The URL can be used to link to this page

02/12/1990 - 5339� .., • FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING ATTENDENCE SHEET MONDAY �e6:�t.�:atc y l 2 �:. , 19 9 D 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER � � jc� �ll� �� ,� � �o� G�� c�� 1 i �,� ►� t��;,sh� �� e� d� �P � 1 � � � a i��i2� 3�3 � l C� �; �. /U � � �.� � �so ,�%� c;-e � �'� : �� ` � v� L �� C., � �c �v �- N �-�s"� � i 1 WILLIAM'W. BURNS CITY MANAGER COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1990 f FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL FEBRIIARY 12, 1990 - 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION: National Child Passenger Safety Awareness Week February 11 - 17, 1990 APPROVAL OF MINIITEB: Council Meeting, January 22, 1990 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORUM. VISITORS: (Consideration of items not on agenda - 15 minutes) PUBLIC HEARING: Public Hearing on a Final Plat, P.S. #90-01, by Robert Larsen ` Partners, Znc., to Replat Lot 2, Block l, Northco Business Park �,� into Two Separate Parcels, �. Generally Located Directly East � of University Avenue, North of 71st Avenue, and South of 73rd Avenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - lY FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, FEBRIIARY 12, 1990 OLD BIISINESB: Second Reading of an Ordinance to Repeal Ordinance No. 930 � Pertaining to Vacation of a � Drainage and Utility Easement � (Gena-Rae Addition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2A � i Un,, , � � Second Reading of an Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 936 Regarding an Easement Vacation in Onaway Addition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 � ,� �'� � Second Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.07 of the City Charter to Vacate Streets and Alleys and to Amend Appendix C of the City Code (Gena-Rae Addition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7 � , �'_ �� Second Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.07 of the City Charter to Vacate Streets and Alleys and to Amend Appendix C of the City Code (Onaway ddition) / ,��"U �� , � � J ,- . . . . . . . 5 Paqe 2 0 _ _____ _ _ FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, FEBRIIARY 12, 1990 Paqe 3 NEW BUSINE88: �� Resolution Authorizing the Sale � of Tax Increment Refunding Bonds Not in Excess of $9,600,000 . . . . . . . . . . . 6 � ✓ / l� J First Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code by Amending Appendix F +`� to Provide for the Adjustment of Salaries for the Mayor and �11a Councilmembers in Accordance with Section 2.07 of the Charter of the City of Fridley . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7A � � �" �/1 � Authorize Contract for a �j Recycling Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 8 - 8A � � Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 31, 1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9I FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, F$BRIIARY 12, 1990 Paqe 4 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINIIED): Receive an Item from the Appeals Commission Meeting of January 23, 1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - l0U A-1. Consideration of a Variance, . VAR #90.01, to Increase the � Maximum Square Footage of a � Free-Standing Sign from 80 Square Feet to 177.25 Square � Feet, on Lot 1, Block 1, � Lot 1, Block 2, Great Northern Industrial Center East, the � i Same Being 5350 Industrial / U' Boulevard N.E. (Minikahda Mini Storage), by Leroy Signs ...................... 10 - l0U Receive Minutes of the CATV Advisory Commission Meeting of January 18, 1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11H Resolution Approving a Subdivision Lot Split, r� L.S. #89-01, to Split Off � �� the South 122 Feet of Lot 4, �,2'�, / � Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, ,,��' �" to Cre e arate rce , for a �`• - �'� -�`�� , . t �� . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12K '��i;k +�"' x�{, . •� `:� ?�'� � Resolution Establishing a Water �`"� Conservation Program for the Summer of 1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13A � M , � �U' FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, FEBRIIARY 12, 1990 Paqe 5 NEW BIISINESS (CONTINIIED): . _ .._ • \ I , r � lU' Establish Public Hearing n (/v �� an Ordinanc ending ions J J �� 7.04, 7.05, 7.0 , and 7.09 of the Fridley City Charter . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18D 0 Appointment: City Employee . f,�. . . . . . . . . 19 / � , n �/ ' � Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 � � � �� Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21B / � � Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 22E � �- � — �-�,�-� �Q-�-e-� ��,�e.-a � � � / � � �� ADJOIIRN: � � �' ,� Y � i t p 1 THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 1990 • THE MINi1TE8 OF THE REGDLAR MSBTING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF JANUARY 22. 1990 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:39 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billings MEMBERS ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 8, 1990: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: The Council requested that Resolution No. 6-1990 adopted on January 8, 1990 against approval of an application for exemption from a lawful gambling license by the Fridley Chamber of Commerce be re- considered under "Old Business" and that Item 2, Change Order No. 2 for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2, be considered after Item 12 on the agenda. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda with the above amendments. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Mr. Roger Blohm, a representative of the North Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped, presented the updated edition of the Access Guide to Friendly Fridley. He stated this booklet is to inform the elderly and persons with physical disabilities on the accessibility to businesses, schools, and parks in Fridley. Mr. Blohm stated a special project committee, with the assistance of two consultants, Cynthia Pudewell and Diane Mutchler, developed the survey form used for the booklet and volunteers conducted on- site surveys. He stated the volunteers were trained by Margot Imdieke of the Minnesota State Council on Disability and this booklet would not have been possible without the cooperation and assistance of many persons. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETZNG OF JANUARY 22, 1990 PAGE 2 Mr. Blohm stated he was a member of the Accessibility Project Committee along with Jesse Ellingworth, Tim Moriarty, Lonnie Ronning, and Jim Williams. Mr. Blohm stated he wished to recognize the support and assistance received from the City's Human Resources Commission; members of the City staff, Bill Hunt, Steve Barg and Mike Reiland; the volunteers; and Medtronic for the cover and binding of this booklet. He extended thanks to all who had contributed their time and efforts and stated, without this support, the booklet would not have been possible. Mr. Blohm stated Fridley is the only city to have such a boaklet and it would be distributed to such places as the library, school districts, Village Green, the hospital, medical clinics, the VFW and American Legion. The Council felt an excellent job was done preparing this booklet and thanked Mr. Blohm for presenting it to them. PUBLIC HEARING• 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989-1 �SANITARY SEWER LINE - 7570 HIGHWAY 65): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimausly and the public hearing opened at 7:47 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this improvement involves the installation of a sanitary sewer line at 7570 Highway 65. He stated a septic tank failed on this property in 1984 and, since that time, the owners have been patching and pumping the sanitary facility to keep it operating. Mr. Flora stated the estimated cost for this improvement is $18,227.50. He stated the property owner would be assessed at the rate of $12.15 per lineal foot for a total of $8,444.25, with the remaining cost borne by the sanitary sewer fund until such time as the property is redeveloped and the cost with interest assessed back to the property. Mr. Flora stated notices were sent to all persons known to be associated with this property and they were advised of the cost of this project. He stated the improvement is necessary to provide proper sanitary sewer facilities. . Councilman Schneider asked if all other commercial properties in the area were serviced by sanitary sewers. Mr. FZora artswered in the affirmative. No persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed improvement. FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL MBETING OF JANUARY 22. 1990 PAGB 3 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 7:50 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: 1.5. RECONSIDERATION OF RE50LUTION NO. 6-1990 FROM THE JANUARY 8. 1990 COUNCIL MEETING: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to reconsider the action taken on January 8, 1990 to adopt Resolution No. 6-1990 against approval of an application for exemption from a lawful gambling license by the Fridley Chamber of Commerce. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item indefinitely. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. ,j1989 - 1& 2) (SANITARY SEWER LINE - 7570 HIGHWAY 65):_ This item will be considered after Item 12 on the agenda. NEW BUSINESS• 3. APPOINT CITY REPRESENTATIVE TO THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION ON DISABILITY• Mr. Steve Barg, Planning Assistant, stated the National Organization on Disability is a private, non-profit organization dedicated to promoting full participation of persons with disabilities in all aspects of community life. He stated there is no cost to the City to become involved in this organization, however, cash awards are available for participating communities who demonstrate outstanding achievement. Mr. Barg requested the Council consider the appointment of Mr. Roger Blohm as the City's representative to the National Organization on Disability. He stated the City, for the past several years, has not been represented in this organization. Mr. Barg stated Mr. Blohm is an excellent individual to work with and has the awareness and drive to help the disabled. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize the City to join the National Organization on Disability and appoint Roger Blohm, 1605 Berne Road, as the City's representative for the two year tern►. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Blohm stated he wants to make Fridley well-known as an excellent place to live and work. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 22. 1990 pAQE 4 4. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL ORDINANCE NO. 930 PERTAINING TO VACATION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT jGENA-RAE ADDITION): Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this ordinance is necessary to repeal Ordinance No. 930 which contains an incomplete legal description of the easement to be vacated in the Gena-Rae Addition. She stated Item 6 on the agenda is to consider first reading of an ordinance containing the correct legal description. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. ,�IRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALZNG ORDINANCE NO. 936 REGARDING AN EASEMENT VACATION IN ONAWAY ADDITION: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this ordinance is necessary to repeal Ordinance No. 936 which contains an incomplete legal description of the easement to be vacated in the Onaway Addition. She stated Item 7 on the agenda is to consider first reading of an ordinance containing the correct legal description. MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE (GENA-RAE ADDITIONI: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, al1 voting ays, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE (ONAWAY ADDITION): MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF WELL NO. 5. PROJECT NO. 298: AND FRIDLEY CITY CODNCIL ME$TING OF Jl�NIIARY 22. 1990 PAQE 5 9. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF WELL NO. 10. PROJECT NO. 198: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated six bids were received for the repair of Wells No. 5 and No. 10. He stated the low bidder for Well No. 5 was Mark Traut Wells for $29,657 and the low bidder for Well No. 10 was Keys Well Drilling for $11,457. Mr. Flora stated it is recommended these low bids be accepted and the contracts awarded to Mark Traut Wells for Well No. 5 and Keys Well Drilling for Well No. 10. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the following bids for the repair and maintenance of Wells No. 5 and 10, Project No. 198: Bergerson-Caswell 5115 Industrial St. Maple Plain, MN Layne Minnesota 3147 California St. Minneapolis, MN 55418 E. H. Renner 15688 Jarvis Elk River, MN Mark Traut Wells 151 62nd Ave. St. Cloud, MN Keys well Drilling 413 N. Lexington St. Paul, MN 55104 Thein Well Co. P. O. Box 429 Clara City, MN Well No. 5 $35,553.60 $32,956.00 $33,939.00 $29,657.00 $34,300.00 $31,627.00 Well No. 10 $17,169.39 $12,276.90 $13,927.50 $14,311.00 $11,457.00 $15,830.00 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for the repair and maintenance of Well No. 5 to the low bidder, Mark Traut Wells in the amount of $29,657. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for the repair and maintenance of Well No. 10 to the low bidder, Keys Well Drilling in the amount of $11,457. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCZL 1�EETING OF Jl�NUARY 22. 1990 PAGE 6 10. AWARD BID FOR OPTICAL SCAN VOTING E4UIPMENT: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated staff appreciated the Council's support for the optical scan voting equipment. He stated it appears that, without the County's support, Coon Rapids and Blaine may not be in favor of proceeding with the purchase of this equipment. He stated it is hoped that the County would make a decision in the next several days whether they will or will not participate. Mr. Pribyl requested the Council consider a motion to purchase the optical scan voting equipment at the low bid of $5,270 contingent upon a commitment from the other cities and Anoka County. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize the purchase of the optical scan voting equipment, contingent upon the Joint Powers Agreement and participation by other cities and Anoka County. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Councilman Schneider stated he is an employee of Unisys who submitted the bid for the equipment and, therefore, would abstain from voting on the motion. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Billings and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Schneider abstained from voting on the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 7-1990 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1(SANITARY SEWER LINE): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 7-1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 8-1990 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING COMPLETION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1989 - 1(SANITARY SEWER LINE): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 8-1990. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. ,j1989 - 1& 2) (SANITARY SEWER LINE - 7570 FiIGHWAY 65): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. 2 for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 in the amount of $18,227.50 for installation of a sanitary sewer line to service 7570 Highway 65. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JANQARY 22. 1990 PAGB 7 13. RESOLUTION NO 9-1990 AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE SELF-INSURANCE FUND: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated the transfer of funds into the self-insurance fund would allow the City to self-insure such items as automobile collision, miscellaneous equipment and property, and signs, as well as Worker's Compensation claims under $500. He stated with the transfer of funds into the Self-Insurance Fund, the City would be able to provide insurance premiums from the interest earnings and dividend payments and relieve some fiscal pressure on the General Fund. Mr. Pribyl stated the transfer would not be irrevocable and if the Council found a higher priority for the funds, they could be transferred. Mr. Pribyl stated the City's insurance agent, Conway Olson, did an analysis of claims under $500 and it was proven that the Self- Insurance Fund would definitely result in savings for the City. Mr. Pribyl stated the large increase in the City's premium is due to two factors. He stated the rates increased by 15 percent and the City's experience modification went from .91 to 1.00, based on the number of claims and the dollar value of those claims. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 9-1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 10-1990 IN SUPPORT_ OF PAIRING ANOKA-RAMSEY COMMiJNITY COLLEGE WITH ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY IN A 2+ 2 HIGHER EDUCATION PILOT PROGRAM: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated the Anoka-Ramsey College Advisory Committee has requested the Council support the 2+ 2 pilot program to be considered by the State Legislature in 1990. He stated under this program, St. Cloud State University would offer course work at Anoka-Ramsey Community College leading to a four year degree. He stated Anoka-Ramsey would provide space for classes, library facilities, counseling, and space for other student support services. Mr. Burns stated staff recommends the Council adopt this resolution. He stated the Anoka-Ramsey College Advisory Committee has also requested the Council appoint a member of the Council as liaison to the group supporting this pilot program. MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 10-1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR REPLAT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1. NORTHCO BUSINESS PARK: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this parcel is located south of 73rd Avenue and east of the University Avenue frontage road. She stated it is about six acres in size and the petitioner is FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF JANUARY 22. 1990 PAQ$ 8 proposing to divide the parcel into two lots. She stated the petitioner, Larsen Partnership, has advised that the lender issuing the construction loan financing required that the first phase of the project have its own legal description. Ms. Dacy stated because a public hearing is necessary for a preliminary plat, it is requested the Council establish the date of February 12 for the public hearing in order that final action could be taken in February, rather than March. She stated the typical process would have been for the Council, at its February 12 meeting, to establish the public hearing for February 26. She stated the petitioner has advised, however, according to their loan agreement, construction would occur in March, 1990. MOTION by Councilman Billings to set the public hearing date for this preliminary plat for February 12, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR NORTHCO AND PRO-ENGINEERING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS: Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated the City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority need to notify the School District and the County by January 26, and publish notice by February 7, that they are going to consider expanding the HRA's Development Program. He stated this expansion would establish a short-term Economic Development Tax Increment District to assist Northco with an 18,400 square foot commercial/office building and to assist Pro-Engineering with a 24,000 square foot manufacturing plant next to Viking Chevrolet. Mr. Robertson stated a public hearing is necessary on establishing the tax increment district and recommended this hearing be set for February 26, 1990. He stated the establishment of this district would give the Council and HRA the options to assist these projects. He stated the Legislature is proposing to drastically change Economic Development Tax Increment Districts and, in the future, these sites may not qualify. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing for the establishment of the Economic Development Tax Increment District for February 26, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Billings requested that staff send out a notice, with a brief explanation of this process, to persons that would normally be affected if this were a rezoning. He stated he is requesting this mailing due to the fact that one of the sites has been the subject of some controversy in the past. Councilwoman Jorgenson requested this mailing be extended to those persons who submitted and signed a petition against the rezoning request for the service station. FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 22. 1990 PAGB 9 17. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE SIG�I PLAN FOR 8100 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.• MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the amendment to the comprehensive sign plan for 8100 University Avenue N.E. which would allow tenants in south-facing units to have the option of having 12 inch high gold lettering on a bronze plastic backing similar to the units facing University Avenue. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 18. CLAIMS• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No. 30219 through 30436. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19. LICENSES• MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted: AEC Engineers & Designers 511 Eleventh Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 1.5 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 193 (Inspector) Partial Estimate No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . $ 886.50 Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ,�DJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of January 22, 1990 adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Secretary to the City Council Approved: William J. Nee Mayor � � cinroF F�� DATE: TO: C011IlMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM February 8, 1990 r� � . William Burns, City Manager � FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Final Plat, P.S. #90-01, by Robert Larsen Partners Attached is the staff report for the plat, P.S. #90-01. The petitioner, Robert Larsen Partners, is replatting Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park, into two separate parcels as required by their lender. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council with five stipulations. Staff recommends that the City Council hold the public hearing which was set at their January 22, 1990, meeting, as required by the zoning ordinance. MM/dn M-90-81 lJ 1A � �► STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE �'�� pLI1PNVf` COM��SSION DATE : January 31, 1990 F[ZIDLEY C�TY OOl�1CIL DATE : February 12, 1990 AuTt�OFl ��_ REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST IOCATION SITE DATA StZE DENSITY PRESENT 20NING ADJACENT LAND USES � Z�i�:� UTL�E$ PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS F�IANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREI-ENSNE PLAN COMPATBILITY WRH ADJACENT USES � ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL CONS�ERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEI�ATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNKVG COMMISSION RECONNAENDATION P.S. �690-01 Robert Larsen Partners To replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park, into two separate parcels. 73rd Avenue and University Avenue 7.6 acres M-2, Heavy Industrial M-2, Heavy Industrial to east, south, and west; R-1, Single Family to north Available to site Split required by lender for phased construction of office/warehouse complex Yes Yes Approval with stipulations Approval with stipulations Staff Report P.S. #90-01, Robert Larsen Partners Page 2 Request : The petitioner is requesting to replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park, into two lots of approximately 3.7 and 3.9 acres each. Ordinarily this can be achieved by a lot split, but because the property is torrens property, Anoka County would not record the lot split descriptions. Therefore, a replat is required. Site The parcel is located at 73rd Avenue and University Avenue, with frontage along both the service road and 73rd Avenue. The site is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, with the same on the east, south and west. R-1, Single Family Residential zoning is across 73rd Avenue to the north. Analysis Platting of the Northco Business Park was completed in March of 1989. The petitioners are proposing to construct the first phase of a one-story office/warehouse building. The lender for the construction financing would not authorize a loan for the entire parcel, but only the area necessary for the first phase. This dictated that a separate legal description had to be created. Issues concerning architectural standards, landscaping requirements, and storm water management were addressed in the development agreement approved with the original plat. The proposed structure is to be a one-story structure of brick finish, with bronze glazing accents. The proposal requires that many of the existing trees on the site be incorporated into the landscape plan, with the addition of additional trees appropriate to the area. A bikeway/walkway is proposed for along the west property line. Additional parking lot screening is needed along the south and southwest portions of the site, but the remainder of the parking area should be adequately screened. The joint driveway will occur along the north property line between the two lots, and will allow access for both phases of the project (see attached map). Provisions are being made to manage the storm water runoff. Easements are proposed along the east property line (see attached map) and the City Engineer has requested the storm water calculations to ensure adequate reten�ion area. Staff recommends that joint driveway easements and the proposed ponding easements be filed. Staff can find no negative impacts to the proposed subdivision. Staff Report P.S. #90-01, Robert Larsen Partners Page 3 1C The second phase will be a"mirror" image of phase one. The delivery access to the rear of the buildings will continue to 73rd Avenue. This access was approved as part of the original plat process and may also be shared with the parcel to the east. Therefore, ultimately, there will be a circular traffic pattern around the building. Even if the site was sold to a different owner, that project would have to utilize the joint driveway and address the ponding arrangement at the rear of the building. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the replat request, P.S. #90-01, with the following stipulations: 1. 2. � Storm water calculations shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both parcels prior to issuance of a building permit. A ponding easement(s) shall be dedicated on the plat or by separate document prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council with one additional stipulation: 5. That the issue of the joint driveway over the lot line be resolved prior to the City Council public hearing. STAFF UPDATE Section 205.18.03.D.2.a requires the building setback to be 30 feet from the side lot line if a driveway is proposed between the building and the lot line. The Planning Commission wanted a determination on whether or not the building had to be 30 feet from the lot line where the joint driveway is located, instead of 20 feet as it is proposed. We conferred with the Building Inspector and the City Attorney. We determined that the building could be 20 feet from the lot line as is proposed. The intent of the above cited section is for �I�� Staff Report P.S. #90-01, Robert Larsen Partners Paqe 4 driveways entirely on one property. This driveway is located on both properties. Further, a joint driveway is permitted by Section 205.18.5. Therefore, we believe the proposal is not contrary to the intent of the ordinance. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff reconumends that the City Council approve the request, P.S. #90-01, with the stipulations as recommended by staff. PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL 1E Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Monday, February 12, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of a Final Plat, P.S. #90-01, by Robert Larsen Partners, Inc., to replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park into two separate parcels, generally located directly east of University Avenue, north of 71st Avenue, and south of 73rd Avenue. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: January 31, 1990 February 7, 1990 Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. CITY OF FRIDLEY pI.PiNNZNG COlII�IIBBION 1[$$TIDiG, Jl�NOARY 31� 1990 CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Betzold called the January 31, 1990, Plann Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. � �OLL CALL• Members Present: Don Betzold, Dave Kondric , Alex Barna, Paul Dahlberg Members Absent: Sue Sherek, Dean S a Others Present: Barbara Dacy, anning Coordinator Michele McP rson, Planning Assistant Dale Eds om, Northco Corp. Kelly ran, Robert Larsen Partners, Inc. 0 1F MOTION by � Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to approve the Decembe�/, 1989, Planning Coaunission minutes as written. '� VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER80N BETZOLD.DECLARED MOTION CARRIED IINANZMOQSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT. P.S. �90-01 BY ROBERT LARSEN PARTNERS. INC.: To replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park, into two separate parcels, generally located directly east of University Avenue, north of 71st Avenue, and south of 73rd Avenue. Ms. McPherson stated that the petitioner is requesting to replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park into two separate parcels. Northco Business Park (which is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial) was recently platted. The purpose of replatting Lot 2 into two separate parcels is partially due to the fact that this is a two- phase project and in order to receive financing for this project, the lender has requested that there be a separate legal description for each phase of the project. Ms. McPherson stated that when Northco Business Park was platted as part of the development agreement, there were concerns regarding the issues of architectural standards, landscaping �� , � h• ��< . ,�: � � 1G requirements, and stormwater management requirements. This particular proposal takes into account those items outlined in the development agreement. Ms. McPherson stated that across both parcels, a pondinq easement is proposed which should be adequate area to ensure reter►tion space for the required stormwater management. The City Engineer has also requested that the stormwater calculations be submitted so that he can check to make sure this is, in fact, an adequate retention area. Ms. McPherson stated the architectural standards have been taken into account. It is a one-story buildinq composed of a brick and metal facade. In addition, the petitioner has submitted a preliminary landscape plan which includes many of the existing trees on the site. There are some weak spots along the southwest portion of the site as far as screening of perimeter parking, and that is one of the stipulations recommended by staff. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the replat request with the following stipulations: 1. Stormwater calculations shall be submitted prior to insurance of a building permit. 2. Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both parcels prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. A ponding easement(s) shall be dedicated on the plat or by separate document prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building penait . Ms. McPherson stated Phase II is not shown on the site plan; however, the circulation pattern will be such that the rear driveways will continue northward and will exit out onto the service drive that wi1Z create a circular driving pattern. There is a driveway which will exit out onto Northco Drive as well. Mr. Barna asked if a variance will be required for the zero lot line driveway. There was no problem when it was one property, but now there are going to be two properties. Ms. Dacy stated that again they are going back to the interpretation of the ordinance (similar to SBF Corporation) that if it is a joint driveway and if the lot line goes through the 1H PI.�NNINa COI4II88ION l[SBTI�a. JlIN. 31. 1990 PAGE 3 driveway and not the parking spaces, it was determined that a variance is not needed. Mr. Dahlberq asked if that was only if the buildinqs meet the setback requirements. Ms. Dacy stated that, yes, the building has to meet the setback requirements. Mr. Barna asked if the proposed building is qoing to meet the setback requirements aqainst this lot line. Ms. McPherson stated this can be checked prior to the City Council meeting. Mr. Kelly Doran stated that the sideyard setback is 20 feet, and the distance from the building to the lot line is 20 ft. The - same is true for the building to the north as well. The driveway to the south will be approximately 30 ft. in depth from curb to curb and then a 5 ft. landscaped area adjacent to both buildings for a total of 40 ft. between the two properties. Ms. Dacy stated the sideyard setback is 20 ft.; however, where a driveway is to be provided in the sideyard, the minimum required sideyard increases to 30 ft. so the petitioner might have to shift the lot line. Mr. Doran stated that in phase 2 the other option is to come back and simply join the two properties together again. That would eliminate the need for increased setback. The primary reason for splitting the two lots is for financing purposes. Mr. Betzold stated there is always the possibility that a different person buy one of the lots and develop it. Mr. Doran stated that is a remote possibility. Mr. Kondrick stated the petitioner should be aware that if that ever happens, it would necessitate a variance. Mr. Doran stated he thought the issue can be resolved with staff. He appreciated the Commission's concern. Mr. Doran stated the stipulations as proposed are acceptable to them. 1�OTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. OPON A VOIC$ VOT$, l�LL VOTING �iYE, CHAIRPSR80N BETZOLD DECLARED THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOBED !rT 7:�0 P.M. 1 I �I.l�Ir'�dIld« COl�II88ION 1[EETII�a. Jl1N. 31. 1990 P71GE � Mr. Oahlberq stated that reqardinq the discussion about the appropriate location for the property line, he would recommend another stipulation that states: l�ny change or modification to the property line as proposed shall be resolved with staff prior to review by the City Council. �QTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City Council approval of Preliminary Plat, P.S. �90-01, by Robert Larsen Partners, Inc., to replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park, into two separate parcels, generally located directly east of University Avenue, north of 71st Avenue, and south of 73rd Avenue, with the following stipulations: 1. 2. Stormwater calculations shall be submitted prior to insurance of a buildinq permit. Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both parcels prior to issuance of a buildinq permit. 3. A ponding easement(s) shall be dedicated on the plat or by separate document prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Any change or modification proposed shall be resolved by the City Council. to the property line as with staff prior to review IIPON ]i1 VOICE VOTE, !►LL VOTING lrYF, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION Cl�RRZED ONANIMOIISLY. Ms. Dacy stated that because of the petitioners' particular demands to start construction and their commitments to their tenants, they requested that the City Council establish a public hearing in advance of the Planning Commission meetinq, so that public hearing will be on February 12, 1990. 2. 1990 WORKPLAN AND EVALUATION OF 1989 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Ms. Dacy stated that at the December 6, 1989, P1 ' Commission meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed 14 Ways to Build a Better Commission". One of the it e Commission wanted to look at was what they have oing in the past year, determine how they did it, and some new goals for the upcominq year. Ms. D ated she had come up with a draft evaluation for the ission's review. As far as 1989 was concerned, she made a �� ,E�a CEC � � � � 1 � �— �� 7 � r,s=lvr— (eo�ol 6 1 � �NIMERCE CIRCLE .,. f .. i i � "� � ��. --._L—e _.=[ TRACT �� A P . S . 4� 90-01 Robert Larsen Part. � � S �/2 SEC. //, T 3C C/T Y OF FR/OL EY I 31 10 I � , . , � , � 3�vr�R� . . • • I Ft` u � Hti'R•�!'N p��9 '" T_'" _ ieN K . i! � W � �..�.__.�..wwi��`� `:.-u�•n.��•..� � .ar+Mn._�w•... i w.2' . _ �+s �I Toert A � s TRACT r�J P�O e C T - V � 1� �o- , �: �' �o , �. �RACT D " � ;y: �. ,,, .. • - • -- f " I 33 COLUMBtA ARENA � . , � 34 I I � : i TRACT 8.� � i �� _ �P - ro . cQ�F'� a0 - �� -. • Tw - — awc � � LG � � I �� I 1�. i •/ � �� LOCATION MAP 3 � w �,� � `�.:� � `...� �.S � �R�T� � '� �,,� {� - ..��' � �CC 0 M,M,U � � � � � '� �' �� '� �-� `� •� R�� .. .? r�`")? .. v 0 z r a 3 x � _ Y Z � � H W N Q � � P.S. 4�90-01 Robert Larsen Part • ♦ � 1 � . . - 715T Av[nvC �c ,f ..._ �; � ^� �..,� J� �:,� � � � �� "r -�- �� Y �G� � eN�: ,�' � c rT�i � . � �� . ,,� �¢ � -� " � � � � �;;, � �3 � r.., � -- , �• � '`� �� ", ET t`" ��G� `� r� � �..'� � � '; • . � �� . � � r� � ' � `�`�� ,;^� � ,� 1 � E �,�r: � a�J► � � ..�;�°�,,�� ,�,�__ ..3 �� ;, �-�-.,.� . - P � ��!� r � � :� � �� ,�� ;�-� t� �� ...��•�• .; �, � �-, ^' ``.� ...' �� _� �_� -�'� �.. �� - _ ? �, �.� _:� . ZONING MAP Joint driveway. � / � �f . / ',. �� / ,��° �', / .�; , �� >) � �� ( � � M • Y • � • • P.S. #90-01 Robert Larsen Part. �OT SPLIT OF: � UNIVERSITY AVENUE BUSINESS CENTER vae: THE ROBERT LARSEN PARTNERS ---- - - _ � -�� - . . ..... . --r % SITE PLAN P . S . �190-01 Robert Larsen Part. �� ; . .. . . i�'.' + . _ -• , ,�� t' - ' - »ti w�R ;'� . . . : _- . , _ • � _____.._�_°—..��....—_�....� `i- .._ ' ,I • . � . � �i � . . ' • ; i_____�__ __�_ ��_�' • . � � �_! 7 s•,'r�.,+ . — 1 � � � ' ii1EE PLANiiNCi OETAI� ,�. �l-:: � .�. . ! � � v�'1 t_ -.N � . ... 1 � � �v:�, 1 . � �l 1 • "��''- 'j� l '- . � ��..�r.. � � 1 - 1 y:.i��+ : j � � , . ". . � ~ ��.+'.+ � : / I ,',� .. . .. . ,.,r,.r..r.... , / � . !� � '••,'. � � . ^ .r�.r� / C.{ . . � ' � / i.V� R� 'f��' . 1� � � " . . � �`. ::... � r ., , � � � . . ..........��a...�. i ; I � �� i . � .. 1 . .. , ;.'` � .. , . b..wa.� +. e i � i 1' � . ., "' �� `�"w�..'°�.� / / � : 1 � e..w.r . ` / � , � '�• �. _ . . ' ..c.ycwr.�.ros � ��,` �' �� . �> . ��.:a / w �� • � . . / ' • . � ` . . r.x..n�r� / :�' . � _ ' . . � � ` / ; r ��/. � �J" 8lf�lJB PLANTING DETAIL ,{� � � 3r / , .;�� ►; �-�:,...=_.. , �, ; , �.�..o .. / � ' . • �.� � �. � ., ,. ' _..�: " — ,d. ,_ . . ' - I --� _....�. � .� Proposed ponding area, �- r� V�M: � easement(s) required. , � � �........ i. : - � i �� :1;� �• , iI ' �;~fr�.. , ` _ , '. .. - . , . ------- �---- -- - i: ' ��. . ' �n�co o�vt � -- ,.: ;. ...- , .. i ; ` , . ' . ! _ 1�� , �- , , E i� r � ��t. �� i� :i 5� � � I - � �.1.� W Z W ~ V � I � � W Z Z � W lo� � J ¢ 1.1.. i NZ�� O; � J Q � � F— W � O I W /y i � Li _ � WT i � ::� � 2��5�� 3�t�s =:t Fs=,.) �Jf�� s zj? s t xt � 1"t�{: i � : �?�- F ''ss ��•�� t��:�a P.S. 4�90-01 l�S�';; ��=�•�3 � � � ':ilt�a ._� r �s .s ' 3��:'ip! 1:9e'i�! �� i=i'�iz� � s:rsjs i�ii ��t`�yia ' ��t• i:�s - ei a��s � :3 :t� ,�5t�e�f� .=I��;�� s � 1}i �t{�! i �-=_�tis� �'�_�=�33 �t �,..l�' =1�-, t � s �it�5 �t;� �4�5.��;: e�i i��ii::l� :L�: 3 ! � • � �=Esilcs, i i:— ��• F [ �� ° `"�i ��i� - f� i:��=::tE_��_a -tF : �_�� 5•1 st :te::'sas':• ��ti � II�tlifd��ai��: +t=.: : t � :`.;!i5�." .';ti5�.. .. i�; - �� •�eE�tee�o 1�F�'e•:i 1��€'i.:i ! 5��3�l� ! ��s3i z i�2i��i�1 i��if�i�c �:i�{ii:{ �:�iiiF?� � i. i: , \ \\� �� .� � R i: Z � 9 • 1N :� , � � �' t � �i� � �� : � � .I � L_ J� LSCLiiE � ta9 CO'fSL N� '��w eu. r� aa�� tu�o ��iy� � . M�S W°S �M � Y� �►s 1eM �6 � � ti � �o x�� l��i� ��io � O ' •�u� `s��a{�y�.� �ays .,, � ._., wa�ov'o� r�u �f1i+E�RQ7 Alis��aiwen� 0 . � '� V�/ W , Q� t..Lt O � � � � z W > �� " � � � � W � — � � � �W �F-� z W� U U� � W Z — � � II x W � z W 1 � W z 0 � UU Q � a P.S. ��90-01 � Q�� Robert Larsen Part. r � � �.� � .e� g � �� &� �� Q <�� 0 �SY�� bg � `�`' �� 'g� �� ,�� `�� .�.� •N� �� .$ � � ��tl{LtL � . � �.�' ��.$�� 3y��-8$�� p � a��`g-g Q��610� ��ILLLLLWW�3�N�¢��RLL�Ch-�HQI-��¢� -LLLLLLS2� � O � F- L7GfYU� �dQ"<G< aQ- <QQQQ < < < < < �NNN�NYf Q a O �1] U � � 0 g � W J � � � � � � ., � L .�j �� , .� �N � � � � � 0 a�� Q ��s�� 9 ;' g� o o �' •- f V ��Qw,� � 0 � �_ � �a�d� a�� Ono> ,, cJJa �N � � Y ��pQ ��N�o�� D��N�� Q 0�i � Q N d a �,r N .� a�� ,� � � .�,� � g .E -� Q 3aN u ��o Jll�i�v�� Q a � o � a � �� '� ��_ � N �(�{��rag.�Q�� l�� fh Q� O Q°�°-'�a� a�� t , i � ; � 1 P.S. �690-01 �n�iR 09 CO1S5 N+ '��M � ar �`� Wocau+l�1 '�+IP!y �.�/ � 1 P wa5 w5 vnr m Y� � Ves +�9 �lOPI 1i�OC�Pl�1� 0 Y �• w a � � �• � •o Y■1WD'J ��PMtfl� •�u� 's}�a��4�h1 �a4S � '=;::' �� _,�.� wac,� �� . . � r,�, AV7 Al1ii0�AWiM � i r a� a � z� a � ¢ i�! � is �,�� ,#�il �iY� �ij� �l �f tj Z � �� ti�S'. �� ,� �� t;� ��s i � E� �1��., � � �,t��i �� f�i ��lC.�,� #� ��{ 1 � ��!�f'�� ,. �...... � j i " � i�t y ! �� , �;r b , �I �� CSZZ�6C� IZ�9' C'n5: N: 's�r000w� v7'/lff� !I `" e� . WosauN� ''�IP!�j r.r> v5 un. m r,a .n •nos +e � �. w. „ 7 I�AVI1i Y�Oi� saa��. � uas�o i �+ax� a 1 }�4.JF ��u s �a � » oa - � ��e� �e��n� / b I� I #.y d 4S a..., � .... e��r�,e- a.ia�m��a��s 1Q tu2�bC[ IZt4� [0�55 ra+ 'cnoow.� -- —��T Y9 oti "� p , �osa+.+W '/�w.d F wn �q un. m l� v+ tiae5 +►6 �';�E � s�cui�D� u2s�ol :�a�_c' all C� .«w..c � P1bi� ��'r IA�SR9Fs5 �"aE'i:£:BPS� L '�u� 's��a#�y�.� oays ��a€stie �bc�r�€F�-s:� 1 R w F3 � \ , e• oY --�o. ,� o ` P.S. .0—O] � � �,j� j e. s '� .� Robert rsen Part . �' �.. � � t f� 16D � 1 �i� t � �r � � � � � � 2,� �[' I °� � i .�. E,� , � _. � � � �. � --� ,.o ,� >( � �,�� .�.._. _ :�°J '%' `� I � \ ��,..._ , // . �, - ' ''`�;`��... l: � , ` y _, � � � Y • �-� ��;� s •<�� : �� : � .�` �' �1 �� ., � , . �'. iF � � . �� _ - � • r� . �•' t� , � m ' • i• . . . . � • . ,• �. , � Q . � � � � ' �7 �'�j, [� � g • � � ,' •'� � � ,. � ` � r . �� ,• a � ,,.ti rS`, � �; �;� \ ; - < ` ��. � . . , � , . � `� : � � • • • � � �� ',�i � �. .� •+ � � j a � , ` � `,,`� ` , /` � �' ' r j . � , � ! ♦ �� .♦ , � � � I e `II / .. ',\ sII �� *'� �' :�{ � . I i �i I � . 9 g ;• � r,.= b�. . � . � . � �� _,-. � � . ., . ; � . � ,•' � y p � t /!� ,• ��.' . G � %l. � I �:1 "' �• / ,', � . / � ! � p r > �, � . o I � ' r � �Y� . � ��, ..I-- • V ~.�. � . � g� �"'�i', •1 �� ♦' 1 ef i �. . k' i __ � � I �� /- ^ � •�4 t8� �.� � .. \� ♦�, °� � � � .J� 1 B � � . _�r�±- � 6 �� _ � �� ti.• � t � _ � � � � � �� 1 n '' • .\ ' �s f � � •; '- ! �� ,a �� .� � E f 1 � ; ..- •,. � � 1. � � Z; :=l , ,�' . .. �� t e� ' sii .. s � '� I � •,- � � . i; i �:,e trf- i � � • - � •. . , �. . i ...; � � �\ �� /�'a \. � +• �l �kY� � � ` )' i• ' � ! ♦ �'erF � \ ^�,� ± � � �� S��` , � � �'� 6� � . -- � .,� Y s� , � ( � �^ \\ •`* 1 � P�; �•' � � � � 3 %�� ` � ', (" .�V s � /� i �., '�X� `� `o . roc.. �� • � C � \ , ' � ��i� f` � . : .1 \ , ` — — — — p K� •.l$.'.. �%� � � . � �i — — e` - � —� \ p � ` �/.� . y� —` l J � � \ � / �L I . � �r \ �� `:�, � O __—�- FFtr j � i �, , =_` .. � / '� '� , f�js 4;�= ; i � ( a d. �; � ia,Fi s��3 I 5 ,� �� y� �`• ��' �`�,�: = . :� � �� T' �� . I i: , � �-�r; f \1. . ,�r � t �\ .� .\ �,%� � ' � �I I `�=/ ' ` _ �' ' ' . — ' � �;� ��- — < � o'.,,.. � � -; 'ti—. � — �. ✓ � `��'�_ �\' /�� I�� : —;' �� I � � . , .. ` � 1,� 7>�„/ m _ _- -. — � --- � _ � ,r �' V ^ '�J \ 1�, i �� _ __ __ __ _ • � �,�A�:..:..' y.�• �.�MII� � +,i"w�;.ir l�i�eiv�-4M'nk''�a:�a . � � ' 'k �� ,� Q � � � Y�� • � � � � . � �N � ,�� . �r� � _ ■ � � i� ! �� t t !�� E� � , ��E=� �� ! . :� = �.� �1.� �, t� (� E� � � :� .� �, . � ! � =�� E ��;;�� .� �� a� (f i� � � �� i ��l� � �� ; � �� ._ �� .�� . ' 1 li t i li�� !� ��1�� ' , .. . .. :I• � • ••�, } • ,'� �, �_ �. � ; � �, � . � �I � i �I I I I � i I i �i • P.S. �i90-01 Robert Larsen Par[. � � - _ ��_� ��$� � �: :!� $ Y _. = I (t�• - ,�. � . ' �. {� ., t 1i y . . � �' . . . .� . • i" �'y'•'t.•�, : �. >_ •.y '.. . :.:..:i � �,- ' �••��'- • , � _ � � ' " J .�. �. . \ � . �. . . . _ � �\ [ T � • ' • ��/I � � '_l�w.'_ � �� . � � \\ i \ _ \ 17 ' ^ . � � .^ , . . . . . ) •t . •"��_� .. . . . ^ , '� . .. � 1 I.'� �. J � • . . r ! � �� . . _ .� .�_ � � _ �.....�.- �. `�.�• rT• ,�� L�� vT' �.�'ly� 1• j . .. -_ . . �� :� • : . . �`: �� .+! � __� ! � � i �� --- _._--� � - � ��i � ---��°- - 1 i �. � _ :� l _ . . . . . -_: r sT �: y�L�<�=;••:,. :. . _ . _ . j � .. ... . � y_� � { - � � ,... . � _' '.'i '. !�+'r"-r. . . - . � .ic_ ��.� . . . �a��.:tr�°��F�}].�"� �!'. 'ti.a� . . _ • . .._ . �,�,, �.�,�,� � L.� ' � _ � .� � ' - . . . . . , ?z �. .. . .�:i;�.` �, .1,t�� _ . • �� . - . �rsi:- .: � : . . • .4��'`-�','�►:��+4� -�� 'Mi► r'/i a�?� • � - _ t��e�— = , .iJibr�.. ' _ ' _ _ _ r ..�� • '_ _ _' � P.S. ��90-01 cszr�ecc a�s� co,s; �w •.�...w --za--e-+��•s o,.� �..�., �wai u^5 uw m�m wn 'wo5 •+e s W°5�41 �IP�j ■■ �,��" r w r.e �4�od uxml IaWtl °4- �r Y F '�U S� I� ve wvc� �aoa� meacc�� sr�e�sn� I ' a �.y h1 �4S �sa��s�ar �i��a�.�s � P.S. ��90-01 � en Part. «: uE „� �� ,�.,.,, _ . � — .d _ � � �Ma� . 1 V rr, •��5 va m YOa �s tia� are � Id�ii 1�7�1i ��Od ��l 1�v�1 �41 ��.,J �w■.4 •x,� �S}�z��y�� s :°,a-::.=.'a: �srow �a� ��e�no �r ...� �+ �..�.. pA� A11��0i'iFIP!"9 ,,,,s �� r\ � / � \ - . . - � -.�: , . . . ---.�- �-- —T-- -�-��- - ! �i�n*ii wM� ��T , �ru+w �i� i� w �» ' � V .r.� .�.�.�.M _.._. ..s N��IAII �� " �,..,,�,,,., �` ; � � P . S . 4k90-0 1 . E j, t� _ • Robert Lar��n Part . � , �� . ; _ � �. . ; �i�� , : ' �� p � � �l " ��<< � ; �� .. . 1 ��E� � � .. . j : . -�.�� i � . � _ � ; _ _ .. . �lo��l�� E . _ . ,. ; , . �,.., :: , . ( _ _ . _._. . . _. _ . � 1s f .. . �... � S�1r �1. �' .�._ . . . . .. . • . '� � "__ . � ` tia+�'�.. �.,r �,rw - � . ! . .! s `: . . t%�• . . , i i_ : ' . ; ' ' t `\ \` . . . . _- ` . . _ . . ' 1 � � � � . . � `�ti��'♦ ,� - --- ------ ------- - ' �. _ t . �+•�'�'°ac�""°M "- • , . t' i ' -_�_=- =__: -___-___=_; . . , t. .. ,. . - . � . � � . .. � . : i : -r,.. - . _: r � �� , . . ...,,. , , . _ : ,,i�z. . .�� - _ r � _� � , � _...__ , ' �. .__, . __ '. ,� }. _' � : �` � .r_. � � � ; � ' ,T._...;,�_.r.,_,�_. .�. _ .! ..L' �.r..-�...� :....�. �_ -A..�. � _. �.,.^ �.�-."------� '�"-+�► - �r' �w*^ . . . . - ..- : . � � ' . .�•� ` s�. 1 ' • . .-' � . . . ' ' . ' �� . y I . � \ , ' � � 1 � . 1 � 1 � � `�� ! ■• 1 � � = I � t� • i� I � I � • � • � � ! . iI i \ ` � i I ' � ` � �\. � ` r . � I � � � �`� , � 1�� , , R �' � � � , , ..� e ; 1 I 'e `. . � t � � �' �t i � � ` � ; e � � � � ------ __ � ��- � , I _ _ '"_— - - - -�-- ; i 2�� j�1 ` ' `�lyp `�.. ` i-�— , i . ' � ; �\ � r { � j i i { � � . , • —� i �! i I ' i R � � +► ` � ^�D' � � ' � l � i ' . � � � `. � �r. " ' { I � ' � ♦`` , � � _� j1`' '� � � � �\ �� _ ,_� i ; ; . . � � — si � . ! i . �� L �'. • � rt-� � • �1Ni � � \ \ A� � yb . I I � � � ' �i , \\` ` —iy ♦ � j I I \ � � � , \`_�.�. !` � __�\ �- - � __ _ __� _�. �i � _�� --►----'�--- �?i:i _'—'----- � �. ( ,f ��; �� J •, ��d � � I �� :� . . . - � �� #� �� . p , : � � �� . � � �: - . ; � ��i�� -�--�:-� _ ;. � � - . .. : �. . ,_ __. � � .o., . :� _.. . � ��I.. � . . " y •f��,. _ . . . �� ` {p�yi� i ,�y� 'i- ♦ '� 'M„ `:-+4-s .1 a � r '•L'.tjr i - . �.r� \ �i�..t � T �yf�k� �w+'^�' � t . J . � • :1 k� ' `i�� }; ;,�.� �� +' ,�(�1'!t'4 S.a� • ,' �! ..-.4` `t -. 'a ; f� , - ;_. . . } ".2� k �!}�Jrc. r�t�ir K i: .. � `� 'n^ �+ ��.w'� - ' .: ,x-s� . �1 .J � � � . �. 4� � "� 'i ;N 3�i � s.�.�G!�� . ..-r.«t.i�' ��• t : I`-�w.• I��' '_ " �.� � '_ r.�'�r'TR`�� r . � �f � � � ' • � �r �N �� j � � •. � i! �i �It � � ' ` . � �� , � � / � 1' , i� ; � ., ;! t. .u,i ,i , ' W 1 � �� i � � � k� � . � � �; •s:�fs es ts�i L - �m tie�iii�fii; ei •1��, • <<i�} I; ;� ::�;;�iiii� ii: � �.ii�i;� �� " ` � � �li�i� �I� �. •••sss. . ' � . • - ::--,� �"�'�„��_��'`"R'� �. �� ' �"� � �r �,,. ,.� ..l.. ..,. �.-. .., , : . ., . . ..' , , �--',�,r ,�p�"�� . '--- �' ,� h X �y - �urw �n �.Y . _ .....�.� .� �... � �7 - . �r �i�� .��r�i� � . M�r P . S . 4190-01 Robert Larsen Part. ' ��= '; � �q , � �i � i'� j� ', �; ;�� - .�� { 'Iii! �i 1 .� 1� �� •� �1� j,�� .; . '� ��` �� t ��j) �i i�:y � ! ili le��l, � . il � . � it 1�• �1t titi lii 1� �ii �i 4el! �.3 . � ' . � .^�»� , _ . �; _ . ;.' . . . , . I ; � ` ' . _. � ' . �_ .� -� � _,_' -4i. �.�= '� ��ryTA� ' � .. • °: `� .. + �.M � ,,, � � � ti. , - .V.- ♦ � �'j�',y x'��ii -�'� �� .. = � «� - '.. �• � � 1�Mr . 1.,�. •:r.. , r.•�._�. -�= '�'�' � � ..� . ; �� ..^_ � _, ,� :�� „�x.,}�,� P �y .�; 1 � . �: '� � - ; � .(, '" . _ . .. Q. ' � - ',� ... /K `F��• • � �^i��(�L \s:. � _• .J. • 1 l ` � � , Y • _a � I . i` , . � �� /� . ( � . `� .. . . . . .. . lr�•�►�"��C�i'1'� A^1 \ • ' .. � � . ..- ��t��J'�� •�� . , . '{i��-�.Y ��":_�`. � l , a! .t . �I• r �~;J ��r�..j.-�..�:—��``,.. •i� i � .'�,� .z 'i•�C^".vE�..?'<f�' '-�! rr. '•. ... � , . e t ' ►'.+� �� ' ^' � 1 '� i �.. .: ' �'; . � : �. .♦ ; . 1 ��Y . ' - '•'� t�!dC'S. � . . 4 . �. ' � fi . ' �. . � .. y `� � " . , ,• , '� - �� _, ' 4 �� i � hf � .s r!. `.�r � �L.�t/ k - � � �J� . •�� .{' '�' .�,'� i ►'.t?1;krr� ♦+w . r r . � ,. �`� . � �j #i�.��v �' �' _ ��. _��. �,, -+we�r-+�-�.'�^.r±--.'..^",nr.�'�!'�,'.�`_ ,+ , ""'•�.l'�►'�'..... , :., _y . /%� � �. - '�ti"�; i_ �7%r'"•t:,� .y .v _. , ...1 � .♦ _ . . .� � � ,. • • .. � �L.�` ' � ' ��` � ��/ I 1 1 ` ``` , . � ' 1 `` ` ` 1 � � \�` � ♦� �. i 1 � � .v� . . � � � , � � �I � � �. • 1 � _ `�``` _ t i `�C` ` � ( , 1 --` `` . � �-- � ``` I 1 �; - ��-� �•_, `�� O .� �uJ ♦ �` `, � ` � .l. ;.0�0 \ �1 ` `\ .� . , � f � � I ' � � ! ! ! ; . �� [ . . i � �i . � � � ;� J � '''�' � a �' , '� � ; �i t' � - �� . ��i�j��i'j��j��=� ;' �� EfE,! E, �� ,.,� � '� f• � 1�� I � � ! � " �I � '� .. i i�. �<<� �.}�u u . � � 1� � . .. � �l. i . '� � ' � � i�i j�� { � � l��w �{:�.��,�� !�Z 1 �.i . �-';.'i.�` .•i.r•• ` ;C- , x .%�^„�� - - - - -- .sr M . . r • r � .a . . . . . S •F j � N-.. - �f f _. ..,�; .+a.•f "�-4^ , . �rti�- ±�±�---�- � - ` R_� i _ _ • �' _ ~� A t'� � � � j � �; - !, ;y . . �� ' i _' ,: ;, ; i�= � k' _ �� z: � � ..�-. -� �-•;::. 1 iu, =t:. � . � � . . 'b�� . �• ....._ - , ,. � -. �-.:r�, -. . . . � �' � � ., ., - � .,�., Y ,� .• i . �� ';!^�(t'{�y_. , �+�' .�' ;� s � ..t.��:..� . . e�� P.S. ��90-01 Robert Larsen Part• I� v T .s'Z Kc r._�,m M•5: Ha •s,oenw,_n. --v—��_ �.. . �: p�osva�yy •�atp,j WK Y'S ��Y �A 7IQ .», ,sec ,ne �—"-j�-� ' �o �NWl!'AE1� ss4�od u�smi �� °ul J Y r I � «• •,, OI�'�fl9 1�bi�€71 ��€iY7�l4�1 '�u� �s��a��y�.r� oayS . , .. �P.@' All!{B9�JkBPt"i ,� i � I� �v�- ,, (� �� , i� i� �` r 1 r � lf' f. �� i d �� C� ,� 6 f: ,` a- r J� }' � �- ;�,i -�_, I ' I: i� � �iI : � �. ' '._ o- i� �, �� i � ��.1 L-1 ' � I � � --j=- a I �� ' o- �-�., �� (1— I F'; ' f j � ' � r , _i � � c� i-��►'- '`, �� s �; c�- , , �}, ' , F� �p .I �j i �;i { � � i �� I� � � 1c111 ❑ � � � �' I S � i o I' -� - ( 1 i � �.--;� o-� C?- ; � , f_ ; I�' a I �F � J_:I %!,�)` �` f � ' 'R � � i � }� ;, �.� ,. z �; �� -� �' �-�—, � I �:. ,_ � � e '� �! ;�.-; ! I i _ � ,•r• #"= ' �� i ; � � (� � s i � �_ 1 � r o�-- .�f� � - . � — , C ` �. s� a t t, � L. S 1 i � t ; . �-�� -- - � I ;�I� ,� ,, ; , �- � 1 t t ' i- 1( � i J �� a (a � (� � + -- s i I �' ` � ` I �s � � � i o-� �:. , , , � � r " � �- ,-- si r, t� � � ; d IF i. !� ?f _ � � � , �� f ! ' f' i,ii �' � _ .� �� i � �I �� ''� �� !I. W+s �� ; i i � f I i i i � � � ; ; � � c��roF F�� DATE: TO: C011IiMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM February 8, 1990 William Burns, City Manager �.�`� FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Ordinances Regarding Vacations and Adoption of Replacement Ordinances Staff recommends the City Council approve for second and final reading the ordinances repealing Ordinances No. 930 and No. 936. Secondly, staff recommends the City Council approve for second and final reading the ordinances containing the correct Iegal descriptions for vacations of the above noted easements. BD:ls M-90-34 2 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL ORDINANCE NO. 930 PERTAINING TO VACATION OF A DRAINAGE AND IITILITY EASEMENT The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 930 contained an erroneous legal description regarding the vacation of a drainage and utility easement. SECTION 2. Because of the erroneous legal description, Ordinance No. 930 shall be repealed in its entirety. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK First Reading: January 22, 1990 Second Reading: Publication: C�� 3 AN ORDINANCE REQARDING AN ADDITION ORDINANCE NO. REPEALZNG ORDINANCB NO. 936 EABEMENT VACATION IN ONAWAY The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. SECTION 2. Ordinance No. 936 contained an erroneous legal description regarding the vacation of an easement. Because of the erroneous legal description, Ordinance Na. 936 shall be repealed in its entirey. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLYAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK First Reading: January 22, 1990 Second Reading: Publication: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE IIND$R BECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATB BTREETB AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDI% C OF THE CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. For the vacation of drainage and utility easements as shown on the plat of Gena-Rae Addition as filed as Document Number 36798 on the 25th day of September, 1961, described as follows: That part of the north six (6) feet of Tracts G and H of Registered Land Survey No. 94, except the west five (5) feet of said Tract H; and That part of the east one (1) foot of the west six (6) feet of Tracts H and I of Registered Land Survey No. 94, except the north six (6) feet of said Tract H. All lying in the North Half of Section 13, T-30, R- 24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Be and is hereby vacated. SECTION 2. The intent of the above vacations is to eliminate the drainage and utility easements as noted on the Gena-Rae Addition plat as described above. Any and all easements filed since the recording of Registered Land Survey No. 94 are to remain easements of record. SECTION 3. The said vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: First Reading Second Reading: Publication: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR July 24, 1989 January 22, 1990 � ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE IINDER BLCTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STRELTS AND 11LLEY8 AND TO AMEND APPENDI% C OF THE CZTY CODS The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. To vacate the west 27 feet of an existing easement filed as Document Number 89063 described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 23, Block 3, Onaway Addition; thence north along the east line of Lot 23, Block 3, a distance of 22 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence west parallel with the south line of said Lot 23, Block 3, a distance of 252 feet; thence north parallel with the east line of said Lot 23, Block 3, a distance of 30 feet; thence east parallel with the south line of Lot 23, Block 3, to the east line of Lot 22, Block 3; thence south along the east line of Lot 22 and Lot 23, a distance of 30 feet to the actual point of beginning. All lying in the South Half of Section 3, T-30, R- 24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: October 2, 1989 January 22, 1990 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR __ 5 MEMORANDUM MEMORANDUM 7 � c i e r•t F r� ��. r WiMiam C. Hunt _ ss� � u��.•.•��y A..�.• N.E. F r�a i• r, r i p�• • o�. s 6� a 2 Assistant to the City Mana�er ►�o�• (stt)671•�4s0 MEMO TO: 1PILLIAM W. BIIRNS� CITY MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM C. HIINT, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER �� SIIBJECT: COIINCIL BALARIEB DATE: JANUARY 30, 1990 The following table presents the history of Council salaries over the past 19 years: YEAR 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 MAYOR 4620 4851 6600 6600 6600 6600 6600 6600 6600 6600 6600 6600 6600 6900 6900 7200 7500 7500 8000 COIINCILMEMBER- AT-LARGE 3960 4158 5400 5400 5400 5400 5400 5400 5400 5400 5400 5400 5400 5650 5650 5900 6150 6150 6550 WARD COIINCIL- MEMBERS 3960 4158 4800 4800 4800 4800 4800 4800 4800 4800 4800 4800 4800 5025 5025 5250 5475 5475 5850 AVE. INCREASE OVER pREVIOIIS YEAR 5.00% 22.89% 0.00� 0.00� 0.00� 0.00$ 0.00$ 0.00$ 0.00% 0.00$ 0.00$ 0.00� 4.64$ 0.00$ 4.43$ 4.25$ 0.00$ 6.73$ I am enclosing an ordinance which, if passed, would raise the salaries of the City Council by 4.67$ in 1991. I request that you present this ordinance for first reading at the council meeting of February 12, 1990. WCH/jb Q 7q ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING TH$ FRIDLEY CITY CODS BY AMENDING APPENDI% F TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADJIISTMENT OF SALARIES FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH 88CTION 2.07 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: The annual salaries for the Mayor and Councilmembers during 1991 and subsequent years shall be as follows: Mayor $ 8,400.00 Councilmember-at-Large $ 6,900.00 Councilmember, Ward I $ 6,100.00 Councilmember, Ward II $ 6,100.00 Councilmember, Ward III $ 6,100.00 In addition, the Mayor and Councilmembers shall be entitled to the same benefits enjoyed by full-time authorized employees of the City of Fridley. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: � � c�nroF F� �� C4�1/IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT' MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7, 1990 � TO: William Burns, City Manager ��' � FROM: SUBJECT: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Lisa Campbell, Planning Associate Recycling Survey As per your request, a proposal and proposed contract has been obtained from C. J. Olson Associates to complete a citizen survey on recycling. The proposed survey includes questions on recycling, yard waste, and solid waste abatement management strategies. Four hundred residents will be surveyed at a cost of $12,243.00, not to exceed $13,468.00. The cost of the survey will be covered by the 1990 Anoka County Solid Waste Grant. Purpose The purpose of the survey is to quantify Fridley residents' attitudes and preferences toward proposed changes in the City's solid waste programming, recycling incentives such as containers, low volume fees or lotteries, and yard waste disposal options. A survey will be helpful in developing the City's long range solid waste policy. Because the survey will give quantitative data regarding resident preferences, it will allow us to predict how residents may respond to proposed changes in programming. Recommendation Staff, along with the Environmental Quality an requests that Council act to authorize the Cit the contract with C. J. Olson for a recycling LC:ls M-90-88 d Energy Commission, y Manager to execute survey. � C.J. OLSON MARKET RESEARCH, INC. THRESHER SQUP,RE BUILDING 708 SOUTH THIRD STREET SUITE 105E MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55415 PHONE: 612/340-1262 FAX: 612/334-3169 PROJECT AGREEMENT PROJECT # 9020-425 C.J. OISON MARKET RESEARCH, INC. AGREES TO: Conduct research for the City of Fridley regarding recycling and waste management issues. Four hundred telephone interviews will be completed from the Olson Phone Center. Full analysis and report will be presented at completion of proj ect . SCHEDULED PROJECT DATES: Dependent on city manager and council approval. THE UNDERSIGNED AGREES TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS OF PAYMENT: Design ........................... $ 1,128.00 Sampling ......................... $ 576.00 Data Collection� .................. $ 4,729.00 Data Processing .................. $ 3,310.00 Analysis and Report .............. $ 2,500.00 TOTAL ........ $ 12,243.00 (COSTS WILL NOT EXCEED $ 13,468.00) TERMS: 50� due at project approval and balance at completion. C.J. OISON MARKET RESEARCH, INC. BY: DATE: CITY OF FRIDLEY BY: DATE: : � �J CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMI88ION M88TING, JANUARY 31, 1990 wrw.wwra..w�w.r.►.�.w�.�..u.w.r.�.w�.�.w...rrwrrrw�wwr�rw►ww1w.w�w��rwr..wr.�.w�w.r.�..�.wr.�.w�.rwr.�.�r�rw.w.wrwn�►w.w.wrw.wr.�. w. CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Betzold called the January 31, 1990, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Members Absent: Don Betzold, Dave Kondrick, Alex Barna, Paul Dahlberg Sue Sherek, Dean Saba Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Dale Edstrom, Northco Corp. Kelly Doran, Robert Larsen Partners, Inc. APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 6 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to approve the December 6, 1989, Planning Commission minutes as written. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. #90-01 BY ROBERT LARSEN PARTNERS, INC.: To replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park, into two separate parcels, generally located directly east of University Avenue, north of 71st Avenue, and south of 73rd Avenue. Ms. McPherson stated that the petitioner is requesting to replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park into two separate parcels. Northco Business Park (which is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial) was recently platted. The purpose of replatting Lot 2 into two separate parcels is partially due to the fact that this is a two- phase project and in order to receive financing for this project, the lender has requested that there be a separate legal description for each phase of the project. Ms. McPherson stated that when Northco Business Park was platted as part of the development agreement, there were cor►cerns regarding the issues of architectural standards, landscaping . . PLANNINa COMMI88ION 1dE$TINa. J�1R. 31. 1990 PAGE 2 requirements, and stormwater management requirements. This particular proposal takes into account those items outlined in the development agreement. Ms. McPherson stated that across both parcels, a ponding easement is proposed which should be adequate area to ensure retention space for the required stormwater management. The City Engineer has also requested that the stormwater calculations be submitted so that he can check to make sure this is, in fact, an adequate retention area. Ms. McPherson stated the architectural standards have been taken into account. It is a one-story building composed of a brick and metal facade. In addition, the petitioner has submitted a preliminary landscape plan which includes many of the existing trees on the site. There are some weak spots along the southwest portion of the site as far as screening of perimeter parking, and that is one of the stipulations recommended by staff. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the replat request with the following stipulations: 1. Stormwater calculations shall be submitted prior to insurance of a building permit. 2. Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both parcels prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. A ponding easement(s) sha11 be dedicated on the plat or by separate document prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. Ms. McPherson stated Phase II is not shown on the site plan; however, the circulation pattern will be such that the rear driveways will continue northward and will exit out onto the service drive that will create a circular driving pattern. There is a driveway which will exit out onto Northco Drive as well. Mr. Barna asked if a variance will be required for the zero lot line driveway. There was no problem when it was one property, but now there are going to be two properties. Ms. Dacy stated that again they are going back to the interpretation of the ordinance (similar to SBF Corporation) that if it is a joint driveway and if the lot line goes through the NI ] PLANNINt3 COMMISSION KEBTING. JAld. 31. 1990 PAGE 3 driveway and not the parking spaces, it was determined that a variance is not needed. Mr. Dahlberg asked if that was only if the buildings meet the setback requirements. Ms. Dacy stated that, yes, the building has to meet the setback requirements. Mr. Barna asked if the proposed building is going to meet the setback requirements against this lot line. Ms. McPherson stated this can be checked prior to the City Council meeting. Mr. Kelly Doran stated that the sideyard setback is 20 feet, and the distance from the building to the lot line is 20 ft. The same is true for the building to the north as well. The driveway to the south will be approximately 30 ft. in depth from curb to curb and then a 5 ft. landscaped area adjacent to both buildings for a total of 40 ft. between the two properties. Ms. Dacy stated the sideyard setback is 20 ft.; however, where a driveway is to be provided in the sideyard, the minimum required sideyard increases to 30 ft. so the petitioner might have to shift the lot line. Mr. Doran stated that in phase 2 the other option is to come back and simply join the two properties together again. That would eliminate the need for increased setback. The primary reason for splitting the two lots is for financing purposes. Mr. Betzold stated there is always the possibility that a different person buy one of the lots and develop it. Mr. Doran stated that is a remote possibility. Mr. Kondrick stated the petitioner should be aware that if that ever happens, it would necessitate a variance. Mr. Doran stated he thought the issue can be resolved with staff. He appreciated the Commission's concern. Mr. Doran stated the stipulations as proposed are acceptable to them. OTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE PIIBLIC BEARING CLOSED AT 7:40 P.M. 9C PLANNING COMMISSION MBETING, JAN. 31. 1990 PAGE 4 Mr. Dahlberg stated that regarding the discussion about the appropriate location for the property line, he would recommend another stipulation that states: Any change or modification to the property line as proposed shall be resolved with staff prior to review by the City Council. MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Barna, to recommend to City Council approval of Preliminary Plat, P.S. #90-01, by Robert Larsen Partners, Inc., to replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park, into two separate parcels, generally located directly east of University Avenue, north of 71st Avenue, and south of 73rd Avenue, with the following stipulations: 1. 2. Stormwater calculations shall be submitted prior to insurance of a building permit. Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both parcels prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. A ponding easement(s) shall be dedicated on the plat or by separate document prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Any change or modification proposed shall be resolved by the City Council. to the property line as with staff prior to review IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED DNANIMOIISLY. Ms. Dacy stated that because of the petitioners' particular demands to start construction and their commitments to their tenants, they requested that the City Council establish a public hearing in advance of the Planning Commission meeting, so that public hearing will be on February 12, 1990. 2. 1990 WORKPLAN AND EVALUATION OF 1989 AGCOMPLISHMENTS: Ms. Dacy stated that at the December 6, 1989, Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the "14 Ways to Build a Better Commission". One of the items the Commission wanted to look at was what they have been doing in the past year, determine how they did it, and set some new goals for the upcoming year. Ms. Dacy stated she had come up with a draft evaluation for the Commission's review. As far as 1989 was concerned, she made a . � PLANNING COMMISSION MEBTING. JAN. 31. 1990 PAGE 5 Iist of all of the major issues the Commission discussed and then came up with an Evaluation Matrix for the Commission to rate the Commission's perfonaance for each of those issues and to rate staff's performance for each of those issues. Ms. Dacy stated she would also like the Commission to go through the four issues for 1990. The Commission might have some issues to add to this list. Mr. Betzold stated he would like to table discussion until Ms. Sherek and Mr. Saba can be in attendance. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to table discussion of the 1989 Accomplishments and 1990 Workplan until all Planning Commission members are present. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. Ms. Dacy stated she had also included in the agenda a memo to Mr. Burns dated January 16, 1990, regarding the Community Development Department's Priorities and Accomplishments for 1990/1989. She stated this is something Mr. Burns has requested, and it will be done on a quarterly basis. 3. REVIEW HOUSING WORKSHOP MEMORANDUM: Ms. Dacy stated this memo is for the Commission's information. It lists the types of things they will see in the Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. McPherson and she went to this workshop. It was a very helpful workshop. The Metropolitan Council is very aggressive on this issue, and housing has become a priority. Jack Kemp, Secretary of HUD, will be speaking at the State of Region address on March 7, 1990. 4. CENTRAL AVENUE CORRIDOR UPDATE: Ms. Dacy stated this update summarizes the results of the City Council's discussion at their January 8, 1990, meeting. Mr. Betzold attended that meeting. Mr. Betzold stated he thought one of the Council's main concern was that they thought the Planning Commission was advocating rezoning everything up and down Central Avenue. They articulated a number of criteria as to what kind of development they would like to see, their long range goals along Central Avenue, etc. Although there have been other discussions, this is the first time the Council has ever outlined everything they want to see along Old Central, and the information was very helpful. After a long discussion, he thought the Council agreed that they do want to do something to improve the Central Avenue Corridor, but they 9E PLANNINa COMMISBION 1�8ETINd, Jl�N. 31. 1990 PAGE 6 would like to talk to people along Central Avenue and encourage people to voluntarily rezone. Mr. Barna stated he had assumed that from previous planning documents and discussions, these were things the Planning Commission would like to see happen, not what they demand, and in reality, some of these things may never happen. Mr. Dahlberg stated he thought the Planning Commission members all feel comfortable enough with what they have done to this point to say that they don't see it as something etched in stone. Mr. Dahlberg asked if it was the position of the City Council that the Planning Commission should re-evaluate what they have done to this point and bring back new recommendations, or reject it in its entirety and leave the Corridor as it is? Ms. Dacy stated there is sentence in Phase I and Phase II that says: "After completion of the Comprehensive Plan, consider rezoning properties and marketing them as they become available." The Council recommended to delete that sentence and state that they would encourage property owners to rezone on a voluntary basis, instead of the City starting the rezoning process. 5. SENIOR HOUSING STUDY UPDATE: Ms. Dacy stated Mr. Burns' memo dated January 4, 1990, regarding "TIF Guidelines for Senior Housing" summarizes the Council's informal consensus regarding senior housing financial policies. Basically, the Council said that the current policies are acceptable for senior housing projects and listed three ways the HRA currently uses to assist the projects. Item #4 identifies the basic criteria for the guidelines. 6. CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE: Ms. Dacy stated this schedule was included in the agenda for the Planning Commission's information. 7. RECEIVE NOVEMBER 6 1989 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the November 6, 1989, Parks and Recreation Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, C$AIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANZMOIISLY. 8. RECEIVE NOVEMBER 28. 1989, ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: 9F PLANNINa CO��II+II88ION MEBTINa. JAN. 31. 1990 PAQE 7 OT ON by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the November 28, 1989, Environmental Quality and Enerqy Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICB VOTE, ALL VOTII�TG l�YE, CSAIRP$R80N BBTZOLD DBCLARED THE MOTION CARRZED QNANIMOUSLY. 9. RECEIVE DECEMBER 7. 1989. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES• ION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive December 7, 1989, Human Resources Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTB, ALL VOTINa AY$, CHAIRP$R80N BETZOLD DECLARED THE lrlOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 10. RECEIVE DECEMBER 24, 1989, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES• MOT ON by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the December I4, 1989, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON HETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 11. RECEIVE DECEMBER 19, 1989, ENVIRONMENTAL 4UALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: OTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the December 19, 1989, Environmental Quality and Energy Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 12. RECEIVE JANUARY 4. 1990, HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the January 4, 1990, Human Resources Commission minutes. IIPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY$, CBAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED IINANIMOIIBLY. 13. RECEIVE JANUARY 23, 1990. APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: O�I TION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the January 23, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DBCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANZMOIISLY. 9G PLANNINd CO�I88ION ME$TING. JAN. 31. 1990 PAGE 8 14. RECEIVE JANUARY 8 1990 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to receive the January 8, 1990, Parks and Recreation Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AY$, CSAIRPBRSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED OIJANIMOII$LY. Mr. Kondrick stated that on page 9, the Commission made a motion to the City Council stating: "that the Parks and Recreation Commission strongly encourages the City Council to apply for the Canadian Geese Relocation Program through the Department of Natural Resources with the State of Oklahoma, understanding that they may not be able to get on this program this year due to the high demand for this program by other communities, but to apply for possible approval in subsequent years. This is an ongoing program for 3-4 years with a potential. outlay of $3,000-4,000 per year." Mr. Kondrick stated he wanted to make the Commission members aware that this motion will be going to the City Council in the near future. 15. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Liqht Rail Transit IIpdate Ms. Dacy stated she had included the recent newsletter for the Commission's information. There will be a public meeting on February 13, 1990, at 7:00 p.m. at the Fridley High School. Ms. Dacy stated the City will be receiving a rezoning application for the northeast corner of Mississippi/ University for redevelopment of the 10,000 Auto Parts site. The developers are proposing to demolish the building and acquire the two single family homes immediately adjacent to the parcel, one abutting Mississippi Street and one abutting b6th Avenue. Those parcels, as well as the vacant piece north of 10,000 Auto Parts are zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. The 10,000 Auto Parts site is zoned C-1, Local Business. The rezoning for the proposed redevelopment is S-2, Redevelopment District. Ms. Dacy stated the redevelopment proposal is for 28,000 sq. ft. of retail with Walgreen's as the anchor tenant and other smaller shops. Ms. Dacy stated this redevelopment involves the LRT issue, because they were looking at the 10,000 Auto PLANNING COMliI88ION KE$TIN�3. Jl�N. 31. 1990 PAGE 9 b. Parts site for a"park and ride" lot. They have been meeting with Anoka County over the last 2 1/2 months, and they think they have a proposed short term and long term solution. Ms. Dacy stated the developers will be conducting a neighborhood meeting on Thursday, February 15, 1990, at the Municipal Center. The rezoning is scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission on March 14, 1990. Not only are the LRT issues going to be involved, but also the compatibility issues between the commercial center and the neighborhood. Ms. Dacy stated that as far as the short term issue on LRT, they are looking at prioritizing the expansion of some of the lanes on Mississippi Street for bus drop- off, not necessarily using the parking lot as a"park and ride". However, they are looking at reserving one row of parking spaces for the initial start-up of the LRT system. Ms. Dacy stated that as far as the long term issue, Anoka County is evaluating the acquisition of eight lots to the north of 66th Avenue and directly north of the subject property and converting that land into a park and ride lot. Northco and Economic Development Districts Ms. Dacy stated Northco has a purchase agreement on the loopback parcel on the corner of 73rd/University Avenues (former Phillips 66 proposal) and has reached an agreement with Soo Line Railroad to develop I8,000 sq. ft. of one-story office and retail. The major tenant would be a bank, and it is currently proposed as Western State Bank. Ms. Dacy stated the property does have poor soil conditions so Northco is requesting soil correction assistance from the HRA. The City is creating a tax increment district (Tax Increment No. 10) to use the property taxes to give back to the developer to correct the soil problems. The City Council has established a public hearing for February 26, 1990. Tax Increment District #10 will be retired when the soil correction has been completed in 2-3 years. Ms. Dacy stated the other site is the Pro Engineering site, and that is for an industrial building. It will be the same process, a pay-as-you-go approach. The district will be retired when the assistance is complete in 3-4 years. r�� 1 I 91 �LANNING COMMIBSION MS$TIN(3. Jl�N. 31. 1990 PAGE 10 ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to adjourn the meeting. IIpon a voiae vote, all votinq aye, Chairperson Betzold declared tbe January 31, 1990, Planninq Commission adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Respectfully sub itted, yn Saba Recording Secretary � � cinroF F�� DATE: TO: C0�IILMUNIT� DEVEL�PMENT DEPARTMENT' MEMORRN DUM January 26, 1990 William Burns, City Manager FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #90-01 Attached is the staff report for the variance request, VAR #90-01, by Leroy Signs (for Minikahda Mini Storage). The petitioner is requesting a variance to the Sign Code to increase the maximum square footage of a free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 177 sq. ft. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the request to the City Council. Staff recommends that the City Council deny the variance request, VAR #90-01, on the basis that: l. 2. MM:ls M-90-53 There is adequate square footage (133 sq. ft.) on the existing sign to meet the request of the petitioner. The application did not meet the ordinance criteria. 10 - � 10A � STAFF REP�RT APPEALS DATE Jar,uazy 23, 1990 CtTY OF �� c.o�rss� oA� FRIDLEY q1Y OOl�1CIL DATE F�� 12, 1990 �� REQUEST PERMtT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSEO REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES � ZONNG UTLITES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FTIANCIAL NVIPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREFENSNE PLAN COMPATBILfTY WITH AOJACENT USES 8 ZONNG ENYIRONMENTAL CONSDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEPDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNNVG COMMISSlON RECONNAENDATION VAR #90-01 Qzris Clark, Leroy Sic�s Increase allawable square footage of a sign fran 80 sq. ft. to 177 sq. ft. 5350 Industrial Boulevard (r9inikahda Mini Storage) N�-2, Heavy Industrial M-2, Heavy Industrial, on all sides Denial Denial 10B Staff Report VAR #90-01, 5350 Industrial Blvd. Page 2 A. PIIBLIC PIIRPOSE 88RVED BY REQIIIREMENT: Section 214.12.02.B requires a maximum square footage for a free-standing sign of 80 sq. ft. Public purpose served by this requirement is to control visual pollution caused by excessive signage. B. BTATED BARDBHIP: No stated hardship C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVI$W: Request The petitioner is requesting a variance to Section 214.12 of the Sign Code to increase the size of a free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 177 sq. ft. The sign text within the additional square footage will be used for directions to direct traffic off of I-694. Site The site is located south of I-694 and is bordered on the east by the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. It is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, with additional heavy industrial zoning on all sides. There is also a Naegele billboard near the northeast corner of the site. Analysis History In 1985, Minikahda applied for a sign variance to increase the allowable square footage of a free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 200 sq. ft. This request was in conjunction with the plat request for Great Northern Industrial Center East, P.S. #85-03. After considerable discussion concerning the general size of the sign, other siqns in the area, and the traffic on I-694, the Appeals Commission recommended denial of the variance to the City Council (see attached minutes). The Council approved a variance to increase the free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 133 sq. ft. if Minikahda agreed to put no wall signage toward the I-694 frontage, and to limit the wall signage near the entrance to 120 sq. ft. Staff Report VAR #90-01, 5350 Industrial Boulevard Page 3 Current Request The petitioner is requesting a variance in order to add a 32 sq. ft. internally lit sign with the text, "Exit South on East River Road". Section 214.21 of the Sign Code allows for variances from the literal provisions of the Sign Code. In order to receive a variance, the applicant must prove the following: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply to other property in the same vicinity and uses. It was argued in a previous case that Minikahda Mini Storage does not have the luxury of immediate access from I-694. This is true; however, Plywood Minnesota, Wickes, and LeMaur (Dow Brands) are in similar situations. LaMaur was granted a variance for their sign to 120 sq. ft. , and Plywood Minnesota does have a sign of 300 sq. ft., which was grand- fathered in 1976 (the original permit was issued in 1970). B. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and district; but which is denied to the property in question. As was mentioned in (A) above, other signs in the vicinity were granted variances, as was Minikahda. With the exception of the Plywood Minnesota sign, Minikahda does have a sign comparable in size to others in the vicinity. Denying the variance would not be denying a substantial property right. C. That the strict application of the Chapter would constitute an unnecessary hardship. By denying the variance, 133 sq. ft. of sign area would remain. This is ample space to rearrange the sign test necessary to attract customers and direct traffic. 10C 10D Staff Report VAR #90-01, 5350 Industrial Boulevard Page 4 D. That the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district in which the property is located. The public purpose served by Section 214.12.02.B is to reduce the amount of visual pollution caused by excessive signage. Granting the variance would be contrary to that intent. Further, authorizing larger signs would also be contrary to City policy of attempting to remove billboards along I-694 (see stipulation on Great Northern plat). Recommendation Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the variance to increase the allowable square footage of a free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 177 sq. ft. on the basis that: 1. There is adequate square footage (133 sq. ft.) on the existing sign to meet the request of the petitioner. 2. The application did not meet the ordinance criteria, items A-D, in the above report. ApAeals Commission Recommendation The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the request to the City Council. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission's action and deny the variance request. CZTY OF 1�RIDLEY APPBliLB COI�QII88ZOl�i MEBTZN�i, JANUARY 23, 1990 �..�.�.r 1rw.�rww. �r w��. � �.�►�►r �r� �. �r�.. w.ww.�.w.rw�.��r w� �rw�.w� � �.w.ww1rw wn�. � �rw.r w�w��•��•��rw..r�w..�... �Ai.I, TO ORDER • Chairperson Barna called the January 23, 2990, Appeals Comiaission meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. �OLL CALL• Members Present: Alex Barna, Kenneth Vos, Larry Kuechle Members Absent: Diane Savage Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Bob Lear, 333 N. Washington Ave., Suite 500, Mpls. (Minikahda Mini Storage) APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 10, 1989 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: O ON by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the October 10, 1989, Appeals Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, l�LL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER80N BPiRNA DECLl�RED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMODSLY. 1. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST. VAR #90-01. BY LEROY IS GNS: Pursuant to Section 214.12.02.B of the Fridley City Code to increase the maximum square footage of a free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 177.25 sq. ft. on Lot 1, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2, Great Northern Industrial Center East, the same being 5350 Sndustrial Boulevard (Minikahda Mini Storage). OM TION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Dr. Vos, to open the public hearing. IIPON �1 VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING l�YE, CHAZRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE PDBLZC BEARING OPEN AT 7:38 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated that to give a the history of this request, Minikahda Mini Storage applied for a sign variance in 1985 to increase the allowable square footage of a free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 200 sq. ft. This request was in relation to Great Northern Industrial Center East Plat, P.S. #85-03. At the Aug. 12, 1985, meeting, the Appeals Commission members discussed the general EI�I � _ �PP$�L8 COK�IIBSION MESTING. Ji�►AY Z3. 1��0 — P�GE 2 size of the sign, other signs in the area (LaMaur, Plywood Minnesota, and the Naegele billboard), and the amount of traffic on I-694. The Appeals Commission recommended denial. After that, the Council approved a variance to increase the free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 133 sq. ft. with some stipulations. Those stipulations were that there was to be no wall signage toward the I-694 frontage and to limit the wall signage near the entrance to 120 sq. ft. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting an additional 32 sq. ft. in order to add a directional sign to direct traffic to the East River Road exit off I-694. Ms. McPherson stated that within the Sign Code, there is a provision which allows variances to any particular chapter of the Sign Code. However, in order to receive a variance, the petitioner must prove four particular provisions. Those provisions are outlined in the staff report and are listed below: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply to other property in the same vicinity and uses. r� It was argued in a previous case that Minikahda Mini Storage does not have the luxury of immediate access from I-694. This is true; however, Plywood Minnesota, Wickes, and LeMaur (Dow Brands) are in similar situations. LaMaur was granted a variance for their sign to 120 sq. ft. , and Plywood Minnesota does have a sign of 300 sq. ft., which was grand- fathered in 1976 (the original permit was issued in 1970). B. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and district; but which is denied to the property in question. As was mentioned in (A) above, other signs in the vicinity were granted variances, as was Minikahda. With the exception of the Plywood Minnesota sign, Minikahda does have a sign comparable in size to others in the vicinity. Denying the variance would not be denying a substantial property right. C. That the strict application of the Chapter would constitute an unnecessary hardship. By denying the variance, 133 sq. ft. of sign area would remain. This is ample space to rearrange the 10G APP�ALB COI�lIIBSION MIB$TING, J]i1I�TUl�RY 23, 1990 PAGE 3 sign test necessary to attract customers and direct traffic. D. That the qranting of the variance would nat be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district in which the property is located. The public purpose served by Section 214.12.02.8 is to reduce the amount of visual pollution caused by excessive siqnage. Granting the variance would be contrary to that intent. Further, authorizing larqer siqns would also be contrary to City policy of attempting to remove billboards alonq I-694. Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending that the Appeals Commission deny the variance on the basis that there is adequate square footage (133 sq. ft.) on the existing sign to meet the petitioner's request and that the application did not meet the ordinance provisions. Mr. Barna stated he stated he would make the same point he made on the Great Northern Industrial Center Plat and that is that it is almost impossible for anyone traveling west on I-694 to turn around and see the sign and still be able to exit onto East River Road. By the time anyone traveling east on I-694 sees the sign, they are already past the East River Road exit. Dr. Vos stated he did not think anyone can see the sign very well eastbound because of the railroad bridge. It can only be seen westbound. Mr. Bob Lear stated he is representing Minikahda Mini Storage. He stated he is from Bloomington so he is not familiar with this facility. He stated the mini storage business is about 50� drive- by. He stated this business is very difficult to find, because it is not visible at all. People do see the sign because they get telephone calls, but very few people know how to get to the facility. Mr. Lear stated the sign is already at 133 sq. ft.; and even though the sign text could be reorganized, it would have to be taken down and replaced. This would be much more costly than just adding on to the existing sign. He stated the sign will remain at the same height. They need the larger sign because it is just dwarfed by other signs in the area. Mr. Lear stated that in the first year of operation, occupancy went to 50$ and it is still at 50�. As a representative of Minikahda Mini Storage, he feels this is due to the fact that people do not know how to get to the facility. 7►pP87�iL8 C014iIBBION 1L8BTIl�iG. �7'A�iQ�RY ��. �990 PlrGB 4 Mr. Barna stated the business is definitely at a disadvantage because it is hidden from view. However, he did not think the increase in siqnaqe square footaqe would help the bueiness at all. He suqqested Minikahda Mini Storaqe advertise its business with location information in local coupon books or local newspapers. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Ruechle, to close the public hearing. IIPON !� VOICE VOTE, l�LL VOTING AYE, CHliIRPSRBON BARNA DBCLARED THE PIIBLIC HBliRING CLOBED li1T 8:00 P.M. Dr. Vos stated the existing sign more desirable for the business. variance for an additional 32 sq. could be redesiqned to make it He was not supportive of a ft. Mr. Kuechle agreed. He stated staff has outlined four provisions that must be met in order to justify the granting of a variance. He did not see a hardship that falls under any of those four provisions; therefore, he could not vote in favor of granting the variance. Mr. Barna stated he could not see that the additional square footage would help the visibility of the sign and, therefore, would accomplish nothing, other than a bigger, qaudier sign. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City Council denial of variance request, VAR �90-01, by Leroy Signs, pursuant to Section 214.12.02.B of the Fridley City Code to increase the maximum square footage of a free-standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 177.25 sq. ft. on Lot 1, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2, Great Northern Industrial Center East, the same being 5350 Industrial Boulevard (Minikahda Mini Storaqe). IIPON A VOICE VOTE� 7�►LI� VOTZNG AYE, CSAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOIISLY. � Ms. Dacy stated this item will go to City Council on February 12, 1990. AUTOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr . Kuechle, seconded by Dr .� Vos , to adj ourn the meeting . Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Chairperson Barna declared the Jaauary 23, 1990, l�ppeals Commissioa meetinq adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, � Lyn Saba Recording Secretary 10H 101 APPEALS COF'1MISSION NIEETING, ACIGUST 13, 1985 PAGE 3 MOTION BY PlR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY PlS. GEROU, � RECOMMEND T1D CITY COUNCIL �AL OF VARIANCE REQUESTS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 205 OF TiiE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO BUILD ON LESS THAN 1-1/2 ACRES AND T1� HAYE A ZERO SIDE YARD SETBACK LW THE NORTX PROPERTY LINE, WITX TXE FOLLOWING STIPULATiQNS: I. TfIE GRANTING OF A JOINT DRIVEWAY EASSMENT FRO�! THE JOINT TENANTS TO TXE BUILDING TO THE SOUTH; 2. THE NORTH WALL BE A FOUR-HOUR RATED FIRE WALL WITX NO OPENINGS UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CFiAIRPERSQN GABEL DECLARED TXE 1HOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated this item would go to City Council on Sept. 9. 3. CONSIDERA7ION OF A VARIANCE R EST PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 214_OF THE FRIDLEY �, ► ; � � � :1 r � ,�� r�•� �� ^ �� •� � ri�;,��lSy�dc7�ltls"LC».►1lfl.�f�.'i��(�l�ll:L��i��lA��1►tc�'f � ' � , . � , � r �7LI�ICKHLL i LUI.N t CU WGJ 4 Vf DURI.li�u avn nvr� � u�nn a.�v • -- --- . � � � f t , , equest y on onson, . t treet, . , ox , . au , n. 64) MOTION BY MS. GEROU, SECONDED BY AlR. BETZOLD, TO REMOVE THE ITF.lN FROM THE TABLE . UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. GERDU, TO OPEN TF/E PUBLIC HEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8;00 P.M. Chairperson Gabel read the Administrative Staff Report: ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REPORT 4055 East River Road A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.18.5D.5d requires that all parking and hard surface areas shall be no closer than five (5) feet from the main building. Public purpose served by this requirement is to protect the building from unnecessary maintenance due to vehicles E�itting the 6uilding. 10J APPEALS COMI�IISSION �IEETING, AUGUST 13, 1985 PAGE 4 Section 214.12.2B requires a maximum size of eighty (80) square feet in area per development. Public purpose served by this requirement is to control visual pollution and excessive use of signs in comnercia] areas. B. STATED NARDSNIP: "205.18.SD.5d - Concrete curbing is not necessary and is economically unjustified." "205.12.2B - In order for business to be successful we need good visibility of our sign from 694." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF RFVIEW: Deveiopment plans caiis for platting of 7.7 acres of industrial land south of I-694 and on the west border of Burlington Northern tracks. Plans call for the construction of 125,250 square feet of mini-storage warehouse space. The M-2 heavy industrial zoning is appropriate for this use, Along with the development tE�e petitioner is requesting a vari.ance waiver for installation of concrete curbing 5 feet off the buildings. The staff realizes that with the many door openings on this building standard curbs would be impractical. We recommend a 5 foot concrete apron in lieu of a raised curb. The apron would provide for separation of building and driveway, channelization of drainage as well as a clean uniform appearance. All other curbing areas, for example, perimeter, lat curbing and curbing at the blank ends of bui]ding should be raised 6" concrete curbing per code. A second variance request is for square footage of free-standing sign area from 80 square feet to 200 square feet. An adjacent sign for Plywood Minnesota has 300 square feet, with a variance granted in the spring of 1976. LaMaur has a 120 square foot sign, with a variance granted in the fail of i982. More recently, in OctoDer 1984, East River Road Business Center was denied a variance request to increase the size of a real estate sign from 50 square feet to 300 square feet. Petitioner should provide evidence that this size increase is necessary. Mr. Clark stated they have received more current plans for the buflding and parking and driveway circulation. The design of the building pretty well dictates that the curbing or separation from the parking and driving aisle cannot be maintained so the variance from 5 ft, to 0 ft, along the front of the garages almost has to be approved because of the way this is being designed. Therefore, the recomnendations made by staff in the staff report were not necessarily apropos,to this situation. 10K APPEALS CON�IISSION MEETIN6, AUGUST 13, 1985 PAGE 5 Mr. C]ark stated the Canmission had received at the meeting a letter from B. 6. Chapman of Barton-Aschman Assoc., Inc., which spelled out the reasons for the request for sign variance, NfDR'ION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY MS. GEROU� TO RECEIYE INTO THE RECORD THE LETTER DATED AUGUST 12� 1985� FROM MR. CHAPMAN TO THE APPEALS C01�AlI5SION. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN6 AYE, CXAIRPERSGW GABEL DECLARED TXE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. C1ark stated one thing that will be addressed with. the plat at City Council is the existing Naegele billboard located adjacent to tE�is property. Staff is recommending to City Council that this billboard be removed, Burlington Northern is the petitioner with the plat, and tf►e Cfty Council can deal directly with Burlington Northern with the plat on which the billboard is located. Mr. Ekstrum stated he was legal counsei for the petiti.oner. Ne stated also in the audience were Jon Monson, the petitioner and President of Investment Management, and Bill Chapman, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. Ekstrum stated they would sifiply request that the second variance regarding the curbing and 5 ft. setback be withdrawn. The way constructl.on of the stor.age facility has been presented, t�at would simply not be appropriate for the request for variance. Mr. Ekstrum stated what they are asking for is a variance for a free-standing sign. He would like to make the following points regarding the sign variance request: l. The increase from 80 sq. ft. to 200 sq. ft, sounded like a lot, but the fact was that under existing code, they could erect wall signage that would be larger than 200 sq. ft. Wall signage is planned, but they have decided to reduce the wall signage, because they feel a free-standing sign would better meet the needs of the petitioner and the City 1n terms of aesthetics. 2. The sign is really designed for identification and retentlon of the information to people driving by on the freeway. 3. A 200 sq. ft, sign is sti]] not a large sign wb.en compared to other signs in the area. Plywood Minnesota has a larger sign at 300 sq, ft. They they had no objection to the Naegele sign coming down. This of 200 sq, ft. would not be overiy obtrusive or overly large car�pared to the other signs in the area. This is a start-up situation with a business moving in and looking to establish a sign configuration it can live with and the City can live with. They feel the granting of the variance request is going to be an aesthetically good thing for both this facility and for the area. 10L APPEALS COI�IIMISSION MEETINGs AU6UST 13, 1985 ___� � PAGE 6 Ms. Gabel asked what was the planned size for tfie wall sign. Mr. Jon Monson stated he believed it would be about 5 ft, x 18 ft. Mr. Betzold stated he thought the sign was rather °busy". k!e would not want to be looking at something this busy when driving on the freeway. Would the petitioner consider dropping the address? Mr. Monson stated the main reason they have t[Le address on the sign is because they want to provide some congruity to the site. T6ey do not expect people to read tt�e whole sign tf�e first time they drive by. It is the repetition or number of times people drive by that more of the sign will be noticed. Mr. Betzold stated tfiat if•the sign variance was approved, what was to stop the petitioner from still putting the large sign on the building as well? Mr. Ekstrum stated if the Comnission approved the sign variance, they could put on a stipulation that the wall sign be limited to what is being shown in the plan. He did not believe they would have any o6jection to that. They felt that it was more aesthetically pleasing to have a smaller sign on the wall and have a free-standing sign that would suit their purposes better and the City's purposes better. Ms. Gabel stated the Commission members really labor over these type of sign variance requests. They understand very well that every business needs a sign for identification, but there are some other problems. She stated they have worked to kind of establish a policy of discouraging tiillboards and signs that are of a billboard nature. This came through a citizen`s cartmittee that was set up through tF�e Community Development Comnission and Went through Planning Commission to City Councii. There were peopie on the committee from the Chamber of Comnerce so the business comnunity was represented, along with input from a variety of people. Ms. Gabel stated she has statistics from a rather old traffic report from MnDOT about traffic accidents along this area of the freeway, and it was horrendous. The last time she talked to MnDOT, they said the situation had only gotten worse. She stated this has been a strong consideration of the Commission's. They cannot prove signs cause accidents, but if people are driving by on the freeway and reading signs, they are obviously not paying attention to the road and traffic. Because of this concern, t�.e Comnission got caught in the middle of trying to see the businesses get what they need, yet assuming some responsibility for the pub�ic. Mr. Ekstrum stated he was very appreciative of the Commfss�.on`s concern. He stated he did not see this sign as an abuse of over-signage. He would be really concerned if someone wanted to put up a sign that was astcinq people to react in some way. He saw this sign as being something that attracts people's attention. He thought it was a necessary sign for business and one that was done with a great deal of thought and dtscussion of Nh�at was in the area and what would be appropriate to the area. 10M APPEALS COt�+IISSION MEETING, AUGUST 13, 1985 PAGE 7 Mr. Chapman stated this sign would be 2/3 the size of tbe Plywood Minnesota sign and 1/4 the size of the Naegele billboard. It was really quite a reasonable size. An 80 sq, ft. sign would not be vi.sible or readable at all, 6ecause tf�is was a distance of a6out 600 ft, at a 3�' angle from the driving path. Mr. Chapman stated there was definitely a hardship here. �hat piece of land is landlocked. When the City allowed the platting of t�e land to the west, it provided no access. Tfie only access it has is visual. It is a circumstance unique to the property. Also, the hardship is here because how e}se can they use this piece of land? Mini-storage is a use that fits and it can be done from access to the south, but they do have to have some kind of visual access to the site. Circumstances beyond the owner's control relate directly to this situation. Mr. Monson stated that beneath the Plywood Minnesota sign, it says "Exit off East River Road". He stated that same logi.c applied to their situation, and that was part of their rationale for including tEie address on the sign. Ms. Gerou suggested that the petitioner also put "Exit off East River Road" on t�e sign, eliminate the address and telephone number, and still be able to cut down on the size of the s1gn. People driving by would then know where the business was located and how to get to it. The address was meaninaless as it was not readable from the freeway. . Mr. Monson stated he would be prepared to go back and study the possibility of making the sign smaller. He thought they could live witE� 180 sq, ft. He did not think that would be a detriment to the stgn; Fwwever, he would like to have the option of either having the telephone number in larger numbers or the "Exit off East River Road". Ms. Gabel stated she felt the Appeals Comnission has been fairly consistent for a number of years, has tried to recognize that there is need and has tried to keep these things in line with what meets the needs of the comnunity and business at the same time. It was her feeling from the Commission members that 200 sq. ft, was too large. Was there some way of compromising? Mr. Monson stated they �uld lt'ke to proceed to Cit�r Council witF� the 200 sq, ft. sign, keeping the logo the same, but picking either the telephone number or the "Exit off East River Road", making the letters large enough to be read, yet would not endanger the safety of the people driving on the freeway. Ms. Gabel stated she still had a concern about tF�e size. Mr. Betzold stated he would be comfortable with the sign only saying "Minnikahda Ministorage". He felt that was all that was needed. 10N APPEALS CONIMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 13, 1985_ _ PAGE 8 l�lO2ION BY MR. BETZOLD� SECONDED BY l�lS. GEROU� 210 CLOSE TAE PUBLIC EEARING. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, GHAIRPERSQN GABEL DECLARED T8£ PUBLIC SEARING CLOSED AT 8:50 P.M. Mr. Betzold stated the sign was too busy and too large. They have had similar requests before and a lot of people want to put up signs that are visible f rom 694, so this is not a unique argument. The problem is this is still one of the busiest stretches of freeway in the state, and it is going to get worse over the next couple of years when construction beqins, People should not be looking at signs, especially signs as busy as this one is. He would recommend that, as presented, the variance request be denied. If, for whatever reason, the City Council chooses to approve this variance or approve a smaller sign, he would ask that the City Council consider limiting the wall space and limiting the information on the sign. Ms. Gerou stated the sl�jn i�s too large and it still cannot be compared to Plywood Minnesota's sign whict� is grandfathered in, Tfie Commission has turned down other large signage. This is just too busy an area for �arge signage. Ms. Gabel stated she was also concerned about the size of the sign. She felt there was a need for signage and probably a need for a variance to the sign code, but she would not like the sfgn to be tF�is large. Over the years, she has stated her reasons many many times. Her primary concern was the safety of the people on that freeway and the statistics MnDOT has documented on the accidents that occur on that section of roadway. She was reluctant to put up big signs and busy signs, and she wished they could find some methad of compromise but at this point there did not seem to be one. For those reasons, she could not vote in favor of the variance. MOTION BY MR. BETZOLD, SECONDED BY M5. GEROU� TO RECOMMEND TO CTlY COUNCIL �IAL OF THE VARIANCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTL�'R 214 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF A FREE STANDING SIGN FROM 80 SQUARE FEET TO 200 SQUARE FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF MINI5TORAGE WAREHDUSE SPACE (THREE BUILDINGS) ON A STRIP OF LAND GENERALLY ZACATED WEST OF BURLINGZION NORTHERN INC. RAILROAD TRACKS AND EAST OF THE GREAT NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL CENTER PLAT. ALL LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 22� T-30, R-24� AND IN THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 27, T-30� R-24� CITY OF FRIDLEY� COUNTY OF ANOKA. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAZRPERSON GABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIINDUSLY. Ms. Gabel stated this would go to City Council on Sept. 9. NEW Bt1SINESS: 4. CQNSIOERATIQN OF A VARIANCE REQlJEST PtiRSUANT ?O CWAPTER.�05 OF THE FRIDLEY _ � . , �. � , . . eques y. et arner, eec ree .., rt ey, n. 32} . �- � .100 QOUNCIL I�E�TING OF SEPTENBER 9. 1985 ��` 1 just Mr. Lindahl. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, asked if any utilities or easements would be shared with the property to the north. Mr. Taylor stated it is all se�rate. Mr. Burch stated they have reduved the size of the building to allaw rocm for this building to have a seFarate drivaaay. Mr. Taylor stated that was oorrect and there woulchz't be a need for a joint driveway. CAUncilman Goo�speed stated he agrees with the oatunerits by the Chai rman of the Appeals Cortmiission that ultimately scane varianoe woulci probably have to be issued for this piece � property and felt the developer has cooperated and reduoed the size af his building. 1K�TION by Gouncilman Govdspeed to grant the variance requests to build on less than 1-1/2 acres and to have a zero side yard setback on the north property lir�, with tr:e stipulation that the north wall be a four-hour rated fire wall with no ogenings. Seoonded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously . C-2. OONSIDERATION OF VARIANCES 2� INCRF�ASE MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FREE STADIDING SIGN AI�ID � ELIMINATE THE 5 F'�0'I' SETBACK BEIWEEN BUILDING A1�ID H�2D SURFACE ARF.A (MINI-SPORAGE 4,�,FtEHOUSE SPACE) . WEST OF BURLINGTON- Np�f-IERN TRACKS AI�ID EAST OF GREAT NORTHERN II�IDUSTRIAL PLAT, BY JON MONSON• N�yor Nee stated these variances would also relate to the plat and the special use permit whic� the Council held a public hearing on earlier this evening. Mr. Qureshi, City Nhnager, stated the Council could consider the varianves, when they take action on the plat and special use permit, or oonsider the varianves at this time and any action would be o�ntingent upon approval of the glat. Mr. Ekstrtun, 6401 University Avenue, stated a varianve to eliminate and five foot setback between the building and hard surf ace area was withdrawn, as it is not needed. He sta ted th e only varianoe to be oonsidered is the o�ne oonverning the free standing sic�. Mr. Burch, Assistant Public Works Director, stated the petitioner is requesting a varianoe to increase the sze af a free standing sign f ro�n 80 square feet to 200 square feet. Mr. Ekstrun stated the Appeals Commission was u�easy with this variance request, however, they reo�c�ized that a hardship existed, but wasn't in favor o� the 200 square foot si�. He stated they have now reduced the sicg� to 133 square feet and are asking for t2ie variance f rcm 80 square feet to 133 square feet. Mr. Ekstr�un stated in looking at the signage, they �onsidered a wall sign and decided they would rather put up a free standing sic� and if this was cbne, they wouldn't need the wall sign visible fran I-6 94 . - - 5 - 10P ^'� `.' 00tJNCII, MEETING OF SEPTII�ER 9. 1985 f- Mr. Ekstrun stated both Mr. Nbnson ar�cl Mr. Chagnan are present this evening to answer any questions fran �e Co�cil. Mr. Monson stated they wished to place this f ree standing sign in the Northwest a�rner af the Fxoperty, just to the east of Plywood Minnesota's property. (buncilman Barnette asked what would happen to the billboard. Mr. Monson stated Burl ington-Nor thern' s sl e� pr ope rty to then excl uded the pr ope r ty an which the billboar� is located. (btuicilman Fitzpatrick stated the Council's problen is one of setting a preoedent. Ne stated even though they have a strong argument that in an isolated plat they need this amo�t of visibility, you also have others who wish to increase their sic�s. He asked about the reductian of wall sicg►s. Mr. Nbnson stated they would be permitted a very large wall sign, if they chose to �ut one up. He sta ted th ey woul d be sa ti sf i ea, if th e v a r i ance were granted for the free standing sic�, to ha�ve no wall sign visible fran 694 and only a snaller wall sicgi on the building at the main entranoe. CAi.uzcilman Fitzpatrick asked what size wall sign they would neea. Mr. Monson stated about 6-1/2 x 18 feet or about 120 square feet. He stated it would be at the main entrance and the f ree standing sic� would be 1,000 feet to the north, right b� the freeway. NDTION by Councilman Fitz�atrick to grant the varianve to increase the size o� a f ree standing sign f ran 80 squa re f eet to 133 squa re f eet with the stipulation that the allawable wall sign be reduced fran what is now Fermitted to 120 square feet and, this varianoe is cnntingent upon approval of the plat. Sewnr3ed tr� Councilman Sch�eider. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. C-3. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE Zn RIDUCE SIDE YARD SE�BACK � ALLOW PLACEi�Tr OF TRAILER T�0 BE USID AS OFFICE AFiEA ON A TF�MPORARY BASIS. 7879 BEECH STREET. BY J. KEITfi in�1RNER: Mr. •Burch, Assistant Public Works Director, stated this is a request to temporarily place a trailer on the property an reduce the setback requirsnents. He stated this busiriess, I�ppy's Foods, is grawing rapidly and they ryeed the spaoe now and request the trailer for a three year period. Ms. Linda Har�agan, represeriting the petitioner, stated the trailer would be ptaoed on the south side � the Y�uilding. She stated they dich't iritend for it to beoane a permanent structure, but wouid serve as a tenporary solution. Mr. Qureshi, C�ty Manager, stated the Council in the Fast, has allawed the tenporary use c� trailers on large Faroels, but felt this was the first time a request was reoeived for a snaller paroel o� Froperty. He felt there was less of an imFact on the larger paroels, but a greater imp�ct to adjoining -6 - 10Q GREAT NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL CENTER EAST PLAT P.S. #�85-03 Council Action 10/7/85 Letter to be sent to person requesting plat (J. Norman?) PLAT APPROVED Stip 1. To remove existing billboard by October I990.' Note: Stip on Park Fee. It has already been paid. 0 '2, T. 30, R.P4 fR/OL EY � �.•-� � T--�' : , � �.:; t ! � � �• �� ' 41 :�... ��ti . ` � ; � I i . i : �;o�� . ,i +' ; , "' i ; -� ,: ` �;� I<�,�� AUDITORS � � �. � � �� i;_ � � , -�� 7 ;. / � � � . 14 ��n - ' ' I � i � �� I � b ,i, , ` C: . I i � � +: ` \ ,..� .� , ,.� � � : i j � �� , ��, � �..:� � . , :;�1, .. \ N0. ' �i ;+� , "��. ; � 1 � + , ,�; ' % � '� r� I I � ,t - I . _ . \ �;\a. �_,- I VAR �90—Q1 ns s. aorra•roi+ ar �,�,� a 11l1' AMi1f N � ,y�� tL7i1C 11L ,�A 1� �MMG 4►G �[ 16lO O�,�r p� �+a �+�a�s.�c.�r cw�„ L � ��l � �NY MA�� :1�AQS IKKM COM4ll+ID 33922 SUBDfVISIQN 2 .s.++ �.: � ., r .i cr �c 78 �� 10R `�' ``'--� T`''' �"' � .--''"' � I _ I • . „ .... � '^��.� --+r. �t` _ � . ;, - � . :_e�_ `� . '�" - � . �7T • � � � •y. �� +r..�..-"--...... � . _�— �---�__ +.. _ � -' �� — • ._—� �..�.+1 . e,: ?�_--- ' �� —�--� GREAT , —' " . ____ :_,- .,,: _ =1-----------_-------�� ., , ,_.. Ki � t: ' �_*�o* oo /- , a7, :: �; ,.r.,, . � 2 �� h ' _ � . ,,; � , r =�: ,� � . Q � � � ------------�r •� ` � W ,�-t-- ------ � '',.''� \ , , �� l. � � � z � / � r � N�4TH /. � I ' Q, ' '•, • y i ' ... y�' I i T ' � �« � �"••' ,` ��i I �I � .~ . � � , 1 � • I�. ., �, � , o� e �1 a � i 'I Ir�c. ` \ O J� V � ' � . I ' Y�f✓ L..yr�fM• /s � 'r � - � L � isl � �' : ! �'� , \ \ � `� . � : 1 ��,��ts V A � � T � • � � ; - � I � � S� /.4L ;t. :;;F ; � � ;f , ' 4 t ' � e"� " �� . � � \ • • . WtLOT E � �� , . �� .e, - h _ � �� i ' _ , . . 'i. • ,,; . �' ` = �.� O � o I i � r ,- �� CEN ER� . � 2 � � �� ', I � . -__� � .; .:.. � � � �- --- - -�- -- ( +n _ ��ouT�oT oo r:••� � 3 ' ;.�; � — � �' s.i jA�Nj O � Y 4 �.::. � � � �..: w :.. +:: �. , . ..�..�. «,o� ....�� ; %- ;, c ::.�. � - a. , . LOCATION MAP � �� a�fl , O r 1' • .� �� I ?p' -_� J �� R� ` _ _' — -- — — — — _ -- _ w �~ _ , . , a � . � 0 � &��v�� "i �' ' �:oo /�+so �} � � �. � f..:l �. !:�5 �wbw .. ��. <-- 694 n � VAR ��90-01 10T 1�_1.11. i3,_1 �s1 _l � 1 1 I . �"2. . � � - : -�o:iss . � ��i T _P.Yo�ri �� ^. � .� �, � N � a �� $�Ji i�+ r•t�.� �' L � �.�o/ i 3; iso� �F.E. 49�p'�P� � � I I ! ! ` ! � _ _ a �� N R � ��--i -- - ' . �� . , , n�� •- N SITE PLAN �� . �_ � 'z � '� i � � :��; � �� '�%�:��+ r '�-.�,N '� � � ,-�,'�. .� �� '�. t � 'S *' � � ��s� t �'�#� �� `��} � �• : :� . �,`�``,�; b � : , �°`' _ '`"r�� • . � i 9 �41�, fe,� ` �� ;�� • r.2 � �� .�� , +� ' �. �1 " �' �" ° �. i +- � �� d � g. }• .*�b Y�.... �'i .e,�i�'� , s�•,'T�! 'n�X'-*yY„+c' jJ wy � • .:�. 't� . Y. _ .. y,. r....�� ..i".�r'�'� '► , r �s r .: 5 r F . : > rp � j' � i . • - ' p , ♦ T � . - '.��aT...'� . ' �- r t�� ' � y '[M s �" , �A .itr'�a�'f`-C^� ' " '�"�'�;i�t�'•-''�.' �c �; - ' �s v,� y r .. y -�-"y_�� ..^h�c:�".• _.,l,.�' -..T,'•'+ s."�-_..vs �� '��,e3•i6_-• �.YF r _ ' ��1�...t�,�� _ �> � : , -�. z � � , . �+� � �n..� _s _ a " _ ►�� .r.yR�p�s�a. � �•-'��' ��S��r � � ��"7-�rP a`�S. "" �. Rii�� , f � � � - y,� } . . .y �. � i�' J.�I��r A , L � � ' - . �, a"5..� � '' ; ';�i�._s��#s.g..�j�� s . � � ,�. -: .�;a ^ � �'� �'� � ;'�",�� :_-�, _ -�:�r : ��-`�-aier': �. �-�� .s.aY _ •..� ,�gt:. . � Sa.�tiR�-.; :, . -� ;+d.�, .-�--* ` �, x_� i w `'��3r,;^'•'7r�y� �� . � ��-�i�3�`S;�n�~!4� ,a.tai�„__ - .,n _ .�` � : � � : �.,, c..�,,.� v. � .s�r�. ��' . G �, �3t� 3 �p� �,,, 'JC-r•�� •"•- ... �a ��a�� :� T '+4 � i �y j .' ,g r' . :. _ ,,,- :� .; . °�"°`� x -_ �z '� �, �s -..�, �::� � .�'+.~�� - �'�� . ' $ � �: 4" �:�= �"; �°- ' �, '� �� , � :. . �: .., �:� , ,.,. •T �� ,� ,�,: . � `�� .� � x�.��_ �� " ;'"''ti ��, �� { �:� '�,.. � ?" � �! � -.. -:! ��-' s i # '1+-sl ,�r �^,� �A_ �,'" r.: s � ;l� : .i; > . . . .y [ � . f: ' � ;�' � ... � � {s 2 • � � � � , . _ �. r .�\ y� ;� . 7 "` ' � �„Z `'+i� L . rF. : • � �i� �•� 1' . ,.. -Y'•-: . t �.',�$�F � .s`., •� ' _ 'iy�,�L � . � �a.a6p--� s�Y � • �i.F-:t;l� � �� ,�a6-y-. "f ,j � � .... . '�� +� `.A' ..v -�: � �.a" ,�? 'x'' ' . � � � T' . . �' �i •� � -�a+�,'s . ' _ -.�i.�- :,,�m;-; ' c _ �:. *. s � .� -_� �: '. � �. � �1 CITY OF FRIDLEY CATV ADVISORY COMMIBBION MEETING, JANIIARY 18, 1990 w. w. n..►w..wn �.ww.w.n.rw►w.ww.w.w.w.w..►w.r.�.w.w.w.wwwrrwww.w.ww.wrrw..w.w..►w.w.rw.w.�r...w.1r.�.w.rwr+�. w. w..�.r.r w. w. CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Stouffer called the January 18, 1990, CATV Advisory Commission meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Ralph Stouffer, Barbara Hughes, Robert Scott, Duane Peterson Burt Weaver Clyde Moravetz, City of Fridley Mark Hammerstrom, Nortel Cable David Koski, Nortel Cable Jacki & Rod Ogrezovich, 271 Rice Creek Terrace Mr. and Mrs. Ogrezovich, 272 Rice Creek Terrace, were at the � meeting to inquire about why they cannot get MSC on cable TV. Mr. Stouffer stated this is a decision made by Nortel Cable. The Commission has no control over what is on cable television. Mr. Hammerstrom stated as a cable operator, one of the key complaints they hear is in terms of rates. Over the past couple of years, Nortel has rebuilt the Fridley system which has run around $2 million. They have added new channels. They have seen increases in their programming expenses. Most of their basic services go up 5-7-10% a year. These types of things are what cause, unfortunately, the increases in basic rates. Mr. Hammerstrom stated something Nortel has a big concern about is the increase in sports programming costs. Right now ESPN is their top basic service. ESPN has made some commitments to the cable industry that it is not going to raise its rates. The problem with MSC right now is that the price for MSC as a basic service would be the highest basic service Nortel would carry. The projections for rate increases by MSC over the next 2 years is doubling. It is Nortel's feeling that there are a lot of sports fans out there and there are a lot of non-sports fans. The way sports programming is going up these days, it is one service that lends itself to being a discretionary service. Mr. Hammerstrom has said Nortel can have it as an optional service; however, MSC wants financial guarantees from the cable company to ��a CATV ADVI80RY COMMISSION MEETING JAN. 18 1990 PAGE 2 carry that service in the amount as if it were a basic service. Nortel is not willing to do that. THey feel that if MSC is out trying to secure the programming and are the ones developing this channel, then there are a certain amount of risks MSC should take, and one is taking responsibility of their channel. It is not the responsibility of the cable company or the cable customer. Mr. Hammerstrom stated there is a company through which people can get MSC, and that is the People's Choice. It is not provided by cable. It is provided by an antennae that is installed in the house, and it is rather costly. Mr. Hammerstrom stated Mr. Ogrezovich was welcome to contact him at the office if he wanted any further information. APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 19 1989, CATV ADVISORY COMMISSTON MINUTES• MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to approve the October 19, 1989, CATV Advisory Commission minutes with the following correction on page 4, paragraph 2 under Item F: "Ms. Hughes stated this is something the Company has to advise the Commission of,....". UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON STOOFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. Mr. Moravetz stated that he would like the Commission to make a motion officially approving the quarterly meeting dates which are the minimum required in the Commission Bylaws. MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to approve the following scheduled quarterly meeting dates for 1990: January 18 April 19 July 19 October 18 Meetings can be changed or special meetings scheduled at staff's discretion. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOOFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. Mr. Moravetz encouraged Commission members to give input as far as agenda items or a need to call for additional meetings. APPROVAL OF AGENDA• Mr. Moravetz stated the following items should be added to the agenda under II: 11B CATV ADVI80RY COMMISSION MEETING, JAN. 18, 1990 PAGE 3 F. Receive G. Receive H. Receive Year-to-End Report Compiled 1/9/90 1989 Statistics Year-to-End Statistical Summary Compiled 1/9/90 MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Scott, to approve the agenda as amended. IIPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOUFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. I. NORTEL CABLE REPORTS: Mr. Hammerstrom introduced Mr. David Koski, Nortel's Marketing Manager. A. Rebuild IIpdate Mr. Aammerstrom stated network is essentially adjustments. The INET will be constructed in t out" of the old system spring. Mr. Hammerstrom stated as the installation defense type override be installed some tim channels are on line. The basic channels on the rebuild of the subscriber complete, with some technical has not been constructed. That ,he spring. The actual "wreck- will also take place in the a couple of other details as far of the Com-Alert System, a civil system on the cable system, will e in the spring. Most of the new Pay-per-view has been launched. Cinemax are on. Mr. Moravetz stated that the ordinance requires a written 60 day prior notice of the rebuild completion which Nortel will be submitting within 60 days of the INET completion. Along with that, Nortel should submit another letter at the time of completion stating that the system upgrade has been completed which includes the system upgrade, plant upgrade, and installation of the emergency alert system and the 440 Mhz mid-split INET. Mr. Moravetz stated he would give Nortel a list of what has to be done through the end of 1990 as per the ordinance and sections of the ordinance that relate to the various reports. B. November/December Operations IIpdate Mr. Hammerstrom stated the subscribers are actually the big news. Subscribers at the end of 1989 were 4,727 basics, which is equivalent to 42� of the market penetrated here in Fridley and the highest it has ever been. They gained about 509 subscribers in 1989, most of whom came on at the end of the year. 11C CATD AD9I80RY COMMI88ION M�ETING, JAN. 18, 1990 PAGE 4 Mr. Hammerstrom stated they were pretty aggressive in the last quarter in terms of marketing. They participated in the commercials in November with other Twin City cable companies. They picked up about 50 customers in 2-3 days for Fridley alone through that advertising. Toys for Tots was a good campaign for them this year. Mr. Hammerstrom stated that currently they are going through a major remarket of the system. They are trying something they have never done before which is really giving the service away. They are going to customer/ non-customers who have said "no'� in the past and giving them free installation of service plus one month of basic service free, after which the sales reps will return to talk to the customers or non-customers. So far this marketing campaign is working quite well. They have 300+ sales to date, and virtually all the customers are keeping the service. Mr. Moravetz stated that at the Commission Appreciation Dinner on January 7, 1990, John Gargaro (who does of a lot of videoing of local sports events) indicated that at one point in time, there was some instant replay equipment that was available for his use in conjunction with Nortel and that equipment is now in St. Louis Park. Will this equipment stay in St. Louis Park? If so, why? Or, will it be rotated among the three communities? Mr. Hammerstrom stated he would have to find out exactly what equipment was being used at that time. He suspected that it is equipment associated with the mobile van which was re-equipped last year with a variety of different equipment. If that is the case, the mobile van has now been relocated and is being stored in the Fridley garage and is used only when needed. It is pretty much local origination equipment and would have to be used in conjunction with Jeff and other cable personnel. He stated if Mr. Gargaro wants more information, he should contact either Jeff or himself at Nortel. c• Subscriber Credits Reqardinq Converter Problems Mr. Moravetz asked Mr. Hammerstrom to explain how complaints were handled in October/November regarding the converter problems. Mr. Hammerstrom stated the equipment they had installed developed a technical glitch, which in combination with the computer programming change, wound up telling the converter boxes to look for data signals somewhere beyond any known channels. When they did that, they got high 11D CATV ADVI80RY COMMIBBION MEETING JAN. 18 1990 PAGE 5 enough at one point in the channel range and didn't hear a signal and shut off. It was a pretty major disaster. About 1, 300 boxes were replaced over a period of 4-5 days beginning Nov. 1, 1989. Mr. Haaunerstrom stated that customers had anywhere from 1 to 7 days with no service. Nortel purchased a program from their computer supply company which essentially gave them the ability to give everyone with an addressable box a global credit of 7 days of whatever service level they had. The whole thing cost about $40,000. D. Receive 4tb Quarter 1989 Franchise Fee MOTION by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. Scott, to receive the 4th Quarter 1989 Franchise fee in the amount of $18,265.74. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BTOIIFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED iJNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Moravetz asked Mr. Hammerstrom what is included under "Other Miscellaneous Deposits". Mr. Hammerstrom stated he was not sure, but would check and get that information for the Commission. Mr. Stouffer asked if it would be possible to get a sixth column that says "Total Revenues Year to Date". It will help give the Commission an idea of what Nortel is doing annually, as we11 as quarterly. Mr. Hammerstrom stated he would check with their Vice President of Finance and see if it is possible to add another column in the program. E. Annual Bubscriber 8urvey Mr. Hammerstrom stated Mr. Koski will be the person directing the survey. Mr. Hammerstrom stated the Commission members had copies of the actual survey questionnaire that went out last year, and the survey questionnaire that was done in the other two systems. He would like the Commission to review these and make any comments, suggestions, changes. Mr. Moravetz stated he believed most of the comments made by the Commissioners last year were incorporated into the final.draft of the survey. y1E CATV ADVIBORY COMMISSION I�ETZNG, JAN. 18. 1990 PAGE 6 Mr. Hammerstrom stated that was his understanding also, particularly in the latter questions where there were ratings between excellent to poor and they needed reasons specifically why they were unsatisfactory or poor as opposed to just general comments. Mr. Hammerstrom stated that last year the survey was sent to a 10� sample of residents in Fridley. What they did in the other two cities was to send a survey to every customer and every tenth survey that has been produced by the printer has been colorcoded with a business reply with return postage back to the advertising company that does the analysis and produces the reports. Then that became the random sample they used, for example, last year in this survey. The rest of the surveys that were not colorcoded were received in the Nortel office and they corrected any problems or complaints through a very informal tally to see if they are tracking along with the results from the ad agency. The PR value is there because it is hard to get the response from everyone, and it gives those people who want to say something the opportunity to do so. By having those surveys come back to Nortel directly, they can take care of those problems immediately. Mr. Hammerstrom stated the survey format for Fridley and the one far Bloomington and St. Louis Park are very similar. Mr. Stouffer asked if Nortel was going to put in a disclaimer under "Repair and Technical Services" to ask customers to disregard the week of the conversion. Nortel knows they had problems, and they need to know what problems there are when they are operating normally, not when there is a major glitch. Mr. Hammerstrom stated that is a very good idea. Ms. Hughes stated if they could have people start with January 1, that would get them out of the time of the conversion when there were so many problems. Mr. Moravetz stated the annual survey is due to be conducted by March according to the franchise. He stated that under the circumstances, they could deviate from the franchise requirements of the time frames. MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to allow Nortel Cable to deviate from the franchise requirements and to extend the period for the annual subscriber survey to the end of the first quarter 1990; a report of the CATV l�DVI80RY COI+II+II88ION l�t$$TING. Jl�T. 18, 1990 PAGE 7 survey to be submitted to the CATV Advisory Commission no later than the July 1990 meetinq. IIPON A VOICB VOTB, AI�L VOTING AYB, CHllIRPBRBON BTOIIFFER D$CL1�R$D THE 1�IOTION CARRZBD ONl�NIMOOSLY. Mr. Stouffer suggested an additional number to describe subscriber interest on the April 1989 survey forn► under #2 at the bottom of the first page: 1 - very interested 2 - interested 3 - somewhat interested 4 - not interested Mr. Hammerstrom stated he had no problem with that change. " Mr. Stouffer asked if the survey would ask customers about "pay-per-view" specifically since it is a new item. Mr. Hammerstrom stated they will probably add a couple of questions about pay-per-view. Mr. Moravetz stated maybe there should be some questions about pay-per-view and the tuxedo service where if someone has a cable-ready TV set, although the video is scrambled, the audio is not. Maybe they can get some input from the subscribers. Mr. Moravetz asked if the Commission members�wanted to see a copy of the survey before it is mailed out. Mr. Stouffer stated he did not think it was necessary since the suggestions for changes are minor. Mr. Hammerstrom stated that if there is time, he will send copies to the Commission members. II. ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOP: A. Receive Letter from ACCW Chairman Addressed to Nortel Kanaqer dated 11/1/89: MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to receive the letter from ACCW Chairman to Nortel Manager dated il/1/89. DPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON BTOIIFFER DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. H. Receive Beptember/October/November Statfstics 11F 11G CATV ADDISORY COMMISSION MEETING JAN. 18 1990 PAGE 8 MO ION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to receive the September/October/November 1989 Statistics. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERBON BTOIIFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED tTNANIMOOBLY. C. Receive Letter from Director Dated 11/6/89: MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to receive the letter from the Director dated 11/6/89. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CBAIRPERSON BTOIIFFER DECLARED T$E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISI�Y. MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Scott, to compliment ETC-33 staff for their activities and performance. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CiiAIRPER80N STOOFFER DECI�ARED T$E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. D. Receive December 1989 Director�s Report Dated 1/3/90: MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Ms. Hughes, to receive the December 1989 Director's Report dated 1/3/90. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOUFFER DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY. E. Receive 4th Quarter Report to the City Dated i/4/90: MOTION by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. Scott, to receive the 4th Quarter Report to the City dated 1/4/90. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CIiAIRPER80N STOIIFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. F. Receive Year-to-End Report 1989, Compiled 1/9/90 MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to receive the Year-to-End Report 1989. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOOFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. G. Receive 1989 8tatistiCs MOTION by Mr. Peterson, seconded by Mr. Scott, to receive the 1989 Statistics. CATD ADDIBORY COMMI88ION MEETING JAN. t8 1990 PAGE 9 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON BTOIIFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMODSLY. H. Reaeive Year-to-End Statistics 8ummary 1989, Compiled 1/9/90 MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Peterson, to receive the Year-to-End Statistics Summary 1989. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOIIFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED LTNANIMOIISLY. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Ms. Hughes, seconded by Mr. Scott, to adjourn the meeting. IIpon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Chairperson Btouffer declared the January 18, 1990, CATV Advisory Commission meetinq adjourned at 8:�5 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �' r� v. � Lynn Saba Recording Secretary 11H � � cinroF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: C011/LMUNIT'y DEVELOPMEI�T DEPARTMENT' MEMORANDUM February 8, 1990 �,� William Burns, City Manager dj• Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Approving a Lot Split, L.S. #89-01, by Mark and Pamela Nyberg At the April 5, 1989 meeting, the Planning Commission approved the lot split request for 1501 Rice Creek Road N.E., subject to four stipulations: 1. The certificate of survey shall indicate a suitable building elevation for connection to the City sewer. The elevation shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. 4. The driveway location must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. The petitioner shall execute appropriate utility easements as requested by the City or by the cable TV company. At the request of the petitioner, action on this request by the City Council was postponed, pending the petitioners� divorce. The petitioner has submitted a certificate of survey, and now requests that the City Council take action on this lot split. The stipulations recommended by the Planning Commission address any environmental concerns that may be raised by the neighbors. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the resolution authorizing the lot split request, L.S. #89-01. NII�i/dn M-90-82 12 � � STAFF APPEALS DATE REPORT CIN OF PLANNNG COMWSSION DATE r�arch 22 , 19 89 f RI DLEY CRY COI�ICIL DATE Apr il 5, 1989 �� /ls April 17, 1989 SB REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES 8� ZONING UTllTIES PARK DEDtCATiON ANALYSIS FlNANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBtLITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMtSSION RECOMMENDATION 12A 12B Staff Report L.S. #$9-01 Page 2 . REQUEST The petitioners, Mark and Pamela Nyberg, are proposing to split off the north 151 feet of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, the same being 1501 Rice Creek Road, to create a separate parcel for a single family dwelling. This property is located in an R-1 (single family residential) zoning district. The petitioners intend to sell the south lot (which contains the existing house) and build their new residence on the resulting north parcel. SITE The lot in question is 36,696 sq. ft. and has double frontage with Rice Creek Road on the south and Camelot Lane on the north. Arthur Street has been vacated west of this property, and large residential lots (37,500 sq. ft. each) are west of the site in the Spring Valley Addition. Smaller single family lots are located east of the petitioners' land in Harris Lake Estates. The present house is on the south portion of the existing lot with a setback of 44 feet from Rice Creek Road. An in-ground swimming pool is located on the north part of the lot. ANALYSIS The proposal would divide this property into separate parcels totalling 19,932 sq. ft. (north lot) and 16,764 sq. ft. (south lot). Both of these exceed the 9,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size required for a single family dwelling unit. In addition, each parcel would be considerably larger than the lots located directly to the east, which are all under 11,000 sq. ft. in size. There are some issues which must be addressed before construction of a single family dwelling in the resulting north parcel. City water is available on the north and west sides of the lot, and sewer is available on the north side. However, because the property is at a lower elevation than the street, additional fill may be needed to accomplish a sewer hook-up at an appropriate elevation. The certificate of survey accompanying the building permit should indicate an appropriate building elevation for connection to city sewer. In addition, the site, because of its low elevation, has received the run-off from adjacent properties. A grading and drainage plan should be submitted with the building permit application to properly address the new drainage patterns. Finally, driveway access should be carefully considered since numerous mature trees currently provide excellent screening along Camelot Lane and access from the northwest corner is restricted by the curve where Arthur Street intersects Camelot Lane. All of these points should be resolved prior to issuance of the building permit for new home construction on this site. Staff Report L.S. #89-01 Page 3 12C Nortel Cable TV has indicated a need for an easement. At the time af the writing of this report, they had not defined the location or width of the easement. A stipulation to grant an easement for this purpose is recommended. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of L.S. #89-01 allowing the requested lot split for 1501 Rice Creek Road N.E. with the following stipulations: 1. The certificate of survey shall indicate a suitable building elevation for connection to the city sewer. The elevation shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The driveway �ocation must be approved by the Public � Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The petitioner shall execute appropriate utility easements as requested by the City or by the Cable TV company. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission approved the lot split request, L.S. #89- O1, Mark and Pamela Nyberg, with the four stipulations recoinmended by staff. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the lot split request, L.S. #89-01, Mark and Pamela Nyberg, with the four stipulations recommended by staff. 12D CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING CO1+II��ISSION MEETING, �PRIL 5� 1989 ------------------------------------------------------------.1-- CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Betzold called the April 5, 1989, Plan ' g Commission meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Donald Betzold, Dave Ko rick, Dean Saba, Susan Sherek, Alex Ba a Members Absent: Paul Dahlberg Others Present: Barbara Dacy, anning Coordinator Jock Roberts , Community Development Director Michele McP erson, Landscape Intern Mark Nybe g, 1501 Rice Creek Road Todd No tsky, 6211 Carol Drive N.E. Sandy oskiniemi, 881 Pandora Drive N.E. Nan Hoel, 11945 Unity Circle, Coon Rapids MOTION by Mr. ondrick, seconded by Mr. Barna, to approve the March 22, 1989, P nning Commission minutes with the following amendment: Page 6, paragraph 4, second sentence should read as follows: "T City Council would not like to see the Planning mmission go to five members." UP9i�i A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE M{fTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY l�ND THE MINIITES APPROVED AS AMENDED. 1. TABLED 3/22/89: CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #89-01, BY MARK AND PAMELA NYBERG: To split off the north 151 feet of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, to create a separate parcel for a single family house, the same being 1501 Rice Creek Road N.E. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to remove the item from the table. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 12E PLANNING COMKIBBION 1�EETING. �PRIL S. 1989 PAGE 2 Ms. Dacy stated this property is located on the north side of Rice Creek Road. The property is zoned R-1, single family. l�n existing home is located on the southern portion of the parcel at this time, and the app2icant is proposing to split the lot with an east/west lot line to create another building pad to the north. Ms. Dacy stated staff has no concerns about this lot split; however, she would point out that the elevation of the property is lower than the street. There will be the necessity for some filling in order to get a building elevation pad so there can be a connection to city sewer. Also, staff has recommended that in conjunction with the building permit application, the driveway location be reviewed by the Public Works Department. There is a curve in the northwest corner of the property and there is a stand of very tall evergreen trees to the east, and they want to make sure there is adequate sight distance and a good intersection with the street. Ms. Dacy stated Nortel Cable Company had notified staff that they might need an easement, but they have not been able to define an exact location at this time. So, staff is recommending that the petitioner execute a utility easement as necessary by the cable company. Ms. Dacy stated this property has been assessed on the basis of two lots. That should not influence the Commission's decision one way or the other, because the land use and the zoning issues are to be considered separately from the assessment issue. Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of this lot split subject to the following stipulations: 1. The certificate of survey shall indicate a suitable building elevation for connection to the city sewer. The elevation shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted with the bui2ding permit application for approval by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. 4. The driveway location must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. The petitioner shall execute appropriate utility easements as requested by the City or by the cable TV company. Mr. Kondrick asked if the new lot had the required square footage. 12F PLANNING COMMISSION MEBTINa. �PRIL 5. 1989 PAGE 3 Ms. Dacy stated it had. In fact, the lot is almost twice the size as the lots to the northeast of the property. Mr. Betzold asked Mr. Nyberg if he had any problems with the stipulations as presented by staff. Mr. Nyberg stated he did not have any problems with the stipulations. He stated he realizes he will need some fill in order to hook up with city sewer. Mr. Betzold asked if Mr. Nyberg would be able to save some of the trees on the lot. Mr. Nyberg stated he plans to put the driveway where the tall stand of trees is on the east side. There are about 30 trees along there. He does not need a double width driveway so he might take down two trees. He wants to save as many trees as possible. Ms. Sherek stated she thought the City's concern is traffic safety and so more trees might have to be removed for proper visibility. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City Council approval of Lot Split, L.S. #89-01, by Pamela and Mark Nyberg to split off the north 151 feet of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, to create a separate parcel for a single family house, the same being 1501 Rice Creek Road N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The certificate of survey shall indicate a suitable building elevation for connection to the city sewer. The elevation shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The driveway location must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The petitioner shall execute appropriate utility easements as requested by the City or by the cable TV company. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Betzold stated this item will go to City Council on Monday, April I7. RESOLUTION NO. - 1990 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVTSION, LOT SPLIT, L.S. #89-01, TO SPLIT OFF THE SOUTH 122 FEET OF LOT 4, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 22, TO CREATE A SEPARATE PARCEL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1501 RICE CREEK ROAD N.E. 12G WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the , 1990 meeting; and the Planning Commission stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, such approval was to split off the south 122 feet of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, to create a separate parcel for a single family house, generally located at 1501 Rice Creek Road N.E. The legal descriptions for the two properties are as follows: Parcel A: The south 122.00 feet of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, Anoka County, Minnesota. Parcel B: Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22, Anoka County, Minnesota, except the south 122.00 feet thereof. WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from the owner; and WHEREAS, such approval will create two separate parcels from Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 22. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPLA - CITY CLERK WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR EXHIBIT A 12H Resolution No. - 1990 1. The certificate of survey shall indicate a suitable building elevation for connection to the city sewer. The elevation shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The driveway location must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. The petitioner shall execute appropriate utility easements as requested by the City or by the Cable TV company. : /3. T 30. I �. 24 �F FR/OL EY L.S. 4�89-01 Mark Nyberg 121 TM1515 � COwVIIATqN pf f: iMEI' A►/EA� �H iME AHO�.s OfFKES AfFFC1wG TNE �+E� iN15 DRAM9NG �S !O!E u5f: RffERENCE N1R►OSES �Np " TY IS NOi RESrONSIlIE f; : ACCURACIES MEREtN CJN 539/3 ' 14 �� -� 4� 41 �`�'� I l � UL� UU t_,�_l --�== - �� ----�..o - - ,, r , ,, .., , ,.. ,, t �o'� td �s� ai ai ro �p ��,� nI^ ''� 1�� j�l t+ � �t �i i = 1A : �r a r, ., i ��.., N�� . �i � • /3 ii 9 7 ,j ;j �"' I tNr` � ��rr. j a i �� a.+..�,. r�... @°rr F' � % �a . �+ s s �e �� N �a �'� �: L�^ :•M, � � ,�, R y, i - . � ', IN lf� fA U�1 � n) ei l�r � Wpi �' p. %�,�� .r �.i�q /9 l� " �� ,/+ �..'.R. o..i � 2 ' ' " _ _ � i� i� . � d ,_. .� 4 � . ' � d < < � ��< <; a- .--�, 43 � ROlAND W. ANOERSO� 24;' COUNiI' SURVFYCR �ww� cprnr .wrsorr � O LOCATION MAP L.S. ��89-01 Mark Nyberg 12J ZONlNG MAP CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: MARK NYBERG �2K � �� - � n � u no no r'�'��`��.�� . �_--- � - � -- —�..r' �.,� ,„� 0 � 0 � 33 � h � N - 130.96 - h CAMELOT �22'p5 N� 91 � .- o s - x � � ` ,� �. 7■ �'O �. ..: M , i.. . � , l� �I � � , LANE N.E. - ' I`� V t�i.INil� �, . � � . �—� � o Q � 9 � --� _-r---- r �'? - ao I� `� - � , �� ', �O . � N (`�' . * o G in - i �++ Q`' � _ � W QP • � x � . . � � -° �, � '� � �� ^ F� � x ��., x A ao I N ,; �r. -'°' - a� �_,—. -� � ' N 1b.5-. , � � . ' = 130.93 I� _.. . ti.. �„ 9� ��` 8 , Q o _ �„� �. 9 P � = O ' e , •) 1 j� Tr� N - h � . 3 _ ��e c i .• •' N , N � c7 S z _ .-,`:,'�' 7s] •- O ��r,[_,Q'Hr_r.�� r�.'.�. r'1��`= N �.z �'74.� �;..�.. ryw , �o � � r 3 . � �� J 2 � : `., �y�� /� t y � � ' _�. O �v � ' iQ, tJ 'r ' �n �'� 9J '� 1 v e m 9' P / ? 3 3 QQ � , Oo . y t�0� ' % ' �< < 130.91 0 � CSAH No.6 RICE CREEK ROAD o � � �. i ,, ,., , , ,, � :, ��. � ., 1� \�;�i,i��r� tiul��ti'.��'.i��n � � ._. '�.t�,^i-:� �,�uii�: . `lii,!.• - • . i i,.�:,,�,.�i I'•�,.��I A: "11�..• .,>u'i�� ._�.uu f��r•t c�l L�� .. '��i�1it,.�� Sul��i�c�.��h '.� . _.. .. � F.�� • u�„ � �t�nnv��t�. � .. �_,_. { t .�. . j I��; . ,. i . \�� .. .r • >��1„i � . � 5 ,,,i�. , . .... .i. i_� �.��t � . . �, i i�.� - ' . . � � I� - i' !, 1 . , . , � 1 � ' � r . . .. i � .� � �� ., • ,. .. ,. - � . .. ...{ . �� . , 6��r��i. .,r.' . 'Lt�? tl��s s:, . . �-�,.. .. r�•y��rt �ns t,:�Fpnrad t,y .� � r ��.'.•,r m�.�Id:rr-.�� upr,�c�.*� �r� nr,�:�tt��e! I wm a dul>� lirenc�.rl i.•u„i ..�:r�.r�„�.r ur�JFr the Le�.s �'n� S:n•�� .,f .�inr.rc.,��.. ,�:. . �i,. 24�-i�,. �r �^�`'ac�-- ��.r.. �v!'. . y..,;• E�,<��,�.�,��<, s��w�•� w.,i�� F�,,�k� sv��•�,, M.,�n,cn,i�,c� MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�,�► PW90-54 FROM: John G. F1ora,rPublic Works Director DATE: February 8, 1990 SIIBJECT: Water Conservation Program Attached is a resolution regarding the Water Conservation Program for the summer of 1990 as discussed with the Council at their Conference Meeting last month. With the recent two-year drought and the apparent extension into 1990, plus the placement of two of our major producing wells into an emergency standby position, it appears that we may not be able to satisfy this summer water demands. Lawn sprinkling is a major summer demand that severely impacts our water production, therefore, it appears necessary that we implement a lawn sprinkling ban for this summer and notify our residents as soon as possible. The resolution, according to Fridley Ordinance No. 402, establishes a lawn sprinkling/watering ban dailv during the period 12:00 p.m. (noon) to 8:00 p.m. The resolution also indicates that this conservation program could be amended or terminated dependinc�"the summer conditions. Recommend the City Council approve the Water Conservation Resolution. JGF/ts Attachment 13 �- �-- ., � • R$SOLIITION NO. - 1990 !1 R$SOLDTiON ESTl1BLIB8INC3 !� 11l�TBR CONBBRVATION PROQRlilM FOR T8L BIIMIri$R OF 19 9 0 11HERBAB, Fridley Ordinance Chapter 402, Water and Sewer Conservation establishes the procedure for a Water Conservation resolution, and lI8ER8lr8, the metropolitan area has been under a drought condition for two (2) consecutive years, and IISER8A8, this winter indicates the drought effects will continue into 2990, and liBERSAS, the City has a limited well production capacity, and 1IHSR8A8, this summer's moisture conditions cannot be determined at this time, and IIHEREAB, lawn sprinkling is a major water user. NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RE80LVED, by the City Council of the City of Fridley that a Water Conservation Program is established for the period of April 15, 1990, extending through SepteYaber 15, 1990, and HE IT FIIRTHBR RSSOLVBD, that during this period that a daily lawn sprinkling ban is effective for the hours of 12:00 p.m. (noon) to 8:00 p.m., and H8 IT FIIRTHER RESOL9SD, that this Water Conservation Program may be amended or terminated as the summer conditions are experienced. PA88SD AND ADOPTED BY THS CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBROARY, 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK � �3A TO: FROM: DATE: E�,y��,��< <��,�, s�w�� w,,t�� .�rh:, S�r�•uts M.,,�,i��,,��,� � MEMORANDUM �� , William W. Burns, City Managerr�,� PW90-35 John G. Flora, Public Works Director Ralph Volkman, Superintendent of Public Works February 8, 1990 SIIBJECT: Advertisement for Requesting Bids for (2) Park Maintenance Tractors The 1990 Public Works Budget has identified and approved funds to purchase two park maintenance tractors with accessories. The budget has $44,000.00 appropriated for the two tractors. Two existing Ford Tractors (1980 and 1981) will be traded in on the new tractors. The total bids should be within the appropriated � budget amount. Recommend the City Council approve the resolution to advertise for bid� for the two park maintenance tractors. Attached are the specifications for the tractors. If you need additional information, please let me know. JGF/RV/ts Attachment ca -n �14 .o .. v T-- i- • i�_� RESOLIITION NO. - 1990 RESOLIITION TO �DVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR TIPO (2) 2-A8E$L DRIVE DIESEL TRACTORS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley as follows: 1. That it is in the interest of the City to award bid contracts for the following items or materials: TWO (2j 2-11HE$L DRIVE DIESEL TRACTORS 2. A copy of the specifications for the above-described items and materials, together with a proposal for the method of purchase and the payment thereof have been presented to the Council by the City Manager and the same are hereby approved and adopted as the plans and specifications, and the method of acquisition and payment to be required by the City with respect to the acquisition of said items and materials. 3. The purchase of said items and materials as described above shall be effected by sealed bids to be received and opened by the City of Fridley on the 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990. The City Manager is directed and authorized to advertise for the purchase of said items and materials by sealed bid proposals under notice as provided by law and the Charter of the City of FridZey, the notice to be substantially in form as that shown by Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of by reference. Said notice shall be published at least twice in the official newspaper of the City of Fridley. PASSED AND ADOPTBD HY THE CITY COiTNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRIIARY, 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 14A � N � : ��.� .��A � i �� .� � � � � `' �.'A Sealed bids will be r�oeived ar�d publicly ope�ned �ry the City of Fridley, Anoka Cb�mty, Mirn�esata, at the offioe of the Public Works DirecGor, 643i University Av�ntle N.E., Fridley, Mi.1'u�e5o�t8 55432 (Tel. 571-3450), o�n Wednesd�y, the 7th day of M�, 1990, at 11:00 a.m., far the furnishing of (2) 2-f�eel D�ive Diesel TYBCt,or's . All in aaoamdanae with specifications p�ep�r�d by John G. Flara, P.E., Public Works Direct�or, Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E. , Fridley, Mn 55432 (Tel. 571-3450). Specificatior�s may be exaan�ined at the offioe of the Public Wb�ks Direc�tor at�d c�opies may be obtained for the In�l�aent Dealer's ir�dividual use by app1Y�9 � th� Public Works DirectAr. Bids must be made oa� the basis of ca.sh payment for mac�ines, and aooanpanied bY a ca.sh deposit, oertified check (aaz a raspaa�.sible bank in the State of Mirn�esata) or a bic�der's bond made gayable without oondition t:o Gity of FYidley, l�T, in an amaunt of nat less than (5�) per oent of the t�tal amo�rrt of the bid. 'i2ie City oo�uzcil reserves the right ta reject ariy and all bids at�d to waive arty informalities in ar�y bids Y�eaeived without earplanation. No bid may be witix3rawn for a period of thiYty (30) days. By order of the City C�au�cil of the City of Fridley, Minn�sat.a. Drated the 12th clay of Feb�vary, 1990. Jo�t�n G. Flora, P.E. PUBLIC W�2K5 DIRDCI�2 Published.• Fridlev Pbcu.s F'eknv�ar"y 16, 1990 F�'y 23, 1990 Marc�h 2, 1990 I � �J MEMORANDUM � TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �^�� PW90-56 FROM: John G. Flor�, Public Works Director DATE: February 8, 1990 BIIBJECT: Corridor Maintenance Project No. 199 Attached is a resolution authorizing the advertisement for bids for the University Avenue corridor maintenance. This work was completed by contract last year for $36,700.00. Recommend the City Council authorize the advertisement for this work in 1990. JGF/ts Attachment 15 ��— �, � • I�8p7�T1'IQ�i I�. - 1990 ''_ = • � • • •�� .i• � c � i. . � � _ �: • � . •i � •.•�� :�• i � • :�•� -1: I: ' �" : 1�; •�','1' �� :' r � :i� i. M: Y�_� �.� � L� 1�8, the �.stnictio� of oertain inQ�vemerrts is d�eeqned tA be in the irYterest of the City of Fridley ar�d the prope.rty v�ar�ers affected the,reby. �71I, �, BE IT R�OLVED by the City Camcil of tYye City of FYidley, At�oka OauYty, Minnesata as follaas: l. Z�at the follvwir�g i�rovea�.nts Pra�o�ed by t7auyci.l 1ae'".�oluti�s are i�ereby oYde,red to be effected ar�d oa�let�ed as required: ��;�; ��;; r� ��Y.,�r �w: i•• - � .� i 2. Zhe plans azxi snecifications prepared by the Public Wbrks Dire�ctor for � inQroveqae,rits are hereby approved ar�d shall be filed with the City Clerk. Zhe Public W�orks Director shall aocordirgly prepare and cause to be insext.ed in the official newspaper adverti.se�nerits for bids uq�oa� tl�e making of such inQmve�nents urr�er suc�i approved plans ar�d s�ecificatio�s. The advertise�ment shall be publist�ed for three (s) w�eeks (at least 2� days), and shall specify the w�rk to be cic�e ar�d will state that the bids wilz be c�er�e�d ar�d c��sidered at 11:00 a.m. o� the 20th day oi March, 1990, azxi that no bids will be ooa�siderad unless sealed and filed with the Public Works Direct�or. Zt�at the advertise�ne�nt for bids for �ZDO�t 1+�1N1'E1�4� PiiO►7EC.T 1�1�. 199 shall be substantially in ti�e star�dan�i farm. :�:1:r� �� • • :++� �:1' M •� 11 M� •I' �:1: M •1' ' �� :� � L: �'� •1" :�•�•.Ir. y • � WIIZIAM J. NEE - 1�Y� ATI'F�'T: �- r • - • « M �- 15A .�1 M a: ,� � i �—``:i •� 3 ••�•�• ��:• r- � �:^ ' M: •• - Sealed bids will be reoeived ar�d publicly c�peex�ed by the City of Fridley, Anoka Oamty, Miru�e�..�ota, at the offioe of the Public Works Director, 6431 University Avetnye N.E., Fridley, Minnesata 55432 (Z�e1. 571-3450) ori the 20th day of March, 1990, at 11: 00 a.m. , for ti�e furnishit�g of taork and materials for ��O�t iII�II�TI'ffi�t�� PiiJJBGT �199. 57 Acres Mowit�q, tri�inq arid o�ti�r maint�ria�e as snecified. All in a000rdarx�e with plans ar�d snecificatioa�s pr�ared by Jd�uz G. Flora, P.E. , Public Works Direct�or, Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Avem�e N.E., Fridley, i�d 55432 (T1e7.. 572-3550) . Plans ar�d specifications may be examined at the offioe of the Public Works Director arid c�apies may be abtair�ed for the �tractor's i.ndividual use by applyir�g to the Public Works Direckor. Bids must be mac�e ari the basis of cash payment for w�rk, arid aooampanied by a cash deposit, oertified ci�k (on a resp�sible bank in the State of Minnesata) or a bidd�r's boa�d made payable witibout c�itio� to the City of �idley, 1�T, in an amwnt of not less thar► five (5�) per oent of the tatal aim�unt of tiye bid. Zhe City reserves the riqht to reject arYy ar�d all bids ar�d to waive ariy infonmalities in any bids reoeived withaut explanatioaz. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of forty-five (45) days. By on�ex of ti�e City Qau�cil of the City of Fridley, Minnesata. Dated the 12th day of FebYVary, 1990. Published: FYidley Focus Febn�aYy 28, 1990 Mamh 7, 1990 March 14, 1990 Jahn G. Flora, P.E. PUBLIC Wl'7�2KS D� O�nstruction Hulletin Marc31 2, 1990 MarGh 9, 1990 Mardl 16, 1990 15B _ _ _ __ _ ___ ___ . , . ,� . , . . • � . • �� J�t ••:� ,,, 'fT F�'—•—'��-�� IT`/ Of FRIOLE7 � � �� ' .s��' w• �r�• ...�r•• � " '.� .; ti VOTtHG SGIOOI ; ;-` � . :j�-i ' ••••••••�"r� OISTR�CTS � ORSTfiCTS �::'r;�+' •�: s.. � � �„�, . �1 •'�� '�✓� a,�,±l�%i.:'� ...�.� M� �.�� \ .t • �.Jlr� `��,�,� �/�� , `` � �`. .. . �l,•.. Ii��.i�.� x _.�. � »�:T _�.. . �.. : �NORTH OF OSBORNE' ; T ~ "� `"" � I, �� —� � V�..��_.r � ,�,. MEDIAN b WEST SIDE ONLY � � - ,_�• •• ` �= � " ;L, - ��"' �,L. � -,C' ��"�' 'rr. '' _.� �'� - _ _ _ ,`. � � . 1.�� /l j _ .r-�'�_ �� ... �~ J (`�:_��_■ � 1 y � � r'1 J _ � \ i ; , \ i ' - ._.._. .. M _ _. �� .vi `.f .{ ,1� I.�. . �� '.,�.,� -� � , f � � _, _ _ ..... _ � � -�.3 iT�r=T— ;..` .. ,: ' . _ _.. ... ...�... - • � y �� ►— ..,� •�'�".,F`;; i-, j� � I� �� ( `� � ;� ^f;� ` .. '.i_ � ��': r�. ♦ ��._ �i.::.� ;• �•.. �• . IIf i .a. ... � �...� •'� `! �:�' i�"';. :-?� � _� - � UNIVERSITY AVE. MEDIAN INCLUDED sM�`;R�i, \. •. � _. ., �� _: . �^ �-�.,_. u t•1: � � �• Ii� :� i ._ � r,,c �, ��._S.- -=n�' �' T'^�*+s"i.r . lr-- i r�—� ?tc,1.m�..s.-..-- , .�-�. . �d,� �� '� ��•. � _�, ' � i.^ I � —' '- --. _; _��'_ CENTER MEDIAN�� • ' �- r�:� =:r = '�.__ �'I---- -- �-��_' �� 1-w. '�r .7 _�! _. � , j —''. I I�._ -. .'_ �' t�� .1 �_ INCLUDED �� ' -� -=� � ' __ - .� ' ' I �_� .. , i � _ �� , ✓; ��._ �.-, ' — ' —•- -;i ��-� i N � � , �'�` ' _` t � '°� - -- -- =i �, � _ � ; � ' - � -- �-�-' � ��. � . -�- � ! , � '.—� -ii _ ' � 1 / ! _- __J'r-';...- __ i _ ' -� _;`, w �� ; E � �::;:�°�":�; ..... r�' - _- :; _ _\ ` _ �� [ .�,... .'` ! � ', �k =� `, I; _ _t___. �a�,�;� i '"'��.��,�.,'r � � ' E' ' ` — = _ --'� �- .. _. .__. ; �,��- -f � `��;-_ j- ' S ; ^i� ::r.-�-�-;Y - _T -- :--,�--.:-� ^-__.:_�, �� : i: �.,.-. �'`'''- � NOTE: HIGHWAY FENCE ENDS AT 69TH AVE. _ �i._,,-.�;,�-.- 1 ^ . ^ 1 J �'�, y, • - , , : � � � : •..;� . - �— �� , - -. � J��. ,, ,,�- �-.:' ��'' _ � h,��.' ��_ a---, � 'ji , } � I �`. ` �` �' �"'' % , -^� __"y.`��v � ,� . ;-, " �C � ,, c �;, � � �: � J,F "' -'� �� ''° ' �-� .� ° � CUTTING REQUIRED ON �' .-;i' �� • � ��'�/ ��J(��- •�---° �� !'�� BOTH SIDES OF FENCE �'��~ � '��`i / \ . �' • ��.1'� .y � � ! 1 +� 1�, ! ��I I �. � � . I ` � �/��..'r�l �� \'�-; �If�- ��-�/ _y� I '-�.� T- _ 11 �I�1'1' — — — —. — , \ � •�% -�,�.t a . `"' y� -� �_� �` r �f' `—. ^_�- ( r °" ^r __ ..._ i , , ��, � �,:, --- � - =,._.Tf �� I r._ � �� _ I't u � I � s _; _ t'�7-'-�' T, � I t r _ `� ; j�� 1�..�� `_J— � -- �.I��±'^�`L� �c I i�;( j' �I { 1��,�� f -1 . ;�. - .t, �, _ � ; .� �E �, :, i.� {� , �� i , 1� l,� � � , � °`.�-- � CENTER MEDIAN _"' ��i�. _ -_ � --� .t_ .�_ n� �; �,�_'C�`�,,�, T�` � � � � ^ >-_-:=`, � � I - � �' � �-1 �% !I i�� :' I . �Y,,� . - �)�"` ( i INCLUDED � _- " -- ' • _ ,.. , _=:1 _,. � c%� i ;� t 1 -- SLIP OFF - '°-:: �_:: ':�'�'� = r� '� �" � �" �� — INCLUDED _ : 5 �;_ �:<: _.. , � I . , K ' '°`'•` J ;c�°.,• ,� � � � ,, � 'r '" �=?�' i � � �i U'J _'r`-':_ _�-�-= f �K�:. � `.'� 'U , • �,• � r � Yoo�E ` ~/`� � o �' ' __ �� . �.__ ,'; ' r:r�' r- � .� �, / �- �s. �� 1 ''��' 0� �►[� .��:� `—� , I -- �.I =},a,2� � / .c�o"' � '.r . � T G�� f ::� YT'��z;� > � .�,� _ '�1.� �� i =` ( 'I=_s,,",�� / iy '•� �� I � � � :1:' ._ ; � _ J � CUTTING RE(iUIRED ON j n °� k�. .. , _ ; , �, / _ - -� ,; � �N = .� _ l,� J . �� _ BOTH SIDES OF FENCE ��'0 ;`' � � � I W Y= a 1 ��= �� y' — -- �� i -u„i-� I _ - � °~, � /•'�� _ �� _ _� i , � � _ a��: � � , � � �� _- �-�•• PROJECT # 199 �` i ! � � ............. _ _ I �`� -_ �_' � �.l.w__ ....�n.... � w-. « ' ' �� .. � �'..3'.ti�• " ! . '. � �� r� � � ` �`�\ `� � a7 S� � � '« '� «� \� '�• _._ " � '�' r .y_r s = �''�\� ' m�� --- � -- � ��a _— _ �U��r o. , � : JN " `, � �. �'�.. — N ��\\ _ � � � �' f� : - ' - \ •) i�� '- ='� ' -- �"- -' a C - � _ �..• ..� �� . « �"" � _ _ _ � �-. - --_ � a; . ' �- � _ � �= _.. ......: « -ti. r_ - � = " _. � �.. c � ~ - _ .. , � -_ ...._ .o.es. _ E�,�,�„�<��,�a Sev.i r Weic r P�irk�. Strcetti M.+�ntendnce MEMC�RANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �r� � PW90-55 FROM: John G. Flora; Public Works Director DATE: February 8, 1990 BIIBJECT: Repair and Maintenance of Well No. 3 Project No. 203 Attached is a resolution advertising for the repair and upgrade of Well No. 3. This is the well that we discussed with the Council at their Conference Meeting regarding the lowering of the pump another 50 feet in order to allow it to be put back on line for this summer's water production. JGF/ts Attachment 16 .�_ � �� R$SOLIITION NO. - 1990 RESOLIITION ORDBRING ZMPROVEMENT AND ADVERTIB$MBNT FOR BIDS FOR TSS RBPlIIR I�TD l�il�I1�TTSNANCE OF IISLL IilO. 3 PROJBCT NO. 203 WHEREAS, the construction of certain improvements is deemed to be in the interest of the City of Fridley and the property owners affected thereby. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley as follows: 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolutions are hereby ordered to be affected and completed as required: REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF WELL NO. 3 2. The plans and specifications under the direction of the Public Works Director for such improvements are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. The Public Works Director shall accordingly prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper advertisements for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three (3) weeks (at least 21 days) , and shall specify the work to be done and will state that the bids will be opened and considered at 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, the 8th day of March, 1990, and that no bids will be considered unless sea2ed and filed with the Public Works Director. That the advertisement for bids for Repair and Maintenance of Well No. 3 shall be substantially in the standard form. PASSED 1�iIdD ADOPTED BY THE CITY CODNCIL OF T8E CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRIIARY, 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 16A NOTIC$ TO BIDD$R8 REPAIR l�ND M�iZNTENANCB OF 118LL NO. 3 PROJ$CT NO. 203 Sealed bids will be received and publicly opened by the City ot Fridley, llnoka County, l�iinnesota, at the office of the Public Works Director, 6431 University Ave., N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432 (tel. 571-3450) on Tbursday, the 8th dap ot March, 1990, at 11:00 a.m., for the furnishing of work and materials for the REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF WELL NO. 3 PROJECT NO. 203. Plans and specifications may be examined at the office of the Public Works Director and copies may be obtained for the Contractor's individual use by applying to the Public Works Director, Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Ave., N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432 (tel. 571-3450, ext. 550). Bids must be made on the basis of cash payment for work, and accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check (on a responsible bank in the State of Minnesota) or a bidder's bond made payable without condition to the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in an amount of not less than five percent (5�) of the total amount of the bid. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informalities in any bids received without explanation. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days. By order of the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota. Dated this 12th day of February, 1990. Published: FridZey Focus February 14, 1990 February 21, 1990 February 28, 1990 John G. Flora, P.E. Public Works Director Construction Bulletin February 16, 1990 February 23, 1990 March 2, 1990 . : r � c�nroF F�a� DATE: TO: COl1/IMUN[TY DEVELOI'MENT DEPART'MENT MEMORANDUM February 5, 1990 William Burns, City Manager�'%��, FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Lisa Campbell, Planning Associate SUBJECT: Establish Public Hearing for I990 Community Development Block Grant February 28, 1990, is the Anoka County deadline for submission of the 1990 Community Development Block Grant application. Staff requests the City Council establish the public hearing for February 26, 1990. The proposed 1990 allocation is $104,291. Staff proposes that $70,000 be committed to the Riverview Heights project, and $33,291 be committed to Human Services. Anoka County is requiring that $1,00o be allocated for its administrative services. This year's proposal is different from previous funding years, since no funds have been set aside for Commercial Rehabilitation. The reason for this change is the estimated cost of the next acquisition in the Riverview Heights project, $97,750. Further, in both 1988 and 1989, the funds devoted to Commercial Rehabilitation were reallocated during the funding year to Riverview Heights and Human Services respectively. The Human Resources Commission has recommended approval of the proposed allocations. The Planning Commission will be reviewing the proposal on February 14, 1990. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council establish February 26, 1990 as the public hearing date for the 1990 CDBG funding request. BD/dn M-90-77 �7 � 7a PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF 1989 C�MMZJNITY DEVELOPMENT BLACK GRANT ALIACATION Proposed Project Distribution Comments (Fridley) Riverview $70,000 Purchase & Heights relocation of Parcel 4 property in the Riverview Heights floodplain (see map) Human $33,291 Services Administrative $ 1,000 Fee 'rt,3 � ,� ;; - ' G ' 1 �11 ' ' ' ' �' ' a �o� o) � 5 K�tl qy� l 4 y 3A,! :1 �� ;• ,. � .1« � ' .►�. ' a � 'i. . �. �. 1!►� ET � � � L�lNGFELLOW �� . ,�g „ ., - _ � - : �c � . �� `g -r �1 _ 9 f f 1� ,; ��i '�c ' � � � �' — � - � � / 1 1 'J �( i (! (!��~„" �� - �,� � , . �, � ,. ' s . � . � , �< < ,. d _ • � � �, .�� •� -- � » �, ' , j . J I � .. . �- ��bl �� „ — ",� � � " i , r � � � =' •� ` �� S 3 � 0 3 I G. 351 • '� 7 � s �. � / ,s p c r> >wi p • 'j �� • ; � � � � ,. 4 = i " f � F 3 �•� I • 9 — ,. _ � .. . •. ;.,. \ 4 � !� , �, _ I 1 5 0• � ° •� � . • v N; �.• 1 � � � ��. ,.•.•: :.: - � �l .� . � � ii : � .. � . .♦ - � f . �:�::•:• � � � � I• ..� , � �\ . I r � � e98 � M � �•�� ` �, �`' ~r�� • �� w ` ,Y i . t . \ �, ..�.. !�1 : � r • /' i.. �/I ✓ � 1 = � � �� '�j �/i.It Oi/.• ) � � , • � . � i� �'r w i /J� ¢ �' � . � • ..� �� 'i l �! i • ,�;� � ,. :�: � ..:. C'3 � G� _ ` �aq � g� �"� � � <", � " �:�:� �" �89� , ;, ��,. `\ �,�� ,'�` \ �`' �.;:. . , � - .� � , � r�, � 686 � _ .. . ' � : o "� ''? 4, ' � t � `'� • p' . l ' � � •, ��. � • ' • Q�C, , ' `'� � � � � ' � � �'� ' � t� � 1 . ,� � ` . ' �s \ \ `• � ! t :� � � � � r� ' �1 �` P^��r � . �rcel 7 - Acquire i � � �, • � � - _ �� , �. - \ ,� v ' � 'r �(y + , , '• • . •� r � �� ' ,} 1 i �� rcel 9 - Acquired in 1 ' � ' ° �� ' �. i � � � • . r \ � ,•� .., � �'.`3_� � '18G6� ��.V�p' �" �� :r, 9�� , . , � \' � � � �rcel 6 - 1989 Proposed Acqut�it � P� � 's= _ = ie�3. �'' � . � � � , •' a �v) ,.� • � ' � � � �'v,�"', �'� �eGt . ' ��? '��c. � +: � srcel S- 1989 Proposed Acquisition 4•� �«� . �.• � p ,� � �' � �''- �' � p • " �,�'�' '. , \�+ � � ' ° � !^� �' �+..� �`�� QL (II� to .. 0 ,' (� ,�gy. ��.y r"•'� ' 1 � ��•'V C'' -%� �' %�� 1 i�7 ' 1 i a�i �, KEY H � ��3 � .� � �� _ F�, `O� t1.1J.0 �� ' . Pr•viously AcquMed Property �! ��"� �` r' �� (�� y � y 5o i � � �� ! � � �� Propossd Acquisitions � �� ,� C�. � � ° ..`` _ 78 � qty Par rop�rty \ � �� .�-� : , ._ � \ „� o � . , \ �3 ( •'� z ��. Scah:1'=200, • � j ' � Z--�; �� `�. � :1 �''�� o � s * �. �� ` � , �, ' ,,,� - ..l . � 34 MEM ORANDUM �i city �f frl�i•r W�iam C. Hunt _ •4i1 Y�I��r�ity A�� N.E. F� � r �• r, r �a A... e. s s a � z Assistant to the Cfty Mane�er ��en• (�1!)i71-i�i0 MEMO TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGER �� , FROM: WILLIAM C. BIINT, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER SIIBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO CHARTER BECTIONS 7.04, 7.05, 7.07, AND 7.09 DATE: FEBRIIARY 7, 1990 At its meeting of January 29 the Fridley Charter Commission voted to recommend certain amendments to Chapter 7 of the Fridley City Charter which relate to budget schedules and to the matter of passing the budget. The Charter Commission is recommending that in light of recent changes in State Law the budget be adopted by resolution rather than by ordinance. These changes are indicated in the attached ordinance. Also attached is a January 19, 1990 memo from Sharon Fetting to me outlining the rationale behind the proposed changes. The only difference is that in Section 7.04 the Charter Commission chose to retain lanquage about publication even though they agreed to change the consideration of the budget from the first to the last regular monthly meeting in August. At its January 29 meeting the Charter Commission also voted to expedite this matter to the Council for consideration prior to the approval of the January 29 minutes at the February 26, 1990 meeting of the Charter Commission. Accordingly, I request that you present this ordinance to the Council at its meeting of February 12, 1990 with the request to set a public hearing on the proposed changes on the Charter for March 12, 1990. WCH/jb cc: Fridley Charter Commission � : : � ORDINANCE NO. !�N ORDINANCB AMENDING BECTIONB 7.04, 7.05, 7.07, AND 7.09 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: That the following sections of the Fridley City Charter be amended as follows: Section 7.04. PREPARATION OF ANNUAL BUDGET. 1. The City Manager shall prepare the estimates for the annual budget which shall include any estimated deficit for the current year. The estimates of expenditures shall be submitted by each department to the City Manager. Each estimate shall be divided into three (3) major subdivisions as follows: (a) Salaries and Wages, (b) Ordinary Expenses, (c) Capital Outlay. Salary detail shall show a list of all salaried officers and positions with salary allowance and nun►ber of persons holding each. Wages shall be broken down in sufficient detail to justify the request. Ordinary expenses shall be broken down into such detail as the City Manager shall direct. Capital Outlay shall be itemized as to items and amounts. (Ref. Ord. 625) 2. In parallel columns shall be added the amounts expended under similar headings for the two (2) preceding fiscal years, and, as far as practicable, the amounts expended and estimated for expenditure during the current year. In addition to estimates of expenditures, the City Manager shall prepare a detailed statement of revenues collected for the two (2) preceding completed fiscal years with amounts estimated to be collected for the current fiscal year, and an estimate of revenues for the ensuing fiscal year. The estimates shall be submitted to the Council at its €i-�s� last regular monthly meeting in August and shall be published twic �i the official publication prior to �aee��g November i y ef. Ord. 625j �v� ��,�t.v,2�� Section 7.05. PASSAGE OF THE UDGET. The budget shall be #�e a principal item of business at the €�r� last regular monthly meeting of the Council in August, and the Council shall hold subsequent meetings from time to time until all the estimates have been considered. The meetings shall be so conducted as to give interested citizens a reasonable amount of time in which to be heard, and an opportunity to ask questions. The budget estimates shall be read in full and the City Manager shall explain the various items thereof as fully as may be deemed necessary by the Council. The annual budget finally agreed upon shaZl set forth in such detail as may be determined by the City Council, the complete financial plan of the City for the ensuing fiscal year, and shall be signed by the majority of the Council upon being adopted. It shall indicate the sums to be raised and from what sources, and the sums to be spent and for what purposes, according to the plan indicated in Section 7.04. The total sum appropriated shall not exceed the total estimated revenue. The Council shall adopt the budget a�� }'�° �^^*�� ^€ A��ae�--� - bv resolution in accordance with State Law. The resolution shall set forth the total of the budget and the totals of the major divisions of the budget, according to the plan indicated in Section 7.04. The budget resolution as adopted shall be published in the official publication. (Ref. Ord. 625) Section 7.07. ALTERATIONS IN THE BUDGET. After the budget shall have been duly adopted, the Council shall not have power to increase the amounts therein fixed, whether by the insertion of new items or otherwise, beyond the estimated revenues, unless the actual receipts shall exceed such estimates, and in that event, not beyond such actual receipts. The sums fixed in the budget shall be and become appropriated at the beginning of the fiscal year for the several purposes named therein, and no other. The Council may at any time, by resolution passed by a vote of at least four (4) members of the Council, reduce salaries or the sums appropriated for any purpose by the budget, or by vote of at least four (4) members of the Council authorize the transfer of sums from the unexpended balances of the budget to other purposes. Section 7.09. LEVY AND COLLECTZON OF TAXES. g�� .�er-e +--��'� a�•, ^� *T^•,^�^'^�r ��^'� -�°�r In accordance with Minnesota State Law, the Council shall levy by resolution the taxes necessary to meet the requirements of the budget for the ensuing fiscal year. The City Clerk shall transmit to the county auditor annually, not later than the '^�� date rec�uired by Minnesota Law, a statement of all the taxes levied, and such taxes shall be collected and the payment thereof be enforced with and in like manner as state and county taxes. No tax shall be invalid by reason of any informality in the manner of levying the same, nor because the amount levied shall exceed the amount required to be raised for the special purpose for which the same is levied, but in that case the surplus shall go into a suspense fund, and shall be used to reduce the levy for the ensuing year. (Ref. Ord. 625) PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 18C R'O: FAOl�i: CITY OF 1rRZDLBY l[Bl[ORlI�DIIM �ILLIliM C. HIINT, 1188IBTl�I�i'P TO TS8 CITY 1L�11�Q1aER BHAROId FBTTING, STliFF 1�CCOU1�1'PAI�iT �t" BIIBJECT : CHliPTSR BBVBN OF THE CITY CHI�RTBR DFiTB : J�iUl1RY l9 , 19 9 O As you are aware, with the passage of the property tax bills in 1988 and during the special legislative session last year, certain sections of Chapter Seven of the City Charter have been rendered outdated. I have prepared some suggested changes for these sections. I would like to review the specific sections with you which should be changed to be in conformance with Minnesota State Law. Section 7.04, Subdivision 2 requires the budget estimates to be "submitted to the Council at its first regular monthly meeting in August". I believe this was required to ensure there was enough time for the public to review the budget prior to it's adoption in October. Because State Law now requires that the budget be adopted in November or December, and, we will not be notified of our levy limit until August l, the presentation of the budget at the first meeting in August seems to be premature. I have changed this to read the "last regular monthly meeting in August". This will allow for presentation of the budget prior to the "proposed tax levy" being certified by September l, as now required by I�IId Statutes, Chapter 275.065, subdivision 1. Section 7.04 also requires that prior to the August meeting. ] the fact all taxpayers will no� property taxes. This should be the property tax notices, we resolution and a summary budget State Law. the budget be published in summary have deleted this section due to � receive notice of the proposed adequate notification. Along with publish both the final budget statement as required by Minnesota Section 7.05 also refers to having the budget "be the principal item of business at the first meeting of the Council in August." I changed this to also read the last meeting in August. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 275.065, subdivision 6 now requires us to hold a public hearing between November 15 and December 20 to adopt our budget. The law states we must adopt a final budget and property tax levy at the public hearing and that the final property tax levy shall be adopted prior to passage of the budget. These new requirements conflict with Section 7.05 of the Charter which requires us to adopt a budqet in October by ordinance. As you are aware, passage of an ordinance requires two readings at separate meetings. I believe in order to �neet this requirement, we will have to pass our budqet with a resolution rather than an ordinance. I have chanqed this section to read "adopt the budget by resolution." Other cities such as Robbinsdale, Coon Rapids, Blaine, and Brooklyn Center approve their budgets by resolution. Section 7.07 also has been chanqed to refer to alterations in the budget being passed by a resolution rather than an ordinance. Section 7.09 requires the Council to levy by resolution a property tax levy by November 5 of each year and to transmit this to the County Auditor by November 10. I have chanqed these sentences to read "in accordance with Minnesota State Law". The above is an overview of the attached sections of Chapter Seven and their canflict with Minnesota Statutes. I would appreciate it if you would review them with the Charter Commission. I would be happy to answer any questions or provide any other information that may be helpful. cc: William W. Burns, City Manaqer Richard D. Pribyl, Finance Director :i fpR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 12, 1990 g�s sBRVrcEs Lamb Kechanical 1433 Utica Avenue So, �57 St. Louis Park, I�I 55416 GBNERliL COIdTR71CTOR John Beissel Inc. 153 E Thompson Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55118 By: Douglas Hayes By: Michae2 Charley FMC - Navel Systems Division 4800 East River Road Fridley, l�l 55421 By: Robert Halverson Langer Construction 54 East Moreland Avenue West St . Paul , 1�1 55118 HEATING Conrad Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 509 - lst Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55413 By: Gregory Seebeck Equipment Supply Inc. 593 North Fairview Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 Lamb Mechanical 1433 Utica Avenue So, #57 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 S B S Mechanical, Inc. 7160 Madison Avenue West Golden Valley, MN 55427 By: David Hodgson By: Douglas Hayes By: Gunvant Bhatt PLIIMBING Lamb Mechanical 1433 Utica Avenue South, #57 St. Louis Park, I�i 55416 By: Douglas Hayes � CE 1CING Herbst & Sons 2299 County Road H New Brighton, l�t � 55112 By: Charles Herbst LICL�i8E6 CLYDE WILEY Bldc�h Ir�sp • DARREL CLARK Ct�ief Bldg Ofcl Same Same CLYDE WILEY gldg/Mer.tz Insp. Same Same Same STATE OF MINN DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl APPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FZRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR • •• � FOR CONCIIRRENCE BY THE CITY COIINCIL FSBRIIARY 12, 1990 JMG Contracting 5141 Abbott Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55410 22 BBTIMATES Phase I- 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 (Contractor) FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6, 500. 00 Herrick & Newman 205 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Month of January, 1990 .......$ 2,861.10 Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecutor for the Month of November, 1989 ......$ 7,655.00 Services Rendered as City Prosecutor for the Month of December, 1989 ......$ AEC Engineers & Designers 511 - llth Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 Phase I- 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 (Inspection Services) Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ HNTB 6700 France Avenue South Suite 260 Minneapolis, MN 55435 8,019.00 367.00 Design of 1.5 MG Elevated Reservoir At Lock Park Project No. 196 Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,500.00 22A �,�y ,�.� F�,i,d,Qey Pub.�cc �cb�tt2� Dp.pa�e.7rre�'+x 6431 Un��j Averuae N. E. F�a.y, M�ir,ne�o*a. SSa32 FRc?M: G,�� o� Fn,i�t,eey D.i.v.i,aivn TLE: E.aLinu.t� No. 2/F-ina.e T�: Hono�rab�Pe hayon and Gi.t� Coun�i.e Cf,� 04 Fn,id.�ey 6431 (ln.i.v¢�cai� Aveyu.ae N . E . FnidFey, � 55432 DA7E: Ia2c��c. 18 , 1989 pp�,�,pd �i1d,vl.g: 12/14/89 CODE �601-73-000-42400 Ft7R: JNG Cc�nxnar.tin6 4253 - 10.th Av¢nue Scx.i.tlz µtn�¢,t�o�i,o, MJ 55407 3. 0!►�G Con,c�te Gn�und S#onaFie R�6¢�c�o.i�t R¢pa,vc p'ro�ect No . 192 STATFJ►�EJYr OF (�C ------------------- ------------------- Q�-�J E�,� �,� Th.i,o To#a.e • p�.i;ce W�iz E.e�ura� Co►�.t�rar� I�in Quant,c�! -------------------------------------------------------------- � .2.1 R�mve and �'aeP�ac',e cau.�h.in& , �4 i..2 . Z R2lR�V2 4!'1L� N�p�L'.2 Cauek .eh�26 1.2.3 P�e.e�.v�e �ec-tion. c�rar'h ¢xpo4e.d -d�-e,� 1.2.4 Roo� Topp�ng 1. Z . 5 hbd.ir6y �coo� ►raru,�nb �.2.6 Roo� Venta 1.3. 1 Ex.t�.i.on .�andb.Fa.at 1. 3 . Z C,�rzc�t� .aw��6cu'-e •�epa.i�,e 1.3.3 Coa� -d'ee2.Z 1.3.4 Cl�evnon CIM Sy-atp.m �vo6 .aux�ace _ ll�i� I�� L.unl� Sun'► $36 . 00/¢t. currp sum LturP Sum 23 v¢rt.t.a Lur►P Sum LwrP Sum L1.urP Sum La,urP Su►►� $8,000.00 $6,000.00 $18,000.00 ss,000.00 $3,000.00 56,900.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.00 $10,000.00 $48,000.00 $118,900.00 1 10D.d$ 1 100.0$ 500 � 1 23 1 100.0$ �oo.o$ 100.0$ 1D0.0$ 100.0$ 1 1Q0.0$ 1 f00.0� 1 100.0$ $8,000.00 $G,000.00 $18,000.00 ss,000.oc $3,000.00 $b,900.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.00 $10,000.00 $48,000.00 $118,900.00 sur�r�v : tLr,ir-ina,�. CvrLt�rar,t Arr�un� Ra.v.i.aed Cort t�r�tr� Arrcx.uz.t Va.Pue ConpE¢.t�.d �#.o Ua.t2 ,4rruc�r+.t RQ.ta,in¢.d ( 0$ ) Le,aa Arrcx,u�.t Pa.i.d Paev.i�xcaey AM7UNIT D(,!E THI S �STIM4TED C.ERTIFICATE t7F TFE C'LWTRACTc?R $�18,900.00 $0.00 $118,900.00 $0.00 $112,400.00 $6,500.00 Z irov�eby c+ent,i.6y �haz #he �2 pe�c�o�urrect arrd. � rra.�r.ia,e,a .eupr�.d #o da,te uncl,� #he ��rrrra o� �t�e co►�,t�rnc..t �v�. #�'+,i.a Proo�ec-t, artd a.ZZ acuthno-ized chan�e�a �►e.tv , have an ac.�.r,a.e va.Eue wzdPn #l�te cvn�a,�t o� �z arrrx.�rt.t.e .d�tcx,�rt vr� �.i.o ¢.6turn� ( and, �,,e �,tr,Q,e qu,au,,t,i,t,�,e,o o� #he �ir,�,e �atiirca.te ane coyrec�7 , artd �►ax �h.i.o Q.a#,irrut2 -i,a �ct,at and co�v�e.c� , � no pan� ob #he ��M�ur�.t Ltie Th.<,a F.at.ifra�2" ha,a bQ.Qrc n,ec¢.i�ved. ' —� �" � . �� - /' � � � I — DATE: � Z �` J �' Co"rr�ira�ton.' �a ' Au�n.i,z¢.d. e( T.i,t,2,� 1 ; _ �, CERTIFICATE OF TF� FJVGINEER -• .� • • • - •• -• • • �• � • r- • • � • � • • ^ • • . • • � • • r • � • • • � • ' � ' ' • cm u� �em�v, rNS�crvR �� / � �� '' � - _ - . . . .�1! � �r.� ...- Q DATE: c�� ? � /v � ;- _ .�._ . ..-. J �� J G. F4ona.. P.E. ' Gb�►fza D-v�a�c�v�c 22B 22C February 12, 1990 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY PiiASE I- 3.0 MG CONCRETE RESERVOIR REPAIR PROJECT NO. 192 We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the project. All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor. So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspection that being December 21. 1989. February 12, 1990 City of Fridley PHASE I- 3.0 MG CONCRETE RESERVOIR REPAIR PROJECT NO. 192 CBRTIFICAT$ OF CONTRACTOR This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $118,900.00 and the final payment of $6,500.00 for the improvement project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this project. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. JMG CONTRACTING, II�IC, � , � � r � � �V , l: /" � �'� --------- - � ' "i i L John Gearim President 22D /� CITY OF FRZDLEY PIIBLIC WORRS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVZSION 6431 IIniversity Ave., N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 February 12, 1990 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley C/O William W. Burns, City Manager 6431 University Ave., N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Council Members: CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Final Estimate for Phase I- 3.0 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192, for JMG Contracting, Inc. , 4253 - lOth Ave., So., Minneapolis, MN 55407. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of PHASE I- 3. 0 MG CONCRETE RESERVOIR REPAIR PROJECT N0. 192 and f ind the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one-year contractual maintenance bond commence on December 21, 1989. Respectfully submitted, i'.-'�� ohn G. Flora Director of Public Works Prepared b; Checked by 22E � w F < F tA N � w u� .� .-� ("1 F w � U N < C r1 � O F +i � _ .� O� �U U O w S, � O. F N .(In W � O�i 4 7+ U O m +i � a o a a a ~ m F � � U U � N U _] < F O !-� .i i Qi i i B i � � h h n (`7 N i m � � � � i � � U'f i < , < a � � C i N z a6 � _ � ..�i a .o � �a m� � oi � � fA i F U -� i a� � ui � W �9 i r� a _ � F < ti i r-� 2 !� i U UI uD i � N i N i A i B ' m � .�O a t- a� � [E'!1 h N N v � ui i N i 4' � i � F � i > 2 ivv a 0 t- u a !� x � i O N 4V1 N W A e B�B 8 O� m m m m B m B O m m B� 9 i n i B i a ii �BB.rBOOtiUmBNmm�JB�f�BBBB i W� V� i�O a �D V�N�Tht()�D9U��f78 V7�OL�NIAtd�Gmf'f i el' �('I � N n NuYh�O.-�l'�B•+V� V�PdNf'1!� V'�m ^��+N i•+ � T� N n a�c0(']cAC`iV�6�mt�mO�NI�C'��DIVIA9.�[�c0 i dJ i B� a0 n f7 l9 Q� ('I ('f V� m W N CV a ifl c9 •-i .-� f� m•-� �•� N i B i 0� i h ii a�+ Uf N IA N P tV fG U1 '+ N tD II1 � N b N W � N� �A � Q� n N {R i11 YI 41 id N N � � N � V' f W n � IU r � f n � t (D i n , � a � n t � � u � � � n i � � u . . C9 m B �D m O S 8 m i m � O � a u m B tn �9 V7 -1 m m m �� T� iA n � i i u C a0 f'1 ul �O � N l� m[*/ � T��D � T �� n c� .r cv � a� c� .. �v �.-. � v�.�, �� .r .o m c� m cv �o � m� u� � a� � n N (A � i i u .� PI .-� u1 � -� N � � � N � vl u a cv �n .-, a a � a��'i ��v a m a � �n � � � ur n � i N i a � i � �i t0 �d 61 � m O� �L B B B B m B B B t� m m 9 m �.nacva�t� ui�n�D�riBCSaamr�evi.:�timm N u'1 l� �O •r h� m ('f �l' iV N B 9 il1 h B++ P•� N 11� V� 47 (� cD N 7' Q'� �A h V� N B tD m lA 01 � f7 m 01 ('7 (`7 C' B t0 N.-� N N •-� IV m W I!► � U1 a U1 �!k Y! N NN N(t1 a N N IA NN C0m9BB9Bm t� B f9 B t9 B B m -�-�aCNQf nNOQ�'� �o n �a u� .. �n .o u� a �u � � rn a N u a m a n i m i a i f� i �f7 i.� i � � � vi � ,o � ri � m � a� � B � (V � �0 i -i i . i . � i N � a0 � (V � � � � i N i N i i i � ri � � � N i i m m� B i �O i � �W NN i �0 VS N a b 1 N a � ri y r � t N mmmmmmmmm Rsm mmm m mme..eaem.om� �ai mmm�m aieo�aaocotYmvim mm �mui.:cv Btl� V�hf7Tm V� V�fV N9 [�Bf`7N�0 �l4(�INSc0C701t� V� �Dm �OmmNb NaC�NNt�mf7N� �9u7 �Nm Ip�{pN1p(ONh�b/A NN bNN m m � � m Q1 N N N � Q1 � i B � 1!7 � 0� i v� � N i N i N i m� u't vi 0� �O ti i M i i N � � B � Q' i a� i N I �i M � � � u7 � B �O N E-� fr7 �^ a w °Cwt- m mtN- a r- �'i s � cn Wapdw� �i aa�u°�,iF+�aa Fc�a°Cw a� N t-. ,.�ao � cnr omoem wx a F F s x u sa�n c�mm�c-ama � ao � m < a cn < <nw�c�►�ma« �-. r+ c� � w c� ►+ a t- �as c�sma � z � FN7C �. ►+ �n �s F ...IN�Hk+F � rrWl�0. t9 f.1Wr+�CNA ..i a hti .T .t k1 M t� O i�7 47 N Z M F � M t� i r+ 0. O k. o �sm wm sma mv�..ac�az ��.s 0. � �� f.) a2<;L..IL9U7C UOtA iiF<FR1 W t > O i t-fU0 W 7CU <ih..7FSr+N4 <45x W W f � q C.1 (X U rr rr t+7 f- O��+ N 4 7C z W O t- v+ OC i W t+lO?+9CF7k 7Cp U<47�-+N7COOOCOCt-W < 0. W i t-� F9CLkO0CH N .X�<Ot)t�l^ aa 0. U i N r+ FCC <NO �Sdi..1 O OC N W t� 7� i 7 7CZ7CryZNU 7CZ�r+ C F�ese�]OeG�.s < i n 61r+»0.<tW� iaC�11->OC]�Nmi«W < ..1 i t <� V W f.W7ta9�f't7C7�CZUi7C240.NNNt�lf Q1 � au� m�p mism•re»mn m m�u��i � �A C') 4� IA t0 CI Y7 f 1� �p i 01 W �++�T�•�•�q�� ,~,� Th �Nf~9 22F