06/26/1989 - 00006961�
�
�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JUNE 26, 1989
CALL TO ORDER•
Mayor Nee called the June 26, 1989 City Council Conference meeting
to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Mayor Bill Nee
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
None
Nancy Jorgenson
Dennis Schneider
Ed Fitzpatrick
Steve Billings
Others Present: Bill Burns, City Manager
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Jim Casserly, Casserly, Molzahn and Associates
Jerry Best, Attorney for Onan Corporation
Karen Arnold, 1400 - 73rd Avenue N.E., Fridley
MOTION by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Jorgenson, to open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR NEE DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPENED AT 7:35 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE MODIFIED
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE HRA'S REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. l:
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director, stated that
the onan Corporation is currently investigating an option to
develop the southeast 35 acres of it's Fridley complex. It
would include both research and development office and
waTehouse space to accommodate consolidation of all off-site
operations. The early cost estimates indicate project would
fall into the $20,000,00 -$25,000,000 range. Approximately
80 to 90 new skilled and semi-skilled jobs would be created.
Mr. Robertson stated that in order to preserve future options
for assisting in this project, the City and the Housing &
Redevelopment Authority notified the School District and the
County on May 26, 1989 of the intent to hold this hearing and
create the district and also published a notice in the
official newspaper on June 14, 1989 and June 21, 1989. The
e�� �.
��
SPECIAL CITY COIINCIL MEETING, JUNE 26, 1989 PAGE 2
� notice stated that the City intended to hold a public hearing
to consider expanding the Housing & Redevelopment Authority's
development program and establishing a redevelopment tax
increment district.
Mr. Robertson stated that at the June 8, 1989 Housing &
Redevelopment Authority meeting, the members accomplished the
following:
A. Approved modification of Redevelopment District No. 1 and
approved the modified redevelopment plan related thereto;
B. Approved modification of Tax Increment Financing
Districts 1 through 8;
C. Approved and adopted the modified Tax Increment Financing
plans relating thereto;
D. Approved creation of Tax Inorement Financing District No.
9 and approved and adopted the proposed Tax Increment
Financing plan relating thereto;
E. Recommended that the City Council hold a public hearing
1 and the district be established at the June 26, 1989 City
Council meeting.
Mr. Casserly gave a brief history of the Fridley continuing
master district process since May 15, 1979. He stated that
the Tax Increment Financing District No. 9 for Onan
Corporation would be a catalyst for a number of long needed
improvements in that district area. Mr. Casserly stated that
there is no question that the proposed plan and financinq plan
meets all State legal requirements. He noted that newly
proposed State leqislation which was included in the vetoed
omnibus tax bill would have made the Tax Increment Financing
District No. 9 much more difficult to implement. He concluded
that it was prudent for the Housing & Redevelopment Authority
and the City to proceed inasmuch as the vetoed legislation may
be revived.
Councilmember Schneider commented that there appeared to be
no changes to Tax Incremant Districts No. 1 through 8. Mr.
Casserly replied that was essentially correct; but that the
financing plans were being amended to reflect the increased
project costs and geographic area; and only No. 9 was being
added. Mr. Best, an attorney for Onan Corporation, commented
that Onan is in the formative stages of this proposed project
and they are seeking cost reduction methods for the warehouse
� storage and production facilities. He further noted that the
land proposed avoids the contaminated areas which had been
previously platted into separate lots. Mr. Best concluded
JIti
$PECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 26 1489 PAGE 3
� that Onan Corporation is considering this project to increase
the internal efficiencies of the company.
Councilmember Jorgenson asked whether the jobs would be
relocated or new jobs. Mr. Best replied that initially they
would be relocated jobs from elsewhere; however, but later
there is potential for creation of new jobs.
Mayor Nee asked what is the potential contribution to the
other taxing districts. Mr. Casserly replied that the answer
to the Mayor's question is summarized in the last page of the
agenda materials, Exhibit X-E, which shows the worst possible
case. Essentially, the creation of this tax increment
district would prevent the reduction of the tax base over time
due to depreciation.
Councilmember Schneider, referring to Exhibit X-E 1, asked if
Mr. Casserly would explain the section entitled "Impact on Tax
Capacity Rate". Mr. Casserly replied that the tax capacity
rate increase equals a percent reduction of what used to be
called the "mill rate", all things being equal. This assumes
the development would have occurred anyway. Mr. Casserly
demonstrated that with more value, 1 mill raises more money,
but in fact what happens is the State makes up any differenae.
' The State legislature is well aware of this mechanism.
Councilmember Fitzpatrick asked if otrier taxing districts are
aware of this potential. Mr. Casserly said yes.
Mayor Nee asked about the benefit to the public and increasing
the tax base. Mr. Casserly responded that the City's goal is
to retire the tax increment financing districts as soon as
possible in order to share the increased increment with the
other taxing jurisdictions.
Bill Burns, City Manager, asked what were the indirect
benefits of this proposal. Mr. Casserly replied that there
is a multiplier effect. Every primary job creates certain
additional retail and service jobs. Mr. Casserly went on to
note that City of Fridley has a AA+ bond rating due to a very
favorable property tax mix of residential, commercial and
industrial properties. He noted again that building the tax
base through tax increment financing incentives is a desirable
method of prevention of property tax loss through depreciated
values.
Mayor Nee asked if there was any representative of the school
district present, or if we had received any comments. No one
responded.
� Mayor Nee then asked if there were any additional comments
from the Anoka County Board of Commissioners. Mr. Robertson
�
�
�
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETZNG, JIINE 26, 1989 PAGE 4
replied that he had made a presentation on the proposed
modification and district to the Anoka County Board of
Commissioners on Tuesday, June 13, 1989. He had subsequently
received a copy of the certified motion relatinq
to the presentation. That was the extent of any further
County comment.
Mayor Nee asked if there was any member of the public that
wished to comment on the proposed modification. There was no
response from the audience.
MOTION by Councilmember Fitzpatrick, seconded by Councilmember
Schneider, to close the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR NEE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT
8:05 p.m.
MOTION by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Jorgenson, to adopt Resolution No. 57-1989, adopting the
Modified Redevelopment Plan for the HRA's Redevelopment
Project No. 1.
2. SELECTION OF A CURBSIDE RECYCLING CONTRACT:
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that staff's
recommendation is very similar to one of the three scenarios
regarding solutions to the recycling service which were
summarized by the City Manager in a previous budget session.
Staff used 14 criteria to evaluate five potential recyclers.
Staff recommends a six month contract to carry on the
recycling service. Ms. Dacy recommended that the Super
Cycle/RECOMP contract be approved by the City Council even
though it is $10,000 more than the EZ Company. Ms. Dacy noted
that EZ Company lacks a proven track record and service data
and was unable to post a performance bond. Ms. Dacy noted
that both New Brighton and Arden Hills have contracted with
EZ Company. Staff's conclusion was that Super Cycle was the
best cost effective alternative for the next six months.
Mayor Nee asked if EZ Company has a contract with any other
cities.
Ms. Dacy replied that there are two sub-districts in the City
of St. Paul. She stated that EZ Company's performance could
be monitored over the next six months.
Mayor Nee asked if the City would have to pay extra for
service to multiple dwellings. Ms. Dacy answered no.
...y „
�
�
�
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JUNE 26, 1989 PAGE 5
Councilmember Schneider asked if Super Cycle would likely come
back after the six month contract with price quotations closer
to those of the higher ones proposed by BFI and Waste
Management Inc.
Ms. Dacy replied that Super Cycle uses a per tonnage rate
rather than a household rate as used by BFI and Waste
Management. She stated she cannot speculate as to what price
Super Cycle will give.
MOTION by Councilmember Fitzpatrick, seconded by Councilmember
Jorgenson, to adopt the staff recommendation to approve Super
Cycle�s contract for six months.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR NEE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Schneider stated he felt comfortable with this
proposal to buy time for the City and the County to assess
alternatives.
Councilmember Jorgenson commented that it
have continuity to prevent interruptions
service.
3. CLAIMS:
was important to
and lapses in
MOTION by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Jorgenson, to adopt the claims. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Councilmember
Jorgenson, to adjourn the meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MAYOR NEE DECLARED THE JUNE 26,
1989, SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AA70URNED AT 8:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
w� �
�-
Jock Robertson
Recordinq Secretary
� `i