The URL can be used to link to this page

03/20/1989 - 5386E , RICR PRIBYL FINANCE DIRECT(3R COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 20, 1989 -� , �� a. ,. - �: ;. �, � �`� > - _ [ ;, ,�: ,�, . , � � � - , � a Y _ . � . . . �if".�. n: _ X, :' l +� ' _ . � . . . �-' � � F; I II W_ � .. . .�_.. ._.. . .._ . . � '�b ... i .. . .. � anrc� FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING F�D� ATTENDENCE SHEET MONDAY MARCH 20 , 1989 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ��ITEM PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER ��! � �C.. l f �.% ��\ � l, �� " ?� Z �S Gv . ��ZL GC� !� L�r� � 7 �r"1�L�'Z l - 7 � / � Pt1 %/_`� v ��/�P.�IJi�P_�-iJ �'�1-r -;d /.v, ' ;�ro../a;�yz i /I� / �� - � � / %�=�?�_� /��7 C. �� G��v�t:� ,�`�G /��,�OGS � zx /% / i� �,!��1 �'�. �� f J %`-� �� b-/'t 1.�L.� �� S �'^'��1 �- ��r� � •tiL�� 6S 3 Y�l:�� , _ 'tv ��. �6 � b K �.c�� %��l/ ��' �� ,� , � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL F�� MARCH 20, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: PREBENTATION OF AWARDS OR PROCLAMATIONS; Fair Housing Month - April, 1989 APPROVAL OF MINIITEB: Council Meeting, February 27, 1989 Council Meeting, March 6, 1989 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORUM. VIBITORB: . (Consideration of items not on agenda - 15 minutes) POBLIC HEARING: Public Hearing on a Vacation, SAV #89-01, by WDBH Realty Company for Northtown Nissan .. 1- 1 I OLD BIISINE88: Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #$$-15, by Community Development Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : 2 - 2 M Council Meeting, March 20, 1989 OLD BOSINESS (CONTINIIED): Page 2 Consideration of Appointments to City Commissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 A NEW BIISINE88: Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 4.06 of the Fridley City Charter . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 E Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Rezoning, ZOA #88-04, by Community Development Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5 K Consideration of Eliminating a Condition of Approval of VAR #88-26, by Stylmark, Inc. 6536 Main Street N.E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 K Consideration of Amending MPCA Substate Agreement for the Moore Lake Restoration Project and Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the Agreement on Behalf of the City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7 D Consideration of Approving and Correcting Change Orders No. 1, 2 and 3 for the Fridley Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189 .. 8- 8 F Council Meeting, March 20, 1989 NEW BIISINE88 (CONTINDED): Page 3 Consideration of Change Order No. 6 for the Fridley Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 D Consideration of Receiving Bids and Awarding the Contract for Lake Pointe Development Maintenance Project No. 187 . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 B Consideration of Receiving Bids and Awarding the Contract for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989-10 (Sealcoat) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11 B Consideration of Receiving Bids and Awarding the Contract for 1989 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project ....... 12 - 12 B Consideration of a Resolution Supporting Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) Funding for Street Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13 A Consideration of a Resolution Opposing the Testing Surcharges Proposed by the Minnesota Department of Health . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14 C Council Meeting, March 20, 1989 Page 4 NEW BIISINE88 (CONTINt1ED): Consideration of a Resolution Anthorizing the Posting �f "No Parking" Signs on Both Sides of University Avenue West Service Drive Drive (M.S.A.S. 341) in the Area of the Turning Lar�e Immediately North of 83rd Avenue . 15 - 15 B Consideration of a Resolution Imposing Load Limits on Public Streets and Highways in the City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 C Consideration of a Resolution in Support of Children's Agenda . . . . . . . . . . 17 Receiving the Minutes of the Charter Commission Meeting of January 30, 1989 ..... 18 - 18 H Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 - 20 C Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21 E Adjourn: THE MINIJT$S OF T8R FRIDLBY CITY CODNCIL 8$HRII7ilRY Z7, 1989 !i ; � ._� : �' � , , , I , i � � � I I , , II ; � , i � i - � �, � , i ,I , , , . � , ,I � THE MINIITEB OF THE REGIILAR ME$TING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF FEBRIIARY 27, 1989 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:45 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billings MEMBERS ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, FEBRUARY 13. 1989: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: The following item was added to the agenda: (20) Consideration of Receiving Bid and Awarding Contract for Hollow Metal Doors for the Police Detention Facility. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: There was no response from the audience under this item of business. PUBLIC HEARING• 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON A FINAL PLAT P S. #88-03, GLACIER PARK COMPANY ADDITION BEING A REPLAT OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 3. AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 79. GENERALLY IACATED_AT 5110 MAIN STREET N.E.. BY API SUPPLY COMPANY: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27 1989 PAGE 2 Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:50 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this request involves the replat of a portion of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 79, generally located at 5110 Main Street N.E. She stated the replat is needed in order for the petitioner to mortgage their building located at this site. Ms. Dacy stated the property is about 18 acres and zoned M-2. She stated the property was originally owned by Burlington Northern, Inc. and recently sold to Glacier Park Company. She stated Glacier Park Company will own both of the lots to be subdivided, but will lease the northern lot (Lot 1) to API Supply Company and the other lot will be vacant. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of this lot split with two stipulations regarding the park fee and a bikeway/walkway easement. No persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed plat. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS• 2. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT. L.S. #88-07 TO CREATE A SEPARATE PARCEL FROM AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 94 TO BE DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 140.00 FEET OF THE WEST 150.00 FEET OF LOT 7 SUBDIVISION OF IAT 10 EXCEPT THE WEST 75 00 FEET THEREOF GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1300 SKYWOOD COURT N.E. BY WILLIAM SHIELDS: (TABLED 2/13/89): AND RESOLUTION NO. 23-1989 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION LOT SPLIT L.S. #88-07, TO CREATE A SEPARATE PARCEL FROM AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 94 TO BE DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 140.00 FEET OF THE WEST 150.00 FEET OF LOT 7, SUBDIVISION OF LOT 10, EXCEPT THE WEST 75.00 FEET THEREOF GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1300 SKYWOOD COURT N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated it was discovered at the last meeting that this parcel to be split would need a variance as the lot would only be 75 feet wide, instead of the required 80 foot width for a corner lot. She stated this lot split was previously approved in 1964, but was never recorded and is again before the Council for consideration. Ms. Dacy stated the Chairman of the Planning Commission was contacted to determine if the question of the five foot variance should be submitted to the Planning Commission. She stated he did FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27. 1989 PAGE 3 not feel it was necessary. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this lot split with three stipulations which she outlined and are attached to the resolution as Exhibit A. Councilman Billings stated one of his concerns is if there ,is enough space, when the driveway is moved onto the larger lot, for ingress on the east side. Mr. Shields stated he may have to trim a tree, but he has plenty of room. He stated he did not feel the line was correct and knew where his driveway was located and would move it off. Councilman Billings stated one of the main reasons he requested this item be tabled at the last meeting was because if the lot split was approved, it would create a substandard lot. He stated after much thought and another look at the site, it seems the most logical thing to do is to approve this lot split with the 75 foot lot because it is the highest and best use of that particular piece of property. Ms. Dacy stated the proposed lot does function as a separate lot and because an adequate buildable area is achievable, denying the variance would be forcing under-utilization of the subject property. She stated granting the five foot variance would not be causing an overcrowded condition. Ms. Dacy stated the subdivision ordinance permits the Council to grant a variance to the ordinance requirements if the variance would not be contrary to the intent and purpose of the subdivision ordinance or other applicable regulations. She stated the City Attorney has reviewed this application and agrees with the staff's analysis. MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 23-1989 approving L.S. #88-07 and, further, to grant the five foot variance to reduce the lot width from 80 to 75 feet. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 920 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING APPENDIX F TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADJUSTMENT OF SALARIES FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2.07 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and adopt Ordinance No. 920 on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINE5S: FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989 PAGE 4 4. CONSIDE�2ATION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO TURN BACK REFERENDUM LEVIES: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated th�s agreement with the School Districts has been drafted by Mr. James O'Meara. He stated it is in regard to turning back referendum levies in conjunction with tax increment districts. He stated the agreement provides some safety in regard to the inclusion of the City's pre-1979 Districts. He stated if a future court decided the pre-1979's were not to be included in this type of return, the agreement allows for the return of those levies back to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Mr. Pribyl stated the agreement has been previously discussed with the Council and approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority at their last meeting. He stated the HRA requested the agreement be forward to the Council for approval. He stated if Council approves the agreement, it would be submitted to each of the School Districts for their approval. Mr. Pribyl stated if the agreement is executed, the City when receiving tax settlements would forward the School Districts' portions to them. He stated there may, however, be some delinquencies. He stated the return to the School Districts which includes taxes payable in 1988 are as follows: School District #li, $4,711.25; School District #13, $5,754.92 and School District #14, $56,013.08 or a total of $66,4'79.24. He stated the estimates for 1989 are as follows: School District #11, $4,711.25; School District #13, $5,754.92 and School District #14, $104,067.80 or a total of $114,533.97. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated he has spoken with Dr. Rens in regard to this agreement and it meets with his approval. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into agreements with School Districts No. 11, I3, and 14 for the return of tax increment monies. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jim Furgason, Chairman of the School Board for District �14, expressed his thanks to the Council in working through this process. He stated it has been a long process for both the City and School Board and appreciated the Council's action. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 24-1989 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: WATER SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 188: �RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27. 1989 PAGE 5 Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this resolution is to approve the final plans and specifications for water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer for the Northco plat. MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 24-1989. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. RESOLUTION NO. 25-1989 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: WATER. SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 188: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 25-1989. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. �tESOLUTION NO. 26-1989 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-1: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this resolution pertains to the streets for the Northco plat. MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 26-1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR VANTAGE COMPANIES: Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated the City entered into a development agreement with Vantage Companies in March of 1986 for parcels of land between 81st and 83rd Avenues on the west side of University. He stated Section 4.4 of the development agreement states "that on the southeast parcel there shall not be located or constructed any business or building that engages in automotive or motor vehicle repairs or services or that sells gasoline, fuels or motor vehicle parts." He stated Vantage Companies would like to develop a 9, 200 square foot shopping center on that parcel containing a Texaco "C" store, with gas pumps, which would occupy 2,600 square feet of the center. Mr. Robertson stated in researching the background, Mr. Newman, Assistant City Attorney, was contacted as he was present when this language was drafted. He stated he is of the opinion that the proposed Texaco convenience store represents the type of use the Council intended to prevent. Ae stated it is staff's opinion the present language clearly prohibits this type of proposed use. He stated if the Council wishes to allow this use, the development agreement would have to be amended. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989 PAGE 6 Mr. Tom Roberts, Vice President and Manager of the Minneapolis Retail Division for Vantage Companies, stated Texaco approached Vantage Companies to construct a convenience store with gas pumps and a canopy on their site at 81st and University. He stated he is not here to debate the language in the development agreement, but to obtain input from the Council. He stated the proposed convenience store would occupy about 2,600 square feet or 25 percent of the total development of this shopping strip. He stated they intend to construct buildings that are aesthetically pleasing and harmonious to the area. He stated a cleaners is proposed to be located in this center and there would be room for about three other tenants. Mr. Roberts stated before Vantage Companies proceeded any further, they wished to determine what the Council foresees for this property. Councilman Billings stated he was not a member of the Council at the time the development agreement was executed, but has done extensive research on this question. He thanked Vantage Companies for approaching the Council before proceeding with any final plans. He stated the Council is trying to get away from automotive type businesses along University Avenue as it is the City's '�Main Street." Councilman Billings stated the HRA is proposing a considerable amount of improvements along University Avenue which will be beneficial to the City. Mr. Roberts stated he felt a shopping strip would be more aesthetically pleasing than, for instance, a free-standing restaurant on this outlot and would allow a broader tax base. Councilman Billings stated he did not have a problem with a cleaners or convenience store, as long as there is no selling of gasoline. He stated it may not be economically feasible today to construct a strip mall, without the sale of gasoline, but this situation may change. He stated developers are in the market for today, but whatever is constructed on the site remains in the City forever. Mr. Roberts stated Vantage Companies would construct a quality project and felt they have proven themselves with the other construction in this area. Councilman Schneider stated the Council was very specific when Vantage Companies began construction and there was a lot of negotiation on the exterior finish of the Wholesale Club. He stated he would not favor the Texaco proposal for this parcel. Mr. Roberts stated McDonald's is going to relocate and they are looking at this parcel or another one in Fridley. He stated if the Council prefers a McDonald's on this site, Vantage Companies FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27. 1989 PAGE 7 would not lose any money because they would sell to McDonald's. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated the Council's concern is broader than Vantage's property. He stated to allow a gas station contradicts other efforts being undertaken to make improvements to University Avenue. Councilman Billings felt, at this point, he did not wish to propose an amendment to the development agreement. MOTION by Councilman Billings to table indefinitely. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. CONSIDERATION OF SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A VACATION. SAV #89-01, BY WBDH REALTY. NORTHTOWN NISSAN, FOR MARCH 20, 1989: MOTION by Councilman Billings to set the public hearing for March 20, 1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 27-1989 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-2: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 27-1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 28-1989 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-2. ADDENDUM NO. 1: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 28-1989. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 29-1989 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-1 AND ST. 1989-2: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 29-1989. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. RESOLUTION NO. 30-1989 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LOAN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATL OF MINNESOTA FOR PORTABLE BREATH TESTING INSTRUMENTS: Mr. Jim Hill, Public Safety Director, stated this resolution would authorize the execution of a loan agreement with the State for _____ _ FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27. 1989 PAGE 8 portable breath testing instruments. He stated it is, basically, a housekeeping item with the last resolution on the same subject passed on February 27, 1984. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 30-1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. CONSIDERATION OF A CLEAN INDOOR AIR (NO SMOKING) POLICY FOR THE RENOVATED MUNICIPAL CENTER: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated if this proposal is approved by the Council, it would create a"no smoking" environment at the City Hall, with the exception of the apparatus floor in the Fire Department where smoking would be permitted. He stated this proposal was reviewed with Department Heads at a staff ineeting. He stated there also was discussion by Department Heads with their employees. He stated he understands this is not acceptable to all, but by the vast majority of employees. He stated the "no smoking" policy would not apply to other City buildings such as the garage, nature center, or satellite fire station. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the City was looking at a program for smoking cessation. Mr. Burns stated this has been discussed and could be incorporated into the "no smoking" proposal. Mr. Hill, Public Safety Director, stated he believed most of the health maintenance programs provide funding for smoking cessation. He stated the Council may wish to consider special programs such as hypnosis which is not provided by the health maintenance providers. Councilwoman Jorgenson felt if most health insurance carriers provide this coverage, this would probably be acceptable. Mr. Hill stated he has advised his employees to be prepared for a smoke-free building in conjunction with the renovation of the Civic Center. He stated he would not be opposed to some special program provided by the City. Mayor Nee felt the Council would support such a program. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to establish a clean indoor air (no smoking) policy for the renovated Municipal Center, with the exception of the Fire Department's apparatus room and, further, to offer to employees a program for smoking cessation. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, May�r Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989 PAGE 9 15. APPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the following appointment by the City Manager: STARTING STARTING NAME POSITION SALARY DATE REPLACES Sherree' Smith Secretary in the $18,864.96 March 6, Evelyn Fire Department per year 1989 Loomis (non-exempt) Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously 16. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize payment of Claims No. 24949 through 25144. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 17. LICENSES• MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor � Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 18. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted: Civic Center Remodeling Through January 31, 1989. . . . . . . . . . .$560,390.57 Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc. 151 72nd Ave. So. St. Cloud, MN 56301 Repair & Maintenance of Wells 6, 8, & 11 - Project #186 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2, 985. 00 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19A. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 FOR THE MUNICIPAL CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT: FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 27, 1989 PAGE 10 Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this change order covers proposal requests No. 51 and 53 to add restrooms to the employee lunch area for an estimated cost of $25,000 and relocate the Fire Department air compressor from the lunch area for an estimated cost of $6,000. � MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve Change Order No. 5 for the Municipal Center Renovation Project for an amount not to exceed $31,000. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19B. RESOLUTION NO. 31-1989 TO MAKE TAX FREE PURCHASES OF MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES FOR THE FRIDLEY CIVIC CENTER: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 31-1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS FOR THE POLICE DETENTION FACILITY: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive the bid from Nystrom, Inc., 1701 Madison Street N.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the police detention facility requires special security doors. He stated mailings were sent to three vendors in this business who could supply these doors, but no response was received. Mr. Flora stated Nystrom, Inc, was contacted and the City's Project Manager was , able to obtain a bid to supply the necessary doors, hardware, and gun lockers at a cost of $13,609. Mr. Flora stated this amount is within the authorization limits of regular bids and it would be appropriate to award the contract for metal doors, hardware, and gun lockers to Nystrom. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to award the contract for the hollow metal doors, hardware, and gun lockers for the police detention center to Nystrom, Inc., for a total of $13,609. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of February 27, 1989 adjourned at 8:39 p.m. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL ME TING OF FEBRUARY 27 1989 PAGE 11 Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: � - � � < , i �� - i i THE MII�IIITEB 08' TH8 FRIDLSY CITY COtJ�iCII+ �i$$ MARCB 6, 1989 �� : �� . ,� �� ; . ,.. ,. ' , : ; , �� s� !�� O+R s ., � ; ..� � ,,.J: �.� � � �> � � � �q � '" �, ;?:k = ' :�. ` �+ . l 's I ,W : A J � � ,� r � � � � �� , '�`' '�� r��3. '< �^ , �' �= _ �� , r. � I t 3' �, �- s � �{ ` � 4"�`�t .- 9 � . I ��F`�r��`r�` � :y �� i � . . I - ��*{ K� . I p�i {, y� I � + 3 A 1 I �� r� ✓. d � f II .� • ca II 1 `� � � � � � � � � � �... �..: . „ ,�•�•a ' ��1' '� b`7 I r I I ,2 � . Ir� � �� I _ �� . . ',,, . ',:� i ?� i k- � � .. . . � t.. . . . .. . . �� . 1. "� . THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF MARCH 6, 1989 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:38 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billings MEMBERS ABSENT: None PRESENTATION OF AWARDS OR PROCLAMATIONS: VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK - MARCH 5-12, 1989 GIRL SCOUT WEEK - MARCH 12-18, 1989 Mayor Nee stated he has issued two proclamations, one proclaiming the week of March 5 through 12 as Volunteers of America Week and the other proclaiming the week of March 12 through 18 as Girl Scout Week. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: There was no response from the audience under this item of business. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4.06 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:40 p.m. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 6. 1989 PAGE 2 Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated this is, basically, a housekeeping item submitted by the Charter Commission. He stated in 1985, there was a problem with the City Charter, as it was in conflict with State laws regarding the time for filing nomination petitions. He stated this same thing occurred in 1988 and the Charter Commission felt it would be better to change the language in the Charter to be less specific and the time for filing for nomination petitions should be governed by State law. Mr. Hunt stated the language now in the Charter states that nomination petitions are to be filed "not more than one hundred thirty (130) days nor less than one hundred (100) days before the general election." He stated the Charter Commission is recommending that this terminology be changed to read that "All nomination petitions shall be filed with the City Clerk in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes." Mr. Hunt stated the opinion of the City Attorney is that the State statutes should be followed. He stated it is felt this language would bring the Charter into conformance with State statutes and if changes are again made by the State Legislature, it would not be necessary to have another Charter amendment. No persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed amendment. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 7:44 p.m. NEW BUSINESS: 2. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT, P.S. #88-03, GLACIER PARK COMPANY ADDITION BEING A REPLAT OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 3, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 79. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5110 MAIN STREET N.E., BY API SUPPLY COMPANY: Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated the public hearing on this plat was held on February 27, and it is recommended the Council approve the final plat with the stipulations recommended by the Planning Commission. He stated a resolution for final plat approval will not be submitted until the mylars are reviewed. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve final plat, P.S. #88- 03, with the following stipulations: (1) park fee for Lot 2 shall be paid at the time a building permit is issued; and (2) a bikeway/walkway easement shall be dedicated to the City and recorded by August 15, 1989. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 6 1989 PAGE 3 3. CONSIDERATION OF DEEDING OF LAND TO THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated a letter to the City Manager from David Newman dated February 28, 1989, addresses a problem that has arisen as a result of the pending sale of the Fridley Plaza Office Building adjacent to the City Hall. He stated the Housing and Redevelopment Authority has entered into a new lease agreement with the owners of the office building and part of that lease agreement is that the owners of the building will have a non- exclusive right to use the parking ramp that is being constructed. He stated the problem is that it has been found the Housing and Redevelopment Authority only owns the eastern portion of this parking facility and the balance is owned by the City. Mr. Herrick stated the title company for the new owners of the office building have raised an objection and stated the Housing and Redevelopment Authority cannot enter into that agreement because they do not own all the parking ramp and some is owned by the City. He stated the Housing and Redevelopment Authority cannot lease property to which it is not the owner and the, Housing and Redevelopment Authority is constructing a parking structure on property which it does not technically own. Mr. Herrick stated there are several possibilities to correct this situation and one would be to have the City deed that portion of Lot 7 that lies to the east of Lot 8 to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. He stated this would reserve to the City non-exclusive access for parking, ingress, and egress. Mr. Herrick stated other alternatives would be for both the City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority to enter into a lease agreement with the owners of Fridley Plaza Office Building or the City lease the property to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the HRA would then be permitted to enter into a sublease with the owners of the office building. Councilman Schneider raised the question if a portion of Lot 7 was deeded to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, if part of the Civic Center would then be on HRA property. Mr. Herrick stated this fact has not been considered, but if this is the case, the portion where the Civic Center is located should not be deeded to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Councilman Billings stated he would be willing to support the concept of deeding to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority that portion of Lot 7 that is easterly of the City Hall and retain access over the northerly portion for access to the building. MOTION by Councilman Billings to deed a portion of Lot 7 to the FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 6. 1989 PAGE 4 Housing and Redevelopment Authority subject to ingress and egress easements. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Mr. Herrick stated the assumption all along was the Housing and Redevelopment Authority owned the parking ramp and they would reserve to the City a non-exclusive right to use the parking ramp. He stated this same right applies also to the owners of the Fridley Plaza Office Building and the public. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4. APPOIPLTMENTS: CITY EMPLOYEES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the following appointments by the City Manager: STARTING STARTING NAME POSITION SALARY ATE REPLACES Connie Kampa Crime Prev. Spec. II $21,144.00 March 6 Martha Police Dept. per year 1989 McDonnel (exempt) ($1,762/mo.) Todd Mitchell Patrol Officer $22,296.00 March 14 Arthur Police Dept. per year 1989 Groinus (partial exempt) ($1,858/mo.) Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claims No. 25145 through 25271. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. LICENSES: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the estimates as submitted: FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 6. 1989 PAGE 5 Herrick & Newman, P.A. 6401 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 For Services Rendered as City Attorney For the Month of February, 1989. . . . . . . . . $ 5,431.90 Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of March 6, 1989, adjourned at 8:01 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: � � � � .�: �, ', M `� , I ,z �� _ ,�.. �� . � ��; _ � � � j� �.� � l L �' 3,! e ��a� . . , ' r _ .. ,,� as. , �� . , . - . . '; � � '.. � � �� d ,� � �_�� . . � f �'. .!�. h � '. . . . . . v � � � � ,e� 3:-. , . � . . " - � b '�� -rE ''�E� ��y y� . . . . . . . _ � ��5� � . . . ' : .� :3. �: . . ' : . " � .. + � � y._ �: 1 � �� n �:: - � .. . - � .. . '� x Z�,.. �' � �.2! � •`�Z K ''f ;a�' �e.^'�{, � d rk i �2y�" s : � � ��. �� . , y � s�� r , r, �`'dt° [ . . . .. . , '� `_ 'Z 6 . �. �.' .y '�I j • • . �.. . n` . � � � � a,� :�' t .�r< � � � � �� <` � �� , �_ � fi ;� � Y - ,� , � � �'s.� i . . . . � , �� ` J� t # � b� �� { X� A . � ,. , f«4 ._Y/�,e+ �;; � � . I .� �Ydri!^`` ; � �� ; €� - S � � �_ � �� ; � � �� r �� _ . � . I. „� 7 � t� i dc � d .. � „� � . ;.'�` sr� � �.. , � � � _ ,' I k �.. . � . � 3�- h �� ' � � � .i `�� fer f � ; �� - . . . , . . II �d� � ��Y �„ .F E'Y�, s �� *� k � �� ;-�.�x��: r , �< � � � �� ti�: �. � � ; i �,. r� _�—.� Y .. . .. ... . . II £ F �� b � . - � . - . , , � e °t` � .a . .. .. ' . � � i Y � °�:.. f ^;�4- � 4 ! a�' _ ; 3 ._ ' . - � I r . �'��-�� _ 4, r � �C 'r . .. . ., _ . . . . ^� � � , =� �'��. � � �� ` � �ys �:� ��=::'' - � ,. � �� ;� � , �_. > � �' � ; �- � � � �� '� �� } �� ; J ' R �� 1� � �� ; ,.,�� ,� � �e � ,� �� -� �" , . . . . � . . 4�', � . . . . . . . . t � � .. � . . . ��. . . .. e � . . . . �. - . � .. . - . � . = y. . . .. � � .. . . � . i . . _. . . .. � � . . ,.� _ . . _ . - „ �:-. . . . , , . - ,. � . .. . . . ._ , ;�. � ,..� . '. . . . . . � , ... . . . . -s`r ,`� . .' -� � � _ � # ,�,,;_ . .. ; . . . �'_ ,� . . : �� . . " .i ,� % '. , . :,. � , _ , e� � ,FS � � � , � . �-- . ' . _ . . ;s�.� ,: _s.:z. . . . , . ,,. .. ', . , ....},' . . .; . . . . .: r�, . :, , .- . . � � . . ' . � � � . . .. . ,H . : . .. . � . . � � � x� - � � . . . � � . .. �f' . . . . . � - �'{ _ . � � , . � - "�, - . . , . . .. . . .. . � . . :- � . . � . �� .. � � 'a _. . � � � . . . . � . . . .�, ; ... . .. . _ . , ; .. . . .. . . . .. � � . a_ . . .. . .. � . � � . ,�_y_ � . . . . , . . . . . - . ` ,,tiry . .. , • FAIR HOUSING MONTH APRIL,1989 VYilliam J. Nee Mayor Fridley. MN WH�REAS, tw�nty-one yturs qgo in Ti�le VIII ojth� Civil RightsAct of 1968, the FairHousing Law, Congr�ss dtclartd a mtiona! policy of providing jair housing tl�roagltout thc Urtittd Statts, and WHEREAS, this !aw muk�s dispimfnation Iws�d on ract. sex. color, religion, or nationul erigin i[1egal in connection with the sa/e or rental of housing, and WHEREAS, chc ANOKA COUMY BOARD OF REALTORS is a signatory to the Volw�tary A�'irmativt Markeeing Agrtem�nt. a contract with tht Dtpartmtnt ojHousing end Urbon Developm�nt. �o implemtnt rtlt VJII oj�he Civi! Riglets Act of 19i68, and � WHEREAS, the Anokn County Communiry Housing Resource Board was established to assist tiu ANOKA COUMY BOARD OF REALTORS in unpl�menting the Volun�ary A,Qirmativt Markttin,g Agretm�nt. and WHEREAS, the ANOKA COUMYBOARD OFREALTORS and the ANOKA COUMY COMMUNITYHOUS- ING RESOURCE BOARD art commilt�d to a joinl tfjor! to prtti•ent discriminating housing practic�s in tiie City ojFridley, and W HEREAS, tht AIVQKA COUMY COMMUNIlI'HOUSING RFSOURCE BOARD and the ANOKA COUNTY BOARD OF REALTORS are �oining jeUow Ruouree Boards and REALTORS nationwide in this year's obs�rvonce ca!!ed Fair Houring Month: NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED, tl�at 1. William J. Na. May� of tht Ciry of Fridley, hue6y Proclaini April.1989. ar " FAIR HOUSING MONTH � J�g° "'yf��O1' �t�Z�r�s' toJei�r wtth theANOKA COUN7Y COMMUNITYHOilSING RESOURCEBOARD and the ANOKA COUNTY BOARD OF REALTORS in t/�is obsavonce by w�Eing an octive prrrt in programs sporttored by llust two orgonitattons, w/w this month and t/�roughout tht ytor. are wking aie octivero/e in lulpi�g rnake Fridlty a belttr ploct to livt and work IN W ITNF.SS W H EREOF. I Jiave st� my lia�d m�d rnused the seat ojthe Ciry ojFridley to bt o,0''urtd tlus 20tb day ojMarch.l g�39, , WILLiAM J. NEE, MAYOR ( � . . . . � - , .. - . .. '. ��:; F� � . � . '�'.. -. ¢� . . . . .. d,' . . � . , . .. 1 . . . . i . � . � � . .. �i, , �Y�� ,� . . . . . . . � �� . _ . � . ' . i ',�'y' ` _ �I � I < . . � II � � C'. J$_ a � � k �� ; ,� ` 4 ' j �� K �' � _ �� :f � x� ,:,� - �.� �, , , ,, � � yfi - � �:� ;�> �- :� � �, -� :", � -.�,� � ��& , � �� . � �. �� t ��- ��° ��:� - r. -;,- _ -�_ ' � ' � �_ .�� :x . , "' �Y -,�„�.X ' .. � � � . � � , �`.� Ey�� y� . �db. x��. � r . . .. . �•�f'.. . �� S — g�b :.-:�E� . � � . . . � . . � rifi � �: . . � A',�-�' :Y 'p + � z. . . � � '� x�;�{' � . . . � . . . .. �� *' �? . . . . _. . .� . . . `,«b= � . � . .. . . . . . J ' Ya Y,,,a: I � I i i � ��' �' f n ¢_ t.- _ � � � ; T s � �` �' x � - � � � � � . �# � . � � � � � 4�� t. � . � � � � � n�;��3 . .. .. - � _ � � Y� � - . � � �Y ��'��#� 4�'`,0` '; ��'-5 �,�'°`�{ - , . � . ,�lv �� .' ' ��,�'. � �.d.✓r� �'` d.✓ �� ,� . . � .. . � . . � . ;7;� . . � �.,� � .: , � . �. � � . " . . ��,,. . . .. � . �.. � . .. � , �_ � �" � � .. �.° . . .. , .. . �, ;�"4.s . �. � .. . - ..:� � .. . . ^�,'' x� "� "''h ; � ;� �5..._ � � ..✓�"; � �-u` �� : II F' �� _. . � � . . .w . _ �.. I ..s ��i.`YF,9 � ,. � —� ,�. �„ � ... .� � � : , . ` � .,� , : �. � .�_;µ_ >:._ � . . . ?'` � .� :'. � � ? . . .. � . .-?`� .aii5 ,..... �,:�.. . .. ..� ,' . � ..� � ,. 1, „ - , � . ... r � ,_ ::. � � � . . � .. � - �� , . . � .. , , . . . ; �_ . .._ :>, . . . . , . . , $-,- . , . " �,- �, ,, . .. . �. ; . : � : o � -. �.� , �� -� y,<< :� ':a $t , j; :& . � . . . . . . . � �. � :�' �ik , . � . � t,r:. � �:t . . � - . . � . � . ,-� ; � .�i< �::.1 . . �� . . #'. . - ^: - ... �: �.. i, b' ;�� ,., . yEy. . ' , � ,, , �.�5� a `;;�;, � �, � � µ ;�a � ��' ;i , -�: r. �� f � �'i J.� � �, � . y , , ` "z.� � ; h.;: � +t f• r a'. ..' �1�':;�. d g � � > �"�: F� � � I _ A � � � c��roF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: C01NiMUNITY DEVEL(�PMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDLiM March 15, 1989 1� William Burns, City Manager ��` Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Public Hearing on Vacation Request, SAV #89- 01, WBDH Realty Co. Attached is the staff report for the vacation request to vacate � 30 foot street easement along the eastern property line of the Northtown Nissan property. The vacation request was a condition of approval of the special use permit approved by the Council in 1988. After closing the public hearing, the City Council should direct staff to prepare the ordinance vacating the street easement for first reading. BD/dn M-89-132 � � C1TY OF fRIDLEY REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES 8� ZONWG UliJT�S PARK DEDICATION STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE PLAN�YNG COMIWSSION DATE Febnlary 22, 19s9 C� ��dL DA� February 27_,_ _} 989 ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPUCATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPAT161UTY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEI�ATlON APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMtSSION RECOMMENDATION SAV #89-01 WBLEI Rea1tY �IP�Y Zb vacate a 30 ft. street easement qUTHpq SR / 1 a Alcng the east property lir�e of Iat 3, Block 2, East Randz Estates, Seoarid Additiai, e�ept �he east 200 feet thereof generally located southwest of 7810 University Avenue N.E. Zbtal site: 5.0 acres. E�ansi� area: 1.0 acres N/A C-3, General Shopping N: C-3; S: C-3; E: Spring Lake Park, C-3, Offioe, Comreri cial, and I. 5, Multiple D�llings; W: N�2, Heavy Industrial �1/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Approval with stipulations 1A I 1 �� Staff Report WBDH, SAV #89-01 Page 2 REQUEST The Petitioner, WBDH Realty Company, is requesting the vacation of a 30 foot street easement located along the east property line of Lot 3, Block 2, East Ranch Estates, Second Addition, generally located southwest of 7810 University Avenue N.E. This vacation request was one of seven stipulations attached to SP #88-13 which was approved by Council on October 3, 1988. BACKGROUND SP #88-13 was issued to allow Northtown Nissan to expand its outdoor storage on a one-acre parcel to the south of 7810 University Avenue N.E. This site was affected by a lot split, L.S. #75-10, which required a street and utility easement along the east lot line of the property as well as the property to the east. The City vacated part of this easement in 1987 (SAV #87-04) in connection with the ABRA development (parcel to the east), but retained a 30 foot street and utility easement for the site on which Northtown Nissan later sought expansion. ANALYSIS During the October 3, 1988, City Council meeting at which the special use permit was approved, concern was raised regarding future access problems if the property were to be sold. The possibility of those lots to the west becoming "landlocked" was discussed at that time. City Attorney, Virgil Herrick, explained that this problem could be avoided if the property in question were to be combined into one tax parcel. This would require that a lot split be approved if Nissan wished to sell the property at a future date, and the question of accessibility could be addressed at that time. Because the combination has not yet been executed, it is recommended that the combination be a stipulation of approval. It is also recommended that the utility easement be retained and a drainage easement be obtained for the same location. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested vacation, SAV #89-01, to vacate the 30 foot easement for street purposes with the following stipulations: 1. The parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel prior to final adoption of the ordinance authorizing the vacation. 2. The easement for utility purposes shall be retained as currently described. Staff Report WBDH, SAV #89-01 Page 3 1C 3. The petitioner shall execute a 30 foot drainage easement to the City for the same location�. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the vacation request with the three stipulations presented by staff. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION State statutes require that the City Council conduct a public hearing for a vacation request. After closing the public hearing, it is recommended that the City Council direct staff to prepare an ordinance for first reading to vacate the street easement. 1D PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the City Council of the City of Fridley at the COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, 6085 -?TH 5TREET N.E. on Monday, March 20, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Vacation, SAV #89-01, by WBDH Realty Company, to vacate a 30 foot road easement located along the east property line of Lot 3, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, except the east 200 feet thereof, generally located southwest of 7810 University Avenue N.E. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the at the above stated time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: March 1, 1989 March 8, 1989 Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. SAV ��89-01 WBDH Realty Co. 1 E -� _ � �_ _ � -- -- � . - . � „ �� - -�- �. ` i � ' �r • . i n � :i .Oti •.a► � � �� : '� / � • 6 `�, � ] 1 � _ �// � 7 �,�� y. '. h � � � (Z;) � � S ; t :,� � ,.iis,erjrr.r ' .� ��O �/ � �,'• �' � p ' ; C 7 � -�k.... ...� ' _ � j�� t`� � � � . ci �" � Z s �� v> `� � � � � �: 6 �� ,s , � ,. • .t�.. �� A./�lwc.u.rs 1 � ,�il. N' "�� 'S � ! s'�s.'4 � 7110 . I ' � '- � � -fi�y� -- 31 .., � �vt f� � , � �wr.�s � �� G. � f�/drd�,R1� ;, w _ �c �s •wr'�v� ' 'ti >> . � . .. 1 � i. .... � � _� '•� :a � ,; .._ 1r"� � �. ,�4'ft d • ' ,S,��m - ' / � s,� � 8�0 �,_� � ,.1r ��'� �eae � � a� ��. 7546 7820' s' �1�� / (r) i �, 8 � 7 87�;) � � / �i - � � �� , i , .a.�.w�.,N.w�, • � � � , � c«�.r .� ; . Mr ntAe � a . . A' �JC A✓ .k /!'nlv . � '� � 1 � � 83r _ H : 3 N � . � ��z �� o 1 �� 1 �f� � 7 $ �3) _... ps __ I i �/�) � � O 7 810 � '� 7 e ss ''� � � �� Q O �� ...d • 5 , �r. , y , � -Prevf'ou � at � i �E � , '` i� ' � G�� 2 j a. G %� � 773� s , ��3 � ( �(` 7�9 l , � P,� � t � i� � � N. . ' _ . ..... . 1 �n� iNi y e� � �`. 77f o � 770� -7103 . I +�` I�� .� �J(!) � � 77 D 2 7 7 8'-S � I� .� s'C'"� � . � (7) I��'- .�"' .. ,� ;; � ..., 7703 7700 . ih � � cn� (�) u. � ,� f.s.r . �'�, !, :. ' I. � � � I e wr,.�s.e,r. �.t 8s , /¢ I . ,,. _ nn- «. _ • � _.. --- , . _ .�...�. r.►� _ , _ __ . _�_... L4CATION MAP CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COM�ISSION KEETINa, FBBRIIARY 22, 1989 ---------------------------------------•------------------------- CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Betzold called the February 22, 1989, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Donald Betzold, Sue Sherek, Alex Barna, Paul Dahlberg Members Absent: Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba • Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coor�inator Steven Barg, Planning Assistant APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 1 1989 SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES• MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to approve the February 1, 1989, Special Planning Commission minutes as written. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 8 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Barna, to approve the February 8, 1989, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 1. CONSIDERATZON OF A VACATION SAV #89-01 BY WBDH REALTY COMPANY:� To vacate a 30 foot road easement located along the east property line of Lot 3, Block 2, East Ranch Estates, Second Addition, except the east 200 feet thereof, generally located southwest of 7810 University Avenue N.E. Ms. Dacy introduced Steven Barg. She stated Mr. Barg is helping out until they have a replacement for Kathlyn Castle. -1- 1G 1H pLANNING COMMISSION 1�EETINa, FEBRUARY 22. 1989 Mr. Barg stated WBDH Realty Company is requesting a vacation of a 30 foot street easement at the above location. This vacation request is one of seven stipulations attached to a special use permit, SP �88-13, which was approved by the City Council on October 3, 1988, to allow Northtown Nissan to expand its outdoor storage on a one acre parcel to the south of 7810 University Avenue N.E. This site was affected by a lot split (L.S. #75-10) which required a street and utility easement along the east lot line of the property as well as the property to the east. The City vacated part of this easement in 1987 (SAV �8�-04) in connection with the ABRA development but retained a 30 foot street and utility easement for the site on which Northtown Nissan later sought expansion. Mr. Barg stated that when the special use permit was approved on October 3, 1988, the City Council raised some concern regarding future access problems if the property were to be sold, and the possibility of the lots to the west becoming "landlocked" was discussed. After a consultation with the City Attorney, Virgil Herrick, Mr. Herrick felt this problem could be avoided if the property in question is to be combined into one tax parcel. If Nissan wished to sell the property at a future date, it would require a lot split, and the question of accessibility could be addressed at that time. Mr. Barg stated staff is recommending approval of the vacation with the following three stipu2ations: 1. 2. The parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel prior to final adoption of the ordinance authorizing the vacation. The easement for utility purposes shall be retained as currently described. 3. The petitioner shall execute a 30 foot drainage easement to the City for the same location. Mr. Betzold asked if the City is locking itself into one particular mode of development for this area by vacating the street and, therefore, landlocking the lots to the west. Ms. Sherek stated she feels this is a moot point now anyway. The City has already vacated the easement on the ABRA development, so the property is already landlocked. Mr. Barna stated not only was the easement vacated at ABRA, but there was also a vacation just north of Bob's Produce, so the lot is already effectively landlocked. Any future development would -2 - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBROARY 22, 1989 have to go east to the West Service Drive. Mr. Dahlberg stated he did not understand why there is a need to have that drainage easement in that location. That is the high point of the property. On the east, water drains to the frontage road and on the west, the water drains to the low area on the west. There would be no possibility that any drainage would even occur in the proposed area. Was there any possibility of incorporating a drainage easement alonq the west edge of the property? Ms. Dacy stated there is already a drainage easement along the west edge of the property. She stated John Flora, Public Works Director, wanted to reserve the drainage easement in this location. She stated Mr. Dahlberg is right, the water does drain to the east and to the west. Ms. Sherek stated she agreed with Mr. Dahlberg. There should be a drainage area on the property, but not in the proposed location. Mr. Dahlberg stated no one can build on a utility easement anyway; and as long as the drainage easement is in the same area as the utility easement, he really had no objection as long as the petitioner had no objection. Ms. Dacy stated staff would verify this with the petitioner. MoTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Harna, to recommend to City Council approval of vacation, SAV #89-01, by WBDH Realty Company to vacate a 30 foot road easement located along the east property line of Lot 3, Block 2, East Ranch Estates, Second Addition, except the east 200 feet thereof, generally located southwest of 7810 University Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The parcels shall be combined into one tax parcel prior to final adoption of the ordinance authorizing the vacation. 2. The easement for utility purposes shall be retained as currently described. 3. The petitioner shall execute a 30 foot drainage easement to the City for the same location. OPON A VOICB VOTE, l�LL VOTINQ AYE, CBPiIRPERBON BETZOLD DECLARED T$E MOTION CARRIED ITNANZMOIISLY. 2. LIGHT RAIL TRANSZT UPDATE: -3- 11 � � ci�nroF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: C0111[MUNIT�Y DEVELOPMENT DEPART'MENT' MEMORANDUM March 15, 1989 g• �r William Burns, City Manager �'�� Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator Consideration of a Special Use Permit, Community Development Corporation Attached is the staff report for the special use penait request by Community Development Corporation, to construct 70 units of elderly housing on the property adjacent to St. William's church. The City Council tabled action on February 13, 1989 until further study could be done regarding the building's exterior construction materials. Included in the attached report is a response from Community Development Corporation regarding the exterior facade as well as the staff analysis of the applicant's information. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the special use permit request as presented, subject to the recommended stipulations by the Planninq Commission and subject to second and final reading of the ordinance rezoning the property. BD/dn M-89-130 � P �► STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE x/A ��QF PLANWNG COMMI$$ION DATE xovember 9, 1988 FRiDLEY CRY COUN(�L DATE : Februar �3, 1989 AurFiOq BD/dn � Mar� � REQUEST ; PERMIT NUMBER ; APPLICANT � PROPOSED REQUEST , LOCATION SiTE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES �i Z�Q� UME$ PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHEIVSNE PLAN COMPA'T�ILITY WtTH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS � STAFF RECOMMENDATION � APPEALS RECOMMENDATION I PLANNWG COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION SP ��88-15 Community Development Corporation for the Archdiocese of Minneapolis and St. Paul Rezoning request from R-2 and C-3 to R-3 Northwest corner of Sth Street and 61st Avenue, north of St. William's church. 2.79 acres N/A R-2 and C-3 North, R-2 (duplexes); South, C-3 (church); East, R-1 (single family); West, C-3 (strip center). Municipal services available. $750.00 for residential lot split. IiRA assistance may be requested. Yes. Yes. Site is depressed below street elevation, used as a ballfield. Approval. N/A currently 2A 2B Staff Report Community Development Corporation SP #88-15 Page 2 REQUE5T In evaluating a special use permit request, the zoning ordinance states that the "City may consider the nature of the land upon which the use is to be located, the nature of the adjoining land or buildings, the effect upon traffic into and from the premises on any adjoining roads, and all such other factors as the City shall reasonably deem a requisite of consideration in determining the effect of such use". The applicant is requesting approval of a special use permit to construct a 70 unit apartment building to be known as Norwood Square. The applicant indicates that of the 70 apartment units, 50 will be one bedroom and 20 will be two bedroom units. Common areas will be provided, including laundry rooms, storage closets, a lobby, a dining/multi-purpose room, and a workshop and lounge. ANALYSIS Lot Area The R-3 district requires 2,500 square feet per dwelling unit of lot area for multiple family complexes. However, the ordinance allows for a 300 square foot lot area reduction for every underground parking stall. The applicant is proposing to install 53 underground car stalls, which translates into a lot area reduction of 15,900 square feet. For 70 units, 175,000 square feet is required. After subtracting the underground car stall credit, approximately 37,600 square feet is necessary to meet the lot area requirements of the R-3 district. In order to make up the difference, it was agreed with the applicant that a permanent easement be executed along the northerly 85 feet of the St. William's church property. The intent of the easement is to maintain the area as open space and eliminate the potential of additional building within the easement ar�a. The easement area would also include a portion of the existing parking area for the church. As is noted under the grading and drainage section of this report, the easement area is a potential site for a storm water management pond. The easement document should be drafted to prevent building on the easement but to allow the creation of a storm water pond. Parking The applicant has indicated a"proof of parking area" containing 39 spaces in the event the building converts from elderly housing to apartments available to the general public. This additional area will not be constructed as it is anticipated that only 78 spaces are necessary to serve the residents and staff. 2C Staff Report Community Development Corporation SP #88-15 Page 3 Three driveway entrances are proposed onto 5th Street N.E. The parking area immediately in front of the proposed building will be primarily intended for visitor parking: The parking area on the north side of the building is intended for resident parking and access to the parking garage. The traffic generation from an elderly housing development is substantially less than that which is generated from a typical apartment project. The Institute of Traffic Engineers estimates traffic generation of approximately five trips per dwelling unit in a standard apartment complex. Given that the proposed project is for the elderly only, the traffic generation is substantially less given that no more than two persons will occupy a unit. All surface parking areas must be lined with concrete curbing and all parking spaces must be striped. Setbacks and Building Requirements The proposed site plan meets or exceeds the required setbacks and building requirements in the R-3 district. The proposed building height facing 5th Street N.E. is approximately 36 feet, below the maximum height restriction of 65 feet. The building is designed in the shape of an "H". The intent of this design is to imitate the width of the existing lots across 5th Street and to vary the mass of the building so that it is not overwhelming. This design also helps to keep the scale and character of the project compatible with the existing uses. The proposed building materials consist of split face masonry and rock face block with horizontal wood siding between the second and third floors. The roof design imitates the roof design of the existing homes in the neighborhood. The proposed colors are gray, tan and charcoal gray. The building will have a full time on-site manager and will have a security entrance. Each unit will have an emergency pull cord in the bathroom and bedroom for the management company to call necessary medical services if necessary. The dwelling unit sizes exceed the requirements of the R-3 district. A one bedroom will be approximately 600 square feet and a two bedroom will be approximately 1,000 square feet. Landscaping Staff inet with the applicant on November 1, 1988 to discuss the landscaping plan. The applicant complied with staff direction and submitted a revised landscaping plan prior to distribution of the staff reports. The following comments are based on the revised landscape plan. While the revisions incorporate a majority of staff's comments, the following should be included in the final Staff Report Community Development Corporation SP #$$-15 Page 4 m landscape plan to be submitted at the time of building permit application: 1. Japanese Greenleaf Barberry Hedge along the front parking area shall be installed and maintained at a height of 3-4 feet and spaced at 1 1/2 - 2 feet. 2. Al1 trees shall be balled and burlapped. No tree spaded evergreens will be permitted. 3. Street trees shall have a 2 1/2 inch caliper. The Cranberry trees shall have a 1 3/4 inch - 2 inch caliper and the shrubs shall have a 2 foot or 5 gallon pot. 4. In order to accomplish consistent screening along the rear lot line in compliance with Section 205.09.07.8, the applicant shall install one of the three combinations of fencing and landscaping: a. Install an eight foot privacy fence with five Silver Maples b. Install a Continuous Spruce Evergreen planting of ten foot trees at 10-15 foot spacing. c. Install and maintain a hedge at minimum 6-8 feet of Techny Arborvitae, Upright Juniper or Amur Maple spaced at 1 1/2 - 2 feet. 5. An underground lawn sprinkling system shall be provided to maintain the lawn and landscaping areas. Grading and Drainage The City Engineer has indicated that a storm water management plan will be required at the time of building permit application. Because the property is located below street level, it acts as the receptacle for a majority of the drainage from the neighborhood. The storm water management plan will not only have to accommodate the runoff from the proposed development but any expansion contemplated by St. William's church. There is adequate area on the property to accommodate the ponding necessary to be created. Restrictive Covenants The City Attorney's office has advised that the City can require the applicant to file deed restrictions which restrict the project to housing for the elderly only. The two elderly projects in New Brighton have used the same method as part of their approval process. - __ _ _ Staff Report Community Development Corporation SP #88-15 Page 5 _ 1�4 Mi�-� The proposed site plan meets or exceeds the R-3 district requirements. The proposed building design is sensitive to existing conditions in the neighborhood. As a senior housing building, the proposed location is convenient to shopping, medical office uses, and the senior center. The proposed use will not have an adverse affect on the surrounding land uses. Seven conditions of approval are recommended. RECOMMENDATION Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission�approve Special Use Permit, SP #88-15, based on the site plan received November 3, 1988 and subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall submit a storm water management plan at the time of building permit application. 2. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval for the lot split application. 3. The applicant shall record restrictive covenants dictating that the project is for the elderly only and is not an apartment building to be rented to the general public. The covenants shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's office prior to recording. 4. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted at the time of building permit application, containing the following changes: A. Japanese Greenleaf Barberry Hedge along the front parking area shall be installed and maintained at a height of 3-4 feet and spaced at 1 1/2 - 2 feet. B. All trees shall be balled and burlapped. No tree spaded Evergreens will be permitted. C. Street trees shall have a 2 1/2 inch caliper. The Cranberry trees shall have a 1 3/4 inch - 2 inch caliper and the shrubs shall have a 2 foot or 5 gallon pot. D. In order to accomplish consistent screening along the rear lot line in compliance with Section 205.09.07.B, the applicant shall install one of the three combinations of fencing and landscaping: 1. Install an eight foot privacy fence withffive Silver Maples 2E Staff Report Community Development Corporation SP #8$-15 Page 6 � � 7. 2F 2. Install a Continuous Spruce Evergreen planting of ten foot trees at 10-15 foot spacing. 3. Install and maintain a hedge at minimum 6-8 feet of Techny Arborvitae, Upright Juniper or Amur Maple spaced at 1 1/2 - 2 feet. The applicant shall install an underground lawn sprinkling system to maintain all lawns and landscaping on the property. All parking areas shall be striped and shall be lined with concrete curb. Park dedication fees shall be paid at time of building permit application. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION At the November 9, 1988 meeting, unanimously recommended approval of seven conditions recommended by staff. CITY COUNCIL ACTION the Planning Commission the request subject to the At the February 13, 1989 City Council meeting, the public hearing for the rezoning request was closed, and the special use permit request was tabled in order to study the types of materials proposed for the exterior facade. In response to the City Council's concern, Muffie Gabler from Community Development Corporation, has analyzed the construction and rental cost impacts of using different building materials (see attached letter dated March 9, 1989), specifically brick and wood versus rockface block and aluminum siding. Ms. Gabler states that providing an all brick exterior will increase construction costs, interest and fees by $195,500. This would cause an additional rental cost per unit of $34.00 per month. She also states that an all brick exterior would present too much of an institutional appearance. Another option proposed is to replace the rock face block with brick to the first floor windows. This would increase construction costs by $73,300 and increase rental costs by $13.00 per unit per month. Gabler states that Community Development Corporation will not accept any scenario which includes wood siding because of its high maintenance and construction costs. 2G Staff Report Community Development Corporation SP #88-15 Page 7 CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff maintains its original recommendation to approve the proposed materials, including the rock face block to the first floor, and aluminum siding and stucco. The proposal is an appropriate architectural treatment, given the location oE the building in this particular neighborhood. As the applicant correctly points out, the proposed finishes are predominant with other housing structures in the neighborhood. In order to address the Council's concerns, the applicant has proposed an alternative to use a brick exterior to the first floor windows. While brick has been incorporated into recent multi-family projects such as Springbrook Apartments, the rock face block is an acceptable alternative. - It is recommended that the City Council approve the special use permit, SP #88-15, based on the site plan received November 3, 1988, subject to the seven stipulations recommended by the Planning Commission and second and final approval of the rezoning application, ZOA #88-04. _ _ --�P ��88-15 y opment : _ + � f . o _.._._ . �. .. _ c�� ' � , � « � �+ �� '� W ��. �y a i�1 a = '-�' ��`� 3 � '��`' .�<s�- °''iii : � :�' � � - ;� , . �. :t ' O � �Z �^• �W-+ac2. = ; ( , � _. ., . � e:: `�. � Z N. � :aF-�a�e. n �ii#! � � ; • �,—..� _ _. . . . _.: � W :q, ' •• � s �' � � f'M tw�+ ,i 19 ,� " I� �� '� '� /�/ '� " — � �u� — �� , / � �� il �' � � / �I ', �� .I�— lJ ' • � II .` i �� i : . � . j� � ; � �� 'i ._- . � .. , ' y , ' �` � � q'` _ � �l � � ; .'� � I � � t•' � �� i (t. � �t. , If' ' '.� 1 i�� : � � �'�4 11 � �• li: ► ;�. � . t ?, �;�i..� � � � • ;',i �I••;�� , s ti�� 11;) y , _` •� I Z 11 I 1 � ii� � : � � , � ��• `� 1 f1 Pi' � � ' ��,�y1 i� . � � � . . 11„ � ��'��-1��I�:�.r��1 .' �� '�. / ;�' ' - ��yF;� . �1,•�,• ��, 'V, � . I .:- . i� � . . � i�r� ' ig�; ''��r �� . � - •�, {j, ` , /�4!� � i � .%:�. - ��t \�.��•''L�� . .-r; •i 1 f �` /+ + I 1 � �. ti 1�' �, �, , � ' 1. i � •� ,�' t , . , ' J � ��,�,��p� �� D � � , i � ,i � , , . ]�1� ..�� : . 1 �.. , ._ ~ • . ' � ' < ��, t�:.•] - J � L....�� .: � .� ��•^, � , .. o �.,�{�— W� �� : . ��; , o �x, �,, �' ; • � � o x� � i � � � ��}� �i.: � � W �` �": a i �� « w n � o �� +� � � � � � » � ��,�' �� < - k9 �� I°w� � . i t � � �� _ 3 � 7 .� �1 � 1 .� • �'° ± � –�,. � 'a } . . i �� ! -( � . � -� �---�. � I . II I ( . � l I I I,�_ ; ! • p . ; .' i i . • � .••; � _ - 2H C� Ms. Barbara Dacy Planning Coordinator City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Exterior finish for Norwood Square Dear Barb: 2J WESTMI]YSTER CORPORAT101Y 328 West Sixth Street Saint Paul, �M155102 Phone 612-291-1750 March 9, 1989 This letter is in response to your recent meeting with Dor� Mead of Housing Resources Corporation and John Culligan of Boarman & Associates. As you know, we have proposed that the exterior finish for Norwood Square in- clude rock face block to the first floor windows, with a combination of stucco and aluminum siding above the rock face block. These materials were selected primarily for the following reasons: 1. General appearance -- The proposed materials would give Norwood Square a more residential appearance than an all-brick exterior would. In addition, stucco and siding are the predominant finishes on the other housing in the neighborhood; and we felt it important to design the building to compliment its residential neighbors. By contrast, with an all-brick exterior, Norwood Square would visually relate more to St. William's Church than to the residen- tial neighborhood and would provide Less of a visual "transition" between the Church/commercial areas to the south and west and the residential areas to the north and east; 2. Building mass and impression of height -- By utilizing contrasting materials, horizontal bandings of the building are achieved. Coupled with the use of a hip roof (which is the predominant resi- dential roof in the neighborhood), the horizontal bandings attract the eye to a Lower level of the building, thereby giving Norwood Square the appearance of being shorter than it is. With the proposed materials in mind, we have also endeavored to minimize the mass of the building. The major technique the archi- tect developed to address this challenge is the use of the "H" shape of the structure. This important feature effectively breaks the building up into three distinct sections, which minimizes the overall impression of the scale of the building. A Whollyowned Subsidiary of Community Development Corporation for the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis Ms. Barbara Dacy March 9, 1989 Page 2 If the exterior of the minimizing function of We would have to look brick exterior in mind; building were constructed of all brick, the the "H" shape would be substantially lost. at re-designing the building with an all- 3. Maintenance -- Enclosed is a listing of four differen t scenarios in which the exterior finish of Norwood Square would be changed from the finish that has been proposed: (i) Replacing the aluminum siding with wood siding; (ii) Replacing the rock face block with brick (to the first floor window sills); (iii) Combining scenarios (i) and (ii) [replacing the aluminum siding with wood siding and replacing the rock face block with brick]; and (iv) Providing an all-brick exterior. Because they include wood siding, scenarios (i) and (iii) are not acceptable to the Community Development Corporation. Aside from its higher construction costs, wood siding requires constant attention. It would raise the on-going maintenance costs, would provide an annual inconvenience to residents, and would increase the amount of staff time that must be devoted to non-productive activities. Because they are low-maintenance materials, rock face block, alumi- num siding and brick are all acceptable to us from a management perspective; 4. Development costs and affordability -- We are making every effort to develop Norwood Square on a basis that will make the housing affordable to modest-income seniors. We are striving to achieve rents that start at approximately $500 per month for the smallest (610 square feet) one-bedroom units. Even without a brick exterior, we already know that we will need all the help we can ge t in order to achieve the goal of rents starting at $500 for a 610-square-foot one-bedroom unit. By way of comparison, housing for seniors developed under HUD's Section 202 program is now resulting in rents of approximately $515 for one- bedroom units that include only 540 square feet of living space. Even with those smaller units, 202 housing usually requires muaici- pal assistance in order to make the rents of $515 "work'�. r� `` Ma. Barbara Dacy March 9, 1989 Page 3 We are very concerned that the cost of a brick exterior will make Norwood Square less affordable for the seniors who need it most. Although I personally don't care for their color schemes, I point out that the townhouses across from the City's current offices have aluminum siding. Also, the all-brick five-story building adjacent to the townhouses provides a more institutional appearance than the impression we would like Norwood Square to convey. Barb, I would be happy to discuss these subjects with you in more detail and will plan to attend the March 20th meeting of the City Council. I look forward to seeing you again then. Very truly yours, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAINT PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS ��. � _ . « � �``i;�.-.�r�_�_-� � Mary S. Gabler Director of Development SDM:em Enclosures cc Father John Brandes Mr. Malcolm Mitchell _ 2L NORWOOD SQUARE March 6, 1989 ESTIMATED EFFECT of EXTERIOR FINISHES on AVERAGE UNIT MONTHLY RENT and MINIMUM RESIDENT INCOME REQUIREMENT Starting point (rock face block to lst floor windows; combination of stucco and aluminum siding above) Replace aluminum siding with painted wood siding Replace rock face block with brick (brick to lst floor windows) Replace rock face block with brick and aluminum siding with painted wood siding Provide all-brick exterior Additional Additional Additional unit rent annusl income construction costs, required required of interest and fees per month residents** N/A $ 30,600 73,300 103,900 195,500 N/A $ g* 13 20* 34 * including additional reserves to pay for on-going maintenance ** based on 40% of income paid toward housing expense NfA $ 240 390 .�� 1,020 2M COMMISSION TERMB THAT WILL EBPIRE IN 1989 FOR CITY COIINCIL CONSIDERATION APPOINTEB APPEALS COMMI88ION ENERGY COMMISSION ENVIRONMENTAL 4IIALITY COMMISSION HUMAN RESOIIRCEB COMMISSION TERM E%PIRES CIIRRENT MEMBBR 4-1-89 4-1-89 4-1-89 4-1-90 4-1-91 Diane Savage 567 Rice Creek Terrace (H.571-3862)(B.421-4760 x1270) Dean Saba 6325 Van Buren Street NE (H.571-1953)(B.635-5860) Bruce Bondow 6616 Central Avenue NE (H.571-0163)(B.293-4604) Vacant (Bruce Hanley resigned io-i9-ss) Vacant (Gerald Welf resigned 1i-22-ss) 4-1-89 Paul Dahlberg 6664 East River Road (H.572-9093)(B.545-1253) 4-1-89 Steven A. Stark 6655 Fridley Street NE (H.571-4961)(B.296-7214) 4-1-91 Vacant (Maynard Nielsen's term expired) 4-1-89 Claudia Dodge 840 - 66th Avenue (H.571-8890)(8.422-5199) 4-1-89 Francis van Dan 6342 Baker Avenue NE (H.571-3177) 3 PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 4-1-89 Dick Younq 5695 Quincy Street NE (H.571-8098)(B. 786-5570 x221) 4-1-89 Daniel Allen 6200 Rice Creek Drive NE (H.571-0137)(B.625-6800) FRIDLEY HOIISING AND REDEVELOPMENT AIITHORITY 6-9-89 Larry Commers 5212 St. Moritz Drive NE (H.571-8925)(8.343-1123) CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION POLICE COMMISSION 4-1-89 Duane Peterson 1021 Hathaway Lane NE (H.571-3386)(B.374-1120) 4-1-89 Mavis Hauge 645 67th Avenue NE (H.571-1083) f 3A � �'� MEMO TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS,- Y MANAGER �' FROM: WILLIAM C. HUNT;�/ STANT TO THE CITY MANAGER STAFF PERSON FOR CHARTER CONIlKISSION SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 4.06 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1989 Section 4.06 of the Fridley City Charter sets forth the procedures for nominating a candidate for election to the City Council. Among other things it establishes a window for filing nomination petitions. Currently, these are to be filed "not more than one hundred thirty (130) days nor less than one hundred (100j days before the general election. . . ." In 1988 this was found to be in conflict with state election laws which superceded this provision. A similar conflict occurred in 1984 which led to the amendment of this section in 1985 to bring it into conformity with the state election laws at that time. Since the state election laws do change from time to time, and since these new statutes supercede the Charter when they are in conflict, it seemed best to the Charter Commission to remove the specific requirement of so many days and replace it with more general terminology which would not have to change as the state laws change. The new sentence in Section 4.06 reads as follows: All nomination petitions shall be filed with the City Clerk in accordance Minnesota State Statutes. The Fridley Charter Commission approved this amendment at its meeting of October 24, 1988, and voted to submit it to the Fridley City Council on January 30, 1989. On behalf of the Fridley Charter Commission I request that you present this amending ordinance to the Fridley City Council and request them to set a public hearing on the proposed amendment for the Council meeting to be held on March 6, 1989. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDYNANCE AMENDING SECTION 4.06 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY DOES �RDAIN AS FOLIAWS: SECTION 4.06. NOMINATIONS BY PETITION. The mode of nomination of all elective officers provided for by this Charter shall be by petition. The name of any eligible voter of the City shall be printed upon the ballot whenever a petition as hereinafter prescribed shall have been filed in that person's behalf with the City Clerk. Such petition shall be signed by at least ten (10) registered voters qualified to vote for the office in question. No elector shall sign petitions for more candidates than the number of offices to be filled at the election. Should such a case occur, the signature shall be void as to the petition or petitions last filed. //All nomination petitions shall be in the hands of the City Clerk not more than one hundred thirty (130) days nor less than one hundred (100) days before the general election at which time the filings shall be closed. The City Clerk shall prepare the ballots with names of the candidates for an office in a manner to be provided by ordinance.//All nomination petitions shall be filed with the City Clerk in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes. Each petition, when presented, must be accompanied by a five dollar ($5.00) filing fee. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY �F , 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK Public Hearing: March 6, 1989 First Reading: Second Reading: Publications: 4� .�_ :�4�; �� v 4 �, �t7�a��1� • • :1�• Ms. Hendley asked hvw the Ccmnission m�ers felt aixxit the G drawing this fram the City Co�cil and preparing to put it cn Mr. Stouffer stated the Catmissio� has started a process, cocitinue that process and let the Cwncil make a decisio� 4 'with- 'they should way or the other. Mr. Betzold stated if the Cauicil c3oe.s not wte to appr , for whatev�er reason, then the praposed aac�erx�ment mist go to the wt,ers. I shauld prabably be on the ballot for the Nov�er I989 election. That wo d be a city wide election. It would be folly to txy to call a special electi in April, so they essential.ly have one year. If the nosmal processes are in ace and the Council vr�tes scme time in Januazy 1989, it was his sugges ' to wait ar�d see what the Council does. t1r. van Dan stated he would feel a littl uneasy if they w�ere forcing the issue to a special election, because they trying to increase participation in an electoral process. The Councilme:mbe are elected by the peaple, and the Charter Coim�ission members are not, so they should let the Council prevail first on their vwn timelin�e and the ssioc� can wait and see what happens . MOTION by Mr. Stouffer, by rir, van Dan, to vontinue the process for proposed Charter amerr�nts the City Council, and that the Charter Catmission review this issue on a mee g-to-meetir�g basis. UPON A VOICE VO�I'E, ALL ItJG AYE, Ci�tPF•RSOI�T I�,T�LEY DD�� TF� NK3TION CA.gI;IED (JNANIl�lOUSLY. r •• u x; • �t �� FOR D�IIZS'fIIP IN Tf� C�ER COPT'IISSION: Ms. HPndley sta she had talked to John Sillman who has lived in Fridley since 1979. He is Coordinator for the Fridley Volunteer Service for the seniors and low i.n people. He is r►ow r�tireci and has irrlicated he would be willing to sexv�e Charter Cannission. He will si�txnit a letter �ressing his interest ' sexving. The C ssion meml�ers stated they would wt�e to send Mr. Sillman's name to the J ge after receipt of the letter. iiunt stat�ed he hq�ed to find cut the prooedure, if a�►, for reducing the : of the Chart,er Cannissi� m��bers by tl�e r�ext meeting. 3, CONSIDE:EiATION OF SDCTI�I 4.06 , N(MIl�►TIC�IS BY PETITION: Mr. Hunt stated that at the last meetinq, t�ir. Betzold made a moticn reoartneriding scme language for di.scussion and adopti� by the Charter Caimissian. MC1I'IOr1 by Mr. Staiffer, secoaxied by Mr. Oquist, to reaffirm the nntio� made on S�ptesrber 26, 1988, to reoomrn.,ryd that Section 4.06 of the Fridley City Charter � be a�nended as follaas: Sentenve 6, beginning with "All nanination petitions..." be deleted ar�d replaced with the follaairx3 w�z�ding: "A11 nanination�etitions shall be filed with the Ci Clerk in acoordance wi.th e e ection�aws establi ed by Minnesota State Statutes." 4B 4C CK.AR'I'ER CC)t�'Il�IISSIO!�l ME�,�'�lG, OC."T�OBER 24, 1988 PAGE S Lrr'ON A VOICE VdI'E, ALL VCmING AYE, Cf�1IRPER.SON I�1�IDLEY DDGL�RID Tf� MOTION CA�2RIID �SLY. � Mr. van Dan stated that in loo�cing at the w��iing of the n�tion, he did not like the w�ord� "established", and felt it should be replaced with a m�re apprapriate w�ord. To him, the wc�rd "established" means a basic, first time, nailed ciown fact, and this is not the case. It should be replaced �rith "rg3ulated" or "o�ntained in Minnesota State Statutes". P'x7I'ION by I�ir. Nelson, secanded by Mr. van Dan, t�o reopen discussion ori Co ideration of Section 4.06, Naninations by Petition". UPON A VOICE VC1I'E, ALL VC1rING AYE, Q�AIRPERSON i�DLEY DE)CIAi2ID T� NK7TION CARRI�D tTI�NIlKCXJSLY. MOTION by Mr. Stauffer, seconded by Mr. Betzold, to change the w�rding in the a�ove motian arxi that sentence 5 of Secti� 4.06 of the Fridley City Charte.r be amended as follc�ws: "All ryomination petitions shall be filed with the City Clerk in acoo�3ance with Minnesota State Statutes." L'PON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VCnING AYE, CI-mIRPERSOr1 F�DLEY DDCI,�RID THE MOTION CARR� IJI�1.'JIl�IiCXJSLY. 4. CONSIDg2ATI0N OF SDCTION 4.07, NQt•12I�1TING PETITIONS (FOi�]AT) : Mr. Hunt stated that at the last meeting, tl�e Ca*mission voted to refer the consideration of Sectiosi 4.07 to the City Attorney and the Charter Cacnnission Attorney for drafting the appropriate language to make 5ection 4.07 oonform with State Statutes. He stated this has not yet been done. This iteqn was oontinued until the next meeting. 5. CONSIDg2ATION �' PREPARATION OF �JAL R�ORT IN CQ�LIANCE A'ITfi MINNESOTA STATUTES, 410.05, SU�. 2: Mr. Hunt stated it had axr�e to his attention that the Ca�ussia� has been out of c�pliance with this State Statute requisenent to sut�nit an aru�ual report to the c�ief judge of the district vourt on or before Dec. 31 of each year. MOTIC7�1 by Mr. Stwffer, semnded by Mr. Oquist, t�o subcnit an annual report to the chief judge of the district court on or before Dec. 31 of each year; the annual report to vansist of the past year's minutes of the Charter C�nissioai meetings, along with a aover letter signed by the Chairperson indicating this is the annual report and citing State Statute 410.05, S�ibd. 2. Mr. Hunt stated the Nwe�r miriutes would not be appraved by the Charter CaYmissian until t�ir Januazy meeting, and the annual report was tA be sub�nitt,ed on a caler�dar year basis . Ms. Hendley stated she d.id not think the minutes had to be apprwed miriutes, and the Novenber minutes vould be submitted alcxig with the rest of the year's minutes. MTNNESOTA STATUTES 19$8 ZOS.t2t MUMC[PAL EI.BC[74NS 205.11 MS 1957 [Repealed, 1959 c 675 art 13 s tj 205.11 MS 1982 �[Repealod, 1983 c b2 s 12] 205.12 MS l957 (Repeated, 1959 c 67S art 13 s 1] 205.12 MS 1974 [Repealed, 1976 c 44 s'l0] aT24 205.121 NOMINATING PETITIONS; CTTIFS OF FIRST CLASS; SICNATURES. A nominating petition 61ed on behalf of a candidate for municipa! oA'icx in a city of ehe 8nt class shall be signed by eGgible votea who maintain rcsidencx in the election disuict from which the candidate is to be elected. The number of signers shall equal 500, or two percent of the total auraber of individuals who vated ia the municipality. ward, or other election district at the last proceding municipat general election, which- ever is greater. History: 1981 c 29 art 7 s 9 205.13 MS t 957 [Repealed, 1959 c 675 att 13 s! J 205.13 CANDIDATE.S, FILING. Subdivision 1. Ai�darit ot cmdidac�r. Not more than ( l) eight nor less than six weefcs in the case of a town, or (2) not mon than ten nor 1as thsn eiaht walcs, in the case of a city, befon the municipsl primaty, or befon the municipal general election if then is ao municipal primary, an individuai who is eligible and desira to become a candidate for an of6c� to be voted for at the election shall 61e an affidavit of candidacy with the municipal clerk. The affidavit shall be in substantiaUy the same form as that in section 204B.06, subdivision l. The municipal clerk shall also accept an applicatioa signed by not {ess than five voters and filed on behalf of an eligible voter in the municipality whom they desire to b� a candidate, if service of a copy of the appiicatioa has ban made on the candidate and proof of strvice is endorsed on the application being 61td. UQon receipt of the proper filing fce, the clertc shall plave the aame of the candidate on the ofiicial ballot without partisaa dtsignation. 'The filing data contained in thia subdivision do not apply to any home nile charter city whose chaRer provides for earlier filing dates. Subd. 2. 1�Iotia o! 81in� data. At least two weeks befon the first day to fi!e affidavits of candidacy, the municipal clerfc shail publish a notice stating the first aad last dates on which affidavits of candidary may be filed in the clerk's o�a and� the closing time for 61iag on the last day for filing. The clerk shall post a similu notia at least ten days before the fint day to filo a9'idavits of candidacy. Subd. 3. Filin� lea. Unless the charter of a city provida the amount of the fa for filing an appiication or affidavit of candidacy for city office, the 51inf fa for s municipal office 'ss as follows: (a} Ia first class cities, 520; (b) in second and thitd class cida, SS; aad (c) In fourth class cities and towas. S2. Subd. 4. Petition in plaa ot fas. A candidate for municipal oBia may fik a petition in place of the filing fees speci6ed ia subdivision 3. The petition shall meet the requiremenu of sectioa 204B.1 l, subdivision 2. Subd. S. Nominatin� petido� ddes of t6e &st class. A nomin�atin� petition 6led on behalf of a candidate for municipal oBia in a city of the first class shall be signed by eligible voters who reside in the election disvict from w6ich the andidau is to be clected. The number of sigaen shall be at least 500. or two perant of the total number of individuals who voted in tbe municipality, wsM, or other election district at the last prcceding muaicipal geaeral electioq whichever is �rater. Subd. 6. Withdrawsl. A caadidate for a municipal elective oQ'ioe may arithdtaw from the election by filin� an affidavit of withdnwai with the municipal clert by 12 4D �oo �m �W m m m�� am i� rn v � o 0 � � U .` � � a w �n m n m C � �p �- y O Q m � C�D C N O � `�c�� a c 0 � � � r U !� y m � C C C �O ti 'u. O � �oo m �� m � � �, �o� ama � N � � �O U a`w`�' � Y C ..y+ � H � � � � Q m Q � � � � � � M � �i � � � � � � � � Q a� �yc� iiU� a� c c �� ii O � 0 �o �� W m� C O � M �a�¢ r o � E � a`w H Y m m m C � � ; � O � � Q m Q ^ am � � y � ti U � c � ii O � � � 4E 5 � s cinroF F�� DATE: T0: FROM: CO1�IlMUNITY DE�JELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUlVI March 15, 1989 William Burns, City Manaqer �� Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator SUBJECT: First Readinq of an Ordinance Approving a Rezoning, ZOA �88-04, Community Development Corporation Attached is the staff report for the proposed rezoninq request by Community Development Corporation to rezone the property adjacent to St. William's church from R-2 and C-2 to R-3. Included in the report is the response from Community Development Corporation regarding the proposed exterior construction materials as well as the staff analysis of the applicant's information. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the ordinance for first reading. BD/dn M-89-129 P � CI�TY OF FRiDLEY IREQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST I LOCATION I StTE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES 8� ZONING UTUTES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FlNANCIAL IMPLICATIONS STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE x/A PLAI�NG COMIV�SSION DATE November 9, �988 CI'TY COUVCIL DATE : February 13 , 1989 q�Hpq BD/dn CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBIUTY WfTH ADJACENT USES � ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMME(�ATION APPEALS RECOMMENOATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ZOA �t 88-04 Community Development Corporation for the Archdiocese of Minneapolis and St. Paul Rezoning request from R-2 and C-3 to R-3 Northwest corner of 5th Street and 61st Avenue, north of St. William's church. � 2.79 acres N/A R-2 and C-3 North, R-2 (duplexes); South, C-3 (church); East, R-I (single family); West, C-3 (strip center). Municipal services available. $750.00 for residential lot split. HRA assistance may be requested. Xes. Yes. 0 Site is depressed below street elevation, currently used as a ballfield. Approval. N/A � , 5A Staff Report, ZOA #8$-04 Community Development Corporation Norwood Square Page 2 REQUEST The subject parcel, Lots 1- 16, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 30, Block 3, Norwood Addition, is bisected by two zoning districts. The R- 2, Two Family Dwelling district is located on the eastern half of the property, immediately adjacent to 5th Street N.E. The C-3, General Shopping Center district is located on the western half of the property, abutting the Moon Plaza Shopping Center property. This zoning pattern exists from the subject property south to 61st Avenue N.E. and includes the existing church property. The R-2 district permits "housing for the elderly" as a special use permit and the C-3 district permits "housing for the elderly" as a permitted use; however, staff advised the applicant to petition for a rezoning in order that the property could be evaluated by one district's regulations rather than having the property regulated by two districts. The R-2 and C-3 districts do not contain the appropriate lot and structure requirements to regulate the proposed project. Further, the continuation of commercial zoning along the rear portion of the Moon Plaza Shopping Center would not be appropriate. Finally, the rezoning application to R-3 would provide a buffer from the existing C-3 zoning to the west and south. ANALYSIS In evaluating zoning district changes, the intent, uses and structure regulations of the proposed district should be evaluated to determine its compatibility with adjacent zoning and land uses. The intent of the R-3 district is to permit a variety of residential housing, including single family dwellings, two�family dwellings and multiple dwelling complexes. These uses serve as a buffer from uses permitted by commercial districts, such as the C- 3 district. Further, while the R-3 district permits multiple family cvmplexes at a higher density than the R-1 or R-2 districts, multiple family dwellings can be compatible with single and two family dwellings depending on design and location. The R-3 district permits hotels, motels and highrise apartment buildings as a special use permit. As special uses, the City would have the ability to deny potential applications if the use would have adverse effects on the neighborhood. Upon preliminary evaluation, these uses would not be appropriate at this location. The lot and structure requirements in the R-3 district are more restrictive than the setbacks in the R-2. The required setbacks will maintain a 35 foot yard area along 5th Street N.E. and a 15 foot yard area adjacent to the existing duplexes to the north. The lot area requirement dictates 2,500 square feet per living 5B Staff Report, ZOA #88-04 Community Development Corporation Norwood Square Page 3 unit, however, the ordinance reduction per underground paY regulation is to discourage as and maximize the amount of open split application explains the on the church property in orde� lot area requirements. CONSISTENCY WITH 5C also allows a 300 square foot ting space. The intent of this �uch on-surface parking as possible space. The staff report on the lot necessity for a lot area easement for the proposed site to meet the IVE PLAN The proposed rezoning request will be consistent with the intent of the comprehensive plan to provide a variety of housing types in order to meet the different housing needs of the•City's residents. The subject parcel is specifically identified in the comprehensive plan as having potential for medium density housing development (see attachment). The proposed rezoning is also consistent with the objectives of the Center City Redeve�.opment district in that it will enable utilization of long vacant property. SUMMARY The proposed rezoning is appropriate as it will act as a buffer between the existing commercial use and the lower density residential neighborhoods to the north and east. The rezoning will also eliminate two zoning districts bisecting the property. Finally, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the redevelopment effort of the Center City district. Staff recommendation for approval of the rezoning is conditioned upon approval of the lot split request since it is necessary to execute a lot area easement. It is not conditioned upon approval of the special use permit request, since approval of the zoning action is necessary in order to consider the special use permit request. RECOMMENDATION Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of ZOA #88-04 to rezone Lots 1- 16, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 30, Block 2, Norwood Addition, from R-2 and C-3 to R-3, subject to approval of lot split, L.S. #g8-05. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTYON The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of ZOA #88-04, to rezone the subject parcel from R-2, Two Family Dwelling and C-3, General Shopping, to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, subject to approval of the lot split request. 5D Staff Report, ZOA #88-04 Community Development Corporation Norwood Square Page 4 CITY COUNCIL ACTION At the February 13, 1989 City Council meeting, the public hearing for the rezaning request was closed, and the special use permit request was tabled in order to study the types of materials proposed for the exterior facade. In response to the City Council's concern, Muffie Gabler from Community Development Corporation, has analyzed the construction and rental cost impacts of using different building materials (see attached letter dated March 9, 1989), specifically brick and wood versus rock face block and aluminum siding. Ms. Gabler states that providing an all brick exterior will increase construction costs, interest and fees by $195,500. This would cause an additional rental cost per unit of $34.00 per month. She also states that an all brick exterior would present too much of an institutional appearance. Another option proposed is to replace the rock face block with brick to the first floor windows. This would increase construction costs by $73,300 and increase rental costs by $13.00 per unit per month. Gabler states that Community DeveZopment Corporation will not accept any scenario which includes wood siding because of its high maintenance and construction costs. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff maintains its original recommendation to approve the proposed materials, including the rock face block to the first floor, and aluminum siding and stucco. The proposal is an appropriate architectural treatment, given the location of the building in this particular neighborhood. As the applicant correctly paints out, the proposed finishes are predominant with other housing structures in the neighborhood. In order to address the Council's concerns, the applicant has proposed an alternative to use a brick exterior to the first floor windows. While brick has been incorporated into recent multi-family projects such as Springbrook Apartments, the rock face block is an acceptable alternative. It is recommended the City Council approve the ordinance for first reading. � ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: Lots 1 through 16, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 30, Block 2, Norwood Addition to Fridley Park. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District R- 3, General Multiple Dwelling. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District R-2 (Two Family Dwelling) and C-3 (General Shopping Center) to R-3 (General Multiple Dwelling). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: February 13, 1989 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 5E t:. ti I i i i I i i. � I � � i �—" �- ZOA 1688-04 � . . 'sic '' . ..� �--•- - o y ` � t opment ��-� '1• . °. • =�`:�. . . . �.� r'y''' a O iu < ` - ��i j . _ .-�: , 1�11'1i' 6:: .f � � f>o;.. ` .�y=a � �; � + , � —� •:, c . �� u► � "�. 3� : '�- I . =_• :, � o3c � °��- ��« : ::}};; _ : � � -ra e.. �� • Q �2 'e, 62. = •`iii a �, � i:� + �.❖• � . . ,. O � F.. • oc�vt :j;S . • .:; ., Z N ;a� s � :ii� � � ; i's!� '_`� :;. .,`: • . . . _. �w .q, • �.1 ��. -- � ,;; . . . . • . t . � , ./ '� I � ' h■ /nM�+ +Z 1� "�� —' . II � � '\ , . � '�' /' � '� �I ►_, EI " � � ,', � �' ►� " ►�, i=1 �►�� _ _ �� I ' � I•1• 'F i . � � , . � � i j� . , . , , '; ,s. i !!' ' � �' � ,,; ��! • � ' '� �j � � � � i ��' �{ i y. .. I' . � � � 1 � :� �1 � �'�1 �� ' I� �Ni �� l�'' ��Il.a i� 1 �� { � ��,;; .�, -.=,� i1N� � . • ��11��,1`: �`� �� .. . ii11� • � �• 'l �� !�4 � i i ,�.•'.%y��tM^ �I�, ` �•� �{ ' ! B�� • 1 h/ i:V.�' i'sS%��,,� F f' ��;i—�; I � �. ,�\ i , ,��` • .� . .. ! . \ � ' ' �' '�33�. . . � . .�' � � . .. , , • •�� ...;. , , I .. � � . '�� r�i;� '� w e��w, = O�L.._�il lj. � � I � � � � � i � � � , .' O (� �1.1 ��. ,'�• � � �: : ��, � . , . o �i�,� '; �� i. ~�,� �' � �x� � � i'� ' � � � � � S. , -�- •j 9�'� .��y.'� � I � . �;,r_�,.. � ; �� , o �� g ; ; .�� _ �� I � �� , ►� � ►,�■� ►r i � . ^ � � � 1 � I . 3 � ; � '' �'� � �- �! �i ��9 �� , . � � �� i < � ,I ; � ��: i• � i . � ,i 1 :, 5F 5H WESTMINSTLR C4RPORATION Ms. Barbara Dacy Planning Coordinator City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Exterior finish for Norwood Square Dear Barb: 328 West Sixth Street Saint Paul, MI`[ 55142 Phone 612-291-1750 Mazch 9, 1989 This letter is in response to your recent meeting with DorE Mead of Housing Resources Corporation and John Culligan of Boarman & Associates. As y�u know, we have proposed that the exterior finish for Norwood Square in- clude rock face block to the first floor windows, vith a combination of atucco and aluminum siding above the rock face block. These materials were aelected primarily for the following reasons: 1. General appearance -- The proposed materials would give Norwood Square a more residential appearance than an all-brick exterior would, In addition, stucco and siding are the predominant finishea on the other housing in the neighborhood; and we felt it important to design the building to complimeat its residentiaL neighbors. By contrast, with an all-brick exterior, Norwood Square would visually relate moze to St. William's Church than to the residen- tial neighborhood and would provide less of a visual "transition" betweea the Church/commercial areas to the south and west and the residen tial areas to the north and east; 2. Building mass and impression of height -- By utilizing contrasting materials, horizontal bandings of the building are achieved. Coup2ed with the use of a hip roof (which is the predominant resi- dential roof ia the neighborhood), the horizontal bandings attract the eye to a loWer level of the building, thereby giving Norwood Square the appearance of being shorter than it is. With the proposed materials in mind, we have also endeavored to minicaize the mass of the building. The major technique the archi- tect developed to address this challenge is the use of the "H" shape of the structure. This important feature effectively breaka the building up into three distinct sections, which minimizes the overall impression of the scale o£ the 6uflding. A Wholly-owned Subsidiary of Community Development Corporation for the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis Ms. Barbara Dacy March 9, 1989 Page 2 _ ___ _ _.�..._......, ,..� ._ � . -.._ ..-.,..o�.-._........_.. ^ ..,... �--... _ _ _.._ _ _ -- 51� If the exterior of the minimizing function of We would have to look brick exterior in mind; building were constructed of all brick, the the "H" shape would be substantially lost. at re-designing the building with an all- 3. Maintenance -- Enclosed is a listing of four different scenarios in which the exterior finish of Norwood Square would be chsnged from the finish that has been proposed: (i) Replacing the aluminum siding with vood aiding; (ii) Replacing the rock face block with brick (to the first floor window sills); (iii) Combining scenarios (i) and (ii) [replaciag the aluminum siding with wood siding and replacing the rock face block with brickj; and (iv) Providing an all-brick exterior. Because they include wood siding, scenarios (i) and (iii) are not acceptable to the Community Development Corporation. Aside from its higher construction costs, wood siding requires constant attention. It would raise the on-going maintenance costs, would provide an annual inconvenience to residents, and would increase the amount of staff time that must be devoted to non-productive activities. Because they are low-maintenance materials, rock face block, alumi- num siding and brick are all acceptable to us from a management perspective; 4. Development costs and affordability -- We are making every effort to develop Norwood Square on a basis that vill make the housing affordable to modest-income seniors. We are striving to ach£eve rents that start at approximately $500 per month for the smallest (610 square feet) one-bedroom units. Even without a brick exterior, ve already knov that we Will need all the help we can ge t in order to achieve the goal of rents starting at $500 for a 610-square-foot one-bedroom unit. By way of comparison, housing for seniors developed under HUD's Section 202 program is now resulting in rents of approximately $515 for one- bedroom units that include only 540 square feet of living space. Even with those smaller units, 202 housing usually requires munici- pal assistance in order to make the renta of $515 "work". Ms. Barbara Dacy March 9, 1989 Page 3 We are very concerned that the coat of a brick exterior vill make Norwood Square less affordable for the seniors who need it most. Although I personally don't care for their coloz schemes, I point out that the townhouses across from the City's cnrrent offices have aluminum siding. Also, the all-brick five-story building adjacent to the townhouses provides a more institutional appearance than the impression we would like Norwood Square to convey. Barb, I would be happy to discuss these subjects with you in more detail and will plan to attend the March 20th meeting of the City Council. I look forward to seeing you again then. Very truly yours, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAINT PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS � _ .1 - _.. <'_/ Mary S. Gabler Director of Development SD�I : em Enclosures cc Father John Brandes Mr. Malcolm Mitchell 5J VORWOOD SQL'ARE *larch 6 � 1989 ESTIMATED EFFECT of EXTERIOR FINISHES on AVERAGE UNIT MONTHLY RENT and MINIMUM RESIDENT INCOME REQUIREMENT Starting point (rock face block to lst floor windows; combination of stucco and aluminum siding above) Replace aluminum siding with painted wood siding Replace rock face block with brick (brick to lst floor windows) Replace rock face block with brick and aluminum siding with painted wood siding Provide all-brick exterior 5K Additional Additional Additional unit rent annual income construction costs, required required of interest and fees per month residents*� N/A $ 30,600 73,300 103,900 195,500 N/A $ g* 13 20* 34 * including additional reserves Lo pay for on-going maintenance ** based on 40x of income paid toward housing expense N/A $ 240 390 .�� 1,020 0 s cinroF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: C01�IlMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTIV�ENT M EMO RAN D UM March 15, 1989 William Burns, City Manaqer .h � �' Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator SU&TECT: Consideration of Eliminatinq a Condition of Approval, VAR �88-26, Stylmark, Inc., 6536 Main Street N.E. BACKGROUND The Appeals Commission recommended approval of a variance request on November 15, 1988 to grant a setback variance for an addition to the existing Stylmark buildinq. The four stipulations attached to the approval were as follows: 1. The addition be architecturally compatible with existinq building. 2. The applicant submit a landscape plan to the City staff for review and approval prior to buildinq permit issuance. The plan shall increase the existing parking lot screeninq from public right-of-way. Landscaping to be installed by June 1, 1989. 3. 4. Prior to building permit issuance, Stylmark shall submit a site plan which will delineate a 21 stall parking lot for future use if a shortage of stalls occur and is deemed necessary by the City. � , Future buildinq expansion shall occur to the north, to minimize future need for future variances on the south aide. on December 19, 1988, the City Council unanimously approved the variance with the four stipulations. Stylmark has since with stipulations stipulation #2 and stipulation. applied for a buiidinq permit and has complied #1 and �3; however, Stylmark is objectinq to would like the City Council to eliminate this � Stylmark, Inc. March 15, 1989 Page 2 ANALYSIS The intent of stipulation #2 is to increase the screening between the abutting streets and the parking lot�and loading dock area (see copies of photos of site) consistent with ordinance requirements Section 205.I7.07.D(5) and Section 205.17.05.D(6)(a). As one travels down the frontage road of Mississippi Street and approaches the intersection of Main Street, the loading dock is in clear view of the public right-of-way. After building permit application, staff inet with Sylmark's representative, Don Mooty. We recommended that shrubbery be placed along the boulevard area between the parking lot and the frontage road and five evergreens or pyramidal arborvitae be planted around the immediate area abutting the loading dock. Mr. Mooty objected to the landscaping between the parking lot and the frontage road because the road is only used for the school bus traffic in the mornings and afternoons (buses are parked on the site to the north of Stylmarkj and because the parking lot cannot be seen from the traveled right-of-way of Mississippi Street. Staff agreed that the landscaping in this area could be waived; however, we stated that screening should be installed to meet the ordinance requirements near the loading dock. At that point, Mr. Mooty indicated that Stylmark would be relocating an existing crab tree that had to be moved because of the proposed building addition. Stylmark then submitted a revised perspective drawing, showing the revised location of the crab tree. Despite the relocation of this tree, staff recommended that additional screening was needed to screen the loading dock area. In order to ease maintenance activities around the loading dock area, an aiternative was suggested to plant three evergreen trees to the northeast of the Stylmark sign closer to the street and in a fashion as to not interrupt the underground sprinkling system. The trees would be six feet in height at planting. David Brink, President of Stylmark Inc., objected to the additional planting requirements because of the following reasons (Mr. Brink chose not to submit a letter identifying his objections and agreed to allow staff to summarize his objections for the Council): 1. Stylmark has been part of the community for a number of years and has maintained their grounds in a c2ean and park-like fashion. 2. The additional plantings will increase maintenance time and cost in mowing and trimming around the base of the three trees. 6A . : Stylmark, Inc. March 15, 1989 Page 3 3. Landscaping was not required when a variance request for an addition on the north side of the building was approved in 1985. 4. The adjacent homeowners had no objections to any of the variance requests and have no concerns regarding increasing the landscaping. RECOMMENDATION The intent of the stipulation is to increase the landscaping between the parking and loading areas from the public right-of-way. The installation of three additional evergreen trees is not unlike the stipulations of approval the City has imposed on other industrial owners in the past to upgrade landscaping on the site. The relocation of the crab tree will not screen the loading area from the street on a year round basis. Staff recommends the Council maintain the stipulation of approval. Mr. Brink has submitted a letter in conjunction with his building permit agreeing to install the three trees, should the Council decide not to approve his request. BD/dn M-89-131 1. Photos of site; 2. Site plan; 3. Appeals Commission minutes, November 11, 1988; 4. City Council minutes, December 19, 1988; 5. Letter signed by applicant acknowledging stipulations. � ;:;� . . y, , � '� I / ,, • �» , ,, � . , � � i � �vvr - :��..� ... - -- ' il /`-'L-� C.71/C�K- ��r'��L/" sc ��T � �u �� NC� , e i1 ��N � �'v ., .; � � . � � � � '• •. .; i I . j I � � �• F�fZ`T� N G Sl PCr, FfN.�I.EI.s`jb�-o� � � . i �� .� �40', � ,. E t�. M . ��+ �. — S�o ��s,�tc.t:NCr -- . : . �i �� ] . •, ` � � -•- � i•. • , •.► . , .• , . • .� .'t � '••• � �"' � • � � " ' ' F,�,s'r � 1s3 'A'�Ns � . : . � � �' . � . . � _ : , • . , �'i - � 5�r'-� : •: • � ''• . � ` � .. . � � ` .. . � � �• '. . � . ; � . . • • i 4t, ' � . •' , J � 2�' 'x E�{' . � . � : . � � � ; �� • ' • # �,. � , . • � .• � � i � � �� - I t�4rlNG� d��s _ � . . ., . . . .. . . .. , . � • � , �t:,r' ;, . .z.�" , . ` . � � . •' , , � t- . .Zif�/�'s « � . . � .� • • � • . � � � • , . � ` , �, � � • �,..� � • ' . � j�, `� • . �� J � � , � . . _•' • � ' �. . . .. , ,I� � . . I` , .� � � ',w� - � :• . � , • . • :+ ^� • • • � �. � `� E � � . v _ � �_.� � _� ; �- b a p: � --�' �� . � �� . ��-r p� �►� �,�s pl.Q7. t��z�Z ��rloN : - - ��-� ��.._ �� G .:. i ��._ c�� pc�+z�- . ��TN �°►nnr-rl� �� ApPg,ALS (X�T4ISSION� �:"� 15, 1988 CALZ TO ORDF�2: Chairperson Barna called the November 15, 1988, �als Camiission meetinQ to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CAI� : riembers Present: Alex Barna. Diane Savage, Kenneth Vos. Jerry Shere�c, Larzy Kuechle Members Absent: None Others Present: Darrel Clark, Chief Building Official Ernie Otto, Stylmark Donn Mooty, Stylmark ' APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 11, 1988, APPFALS C-'CNMISSIGN M�TING: !��I'ION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Nl�'• S�erek, to apQrove the 4ctaber 11, 1988, Appeals Conmission meeting to approve the Octaber 11, 1988, Appeals Catmissi� meeting minutes approved as written. CPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VC7I'ING AYE, CHAIRP�.�1 B�N� DDCLAftID THE T10TION CARRIID iJ!�IAI�I II�10U SLY . CONSIDF�2ATION CJF' A VARIP,NCE RF�,X7EST, VAR #88-26, BY mNN MO(7TY: Pursuant to Section 205.17.03.D, 4, a), of the Fridley City C�e to reduce the front yarrl setback fran a street right-of-way abutting a resic3ential clistrict frcm 100 feet to 47.9 feet to allaa the construction of an addition to the exist- ing building on Lots 2-10, Block 6, Rioe Creek Plaza, South Additivn, the same being 6536 Main Street N.E. (Stylmark). MdTION by Mr. Kuechle, seoonded by Ms. Savage, to apen the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VdI'E, AI�L VOTING AYE, CI-�IRPII2..SON BAi22� DDCI�ARID Ti� PUBLIC HF.AFZING OPII�1 AT 7:06 P.M. Chairperson Barna read the Ac�ninistrative Staff Report: ADNiIl1ISTRATIVE STAFF REP(3RT= 5536 Main Street N.E. VAR #88-26 . .� . . .� �• �� : - a• r a i� Section 205.17.03.D,(4),(a), requfres any building in an industrial district abutting a residential district to be no closer than 100 feet to a street right-of-way line. 6E � 6F APPF�I...S C(r'MISSIG�1 I�rII�1G, NO�TF� 15, 1988 PAGE 2 Public p�.�pos� served by this requirement is to provide adequate q�en spaoe areas arwnd industrial structures fo� aesthetic and fire fighting purposes. B. STATID F�RDSHIP: "F�cisting building is at this setback." C. ACMIlVISI�iATIVE STAF'� REV�1: The petitioner,3tylmark, is requesting a variance which would reduoe the front yard setback required for an industrial building adjacent to a residential district from 100 feet to 47.9 feet. Stylmark is proposing to construct an a�iition which w�ould canfoYm with the existing front building setback and utilize tlie current building layout. The addition will provide additional office, cafeteria, and bathn�an facilities. The City has previwsly approved tw�o similar requests fram this pro*�erty. The first variance was granted in August 1973 which reduced the front yard setback from 100 feet to 41.9 feet for the o�nstnsction of an office addition. Another variance was appr'avEad in Navember 1985 which reduced the front yard setback fran 100 feet to 82 feet to constru�ct a warehouse addition. A variance is justified if tlze strict application of the zoning ordinance would cause undue hardship for tl�e prapP-rty oGn�er because of the site's characteristics. Stylmark is situated on 9.3 acres of industrial land. The existing building is located on the southern enc3 of the site ar�d covers 16$ of the land. This location provides anple e�ansion q�portunities to the north of tlze buiZding withc�ut t1�e necessity of a varia�ce. If this area was used to e�and, the petitioner cauld not utilize the existing floor layout. Therefore, the hardship is actually created by the building itself and not the site's characteristics. Consideratio� sha�ld be given to this but also to the fact that two similar requests have been previously appraved for this property. This pr�osal oarplies wi:th all otl�er applicable zoning rec3uir�nents exoePt for parking supply. C�rrently, the site contains 95 spaces, 76 of �ich are used by its 77 einplayees. The pro�osed additicn wauld increase the n��i�er of spaces required fran 110 to 116. Due to t1�e actual number of eirployees, the application of this oniinanoe may be irn�alid. Staff suggests that the petitioner submit a site plan at the time of bui2cling perna.t applica- tion which would delineate a 21 stall parkinq lot for future use if a parkirg shortage does occur and is deemed necessary by ti'�e City. If approved, staf f reoanrends the follvari.ng crnditions be attac��ed to the permit: 1. The addition be architecturally oa�ati.ble with the existinq buildinq. 2. � aPPlicant shall sut�mit a landscape plan to the Qty and approval prior to the building pezmit issu�r�oe. increase the e�dsting parking lat screeni.nq from public I�ndscapi� to be installed by June 1, 1989. Staff far a revie�,r T�e pl.an shall right-of-way. �C� APP�LS c.'ONMISSION N�rING, N(7�1II`'LB�t 15, 1988 PAGE 3 3. Prior to building permit issuance, Stylmark shall sutmit a site plan which would delineate a 21 stall parking lot for future use if a shortage of stalls oocurs and is deemed necessazY bY the City. 4. F�ture building ex�ansion shall oocur to the rorth to minimize the need for future variances ai the south side. Mr. Clark shaaed an aerial photo of the pY+q�erty• Be stated Stylmark is proposing to construct the new office additiori at the same front yard setback as the original building. He stated Mr. Otto and r'1�'• P'botY weY'e at the meeti�g to ariswer any questions the Crnmissioners might have. Mr. Clark sho�wed an elevation of the property and a layout showir�g the existi.ng characteristics of the present office area. It dgronstrates that if they are going to add office space, the proposed location was the most logical one. Dr. Vos asked what kind of relationship Stylmark had with its neighbors. NLr. Mooty stated they have a very good relationship with their n�eighbors. As far as he knew, they have nev�er had any problans with the neighbors• MOTION b�� Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to close the public hearing. U?ON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VCITING AYE, CI�IRPER90N BAF2NA ��LARED THE pUBLIC HEP,RING CT.AS� AT 7: SS P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he lives in this general area, althouc� not on Main Street. He stated he thought Stylrnark was a v�ery nice loaking business with clean, well kept grounds. He would be in favor of revocrcr�ending approval of the variance with s tipulations . Nir. Sherek stated this looked like a good plan, and Stylmark has been a good neighbor in Fridley's o�rercial oanmuiity. He wnuld vote in favor of the variance . Ms. Savage stated she also agreed. The building is very attractive, and it does not intrude into the residential area. Fhat Sty]maxic is requ�esting is a setback that is alreaciy exi.sting with the original building. She could see no reasce-� to deny the variance when, on two previous occasions, variances w�ere granted. 5he would be in fawr of the varianve. Dr. Vos stated this was a reasonable request, and Stylmark was keeping the site lines the same on Main Street. iie would wte in fawr of the variance als�. Mr. Barna stated he was also in fawr of reca�errling approval of the variance. The building would look nice architecturally. fr m 6H APPEAI.S C'Q�+4�SZSSION I�E.'TING, I�1II�iBF�t 15, 1988 PAGE 4 • � M�ION by Dr. Vos, seoorrled by P1s. Sava9e, to rec��e�1 �o �tY ��il apprcNal of variance request, VAR �88-26, liy Dorui P'botY, Pursu�nt to Secti�n 205.17.03.D, (4) .(a) , of the Fridley City Code to reduce the fr�t yard setback fron a str�et nght-of- way abutting a residential district frcm 100 feet to 47.9 feet to a11a�► rhe cor�stn�ctioa� of an addition to the exi.stinq building cn Lots 2-10, Blocjc 6, Rice Creek Plaza, Sotilth Adclition, the saane be.ing 6536 Main Street N.E. (Stylmark) , with the following stipulations: • 1. The addition be architecturally ornipatible with th�e existinq building. 2, 2he applicant shall submit a lanclscape plan to the CitY Staff far a revie�a and appraval prior ta the build.ing permi.t issuanae. Zhe pla¢� shall increase the existing parking lot screenix�g fmn public righ�-of-way. Iandscapit�g t�o be ins ta lled by Jtme 1, 19 89 3. Prior to building permit issuanve, Stylmark shall sutxnit a site plan which would delineate a 21 stall parking lot for future use if a shorta9°e of stalls occurs and is deemed necessary by the City. 4. F�.�ture building expansion shall oocur to the north to minunize the r�eed for future variances on the south side. UPON A VQZCE VOTE, ALL V�ING AYE� Ci�,IRPgLSOD1 BARNA DDC7�RID Ti� MCYTIaN CARRIID UNrIIQ�� SLY . t�L . Clark stated this item w�uld go tA the City Cau�cil on Deceqr�ber 19, 1988. CONSIDF�'.ATZON OF 1989 CQM�IISSION MEETING DATE:: M(7TION by Ms. Savage, secorxied by Mr. Kuechle, to appxtive the 1989 Ap�peals Cumtission meeting dates as presented with the follaaing c!'�arx3e: Oct�L�er 31 to be changed to October 24. UPON A VOIC� VOTE, ALL VInING AYE � CHAIRPER.9�N B� DDCS�D Tf� MOTION CARRIID UNA.'�IIP'1(JiJSLY. .. � 1:. �,�.r� MC7I'ION by Mr. Sherek, secorrled by Mr. Kued�le, to adjaurn tt.a meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Barna declared t2ye Nov. 15, 1988, A�eals Ccamission meeting adjo�u�ed at 7:55 p.m. Respectfully sutm,itted, . . � = ,%,r 7. � /� �. i „� r � Lyn� S�ba Rec.rording Secret.ary � ____.� 6� �RIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 19 1988 PAGE 10 Ms. Rotterick stated there was legislation i.n 1987 proposed by APAC to protect residents of mobile home parks. She stated.there is reference in the State statute to the City's responsibility, if there is taxpayer's money involved. She stated the City would be required to hold a hearing, if there is a park closinq to discuss the issues and help determine the park owner's and developer's responsibility. She stated their group argued against the City being involved in this legislation. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. RECEIVING THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF DECEMBER 7, 1988: A. CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND SETTING A PUBLI� HEARING FOR P S #88-02 NORTHCO BEING A REPLAT OF TRACTS A AND B REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 6, AND TRACT B REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO 78 GENERALLY LOCATED AT 500 73RD AVENUE N E, BY FRIDLEY BUSINESS CENTER PARTNERSHIP: MoTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this preliminary plat for January 9, 1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of December 7, 1988. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Billings stated he wanted the Planning Commission to know the Council is aware of their concerns regarding the light rail transit system. 3. CONSZDERATION OF A VARIANCE VAR #88-26, TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM A STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ABUTTING A RESIDENTIAL STREET FROM 100 FEET TO 47.9 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. 6536 MAIN STREET N.E..BY STYLMARK: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to grant variance, VAR �88-26, with the following stipulations: (1) the addition be architecturally compatible with the existinq buildinq; (2) the applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the City staff for review and approval prior to the building permit issuance. The plan shall increase the existing parking lot screeninq from public right-of-way. Landscaping to be installed by June-1, 1989; (3) prior to building permit issuance, Stylmark shall submit a site plan which would delineate a 21 stall parkinq lot for future use � FRIDLEY CZTY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 19 1988 PAGE 11 if a shortage of stalls occurs and is deemed necessary by the City; and (4) future building expansion shall occur to the .north to minimize the need for future variances on the south side. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ' 4. CONSIDERATZON OF APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH HEA�,TH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INC FOR SENIOR HOUSING STUDY AND SURVEY• ,' Ms. Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated the total contract amount will not exceed $12,000. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the contract with Health Planning and Management Resources, Inc. for a Senior Housing Study and Survey. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. CONSIDERATION OF AN EXTENSION OF STREET VACATION AGREEMENT WITH TARGET WAREHOUSE: Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated in 1984, Target acquired a 54 acre parcel on Highway 65, between 71st Avenue and 73rd Avenue, for expansion. He stated the project has been delayed and the four year street relocation agreement approved by the City and Target on January 21, 1985 needs to be extended one year. MOTZON by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the extension and first amendment of the street relocation agreement with Target. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. CONSIDERATION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT WZTH RECYCLE MINNESO�'� RESOURCES FOR 71ST AVENUE AND UNIVERSITY AVENUE: Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated this is a renewal of a lease agreement with Recycle Minnesota Resources. He stated the two significant additions to this agreement is that the City allow RMR to construct a small storage area to the,east of the existing structure and the City work to improve security at the site by installing additional fencing at the south end. Mr. Robertson stated Recycle Minnesota Resources has performed well under the previous aqreement and it is staff's recommendation this agreement be approved for November 1, 1988 through November 1, 1991. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve this lease agreement for the period November 1, 1988 through November 1, 1991 with Recycle 6J / � CITYOF FRiDLE.Y 6K CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450 CITY COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN NOTICE Stylmark Donn Mooty 6536 Main Street N.E. Fridley, I�i 55432 December 21, 1988 On December 19, 1988, the Fridley City Council officially approved your request for a variance, VAR #88-26, by Donn Mooty, to reduce the front yard setback from a� street right-of-way abutting a residential street from 100 feet to 47.9 feet to allow the construction of an addition to the existing building, located on Lots 2-10, Block 6, Rice Creek Plaza, S�uth Addition, the same being 6536 Main Street N.E., Fridley; Minnesota, 55432 (Stylmark), with the following stipulations: � 1. The addition be architecturally compatible with the existing building. 2. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the City staff for a review and apqroval prior to the building permit issuance. The plan shall increase the parking lot screening from public right-of-way. Landscaping shall be installed by June l, 1989. 3. Prior to building permit issuance, Stylmark shall submit a site plan which would delineate a 21 stall parking lot for future use if a shortage of stalls occurs and is deemed necessary by the City. 4. Future building expansion shall occur to the north to minimize the need for future variances. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. Si ce el � B rbara Dacy Planning Coordina Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and return one copy to the City of Fridley Planning Department by January 4, 1989. �s�-��d �Ia�a�-� Concur wit act on taken. Parks Streets Maintenanc�, MEMORANDUM �.' TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�• PW89-53 FROM: John G. Flora; Public Works Director DATE: March 16, 1989 SIIBJECT: Moore Lake Restoration Project Substate Agreement We have finally received an amended substate agreement from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for the Moore Lake Restoration Project. This amendment formally extends the project to December 31, 1989, from the original completion date of 1987 and allows for the State transfer of payments to the City in accordance with the original agreement. In order to obtain funds from the State, this substate agreement must be executed by the Mayor and a resolution submitted authorizing his authority to execute the agreement. Recommend the City Council approve the amendment to the substate agreement and the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the substate agreement on behalf of the City. JGF/ts Attachments 7 � _ � r :! �. 0 STATE OF MINN�SOTA POLLt1TION CONTROL A(:ENCY DIVISION OF WATER QUAI.ITY ' AMMENDED SUI3STA7'E AGRI:i:M�N'f ANU STATE GRANT AGREE114ENT WITERF.AS, the State of Minnesota. Pollution Control Agency has a Sub.atate Agreerrient No. 32100-DO1-$1 with City of Fridlcy to perform an implcmentation project� to reston the water quality of Moore Lakc rnd; W�IEREAS. additional time is required to complcte the tasks stated in the Agrcemcnt and WIICREAS, paragraph 111 A-2 providcs that: "Wvrk schedule commences on June 1, 1980 and termin�tes on llecember 31, 1987" NOW TIIEREFORE IT IS AGREED BY ANI) D[:TWFEN '1'lIE PAR7'IF,S IILRCTO: That paragraph III A-2 shall be amended to read: "Work schedule commences on June 1, 1980 and termin�tes on December 31, 1989" e 7A n _ _ .. . ... ..r...__---- 78 0 Page 2 of 3 WIiEREAS, Federal Grant Number 50055570-0]-W, as amended, provides a budget of: 9 Program Elements MPCA Administration Engineering Construction Legal and Administrative Testing and Inspection Total Program Elements Federal Share Non-federal Share Program Income Current Approved Budget E47.840 E253,354 i580,000 E100,000 a25.000 E1.006.195 5503,097 5503,098 -0- NOW TIiEREFORE IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES I�ERETO: Program Elements MPCA Administration Eng i neer i ng Construction Legal and Administration Testing and Inspection Total Program Flements Federal Share Non-federal Share Program Income New or Revised Budget E20,000 E249.617 b589,732 E118.922 E27.923 E1.006,195 b503.097 E503.098 -0- IN WITNESS WIiEREO�, this agrecmcnt shail bc cffcctivc �n thc date ot execution as to encumbrance by the Commissioner of Finance and shall remain in effect until December 31, 1989 or until all obligations set forth in this Agreement havt been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first � 0 LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT sy � Willi.am J_ Nee, Mayour Title Date �'� 20, 1989 Approved As to Form and Execntion By Authorized Title Signature Date � � _ 7C Page 3 of 3 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY By . Comraiaaioner ' Dau B� Date Approved As to Form and Eaecution 6y the Attorney General , Special Assistant Attorney General COMMISSIONER OF ADMIMSTRATION By _ _ Title Date .M�� COMMISSIONER OF FtNANCE ENCUMBERED DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE sy Title Date _ RE$OLIITION NO. - 1989 RESOLIITION AIITHORIZINa THE MAYOR TO E%ECIIT$ TH8 AMENDED SIIBSTATB AGREEMENT FOR THB MOORE LARE RFSTORATION PROJECT (EPA GRANT �30055570- 01-04) WHEREAB, the State of Minnesota and the City of Fridley have executed a substate agreement #32100-B01-81 to perform improvements for the restoration of water quality of Moore Lake, and WHEREAB, additional time is required to complete the tasks stated in the agreement, and WiiEREAB, certain budget amounts needs to be revised, and WHEREAB, the City of Fridley desires to complete the execution of the Moore Lake Restoration Project. N011, THEREFORE, B$ IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor, William J. Nee, is authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the City. PA88ED AND ADOPTED BY T8E CITY COONCILS OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK 7D Engineer�ny Sewer Water Parks Streets Mainlenanc�• MEMORANDUM �' TD: William W. Burns, City Managex,�� PW89-52 i�: Jahn G. Flora� Public Works Direct�or L1�,TE: March 16, 1989 SUBJECr: FYidley Municipal Center Inproven�ent Ptroject No. Z89 - Ct�arge Oz�er Nas. 1, 2, & 3 To aate, tY�e Fricuey r�unicipal cent�s Project xo. ls9 has five (5) ci�arige oraers irivolving twerity (20) proposal requests. Z�e City Council approved Change Order No. 4 on FebYV�aYy 14, 1989, arid Change Order No. 5 on FebruaYy 27, 1989. Change Ordex Nos. 1, 2, ar�d 3 voanbine praposals reqt�sts approved by the City M�nager but not previously received or appraved by th�e City Coiuicil. C�ange Order #1: vonsistir�g of praposal requests #1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 for a total vost of $16, 570. 00 irYVOlved roof, volwm� ar�d structural modifications identified when w�rk cc�unenoed on the old buildirq. C��ge Order #2: consisted of proposal request #5 for a total oost of $8,975.00 to s��port the r�eoe.ssaYy co�duit for increased lic�tiux� artid surveillanoe within the parking ra� desired by the HI2A. Change Orrlex #3: oonsisting of prr�posal requests #7, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, & 22 for a tatal oost of $21,157.00 cambines soane fire station revisions and tile ct�ar�ges fotuxi necessas.y as the renovation exposed buildi�g arad stn�ti.�al. deficiencies. It wvuld be appropriate for the City Cau�cil to re,oeive ar�d approve the first three ( 3) char�ge or�ers for th�e proj ect. Zhe attac�ied Q�arx�e Orders ide.ntifY the Pz�osal recNests and oosts for the renvvati� project within the three categories of Municipal Center, Fire Stati� ar�d Parkit�g Ranp. JGF/HJ/ts Attac�unerits , � � �, �. � � 8A QTY OF �2ID�E'Y IIJGIN�II�G �PAI�Tr - 6431 i�IIVIIZSI'I'Y AVE. , N.E. FRID�IESt, Md 55432 Mat�ch 20, 1989 Kraus-Arr3erso�3 oonst. do. 525 So. Eighth St. Mirn�apolis, I�I 55404 _ S'IJ�T�CT: Ct�vr�e OY+der No. 1. Pt�opo�l RequeSt Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, ar�d 12 far FYidley l�uiicipal Center In�mave�ent Ptnject rro. 189 Getitleaieri: Yau are hereby ordered, authorized, and instnicteci to modify ycur voa�t.ract for the FYidley Nhmicipal dent�er InQrov�aerYt Project No. 189 by addir�g the followir�g w�ork: Ad�ditiaa�►: P. R. _� ITII�I StJB00NI�2ACP0�2 AMCXJIJr Z�AL 1. Roof drain syst�a K1aAm M�ecii. $ 3, 206.00 C.V. Nielsos� 1,070.00 KranZ C�anst. 1,300.00 2. Wood bac�aip - Ootu�cil � 3. Mec�anical c�a.,se 4. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12 . Paured aor�r+ete Col� Anteru�a Anc3�or n o i�of Insulatiori Fire-floar levelit�g Irrigation rw��in Ea.st st;air-treat - . - •.; � ., •.�. � « ,- Park �t. Mi.tn'�eton)ca Iron C.V. Nelsan Aoo�u.st. Flaors Klama I�eCii. 1,781.00 1,717.00 1,532.00 480.00 250.00 70.00 760.00 600.00 3,754.00 $5,576.00 $1,781.00 $3,729.00 250.00 70.00 760.00 600.00 $3,754.00 revisian Mi�v�e4-.oNca Iran 50.00 50.00 '1�� ADDITZ� . . . . . . . . . . . . $16 � 570 . 00 : : KY'dus-Ai�eY'SQ't 00[�st. QO. P� Z� Ct�arx�e Orc]er No. 1 ��.��_ � ►� � • � �; �� Original Qoa�tsact �t. . . . . . . . . . . .$3,419,170.00 C7oa�trac't Adciit3oc�s — Ct�al�ge Oz+der No. 1.... 16, 570. 00 � 1tFpIB� �Ti'ItALT AM�Tl' $3, 435, 740.00 Sui�mitted and app�wed by Jotui G. Flora, Public War�ks Director, an the 20th day of Mardi, 1989. , �� Ja�tu't G. Flora, P. E. � Director of Public Works Approved arid avicepted this day of , 1989, by �•. ��: �� ,-.:. ..; .. 'ICnt SaC,Jcett, Ptroje[.-t Ma1'lager Approved and avoe�7ted this day of , 1989, by �44 •i• :��►iF:t'� Willi.am J. Nee, May+�r Williazn W. Burns, City Manager 6 � CiI'Y OF FRID�EEY - L'�PAF�r ' 6431 LA�JIVF�tSITY AVE., N.E. FRIDIEY, rTi 55432 Ma�h 20, 1989 Kraus-At�d�ersat� Qonst. Oo. 525 So. Eic�th St. Miru�eapolis, 1�1 55404 StTB7D(X.:T: , Gentlemen: Cha�e Ord�er No. 2. Prq�osal Requ�st No. 5 Fridley l�micipal Oenter Imp�+ovam.rYt Pro�ject No. 189 Yw are hereby ordered, authoicized, and i� to modify yaur oa�tract fa� the Fridley I�uzicipal Oenter In��ovesnerict Project No. 189 by a�ciciir�q tl�e follaairyg wt�rk: Additiar�s P.R. � � 5. R� additional Iic,�ting raagirin • v • r• H •�- �;�,•.. �:��. �• • y�• r • v• Parx voa�st. $ �oo.00 G�haxt ElectriC 8, 275. 00 '1�1lL AmITIQ� . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8, 975. 00 Original OorYtract amo�t. . . . . . . . . . . .$3,419,170.00 Coa�tract Additi�s - CYk3rrc� Order No. l. .. . 16, 570. 00 - Qzarr3e Onlet No. 2. ... 8, 975. 00 IiEVIBID QO�Ti'RACP A1rD�TP $3,444,715.00 S'tiahnitted ar�d approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, an the 20th day of Marrh, 1989. � John G. Floxa, P.E. Director of Public Works �•1�7 'a . . - . •. . •. _._ . • .- � .- . App�oved ani �ooeptsd this day of , 1989, by .•;�:�: :,..�-._.� ��,-��a 1ffi S�, Pt�DjeCt Mal�ac�et App�wed at�d aooep�ed this day of , 1989, by 0 N •�' • ��1 : Williavn J. Nee, Mayor William W. Hurns, City Manager : � � Cri'Y OF FRI�EY �PA�TP 6431 LINIVE�ITY AVE., N.E. FRID?�Y, Md 55432 Marc3i 20, 1989 i�raus-Arx3erson Oot�t. Cb. 525 So. Eic�lth St. Mintseapolis, 1rII�1 55404 StTHTDGT: Cl�ux}e Ord�er No. 3, ProQosa,l Reg�est Nos. 7, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, and 22 fa� �idley N�micipal � QerYter Ia�rvvement Project No. 189 C�entle�en: Yau are hereby orclex�ed, authorized, at�d ir�stn�ctsd to modif�i yaur �tract for ti�e Fridley l�uzicigal Deriter Inprovemerrt Project No. 189 by addirg the follawinq work: Additiaal: P. R. � ITfr � ANK7[JNr Z�O�'AL 7. Fire Station slab Jeso� $ 5,536.00 $ 5,536.00 14. Fire Statio�'1 � Kranz 997.00 Guillaw�e 600.00 1,597.00 15. Revise cloox' vpeniu'rg Kranz 1, 985. 00 Je�oo 650.00 2,635.00 16. MasonYy r�air north wall Jes�o 1,4I3.00 1,413.00 18. Wirrlow r�lao�oent in Fire Statiotl BriTi 2,100.00 2,100.00 29. Wells atxi foatir�gs - east e�l of r� G�r�ori 3, 900 . 00 3, 900 . 00 22. Flectric3l Yoam Gephalt 3,150.00 ' revisian Gler�a�e 501.00 C�lillane 40. 00 Natiac�al 285.00 3,976.00 Z�0�1'AL AmI'1'IQ�B . . . . . . . . . . . $21,157.00 I�aus-I�r�erson oo�t. o�. � � c2�ar�ge ora�er rio. 3 %�� • r• yr,- �;��:�•.. Origir�al Dorttract aottro�unt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3, 419,170. 00 QocYktact Additiod'is - Ct�arge Ordps No. 1. ... 16, 570. 00 - Criarx�e Ot�der No. 2. ... 8, 975. 00 - C�atx�e Order No. 3. ... 21,157.00 I�RIS6D � AbD�Tl' $3,465,872.00 Sulamitted arxi apprwed by J�hn G. Flora, Public Works Director, ar� the 20th day i G. Flora, P.E. irec.�tor of Public Wbrks Apprwed at�d avoepted this day of , 1989, by �•,. ��: ,.:�•.:. .. .. Z�am Sdckett, Project Manac�er Approved ar�d aoaepted this day of , 1989, by M •1' ' ��1 : W�Z�Q �/ • 17CC� 1•Yi�r William W. B�rns. Citl' Manager , 8F Engineerinq Sewer Water IParks �IStreets �Main[enanc�� MEMORANDUM �' TD: William W. Burns, City Manager �'� PW89-51 F�: Jc�hn G. Flora� Public Works Director L�iTEs Marc3z 16, 1989 S�JB�TDCT: Fridley Nhinicipal Center Project #189 - Change Order No. 6 Zb d�ate, the architec�t has doc�nertt.ed sixty-three ( 63 ) PY�poeal R�giests ar�d tw�r►ty-three (23) Work Orders for the project. As discu.ssed in the previaus memos, C�ange OYder Nos. 1 thr+o��gh 5 have prooessed 20 Prapoeal Requests. C��ange Order No. 6 consists of PropasaZ Request Nos. 17, 26, 32, 37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 46, 47, 56, 60, arxi 63 for a tatal cost of $39,826.72 ar�d Work Order Nos. 1901 to 1923 (exc:ept 1914) for a tatal ama�t of $12,309.71. Zhe Proposal Requests incoYporate the various c�ariges to the sco�e of wnrk resultiryg frcan un}mo�m circ�m�tar�oes arid vwner ar�/or architec.�t identified items neoe.ssary to satisfy the buildirg neec].s. Work O�iexs are beiryg prooes.,sed by staff to expedite the oontingenc.y w�ork r�eoe��sary to allaw for the steady progres.sion of woork as proble� occur or are identified. The r�na i n i r� pY,,�l �� ,�n9 Praoes.sed by the suboontractors : Kraus- Anderson or Boarman ar�d As�sociates. As the it�ms are defined, appropriate charx�e onders will be prepared ar�d sulxnitted for approval. R�eoamne,nd the City Cbuncil approve C��arx�e Order No. 6 inclt�ding thirteen Proposal Requests aryd tw�enty-tw� (22) Work Orders for a total amount of $52,136.43. JGF/BTi/ts Attac�nmerits 0 •, •� � � crr� oF � �zaGn�na� n�a�xr 6431 iA�1VFF�S1'1'Y AVE. , N. E. FRI�EY, Md 55432 M1rc� 20, 1989 Kraus-At�deY'soal �st. OD. 525 So. Eic,�ith St. Mirn�eapoli.s, Md 55404 SUBTF7GT: Clzatx�e Oxt�er No. 6, Pr�Qo�al R�equ�est Nos. 17, 26, 32, 34, 37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 46, 47, 56, 60, 63 ar�d ' Work Ordet' Nos. 1901 to 1922 Far' F'ridley I�micipal C�enter Imp�ov�nt Project No. 189 � Ge7rttle�en: You are hereby ordered, authorized, ar�d instn�c.�ted to modify ywr oo�tract for the Fridley I�Dunicipal Center Improve�m�nt Pro j ect No. 189 by addin� the follaair�g work: Additic�: P. R. �_ ?� AN�Tr �rAL 17. Fblioe Detention Jesca $ 3,415.00 �rea 26. 32. 34. 37. 39. 40. Fire Statioci - Radio T.V. Outlet Security lightiryg �P laevise C�tc�i Basin oave�' arrd PiP�4 c��-uyge Fire Dampexs Pblive Deten. Relocate electY'iCal P�s Add additiac�al flauresoe,nt lic�t fixtures Graryo�t�e Irocl Reai'io�ce Oar'ist. Natioa�al Sprinkler Gephart ElectriC ,; i la�e & As.soc. Gephart Electric Ge�ph�art Electric Klanm F�vir+o�-Oan, 7syc, c�phart Electric Ge�phart Electric 632.00 225.00 176.00 4,055.00 45.00 $ 8�548.00 3,570.00 3,570.00 15,220.00 15,220.00 4,877.72 4,877.72 63.00 63.00 1,460.00 1,460.00 2,580.00 2,580.00 9A : N.OUJ��r + �'��" � Cl�aryge Ord�er No. 6 -_ 43. Fblioe Dept., add telepY�oc�e, CRT & reoegtacles c�art Electric 44. Add Fire Statior� oeiling to Watc3�i Roan Mulcahy D�ywall 46. Blocking to matc3i existing aiyd r�w h,; � ainq ciYy vit systesn A.E. Carirtid (b. , 47. Fire Statiori entranoe ffiim Northw�estern NhilcahY DYywall 56. Provide c'i�or vontact ar�d signal wirir�g 1,180.00 1,180.00 100.00 100.00 550.00 185.00 200.00 550.00 385.00 mech. Door #12A Gephart Electric 275.00 275.00 60. �coercial hat Water heater KLaam Mecii. 368.00 368.00 63. Elevator sY�aft i�rk Miru�e�.,orta Flevator, Inc. 650.00 650.00 Subto�tal $39,826.72 WORR ORDE[[t I�A. 1901 Pairit back of fold� bed.s (�illawne 1902 Rock/'I�pe staixw�ell N�ulcahy Drywall 1903 Widen ea.st wall to reoeive electrical equiPm�x�t MulcahY Drywall 1904 Ctlarx� opening to reoeive �rall i�eci.s N�u].cahy DYywall 1905 �n 142 - F11r e,ast wall 1�ul.cahY DYyWall 1906 Rc�am 132 - reframe walls Mulcatiy DYywall 124.00 124.00 594.00 594.00 99.00 99.00 140.00 140.00 99.00 99.00 50.00 50.00 �r Kraus Air3eL"sal � � - Charx�e Onier No. 6 1907 Roan 138 - booc a1t rain leader 1�ulcalYY D�y�rall 1908 Create ci�.se-oo�cluit NhticahY D�y�rall 1909 Cbrt. 051�wi.der wall MulcatYy L�ywall 19Z0 Jack hat�es�S.W. pier Jes�o 19I1 Rr�om 008-raise lirYtel � at pocket cloor Jer�oo Kraus-Arrlersoaz Material 1912 Exterior Radiati� upstaixs - add re�at.e blad�ets Klanm 1913 iZoc�n 118-fur t�rdlls Mulcahy D�ywall 1914 1915 Add 12 fire da�exs �vir+oa�►-Coai 1916 R�oota 116-change spririltler head Natianal S�rinkler 2917 �p 123-fur coltmm Mulcahy DYywall 1918 Room 519-add layer of rocac ar�d fur Wall N�ulcahy Drywall 1919 North elevatiwr tucJc point crack Jesoo 1920 Scuth elevatioar� tuGlc poim piers Jesoo 1921 SGree.n wall piers- rebii.ld brick Jesoo 1922 Electrical rocsn c�aryge vyer xraus-Arxierscx� 1923 R�oam 014-supply & irLStall lauver F�viron�ori �� 87.00 633.00 150.00 360.00 87.00 633.00 150.00 360.00 528.00 34.75 562.75 240.00 240.00 142.00 142.00 2,761.00 2,761.00 n/c n/c 87.00 87.00 298.00 298.00 250.00 250.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 2,364.00 2,364.00 550.96 550.96 918.00 918.00 S�bta�ta� $12, 309.71 KYdtUS-AT1aP1T°0[1 p� F'011t Q�r�ge Oxd�er No. 6 . � 'I�lt A�DI'PI�L�B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��_ � ►� h •�• �;�-.. Origi.t�al dorYtract aa[ro�uYt . . . . . . . . . . . . . Qo�tract Additi�s - Q�arr�e Ord�et No. 1. ... - Ct�tx�e Order No. 2. . . . - C�atx3e Ot�d�er No. 3. . . . - Ci�al�c�e Oraer No. 4. . . . - Ci�rr�e Order No. 5. . . . - C�at�e O�r' No. 6. . . . •�: • _t:,� ••�. H'�� •'1� $52,136.43 $3,419,170.00 16,570.00 8,975.00 21,157.00 30,700.00 31,000.00 52,136.43 $3,579�7Q8.43 S�o.itted a�cl appraved by John G. Flora, Public Works Direc�tor, on the 20th day � � G. Flora, P.E. Director of Public Works Appraved ar�d aooepted this day of , 1:989. by r. •, � � _ �. :� •.c . .. � ._ .. T�R SdCkBtt� P1rojeC.'t N13T13qex' Approved ar�d aooepted thi.s day of , 1989, by w44 •i :�• ��_ �7� Willia� J. Nee, Mayor William W. Burns, City Manager Engineennq � Sewer Wa�er Parks Streets Main�enance MEMORQNDUM ,�� TO: William W. Burns, City Manager A!�' PW89-48 ��. FROM: John G. Flora,�lublic Works Director DATE: March 13, 1989 SIIHJECT: City Council Award of Lake Pointe Developme�t Maintenance Project No. 187 _ On Thursday, March 2, 1989, we opened bids for the Lake Pointe Development Maintenance Project No. 187. This project covers all mowing, miscellaneous cleanup, pruning and maintenance of the irrigation system of the forty-four (44) acre site. The low bidder was Greenmasters, Inc, with a bid of $34,220.00. The HRA, at its March 9 meeting, recommended the low bid be approved. Recommend that the City Council award the contract for Lake Pointe Development Maintenance Project No. 187 to Greenmasters, Inc. for $34,220.00. JGF/JT/ts Attachment 10 �, •. � � 10A BID PROPOSALB FOR LAKB POINTB DSVELOPMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT NO. 187 THIIRSDAY, MARCH 2� 1989 11:00 A.M. BID TOTAL PLANFiOLDER BOND BID COMMENTS Greenmasters, Inc. Waterford Park 505 Highway #169 N. Plymouth, NIId 55441 Talberg Lawn & Landscape 100 Wilshire Drive Minnetonka, Mn 55343 J.T. Noonan Co. 3601-48th Ave., N. Brooklyn Ctr., MN 55429 Germundsen Companies 20142 - 156th St. No. Elk River, NIId 55330 Austin P. Keller Co. 481 Front Ave. St. Paul, MN 55117 5$ $34,220.00 5$ $36,252.00 5$ $41,300.00 5$ $63,100.00 NO BID i � WW �x O `� � Q W � � : '� �i v— zY � I - Z � v O a Q � � W 3 W N � ¢ 0 r N O � _ .. N X W �� - �i_ � i f�'n�tv'-7D2[1K3�1 s� Lw ,m�w#7/H �A1rl5l! 31d1S � � . \ W z� �v+w ` ; ►- / l� I �` \� ` a> CD J \ �� / � O U i ♦\ \,i � � �e 2 � f \\� � / � � `R , OF 1.\ �^` �� I � \ � G ' 1�. ��- ` :� ' C^ ' \ _ -_��r'�� s.�-_ :1 � /l \ ,• i � �i , � ' o i h ,,\ w I I �� i _ /� I:.'":a';': P ' � ..:. ,,: � r M N � � ��1 �� t(�:i' .C. ��°' .�.:,:�� :A, � - : ;f;.; �c,: -r � � �, i:r:'�Q •;'/� � ;"�� f..!i�� _ ��\ . • �/'�r,�� - � � -, ,� ' � . � � : =�; , •. .,, �..,. . �: �� - t• • , �'� t� . ' ';;` •% � • � �� -. . � � - - � d �1 ��,� , ., �( '� '` ' � \ , • � • ' � ` � �r:�;', � ;t�Gi� � , � -� � z'.��:: . � ' l?'tI'�' � � .' ,`'.,�,.,. S�: '�` ,; �' i',, � ' *. : �� /� �; / � . •�► .. �M� . C��.` �.. / � �� .� ..� �� . , � \� � '�, - '�, � � ��-:�'' r � � � .�-�.,�; � ( � �� _., � �, . f::�_.^.. I ��-- � ,.__ _ _ ..e,,� �'+� � �� !� ��.�- - -��` � - �� a �'�� - 9 i � � • .� � -----� 1 �8 w `^ ZZ JZ �� Q Y; om �N��W J ~W aUQj ��j'Q ��V WW2Z O~� �ZZNH O ia�Wz °�Zw� �a�N�1 w � °z Engineenny Sewer Water Parks Streets Mainien�incc MEMORANDUM . TO: WiZliam W. Burns, City Manager �� PW89-49 FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director DAT$: March 13, 1989 SIIBJBCT: City Council Award of Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 10 (Sealcoat) On Wednesday, March 18, 1989, we opened bids for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 10 (Sealcoat). This project is an annual contract in the maintenance and life extension of the City's bituminous streets. The low bidder of three bids received was Allied Blacktop with a bid of $99,806.58. Allied Blacktop's unit prices were equivalent to last year's low rates. Predictions are that oil prices will rise this spring another $.02 to $.03 per square yard. The City of Columbia Heights is not prepared to advertise for bids at this time. Therefore, a delay in award would result in an increased cost. Recommend that the City Council award Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 10 (Sealcoat) to Allied Blacktop for $99,806.58. JGF/JT/ts Attachment 11 . �.. a HID PROPOSALS FOR BTREBT IMPR09EMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-10 SEALCOAT WEDNESDAY, MARCH 8, 1989 I1:00 A.M BID TOTAL PLANHOLDER BOND BID COMMENTS Allied Blacktop 10503 - 89th Avenue North Maple Grove, I�T 55369 Astec Corporation P.O. Box 1025 St. Cloud, MN 56302 Bituminous Roadways 2825 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, 1�IlJ 55407 Bituminous Paving Inc. P.O. Box 6 Ortonville, MN 56278 D. A. Davis, Inc. P.O. Box 5163 Spencer, Iowa 51301 5$ 5$ 5$ $99,806.58 $104,667.61 $112,734.89 NO BID NO BID 11A �9s�-�o sEa�.-cor►T �o,�c�r ��►-a� 11 B , �- C :, l.�.i� .•• f— f� t� oF F111�prr T -� �:'= ' �� :'` �� +�'?� C — wn, _ , ':t: V,��J�,'',�' .o�.s� Y dSTRIC7$ �- • aBfNC�s `� — � � T �z .s= ... ' '� ��. �.�� .�.� , -. `a• � _ ., �{�_._ J�[,. �-� - ti -- � .�r_�..v- —�— _ �"' L, �~ f`-1 ~I `e — -- 'r� \��' "� ' �I - - � .. _ � ! � ' _ +1 ...�. — � �, • .�� " - � �� , � -, �. � � '; C� ��ti�� i �Ir i � ,��Y �k: '� � s'I ` .�f. . j ��, +�� s�� y W ' •- �_i = r' : . . ,. �''�\ , \ � � f_� � r�� c �\ ` �/_ _ I I � (�� ! I�T— ., I i �� •1 �� L � � ^�r�� :Etti . ,I � � a. � N �' �� _ - , � �,!' �. =1�� ' - � � i� '�y?-' _ � � ��-,_'-`-�-'- ,!� � — ; � � -• �i-.�.�`/J ' - I ' ' - d� . wJ(".� = E � �� .� �I � --� _-� .. � $ '' I��//�. � ? � 4 �' i 4I .��°.-r�' ��j � - ; : .� ' I � ��,��,�;� �: _�. -- i _ � I y 11� 11 �� .� �,yT\�' ��,�',' % �� .''`/` �,('"�'�ni.j' �.;��. Mk !.1 � c^� \ � vl O ' ��' JM \�� ) : � N �� - 'I� � � � � I 'F�r 'L— i � �C � � - I ; ,�� i� - ' _'� � � _ , ��_ � ��'�. -� � -- `'; �^.,, ,�i � �'�� ^ �J = �� r-:. � � � 1ii +^� _ - ,r� � I . z Lr ,� � ,i�= �. -�.r� � �----�'�--f � i � i i ` ` � - ' � ,� - 1 Y 1_ ;�� 1 ! I ��i �!�� } I 1 vJ,� i(-"-, r � '''� 1� --- j � = � c = - �. �-`," � I� I I � A:� � �� y�� /.� ��..:� LJ�� c� � � R� .i✓ �1/� � ��+ - i: _- ;��, I� � _ �ooR� S - _ � r}� WIT�,� I` I` .% � o- \a/� --- 1lLEL" � 1 •, � �� ( t � / .! �a,- � =a � „�, � , �°;�`{� '.�ti > ,/� �^ . � I / � I 'I 1�`�° }�� 'V T�:� I' +I ` ,I I 11 - � i� � • �n\ � °L� ---- �� c_ M i _ - ,,��jl ji n � / � ` J - ^ �.._� _ � � ' I W �� // y'\ - j L�� i� r�` - . � I � ` � � 1 � _ � � i /� '� �_ 1 i�J 'f. :I.� ` _ � � �� , ; - - .� �,� G��',�� - ; � � - �� . r -- � � ! V fi�____ L =_ I- y .... j I � ;�� E t - _ _..- _ __. ___ ; .._..�. _ .... � ;�,� \ ..__ � _'�,,, . � � - ` :;_ ? `�_ '^ -• = j ._. _=�a � 5 Q �.. � _ _ �, �, � �ti_ � : _= =t _ _:. r� =�� i� a.. � - =i =_ I ��T�\` '.�I�Wii =37• � �..��T: ...� � a SSS R `� � $ ��a — = �z�.��i _ �: � __�_° =� , = _- _� �- = _ �._- —.r..— �;, � _ ` � =R: _ =i`'- � � ! _:_:' � _- � . � � � _ - ^- _ � z __. __ _s -� -_• � =z. �:. - ;. _ �s s \ Yj,�� _ ��' � �T:' .�.� � TL. �� .�ae� r � �i.� � -- .�.S�L:. �Y� a �L. , @ �""i�<< i _ 4 _.., _� �z:'-` _=��= �_. �- _ti' �•_ _ ''t� . �, -L. � Z=. v —�' �. �~-� — = �.J �i� ,./ � �__ ��. �� • tl ��3.. L � J � � � .�� S � T ' C'J ' � � � � f`� M: . � ' � �� .� ��i - Z ...... '��1 if � / , � _ �i` ' � - � ��_ � � y •• a�'• _ ��, C •^, � `� • �j �T' � : �7 # � _ ,�c� __ 'T� ^! r_. = ?s�s a ' ., �..—._ :' ` =i ~ _ T�r � .. b�. .�. �w�s� 1 '^'-�� ' - - STREET MAP-CITY OF �� = FRIDLEY £-�=� _ �.. �. � �I �- - �_ f � 1 • = a.�_ w...�� wr _ �-• � Sz p L .•. __� _��- � 7 Eng�neenn�� Sewer Water Parks 'IStreets 'IMaintenani� MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager •��• PW89-47 � FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director DAT$: March 13, 1989 BIIBJECT: City Council Award of 1989 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Project On Thursday, March 9, 1989, we opened bids for our 1989 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Project. This project is an annual contract and is part of Fridley's overall repair and replacement maintenance needs. We received seven (7) bids this year with Gunderson Brothers, the 1987 contract awardee, low bidder of $35,295.00. Recommend that the City Council award the contract for the 1989 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk project to Gunderson Brothers for $35,295.00. JGF/JT/ts Attachment 12 •, •. � � BID PROPOSALS FOR 1989 KISCELLANEOIIS CIIRB, GIITTER i SIDEWALR PROJECT THURSDAY, MARCH 9, 1989 1I:00 A.M BID TOTAL PLANHOLDER BOND BID COMMENTS Gunderson Brothers 2325 Snelling Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55404 Standard Sidewalk 3346 Washington Avenue No Minneapolis, MN 55412 Lindahl & Carlson, Inc. 1821 University Ave., #245 St. Paul, MN 55104 Halvorson Construction 4227 - 165th Avenue N.E. Anoka, MN 55304 Adcon Inc. 16191 Round Lake Boulevard Andover, MN 55304 HRS Construction 18140 Fenway Avenue North Farest Lake, MN 55025 Ron Graves Contractinq 10400 Bass Lake Road Plymouth, MN Victor Carlson & Sons 6420 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Curb-Masters Inc. 4690 Penkwe Way Eagan, l�i 55122 Gustafson & Goudge Box 28 Clearbrook, I�I 56634 5$ �$ 35,295.00 5$ �$ 35,380.00 5$ �$ 35,395.00 5$ �$ 36,378.00 5$ �$ 56,500.00 5$ �$ 57,840.00 5$ �$108,435.00 NO BID NO BID NO BID 12A PAaB 2 HZD PROPOSALS FOR 1989 MIBCELLANEOIIB CIIRB, GOTT$R i SIDEWALR PROJECT TI�iURS DAY , MARCH 9, 19 8 9 PLANHOLDER Austin P. Keller Co. 481 Front Avenue St. Paul, MN 55117 New Look Landscaping 3386- 50th Avenue Becker, MN 55308 Swanston Equipment P.O. Box 1963 Fargo, ND 58107 BID BOND 11:00 A.M TOTAL BID NO BID NO BID NO BID r. COMMENTS 12B Engineern-��, Sewer Water Parks SRee�s Maintenanc�_ MEMORANDUM ,��' TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �;'� PW89-54 FROM: John G. Flora, �Public Works Director DATE: March 16, 1989 SIIBJECT: MVET Fund Transfer The 1989 Legislature is considerinq a bill to transfer the existinq Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) from the Highway User Distribution Fund which includes the cities and counties to a Highway Transportation Study Fund which predominately supports the LRT. The 1987 Legislature increased the MVET transfer from the General Fund to 30 percent being split, 25 percent to transit and 75 percent to Highway User tax distribution. It has been the position of the municipalities that 100 percent of the MVET be transferred from the General Fund to the Highway User Fund. Current Legislation calls for the elimination of the MVET Highway User Fund and that portion to be transferred directly to MnDOT for state trunk highways thereby cutting out the distribution funds to the counties and cities. I have prepared a resolution for the City Council's consideration which requests 100 percent of MVET funds to be provided to the Highway User Distribution Fund and that the sunset clause be eliminated so that revenues will continue to be distributed to the cities and counties. Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution. JGF/ts Attachment cc: Rick Pribyl 13 � �._� �, IYE80I�TPI�T iD. - 1989 1�80LUPI�i 8[JPP�O�R"II� l�riln[t VS�CyS E�DCI�tS TAX (MVEP) F�A�II�i I�i STRF.L�'P �AS, the City of Fridley, Mi�so�ta r�presents a papulatioaz of 30,228; and �,8, the citizens are particutarly aware of the transportatioai need.s of the cities and oamties in the State of Miru�eso�ta; ar�d �AB, the street ar�ci hic�way system is deteriorating at a rate faster than the fin�ncial ability to maintain arid rebu.ilt it; arid �AB, transportatioaz fvnding is a hic� priority issue of 1989; and �,8, it is apprapriate to use road user funds for major street arxi road oonstzucti� rather than usin4 P�Y �; and �S, city gaverm�t hic�w-ay ar�d street plans are predicated � proceec�s fraa the Mator Vehicle �ccise Tax (MVEr) and with ariy reductioaz of these furids, many city plans will be cut back or riot oaapleted. �, th+e peroent of local participatiori in the oon.stnictioal and reoonstnu.�tioai of state-awned hiyhw�ays is ir�creasir�g. 1�7i1, �, B� IT REB�L�, by the City Cau�cil of the City of Fridley that the 1989 sessioc► of the L�gislature prwide for the transfer of 100 peroent of the MV.E.T to the Y�oad user fvnd to prwide a stable sa�oe of adeg�ate fundir�g for the oonstnx.�tioai and maisit�en�.� of streets arid hiyhw�ays in the state. � IT F� ltE90LVV� that the "�" provisiaal included in the 1988 Transportati� Ftur3ir�g Bill be rezroved so that MVEr revernie can vontinue to go to the Hic�way User Tax Distri.butioa�t FLmd so that it can be u_sed for city streets and va�ty rnacis in the State of Minnesata. P�SS�ED AI�ID ADOPl'ED BY '1'� CI'IR �� CITY OI+ FRIDLEY ZHIS 2018 L1�iY �' MAIbCS� 1989. WILLSAM J. N� - 1�YOR ATI�:ST: ^� ��• �. . .. w « �• 13A¢ E�,g��,�:F��:; s�,«,,, w.,�r•� F��,�w, s�r��•�s I`Ma�nten,��- MEMORQNDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager PW89-18 FROM: John G. Flora; Public Works Director DATE: January 26, 1989 SIIBJECT: 1989 Department of Health Legislation As I have previously mentioned, the Department of Health is sponsoring a Bill for the 1989 Legislature for funding of public water supply monitorinq. The Department is proposing to add fifteen (15) new positions to their organization and support the municipalities with laboratory services for the various water analysis that are being prescribed by the EPA and the State Department of Health. The proposal before the Legislature is to require an annual fee of $3.20 for each water service connection in the City to be collected by the City and submitted to their offices to fund their activities. In Fridley's case, this would be in excess of $30,000 per year. Currently, our water analysis are in the area of around $1,000 and based upon their own figures they anticipate that water analysis costs for municipalities would amount to $3,500 which is substantially less than the fees collected. Up until a few years ago, the Department of Health was accomplishing water analysis for the cities. In 1986, they sent a letter out sayinq they were no longer able to accomplish this work and directed the cities to continue the analysis and to fund the work. Therefore, based upon this past experience, there is no guarantee that even if this Leqislation is passed that the Department will continue to permanently provide laboratory services to the municipalities. Accordingly, based upon the past experience and the charges that are anticipated, it does not appear economical for the cities to support this legislation. I would, therefore, suggest that the Council contact the State Legislators or, if they deem appropriate, I can prepare a resolution to also submit to the State so that they can receive our comments prior to any formal action on the Bill. JGF/ts Attachments 14 �� l 1i� �S � minnesota department of heaith 717 a.e. delawaro s� p.o. box 9441 minneapolis 554�0 (612) 623•5000 DATE TO MEMORl1NDUM : January 20� 1989 : City Council/Town Board/Rural Nater Supply/System Operator FROM : Gary L. Englund, P.E.� Chief �� Section of Water Supply and Engineering SUBJECT: Report to the 1989 Legislature, Proposals for Alternative Funding for Water Suaulv Monitorino and Surveillance in Minnesota By way of this notice, the Minnesota Oepartment of Health �MDH) wants to alert you to proposals that will be considered by the 1989 Legislature on funding for public water supply monitoring. As the owner and/or oaerator of a aub- Leaislature's deliberations in this �atter. The following is a brief sum- mary of the report including the costs that will be incurred b public water supplies as a result of the 1986 Safe Orinking Water Act (SDWA� amendments and the funding alternatives submitted to the Legislature by MDH to cover these costs. As the state agency responsible for protecting and monitoring public drinking water suppiies in Minnesota, the MDH submitted a request to the 1988 legisla- ture for support of a significantly expanded program, which included funding for 1 ew ositi s and supqort for lab�r_ r servic . The funding request was ased on 1 the need to provide greatly expan ed monitoring of public water supplies due to �he concern for the occurrence of many man-made chemi- cals in drinking water and 2) the federal 1986 SDWA amendments that require public water supplies to greatly expand the monitoring performed on their drinking water. The 1988 Legislature directed the MDH to report back to it prior to the 1989 session with proposals for funding the drinking water pro- gram in the future. Backaround There are 12,000 public water supply systems in Minnesota divided into three categories: comaunity (1�000)� nontransient noncommunity (1,665), and noncom- munity (9,305) systems. The nonconmunity systems require minimal testing. However, community (such as yours) and nontransient nonconmunity systems will be required to test for 83 contaminants compared to the 22 presently monitored. MDH has estimated that the ann a e cost to each community and nontransient noncorm�nity water sys em will be , with some systems incurring annual costs of � �to S3 �500 because o t e ighly variable monitor- ing frequencies. To fully fund the l�f�H drinking water program� iacluding the an equal opportunity employer 14A 14B City Council/Town Board/ -2- January 20. 1989 Rural Water Supply/System Operator cost of all required water analyses, requires approximately S3 million per year. The funding options for the drinking water program contained in the report are as follows: � 1. 6enerai Furtd. Every taxpayer contributes to this fund and most state programs use this as their source of funding� therefore there is consider- able competition for these funds. The Commissioner's Drinking Water Task Force recommended that the program be supported by general fund appropriation. 2. Revenue-Generating Options. a. Cost-of-Service Fee for Water Testing and Inspection for Each Public Nater Supply. Cost per person per year ranges from s33.20 (small ,systems) to �.002 (very large systems). b�. Service Connection Fee for Each Customer Connected to a Conmunity Water Supply. Annual fee of s3.20 per water service connection would generate sufficient revenue to support the program. c. Fee Based on the Quantity of Nater Used by Each Customer of a Comnu- nity Water Supply. A fee of s.021 per 1,000 gallons of water used would generate sufficient revenue. d. Operatin Fee. Annual fee based on a sliding scale: nonconmunity - systems �100 or s200 and community systems s2�300 (less than 100 persons served) to �4�200 (greater than 100,000 persons served). e. Combination of One or More of the Above. MDH, in its report, is recomnending the annual service connection fee as the preferred funding alternative� because it is reasonably equitable� easy to administer and assures a stable funding source. A bill imposing this fee will be submitted as part of the Governor's legislative package. It is important to note that both federal and state rules place the responsi- bility of water quality monitoring on the individual water systems. Thus, associ- The Legislature will be discussing water supply funding during the current session. Since every public water supply system in the state is affected, we �ould encoura e ou to contact our state le islators and let your feelings be known on the funding a erna ives ing cons� ere . If you would like to receive a copy of the complete report, please contact eie at 612/623-5330 or Dick Ciark at 612/623-5227. 6LE:RDC:ter RESOLIITION NO. - 1989 RESOLIITION OPPOSINCi THE T$STING SIIRCHARGBS PROPOSBD BY THE MINNSSOTA DLPARTMENT OF HEALTH WBEREAB, the Minnesota Department of Health has proposed to the State Legislature that funding for testing public water supply systems be transferred from the general fund to a surcharge against each water connection of each municipal system; and WHEREAB, this proposal appears to be grossly unfair to the City as compared to the actual costs involved; and WBEREAB, the City's policy is for utility funds to be based on a user fee concept; and WHEREAB, the City Council of the City of Fridley is aware of and agrees with the needs for increased testing of municipal water systems as required by the Environmental Protection Agency; and i�HEREAB, the City Council is aware of the Legislature's desire to consider alternatives to the current practice of funding these testing costs from the general fund; and NHEREAB, the City Council is aware that some of the funding alternatives are significantly more costly to the City than others. The funding scheme proposed by the Department of Health may be as much as six times more expensive than the actual costs of the testing for the City. NOW, TBEREFORE, BB IT RESOLVBD BY THE CITY COONCIL OF THB CITY OF FRIDLBY THAT the City supports either a continuation of funding through the general fund or a fundinq scheme that assesses the actual cost of the testing to each municipal system being tested; and BB IT FIIRTBBR RESOLVBD TBAT the City strongly discourages any funding scheme that has a tendency to subsidize certain municipal systems at the expense of others. PASSED AND ADOPTBD BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 20TH DAY OF MARCB, 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 14C Engineenn , Sewer Water Parks S[reets Maintenance MEMORANDUM ,� �' TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�;"� PW89-50 FROM: John G. Flora,�lic Works Director DATSZ SUHJ$CT: March 14, 1989 No Parking Requirement on University Avenue West Service Road North of 83rd Avenue The above-mentioned street is an MSAS scheduled for improvement under our Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 2. The State will not approve our plans until we submit a resolution authorizing the postinq of "No Parking" on the service road just north of 83rd Avenue in the area of the turning lane. (See attached map). The proposed width of 45 feet is not adequate and does not meet State minimum requirements to allow parking on either side of the street. I recommend resolla ' n at JGF/C /ts Attachments the Council approve the attached "No Parking" their March 20 meeting. 15 ,� �� .. . � � Q � ��` . . �: � t�- � .- � - � I.:.: . :�;. , � , '� , � L� :_ . - _ ._ :_ � F�- - s � . - �� .- . � M _ ,�'� . _ ..� �00 ' Z N� -' .- ��. �v;W � _ � � � N r,� , , ` � � i . JO. � - , � ��: ; . ;� .� i � f � . . . �; ' Yv •'` '�ni}�r . . li . t � . . .. 'Y ' � � . `. ,. i. r � . . . . . �.y. - Yi Y . . �. �.` � � - �•' . . � .. { Q . � . . '. , � �s � . 'x � -� . . � a , x " . ?'. �: " _ - ; . � � � • • � � • °� � - .. � � � � ,� � � , j � � � 1 . t �. . '�' • � ~ � \ ' _ •';'. �;� ' i 2 ' � �tiNy�� , '. , • � �� w � j ��. � �r � ` _ . o,s � Q � , , t �� ,� � . t� t3 � � • � �w�l� ►� 4ac1-S� � • � � ,� . � � Z � � � � � -- �' "_ Z, � r . . � �� . � � .2 }� • ,., ,� . � �, N - a � � �� .�- � � � JO W I o� t�► ,00 � �; . � c� � � • 1` r m N . Q � ' � . — � — . J --- — w , ' � t � � I ' � I � ` ' i • v -- .� w �' r:Teti.1�::.��t i�Ci.�v:��-i':�.: :��• . � 0 � �� i w E'- .■ �• sj_ •�� . �� . ---: � _ �, � � � i �� + � � � .. � 1�Ti�- TTT "_�� i�; - * T�' "� ._a , � RESOLtJTION ZtO. - 1989 RESOLIITION AIITHORISINO T88 P08TIN(3 OF "NO PARRING�� SIGNB ON BOTH SIDEB OF IINIVERSITY AVENIIB WBBT SERVICB ROAD (M.S.A.S. 341) IN TH$ ARElI OF T8E TIIRNINa LAI�18 IMMEDIATBLY NORTH OF 83RD AVENIIB WBEREAB, the above-mentioned service road has been designated a Municipal State Aid Street (M.S.A.S.) and will be constructed in 1989 to a 45-foot width in the above-referenced area; and WHEREAB, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOTj requires that no parking be permitted on a 45-foot wide State Aid Street with three traffic lanes as parking will impede the traffic flow. NOW, THEREFORE, HB IT RESOLVED, by the City CounCil of the City of Fridley that the City is hereby authorized to post "No Parking�� signs on both sides of University Avenue West Service Road in the area of the turninq lane immediately north of 83rd Avenue upon completion of the Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 2. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF TH$ CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 20TH DAY OF MARCH� 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 15B 12880LptZ�I iU. - 1989 •�:r:• 1 • � �•�: � c •� � � � • •1: •�:�I- � I:� t�:4"I� f: � �:1= M •I" " Y�� 1� I I'r_ • V� B8 IT �OLV� by the City Camcil of the City of Fridley as follaws: A. ZY�at oaagnencir�q May, 1989, be driven or jurisdictiaai PursuarYt to ChaP�ter � tt�e 20th day of tu�less sooa�er aPexated t�pc�at of the City where 503, City Marc3i, 1989 t�et�u.r�ated or �Y � the wieic�t Cbde of Fridley, Minneso�ta, 1978 that , and oontiriuirig until the 22nd day of th�reafter oo�ntinued, no vehicle shall or public hic�ray in the City uryde.r of � vehicle exveeds: 4 '1�1 PER A7Q,S B. Ttbe abwe restrictiori shall not apply with respect to the follawir�g named streets or public hic�ways, to-wit: �7l�-i � Ashtarl AVexiue Ashtan Avernye Able Street Alley East of Beedi Street Arthux' Street Baker Street Beecii Street Berne Rr.x�d Bridgewater Drive Brookview Drive Carrie Lane Cheri Iane da�neroe Circle Fast �roe Circle South Oonmeroe Circle West Do�tt[►ex�oe Is1ne Fast Danube Roitd East Moore Iak,e Drive East River Rd. SeYV. Dr. F.ast River Rd. Serv. Dr. F.1m Street Fireside Drive Gardena Avent�e Glacier Iane Hillwirxi Rr�ad Hic�tAZy Straet Industxial Boutevard Ir�dustrial Baulevard Jacksoai Street Lake Fbintre Drive Main Street Main Street Matterhorn Circle Mo�llL�oe Street Mo E�+'=•-r: 52nd Avexnye 79th Aventye west M�re Lake Dr 78th Ave.rnle North Danube Road 73rd Avesnye 77th Avenue Wind�ere Drive �tire Lerr�th ] CC; ��ippi Street QuiTx;Y Street 53rd Avem�e 73rd Avernie Cananer+oe Circle Oo[Raeroe Circle 73rd Aveta�e Matterhorn Drive T.H. #65 51st Way 57th Avern�e 77th Ave�ue T.H. #65 Central Avesnle Mattarhorn Drive Matterhorn Drive 81st Averatie 53rd Way 51st Way Carrie I�ne 7th Street OsUorne �d 57th Avernie Matterhprn Drive 63rd Avesnie ive E,ast Sautlz � I�UStY'ldl BZVCl. Iror►ton Street Mississippi Street 79th Avernie 400 feet north Osborne R�oad 81st Avenue Fast F�d 67th Avenu�e Jackson Street Fillmore Street Oaarnneroe Circle Ca�rm�ex�ce Circle 73rd Avenue Osborne Road Arthttr' Street Central Ave.nue 51st Way to I-694 57th Avenue 79th Avenue Centtal Avesnle East City Limits St. Moritz Drive Central Avernie 600 feet north 500 feet noYth 53rc1 Way 58th Avernie west Moore Iak�e 83rd Averrue 61st Avernie East 67th Avernie � Drive W �� . � � .j�� - 1989 1`IVL 1.11 LXLL 14RJC l�L�i North IrmsbnicJc Drive Osl�orne i�d Osborne Way Qulllc.,y StY'ee�t Rainex' Pass Ranc�ers R�oad Ranchers R�oad Rioe Creek Raad St. Imier Drive St. Moritz Drive Trollhagen Drive Viron �bDad West DarYUbe Road W�est Moore Iake Drive Windemere Drive 3rd Street 5th Street 7th Street T.H. #47 E. Sezv. Dr. T.H. #47 E. Serv. Dr. T.H. #47 E. Setv. Dr. T.H. #47 W. Serv. Dr. T.H. #47 W. Se�rv. Dr. T.H. #47 W. Se,rv. Dr. T.H. #47 W. Serv. Dr. 51st Way 53rci Avern�e 53rd Avenue 57th Avenu�e 57th Avenue 58th Avenue 61st Avern�e 63rd Ave,rnie 63rd Ave.inie T.H. #65 E. SeYV. D�. T.H. #65 E. Serv. DY'. T.H. #65 W. Se.rv. Dr. 69th Avenu�e 71st Avem�e 72r�d AvexYUe 73rd Averiue 77th Avernle ?8th Avent�e 79th Avern�e 81st Avenue 83rci Avern�e 75th Way 7�_s �_.4 �{r lAl1�iR.7C � MatteYi�orn Drive - W. Burli�t.aci No. East River Roxi 57th Avernye Glacier Tar� 77th Aver�e 79th Avent�e Qentral Averale Herne Road Trol]hagen Drive MatteYiLOm Drive OsUorne Ro�ci North Darn�be R�oad T.H. #65 (N.Moore Trollhagen Drive 49th Aveiwe Mississippi Street 53rd Av�na�e 53zt1 Avert�e 57th Avernye 69th Avp.ntie 73rd Avexaye 81st Averaye Mississippi Street Mississippi Streei E. River RAa�d Main Street CQntral Avetn�e T.H. #47 7th StL�e�t Jaaksoal Street Starlite Blvd. 7th Street T.H. #47 63rd Avera�e Osl�orne Rr.x�d 731�d Aver�e Centxal Ave,ra�e T.H. #47 T.H. #65 Central Aver�e Fast River Rr�,�d E. Burlingtan No. E. Burlirr�t:on No. Fiic,Jr�ory Street Main Stre�t Osl�orne Ibo�d 0 TakP) R� � s' L'!LU■�.. � E�t C�ty �ltl.� East River Road 75th Way c�zrie Iane Sauth city Limits 79th Avenue 81st Avemie West Mpore I�ke Dr. Sauth City I�nits Sarth City Limits St. Imier Drive Fireside Drive Scxith Cvl-�le-sac T.H. #65 (S.Moore Lak�e) South City Limits 53�1 Avernie 64th Avernie 67th Avernie N. Approx. 500' Mississippi Street 73�1 Avenue 81st Avenue 83rd Avernle Rioe C're�k Z�erraoe ' S. AppLrox. 800' Ir�dustrial Blvd. Central Avernie E. Ap�rwc. 300' 7th Street Qui.rx,,y Street West Moore Lake Drive West Moore Iak,e Drive Nlpnroe Street 7th Street South b'rd 5auth 800' Sa�uth F� 1d East City Limits City Garage Central Avenwe Ca�ne,roe I�ne Rar�chers Rpad Main Street T.H. #47 T.H. #47 T.H. #47 Alden Way 16A R�esoluti� No. - 1989 � � ar�d the w�eic�t liiait with re.spec,-t to s1x� streets ar�d hic�rays is: 9 't�i Pffit A7Q8 C. Natice of these restrictior�s s�hall be published ar�d posted with respect to eacn of su�cn streets arya nic�ways ar,a wi�en so publi.srvpa arya postea, ttt�ee restrictions shall be in fvll foroe and effect; all as provided thereof, wxler Chapter 503, City ood�e of Fridley, �Lir�eso�ta, 1978. D. A vehicle in exoess of such limits may be aperated or driven upon a street or publish highway in the City withaut violati� of law when the same is done under S�ecial P�ermit thereof is.s��ed in aocon�ance with the provisiar�s of Mvu�esata Statutes Sec. 169.87 which are adapted arid made a part hereof by referenoe the same as if fully ir�oorporated herein. E. That sctyool bus c�erators are given speci.al permit to pYtioeed with norn�al aperatiori ori their regularly establist�ed rart.es ar�d at reg�larly established hour�, said permits to be is.sued by the Public Works Director. PASS�ED At�ID ADOP'l� BY � QTY QO[A�IC� �� CITY OF' FitIDLEY Z�IIS 20T8 DAY OF I�RL'8� 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR AZ'I'F�T: SE�2IEY A. HAAPAIA� CIZ'Y CIEE2K 16B ___ __ . , . , 16C� -� �N=;." , - C �� a fR� �- � —I ;� ; °'" wr.�o sa+oa� �'..;.;�;., . C .�.a� :�;:�;:;,,,';� =_— ,..y o�wc�s __� nsrwcrs .,`'/ ',.��^ �l>'� ` L 'J� C Y �_' ` JI �' _� �' tla fL a� _ �� - �' `� =- . . J� - � -' .�� z ' \� � ° _'= - - . � � , _ ; - .... \ ,'�,c \��:Ii _ � � ,- � � j �� ' -- n� � . - . ; , � _.... ,,, , . \ _ . , , , � -� -,r . :1� •. � • � { . � _ ��,� � \ ^' y' --_ ' _ ^ � � -' ^ II��n � _. i � r- i \ ` _ T� r---� �� , _ ,�-- _ �� ;,,, . ��' ��('�I� €, � � _� ;-� I i � ��;� �� 1 .�— =� ,, ��r � r—�. � � � � � . I�II�',f�� _rEl��. _ W _ E '' � (Q� F, + -- � 'j -- ' j .•-� . ��. S ' �I��--,/`� j�i�^� �-I >,� � �'�: �� _ �r:� � � _ �� '�°f� •�, - il - � I � - , � � ,: .� ,.� _..r,.;. a !� a � ❑ � o� � ` /j i �� '��.,-� ' � � � �' jV (�.,� I � 4 ' � `�.��,1 - � �, � '- ,I �� _ � f �� I _.. � -- -_��v� � _-� � Y � ',�a �� ,�, �� , �� ,�__ - - , � � � I�, � ;� . i I, • -- ��' ' ;�I��► ' � _ � streets upon ' �I � '�' , �;�. � -��" I` �; i _ � which vehicles •_�� '� �V . ! j • ��, = I �� ,:, ,'_;�,� - - ��r ' with 9 tons per `;:�� I � :' �- � axle loads are ;:�c" I ''�, . '�;�;�' �; _ � �•�` ; .�� atlowed. .,�� - � ' - T = -- ,.� s �, � � II �� LJ�4 _ -- ro i` - _ � 1. � • / o-� a� ��' �� t� , .� � ;� _ , , n�,�1- _�;�' �' I��;� ', ' .�;I � �, -- ' - ' ��, ��> I � � �� `. �14�, 11 ^ ' . " � / - �r- ,. : j ; y — ;� �1 I � ' , _ ' _ �r� �� / �''� -- � � L ' � � ~ ' �� , ,, .;� , �.� ; , � �,' - � � � .,.. = —z .,. . if _;�� ; I � - ; �, � - __: � _ _ • -� —.. ___ .._.�. ..o ° ��, � _�: �� __;-_: _ � � � �::- �� . ,�, 1 - _ :,--� - _ _�= -� � _:��: ��'- - � � `.._ � �_ �t.-' ' � S' `` _-- -a � _ � "� � � � ~ � � �'�l� ' _ __.-;•_� , �.� � \� ��,�- 'I) =_s• a s�a y _; .._� ece „ ' � J, � j� , I 3i' _ ' ':s - ', s=e `_ � g ??T�` -- � - ,W��' _':. x _ L. ..� ==az a , °�� ° s 8 'n `�� ' L:L'Eli�l - _ _ _x � _ ' . ° i _? '' � a N C�L�a 7 ��• ..0 �� .��. �s�'l�� w + ~� '� � i" �s' �G �L .3 : .�� —~ •— � '�\ � r � , . f .�." �� S�} r 3i � '� �- r / _ ' � - �i.�y G4S r.r�. �I. �a •• � s \ L�' I ' ��. TT: .. �! P.1L?� +3 �'t� � s�v-'.•3 �t: a�. I�. �I - .� :• � asns. a s� a � �v. m ; -_: � .—s: a S _; N �j y��"��'� „ : s:a•--- _ :- � _ ==°3 ' � =1. � �� ? �'i[�� ' �Y. ar_s• � =:•-yn �_' � t �_r __ �� u ^_ � �� , ' I �^ mrt = '� i a �aT....� __-� f ` e�? � ° ��a� 4 iD -�f I -- o:- __• .. � -' r- � � 1 A: I � �:i .,. 7'..� �t2 ��= �'• L�7' y� 5 / � ��, � = - ., � S _ '�7 3 �..0 .. ��'� 'J »I �L'i' :�i�' =T 7 3=�•^^a i•= � / 'nCI. ;�;__� ,� pG! ^O ��'.LYa�P. � � _ �f:��'1 — .,�TREET MAP—CITY OF =__��°s�g / . .� - FRIDLEY �� =• = ' � / • f �+ '� .�.. �.....�... �.� � ' _ �$� 8 � _�_ --�--�-- _ r+: . ,. .. � I 17 RESOLUTION NO. - 1989 RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF CHILDREN'S AGENDA WHEREAS, children are our most precious resource and deserve to � be our most urgent priority; and WHEREAS, social and economic changes, including the increase in mothers working out of financial necessity, and the number of children living in poverty, have created a crisis in the aare of our children; and WHEREAS, this crisis has been compounded by the lack of affordable, quality day care, lack of health insurance and lack of family support services; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has a stake in seeing that our children receive the care they need, and become productive and contributing members of our community; and WHEREAS, the Children's Agenda as proposed by the Perpich-Johnson administration is an important first step in Minnesota's response to the crisis in our families; and WHEREAS, the Children's Agenda includes increased funding for child care, for Head Start, for Early Childhood Family Education, for physical and mental health services for children, for family and parenting education and for drop-out prevention; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THIS COUNCIL URGES THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE TO SUPPORT AND VOTE FOR PASSAGE OF THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA, AND FURTHER, THAT A COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION BE FORWARDED TO MEMBERS OF OUR LOCAL LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION AND TO THE OFFICES OF GOVERNOR RUDY PERPICH AND LT. GOVERNOR MARLENE JOHNSON. • PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPLA - CITY CLERK CITY OF FRIDLBY CHARTER COMMISSION MEBTINt3, JANUARY 30, 1989 �____�----------------------------------------------------------- CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Hendley called the January Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL• 30, 1989, Charter Members Present: Margaret Hendley, Bruce Nelson, Donald Betzold, Diane Savage, Walt Starwalt, Ralph Stouffer, Francis van Dan, Orville Carlson, Members Absent: Others Present: Ed Hamernik, Geraldine Schei, Robert Minton, LeRoy Oquist, Gregg Hebeisen, Donald Mittelstadt Bill Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager Donna Bondow, 6616 Central Avenue N.E. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 28 1988 CHARTER COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Stouffer, seconded by Ms. Savage, to approve the November 28, 1988, Charter Commission minutes with the following amendment: Page 1, in the motion to approve the Charter Commission minutes, change "Planning Commission" to "Charter Commission". UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON HENDLEY DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE MINUTES APPROVED AS AMENDED. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION by Mr. Starwalt, seconded by Mr. Stouffer, to approve the agenda as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON HENOLEY DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. CONSIDERATION OF TERMS OF OFFICE OF MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS: Mr. Hunt stated the City Council had the first and second reading on the ordinance on January 9 and January 23, 1989. There is now a 60 day period during which a petition could be put together to r -1- 18 18A CHARTER COMMI83ION MEETIN(i, JANIIARY 30, 1989 overrule the ordinance. If there is no petition within this 60 day period, then in 90 days it will become part of the Charter. 2. CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 4 07. NOMINATING PETITIONS (FORMAT): Mr. Hunt stated staff felt there was some problem in Section 4.06 about the length of time or window for filing which was in conflict with State Law. Another issue raised by Shirley Haapala, City Clerk, was the Nomination Petition (sample included in the agenda) . Upon first reading this, staff thought it might require some change in the Charter. Mr. Hunt stated the Commission recommended this be forwarded to the Charter Commission attorney for an opinion. However, after Zooking at this more closely, staff reali2ed there really was no difference. Nothing that is required by the Charter is contradicted by State Law. The only difference between the Nomination Petition which is distributed when people come in to nominate someone for City Council and what is required by the Charter is that they add the following sentence to the Nomination Petition: "I wish my name to appear on the ballot exactly as follows:" In addition, they are required by the State to file an "Affidavit of Candidate and Receipt for Filing". Again, this is over and above what is in the Charter, but does not contradict the Charter. Mr. Hunt stated Section 4.07 says, "The form of the nomination petition shall be substantially as follows:" For that reason, it is staff's opinion that they really do not have a conflict with State Law, and that unless the Charter Commission for other reasons decides to recommend a change to Section 4.07, staff is formally withdrawing their original request. � Mr. Stouffer stated that as long as there is no contradiction between the State Law and the Charter and as long as staff sees no conflict and is withdrawing their request, he did not think any formal motion was needed by the Commission. 3. CONSIDERATION OF FORWARDING AMENDMENT OF SECTION 4.06. NOMINATIONS BY PETITION, TO THE CITY COUNCIL: Mr. Hunt stated that at the November meeting, the Commission made a motion to hold Section 4.06 until they had finished discussions and made a motion to the Council on Section 4.07. Since no further action was going to be taken on Section 4.07, it was appropriate to make a motion forwarding Section 4.06 to the City Council. MoTION by Mr. Stouffer, seconded by Mr. Starwalt, to forward the -2- 18B CHARTER COMMISSION MEETIN(3, JANIIARY 30, 1989 amendment to Section 4.06, Nominations by Petition, to the City Council. UPON A VOICE DOTE, ALL VOTING AY$, CHAIRPERSON HENDLBY DECLAR$D THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. 4. CONSIDERATION OF STATUS OF UNEXPIRED TERMS OF OFFICE: Mr. Hunt stated the Commission members had a copy of a letter he had written to Mr. Terpstra dated January 20, 1989, in which he asked for an opinion from Mr. Terpstra on whether service of an unexpired term on the Charter Commission is equivalent to service of a full term for purposes of reappointment under Minnesota Statutes 410.05, Subd. 2. . Mr. Hunt stated he had not yet received a response back from Mr. Terpstra; however, he did ask Mr. Terpstra to respond before the March Commission meeting. Ms. Savage stated that in his letter to Mr. Hunt and the Charter Commission dated April 24, 1985, Mr. Terpstra cited ancient case laws and stated that opinions seemed to be divided on this issue. She felt they should be practical about this. In the past the Commission has had a hard time gettinq people to serve on the Commission; and then when they do have people who are serving and who are interested in serving more time, there is this question of whether some of these people can continue to serve an extra term. She thought they should write a letter to the Judge, Bruce Douglas, explaining the situation to him and getting an opinion from him. Mr. Nelson stated he would agree with Ms. Savage's suggestion. But, it should also be pointed out to Judge Douglas that in the past other people have resigned basically at the end of their term, so there is a continuity from past practices that might not be the same. Mr. Stouffer stated it should be expressed that in the past no one has brought this issue forward and some members continue to serve. So, some of the people who resigned might have done so with the full intent of not serving again. Mr. Nelson stated that was true, and they really have no way of knowing that. But, the Judge should know what the past practices have been and make a decision based on that. Mr. Betzold stated they should send the letter to the Judge and let the Judge make the final decision. -3- 18C CHARTER COMMISSION MEETIN(�, JANIIARY 30. 1989 Mr. Hunt stated he did allude in his letter to Mr. Terpstra to the suggestion made by Ken Raschke of the Attorney General's office that it might, after all, be up to the Judge to interpret the statute. MOTZON by Mr. van Dan, seconded by Mr. Nelson, to table discussion on this item until the March Commission meeting. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON HLNDLEY DECLARED TH8 MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. 5. CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MEMBERSHIP IN THE CHARTER COMMISSION• Mr. Hunt stated that right now with the appointment of John Silliman, there are no vacancies on the Charter Commission. However, there are eight people whose terms expire on May 11, 1989. Five of those people are finishing their first terms, and the question is whether they want to be nominated to a second term. Three of those people have completed at least one full term and all or a portion of a first term. Those three people are Bruce Nelson, Donald Betzold, and Ralph Stouffer. Mr. Stouffer, Mr. Betzold, and Mr. Nelson stated they are willing to continue to serve on the Commission, if it is found by the attorney or the Judge that they are eligible to serve another full term. Mr. Nelson did express some concern because it has been the practice in the past that Gommission members who served a partial term and another full term did go off the Commission. Mr. Stouffer stated he certainly would like to see the issue of the terms of office brought to a closure so everyone knows the rules. 6, CONSIDERATION OF THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS IN THE CHARTER COMMISSION: Mr. Hunt stated he had written a letter to Mr. Terpstra on January 20, 1989, regarding this issue. In the letter he stated it would appear that a change in the number of inembers of the Charter Commission to a number less than fifteen members, but not less than seven, could be accomplished by amending the Charter by one of the ways provided in M.S. 410.12, and he was asking Mr. Terpstra if that interpretation is correct. At this time, he has not received any response from Mr. Terpstra. 7, CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE BYLAWS OF THE CHARTER COMMISSION: Mr. Nelson stated Ms. Hendley had appointed Mr. van Dan, Ms. Schei, -s- 18D CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 30, 1989 and himself to a subcommittee to study the Bylaws and make any recommendations for amendments. He stated he was appointed chairperson of the subcommittee. . Mr. Nelson stated Ms. Schei could not be at the meetinq because of illness, but she had a couple of possible recommendations for changes. 1. Ms. Schei felt the Commission should specify the number of ineetings they have. At this time, there is nothing in the Bylaws that say they will even have meetings. 2. Ms. Schei was concerned about attendance. Mr. Nelson stated a separate issue that Ms. Schei had raised was the fact that the Commission members do not receive their agenda packets until the Friday before the Monday meeting. Because of weekend commitments, Ms. Schei did not feel that the members had adequate time to review the material before the meeting. Mr. Nelson stated it would be his preference to have the agendas delivered at least one week (two weekends) before the meeting. Mr. Stouffer stated he would be concerned about information that is not available when the agenda packets are delivered. If there is a significant amount of new material or if something is fairly important, could that be delivered the Friday before the meeting? Mr. Hunt stated staff can certainly rearrange their schedule and have the agenda packets delivered two Fridays before the meeting. Additional materials can either be mailed or delivered prior to the meeting. Mr. Nelson stated Mr. van Dan had some additional points regarding possible amendments to the Bylaws. Mr. van Dan stated the authors of the present Bylaws (1979-80) were Larry Commers (now Chairperson of the HRA), David Schaaf, Susan Jackson, and himself. At the time, they did not realize some of the implications, so the Bylaws rewrite was mostly procedural. It came to his realization after reviewing the Bylaws and noting in the City of Minneapolis where the Charter Commission is on a collision course with the City Council that the Fridley Charter Commission does quite a bit more than what is contained in the Bylaws. Mr. van Dan stated the Charter regulates the processes of government as well as the Charter Commission's relationship to the City Council. The Commission members are not elected officials; -5- 18E CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 30. 1989 elected officials; neither are they appointed by the Council. They are the only municipal commission which is not. The Charter Commission is regulated by Minnesota Statutes 410.05. He thought that the Bylaws should really spell out qu�te a few things they have just accepted as consuetudo so far. Mr. van Dan stated they should have spelled out, unlike any other municipal commission, that they have an inherent right to have their own legal counsel (Mr. Terpstra), they should have a recording secretary distinctly different from the officer secretary of the Commission, and they are entitled ta have their own staff or liaison to the City administration. And, they should be defrayed of the cost. Mr. van Dan stated the Commission's Bylaws should stipulate and resolve, because they are a sovereign body just like a convention that can make its own rules, what they consider a term of membership. As long as it is not inconsistent with State Statute 410.05, the Commission can define for themselves, if someone is appointed by the Chief Justice of the Judicial District, if a partial term is considered to be a full term and a person succeeds that term by reappointment, can that person succeed farther on or not? Mr. Betzold stated the Commission already has staff, legal counsel, and a recording secretary so why do they need to spell it out in the Bylaws? Secondly, it was not for the Commission to interpret Minnesota Statutes. Minnesota Statutes, by the Legislature, says that the Charter Commission members, for those cities that have Charters, cannot serve more than two terms. It is the judicial branch of government that interprets statutes, not the Charter Commission. So, it is beyond the scope and authority of the Charter Commission to make that kind of decision, and that is why the question is being submitted to legal counsel and the Judge. Mr. van Dan stated he did not agree. He stated an appointment order that is signed by Judge Douglas states: " is appointed to the Charter Commission of (city) until a successor is appointed and qualified and subject to the statutes in such case made." What does "appointed and qualified" mean? He stated it means that once that term for four years is filled out, that person cannot serve anymore, even if reappointed. So, the Commission can define membership in the Bylaws as long as it is not inconsistent with State Statutes. Mr. van Dan stated right now the Commission is on excellent terms with the City Council. But, if at some time, the City Council does not want to pay for the Charter Commission's attorney, if it is -6- 18F CHARTER COMMISSION MEBTING, JANUARY 30. 1989 already stated in the Bylaws that the Commission shall have an attorney paid for by the City taxpayers, this Contmission as long as it exists shall have an attorney. This is the same for the recording secretary and staff liaison. Mr. Betzold stated if the Commission was ever in the situation where the Charter Commission was at odds with the City Council, the Commission could go right to the Judge who appointed the members and ask the Judge to order the City Council to make these services available. It does not have to be spelled out in the Bylaws. Mr. van Dan stated he had suggested to Mr. Nelson, chairperson of the subcommittee, that all this should be in an ordinance acknowledged by the City Council. Mr. Nelson disaqreed with that suggestion, so he was reporting his opinions to the Commission. Mr. Nelson stated he felt some of the points made by Mr. van Dan were valid. Ms. Hendley stated she would like to see these proposals submitted in writing to the Commission from the subcommittee. Ms. Savage agreed. The suggestions should be in the form of actual amendments to the Bylaws. Some of the things suggested by Mr. van Dan might be valid, but she questioned whether they should be included in the Bylaws. She would like to have some guidelines as to what properly goes into bylaws. She has always thought of bylaws as the governing body of an organization and a lot of it is just procedural. � Mr. Stouffer suggested that staff obtain copies of other bylaws from other Charter Commissions. Then, if this Commission decides to go with some of the suggestions for amendments, there might already be similar verbiage in other bylaws. Mr. Hunt stated the State Statute states: "The Charter Commission within 30 days after the initial appointment of the Commission shall make rules including quorum requirements with reference to its operations and procedures." The Statute also states: "The members of such commission shall receive no compensation but the commission may employ an attorney and other personnel to assist in framing such Charter and any amendment or revision thereof and the reasonable compensation and the cost of printing such a Charter or any amendment or revision thereof when so directed by the commission, shall be paid by such city." , Mr. Hunt stated he would send copies of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 410, to the Commission members for their informationp -7- 18G CHARTER COMMISSION MEETIN(3. JANOARY 30. 1989 MOTION by Mr. Stouffer, seconded by Mr. Carlson, to receive the report from the subcommittee regarding possible amendments to the Commission Bylaws. UPON A VOICE DOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPBRBON HENDLEY DECLARED TH$ MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. MOTION by Mr. Stouffer, seconded by Mr. van Dan, to direct the Bylaws subcommittee to submit in written form those sections of the Bylaws they would like discussed for future amendments; and to direct staff to obtain copies of bylaws from other cities and a copy of State Statute, Chapter 410. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY$, CHAIRPERSON HBNDLEY DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED DNANIMOIISLY. 8, CONSIDERATION OF MEETING DATES AND TIMES: MOTION by Mr. Stouffer, seconded by Mr. Nelson, to approve the following Charter Commission meeting dates for 1989: Feb. 27 Sept. 18 March 27 Oct. 16 April 24 Nov. 20 May 22 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN�3 AYB, CHAIRPERSON HENDLEY DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. g. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING AMENDED CITY CHARTER (REPLACEMENT PAGES)• Mr. Hunt stated some items were not included in the agenda packet and the Commission members should wait to receive the Charter replacement pages until the next meeting. 10. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Nominating Committee Chairperson Hendley appointed Mr. van Dan, Mr. Carlson, and herself to the nominating committee to report the nominations of one or more candidates for each office for the election to be held at the annual meeting in March. b. Annual Report of the Fridley Charter Commission -8- CHARTER COMMISSION MEETIN�3. JANUARY 30. 1989 Mr. Hunt stated the Commission members had received a copy of a Ietter from Judge Douglas addressed to Margaret Hendley dated January 26, 1989, thanking the Commission for forwarding to him the Annual Report of the Charter Commission. c. City Charter Mr. Hunt stated that in a previous meeting, the Charter Commission suggested that a comprehensive look should be made of the Charter to see if there are other areas in the Charter that are contrary to State Law. He stated will be meeting with Kay Tischler-Erickson the next day, and she will be undertakinq this task in the weeks and months ahead. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Stouffer, seconded by Mr. Carlson, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Hendley declared the January 30, 1989, Charter Cominission meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �.e.. Lyn Saba Recording Secretary -9- 18H 19 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICEN888 FRIDLEY March 20, 1 � Type of License: FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Children's World 5310 Monroe St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55421 Dairy Queen 280 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley High School 6000 W. Moore Lk.Dr. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Fridley Middle School 6100 W. Moore Lk. Dr. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Hayes Elem. School 615 Mississippi St. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Lynn's Cake & Candy Supplies 7930 University Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 North Park E.em. School 5575 Fillmore St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Pizza Hut 255 - 57th Ave.N.E. Fri dl ey, P•1n. 55432 Redeemer Lutheran Church 61 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Stevenson Elem. School 6080 E. River Rd. Fridley, Mn. 55432 The Sunshine Place Rest. 5201 Central Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55421 By: Same Donald Fitch Pat Rue Pat Rue Pat Rue Stephen Kraatz Elaine Niesche for Col. Hgts. ApproVed By: Pizza Huts of the N.W. Laurance 6. Anderson Pat Rue Tony M. Bakhtiari Fees• $45.00 $45.00 Exempt Exempt Exempt $45.00 Exempt $45.00 Exempt Exempt $45.00 20 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOOD ESTABLISHMENT CQNT. Totino's Foods 7350 Commerce Lane Fridley, Mn. 55432 Valley Christian Church 1280 Regis Lane Fridley, Mn. 55432 . Woodcrest School Dist.#16 880 Osborne Rd. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 GAMBLING Maple Lanes Bowling Center 6310 Hwy. 65 N.E. Fridiey, Mn. 55432 CHARITABLE GAMBLING PERMIT Knights of Col. Aux. 6831 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 MOTEL Sunliner Mote1 6881 Highway 65 N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 PRIVATE GAS PUMP City of Fridley 400 - 71st Ave.N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 REFUSE HAULERS Ace Solid Waste Mgt.,Inc. 3118 - 162nd Lane N.W. Andover, Mn. 55304 Hilger Transfer 8550 Zachary Ln. Mapie.Grove, Mn. 55369 Metro Refuse 8168 W. 125th St. Savage, Mn. 55378 Richard Craig Bruce Brown Cary G. Erickson Lions Club Judith Grommesh Eugene Kreuzkemper Ralph Volkman Dean 0. Warden David A. Klatke, Jr. Wm. T. Butler LICSNSBB $45.00 Exempt Exempt James P. Hill $300.00 Public Safety Director James P, Hill Asking Fees Public Safety Dir. to be waived Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector $195.00 Exempt E,.� �� $60.00 $90.00 2oa r� 20C 21 21A City of Fridley Engineering Department 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Date: March 8, 1989 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Re: Final Estimate City of Fridley Per. Endinq: March 8, 1989 6431 University Avenue N.E. For: Layne Minnesota Co. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 3147 California St. N.E. • Minneapolis, MN 55418 Well #6 STATEMENT OF WORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTRACT PROGRESS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contract Item Estimated Unit Quant. Qty. Amount Quantities Price This Est. To Date To Oate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pull inspect and reinstall pump 1 $2,000.00 1 1 $2,000.00 Rubber bearings 12 15.00 , 12 12 180.00 1�"x5' lineshaft 1 65.00 1 1 65.00 1�"x10' lineshafts 6 75.00 6 6 450.00 1�" shaft couplings 7 8.00 7 7 56.00 Bronze spider 1 42.00 1 1 42.00 10"x10' suction pipe 1 200.Q0 ] 1 200.00 10"x9'll'�" T&C column pipe 11 245.00 11 11 2,695.00 10"x5' T&C column pipe 1 175.00 1 i 115.00 10"x5' TBE column pipe ] 135.00 1 1 135.00 1�" top special stainless steel driveshaft T 250.00 1 1 250.00 Bowl bushings 5 5.00 5 5 25.00 Stuffing box bushing 1 50.00 1 1 50.00 Box pump packing 1 25.00 1 1 25.00 Impeller wear rings 5 35.00 5 5 115.00 Bowl shaft stainless steel material 1 150.00 1 1 150.00 10" VTS cone strainer 232.80 1 1 232.80 120' of 10" heavy wa11 .365 pipe 191.40 1 1 191.40 Water level indicator 1 25.00 1 1 25.00 Column shaft, inspect, clean, sandblast & paint 1 110.00 1 T 110.00 Columr� pipe, sandblast & paint (120' setting) 12 40.00 12 12 480.00 Disinfect well & pump 1 250.00 1 1 25Q.QQ Test pumping 1 500.00 1 1 500.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL $8,462.20 SUMMARY: Origina� contract amount Contract additions - change order nos. Contract deductions - change order nos. Revised contract amount Value completed to date SUB TOTAL Amount retained (a OX�) Less amount paid previously AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR ----------------------------- $8,462.20 0 0 0 8,462.20 8,462.20 0 1,000.00 $7,462.20 I hereby certify that the work performed and the materia]s supplied to date under terms of the contract for the reference project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actuat value under the contract of the amounts shown on this estimate (and the final quantities of the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and correct and no part f the "Amou D e This E imate" has been received. /� � B y �' G'ti�i�%�� r�-�=�.-f Qd te 3� � ctor�s Kuinoriz CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER --------------------------- entative Title I hereby certify that I have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment of this estimate under the contract for reference project. CITY OF FRIDLEY, INSPECTOR � �.,J. / �=-=.� i Checked by: i � �-R��J Date -� /D , Respectfuily Submitted, City of Fridley By . Flora, .E. ' ector of Pubiic Works 21B CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 March 8, 1989 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c/o William Burns, City Manager 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Council Members: CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Final Estimate for Well No. 6 Improvements for Layne Minnesota Company, 3147 California Street, N.E., Minneapolis, MN 55418. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Well No. 6 Improvements and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recomnend that finai payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body. Respectfully submitted, John G. Flora, P.E. Public Works Director Prepared by�'�� n�� Checked by. 21C March 8, 1989 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley 21D REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR CITY OF FRIOLEY WELL N0. 6 IMPROVEMENTS We the undersigned, have inspected the above mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantiaily complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the project. All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor. So, therefore, we recor�nend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor. Gi , Ralph Vo]kman, Public Works Superintendent �; %2.G�S � �iZ�� tractor Representative, (Title) March 8, 1989 City of Fridley WELL N0. 6 IMPROVEMENTS CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR - 21E This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above mentioned projects in accordance wath the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $7,462.20 and the final payment of $7,462.20 for the improvement project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work done by the contractor under this project. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. Layne Minnesota Company C V' e n� ntractor Representative Title) 1