The URL can be used to link to this page

02/26/1990 - 5340'� FRIDI,$Y CITY CODNCIL M8$TING '�tT ATTENDENCE SHEET MONDAY " �� 26 _t , 1440 7:30 P.M. pI.�EASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ITEM PRYNT NAME {CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER ; � � p � O D.�e�£ k'� �%ll�/ e -�'h �� : �► �. � � �5'�7D �}� � � r.�� v /�-o/ ��+e.Cd� ! -' <�h _ v � �. ��' �/ �� ., /%% /'� />D�2,� .�c.� s ��.� - �'".� o�-"`-_-`-,--- � FRIDLEY CZTY COIINCIL MEETING, FEBRUARY 26, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING (CONTINIIED): Public Hearing for 1990 Community Development Block Grant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2B OLD BIISINE88: Second Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code by Amending Appendix F to Provide for the Adjustment of Salaries for the Mayor and Councilmembers in accordance with Section 2.07 of the Charter of the City of Fridley � / (7'' W � ,/ � . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3A Special Use Permit Request for Keith's Auto Body, �7570 Highway 65 N.E. . . . . . . . . . . . . � . 4 - 4Q .� �-� �, / � Variance Request, AR #89-1 �or Keith's Auto Body, 7570 Highway 65 N.E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 50 � rrEw BosirrESS: Approval of Release of Tax Forfeit Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6I co� % ��'� ' / Paqe 2 FRIDLEY CITY COtJNCIL MEETING, FEBRIIARY 26, 1990 NEW BOSINESS (CONTINIIED): Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of February 14, 1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7L A. Approval of 1990 Community � Development•Block•Grant•••••• _ Proposal 7 7B 7H - 7L I ), � �v G Approval of Office Paper Recycling Contract with '� Aagaard Sanitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8A ,� -, � ",� U,�'`�,� �� Resolution Modifying the ,/ Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 to Reflect Increased Project Costs and Increased Geographic Area and Modifying the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 9 to Reflect Increased Project Costs and �;� Increased Geographic Area �,n� Within Redevelopment Proj ect �/(Q/� / No. 1; and Establishing � � Proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 and � Approving and Adopting the Proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan Relating Thereto . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9F Paqe 3 FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, FEBRIIARY 26, 1990 NEW BOSINESS (CONTINQED): � Resolution Approving Plat, P.S. #90-01, Northco Business Park 2nd Addition . . . . . . . . . . . � Resolution Ordering the Improvement, Approval of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 1 (Overlay) . . . . . . . . . . . � � Resolution Ordering Improvement, Approval of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Street Improvement Project No. . . . 10 - lOM U' � � , . . . . . . 11 - 11C � ST. 1990 - 10 (Sealcoat) . . . . . . . ( 2 / � /� Resolution�rdering Advertisement for Bids; emoval and Replacement of Miscellaneous Concrete, Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk - 1990 . . . . � �� s � J . . . . 12 - 12C . . . . . . . 13 - 13B Resolution Ordering Improvement and Advertisement for Bids for the Repair and Maintenance of Phase II of the 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 200 . . . . . . . . 14 - 14C �l � �� i� �' Paqe 4 FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, FEBRIIARY 26, 1990 Paqe 5 NEW BIISINE88 (CONTINIIED): Resolution to Advertise for � Bids for One (1) 1250 GPM Pumper/Aerial Tower . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 15B / � �% '" � � / v°" � � � � � ` e r nd Adjustment, Grant � No. 025 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / . . . 16 r � iW �°� p'� �' � � � �.,� , . U -� �,,�' � ,�, a ims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 - 18A Estimates . . . . . . ADJOIIRN• . . . . . . . . 19 - 19C ( � ( � I ( VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK March 4 -10,1989 V1�itliam J. Nee Mayor Fridiey. MN WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, a Christian social service organization, is celebrating its 94th year of service to the people of Minnesota and the nation; and WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is making a valuable contribution to the people of Minnesota by providing 2 residential treatment centers for emotionally handicapped boys; 3 programs serving autistic, autistic-like and/or developmentally disabled children and youth; 40 treatment foster homes and group homes for infants, children and youth; 5 homes for elderly and/or mentally disabled adults; 41 senior citizen dining sites in Anoka and Hennepin Counties; 2 correctional programs for men, and a jail, workhouse, and work- release correctional facility for female offenders; 3 housing complexes for families, the handicapped, and the elderly; and 4 long-term care facilities; and WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America, throughout its compassionate, yet practical crusade, is extending spiritual fellowship as it provides urgent relief,• and WHEREAS, the Volunteers of America is commemorating its founding in 1896 and urges others to uphold the American philanthropic spirit through their commitment to help those in need; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that 1, William J. Nee, Mayor of the Ciry of Fridley, hereby proclaim March 4- 10, 1990 as VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this proclamation be transmitted to the Volunteers of America as evidence of our esteem. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,1 have set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Fridley to be affixed this 26th day of February,1990. VVIL,LIAM 7. NEE, MAYOR TRE MINIITES OF T8E REGIILAR MEBTING OF THE FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL OF FEBRIIARY 12, 1990 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Billings, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and Councilwoman Jorgenson MEMBERS ABSENT: None PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION: NATIONAL CHILD PASSENGER SAFETY AWARENESS WEEK - FEBRUARY 11 - 17. 1990• Mayor Nee issued a proclamation declaring Child Passenger Safety Awareness Week, February 11 - 17, 1990 and encouraged citizens of Fridley to buckle in themselves and their children while driving. Mayor Nee asked the City staff to bring this proclamation to the attention of the local newspaper. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, JANUARY 22. 1990: MoTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: The following item was added as an addition to Item 22 of the agenda: (22F) Estimate for the Civic Center Remodeling, Pay Application No. 15 for $220,814.87. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM. VISITORS: There was no response from the audience under this item of business. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF FSBRIIARY 12. 1990 PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARING• 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON A FINAL PLAT. P.S. #90-01, BY ROBERT LARSEN PARTNERS, INC.. TO REPLAT LOT 2, BLOCK 1. NORTHCO BUSINESS PARK INTO TWO SEPARATE PARCELS, GENERALLY LOCATED DIRECTLY EAST OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE, NORTH OF 71ST AVENUE. AND SOUTH OF 73RD AVENUE• MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman ,7orgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:45 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this parcel is located south of 73rd Avenue and east of the University Avenue service road. She stated the request is to subdivide the property into two lots, as the lender for the construction financing would not authorize a loan for the entire parcel, only the area necessary for the first phase. Ms. Dacy stated this dictated a separate legal description to be created. She stated in this first phase, the petitioners are proposing to construct a one-story office/warehouse buildinq. She stated the parcel to the north will remain vacant until the second phase is constructed. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission considered the plat and has recommended approval with the following four stipulationss (1) Stormwater calculations shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit; (2) Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both parcels prior to issuance of a building permit; (3) a ponding easement(s) shall be dedicated on the plat or by separate document prior to the issuance of a building permit; (4) The landscaping plan shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit; and the fifth stipulation was added by the Planning Commission (5) Any change or modification to the property line as proposed shall be resolved with staff prior to review by the City Council. Ms. Dacy stated after meeting with the City Attorney and Building Inspector, it was determined that the last stipulation meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements in regard to the proposed location of the building. Councilman Billings questioned if there were any drawings showing this particular lot and the contour of the roadway in relationship to the common driveway. Ms . Dacy stated the common driveway is proposed on the service road opposite the Soo Line parcel. She stated a driveway access may be obtained from Northco Drive and explained the configuration of the roadway. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TINQ OF FEBRIIARY 12. 1990 PAGE 3 No persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed plat. MOTION by Councilman BilZings to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 7:52 p.m. OLD BUSINESS• 2. ORDINANCE NO. 940 AN ORDINANCE TO REPEAL ORDINANCE NO. 930 PERTAINING TO VACATION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT jGENA-RAE ADDITION): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and adopt Ordinance No. 940 on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 941 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 936 REGARDING AN EASEMENT VACATION IN ONAWAY ADDITION: MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading and adopt Ordinance No. 941 on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4. ORDINANCE NO 942 AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE (GENA-RAE ADDITION): MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and adopt Ordinance No. 942 on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 5. ORDINANCE NO. 943 AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE �ONAWAY ADDITION): MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading and adopt Ordinance No. 943 on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS• 6. RESOLUTION NO. 11-1990 PROVIDING_FOR THE PUBLIC SALE OF APPROXIMATELY $9 445 000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS OF 1990: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated the City of Fridley, like many other Minnesota cities, is being impacted by recent tax increment financing amendments. He stated the law limits use of tax - - -- FRIDLEY CITY COtJNCIL MEETING OF F88RIIARY 12, 1990 PAGE 4 increment financing generated by pre-1979 districts, unless tax increment is needed to retire bonds that have been sold prior to 1990. Mr. Burns stated the City�s Southwest Quadrant project is a pre-1979 district and several redevelopment proposals have been considered, but, to date, the City has not successfully accomplished the redevelopment objectives. He stated in order to comply with the law, it is necessary to refinance the debt on existing tax increment bonds. He stated this refinancing will allow the City additional tax increment to support projects through the year 2009. Mr. Burns stated if the City does not proceed with the refinancing, tax increment financing cannot be used on any pre- 1979 parcels beyond the year 2000 (the current maturation date of the bonds). Mr. Burns stated over the last several weeks, staff has been reviewing the need for tax increment projects, refinancing alternatives, and current cash flows in these districts. He stated at a recent Housing & Redevelopment Authority meeting, Mr. Casserly outlined various refinancing alternatives. He stated the recommendation was to refinance all the remaining debt, as opposed to part of the debt, and that this be done in a manner to defer principal payments beyond the year 2000. He stated by refinancing the total remaining debt, it is believed $6,733,683 in savings can be generated through reduced principal and interest payments and this amount can be applied to new projects anywhere in the tax increment districts. He stated beyond the year 2000 and to the year 2009, $1,000,000 to $1,500,000 per year in new tax increment revenue can be justified from any pre-1979 district or about $13,000,000 for the ten year period. He stated all of this revenue could be used to support projects that will add considerably to the economic viability of the center city. Mr. Burns stated if the Council adopts this proposal, all necessary steps to refinance the bond issue should be completed by the end of March. He stated the Council would receive and consider bids at a special meeting on March 7, 1990. Mr. Burns introduced the City's financial agent, Mr. Jim Casserly and the City's bond counsel, Mr. Jim O'Meara. He stated both Mr. Casserly and Mr. O'Meara are here to respond to any questions from the Council. Councilman Billings stated it is his understanding that the City is anticipating a lower interest rate on the bonds to be sold and that repayment of the debt will be over a greater period of time than on the bonds that now exist. Councilman Billings stated he relates it to this hypothetical situation that if he had a payment of $900 at 11 percent interest for 15 years and refinances the same amount of principal at 9 FRIDLEY CITY COQNCIL MEBTINQ OF FEBRIIARY 12. 1990 PAGE 5 percent interest over a longer period of time, it reduces his payment. He stated if he then takes this amount saved by reduction in his payment and sets it aside, there will be enough in savings at a certain point in time to pay off the loan early. Councilman Billings stated he understands the current bonds will be paid off in the year 2000 and the amount the City would pay each year, under the refinancing program, is less than what is now being paid and, if the difference between the two payments is set aside, the City could, conceivably, have the funds to pay off the bonds in the year 2000, if they chose to do so. Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated this is also his understanding of the refinancing proposal. He stated from all the numbers he has seen, this is correct and it doesn't appear there is any disadvantage to refinancing. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Pribyl if he was comfortable with the numbers presented by Mr. Casserly and Mr. O'Meara. Mr. Pribyl stated he reviewed the debt schedules and is confident they are prepared accurately. He stated there is sufficient future cash flow to service the debt. Councilman Schneider stated he understands if nothing further develops in the tax increment districts, there is sufficient revenue to service the debt through the year 2009, if the City chooses not to redeem the bonds. MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 1i-1990. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING APPENDIX F TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADJiTSTMENT OF SALARIES FOR THE MAYOR .AND COUNCILMEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2 07 OF THE CIiA�TER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: Mayor Nee stated this ordinance would provide for about a 4 percent increase in City Council salaries. He stated the yearly salary for Mayor would be $8,400; $6,900 for Councilmember-at-Large; and $6,100 for the Ward Councilmembers. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL IrI$ETINa OF FBBRIIARY 12, 1990 PAGE 6 8. AUTHORIZE CONTRACT FOR A RECYCLING SURVEY: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated during budget discussions, there was a meeting with several members of the Environmental Quality Commission to discuss recycling. He stated from that meeting, it was suggested the City consider a citizens survey and ask residents what they wanted to do with recycling. He stated it is requested the Council authorize the execution of a contract with C. J. Olson for a recycling survey. Mr. Burns stated the purpose of the survey is to quantify residents' attitudes towards major recycling alternatives, current recycling habits, and residents' satisfaction with the current recycling program. He stated several approaches are being considered, but residents will not be asked directly what they think of the options. He stated questions will be developed that measure attitudes towards the different approaches. Mr. Burns stated the consultant would pre-test the survey and will cross-tabulate the data and submit a written report. He stated the survey would be completed in 28 days at a cost not to exceed $13,468. He stated the project can easily be funded from the City's SCORE monies received through the County. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated she understands that SCORE funds can only be spent a certain number of ways and that this survey would qualify for this funding. Mr. Burns stated it is true that SCORE funds can only be used for certain items, but there is reference to "promotions" and he felt this survey would qualify under this category. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the SCORE funds could be used for recycling. Mr. Burns stated some of the SCORE funds could be used to defray costs for hauling. He stated about $126,000 will be available from this source of funding and it is expected about $112,000 would be used. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize entering into a contract with C. J. Olson Market Research to design and conduct a recycling survey for the City in an amount not to exceed $13,468. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TINd OF FBBRIIARY 12. 1990 PAGE 7 9. �ECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 31. 1990• MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of January 31, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Billings stated in regard to Mr. Kondrick's reference to the Canadian Geese Relocation Program, he stated this was discussed informally about a year ago and in response to the Parks and Recreation Commission's motion, the following action was taken: MOTION by Councilman Billings to request staff to obtain information and costs on the DNR's Canadian Geese Relocation Program covering options and alternatives and report back at the Council meeting on March 12, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. RECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1990• A-1. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE VAR #90-01, TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM SOUARE FOOTAGE OF A FREE-STANDING SIGN FROM 80 S UARE FEET TO 177.25 SOUARE FEET, ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1; LOT 1, BIACK 2. GREAT NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL CENTER EAST THE SAME BEING 5350 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD N E (MINIKAHDA MINI STORAGE), BY LEROY SIGNS: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this property is located south of I-694 and is bordered on the east by the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks. She stated the petitioner is requesting a variance for a 4 by 8 foot directional sign to add to the existing sign. She stated in 1985, a variance was granted to increase the size of the sign from 80 to 133 square feet. Ms. Dacy stated the Appeals Commission has recommended this variance be denied as it does not meet the criteria of the Sign ordinance. She stated the Commission felt to grant the variance would be contrary to the intent of the ordinance and that the square footage of the existing sign was adequate. She stated the existing sign could be redesigned to incorporate the directional sign. Mr. Dave Inman, representing the owners of Minikahda Mini-Storage, stated the size of the sign they are considering is 2 by 18 feet or 36 square feet. Ms. Dacy questioned if this sign is different than the one submitted at the Appeals Commission. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF FBBRIIARY 12. 1990 PAGE 8 Mr. Inman stated the drawing was incorrect and the size of the sign is 2 by 18 feet. He stated he understands one of the items they have to prove is that there is an exceptional, or not an ordinary, circumstance that applies to the property. Mr. Inman stated their sign happens to be the smallest one in that area in comparison with other retail facilities. He stated Wickes and Plywood Minnesota both have larger signs. Mr. Inman stated to redesign the existing sign would be difficult and costly in order to have any visibility at all. He stated when a variance was received in 1985, the original plan also called for a wall sign that would be about 120 square feet and this was never done. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated as far as the Plywood Minnesota sign, this was existing prior to adoption of the Sign Ordinance. He stated a variance has already been granted to the petitioner to increase the size of the sign to 133 square feet. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to deny this variance request, VAR #90-01 based on the findings recommended by the Appeals Commission. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Mr. Inman stated they are trying to attract persons driving on I-694. He stated they were recently successful in a tax protest and the fact was brought up that the property has been in operation for four years and after the first eight months of operation, the occupancy was at 50 percent and has not increased beyond this point. Mayor Nee stated the problem is that this is not grounds to grant the variance. Councilman Billings stated the Plywood Minnesota Sign was grandfathered in and if the Council had the ability to decrease the sign, it would be no larger than the Minikahda sign. Councilman Schneider stated when the petitioner chose to build on that site, they were aware of the code requirements for signs. Mr. Inman stated the reason for applying for the variance is to try and obtain more business so they can start paying the taxes again. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated almost every business owner in town could make such a case and did not feel this was an exception. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MBSTINQ OF FBBRIIARY 12. 1990 PAGE 9 11. RECEIVE MINUTES OF THE CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 1990• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Cable Television Commission meeting of January 18, 1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 12-1990 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION LOT SPLIT. L.S. #89-01 TO SPLIT OFF THE SOUTH 122 FEET OF LOT 4, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 22 TO CREATE A SEPARATE PARCEL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1501 RICE CREEK ROAD N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this property abuts Rice Creek Road on the south and Camelot Lane on the north. She stated the petitioner is proposing to subdivide this lot in approximately equal halves with an east/west lot line. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission recommended approval subject to four stipulations which she outlined. Councilman Schneider stated he noted the property is for sale and asked if potential buyers are informed of the lot split. Mr. Nyberg, the petitioner, stated there are stakes there in the ground. Councilman Schneider asked if the drainage would be a problem if the property is filled. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated one of the stipulations is that a grading and drainage plan be submitted for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. He felt that the drainage would not be a problem as Harris Pond has a pipe that drains into an open ditch to Highway 65 and eventually to Rice Creek. Councilman Schneider stated at some point in time, someone will probably have to pay for a storm sewer system on that back lot. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 12-1990, with the following stipulations attached as Exhibit A: (1) The certificate of survey shall indicate a suitable building elevation for connection to the City sewer. The elevation shall be reviewed and approved by the PubZic Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit; (2) A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted with the building permit application for approval by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit; (3) The driveway location must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of a building permit; and (4) The petitioner shall execute appropriate utility easements as requested by the City or by the Cable Television company. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TINa OF F88RIIARY 12. 1990 PAa$ 10 Councilman Billings stated the depth of the lots to the east are 130 feet and asked why this lot was only 122 feet. Mr. Nyberg stated this lot even if it is not as deep. because of trees that are sure they were on his lot. is much wider than the ones to the east, He stated he did not want it any deeper located in the back and wanted to make Councilman Billings stated one of the stipulations was for the petitioner to obtain an easement for cable television and wondered why this had not been done since there has been sufficient time since this item was before the Planning Commission. Ms. Dacy stated staff felt this was the petitioner's responsibility to contact the cable television company. Councilman Schneider asked if other easements, other than cable television, would be required. Ms. Dacy stated they would not. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. RESOLUTION NO. 13-1990 ESTABLISHING A WATER CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR THE SUMMER OF 1990: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated with the recent two year drought and the apparent extension into this year, as well as the placement of two of the City's major producing wells into an emergency standby position, it appears that the summer water demands may not be satisfied. He stated lawn sprinkling is a major summer demand that severely impacts the City's water production, therefore, it appears necessary to implement a lawn sprinkling ban for this summer and notify residents as soon as possible. Mr. Flora stated this resolution would establish a lawn sprinkling/watering ban daily during the period of 12:00 p.m. (noon) to 8:00 p.m. He stated this conservation program could be amended or terminated depending on the summer conditions. He stated this ban would not apply to gardens or car washing at this time. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 13-1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 14-1990 T4 ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR TWO (2� 2-WHEEL DRIVE DIESEL TRACTORS: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated funds have been appropriated for these two diesel tractors and it is recommended Council adopt this resolution to advertise for bids. FRIDL$Y CZTY COIINCIL ME$TING OF FBBRIIARY 12. 1990 PAGE 11 MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 14-1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 15-1990 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: CORRIDOR MAINTENANCE PROJECT NO. 199• Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this is the second year the City is requesting bids to maintain the University Avenue Corridor and two segments of East River Road from 60th to Mississippi and either side of Osborne Road. He stated this project involves picking up paper and cutting the grass on the shoulders and in the medians. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 15-1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. RESOLUTION NO 16-1990 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF WELL NO. 3,__ PROJECT NO. 203• Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated this project involves lowering the pump another 50 feet for Well No. 3 in order to allow it to be put back on line for this summer's water production. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 16-1990. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 17. E�'''ABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR 1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BIACK GRANT FUNDS• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the public hearing for the 1990 Community Development Block Grant Funds for February 26, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 18. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 7.04 7 05 7.07 AND 7.09 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER: Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated in regard to this proposed ordinance that under Section 7.04, subsection 2, line 10, the words "in summary" should be added after the word "twice". He stated this was inadvertently omitted when the ordinance was typed. Mr. Hunt stated, basically, this Charter amendment would approve adoption of the budget by resolution, rather than by ordinance. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MESTINa OF F88RIIARY 12. 1990 PAQE 12 MOTION by Councilman Billings to set the public hearing on this proposed Charter amendment for March 12, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated it may be advisable to include language to the effect that the City would comply with the State statute, as amended, from time to time. Mr. Hunt stated the changes proposed in this ordinance relate to the State statute, as well as to the City's own budget process. He stated the Commission tried to maintain the Charter's original intent and still accommodate the changing requirements of State law regarding publication of the levy. Mr. Herrick asked if the Commission considered what they wish to propose as far as the mill limits. Mr. Hunt stated this is being handled on a separate basis and it will be considered at the February 26 meeting. He stated he has prepared eight scenarios for the Charter Commission to review. 19. �PPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to concur with the following appointment by the City Manager: Paul Hansen Position Accountant Range 3 Exempt Starting Salarv $2,022.86 per month Starting Date Feb. 13, 1990 Replaces New Position Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. CLAIMS• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claims No. 30437 through 30761. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 21. LICENSES• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1dE$TING OF FBBRIIARY 12, 1990 PAGE 13 22. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as submitted: JMG Contracting 5141 Abbott Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55410 Phase I- 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6, 500. 00 Herrick & Newman 205 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Month of January, 1990 .......$ 2,861.10 Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecutor for the Month of November, 1989. ......$ 7,655.00 Services Rendered as City Prosecutor for the Month of December, 1989. ......$ 8,019.00 AEC Engineers & Designers 51Z - 11th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 Phase I- 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 (Inspection Services) Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 367.00 HNTB 6700 France Avenue South Suite 260 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Design of 1.5 MG Elevated Reservoir at Locke Park, Project No. 196 Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19,500.00 FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MESTINa OF F$BRIIARY 12. 1990 pAGE 14 Civic Center Remodeling Pay Application No. 15 Through December 31, 1989. . . . . . . . . . $220,814.87 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of February 12, 1990 adjourned at 9:03 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: IOUSNG and REOEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1 COMMISSiON MEMBERS: uw�NCE coM�xs, c.�uww� �ur►� Me� �rwe�+u sc��SEI wAL?'�! ItAiYUisEN .IOMN MEYO! CITY OF FRIDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: sIISJ�,T: February 22, 1990 William Burns, City Manager � Jock Robertson, Executive Director of HRA Proposed Northco Phase III Development of 2.4 Acre Loop-back Site Northco is proposing the purchase and development of the 2.4 acre site between University Avenue frontage road and University Road immediately south of 73rd Avenue. The proposed development is for an 18,400 sq. ft., one block, one story, commercial and office building. The anchor tenant would be a branch of Western State Bank of St. Paul (see attached profile of A. williams Sands, Chairman of the Board). Northco proposes a spring start of the proposed center with additional tenants envisioned as a restaurant, printing, computer sales, insurance offices, etc. Bruce Carlson, Northco Executive Vice President, estimates that the total cost of construction of the project will be approximately $850,000. The site has wet soil that will have to be removed and backfilled for an estimated cost of $70,000. In addition, the site wi12 have tc be elevated a minimum of 2 ft. for proper drainage at an estimated cost of $25,000. The contractor, Krause Anderson, estimates that with normal soil conditions, site preparation costs would be in the neighborhood of $6,000. The developer is not aware of any similar soils problem on the previous Northco Business Park site or on the old Carter Day plant site. The concept of the project is in keeping with preferences of the City Council at the time that a rezone request or a special use permit request for a service station was under consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council in 1989. At the December 14, 1989, meeting, the HRA recommended that the City Council set up a short-term economic development district for the purpose of assisting this project with a soil correction qrant. This grant is to be in the form of a pay-as-you-go revenue note for an amount not to exceed the $70,000 required for the soil correction work. Preliminary estimates indicate that this would be approximately the first 2 years of taxes. Therefore, this TIF district could be retired in 3 or 4 years, at the discretion of the City Council. JR:ls M-90-122 EXECUTIVE piRECTOR: .IOCK ROSERTiON •t� 1 uNfVE11SITY AYE. ie 1 Z) 611-�46 FIIIDLEY, �IN s64�! EXT. 1 17 EXHIBIT XI-A BOUNDARIES OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT N0. 10 NORTHCO PHASE III AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED FEBRUARY 26, 1990 P.I.N. 11-30-24-31-0002 Tract A of Registered Land Survey #78 XI-A-1 Ll'� � � i; � �. , , i � N « : � r Y EXHI$IT XI—B BOUNDARY MAP , OF � � � � TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 10 . . . . • • • ^r'/'rG 'r�/��/ L� WI�.. • /�":/ ' A/^ �'� ' .i r r-I � �. ! � � �J � ► !'. � � I > � Y� �ti i i r �1 4 / / ii�l1�/C�"it•1TV 4�/iA�l/C �iG � f♦��vr r�„!7.►� �/ r+♦ e..,�vL. �.�.. / �..__ �� .._..�— � wrse� .._. � re�n�ati asr�e . . .ae�o • �� '.., . r�� ' �• ��.�wrN• • ��`,.� y,• � � � .www� �� 1� ` ;�4�� r� � � � � � �ii � � i I • ' � !�� + _ r• � � f� �� j � i�, rJ♦ _ � i� � �1 . / t�, ' - _ � i � � , • �� t• � • � �! � •i • ��' •e � o� • r,""a`* �� I N t i � •..�.�. ' �� N ` �.yaoo�i ..w : s:�tcs � � � �.� .�: t J . � � �; . �� . . . • �� . " ' ^... « , .- •` : � ' • h � . "" � i o �� = -� • �� C� • . y ; � f W tt w � O �? � t�� I � �� I � �r :�� 4�'� �`► � / � i s t � � �' I �. .,. � � ' I .�.�•. r.. � �` ! �3`;• �,._� �-,rs aw. �1....� + f �' ^ ' ,,}� � ••�...�---_.� � � S ' � � O , �`' � ^%�� 4 I ( I ja V' � � � � � w� i � � �� '� �� , ` �� : � � IJ ` � Z� � � ' � � � . �s 1� � e ' � � :c � � . � 1 . �� _ � _ :,, , ,...,`_ S •� �! I ►IR::.e-�� r �s /�" � � I t o� �:- ' � • ''� ` z i s � �=i•� i � s c ::ar1 j m 'i � il � i� � . � � el �:'r, '^ � 4 ��r� �w ,^.'� aG�'�+`!y.�� .��". V�}/� ..... ; ( ,+�, t{ 'il �.. .�:.�� I.II r =u . w. � �' �� r -�.�ft% . e' � � a � : � �w�.� r • •, �r"TT7 � r � 1 I • � �� r `� �— �� •�..(�:•f � � ��.�,�,� Y� �� Mti rr /r.� . � � � � �. 4 r * ^ �—• �' M�w�1�M�r��M ( 1� �� 1 � � «� • • ��_i � � t% � j� �.� �r N � �[5* '� -� � � `* ( ^ 9 :i:� _� _ -� • �� » �� — , :• . — .� -� . � .- • r� '= � t�� `� � = 1 r `' y�;: N � t 1 .j r � � ii e 1{ �� i � ;� �� . r � ca:•.:�'s ' ' �.w�. ► �� i a �1 i� k{�1 t ,� !`; ` " � �� f�� * � I� � ' .� • � �i}" �^� J R � —: �= : t\:�� / � ' ��w �w = � :� �:i�i � �1 I ? I 1• }. .1 � t � — ; rT: 11'i �� s 3 � �� :•rKe' 1=� t `~� ` ( • '' r'~ � � ._. • _.. � � ••••. eT=I il L INDa1 �Ai r l INY.i� �iL 110�! "� L t '~ , � •� . �, � . �� z � � t; i � �€ R ` XI—B—i 6 A 4 4; �� i� EXHIBIT XI-C CASH FLOW ANALYSIS 12-Jan-90 CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA NORTHCO PHASE III DEVELOPMENT ��THCO --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ORIGiNAL ESTIMATED ESTIMATED LESS AVAILABLE # OF TAX TAX TAX ADMIN TAX YEARS DATE CAPACITY CAPACITY INCREMENT EXPENSES INCREMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0 6/90 9,695 9,695 0 0 0 0.5 12 /90 9,695 9,695 0 0 0 1.0 6/91 12,710 41,250 0 0 0 1.5 12 /91 12,710 41,250 0 0 0 2.0 6/92 16,661 42,488 13,950 698 13,253 2.5 12 /92 16,661 42,4$8 13,950 698 13,253 3.0 6/93 21,842 43,762 12,623 631 11,992 3.5 12 /93 21,842 43,762 12,623 631 11,992 4.0 6/94 28,633 45,075 10,714 536 10,178 4.5 12 /94 28,633 45,075 10,714 536 10,178 5.0 6/95 37,537 46,427 8,036 402 7,634 5.5 12 /95 37,537 46,427 8,036 402 7,634 6.0 6/96 49,208 47,820 4,346 217 4,128 6.5 12 /96 49,208 47,820 4,346 217 4,128 7.0 6/97 64,509 49,255 0 7.5 12 /97 64,509 49,255 0 8.0 6/98 84,567 50,732 0 8.5 12 /98 84,567 50,732 0 9.0 6/99 110,862 52,254 0 9.5 12 /99 110,862 52,254 0 10.0 6/00 145,332 53,822 0 ------------------------------------ 99,339 4,967 94,372 ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY YEAR CONSTRUCTED YEAR ASSESSED YEAR TAXES PAYABLE CURRENT TAX CAPACITY RATE (PAY 1989 RATE ASSUMED; 1990 UNAVAILABLE) INFLATION ADMIN EXPENSE 9,695 1.310936 850,000 41,250 1990 1991 1992 0.977560 CASSERLY MOLZAHN & ASSOCIATES XI-C-1 3.000� 5.000$ EXHIBIT XI-D "BUT FOR" ANALYSIS Northco is proposing to purchase and develop the 2.4 acre site between the University Avenue frontage road and University Road immediately south of 73rd Avenue. This parcel is located in an area in which the City has actively promoted development and redevelopment. The new facility will provide approximately 18,400 square feet of commercial and office space. In addition, approximately 25 employment positions will be relocated into the City, thereby providing additional consumers for existing retail and restaurant facilities. The project will also add over $850,000 of additional market valuation to the City's tax base. In order to proceed with the development, substantial soils correction are required. The need for tax increment is to assist in this increased cost and help provide the public assistance which makes this development possible. Without tax increment assistance, the project as proposed on this site would not be economically feasible and would not proceed in the foreseeable future. XI-D-1 1D 1E EXHIBIT XI-E ESTIMATED IMPACT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DZSTRICT NO. 10 ON OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS IMPACT ON TAX BASE ------------------ TAX CAPACITIES DISTRICT -------------------------------- AS % OF ENTITY TAX BASE ORIGINAL ESTIMATED CAPTURED TOTAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Fridley 25,799,307 9,695 32,648 22,953 0.089% County of Anoka 149,612,820 9,695 32,648 22,953 0.015% ISD #16 18,025,730 9,695 32,648 22,953 0.127% IMPACT ON TAX CAPACITY RATE --------------------------- CURRENT POTENTIAL TAX CAPACITY TAX CAPACITY $ OF TAX RATE ENTITY RATE TOTAL INCREMENT INCREASE * --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Fridley 0.12492 13� 2,867 0.011% County of Anoka 0.27425 28e 6,295 0.004% ISD #16 Q.516Q7 53% 11,845 0.066% Other 0.06232 6� 1,430 0.97756 100% 22,438 * Assumes the construction would have occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Financing District. If the construction is a result of Tax Increment Financing, the impact is $0. XI-�-1 SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA: BUILDING CONSTRUCTION: ANCHOR T .F�iiANT : BAY SIZES: PARKING SPACES: SPRINKLER: mm984nor.mlp DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVF.MENTS Approximately 2.39 a�res. I8,400 square feet rentable. ., a One-story block building with brick veneer, aluminum frame windows with insulated glass. Pitch and gravel built up roof over metal deck. Post and beam over on grade slab. Rooftop HVAC units.. Common bathroom area, trash enclosure. Western Bank. 3,500 square feet. Additional bays: 8Q0-3,000 square feet. Approximately 124 spaces. No system required. 1F � + � � � � � ., m ... O 0 0 � 1 � ti � r d �C $ � � e � � no � �� y � � C� ��Ly C � �` L C� C C� C�S � �� = v�� .�a �'ep �� .�� !+ '�� w � ��+' � � O � C U t v.� .�t w''� .�. ►. �� C �� t�, � �� ~ �"�t� � � w � �ed ��• �`�i.00 � a3C. �� ,p� c �.o��'� ��g�3��E�� a�o,��'� �� ii a �E. °q m � �,� � o e� o H.o,� e.� yi� .°.,' � >,� � �, �s 3 � $ � ��'y-'.�o •� �.� T�•� Ev�,00,�'� �.5•° o�c�� , ° o E " p� �, �'i CQ C�.� y• � t�A ^� C� '.7 OD f+ � b. 4. rr ' �� y � L .�'� �� q�� y�� E�� g�°� �� p°~ �E ° "y.a� �� .' ' o��y � ��$ ��i�� y� C� O�yC� Y Ce� C C$6? C� � ��'Ctl1 O� �� E q C.'�" � � � .,� .� td �, U � � '^ N � a � � � G �a.Lc�'�'�vao�`4`-3��,��`�,'�°°:� �`�� u� L'�°o ,v.b' �_�V�°��E��--�'c,�O��,�°.c�$.�,� �v° ;vL'�'��3 �v�� .� �. �yy�$� �o�u=�=€��O�Ga'S.s��y,g��.,,� � � ' ''.� V 1 � ., � � �.� � '�v�' �'._.°: � ° E�.��3 ��'��'.�3�3��` �� sx �� o+ s� 3tlVNS NHOf A9 01011d w � � O = 0 ��o � �� ;o�a L 1p v Y �, �m � N«m� .�+ � 7 EN,- � ` � V —m � 3 m�� a3 E� u��v�i �O�.�o.� � �.. -� n� � � �� E�� y�.5 �." �rS � ��,.� � � �j„c�G °' E, r E y e � ° a 3 • � 3b�� a� �n C T N C y •�.. � � � y � b9 �+ � .l. T � G' y .... .r � 3�c��yd��h �tQ�Ot p,y � C � �, `' ,��"' � �C�c°��a��'� v � a� y,a y r"�" •� �m�° � � �� ...,� u o c w 69 �i L�.� b�"� y tN � I fA N 41 Q �� U� 4'� 1 L Qi � � y� .T � � ��., �•^�, �'�.�� u�Q� 3 ��L �°��° e� �$ a,� a°,�� g c ¢� E � � •� .� 3� 3 �'b >�� °•� � •y ° °° � y � � n' � > 2 s � y � � 2 o�� a�i��c��'� �;�y��3..�c� a,��`�v��>'�� ?�'�� v .r .. ,o.� :a��w.,°.`R -�� G'��EE� �Q�a��a•�.sa'� ��a ��'� orJ c'� �•� �',ti^ �., v� � �'v� v Q�C � • �; �'Z°� �`$�w.� °' �j.,,, � ��'g'��yQ.P? �.R�{ � � �� c0"" m� '�, �.� s� °� �.� Gp �Y'� O�OV� �, 'J ~ ai `� � � OQ � � � � w � � y '•� �� y� �� -� -� �, �� . � � �.�� a�� .�.� �-:, � � � -�� . � �� _... ��'e�� e�i.� 3•�'�L'�,$V `�° �.0 4v'�-S �a g ��.�'� a -'� oU�� .� _: . �e+i`t5 �^ � us �+' �'� °3 °�,�� `" �,Lg,� �"� � `�,s �'� '0 3 . . �°O ,� '� o � � � 3 � � x ,�, ,� � . °� • � '� � � E� �'v, ...� � � q- , y, „ yd , : �� o� ��o� v �3 .� � ..., a. .� '� � ..� �' ... � � ��:��`��.�.�� a� �� w�� .��:�� . �=� � � �..., a x . .��} ,:: � .c-� t�ti:, s ' �.,..d� � � ��. �� 3 �� `E g � g ��►'�� $ � - ,� �'',� � � " ` �� `..t' v� � �.. � �,,�±� :� - ��,.�g�..�pJ�� 4� � r�w� �� :3�Ff � '�^�^ � $t� �� .� � 'V-p ��- � �� { � � � a � � �a �� .�� ._�� ` ��•}.� � .. � L� 3 � � '�� _.., a�� -... � � �� 3 � � �� . _.�. � �} :E �� [ _�' � ` � � ' � �� .�-� - � � � .. ;� :� :� �� d � � � � � � � �� :�:� .� �d' --�,. �� ' �. �. � . �� `� ='� � � � � :" :, � � ..-;_ �.� �� -Z •a ��4 �� : L , � � .� � . � � �� „,�� : � - �_• - ;�,•< -�„'; e _w . - _ . �_. _ � :a_. . . . �, . . ��, . .:,, ; � �■�t �G � � � � � � � � � � I� � � � �� o � ~ ^ N �- � � �� anv c� � � � � �� /4' � �� ; 'I. ; � i � �. � �' .. - _ , r ' � _�- � +r` �,f s,��; ;,;.,,.. �,. ..,,� � �c!� � �� '/:�.. — ■ �� v. � `f=-.. s , t� � — I � - - � i — � � — � � ' � �, � � �;I Z �/i G _ V � Y Y � � � cc � Z � 01 QI �I M n O V 2 � CG � Z � I T CD �� 1H 3 'S — ,� ;�=5.�' ; „ _ �� f � .,��I .1�fi,, ' _ � �, .,..�i. �, �i n � � � I I' � � � � �i � r - � � � =�� ,'�� ;�'� r� -- _ � � W�i `'�� .'� rjqil, �Tiri r ��Ii1�• �► i�iu; ' —� �' s � - re_ le��;i� �,� .�� i�; �;`�� : rjfa� I ''�l �'��I �� _�� i' -1 11 �,� : � �.� !� tii �� ' f,�. .1 r h k ,� p !S y � :) lial� � '��!; - ,� � �, , _ ,, ' ° �+ �'_ I ; "`= : \ ,� , � � ,- I �( �� ` ` , � `'�:+ } � � r ��,i`�j � � � 6 � � �� . j!�. ,.� , ��` , �qAIII , ; .� �rr �'. � ,�;�mm�mm � � �� z �� i � � �i � .,, ,�, = r.;y�fi �' �irn� � ; . ;� i, , � �t;;.�� rl � � , ��t�L' � �� - . �I�;� �'�� '�� !/', � ��It'��i 3� �� _� ■"� � � %'; ., �� ' ' _ �11 rr'� � - � j v : ,. � _�i .� =� ;,�:" + I:' � � ►�. i �k� ; �` r ° r�� -r� e� ' �� a �i � � i ��i :�=�� -�� : :� ,,� �,.,::: �� !:�i-.A�' �.� .Ty�e �e��{ nliPlflm } ! �',� �� —� � , _ ��I ti � �'�" =!:rfR r ii„ - � � Z ic . � � =�i I t V 3 � ;. si ' � e ,� � , __�:�� ,��7 ; . ,. ...:,, . . �t� , - I � + � I� ' �,- ij,'�; �'� `� � � �� T p � �: 1� � :'!1!��.!il�i.' �'�i 'i�i�' �° I U !!!�i=' +;� _ a� �� ii��_�- - �; �(�'+ �� : !, ' �! �� I �_ -�� i "11 ' � L � �!I � � •� �,,,,,� � I. I,�=. � � r, : � � �� ,i � -o �,�. , ; ,,_ �_+ ; I; ' '; j � _ _ ,-;.,�;,�� __ �� , . , .. -- �, .., �:� _ ,i,��;.1�� 1j: t i il�l '►.c��l�� l:l�,, . ' ::�r . : , ��,,•�f' i — � �� • n�� -, r.� —� � _�.�� ,. ��_�w t , _ � � : 1 �L i, � : � �"�'�i �� i . i �� " 7 � � 1 � 1�� HnPil u o�; , ,. Sy�!Id�� ir6e�: � � .�,; -� � ' I � _ �� e�� ,,„.- � �� .I� ' �.� � . ji��: i� i �j ,� —�/ , �� `.r , i, �� • . i,�h 1J ' .7RTH;;O �Rt'URR?It1N i�-U:l-83 f.:5'��!; i�'1=. '�!{„".7`�' - �P.?D�Y �.SItES� Cfl1TER ;i-�-89 18,�00 SII.Fi _ ---__--�== �-� S�i,T. D=5'P.::':01: ===WJTS � IWTEP.ii� t.ABOR SG65 TDitr ODST:S� S:TE CQSfiS �3EL! CDST � d E 5000 C�lERA: CAt".J;'IOtG 3.',00(� lo,(q� 6�,000 S1:,t�0 f6.t�3 2B,Bo6 &'+,3� � 2100 SITF .^R='T� ;D`1f�!7IOk :5,00f� 0 fO.U(� p 0 0 �Pb E1fCAVa'.:4N 9`.+, 90(� 9�, 9CK� f.`,.:1 9`,y 90q Q p 2`.A6 �ir=RR,^�-" I P cMJNHf� 72, (�00 1.', 000 f0. 6:, 1:, 000 0 0 260G i5t4W:; FWVIN6 2�,3�0 26,:�0 fl.�i3 26,:�0 � �' 270p CAK'� ^UaA3 IG,(q0 10,000 f0.54 IG,O(K� 0 0 :750 COUt;. SiD=1YYLK 7,9.`: 7,?.`fi f0.43 7,9`.�i G 0 2800 LAf6l5/G_Alrlh'�S - A 1 y000 I:p000 f0.&' 15,000 � 0 3200 COI�P_T 9`I�,M'OE IN :�0 0 p sO.M� p 0 Q ��^�_i�q�c � 51,081 51,081 �.'•.�8 0 �I,OSS 0 42(K� W.TT IiRo^9F1RY BRICiS `A�71P �,712 f'sw 0 59�712 � 5100 STRt�T. M,�7i'L; JOSSTS/�CK 60 369 2:, 361 81, i�0 :�. µ 0 81, 7� 0 �(K� MIS: .!t i�S i, BM� 1, B(K� f0. i� � � i, BCK� U 610p RDUfi� CRR:'cf.TP.Y 5, Op0 6, 000 11, 000 �• b� 0 ,1, 000 � 0�''00 N71kAR� P f0.(K� 0 6 U 720U itlStLA�:Ok 1� 9'�,`0 Q fO.OP 0 0 P 7500 rRSTIC 51i=: pppc �6�438 46,438 f:.5_' 0 �538 � 760(1 FLAS�Ifro : ��!r'TtY_ 0 f0.00 0 �, 0 0 78(K� i�i'L STU �iAN r� 56, 3S7 `b, 397 f?. 07 0 .,o, 397 0 .'900 C�:.tk ;�R�NTS 1, 87r :, B?` f0.10 0 1.87:, � 61t�0 fE'ftL' tYJCiR�/fft'M�C 2,.�,45 �0 4 3,46i f0.19 0 :�,;E•`+ a 82(K� YQ�I: Il� P.S 2� 145 S.°t1 0 2, 66:, fU. i4 0 .', b6•`+ 83t�C+ St':�.a: �DP.S 0 0 sO.M� 0 0 0 B�IM A:UM d: P.:ES 2E, 8(Kti �, 800 f 1.57 0 Z8, B00 0 8.`AU i�U!^. H.f�C�:.S p U fO.M, 0 0 0 67tK� FIt�:S.� elaR'JNRP� 4,500 7:0 t1 .`h?..''0 s0.2B � °+,�'� � 88M,r 6! R:� pkL '.i:A: i!h 0 0 fU. A(� 0 � 9P`.,C� 6YG. LP.T:: : ST SZCIS �2..'�8 42.248 f2.� � ��246 U 4.''eU 571k:x� SYS�EM 0 0 f0.(K� 0 � 0 0 43t10 .�'""-•4�f C i IL� krJah: 5� � °�� f0. P3 Q �� (' n 95iCK� �; I:'.iL' i Rr�7TMEh i :.� 2.i(` � :�:`.A f0.1' 0 'ti 2`A 0 96:,t� Rca::_Eh^ r:OQRING 0 G f0.(q 0 0 0 9e80 CaR�� IN3 2��tK� :44M� tC.:3 C 2,4CK� 0 '9300 G�qlk"INE 3,000 �,0(K� f0.16 0 3,M+0 0 9?50 WNI_ � CO'��F NIC 0 P f�.tK� 0 Q �' 16180 TOSi�i COM�'A�ir'=-rTS s",1.`A 1,� 4,� t0.26 0 q�7=:+ � 1MOU I.�. D=ViCcS NIC 0 C� fG.00� 0 0 0 1050C� EIP� EX':kw::S=F.S 2T5 � 0 30Q s0.0. 0 300 0 108GG TO:=: ^. ",.�SSORi=S S, 3�G �OS 0 S� .."`.� f0. f0 U l� l�F., Q 11870 L�?tk D^..�: E�u KIC ' 0 0 s0.0^ U 0 � S�(KK� �R'R;DP.S N!� 0 0 fU.00 0 0 0 1:�cXk� F�LMfr:N; iK I$200 0 � s0.p0 Q 0 Q 1�7a� r:'.f;,:. 6i3O(tp 67,Cq0 f,i.64 0 6i,MK� � 15;00 FIRc F'kOi�CiIOi+ 0 0 �•� � 0 n 16(+(�U =! c�rr;�,,�� 31�8.�`U 3;�B50 fl.?3 0 31�8.i`0 0 SIT= :.iC1, INE 10,w0 3U,:`.� f�.56 10,2.�` 0 P St1FT0iP_ ..................... 113.134 24*�Q 68'�F.+: 80�,�T6 f4.i..`i0 206.3!1 994�16$ 0 LAAOR AURCc"H 45.0000'� 1:,066 f0.60 2}8.�i.? B.:f4 0 SA�� .�'.S TtiX - I N'� � 0 f0. (K� 0 0 0 �t LIR'r IkoJ2. O.SEOPx 5,76: f0.:3 1,073 �R9� 0 fC.Dt� P.iSt; ; tl�& Ik5 tBY Of�ER) ai2iix 905 f0.� :`.,P 7:t� 0 Hi:I�INC:::RM,:T 0.70aK 5.6C3 f0.3!� 1.44ti 4,:99 0 L��S= P�u 0.00(Kn: G fP.(K� 4 0 0 � � Wp;. in soft cast 0 �.M� � � 0 SUSTOi�1' .............................................................. 8w::'7 f44.69 215,93� 610�346 0 COh7fiA�'Dr:: r� 4. (K►R ......................................... .iy 891 S:. i5 & 4� Pi, 4f 4 0 ��_ 7DiA� '�,'3T ............................................................ G�i,SoB f16.�9 .�.�O,AQ7 634,7� 0 n:i` :cMk1N" :!:'ROV iliDfliMP.;_`S: S�.fT. NiliE TOR� 0 tESTERN Bi1M! �L� 3,500 f7..`A 26,2`.A Sl.ti3 26,'�` Sa��C i�' ONRfC: 14, 9(K� f7.54 i l l, 7`.d� i6.4' 1] 1, ?5U --- TffTR: �'3? IN(�'LCIIt� i�L0Up11L�S............ i8,+1(�0 f7..�i0 13B,tKq fl.`� 2205407 634,70:+ l36, � HOIISING i REDEVELOPI�IENT �IITHORITY 1dE8TING, DEC. 14, 1989 pI►GE _2 take the additional time to get this proposal developed evaluated. / Mr. Robertson stated staff has informed the three er developers of this new proposal, and they have acquiesc o not attend this meeting in order to give the City more ti o evaluate this fourth proposal. He stated he anticipated is would take at�least 3-4 months. He suggested the HRA t e discussion on this item. MOTION by Mr. Prairi , seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to table discussion of the oposals for redevelopment of the southwest quadrant of U' rsity and Mississippi. IIPON OICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CBaIRPER80N BCHN!►BEL RED THE MOTION CliRRIED IINl�TIMOIISLY. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CONCEPT OF PAY-AS-YOU-GO TIF ASSISTANCE TO PHASE III NORTHCO BUSINESS PARK: Mr. Robertson stated the HRA members received an outline of the proposal by Northco Business Park for Phase III of the development on the southeast quadrant of 73rd Avenue/University Avenue. As shown on agenda page 2-E, Northco has purchased and begun redevelopment on the old Carter Day facility, characterized as Phase II of the new plat, which is between Carter Day and the frontage road. Mr. Robertson stated this particular proposal is for approximately a 2 1/2 acre site within the turnback loop between the frontage road and University Avenue. The proposal is for an 18,000 sq. ft., one story commercial/office building with the anchor tenant being a branch of Western State Bank. Mr. Robertson stated that regarding the soil conditions, the site is low and has wet soil that would have to be removed and backfilled. The estimate for that cost is $70,000. The site would also have to be raised a minimum of 2 feet for a cost of approximately $25,000. Mr. Robertson stated he has met with Mr. Bruce Carlson, Executive Vice President of Northco. Mr. Carlson has given staff some preliminary construction estimates. Mr. Carlson is at the meeting with some more detailed drawings, and he will qive a brief outline summary of his proposal and answer any questions the HRA miqht have. Mr. Robertson stated the pay-as-you-go concept would be the same concept staff proposed for the SBF Cinemark development where essentially the HRA would qive the grant, not at the time of the certificate of occupation of the building, but at the time the taxes are received which might be over a 2-3 year period. There 1K 1L HOUSING � REDEVELOPKENT !►IITHORZTY ISEBTIIJG, DBC. 14, 1969 PAGE 3 is no risk to the HRA, and it helps Northco with soil correction work. Mr. Carlson stated Northco has been redeveloping the old Chicago Northwestern site. They have been concerned about the possible development of this turnback site in front of their site because they wanted to hopefully encouraqe a quality development that would enhance their business park. The City recently wrestled with the Phi2lips PetroZeum Company proposal for the possible use of this site for another filling station. He stated that from a planning standpoint, it was something neither the City nor Northco was interested in seeing go onto this site. Mr. Carlson stated Northco has been working with Mr. A. William Sands, Chairman of Western State Bank, and several other tenants to develop and design a building as a one-story business center. They hope to have tenants such as insurance offices, mortqage companies, perhaps some food, dental, medical, travel agency, real estate, printing. Mr. Carlson stated the entrance to the project would be off 73rd Avenue and off the frontage road in front of the industrial park. The building essentially orients itself to the two main streets, University Avenue and 73rd Avenue. The site will have adequate parking. The main problem is the poor soil conditions. Mr. Carlson stated that with the HRA's assistance, they hope to be in a position by the spring of 1990 to go through all the necessary processes, get the project financed, and commence construction. He stated this is not a very large project, but a project they feel is very important for their business park. Ms. Schnabel asked why the site needs to be raised 2 feet. Mr. Carlson stated the site is like a dish and it has bad black soils. In order to get the building in the right location and to get good drainage, they need to raise the elevation of the site. Mr. Rasmussen stated this looks like a very good plan. Mr. Robertson stated one of the things the HRA is concerned about with any project is that it be a quality of development that is significantly different than the "run of the mill" building which might be built without financial assistance. Mr. Robertson stated Northco is getting ready to submit an application for a rezoning from manufacturing to commercial. Mr. Carlson stated they are not absolutely certain that this project even requires a rezoning, because the tenants may be business-oriented enough to fall under the M-2 zoning. They are doing the rezoninq mainly to have�the flexibility in the leasing. HOUSING i REDEVELOPMENT 11DTHORITY MBETII�TG, DBC. ll. 1989 PAGE 4 Mr. Robertson stated staff is recommending the HRA approve the project in concept and to authorize staff to start the mechanism to create an economic development district, give public notice, and have a public hearing before the City Council. That will take approximately 45 days from this point. O�! TION by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to approve the concept of "pay-as-you-go" TIF assistance to Phase III Northco Business Park, and to authorize staff to draft a development agreement and begin the process to set up an economic development district. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPBRBON BCHIdABEL DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIKODSLY. 3. CONSIDERATIVN OP' Y1,�►GA tujr�r � �.�xvr�.. �vn�L�y ,�.� � - Mr. Robertson stated that in August 1989, Mr. William Bu s had made a proposal to the HRA to consider adding e ctronic surveillance to the ramp to be in the form of both a TV amera and sound monitoring equipment. At that time, the HRA aut rized staff to advertise for bids and bring those bids back. aff received ane bid from Security World for a total of $10,97 . Mr. Robertson stated Tim Turnbull is at the eting to give any additional information needed. Staff is rec ending approval of the bid. Mr. Turnbull stated the HRA has had s eral discussions on this particular project, and he was at he meeting to answer any questions the HRA members miqht hav . He stated Security World is an excellent company. Security W ld and its subdivision, Access Control, is the company that pr ided the electronic security for the Municipal Center and t video security for the holding facility in the Police De rtment. The equipment met all the specifications. The co any has installed and done whatever training was necessary, and there have been no problems. This company has performed ery well under previous contracts and he would certainly reco end approval of the bid. OM TION by Mr. Ra ussen, seconded by Mr. Prairie, to receive the bid for the Par ng Ramp Security Surveillance System from Security WorZd, Inc., or a total of $10,973.00. IIPON A Vf�CE VOTE, ALL VOTZIdG !►YE, VICE-CHl�IRFERSON SCHNABEL DECLARED�THE MOTION CIIRRIED IINI�►NII�lOIISLY. � by Mr. Prairie, seconded by Mr. Rasmussen, to award the ract to Security World, Inc. (Access Control Tech.) for the ing Ramp Security Surveillance system. 1M � � cinroF fRlDLEY DATE: T0: FROM: SUBJECT: C411/1MUNITY DEVELQPMENT' DEPARTMENT MEMOR.AN DUM February 21, 1990 �William Burns, City Manager (�� Jock Robertson, Community DeveZopment Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Lisa Campbell, Planning Assistant Public Hearing for 1990 Community Development Block Grant The City Council established the public hearing for the 1990 CDBG allocation for February 26, 1990. Attached is the proposed distribution of the 1990 funds. The majority of the funds are being reserved for acquisition of Parcel 5 in the Riverview Heights project area. The remaining amount is proposed to be allocated for the Human Service programs. Anoka County is now requiring that $1,000 be allocated for its administrative services. The Human Resources Commission and the Planning Commission have recommended approval of the proposed allocations. RECOMMENDATION Anoka County has established February 28, 1990 as the deadline for submission of the 1990 CDBG requests. After the City Council closes the public hearing, this item appears later on the agenda for final approval. BD/dn M-90-111 PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF 1990 COMMi7NITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ALLOCATION 2A Proposed Project Distribution Comments (Fridley) Riverview $70,000 Purchase & Heights relocation of Parcel 5 property in the Riverview Heights floodplain (see map) Human $33,291 Services Administrative $ 1,000 Fee ___ _ ___ _._ _ ___ `j" '. �Z � � �'�' � ' ' " a o� o) ' ' . r . . . . �- b . • �� '' � �� , ` , �� : � 5 K�t1 q l 14 y 3q( : I _ 1 " - � ! � ; �� ET - � . � I�NGFELLOW ZB „ �. ;� _ ��'. - r;. .. `8� `� �' T o 3 g� � . �� .� .. � , .- y �, . 9 �` � •` � c '� �-� �� - r � y J ,� � �� y (�i ,� . „ � , � . � s . f (; '� F � � r .. d ' rf . �. .7� •' -- � ; e�� ' 3►',� ' � y - � �� o .� �� , - .f , . � : .. . ,� • J ` " +s j ° 0 3 �� q 351 � �� , � 7 ; < '. � / ,s + n c q �w� f. i9 • � j � � S : � r ,! 4 't i - ! � f � '.� � � p , .. _ _ — .. . ., :.,. y � •t � s. � o � .� � � _ � •� �. ,.,. .,... ,� '� � ., , � . ,,. �' '��:�� {`) ... _ , , -.. ,,, ,. ' :.. - . '9 �. . e Ylv w•'� '" '�� ) � rr� , ... \ • .:. T � � � r � �!r •f fi.�/I✓ T . 1 + . �.��. •` � �� ' �, •', , �' ' �j �/i.It Gi�:" f � , �,' c�'� I�!�i, 1 '� .' ° ~ -i l,�) �+ . : • cJ 7 . . ,� � � � � (!� �� 89 � �� ' J r �%� � � ...,.,.. : , . \ �`- �'��.:�: �" � i89� , � ;, ��j � -\ _ '� �; '��'� \ .,; . � � ' g� \ _ � . . • , ' O , ,'�.• �^ �.' � I � °� ',^ . � `� � , �•� , J :� � , � � <�. �• , . .L_ �,P, � �' `�.� � � ' � � �'� � -_ ' Q � .� � � � , ►_ ircel 7 • Acquireid i . ~ � � ' r� �' � � v"'�' � � ~i � y � ��` . _ , �� '� �'^� J ► ' _ ' �. �� 8�4 •� � � i ,� i�r rcel 9 - Acquirod in 1 ' :. E ; " .� ,, .� a "�! � �. ��• � - ` '" � �''•�_ `.' �,, - -►eGB ��,•�NP �r �t,, = r sci � � � � �' P` L + ircel 6- 1989 Proposed Acq�t(�it � �'� _ =i6�. "'. .�� \ � � _ , ., ,, � ��,� ,,� . � osed Ac uisition � q ��`��' �� • "� �� rcel 8- 1989 Prop q •� / . . ' ('' F'+ � �'-��. '- �'' `�) • �r�P % � �, e,,,, '., � QGO " � 0�c. , - . � y�•►� •a €,.,� '�'�►4 � o�. . �,�g�- Y �� ,^?y � � �,(I% s t \ - .� t'� " J'� %�a �� ti t . �� KEY N ` " ' ,, �� E"� � � �"j �� - y �' O � � } � Fy •. � Pr�viously AcquMed Property �� ' �� (*�) ~ ; � 5o a �a�t � � `�� 'Proposed Aequlsitions � �.' `, � �'� � � i?3 ° �`� . 78 aClty Psr rop�rty \ � ,_ �� ._ \ \ ,,,� � o " , , , � 3 � � �,. � � sca�•: t•=200, • � y , .S i � � `,'� :� £''�/ o � � ' ,\ ` � �- � � " ..l , � ` 34 MEM ORANDUM � oRnixAxc$ rto. 3A AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE BY AMENDING APPENDIB F TO PROVIDE FOR TH8 ADJIISTMENT C?F SALARIEB FOR THE MAYOR AND COIINCILMEMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BECTION 2.07 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: The annual salaries for the Mayor and Councilmembers during 1991 and subsequent years shall be as follows: Mayor $ 8,400.00 Councilmember-at-Large $ 6,900.00 Councilmember, Ward I $ 6,100.00 Councilmember, Ward II $ 6,100.00 Councilmember, Ward III $ 6,100.00 In addition, the Mayor and Councilmembers shall be entitled to the same benefits enjoyed by full-time authorized employees of the City. of Fridley. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK First Reading: February 12, 1990 Second Reading: Publication: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR � � cinr oF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Background C�11/iMUNI"fY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM February 22, 1990 ✓William Burns, City Manager �"� 4 Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Special Use Pera►it Request for Keith's Auto Body; 7570 Highway 65 N.E. At the August 28, 1989 City Council meeting, the City Council tabled action on the special use permit request until identification of the fee owner could be established. Further, the City Council directed staff to initiate a reasonable search to determine who the fee owner of the property is, and work with the petitioner to review areas of the violations with the existing Code and take action to enforce those items. The most significant Code violation was that the buildings on the property were not connected to the City's sewer system. As the City Council is aware, the City has proceeded to initiate the improvement process to provide sanitary sewer to the property. In fact, the petitioner Keith Poppenhagen, testified at the public hearing regarding the improvement. As to the ownership issue, the City Attorney has recommended that the City proceed to act on the special use permit and the variance request, without the signature of the fee owner of the property. A representative of the American Trustee Life Company, the fee owner of the property, refused to sign any applications or documents regarding this property, since they are trying to sell the property. Therefore, the City Attorney recommended that we proceed on these applications, but that the petitioner receives permission from the remaining partners of the partnership. Keith Poppenhagen has submitted this letter, and it is included in the packet. Analysis The City Attorney also recommended that the special use permit be granted, since it is for an existing use, and because by entering 4A SUP for Keith's Auto Body February 22, 1990 Page 2 into the special use permit, the City will have better control over the operation of the business. The City Attorney also recommends that the special use permit be limited to Keith's Auto Body, and not transferrable to another tenant. RECOMMENDATION The proposed use of an auto body repair shop in this location within an M-1, Light Industrial, district should not have an adverse impact upon the adjacent zoning or uses. Through the special use permit, the City can gauge improvement progress on the property. Progress has been made, since the sewer improvements are now underway. The following stipulations are recommended: 1. The special use permit shall be limited to Keith's Auto Body, and is not transferrable to another tenant. 2 . The special use permit .� =Y � "''� � ��`��` � __ r '. �'t � � , , -= , �. x s��ff � wi.'rl� a r+� , . � . �_ . : . ..,. �y the City Council be riecessary ue to lack of compliance by the petitioner, the item shall be scheduled for City Council consideration as soon as possible. 3. The connection to City sewer shall be completed within four months after provision of the sanitary sewer line to the property. 4. �� Hu#ldin,g ` Cod� i�provi�ments ` outi�.n+��`,�in Darrel Clark' s letter � of August 30, 1989 shall be "comp�eted by January 1, 1991. 5. ;��:�z�� in f�ant cf �e� buildinq sha11 b� tsmova,d 3��► �'��.;�� 1990, or a specia� use permit for `exterior storage must be requested and approved prior to July l, 1990. _ ,.: : 6. The .��apZ� a�le,at. f#�r� t�� a�to bodY ou��oox ,��r�,'t�. � vvs�r.raF�.�.a r� vs�- rsra aYV.. w�.�.svv i.�..'..� .P.' .�.��.�..,,...,r _.�� i�y' Code wi'thin on�e 'mor�th o� comple�ion" b� ��h�° �sarii connection work on the property. 7. The parking lot shall be hardsurfaced, striped, lined with concrete curb, and landscaping installed as per the staff recommended plan by January 1, 1992. BD/dn M-90-125 Virgil C. Herrick James D. Hoek Gregg V. Herrick or ca,� David P. Newman ��1�1�� QL ��fl,��ll�l� ATI'ORNEYS AT LAW MEMORANDUM T0: Barb Dacy o FROM: Virgil Herrick �T� �n DATE: December 12, 1989 RE: Keith's Auto Body - 7570 Hwy. 65 You have asked me for my opinion as to whether a special use permit and a variance can be granted to Keith's Auto Body located at 7570 Highway 65. A special use permit is to allow the continuance of an auto repair business on the property, and the variance is for the construction of a sign for this business. It is the usual procedure in the City of Fridley that a fee owner must sign applications for special use permits or variances. It is my understanding that the fee owner has refused to sign the applications. Because the special use permit is for an existing use, and because, by entering into a special use permit with Keith's Auto Body the City will have better control over the operation of the business, I wou�d recommend we proceed on the application without the signature of the fee owner. I would, however, request you obtain the signature of the partnership who is purchasing this property from the fee owner. This partnership consists of Ronald R. Hegle, Gerald W. Obraske, Michael D. Obraske, and Michael E. Thompson. A special use permit should be issued to Keith's Auto Body and it should be stated that it is not transferrable to any other successor. I would also recommend approving the variance on the sign for Keith's Auto Body. The sign permit should indicate that the sign is for Keith's Auto Body and may not be transferred to any other successor business without the express written approval of the City of Fridley. I also wish to emphasize that the procedure of allowing special uses or variances without the signature of the fee owner is only because of the special circumstances in this case, and should not be considered as a precedent for future applications. VCH:Idb Suite 205, 6401 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432, 612-571,3850 . � 4C To: Barb Dacy FYom : Kr�fft Inc . Date: Ferruary 12, 1990 Re: Special use permit and sign variance at 7570 Highway 65 In regards to Lhe special use permit for Keith's Auto Body. The partners trying to purchase the property at 7570 Highway 65 N.E. have no objections to either the special use permit or the variation for the sign. The partnership trying to buy the property listed is called KMMR Inc. The partners are as follows: Ronald R. Hegle, Michael E. �nonpson, Michael D. Obraske, And Keith R. Poppenhagen. Thank You KI�II�gt . Inc . , D�� / %�� : �`�` �� -- . � FRIDLSY CITY COIINCIL l[EETING OF �DaOBT Z8. 1989 P�GB 6 Councilman Billings stated some precedent has been set the past and felt the ordinance needs to be reviewed, howeve , he would not necessarily go along with the 50$. MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to qrant V iance Request, VAR �89- 12, to increase the required maximwn t coveraqe from 40$ to 47$ to allow the construction of additi al warehouse/manufacturing and office space at 7855 Rancher's ad N.E., by Cortron Corporation, with the following stipula ' ns: (1) the drainage plan shall be approved by City sta ,(2) underground sprinklinq shall be installed; (3) a la cape plan shall be submitted and approved by the City prior to ssuance of the building permit; (4) the Appeals Commission do not recommend further expansion on this site; and (5) a dum er enclosure shall be constructed, if necessary. Seconded y Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vate, all voting aye, or Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS• 2. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1989• A. ITEM FROM THE AFPEAIS COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 1. 1989: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP �89-08 TO ALLOW AN AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR GARAGE AT 7570 HIGHWAY 65 N E BY KEITH'S AUTO BODY• Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this is a request for a special use permit to allow a repair qaraqe at 7570 Highway 65 N.E. She stated the site is zoned M-1, liqht industrial, with R-4 zoning to the south, and M-1 to the west and north. She stated since 1983 there have been a number of auto repair garages operating from this site. She stated because there have been several changes in ownership since 1983, the City has had a difficult time in enforcing the code requirements. Ms. Dacy stated this spring Mr. Reith Poppenhagen contacted the City regarding operation of his auto repair qarage and he was advised that a special use permit for this repair garage was necessary. She stated some of the site improvements needed are paving, concrete curbs, landscaping, installation of sewer, and a cleanup of debris and materials stored in the rear. Ms. Dacy stated on May 17, 1989, the Planning Commission considered this item. She stated because of the disrepair of the property, the Commission was concerned if the buildinqs should be condemned. She stated staff reviewed the site and the structural quality of the two buildings and determined the buildings had to meet some code requizements, but were not to the point where they could be condemned. 4E �RZDLEY CITY COIII�ICIL 1ffiSTZNG OF �QOQST Z8, 1989 P�QE 7 Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission then reconsidered this request on Auqust 16 and recommended approval with nine stipulations to eventually brinq the property into compliance with the code. She reviewed these stipulations found on Pages 2II and 2JJ of the Council's agenda. Mr. Mike Thompson stated he did not know what transpired on Auqust 16 as he was not present. He stated the property is currently tied up in leqal proceedings and hoped it would all be resolved within the next several months. He stated American Life and Trustee went bankrupt and turned over the properties to a Certified Public Accountant to handle. Mr. Thompson stated it is not known who owns the buildings and today his attorney advised him that the CPA wants what is in escrow. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked who was collecting the rent for this property. Mr. Thompson stated he was collecting the rents and paying off the first mortgage to make sure the buildings remain functional. He stated if they do obtain clear title of the property, they will begin cleaning it up. Councilman Schneider stated regardless of who owns the property, there is a septic system that is leaking wastes on the property. Ms. Dacy state the system is being pumped, but did not know about the soil conditions. She stated the County does not have any information since 1984. She stated the City's policy is before renewing the special use permit, there should be a plan to eliminate these problems and code violations. She stated Mr. Poppenhagen occupied the building not knowing a special use permit was required, but was so advised when he applied for a permit for a sign. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Thompson if they could comply with the stipulations which Ms. Dacy had outlined. Mr. Thompson stated they could not comply with some by the dates outlined. Ms. Dacy stated staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission was more stringent, in terms of dates, then what the Commission recommended to the Council. Councilman Schneider stated he can understand Mr. Thompson not wanting to put any money into improvinq the site if he does not own the property. He questioned how the City would proceed to eliminate these code violations if clear ownership has not been established. lRIDLEY CITY COQ3�iCIL I�ETII�Ia OF 11DaD8T 28. 1l89 P]1G8 8 4F Mr. Newman, assistant City �lttorney, stated if there is a code violation, criminal charges can be brought aqainst the property owners. He stated his office aade a very cursory sYamination of the title and from the infornation provided, it does not support that American Trustee filed bankruptcy. He stated an txplanation was requested of the title problems, but thiB has not been received. Ms. Dacy stated the file contains correspondence with previous owners reqardinq code compliances. She stated after reviewing this file, it was felt using the special use permit process would enable the City to obtain compliance vith the code for the entire property. She stated the parking lot, buildings, and aewaqe are all related to the use of the property. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the property could not hook up to sewer and water rather than installinq a holdinq tank. Ms. Dacy stated the�property owner �ould petition the City to connect to sewer and t�ater and assess the costs against the property. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how soon this could be done, ff the property owner petitioned the City for the improvement. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated a City does not have a contractor at this time, but it probably could still be done this year. Councilman Billings stated if, in fact, the County states the septic system is failinq, there may be a public need to proceed with the connection to City sewer and assess the property. He stated he sympathizes with Mr. PoppenAaqen as he is the one that stands to lose here. He stated on the other hand, the property owner has a vested interest as he is receiving rent for the building. Councilman Billings stated, at this time, it is not known who is the fee owner of the property and, if 7570 Corporation is the fee owner, he would not want to impose stipulations if they were not present this eveninq to respond. He stated the question tben remains on how to enforce the stipulations. Councilman Billings stated he would like a report from the alleged owners as to the status of the title and for the City'e attorney to review the information presented. Mr. Newman stated he assumes Mr. Thompson's attorney has done some investiqation and the City is only requestinq a report on the �tatus of the title. He stated from his infor�ation, 7570 Corporation does not even have an interest of record. He stated 4G FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ![S�TING OF �IIGIIBT 28. 1989 P�GB 9 there appears to be two or three different entities that have varied interests in the property. Ms. Dacy stated a representative from 7570 Corporation signed the application as the fee owner. Mr. Burns, City Manager, Buggested tabling this item until the applicant can produce verification of ownership and use the existing laws to enforce the code. Councilman Schneider stated it seems if the issue of the title is clouded, the City should proceed with the sewer, assess the cost against the property and get the debris cleaned up. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table action on Special Use Permit Request, SP �89-08, until identification of the fee owner can be established. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to direct staff to initiate a reasonable search to ascertain who is the fee owner of this property and work with the petitioner, if possible; and review the areas of vio2ations of the existing code and take aqgressive action to enforce those items that are most significant to the public safety issue such as the septic system and removal of debris on the property. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. B. GONSIDERATION OF COMPR HEN V REVISION: This item was deleted from the agenda. C. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMEND NT T� CHAN(:F. THF. RF.(�iiTRRil Ms. Dacy, Planninq Coordinat , stated this proposed ordinance amendment was reviewed by t Appeals and Planning Commission and recommended for approval the Council. She stated the intent of the ordinance is that c ner lots operate with two front yards and two side yards. Sh stated the only other community that has something similar this proposed amendment is Brooklyn Center. Ms. Dacy stat the Appeals commission was concerned about overcrowdinq ' the rear yard, but with the 10 foot setback and 5 feet on the ther lot, there still would be some qreen area of 10 to 20 fee between structures. She stated an alternatfve would be to cont' ue with the present ordinance and consider each and every case n a variance basis. She stated the staff and Appeals Co ission pursued this research because of the number of corner ts in the City. _ 4H � STAFF REPORT APPEALS OATE �,��OF PLAIW�NC COMNWSSION DATE : May � 7, l 989 F[ZIDLEY CITY COI�VCIL DATE August 16, 1989 A�� gD/dn REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSlTY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES 8� ZONING UTILfTIES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES & ZONWG ENVlRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATI4N SP 4�89-08 Keith's Auto Body and 7570 Incorporated To allow a repair garage 7570 Highway 65 N.E. I.2 acres N/A M-1, I.ight Industrial North, M-I, (Lampert Lumber; South, R-4 (mobile home park) East, C-2, commercial; West, vacant industrial. The site is not serviced by sanitary sewer. N/A None. Yes Yes The site is serviced by a septic system. Approval with stipulations. 41 Staff Report SP #89-08, Keith's Auto Body Page 2 REQUEST The M-1 district requires a special use permit for a repair garage. The petitioner is currently operating a repair garage in the building at the rear of the site. The current tenant, Keith Poppenhagen, was unaware of the special use permit requirement when moving into the building since previous repair establishments have operated from the building. Staff has permitted the continuation of the petitioner's operation until the conclusion of the special use permit process. BACKGROUND The two existing buildings on the subject parcel were built in the late 1960's. The property has been zoned industrial since 1963. The City's building permit file indicates that a repair garage was located in the second building at the rear of the site in 1983. Since that time, three other auto body and repair operations have occupied the building. The City has attempted on several occasions to require a special use permit for repair activities as required by the M-1 district as well as to work with the property owner to make the necessary improvements to the property as required by the City Code. The property has changed ownership several times within the last six year period and has complicated the City's enforcement effort. The ownership issue also appears to pose an issue in this application. The current owner, 7570 Incorporated, stated they purchased the property in December 1986; however, because of several mortgage interests on the property, the title has not been cleared as to who is the fee owner of the property. One of the mortgages was authorized by Midwest Federal, and because of their default, the property owner has to work with the bank's trustee. The petitioner has indicated that it may take several months to resolve the issue. The property owner is claiming that he is unable to make the commitment to improve the property as required at this time, but would consent to a timetable of compliance. The property owner has also indicated that they would prefer to prioritize the building improvements prior to making the necessary site improvements. ArrALYSZs The petitioner has persons. Destroyed then stored at the stripped for parts refurbished. indicated that he employs approximately three or junk vehicles are received at the site, and south end of the building. These vehicles are and used on other cars for repairs, or are Also at the south end of the building are piles of junk and debris 4J Staff Report SP #89-08, Keith's Auto Body Page 3 not reloated to the petitioner's activity, but to the other establishments on the site. The storage of materials in this location as well as at the south end of the other building on the site, constitutes a code violation. The City has been unsuccessful in securing compliance with the various property owners and tenants. The area between the two buildings is not paved nor is the site lined with concrete curb. The bituminous surface in front of the first building extends to the service road pavement. Further complicating the site is that the sewage from the two buildings is being handled by a septic system. In 1984, Anoka County determined that the septic system was failing. At that time, it appears that the tank was pumped and the area cleaned as much as possible. Connection to City sewer was investigated with City staff but because of the cost of the improvement coupled with the change of owners, connection to the sewer was not consummated. There are three alternatives to connect into the sanitary sewer system: 1. Sewer exists to the south within the mobile home park; however, these sewer lines are private and permission must be granted by the mobile home park. Further, the proposed length of extension from the mobile home park to the two existing building may be too long for a simple service connection. A larger line and manholes may be necessary. 2. A connection across the Lampert Lumber property to the north is the second alternative. An eight inch line and manhole is located between Lampert Lumber and the Amoco property. An easement would need to be obtained from Lampert Lumber and their pavement would have to be reconstructed and replaced. 3. The third alternative is to extend the eight inch line from the manhole between Lampert Lumber and the Amoco station to the Highway 65 service road, then south along the service road to the front of the subject property. The estimated cost for this alternative is $27,000. Approximately $10,000 of this work would be to replace the bituminous mat of the service road. In the interim, the septic tank should be removed and replaced by a holding tank which should be pumped on a regular basis. There is no effluent surfacing in the small drainfield area located in front of the building. Apparently in 1984 the system failed such that the drainfield area was not treating the effluent properly. Although there are a small number of employees in the two buildings and these two areas are not used regularly by the traveling public, the septic system must be replaced. A holding tank can be 4K Staff Report SP #89-08, Keith's Auto Body Page 4 installed and pumped on a regular basis until the sewer connection can be made. A copy of the pumping contract should be submitted to the City to ensure that it is being pumped on a regular basis. SUNII�ARY It is imperative that the property be brought into compliance with the City Code. Staff has prepared a modified site plan to illustrate the needed site improvements. The City Attorney has also advised that the property owner put into writing the details regarding the title of the property so that it can be researched by the City and verified for City Council review. RECOMMENDATION The subject property, with or without the special use permit for the repair garage, needs to be improved to meet code requirements. Typically, staff would not recommend approval for a special use permit with the number of outstanding code compliance issues. The current tenant, the petitioner Keith Poppenhagen, appeared to be unaware of the problems with the property. He was also unaware of the special use permit requirement because of previous occupancies by other auto repair businesses. Staff has developed a list of stipulations with a timetable for compliance. Staff also recommends that the special use permit be reviewed on an annual basis in order to gauge progress on the stipulations. If progress is not being made, the City can revoke the special use permit and initiate court proceedings to gain compliance. Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit, SP #89-08, to allow a repair garage at 7570 Highway 65 N.E. with the following stipulations: 1. All parking areas shall be paved and lined with six inch poured concrete curb by August 1, 1990. A five foot setback on the north and south property lines shall also be created in compliance with the setback requirements. 2. A 20 foot planting island shall be created along the front property line in compliance with the parking setback requirement by August 1, 1990. The island shall be curbed and planted as proposed in the proposed landscape plan included in the packet. 3. Al1 piles of debris, car parts, pallets and other materials shall be removed from the south side of buildings and either stored within the building, removed off the site or contained within a six foot opaque fenced area at the southwest corner of the site. All noxious weeds shall be removed and the lawn 4L Staff Report SP #89-08, Keith's Auto Body Page 5 area maintained in a neat fashion. All semi truck trailers which are inoperable or used for storage shall be removed from the site. This work shall be completed by September 1, 1989. 4. The building shall be improved to meet the Uniform Building Code requirements by June 1, 1990. 5. The property shall be serviced with sanitary sewer by January Z, 1991. In the interim, the property owner shall remove the septic system and install a holding tank by January 1, 1990. The tank shall be pumped on a regular basis and a capy of the pumping contract shall be submitted to the City. 6. A letter of credit in the amount of the outside site improvements including poured concrete curbing and landscaping shall be submitted prior to initiation of construction. 7. A letter of credit in the amount of the construction cost for connection to the sanitary sewer shall be submitted prior to construction. 8. The special use permit shall be reviewed by City staff on an annual basis. 9. There shall be no sales of automobiles on the property. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the special use permit for a repair garage, subject to nine stipulations. The Planning Commission amended staff's recommended stipulations by changing the compliance dates. The amended stipulations are as follows: 1. All parking areas shall be paved and lined with six inch poured concrete curb by August 1, 1991. A five foot setback on the north and south property 2ines shall a2so be created in compliance with the setback requirements. 2. A 20 foot planting island shall be created along the front property line in compliance with the parking setback requirement by August 1. 1991. The island shall be curbed and planted as proposed in the proposed landscape plan included in the packet. 3. All piles of debris, car parts, pallets and other materials shall be removed from the south side of buildings and either stored within the building, removed off the site or contained within a six foot opaque fenced area at the southwest corner Staff Report SP #89-08, Keith's Auto Body Page 6 of the site. All noxious weeds shall be removed and the lawn area maintained in a neat fashion. All semi truck trailers which are inoperable or used for storage shall be removed from the site. This work shall be completed by November 1. 1989. 4. The building shall be improved to meet the Uniform Building Code requirements by January 1, 1991. 8. The special use permit shall be reviewed by City staff on November 15, 1989, and thereafter on an annual basis. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve special use permit, SP #89-08, for a repair garage at 7570 Highway 65 N.E., subject to the Planning Commission's recommended stipulations: 1. All parking areas shall be paved and lined with six inch poured concrete curb by Auqust l, 1991. A five foot setback on the north and south property lines shall also be created in compliance with the setback requirements. 2. A 20 foot planting island shall be created along the front property line in compliance with the parking setback requirement by August 1, 1991. The island shall be curbed and planted as proposed in the proposed landscape plan included in the packet. 3. All piles of debris, car parts, pallets and other materials shall be removed from the south side of buildings and either stored within the building, removed off the site or contained within a six foot opaque fenced area at the southwest corner of the site. All noxious weeds shall be removed and the lawn area maintained in a neat fashion. All semi truck trailers which are inoperable or used for storage shall be removed from the site. This work shall be completed bv November 1. 1989. 4. The building shall be improved to meet the Uniform Building Code requirements by January l, 1991. 5. The property shall be serviced with sanitary sewer by January 1, 1991. In the interim, the property owner shall remove the septic system and install a holding tank by January 1, 1990. The tank shall be pumped on a regular basis and a copy of the pumping contract shall be submitted to the City. 6. A letter of credit in the amount of the outside site improvements including poured concrete curbing and landscaping shall be submitted prior to initiation of construction. 4M 4N Staff Report SP #89-08, Keith's Auto Body Page 7 7. A letter of credit in the amount of the construction cost for connection to the sanitary sewer shall be submitted prior to construction. 8. The special use permit shall be reviewed by City staff on November 15. 1989, and thereafter on an annual basis. 9. There shall be no sales of automobiles on the property. 0 „ `. (NNJ ILJ. • 3 2 I � ,.� �...� � �zo -0 i <zoo; i � �u, , Cdeoj i ' 'I soo ��a � (hoaJ .wn. i� ( 9 • ..ca1 � T' � /G � »e» ? �JSi I! �( � 5,1 � li /_° i I ��5i o• i3 y ; ' �l; SP ��89-08 Keith's Auto N l/2 SE'C. /2, C/T Y OF f R/C, �� '2 .�, z � .;. - a.- , � . , _.,..._.--- - � M � �" LA P RT' ^ }� 1.:^~ o. :� gR � ^ cm i Rs.; �»� ... ' ,Jo ��' �ir:..+ • �e�� tt i !~i i.. (�) 2 i � �U � � �� b .: r, t' i i �� 3 • �z SFRt EY ,�1 � . �t� �a iT�ON �i k�'� �� ' A DER ON M 1, � • � � ,; � ".; F ../ � � •. ✓�l 15 ,; . I ;e � ' (r' e f 4 �p6 r � ps) _..�..1. :."i�., � ,... r (Z+o) . ��r I 'w- .a,;-;. � . W �.��s� ,.: '�� W ` s r• � �It '�� N k /o "`aa% ,.� oi %y � -F.J9• .�'�.� o W ` � �!' Y � � . a Faoa; o, m � a _r wor� : � 9j : '�� ` i 4 � �'° � r „ ,4 .�:;; �, ,,,;, �� `` 9C3, . ZZ ;� �. � �i ?f� '-oc? "C" �;G�pl ei�� , � (.zoo> i � � .: ' �sc i ( 26 0'; y. I�P � (,�oo) ., I , i r . ....,.,. S/.►, . � y Q �► • �; �� ' i ; �o ,� � � '� DEVELOPMENT "Z. �' �� Z ,+�; 1; �. ,. a:,. . � -:-�–=-- rs%w I >,. �a . s � o.. w�.ih rrr /c ; • r,. .., rc'� w'!i � �tr�. t � M+ Ar�ry . � ..H (�. . f . ( ✓:r/:w � \ .. � ' ��y � �i -,LAI _�> . c°� � ° •�6M�.. . t Oi i� �. .; : ZI * ' �, /.'."ys,� W S�f�•M�S : }I , i _ " � �� ; , Q� —�—� i -��• ',-- �?� ----�-- — , — � � . �... Y ��ti, S i , Z' =�; ,,, i i I � ii� s� .IHO. 1 ` � ' iI --"_ r.�n�.ec..,.n..�.os..e J 1h �� ...o:%) � �� ta =I I I . ti �� . FI � :FIRESI � Q i i i ''++ 4 N; �; �� f, -. . : 8,...� ' � �N. ll "c. . s.i� ( ' • ��f i � ' ; �'. --- ` . "� I I �i , IYAL� j CEJVT/t,qL �� V/EW��I.......il/'ANOR ,�,, � , � , �, , :�� 2nd R ' ADD/T/OM �: � o ` - � � � ,, t, "1 i� � � � �„ �p �n �'�,� N� GaJ��:�r��1+ iN��,�i�,�� ,s� ; � 4.l 1 3°� t�. f e�] ,�`io9i�,? �.+J .t .'c` � .. i � I � P � ; � � i �M � T3 I/2 AVE. N.E. '� �'�� . � � : � ' '•-. �! � � . " � �, r� y p �v � w �+' � a? ;+� M' 12 � °' ,� ,�o� ' �: i ifc �!e � 2 3 � 5 f 7 B 't�!' 'r I' 3✓ iS 'r '� . —�_ � a ��' "'d- - ! 2��. 2 i i � � �.aa.�—== :� - • - -��-Cl ►:; : _ V£-�---M.f—.�_-----t— i � " •LEMfER� � SEC. ItI 8 � I 23 24 13 LOCATtON MAP u T � � a � ,LMUUL �� . s � . • �� , S + � � , � � ;:� 76 TH. AVE. i ' , • a z I is � ~ IJ � � � :•l;. „'s'. ,1 1 �' �''�'. = .. 4 .'�. ,t . f. - ,:! �p s ;� �a ;4 y �r� l: ,� B ' � . ' . 75 TH AVE. N E. , � h-r. �' � � :'�•: � W � 1� � �s , z♦ 3 _ � .. 1 .. 4 _�) � f Z• 1\ ��.'.^� S �_^ . � � <S f � '�� 7 1♦ .� c + � � � �` r� r i:� �' ' ' zz 9 fP. •� . , --� w � ---�' __ __- z ,a r�,� • r� r • .'1 a��. - f 7 �,�i .� f -� o'ap+L� ` 'f �� I ., % // / / // i �/ / / / / i � ' . � �i � , % �, � _ , _- � T _ � —� Es_�_ — ` f� �r (�+',� �, , (�'', � `t � r: :!'' F_ !"� �. � � t,. � '�'��-- �• ''�� . �,. � �. _ � � . r � 1, .�• �� j` '�' w � �4.., {.�eY � �`.� Or � �� "' r' t �c; ca O 2 } 3 _ (.7 z I SP ��89-08 Keith's Auto .� % / Z�NING MAP 5P �i89-08 Keith's Autn PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS � � cinr oF F�� DATE: TO: C0IVIMUNITY DEVEL�PMENT DEPARTMENT MEMOR.AN DUM February 22, 1990 �/William Burns, City Manager � v FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #89-15, Keith's Auto Body Attached is the staff report for the variance request, VAR #89-15. The Appeals Commission voted 3-1 to recommend approval to the City Council of the variance request, with the following stipulations: 1. 2. The variance is approved pending the approval of a special use permit, SP #89-08. The variance is approved for this sign, and this tenant only. Staff maintains its position and recommends that the City Council deny this variance request, VAR �89-15, on the basis that the petitioner has the opportunity to place the sign in a position that would not violate the City Sign Code. NII�i/dn M-90-126 5 , - � 5A � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE 8/�2/s9 CITYOF �.� cor�vrssio�, DA� FRIDLEY CtiY OOIxVCIL DATE : February 26, 1990 ,�,��1_ s REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONNG ADJACENT LAND USES b ZONNG UTLlTES PARK DEDiCAT10N ANALYSIS FNANCiAL NVIPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREFfJ�l.St1/E PLAN C,OMPATBNITY WITH ADJACENT USES b �ONNG ENVIRONMENTAL t'rONSDERATION.S STAFF RECOMMEPDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLA�ING COMMISSION REC.OA�NAENDATION VA.�2 �89-15 Keith's Auto Body (�:eith Poppenhagen) Z+o reduce the required sign setbacY, fram the side property line fn�n 10 ft. to 0 ft. 7570 Highway 65 :d.E. N�1, Light Industrial North: M-1, Light Incustrial; East: Highway 65; South: 1�4, Mabile Ho?�e Park; [�est: M-1, Light Industria N/A N/A Yes Yes V/A Denial : Staff Report VAR #89-15, Keith's Auto Body Page 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.12.02.E requires a free-standing sign to be at least ten (10) feet from any property line or driveway. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide adequate separation from the property line. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "I can meet the 10 feet from the road, but if I go 10 feet from the side line, it will be in the middle of the driveway. When improvements of the special use permit are met, I will move the sign to comply." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner, Keith Poppenhagen, is requesting to place an 18 sq. ft. pylon sign advertising his auto body repair shop. The petitioner is requesting that the sign be placed near the north property line within a 5 ft. grassy area. Currently, the petitioner feels there is not a suitable place to install the sign that would conform with the Zoning Code. Site The site is located at 7570 Highway 65 and is in an M-1, Light Industrial District, and is surrounded on two sides, north and west, by Light Industrial Districts, with an R-4, Mobile Home Park, to the south. The site contains two multi-tenant buildings with Keith's Auto Body in the westerly building on the site. Backqround The Planning Commission recommended approval of a special use permit request for a repair garage for the petitioner on August 16, 1989, subject to nine stipulations regarding site improvement. The City Council will consider the request at its August 28, 1989, meeting. Staff Report VAR #89-15, Keith's Auto Body Page 3 Analysis � rawes�+�i to 5C � r vaway." o e er, Mr. Poppenhagen ' could place his sign in the parking area which would not necessarily be in a driveway situation (see site plan). The sign could be protected by four metal bollards which would prevent cars from damaging the sign when parking. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the request, VAR �89-15, by Keith's Auto Body, on the basis that the petitioner has another option that would meet code. However, should the Appeals Commission recommend approval of the request, staff recommends the following stipulation: 1. The sign shall be relocated in conformance with the sign ordinance by August 1, 1991, subject to approval of Special Use Permit, SP #89-08, for a repair garage. APPEALS COMMISSION ACTION The Appeals Commission voted 3-1 in favor of recommending approval of the variance request,F VAR #89-15, ,.�, x�� setL3a��k� �"�i'�at�`'�'t�Y�`�`�� c�pei�y� �.i�M��, � es�� Y':� � � �.� th� €ol �e� x. ,�3 : :.- ., . _ . _ _ . � 1. The variance is approved pending the approval of a special use permit, SP #89-08. 2. The variance is approved for this sign, and this tenant only. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council deny the variance request, VAR #89-15, on the basis that the petitioner has the opportunity to place the sign in a portion that would not require a variance. 5D APPEALS COI+IIrIISSION M�ETING, �UGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 6 it hard that they cou dn't come up with a plan that would fit on the lot, provide the p per setbacks, and still get 1200 feet with a different house plan. Particularly he dieaqreed since ft was so recently platted. Dr. Vos thouqht there wa a hardship due to the easement and the curvature of the road. the street were desiqned differently, there would not be a probl m. He did not what else could be done there. There was a defini hardship. Mr. Barna stated he found a ardship with the utility easement in the way it was oriqinally pla ted and approved. He did aqree with Mr. Kuechle that there were ot er designs that could fit. This was a small footprint area and the petitioner planned to put in a very nice house. It was easier a d a shorter process to ask for a variance. He would tend to vot in favor. r Dr. Vos asked the longest dimensi n that could be built on the lot. Ms. McPherson stated, after measur ng the lot and allowing for side yard setbacks, that approximately 67 feet would be the biggest house that could be built across t lot. OM TION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Sh�rek, to recommend to the City Council approval of variance request, VAR �89-16. UPON A VOICE VOTE, VOS, SHEREK, AND B�A�NA VOTING AYE, AND KUECHLE VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECLARED�THE MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Barna stated that the minutes of � Planning Commission at their next meetin on September 11. Dr. Vos stated the request would have qone if we had not approved, because staff had Mr. Hartman asked if the staff had recomme petitioner have been okay. Mr. Barna stated that was correct. is request would go to and to the City Council the City Council even :ommended denial. approval, would the Dr. Vos stated that, unfortunately, since staf did not recommend approval, the City Council must consider. Even i one neiqhbor had objected, the City Council would had to review. 3. �`ONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE RE4UEST VAR #89-15 BY REITH'S AUTO BODY (REITH POPPENHAGEN): Pursuant to Section 214.12.02.E of the Fridley City Code to reduce the required siqn setback in the sfde property line from 10 feet to 0 feet, to allow the construction of a free- standing siqn at 7570 Hiqhway 65 N.E. APPEAIS COI�IISSION I+�ETING, �UGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 7 rjOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by l�Ir. Sherek, to open the public hearinq. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECIARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:10 P.M. Ms. 1rlcPherson stated that Mr. Poppenhagen had just received Planning Commission approval for a special use permit for an auto body shop at 7570 Highway 65. This will go before the City Council on Auqust 28. It was an M-1, Liqht Industrial, district. Keith would like to advertise his business with a siqn and was proposing to place the sign on the north side. The site plan presented was proposed and not current. Ttie Planning Commission required new pavement and curb and planting areas. Reith would like to place the siqn on the north side within 10 feet of the side property line. There was currently a grassy area there, but no pavement. This would be on the side of driveway. Staff has recommended that, even though there was no landscaping there, there was still an opportunity to place the siqn 10 feet from the line. Bollards could be placed around the siqn to protect it. The sign as proposed was within the square footaqe allowed in the siqn ordinance. Mr. Barna asked how far to the north was Lampert's Lumber siqn. Ms. McPherson stated she did not measure. She thought the sign was in the lower south half of the parcel near the boulevard. Mr. Poppenhagen stated this siqn was straight out the front entrance of Lampert's. Ms . McPherson stated there was currently a service road to the east that ends approximately in the center of the parcel. Mr. Poppenhaqen's business was located in the second building toward the rear of the property. The sign did not come up as an issue durinq the special use permit process. Potentially the owners should be required to have a comprehensive sign plan because they potentially could have more than three tenants. Dr. Vos asked if the owners would have more siqns in addition to this siqn. Ms. McPherson stated that a development was allowed only one free standing siqn. Mr. Poppenhagen stated that the tenants in the front building advertise in the window in front of that building. Ms. McPherson stated siqns are allowed on the structure. Dr. Vos felt the proposed sign was a small sign. 5E 5F APPEAIS CO2rII+IISSION I�IEETZ1dG, I�iUGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 8 Mr. Barna asked if the billboard was on south property line. Ms. McPherson stated the billboard was along the south property line. There were also lilac bushes and other vegetation trom the trailer court. Mr. Sherek asked if this would only be until the isproveaents are aade. lls. McPherson stated yes, the petitioner trould be required to comply with Siqn Code when the landscape isprovements are completed. Mr. Sherek asked why auch a lonq time period uras being recommended. Ms. McPherson stated there was currently uncertainty as to who owns the property. Mr. MichaeZ Thompson was one of the owners. There was an issue over whether the bank owns the property, whether Mr. Thompson and partners own it, or whether the mortqage company owns it. There were many parties involved in this issue. This parcel has had a history of many code enforcement problems. The Planning Commission approved to have certain improvements stretched out over two years. There was reluctance by current owr►ers to put more money into the site if they did not qet title. Mr. Barna sta�ed the position of Planning Commission was to allow time to clear the title. Mr. Sherek asked if someone other than Mr. Poppenhaqen would be doing the improvements. Ms. McPherson stated this was correct. Ms. Sherek stated that, if no one did improvements, the City would then have a siqn. Ms. McPherson stated this was an issue and that this issue had been discussed by the Planning Commission and included in the stipulations for the special use permit. Mr. Sherek asked if l�Is. McPherson had been by the property in the last few days. Pis. llcPherson stated that she had been by the property about 2 veeks ago. The property was looked at when the specfal use permit came up and then aqain about two weeks aqo. Mr. Sherek asked if the property had been cleaned up. tis. KcPherson stated there has not been auch activity as far as clean up of the site. The trailers have not been removed. 5G �PPEALS COIrII�ISSION l�EETING, �UGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 9 Mr.Poppenhaqen stated that the siqn will run east and west so it can be seen when coming up Hiqhway 65. If it was put in the �iddle, due to shrubs and the billboard there, custoaers would not aee the siqn until they were just about on it. There was a telephone pole a short distance from where the proposed ciqn would be. If electricity was needed, it could be run from the pole. If the siqn was in the middle, it would be necessary to go through the building for electricity. Mr. Poppenhaqen thouqht it would look better in that corner because the business was in the rear. Standard Oil Aas two siqns on each side right on the corners. He would be better to move to the front. He was fnvestinq some money in the siqn, and it was nice lookinq siqn. It used the most modern technique for siqns that there was, and he felt it would be the best looking thinq on that lot. In the 5-foot qrassy area, he felt the sign would not look out of place, especially with the telephone pole there. If he went 10 feet, the siqn would be in the driveway. Dr. Vos asked if Lampert Lumber was usinq that area for storage of utility sheds. Mr. Poppenhagen stated these sheds are displayed outdoors for advertising purposes. Ms. McPherson stated there was a wooden fence where Lampert has storage and there was a chain link fence which was at the rear of the first building. Mr. Poppenhagen stated that, regardless of any improvements done in the front, he still has to drive by to qet to his business. Ms. McPherson stated the sign could still be placed in the island 10 feet from the driveway. Mr. Barna stated that one reason Lampert was qranted a variance with regard to signage was the hardship of customers looking for a business and not seeing it until they were there. He believed the same hardship would apply to this business even more so. He thouqht the further to the south you get with a siqn the harder it was going to be for someone cominq north to find it. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed siqn was 18 square feet, the allowable was 80 square feet. Mr. Poppenhagen stated the sign was not big but it was quite colorful. Mr. Sherek asked if Mr. Poppenhagen wanted the siqn to be temporary. Mr. Poppenhagen stated he wouZd like the siqn to be permanent. He would like to have the sign qo up on the north side. There was now parkinq there. 5H APPFJ�iIS C�OI�SZSSION I�ETING, 11UGIJST 22, 1989 P�GE 10 llr. Sherek asked if I4r. Poppenhagen vas turned down, vhat would he do. l�ir. Poppenhaqen stated he vas not sure that h� would remain in business. Businesses without siqns have few cuatoasra. I+ir. Sherek asked if the ]Ippeals Co�ission qave t�mporary permission to put the siqn up and remove ft by 1991, what would he ao. Mr. Poppenhaqen stated that, aesuminq he was still there, he would have to sove it. He vould like to put t,he siqn in and have it reviewed svery year when the persit was reviewed. If, for whatever reason it was necessary to �ove the siqn, then he would have to move it. Dr. Vos asked if this was an annual review. Ms. McFherson stated it was because of the licensing fcr automotive use, the case would be reviewed on a reqular basis. Mr. Poppenhagen stated that, when he bouqht that business, he checked with the City and was told there tras no licenses needed. He then came in for a state used car dealership license to be siqned for M-1 commercial area and then was told e special use permit was necessary. He followed through, and this has gone on all summer. There was also the questfon of clearing the property. Why do so if no permit was to be issued. Now, according to the stipulations, this must be done by November 1. Ms. McPherson stated, with the issue of review, stipulation �8 of the special use permit etates that it shall be reviewed by staff on October 1, 1989, and thereafter on an annual basis. If staff felt there was a problem with the parcel, it would come back to the City Council. Mr. Poppenhagen stated that, if he left the area, he would take the siqn vith him. Dr. Vos asked if there was a poesibility of a traffic hazard. Mr. Poppenhagen did not think so because there was a pole there. 1►Ir. McPherson etated that traffic patterns are such that people know where the drivinq lanes are, follew the lanes, and do not qet that close to the property line. Iir. Barna asked if the face of the siqn would be north and south. l�Ir. Poppenhagen stated this was correct. The siqn dfinensions are 27 inches X 8 feet. 51 APPEAIS COI+IIrIISSION MEETING, AUGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 11 Irlr. Barna stated there was a proposed 20 feet deep island, so if the sign were placed within the island, it would fit within the Code. lds. McPherson stated the Code does not stipulate what part of the siqn needed to be 10 feet from the driveway. Mr. Barna stated the siqn could still qo east and west and it would be pretty close. Ms. McPherson felt there should be a fair amount of room. Mr. Kuechle asked if staff had talked to Lampert's. Ms. McPherson stated they were sent a notice and the City did not receive any calls or �omments. O ION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Sherek, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECI�F►RED THE PUBLIC HEARING CIASED AT 8:33 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated he was in favor of grantinq the variance as requested. It seemed that with the unsure state of when the improvements were going to appear there, Mr. Poppenhaqen was in a poor situation to put a sign in an island that did not exist and may not exist until 3 to 4 years down the road. Since there was nothing close to the north property line and that would provide the site with the best information for where his business was, it seemed the best location. One objection was the proximity to the highway and the clutter of siqns, but since it was equal to the others in the area, he would allow it to be placed in the upper area. Mr. Sherek stated he was uncomfortable about the general plans or lack of concrete plans for improvements. Based on the plan, he saw no problem with putting siqn on the island and had no problem with the siqn being offset and back from the highway. It was meant to be a temporary sign until the improvements were made. He thought it would be best to make him put the siqn in the fina2 position. Dr. Vos aqreed with Mr. Kuechle. He questioned whether the island would ever exist and felt the siqn should be on the north side of the site. Irtr. Barna stated that the feelinq of the Planninq Commission was, in addition to the problems of who owns the property, do they recommend not havinq any business there or qet some kind of income cominq in from the property to provide incentive to improve the property. It seemed better to have businesses in the buildings 5J APPF.ALS CO?Q+IISSION l�ETING, 1►UGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 12 rather than havinq disrepair. He also aqreed that with the title situation it could be far into the future before the island was put in. Lnmpert's wae qiven a variance on the size and location of their sfqn and the auto dealership was also qiven a variance. He vould be comfortable with the siqn in the proposed new curb cut. 8e vould be uncomfortable that, if the ialand was buiZt, the siqn be aoved there but not to put a ti�e on it. l�Ir. Ruechle asked if the plantings were there at this time. Ms. KcPherson stated all plantings are proposed with a deadline of 1991 to complete. There was currently no landscaping or curb and qutter. Dr. Vos felt it should require that the petitioner will have the variance upon meetinq the atipulations in the special use permit or he will not do. Ms. McPherson stated the oumers are required and responsible for improvements, not Mr. Poppenhaqen. Dr. Vos asked if this was the first time the City ha�d had stipulations attached to the property. Ms. McPherson stated this was correct. Mr. Kuechle asked, if the stipulations were not met, the owners would lose the permit and not be able to operate there. Ms. I+IcPherson stated this was correct. This was why the permit must be reviewed by ctaff. The petitioner or owners wou2d have the right to re-negotiate the time limits. In the worst case, the City Council could pull the permit which would disallow Mr. Poppenhagen to operate the auto establishment on this parcel. Ms. McPherson stated, ff the Commission felt uncomfortable that Mr. Poppenhagen would vacate�the premises and the Commission felt uncomfortable that siqn would continue to be, the �otion could state that this variance be for this siqn and this business only. ��Q,�1 by Dr. Vos, seconded by I+Ir. Ruechle, to recommend to the City Council approval of variance request, V1,R �89-15, that this be for this siqn and this business only, subject to approval of special use permit #89-08. 1�[r. 1Cuechle stated the aotion did not pick up the �atter that, if in 1991 the site plan was completed accordinq to the special use persit, that the aiqn be aoved. UPON l�i VOICE VOTE, VOS, Bi�iRNA, 1�TD RUECHLE VOTING I�iYE, SHEREK VOTING NAY, CH�►IRPERSON BARNA DECIdiRED THE MOTION CARRIED. � . APPEAIS COIrIIrIISSION MEETING, PiUGUST 22, 1989 PAGE 13 Mr. Barna stated this matter will be received by the Planning Commission and then to City Council at their September 11 meetinq. Mr. Poppenhagen stated he would like to complete the process as soon as possible. It would take 6 weeks after orderinq to qet the eiqn and he would like to install the eign before the found freezes. ADJOURNMENT• I�OTION by Mr. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to adjourn the , meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BARNA DECI�ARED THE AUGUST 22, 1989, APPEAIS CO1rIIrlISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:50 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Lavonn Cooper Recording Secretary 5K SP ;`89-08 Keith's Auto c � J N //2 SEC. /2, C/T Y Of fRiC•, 2 , � L 21 : M�. «� � �� I �« � � � � � ._ " �AMfPER1'' � � ;; _.�-°; =;.aR �,, .. , - •�;,-��5;:-� :,� ;;M < l3 � �z t .f. �' �,' 3 � � , ," �, • p e t: �• � �� r3 �z FR(pLEY i' r,. � � ��: � � : � ' - � i r'orv i � �� o. ; ;� � A DERSON ; �= `,�.:- J � ,.�. '� �,� �., aADp �, , -. .. , .. � ".�1. /,� , , .i .. ...,F .� ; �_ � �i Y t � ;i � s i- e � � 1 �l .� A F ' ' ., '� ' 1 '�1� ' '. � ,_,<, ...,, . .� : .. ,,.. ir w � � �p� ....... - s�, 1 , , - . e� f ,•r pd ' �� o w " � • i , � r ' � DEVELOPMENT � � � s,'°, w.:,.: • � �� Z�o � � ... -i� ..; • . F.... ..,. . " '� .T„� � � .� -,e • .w�� . � . i 'A" ' � � � � �A� - i o. .... � �,. . • ,�, • • � /a i J ' . . r�� W . +� 1 ` . 1 i'� _ _ _. _—_ -- _ - __—_ __ , �i' ' � . � - �n �o� �_�.— � _' �,- � _�= a -.' f-�� - i p ' i ° / � Z i � �... . W > f :� S "' �'' i , ___.�.._' y —_— _ 1t�' . . r � . L�� , . W . �' ... _• " i .' �1; ` ¢ , : � s ------_ . ...... .... ...., ro � ►- , . »,,, N � '- i Y _... . V . . o • Z � i :. Q �, s � ' �1 Y _ � � FI -- - -- ' .FIRE51 a -. m �d � � � 4 � ��r ? � W % �: �. • i N .s. .... _ p.... .... < �.1'1 i r . �^" � ... � . • 0� - � J ,. t , .q?r -- " ' = A �a z `r' CE7VTR�4L : V/£W � , .. . � . -i{fANOR „ Y � � ` , r 2ind � � ' ADD/T/AN°. . • �✓; • , � I , i , r � - • i j �° !JV . � � � '��3 =� s.�.�':�,�,;.��;1r;'�"'; ��'� � ° - ;� ,. Z:� . . Py�2 AYE. N.E . ;, r? t es� , :��,: � �� ,' , � , : . � � ,' iV�. ;,r -° , '!' 'S��i.'y �c��r;rj. � •��'tn». ... vi ayy ,�c,o; , �i - f f� � i ♦,��'�'�fa��,� ,�.r � � •� e _�. '2• �?7 a N� r � ' t ,".�� _ �__��_ ° -----'�— .�-CCM7EI1�— 1f-f— -�-' � s[c rr� � �� t ��. � 2a 13 LOCATION MAF' 0 � � � ,}. ' �► � � 1 �L►1UJl ' I _ ..` - f � �' • I - . ; 4�� !� � , , '.� 76rH nvE � • , o : i .. , � �-��°� � �� ;�� , ;� -,. +{ c^:.`-` .. .> > �'�#: , � = . � :•b: s� • o^c' . • a �J ! �• . f . c ^, � +' Q p• f- .. ' ',�' "F� � � - { e " , • -: �.:�_ z �S TH avE. N E. ,��o , �_. �, t� - =� J � - ' . ' ' � e^b�._C^ �� , 1, � cc _o �- ' - _� � j � 2� j }�j �c_a-�`- � 1 ' 4 ,�-,--.�, F ^�^_: i 2• � ��IL• �� __ - _ f S .. . e'_._,' � _ _ . ' � � • � • 'r...:.�: � �� 1♦ L �% �'V�- - , — � 1) f �•`.�� Y _'= ; -fi�-� _ . 1t ' . � �� / i . � � �: z ' ��' . .1 '.1� �c . f -- •�m � � � ,o,u'� � ` � . � � � � � � .� . s ��. i �„ �/ F j , � / ti� /Q� ��/ ,� � - -_ ;, _- -= �c^o^^^� - __- _��.-_-' �^-.�� =�, ��__ ____ _ =�^^^=.^^?;'; � - - -=- - :--- -�-_ i: " - _ "-__ : :-"=_ . 2 <J / MtNNESOTA • 4 � � .s = � -- L � �c-: `; �; f "� � .r"� � o � �":• �. � z �. !`� � t , �• �'� � '�'� �. �• t �� l ��. �, ��j �`."��,`�, _ E� 4.• 6' , } �r' : '�� -' : � 1 y�;' � �._.� = � `� 3 % �'� � � ; a � �•` t,,' Y J�-/ � _r�� , �, `�'' / �' •i .--�..:� .. t � �s. =t sP ;�89-08 5M Keith's Auto /,, � ,; , �� i , � � f / // i; -"�- - -� ' ��, -�__ ' � Y''•"- ;__�;��.'_'_'.=,= >_ �� ,�_ - `�! - 5�� .��. � : ; � .,�,, , , ;-. . y?,. , � -, . � , � �_ � / j / ! / • �j]''L''!'Z"' T � : ; : �� ', �� /%,��X.'t ; � - , -. _ X, �, , , ' {' r'� `• � •p 7� T•�i/ � 1 i --Q♦•��r1��"wi�� • • • • �• ►0.. � RQo.. . .� _.—.- - - - ,� s • • r / � ZONING MAP i 0 1 T� „ . _ � � - � g � a � �� o � , R 11 �V J I � S � i � I v I � � ----- - �� ' �� ' � � I I I i i i i � I � � _ � SP ��89-08 Keith's Auto ��.�a � S � � � � . a' � "= 3 ��' �� ,RR�'jj LL � � J, � a � T L� 2 � -y\ J � ' C .0 d Z �_ � � ' Z �` c � � m I ' a �� r _ �� , Z o �� 5 � > � �' � J D 0 � o D �' � � � � . r r �, W `N �} � � y N � � `J PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS � � ! t ♦ 3 < < � t - r� f �t � � �'* � � � � � �� ' � �� . . i � � � � � s � �� • , � t � 1 . � 1 � `+ � i � ' � / � � � � � � �• v • � � � �� ' ' * � � �' . � � ; � �. c � � ->'" � � -�� +� _ � � � ...— � � N.,�k, si<<��iti nna��,��,.��,ce MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager � PW90-44 FROM: �ohn G. F1ora,�Public Works Director' DATE: February 23, 1990 SUBJECT: Forfeit Land We have received notice from the Anoka County Land Commissioner of seven (7) parcels of land which will become tax forfeit effective September 1, 1990. They are requesting the City's response to sale by March 16, 1990. �arcel No. 48 consists of right-of-way along Highway 65 and would ontribute to our Viron Road extension. Therefore, I would recommend this property be transferred to the City as fee property. /Parcels 49, 50, 51 and 52 are condo sites in the Innsbruck Villages �,/ and should be combined and sold for construction of a single unit �x as defined in the Innsbruck Plat. arcel 53 is an empty lot on 2nd and 48th Streets. This parcel is unbuildable by itself and should be combined with Parcels 13 and 14. rcel 54 is an empty parcel on Liberty Street east of Ashton venue. This item is unbuildable by itself and should be combined with Parcel 10 or 12. Recommend the City Council approve the disposition of these properties so that we may respond to the County. JGF/ts 0 �- -1 • �. � 1 �' C o`~�t �� ,�f �'�S ��'�'NES��' EUGENE J. RAFFERTY Land Commissioner Ext. 1879 . � COUNTY C�F ANOKA Office of Land Commissioner Ms. Shirley Haapala, Clerk City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 COURTHOUSE ANOKA, MiNNESOTA 55303 612-421-4760 January 24, 1990 Re: Approval of Classi�cation and Sale of Forfeit Land - CL90-Exhibit A Dear Ms. Haapala: Enclosed you should find the following: A. L Resolution 90-15 dated January 23, 1990 classifying certain forfeit lands in Anoka County. A list of forfeit lands classified under Resolution 90-15 which lie within your jurisdiction. C. A classification and sale approval form listing the lands that lie within your jurisdiction, which is to be siqned. sealed and returned to us along with a copy of the motion or resolution ofyour qoverning body aQprovinq the classification and sale. � E A form for each forfeit parcel shown on the list of forfeit lands in your jurisdiction to help us analyze and appraise the parcel. We ask that you complete and return these forms to us. A verification of special assessments form which is to be completed, signed, sealed, and returned to us. Chapter 282.01 subdivision 1 of the Minnesota Statutes requires that the Town Board or governing body of a municipality must approve the classification and sale of forfeit parcels that lie within their jurisdiction. If disapproval of any parcel is not made within 90 days from the date of this letter, it is deemed that the Town Board or governing body has approved the classification and sale. If the Town Board or governing body desires to acquire any parcel lying within the boundaries of the town or municipality, it shall within 90 days of the request for ctass�cation and sale approval, file a written application with the County Board to withhold the parcel from sale. The County Board will then withhold the parcel from sale for one year. Affirmative Actlon / Equal Opportunity Employer :�� , Page Two. All parcels on the list are stii! within the repurchase period and would not be availabie for sale until Sepiember 1, 1990. This is to give former owners or persons with an interest in the property, who have a compeliing reason, an opportunity to repurchase the land. If you desire to acquire any parcel still within the repurchase period, yau can file an application which can be acted upon after September 1, 1990, assuming the Board does not allow repurchase of the parcel. We would like to have all the forms and paper work returned to us bv March 16, 1990. We appreciate your help and understanding in getting this project put together. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Yours very truly, � -� �� 1�� Gene Raff� � Land Com issioner GR:sw Enclosures cc: County Commissioner County Administrator . : CLASSIFICATION LIST 90 EXHlBIT A Appraised Sec. or Twp. or Value of Subdivision Lot Block Range Land Citv of FridleX Unplatted 48. 12 30 24 23 0001 Plat 53912 Parcel 3000 Key 457286 Unplatted City of Fridiey 12 30 24 That part of the SW�i4 of NW�ia of Sec 12-30-24 desc as fol-com at the SE corner thereof-th N along the E line of said SW�ia of NW>>a of Section 12-30- 24 to the south line of the north 726 ft of said SW�ia of NW�ia-th W along the S line of said N 726 ft to the E rt of way line of St Trk Hwy No 65-th S along the E rt of way line of St Trk Hwy No 65 to the S line of SW�ia of NW�ia of Sec 12-30-24-th E along said S line to the point of beg there terminating (subj to perm ease to city of Fridley 6- 2-�� ) Innsbruck Villages 49. 24 30 24 41 0230 Plat 56363 Parcel 0780 Key 498278 Innsbruck Villages 1 21 Lot 1 B!k 21 lnnsbruck Village 50. 24 30 24 41 0231 Plat 56363 Parcel 0790 Key 498287 (nnsbruck Viilages 2 21 Lot 2 Blk 21 Innsbruck Villages 51. 24 30 24 41 0232 Plat 56363 Parcel 0800 Key 498296 Innsbruck Villages 3 21 Lot 3 Blk 21 Innsbruck Villages -13- sC CLASSIFiCATION LfST 90 EXHIBtT A Appraised Sec. or Twp. or Value of Subdivision Lot Btock Range Land CftY of Fridlev �Con't) innsbruck Villages (Con't) 52. 24 30 24 41 0233 Plat 56363 Parcel 0810 Key 498303 Innsbruck Villages 4 2y Lot 4 Blk 2f tnnsbruck ViHages Pivmouth 53. 26 30 24 32 0036 Plat 57352 Parcel 1520 Key 517532 Piymouth City of Fridley 15 3 Lot 15 Bik 3 Plymouth �rina Brook Park 54. 03 30 24 42 0102 Plat 59140 Parcel 2280 Key 534103 Spring Brook Park City of F�idley 11 12 Lot 11 Blk 12 Spring Brook Park -14- .� i �� - � ` . � � �- � � N � ti _ �« •�►• � .^. * _ �' Z , � �R� . �� ..., h, t�,j �. N, r- t� ,> . r'� t� " Q . � v a .� � � � ,o � � 4 .. . . , `� : � ; `' � th � ! � . ` � "' �'" . ; . � 'i � M , ' �"�. I ' \ + ` i` � •* w � � ° og � �� =v :,m � � ,� � I �� f. � - � , o �,, �v ° . �• 9 ' �'T" a� o' I ,'0 I � ♦ 7P fF , v �C '�s' `� � !1 os �a �' -:� � �3%t'fH ' OC/ OOZ '.�� < �f/�� ^ �� M V _ � �—�T ••..I ' — i I ' QN �d HJIH �iNflal 31d1S � i � � � � __ - � � � ff 1 � � I ^ I -9/�I I' -r- �:. �. � �'rK�� fJdUi'��' ��•✓$' . _ .. �O( (� ) (� i �\` � _ _ � 71 l l � C� �7 � dl�l �� :f��' ��iv — O `� I � �' . ��'�'� � � ` � � � � � - — �� * . � `� �s � .' � �� ;� ° o �$ 6F.`� �� 3�a�a� �o �l� :;� ..... w.. .:�:� - ��... ��... ��Z_ << � � � ti �o S11Wn 3ldaodao� � `' � � .. o _ ` �. -ff �;�,, c �+v h � ..� � � � V _•+ Od,; ` ' , • . • o � : . ., � ..�., r \ y � y,� �,,r�s � "' � ' , : � � � �-. y i �., �,,. tv � # a. Q S�: �- r:r- ��. `�;, � �, _`� �., � � � � yQ N '�` ~ �L � ,. ��- . - , �J� � �.� , -� / . 4 Qy a , _. -.� �i ,��'� � �% � r.�i ` : ,. . . ' ` �. _ •�N, . w� � V i � � ��0 ��. � ' •� � � „r � °o : � - _ � �� ,. ��s syti,� i, ,. : �r y �t Z� ' � �, - � -- - �� -.�. • :. , . �d� �� 9r J ; �., � , . .• .. , , ,{�A., �. O �•f ''�K� r� �� r�.� • nf •}i � ♦{MI i�.}1► QZ : : y� . 5,., .::+.; �` ,,� i^�e ��r � � „ � � 7 � / a ,,�„ ,, � t �j�+ � I r� Ov .:. • � � . , ., . •.i j ;.? � � y'� � � � .:.r , .;. ..•. ' (� �` h ~ . r �+`�.: � `+ .!� � t fi �� ' i � , •' f i� ; r� • • 3 . . . ' �. � a. . Qy � , � � i . • � f � � �� , S �� r � O . V� � ' � .. �� ( � ; �. i • (� � �' \: \ v 1 '•�N �� . � '�a� � .t � S ' �^-.� ' �. � O� _ .�-3 w : ' �' Y , 's. s ►s ,• �.,` . : VQ : ,; ,� • w '�. • „ „, �� O ` • a � ' � � `� � , , .o '" �ti1 yN� � `` , � . ° ' �► s . ..� , h 2 '+� � � y ti ��T � i ♦ * . - ' h �� ti+ �� • • � • �' � =� i � 4 � ` 3 � .♦ u � � � ; .t .� �, '.'� � f • 4 � ti " �' /J. � , ` ` `� �n � '� �, ' � c-� � � "' ' _ A � •�.. - � ti ` � '_._• � � • w � ti `'' Y - _� .c", �� • = Y 'rs�r +. ` — r ' , � w ., 4y �� '"r * , .� • , r .. ; � � ; o ,�-.7 w Y, • ,.r �� ' Iq� �i� " \� e ��• � � t: ''. • . .. � � A1 - � �t/vJ• y � � � �` 1s �I .l � ` �, •� ja ;S fi� � •i►,w % Yr • �� O i - � t 4 F •z � s `' 1► w • � ♦ „ \ v �,s. � � � � � �. . ... � � t w • y � r ?` .y « � ` �� : . �_ � �i2 .',�0 y . � � ` ` . � ti � =� :. � � i, � �n. ,� V Z � r ` . y` / " � � 'f#� '3'+�.� r, �. �.� .i 2. " ? � 0 , J O ` _ • � �i ` .,- � � y w � � t : � � � 0 A ` � � � � . � -: ~ w _ �' . .� ? •: `.:� � �a w F `� , � _ ` - _ � . . .; � � w� " � � �;• ` � �. \f1 � (� � �' :��rn•: �';u'y` �'.�' � '' ... ... � -- � .� .. � Q t. b - ' w:.� ` � '. �r � + � .i.r�� ` Q is �-' ..a�t \t, �/•�� i.�i `�i. r. ��. �+� � ;� .r_�e� e. 1 �� 1 \'i �� (� .� .�;• � ? � '��'o= `'• M ' i`� ��;� �r Z�r �', Z� � Ji,i��'� y i' ► R � � •` ' � �`� +,j + ~ e. ;• v, '� � �' '-/ i ; �v �~ f � w•�:• .t �/�s';' �tsi.0 I! �i �.`��f�ca.�: �� s Y�� ., . .•� � �• +,� � �r . � �� s%�� .r, �' l �/�+ a-. � ",y.. �� , 'J �� r ,��M�' „ . � y. ''i:,� � �� i�I � Ca� �' i Hr �r u �. � . / � ' i � 1 '�� •' �' t'� � �O/! 1/ wA' R �L � �s� ~ ►+d ' 1%�' �4 rw�ri i s� '�.\L �{�"� i� �'s\ �I( : r_ 'r. � y ' � • 2 - ` ' ` "= > e �' �v . ' � � ,� .: � `• ♦,� � +� w r� . t � ir '�,. . r .. , 'A •4 F� �' � ',,� �� ( i� ��` ► �� +� i . ��. � ,� � \ * � � `- �y�l �,.�,�. :oR � ° � � ' F ; ` � .s,'� v ^ ��>�,�� v � ;. a � j � � � ' /� • : � •t � �?�. f y�. -..'r'a. .�` _ 'd �,,� � , ;- � � ✓ '�►�!' . � t ;� �.: s �� ..ti . � �� ., M , p� + .`., ^ �' y 0� ` ^� ,. .� � � i � + � + � � • f .-•.. , � u��y'�*� �� r ,� � � } � "w`y ��► ♦ •�. •{. v ' � : Y � �►� �1_ \� •♦ . S V .i' ♦ � ��♦� � .ra � ' \ y /� /:v ` �r /`" � ` � >�I 1V.! � � j t �, ^ � � S • f� + I' � Z � 1/tiY , � .'. `. � ,+ � ;�.-� � y , I L ' ; t �.y ��r N K Ir —��Vr.. . a � t. �-S � ` ..►�►,� , r. s. � _ y� �.. i�. � �i. �} #► �. �>�'� � ti' ';� �� a � } v �{� � l CV 1 - � �� s �: .v ,k � •s' :.: . � � M � +� tir �c� :� � � ` _ �� _ � �° � �- � ' � ' � .. ' ` � '`g6G.`� ' ; R' �' ` •,i`. '•� �� Z � t � x3�o�a� �o �11� _ . ..... ..... .:�:� _ ... .. . �� _ � ,^ � � �, ,: � � � ,�o sl�w�� 3ldaodao� � „ . .. o -� �. -ff .� � '►" �' •-�. - = a�� v � _� O`...:�• � �' : :� •:"i� ' a �, y .,,r •; �_ � �' �� , � �� , � , '� � y. � .r �.�.. . � `` �'t �. O aR' � IrY` *T y`.• �:w i � ^ �� 1t} ^ � �� . � - ' � � Ni. "' � � �� _� F.�.�j �. 1 ti � , �� ;� .:.^w .. � . p i : �; �� `�� x3r,�; - �. :. Z `. "- �; �: . �, � . �� .!y '�� 1 � � ��!f� :�, r �S � � J ` � � _= `:. ',,, �., -A� , �� : yA � o � ' `� `^/r ; O�2 C' ti t; '�-�- -�ir� -`i, . . � � ��J- /y'� � gr. OJ � `: �^ l ,- '- r " � / ^' .. ^ V j , ., , � O�i� OO � � � �y •K/S'h,�,�y'.��_ ~ �^ e ''q� ,'~�e�K,' ?j v 5 '1 � �;' 'f '�.7' ��M � t t�.� ; � �o O ,�� • V .� �' �� r=� . � � + ��-`�� g ! r, • �'..Y � � wy •� .,. V J » V , 0 '- tw � . . . 'Y1 T�.� ' %� � � � , �♦ ,y, ;�i�. � n s � �•s �.� � �.f. � � ' � Z �'`! � Q � � �� ^ ~ �•;7 ' �r! 1 !'� ' � s� ` _ � O �� ` , „ _ � � � � , 0 Z r~?1, • r �,^� �� 2 � \,�' : v \ At ' ` V � a�,^ ^� �. � � � � • •, _ � �• �Y , � ' , a : =1�.,� ` . V Q � � •�a • w Q�- �" � � Q) : �-- �� ;t'' ID � ` . ,-� :... . Z « ��•: �J � h � M � Z 1 � i/� � � �i � � � `t ~ � � �� a 2 N = _ � 2 r'}r t, NC \ a�y j ` 'n '` y ` � ry�� • e�s�i ♦ �. ." , ,#M- 7 '� � �� ~ � N. `� � � •4 • I'A r y � _. , ��. � • ' :u �Tr � � , . �,• .. '.t _ aa, .r�� • �q� � .� , -' '" sa -- . ti , � .{► r b � ryiy. 'f " t r .i � k., . � � , �1 � y � � ~ ~ .h � � .' ..-, w � . .. � � ''�' ��' i�'IN ' � � �'7' v' Qi i ~� ' � G � �'o,r� � • � O ` ..rx.r.� ' : �\ -r �r w .: y .a i . . y r ' r/ . ♦ � � � ` i �i �3 ' wI� � b � � .,i °�° Q � t �� q �; s .: �s � , w • � ♦ „ � ; �, • p r ` �� t�.w . 7` A ' ' � ' �.. . �. �� - ~.'� s y y �V N` a a^s a� �C Z:��0 � �.-r.v • b ' • 2 �7olri ' Z ` �V Z . � � � n i W � .� '.: � � ' � � .3 -.. �. � ,��. . � � �i � � i. y �. � , � • ` . f� 3.-.� rCir...vi) � t • � . Z � � " Z . � O � J � � _ � ♦ !�� y ,��i ' y � � t,, `t��• .` Q v � Z � � w � �' ?� :. . � � �O, � , , O ` \ ' ' , ' ^ \� � • I�� • ; ` r�� y' 4 . �1 � Q ~ � ` ii +�fr N^ • .; K_�r� ��c,.�y/ , . • ... . . � • • � - � s: � �t . �` .� n • i.:.,. -�. �'O Q ,'� ar�:. .� . • • + / Z' '�i� O� . i _ ` • ./�� ' �.a < ��'' ° �t. �1l.+/�.�,,� s!� �i`� � ? : ) ^ � � .rr" � �!i Q ^ t � J +� ` �� Y �, �•� ` ` . � w ` , y � � �r� . ; � � � � �' . ,�,• �� `! 1� �, y � , �},�•�. �� y.��. !� � F 2 ,t, � e,'� , , + �,. �. . . �, � + '=-.. � ` � � .w .. ,i , \ �i, if 'Itll �iL f � !1 y�'�Ay � � � ._ v�` I '=t ��- _e /�rl� _ �Ya�. , 'S �`'+ �r . :'\ . st �� •`.�, y=•', _ j : J ' ` �i .R . ��. . } '�. 1 �kr. 1� � C r' /� � _- `�• ��i .a'�� .v�..� .f, a..� ."� ^ + - 1� �v , ,.� `O .``�� /j �v�t sr �:q� v s \ �. 'S / t-�p ' �/• a rir � t s � ��a �i"• 'O ` �a' /( .h.�:¢ //� �� . � '`Gy.t '� � y \r�� , . ►t,'= �(,' i n� ♦ • ��Ly�� f � � � ` • S� + A �Y'.� . /' •�'ti► \ ��/~ !� l� � �, �2 +� � .fc y' 'Q ti' f1, -t.. � �� ^� R y'4 �' � ,F * � � ' 49 }1 � �F�i T.'� r ��.1i�� '��i�s.�± AR� f � 1 , � ~ i 7 � e � � .L , +�� h {��.t ti„��,-i �Cr�� ^Lea- : 54� Y, • � -• � � ��-�. � f ]. . .�., �. y�e.�� ti; , �k •� � ; = � �.• � t�,��^ �• � '� : �. 4 . ' � � /y _!'% .i r � � � � M � p � •, � • _ - ° � `r i� C� ; , ��.�� ir r� ..;�+ , �~ - ij ; � � � ,�.°_ . ' '',.�\ � � :�� "z � �- • a � j .. ` � s� �' �a.�.` � .�.. ; �. p kj. � C � < < � " ^ ` ' /r�r' .,V •s � � V , ��- ' .;� � .s' � �� + .�. _ � � � � „` _ - ' v.r , . ' .�,i�:�•r � P � ,�� (+�^ � � �, ,� 7� ^ �w+.t ' !:v :r � `S 10 ^�� i ;.++. R y . - , . . • �►, ^' n' ; v `. -� � o-,- `t �, � • �� I:;i�' . `� � p ' y � a. ..y. 1• V ' ;� v ?�y� •! 7.� �r.i «_.�, r -. � R .. 'r� � �� i ` ° � if_s� ,,�. 4 t . `' �'� � 4�, �. .� �• 1 �,i i �; �� ( �V 1 •..,. E � • .� � a '; r �� •� "' h .�� 1 ��j`` �t � : _ p . � L-� � F • — ' '� I I rr 1 � : /r � � ^� � � � � � � 1 � � � � ' 4 ,�� ` � �I7C"' . � � � 1S -- r r•'' .. r�. � r' � �--,-- ;. � �G � �, � � - r � �'� s �, r, ¢� � Frx--- b ,w � �s -� J % � , I ' T � � ^� J �, . � r � ' + � M. V 1• �. �l V . \ \� ! ~ � � }� r \ '0. R � . b , �✓� � .� w � � � , r \ r^� � v ' v , , � • �-` r- �r � '' , 5 �° �W ' t �i � rt � �^ , g t [: ; •,' � '� �, . 3 � a • � ., '~ ' i h � � � r Z � � e w j� r � ,� � � J ., � r , 1 �t � ' � ~ '� "� �v �V � 'V �v :� � e � r J± � •. C��' � ti ^ � � � �7 � � ! _ Ja r = � � �' �� r'� � J �. , 1S 'Nlti � _,,. � •� x� ...,� i � r � � � �i � r.., � � •.•s• '� N1►. �J �i ; b � �y � � '� � � � 'S 'r t � •• JM �j � �' ° � � '�h � � � w w; � v, v ►• � a o � � � ` � � d � � � ° � w . � � ; � � � � . � ,,� � 1 � � � ` . � � \ ' S/J SJ � �h � � r b± i� �y, �, �,� r� t � ` � � ti k � °' ° -. � � a � y "`� y w ti ; ;; '� ; o q � y � �i�. a � °' %` �� ` �, i . � s 14 ti � � 4'_! �y rJ � r� +• ,�s�C�_"t—JL==��=�i��- -L';'r _J_ a 1 _�S'•j�. =i �T�� ►l •s Ps� ! _ �-� �j � � rJ r �.�. �+.� ' - j4T—t' � _�__1_ �' ��, T�� _ . I J 1 , ' �� i � � � � . � z � �� . , � , � � � � � "�- T--r-�--r ,—,.,�a ,. �+�'�-+-1-- � �_ �Lti wl �1'w r n��I �.� �� ti ♦ F� ti+ � � � � i_ � ��v � ir-w.'�F t� �- 1-�- L 1 �_ 1.� '� � � r ��_ I� ��. �� w �• , I w` -1_•► . ,;-.*�,r� ��„��s.j I �°"i I�'J��rj.�l�'i''�ffE�i �c�1�1- t�l , 1�_��_j•. �j �J �L�.i �) - 2► .. .� a f' ' I _ I- I I� 1� 1 i� � ► �.� �` C r` • _ `► �/ r ` \\ /'S, J � r'� .�, � /' '� •� r ,, � , � . , . H ti v :. � � + ~ � � � � � r " ✓ � �'J � � , ., � a r �v 4 y w � a . -a �. * . , ,� � � • 1 � • � ti 'b � ti h N ti M N h � � � V � '• + �r � ! \� .� ,« ,� � st •1S - � �� .. ., .. � J � �� r'J C'f r � T .' •. . .. p � �' ` � �.� • ,. � � � I ! • , � �' rG' ' �v �r. �? �Sr r� �1 ♦ ti v �. +. 6� l , ♦ •, • � ti 1 � '. .V � � 4 v w � �, : �v +, ` .� ,� � i � � . r �� ' r r �� ~ � az � � , � ;� " • �r � ` ^ � ' � , ''�, .. � � � � i ��- �%. ' � .�i, . *, .. �"�, • ` . . � . ,r � . � � � ti r � � ^ I 7a ; J w �, � w .,. � � � � � � �i� � I ~ w' �' t'` ~ 1 I1 � � r,� � ;'� h � h V M � 'r e � .�� N ti "� •� y � �� ., :, r � � ; � . � � � . �► , a � � � � � �.f •. 1S �� iC � � r G � i -. .. .� . o , 7 t r� � �� ' s � h �' � � ' � � � � � M � � �' � : � �� '1 ♦ 1n � ' .y, q � ir �, ; y � -� � � h +� • _ ;� � ` � �'f V w \ w � � � 1 * \ �r • � � � �► •s I� � ` iR � � . " • ,r r � � � 4 ' �J � � ' � i �� 3 i � �S .. ' .� r , . , � . r r-- . r- � ti N '` !, r � o �.� ♦ � }I. -� I � � J � ; � r!i '�I � Z' T � � ti ` i � 1 ` t-. � � � y ` rJ , 1 I I 1 � � ti N.� w� n w� h+'� h w � �� _ I �r rr. • � - t �� ,� . � • - -- � `� ,; : .; ., ! y. •, ,� �, � ,� < r " \ , � w �a ; .� "!' �r �i wh � ! •� / \ i V � ^ t . x :� ,� _ . ��v��. � c� � � � �� t�� .a a��-� cs�� c�� a—.� c�� G�.! �E!' � � �:� ��_� ��t� � D�'(! � �S�'_"'� ._� � � � �� 9� �'�� a:-�' �� ^� i �-�!=�r r�� , � 1 �� , : �� 61 � � � . � � � w r � � �� . � , s, o L_ _ -• � + � ; ► . • ., . • oc ,� • Hr ( � . r ,; � ^ � � � � : � e \ . '� $ � : w� � ^ � � "� ' � V L .I �i � . �'+ � : • � 1 � � • 1' L vr ►r �v p : a 1� �' �w'�, � �� . �� . t � � i ? , � �j = �. , . , W � � ..� t. � �( ; � ; � ► . • : , � .cw.�_�� . , o� .. i � w � . N \� N }.. i wv � - . a i :(st � �• � . r '� �•;.v � � \ � • � �,/� t ^ti t = Yi r v y� � � . �, � � � ♦ : vi : v' � � ! � � r .\ : : � a � i . M� ��:. � � �� i a � � •' � V1 ' I �' , t � • � • �^ � � .� a • � . .1 a � / � ` .L. � ` � w \ i 'v� \ x M : � � �1 - t� � � t � i � � H i : ^ ! � � �1M * � � : * � i � �+ y . • .. +: �s . ... °� � . • � .,,. •N '3/►d " NO1HSd '" � � i ,, . .� * • I' ♦ �1 � IM � � ,: �I \ �. � w � �. `1 '� �t � : � �l � � � : \ � • u � t � � � / � �� • � � , � . ` s � �� : �. 1 � \ � 'A' _ ' � . ..� ♦ '1 � 's �, ' vY .� � � ~ $� . w : • 'u` � � : �„ � :� y �� . �.� �" .� ♦� � � , e.� :��.� s � � �v�i � -• �• "• � ' . ,., �' � •~ �� 7 ,� � '� ' .� �' a � b � � • tV �" ' ' � �/ �^ . � 1'_. , � QT �: � •' � v�' ' , � � • ►. � : ` ' i � M � ` N �N .i'` `� •` , � �^ �`� � ; �+`� � � �`�i •. v l� � 4 . � ` � ''1 \ � � '�► � . � � , ' � : � i � � ' � ^l V . '� ♦ • � ti► .� m P : �� i � / �. R � �1 ♦ � � K v �,'�� , � � � v �� 1 S q i S� �: � �� i � h �' N v , � � ' f �.°.+ •} �. � `i A � � i . ^ 4 •-• ' � ' � Fv � : s� .Y, � � � ti t �.1 (� � • �' + q1 �1' r, � / � � � � � : � ''� : ^ O O A � ,, V 1 � � � . � � � � O q �.► ,.J; . . h.+ �+ ��•• •••� � .. . ° `` � ' W '+ � f � �� 07 � � � '� �^, �O ' � . � ' , ' • ^• ^+ + ~ + ' ` ��' , : t `` � C.. � � � �� • . , , .-. ! • .. � , � � � `C w '�Q�� : �� e.4, � � ; �� ' � " ' ` v a ,,�''. ' e ^ �r�� 'fd'�' . � � 33a1s , �ina . .. ; � o � ; r,; + `,� ^ � `� , ' � M �•' a � �. � • N , � .; :�.; � . , �,-- 3 � y � �, s � � � " o � r.a ' L'�b► _ ' � � �e � , ' . ;, y • .. : , _ �, t�, � `,C` C � �� • ` ' • �►+ ` � �' �b , � - � ,.. . � � . � ,o! . . .. ; ' ; ... h; ir ,�- v% . ��e �k � ` ; �� • I � � � , S w � •� \ . *� a �' i �\J . � • ' `'i: r a • � • �� J � ^ � � . :� � ` M �. iw ►+ . ` ^ �e ` f \ • , � : S � _ \^, � ` i w y V � �,� `-.�. �'' �� ,,•°. .�� '� ,. ti ! : � � : � - > � ..� '� � '��: � ' , ` .. o i . "�`ti � •' � � � �` � b~ ' � t • � r ` � t 4 �% t •• � i , � ` b �1 ' '/ �i ��yt o �1M i ``1 • +� ' • � `� ��1 � r� � � «� � �; .. . �� . . .. �'� . . , . � f� . .. � _ . � � a ? � 7 CITY OF FRIDLEY pLAPTNING CO�ISSION 1[BETII�i�i, lEBRIIARY 14, 1990 �.rr�. ��..►�. �.�r �.�.w r�..�.►�.�. r.r r r �..�.�r�.�.r�.w.. �.��w�.��.ww.�rwrr.�..►w��. r1►r�►/r��r��r�..�.�. �. r.�. w CA�T TO ORDER: Chairperson Betzold called the February 14, 1990, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Don Betzold, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Alex Barna, Paul Dahlberg Members Absent: Dave Kondrick Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator APPROVAL OF JANUARY 31 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to approve the January 31, 1990, Planning Commission minutes. Mr. Betzold stated that on page 5, last paragraph, 7th line, the word "everything" should be changed to "anything to him that". UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING l�YE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY liND THE MZNIITEB APPR09ED AB AMENDED. 1. 1990 COMMLJNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL: Ms. Dacy stated the proposed 1990 allocation is $104,291. Staff proposes that $70,000 be committed to the Riverview Heights project, and $33,291 be committed to Human Services. Anoka County requires $1,000 be allocated for its administrative services. Staff is recommending the Planning Commission approve the 1990 CDBG funding request. The distribution will allow the City to continue to acquire properties in the Riverview Heights Floodplain and provide year-to-year continuity in the level of funding to the Human Service activities. Mr. Saba asked if it is realistic to still call the Riverview Heights area a floodplain district. The reason he is questioning it is because of the controls at the Coon Rapids Dam and on the Mississippi River. Ms. Dacy stated that as long as it is designated as a floodplain on the flood insurance rate maps and based on the elevations, they 7a ��ING CO1+II+ISBSION lLEETING. �BB. i4. �990 _ PAGE 2 still must maintain it as a floodplain district. It is all in Zone A. Ms. Sherek stated that it might be a good idea to seek a new map from the Corp of Engineers for flood plain designation. She stated Mr. Saba is right in that there is more flood control at the Coon Rapids Dam. Mr. Barna stated that at some point after the house on parcel #6 is removed, he would like to see some type of hard surface parking area put in because the existing parking area is mud. There is a need for a parking area. Ms. Dacy stated Michele McPherson has been doing a park plan for this area for her college thesis. She stated she wouZd pass this suggestion on to Ms. McPherson to see if she can incorporate that into her plan. The Riverview Heights Park plan will be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Planning Commission, and the City Council. Ms. Dacy stated that the house on parcel #6 is being acquired now with last year's grant money. The estimated value to acquire the house on parcel #5 is about $97,00o which does not include relocation expenses. Parcel #4 will be about the same amount of money. Mr. Barna stated he would recommend that the house on parcel #4 not be acquired. It is a newer house. Zt is slightly above the elevation of parcels #5 and #6 and not as critical to the access to the park. Ms. Dacy stated that is something they can consider. Mr. Dahlberg stated it would depend on what the Parks and Recreation Commission wants to do with parcel #4• If they feel parcel #4 will not necessarily impact the park, then maybe they are willing to let that residence remain. If he owned that house, he would not mind being the only residence next to a park; and he did not think the owner of that parcel would be opposed to remaining, even though they are aware of the acquisition process. This should be discussed with the homeowner also. Mr. Saba agreed with Mr. Dahlberg that the Parks and Recreation Commission should be made aware of this suggestion to not acquire parcel #4 and see how it impacts their planning for the park. Maybe the Planning Commission can discuss this again at a future meeting. O ON by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of the 1990 CDBG funding request in the amount of $104,291 ($70,000 - Riverview Heiqhts project; $33,291 - Human Services; $1,000 - Anoka County administrative services). [� �: �»+,*'dTpO CpIQ4Ig8ION !i$$TINa. �BB. 14, 1990 PAGE 3 IIPON 71 90IC!! VOTE, 71LL VOTINQ li1YS, CHAIRPBRBOI�1 B$TZOLD DBCLARED THE lIOTION C�RRIED IINANIKOUSLY. 2. PPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OF THE FRIDLEY PLANNING COI�'IISSION F7NDZNG THE MODZFICATION OF REDEVETnpM�NT PROJECT NO. 1 1�1D TAX ZNCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 1 THROUGH 9 AND THE �gPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE MODIFIED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ...�.� T�Tr.r�L.vc�rm t.+TVaunTtdr DT nN i2FT.ATTNG THERETO; AND �lVU1P 1L1J lA!► li`�t.�i'+rir.a� � r �a.raa....ia ., a Thc^. �j1C►DL1Ji7W11Li�1, �F rb��FT1 T�X TNrRFMENT FINANCING DISTRICT �TO 10 AND THE APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED_ TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY: Ms. Dacy stated that at the last meeting, staff thought they would be creating tax increment districts for two parcels--Northco and Pro Engineering. Pro Enqineering could not consummate a purchase aqreement with Serve America. The state law for creating a tax increment district requires that the Planning Commission pass a reso2ution stating that the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this parcel as commercial. The petitioner will soon be submitting an application to rezone this parcel to C-2, General Business District. OM TION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to approve Resolution No. - i990, "Resolution of the Fridley Planning Commission Finding the Modification of Redevelopment Project No. 1 and Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 9 and the Approval and Adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan and Modified Tax Increment Financing Plan Relating Thereto; and the Establishment of Proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 and the Approval and Adoption of the Proposed Tax Increment Financinq Plan Relating Thereto to be Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City." OPON A VOICE VOTE, lrLL VOTING AYE, CSAIRPERBON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED QNANIMOIISLY. 3. L�GHT RAIL TRANSIT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET AND �RAFT SCOPING DECISION DOCUMENT: Ms. Dacy stated the memo dated February 7, 1990, went to the City Council on February 12 as an infonaation item. The City Council members were instructed to give staff a call prior to the deadline for submitting comments on the EAW by Wednesday, February 21. Mr. Dahlberg referred to page 2 of the memo, last item under Item A: "Acquisition of park and ride station sites on existing urban economic development and tax increment financing commitments". He did not see that as a completed statement. 7C pLANNING COldKI88ION MEETIN�. lEB. 14. 1990 P�GE � Mr. Dahlberg stated he would like the statement amended as follows: "The EIS will address the adverse economic implications of acquisition of property for park and ride sites on existinq urban economic development and tax increment financing commitments." Mr. Dahlberg stated that the statement made by staff for page 14, item 1.6 (page 2 of inemo), was very nicely stated. Mr. Dahlberg stated that under the "Summary", item 4(page 3 of memo), he would like it amended as follows: "Economic impact and relationship to the City's redevelopment plan, �.e loss of land far development/redevelonment and/or taken from tax rolls". Mr. Dahlberg stated he would like a little more discussion on page 14 of the Draft Scoping Decision, second bullet, last sentence which says: "In addition, in the adopted comprehensive LRT system plans for Anoka and Hennepin County, guidelines were established that call for each planning jurisdictions of municipalities to revise its comprehensive plans to reflect the adopted LRT systems..." He stated they are beinq told that this is going to happen and that the municipalities now have to revise their comprehensive plans to make it fit. What are the implications from that statement on the process the City has been going through relative to revising the Comprehensive Plan? Ms. Dacy stated "Transportation issue since it i metro area. that when the Planning Commission reviews the Chapter", the City will need to address the LRT s an adopted regional policy to pursue LRT in the Mr. Dahlberg stated that potentially the Comprehensive Plan can have a significant impact on any proposal that is made. For example, the City of Fridley might want to stipulate that in order for LRT go through Fridley, the City would require certain landscaping be done, maybe additional right-of-way be included. Maybe the City will decide they want a buffer between the frontage road the tracks. The City should be able to make recommendations to the County Rail Authority that in order to go through the City of Fridley, the City would like to make some minimum requirements relative to landscape treatments, buffers, etc., things that the City believes should be a part of the proposed plan for the system. Mr. Saba stated he agreed. The City has to take a position now. If they don't take that position in the Comprehensive Plan, then they will not have a leg to stand on. Iie disagreed that the Regional Plan overrules the local Comprehensive Plan. It was his understanding that the local comprehensive plan is a governing document. If the regional plan can take precedent over the local plan, then where it does it stop? Ms. Dacy stated the law has been changed to give the Regional Transit Board more power and strength to oversee the LRT process. 7D �LANNING COI�IIdI88ION �gTi�a lEB. 14. 1990 P�GE 5 The City can try and set some minimum standards in the Compre- hensive Plan. Another issue that is going to be critical is that the LRT planning process may precede the comprehensive plan planning process. So, the LRT planning process could be the only time they have the opportunity for input. Mr. Dahlberq stated they are talking about the visual concept in saying that the City would like to make some recommendations for minimum requirements along the LRT line. Their statement about visual impacts is: "EIS will address visual impacts of Staqe 1, and it will include an overview of future landscaping and street scaping concepts throughout the system." They will have what they deem to be their minimum requirements. However, it should be loaked at, like any code or ordinance, that those are minimum requirements. The Uniform Building Code has minimum requirements; the State of Minnesota Building Code has maybe more stringent requirements; then the City or municipality also has the opportunity to impose more stringent code requirements if they deem them to be appropriate. In this case, he thought if the City sets minimum standards and it turns out the EIS' minimum �tandards exceed dati ns atsleast for so e min B um standa ds Y and he did not recommen think that is addressed in the EIS. Ms. Dacy asked if the Commission wanted this bullet deleted from the issues that the EIS will not address, because they want it addressed. Mr��DahMaer�g staff c ne discuss th s bt asee howditnshouldSbest be f Y handled. Mr. Barna stated the EZS should be forced to look at the City's comprehensive plan, especially the development plans for the southeast corner of 73rd and University Avenue. Mr. Dahlberg stated he also felt stronqly that the issue of pedestrian traffic across University Avenue and the rail line should be addressed in the EIS. How is a handicapped person or elderly person qoing to get across the rail line on University Avenue. They are being told that the timing of the lige�s across intersection will not change. A person cannot g University Av will not be ble to cross at thi 5 intersectiont-of- way, a person _ Mr. Betzold stated the fallacy also is that right now all there is now is a bus stop, and it isn't used that much. Now they are talking about an LRT line which will encourage more people to try to get across. Mr. Dahlberg so ain lude E n any proposednplansar pedestrian bridges it should al p��,"dING COI4tIB8ION lLBLTI1dG. 1rBB. 14. 1990 Bl�GE _6 over University Avenue, specifically at Mississippi Street, potentially at Osborne Road, and possibly at 57th Avenue. The City should not have to pay for these pedestrian bridges. The LRT is compounding the problem of pedestrian traffic across that major thorouqhfare, and it is a major issue that should be included in any future plans and paid for by the LRT system. Ms. Sherek stated another point is that west of University Avenue at Osborne, it is all industrial. As soon as the LRT goes through, any vacant property will develop. 4. �989 WORKPLAN EVALUATION AND ESTABLISH 1990 WORKPLAN: Ms. Dacy stated this was postponed until more Planning Coauaission members could be present. She would like the Commission members to do an evaluation of the major issues the Commission discussed in 1989 and discuss items for 1990. Mr. Betzold stated he has spoken to the Mayor Nee, and it might be helpful to have a joint meeting with the City Council on the Sign Ordinance. Mr. Barna stated there should have been better communication between the City Council and Planning Commission regarding the Central Avenue Corridor. Mr. Saba agreed and stated there probably should have been a joint meeting at the very beginning of their discussions. Mr. Dahlberg stated the Comprehensive Plan is probably the major issues the Commission will be discussing in 1990, other than dealing with proposed development plans throuqhout the year. They should have a joint meeting with the City Council to just address the Comprehensive Plan in order for the Commission to get a good understanding and working knowledge of the Comprehensive Plan, what they perceive their goal to be for the Comprehensive Plan, and to understand the Council's concerns and desires relative to how the Planning Commission addresses the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Betzold reviewed the list of issues considered by the Planning Commission in 1989: 1. Comprehensive Plan - They do need to meet with the City Council. 2. Light Rail Transit Issues - They have done an excellent job with the little area they had to work with. They don't have the ability to make a big impact. 3. Zoning Ordinance discussions, but haphazard. Amendments - They have had some these discussions have been kind of 7E 7F pIL��+"alIldG CO��II+iI88ION !I$$TZNQ. lEB. 14. 1990 p�G� � 4. Osborne Crossings - This is now a dead issue. They did have a good discussion with the petitioner; however, the Commission might have handled the discussions a little better. Mr. Saba stated it might have been better to have had Council input in the beginning. Ms. Sherek stated that maybe when there is no opportunity for joint meetinqs on various issues, the Commission should invite the Councilmembers to attend the meetings. Mr. Dahlberg stated he has attended Council meetings; and when there is a specific issue that deals with a specific issue that the Commissioner represents, the Council will acknowledge that publicly and encourage the public to speak to the Commissioner. He stated it is interesting how the Planning Commission takes the initiative to be involved in what the Council is doing, and maybe the Council will also take the initiative to be involved in what the Planning Comniission is doing. Granted, the Council's commitments to meetings and times is much greater than the Commission's and it sometimes more difficult for them to attend more meetings; but it is a two-way street and maybe they can achieve some balance. 4. Central Avenue Corridor Study - discussed earlier 5. 1989-90 CDBG Funds - The Human Resources Commission does the most work on this. 6. Combination of the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission Mr. Dahlberg stated he still had a concern about how the Osborne Crossings project was handled. He wondered if there is some evaluation the Planning Commission can go through to say, did they react adversely to a petitioner to the extent that they left a bad taste in the petitioner's mouth. Mr. Barna stated he did not think that was the case. Maybe they need a better way to look at a proj ect and the seriousness of a developer. Mr. Dahlberg asked if there was something the Commission can learn from that particular project that will help them in reviewing future projects. Ms. Sherek stated the lesson to be learned here is that whenever a development seems too much for the property, the Commission 7G 'IpQ COiII�tI88ZON lIBETING. 1r8H. 14. 1990 P�GE 8 should be adamant about insistinq that the developer scale the project down to a reasonable leve2. Ms. Sherek stated that the Planning Commission should think about the fact that if they set up a land use that is marqinal to over- utilization of a piece of land, riqht in the beginninq where they have the controls, it is only going to qet worse. There is so little land to be developed in the City of Fridley. It is nice to qet land developed and on the tax rolls, but they do not have to develop it by putting in projects that are qoing to be problems 20- 30 years from now. �,DJOURNMENT• OM TION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Barna, to adjourn the meeting. �pon a vofce vote, all votinq ape, Cbairperson Bstzold doclared tbe February 14, 1990, Blanninq Commission neetinq adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Res ctfully sub itted, Lyn Saba Recording Secretary � � cinroF F� �� DATE: TO: C�AIiMUNtTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT' MEMORANDUM February 21, 1990 VWilliam Burns, City Manager�� FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Lisa Campbell, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Approve 1990 Community Development Block Grant Allocations A majority of the proposed Z990 CDBG funds is proposed to continue the acquisition process for one of the two remaining parcels in the Riverview Heights project area. Unfortunately, the $70,000 will not be enough to acquire either one of the two remaining properties. Anoka County is suggesting that we utilize funds from other communities for 1990 acquisition, with the stipulation that those funds must be "traded" back in 1991. As of this date, we have determined that the City of Ramsey will not be using the 1990 $26,000 allocation that it was to receive. However, that money must be returned to them in 1991. The decision as to how other funds can be acquired to consummate the acquisition of Parcel 5 is not necessary by Anoka County's February 28, 1990 deadline; however, we wanted to make the City Council aware of this issue in preparation of further action. The City Council should proceed to approve the 1990 allocations so that the $70, 000 can be reserved immediately, and so that the Human Service programming can also be kept in place hearing from other communities within the next regarding their proposed use of their funds. RECOMMENDATION . We anticipate week to ten days Staff recommends the City Council authorize application 1990 CDBG allocations as follows: 1. $70,000 for Riverview Heights 2. $33,291 for Human Services 3. $1,000 for Anoka County's administrative fee M-90-112 7H 71 RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS PARK DEVELOPMENT CDBG PROPOSAL FY 1990 City of Fridley 7J RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS PARK DEVELOPMENT Project Overview The Riverview Heights Neighborhood was designated a Neighborhood Strategy Area on March 8, 1985, and prioritized as one of three primary focus areas for neighborhood revitalization. The neighborhood is located in northwest Fridley along the Mississippi River. It is one of the older neighborhoods of Fridley with its original plat dating back to the late 1800's. In April of 1965 and then again in 1969, devastating floods hit a portion of this neighborhood. In 1975 and 1976 the City initiated flood control regulations which regulated those lands located in the flood plain. The neighborhood has two flood classifications--floodfringe and floodway. A majority of the area is classified as floodfringe which allows limited construction provided the flood construction regulations are met. The floodway section allows no construction except public construction as restricted by regulation. This ongoing project involves eliminating residences from the floodplain section of the neighborhood. CDBG Activitv The proposed project includes the continued acquisition and relocation of properties and improvements in the Riverview Heights flood plain. This year FY 1989 Council has allocated $69,236 to this project. The property to be acquired is shown on the attached map as Parcel 7. Fundinq Summary Total 1990 CDBG Project Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . $70,000 Project Duration The project for which CDBG monies are committed will be completed in 18 months of project approval. Goals of the Project 1. To help remove slum and blight in the area. 2. To create a multi-use park facility to serve the recreational needs of the neighborhood and the community. 3. To better utilize a significant natural resource. 4. To continue to upgrade the total Neighborhood Strategy Area. Proiect Contact Person Lisa Campbell, Planning Associate, City of Fridley, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 7K PUBLIC AND HUMAN SERVICE FUNDING CDBG PROPOSAL FY 1990 City of Fridley 7L PUBLIC AND HUMAN SERVICE FUNDING Prolect Overview The City of Fridley in its effort to provide needed services to its residents is providing assistance to groups who (1) provide service to predominantly lower income people; (2) need funding for facilities, supplies, operating expenses, or staff time, but not construction; and (3) seek CDBG funding which will not substitute for previous regular funding from City of Fridley which was not CDBG monies. CDBG Project Activitv The project activity being proposed in this application involves the funding of service groups who have taken out applications with the City. Applications will be ranked based on the funding priorities of the City and qualifications of the HUD CDBG guidelines are satisfied. Funding Summarv Total 1990 CDBG Project Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $33,291 Pro�ect Duration The project for which CDBG monies are committed will be completed in 18 months of project approval. Goals of the Project l. To maximize the benefits to the citizens of Fridley from the limited resources available for public and human services funding. 2. To cost effectively provide public and human services that might not otherwise be provided through the public sector. 3. To provide a means of responding to the changing needs and interests of the community. Proj ect Contact Person Lisa Campbell, Planning Associate, City of Fridley, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, MN 55432 � � c�nroF F�� DATE: TO: C0�IILMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEM4RANDUM February 20, 2990 '�William Burns, City Manager Jim Hill, Acting City 1�Ianager� FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Lisa Campbell, Planning Associate SIIBJECT: High Quality Office Paper Recycling The City of Fridley had a h�gh quality office paper recycling program from June 1985 until May 1989 when Super Cycle collapsed. Roughly 250 tons of high quality office paper were recycled during that period. Staff has met with Warren Winkelman of Aagard Sanitation regarding the implementation of an office paper recycling pro . y v; W��,,�an informed staff that Aagard Sanitation can . ��". �, p � . , . ... �� C�t--u o . � ,.:+ct�'��1�'� . ,�i�', $�� .~'El�t� <='p�"��]'�� Th i s �.� , ;. fii►is cost will be reimbursed by the � � �" ._: � � :� + �no�ca County grant.� Estimated annual tonnage is 82 tons. Last fall when the City bid the curbside recycling service, staff included pick-up of the City's office paper under Option B. All of the bids listed in Attachment A came in above $35.00 per month. Staff requests that Council autho��.ze �he City Manager to execute a contract for service with ��7c� &�t��,'t�tf�t� .�t a start-up cost of $72.57 in March� �nd �$35.b0"� "per mon�h` `th��eafter for a total annual cost a� ;��t±�'i:-��, :� Start-up cost includes the cost of 13 desktop boxes �o supplement our current supply of boxes. LC:ls M-90-105 0 A ttad�u�nt A BID PROPOSALS FOR CITYIPIDE COLLECTION OF REBIDENTIAL RECYCLABLES FRIDAY� NOVEMBER 17, 1989 2:00 P.M. BID COMPANY BOND Browning Ferris Ind. Safeco 9813 Flying Cloud Dr 5$ Eden Prairie, MN Gallagher Serv.,Inc. Cashiers 1691 - 991st Ave NE check Blaine, MN $3,612.00 Ramsey Recycling,Inc Cashiers P. O. Box 6 check Newport, MN $3,000.00 Super Cycle, Inc. Cashiers 775 Rice Street check St. Paul, MN $500.00 Waste Management,Inc American P. O. Box 9 Int. Co. Circle Pines, MN $10,800.00 Metro Refuse Inc. P. O. Box 375 No bid Savage, MN BID A $2.20/H.H. $250/ton $0.86/CDV BID B No additional charge No additional charge $s�.00/ton Ss�.00/ton $84.00/ton $150.00 base monthly min. $84.00/ton $3,800.00 $2.35/H.H. No bid No bid � No bid : � � � cinroF F�� Dl1TE : TO: FROM: CCJ11/IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART'MENT MEMORANDUM February 22, 1990 �� William Burns, City Manager Jock Robertson, Community Development Director SIIB.7ECT: Resolution Modifying Fridley Redevelopment and TIF Plans to Establish TIF District No. 10, Northco - Phase III Northco is proposing to purchase and develop the 2.4 acre site between the University Avenue frontage road and University Avenue immediately south of 73rd Avenue (Phase III). This parcel is located in an area in which the City has actively promoted development and redevelopment. The new facility will provide approximately ��;��t� �t�i�rt"''f+��t of '�c��e�� '+n� �€��; In addition, approximately ��' e.�atg2t�'y�ertt p�sit3'� �+will be relocated into the City, thereby providing additional consumers for existing retail and restaurant facilities. The project will also add ov+er �� `+��-t��i_:s��va��e�it� �c► � ��t��i�� ' il��-• / ..�� 4�� ._ ... , . . . � ' . . - . In order to proceed with the development, substantial soils correction is required. The need for tax increment is to assist in this increased cost and help provide the public assistance which makes this development possible. Without tax increment assistance, the project as proposed on this site would not be economically feasible and would not proceed in the foreseeable future. ,��.. .., - � The developer is ��.��i � �►�` any similar soil� .P'� � �. . . re;r��` �ti�", �r:� or ��'° �i�`�S3"�"""C'�'�'"�'�±�� _ Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution Modifying Fridley Redevelopment and TIF Plans to Establish TIF District No. 10, Northco, Phase III. JR:ls M-90-124 �J CITY OF FRIDLEY COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. . � A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT N0. 1 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT COSTS AND INCREASED GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND MODIFYING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 1 THROUGH N0. 9 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT COSTS AND INCREASED GEOGRAPHIC AREA WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT N0. 1; AND ESTABLISHING PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT N0. 10 AND APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Fridley, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. It has been proposed and approved by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") that the Council modify Redevelopment Project No. 1 to reflect increased project costs and increased geographic area and approve and adopt a Modified Redevelopment Plan relating thereto, pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time. 1.02. It has been further proposed and approved by the Authority that the Council modify Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 9 to reflect increased project costs and increased geographic area within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and approve and adopt Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans relating thereto, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time. 1.03. It has been further proposed and approved by the Authority that the Council approve the establishment of proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 and approve and adopt the proposed Tax increment Financing Plan relating thereto pursuant . � to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time to time. 1.04. The Authority has caused to be prepared, and this Council has investigated the facts with respect thereto, a Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 reflecting increased project costs and increased geographic area; Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 9 reflecting increased project costs and geographic area within Redevelopment Project No. 1; and a proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10, defining more precisely the property to be included, the public costs to be incurred and other matters relating thereto. 1.05. The Authority and the Council have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the modification of Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan relating thereto; to the modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 9 and the approval and adoption of the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans relating thereto; and to the establishment of proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 and the approval and adoption of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto. 1.06. The Council hereby determines that it is necessary and in the best interests af the City and the Authority at this time to modify Redevelopment Project No. 1 to reflect increased project costs and increased geographic area and to approve and adopt the Modified Redevelopment Plan relating thezeto; to modify Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 9 to reflect increased project costs and increased geographic area within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and to approve and adopt the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans relating thereto; and to establish proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 and to approve and adopt the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto. Section 2. Findinas. 2.01. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the assistance to be provided through the adoption and implementation of the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan are necessary to assure the development and redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No. 1. 2.02. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan conform 2 9C to the general plan for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole in that they are consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. 2.03. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development and redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise and it is contemplated that the development and redevelopment thereof will be carried out pursuant to a redevelopment contract with a private developer. 2.04. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the modification of Redevelopment Project No. 1, the modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 9 and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 and the approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment P1an, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and a proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto by the City is intended and, in the judgement of this Council, its effect will be to promote the purposes and objectives specified in this Section 2 and otherwise promote certain public purposes and accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan. 2.05. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 constitutes a"tax increment financing district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 9, and further constitutes a type of "economic development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12. 2.06. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the proposed development or redevelapment in proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. 2.07. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the City made the above findings stated in this Section 2 and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans, the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan and Exhibit A of this Resolution. Section Proiect No. 1 Redevelopment 3. Approval of the Modification of Redevelopment and the Approval and Adoption of the Modified Plan RelatinQ Thereto. 3 . � 3.01. The modification of Redevelopment Project No. 1 reflecting increased project costs and increased geographic area and the approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan relating thereto are hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. Section 4. Approval of the Modification � Tax Increment Financina Districts No. 1 throuah No. 9 and the Ap�roval and Adoption of � Modified Tax Increment FinancinQ Plans Relatinq Thereto. 4.01. The modification of Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 9 reflecting increased project costs and increased geographic area within Redevelopment District No. 1 and the approval and adoption of the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans relating thereto are hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. Section 5. Aporoval of the Establishment of Proposed Tax Increment FinancinQ District No. 10 and the Approval and Adoption �f the Proposed Tax Increment FinancinQ Plan Relatinq Thereto. 5.01. The establishment of proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the approval and adoption of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto are hereby approved and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley. Section 6. Filin4 of Plans. 6.01. Upon approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan (collectively the "Plans"), the City shall cause said Plans to be filed with the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. Adopted by the Council of the City this 26th day of February, 1990. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: 4 Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATION I, Shirley A. Haapala, the duly qualified Clerk of the City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council on the 26th day of February, 1990. Shirley A. Haapala, City Clerk 5 9E 9F EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, are as follows: 1. Finding that proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 is an "economic development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12. Proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 consists of 1 parcel of land which qualifies as an economic development district under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12. 2. Finding that the proposed development or redevelopment, in the opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. City staff has reviewed the available financing costs for the development including soils correction costs. Due to the high costs of soils correction, the project would not be financially feasible without the City's assistance. 3. Finding that the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission of the City of Fridley has reviewed the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 and has determined that the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 conforms to the comprehensive plan of the City. 4. Finding that the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development or redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise. The project to be developed (an office and commercial facility) will be located within proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 10 and will consist of a building providing office and commercial space and will provide 25 jobs. � � � cinr oF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: COl1ItMUNI"i'Y DEVELOPMENT DEPART'MENT MEMORANDUM February 22, 1990 t/William Burns, City Manager�� Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Approval of a Resolution Approving a Plat, P. S. #90-01, Northco Business Park 2nd Addition Attached is the resolution approving a plat, P.S. #90-01, Northco Business Park 2nd Addition, with the stipulations recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution with the following stipulations to be included in Exhibit A of the resolution: 1. 2. 3. Storm water calculations shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both parcels prior to issuance of a building permit. A separate ponding easement(s) shall be dedicated by separate document prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Payment of park dedication fees prior to issuance of a building permit. MM/dn M-90-115 �o RESOLUTION NO. - 1990 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT, P.S. #90-01, NORTHCO BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Plat, P.S. #9a-01, on January 31, 1990 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council also conducted a public hearing on the proposed Plat at their February 12, 1990 Council meeting and approved the Plat at their meeting; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley hereby approves the Plat, P.S. #90-01, Northco Business Park 2nd Addition, with the stipulations attached as Exhibit A, and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Plat as prepared by Sunde Land Surveying Inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the petitioner is requested to record this Plat at Anoka County within six (6) months or said approval with become null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THI5 DAY OF , 1990. ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK r � . WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR Exhibit A Robert Larsen Partners Northco Business Park 2nd Addition P.S. #90-01 1. Storm water calculations shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both parcels prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. A separate ponding easement(s) shall be dedicated by separate document prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Payment of park dedication fees prior to issuance of a building permit. � , Gv�^'� -- �� ol�c�u-�., , � � 0 1 : �� a a� �o >j � u°u Z O � � � Q z N � � � _ I �t•, W�y ` � � m O U Z � � O Z 5s� { i F�o t �t� = i�� ; �?� : ��j � i3r � � � � ��: � �� ' � i i -p3� � a i� � � i' � - R _3 � q :�� ` �� Y �} � Q s: � 4 �t� � 3 �F- - a �� j� ��G` 4 �� XEN� 0 f:�� % Y5 �:�i � �3 ��e � ,� rl�� 3 Y�� }, �i�� ti � � !L �i � � i� � � i= � 5 5 �' � 3 I � ' 1 � �t � � � i i ��. 3 ! •`.,� � I � � w � ��' : � � / .z � � a i s � � I r � �,s a �:��t�� . � I � �I �� I � � .I ^,�� i� _s �' k� � � I • ( 7�� t =t �`� � tl ra �= d�. r = '� `s r + �. �a �5 da� �� c ��- +S 2t � j i �� si �i s�;p is it 1ai i � r • �� :.�� W $ 0 s� Ll': \=i � ' � I � __ s:_ ; �/ 3g�D.`•Z� �'� -- OYBLf M,►0,1f.OS QS �__ �� -, } - _ � o . J _—_� 3N0� � I�/ �, =_� d. i s � �� ,� k ,; L 1 N � �i ��_ o I� ' ii I ` j e I � J ��( �` f r�y-- -� 133tliS Wq �j�: ANONdV1Atis �b �� _I_ N I_" fl-' i_t" F, i' � � `-' J 0 �� s� �i � i� d: � {C � � �� 6: n �� : � � �� ! f �s . n �I� �, t 1 Q i� ii l� .� i � � RI� � I? 3� SI Y� ti �� rlg- bb � • C G � t � I� =1 i� i 9 t�� b� � � _ ! � i � �I- !b � G� � �, �:; �_, :; s: ..� =� �-- �_ �,- n--.�[ i)_',�- ��= cc b p'-;� ,w pc,ra.oas�aw � \• Sj;�e4oe•a ' e'°" �'�J OO:COG•tl •osos•� � �„�s.u.ci•v 1 £O�ZL ; � " M1,99 91.►9 N ' ` �_� ; " M,94,i1.6Y N � LiJ 4'�,, ,, c__ - ��Oaa. .__ -� •r, �,- � ,_ �, .� s M..� �_ aA 1 -er,��-\ _�� J�� .' {,i�, � ( � �� \ ' � � `:�> � fi G a zN \rr�\ 41�: � C� ,`� H� `-� ( o�� "m I2 `,� (�` \ •�'\��^ •�4�� l O ll' j� '-� ��- �I' \ °° i : b� • ; J 'r a; Ll. I rlI_ —� , \ ��; �� f �_=_ I I ll: i: \2 fi �\_ � ---- �� i _ l � `= `a•�••�a•p--' 0►'py • 1. \� 3.00,IC.CN �N1,�Iji9.ON L� � �� i: _ 's Y E � x� t 6 � F I� �` :, Ri� ;� : � zi8 =3� I� i E � i� � � e I � G� I f ��t .o$ �_� s �� t �:� � �=i � !�s le s�a ! pppf sI� 6 p' .� �� SbY •� t i�€ � s: !gS � Y�f Ff� i �=` e I ��3' F$ t�ii Y' � �� :�" 3ak S! d�$ �i c:i � �' �r� _ �� a.8� '� �� : : � ��I ��; . �� " °'� «N �° n � e ; �Mi '=i ii �i� S;i �o �els �F=t =�9 ��i °' I lI E�� itail,'� ga8 8� •'� . -Z ,` �l� ` E43i `' I ;_; `�` - �� _�_ ^:�� i� �� fY i�_ ��:a S ci •5 �; :� M �' . e° <� G � ■ : . ` i � � r . � : e 8 I' l. v o� f � � � � � C /�1I • m � � �r � � � _v � � � � � b � � € s �z� a g j iei f �� • .i�' � � � ii� � � i�� : �f� RI I9 � 9 _� �� I � . F8 i� 3�a . �I �� 1 � � ` �I E � I� _-�� $&�� : i � IY�� ,I � � 1': � F,� � r a�. � � � � ��; � f r =:a$ - : � � :,_gE � : � G E L9: G. E � � '-J � 1 -1 �� "� d,i'� � ` � '1 � P � i ( '� iJ =Sf ii'J=1; ` J �, 1�:�.�=1r',!'',tr �1 � 1-� �j �� i'� i 1 f-' i�i'� j_ i�� i__i `.� f� �� I '�' �� ._I,� ,_,i,� i�,v;v � �._.I� � ;��.I ��-�- -��-��--�-' S� �9 k. .''s oc >a nZ 2a � LL 0 4y e� >Z �� :J �U � �I � _ I W Z � �/�� W O � � � � �11 I � �`J �?�__ I � - ,' -- I � � a �i N � I O � / s � _ ^—\I ! �• __ _ ' N ' '� : 1G _ � ' I t O �� M� �—> �/ . „ "^ ) _.. � `.t +� • ` ��\ ` ; I � { _ " � �� 3O• — I �,..,o �_/ ._.�N10 R.:.�f_,-�,-: ...1� - Iz __�, O � -- I m I w 0 �� I � �T c� � W T t N .� ✓ O � 8 '. ' I � �� „ _ I o� I ` s �� I ��I WN I� -�_ �1=:A . �� e�h . � R.� .-• . � � : (' ° =J � �, : � a I I �, o �_ � � �_ ' I I I _ ._J I _ �- \p •�`•`•�� . �o? �o' p d�rfy } -'�_ \ d �9'� \ _ �oo,i ° sN - _- � �_ � . $ Z —c —�—� $ - _ �o $ 1M � - - -- ,'�- , � ,-, ' � i--� " , � -- -� J ✓--., . i � �, ;� � � 4 i ? ♦ v, i n � C �I n � F V 4 �' 3 V �_ eQ� � .�� a7�W Y X 6 �� s i ' +�Q � i. �S� � N�m 3r �Q� g _ $:i� � A N N � r- F; ;� ;r 0 C�]!� - �oE � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE �� PLAIV�V(' COIv1�►MSSION DATE : January 3 t, 1990 f[ZlDLEY C(TY OOl�1CIL DATE : February 12, 1990 AUTHOR MM/dn REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOC A710N SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES di ZONiVG UTI.JTES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FMVANCIAL NVlPLlCATiONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREh�JVSNE PLAN COMPATBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES � ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL C�NS�ERATIONS STAFF RECOMMEI�ATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANN�IG COMMISSION REC.ONMMENDATiON P.S. 4�90-01 Robert Larsen Partners To replat Lot 2, Block I, Northco Business Park, into two separate parcels. 73rd Avenue and University Avenue 7.6 acres M-2, Heavy Industrial M-2, Heavy Industrial to east, south, and west; R-1, Single Family to north Available to site Split required by lender for phased construction of office/warehouse complex Yes Yes Approval with stipulations Approval with stipulations Staff Report P.S. #90-01, Robert Larsen Partners Page 2 10F Request The petitioner is requesting to replat Lot 2, Block 1, Northco Business Park, into two lots of approximately 3.7 and 3.9 acres each. Ordinarily this can be achieved by a lot split, but because the property is torrens property, Anoka County would not record the lot split descriptions. Therefore, a replat is required. Site The parcel is located at 73rd Avenue and University Avenue, with frontage along both the service road and 73rd Avenue. The site is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, with the same on the east, south and west. R-1, Single Family Residential zoning is across 73rd Avenue to the north. Analysis Platting of the Northco Business Park was completed in March of 1989. The petitioners are proposing to construct the first phase of a one-story office/warehouse building. The lender for the construction financing would not authorize a loan for the entire parcel, but only the area necessary for the first phase. This dictated that a separate legal description had to be created. Issues concerning architectural standards, landscaping requirements, and storna water management were addressed in the development agreement approved with the original plat. The proposed structure is to be a one-story structure of brick finish, with bronze glazing accents. The proposal requires that many of the existing trees on the site be incorporated into the landscape plan, with the addition of additionaZ trees appropriate to the area. A bikeway/walkway is proposed for along the west property line. Additional parking lot screening is needed along the south and southwest portions of the site, but the remainder of the parking area should be adequately screened. The joint driveway will occur along the north property line between the two lots, and will allow access for both phases of the project (see attached map). Provisions are being made to manage the storm water runoff. Easements are proposed along the east property line (see attached map) and the City Engineer has requested the storm water calculations to ensure adequate retention area. Staff recommends that joint driveway easements and the proposed ponding easements be filed. Staff can find no negative impacts to the proposed subdivision. 10G Staff Report P.S. #90-01, Robert Larsen Partners Page 3 The second phase will be a"mirror" image of phase one. The delivery access to the rear of the buildings will continue to 73rd Avenue. This access was approved as part of the original plat process and may also be shared with the parcel to the east. Therefore, ultimately, there will be a circular traffic pattern around the building. Even if the site was sold to a different owner, that project would have to utilize the joint driveway and address the ponding arrangement at the rear of the building. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the replat request, P.S. #90-01, with the following stipulations: 1. Storm water calculations shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Joint driveway easements shall be filed against both parcels prior to issuance of a building penait. 3. A ponding easement (s) shall be dedicated on the plat or by separate document prior to the issuance of a building permit. 4. The landscaping plan shall be revised to include additional screening at the southwest corner of the site. The revised site plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuance of a building permit. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council with one additional stipulation: 5. That the issue of the joint driveway over the lot line be resolved prior to the City Council public hearing. STAFF UPDATE Section 205.18.03.D.2.a requires the building setback to be 30 feet from the side lot line if a driveway is proposed between the building and the lot line. The Planning Commission wanted a determination on whether or not the building had to be 30 feet from the lot line where the joint driveway is located, instead of 20 feet as it is proposed. We conferred with the Building Inspector and the City Attorney. We determined that the building could be 20 feet from the lot line as is proposed. The intent of the above cited section is for Staff Report P.S. #90-01, Robert Larsen Partners Page 4 driveways entirely on one property. This driveway is located on both properties. Further, a joint driveway is penaitted by Section 205.18.5. Therefore, we believe the proposal is not contrary to the intent of the ordinance. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the request, P.S. #90-01, with the stipulations as recommended by staff. 10H m P.S. 4�90-01 Robert Larsen Part• 1 0J .� • , - - .. . .. � . �� '",' - �' , _ ' � - . - sw wiwis ;<7" " . . . . -- - - - : � __--_��--_-_��,.��..�� - '+ - ` . • , i i ��1 ��YT� ��' " . . � � �:��s•,.r�r±.. 1�+ � : ` i�E Ptr�nrlr,� cEiAU. • .�: _��: ,l �. / � � r��]{..e.�... �:� .. . .. -' � e �! � , �� l��'��t �1' � . . . , w�°`� _ O / . 1 yc�'��! � j � . � . • � �"�..r"... c� � . .. ' ��' '.11 � - . . . . .. .`� .+:+`� �i.r . / � •�. �•J�� , �;� . ^ � � Ir iW� Ih� \,t.:' . . ( — ` i / / '!"� . 1� f w ' , ." . w�......r� , �.. � 4 � ; � � „�^'~� ,.: � �� . !. -, '� - . . �� .e � : �' � ��r.er.. i � i � , � � ::::."::.�"'....`°"' � -' � .:_'� .'. I � . :. �=:� � , - :/- / / ��i�� l. •_ �/ ` . T . � a..�%. �°,"`�'� � - / i � / � � / � , � i / � � � --� ..,..� � � i � � . s�s Pu►rmNC oer�a , . I � �/ / � ' � err� ' '�� i � •,. � � r �, � 1. . � ; _.lr� � . � . . � ..,� `'F `L. ' .� ...�r�.,. i� ,✓�� Proposed ponding area, � easement(s) required. � � ; �—�--- �� - - . - - . � , _,..,, ��::;= . , ii , '!'�'• � - • . - � � i � ��. . s. ------ -�---- - " i; "��s�c�o� . ' �tMCb asvi � . -- -. *=: :; � - ., . } ;; : ` . ; , � t;_ , . , •. . � :,: _ , P.S. �d90—01 Robert Larsen Part. � OK LOT SPLIT OF: • UNtVERStTY AVENUE BUSINESS CENTER FOR: , THE ROBERT LARSEN PARTNERS Joint driveway. >I � �a >I zl �I �I � i- -__ � - � u . r •�. • • N '�'�� .�... . —�.-s % SITE PLAN _r.' �`�`-� ��^ , ....� � � �ww� i�o� �u � � �. �""Z'C'.M.«� ..�:' i �:MI1 ��` 1 L P.S. �90-01 Robert Larsen Part. I ' a `ti: ' , � ,tt � ,� f �i � �L�� !� ;� `� i�� _ .,�� ,�� :!� s� �;; • �� j �n�� ; t�_! #�� , . �i' �it 11i1 ��i �� i � �! '�`_ i 1 �tf 1��l. • ; � ii f'' 11� EI �i� �E�l�1, . � . .,,�.:: _ . . , . . ...: . . . , . . ' . , � y y . _ • _r. _f . . - _ Y !��. �4 :+.l..i.�, •�t `�. �. `. M � �"�' I , .�.. . : :.. ' . . . '• ' _ r • •:' �l . r �y1 .iFE� .� .. i i"r •�` � �M�o' � t� � �r.., i . ._.� . j• _ _ .. • ♦'1l�. - . -�ti-+-� :� � . 'M�"N'� : l.y �=.��.� �i.�.. r.! J�.1+�.�'.�� • ♦.� •. �-. .,; a . ` � I Y � . _ , „�,y� p... •! � • 4. 2 -� - 1 ` ,t: `.'.�,�� .* � . .R•.. �.�'' . -f �'� � _ L �. ��, • :�;��4a�� •;,�i- ` �v v<'� . � � ' ' � . 'T, .�. .�1.. T`� : . , . . . , .., � � = _. �h�� - . . . - . .. � . ' � � � � � .. � � .\ , � �� i � r. � � - t • . � . . `� , r . t . .. Y�yi �'t'. Y� i"r� ��l \ - F � 1 ." '�' �� " .. 1_ r� I � � � � � � � J � ' � � � � � r � - ,� � . • � �� t . � � ♦ ` : . � , � • '. , `��- , y�r�•':� !, �'��( � V�' � . .111 .. f�'�+r�.r� .��.+�.3"�:'i ��vr� � s ' �. .� � :5't�`T.�f',�iaZ�?�� , -V � � :i �� I = , . i,�.� '` ,4..i` ` � : J,+, \�` - "' y.''� -. �f L � ..�tct -.M� }, �•. k: \� .4% ..�i.` �. ,�.:.t .. t •�ti� e�, a�.' � � i F.• l��• 1 : �� ; lr.� ,tr•�� :'- _ '��i�.�j � aj�"�,�.�•� �. ' u.�� 1 �'y ifn �3 �+.. \+ v.�ii�• .� ' �a ..r8!+'�•,.� •�'�i�'..��4' • '�k� • ►�,�`�r-� �`d"•t,,1� � �r' '�.r �T �� 1 Lr �_�•�� -�..� r.�re.� ' �'Y� v �� ' � w. r � j " ) 'ti. '*i -,.a �v _i: `i til+'•tj,�' •r ; •� ~' . '�.'�h•, , i.>� y � - . �, • . , • . ... I � . x . . . ' s> � �.` . . ; ' . ``;`,. ' . � � 1 � � ``�� `, • � • . 1 � � � ( '^ 'w : - � `� . , ` .. , " . 1 � � �. � � �. �`� - . . • ; • . . _. `��` ` •� � . ; _ . � ' `` `` . 1 �� i '� �� _ _ ```��\'\ �� ♦ `►�� ' , " . . �� ♦ . �` . .`` � � � . � ` � � ``\ `` . ' . _ 1 . \ �. � � � _ = . � - . � \ �` . , , _ _. �..:. ' � ' . . . . . . • \ • � � � � � • � � ( ' � . ' , �� 1 � . . _ � \ � •—. - � , �. ri�. . ' : � L _� _' l' ' ':} �! t 1 1 ; : ! : t� ; • ��• I'�� '' I�� . !'; , � � � �� ' - i � i ��i I�i.-sY,�+� I `� � I-'•!�`� .. ., r��i;;�iE�;��, '�� 'ii�� "�� .�j �a:# �� jU�' � � �� y � ! •% � - � 2 ♦ i..: ; � .-!,'i�<e . -e�....��.. � . ' . �! " � .- :i •_S.. : � . ._...�.�t_��_ __ . �� . � �i i � � � � - tr°M.�. cJ-'��:' - _ . ' .� r. _ . . .r-:KY:P� .�41:~� '.i�'. . ... • j� � I ��. � -.-• ' . �.. .. ��.. r.• 4.: �! �` -1`��, � �'..�'. 1�� { � . ..q .___�.._ _� .�.. �• 8 ..�.�,� �,,, ...,....r.�. . i � i _ . �, ..:_.. �! . iiGi�� '�� _. � ' . . �� i�� 1 .,.-� �._� ,._..�_..._ P.S. 4i90—01 �e�� '1� �� i; �� , • , � � !� � �, � a � � _� . � _ � �m � +}� ��,i � �� L , � � �!; ,' i t i3� �� - �t b� s� • �. �i�t � ;�p� a . � j„ �< . i�E I a � � jl�� : ili� �• �f��lt �;� � il��i� �11 �� ' . - � . � ' � . � .. • . - ... .. - . � - _ . � : /C�t1:i'. . . . . . . I. • . " . .. . � . c�.��ks streer5 Mainf��n.+nce MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager � P PW90-62 FROM: John G. F1ora,��Public Works Director Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Works Director �� DATE: February 14, 1990 SUBJECT: Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 1 (Overlay) Attached is a resolution ordering the improvement, approval of plans and authorizing advertisement for bids for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 1(Overlay). � � �� .�� w; �� ,� � This project includes the placement of the K�� r"4y�';��, �, the following streets: '��"'� : ��ek Park I�ne 1 A portion of 66th Avenue Hickory Street - 78th to 79th Avenues Heather Place Heather Circle �.,,- The engineering estimate is ��.�QQ.�Funds are available within the City's Street Maintenance��lccount. Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution. JGF/MAW/ts Attachment 11 'F_ �� • R'B80I�t'IQ�I I�U. - 1990 •�s:. � . .;•..:�• � �:�- � �• •. � s �:� •.. . .,- �� •,vv:,�• ■ � � :,�•� :�. i:� ��;• : 1�; v:�' � r •,• � s i:� • • � � • � • � ;, � • Ix7W, �, HE IT I�80LVED by the City Oonu�cil of the City of FYidley as follcyws: 1. Z3�at it ap�e.a_� in the i:rite.rests of the City arid of th�e pz�opezty aar�ers affec.�ted that there be aoa�struc.�ted vertain i�rove�ner►ts to-wit: Street inQrave7nents, includin4 9��J, stabilized base, hot-mix biti.munous mat, voncr�ete curb arid gutter, sidewalks, water aryd sanitary sew�er servioes, storm sew�er syst�m, ar�d o�ther facilities located as follows: AI�L O�t PORTI�B OF: w•�:��+� �- r: • :� � :� �+��•� v�+- :i�•• r'�:�• . �_ :I:�� :I:rl' M�'.N ' That the w�rk involved in said i.mprovements listed above shall hereafter be de.signated as: BTti�I' p!�►7EC,T I�U. 8T. 1990 - 1 1. The plans and specifications prepared by the P�blic Works Deparbment for such i�rove�nent ard each of theai, pursuant to the �ncil action heretofore, are he.r�,i�y approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. 2. The wnrk to be perfoYmed w�der SZR�ET II�i�JVH�TP PI�J►TEL'P I�U. Sr. 1990 - 1(t7VERLAY) be perforn�ed under one oontract. The Public Works Direct.or shall a000rd.ingly prepare atxi cause tA be insert.ed in the official newspaper advertisement for bids upon the making of such i�ravements wzder such approved plans arxi s�ecifications. �e advertisc�ne.nt shall be published for twn (2) week.s (at least 10 days), ar�d shall specify the w�rk to be done ar�d will state that bids wi.11 be apex�ed at 11:3o a.m. on Are�esday, March 28, 1990, in the Cau�cil C�ambpxs of the City Hall, and that no bids will be voa�.sidered unl�ss sealed arid filed with the Public Works Direc..•tor at�d acc�panied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or oertified check payable to the City of FYidley for five peroent (5�) of the amau�t of such bid. 'Ihat tt�,e advertise�ment for bids for STt�Er II�ROVEI�TP PiaO►7ECT 1�• 1990 - 10 shall be subst,antially standard in foYm. 2_151� i• � �• ' :r�� :I' M •�'ll M� •1' �:1' M •)' ' �� :� : . �' �� T • ' ;�I-1•III• '� ' � WILLIAM J. NEE - 1�,YOR � 11A �;.�w �. ,. :�...:.�: �ET II�V�TP Pl:J�7�L'P l�D. S!'. 1990 - 1 Sealed bids will be Y�eoeived azd publicly cpet�ed by the City of FYidley, Anoka O�o�mty, Mirn�esata, at the offioe of the R�blic Works Direct�or, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Mirn�o�ta, 55432, (Tel. 571-3450) oaz the 28th day of March, 1990, at 11:30 a.m. 1, 650 Zbn I�J 2331 - Z�x 41 Asphalt pavirg 1,600 G311� TdCk oo3t 7 Each Adjust gdte v31ve booa� 17 Each Adjust mar�hole castinqs All in aoo�xdar�ve with plans ar�d specifications prepared by Jc�hn G. Flora, P.E. , Public Works Director, FYidley City Hall, 6431 University Avernse, N.E., �7idley, I�1, 55432, (Te1. 571-3450). 11B Plans ar�d specifications may be e�min�d at the offioe of the Rablic Works Direct.or arid c�opies may be otytairied for the �ntractor's irr3ividual use by applyi.r�g to the Public Worl�s DirectAr ar�d ciepositing with the Public Works Dir�ectAr $50.00 for each set. ZYie deposit will be reftur.�d to each bidder suiinittiryg a bona fide bid ug�On return of the docnm�ents in c�ood �ord.ition within ten (10) days frcm the bid openir�g date. Bids must be made � the basis of cash paya+ent for work, and aooa�aanied by a ca.sh cleposit, oertified c3�eck (on a resporLSible bank in the State of Minne_�ota) or a bidder's bond made payable withv�t oorxliticaz to the City of �idley, Minneso�ta, in an ama.u�t of nat less than five (5�) per vent of the tatal amount of the bid. 'Eae City �auncil reseYVes the ric�t to reject ariy ar�d all bids arid to waive any inforn�alities in ariy bids received witi�out explanation. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days. By order of the City axu�cil of the City of FYidley, Minnesata. Dated this 26th day of Febn�aty, 1990. Published: F�idley Focus MaL�ch 7, 1990 M3m� 14, 1990 Mamh 21, 1990 Jotm G. Flora, P.E. P�LIC � DIItEC.Z�t �trvc.�t.i� Bulletin Mat�rh 9, 1990 M2�r+ch 16, 1990 Marrh 23, 1990 - ST. 1990-1 (OVERLAY) T °j�_ :;.�:� :R� � ...�_. , ,�..� .� 11 C -.:; ::.; ; - ��- ; nsr^wc�s s_ - asmc.�s 1' _'s''' "• ,;;;• -- •- -- �-• _ _ _ :�t;' � .�� g.c .. I �-- j 'r,~, -- '�; 's� " �"-�, ��-`-'-- - ,jL-��¢L �� - , � �r�=-_ � ' � \ _ � � � i.. i- rs:a I �'� j ' �.. � ' , � �` - '��! _ _ ..� ► � \ c...ti `J /'�� ,.' 1 , . � =�. ✓/ . �ti .. ..,.r�= -. � e �k r -- � M'""� � ,; HICKORY ST. �� .� _ ` _ _ ' t .�'� ; � �� ` '�v�, _ � '' - � , `-_ � -' _ i, _=�.�,�.�;r. � �;: � � � i _ �� <� 'f • -: ( ,� ' ,- �i i ��'. - �� '�� _^ � � �_s.. ,. -= E. �� -s _� . �� i ��_�- I • g i ..�l- 'ii - ` c/ , / � �1\ �' � � � �I�'r��--_--��.. �: � � Fi ' _ � ��.- � , � i ,.. ; , :. ` l _ �':� 1 � ,_l � � MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �T- PW90-63 FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Works Director,,��) DATE: February 14, 1990 SIIBJECT: Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 10 (Sealcoat) Attached is a resolution ordering improvement, approving the plans and authorizing the advertisement for bids for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 10 (Sealcoat). The engineering estimate for this proj ect F :��1:,� ��1�°�: ��Funds for this work are available within the��3`� S�ree� Capital Improvement Fund. Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution. JGF/MAW/ts Attach�ent 12 `i �- •. � • 12A it'BBOIDPI�T lD. - 1990 -�r_.� � . . -.. _.• . � � �• -. � �: •. • .� . • '.� :N' � � • :1'.i :1: I: • ' :IU : _ �'J:ti" 1 1' ' • • : 1:+ ' • • ' • � � ]� ± •�' l�ls, ti�e City Cb�uycil of the City of Fridley has established a policy of Sealooating the City streets an a regular basis, 1�8, the Public Works Direct.or has submitted a plan showir�g the streets in t�ead of sealooating, 1�1W, �, BE ZT R'F�oLVED, by the City Oo�mcil of the City of FYidley, Anoka C�amty, Minnesota, as follvws: 1. �at the straets reoa�merr3ed for sealooating by the Public Works Depar�rnnt be sealooated, and the work involved in said i�rov��t shall hereafter be de.signated as: BTRELT IIdPl�VII��T� Pt�►T�C.T 'U. �. 1990 - 10 2. �e plarLS ar�d specificatia�s prepared by the Public Works Departine.nt for � inQrovenent anci eac3i of ti�aa, pursuant to the C�incil actio�n heretofore, are herevy apprwed arxi shall be filed with the City C1erk. 3. �e wnrk to be performeci w�der 8TR'E�P Pl�JBCr 1�U. 8T. 1990 - 10 be petformed w'�der cne oontract. Zhe Public Works Direct-.or shall aocordir�gly prepare ard cause to be insert.ed in the official new�p�aper advertise�esit for bids upon the araking of such in�rove�nents under such approved plans ar�d specifications. Zhe advertise�nent shall be published for two (2) weeks (at least 10 days), ar�d shall s�ecify the work to be doa�e arid will state that bids will be ages�ed at 11:00 a.m. on 1lednesday, lrfarc� 28, 1990, in the CXxancil Q�ambezs of the City Hall, and that no bids will be ooc�idered imless sealed ar�d filed with the Public Works Dir+ector arid aooa�panied by a ca.sh de�osit, bid bo�rl, or oertified check payable to the City of PYidley for five perverit (5�) of the amauit of such bid. ZY�at the advertis�nent for bids for BTREEP IIdP�'1VH�l+� Pt�J►TBC.T I�D. 1990 - 10 shall be substantially star�dan3 in fona. PASB� AI�ID ADOPI'ID BY '!� CITY �@XTSL �+' T� CITY �R+' FRIDl�Y T�S 26Zii L�IY OF FE�RY, 1990. WII.i�AM J. NEE - 1�Y�2 A7't'ESr: �,��: �f . .►:: , . «M4 « �+:. 12B • M: • : �� :i'.: gRR�I' g�PApVEt�iTP pI�78C.'1' 1�. BT. 1990 - 10 (SRAT�T) Sealed bids will be reoeived arid publicly opei�ed by the C3.tY of F�idley, Anoka Gbunty, Minnesota, at the offioe of the Public Works Direc,ytor of the City of Fridley, 6431 University Avenue, N.E. , Fridley, M,iru�so�ta, 55432, (Te1.571-3450) oaz the 28t1� da�y of �, 1990, at 11:00 a.m. for the � of work ar�d materials for the follawirig w�rk for the City of FYidley eT� p�J►THGT I�U. ST. 1990 - 10 (SSAI�iT) . The surfaoe txeatrnent project oonsi.sts of sealooatirig abazt 235, 022 square yards of streets in different parts of the City of FYidley an,i oonsists of the follvwing principal it� of w�rk and appmx? �+►'?te quantities s 235,022 Square Yards Sealooat wit11 FA-3 Aggregate 235,022 Square Yards S'�aeep after Sealooat Application All in a000r�3anoe with plans ar�d s��ecifications pr�ar�d by Jahn G. Flora, P.E., Public Wbrks Direc.-tor, FYidley City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E., FYidley, NIId, 55432 (Tel. 571-3450). Plans ar�d specifications may be examined at the offiae of the Public Works Direc,�tor at�d vapies may be obtained for th�e Oontractor's indi.vidual use by applying to the Public Works Direc.�tor. Bids n�ust be m�de oa� the basis of cash payment for work, ar�d a000�ariied by a cash deposit, vextifie�d c�eck (oaz a responsible bank in the State of Minnesota) or a bidder's borid made payable withaut voa�diti� t+o the City of FYidley, Nlinne�t,a, in an amauit of not less than fi�e pe.iroe.rit (5�) of the tatal amo�ult of the bid. Zhe City �il reserves the right to reject ariy ar�d all bids ar�d to waive any infarn�alities in any bids z�aceived withaut e�lanation. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of thiity (30) days. By order of the City C�onuicil of the City of Fridley, Minnesota- Dated this 26th day of Febivary, 1990. Published: Fridlev Focus Marc� 7, 1990 March 14, 1990 Maz�h 21, 1990 Jdzn G. Flora, P.E. PUSI�C W� DIRECIbR Qonstructioa� Bulletin r33rc�z 9, 1990 March 16, 1990 March 23, 1990 t990 SEALCOAT_PROJECT FA-3 , � .... ... .-- ` � 2C ' �- �.;=V—.�.., • � ertv a veio�er -v� ^'. �� ' : .-l��'' ��; ��i � _ . ••.•• m•••. �w•• VOT11Ni SCIOOL ;�: :.�:`t: .ifi � .._ j o�srrocTS _ ostRCTs � ��::�'� :>+.;,i � r`�'�, _.., -il ' `` � � 'V�. _ �. +� `� AS Fk',..� - - I �'! - • - �,^� � � .. ;, 1 � � �- _ \ �� -"' �i, 'f i . e — _ - � _ _ •r�� ■ � � '� � .. �... �0 • � � �� _ — - � � [/ � ., ....: -, ' c . � '. .. ." ��wc � 1�. //�� _ ' 1 1 q�� s ��afi� . > � � ' ; �� z,.�-�'—' E'-�'=��-�_=-�—�,� --�,_ d,��d� �-� t 1r ��[_.�� __ ��'� e` - � � � �;�� ! I � � ��'� � e i ,I' i �! �� ` _ � . �� , � c �� ,_�. i� � i � I t � � � N � '1 i a ( ,./ � / � �� - � " a �.6 '__ � .�� . A - � Y . I� . i� . _� j �_ � _. /i? I � i l I �L� s i � --i _�-. > W—,�^ �e �� '� � � - -_ I __�i��-' - � � ' `�� '' -- -- 'I � T�! ._ _. F - , s ��.,} h� �� z' - �` y ,, o ��. :'r'�'ti:1 • �-r-�. �i�.��. I �� '�, y� �-,- ti�� - � � , � . • ��, > � , _$ _ r �= � . � s � =� t �. ��=`'-��y�� te � ..r�.�.. • � �,��i�{�._��,� ;, �_�, �� ^if�=. ,'. .�.��'�� ' � � - vi .� r-� —�._. v� /�., /E � �� A � ` � F= . E � z •,�` {�--� --� I^��/�;�`,�� !.,� 1 � .; �... �� .. � �� j ��y✓,�� p .� ,��_ � / _•�-_ t.L �� F ,, 1 ! �I I� l� ` ; °'^"�' ' �,. � — — �I, .l� � = ��_� ��- Y - � � ��L.�`.!i I_�' L' i _I i '�,I � s ; —_ - -- I �-°r .�3 -� � � � .. _\��V I� i� ` ( _.. '' i� ' f _ J l�� o- � � � �� i � � 'e P � �— � � iY �� 1 � ��—�-- I'-'=�i—� i� �., � ...v, �.i F � ��f��r ;.�� = I � "�V r` -- A �C�I � � - �- - � - -- �- ��i i ��' �-��; !� li �.� ._i{: �� y fr +� > �V �� ' � • - _ -� > � ��—� �.,�6�C;� _,. � � �i�� i -f ��K� Si. �1� 'k' �'�.J -- �T �� - � • roo�[ ..�� ` � �� - — W' �� ) j i � �� _: S IT �� if'�i ' 1lL�FL �� k 1.�-� �//�`��! ` ��a�� ' -ti. '+� ��1�� Y ti":.z � � --- i � �r �Y�ti� ' � �� '�, � �� c. ��, _ _ � � — . � ' �� '�� ---� _ . .;r i � "� ( � - _- � � , f,� � � / '�_ � �� = ;�:- ' �I � �� ='- i ��r i�, � - -� ��I �: �� ,� ,� _ ry _ ,� , • � ,y < <. ' / )r� (��'I`� � � �.�. ,� � r--"� ,.—t�. � � �j �� 1, � �--r i . �) _ ` � I ^ �(� ��P,��'�.�j�E � �� '!�� _ .._ _ � . . . `" j � . } —�� _ �: y i� � � 3 �{ �' t ',F-�� ;' �.: _ _.- ., _ . ___ ...�.�,. _.... _ � I ��„�� __ i I .�.�Y _ C� .�. .. � � � 3 „ L � ,' P � ,4 \ I �'�F2�LL.� SS = �.:: .. y�. _�. Z` .�. I'. ' C.r S�. :� - t ,� z� ; �: . ___ _ �. _ __= � __ _ , ��a� .��1�. _ .� - �_. :_. _ �__ , $ ��,:; — � - �1�,�� _ ==s. - _ _ _ - __-: - == _ —_�,— " �, � r _ - �' _ �. _ — - - - _`'.:' .. �- , s � .�� ! � _ �' - _:.. - �':'� _ e,= -= �z \ >s `\ .. - �'_ �� '_�•.�� 11:• � .�.�. .��. I _w `� . R� �.. « „ti. aes� p � � � i _.. r �= - . �_._,• �__ K P �.�� ,, _' =z" . _ �: _~; __.—� K � � 9, � __ ==' - _``- _- _ `__' � ��_ � � �t��('f t � ° - � � L . A � 1 -�_ �2 L�7• �= L ' /� � fiL �F� �� : .. �.. .. � . •�-• . �� .�� Z�� j - ".II L,_ =T: ' . _': _ _� = r '� , r-- _ ..� n_: „ .��:. � �� '!� '- - STREET MAP-CITY OF $_� � i =� = FRIDLEY °�� ` - �.., � .. � a.'�..�.�._�. -- ---_ _....:� —,� , --�'- ---.�---� � �— � 4 6 � 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SIIBJECT: E�,��,��„�� s�W�� w,rc� P.irkS Sirttl�, nn„��v,,�,�,�,�� MEMORANDUM �' William W. Burns, City Manager� � PW90-61 John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Works Director �/�ii February 14, 1990 Resolution for Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project - 1990 Attached is the resolution ordering improvement, approval of plans and advertisement of bids for Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project - 1990. This resolution is being provided for execution by the City as mandated by State laws. This project covers the remedial sidewalk and curb and repair and replacement in the City whether due to utility repairs or to driveway entrance permits. Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution. JGF/MAW/ts Attachment /1 U� " �� qU , /�d" �l ' n �'V / / " �� / � r 13w .� v l.. r c� ._,-- �- ., . . �o�r,Qrro�r �u. - t990 13A •�s_. � . v:,.r�.:av� . � .�•� :r.- i:,� -.;- : �. _ •�:- . � I� 'J:+{' � M;r I:N •I' �:�M:i 1=•�h: •• MY; rll'1: f'1 :il' �� : ��':r"�. • � �8� � OO�S�1011 Of OBY'�d71'1 lIIpYY7V�30Bi1tS 1S �.e�al�ai tA b2 ]ll t�'12 interest of the City of Fridley and tl�e praperty awriers affect�ad t1�ex�e,vy. �W, �, BE I'P It�'80LVED by tiilee City Cau�cil of the City of Fridley, Anoka �ty, Minnesota as follaas: 1. Zhat the following improvesoerits prq�osed by Cbtuicil I�esolutio�.s are iyexnl7y ordex�ed to be effected ar�d c�oa�leted as required: Resaova]. ar�d replaoament of misvellat�eous ooa�rete cu�, guttex arxi sidewalk. 2. Zhe plans ar�d s�ecificatiorLS pr��ed by the Public Works Direct.or for ax�� inProve�ents are hereby approved arid shall be filed with tl�e City Clerk. The Public Works Direct�or shall a000rdir�gly prepare arid cause to be inserted in the official newspaper acivertise�nts for bids upon the making of suc3� iu�rove�e.nts under such approved plans ar�d s�ecifications. Zhe hall be published for three (3) weeks (at least 21 days) , arid shall s�ecify the work to be done ar�d will state that the bids will be apes�d ar�d vo��sidered at 11:00 a.m. c� We�ay, tbe 21st day of Mat�ch, 1990, ar�d that no bids will be oonsidered unless sealed ar�d filed with the Public Works Direct.or. 7�at the advertisemetit for bids for i�L At�ID REP'L�TP 0�' C�1R8� (�TlR'ER AUID B��I1C - 1990 shall be substantlally in the starydard form. PASSID AND ADOFI�D BY � CITY aQI�iCQ, OF � CITI'Y OF FRIDIEY �IIS 26ZH DAY OF F�7ARY, 1990. WIIZSAM J. NEE - I�Y�2 : MF� �ur Fv A. HI�APALA - CITY CLII2K . . .: . : ,. . � �._ '�: • ` � '/:i• � �+`s I:n •I- / :�M:i 13� 1�_ •• �.'1: ' �11'1: f � :rl' ► / � :,;' �: _ � Sealed bids will be Yeoeived and publicly aper�ed by the City of Fridley, Anaka Ua�mty, Miru�esata, at the offioe of th�e Public Works Directflr, 6431 University Avern�e N.E., Fridley, Minnesata, 55432 (Tel. 571-3450) ari ti�e 21st day of March, 1990, at 11:00 a.m. , for the �?rn�=sling of wurk and materials for 1�L llt+ID �'tl` �+' O�TS CIAffi, QTl'I'ER, !l1�D SI�QIIiC. 2, 000 Lin. Ft. Misoellar�eaLS Ooa�crete 0.irb & C�tter Renaval & Replao�e�nt 2, 000 Sq. F`t. oor�stnxrt 5 ft. wide x 4 incii sidewalk 100 Lin. Ft. OoncYete Valley (�tter All in a000rdarioe with plans arid s�ecificatioa�.s prepared by John G. Flora, P.E. , Public Works Dir+ec.�tor, FYidley City Hall, 6431 University Avei�ue N.E., Fridley, I�T, 55432 (Ztel. 571-3450) . Plans ar�d s�ecifications may be examined at the offioe of the Public Works Director ar�d c�opies may be abtairied for the Dontractor's ir�dividual use by applyir�g to the Public Works Direct,or. Bids must be made art the basis of cash payment for wr�rk, ar�d aoocmpanied by a cash deposit, oertified c3zeck (ori a r�sp�sible bank in the State of MinneSata) or a bidder' s boix'! made payable withaut �itioa�► to the City of FYidley, 1�1, in an ama�t of r�t less than five (5�) per oent of the tatal amourrt of the bid. Zhe City Cau�cil rese,rves the right to rej ect ariy and all bids and to waive ariy infornalities in any bids rec�eived witiiout e�lanatioci. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days. By o�ier of the City �il of the City of FYidley, M[in�sat�. Dated the 26th day of FebnsaYy, 1990. Publisl�eci: Fridley Focu.s Feblvary 28, 1990 Mal'�Ch 7, 1990 March 14, 1990 Jo�Yu1 G. Flora, P.E. PCTBLSC WbRKS DIRDCI�2 Constructiaaz Bulletin Mamh 2, 1990 Marrh 19, 1990 Mal�il 16, 1989 13B MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager � PW90-65 FROM: John G. F1ora,��Public Works Director Bob Nordahl, Operations Analyst DATE: February 15, 1990 BIIBJECT: Advertisement for Bids for Phase II of the 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 200 AEC Engineers, the citv ��.,�„�*��* .,�� .....___�_� During 1989, phase I for the repair reservoir exterior was completed. of the 3 MG concrete ground Based upon the proposed 5-Year Capital Improvement Program, we scheduled the repair of the interior, Phase II, of this tank for 1990. We are bidding the project in the spring but work will not take place until later fall. This will help insure proper water storage is available this summer and allow for lower bid prices. Recommend the City Council authorize the advertisement of bids for Phase II of the 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 2 0. JGF/BN/ts Attachment Q �% V ` ��l � �� 14 r �. . . RBBOLIITIOId �TO. - 19 9 0 itE80LIITION ORD$RING Z![PROVEI�IBNT 71ND 71DV8RTI88MENT 1rOR BIDS !OR TSB REPl1ZR ]1ND �I1dT$NANCB OF PH1�i8E II OF '1'H$ 3 1�[G CONCRETE REBERVOIR RBPl1IR PROJECT �TO. Z00 WHEREAS, the construction of certain improvements is deemed to be in the interest of the City of Fridley and the property owners affected thereby. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley as follows: 1. That the following improvements proposed by Council Resolutions are hereby ordered to be affected and completed as required: pHABE II OF THE 3 1dG CONCRETE RESERVOIR REPAIR PROJECT NO. 200 2. The plans and specifications under the direction of the Public Works Director for such improvements are hereby approved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. The Public Works Director shall accordingly prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper advertisements for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three (3) weeks (at least 21 days), and shall specify the work to be done and will state that the bids will be opened and cansidered at 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, the 22nd day of March, 1990, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Public Works Director. That the advertisement for bids for Phase II of the 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Project No. 200 shall be substantially in the standard form. PA88ED �ATD ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF T8E CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRIIARY, 1990. ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR 14A 14B NOTICB TO BIDD$RS PH�SB II OF TH8 3 M6 CONCRETE RES$RVOIR REPAIR PROJECT NO. 200 Sealed bids will be received and publicly opened by the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Mfnnesota, at the office of the Public Works Director, 6431 University Ave., N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432 (Tel. 571-3450) on Tbursday, the 22nd day ot March, 1990, at 11:00 a.m., for the furnishing of work and materials for PHASE II OF THE 3 MG CONCRETE RESERVOIR REPAIR PROJECT NO. 200. Each bid shall be submitted on the printed proposal which is attached to the specifications which are on file in the office of AEC - ENGINEERS & DESIGNERS, 511 lith Avenue, South Minneapolis, Minnesata, 55415, and may be obtained with a$45.00 payment. All bids must be sealed and marked as indicated in paragraph B-1 and addressed to the Public Works Director, Fridley Municipal center, 6431 University Ave., N.E., Fridley, MN, 55432. Bids must be made on the basis of cash payment for work, and accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check (on a responsible bank in the State of Minnesota) or a bidder's bond made payable without condition to the City of Fridley, Minnesota, in an amount of not less than five percent (5�) of the total amount of the bid. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids and to waive any informalities in any bids received without explanation. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days. By order of the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota. Dated this 26th day of February, 1990. John G. Flora, P.E. Public Works Director Published: FRIDLEY FOCUS CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN February 28, 1990 March 2, 1990 March 7, 1990 March 9, 1990 March 14, 1990 March 16, 1990 �� /,l'l�iJl`�Irl�ii� .��' �� ! +�� Tiii ,,�� ,-, f�„�'� - r;� � ��,��i;�i� � � �, _ . � � � '',. �� ♦ � .i �`��..�'r �r .�_ era SUPF 3VgTEM ��7 RATI�V F �EOSCnin10 F►T lFiMA11Y D� �7 �CATEC gs� llVOfiTM-� �F FqIG 15 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDIIM 90-2-5 WILLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGER (�'V ROBERT D. ALDRICH, FIRE CHIEF FEBRUARY 23, 1990 ADVERTISEMENT TO REQIIEST BIDS FOR A NEW FIRE TRUCK Funds were allocated in the Capital Improvement Projects Fund for 1990 to acquire a new fire pumper. The proposed unit will replace a 1964 pumper that cannot be refurbished or brought into compliance with current OSHA requirements. These requirements do not permit firefighters to ride on the outside of the apparatus. Purchase of the unit at this time is in keeping with the department's equipment planning that provides a reasonable time span between purchase of major pieces of apparatus. ��`�� t3tr�� 'fio n+��. pieCes af appara�u� wi�.l. �►�r ��I�i ,, �• � °��'t�^�r�rs : � : I have enclosed a copy of the specifications for your consideration. I recommend that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the advertisement for bids as indicated in the attached information. RDA/ s s Enclosure R880LIITION NO. - 1990 RESOLIITION TO 7►DVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR ONE (1) 1250 GPM PIIMPER/AERIAL TOWER BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley as follows: 1. That it is in the interest of the City to award a bid contract for the following item: ONE (1) 2250 GPM PUMPER/AERIAL T4WER 2. A copy of the specifications �or the above-described items and materials, together with a proposal for the method of purchase and the payment thereof have been presented to the Council by the City Manager and the same are hereby approved and adopted as the plans and specifications, and the method of acquisition and payment to be required by the City with respect to the acquisition of said items and materials. 3. The purchase of said items and materials as described above shall be effected by sealed bids to be received and opened by the City of Fridley on the 30TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990. The City Manager is directed and authorized to advertise for the purchase of said items and materials by sealed bid proposals under notice as provided by law and the Charter of the City of Fridley, the notice to be substantially in form as that shown by Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of by reference. Said notice shall be published at least twice in the official newspaper of the City of Fridley. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF � 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 15A ADVERTIS$MENT FOR BIDS MOTOR FIRE APPARATII8 BPEC. FD 90-1 BIDS CLOSE: 12:00 NOON, MARCH 3, 1990 CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA NOTICE TO BIDDERS Sealed proposals will be received until 12:00 noon on March 30, 1990 by the City Manager, City of �'ridley, Minnesota, in behalf of the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota for the following: MOTOR FIRE APPARATUS - 1250 GPM PIIMPER/AERIAL WATER TOWER All equipment must meet the minimum specifications as set f orth . Specifications and proposal forins may be obtained from the City Manager's Office. All bids must be on the proposal form furnished by the City Manager. All bids must be accompanied by a certified check or bidder's bond in the amount of 5% of the total amount bid. The City reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive all formalities. Bids should be addressed to the City Manager, Fridley, Minnesota and be clearly marked "Bids for Motor Fire Apparatus". WILLIAM W. BURNS CITY MANAGER Publish: 15B � � c�nroF fRlDLEY DATE: C011JiMUNITY DE�VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT' MEMORANDUM February 20, 2990 TO: William Burns, City Manager � Jim Hill, Acting City Manager � FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Barbara Dacy, �lanning Coordinator Lisa Campbel�lanning Associate SIIBJECT: Year End Adjustment/Grant #8025 Director The 1989 grant from Anoka County for Solid Waste abatement totaled $29 483.86. The total expenses charc�ed to this rant were 4 � �'�`: �°�, � ��1i� .�� c�#ei�]�C�t is , $.2�", ��`�, � �►�1�;; �Exactly q �' �I I'�, I� '� � ; �, fi1�S de� ��"t'`'�.S �C�otYti't��' ft�r l�v r_nri�`i°� _t,�al an 16 $ 57,304.86 - 29.483.27 $ 27,821.59 $ 27,821.59 - 14,107.26 $ 13,714.33 Action Rec�uested Total Expenses 1989 Anoka Grant Fund Deficit Fund Deficit Yard Waste Transfer Curbside Recycling The Auditors will be in to review the 1989 financial year in early March. The Finance Department requests that all year-end adjustments be completed by the end of February. Staff requests authorizat�Q,p, �o.��q� �,� �u d deficit of $27,821.59 to the ��i�`3�"�:�+�„ �,e�,7�� .�� 3tt�.�t:r� LC:ls M-90-61 7 19 _ CIlY OF FRIDLEY FOR CONCIIRRENCE SY THE CITY COIINCIL JMG Contracting 5141 Abbott Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55410 FEHRIIARY 26, 1990 EBTIMATEB Phase I- 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 (Contractor) AMENDED FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,000.00 AEC Engineers & Designers 511 - llth Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 Phase I- 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 (Inspection Services) Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ HNTB 6700 France Avenue South Suite 260 Minneapolis, MN 55435 55.00 Design of 1.5 MG Elevated Reservoir At Locke Park Project No. 196 Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15,600.00 Twin City Testing 662 Cromwell Avenue St. Paul, MN 55114 Soil Borings for the 1.5 MG Elevated Reservoir at Locke Park Project No. 196 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4, 684.23 E„�,��,��,��,�� st�W<,� w:�� .,�k•, s<<��; nn.��,<<��,.��,cc MEMORANDUM TO: Rick Pribyl, Finance Director PW90-70 FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director DATE: February 20, 1990 SIIBJECT: Amendment of Final Estimate No. 2 to JMG Contracting Inc. The final estimate to JMG Contracting Inc. was incorrect. AEC Engineering reported that JMG Contracting received $112,400.00 on Estimate No. 1. The estimate was approved for $111,400.00 at the council meeting of October 23, 1989. The final estimate was approved and paid for $6,500.00 on February 12, 1990. This amount should of been paid for $7,500.00. This amended estimate for $1,000.00 will correctly complete the contract to JMG Contracting Inc. for a total contract price of $118,900.00. JGFjkn 19A --- il_ • �. � CITY OF FRIDLEY � ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. _ FRIDLEY, MN. 55432 Date: February 26, 1990 To: HONORABLE MAYOR and CITY COUNCIL RE: AMENDED FINAL ESTIMATE CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, N.E. PERIOD ENDING: February 26, 1990 FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 FOR: JMG Contracting, Inc. 4253 - 10th Avenue, South Minneapolis, MN 55407 PHASE I- 3 MG CONCRETE RESERVOIR REPAIR PROJECT NO. 192 (53rd 8 Johnson) STATEMENT OF WORK ESTIMATED UNIT :- ' QUANTITY = AMOUNT CONTRACT 1TEM QUANTITIES PRICE ; THIS EST: TO DATE AMENDED FINAL ESTIMATE $1,000.00 $1,000.00 TOTAL $1,000.00 SUMMARY: Original Contract Amount Revised Contract Amount Vatue Gompleted To Date Amount Retained (10�/0) (5%) Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE $118,900.00 0 0 117,900.00 117,900.00 $1,000.00 ��- CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR I hereby certity that the work performed and the materiais supplied to date under terms of the contract for the reference project, and atl authorized changes thereto, have an actual value under the contract of the amounts shown on this estimate (and the final quantities of the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and correct and no part of the "Amount Due This Estimate" has been received. By Contractor's Authorized Representative (Title) CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER I hereby certify that i have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment of this estimate under the contract for reference project. CITY OF FRIDIEY, INSPECTOR By hecked By: , 1 � � J �`� • � �� `'. R-'� �C �� ; Respectfut)y Subm;tted, City of Fridley Date Date � j �� By �� , f'C-<i-- �' John G. Flora, P.E. � Director of Public Works 19C