 1986 Mr. Nasim Qureshi City Manager City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Qureshi: The Commission, at its October 21, 1986 meeting, approved a change in the Reserve Capacity Policy as of January 1, 1987 to collect Service Availability Charge (SAC) via building and/or sewer connection permits for buildings which have immediate access, directly or indirectly to the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS). This change in SAC collection policy raised the question, "should there be refunding of SAC collected to pay reserve capacity charges through permits previously issued that do not yet have access tdirectly or indirectly) to the MDS?". Pursuant to a study on the issues of refund of SAC to communities, the Commission approved (See attached Resolution 86-261) a refund program. The approved refund program is one where each community can identify all, some, or none of the SAC units which are eligible for refund due to the change in policy. The approval gives the community the time period of 1987-89 to identify and report the number of eligible SAC units for refund because of this change in policy. The amount to be refunded is an amount equal to that which was paid at the time the permit was issued. To implement this optional program of SAC refund to communities, it will be necessary for the community to identify the eligible units, if any, for refund. This process will require, and not be limited to: information such as the permit number and date it was issued; location and type of building; number of SAC units and amount paid; and the date it was reported to the Commission. We are enclosing a form which will be helpful in identifying SAC refund units should the city choose to do so. It will also be necessary, by City Council Resolution, to request whether all, some, or none of the eligible units should be refunded. If the city elects to have some of the eli- gible SAC units refunded it will be necessary to establish an area which locates the eligible units. 350 Metro Square Building, Saint Paui. Minnes�ta �� 612-222-�� 0 . Page Two December 10, 1986 It may be possible that some communities will not want a SAC refund for eligible units in some or all areas of the community because these areas are scheduled for sewer service in the near future and would likely pay a higher SAC rate at that time. On this basis the community has an option to choose which area, if any, they intend to request refund. The Commission will work with you to answer questions regarding the SAC refund issue at any time. Prior to issuance of refunds it is necessary that you complete the entire list of eligible permits for which you deserve SAC refund. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, _ -��{-C�, � ��-� -�il Louis J. Breimhurs� Chief Administrator LJB:RAO:jlw cc: MWCC Commissioner W. R. Johnson J. J. Hiniker J. M. Erickson R. L. Berg � .� •: OPERATIC�� 66-261 REVISED METROPOLITAN i�lASTE CONTROL COIriMISSION 350 IriETRO SQUARE BOILDING, SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 222-8423 RESOLUTION NO. 86-261 RESOLUTION APPROVING TSE SERVZCE AVAILABILITY CSARGE iSAC) REFUND WSEREAS, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Rate Structure Task Force recommended a change in policy to collect SAC only if central sewez service is available; and WHEREAS, the Commission adopted the recommendations of the Task Fozce on November 19, 1985; and WHEREAS, the Commission further studied the issue of SAC refuncl as recommended by the Joint MC-MWCC "Study of Rate Structure for Service Availability Charge ISAC)"; and WHEREAS, this further "Study of Service Availability Charge (SAC) Refund" examined the fiscal, administrative and legal issues of a � zefund progxam; and WHEREAS, the Commission has accepted the report and held four public information meetings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission approve a Service Availability Charge (SAC) Refund pzogram as recommended in the •Study of Service Availability Charge (SAC3 Refund. BE IT FQRTHER RESOLVED that the SAC refund be made to the communities during the period of 1987 through 1989 with money now available in the SAC fund. Adopted this 21st day of October, 1986. METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION . gy �.. Peter E. Meintsm � Chairman RAO:jlw 10.1.66 REV: 10.22.86 . � ��l?�� By � uf �-� Louis J Breimhurst Chief Administrator RESCLUTIlJN NO - 1987 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT. L. S. #86-0$, ZD QtFATE THREE SINGLE FAMILY LOTS. ONE BEING 'IIiAT F�,,RT OF LO'I5 80, 81, 82 AND 83, BLOCK A, RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS, ANOKA �(JNTY. MINNESO'�, LYING WEST OF THE EAST 90 FEET OF SAID LO`15. �]E SEaOND LOT BEING �iE WFST 70 FEET OF �iE EAST 90 FEET OF L075 80, 81, 82 AND 83, BLOCK A, RIVE�VIQnI iiEIGHTS► ANOKA Q�LIN`T'Y► MIlVNFSO'!A. �iE THIRD LOT BEING LO'15 78 AND 79 AND �iE EAST 20 FEET OF LOTS 80, 81, 82 AND 83, ALL IN BLOCK A, RIVF�iiVIEW HEIGHTS, ANOKA O�iJNTY, MINNFSO'�1, glE ORIGINAt, IAT BEING 441 HUGO STREET N. E. WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the Novesnber 3, 1986 meeting, and the Planning Commission stipulations attached as exhibit A; and WHERFAS, such approval was to create three single fa�nily lots. One lot being that part of Lots 80, 81, 82 and 83, Block A, Rivervi�sa Heic�ts, Anoka Cot,mty, Minnesota, lying west of the east 90 feet of said lots. Zhe seoond lot being the west 70 feet of the east 90 feet of Lots 80, 81, 82 and 83, Block A, Riverview Heic�ts, Anoka County, Minnesota. �Y►e third lot being Lots 78 and 79 and the east 20 feet of Lots 80, 81, 82 and 83, all in Block A, Riverview Heic�ts, Anoka County, Minnesota, the original lot being 441 Hugo Street N. E. ; and wHEREA�, the City has received the requi red Certif icate of Survey f rom the awner; and WEiERFAS, sudl approval will create three residential building sites. NQ�T, gIERF.FORE, BE IT RESU.VED that the City Council directs the County of Anoka to reoord this lot split within six months of this approval or else such appraval shall be null and void. �,SSID AND ADOPrED BY �IE QTY �NCIL OF ZHE CITY OF PRII7I,EY 7HIS L1AY OF , 198'1 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATi'FST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPI�I,A - CITY Q,ERK 3/7/3/11 � 9A E�IIBIT "A° DIV 7S IUN 1 RFAi, ES�1TE L. S. #86-08 STIA)LATmNS 1. Pravide a 17.5 foot street and bikeway/walkway ease�nent along East River Road (Docuaent executed on February 2, 1987). 2. Provide a 12 foot street easement along Hugo Street N.E. (Document executed on February 2, 19871. 3. Lot area varianoes are appraved with split from 9,000 square feet to +/- 7,165 on Parcels B and C. 4. Lot width variances are appraved with spl it f ron► 75 feet to 70 feet on Parcels B and C. 5. Park fees of $750.00 required for each of the three lots payable with building permits. 6. Reo�rd lot split at Anoka Cflunty within six months of Council appraval. 7. Owner agrees to appl.y for property to be rezoned to R-1, Single Family, prior to reoording lot split (Application made on Februarv 18. 1987. CA/lVE � ASSOC/ATES --� - L AND SURVE YORS, /NC. /7720. Nighwar 65 NE. - Soiorervi/A�, Mi�rneso�o 55304 434-7646 a N1 l . � i::?; IFICAYr nr g•��r�y FhR: PC1 ChO::i7�Z3 1.i:;.:;, D�SCP.I?'_^InCS: Parcel A: That n�rt o.° Lot� 3�, 91, E2, and 83, P.loc� A, RiVER �'I�':•�i!F.7�HTS, Anoka COUnty, Minnes�t�, 1�•in� west of the Past 9�.0f+ _°cet of s�i9 Lot�. :,nc], nll th�t part o,'. the unnameci atre�t 3hu�tin�7 Lots 30, 81, 37. and 83 1•�irn� between tt�e Southerl�• line of Lot 8� cxt�n�:e.: �:esierlv to"the K1C 'tailroad and the ':ortherl�� linc of L.�t e�3 extenc;ed P:esterlt to Lhe 'taC Railroad right of way, as shown on the oriqinal map of said�?ivPZ V1PY !ieiqt,!a ndditioa. Ar.d, all that �art of the riqrtt o°_ %:�•� of tT:e °inne^^oli�, 4noka and Cu�vna Ran4e Railroad Company in the Southe�st ouarter of the vorthwest nuaztez of. Section 3. 'fowns!�in 30 'dorth �rnrte 24 ::est lyinn t,etwecn th? `:o:th line of Lot S3, Eloc� �, also �n^•.:r. a= Sectior. n, ?ivc: t'iew 4eiaht.s, extende3 :veat t!:rouqh said rivht of way and said South Jine of Lot 80, 31�ck 4, Rivc+r "ie�.• t!eiahts, e:;tended 'iest thzour.h 537d riQht o' •:•a�• 3ccnriir^ !� t*� ^.lat t!�=reof �n file and of :ecor3 in the o:fice of the rountv Rer_o:cier in ar.: :nc A.nn`:. �'ount�•, 'tinnesota. Subject to easementa for street and utility aurposes ovez the aouth 12.00 feet thereof, and also over the west 15.00 fee: thFre�f. Parcel B: The west 70.00 feet of the east 90.0� feet of Lots 80, 81, 92, and 83, Rlock A, RIVF.R VIEY' fiCIGH:S, Anoka County, Minne�ot:+. Subject to an easement for street and utility ourpo4es over the aouth 12.00 feet thereo�. uarcel C: Lots 78 and 79, and the east 20.00 feet of Lota 80, 81, 32, and 83, all in Block A, RIVERVIEh HF.IGH?S, Anoka CounCv, Ninnecnta. �ub�ect to an easement `oz streM an3 utilit�• our�ocPF over the south 12.00 feet \ t^�re�°. ` ' I 1 \ , � �YB9`59 39`Ir ` `1 _ ---/!' D_C--. _ 70 0G _ 70 0iD y� � � . \ � � , � ��-. �9� `� , r , ` - % I \` `�,� � n1 �t,��--- ----- -- � -- — I t1 f ;_ � , = F` �'� �' ,�, � _ � . / 1 �a - ` v..� �� .. �►♦ �\•, "� ` , , `' , �-� - � — --- -- --- —• � -- � � --- �9 ' '' � �O '7'7 � �� `' _ C_ , � 2 I + On : i � '•^. � j ;> c� -�� i �y� � VI � i � -�v, _ .♦ � T� r,�1 � a, S; � Q .� � ♦• � ,� `� 1 '. Cl ��' ---._ ,.� _ _ Cp � :'1 �` > ' O O � ' � � �� -� ; � 4- � -- — : -- — — — -- I � ti �1 -> ' '� ; "L—i`� f------�—- —�r-----�.�=_ /}7Zerc--i --'- 1 �� ? �S+it¢1'w �r.l�tr � E�stm..? � 1 80 X. ' � ` fST _ • ` _ 70.00 ' ' �, � h'UG'� STiPE-�T * � �� ` � ;, ; ;3 � � , , SGLE•• / /MGY/=�J FEE7. a DEIMDTES //P IYCM /RAM R'PE SE7. •QEMOTES AN pPA�Y �IAM/NE'N� fDUiYO �EA�i/A�GS liMGM'N ARf fXOw ASSUMfO OA�t/M. � wIKI� f0IIi1 1Mi► 1MK f4M[7 /t��{ M KMI/ wlf MlAM[O I� �[ M MK�► ir OIr[� t��MYdOr �.p r�t � 1yr • war ,rrmw�o �.ae awtro�► ��crw rwe aMS er /K I�il[ e� r.rFSesi. � • �� y)_ - v � a..� fe b. � �; �,:� .�a wo. , , J ...�_,«� .��,. .f- ...�:��:.�; � :.. his home, and the buyer or mortc$ge o�mpany was aware part of his garage wasn't on 's pcoperty, it would be a problen. rDT�DDN b� �u�ilman Schneider that if the lot spl it prooeeds for 6 342 & 6314 Baker Avenue, ctie to the encroachment problem, the fee for the lot splft would be waived. Seoonded by Qouncilman Goodspeed. Up�n a voioe vote, all v�otting a�e, l�iyor Nee declared the motion a�rried unaninausly. � B�. A reaess was called at 11:15 p�m. by l�yor Nee. ;_},��,�►/�I�N1� Mayor Nee reoonvered the meeting at 11:30 p.m. All (buncil me�nbers were pr esent. * ?M. �/1�. 4�! �� ►i /4 . � Y• ' : �!J �. �1� V V � � �. � �. � ��V\� � + •.. ��A 1� _ �: Y ��► • ; �JO±' �.�11�. � a� i7�y ,�:; � �� ;��v �.�! �:�.M � Q� : � 1� � ti`f�t: : +� : �+�i�>> �l .� y i �..1�+ �. �� ,� y4C! .M : i: :�4v��!�1 .,14�- �!�'►!�:; • . M}� :�. /ti• �. 4� . />,i ! .! .�I �� :�1�� :��Yy : /�!►. ) : � � ,!,;�V. �� ;,� . /�'�; � =i �1�/�+:�'fY� ; / � �1 � : . :�. : 4 • � • �• r • - • • _ . • - • . a• - • • - •- -�• •-• • �• i •��_•--• •• • • • • • - - • - - • � • • - • i . • ti ��.+. �� .: �� i ��'�_ � .. : . � �! ��4� i: ��, ?'-�I�: 4 . �� i� � : 4�!� � '.�/K ;� �� 4r : I�!�l ! �! .� �i :�)�I�!�ti 1/ . l��l 1 ND'I'ION b�r O��ciluan Fitzpatrick to set the public hearing + plat for Navenber 17, 1986. Seoonded b� O��mcilman Gocxlspeed. vote, all vating aye, l�yor Nee declared the mation carried �m ��i� !�<�!:: y ! � �� !/ '}� 4 : . � : �� M: : 4 4;i;i� �h ' : �� ir � � ..U� � «; : �I�!�/ a. �! t�11� 4:!. : �i_ = �. ,l r• �4� �!�± � =f � �I y �� :�rc y►': k . 1,. this f inal itnn a voiae !�. R�bertson, Qoam�nity D�velopnent D�irector, stated this is a request for a Iat split in or3er to create three single family lots. 8e stated there was an ap�pcaved plan for multiple development on this site several years ag� which never pcooeeded. Ae stated the property is locc�ted on the nottheast �rner of Aug� and East River Road and has two zoning classifications, R-1 and R-3. ee stated the property to the north is zoned R-2 and the neic�borhood is mostly single fanily hanes. -15- 9C 14 . . � �� 1�./1� „��I�VM1�. �.' �!.�"+'r��.�!i �L��j Mr. R�bertson stabed if the lot sptit is approved, varianoes are needed on � I�rcels B and C to reauoe the required lot area from 9,000 aquare feet to plus or minus 7,165 square feet and varianoes on these h,ro p�raels to reduae the required lat widths fran 75 to 70 feet. Mr. Robert5on stated the Planning Commission preferred not to give a rea>mnendation, based on the action the O��cil had taken on a lot spl it on Old Central, and questiored if this was a similar case. He stated he felt the differenae in this case is the area has al ready been platted and the Fattern for development is set, �+hich was not the wse involving the other 1 ot spl it. Cb�cilman Fitzpatrick stated there have been several proposals to develop this property and this�is the least intensive use of the land. I�DTION b� tb�ncilman Fitzpatrick to grartt lot split, L S. #86-08, with the follaaing stipulations: (1) a 17.5 foot street and bikeway/walkway easement be pcavided along East River Road; (2) a 12 foat easement along Hugo Street be �wided; (3) lat area varianoes are granted from 9,000 to glus or minus 7,165 square feet on F�roels B and C; (4) lot width varianoes are granted on �raels B and C frcm 75 to 70 feet; (5) park fees of $750 are required for each of the three lats payable with the building pern►its; (6) lot split is to be reoorded at Ar�ka O�u►ty within six months; ar�d (7) the owner agrees to apply for rezoning of the property to single faJnily, &-1, prior to remrding lot split. Eurther, in �nj�ction with staff recommendations, the follvwing shall apply: (1� the paroels shall be�ne three separate tax p3roels; (2) a replat or registered land survey is to be sudnitted, if this lot split cannot be rewrded at the ��nty by a simple legal description; and (3) sewer and water lateral and tap assessnents shall be paid. Seoanded by Councilman Barnette. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NDTION by Councilman Barnette to reveive the minutes of the Planning Connnission meeting of October 22, 1986. Seo�nc7ed b� O�uncilman Schneider. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. rD2'ION b� O��mciln�._Schr�eider to reaeive the minutes of the CATV Advisory Oannission meeting of"October 23, 1986. Seoonded by Outncilman FYtzpatrick. tlpon a voioe vote, all vnting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried �animously. � � A. �NSIDERATTON OF ALIACATION OF F'RANQiISE �'EE ZCl F�OLW: Mr. I�t, Assistant to the G�ty Manager;,.stated the Cable Cbmmission had rewmmended 538 of the franchise fee be a2located to the ACCW, with the feeling the CYty c�uld draw on the interest of -the capital outlay fund to meet the City's fuzding of 60$. , Mr. Qureshi, City Manager, stated a focmula was devised several years ag� in -16- � � __ _ _ _ . - _.__ c2�� «� f a-e,d�"� ��> ✓ �, ,� 9 8 ? �� ,� ;o � �-° : = L.s. #s6—os 9E =` � Division 1 Real Estate �� ► � e3�REET , . : ? :s �� o �,o ,. � �� A� , . ,. ; , b �� ' � ; ) 3 ,� � cM �` �.� i ,�� 4 � ,. � ' � � � ;� % �K ' r � •"' r� Ao i .i � y O O � '3 Z ir �� 9` � „�� ,5 0 ;o a / �%� ' �5 � v� , ° ° CITY OF ' ,. . s , � S�e�� `°�N 3 " � __C00N RAPiDS-� --,,;J.1�----- ,```,1� S „� 0 7' � _ � A � `.`�' L:.-•- :�.� -._. -cee.ts'--••- ; � L • -ie:o ts'•-•- � I ' 1 � � N .'I _., -- Bi0.29= - � l � �. . '-• •iifl�'... ' s �4S B.a � �� i c Ee �c � '� � , � , ,e 9` � e �� z�%> CIiY ; �' .... � -, � s zs ` 3° ° , , � �, �9,�� , RI�LEY F � �`/ ' ^ ��a , �� o��-..._ ,� � `; � � �� '3 2 � � O 9 � � ` ' e s�p / � � '� „ .: s,s+ ci,�v: Gavoawa(�, � � �i `�G � KF1 �D� V F/ � ��.�a 1 ,, �. , = �. °� � e Z 1 Of�`w �.. 01 ' h � / � � � �0 � j U zss 3sz �.-..� � 9�• ao. iI� I! � �j�,Yo (f/) w w _ � ' (4 ) '� : erv�f i 3� Eu, oz �i �= l � cG„ „� _ �.i� (� � 3 ` � 0 � 1 S ,w. ' R / . � i . ;79.° .ti • 4 � 1 � � �, � �� ( ) ; i � ) �� 2y i _ 1 ` �w�� • • �� .�� '� �3 i � ' Qa:eld q� E w � 9 � s ` � �i11 7 0 2; �`� 4�) �';' " � 2 � % °- 3 v C.�D..i� �Liitr. � ` � � . w �A �w �� C�%i h A.Eile.p,.� /ii 3� � • �- N �3 �Z // � i � ; ,, �, �� ,�r.� ,�� [�. 'i (�l � ' �rso> �,.' 36 % / �sr 3i9 / `ti ..' /6 � �i � ��f! !l.Ol! - tf. ` ii) It �'/Jt e> � � ! � i • w f , �'' ' °' � W ,� " � „IRON„T�N STR ET s �� R.E� �. � � .� � � � � E s e , y � ,��.,�.� �.e� ;x � x � f � w> ' N %P A„ - � ' CH U/l�l �. , � � � . ,.� ,, _ - °° t� „ ,�s, g� �� 3) ig9 1��`�' �<u� ' 3'�"� �`� y d E�� 3L`Yg� 4 rb .w��.�fS1G ,,r g �+�f i �o+�ar inr "7 9�d i i�'E9 � � r � 9` � i7 'S, ' ~ � / � i'�in � '�'� i S i �c l ` .. 1 ' � Z' �� 7,� s 7 � 7� 7iG / 7� S i` G S ;� o � � i �- �.� \i f i' 1 0 9'g' I • � � � g�� s ��7)2 '� "` zs.n w zr • p ( fi Q► - ti .-3, / . ' _ d' ` . 9 ) '' . , 9 / b '�i� + 6 7 8 9 G i I 1 iI /�' f � t i"� 1! 7 7�i 9 a?i 1) ?3 / � 1 �3 S? "� 'p � i ) _ � _ .- + . S � '�� . _�-:�. =�� • � L -- x; � � a ) )E % Z, �i o ltd � ,•n a� `) 23 • �`;si'i a`;r +^ ,�i ,�j b �M.a�' j s •.< %J e �� `� ) (A �/09 g � �) (1J�) a _:� � 8;31'(sf) / � �J a .t� gIQ� ,,� � ) r3 � > ;� ° �� L �plSl t �, �•. � ' .` � � � 9 � � �� y: � �.�� , : ��- , .�' t "/�� }� t' . , . � it ) ,! o „q .. "� � � . : y4 � . .•» �� c ,. r , RUT 6 '� z Et 6� ° e�«>>z w !,9 FAIF2MON ��1�•�8;ti� ►�i 8��4��: �: �. R�y �� e q gSR e �o � ,� '� � N r�ti+ 3 � �� - �' ' � I s '�- .b a , � " �o� � p �" ,��a � "� "�c�� > �a��o : 8in�.�� y �(g� � . .� 8 ` ) �� $ S 5 b's f � i "811�1 ! (j,: .,� ' � t/i �II) C � `,>>Z 5 �� ',_ .. i 2 S � , "' �P ..� II� � ';� � 5. a �� 3, ` � � � � �f ��> �� i ��l � �� j � 9 � � I . '"�� G s• �4-� �� e � � ��Z Bioy� g�qb � !f°�° ��i.� ��7[� � Lfl/ C 4 5 0 ) ,►��' ` � . ' - D. �� S . 5 ' ' i` � 9 ,�� f sbo�s o ` :.s , : ��ic�.�+ ' •(fl � + 9s ��t f 8 G �j �ii.� -'� • r i.� CIRCLE .,,. �; • • � . � -+,yF 3� , ,'� J�� r ,e.� y II�� '` i''''� "'n � ' R �►�V� i aClf�� 7 .! 3 1 f f�' 1N J.faw � �v�. - vri � ,�.. �• '�r (eu f )'1 / I f � . i r�� { .j, ��• 5�'C//!N - • �YJ l�) �` t• + )f�, \ r , � � ' t w � /�� , ,, �►P►� 2 a,., -. . � • :� � -. - q" � ,�a /�fJ) � . . � . ,� _ ,. y " � ,:�j� ,� `3 BID� ��. � � 804f 9057 807/�� k�OLb�,.,. '� „� . s$!Ol 3 9 , o --• , su�- . / 3so .a -snu�•- ! ( ) � 6� , 'S '3 �p' _� .:•m ;� � � .� � ` S ji �` . � ��I/ o' ~g o , , .�R�- � 24 g , �. LOCATION MAP ,� � � . � - —_ _ _— � _ � � � � � � � � � � i 1U =RolJTO y`�.1 STRFET i � � cQ � `t 30 � (1- plax� � v - -- -- K_ 3 -- _ _ _ _ �_ i-� ., � � �� (�) h g) � _ L L _ _ '� , C$� I �� B N �� ig �/ �6 (S.f �1� i,►,�. _ _ � �_�$I, _.._ _ _ _ --; _ � _ � � � 389 3, �'' (S0) . `��-- -- -- — -- —� -- -- ir►,� � 3i' iW� z5' �' , --- _ , — _ , _ i (9 6 389�') (7t 65 �) �7165 �� 50' ' "' pIqECTOAATE � 0 F °c o � PUBLIC WOFiKB .. �--� ;�-C CITYOF 1VIEMORANDUM � !� FRIDLEY -_ - 0 �7: Nasim Qurestii, City Manager FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director �,TE: February 17, 1987 SUBJECT: Hic�way 65/100 Ztain Intersection (ST. 1987 - 3) FW87-52 With the proposal fran Woodbridge Properties, Inc. to construct the Lake Fbinte Developnent on the old 100 �ain Drive-in site, the FiRA agreed to oonstruct the improvanent of Hic�tway 65 and the intersecting legs of Lake Pointe and Old Central. The proj ect was designed by Short-Elliott-Herdrickson who was retained by the HRA. Estimated cost is $1. 7 mill ion At the F�ebruary 12, 1987 HRA meeting, they passed HRA Resolution No. 2-1987 requesting the Co�mcil to �ooeed with the project and indicating their sup�ort and payment of the aosts. Recommend the City Council authorize the Resolution Receiving the Preliminary Report for Project ST. 1987 - 3. JGF/ts Attachments 0 10A ��,�� Np. - 1987 RESOLUTION RECEIVING 'IDE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND RECENING A RESOLUTION FROM THE FRIDLEY HRA RDQUESTING �E PROJECT AND AU�ORIZ ING RE7I�BURSF�]T �'IDE CITY 1�R �E �ST OF PRQTECT S� 1987-3 . . - . WHERFAS, the oonstruction of oertain imprwenents is deened to be in the interest of the Ci ty of Fridl ey, and wHEREAS, the Fridley Housing and Redevelopnent Authority (HRA) supports the improvement of the Trunk Highway 65 and West Moore Lake Drive/Old Central intersection, and WHEREAS, the Fridley HRA has requested that the City Council construct Project ST. 1987 - 3 and that the Fridley HRA will reimburse the City for the cost of aonstruction by Resolution HRA No. 2- 1987. NCW �IE,REPORE BE IT RESCLVED, tr� the City Council of the City of Fridley as fQllaws: 1. �at the preliminary report suYmitted t� the Public Works Director is hereby reoeived and acvepted. 2. 7r►at the City Qerk shall act to asoertain that the Fridley HRA is the awner of each paroel of land that may be proposed to be assessed for said impravements. 3. Zhat the area proposed to be assessed for said imprwenents and each of then as noted in said agreenent are all of the lands and areas as noted in said agreement. All o� the same to be assessed to the Fridley HRA. 4. �hat the estimates of assessnents of the Qerk shall be available for inspection to the aaner of any parvel � land as may be affected thereby. PASSID AND HDOPI'ED BY THE CITY O�UNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _ L1AY OF . 1987. WILLIAM J. NEE - N4�1YC�R A7.TF�T: 3i IRI, EY A. HAAFI�LA - CI TY Q, E�2K 3/6/9/11 RESOLUTION N0. HRA-2-198T RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE FRIDLEY HOUSING AND RIDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (1) REQUESTING THAT THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TO TRUNK HIGHWAY 65 AND WEST MOORE LARE DRIYE AND (2) APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE REIMBURS�fENT TO THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, ON A MONTBLY BASIS, FOR THE COSf OF THESE INTERSECTION II�ROVEMENTS. WHEREAS, on March 5, 1985, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") authorized the execution oP a contract xith Short-Elliot-Seadrickson for the development of the Pinal plans for the improvement and channelization oP the the Trunk HighWay 65 and West Moore Lake Drive intersection, and WHEREAS, on September 11, 1986 the Authority amended the design agreement with Short-Elliot-Hendrickson to include the detail plans and constructioa of the High�ay 65 widening and West Moore Lake Drive interesection and preliminary plans for the Rice Creek Road Improvements from Old Ceatral to Highaay 65, and WHEREAS, it is noW necessary to commence construetion oP the intersection improvements to meet the obligations for Lake Pointe Corporate Center project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority hereby request that the Fridley City Council aut6orize construetion of the iaterection improvements to Highway 65 and West Moore Lake Drive at a cost not to exceed $1,661,784.40. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority hereby approves and authorizes reimbursement to the City of Fridley, on a monthly basis, for the cost of the intersection improvements to Highway 65 and West Moore Lake Drive. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1987. LAWERENCE COMMERS, CHAIRMAN HOUSING AND RIDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ATTEST: JOHN "JOCR" ROBERTSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR HOUSING AND RIDEVII.OPMENT AUTHORITY � : . P��E O�`v� �P�'E � � � � � � �� i � i ' , ' o � ; ' o` �� i � i � � i i •2 ' � 3 � , � � J � � J � � _ � � � r z 0 z' � ST. 1987 - 3 HIQ-IWAY 65 � Intersection Project � 0 1 Hesvy line - No Parking �--- ----- '3AV NNdWH�tIH � . � �� . � ............ ............ r��■ •��■ iiiiiiiiiiii r ! �� i L �� :�: • � �. . ��a: � � �� ti� i �:i: tiv. � • r:i: r• � �� • :�� : • n � � • �:i: �� •: : , �� • ti�w • cr � •��;•,� i� • r� �: � i �: WHERI'.AS, the State of Minnesota, c�uring the 1986 Legislative Session, adopted a bill as revorded in Chapter 359, Subdivision 2, and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has reviewed the oontrols in place in r ega rd to the Treasurer's function, and WHE�tEAS, an increase in the bond for the Treasurer of the Polioe Fension Fund is required under the State Statutes; Naw, Therefore, Be it Resolved, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby goes on record as approving a surety bond in the amount of $50,000. P�,SSED AI�ID ADOPi'ED BY THE CITY �LINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIULEY THLS LIAY OF ----, 1987 ATTEST : SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLE�tIt WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR 0 11 QTY OF FRITLEY FIDII,ITy B�ID.S EFFECTIVE 1 1-87 Public Officials Bonds City Manager, Nasim Qureshi City Qerk, 5hirley Ha.apala City Finance Director/Treas, Rick Pribyl HRA Treaserer, Rick Pribyl Public bngloyees Blanket Bond *Fire Relief Treasurer, Jim Saefke *Polioe Relief Treasurer, Art Groinus Limit $ 50,000 $ 1,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $400,000 Premitan $ 150 $ 50 $ 225 $ 150 $2,469 $ 525 $1,245 *Bonds �aid for by Relief Associations, obtairied through City Agent, Cornaay Olson 11A �DDN 1�10. - 1987 �ifl'� Ap�tI�ZIIT T� EXPSNDIRURS OF Fi1I�ID6 FOR R�B � � �TA'!'�1 PI�,17B(T WHIItEAS, the Fridley City Council on August 18, 1986 approved the concept of the Mediation Project, and WF�REAS, the Mediation Center would offer mediation servioes to City r�idents that are naw being handled by the court system, the Police Department, the City Attorney, the Public Works Departmerit, or the Planning De�rtment, and W�REAS, this expenditure would vover a twelve mor�th operating period for the Mediation Center, and WHEREAS, the amount of $1,500 would be gaid to Mediation Services for mediation servioes to Anoka Coimty; NGW, ZHE�2EFt�RE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Fridley City Council does hereby approve a supplenental reappropriation of $1,500 initially budgeted in the Fmergency Reserve Fund; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the $1,500 be placed in the Legislative Department Budget. P��SSED AND ADOPi'ED BY TFiE QTY QOUNCIL OF TfiE QTY OF FRII�EY TfiIS DAY OF -- , 1987 WII�LIAM J. 1�E - MAYOR ATTEST : S�iIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY Q,ERK 3/7/8f 3 12 ANORA COUNTY MEDIATION PROJHCT 1323 Coon Rapids Boulevard Coon Rapids, Irin. 55433 August 20, 1986 Mr. Nasim Qureshi, Manager City of IYidley 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55431 Dear Mr. Q ureshi: This letter is to extend to your Mayor and City Councilmembers our sincere gratitude for the resolution of support they granted for the Anoka County Mediation Project at a recent council m eeting. I look forward to hearing also of budget approval of the $1500 we requested for the project"s 1987 budget. To give a partial answer to Councilmember Goodspeed"s concern about the project "s liability - to date there has not been a case in the country about this question and some local projects have dropped their liability insurance due to cost and lack of incidence. I realize this is not an ironclad answer - only the best one I could discover. The project seems to be accepted fairly well county-wide, and I can only hope that my remaining appearances before city councils are as well received. Best regards, _ _ � . � /�,?� .' i' , �� L� �� c j Lonni McCauley Task Force Member cc: Mayor and City Councilmembers 12A � RF5(I,Vr�i NO. 66 - I486 � RESQ�[?I'mN OF SUPPORT P�R ANOE�► QXJN!'Y l�DIATmN PRt37D(T WHFRFAS, the oonoept c� vol�teer mediation is meeting an increasing nunber af conflict resolution needs adnong nei�bors, larx�lords and tenants, businesses ar�d oonsuners, plus citizens and agencies; and WHIItEAS, the Anoka County Mediation Project proposes to offer mediation servioes at no �st to those invalved in a�nflict; and WHk�tFAS, a reaent survey indicated a desire among Anoka Gb�mty m�v►ici pal iti es to use the servioes of a o��mty mediation project for same �r�flicts nah� beinc handled b� police departrnents, city attorneys, public works and planning deFartrnents; NC�7, �-IF�.EFORE► BE IT RFSCLVID BY Z�3E QTY Q�UNCIL OF ZIiE QTY O�' FRIIY.,E� 'Ii1AT the Mayor and the City Manager supports the ooncept of an Anoka County Mediation Project and would support its staff's use of these services when appropriate. PPSS ED A�TD ADOPI'ID BY �i E CITY QxTNCIL OF ZH E QTY OF FRILLE�' �4-1 IS 1 F T f� I�1Y OF /',l'GL'S? , 1986. �� SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY ��,K WILL IAM J . NEE - �►Y�R � 128 12C ANORA COUNTY MEDIATION PROJECT DATE: AUGUST 11, 1986 MEMO T0: NASIM QURESHI, CITY MANAGER -CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMO FROM: LONNI McCAULEY, TASR FORCE MEMBER ANOKA COUNTY MEDIATION PROJECT M�ediation is an alternative dispute resolution process whereby people in conflict can sit down with a trained volunteer and work out their problem using win-win strategies. The volunteer's role is to facilitate the negotiation, remain i�partial at all times, and to help create options if needed.. The concept is not new, even if it is still unique. In 1981 the state legislature made funds available to the Minnesota Supreme Court to establish pilot programs in Minnesota. A Ramsey County Dispute Resolution Center was established and is still operating today. Hennepin County has four community centers. Z am familiar with the project in Brooklyn Center. The Anoka County task force started meeting in May to start deliberations. The task force, by the way, is made up of city managers or police chief from the 8 major Anoka county cities, a district judge, a representative from the Anoka County Bar Assn., Senator Gene Merriam, two school board members, a county commissioner, a business representative, resident and civic organization representative. The goal of the Anoka County Mediation Project task force is to set up such a center for county residents to use as a forum other than courts or other enforcement agencies. The objective is to help people solve problems and also to help relieve congested court calendars and give police departments and cities an alternative resource in solving conflict. You are probably already aware of the type of conflict I'm talking about - you get the phone calls at home or people coming to open mike talking about the neighbor's barking dog, or not cutting their weeds, or junk cars in the yard, or a proposed re-zoning that has everyone up in arms. In other words the type of conflict that's hard to settle legally, but that's just as serious and causes just as much consternation to residents in your town. This is how a typical mediation might work. A police department has had a problem between two neighbors and have a lengthy file going back for years. Finally they call the Mediation Center and ask for assistance. A case worker calls both parties�and gets them to agree to meet to discuss their mutual conflict, stressing that there is no charge for the program. A date is set up at a location fairly close to the parties. Volunteers are assigned to the case and agree to mediate it. When the parties meet the concept is explained thoroughly to them and they agree to abide by the process. Each is then given an opportunity to discuss the conflict and is then asked how they would ideally settle it. Most cases take one session of 1-1 1/2 hours. An agreement is written up and signed by both parties. Follow-up is made within the alloted time to determine success. 5ome expected results might be these. Ramsey County opened 311 cases in 19a5. Of those one-third were successfully mediated, one-half were unwilling to participate ano the remainder were referred to other agencies o: could not be contacted. The average time from contact to case closed was 14 days compared to sor�e of the months and even years now in court cases. Neighbors were one-third of the cases followed by landlord/tenant, business/consumer, domestic and other types of conflicts. w� er. contacte� after mediation 92$ from the Brooklyn Center project said they would use the process again. To determine the potential in Anoka County, a survey was sent to all 15 cities asking them to determine how many cases per yeax they might refer to mediation. Nine cities responded and said that 350 cases per year would be probable. This is what the task force proposes to do: . Set up a non-profit corporation with board members selected from throughout the county. . Set up administrative procedures with appropriate confidential processes. . Solicit and train volunteers - hopefully 25 to start with. . Carry on an effective outreach program whereby the media, police departments, city staffs, chambers of commerce, civic organizations and churches are aware of the procram and are urged to �ake referra:s. i Select mediation sites throughout the county so that sessions can be held as close to disputants as possible. Schools, churches, city hall conference rooms are possible. 12D 12E . Set up mediation cases before a county organization is up and running by using the Brooklyn Center Mediation Center and its volunteers. . Set up an office and select and staff to run the program. . Solicit funds for first a 3-month pilot project of about S6000 from civic groups, and area businesses plus other interested parties. An annual budget of about 525,000 would be sought from foundations, businesses, interested cities, fund raisers, and other sources. h'e would ask that you consider giving your official support to the program. We feel it is a direct benefit to the city of Fridley and that you will find that your city staff, police department, public works and city attorney will have occasion to rr.ake use of its services this year. Secondly, and separately, we ask for you to consider a request of 51,500 for this program in your 1987 budget to help meet the annual expenses of 525,000. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to making a forr�al request and presentation to your City Council. 13 RESOLiJTION N0. -1987 A RESOLUTION IN SIIPPORT OF THE CONTINUED FONDING OF THE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOC� GRANT PROGRAM BY THB CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE DESIGNATION OF ANORA COUNTY AS AN EHTITLEMENT COUNTY WHEREAS, there is a proposal bePore Congress Which targeta the Community Development Bloek Grant Program ("CDBG") aad eliminates all areas oP Minnesota except the cities of Minneapolis arid St. Paul; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley recognizes the benefits to its community of the CDBG program; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley further recognizes the negative impact on its citizens resulting from the loss of CDBG programs whieh assist its senior citizens, aids redevelopment in blighted neighborhoods, provides job opportunities for lower income citizens and supplies rehabilitation funding for loW income households. 230W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, hereby goes on record as being in support oP continued funding of the CDBG Program by the Congress of the United States and further supports the continued designation of Anoka County as an entitlement county. PASSED AND ADOPTID BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CIT3( OF FRIDLEY THIS r, DAY OF , 1987. AT'TEST : SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR 13A , ,_ ; �';��`� :�4��,w� .�,:� , �� ,,.,ti MARGARET LANGFELD Cou�ty Board of Commissioners District H3 COUNTY OF ANOKA 011ice o( the County Board of Comm;ssioners COURT HOUSE ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 421-4760 Mr. Nasim Qureshi, Manager City of Fridley, City I-lall 643) University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Qureshi: February 13, 19�37 I am writing to you to request your support to continue the Community Development Block Grant Program and to keep Anoka County an Entitlement County. I am particu{orly concerned about the proposal before Congress which targets CDBG and eliminates all areas of Minnesota except the cities of Minneapo{is and St. Paul. To support such action would be to ignore the lower income citizens who are scottered throughout Anoka County and the State of M i nnesota. Whenever attempts are made to (imit or eliminate the CDBG program, the abuses in the CDBG systems are highlighted. There are no abuses in Anaka County. The program has had a positive impact in Anoka County. It is important to tell our success story to our Senators and Representatives. During six years of CDBG projects, we have been able to: I) �edevelop f ive blighted neighborhoods; 2) create 350 new jobs for lower income persons through loans to business; 3) build eight Senior/Community Centers; 4) support counseling, medical, outreach and recreation services for our poor, elderly and handicapped citizens; S) acquire and support a battered women's she{ter serving about 200 individuals per year; 6) abate the cost of public improvements for low income residents; and 7) rehabilitate approximately 250 homes owned by very low income households. Page Two. Anoka County far exceeds HUD's requirements of using 51 °�'o of our CDBG funds to benefit (ower income persons. Our program benefit to lower income households has averaged 779'0 over the six year period. UVithout CDBG, we would have lacked the financial resources to accomplish these worthwhile projects. Woutd you ptease contact our Senators and Representative Sikorski asking them to take action to support the program so that we may continue to provide otherwise unavaitable services Qnd facilities to our citizens. Sincerely, _ ��. � /% �� - �� ' �.��s��.�-'� -� Margaret Langfeld Anoka County Commissioner Chairperson, Community Development Committee ML:sw 13B _ FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- LICENSES � FEBRUARY 23, 1987 ____ GAS SERVICES Pr�aAir Heating & Oooling Znc. 2315 Driftwood Lane Stillwater, t�i 55082 GIIdERAL COP7TRAC'.'bR Built Rite Homes Inc. 1425 Coon Rapids Blvd Coon Rapids, NIIV 55433 Daco Inc. I94 & Co. Rd. #36 Rogers, NIId 55374 Dundee Construction Co. 197 Longfellow Street N.E. Fridley, NffJ 55432 Kraskey & Sons Cons truction 2600 Grand S treet N. E. ��linneapolis, DIIV 55418 Season's Fou r Remodeling Inc. 1830 Glenwood Avenue Minneapolis, NIlV 55405 T & J Improvements 11630 Zion S treet N.W. Coon Rapids, rII1 55433 By: George Roberto Jr. By: Jim McOuay By: Frank D'Aiqle Daniel Wiederholt John M. Kraskey Bill Braverman Timothy S. Merritt � 16 APPROVED BY WILLIAM SANDIN Plbg.-Htg. Insp. DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg. Ofcl. Same Same Same Same S ame r � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY'COUNCIL -- LICENSES � B February 23, 1987 RESIDENTIAL RENTAL�PROPERTY �-.l��?�� -_ �1� !. : 1_ � �. J�1 4- �I�+ �' �.�./a� : . ;. . . Tom Olin 541 - 532 Avenue 136 Rivers Edge Way NE Fridley, MN 55432 Rodney Billman Inc. 4I5 - 63rd Avenue 151 Silver Lake Rd. New Brighton, MN 55112 2 �24.OD 1 12.00