06/18/1990 - 4972FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1�IEETING
� ATTENDENCE SHEET
MONDAY , June 1 �, , J990
7:30 P.M.
LEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
ITEM
RINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER
� a � U 1� c� - � U
- e S
� � � � � (,�
(..1. l r. �' � i0� /V. �. l` L� zd Q��
r
`� � k a� 3�—��� v�� �' ���-� 2� �9o_d
���K �%, ANi f3a --6 �,�� SZe �v 90-0 1-��1 ��/c
� ��� /-/ �tr�� � �. ,, � �,
z., -
F��� � ��'. u � �� S-� %��� D- z
� ,
� �:
� �-S -� 7 � � ,2?.�' _ cl�� -oZ
� � ,
�
� �� u� �1
�� ,
�,��1 �j� a�rn� �60� 3z� r�� � ss I- 1�
�' ,<, Cs� �fYY/'VV1Ct li! ��dl��/�i'
-: :�; : �
. T . � s o.r> � / /��c� C°2��K ��2 �i2 t D 90 -d -Y
� _ F� a ' �v � � � /mLf o - oy
�
- '�'s �� ' - % �� . /� .�i.0!_.� d ' d ?�
� ,N�3 �t�o�so� �-� �i cQ`7 � �v� n/�. ��,�- `�o- o�,
� � p
�0�- �`.��t � ��� -1J-
� �c� — � �i�•h /- _
a � o �� �� �- , qo- a�
uS - S 3�o - '� v� ,vF � o-0 2
� / �f�d� � " � % �U � -�r�� /= if�. F 6l�J - .a -
_ �
� � _ � � '% (�-� � ,(l� �'.� .
1
�, � - � _ „ , �. , �� � - / Z Yl � � D� . -
\
�o-�. �>e�le��.�
�
`�d.y� �,�, �,e�t
l�e�r-� /�'��°�S S �t P►�
; e �����so%�
i' �/
�'Yt� N��Gl1�SfJ1�
�oxan r� }{e r
����, �'..�-,
�w,., 7�-�� y,��,�Z
.� �� ��- 7�"��� P r
C����'/LS cdV
�� �-��.. �e. i� .L_.
►�
c�
�� 3 �is s , Sf /���—
3 �S �'l;ss s�` �F
3�5 M�ssiss�ppa S�
� `C'�
��
�� �a- oz
z 0� �d -� O Z.
�D� �0-�
I �a5-1 �9`'� �ve n u� N �� . �. n �oru,m
53�� /'/�vrg ��.c�:�. �/�/aK9 �4,��
Cem. G✓'a/'��B���G�qnn/c 33�f�� #
(3 0 9-r� O--r �'�; t `
�m �Nv��T�
�� � � � -z-
� �'
N1��-� �_� � `��.� Li� v'�..�
�oU�Eri c_kSOt2
�7 � - � G'`��,� e ��. .
�� ,�
i�
���o ���
�} �� � �� ��t
$ll W �GTy-��
s�o,cv�e�
.�l U ! �°�//I�✓�L//���e/►;�
CJa� �iS l�/� S��f.�,/
��. � Lp �o� �• ��-
�--�d��,
,
�,�;�I� Fo�s
Z. v �4 � D_ c� ``�
/i /� l/ `
��� `�`G ��'�.
�. .
�o� 90-0�
��
. �.�
�- ��- �o - a � �: :� .;
��. �� _a� ;
�
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, JIINE 18, 1990 Paqe 2
PIIBLIC HSARING:
Continuation of Public Hearing
for a Rezoning Request,
ZOA #90-02, by Fridley Town
Square Associates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1J
4
�"
�
V_ /
OLD BIISINESS: �
Second Reading of an Ordinance �
Under Section 12.06 of the City
Charter Declaring Certain Real �'�(
Estate to be Surplus and
Authorizing the Sale Thereof . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2C
� _
r(� 'J��
�
Second Reading of an Ordinance
Under Section 12.07 of the City ��
Charter to Vacate Streets and
Alleys and to Amend Appendix C
of the City Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3A
��
r� '
� �
`
NEW BIISINESS:
First Reading of an Ordinance ��D
Approving a Rezoning, ZOA #90-02, �
by Fridley Town Square Associates . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4C
�
a✓ \ /'� �
1
� �
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, JIINE 18, 1990 Paqe 3
NEW BIISZNESB (CONTINIIED)i
Resolution Providing for Water �
Rate Chanqe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5B
6' /
��
�
Receive the Minutes of the Planning
Commission Meeting of May 30, 1990 . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6NN
A. Resolution Approving a
Subdivision, Lot Split, ��,
L.S. #90-02, to Split
Lot 2, Block N, Riverview
Heights, in Order to Create
Two Buildable Parcels ........... 6F - 6I
........... 6N - 6AA
J`
�� �
✓
Y`�
B. Establish Public Hearing
to Amend Section
205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light I 1
Industrial Zoning District), (;
and Section 205.18.U3.0 �° ��h �
(the M-2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning District) of the
Fridley Zoning Ordiriance ........ 6I - 6J
........ 6BB - 6FF
C. Establish Public Hearing to
Amend Sections of the Fridley �
Zoning Ordinance to Permit I� �
Nine Foot Wide Parking Stalls � G�i
in Certain Districts, and to I�
Require Parking Spaces to �
be Double-Striped ............... 6J - 6M
............... 6GG - 6NN
FRIDI,EY CITY COIINCIL MSBTIN6� JIINE 18, 1990
Paqe 4
�T$11 BUSINE88 (CONTINIIED) :
Approval of Appraisal and Relocation
Consultant Contract for Iverson
Property in the Riverview Heights
Acquisition Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7J
�
� /¢^ /�'• �x
`�S�/ ' A
w v�
�
Approval of Joint Powers Agreement
with Anoka County for the Acquisition
of Optical Scan Vote Tabulation
Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8H
_ ��^ ��
_ ' �;
�/ �� �,;
� `%� 1
�,U
.�
����+
���
� �
� ��j ,
/
Approval of Change Order No. 2 for °�,
Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206 . A....... 9- 9B
�--.�
Resolution Approving Plat, P.S. #90-02,
Michael Servetus 2nd Addition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - lOD
T
� /U
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING, JIINE 18, 1990
Paqe 5
NEW BIISINEBS (CONTINIIED):
Resolution Ordering Preliminary Plans, 2�„/�
Specifications and Estimates of the ��''"
Costs Thereof: Street Improvement
Project No. ST. 1990 - 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11C
i
a
��
� �
Resolution Receivinq the Preliminary
Report and Receiving Petitions to
Waive the Public Hearing on the
Matter of the Construction of Certain /}�
Improvements: Street Improvement ��V
Project Nol. ST. 1990 - 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12A
�
C V�
� �,
Resolution Ordering Improvement and
Final Plans and Specifications and
Estimates of Costs Thereof: Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 3
1
,�
,. � �
�� V
. . ".� . . . . . . 13
Resolution Ordering Improvement and
Approval of Plans and Ordering
Advertisement for Bids: Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 3 . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14A
,�e
,' V
FRIDLSY CITY COtJNCIL MEETZNG, JUNE 18, 1990 Paqe 6
NEW BUSINE88 (CONTINUBD):
Resolution Orderinq Preliminary
Plans, Specifications and Estimates .
of the Costs Thereof: Water, Sanitary L
Sewer & Storm Sewer Project No. 210 . . . � . . . . . . 15 - 15B
a,
e�^'
B�
Resolution Receiving the Preliminary
Report and Receiving Petitions and
Waiving the Public Hearing on the
Matter of the Construction of Certain ��
Improvements: Water, Sanitary Sewer
& Storm Sewer Project No. 210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16A
�
,�
c��
J U
Resolution Ordering Improvement and
Final Plans and Specifications and
Estimates of Costs Thereof: Water,
Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer •q .
Proj ect No . 210 . . . . . . . . . . . _ C� . . . . . . . 17
1
� �,
� � ��
Resolution Ordering Improvement,
Approval of Plans and Ordering
Advertisement for Bids: Water, � -
Sanitary Sewer & Storm Sewer �
Proj ect No . 210 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 18A
\ I/ / .
�
U
FRiDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING, JIINE 18, 1990 pags �
NEA BUSINESS iCONTINIIED):
�
Appointments: City Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21D
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
ADJOIIRN:
,Fisu av�aia�7vTap�+v vF THp ��rnT aQ I�iTFTTN[` AF THR FR2DLEY CITY COIINCIL OF
JIINE 4. 1990
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:3? p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and-audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL'
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Billings, Councilman
Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and
Councilwoman Jorgenson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
GOUNCIL MEETING. MAY 21. 1990:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Mayor Nee requested the following item be added: (3.1)
Consideration of Commission Appointments.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above
addition. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM. VISITORS:
MARY VASECKA - LOCKE LAKE ASSOCIATION:
Ms. Vasecka, 6909 Hickory Drive, extended thanks to John Flora for
his efforts and communication regarding the Locke Lake problems.
She stated that she understands soil borings will take place in the
next few weeks. She questioned if any other progress has been made
that the residents should be aware of.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that work is continuing
with the City Attorney to draft a petition to present to the Rice
Creek Watershed District. He stated that there is a Chapter 112,
a watershed 509 Plan, and a new 601 Plan that affect the storm
water improvement projects. He stated, hopefully, there would be
additional information to present to the Council by the June 18
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE �. 1990 PAGE 2
meeting. He stated that he would continue to keep the residents
informed, as Locke Lake is one of the City's high priority
projects.
Mr. Flora stated that as plans are developed the sedimentation
issue will be addressed and a-determination made �if it is
marketable. He stated that in regard to the detention pond, it is
hoped that the City can work with the District Engineers to
incorporate it into their plans.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that he has done some research
on the problem and it must be recognized that the project can be
completed if there are enough funds to pay for it. He stated that
he is trying to figure out how this can be accomplished in the most
efficient way and what the administrative and legal complexities
involve. He stated that there are some procedures in Chapter 112
involving special assessments and appraisals of damages, but this
is very slow and very expensive.
Mr. Herrick stated that he is attempting to determine sources of
funding in addition to the money the homeowners and the City will
pay. He stated that this involves other governmental agencies
which, in itself, are slow and sometimes complex. He stated that
Chapters 112 and 473 include the original 509 Plan which has been
modified by the 601 Plan, and in addition, there is reference to
Chapters 106 and 429. He stated that to determine how these
provisions interrelate is complex. He stated that more time was
needed to research this material and to contact the attorney for
the Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated that, hopefully, he
would have a written report for the Council at their next meeting.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, felt this process would move very slowly
as the City is not in control of all the variables. He stated that
there are a lot of agencies involved and that some funds have been
set aside for at least the initial phase of the project.
Ms. Vasecka stated that she realizes it is a slow process, but the
Locke Lake Association just wants to make sure the improvements are
completed this time.
CONNIE METCALF - WEED PROBLEM AT MOORE LAKE:
Ms. Metcalf, 860 West Moore Lake Drive, stated the residents living
on Moore Lake are concerned about the weed problem. She submitted
a sample of the weed she had removed from the lake and stated the
entire lake is full of it. She stated these weeds are visible from
Highway 65 and produce a green scum. Ms. Metcalf stated she felt
that this detracts from the Zake and Fridley's image, as Highway
65 is heavily traveled. She asked that the City consider steps to
correct this problem. She stated that other residents living on
the lake are also concerned and that she would be willing to have
$RIDLSY CITY COIINCIL MESTINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 3
a meeting regarding the problem. She stated that there is alsa
another weed with a purple flower that is spreading alonq the east
side of the island.
Councilman Schneider asked that Btaff identify the weed and submit
a report on the west basin of Moore Lake. -
SCOTT LUND - '49ER DAY�:_
Mr. Scott Lund thanked all the Fridley organizations involved in
the '49er Day Celebration on June 13 - 17, 1990. He invited the
Council and all the residents to participate in the activities
during this celebration.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. REZONING ZOA #90-02 BY FRIDLEY TOWN SOUP.RE ASSOCIATES. TO
REZONE THREE SEPARATE PARCELS AS FOLLOWS:
�,OT 9 BLOCK 2 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1 FROM R-1. SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING TO S-2 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THE SAME
BEING 355 MISSISS�PPI STREET N.E AND.
LOT 12 BLOCK 3 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLP,T 2 FROM R-1. SINGLE
,�'AMILY DWELLING TO S-2 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT THE SAME BEING
368 - 66TH AVENUE N.E. AND,
LOTS 10 11 AND 12 BLOCK 2 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1, EXCEPT
'r'HE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF �1CCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT
�HEREOF ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA AND I,OTS 13 14 15 AND 16.
$LOCK 3 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2. ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED
PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND O RECORD IN THE OF CE O OUNT
RECORDER ANO COUNTY INNESOTA ROM R-1 SIN LE FAMILY
DWELLING AND C-1 LOCAL BUSINESS TO S-2, REDEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT THE SAME BEING 6525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearinq. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote� all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
opened at 7:58 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this rezoning is
requested to allow development at the northeast corner of Highway
47 (University Avenue) and Mississippi Street. She stated the
developers have completed a similar development in the City of
Minneapolis known as Calhoun Village. She stated that there are
two petitions that were received by the Planning Commission and a
third petition from various business owners in the vicinity of this
intersection. She stated that the developer held two neighborhood
meetings.
FRIDLEY CITY COtJNCIL MEETING OF JQNE 4. 1990 PAGE 4
Ms. Dacy stated that the properties to be rezoned include the
10,000 Auto Parts site as well as single family homes. She stated
that the zoning proposed is S-2 which is comparable with a PUD
District where the City approves or disapproves the rezoning based
on a particular plan or proposal.
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated that the
Center City Plan was adopted in 1979 by the HRA and City Council.
He stated that this plan included the Holly Center, the Target
Northern Operations Building, the Fridley Plaza Office Building and
Clinic, and the parking ramp. He stated that the 10,000 Auto Parts
site has been a part of this plan and called for a commercial
development or mixed uses.
Mr. Robertson stated that when the HRA first considered the
project, 10,000 Auto Parts was still a viable company. He stated
that with their demise, it was feasible to return to the original
concept of financing on a pay-as-you-go basis. He stated the
developer would need an extra $100,000 for the carrying costs for
the pay off of that grant; therefore, the grant would be in the
neighborhood of $300,000 for five years or up to $315,000 for six
years, depending on the interest rate of the loan at the time of
closing.
Mr. Robertson stated that the HRA considered this request at their
April 18, 1990 meeting and gave conceptual approval to the
financing and site plan subject to the neighborhood compatibility
and traffic conditions. He stated that the present commercial
building, the four vacant residential lots to the north, and the
two developed residential lots to the east generate approximately
$17,000 to $18,000 in taxes. He stated that with this proposed
development, a minimum of about $84, 000 would be paid in taxes.
That amounts to a substantial increase in tax revenue to the City
and will be available to the school district and the county when
the tax increment district is de-certified.
Ms. Dacy presented the site plan and stated that the proposal is
for a 28, 000 square foot retail facility, one story in height, with
a masonry rock face exterior. She stated that not aIl the typical
setbacks have been met that are required in a commercial zone.
She stated that the setback on University Avenue is 30 feet instead
of 35 feet, and along Mississippi and 66th Avenue the setback is
15 feet. She stated that the parking setback is only 15 feet
instead of 20 feet.
Ms. Dacy stated that the developer has proposed an extensive
screening plan to construct a six foot masonry wall along the north
lot line abutting 66th Avenue and on the east lot line. She stated
that staff recommends the planting of additional trees along the
north lot line.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 5
Ms. Dacy stated that, in regard to the Light Rail Transit (LRT)
issue, Mr. Yantos has sent a letter regarding this particular
proposal. She stated that, basically, it states that if this
development is constructed and the LRT is also located along this
route, Anoka County recommends University Avenue be the major
feeder route and a major pickup at.this site. She stated that this
would also act as a bus feeder site for dropping off passengers to
use the LRT.system.
Ms. Dacy stated that it was requested that the City reserve an
easement and, if a park-and-ride system is necessary, the County
could consider acquisition of the eight homes between 66th and 67th
Avenues for a park-and-ride lot. She stated this would necessitate
expansion of the driveway along the east side.
Ms. Dacy presented a video of the developers' other business center
in Minneapolis, Calhoun Village, and pointed out the building
materials that were used.
Ms. Dacy also presented a video of the traffic on Mississippi
Street between 5th Street and University Avenue that was taken
between 3:30 and 4:30 p.m. last Friday, June 1. She stated that
she did not observe any stackinq of the vehicles past the 10,000
Auto Parts site. Ms. Dacy stated that the majority of the
eastbound traffic on Mississippi Street is in the riqht hand lane
and tends to move over to the left hand lane. She felt that this
should not be a problem as there would be adequate time to make
this lane change. She stated that during this hour of filming, six
pedestrians were walking along Mississippi Street, but no one
crossed the street. She stated that there were also a number of
bicyclists along the north side of Mississippi Street. Ms. Dacy
stated the developers' plan is to move the driveway farther to the
east.
Mr. Dave Koski, Traffic Consultant with Barton-Aschman, stated that
a traffic study was conducted for the intersection of Mississippi
Street and University Avenue as well as 5th Street and Mississippi
Street. He stated that this was compared to a 1987 traffic count
conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. He stated
that, basically, the traffic volumes at the intersection have not
changed much between 1987 and now. He stated that they also
conducted an analysis of how the proposed development would affect
the traffic.
Mr. Koski stated that Barton-Aschman has been actively engaged in
surveying traffic generated by all types and sizes of developments
and utilizes a combination of their observed traffic generations,
as well as that produced by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, in
determining the amount of traffic this development would qenerate.
He stated that for a development of this type the peak retail
period is occurring during the peak traffic hours. He stated that
this is attributed to the fact that a lot of people are combining
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCZL MEETINQ OF JONE 4. 1990 PAGE 6
a shopping trip with the time they come home from work. He stated
that the peak traffic is between 4:30 and 5:30 at University Avenue
and Mississippi Street. Mr. Koski stated that a significant amount
of traffic, about 50 percent, going into this shoppinq center is
already traveling on the street, but he assumed for this study that
the traffic generated was all new traffic. -
Mr. Koski stated that, basically, they calculated the capacity of
the University/Mississippi intersection as it is today with
existing traffic, considered the new proposed configuration by the
County, and added the additional traffic for the shopping center.
He stated it was found that the intersection operates at a D level
of service. He stated that this scale is based on A being perfect
and F as failing. He stated that D is considered to be an
acceptable level of service in an urban area. He also stated that
if nothing was changed at the intersection and the improvements
were installed, the intersection would operate at a D+ or very
close to a C. Mr. Koski stated that it is felt that this shopping
center would not change the capacity of traffic generated at this
intersection. He stated that the primary reason for the level D
service at this intersection is on the west side. He stated that
the signal needs re-timing and re-phrasing.
Mr. Koski stated that they reviewed the impact of left turns for
vehicles eastbound on Mississippi Street and for left turns into
the site. He stated that there are sufficient gaps in the
' Mississippi Street westbound traffic to accommodate the demand to
turn left into the shopping center. He stated that there is
capacity available and the left turn would not have any significant
impact on the traffic on Mississippi Street. Mr. Koski stated that
the primary delay would be for traffic exiting the shopping center
to go eastbound on Mississippi Street but felt there would only be
a backup of several cars.
Mr. Koski stated that the impact the shopping center may have on
5th Street and Mississippi Street was not significant. He stated
that on a very conservative approach and assuming all the traffic
generated by the shopping center was new traffic, there would not
be a significant impact on the University/Mississippi and 5th
Street/Mississippi intersections.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of
this rezoning request. She stated that some of the members of the
Commission felt that because the site plan did not meet all the
setbacks, it was not appropriate. The majority of the members felt
that with the potential that some of this area would be used as an
LRT park-and-ride, they would prefer the site be used as such
rather than for this proposed development.
Ms. Dacy stated that staff's recommendation is for approval of the
rezoning with several stipulations.
�RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 7
Mr. Bob Guzy, attorney for the developers, stated that the
developers have been working with City staff and the HRA on their
plans for this development. He stated that he felt this was a good
project and that it would be another step in the City accomplishinq
their goals for the property. He stated that the revitalization
of Holly Center has benefitted the City and, with this development,
there would be three quadrants that would create the "halo" effect
and increase the development potential for the southwest quadrant.
Mr. Guzy stated that wherever there is redevelopment there are
potential conflicts. He stated that he wanted to ensure the
Council and neighborhood that the developer, Urban Commercial
Developers, and their anchor tenant, Walgreen's, will be a good
neighbor and a good corporate citizen. He stated that the Council
has to look at what is there now and what will happen when the
development is completed. He stated that the neighbors have talked
about this site being an eyesore. Mr. Guzy stated that the
developers worked with staff to have a pleasing development for the
neighbors and to provide the essential buffer. He stated that
there will be no funneling of traffic into the residential area and
that the flow of traffic is onto Mississippi Street.
Mr. Guzy stated that part of the site is already commercial and
that Council made a decision that this be a vital intersection in
the City. He stated that the development would also add to the tax
base which affects all citizens of Fridley. He stated that the
developers are working with the City to put this property back on
the tax rolls. He stated that Council has the option of making
this into a parking lot or making it a viable retail center that
can provide funds and other benefits to the citizens.
Mr. Guzy stated that it is essential to utilize the two houses and
existing vacant land that abuts 66th Avenue in order to make the
project feasible. He noted that a petition was received from
businesses in the area and stated that in Columbia Heights there
is a Snyder's and a Walqreen's within a block of each other and
both and doing good business.
Mr. Guzy stated that he is aware that the Planning Commission is
concerned about the LRT issue. He stated that, in the future,
there probably will be an LRT system on University Avenue.
However, the question is if this would in any way prevent this
project from proceeding. He stated that the bird in hand theory
should not be diverted because of something in the future that
could, potentially, occur. He stated that this project fits well
with the City's plans, adds to the tax base, and creates jobs. He
stated that it would not diminish retail competition but instead
increase it.
Mr. Reese, the Project Architect, presented a drawinq of the
proposed site plan. He stated that the construction materials are
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JQNE �. 1990 PAGE 8
pre-finished masonry units with a metal roof over the front canopy.
He stated that the buildinq is designed to fit in with the
neighborhood.
Mr. Schuette, UCD, stated that the center would be a 28,000 square
foot neighborhood convenience center. He stated that there is a
demand in Fridley for additional retailers who want to bring new
concepts and ideas to the City. He stated that the anchor tenant
would be Walgreen's, utilizing 11,000 square feet of the space,
with six or seven other shops that would total 17,000 square feet.
He stated that, for a comparison, Holly Center is about 75,000
square feet.
Mr. Schuette stated that this center would not bring anyone from
across town to Fridley. He stated that it is designed for
neighborhood use and that it may contain such stores as an
insurance office, hair salon, video store, Chinese restaurant, etc.
Mr. Schuette reviewed the site plan and stated that the center
would be entered by one driveway on the east of the site.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked the location of Walgreen's loading
dock. Mr. Schuette stated that it is along the east side of the
building.
Councilwoman Jorgenson questioned the width of the road. Mr.
Schuette stated that it is 23 feet.
Ms. Dacy stated on that the on the west side of the building it is
20 feet.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked about snow removal for this site. Mr.
Schuette stated that their plans are to have the snow removed from
the site.
Councilman Schneider asked the approximate value of the center
after it is constructed.
Mr. Schuette stated that construction costs, including costs of the
plan are over $2,000,000, and the perceived val.ue when the center
is finished is over $3,000,000.
Councilman Schneider stated that he felt the Planning Commissian
recommendation was strongly influenced by the LRT issue. He asked
Mr. Yantos, from a practical and realistic viewpoint, what would
be the earliest LRT would be in operation.
Mr. Yantos, representing the Anoka County Regional Railroad
Authority, stated that the earliest would probably be about seven
years.
�RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 9
Councilman Schneider asked how soon a decision would be made on the
kiss-and-ride at this location.
Mr. Yantos stated that a station is being planned for Mississippi
Street and University Avenue. .
Councilman Schneider stated that there are some options for
additional parking, but this may require the acquisition of homes.
He questioned when this decision would be made.
Mr. Yantos stated that the decision would be made between now and
when construction begins five or six years from now. He stated
that the homes to the north of this site would seriously be
considered for parking.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked why a park-and-ride was not being
considered at the Columbia Arena site.
Mr. Yantos stated that in looking at station space and movement of
people they are trying to keep the stations approximately one mile
apart. He stated that they are also considering the east/west
access which is important. He stated that it is very expensive
and it really does not make sense to construct a station and to
have one kiss-and-ride with another just a short distance to the
north. Mr. Yantos stated all of the stations, at least north of
37th Avenue, would be park-and-ride.
Councilman Schneider asked if kiss-and-ride was not in the planning
at this time.
Mr. Yantos stated that it is in the plan but, as the planning
continues, the need for park-and-ride will certainly be there.
Mayor Nee stated that this is a surprise.
Mr. Yantos stated that as they continue to work with the various
communities they did not want to say they were only going to have
a kiss-and-ride or drop-off for buses and cars as the potential
for park-and-ride is very strong.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many park-and-rides were planned
for Fridley.
Mr. Yantos stated three: one at 57th Avenue, one at Mississippi
Street, and one at Osborne Road.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how much land is needed for these
sites.
Mr. Yantos stated that enough space to accommodate 200 to 300 cars
or about a two to three acre site at each of these intersections.
_ _ ___
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAGE 10
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the property would be owned by the
City or the County.
Mr. Yantos stated that it would be owned by the Railroad Authority.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if it would be tax exempt. Mr. Yantos
stated that he assumed it would be tax exempt.
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if a route has been established south
of I-694. Mr. Yantos stated that this has not, as yet, been set.
Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Yantos what has led to the change
in plans.
Mr. Yantos stated that, as various committees have been meeting and
focusing on the needs, the ridership is being reviewed, and one
concern is to remove traffic from the City streets. He stated that
they did not want people parking in front of homes on residential
streets. He also stated that the committees have become more
serious about park-and-ride.
Councilman Billings stated that he finds it very enlightening to
be hearing this information since he was not aware of it, and he
is the Council's representative to the Anoka County Regional
Railroad Authority.
Mr. Yantos stated that they have reviewed this site in the
northeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue and
worked with the developers to provide space for a kiss-and-ride
along with an easement for potential parking to the north.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many stations would be required
as LRT proceeds south.
Mr. Yantos stated that stations would be located at 53rd, 49th,
44th, and 40th Avenues, and St. Anthony Boulevard.
Councilwoman asked if these would be park-and-ride facilities or
kiss-and-ride. Mr. Yantos stated that they would be park-and-ride.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that Mr. Yantos is talking about
major development areas in the City that would be turned into tax
exempt property for park-and-ride areas.
Mr. Yantos stated that they have thought about having parking
beneath office and retail buildings. He stated that there are
other alternatives to use the space beneath the office and retail
buildings other than just for parking.
Councilman Schneider stated that residents in the neighborhood are
concerned about traffic. He asked if this was being taken into
consideration with park-and-ride.
FRIDLEY CITY CO CIL ME TINa OF JIIN$ 4• 1990 PAGB 11
Mr. Douq Moore, Associate with BRW, stated that the parking volume
would depend on the size of the particular park-and-ride lot. He
stated park-and-ride traffic would still use the entrance into the
site. However, it would have to be widened and the Railroad
Authority consider acquisition of additional property as well.
Councilman Schneider asked if any of these homes were for sale, if
the Railroad Authority would consider purchasing them.
Mr. Yantos stated that he did not believe they would consider any
purchases within the next six months. However, if property was
available at the 10, 000 Auto Parts site and it did not conflict
with the City's goals, the Railroad Authority probably would
consider purchasinq it.
Councilman Billings stated that two weeks ago there was discussion
about the possibility of constructing a station on the southeast
corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, asked if any thought has been given for
ingress and egress off University Avenue for this future site.
Councilman Billings stated that throughout the planning process it
has been his understanding that the Railroad Authority was going
to look at a bus and passenger drop-off at this particular
location. He stated that once the LRT system was in operation tHe
additional 25 spaces along University Avenue may be needed.
stated if, in the future, it was found that the ridership has
increased, then at that time a deterraination would be made as to
the need for additional parking.
Mr. Erickson, UCD, stated that this is what he had heard from Mr.
Yantos. He stated, basically, the Railroad Authority was going to
establish a station and, if and when parking would be needed,
would be determined by the demand. He stated that as of now, they
have no way to determine whether parking would or would not be
required.
Councilman Billings stated that even though he serves on an
intergovernmental agency committee, it appears the committee is
serving no function other than for someone to be able to say the
City had input. He stated that it seems the decisions are made
elsewhere and the committee is nothing more than a sham. He stated
that he gets more fed up all the time. He stated that, recently,
the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and Transportation Board
decided to begin a bus service for Anoka County except for Columbia
Heights and Fridley. He stated that maybe it is time Fridley went
back to Ramsey County.
Councilman Billings stated that he is totally shocked to get this
far in the planning process encouraging the developer to work with
the Railroad Authority and then find they have now changed their
�RIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JDNE 4. 1990 PAGE 12
philosophy of thinking. He stated that he doubted if this project
would have gone this far if the City had been given this
information six months ago.
Mr. Bill Hogan, 365 Mississippi Street, stated that the driveway
to this shopping center site is, in reality, being moved .only about
80 feet east. He stated that �with the improvements to the
intersection the center median will be located just below the
Marsolek property.
Ms. Dacy stated that the existing most easterly driveway is being
moved approximately 80 feet to the east, but from the University
Avenue curb line, it would be about 360 feet to increase the
reaction time. She stated that with the improvement of the
intersection there would be dedicated stacking lanes into the
shopping center site.
Mr. Hogan stated that the original improvement plan for that
intersection did not provide left turn lanes because there was no
development on this site.
Ms. Dacy stated that when the improvement plans were first
completed for the intersection, the redevelopment of this site was
not contemplated and the County was to locate the median just short
of the existing driveway of this site. She stated that with this
development proposal there is an advantage to moving the access
farther to the east and provide a left turn lane into the site.
Mr. Hogan stated that adjustments have been made on the north side
of the shopping center to allow more landscaping, but he was
concerned about the amount of space on the east side of the
development. He stated that most of the drawings do not show the
homes next to the proposed wall. However, the wall would be only
13 to 14 feet from his home. He felt that there was not room for
landscaping, and if the road was widened for a park and ride lot,
he assumed the wall would be located closer to his home.
Councilman Billings asked Mr. Hogan what he felt would be a good
use of this site.
Mr. Hogan stated that he had not given it much thought but has
usually thought about some kind of commercial development. He
stated this proposed development moves closer to his home.
Mr. Thayer, 377 - 66th Avenue, stated that he was opposed to the
rezoning. He stated that he believed the site is too small even
with acquisition of the two residential lots. He stated that the
setbacks would be less than what is normally allowed for this type
of development. He stated that another concern is snow storage,
and he believed it would be several days before the area could be
used if there is a heavy snowfall. Mr. Thayer felt that the single
combined entrance and exit is a disaster, and those who want to
�RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINS 4. 1990 PAGE 13
proceed eastbound will have a problem exiting. He stated that he
believed this would begin destruction of the neighborhood through
the domino theory.
Mr. Thayer stated that he felt a mistake was made when the existing
construction was allowed on this site, and he did not believe the
shopping center is the best use of this property. He stated that
he believed development in the southwest corner of University
Avenue and Mississippi Street and the 100 Twin property should be
completed before this site. He stated that Mississippi Street is
the main east/west thoroughfare and deliberately addinq traffic
without a well thought-out plan would be a terrible mistake. He
felt that if the City has any long-range plans, they should let the
residents know so they can make their plans accordingly.
Councilman Billings stated that he is confused as to how this
development impacts the southwest quadrant or the 100 Twin site.
Mr. Thayer stated that the "halo" effect would spill over into the
southwest corner. He stated that his personal reaction is that if
the southwest quadrant is completed it would probably remove this
site as a location for this type of shopping center. He felt that
something much more viable could be constructed on this site.
Councilman Billings asked Mr. Thayer what he would envision for
this site.
Mr. Thayer stated that his basis for saying it is not a good
development is because it is so restrictive in size. He stated
that this shopping center would only be located on a little over
two acres. He felt that if the size was doubled a viable shopping
center could be constructed with better access and sufficient
shops. He felt that some type of multi-story building should be
considered and a determination made as to what is the best possible
use of the land.
Councilman Schneider asked if Mr. Thayer felt a multi-story
building should be retail or housing.
Mr. Thayer stated that there are multi-story buildings where the
first level is all parking and felt this would also meet the LRT
needs if it becomes a reality. He stated that the rest of the
space could be used for different offices.
Mayor Nee stated that it is very difficult for the City to spell
out exactly what they want on a site and then have it completed.
He stated that the market usually dictates what a developer or
those financing a project want to construct. He stated that this
proposal for the site is the most realistic one that as far as he
has seen it is being responsive to the City's concerns.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 1�
Mr. Thayer asked if the developer would still proceed with this
project if he was not provided with any of the incentives.
Mayor Nee felt that no one would remove the existinq building
without some incentive. He stated that there has been absolutely
no investment in that structure since it was constructed.
Mr. Thayer asked if the development would improve the quality of
life for adjacent residents.
Councilwoman Jorgenson felt that it would, to some degree, and
believed it would also benefit the senior citizens living on the
east side of University Avenue.
Mayor Nee did not believe that there would be any adverse effects
for those living further down the block. However, he stated the
people immediately across the street may feel uncomfortable with
the wall. He also stated that he views the existing building as
almost a cancer and the economics are such that no one is going to
invest in it. He stated that he is convinced there will not be a
park-and-ride at this site.
Mr. Thayer stated that his problem is to make sure that what is
constructed on this site is the best for him. He expressed
disapproval when the existing building was constructed, he also
stated that he did not want this to happen again.
Ms. Louise Bennethum, 368 - 66th Avenue, stated that they have
lived in their home for over thirty years, and this is the best
proposal they have seen. She stated that when Red Owl was a tenant
of the building, it was not pleasant to live next door as they had
rats, noise, smells, etc. She stated that she constantly worried
about a fire in the field because it was not mowed. She also felt
that the situation would only get worse unless the Council approved
this rezoning. Ms. Bennethum felt that the development would
provide a much needed improvement over what is now existing on the
site.
Councilman Billings asked Ms. Bennethum if her property was one
that was being acquired to which she answered in the affirmative.
Ms. Terry Mau, 7343 Hayes Street, stated that as a homeowner and
business owner in Fridley she would like nothing more than to see
the southwest corner develop. She stated that she can sympathize
with the owners of the property because they do not want to make
improvements when there is uncertainty and talk of redevelopment.
She felt that homes should be constructed on this site as it is not
a good area for a business. Ms. Mau stated that the area is small,
and this center would be a large development for this site. She
stated that the parking allowed for employees is not sufficient as
they have more parking.avail�ble at their Rice Plaza Center, and
there still is a parking problem.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 15
Councilman Billinqs asked if the southwest quadrant was redeveloped
where Ms. Mau would consider moving her business.
Ms. Mau stated that she hoped any redevelopment would allow her to
relocate in the same area.
Counailman Billings stated that he was surprised that business
owners located in Rice Plaza submitted a petition as he felt the
development of this site may allow them to relocate to this site
which would be in the same vicinity.
Ms. Mau stated that she felt there is a problem with access to this
site. She stated that Rice Plaza has two entrances and exits where
there is not a worse traffic situation in Fridley.
Ms. Brenda Tibbets, 421 Mississippi Street, stated that they have
a problem entering and exiting their driveway. She felt that the
senior citizens would also have problems crossing Mississippi
Street. She stated that the existing building is an eyesore but
felt the shopping center was too large for the site, and the
parking would not be adequate. She questioned why improvements
could not be made to the existing building rather than acquiring
people's homes.
Ms. Marilyn Sullivan, 522 - 66th Avenue, stated that she agrees
with the decision of the Planning Commission to table the rezoning
at this time. She felt that the LRT issue needs to be resolved
before development occurs on this site. She stated that she did
not feel the neighborhood would benefit from this development. Ms.
Sullivan stated that this site is a prime location for a park-and-
ride for the LRT system. She stated that she did not feel the
traffic studies provided significant details and that they need to
be conducted over several weeks and months. She stated that the
impact on the neighborhood deserves priority, and it seems wrong
to remove homes and erode the neighborhood. Ms. Sullivan felt the
site should be developed to be compatible with park-and-ride. She
suggested that perhaps a day care center or a nursing home should
be developed.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is a moratorium on the
construction of nursing homes. She stated that as far as a day
care center, with the traffic and playground facilities that would
be necessary, this site would not be feasible. She stated that in
regard to the LRT, the Council was told this would be a kiss-and-
ride site, and that people would park at Columbia Arena and be
bussed to this site.
Mr. George Meissner, 373 Mississippi Street, stated that he did
not believe this rezoning would benefit his property. He stated
that it is difficult now to access his home, and the situation
would only get worse. He belieVed that if a shopping center is
constructed it would generate � lot of traffic. He stated that,
as it is now, it sometimes takes him tive ofnutes to get out of his
FRIDL�Y CITY COUNCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGB 16
driveway. Mr. Meissner stated that the site is relatively small,
and even Holly Center, which is much larger, has been hurting for
tenants. He felt that the Council also has to take into
consideration the possibility of an LRT system and a park-and-ride
at this location. He stated that he was opposed to the rezoning.
Councilman Billings asked Mr. Meissner why he chanqed his mind
about the rezoning since, at one time, he felt the rezoning should
cover an even larger area.
Mr. Meissner stated that nothing has changed his mind. He stated
that the area is quite small and, if there is going to be
development, the area needs to be larger.
Mayor Nee questioned the effect of a park-and-ride Iot on that
site.
Mr. Koski stated that when they conducted their study, the LRT
issue was discussed with Mr. Yantos and Mr. Moore. He stated,
however, there was not a conclusion on the amount of parking or
type of traffic. He stated that they reviewed the park-and-ride
situation and the parking that might occur for the bus system. He
stated it seems that the amount of parking adjacent to Mississippi
Street and University Avenue would not have that much impact. Mr.
Koski stated that with a park-and-ride the primary activity occurs
at different hours than the shopping center's business. He stated
that the primary exit for park-and-ride would be between 5:00 and
6: 00 p.m. , and the shopping center would not be open in the morning
hours when park-and-ride would have its heaviest use. He stated
that the entry/exit roadway would certainly have to be improved to
the extent that it was wide enough to accommodate the extra
traffic.
Mr. Grant Olson, 390 - 67th Avenue, stated that there are a lot of
vacancies now for retail space and that most of the traffic using
Mississippi Street comes from 7th Street, which was not included
in the traffic counts.
Mayor Nee stated that as far as vacant retail space the City does
not control who builds, but that it is the judgment of the
developers and the ones providing the financial backing.
Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Olson makes a very valid
point. He stated that with the 100 Twin site the City had
wonderful proposals, but nothing has materialized. He stated that
it appears with this development that there are committed tenants
for this shopping center.
Ms. Patricia Anderson, 3667 - 66th Avenue, stated that she was
opposed to this development because of the LRT issue. She stated
that if one does or does not support the development the
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAQE 17
possibility of removinq homes on 66th and 67th Avenues is something
she cannot accept. She stated that to remove homes in an area that
is not blighted is not acceptable.
Councilman Billings stated that he had several concerns. He stated
that he did not receive the traffic study from Barton-Aschman until
this evening which did not allow him adequate time for review. He
also stated that as he has been following this development project,
he was under the assumption that a station for LRT would possibly
be located on this corner. He stated, however, the intent was a
bus point and passenger drop-off, and he now understands they need
a parking lot immediately. He stated that he would like further
clarification on the Railroad Authority's thouqhts.
Councilman Billings stated that as recently as two weeks ago, the
Railroad Authority was investigating if the LRT station could be
on the southeast corner of University Avenue and Mississippi
Street. He stated that one of the reasons they are looking at this
northeast corner is because it is a recommendation of the City's
Planning Commission. He stated that if they had not recommended
this site the Railroad Authority probably would still have been
considering Columbia Arena. He stated that he is sometimes
confused as to the Planning Commission's direction. He stated that
this site could generate up to $100,000 in property taxes and to
have this be used for LRT boggles his mind.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that it is very difficult to have a
piece of property in limbo for seven to ten years waiting for a
decision on the LRT system.
Mr. Yantos stated that it is a difficult situation because they are
talking concepts. He stated that the Railroad Authority has looked
seriously at this northeast corner, and the concept today is to
take 31 parking spots from the south end for a park-and-ride and,
in the future, if more parking is needed they will need to acquire
eight homes to the north. He stated that they also looked at the
possibility for a station in the southeast corner. He stated that
each time they meet new information does evolve. He stated that
the Council will have the opportunity to review the final plans in
four to six months.
Councilwoman Jorgenson's concern was what the City is supposed to
do in the meantime. She felt that development plans could not be
set aside for the sites the Railroad Authority is contemplating to
use as this could seriously impact the City financially.
Mr. Yantos stated that they are aware of this; however, the process
takes a long time. He stated that he can understand the difficulty
in planning, but all they can do is provide information they have
to date.
F�IDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 18
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that none of the corners the Railroad
Authority is contemplating for use of the LRT system is vacant.
She asked if they had considered the impact on the owners of the
land and if they would be relocated.
Mr. Yantos stated that they are reviewing it but do not have any
concrete answers.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the Council would not review the
plan for six months and then construction would not begin for seven
years. She stated that she was concerned that people would have
to put their properties on hold for this period until the Railroad
Authority makes a decision.
Mr. Yantos stated that planning, development, and change is
happening continuously. He stated that people and public bodies
need to make changes as they see fit. He stated that he is here
to inform them that LRT and park-and-ride is a possibility. He
stated that they have looked at kiss-and-ride as a first stage of
development, but there is also the potential for a park-and-ride.
Councilman Billings stated that he felt he needed clarification on
the Railroad Authority's plans for this location before a decision
can be made on this development proposal. He stated that he
understood the emphasis would be on drop off for the Mississippi
station. However, he seems to be hearing something different.
He stated that he would like this information in two weeks.
Mr. Yantos stated that the Railroad Authority did take action on
this piece of property to work with the developer to provide the
easement for a drop off or kiss-and-ride.
Mayor Nee stated that he envisioned a park-and-ride would be in
response to a future demand.
Mr. Yantos stated that he apologized for the misunderstanding, but
he was only trying to provide the long-term picture of what might
happen.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to continue the public hearing on
this rezoning to June 18, 1990. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Billings stated that information would be received from
the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority and, depending on what
information is received, the Council may take additional testimony.
He stated that if there is no new information, the Council could
take action on June 18 or may not take action for another two
weeks. He stated that he did not know what would happen until the
Council receives this infornaation.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAG$ 19
RECESS•
Mayor Nee called a recess at 11:05 p.m.
RECONVENED•
Mayor Nee reconvened the meeting at 11:19 p.m. All Council members
were present.
2. �2EZONING ZOA #90-03 BY BOB'S AMOCO. TO REZONE LOT 1. BLOCK
� LAMPERT'S ADDITION FROM M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. TO C-2,
GENERAL BUSINESS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.
jAMOCO OIL SERVICE STATIONI:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman
Billings. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
11:20 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request for
a rezoning in the southwest corner of Osborne Road and Highway 65
from light industrial to commercial. She stated that the Planning
Commission has recommended approval of this rezoning due to the
fact that all four corners of this intersection have become
commercial.
Ms. Dacy stated that in conjunction with this rezoning, the
petitioner has filed for a special use permit and variance. She
stated that the special use permit is to reconstruct the pump
islands in front of the gas station and construct a car wash in
the rear. She stated that the variance for the lot size would not
be needed if the property is rezoned. Ms. Dacy stated that the
other two variances are to reduce the hard surface setback from 20
feet to 10 and 5 feet and reduce the side yard setback from 30 feet
to 4 feet.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission and Appeals Commission
have recommended approval of these requests for the special use
permit and variances with stipulations.
No persons in the audience spoke for or against this proposed
rezoning.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 11:26 p.m.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 20
OLD BUSINESS•
3. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY
CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND
AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF:
Councilman Billings asked if the two property owners to the north
were contacted in regard to the storage shed.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that they have not been
contacted.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
3.1 CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS:
RESIGNATION - ALEX BARNA:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to accept, with regret, Mr.
Barna's resignation from the Planning Commission. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to nominate Connie Modig for
appointment to the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman
Billings.
There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by
Mayor Nee.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the
appointment of Connie Modig, 1330 Hillcrest Drive, to the at-large
Planning Commission seat for the term which expires April 1, 1993.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ENVIRONMENTAL UALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to nominate Susan Price for
appointment to the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick.
There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by
Mayor Nee.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the
appointment of Susan Price, 7449 Melody Drive, to the Environmental
Quality and Energy Commission to the term expirinq April 1, 1993.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JUNE 4. 1990 PAGB 21
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
APPEALS COMMISSION:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorqenson to nominate Catherine Smith for
appointment to the Appeals Commission. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick.
There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by
Mayor Nee.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to cast a unanimous ballot for
the appointment of Catherine Smith, 6548 Clover Place, to the
Appeals Commission to the term expiring April 1, 1991. Seconded
by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
�_N RESOURCES COMMISSION:
MOTION by Councilwoman
Seconded by Councilman
aye, Mayor Nee declared
NEW BUSINESS•
Jorgenson to table this appointment.
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
the motion carried unanimously.
4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY
16. 1990:
A. ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 18 1990 ON A REZONING, ZOA
#90-04 BY THE LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE LODGE 38, TO REZONE THE
NORTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND 15 BROOKVIEW ADDITION. EXCEPT
THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE NORTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND 15,
BROOKVIEW ADDITION AND ALSO THE SOUTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND
15 BROOKVIEW ADDITION EXCEPT THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE SOUTH
95 FEET FROM R-3 GENERAL MULTIPLE DWELLING, TO C-2, GENERAL
$USINESS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6875 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this
rezoning request, ZOA #90-04, for June 18, 1990. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
The Council received the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting
of May 16, 1990.
FRIDLSY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 22
5. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #90-03 BY BOB'S AMOCO PER SECTION
205 14 O1 C(6) OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALi,OW A MOTOR
VEHICLE WASH ESTABLISHMENT ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1. LAMPERT'S
ADDITIO�T GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N E. (AMOCO OIL
SERVICE STATION):
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to�concur with the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP #90-
03, with the followir►g stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall
submit a landscape plan prior to the issuance of a building permit;
(2) approval of the variance request, VAR #90-04; (3) joint
driveway/parking easements shall be recorded against both the Amoco
and the VFW parcels; (4) a grading and drainage plan shall be
submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit; and (5) the
existing mercury light standards shall be replaced with more modern
high pressure sodium standards. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
6. VARIANCE RE UEST VAR #90-04 BY BOB'S AMOCO, TO REDUCE THE
SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE A DRIVEWAY IS TO BE PROVIDED FROM 30
FEET TO 4 FEET: TO REDUCE THE LOT AREA RE4UIRED FOR ONE MAIN
BUILDING ON PLATS RECORDED BEFORE JANUARY 1. 1993 , FROM THREE-
FOURTHS (3/4) ACRE (36 679 S4UARE FEET) TO TWO-THIRDS (2/3)
ACRE (29.040 S4UARE FEET): TO REDUCE THE PARKING AND HARD
SURFACE SETBACK FROM ANY STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM 20 FEET TO
10 FEET AND 5 FEET; TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED
CAR WASH AND NEW PUMP LAYOUT ON LOT 1 BLOCK 1. LAMPERT' S
ADDITION. THE SAME BEZNG 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N E.:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that staff has proposed two
alternatives providing for a different angle on the pumps and a
detached car wash facility. She stated that the Appeals Commission
was convinced it would be better to approve the variance. She
stated that staff is recommending the variance be denied as there
are other alternatives.
Councilman 5chneider asked if staff was comfortable with the
Appeals Commission's action.
Ms. Dacy stated that the proposal is certainly an improvement as
far as the traffic situation. She stated that the proposal
certainly will not be a detriment.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation
of the Appeals Commission and grant variance request, VAR #90-04,
with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall work
with City staff and the VFW to resolve building code and traffic
issues; (2) approval of the special use permit request; and (3)
approval of the rezoning request. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
FRTDTFY CiTY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 23
7. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA, BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING
DISTRICTS:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the readinq and approve the
ordinance upon first reading subject to approval of the variance
application. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
8. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12 07 OF THE CITY
HARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C
OF THE CITY CODE•
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading and approve the
ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
9. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR ONONDAGA STREET STORM
SEWER REPAZR PROJECT NO. 209:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for
Project No. 209:
Insituform Central, Inc.
6167 North Kent Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53217 538,801.20
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a bid for this
project was received from the sole producer of the insituform
system, Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20. He
stated that $30,000 was allocated, and it is recommended that the
contract be awarded and a transfer of $8,801.20 be authorized from
the Storm Water Utility Fund to Project. No. 209 in order to
complete the project.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for Project
No. 209 to Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the transfer of
$8,801.20 from the Storm Water Utility Fund to Storm Sewer Repair
Project No. 209. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 24
10. RESOLUTION NO 33-1990 AUTHORIZING REAPPROPRIATIONS IN THE
1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE BENEFITS AND COMPARABLE
WORTH ADJtJSTMENTS FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that this
resolution would authorize a transfer of $37,015 from the emergency
reserve to provide for comparable worth adjustments and benefits
for temporary employees.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 33-1990.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. A�PpnTNTMFNT• CITY EMPLOYEE:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick
appointment by the City Manager:
Starting
Name Position ala
Mark Public
Foster Services
Worker
Mechanic B
Non-exempt
to concur with the following
Starting
ate
$13.50 June 18,
per hour 1990
$28,188.00
per year
Replaces
Robert
Anderson
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
12. CLAIMS•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claims No.
32213 through 32379. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
13. LICENSES•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted
and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
14. �STIMATES•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as
submitted:
FRIDLSY CZTY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 25
Herrick & Newman
205 Fridley Plaza Office Bldg.
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, 1rIId 55432
Services Rendered as City Attorney �
For the Month of May, 1990 .�. . . . . . . . $ 3,528.00
E. H. Renner & Sons
15688 Janis Street N.W.
Elk River, igi 55330
Repair and Maintenance
of Well No. 3
Project No. 203
FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,632.00
Ganimon Bros . , Inc .
13845 Northdale Boulevard
Rogers, MN 55374
Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2
Estimate No. 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13, 301. 08
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Billings stated that when he attacked the Anoka County
Board for their adoption of a plan that did not include Fridley and
Columbia Heights he wanted to note that Commissioners McCarron and
Kordiak are working to include Fridley and Columbia Heights. He
stated it was the Regional Transit Board that omitted Fridley and
Columbia Heights.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously, and the Regular Meeting
of the Fridley City Council of June 4, 1990 adjourned at 11:43 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
�
�
cinroF
F���
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
C011IlMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
MEM�RANDUM
June 15, 1990
f
William Burns, City Manager
Jock Robertson, Community Development Direotor
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Continuation of Public Hearing for a Rezoning
Request, ZOA #90-02, Fridley Town Square
Associates
The City Council at the June 4, 1990 meeting continued the public
hearing for the above-referenced request in order to continue
testimony about the rezoning. The Anoka County Regional Rail
Authority was also to contact the City regarding its policy for a
park-and-ride site at the Mississippi Street and University Avenue
intersection.
At the June 13, 1990 LRT Technical Advisory Committee meeting,
alternative locations for the station and park-and-ride lot in the
southeast quadrant were discussed. Tim Yantos advised us that
Commissioner Paul McCarron will be transmitting a letter to the
City late this week regarding the Rail Authority's position on this
issue. Yantos stated that if the letter is not available for the
preparation of the aqenda packet, it will be delivered to the City
Council as soon as possible.
Another concern raised at the June 4, 1990 meeting was the traffic
impact of both the park-and-ride facility and the proposed shopping
center sharing the same access point. We have asked Dave Koski of
Barton-Aschman to investigate this issue further. Koski will be
available at the June 18, 1990 meeting to present more information
about this topic.
Two project modifications have been identified as a result of the
June 4, 1990 meeting. One modification would be to expand the
limits of the Center City redevelopment project area to include
acquisition of the two adjacent homes on Mississippi Street and
66th Avenue (365 Mississippi Street and 370 - 66th Avenue). This
would create a larger buffer between the proposed shopping center
and the existing single family homes. However, the tax increment
district should not be extended to include these lots so as to not
1
1A
Fridley Town Square Associates
June 15, I990
Page 2
increase the base value for the district without a corresponding
increase in value to generate additional increment. Further, in
addition to acquisition costs, the City would also be responsible
for relocation costs (which may total up to $20,000 under the
Federal Uniform Relocation Act provisions), demolition costs (which
are estimated to be $3,000), house moving costs as well as
Iandscaping and restoration costs to provide a buffer in this area.
These expenditures are also compounded by a loss of tax revenue
from the two homes in the amount of $1,200. Given all of these
factors, this alternative is not cost-effective.
The second modification would be to reduce the building size in
order to provide more area along the east lot line immediately
adjacent to 370 - 66th Avenue to increase the buffer between the
existing single family home and the development. The home at 370 -
66th Avenue is within 3-feet of the lot line, and is therefore
considered nonconforminq. The existing site plan provides a five
foot setback which will contain the six foot masonry rock face
wall. Reducing the building length by five feet will increase the
setback to a ten foot separation only for the house at 370 - 66th
Avenue. Because of the jog in the lot line, reducing the building
length would not serve as an advantage to the home at 36S
Mississippi Street. The driveway and parking areas would have to
be significantly realigned. The developer has indicated that he
is willing to meet with these property owners and provide
additional landscaping in areas where they desire instead of
reducing the size of the building.
Recommendation
Council consideration of first reading of the ordinance approving
the rezoning has been scheduled later on this agenda. Recommended
stipulations are proposed.
BD/dn
M-90-416
R�Ot
�'�Ms
L�ITSt
sa�,78crs
Engineenna
Sewer
Water
Parhs
Streets
Ma�ntenanc�
MEMORANDUM
Willi�aam W. Bt�s� CitY Mar�er
Jd'm G. F1o�a,��Pub1iC Wo�ks Direc.'�ta�
J'�u�e 14, 1990
Ii�i' Tec�nical Re�iie�1 C�armitteB
PW90-230
1B
�e xoztheas-t oorric3o� �tu�ical �aevie�r �mitt,ee met an wec'�esaay, Jt.a�s 13,
1990, at tile I�uLicipal C�enter.
�e oc��uter mod�el ,-i�,�,ip forec.�st �ras pr�sertted to the C7cnmittee. Ba.sed t�an
their analysis a�d ap�oacii to th�e p�nblem, it appeais that by the year 2010,
an additioc�al 6, 000 rideis are foreca_st fa� an LRT syst�t. �e 9ra� requested
that ridership infonnatioci be p�+wided by station ar�d by the area frcm �ich ti�ey
r�une. �is infoYmation will be pmvicied in the future.
Zt�e Mississippi ar�d University station was di.�sed foeusiryg an the svutiyeast ..
quadrant. It appears that the statian is nat prudent at this lxatian as it
wwld r�notie ttye servive ro�cl which prwid�s ir�gl'ess at�d egrr�sss fo� the Fblioe
and Fire ve�icles. In additian, we loaked at the vacant lats in front of the
Fridley Plaza Clinic. It was felt that this was tflo far r�ov�ed fe� p�er
pedestrian aooess to the Cent�r City oor�t. It appears that the c�urent
position is to look at a k,iss- � ri-ride oc► the rprth�ast quadrarYt with the optian
to const�vct a P�� �P �� T� P�'kiTi9 lat as an extensian to the
LRT facility if it �ras neec1ed in the future.
A�le for develapnent of the LitT syste�n irr,ludincJ the variu�s Public
hearir�gs, env;,�+�*,i-a� ar�d eoornmic analysis styows that we are loak at a 10-
year ti.me frame before the first train will nu► based i�on dailY P�'��9 of
the I� . A000niux3ly, it would appear. that the IRT in the
rostheast quartei i.s scme time beyond 10 yeats.
'1'he �3iT am�++.-+rized tt�g meetir�q that the Mettr�olitan �amcil oo[�Y.ted
regazdinq lar�d use develapa�t associated with the LKr lit�es in oti�s cities at�d
cauntries. ��y w�ere fawrably ;� � with the fa�,t praper plar�inc� ar�d lar�d
use revisian will in faat anpliment the LRT system.
Zhe ne�ct a�eeting was sd�uled feac �nn�sday, July 19, 1990, at 8:30 a.m. in ths
I�Du�icipal C7errter.
JGF/ts
oc: Jock Robertsan
..
•.. �
I___.
ZOA ��90-02
U.C.D.
N 1/2 SEC. /4, T. 30, R. 24
C/TY OF FR/OLEY �
�\ � ,
21 ��
wv. cwlwE� „u
SEC./�
.f���
rT�
12
g :r "
� + � ; 3 ` � � � 3 � 1 •. •/
, � � ' ° � f , i � •' \. a � � .� / _ . � ' s � ` � ` .+�' • . .
, ` = > � � . '�c 2 ' ;.. .. � � Rice
- ; [` �. 2�4. `2 � �I y� ���'��i i �/ �(� �B ' � � y � �� �' . i
� d� ' � �i. � � + + `/�`r •` '� ,E ���j � y � �� '�
� �I ,l I .o.. �� W• ,i r3'~ `� ' r �! " �• •� � yI f Y • • i!
�L«J ��:�. W � i` � � � U = , � � i 1 �� � '-1_
� ¢ ' i s ' �/ ��� � i� , _�
� � i `' u • / � ` � �` � ;./ _ "r' ,.- `
I i i O ��0' �� ��0� � � S F, ' L . � . � \ (v j� w �! ♦ t/ , ' '?
� l � � � �! s� i9i . • � - �• r • � .t.
., - � r,, �' ,. '�'• ru , , d� , � � -�+ '° �';,) , " • F . i
l� � ':' . , Q'�' W � �' +-:• (v � +y'.. ' � °' ' �
-r" : �'. . , i. � f. - ; � ♦ - .,
, p� i. , . „ � �. .t�i � � . � � 6 •• � • :
� W , ? W � ,, .',, `�, � ,�'. ', ` -��,� ,. . `1 �
. j • + '� ` U �/ �r i ' � � � ` • u� , f `
�\� F Q 9 1 Q O< � � �a ,:� r. ''�
I . I �\ \�o , � 4 . � 5, •j f y2 i�•� .� • �. ' � ,
it t�- ; ct 1 '-�� ,'� � �' � • 0 "s�` � � " �` � : 'a • , 1:
i � ' �� \ � �I`t., _ et'f 9 � ..,.�j,I � �t� � �'4 ' .� �' �►, -
• �/ • -
, y . .. k `e �, � �. , M Z
; f ��, � � ,� ,s: �o �� _ * � ,�� , f y y ' •Z . _ z .3� 5 � r . a
r,+ � � i� <� �,: �M« / � :�/�Ft► .�� 4� ' 1= ,F.` �Y�...�: p -
� Z � � � • � ' � 1►�,. n �c 4/ t •� � �
�, � � �� � E,3'� ' , � T�y � 'e ?' . ' -�
i • - � ` / `� _�> I��, •�" ' "' '`. 5 �� , ' - .i_ .4,. J �
I` '�' t t ''? ` dY` ' -, ` .4� y � ° ' �
' , � � j r E, �r ' �4 ' 2, F � r
� '�, •�c'� �F ' .• ,– .:s � ' y
I--�--� ----- — n �;� f�. v�, � -�0„ �. � . :�r y . J. "� • St
�,�_ i _ � ,:. � ' "' o.. �i ' y ' �s . ,"•' t � J`-
r r �•-.. � ='S � - ti s � �'
O } 3 �� , 'r � � z s,' r J-"� �, :--u
Z . W.~�" � � c f B_ ' �M •� 3�, �i
�I I! 2��i _ � i �, S s�
� I ;�. + ' -- ` 6 � . .. W ;` o'
; � � s"� �. + � r .«. � '_ r r 0 � • � � .
H �•,, , I` �..�... , � y ' .
i � ,. `A 'y �' 1 ' - f • �., � ....ar = ` a • " - . �� . f,
ur
�� � _ � °f I � • ' • y �.�• � , , . ' . '. . ' � �r ; r � W° • e
a ��� �� , f i �. c j � � �� � � • H � � � � � 3 , 2 a ' � � � ; i i < � • j � ; i c j � 3 0 ' .. �� � J �
I M�— I� � ` �.� '� � 67 AVE. N.E. • � . ` . -
iQ � ; : ,. .. � • . . . > : � •, . r ., • � . . ' . � . • . . � �
I ' 6' �
�j; ' � z � j _ s � _ ��3 � j .c i ai� ,3 � • e �. � �O� � � C � � q s 5 � s j � � '? � � � q
� .. ,,,' '�- • � R � • F • .... �"' _ �
w �'/���Ci -� � � ��Zt� e� �E 2� �' • i s) e s• � S t MENtp i
, � � ,� '.j� 'I •i • ,i' y UU c � ' x
� �n66TM °AVE. N.E. : r" �� 3 wr. I 4L�:': o.. .. >. t� �
�, �, I✓ w ,• r r • I • r r � r , s •r, '� � �`4 p YES r jC�o �
, �4 - a 3� LA� �. � " �. q �� . R,��p _� r----- .
, _ , ,. " _" , ': 4 � . .. . �` �-^ _ "' - 1 • s._�,�.�,, . .. 1 _.
� •� /� iµ�9 . R El� 3� z' � �„ E�R�C � KL~ P�A�'� -' ..�
� � I ! ¢ � j � f / ..•1•`�.;'n�•. s� n
I I �r
. �� • � G[wieRq �
�� SLC •
�� 13
24 ��7�
LOCATION MAP
�' ` : �'� r`` -
.> ; � • *� , .`��
'� .� ` � �� � � �� �
.
.,.. '. .-:� 3 `�� ������F
, �P. '.."""T
P r �;s�� s, ..
` � �4 A j ��'' -.
, �
� �� ,�� , � � .
, " ." ,� s�
"•'� �, _ ,1 � �#, �{ t. ` �<°
, -� �` "� '�,,�. `Q .- r F •.
r
„ '
i y,� _ .
/ • " ' 11yR .
v`T"�ri^n'° t . •. �� ..�i ! -i
Z F �,�r � , � �� .
�r L `v"�✓y�r
'*�� +�� �� �'�' `� •i.r-.� �
s� � F��
� ..r a
i��� 1�. '-: ' � Q IiU �i� • . �
�..i . � � ' �.
• }... I �` 1
.�_�._:���`� 4.,
*.�___.� �; � __ �.
t ��, .
� r
�" i �. � '. F. . . � ,!' .. T � � � :�. '
� �itl�� ' M* t �
� �i
¢ ��.,i .�� ti.- i � - .. � \
., � � .u7 . � �, ��"!ti ., �
� . . _� .- �
.. �` , yy�-,�Y . , y ��� .� ��
L ': � "";
� � '; A �
. t�Yti�. .�a - i ; .
S '
� �� .��
>���_r, -:�, � �
•.��11,� d'..
r�,-�S. `�• �_.r'� 11.���� �,�
.
:s � �,'yy.
� _. _ _ � r..w�.. a. . y .
..,w�-t:.�+. �'7� �'n'rir.r,'r�.�.� .,�..' '
. (�Y 'a[',�
. .. . :R. . � .
_�,.�... . .
ry'nswle•��/s+1���i�. . .
ib' �
. £T ,��4•� Y�+W ,r�IV s.s. �NV�����pI.w�i.cM,�f.1.`�� � m^�af�yy.�����,
' i - -»+�NY. !R,U� �rr��-Yi�li�68'�.iol�_.�W�+d
... .^�c�. s+rc.:e'�a VFr�-arr<.
...._r. _.•. ..� ..�....� ��. ... .. _ . . . _ .
Cd'bq�OrJel�
��� � '` ��
:"�,,,,� ��� c �+ir� . .`�►'�`,; �,7�""�+R'�`�
�Id Jtl� � r
� ` ,•
f� � S�`:_ ' �'�-�-� .
«� ` ,.{�.� di . �
�� � - �?.
.; �� v►�' � *_
j '� t .� � .
�;=�i l'` � � � ..:_...
.:,. � ,�
;���� . , - -.
�� .���� ` . .. � � :,��._� f;+'�
� �: : �.
{i` ��`'i� '� � ` �"�,
. r�ft�c � ',r ��;;
1F , ��
.F .,_ � ,�. � :
�, � i� . � •y � ' #.
r �`� '�'� , �
�r .! �� ...r�l.�~� �� ��� t
, __--- ��_ .
� • • .^..,...
• �*s�� x�ai� �u .a a � .,._.
f_ _.'w . .. . . .. �.
r_
,� �� ��-. . j
-. t'd i.. cf � :fi-+rA '�� '��'� � �.�
� . a `i{,{i4� .. : .
� < � i�`'
t! +� �s #
�. Lt°a �-S' �.':. • �`�
� �_:.� �,r -
s �
. ' � •�'+� ) .^� ♦ ^ � � .�i
i. � p�t� � � }••�r ..s}` ._� : �
, t- ,. �� �� �.
, � �.. ! ' ;
' � � '� } ._'; a �'t . �u � [�
�R .r � `
rt �
1 : ' �s: ��'„ R S`�` _ `+ .;
. �`�rt`��, ; . � � �'
� � � ���, �=�-�
-.�sT R �� A-•� .,
. .: 1' ' . ' •�. . . ,. : . . . - . _ � '. .
♦
� �•� �
. 1 '�:. � �} � '� R � ' i� I � ; .
�'' � -. y �' `�' . c � �, � f���� � j',•� �`� -°►- �\�� } `� �� . � r r���F�
� �"'��, � ` � � t- � �
., �., .�. � f " � . ,
., `, .p :
x � ��. ,�,,' � tiE t ; ' � '� . . , .
�'•� t �r- � . M *la.�'� _ . ��sr. _ _ �ff Ff E ' �y �;, F �, _-,, �, .
Y4 1'
��;°..��,�Y�
� ~� ���
a �
�' �
� � ♦ . , t .. '+' .. . y�. � .
` • �. � � r,E �. . �.' i• r � � _f � ��� ���
�� ��C E.� F �n.t� �; � � _rr�c„� �
_ �•\ .: .r . � �! , ; r.:�� 1M�,
�. `l \ • � ,� ,�; i.F; A f i; t' . - _ _.• ► ;y,,x � �,..
� ;\ '+� +� � F ' r t ; �' �� • ' �`
'., a�'' . .. � ��^�� 1�� '� r "� ,
�jT ��:f�
��� , F ` . F'F,t. � . � �, '" n.t . '�% ..
\ d �, F . � ..�-'' ' " 9 �.
� � 9� � r �� +� ... `' .
.� '1 . � ��� � • . �� S � •• _ �iK '7 � `...�,�t.- ..
, O T �'�� � .. Y}
•v � f �f `\'�� _�� p''"�1�.�.� f � ...
t'�t-.�y� -� `✓,�`." - � � � '� �F ~'• Y ,
� : t. 'I. � ',�:�• . �'� ��
Ys � `� � 'T.•.? , y; �. y ��♦r•�
- r` •4...z • � �,ti �� .v��;7��i_,�
.� . �� �j' ti' � (4 _ � .,. ^'�^i�.
�� �
� - �+w�: .�r.r�,�� .r �:
r ! '
�� �. 'I
� ��� .!. ,. - � ' .
�� ' . . • ! .� y. `. 2�..�
es- : � E
=f? �� !� � �
.s � � E
$�f < < %LY .1' �3'. �
i � � p � � � � ' �_ �
i7
4 ■ s t s �i� i�s= �i'� �� �
• ��6s e; 3� �F a� �-;c �= se
I!j�`sw �.�o���l! E ! �iy�e �:l:5�:5E? �;E
� a � . ���
�EiI:Ei �Q`E�Eii�i: �§S
S 1 i! 1 2 ■�� i i 7 i= i ;`_ � _= i
• • C O = ♦ O . a • j � � • � • � r � t � £� ;
i " ��� � 1 }ji
L'[ 1R i�� .!� �t �C
'zs! �s"�= ���: w..� -p
ca :3�x :"-= ";:�- i� �!
� =s t • " €;: .fe= :° i�
's-y 3aisc EL - s: -
: o��! 3c"s22 �g.-_ 34�e_ ii es
z--s—� �
.
�
, i � . ..
�' i ! I
—I � I � i
� � ��:�
�
�
�
i
s
� �I
, �
b
�� �
� I
_� �
: l�
�
_�
�
ZOA 1�90-02
U.C.D.
i '_; � �
� 3�:: �. �
- S�j �' i
: t.,s E� a
r f�== �: �
! '� j :S •
j t :
C �'�� �� j
�_ ��i' �j
i 3� zi:� e� _�
c :� rir- � :a = •'
*�� i�:i i i� 5 ii
_ r� i ir
e
i
�
z �-'��'�— ��
� e�
II ' •
1`� �,G�i �� � I
j •'i � � � � (
"�°°' ' 3
:
_.`� .
-.� ` �3 i
��j�f
�zit�
■1 S Y
��Ij�E .
:3
�s�j-E � Fi
l��f # �i
�i�'!� 7 jl
��:} •S
�:�j�� � �I!
t's�sl � �ti�
�
�
iY �f���
�1 E
�.
�z
� T
W
>
¢
N
Y
<
O
�
�o
m
t
i3
�E
� �.
tc-•
it�
I`s=
Y�
a-
� �.
i! � �
-.�
=i:
. ;,
r
2y
�F
w�
<S
>�
e�
>'a
3'
��
f
��
0
_
:
.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
�
�
�
I
I
I �I � ; I
� ''� i � ��
I �+r � —
� W �I �� 3� „
I ��i � �
---1 W �I � ! m
�
IQI'�� ^'
I �I � �
�--}}+r
� �� � i
1 �I � � �
� �� � i
� � � 1
I �I � ; �
�—L + � o
j� T � ^ �°v
x II � � � ��
_ � �; o
QF-�•1
� � � d
u ,
i �� i W
� � I � 6
J� i a
I I�I� °
�I 1 � N
� I� � ��!� Y � �
� II �{o M N � I N
:�
y o
il _�' I � - �m N
� � + � v+ "' =
i� � �
II �• N
II��� N ► ►� N
�
-- '
I �
.
.
' - — - — - — - — - — - — -
_-__- �N yf1N�/�H A I TC?
ZOA ��90-02
�
� :�
�.
� I) 1
I �, 1
� 5I �
"s �' �
. �I y
I� ,
1 I� i
I II I
���--
I �I I
I i
I� I
I �I I
I
,�¢� I
_� II � W
r�, I w
� ��1 � �
I �! i N
� �� �
Itt��
I �� T__
I. I
IYI I
, �j� I
� t I ��x �a: .�. .0
I �� I
��' I
� rl—�— — -
� I� ' �
1 1
� I �
I � �
� i N
1 N
3 , N
I I �
I I �
@=� �
�:a:
����
�
.
�
!��
(��
:;
`$�
�E
��
s�
T�
sx
:+
_E
W
aW�
�_�
o �;
N
Z �»
�y�
>�N
Wu�
J � _
Q��
oc
�
1
�
�
0
�
SITE PLAN
F
d
S�?i�
9g����
°z :��s�i
W ������
w ; o �
J � RG
z
i
i
I
I
T
�
t
i i) � �
i i � �
� F.1 �
IW�I��i
I Z �� � i�
--J W II � � ;
� al� � � �
� � i
1
I �' I �
1�
� I �
� I� � i
I �I � �`.
I I� t t
' �
' I I �
I =�' � 1
� � �I � 1
:��� ��
� ' j i
�._�T�
� �� �
I � j �
�
1 �� I �-
I II r �
� �� � i
�_t+,
�
�
,
i� i �
i� i',�°
--��
t
z
i �
� • -----
� ----------------
------*'`� 3N 3f1N3/�ti �lIS�3�INf1
-- ---------------------------------------- `------
�
i ii 1
1� �
ZOA I�90-02
U.C.D.
0
9
�
I�
,I �
a
F , �—
�
; � t� �
; � �i ;
�� � e � .
�� �
,� _ , , i
� '�
a--.I �
L , „ �--
� i � I
i
i I �� I
i I � I
� i {; I
� � T� I
,
� � � i
�
r — �-1 � !
I II I
I I I
� � � �
�'��'
' I ' � � � �
I ; I
I�I I
� I1� 1
T I�'T`_.—
I � � 1 �
� I I I
i i r'-i— — -
� I�l, 1
�� �
'� I I
I � �
� I I
� ,.
i i �
. � �
. . .
� i i
� i i
� "_
i
1G
.,__
,�
0
iii
�J �
�
!
r� �
�i�
;� a
te�e
tit'
�i2 j
:E
b-
i'w
.£ .
Ve�
I.�I
,'S;S
�:FS
1 ��
�i�! ��
P
r
t
�
s
�
1
u
ji�
0
IA�N
J
1 t G
QT�
~ � N
HN
W u .�.
J>
Z
°�.
n
4
{'
f
�
`t_
R�
:�
DRAINAGE PLAN
I 'II �
I �
I
I � ��
I Z �I
W �
--1
i Q i�
i �
r- �,
I ��i
i i,
I �II
� _ �i
' I
) _"
W �
.) �
1 ��
� ��i �
� ��i �
:� ��
2_�1
i�
t�
�II
– – 1L
ZOA �� 90-02
������
��;E���
��������
oa.o.• �
�
�
,--
�,
�
�
�
Z `�- �
r
I' �I �
; i i � 3
�; �
� i xl a
„ .
n j �� i
�i b u •
� > .i
.� I i� i
i I 1 �
' I II
' I
' i �t---
I
� � �� I
i
� � i� i
i��� i
t � �I i ►-
�-r�, i w
i �'I I Q'
� I I �
ir i
�L__
� �� I
> I
� �i �
4' .t I� ��.a u u� a
I �
i� � �' �
i i rl-i---
II � �� � i
�� i � i
i �
a
� � s �
tt i � N
� � � N
i , , N
� � �
I I ; �
1--� �- - —
! i �
� i �
.
ii��
�i�
�
=��
r�_
i'
�
�=s
� _
i�s
t �
' ` �'�
W
�
o���
N���
W��
z .
3isi
s.
oF=`
�N
J>=�
o��`
�
�
r
1
�
0
�
r
UTILITY PLAN
H
e
i���1, �. �'�� �i_.
��E � i z �. �� � t ��
_ �t! ! � !� � :�� � i �� �
� � W
( �
• � � �
_ ��y �
. .... - uWi
, � �
�
�_ ! 4� � �e
: � <
. �
W
O
O
Z
H
2
J
d
O
a
x
w
ZOA ��90-02
U.C.D.
� :•�
i
t
/
I Ij t
i �� _
i� �
't ±, � � Q; I f, ; ; �
; ` �_ � � : _:� � ,, �
, , , ,
4:� : � � i , , , , r i;; � '' �
� :i ; � � � r-� � � ��; �' ;
i t . ! j ' � �, f i ;: _ � � , � — - :
i � � - —�-- � i �_--
'� ' I
I �- � - I i '
��,� I � �" - —._ 'i
• -- I � ; 1 ii' � ., '
i m
i�
� �� i���� --�— 4� Y. I �� ��' ,
— +i , � �--- ' , ,
i i� - � _ '- �;; �'q; i
i i � �;� �
� �� i��, — f, I I` I
� � � � ��! _ � �'� �?; I
� �� I� I _ - T— =T I i �, ,
I_ - I' t �� - — '� a , � ' � I
1 �� � � -_ . '__"— \ !� � � _.__'
• ; , f ' --- �_' - --- � i' � .
� �� �1 � 1 I / - .__ __ ___ __. 1 1 � •
� •.� ', � �m,.�I• + ,- — � � �.� �, � I � I �
1� , _ ; '
� ' � `pF / --- ` --T' `�Z � `�e�►�P_�.'�w.�.—
� �7"� H � — __..__ \ • ; �i� I
I I � � i. � -- -- Q \' ' ' I � � -
II 1 � __ � �'y �I � � _I_ _
I Ii � �1� I, �/ '_ —` - . �� � � � � �I '.i%� (
'� r{o � i --- - «_ �� . I � y � I
i I _ __ +'��.
� ' i i �4 _�_ �, � �, �
�� � � -- ` .r _ ''1 �,, ; � i� •
_ _I'l: -- �� ��I� ;
7 ; ; , ; � � I i
ii i��. - - f, �� � y'� Q �� � �j�'= � 1
�
i �° . �� � �
. , � '� �
- - �. � ' � r- - -- ---- � _ — - "_ —__.�' ..� ° i
� , \ `7 �
----- '-.� -.-- �r,; :-�r.i3,\': � _:-��±.i'`-�--- ---- --j-�; ;'-- }-�---
— - - =►_ � i
�
r�
�._
;�,
��;
:r
�:
.- �
�!
Fij
�
��
�!
�
I� I
���i
�
s
r�
t�
s t,
��i
��i
�E�
W
Q �.i r
� = W
���N
yN
Z
o�s
n
~�'N
NN
I Wu=
oJ>
��
o`c
�
1
�
f
�
�
,
LANDSCAPE PLAN
�_,�:;:� : <
�gp��Y� 3 �
U � � Y= �
YSw2��E�"3 �
�
o i<-� 3� ��` W
c.al'�s •uu� Y
.��.,�� 0������
T
��
ZOA I�90-02
U.�.D. 1J
EL��VATION
�
�
c�nroF
F� ��
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
COl1llMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPART1VlENT
MEM4RANDUM
June 14, 1990
r�William Burns, City Manager�
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
SU&TECT: Second and Final Reading for the Sale of Excess
Property; East Six Feet of a Vacated Alley, by
Wayne Johnson
At the June 4, 1990 meeting, the City Council tabled final action
on this item so that the two property owners which are not
participating in the proceeding subsequent with Wayne Johnson could
be notified about the current status of the east six feet of the
vacated alley. Attached are the letters that were sent to these
two property owners. Mr. Curry contacted me on Wednesday,,7une 13,
1990 and I confirmed with him the information that was contained
in the letter. Staff recomraends the City Council approve the
attached ordinance for second and final reading.
BD/dn
M-90-423
�
2A
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE DNDER BLCTION 12.06 OF THE CITY
CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAI+ ESTATE TO BE
BIIRPLUB AND AIITHORIZIN6 THE SALE THEREOF
SECTION l. The City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract
of land within the City of Fridley, Anoka County,
State of Minnesota, described as follows:
The east half of that part of the vacated alley
which adjoins Lots 5 through 9, Block 5, Hyde Park,
lying north of the south line of said Lot 9,
extended westerly and south of the north line of
said Lot 5, extended westerly according to the plat
thereof on file and of record in the office of the
County Recorder in and for Anoka County, Minnesota.
All lying in Section 23, T-30, R-24, City of
Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota.
SECTION 2. Zt is hereby determined by the City Council that the
City no longer has any reason to continue to own
said property, and the City Council is hereby
authorized to sell or enter into a contract to sell
said property.
SECTION 3. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to
sign the necessary contracts and deeds to affect the
sale of the above-described real estate.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1990.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: August 14, 1989
First Reading May 21, 1990
Second Reading:
Publication:
�
_
C�N �F
FRIDLEY
r� -;
FRiDLEY ML`NICIPAL CENTER • 6-131 UN3VERSITY AVE. Iv.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FA� 161'_► 571-I'_K7
June il, 1990
David Curry
5125 East Twin Lake Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55429
Dear Mr. Curry:
It is my understanding that you do not wish to participate in the
"proceeding subsequent" alonq with Wayne Johnson to memorialize
your Torrens certificate. As you are aware, the City has passed
an ordinance vacating the alley to the rear of your property. The
west 6 feet of the alley has accrued to your property. The east
6 feet is now in the City's ownership, as we have received the deed
from the State of Minnesota.
Should you decide to sell your property in the future, conveyance
would not include the east 6 feet of the alley, since it will be
in the City's ownership. If you wish to acquire it at some future
time, you will need to contact my office to begin those
proceedings. Please note that should the City decide to utilize
this portion of the alley, any structures or improvements within
the City's 6 feet may need to be removed. The cost to replace or
relocate such improvements will be at your expense.
The portion of the alley abutting the Johnson's, Henrickson's, and
Early's property will be conveyed to them in the near future. The
City Council will be adopting an ordinance for second and final
reading on June 18, 1990 authorizing this conveyance.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Barbara Dacy
Planning Coordinator
cc: William Burns
Gregg Herrick
C-90-336
�
�
CtTYOF
FRiDLEY
2V
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1'_87
sune 8, 1990
Jerry Dold
6110 Star Lane N.E.
Fridley, IrIN 55432
Dear Mr. Dold:
It is my understanding that you do not wish to participate in the
"proceeding subsequent" along with Wayne Johnson to memorialize
your Torrens certificate. As you are aware, the City has passed
an ordinance vacating the alley to the rear of your property. The
west 6 feet of the alley has accrued to your property. The east
6 feet is now in the City's ownership, as we have received the deed
from the State of Minnesota.
Should you decide to sell your property in the future, conveyance
would not include the east 6 feet of the alley, since it will be
in the City's ownership. If you wish to acquire it at some future
time, you will need to contact my office to begin those
proceedings. Please note that should the City decide to utilize
this portion of the alley, any structures or improvements within
the City's 6 feet may need to be removed. The cost to rep2ace or
relocate such improvements will be at your expense.
The portion of the alley abutting the Johnson's, Henrickson's, and
Early's property will be conveyed to them in the near future. The
City Council will be adopting an ordinance for second and final
reading on June 18, 1990 authorizing this conveyance.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Barbara Dacy
Planning Coordinator
cc: William Burns
Gregg Herrick
C-90-336
�
�
cinr oF
F�a�
DATE:
TO:
C0�1/LMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'
DEPART'MENT
MEMORANDUM
June 14, 1990
William Burns, City Manager��
FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Second and Final Reading of an Ordinance
Approving a Request for a Vacation, SAV #90-
01, by the Michael Servetus Unitarian Society,
Attached is the above-referenced ordinance. The City Council
approved the first reading of the ordinance at the June 4, 1990
meeting. Given that the final plat approval for the Michael
Servetus 2nd Addition is also scheduled for approval on this
agenda, staff recommends the City Council approve for second and
final reading the attached ordinance vacating Oakley Drive.
BD/dn
M-90-418
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE IINDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY
CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALL8Y8 AND TO
AMEND APPENDI% C OF THE CITY CODB
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. To vacate that part of Oakley Drive as dedicated in
the plat of Michael Servetus Addition.
Al1 lying in the North Half of Section 13, T-30, R-
24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota.
SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with
Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of
the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code
shall be so amended.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1990
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: May 21, 1990
First Reading: June 4, 1990
Second Reading:
Publication:
3A
�
�
cinroF
F� ��
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
COlV1MUNi^fY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
M EMO R.AN D UM
June 15, 1990
William Burns, City Manager� �
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
SUBJECT: First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a
Rezoning, ZOA #90-02, Fridley Town Square
Associates
Attached is the ordinance for the above-referenced rezoning. Staff
recommends the City Council approve the ordinance for first
reading, subject to the following stipulations:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The development shall be constructed in accordance with site
plan dated March 8, 1990, as represented in ZOA #90-02.
The landscaping plan shall be revised to include:
a. six American Lindens along the north lot line;
b.
c.
Honey Locust trees shall be replaced by Hackberry trees;
Annabel Hydrangea species shall be replaced with rosa
rugose.
The petitioner shall pay park dedication fees prior to
issuance of the building permit.
Storm water management calculations shall be submitted prior
to issuance of the building permit.
All rooftop equipment shall be screened from view from the
public right-of-ways.
The petitioner shall obtain development contract approval from
the HRA.
The petitioner shall execute a maintenance agreement for the
landscaping and parking areas.
0
Fridley Town Square; 1st Readinq
June 15, 1990
Page 2
4A
8. No automotive service uses, car sales, or other outdoor
repair/display uses shall be permitted.
9. The City shall have the right to review each use within the
center to determine whether or not it is consistent with the
intent of the Center City Redevelopment Plan.
10. The site plan shall be revised to provide one 18 foot entrance
lane and two 12 foot exit lanes.
11. Shared parking and access easements shall be provided on the
property for LRT kiss-and-ride traffic, and specifically along
the east and south lot lines.
i2. All lighting shall be shielded such that the glare does not
adversely affect residential properties.
13. All parking and driving areas shall be lined with concrete
curb.
14. All dumpsters shall be screened in accordance with the City's
ordinance.
15. Underground irrigation shall be provided to landscaped areas.
16. A comprehensive sign plan for free-standing and wall signs
shall be submitted for review and approval by the City
Council.
BD/dn
M-90-427
. �
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY
OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN
ZONING DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows:
SECTION l. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended
as hereinafter indicated.
Be and is hereby rezoned subject to stipulations
adopted at the City Council meeting of ,
1990.
SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the
City of Fridley and described as:
Lot 9, Block 2, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 1 from R-1,
Single Family Dwelling, to S-2, Redevelopment
District, the same being 355 Mississippi Street
N.E.; and
Lot 12, Block 3, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 2 from R-
1, Single Family Dwelling, to S-2, Redevelopment
District, the same being 368 - 66th Avenue N.E. ; and
Lots 10, 11 and 12, Block 2, Rice Creek Terrace Plat
1, except the South 30 feet thereof, according to
the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in
the office of the County Recorder, Anoka County,
Minnesota, and Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, Block 3, Rice
Creek Terrace Plat 2, according to the recorded plat
thereof one file and of record in the office of the
County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, from R-1,
Single Family Dwelling, and C-1, Local Business, to
S-2, Redevelopment District, the same being 6525
University Avenue N.E.
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District S-
2 (Redevelopment District).
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change
the official zoning map to show said tracts or areas
to be rezoned from Zoned District R-1 (Single Family
Dwelling) and C-1 (Local Business) to S-2
(Redevelopment District).
Ordinance No.
Page 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1990.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: June 4, 1990
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
�1�
5
CITY OF FRIDL$Y
M L M O R A N D O M
r�
TO: BILL BURNB, CITY MANAGER �
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCS DIRECTOR
SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION MODIFYING WATER RATES
DATE: JIINE 13, 1990
The attached resolution will have the effect of increasing the
water rates for the City of Fridley. The process has been a long
one in regard to the discussions that have previously taken place.
As you will recall, the process started out with the need for
additional construction and repairs necessary for providing proper
supplies of water to the property owners of Fridley. These
improvements were outlined in the Capital Improvement Program
provided by the Engineering Department. These costs were then used
to prepare projections of expenses necessary in the production of
water.
The City Council reviewed approximately 35 different versions of
water rates and decided on a two tier rate structure. This
structure will allow for a volume discount for the large users that
consume over 5,000,000 gallons per quarter.
The water rate that Council will be taking formal action on
provides for:
0- 5, 000, 000 gallons to be priced at . 60/1000 gallons
over - 5, 000, 000 gallons to be priced at . 55/1000 gallons
The city engaged the firm of Springstead Inc. to provide the
projections of income from various rate scenarios. The past three
years history of water sales were used as a basis for revenue
projections. In each rate scenario, two assumptions were made.
The first was that the rate to be established would be effective
for approximately a five year period. The second was that the
operation itself was to only break even during the five years and
was strictly to recover the cost of producing the water.
The revenue assumptions provided for the rate increase to become
effective July 1, 1990. The billing system does not allow us to
bill customers using different pricing structures during the same
quarter, so the first bill with the new water rates will appear in
October.
With this brief summary of events, I provide the attached
Resolution for Council consideration.
RDP/me
5A
REBpLUrIQd I�D. - 1990
I•�s_ • � r •�� �� � t '�1• "�, Y:,�' v• Y: �:r� r.:
Wt�',AS, Sectioaz 402.13 of the City Code provides that the City Cour�cil shall
have authority to set water rates by re^.�olutioa�, and
WF�RFAS, the City Cair�cil i�ad ind.icated a desire to provide for major
it�ravements to the water ger�satiryg /filtration systeqn, arri
Wf�tEAS, these ia�rovanents have been outlined in th�e City's 5-Year C.�pital
I�rave�nent Progx'an►. ar�d
Wf�tF'AS, these oosts of improv�nerits aust be oa�er�sated �ax�i the rate
stnructure cl�arged to the watex' c�, at�d
WF�ftEAS, the City C;a�u�cil has reoanm�er�ded that th,e rat� structure be si�lified
by reducinq the rnm�ber of vol�une lev�el rates fraa six levels to tw�, ar�d
Wf�E'.AS, the rates are to be effective with the October 1 billiriq.
NOW, Z�RE, B� IT RE50LUID, that the followirg water rate schedule for all
custo�rers exoept those qualifying for the law inoane senior citizen ar�d disabled
citizen rate shall be as follcyws:
J� Y�: :: 4 .r.l�li_i���i
0- 5, 000, 000 $. 60/1, 000 Gal./M3nim.uu $7. 20
OVII2 - 5,000,000 $.55/1,000 Gal.
BE IT FUKI3�2 RESOLUED, that the City �il hereby provides a reduced rate
schedule for qualifyir�g law ir�oare senior citizens and disabled citizens as
follaws:
`���1 • : yYM �► ./_ Y�I: :: M �.I�I�. �
0 - 5,000,000 $.40/1,000 Gal./Min�1[�nm $4.80
The followiryg criteria nn�.st be met in order to qualify for the law inc� senior
C1t122ri Y"dt2:
1. The senior citizens must occ��y si.r�gle family or dauble b�angalaw
units. 'I3ie senior citizen rate does nat apply to apar�merits,
o�rcial, ir�dustrial, institutional,or athex.
2. �e custa�x or peL�son having responsibil.ity for payment of the water
ci�arge naust be sixty-two years of age or older and moust provic�e a
c�y of a valid Minnesata Driver's Licen.se or ieceipt thereof, or
a Minnesata Identificati� Card or a receipt the.reof with current
address for proof of ac�e.
Resolutiaa�► No. - 1990
Page 2
3. 'Ihe persoiz mu.st oertify that the adjusted gros.s ir�ne is less than
the law ir�oane level defined by the Depart�xYt of Hausir�g arid Urban
Develc�nent by providir�g a vq7y of the past year's Federal 1040 Tax
Form.
'Iiye follawir�q criteria mu.st be met in ordex to qualify for the laa inoame
disabled citizen rate:
1. Disabled citizens must pravide a capy of an award letter frcm th�e
Social Security Ac�ministration indicating that the individual is
or�e hur�x�ed peroent (100t) disabled.
2. �he person must opstify that the adjusted gn�ss ir�ocrne is less than
the low irxz�ne level defiried by th�e Deparbment Hausing at�d Urban
Develagne.rit by providing a c�o�7y of the past year's Federal 1040 Tax
Form.
PASSID AND ADOPI� BY Zi� GTI'Y �7[JNCIL OF Zi� C'ITY OF FRIDLEY ZfIIS DAY OF
, 1990.
WII�SAM J. NEE - Ng1YOR
iVy4�•�I�A
I�' /� • M M �I'
5B
THE MINIITES OF TH8 REGIILAR MEETIN(3 OF T8E FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL OF
JUNE 4, 1990
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:37 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
�LEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Billings, Councilman
Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and
Councilwoman Jorgenson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
AFPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING. MAY 21. 1990:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Mayor Nee requested the following item be added: (3.1)
Consideration of Commission Appointments.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above
addition. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
MARY VASECKA - LOCKE LAKE ASSOCIATION:
Ms. Vasecka, 6909 Hickory Drive, extended thanks to John Flora for
his efforts and communication regarding the Locke Lake problems.
She stated that she understands soil borings will take place in the
next few weeks. She questioned if any other progress has been made
that the residents should be aware of.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that work is continuing
with the City Attorney to draft a petition to present to the Rice
Creek Watershed District. He stated that there is a Chapter 112,
a watershed 509 Plan, and a new 601 Plan that affect the storm
water improvement projects. He stated, hopefully, there would be
additional information to present to the Council by the June 18
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIIN$ 4, 1990 PAGE 2
meeting. He stated that he would continue to keep the residents
informed, as Locke Lake is one of the City's high priority
projects.
Mr. Flora stated that as plans are developed the sedimentation
issue will be addressed and a�determination made if it is
marketable. He stated that in regard to the detention pond, it is
hoped that the City can work with the District Engineers to
incorporate it into their plans.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that he has done some research
on the problem and it must be recognized that the project can be
completed if there are enough funds to pay for it. He stated that
he is trying to figure out how this can be accomplished in the most
efficient way and what the administrative and legal complexities
involve. He stated that there are some procedures in Chapter 112
involving special assessments and appraisals of damages, but this
is very slow and very expensive.
Mr. Herrick stated that he is attempting to determine sources of
funding in addition to the money the homeowners and the City will
pay. He stated that this involves other governmental agencies
which, in itself, are slow and sometimes complex. He stated that
Chapters 112 and 473 include the original 509 Plan which has been
modified by the 601 Plan, and in addition, there is reference to
Chapters 106 and 429. He stated that to determine how these
provisions interrelate is complex. He stated that more time was
needed to research this material and to contact the attorney for
the Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated that, hopefully, he
would have a written report for the Council at their next meeting.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, felt this process would move very slowly
as the City is not in control of all the variables. He stated that
there are a lot of agencies involved and that some funds have been
set aside for at least the initial phase of the project.
Ms. Vasecka stated that she realizes it is a slow process, but the
Locke Lake Association just wants to make sure the improvements are
completed this time.
CONNIE METCALF - WEED PROBLEM AT MOORE LAKE:
Ms. Metcalf, 860 West Moore Lake Drive, stated the residents living
on Moore Lake are concerned about the weed problem. She submitted
a sample of the weed she had removed from the lake and stated the
entire lake is full of it. She stated these weeds are visible from
Hiqhway 65 and produce a green scum. Ms. Metcalf stated she felt
that this detracts from the lake and Fridley's image, as Highway
65 is heavily traveled. She asked that the City consider steps to
correct this problem. She stated that other residents living on
the lake are also concerned and that she would be willing to have
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 3
a meeting regarding the problem. She stated that there is also
another weed with a purple flower that is spreading along the east
side of the island.
Councilman Schneider asked that staff identify the weed and submit
a report on the west basin of Moore Lake.
SCOTT LUND - '49ER DAYS:
Mr. Scott Lund thanked aZl the Fridley organizations involved in
the '49er Day Celebration on June 13 - 17, 1990. He invited the
Council and all the residents to participate in the activities
during this celebration.
PUBLIC HEARINGS•
1. REZONING ZOA #90-02 BY FRIDLEY TOWN SOUARE ASSOCIATES, TO
�2EZONE THREE SEPARATE PARCELS AS FOLLOWS:
LOT 9 BLOCK 2 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1 FROM R-1. SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING TO S-2 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, THE SAME
BEING 355 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E. AND.
LOT 12 BLOCK 3 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2 FROM R-1. SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING TO S-2, REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,THE SAME BEING
368 - 66TH AVENUE N.E. AND,
LOTS 10 11 AND 12. BLOCK 2 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1. EXCEPT
THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT
THEREOF ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA AND LOTS 13. 14. 15 AND 16.
BLOCK 3 RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2 ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED
PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER ANOKA COUNTY MINNESOTA FROM R-1. SINGLE FAMILY
DWELLING AND C-1, LOCAL BUSINESS TO S-2,_ REDEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT THE SAME BEING 6525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N�:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
opened at 7:58 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this rezoning is
requested to allow development at the northeast corner of Highway
47 (University Avenue) and Mississippi Street. She stated the
developers have completed a similar development in the City of
Minneapolis known as Calhoun Village. She stated that there are
two petitions that were received by the Planning Commission and a
third petition from various business owners in the vicinity of this
intersection. She stated that the developer held two neighborhood
meetings.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL M8$�ING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 4
Ms. Dacy stated that the properties to be rezoned include the
10,000 Auto Parts site as well as single family homes. She stated
that the zoning proposed is S-2 which is comparable with a PUD
District where the City approves or disapproves the rezoning based
on a particular plan or proposal.
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated that the
Center City.Plan was adopted in 1979 by the iiRA and City Council.
He stated that this plan included the Holly Center, the Target
Northern Operations Building, the Fridley Plaza Office Building and
Clinic, and the parking ramp. He stated that the 10,000 Auto Parts
site has been a part of this plan and called for a commercial
development or mixed uses.
Mr. Robertson stated that when the HRA first considered the
project, 10,000 Auto Parts was still a viable company. He stated
that with their demise, it was feasible to return to the original
concept of financing on a pay-as-you-go basis. He stated the
developer would need an extra $100,000 for the carrying costs for
the pay off of that grant; therefore, the grant would be in the
neighborhood of $300,000 for five years or up to $315,000 for six
years, depending on the interest rate of the loan at the time of
closing.
Mr. Robertson stated that the HRA considered this request at their
April 18, 1990 meeting and gave conceptual approval to the
financing and site plan subject to the neighborhood compatibility
and traffic conditions. He stated that the present commercial
building, the four vacant residential lots to the north, and the
two developed residential lots to the east generate approximately
$17,000 to $18,000 in taxes. He stated that with this proposed
development, a minimum of about $84,000 would be paid in taxes.
That amounts to a substantial increase in tax revenue to the City
and will be available to the school district and the county when
the tax increment district is de-certified.
Ms. Dacy presented the site plan and stated that the proposal is
for a 28, 000 square foot retail facility, one story in height, with
a masonry rock face exterior. She stated that not all the typical
setbacks have been met that are required in a commercial zone.
She stated that the setback on University Avenue is 30 feet instead
of 35 feet, and along Mississippi and 66th Avenue the setback is
15 feet. She stated that the parking setback is only 15 feet
instead of 20 fept.
Ms. Dacy stated that the developer has proposed an extensive
screening plan to construct a six foot masonry wall along the north
lot line abutting 66th Avenue and on the east lot line. She stated
that staff recommends the planting of additional trees along the
north lot line.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAQE 5
Ms. Dacy stated that, in regard to the Light Rail Transit (LRT)
issue, Mr. Yantos has sent a letter regarding this particular
proposal. She stated that, basically, it states that if this
development is constructed and the LRT is also located along this
route, Anoka County recommends University Avenue be the major
feeder route and a major pickup at this site. She stated that this
would also act as a bus feeder site for dropping off passengers to
use the LRT.system.
Ms. Dacy stated that it was requested that the City reserve an
easement and, if a park-and-ride system is necessary, the County
could consider acquisition of the eiqht homes between 66th and 67th
Avenues for a park-and-ride lot. She stated this would necessitate
expansion of the driveway along the east side.
Ms. Dacy presented a video of the developers' other business center
in Minneapolis, Calhoun Village, and pointed out the building
materials that were used.
Ms. Dacy also presented a video of the traffic on Mississippi
Street between 5th Street and University Avenue that was taken
between 3:30 and 4:30 p.m. last Friday, June 1. She stated that
she did not observe any stacking of the vehicles past the 10,000
Auto Parts site. Ms. Dacy stated that the majority of the
eastbound traffic on Mississippi Street is in the right hand lane
and tends to move over to the left hand lane. She felt that this
should not be a problem as there would be adequate time to make
this lane change. She stated that during this hour of filming, six
pedestrians were walking along Mississippi Street, but no one
crossed the street. She stated that there were also a number of
bicyclists along the north side of Mississippi Street. Ms. Dacy
stated the developers' plan is to move the driveway farther to the
east.
Mr. Dave Koski, Traffic Consultant with Barton-Aschman, stated that
a traffic study was conducted for the intersection of Mississippi
Street and University Avenue as well as 5th Street and Mississippi
Street. He stated that this was compared to a 1987 traffic count
conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. He stated
that, basically, the traffic volumes at the intersection have not
changed much between 1987 and now. He stated that they also
conducted an analysis of how the proposed development would affect
the traffic.
Mr. Koski stated that Barton-Aschman has been actively engaged in
surveying traffic generated by all types and sizes of developments
and utilizes a combination of their observed traffic generations,
as we11 as that produced by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, in
determining the amount of traffic this development would generate.
He stated that for a development of this type the peak retail
period is occurring during the peak traffic hours. He stated that
this is attributed to the fact that a lot of people are combining
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETINd OF JIINE 4� 1990 PAG$ 6
a shopping trip with the time they come home from work. He stated
that the peak traffic is between 4:30 and 5:30 at University Avenue
and Mississippi Street. Mr. Roski stated that a significant amount
of traffic, about 50 percent, going into this shopping center is
already traveling on the street, but he assumed for this study that
the traffic generated was all new.traffic. �
Mr. Koski stated that, basically, they calculated the capacity of
the University/Mississippi intersection as it is today with
existing traffic, considered the new proposed configuration by the
County, and added the additional traffic for the shopping center.
He stated it was found that the intersection operates at a D level
of service. He stated that this scale is based on A being perfect
and F as failing. He stated that D is considered to be an
acceptable level of service in an urban area. He also stated that
if nothing was changed at the intersection and the improvements
were installed, the intersection would operate at a D+ or very
close to a C. Mr. Koski stated that it is felt that this shopping
center would not change the capacity of traffic generated at this
intersection. He stated that the primary reason for the level D
service at this intersection is on the west side. He stated that
the signal needs re-timing and re-phrasing.
Mr. Koski stated that they reviewed the impact of left turns for
vehicles eastbound on Mississippi Street and for left turns into
the site. He stated that there are sufficient gaps in the
�' Mississippi Street westbound traffic to accommodate the demand to
turn left into the shopping center. He stated that there is
capacity available and the left turn would not have any significant
impact on the traffic on Mississippi Street. Mr. Koski stated that
the primary delay would be for traffic exiting the shopping center
to go eastbound on Mississippi Street but felt there would only be
a backup of several cars.
Mr. Koski stated that the impact the shopping center may have on
5th Street and Mississippi Street was not significant. He stated
that on a very conservative approach and assuming all the traffic
generated by the shopping center was new traffic, there would not
be a significant impact on the University/Mississippi and 5th
Street/Mississippi intersections.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of
this rezoning request. She stated that some of the members of the
Commission felt that because the site plan did not meet all the
setbacks, it was not appropriate. The majority of the members felt
that with the potential that some of this area would be used as an
LRT park-and-ride, they would prefer the site be used as such
rather than for this proposed development.
Ms. Dacy stated that staff's recommendation is for approval of the
rezoning with several stipulations.
�RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JUNB 4, 1990 PAGE 7
Mr. Bob Guzy, attorney for the developers, stated that the
developers have been working with City staff and the HRA on their
plans for this development. He stated that he felt this was a good
project and that it would be another step in the City accomplishing
their goals for the property. He stated that the revitalization
of HolZy Center has benefitted the City and, with this development,
there would be three quadrants that would create the "halo" effect
and increase the development potential for the southwest quadrant.
Mr. Guzy stated that wherever there is redevelopment there are
potential conflicts. He stated that he wanted to ensure the
Council and neighborhood that the developer, Urban Commercial
Developers, and their anchor tenar►t, Walgreen's, will be a good
neighbor and a qood corporate citizen. He stated that the Council
has to look at what is there now and what will happen when the
development is completed. He stated that the neighbors have talked
about this site being an eyesore. Mr. Guzy stated that the
developers worked with staff to have a pleasing development for the
neighbors and to provide the essential buffer. He stated that
there will be no funneling of traffic into the residential area and
that the flow of traffic is onto Mississippi Street.
Mr. Guzy stated that part of the site is already commercial and
that Council made a decision that this be a vital intersection in
the City. He stated that the development would also add to the tax
base which affects all citizens of Fridley. He stated that the
developers are working with the City to put this property back on
the tax rolls. He stated that Council has the option of making
this into a parking lot or making it a viable retail center that
can provide funds and other benefits to the citizens.
Mr. Guzy stated that it is essential to utilize the two houses and
existing vacant land that abuts 66th Avenue in order to make the
project feasible. He noted that a petition was received from
businesses in the area and stated that in Columbia Heights there
is a Snyder's and a Walqreen's within a block of each other and
both and doing good business.
Mr. Guzy stated that he is aware that the Planning Commission is
concerned about the LRT issue. He stated that, in the future,
there probably will be an LRT system on University Avenue.
However, the question is if this would in any way prevent this
project from proceeding. He stated that the bird in hand theory
should not be diverted because of something in the future that
could, potentially, occur. He stated that this project fits well
with the City's plans, adds to the tax base, and creates jobs. He
stated that it would not diminish retail competition but instead
increase it.
Mr. Reese, the Project Architect, presented a drawing of the
proposed site plan. He_stated that the construction materials are
�RIDL$Y CITY COONCIL MEETINa OF JIIN$ 4. 1990 PAGE 8
pre-finished masonry units with a metal roof over the front canopy.
He stated that the building is designed to fit in with the
neighborhood.
Mr. Schuette, UCD, stated that the center would be a 28,000 square
foot neighborhood convenience center. He stated that there is a
demand in Fridley for additional retailers who want to bring new
concepts and ideas to the City. He stated that the anchor tenant
would be Walgreen's, utilizing 11,000 square feet of the space,
with six or seven other shops that would total 17,000 square feet.
He stated that, for a comparison, Holly Center is about 75,000
square feet.
Mr. Schuette stated that this center would not bring anyone from
across town to Fridley. He stated that it is designed for
neighborhood use and that it may contain such stores as an
insurance office, hair salon, video store, Chinese restaurant, etc.
Mr. Schuette reviewed the site plan and stated that the center
would be entered by one driveway on the east.of the site.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked the location of Walgreen's loading
dock. Mr. Schuette stated that it is along the east side of the
building.
Councilwoman Jorgenson questioned the width of the road. Mr.
Schuette stated that it is 23 feet.
Ms. Dacy stated on that the on the west side of the building it is
20 feet.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked about snow removal for this site. Mr.
Schuette stated that their plans are to have the snow removed from
the site.
Councilman Schneider asked the approximate value of the center
after it is constructed.
Mr. Schuette stated that construction costs, including costs of the
plan are over $2,000,000, and the perceived value when the center
is finished is over $3,000,000.
Councilman Schneider stated that he felt the Planning Commission
recommendation was strongly influenced by the LRT issue. He asked
Mr. Yantos, from a practical and realistic viewpoint, what would
be the earliest LRT would be in operation.
Mr. Yantos, representing the Anoka County Regional Railroad
Authority, stated that the earliest would probably be about seven
years.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGB 9
Councilman Schneider asked how soon a decision would be made on the
kiss-and-ride at this location.
Mr. Yantos stated that a station is being planned for Mississippi
Street and University Avenue.
Councilman Schneider stated that there are some options for
additional parking, but this may require the acquisition of homes.
He questioned when this decision would be made.
Mr. Yantos stated that the decision would be made between now and
when construction begins five or six years from now. He stated
that the homes to the north of this site would seriously be
considered for parking.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked why a park-and-ride was not being
considered at the Columbia Arena site.
Mr. Yantos stated that in looking at station space and movement of
people they are trying to keep the stations approximately one mile
apart. He stated that they are also considering the east/west
access which is important. He stated that it is very expensive
and it really does not make sense to construct a station and to
have one kiss-and-ride with another just a short distance to the
north. Mr. Yantos stated all of the stations, at least north of
37th Avenue, would be park-and-ride.
Councilman Schneider asked if kiss-and-ride was not in the planning
at this time.
Mr. Yantos stated that it is in the plan but, as the planning
continues, the need for park-and-ride will certainly be there.
Mayor Nee stated that this is a surprise.
Mr. Yantos stated that as they continue to work with the various
communities they did not want to say they were only going to have
a kiss-and-ride or drop-off for buses and cars as the potential
for park-and-ride is very strong.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many park-and-rides were planned
for Fridley.
Mr. Yantos stated three: one at 57th Avenue, one at Mississippi
Street, and one at Osborne Road.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how much land is needed for these
sites.
Mr. Yantos stated that enough space to accommodate 200 to 300 cars
or about a two to three acre site at each of these intersections.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAQE 10
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the property would be owned by the
City or the County.
Mr. Yantos stated that it would be owned by the Railroad Authority.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if it would be tax exempt. Mr. Yantos
stated that he assumed it would be tax exempt.
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if a route has been established south
of I-694. Mr. Yantos stated that this has not, as yet, been set.
Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Yantos what has led to the change
in plans.
Mr. Yantos stated that, as various committees have been meeting and
focusing on the needs, the ridership is being reviewed, and one
concern is to remove traf f ic from the City streets . He stated that
they did not want people parking in front of homes on residential
streets. He also stated that the committees have become more
serious about park-and-ride.
Councilman Billings stated that he finds it very enlightening to
be hearing this information since he was not aware of it, and he
is the Council's representative to the Anoka County Regional
Railroad Authority.
Mr. Yantos stated that they have reviewed this site in the
northeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue and
worked with the developers to provide space for a kiss-and-ride
along with an easement for potential parking to the north.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many stations would be required
as LRT proceeds south.
Mr. Yantos stated that stations would be located at 53rd, 49th,
44th, and 40th Avenues, and St. Anthony Boulevard.
Councilwoman asked if these would be park-and-ride facilities or
kiss-and-ride. Mr. Yantos stated that they would be park-and-ride.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that Mr. Yantos is talking about
major development areas in the City that would be turned into tax
exempt property for park-and-ride areas.
Mr. Yantos stated that they have thought about having parking
beneath office and retail buildings. He stated that there are
other alternatives to use the space beneath the office and retail
buildings other than just for parking.
Councilman Schneider stated that residents in the neighborhood are
concerned about traffic. He asked if this was being taken into
consideration with park-and-ride.
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MBBTING OF JIIN$ 4. 1990 PAGE il
Mr. Doug Moore, Associate with BRW, stated that the parking volume
would depend on the size of the particular park-and-ride lot. He
stated park-and-ride traffic would still use the entrance into the
site. However, it would have to be widened and the Railroad
Authority consider acquisition of additional property as well.
Councilman Schneider asked if.any bf these homes were for sale, if
the Railroad Authority would consider purchasing them.
Mr. Yantos stated that he did not believe they would consider any
purchases within the next six months. However, if property was
available at the 10, 000 Auto Parts site and it did not conflict
with the City's goals, the Railroad Authority probably would
consider purchasing it.
Councilman Billings stated that two weeks ago there was discussion
about the possibility of constructing a station on the southeast
corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, asked if any thought has been given for
ingress and egress off University Avenue for this future site.
Councilman Billings stated that throughout the planning process it
has been his understanding that the Railroad Authority was going
to look at a bus and passenger drop-off at this particular
location. He stated that once the LRT system was in operation the
additional 25 spaces along University Avenue may be needed. He
stated if, in the future, it was found that the ridership has
increased, then at that time a determination would be made as to
the need for additional parking.
Mr. Erickson, UCD, stated that this is what he had heard from Mr.
Yantos. He stated, basically, the Railroad Authority was going to
establish a station and, if and when parking would be needed,
would be determined by the demand. He stated that as of now, they
have no way to determine whether parking would or would not be
required.
Councilman Billings stated that even though he serves on an
intergovernmental agency committee, it appears the committee is
serving no function other than for someone to be able to say the
City had input. He stated that it seems the decisions are made
elsewhere and the committee is nothing more than a sham. He stated
that he gets more fed up all the time. He stated that, recently,
the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and Transportation Board
decided to begin a bus service for Anoka County except for Columbia
Heights and Fridley. He stated that maybe it is time Fridley went
back to Ramsey County.
Councilman Billings stated that he is totally shocked to get this
far in the planning process encouraging the developer to work with
the Railroad Authority and then find they have now changed their
FRIDL$Y CITY COUNCIL ME$TINa OF JIINB 4. 1990 PAGE 12
philosophy of thinkinq. He stated that he doubted if this project
would have gone this far if the City had been qiven this
information six months ago.
Mr. Bill Hogan, 365 Mississippi Street, stated that the driveway
to this shopping center site is, in reality, being moved only about
80 feet east. He stated that with the improvements to the
intersection the center median will be located just below the
Marsolek property.
Ms. Dacy stated that the existing most easterly driveway is being
moved approximately 80 feet to the east, but from the University
Avenue curb line, it would be about 360 feet to increase the
reaction time. She stated that with the improvement of the
intersection there would be dedicated stacking lanes into the
shopping center site.
Mr. Hogan stated that the original improvement plan for that
intersection did not provide left turn lanes because there was no
development on this site.
Ms. Dacy stated that when the improvement plans were first
completed for the intersection, the redevelopment of this site was
not contemplated and the County was to locate the median just short
of the existing driveway of this site. She stated that with this
development proposal there is an advantage to moving the access
farther to the east and provide a left turn lane into the site.
Mr. Hogan stated that adjustments have been made on the north side
of the shopping center to allow more landscaping, but he was
concerned about the amount of space on the east side of the
development. He stated that most of the drawings do not show the
homes next to the proposed wall. However, the wall would be only
13 to 14 feet from his home. He felt that there was not room for
landscaping, and if the road was widened for a park and ride lot,
he assumed the wall would be located closer to his home.
Councilman Billings asked Mr. Hogan what he felt would be a good
use of this site.
Mr. Hogan stated that he had not given it much thought but has
usually thought about some kind of commercial development. He
stated this proposed development moves closer to his home.
Mr. Thayer, 377 - 66th Avenue, stated that he was opposed ta the
rezoning. He stated that he believed the site is too small even
with acquisition of the two residential lots. He stated that the
setbacks would be less than what is normally allowed for this type
of development. He stated that another concern is snow storage,
and he believed it would be several days before the area could be
used if there is a heavy snowfall. Mr. Thayer felt that the single
combined entrance and exit is a dfsaster, and those who want to
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 13
proceed eastbound will have a problem exiting. He stated that he
believed this would begin destruction of the neighborhood through
the domino theory.
Mr. Thayer stated that he felt a mistake was made when the existing
construction was allowed on this site, and he did not b�elieve the
shopping center is the best use of this property. He stated that
he believed development in the southwest corner of University
Avenue and Mississippi Street and the 100 Twin property should be
completed before this site. He stated that Mississippi Street is
the main east/west thoroughfare and deliberately addinq traffic
without a well thought-out plan would be a terrible mistake. He
felt that if the City has any long-range plans, they should let the
residents know so they can make their plans accordingly.
Councilman Billings stated that he is confused as to how this
dev.elopment impacts the southwest quadrant or the 100 Twin site.
Mr. Thayer stated that the "halo" effect would spill over into the
southwest corner. He stated that his personal reaction is that if
the southwest quadrant is completed it would probably remove this
site as a location for this type of shopping center. He felt that
something much more viable could be constructed on this site.
Councilman Billings asked Mr. Thayer what he would envision for
this site.
Mr. Thayer stated that his basis for saying it is not a good
development is because it is so restrictive in size. He stated
that this shopping center would only be located on a little over
two acres. He felt that if the size was doubled a viable shopping
center could be constructed with better access and sufficient
shops. He felt that some type of multi-story building should be
considered and a determination made as to what is the best possible
use of the land.
Councilman Schneider asked if Mr. Thayer felt a multi-story
building should be retail or housing.
Mr. Thayer stated that there are multi-story buildinqs where the
first level is all parking and felt this would also meet the LRT
needs if it becomes a reality. He stated that the rest of the
space could be used for different offices.
Mayor Nee stated that it is very difficult for the City to spell
out exactly what they want on a site and then have it completed.
He stated that the market usually dictates what a developer or
those financing a project want to construct. He stated that this
proposal for the site is the most realistic one that as far as he
has seen it is being responsive to the City's concerns.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCZL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 14
Mr. Thayer asked if the developer would still proceed with this
project if he was not provided with any of the incentives.
Mayor Nee felt that no one would remove the existing building
without some incentive. He stated that there has been absolutely
no investment in that structure since it was constructed.
Mr. Thayer asked if the development would improve the quality of
life for adjacent residents.
Councilwoman Jorgenson felt that it would, to some degree, and
believed it would also benefit the senior citizens living on the
east side of University Avenue.
Mayor Nee did not believe that there would be any adverse effects
for those living further down the block. However, he stated the
people immediately across the street may feel uncomfortable with
the wall. He also stated that he views the existing building as
almost a cancer and the economics are such that no one is going to
invest in it. He stated that he is convinced there will not be a
park-and-ride at this site.
Mr. Thayer stated that his problem is to make sure that what is
constructed on this site is the best for him. He expressed
disapproval when the existing building was constructed, he also
stated that he did not want this to happen again.
Ms. Louise Bennethum, 368 - 66th Avenue, stated that they have
lived in their home for over thirty years, and this is the best
proposal they have seen. She stated that when Red Owl was a tenant
of the building, it was not pleasant to live next door as they had
rats, noise, smells, etc. She stated that she constantly worried
about a fire in the field because it was not mowed. She also felt
that the situation would only get worse unless the Council approved
this rezoning. Ms. Bennethum felt that the development would
provide a much needed improvement over what is now existing on the
site.
Councilman Billings asked Ms. Bennethum if her property was one
that was being acquired to which she answered in the affirmative.
Ms. Terry Mau, 7343 Hayes Street, stated that as a homeowner and
business owner in Fridley she would like nothing more than to see
the southwest corner develop. She stated that she can sympathize
with the owners of the property because they do not want to make
improvements when there is uncertainty and talk of redevelopment.
She felt that homes should be constructed on this site as it is not
a qood area for a business. Ms. Mau stated that the area is small,
and this center would be a large development for this site. She
stated that the parking allowed for employees is not sufficient as
they have more parking.availab2e,at their Rice Plaza Center, and
there still is a parking problem.
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGB 15
Councilman Billiags asked if the southwest quadrant was redeveloped
where Ms. Mau would consider moving her business.
Ms. Mau stated that she hoped any redevelopment would allow her to
relocate in the same area.
Councilman Billings stated that he was surprised that business
owners located in Rice Plaza-submitted a petition as he felt the
development of this site may allow them to relocate to this site
which would be in the same vicinity.
Ms. Mau stated that she felt there is a problem with access to this
site. She stated that Rice Plaza has two entrances and exits where
there is not a worse traffic situation in Fridley.
Ms. Brenda Tibbets, 421 Mississippi Street, stated that they have
a problem entering and exiting their driveway. She felt that the
senior citizens would also have problems crossing Mississippi
Street. She stated that the existing building is an eyesore but
felt the shopping center was too large for the site, and the
parking would not be adequate. She questioned why improvements
could not be made to the existing building rather than acquiring
people's homes.
Ms. Marilyn Sullivan, 522 - 66th Avenue, stated that she agrees
with the decision of the Planning Commission to table the rezoning
at this time. She felt that the LRT issue needs to be resolved
�- before development occurs on this site. She stated that she did
not feel the neighborhood would benefit from this development. Ms.
Sullivan stated that this site is a prime location for a park-and-
ride for the LRT system. She stated that she did not feel the
traffic studies provided significant details and that they need to
be conducted over several weeks and months. She stated that the
impact on the neighborhood deserves priority, and it seems wrong
to remove homes and erode the neighborhood. Ms. Sullivan felt the
site should be developed to be compatible with park-and-ride. She
suggested that perhaps a day care center or a nursing home should
be developed.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is a moratorium on the
construction of nursing homes. She stated that as far as a day
care center, with the traffic and playground facilities that would
be necessary, this site would not be feasible. She stated that in
regard to the LRT, the Council was told this would be a kiss-and-
ride site, and that people would park at Columbia Arena and be
bussed to this site.
Mr. George Meissner, 373 Mississippi Street, stated that he did
not believe this rezoning would benefit his property. He stated
that it is difficult now to access his home, and the situation
would only qet worse. He believed that if a shopping center is
constructed it would generate � lot of traffic. He stated that,
as it is now, it sometimes takes him five pinutes to get out of his
�RIDL$Y CZTY COQNCIL l�EBTING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAG$ 16
driveway. Mr. Meissner stated that the site is relatively small,
and even Holly Center, which is much larger, has been hurting for
tenants. He felt that the Council also has to take into
consideration the possibility of an LRT system and a park-and-ride
at this location. He stated that he was opposed to the rezoning.
Councilman Billings asked Mr. Meissner why he changed his mind
about the re.zoning since, at one time, he felt the rezoning should
cover an even larger area.
Mr. Meissner stated that nothing has changed his mind. He stated
that the area is quite small and, if there is going to be
development, the area needs to be larger.
Mayor Nee questioned the effect of a park-and-ride lot on that
site.
Mr. Koski stated that when they conducted their study, the LRT
issue was discussed with Mr. Yantos and Mr. Moore. He stated,
however, there was not a conclusion on the amount of parking or
type of traffic. He stated that they reviewed the park-and-ride
situation and the parking that might occur for the bus system. He
stated it seems that the amount of parking adjacent to Mississippi
Street and University Avenue would not have that much impact. Mr.
Koski stated that with a park-and-ride the primary activity occurs
at different hours than the shopping center's business. He stated
that the primary exit for park-and-ride would be between 5:00 and
6: 00 p.m. , and the shoppinq center would not be open in the morning
hours when park-and-ride would have its heaviest use. He stated
that the entryjexit roadway would certainly have to be improved to
the extent that it was wide enough to accommodate the extra
traffic.
Mr. Grant Olson, 390 - 67th Avenue, stated that there are a lot of
vacancies now for retail space and that most of the traffic using
Mississippi Street comes from 7th Street, which was not included
in the traffic counts.
Mayor Nee stated that as far as vacant retail space the City does
not control who builds, but that it is the judgment of the
developers and the ones providing the financial backing.
Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Olson makes a very valid
point. He stated that with the 100 Twin site the City had
wonderful proposals, but nothing has materialized. He stated that
it appears with this development that there are committed tenants
for this shopping center.
Ms. Patricia Anderson, 3667 - 66th Avenue, stated that she was
opposed to this development because of the LRT issue. She stated
that if one does or does not support the development the
�tIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGB 17
possibility of removing homes on 66th and 67th Avenues is something
she cannot accept. She stated that to remove homes in an area that
is not blighted is not acceptable.
Councilman Billinqs stated that he had several concerns. He stated
that he did not receive the traffic study from Barton-Aschman until
this evening which did not allow him adequate time for review. He
also stated that as he has been following this development project,
he was under the assumption that a station for LRT would possibly
be located on this corner. He stated, however, the intent was a
bus point and passenger drop-off, and he now understands they need
a parking lot immediately. He stated that he would like further
clarification on the Railroad Authority's thoughts.
Councilman Billings stated that as recently as two weeks ago, the
Railroad Authority was investigating if the LRT station could be
on the southeast corner of University Avenue and Mississippi
Street. He stated that one of the reasons they are looking at this
northeast corner is because it is a recommendation of the City's
Planning Commission. He stated that if they had not recommended
this site the Railroad Authority probably would still have been
considering Columbia Arena. He stated that he is sometimes
confused as to the Planning Commission's direction. He stated that
this site could generate up to $100,000 in property taxes and to
have this be used for LRT boggles his mind.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that it is very difficult to have a
piece of property in limbo for seven to ten years waiting for a
decision on the LRT system.
Mr. Yantos stated that it is a difficult situation because they are
talkinq concepts. He stated that the Railroad Authority has looked
seriously at this northeast corner, and the concept today is to
take 31 parking spots from the south end for a park-and-ride and,
in the future, if more parking is needed they will need to acquire
eight homes to the north. He stated that they also looked at the
possibi2ity for a station in the southeast corner. He stated that
each time they meet new information does evolve. He stated that
the Council will have the opportunity to review the final plans in
four to six months.
Councilwoman Jorgenson's concern was what the City is supposed to
do in the meantime. She felt that development plans could not be
set aside for the sites the Railroad Authority is contemplating to
use as this could seriously impact the City financially.
Mr. Yantos stated that they are aware of this; however, the process
takes a long time. He stated that he can understand the difficulty
in planning, but all they can do is provide information they have
to date.
�RInT$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETINd OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 18
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that none of the corners the Railroad
Authority is contemplating for use of the LRT system is vacant.
She asked if they had considered the impact on the owners of the
land and if they would be relocated.
Mr. Yantos stated that they are reviewinq it but do not have any
concrete answers.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the Council would not review the
plan for six months and then construction would not begin for seven
years. She stated that she was concerned that people would have
to put their properties on hold for this period until the Railroad
Authority makes a decision.
Mr. Yantos stated that planning, development, and change is
happening continuously. He stated that people and public bodies
need to make changes as they see fit. He stated that he is here
to inform them that LRT and park-and-ride is a possibility. He
stated that they have looked at kiss-and-ride as a first stage of
development, but there is also the potential for a park-and-ride.
Councilman Billings stated that he felt he needed clarification on
the Railroad Authority's plans for this location before a decision
can be made on this development proposal. He stated that he
understood the emphasis would be on drop off for the Mississippi
station. However, he seems to be hearing something different.
He stated that he would like this informatian in two weeks.
Mr. Yantos stated that the Railroad Authority did take action on
this piece of property to work with the developer to provide the
easement for a drop off or kiss-and-ride.
Mayor Nee stated that he envisioned a park-and-ride would be in
response to a future demand.
Mr. Yantos stated that he apologized for the misunderstanding, but
he was only trying to provide the long-term picture of what might
happen.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to continue the public hearing on
this rezoning to June 18, 1990. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Billings stated that information would be received from
the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority and, depending on what
information is received, the Council may take additional testimony.
He stated that if there is no new information, the Council could
take action on June 18 or may not take action for another two
weeks. He stated that he did not know what would happen until the
Council receives this information.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JQNE 4. 1990 PAQ$ 19
RECESS:
Mayor Nee called a recess at 11:05 p.m.
RECONVENED•
Mayor Nee reconvened the meeti�g at 11:19 p.m. All Council members
were present.
2. REZONING ZOA �k90-03 BY BOB'S AMOCO TO REZONE LOT 1. BLOCK
1, LAMFERT'S ADDITION FROM M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. TO C-2,
GENERAL BUSINESS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.
1p�MnCO oIL SERVICE STATION):
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman
Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
11:20 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request for
a rezoning in the southwest corner of Osborne Road and Highway 65
from light industrial to commercial. She stated that the Planning
Commission has recommended approval of this rezoning due to the
fact that all four corners of this intersection have become
commercial.
Ms. Dacy stated that in conjunction with this rezoning, the
petitioner has filed for a special use permit and variance. She
stated that the special use permit is to reconstruct the pump
islands in front of the gas station and construct a car wash in
the rear. She stated that the variance for the lot size would not
be needed if the property is rezoned. Ms. Dacy stated that the
other two variances are to reduce the hard surface setback from 20
feet to 10 and 5 feet and reduce the side yard setback from 30 feet
to 4 f eet .
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission and Appeals Commissian
have recommended approval of these requests for the special use
permit and variances with stipulations.
No persons in the audience spoke for or against this proposed
rezoning.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 11:26 p.m.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 20
OLD BUSINESS:
3. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12 06 OF THE CITY
CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND
A�UTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF:
Councilman Billinqs asked if the two property owners to tha north
were contacted in regard to the storage shed.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that they have not been
contacted.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
3.1 CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS:
RESIGNATION - ALEX BARNA:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to accept, with regret, Mr.
Barna's resignation from the Planning Commission. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to nominate Connie Modig for
appointment to the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman
Billings.
There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by
Mayor Nee.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the
appointment of Connie Modig, 1330 Hillcrest Drive, to the at-large
Planning Commission seat for the term which expires April 1, 1993.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMI5SION:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to nominate Susan Price for
appointment to the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick.
There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by
Mayor Nee.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the
appointment of Susan Price, 7449 Melody Drive, to the Environmental
Quality and Energy Commission to the term expiring April 1, 1993.
$RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JtJNE 4. 1990 P�GE 21
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
A��EAIS COMMISSION:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to nominate Catherine Smith for
appointment to the Appeals Commission. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick.
There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by
Mayor Nee.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to cast a unanimous ballot for
the appointment of Catherine Smith, 6548 Clover Place, to the
Appeals Commission to the term expiring April 1, 1991. Seconded
by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
�AN RESOURCES COMMISSION:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to table this appointment.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS•
4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY
16. 1990•
A. �STABLISH PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 18 1990 ON A REZONING, �OA
#90-04, BY THE LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE LODGE 38 TO REZONE THE
�t��i+v o� rLLm n� rnmc � d nrrn 1�_ RRAATC�7TF.W ADDITION, EXCEPT
THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE NORTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND �5.
�ROOKVIEW ADDITION AND ALSO THE SOUTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND
15 BROOKVIEW ADDITION EXCEPT THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE SOUTH
95 FEET FROM R-3 GENERAL MULTIPLE DWELLING TO C-2, GENERAL
BUSINESS GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6875 HIGIiWAY 65 N.E.:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this
rezoning request, ZOA #90-04, for June 18, 1990. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
The Council received the minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting
of May 16, 1990.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF JIINB 4, 1990 PAGE 22
5. $PECIAL USE PERMIT SP #90 03 BY BOB'S AMOCO PER SECTION
,�,05 .14 . O1. C� 6) OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALLOW A MOTOR
VEHICLE WASH ESTABLISHMENT ON LOT 1 BLOCK 1 LAMPERT'S
ADDITION GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N E (AMOCO OIL
sFRVICE STATION):
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and grant special use permit, SP #90-
03, with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall
submit a landscape plan prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit;
(2) approval of the variance request, VAR #90-04; (3) joint
driveway/parking easements shall be recorded against both the Amoco
and the VFW parcels; (4) a grading and drainage plan shall be
submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit; and (5) the
existing mercury light standards shall be replaced with more modern
high pressure sodium standards. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
6. VARIANCE RE UEST. VAR #90-04 BY BOB'S AMOCO. TO REDUCE THE
SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE A DRIVEWAY IS TO BE PROVIDED FROM 30
FEET TO 4 FEET; TO REDUCE THE LOT AREA REOUIRED FOR ONE MAIN
$UILDING ON PLATS RECORDED BEFORE JANUARY 1. 1993, FROM THREE-
FOURTHS L3�4) ACRE (36,679 S4UARE FEET) TO TWO-THIRDS (2/3�
ACRE (29 040 S4UARE FEET): TO REDUCE THE PARKING AND HARD
SURFACE SETBACK FROM ANY STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM 20 FEET TO
�0 FEET AND 5 FEET: TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ATTACHED
CAR WASH AND NEW PUMP LAYOUT ON LOT 1 BLOCK 1 LAMPERT' S
�,DDITION THE SAME BEING 7680 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that staff has proposed two
alternatives providing for a different angle on the pumps and a
detached car wash facility. She stated that the Appeals Commission
was convinced it would be better to approve the variance. She
stated that staff is recommending the variance be denied as there
are other alternatives.
Councilman Schneider asked if staff was comfortable with the
Appeals Commission's action.
Ms. Dacy stated that the proposal is certainly an improvement as
far as the traffic situation. She stated that the proposal
certainly will not be a detriment.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation
of the Appeals Commission and grant variance request, VAR #90-04,
with the following stipulations: (1) the petitioner shall work
with City staff and the VFW to resolve building code and traffic
issues; (2) approval of the special use permit request; and (3)
approval of the rezoning request. Seconded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF JIINE 4. 1990 PAGE 23
7. �RST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE
�ITY OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA� BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING
DISTRICTS:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the readinq and approve the
ordinance upon first reading subject to approvaZ of the variance
application. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
8. �RS� READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12 07 OF THE CITY
�'H.AI2TER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C
OF THE CITY CODE:
MOTION by Councilmaa Billings to waive the reading and approve the
ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
9. �,tECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR ONONDAGA STREET STORM
SFWER REPAIR PROJECT NO 209:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for
Project No. 209:
Insituform Central, Inc.
6167 North Kent Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53217 $38,801.20
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, alI voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a bid for this
project was received from the sole producer of the insituform
system, Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20. He
stated that $30,000 was allocated, and it is recommended that the
contract be awarded and a transfer of $8,801.20 be authorized from
the Storm Water Utility Fund to Project. No. 209 in order to
complete the project.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider ta award the contract for Project
No. 209 to Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the transfer of
$8,801.20 from the Storm Water Utility Fund to Storm Sewer Repair
Project No. 209. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COII�TCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAGE 24
10. ;�SOLUTION NO. 33 1990 AUTHORIZING REAP�RO�RIATIONS IN THE
�99Q GENERAL D BUpGET TO PROVIDE BENEFITS AND COMPARABLE
�ORTH ADJUSTMENTS FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that this
resolution would authorize a transfer of $37,015 from the emergency
reserve to provide for comparable worth adjustments and benefits
for temporary employees.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 33-1990.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. APPOINTMENT• CITY EMPLOYEE•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick
appointment by the City Manager:
Starting
ame osi io alary
Mark Public
Foster Services
Worker
Mechanic B
Non-exempt
to concur with the following
Starting
Date
$13.50 June 18,
per hour 1990
$28,188.00
per year
Replaces
Robert
Anderson
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
12 . C�►A�MS :
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claims No.
32213 through 32379. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
13 . I,ICENSES :
MOTiON by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted
and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
14. �STIMATE5:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as
submitted:
FRZDLEY CITY COIINCZL MEETING OF JIINE �. 1990 PAGE 25
Herrick & Newman
205 Fridley Plaza Office Bldg.
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Services Rendered as City Attorney
For the Month of May, 1990 . . . . . . . . . $ 3,528.00
E. H. Renner & Sons
15688 Janis Street N.W.
Elk River, MN 55330
Repair and Maintenance
of Well No. 3
Project No. 203
FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,632.00
Gammon Bros., Inc.
13845 Northdale Boulevard
Rogers, MN 55374
Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2
Estimate No. 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,301.08
Secanded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor xee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Billings stated that when he attacked the Anoka County
Board for their adoption of a plan that did not include Fridley and
Coluiabia Heights he wanted to note that Commissioners McCarron and
Kordiak are working to include Fridley and Columbia Heights. He
stated it was the Regional Transit Board that omitted Fridley and
Columbia Heights.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTZON by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motian carried unanimously, and the Regular Meeting
of the Fridley City Council of June 4, 1990 adjourned at 11:43 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
CITY OF FRIDLEY
�
PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, MAY 30, 1990
w...... r wr w...r w.....wwr.►.►^.�w..�.w..r.rwww.rw. w. w. w.w.w....w....w.w.w.w.w.�w w. w.ww. wr�rw.►w..rw. rw�r.r�..�..►w.w...w.w.
CALL TO ORDER•
Vice-Chairperson Kondrick called the May 30, 1990, Planning
Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek,
Paul Dahlberg, Diane Savage
Members Absent: Don Betzold
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Bob Bushey, Sears Outlet Store
Ms. Pat Bozony, 479 - 79th Way N.E.
Doug Erickson, Fridley Focus
APPROVAL OF MAY 16, 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the May
16, 1990, Planning Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOUSLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP
�90-06 BY ROBERT BUSHEY FOR SEARS OUTLET STORE:
Per Section 205.15.1.C.(8) of the Fridley City Code to allow
exterior storage of materials on Lot 1, Block 1, Shorewood
Plaza, generally located at 1000 East Moore Lake Drive N.E.
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Saba, to open the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED LTNANIMOUSLY AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN
AT 7:32.
Ms. McPherson stated this property is located at 1000 East Moore
Lake Drive, at the corner of the intersection of East Moore Lake
Drive and Highway 65. The entire site is zoned C-3, General
Shopping, as is the Northwest Racquet and Swim Club to the east
and the old Shorewood Shopping Center to the north.
. `
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 30, i990 __ PAGE 2
Ms . McPherson stated the special use permit request is to allow the
outside storage of up to five semi-truck trailers at the rear of
the Sears Store. Mr. Robert Bushey, the Sears Outlet Manager, has
indicated to staff that the semi-truck trailers are an integral
part of his day-to-day operation.
Ms. McPherson stated that on October 26, 1989, Mr, Bushey signed
a building permit which stipulated that the trailers be removed on
or before November 17, 1989. Mr. Steven Barg, Code Enforcement
Officer, has been working with Mr. Bushey and Mr. George Applebaum,
owner of the parcel, on the removal of the trailers. Mr. Bushey
was given the option of either removing the trailers or applying
for a special use permit.
Ms. McPherson stated Section 205.15.07.D.(5) of the Fridley Zoning
Code requires that loading areas be screened from the public right-
of-way. As the rear of the Sears building can be seen from the
public right-of-way of Highway 65, the code requires that this area
be screened. However, since this area also serves as a parking
area and a drive-through area for people accessing the site, there
is really no efficient way to screen this loading area from the
public right-of-way. The location and the way the trailers are
arranged on site make it difficult for drivers to negotiate along
the rear of the Sears building.
Ms. McPherson stated another section of the zoning code, Section
205.15.07.D.(10), does allow for the overnight parking of motor
vehicles necessary to the operation of a principle use without
screening if they are not readily visible from a public right-of-
way. Again, this is not the case, because these trailers are very
visible from the public right-of-way; and the code would require
that this area be screened. These trailers are also parked
overnight consistently, not on a temporary basis.
Ms. McPherson stated that in addition to the code noncompliance
situation, the storage of these trailers is inconsistent with the
goals and objectives for Tax Increment District No. 2, within which
this parcel is located. One of the goals of the tax increment
district is "to promote sound land use development procedures,
including area design standards, landscaping, and lighting
standards, architectural review of new developments, and such
standards that may be developed that promte sound land resource
management". The existence of these storage trailers is
inconsistent with the surrounding area, as both the Shorewood
Shopping Center and the Sears building have recently received
facelifts through architectural refinements and outside
improvements. There is also the new shopping center to the east
and the racquetbaZl club which are consistent with the
redevelopment standards for the district. The semi-truck trailers
are a direct contrast; an example of what the redevelopment
district strives to remove through the district's goaZs and
objectives.
�• :
PLP,NNING COMMI88ION MEETING. MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 3
Ms. McPherson stated that because of the high visibility of the
trailers from the pubic right-of-way and Shorewood Inn, the
negative impact on traffic, access, and parking, and no effective
method of screening, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend denial of the special use permit request, SP #90-06, to
the City Council.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that if adequate screening was provided, would
the storage of the semi-truck trailers be an acceptable use on this
site in terms of the special use permit?
Ms. McPherson stated it would be an appropriate use if the loading
area is not seen from the public right-of-way. The other seetions
of the zoning code do require that lc�ading areas be limited to the
side and rear yards of businesses so that they will not be seen
from public right-of-ways.
Ms. Dacy stated staff would also want to seriously evaluate even
the construction of a fence in this area, because they want to
project a certain image and architectural styling in this
particular area. Staff could take the interpretation that a fence
could be just as offensive as the trailers.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that if fencing or screening could be
. accommodated and was acceptable to staff, then, in effect, parking
would be reduced on site. If that happened, wou2d this property
then be in noncompliance in terms of the required number of parking
spaces on site for this use?
Ms. Dacy stated she did not have that information available at this
time. Staff would have to check into that.
Mr. Saba stated this situation is similar to the Holiday Plus
store, and the only thing that separates the two situations is the
fact that the Holiday Plus store is not in a tax increment district
and does not have the special restrictions imposed on this
particular tax increment district.
Ms. Dacy stated that is correct. However, the City is also
evaZuating the potential of a tax increment district along
University Avenue to include the Holiday Plus site. So, the goals
would still be the same.
Ms. Sherek asked that if the area was walled so that the trailers
were not visible from the public right-of-way, is there still
enough space to maneuver vehicles behind there and for vehicles to
drive around the building?
Ms. Dacy stated, yes, there is adequate space to drive around the
building.
sc
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 _ PAGE 4
Mr. Bushey stated the Sears Outlet store has been in Fridley for
20 years. In those 20 years, they have paid over $1/2 million in
taxes. They spent over $700,000 in payroll last year, and a
majority of their employees come from the City of Fridley. This
is one of the most profitable outlet stores in the 121 outlet store
chain. They couldn't do that without the support of the City of
Fridley and the people of Fridley. It has to be a relationship
that works both ways.
Mr. Bushey stated that Sears is going through some tramautic
changes right now. They are evolving from a very strong catalog
base to more retailing and other facets. As they make that change,
there are lot of things involved. The Sears Outlet organization
is liquidating its catalog problems. When he applied for the new
dock facility at the Sears Outlet store, he did it because their
business was growing and with the understanding that in this next
year they probably would not have quite as much merchandise to
liquidate because of the reduction of the catalog business. The
Minneapolis plant where they get most of their business was
supposed to close on January 1, 1990, so when he signed the
building permit in October, it was his feeling at that time that
they would not have any problem in reaching the November deadline
ior the removal of the trailers.
Mr. Bushey stated, however, that in the process, Sears found they
had to get the old merchandise out faster in order to get the new
merchandise in. That caused the Sears outlet store to become
overwhelmed with trailers. He stated that at this time, it does
not look like they will be able to do business without having those
trailers.
Mr. Bushey stated that, in the meantime, Sears is actively looking
at different locations, and one location is the old 100 Twin
property at Highway 65/I-694. More recently, they have been
looking at using the space across the street where the Hardware
Hank store was located until recently. The idea behind that is to
eliminate some of the trailer backup. It costs them money to have
those trailers parked there, but trailers are also a very integral
part of their bttsiness. This space would be used for secondary
retail. They plan to use it for a catalog department and furniture
and appliances. This merchandise would be received at the original
outlet store and then anything that is to go across the street will
be loaded and unloaded, so that trailer will not stay.
Mr. Bushey stated they hope they can work something out. He stated
the trailers do move fairly quickly; however, two trailers are
needed for extra storage and he hoped they can work something out
to keep those two trailers there. He stated they are willing to
do whatever landscaping or fencing that is required.
. �
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 5
Mr. Bushey stated the Sears Outlet store is an important part of
this shopping center. They are working together as a group to make
it a healthy shopping center.
Ms. Sherek stated maybe Sears should consider building some
permanent storage space on site or moving to a larger site.
Mr. Bushey stated they were told by George Applebaum about 1 1/2
years ago that with the advent of the racquet club, they would not
be allowed to put additional selling square feet on this building,
because of the parking spaces required by the City. More recently,
Mr. Applebaum presented a proposal to Sears about adding warehouse
space.
Mr. Dahlberg stated the ratio of parking required for retail floor
area versus storage is so much different that the number of parking
spaces required for storage is going to be signficantly less than
the number of spaces required for retail sales floor. So, if
warehouse space was added onto the store, would that alleviate the
problem of having trailers stored on site, except for the one
coming and going?
Mr. Bushey stated that was a fair and accurate statement.
Mr. Dahlberg asked staff it was possible to add warehouse space
relative to site coverage, parking, etc., for this site.
Ms. Dacy stated that as far as parking spaces, she believed a
warehouse addition is possible.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that with the two trailers, that is 240 sq. ft.
in storage. A 1,000 sq. ft. addition of warehouse-type space could
be constructed at a fairly reasonable cost.
Mr. Dahlberg asked if Mr. Bushey had discussed this situation with
Shorewood Inn, and was there any objection to the trailers parked
there?
Mr. Bushey stated he could talk to them, but he thought any
problems could be worked out.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that if it is possible to put an addition onto
the building to alleviate the need for the trailers parked on site,
then that should be pursued.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTTNG AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLP,RED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIG HEARING CLOSED AT 8:15
P.M.
6E
PLANNING COMMZSSION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 _ PAGE 6
Mr. Saba stated they are looking at a situation that has been
created by the development district, and he did not think it is
fair to force the Sears Outlet store out of business because of a
development plan created by the City. Right now those trailers are
essential to the Sears Outlet business. He thought the Planning
Commission should be patient in any action they recommend in giving
Mr. Bushey time to look at a warehouse plan and to see the effect
of the expanded retail space across the street.
Ms. Savage stated that, on the other hand, Mr. Bushey knew that the
trailers were supposed to be removed by November 1989 and was put
on notice that if he couldn't, he should be considering some other
alternatives.
Mr. Saba stated he works in an industry that changes monthly. They
spend a lot of money on plans and make decisions with the best
information available at the time, and that is what Mr. Bushey did.
He did not think Mr. Bushey is storing these trailers out of
malice. Sears has been a good neighbor and a good merchant in the
City of Fridley for a long time.
Ms. Savage stated she agreed, but it just seems that Sears should
be looking at alternatives, rather than assuming they will be
allowed to keep the trailers. And, there does appear to be some
alternatives.
Ms. Sherek stated she agreed with Mr. Saba. Mr. Bushey has moved
trailers off site, and he has tried to lease additional retail
space. She agreed that she did not like to look at those trailers;
but, on the other hand, there are a lot of worse spots in the City
of Fridley. She asked if there is a way to grant a temporary
special use permit.
Ms. Dacy stated that if the Planning Commission recommends approval
of the special use permit, she would recommend that there be
specific timetables for accomplishments; or maybe this request
should be tabled until Mr. Bushey has an opportunity to look into
the possibility of a building addition.
Ms. Sherek stated she would like to see a proposal by Sears of what
is needed after the additional retail site across the street is
open and operating. She would definitely rather see a plan for an
addition for continued storage than the continued warehousing of
items in the trailers; and she would rather have those trailers sit
there another 3-6 months short-term while some long-term solution
is being discussed, than to put up fences for screening. She did
not think a fence is the answer to the situation, particularly when
dealing with truck trailers.
Mr. Dahlberg stated he would like the petitioner to discuss with
City staff the possibilities of an addition on this site taking
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 7
into account the lot area coverage allowable, parking requirements,
etc.
Mr. Bushey stated he is willing to pursue whatever they need to do.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to table consideration
of special use permit request, SP #90-06, by Robert Bushey for
Sears Outlet Store until July 25, 1990, in order to give the
petitioner time to come up with a new site plan or other
alternatives.
IIPON A VOZCE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY.
2. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT, L S #90-02 BY MILAN BOZONY:
To split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in order to create
the following two parcels:
East Parcel: Lot 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all
of Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota,
except for the South 25 feet thereof for 79th Way N.E., and
Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly
10 feet, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with
the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview
Heights, Anoka, Minnnesota.
West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5 and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot
2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the
Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview
Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota.
Al1 generally located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:25
P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner owns not only Lot 2, Block N,
Riverview Heights, but also the three adjacent lots to the east and
the three adjacent lots to the west of Lot 2. The site is zoned
R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the north, east,
and west. Riverview Heights Park is located to the south.
Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Bozony is proposing tc
of Lot 2 and combine it with Lots 3, 4, and 5 of
one buildable lot. The remaining 15 feet will b�
1 of Block N, Riverview Heights, and also Lots
Springbrook Park.
split off 10 feet
Block N, to create
:combined with Lot
1 and 2, Block 1,
sF
PLANNING COMMZSSION MEETING. MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 8
Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Bozony is proposing to relocate a single
family dwelling unit that was constructed by the Fridley High
School students to the new lot to the west of his current dwelling
unit. The two proposed lots meet all the requirements for lot
size, lot width, and access to a public street. There are
utilities available for the new dwelling unit.
Ms. McPherson stated a portion of the westerly lot is crossed by
the flood fringe line that is designated by the National Flood
Insurance Program. The lot would then be governed, not only by R-
1 district regulations, but also by the O-1, Overlay District,
regulations, for construction within a flood plain.
Ms. McPherson stated the zoning code contains four provisions in
order for a subdivision to be approved in a flood plain area. In
this instance, the two lots will meet all these provisions:
1. No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by
the City of Fridley for reason of flooding, inadequate
drainage, water supply, or sewer treatment facilities.
2. All lots within the flood plain districts shall contain
a building site at or above the Regulatory Food
Protection Datus.
3. All subdivisions shall have water and sewer disposal
facilities that comply with the provisions of this
Chapter and have road access both to the subdivision and
to the individual building sites no lower than two (2)
feet below the Regulatory Flood Protection Datum.
4. All subdivisions in the flood plain district shall
satisfy the requirements of this Chapter. The City shall
evaluate the subdivision in accordance with procedures
established in this district.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner's surveyor has plotted the 823
foot contour, the elevation at which residences need to be built
at or above in order to be constructed within the flood plain. As
proposed, this contour does not fall within the area where the
dwelling is to be located.
Ms. McPherson stated that because the lot split creates lots which
conform to the zoning and subdivision codes and because the
subdivision meets the flood plain district criteria, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
lot split as proposed to the City Council with the following
recommendations (stipulation #1 in the staff report no longer
applies, and staff is recommending a new stipulation #1):
1. The first habitable floor elevation of the proposed
dwelling unit shall be constructed at an elevation of
6G
�6H
pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 9
824 feet or greater to ensure that the first floor is not
within the flood fringe.
2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
3. The petitioner shall apply for a moving and building
permit prior to placing the house on the property.
Ms. Patricia Bozony stated her husband was called away from the
meeting, and she is representing the petition. She stated they
want to go forward with this and are willing to do whatever the
City recommends. She stated they are very excited about putting
a house built by Fridley High School students on this lot.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City
Council approval of lot split request, L.S. #90-02, by Milan
Bozony, to split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in order to
create the following two parcels:
East Parcel: Lot 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all
of Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota,
except for the South 25 feet thereof for 79th Way N.E., and
Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly
10 feet, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with
- the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview
Heights, Anoka, Minnnesota.
West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5 and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot
2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the
Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview
Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota.
All generally located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E.
This lot split request is subject to the following stipulations:
1. The lowest habitable floor shall be constructed at an
elevation of 824 feet above sea level or higher to ensure
that the first floor is not within the flood fringe.
2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
3. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and
building permit prior to placing the house on the
property.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERBON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
si
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 10
Ms. McPherson stated this item will go before the City Council on
June 18, 1990.
3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SECTION 205.17.03.0
(THE M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT), AND SECTION
205.18.03.0 (THE M-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) OF THE
FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ADDING THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE
REGARDING LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS:
(4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased
up to a maximum of ten percent ( l0� ) of the permitted lot
area with a special use permit. In addition to the
requirements of this Section and the factors indentified
in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the
City shall consider the following factors in determining
the effect of the increase in lot coverage.
(a) For existing developed properties, the total amount
of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated
to determine whether a reduction in the total
building and parking coverage can be achieved.
(b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance
requirements are met, including, but not limited to,
parking, storm water management, and landscaping.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:45 P.M.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission's recommendation on the
lot coverage amendment was discussed by City Council, and the
Council decided they wanted to only amend the industrial districts
and require a special use permit to enable either existing
developed property or a developer of a new industrial property to
petition for an increase in lot coverage up to a maximum of 10� of
the lot coverage ratio. The Council asked staff to prepare two
standards to help the City evaluate special use permits. Staff did
that and developed Standard (a), that if a developer is going to
be proposing an increase of up to 10$, staff will take a tatal look
at the site and determine whether or not they can achieve an
overall net reduction in hard surface areas. Standard (b) came
from a reiteration of the existing ordinance requirements.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that as was amply stated by Councilmember Steve
Bilings at one of the Planning Commission meetings when this was
discussed, this may not be as originally recommended by the
Planning Commisison, but it is at least a start in terms of looking
at appropriate sites and developments in the City that potentially
6J
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 11
could be better served if a greater area of lot coverage is
allowed.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:55
P.M.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City
Council approval of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light
Industrial Zoning District), and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2,
Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance,
adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements:
(4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased
up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the permitted lot
area with a special use permit. In addition to the
requirements of this 5ection and the factors indentified
in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the
City shall consider the following factors in determining
the effect of the increase in lot coverage.
(a) For existing developed properties, the total amount
of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated
to determine whether a reduction in the total
building and parking coverage can be achieved.
(b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance
requirements are met, including, but not limited to,
parking, storm water management, and landscaping.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY.
4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING
SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT NINE FOOT
WIDE PARKING STALLS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND TO REQUIRE
PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED:
1. DEFINITIONS
205.03.55. Parking Stall
A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1)
automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and
permits ingress and egress of an automobile. Parking stalls mav
be nine (9 L feet in width for uses specified elsewhere in this
code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length
may be reduced to eigYiteen (18) feet. Parking stalls shall be
6K
PLANNINQ COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 12
striped in accordance with the design on file in the office of the
City Engineer.
1. R-3 District
205.09.07.A.(3) Parking stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width.
2. M-1 DistriCt
205.17.05.D.(13) Parking stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for
manufacturing uses warehouse and storage uses sneculative
industrial buildings and parkina lots for lonQ term emplovee
parkinQ.
3. M-2 District
205.18.05.D.S13) ParKl.ng stalls mav Ae nine 17, ��C� 111 W�u��. t��
manufacturing uses warehouse and storage uses speculative
industrial buildings and parkina lots for lona term emplovee
parkina.
4. 8-2 DistriCt
205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Al1 performance standards for uses in this district shall be
comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other
districts. Parkina space sizes mav be reduced to nine (9) feet in
MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
DPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:53
P.M.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission recommended that the
parking stall width be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the
City Council preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet
only for long term employee parking, industrial uses, and for
multiple family developments. The City Council also recommended
that all parking spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be double
striped.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission might want to consider
additional language to the R-3 district to limit the width of the
parking stalls to only multiple family developments to avoid a
potential conflict with other uses in R-3 district, such as that
discussed regarding the recent Moose Lodge rezoning application.
�•1 �
PLANNING COMMIBSION MEETING, MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 13
Possible language is as follows: "Parking stalls may be 9 feet in
width for multiple dwellings and multiple dwelling complexes,
including rental and condominium apartments."
Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the proposed parking space width amendment
with the additional language in R-3 clarifying that the 9 foot wide
stalls would only be for multiple family dwelling complexes.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CL08ED AT 8:57
P.M.
MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to
City Council approval of amending the following sections of the
Zoning Code to permit nine foot wide parking stalls in certain
districts, and to require parking spaces to be double-striped, with
the additional language in the R-3 district limiting the width of
the parking stalls to only multiple family developments, as
recommended by staff:
1. DEFINITIONS
205.03.55. Parking Stall
A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store
one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or
alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile.
sAecified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts
a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18 )
feet. Parking stalls shall be striped in accordance with the
design on file in the office of the Citv Encrineer.
1. R-3 District
205.09.07.A.j3) Parkinct stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width.
Parking stalls mav be 9 feet in width for multiple dwellincts and
multiple dwelling comQlexes including rental and condominium
aAartments.
2. M-1 District
205.17.05.D.S13) Parking stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width1for
parkinct.
6M
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 14
3. M-2 District
205.18.05.D.113) Parking stalls mav be nine {9) feet in width for
manufacturinq uses warehouse and storage uses speculative
industrial buildings and ,parkinQ lots for long term emplovee
parkinQ.
4. 8-2 District
205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
All performance standards for uses in this district shall be
comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other
districts. Parking space sizes mav be reduced to nine (9) feet in
width upon approval of a special use nermit.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
5. RECEIVE MAY 22 1990. APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to receive the May
22, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to adjourn the
meeting. Opon a voice vote, Vice-Chairperson Rondrick declared the
May 30, 1990, Planninq Commission meetinq adjourned at 9:02 p.m.
Respectfully sub itted,
Lynn Saba
Recording Secretary
�
�
unroF
F���
DATE:
TO:
COl1I1MUNI"['Y DEVELOPMENT
DEPART'MENT'
MEMORANDUM
June 14, 1990
William Burns, City Manager � �
FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT:
Resolution Approving a Lot Split, L.S. #90-02,
by Milan Bozony
Attached is the above-referenced staff report. The Planning
Commission voted to recommend approval of the lot split with the
following stipulations:
1.
2.
�
The elevation of the first habitable floor shall be at 824 or
higher.
A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and
building permit prior to placing the house on the property.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached
resolution for the lot split request.
MM/dn
M-90-422
� 60
t STAFF REPORT
APPEALS DATE
���0� pLAJ�NNG COMNMSSION DATE : May 30, 1990
FRIDLEY CRY COI�lqL DATE : June 18, 1990 Au7� �M�dn_
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
IOCATION
SITE DATA
SI�E
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
8► ZONr1G
UMES
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
flNANCIAL MAF'LICATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREF�IVSNE PLAN
COMPATBILITY WITH
ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
L . S . 4� 90-02
Jake Bozony
To split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights in order to
create two buildable lots
West of 479 - 79th Way N.E.
West parcel, 12,145 sq. ft. - East parcel, 14,238 sq. ft.
R-1, Single Family Dwelling
R-1, Single Family to the East, North, and West; Fridley
Park Iand to the South
Available to new lot
$750.00 at time of building permit
Yes
Yes
Concern with constructing residence in or near flood
plain
Approval
Approval
; -
. '
Staff Report
L.5. #90-02, Jake Bo2ony
Page 2
Request
Jake Bozony is proposing to split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights
into two parcels; one 10 feet wide, the other 15 feet wide, and
combine them with adjacent lots in order to create two buildable
lots. Mr. Bozony currently owns Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block N,
Riverview Heights and also Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Springbrook Park
(see site plan). Lot 2 is located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E.
where Mr. Bozony resides.
Site
The subject parcels are zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are
the parcels to the north, east, and west. Riverview Heights Park
is located to the south.
Analysis
As Mr. Bozony owns all the lots involved in this lot split/
combination, he could in fact decide to combine Lots 2, 3, 4, and
5, Block N, Riverview Heights, and create a buildable lot for a
future dwelling unit. However, Mr. Bozony is proposing to split
Lot 2 in order to provide maintenance access for the future owner
of 479 - 79th Way N.E. to maintain the bluff line in this location.
Mr. Bozony is proposing to relocate a house that was recently
constructed by students at Fridley High School to the new vacant
lot, and will then sell his existing dwelling.
The proposed lots meet all the zoning code requirements for lot
size, lot width, and access to a public street. There are
utilities available for the future dwelling unit.
The westerly portion of the new lot is within the Mississippi River
flood fringe. The petitioner's surveyor is currently locating the
flood fringe elevation on the property and is preparing a revised
survey. The zoning ordinance contains the following four
provisions for subdivisions in a flood plain area (Section
205.24.09):
1. No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by the
City of Fridley for reason of flooding, inadequate drainage,
water supply or sewage treatment facilities.
2. Al1 lots within the flood plain districts shall contain a
building site at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection
Datum.
3. All subdivisions shall have water and sewer disposal
facilities that comply with the provisions of this Chapter and
have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual
. !
Staff Report
L.S. #90-02, Jake Bozony
Page 3
4.
building sites no lower than two (2) feet below the Regulatory
Flood Protection Datum.
All subdivisions in the flood plain district shall satisfy the
requirements of this Chapter. The City shall evaluate the
subdivision in accordance with procedures established in this
district.
The proposed lots meet the above criteria for subdivisions within
the CRP-2 Flood Fringe District. The lot is located at the edge
of the flood fringe district and can meet the flood proofing
requirements of the O-1 District. The site is serviceable by water
and sewer. If the lot split is approved, Mr. Bozony may have to
apply for a special use permit in order to construct his house
within the flood plain should the CRP-2 elevation line fall within
the location of the proposed dwelling unit. The code allows
construction of residential dwellings within the CRP-2 with a
special use permit.
Recommendation and Stipulations
Because the proposed lot split creates lots which conform to the
zoning and subdivision codes, and because the subdivision meets the
flood plain district criteria, staff recommends that the Planning
Commission recommend approval of the lot split as proposed to the
City Council with the following stipulations:
1. Should the CRP-2 flood fringe elevation fall within the area
that the dwelling unit is to be located, the petitioner shall
apply for a special use permit.
2.
3.
A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
The petitioner shall apply for a moving and building permit
prior to placing the house on the property.
�lanning Commission Action
Prior to the Planning Commission meeting, staff received
information regarding the location of the CRP-2 elevation line.
The flood fringe elevation line does not fall within the area where
the dwelling is to be placed. The petitioner will not need to
apply for a special use permit.
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the lot split request to the City Council. The Commission amended
the stipulations as follows:
Staff Report
L.S. #90-02, Jake Bozony
Page 4
. �
1. The elevation of the first habitable floor shall be at 824 or
higher.
2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
3. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and
building permit prior to placing the house on the property.
City Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the lot split
request by Mr. Bozony with the stipulations as amended.
ss
pi��►�"dING COl�iI88ION MEETING, MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 7
into account the lot area coverage allowable, parking requirements;
etc.
Mr. Bushey stated he is willing to pursue wh er they need to do.
OT ON by Ms. Sherek, seconded b . Saba, to table consideration
of special use permit re , SP �90-06, by Robert Bushey for
Sears Outlet Store u July 25, 1990, in order to give the
petitioner time come up with a new site plan or other
alternative
IIPO A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR
CLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
2. ONSIDERATION OF A IAT SPLIT L S #90-02 BY MILAN_BOZONY:
To split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in order to create
..the following two parcels:
East Parcel: Lot 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all
of Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota,
except for the South 25 feet thereof for 79th Way N.E., and
Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly
l0 feet, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with
the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview
Heights, Anoka, Minnnesota.
West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5 and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot
2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the
Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview
Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota.
All generally located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERBON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIHLIC BEARING OPEN AT 8:25
P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner owns not only Lot 2, Block N,
Riverview Heights, but also the three adjacent lots to the east and
the three adjacent lots to the west of Lot 2. The site is zoned
R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the north, east,
and west. Riverview Heights Park is located to the south.
Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Bozony is proposing to split off 10 feet
of Lot 2 and combine it with Lots 3, 4, and 5 of Block N, to create
one buildable lot. The remaining 15 feet will be combined with Lot
1 of Block N, Riverview Heights, and also Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Springbrook Park.
6T
pLANNING COMMIBSION l�EETING, l�Y 30. 1990 PAGE 8
Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Bozony is proposing to relocate a single
family dwelling unit that was constructed by the Fridley High
School students to the new lot to the west of his current dwelling
unit. The two proposed lots meet all the requirements for lot
eize, lot width, and access to a public street. There are
utilities available for the new:dwelling unit.
I�Is. McPherson stated a portion of the westerly lot is crossed by
the flood frinqe line that is designated by the National Flood
Insurance Program. The lot would then be goverried, not only by R-
1 district regulations, but also by the O-1, Overlay District,
regulations, for construction within a flood plain.
Ms. McPherson stated the zoning code contains four provisions in
order for a subdivision to be approved in a flood plain area. In
this instance, the two lots will meet all these provisions:
1. No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by
the City of Fridley for reason of flooding, inadequate
drainage, Water supply, or sewer• treatment facilities.
2. All lots within the flood plain districts shall contain
a building site at or above the Regulatory Food
Protection Datus.
3. All subdivisions shall have water and sewer disposal
• facilities that comply with the provisions of this
Chapter and have road access both to the subdivision and
to the individual building sites no lower than two (2)
feet below the Requlatory Flood Protection Datum.
4. All subdivisions in the flood plain district shall
satisfy the requirements of this Chapter. The City shall
evaluate the subdivision in accordance with procedures
established in this district.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner's surveyor has plotted the 823
foot contour, the elevation at which residences need to be built
at or above in order to be constructed within the flood plain. As
proposed, this contour does not fall within the area where the
dwelling is to be located.
Ms. McPherson stated that because the lot split creates lots which
conform to the zoning and subdivision codes and because the
subdivision meets the flood plain district criteria, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
lot split as proposed to the City Council with the following
recommendations (stipulation #1 in the staff report no longer
applies, and staff is recommending a new stipulation �1):
1. The first habitable floor elevation of the proposed
dwelling unit shall be constructed at an elevation of
su
�LANNING COMMISSION 1dEETING, MAY 30. 1990 �AGE 9
824 feet or greater to ensure that the first floor is not
within the flood fringe.
2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
3. The petitioner shall apply for a moving and building
- permit prior to placing the house on the property.
Ms. Patricia Bozony stated her husband was called away from the
meeting, and she is representing the petition. She stated they
want to go forward with this and are willing to do whatever the
City recommends. She stated they are very excited about putting
a house built by Fridley High School students on this lot.
O�i TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City
Council approval of lot split request, L.S. #90-02, by Milan
Bozony, to split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview Heights, in order to
create the following two parcels:
East Parcel: Lat 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all
of Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota,
except for the South 25 feet thereof for ?9th Way N.E., and
Lot 1 and that part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly
10 feet, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with
. the Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview
Heights, Anoka, Minnnesota.
West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5 and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot
2, as measured at a right angle to and parallel with the
Westerly line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview
Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota.
All generally located west of 479 - 79th Way N.E.
This lot split request is subject to the following stipulations:
1. The lowest habitable floor shall be constructed at an
elevation of 824 feet above sea level or higher to ensure
that the first floor is not within the flood fringe.
2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
3. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and
building permit prior to placing the house on the
property.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANZMODSLY.
sv
�I.�►NNING COMMISSION l�EETZNG. !�i!►Y 30. 1990 PAGE 10
Ms. McPherson stated this item will qo before the City Council on
June 18, 1990.
3. gUBT�ZC HEARING• CONSIDERATI4N OF AMENDING SECTION 205.17.03.0
(THE M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT), AND SECTION
205.18.03.0 (THE M-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) OF THE
FRZDLEY ZONING ORDZNANCE, �Y�ADDING THE FOLI,OWING LANGUAGE
- REGARDING LOT COVERAGE R�QUIREMENTS: '
(4) The lot coverage as stated in (1� above may be increased
up to a maximum of ten percent (10$ ) of the perm�.tted lot
area with a epecial use permit. In addition to the
requirements of this Section and the factors,�'indentified
in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use"permits, the
City shall consider the following factors /`in determining
the effect of the increase in lot coverage.
(a) For existing developed properties, the total amount
of existing hard surface areas�shall be evaluated
to determine whether a reduction in the total
building and parking cove �ge can be achieved.
(b) The petitioner shall prov� that all other ordinance
requirements are met, in�luding, but not limited to,
parking, stona water �nagement, and landscaping.
� MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and �pen the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, VICE-CHAIRP RSON 1CONDRICIC DECL�RED T8E MOTION
CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC BEARIN OPEN AT 8:�5 B.M.
Ms. Dacy stated the Plann' g Commission's recommendation on the
lot coverage amendment w s discussed by City Council, and the
Council decided they wan d to only amend the industrial districts
and require a special use pezmit to enable either existing
developed property or developer of a new industrial property to
petition for an incre se in lot coverage up to a maximum of 10� of
the lot coverage ra o. The Council asked staff to prepare two
standards to help t City evaluate special use permits. Staff did
that and develope Standard (a), that if a developer is going to
be proposing an i crease of up to 10�, staff will take a total look
at the site an determine whether or not they can achieve an
overall net re ction in hard surface areas. Standard (b) came
from a reiter ion of the existing ordinance requirements.
Mr. Dahlber stated that as was amply stated by Councilmember Steve
Bilings at one of the Planning Commission meetings when this the
discussed this may not be as originally recommended by
Planning ommisison, but it is at least a start in terms of looking
at appr riate sites and developments in the City that potentially
_ _ _ _ _ _ L . S . �� 90-02
Jake Bozony `A,
�r
S //2 SEC. �
cirr oF
a 3�
�E T ^ :.,. ,', 1 ; ;
� ������ � �1» � . ,_ --�� � �.
�L,�''� ,k E�S �a«w • � �';,, , � .
i ���„A* M' , `. ,`yr � � ^ � n SiR ��r.+' � .�, �. . \ , � ' 1F'
Y . J � ♦.
r�,�*".iy.C�'��'.X►�, �%'r� , lr �.�y'�, I���� t, �� S� � . W �� 1��,o t�
/ � !4 � � �Mi��ti'� i� M. �' � �� . ��` i_,� � o� �, .� I.
1t '1 - '�. F►1�MS ...�,'� k� �, . .1� ,.r r�` �E� '�� '� � � � �''t M a ai.i• .{• I .
i ,r, E ' , ' �
�,.. �
��, , ,q... �+,� i •' • y7� �✓�:.w '�J r' �.; � I A �' � jlb _�, r� ' i� , ELY
� H f '� {�� � . ��� �'� r. ii .•/�-%� �`�'"'I. .
'e �r: �.t ,- , , � I . 1�, i I�'�,'� � �� •�� �/1i • - �1 y• Ii��(�i1�(MUi
Y a .I ..�. I � ,/ I A 7 M'M.wl�. y,•y
/y.� � � r 'r .✓ l: ^ r r.� r � i L'.' � f }
., \ � � �. � ', I ' . .t- _ ' i � �� p
1' y y ^ � ] , � �, . r ... � _ .
� � � � 1(it' �1 . � A' '�� 1 � �'ti��` l� i�. _ • ' ..o .s, � '� !'F W �r�
. �IY . � , �i,i:. � V
�..}� � �1 `�, k�( , , y� � uF �� r \�� - ,�"+� � - a � ;- .i .
}L � .�9I'` • ��Ay '. � r � ..t �i'� l l :M. I� I
+ nl .. `\A� \ " \i[ YA�. I.* �
!w,� n' � �-^ ' ,: - A ^ � ����4. �°. LtOERT`f p�.
� ���r N � 1 IJ. v \��'' . I
"� Y Y � "�I
�. :r • �r � ` S, r ; ,�� �+�.IC'�.,'� . `,} .r���{
i�"�,,.� � �.' , !. , t t��, � ,r" �f' "'_ \ •i ' i
' �,�'. A y .',
1 -` � '�'� �� r '4' } •�~ � � .i�� �, .0
y'" r`, _ 7c: 1� ,{r..,. ., il..,�. �,•. _'�-
�� , 'r'` '" ,a. ��v:�� � X I
\ � ♦ s . � , ,.roti C � ' \
:� ��< ,; "x '" " T - LilNGFELL0IM � •
� �`' ` � • y .. ` � � , � M+ � ar � ��r �1- `� .
aT 1't .... � `. � •�` .�. V�i� r- Y .i.�� �4"� �• ��\ �
� io'� { � ' X �� i r I \ \
- - i'i.. . `' • !, .F i � Iw :�.• �I � • � \�
/ • .�R . � F �;� �.44 , iN � . � • "'"� I - r , .�_w \
' . �� �,� �� �( . � -� -i ly� � '� � .-1 x 1 t� .
\\ '� • • � � — T- �
/� / �
(\) 'R
\\�
V '��
1
\ q
�
\
..//i. �.
� �,`C� '�h .,Y., `�� .... ' .iifAr�+ i�`V : I, ,�
� �� �. � (ol . (�i �, r�. � P� .n + •
\ ' " . � . �9� �1
\ � . � tY': \
� \. � 4.. . 1 � �• i ^ � `(P P�Ot, , n. � QOO . /
� � `\` .1w ,,' •o� ): ` / •A .� ••1 Q� ,�,, � •
Y y1� y /i;
/ , ��"\ AF�� "'"a �1� �.
33 � r �� � .• . '� � � `,
�O �\' P :,r � . � � �l �� �� ,(�' `i., � • � f'/ - � ��:
.s �c� ?�°� ' '� ,� -N. %C� )
� \ �, \r`�,,; " n'��. � , ��p,, A9 J /. �
. t^'� �
'S-� � �y - - _ . • �.' „�<, 9,,�` � �:. .
�i � p�P
�� , �. � -'`�-�.: ��' .+ ��L ar
�'O ��' , s .- ` �« 4 q.�,, ��' : a�. ,�'L
/� •�\ � �_` ` r r • �0�� � Y ' v .
_ 1 �
\ � / � < `'
� �... �� ".� y �j •♦ •,�
`- �' � � �' '~�
i � ��. �j N ; '�'� - .,
` � ` ' I
Q•, N7 ` ti
���/ � c" � . � �
N% 9
Z�� /� � ." Gl � � ' p : �
I"— , ,o
� � - �� �''% ,,. _
34 .
LOCATfON MAP
a
L.S. �i90-02
` Jake Bozony
6X
, , J --- ,
` 9 : * • '' : i¢
; �.. � �„ 2
(� 1 �r . v> lY
. � • �` 9
� 8 �� P��r
, , , t �;
'j• 1� �,�. Q
I! , L ��� L19ERTY T.
♦ _
� � � •�� 6 0
� . _
�
. Q
� �. �� x �� LONG LLOW
� � \ � � aR ���,
;
� '� > � z . �, • ..� . . .
, , � .` y . . .,.,., ,,, .,., .,. , .
, � .
' � �J, � •►••', -,. . ,_�.,•;
`, � � ti •a-. `� "l: ..�': �....0
R I V E R V�E W \ • . . ��,a� .� � � � e s � � . . . . •
FtEIGM t ��' � a s.�.; ' � , :� �.� �•�•� ,•.•.•.'.�
�� i ``�� �;. ' , '� °,.� Q � � . � . •� •�•�•� � •�� •�.
� , �S' e • � . . . . . . �'( •
� .,. � ,� ` ,�, . • � � •.11�ir �
\ •` �- ,� � y . �� ;�, . �. �.
\\ �,� � .�`' � � y � � � � ! ,� • ., � � �, '''''.+� '
�� � o � � 1 � �1 e �P• ,� •�•�l�T �
\ � \ � ' � � `� 0 1� �'.t � �\ o � O� •.�`� ��, ����,��
� �"'� (;;i+ ` 1 , � p� � .��� � ♦ �
- � f:- • ti � � i � •
\ `e1 �.! , I 1� ' f S • ♦
. . � 15 � � .' • • .� ,�� fl�
`' fl.
\ � . 1� � ��� • �,
� . � � � � �
\ t � � �
\ � �v �' � 1 1 i � ► • �j ♦
. \ \\ ` �, t , 4° S ► � •
�
� �, �� �' i' _ ,. i : ��
■:.
ZONING MAP
X
3
�
�
�
�
�
f � �
�
�
�
L
�
�
�
�
. L � - Y / •
� S� ��
Z ���
o � � � �
$ R' b
a
� RE� ��
� �����
� ���s�
� �����
� �����
� � �� ��
��
.
�a�
� �����
__!,
, �.`..
1 • •w
.� ��
♦ �
. ` ��
i ,�
x.ss�sd�?�E�
J' -
a ; ,•
� '; : ��
; � �. �ti
, k�;�.• ; �
� `� f � i
t A • � �
� �! �• � � �
� ' '��� ! � ;� �
� � , •,, r,, .�� �
� �� a � % ��
.,
� S��P ' ; �%�
, , �
, ,
' � �1
�
. 1 '
� '1 � ; �;� ; r��"
� � , ��
� '
� � .
� ��R�.:at � � �
► , �
� 1
t �
� � �
' . �
' , �
.
� �, e� �
, �
: � w � '�:
� � ;
� �
, ,
; , �
- ib. o... �
+ �tti�, MCA
1
.. �"RwifOlv�l E
e
N
�
�
�
�
�
a
�
�
�
I
_��
�_!�� —
�
��
�o �o�
L . S . �� 90-02
S ��
� ��
a
� ��
� �
� �
C �
� �
� �
�
� �
� �
� �
, T,
,..
. . ..
���{ 1
_�:r�
`� � �f �
� r�
��_����
.,.;
,,.
.i �
. _._.�� `� _
�M'�s'f. 12` ALL,.EY
tso-- ._
—'�–r --:�--r .._
�
O �M
��
�r �
� �R
� ��
O y �
J
• �
�L
�
� �x
� ��
o ��
.
rn � �:
�, � C
�
,
1� s �, � '
�
, �� ` � � C'�'� � !
�, � ; ,�v
_ �; � • � � � � / �-"-.
��• �• � � � �x ��
�,, ; Existing � ;f i
� � Dwc I l i ng � .��%C.
�S� i •t?! ' o � /
�� � , Vi
4 �
�
�; � + i
e� �
� i � �
, , �� ; �, �.
�'; � � � -�
r � � � � � i 1'�
� � � r � � �' � �=
; ��� � � ��
_ � � � j � � � IT 1
Curb
?;9�� .
WAY
� ��t�T/p r
� ��J.
N. �.
��
m�
�m
>�
�w
t
�
�
N
.
.I
SITE PLAN
■1
sz
RESOLUTION NO. - 1990
RE50LUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT,
L. S. #90-02 , TO SPLIT LOT 2, BIACK N, RIVERVIEW
HEIGHTS, IN ORDER TO CREATE TWO BUILDABLE
PARCELS
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the
, 1990 meeting; and the Planning Commission
stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, such approval was to split Lot 2, Block N, Riverview
Heights, in order to create the following two parcels:
East Parcel: Lot 2, except the East 10 feet thereof, and all of
Lot 1, Block 1, Springbrook Park, Anoka County, Minnesota, except
for the South 25 feet thereof for 79th Way N.E. , and Lot 1 and that
part of Lot 2 lying Easterly of the Westerly 10 feet of said Lot
2, as measured at right angles to and parallel with the Westerly
line of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka
County, Minnesota.
West Parcel: Lots 3, 4, and 5, and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 2,
as measured at right angles to and parallel with the Westerly line
of said Lot 2, all in Block N, Riverview Heights, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
All generally located west of 479 -?9th Way N.E.
WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey
from the owner; and
WHEREAS, such approval will create two buildable parcels.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the
petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County within six
months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and
void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1990.
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
� . .
EXHIBIT A
Resolution No. - 1990
1. The elevation of the first habitable floor shall be at 824 or
higher.
2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
3. The petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and
building permit prior to placing the house on the property.
�
�
c�nroF
F���
DATE:
TO:
COl1I1M(�NITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
June 13, 1990
William Burns, City Manager�
FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT:
Establish Public Hearing for Lot Coverage
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Attached is the staff report regarding the above-referenced zoning
ordinance amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval
of the ordinance amendment at the May 30, 1990 meeting. The zoning
ordinance requires a public hearing before the City Council for a
zoning text change. Staff recommends the City Council establish
July 9, 1990 as the public hearing for the zoning ordinance
amendment to the lot coverage section of the M-1 and M-2 districts.
BD/dn
M-90-411
_ _
�
PLANNING DIVISION s��
� MEMOR.ANDUM
crnr oF
FRl DLEY
DATE: May 25, 1990 ���iu ,
��
TO: Planning Commission Members �i c
0-
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Proposed Lot Coverage Ordinance Amendment
Attached is the proposed amendment to the M-1 and M-2 Districts,
adding an additional section to the Lot Coverage section to permit
a special use permit application to exceed the maximum lot
coverage, up to a maximum of 10�.
The Planning Commission recommended that a special use permit not
be permitted; however, the City Council preferred to require a
special use permit. The City Council also directed staff to
. prepare standards by which the permit could be evaluated.
Therefore, two standards have been proposed for the Planning
Commission and City Council final action.
The Attorney's office is also in the process of reviewing the
proposed language.
Recommendation
5taff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the
proposed ordinance amendment as presented.
BD/dn
M-90-372
. � �
PUBLIC �iEARING
BEFORE THE
CITY COUNCIL
Notice is hereby given
Fridley City Council
University Avenue N.E.
the purpose of:
that there will be a Public Hearing of the
at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431
on Monday, July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. for
Consideration of amending Section 205.17.03.0
(the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District) and
Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning
Ordinance, by adding the following language
regarding lot coverage requirements:
(4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above
may be increased up to a maximum of ten
percent (l00) of the permitted lot area
with a special use permit. In addition
to the requirements of this 5ection and
the factors identified in Section
205.05.04 to evaluate special use permit
requests, the City shall consider the
following factors in determining the
effect of the increase in lot coverage:
(a) For existing developed properties,
the total amount of existing
hardsurface areas shall be evaluated
to determine whether a reduction in
the total building and parking
coverage can be achieved.
(b) The petitioner shall-prove that all
other ordinance requirements are met,
including but not limited to,
parking, storm water management, and
landscaping.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an
onnortunitv at the above stated time and place.
WILLIAM J. NEE
MAYOR
Publish: June 27, 1990
July 4, 1990
Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley
Community Development Department, 571-3450.
Ms. McPhe stated this item will go before the City Council on
June , 1990.
3. pUBLIC HEARiNG: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SECTION 205.17.03.0
(THE M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DZSTRICT), AND SECTION
205.18.03.0 (THE M-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) OF THE
FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ADDING THE FOLIAWING LANGUAGE
- REGARDING LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS:
(4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased
up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the permitted lot
area with a special use permit. In addition to the
requirements of this Section and the factors indentified
in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the
City shall consider the following factors in determining
the effect of the increase in lot coverage.
(a) For existing developed properties, the total amount
of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated
to determine whether a reduction in the total
building and parking coverage can be achieved.
(b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance
requirements are met, including, but not limited to,
parking, storm water management, and landscaping.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION
CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:45 P.M.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission's recommendation on the
lot coverage amendment was discussed by City Council, and the
Council decided they wanted to only amend the industrial districts
and require a special use permit to enable either existing
developed property or a developer of a new industrial property to
petition for an increase in lot coverage up to a maximum of 10� of
the lot coverage ratio. The Council asked staff to prepare two
standards to help the City evaluate special use permits. Staff did
that and developed Standard (a), that if a developer is going to
be proposing an increase of up to 10�, staff will take a total look
at the site and determine whether or not they can achieve an
overall net reduction in hard surface areas. Standard (b) came
from a reiteration of the existing ordinance requirements.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that as was amply stated by Councilmember Steve
Bilings at one of the Planning Commission meetings when this was
discussed, this may not be as originally recommended by the
Planning Commisison, but it is at least a start in terms of looking
at appropriate sites and developments in the City that potentially
6EE
�LAN�IING COMMISSION MEETING, 1dAY 30. 1990 PAGE 11
could be better served if a qreater area of lot coverage is
allowed.
OM TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERBON �ONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PQBLIC BEARING CLOSED AT 8:55
P.M.
MOT ON by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City
Council approval of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light
Industrial Zoning District), and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2,
Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance,
adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements:
(4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased
up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the permitted lot
area with a special use permit. In addition to the
requirements of this Section and the factors indentified
in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the
City shall consider the following factors in determining
the effect of the increase in lot coverage.
(a) For existing developed properties, the total amount
of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated
to determine whether a reduction in the total
building and parking coverage can be achieved.
(b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance
requirements are met, including, but not limited to,
parking, storm water management, and landscaping.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL QOTING AYE, VICE-CBAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED tTNANIMOIISLY.
4.
1.
�UBLIC HEARING: CONSZDERATIdN OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING
SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMiT NINE,_,F44T
WIDE PARKING STALLS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND Tg�-�QUIRE
PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED: -
� ,
DEFINITIONS ,% �
205.03.55. Parking Stall
A ten (10) foot wide by twenty foot long area to store one (1)
automobile, which has acce to a public street or alley and
permits ingress and egre of an automobile. Parkina stalls mav
- - - ' �' -� -� ----�.....,. ;., �t,; �
code. Where a
may be reduced
'+ g stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length
eighteen (18) feet. Parkinq stalls shal.l be
sFF
�
�
cinroF
F� ��
DATE:
TO:
COAILMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
MEM�RANDUM
June 14, 1990
William Burns, City Manager�
6GG
FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT:
Establish Public Hearing for Zoning Ordinance
Amendment for Parking Space Width
Attached is the staff report for the above-referenced 2oning
ordinance amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval
of the ordinance amendment at the May 30, 1990 meeting. The zoning
ordinance requires a public hearing before the City Council for a
zoning text change. Staff recommends the City Council establish
July 9, 1990 as the public hearing for the zoning ordinance
amendment to amend the parking space width.
BDjdn
M-90-412
�
�
cinroF
fRlDLEY
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
PLANNING DNISION
MEMORANDUM
May 25, 1990
Planning Commission Members
6HH
�
� �
���L
� ��
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Proposed Parking Space Width Amendment
Attached is the proposed ordinance amendment to various sections
of the zoning ordinance, to reduce the width of a parking stall for
specific uses.
The Planning Commission recommended that the parking stall width
be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the City Council
preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet only for long
term employee parking, industrial uses, and for multiple family
developments. The City Council also recommended that all parking
spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be double striped.
The Planning Commission may want to consider additional language
to the R-3 district, to limit the width of the parking stalls to
only multiple family developments to avoid a potential conflict
with other uses in the R-3 District, as was discussed regarding the
Moose Lodge rezoning application. Possible language is as follows:
"Parking stalls may
multiple dwelling
apartments."
Recommendation
be 9 feet in width for multiple dwellings and
complexes, including rental and condominium
The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the proposed zoning ordinance amendment as
presented.
BD/dn
M-90-373
Notice is hereby given
Fridley City Council
University Avenue N.E.
the purpose of:
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
CITY COUNCIL
that there will be a Public Hearing of the
at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431
on Monday, July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. for
Consideration of amending the following
Sections of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance to
permit nine foot wide parking stalls in certain
districts, and to require parking spaces to be
double-striped:
1. DEFINITIONS
205.03.55. Parking Stall.
A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long
area to store one (1) automobile, which has
access to a public street or alley and permits
ingress and egress of an automobile. Parkinct
stalls may be nine (9) feet in width for uses
specified elsewhere in this code. Where a
parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the
length may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet.
Parkina stalls shall be striped in accordance
with the desiqn on file in the office of the
Cit� Engineer.
1. R-3 District
205.09.07.A. (3) Parkinct stalls may be nine (9)
and condominium apartments.
2. M-i District
205.17.05.D.S13) Parkinct stalls mav be nine
j9) feet in width for manufacturinct uses,
warehouse and storage uses speculative
industrial buildincts and parkincr lots for lonct
term employee parkina.
3. M-2 DistriCt
205.18.05.D.S13) Parkinct stalls mav be nine
f9) feet in width for manufacturinct uses,
warehouse and storaae uses speculative
industrial buildincts and parkina lots for lonct
term employee parkinct.
611
6JJ
Parking Stall Size
Page 2
4. S-2 DISTRICT
205.22.6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
All performance standards for uses in this
district shall be comparable to other similar
uses that are allowed in other districts.
Parking space sizes mav be reduced to nine (9)
feet in width upon approval of a special use
,permit.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an
opportunity at the above stated time and place.
WILLIAM J. NEE
MAYOR
Publish: June 27, 1990
July 9, 1990
Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley
Community Development Department, 571-3450.
6KK
�"dING COMMISSI N M�ETING. 1SAY 30. 1990 PAGE 11
could be better served if a greater area of lot coverage is
allowed.
OM TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close � e public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIA�ERSON 1CONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:55
P.M. ��
OTI N by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba�, to recommend to City
Council approval of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light
Industrial Zoning District), and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2,
Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of-the Fridley Zoning Ordinance,
adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements:
(4) The lot coverage as ��ated in (1) above may be increased
up to a maximum of �n percent (10�) of the permitted lot
area with a spe�Ial use permit. In addition to the
requirements of��his Section and the factors indentified
in Section 205-�05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the
City shall c�nsider the following factors in determining
the effect/of the increase in lot coverage.
(a) F existing developed properties, the total amount
f existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated
to determine whether a reduction in the total
building and parking coverage can be achieved.
(b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance
requirements are met, including, but not limited to,
parking, storm water management, and landscaping.
Q N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VZCE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR
CLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY.
4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING
SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMZT NINE FOOT
WIDE PARKING STALIS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND TO REQUIRE
PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED:
1. DEFINITIONS
205.03.55. Parking Stall
A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to stcre one (1}
automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and
permits ingress and egress of an automobile. garkinc1 stalls mav
be nine (9) �'eet in w�dth for uses specified elsewhere in this
code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length
may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet. �arkinc� stal s shall be
s��
gl���"dING COI9�iIBBZON KEETIIdG. 1[I�Y 30. 1990 B�GE 12
gtr�,ped in accordance with the desian on filp in the office of #�e
inee .
1. R-3 District
205.09.07.A.s3) Parkinq stalls mav be nine (9) fee� in width.
i. x-1 aistrict
205.17.05.D. 3 a'n ta s a e'ne et w'dth or
- . - ----- -•........,> >*; �,e
parkina.
3. M-2 DistriCt
205.18.05.D.(131 Par?cina stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for
- • ----- -�......i �t,,.e
parkina.
4. 8-2 DistriCt
205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
_ All performance standards for uses in this district shall be
comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other
districts. Parkina space sizes mav be reduced to nine (91 feet in
w�dth ur�on approval of a s�ecial use oermit.
OT ON by Mr. Dahlberg, seaonded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
IIPON A oOICE VOTE, li1LL VOTINQ AYE� oICE-CSAIRBERSON 1CONDRICR
DECLARED THE l�[OTION CARRIED l�PiD THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN !1T 8:53
p.M.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission recommended that the
parking stall width be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the
City Council preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet
only for long term employee parking, industrial uses, and for
multiple family developments. The City Council also recommended
that all parking spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be double
striped.
Ms. Dacy stated the Planninq Commission might want to consider
additional language to the R-3 district to limit the width of the
parking stalls to only multiple family developments to avoid a
potential conflict with other uses in R-3 district, such as that
discussed regarding the recent Moose Lodge rezoning application.
pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 PAGE�
Possible language is as follows: "Parking stalls may be 9 feet in
width for multiple dwellings and multiple dwelling complexes,
including rental and condominium apartments."
Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the proposed parking space width amendment
with the additional language in R-3 clarifying that the 9 foot wide
gtalls would only be for multiple family dwelling complexes.
MOTION by Mr . Saba , seconded by Ms . Sherek, to close the publ ic
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING 11YE, VICE-CHAIRPERBON 1CONDRICK
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND T8E PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:57
p.M.
OT ON by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to
City Council approval of amending the following sections of the
Zoning Code to permit nine foot wide parking stalls in certain
districts, and to require parking spaces to be double-striped, with
the additional language in the R-3 district limiting the width of
the parking stalls to only multiple family developments, as
recommended by staff:
l. DEFINITIONS
205.03.55. Parking Stall
A ten (10) foot wide
one (1) automobile,
alley and permits
by twenty (20) foot long area to store
which has access to a public street or
ingress and egress of an automobile^
. _ _�ii L�� .
iQIi1111 a\.G711� i«w r� .�� �- _ _
specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts
a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18)
feet. Parkinq.stalls shall be stri�ed in_accordance with the
design on file in the office of the Citv Encxineer.
1. R-3 District
205.09.07.A. 3 Parkin stalls ma be nine 9 feet 'n w'dth.
Parkin stalls ma be 9 feet in width for multi le dwellin s and
multi le dwellin com lexes includin rental and condominium
apartments.
2. M-1 District
205.17.05.D. 13 Parkin stalls ma be nine 9 fe t'n width or
�nanufacturinQ uses warehouse and storaae use�- sneculative
'ndustrial buildin s and parkina lots for lona term employee
parkina.
6MM
pl,�NplpG CO24SI88ION lIEETING, l�AY 30, 1990 P�GE 14
3. �[-2 District
205.18.05.D.j13) Parkina stalls mav be *+ine (91 feet in widt for
_ __ � _�__s..� .,�e� _ �neculative
�
4. 8-2 District
205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Al1 performance standards for uses in this district shall be
comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in et er
districts. garkina space sizes may be redu�ed to nine (91 fe in
width upon avp oval of a snecial use v�rmit.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, 11LL VOTING 71YE, oICE-CHI�ZRPER80N 1CONDRICR
DECLARED THE 1�IOTION CARRIED IINANIMODBLY.
5. gECEIVE MAY 22 1990 APPEALS COMMZSSION M�DI TES:
OM TION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Ms. Sherek;�to receive the May
22, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes. ��
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING
DECLARED THE MOTION C!►RRIED IINAN
�DJOURNMENT:
01�TION by Mr.
meeting. Opon a
May 30, 1990, P�
E, VICE-CHAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR
SLY.
Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to adjourn the
vo e vote, Qice-Chairperson 1Condrick declared the
ninc Commission meetiaq adjourned at 9:02 p•m•
Respectfu y sub itted,
Lyn Saba
Re ording Secretary
6NN
�
�
cinroF
F�a�
DATE:
TO:
COl1/iMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'
DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
June 14, 1990
William Burns, City Manager�S(/
FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Lisa Campbell, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Approve Appraisal and Relocation Consultant
Contract for Iverson Property; Riverview
Heights Acquisition Project
We intend to begin acquisition of the Iverson property at 7899
Broad Avenue N.E. As has been done in the past, the City will
contract with Federal-State Relocation Consulting Service and CR
Pelton and Associates to assist us with relocation consulting
assistance and appraisal services. The attached contract is
similar in content to past agreements. The cost of the appraisal
will be $600.00. The review appraisal by Donald Hennesy will be
approximately $125.00, and the relocation consulting services will
be approximately $2,405.00. We recommend the City Council approve
the attached contract as presented.
BD/dn
M-90-417
7
. ��
� �
/�'i
�
j �. '
\
�
c�� �
G _
'� � .:�i
�1�
�M
F�' ' � `� ' .� �o� ) �. 5. �{ l• .�t . y
�' �� �
-Z._• .:a-.�
' Et ; :. �j' � L�NGFELLOW
, ., .. `� y
F,���d �
I , . i ' I � �1 t � t2 r. .-- r1 � � J ' "{�` �J� �s 7/ �J' �-r
T < l�r
' � r ' sz �t�:,'L • � , � � -,� � 1�s _•:� �, ti-�. ,--
e • J Y '� .• •• .. —
' � _ O � •r �.`
. �. ., p , �
, d.
3
., y �S y� 0 3 � � �
/ n t� ( fJ . . • F�
� 5 .t < i � � � �: •� Z � f t f s �� :. �
. _ _ � .. . .� � �
�.. „ v —
0
� .f - :.....:.. ��. ,� � : _
„ ; � {„� �.
� �� �. �?�:�:�:� r� � , �? ..�. ,.� v i.v
� • q ' '"• � � �89d ��� .�' . ; ;' • r�' . ..w. `f //ii .i
, : : -.-r r •!' ii•
�\` , + •'•'•' . 1 y� . � t f� '�•iJi% �Pi.I/ Oin' ) .
�::�: :s ::::� .
� �
. f'' t..� . �"!� �� � r -i � .
� ,y .,� ' .
1r � l f r s
� � , � � � � �s�l = ` ��9 7883 � ��� � �"�
\ � � � � �892 7g � ���,r _ ��f� ,�^f�
� . i , � �� � � \A . � ' r
� +0 "'� � �•. � �� \ ,, � P;
� � r � � � � , " = • : Q��-
.... � ��,, -� � � _-
'` ��� � � �� ' � ,�' ' � , ..�.- .�- �
t � ,r*� o ` �
_ �-.2 E? ,: � . � ,
. �' �"'� °'. x j , ` y1869� '
� �, ;: ,' .:: ��0� , • � •• , .
- ,. ,:� �� �gTy . ""` � •' �� 3 f
' S
'�„� '• � �W � � � ' `� �I •'' ; �(� � .
t
Parcel� 5 � 1991 Propoaed�a � �: " �, � �8G8 • (���P �L� �s� ':r S�! �' .
. = � � _ � F �� � ��. -..1e�., J,='�.�.
Parcel 4 1990 Pro osed Acquisition � � � � � ��) � ; � . �z .. ,. .
P `-� � ��'vf',. �"�, �8G( _.R .�� .Q.�
„ , �„� ,� � • ,N� + � � ., �p�
'-`�' � �� ,r. � �t,;,r � ��., ?gG0 : ° �_ �. 0�'�'.' �� '
�
�.. � :s�;; ' � � �,,� �+ ..'' ��I� ' !'' �81�-
� 1 t . .,� e"� ., �w_�►� + . � �C
�KEY H � ���� • ` � .�� � �� �esy �� p ' �
i \� �� I �,� � �, , � �
� � � � Previously Acquirsd Prop�rtr � '' :;� L"; ..,�` �' ��L c+�1 � y
� � p r ',, ` ri3 ' �O
. �_ � .
��::. � � 763(
" � Propos�d Acquisitions /
� �� ' �n .�• . = (��) '
� � �
City P;
^
! Scal�: t'=200'
�
�. �.
. .
.l
•� �„�• ° .s� . � * �a
�
� � � .,
� � � O +E:"�' � �,.
\ �Y�'�S
� ` :'.� r',r;*' ° �
� - �
_ J _
\ \•.
��
34
INDUSTRIAL
COMMERCIAL
RESIDENTIAL
*
Ct �ELTON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Appraisers j
8 /Consultants
* NATIONWIDE APPFiAISAL SERVICES
*
PROFESSIONALLII RECOGNI2E0 � �
Ysmbsr of Amaiean SocMty W Appr+bers
American RigM ol Way Ap'n
Institute ot Yalwrs
Institute of 8usimss Appraisen
N�tional Aswciation of Mvisw Appraiasn
CORPORATE OFFICE:
299 NO. SNELLING AVE. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55104
June 6, 1990
Ms. Barbara Dacy
Planning Coordinator
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
RE: Market Value Appraisal Report
Iverson Residential Property
7899 Broad Avenue
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
Dear Ms. Dacy:
�
.�.�
TELEPHONE (612) 645-9171
Thank you for the opportunity to bid a narrative real
estate appraisal of the above captioned property.
C. R. Pelton & Associates, Inc., would provide
adequate copies of a narrative real estate market value
appraisal of 7899 Broad Avenue for the City of Fridley for a
fee of $600.Q0. It is my understanding that the work would
need to be completed in 60 days or less. This time frame
appears to be adequate to fulfull the requirements of the
job.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to be of service
to you in your valuation needs. I look forward to hearing
from you.
Very truly yours,
C. R. PELTON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
n B. Tessier, A.S.A.
S aff Appraiser
JBT/pt
PHOENIX, ARIZONA • AUSTIN, TEXAS • HOUSTON, TEXAS • MOBILE, ALABAMA • LAS VEGAS
RESI DENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUST$I/,�L
/ �r
FEDERAL - STATE
RELOCATION CONSULTING SERVICE INC.
?�)9 North Snelling Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
Phone: Ama ('�de - 61 '_'-G45-73''9, 645-9171
June 11, 1990
Barbara Dacy
Planning Coordinator
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Mn. 55432
Re: Relocation Proposal
Iverson Property
Riverview Height Project
Dear Ms. Dacy:
Federal State Relocation Consulting Service will provide relocation
consulting services to the City of Fridley for the Iverson Property
on an actual time basis at the rate of $65.00 per hour with a maxim�un
fee not to exceed $2,405.00
Sincerely,
��YI/l,C{,�
Thanas Donohue
7D
AGREEMENT
Agreement for Consulting Services for the Riverview Heights
Redevelopment Project, Fridley, Minnesota.
This agreement, entered into as of the day of
, 1990, by the City of Fridley (hereinafter referred
to as Contractor), and Federal-State Relocation Consulting Service,
Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Consultants).
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Contractor desires the provision of certain technical
assistance and other services pursuant to the terms of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 117.50 et seq., and or the Uniform Relocation
and Real Properties Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, whichever is
applicable, in connection with the implementation of the Riverview
Heights Redevelopment project as heretofore adopted by the
Contractor, and
WHEREAS, the Contractor desires that the Consultants provide such
assistance and services to provide acquisition and relocation
assistance in this project, and
WHEREAS, the Contractor proposes to acquire certain real property
and desires that the Consultant furnish the Contractor certain
services with respect to such property, and the Consultant
represents that he is fully qualified to perform such services and
will furnish such services personally, and
WHEREAS, the services to be provided under this Agreement are
necessary to achieve the purposes of the Riverview Heights
Redevelopment under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1894, Public
Law 91-646), hereinafter referred to as the "Act", (CDBG Funding).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
Consultants agree to provide services as set forth below under
Section I entitled "Scope of Services" and the Contractor agrees
to pay for such services in the amount and the manner as set forth
below under Section II entitled "Compensation", and Section III
entitled "Method of Payment of Fees".
7E
Residential Relocation Services
a. The Consultant will distribute an information booklet on
residential relocation assistance and all appropriate forms
and data to each residential occupant expected to be
displayed. At this time the consultant will:
Obtain a signed receipt for the informational statement provided
by the Contractor in accordance with applicable regulations.
Explain the residential relocation program and the displacees
responsibilities to receive benefits.
Ex�lain how to receive various kinds of assistance in finding new
locations.
Survev the residential relocation needs and prepare Family Record
Card.
Provide Notices of Displacement within 30 days after initiation of
negotiations.
Analyze existing data to determine eligibility of the displacees
relocation expenses for compensation.
Interview residential displacees to determine housing needs.
Identifv and determine the cost of comparable replacement housing,
based on City selection.
Provide referrals to replacement housing units.
Provide other social services, on an as needed basis.
Assist the displacee in determining the more advantageous payment
alternative to claim for moving expenses and provide further
instructions on how to proceed.
Issue 90 day notice as necessitated after referral to replacement
housing is made.
Determine if selected replacement location is decent, safe and
sanitary.
Assist eligible residential occupant in preparation of claim for
Replacement Housing Payment for 180 day homeowners.
Assist eligible residential occupant in preparation of claim for
Rental Assistance Payment/and or pown Payment Assistance for 90 day
occupants.
Assemble the appropriate claim forms and documentation for
signature and submission for approval.
7F
The Consultant will transmit to the Contractor the final claim for
its action. Recommendations will include the amount of payment to
be made and any special considerations.
In completing this Contract, the Consultant does not assume the
responsibility for:
Preparation of status report.
Housing of Last Resort Services.
Accounting and record keeping (except as related to the
specific claim).
Payment for direct loss appraisals, property analyses, and
moving cost estimates and/or bids.
Work associated with a relocation grievance.
II COMPENSATION
The Contractor also agrees to make monthly payment to the
Consultant in the amount of $65.00 per hour for each and every hour
expended. All office overhead, secretarial services, and other
supportive services shall be included within such hourly charge.
In no case, however, shall the total amount paid exceed $2,405.00
in accordance with the Scope of Services.
III METHOD OF PAYMENT OF FEES
Monthly requisitions may be made subject to receipt of a statement
from the Consultant specifying that it has performed the work under
this Contract in conformance with the Contract and that it is
entitled to receive the amount requisitioned under the terms of the
Contract. The Contractor will make payment on such invoices under
receipt; provided, however, that payment shall not be made for any
incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work until same is remedied
by Consultant without additional cost to the Contractor.
Services not described or covered in this contract will be charged
at the rate of $65.00 per hour.
7G
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PROPERTIES COVERED UNDER THIS CONTRACT
1) Margaret Iverson - SF Dwelling
7899 Broad Avenue N.E.
Lots 22-24, Parcel 4
Court Preparation
It is understood and agreed that the amount of compensation stated
above does not include necessary court preparation and testimony,
and that in the event the testimony of the Consultant is required
in any legal proceeding in connection with the relocation of
occupants for the project:
The Consultant agrees to bring its final claim up-to-date, to make
the necessary preparations for testimony, and to appear as a
witness on behalf of the Contractor on the dates required, and
further agrees that the fair and reasonable compensation for its
services shall be at the rate of $65.00 per hour. The consultant
will be represented by the legal representation of the City in the
event of litigation relating to services provided to and for the
Contractor; or actions relating to the Contractor's decision.
Contract Period
The Consultant shall commence performance of this Contract upon
Notice to Proceed by the City Manager or upon execution of this
Contract and shall complete performance of this Contract no later
than sixty (60) days after the last occupant of real property has
vacated the project area and all appropriate documentation has been
provided by the displacee to the consultant.
Interest of Certain Federal Officials
No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States, and
no other Federal official, shall be admitted to any share or part
of this Contract or to any benefit to arise herefrom.
7H
Covenant Against Contingent Fees
The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any
company or persons, other than a bonafide employee or technical
subcontractor working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or
secure this Contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person other than a bonafide employee or technical
subcontractor working solely for the Consultant any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other
consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or
making of the Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty,
the Contractor shall have the right to annul this Contract without
liability.
Changes in Contract:
The Contractor or the Consultant may, from time to time, request
changes in the scope of services to be performed hereunder. Such
changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of the
Consultant's campensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and
between the Contractor and the Consultant shall be incorporated in
written amendments to this Contract.
Termination of Contract
The Contractor or the Consultant may terminate this Contract or
renegotiate this Contract upon thirty (30) days written notice of
such. In the event of termination, all property and finished or
unfinished documents, data, studies, and reports purchased or
prepared by the Consultant under this Contract shall be disposed
of according to Contractor directives and the Consultant shall be
entitled to campensation for any un-reimbursed expenses reasonably
and necessarily incurred in satisfactory performance of this
Contract.
Extent of Agreement
This Contract represents the
between the Consultant and the
negotiations, representations
oral. This Contractor may be
signed by both Consultant and
Personnel
entire and integrated agreement
Contractor and supersedes all prior
or agreements, either written or
amended only by written instrument
Contractor.
The Consultant represents that it has or will secure all personnel
required in performing the services under this Contract as provided
above.
All of the services required hereunder will be performed by the
Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in
the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under
State and local law to perform such services.
71
Non-Discrimination
The Consu�tant will not discriminate against any employee, or
applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, sex,
national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status in
regard to public assistance, or age. The Consultant will take
affirmative action to ensure that applications are employed, and
that employees are treated during employment, without regard to
their race, creed, color, sex, national origin, religion, marital
status, disability, status in regard to public assistance, or age.
Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment
advertising, layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of
compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to
employees and applicants for employment notices to be provided by
the Contract setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination
clause. In addition, the Consultant will, in all solicitations or
advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the
Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive
consideration for employment without regard to race, creed, color,
sex, national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status
in regard to public assistance, or age.
Interest of Members of Contractor
. No member of the governing body of the locality in which the
project is situated, and no other officer, employee, or agent of
the Contractor who exercises any functions or responsibilities in
connection with the carrying-out of services to which this Contract
pertains, shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in
this Contract.
Interest of Consultant
The Consultant convenants that it presently has no interest and
shall not acquire throughout the duration of this Contract any
interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner
or degree with the performance or services required to be performed
under this Contract. The Consultant further covenants that in the
performance of this Contract no person having such an interest
shall be employed.
__ _ _
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the Consultant have executed
this Contract on or as of the date first above written.
gy; ATTEST:
Federal-State Relocation
Consulting Service, Inc.
299 North Snelling Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55104
gy; ATTEST:
Mayor William J. Nee
City of Fridley
By: ATTEST:
William W. Burns
City Manager
City of Fridley
7J
C•�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
M$ M O R A N D II K
TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGER (9 �
FROM: SBIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERR
SIIBJECT: JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITB ANORA COIINTY
OPTICAL SCAN VOTING EQIIIPMENT
DATEt JIIN$ 12, 1980
The attached joint powers agreement was drawn up by the Anoka
County's Attorney's office and includes all of Anoka County. We
will be receivinq 24 copies of this agreement in which the Mayor's
and City Manager's signatures are required. When all copies have
been signed, an original agreement will be sent to the City. A
copy of this agreement has been sent to the City Attorney for his
review.
The agreement states that Anoka County will provide election •-
programming for all the municipalities and that the cities and
Anoka County will conform to the Secretary of State's rules and
regulations and those of the State of Minnesota. Much of the
language in this agreement is standard contract language.
I recommend approval of this agreement.
: `
JOINT POWERS AGRECM�IVT FOR TI-IE ACQUISITION OF
OPTICAL SCAN VOTE TABULATION EQUIPMENT
THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the
undersigned units of government, all acting by and through their governing bodies, pursuant to
Minn. Stat. § 471.59 providing for the joint exercise of powers.
WHER�AS, the undersigned governmental units located within Anoka County desire to
use Unisys ES-2000 optical scan vote tabulation equipment beginning with the 1940 state primary
and state general elections; and
WHEREAS, the Unisys Corporation has submitted to the Minnesota Secretary of State a
request for certification of the Unisys ES-2000 optical scan vote tabulation system; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Secretary of State has approved Anoka County's use of the
Unisys ES-2000 system on an experimental basis pursuant to Minn. Sta� § 206.81 in the 1990 state
primary and state general elections; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreement contained herein, the
parties agree as follows:
I. PURPOSE
The parties �agree that they have joined together for the purpose of acquiring the
Unisys FS-2000 optical scan vote tabulation computer hardware and software for county-wide use
beginning with the 1990 state primary and state general elections.
II. JOIIVT POWERS PARTICIPANTS
Anoka County and any municipality located within Anoka Couaty are eligible to
participate in this joint powers agreemen� The conditions of this joint powers agreement shall
be effective as to an eli�ble participant when the joint powers agreement has been executed by
the duly authorizsd representatives of that party. Each party hereby certifies that authority to
enter into this Agreement has been established by a duly passed resolution of its respective
governing body.
III. TERM
This agreement shall commence when it has been duly executed by Anoka County
and municipalities representing at least 50 (fifty) precinets and shall continue until terminated as
provided herein.
IV. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTI�S
1. The parties shall abide by the following conditions so long as the Unisys ES-
2000 system is used on an experimental basis pursuant to Minn. Sta� § 206.81:
a. Anoka County shall provide the Secretary of State with a list oE each
city and township agreeing to the experimental use of the ES-2000
system at the state primary and state general elections;
b. Anoka County shall develop and file with the Secretary of State, no
later than July 31, 1990, a backup plan for counting ballots in the
event of equipment failure ;
c. Anoka County shall file, with the Secretary of State, no later than
July 13, 1990, a plan describing the procedure for training election
judges in the use of the voting system;
d. Each municipality shall provide instruction for voters in the use of .
the voting system and at least one public demonstration prior to the
state primary election;
2. Upon certification of the Unisys ES-2000 system by the Minnesota Secretary
of State, the parties' use of that system shali conform to those conditions mandated by the
-2-
: :
laws of the State of Minncsota and any rules established by the Office of the Secrctary of
State.
3. Anoka County shall provide elcction pro�ramming �or use by all of the
municipalities using the Unisys ES-2000 system. Anoka County shall acquire the hardware
and software required to program and integrate with the individual vote tabulators used by
the municipalities in each oE their precincts. The municipalities shall provide for the
acquisition oE the vote tabulators.
V. STRICT ACCOUNTABILTfY
A strict accountins shall be made of all funds and report oE all receipts and
disbursements shall be made upon request by either party.
VI. AUDTT AND RECORDS RETENTION
The records and documents relating to all matters which are the subject of this
Agreement shall be subject to inspection, review and audit by the parties and State officials so
authorized by law during regular business hours. All such records shall be retained for a period
of at least three years after termiaation of this agreemen� If any party furnishes a written request
during this period requesting retention of records beyond the three year period, records shall be
retained for the period requested.
VII. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS/DATA PRACTICES
The parties shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations in their
performance under this AgreemenL
All data coqected, created, received, maintained, disseminated, or used for any
purpose in the course of performance of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government
-3-
C•1�
Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes � 13.01 et seq. or any other applicable state statutes and
any rules adopted to implement the Act, as well as State and Federal laws on data privacy. The
parties agree to abide by these statutes, rules, and regulations currently in effect and as they may
be amended.
VIII. AFFIRMATIVE ACfION
In accordance with Anoka County's �rmative Action Policy and the County
Commissioners' Policy against discrimination, no person shall illegally be excluded, on the basis of
race, creed, color, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, disability, handicap or national
origin, from full employment rights in, participation in, be denied the benefits or, or otherwise be
subject to discrimination under any program service, or activity which is the subject of the
Agreement in accordance with the provisions of any and all applicable federat and state taws
against discrimination.
IX. INDENINIFICATION
The parties mutually agree to indemni£y and hold each other harmless from all
claims, demands, and causes of action of any kind or character, including the cost oE defense
thereof, resulting from the acts or omissions of their respective commissioners, officers, officials,
agents and employees relating to activities conducted under this Agreement
X. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING �
It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained
herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and all negotiations between the
parties relating to the subject matter thereof, as well as any previous agreement presenily in effeci
between the parties relating to the subject matter theceoE Any alterations, variations, or
-4-
[ l ��
modifcations of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when they have been reduced
in writing and duly signed by the parties herein.
XI. WI'TFIDRAWAL
manner.
Any party shall have the right to withdraw from this Agreement in the following
The governing body of the withdrawing party shall pass a resolution declaring its
intention to withdraw effective on a speci6ed date, which date shall not be less than thirty days
from the date of the resolution, and shall send a copy of the resolution to each party's governing
body.
Withdrawal by a party shall not result in the discharge of any legal or financial
liability incuned by such party before the effective date of withdrawal.
XII. TERMINATION
This agreement shall continue so long as the Unisys ES-2000 system is used by a
majority of precincts in Anoka County or until the parties mutually agree to terminate the
Agreement by joint resoiution passed by the parties' governing bodies.
-5-
�;
IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, the parties of this Agreement have hereunto set their hands:
COUNTY OF ANOKA
BY=
Dan Erhart, Chairman
Anoka County Board of
Commissioners
Attest:
sy:
John "Jay" McLinden
Anoka County Administrator
CITY OF ANDOVER
(4 Precincts)
By:
James E. Elling, Mayor
Attes�
By:
Victoria Volk, Ciry Clerk
CITY OF ANOKA
(7 Precincts)
By:
Stephen M. Halsey, Mayor
Attest:
By:
Mark Nagel, City Manager
-6-
CI1Y OF BI:THEL
(1 Precinct)
By:
A1 Grant, Mayor
Attes�
By.
Brenda Juneau, City Clerk
CITY OF BLAINE
(17 Precincts)
By:
Elwyn Tinklenberg, Mayor
Attest
By:
Doaald G. Poss, City Manager
TOWNSHIP OF BURNS
(1 Precinct)
By:
Dennis Berg, Chairman of Board
Attest;
By:
Cathy Wood, Clerk
�
CITY OF CCNTERVILLE
(1 Precinct)
By:
George Haberman, Mayor
Attest:
By:
Tamara Miltz-Miller, City Clerk
CITY OF CIRCLE PINES
(2 Precincts)
By:
James Keinath, City Administrator
AttesL
By:
Peggy Link, Finance Director
CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIG%TTS
(9 Precincts)
sy:
Edward M. Carlson, Mayor
Attest
ay:
Robert S. Bocwinski, City Manager
TOWNSHIP OF COLUMBUS
(1 Precinct)
By:
Lloyd I�nutson, Chairman of Board
Attest:
sy:
Barb Masteller, Clerk
-7-
CI1Y OF COON RAI'IDS
(23 Precincts)
By:
Rick Reiter, Mayor
Attest:
sy:
Gary Jackson, City Manager �
CITY OF EAST BETHEL
(2 Precincts)
By:
Roger Grams, Mayor
Attes�
By:
Sherri Anderson, City Clerk
CITY OF FRIDLEY
(13 Precincts)
By:
William J. Nee, Mayor
Attes�
Br-
William W. Burns, City Manager
CTTY OF HAM LAKE
(4 Precincts)
By:
Marilyn Schultz, Mayor
Attest:
By:
Doris Nivala, Ciry Administrator
�
CITY OF lI1LLT01'
(1 Precinct)
By:
James Shear, Mayor
AttesL
By:
Karen Danz, City Clerk
CITY OF LEXINGTON
(1 Precinct)
sy:
Michael Swanson, Mayor
Attest:
By:
Sheila Beyer, City Clerk
CITY OF LINO LAKES
(2 Precincts)
By:
Harold L Bisel, Mayor
Attest
By:
Marilyn Anderson, City Clerk
CITY OF LINWOOD
(1 Precinct)
By:
Al Nordin, Chairman of Board
Attest:
By:
Marcia Fabricius, Clerk
MKD:CONT:EL.ECTION.JPA:90
-8-
TOWNSIiIP OF OAK GROVE
(1 Prccinct)
By:
Robert A. Preus.�, Chairman of Board
Attest
By:
Judi Peterson, City Clerk
CITY OF RAMSEY
(5 Precincts)
By:
Gary Reimann, Mayor
Attest:
By:
David Hartley, City Administrator
CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK
(3 Precincts)
By:
Harley Wells, Mayor
Attes�
By:
Donald B. Busch, City Clerk
CITY OF ST. FRANCIS
(1 Precinct)
By:
James R. Lucas, Mayor
Attest
By:
Sharon Fulkerson, City Clerk
C•]_i!
TO:
FROKs
DAT$:
SIIBJECT:
Eng�ncenny
Sewcr
Wa�er
Parks
Streets
Ma�n�enancc
MEMORANDUM
William W. Burns, City Manaqer�� PW90-219
John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Works Director /�'1�'"�
June 11, 1990
Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206
Change Order No. 2
Based on discussions with the Water Department and Park Department
staff's regardinq the water service to the park shelter building,
it has been determined that it would be prudent to install a 1-inch
service at this time instead of a 3/4-inch service. The lonq
length of the service, in excess of 300 feet, has the potential to
cause pressure and volume problems in a 3/4-inch line;
additionally, there is the potential that the water service would
be used in watering the qrounds.
A breakdown of costs and funding source is as follows:
Base Buildinq
Outside drinkinq
fountain
Water Service
Sewer Service
Change Order �1
Change Order �2
(Upgrade water
service
Sewer Availability
Charge
Electrical Service
to Building
Gas Service to
Building
$71,072.00
820.00
2,434.50
2,434.50
2,550.00
300.00
600.00
1,201.00
1,000.35
Recreation Capital
Improvement Fund (C.I.F.)
Recreation C.I.F.
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Recreation C.I.F.
Water Fund
Recreation C.I.F.
Recreation C.I.F.
Recreation C.I.F.
Recommend the City Council approve Change Order No. 2 for Flanery
Park Shelter Project No. 206 in the amount of $300.00 to upgrade
the size of the water service from 3/4-inch to 1-inch.
JGF/MAW/ts
Attachment
�-J
��.��
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITY AVE., N.E.
FRIDLEY, l�i 55432
June 18, 1990
Karlen Construction
901 - 125th Ave., N.E.
Blaine, MN 55434
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 2, Flanery Park
Shelter Project No. 206
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your
contract for the Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206 by adding the
following work:
Additions•
1.
IT
Change 3/4" copper
water service to 1"
copper
APPROX.
OUANTITY
1
PR C
Lump Swn
TOTAL ADDITIONS - CHANG$ ORDER NO. 2
TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS:
.�. u • 1:Y
�� ��
$ 3�•�
Original Contract amount. . . . . . . . . . . . $76,761.00
Contract Additions - Change Order No. 1. ... 2,550.00
- Change Order No. 2. ... 300.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOIINT $79.611.00
Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, on
�..
G. Flora, P.E.
'rector of Public Works
9A
Karlen Construction
Change Order No. 2
June 18, 1990
!-1 :
Approved and accepted this / 3 d'``- day of �-- •
1990, by
r ��: . - •
/ -
'. �== -/
.-
,i /
Approved and accepted this day of .
1990, by
0
CITY OF FRIDLEY
William J. Nee, Mayor
William W. Burns, City Manager
�
�
c�nroF
F� ��
DATE:
TO:
C011IiMUNI't'Y DEVELOPMENT
DEPART'MENT
M EMO RAN D UM
June 14, 1990
William Burns, City Manager��
FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT:
Resolution Approving a Final Plat, P.S. #90-
02, Michael Servetus 2nd Addition
Attached is the final plat for the above-referenced project. The
plat has been reviewed and approved by Anoka County. The final
plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Staff
recommends the City Council approve the resolution authorizing the
Mayor and City Manager to sign the plat and authorize its
recording.
BD/dn
M-90-413
10
10A
RESOLUTION NO. - 1990
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT, P.S. #90-02,
MICHAEL SERVETUS 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Plat,
P.S. #90-02, on April 25, 1990 and recommended approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also conducted a public hearing on the
proposed Plat at their May 21, 1990 Council meeting and approved
the Plat at their meeting; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Fridley hereby approves the Plat, P.S. #90-02, Michael Servetus
2nd Addition, with the stipulations attached as Exhibit A, and
authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Plat as prepared
by Lot Surveys Company Inc.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the petitioner is requested to record
this Plat at Anoka County within six (6) months or said approval
with become null and void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1990.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
, :�
Exhibit A
Resolution No. - 1990
Page 2
1. A park fee of $1,500 per lot for three residential lots shall
be paid at the time of building permit ($4,500 total).
2. The petitioner shall petition for the proposed improvements
(67th Avenue extension, water main loop, sewer extension).
3. The vacation request, SAV #90-01, be approved.
4. Documents to be approved by the City Attorney regarding the
need for soil correction shall be recorded against Lots 1, 2,
and 3, Block 1, Michael Servetus 2nd Addition.
� P . S . 4� 90-02
�F � Michael Servetus
N M CORNEA Z�
SEC. /J
'Q �l� y
� 2 il.,' \_ �il
' i ; � �/M/
O r �� \a (:f60� _
�. C./� .I i..//� d-�� •
^..;y � �AwI M/�'�/�
N l/2
I : G�
;� �-- :i
' I ._ ,'7GR� 1 (j �t,p) i ' J' �N
�' s .a 3 � .,� ; r
� roa" , py f
�
SEC.
��TY oF
r
,
N
�h a i�---
. � � 1,�Y
.1�1.} ♦ 1�) '% 1
M �' *2�� : j � 9 • 0 .. , r�� , r�___�• • �.
� '.� � • ' �w '� , 2 ,,,� � � P��� ' ` �3 � � 6
� '•, hrl? � c i» . �r,.�••,r• �.a) tzo) �G
j� 2� � b ;"� ,.• q `''. .''� � CE liao) 'N J�> y
3 ,, y�' � ��F . •tEaaA , � �� � _�..,,s.
' �j %g• • ~ .�+ 'r '� .
.�
; ,.,� ` ��` 2'• _ '�G CREEK '� z �� +I ; :68 M AVE. RO; �s�'� I � =�-
i (y p ' m'j � � :v r-_"' i O~
� f: 4 �' w.� (u1 `i, 'h <., . t�f�0) � Y) � �' \
0 i ° ? � �.�' ��. M �: ` p) I r1 . � - ' •7r d ' +,.+' �G1
Q � ; %�I . 7 , �o ° • . �j '� . �y �. A'�. b; ��: � J 4
� .,� •. ` �° O \` ,� Si�c, 1 t '�.i ' a► i5I /G / i J"" � '"�" :� � Q''� ' J
m ,,, ,� ,y s e : e � . �i . : � N ;;
a " � 1 ,i '""w,
� 1,- �. O: g t � sCHANNEL ROAO 1—��--
'' , -�.a ' � �. 9 y �,. ��,,, �
, ` � . ,r ' /a' ` 'i ; �� � F :ial r� . � � � � � r.,, } �rMe'�. i w k ,-.s� �Py
.. . . •� h � , R51A �, „� 1 , , �-
,; �. ., � .
5�--;_�1`��1�p � ,�,,',. � �� 4j ��^ ;I Np ; �io.���.�,;;, �N a7Ja ,
,, :_ �� �. „ r � . �, ► p. �e 1 �9 p� 23 �z� ; ��.. 4'�-
1!""uc °3 i3 � i,� , 3 � ;: W y" �" �J io i %� 0' ' � 4 K"
� �� ;, �4 � /. � � �
� ' - j ,. i .," -. ,4 ' 4
��� � � � � �', � � /�� � � ' � O � v a s��. Z � � ' -�� •� �
� � .. .� ,,,' « � S ..V 2� 4�"' $'
,�\ - . -�69 "-AVE:�=`���-:—�-S,�F.�Ero; > -- �66 ,� T •+� �
16 ; � :� o��':,;� � _�..�� d;,,.�� � ,�d ��' �' _ �" , X ''£ F ' 4 �
,� / � ,.�� a .o �`),,, ! ,,., .
�/s,y 1� `,° � �� i� i , ",�;. � � w� 3 � _ ,� 3,�, sE •�� 40 � 4EY
I_ _ � �� /S� �:i;'�' �. ��� � 6 't� e 27
"7 '� ,/ .�, ' , Y a.e..c�.+..y� __� ,..o) s ..
a`� /O r � j� / �� C', !I� 6' i1 �' "rw t�� y.7% Jn � 4 F�,.
� VDaI '� ..
���_ �. � � f � sA 28 .� \ 7:
:�, w' g;: � :,.�...,..._ ..... w,'1.
� � -rO � ' 4i � �-�- �(I) 6 BBnr y o.w� ��i 4
� �. s .r � .t� � .; vr > W ao � 6 G� ' ; .:
//�� ``�. ��.., � ' � l�n c � �" __ "' 6 C �� � 4 0
T�; r soi � ��1�. � �i A� C � j°6'� ` 6 Q �� J e` , r" � J CiD ��� s..
� �r M ,� m ' ' � � +� iQ ,i 3 =� !.'w O 11M
'N �{' '40� � ..�... � tA �, � w 6 �,,,, �.; � q. g ,..�
I `�� ' , 4 J B fi1 ;�o: I !A G�'� yil� ` • %G�. ..� ��' �� � �
'Z.�) /� � � ` µ . 4
� . I .,
a,t � � �. ..., p � - - - ,, k ia'`'� "'2 'r' ��N Z �.
I
� gF._.•�� -�" ..�...�� W�„ a w � �-� g 2y� r� i r` � .�
.
c
�e 3 �
3
I �
� � :2-8G(4 n �Y Mi • ' ° �+' ' � p '%.i ' �, r � � . �i a�+' i �'0s " z'
i•' ,r'
� v~f z �� ,znr '� .�1.0 ° � � o�w i Q. .. n� �/` �S W - /OMy S � � �
9A'gC''9� • p --- gg tcs, �+, , a, ,. / T ; �
W r' 81 8 H 2 i; ii ie 5 ��9 �r�` � 9� � ri . r� �
< <7 y � j !�0 r!J M � yti �.d'��i �e, I �e " "(
- - ' FQBdSSFP 1"` ...-- "� - -
�i� tw ^ ���
EC. l � \
1
23 24
LOCATION MAP
�~
Z
� �
�"'� U
0 a
Q Y
a�
�
N
�
�""
w
�
LL�
�
r
� W
J
G
W �
Q ``
= o
V ,.
G U
3�
� � •
a :ti
�"� I
i�s
� � 3�
� s
y � �
� i
'� ��s
� �s ��
� ti� _ � �
, :� 1 n
�ti �A�
� �� Q � �
� �r �3�e
"� _� �,��
� s� ' a
�� �� � i�
� ti y� � �; �
�� �� i�; �
�ti � i� 3
�� �� ��� �
� s�
� 5 s!� �
�� �� ��!
�� �� ��!
a
g ��� �
_I
�
.:J
�
\
�
1
r
s�
�
� �
t
�
�
�
��
�
�
�
��
••
�1
�
�
�
�
�
:
g
�
�
�
�
��,
� w �
� •�_
���
� �j�.
�� ��5
�� ���
�: �Yi
� ' '�
ti�
���
_�
��
w
� Z�
���
���
���
���
���
���
���
� �
��°•
���
�
_53�
� �
�
� 1
� �
� r
� � ��
F� .
��
.. ._.:--• ... _ _,. ....,.. �. : .
M 1.- --3 fi V�.�S ���.�a
—! _W'J_�1__ —
- — � �-------
; :• �
8 8i �
. �� / �� �
. 3 �__�.,�..�.�. _� ;�
%--- ---,
� : �o� � ,�
w � �� N � �:F
w � � �
' _ • I �s�L.O�A�__� I ••:J
�
�
��
�����
.
��a
-
y I
:i'4
. i
i
1,
�-- iossi ---- I � ..:�'' � '. I oc
: �� � FI � . ,� D •..; � i
:,M �� y��� M �� � �Jv �� ; n
" l ------^--� L-------�i.M / •1';i--� -
�R� �i
�i� a -',
� � �
° �"��
� i �'_��'
t
� � �P �����
z 1 J �
�� �`� =3�
a
y� �� t�Jt��
�6 Vpq*�
J Yy , �`
� Y��V
� I"
y�
9
�� �i�
�^ � �
����
�� C��
3 ���
�� :
g ti
i�3 �3�
�
r�
a �
���
�s�
� 3
3i�
a ! �'
1�A
'��
y
9�3�
��„a
a �� �
����
� i�
� ��
ti ;s
� �
�
�3 �
oa �
3 A3lN'd0���', :��.8� g. . •.,
�:' � ':�'
�' _
lY 6�O�i_-" ---
� �;
� ��
� �o
� �i
� p
� P
�
�<��
��g�
���
����
�, �
��_`�
:
�
s�
�
�
i
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
i�
10D
Eng�neennq
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance.
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager� PW90-232
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director \
Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Work Director �►R��✓
DAT$:
SIIHJECT:
June 14, 1990
Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 3
Attached are four (4) resolutions which create Street Improvement
Proj ect No. ST. 1990 - 3 under which the followinq improvements
will be constructed:
l.
2.
3.
Extend 67th Avenue west approximately 280 feet in conjunction
with the Michael Servetus 2nd Addition plat.
Extend Oakley Drive north approximately 50 feet in conjunction
with the Michael Servetus 2nd Additional Plat.
Expand and improve the entrance road and parking lot at the
Springbrook Nature Center.
I am requesting that all four (4) resolutions be considered at one
(1) meeting in order to have construction completed this year. The
owner of the property that will benefit from the extension of 67th
Avenue has waived the right to a public hearing.
The engineering estimate and funding source for each portion of the
project are:
1. 67th Avenue Extension
2. Oakley Avenue Extension
3. Nature Center Parkinq Lot
Improvement
Cost
$50,000.00
6,000.00
45,000.00
Funding
Source
Assessment
Street Fund
Recreation C.I.P.
Recommend the City Council consider and approve the attached
resolutions at the June 18, 1990, meetinq to create Street
Improvement Project No. ST, 1990 - 3.
JGF/MAW/ts
11
Attachments
fRIDI�Y
l �
� �
I • C�. 1
i
' (
(
i
1
� �.�tl�Of� �,��11(• •�.►��t C0�1��• \
' N J01 . �� -� _ �� .�..' �
. n G �
�� � n LOCKE� 1: PARK ;� /� ,
G ��� .
v
�i �
�'� J J oc.� �...
� I� ^ , . �w.6•N
� � �
� :� C' i? `7 � e� G .
G ��� n c� � s s� � G
v , G � C C•
.�
^ � n v lj �, !? . L
� ` . �
� �� , c:
�s;, �.. �, c� G;,) �'� C V .. �
u —�^ . _. .4 �� •�.7
•���f � •��l�7Y�l
`f ....
ii/L��� s��.
� '
�"i
..ea
��a �
�
�,s��1A1
1 '^ _ � V
_ • w
A .. Q .•.. t�
�; � ('� It
J i
���. a �, � , ,
• • ~- •• 1'
V �.i �•,� �'
v .' „ t
i�
, ' . �
� o
'\ _ _--► I li
a � ✓ ��
� �, �•- ,
� V � i+ � .� .
' ww�wr
� s.rc■
J
°3 � �+ (� n I
..
� wc.00+�.Nos rr�c s
OAKLEY DRIVE •
�� �� ?
�� M�T � i � �,• ••�
1 ���! N�• • � ♦
''�i�}''t � _,�
, �' � • 1 �
i , ...� . .
N �N\ ��
h�•
�� � �.
��
�ytb1�NI,
!�• wt�K
���•
M�f '
�� �
•• /
r�ef
w� t� � �� t r .� �
•
• •
i
��r
� � •.��
=� �����
� �
. �� `
��
�`
•ee*•o,�c• �.c
.�....
•o�a r
`
. �
w `` ' �
M� �
��
•
• �
S .� •
•■ �
` • ti
� � K�
� •
� �
a � ��t�
!
67TH AVENUE
�.. U
: ,
�
i ���:
. `
r . �
Z
� = .�
� �
� •. w ��. .
�
wa� aMtf
Mw�M •
� Mt
saw�w `
N•��� �r�
r
�
•
f
J� ' '^' "`-
....,. j
....».
1 '
.
z
►�
:
;:
:
.....i.I
�...
N
-� 2 �
� �
CITY OF C N 11 A PI Ds �
�s*M �c
,\ .. �_.. . ..�. - --T—� 13
.�,
� � � � r
•'� . 4i (,5� •�J ^ , �•. �; !~ � �' � �+ Ci
`� ' t v ��� vJ � � � • ,,�' � C� �.� � � � � i`, i
,;� '
,� • � �' �� � � .,�,, `: ' ' , � � j � ,� ,9 � 3 ,�
r • �. �^* �
s�`•.�:�f � � � J� � � � ��,<� :��.��, �.. a ���.
°� `� �,� � ��, - `, NATURE CENTER� �3� �
�
�;� � �, � �' PARKING LOT � ^� � � -� �
.
� '� � � � � .� � � �• �• ;, �j a ,�
_'��� ��'�� :� �: �� � �'� =J �„� � c� �� � � `� '�
Q� �:, � ��J d SP•tMiGDFO�I� NAT �.iE t F.N ItR 1�••y '•'' �^.i � r
�V � � � � `' � .�'jJ.��- \�j �� �_f� �J1,�A �;d1 � � r�
i� V� � � �J M � �
�:�'.� ��v��?,j ? c9� .:9 3,3 :�� � •3 � � '' � '�
.� J v � .+�� Jl�, �'9 � � � � 3 , � �
« � � `.� "a � . ,� `�r, � � '� ,� �� `�
c�
, � ,� w��, :.
� .` E:� ,� ' f.� ., j h _ z �, ?� -� ,�� i „3 ., :J ; :
�� v�`��y��.. ���',� ��� �,��'� ��`-��, �
��� •� f�, c �i► .' �; . +� ..a .� •� � � ;, - '1
g-�. t� � �� j �.� �� �- �' -� ' ' �y {%
� ` � � +� � v . S��
��
�
�:t
��
,.. �. ti
v..,
►���t �\
A ��� t� \
�.% • \
� ��
•�7� ; 1. `
�4t�ih� •��
f�det�E w�.\
��K \�
W '• .
` •` � �
�', � �—_
�`�
��
� �� 1
:-.cr•, �' .
� �; :
t ` �
�� IIi
. .��
.�..., ...,.,.
i
C
►
•
►
�
•
t •
's �
��fT �1h.
y e
t
i
_ �Y
� w
! �
:
w. w'•',,' �
CITY pf �
�. .._._�.
��/1
.�
/ !
3
-
�MNtMp �
tlM1A il
s
��
11B
,
, .
SLA1 NE
...•.r.. . ..
,.�. .�
I
�
Z
�
d
H
�va
•1��00j 1���
�
O
ekNat •�
11C
1�OI�T1'I�T �UU. - 1990
'I:r�• � • •I'1�'.:�I' � C •'!:A � �■ I• '♦ sM/ Y' •
�� :r: � I• :r; •I' �:1: •�-: Y:I;fI'/��1' _ Y'/;i1: � 1"�� • 's I:N
• • �
rx�, �, s rr x�soLVEU v� the city cau�cii of the City of F�i.dley as
follc�ws:
1. �at it appears in tile interests of the City and of the praperty cwr�ers
affecked that there be ooru^tnyct�d oertain iaQ�ve�nents to-wit:
Street iaQrove�ments, i�ludi�t�g 4radir�4, stabilized base, hot�ix bit�ninous mat,
�o�rete cu� arrd gutter, sidewalks, water ar�d sanitaxy sewer services, stoYm
sew�er systeqa, ar�d ather facilities located as follaws:
�: � ' ;� �11: � �:/� :� .t:il' • 1�: � � � • .
• � r:�•.�• r� n•r. s��+ -,+• •'�� c •
ZYsat the wdrk involVed in said inp�rwe�xits list.ed abave st�all hereaftQS be
de.signated as:
S'1ZiEG�p Il�VENff�A' p1i0►TEGT PD. ST. 1990 - 3
2. Zt�at the Public Worl�s Director, John G. Flora, City Hall, Fridley,
Mirnesata, is Y�reby authorized and directed to draw the P���YY Plans ar�d
specif icatiar�s ar�d to tabulate the results of his estimates of the oosts of said
im�r�7ve�nts, includir�q every it� of oost r-rcm ir�oe�tior� to �letior► ar,a au
fees and expenses inatrned (or to be irxurY�ed) in �ec,�tion there�►ith, or the
f inaT�cir�g thereof � c�7d to make a prel i mi na,v �rt of his f isydings stcztit7q
therein whether said imp��avemerYts are feasible and wh�ether ti�y can best be made
as Pr�osed. or in aocu�ection with sane o�ther iaQ�ovc�nents (at�d the estimated
oost as recamnerxied) , iricludir�g also a desc�ription of the lar�ds or area as may
Yeoeive benefits thex�efrc�t ar�d as may be prq�ased to be assessed.
3. Z31at said prel;min�rv re�ort of the Public Works Director shall be fi�nished
to th,e City Ca�cil. .
_ CiSi� �.• � •• • Y�� �:C M •�'11 M� •i' Y:1: M •I' ' /� �:� = : �: �`� •1:
�I I' • �
t�1LLY.l1l7 aJ • � � 1'Y'�i�
Ai itr71 i
� ��� /• • � « « ���
12
�� �U• - 1990
•�s_• � r •�sa�:a � � �:r. •i:� � n �• •• v:,���i•� � v:,�:,� � � c •
� �y. • - �:I: • Il:i :I:,�• • / � •' �:I: r• Y:,1' •1' �:1: •�� �: Y•�1 •�. •i
N :rl •.1 V � � / 1 • '� � • � I :H •! :il : � 1 ' '- � ' :r I:N •. • :r • • �
�S, Resolution No. -1990 adopt�.ed on the 18th day of Jw�e, 1990,
the City Cau�cil, ordered the preliminaiY P�, sF�e�ificatiaris and estimates
of the oosts thereof for the improvenents in this project.
�. ��ion of oertain inprov�nts is dee�ned to be in the
irYt�x�e.st of the City of Fridley arid the pmperty owners affec,-�te� theti,�by.
�� �. B� 1'r REeOLVED• by the City �u�ci1 of the City of Fridley as
follaws:
1. �at the pl�el.3minaYy re�ort su�altted by Jc�hn G. F1ora, Public Works
Direc�tor, is h�y r�eoeived ar�d aoo�t,ed.
2. Zi�at the City C1erk shall act to ascertain the name ar�d addres.s of the
�wtrx of eadi p�aroel of larid directly affec.�ted or within the area of larxi.4
as may be pro�o�ed to be ass�ssed for said it��rov�neitts, ar�d calculate
esti.mates of as5essments as may be pmapo�ed relative thereto against each
of said lands.
3. �at the area proposed to be assessed for said improv�nents ar�d eac�i
of the�n as natsd in said r�tioe are all tiye lat�ds and are�.�s as noted in
said natioe: All of the same to be asses..sed praporti�ately a000rding to ..
the ber�efits reoeived.
4. Z3�at the estimates of ass��„+-� of the Clerk shall be available for
� n,'�ection to the aaner of arYy jx�el of lar�d as may be affected th�expl�y
at arry public heaririq held relative thex�et,o� as w�11 as at any prior time
reas�able and aanvenient.
5. �at all propertY aar�er's wi�ose praperty i.s liable to be as�sed with
the makir�g of ti�e in�rave�nents have sigtyed an agreemetzt req�stinq the
impravments ar�d cxanstitute 100 peiroetYt of the praperty aai�ers who will
benefit frcm the i�rov�x�t and cb wa�� � ric�t to a public hearinq
which is allc�w�eci under the r�ormal prooec�ures set forth in Mfinr�ata
Statutes C2]�aptet' 429.
6. FL�d.s far the inQrovesaent of the Sprir�r�ocalc Nature Cerrtc�s Parkinq Lo�t
have been establistyed in the 1990 City Bu�dget.
; :,:�� �. .. • :,,� �:�: « .. �� «. .�- �:�: « .,: - �. �:. : : �: .� .�
�� �- • �
ATI'EST:
-� n• ,. . . « « �;�,
WIILIAM J. N� - 1�YCYt
June 12, 1990
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave., N.E.
Fridley, I�T 55432
PW90-149
12A
The Michael Servetus Unitarian Society, beinq the owners of certain
property in the northwest quarter of Section 13, Township 30 North,
Range 24 West, described as Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and Outlot A of Michael
Servetus Addition in Fridley; hereby requests that the City of
Fridley initiate the following improvements to the properties this
year:
1. Extend 67th Avenue approximately 280 feet west with a 30-foot
wide (face to face) bituminous roadway with concrete curb and
gutter.
2. Extend the existinq sanitary sewer line in 67th Avenue with
seven (7) appropriate service connections, approximately 280
feet west.
3.
4.
Extend the existing 6-inch waterline in 67th Avenue, with
seven (7) appropriate service connections, approximately 250
west.
Install storm water drainaqe facilities as necessary.
The Michael Servetus Unitarian Society aqrees to the assessment of
all costs relatinq to the above improvements against Lots 5, 6, ?
and 8, Michael Servetus Addition and Lots l, 2, and 3 of the
proposed Michael Servetus 2nd Addition. Each lot to be assessed
an equal amount. It is our understandinq that the estimated
improvement cost is $116,000.00.
Additionally, the Michael Servetus
right to a public hearinq on the
improvements.
�
Unitarian Society waives its
assessment of the requested
for the
��. �� � _ �� �
. .r_��.� �-�
,�
��lT �D. - 1990
'IJ: �I � • . •"'1� .i1' �♦ � I' ' � • r I:.r. . � � I. _ � :t' 1M�" V� I• -
�� � r� yi: •1' •� _ �:1:�'1:r�1- : 1r'1�/:.�/ � 1• ' • • } 1:,� ' • ' . •
1�8� 1ZeS011$1Q1 NO. - 1990 O�der�ed t'�]B pmeliIDir�aty pl��
specificaticns and esti.mates of tl�e ooBts ti�ereof for the in this
p�oject.
1�is, �t�esolutian rto. -1990 reoeivirg the p�e.timi.naiy re�ort azxi
reoeivir�q p�titions to waive the public hearir�q an the matter of the
oor�x,-�tion of certain inQ�ov�nts fa� this p�oject.
NOW �Oi7E, � IT FtF.90LVID, by the City Oalt�cil of t2�e City of Fridley, Anoka
Oo�uYtY. Mi�sota as follaas:
1. 'Il�at the follawirg imp�ove�nesYts P�''aposeci bY Oan'�cil Rer�olutirn No. -
2990 are hez'�y oidex�ed to be effec.'ted ar�d o�le�t,ed as soal as reasoc�'lbly
possible, to-wit:
stre�e�t inProve�ents, includin4 9radi1'�9, stabilized ba�se, hot-mix bit�mminous mat,
oo��ret�e cu� ard gutter, sideWalks, water at�d sanitaty sewer sexvices, stoYm
s�ew�►r systen, and atiier facilities located as follc�ws:
�' ' :N �I: � �:I� :,1 _1:a' ' ��J � � � •
'� H:1•.�• - �� �1'C M:N Y:+�' 'l��� f •
�t {ic MIViJt lilYVl� � .7OlY l�LWG►Q1�...7 � li.��i � ��++� I�J.G�iKL �
C�E?S1CJI13t� a3:
gTt�P IIrlpl�VF1��[iTP pl�TECT �D. 8T. 1990 -3
2. Zhat the w�rk to be perfoYmed tu�der thi.s p�oject may be perfozmed w�der ane
or more �s as may be cleeoed advisable t�c�n reo�eipt of bids.
3. Zt�at the Public Works Director, Jdm G. Flo�a, City Hall, FYidley►
Miru�eso�ta, is hereY�y designated as the Ehgineer far� this iaQ�vv�nent. He shall
Prepare fir�al plarLS ar�d snecificatirns for the makinq of a�ch inp�ovements•
� ;1:A� ��� � �• ' :M� �:1: M •� 11 M■ •l' �:1: M •t' • ��) " �:/ _ � �: �'� •�`
11 I` ' �
WII��AM �7• NEE� MAYC�2
ATPEST:
4rrRr Fv A. i�1?�1PAIA - QTY CLII2K
13
�OI+Ol'IC�T �U. - 1990
'IJ: �I I • . •I'i�';il' � C � I' '�� � J I:r � •.� � �I�
�� •1•IV:iI' / � � ` ai•� :i"s I:� '�'• : /!: .� Y'1:+1"N � 1"�•' 's I;r -
• � �
14
�S. Resolutia� No. -1990 ordet�ed the preliminarY P��.
s�ecificatians ar�d eski.mates of the c�osts thereof for the i.�wen�ents in
project.
�S, Resolution No. 1990 reoeived the Prelimir�ary �rgineerirrJ R�art
ar�d the petitiorLS for the iaQrovements in this pmject.
�AB, Resolutioci No. - 1990 ordered the i.�rat�snent ar�d fi.t�al plans ar�d
s�ecifications and estiYOatQS of aast foz the imprweqoertts in this project.
��� BE IT RESOLVID, by the City Qau�cil of the City of Fridley, Anaka
�Y. �ta as follaws:
1. TY�at th�e followir�g inQY,ov�ents P�o�ed bY C�ow�cil Resolutiori No. -
1990 are here],�y oYd�ered to be effect�ed and �ao�leted as soaz as �ly
po5sible, to-wit:
Street in�rove�nents, includiriq 9radin4. stabilized base, hat�ix bitwninaas mat,
�oncrete curb arid gutter, sidewalks, water and sanitaty sewier setvic�.s, storm
se�r sYste�, and other facilities located as follows:
�� .:� �i:
=i�� �,_r.:�;�• . .�� rnv_ a�:�.�u:�• •,. .,v.
That the ranrk involved in said iag�ve�ents as listed abave shall Y�x�eaftex be
designated as:
�1' II�i�VEN�Tl' P��7ECT �U. 8T. 1990 - 3
2. 2he plans arid specifications prepared by the Public Works De�arbm�t for
heretof�o,re��� arid each of thea puYSUant to the Oow�cil resolutior�s
a�ted, a oopy of �ich plans and specificati� are hereto
attacfieci and a�de a part the,t�eof, are he,t� appiroved at�d st�al.l be filed
with City Clerk.
The Public Works Director shall a000rdirygly prepare azd cause to be inserted in
the offici.al news�aper ' far bids i� the ��q of s�ich
unProv�nents wY3er such apQraved plans at�d specificatio�rls. Zt�e advertisement
shall be published for (3) three w�eeks (at least 21 days) , ar�d shali specify the
work to be done ar�d wi.11 stata ti�e bids will be apex�ed at�d ootZSidet�ed at 11:00
A.M. �1 � 1818 L�IY � JOLY, 1990, in the Cau�cil Ct�ambers of the City Hall ar�d
that rn bids will be oonsid�.red unless sealed ani filed with the Public Works
Director ani aooa�anied by a cash cle�osit, bid bcr�d, or oertified chec�Jc gayable
to the City for five peroerYt (5�) of the amowYt of s�x�t bid. �at the
advertisemeat for bids far� S�,T P1�ITDCT I�. ST. 1990 - 3 shall be
substarYtially in the standatd form.
RE50I�T�IC�i NO. - 1990
PAGE ZWO
''/:�� �� ��• • Y:�� �:IC M •��11 N� •1' �:I_ N •i' ' ��1 � Ir:� : : �: �'� •l"
11 I' ' �
WIL� J. I� - NAYCg2
��4�±�
SFIIRLE'Y A. HAAPAIA - CI'I'Y CLERK
14A
'�Engineerinc�
ISewer
Wa�er
Parks
Streets
Mamtenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager � PW90-231
FROMs John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Work DirectorM�
DATE: June 14, 1990
SIIHJECT: Water, Sanitary Sewer & Storm
Sewer Project No. 210
Attached are four (4) resolutions which create Water, Sanitary
Sewer and Storm Sewer Project No. 210 under which the utility work
needed for the development of seven (7) residential lots in the
Michael Servetus Addition and Michael Servetus 2nd Addition.
I am requesting that all four (4) resolutions be considered at one
(1) meeting in order to have construction completed this year. The
owners of the property that will benefit from these improvements
have waived the right to a public hearing.
The engineering estimate and fundinq source for each portion of the
project are:
Improvement Funding
Cost ourc
Water, Sanitary Sewer & .
Storm Sewer - 67th Avenue $66,000.00 Assessment
Watermain loop - oakley Dr. 10,000.00 Water Fund
Recommend the City Council consider and approve the four (4)
attached resolutions at the June 18, 1990, meetinq to create Water,
Sanitary Sewer, and Storm Sewer Project No. 210.
JGF/MAW/ts
Attachments
15
�
__ __ _ _ _ .
� ' � I � ....... --•--• .
.,......
h�•
•� K •.
. f t����� NN��II�I �
� �KOOAI,
t�. 1 t�• �,��K
����
� ����
I •• � -- —
� NM �
�
. � � �1 1� " ••.�f . Nl�.\ �
•
H�Op +t����l• •�.►��• tN���• � � �
. . . � �.. � � � � � �� � � .� � =- � � � � L � �
. � �.
� _ ...��
�
���J � IOCK E Ir PA R K ^ G~ Q n���ia i::.: : � _���'s �• `
�
, Q L � `' � :s � � � �
�' G �
C• ;,� � �
J x.� .... .
.
� �.., e••� j
� • � (1 v i
:I ;, C� ^ �� � �;. c . � 4 ... � 1
� � �
% �' i� � � .e... �
� � � ' •�O��OMC1 �K
�. , J G i� c C C. A t+ Q ""
.
�� n V L� tj �, � C? . L � �% t,1 �t
�
i �'� `vi �' J
n �.
.
, � c � � c ��, � .
� :, t,j V � �. •: � � _
- - -• t+- __ --,•;. cS u � �:r ;i �: r
;•� � • C+ % �. , t f
��� -��T• - -�. . . � •� ': i� �
+► •
0
♦� � ��� � ' *wlrf�
� • � — � � •o/l�
1 � �M00�� �
: a
.
• ,...�� /y •�.
� ' �
� ' �� �
�K..o. y t�w •
.
•
� � .
� i • ; � �.. . • ..
� � ' � �
� • ac
? � � � �a•
. .. ' � s
♦ • . J � �
• �
•�� ♦ • w � � ��t• �
� � -�.t•i..�»f �•s sre �
�,,1 ' �, ;'., i��� r 67TH AVENUE
.�� $ �4 � �...� . �, ......0
. :
.
1 � v _
�.� ��.. d �•/� t �
..�•w � t: V � �+ ' '" s.r�a. � �—=�T'; �
_� ��N_ '3�;,�,� n � ` `' _
� . .
�� �.y; � �.1 • � •
� � . � �
"! ♦ � �♦ f/ Mf�00MLNps M11K 3 t � � S
�y � ' ' ' � � '' OAKLEY DRIVE ' • � `
� YR ff/� . • ��
1 � �-1 • �..= � _ � � ;.
' �"► • 1 • � • � '� M
�a +--' —•-, ... . c.:.,. �
� ^ � �
_� _�' `
��� 1 j �' ' �
L �w.e .�1��-•�i
''����'.'i � 'I'i�
�T�f 1M
t
C
.
15B
R'F�OI,VrI�T �U. - 1990
•�:�, • � r •r��::,�• � � v:,� � �� ,. •� • ss�r v� r
�� sc � r� :�: •i- �:i: •�: r:��+•,:,�r ,.r• u:�• _•. � u. •a
:�s• i:�� •i•. :�s�v:�• •.• � , • �
rx�►, �, � rr �soLV� �i tne city va�cii of ti�e City of Fridley as
follcyws:
1. �at it appears in the iateres�ts of the city and of the property awners
affect,ed that there be oon�stnyctsd oertain imp�we�nents to-wit:
Stre�t in�rove�nents, iixludin4 9�v'�4, stabilized b�a�se, hat�tix bitwnir�aus mat,
oo�ncr�te curb ar�d gutter, sidewalks, water ar�d sanitary sewpr servioes, stoxm
sewer syst�n, ar�d ather facilities located as follcws:
67ZS AVENf� l�II(�ffi. SERVEl'� ADDITI�1
2. �at the PubliC Works Director, Jdui G. Flora, City Hall, FYidley,
Minnesata, is hereby authorized and direc.�ted to draw the preliminarY Plans ar�d
specifications atYi to tabulate the results of his estimates of the oosts of said
improvelnents, includir�g every itan of oost fram inoe.ptiori to va��pletiori and all
fees and ex�nses itxnlrred (or to be irxurred) in co�u�ectiort therewith, or the
firlaricir�g thereof, arid to mak�e a prelimin�rv report of his firrdings statiryg
th�erein whett�er said iag�rwemexrts are feasible arid wheti�er ti�ey can best be a�ade
as pr�o�ed, or in c�u�ection witn scme o�tryer i�roveqnents (ar�a the estimatea
cost as ), iricludit�q also a cie^�criptioc� of the lat�d.s or area as may
reoeive benefits th�erefran and as may be p�roposed to be as.ses.sed.
3. 'IY�at said pl�elimi nar js �prt shall be furnished to txie City oo�u�cil.
' _1�1� �� � � • ' Y:+�� Y:I: M •�'ll M� •I' 1r:1: M •1' ' �� �:� ; : �: �'� •1"
11 I' �
WII�.IAM J. NEE;� MAY�2
����
SHIf2T � A. F�ALA, QTY CCII2R
12�O�IQiT �UU. - 1990
•i:r_ • � • . •�:,�:,i � � e �:�: •�:,� � �� � •a v:,�• ��•� �
'1'rN:� ' � t •' i� '.I. r � t �:1� • Il:i :i:t+• ' ■ f • ,
�:I: I• ✓1' •I" Y:1: ••� �_ Y'il • . •i' M:�I'�V� �. � 1' '�• � ;r I;N
../� Y�' ��. 1 Y� '♦ :1's"1:�1' •1'. 71;n"I:+�' ' • , • �
�8, Re�olutian No. -1990 a�3ered the prelimir�arY Plarss, specificatians
arid esti.mates of the oosts theseof for the i���ts in thi.s p�oj ect.
�2EAS, the ooa�structioci of oertain inQ�rwe�ents is d�ed tfl be in ti�e int�rest
of the City of Fridley arxi the property awners affec,-ted thex,eby.
�►. �, e� rr RF�oLVED by the city ao�u�cil of the city of Frialey as
follvws:
1. Zi�at the preliTMir,ari � sui�itted by the Public Wbrlcs Directflr,
is hereby reoeived ar�d aooepted.
2. Zhat the City C1erk shall act to asoertain the na�e and ad�dr�ss of
the avt�er of ea�d1 paroel of lat�d directly affected o� within the
area of lat�ds as may be pra�osed to be assessed for said
improv�ts, ar�d calculate estimates of assessmerits as may be
pz�ed rplative ti�ereto aqainst eac3i of said lands.
3. ZlZat the area px�aposed to be asses.sed for said i�rwe�nents ar�d each
of them as r�at.ed in said natioe are all the lar�d.s arid areas as r�ated
in said riatioe: All of the same t� be asses.Sed propattianately
ac�cordiriq to the benefits reoeived.
4. �hat the estimates of assessmerYts of the City Clerk shall be
available for inspecticn to the dwner of any paroe,l of lar�d as may
be affec�ted thereby.
5. Zi�at all PmpextY aat�ers wiiose pr+ap�x ty is liable to be assessed
with the makirg of the in�rweqnents have sigt�ed an aqr+ee�t
�tir�cl the i�arovesnents ar�d oanstitute 100 peroe.nt of the
P�rtY awr�ers who will benefit frcm the improvement and do waive
the ric�t tfl a public hearinq which is a1ldw�ed �u�der tiye r�orn�al
Px�ooec�ures set forth in Mitu�ta Statutes Cl�ap�t�r 429.
� �1:r� �� � �• ' II;N� Ir:l: M •��11 M� •I' �:C N •I' • ��1 : �:� _ : �: �'� •I'
11 I" • �
WILLIAM J. NEE - I�YOIt
ATI�:S'I':
�rurFV A. HAAPALA - CITY C�
16
16A
June 12, 1990
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Fridley
6431 University Ave., N.E.
Fridley, I�i 55432
PW90-149
The Michael Servetus Unitarian Society, beinq the owners of certain
property in the northwest quarter of Section 13, Township 30 North,
Range 24 West, described as Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and Outlot A of Michael
Servetus Addition in Fridley; hereby requests that the City of
Fridley initiate the followir►g improvements to the properties this
year:
1. Extend 67th Avenue approximately 280 feet west with a 30-foot
wide (face to face) bituminous roadway with concrete curb and
gutter.
2. Extend the existing sanitary sewer line in 67th Avenue with •�
seven (7) appropriate service connections, approximately 280
feet west.
3.
4.
Extend the existinq 6-inch waterline in 67th Avenue, with
seven (7j appropriate service connections, approximately 250
west.
Install storm water drainage facilities as necessary.
The Michael Servetus Unitarian Society aqrees to the assessment of
all costs relatinq to the above improvements against Lots 5, 6, 7
and 8, Michael Servetus Addition and Lots 1, 2, and 3 of the
proposed Michael Servetus 2nd Addition. Each lot to be assessed
an equal amount. It is our understandinq that the estimated
improvement cost is $116,000.00.
Additionally, the Michael Servetus Unitarian Society waives its
riqht to a public hearinq on the assessment of the requested
improvements. ,
�
for the
Unitarian Soc
��� �� _ � � �
� �
��� � ��
. ,�.r- �.
RF�OI�I'IQ�T )D. - 1990
'I:r; • 1 •' •1'U':rl' � t � 1' '-� • :r I:r '�� ' � �• '�
� JM�` �+• �'. �� 1� .l; � I• .l: �I� ���; �iIJI�IJ�I. ..� 1i:+1.
:�� .1 V� '♦ .I;n"I:�I' i� •1'. :1;r"I il• '�• ' • �
�8� ReSOlutiori No. - 1990 o1�clet�ed ti]e prpliminans plaT3s�
specifications atxi esti.mates of the vosts th�e.reof for the improveroerYts in this
Px'o7�.
�,s, �esolution xo. -1990 reoeivirx� the �re�.�mina� r�o�t ar�a
reoeivir�g petitior� to waive the public hearinq a► the matter of the
�onstnictiaz of oertain i.mprov�ents for thi.s project.
�,8, oertain ag�tts reg�estin4 street i�rove�ents, includir�4 9�.
stabilized ba.se, hat�.x bit�nnir�aus mat, sewps, water, stoxm sew�er ani other
facilities, located as follaas:
6�TH AVII�
� «:�� :� _,:�• • - ��_ � .. . ,
w�ere duly preserited to the Cb�mcil on the 18th day of Jiu�e, 1990; and
rx�, �, B8 IT 1�80LVED by the City �rcil of the City of Fridley, Ar�oxa
C7auYty, Mi�ata, as follaas:
1. 'Il�e Cau�cil firr3s ar�d c3etermit�es that said agre�m�ents w�ere
signed by all c�wners of real praperty abuttir�g t� the street(s)
named as the locatioc� of the in�rove�ne,rYt.
2. S�i i�rove�ner�ct is 2�ereby oYdered as prc�osed in the Cau�cil
Resoluti�'1 No. -1990 ac�op�ted Jtu�a 18, 1990.
3. John G. Flora is hereby designated as the er�gir�eer for this
i.�rov�t. He shall Pre�re Plans and specificatior�s and estimates of
oosts thereof for the makir�q of surh inp�rovemer�ts.
_ ti�. �� .• •�. r:i: w s• �i wr •i� r:r. w .r - n �:� : : �: .• •i�
�i i- • �
wrrJT�t J. NEE - I�Y�2
�y►�
`1 � P /• • • M M �'J
17
�
�1TI�D�T �A. - 1990
'1l' � 1 1 • . • '� � :il � � f / 1' ' � � s I � I � � � • I � �
•�'��:A' �,f �•:�I'� _I? I:r "��• : ��: r- Y:AC '�. � V,'� :1=..�i/•
•�'�, ]1}'�1:�' ' • " . • �
1�s, �esolutian No. -1990 a�dered the p�+eliminarY Plans, specificatiac�
and esti.mates of ti�e oosts thereof fcr the inQ�ovements in p�aject, ar�d
�S Itesoluticn No. 1990 reoeiv+ed t2'ie Prel;,n; t,arv g�qj�er�9 g�o�t
aad the�pe�titions far th�e i�YVV�tts in this p�oject, at�d
1�8, Iaesa2uticn No. - 1990 a�der+e�d the impz�v�t�t and final plans ar�d
specificatiar�s arxi esti.mates of cost fa� the iu�arovements in this p�oject.
�711, �, BS 2T REBOLVED by the Oouncil of the City of FYidley, Anal�
Qo�uitY, Mirnesata, as follaas:
1. Zhat the following improvem�nts PropoEed bY C�amcil R�olutiar�;
are i�erei�y o�dered to be effect,ed ard aatpleted as soori as
�soc�ably possible, to-wit:
S'tre�et inQrvv�errts, i.naludit�q gzadirx�, stabilized ba.Se, hat�ix
bit�inau.s mat, concr�ts airb arid gutter, side�ralks, water arid
sanitary sew�.r sexvices, stozm sewer systa�, ani vth�r facilities
located as follcws:
�: � r ���: . �:► :,� :�:�• � - ��_ .. .
�hat the werk involved in said inQxw�ts as listred abwe shall hereafter be
designated as:
►:►� :�I• ;,. � y. •, :,_ . :�+• � ,�. ., �1�Y :,J .!�• �-. J • S�
2. TlIE p13I15 3I9�d SPAC1f1Cdt1C[18 jaY12'j�3Y� bj� t2'IL� R]b21C WOZ'kS
n�3,-f,�„} for ax3i iaQrvve�esxts arid eac3i of them, pursuant to the
Ua�mcil resolutia� heretofore adaptsd, are herP17Y aPPr'w� �
sha12 be filed with the City Clerk.
Zhe Public Works Direc.-tar st�all a000�d.in�ly pz��e ar�d cause to be insert�ed in
the official r�paper fa� bids upoci the makinq of such
iaQrove�e.rYts und�s such app�wed pl.ar�s ani specifications. �e adveitis�ent
shall be published for three (3) weeks (at least 21 days) , arrl sha11 specifY the
wurk to be dor�e ar�d will state that bids will be ap�s�ed ar�d vo�idered at 11:00
a.m. a� tba 18th dap oi Jt�ly, 1990, in ttye Oau�cil ��ra of the City Hall,
arid that no bids will be oonsidered unless sealed ar�d filed with the Public
Warks Director, at�d acoo�anied by a cash c'i�osit, bid ba�d, ar certified ci�ecJc
gayable to the City for five peroent (5$) of the aaro�urt of axii bi.d. �at the
advertisanent fo� bids fos 1�lTEEt, S�II'l�t �� 8'1� B�WF�[t PAOJDGT �D. 210
shall be substarYtially in starraard foYm.
Re�.,olutian No. - 1990
� �
' ]/:r� �� �• • Y:r� �:C M •� �i M• �I' �:C M •I- • ��1 : �:� _ : �: �•� •1-.
�� I' • �
WII��AM J. I�E - I�C�2
ATI�T:
y ��' /• • M M �'J /
: �1
�
� FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL 71PPOI1dTKENT6
�� . June 18, 1990
me
Mary
Smith
Douglas
Himango
Bruce
Koopmeiners
Position
Assessment
Clerk
Grade D
Step 2
Non-exempt
Public
Services
Worker
A-1
Non-exempt
PubliC
Services
Worker
A-1
Non-exempt
Startinq
Sala�y
$1,651.26
per month
$19,815.12
per year
$9.62
per hour
$20,086.56
per year
$9.62
per hour
$20,086.56
per year
Jeffrey Police $1,932.00
Potter Officer per month
Partial- $23,184.00
exempt per year
Startinq
Date Replaces
June 19, Ferne
1990 McCarthy
June 19, James
1990 Brindley
June 20, Chester
1990 Swanson
June 19, Robert
1990 Friegang
20
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
June I8, 1990
�pe of License: B�
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
Moore Lake Racquet, Swim Same
& He�al th C1 ub
1200.E. Moore Lk.Dr.
Fridley, Mn. 55432
FOOD VEHICLE �
Mr. H's P1ini Doughnuts Harold Hotchkiss
1055 PJ. Circle N,E. �
Fridley, Mn. 55432
GAMBLING
Fridley Metro Golden David Gilbert
Lions Club
6085 - 7th St. NE,
Fridley, Mn, 55432
PEDDLER
Matt Milner Sales Gerald B. Johnson
1293 - 52nd Ave. N.E.
Fri dl ey, P1n. 55421
PUBLIC DRIPJKING
Knights of Columbus John M. Yencho
6831 Hv�y 65 N. E.
Fridley,Mn. 55432
CHARITABLE ORGRNIZATION SOCICTOR
MPIRG(Mpls. Pub. Interest Group) ,�na Micka
921 Islehart St.
St.Paul, P•1n. 55104
Approved By:
LICEHSEd
Fees:
$37.50
$50.00
James P. Hill Asking fees to be
Publich Safety waived
Director
James P. Hill �60.00
Publich Safety Director
James P. Hill $300.00
Public Safety Director
James P. Hill Asking Fees to
Public Safe�v Dir, be waived
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
ELECTRICAL
DeVice Electric
1828 Jersey Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55426
Darrell Vice
Maple Grove Heating & A/C Inc.
8870 Zea2and Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, 1�IIJ 55445 Steve MacDonald
Service Electric Inc.
171 Rickard Road N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
EXCAVATIN(i
Bruhn Excavations
1698 Belvidere
St. Paul, MN 55107
Dennis Wood
Kenneth Bruhn
GAS SERVICES
Economy Gas Installers Inc.
6204 France Avenue South
Edina, MN 55410 James Toohey
Jake's Service
8465 Center Drive N.E.
Spring Lake Park, rIIJ 55432 Jake Pyles
Mechanical Building Services Inc.
13355 Staple Street N.E.
Ham Lake, MN 55303 Cecil SeaZs
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
Alcar Builders
5131 Overlook Drive
Bloomington, MN 55437
Construct-AlI Corporation
4401 - 85th Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, MN 55443
Albert Carr
Terrence Brelje
Construction Analysis & Management, Inc.
7401 Central Avenue N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55432 Vergil Florhaug
Deck Specialist
1238 Wachtler Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
�,
Dan Caruso
LZC�NBEB
STATE OF MINN
Same
Same
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldg Ofcl.
CLYDE WILEY
Bldg/Mech Insp.
Same
Same
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Same ,
Same
Same
21A
Hanggi Building & Remodelinq
2901 - 85th Avenue N.E.
Blaine, MN 55434 Kenneth Hanggi
Home Enhancers Inc. �
5460 - 145th Street West
Savage, i�IIJ 55378
Mann's Pools
5425 - 165th Street N.
Hugo, I�T 55038 Kevin Mann
Rain-Lite Inc.
4357 Dunrovin Lane
Eagan, MN 55123 Eddy Manthei
Jerry Thell Builders
17020 Crocus Street N.W.
Anoka, MN 55303 Jerry Thell
Wescot Construction & Dev. Inc.
85 East County Road B
Little Canada, MN 55117 Scott Wesch
HEATING
Collova HVAC
3064 Labore Road
Little Canada, MN 55109
Carmelo Collova
Jakes Service
8465 Center Drive N.E.
Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 Jake Pyles
Mechanical Building Services Inc.
13355 Staple Street N.E.
Ham Lake, MN 55303 Cecil Seals
PLIIMBING
Aqua City Plumbing Inc.
5428 Nicollet Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55419
DMC Plumbing Services Inc.
P.O. Box 41974
Plymouth, NIIJ 55441
Donohue Mechanical Inc.
6115 Sunnyfield Road
Mound, MN 55364
ROOFINC3
AWR Inc.
3023 Snelling Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55406
Dave Vogelgesang
George Huff
Tom Donahue
21B
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
CLYDE WILEY
Bldg/Mech Insp.
Same
Same
STATE OF MINN
Same
Same
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldg Ofcl.
John Jarvi Construction
240 Longfellow Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
WRECRINti
Herbst & Sons
2299 County Raad H
Moundsview, MN 55112
John Jarvi
Dennis Herbst
21C
Same
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldq Ofcl.
APPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION HUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
� ,:,:
,,
�Y
'�
�
CIlYOf
FRlDLEY
FOR CONCIIRRENCE BY THE CITY COIINCIL
AEC Engineers & Designers
511 - 11th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
JIINE 18, 1990
EBTIMATEB
1. Phase I- 3 MG Concrete
Reservoir Repair Project
No. 192
(Inspection Services)
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,837.00
2. 1.5 MG Concrete Reservoir
Repair Project No. 193
(53rd Avenue and Johnson Street)
(Inspection Services)
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,000.00
Gammon Bros., Inc.
13845 Northdale Boulevard
Rogers, MN 55374
Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2
Estimate No. 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 34, 347.49
Walbon Lawn Maintenance
3225 Skycroft Drive
St. Anthony, MN 55418
Corridor Maintenance
Project No. 199
Estimate No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4, 342.86