02/27/1989 - 5380.---�
�� FRIDLEY CITY COU�►�tL MEETING ��
��TV oF �an�r
FRiGIEV
ATTENDANCE SHEET
MONDAY �
7:30 P.M. I
PLEASE SIGN NAME,ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER INTERESTED IN
�E ADDRESS
,
ccx===cs=a=a==cc==:�=caaoass=aaassz=�ssi a�=as=�smaao�oca=anc=-==-s=xasseaaascca==
l � ��� �
�
� I��l /-�c�s �
. , J
a S.��� y j i
�� _ �
�S�r� ����
ITENt NUMaER I
-az==:=cxeaa
FEBRIIARY 27� 1989 - 7:30 P.M.
The followinq are the ��ACTIONS TAREN�� by the administration for
your information.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Council Meeting, February 13, 1989
Approved
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Add: Item 20, Consideration of Receivinq Bid and Awardinq Contract
for Metal Doors in the Police detention facility
OPEN FORUM, VISITOR8:
There was no response from the audience under this item of
business.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Public Hearing on a Final Plat, P.S.
#88-03, Glacier Park Company Addition,
Being a Replat of That Portion of Lot
3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, Generally
Located at 5510 Main Street N.E., by
API Supply Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1 E
Opened at 7:50 p.m. Closed at 7:52 p.m.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Item is on next agenda for
consideration
,�: � 1
��
Council Meetinq, February 27, 1989
OLD BUSINESS:
Consideration of a Lot Split, L.S. #88-07
to Create a Separate Parcel from Auditor's
Subdivision No. 94 to be Described as the
South 140.00 Feet of the West 150.00 Feet
of Lot 7, Subdivision of Lot 10, Except the
West 75.00 Feet Thereof, Generally Located
at 1300 Skywood Court N.E., by William
Shields
and
Consideration of a Resolution Approving
L.S. #88-07, by William Shields (tabled
2/13/89) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 2 - 2
Paqe 2
Adopted Resolution 23-1989 approving lot split and granted the
five foot variance
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN:
Council approval.
Consideration of Second Reading of an
Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City
Code by Amending Appendix F to Provide
for the Adjustment of Salaries for the
Mayor and Council Members in Accordance
with Section 2.07 of the Charter of the
City of Fridley . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner notified of
. . . . . 3 - 3 B
Adopted Ordinance No. 920 and ordered publication.
CENTRAL SERVICES--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
NEW BUSINESS:
Consideration of an Agreement with School
Districts to Turn Back Referendum Levies .... 4- 4 L
Approved agreements with the three School Districts
CENTRAL SERVICES--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs
Thereof: Water, Sanitary Sewer and
Storm Sewer Praject No. 188 . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5 A
Adopted Resolution 24-1989
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
� Council Meetinq, February 27, 1989 Paqe 3
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement, Approval af Plans and
Ordering Advertisement for Bids:
Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer
Proj ect No . 188 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 A
Adopted Resolution 25-1989
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs
Thereof: Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 A
Adopted Resolution 26-1989
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
Consideration of an Amendment to Development
Agreement for Vantage Companies . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 F
Tabled indefinitely
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Holding for a possible future
agenda
Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing
for a Vacation, SPU #89-01, by WBDH Realty,
Northtown Nissan, for March 20, 1989 ...... 9- 9 D
Set public hearing for March 20, 1989
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT--ACTION TAKEN Set the public hearing for
March 20, 1989
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs
Thereof: Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 A
Adopted Resolution 27-1989
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
;
�
Council Meetinq, February 27, 1989
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs
Thereof: Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989-2, Addendum No. 1......... 11 - 11 A
Adopted Resolution 28-1989
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Appraval of Plans and
Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 1989-1 and
ST. 1989-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12 A
Adopted Resolution 29-1989
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing
Execution of a Loan Agreement with the
State of Minnesota for Portable Breath
Testing Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13 A
Adopted Resolution 30-1989
POLICE DEPARTMENT--ACTION TAKEN: Agreement executed
Consideration of a Clean Tndoor Air
(No Smoking) Policy for the Renovated
Municipal Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 B
Paqe 4
Approved, with the exception of the Apparatus Room in the Fire
Department. City to offer a program to employees for smoking
cessation
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeding as authorized
Appointment: City Employee . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Approved
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE--ACTION TAKEN: Informed Accounting
Department of new employee
Council Meetinq, February 27, 1989
Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Approved
CENTRAL SERVICES--ACTION TAKEN: Paid claims
Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Approved
CENTRAL SERVTCES--ACTION TAKEN: Issued licenses
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18 A
Approved
CENTRAL SERVICES--ACTION TAKEN: Paid estimates
Consideration of Change Order No. 5 for the
Municipal Center Renovation Project
and
B. Consideration of Resolution to Make Tax Free
Purchases of Materials and Supplies for the Fridley
Civic Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19 C
Approved Change Order No. 5
and
Adopted Resolution 31-1989
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN: Proceeded as authorized
Consideration of Receiving Bid and Awarding Contract
for Hollow Metal Doors for Police detention
f acil ity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 0
Paqe 5
Received bid from Nystrom, Inc. and awarded contract to
Nystrom, Inc. for a total of $13,609.
PUBLIC WORKS--ACTION TAKEN:
award
Adjourn: 8:39 p.m.
Informed Nystrom, Inc. of contract
RESOLUTION NO. - 19$9
RESOLUTION TO MAKE T1�1X FREE
PURCHASES OF MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
FOR THE FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has recently subsitituted
Kraus-Anderson Construction Company as the construction manager
for the Civic Center Remodeling Project, and
WHEREAS, Kraus-Anderson Construction Company has recently
advised the City that pursuant to Minnesota Sales and Use
Taxation Regulations Section 8I30.I200 subparagraph 3(D) that zt
is possible for the City to purchase materials and supplies for
the Civic Center remodeling without paying sales tax for these
� i�ems, and
WHEREAS, in order for the City to not pay sales tax on
materials and suppiies purchased it is necessary for the City
to directly purchase all suppli�s and materials and for this
purpose to designate each of the individual contractors as
purchasing agents for the City of Fridley, and
WHEREAS, by designating each of the contractors as purchasing
agents for the City of Fridley, the City then assumes full
responsibility for any defects in said materials and supplies as
weil as assuming risk of any losses which might be sustained as a
result of the thief of said materials and supplies, and
WHEREAS, in order to comply with Minnesota Sales and Use
Taxation Regulation Section 8130.1200 subparagraph 3(D) it is
necessary to provide certain terms and conditions in the contract
between the City of Fridley and each of its contractors.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley as
follows:
l. That except for those contracts where supplies and
materials have already been purchased and paid for by
the City, the City hereby authoriaes the City staff
to execute the following addendum to all of the ,
contracts it has entered into on the Civic Center
remodeling project:
"Tax free purchases will be accomplished by the
City establishing a principal/agent relationship
with the contractor per the following items:
(a) Title to all materials, supplies and
equipment purchased pursuant to this
appointment shall immediately vest in the
City of Fridley at the point of delivery.
19B
(b) The risk of loss with respect to such
materials, supplies and equipment is that
of the City of Fridley.
(c) The City of Fridley and not the contractor
has the responsibility for all defective
materials, supplies and equipment. �.
(d) The City of Fridley will furnish adequate
notification to alI vendors and supp2iers
of this agency relationship, and shall
make clear to such vendors and suppliers
that the obligation for payment is that
of the City of Fridley and not of the
contractor.
(e) All purchase orders and other documents
furnished to the vendor shall clearly
reflect this agency relationship.
(f> The contractor is authorized to and will
appoint its subcontractors as additional
purchasing agents to purchase materials,
supplies and equipment under these same
terms and condition."
2. That the City staff is authorized to execute change
orders with each contractor who enters into the
addendum referenced in paragraph 1 above. This
change order shall refiect a price reduction which
shall be an amount equal to the amount of sales tax
which the contractor wou13 have paid but for the
Addendum referenced above.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Fridley
this day of , 1989.
WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Shirley A. Haapala, City Clerk
(2/24/89 RES3-H&N)
�
19C
�C
SECTI�V COMTRACTOR
URIGIP� CONTRACT 51M4
7241 A.E CONRpD
9518 ARCHITECTURAL SALES
8385 BRIN NORTI�STERN
753td C. V. NIELSEN
b4@8 ENVIROI�IENTS, INC
15980 ENVIROIV—[�I
16�8 GEPFWRT ELECTRICf�.
8110 6LEMAiE D�RS, IF�
9� 6RANZZINI BROTF�RS
4408 JE5CA
1�8 KLAMtl�I M�CF�IVICf�
KRAUS �iDERSON
9�CS8 t�CAHY
3088 PAt&( t�15TRliCTI�V
14c'48 MIPNN�50TA ELEVATQR
9650 PINH COPIPANIES
6188 RO�IE
PAY APW.ICATIIN�i �5
IN�
PREVY�7S PAYR�NT5
Bt�.F�E TO FINISN
CIVIC CENTER t�DEL.Ih�i C�VTRi�T ESTIR�TES
Pay Application �5
Invoices Through 1-31-6b
CITY
CIVIC FIRE CITY
CENTER STATION SHARE
HRA
PLAZA
�
t2�379�274.88 f2b��238.00 f��641i51�.88 f777,658.�
f�1,588.64
f16,1b4.(d0
f28,78Q.�
f9, 278. la8
t19,86$.68
f44,413.�
f I 1, 826. Id8
f 26, 2'�@. �
f75,780.�
t43, 049. 83
f11,�.58
f36,471.fb8
f�8,056.0�
f36, 398. 70
f4,37b.43
f 10,15�9. 3b
f701. �
f6,876.54
f1,82b,57
f386,367.98 318,763.79
131,748.88
t1b,865.3�
ft@s 7�. �
�9,270.I�
f6,876.54
f19,858.68
f44,413.�
f 11, id'2b. id8
t16, 280. i�
t75,788.�
f43,049.03
f 11, t�6. 58
f36, 47I.1�
f0.�
it0� I�Sti. 00
f3b, 398. 78
i5,4@3,�D
f 1, 458. �
� 153, 8�. 80
i405,131.77 f155,258.A�
f755,027.69 t112,185.a0 5667,21�.69 f�'55,803.0@
t1,�37,878.33 f131,289.�1 fi,"sb9,167.54 t36b,596.2�
TOT�
f3,419,178. N
f31,748.88
f 16, 865. 32
f28,7@@.88
t9,278.�
f6,876.54
f19,868.68
f45,871.@8
t11,626.8@
f16,288.�
f75,788.�
f43, 049. 83
f11,806.58
f�, 471.88
f 153, 8N. 8B
f20, �556. 8B
t36,39B.10
f5, 4@3. �8
f5b8, 398. 57
f1,123,815.69
t1,735,7G3.74
�..�..��r '
.� r
�1 �� • � � � ,�,, ���
v
KRAUS-ANDERSON CONSTRUG�ION COMPANY
CONTRACTORS 6 CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
:r? • ' • I 1
7,'O: BILL BQRNS, CITY !lANAGBR ,
CITY COIIl�CIL, FRIDLEY, I�i
PRO�►t: A. SACRETT, PROJSCT I+IANAGBR
RE: , DETENTION HOLLOW MST�I.
BIDDING AND Ai/ARD OF CONTRACT
DATE: Februa=y 27, 1989
Kraus Anderson discovered approximately 3 weeks ago that the
Security hollow metal section of specifications had not been bid
nor contract awarded.
In checking with several suppliers through out the country, we
found that this particular product has a large back-log in many
manufacturing producers. Therefore, I selected people I thought,
after phoniirg, that would be willing to bid the project. Letters
and bid information were sent to:
1. Universal Security Products Inc.
P.O. Box 3649
Hayward, CA
2.
3.
Trussbilt
2.5 7 5 Como Ave .
St. Paul, MN
Nystrom, Inc.
1701 Madison St. NE
Minneapoli�, MN
I established a 7 day bidding period from these three suppliers.
I received 1 bid from Nystroms, Inc. The security doors will be
supplied by Johnson Fire Door who is a recommended supplier by
�pecification. Their price is $6,654.00.
The hardware wi11 be supplied by Southern Steel at a price of
$4,900.00. The gun lockers will be supplied by American Locker,
3 units with 4 compartments for a total of 12 compartments at a
price of $2,055.00.
The total price is $13,609.00. These materials are very critical
to t2ie construction schedule on Fridley Minnesota Municipal Center.
,+1=�'L'?.��
�'�/���
,� !! �
MINNEAPOLIS DIVISION
525 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55404 PHONE: 6t2-332-7281
. '� �
i: �
; --
.....:
1 .,. °
MENIORANDOl�I
� - Bill Burns, City l�anaqer
,�, February 27, 1989 -
Paqe -2-
�, -
� Th� secured area in the Police Department will be the last area com-
� pleted on the project. Kraus-Anderson hereby recommends that Nystrom,
a Inc. be awarded the contract for specification�section 11190-Detention
- Hollow Metal.
4
�
• � ' , .. ' \ . ' . . .
��' . . . . . . . .
�� . . ; ��...� . , . . . � � . . , � . .
Y� � - � � � � . �
TAS/ke
�
� '
EWDI.�E1(
5m
Y
s
he
ed
PLEDGE OF AILEGIANCE:
APPROVAL OF MitMES:
Councit Meeting, February 13, 1988
IIDOPTION OF AGENDA-
OPEN FORl11. VISI70RS:
(Consideration of items not on egenda - 1 inutes)
FEBRIJART 27, 1989 - 7:30 P.M.
NEY BllS[I�SS (CONTIMIED)�
PUBLIC NEARING�
Public Hearing on a Finat Plat, P.S.
#88-03, Gtacier Park Company Addition,
Being e Replat of That Portion of Lot
3, Auditor's Subdivision Ho. 79, Generall
Located at 5510 Main Street N.E., by
API Supply Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1 E
OLO BUSINESS-
Consideration of a Lot Split, L.S. #88-07
to Create a Separate Parcel from Auditor' ti o�
Subdivisian No. 94 to be Described as the �� o
South 140.00 Feet of the West 150.00 Feet �',K �1
of Lot 7, Subdivision of lot 10, Except t i
Nest 75.00 Peet Thereof, Generelly locat qi�
at 1300 SkyWOOd Court N.E., by Hiltiam St%
Shields 9'`�
and
Consideration of a Resolution Approving
L.S. #88-07, by William Shields (tabled
2/13/89> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2
Consideration ot Second Reading of an
Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City
Code by Amending Appendix f to Provide
for the Adjustment of Salaries for the
Mayor and Council Members in Accordance
with Sectiort 2.07 of the Charter of the
City of fridley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 B
�NEY BUSINESS- -
�-
Consideration of an Agreement with School , ��•,
Districts to Turn eack Referendun Levies .� 4- 4 Li
�"� I
�.�,,\C.
,� Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimetes of Costs
Thereof: Yater, Sanitary $ewer and
°'� Storm Sewer Project No. 188 . . . . . . . . . . S - S A
�.�: , .. � ��
� Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement, Approval of Plans a�d
Ordering Advertisement for Bids:
v��4later, Sanitary Sewer 8 Storm Seuer
Project No. 188 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 A
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs
�LThereof: Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 A
;.,� Consideration of an Amendment to Development
'j-" Agreement for Vantage Canpanies . . . . . . . 8 - 8 F
Consideration of Setting a P�lic Hearing
o;`for a Vacation, SPU #89-01, by 6iBDH Realty,
Northtown Nissan, for March 20, 1989 ...... 9- 9 D
'�Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
� Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs
,��` Thereof: Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . �, . . . . 10 - 10 A
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
lmprovement end Final Plans and
_,Specifications and Estimates of Costs
Thereof: Street lmprovement Project
No. ST. t989-2, Addendum No. 1�. ..... . 11 - 11 A
j
j
I'
i
t Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
lmprovement and Approval of Plans and
-- Ordering Advertisert�ent for Bids: Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 1989-1 a�d
ST. 1989-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12 A
PRIDIEY CITT OaINCII MEETING - PAGE 3
I�lt BUSINESS [CONTIMIED)•
Consideration of a Resolution Authorizinp
Execution of a loan Agreement with the
State of Minnesota for Portable Breeth
Teating instrunents . . . . . . , . . . . 13 - 13 A
Ca�sideration of a Clean Indoor Air
��(No Swoking) ?olicy for the Renovated
Nunicipnl Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 B
Appoint�ent: City Employee . . . . . . . . . 15
Ctei�ns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
,
L i censes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 T
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18 A
Adjourn:
Council Meetinq, February 27, 1989
OLD BIISINESB:
Paqe 2
Consideration of a Lot Split, L.S. #88-07
to Create a Separate Parcel from Auditor's
Subdivision No. 94 to be Described as the
South 140.00 Feet of the West 150.00 Feet �
of Lot 7, Subdivision of Lot 10, Except the
West 75.00 Feet Thereof, Generally Located
at 1300 Skywood Court N.E., by William
Shields
and
Consideration of a Resolution Approving
L.S. #88-07, by William Shields (tabled
2/13/89) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2 J
Consideration of Second Reading of an
Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City
Code by Amending Appendix F to Provide
for the Adjustment of Salaries for the
Mayor and Council Members in Accordance
with Section 2.07 of the Charter of the
City of Fridley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 B
0
NEW BUSINESB:
Consideration of an Agreement with School �
Districts to Turn Back Referendum Levies .... 4- 4 L
,
Council Meetinq, February 27, 1989
NEW BUSINE88 (CONTINOED):
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs �
Thereof: Water, Sanitary Sewer and •
Storm Sewer Project No. 188 . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5 A
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement, Approval of Plans and
Ordering Advertisement for Bids:
Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer
Project No. 188 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 A
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering '
Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs
Thereof: Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 A
Consideration of an Amendment to Development
Agreement for Vantage Companies . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 F
Paqe 3
Council Meetinq, February 27, 1989
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINIIED)S
Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing
for a Vacation, SPU #89-01, by WBDH Realty,
Northtown Nissan, for March 20, 1989 ...... 9- 9 D
Paqe �
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs -
Thereof: Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 A
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Final Plans and
Specifications and Estimates of Costs
Thereof: Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989-2, Addendum No. 1......... 11 - 11 A
Consideration of a Resolution Ordering
Improvement and Approval of Plans and �
Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Street
I�provement Project No. ST. 1989-1 and
ST. 1989-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12 A
Council Meetinq, February 27, 1989
NEN BDSINE88 (CONTINLTED):
Paqe 5
Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing
Execution of a Loan Agreement with the
State of Minnesota for Portable Breath
Testing Instruments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13 A
Consideration of a Clean Indoor Air
(No Smoking) Policy for the Renovated
Municipal Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 B
Appointment: City Employee . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Li�eenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Council Meetinq, February 27, 1989
NEA BUSINESS (CONTINtTED):
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18 A
Consideration of Change Orders for the
Municipal Center Renovation Project;
A: Approving Change Orders 1-3,
B: Approving Change Order No. 5,
C: Approving Change Order Eliminating
Sales Tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19 A
Adjourn:
r
Paqe 6
THE MINIITES OF THE REGIILAR MEl3TING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL OF
FEBRIIARY 13, 1989
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Billings,
Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman
Schneider and Councilwoman Jorgenson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 18. 1989:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgensan. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
COUNCIL MEETING. JANUARY 23, 1989:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
The following item was added to the agenda: (31) Consideration of
Awarding Contract for the Millwork for the Civic Center Remodeling
to Country Cabinets, Inc.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda with the above
addition. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
Mr. Roger Blohm, North Suburban Consumers Advocate for the
Handicapped, requested assistance from the residents of Fridley in
contacting businesses in the City to determine if they are
accessible to the handicapped. He stated this information would
then be compiled in a booklet�to show which places in Fridley are
accessible to the handicapped. He stated the booklet, "Access to
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 1989 PAGE 2
Friendly Fridley" was printed in 1983, but does need to be updated.
Mr. Blohm stated for those persons who can assist in this effort,
there will be a training session held on Thursday, February 16 from
3 to 5 p.m. and again at 7 to 8:45 p.m. at the Fridley Library, 410
Mississippi Street. He stated for those who desired further
information they could contact Steve Barg at the City of Fridley,
the Islands of Peace Office, Jesse Ellingsworth, Executive Director
of the North Suburban Consumers Advocate for the Handicapped, or
himself.
Councilman Billings stated it may be helpful for Mr. Blohm to
explain what information is contained in this booklet.
Mr. Blohm stated the booklet contains the names of businesses and
hospitals that are handicapped accessible. He stated this would
mean there are the proper curb cuts and door widths to accommodate
persons in wheelchairs. He stated the cities of Bloomington and
Richfield now have such a booklet and this would set a trend for
the northern suburbs.
Mayor Nee thanked Mr. Blohm for his presentation and felt this
booklet had considerable demand over the years. He stated if
residents could give a few hours of their time to assist in this
effort, it would be greatly appreciated.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-2
ADDENDUM NO. 1(COMMERCE LANE - 73RD AVENUE TO OSBORNE ROAD):
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the readinq of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
7:51 p.m. �
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated Commerce Lane from 73rd
Avenue to Osborne Road will require major reconstruction. He
stated this street serves an industrial area which generates a
considerable amount of heavy truck traffic. Mr. Flora stated due
to this traffic and poor soil conditions under the roadway, the
street requires extensive maintenance just to keep it in a minimal
service condition. He stated Commerce Lane was originally
constructed in 1966 at a cost of $29,365.58 and assessed at a rate
of $7.46 per foot.
Mr. Flora stated soil borings were taken and it was found that the
water table was about three feet below the surface with large
pockets of silty sand. He stated it is proposed to increase the
width of the street from 39 to 44 feet, install concrete curb and
gutter, storm sewer improvements, and increase the strength from
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 1989 PAGE 3
a 9 ton to an 11 ton design.
Mr. Flora stated letters were sent in November to the businesses
located on this street informing them of the plan for this
improvement and requestinq their input. He stated the estimated
cost for the starm sewer improvement is $56,000 and $397,000 for
the roadway improvement. He stated the Council has approved the
concept of sharing in the cost of this improvement by paying one-
third of the cost and the other two-thirds assessed against the
abutting properties.
Mayor Nee clarified that these costs are only estimates and would
not be firm until after the project is bid.
Mr. Flora stated if this project is approved, it is hoped it can
be done this spring and the street would not be closed to any truck
traffic during the construction period.
Ms. Podany, owner of Allied Aluminum, asked why sidewalks would be
incZuded in this project.
Mr. Flora stated the form used to notify owners of improvements
does include reference to sidewalks. He stated this is a standard
form, however, this project would not include any sidewalks. He
stated the improvement is only for the roadway and storm sewer.
Ms. Podany verified that two-thirds of the cost would be paid by
the City and asked how the assessment to the property owner was to
be paid. Ms. Podany was advised the assessment was spread over
a ten year period.
Mr. Jim Naughton, representing Larsen Manufacturing, asked who
would benefit by the storm sewer improvement.
Mr. Flora stated the storm sewer improvement would be done so
property in the northwest quadrant of Osborne Road and Main Street
can be developed in the future. He stated this is a separate cost
from the cost for the street improvement.
Mr. Naughton asked if the street would be accessible to truck
traffic during the construction period as he stated they have semi-
trucks delivering steel and they cannot drive on sand. Mr. Flora
stated one side of the street would be open to traffic.
Mr. Naughton asked how long the project would take before
completion. Mr. Flora stated it should not be longer than a month.
Mr. Naughton asked at what rate of interest they would be assessed
for this improvement. Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated the
interest rates have been between 8-3/4 to 9�.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 1989 PAGE 4
Mr. Gary Benson, Tax Specialist representing Pillsbury, stated
their opposition to the street improvement. He stated they have
a concern about ingress and egress to their property during this
improvement period. He stated they are not in a position to
stockpile materials and they need to be able to receive deliveries
and ship the finished product.
Mr. Benson stated it seems the storm sewer improvement is needed
under Osborne Road and there was concern they would be paying for
some future development and not receiving any benefit. He felt,
however, Mr. Flora had clarified the storm sewer would be a
separate cost from the street improvement.
Mr. Benson stated in the original notice, there was mention of
sidewalks and they felt this would be a nuisance. He stated,
however, this item has been cleared and they understand there would
be no sidewalks included in the project.
Mr. John Gariano, Plant Manager for Pillsbury, stated he supports
the fact that they need to keep the plant open as it would cost
them about $25,000 a day, if it had to shut down. He stated he
wished to stress they needed to keep the access open.
Mr. Benson stated Pillsbury understands the need for the
improvement, but is concerned as to the financial burden and hoped
the estimates have been high. He stated profits are very small in
the pizza business and if they have to shut the plant, it would be
a hardship. He felt they need some guarantee the access would
remain open at all times during construction and would be happy to
work with the City in any way.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated the major reason for rebuilding this
street is that it cannot accommodate all the heavy traffic. She
stated the road is deteriorating and the reconstruction will be
less costly than trying to make improvements every spring.
Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Benson if the City keeps one-half
of the road open during construction, if it alleviates their
problem with this project.
Mr. Benson stated that is part of the concern, but from the
financial standpoint, he felt their truck traffic comes basically
from the south part of Commerce Lane, where there is not silty
sand, and they are not having that much of a problem with this
portion of the road. He stated they are looking at the financial
burden and questioned if it is prudent to proceed with the project
at this time. He stated if the improvement solves the problem it
is fine, but did not want to have to go through the same thing in
another ten years.
Mayor Nee stated where this type of improvement has been done in
�'RIDLEY CITY COUNGIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 5
the past, it�has worked.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed
improvement. .
MOTION by Councilman Billings to close the public hearing. Seconded
by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
closed at 8:18 p.m.
2. PUBLIC HEARING ON YARD WASTE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
8:18 p.m.
Ms. Lisa Campbell, Planning Assistant, stated this hearing is in
regard to a proposed yard waste ordinance which would require
seasonal curbside collection of yard waste for eight weeks during
the spring and eight weeks during the fall. She stated there is
also a friendly amendment which would require continuous pick-up
throughout the yard waste season.
Ms. Campbell stated in 1988, the Minnesota Legislature amended the
Waste Management Act of 1980 to prohibit dumping of yard waste at
landfills in the State. She stated in response to this mandate,
which goes into effect in 1990, many cities have amended their
licensing requirements to include seasonal pick-up of yard waste.
Councilman Schneider asked if staff knew what action other cities
were planning.
Ms. Campbell stated Ramsey has a pilot project for wood and brush
and anticipates having organized collection in 1990 which would
include curbside yard waste collection in the licensing contracts.
She stated Coon Rapids is just beginning their recycling program.
Councilman Schneider questioned the need for the ordinance. He
stated he is not sure what would be accomplished by adopting the
ordinance. He felt whether or not they adopt the ordinance, the
matter of yard waste would have to be handled by refuse haulers in
1990.
Ms. Campbell stated this would be the Council's decision if they
desire to adopt the ordinance. She stated if the ordinance is
adopted, it would give refuse haulers time to implement programs
before the 1990 ban and for the City to educate residents of the
legal and appropriate ways to disperse of yard waste.
Mayor Nee stated it would place the same burden on all refuse
�'RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 6
haulers and provide uniformity.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the City was being required by any
other agency to pass such an ordinance.
Ms. Campbell stated Anoka County has indicated that the cities
within the County are responsible for curbside collection of
recyclables and yard waste.
Mr. Hendersan, Blaine Waste Management, stated he has been very
supportive of composting of yard waste. He stated at a meeting
of the County Yard Waste 5ubcommittee on February 7, it was not
clear if haulers would be able to take these materials to the
facility at Bunker Hills. He stated there was discussion regarding
a fee for deposit of the materials and the possibility materials
cannot be brought in that are not de-bagged. He stated if haulers
cannot dispose of materials that are not de-bagged, it would be
very difficult. He stated suggestions were made to the
Subcommittee which included the use of a standardized container.
He stated the Yard Waste Subcommittee was to study the matter
further.
Mr. Henderson stated the refuse haulers were in support of this
proposed ordinance until this meeting of the Yard Waste
Subcommittee and a lot of the haulers were in fear of the whole
program. He stated if there is not a facility where they can haul
this yard waste, they could not comply with the ordinance. He felt
the adoption of the ordinance may be a little premature.
Councilwoman Jorgenson questioned if a fee was charged for dumping
the yard waste if this was the problem. She stated the fee they
now pay at the landfill is more than what they probably would be
charged to deposit the yard waste.
Mr. Henderson stated the real issue is if they would be required
to de-bag the materials.
Mayor Nee asked Mr. Henderson his feelings regarding collection
from April to November, rather than just spring and fall.
Mr. Henderson stated it would not be very economical to collect
from April to November. �
Mr. Saba, Larry's Sanitation, stated he would agree with Mr.
Henderson's comments. He•stated at this time it is not feasible
to collect yard waste unless there is a facility where you can
deposit it. �
Councilman Schneider asked if the City did not have an ordinance,
if the haulers would provide the service to pick-up yard waste.
Both Mr. Saba and Mr. Henderson stated he would provide this
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 1989 PAGE 7
service.
Mr. Saba stated it would be good to use a biodegradable bag for
the yard waste. He felt after 1990, residents will be paying
higher fees for refuse service.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated it will be cheaper for haulers to
deposit this yard waste at a compost site rather than a landfill.
Mr. Saba stated costs would probably start out lower, but they
would increase in time. He felt the State is passing legislation,
without having a solution to the problem.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated the big issue is to get everyone
involved in recycling and reduce the amount of dumping at the
landfills. She questioned if haulers would be giving a discount
to those who do not have as much garbage.
Mr. Saba stated it would probably depend on the hauler. He felt
customers should pay for the amount of garbage they generate and
if they only have one can per week, they should pay accordingly.
Mr. Plessel, Pretzel Sanitation, felt haulers should be collecting
yard waste. He stated as far as cost, another truck and person
would be needed and these increased costs would have to be passed
on to the consumer. He stated he would agree that if you recycle
and have less garbage, your fee should be less.
Mr. Plessel stated he would begin collecting yard waste in April
and continue into November. He stated he hoped a solution can be
reached whether or not the yard waste has to be de-bagged.
Mr. Plessel stated he did not know if adopting this ordinance would
be beneficial, but it would let residents know what can and cannot
be done.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if anyone knew the cost for
biodegradable bags. Mr. Saba stated he thought they were about 30
cents per bag.
Ms. Campbell suggested the Council postpone action on this
ordinance until the County resolves their problems.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed
ordinance.
Mayor Nee thanked the refuse haulers for their input and stated he
appreciated their assistance to the City.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
�,RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETSNG OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 8
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 8:58 p.m.
3. PUBLIC HEARING ON COMMi7NITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAMS:
AND
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE 1989 COMMUNITY DEVEIAPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAMS•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
opened at 8:59 p.m.
Ms. Campbell, Planning Assistant, stated there was a person present
to communicate with the hearing impaired if this was necessary.
Ms. Campbell stated this hearing is in regard to the allocation of
1989 Community Development Block Grant funds. She stated the
County has revised the 1989 allocation to $109,899. Ms. Campbell
stated the distribution of these funds is proposed as follows:
$69,236 for the Riverview Heights project; $34,068 for human
services; and $6,595 for commercial rehabilitation.
No persons in the audience spoke regarding the allocation of these
Community Development Block Grant funds.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 9:05 p.m.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the allocation of the
1989 Community Development Block Grant funds as follows: $69,236
to the Riverview Heights project; $34,068 for human services; and
$6,595 for commercial rehabilitation. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman
Schneider, Councilman Billings and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the
motion. Councilwoman Jorgenson abstained from voting. Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried.
4. PUBLIC HEARING ON A REZONING, ZOA #88-04. BY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MYNNEAPOLIS
AND ST. PAUL, PER SECTION 205.09.O1.C.7 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE TO ALLOW HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY ON LOTS 1 THROUGH 16
BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1 AND 30, BLACK 2. NORWOOD ADDITION TO
FRIDLEY PARK GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF ST. WILLIAM'S CHURCH•
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 9
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
opened at 9:06 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this is a request to rezone
property adjacent to St. William's Church from R-2 and C-3 to R-3
for a senior housing project. She stated the Planning Commission
considered the rezoning application and recommended approval.
Ms. Dacy stated the lot and structure requirements in the R-3
district are more restrictive than the setbacks in the R-2. She
stated the required setbacks maintain a 35 foot yard area along
5th Street and a 15 foot yard area adjacent to the existing
duplexes to the north.
Ms. Dacy stated this housing project will consist of 70 units, 50
one bedroom units and 20 two bedroom units. She stated common
areas will be provided, including laundry rooms, storage closets,
lobby, a dining/multi-purpose room, and a workshop and lounge.
Ms. Dacy stated the building is H-shaped and exterior materials
are masonry, rock face block, aluminum and stucco. She stated
adequate parking has been provided.
Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner, Community Development Corporation,
wanted to finalize their plans and apply to the HRA for funding.
She stated it was necessary to obtain an easement from the church
which would guarantee there would not be any buildings within the
easement in order to meet the R-3 district requirements.
Ms. Dorie Meade, Housing Resources Corporation, stated they are
providing technical services to the Community Development
Corporation for the Archdiocese of Minneapolis and St. Paul. She
introduced Mr. Steve Ludovissie, Director of Housing and Management
for Community Development Corporation, the management arm for the
Archdiocese, and Mr. John Culligan, Architect from Boarman and
Associates. �
Ms. Meade stated the need for this project was first identified by
St. William's Church which established an elderly housing task
force. She stated St. William's agreed to make the site available
and an independent market study was conducted to determine the need
for the project. . Ms. Meade stated Community Development
Corporation agrees with the market study and feels this is an
excellent site for senior housing. She stated the name Norwood
Square was selected as this housing will be located in the City's
Norwood Addition.
Ms. Meade stated Norwood Square will have a full-time manager on
site and a personal security system included in each apartment.
She stated pull'cords will be located in each bath and bedroom for
residents to call for emergency help.
FRIDLEY CIT COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 10
Ms. Meade stated Community Development Corporation plans to take
all the necessary steps to meet the range for rents recommended in
the independent market study. She stated, hopefully, rents will
start at $500 per month for a one bedroom unit and between $750 to
$800 per month for a two bedroom unit.
Mr. Ludovissie stated Community Development Corporation was
established in 1974 and is a non-profit organization created for
the purpose of serving needs of low and moderate income families.
He stated they concentrate on the needs of residents in all the
buildings they manage.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked the size of the apartments.
Mr. Culligan, Boarman and Associates, stated the one bedroom units
will be about 608 square feet, but could vary up to 650 square
feet. He stated the building is three-stories, wood construction,
with underground parking. He stated the driveway entrance is on
the east to a central drop-off area which is handicapped accessible
to the main lobby. Mr. Culligan stated in addition to the H-shape
of the building, there is a hip roof to scale it down and minimize
the height fronting on the street. He stated three different types
of material will be used for the exterior including rock-faced
block, aluminum siding, and stucco.
Mr. Culligan stated they have worked with the City staff to develop
a landscaping plan that will enhance the building and character of
the neighborhood. He stated Norway Maples will be planted along
5th Street and crab trees planted around the parking lot. He
stated there would be a four foot hedge between the parking lot and
street. He stated eight foot evergreens would be planted to the
north along the entire property line.
Mr. Culligan stated they are proud of the project they have
developed and hoped the citizens of Fridley will also be proud of
it.
Some questions from the audience included the size of the bedrooms,
type of heating, laundry facilities, entrances, and rents. Mr.
Culligan stated the bedrooms are about 12 feet wide by 15 feet
long. He stated the.entire unit is about 24 feet wide. He stated
the heating is hot water baseboard and individual window units will
be provided for air conditioning. He stated there are laundry
facilities on each floor and one main entrance, but exits on each
wing for fire purposes. He stated the square footage for the two
bedroom unit is between 800 to 1,000 and rents would be from $750
to $800 per month.
Ms. Meade stated rents have not been firmly established because
the financing has not yet been arranged. She stated, hopefully,
they will be between $500 to $800 per month depending on the unit.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 1989 PAGE 11
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated underground parking would not be
available for all residents and asked how it would be determined
who would receive these parking spaces.
Mr. Ludovissie stated a lot of time senior citizens do not drive
and do not have vehicles. He stated probably only 50 to 60 percent
would have vehicles and the z;�ajority of tenants could be served
with underground parking.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked .if there would k�e an additional charge
for underground parking.
Ms. Meade stated there would be a charge and the rate is about $40
per month.
Mr. Ron Nienaber, 6251 5th Street, stated he is appalled with the
building materials proposed for this project. He stated what is
proposed is an industrial building material and aluminum is cheap.
He stated it appears they are building as cheaply as possible, but
the rents are high. He also stated central air conditioning is
more energy efficient. He stated the units would still have their
individual controls as they do with the heating.
Mr. Nienaber stated he is not necessary opposed to senior housing
across the street from his residence, but would like to have a
nicer building.
Ms. Dacy stated the HRA would address this issue of exterior
materials if they apply for financial assistance.
Mr. Nienaber stated if this property is rezoned, technically, any
apartment building could be constructed and not necessarily senior
housing.
Ms. Dacy stated the procedure is established so that action would
be taken on the lot split and special use permit requests before
the final reading of the ordinance for this rezoning. She stated
restrictive covenants would be filed with the special use permit
that the building would be used only for senior housing.
Mr. Maertens, 144 Rivers Edge Way, stated he is the owner of a
duplex immediately to the north of this property. He stated he is
opposed to the exterior materia2s to be used as he felt they did
not belong in a residential neighborhoad.
Ms. Meade stated there seems to be a misunderstanding as far as
the aluminum siding. She stated it is very unusual for residential
dwellings to be constructed with wood siding because of the
constant maintenance. She �elt the building would be very
attractive and a combination of materials will make it appear more
residential in nature.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 12
Councilman Schneider stated Fridley has a tradition of requiring
brick or brick surfaces on buildings.
Ms. Meade stated it is something they could consider, but felt
brick would make it look more institutional.
A gentleman in the audience commented that this was the nicest
looking apartment building he has seen proposed for Fridley.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed
rezoning request.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 9:55 p.m.
OLD BUSINESS•
5. CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #88-15, BY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MINNEAPOLIS AND
ST. PAUL PER SECTION 205.09.O1.C.7 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE
TO ALLOW HOME FOR THE ELDERLY ON LOTS 1 THROUGH 16 BLOCK 1
AND LOTS 1 AND 30 BLOCK 2 NORWOOD ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF ST. WILLIAM'S CHURCH:
Mayor Nee stated the question of the exterior materials to be used
on this building was discussed in conjunction with the rezoning.
He felt the stipulations for the type of exterior construction
would probably be part of this special use permit.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, felt it would be premature to take
action on the special use permit this evening if there is not
agreement on the exterior materials.
Councilwoman Jorgenson felt the issue of the exterior materials to
be used in construction has to be addressed.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to table this item until staff
and Community Development Corporation discuss the exterior
materials and submit recommendations to the Council. Secanded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, Councilwoman Jorgenson,
Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Mayor Nee voted
in favor of the motion. Councilman Billings voted against the
motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried.
6. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT. L.S. #88-05. BY COMMLJNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MINNEAPOLIS
AND ST. PAUL TO CREATE A SEPARATE PARCEL FROM THE NORWOOD
ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK PLAT TO BE DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1
THROUGH 16 BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1 AND 30, BLOCK 2. NORWOOD
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 13
ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK, TOGETHER WITH VACATED ALLEYS - THE
SITE TOTALS 121.500 S4UARE FEET AND IS GENERALLY LOCATED EAST
OF ST. WILLIAM'S CHURCH ABUTTING 5TH STREET N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this 1ot split is to divide
the St. William's Church property into two lots, one would contain
existing buildings and the second lot would contain a proposed
senior housing project. She stated an easement should be recorded
in conjunction with the recording of the lot split to prohibit
additional building construction within it.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of
the lot split with three conditions which she outlined.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, asked if the easement is for open space
or can it be used for parking.
Ms. Dacy stated building construction would be prohibited in this
easement, but the petitioner needs to submit a storm water
management plan and it may be necessary to create a pond within
the easement area.
Mr. Herrick stated there should probably be a broader explanation
as to the use of the easement and if certain recreational
activities would be allowed.
Ms. Mead stated in the easement area, there is some parking and
St. William's is going through some changes at the church and
trying to maintain some flexibility for themselves. She stated
their intent was no structures of any sort would be constructed in
this area, but did not know if it would be available for
recreational uses.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve lot split, L.S. #88-05
with the following stipulations: (1) submission of an easement
agreement to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's Office
addressing the following issues: (a) proper legal description of
the easement; (bj prohibiting building construction within the
easement; (c) recognizing the existence of the church parking area;
(d) allowance of a storm water management pond or other drainage
and utility structures; and (e) other issues as determined by the
City Attorney; (2) the easement shall be recorded in conjunction
with filing of the lot split at the Anoka County Recorder's Office;
(3) the applicant shall submit a survey of the entire property and
provide the legal description for both parcels and the easement;
and (4) this approval is subject to approval of rezoning request,
ZOA #8$-04 as filed by Community Development Corporation. Seconded
by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
RECESS:
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 14
A recess was�called by Mayor Nee at 10:03 p.m.
RECONVENED•
Mayor Nee reconvened the meeting at 10:18 p.m. All Council members
were present.
�TEW BUSINESS:
7. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING
THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING APPENDIX F TO PROVIDE FOR
THE ADJUSTMENT OF SALARIE5 FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2.07 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve
the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Billings.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
8. CONSIDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 6 1989
FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 4.06 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
CHARTER•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the public hearing on this
proposed amendment for March 6, 1989. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
9. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH
NORTHCO BUSINESS PARK:
AND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-1989 APPROVING A FINAL PLAT ` P.S. #88-02.
�IORTHCO BUSINESS PARK:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this development agreement
includes the special conditions regarding tree preservation,
landscaping, driveway limitations and architectural guidelines, as
well as provisions necessary to complete the improvements to serve
the plat. She stated the City Attorney's office has reviewed the
document and it is requested Council consider approval at this
time.
Mayor Nee asked about the window treatment language. Ms. Dacy
stated this was proposed by the developer.
Mr. Bruce Carlson stated this was inserted as a guideline for
design and they voluntarily prepared the guidelines.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated his office has reviewed the
development agreement and made a few suggestions which were
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13 1989 PAGE 15
incorporated. He stated before the agreement is executed, someone
from staff should review the legal description of the easements to
make sure they are accurate.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the development agreement
with the Fridley Business Center Partnership for Northco Business
Park. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote,
Councilman Billings, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilwoman Jorgenson
and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Schneider
abstained from voting. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 14-1989.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, Councilman
Billings, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilwoman Jorgenson and Mayor
Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Schneider abstained
from voting. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried.
10. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
JANUARY 25, 1989•
A. CONSIDERATION OF A FINAL PLAT. P.S. #88-03. GLACIER
PARK COMPANY ADDITION BEING A REPLAT OF THAT PORTION
OF LOT 3. AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 79, GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 5510 MAIN STREET N.E., BY API SUPPLY
COMPANY•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the public hearing for
February 27, 1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
B. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT. L.S. #88-07, TO CREATE
A SEPARATE PARCEL FROM AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 94
TO BE DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 140.00 FEET OF THE WEST
150.00 FEET OF LOT 7 SUBDIVISION OF LOT 10 EXCEPT
THE WEST 75.00 FEET THEREOF, GENERALLY LOCATED AT
1300 SKYWOOD COURT N.E.. BY WILLIAM SHIELDS:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated the purpose of the lot split
is to create a parcel suitable for construction of a single family
home. She stated in 1964, Mr. Shields requested a lot split, which
was approved by the Council, to split property into three parcels.
She stated one of these parcels is the lot split being requested
at this time. She stated the reason Mr. Shields is again
requesting the lot split is because the lot split was never
recorded at the County.
Ms. Dacy stated after this lot split was before the Planning
Commission, it was found that corner lots require an 80 foot width,
rather than 75 feet. She stated since this parcel only has a width
of 75 feet, it would be necessary for the Council to also grant a
�RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 16
variance of the lot width, if this lot split is approved. She
stated staff has no objection to the variance as this lot split was
previously approved by the Council.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval
of the lot split with three stipulations which she outlined.
Councilman Billings stated he is concerned with the fact that if
the lot split is approved, it would create a sub-standard lot. He
stated he realizes it was previously approved, but if this would
set of precedent with persons not recording lot splits. He felt
he would like additional time to consider it.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this lot split request and
direct staff to contact the petitioner as to his plans for this
lot. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting of January 25, 1989. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING OF FEBRUARY l, 1989:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the minutes of the
special Planning Commission meeting of February 1, 1989. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously
12. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 FOR THE FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL
CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 189:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated when the roof of the Civic
Center was removed, it was found that the masonry piers along the
south side of the building were not constructed as designed. He
stated the supporting piers lack the necessary steel to support the
new colonnade structure. He stated this change order and addition
to the project would allow for the design and construction of
replacement piers for the colonnade system at an estimated cost of
$30,700.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. 4 for
the Fridley Municipal Center Project No. 189 in the amount oF
$30,700. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
13. RECEIVING PETITION NO. 1-1989 FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
RE4UESTING A STOP SIGN AT 51ST WAY:
AND
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 17
CONSIDE`RATION OF INSTALLING A STOP SIGN AT 51ST WAY:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive Petition No. 1-1989.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize the installation of
a stop sign at 51st Way. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
14. RECEIVING PETITION NO. 2-1989 FROM THE RESIDENTS ALONG EAST
RIVER ROAD AND HARTMAN CIRCLE RE4UESTING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS:
AND
RESOLUTION NO. 15-1989 TO THE ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
REGARDING THE INTERSECTION OF HARTMAN CIRCLE AND EAST RIVER
ROAD•
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated he and Commissioner McCarron attended
a meeting with residents on Hartman Circle in regard to roadway
improvements. He stated they wanted a right turn lane onto Hartman
Circle, an exit lane from Hartman Circle, and an approach grade
from Hartman Circle to East River Road. He stated Commissioner
McCarron agreed to bring this request to the attention of the
County Highway Department. He stated it would be appropriate to
submit this resolution to the County since the petition was
addressed both to the City and County.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive Petition No. 2-1989.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 15-1989.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
15. RECEIVING PETITION NO. 3-1989 RE4UESTING IMPROVEMENTS IN
SUPP�RT OF THE NORTHCO PLAT:
AND
RESOLUTION NO. 16-1989 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS.
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: WATER,
SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 188 lNORTHCO
BUSINESS PARK ON 73RD AVENUE):
MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive Petition No. 3-1989.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 16-1989.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRZDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 1989 PAGE 18
16. RESOLUTION NO. 17-1989 RECEIVING PRELIMINARY REPORT AND
RECEIVING PETITIONS AND WAIVING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
MATTER OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: WATER
SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER PROJECT N0. 188:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 17-1989.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
17. RESOLUTION NO. 18-1989 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS�
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-1 jNORTHCO DRIVE):
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 18-1989.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
18. RESOLUTION NO. 19-1989 RECEIVING PRELIMINARY REPORT AND
PETITION TO WAIVE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF THE
CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-1 (NORTHCO DRIVEI:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 19-1989.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
19. �,2ESOLUTION NO. 20-1989 RECEIVING PRELIMINARY REPORT AND
RECEIVING PETITIONS TO WAIVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER
OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-2 (UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST
SERVICE DRIVE. 83RD AVENUE TO NORTH 500'):
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 20-1989.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
20. RESOLUTION NO. 21-1989 TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH SUMEK
ASSOCIATES INC FOR LONG RANGE PLANS AND GOALS FOR THE CITY
OF FRIDLEY•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 21-1989.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
21. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS FOR THE MUNYCIPAL CENTER
�ECHNICAL SYSTEM:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated seven requests for
proposals were sent out and there was only one company who bid
according to the specifications. He stated the bid was received
from Electrosonic Interiors in St. Paul. Mr. Hunt stated the base
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 2989 PAGE 19
bid was $107,128.49 and there were several options. He stated the
options were for a Kodak video transfer system, Nytone video
transfer system, and studio cameras.
Mr. Hunt stated it is the recommendation of the City's consultant,
Marlo Johanson of Electronic Interiors that the Council award the
base bid along with the option for the two studio cameras for a
total of $124,238.47. He stated if the Council desired an A/B
switch, the estimated cost is $5,479.
Councilman Schneider asked the original estimate for this
equipment. Mr. Hunt stated for the base bid, it was estimated about
$112,000. He stated it was felt the City could obtain the
equipment included in the base bid with two cameras for about
$115,000, but the cost is actually about 9 percent over this
amount.
Mr. Hunt stated in regard to the video transfer systems, it is a
matter of quality of the image. He stated the less expensive would
project a good image, however, with the most expensive there would
be a noticeable difference in quality.
Mayor Nee asked if staff knew why only one bid was received.
Mr. Hunt stated there was interest shown by several firms, however,
only one actual bid was received that complied with the bid
specifications.
Councilman Billings asked Mr. King of Electrosonic if there was
anything unusual in the bid specifications.
Mr. King stated there was very little custom work involved.
�
Mayor Nee asked how the studio cameras would compare with Nortel's
cameras.
Mr. King stated the consultant, Mr. Johanson, would have to answer
this question.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if any part of this system was made
in the United States.
Mr. King stated the remote control equipment, microphones, and a
few custom items are made in the United States, probably about 25
percent of the total items.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, questioned the warranty and
maintenance.
Mr. Hunt stated the warranty is for one year and at the end of this
time, the equipment would be checked by the City's consultant. He
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 1989 PAGE 20
etated at that time, the City could enter into a maintenance
agreement if the Council felt it was appropriate.
Mr. King stated Electrosonics was founded in England and has had
headquarters in Minneapolis for the last 15 years. He stated they
are nationwide and he covers the Midwest area. He stated they have
had experience with technical systems for corporation board rooms
and training facilities. He stated their company has completed
work for Disney, the Smithsonian Institute, and Kennedy Space
Center. He stated locally they did the audio and control portion
of the City of Minnetonka's Council Chambers, some work for
Burlington Northern, and the video wall for Dayton's.
Mr. King stated this project for the City would be considered a
small to medium job. He stated last year they had two $1,000,000
projects proceeding at one time.
Councilman Schneider asked Mr. King if he has worked with the
City's consultant, Marlo Johanson.
Mr. King stated he has worked with Mr. Johanson in the past and is
familiar with his work.
Mr. Hunt stated he asked the consultant about the quality of
Electrosonic's work and he stated there was no question that they
were a qualified bidder.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bid for
the Municipal Center Technical System:
Mr. Richard King
Electrosonic
6505 City We'�t Parkway
Minneapolis, MN 55344
Base Bid: $107,138.49
Kodak VTS: 5,188.31
Nytone VTS: 9,715.91
Camera: 8,549.99
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Billings stated he was disappointed that more bids were
not received, however, this would not be a guarantee they would
have been lower.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to award the base bid for the
Municipal Center Technical System to Electrosonic in the amount of
$107,138.49. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to purchase the Kodak VTS system
for $5,188.31 from Electrosonic. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
�RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 1989 PAGE 21
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to purchase two studio cameras from
Electrosonic at a cost of $8,549.99 each. Seconded by Councilwoman
Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to direct staff to initiate a change
order to purchase the A/B switch for the technical system at a cost
not to exceed $5,479. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
22. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING THE TELEPHONE SYSTEM BIDS FOR THE
MUNICIPAL CENTER:
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated six bids were received for
the telephone system for the Municipal Center. He stated the
consultant reviewed the bids for compliance with the specifications
and it was found that only two vendors fully complied with these
specifications. He stated these two vendors are GTE and TeleComm
North.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for
the telephone system:
AT & T
VI COMM
$76,508.08
58,075.00
BELL SOUTH COMMUNICATIONS 72,751.00
GTE
TELECOMM NORTH
NEC
66,548.00
70,290.00
73,781.38
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Pribyl stated one of the concerns was to basically make the
system easy to use. •He stated this particular system is software
driven.
Councilman Billings stated one of his concerns is that
communication is one of the most important aspects of City
government. He stated he would feel more comfortable if staff had
an opportunity to use the phone system and discuss the operation
with others who may have the same system. He stated he was
concerned with the feel of the handset and the sound.
Mr. Doug Ruth, the City's consultant, stated he would recommend
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 22
this be done, if the Council feels more comfortable with this
approach. He stated the handset is a personal opinion. He stated
as far as the speaker phone, TeleComm North has a much better
quality, but as far as functioning, both GTE and TeleComm North are
about the same.
Mr. Ruth stated if there is a power failure, the TeleComm North
system automatically retains all the programs. He stated there
are 12 phones for emergency purposes should there be a power
failure. He stated the option for a battery backup has not been
recommended as the cost would be about $3,000 to $4,000. He stated
the City does not have this feature now on the present phone
system.
Mr. Aldrich, Fire Chief, stated there is emergency power available
at the Civic Center which would be used for the phone system if it
was needed.
Mr. Ruth stated the needs of the City for the next ten years was
considered in evaluating the phone system. He stated the phones
are fully digital and ISDN compatible.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the bid for the telephone
system for the Municipal Center to GTE for $66,548. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
23. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING AND AWARDING BIDS FOR THE
RECREATION SHOWMOBILE�PORTABLE STAGE UNIT:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the following bids for
the Recreation Showmobile/Portable Stage Unit:
Wenger CorporatiQn
555 Park Drive
P. O. Box 448
Owatonna, MN 55060
Century Industries
P. O. Box U
Sellersberg, IN 471•72
$54,279.00
$55,829.00
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Kirk, Parks and Recreation Director, stated these bids were
opened on February 2 and two bids were received, one from Century
Industries and the other from Wenger Corporation. He stated
$70,000 had been budgeted for this showmobile.
Mr. Kirk stated staff would recommend the low bid from Wenger
FRZDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 23
Corporation of $54,279 be accepted.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the bid for the
showmobile/por�tage stage unit to the low bidder, Wenger Corporation
in the amount of $54,279. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
24. RESOLUTION NO. 22-1989 TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR THE
PURCHASE OF LAND FOR THE NORTH SATELLITE FIRE STATION:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated the City has negotiated a
settlement with the property owner for the purchase of land for
the satellite fire station. He stated although the purchase price
is slightly more than the appraisal, he felt it was fair and
warrants consideration. He stated if the City had to proceed with
condemnation, the cost would have been much higher.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, asked if the resolution included any
reference to soil conditions and the sale was subject to soil
testing.
Mr. Aldrich, Fire Chief, stated he did not recall any particular
problems in this area with the soil. He stated as a practical
matter, the City probably may want to take some soil samples.
Mr. Herrick stated the condition regarding soil borings could be
included in the purchase agreement.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 22-1989,
with this sale being contingent on the results of soil borings on
this property. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
25. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING OF
NOVEMBER 28. 1989:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive the minutes of the Charter
Commission meeting of November 28, 2989. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
26. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE CATV ��:"�VISORY COMMISSION MEETING
OF JANUARY 19. 1989•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receise the minutes of the Cable
Television Commission meeting of January 19, 1989. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 24
27. �,PPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the following
appointment by.the City Manager:
E���
Robert Small
1501 80th Ave.
Brooklyn Park,
MN 55444
POSITION
Maintenance I
(Sewer)
Non-exempt
STARTING STARTING
SALARY DATE REPLACES
$9.16 per Feb.
hour 1989
$1,587.73
per month
13, Steve Coyle
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
28. CLAIMS•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No.
24651 through 24948. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
29. LICENSES•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the licenses as
submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
30. ESTIMATE5•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approves the estimates as
submitted:
Herrick & Newman, P.A.
6401 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
For Services Rendered as City Attorney
For the Month of January, 1989
Smith, Juster, Feikema, Malmon & Iiaskvitz
6401 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
For Services Rendered as City Prosecutor
For the Month of November, 1988
$ 5,430.50
$ 8,640.00
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13 1989 PAGE 25
C.S. McCrossan,
P. O. Box 1240
Maple Grove, MN
Inc.
55369
Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1988 - 1& 2
Estimate No. 9 $10,192.36
Layne Minnesota
3147 California St. N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Repair and Maintenance of Wells No.
6, 8, 11 - Project No. 186
Estimate No. 1 (Well #6)
$ 1,000.00
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
31. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR MILLWORK FOR THE CIVIC
CENTER REMODELING:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the low bidder for this
millwork has failed to provide a performance bond, therefore, it
is requested the Council consider awarding this contract for the
millwork to Country Cabinets, Inc., as recommended by Kraus
Anderson. He stated Country Cabinets was the lowest bidder that
could provide a performance and payment bond.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for the
millwork to Country Cabinets, Inc. in the amount of $98,790.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded
by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular
Meeting of the Fridley City Council of February 13, 1989 adjourned
at 11:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad
Secretary to the City Council
Approved:
William J. Nee
Mayor
�
ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM
CONTINGENCY
CONTRACT SAVINGS
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FEE
COUNCIL APPROVAL 8/22/88
REMOVE BOSSARDT CHRISTENSON
Remaining Const. Manager Fee
Remaining General Expenses Budget
ADD KRAUS ANDERSON
Construction Mgmt Fee
On-Site Supt. 8 Proj. Mgr.
General Expenses
ADD COUNTRY CABINETS - MILL WORK
REMOVE BLOOMBERG
ADD V.T. INDUSTRIES - DOORS
REMOVE UNIVERSAL SUPPLY
RE7�AODELING CONTRACT SUMMARY
CITY
-------------- -------------- -------------- �
CIVIC FIRE CITY
CENTER STATION SHARE
�2,320,136.00 5247,986.00 32,568,122.00
534,800.00 S9,OOO.OQ 543,800.00
52.3,�3��0 55,982.00 $29,112.40
54,525.64 5,827.93 a60,353.58
-------------- -------------- -------------- �
2,432,592.04 268,795.93 2,701,387.98
(16,357.69) (1.748.38) (�18,106.0�
(83,670.88) (8,943.10) (592,613.98)
29,709.48 3,175.48 532,884.96
7,864.28 840.57 58,704.85
83,670.88 8,943.10 592,613.98
91,874.70 6,915.30 598,790.00
(74,692.00) (6,000.00) ($80,692.00)
22,878.39 3,418.61 a26.297.00
(19,822.00) (3,000.00) (522,822.00)
HRA TOTAL
----------- --------------
PI.AZA
RAMP
5750,878.00 $3,319,000.00
516,200.00 560,000.00
510,767.60 539,880.00
17,646.42 $78,000.00
----------- --------------
795,492.02 3,496,880.00
(5,293.93) (�23,400.00)
(27,078.85) ($119,692.83)
9,615.04 542,500.00
2,545.15 11,250.00
27,078.85 119,692.83
98,790.00
(580,692.00)
26,297.00
(22,822.00)
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- - --------------
R
EVI ED N 1
S COU L APP
C R VA
O L12
/ 3/
89
�<`:>::;;:�`# ,;; ;>�;,;:,,::>:<.;;:;. :::::::::;:.;.:.>:;;,,;:.;:.;:`:..,.:�::[:<<<>::::>:`s ;:.;::>:;> ,. ;;;;,;>.>�'�:':::::<::::»::<::<:>::>::<:`,..,;;.: :;;:>;;.:.;::; ; :;:;:::::::€:::::>':::>:::>:::<::>::::::;;<»>,;;;::«::>::
........ .. �`!�.t}47 �..... .... ��3ST�'�a�.: .. ... �,i4���.7''� ...............8f?��358 �'9. ..... .. .�3�,8D3,00:>
.
�
�'.
CHANGE ORDERS
ADMIN CHAh1GE ORDERS - PROPOSAL RE�. #�
1 3,740.00 1,836.00 5,576.00 5,576.00
2 1,781.00 1,781.00 1,781.00
These numbers are subject to change. : 3 3,249.00 3,249.00 � 3,249.00
4 0.00 0.00
5 0.00 8,975.00 8,975.00
6 0.00 0.00
7 5,536.00 5,536.00 5,536.00
8 70.00 70.00 70.00
9 760.00 760.00 760.00
10 0.00 0.00
11 0.00 0.00
12 0.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.00
14 1,597.00 1,597.00 1,597.00
15 2,635.00 2,635.00 2,635.00
16 1,413.00 1,413.00 1,413.00
-------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
1Q,253.00 12,364.00 22,617.00 8,975.00 31,592.00
ORIGINAL CONTRACTS
PLUS - PAYMENTS TO BOSSARDT
PLUS - KRAUS ANDERSON
PLUS - ON-SITE SUPT. & PROJ. MGR.
PLUS - MILL WORK
PLUS - DOORS
CHANGE ORDERS
TOTAL CONTRACTS + C.O.'S
TOTAL COM'RACTS + C.O.'S + p.R,'S
EXCESS OR (DEFlCIENCI�
�D S
2,320,136.00
38,167.94
29,709.48
7,864.28
16,831.14
3,023.25
247,986.00
4,079.56
3,175.48
840.57
1.266.86
451.75
2,568,122.00
42,247.50
32.884.96
8,704.85
18,098.00
3,475.00
1
2
3
4 30�700.00 30�700.00
-------------- -------------- --------------
2.446,432.09 257,800.22 2,704,232.31
-------------- -------------- --------------
17.36211 2.233. 29 19,595.40
750,878.00
12,352.50
9,615.04
2,545.15
--------------
775,390.69
17.99260
3,319,000.00
54,600.00
42,500.00
11,250.00
18,098.00
3,475.00
30.700.00
--------------
3,479,623.00
:::>:: �'��;�:1'E:�� 5>t�!;
37.588.00
�
�
G7YOF
FRlDLEY
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
C�1IIIMUNII�Y DEVELOPMENT'
DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
February 23, 1989
�f' � '
William Burns, City Manager �.
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Public Hearing for Final Plat, API Supply Co.,
P.S. #88-03
Attached is the staff report for public hearing on the Final Plat
for the API Supply Co. at 5110 Main Street N.E. After closing the
public hearing, the Council may approve the subdivision accordinq
to the recommended conditions of approval from the Planning
Commission. The resolution which authorizes signature of the final
plat will not be submitted to the City Council until the final plat
mylars have been reviewed and approved by City and County staff.
BD/dn
M-89-87
�
�
�
lA
Staff Report
P.S. #$8-03
API Supply Co.
Page 2
REQUEST
The petitioner, API Supply Company, is requesting to replat that
portion of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, generally located
at 5110 Main Street N.E. A replat is needed in order for the
petitioner to mortgage their building located at this site. API
Supply's title company will not issue insurance unless the property
is subdivided.
ANALYSIS
Background
The property was originally owned by Burlington Northern Inc. who
recently sold it to Glacier Park Company. Glacier Park will own
both of the lots to be subdivided, but will lease the northern lot
(Lot 1) to API Supply Co. Glacier Park does plan on developing Lot
2 in the future, however, there are no development plans as of yet.
Site
The property contains 18.5 acres and is being subdivided into two
parcels. The first parcel, Lot 1, is approximately 11 acres in
size and will contain the API Supply Company building. Lot 2
contains approximately 7.5 acres and is vacant. Both of these lots
comply with the regulations stated in the M-2, Heavy Industrial
zoning district.
The plat does not include the westerly 250 feet of Lot 3, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 79 because this portion is part of a different tax
parcel. Burlington Northern's railroad lines are located within
this area.
Further, the City is requesting a dedication bikeway/walkway
easement along Main Street. This portion of Main Street has been
designated as part of the City's bikeway/walkway corridor.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMZSSION
Staff recommends approval of preliminary plat, P.S. #88-03, with
the following stipulations:
1. Park fee for Lot 2 shall be paid at the time a building permit
is issued.
2. A bikeway/walkway easement shall be dedicated to the City and
recorded by August 15, 1989. '
�
Staff Report
P.S. #88-03
API Supply Co.
Page 3
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the
preliminary plat subject to the recommended stipulations by staff.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
After conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council may wish
to take final action on the final plat. It is recommended that the
City Council approve the final plat, subject to the stipulations
recommended by the Planning Commission.
The resolution which authorizes signature of the mylars will not
be sumitted to the City Council until reviewed and approved by City
and County staff.
', T.30, R.24
FR/OLEY
12 � ��,
3Rp
i '' x" " �' �p �
�' ND THERN � �' ,;. �
.
? : , r '� 9 . �s�� � I
. ,
�ar �♦ � W °oT!a?��1 .. .
�{� �WTLOT �� llN��
�' ! r - I.ND,,VyAY, �;yTL'v"' N�1����; �
.NN -_ , �Yti i
L�'..r� ... ��P� 3:1�6" OYh01Ct�-� 3 a
d .�o^'T".�'.°T /O �y. !
> ? L
,n � , , , .
: r.
��' i l � i �
Oa f
�`
t'�
; r �'r� ... . . ; . /
a ouT�or K s
� CEN R ,,, �"; � �
u'� ' // :: _ �
i � � ` � ;
_ t � �
�M/ � i
;'� � OUT�OT V . .
�% ---------- •'?.:� �
51 ST: WAY. :''., -' ; �' �
i.�r1r�T � � _� �.�' ,..
� �.�� .� nrr� a... . ✓ s. � M.�'�i
OUTLOT�MM
T9
6
�:
,..�.:.
� Sr.a7ES O� AMER/CA
f1 fe K
13
-
�
�
0
(rl
. •�'
P .S . 4�88-03
API Supply Co.
� r, � n � c�awit�nw+ cr ucaecs �s
. � 7NfY AIIfAt W/Hf L7!CwA C_ Uf!'Y
�OfHCE5.1'ffCf:NG THf I"Sl 5:���::.
'Hr OR.n..�..� �- �� �. ..�. 7;ti i��' FC i�.
�RS:"'NC. . . . .... "C'J:�:Y
�:.T _. .. . .. - . ...
, _,...;: _ �.. .J
53927
I I N.! �.,�.
sEC.n
__ _,..,�..
: �„ - � �
�
�� �
,r, =•� ,
R R«� ,�,, i�
' ��
�, �
�
I
1 �
,.+� `
.:�. s.... . � �
,vvi i c. I
I
� �
I, , T
4 �
� .,
i
�,, , .....:: "'�.r� i
Z I
� ' .
I
� :.., I
r � '�'" I
� w.r�a+�r I
� � 1
f � i ' i
r.
f � i�
� �
� ��� �
"' � w-�� I
I ��
! ' i
.�
�...... ...... �it/'....... ....
�
�( '4
,�
I t
.
i
I f
� � �" �
I : , '
rs. �` rn:
I �� ?
+I Y
i ;
g� ,. �
1 �.
�
..
I ��
14
-
{%,
N P R i �yt
Yt
ir.��
F. iN
SCC
...
.•r
.r' ��
..�..
�:°,:.:
i .�::� 4r .i�� ^
♦ %�I-S � l l/ N
� i-/ f� .��.�, i•Ir
� LOCATION MAP
1t) �
u
6
�
. 3
a
,-�
t
1
�.
i
� `�_—
� � � �Ef�
. �
�
..•:= :� � ��E
= � \ � �ii
• • j � Et�
# ��
' � �. F:
P.s. ��ss—o3 1�
` API Supply Co.
' �� �� { E- �� i � �#a}�.���� � �-s�
= aa
'�� �� S� � �� [� � � ���;f#�� i s=�;
� i �� r s :� 1 � E�i=��'� ! ���i ���;
� � c? n � �'� � � ��Fet��� � �� E
. i �:�_ _ �� ��' gx:=_. �t �':�P . .
�
(
(
Ih
I�
L
F
M
O
I: .
N
�
�
_�
��
<-<
$"�
N
�
,� -
(
n
� �
�
�
D
Y I�
t: I�1
3+ t J
lO
1 �
�
IN
I
``i'�
���
���
� �—
I" �;�
m�
+, <
�
�
�
�%�
-a=
SITE PLAN
_ __
1
7
n
r
<
�
s
�
�
r
s
�
�
ci�roF
F���
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
COl1ILMUNI"i'Y DEVELOPMENT'
DEi'ART'MENT'
MEMORANDUM
February 23, 1989
�A.
1'
William Burns, City Manager �•'�
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
L.S. #88-07, William Shields, Approve
Resolution
The City Council tabled action on the above referenced item at the
February 13, 1989 meeting due to the discovery of a lot width
variance and because the applicant was unable to attend the
meeting. Staff contacted the applicant regarding the necessity of
the variance. The applicant stated he will be able to attend
Monday's meeting.
The attached report discusses the implications of the variance.
It is recommended that the City Council approve a five foot lot
width variance and approve the attached resolution authorizing the
lot split.
BD/dn
M-89-96
�
2
P
� STAFF REPORT
APPEALS DATE
���QF PLANI�NNG CONMV�SSION DATE � January 25, 1989
FiZIDLEY C� Cia��i�. �/�� : February 13, t989 AuTHOR BD/dn
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION
SITE DATA
SIZE
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
& ZONING
��$
PARK DEDlCATION
ANALYSIS
FlNANCIAL IMPUCATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
COMPATIBILITY W(TH
ADJACENT USES $ ZONNG
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
L.S. ��88-07
William Shields
To create a separate parcel from Auditor's Sub. No. 94
1300 Skywood Court N.E.
Proposed lot: 10,500 square feet
Vacant
R-1, Single Family Dwelling district
N, I-694; S, R-I; E, R-I; W, R-I
Available
$�so.00
N/A
Yes
Yes
N/A
Approval.
Approval with stipulations.
,
2A
�=�
Staff Report
L.S. #88-07, W. Shields
Page 2
RE4UEST
William Shields, the petitioner, is requesting approval of a lot
split which would create a new parcel from Lot 7, subdivision of
Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 94, generally located at 1300
Skywood Court N.E. The purpose of this split is to create a parcel
suitable for the construction of a single family home.
ANALYSIS
Background
A lot split, L.S. #64-22, for this parcel was previously approved
by the City Council in 1964. The approval authorized subdivision
of the property into three parcels in order to construct homes on
two of them (see parcels B and C on the attachment labeled lot
split #64-22). The remaining lot (parcel A) contained the existing
single family home. The lot labeled parcel C is the same parcel
included in this application. The lot split authorization in 1964
for parcel C was not recorded at the Anoka County Courthouse within
the required time period. The subdivision approval therefore
expired, making it necessary for the petitioner to reapply for the
lot split approval again.
Site
The two parcels created by this subdivision comply with the lot
regulations required in the R-1 zoning district. The proposed
common lot line separating the two parcels encroaches upon an
existing gravel driveway which provides access to the house on the
northern lot. A driveway easement over that portion of the south
lot should be obtained to guarantee access to the northerly lot.
The existing driveway is gravel. Section 205.07.06.A.2 of the City
Code requires all driveways to be surfaced with blacktop, concrete
or other hardsurface material. The petitioner's driveway should
be brought into compliance with the City Code.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff recommends approval of lot split, L.S. #8$-07 to create a
separate parcel from Auditor's Subdivision No. 94, with the
following stipulations: �
1. A driveway easement over that portion of the south lot shall
be executed prior to the sale of the property.
2C
Staff Report
L.S. #88-07, W. Shields
Page 3
2. The existing gravel driveway on the north lot shall be
hardsurfaced by August 15, 1989.
3. Park fee of $750.00 (or current rate) shall be paid at the
time of building permit.
4. Future house on southerly lot shall be connected to City
utilities.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the lot
split request but amended the stipulations by deleting stipulation
#1 and rephrasing stipulation #2 to replace stipulation #1 as
follows:
1. The existing gravel driveway shall be relocated onto the
northerly lot and shall be hardsurfaced by August 15, 1989.
The Planning Commission also included stipulations #3 and #4 of the
staff recommendation in their motion as stipulations #2 and #3.
STAFF UPDATE
The City Council tabled action on this item at the February 13,
1989 meeting due to the discovery of a lot width variance. Section
211.07.19 of the subdivision ordinance requires an extra five feet
of lot width for corner lots. The minimum requirement in the R-1
district is 75 feet. Therefore, 80 feet is required.
The subject property as now described is in the shape of a flag.
The handle of the flag consists of the praposed lot to be
subdivided from the parent parcel. Because the proposed lot, for
practical purposes, does function as a separate lot and because an
adequate buildable area is achievable, denying the variance would
be forcing underutilization of the subject property. Although the
property owner would have use of the property, granting the five
foot lot variance would not be causing an overcrowded condition.
Staff contacted the Planning Commission chairman and made him aware
of the necessity of the lot width variance. He stated that it was
not necessary for this item to be re-presented to the Planning
Commission. �
The subdivision ordinance permits the City Council to grant a
variance to the ordinance requirements if the variation would not
be contrary to the intent and purpose of the subdivision ordinance
or other applicable regulations. The City Attorney has reviewed
this application and agrees with the staff analysis.
2D
Staff Report
L.S. #88-07, W. Shields
Page 4
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council grant a lot width variance
from 80 feet to 75 feet, and approve the resolution authorizing the
lot split, L.S. #88-07, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
The proposed resolution for approval is attached.
RESOLUTION NO. - 1989
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, IAT SPLIT,
L.S. #88-07, TO CREATE A SEPARATE PARCEL FROM
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 94 TO BE DESCRIBED
AS THE SOUTH 140.00 FEET OF THE WEST 150.00
FEET OF LOT 7, SUBDIVISION OF LOT 10, EXCEPT
THE WEST 75.00 FEET THEREOF, GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 1300 SKYWOOD COURT N.E.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the
meeting; and the Planning Commission
stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, such approval was to create a separate parcel from
Auditor's Subdivision No. 94 to be described as the south 140.00
feet of the west 150.00 feet of Lot 7, subdivision of Lot 10,
except the west 75.00 feet thereof, generally located at 1300
Skywood Court N.E.
WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey
from the owner; and
WHEREAS, such approval will create two separate parcels from
Auditor's Subdivision No. 94
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the
petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County within six
months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and
void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989.
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPLA - CITY CLERK
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
_ _ _
2�
0
EXHIBIT A
Ordinance No. - 1989
l. The existing gravel driveway shall be relocated on the
northern lot and hard surfaced by August 15, 1989.
2. A park fee of $750.00 (or current rate) shall be paid at the
time of the building permit.
3. A future house on the southerly lot shall be connected to City
utilities.
r
2F
L.S. #88-01
William Shields
' � f M� O R� e;' •� , o.. _...�__ .
,
. ' � rnY
� � , • a.aKE �� �� �_ • � „ ,
. / � �EAC �,� �,r r� x ...
� ' / `.� �, "' '"''` s EL L A D
/ 4;;� `'7 - ,. } t � �.
�
. . "'+ , ,
� i ��l..-�, � :
' i (Q � F�0/ N Ar'AD MY
• � --
.' ?
/ � ` .� `! � � Z ,p �5- : -----
• ,� � -- � �
� / � s .� � � � ,.. ,
• � � � G N
� �. �
� / � � � 1,j � �- JI +r �: �• tJ I) M � i
/ �� , .. _
/ ' ♦ 'j u� � ' 1 1
/ � �� ' • l 1
j / /�; � , �''� ��' � . + ` , � ` GRACE H/GN
/ � � f � 1 :
� S1 �t �
/�•�3 ,RI(Y ' ,, 1 �
- " �r� ,� A r''} � � r j 'Z �
. �
� � � � ' -�. � ` � SCHDOL ADD/T/ON
� .y\1',�� . '` � � ,. � s
�s
, • P� .► , . :" _ � �o
P .+'� < .� � s ! ' " i)
'l ' \ � �. T , � � Z ? ' , ���. �\_ i�
•• , .:, re �' � � " •;� „�sr.a
zs :r : - '�e�,� • �.�.us�
�� ��c •o:
, �/y+�/ '
rJ °% 77 l� �� !a )7 JI )! Ic ♦� K/ I 3 a S � 7 S ��N V Li /1 � i• � / �
�� •
. E 1_ � ATM Y A. � ,� . ' ;N� :RT. . s� � 1
_ �3 l� i is f�?�f S♦. 1 � 2 �J:4 e� � ^ it . 3.
d • �
• La VJ�I ',` s s 'QC//�UCliJ� � 1 �� � � •. � S� � L
• • ��
, . ` � ,� L
. . 3 �s �. lib T 3
,� .
.=' ; • B ; ' 2 �, s A D���/� � -- 'F � .� • H , ' ; ►c , � •
i• z. � 5 i � � N �3 s
-3 ± .� :S f 5
!� � e � �; C' f �
� • I. f ± 4 : �' i
�� -.. ,� � 1 �A
• L_� Gfun 3 2: . f S ) , t
.vi►�-� t
•' ���i• �° � V D/ V/S/ON 6 4^� s r � � • R . L, � •�
s�'. 4 w � . S n ; t �.`��
• � • • • � - . ; :
. . � �' :. � �� • � 4 , � ���:
. e � � � 8 � L �` ' ' ' S " FA RR
•,��s;� � ,o � u , '' s .;� � E
� •�: ��g , i �AKEL 0< � t �I �':-•"`�; ..,•��
'� .. a � t ...:: :.. ..•
. ,.�� 5�1i R ' _? � - ✓oniy view� � { :�� �3.^►• ..
., f ..
' �' � .a ME�GHTg : cn.is�an � ,:'�,'•,'-•�: ^,;
�= �' �, N ° ' � CArc+h ) ; .,;,�•�..
�_ � � • �� `:,�; . .;
! � .,�1 ... �
� _b �� � i L �; •!� �S'
�", � . .
:. �
p � �'� A% � M :�...:
i-, ��.-
PNE / �S ��,�"?^
'. —� s'? ti ! �:
,,.al�: :� pr.;�..; . • t � -::,��.
.'�•• � 4 '
� ` ,1 I % �
� � �- T�. �Q��� � �
� 9 " SKYW000 LANE / � n� K;
� � q � �s
�'' � � i � � � � .t G�L:,
J � � S , j AJ �r
r
_ 1' � � �� � �, � '•
• _ � . . .. r
ZONING MAP
2G
•, .-
� -- G�' 2H
� --- . - - T Jypp .
� • �` �1 r� P L• S. 1f C7 0- Q 7
� � y''.7,� � � � � � � � � � i � � j� �i ;., � William Shields . .
Fl Ilmore 4593 • 94 - 95 ' PR. ior 4050 '
,. �.
. ,.�
RAIPH D. THO,'U1AS & ASSOCt.47ES ItiC.
� ENGtNEERS �
400 McT. LiFr„ BLOG. '
MINNEAPOLIS 1, (VIiNNESO7A
�
0
�� � �`- 6 yc - � �z-
r33 .
� � . .
� � � .
�
�I . � � . . �s�' ,
� . :. . . . . �. :.
I � � � .� � :
w . . .
I� �°' � - . . �
ExisT. �
If � 2 ' Drs�ELL. � � , . .
� . � � . arcei A � . .
� o , . . .
I � ; c� �s' i : " " . _
��� .Parcel Parcel C. T,� WcsT =_ � oF T�� :
� � . . . .
� � o ► . ��rrri /40 ��'i tir �� .
� . �. �6upl�x �xis� - VACI►NT � ^ .
. �I � on n,a :: % . Q�c Sv8 D���..S,o.c7 �r . .
� � � (Part ot L.S.. # 7) : . ►'
� �T' /� �f���'lb2S
, . � �� • � ' . • ,. ' � �. .
� �8 ��, ..`��o�v�sro,v, ./Uo 91�. . �.
'' � ��. �..�� 7f ! /�
( ' `�� . ���
s3' - - � ' �� i Y� ' .. � .
l . . .
, � � ',',`� � ,o �.�c .
� � �` � F.9�R s��c c�� Ro. 66 'Q/�'/: ��' i�/. . :"
E--- - - --
( - 1„= 6p' .
Scalo:
.. . � � = /�on � .
. ,'il1e hrrcb� ccrtif� 7HAT WE HAVE ON THIS ........... ... Zu.T.H.._........__.._......__.DAY OF._1YGYEMdF�_....--.-1952_
�. MADE A SURVEY OF TH: REAI E57ATE DESCRIBED A5. _.TiS�E.. . l�i��sT�`RLX_..../S.�_ ._FEt�-._... o.�'....Lar._..�r...
�
...��»S!!BO/.YIS/ON.__..DF..._LQT_�o,._.��o, � LOT SPLIT #64-22
�
�
crnroF
F���
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMOR,ANDUM
February 16, 1989 ,
Virqil Herrick, City Attorney
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Lot Width Variance for Lot Split, L.S. #88-07,
William Shields .
We spoke on Monday, February 13, 1989 regarding the necessity for
a lot width variance in conjunction with the lot split request at
1300 Skywood Court N.E. (see attached surveyj. Section 211.05 of
the subdivision ordinance states that "...should the Planning
Commission or City Council find that any of the regulations or
requirements herein are not applicable to a proposed land
subdivision or to a preliminary or, final plat thereof, or would
cause undue hardship, it may permit such variations therefrom as
not contrary to the intent and purpose of these regulations or
other applicable law..." Please confirm as to whether or not you
agree with the following rationale for a recommendation of approval
regarding this variance request. •
The subject property as now described is in a shape of a flag. The
handle of the flag consists of the 75 foot wide by 140 foot long
piece that is proposed to be subdivided from the parcel. Because
this part of the parcel, for practical purposes, does function as
a separate lot, and secondly, because an adequate buildable area
is penaissible, denying the variance would be forcing an under-
utilization of the subject property. Although the property owner
would have reasonable use of the property, granting the five foot
lot width variance would not be causing an overcrowded condition.
Therefore, as stated in the above referenced variance section of
the subdivision ordinance, the additional five feet of lot width
would cause undue hardship on the property owner and granting the
variance would not be contrary to the intent and purpose of the
subdivision ordinance or the intent of the R-1 district.
BD/dn
M-89-80
Virgil C. Herrick
David P. Newman
)ames D. Hoeft
Gregg V. Herrick
������� � ��`�� ����i�T �?��.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW �
MEMORANDUM
T0: Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator
FROM: Virgil C. Herrick, City Attorney
DATE: February 17, 1989
RE: Lot Width Variance for Lot Split,
William Shields
%�
L.S. 88-01,
I have reviewed your Memorandum of February 16, 1989 regarding
the above lot split. I agree with your rationale recommending
an approval of the lot split.
VCH/lal
Suice 205, 6401 l.�niversity Avenue N.E., Fridley, !�tinnesota 5�432, 612-571-3850
2J
ORDINANC$ NO.
AN ORDINANCB RECODIFYINO THB FRIDLBY CITY COD$
BY AMENDIN(i APPENDIZ F TO PROVID$ FOR T8E
ADJDSTMENT OF SALARIEB FOR THE MAYOR AND
COIINCILMEI�iBBRB IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIOi1 2.07
OF T8B Cii�iRTSR Ol► THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
The annual salaries for the Mayor and Councilmembers during 1990
and subsequent years shall be as follows:
Mayor
Councilmember-at-Large
Councilmember, Ward I
Councilmember, Ward II
Councilmember, Ward III
$8,000.00
$6,550.00
$5,850.00
$5,850.00
$5,850.00
In addition, the Mayor and Councilmembers shall be entitled to the
same benefits enjoyed by full-time authorized employees of the City
of Fridley who are not covered by a labor agreement.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989.
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
First Reading: February 13, 1989
Second Reading:
Publication:
WILLIAM J. NEE — MAYOR
��
Virgil C. Henick
David P. Newman
James D. Hceft
Gregg V. Herrick
�-�����C� �z �i�'��"�,�.��T �d"�v
�
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
MEMORANDUM
T0: William C. Hunt, Assistant to the City M nager
FROM: Virgil C. Herrick, City Attorney;� �
DATE: February Z, 1989
RE: Council Salaries
I have reviewed your memorandum to me dated January 25, 1989,
and the attached draft of an ordinance regarding amendment of
city council salaries.
I am of the opinion that the memo as drafted is satisfactory.
I do not believe that it would be necessary to add an exclusion
of annual leave to the ordinance.
I also note your question whether the council can pass an
ordinance with automatic increases tied to the annual general
adjustment for non-union employees. I am of the opinion that
this cannot be done and that salary changes must be done by
individual ordinance.
I hope that the above answers your inquiries.
VCN:Idb
Suite 205, 6401 C?niversity Avenue N.E., Fridley, tilinnesota 55432, 612-�71-3850
3A
„
MEMO TO i VIR(3IL HERRICIC, CI Y ATTORNBY
FROI�it �ILLI7�1[ C. � SIBTl1�1T TO T8E CITY MANAGBR�
BIIBJECT! COIINCIL BALARIBB
DATEs JANIII�RY 25, 1989
Attached please find a draft of an ordinance adjustinq Council
salaries for 1990. It is scheduled for first reading at the
Council meetinq fln February 13.
I would appreciate it if you would review this ordinance and
suggest any changes which you think are appropriate. In our
discussion with Council members one suggestion was to add an
exclusion of annual leave as a benefit. I suppose one could raise
the question as to whether or not that is a benefit or a condition
of employment. However, under our flexible benefit plan an
employee can choose additional annual leave in lieu of health care
coverage.
The question was also raised as to whether or not the Council could
once and for all pass an ordinance which increased their salaries
by the same amount as the annual general adjustment for non-union
employees. That would eliminate the need to come back to the
Council every year for consideration of adjustment of salaries.
It seems to me that this would be against the law. I wou�d
appreciate your opinion on that matter as well.
Thank you very much for your attention to this matter.
cc: William W. Burns, City Manager
wcx/ss
�
�
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
CITY OF FRIDLEY
M E M O R A N D II M
,� ,
�
WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER ��
RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCB DIRECTOR
AGREEMENT WITH SCHOOL DISTRZCTS TO TORN BACK
REFERENDUM LEVIES
FEBRIIARY 23, 1989
Attached you will find the agreements that Mr. James O'Meara has
revised for us that will allow the City through a mutual agreement,
to turn back referendum levies to the School Districts. This
agreement has previously been run by the City Council in a
conference meeting and also has been approved by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority at their last meeting. It was their desire
to move this agreement onto the City Council for their approval and
proceed to the School Districts for the execution of the agreement.
As you recall, one of the concerns of the City Council and HRA was
the length of this agreement. The agreement has been structured
as a two year agreement and actually covers years of taxes payable
in 1988 and 1989.
,
Because of the time it has taken to develop this, 1988 is being
done retroactively. The agreement also provides some safety in
regard to the inclusion of our pre-1979 Districts. If a future
court would decide the pre-1979's were not to be included in this
type of return, the agreement allows for the return of those levies
back to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
Mr. O'Meara has tried to put in language so that there is no
impairment of the existing bonded and indebtedness.
I have attached the spreadsheet that you have seen previously that
calculates the amount to be returned to each School District.
If you have any additional questions regarding this issue, please
feel free to call.
Attachment
� �
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is dated 3s of , 1989, is
by and between the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent
School District No. 14, and provides as follows:
1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement,
the following terms have the following meanings,
respectively:
�� City��
Minnesota.
"HRA"
Authority
Minnesota.
means the City of Fridley,
means the Housing.and Redevelopment
in and for the City of Fridley,
"School District" means the Fridley
SchooZ District, Independent School District
No. 14.
"Project" means Housing and
Redevelopment Project No. 1 established
and operated by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047.
"1985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's
$4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of
1985, dated May 1, 1985.
"Limited Revenue Note" means the HRA's
$5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital
Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated
December 20, 1985.
"19�85 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
511,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985,
dated December 30, 1985.
"1986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
510,045,Q00 General Obligation Tax Increment
Refunding 8onds, Series 1986, dated as of
August 1, 1986.
"Tax Increment Obligations" means the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue
Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O.
. -
Bonds, and any other contractual obligations
of the HRA or the City which were entered
into prior to the date of this Agreement
and cahich commit the ��se of any tax increments
from the TIF Districts for specified purposes,
projects, or parties.
�"Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179.
"TIF Districts means Tax Increment
Financinq District Nos. 1 through 8 within
the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains
certification dates and other information
on the TIF Districts. .
"Subdivision" means Laws of Minnesota
1988, Chapter 719, Article 12, Section 24
(a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
B), to be codified in the Tax Increment
Act as Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177,
Subdivision 10.
2. Recitals.
(a) In certain cases, the Subdivision
either requires or allows by agreement certain
tax increments attributable to school district
referendum tax levies to be paid to school
districts.
(b) TIF District Nos. 1 and 8 are
located entirely within the boundaries of
the School District, and a portion of TIF
District Nos. 2 and 4 are located within
the boundaries'of the School District.
(c) None of the property within TIF
District Nos. 3, 5, 6, and 7 is located
caithin the boundaries of the School District.
(d) It is the purpose of this Agreement
to provide for payment of certain tax
incre:nents to the School District pursuant
to and in accozdance with the provision
of the Subdivision.
(e) Nothing in
intended to violate
-2-
this Agreement is
the covenants and
agreements heretofore made respecting the
application of tax increments from the TIF
Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment
Obligations.
3. Representations of the City.
(a) The Tax Increment Obligations
were issued to finance various activities
of the HRA within the Project.
(b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not
general obligations of the City or the HRA.
Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1
through 5 are pledged to� the payment of
the 1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no
other sources of funds pledged to the payment
thereof. The fina2 scheduZed principal
maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February
1, 1999.
(c) The Limited Revenue Note is not
a general obligation of the City or the
HRA and is payable solely from tax increments
pledged for such purposes from TIF District
No. 6.
(d) The 1985
from tax increments
Nos. 1 through 6,
principal maturity
1, 2000.
(e) The 1986
f rom tax increments
Nos. 1 through 6,
principal maturity
1, 2000.
G.O. Bonds are payable
derived from TIF District
and the final scheduled
of those Bonds is February
G.O. Bonds are payable
derived from TIF District
and the final scheduled
of those Bonds is February
(f) Portions of the principal of the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue
Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986
G.O. Bonds were outstanding on May 1, 1988,
and are outstanding on the date of this
Agreement. None of the tax increment expected
to be received from TIF District Nos. 7
and 8 has been pledged to the payment of
bonds as of the date of this Agreement.
-3-
4�
(g) TIF District No. 1 was certified
prior to August 1, 1979, and neither the
City nor the HRA has taken any action the
effect of which would, pursuant to Section
469.179 of the Tax Increment Act, cause
said District to become generally subject
to the provisions of the Tax Increment Act.
4. Representations of the School District.
(a) On September 20, 1983, the
electorate of the School �istrict approved
a 6.5 mill levy extending for 5 years and
covering the 1983 payable 1984 through the
1987 payable 1988 property taxes. This
levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1983
Levy".
(b) On September 23, 1986, the
electorate of the School District approved
a 2.0 mill continuous levy first effective
for the 1986 payable 1987 property taxes.
This levy is hereinafter referred to as
the "1986 Levy".
(c) On September 29, 1987, the
electorate of the School District approved
(i) a 7.0 mill continuous levy first
effective for the 1987 payable 1988 property
taxes and (ii) a continuous additional 6.5
mill levy first effective for the 1988 payable
1989 property taxes. These levies are
hereinafter collectively referred to as
the "1987 Levies".
5. Payment of Tax Increments to School District.
The City and the School District hereby agree that,
except as otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph
6 of this Agreement, tax increments shall be paid
to the School District by the HRA as and to the extent
received by the HRA, beginning with such tax increments
relating to the 1987 payable 1988 property taxes (except
that the 6.5 mill portion of the 1987 Levies shall
in accordance with its terms first apply, where
applicable, with respect to increment relating to
the 1988 payable 1989 property taxes), as follows:
(a) TIF District No. 8. Since the
1987 Levies were approved after the date
of certification of TIF District No. S,
and since on May 1, 1988, there were not
bonds outstanding to which increment from
-4-
� �
r
TIF District No. 8 was pledged, the tax
increments from TIF District No. S which
are attributable to the 1987 Levies are
automatically payable and shall be paid
to the School District pursuant to clause
(1) of the Subdivision. Since the 1983
Levy .and the 1986 Levy were approved prior
to the date of certification of TIF District
No. 8, the Subdivision does not apply to
those Levies with respect to this District,
and no tax increments attributable to said
Levies from this District are payable to
the School District.
(b) TIF District No. 4. Since the
1983 Levy was approved prior to the date
of certification of TIF District No. 4,
the Subdivision does not apply to tha� Levy
with respect to this District. Since the
1986 Levy and the 1987 Levies were approved
after the most recent issue of bonds to
which increment from TIF District No. 4
is pledged, pursuant to clause (3) of the
Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF
District No. 4 which is attributable to
said Levies shall be paid to the School
District.
(c) TIF District No. 2. Since the
1983 Levy was approved prior to the most
recent issue of bonds to which increment
from TIF District No. 2 is pledged, the
Subdivision does not apply to that Levy
with respect to this District. Pursuant
to clause (3) of the Subdivision, the tax
increment from TIF District No. 2 which
is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the
1987 Levies shall be paid to the School
District.
(d) TIF District No. 1. Since the
1983 Levy was approved prior the most recent
issue of bonds to which increment from TIF
District No. 1 is pledged, the Subdivision
does not apply to that Levy with respect
to this District. Since the 1986 Levy and
the 1987 Levies were approved after. the
most recent issue of bonds to which increment
from TIF District No. 1 is pledged, pursuant
to clause (3) of the Subdivision, the tax
1
-5-
��
increment f rom TIF District No. 1 which
is attributable to said Levies shall be
paid to the SchooZ District; provided,
however, that the City believes, based upon
the opinion of counse? and the representation
contained in paragraph 3(g) of this Agreement,
that it is a matter of opinion as to whether
TIF �District No. 1 is subject to the
Subdivision in any respect, and the City
and the School District agree that if it
should be finally determined by the Office
of the Attorney General for the State of
Minnesota or by a court of competent
jurisdiction in this State that the
Subdivision does not apply to such a tax
increment financing district, then no further
increment shall be payable to the School
District pursuant to this sentence, and
all increment which shall have theretofore
been paid to the School District pursuant
to this sentence shall be remitted by the
School District to the City upon written
demand.
6. Further Agreements. Nothing in this Agreement
is intended or shall be applied in such a manner as
to violate the obligations and covenants made by the
City or the HRA in connection with the Tax Increment
Obligations, and to the extent but only to the extent
that the application of the terms of this Agreement
would give rise to a violation of said obligations
and covenants, including without limitation, the default
in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment
Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be
applied instead in the manner, but only to the extent
necessary, to avoid such default or other violation
of said covenants or obligations. Nothing in this
Agreement shall restrict the City or the HRA in the
exercise of the powers which they may have relating
to the Project or the TIF Districts.
In addition, the City and the School District
`< agree that, except in each case described in paragraph
5 of this Agreement where payment of tax increment
to the School District is mandatory pursuant to clause
(1) of the Subdivision, all other provisions of said
� paragraph 5 providing for payment of tax increment
' to the School District shall be limited to a term
covering 2 tax years, specifically, said provisions
shall apply only to such tax increment attributable
to the 1987 payable 1988 and the 1988 payable 1989
s real estate property taxes, respectively, and at the
� conclusion of said period, the City and the School
� District agree to review the circumstances and to
-6-
��
��
attempt to negotiate in
agreement or agreements as
and which are acceptable to
District with respect to
such applicable tax increment
good faith such further
may be permitted by law
both the City and School
discretionary payments of
to the School District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have
caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized
representatives.
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
Ma yor '
City Manager
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14
School Board Chair
Superintendent
-7-
EXHIBIT A
Schedule of Tax Increment Financing Districts
. Within Housing and Redevelopment
� Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA
TIF District
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
Name
Center City
l�ioore Lake
North Area
Johnson Printing/
Skywood Mall
Paschke
Lake Pointe
Winf ield
Shorewood
Independent
Certification School
Date District No.
5/11/79 14
7/31/81 13/14
5/19/82 11/15
1/20/84
3/15/84
12/24/85
10/22/86
10/24/86
13/14
16
13
16
14
��
EXHIBIT B
Ch. 719,.Art. 12 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1988 1996
Sec. 24. Aiinnesota Statutes 1987 Supplement� xction <69.177, is amended
by adding a subdivision to read:
Subd. 10. PAI'tifE.YI' TO SCHOOL FOR REFERE\DU�i LEtiY. The
m�•isions of this subdi�•ision SDDIy to taz increment financina districts and
ro'ects for w•hich certification was re uesttd before I�iav j 19gg, that are
located in a school district in which the voters ha�•e a ro�•ed new milla¢e or an
increase in millaae atier the tax increment financine district �•as cenified � if
there are no outstandin¢ bonds on May 1, 1988, to which increment from the
district is ledeed or � if the reterendum is a ro�•ed after ylav 1, 1gfi8, and
there are no bonds outstandina at the time the reterendum is a ro�•rd that
v►•ere issued before Mav j 1988, or � if the ieter` endum increasina the mili rate
w_as a ro�•ed afler the most recent issue of bonds to which increment from the
district is led¢ed. If clause �Ij or � a lies the authoritv must annua�iy p_a'y
to the school district an amount of inerement e ua! to the increment that is
attributable to the increase in the mill rate under the referendum. If clause �
a lies u�on a ro�•al �_a maiority vote of the o�•ernin bodv of the munici.
aA IiIY and ihe school board. the authoritv must pa� to the school district an
amount of increment e ual to the increment that is attributabte to the increase
in the mill rate undcr the referendum, The amounts of these increments maY be
ex ended and must be treated � the school district in the same manner as
rovided for the re�•enues deri�•ed trom the rcfcrendum le�ti a ro�•ed �v the
votccs.
Sec. 25. tifinnesota Statutes 1987 Supplement, s�ction 469.179. is amended
to read:
469.179 EYIS?I\G PROJECI'S.
Subdi�ision 1. EJ�:►iP'IiON. The pro��sions of sections 469.174 to 469.178
shall not af%ct any project tor w•hich tax increment certification �as requested
pursuant to law prior to August 1� 1979, or any project carried on by an
suthority pursuant to section 469.033, subdi�•ision S, with «spect to µ•hich the
go��erning bodZ has by resolution designated properties for inclusion in the .
dislrict prior to August 1, 1979. ezcept:
(1) as otherwise expressly provided in sections 469.174 to 469.178; or
(2) as an authority elects to proceed w�th an existing district. under the
provisions ot sections 469.174 to 469.178; or
(3) ti}et ea7 e�a+'6�++�� ef t�he �eeLrn�p}!+e eree e�' e�
�+�+y �e�r +r:ere-
ri+�e�r! �r� d+�triet �rbseq�t*t ie ��t �; }�9�9; s�f} be �� t+t
ee�eer�cr�ee wlt� ee+� yhe}} �bj�eet t�e preper4� ed�e� ni s ressr:4 e� t�re r.�e�sLe_
�t {° � �� � �'� ��� �4 �e 464-F=$ as rovided �
subdivision 2; or
�4� ��'+t "'� � P�ri�k is+ �952; uction 469.177� subdi�•ision
3. clause (b)� sha11 apply to all development districts created punuant to �iinne-
sota Sututa 1978, chapter 472A, or any special law, prior to August 1. 1979.
rsw 1anYua�e fs iodinted br underline. ddeBons bT priieew,
B-1
��
EXHIBIT B
�gg� . UWS of 1�SINIESOTA tor 1988 Ch. 719. An. 12
Subd. 2. APPLICATIOV TO E�IS'fI�G DISTRICCS. ICthe de�•el_oament
or rede��do�:ncnt acti��itv w�ithin the rp oiect or district of a tax inczement
financin r� oieci ccnifi�d oriot to Aueust 1j 1979. is extended bevond the sco
of acti.itv set forth in the district's reQe�•elopment plan unCer Tiinnesota Stat-
utes, chz�ter <62, or T4innesota Statut�s, chaoter a724, if a��licable, afier !�, iav
1 1958, ihe xuthorit must w�ith re¢zrd to the new acti�•itv contorm to the
pro�isio::s of sections 469.174 to 469.178 �*ith the followin exce�tions.
� Seetio� �69.175, subdi.•isio� 3 vanaraphs � and � shall not 2pDiv.
Funher,nore, the pro��sions of section 473F.02, subdi�•ision 3 shall continue to
aoolv to the entire district, if aoalicable,
b� Section 469.177, subdi�ision 3 shall not apvlv.
Sec. 26. CIlY OF �'IRGIIIA TA.� I:�CRE:�iE�? FI,tA.1CIKG DIS-
'TRICT; PARCEIS I1CLliDED.
Rede��eloDment tax increment financin district r'o. 1 in ente rise zone
de��eloa^ent district J�=o. 3 in the cit of Vir¢inia, is deemed for all purooses
under !�iinnesota Statutes, scctions <69.174 to i69.179 to indude the followin
a� rals of real ro rtv as of June 12, 1984:
� Parcel r_o. 90-124-245 _ EIv 79.2' of Lot 1 and all of Lot j Block 3
0lcott .4ddition;
(2 Parcel �=o. 90.125-247 _ Lot 3 Block j Olcott Addition; and
� Parcel I�_o. 90-125-270 - Lot j Block 3 Olwtt ,�ddition.
Sec. 27. ORIGIti.�I,L ASSFSSED V.�1LL'E.
The ori¢inzl assessed value of the av rcels of real ,D-ppertv described in
sections 24 to ?6 is deemed for all gprxses under :�iinnesota Statutes, s�ctions
469.174 to 469.179 to be the ori¢inal zssessed value of these a�rcels as of June
12. 1984. �
S�c. 38• C.1PTL'RED �SSESSED VALliE.
The artured xssessed �•alue of the oxrceis of rexl ro�ert des_ cribed in
sections 2a to 26 is deemed for all ourvoses under rlinn�sota Statutes, sections
469.174 to :69.1 i 9 to be the increased tssessed �•alue of those aD rcels cor.»uied
in the manner prescrib�d bv !�4innesota Statutes, section :69.177, and in xccord-
ance w�sh soctioas 26 to 28.
See. 29. TRIXSITI0�1 RL'LES•
j,aj Yhe Dro�isions ot seciions 3 61 10• and 14 do not ae 1v to ro sed t:x
inerement finxncin districts tor �•hich the authoritv called for a u� blie heann
in a resolutio� dated Tfarch 23• 1987, and tor w•hich a up blie hearin w'as held
on A�ril 28. 1987. 7'he pro�•isions of �iir.nesota Stxtutes 1987 Su�vl_ ement.
\ew Iu►�nate is iadinted by uaderlin deledoas by Mw''reerw
��
i
I
1
1
I
�I
�'
I
I
,
,
�
.�
� $
R
M
�
U
� �
�
� �
.� �
�w �-�i
A r� �
�
� b
�.+ >
�
6
..,
a �'
� �
� �
a
� �
�
�
�1 JO
� F
A
�
� �
�
�
�
M
�
A
�
i
N I
I
� I
� I
I
,
�
,
a 1
� '
1
i
I
1
1
I
I
I 1
� � 1 � I
I �p 1
.�i N 1 .-1 I
� ; N ;
I I
�O �D
O N
�D V�
� M
`a� a
��
��
rf
�
.�i
\
Z
(�
1 rl
��
i �O
1�
1 �O
\
1 e�i
a =
� I
� 1
�lf 1
s
�°
e�+l
�
� 1
�
� �F Ot I rl ;
rl N 1'�'f 1 {D
NO�� � �p� �
h M�-1 1 N I
� � I' � �
i �
� � n
b � N
r1 t� O
rl O� 1�
ri
��88
��
�$
�
���
N��O
�l�M
rl
\
Z
��
I�
��
i�
I��
I
.N
la
°� �
. j
M ��-1
O '
� �
�
h
N
�
�
�OrDONS � O ; 4�'1�N0�0 � N � !+f
a�e70O t� 1' Arlu�'i0O ' n =�
O� �i e� N i� i M �lf � l� � Ifl � b
I j j j .
NNNNN l��l�l�l�
lV��it�0
a � O �
O� O t� ip!f
� � � O
v .�i
��� a�
����
�� �
���ti
�-1 �-1 N � �
ilitNM�t
ri
\
�
���
'i
��
�
�
�O !V
N �
a a
N U'f .-1 e� O
O� O� O �-1
a�pg��p
At�bO
r .+
����OC3
����
�� �
����
.-I�N�CO
M�tM1tM
M
�
�
���
rl
��
�
�
�O !�
��
O� A
�
M
�
� I
rl
� �
o it � ii
1 � I'
� �1
� ~ �
si a„
� � � il
I N N'
i
� 11
1 �1
p p I 1 11
O S S O I S I N 11
0000 1 O I �A 11
I � O 11
1 1 rl 11
I 1 N 11
1 1 11
v
\ � � �
'i?.Z�
N �D v1 O�
{n �lY � �i
� 1� rl O
O �O �! O�
�E�DMN
rl.i r�
C
`�A��
�� m
�
��a�
PfMY9�
RR�t�!
r1 �-1
� �
� Z
`�
I rl
��
i�0
I�
1
\
.N
I N
��
�
� �
(1) Z�e Refe�'er�uag dc r�ot apply as bo� Were isst� after the refe='�etxi�at.
� (Sectian 3 0� State Statute).
!
I
4L
( 2) The Refez'er�ms do not apply as the le�vies w�es�s ap�av�eci p�i.ac to the date
the district was oe�rtified.
( 3) The 6. 5 portion of the Referen�an dr�es mt apply tuitil taxes payable 1989
as it contirn�es the Refere�dun passed in 1983 �ich was fas 5 y�ears.
RESOLIITION NO. - 1989
A RESOLIITION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMAT88 OF
COSTS THEREOF: WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND
STORM SEAER PROJECT NO. 188
WHEREAB, certain agreements requesting street improvements,
including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix bituminous mat, sewer,
water, storm sewer and other facilities, located as follows:
NORTHCO DRIVE SOIITH OF 73RD AVENIIE
were duly presented to the Council on the 13th day of February,
1989; and
WHEREAB, pursuant to the resolution of the Council adopted February
13, 1989, a report has been prepared with �eference to the
improvement, and this report was received by the Council on
February 13, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Council finds and determines that said agreements
were signed by all owners of real property abutting upon
the street(s) named as the location of the improvement.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the
Council Resolution adopted February 13, 1989.
3. John G. Flora
this improvement.
and estimates of
improvements.
is hereby designated as the engineer for
He shall prepare plans and specifications
costs thereof for the making of such
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
27t1i DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1989.
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
5
.<
��
��
oT
..
,�
�
Y
�
�
�
W
Z
�
�
V
�
0
Z
,
— ,
�= s
8 '
: `
z—o—�—� . � -
e �
�
I! .:�o� K:�iAf , a �
I + rwJ
L-_ :' J � "/ ( , e
_� —� z .I � `'� — I i a
.
� _ � ',. � .
�� � I
L' r ,,,�'' • ^ ; .. • s � ' I I
L I
� ,� � � r
?rr�'_/ � I � , _ `(� I I i
i�
i� i'. � � ti I I a
.. � � ��: ���- -- � ( _
_�N� ; i
, -
_J �� O
� i, i w Q I i �_:
��J \� M � � �'- i 3
�� , � r
s�� ;.. .. � ;� H� .. .. ;!� � �� �� N
.•:i'.:T
�� . M O
I . � ,� �{�ja : . ...... i� R• �o
�P° �•5���',�'.. ���� _=�w
w � �i y ,w
� `j #N �. � 'Zj , ,`i • �. • ; rw��
� ,r P\J1
InC -, • r` \ l
L�� _I !'�O+ I �i � Y, � ��._�
=� ��;:� :: ` � =;I: + � �j '— ; 1 . a � �
`-- + I � i_J '-� -�/ I _
`� I `I �p � ••{ ; ,_ _ _ I -
. . ' �
! �4'. � '...;; �= JO i o
G_ � I ,1 .�1:" . . ' _
�� I » . ... . �L' ' _� �.,,� � za . 1
_ „ ��- , , � �
_J I ir � I �`. . 'I ~u�• �.. ..►
\>- Q � 4 �� 'I I
w I K O .
� M
r J:-\ » • M �-:. s I
�l I � '
.� I � o �
_J I � !,,,_� cu I
, , � - . . . «� .. � 3
,�- � I ' �,� T.-." �
�—� `'1I �N ooa� ��, N i._ .� - f X
, o e.d o �. �_ _ . i N � I w
.,_._ I r � �i � i e
'\ '.�w — \ sF. � • .� - - � i w
� R r` , • ��\�, . r... ,
� � �;~ r� � • - � :
I=f \� �a '
( IO~ '.-- � s _ �
I I= ,`' par\ '� _� �.
I < � \�b \ ti . . .... _':'-: : � «R.
i f � � '
f l- �'\• -'1'-r► _ �- --
� -- •� �� 0� Of If9�_ _ 1 _ M�I►.II.ON '" �
� ��.Ii.LN �J �__L—��_
� ` ' �- ° -- ��-•' b w '�,-,1 - �--- ' '_ �.
,_ , n . , �.. q . . � �-, ' / _ I•-
. � ' r - � ' / l. , � J. . _�_ ..
. . _ 0 � • - � � — -'
5A '
,y_ �
C�
RESOLIITION NO. - 1989
A RESOLIITION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT, APPRODAL OF
PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS:
WATER, SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEIPER PROJECT
NO. 188 �
WHEREAB, the City Council received an agreement from 100 percent
of the property owners whose property is liable to be assessed with
the making of these improvements requesting the construction of
these improvements; and
WHEREAB, Resolution No. - 1989 adopted by the City Council
of the City of Fridley ordered all of these improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the following improvements proposed by Council
Resolutions are hereby ordered to be effected and
completed as soon as reasonably possible, to-wit:
Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base,
hot-mix bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter,
sidewalks, water and sanitary sewer services, storm sewer
systems, and other facilities located as follows:
NORTHCO DRIVE
73RD AVE. SOIITH
That the work involved in said improvements as listed above shall
hereafter be designated as:
WATER, SANITARY S�ER AND STORM SEWER FROJECT NO. 188
2. The plans and specifications prepared by the Public
Works Department for such improvements and each of them,
pursuant to the Council resolutions heretofore adopted,
are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City
Clerk.
The Public Works Director shall accordingly prepare and cause to
be inserted in the official newspaper advertisements for bids upon
the making of such improvements under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three (3)
weeks (at least 21 days), and shall specify the work to be done and
will state that bids will be opened and considered at 11:00 a.m.
on the 29th day of MARCH, 1989, in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed
with the Public Works Director, and accompanied by a cash deposit,
bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for five percent
(5�) of the amount of such bid. That the advertisement for bids
for AATER, SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 188 shall be
substantially in standard form.
Resolution No. - 1989
Page Two
PA83ED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
27TH DAY OF FEBRIIARY, 1989.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK
sA
RESOLIITION NO. - 1989
RESOLIITION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND
BPECIFICATIONB AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS TBEREOF: STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 18 - 1989 adopted on the 13th day of
February, 1989, by the City Council, ordered the preliminary plans,
specifications and estimates of the costs thereof for the
improvements in this project.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the following improvements proposed by Council
Resolution No. 18-1989 are hereby ordered to be effected and
completed as soon as reasonably possible, to-wit:
Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix
bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and
sanitary sewer services, storm sewer system, and other facilities
located as follows:
NORTHCO DRIVE 73RD AVE. SOOTH
That the work involved in said improvements as listed above shall
hereafter be designated as:
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1
2. That the work to be performed under this project may be
performed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable
upon receipt of bids.
3. That the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, City Hall,
Fridley, Minnesota, is hereby designated as the Engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare final plans and specifications for
the making of such improvements.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
27TIi DAY OF FEBROARY, 1989.
WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
�
7
' ���
�
:�-,-,i�..- ' �::'" ,'�.v,;.���, �„. _,' .
.: . _ , � . �
.�, --,.- - � _-�, _- n, .
, , ' " ' � -, . . • � � Y
,....._._ - ...__.�__ -- �1
- �. _
_ —T-- — — —..- - . r : � - Ns.,,��� � l
�..__ No•nv�-w_ � r-' �'6l1.��` 90�0 yrf ?� -
� �7
� IYtY�
rT•Y �
a ;
� I �
� ( I
'� I i N
:° �
: �
� �
_ �' c'�'
i
I I ..�..
I,s
; I '
� I
_ � �
, ��
•��-11� ...
Nup� , ��
�p �O
� ±yy »�
w �:
� P . �
� '
_, �
s Ie
w �
°w
I
E I/ �
i I
� � a
� �
e
� j
) � f
� (
� I
�
��J
i �
�
,
0
�,
O • s:
C °:
s
� r
7 �
� . \ *3\?�\ � � ZI I
�
` \ � ' \ - -i O I
O \ I I
N
� � �� 1 � i
v'.*J�.� C,�I�pI I
f\'J / � • " uo \ �
� _ � •� v� � R.jOdpp" ��itA I • c!''�- .
- , _� N �,, .. � — ': ,�
.,'! . � ~ (' � � - .-,
.;L I� I r� i i
� 'w� r_
w �� ; �= I-.��
�: I
� : _�:,..
'`°;;.. n : I ,= -<:
.eay1. ' � I, �
�, � '•. ni I - �
. �"� • ,� _ �+., ( I I ��
'- �' '�' 1 ; i
--� ', •riy.� ` �� � � �� I i
l J\ r, � � �� I o I, _`— i-�
�=, s3 =I��� ,,,��� —
� _ ,� � o �: ,.
N ' i • «.�1,
1J � . � � oY�' , -
�_; , - __ "� `� � �
- �`i�,
: . ���'Q � � _ � � . r
v �. � +�• � ' �Y�U%T/ Y "` �_ .
�LYp��. .. 4 \� ifr:i.�.•
., _'
,: w -- :�.
��
�1/ � '� r. ♦ (-�-+
'� ! \ O 1� �J � ' I
. � �I`,�_
--, , ; -
� -- ;, ..
d � � �.
� `� � � I _ � <1
� 1 i ' � I � '' :':.'' •
/—
�! �, � I ' . ��
l .. • � _�
.: � Y I � � %�
.� � I ( -�
� - r�� I � � a.—J ` )
� .�;.:.� _
�r � =i_1
_ I
- - -- , �
�
Z
�
�
--i
C7
O
C
�
rn
c,ii
D
�\I
�
�
H
Z�
ot�
*�
�
��
Dt
7A
��3
�
�
cinroF
F��e�
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
C011IWlUNITY DEVELOPMENT'
DEPART'MENT
M EMO RAN D UM
William Burns, City Manager
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
February 23, 1989
REGARDING: Proposed Amendment to Developm2nt Agreement -
vantage Companies
Vantage Companies is proposing a change in the language of the
Development Agreement between the City of Fridley and the Vantage
Companies (see the attached letter from Thomas Roberts, Vantage
Campanies Vice President and Manager of Minneapolis Retail
Division). This item will appear on the City Council agenda on
February 27, 1989.
Section 4.4 of the Development Agreement dated March 17, 1986,
states: "Uses. It is agreed that on the Southeast Parcel there
shall not be Zocated or constructed any business or building that
engages in automotive or motor vehicle repairs or services, or that
sells gasoline, fuels or motor vehicle parts."
Vantage Companies would like to develop a 9,200 square foot
shopping center on the 1.41 acre parcel located in the immediate
northwest corner of 81st Avenue and University Avenue. A Texaco
"C" store, with gas pumps, would occupy 2,600 square feet of the
Center (see attached site plan). The Texaco store would be owned
and operated by John Martinson of Fridley.
David Newman was present at the meetings when Section 4.4••was
discussed, and in fact drafted this languaqe. It is his opinion
that the proposed Texaco convenience store represents the type of
use the Council intended to prevent. Staff reasoning was that this
type of activity is less desirable in exterior appearance due to
the presence of pumps, refuse containers, outside canopies and the
outside display of inerchandise. We think it was the former City
Manager's belief that the HRA was spendinq a considerable amount
of money ($150,000) on the major Vantage parcels for the purpose
of achieving a quality exterior appearance. He did not want this
effort interfered with by havinq the type of deve2opment that is
now proposed. We also believe that a clear reading of this section
legally prohibits the type of proposed use.
: '
Vantage Companies
February 23, 1989
Page 2
Staff inet with Mr. Roberts on February 22, 1989. At that time, he
indicated that he would consider modifying the site plan to place
the pumps and parking on the frontage road, on the far side from
University Avenue N.E. to minimize the visual impact. In the event
that the Council does decide to allow this use, the City Attorney
advises that the Council identify the reasons why the contract
should be amended for the proposed request. He cautions the
Council, though, that he does not believe that any level of
hardship could be established to support the developer's request
since there are numerous alternative uses for the property to be
put to.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council deny the amendment request.
However, should the Council consider amending the contract to allow
the proposed use, the Council should direct staff to prepare
alternative language for consideration at a future meeting.
JR/dn
M-89-104
�=—
anta e
g
Minneapolis Division
January 10, 1989
C1 �
11095 YWng Drive. Sufte 260 • Eden Pra�ie. MN 55344 •(612) 944-1000 • FAX (612) 829-3816
Ms. Barbara Dacy
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
RE: Development on the Corner of 81st & University Avenue
Dear 8arbara:
As you are aware, Vantage is contemplating the development of an approximately
9,200 square foot shopping center on the corner of Slst Street and University
Avenue in Fridley. Enclosed is a copy of a preliminary site plan.
At your suggestion, you felt we should discuss this development with the City
Council of Fridley because of an existing agreement we signed with the City o�
the 7th day of April, 1986. More specifically, Section 4.4 Uses on page 4-2
of the Agreement. This section reads as follows:
Section 4.4 Uses. It is agreed that on the Southeast Parcei there
shall not be o ac ted or constructed any business or building that
engages in automotive or motor vehicle repairs or service, or that
sells gasoline fuels or motor vehicle parts.
The "Southeast Parcel" is the property on which Vantage is planning the 9,200
square foot development.
It was our understanding that the City Council did not want to see a
freestanding gas station, muffler shop, tune-up shop, etc., but i�t w as not the
intent of the parties to restrict the Developer from developing a"Quality"
development on this parcel. Our intent is to develop a"Quality" 9,200 square
f oot shopping center on this parcel that would be architectural9y and
aesthetically pleasing and that would compliment the existing Phase I,
Wholesale Club, which we have aiready developed per the aqreement.
The 9,200 square foot shopping center would consist of a 2,600 square foot
Texaco "C" Store owned and operated by John Martinson a resident of Fridley,
3,000 square foot drycleaners cailed "0'Donnell Cleaners" and two to three
additional service type merchants for the remaining 3,600 square feet.
The Texaco Convenience "C" Store would not repair or service motor vehicles
and would not have a car wash as part of their plan. They would have a pizza
takeout, video rental, grocery items and sell gasoline from four pwnps.
• Commercial Real Estate Investors and pevelopers •
a
I�J�J
Ms. Barbara Dacy
City of Fridley
January 10, 1989
Page Two
Vantage f eels that this developmen� would be an asset to the area and would
help in the development process of Phase II of our project. The City Councit
is f amiliar with the quaiity and professionalism that Yantage has shown in the
past and feel that the Fridley City Council should allow this type of
development to occur by clarifying the language of Section 4.4 of our
Agreement.
Sincerely,
VANTAGE PROPERTIES, INC.
� � ��'1�
Tho as G. Roberts
Vice President and Manager
Minneapolis Retail Division
TGR:mpc
Enclosure
�
�
�
�
e
�1�
ss�
�#}
�
'
.
�
�
0
r
�
�r� ��
�i �
�
.
t
t
t
�
�
�
�
�
��
�� �
�
,� ��
�ri� i►re�r.a
� ��
�� g
� "
J
3 ��
� ��
����� ����� � �
� i- ..
�
�
�a���� ��i �
��� �
�
� `
`. !
Virgil C. Herrick
David P. Newman
)ames D. Hceft
Gregg V. Herrick
C•I -�
�.l�:ly:l4��� � s�. ���'ii`��� 1Cei�.
�
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
February 8, 1989
Barbara Dacy
Planning Coordinator
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
RE: Vantage Companies
Dear Barb:
Virgil asked me to respond to your Memo of January 26, 1989.
As I indicated to you earlier, I was present at the meetings
when the language in question was originally discussed. At the
time it was inserted it was Nasim's desire to achieve quality
development on this parcel due to the fact that this parcel was
adjacent to University Avenue. As you know, we made considerable
effort to insure that the exterior appearance of the Wholesale
Club would be attractive. Nasim did not want the visual impact
to be detracted from by a gas station on the corner. As you are
aware, the language contained in Section 4.4 is extremely broad.
I drafted this Ianguage with the specific intention that
excluded any use that relates to automotive service or the
selling of motor fuels. Our reasoning was that this type of
activity is less desireable in exterior appearance due to the
presence of pumps, refuse containers, outside canopies, and the
outside display of inerchandise. I think it was Nasim's belief
that the HRA was spending a considerable amount of money on the
major parcels for the purpose of achieving a quality exterior
appearance. Ae did not want this effort interfered with by
having the type of development that is now propose3.
While I have attempted to give you some background as to the
rationale that they used in imposing this requirement, I also
believe that from a clear reading of this section, it also
legally prohibits the type of proposed use.
In the event that the Council does decide to allow this use,
I believe that this can be treated somewhat differently then you
would a rezoning. The reason is that this is a contract entered
into between the City and the property owner and consequently I
don't believe that the same standard is imposed upon the City in
deciding whether or not to amend the contract in order to permit
Suite 2Q5, fi�01 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, �Llinnesota 55432, 612-571-3850
Barbara Dacy
February 8, 1989
Page Two
this proposed use. However, I would certainZy encourage the
Council to adopt as extensive of findings as they can, Such
findings might include that because there will be no service
bays, car wash bays, or that the selling of gasoline will be a
small percentage of the total activity conducted on the parcel,
that the proposed use will not increase the amount of traffic
circulation and that the Council finds the proposed use
consistent with the overall intent for development. I would
caution you though that I do not believe that any level of
hardship could be established to support the developers request
since there are numerous alternative uses for the property to be
put to.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact
me.
�incerely•, yours,
i ` 1 �, .
; f '�
. ,: ��';
�.� � �
David P. e an
DPN:jeb
��
NJ
�
�
ci�roF
fRlDLEY
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
COl1liMLiNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPART1VlENT
MEMORANDt,[M
February 23, 1989 l
�I'
William Burns, City Manager ��
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Steven Barg, Planning Assistant
Public Hearinq on SAV �89-01, Northtown Nissan
On February 22, 1989, the Planning Commission held an informal
hearing in consideration of the vacation request, SAV �89-01. No
one from the public appeared to speak on this matter. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of SAV �89-01 with the three
stipulations recommended by staff. Minutes are not yet available.
We wanted to establish the public hearing date as soon as possible,
otherwise, the matter could not be heard by the Council until Apri2
(State statutes require a 14 day�publication period).
Staff requests that the City Council set a public hearing for March
20, 1989 on SAV #89-01.
SB/dn
M-89-98
-
� STAFF REPORT
APPEALS DATE
C��QF PLANI�NG COMMISSION DATE Fe»rua� 22, 1989
FRlDLE.Y CITY CODUCJL DATE February 27, 1989 A�THOR j�, �G
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION
SITE DATA
SIZE
DENSITY,,
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
8� ZONWG
UTNT�S
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
COMPATIBILITY WITH
AOJACENT USES 8� ZONNG
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
STAFF RECOMMEI�ATION
APPEALS RECOMMENQATION
PLANNING COMMISStON
RECOMMENDATION
SAV #89-01
WBIIi Rea1tY ��PanY
'Po vacate a 30 ft. street easement
Along the east property lirie of I,�t 3, Blodc 2, East Ranc�
Estates, Se�nd Ac3�ditic�, e�oept the east 200 feet thereof,
c�nerally located southwest of 7810 University Avenue N.E.
'Potal site: 5.0 acres. E�ansi� area: 1.0 acres
N/A
C-3, Ger�eral Shopping
N: C-3; S: C-3; E: Spring Lake Park, C-3, Offioe, Comrer-
cial, and R-5, Niil.tiple Dwellings; W: N�2, Heavy Industrial
y/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Approval with stipulations
. .
SS
Staff Report
SAV #89-01
Page 2
REQUEST
The Petitioner, WBDH Realty Company, is requesting the vacation of
a 30 foot street easement located along the east property line of
Lot 3, Block 2, East Ranch Estates, Second Addition, generally
located southwest of 7810 University Avenue N.E. This vacation
request was one of seven stipulations attached to SP #88-13 which
was approved by Council on October 3, 1988.
BACKGROUND
SP #88-13 was issued to allow Northtown Nissan to expand its
outdoor storage on a one-acre parcel to the south of 7810
University Avenue N.E. This site was affected by a lot split, L.S.
#75-10, which required a street and utility easement along the east
lot line of the property as well as the property to the east. The
City vacated part of this easement in 1987 (SAV #87-04) in
connection with the ABRA development (parcel to the east), but
retained a 30 foot street and utility easement for the site on
which Northtown Nissan later sought expansion.
ANALYSIS
During the October 3, 1988, City Council meeting at which the
special use permit was approved, concern was raised regarding
future access problems if the property were to be sold. The
possibility of those lots to the west becoming "landlocked" was
discussed at that time. City Attorney, Virgil Herrick, explained
that this problem could be avoided if the property in question were
to be combined into one tax parcel. This would require that a lot
split be approved if Nissan wished to sell the property at a future
date, and the question of accessibility could be addressed at that
time. Because the combination has not yet been executed, it is
recommended that the combination be a stipulation of approval.
It is also recommended that the utility easement be retained and
a drainage easement be obtained for the same location.
RECOMMENDATION
�
Staff recommends approval of the requested vacation, SAV #89-01,
to vacate the 30 foot easement for street purposes with the
following stipulations;
1. The parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel prior to
final adoption of the ordinance authorizing the vacation.
2. The easement for utility purposes shall be retained as
currently described.
9C
Staff Report
SAV #$9-01
Page 3
3. The petitioner shall execute a 30 foot drainage easement to
the City for the same location.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the
vacation request with the three stipulations presented by staff.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
The City Council must establish a public hearing for consideration
of the vacation request. State statutes require a 14 day
publication period for vacations. It is recommended that March 20,
1989 be established as the public hearing date. �
3
�
SAV 4f89-Ol
WBDH Realty Co. 9D
4 _ j � � O ' � � � ��
. a .a � ` � -�
� ♦ �� �
s �Z� } 714b � ' �,�� '�y
i.,
� � � ��� ? �,� s � („) • c , �.
•�n.�.r � •� 79�t0 ���,��' ► �
� �r.... . .. � � ��.
i � +� �.
V �-
I Z 4 •
� ' i�j � �� � ,' �`� 1�
� r� �s� ; ' �
' A'�re Ci �, iosrs � � � "" - � 6 � � , /
�IV A� � ( �1�e ii '�•w , � t�'4 _ %"�
i'� -- -� �f '�'y� �1
' �.n s� + � � �s � ����, , ° :
� ts/�r��,/Jr •., ti �.n�w►•o! '— 'ti �;'J� .. �
I � ... � . _.,w ..� � _ ,
.
.,yy� �,,�a ^'�' ' . �;s�e :' _ � ,�•
��1� � S�o ��!- �n) �� 7 it�
r�� � �.1��,
� �s2o -�aea � ' ,�.
(r) (,�� �3 . 7s9a s �. �
8 / g � / �� 3':
7 87f�3� �
! � � , .�w�f�,w�.F s � ,
I �° �
ev i.rwe � � a,
A' �l�+ wr .k IJ'�7 . '�
� 83r _
3 N �
, � z �
l� ` ,Z �fi � i $ � �3) - - 1e -- �
� l> C
$ (��� � � O � � 8 io ��
$� �a ss � � �.
� � <*�
E A � A 5 .,r,� ,
.,r.e „�a.. _ A l,,.r __ � _ � .
��
G (is� 2 j
»qs
��G� _7�03
(!_)
�, o z
'. s` C�� . �
.�
;. � �,,� "'
1
�
G
�»3
c
�
/ N
CN� �'
7 7 8'.f
�
7�03
1��
____ -.�
�s% � 773�
,.. ., I�,-j T" T 7J o :
. I � j�l �lrJ(t) '�
I �� : �a' � �
l�) .._ .. ,.� ..
� �'' 7700 . .
I� r�s� (�)
< eewi�,r.�r. '�,�
� � �.i
nn- �
�
:�
-��..
,.
�
�
� �
� �
;O
� ��
�4
,
�r : T!
^ i
��
�...
G
:
3
u'
8s
_ '- . - ----!_ .__.!
LOCATION MAP
RESOLUTION NO. - 1989
RESOLIITION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANB AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS TBEREOF: STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 8T. 1989 - 2
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 98 - 1988 adopted on the 17th day of
October by the City Council, ordered the preliminary plans,
specifications and estimates of the costs thereof for the
improvements in this project.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the following improvements proposed by Council
Resolution No. 98-1988 are hereby ordered to be effected and
completed as soon as reasonably possible, to-wit:
Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix
bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and
sanitary sewer services, storm sewer system, and other facilities
located as follows:
UNZVER3ITY AVE. WEST 3ERVICE DRIVE 83RD ST. 500 FT. NORTH
That the work involved in said improvements as listed above shall
hereafter be designated as:
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 2
2. That the work to be performed under this project may be
performed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable
upon receipt of bids.
3. That the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, City Hall,
Fridley, Minnesota, is hereby designated as the Engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare final plans and specifications for
the making of such improvements.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THI3
27TH DAY OF FEBRDARY, 1989.
WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
�o
•.
. � . � � . �- � � � 1' $4-�, 1�iA�
� . � . � � . .�
. . . (' . . • ' , r'�i''� � � -'F"'.1. i i�
'. . . ��.` . . � �.
�• . � � .�., � • � . ; ,
, . . . ' ' O ' '
. . . � .
. . � , , Q � .
� � � � . O'Q' 3
l � � �
, ' � � . �
.. . ,' . � . . � • •
� � �. � � ' n� i yG
, � o.EV= e�s. �' Z :�a�.
� • � i������� � �NS�,
,. � '• � � � ,
� . � � ; � TM.2 ,� W .
� i O.EV.=8T6.0 � �,,,,
: ' , �-- �----• � i�:�., '
. � APF'FtOXtMAT'E � 9UILD�IG ' . >
.. 1�CATION 100 X 100 � M,
c
• , �� � . � • ' �
� . � �
. . ,. . , - � ..
� " � � � � 83rd AVE. H.E. . -
� �. .. , , � �
�. �
.. � ■ �
.. , 6.M. W �' �ob no.
' � . . . � . ,, . X-880SJ
� z .
. ,; � , ' � - . � ' dat�
� '; �
� �. . � . •;` • ' S-I�-99
�
, � , '' . -
,.
, . drawn
., � BENCHMMif�� TDP OF HYDRANT. ELEV.s8T9.0� .
'' � � � MJP
', �
• • � ch�ck�d
l � �
1 ,
,
'� � SO1L 1NVESTIGATION $UBTERRANEAN +�+t�t
O�iTNOP�AEDIC C�WIC BU�OINQ � E N G 1 N E E R I N.G�,,�, Q R.P.� •�
� S�'�►�FR10L:E1F:.�:�: MN. M I n n e s o t a
• :Minneapolis. �
�, �T�N Q��� � k"'x "x C O N S U L T I NG S O I L E N G I N E E R S
SURt�EONS .
....._...... -�� _, .
11
RESOLOTION NO. - 1989
RESOLIITION ORDERINQ IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 2, ADDENDIIM #1
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 11-1989 adopted on the 23rd day of January
by the City Council, ordered the preliminary plans, specifications
and estimates of the costs thereof for the improvements in this
proj ect .
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the following improvements proposed by Council
Resolution No. 11-1989 are hereby ordered to be effected and
completed as soon as reasonably possible, to-wit:
Street improvements, including gradinq, stabilized base, hot-mix
bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and
sanitary sewer services, storm sewer system, and other facilities
located as follows:
COMMERCE LANE 73RD AVE. TO OSBORNE RD.
That the work involved in said improvements as listed above shall
hereafter be designated as:
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 3T. 1989 - 2, ADDENDUM #1
2. That the work to be performed under this project may be
performed under one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable
upon receipt of bids.
3. That the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, City Hall,
Fridley, Minnesota, is hereby designated as the Engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare final plans and specifications for
the making of such improvements.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
27TH DAY OF FEBRIIARY, 1989.
WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
� ,rw. ..�
�^� 0
\ awca� .
1
���
'L..� �• r ' �
V ,J .��v. v �:� .., � � e�
�
� l:� � 3 i• �� ;�� ' � '�� ''1 `� ,� � '��!� .^`�.
G V 7 J'� ,�"� ,, �t ��:i 7'7 >
J � )� �..��'i�'�'�•,�)
1�', �' � 3 J .r.
;� � a;a,�..��� , . > 3 A : ���i�
�� 3° � t
�� ..... w,. �
.• , i
�' ��
wa � �
.�
" .
, �1 �
,.� '�� i
a4a ��i
�""" �\ n w.
r ��
i �� _
�', Z��
� c
,',
�
-.��. � f�
\�
.,
3 �•� � 3
`.� IIi
\� � �,�,
„� Cr, I�a yM
:� `"--- �\
�...
\" J 1
t ; ., � �
�3 4..• � �
J J
Qr �[KM�7 .�
`
�
_ '•\ J ,'� �•' Q+�
4
d'� \
/
,r . .� �
° 8
1
,« •' - '�',
���V�00� • A \ 1
�,Oti+�l ���� �� 1
\ ,' �� �'\ ``,� \�,�
�'��.;• � ,
\ w�•
`�« \NNI� e�
4�
��,` .:::.:::::�
b
6
O�
2
>
J
X
O
� �
i m
I �
�
4
0
�
1
�
�
u
1
a -
a .�
.,.� �
'S�
�
�
���
wn .w / �• �
t � •'+
i�
r
0
....�.�
• e�„ r
w. ..
ww C M
w.
,o•,
1M
_
M �.
� � �
��
a �
�J en.i� �s�.�...�
.�e� / � pA'_
�1�i� �
I1w �f ����
,...
� � ..�"
l�� ,
,.1, cc.. �c�.�
� i;; ,% . �
..,:
1 � M LO �w�
\•.
11 I .e..
� , � .ea.<... �.ca...� •
�' ww
� '►600 ....�.
• �!' w7 �J �:1. �� ..��n '
`(F
���� G'
•
yQ i
�a.» ° i
�■o
� J r�aW/
�� �
:�
� s� �
., n w
Ij
�{ �
ij = �
s
i �
�9t'.
11oea M��•e�
„� 11 A
C+�y 11o�N: � 229 t �
CaMay M�: i�.li •..
s�e�• M�r�: �0.�0 1M�••
e.�..�.�..�. .�.. s��
Pel�e� � 9� 1
� Ci/y M�11 071-34•
[�AAP EXPLANATION
�Wk RoN
Iw�ic Re.� r. s. •.s.
---= i�i�at� Ita�
L��7_ fat�r� V►ep��A 110��
= R�ilrea� TrKt�
�••� Cify lawN�ry l��its
� In/M�1�t• Nvy.
❑ MnMaf� Ste» Nrry.
Q Anota CowMy M.y.
100 Naa� NuwMrin'
t dwro�
� NOl��iY) S C�1111�1
� MYeiti�01 eYilain9t
••�P Pa.r•
1
�o Post' Offie�
: ����
:;.�ti a,e�K scnem aoye,+r
������1�� RNaf SCMd Fi�/�i . �
• D'r .
1 �!
•'". ____ '. ' C A' i
-' - " " "'�" ..
� •` "" — ; —
� .. i ...... �w
�.._ �.
...�.
uw rr Mo»
'«...•... w
.., ..... ...<. J �4v �/ ��_
��
� M •� �
��a.�• ry * I�
♦r� �� �
�M ; �
Ar• ` }
J
...a :� � C �...
' . a ii�i�r wu ..
sr +, n �y
1 �� � �- � �
:� • � ►
, . � a..
�' � ,
j ,i _ � . �
�/ � � ! � a -� w. �' 3'; � �'�;
• � . �, .w
7 ,�' � �fOY►WYl �
� � a � � � �.� � � �l
! . I w .3 � � � '„7 � li �
— , ,i. �'��, ..+5^•�
_
.�. ...... � � �' .� "� :� ,"'� . ) � J ��
«w �e�an r �' �� � � 1 �
...«.-- .., �� � �J
i� � � c
''e .. j i a�
i, � ,
�� Q � �
.....w..� � �� �
;! := / /
`2
J� � l� �V� A. !1 .
����.I�s µ
� . . _ . - -- -
s ��
... ...:.
•� n � IOCKE ` Pa
�� .�� `y 8 .v� �, y
�o a..,.« ; � � � 8 �
o dL) 4 ■ s. '� � ., � •
• n} ',� {.t : � � � �.� (� �' � • q L C ?
a • p, � 'a A � 6� p �
O 4
wr * % L1 E% 1
' + •� r�• � � � � O, �+
� '3 a.+ ^ • s 4 v� G J
.�
...
....
....
.' ' • ' � ' � ` J
12
RESOLIITION NO. - 1989
RESOLIITION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND APPROVAL
OF PLANB AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS:
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-1 AND
ST. 1989-2
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 19 - 1989 adopted on the 13th day of
February 1989, by the City Council received the Preliminary
Engineering Report and the petitions for the improvements in Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1.
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 20 - 1989 adopted on the 13th day of
February 1989, by the City Council received the Preliminary
Engineering Report and the petitions for the improvements in Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 2.
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 12 - 1989 adopted on the 23rd day of
January, 1989, by the City Council received the Preliminary
Engineering Report and the petitions for the improvements in Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 2, Addendum #1.
WHEREAS, Resolution No. - 1989 adopted on the day of
, 1989, by the City Council, ordered the improvement and
final plans and specifications and estimates of cost for the
improvements in Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1.
WHEREAS, Resolution No. - 1989 adopted on the day of
, 1989, by the City Council, ordered the improvement and
final plans and specifications and estimates of cost for the
improvements in Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 2.
WHEREAS, Resolution No. - 1989 adopted on the day of
, 1989, by the City Council, ordered the improvement and
final plans and specifications and estimates of cost for the
improvements in Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 2,
Addendum #l.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution
No. 18 - 1989 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as
soon as reasonably possible, to-wit: Northco Drive
2. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution
No. 98 - 1988 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as
soon as reasonably possible, to-wit: 83rd Ave. 500 feet north
3. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolution
No. 11 - 1989 are hereby ordered to be effected and completed as
soon as reasonably possible, to-wit: Commerce Lane�(73rd Avenue
to Osborne Road)
RESOLUTION NO. - 1989
Page Two
Street improvements, including grading, stabilized base, hot-mix
bituminous mat, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, water and
sanitary sewer services, storm sewer system, and other facilities
located as follows:
NORTHCO DRIVS
83RD AVENLTE 500 FEET NORTH
COMMERCE LANE (73RD AVENIIE TO OSBORNE ROAD)
That the work involved in said improvements as listed above shall
hereafter be designated as:
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1& 2
4. The plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works
Department for such improvements and each of them pursuant to
the Council resolutions heretafore adopted, a copy of which
plans and specifications are hereto attached and made a part
thereof, are hereby approved and shall be filed with City
Clerk.
The Public Works Director shall accordingly prepare and cause to
be inserted in the official newspaper advertisements for bids upon
the making of such improvements under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published for (3) three
weeks (at least 21 days) , and shall specify the work to be done and
will state the bids will be opened and considered at 11:00 A.M. ON
THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989, in the Council Chambers of the City
Hall and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed
with the Public Works Director and accompanied by a cash deposit,
bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for five percent
(5�) of the amount of such bid. That the advertisement for bids
for STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 shall be
substantially in the standard form.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRTDLEY THIS
29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1989.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
12A
.�Xs; „a���
�� �\\
�
r_�
�;���►
POLICE DEPARTMENT
City of Fridley
Minnesota
DATE JANUARY 26, 1989
FROM PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR, J.P.
SUBJECT
RESOLUTION FOR COUNCIL ACTION
r�
�
�
..
M�VIORANDUM
TO
BILL BURNS A r1'
ACTION INFO
XXX
Enclosed is a resolution authorizing execution of a loan agreement
with the State of Minnesota for portable breath testing instruments.
It is requested that this resolution be placed on the February "
27, 1989 council agenda.
This is basically a house keeping item with the last resolution
on the same subject passed on the 27th of February 1984.
The resolution provides the legal framework for the State of
Minnesota to provide the City of Fridley with a protable breath
test instrument utilized in pre-screening suspected drunk drivers.
JPH/sa
RESOLIITION NO. - 1989
RESOLIITION AOTHORIZING E$ECIITION OF A LOAN AGREEMENT WITH
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR PORTABLE BREATH TESTING INSTRIIMENTB
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety
(hereinafter referred to as "DPS"j has received grants of money
through section 402 of the�Federal Highway and Traffic Safety Act
of 1966 or through other sources for the purchase of preliminary
breath test instruments; and
WHEREAS, DPS desires to provide a mechanism through which local law
enforcement agencies may use these preliminary breath test
instruments to assist them in the detection of drivers who are in
violation of Minnesota laws relating to traffic and highway safety.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley enter into
an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public
Safety for the purpose of receiving from the State of Minnesota,
Department of Public Safety, preliminary breath test instruments
on a loan basis for use by law enforcement officers to assist in
the detection of motorists who may be in violation of Minnesota
Statutes Section 169.121, or local ordinances in conformity
therewith.
PASSED.AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1989.
WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK
l[�1�'
14
�
MEMO TO: THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ��.
FROM: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: CLEAN INDOOR AIR (NO SMOKING.j POLICY FOR
THE RENOVATED MUNICIPAL CENTER
DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1989
Attached please find a draft of a"Clean Indoor Air Policy for the
Renovated Municipal Center" which stops just short of declaring the
renovated buildinq a completely smoke free area. I welcome your
comments, suggestions, and reactions to this proposal.
At this moment it is my intention to place consideration of a
motion approving this no smoking policy for the renovated Municipal
Center on the agenda of the February 27, 1989 meeting of the City
Council.
i4A
MEMO TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ALL CITY EMPLOYEES
WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER
MARCH 3, 1989
CLEAN INDOOR AIR POLICY FOR RENOVATED MUNICIPAL CENTER
In recent years it has become increasingly evident that tobacco
smoking poses serious health problems. According to James Kelsey,
MedicaZ Director for Northwestern Bell in 1986, "Smoking is a
direct cause of emphysema as well as cancer of the mouth, throat
and lungs. Smoking has also led to an increase in respiratory
diseases, such as chronic bronchitis; and vascular diseases, such
as strokes and heart attacks."
smoking is a problem for non-smokers as well as smokers. According
to the Surgeon General, C. Everett Koop, "it is now clear that
disease risk due to the inhalation of tobacco smoke is not limited
to the individual who is smoking, but can extend to those who
inhale tobacco smoke emitted into the air."
For the past twenty years every package of cigarettes has carried
a warning about the dangers of smoking. In 1975 the Minnesota
State Legislature passed the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act
(Minnesota Statutes 144.411 to 144.417) "to protect the public
health, comfort and environment by prohibiting smoking in public
places and at public meetings except in designated smoking areas."
On a positive note the Wellness Program for City Employees has
provided an incentive for non-smokers.
As we prepare for occupancy of
Center, it is important that we
appears to be an opportune time
building which incorporates the
of inedical knowledge.
the renovated Fridley Municipal
keep these facts in mind. This
to initiate a policy for the new
letter of the law and the spirit
Accordingly, in recognition of the fact that the City of Fridley
has an interest in encouraging healthy lifestyles among its
employees and to assure that the City of Fridley is in compliance
with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act, the following policy shall
be effective with the occupation of any newly constructed or
renovated areas of the Municipal Center:
Tobacco smoking shall not be permitted in any portion of the
Municipal Center with one exception: The apparatus floor in
the Fire Department will be designated as an area where
smoking is permitted.
For purposes of this policy, smoking includes carrying a lighted
cigar, cigarette, pipe or any other lighted smoking equipment.
e
All City Employees
March 3, 1989
Page 2
Employees who now smoke and wish to cease smoking are encouraged
to take advantage of the smokinq cessation programs sponsored by
their health care providers. A list of other smokinq cessation
programs, some of them free of charge, is available upon request
from the Personnel Division of the City Manager's Office (ext. 123,
152, or 153).
In addition, the Employee Wellness Program established June 5,
Z985, is hereby amended to read as follows:
In lieu of 1.5 wellness days off, once a calendar year the
City will reimburse a permanent employee up to $l00 for a
membership in a health or fitness club or smoking cessation
program for the permanent employee or a fam�.ly member. A
paid-on-call firefighter may receive similar reimbursement
for earning points equivalent to 1.5 days off.
Your cooperation in
healthy environment
Municipal Center.
WWB:ch
observing this policy will help to create a
for all those who work in or visit the Fridley
. �
1�
�s
�a
N
:aa
�^
�
�
H
E-
�
W
� �
U �O
< �
a�r,-�
E� • (�
� �
O C --+
t� O
'r� �..'
� � �
'%l0a
a � �
A o. E�-�
X < �
OWC �. U
�o -.,
a a. o
wM
U
U
M
i
�
U
��
<�
�- ��
F �
<
a
x
>-
E^
H
U
m;
,
m,
�,
�, ,
,
�; �
� �
V� I
�
� �
N i
�
i
i
B �
m �
�
� �
N � �0 �
..�a a � �
a n�
� �
� �
I
I I
I � I
I m I
I (V I
i .-� i
� �- a � �
i E- < •� i
I M '.� � �
I C� C!1 �0 i
i . i
i N i
i N i
i i
i i
i i
1 �
1 �
I �
� x
� W O �
� GC E- N
1 M <
1 � (n �
i �N
�
1 B
�
� �
i a N
i �-Vi F Oi
� > ae �
1 M W I�
i U U .
� N
� �
1 �
1 �
��
U.� 0�<C
0. � �
E- i O
� i V
O �
V � �
� <
� �
� �,
i c�
1 M
�a
�o
z�
o�
c� �, �
w E- �
a c� �
cn w �
u� �
mmmmm�m��mmm�
mmmm�mm��m���
mmmmmmmm��mm�
������������►�
F%
�
�
i��l
Z
�
�
�
z
O
z
J
f-+
F
_
�
G
�
G
1�
"�
�
a
�..
�
t�t
[—
O
Z
Y
s
C�
fJI
�+]
[�
e
�
�
F
N
�
�
�
E�
m;
��
m �
m i
i
� i
�
�
UF
�
�
m
m
I �
� m
i �
�;
,
�,
�,
�,
�,
N �
� �
. 1
� i
t1/ �
i
i
i
i
m �
� �
�
� �
a�0 �
�
� ,
� u�i �
� �n �
i N i
I (�y 1
I
I I
I 01 I
1 � I
1 . I
� N i
� .� i
i N i
i � i
i � i
I � I
i C1 i
i i
i i
i
i
i
1
1 �
1 B
�
� vi
� �
� �
i
t N
i �
� .�
� 11/
i t�p
i
i �
I �
�
i t�ri
1 �
� �
�$a
,
„
„
„
�„
�„
�„
.„
�„
�n
I n
11
I u
. �
0
u
u
ii
ia
i �
u
iu
I n
1 ��
. ��
� ��
i ��
i ��
1 11
11
11
11
11
i 11
� 11
. tl
�u
,u
� u
u
� u
. u
. 11
.0
� u
h u
n
u
u
11
� 11
, 11
. a
� a
) o
� u
.0
, 11
) i�
� u
�► u
u
u
� 11
o n
u
D ��
M ��
V o
u
V��
D ��
.0
� u
ry u
d' N
�Ilt F
x
z w
U ` �
H t!� [s,.
..] �
O. O O
G. H F
t >
W fal
a• a c�
< a x
n, <
J
`
m
Engineenng
Sewer
Watcr
Parks
Slreelti
Mamten,�nce
MEMORANDUM
.
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�l�� PW89-36
.
FROM: John G. F1ora,fPublic Works Director
DATE: February 24, 1989
SIIBJECT: Fridley Municipal Center
Improvement Praject Na. 189
Change Order No. 5
This past week, Proposal Requests No. 51 and 53 have been received
and processed by Kraus-Anderson. The change order is summarized
below:
Change Order No. 5: Proposal Req,uest #51 - adding restrooms to the
employee lunch area for an estimated cost of
$25,000.00.
Proposal Request #53 - relocating Fire
Department air compressor from lunch area for
an estimated cost of $6,000.00.
CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 TOTAL: $31,000.00
Since these changes are beyond the original scope of the renovation
project, they should be considered as an additional budget
authorization of $31,000.00.
Recommend the City Council approve Change Order No. 5 for a not to
exceed amount of $31,000.00.
JGF/BN/ts
Attachments
��
-r-
•
i'. �
Eng�neenng
Sewer
VVdICt
Parks
Stree�5
Mci�nlCnance
MEMORANDUM
�'�.
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �. PW89-41
FROM: John G. F1ora,YPublic Works Director
DATE: February 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Sales Tax Savings
Our Project Manager, Tom Sackett, for the Fridley Municipal Center
Improvement Project #189 has informed us that a substantial savings
can be achieved by eliminating the sales tax for some of the
materials and services still to be procured and applied to the
proj ect .
Since this sales tax reduction could amount to a considerable
savings to the overall cost of the project, it is staff's
recommendation that the Council authorize the Mayor and City
Manager to modify the existing contracts, where appropriate in
order to achieve a cost reduction for the materials and services
to be received.
JGF/ts
19A
I-
•
�� �