The URL can be used to link to this page

05/15/1989 - 5391RICK PRIBYL FINANCE DIRECTOR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 15, 1989 �„z.f-S � . ,�4c•r, `� -�-�I � � U - �zu�'��J ��z-� .,� /!�/� -i � �,t��Yvts�, �a � , a��, �,._ �� G��►��?��-- �?�� . � �d�� -� �/au% ��c7"5�� %�G c.� �u � v � d� //�. �� • /G'� (/Nr'd�r�� - .tr c, ,'�' i�J t' �'„ . �� ,`�-�z��. � / /�. G�-'-^��'� �`� 2�0 � ��.�.� �� ( C� � , N`r� � S� z %r �� /�� ..� �� -� 1 � 1 �- f��r��f��_ .�� , /� �z �. �� J��-:�� c'?"�i.. �4c. / � f . ., �. � „ „ Z Z'�7S %y ,�jj��f'� i�aS��Y>!//` l��'�1�� iI'r 7 % W� �`_ � � / �X /�� y% \ yC�./ � + ! " 1��"�� , � �L i�u� � �� o 7Y� �/ 1 � � �',�!"t Sfit�' � .�-�� - �- _ �� TM� FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETIN(3 !�a- ATTENDENCE SHEET MONDAY p�� , 1989 �:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ` PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER � �� ►��0,�� ;� �1/- �" . � ` �r�i�t �� , l �c� � C a-��e �� '�- �Y - C . e._ b C `"� � rh ��5 .✓' rs %� �' �" I/ � �� — � � 1 c�'.c� / 3 7� /�� rE��i' /� • C��- �� A- �� . � � �s�--� c� �_ � " J �)�. - �� K ( �1, tl � - , P C -�) � ,p 1 V v `� �1,� i.%rA.O.��'-AL--�_ � �..�. - J� ` � % � ;��..�- V � I� ��,� - �. -� .� //�,v.�-, �v � / � � � �( l �'r / � S`- �//c F�s�.Dr �� ,, � �- � ve, � � � �7 �._� ,, i � ;n � � ,� /� �l C ��-�� „ t C �!u- '� �CrY� � � aa�� m�� v..2 � C'., � �� - � � l� �.�. .�� G�,��.,�� ' � ��/ � � E�r ,�/i.r� �U�i/15o � �'�/J� �� Eh � ��' �� ` , n �'� � �l(f �r' �% 1� �` I' /Z �j �/ � �j�// —, / C._ -�1 8 �i ►tit. � ��'W I i LS L �Y�(�� -yl � � � � � � � ./ �� . � ' � ` EJh Gil�/d � (/ �� KY' � / c'_ (t_ S t' �� /' � � p�./rir+��U�� f JJ✓,J/'J Y.u.zJhi j� (p `? � �! �(,A„ r lI �C �� . � l� ��a�m�� 1`f60 ��.e. �cel� -�r, 5�01 `7-s-�b�`� `v�+ i. o ✓u1. Q '� i°r``VL �� m� FRIDIEY CITr COUMCIL IEETiM6, lU1Y 15, 1989 - 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALIEGIANCE: PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION: VETERAN'S BUDDT PDPPr DAT MAY 19, 1989 NATIONAL PUBLIC L�tKS WEEK MAY P1 - 27, 1989 APPROVAL OF MINUTES� Board of Revieu, Aprit 10, 1989 Continued Board of Revieu, April 17, �989 Contirwed Board of Review, May 1, 1989 City Council Meeting, May 1, 7989 ADOPTION OF f1GENDA- OPEN FORU1. VISITORS: (Consideration of items not on agenda - 15 minutes) PUBLIC HEARING� Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #89-01, to Rezone the Properties Described as lots t, 2, 28 and 29, elock 2, Caimerce Park, fram C-1, Local Business, to C-2, Generat Business, the Same Being 250 Osborne Road N.E., by Jerane Farrell. . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1 R NEW BUSINESS: Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Comnission Meeting of May 3, 1989:. ....... 2- 2 M A. Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Rezoning 20A #89-01, by Jerame Farrell..... 2L-2R, & 2V-2N B. Consideration of Se;ting Public �`�y✓�� `~} Hearing on June 19, 1989 on - Vacation Request, SAV #89-02, _ to Vacate the 30 Foot Drainage and Utility Easement located on lots ��N OF 1, 2, 28 and 29, Block 2, Ca�merce F(j�DLEY Park, the Same Being 250 Osborne Road N.E., by Jerome Ferre[1...... 2R-2S 8 2X-2AA Item fram the Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of April 25, 1989:. . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 CC A Consideratio� of a Variance, VAR #89-04, to Reduce the front Yard Setbeck fram 35 Feet to 15 Peet to Allow the Con- struction of a Movie Theater; to Reduce the Side Corner Yard Setback from 35 Feet to 20 feet to Alloa the Construction of a freestanding Cortmercial Building; to Reduce the Number of Required Parking Stalls from 384 to 335; to Reduce the Size of a Parking Stall from 10 Feet by 20 feet to 4 Feet by 18 Feet; and to Reduce the Parking Setback from 20 Feet to 17 Feet; Located on Lots 1, 2, 28 and 29, Blxk 2, Camierce Park, the Same Being 250 Osborne Road N.E., by Jerane Farrell Continued fram the Planning Commission Meeting of May 3, 1989 :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 X C. Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #89-06, per Section 205.07.01.C(4) of the Fridley City Code, to Operate a Daycare Center for 35 Children in Rooms 102, 104 and 106 of the Islamie Center, on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17 and 33, Meloland Gardens, the Same Being 1401 Gardena Avenue N.E., by Islamic Center of Minnesota....... 2-m, & 4-4L D. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing on June 5, 1989 on Pre- liminary Plat, P. S. �f87-O5, Target Northern Distribution Center Addi- tion, to Create Two Lots by Replatting Outlot '!, Block 1, Fridley industrial Pa�k Plat 1, Anoka County Minnesota, Subject to Easements, by Target Stores, Inc . ..................... 2D-2L, � 4M-4X fRIDLET CITT f:(3lAlCIt MEETING - PAGE 2 Consideration of Receiving Bids � and Auarding Contract for ihe = NEY BUSlNESS (CONTit�JED): Dictation Equipment for the 'Municipel Center. . . . . . . . . 11 11 A item frart the Mirwtes of the Appeals Cortmission Meeting of May 9, 1989e. . ... 5- 5 P A. Consideratian of a Variance, VAR #89-UT, to lncrease the _ Height of a euilding from 45 Feet to 52 feet; and to Reduce the Distarxe from the Hard- Consideration of Participation in Surface Area to the euilding °Celebrate Minnesota 1990°. . . ..... 12 - 92 F Fran 5 feet to 1 and 2 feet, to Altow the Construction of an OfficP Buiiding Lxated on Lot 1, Btock 1, Hillwirxi Addi- tion, the Same Being 941 Hitlwind Road, and on Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25, the Same eeing 1001 Hilluind road N.E., Appointment: City Emptoyee . . ..... 13 by Cheryt Stinski Claims . . . . . . . , . . 14 Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Entering into a Sixth Rider Agreement Setween the City of Fridley and the Board of Yater Carmissioners With the � City of St. Paul . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - b E % Consideration of an Anoka County s �N�,�-a C• Regional Railroad Authority W�,� f�"� � Study Grant Agreement Betueen Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority and the City of Fridtey ...... . 7- 7 H �}f Consideration of Change Order No. 5 for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1988 - 1 & 2 : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 C „i� Consideration of Change Orde� No. 8 for Fridley Municipal Center Project � No. 189 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 B Co�sideration of Authorizing the Advertisement for Bids for the Satellite fire Station . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 A L i censes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 15 F Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 a Adjourn: FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL KE$TINQ, 1dAY 15, 1989 PAGE 2 PIIBLIC HEARING: Consideration of a Rezoning Request, ZOA #89-01, to Rezone the Properties Described as Lots 1, 2, 28 and 29, ' • Black 2, Commerce Park, from C-1, Local Business, to C-2, General. Business, the Same Being 250 Osborne Road N.E., by Jerome Farrell. . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1 R NEN BIISINESS: Receiving the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 3, 1989:. ....... 2- 2 AA A. Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Rezoning ZOA #89-01, by Jerome Farrell..... 2L-2R, & 2V-2W B. Consideration of Setting Public Hearing on June 19, 1989 on Vacation Request, SAV #89-02, to Vacate the 30 Foot Drainage and Utility Easement Located on Lots 1, 2, 28 and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, the Same Being 250 Osborne Road N.E., by Jerome Farrell...... 2R-2S & 2X-2AA FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1�[EBTIN(i� �t]i1Y 15� 1989 PAGE 3 NEW BIISINEBS (CONTINIIED): Item from the Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of April 25, 1989 :. . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3 CC A. Consideration of a Variance, VAR #89-04, to Reduce the Front Yard Setback from 35 Feet to 15 Feet to Allow the Con- struction'of a Movie Theater; to Reduce the Side Corner Yard Setback from 35 Feet to 20 Feet to Allow the Construction of a Freestanding Commercial Building; to Reduce the Number of Required Parking Stalls from 384 to 335; to Reduce the Size of a Parking Stall from 10 Feet by 20 Feet to 9 Feet by 18 Feet; and to Reduce the Parking Setback from 20 Feet to 17 Feet; Located on Lots 1, 2, . 28 and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, the Same Being 250 Osborne Road N.E., by Jerome Farrell Continued from the Planning Commission Meetinq of May 3, 1989 :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4 X C. Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #89-06, per Section 205.07.O1.C(4) of the Fridley City Code, to Operate a Daycare Center for 35 Children in Rooms 102, 104 and 106 of the Islamic Center, on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17 and 33, Meloland Gardens, the Same Being 1401 Gardena Avenue N.E., by Islamic Center of Minnesota....... 2-2D, & 4-4L FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL i[B$TINO, ltl►Y 15, 1989 PAGE 4 NEW BIISINE88 (CONTINIIED): D. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing on June 5, 1989 on Pre- liminary Plat, P. S. �87-05, Target Northern Distribution Center Addi- tion, to Create Two Lots by Replatting Outlot 1, Block 1, Fridley Industrial Park Plat 1, Anoka County Minnesota, Subjeat to Easements, by Target Stores, Inc . ..................... 2D-2L, & 4M-4X Item from the Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of May 9, 1989:. ....... 5- 5 P A. Consideration of a Variance, VAR #89-07, to Increase the Height of a Building from 45 Feet to 52 Feet; and to Reduce the Distance From the Hard- �Surface Area to the Building From 5 Feet to 1 and 2 Feet, to Allow the Construction of an Office Building Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Hillwind Addi- tion, the Same Being 941 Hillwind Road, and on Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25, the Same Being 1001 Hillwind road N.E., by Cheryl Stinski Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Entering into a Sixth Rider Agreement Between the City of Fridley and the Board of Water Commissioners with the City of St. Paul . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6 E FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL l�EETING, MAY 15� 1989 PAGE 5 NEW BDSINE88 (CONTINIIED): Consideration of an Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority ; Study Grant Agreement Between - Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority and the City of Fridley ........ 7- 7 H Consideration of Change Order No. 5 for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1988 - 1 & 2 : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8 C Consideration of Change Order No. 8 for Fridley Municipal Center Project No. 189 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9 B Consideration of Authorizing the Advertisement for Bids for the Satellite Fire Station . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10 A Consideration of Receiving Bids and Awarding Contract for the Dictation Equipment for the Municipal Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11 A !'RIDLBY CITY COIINCIL �L88TING� IiAY 15� 1989 PlIGE 6 �TEW BD8INE88 (CONTINIIED): a Consideration of Participation in "Celebrate Minnesota 1990". . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12 � Appointment: City Employee . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 15 F Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16 a Adjourn: • VETERAN'S BUDDY POPPY DAY May 19,1989 William J. Nee Mayor Fridley. MN WHEREAS, the annual sale of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans ofForeign Wars of the United States has been o�cially recognized and endorsed by governmental leaders since 1922; and WHEREAS, VFW Buddy Poppies are assembled by disabled veterans, and the proceeds of this worthy fund-raising campaign are used exclusively for the benefit of disabled and needy veterans, and the widaws and orphans of deceased veterans; and WHEREAS, the brlsic purpose of the annual sale of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars is eloquently re}lected in the desire to "honor the dead by helping the living"; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 1, William J. Nee, Mayor of the city of Fridley, Minnesota do hereby proclaim May 19,1989 as VETERAN'S BUDDY POPPY DAY and urge Friddey citiZens to recognize the merits of rhis cause by contributing generously to its support through the purchase of Buddy Poppies on the day set aside for the distribution of these symbols of appreciation for the sacrifices of our honored dead. I further urge all patriotic citizens to wear a Buddy Poppy as mute evidence of our gratitude to the men and wanen of this country who have risked their lives in defense of the freedoms which we continue to enjoy as American citizens. IN WIT7VESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Fridley to be af�xed this 1 Sth day of May,1989. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR VYilliam J. Nee Mayor Fridley. MN • '• NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK May 21-27,1989 WHEREAS, public works services provided in our com»iunity are an integral part of our citiZens' everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets, highways, parks, public buildings, and snow removal; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the qualiry and e,�`'ectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, maintenance, and construction is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skills of public works personnel; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualifzed and dedicated personnel who staff public works deparnnents is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, William 1. Nee, Mayor of the City of Fridley hereby proclaim May 21-27,1989 as NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK in the City of Fridley, and call upon all citizens and civic organiu�tions to acquaint themselves with the problems involved in providing our public works, and to recognize the contributions which public works personnel make every day to our health, safety, and comfort. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Fridley w be a,,�xed this lSth day of May,1989. . WII.LIAM J. NEE, MAYOR ._ __ _ THE MINIITES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COIINCZI, BOARD OF RSVIRW MEETINQ� OF APRIL 10, 1989 � Jt • 4*�• ti� • 4:�. : • � ; � • ' � �f aL • � CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Nee called the meetinq of the Board of Review to order at 7:30 p.m. � . ROLL CALL• � � MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman � Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billings MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Schneider Mayor Nee stated the City Council meets as the Board of Review to review issues concerning the proposed market value established for properties in the City by the City Assessor's Office. Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated the values assigned to the properties affect taxes payable in 1990. He introduced Mr. Gordon Starkey and Mr. A1 Barck of the Anoka County Assessor's Office. Mr. Madsen stated this Board has the power to increase, decrease, or affirm values on properties as assessed by the Assessor's Office. He stated a number of calls were received as there were some fairly substantial increases. Mr. Madsen stated il persons called and indicated they wished to voice a protest and the Council may receive more before the end of the meeting. 1. BLAINE AND LEE JONES. 54 LOCKE LAKE ROAD: Ms. Jones stated they have two plats of land and one is valued separately as there is no structure on it. She stated they have lived in this home since 1986 and, in reviewing the values, it was noted the value on the parcel with the home has increased a little under 12 percent and the vacant property has increased over 14 percent. Ms. Jones stated the taxes have increased 24 percent. She stated her concern is that it is such a Iarge increase in value for the short period of time they have owned the property. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if Ms. Jones was referring to the taxes payable to the City or the entire tax bill. Ms. Jones stated the increase covers the entire tax bill. She stated if the trend is to have this much of an increase every year, she felt it was excessive. Ms. Jones stated they do not have access to any of the parks or any sidewalks, but still pay extremely high taxes for this location. She stated they were not the only ones who have a concern as other neighbors are also concerned about taxes and the park access question. Mr. Jones stated they have to cross Locke Lake, railroad tracks, or East River Road in order to have access to a park. $OARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 10. 1989 PAGE 2 Mrs. Jones stated they paid $130,000 for the home in 1986 and the market value placed on the property is now $137,600. She questioned why the value on the vacant lot would increase 14 perce�t when it is not buildable. � Mr.• Madsen st�ted land values increased this year, basically, 14 perce�� across-tfie-board. Ms. Jones asked if the parcels were combined into one tax parcel if this would change the value. Mr. Madsen stated the Assessor's Office viewed the property as one lot and proportioned the increase for land values to the vacant property. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked the reason for the 14 percent increase in land values. Mr. Madsen stated a study was done throughout the County and if Fridley had not increased land values, the City would have been on a lower ratio than other cities in the County. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if this action to increase the land values was on the City's part or direction from the County. Mr. Madsen stated it was a cooperative effort as the ratio was below 90 percent and the State would like it to be within 93 to 95 percent. He stated the land value for this property is $45,300 for a parcel about 150 by 261 feet. Mr. Jones stated Locke Lake has eroded the yard and part has fallen into the lake. Mr. Madsen stated probably not quite one half of the lot is under water. He stated the lot is one of the larger lots in terms of square footage. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated the Board's purpose is to determine if the value placed on the property is the true market value. Mr. Jones asked if all property values in Fridley increased by 14 percent. Mr. Madsen stated all single family residential building sites increased by this percentage. Mr. Jones asked if the areas experiencing increases had access to the City's park system. He questioned if this is taken into consideration in establishing property values. .l� ' � � �- YI � ' ; 1 ' ; Mr. Madsen stated if there was a trend where actual Bales were hiqher in areas where there is park access as opposed to those.who do not have this access, it would be recoqnized. He etated he cannot�recall the presence of a park being an influence.in the value:�of�property. He stated he has found p�ople who live right next to a park have concerns. � Councilman �Billings asked Mrs. Jones what she felt was the fair market value bf her property. Mrs. Jones stated she did not think the $137,600 figure was unreasonable, but felt it was increasing at an unusually high rate which is probably unrealistic for the area. She stated the taxes have increased almost 25 percent in two years. Councilman Billings stated the taxes for the City have remained very stable. He stated this year there was an increase in the taxes for the County and School District. Mrs. Jones felt somewhere along the line there has to be a limit for the benefits they are receiving. She stated there is a lack of parks and sidewalks and felt they were on the losing end with a 12 percent increase in the assessed value over the last two years. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated if the argument was that the property could not be sold anywhere near the value placed cn it, a change could be considered. He stated, however, this is not the case. Mr. Burns, City Manager, questioned how the value of this property related to others in the area and why the home was assessed for more than the sale price. Mr. Madsen stated the sale was in 1986 and from this date and the beginning of 1989, there was an increase in the market values. He stated for properties on Locke Lake, ratios were compared for five parcels and they were at 94 percent. Mayor Nee stated the reason the gross taxes escalated was because the write-down the State gives becomes less when you get into that price home. MOTION by Councilman Billings to reaffirm the value of $137,600 placed on this property by the City Assessor's Office. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. TERRY MICKLEY. 241 RICE CREEK TERRACE: Mr. Mickley was not present at this time, therefore, the following action was taken: : • ' ' � • � � • � ' 1 MOTION by eouncilman Billings to table this item to the end of the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votir�g aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. ' N�RISPINS C820 OAKLEY STREET: Mr. Crispin was not present at this time, therefore, the following action was taken: MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item to the end of the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4. GEORGE ZUK, 721 68TH AVENUE: Mr. Zuk stated his market value last year was $66, 300 and this year it is $69, 700. He stated he has a letter from a realtor, Jeff Firnstahl, who assessed the property between $66,000 and $69,000. He stated he cannot sell his home for $69,700 and the property is over valued. Mr. Madsen stated four properties in the area were sold in 1988 which were comparable to Mr. Zuk's property. He stated the property at 6830 Monroe Street sold in May of 1988 for $74,500 and it was valued $700 higher than Mr. Zuk's. He stated a home at 6842 Monroe Street sold in August, 1988 for $74,500 and $72,100 is the value on this property. He stated the property at 6598 Monroe Street sold for $76,000 in May, 1988 and $71,800 is the value placed on this property. He stated another comparable home at 6870 Brookview Drive sold in April, 1988 for $75,500. Mr. Madsen felt all these homes were comparable with Mr. Zuk's as far as square footage and amenities. He stated in taking these sales into account, it would appear Mr. Zuk's value is somewhat low. Mr. Madsen stated he cannot argue with the appraisal received by Mr. Zuk, but does not know what comparables were used. Mr. Zuk stated a home similar to his would sell for about $67,000. He stated it has to be proven to him that he could sell his home for more than this amount. He stated all homes are different and the homes used for comparison probably have a lot of remodeling and are in better shape. Mr. Madsen stated in determining the value, the assumption is made that normal maintenance is provided. He stated values are not reduced if maintenance may have been lax unless it is to the point where there is damage to the property. Mr. Zuk stated the homes Mr. Madsen cited are in much better shape than his home. He �tated they have oak woodwork which he does not. �OARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 10, 1989 PAGE 5 Mr. Madsen stated the first three homes all have pine trim and only one has oak woodwork. . Mr. Zuk stated he has lost two large Elm trees which also.enhance and iricrease the value of a home. . Mr. Madseri:stated trees are not a consideration in determining the value�of the property. � Mr. Zuk stated when you are speaking of market value, trees do add to the value. Mayor Nee stated it is not possible to establish an exact value, but if it is within 90 to 95 percent of the selling price of the property, it would be close. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated she drove by Mr. Zuk�s home and felt it was very comparable to those in the neighborhood. Mr. Zuk stated strictly by driving by one cannot address the market value. He stated he would like to be able to sell his home for $74,000. Mr. Madsen stated the other sales in his neighborhood do reflect that, if Mr. Zuk chose to sell his home, he should be able to get $74,000. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Zuk what made him believe that the realtor who appraised his property was more accurate than the actual fact that homes very similar to his have sold for a higher price. Mr. Zuk stated there are homes comparable to his which have sold for a lot less and would like the decision for the market value based on the actual worth. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Zuk if this item was tabled, if it would give him an opportunity to provide the Assessor's Office with some comparables used by his appraiser. Mr. Zuk stated he would agree with this and would contact the Assessor's Office with additional information. MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to refer this matter to the staff for further study. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. KEN THORNTON, 7325-27 EVERT COURT: Mr. Madsen stated the value established for this duplex is BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 10, 1989 PAGE 6 $130,300. Mr. Thornton stated he is the builder and owner of this property and you cannot sell these buildings. He stated about the time the dup�ex was constructed, the interest rates went to 14 or 16 percent anc� with the Ghange in tax policy, it makes it very difficult to sell �Mese�properties. Mr. Thornton �stated out of 18 properties listed on the multiple listing service for the northeast metropolitan location, 16 have expired and there was no s�le. He stated the duplex across the street is a very similar building to these on Evert Court and they have been on the market for $130,900 and the owner cannot get that price. Mr. Thornton stated if he was a broker, he would not even accept the listing. Mr. Thornton stated a duplex on Mississippi Street, north of Silver Lake Road, sold for $129,000 and this is a huge building and much larger than his duplex. He stated one that is comparable is located at 7642 Woodlawn in New Brighton and it sold for $109,900. Mr. Madsen stated the City does not have a lot of sales for comparison, but there is a 90 percent ratio of the three which were sold. He stated he would not argue the fact that sales for duplexes are down. Mr. Thornton stated the cost to construct the building was about $110,000 to $112,000 and he rents the units for $725 and $700 per month. He stated he loses money on the building. MOTION by Councilman Billings to refer this matter to staff for further study. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. BERNICE COONEY. PROPERTY AT 5407 CENTRAL AVENUE: Mrs. Cooney felt the value placed on this unbuildable lot which is less than 6,000 square feet was too high. She stated it has increased from $5,500 to $10,800. Mr. Madsen stated the value of $10,800 has not changed from last year. He stated the Board did increase the value last year from $5,500 to $10,800. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated this property is the one with the Naegele sign adjacent to Menard's. She stated comparables were done on other Naegele signs in the area. Mrs. Cooney stated you cannot use the lot and is unbuildable. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated the lot is being used and rented to '��i� � � � Y� � 1 Naegele for billboard purposes. MOTION by Councilman Billings to reaffirm the value placed on this property by the City Assessor's Office. Seconded by Cour�cilwoman Jorye�lsori: Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motian carried unanimously. . � Mayor�Nee�stated to Mrs. Cooney she has the right to proceed to the County for a=eview on her-property. 7. MR. DOWDS, FRIDLEY ALTTO SALVAGE, 3737 �AST RIVER ROAD: Mr. Dowds stated he is the owner of the Fridley Auto Salvage on East River Road. He stated he expanded his operation and had to lease an extra one and one-half acres from the Burlington-Northern Railroad. Mr. Dowds stated this leased property is the one in question and felt the value was too high. He stated he has no complaints on the other property he owns. Mr. Dowds felt a$5,040 tax bill for this small piece of property was extreme. He stated it is only about 66,000 square feet in size and, in terms of value, it is not a buildable lot. He stated the property is assessed at about $1.70 a square foot which is the going rate for commercial land in Fridley. He stated this figure is for buildable land which is not the case with this property. He felt this property is a"back lot" and the value should be about 75 cents to $1.00 a square foot. Mr. Dowds stated Denny Taylor, a commercial and industrial real estate broker, stated he would not appraise the property at all because it could not be sold. Mr. Madsen stated he has reviewed the value and it is a unique situation. He stated this property was originally on the rolls of the railroad. He stated when the lease went into effect, the City was asked to establish a value for this property and the rest of the property was used as a comparison. Mr. Dowds stated he is not disputing the other property value, but this property is not buildable. Mr. Madsen stated in reviewing the value of this parcel, it was considered as a value to the railroad, as they are the owner, and Mr. Dowds is only leasing the property. Mr. Dowds stated a lease is usually for five or ten years and this lease is only for six months. Mr. Madsen stated in terms of numbers, he was using an eight to ten percent cap rate and would be willing to go to the ten percent cap rate. : • • • � � i Y�_ • . . � . � . . , • � Mr. Dowds stated that cap rate should be used only for long term leases, and not for a lease of six months. He stated there is no additional value to the properties adjacent to it because it is such a short term lease. . MOT�ON•by Councilman Fitzpatrick to refer this matter to the staff for furth�r�study. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. SKYWOOD MALL 53RD AND CENTRAL AVENUES: MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive the ietter from Marquette State Bank objecting to the value placed on this property and continue this matter to the next meeting. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. FRANK WALZ. 160 HARTMAN CIRCLE: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the letter from Mr. Walz in regard to the value placed on his property. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. TRUSTEE GROUP REALTY 8000 UNIVERSITY 251-71 COMMERCE CIRCLE SOUTH AND 7151 COMMERCE CIRCLE WEST: Mr. Madsen stated he received a phone call objecting to the value placed on these properties. He stated the properties sold for $2,900,000, and a combined value of $3,498,500 has been established for these three parcels. MOTION by Councilman Billings to continue this matter to the next meeting and refer to staff for further study. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. RECC - FRIDLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 7685 MAIN STREET. 7260 UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND 7280 COMMERCE CIRCLE EAST: Mr. Madsen stated a law firm in Chicaqo representing the owners of these three properties has voiced an objection to the values. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to continue this matter to the next meeting and refer to staff for further study. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. NORMAN WESTON, 1651 GARDENA AVENUE: :••'� • y �� 1 Mr. Weston stated he purchased this property a year ago for $90,000. He stated a 110 foot blacktop driveway has been installed and he has replaced the plumbing as the pipes froze this .past winter because they were on the outside, rather than the.inside. Mr. Weston stated he had to replace the electrical eystem as five amg'transformers were used instead of ten amp which made the home a fir.e` haiard.� • - Mr. Weston stated the market value and taxes have increased and he did not believe it should be above $90,000 with all the problems he has had with the home.. Mr. Madsen stated he would like an opportunity for the appraiser to review this property. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to continue this matter to the next meeting and refer to staff for further study. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Since Mr. Mickley was now present at the meeting, the Council considered his item at this time. 2. �ERRY MICKLEY. 241 RICE CREEK TERRACE: Mr. Mickley stated he is questioning the value placed on his new home at 241 Rice Creek Terrace. He stated in building this home, he was concerned about the value of the home due to the neighborhood in which it was located. He stated he sold his previous home at. 231 Rice Creek Terrace for $136,600. He stated that home was larger and had more amenities. Mr. Mickley stated he built this home for about $95,000 not counting the price of the lot. He stated the lot is appraised at $42,000. He felt because of the age of that neighborhood, the home should be valued somewhere between $136,000 and $137,000. He stated the valuation established for this property is $141,500. Mr. Mickley stated because of the neighborhood, he did not feel he could sell this home for $141,500. He stated the home he sold last year at 231 Rice Creek Terrace was the most expensive property in that area. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked Mr. Mickley if he did not feel he moved into a more valuable home than the one he sold. Mr. Mickley stated in order to hold down building costs, he did not install any fireplaces in his new home. He stated what he has in the cost of the construction and the lot is about $123,000. Mr. Madsen stated this property value was reviewed and was originally at $146,600. He stated it was felt by reducinq the BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 10, 1989 PAGE 10 value $5,100, it would be similar to other properties located on the creek.. Mr. Mickley stated the actual cost for construction of the home was $95,296 which includes about $1,200 for landscaping and $6,500 for his� own time. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated the purpose is not to determine the construction costs, but the market value. He stated he was inclined to support the recommendation of the Assessor's Office for a$5,100 reduction in value.or a market value of $141,500. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to reaffirm the Assessor's revised value of $141,500. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. NEIL WANAMAKER, 265 STONEYBROOK WAY: Mr. Wanamaker stated he purchased this home two years ago for less than the appraised value at that time. He stated he received an appraisal from Dave Ryan of Coldwell-Banker and his estimate was $155,500. He stated the City has placed a value of $161,100 on his property. Mr. Madsen stated this is an unusual home and he certainly would like to discuss the matter with Dave Ryan. He stated he did not have a chance to review this property. MOTION by Councilman Billings to continue this matter to the next meeting and refer to staff for further study. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. PATRICIA LEVOIR. 6278 BAKER STREET: Ms. Levoir stated she felt the value placed on her property is close to the asking price if the home was to be sold, however, a realtor told her there usually is about an eight percent difference in market value and sale price. Ms. Levoir stated she had the property appraised two years ago, but did not have this figure with her. Mr. Madsen stated this protest came in this evening and he would like the opportunity to review the property. MOTION by Councilman Billings to continue this matter to the next meeting and refer to staff for further study. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. :�: ' � • � 1!�_ � 1 • � � 15. TILFORD AASEN. 6380 JEFFERSON STREET: . Mr. Madsen stated Mr. Aasen has left the meeting and requested this item be continued to the next meeting. . MOTION�by"�ouncilman Billfngs to continue this matter to the next meeting. Seconded�by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. JOSEPH SINIGAGLIO, 4.715 AND 5191-93 3RD STREET: Mr. Sinigaglio stated his property at 4715 3rd Street has a value placed on it at $71,600. He stated he recently had it appraised at $62,400. He also raised the question of value placed on property he owns at 5191-93 3rd Street. Mr. Madsen stated he has not had an opportunity to review these properties and would request the item be continued. MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to continue this matter to the next meeting and refer to staff for further study. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 17. GEORGE NELSON. 570 BENNETT DRIVE: Mr. Madsen stated Mr. Nelson had indicated that he felt the value on his property was too high, but would not be appealing. MOTION by Councilman Billings to affirm the value placed on this property by the City Assessor's Office. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 18. MARTIN PAULAT, 701 BENNETT DRIVE: Mr. Madsen stated Mr. Paulat had to leave the meeting, but wished to protest the value placed on his property. MOTION by Councilman Billings to continue this matter to the next meeting and refer to staff for further study. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Since Mr. Crispin did not appear at the meeting, the following action was taken: 3. DON CRISPIN, 6820 OAKLEY STREET: MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this matter to the next BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 10, 1989 PAGE 12 meeting. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting_aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT• MOT•ION�by Councilman Fitzpatrick to continue this meeting to April 17, 1989..':Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the meeting adjourned at 9:44 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Recording Secretary Approved: William J. Nee Mayor THE MiNIITEB OF T8E FRIDLBY CITY COiJNCIL COi�i'1'INIIED BOARD OF R$YI$� MEETINa OF AP�tIL 17, 1989 , � TH8 MINUTES OF THL CONTINII}3D BOARD OF REVIEW KEBTINa OF APRIL 17. 989 Mayor Nee reopened the Board of Review meeting, which had been continued from April 10, 1989, at 7:50 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Sillings None Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated his office attempted to contact all persons involved in these cases to advise them of the recommendations being submitted this evening. 1. DON CRISPIN. 6820 OAKLEY STREET: Mr. Madsen stated it is recommended that the value on this property be reduced from $84,100 to $81,200. Mayor Nee asked if Mr. Crispin was aware of this recommendation for the reduction. Mr. Madsen stated a copy of the recommendation was left at Mr. Crispin's home, however, he has not contacted the Assessor's Office. He stated he did not know, therefore, if Mr. Crispin was in agreement with this recommendation. MOTION by Councilman Billings to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office and reduce the estimated market value on this property from $84,100 to $81,200. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. GEORGE ZUK. 721 68TH AVENUE: Mr. Zuk stated he just received a letter today for tonight's meeting. Mayor Nee asked Mr. Zuk if the realtor who appraised his property had provided some comparables to support the rationale for his appraisal. Mr. Zuk stated this was not done as he did not have the time due to sickness in his family and other matters to take care of. He stated, however, he had inspected the property at 6830 Monroe and found that this garage is larger, and the interior and landscaping is in much better condition than his property. Mr. Zuk stated there is also a finished basement which he does not have in his home. Mayor Nee stated the report from the Assessor's Office shows 240 square feet of finished basement. BQARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 17. 1989 PAGE 2 Mr. Zuk stated he has only one small bedroom finished and the rest of the basement is not finished whatsoever. Mr. Madsen stated the room in the basement that is finished has carpeti�g, a drop ceiling, and paneled walls. Mr. Madsen:state8 ;in talking to Mr. Firnstahl who had done the appraisal on this property, he indicated he did not have any comparables and his estimate was based strictly on the property itself. Mr. Madsen stated the carpeting probably needs to be replaced and some painting done in Mr. Zuk's home, however, these items are not taken into consideration when determining the estimated market value. He felt this home is comparable to the ones on Monroe and the one on Brookview Drive which have sold between $74,500 to $76,000. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked the estimated market values for the comparable homes. Mr. Madsen stated they range from $66,200 to $72,100. He stated the lowest one of $66,200 is located on Brookview Drive right on Highway 65 so the land value is less than the homes on Monroe Street. He stated the value of the home itself is also reduced by five percent due to the location. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated Mr. Zuk's estimated market value of $69,700 is almost $1,000 less than the property at 6830 Monroe Street so she felt some of the items Mr. Zuk addressed have been taken into consideration in determining the value of his property. Mr. Zuk stated he understood he had two weeks to bring additional information into the Assessor's Office. Mayor Nee stated if the Board decides to uphold the Assessor's recommendation, Mr. Zuk could appeal to the County at their June 19 meeting. MOTION by Councilman Billings to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office and reaffirm the estimated market value of $69,700 established for this property. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. KENNETH THORNTON. 7325-27 EVERT COURT: Mr. Thornton presented a list of four sales of duplexes in neighboring coaununities which he felt were comparable to his property. He stated there are not a lot of sales of double bungalows because they are not very marketable. He stated with the BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 17. 1989 PAGE 3 property on Woodlawn, it was a repossession, however, the amenities and building plans are the same. Mr. Thornton stated the land value on this property is $13, 000 and his duplex on Ever� Court has a.land value of $19,700 so this would result in a difference of $.6,�7fl0. Mr. Butgusaimf 6160 Kerry Lane, partner of Mr. Thornton, stated these two lots.were within several thousand dollars when they were purchased in 1983 for about $19,000. Mr. Madsen questioned what the lots would sell for today. Mr. Thornton stated he did not have any idea as he was not active in the real estate business. Mr. Thornton stated he calculated the square footage for several comparable buildings and, using these figures as a basis, he felt a value of $110,000 was a fair market value for his property. Councilman Schneider stated the recommendation of the Asesssor's Office is to reduce the value from $130,300 to $120,200. Mr. Thornton stated he still felt $110,000 was a fair value and that the gross rent multiplier should not affect the value. Mr. Madsen stated the property at 1321 Fireside Drive was built in 1978 and sold in December, 1986 for $120,000. He stated he felt a value of $120,200 on Mr. Thornton's property was fair based on the gross rent multiplier. Mr. Thornton questioned the value of the buildinq on Fireside Drive, if the gross rent multiplier method is used since the rents are lower than his building. Mr. Madsen stated using the gross rent multiplier, the value would be $114,000, however, this method is not used for all properties. Mr. Madsen stated the Woodlawn property which is one Mr. Thornton is using as a comparision is located north of the Bellrae Ballroom and in an area of all rental properties. � MOTION by Councilman Schneider to reduce the value on this property from $130,300 to $115,300. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Councilman Schneider stated he realizes that sales of rental properties are declining due to the tax reforms. He stated he does aqree, howver, that the gross rent multiplier is a fairly standard concept to use in determining value. He stated he is attempting to split the difference between the Assessor's recommended value and what Mr. Thornton felt was fair. , UPON A VOICE VOTE T�+,KEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, Councilman Schneider, BOARD OF REViEW MEETING OF APRIL 17, 1989 PAGE 4 Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Mayor Nee voted in favor Qf the motion. Councilman Billings voted against the motion and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote. 4. �_DOWDS, FRIDLEY AUTO SALVAGE. 3737 EAST RIVER ROAD: Mr. Madseri:stated he is recommending a decrease in the estimated market'value from $99,700 to $71,600 for this leased land. He stated he has contacted Mr. Dowds and he is in agreement. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office and reduce the estimated market value on this land from $99,700 to $71,600. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. SKYWOOD MALL. 53RD AND CENTRAL AVENUES: Mr. Madsen stated he would request the Board to reaffirna the value established for this property and staff would continue to work with the property owner on this matter. MOTION by Councilman Billings to reaffirm the estimated market value of $6,343,900 for the Skywood Mall property. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. FRANK WALZ. 160 HARTMAN CIRCLE: Mr. Madsen stated he has been in contact with Mrs. Walz and she is in agreement with the recommendation to reduce the value on this property from $125,800 to $114,300. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office to reduce the estimated market value on this property from $125,800 to $114,300. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. �'RUSTEE GROUP REALTY. 8000 UNIVERSITY AVENUE. 251-71 COMMERCE CIRCLE SOUTH. AND 7151 COMMERCE CIRCLE WEST: Mr. Madsen stated he would recommend the Board reaffirm the value placed on these properties and staff would continue to work with the property owner on this matter. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to reaffirm the estimated market value of $3,498,500 established for these three properties. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. i BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 17 1989 PAGE 5 $� �CC - FRTflT.F.V T.TMTTF.1� PARTNER$HIP. 7685 MAIN STREET. 7260 UNIVERSITY AVENUE AND 7280 COMMERCE CIRCLE EAST: . Mr. Madsen stated he would recommend the Board reaffirm the value placed.on these properties and staff would continue to work with the property�owner-on this matter. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to reaffirm the estimated market value of $3,767,400 established for these three properties. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared tT�e�motion carried unanimously. 9. NORMAN WESTON. 1651 GARDENA AVENUE: Mr. Madsen stated Mr. Weston was unable to attend the meeting this evening: He stated he is recommending a reduction in value for this property from $94,800 to $86,500. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Assessor's Office and reduce the estimated market value for this property from $94,800 to $86,500. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. NEIL WANAMAKER, 265 STONEYBROOK WAY: Mr. Madsen stated his office is in agreement with a letter received from Dave Ryan, realtor with Coldwell-Banker, that the value of this property would be $151,000. He stated it is recommended the value be reduced from $161,200 to $151,000. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendatior► of the Assessor's Office and reduce the estimated market value on this property from $161,200 to $151,000. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. PATRICIA LEVOIR. 6278 BAKER STREET: Mr. Madsen stated this property was inspected and he could find no reason to change the value originally established for the property at $77,100. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to reaffirm the estimated market value placed on this property at $71,100. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. TILFORD AASEN. 6380 JEFERSON STREET: Mr. Madsen stated Mr. Aasen is in agreement with the value BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF APRIL 17. 1989 PAGE 6 originally established for his property at $73,600. MOTION by �Councilman Billings to reaffirm the estimated market value established for this property at $73,600. Seconded by Counci�lma� Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee,�eclared the motion carried unanimously. 13. VANTAGE PROPERTIES, 8150 UNIVERSITY.AVENUE: Mr. Madsen stated a letter was received from Vantage Properties, after the April 10 meeting of the Board of Review, in opposition to the value of this property. Mr. Madsen stated he would recommend the Board affirm the value established for this property and staff would continue to work with the property owner on this matter. MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive the communication from Vantage Properties and reaffirm the estimated market value of $4,974,100 established for this property by the Assessor's Office. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Madsen stated there are two other issues to be resolved, the one for Mr. Sinigaglio's property and the one for Mr. Paulat's property. He suggested this meeting be continued to May l, 1989. Mayor Nee stated he was under the impression that all decisions by this Board had to be completed this evening. He requested that staff contact Mr. Zuk, 721 68th Avenue, and advise him that this meeting has been continued to May 1, 1989. Mayor Nee stated if Mr. Zuk chooses to come back to the Board on May 1, he may do so if he has additional infonaation available. j�Z7ij�lvl�►ii� MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to continue this meeting of the Board of Review to May l, 1989. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the meeting adjourned at 8:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Recording Secretary Approved: William J. Nee Mayor P I THE MINIITES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL CONTINIIED 807�RD OF R8VIE11 I�EETINa OF MAY 1, 1989 THE MINIITES OF TH$ CONTZNUED BOARD OF RFVIEW MEBTING OF MAY 1, 1989 Mayor Nee reopened the Board of Review meeting, which had been continued from April 17, 1989, at 7:40 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billings MEMBERS ABSENT: None Mr. Madsen stated Mr. Zuk, 721 68th Avenue, had been contacted regarding the meeting this evening. He stated Mr. Zuk indicated he would try to obtain additional information for this meeting. Mr. Madsen stated, as of this afternoon, Mr. Zuk had not obtained any additional information and stated he would proceed to the County with his protest. Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated there are two items continued from the last meeting which require action. He stated one involves properties at 4715 and 5191 3rd Street and the other concerns property at 701 Bennett Drive. 1. �iR. JOSEPH SINIGAGLIO, 4715 & 5191 3RD STREET: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated Mr. Sinigaglio came to his office last Friday and this was the first time he had contacted the Assessor's Office since the April 10 Board of Review meeting. Mr. Madsen stated there was no basis to reduce the value of $71,600 for the property at 4715 3rd Street, however, it is recommended the value of the property at 5191 3rd Street be reduced from $100,400 to $97,900. He stated this reduction is based on the fact that values on all duplexes in the City will be lowered due to the market for these types of property. Mr. Madsen stated Mr. Sinigaglio was advised he could continue his protest to the County, as he was on record with the City that he was not in agreement with the values established for his properties. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to affirm the value of $71,600 established for the property at 4715 3rd Street and the value of $97,900 for the property at 5191 3rd Street. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. MR. MARTIN PAULAT. 701 BENNETT DRIVE: Mr. Madsen, City Assessor, stated it is recommended the value of this property be reduced from $79,200 to $78,000. He stated Mr. Paulat is in agreement with this reduction. �ONTINIIED BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING OF MAY 1. 1989 PAGE 2 MOTION by Councilman Schneider established for the property a Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a Nee declared the motion carried ADJOURNMENT: to affirm the value of $78,000 : 701 Bennett Drive. Seconded by voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adjourn the meeting of the Board of Review. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Board of Review meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Recording Secretary Approved: William J. Nee Mayor � � � � i � � THE I��NIITSB OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETIN(i OF lriAY 1, 1989 � THE MINiJTEB OF THE REGULAR MEBTING OF TS$ FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF MAY 1. 1989 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:50 p.m., after the meeting of the Board of Review: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: irlayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billings MEMBERS ABSENT: None PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION: BARRIER AWARENESS DAY - MAY 7, 1989: Mayor Nee issued a proclamation proclaiming May 7, 1989 as Barrier Awareness Day in the City of Fridley and encouraged the efforts of individuals, organizations, and agencies in the City to support those programs and projects that improve the lives of disabled persons. This proclamation was presented to Mr. Jesse Ellingsworth. Mr. Ellingsworth updated the Council on the access guide which is being completed. He stated surveys have been sent to churches to determine if they are barrier free and stated he would encourage residents to make sure their churches are accessible to the handicapped. He thanked the Council for showing consideration for persons with disabilities and for the issuance of this proclamation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, APRIL 17. 1989: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda as�submitted. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1, 1989 PAGE 2 OPEN FO UM VISITORS: Mr. Larry Zimmerman, 5380 4th Street, requested stop signs on 4th and 54th Streets. He stated his wife was involved in an accident Friday while making a left-hand turn into their driveway. He stated there is a lot of speeding which will result in a serious accident if something is not done. MoTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to direct staff to conduct a study in regard to stop signs, as requested by Mr. Zimmerman, and submit a recommendation to the Council. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS• 2. RECEIVING THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 19. 1989• A. CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #89-05. TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF A CHURCH ON LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, BIACK 1. SYLVAN HILLS PLAT 4, THE SAME BEING 6390 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.. BY FRIDLEY COVENANT CHURCH: Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated this church is located in a single family residential zone, therefore, a special use permit is required for any expansion. He stated the proposal is to expand the church by adding a narthex or foyer. Mr. Robertson stated no additional parking is required as there will not be any additional seating. Mr. Robertson stated the Planning Commission has reviewed this request and recommends approval with two stipulations which he outlined. He stated he also concurs and recommends approval of this special use permit. MOTION by Councilman Billings to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP #89-05, with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall install the following landscaping materials: 3- 2 1/2 caliper inch balled and burlapped Burr Oak trees, 40 feet on center, 10 feet from the curb, on the University Avenue side, Bird's Nest Spruce planted 5 feet on center with edging and rock mulch, and an appropriate weed barrier along the eastern and northern parking areas; and (2) the petitioner shall combine the existing tax parcels for the property into one tax parcel. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes �of the Planning Commission meeting of April 19, 1989. Seconded by FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1 1989 PAGE 3 Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. - 3. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING MAY 15. 1989 AS A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR A REZONING ZOA #89-01 TO REZONE THE PROPERTIES DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 2 28 AND 29, BIACK 2. COMMERCE PARK. � FROM C-1 LOCAL BUSINESS TO C-2. GENERAL BUSINESS, THE SAME BEING 240 OSBORNE ROAD N.E.. BY JEROME FARRELL: MOTION by Councilman Billings to set the public hearing for this rezoning, ZOA �89-01, for May 15, 1989. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4. CONSIDERATION OF AN ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND THE GREATER ANOKA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: Mr. Hill, Public Safety Director, stated it is recommended this proposed contract with the Greater Anoka County Humane Society be approved from June 1, 1989 through December 31, 1990 at a cost of $9,974.24 per year and paid in monthly installments of $831.18. Mr. Hill stated in 1986, the City pledged $15,000 or 50 cents per capita for the Humane Society's capital development project, pursuant to Minnesota State Statute 343.11. He stated all other cities in Anoka County also pledged per capita funding, except the City of Anoka who operates their own service. Mr. Hill stated the City of Fridley, unlike all other communities served by the Society, has not had a formal contract with them for services rendered. He stated there was some concern about Fridley recovering their investment and this was discussed with the Executive Director of the Humane Society at the time the $15,000 was pledged. He stated it was agreed to reduce the cost of the City's utilization of the facility and Fridley pays on an animal by animal basis for an average of $70 per month. Mr. Hill stated the intent was for the City to recover some of the capital development pledge. Mr. Hill stated the costs to other cities in Anoka County varies from $225 to $1,083 per month, with smaller communities paying 50 to 62 cents per capita. He stated estimates indicate that the City has recovered their investment through reduced service cost. Mr. Hill stated the Greater Anoka County Humane Society is now at the point where they are requesting approval of contracts with various communities based on a standardized per capita cost. He stated the proposed contract appears to be reasonable and the cost of $9,974.24 is $1,197.76 below what the City paid a, private contractor in 1985 for animal control services. 1�Tr. Hill recommended the City enter into this contract. He stated the City has had no complaints with the Greater Anoka County Humane Society. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1. 1989 PAGE 4 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the Mayoz and City Manager to enter into this contract with the Greater Anoka County Humane Society for services from June 1, 1989 through December 31, 1990 at a cost of $9,974.24 per year. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. RESOLUTION N0. 41-1989 APPROPRIATING MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS TO COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY (C.S.A.H.) - 51ST AVENUE AND EAST RIVER ROAD SIGNAL REVISION PROJECT (S.A.P. 127-020-08): Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this resolution appropriates State Aid Funds for the 51st Avenue and East River Road signal revision project for a sum of $54,000 and requests the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to approve this authorization. Mr. Flora stated it is recommended the contract for this improvement not be awarded until approval is received from the State. He requested the Council consider adoption of this resolution contingent on State approval on the use of the State Aid Funds for this signal project. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 41-1989 appropriating $54,000 from the State Aid Funds towards this signal improvement project and requesting approval from the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation for this appropriation. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO CONTRACT NUMBER 88004 FOR ANOKA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated the County is completing the improvement on East River Road and installing red brick in the median. He stated it was requested that the County extend the red brick to Mississippi Street. Mr. Flora stated the contractor was contacted and the cost to replace the existing median with red brick on East River Road from the north side of Mississippi Street to the Rice Creek Bridge Project is $33,252.87. Mr. Flora stated it is recommended the Council approve the amendment to this agreement to include the installation of the red brick. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the supplemental agreement to Contract Number 88004 with the Anoka County Highway Department in the amount of $33,252.87. Seconded by Cpuncilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee��declared the motion carried unanimously. � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1, 1989 PAGE 5 7. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING AND AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR ,STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1& 2: • MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the following bids for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2: Gammon Bros., Inc. 13845 Northdale Blvd. Rogers, MN 55374 Hardrives, Inc. 7200 Hemlock Lane N. Maple Grove, MN 55369 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 1451 County Road 89 Shakopee, MN 55379 Forest Lake Contracting 14777 Lake Drive Forest Lake, MN 55025 Alber Const. Co., Inc. 4901 W. Medicine Lake Road Plymouth, MN 55446 Midwest Asphalt Corp. P. O. Box 5477 Hopkins, MN 55343 W. B. Miller, Inc. 16765 Nutria St., N.W. Ramsey, 1rIlJ 55303 Alexlander Construction 9050 Jefferson Trail Inver Grove Heights, 1�T 55075 Valley Paving, Inc. 8800 - 13th Ave., East Shakopee, MN 55379 C.S. McCrossan, Inc. P.,O. Box 1240 Maple Grove, MN 55369 $670,628.34 $721,490.41 $726,041.98 $733,804.15 $744,191.65 $744,320.80 $752,686.25 $762,096.13 $774,342.25 $828,678.95 Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Flora stated bids were opened on April 20 for this project which includes improvements on Northco Drive, University Avenue FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1. 1989 PAGE 6 service road, Commerce Lane (73rd Avenue to Osborne Road), and East River Road and 51st Way. . Mr. Flora stated ten bids were received and the low bidder was Gammon Brothers with a bid of $670,628.34. He stated it is recommended the bid be awarded to Gammon Brothers for the -improvements on Northco Drive, University Avenue service road, and Commerce Lane (Phases A, B, C, and E) and authorize the City Manager to execute Phase D(improvements for East River Road and 51st Way), upon receipt of Municipal State Aid Funds. MoTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 to the low bidder, Gammon Brothers for Phases A, B, C, and E of the project in the amount of $424,120.50 and authorize the City Manager to enter into Phase D (East River Road and 51st Way improvements) for $246,507.84, contingent on approval of the use of Municipal State Aid Funds by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation, for a final amount of $670,628.34. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING ADDENDUM PETITION NO. 7-1989 AMENDING COUNCIL TERM OF OFFICE: Ms. Haapala, City Clerk, stated a second petition (No. 7-1989) was received containing 50 signatures. She stated two were not registered voters, one was not acceptable as the name was printed, and 47 were acceptable signatures. Ms. Haapala stated this exceeds the 17 additional signatures required in order to call for a vote on this issue. She stated the total acceptable signatures for the two petitions (Nos. 6-1989 and 7-1989) was 328, and exceeds the 298 needed to call for a vote. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to accept the findings of the City Clerk and receive Petition No. 7-1989. Further, Petitions No. 6- 1989 and 7-1989 are sufficient to call for a vote on the issue of the term of office for City Council members. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8A. RESOLUTION NO. 42-1989 CALLING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION ON AMENDING THE CITY CHARTER. ORDINANCE NO. 919: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 42-1989, calling for a Special Election on Amending the City Charter, Ordinance No. 919 for July 18, 1989. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. . � _ . Councilman Billings stated it would be necessary for tYie Council to meet on July 24, 1989 to canvass the vote. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1, 1989 PAGE 7 9. RESOLUTION NO. 43-1989 AUTIiORIZING AND DIRECTING THE SPLITTING OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON: VANTAGE COMPANIES ADDITION. LOT 1. BLOCK 1• Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated the property was platted in June, -1988 and it is requested the special assessments be split to separate the parcels within the plat for taxation purposes. MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 43-1989. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. �2ESOLUTION NO. 44-1989 TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR MUNICIPAL CENTER DICTATION EOUIPMENT: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated the City is planning to advertise for bids for digital dictation equipment. He stated the digital dictation system will allow the Department Managers to dictate into a system with a hard disk rather than use a separate disk. Councilman Schneider asked if the Council members could use this system. Mr. Burns stated the Council could enter and use the City Manager's system by means of a code. He stated the Police Department will have a separate system which is not accessible. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 44-1989. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR THE MUNICIPAL CENTER TECHNICAL SYSTEM: Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated this change order is to cover the cost of 21 external monitor connections for the Municipal Center in order to locate video monitors in these areas. He'stated there are several options and one would be a"home run" system. He stated with this system, an individual line would be installed to each monitor connection. He stated the media production area would be connected to the external monitors and there would be ZI areas where a monitor could be setup and extend the cable television signal to it. He stated there would be one pcsrtable monitor that could be moved to a particular area. Mr. Hunt stated a person at one of the connections with a television set could take anything that came off the system. He stated if there was a problem with this system, it can be isolated, however, more cable is involved and results in a higher cost. Mr. Hunt stated the cost for this system would be $10,338.00. � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1. 1989 PAGE 8 Mr. Hunt stated another system is a"trunk feed" system which would require less cable. He stated this system involves•.a "filter block" design by which one of the channels is blocked out and made available for in-house transmission of a video signal from the media production area to the external monitor locations. He stated both the "home run" and "trunk feed" systems would supply subscriber cable service to all external monitors. Mr. Hunt stated the cost for this system is about $4,034.00. Mr. Hunt stated there is also a system known as the "A/B trunk feed" . He stated the A channel would carry all the channels by the cable television provider. He stated a monitor with a converter would be able to tune into any channel provided to the Municipal Center by the local cable television company. He stated the B channel would be an internal system and you could put a camera or VCR at any one of the locations and send a signal to all other locations as well. He stated it is like two separate systems and the cost is about $6,332.00. Mr. Hunt stated staff is recommending the "trunk feed" with the filter block. He stated this would enable communications to the external monitors at the least expense, as the cost would be about $4,034.00. Mr. Hunt stated the best bid received for the "home run" system was $10,338.00. He stated with this system, the City would have the capability of sending the cable signal to any of the locations. Councilman Schneider questioned the a need for the cable feed at any of the locations. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated if the Council Chambers was filled to capacity, the signal could be sent to another area. She asked if there was an additional charge by Nortel for each of the jacks. Mr. iiunt stated, in the past, they have not charged the City. He stated at the present time, the City has all the channels. Mr. Burns asked if the filter could be used with the "home run" system. Mr. Hunt stated he believed it could. Councilman Schneider stated even though the "home run" system may not be fully utilized at this time, it does make sense to provide the capabilities for the future. He asked if staff had any objection to the "home run" system. Mr, Hunt stated there was no objection and it was the system recommended by Nortel Cable. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve Change Order,No. 2 for the Municipal Center Technical System with Electrosonic Systems, Inc. to install 21 external video monitor connections using the FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1 1989 PAGE 9 "home run" wiring system in an amount not to exceed $10,338.00. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote,-all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously: 12. CLAIMS• MOTION by Councilman Billings to authorize payment of Claims No. 25915 through 26136. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. LICENSES: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted: Herrick & Newman, P.A. 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 For Services Rendered as City Attorney For the Month of April, 1989 . . . . . . . . $ 2,802.40 Shank Mechanical 3501 - 85th Avenue N. Minneapolis, MN 55443 Repair of Commons Park Filtration Project No. 164 FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6, 570. 00 TKDA 2500 American National Bank Bldg. St. Paul, I�T 55101 Repair of Commons Park Filtration Project No. 164 � FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ l, 225. 00 0 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 1. 1989 PAGE 10 Traut Well, Inc. 151 - 72nd Ave., S. St. Cloud, l�T 56301 Repair & Maintenance of Well Nos. 6, 8, 11 Project No. 186 FINAL ESTIMATE - Well #11. . . . . . . . . . $12,879.50 C. S. McCrossan, Inc. P. O. Box 1240 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Street Improvement Project No. St. 1988 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $22,188.20 Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of May 1, 1989 adjourned at 8:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: � � unroF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: C011/IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM May 10, 1989 �. . William Burns, City Manager �� Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Rezoning Request, ZOA #89-01, 250 Osborne Road N.E., by Jerome Farrell Attached is the staff report for the rezoning request at 250 Osborne Road N.E., from C-1, Local Business, to C-2, General Shopping. The Planning Commission, on a 4-1 vote, recommended denial of the rezonir►g based on the findings that the proposed site plan was an inappropriate utilization of the site; there was only one street frontage for complete access and egress and that cross parking easements off-site across Osborne Road would cause unsafe conditions for pedestrians and traffic. To respond to the Planning Commission's concern, staff is in the process of recording traffic counts along the University Avenue service road and at the service road intersection with Osborne Road. We will present the findings of these counts at Monday's meeting. The petitioner has also received a license agreement to use 50 parking spaces at the Perkins restaurant site. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the rezoning request, ZOA #89-01, subject to approval of the variance request for the parking stall size and the number of parking spaces with the stipulations recommended by the Appeals Commission for cross parking and the site plan stipulations. BD/dn M-89-229 � _ 1A � STAFF REPQRT � APPEALS DATE ��QF PLAI�ING COMMqSSION DATE : May 3, 1989 F[ZIDLEY CITY COUNGL DATE : May 15, 1989 Au7HOR BD�an _ REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES 8� ZONING ��S PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONqVG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ZOA �t 89-01 Jerome Farrell Rezone Lots 1, 2, 28 and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park Add. from C-1, Local Business, to C-2, General Business. 250 Osborne Road N.E. 4.82 acres N/A C-1, Local Business North; C-3 and C-2 commercial uses; South, M-1 and C-I industrial and commercial uses; East, C-2 automotive stati West, M-2 industrial uses. Municipal services are available at the site Required for construction of secondary free standing bldg. None Yes Yes N/A Approval with stipulations l l�� Staff Report ZOA #89-01, Jerome Farrell Page 2 REQUEST The petitioner is requesting rezoning of the site to C-2, General Business, so that the proposed theater becomes a permitted use. The current C-1 zoning permits a theater as a special use permit with a maximum seating capacity of 300 persons. The petitioner proposes to construct a 1,500 seat, eight screen movie theater with approximately 18,744 square feet of retail. A second free standing retail building is proposed at the southeast corner of the site. The existing building on the site will be demolished. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is currently platted as four lots of the Commerce Park Addition. Existing on-site is the 270,000 former CUB Foods building which was constructed in 1968. A portion of the existing parking area encroaches into the 20 foot parking setback from Osborne Road. The City worked with CUB Foods from 1981 to 1985 to upgrade the site to meet City standards. This included screening the loading dock area, providing handicap parking spaces and installing curbing. The landscape improvements requested by the City were not installed. APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION At the April 25, 1989 meeting, the Appeals Commission considered five variances for the site: � 1. Number of required spaces from 384 to 335. 2. Size of parking spaces from 10 feet x 20 feet to 9 feet x 18 feet. 3. A three foot parking lot encroachment alonq the Osborne Road parking lot setback. 4. Reduce the theater setback from 35 feet to 15 feet along Commerce Lane. 5. Reduce the front setback of a free standing building from 35 feet to 20 feet. The Appeals Commission recommended approval of the first four variances and denial of the fifth one. The Commission stated that the 9 feet x 18 feet stalls are adequate, and the maximum amount of parking spaces should be provided on the site. The Commission 1C Staff Report ZOA #89-01, Jerome Farrell Page 3 action also required the petitioner to acquire cross parking easements on adjacent properties to total 384 spaces. The Commission also stipulated approval upon several adjustments to the site plan. These included shifting the driveway onto Commerce Lane to the south, adding landscape islands at the end of the parking aisles in front of the theater and making changes to some of the species in the landscape plan. The petitioner was also required to submit an on-site traffic sign and pavement marking plan, a storm water management plan, a dumpster plan and lighting plan prior to building permit issuance. Finally, the Commission stipulated approval of the variances on the rezoning application and that the petitioner file a plat application to create a separate parcel for the second free standing building by July 1, 1989. The zoning ordinance requires one principal building per lot. REZONING REQUEST In evaluating the rezoning request, the City should evaluate the intent of the proposed district and the compatibility of the proposed uses with existing and adjacent land uses and zoning. The intent of the C-2 district is to provide general business uses. The site is bounded by M-2, Heavy Industrial, on the west across Commerce Lane and Main Street. This area is now vacant. Across Osborne Road to the north is C-2 zoning where the Marquette Bank is located. Bob's Produce is zoned C-3. To the east, the Jet Gas Station parcel is zoned C-2. To the south, the zoning is M-1, Light Industrial, and C-1, Local Business (Perkins). Given this zoning and land use pattern, the intent of the C-2 district is consistent and compatible with other districts and uses in the area. The site has been zoned C-1 since approximately 1967. The area around the site at that time was zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. Given the parcel's location on Osborne Road, which is designated in the City�s comprehensive plan as a minor arterial, and because of its proximity to University Avenue, another minor arterial, the General Business District is more appropriate than the C-1, Local Business district. TRAFFIC The site plan proposes to close the entrance onto Osborne Road and create three driveway entrances on the service road. The driveway south of the free standing building is to be a one-way drive through exit as well as the driveway onto Commerce Lane. The retail area north of the theater is proposed to be a fast food retail area with a drive-through window. The free standing 1D Staff Report ZOA #89-01, Jerome Farrell Page 4 building may also be a fast food restaurant. The Appeals Commission was concerned if the driveway onto Commerce Lane would conflict with the proposed improvements contemplated for Commerce Lane. The Engineering Department confirmed that the driveway location would not interfere with the improvements. A separate right turn lane onto Osborne Road is not proposed. The Commission was also concerned about the stacking distance onto the service road as traffic approaches Osborne Road. While stacking may occur at peak hours, the two full movement driveways will help to disperse the traffic. The Engineering Department recommended that the petitioner consider marking the driveways with one lane in, and two lanes out for right turn movements. The Commission also recommended widening of the one way exit for pass through traffic. PARKING STALIS As to the parking stalls issue, this matter has been presented to the City several times in the last five years. The City has granted variances to stall width from 10 feet 9 to feet for employee parking. A variance to the stall length was granted for the City Center parking ramp from 20 feet to 18 feet. The City currently permits an 18 foot length when the stall abuts a landscaped island or sidewalk along for a two foot overhang. The City has not amended the ordinance in the past to reduce the stall width because of the concern that maneuverability for larger vehicles will be lost and that 9 feet may be too narrow for drivers to get in and out of larger vehicles. Staff contacted other communities regarding their regulations. The majority of other communities have adopted a 9 foot x 18 foot parking stall dimension. The Urban Land Institute and the Institute of Traffic Engineers have also conducted a number of studies which have verified that a 9 foot x 18 foot stall is fully functional and provides adequate maneuverability. Applying the 10 foot x 20 foot stall requirement on this property would mean a 10� reduction in parking stalls. The petitioner has submitted two site plans. One proposes 313 stalls, 157 of which are 10 feet x 18 feet. The other site plan proposes 335 stalls, all at 9 feet x 18 feet. Staff recommends that the City amend the ordinance to permit a 9 foot x 18 foot stall. If the ordinance amendment is not pursued by the City, staff will recommend to the City Counci2 that a variance be granted to permit the 9 foot x 18 foot stalls on this property. If the number of on-site parking spaces is reduced below 335 spaces, an additional demand on the need to create parking off- site to meet ordinance requirements is created, which may mean that Staff Report ZOA #89-01, Jerome Farrell Page 5 1E the site will be substantially under-parked during peak hours. The zoning ordinance requires one parking space for every 100 square feet of theater (259 spaces), and one space for every 150 square feet of retail space (125 spaces). The total required spaces for the proposed uses is 384. The petitioner contends that because the theater will operate primarily in the late afternoon to evening hours, opposite the daytime activities of the retail uses, the parking spaces will be shared. The petitioner indicates that most of the uses are service oriented with short term parkers (video stores, dry cleaners, insurance agency, etc.). Further, some uses such as TCBY will take advantage of the evening theater attendance. The Urban Land Institute conducted a year long parking demand study for theaters located in shopping centers. The peak periods for both retail uses and theater will be Friday evenings and Saturday afternoons during the holiday season, early fall (release of new movies), and early summer (school vacation). The petitioner indicates that the office and service oriented uses will not conflict with the peak demand of the theater uses. Despite the argument for shared spaces, the available on-site parking will not provide for peak hour use if 313 or 335 spaces are provided; therefore, cross parking easements are essential in order that the ordinance requirements are met. GRADING AND DRAINAGE The petitioner is proposing to regrade the site and to resurface the parking lot. Concrete curb will be installed as required by ordinance. A final storm water management plan is required to be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. EXTERIOR APPEARANCE The proposed center is to be constructed of painted score concrete block with a painted rock face concrete block accent stripe. The movie theater will have a metal marquee with neon accent tubes and bulb strips. The retail strip center will have bright red translucent canvas canopies and will have a tenant sign banner above the canopies. A comprehensive sign plan will be submitted. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of rezoning, ZOA #89-01, to rezone Lots 1, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park Addition, from C-1, Local Business, to C-2, General Shopping, subject to the following: 1F Staff Report ZOA #89-01, Jerome Farrell Page 6 1. Approval of the variance request for the number of parking spaces to be 335 spaces on-site, with cross parking easments to provide 384 spaces. 2. Compliance with the site plan stipulations as recommended by the Appeals Commission as follows: a. The driveway onto Commerce Lane is shifted to the south 15 feet. b. The landscape plan shall be amended to provide a 36 inch planting strip along Osborne Road and the University Avenue Service Drive, and to provide columnar arborvitae instead of columnar buckthorn. c. Underground sprinkling shall be installed in the front and side yard setback areas. d. A storm water management plan must be submitted prior to issuance of building permit and must be approved by the Public Works Director. e. A dumpster detail shall be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. f. The petitioner shall submit a lighting plan prior to building permit issuance to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director. g. The rezoning application must be approved by the City Council. h. The petitioner shall file a plat application to create a separate parcel for the second free-standing building by July 1, 1989. i. The petitioner shall submit an on-site traffic sign and pavement marking plan prior to building permit issuance. The one way exits shall be clearly marked on the site. k. The site plan shall be revised to include landscape islands on the east end of the three interior parking aisles. Staff also recommends the Planning Commission consider recommending that the City Council amend the size of a parking stall to 9 feet x 18 feet. 1G Staff Report ZOA #89-01, Jerome Farrell Page 7 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission recommended denial of the rezoning request based on the findings that the proposed site plan was an overutilization of the site; there was only one street frontage for complete access and egress and that cross parking easements off- site across Osborne Road would cause unsafe conditions for pedestrians and traffic. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff maintains its original recommendation of approval of the rezoning request as stated on pages 5 and 6 of the staff report. We are currently recording traffic counts along the University Avenue service road and at the intersection of the service road and Osborne Road. We will present the findings of the traffic counts on Monday evening. Further, Anoka County has advised staff that it would prefer that the existing driveway cut onto Osborne Road be closed and that there be no access onto Osborne Road. We will be receiving information from the County on Monday on the procedures for creating a cross walk on Osborne. The petitioner has received a license agreement to use 50 parking spaces on the Perkins restaurant site. This lessens the need for a cross walk across Osborne Road, yet we recommend that the cross parking arrangements be maintained for overflow parking during peak periods. ZOA 4189-01 Jerome Farrell 1 H i N !/2 SEC. ��TY of II � v KIR' G�7MNEA .,S[C //� �... ...�. _ �" � � _ � �"—�--�bll ... � �, / ' , ,�'�� . N _ EASfRAAICH%.�: , , �II .r � � : EAST RIJNCH £srarES �r: ; se� �. f '; ';� ,. �r �„ � � �: ,��r�E %E.�!' M� F/RSR•) �' (• � ' � � - �'. d+ Nl,� � • �M N , �� i „ '� jf s N TH/R ADQ M ' Ao �� ' � . , � __- �� , � ' o BO E � • ' � i 4i - ` � � (� N' (y k �; , . l��/ �� I` n�a .,� . �(+� C! 4� � � . '� i ' r'" � I ✓ - � ` ��] � i // � , / � d `+ � �„ , . _•� .� .,, i :.»f- ,,,�., •.;. TM ee►E. �,�, � _. �- . � ; � �' , .. � �a t� /iy� :� �. N r �,. %D ��il /�1 'V�� liJOOI t Ii►, �i}7 "� j � • V •' i 1 �� 11�1 l�� .�� / �� nV ^ � i ' i ! M � K + �� / NSOI /:p/ ' � 1 1 V / ! �+� 5 . � j ' � <.J � (or,noi"� _ �a rrW pr _ � Z ;' I P, N� ��/ ' i�iw�i i �.; ' h�nwi � l�, Y N�� 1�a ui / �i�cv� ' , ; °�' . � r N �'� I - i`i � � i �-. atiy' ��s sW r� Inocl I � � � � � 1 ,G � ��'N �t t/!A CN �I 7�� i � � ..�T'.L . G+1 l') /tJ01 � { i i � f. !�lJOJ i � j t MM i�u r �N'• � �o I i.s� � x tl� ()Iwnl � � � is!'� nM, V(Ylr .; �:10 n ^ IMOI , ' �'• / \ !� q nsv/ a � t:.' i l��o`Jt 1 � � i r — � - ' �i�`'' y �, f � � , . , �7 �� .! . -- � nsooi � _ • =i1i . � �: ?s �.. :lr �__J -�v� �� T_____�__�' •! .�lMOI ~ j C • .6'J. .-.4..'�_`.. _� « ,�, � I R � pA w . , . I � (i �,� � /�.lJO!` Oa / � .� ��n; ti - k �, I�SOJ � " oc i N �� . , 9 I t ` ' �� ^ (� . � t/ 'I r� i�N ' ll . I + 4r, . �i:� u:sc� � raoa� � W `� < + � ,, � „ r, � n,�, ` : � ��.�� ELO Y �� ;�; ,., � . .� ;� � ,�S s � ► rc �i ! -, :.lJJO/ � fW/1 '!4i rf 9. 6 � N�: ry. i ; ",�' ---'� -=�� an� �vEwue K�: :w,73 z 4 � � a -:,v� -- .e:�. �; :rrsonJ c*� 6cJZ (c.� �:....� "zs C y„ • r� .. �� -. � � � s � � f � �y e � : ii �' �J , +acsoi r •�� ' s W .- • � � .; ' � W ///!01 ! � �j: � ;�.., � . . �,: p. ,Y ` �, � , IT ✓ f I Z; u � si�ib.� �: .: + a� t .vls0ol � v� .I • Q . ` J I I V S3�!' i.1�. � r:tr` ♦.* : �� •b t^ . I (, •..�' I `9 •/ � r � :a: � l��w r` �„ ' I!l�Ol K. I� .'Ii/li0/ . I � ��"�w +•'�P M'1 : � � � 7 t ' I � ncaol c � �. � � � �� r—' ; � � ��' M,:i. � �„ 6 ,/ �� a �� ' 2, � u � 'ri.ocl e„ � • � � ,6 : I ; ,s ..,.,,, = T , . ,. � - : , ; I � .... w r i�.y;. �,f�� s f i � M �� r! I � � . ,V, f `� Iar) • • //0001 /fSOJ r � q � � ( t .�Y' � ~ � � �� ,• f � i � � B. � �7 ,p ; � l0 ' f• T; � I �� ny2.�N6'�i �jelN ��4'.y� :AK lr�= �� I O i,.; , i `�� r� p�e �r� ,l! �. � s �w , ; 0» I � liR70/ Ni �� -� �r !MJlO/ ay 9 ' � ,! �C , : /S � �y ! � I 1 /f30/ Ilpp� � � � 4 � , h. I n N "/A�fY � ` �,,•�'p) � d I��'j 1��•� _ �/� +'I - M� •'�',�! :i ' t" ti, f' y� �� 'ai � (wy1 _"'r.? 'T3R� AVE. rinr. q, :M _ I �� - SEt. u � �� ' 24 23 LOCATION MAP ZOA 4�89-01 Jerome Farrell 1� , _ - -- � � J aH0l13�IAl17S ' / � ��---------� -d, � /�' J ` _ •. .� . y Y / / /� � �'yf' , L." W / � , ' r � � N `� � l!: �� . zz •/ %/'/� � �' � Y � � / �' � � � � � ' - '..-. : �� ' •' '% '�'�' �(��:�.��;� ; � ,- r . N� i�� / 1� �� . � ' /� . \ , i i C.[_1J ' , \ _ _ - � '//�i� � /�,/// �N (-I- I---I �--I •-I I � . _ / . / ..�I I ( � ! I f ` ' � �' � � ! � �/ ,%� \; < � ! - ---- _ _._� , ' �� /, - - - . ... . -- ^, .�� n^ ' - -- - �� `• � ` . � � `, \ � �.�• � R , ,•, . ---• . � � m: `� � � • i� , . +,-. � � ' %_/ � �� s � • �,i , , � 1 ✓ '�, ` ' \, �i�' ` '` \ 1 G 1 � � 1 ' �t 4 `}, � ' 1 � � i � , , \ , � ' \, �� \, ) � , � i � ; , . � \ � ' ' I'� � �, � � !� (, Y V ,� � mw �N � z? YO a� N �ti , r� 1 , , � ✓��_ ^' 1 �.' � '; � ��- �; i = i, � �� '� � � �: •��i a �� i � � ii � ,= -1' �" _ --- .- i � r �-`., ' � � ��' � � =� � .�=, _�� - . � ��/ �� -� � � � , � �- � ` � � � � �' / � � �' � = �' ` � '� \ �, '\ �� , \� �, 1 � „ \�i� 1' � ` ` ` , ' � � � � Y >Q O � N / � 1 , ., � , � �;/ `� - 1, � � � .��, / �� N ,•'� '— %i-� 1•?� � �'�1-- �. ,'` 0�1 ��/ + /�\ \ �. / �� / ` ` C I i �i �J i i � `�� i i -a"1 i r-_ � / 4 ;�„ / L / � �� - � a J� � �i e ��/ �' / n � .i_ �� ,� ,-- , % � �� -�„ �� N <m W� �� N ,� � � � � � i_ � ^� .. . Y J �... ��,,� Q — �i --- �I �, u �n :I p i' � � _ Q LL — 1 p5„ � � ! W N 1 ' '� c� - ji z p -- � �� LL � G � Nj 'I in � " N I � � i �._ i �l \ ' I' �� .,J � / - _ ,d� Y i � �� / UQ tYj � � ' } � mm / �� / N N � � t7 � i � „ . b � � 3z L�a , m$ O � � , � . � : � / u�i a � t!> . . � �� ' 4 � � � � C � � � � a W � V T * Z F C� � Z W N Z t o � +r w '3 r w a -� C �¢ � a u. a zI � o� �; _ a� J �� l ,.� S ITE PLA N � � � � � � � � � e�x�� "�`A e � ��a3�a �W�� ;��-,��t � nl��:fo \ \ 1 \ � i � �_ �� r � �� l � \ \ � , � , ,- \ , : , \., � \ '` � � � , � , _ \' , \ 4 . \ \ i 1 \ �1 ' � �s s / �a � �� `L X 1 l � ZOA �089—OI Jerome Farre . � /�� . �� ,��,d�r--a— / � i /� '// � ' I , � , � �/ �'" ' /� � Q�q � � �� 0 /� �• r ��' �11 _ i YY �1 �/ / ,�� /� , , i'. � s� ,• �_ . ` :•''�� E � � � r N �! L � a co T * � r � C � � T * � � � � � ` �� ++ � x � �E � � ��;� � r-� •C ��a� � � �� b - � W � -� �4��- � � ��&� 1J SITE PLAN zoa ��s9-oi 1K Jerome Farrell � J p � 7 �g : rd� WO�c� � �� / �i OY )�111Y7t�d� :'��' � ��R� // � � � :��, .�� ,,, �� $�� , ` �y�. �/ + r � :�t`' �� `�• o �� a �i `�� /t . R�r ' , / � / � // ' o• o �\ . ., g � �- ,,� ! : �,� + _� � , � \� ,� , \. ,\, \� � ��, ` ' •f \\ , � \ � _ `` \ ' • ` \• � � . \ � \ � \ \ \ � � �1�• . � • b� �� LANDSCAPE P�A N i :` :` ,1 \ :` :` :` :` '` 1 � � �` :` �` . �. �- `.�� _.._ _...- -� � ✓� i _._—�� `.- � ` � ZOA 4�89-01 Jerome Farrell 1 L ,�.•� � ,_ ._.._.._.._ �" �' —�—�—�—�— /,. �.•/ r.►- ' . �.. / � I 'C ; ,� �-'�',/ • ��,�. GRADING PLAN _' � � _. _ - - -1 � : � . , . _: _, 7' � �� -, � 7� � �' --. 7' , , , , _, , , : . . _, 7' . , �' . , .� . < -, a ,� 7' . ,g ], �, ._: � _, 7' , . �' �� ti � s. �' . � . � . �. _ ZOA l�89-01 1M Jerome Farrell � . � � � � � . FLOOR PLAN r� x� �� a� r• I I I � rY M� t , .. M� �� r� �g . � ZOA 4689-01 Jerome Farrell �� ..� " 'u rY �� _ r� �� -- �----� Y �4 *AI �q� e� ' II��' � i � � ; o� 9 o. � 8¢ �� . � � 1N FLODR P��►n� ZOA 4�89-01 Jerome Farrell 1 O FLOOR PLAN �� }� � . ��? ! � i i , � � t} ��3 �t� F � � � ZOA ��89-01 Jerome Farrell 1P i� � � � � � � ELEVATION Communitv 1. Blaine 2. Burnsville 3. Coon Rapids 4. Eden Prairie 5. Edina 6. Hopkins 7. Lakeville 8. Maple Grove 9. Plymouth 10. St. Louis Par 11. New Brighton 12. Columbia Hts. 13. Brooklyn Par 14. Minnetonka 15. Robbinsdale 16. Edina PARKING STALL SIZE SUMMARY Re�. Stall Size Aisle 90� Anale 9 x 20 24 ft. 9 x 18 -- 9 x 18 24 ft. 9 x 19 25 ft. 8.5 x 18 24 ft. 9 x 20 -- 8.5 x 20 9 x 18 9 x 18.5 k 9 x 20 9 x 18 9 x 20 k 10 x 18 (retail) 9 x 18 (other uses) 8.5 x 18 8.5 X 18 9 x 18 � 26 ft. 24 ft. 25 ft. 26 ft. 25 ft. Compact Stall Size 8.5 x 18 8 x 16 8 x 16 7.5 x 16 8 x 16 9 x 18 7.5 x 15 r� � 7.5 x 16 1Q t,�r:. PARKII� ST�I�, SURVEY MAY 27, 1986 • ... • s�t, w�vrx r�nards Skywood Inn t'r�ore La}:e Beach Fridle� Liquor Annex Hayes School Fridley Li.brary Fr idl e1� Civ ic Center Black Forest Apartments US SWim & Fitness . r,inncast Frito-Lay BeF:ins A;oving Frinley Sr. High School FrialEy Plaza Clinic CaLle Television Z�.rget Store r;oon Plaza Grace Luth Ct�urch I�erned�� Transnission Learning Tree Pickr� ick Books Sky�rood N,all 2kin City Federal Shor�aooci Irui Sears St�orewocx� Plaza t�:��le Lanes P��le Lane A�artment Fridley State Bank �'illage Green Apartment Z�rget Off ice Bldg Grace High School P'�ectronic Unan Corp C�rter Day Paco Bldg Yaco 5iag t•;eadowrun A�rtrnents F:iver Road A�rtment E. River Rd Bus. Center A;idwest t;achine Pride tSachine C�b Building Bob's Produce �bwn Crier Restaurant T. R McCoy' s Paco Blag Paco Ottice Bldg Uniteci Store Paco Bldg. Sandee's Restaurant Larson Fi�g. St. �tiilliams Church Herrick Ortice Bldg t•;incc� �Ltino's 5351 Central Avenue 5201 Central Avenue 5874 Central Avenue 6289 Highway #65 615 N.ississippi St 401 rli ssissippi st 6431 University Avenue 1601 North Innsbruck Dr 7200 University Avenue 200 Co�uneroe Cir. So. 7180 Conuneroe Cir. W. 7580 Conunerce Lane 6100 West N,00re Lake Dr 6341 University Avenue 350 - 63rd Avenue 755 - 53rd Avenue 6225 University Avenue 460 - 75th Ave 8. 7700 University Ave 5310 r;adison Street 765 - 53rd Avenue 5363 Central Avenue 5205 Central Avenue 6161 Highway #65 6199 Highway #65 6225 Higt�way �65 6310 Highway #65 6379 Higtnaay #65 6315 University Ave 460 Mississi�pi St 6499 University Ave 1350 Gardena Avenue 6970 Central Avenue 1500 - 73rd Avenue 500 - 73rd Avenue 7151 Carunerce Cir. W. 251 Conun�rce Cir. So. 7805 Eost River Rd 6540-50 East River Rd 53 Ol Fast River Rd 230 Corrunerce Cir. So. 7220 Ca�unerce Cir. W. 250 Osborne Road 7620 University Ave 7730 University Ave 7850 University Ave 7280 Catunerce Cir E 7260 University Avenue 785 - 53rd Avenue 7281 Canm►eroe Cir W 6490 Central Ave 7421 Catu�erce Lane 6151 University Ave 6279 University Ave 73Q0 Ccx�unerce Lane 7350 Coimnerce Lane � 9, 9 9, 9 �� lo ��r 14 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 �EET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 1/2 & 10 FEET 9 1/2 FEET 9 1/2 FEET 1/2 & 10 FEET 1/2 & 10 FEET 9&lOFEET 9.1 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET � 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 1/2 & 9 FEET 8 1/2 FEET Not Marked Not t�arked Not Narkeci Not rarked 1R CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------- CALL TO ORDER• Vice-Chairperson Kondrick called the May 3, 1989, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Alex Barna, Paul Dahlberg Members Absent: Don Betzold Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Amin Kadir, 1401 Gardena Ave. N.E. Pat Dowd, Target Tom Whisenhunt, Target Raquel Rudquist, 2322 Seabury Ave. S., Mpls. Charles Wood, 23675 Xanadu Ave., Jordan Jerome Farrell, 2908 Jersey Ave. N., Crystal (See attached list) APPROVAL OF APRIL 19. 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to approve the April 19, 1989, Planning Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. l. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #89-06, BY ISLAMIC CENTER OF MINNESOTA: Per Section 205.07.O1.C(4) of the Fridley City Code to operate a daycare center for 35 children in Rooms 102, 104, and 106 of the Islamic Center, on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 17 and 33, Meloland Gardens, the same being 1401 Gardena Avenue N.E. MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to open the public hearing on SP #$9-06. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE POBLIC $EARING OPEN AT 7:34 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated she is pleased to announce that Michele McPherson has been hired as the new Planning Assistant. She stated Michele 2A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 3, 1989 _ PAGE 2 has been employed by the City for about 1 and 1/2 years as the Landscape Intern, and they are very happy to have her employed in her new position. She stated Ms. McPherson would be presenting the staff report on this item. Ms . McPherson stated the special use permit is for a daycare center at the Islamic Center of Minnesota (formerly Faith Academy) located at 1401 Gardena Avenue. She stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family District. A daycare is allowed in an R-1 district with a special use permit. Ms. McPherson stated the building must meet code for F-3 occupancy which will require the installation of fire alarms in each room and in the hallway adjacent to the daycare rooms. There must be an exterior exit from each of the rooms and to the outside from one of the rooms for fire escape purposes. Ms. McPherson stated the State Daycare Regulations require an outside enclosed play area. The hours of operation will be from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Ms. McPherson stated staff is concerned about a conflict with traffic from Totino Grace during the school year. There should not be as much conflict during the summer months when Totino Grade is not in session. Staff is proposing the Isla�aic Center expand their current parking area to allow a turn-around situation to allow parents to drive in, drop off their children, and exit easily. This would prevent drop-off conflicts on Gardena Avenue. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of SP #89-06 by the Islamic Center of Minnesota to allow the operation of a daycare for no more than 35 children at the Islamic Center, Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. with the following stipulations: 1. All drop-off and pick-up of children shall occur on the premises. 2. The daycare hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3. The building shall meet the requirements of the State Daycare Regulations, the Building.Code, and the Uniform Fire Code, including the following: a. An enclosed outdoor play area adjacent to the facility b. outside exits from the daycare rooms c. fire alarms in each daycare room and in the hallway outside the daycare rooms � PLANNTNG COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 3 4. The Islamic Center shall modify the parking lot as illustrated on the modified site plan. 5. The petitioners shall complete stipulations #1, #2, #5, and #7 from SP #88-17. Ms. McPherson stated stipulation #5 refers to stipulations 1, 2, 5, and 7 from SP #88-17 which required parking lot improvements, a dumpster screen, combination of all the individual lots into one tax parcel, and maintenance of the weeds. Mr. Amin Kadir, Director of the Islamic Center at 1401 Gardena Avenue, stated this would be a non-religious daycare center which will service the Islamic community as well as the Fridley community. He stated they have been working with the Building Inspector, Darrel Clark, and the Fire Chief, Bob Aldrich, and they will meet all the City's requirements. Mr. Kadir stated that regarding the parking lot, with 35 children arriving over a period of two hours in the morning, that is about one child arriving every 4-5 minutes. He stated right now the parking lot is not being used to its capacity during the day Monday through Friday, especially in the morning. They would like to reach a compromise where they can designate some parking for the sole purpose of dropping off children. The expansion of the parking lot is more of a financial obligation than they are able to meet right now. Ms. Pam Porchniak, 7305 Van Buren Street N.E., stated she takes her child to a daycare center, and all the parents arrive at once. Even though the daycare center has a large parking lot, it is always full. The Islamic Center might want to take this into consideratior►, as they might have some very angry parents if there is not enough room in the parking lot. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERBON RONDRICR DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:45 P.M. Ms. Sherek stated she agreed with Ms. Porchniak. She would be opposed to anything �that will limit the traffic flow for turn- around purposes. What they might find is some parents, rather than fight the traffic into the parking area, will pull in, drop of their children, and then back out onto Gardena Avenue during the busy traffic times. Mr. Dahlberg stated parents might also park on Gardena to drop off their children, and that situation should definitely be avoided. zc PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 4 Mr. Dahlberg stated that with the diagonal parking arrangement, the Center will lose some parking spaces. Mr. Kadir had indicated the lot is not used at its capacity during the week. However, on the weekends when they have their activities at the Center, they might have to rely on Totino Grace's lot more. Is that going to cause any difficult for the Center? Mr. Kadir stated the daycare operation is Monday through Friday, and most of the activities for the Islamic Center are on the weekends. The parking spaces will only be reduced by 2-3 spaces, and he did not think that would be a great change. Mr. Saba stated he agreed Ms. Sherek, and they should keep stipulation #4 about the parking. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City Council approval of Special Use Permit, SP #89-06, by the Islamic Center of Minnesota per Section 205.07.O1.C(4) of the Fridley City Code to operate a daycare center for 35 children in Rooms 102, 104, and 106 of the Islamic Center, on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 17 and 33, Meloland Gardens, the same being 1401 Gardena Avenue N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. All drop-off and pick-up of children shall occur on the premises. 2. The daycare hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3. The building shall meet the requirements of the State Daycare Regulations, the Building Code, and the Uniform Fire Code, including the following: a. An enclosed outdoor play area adjacent to the facility b. outside exits from the daycare rooms c. fire alarms in each daycare room and in the hallway outside the daycare rooms 4. The Islamic Center shall modify the parking lot as illustrated on the modified site plan. 5. The petitioners shall complete stipulations #2, #2, #5, and #7 from SP #8$-17 as follows: a. (#1) A masonry dumpster enclosure with wooden gates shall be installed by August 1, 1989. b. (#2) The property owner shall combine individual lots into one tax parcel, as requested by the City �1 �J PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 __ _ PAGE 5 Assessor (buildable lots abutting Hillcrest Drive and Oakwood Manor shall be exempted). c. (#5) All existing hardsurface areas shall be improved with sealcoating, curb and gutter and striping by August 1, 1989. d. (#7) The property owner shall take care of the weed problem by August 1, 1989. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPER$ON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Mr. Kondrick stated this item will go to City Council on May 15. 2. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #87-05 TARGET NORTHERN DISTRIBUTION CENTER ADDITION,__BY TARGET STORES INC.: To create two lots by replatting Outlot 1, Block 1, Fridley Industrial Park Plat l, Anoka County, Minnesota, together with the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, excepting the west 675 feet thereof, including that portion of Able Street vacated or to be vacated included in said North Half of the Southeast Quarter, generally located at 1090 - 73rd Avenue N.E. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER60N RONDRICR DECLARED T�iE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMODSLY AND THE PIIBLIC BEARING OPEN AT 7:55 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the property is located west of Highway 65, north of Locke Park, and south of 73rd Avenue. The property is zoned M- 2, Heavy Industrial. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is requesting to plat its 76-acre property into two parcels. The eastern lot will contain the existing Target facility, and the western lot will contain the proposed warehouse expansion. Ms. Dacy stated that in 1984 when Target was contemplating this building expansion, they applied for a vacation to vacate Able Street. In order to vacate the right-of-way, Council conditioned their approval upon Target entering into a street relocation agreement to relocate Able Street to provide access to Locke Park and construct a building. At that time, the current access to Locke Park was not constructed. In the lapse of time between 1984 and the present, the County constructed the current entrance. 2E PLANNING COMMIBSION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 6 There is now no longer a need for a street entrance into Locke Park; however, the City still wants to maintain a bikeway/walkway access into the park. Ms. Dacy stated in 1987, the petitioner completed an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) process with the City. The City Council approved the EAW in August 1987. Through that EAW process, it was noted that the wetland area located approximately in the center of the property was subject to the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers. The petitioner subsequently found out they had to revise their site plan and receive an Army Corps of Engineers' permit. The result of their work with the Army Corps is to actually move the parking area out of the wetland area to preserve it and recreate a wetland area in the area where the original building expansion was to be located. The revised site plan, in conformance with the Army Corps, relocates the parking area further to the west and on the western side of the building. Ms. Dacy stated the item being acted on at this meeting is for a preliminary plat to divide the total acreage into two lots with the new lot line being moved 33 feet to the east from the easterly right-of-way line of Able Street. So, the current building exists on Lot 1 and the proposed building will extend into Lot 2. The proposed site plan locates the proposed building less than ten feet from the existing building. City ordinance requires a 20 foot side yard between the lot line and the building. However, the ordinance also states that no side yard is required if a common wall is provided between the two buildings which meet the requirements oF the building code. If the buildings are separated, the building code requires 120 feet of separation. This issue should be resolved prior to final plat consideration by the City Council, and the site plan and plat amended accordingly. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is requesting to relocate the bikeway/walkway access along the west Zot line and meander it through the two detention ponds on the northwest corner of the site, connecting it to the proposed bikeway/walkway along the south side of 73rd Avenue. Ms. Dacy stated that regarding the grading and drainage issues, the proposed building is 82,075 sq. ft. which is larger than the 1987 proposal. However, the overall impervious surface for building a parking area has only increased by 1.7�. The entire runoff from the site will be directed into two detention ponds in the northwest corner of the site. The wetland area will remain as is and a wetland area will be recreated in the center of the site. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner conducted a neighborhood meeting, and some traffic concerns were raised by the neighbors. The City has plans for the improvement of 73rd Avenue in 1991 from two lanes to four lanes. The improvement plan shows an expansion of the 2F PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 PAGE ? pavement to the south side (Target side) by 10 feet. There will be no alteration of the existing frontage road or the existing north side of 73rd Avenue. The City can complete the pavement expansion and curbing within the current right-of-way; however, the proposed bikeway/walkway will have to be constructed in an easement which staff is recommending be reserved on the Target property. That will necessitate the removal of some brush and smaller trees along 73rd Avenue; however, there a 200 ft. setback will still be maintained from the right-of-way to the edge of the proposed parking area. Trees will be removed to recreate the wetland in the center of the site; however, a 100 ft. setback will be maintained from the new recreated wetland to the south right-of-way line. The buffer of existing trees will remain. Ms . Dacy stated the neighbors were concerned about the new entrance onto 73rd Avenue opposite Jackson Street. The petitioner has indicated this entrance will be used only as an emergency entrance if the current access from the Highway 65 service road is picketed or if there is a strike. Staff is recommending as a stipulation that this entrance be used only in an emergency situation. This new entrance is opposite the Jackson Avenue intersection on the north side, and the neighbors were concerned about the direct view looking south from Jackson. The petitioner has indicated to staff that they are revising the landscaping plan to provide a planting screen to block the view into the property and they will replace trees that are lost due to the construction of the entrance. Ms. Dacy stated employees and truck traffic wi11 increase as a result of the proposed expansion. There will be 530 employees entering and leaving the site. Truck traffic is expected to increase from 160-180 trucks per day to an estimated 220 trucks per day using the Highway 65 entrance. The increase in traffic from the employee access should not adversely affect the traveling capacity of 73rd Avenue. Ms. Dacy stated three building expansions are proposed. The major one totals approx. 570,000 sq. ft., another expansion onto that to the west of 86,000 sq. ft., and a 91,000 sq. ft. expansion on the northeast corner. The petitioner has provided adequate parking spaces to meet the code requirements for warehouse and office purposes. � Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat, PS #87-05, with the following stipulations: 1. The lot line shall be located between the two parcels, such that either the required setback is maintained between the lot line and building, or the proposed expansion is connected to the existing building by a common wall. The petitioner shall revise the site plan 2G PLANNZNG COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 3, 1989 ' PAGE_8 2. 3. and preliminary plat prior to final plat consideration by the City Council. The petitioner shall receive approval from the Army Corps of Engineers and the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to grading the site. The petitior►er shall submit a landscape plan prior to bui2ding permit issuance. 4. The petitioner easement along connect to the construction p: the City. 5. 6. shall convey a 15 foot bikeway/walkway 73rd Avenue and along the alignment to 73rd Avenue easement. A bikeway/walkway an shall also be submitted for review by Truck/trailer access shall be limited to the entrance on the Central Avenue Service Road, except i� strike or emergency situations, where the entrance west of Able Street may be used temporarily. A special use permit application must be filed for exterior storage on the property. Mr. Barna recommended that the word "strike" be deleted in stipulation #5. Mr. Pat Dowd, Target Project Manager for Construction, introduced Tom Whisenhunt, Director of the Project for Distribution who represents the Distribution Center people; Raquel Rudquist, the Project Architect; Naeem Qureshi, Civil Engineer; and Chuck Woods, the Landscape Architect. Mr. Dowd stated Target has been a member of Fridley for 20+ years. Originally, Fridley was the Target headquarters for the entire country. In Fridley, Target employs the most people than any of the other cities around the country where they have stores or companies, with the possible exception of Los Angeles. Currently, the existing distribution services a five-state area in Western Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, North and South Dakota. Expansion of the center has been contemplated since the early 1980's, but to date, it was put off due to canstructing facilities in other states. They are really now operating out of five warehousing situations in the Midwest--Plymouth, Mendota Heights, Bloomington, DesMoines, and Fridley. They are now in the position where they have to get into another warehouse base yet this year in order to continue to operate. In order to service the stores in this five state area, they need to consolidate under one roof, and that is the reason for the replat petition. 2H PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 9 Mr. Dowd stated they had brought along some boards and drawings which might explain some of the traffic issues, the scope of the project, etc. Ms. Rudquist showed the landscaping plan. She stated there was some concern from the neighbors about screening the view of the parking area from Jackson Street, and they have located some landscaping in that area to reflect that concern. Mr. Barna stated he is concerned about the appearance of the south side of the building. A 35 ft. block wall is not very pretty to those viewing it from the park side. Mr. Woods stated they will have plantings along that area and will do what they can to soften that side of the building. They will be using a combination of shrubs, flowering materials, and some vines. Mr. Barna stated he would like to see some definite plans to break up the visual impact of that large building. Mr. Whisenhunt stated they will have to maintain a fire lane down the south side of the building. There are a�so some tall unsightly power poles taller than the building, and access must be maintained to those. So, while taZl plantings might sound attractive, he did not know how they would work in with the above factors. Mr. Dahlberg asked why the plat was being requested, why the division into two plats? His reason for asking was that if the buildings are connected, then it is still a part of the primary building on the site, so, technically, there might not be the need to plat it into two parcels. Mr. Whisenhunt stated he thought the issue was that when they drew the building and drew the expansion, they drew out a concept showing the two buildings standing off because they did not know the footings. That 10 feet might have mislead the engineers into thinking that they physically wanted to separate the building. He believed Mr. Dahlberg is correct in that one large plat is really what they want. Mr. Dahlberg stated the combining of the two parcels with the vacation of the street and the property that is gained by the vacation into one large piece of property seems to make the most sense. Ms. Rudquist stated this would certainly be preferable to them. Ms. Dacy agreed. She stated the combination might be the way to go; however up until this point, she did not think staff had PLANNING COMM288ION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 10 received a clear indication as to whether or not the buildings were going to be attached. Mr. Dahlberg stated this should be resolved prior to the City Council meeting. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission can approve the replat as one or two lots. There would be no changes in the stipulations, except stipulation #l. Ms. Sherek stated she has a concern about the truck egress from the Target plant. She stated she lives across Highway 65 and she almost gets run over every morning about 7:00 a.m. by trucks on 73rd Avenue. She is curious to know if Target representatives have any way of controlling the truck traffic to use Highway 65 to Highway 10 or I-694 to 35-W instead of 73rd Avenue to 35-W. While 73rd Avenue is rated for that type of truck, when 73rd Avenue enters Moundsview, it becomes more of a residential street. The truck traffic is causing problems for the neighborhood and it is not appropriate. Mr. Whisenhunt stated Target certainly has a good relationship with their carriers, and he would be glad to address this concern with the managements. Mr. Keith Bellefeuille, 7310 Jackson Street N.E., stated his concern is not only for the view from Jackson Street, but also for the safety. He has lived here 10 years and has seen a lot of accidents on 73rd Avenue. He would propose moving the entrance to the parking lot as far west as possible. Mr. Bellefeuille stated he would like to know what "emergency" means and when they might expect that entrance to be used by trucks, how often, and what control the City or anyone else has over that. Mr. Bellefeuille stated he would like to see the south side of the building made of glass walls as opposed to block walls. Glass walls seem to take on the color and light of its surroundings and would make the building more "park-like". Mr. Whisenhunt stated the entrance on 73rd and Jackson which was shown as proposed secondary truck entrance was changed after the neighborhood meeting. They are now saying they will maintain the existing secondary access close to Central Avenue, but the only traffic going in and out of the entrance at 73rd & Jackson is vehicular traffic to service the small building, and that entrance will be heavily landscaped. i 21 2J PLANNING COMMIS$ION MEETING. MAY 3. 1989 PAGE 11 Mr. Dowd stated the entire truck circulation and trailer parking area is a secured area, fenced in its entirety, and enters and exits at one location with a guard at Highway 65. Mr. Qureshi stated they are essentially extending the wetland area. The Army Corps of Engineers wants them to compensate for the wetland area lost for construction. There will be no change in drainage in this area. They are creating another wetland or pond so that all the water that comes off the parking Zot and building will go into the pond, then spi11 over into the existing pond, then an outlet from the existing pond will go into the storm sewer on 73rd Avenue. The amount of runoff that is going to be allowed to leave the site has to be maintained at its present condition. Any excess water that will occur because of added paved area will have to be stored in this pond, and that is the primary reason for adding a pond. They are not changing the pattern or amount of runoff from what is leaving the site now. Ms. Rudquist stated that regarding Mr. Bellefeuille's suggestion of a glass wall on the south side, they could make a presentation of their ideas for the design of the south wall at the Council meeting. Ms. Pam Porchniak, 7305 Van Buren Street N.E., stated the questions regarding whether the entrance across from Jackson Street would be used during a strike and what constitutes an emergency had not been answered. Mr. Whisenhunt stated any entrance is a"strikable" entrance; however, he could not imagine anyone wasting time on the 73rd/Jackson entrance. The primary entrance is off Highway 65. He would suggest stipulation #5 be deleted in its entirety. Once they decided to keep their secondary entrance as it exists, then this entrance became very minor. Ms. Porchniak asked how the fencing would be landscaped. Mr: Woods stated they intend to have lower scale plantings along 73rd Avenue to help screen the fencing, and they will have some ivy plantings on the fence to soften the view. Mr. Bob Lange, 189 Logan Parkway, stated he is also concerned about the drainage. Mr. Qureshi again stated that this development will not change the amount of water leaving the site any more than it is now in its undeveloped state. Mr. Dick Pearson, 7231 Jackson Street N.E., stated he is concerned that the plantings along 73rd Avenue are sufficient to screen the parking lot. 2K PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3. 1989 ' PAGE 12 Mr. Pearson stated traffic is already heavy on 73rd Avenue. Adding one lane each way will make it more difficult to enter 73rd Avenue from Melody Manor, particularly at Jackson Street. Ms. Dacy stated at this time there are no plans for a stop sign at that intersection; however, they do have to meet certain standards to make sure the street is designed in a safe manner. Ms. Porchniak suggested Target consider staggered starting times for Target employees. It might help alleviate some of the traffic problems. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE pOBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:15 P.M. Mr. Saba stated the plan looked like a well thought out plan, and the expansion is definitely needed. Target has certainly tried to address all the concerns of the neighborhood. Mr. Dahlberg commended Target for their responsiveness to the community and the neighbors. It is appreciated when a petitioner has done their homework and taken the opportunity to find out the neighbors' needs and concerns. His only recommendation is that the plat be resolved before the Counci2 meeting. Mr. Barna suggested the first sentence in stipulation #1 be deleted and that stipulation #1 read as follows: The petitioner shall �� revis�ed the site plan and preliminary plat prior to final plat consideration by the City Council." The Commissioners concurred with this suggestion. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of Preliminary Plat, P.S. #87-05, by Target Northern Distribution Center Addition, by Target Stores, Inc., 1. The petitioner shall revise the site plan and preliminary plat prior to final plat consideration by the City Council. 2. The petitioner shall receive approval from the Army Corps of Engineers and the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to grading the site. 3. The petitioner shall submit a landscape plan prior to building permit issuance. 2L PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3. 1989 PAGE 13 4. The petitioner shall convey a 15 foot bikeway/walkway easement along 73rd Avenue and along the new west lot line alignment to connect to the 73rd Avenue easement. A bikeway/walkway construction plan shall also be submitted for review by the City. 5. Primary truck/trailer access shall be limited to the entrance on the Central Avenue Service Road with the secondary access at existing Able Street. 6. A special use permit application must be filed for exterior storage on the property. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Ms. Dacy stated the public hearing for the final plat will be set by the City Council at their May 5 meeting for June 5, 1989. Chairperson Kondrick called a 10 minute recess at 9:20 p.m. 3. PUBLTC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING, ZOA #89-01. BY JEROME FARRELL: To rezone the properties described as Lots 1, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, from C-1, Local Business, to C-2, General Business, the same being 250 Osborne Road N.E. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to open the public hearing. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE POBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 9II25 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated this property abuts Osborne Road on the north, Commerce Lane on the west, and the University Avenue Service Road on the east. The property is zoned C-1, Neighborhood Commercial District, and is surrounded by M-1 and M-2 zoning to the south, C- 1 zoning to the southeast, vacant M-2 zoning to the northwest, and C-2 and C-3 to the north. Ms. Dacy stated five variance requests were brought before the Appeals Commission and those were summarized in the staff report. One of the variance requests was to reduce the size of parking stalls from 10 ft. x 20 ft. to 9 ft. x 18 ft., and the Appeals Commission approved that variance. Ms. Dacy stated that if this proposed plan was not before the Planning Commission and they were just looking at zoning issues, staff would probably recommend that this property, and probably the C-1 property to the south, be rezoned to C-2. Given the way the 2M PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 14 immediate area has developed, staff feels C-2 uses and regulations are more appropriate than C-1 in this location. Ms. Dacy stated the Appeals Commission raised some concerns about eqress and ingress to the site and whether there would be a traffic problem leaving the site onto the service road and then onto Osborne Road. At peak times, staff agrees that stackinq could occur. Looking at the width of the driveways, staff is reconunending the driveways be striped to allow a free right hand turn on each of the exits, one lane in and two lanes out onto the service road to help facilitate traffic. The Appeals Commission looked at widening the southern driveway, but that is intended for a drive-through window for a fast food restaurant and the petitioner had some concerns about widening that driveway. Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending approval of the rezoning request, ZOA #89-01, by Jerome Farrell, with the following stipulations: 1. Approval of the variance requests request for the number of parking spaces to be 335 spaces on-site, with cross parking easements to provide 384 spaces. 2. Compliance with the site plan stipulations as recommended by the Appeals Commission as follows: a. The driveway onto Commerce Lane is shifted to the south 15 feet. b. The landscape plan shall be amended to provide a 36 inch planting strip along Osborne Road and the University Avenue Service Drive and to provide columnar arborvitae instead of columnar buckthorn. c. Underground sprinkling shall be installed in the front and side yard setback areas. d. A storm water management plan must be submitted prior to issuance of building permit and must be approved by the Public Works Director. e. A dumpster detail shall be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. f. The petitioner shall submit a lighting plan prior to building permit issuance to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director. g. The rezoning application must be approved by the City Council. 2N PLANNING COMMZSSION MEETING, MAY 3. 1989 PAGE 15 h. The petitioner shall file a plat application to create a separate parcel for the second free- standing building by July 1, 1989. i. The petitioner shall submit an on-site traffic sign and pavement marking plan prior to building permit issuance. The one way exits shall be clearly marked on the site. j. The site plan shall be revised to include landscape islands on the east end of the three interior parking aisles. Ms. Dacy stated staff is also recommending the Planning Commission consider recommending that the City Council amend the size of parking stalls to 9 ft. x 18 ft. Ms. Sherek asked what provisions are being made for pedestrian safety for people crossing Osborne Road to the shared parking at Marquette Bank and Bob's Produce. Ms. Dacy stated there is no designated crosswalk. She agreed this not the perfect solution. However, with the industrial nature to the south, most of the business is during the day 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and the traffic on Osborne Road is not as significant as it obviously is on the service road. Maybe the City can work with the County on getting a crosswalk on Osborne Road. Ms. Dacy stated a cross parking arrangement with Perkins would be perfect; however, the petitioner has stated that a restaurant usually does not want competition as a next door neighbor. Staff had asked the petitioner to look at the Mayflower site, but that site has only 12 spaces and it is to the rear of the proposed theater. She felt they were looking at overflow parking only at peak periods. The majority of the year, that parking might not be needed. But, she agreed with Ms. Sherek that there is a safety as�ect here. Mr. Barna stated he would rather decrease the size of the parking stalls and put more stalls into the site than have people crossing Osborne Road. Ms. Sherek stated that whether or not the petitioner has a cross parking easement with Perkins, people are going to first park at Perkins, then on the service road, and then Osborne Road before they are going to park across the road. Unless someone can convince her differently, she feels the petitioner is attempting to overutilize the size. This project just doesn't look like a safe situation. Mr. Kondrick agreed. He stated the parking situation is not good. r��J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 PAGE_16 Mr. Saba stated a crosswalk across Osborne Road is almost mandatory. Ms. Dacy stated Fridley's parking ratio for retail is quite high at 1 car per 150 sq. ft. of retail. If they used a ratio of 1 car per 200 sq. ft. of retaiZ, the required spaces would be reduced by 20. Mr. FarreZl agreed there is a parking issue; however, they have put theaters into retail centers before, and there is quite a bit of shared parking. The theater people have spent six months looking at this site. They are requiring 310 stalls on the whole site, and they know what is being done with the retail on the site. Mr. Farrell stated Fridley's parking requirement for retail is somewhat higher than other communities. They would not have proposed this development on this site if they perceived that much of a parking problem, and they would not be able to get other tenants if it was conceived that there would be a parking problem. This was not really addressing the safety issue, but he did not think the site is underparked at all. Mr. Farrell stated the reason they have not pursued a cross parking easement with Perkins is because most restaurants are willing to provide a cross parking easement with the stipulation that there be no restaurant on the new site. He stated that has decided economic drawbacks for them. Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner would consider reducing the number of theater screens to six. Mr. Farrell stated they are going with what the theater people want. The trend is to go with more screens and a smaller seating capacity. Mr. Dahlberg stated he is really concerned about the traffic movement more than any other issue. He is very disappointed to see all the traffic from the site going onto the service road. It is virtually impossible whenever there is any traffic at all on the service road to make a left hand turn to go west on Osborne Road or to go north on the service road. He realized that the theater times are staggered, but they are only staggered 10-15 minutes, and traffic does not clear out in that amount of time. Utilization of the site and orientation of the buildings is not appropriate for this site. It did not make any sense to force traffic onto only one street when there is access to three streets. What is wrong with access to Commerce Lane? 2P PLANNZNG COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3. 1989 PAGE 17 Mr. Farrell stated there is nothing wrong with an exit to Commerce Lane. The Appeals Commission suggested another lane north around the drive-through to allow traffic to go out onto Commerce Lane. Mr. Dahlberg stated that one lane is not going to alleviate the stress on the service road in terms of traffic volume. Ms. Dacy stated that regarding the driveway at Osborne and Commerce Lane, there is a median on Osborne that would prevent traffic from crossing Osborne and going west. That would mean authorization from Anoka County to cut a median. A second alternative would be to have a right turn in/right turn out at Osborne and Commerce Lane. That still would not accommodate the westbound traffic but might relieve some of the eastbound traffic. Mr. Dahlberg stated the development could be laid out differently on the site so the site could be accessed from two streets. He did not see the logic for the plan as it is designed, other than its orientation toward University Avenue. Moving the theater and the commercial to the south would improve the parking layout. Mr. Farrell stated they worked on this proposal for a couple of months. This orientation is what they came up with for maximum utilization of the site, and because the theater people want the theater and the parking facing University. Mr. Dahlberg stated he still did not like the current plan. He realized the Planning Commission is not addressing a proposal at this meeting, but a rezoning. However, if the,y recommend approval of the rezoning, then potentially they are endorsing this proposal because that is what is being proposed for the site. He stated he is not opposed to the rezoning, but he is opposed to this specific proposal. Ms. Dacy stated staff's recommendation is for the Planning Commission to base their approval on the variances as recommended by the Appeals Commission and the site plan stipulations. If the proposal never existed, staff would still recommend the rezoning. In the past, however, the City Council has passed a rezoning based on a particular plan. Mr. Bob Lange, 189 Logan Parkway, reminded the Commission members of the restricted traffic conditions at the Holly Shopping Center at Mississippi and University where all the traffic accesses onto one street. He agreed with Mr. Dahlberg's concerns. An exit on the south side of the property to Commerce Lane would be very useful. Mr. Jim Fuqua stated he is with Conoco, Inc., who owns the Jet Store on the corner of Osborne and University. He stated he expressed concern at the Appeals Commission about the blocking of PLANNING COMMISSION MEETTNG, MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 18 their driveway an the service road by the traffic coming out of the proposed development. He stated he is not opposed to the rezoning or the proposed development and is willing to work with the petitioner on the driveway location. OTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-C$AIRPERBON RONDRICR DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 10:10 P.M. Mr. Dahlberg stated, again, it is position that it is not appropriate to take all the traffic out onto one street. He also did not think it is appropriate to approve a development when the development has to rely on cross parking easements on other sites to meet the parking requirements. In this particular case, with cross parking easements with Marquette Bank and Bob's Produce, they also had the potential of creating serious problems for pedestrians and traffic on Osborne Road. Mr. Dahlberg stated he agreed with Ms. Sherek when she commented earlier that this appears to be overutilization of the site. He encouraged the Planning Commission members to vote against the proposal as submitted. A theater is fine and retail is fine, but not in the way it has been presented. Mr. Saba stated he liked the idea of a theater in this location in Fridley. His one objection, too, is dumping all the traffic onto Osborne Road. Sharing some of the traffic load with Commerce Lane would be a better plan. Ms. Sherek stated this proposal is not an appropriate utilization of the site. The traffic situation at the service road and Osborne Road is a bad situation. She did not feel as strongly about a cross parking easement when that parking is adjacent to the site, but when a cross parking easement has to be across a busy County road in order to meet the parking requirements, then she could not possible agree with the proposal. Mr. Barna stated it is not a matter of the utilization of the site; it is a matter of the traffic flow design. Mr. Kondrick stated he also agreed with Ms. Sherek and Mr. Dahlberg. Too much is being proposed for this site. Parking should be on site, and people should not have to go off site for parking. Mr. Saba stated he would feel more comfortable about this proposal if there was a better traffic flow design. 2Q 2R PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3. 1989 PAGE 19 MOTION by Mr. Barna to recommend to City Council approval of Rezoning, ZOA #89-01, by Jerome Farrell, based on planned development, the variances as approved by the Appeals Commission, and the site plan stipulations . MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City Council denial of Rezoning, ZOA #$9-01, by Jerome Farrell, to rezone the properties described as Lots l, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, from C-1, Local Business, to C-2, General Business, the same being 250 Osborne Road N.E., based on the following reasons: 1. inappropriate utilization of the site 2. one street frontage for complete access and egress 3. cross parking easements off site across Osborne Road causing very unsafe conditions for pedestrians and traffic UPON A VOICE VOTE, RONDRICR, DAHLBERG, BHERER, BABA VOTIN(3 AYE� HARNA VOTING NAY, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 4-1. Mr. Dahlberg stated he did not object to this type of development, and he encouraged the petitioner to consider a redesign of the site and resubmit that for review. Ms. Dacy stated this item will go to City Council on May 15. Ms. Sherek stated that if the City Council approves this rezoning request, she would recommend one additional stipulation: In view of the traffic flow concerns on this property, all the snow must be hauled off site in order to not reduce the number of parking spaces or to limit visibility. 4. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION SAV #89-02, BY JEROME FARRELL:_ To vacate the 30 foot drainage and utility easement located on Lots 1, 2, 2 8, and 2 9, Block 2, Commerce Park, the same being 250 Osborne Road N.E. Ms. Dacy stated with or without the development, staff recommends approval of the vacation. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City Council approval of Vacation, SAV #89-02, by Jerome Farrell, to vacate the 30 foot drainage and utility easement located on Lots l, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, the same being 250 Osborne Road N.E. 2S PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 3, 1989 __ PAGE 20 OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHl►IRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMODSLY. 5. CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FOR PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERSHIP: Mr. Saba suggested they address this item when they receive the Environmental Quality/Energy Commissions minutes later in the meeting. 6. �2ECEIVE APRIL 3 1989 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSTON MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the April 3, 1989, Parks & Recreation Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CIiAIRPER80N KONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. RECEIVE APRIL 6 1989 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the April 6, 1989, Human Resources Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 8. RECEIVE APRIL 13 1989 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES• MoTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to receive the April 13, 1989, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAZRPERSON KONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOUSLY. 9. RECEIVE APRIL 18 1989 JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY/ENERGY COMMISSIONS MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the April 18, 1989, Joint EQC/Energy Commissions minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. Mr. Saba stated Lisa Campbell has placed an order for recycling bins. The Lions Club graciously gave the City funding for recycling bins. He stated the Commissions made a motion to proceed with two pilot programs using these bins. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to concur with the motion made by the EQC/Energy Commission to implement a program as 2T PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 3, 1989 PAGE 21 outlined in Ms. Campbell's memo dated April 12, 1989, with two pilot programs with approximately 108 sets of bins for one area, approx. 100 sets of bins for another area, and approx. 61 sets of bins to be given to residents who have missed pickups. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, DICE-CHAIRPERSON �ONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Mr. Dahlberg stated that at the meeting, the Commissions made a motion to combine the Environmental Quality Commission and Energy Commission into one commission. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to concur with the motion made by the Environmental Quality Commission and Energy Commission on April 18, 1989, and to recommend to the City Council that the Environmental Quality Commission and Energy Commissions be combined into one commission with a membership to be retained at 7, the name of which shall be the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, 4ICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICK DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. MOT ON by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to the City Council that the ordinance be amended to set the number of Planning Commission members at seven (7), with two (2) "at large" members to be appointed by the City Council. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 20. RECEIVE APRIL 25 1989 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MoTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to receive the April 25, 1989, Appeals Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting. IIpoa a voice vote, all votinq aye, Vice-Chairperson Kondrick declared the May 3, 1989, Planninq Commission meetinq adjourned at 10:45 p.m. Res ectfully submitted, Lynn Saba Recording Secs�tary _---- - ; . , / _ �� ' -t ,,.,,..��.�� .rl.� �{{.,1 ,� i�:- t %C-,� `.� • ?%•� �� ,.; , ,, ,, . � + ,��%-� c . � {_ X , � � �-t.� /.331� //"��-,�- ,�.,.�. -��-�— %3z � � �� .:� . �� ..�t.��4i�� / ___/.�. i� � G� �� v J'� - f. f� �.,., /V ,� .:. � .�'�,a � c, �._.. ��. ,t;� � �--. -�/h_--� /��G�' 733� f�"�-��'7' L.;- ��ra;' of,l / 3 3G. ��c c_ c'��rr �,�- (��. � , �_ i ,''✓! .�1;' � i Avv�. ,,,n. Kr,� �._ � c�o ( G�. � c.�.v�� Y- rV _ c. , � ��ru� —� � �1305 I �G�vt �r,��. S� /!/E �}a��,l�{�:� 1�� /� G�� (r � V�r-i� iI' �� 1 r �+y V I f Li�� !' 1�.� r r r� •, ��`i� y,�.�,� � ; �� --��nT ��_ ��w� ��l'�.�5 G,�� SP�� E r�;� P�{ �� L y �. %11; r� �' a. F` � `- .� ,,.�L � , L - � ' �. Jr� �w��cx��; ��? � _� � � �°��l�u�,==�� t.�' .�,�� ue ��..� . jj� n'N1-^'��J �� -. � 2U n � ' �"` �� /�{ I �� ' { � 9sOlo O✓c! o , .�+� �✓ � �• �, . � �,�,� �; �' �,= �._ � ��. � .- 1 Sa31 �� n ��r 2� � y e ��om �-�� r�'r��"; �� J� �� p ' ��i-1 � � �/1 ��i' F� ►Z �iC��') TZS � L-�'J-�;.r �-'t., 2-3 �75 Xf�-NA-� U � �.., � � � � G�.�.-� � A �� P `^'r p �':.s'.� f , +—r; � r�r, �. , l''� Y/ Ga � d� n a. /J vr 1� 9 Lo��1; �-�r��.:��a � i,1, E r • 'Tz o 1 ��...1 s�. �l � �- �'' C �'� � � 3 2 a J Ar�s�,, �; ��F ,�.: , �� J �a� ��So,� s � c `;i ,�- � ,t�:= :.� 730 � � �.�-r7 ,, �� = �y�� ,� j��t' � �c� / /'�' �� 1L �..1 L�uT��/ �K� a�og ��-s �� . � C��s�a1 ,--,, l� c..�i� -y � / �^�� , vv� , � ., � . �. '.1 r=�:> , -�' :..�= . ;,� i• cl l -� �' ? = � � c�nroF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: C011/iMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' DEPARTIV�ENT M EMO RAN D UM May 10, 1989 William Burns, City Manager ��. �' Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Consideration of First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Re2oning, ZOA #$9-01, 250 Osborne Road N.E., Jerome Farrell Attached is the proposed ordinance rezoning the property for the proposed movie theater/retail development at 250 Osborne Road N.E. Should the City Council approve the variance requests and determine that the traffic issues raised by the Planning Commission have been addressed by the traffic counts presented by staff at Monday's meeting, staff recommends the City Council approve the first reading of the ordinance subject to the stipulations of approval on the variance request. BD/dn M-89-231 Zv ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: Lots 1, 2, 28 and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District C- 2, General Business. SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tract or area to be rezoned from Zoned District C-1 (Local Business) to C-2 (General Business). PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: May 15, 1989 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 2W � � ci�roF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CC�l�IIMI.�NITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTNI,ENT M EMO RAN D UM May 10, 1989 �� , William Burns, City Manager�• Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Establishing Public Hearing Date for a 30 Foot Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation, SAV #89-02, 250 Osborne Road N.E., Jerome Farrell Attached is the staff report for the vacation request to vacate a 30 foot drainage and utility easement along currently platted lot lines in the proposed movie theater/retail development at 250 Osborne Road N.E.. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the vacation request subject to approval of the rezoning and variance requests. Staff recommends that the City Council establish June 19, 1989 as the public hearing date for the vacation request. BD/ dn M-89-222 C� � G i � S�'�FF REPORT _ APPEALS DATE _ ��F PLANNING COMMI�SION DATE : May 3, 1989 F�i��..E.i CiTY COIAVGL DATE : May �5, 1989 AuTHOR Bn�an REi�UESi' PERMIT NUMBER APPLIC�INT PROPC�SED REQUEST LOCA710N 51�� DATA siz� DENSITY PRESENT �ON1NG ADJACENT LAND USES & ZONING uTi�rnE$ PARK DEDtCATiON ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONWG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION SAV /�89-02 Jerome Farrell To vacate the drainage and utility easement located along the common lot line of Lots T, 2, 28 and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park 250 Osborne Road N.E. 4.$2 acres N/A C-1, Local Business North; C-3 and C-2 commercial uses; South, M-1 and C-1 industrial and commercial uses; East, C-2 automotive static West, M-2 industrial uses. Municipal services are available to the site. Required for construction of secondary free standing bldg. Non� Yes Yes N/A Approval with stipulations � Staff Report SAV #�9-02, Jerome Farrell Page 2 REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a vacation, to vacate a 30 foot drainage and utility easement along the common lot line of Lots l, 2, 28 and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park Addition. When the property was originally platted in 1965, it was anticipated that some type of utility or drainage improvement would be necessary in this area. ANALYSIS There are no existing utilities within this easement. The petitioner is proposing to regrade the site and to install private utilities on-site to connect to the storm sewer system in Commerce Lane. Because there �s no public purpose served by retaining this drainage and utility easement, vacation is warranted. RECOMMENDATION _ Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval oi vacation request, SAV #98-02, to vacate a 30 foot drainage and utility easement along the common lot lines of Lots 1, 2, 28 and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park Addition, subject to approval of the rezoning and variance requests. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION � The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approvai of the vacation request as recommended by staff. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council establish June 19, 1989 as the public hearing date for the vacation request. 2Z �NC. ',v � �, •,` ,. ,.1 �• SAV �689-02 Je Farrell 2 . � C I T`,�� ,� � �� ' �OC��!-f"ti' �t1 ^: .,+ . �' � �� ..2 ''�"'� /� w .o ✓,i .v o I ` c H`, , i Z � I �54 5' 'A � � �° '� ' ,3� I I A Q ,�: „rz 50 �Q', � 34 tc ,� e h ti ' y.'��qE �Q �:l�,��," � �� a'�,�a6 a�e , .4 / Q' •79� ;6'' -� � ' o i3� �: 4� '� � T`u; ca o�' Q � � c� : ,r, :_ ? a� � N t�. ` � �/ '�� 34. ;1 n v „ — v � �, � �� q �� a N b � � �R � � ` ,'' �,� .� �. ��ment to be Vacated � � � T'N _N , � ' . . / � � S 'YO• � n � � 1' ��' 60;,'. �+ � 433-/ •' , ;,�r'.J `s`� • � '�. � ��` '. � ' �-i � . . . "�� •1'"�E� �F9�a � � �. i � . � -.'i �. '�S�e � � ^``.. / A2°�q�5 �i :� � , �� .�� -� 4 � � / P¢ Z �et, p�✓ •� :o , c�6, t,,`s'. . p � N� N C G�'4i. �% 2i��9.. N m U1 . � p� � �^ . °N t� °co .- 2D . � . � . � \`• / Nrn 6 `'�8�33� � SOs , � Q ��. /� '2 M b __ `� ' p .a N � `��/ 6q0� ` �' � � 362.44 253.50 : �,� 9� [ q Oi � �t! d9'?U'4?'"F_ �'.AC•�avr' ✓ •� a o � Q � v N , 1� i �--- `�► 11 o'e , �o . I N QN 66�og EAST Z% � �n 3/2.6B � - _ _. -I_ . — t i 1n N.•t 'I � b � � � �^ t�� u �`N �� '� o� � �6 .a' o ^� �'�. 'y C lv v ' � 1 eN � N `..� P N � I � �� i n =t`' 299•'90 `�"±� t� L � p' N••83 99bT�E , .�� p ,o J 5 �'� � --- e�� '?So( � ` p �-51b��\ � t - �T' — _ _ �� n� 25 �-s �. � -- -- ` o; .�t3��•'j -- � • � � � ��'. � /003.4 ` 280. /O '•1 0 EA!'T' EAST ��1 � h ' ,;, � ; �I 3 7 .3 •v O 2 S3• 67' �r ' ' �V N 4 N •o o � �S4.OS �.. � ti � � Q0 � 254.ST ° � � :� 6 �� e� zssz� � .7 5 u c� : N . 7 ,`oo 256.03 � -- - - --• - -- N 8 44 -- 00 , �C � �! 9 �� o, � � 24 COMMERCE PARK PLAT I � �� O � ti � � w i � ; b . � � P ' � 0 O S v � C O!�/iiVt Li N I TY I� E�l� LO I��1/l E N T � DE�'ARTMENT c�-nroF F��.t�r DATE• TO• FROM: SUBJECT: ME1VlORAN DUM May 10, 1989 �, William Burns, City Manager,�. �' Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Variance Request, VAR #89-04, 250 Osborne Road N.E., by Jerome Farrell Attached is the staff report for the variance requests in conjunction with the redevelopment of the former CUB Foods site at 250 Osborne Road N.E. The Appeals Commission recommended approval of a reduced setback for the movie theater from 35 feet to 15 feet, the reduction of the parking stall size to 9 feet x 18 feet, a parking ratio variance to 335 parking stalls, and a parking setback variance along Osborne Road, all subject to the recommended site plan stipulations recommended by staff. The Appeals Commission recommended denial of the front yard setback for the free standing commercial building along the University Avenue service road. The variance approvals were also conditioned upon the petitioner securing cross parking easements so that the total available parking spaces is 384. The petitioner has also received a license agreement to use 50 parking spaces at the Perkins restaurant site. StafE recommends the City Council adopt the recommendations of the Appeals Commission. As of this date, staff is recording the traffic counts at Osborne Road and Univer�ity Avenue service road intersection. We will present the results of the traffic counts at Monday's meeting. BD/dn M-89-228 � � �A � STAFF RE#��RT APPEALS DATE : April 25, 1989 C��Y�F PLAWI�NG CONNWSSION DATE FRIDLEY CITY COI�JqL DATE : May 15, 1989 A�� BD/dn__ REC�I�EST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPQSED REQUE�T LO C ATION ��f flATA SlZE DENSITY PRESENT �ONING ADJACENT LAND USES � ZQNING �� PARK �EDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPUCATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBILtTY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZON�VVG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION � VAR. li 89-04 - Jerome Farrell Front and side-corner yard setbacks; parking stall requirement; parking stall size and parking setback 250 Osborne Road N.E. 4.82 acres xJA C-1, Local Business N: C-3 and C-2 commercial uses; S: M-1 and C-1 industrial and commercial uses; E: C-2 automotive sexvice station; W: M-2 industrial uses Municipal services are available to the site Required for construction of secondary free standing building. None Yes Yes N/A Approval with stipulations Staff Report VAR #89-04, Jerome Farrell Page 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.14.03.C.{1) requires a front yard setback for a permitted building and uses to be no closer than 35 feet to any pubiic right-of-way. The public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-street parking without encroaching on the public right- of-way and also f�r aesthetic consideration to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. , Section 205.14.03.c,(2).(b) requires a side yard setback of 35 feet where a side yard abuts a street of a corner lot. The public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain adequate side yard setbacks and aesthetic open areas around commercial structures. Section �05.14.05.C.(1) requires one (1) off-street parking space for each 150 square feet of building floor area in the C-2 district. The public purpose served by this requirement is to provide sufficient off-street parking for any given use. Section 205.05.55 requires a parking staZl to be 10 ft. by 20 ft. The public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate room between large vehicles. Section 205.14.05.D.A requires all parking and hard surface areas to be no closer than 20 feet from any street right-of- way. The public purpose served by this requirement is to limit visual encroachment into neighboring sight lines and to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas adjacent to public right-of-ways. B. APPLICANT'S STATED HARDSHIP: "Size of parking stalls, parking ratio for retail, and public roads on three sides of project." C. ADMINISTRATI�7E STAFF REVIEW: 3B Staff Report VAR #89-04, Jerome Farrell Page 3 Existinct Conditions 3C The site is currently platted as five lots of the Commerce Park Addition. Existing on site is the 270,000 square foot former Cub Foods building which was constructed in 1968. A portion of the existing parking area encroaches into the 20 foot parking setback from Osborne Road. The City worked with Cub Foods from 1981 through 1985 to upgrade the site to meet city standards. This included screening the loading dock area, providing handicapped parking spaces, and installing curbing. The landscaping improvements requested by the City were not installed. Rectuest The petitioner proposes to demolish the existing building and rebuild an eight screen movie theater and construct a retaii strip center of approximately 18,884 square feet and construct a second 3,000 square foot free-standing retail building. The proposed site plan locates the theater 15 feet from the property line along Commerce Lane. The secondary free- standing building is located 20 feet from the property line on the University Avenue Service Road. The petitioner has also proposed 9 ft. x 18 ft. parking spaces along the� perimeter of the parking area. The proposed center is to be constructed of painted score concrete block with a painted rock face concrete block accent stripe. The movie theater will have a metal marquee with neon accent tubes and bulb strips. The retail strip center will have bright red translucent canvas canopies and will have a tenant sign band above the canopies. The petitioner will be removing the existing driveway from Osborne_Road and the existing driveway into a loading area on Commerce Lane. Two driveways are proposed on the University Avenue Service Road plus a one way exit south of the free- standing building. A one way exit is also proposed on the north side of the theater, exiting onto Commerce Lane. The petitioner has also filed a rezoning application from C- 1 to C-2 in order that a theater is a permitted use. Building Setback Variance Rec�uests Two buildings are proposed to be constructed within the front yard setback area in order to maximize the amount of area on the site for parking spaces. 3D Staff Report VAR #89-04, Jerome Farrell Page 4 The subject site is unique in that it has three street frontages as compared to other parcels in the immediate area. While the site has been platted into five lots, the Iots have been combined into one parcel and have been used as one parcel. The proposed buildings can be constructed on the site to meet the setbacks; however, given that the site has three "front yards", a reduction in the setback for the theater is warranted. The proposed setback for the theater is 15 feet. This matches the side yard requirement alsq maintained on the south side of the property. The area behind the theater functions more as a side yard than as a front yard. No loading dock or rear loading activities are planned along the rear of this building. This is a positive feature and reduces the necessity to maintain a 7.arger yard area between Commerce Lane and the rear of the theater. The exits indicated on the floor plan at the rear of the theaters will only be used for emergency purposes. The second free-standing building poses the opposite situation. The building is proposed to be located 20 feet from the lot line, Although identified by the code as a side- corner yard, this setback does function as a front yard. The building can be moved to the west to meet the setback requirement; however, six parking spaces would be eliminated. The petitioner is pursuing cross parking easements. Because a stipulation of approval, is that the petitioner consummate cross parking easements from nearby and adjacent properties, maintaining the setback requirement should be the first priority in order to ensure that the intent of the Code is being met. Staff recommends that the setback variance for the theater be granted, but the variance for the secondary building be clenied. An alternative for further consideration may be reducing the theater setback to five feet to provide more parking area. If the variance for the second free-standing building is approved, staff recommends that the landscaping not be located in the setback area so that the site distance can be maximized. The proposed one-way exit on the service road is located south of a curve. With excessive snow storage, the landscaping might complicate the site distance. The Zoning Ordinance only permits one principle building per lot. A separate lot needs to be created for the secondary free-standing building. The petitioner should replat the property so that the new 1ot line is located such that 3E Staff Report � VAR #89-D4, 3erome Farrell Page 5 20,000 square feet of lot area is maintained, and the appropriate setback from the primary retail building is achieved. Cross parking easements would then have to be filed to allow the use af joint parking between the two properties. It should also be noted that a five foot sidewalk must be maintained between the front of the secondary free-standing building and the parking area as per Section 205.14.05.D.5.(b). Parking Stall Size Variance Reciuest This issue has been presented to the City several times in the last five years. The City has granted variances to the stall width from ten feet to nine feet for employee parking. A variance to the stall length was granted for the City Center Parking ramp from 20 feet to 18 feet. The City currently permits an 18 ft. length when the stall abuts a landscaped island or sidewalk, allowing for a two foot overhang. The City has not amended the ordinance in the past to reduce the stall width because of the concern that maneuverability for larger vehicles will be lost and that nine feet may be too narrow for drivers to get in and out of larger vehicles. We have contacted other communities regarding their regulations. The majority of other communities have adopted - a 9 ft x 18 ft. parking stall dimension. The Urban Land Institute and the Institute of Traffic Engineers have also conducted a number of studies which have verified that a 9 ft. x 18 ft. stall is fully functional and provides adequate maneuverability. Applying the 10 ft. x 20 ft. stall requirement on this property would mean a 10� reduction in parking stalls. The petitioner has submitted two site plans. One proposes 313 stalls, 157 of which are 10' x 18'. The other site plan proposes 335 spaces at 9' x 18' (see attached). Staff recommends that the City amend the ordinance to permit a 9 ft. x 18 ft. stall. If an ordinance amendment is not pursued, staff recommends a variance be granted to permit 9 ft. x 18 ft. stalls subject to the petitioner obtaining cross parking easements to provide 386 spaces. As explained in the next section, reducing the number of on-site parking spaces below 335 spaces places an additional demand on the need to create parking off-site to meet ordinance requirements, and may mean that the site will be substantially under-parked during peak hours. 3F Staff Report VAR #89-04, Jerome Farrell Page 6 Parkinq Ratio Variance The Zoning Ordinance requires one parking space for every 100 square feet of a theater (259 spaces) and one space for every I50 square feet of retail space (125 spaces). The total required spaces for the proposed uses is 384 parking spaces. If the second free-stancling building is used as a restaurant, 30 spaces would be required and the total required number of spaces for the site would be 394. The site can accommodate 335 spaces with 9' x 18' stalls or 313 stalls with a mixture of 10' x 18' stalls. Despite the result of the variance on the parking stall size, the petitioner must provide parking on adjacent or nearby sites to make up the difference of the required number of parking spaces. At the time of writing this report, the petitioner was contacting Ferkins Restaurant and the owner of the bank and lawn and garden center across Osborne Road. The petitioner contends that because the theater will operate primari3y in the mid to late afternoon and evening hours, opposite the daytime activities of the retail uses (office, dry cleaners, and other daytime uses), that parking spaces will be shared. The petitioner indicates that some of the uses proposed in the retail section will be fast food uses such as TeBY to take advantage of the evening theater attendance. The Urban Land Institute conducted a year long parking demand study for theaters located in shopping centers. The peak periods for both the retail uses and the theater will be Friday evenings and Saturday afternoons during the holiday season, early fall (release of new movies), 3and early summer (school vacation). The petitioner indicates that the office and service oriented uses will not conflict with the peak demand of the theater use. Despite the argument for shared spaces, the available on-site parking will not provide for peak hour use if 313 spaces or 335 spaces are provided. Staff recommends that the variance be granted with the stipulation that cross parking easements are obtained in order to provide 384 parking spaces. � Parkinq Lot Setback Variance The existing parking area encroaches 3 feet into the 20 foot parking lot setback from the Osborne Road right-of-way. Although it is an existinq condition, City policy has been to � require compliance with the Code when changes are made to the existing site. Because the existing sidewalk is ].vcated Staff Report VAR #89-04, Jerome Farrell Page � . within the 2O foot parking setback, a reduced area is available to provide for berminc� or other landscaping treatment. The additional 3 feet would provide additional planting area for a 3 foot hedge as required by ordinance (Section 205.14.07.D.4.(c). Staff recommends denial of this variance request. Misce�.laneous Site Plan Comments The driveway access onto Commerce Lane must be relocated 15 feet to the south to meet the 75 foot separation requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. The dumpster must be screened. The petitioner must submit a screening detail prior to building permit issuance. Al1 landscaped areas must have underground irrigation. The Zoning Ordinance also requires a 36 inch planting strip to be provided along the setback area between public right-of-ways and the parking area. The landscaping plan should be amended to provide for a 3 foot hedge along Osborne Road and the Service Road. Also, the columnar buckthorn alonq the south property Iine should be replaced by a columnar arborvitae species. The petitioner intends to submit a comprehensive sign plan as required by the Sign Ordinance. The free standing sign must meet the 10 ft. setback requirement. In order to properly guide traffic circulation on the site during winter snaw cover, landscaped islands should be pZaced at the end of the east/west parking rows in front of the theater. The islands will not only help to guide traffic but will also provide more interior landscaping in a very large parking lot. RECOMMENDATION Planning staff recommends that. the Appeals Commission recommend the iollowing: 1. Approval of the building setback variance to encroach 20 feet into the required 35 foot front yard setback from Commerce Lane to allow the construction of the proposed theater. 3G , 3H Staff Report VAR #89-04, Jerome Farrell Page 8 2. Denial oi the front yard setback variance request to encroach 15 feet into the required front yard setbacic along the University Avenue Service Road. The petitioner shall make up the lost spaces with the cross parking easements on adjacent properties. If the variance is approved, landscaping shall not be located immediately in front of the building along the service road, in order to maximize site distance. 3. The City shouid consider amending the ordinance to provide for 9 ft. x 18 ft. stalls. If not considered, the variance should be approved subj ect to the petitioner obtaining cross parkinq easements so that the total available parking spaces equals 384 parking spaces. 4. Approval of the parking ratio variance request subject to the petitioner obtaining cross parkinc� easements so that the total availabZe parking spaces equals 384 parking spaces. 5. Denial of the parking lot setback variance along Osborne Road. 6. The variances are approved with the following stipulations: a. The driveway onto Commerce Lane is shifted to the south 15 feet. b. The landscape plan shall be amended to provide a 36 inch planting strip along Osborne Road and the University Avenue Service Drive, and to provide columnar arborvitae instead of columnar buckthorn. c. Underground sprinkling shall be installed in the front and side yard setback areas. d. A storm water management plan must be submitted prior to issuance of building permit and must be approved by the Public Works Director. e. A dumpster detail shall be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. f. The petitioner shall submit a lighting plan prior to building permit issuance to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director. 31 Staff Report VAR #89-04, Jerome Farrell Page 9 g. The rezoning application must be approved by the City Councii. h. The petitioner shall file a plat application to create a separate parcel for the second free- standing building by July l, 1989. i. The petitioner shall submit an on-site traffic sign and pavement marking plan prior to buiiding permit issuance. The one way exits shall be cZearly marked on the site. k. The site plan shall be revised to include landscape islands on the east end of the three interior parking aisles. Appeals Commission A�tion The Appeals Commission recommended the City Council act as follows: 1. Approve the setback variance for the movie theater to be located 15 feet from the Commerce Lane right-of-way line. 2. Denial of the front yard setback for the free standing � building aZong the University Avenue service road. 3. Approve the parking stall size variance to 9' x 18' subject to the petitioner obtaining cross parking easements for a total of 384 spaces. 4. Approve the parking ratio variance request for 335 parking stalls on-site subject to the petitioner obtaining cross parking easements for a total of 384 spaces. 5. Approve the parking setback variance along Osborne Road. 6. The variances are approved with the stipulation (a) -(k) recommended by staff. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council adopt the recommendations of the Appeals Commission. At the writing of this report, staff is recording the traffic counts at the Osborne Road and service road intersection. We will present the findings of our analysis at Monday's meeting. �� . � � K w Caw+vER _SEG //__ r�"" 1- � ��' /y./ !/sw/ ' T I ' �� ._ <o ', , ;. �--� � , �,�� P ,'\ � l--�__.��..r_� / `_ • � � I � /YroOI i J I � � L. .� —__� � � � i' �i � /7J00/ �( I � � �Vv I f �`� , I Q �•• � � ��, I � w i.r A4�wEw SEC. // 22 �...� ...`. -- ��..... �Z•—� 23. VAR �� 89-04 Jerome Farrell Ji/ l�� EC, CI T Y OF . �) -�—� ��' T -. ,��i� , _� ��'T/ 3J /NQI � f .M' H !r �' P K� A• 4 K h�: � 'If � � r i ♦ N •'lj ;'r. y 2J � i < �Z r � � " ` �. P'd� f t i' �" � r d 4 tI r : /�� a e . c 9 � � �`.�� ) • LOCATION MAP VAR ��89-Q4 Jerome Farrell �� , ' aVOt13�1�t13S , -- _ _ _ d _ � ''_ _---- -� �• Y Y , . . i � . ." _ _ . . , y U C �� / / ,, -_ ' 'y�,�' � LL V-�, � ' � -- r � 0 z Z � I !� � �' i . . �, Y� ,� � O, n -� � ��/, `=r�!!l�.� 1i � � cv r� , � � �' � / i/ f.i_l� , , // �../, f / "- •' � I � � . J I- - � : � - _.. .� ,. ;�;�� ;_:�,,�,�4�:I � - �-- -' ' / �� 't ' / / _ _�_ . '_�" ' � /"d }�' � � � 'i - . ' `--L_ � . I � ..._L.1 � � . �. -� , �'i__- .`_' .f jJ �� ! _ " �' �� ".i " ; _ � 1..' ,, x , _� + � � � = `�.�= � _– � ` — ~��'� I U %=', � - � -�-';;�. —�"� / � ';�-- cn -- - -- � � '� � � . �.: - � '� .r'� � `�.. /"�, � 4 _ __ fQ . \ �. ` ?�, . . � � � �1 �,�� ' '" ` `' �' ��1 � � Y � � . � �, i � , . :, � _ -\"`�,. �-'' i 1 ` ' . _ .. _ , a } \. � �, ` r! .i ��.. � / �� / _ �\J i . � � ` J I ,�'�� - �/ I \ / . � 2 � �� / �� /� / —_ ' Y Q ' ��i -� �1/ -�— � � � . �'�' �',. i- !�-�' ` a _'` �' " a ,1 �", i^�/ l�i . t�"�'1/. . .N ' iA � � 0 1\ -� �-,,� ' \ � `.�, � g , d '; � '� --�;' -1 � -��- �',: ,- _ N I , d,- �-^' -�'� i c'�, � ui � - � =' - i , , ` �� ,�.i a1�,--- � �, �j �.�L �,i i' e �� -- - . . �� /� �� .. l d �'` �'�.� ` '��' � y � �--� ,� ',--' --- _ . ,` .--- . � '�, \ � `� = � ,-_ ; - � / . , �� i � �! � , � ` � � ' / � � � -/ , f / � `� , � C �' I , ` � � � ` � � � , � '� � �� ` I f� \ - � �m � � I y ( ( � � 1 Q q � � � , . l � a � � \ I Y Y � '� � 'i �� 3 � \, `/ �� ^ J cWA �11 ��, \ '\ \ / � �� Y � � i` 1 \ � �I � � /� Y � .�� . � 2 m ` ` � � ' � �,/ ° � ` , ` ' l� �/� v a /� .. � ` ✓ � % c7 �../'� �y�� - m ; 3 Y ___ � �n�''`' , -� � N N . 4 ; � , c� c� i ro _ . � 2 y r�/ O Y L..._ � . m$ O N /// j � �� _ Cl . � '� � �\ � W � r•• � C � f. � a W � (� t # z � of o z ca v=i z t O :C '�+ W ' N � i 4 0 C p`¢ �< aLL 0� � i �� Q � t � � � S ITE PLA N y ` Y = � � � �� . �� UAR ��89-04 Jerome Farrell � = � �• � � �$�� __--- p� � s�W�•� � _ - - - - c • �uiy� < � . i .��Ca�� fo . i /— • 'Otl 3�I�tl3t--d— � . Y . < � � � � � �' . � � W� j~� � . . L A��k�o�o � / - / ' 1 a . . � � ' 00 �� r � a�e/ �t k /� �$ . I O ` �g � i �Y � � � 0 C � xk �j� �� I � � � � . , � � z r ' � ---_ _..- - ' '�� - i �� "' � \ ` , ' \ � � � , , ; 1 " , , .� � �` r' � , , ,- � � � _ ` ' , , . ` �, � \ � �� • , � �� i=k ,� , i I � ' _� :� �� ' � � _' �� : �= � =n � � � � � � � % / / / � � / : / �. / ^a� � / � ��-- � � � /� / I „ �' �y s • �;•• 3� � � �>� � � �Y y ' A ^< �' �� W • �' /.�� v < � . � „ � �w- / � Y Y � c � � ��Y SITE PLAN �� VAR 4�89-04 Jerome Farrell .+��i' 1-� . � � � ' <g: �d.. . a=m � g� /_ _._ _ _ �. m �� ' � �. -- - - . � � Y+� � .. ! n� »�.r�r—d— •� � � / .� '' ~ ��"o � /� . � �;,1 � Q � � i � � I ?� `�� r�� i 6 • �_ ti W � ,� � � _ • ao@ .� cuWim b !�i \ ��tl ' /� + =�. � i / � ,� // � o o � . \ ' � / � � , �W , � � , ,-�,/. � � .�_-� + � �___ �r -.--�� . � � 1 y J- v a��,�( ` ` t � � \ � t \ � ` � ' � � •` \\ � , � � � �� e ; , \ � � `, � . \ \ � � , , � \ \ ` � � \ ` , � , ` � . � / r � + / 3M � , , - . / �r ".•• �' I .• • e_ LANDSCAPE PLA N �\ :` :` ,`, ;\ :` :, �\ :` �1 �IAR #&9-04 Jerome Farrell �N _ :■ 1 ,�••�� _ —••--•---- �" •�''� --�--�— �'" �" � %' i' �� i � i , j � � „ – •----- % %' / /' ;ii .��s,%5; �. � � /�ra�"��'� , . � �: / / � /'.�:'%;R�oq.f!". � � %• %%; ��,: '` �%i/ :\ � �•i,,/� � o--a �\ • �, i'�, j / \' ,�' ------- � '� � '� � / �� /, � • �` � --- _ _ _:.` ,.- � �- �` . . � �\ � . �` :` `` \, �` :, �` .`; ` � �� \ '�� \ :\ �` '\ \ ,� \ I � I I I I I I , �� L_;..__ � i � I � i, �'1 t� 1 r � y -� , �• � . �; . � ; ' ; � `*:3 ; ,, `� � �' � / . • � ' � , �_ � C��' � •i � r r � � ��S �/ i ' � 1 I �' 1 / '�� 1 �� / i/ t� i .' � / �� % � � �i �� ' !1 � � , � �� i � I i� . i � �� , � �j �� . . , I�` �. i � �, ��. .. _ '�, � , -- � . ` -- � �, , � ` � �, , _ � � . , , , . � ; � , ��► � � � ! ' ,j � I � , ,• . i .� , _� .�'� �� .�' � '!Z./ � ,.,- �. .�, � '�� /�� . i'� , •�,.'. GRADING PLAN .� � _, � � s � ; : _, : ' _, , � : _, , ...� _ . _� : � -� � . , � : � . . -, a ,� . ;� �� : _� � _, ; ; , . �� ti � � � � � L , � � � VAR 4� 8 9-04 Jerome Farrell � s e � � � � ` $ FLOOR PLAN 30 .� �� s,: ...., � ■ VAR 1�89-04 Jerome Farrell �' � FLOOR PLAN 3P VAR 4�89-04 Jerome Farrell FLO+OR PLAN 3Q ■ i � � �� i � F � e t e I -- ! ! ! . i I i � � ' �i I � !� �: �� VAR 4�89-04 Jerome Farrell ■1. �■■ 1��''. . �i�' ;. ELEVATION 3R PARKING STALL SIZE SUMMARY Campact Communitv Req. Stall Size Aisle 90� Anqle Stall Size 1. 8laine 9 x 20 24 ft. 8.5 x 18 2. Burnsville 9 x 18 -- 8 x 16 3. Coon Rapids 9 x 18 24 ft.. 8 x 16 4. Eden Prairie 9 x 19 25 ft. -- 5. Edina 8.5 x 18 24 ft. 7.5 x 16 6. Hopkins 9 x 20 -- 8 x 16 7. Lakeville 8.5 x 20 -- -- 8. Maple Grove 9 x 18 -- 9 x 18 9. Plymouth 9 x 18.5 26 ft. -- 10. St. Louis Park 9 x 20 -- 7.5 x 15 11. New Brighton 9 x 18 24 ft. -' 12. Columbia Hts. 9 x 20 -- "- 13. Brooklyn Park 10 x 18 (retail) 25 ft. -- 9 x 18 (other uses) 24. Minnetonka 8.5 x 18 26 ft. -- 15. Robbinsdale 8.5 x 18 25 ft. 7.5 x 16 16. Edina 9 x 18 -' -- m 3S �►f.� ;�`��] PARRIP� STALL SURVEY MAY ?7, 3986 ADDRFSS 5"TP,I.L WIL7PH Menards Skywood Inn Mr�ore Lake Beach Fridley Liquor Annex Hayes School Fridley Library Fridley Civic Center Black Forest Apar�nents US 9wun & Fitness . r,inncast Frito-Lay Bekins Moving Fridley Sr. High ScYiool Frialey Piaza Clinic C�t:,le Television Target Store Cbon Plaza Grace Lutn Cnurch Kennec�}� Transnission Learni.ng Tree Pickwick Books Skywood Ma11 Zlain Ci.ty Federal Shor�rooci Inn 5ears Shorewaxl Plaza r;a�,le Lanes r;a�le Lane A�artrnent Fridley State Bank Village Green Apartment Z�rget Office Bldg Grace High School t�',edtronic Onan Corp Carter Day Paco Bldg Paco Elag I�',eadawrun A�rtments River Road Agartrnent E. River Rd Bus. Center l�iiawest Diachine Pride Machine C�ab Building Bob's Produce �Yxan Crier R�staurant T. R McCoy' s Paco Bldg Paco Oftice Bldg United Store Paco Bldg. Sandee's Restaurant Larson hi�g. St. Williams Church Herrick Otfice Bldg riinco Z+otino' s 5351 Central Avenue 52Q1 Central Avenue 5874 Central Avenue 6289 Highway #65 615 N,ississippi St 401 riississippi St 6431 University Avenue 1601 North Innsbruck Dr 7200 Ifiiversity Avenue 2Q0 Cammerce Cir. So. 7180 Commerce Cir. W. 7580 Conunerce Lane 6100 West N',00re Lake Dr 6341 University Avenue 350 - 63rd Avenue 755 - 53rd Avenue 6225 University Avenue 460 - 75th Ave 8, 7700 University Ave 5310 r',aciison Street 765 - 53rd Avenue 5363 Central Avenue 5205 Central Avenue 6161 HigYYway #65 6199 Highway #65 6225 Higtrway #65 6310 Highway �65 6379 Higtnaay #65 6315 University Ave 460 Mississippi St 6499 University Ave 1350 Gardena Avenue 6970 Central Avenue 1500 - 73rd Avenue 500 - ?3rd Avenue 7151 Co�nn�erce Cir. w. 251 Commerce Cir. So. 7805 East River Rd 6540-50 Fast River Rd 5301 Fast River Rd 230 Cornmerce Cir. So. 7220 Caamerce Gir. W. 250 Osborne Road 7620 University Ave 7730 University Ave 7850 tmiversity Ave 7280 Catut►�rce Cir E 7260 University Avenue 785 - 53rd Avenue 7281 C�mmeroe Cir w 6490 Central Ave 7421 Catunerce Lane 6151 University Ave 6279 University Ave 7300 Canunerce Lane 7350 Canui�erce Lane � 9, 9 9, 9 � 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 1/2 & 10 FEET 9 1/2 FEET 9 1/2 FEET 1/2 & 10 FEET 1/2 & 10 FEET 9 & 10 FEET 9.1 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 F'EET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET � 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 F'EET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 FEET 9 fiEET 1/2 & 9 FEET 8 1/2 FEET Not Marked Not Marked Not Marked Not tSarked 3T 3U CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 25� 1989 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Barna called the April 25, 1989, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROT,L CALL: Members Present: Alex Barna, Diane Savage, Larry Kuechle Members Absent: Kenneth Vos, Jerry Sherek Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Jerome Farrell, 2908 Jersey Ave., Crystal Dave Hill, 3566 Minikahda Court, St. Louis Park Paul Breisber, 200 Highway 13, Burnsville Jim Fuqua, 268 Commerce Circle S., Fridley APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 28 1989, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:_ MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to approve the February 28, 1989, Appeals Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER30N BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE RE4UESTS VAR #89-04. BY JEROME FARRELL:_ Pursuant to Section 205.Z4.03.C.(Z) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 15 feet to allow the construction oi a movie theater; pursuant to Section 205.14.03.C.(2).(b) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the side yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet to allow the construction of a free-standing commercial building; pursuant to Section 205.14.05.C.(1) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the number of required parking stalls from 386 to 335; p�arsuant to Section 205.05.55 of the Fridley City Code to reduce the size of a parking stall from 10 ft. x 20 ft. to 9 ft. x 18 ft.; and pursuant to Section 205.14.05.D.5.(a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the parking setback from 20 feet to 17 feet, located on Lots 1, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, the same being 250 Osborne Road N.E. MoTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to vpen the public hearing on VAR #89-04. �PPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 25, 1989 PAGE 2 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:37 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated variance requests 1-4 were advertised through a public hearing notice to the surrounding neighbors; however, it was discovered after the mailing was done that there is a 3 foot encroachment of the parking toward Osborne Road. Since the neighbors were not notified of this variance, staff would like the Commission to give a recommendation for Council action. Ms. Dacy stated the site is located adjacent to Osborne Road on the southwest corner of University Avenue and Osborne Road, it is currently platted as five lots of Commerce Park Addition. Currently occupying the site is the former Cub Foods building built in 1968. The site is zoned C-1, neighborhood commercial. The petitioner is also filing an application to rezone the property to C-1 so the proposed theater can become a permanent use. Ms. Dacy stat�d staff would talk about each variance separately and make a recommendation for each. Ms. Dacy stated that staff feels the site is unique because there are three streets that abut the site. In essence, the site almost has three front yards according to the zoning ordinance. In back of the theater, however, this yard functions more as a side yard as opposed to a front yard. The front of the site functionally is toward the service road and Osborne Road. Staff recammends approval of the variance to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 15 feet in this location. The petitioner is not proposing any rear loading activities or docking areas so it would just be the theater building wall. Theater goers will be emptying out onto a sidewalk on the north and south sides of the theater. Another option for the Commission to consider, given the shortage of parking spaces, would be to go up to 5 ft. from the property line to give an additional 5 ft. throughout the site. Ms. Dacy stated that as far as the side yard variance for the secondary free-standing building, this poses the opposite situation because this area is acting as a front yard. Tn the past, the City has been quite strict about maintaining a larger front yard setback, and the building can be constructed to meet the 35 ft. setback; however, it would mean the reduction of six parking spaces. The petitioner is pursuing cross parking easements so maybe the loss of these parking spaces can be made up that way. Staff is recommending denial of this variance. However, if the variance is approved, the landscaping should not be located in the setback area in order to maximize the site distance. Ms. Dacy stated that as far as the size of the parking stalls, this has been a topic of discussion for the Appeals Commission and the._ City Council the last 3-4 years. Included in the agenda packet was_ 3v APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRiL 25, 1989 - PAGE 3 a list of parking space requirements for other communities. Staff can also produce copies of studies i£ the Commission so desired that would verify that 9 x 18 staZls do provide plenty of room for maneuverability. Staff is recommending the City pursue an ordinance amendment. However, if that is not the direction of the City at this point, staff recommends the parking stall size reduction variance be granted subject to the petitioner securing cross parking easements from surrounding properties so the parking requirements can be met. Ms. Dacy stated the first site plan submitted by the petitioner proposed all the parking spaces at 9 x 18 for a total of 335 parking spaces. Ms. Dacy stated that in response to the ordinance requirement, the petitioner prepared a secondary site plan proposing a mixture of 9 x 18 and 10 x 18 stalls. The 10 x 18 stalls would be located in front of the theater; however, the impact of this is it reduces the amount of parking spaces available to the site to 313. Since the staff report was written, the petitioner has confirmed that there is some area in the retail building that wiil be used for _mechanical service areas so the parking requirements for the site will be 384 instead of 386. Even though two spaces are being saved, there is still quite a difference between 313 and 384. Ms. Dacy stated this plan places an additional demand on the need for cross parking easements on adjacent properties to make up the� difference. The petitioner points out that the theater use would operate during mid-afternoon and evening hours which would not conflict with the retail operating hours. However, during peak times, such as Friday evenings or Saturday afternoons when both the retail and a movie theater is operating, they could see an underparked situation. Staff recommends the City pursue approving the site plan with 335 stalls. Ms. Dacy stated staff has prepared a list of stipulations. These stipulations have been reviewed with the petitioner: 1. The driveway onto Commerce Lane is shifted to the south 15 feet. 2. The landscape plan shall be amended to provide a 36 inch planting strip along Osborne Road and the University Avenue Service Drive, and to provide columnar arborvitae instead af columnar buckthorn. 3. Underground sprinkling shall be installed in the front and side yard setback areas. 3W 3X APPEAL3 COMMfS$ION MEETING, APRIL 25, 1989 - PAGE 4 4. A storm water management plan must be submitted prior to issuance of building permit and must be approved by the Public Works Director. 5. A dumpster detail shalZ be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. 6. The petitioner shall submit a lighting plan prior to building permit issuance to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director. 7. The rezoning application must be approved by the City Council. 8. The petitioner shall file a plat application to create a separate parcel for the second free-standing building by July 1, 1989. 9. The petitioner shall submit an on-site traffic sign and pavement marking pian prior to building permit issuance. • The one way exits shall be clearly marked on the site. 10. The site plan shall be revised to include landscape islands on the east end of the three interior parking aisles. Ms. Dacy stated the advantage of this location for a theater in terms of cross parking is that the area to the south is primarily industrial (working hours 8:00 a.m. to 5:0o p.m.) so the evening hour traffic in this area will decline and the theater will be the only traffic generator. Mr. Kuechle asked if there would be any stacking problems getting onto the service road from the parking lot and then onto Osborne Road. Mr. Dave Hill, Hilltop Market Search, stated the movies are staggered so all the people do not get out at the same time. They normally do not have traffic problems with people leaving after a movie lets out. Ms. Savage stated she thought a movie theater in Fridley is a good idea, and she is happy to see something going into this area. The petitioner, Mr. Farrell, stated one alternative for picking up more parkinq spaces is to move the theater back another 10 feet. The theater is pre�ently at 15 feet from the property line. Mr. Kuechle stated he is really concerned about the impact of traffic on Osborne Road and the problem of cars getting out onto the service road and then onto Osborne Road from the theater. He APPEALS COMMISSION ME£TING, APRIL 25, 1989 -__ PAGE 5 would rather see cars exit onto Commerce Lane instead of onto the service road. Mr. Barna agreed. He stated he would recommend there be a double width driveway onto Commerce Lane on the south end of the property. Mr. Farrell stated he would rather not do that, because that driveway is intended to slow people down to get people to use the proposed restaurant. There is not very much room for stacl�ing there, and he was worried about it ruining the traffic flow. They did a traffic flow layout so that traffic would come in and out onto the service road, He did agree there is going to be some stacking onto the service road, but he would rather see the stacking there than on the southern end. Mr. Farrell stated Mayor Nee and Councilmember Billings have discussed the possibility of signalization at the corner of Commerce Lane and Osborne. Mr. Barna stated if there is signalization at the corner of Commerce Lane and Osborne, then he would not be so firm about a wider driveway on the south end. He just felt people are going to try to exit onto Commerce Lane anyway, and if it is not wide enough, there are going to be accidents. They would not have to mark it as an exit to encourage traffic, but at least it would be there. Mr. Farrell stated that regarding the parking, they have talked to Bob Schroer and the owner of Marquette Bank. Both of them have expressed '�no problem" in getting cross easement parking. There are 25 stalls at the Bank, and the parking stalls for Bob's Produce along Osborne Road really are not used. Mr. Farrell stated they have not contacted Perkins Restaurant on the south. It has been their experience that restaurants will agree to cross parking easements only if the developer agrees not to have a restaurant on the new site. Since this is such an excellent restaurant site, they could not live with that restriction. That is the reason they have not pursued any type of cross easement parking arrangement with Perkins even though it looks like a natural candidate for such an arrangement. Mr. Paul Breisber, Amcon Corporation, stated the 384 parking stall calculation assumes that all the retailers are using the entire space as retail. No reduction has been taken for storage space which they know is going to occur, but they eannot commit that space at this time. So, when the stores qo in, there will be a reduced floor space for storage space. Mr. Barna stated that in the survey of park3ng stall size requirements for other communities, Blaine's parking stall size 3Y APPEALS COMMiSSION MEETING, APRIL 25. 1989 -___ PAGE 6 requirement is 9 x 20; however, in observing the Cub Food store in Northtown, Blaine, he had determined that with the double striping, the actual car spaces are 6 i/2 ft. wide and 18 ft. long. From one side of the double stripe to the other is 9 feet. Ms. Dacy stated that regarding the fifth variance to reduce the parking setback from 20 feet to 17 feet along Osborne Road, the parking Iot is 3 feet into the 20 feet required setback. Staff discovered this after the other variances were published. In the early 1980's, staff worked with Cub Foods to try to upgrade the parking lot, and one of the issues was to rip up the asphalt and put in new curbing. None of this was ever completed. Staff's position is that they make everyone who comes through the development process for existing or new development meet the parking setbacks. Staff is recommending denial of this variance. �is. Dacy stated she would like the Commission's recommendation on this variance in order to give some direction to the City Council. Mr. Barna stated he would have no objection to maintaining the present curb setback due to the fact that there is ample space between the present curb and the sidewalk, and there is a sidewalk between the parking area and the main road area, and there is ample space between the sidewalk and the actual roadway. He really doubted that Osborne Road would be widened any more than it is now. Mr. Kue�hle and Ms. Savage stated they also had no objection to the present curb setback remaining at 17 feet. Mr. Jim Fuqua, Conoco, Inc., stated Conoco owned the Jet Store on the corner of Osborne Road and University Avenue. He stated he is not opposed to the project, but is concerned about the stacking space onto the service road from the proposed project, because it would effectively block his driveway off the service road. In looking at the plans and the aerial, Ms. Dacy stated it did not appear that there would be any problem; however, she would look into it. Mr. FarreZl stated they definitely do not want to do anything that will interfere with the Jet Store's driveway. He stated that when they attend the Planning Commission on May 3, they will superimpose the project and the Iocation of the Jet Store onto the location map and lay out the driveway so it does not interfere with the Jet Store's driveway. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICS VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE PUBLIC AEARING CLOSED AT 8:30 P.M. 3Z 3AA APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 25. 1989 - _ PAGE 7 MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, VAR #89-04, by Jerome Farrell, pursuant to Section 205.14.03.C.(1) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 15 feet to allow the construction of a movie theater on Lots 1, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, the same being 25O Osborne Road N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City Council denial of variance request, VAR #$9-04, by Jerome Fa�rell, pursuant to Section 205.14.03.C.(2).(c) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the side yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet to allow the construction of a free-standing commercial buiiding on Lots l, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, the same being 250 Osborne Road N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, VAR #89-04, by Jerome Farrell, pursuant to Section 205.14.05.C.(1) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the number of required parking stalls from 3$4 to 335, on Lots 1, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, the same being 250 Osborne Road N.E., with the stipulation that the petitioner obtain cross parking easements so that the total available parking spaces are 384. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CIiAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, VAR #$g-04, by Jerome Farrell, pursuant to Section 205.05.55 of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the size of a parking stall from 10 ft. x 20 ft. to 9 ft. x 18 ft. on Lots 1, 2, 28, and 29, Block 2, Commerce Park, the same being 250 Osborne Road N.E. Ms. Savage stated staff is recommending the ordinance be amended to change the parking stall size from 10 ft. x 20 ft. to 9 ft. x 18 ft. She stated she would be in favor of recommending that amendment to the City Council. She is persuaded that 9 x 18 is a workable stall size. When this has come up in the past, she has been in favor of reducing the stall size. Mr. Kuechle stated he is basically against voting in favor oi this motion to reduce the parking stall size to 9 x 18; however, for -� this particular project, if they do not reduce the stall size, the C11_�� s APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 25, 1989 - PAGE 8 lack of parking stalls would make a bad situation even worse. He stated he would be opposed to an ordinance change reducing the size of parking staZls to 9 x 18. It is not a good idea to have 9 x 18 stalls in heavy traffic areas such as restaurants and movie theaters. Mr. Barna stated that it �eems that with single striped stalls, 9 feet seems narrow. However, a 9 ft. width stall with double striping seems adequate. There seems to be some psychological effect with this. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council that the variances recommended for approval be contingent upon the following stipulations: 1. The driveway onto Commerce Lane is shifted to the south 15 feet. 2. The landscape plan shall be amended to provide a 36 inch planting strip along Osborne Road and the University Avenue Service Drive, and to provide columnar arborvitae instead of columnar buckthorn. 3. Underground sprinkling shall be installed in the front and side yard setback areas. 4. A storm water management plan must be submitted prior to issuance of building permit and must be approved by the � Public Works Director. 5. A dumpster detail shall be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. 6. The petitioner shall submit a lighting plan prior to building permit issuance to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director. 7. The rezoning application must be approved by the City Council. 8. The petitioner shall file a plat application to create a separate parcel for the second free-standing building . by July 1, 1989. 9. The petitioner shall submit an on-site traffic sign and pavement marking plan prior to building permit issuance. The one way exits shall be clearly marked on the site. � 3CC APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 25, 1989 - ___ PAGE 9 10. The site plan shall be revised to include landscape islands on the east end of the three interior parking aisles. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Farrell stated the Commission had voted to reduce the front yard setback for the theater from 35 feet to 15 feet and denial of the front yard variance for the secondary building which will take away about six parking stalls. He would like the option to move the theater back l0 more feet so that he can pick up some of the lost stalls. Ms. Dacy stated the setback variance request was published to go down to 15 feet and the Commission made a motion to maintain a 15 ft. variance. However, maybe the Commission could clarify for the record to the City Council whether or not they were in favor of the Council considering the option to move the front yard setback from tY�e theater down to 5 feet or if the Commission feels strongly about maintaining the 15 ft. setback. Ms. Savage stated she dicl not have strong feelings one way or the other. Staff seemed to be in agreement with a 5 ft. setback. Mr. Kuechle stated he would rather give up six parking stalls at this time than to move the theater back any further. Mr. Barna stated he agreed with Mr. Kuechle. He would rather go with fewer spaces than move the building any closer to Commerce Lane. He is uncomfortable with a building that close to the curb. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to adjourn the meeting. upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, Chairperson Barna declared the April 25, 1989, Appeals Commission meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Lynne Saba Recording Secretary � � c��nraF f RIDLEY CC�11I11VlUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART1VtENT MEMORANDUM DATE: May 10, 1989 � � � TO: William Burns, City Manager,�,• FROM: SUBJECT: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Pl.anning Coordinator Micheie McPherson, Planning Assistant Consideration of Special Use Permit, SP #8g- 06, by Islamic Center of Minnesota Attached is the staff report for the special use permit request for operation of a daycare facility of 35 children, Monday through Fr�day, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., at the islamic Center of Minnesota, 1401 Gardena Avenue N.E. by the North America Islamic Trust. Staff recommends the City Council approve the special use permit as recommended by the Planning Commission, with the following stipulations: 1. 2. Al1 drop off ancl pick up of children shall occur on the premises. The daycare hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3. The building shall meet the requirements of the state daycare regulations, the building code and the uniform fire code, including the following: a. an enclosed outdoor play area adjacent to the facility, but located at the rear of the building. b. outside exits from the daycare rooms. � c. fire alarms in each daycare room in the hallway outside the daycare rooms. 4. The Islamic Center shall modify the parking lot as illustrated on the modified site plan prior to beginning operation of the daycare center. Islamic Center May 10, 1989 Page 2 5. The petitioners shaZl complete stipulations #1, #Z, #5 and #7 from SP #88-17: a. A masonry dumpster enclosure with wooden gates shall be installed by August 1, 1989. b. The property owner shali combine individual lots into one tax parcel, as requested by the City Assessor (buildable lots abutting Hillcrest Drive and Oakwood Manor shall be exempted). c. AlI existing hardsurface areas shall be improved with sealcoating, curb and gutter and striping by August 1, 1989. d. The property owner shall take care of the weed probiem by August l, 1989. 6. The dumpster and enclosure shaZl be located at the northwest corner of the building. 7. The grass between the existing driveway and the fence sha11 be maintained in a neat appearance. MM/dn M-89-216 A I l � �B �► STAFF RE-PORT APPEALS DATE : rr/a CITYOF PLANIVING COMMISStON DATE : May 3, 1989 � FRI DLEY CITY COUNCIL DATE � May � s, 19 89 AUTHOR MM! dn RE�Q1lEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROP4SED REQUEST LOCATION SlTf DATA �i2E DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES & ZONING UTiLfilES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCtAL IMPLiCATiONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES $ ZONING ENVlRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION SP 4� 89-06 North American Islamic Trust To allow a daycare operation Rooms ]02, ]04 and 106, at 140] Gardena Avenue N.E. N/A R-1, Single Family Dwelling West, R-1; North, R-1; East, R-1; South, R-1. Grace High School to the South. Already on site N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A Approval with stipulations. Totino- Staff Report Islamic Center, SP #89-06 Page 2 REQUEST The petitioner, North American Islamic Trust, is proposing to operate a daycare serving 35 children in the Islamic Center of Minnesota, located on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 17 and 33, Meloland Gardens, the same being 1403 Gardena Avenue N.E. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. The R-1 district requires a special use permit for daycare centers. SITE The site is located on Gardena Avenue near the intersection of Matterhorn Drive. To the south is Totino-Grace High School. Single family homes abut the property on the north, east and west. The site is open, and contains a softball field and children's pZayground. ANALYSIS The proposed daycare would be located in rooms 102, 104 and 106 of the Islamic Center. Hours of operation would be Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The daycare would serve no more than 35 children. Because the hours of operation are during the week, there wouZd not be a traffic conflict with the activities that occur on Saturday and Sunday at the center. However, stafi is concerned that there would be a conflict with traffic from Totino-Grace during peak child drop-off times. All children should be dropped off on-site (see stipulation #1). To alleviate potential traffic tie-ups, staff recommends that the Islamic Center modify the parking lot to facilitate vehicular movement (see modified site plan). The operation of a daycare would require that the building meet the state daycare regulations, the building code for F-3 occupancy and the uniform fire code. The building code requires that there be an outside exit from one of the rooms, and the other two rooms have access to that room. Fire alarms need to be installed in each of the daycare rooms as well as in the corridor outside the daycare rooms. The state daycare regulations require outdoor pZay area adjacent to the daycare (State regulation 9545.0540, subp. 14). The special use permit approval for the church activities required site improvements to be completed by August 1, 1989. Stipulations #l, #2, #5 and #7 from SP #88-17 required parking lot improvements, a dumpster screen, combination of all the individual lots into one tax parcel, and maintenance of the weeds. These are recommended to be added as stipulations to this request. 4C 4D Staff Report Islamic Center, SP #89-06 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit request, SP #89-06, North American Islamic Trust, to allow a daycare of 35 children, Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. with the following stipulations: 1. All drop off and pick up of children shall occur on the premises. 2. The daycare hours of operation sha11 be Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m, to 6:00 p.m. 3. The building shall meet the requirements of the state daycare regulations, the building code and the uniform fire code, including the following: a. an enclosed outdoor play area adjacent to the facility. b. outside exits from the daycare rooms. c. fire alarms in each daycare room in the hallway outside the daycare rooms. 4. The Islamic Center shall modify the parking lot as illustrated on the modified site plan. 5. The petitioners shall complete stipulations #l, #2, #5 and #7 from SP #88-17: a. A masonry dumpster enclosure with wooden gates shall be installed by August 1, 1989. b. The property owner shall combine individual lots into one tax parcel, as requested by the City Assessor (buildable lots abutting Hillcrest Drive and Oakwood Manor shall be exempted). c. All existing hardsurface areas shall be improved with sealcoating, curb and gutter and striping by August 1, 1989. d. The property owner shall take care of the weed problem by August 1, I989. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the special use permit request,with stipulations as stated. After the Planning Commission meeting, we met with two neighborhood residents regarding the function af the daycare center and possible impacts on the adjacent neighborhdod. Staff Report Islamic Center, SP #89-06 Page 4 1. Traffic conflicts on Gardena Avenue at peak hours: 2. 3. 4. - We have observed the traffic at the site between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. The Totino- Grace High School begins classes at 7:40 a.m. The heaviest amount of traffic occurred between 7;30 a.m. and 7:45 a.m. The predominant movement was the eastbound traffic turning right into the driveway to the high school. The next highest was westbound traffic turning left into the driveway. Given the small amount of traffic to be generated by the daycare center and given the short period of heavy traffic from the hiqh school, there should not be a major interruption in current traffic flow. Classes at Totino-Grace end at 1:55 p.m. Traffic leaving the site is steady, but does not conflict with the pickup time of a typical working parent (4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.). Enclosure of dumpster: - The dumpster was required to be enclosed by August l, 1989 by the special use permit for the church activities. The neighbors want the dumpster located at the rear of the building and away from the nearby homes. This can be accomplished with the parking lot expansion. Additional traffic and noise along existing driveway: - The location of the existing driveway cannot be reduced in width or relocated to another location on the lot. The existing fence helps to buffer the home from the parking area and driveway. There will be additional traffic during peak hours at the site; however, it is not an amount which will cause excessive noise. The proposed parking layout will also help to make dropoff/pickup less obtrusive and more efficient. Location of play area: - The neighbors requested that the play area not be located along the east side of the building so that the noise would not interfere with the next door neighbor. The play area could be located along the rear of the building. In any case, it must be fenced and contained. 4E 4F Staff Report Islamic Center, SP #89-06 Page 5 5. Grass along the fence along the driveway: - There is a narrow one foot strip of grass between the existing driveway and the parking Zot and the adjacent property owner. It was suggested that this be maintained on a regular basis. 6. Daycare along north part of building: - The daycare could be shifted to the three rooms along the north wail of the building. The same building code requirements for exits would be required. If the pZay area is lacated at the rear of the building, it may be more convenient to shift the daycare to this location. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the special use permit request, SP #89-06, for a daycare for no more than 35 children, Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. subject to the Planning Commission's recommendation, but with the Following modifications to the stipulations: 1. All drop off and pick up of children shall occur on the premises. 2. The daycare hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 3. The building shall meet the requirements of the state daycare regulations, the building code and the uniform fire code, including the following: a. an enclosed outdoor play area adjacent to the facility� but located at the rear of the buildinct. b. outside exits from the daycare rooms. c. fire alarms in each daycare room in the hallway outside the daycare rooms. 4. The Islamic Center shall modify the parking lot as illustrated on the modified site plan prior to beainninct operation of the daycare center. 5. The petitioners sha1T complete stipulations #1, #2, #5 and �7 from SP #88-17_ a. A masonry dumpster enclosure with wooden gates shall be installed by August 1. 1989. Staff Report IsZamic Center, SP #89-06 Page 6 b. The property owner shall combine individual lots into one � 7. _ exempted) . c. All existinq hardsurface areas shall be improved with sealcoatinq curb and autter and stripina bv Auaust 1. 1989. d. The uroperty owner shall take care of the weed problem by Auq_ust 1, 1989. The dumpster and encl.osure shall be located at the northwest corner of the buildina. The arass between the existinct driveway and the fence shall be maintained in a neat appearance._ ia.Ll SP ��89-06 Islamic Center N �/2 SEC. 24 , T. 30, R 24 c�rr OF FR/UCEY ; ---� ; t5 : , . ZI },� � :w000Y, ''""F - IZ �"''� N/N �R _. I... ! a � � � .� . . � �� ,o�� e� ��: E4�d'�i 4 '•' �''•t, � . . . �s si.i i ii�7. : � � �,, •. �} € , � 4H 3, -. •avENUE • RACE � n��•• , ' + • ;' ; , • +• .i � � • 'r a ', ° .. .. • a ' .f. • . ' �� .ri, �"� '� Z I F , . .�. , < < � � r _ •., � . , .. , , ,,. ,. ' . : 2 � I w� / ,.. � R �. � • - � ' � , _. � • �\,.. ..E :UY_. ' `W . -' '� � _� � . •;�,,; � ('' ' . . � . . . , .,., I p 4 P� p,.R;. : ;�; ; : _ =:;: � � � '°•„ I /,IpOL � ADD/T/ON -- . f � . t �_ :� .�. _ � � . .. � �.� �� .« ; N ,,� , ,r--: �KMANN' ` '� Or r 'r, �.� •�:� .. �.. t. ' s •v • ' � � � ,, ;,� l� .°M "I+ ��. ...... •N,'•. �L, .«r� � � " .: ae�m� � .• i +'. �' •• . ` SfC.N �. iATH�'NA� I LANE•I �� ,25�` �3 ' ' � LOCATlON �MAP � � � , . . ... .. .. . - -' . �' r , • ,1 ,.—.�. ► � . . „ , ' i . , . ' ' � _ -� _ . . � ' . . � . . . 'SP �P��9-06 . ' . �� ; ! . .. . , . •I'sl,am�c. Cente� , . . . � � . . . , . . . , . . . • .. �' . ' r, . ' .,. � . � , � � • . . . . . �: , , • . • � � • . . r .�., . .. .. . . , , � . _, . ': , ' ,. ' • ' " . � , • . . ' • � ; � . . . , ' . ' , � • • . . •, .. . , . . • • � ; . . .. ., . . ' , � � � • � . ..� ' � : , ; . , S. � �� • . , ; � .. : f1,�' ; ��,�3 �. ',��L : �� o: .. ' . �: � � � � ; ' 26 . � . � � . : �09 , � � :� . , g .,5. . . • . � . . . : �� ' ;#' � .� . ; ' ' � � aC .' ' �. 'to=` ' . , ' . . . � . , . . . � . . . . . . . . . . ' • • �:�. . � .. . � fibrary • , 70b , . .. ' �� . .. at , . '�G',�,. � . � : ' � • • . . � t � � , . _ _ � ,_ _ -. s� 34 : . ,1, � 'R00�1'1S , � 74 ' . ; �. ., ' . : .. . . . . � J ��,...... b� . . . � : . • ' i . . ' ��/. .�i� ��. � � . ... ',' . ._. . .' ,:� :pat.io . ._. - .- --- -�- � �---. . . � � � � , • 30 . . � � � : ., . . GYM•. • , -• : . : . , � . 12. • � . ,', ,' ' 10� _ � '_... , , . � k�.tchen � ?� .r. � .. _ ,10.� _. . . . . K. . _ _ _ . ..__ _. ;i ' -• -. -• • .. • � .�. -. • '' ba�h' •-- bat�i-• ba,t - . ._.,.r � � bath.. � � :.. . . 16 ''�8' ` locke s . . � lounge , , ' , . . � s�cei �� • 1 ' � �r .. ��• � � , � • . !�� w' '. ciassroq . . � 6I � boiler � � foye� ' ��. , , - : 4, . � • �• , �office �gel : � �_•'�.: .24 , 26 � ��` , '' 'S7 ..14� . . 18... � . �' � . � � ,. . . ' 69 � �. . � • . � . �. � , , • . , ,,r . � � , � ' . , ; � . ; . � � .' ; . .... _ ' : . � . ;�' � �� t--t (,�xx,k�w�.t� _ , � . : � w . . . . � . . � � �. ��V►1 �og» 1-vc�lt�:w1� . � ., . . •. . . . .. . , . � .. � . . . .� .� ... . � � �.� .�� = �� : J � � . . . . . . '�� • � . • � , • . � � . � . � � � . 1�.( � � •� � � � , � , . �. �. , .�. Buiding�S.ketch � SN�NEH4N-G04DLUND- ' . . . ' ��' �, . . � � : . . TAYLO R, ! N C. . . ; . . � ' . : , ; •.ae�� , . � �. � . � � � '� � � � . � � �- �� . Page � 12 • � ! �� ; �i � I� SP ��89-06 Islamic Center --�� GP.�S � � EXISTING S tTE PLA N � � i � I _.. � � GR�S� �� Sg 1�89—Ob sw r ■ M4DIFIED SITE PLAN C � a � �, vi :'� � �M YI Q � O a � . . ., ,. . .� • . . � SP #89-06 Islamic Center ., � � . , � . . . . �ti � •,� , - • '^'•.a a'� :� l .. . � �'1.� J � . .... � _ � � _ 1 \ % ♦ � �. , i.�. J. ' \ . .f . . . � � . • / �. • ' . . a � ' � a � ' Y � — --- 4L � � �' � � t� � = .L �� J � � ;� -a \ 1 J '__' �` � 4"� � t � �. '.�` `�` .,''1 �� ..� 4 ; �J J � `� �- �� .:, `. J v -� • ,- *� � , �- r �� . a � � � ,_\ .. I . . ( _� r . � � . � . � . . � � � .- . � . . � . . ... � . . . . � . . �...�.� � � . � . � . � �. ., . . . � , - . . - � . _. . ,; , _ _' .._ � 3 _. :��. .. x .:::�4 ., �. � 4 .: ' _Y .7` Y -?i, l( - r'4�1t.ry�YF i2 SiJ�- '!t 3 '� �t_` -�14 7 ti � ��,',�y�''x�.h � � z ?�� C r� ..� , 6 .i '�ae� � '�.�. �a: � � `e �i � a r y'4 t C. �i �'' ..=.F+t 7^° � � � x r '"'�i ,� �"" � . �. � � � �h # j `��` �- ��*. .. y o `�"'�� , ' , r� '� t* r}:.a � s ; r � � " � ; � t� 1�',�.a�� f ��. � � �. . r ,� ;,�.=t'"c'J� � . a�`� _ - � �,°n�;��.�r" "� � s . � x e ,� af :� ` �' '� 0_ � � � � � �� ., i � �� Z �� ' �`� h� W ; x �� , �3 4 ,� t� .� #��k� � � � ,. ': -as ! Y ., �. �k�r `+?`�.t.c�ra�3v� �' '�6-4 �'�� rN ��. :'.'� �� \�.. � � � za �� ' . _ f � � �`°�, "`�'r�� 5 ; � �, �,n � 5 �.s. � r� �, .n � . ; '� �, � J a �!`sR-„� ?t` a d� �'44� n t�'� � x. -� � ��y � � - �n.�i � t a :w �" x.s ..: �� y,a. r ts f .�-c Y .� ,�, .. x � � �z r, �� x 3* z' �'' '• � ,� . 1 . i,� ► ° s�,, � m - � .. I .. . � . . � � � . �.. . ...�_. . . . . . . �. ... .. . .. . . � . _� � Nlodified Site Plan - � � c��roF FRlDLEY � C411ItMl,iN�TY DE�lELC�PMENT DEPARTNI,ENT M E,NiO RAN D Li1Vt DATE: May 10, 1989 TO: William Burns Cit Mana er �� . Y g � FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat, P.S. #87-05, Target Northern Distribution Center Attached is the staff report for the preliminary plat for the Target Narthern Distribution Center property, located at the southwest corner of 73rd Avenue and T.H. 65. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat request, subject to the stipulations recommended by staff. The subdivision ordinance requires the City Council to hold a public hearing for a final plat. Staff recommends that the City Council estabZish June 5, 1989 as a public hearing date for this item. BD/dn M-89-221 _ 4N :� STAFF REPQRT APPEALS DATE ��F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE : May 3, 1989 FRIDLEY C1T1( COUNCIL DATE : May ]5, I989 AUTHOR BD/dn RfQI�EST PE�iMIT NUMBER APPLiCANT PROPOSED REQUEST �ocA-riorv SITE �ATA SiZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES 8� ZONiNC ��$ PARK OEDICATION aNa�Ysis FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE,PLAN COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES & ZONWG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION P.S. ��87-OS Target Stores, Inc. To subdivide the parcel into two lots. 1090 - 73rd Avenue N.E. 76 acres N/A M-2, Heavy Industrial North, R-1, Single Family; East, C-2 and M-1, Light Industrial; South, P, Locke Park; West, M-2, Heavy Industrial. Municipal services are available to the site. Will be required at time of building permit issuance. N/A Yes Yes Petitioner is in the process of securing an Army Corps of Engineers' permit. Approval with stipulations. . . Staff Report P•S• #87-05, Target Page 2 REQUEST The petitioner proposes ta plat its 76 acre property into two parcels. The eastern lot will contain the existing Target iacility. The westerly lot will contain the proposed warehouse expansion. BACKGROUND The City Council approved the vacation of Ab1e Street in 1984, subject to execution of a relocation agreement. The relocation agreement required Target to relocate Able Street to another point in the property. At that time, the entrance to Locke Park had not been improved by Anoka County. Since Anoka County has constructed an improved access to Locke Park from 71st Avenue, vehicular access from the north is no longer necessary. However, a bikeway/walkway is still needed to connect Locke Park to the proposed bikeway/walkway on 73rd Avenue. In 1987, Target had anticipated constructing the expansion between 1988 and 1990. In 1987, they prepared the required Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The City Council reviewed the EAW and on August 3, 1987 declared that the EAW was adequate and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was not necessary. ANALYSIS The parcel currently occupied by the existing Target facility totals approximately 22 acres. The vacant parcel to the west totals approximately 54 acres. The proposed plat shifts the current Zot line between the two parcels 33 feet to the east leaving approximately 15 feet between the existing building and the lot line. The proposed site plan, however, locates the proposed building less than ten feet from the existing building. Section 205.18.03.D.(2) of the M-2 district requires a 20 foot side yard between the lot line and the building. However, the ordinance also states that no side yard is required if a common wall is provided between the two buildings which meet the requirements of the building code. IF the buildings are separated, the building code requires 120 feet of separation. This issue should be resolved prior to final plat consideration by the City Counci7.. The site plan and plat should be amended accordingly. Bikeway/Walkway � � A 15 foot bikeway/walkway easement currently exists on the existing Target parcel. The proposed preliminary plat indicates a 15 foot bikeway/walkway easement along the north lot line of the property I � Staff Report P.S. #87-05, Target Page 3 abutting 73rd Avenue. A 15 foot bikeway/waZkway easement should also be conveyed along the west lot line of the proposed expanded property and meander through the two proposed detention ponds to connect to the bikepath on 73rd Avenue. Conveyance of this easement will conform to the vacation agreement pa�sed by the City Council. Wetlands The 1987 site plan proposed construction of the parking lot and building through the Type 3 wetland, which is located approximately in the center of the total parcel. One of the issues addressed in the EAW was that the petitioner conform to all applicable DNR and Army Corps of Engineers regulations regarding wetland filling. The DNR indicated that because the wetland size was smaller than 2.5 acres that it was not regulated by their agency. However, the Army Corps of Engineers does have permit authority on the wetland. The petitioner has subsequently revised the plan pursuant to the Army Corps direction to shift the parking lot to the west and to recreate a wetland area lost by the construction of the building. The petitioner must receive an Army Corps permit prior to grading on the property. The Rice Creek Watershed District must also review the storm water plan. The petitioner should also receive approval from the watershed District prior to any grading on the site. Grading and Drainage The petitioner is utilizing the two low areas in the northwest corner of the site for two proposed detention ponds which will accept runoff from the expanded impervious area. The proposed building is 82,075 square feet larger than the Z987 proposal. The Engineering Department reviewed the storm water calculations and drainage plan to determine if there was a significant increase in the amount of lot coverage and runoff which would trigger another review of the EAW. The current proposal would increase the lot coverage from the 1987 proposal from 32� to 33.7�. The Engineering Department concluded that the increase is minor and that the storm water calculations and plans are acceptable subject to approval by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Watershed District. Traffic When all building expansions are completed, there will be 480 warehouse employees and 80 executive employees, for a total of 530 employees. This is less than the 700 employees anticipated in the 1987 proposal. . � Staff Report P.S. #87-05, Target Page 4 The site plan proposes construction of 361 spaces for trucks/trailer parking and 496 spaces for automobile parking. Approximately 116 spaces will be created along the east and north sides of the existing building for truck/trailer parking. By ordinance, 560 spaces are required. The applicant has provided a total of 973 spaces, well exceeding the ordinance requirement. Access for employee vehicles and visitors will be maintained at the Ab1e street entrance. Truck ingress and egress will be limited to the access from the service road along Central Avenue. The access proposed on 73rd Avenue west of Able Street is proposed only as an entrance for service vehicles for the small office building in front of the proposed expansion. Should a strike occur such that the entrance on the service road is picketed and/or blocked, the existing entrance on 73rd Avenue would be used. Widening o� 73rd Avenue to four lanes is programmed by the City for construction in 1991. The improvement consists of expanding the pavement on the south side of 73rd Avenue ten feet and adding curb and gutter. The improvement can occur within the existinq 73rd Avenue �ight-of-way. However, construction of the bikeway/walkway will have to occur within the property lines, thus the necessity for the bikeway/walkway easement. Both employee and truck traffic will increase as a result of the proposed expansion. The employee traffic will increase to 530 employees entering and leaving the site. Truck traffic is expected to increase from 160-180 trucks per day ta approximately 220 trucks per day. Current ADT on 73rd Avenue is approximately 8,500. The increase in traffic from the employee access should not adversely affect the traveling capacity of 73rd Avenue. The capacity of 73rd Avenue as a two lane roadway is 15,000 ADT. TH 47 and TH 65 will also experience an increase in truck traffic due to the expansion. The petitioner indicates that the majority of truck traffic will access the site from TH 65. Neighborhood Meeting The petitioner conducted a neighborhood meeting on April 25, 1989. One of the concerns of the neighborhood was whether the improvement on 73rd Avenue would affect the frontage road abutting the Melody Manor area. The proposed improvement project will not alter the current configuration of the frontage road and is limited to pavement expansion on the south side of the street. The neighborhood was also concerned regarding the secondary access on 73rd Avenue, west of Able Street. They requested the petitioner realign the driveway into the parking area so that the "straight on, direct" view is not achieved into the parking area. 4R Staff Report P.S. #87-05, Target Page 5 The petitioner indicated that la�dscaping will be installed at the curve of the driveway to block the view into the site. Landscaping The petitioner is currently preparing a landscape plan in response to the neighborhood comments regarding maintaining an appropriate buffer between the facility and 73rd Avenue and replacing some of the vegetation that wouZd be lost during grading of the site. A 200 foot setback will be maintained between the parking area and the front property line. While some of the vegetation will have to be removed in the area around the wetland, approximately 100 feet of existing vegetation will remain. The petitioner also proposes to replace trees lost by grading by planting 6'-8' evergreens and 4"-8" deciduous trees. Proposed Expansion Three building expansions are proposed. The new building on Lot 2 is proposed to be 569,250 square feet. It is proposed to be expanded 86,625 square feet. The proposed building will be approximately 35 feet high and will be constructed of precast concrete materials. Finally, a 91,700 square foot expansion is proposed at the northeast corner of the existing building. Exterior Storage Pallet storage is indicate of spaces for truck/trailer special use permit for any areas be utilized for trucks/trailers, a special SUMMARY d on the site plan storage. The M-2 exterior storage. ongoing storage use permit process as well as a number district requires a Should the proposed of pallets and is required, The proposed preliminary plat meets the requirements of the subdivision and zoning ordinance, subject to resolution of the location of the proposed building in relation to the shifting of the lot line between the two properties. The use contemplated is permitted by the M-2 district. The site plan and grading and drainage plan also meet the requirements of the ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of preliminary plat, P.S. #87-05 to create two parcels for the existing Target buil.ding and the proposed warehouse building, subject to the following stipulations: 4S Staff Report P.S. #87-05, Target Page 6 1. The lot line shall be located between the two parcels, such that either the required setback is maintained between the lot line and building, or the proposed expansion is connected to the existing building by a common wall. The petitianer shall revise the site plan and preliminary plat prior to final plat consideration by the City Council. 2. The petitioner shall receive approval from the Army Corps of Engineers and the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to grading the site. 3. The petitioner shall submit a landscape plan prior to building permit issuance. 4. The petitioner shall convey a 15 foot bikeway/walkway easement along 73rd Avenue and along the new west lot line alignment to connect to the 73rd Avenue easement. A bikeway/walkway construction plan shall also be submitted for review by the City. 5. Truck/trailer access shall be limited to the entrance on the Central Avenue service road, except in strike or emergency situations, where the entrance west of Able Street may be used temporarily. 6. A special use permit application must be filed for exterior storage on the property. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the preliminary pZat as recommended by staff except for changes in stipulations as follows: 1. The petitioner shall revise the site plan and preliminary plat prior to final plat consideration by the City Council. 5. Primary truck trailer access shall be limited to the entrance on the Central Avenue service road with secondary access at existing Able Street. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION The subdivision ordinance requires the City Council to hold a public hearing prior to final plat approval. Staff recommends the City Council establish June 5, 1989 as the public hearing date. P.S. ��$7-05 Target � J ( . . , .. .. .. •.. . .. , .. . . � . � 59 'ON JltlMHJIH .. . �Nftiil t - 31ti1S + . F + //N -20 1V7d MO/II/N.)M'/!NO/P } � NO/�/Ld'OdthYdl !0 1N3N�Y�Sd30 I10S3NN//1' � . _ . , tl 1 �..o �� •+ s 2 4 = �i •. `� �' ' . . • � { c ` � �! . aJ +� ` `3 �� '� +, ; ` . � � � ` t I;� � �� .'_.,_. �_� _ . � � C� a' . = � "" - � KNi > °� ,y � ' ' .;� i� '�b'�' � ° i �' ~ I ; 7b•,�1� , a . . . . . .� IO � � � y � 0 . . �i .l• E ` � O y\, � w . � � � ; c . . f+ �' � , 0 � � N � �' ' M �iO�b '' 4 ; � . W . : � . �' � . . . t�i4�..� ; .. _ / . i N � . ; , . �� .Li ♦ +',y:a,. , � .... . . n.... L.�. � i �.�,,,;a _ ' . _ _ _ \ �y .�. . W .� , 1,,..v I . � � _1T . �_ e- ',}' �.� —T— � I i � i . . , - . ... .. O \ ' .' I I � t 1 � ;' � � . d r � � ;� , ,i . ;i ' �; -1`� ��b �s � °ya, °y m ~ OV� „d, dV�. @ , � � � ', i ;_ . � ��i I {: � � � � . � �� ,] � '� . � .,5 � � �a I � 'i L � � � 0 J QCATION MA � P T 1 n Q 0 0 a w � Z W V O Z O W � cL ¢ F- : (/l a6 p c E � m w a � . � O z � c� a a � P.S. ��87-05 Target '� �1•'�tT Jj��I ! �' 1 . • • ' •, 1 1 - .�' �;� ,�� _�#��i; t� lj�i #�} ;i�� f �sY]' �� F� ��i��,'•�}�� .�; �t�� ;i�j=�;,= � ��j�}; �;� �1 s:+�=��E-.�;1� �-� '� � �� = 3�j�z' 1=€:� � � s� �� s.�! i'��i��a :Fi �_��e �� }�i�i=� F �s1 , :�� `�1�� '�� ''=i �! i",;;�'3i� j�� ;: p ��s t i s ! s l.s. �.. �=::i � , � x�;rt:�-� � ��. ti� �. i �{�;} �� i:a�� i. '{ ''��=i�ji�l:7 !�� =�=x� �t ��;�il�j3 i.-!ia �_� �5 ��3 , 1 Aii� �i {s� �i � � � .� ! '� ��''�' 3 x� ° {� �E it€��;�j�F�� #��te" 3� ��i�''��iF � ��!'�� ti�3 � ��f �l��iia'i� ii� �!s �: 3'i ! a -3.s !!t '� �:"1�9 °�� t:� j ] t_�� 9.. _�� i�i o�as 3.tias' t�er � i! i j�^3: t! ��' i�'7C.!' �_Ii'77� _� 3!f ( I � 3 it, � � ��iF�js� ��' �a�:�s �z! i3€i��7�:j• €t �°�_!" ;��= �� p� i°� � t �'�1 '}�i=� ��y "�iiii�s�3i �� ili� 5z-: � - 9�� IjiQj �°s:.i�� F�J �ia:e� lfi ��S�Jif�i:i� i� rl��3i ��Y� J � !� �:�33i .. i - 9 � .. .r Mw+u� r•w s ..r vor..«� � �- -�--� -]11 11— ._3]InA • .� � : �__T e - • V �� AI V��I �i � ' i �t �• �' � � ; � �� by � � a #� '" 4 � � >.-'^s€�+s . i� : y�'� �\.; V\ �1.� -%s. h=� �[ �=:t ' ".' u a p• � "' �:�fl b ; �-� �� W t21 � �� ,��9 i61 iOm �� ; o . siSY ,r f, I E � �3\ � � a I ? � �y iJ�i�� 3�3� C� I � � � � � � � �1 _�_..._' _ ._ .. <�i.�.�� 133YiS i ar (�.3_��__ "_i_�__�____..'�' f7„t. ...— Zy � /fOM M d'N r/ A'w�imi 4n•/� i pwr� I/ �l�%'� � Fi � � � � � :` �,� . i i U ` a i \ .� '_.___1 __ '�—.—', .Q_��_. � / �J �� I \ � � 1 I � i � 'm � 2 # i� ��'` ' � ;� e� : ' ' � , ; -- , d : = i � � � i � �i 4 �� aP. � I Z W' � ,J I : � 3 a}> � f � `-!�� I I y � '� � a I � �t 1 e � t r �'.. t `) ;�}Q �.1 �s !i .1' w� �+Z � � ��+i i � 1 � �g � � 1 ( , � � � � i �� j'i� � i€I !� � � � � �! :` i I ' , ��, i «x hr�+ a�r w✓ I� r w� n�► 4Y N N aN /��J Av /� M I+MI � . ('OO �N �1�YVa) 9 'ON A3AtlOS ONV1 Q3tl3JSi9ld �f4 �s�q �� =iD� ; � � =i �;p ?�i��-.� i� kiSi! ) jy (>>:_ 2 �� Y�i i�° !l3�1 m ��;� lF�� Z �i - j•gF 5�2 i�Y.T a 4 W s Y L u a O J :� ;�. 5 ° � w Y � ' O i _Z � . i + �*� : : r. � N z� �' �i� W �a� W �� n � �w ]� oe ,- � ?� w C=..� �RELIMINARY PLAT , : wn - -R.�1T=-=_ :__ — -:---- -=- � = � - -- -- — � I IIIII( ll ll III IIlI i I I T I ( ��lill��l��ll��111�� illlftlllf�l�l i1��l�ii�i�l ii� �. . .� ...�..... _ ��..... �. . . , . � . . ��Ittl�� i � . .... . . ... �� . . . . . . �n . . - _ n ......... � w . . . .a. . . . . — �� 1 . . . .�. . . . . . . . . . . . j . . . . . . . I � . . . . . . . I : : : : : : : __ --�.. _ ..,. �—� ; .�..ti.."f'..i'"�" "i." - ;-.I�..��...'.".r"�'{1 • ;" ��.l�.�b. ��.i.�;.��.�.. � � 1 � � � • --'--�---P--'•-F•-�- --i-- . � , � � - . .;_.�._ �.--F- � ' � , . -. � � . , . • --•--,--a_..,...�-- - - - , . , , � - : - . • --t--;-•�---...�'- - �"�.. - • � • .,-� --I---� ; - . : .;. :� ;-1�'.-- -:• � _ � �}..• .�.. .�;�.i. �.��.. • .I. 'i_�".T'�L..; �. ♦ • 1 � �. � 1 � _��.'�"�"�"5��..r...''.''. ♦ '_F'_�'.t_'i.��'.J..-�..f_' i '}.� �{'Wi.�l.'.L� �._ � a �;.�1 '�.. ..r�.�.� ( • �--f--; -- -- � ' -�..;__ : � ._' ' , � . Y.' �."�"• •"� "�' � " ' . � � . � � � � � • ""„"h'" '" '"�"�._�..."'� 'T' �".�.��..t�.��. _ .{-.:..�..i .i.'�"' 'i"�"." � ._.�_.�.. .. ' . I ' '" ' �' . • _.{..�"" "' � i 1rN�l .�p.��';'�+" ; �i..7��y..��..i�� -••---i-- •-•--�--'--�--i • �--•-�'--{--�-- - � "" � � � � . � � � . _....;.-'•- ' ' -'-- --= " . ' "(."; "�";..." ' .� r"; "�" ' •- � i � . . . . � � . � � . � � . � � � � ' � � . . -_. .. . . -...._.. . _. -.. -" _..., _.�.�i-_.,_.;_.:_.. � i i i i i i i i i i i:: i i � 4 Ilil��tllill_ l�lllt�t�t�ff�i�f�lf 1 ` tEnfalt nvE, nnrr, is� �-�' � ! P.S. ��87-05 �� v � � N w m � � � . ¢ a e ~ N . O r r� � � r t � xcx: Ig - �y g � '-•x: (! . ii. � .. . n t �x � �s�� t � � p � �$ n�Y: � f ' ! ! �� i�l# �� 8,��r �� 5 !�� :ee� � , S ITE P�A N _ P.S. 1�87-05 = 4� �� Y Target W � 000 � �$R3� . ' § a � �5 $ � �� a � � i : � � � � z_ a � �� I� �6 � � � �� z � � . :r:;. � f � �;l, jl � . �� -' �, .... ..._ a armpe �m . I �� E 3 g , m g i��t ��I,�� i;� � � _, � , � 1 � �i � ��i � � , � ' ��j:i]��'ii,'ll � ii) ii $ ' • � � Ilt;�'� ��i 3 �� _ I��i�l�fil��l,i�� ,EI�I� ��{ � � �� i ' '� '' ' t � �� I�il. tli"�' . ' , � �� "ilill�i�a �� i �� . �� , � � ` `� ......j..� �.�.... ..... � � , : �� ` � ;�Jr : 1 --f� � � � �� , , �� , � ' • ---- ,. ;-�' - ' "- y �..�" _ - - - _ - � �$R� � � ' . _. . _ - y �' � .. .rY' „� ' _ _ . '�' � . . G��i W � „�'� _ —i � T � � � � N � � I i �„ • � �. � Q 1 ' r-'� �-1, � �I, � � �i m: �=�' ,. �� '�s �� r`` i . i� ' y ;` r :��^ j-f'-, J�\�`'' _ -i - ' � �, � � t ~� �/ _ _,'� �-.� ; ` � I� b � �, , � ,lh v \ � �. I � r i � � � � ' � � ��•j�� lL��, . _�:� ��- -_ ,, ;� , t � ; � `;J ��.--^� e ' - � -� � � I � � . ; &g.�� ',, /��. ,� �..� t • (. •- j � � r ��' � /��1'� ,� � �r � � � I � r-- -.�',w G,/( � �.1 .!; � i�, ,� ,� , I; � ° �� ;t . ;• � , �. , 1 sJ i ��- �; � , �� i I. �'- i—�' � J� .:' ��• r �, • �(} d� � � - W 1 ��\ �II �8 �'.! "� � �� , i .� � � �i � (� ' �� `I �� ; �r `� ! � ' 't � (� � » �� . 1 I. e�t � � ' �� .J . ` �� , + ; �� /� ' ' + ,� x:, h , F � �� ; � E �= :; , � , � � �I i ,�i;;. � t ), a�� t�; � �►. '� _ � � ..�`;'� '' ��% / - ,/� :� � �� i � � � f�:'* �' ,�r � �= t, �� / ��1 1' . i � i l, ,• l, ' ! � � ' : � �7� . �y �i � �1 • 4 �' % i ' �, �� i /, 1 � f €`- � q� i � ¢' " � � � '�-- �'� / -'� \�. 1�---i' i '�` 1 �� - ! ,�ww, , y � ! �'; � i --�-.e � � . , a� r ` I ' ' 1I . �;, ` � - I ' � � �:4 1 I •, � I ' � •.. . (`�. '� . t� � � 4 e � y�jr j vIt �i � � J a �• t , , � ; ' � � � � ��. .. r i I • � G � � I�7 '�tl i, ;� I eA 1, ' � i:•.�� {� ' � � � 'G I,J ` �t 1 � ` � �' (� `� `, . . � � �,.�"., �I • -3 �� ' F �' � -, ; � ; � !�; ' .; .�;� , � ' � � � � � 1 .. � f � .�" � r. �, I� , � r . s u } � �� +' � � % � � � N+' �a�� s� ' � �� , -�� ' 3 � . � � ! � t � '. �� $ �-�e��e . � �� ,y `' � � � i �` R \ —� i i� q��3' � ��:��e�,��a '�I ��, w ;� ; , i � ; �5 �� ) � '� �' 1 r � � �� x��t��3��C � � i ,'� � i : � � ; � � � R � � � � a��s � � �� P�B=�� / � - � � 1 E ,, j � � � ��d .` �� i �, � r � � -� �'�t EI• 1 I 1 ., ��"� �i �2��9e �'�8�" , ' 1 �� I � �� ,� • ,+�, ,1" .! �. • � j ; ��U �$ °��i��,�� I �i i� • �� -- _ W � � � i � , ��=� ff" ��-�s� �: . I ' j�, .l�o $ � � _'•- • ._ �, _ _.__. �a�� i��:�ai4� � � �� I � I� �.�� . ' ' t , � �`�'� �� . Pro osed Gradin P-1an _ , , ., . , � . � �...�. 1 -{ ;•,:i�J :i�'•.:'� 7"C:i ;^1�`;"N - - .. i . .. � ' - - - - - - i -- - i i i i � 1 ' ' t 1 � � i r��•'�ry�� i �I � rti �L �\. �� \\ ` � 'r � ':5_', „ ,i .?-.:a<`��'��` �! ' ('�� -�'��i�� ,\� t; � "' � �. '" '� ll' f, , . .. . ._ . . � . ' -� -� q�d w. ;`�� , � .'�� ` ��a�'� y •\`, i . � � �� ` � ` .��`, � '' �� 'V �Y n � �� ,�i-Z�� ti �J � ; \ � ,\.�'�\t \.,` �'\\,\ �i�; `i=Y�� , �, � ' � � � � � � �� \ <::�' r �'. .s.': �,,*'..,� ' t , �; yi � � \ \ � < ��c„zr �,X rK�ti � .� ` ' �( ti \ K!{ y v �! . ' �� ' P � � .` ` \� ; . t �'•��:' Y `��Y � �;, S r �.L . . ��. \. \ `\ yy'�/�`��J��(, y�y f r t � � � . . , }� . . �` �� :. (K�"�,J�x f�� ` >�,!�i . � ' � ,y . � ± J.f.. �. •.•�J �L I •l� �( 1 • � � ( 7 � �. �. ;. �; �� Y. . .,,l�Y`�'"��' •'K x �� Cw L t� rJ I i �. ' lr' II \�' � t� rfx ;~`� Y�{�Y � ri(�r ` t Y. � i `` ��•� � � X��f �� f ' . . ,,� ��'1',` � ' �,�� =' � , � i' � , ��,k��y ;Y ,x x ,y V = . , . . ., '� 1 k}�?�kY .,� K � J r' . �. : `r ' �/ � + n , i • * � . � r' � � �✓V, Y,� �i1,�x,� `Y'�3i`�� L � � � � X� I 1 � � ��'. . , .,y 'i' '.,'�.'x'� :�� y�,�r�Y.1,l•t', {S`�.f•.�� .,{'' + r, •�' • �� '��., •',': ��`, ti,',�`��• j� � '� i f � � �.[r\� •"�lr�(r'�i�.�✓ 1��1� , • 4 �( � 7"`i�'y.�: � { f � � . ��r y �: r'tiry } '�`;�?'�''�rx � � % i i 1 *� e r. f� ��t XYY �[ Y r' �'� r,�; �L a r � � , " - y r�Y r.� 1'.vY Y 1� 4i� .y' y�f; ��,,.� � Y� � � .'°' • w � � ' - .r ; �Y �. N �. u �} 4 r � ti�. ry' .`�, I � % } \' • ti. ♦. -`� `� �� rr ✓ x'��. ..ny x��f< i:�,,�v' rjj! I ,' � i� a ;,� �'r�\`��Y:.,f{`Y , y'n 4 �``}y,��t� . 1 1 . . . . •' S�'y.r .�Cy\ :KY;�},� ••xd �/'\�� r. J��i � � . : . . ; �.= f�� 4yY'�y`,Y .��4� � �'�$��y��rt �S� � • y • �\�., y v ` �� .`C \ � � ' ' ' , . � 'i� •rj� �'' \ ' ' .. ' --- � f � ' '�Y �! � .... � �+v�i�n . �: �ti •� �T �`�.r �`! r>.✓ y __ .�a�a`� ��• ` •�•' .:•.'.. , l�u�'� ��`�Y�L 1 ! � �, `+ • -, - .. _�` T ' `" r ' i ` ' f1li�ii�f{� � � . .� - �. _, _ 1. - - r -�- - - ( i.��'�-;_�_;_�_L T—�- i;i��i{�i �� : f I !: �r�ii�{�ir�� ► . ��-�-,---�- � -- -�-- - t , , =i � _ _ ' ,r.'.� --,-�-�-f• � - - �' � E 1 _ :_=" : ` ' � � .., ��_� '_�_ - t�� _ _ �' +( � �� _�' ' _ �', �� 'J 1 -1-. _ . .� .{ � 1 ' T - : - � '! '�. �" ,.-�-,��-�-t-'- " - _-- __.Jl � „ • +n _'l.. .� � r. a �; _�_ �, _I_ . �`��a_. _._ . _.... ...___'I' �,/ •F -1 7'�.-� ir-1-1-�- --�' t+ ' � � t; �� 'i i »r-�-1-�- ��-: : : ,1: -�1, t � �1 •, _I_-1_I _1Wr_I___�_ t � � • � - ti J _ _ _ i _I_ � --� � � � f �, •' _�_ ' ` .� - L �- r -� � �i� ji � 1 J' jj Q � � •� -L ��_�_! �_J-�-- � : e�_ - , ' � ' 1 � � , � 1 � � � 1"� T-1_1� ,, ' -1- + _ r. .a - i. � \� � �! � ,. + � ' r- -i _ �. ' �.�., � � +� �.\� � e�� r f `RK Z! �i`—L _�_ j � L ! � _r 1 � \� �� ;, ,_ � r_- � _ T _� 1 , _�� _. ;, , ; � , , -i -- �,: r � , . � � � � , �. x � ::�` ` � �' `� ' ' � � ' ' �:.1- � � � r. • • . . � —� r � s _ � ��:;{N+it1f�`ii�F{i`f�Iltlf�{j�� µ`{il}l{� + ��4�+i111t111 �11G� �i � 'F - - -- .— __ =�!` •��1,1Lt4WLl��l�.tli� - — �r :Lti•RrL RvE. ON�. CFt r�` j � U � I 2 �- (7 � n 7 ¢ � � �� o � r�in � r � Z K W J 2 R �• � .., ,. � �P.S. �i87-Q5 W � Target �� W LL 2 � Z • W C9 Z F- J � � Z Q U W > N N W Q c� 0 a a 1987 Site Plan � � unroF F�� C��1IlMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENl' MEMORANDUM � � DATE: May 10, 1989 �• �' To: William Burns, City Manager �� FROM: SUBJECT: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Hillwind Office Plaza, Stinski Variance Request, VAR #89-07 Attached is the staff report for the variance requests for the Hillwind Office Plaza at 1001 Hillwind Road N.E. The Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variances subject to the petitioner combining the tax parcels. Staff recommends the City Council approve the variances `as recommended by the Appeals Commission. BD/dn M-89-223 0 - 5A � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE May��9, 1989 CI1Y OF PLANf�NNG CONINdSSiON DATE , FRiDLEY CRY COUNClL DATE May ]5, 1989 quTNOR BD/ls REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES 8► ZONING U'TIUT�S PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLICATlONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATlBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONMIG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATiONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECQMMENDATION VAR #89-07 azeryl stinslci Varianoe to the maximnm►height limit Varianoe tA the 5 ft. setback between parking areas & 941 and 1001 Hillwind Road 46,969 sq. ft. N/A C�1, General Offioe District N: h�3, Multiple Family District; S: CR-1, General Offi E: h�3, Nh,il.tiple F�anily District; W: Hill��ind F.d. and TH 65 Niinicipal seivices available tA the site Must be pai.d at ti� of building penni.t applicatica� HRA assistance authorized Yes Yes N/A Appraval with stipulation Approval with stipulation —� 56 Staff Report VAR �89-07, Stinski Page 2 � A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.16.04 requires a maximum building height of three stories, not to exceed 45 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate light and air between adjacent buildings. Further, height limitations establish guidelines for the scale of the building and how it affects adjoining properties. Section 205.16.05.D.(5) requires all parking and hard surface areas to be no closer than 5 feet from the main building. Public purpose served by this requirement is to protect the building from unnecessary maintenance due to vehicles hitting the building and to provide adequate space for pedestrian movement. B. STATED HARDSHIP: See attached letter dated April 25, 1989, from Pope Associates, Inc. C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT: Backqround On September 12, 1988, the City Council approved a variance request to reduce the width of the screening strip between the subject property and the adjacent residential property from 15 feet to 5 feet along the north and east lot lines. At the same meeting, the City Council also approved the rezoning request to rezone the northerly portion of the subject property from R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling District, to CR- 1, General Office District. The site plan considered at that time proposed underground parking such that access to the parking area could be gained directly from the parking aisle. Therefore, there was no need for a 5 ft. separation between the parking area and the building. ' Included in the packet are the 1988 site plan and the proposed building elevation plan which were in the September 12, 1988, Council packet. A 40 ft. building height is indicated on the elevation plan. 5C Staff Report VAR #89-07, Stinski Page 3 � Proposal The petitioner is praposing to construct a 36,760 sq. ft. office building with an at-grade parking garage. The net leasable office space of the building totals 21,976 sq. ft. The parking required for this project is 88 parking stalls. The site plan indicates 89 parking stalls. Heiaht Variance The proposed building is a four story building with two cantilevered upper floors. The petitioner has changed the building style to a cantilevered approach to maximize the site area for parking and to meet other setback requirements. The cantilevered feature was also chosen to create a unique building style at a highly visible site. The exterior of the building will consist of bands of stone panels and reflective glass. The proposed building height measures 52 feet from the ground elevation to the roof line of the building. With cantilever construction, deeper beam systems are required to provide adequate strength. This necessitates a higher ceiling height than typically found in multi-story buildings. The floor height is approximately 13.4 feet, whereas typical floor heights vary between 8-10 feet. The northern half af the site is approximately 2-3 feet higher than the southern half of the site. The existing Merrill Lynch office building on the south portion of the site will be demolished. The northern portion of the site will be lowered to match the elevation of the southern portion of the site with a slightly higher elevation in the southwest corner. The purpose of the proposed grading plan is to direct the storm water runoff on the site such that it travels into a series of catch basins running along the east and north sides of the building and then to the storm sewer system in Hillwind Road. The petitioner indicates in the statement of hardship that they cannot lower the buiZding into the ground, because the at-grade covered parking area would interfere with the elevations of the storm sewer. The proper gradients to collect the runoff from the parking lot would not be able to be achieved if the building is lowered beyond one fqot,. 5D Staff Report VAR #89-07, Stinski Page 4 The topography in this area is also such that the subject property and the property to the north drain into the storm sewer which flows to the north. The property on the south is higher and runoff is directed in the opposite direction. Given this "end of the line" condition, the building is unable to be lowered such that proper grades can be achieved for gravity flow. This is a unique physical characteristic about the land which would justify granting the variance. The height of the adjacent multiple family buildings are all 28 feet. These buildings were built in 1962. The location of the proposed building has been shifted to the center of the property which will lessen the impact on sight lines for the building iinmediately to the north. The petitioner will have a graphic available at the meeting to illustrate the sight lines. 5 foot building and parkinct setback The intent of the 5 foot separation between the parking area and the building is to provide adequate space for an overhang of a vehicle into this area and to provide adequate space for pedestrian movement. The north side of the building has a 2 foot separation and the east side of the building has a 1 foot separation. These two areas are proposed for driveway access around the building and for access into the parking garage on the east side of the building. A variance for the proposed request would not be contrary to the intent of the ordinance as the function of the hard surface area is for driveway purposes and not for parking. Miscellaneous The Assessor's office has recommended that the two tax parcels be combined into one parcel, or that the property be platted into one lot. At minimum, the combination of the parcels for tax purposes is recommended. Summary Given the site's characteristics regarding the proposed storm sewer plan, the height variance is justified. The variance to reduce the separation between the parking surface and the building is also warranted given the proposed function of the hard surfaced area. � Staff Report VAR #89-07, Stinski Page 5 � 5E Recommendation Staff recommends the Appeals Commission recommend approval of variance #89-07 to approve the 7 ft. height variance to increase the height from 45 feet to 52 feet, and to decrease the setback between the parking area and the building to 2 feet on the north side of the proposed building and 1 foot on the east side, subject to the stipulation that the two tax parcels be combined and subject to the plan dated April 25, 1989, and to the grading and utility plan dated April 18, 1989. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the variance requests as recommended by staff. City Council Recammendation Staff recommends the City Council approve variance request, VAR #89-07, as recommended by the Appeals Commission. 5F Ms. Savage stated in looking at the property, these a beautiful houses, but the area seemed quite crowded. She uld be more comfortable tabling this item until the peti oner could be present. MOTION by Mr. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Sa ge, to table Variance Request, VAR #89-05, by William E. Carls and Carroll A. Brennan, until the May 23, 1989, meeting. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AY � CHAIRPERBON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSIDERATION OF A VA ANCE RE UEST VAR 89-06 BY GEORGE AND LINDA COLSTROM• Pursuant to Sect ' n 205 . 07 . 03 . D( 3)( a) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the ear yard setback from 25 feet to 17 feet to aZlow the struction of an addition on Lot 12, Block 5, Brookview errace, the same being 670Z Quincy Street N.E. MoTION by s. Savage, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to open the public hearincr A VOICE VOTE, ALL 40TING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE C HEARING OPEN AT 7:50 P.M. 3. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCES, VAR #89-07, BY CHERYL STINSKI: Pursuant to Section 205.16.04 of the Fridley City Code to increase the height of a building from 45 feet to 52 feet; and pursuant to Section 205.16.05.D(5) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the distance from the hard surface area to the building from 5 feet to 1 or 2 feet to allow the construction of an office building located on Lot 1, Block 1, Hillwind Addition, the same being 941 Hillwind Road, and on Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25, the same being 1001 Hillwind Road. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTTNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Ms: Dacy stated the property is located adjacent to Hillwind Road, just west of Polk Street and adjacent to Highway 65 and �he I-694 interchange. � 5G APPEALS COMMISBION MEETING, MAY 9. 1989 _ PAGE 4 Ms. Dacy stated originally the property was zoned R-3 and CR-1, but last fall the petitioner requested a rezoning on the�,northerly parcel from R-3 to CR-1. At that time, the petitioner went before the Appeals Commission to receive a variance to reduce the 15 foot screening strip setback along the north and east lot lines from 15 feet to 5 feet. On September 12, 1988, the City Council approved the variance request and the rezoning. Ms. Dacy stated that the 1988 site plan proposed a building height of 40 feet. Since that time, the petitioner has changed the building style to a cantilevered approach. By doing that, the architects and the building code indicate a longer beam is needed for extra strength and that increases the ceiling height to approximately 13.4 feet for multi-storied buildings. Typical floor heights vary between 8-10 feet. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner chose this particular building style because they feel it is more interesting and is more of a unique style at an extremely visible interchange and entrance into Fridley. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is requesting two variances: a 7 foot height variance and a reduction in the 5 ft. required separation between hard surface parking and a building. Typically, the City likes to process the rezoning and variance requests prior to receiving any type of HRA approval, and that is exactly what happened. Unfortunately, because of the change in the building design, they found the need for two more variances. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is proposing to move the building to the center of the property and still have the same type of parking and traffic pattern, except it will be one-way in front of the building and then a dedicated entrance into the at grade covered garage area. Ms . Dacy stated the site plan indicates 2 feet between the building and the driving aisle on the north side of the building and 1 foot between the building and the driving aisle on the east side of the building. Ms. Dacy stated regarding the height variance, the petitioner's hardship pointed out a number of factors that combine to form a hardship. One factor is the proposed architectural style, the cantilevered approach, necessitating a longer beam and increased floor height. The second factor is the grading plan. The question was asked of the petitioner if the building could be Zowered into the ground. The petitioner's engineer looked at that and felt if they lowered the building more than what was proposed, they would not be able to achieve gravity flow through the storm se�ae�r into the proposed catch basin and out to the storm sewer on.Hillwind. 5H APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 9, 1989 __ PAGE 5 Ms. Dacy stated that combining these two factors, staff agrees and recommends approval of the height variance. The petitioner is prepared at this meeting to show the graphic illustrating the sight lines and how they will affect adjacent buildings and views. Ms. Dacy stated that regarding the variance for the hard surface separation, staff believes the intent of that section of the code is to prevent cars from hitting the building if they have straight- in parking abutting the building, to provide adequate space for an overhang of a vehicle, and to provide adequate space for pedestrian movement. The design of the plan is that this area is obviously more for a driving aisle than a parking aisle, and staff feels granting the variance would not be contrary to the intent of the ordinance. In fact, staff is suggesting they might want to "fine tune" the ordinance a little bit if the Appeals Commission and City Council agree to allow a smaller separation between a building and a hard surface area when it is a drive-by or pass-by situation. Ms. Dacy painted out there is an option of providing angled parking reducing the width of the driving aisle to 28 feet, if this became an all one way situation, and having 60 degree parking. The disadvantage is they tend to lose parking spaces and fall below the required parking spaces. Mr. Barna stated the Appeals Commission has dealt with the hard surface variance in the past, and basically they have stipulated that there be a concrete curb to prevent a car from driving directly on grade and into the building. The curb also provides a guide for a snowplow in the wintertime. Ms. Dacy stated City Assessor is recommending as a stipulation that the two tax parcels be combined subject to the plan dated April 25, 1989, and to the grading and utility plan dated April 18, 1989. Ms. Stinski introduced Jon Pope, the architect for the project. Mr. Pope stated about 200 feet north of this property is the termination of the storm sewer system, and at that point, the storm sewer system is very shallow, about 6 feet. They have to continue that storm sewer system an additional 200 feet to gain access onto the site. They could not lower the building because the at-grade co�ered parking area would interfere with the elevations of the storm sewer. In trying to work with the 45 ft. height limitation, they found their storm water collection is lower than•the storm water services in the street. Mr. Pope stated they have located the building toward th�:•center of the site, and with the graphics, he has attempted to illustrate that the 52 ft. high building located in the center of the site has less impact visually from the adjacent properties than if they were 51 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 9. 1989 PAGE 6 to build a 45 ft. high building at the permitted minimum side yard setbacks. '. Mr. Pope stated that as far as the parking variance, he agreed the intent of the ordinance is to provide maintenance and protection of the building, keeping in mind that on the inside of that wall, they have cars parked up to it. They are providing a 2 ft. curb for protection of that wall surface. Mr. Kuechle asked how they would prevent people backing out of parking spaces on the east side from hitting the building. Mr. Pope stated there will be signs indicating "visitor parking" stalls in the front of the building for the heaviest traffic. The other parking stalls are for employees and they will be used to these kinds of maneuvering condztions. They did not see this as a problem. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to close the public hearing. �PON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE PIIBLZC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:57 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council approval of variances, VAR #89-07, by Cheryl Stinski, pursuant to Section 2o5.Z5.o4 of the Fridley City Code to increase the height of a building from 45 feet to 52 feet; and pursuant to Section 205.16.05.D(5) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the distance from the hard surface area to the building from 5 feet to 1 or 2 feet to allow the construction of an office building located on Lot 1, Block l, Hillwind Addition, the same being 941 Hillwind Road, and on Lat 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 25, the same being 1001 Hillwind Road, with the stipulation that the two tax parcels be combined subject to the plan dated April 25, 1989, and to the grading and utility plan dated April 18, 1989. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED QNANIMOIISLY. MoTION by Mr. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to send VAR #89-07 by Cheryl Stinski directly to the City Council on May i5, 1989. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOQSLY. 4.� ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON AND VICE-CHAIRPERSON: MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, sec . Sherek, to cast a �ina�nimous ballot for a o continue as Chairperson and Diane Savage -- VAR �689-07 Cheryl Stinski SJ. T � � . �• wr � s' . •''' °+ ' • �' � j � .� : aec -- , �-,;`' '�. ., , . - ,�► �..r r �.i , "" - � - - y . � .�/ a� � .r � � i �`% ) �.r�iM�; � ' � �il1 � ' ,i, ! 2 • t . • „A ,I.c • �. 1 . �' � c+ , � ` c .� � � � e "�� (i) �j „A' c S , A,...��`"1'.y,,.�,. N�+j � % � F � — �� g,� � . �i �� ...•� � � . ; • +• (�l C�� . � j ' Z �••c S ��e � � � � A t �...,�, /�,,' I ' �,"` , � ,r•• lti. w }.M ' 1 .� •- �I�wr . • r i � . / / � M � �J%�� i J � ,, � � � � � � � �• i�� • •�'..� c► • i / / s � I s � • ••� � � � � � Nn : � / � •, dwi d�lrA ' �� • ir�' � �/00) S 1 1 /n.- ., s� � . �-- , �: � .... �,� ". ; ^�r'�'� � r �if,.� �, : s wpC�r�p�r '` --� • �,�.�c e�s� �e ' � Q _ `__ __� p / � _ , , � `'''AUD. °�,� :,S vtS�ON , .._ .. ,�,... . � . W'� v�_ � " Fn- i � . ► � � , --- � --_ L_____ . j M � ' � : 1 � . � .� ----------! ' �_. .�._.__.. s - •� � ;, 2 ,: �:. ____ �..____._ _..__�,:_ � j- � _:�.-._. ------ -----.--____�..__(�---- _ � ' ''�l�� i �' �`_`�'� � Y �Y/; ` ��_ � • �'"t�. � • � .� � � :! � J •i �,��,�..�� . � j •,/ +� _` -� ! �� ,' , �� ' � . .L LQCATIOi� MAF i � � " � `: � � � a i� �_� t• • � � �w 1�: � � t s �% , i � ., ;. -- VAR 4i89-07 Cheryl Stinski � � � � � � .'��, � � .�l� ' y L' � � � � : i ~ _ � t ( sL1_� _ :�;�:;;- j�v%" �� :: '1 � N��.� �- �' �� 'f � y y �� 1 � ,v � 1 Y � �I � �� : 5K 1988 S ITE PLA N VAR ��89-07 Chervl Stinski i s . • M s 0 � s > W � � .+ .+ s � j i � i � ' ! , � � i . � . � 1 ± � ; ; � i ` i ( � I i I � �t� O! :H' ,�� {�� :.a: ;�t �Yd' i�l �, 'NI ',wl V �ZI �C:�. �_� � �mi. 1988 ELEVA�TtON � � VAR 4t89-07 Cheryl Stinski .... ,.. I ---- :��asr.. -- 1 i.�:4,: ' q.�:: , �• . . � . . � ,�� "' � t . � !_..'_ i . `' --._ _. ..__.. � .___ .. _ _•��-�• . __ ._._ = - - ....+ . r.� • — - - � � : 2'�bu�d' end • rking separation. � �� 4, :�;;_ L.� . '-.�- � fi,. �., ; ' �+ 's. �� , ., 1, _- _ . . . �� - r _ �, � `� � �$I� � a "' � '"'LAWi�f'O (� UI'�l.�eS � � � � —.�► -: �- "'� - . -rt .� : : � a� � is �� : � °' S � t i+..,."'= �., ,, A � a � �_ �ta a.=a • � �� i/41 � �•�i: � 4 STORY °� �' �t • . x � OFFICE BUILDING �*�—" ° � L� - � s 1' building and parking separation. �� o� q .� fi i: � � « ' � � �w� !�� -___� �NOGI. MW ` ��. �� O / '�""' i! "' �4!•t! i �"_« ' '� .� " _� � o . � 49'•� i 'i'♦ •� W�-a� _ .. �Lai��l, 4e`'• 1:0'. `. Cy�p• � " • �r. ..� 4 t. `Z�' i . � i - ___ _ _ _._ __ ��-� __.. _ � ----_ � , � r � ; " �1K. ' ( ' • ' � ' M , ' � �Tx � 4 • i � � I � � : 1!° � ____�__:.__. � . . � _ __ L.-�` .�cv --�-- �a:s�:----- � SITE PLAN 5M VAR 4689-07 Cheryl Stinski ' ' v� i ''' ��_'i� .•. i. � �� i' K � �l � � / +' , � � . O N ( _ � o i j � ,\ ( , -�, ; � � � , � � 1%; ,oti , ' a �j � , �� . �! � � mo � � � � f � �► � I J i �� , �� L� ' I � � �P• S, l I � �f},I _ � , � _ J @ NO� rS N I � ��R; •. i� � � �. 'W NH Z � I i I J� �t I' I i /. � i. „' , � W � S �15 d�tl„2� •�� r�� 1 - - _ ��y ' \ i � � � . �' 2Q ► , { � � � � ry_i � ' � � � j. : . ' s ; ` . � S ` W ,� � • n. W R•� i � � � �I I � , �O � .. /. j . � .. _ � Q �� .� aa ' ri � � � � ' ~w I � b ��.• � ti �o � �' � ) `' I �'' ; ; . � ; � � � `' W= i � % �� : � � ay o � ..� _��:�. � � � , , � �� {jJ'' = - ��, 1 j E �� s .. � a i� � � ,J � � "'�� V% 1,'� � . . 1 vO�S �I � ! ' •� ,�' S Z � / N 1 t' ` "�_ :� � I ` �r N O / �D � N I ' �; •l.wt'1 N VJ P . � " , ' � . � /�� ; O� •O � C C �� ' � � t ' � � ~ �~ � � N � • / � . . �. � � � . I D iA�'/ i� � I N 9�� ,{I }}} � ? �'I I �� ~W W . }'1 , � �i / � � , .c3 �Ni/ 1 j o �� 1� � es o � J � � Ao c�+ I �� lJ I � . s / j j� � .i i � � � n I � .l � - -� ' � I `` a 1 : � • '�i J � ., � � a ��I � � O :� �_ LL �� '� i �' a} i o � � + O.� I� � �� f �,/ Y � i. ti�a � m [L � 3 ' 'j l �+ �,,� � � ` ' �/� � N$ i % �\ � ', � �� I � ' „r•:- ': i `� ` � I , � , : J � ; � � � ,�.�-- � �� ` i . N � � i �� ' �' . � - -- - - M I . s �•w o � a �� .:� � tr .� `��. � � � ` �� / � � � '� � � � � � ` � � � � � � WI � Y� � ( �' � �`�` I �I p� '� ~ O � ^P I � - C. . . . J �r ,�� .� � ~ N � � .'.�. 1 S W , . W nw � �. V 1 1 ; ' ; Q � '•, � � S� I uO � �, � . ? �1 ; • O y� ^ .. \ ' � W m '� r � N Z > ', / ; � • Q i � ; I // './ � aAAp�� W � �� N 1 1�. �� / r' ` 6 � �4 ; , -- ` ; —`� " , �1 •4 I I � � p� �'� � ' � I �an .�` . Z � •� � � '� '�. ?� � P ` ' � a � �.� . a I . � ! ,� ,� t 1 �. e � y � ��'� ' r,y � O� �_ J � ,�, tl � � � • ' �, � � ^ � �_ !� � , Storm e er to be � � �, � � - �-- ` / .� � i' , " -��. � ,1 � �. �', � � � , i �� n , �, , , � � � � ' G�' / �. ,I W � �N � �� "Q � ' ' yj �`�� .'�/./ • � �� ►!� - '� ' s -� t � � , : 6• wJ � •. . . r ` .I �i a �, E ��.�i/�,� O�� . . � 4 � o � e e 7j'2 9 �� . ' • � ,r I �+ '"� N? / .,� � � ~ I � r� +� �, �.- - - - 8��= �.'� od ' ° f� W t � �� .v. /' s � �..�-'^" ._ r�. I C� d`� �'� /'�'r � `� ! � ' ° "+ GRADING PLAN 5N f VAR 4689-07 Cheryl Stinski � � \� C W a a� a a � a� �v c ea J o°o°m°o°88°oF88 D y s OIlli t�1o�00 � Y h�11NY1lI�•�Y1N • i C O � _ C i � D � u j� n u > S� w � �e` � : �a«5.go �% . $ � o •�-iiy��>� .. o �t �8 � �__=�: .� � � °e ~y::� E:op =e� �•v` ' y O � <�iiO�YQON� " � . ' °8 � �..�.,.�-•R�� • �• � t�YCWV�2O— ' � � Z� t l • �l i i ► e LANDSCAPE PLAN 50 .: � � �, � a+. _ ; �C�� `; �+'•.._ ��' - � IN�«wIMD C FlIDLEY, MINNESOTI �iParks �Streets iMaintenance � MEMORANDUM . TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�� PW89-106 FROM: John G. F1ora,fPublic Works Director �Clyde V. Moravetz, Engineering Assistant DATE: May 9, 1989 SU&7ECT: Sixth Rider to Agreement - City of Fridley and Board of Water Commissioners of City of St. Paul As you know, Commerce Lane, from 73rd Ave. to Osborne Rd., is scheduled to be reconstructed this summer. As part of this improvement, it is planned to construct a 15-inch storm sewer pipe under Osborne Rd. west of Main St. (see Exhibit "A: of the abave- referer►ced agreement) . The storm sewer improvement will involve crossing the St. Paul Waterworks easement which requires a permit. Attached is a resolution authorizing the City to enter into the agreement with the City of St. Paul Board of Water Commissioners (Sixth Rider). This agreement is a prerequisite to obtaining this permit. Recommend the City Council: (1) approve the resolution and (2) the Mayor sign all four (4) copies of the agreement at the May 15 City Council meeting. We must have the signed copies along with four (4) certified copies of the approved Council Resolution by May 18 in order for it to be acted on by the Board of Water Commissioners at their May 25 meeting. JGF/CVM/ts Attachments �•J / � �� SIXT't{ RIDER TO AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, Made this dat• of , 1989� b�� and between the BOARD OF WATER COA4�SISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA, hereinafter called the "Board", and the CI1'Y OF FRIDLEY, County of Anoka, hereinafter called the "City", being a Sixth Rider to that certain Agreement made b�� and betr:een said Board and said Cit�� the 13th day of November 1963, and by this reference incorporated herein and made part and parcel hereof with the same intent, purpose and effect as if said Agreement were set forth herein, verbatim. WITI,'ESSETH: WHF.REAS, The Board now possesses title to an easement in certain real estate 1>�in� generall�• north of and adjacent to Osborne Road, in Section 11, Township 3U. 'r,ange 24. in �noka Count��, sai� real estate being hereinafter called Prerr�ises: and WHEREAS, Tt►e Citti• desires permission to enter upon certain portions of said Premises ta construct. maintain and operate a storm water sewer and casing pipe to be iocated in the Board's k'aterworks Right-of-Flay adjacent to Osborne Road immediatel�• west of Main Street; and iv'HEREAS, The $oard is Filling to grant saici permission to the Cit}- consistent �;ith the requirements and safety of the worl:s of the Board; no�, therefore, bc. it AGREED, In curisideration of the metual promises and agreements of the parties hereto and subiect to all terms and conditions contained in said Apreement bet��een ti�e parties hereto made anci entered into the 'i3th day of tvo�•ember 1963. the Board hereb�- grants to Fermittee the �:ermission to enter upon lhe uecessar}' Uoriions of said F•remises and to there Mithin insCall.-maintain and carr�� out all Board appro��ed operations in respect to tlie folloaTing: 6A 0 1. The Board hereby grants to the City the riRht to construct. operate and maintain a 15-inch p.v.c. storm Water se�er pipe to be located as shown on attached Exhibit "A". Said storm uater seWer pipe shall be installed in a steel casing pipe (20-inch to 30-inch diameter) to be jacked under the Board's two 60-inch `conduits at the depth shoWn on said Exhibit "A". A minimum one foot clearance between casing pipe and conduits is required. 2. Upon notification by the City or City's contractor, the Board Will locate existing conduits in the field. No heavy equip�ent will be permitted to operate over or Within five feet of the Board's conduits. and be it further AGREED, That it shall be the responsibility of the City to obtain all licenses or permissions necessary from any and ail ather public agencies and private parti�s thaF inay be r.ffected by or have 3n interest in the in�tallation and operation of said aforementioned vublic facilities. This Agreement is made and eaecuted pursuant to and under the authority of Resolution �umbered adopted b�• the Board of ti'ater Gommissioners of the Cit�� of �aint Paul on the .___� da�• of , 1989, and of a Resoiution adonted by the Cit�• Council of the City of Fridley on the da�� of , 1989, copies of sa;d resolutions being annexed hereto and by this reference made part t,ereof tne sart,e as if set forth l,erein ��ertatim. -2- . � 0 Zr �ITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have executed these pr.esents in triplicate the day and year first above Written. APP�'.0 �"ED : Tho^�as D. ?�1ogr�n. General �ianager Ap�ro�'ed as to rorm: Assistant CitS� Attornev CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA By William J. Nee, Mayor By Willia� Burns� City Manager BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS OF THE CIT� OF SAINT PAliL� MINNESOTA B`. Roger J. Gos�aitz, President gy> Verne E. Jacobsen, Secretary COtTrTERSICIvED: Eugene A. Schiller, Director Department of Finance and Mana�ement Services -3- 6C �': _ �.-� 1 EXISTING 60' WATERMAtNS � I CASlNG PIPE OSBORNEROAD ,��`''vp�'Q' C� � y�� Z , s� ti�OO Ei .. � ,�v V'�'� � ? � �� _ _ � _.._ ---r- i��r r.. • � � \` �� ;' � j e•. 'o �o. . V'`i:: c '� �• -�� / . . � � f � , � . . ; ,,' . ;, :. \ ;. If'•�r•_ '�,��;,�� .i Sj' , � ��+ - _ ..,.. � � --� , ' �°q` v ". � i � � `. � u � ;� , , �! !` ., r 2. Q� �. �v , U �� ,�� ; f �s�, .,,\ pR�� '' C ._ � ,�.' � 1, �+ . C i� O r` � v . � � /� ... . . . . ..:... . . .. ...: ...... . . ... .._. ........ ...... .... ............. ..... . .. . ... ...... ....... ....... ......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... ......................... '.f7.�.�.................. .: . ..... c .. .. ..... ... . .: ... . . . . . ....... ...... ......... . . .. .._. .. . . .... ...... . ... . . ..., :....... .. � ....... .... . :... .. �pP 6�" STEE�. . .. . .... _ ..... . ... _. : :� ... . __......._ - - ..:. � - . . . .. ... ... ....... .. .. : .._ � . : _ . .... ... .......... ..... .... ............ .... ... . ... ..... . . . .....�7��'8.62.::'1:.4�: ... _ . . ......__ . - � ..: _.. . . . . : .. ... ... .. . . 0�T6�: . . =� . ..::' . . . .:.. ... . ....... . .... . . ...... . .... . . .. . . . .. .. _ . ;.. , . .. . ... ... . _ . _ .. . . ;..... TO. ' 0':'STEEt �PIPE �86 � .. .... .. .. _ .: . ... ......... .. .....: . .. ... .. _. .. ... ............ . . . . . . .. . .. . .: . ; . . . .:.............................:.. ..........................:. .... ......................:....... ....................:.. ............. ....... ...:.. ....... . . .................... . .. ......... ....... . .:. :.� s o . ..�.. . . � � .. :.. .:: ._. ....: :..:.� :: ::�.: .. . : ; ., ..... . ; _ . :. _ _ ........ . � ......... .. � � ..:. .. . : _ � � . . _ . . . . . • . . . .. :1 8.4:5' '15":�,V.C: �0.2�3G96 : : 1,' �►�IIN. S�PARATtON . C ,_,Os_2 3 8 9� . _ . . . . . .. . . _ . .. �:,..�.r:...�.. ...:.....:::::.:.Y.:..C:.... � .�:.: :.::::::.:::::::. :.:.:...:......:.::.::. ... .....T.:.G::.:.�.6.6=0.0.......:.:.....::.. .�5.a .::...:...: ..... .. :.... : . ....:... .... . . ...... ........... .... ... . .... . .. . .. . .... . ... .... .... .. .:. . : ... ... : .. . jNV: 862,.05 . : . ......... . : .... ... :... �NV. 85�.�9�;..... .. _. . � . _ � • : . . . .......... :.... ... ... ........ ........... ........ .. . ... . . .. .... . . � . . . • .. ..... . . ... . .:. ... : ............ .... .... ..... .:.... .......CASII�G �PtPE . .. . . . ... .. . . . ... . _ . . . .... ...... ... . . . : : . ... . ..... .. ... .. : : . . : .. . . . . : .... . .. . : . .. _ : .. , . ,. .._ : .. : ... : _. . �- .. : . : EXHIBIT.:: A :: RESOLIITION NO. - - 1989 RESOLIITION AIITHORIZING THE CITY OF FRIDLEY TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ST.. PAIIL BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS (SIBTH' RIDER) WHEREAB, the City Council desires permission to enter upon a certain portion of the St. Paul Board's premises to construct and maintain a 15-inch storm sewer line; and WHEREAB, the storm sewer line is to be canstructed in the Board's waterworks right-of-way north of Osborne Road and west of Main Street; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the storm sewer improvements will accommodate future development of the area and will be in the public interest and welfare of the City of Fridley. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Fridley authorizes entering into the above-mentioned agreement. 2. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute the agreement providing for the planned storm sewer pipe. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY, 1989. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 6E 7 ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL RAlLROAD AUTHORITY STUDY GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL RAtLROAD AUTHORITY AND CiTY OF _FRIDLEY THiS AGREEMENT, entered into this � 5 day of May , 1989, by and between the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority, he�einafter referred to as the "ACRRA," 8t1d th@ Cltjl Of _ FridleY WHEREAS, ACRRA is authorized by Minn. Stat. Ch.398A to work with municipalities for the purposes enumerated in Ch. 398A and to disburse funds to be used in the exercise of its powers; and, WHEREAS, ACRRA has determined that disbursement of 50% of costs up to $3,000 to interested municipalities w+thin Anoka County desiring to study the potential benefits of light rail transit to their communities will significantly assist ACRRA in the potential development of a light rail transit system serving Anoka County; and, WHEREAS, ACRRA has offered to make and Grantee has applied for an ACRRA Study Grant; and, WHEREAS, ACRRA has reviewed the application and desires to assist the Grantee by the award of such an ACRRA Study Grant; and, WHEREAS, this grant agreement is intended to cover the distribution of funds pursuant to the ACRRA Study Grant. NOW, THEREFORE, the ACRRA and Grantee agree as follows: AUTHORIZED USE OF GRANT PROCEEDS All grant funds must be used to study the potential effects of a light rail transit system on the Grantee. tn accordance therewith, the Grantee agrees to do and perform the work program activities described in Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. The Grantee is authorized to use the grant funds only in payment of the line item costs as specified in Appendix B, attached hereto and incorporated herein. No other use of grant funds is permitted. GRANT AMOUNT A. Total Grant Amount. ACRRA shall pay to the Grantee 50°6 of Grantee's actual costs for grant activities up to a total grant amount of $ 3, o00 In no event will ACRRA's obligation unde► this agreement exceed the total grant amount. � B. Distribution of Grani Funds. The grant iunds shall be paid ta.the Grantee within 10 days after full execution of this agreement. , � C. Grantee's Match. The Grantee has an obligation under this Agreement to provide equal expenditures for the activities for which the grant is -2- 7A made. The Grantee agrees to provide for at least 50% of its actual costs for grant activities. III. ACCOUNTING A. Accounts and Records. The grantee agrees to establish and maintain accurate and complete, separate accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of all grant funds and matching Grantee expenditures. These accounts and records shall be retained by the Grantee for at lease a period of three years following the Grant Agreement End Date. B. Audit. The above accounts and records of the Grantee shaN be audited in the same manne� as all other accounts and records of the Grantee are audited, and may be audited, copied and/or inspected on Grantee's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations designated and authorized by ACRRA staff at any time foNowing reasonable notification during the grant period for a pe�iod of three years following the grant agreement and date. IV. REPORTS A. The Grantee shall provide ACRRA a report within 30 days following expenditure of grant funds. B. The Grantee agrees to report completely and to provide ACRRA with any additional or follow-up information as may be requested by ACRRA. V. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. Completion of Work Procaram Activities. The Grantee agrees to complete the work program activities described in Appendix A by no later than , 1989 (hereinafter "Grant Agreement End Date"). B. Reaayment of Unexaended Funds. All grant funds not expended by the Grant Agreement End Daie shall be repaid to ACRRA within 60 days of said End Date. C. Noncompliance bv Grantee. In the event that ACRRA finds that the�e has been a failure to comply with any provision of this ag�eement, ACRRA may terminate the agreement at any time following seven days' written notice to the Grantee and upon failure of the Grantee to cure the default within such seven-day period. Nothing herein shall be construed �o: as to limit the ACRRA's legat remedies to recover grant funds. • D. Termination bv Grantee. This agreement may be terminated by the Grantee at any time upon seven days' written notice to ACRRA. !n the event of such termination, the Grantee agrees to repay ACRRA and any -3- and ali grant funds received by the Grantee, provided, however, that ACRRA may waive repayment of funds expended in accordance with the terms of this ag►eement. E. Unauthorized Use of Grant Proceeds. Upon a finding by ACRRA staff that the Grantee has made an unauthorized o� undocumented use of grant proceeds and a demand for repayment, the Grantee agrees to promptly repay such amounts to ACRRA. F. Amendments. The terms of this agreement may be changed o� modified by mutual agreement of the parties hereto. Such changes or modifications shall be effective only upon the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of ACRRA and the Grantee. G. Eaual Emqloyment Oeportunitv; Af�rmative Action. The Grantee agrees to comply with atl applicable laws, rules or regulations �elating to nondiscrimination and affirmative action. In particular, Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, or participant in this project because oi race, creed, color, religion, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, disability or national origin. This Agreement may be cancelled or terminated by ACRRA and all money due or to become due he�eunder may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the terms or conditions or the subdivision. IN W(TNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the day and year first written above. ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAI APPROVED AS TO FORM: RAILROAD AUTHORITY By: By: Title: Date: GRANTEE By: TItl2: William J. Nee, Mayor Date: May ] S , 1989 � APPENDIX A ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY STUDY GRANT WORK PROGRAM �� (This work program must show the activities and goals for which grant funds will be used, the time schedule involved, and the individuals participating) City of Fridley Preliminary Design Technical Advisory Committee: Steve Billings, Councilmember Donald Betzold, Planning Commission Chairperson Jock Robertson, Community Development Director GOALS 1. Inspect and compare the characteristics, including the advantages and disadvantages, of operating light rail transit (LRT) system in the following three cities: A. Calgary, AZberta B. Portland, Oregon C. San Diego, California 2. Evaluate and apply the planning and operating implications of the above characteristics to the preliminary design process for the northeast corridor. May 2, 1989 May 3, 1989 ACTIVITIES Light Rail Transit Systems Tour Leave Minneapolis at 8:40 a.m., Delta #1859 Arrive in Salt Lake City at 10:15 a.m. Leave Salt Lake City at 11:09 a.m., Delta #1784 Arrive in Calgary at 1:10 p.m. 2:30 p.m. - 10:00 p.m., tour all 17.9 miles of Calgary LRT system. Inspect typical stations, interview citizens, meet with transit officials. Leave Calgary at 8:30 a.m., Canadian Air �125 Arrive in Vancouver at 8:50 a.m. Leave Vancouver at 10:30 a.m., Delta �1442 Arrive in Portland at 11:30 a.m. 7C Appendix A; Activities Page 2 May 3, 1989 (cont') 7D 1:30 p.m. - 9: 0o p.m. , tour all 16 miles of Portland LRT system. Inspect typical stations, interview citizens, meet with transit officials, and Gresham city councilmembers and staff. May 4, 1989 Leave Portland at 11:15 a.m., United #1269 ,�rrive in San Francisco at 12:55 p.m. Leave San Francisco at 1:25 p.m., United #1157 Arrive in San Diego at 2:54 p.m. 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., tour all 16 miles of San Diego LRT system. Inspect typical statians, interview citizens, meet with transit officials. May 5, 1989 9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m., meet with transit officials. Leave San Diego at 2:00 p.m., Northwest #196 Arrive in Minneapolis at 7:27 p.m. a APPENDIX B ANOKA COUNTY REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY STUDY GRANT BUDGET (This budget must show how both the grant funds and matching grantee funds will be used) BUDGET Travel Lodging Meals Miscellaneous TOTAL City share at 50 percent =$2,443 County share at 50 percent =$2,443 $3,795.00 779.00 196.00 116.00 $4,886.00 7E ANOKA COUNTY REGI4NAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY (ACRRA) Paul McCarron, Ghairman ban Erhart Netalie Haas Steffen Nick Cenaiko Wiiliam W. Burns Manager, City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 ' Dear Bilf: Mupua! L,n�feld� Vics Chatnnen Bob Burman .Rm A. Kordiak Aprii 18, 1989 Please find attached a letter that was sent out to Councilpe�son Billings and Jock Robertson regarding the upcoming light rail transit tour of Calgary, Portland, and San Diego. Please note that each participant is asked to make their own reservations as soon as possible or contact Anita or Mary Jo at General Tour Services in order to reserve their seat and take advantage of afrline discounts. Each participant will be responsible for their own tour costs. I have enclosed for your informaiion the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority Study Grant Agreement Between Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority and your city. I would ask that you would please encourage your participant to make their flight arrangements as soon as possible. As always, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. TY:nb Enclosure Sincerely, �--i- � ' ��"'� Tim Yanto Deputy County Administrator Telephone (612) 421-4760, extension 1171; Fax (612) 422-751 � Anoka County Courthouse, Administration Office, 325 E. Main Street, Moka, MN 55303 7F Aptii 17, 1989 ^F1 ^ ^ F2 ^ ^ F3 ^ Dear ^ F4 ^ : We have been informed that you will be participating in the light rail transit systems tour of Calgary, Portland, and San Diego. The attached flight schedule was developed to ailow for review of each system. Please note. Because some of the participants have requested to make their own reservations, we are asking each participani to make their own flight arrangements as soon as �ossible in order to reserve your seat and to take advantage of airline discounts. Or, you can contact Anita Ridge or Mary Jo Ness of Grand Tou� Service at 338-5550. Both Anita and Mary Jo are familiar with ihe tour and would be happy to make your arrangements. We will be booki�g a block of rooms at hotels in each location and informing you of these aRangements and the itinerary ior the tour in the very near future. Each participant will be responsibte for costs involved with the touc Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. TY:nb Enclosure Sincerey, Tim Yantos Deputy County AdminisVator � 7G .� May 2, 1989 May 3, 1989 May 4, 1989 May 5, 1989 Light Rail Transit Systems Tour Leave Minneapolis at 6:40 a.m., �Ue�ta ;#�18a9 A�rive in Satt Lske City at 10:15 a.m. Leave Salt Lake City 11:09 a.m., Delta �1784 Arrive in Calgary at 1:10 p.m. Leave Calgary at 8:30 a.m., £�a�lian Ait �t25 Arrive in Vancouver at 8:50 a.m. Leave Vancouve� at 10:30 a.m., �I� �1442 _ _ Arrive in Portland at 11:30 a.m. Leave Portland at 11:15 a.m., �3niied �'i269 __ :.. .. ..::._.__ ... Arrive in San Francisco at 12:55 p.m. Leave San Francisco at t:25 p.m., �nited �115T Arrive in San Diego at 2:54 p.m. Leave San Diego at 2 p.m., �+iofthtives�;.��96 Arrive Minneapolis at 7:27 p.m. I� � 7H OUSING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORiTY COMMISSION MEMBERS: LAWRENCE COMMERS, CHAtRMAN DUANE PRAEtE VIRGNIA SCHNABEL �NALTER RASMUSSEN JOHN MEYER CITY OF FRIDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: SIIBJECT: May 12, 1989 �p� . rr William Burns, City Manager,�• Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA Chanqe Order #5: Landscape & Irrigation Improvements - Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1988 - 1& 2 The terms of the development agreement between the Fridley HRA and Narthwest Racquet, Swim & Health Club, Inc., and Moore Lake Associates stipulates that $95,000.00 of landscape and irrigation improvements are to be installed by the City. Due to favorably low unit prices, $79,184.00 is the total of the scope of the work as bid. To satisfy the agreement, at their May llth meeting, the HRA approved a change order for the addition of 10,009.8 sq. yd. of sod at $1.58 per sq. yd. for a total amount of $15,815.50. JR:ls M-89-230 EXECUTIYE DIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON 6431 UNIYERSiTV AVE. (612� 57 t-3450 FRIOLEY, MN 55432 EXT. 117 Enginecr�ng Sewc� Walcr Parks Slreets Mainle�ancc � MEMORANDUM TO: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director PW89-97 FROM: Jon Thompson, Estimator & Construction Inspector DATE: April 28, 1989 SIIBJECT: Landscape & Irrigation Improvements - Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1988 - 1& 2 The terms of the development agreement between the Fridley HRA and Northwest Racquet, Swim & Health Club, Inc. and Moore Lake Associates stipulates that $95,000.00 of landscape and irrigation improvements are to be installed by the City. Due to favorably low unit prices, $79,184.00 is the total of the scope of the work as bid. To satisfy the agreement, we are proposing a change order for the addition of thirty-two (32) Prairie Fire Crab Trees at $157.50 each, sixteen (16) Sugar Time Crab Trees at $157.50 each and 5,225 Sq. Yd. of Sod at $1.58 per Sq. Yd. for a total amount of $15,815.50. Recommend the Fridley HRA approve this change order at the May 11 meeting so that it may be processed by the City Council at their May 15, 1989, meeting. JT/ts : ' � �'L � CITY OF FRIDLEY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE., N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 May 15, 1989 C:S. McCrossan Const. Co., Inc. P.O. Box 247 Maple Grove, MN 55369 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 5, Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1988 - 1& 2 Gentlemen: ; � You are hereby ordered, authori2ed, and instructed to modify your contract for the Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1988 - 1& 2 by adding the following work: Addition• APPROX. ITEM 4UANTITY 1. Prairie Fire 32 ea. Crab Trees 2. Sugar-Time Crab Trees 16 ea. PRICE $157.50 157.50 AMOUNT $ 5,040.00 2,520.00 3. Sod 5,225 sq. yd. 1.58 8,255.50 TOTAL ADDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15�815.50 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS: Original Contract amount. . . . . . . . . . . .$ 851,807.20 Contract Additions - Change Order No. 1. ... 13,901.00 - Change Order No. 2. ... 22,857.30 - Change Order No. 3. ... 52,095.50 - Change Order No. 4. ... 47,109.75 - Change Order No. 5. ... 15,815.50 ' REVISED CONTRACT AMOIINT $1,003,586.25 �=__=_ C.S. McCrassan Const. Co., Inc. Page Two Change Order No. 5 May 15, 1989 0 Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, on Approved and accepted this c� N� day of a 1 q S , 1989, by � C.S. MCCROSSAN CONST. CO., INC. _� � Thomas Kenney, Pr ' t Manager Approved and accepted this day of , 1989, by CITY OF FRIDLEY William J. Nee, Mayor William W. Burns, City Manager 8C IEngineenng �Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance MEMORANDUM . TO: William W. Burns Cit Mana er �� PW89-107 , Y 9 FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director Bob Nordahl, Operations Analyst DATE: May 10, 1989 BIIBJECT: Fridley Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189 - Change Order No. 8 To date, the Fridley Municipal Center Improvement Project No. 189 has seven (7) change orders previously received and approved by the City Council. Change Order No. 8 consists of Proposal Request Nos. 6, 20, 33, 38, 50, 68, 71, 72 for a total cost of $16,676.00. These requests consist of miscellaneous changes such as down spouts, stone and masonry work, ramp fencing, dry wall work, etc. It would be appropriate for the City Council to receive and approve Change Order No. 8. The attached change order identifies the proposal requests and work order cost for the renovation project within the three (3) categories of Municipal Center ($12,817), Fire Station ($0) and Parking Ramp ($3,859). JGF/BN/ts Attachments 0 FW� CITY OF FRiDIEY IIdGIlJE��1G L�PAF�TI' 6431 UNIVFF�SITY AVE., N.E. FRIDIEY, MN 55432 � May 15, 1989 Kraus-Arr3erson Qonst. Co. 525 So. Eic�th St. Mii1T2e.apolis, MN 55404 S[JHJECT: Criange Order No. 8, Pt�aposal Request Nos. 6, 20, 33, 38, 50, 68, 71, and 72 for the Fridley Municipal Center I�rave�Zt Project No. 189 Genttemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized, ar�d instruc.-ted to modify your oontract for the FYidley Municipal Center Im�rovement Project No. 189 by addirig the follawing work: Addition• P.R. �_ IZ'IIK SUBOONI�tAG'I�OR ANR7CJI� �I'AL 6. Stone arx�horirig Jesoo, Inc. 429.00 $ 429.00 20. Masonry piers Jesc�o, Inc. 7,299.00 33. 38. 50. 68. 71. 72. Chain link fexioe - r'a� Dry vit syst�n Maso�nYy w�rk - old prirYt iroarn Electzical char�ges Elevator iroo�tt Structural steel - extx'a Panel doors - Cbuncil Chamber Grariote Iron Keller Fei�o�e Co. Roanoke Bldg. U�. Jes�o, Inc. Gephart Elec. Grariot�e Iran Oo0..tntry C�bi.r�ets, Ir�c. Glew4ae Doois, ITrC. 301.00 $ 7,600.00 3,859.00 3,859.00 1,154.00 1,154.00 139.00 $ 139.00 895.00 895.00 2,254.00 2,254.00 161.00 185.00 't�0►I'AL ADDl'I'I� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '•.. 346.00 $16,676.00 9A Kraus-Ar�derson Page Z�ao C1�ange Order No. 7 � � • ►• e� � • i �-�. . � Original Car►tract amo�mt. . . . . . . . . . . . Contract Additions - Ct�a�e Order No. 1. ... - Q�ange Order No. 2. . . . - Cx�at�ge Orclex No. 3. . . . - (�aryge OYder No. 4. . . . - Char�ge Order No. 5. . . . - Q1ar�ge Order No. 6. . . . - Ct�ange Order No. 7. . . . - �ange Order No. 8. . . . 'J � �1J1� •�; 'J• • II $3,419,170.00 16,570.00 8,975.00 21,157.00 30,700.00 31,000.00 51,486.43 35,457.16 16,676.00 $3,631,191.59 5'�nitted ar�d approved by Jahn G. Flora, Public Works Director, on th�e 15th of 1989. Pared bY ChecJced by -..; � - . -. Jahn G. FZora, P.E. DirectAr of Public Works day of , 1989, by �v v• i�_ i�,�+�.c �; � r, ti •• 'I�lil S3Ckie� � PY'Oj t'cIt M82]c1CJer Approved arr3 aoaept.ed this 15th day of May, 1989, by .�+44 !�' ��_�� _� Willi.aan J. Nee, Mayor Willi�a W. �s, City Manager � � RESOLUTION NO. -1989 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS 1�iND SPECIFIC2lTIONS .AND ORDERING PiDVERTISEI�NT FOR BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 2, SATELLITE FIRE STATION WHEREAS, the construction of a Satellite Fire Station has been deemed to be in the interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Fridley; and WHEREAS, a copy of the plans and specifications for the Satellite Fire Station, together with a proposal for the method of payment thereof, has been presented to the City Council by the City Manager, and the same are hereby approved and adopted as the plans and specifications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, that sealed bids for the construction of a Satellite Fire Station be received and opened on June 6, 1989. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is directed and authorized to advertise for the construction of a Satellite Fire Station by sealed bid proposals under notice as provided by law and the Charter of the City of Fridley; the notice to be substantially in form as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part of by reference. Said notice to be published at least three times in the official newspaper of the City of Fridley. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CZTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1989 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK l l�� CITY OF FRIDLEY BID NOTICE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SATELLZTE FIRE STATION EXHIBIT "A° The City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota will accept sealed bids for Construction of a Satellite Fire Station on June 6, 1989 until 11:00 a.m. on said date at the Fridley Civic Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432 (telephone 571-3450). All bids must meet the minimum requirements of the specifications. Failure to comply with this Section can result in disqualification of the bid. Each bid shall be accompanied k Check, Cash or Bid Bond and made � City of Fridley, Minnesota, in � percent (5�) of the bid, which fortified if bidder neglects or after his bid has been accepted. �y a Certified Check, Cashier's �ayable without conditions to the �n amount of not less than f ive check, cash or bond shall be refuses to enter into contract, The City reserves the right to accept the bid which is determined to be in the best interests of the City. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and waive any informalities or technicalities in any bid received without explanation. The City Council also reserves the right to consider such factors as time of delivery or performance, experience, responsibility of the bidder, past performance on similar types of construction projects, or other similar factors that it may determine to be in the best interest of the City. Copies of the specifications and in the office of the Fire Chief, office of the City Manager. general conditions may be examined or copies may be obtained from the All bids must be submitted in sea2ed envelopes and plainly marked on the outside with CONSTRUCTION OF A SATELLITE FIRE STATION. William W. Burns City Manager Publish: 10A TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D II M �� WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER �. TERRANCE J. KUCERA, MEDIA SPECIALIST MAY 11, 1989 DICTATION EQUIPMENT > �1� r . 0 w On Thursday, May 11, 1989, we conducted the bid opening for the Municipal Center Dictation Equipment at 11:OOam in the office of the City Manager. We received one bid from Wahl & Wahl Inc. as follows: Total Trade-In Base Bid $18,755.50 5400.00 $18,355.50 It is my recommendation that the City Council award the base bid to Wahl & Wahl Inc. for a total of $18,355.50. This price includes installation along with a one year maintenance contract that includes parts and Iabor. VENDOR BID PROPOSALS FOR MUNICIPAL CENTER DICTATION SQIIIPMENT THIIRSDAY, MAY 11, 1989, 11:00 A.M. BID BOND '.r. Paul Molitor 5� �;ahl & Wahl Inc. 9333 Penn Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55431 :;s. Bethann Froistad No Bid �ictaphone Y801 West 81st Street Suite 119 :;inneapolis, MN� 55437 '•ir. Wally Hood No Bid �conomy Dictation Systems, Inc. 7701 Cahill Road �dina, MN 55435 BASE BID $18,355.50 11A COMPLETZON 10 Business Days MEMO TO: WILLIAM W. FROM: WILLIAM C. SUBJECT: DATE: ��. BURNS, ITY MANAGER� /�j"G�-� HUNT',' ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER 12 FRIDLEY PARTICIPATION IN "CELEBRATE MINNESOTA 1990" MAY 4, 1989 In July of 1988 Governor Perpich proclaimed a year of celebration for the State of Minnesota which he named "Celebrate Minnesota 1990." This is intended to be "a statewide celebration built around community activities�� which will showcase "the best of our state to visitors, including thousands of visitors attending the U.S. Olympic Festival. Official member communities are eligible for grants to assist with community improvement projects in conjunction with "Celebrate Minnesota 1990." The Fridley Historical Society would like to apply for a grant to help with the landscaping of their historical museum. However, in order to apply for the grant, it is necessary for the City to be an official member. Fern Moe, President of the Fridley Historical Society, has requested that the Council authorize the Mayor to sign the attached membership form. By doing so the City will become an official member community for "Celebrate Minnesota 1990," and the Historical Society will be eligible to apply for a grant. I request that this be presented to the Fridley City Council for consideration at their meeting of May 15, 1989. 12A (This is not a grant application) Only official member communities will be eligible for special highway entrance signs, use of Celebrate Minnesota 1990 logos and listings in Celebrate Minnesota 1990 publications. To become a member, please provide the following information: Name of Community Fri dl ey Description of community improvement project or activity. (Provide as much detail as possible; please use extra sheets. However, your project does not need to be in final form. Your goal is what is important.) Landscaping and beautification of grounds of Fridley Historical Society Museum. Name and type of celebration planned for 1990, if different from above: Fridlev '49er Davs June 13 - 17, 1990 Name of organization that will supervise project. (The project can be undertaken by a service club, school or other organization, but it must have the endorsement of your mayor or city council.) Fridley Historical Society Approved by mayor or president of city council: Signature Mayor Title Mav 15, 1989 Date Person who should receive mailings from Celebrate Minnesota 1990. (Include address and zip code.) Jack Kirk 6431 Universitv Avenue N.E. Fridlev, MN 55432 Mail to: Celebrate Minnesota 1990 900 American Center Building 150 East Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (Charter member communities need not reapply) 12B � �� `� -�." - . __- �� ... '� .y,��L=°�.�� `�� WHEREAS: INirwesota hns a rich heritage. drawn from many nations in nany parts or the �uoNd. and Alinnesotaru actitely aeek Lo presena htatoric aitea, cuatoma aM traditiaw; and WNEREAS: Mtnnesota's mi,rture of ethnic backgrowds, ard iW wried snv[ronment or urban and nval aetttngs. loreats and fnrms. Wkes and H�ero, Ms rewlted in a atate of direrse Lradidau. atrong wlues md stronp commudties: aM WHEREAS: The leaderahip oj willing citizens is the backbone o( strong oomr+�ueittea butli on timeless wlues but shaping their own futw�ea In the 21at ceniury: md W9EREAS: The year 1990 ojfers an escel[ent opportuniry w auesa 1Nirmeaota'a paat, preasnt ond promtse for the future through partictpGtion In a siatewide celebmtion built arowid commviity actf�tties: m�d WHEREAS: Participation by ail comm+niLtes in auch a celebnation wlil dmw AlWteaotans togethe� (n a common purpose o% aho�urnsing the best of our atate to �tattoro, includirtp thouaarads o% �tstiors attending the U.S. Olympic Featiwl: NOW, THfiREFORE, 1, Rudy Perpich, Governo� of the State o% Ninnesoia, do hereDy prociatm 1980 Lo be a mtd do (urther proclaim Y 6 A R O F C B L fi B R A T I O N CBLBBRA 7'S YIN NSSOTA 1 D�0 as the ojllctol mme ol thts celebratton. r further wge alt A(tnnesotans mid ai[ NWtesota comm�nities ard �ighborhoods to plan apeMal evenu, vdertake co�nmv�fty tmprovementa mrd fm+ite �isftors w Ninnesota in 1990. I cull upon commudty leaders and Mtizen wluiteers to participate tn CBLEBRATE AIINNESOTA 1990, �d tp use the name, ihemes ard symboW oj ihis celebrvttorc fn Lhetr comm�nttiea. 1N WITNESS W96RSOF. I Inve hers�otto set my � z,�, .,` .� . hard md ccuaed the Grect Seni of the State of ��. MinneJOta to be aflixed ut the State caPtw[ �''. thia twentieth day of July in the yeur of �,- ' Wir Lord one thouanM n[ne fwndred and eipltty- eight, avui of the State the one ►wrdred thtKieth. �� "` � '�+ • � "-::; � ��-.,�� 4:,. ,� � � O V S R N � SECRETARY OF STATE � 12C Minnesoca Deparnnenc of Trade and Economic Developmenc 900 American Center l50 Easc Kellogg Boulevard Sc. Paul, Minnesoca Si101 FOR USE �F'I�3t 9 A.M. ZIi�JRSDAY. FF�. 23. 1989 Q�TI'ACT: Robert Benr�er (612) 296-5005 Maureen Flahaven (612) 297-1990 ARE'A RD�'1VE CEI£f�iATE M�if50TA 1990 GRArflS ST. PAUL (Febzvaxy 23, 1989) — Eic�ty-fvur oannuiities �cut the state -- r�ir�g fram D�arlee witi! a populatian of 129 to the 'ITain Cities suburb of Woodbuiy -- have been awat�ded Celebrate � 1990 cJrants to assist with a variety of aaanmity i.mpr�ovarent project.s. �e grant recipients re�Qresent a cros.s secticci of MCinnesata c�atauiities -- fzran large to small, fraa zuzal to uzi�an, frcin oa�e bor�s of the state to the other, a000rdir�q to Robert Benner, deputy oaianissioner in the Muu�esota Depattment of Trade ar�d E�ooa�omic Develo�nent, th� state ageix.y that's ac�ninisterit�g the proqz-am. C.armunities in this area i�eoeivir�g qrants inc2ude: (Newsp�aper editars -- See attaci�ed list for caatnmities, gzant �a.vits ar�d praject descriptions. ) Maureen Flahaven, e�oewtive direct�or of Celebrate Miru�esota, said the P�J�► Was latu�c3�,ed nearlY t� Years ago bY Gov. Ruciy P�erpich to draw Minnescta ar�d its t�wns arid cities tagether in a yearlorg festival of celebration. It has stirred enthusiasm fmn cannnuzities tturo�t�ot�t the state, she P+dd�ed. The TJTED C�ity Development Divisirn, which Benner dir�ects, reviewed qrant applications fram 328 ocmau�ities, or almost 40 peroent of all Minnesota oa�ities. �he applicatians were sukmitted in De�oanber by oacmunities wantirg to participate in ti�e Proqram bY organizircJ azrl oaq�let?r9 inQrovement ar�d beautification pavojects by 1990 ard then platmirrq velebratic�ns tied to those ptojec.'ts. --over-- 12D Paqe 2 'Ilie 1988 Leqislature authorized S700,000 in state tlarls to be awarded for Celebl3te MIf rnesota 1990 pzcjects in 1989 ; 9rat�ct z�equests far state sz�ort rpaciLed S3,3S1,925. �e leqislative statvte said that qrants were to be limited to S25, 000 per ca�aatity at�d that t2�y 1a�st be matci�ed 3-to-1 with local Ru�ds or efforts. Iocal c�a¢mi�ents for ca�nmity prcjects, aaupled with the state s�port that was sax�t, tortaled an astaund.inq $16 . 4 million. DTED O�missicn�.r David J. S�eer said, "We have been absol�te2y delighted with the oar�auty z�a�se to Gelebrate Minnesata 1990. '�e response has demonstrated the entin�siastic spirit and pride that aze prevalent in Mi.tutescta. �� Many oaanunities that did rx�t reoeive f�ding are sca�i.ng back their projects and hq�e to ac�oan�Iish then ca� their v�m. Efforts also are beiryq made to match unfta�ed applicarrts with ctiyer souroes for assistanoe. Henner said there also is a c3�anc�e that additian3l dollazs will be ea,rmarked by the 1989 Legislature for anather rcxa�d of fundinq. "The suooess of the proqram has pz+c�ted the qwernor to seek additional grant moazies fran the leqislature, �ich, if apprwed, wtuld pesmit another fundin4 cycle �cl�isx� the i989-90 fiscal year," he explair�e�d. Celebrate Minn�sa�ta 1990 evmits, ir�cludin� the U.S. Olyc�ic Festival-'90, will oa�ir � the ye�ar. �,e Oly�pic Festival, which wi21 attract thaisarr3.s ot sports spectatozs ar�d participants fran thrax�aut the oa.mtzy, will take plaoe in J�ly oi 2990 in the Ztain Cities. Flahaven said o! OeZebrate Minnesota 1990: "Our statewide eve�ts plaru�ed for 1990 are beom�in� mere diver�,,e ar�d excitinq. Arts oz�anizations, sports everrt planr�ers and eezpozate leadexs have irdicated they want to be involved in sc��edulirg creative ev�ents to be include�d in this yearlonq festiv�2.. �� A total ot 388 camu�ities 2�av�e signed up t�o be Gelebzate Miru�esota 1990 menber va�c�tities . —30— 12E «�1 a1:+� • �� la. • v • � r.' • � � �I�.. AI�T: InQrove Nbrin Lake, variaus larxL�caP�J� ��J with a celebratiori durirg Mr�rin Iake Days, 53.315. ALUARADO: Paint potato war�ehouses, ia�rove approaches to city with trees ar�d flow�ers, remove a small junk area and demolish old building, $9,930. ARLII�1GTnN: Improve city librazy and park, new larxLscaped entranoes to the city, $6,250. AUIC� ZC7WNSI�P: Rer�vation of Autanba Z�ownship park arid rest area, deaalish old buildings, $2,381. BAGIEY: Bric�ten dvwnt.awn with plaritings ar�d in�rwe facilities in City park in 1989, $7,988. BALAT�ON: Park it�rov�nents includir�g wheelchair path frest► Hic�way 14 to f i G�+i � pier, $10, 655 QONS�II'I'I�, BEI�E PLAINE: Construct a ryew grar�dstand ar�d update ball fields, $19,050. BIF�,BIIC: Heritage park and ma.setnn beautification, $25, 000. BLAC�CD[1CK: Cleanup azd beautify Blackd�ck Park ar�d wayside rest ate.a, $4, 917. BOIS Ft�RTE Il�iDIAN RFSERVATION: Beautification of recre,ation a,r�.a, lar�dsc�,aping, new picnic area, sidewalks arxi sodding, $23, 070. : I�rove ar�d beautify Mfinne.sota Avenue, $9, 662 . CAr'�2IDGE: Plan attractive gateways at all four state hiqhway entrances ar�d irivite all Scandinavians to Cambridge S�aedish Festival in 1990, $5,000. Ga,NIDEN ARFA oC�'A�dJNITY QONC�iS oCJ�JNCZL, N�INEAPOLIS : Cleainip of whole area of N.W. Minneapolis with a oelebration on July 19, 1990, $6,000. �i�'P,: Plan twu parks, soenic averlook ar�d woodland trail. Parks include rock autcx�opping above a one-time ste�mboat larrling with a pr�me view of the Mississippi River; Dakata River Festival to velebrate city's heritage in 1990, $4,641. . �a�- - �- . • • -� i:.,.�►r� Cona�a�nity beautification project, $1,160. I�cxetbtive restoration project, $10,000. Cleanup, beautification and cc�arnulity project, $2,493. ST. LlJfJIS OOLTN'i'Y i�ITAGE AND �RIS CF�TTER, DULffIH: Depot renavation and it�rovemetzts, $25, 000. � DUPlOEE: Clean un a►+�1 heautify main street and parks, $3,355. EITZIII: Repair old stone schoolhouse for 1990, ar�d irc�rwe ccr�rn�nity �� 1�� tree planting for Fa�rtt� of July flin Fest, $1, 814 . �� Ip,�: Barxistarxi latxLscapin9 a�1 ��1�� Park playgrautxi, $3►820. �I.SWpl�i: Optiunist Club plans to be prime mwer for new street signs, entrance sz9ns� flags ar�d lighting� with "Celebrate 1990" inco�rated into stimmtier festival, $3,508. gMg�RRASS: Plannin9 a Firuzish Heritage Center and 1�ark►t�► t�ism � �grcn�nd and tourist inforn�ation oenter' to �°�� S busjlless, $15, 322. F�tSKIl�tE DEVEI'I�Pi�1'r CORF ., E�.SKII�TE : EXit Erskine ! NeFr�t ooa�¢ntulitY center, entrr�n�'-e signs arsd Clearnzp► $6, 391. gA��X; �orivert railroad depot into a museum for the Fairfax Historical Society. Depot is on the National Rec�isteY'. Plans to tear dawn two dilapidated buildings ar�d make into mini-park ar�i P�'k�9 �$2 ► 557 . FAII.�N i�IGHTS : Reconstruct f ire-dama9ed cxs�mninitY Pa�'k bzulding. $25,000. FoF�AL1�: I�rwe canmiunitY Park� Picnic shelters and play equiPment, and plant trees ar�d shrubs. Also pianninq a cxe�urnini.tY Picnic ar�d reunion July 4, 1990, $2,355. . GIF�W�OD: Planni.ng a 100-year school reu�uon built axburxi Water�ma Days. Suggestions i.riclude bed-arr3-breakfast sYstem for school visitors in 1990. Also planning a citywide tree plantirxJ Pro7�► $��513. COODVI�T: Diocese Park cleanup ar�d imPrw�nt, $5.484. GREINgUS�I• Create a"welcome par'k" at intersections of Hic�waYs 32 e and raze deteriorated buildin4► old fashioned and 11, install r�w siqnag class reunions, 59,711. Fourth of July celebration, includiryg ��: Improveme�zts to city pax'k, $5, 256. 00. �� ,� �� ,I,I� � Hp�y : Downtc�m beautif ication ar�d Southside Park i�rweme�'►ts, $1 � 197. I�,WI�.'Y: Beautify area that nuvs fresn HighwaY 10 to the block in the center of tam with a new gazebo, $7,954. �g�ta1G: Cle�rn� a�i beautification, $4►788. PIl�tE RIDGE GLiJB, F�N' Plannirx! to i��e an3 maintain Pine Ridge Park, $5,790. Ht7USTON 'ICiWNSI-IIP: Town hall refurbishir�q► $2 � �33. 12G HUIC��TSOrt: ZYee plaritirg, nature trail, walk ar�d bikewaYs� sidewalks thrauc�out city, $23,166. IVAI�iOE: Putting in c�o�¢�unity trailsarid a rest sto�p area, $3, 384. JaRpAN; Iagoon Park ing�rov�tie.nt -- save the falls, $6, 09.2 . Xr�r.r.; �� up ar�d beautify Main Street arxi provide family park facilities, $3,441. I.AI� CTTY: will use "Celebrate" theme for full year of events, rangir�g froan ice-fishing contest in Febxvary to Jahnny Appleseed Days in the fall. Major project will be a bike path, ar�d June Water Ski Days will be the major oelebration, $3,271. IANFSBOR�: Iarr3scape, aixl acld park be.nches ar�d bicycle racks along Root River State Trail, $1,500. IAI� PORT ZC7WNSi�IIP, IAFOKrE: Fireman.s' Park cleanup ar�d beautification, $2,378. LEECH LAI� RFSERVATION: In�rovement alc�ng U.S. 2, where visitors enter the Leech Iake R�eservation a�urninity. Ideas include artistic mural on retail oenter azxi lar�dsc.apir�g, $3, 359. LE RfJY DEVELOPi�Tr OORP. , I�OY: Beautification ar�d i�roveznent thrrxigh lar�dsc.aping and signage at city entrances. Celebration at S�a�¢ner S�ort Festival, $1,900. IE S'UE�JR: Mayo Park arborettan, $12,135. LITTI� CAt�,OA: City enhancezner►t and park i�rovemei�ts, $25, 000. LYLE: Revitalize city park with 4th of July oo�amunity reunion, $4,972. NAi��iCA�3�T: City beautification program arid all-school reunion, $9,228. I�PZE IAI�: Centennial Park impravement project, $5,815. MELR06E: Revitalization -- co�q�rehensive project, $16,317. 1�IIIACA: Zbtal oa�ninity b�utification, includir�q businesses, recreation areas ar�d Highway 169 bypass, $12,934. rD01�1e,D: Vi]cirrg Point Park, Plains Art I�,iseinn, MStT A�hitheater C,b�a�nity oelebration �-- Canpariy's Ccmir�g Valley Fest 1990, $15,100. Nbi7NLLS Vg.W: Silver View Park picnic shelter construction, $4,084. � N)xJN'TAat IlZON: Beautification of US 53, restore historic looa�tion ar�d larrdscapirig projec�ts, $15, 398. I�TRDOCK: Restoration of school ; lar�d arauryd N�i�3ock Ha�se 'will be made into a park, $3,750. . IJEW RI��ND: In�rwe recreational facilities in city park, in�rwe ioe rink, i�rwe city's highway signs ar�d plan a mural. Farm ar�d City Days will be the 1990 oelebration, S5,891. NaR'IIi BEtANCIi: Beautify main street, signs arid parks in�roveznents, $6,435. . NOKi�i ST. PAUL: Cca�¢rninity pride prc�notion ar�d beautification project with variaus ideas for corner of Highway 36 ar�d Margaret, $25,000. - 06Ai�S: Develop a lvcal heritage center, beautification of city entrarioes to oce�utauiity, $6, 433 . PDOPIE OF PHILLSPS NEIC��ORfI00D, SOKJ'IH NQDIIdEAPOLIS : A new entrance on the sauth side, major cleanup azxi beautification of area, $3,675. PZA2t�: City park in�mvement, $16, 324. PORTEEt: Plan citywide beautification effort, including i�rove�lts to city hall ar�d the tawn rest area, $6,925. RE�JWl70D FALLS: Lar�nark preservation, $8,825. �JSH CITY: Beautify Rush Creek, centrally located in the oo�rn�nity. Projects will include a passive park along the creek with plantir�gs ar�d other aesthetic i�rwem�zts, $3, 293 . �7SF�ORD VILLAGE: South Rushfonl oomm�uzity park is planned to have playgraund ar�d picnic areas with equipment; cleanup road signs, $4,053. SACf2ID I�ART: Beautification of Co�urn�nity Center, City Park, Fire Hall and Ball Park, $3,190. ST, CLOUp; 1�huzinger Gardens ar�d Whitney beautification, $4,923. DISTRICT 5 PIArIIdIldG QOLINQL, ST. PAUL: Clean up ar�d beautify vacant areas of the East Side. Celebrate the East Side, $3,644. ST. PEI�R: I�rovirx� ar�d beautification of Historic Minnesota Square Park, $25,000. SAiJK CF�tE: Major park inq�roveznents thrvughaut city, $9, 934. S�,F2D NEIC�EIDOF�IOOD � GROUP, N�1NE'APOLIS : Neic��borhpod c�ainity ttnlz`dl, $2,444. Si�t EYE: Plans depot beautification, larid.scapir�g area arau�ci depot ar�d nprnm�ent. Also planning Sleepy �.ye Collector's Corivention ar�d a �ecial 4th of July event in 1990, $4,963. Q'i�CTAL CLUB, SPICII2: Imprwe city park, install new signs at entrar�oe� alor�q with banners, $8, 353 . STRANDQUIST: Operation Main Street, $17,250. : 12H Si�IIT HILL AS.SOCIATION, ST. PAiJL: Coru�ec.�t oatIItn.uzity park to oa�rninity by develvP�9 Pa��Ys� landscaPin9 the new recreatio� oenter scheduled to be ax�leted in 1990, $2,063. LSON'S CTJJB, St�,NVILLE• Upc�ate Main Street ar�d gark sites, $11,143. TI��t JAYC�E' S, 'I�JN�,N: Dawntc�m Park and Main Street beautificatiori, $4,623. V�tGIlJIA: �hanoe all entrance�rays into city, beautify dc�mtvwn busiriess fronts, a citywide tree planting progr'am, bicycle and fitness areas arxi a city ca�graurr3• Its 1990 celebration will be the "I�nd of the Loon" festival of art.s, crafts ar,d ethnic food.s, $11, 403 . WABASF�,: Beautification, cleanup and signage of entrances, 511,715. i�TERVILi�: Major beautification ar�d clearnip pmjec'ts citywide; direc�tional signage to parks, $10,882. WIlJGgt: Additional expailsion ar�d improvement of Depot Park, $4,950. WpppBURy; Woocmury Days celebration. Park ar�d trail ar3�oretimi concept on City Hall pro�perty, $10,000. 121 14 � � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL Mav 15, 15�� TYPE OF LICENSE: CHARITABLE GAMBLING George's Restaurant 3710 fast River Road Fridley, MN 55421 CIGARETTE George's Restaurant 3710 East River Road Fridley, t�IN 55421 Perkins Restaurant �1041 7520 University Ave., NE Fridley, MN 55432 ENTERTAINMENT George's Restaurant 3710 East River Road Fri dl ey, MPJ 55421 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Central Oriental Foods 6440 l;niversity Ave., N.E. Fridley, P•1N 55432 George's Restaurant 3710 East River Road Fridley, MN 55421 Hardee's 280 - 57th Ave., N.E. Fri d 1 ey, �7N 55432 Lynwood l;eal th Center 5700 East River Road Fridley, MN 55432 Pannekoeken Restaurant 7730 Uhiversity Avenue N.E, Fridley,�MN 55432 Perkins Restaurant #1041 7520 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 7AEH0 Restaurant 6440 University Ave., W.E. Fridlev. MN 55432 BY: Anthony Nicklow Same Perkins Restaurants Operation Co. L.P. Anthony Nicklow Won Jin Choih Anthony Nicklow T. N. P. Inc. LICENSES Page 1 APPROVED BY: . FEES: James P. Hill $300.00 Public Safety Director James P. Hill $24.00 Public Safety Director „ ,� �� Beverly Enterprises-MN Inc. Sharco Inc. Perkins Restaurants Operation Co. L.P. Tae Ho Corp. " $12.OQ " $85.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 $45.00 �15 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COiJNCIL LZCEN8Z8 �'p�y May 15, 1989 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT (Cont'd) Woodcrest Baptist Academy Clarke S. Poorman 6875 University Avenue N.E. Fri�dley, MN 55432 TEMPORARY FOOD PERMIT - Fridley 49er Days Fridley 49ers 1090 Hathaway Lane (Stephen Eggert) Fridley, MN 55432 JUNK YARDS Central Auto Parts North, Inc. 1201 - 732 Avenue N.E. Roger Christenson - Fridley, MN 55432 John Christenson Fridley Auto Parts Leroy T. Haluptzok 7360 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Salvage Center Salvage Center, Inc. 3737 East River Road Fridley, MN 55421 Sai�n's Auto Parts Stanley E. Giddings 1240 - 732 Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 REFUSE HAULER Beckers Sanitation Ronald Beckers 19447 Baugh St., N.W. Elk River, MN 55330 Gallagher Service Inc. Richard Gallagher Jr. 1691 - 91st Ave., N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 Walter's Rubbish George Walter 2775 - l0�st Ave., N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 RETAIL GASOLIN� SAZES Riverside Auto Wash, Inc. Randall R. Olehefske 6520 East River Road Fridley, MN 55432 Page 2 __ Exempt Requesting Fees be waived James P. Hill $350.00 Public Safety Director �� " " $350.00 �� Richard Larson Fire Inspector " $350.00 " $350.00 $75.00 $90.00 $60.00 ,.: $60.00 15A �5B � � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ]3LECTRICAL � Arctic Electric, Inc. 2632 - 8th Avenue North Anoka, NIIJ 55303 By: Reynold Lindberg Blaine Heating, A/C & Electric, Inc. 13562 Central Avenue N.E. Anoka, NIN 55304 By: Kenneth Chouinard DeVice Electric 1828 Jersey Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55426 By: Darrell Vice GAS SERVICES A. Binder & Son, Inc. 222 Hardman Avenue North So. St. Paul, MN 55075 By: Richard Binder Blaine Heating, A/C & Electric, Inc. 13562 Central Avenue N.E. Anoka, MN 55304 By: Kenneth Chouinard C& M Heating & A/C Inc. 12970 Arrowood Lane Dayton, MN 55327 By: Craig Dalbec Dependable Heating & Air Cond. Inc. 2619 Coon Rapids Blvd NW Coon Rapids, MN 55433 By: Thomas Chouinard Economy Gas Installers Inc. 6204 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55410 By: James Toohey Energy Heating Services 14331 Armstrong Blvd N.W. Ramsey, MN 55303 Quality Air, Inc. 7907 - 5th Street N.E. Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 Thompson Air Inc. 5115 Hanson Court Minneapolis, MN 55429 By: Cecil Seals By: Robert Lilya By: Floyd Thompson LICENSEB � 15C State of Minn Same Same WILISAM SANDIN Plbg. Htg.Insp Same Same Same Same Same Same ' Same GENERAL CONTRACTOR The Cities Home Improvement Co., Inc. 5841 Cedar Lake Road St. Louis Park, I�T 55416 By: Marshall Lifson Columbus Construction 2131 - 111th Lane N.W. Coon Rapids, NIIJ 55433 D& D Home Improvement Inc. 7401 Central Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 lst Landmark Builders Inc. 611 South Snelling Avenue St. Paul, MN 55116 By: Larry Columbus By: Donavan Olson By: Gene Markowski Hanggi Building & Remodeling 2901 - 85th Avenue N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 By: Ken Hanggi Kramer Construction P.O. Box 163 Osseo, MN 55369 M & J Home Improvements 946 South Smith West St. Paul, MN 55118 Palmford Construction Co. 19063 Baldwin Street Elk River, MN 55330 Quality Carpentry 4260 Reiland Lane Shoreview, MN 55126 R & M Associates 3482 Auger White Bear Lake, 1�IN 55110 RuHow Co. 10107 Lakeview Drive West Minnetonka, MN 55343 Stockdill Construction 2925 Noble Avenue North Golden Valley, MN 55422 HEATING A Binder & Son, Inc. 222 Hardman Avenue North So. St. Paul, 1�IlJ 55075 By: Joseph Kramer By: Mike Halverson By: Vera Ford By: Daniel Szmiot By: Ray Palme By: Howard Berg By: Jeff Stockdill By: Richard Binder DARREL CLARK :Qiief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same WILLIAM SANDIN p1bg. Htg.Insp. 15D Blaine Heating, A/C & Electric, Inc. 13562 Central Avenue N.E. Anoka, NIId 55304 By: Kenneth Chouinard C& M Heating & A/C Inc. 12970 Arrowood Lane Dayton, NIN 55327 By: Craig Dalbec Dependable Heating & Air Cond. Inc. 2619 Coon Rapids Blvd Coon Rapids, MN 55433 By: Thomas Chouinard Igloo Heating & Air 11440 Lakeland Drive North Maple Grove, MN 55304 By: Don Sufka Maple Grove Heating & Air Cond. 8870 Zealand Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55445 By: Stephen MacDonald Quality Air, Inc. 7907 - 5th Street N.E. Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 Thompson Air Inc. 5115 Hanson Court Minneapolis, MN 55429 By: Robert Lilya By: Floyd Thompson Ray N. Welter Heating Company 4637 Chicago Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 By: Ray Welter Jr. MASONRY Fireplace Construction Co. 7365 Bagpipe Blvd Eden Prairie, NIN 55346 PLUMBING Moundsview Plumbing 3030 - 85th Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55432 Terry Sturm Plumbing & Htg. 2449 Gunflint Trail Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 ROOFING George B. Johnson Roofing 5410 Girard Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 By: Mark Mosman By: John Engberg • By: Terry Sturm By: George Johnson 15E Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same DARREL CLARK Ct�ief Bldg Ofcl State of Minn. Same DARREL CLARK Chie€ Bldg Ofcl SIGN ERECTOR Lawrence Signs Inc. 945 Pierce Butler Route St. Paul, MN 55104 By: Dan Ginkel 15F DARREL CLARK ,Qiief Bldg Ofcl N W H £ 1- N W H i T Q C �1 K o m H .+ M O �0 ? U � 69 •..• O� z a � a o W a L c �. r O i0 � a N � u C O 2 � W U U � U Q i O r a;��s:sa:�::�m=mm�s�ma' 1 B 1 IA �Yl m�MNlfl �1� t�rmA �IAO�mQ� � P I NmYY mY'!,p fl'�1m Y7P�1d1�Y71ANMNl� .+ i MO+1� B�+MIf1�P1At+1�1'�'fP T.DIAf M.O �� ► � n n M M T 1 .O �+M�fNmMM��+ e MNm�+NVI 1 M .� �+�+-+�+NN •.. M M � �+�+N• � 1• M• M M•• ♦ ♦ r M M .i M I • I 1 I M B i M ; .�O h 1'r� 1 .�O 1 + M A i .O ; � N B I� 1 n � M 1 N 1 M N I N 1 N 1 M 1 N I 1 I m 1 m � � 1� 1 m 1 N I i � i� e i� i� i.o i a i a a u� i m a� < i<u i r i v� i ¢ i�� .o i a� u� a� � n i a � m i = i a z � i^ .o -+ i ni i tti i tu i � a � i .► � r� i r� � i j M j~ ~ 1~ I�► I M I 1 I I I I � I i s�i i� m m m�� m�� m m e� m� m m� m i� i v�i i a i i «i i r �uim �r�i �vi �r�{ �a.om �vio��a� i v i o� i m i 1 I MmY) m1APe1'��Y7P''If�OIAIANMNP 1^� 1� 1 m I 1>C � j MMPB�+MQ�mPlf�l'�MM�+T�DYYe1'l.D i O� ; M; N � 1 HQ � I N �P�1 �tN^�MM�+�+ Q^��"1Nm^�NIA 1 1� 1 Q�I d I 1 S Q 1 N M.+wwMN1AM.+ �►MM��+'+NM 1 N 1 1� 1 M I 1 U G7 .D 1 M • M M M• • " + M M M I N I 1� 1.O I 1 . 1 1 M 1 w 1 M I j M j I I M I I 1 Z � 1 Y I W� M 1 r � � ra ev i U 1 � N � 1 1 N I � M 1 1 1 1 1 1 B I 1 N i 1 U W r 1 � .. r ro i 1 � W N 1 1 U U • 1 1 1 1 1 1 I �I I H I II U i O m Uy� •+ Q 4 U ¢ tff W O N B B m B m B B m � � m� mo• � � �m n� m uM'�r°'in a• u� i� cu o� � r� m n a c ni ~ r �i a •• r• a-• ni • M M M M�+ M � �:smmss�ssammm�sa ss'�� f� m Ifl N � If1 .. N Q� 1� �t � m.O If1 � RJ .O Q� li M IAmml'�1�M d�If1m�.G IAf� Y'IP i M� P Q�» B O� .O t� Vf 1+ (Y Q� •• �.D P M.D ' B~�+� �PIA�+Bmw •MI'7w1'�1N1� ^Ifl (u � w M M N` M +� M V M� M M M M M M �► � M M �1 Q� 1 1 t� I N ui i vi i r B i a i � r i v i m M 1 m 1 < M 1 I �► � M � 1 1 1 1 � I r 1 N Q� I M 1 �+ � i T ; f P 1 Y�7 1 Y�7 • I . 1 �► 1 • 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 K J W • E � � � Z 1y Z O S N W O J � U O 1 > � � � N W J Q� ~ O J¢ T� O N W Q W Q U � 2 2 ��l1� U�W ~ 2��2�2��0�� 1� p C C G U m 2� W O��f Y O a H V Q r¢ a U � W F Z� O�J U H O� U W � J ZF ZO��Rf� �UOYZ�Ua.Z.? J g n �Wl � �a i o Wa 2� S S U W~ � O � i O YQQ N�U L'�(.W9�� L� 2� a N� 2 R I � P M m I'�7 � B � � r S �` I�fl � � � ^ ^ � � n MW .�O r N-�+ � Y� 7 N Y� 7 Y 7��. O�+ m m 16A