The URL can be used to link to this page

07/09/1990 - 4973WILLIAM W. HIIRNB CITY MANAaSR COUNCIL iiE�TINQ .TIILY 9, 1990 FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1�$TING, JIILY 9, 1990 Page 2 PIIBLIC HEARZ1�iG: Amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District) and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) � of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance, by Adding Language Regarding Lot Coverage Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1D � .� v Amending Sections 205.03.55, 205.09.05, 205.17.05, 205.18.05, and 205.22.06 of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance to Permit Nine Foot Wide Parking Stalls in Certain � Districts, and to Require Parking Spaces to be Double-Striped . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2G �cJ'" , � � Issuing an On-Sale Beer License to �� Nicki's Tap Located at 5895 University "� Avenue N.E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3A �" ^ � �� (� � OLD BIISINESB: �'� � Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend the City Co e of the City / _ of Fridley, Minnesota, by Making a Change in Zoning Districts . � . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4B U' FRIDLEY CITY CO�I�iCIL KEETING, JIILY 9, 1990 Paqe 3 OLD BOSINEBS (CONTINQED): Commission Vacancy for City Council Consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 � U � �TS11 BIISINE88: First Reading of an Ordinance �JO Recodifying the Fridley City ��`r�� Code, Chapter 205, Entitled � �% � "Zoning," by Amending �� Sections 205.17.03 and 205.18.03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6B First Reading of an Ordinance �� Recodifying the Fridley City ,�� ' Code, Chapter 205, Entitled p� � "Zoning," by Amending 1 Sections 205.03.55, 205.09.05, 205.17.05, 205.18.05, and 205.22.06 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7B First Reading of an Ordinance _ Recodifying the Fridley City � , Code, Chapter 108, Entitled � "Fire Prevention," by Repealing � � � the Existing Chapter 108, in �, � its Entirety and Adding a New � / Chapter 108, and Further Amending Chapter 11, Entitled "Fees" . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8R / Resolution to the Rice Creek � � Watershed District to Improve I/`� Locke Lake . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. 9 - 9A F�IDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING, JIILY 9, 1990 NE1/ BOSIN888 (CONTINIIED): Paqe 4 Resolution Against the Issuance �/ of a Gambling License for the p,-i,�' Children's Heart Fund Within the �fj' George's in Fridley Resta ant . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - l0A "� � �� Resolution Against the Issuance of a Gambling License for the / Children's Heart Fund Within the Shorewood Inn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . il � �� Motion to Approve the 199�-1995 Capital Improvement Plan . a . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 l� � L � Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 20, 1990 . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13JJ A. Special Use Permit, SP #90-09, by Leffel Incorporated for Maaco Auto Painting and Bodyworks, to Allow Exterior Storage of Materials and Equipment on Lot 2, Block 4, Commerce Park, and that Part of Lot 2 Lying in Section 10-30-24, Subject to Utility and Gas Easements as Shown on Plat and Subject to any Other Easements of Record, Generally Located at 100 Osborne Road N.E. .......... .......... 13J - 13M 130 - 13V 1�V 1 ry� � FRIDI,$Y CITY COIINCIL 1SEETING, JIILY 9, 1990 NEW BDSINE88 (CONTINIIED): Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 20, 1990, (Continued): B. Resolution Authorizing Agreements Between the City of Fridley and � Recipients of 1990 Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds for Human Services Organizations ....... 13M ....... 13W - 13JJ � � �� Receive an Item from the l�inutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of June 19, 1990 . . . . . . . . . . . Paqe 5 . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14K A. Variance, VAR #90-10, by - Robert and Sandra Schmidt, to Reduce the Side Yard Setback on a Corner Lot from 17.5 Feet to 15.5 Feet, to Allow the Construction of Additional Living Space on Lot 6, Block 3, Bonny Addition, the Same Being 6001 Fourth Street N.E. � �� Variance Extension Request, VAR #88-06, by Wayne Johnson, to Reduce the Rear Yard Setback from 3 Feet to 1 Foot, and to Reduce the Side Yard Setback from 5 Feet to 3 Feet, to Allow the Construction of a Three-Car Garage on Lots 25 and 26, Block 5, Hyde Park Addition, the Same Being 6051 Third Street N.E. . . . . . . . . . � <� . . . . . . . . 15 - 15A FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL !L$$TINQ� JIILY 9� 1990 �W BII8INE88 (CONTINIIED�: Nuisance Abatement at 501 Glencoe Street N . E . . . . . . . . . . . . Establish a Public Hearing for Establishing a New Tax Increment Financing District No. li for the Redevelopment of the Northeast Quadrant of University Avenue and Mississippi Street . . . . . . . . Establish a Public Hearing for � the Issuance of Revenue Bonds, Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, for the Long Term Care Foundation . . . . . Paqe 6 . . . . . . . . 16 /2� / . . . . . . 17 - 17B � �✓ . � Q / F�I � JF'_/ . . . . . . . . 18 - 18B � � �� Approval of Change Order No. 1 for Construction of the 1.5 MG Elevated Water Reservoir Project No. 201 ... lq�% � Approval of Chan� Order No. 3 for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1 & 2 . . . . . . . . . �� .�� /. . . . 19 - 19B �� -6 � � / � . . . . . . . . . 20 - 208 FRIDLEY CZTY CODNCIL KE$TING, JQLY 9, 1990 page 7 NEW BIISINEBB (CONTINII$D): Approval of the 1990 School � District Referendum Levy ,�; � � Agreements for Independent �.�N �� School District Nos. 11, 13, � 14 and 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21HH Approval of the 1990 - 1991 - y/ Contract with the Twin City Area Urban Corps . . . . . . . . . �. . . . �. . . 2 2 - 2 2 C / Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 � �Q � � .� ;�` � 2°� c , � w �� Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 - 24D l � � Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 � /V d liDJOIIRN: TH$ 1[I�OTBB OF TSB FRIDLEY CITY COIIl1CIL �[8$TI�TG OF JONI! 18, 1990 T8$ KINIITBB OF TH$ R$GIILAR M8$TING OF T8$ FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL OF JIINE 18. 1990 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Nee. -�-. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billings MEMBERS ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING. JUNE 4, 1990: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: The following estimate was added: Modern Heating and Air Conditioning in the amount of $2,295.00. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM. VISITORS: SWEARING-IN OF POLICE OFFICER. JEFFREY POTTER: Mr. James Hill, Public Safety Director, introduced Fridley's new Police Officer, Jeffrey Potter. He stated that Mr. Potter attended school in St. Paul, the University of Minnesota, Duluth, and graduated from Lakewood Community College with a degree in law enforcement. Mr. Hill also stated that Jeff was employed with the City as a Community Service Officer and will replace Officer Friegang. Mr. Hill administered the Oath of Office to received congratulations from the City Council Officer .Potter who on his appointment. FRZDLBY CITY COQNCIL 1�BTING OF JIINB 18. 1990 PAG$ 2 KENNETH WILRINSON ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF: Mr. Wilkinson, Anoka County Sheriff, stated that he appreciated the opportunity to appear before the Council for the -purpose of continuinq communications between his department- and the communities in which they serve. He stated that their annual report is nearing completion, and the Council will receive a formal report of the activities for 1989. Mr. Wilkinson stated that from his perspective, the working relationship between the Sheriff's Department and the City of Fridley is excellent. He stated that Jim Hill has one of the more progressive police forces in the area. Mr. Wilkinson stated that in the area of criminal investigations, the Fridley Police Department conducts most of the investigations of these crimes. He stated that there were 173 felony and gross misdemeanor cases in 1989 which was down slightly from 1988. He stated that the number of criminal sexual assault cases County-wide has declined from last year. He stated that in 1989, there were 35 compared with 46 in 1988. Mr. Wilkinson stated that druq activity is increasinq and, because of cooperative efforts, there has been success in this area. He stated that the County made 103 drug related arrests, and they have seized cocaine, opium, heroine, marijuana, and amphetamines. He stated that throuqh March of this year, the druq unit made 30 arrests and conducted il search warrants involving cocaine, marijuana, and amphetamines. He stated that their department has followed up on 37 druq related leads. Mr. Wilkinson stated that there was a case involving gambling, and a Fridley resident was arrested for sports boolanaking and $170,000 in assets was seized. He stated that the polygraph is now a reality, and Anoka County has been providing this service since July, 1989. He stated that prior to this time, the only way local law enforcement agencies could obtain polyqraph service was throuqh a private vendor which was quite costly. He stated that the polygraph was used in a Fridley child abuse case that brought about a confession from one of the parents. He stated that the polygraph also resulted in a confession from a suspect in a theft case. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Sheriff's Department provides on-call crime lab services and assisted with a search warrant where pornographic material was collected. He stated that they have also assisted with a suicide investiqation and an armed robbery line-up in which the suspect was found guilty. _ Mr. Wilkinson stated that the County provides jail facilities and booked 8,400 persons in 1989 which was an increase from 7,600 in 1988. He stated that the Fridley Police Department contributes about 16 percent of those persons being booked. Mr. Wilkinson stated that arrest warrants are increasinq. When he took office, there were about 8,000. They now have over 12,500 arrest warrants. FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEBTINa OF JUN$ 18, 1990 PAGB 3 Mr. Wilkinson stated that a new service is the canine unit. This unit has been assisting many of the police departments, but did not provid� service to Fridley in 1989. He stated that the SWAT team is aYso available to assist local law enforcement agencies when need�d. Iie stated that this service was used last year in Fridley, and a suspect was arrested and charqed with aggravated assault. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the County now has a computer on board and, hopefully, statistics can be provided in a more timely manner. Mayor Nee stated that he was very impressed with the improvements in the Sheriff's Department since Mr. Wilkinson has been in office. Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Wilkinson has brought a degree of professionalism to the Sheriff's Department that was really needed. Mr. Hill, Public Safety Director, stated that Sheriff Wilkinson has done a tremendous job in accomplishing the needed improvements in the Sheriff's Department. He stated that the Police Chiefs in the County are extremely satisfied with the coordination and cooperation received from the Sheriff's Department. LOCKE LAKE - MARY VASECKA, 6909 HICKORY DRIVE: Ms. Vasecka, 6909 Hickory Drive, asked about the condition of the dam at Locke Lake and if it was repairable. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a portion of the southwest wing wall had collapsed so some work was done by introducing some filter fabric and large riprap material. He stated that the dam is repairable, but if the dam cannot be secured, it could become more expensive to repair. Ms. Vasecka asked the costs to repair the dam versus the cost to replace it. Mr. Flora stated that the cost for repair would be about $100,000 versus a replacement cost of about $250,000. He stated that if the dam was replaced it would allow for a better drainage structure for the lake and some recreational improvements including a canoe portage. Ms. Vasecka asked if soil borings had been taken. Mr. Flora:stated that they are waiting for drier weather before taking the_soil borings. Ms. Vasecka asked if there were any proposals this evening for Locke Lake. $RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 18. 1990 PAGE � Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that he has submitted a memo to Council and made certain recommendations. He stated that he has completed the legal research and, basically, he advised Council to petition the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) under Chapter 112 and urqe the RCWD to complete their 509 Plan and get it approved by the State Board. He suggested that staff review the 509 Plan as it applies to Locke Lake to determine if there are any suggestions for amendments prior to the time it is adopted by the State Board. He stated that he is also recommending council request the RCWD to pay for engineering costs. He suggested that the cost of the project be shared by the City; County and, hopefully, by some State funding; special assessments against benefitted properties; and ad valorem monies that the RCWD may have by direct authority through Chapter 112 or Chapter 473. Mr. Herrick felt the next step is for staff to make recommendations to Council on the cost sharing which he understands will be done. He stated that he believed John Flora has a meeting scheduled with the RCWD engineers where, possibly, some of these items could be discussed. Ms. Vasecka stated that she understands there are several deadlines that need to be met as far as the ad valorem and questioned if there is a time frame in which to submit the petition. Mr. Herrick stated that the petition can be submitted by mail to the Rice Creek Watershed District. He felt it may be possible to • complete the petition within a month. However, it is a lengthy process to determine what should be included in the petition. He also stated input is needed from Council on the City�s commitment and what portions may be assessed to the benefited properties. He stated that, if at all possible, the City should know the amount of participation from the County and State. Ms. Vasecka asked the amount spent on weed removal in Moore Lake. Mr. Flora stated that the work completed at Moore Lake consisted oi some drainage ditch diversion, ponding, harvesting of weeds, placement of a liner, pier construction, and treatment and aeration of the water. He stated that the total cost was about $1,000,000. Mayor Nee stated that the Locke Lake issue has not formally been submitted to the Council. He stated that City staff is working on the problem, but nothing has been formally presented as an agenda item for the Council's action. He stated that to discuss this item at every meeting is not the manner in which it should be handled. Ms. Vasecka asked if property owners were assessed for any of the improvements to which Mr. Flora answered in the affirmative. Councilman Schneider stated that the City's portion_ was about $300,000 through a storm water assessment. He stated that he understands the Locke Lake residents' concerns. However, at every FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEBTINa OF JIINS 18. 1990 PAGS 5 meetinq the Council is spending an hour before the meeting discussing this item. He stated that Council is working to try and solve the problem, but felt they are beinq cross-examined at every meetinq. Ms. Vasecka_stated that she felt they were not gettinq concrete answers. She suqgested a conference meeting with residents and the Council. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that when this issue is ready to be presented to the Council it will be placed on the agenda. She stated that Council is trying to resolve the problem as soon as possible. However, there is other business in the City which they must conduct. Ms. Vasecka stated that she was not familiar with the format. However, residents on Locke Lake have been waiting since 1972, and that is the reason they will be present at every meeting. She stated that if it is a month, they are willing to wait, but she was told it is a top priority item for the City. She stated that, as residents, they want to know what they should be doing to insure something is done and that it is not a forgotten issue. Councilman Schneider stated that discussions are needed to determine how to deal with the problem. He felt the action of the Council on this issue will probably set a precedent for dealing with all lakes in the City. He also felt that there needed to be some consistency but agreed the Locke Lake situation is critical at this time. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if it would be reasonable to expect the petition to be drafted for the Council meeting on July 23. Mr. Herrick felt that this would be reasonable. He stated that the mechanics are quite simple, but what should be contained in the petition, particularly any proposals as far as financinq, will have to be determined by Council. He stated that alternatives may need to be explored that would affect the time for finalizinq the petition. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there is a need to complete the engineering, and it is difficult for the Council to make recommendations until this is done. He felt some preliminary engineering should probably be completed before any specific recommendations could be submitted. Mr. Herrick stated that the question is if this engineering work needs to be completed before the petition is filed and, if so, would Cit�-staff or a consultant do the preliminary enqineering work and submit estimates of the cost. FRIDLEY CITY COQNCIL l[88TING OF JIINE 18, 1990 PAG$ 6 Mr. Burns stated that, hopefully, some of these issues would be discussed when John Flora meets with the engineers of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Mayor Nee stated that a format needs to be presented to discuss the strategy. He stated that he did not know if it is reasonable to separate the dam, drainage, and sedimentation issues of the project. He also stated that in looking at the financing, it may have to be determined which is the priority item and each reviewed separately. Mayor Nee stated that he was sorry for the Locke Lake residents� frustration, but it is not possible to discuss the issue when it is discussed as an open forum item. He stated that the issue needs to be presented as a formal agenda item so the Council will have information available on which to base their action. ROXANNE BAKER. THREE-IN-ONE: Ms. Baker stated that she was a member of the Anoka County Communications Workshop and requested permission to hold a live telethon for muscular dystrophy on Labor Day. She stated that the ETC Board of Directors have given their approval providing permission is obtained from the Council, Fire and Police Departments, Nortel Cable, the Cable Television Commission, area businesses, and residents. She stated that the Assistant Police Chief said he would help them with their plans, and area residents have signed statements concurring with their plans. Councilman Billings suggested to Ms. Baker that she work with City staff on their plans in order to comply with the City Code and ordinances. He stated that if there are any problems, these would be brought to the Council's attention. � Mayor Nee requested that a letter be submitted on what they are proposing. PUBLIC HEARING: 1. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR A REZONING RE UEST. ZOA #90-02 BY FRIDLEY TOWN SOUARE ASSOCIATES: Mayor Nee re-opened the public hearing that had been continued from the June 4, 1990 Council meeting. He stated that the hearing had been continued in order to receive further input regarding the Anoka County Railroad Authority's plans for this site. Mr. Paul McCarron, Anoka County Commissioner and Chairman of the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority (ACRRA), stated that he sent a letter on June 14 addressed to Mayor Nee regarding the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority's intentions. He stated that the ACRRA has been working with the City to analyze potential light FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEBTINQ OF JDNS 18. 1990 PAGS 7 rail transit station locations at Mississippi Street. He stated that this station will provide access from the Fridley area to the regional LRT system and improve transit service to the entire Fridley ar�a. Commissioner McCarron stated that the propased LRT track location is on the east side of University Avenue. He stated that at City staff's request, the ACRRA has been working with the City and the developer to identify a station location and design in the northeast quadrant that can accommodate the functional needs of the LRT station without conflicting with private development opportunities. He stated that they are also analyzing the potential for a LRT station and parkinq in the southeast quadrant of the University/Mississippi intersection. He stated that although a final decision of whether or not a LRT station will be located in the Mississippi area will not be made for several months, he wanted to assure the Council that it is the ACRRA's intent to follow the request and wishes of the City Council. Commissioner McCarron stated that he would like to clarify the ACRRA's actions to date regarding the Mississippi station. He stated that the City requested that the Railroad Authority consider the alternatives that would have the least impact on the City and school district. He stated that, after analyzinq the various alternatives, the Railroad Authority voted to authorize the Railroad Authority Chairman to enter into negotiations for the acquisition of an easement that would include 21 feet of the northeast quadrant. He stated that this option would provide approximately 31 parking spaces and a drop-off area for buses and vehicles. He stated that the Railroad Authority is only considering a drop-off area for buses and vehicles and some limited parking, should a LRT station be located in the northeast quadrant. Mayor Nee stated that this was his understanding of the Railroad Authority's plans and thanked Mr. McCarron for this information. Councilman Billings stated that Mr. McCarron's statement provides assurances to residents in the neighborhood. He stated that the eight homes that were once being considered for a LRT park-and-ride site are in Commissioner McCarron's district so he is not only speakinq as Chairman of the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority, but as their County Commissioner. Commissioner McCarron stated that his primary job is performinq his duties as a County Commissioner, and he would not jeopardize this position by removing eight homes. Mr. Jack Kirkham, 430 - 67th Avenue, stated that all the residents in the area bought their homes thinkinq they had protection under the City's zoninq ordinance. However, the code does provide that a person may apply for a rezoning. He stated that to his knowledge most of the residents, except those who have a vested interest, are FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL XEETINa OF JIINB 18. 1990 PAQE 8 opposed to this rezoning. He submitted a petition in opposition to the rezoning and the removal of any homes for LRT. MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive Petition No. 10-1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jack Kirkham, 430 - 67th Avenue, questioned the assurances they have received in regard to removal of any homes. Mayor Nee stated that nothing is absolute. He stated that he did not believe that anyone could promise that years down the road something like this may happen. Mr. Kirkham stated that he was concerned about one or two years from now. Councilman Billings stated that at the earliest, a LRT system would be operable in about seven years. He stated that in discussions with Commissioner McCarron and the LRT Technical Advisory Committee, they concurred they would support the City's position that there would be no park-and-ride on the northeast corner of Mississippi and University, and the homes between 66th and 67th Avenues would not be removed to make way for the LRT system. He stated that in the future years there may be a different concern, and Council cannot control a future Council's action. Mr. Kirkham, Jr. stated that he wanted to know if the residents are protected by Council if, in the future, the Railroad Authority decided they wanted the property. Mayor Nee stated that he felt the history of the Council has been not to agree to condemnation of residents' property against the wishes of the owners. He stated that the Railroad Authority has stated they would not do anything against the Council's wishes. Commissioner McCarron stated that the Railroad Authority would not do anything the City does not want done. He stated that once the LRT system is built, it would be turned over to the MTC for operation. He stated that under current law, the ACRRA will still maintain control over acquisition of capital fixtures such as land and buildings. He stated that as a matter of policy, the ACRRA is going to concede to the wishes of the City. He stated that he cannot control wiiat may be done in the future, but believed the same rationale would be followed. Mr. Thomson, 411 67th Avenue, stated that he viewed LRT as a positive issue for the future. He stated that he would like Commissioner McCarron to share options other than the drop-off at Mississippi and University. FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEBTING OF JIINE 18, 1990 PAa$ 9 Commissioner McCarron stated that there were a variety of options, one being the Columbia Arena site. He stated that site was not favorable because of the kinds of traffic patterns. He stated that another alternative site is in the southeast quadrant of Mississipgi and University, and this option has not been discarded. Mr. Thayer, 377 - 66th Avenue, asked if any study has been done on whether the large trailer trucks will be able to maneuver around this facility and if there is adequate clearance. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, reviewed the radius proposed and stated that there was adequate room to maneuver these trucks. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that there are certain standards for truck movements, and he assumes the developer's architect used the template criteria. Mr. Schuette, UCD, stated that their architect used figures and templates to establish the radius accepted in the industry. He stated that the design was based on established parameters. No other persons spoke regarding this proposed rezoning request. MOTION by Councilman Billings to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:54 p.m. OLD BUSINESS: 2. ORDINANCE NO. 948 UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SAI,� THEREOF: MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 948 and adopt it on the second readinq and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee deciared the motion carried unanimously. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 949 UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C O�' THE CITY CODE: MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the second readinq of Ordinance:No. 949 and adopt it on the second readinq and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL l[$$TING OF JDNB 18. 1990 PAG$ 10 NEW BUSINESS: 4. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A REZONING. ZOA #90- 02. BY FRIDLEY TOWN SOUARE ASSOCIATES: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that the S-2 zoning district is similar to a planned unit development district. She stated that it is unlike any other district in that Council determines what types of uses are located in the district based on a redevelopment plan. Ms. Dacy stated that staff is recommending first reading of the ordinance to rezone this property in the northeast quadrant of Mississippi and University to S-2 with 16 stipulations. Mayor Nee stated that this rezoning question is very difficult. He stated that he has given much thought to Mr. Thayer's comment about not making the same mistake as last time in regard to this property. He stated that the Planning Commission has recommended against the rezoning and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority has recommended approval. He stated that he felt if the rezoning is approved, there may be several families immediately to the east of the property that may have some damages. He stated that, on the other hand, there are several families that had that impact for the last 25 years. He stated that many persons are opposed to the rezoning, but he has also heard from others in the community who want this site cleaned up. He stated that under an S-2 zoning, the City has all kinds of discretion in terms of the development standards. He stated that in weighing the pros and cons, he felt it would be in the best interests of the City to allow the rezoning. Councilman Billings stated that he contacted those property owners immediately adjacent on 66th Avenue and, unfortunately, the weather has not cooperated, and he did not get out and communicate with residents who live further away from this site. He stated persons several blocks away have signed the petition. Councilman Billings stated that one of the main concerns is the fact that, if this project proceeds and if a LRT station is located on this site, it would necessitate the removal of approximately eight homes for a park-and-ride. He stated that the information received from the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority was that they are not looking at this option for this site. Councilman Billings stated that another concern was that the site was not large enough, and additional homes on Mississippi should be taken for this project. He pointed out that the ratio of lot coverage to buildings is 23 percent for this site and 21 percent for Holly Center so these are about the same. He stated that this site would not be any more over-built than Holly Center. He stated FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEBTINQ OF JIINB 18, 1990 PAGB 11 that on the other side of the issue, some residents did not want a commercial area to encroach into the residential neighborhood. Councilman_ Billings felt that if this rezoning is approved, it would precZude or minimize the future commercial encroachment into the residential neighborhood. He stated that there would be no entrances into the residential area from 66th Avenue, and there should be no increased traffic on 66th Avenue as a result of this project. Councilman Billings stated that very few people have an idea what type of development should be allowed on this site other than to make it into a park. He stated that because of the close proximity to University Avenue, this site would not be considered for a park. He felt that other options would mean several peak periods of traffic when workers arrive and depart from work. He stated that the traffic for this project would be staggered rather than two peak hours, which is probably a better option for this site. Councilman Billings stated that one of the other comments pertained to odors. He stated that he does have a stipulation to add regarding odors being generated from a restaurant or dry cleaning business in particular. Councilman Billings stated that some of the positive aspects of this rezoning is that development of the site would generate more taxes for the City, County, and school district. He also felt that the development would be a visual improvement for the area and City as a whole. Councilman Schneider stated that his concern is what other type of development should be allowed if this is not approved. He felt that the site, as it now exists, is not good for the neighborhood. He stated that this proposal is viable and would benefit most of the neighborhood, except possibly one or two homes. He stated that the report from the traffic consultant is that this would not greatly affect the traffic flow. Councilman Schneider stated that it seems to make sense to proceed with the rezoninq, with the stipulations, so the City has control. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the readinq and approve the ordinance upon first reading, with the following stipulations: (1) the development shall be constructed in accordance with site plan dated March 8, 1990, as represented in ZOA #90-02; (2) the landscaping plan shall be revised to include: (a) six American Lindens al_ong the north lot line (b) Honey Locust trees shall be replaced by Iiackberry trees; and (c) Annabel Hydrangea species shall be replaced with rosa rugose; (3) the petitioner shall pay park dedication fees prior to issuance of the building permit; (4) storm water management calculations shall be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit; (5) all rooftop equipment shall be screened from view from the public right-of-ways; (6) the FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTINQ OF JIINB 18, 1990 PAG$ 12 petitioner shall obtain development contract approval from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority; (7) the petitioner shall execute a maintenance agreement for the landscaping and parking areas; (8) no automotive service uses, car sales, or other outdoor repair/display uses shall be permitted; (9) the City shall have the right to review each use within the center to determine whether or not it is consistent with the intent of the Center City Redevelopment Plan; (10) the site plan shall be revised to provide one 18 foot entrance lane and two 12 foot exit lanes; (11) shared parking and access easements shall be provided on the property for LRT kiss-and-ride traffic, and specifically along the west and south lot lines; (12) all lighting shall be shielded such that the glare does not adversely affect residential properties; (13) all parkinq and drivinq areas shall be lined with concrete curb; (14) all dumpsters shall be screened in accordance with the City's ordinance; (15) underground irrigation shall be provided to landscaped areas; and (16) a comprehensive sign plan for free- standing and wall signs shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Council. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she shared Councilman Schneider's concern about the buildings that now exist on this site and that the problem will only get worse. She felt that this rezoning allows the Council to take some action from causing the neighborhood any more harm. She stated that perhaps another developer may wish to develop the site but may want to acquire more homes which would further impact the neighborhood. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that this is a very difficult decision and hoped the rezoning would change the neighborhood in a positive manner and not a negative one. Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that some development has to be allowed and that it has been elaborated on in the public hearing. He stated that there does not seem to be an answer to what type of development should occur on this site. Commissioner McCarron's assurance has to be taken seriously that this site would not be expanded in the near future for a park and ride facility. MOTION by Councilman Billings to amend the above motion by adding Stipulation No. 17 as follows: (17) the heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and odor venting shall be designed with all possible design features and equipment which is economically available to eliminate to the greatest extent possible any odor emissions from the shopping center or its individual tenants. Proper venting will be provided for all odors caused by the shopping center or its individual tenants. Venting for specific odor causing tenants such as restaurant or dry cleaning shall be routed to the most westerly point of the shopping center building before being released to the open air. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL 1�EBTZNa OF JIINS 18, 1990 PAG$ 13 UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, Councilman Schneider, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Billings voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote. Councilman Sillinqs requested that in the next two �reeks, and prior to a second reading of the ordinance, the developer contact the property owners at 365 Mississippi Street and 370 - 66th Avenue to try and reach a mutually acceptable agreement in reqard to the landscaping. 5. RFSOLUTION NO 34-1990 PROVIDING FOR WATER RATE CHANGE: Mr. Rick Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this resolution would increase the water rates in the City. He stated that the Council, staff, and some of the consultants discussed this issue a number of times since last December. He stated that this process started with the need for additional construction and repairs necessary to provide a proper supply of water to property owners of Fridley. He stated that these improvements were outlined in the Capital Improvement Proqram. Mr. Pribyl stated that various versions of water rates were reviewed, and it was decided to proceed with a two-tier rate structure which would allow for a volume discount for the large users that consume over 5,000,000 gallons per quarter. He stated �� that the rate proposed provides for 0 to 5,000,000 gallons to be priced at .60/1000 gallons and over 5,000,000 gallons to be priced at .55/1000 gallons. Mr. Pribyl stated that in arriving at this �ate structure, the rates were compared with surroundinq communities, and it was found that Fridley is extremely competitive. He stated that the increase still provides for discounts for senior citizens and those who are disabled. He stated that the first billing for this increase would not be effective until October. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked the effect af the increase for a typical family residence. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that if a customer uses 135,000 gallons per quarter, the increase would be about 5.13 percent. Councilman Billinqs stated that he received two letters from constituents questioning the rationale that large users have a five cent decrease in the rate at a time when water conservation is an issue. - Mr. Pribyl� stated that large users are taking the brunt of the increase. Therefore, for those who consume 5,000,000 gallons or over a five cent decrease was offered as it will have a greater impact on these consumers than on the average resident. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL l�E$TINQ OF JIINE 18. 1990 PAGE 14 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 34-1990. Seconded by Councilman Billinqs. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. �r+�r« muF MTNiTTF.S nF THF. PLANNiNG COMMISSION MEETING OF_ MAY 30. 1990• A. �SOLUTION NO 35-1990 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT. L S #90-02 TO SPLIT LOT 2 BLOCK N, RIVER�IIEW HEIGHTS, IN ORDER TO CREATE TWO BUILDABLE PARCELS: Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this property is located north of 79th Way. She stated that the westerly portion of the new lot is within the Mississippi River flood fringe. However, the groposed lots meet all the zoning code requirements for lot size and width and access to a public street. She stated that the petitioner has submitted a survey showing location of the flood fringe district. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of this lot split with three stipulations. She stated that one of the stipulations pertained to the flood elevation line, and the petitioner has submitted a plan which meets this stipulation. She stated that staff is recommending this resolution be adopted approving the lot split, with the three stipulations. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 35-1990, with the following stipulations: (1) the elevation of the first habitable floor shall be at 824 or higher; (2) a grading and drainage plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit; and (3) the petitioner shall apply for and receive a moving and building permit prior to placing the �ouse on the property. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. B. ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND SECTION 205.17.03C �THE M-l. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) AND SECTION 205.18.03C ,�THE M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this zoning amendment for July 9, 1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. C. ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY �nNING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT NINE FOOT WIDE PARKING STALLS IN ��AmaTU i1TCTRTCTG _ ANI� To REDUIRE PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE- STRIPED: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this zoning amendment for July 9, 1990. Seconded by Councilman FRIDLBY CITY COUNCIL MEBTINa OF JIINS 18. 1990 PAaB 15 Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. APPROfTAL OF APPRAISAL AND RELOCATION CONSULTANT CONTRACT FOR IVERSON PROPERTY IN THE RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS AC�ttJISITION PROJECT_:_ Ms. Dacy, Planninq Coordinator, stated that the City will contract with the Federal-State Relocation Consultinq Service and C.R. Pelton and Associates to assist with the relocation and appraisal services for the Iverson property at 7899 Broad Avenue. She stated that this agreement is similar to past agreements, and the cost of the appraisal will be $600.00; reviewal of the appraisal will be about $125.00; and the relocation consulting services approximately $2,405.00. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the appraisal and relocation consultant contract and authorize the Mayor and City manager to enter into this agreement. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. APPROVAL OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA COUNTY FOR TH� ACQUISITION OF OPTICAL SCAN VOTE TABULATION EOUIPMENT: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this agreement relates to the optical scan voting tabulation equipment. He stated that the Council previously passed a resolution urging the County to pursue the purchase of this equipment. He stated that this equipment will be acquired through Unisys, and the joint powers agreement assures the County that the City will participate and the County will provide the election programminq. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into this joint powers agreement for the acquisition of optical scan vote tabulation equipment. Seconded by Councilman Billinqs. Upon a voice vote, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Billings, Councilman Fitzpatrick, and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Schneider abstained from voting. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried. 9. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR FLANERY PARK SHELTE� PROJECT NO. 206: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that this change order is requested for the installation of a one inch rather than a 3/4 inch pipe for water service to the Flanery Park shelter buildinq. He stated that the lenqth of this line, which is over 300 feet, may cause pressure and volume problems with a 3/4 inch line, and there is the potential that this water service would be used in conjunction with a future sprinkling system. He stated that this change can be accomplished for an additional $300.00, and he is requesting the Council authorize this change order. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL l�i$$TINQ OF JIINE 18. 1990 PAGS 16 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. 2 for $300.00 with Karlen Construction for Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. RESOLUTION NO. 36-1990 APPROVING PLAT, P.S. #90-02. MICHAEL SERVETUS 2ND ADDITION: MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to adopt Resolution No. 36-1990. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 37-1990 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1990 - 3: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 37-1990. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. �2ESOLUTION NO. 38-1990 RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND �2ECEIVING PETITIONS TO WAIVE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1990 - 3: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 38-1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. RESOLUTION NO. 39-1990 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1990 - 3: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt� Resolution No. 39-1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, alI voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 40-1990 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1990 - 3: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 40-1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 41-1990 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: WATER, �ANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 210: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 41-1990. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDL$Y CITY COONCIL 1rISBTINO OF JDNE 18. 1990 PAQB 17 16. RESOLUT�ON NO. 42-1990 RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND RECEIVING PETITIONS AND WAIVING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS: WATER, SANITAI2Y SEWER & STORM SEWER PRQJECT NO. 210: MOTION bysCouncilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 42-199�. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 17. RESOLUTION NO 43-1990 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF COSTS THEREOF: WATER. SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 210: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 43-1990. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 18. RESOLUTION NO. 44-1990 ORDERING iMPROVEMENT. APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: WATER. SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 210: M�TION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 44-1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19. APPOINTMENTS: CITY EMPLOYEES: MOTION by Councilman Billings to concur with the following appointments by the City Manager: Name Mary Smith Douglas Himango Bruce Koop- meiners Po�ition Assessment Clerk Grade D Step 2 Non-exempt Public Services Worker A-1 Non-exempt Public Services Worker A-1 Non-exempt Starting Salarv $9.49 per hour $19,815.12 per year $9.62 per hour $20,086.56 per year $9.62 per hour $20,086.56 per year Starting Date June 19, 1990 June 19, 1990 June 20, 1990 Replaces Ferne McCarthy James Brindley Chester Swanson FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL M8$TING OF JUNB 18. 1990 PAGE 18 . �iame Jef frey Potter •• - Police Of f icer Partial- exempt Starting alarv $1,932.00 per month $23,184.00 per year Starting Date June 19, 1990 $eulaces Robert Friegang Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize payment of Claims No. 32380 through 32647. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 21. ,I�,ICENSES • MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 22. ESTIMATES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted: AEC Engineers & Designers 511 - ilth Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 1. Phase I- 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 192 (Inspection Services) Partial Estimate. . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,837.00 2. 1.5 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 193 (53rd Avenue and Johnson Street) (Inspection Services) Partial Estimate. . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,000.00 FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEBTINQ OF J�NS 18. 1990 PAGB 19 Gammon Bros., Inc. 13845 Northdale Boulevard Rogers, l�i _ 55374 Stree� Improv�ement Proj�ct No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 - Estimate No. 16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34,347.49 Walbon Lawn Maintenance 3225 Skycroft Drive St. Anthony, I�T 55418 Corridor Maintenance Project No. 199 Estimate No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4, 342. 86 Modern Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. 2318 First Street N.E. Minneapolis, I�I 55418 Firearms Range Pay Application No. 4. . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,295.00 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a v�i�ce vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meetinq. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Reqular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of June 18, 1990 adjourned at 9:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: � � crnroF F� �� COl1/iMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT' MEM4RANDUM DATE: June 28, 1990 � �. TO: William Burns, City Manager �- FROM: SUBJECT: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Public Hearing for Lot Coverage Zoning Ordinance Amendment Attached is the staff report for the above-referenced zoning ordinance amendment. The�City Council established July 9, 1990 as the public hearing for the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment at the May 30, 1990 meeting. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed language. First reading of the ordinance implementing the amendment is scheduled later on the agenda. BD/dn M-90-457 1 � PLANNING DNISION �A � MEMORrANDUM cinroF fRIDLEY DATE: May 25, 1990 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Proposed Lot Coverage Ordinance Amendment Attached is the proposed amendment to the M-1 and M-2 Districts, adding an additional section to the Lot Coverage section to permit a special use permit application to exceed the maximum lot coverage, up to a maximum of 10�. The Planning Commission reaommended that a special use permit not be permitted; however, the City Council greferred to require a special use permit. The City Council also directed staff to prepare standards by which the permit could be evaluated. Therefore, two standards have been proposed for the Planning Commission and City Council final action. The Attorney's office is also in the process of reviewing the proposed language. Recommendation Staff recoinmends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendment as presented. BD/dn M-90-372 : PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Monday, July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District) and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance, by adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10%) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors identified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permit requests, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage: (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hardsurface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: June 27, 1990 July 4, 1990 Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. 1C Ms. McPhe stated this item will go before the City Council on June , 1990. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SECTION 205.17.03.0 (THE M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT), AND SECTION 205.18.03.0 (THE M-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ADDING THE FOLIAWING LANGUAGE - REGARDING LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors indentified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, includinq, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, VICE-CHAZRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:45 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission's recommendation on the lot coverage amendment was discussed by City Council, and the Council decided they wanted to only amend the industrial districts and require a special use permit to enable either existing developed property or a developer of a new industrial property to petition for an increase in lot coverage up to a maximum of 10$ of the lot coverage ratio. The Council asked staff to prepare two standards to help the City evaluate special use permits. Staff did that and developed Standard (a), that if a developer is going to be proposing an increase of up to 10�, staff will take a total look at the site and determine whether or not they can achieve an overall net reduction in hard surface areas. Standard (b) came from a reiteration of the existing ordinance requirements. Mr. Dahlberg stated that as was amply stated by Councilmember Steve Bilings at one of the Planning Commission meetings when this was discussed, this may not be as originally recommended by the Planning Commisison, but it is at least a start in terms of looking at appropriate sites and developments in the City that potentially 1D pLANNING COI+II+IISSION ISEETING. ISAY 30. 1990 PAGE ll could be better served if a qreater area of lot coverage is allowed. oM TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CBAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED I1ND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:55 P.M. OM TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District), and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance, adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10$) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors indentified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluata special use permits, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMODSLY. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT NINE DT WIDE PARKING STALIS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND T 4UIRE PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED: � 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall A ten (10) foot wide by twenty foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has acce to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egre of an automobile. Parkina stalls mav be nine 9 feet in ' th for uses s ec'fied elsewhere in this code. Where a par ' g stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced eighteen (18) feet. Parking stal s shall be � � ctnroF F� �� DATE: TO: CDl1/iMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM June 28, 1990 � . ��`�•. William Burns, City Manager FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Parking Space Width Attached is the staff report for the above-referenced zoning ordinance amendment. The City Council established July 9, 1990 as the public hearing for the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment at the May 30, 1990 meeting. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed language. First reading of the ordinance implementing the amendment is scheduled later in the agenda. BD/dn M-90-455 2 � � cinr oF fRlDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM May 25, 1990 Planning Commission Members Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Proposed Parking Space Width Amendment Attached is the proposed ordinance amendment to various sections of the zoning ordinance, to reduce the width of a parking stall for specific uses. The Planning Commission recommended that the parking stall width be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the City Council preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet only for long term employee parking, industrial uses, and for multiple family developments. The City Council also recommended that all parking spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be double striped. The Planning Commission may want to consider additional language to the R-3 district, to limit the width of the parking stalls to only multiple family developments to avoid a potential conflict with other uses in the R-3 District, as was discussed regarding the Moose Lodge rezoning application. Possible language is as follows: "Parking stalls may multiple dwelling apartments." Recommendation be 9 feet in width for multiple dwellings and complexes, including rental and condominium The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed zoning ordinance amendment as presented. BD/dn M-90-373 2A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Monday, July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of amending the following Sections of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance to permit nine foot wide parking stalls in certain districts, and to require parking spaces to be double-striped: 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall. A ten (l0) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. Parkinct stalls mav be nine (9 L,feet in width for uses specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet. Parkina staZls shall be striped in accordance with the design on file in the office of the City Engineer. i. R-3 District 2 05 . 09 . 07 . A. ( 3) Parkinct stalls may be nine ( 9) feet in width for multiple dwellincts and multiple dwellinct complexes includinct rental and condominium apartments. 2. M-1 District 205.17.05.D.(13) Parking stalls may be nine 19) feet in width for manufacturinQ uses, warehouse and storaae uses speculative industrial buildincts and�arking lots for lonct term emploYee parkinct. 3. M-2 District 205.18.05.D.S13} Parkinct stalls mav be nine 19Z feet in width for manufacturinct uses, warehouse and storacte uses sneculative industrial buildinas and parking lots for lonq term em.ployee parkinQ. r� -, !1�; Parking Stall Size Page 2 4. S-2 DISTRICT 205.22.6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS All performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. Parking space sizes may be reduced to nine l9) feet in width upon aporoval of a s�ecial use permit. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: June 27, 1990 July 9, 1990 � Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. _ __ _ 2D LANNZNG COI�IIdIBBION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 PAGE 11 could be better served if a greater area of lot coverage is allowed. �IOTION by Ms . Sherek, hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, DECLARED T8E MOTION P.M. seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close e public ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CBAIR�ERSON 1CONDRICR CARRIED I1ND THE PIIBLIC BEARING CLOSED AT 8:55 OT N by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Sa�, to recommend to City Council approval of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Zndustrial Zoning District), and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of/�he Fridley Zoning Ordinance, adding the following language regaz�ding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as ated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of �n percent (10�) of the permitted lot area with a spe al use permit. In addition to the requirements of his Section and the factors indentified in Section 205 05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall c nsider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) F existing developed properties, the total amount f existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. [T N A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR CLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT NINE FOOT WIDE PARKING STALLS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND TO REQUIRE pARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED: 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parkin.g Stall A ten (10 ) foot wide by twenty ( 20 ) foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. garkinq stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for uses specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet. Parkinct stalls shall be 2E �IL��"dII�IG COI�+tIBBION �tEETINC x'�Y 30. 1990 PAGE� i. R-3 District 205.09.07.A.(3) Parkina stalls inav be nine (9) feet in width. �. l[-1 District parkina. 3. M-2 District 205.18.05.D.113) Parkina stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for - - - , � garkinQ. t. B-2 District 205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS .. All performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. Parkina s�ace sizes mav be reduced to nine (9) feet in oT ON by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the reading of the public hearinq notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� 11LL VOTING 11YE, QICE-C8liIRPERBON EONDRICR DECLARED THE l�[OTION Cl�RRZED AND THE PIISLIC HEARING OPEN ]1T 8:53 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission recommended that the parking stall width be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the City Council preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet only for long term employee parking, industrial uses, and for multiple family developments. The City Council also recommended that all parking spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be double striped. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission might war►t to consider additional languaqe to the R-3 district to limit the width of the parkinq stalls to only multiple family developments to avoid a potential conflict with other uses in R-3 district, euch as that discussed regarding the recent Moose Lodge rezoninq application. `•^ �AY 30. 1990 P!►GE 14 PT�.#NNING COI+II�II88iON 1SEE'�r�• 3. x-2 aistrict 205.18 . O5. D. j13 � Parkl *�Q stalls mav �_� '�e �9�„�oc t st�eCt118tive •- . �- 4. B-2 District 205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS All performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are a2lowed in eet er districts. garkina svace sizes mav y duce o n width upon approval of a suer�a� use cermit• IIPON �A VOICE VOTE, 11LL oOT�I��NNGI� YvSLYOICE-CBAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE IriOTION CARRIED 5. �2ECEIVE MAY 22 1990 APPEALS COMMISSION MTNiJTES: Sherek� receive the May o�i TION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Ms. �l, 22, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes. IIPON A VOZCE VOTE, I►LL VOTZNG � � VICE-CHAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED IINADTiMOIISLY. +,DJOURNMENT• �IOTION by Mr. meeting. Opon May 30, 1990, Respectfu Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to adjourn the a vo' e vote, Vice-Chairperson 1Condrick declared the P1 ninq Commission meetinq aajourned at 9:02 p•m• ub�itted, Lyn saba Re ording Secretary 2G CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORlINDIIM Y MANAGER � � TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CIT /�. FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR BIIBJECT: ON-BALE BEER LICENBE FOR NICRI'8 TAP DATE: JIINE 29, 1990 3 Attached is a Public Hearing Notice for a public hearing to be held July 9, 1990 for Nicki's Tap. Councilmember Schneider has requested that we do not place the approval of Liquor Licenses on the same agenda as the public hearings. The Liquor License for Nicki's Tap will be on the following agenda, July 23, 1990, for Council approval. We have also requested that the applicant be present at the public hearing. Based on Councilmember Schneider's request, we will follow this same procedure for all Liquor Licenses in the future. CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will hold a public hearing at the City Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue Northeast on July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. on the question of issuing an On-Sale Beer License to Nicki's Tap for the property located at 5895 University Avenue Northeast. Anyone having an interest in this matter should make their interest known at this public hearing. Shirley A. Haapala City Clerk Publish: June 13 & 20, 1990 C�1 � t c�nroF F�� DATE: TO: COl1/iMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEI'ART'MENT M EMO R.AN D UM June 28, 1990 I� �- William Burns, City Manager �- FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Lot Coverage Zoning Ordinance Amendment Attached is the staff report for the above-referenced zoning ordinance amendment. The�City Council established July 9, 1990 as the public hearing for the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment at the May 30, 1990 meeting. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed language. First reading of the ordinance implementing the amendment is scheduled later on the agenda. BD/dn M-90-457 1 � PLANNING DIVISION �A � MEMOR,ANDUM cinr oF FR! DLEY DATE: May 25, 1990 � TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator SUBJECT: Proposed Lot Coverage Ordinance Amendment Attached is the proposed amendment to the M-1 and M-2 Districts, adding an additional section to the Lot Coverage section to permit a special use permit application to exceed the maximum lot coverage, up to a maximum of 10�. The Planning Commission recommended that a special use permit not be permitted; however, the City Council preferred to require a special use permit. The City Council also directed staff to .. prepare standards by which the permit could be evaluated. Therefore, two standards have been proposed for the Planning Commission and City Council final action. The Attorney's office is also in the process of reviewing the proposed language. Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amendment as presented. BD/dn M-90-372 Il�� PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Monday, July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of amending Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District) and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance, by adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (l00) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors identified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permit requests, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage: (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hardsurface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: June 27, 1990 July 4, 1990 Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. LL Ms. McPhe stated this item will go before the City Council on June , 1990. 3. gUBL C HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SECTION 205.17.03.0 (THE M-1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT), AND SECTION 205.18.03.0 (THE M-2, HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT) OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ADDING TiiE FOLIAWING LANGUAGE - REGARDING IAT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors indentified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Savage, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. QPON A VOICE 90TE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:45 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission's recommendation on the lot coverage amendment was discussed by City Council, and the Council decided they wanted to only amend the industrial districts and require a special use permit to enable either existing developed property or a developer of a new industrial property to petition for an increase in lot coverage up to a maximum of 10� of the lot coverage ratio. The Council asked staff to prepare two standards to help the City evaluate special use permits. Staff did that and developed Standard (a), that if a developer is going to be proposing an increase of up to 10$, staff will take a total look at the site and determine whether or not they can achieve an overall net reduction in hard surface areas. Standard (b) came from a reiteration of the existing ordinance requirements. Mr. Dahlberg stated that as was amply stated by Councilmember Steve Bilings at one of the Planning Commission meetings when this was discussed, this may not be as originally recommended by the Planning Commisison, but it is at least a start in terms of looking at appropriate sites and developments in the City that potentially 1D pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MAY 30. 1990 _PAGE 11 could be better served if a qreater area of lot coverage is allowed. OM TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON �ONDRICR I3ECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:55 P.M. �IQTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to City Council approval of amendinq Section 205.17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District), and Section 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance, adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as stated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the permitted lot area with a special use permit. In addition to the requirements of this Section and the factors indentified in Section 205.05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall consider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) For existing developed properties, the total amount of existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated � to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, VICE-CSAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 4. �UBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT NZN��E fi3DT WIDE PARKING STALIS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND T!REQuIRE PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED: � 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall A ten (10) foot wide by twenty foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has acce to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egre of an automobile. ParkinQ stalls mav e nine 9 feet in ' th or uses s ecified elsewhere 'n th's code. Where a par ' g stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced eighteen (18) feet. Parking sta�.ls shall be � t crnroF F� �� C�11/1MUNI"['Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 28, 1990 � �� .. TO: William Burns, City Manager �• FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Parking Space Width Attached is the staff report for the above-referenced zoning ordinance amendment. The City Council established July 9, 1990 as the public hearing for the proposed amendment. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment at the May 30, 1990 meeting. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed language. First reading of the ordinance implementing the amendment is scheduled later in the agenda. BD/dn M-90-455 2 � t CITY OF FRIDLEY DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING DNISION MEMORANDUM May 25, 1990 Planning Commission Members Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Proposed Parking Space Width Amendment Attached is the proposed ordinance amendment to various sections of the zoning ordinance, to reduce the width of a parking stall for specific uses. The Planning Commission recommended that the parking stall width be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the City Council preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet only for long term employee parking, industrial uses, and for multiple family developments. The City Council also recommended that all parking spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be double striped. The Planning Commission may want to consider additional language to the R-3 district, to limit the width of the parking stalls to only multiple family developments to avoid a potential conflict with other uses in the R-3 District, as was discussed regarding the Moose Lodge rezoning application. Possible language is as follows: "Parking stalls may multiple dwelling apartments." Recommendation be 9 feet in width for multiple dwellings and complexes, includinq rental and condominium The Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed zoning ordinance amendment as presented. BD/dn M-90-373 2A � ' PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the Fridley City Council at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Monday, July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of: Consideration of amending the � following Sections of the Fridley Zoning Ordinance to permit nine foot wide parking stalls in certain districts, and to require parking spaces to be double-striped: 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall. A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. Parkinct stalls may be nine (9) feet in width for uses specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet. Parking stalls shall be striped in accordance with the desi.gn on file in the office _of the Citv Enqineer. 1. R-3 District 205.09.07.A. (3) Parkinct stalls may be nine (9) feet in width for multiple dwellinas and multiple dwellinct complexes includinct rental and condominium apartments. 2. M-1 District 205.17.05.D.(13) Parkinct stalls may be nine (9) feet in width for manufacturinq uses, warehouse and storacte uses speculative industrial buildinqs, and parkinct lots for lonct term employee garkinct. 3. M-2 District 205.18.05.D.j13) Parking stalls mav be nine j9) feet in width for manufacturina uses, warehouse and storacte uses speculative industrial buildincts and parkinct lots for lonct term emplo�ee parkinct. 2C Parking Stall Size Page 2 4. 8-2 DISTRICT 205.22.6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS All performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. Parking space sizes maY be reduced to nime (9) feet in width upon approval of a special use permit. Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the above stated time and place. WILLIAM J. NEE MAYOR Publish: June 27, 1990 July 9, 1990 Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department, 571-3450. 2D gLANNING COI+II�I68ION MEETING. MAY 30, 1990 PAGE 11 could be better served if a qreater area of lot coverage is allowed. '� OM TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close e public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� VICE-CHAIR�ERSON EONDRICR �ECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:55 P.M. / MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Sa , to recommend to City Council approval of amending Section 20 .17.03.0 (the M-1, Light Industrial Zoning District), and Sec�ion 205.18.03.0 (the M-2, Heavy Industrial Zoning District) of�he Fridley Zoning Ordinance, adding the following language regarding lot coverage requirements: (4) The lot coverage as ated in (1) above may be increased up to a maximum of n percent (10�) of the permitted lot area with a spe al use permit. In addition to the requirements of his Section and the factors indentified in Section 205 05.04 to evaluate special use permits, the City shall c nsider the following factors in determining the effect of the increase in lot coverage. (a) F existing developed properties, the total amount f existing hard surface areas shall be evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total building and parking coverage can be achieved. (b) The petitioner shall prove that all other ordinance requirements are met, including, but not limited to, parking, storm water management, and landscaping. A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR tED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE FRIDLEY ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT NINE FOOT WIDE PARKING STALLS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS, AND TO REQUIRE PARKING SPACES TO BE DOUBLE-STRIPED: 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall A ten (10 ) foot wide by twenty ( 2 0) f oot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. garkina stalls mav be nine f9) feet in width for uses s�ecified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet. �arkinct stalls shall be 2E gI�,�"dING COl�iIBBION KEETING� I4++ 30. 1990 Pl�GE�� 1. R-3 District 205.09.07.A.j�� Parkina stalls inay be nine (9� feet in width 2. x-1 District 205.17.05.D.f�3) Parkina stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for - • - - - ----- -..,.,.,,t a�,�,e garkina. 3. M-2 District 205.18.05.D.j�3) ParkinQ stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for _ _ ....i ��,..e parkina. �. B-2 District 205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS .All performance standards for uses in this district shall be � comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. parkinq space sizes mav be reduced to nine (9) feet in width upon approval of a�pecial use vermit OM TION by Mr. Dahlberq, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, 11LL VOTIIdG 71YE� VZCE-CHAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE KOTZON CARRZED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN 71T '8:53 P.M. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission recommended that the parking stall width be reduced to 9 feet for all uses; however, the City Council preferred to reduce the parking stall width to 9 feet only for long term employee parking, industrial uses, and for multiple family developments. The City Council also recommended that all parking spaces, both 9 feet and 10 feet, be doub2e striped. Ms. Dacy stated the Planninq Commission miqht want to consider additional language to the R-3 district to limit the width of the parking stalls to only multiple family developments to avoid a potential conflict with other uses in R-3 district, such as that discussed regarding the recent Moose Lodge rezoninq application. LANNING COIrII+IIBBION l�EETING. lSAY 30. 1990 �AGE 13 Possible language is as follows: "Parking stalls may be 9 feet in width for multiple dwellings and multiple dwelling complexes, including rental and condominium apartments." Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed parking space width amendment with the additional language in R-3 clarifying that the 9 foot wide �talls would only be for multiple family dwelling complexes. oM TION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL oOTING l�YE� VICE-CHAIRPERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED !!ND TSE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:57 P.M. O�! TION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City Council approval of amending the following sections of the Zoning Code to permit nine foot wide parking stalls in certain districts, and to require parking spaces to be double-striped, with the additional language in the R-3 district limiting the width of the parking stalls to only multiple family developments, as recommended by staff: 1. DEFINITIONS 205.03.55. Parking Stall A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. Parkinct stalls may be nine (9) feet in width for uses specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18 ) feet. Parkina stalls shall be striped in accordance with the 1. R-3 District 205.09.07.A.j3) Parkina stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width. . . _ . . .. - - ---, � _ _, ., a._..�1 l , .,nc anA apartments. 2. M-1 Distriot parkina. 2F �L�NNING COI�tI88ION lIEETING, xAY 30 1990 PAGE 14 3. �[-2 District _ ,__ ..,. see± in widtY3 fo2' 205 .18 . 05 . D. j 13 ) Parkina stalls mav be p�.t� 1 __� e��+wT9R� uses. BD--- ative .. • 4. B-2 District 205.22.6 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS All performance standards for comparable tc other similar districts. parkina space sizes uses in this district shall be uses that are allowed _inl other IIPON A VOZCE oOTE, 11LL VOTING 11YE, oICE-CSl►ZRPERSON 1CONDRICR DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED IINANIMOUBLY. , 5. �tECEIVE MAY 22 1940 APPEALS CO1rII�IISSION� �S � o�,TION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to receive the May 22, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes. / OPON A VOICE VOTE� 11LL VOTZNG DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IIN�Di �,�TOURNMENT • , VICE-CHAIRpER60N 1CONDRICR LY. +IOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to adjourn the meeting. DP�n plo°nin �Commi sioa meet�'lnq adjourned ate9s02 p.mhe May 30, 1990, Q Respectfu3.2'y sub�aitted, saDa ding Secretary 2G 3 CITY OF FRIDLEY M 8 M O R A N D II M CITY MANAGER � � TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, /h. FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCS DIRECTOR BIIBJECT: ON-SALE BEER LICENS$ FOR NICRI�B TAP DATE: JIINE 29, 1990 Attached is a Public Hearing Notice for a public hearing to be held July 9, 1990 for Nicki's Tap. Councilmember Schneider has requested that we do not place the approval of Liquor Licenses on the same agenda as the public hearings. The Liquor License for Nicki's Tap will be on the following agenda, July 23, 1990, for Council approval. We have also requested that the applicant be present at the public hearing. Based on Councilmember Schneider's request, we will follow this same procedure for all Liquor Licenses in the future. 3A CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCZL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council of the City of Fridley will hold a public hearing at the City Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue Northeast on July 9, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. on the question of issuing an On-Sale Beer License to Nicki's Tap for the property located at 5895 University Avenue Northeast. Anyone having an interest in this matter should make their interest known at this public hearing. Shirley A. Haapala City Clerk Publish: June 13 & 20, 1990 � � cinroF F�� DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: C011IIMUNITY DEVEL�PMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM June 28, 1990 William Burns, City Manager �� . Jock Robertson, Coaununity Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Second and Final Reading of Ordinance Approving Rezoning, ZOA #90-02, Fridley Town Square Associates Attached is the ordinance rezoning the property at the northeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue from R-1, Single Family, and C-1, Local Business, to S-2, Redevelopment District. The City Council approved the first reading of the ordinance at the June 18, 1990 subject to 17 stipulations. Approval of the second and final reading is recommended. BD/dn M-90-461 r.� �� . .� ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MA.KING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended as hereinafter indicated. Be and is hereby rezoned subject to stipulations adopted at the City Council meeting of , 1990. SECTION 2. The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the City of Fridley and described as: Lot 9, Block 2, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 1 from R-1, Single Family Dwelling, to S-2, Redevelopment District, the same being 355 Mississippi Street N.E.; and Lot 12, Block 3, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 2 from R- 1, Single Family Dwelling, to S-2, Redevelopment District, the same being 368 - 66th Avenue N.E. ; and Lots 10, 11 and 12, Block 2, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 1, except the South 30 feet thereof, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Anoka County, Minnesota, and Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, Block 3, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 2, according to the recorded plat thereof one file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Anoka Caunty, Minnesota, from R-1, Single Family Dwelling, and C-1, Local Business, to S-2, Redevelopment District, the same being 6525 University Avenue N.E. Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District S- 2 (Redevelopment District). SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change the official zoning map to show said tracts or areas to be rezoned from Zoned District R-1 (Single Family Dwelling) and C-1 (Local Business) to S-2 (Redevelopment District). Ordinance No. Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: June 4, 1990 First Reading: June 18, 1990 Second Reading: Publication: I � COlrII�I88ION VACANCY FOR CITY COIINCIL CONSIDERATION PREVIOIIS MEMBER Human Resources Commission TBRM 8%PIRES Paul Westby 4-1-93 666 Kimball Street (H) 780-4326 (B) 571-1345 APPOINTEE 5 � t c�nroF F�a� DATE: TO: CO1NtMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM June 28, 1990 William Burns, . �� . City Manager,�1 FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Lot Coverage Requirements in the M-1 and M-2 Districts Attached is the ordinance amending the lot coverage requirements in the M-1 and M-2 zoning districts. The ordinance amendment would permit a maximum of a 10� increase in the lot coverage with a special use permit. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amendment at the May 30, 1990 meeting. Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed ordinance for first reading. BD/dn M-90-459 LJ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 205 ENTITLED "ZONING", BY AMENDING SECTIONS 205.17.03 AND 205.18.03 The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: 205.17 M-1 LIGHT ZNDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS 3. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS C. Lot Coverage. � The lot coveraae as stated in (1) above mav be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10$) o� the permitted lot area with a special use nermit. , effect of the increase in lot coveracte: � For existing developed t�roperties, the tota� the total buildincr and varking coveracte can be achieved. �b,Z The etitioner shall rove that all other - - - -- •----- management and landscapinct. 205.18 M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGULATIONS 3. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS C. Lot Coverage. � The lot coveracte as stated in (1� above mav be increased up to a maximum of ten percent (10�) of the factors identified in Section 205.05.04 to . " .. ��L__ -L_1'7 effect of the increase in lot coveraae: . � Ordinance No. Page 2 lal �_ evaluated to determine whether a reduction in the total buildinq and parkinQ coveracre can be achieved. not limited to parking storm water manactement and landscapinct._ PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: July 9, 1990 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: . : t � unroF fRiDLEY DATE: TO: COl1/iMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART'MENT MEMORANDUM June 28, 1990 i't� ,�� william Burns, City Manager,�j FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: First Reading of Ordinance Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Parking Space Width Attached for first reading is the ordinance changing appropriate sections of the zoning ordinance tn permit a nine foot wide stall in the R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling, the M-1, Light Industrial, and the M-2, Heavy Industrial districts, and as a special use permit in the S-2, Redevelopment District. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed ordinance at the May 30, 1990 meeting. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance for first reading. BD/dn M-90-458 7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 205 ENTITLED "ZONING", BY AMENDING SECTIONS 205.03.55, 205.09.05, 205.17.05, 205.18.05, AND 205.22.06 The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows: 205.03. DEFINITIONS 55. Parkinq Stall. A ten (10) foot wide by twenty (20) foot long area to store one (1) automobile, which has access to a public street or alley and permits ingress and egress of an automobile. �arkinct stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for uses specified elsewhere in this code. Where a parking stall abuts a curb or sidewalk, the length may be reduced to eighteen (18) feet. Parkinct stalls shall be striped in accordance with the desiQn on file in the office of the Citv Engineer. 205.09. R-3 GENERAL MIILTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT REGIILATIONS 5. PARKING REQUIREMENTS D. Design Requirements. ,�12) ParkinQ stalls mav be nine (9) feet in width for multiple dwellincts and multiple dwellinct complexes, includinct rental and condominium apartments. 205.17 M-1 LIGHT INDOSTRIAL DISTRICT REGIILATIONS 5. PARKING REQUIREMENTS D. Design Requirements. S13) Parking stalls maY be nine (9) feet in width for lonct term employee parkinct. 205.18 M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REGIILATIONS 5. PARKING REQUIREMENTS D. Design Requirements S13) Parking stalls mav be nine (9)_feet in width_for lony term employee parkina. 7A Ordinance No. Page 2 205.22. S-2 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REGIILATIONS 6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS All performance standards for uses in this district shall be comparable to other similar uses that are allowed in other districts. Parking space sizes mav be reduced to nine (9) feet in width upon approval of a special use permit. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: July 9, 1990 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: : FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDIIM 90-6-8 MEMO TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGER FROM: ROBERT D. ALDRICH, FIRF CHIEF �N,� DATE: JIILY 3, 1990 BIIBJECT: FIRE CODE AMENDMENTS TO TH CI CODE � ?gZ Attached is a corrected copy of e amendments to the City Code relating to the Unif rm Fire e. It is intended that we adopt by reference the 88 Editio of the Uniform Fire Code as promulgated by the Western Fire Chiefs Association. Two significant changes are present in the code being presented for adoption. The first change is the adjustment to the permit fees for those uses and occupancies requiring permits under the Fire Code. The increase is approximately 60� across the board. The second change of importance is the addition in 108.03 of a user surcharge. This surcharge equal to 1/10 of 1 percent of the building permit valuation is to be collected at the time the building permit is issued. The change that occurs here is that in the previous code, there was a Fire Department fee equal to 1 percent of the building permit fee, however in the past this fee was never collected and accordingly then, no revenues were raised to offset costs incurred by the Fire Department in plan checks, on- site inspections, and those other items that involve the Fire Department as a part of construction. I had previously forwarded to you a copy of Virg Herrick's opinion as to the legality of this section dealing with the surcharge. It is my recommendation that the Council hold the first reading of the ordinance amending the City Code Chapter 108. RDA/ss :� E%TRACT FROM FRIDLEY CITY CODE ios. � �.�oN (Ref. 254, 262, 329, l23, 475, 640, 709, 735) 108.01. PQLICY SPATFI'�3'Tr It is declared to be the policy o� the City of i�ridley to vi9orouslY' promote the safety and welfare of fts citizens. In this contest, the traditional approach to fire servioe — s�Zessin9 fires or�e ignfted, rescuing 6urvivors, and too frequently exposing firefighters to physical danger and death, all at a disproportionately high community investment of.resources in hunanpower and equiprnPnt — is declared �a�acoeptable for Fridley. Rather, it is the f ire 6afety policy of the City of Fridley to efficiently utilize its resources and maximize life, safety and citizen welfare by requiring that fire preve�tion and extinguish ing systems be built into certain new structures. Thus, the effectiveness of the Fridley Fire Department is enhanced and exterx3ec7 at a lvwer oost to the citizenry; life safety is allocated a priority at least as great as praperty protection; and the awner oost of built in fire protection is partially or wholly repaid in savings on initial construction costs and annual f ire insurance preniims. 108.02. ADOPrIRJ OF FIItE PR�ION �lE Tl�e Minnesota Uniform Fire Prevention Code, as promulgated by the Minr�esota Departnent of Public Safety, and enbodied in C7�apter Four of the Rules and Regulations of the State Fire Marshall Division (Fire Maz. 30-51 inclusive) is hereby acbpted by refer�ce �a �ae a part of this Code, t�ereafter referred as MUFC except for those prwisions of said Code a�►endc,d• m�dified, oz deleted. (Ref. 329, 475) �e M1FC is a�nended as follaws: 1. Fire Mar. 45 is deleted and Article 20 of the UFC (published by the Internatioz�al Confer�ce of Building Officials and Western Fire Chiefs Association, 1973 Ed.) is adopted in its entirety by ref erence. 2. Fire I�ar. 33, Section C. is deleted in its entirety and Section 1.203 of UFC (published by the International Confere�ce of Building Officials and Western Fire Quefs Assxiation, 1973 Ed.) is adopted in its entirety. 3. Fire Mar. 33� Section D. is c3elet�d in its entirety 1.204 of UFC (published by the International Canfer�ce Officials 8nd Westsrn Fire Q�iefs Assxiation, 1973 Ed.) in its entirety. �. Fire I�ar. 33, Section G. is deleted in its entirety 1.207 of tTFC (published by the International Conferer�ce Officials and Western Fire �iefs Assxiation, 1973 Ed.) fn its entirety. and Sectfon of Building is adopted and Section of Building is adopted 108.02. 8A •.: _ v• � ia ..• . . .. , • ... 106-1 108.03. FF.F.S. USEEt 5'�VICE � 1. Plan check and bu3lding in.�cpectior► fees. �e Fire Qiief shall charge a fee equal to one percent (18) of the building permit fee for each multiple dwelling, commercial, industrial or public assembly to offset costs incurred by the deparbnent during developnent and o�nstruction. 2. Installation fees. 7nstallation fees and peimits shall be required for the follvwing: A. Auto Sprinkler Sj►stesns. B. Fire Alarm Systens. C. Restaurant Bood Ext. Bystens. 3. Permit fees. Where permits are required in the Articles of the Uniform Fire Code and in other portions of this Code, the �ief of the Fire Department _ shall collect fees in acco�dance with the schedule set forth in �apter il of the City Code of F�idley. 4. Fee schedule. �e fees as prwided in this C7�apter shall be annuallY reviewed and presented to the City Council and shall be constructed so as to insure proper charges for seLVioes z�ered. 108.04. FIItE EXTII�ULSF�iS 1. A�ceptance and apprwal. No f ire extinguisher required b� the Fire Frevention Bureau shall be deened acoeptable �less such extinguisher has been aPproved bY. an� carries the rating label of, the Underwriters Laboratories or Factory Mutuals. 2. Maint�nance. All required fire extinguishers shall be maintained in accordance with N.F.P.A. Std. #10 entitled, Std f or Portable Fire Ektinguishers. ed 1975. 3. Recharging. Rhe recharging of cbenically activated hand f ire extinguishers shall be acoorr�lished by persons who are skilled and competent in such work, including certified f irms or individuals who are actively �gaged in the business of fire extinguisher seivicing, and by such other persons who have been approved by the Chief of the Fire Prevention Bureau, such as persons who by training and qualific�tions are able to perform such service. tRef• 262) 108.05. �'t�6NFS l. Permits for the use of explosives shall be obtained from the Pc>lioe Departrnent. (Ref. 475) 2. i�b person shall possess, store, keep, sell or offer for sale, a� 106.05. $B ��. itti�� . �- � .; �• �. � r .i�- F�».�� - �� 108-2 give away, use� dischar9e °r tr�sP°=t nr�y explosives in the City except by the authority of a writt�n pern►it as specified above ar�d =��ended t� the Fire PrevPS►tioc� Off ioer. 108.06. FIIt�� e Fire Pre�v�ticr► Qiief or a duly authorized assistant shall be e=�vwered to order the establishment of fire lanes on public or privnte property as maY be necessary in order that the travel of fire equipment may not be imped�d or interfered with and that acoess to f ire hydrant� and buildin95 naY not be blocked of f. When a f ire lane has be� orc3ered to be established, it shall be marked by a sign bearing the words 'No Parking - Fire Lane' or a similar message. i�fien such f ire lane is established on public property or a public right-of�way, the neoessary sic� or signs shall be provided b� the City of Fridley, and when on private property, they shall be erected and maintained by the awner at his or her expe�se. Such sic,g�s shall be installed within thirty (30) days after notif ication of the order. Thereafter, no person shall park n vehicle or otherwise oxupy or obstruct a fire lane. (Ref. 423, 640) lOB.07. IDCAL PRO'li7LTIVE Ai�'LS 1� �e educational, institutional and the following residential occupancies - hote2s, dormitories,.lodging and rornning homes, as defined in the N.F.P.A. Std. 101, referred to as the Life Safety Code, and apart�nent buildings having four (4) or mpre �nits - shall have lxal protective alarm systems and shall comply with the follvwing: ' A. Be Dquipped with a Local Protective Signa2ing System in acoordance with N.F.P.A. Std. 72A. B. Znsure that each ala.rn1 bysten insta2lec� in the xcupancies listed in 108.07.2 immediately, wben activated by any means. sounds a general alarm signal throughout the building and simultaneously signals an alazm condition to the Anoka County E�nerger�cy Car�ua�ications Center and other oenter apprwed by the City. Zbe alarm shall be so equiPPed ns to sic�al the Dnergenc.y Cor�rua�ications Center when the alazm is activated or when there is trouble in the alazm systen or when the power is 6hut of f. �},e D�nergency Caimunications Center shall imnediately acivise the Fridley Fire Depart�t of any Buch si�al. �e pawer supply off ngy be transmitted as a trouble si�al. C. Fbst in a praninent location in near prox�mity to the alarm power supply a�+itch a si� indicating that the Fire Department shall be notified prior to shut down of the system�s power eupply. �e required sic� shall be as follcws: Nat less than 6" : 10" with a red background and white lettering and shall read: "WARNING - Fire Departrnent will tespcnd if alarm system is c3eactivated. Call 427-1212 before working on alana system.• (Ref 709) - �• � � i�. � v• •.• a . ., 108.07. $C 108-3 108.08. PIIiMItiS RF�t)gtID Penaits shall be required for the follcwing: OFC Article 2— Tire R�ebuilding Plants UFC Article 3— Auto Wrecking UfC Article t— Bowling Alley Rei. Sprinkler Sj►stens Fire Alazm Inst. UFC Article 8— Canpressed Gases UFC Article 9— Grain Elevators LTFC Article 12 — Fireworks UFC Article 13 — R�staurant Hood b�stens UFC Article 14 — S�rayfinishing UFC Article 15 — Fl�anable Liquids R�iw�al o Undergrouna Tanics UFC Article 17 — F'�nigation UFC Article 18 — Re�Qair Garages LTFC Article 19 — Hazarcbus Materinls UFC Article 20 — L. P. Gases UFC Article 21 — I�er Yards i Woodworking UFC Article 22 — l4a�esi�an mcre than 10/day UF� Article 27 — Burning Permit 108.09. PS�LT�.S Any violation of this Chapter is a misdemeanor and subject to all penalties provided for 6uch violations under the provisions of QLapter 901 of the Fridley City Code. . �-, ►. •�� •�. • � i• ��. 108.09 . 8D 108-4 E%TRACT FROM FBIDLBY CITY CODE (WITH PROPOSED CHANGES) ii.o9. gE revoked only for cause and upon adequate notice and the opportunity to be heard. 11.09. DISPI�,Y Any person to whom e license or permit is issued pursuant to this Code shall be required to display such license or permit or to make said license or permit available for review upon request. This provision shall be subordinate to any other provision of this Code which expressly requires that said license or permit shall be displayed or posted. 11.10. FEES License and permit fees shall be as follows: CODE SIIBJECT 17 Auction 27 Billiards 15 Bowling Alleys 28 Carnivals 30 Charitable Gambling Permit 21 Christmas Tree Lots 12 Cigarette Sales 206 Contractors 217a Conversion Condominium (one time fee) 217b 101 702 607 06/90 Condominium (annual fee) Dogs Drive-in Thesters Entertainment FEE $20.00 for 2 days, $30.00 weekly, $150 year $40.00 for first table, $10.00 each additional $40.04 + $10.00Jlane $200 deposit, $75 application fee, and $75.00 for first day; $75 each additional day $25.00 for one day small events, i.e. raffle, etc. $200.00 + $100.00 deposit $12.00 See Chapter 206 (a) 2 Ownership Units $500 (b) 3-7 Ownership Units $750 (c) 8-12 Ownership Units $1,000 (d) Over 12 Units $1,000 plus $SO per unit for every unit over 12 (a) 2-4 Ownership Units $20 (b) 5-12 Ownership Units $30 (c) 13-24 Ownership Units $40 (d) Over 24 Ownership Units $50 $2.50 Neutered or Spayed $5.00 Nonneutered or Nonspayed $1.00 Duplicate (Prorated - $1.00 minimum)* $25.00 Kennel $400.00 $85.00 11-2 407 . 108 108 103 111 111 111 25 25 202 24 603 603 603 603 602 603 06/90 11.09. Excavation in Public Permit Fee. .....$ 110,00 � F Rights-of-way and Easements Reinspection Fee. ..$ 25.00+ Excavation Security Bor►d Yermit Fee. .....$ 1,000.00 (Cash, certified check Letter 10 or more. .....$ 10�000.00 of Credit or construction bond) Explosives $10.00/year Fire Alarm Imstallation $25- Ae +£�ec-t;�ea� -Pe�� -- $ 5 0. 0 0 Fire Arms $25.00 Food Establishments $45.00* prorated to minimum (Grocery, Meat, Baker) of $35.00 (Restaurants. Drive-in) Food, Temporary Food Vehicles Golf Course, Driving Range Hotels, Motels House Ttailers Junk Yards Liquor� Gambling Endorsement Liquor (On-Sale) No Entertainment Entertainment and or Dancing Investigation Fee Partnership Liquor (Sunday) Liquor� Temp. Intox. On-Sale Liquor� Non-Intox. Malt: Off Sale Beer On Sale Beer On Sale Temporary Beer Investigation Fee� initial On Sale Beer Liquor (Wine) Investigation Fee� initial $30.00 $50.00 first vehicle, $5.00 each additional $30.00 $125.00 first unit; $5.00 each additional $30.00 temporary parking $50.00 occupancy $350.00 $300.00 0-3000 sq.ft. 3001-6000 sq.ft Over 6000 sq.ft. $6�000 * $7,000 * $8,000 * $7,000 * - $8,000 * $9,000 * $200.00 individusl, $400.00 corp. $200.00* $120.00 $60.00* $325.00* (includes off sale) $60.00 $90.00 individual� $180.00 corp. partnership, etc. $1,000.00 * $200.00 individual, $400.00 corp. partnership, etc. 11-3 603 605 605 606 101 608 203 509 18 220 22 14 23 113 I3 125 125 125 125 06/90 11.09. Liquor (Employee Dispensing $10.00 Liquor - Intox.) Liquor (Bottle Club) $300.00 Liquor (Public Drinking) $300.00 Liquor (Veterans) $150.00 Livestock Horses $15.00 first; $5.00 each additional Cows, goats and/or sheep $10,00 first; $1.00 each additional Rabbits $10.00 ' Fowl $15.00 5 acres plus farm $25.00 Lodging Tax 38 of rent charged l+lobile Home Parks $30.00 +$1.00 per trailer site (One time fee) Motorized Vehicles Rental $50.00/Vehicle Movers $100.00 State Licensed Multiple Dwelling Single rental unit $12 T�o rental units $24 $36.00 for 3-7 units $49.00 for 8-12 units, $49.00 per building with over 12 units + $2.00 per unit for every unit aver 12 Music Festivals $700.00/day + $100.00 filing fee Peddlers/Solicitor $60.00 per peddler Public Dance $75.00 Refuse Haulers, Garbage Truck $60.00 for first truck and $15.00 each additional truck Retail Gasoline Sales $60.00 Private Pump $30.00 per location Saunas and Massage Parlors (Business Investigation Fee) $1,500,00 Saunas and Iiassage Parlors (Operation and Maintenance) $3,000,00/year Saunas and Massage Parlors (Certificate Investigation $100 each Fee) Saunas and Massage Parlors (Employee Massage Practice Certificate) $SO each/year `' •l� i i 11-4 214 Signs and/oz Billboards 108 Spzinkler Systems 108 Storage Tank Installation (L.P.) UFC Article 82 108 Street Vending 116 Suntanning Rooms 115 Swimming Pools, Public 504 Taxicab 104 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 06/90 ii.o9. 8 H $24.00 less than 40 tq.ft. $60.00 more than 40 sq.ft. s}�,f►g-•-3st-l��iea�� $20.00 - lst 10 Heads $��SE}-each-�8 the�ea€t� $2.00 each 10 there- af ter $65.-00 0 - 10�000 gallons $ 75.00 $8�.�0 10,001 and up gallons $100.00 $��.AD Mixer $ 25.00 $1.i.A0 Vaporizer $ 25.00 $30.00 industrial $50.00 residential $75.00 both $500.00 $250.00 per outdoor pool ' , $350.00 per indoor pool + 25$ of base per added pool� enclosed area $50.00 company and lst cab + $5.00 each additional vehicle Tree Removal/Treatment '. $40.00 UFC Article i - 31 $25�(�.fl0 $350.00 Tire Rebuilding UFC Article � - 34 $^z9(i�.-00 Auto Wrecking UFC Article 4- 2 6 $3A:00 Refinishing ( Bowling Alley ) UFC Article 8 - 74 $38:-00 Compressed Gases UFC ArticZe 4 - 76 $�A4.-00 Grain Elevators i UFC Article ��- - 7 8 $38 � Fireworks UFC Article �� - 10 $50.00 Restaurant Ext. Systems UFC Article 1[� - 45 $3a-DD'- Sprayfinishing � UFC Article �S - 79 $39:00 Flammable Liquids UFC Article �S- - 7 5 $36:00 Cryogenics $300.00 $ 65.00 $ 50.00 $200.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 11-5 - ii.o9. 81 �- 108 UFC Article �� - 79 $50.04 $75.00 per site ; Underground Tank Removal ` 108 UFC Article 3� • 47 $Sa88 $100.00 �migation 208 UFC Article 1�-- 29 S�ee $ 50.00 Repair Garages 108 UFC Article 21 • 30 $31�AA $ 50.00 �.a�ebe-r Yards and �,Toodworking Fiber 108 UFC Article 22 - $30.00 Magnesium more than 10/day 108 UFC Article Z� - 11 $� On $ 7 5. 00 Burning Permits 104 19 Used Motor Vehicles $150.00/year FFFS FOR SERVICES RENDERED 206 Building Permit Fees See Chapter 206 206 Certificate of Occupancy Fees See Chapter 206 206 Electrical Permit Fees See Chepter 206 � 206 Land Alteration Excavating See Chapter 206 or Grading Fees Uniform Building Code Chapter 70 adopted by reference (Plan Checking Fees and Grading Permit Fees) 211 Lot Splits $100.00 206 Mechanical Permit Fees See Chapter 206 212 Mining Permit See Chapter 206 206 Moving Permits Fee See Chapter 206 211 Plat $500.00/20 lots + $15.00 each additional lot 206 Plumbing Permit Fees See Chapter 206 206 Reinspection - Building Fee See Chapter 206 205 Rezoning 5300.00 206 Sewer Permit Fee See Chapter 206 402 11-6 06/90 205 Special Use 205 Town House Development 206 Utility Excavations Permit Fees 206 iJater Permit Fee 402 206 Water/Waterways Permit Fees City Vacations Charter 21Z Variance $200.00 for all, $100.00 for 2nd access, building $500.00 See Chapter 206 See Chapter 206 See Chapter 206 $150.00 $60.00 for R-1, $100 for all other 11.11. 8J *Prorate 11.11. YENALTIES The penalty for late payment of all licenses and permit fees as shown in Section 11.10 of the City Code shall be 258 of the amount of the fee if received from 1 to 7 days late. If the payment is received more than 7 days after it is due, the penalty shall be 50$ of the fee. (Ref. 619) 108 06/90 UFC Article 80 Hazardous Materials 5100.00 11-7 1957-1989 Total For 8 K ' Residen[ial �mer�ial Iridustrial Other Year _ � Year _______ ---------------- 1g5� " S 4,930,950 $ 458,22J $ 165,00o r S 888'620 510,049,834 1958 9,301,614 748,220 ' 1959 6,924,970 221,836 649,049 2? 0,583 8,066,435 1960 6,704,602 254,042 710,000 1,932,580 9,601,224 1961 7,826,955 532.500 800,000 692,420 9,851,8'75 1962 8,956,826 369,500 205,000 189,226 9,720,551 1963 6,360,291 331,200 851,000 290,980 7,833,471 1964 5,480,354 889,000 753,000 792,135 7,914,489 565 18,251 628 1965 12,736,775 1,115,288 230,000 4,169, � 1966 4,149,024 779,500 874,515 648,956 6,471,995 1967 4,241,201 1,174,775 6,809,000 1,154,130 13,379,106 1968 5,794,381 2,531,860 1,685,700 548.395 10,550,336 1969 5,318,438 1,156,500 5,626,000 1,352,621 13,453,559 1970 8,393,929 1,598,000 1,475,600 533,645 12,001,174 1971 10,548,899 685,400 79,000 2,701,216 2i��3,560 15,157.890 19�2 , , 8 646,978 5,649,774 318,918 **��96$��SB 1973 3,094,705 1.251,097 3,231,087 43,174 7,620,063 1974 3,574,817 7,900 4,346,749 3,261,596 11,191,062 1975 4,856,049 290,550 4,393,363 503,090 10,043,052�;�� 1976 7,668,666 1,214,996 5,088,851 283,036 14,255,549 1977 15,124,880 742,000 4,854,312 2,222,219 22,843,31�i� ' 1978 5.667,384 714,050 4,533,218 278,409 11,193,14� � 1979 5,838,558 67,40U 7,687,997 351,532 13,945,481T,�. 1980 2,569,866 126,100 23,796,167 1,134,763 27,626,896 1981 3,126,575 0 4,589,180 564,603 8,280.35F3'� lgg2 4,700,094 117,850 5,380,248 2,389,468 12,587,660� 1983• 4,046,167 3,304,650 5,616,647 3,133,303 16,100,767 � l4gq 4,497,189 13,231,654 6,100,778 1,501,886 25,331,507`' 1985 7,590,393 3.819,750 8,910,033 5,121,807 25,441,983 1986 5,830,550 3.905,600 6,963,341 697,322 17,399,813 lgg7 23,413,715 1,180,000 8,665,600 1,972,690 35,232,005 �9gg 3,660,384 12,251,904 5,.169,590 4,662,907 25,744,785 1,989 3,552,035 3,252,850 27,277,113 859,074 34,911,072 S yn A utR a�6 � 1u4� �� Z��39,53I,bo 22, 8��, ba�. (.0 .. . Y � do� o�. '�� a �, 739,`T3 ,� �� z, 4� s.�� a 0►I£: Other: includes municipal buildings, churches, schr�ols, tnspitals & signs. ** Voiaed Permits decreased value: 1505 N. Znnsbruck $3,752,248 and Wall Cor�. $2,434,950 .' •1� �=_�l� �_ �,_ .r;..�V �r' __►:�� 1 �e �ief Buildirg Offici.al 6ha11, before issuing peimits far the erection of ar�y buildisg oz �re, o� for any edditian to any existirg building or structtu�e, or for any alteratian or z�pair to ar�y existirg building c� stivct�u�e, t�cx� aPPlication th�erefore, require the payment by the applicant for s�x3� pesmit of fees to the airo�uit 2�erein belcw set forth ar�d in the maru�er Aerein pa�ovided to�wit: 'lC7I'AL VALLTE $1 to $500 $501 to $2,000 $2,001 to 525,000 $25,OOl.to $50,000 $50,001 to $100,000 $100,001 t,c $500,000 �� $15 (Minim�n F�e is S15 plus suzd�ar9e) $15 far first S50o plus $2 for et+di additior�al S100 or fraction tl�ereof, to er�d irrcludirx3 $2, 000 $45 for first $2,000 plus S9 far each additianal S1,000 or fractio� thereof, to and includir�g S25, 000 5252 for fiZSt S25,000 plus $6.50 for eaCh a3ditionai $1,000 ar fractio� thereof, to end ir�cluding S50, 000 $414.50 for first S50,000 plus $4.5o for each additivnal $1,000 or fraction ther+eof, to end 3ncludin3 5100,000 $639. 50 for first $100, 000 pltis $3 .50 for eac3� additianal $1,000 or fractian thereof, to and including S500,000 5500,001 to $1,000,000 $2039.50 for the first S500,000 plus $3 for each additianal Sl, 000 or fzactian thereof, te ar�d includ�rg $1, 000, 000 51, 000, 001 ar�d up S3539. 50 for the first $1, 000, 000 plus $2 for eac3z additional $1,000 or fractiaa� thereof L�tIVEi�Y �PRF5SI�1 E9CT�7FT (Ooc�ctet.e Q.ui� Stt�eets Only) Alternate "A" : Renvval and replaoanent of cu� and gutter anly - Drriveway width plus 6 feet times $13.50. Alternate "B" : Relnvval ar�d replao0nent of aarb and gutter nnd in�tall a 3 fovt wide approach with 6 irrch de�th - Darive�ay width plus 6 feet times S15.75. • �- . � . .,- ..� �. � ., P�1�tits foY' v�t�uct.ie�► will be issued a�►i ni,R..+++ of 24 hau5 fZLm the time of applicatian te allvw for prvper review of the pz�osed structu�e ar�d of the �ian site. - A Oertificate of S�rvey of the lot, shewing the location of the faa�datian onoe it has it has been eon.structed will be requit�ed before prooeadir�g with tl'�e fr�ng• � � � EffeGtive 1/1/90 ADGN [ j I�1 I�ND R-2 8 M AI�2 [ ] Building Pernit Applicatiaci Oonstructian Address: Ieqal Description: Owr�er Na�e � 7�ddr�ss: Z1el. � ��• 'j1el. # adcires.s• � I�IPING 71�: i�lh�: ' �7C.7C l�: �: Attach tc this application, a Oertificate of Survey of the lot, with the p�poser3 co�stnx.�tioa� drawn m it to scale. �FRZGN G�' Ie�qth Width Heic�t Sq. Ft. Length Wic'tth Heic�t Sq. Ft. Lengtli Width Iigt/�uuri Sq. F't. Lbrner Ir1t [] Inside Iot i j Ft. Yd Setback Side Yarci Setbacks Zype of Oo�struction: Estimated Gbst: $ Appz�aot. O��letion Date: PZ�q�ed Driveway Width If New Opening Is Desired: Ft. S S WicZth + 6' See Back Page LY�1'E: 1�P'FjI..ICAN!': Z�e1. # P�ezmit Fee $ State SZut�arge $ s�,c a�arge S Driveway E.scrvw $ Park Fee $ sew�zr Main Q�az�ge $ . �• s�aNS: S �I'PY DSE Q�II�Y Fee Sci�edule on Revezs�e Side $.50/$1,000 Valuation 560o per sp,c tlnit Alt. "A" or Alt. "B" Above F�ee Detezmir�ed by D�cJir�eerin3 Agt+ee�ner�t Neoes-�a�' I � Not Neoessa�' [] r,-��►• « • •;- � � r• « •��.• � r � r � • �. « •• �; • r• • �• � : � �+� r � •. . •.: r•,• -�a�• • � r i �►� � • n • �. � : 1 � �'� � • � � / la � /• ' Y�I' 1 � � '�i 1�1• • I� � 1 • i� ' �I' � �1� �1�. �e City Ca.u�ci1 of the City of Fridley does oYdain as follvws: Prior Criapter 108 oodified April l0, �8o is �ereby re�ea in its entirety• New Qzapter los is a�opted as follaws: 108.01. F�2E PR�'VFN�IC�T AND Q"�TII�fJL POLICY STATII�TI'. It is declared to be the policy of the City of FYidley to vigorau.sly promot�e the safety ar�d welfare of its citizens. In this vontext, the traditional approach to �ire service -- su�pres.sirx� fires oa�ioe ignited, re.scuiryg suxvivors, ar�d tvo f�cluen't1Y ex��i�x! firefic�iters to physical d��ger ar�d death, all at a aisportionately nign �uzity ixYV�t of r�esauroes in marrpower ar�d equipemexit — is declared unavoeptable for FYidley. Rather, it is the fire safety policy of the City of Fridley to efficiently utilize its Y�sauroes ar�d max�mize life, safety ar�d citizen wplfare by requirir�g that fire prevention arxl extinguishi.r�g syst:ems be built ir►t.o oertain new structures. �s, the effectiveness of the Fridley Fire Depart�mer►t is enha��oed arid exter�ded at a lc�r oost tA ttiLe citizenry, life safety is allocated a priority at least as great as propertY protec.�ti�, ar�d the owner oost of built-in f ire protection is partially or wholly repaid in savirygs oai initial �onstructioaz costs ar�d annual fire insurarioe pre2nitm�s . 108.02. ADOFII'ION OF FIRE PRE�TEt�TI'ION O�DE Mir�nesota Uniform Fire Oode Adopt�.ed. Zhe Minnesata Uniforn► Fire Prevention Qode, as pranulgated by the Minnesata Depart�aent of Public Safety, ar�d eznbodied in C2zapt�x 7510 of the lailes and Regulatiar�s of the State Fire Mars1�a11 Division is h�reby adopted by referei�oe ar�d made a part of this oode, hereafter referred as I�TF�C exoept for those pravisions of said oode amer�deci, modified or deleted. (Ref 329, 475) 108.03. USER SURQ�E 1. Fire Depart�ment User Surc�arge. A surc�harge equal to eac� buildir�g permit ��;t is issued. 2. Installation Fees. : 001 (1/10�) of the buildir�g ��+;t valuation of shall be collect:ed at the time the buildir�g Tnctallati� fees and ��+;ts si'�all be requ.ired for the follaair�g: AlitO Spr].T1k1P.r S� Fire Alarm Syste� R�taurarit Hood E�ct. Sjrstem : � Page 2 8 Q 3. Pezmit Fees. �erein pennits are requ.ired in the Azticles of tire Uniform Fire oode and in ather portions of this oode, the Chief of the Fire Department shall oollect fees in a000�nve wi.th tl��e sc�adule set forth in Ct�apter ll of the City Dode of Fridley. 108.031. Fee Sc�edule. �e fees as provided in this oYdinar�c;e shall be arnwally reviewed a�l preserited to the City Cau�cil and s�a11 be oonstructed so as to insure Praper c3�aYges for servioes retxie.red. 1: 1� I•� �►Y 1 r ^1 1�•.. 108.041. No fire extir�guisher. required b°i' the Fire Prevention Bur�eau, shall be deemed aa�eptable unless sudz extinguisher has been appraved by ar�d carries the ratir�g label of the iJnderwriters Iaboratories or FactoYy Mutuals. 108.042 All requi.red fire ex s�hall be maintair�ed in a000rdanoe with N. F. P. A. Std. #10 exititled, Std. for Pbrtable Fire extirg�>i�+��. ed 1975. (E�coeption - a��art�nents every tw�o years. ) 108.043. 'Ihe �argir�g of chemically activated hand fire extinguishers s1�a11 be aoocs�q�lished by persons who are skilled ar�d oatq�etent in such wc�rk, includi.rig oertified finns or irxiividuals wha are actively e�ag�i in the busu�ess of fire extir�guisher servicir�g in the area ar�d by suc� oth�x persons who have been approved by the Chief of th�e Fire Preventioa� Hureau, such as persons who by training ar�d qualificati�s are able to perform such seYVive (Ref. 262.) 108.05. EXP'i.06IVES 108.051. Permits for the use of e�losives shall be abtai.r�ed f�► the Pelice Depar�ent. {R�ef . 475. ) 108.052. No person shall possess, store, keep, sell or offer for sale, or give away, use, discharge or transport ar�y explosives in the City exvept by the authority of a written permit as sPecified aUwe and reoca�nerxied by the Fire Prevexition Offioer. 108.06. F'II2E IANES �e Fire Freveritioal Ct�ief or hi.s duly auth�rized assistant shall be a�o�red to on�er the estaUlisimient of fire lanes or► public or private prapexty as may Page 3 � be n�eoes.sary in order that th�e travel of f ire equipa�r�t may nat be i�ecled or iirterfered with, arrd that aooess to fire hydrants at�d buildings may rr�t be blocJc�d off. V�,en a fire lane has bee,n on�e,red to be establisiLed� it shall be marked by a sign beari.ryg the wurds "No Parkirrg - Fire Iane" or a similar message. Wh�en such fire lane is establistied on public prvperty or a public right of way, the neoessazy sign or sign.s shall be provided by the City of Fridley, ar�d when on private praperty, theY shall be erec.�ted ar�d maimained by the vwner at hi.s experise. Such signs shall be installed within (30) days after natification of tt�e order. �ex�eafter, n�o person sh�11 park a vehicle or o�therwise oocupy or obstruct a fire lane. (Ref. 423, 640.) 108.07. IOCAL PRL7I�7GTIVE ALA�S 'Ihe educational, institutional ar�d the follvwir�g resic�ential oocupancies — ho�tels, doxmitories, lodging ax�d raanit�g h�res. �ent b�aildings 1�avir�g more than four (4) iuiits shall have local pratective alarm syste�. 108.071. For the purposes of this Oode, educatioazal, institutional arid the follawiryg residential oocupancies -- hotels, dormitories, lodgir�g ar�d roomir�g ha[�s "- as defined in the N.F.P.A. Std. 101, referred to as the Life Safety Code, shall be quip��ed with a Ir�cal Protective Signaling System in aoo�rdarx�e with N.F.P.A. Std. 72A. 108.072. Each alarm system installed in the oa�x�ncies listed in 108.071 shall i�diatel.y, when activated by arry means, scxmd a ges�era? alarm signal throuqhout the buil.ding ar�d sinail.tanew.sly signal an alarm conclition to the Anoka ootmtY ��3�-'Y �cations Center or ather Center approved by the City of Fridley. The alarm shall be so equip�ed as to signal the �mergency �ataanications Center when the alarm is activated or when there is trouble in the alazm system or when the power supply is shut off. The II�ex�gencY �nications Centex sha].1 ina�ediately advise the FYidley Fire Depari�rent of ariy such signal. �e pow�er s�ply off may be tiar�smitted as a trauble sic�nal. 108.073. Each oocupancy as defiried in 108.071. shall be required to location in near proximity to the alazm power supply switc�z a that the Fire Depaztment shall be natified prior to shut down P�' �PP1Y • 108.074. post in a prcaninent sign indicatir�g of the syste�n.s Zhe Y+equired sign shall be as follc�ws: Nat less than 6" x 10" with a rer� bac3tgrauyd at�d white letteY'irg arid shall read: �TIl�tG - Fire Depart�oerit will respo�d if alarm system is deactivated. Call 427-1212 before w�orkirrg ari alarm systen (Ref . 709.) Page 4 108.08. PIIa'II�'S R�TIRED S�abject UFC Psticle 31 - Tire Rel7uildir�q Plants UFC Article 34 - Auto Wi�ecJ{ing UFC Article 74 - Giunpres��ed Ga-ses UFC Article 76 - Grain Elevators UFC Article 78 - Fir�wr�rks UFC Article 45 - Sprayfinishir�g UFC Article 79 - Flamaable Liquids UFC Article 75 - Ceyogenics UF�C Article 79 - R�noval of Tanlcs UFC Article 47 - Fiunigatioa'i UFC Article 80 - Hazardous Materials UFC Article 29 - RQpair Garages UFC Article 82 - L.P. Gases UF�C Article 30 - Iim�ber Yards & Woodw�rking iTF�C Article 10 - Restaurant Fiood Systems UFC Article li - Burnirrg P�ermits UFC Article 26 - Bawlir�g Alley Ref . sprinkler s�st�ns Fire Alarm Inst. 108.09 � ANNtJAL P�T FEES SHAI�, B� PRdVIDID IN C��1PI�R 11 OF �IIS l]ODE. C�1PTIIt 11 General Pr�ovisions ar�d Fees Se�.�:tion 11.10 is amended as follows: 11.10 O�DE 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 i �� S[T87ECr Fire Alarnis Installatioai Sprinkler syste�s Tire Rebuildiryg UFC Article 31 Aut.o Wreckil'yg UFC Article 34 Ref; n; �; *� (Hawling Alley) UFC Article 26 Ocenpres.sed Gases UFC Article 74 G'�ain El.evatoYS UFC Article 76 , Fit�rks � $ 50.00 $ 20.00 lst 10 heads $ 2.00 each 10 thereafter $350.00 $300.00 $ 65.00 $ 50.00 $200.00 $ 50.00 �: ! Page 5 $ R 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 ��i3 UF�C Article 78 Rest.aurant bct. Syste� UFC Article lo S�raYfinL�*� UF'C Article 45 Flamnable Liquids UF'C Article 79 C�rogenics UFC Article 75 Und,exgramd Tank Re�val UF+C Article ?9 �unigation UF�C Article 47 Regair Gara9es UF'C Article 29 I�azardous Materials UFC Article 80 Storage Z�nk Installatioa� (L.P.) UFiC Article 82 0-10,000 gd1S. 10,000 & up gals. Mixer Vaporizer Fiber Yan�.s & Woodwnrkirg UFC Article 30 Burnirx� Plermi.ts UFC Article 11 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 75.00 per site $100.00 $ 50.00 $100.00 $ 75.00 $100.00 $ 25.00 $ 25.00 $ so.00 $ 75.00 .. �� • � � �• � a+. : r i •. . r i . • r� ri�� .� WIIZIAM J. NEE - I�1YOR ��5�4?-]!� SHIRIEY A. HAl�PAPA - CITY QERK Fisst Reading: Se�or�d Readi.ng: Publication: DAY 4F Engineering Sewer IWater �Parks Streets Ma�ntenance MEMORANDUM �� TO: William W. Burns, City Manager� � PW90-256 FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director DATE: June 28, 1990 BIIBJECT: Locke Lake Resolution The residents of Locke Lake have become quite concerned with the loss of water from the lake area as a result of the Locke Lake Dam failure and what they perceive to be the lack of City's action to correct and alleviate the problem. Staff has attempted to work with the Rice Creek Watershed District to initiate a project for the sedimentation removal and sedimentation basin construction as well as incorporating for the City the restoration of the Locke Lake Dam. To date, we have not been able to achieve the Managers' support. We expect a petition from the Locke Lake residents requesting the City to initiate action. The attached resolution is submitted for Council's consideration to submit to the Rice Creek Watershed District in an attempt to obtain early support and initiate action to prepare preliminary design and cost estimates so that the Locke Lake Dam and sedimentation issues can be brought forward and the project and costs approved. I expect the Locke Lake residents to be at the City Council meeting to either present a petition or petitions regarding this item. JGF/ts Attachment �J � F�� . � RE80LUTION NO. - 1990 itE80L�'1'ION TO THS itIC$ CRE$1C RAT$RSHED DIBTRICT TO ZIIPROPS IACICE LA10E �HEREAB, the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) 509 Plan calls for the sedimentation removal of Locke Lake. This t�rould also incorporate the construction of a sedimentation removal basin, and IISEREAB, the 509 Locke Lake Capital Improvement project can be modified to use either Chapter 112 or 473 fundinq. The City supports this District-wide fundinq process, and 11HEREAB, the 509 Plan is expected to be submitted and apgroved by the Board of Water & Soil Resources in the very near future allowing implementation of the 509 process, and 1BEREAB, the City is ready to implement the RCWD Plan, and 1PHEREAB, the City of Fridley's dam at Locke Lake is failinq and has received a petition for its replacement, and IiHEREAS, it is considered most economical to combine the dam, eedimentation removal and pond construction into one (1) design and contract, and � 1fHEREAB, a preliminary report is necessary to define the scope and costs associated with these improvements, and 1PHEREAB, a number of qoverrunental agencies are involved in the funding, permitting and review of this work, and 1�HEREAB, the Rice Creek Watershed District is the best agency to � coordinate and complete this design and construction work. < NoW, TBEREFORE, B$ IT RE80LVED by the City Council of the City of j Fridley that the Rice Creek Watershed District be the operating aqency for the project includinq the dam replacement, sedimentation 0� removal and sedimentation pond construction, and BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLQED that the City offers to fund $20,000.00 for the preliminary report for this project. It is understood that this amount will be reimbursed if the project proceeds to completion. PA88ED AND 11DOPTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIB 9TH DAY OF JIILY, 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK 10 � CITY OF FRIDLBY M$ M O R A N D II M �° . 1�� TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER��' FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCS DIRECTOR BIIBJECT: t3AMBLING LICENSES FOR THE CHILDREN'8 HBART FIIND DATE: JIINE 28, 1990 We have had several communications with the Children's Heart Fund regarding the issuance of a Gambling License within the Shorewood Inn and George's In Fridley Restaurant. As you are aware, we have had several problems with the issuance of these licenses. One of the problems is that the Gambling Manager's salary is in excess of the amount stated in our City Code. The City Council has requested that they want to keep the Gambling Manager's salary within the limits of the City Code. Following the Council's decision, I am forwarding to you two resolutions in ' opposition to the issuance of a Gambling License for the Shorewood Inn and George's In Fridley Restaurant. Would you please place these resolutions an the July 9, 1990 Agenda. If you have any additional questions concerning this matter, please let me know. AESOLIITION NO. - 1990 ItE80LIITION A(s'AINBT THE ISSIIANCE OF A GAMBLING LICENSE FOR THE CHILDREN�B HEART FIIND WITHIN THE Q�EORGE�B IN FRIDLEY RESTAIIRANT WHEREAS, the City has received a Gambling License Application from the Children's Heart Fund, and WHEREAS, the Children's Heart Fund has requested the City waive the 60 day waiting period, and WHEREAS, the Children's Heart Fund has hired a CPA as a gambling manager who is earning $3,000 per month for his services, and WHEREAS, the Section 30.03.10 of the City Code states "gambling manager's compensation shall not exceed $50.00 per week," and WHEREAS, a Gambling License has been issued to the Lions Club, and WHEREAS, the Gambling License for the Lions Club has not been voided by George's, and WHEREAS, the Lions Club has a lease agreement with George's, and WHEREAS, George's has also signed a lease agreement with the Children's Heart Fund, and WHEREAS, there is now in existence two leases for gambling in George's. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley cannot waive the 60 day waiting period. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Fridley denies the request for the issuance of a Gambling License to the Children's Heart Fund. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THZS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 10A it880LUTI0�i �TO. - 1990 RBSOLOTION lrQAINBT TH$ I88IIANC8 OF 1� QAMBLING LICL+NSE FOR TH$ CHILDRBN�B HE�RT FIIND 11ITHIN THS BHOREWOOD ZNN WHEREAS, the City has received a Gambling License Application from the Children's Heart Fund, and WHEREAS, the Children's Heart Fund has requested the City waive the 60 day waiting period, and WHEREAS, the Children's Heart Fund has hired a CPA as a gambling manager who is earning $3,000 per month for his services, and WHEREAS, the Section 30.03.10 of the City Code Btates "qambling manager's compensation shall not exceed $50.00 per week," and WHEREAS, the Children's Heart Fund is in violation of the City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley denies the request to waive the 60 day waiting period. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Fridley denies the request for the issuance of a Gambling License to the Children's Heart Fund. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLILAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 11 MEMORANDUM - Municipal C�ntor _ 6431 Univ�rslty Av�nu� N.E. Fridley, MN 35432 � �Y ' (612) 571-5450 TO: FROM: DATB: BIIBJ$CT: Office of the City Manager William W. Burns The Honorable Mayor and City Council William W. Burns, City Manager�.�( � June 29, 1990 1990 Capital Improvement Plan on Monday evening, July 9, 1990, we are requesting that Council consider a motion to approve the 1990 version of the Capital Improvement Plan. Council has previously received the plan, which covers the years 1990 through 1995. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. WWB:rsc 12 13 CZTY OF FRIDLEY pLANNING CO�ISSION lLEETING� JIINE 20, 1990 �w��►�►�r � � �r ��r��.►��r ��►��M��N�Y�►��N��N.M�� r�� rALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Betzold called the June 20, 1990, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Don Bet2old, Dean Saba, Sue Sherek, Paul Dahlberg, Larry Kuechle (for Diane Savage) Members Absent: Dave Kondrick, Connie Modig Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Rita Boyle, 6261 Rainbow Drive N.E. Robert Bushey, Sears Outlet Frank Kramer, rep. John Babinski Phillip Leffel, Maaco Auto Painting & Bodyworks APPROVAL OF MAY 30 1990 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: Mr. Dahlberg stated that the following amendment should be made to the minutes: Page 10, last paragraph, the word "amply" should be changed to "aptly". MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the May 30, 1990, Planning Commission minutes as amended. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED tTNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP �90-07, BY PAT AND RITA BOYLE: Per Section 205.07.O1.C.(1) of the Fridley City Code to allow a second accessory building in exceneral1241ocatede at e6261 Lot 1, Block 2, Sylvan Hills, g Y Rainbow Drive N.E. O�+! TION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON DECLARED TSE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. 13A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 20, 1990 PAGE 2 Ms. McPherson stated that the petitioner is requesting a special use permit to allow the construction of a second accessory building over 240 sq. ft. The property is located at the intersection of Rainbow Drive, just west of the University Avenue Service Road. The property is 2oned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as is the adjacent properties to the north, west, and south. Ms. McPherson stated a single family home with an attached two car garage is currently located on the lot. At the rear of the Iot, there is a carport which is hidden by a privacy fence. The petitioner hopes that with the second accessory building, the need for the carport will be eliminated. Ms. McPherson stated access to the lot occurs from the University Avenue Service Road and would continue to remain as it is today. The existing driveway would access both the existing garage and the proposed accessory building. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting to build the largest accessory building possible for the lot. She calculated the remaining available square footage to bring the lot to the maximum 25� lot coverage allowed by the Zoning Code. This allows the petitioner to build an accessory building of up to 624 sq. ft. Ms. McPherson stated that at this tirae, staff has not received any plans or elevations of the proposed accessory building from the petitioner. It is difficult for staff to make a determination as to the compatibility of the proposed structure with the existing structures on the lot and structures on neighboring parcels. The City Assessor has indicated to staff that how buildings relate to each other, both on the lot itself and adjacent properties, may have a significant impact an the values within the area. Staff had included some literature in the staff report. She stated, however, that the Zoning Code does not outline any particular standards for the construction of second accessory buildings. Ms. McPherson stated that since staff is concerned about the compatibility of the proposed structure, staff cannot recommend approval of the special use permit. However, staff has outlined three standards if the Planning Cominission recommends approval of this special use permit to the City Council. 1. The accessory building shall be located i7 1/2 feet from the east property line. 2. The accessory building shall be constructed with wood or vinyl siding painted to match the trim of the existing house. 3. The height of the accessory building shall be limited to 14 feet (Zoning Code requirement). pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. JQNE 20. 1990 PAGE 3 Ms. Sherek stated that if the Planning Commission recommends approval, she would suggest that another stipulation be added that the carport be removed upon completion of the construction of the accessory building. Ms. Boyle stated they are willing to comply with t� val whentthey recommended by the staff and submit plans for app are ready to start construction. She stated one thing they have a problem with is the 17 1/2 foot side yard setback. If the City forces them to build the accessory building 17 1/2 feet from the property line, then the building would be in the middle of their back yard. That would not be aesthetically pleasing to them or the neighborhood, and it would not be accessible to the existing driveway. Mr. Betzold stated it is not possible for the Planning Commission to give permission to go any closer than the 17 1/2 feet. If the petitioner wished to build closer to the side property line, then they would have to apply for a variance through the Appeals Commission. It is difficult for the Conunission to make any decision on this special use permit without plans and elevations for them to look at. Ms. Doyle stated the City staff has already told her how the building should look, and she is willing to comply with that. She just found out about the 17 1/2 foot side yard setback. She thought the accessory building could be built 3-5 ft. from the back neighbor's lot line, but no one had told her that she would have to be so far from the side lot line. Mr. Betzold asked Ms. Boyle if she needed more time to put her plans together. Ms. Boyle stated she will definitely need more time, and staff will need to show her how to deal with the 17 1/2 feet. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to table consideration of special use permit, SP #90-07, by Pat and Rita Boyle to give the petitioner additional time to work with City staff regarding the 17 1/2 foot side yard setback requirement, to be brought back on the agenda at the petitioner's request. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHlIIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMODSLY. 2. TABLED: PUBLIC EARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #90 06 BY ROBERT BUSHEY FOR SEARS OUT�ET STORE: Per Section 205.15.O1.C.(8) of the Fridley City Code to allow exterior storage of materials on Lot 1, Block 1, Shorewood Plaza, generally located at 1000 East Moore Lake Drive N.E. (Public hearing closed.j 13B 13C pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JIINE 20 1990 PAGE 4 OM TION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to remove the item from the table. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON SETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated staff inet with Mr. Bushey and Mr. George Applebaum on June 6, 1990, to discuss the alternatives to provide additional warehouse space for the Sears store. It was determined that there is adequate space on the parcel to construct a 57 ft. x 150 ft. addition along the south wall of the building. The proposed additian would bring the lot coverage to the maximum of 40g allowed by the zoning code. Ms. McPherson stated there are currently 133 parking spaces on the site, and the addition would eliminate approximately 17 spaces; but an additional five spaces could be constructed along the west wall of the addition. There are cross parking easements between Sears and the old Shorewood shopping center across the street. Currently, the Sears employees utilize the parking spaces directly along the East Moore Lake Drive public right-of-way- Ms. McPherson stated the building expansion would eliminate the ability to drive around the building; however, trucks will still be able to access the site from the east driveway and they will drive through the parking lot and back up to the loading docks. Ms. McPherson stated staff discussed this with the Fire Department staff, and they indicated that because of the access through the Shorewood Inn parking lot, the Fire Department would be able to provide adequate fire protection for the rear of the building. Ms. McPherson stated that in addition to the proposed expansion, Sears is proposing to construct a second loading dock adjacent to the existing loading dock. This would allow them to unload two trucks simultaneously. Ms. McPherson stated Mr. Applebaum is proposing to upgrade the facade on the Sears store with a canopy similar to those canopies on the new office building and the old shopping center. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed expansion would screen the loading activity as well as provide additional warehouse space and will eliminate the need for the five dropped trailers. Z'�►►o trailers will still be necessary to accommodate daily deliveries. These trucks will be adequately screened from the Highway 65 right- of-way by the building expansion itself. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit request with the following six stipulations: 13D PLANNING COMMISS ON MEETING JQNE 20 1990 PAGE 5 1. No more than five trailers at any time shall be allowed to be stored until construction of the proposed additicn begins. � 3. Once the addition is completed, no more than two trailers shall be stored at the loading dock. The warehouse expansion shall . be architecturally compatible with the existing building. 4. The area between the south wall of the expansion and the south property line shall be landscaped with appropriate materials (sod, trees, shrubs, mulch, etc.) in a manner consistent with the remainder of the site. A landscaping plan shall be submitted in conjunction with the building permit application. 5. The 5 foot sidewalk on the west side of the existing building shall be extended south in front of the proposed expansion, and appropriate landscaping shall be installed. 6. Any utilities located under the proposed expansion shall be relocated. Mr. Betzold stated one concern he had is that if it takes Sears a long time to complete the expansion, the existing trailers could be left at the rear of the building indefinitely. What can the Commission do to make sure this expansion project moves forward in a timely manner. Ms. Dacy stated the Planning Commission could recommend adding a time frame to stipulation #1 that is agreeable with�Mr. Bushey. Mr. Bushey and Mr. Applebaum are working together on this expansion. Mr. Bushey stated they are having some difficulty in getting the lease for the space across the street at 1099 East Moore Lake Drive. They will be signing a one year lease with the idea of looking at other possibilities, and expansion is one of those possibilities. Sears is looking at a lot of different sites right now, and the national manager has to approve the site. He should know within six weeks whether the expansion at this site is feasible. He stated that if the Commission wants a time limitation, he can live with that; however, he would ask that he be able to work with two trailers on a continual basis until this is all approved. With the opening of the store across the street, he should be able to get down to two trucks. Ms. Sherek stated she had no problem with Mr. Bushey's x'equest, but they should again table this request until the Sears' corporate �3E pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 20 1990 PAGE 6 office makes a final decision on the site expansion. She would recommend tabling the request for 90 days. The other Planning Commission members were in agreement. o�t TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to table special use permit request, SP #90-06, by Robert Bushey for Sears Outlet Store, per Section 205.15.O1.C.(8) of the Fridley City Code to allow exterior storage of materials on Lot 1, Block l, Shorewood Plaza, generally lccated at 1000 East Moore Lake Drive N.E. , until a final determination is made by Sears' corporate office, or 90 days, whichever comes sooner. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CSAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. Mr. Bushey stated he certain2y appreciated the extra time granted by the Planning Commission. 3. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF A SPECiAL USE PERMIT._ 90= 08. BY JOHN BABINSKI: Per Section 205.17.O1.C.(11) of the Fridley City Code to allow exterior storage of materials on Lots 1 through 20, Central Avenue Addition, generally located at 1290 - 73rd Avenue N.E. oM TION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearir►q. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIBPERSON BET20LD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC BEARING OPEN AT 8:05 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated this request is for the exterior storage of equipment and materials at 1290 - 73rd Avenue. The petitioner occupies the yellow building at the intersection of 73rd and Central Avenues. The property is zoned M-1, Light Industrial, and there is additional industrial zoning to the south and west. The petitioner's site shares a common driveway with the Onan building to the south. In order to screen the outside storage, the petitioner is proposing to construct a fence along the public right-of-way on the east side of the property. Ms. McPherson stated that in 1980, the petitioner was cited for lack of appropriate screening of outside of materials and equipment as required by Code. Recently, Steven Barg, the City's Code Enforcement Officer, has been working with Mr. Babinski to either remove the materials that are currently being stored in the front and rear yards of the parcel or apply for a special use permit. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner does have an existing fenced storage area on the south side of the building. The materials currently being stored within this storage area are listed on Attachment A of the Staff Report. Currently, an old MTC bus is 13F LANNING COMMIBSION MEETING JIINE 20 1990 PAGE 7 being used to store various types of plumbing materials; and, in addition, staff could not determine the direct relation of some materials to the petitioner's lumber contracting business and excavating business. Ms. McPherson stated there is adequate space on the property to construct a 55 ft. x 100 ft. warehouse addition which would give the petitioner an additional 5,500 sq. ft. of warehouse space. In addition to the items within the storage area, there are items that are currently being stored in the front and rear yards. These items are also listed on Attachment A of the Staff Report. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is proposing to construct a solid fence along the east property line which would follow the public boulevard. This fence would allow the petitioner to comply with the screening requirement of the zoning code. Ms. McPherson stated staff was contacted by Woody Nelson of Onan Corporation. Mr. Nelson was concerned that the storage area not be expanded any larger than it is as it can be difficult for Onan's trucks to access their loading docks. The loading docks of the two buildings are staggered so that access and truck parking will not interfere with each other. Mr. Nelson was concerned that any further.expansion of the storage area could interfere with this type of activity and would limit the access to the western loading dock areas. Ms. McPherson stated the special use permit request is consistent with the uses outlined by the M-1 zoning requirements. The proposed fence would allow the petitioner to meet the screening requirements of the zoning code. Staff recomme �ovalh of the Planning Commission recommend to City Council app special use permit request with the following stipulations: 1. The existing storage area shall be cleaned of materials not directly related to the retail lumber and contracting business and shall be used to store only the following items: a. three caterpillars b. one forklift c. one scraper d. pallets e. one crane 2. Vehicles used on a daily basis shall be allowed to be stored outside the storage area. 13G PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JIINE 20 1990 PAGE 8 3. The existing storage fence shall be reslatted. 4. The petitioner shall designate parking spaces at the rear of the building for the tractor trailers currently parked in the front yard. 5. The petitioner shall discontinue outside storage of the following items which are currently stored in the front yard: a. school bus b. motorhome c. trailer 6. The petitioner shall install an 8 foot high wood fence and 3 boulevard trees along the east property line. the fence design shall be approved by staff prior to installation. The boulevard trees shall be a minimum of 2 1/2 inches caliper. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner has advised staff that they might want to pursue constructing additional warehouse space, and the Planning Commission may want to encourage the petitioner to explore that option. Mr. Betzold asked if the petitioner is aware of Onan's concerns. Ms. Dacy stated staff gave a copy of Mr. Nelson's letter to the petitioner. It is staff's understanding that Mr. Nelson is concerned about the expansion of the storage area, and it is staff's intent to limit the storage area to what is existing and not to increase the storage area beyond the existing fence line. Mr. Saba stated he is concerned about the materials being stored on the property. Have any environmental impact or soil tests been done for this area? Ms. Dacy stated that according to the petitioner, the storage area is blacktopped and not raw earth. To staff's knowledge, no soil tests have been done in this area, and that is the reason staff is recommending the area be cleaned up and used only for the equipment needed for the business. Staff has reviewed the stipulations with the petitioner, and he has assured staff that he will separate those materials. Mr. Saba stated there is a storm sewer right outside the storage area. Any contaminants will wash down the blacktop right into the storm sewer. 13H gLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 20. 1990 _ PAGE 9 Ms. Dacy stated there is also a continuing concern about the property next door and the outside storage for a welding and tank operation. If there is any contamination, it is probably coming from that location. The bottom line is that they all want the petitioner's outside storage area cleaned up. Ms. Sherek asked what the zoning code says about outside storage of materials in M-1 zoning districts. Is storage limited to equipment and materials related to the particular business, or can anything be stored outside? Ms. Dacy stated the language for the M-1 zoning district states: "exterior storage of materials and equipment". In another section of the code, it states: "Vehicles directly related to the principal use may be stored in the rear yard if they are screened from the public right-of-way." MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to receive the letter dated June 18, 1990, from Norwood Nelson, Director, Corporate Facilities, Onan Corporation, to Donald Betzold. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON BET20LD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRZED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Frank Kramer stated he is representing John Babinski. He stated Mr. Babinski is willing to clean up the storage area of materials not directly related to the retail lumber and contracting business. Mr. Betzold asked what can be done about any environmental concerns. Is there any City staff that can look into that? Ms. Dacy stated there is no one on staff qualified to do that. In the past, the City has asked Pollution Control Staff to do an on- site visit, and then have the property owner conduct soil tests and/or samples of runoff as it discharges from the site. Mr. Kramer stated that basically all they have stored on the site are tires and smaller tanks. The larger tanks are owned by Determan Welding located next to their property. Ms. Sherek stated if it is the petitioner's intention to remove at least one old truck body and the MTC bus. Mr. Kramer stated they want to explore the possibility of building additional warehouse space. They are a contracting business that installs sewer and water and they do a lot of earthwork. The MTC bus is used to store fittings for their sewer and water contracting business, and they would like to keep the MTC bus. They are prepared to cover it or camouflage it in some way. 131 pLANNING COMMZSSION MEETING, JIINE 20. 1990 PAGE 10 Ms. Sherek stated she is very concerned because she lives in this neighborhood. She asked if it is logically possible to accommodate all the equipment on this site, particularly in the winter time, without parking some of the vehicles either in front of the building or behind the building? Mr. Kramer stated they do have other storage areas for their heavy equipment. Only about 10� of all their heavy equipment is at this location at any given time. He stated they�have removed almost everything from the front parking lot. The reason the trucks are still parked in front is because there is a severe vandalism problem in this area. When the trucks are parked in back, windows are broken, mirrors torn off, etc. In six months, they had 5 broken windows and one broken mirror. Mr. Betzold stated that because of the vandalism problem, maybe it would be more practical and more feasible to build a storage area. Ms. Sherek stated that a slatted fence around the storage area will not help the vandalism problem; in fact, it will probably make it worse, because the vandals cannot be observed from the street. Mr. Kramer stated they would like to discuss with City staff the possibility of a 5,500 sq. ft. storage addition. The addition would be a pole, metal type storage building. The metal building would be more cost effective, and the side facing Central Avenue would be all garage doors so they can back in the trucks off their existing driveway. The other two sides would face Determan Welding and Onan's warehouse side. Before they start drawing up plans, they wanted to first get a feeling from staff and the Commission on whether this type of building is feasible. Ms. Dacy stated there is no specific statement in the code that says metal buildings are prohibited. However, it has been the City's consistent policy that additions are to be architecturally compatible with the existing building. Mr. Kramer does raise a good point about the visibility issue and what is surrounding the proposed addition. She stated that, depending upon the type of metal exterior, it is possible that it might not be offensive. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Dahlberg, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CBAZRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:35 P.M. Mr. Saba stated he would be more in favor of a storage addition than a fenced-in storage area. Ms. Sherek stated she would prefer the storage addition, because it is a more permanent solution than a fence along Central Avenue. 13J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. JIINE 20. 1990 _ PAGE tt Ms. Dacy stated staff, along with Darrel Clark, the Chief Building Official, can discuss the storage addition with the petitioner. Mr. Kramer stated he would be willing to table the special use permit request as long as he can clean up the area, but not eliminate everything until they arrive at a more permanent solution. � Ms. Sherek stated her biggest concern is that the petitioner can have the best intentions of resolving the issue by cleaning up the storage area and putting everything in back. By having a fence which might encourage more vandalism, she can see everything coming back out front again, and that is not a solution to this storage problem. She would like to see the petitioner explore the option of a storaqe addition with staff. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to table special use permit, SP #90-08, by John Babinski, to give the petitioner and staff an opportunity to dis�uss the possibility of a storage building addition. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. 4. PUBLTC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP ,�90 09 BY LEFFEL INCORPORATED FOR MAACO AUTO PAINTING__AND BODYWORKS: Per Section 205.18.o1.C.(12) of the Fridley City Code to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment on Lot 2, Block 4, Commerce Park, and that part of Lot 2 lying in Section 10- 30-24, subject to utility and gas easements as shown on plat and subject to any other easements of record, generally located at 100 Osborne Road N.E. - MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CiiAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED AND THE POBLIC HEARZNG OPEN AT 8:40 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated this property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, with adjacent M-2 zoning on the north, east, and south sides of the property. There is commercial and residential zoning to the west of the property across the railroad tracks. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting a special use permit in order to construct a fenced storage area directly outside the tenant stall of this multi-tenant building. The petitioner has a contract with Shorty' s Towing, which has a contract with the City of Fridley, to tow accident vehicles from accident sites to various 13K pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 20. 1990 PAGE �2 storage areas. The Maaco site would act as a satellite storage area for Shorty's Towing. Ms. McPherson stated the storage area needs to be a secured area; therefore, the petitioner is proposing a chain link fence to fence a 48 ft. x 80 ft. area adjacent to the southeast vall of the building, which is adjacent to Maaco's tenant stall. Currently, the area proposed to be fenced is a green area. The petitioner would not construct a curbcut, but would use a wood ramp to access the storage area. Ms. McPherson stated that while this area is not hiqhly visible from any public right-of-way, staff is still recommending that appropriate screening be required if the Planning Commission recommends approval of the special use permit. Ms. McPherson stated that since the proposed storage area is rela.tively small and is not highly visible from the public right- of-way, staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit to allow the exterior storage of vehicles and equipment with the following two stipulations: 1. Vinyl slats shall be installed for screening purposes. 2. The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall as outlined by the Zoning Code. Mr. Saba stated he would be concerned about accident vehicles stored on a grassy area where there is the potential for oil and antifreeze to leak into the ground. Mr. Dahlberg agreed. Mr. Phillip Leffel stated the vehicles that will be stored in this area are less severely damaged and less likely to be totalled by insurance companies. The reason Maaco is contracting with Shorty's is because Maaco will have a better opportunity to acquire the repair work on these vehicles. If a vehicle is not repairable, it will not be brought to this site. Generally, the only leakage from a damaged vehicle is radiator leakage; and the vehicles are pretty dry by th� time they reach the storage location. Mr. Saba stated he would feel better if at least part of the area was a hard surface area for those vehicles that might be leaking or appear to be Ieaking contaminants. Mr. Leffel stated he could look into the possibility of blacktopping the area with the owner of the property. He stated that based on the experience of other Maaco centers that have done this, they average about 4 vehicles a month, so there would not be very many vehicles on the site at one time. 13L PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. JUNE 20. 1990 _ PAGE 13 Mr. Dahlberg asked if Maaco stores vehicles to use for parts for repairing vehicles. Mr. Leffel stated they production and painting supply the needed parts. do not do that. They are primarily a facility and deal with other people who Mr. Dahlberg stated that if it is acceptable by the owner of the property to blacktop the storage area, the owner may not feel the need for the petitioner to return the storage area to grass, because another tenant might have a need for a blacktopped storage area. Mr. Kuechle stated he did not think a blacktopped area would do what they want it to, and that is to contain any leaking contaminants, such as oil and gasoline. Most of those are solvents and they would either soak into the blacktop, or insufficient quantities go through the blacktop. So, he was not sure this is a valid reason to ask the petitioner to blacktop the area. Mr. Dahlberg stated that a blacktopped surface might be an advantage to Maaco. With.tow trucks coming in and out, the sod area will get worn down rather quickly and it will be dirt and mud when it rains. Ms. Sherek stated the City of Fridley has a standard that they • require parked vehicles to be stored on hard surface areas. Ms. Dacy stated Ms. Sherek is correct; however, an alternative would be to excavate the sod now, put down a plastic covering, and put in class 5 or crushed rock. That would make it easier for the property owner to re-establish the sod. Ms. Sherek asked if classified rock is an acceptable surface for storing vehicles. Ms. Sherek stated that, as Mr. Dahlberg had stated, the grassy area will soon be worn down, and it is going to be a mess in a very short time. The City requires homeowners to store vehicles on hard surface areas, and she did not think the City should allow a business to create a parking lot that is not a hard surface area. It is creating a substandard space that could be a contamination problem in the future. Mr. Leffel stated he had no idea of the cost of blacktopping the area. If it is very costly, it might not be feasible for him to proceed. Mr. Saba stated he could accept the alternative of class 5 or crushed rock with a plastic covering under the rock. The cost would be significantly less. If the Commission is agreeable, he 13M pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 20. 1990 PAGE 14 would recommend another stipulation that the sod surface be excavated, lined with plastic and coated with class 5 gravel. Mr. Dahlberg stated that if this is done, he would recommend the petitioner remove a portion of the curb so the petitioner does not have to use a wooden ramp. O�I TION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PQBLIC BEARING CL08ED AT 9:00 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City Council approval of special use permit, SP #90-09, by Leffel Incorporated for Maaco Auto Painting and Bodyworks, per Section 205.18.o1.C.(12) of the Fridley City Code to allow exterior storage of materials and equipment on Lot 2, Block 4, Commerce Park, and that part of Lot 2 lying in Section 10-30-24, subject to utility and gas easements as shown on plat and subject to any other easements of record, generally located at 100 Osborne Road N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. Vinyl slats shall be installed for screening purposes. 2. The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall as outlined by the Zoning Code. 3. The sod be removed and replaced with class 5 gravel with some type of liner or barrier between the gravel and the ground to protect the ground from leakage. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on July 9, 1990. 4. REVIEW HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) HUMAN SERVICE GRANTS: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to accept and approve the recommendations made by the Human Resources Commission on CDBG Human Service grants and recommend approval by the City Council. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE MAY 10 1990. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES• PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JIINE 20 1990 PAGE 15 MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to receive the May 10, 1990, Housing and Redevelopment Authority minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 6. RECEIVE MAY 17 1990 SPECZAL HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES: O� TION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive the May 17, 1990, special Human Resources Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTZNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED tJNANIMOOBLY. 7. RECEIVE MAY 29 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the May 29, 1990, Environmental Quality and Energy Cotamission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CIiAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. RECEIVE JUNE 7 1990 HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive the June 7, 1990, Human Resources Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CAAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Chairperson Betzold cleclared the motion carried and the June 20, 1990, Planninq Commission meetinq adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully subm' ted, Lyn Saba Recording Secretary 13N � � unroF F�� DATE: TO: C0�1/iMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM June 28, 1990 William Burns, . �' City Manager ; � FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Special Use Permit, SP #90-09, by Phillip Leffel Attached is the staff report for the above-referenced special use permit. The special use permit, if approved, would allow outside storage of materials and equipment at 100 Osborne Road N.E. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. 2. 3. Vinyl slats shall be installed for screening purposes. The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall. The storage area shall be excavated, lined with plastic, and 6 inches of class 5 material shall be installed. Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission action and approve the special use permit request. MM/dn M-90-445 1301 � 13P � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE ��0� p�LqtV�IG CplVhI�SSIpN pq'i� : June 20, 1990 FiZI DLEY c.mr COUNC� DATE : Ju ly 9, 19 9 0 AuTHOR �% dn._._ REC�UEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENStTY PRESENT ZON�lG ADJACENT LAND USES � � Z�i� UTif�'E$ PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPLlCATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREF�IVSNE PLAN COMPATIBILtTY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSiDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION SP ��90-09 Phillip Leffel dba Maaco Auto Painting and Bodyworks Allow outside storage of vehicles • 100 Osborne Road N.E. 167,800 square feet M-2, Heavy Industrial M-2, Heavy Industrial to the East, South, and North; R-1, Single Family Dwelling and C-2, General Business to the West. Yes Yes Approval Approval c — — — � 13Q Staff Report SP #90-09, Leffel Inc. for Maaco Page 2 Request Phillip Leffel of Maaco Auto Painting and Bodyworks is requesting a special use permit for the outside storage of cars related to the auto painting and bodyworks facility. Site This request is located on Lot 2, Block 4, Commerce Park, generally located at 100 Osborne Road N.E. Located on the lot is a multi- tenant building with Maaco occupying the southeastern two tenant spaces. The parcel is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, as are parcels to the east, south, and north. The Burlington Northern railroad tracks are located to the west of the parcel with R-1, Single Family Dwelling, and C-2, General Business, zoning to the west of the railroad tracks. Analvsis The petitioner is requesting that the special use permit be issued in order for him to fulfill contractual obligations with Shorty's Towing. Section 205.18.O1.C.(12) of the zoning code allows outside storage of materials and equipment with a special use permit. Shorty's Towing has a contract with the City of Fridley to tow accident vehicles to a secured area. Maaco's contract with Shorty's allows them to act as a"satellite lot" for Shorty's. The petitioner is proposing to fence a space 48 feet by 80 feet adjacent to the southeast wall of the building, which is adjacent to Maaco's tenant stall. The fence is proposed to be constructed of chain link. Currently, this area is grassed and curbed. While not highly visible from the public right-of-way, staff recommends that appropriate screening be required with approval of the special use permit. Recommendation and Stibulations As the proposed storage area is relatively small and is not highly visible from the public right-of-way, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the special use permit request, SP #90-09, to allow the exterior storage of vehicles and equipment with the following stipulations: 1. Vinyl slats shall be installed for screening purposes. 2. The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall. Staff Report SP #90-09, Leffel Inc. for Maaco Page 3 Plannina Commission Action 13R The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the special use permit request. As a condition of approval, the Commission added a third stipulation: 3. The storage area shall be excavated, lined with plastic, and 6 inches of class 5 material shall be installed. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the special use permit request with the stipulations as amended. � V Sun Belt Business Centers, Inc. April 09, 1990 Philip C. Leffel Maaco Auto Painting 144 Osborne Road Fridley, Mn. 55432 Re: Permission to Construct 40' x 80' fenced lot Dear Mr. Leffel: Main Office 5821-K Midway Park N.E. P.O. Box 27109 Suite 104 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87125 (505) 345-8829 Please allow this letter to serve as confirmation of our telephone conversation whereby Sun Belt Business Centers; Coachman Diversified Joint Venture will allow and has given permission to Maaco Auto Painting to construct a 40' x 80' fenced area on our property. The fenced area must conform to City of Fridley, Mn. construction code requirements and cannot obstruct the parking area in any way. The fence must have slats and if and when Maaco leaves, you will at your expense take the fence down and replace any damaged sod if so requested by Sun Belt Business Centers. The fence must, at all times, be kept in good condition with any damaged or deteriorated areas immediately replaced. Should you have any questions or require additonal information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sin erely, /'�J .°� , - ',6�� Lu ille G. T. John on Property Manager Sun Belt Business Centers, Inc. cc: John M. Good 13S � /O, T. ,�0, R. 24 �f FRIDL£Y �6� ,� �.. �y ti, V�S �� u u NE ��, ec io - -IiVE-IfE--:.-. �- , \\ \ ! � � \�` . \'� `•. ��y � \`': �, �p ,, I i� ` � �` 1 1 ' L2JO) I `1� 1` � � �� . r(rW- V �` � V I �, 1,t 1 � V 1 � �0 M.E. SP 4�90-09 �T Phillip Leffel �.,7 1 11RS K � CO�MtI�iU►� C� TIIEI' AI►EAR W !11E ��/O orflces �ss�uac rrrt . iMIS ORA'•M��'1G 1S TO !f USt REFERENCE NMIOSES 1►NO TY IS HOT I�SIONLbIf f ACCURACtES MEREIN CC 539/G ROlANO W. ♦NDlRSO� � CpUwIY SUfYfYOf �woR� cau+r.. wwo�. LOCATtON MAP SP 4i 90-09 � �" Dh;ll;n Tcffol r \ � �O 9,j, � 0,9 O � • � �i�ir- � � � . �.. . � � �� i i �� i�� SITE PLAN _ __ � � c�nr oF F�a� DATE: r �� COl1�LMUNITY DEVEL�PMENT DEPAR7MENT MEMOR.ANDUM June 28, 1990 F 1`� � William Burns, City Manager �'�' FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator Steven Barg, Planning Assistant BIIBJECT: Consideration of Human Resources Commission Recommendations for Allocation of 1990-91 CDBG Funds for Human Services/Resolution Authorizing � the City to Enter into Contracts with Recipients On June 7, 1990, the Human Resources Commission (HRC) reviewed the CDBG proposals and developed its funding recommendation. An attached table shows eac3� applicant, last year's funding allocations, this year's requests, and the HRC's recommendations. The Planning Commission received the HRC minutes at its June 20, 1990, meeting without requesting changes to the CDBG recommendations. HRC Chairperson, Sue Sherek, will be at the City Council meeting on July 9, 1990, to answer any questions about the recommendations. Attached is a proposed resolution authorizing the City to enter into contracts with recipients of the CDBG funds. Anoka County requires that separate contracts must be signed by the City and the organization for each individual grant awarded. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the HRC recommendations as presented and pass the attached resolution authorizing the City to enter into contracts with each recipient. SB:ls M-90-456 13W HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 1990-91 CDBG FUNDS FOR HUMAN SERVICES Alexandra House A.C. Community Action Program Assoc. for Retarded Citizens Banfill-Locke Center for the Arts Central Ctr. for Family Resources Community Emerg. Assist. Program Family Life Mental Health Center Fridley Senior Center North Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped North Suburban Counseling Center Northwest Suburban Kinship Prog. St. Williams Church Southern Anoka Community Assist. TOTALS Last Year's Allocation $3,500 6,000 1,000 N/A 5,000 1,000 4,034 2,500 1,000 4,034 -0- 1,000 5.000 $34,068 Amount Rewested $4,000 8,279 2,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 2,800 2,800 5,000 2,000 1,000 10,000 $58,379 Amount Recommended $3,500 5,091 1,000 2,500 3,000 1,500 3,000 2,500 -0- 3,000 700 1,000 6.500 $33,291 13X 13Y RESOLUTION NO. -1990 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND RECIPIENTS OF 1990 FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR HUMAN SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS WHEREAS, 1990 Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) monies have been made available to the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS, Anoka Gounty Officials administering CDBG funds require that the City enter into a contract with each provider of services; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of June 7, 1990, the Fridley Human Resources Commission recommended 1990 CDBG funding to human service organizations as listed below; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY authorizes the Mayor and the City Manager to execute agreements between the City of Fridley and the following organizations for the provision of human services in accordance with Federal CDBG regulations: Organization Amount Purnose Southern Anoka Commmunity Assistance ACCAP (Senior Outreach Worker) Alexandra House Central Center for Family Resources Family Life Mental Health Center North Suburban Counseling Center Fridley Senior Center Community Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP) Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) Church of St. William Northwest Suburban Kinship Program $ 6,500 5,091 3,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,500 1,500 1,000 1,000 700 Direct financial Assistance Funding of Senior Outreach Worker Funding of shelter Counseling services Counseling services Counseling services Senior Companion Program Direct financial assistance Funding of preschool program Funding of food shelf Children's kinship program RESOLUTION NO. -1990 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 13Z 13AA CZTY OF lRIDLEY gIIMAN RE80IIRCE8 CO1+II�iIBHZON �[SETING, .TIINE 7, 1990 ...� ............... _...._ � AL.T. To 9RDER : Chairperson Sherek called the June 7, 1990, Human Resources Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. jtOLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Sue Sherek, Sue Jackson, LeRoy Oquist, Marija Netz Paul Westby Steven Barg, Planning Assistant APPROVAL OF MAY 3 1990 AND MAY 17 1990� �N RESOURCES �'OMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to approve the May 3, 1990, and May 17, 1990, Human Resources Commission minutes as written. DPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL oOTING l�YE, CHAZRPERSON BHERER DECLARED THE MOTION C!►RRIED IINANIMOU6LY liND THE MINIITES 71PPROVED 718 �RITTEN. gpPROVAL OF AGENDA: O�'1 TION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Netz, to approve the agenda as written. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� l�LL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BHERER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOQSLY. l. OLD BUSINESS• a. Review CDBG Proposals/Determine Fundinq Recommendatfoas Mr. Barg stated that Lois Doody, Executive Director, of the Northwest Suburban Kinship Program, had called and asked him to convey to the Commission that as of June 4, 1990, the Kinship Program is serving 12 children from Fridley. Mr. Barg stated that at the May 17, 1990, Commission meeting, the Commission had requested information as to whether or not seniors meet the income requirements to - - . . �IIMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEET2NG. JIINE 7- 1990 __ PAGE 2 qualify for CDBG funds. This question was raised regarding the funding request from the Banfill-Locke Center for the Arts. The Center for the Arts was requesting $5,000, 75� to be used for seniors and 25$ for children. He stated that in a conversation with JoAnn Wright of Anoka County, she informed him that seniors are presumed to meet the income requirements unless demonstrated otherwise. Programs designed specifically for children must show proof that the parents involved meet the income guidelines. Mr. Oquist stated he liked what the Center for the Arts do, but he had a little difficulty with the request, because it doesn't seem to fit the CDBG requirements. The Center for the Arts doesn't service people's needs like the food shelves, mental health facilities, crisis clinics, etc. To him, the arts is a"nicety", something people can get along without. Ms. Netz stated she disagreed. She stated the arts does service people's needs. Psychologically disturbed people can be healed through the arts. She felt very strongly about the importance of the arts as human resources. Ms. Sherek stated the initial purpose of CDBG funding was that it was intended to provide seed money for certain projects. On that basis, she would support some kind of funding to the Center for the Arts. Food Shelves and Shelters Ms. Sherek stated SACA made a 100$ increase in its funding request, but she did not think that large an increase is justified, especially when they have less CDBG funds than last year. She would recommend that the Commission recommend funding the emergency food sheZves and shelter at the same levels as last year (SACA - $5,000; St. Williams - $1,000; CEAP - $1,000; Alexandra House - $3,500). Ms. Jackson stated one of the original intentions of CDBG funds was to help organizations fund a project or start up a new program. It was unfortunate to see some of these groups become dependent upon CDBG funds for ongoing programming. Ms . Sherek stated that a good example of this is SACA and ACCAP, who keep coming back to Fridley for funding, but are not broadening their focus for support. With the increasing number of older seniors fn Fridley, she could see the need for senior programs, but she also saw the need for ACCAP to look elsewhere for some of that 13CC -- aN RE80IIRCE8 COl�IISSION MEETING. J�NE 7. 1990 PAGE� support. Her inclination at this point is to recommend funding ACCAP at the same level or slightly lesser level than last year. They need to start lookinq elsewhere for funding, because CDBG funds may end in the near future. Ms. Jackson stated that if they recommend funding to CEAP, maybe they should send a letter to CEAP indicating to them that if they are interested in seeking CDBG funds in the future that the City needs more information, and they should keep records of the Fridley people they serve . Ms. Sherek agreed. They can indicate to CEAP that they believe CEAP is providing a very valuable service and a previously unmet need in Fridley with this request and would like to fund them, but that the City needs more information regarding how much money is given to people, how much is loaned to people, reasons for lending or giving money, and if repayment of these loans is pursued. Ms. Sherek stated she did not have a problem with recommending some funding to CEAP because they are serving a previously unmet need in Fridley, but she would encourage CEAP that if they seek CDBG funding from Fridley in the future that they ask for seed money for a different program. They should be informed that it is not the intention of the City of Fridley to continue to fund ongoing programs. The Commissioners were in agreement with recommending $1,000 for CEAP. €ridle,y Senior Center Ms. Sherek stated that because the Senior Companion Program seems to be getting off the ground fairly well, she would like to recommend funding it again this year; but, for the future, she would like to see them seek permanent funding for that program from another source. The Commission members agreed to fund the Fridley Senior Center at the same level as last year ($2,500). Ms. Sherek stated the Senior Center should be informed that the Commission does like the Senior Companion Program, but now that it is off the ground, they would recommend the Senior Center seek other more permanent funding. If the Senior Center seeks CDBG funding in the future, if the funding is still available, the Senior Center should request funding for new innovative programming. 13DD QMAN RESOIIRCES COMMIBSION MEETING. JIINE 7. 1990 BAGE 4 ACCAP The Commission members stated they are willing to recommend some funding for the Senior Outreach Worker this year. Even though the Commission recognizes the valuable service that ACCAP provides, they see CDBG funds as a fragile source of funds and the Commission encourages ACCAP to find a different permanent source of funding for the Senior Outreach Worker in order to continue to provide this valuable service. Association for Retarded Citizens Ms. Jackson stated there seems to be a need for a support program for parents of disabled preschool children, but she is not real clear how funding will be used. Ms. Sherek stated there is no clear indication that the funds would be used by parents of disabled children with financial needs. She would like to see the CDBG funds used specifically for prcgrams operating in the City of Fridley. If ARC applies for funding in the future, they will have to supply hard income data and how they determined the levels of income. .. Mr. Oquist stated he would like every organization that � is funded this year and seeks CDBG funding next year to keep specific records of what has been done with the CDBG funds and to supply the Commission with that information. The arganizations should also be notified that CDBG funds are not to be used to fund ongoing programs. Ms. Sherek stated that could be a requirement added to the grant application next year so the organizations are aware of it. Ms. Sherek stated that she is willing to recommend $1, 000 to ARC, but next year the Commission wants ARC to demonstrate, by letter, how the $1,000 has been expended to expand the support program within the City of Fridley. Banfill-Locke Center for the Arts Ms. Sherek stated that based on the information received from JoAnn Wright at Anoka County, unless demonstrated otherwise, seniors are presumed to meet the income requirements for CDBG funding. She stated that at the last meeting, the Commission asked Mr. Cassayd-Smith to provide the Commission with information regarding how much tuition monies have been given by the center during the year and how many scholarship monies have been 13EE IIMAN RE80IIRCE8 COMMI88ION KEETING. JQNE 7. 1990 PAGE_� provided. She was disappointed that Mr. Cassayd-Smith had not provided that information. Ms. Sherek stated she is willing to recommend funding for the Center for the Arts, with specific criteria that the funding be used for senior classes per se or a tuition remission for people of any age who meet the income guidelines. Ms. Jackson stated that it is very important for seniors on limited incomes to have places to go in the City of Fridley. She sees the Center for the Arts as another outlet for seniors. She would also be willing to recommend funding, but the funds should go into a scholarship-type program to be used by people who meet the low income guidelines. They can see how much of the funds are used in one year. Ms. Netz stated she served on the Center's Board 5-6 years ago, and they really operate on a shoestring budget. It is run with very little money by devoted people. She would be in favor of recommending funding in the amount of $3,000. Ms. Sherek stated she saw the Center for the Arts as an enriching activity for people. She would recommend $2,500 in funding. Ms. Netz stated she would agree with $2,500. Mr. Oquist stated he would agree with $2, 500 if it is used as scholarship funds for people with low income. Mr. Oquist stated he would like to see the seniors meet the medium to low income guidelines. Ms. Sherek stated that the funding should be used to provide tuition remission to low and moderate income people of any age. A copy of the low and moderate income guidelines should be attached. NSCAH Ms. Sherek stated that for the past two years, the Commiss�on has encouraged Mr. Ellingworth to seek a computer from another source. They have encouraged him to contact vendors or businesses, and she has volunteered to assist him. Mr. Ellingworth has not done that, and he has not contacted her. 13FF - AN RESOIIRCES CO1�'II+iISBION MEETING. JIINE 7. 1990 _ PAGE 6 Ms. Sherek stated she would recommend no fundinq to NSCAH for the following reasons, and NSCAH should be notified of these reasons: 1. NSCAH does not appear to have a clear idea of what they would do with a computer if they got one, and they do not have staff with the expertise to use it. 2. In spite of three years of requesting funding from the City, NSCAH has not seriously sought a computer from any other source or funding from any other source. Even though Fridley is 1/10 of the population of Anoka County and NSCAH allegedly serves all Anoka County, they have not sought funding for the computer from any other source in Anoka County, including community organizations. 3. NSCAH has not demonstrated how the computer would increase their services to the City of Fridley and benefit the low income people of Fridley. The Commissioners were in agreement. ��i";�•�°�* �»�+»*-ban Kinship Proaram Ms. Sherek stated it appears that about 90� of the budget is for salaries. Ms. Jackson stated that if they recommend any funding, they should be informed that before they get any reimbursement, they must demonstrate how many lower income Fridley children were served and how they were served. Ms. Sherek stated she would agree to some funding in recognition of the Fridley children they are serving. Ms. Sherek stated a resolution to the Council should state that the Commission is trying to wean some of the long time organizations from their relianCe on CDBG funding, and the Commission is trying to recognize new and different programs, at the same time trying to meet the needs of the increasing crisis needs of Anoka County through the food shelves, Alexandra House. Alexandra House The Commissioners agreed that a letter to Alexandra House should state that even though the Commission recognizes the valuable service that Alexandra House provides, they see CDBG funds as a fragile source of funds and the 13GG ¢UMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEETING. JIINE 7. 1990 PAGE 7 Commission encourages Alexandra House to find a different permanent source of funding. oM TION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Ms. Netz, to inform the City Council that the Commission is trying to wean some of the long time organizations from their reliance on CDBG funding, and the Commission is trying to recognize new and different programs, at the same time trying to meet the needs of the increasing crisis needs of Anoka County through the food�shelves, Alexandra House. For this reason and the reasons stated in the discussion, the Human Resources Commission recommends to City Council, through the Planning Commission, the approval of the following allocation of 1990-91 CDBG funds: Alexandra House A.C. Community Action Program Assoc. for Retarded Citizens Amount Amount geauested ecommended $4,000 8,279 2,500 $3,500 5, 091 1,000 Central Ctr. for Family Resources 5,000 3,000 Community Emerg. Assist. Program Family Life Mental Health Center Senior Citizen Center 5,000 5,000 2,800 1,500 3,000 2,500 Banfill-Locke Center for the Arts 5,000 2,500 North Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped Northwest Suburban Kinship Prog. St. Williams Church S.A.C.A. 2,800 2,000 1,000 10,000 -0- 700 1,000 6,500 North Suburban Counseling Center 5 LQ�� 3 0 0 TOTAL $58,379 $33,291 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BHERER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED t1NANIMOUSLY. 13HH gOMAN RESOIIitCEB COMMIBSION MEETING. JIINE 7• 199G PAG� Ms. Sherek stated she would like the organizations to be notified of the Commission's recommendations and the specific reasons why and notify them of the Council meeting date when the Council will take final action. Mr. Barg stated these recommendations will go to Planning Commission on June 20 and to City Council on July 9, 1990. 2. �1EW BUSINESS: a. Preseatation of Commission Orientation Manuals Mr. Barg distributed the Commission orientation manuals. Mr. Oquist stated he would like to have a mission statement for each commission in the manual. He stated that if he was a new commission member, he would want to know what each of the other commissions do. Mr. Barg stated he could get that information for the Commission members to add to their manuals. Mr. Barg stated he wanted to compliment the Human Resources Commission, because the idea for the manuals originated with this Commission. He stated staff toak it from there and prepared orientation manuals for all the commissions. b. Consideration of Possible Items for Remainder of 1990 Mr. Barg stated the four items listed as priorities in the Commission's 1990 workplan are the Comprehensive Plan, commission orientation manual, CDBG funding, and senior housing. Ms. Netz stated that she has heard a lot about problems with child care. She wonders if there is any government funding available and what the needs might be for child care in the Fridley area. She is also thinking in terms of women who are trying to get off welfare, but have no place to put their children. She would like to explore the possibility of women who are on welfare, for example, working in child care and helping one another. She would like to explore this issue further. Ms. Sherek stated some child care legislation was passed in the legislative session, but it was passed 1311 �OIz�N RESOIIRCES COI�Z88ION MEETING, JIINE 7. 1990 PliGE 9 c. toothlessly because it was passed vithout fundinq. There are some child care funds available, but the last time the Commission checked into this isOne �ith Anoka County, there were some problems. problem was that Anoka County had opted out of participating with the Federal Child Care proqram. Ms. Jackson stated this is certainly a good issue to explore. If they find there fs a real need in Fridley, maybe someone on the Commission can come up with n project. Ms. Jackson stated maybe some information could be obtained through the Fridley latchkey proqram. Ms. Sherek stated they should maybe start by getting a guest speaker from Anoka County Social Services to tell the Commission what current programs are available to provide reduced child care, particularly to people who are attempting to qet off public assistance, and to let the Commission know if there is'anything they can do to help. Ms. Netz stated that is a good idea. Ms. Sherek stated another issue the Commission had discussed had to do with the issue of employment discrimination and how to qet information out to people, possibly publicizing the various types of discrimination through the Fridley Focus and what people can do if they think they are being discriminated against. Mr. Barg stated he will do some research on the child care issue and might be able to get a guest speaker for the August meeting. They can look at the discrimination issue, and also look at the other issues in the 1990 workplan. Election of Chairperson and Vice-Cbairperson for 1990-91 Chairperson Sherek declared the nominations open fcr chairperson. OM TION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Jackson, to nominate Sue Sherek for chairperson. IIPON A oOICE VOTE� CHAZRPERSON BHEREIC DECLl1RED THE I�tOTION CARRIED. 13JJ UMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEETING. JIINE 7• 1990 P�1GE 10 Hearing no other nominations, Chairperson Shezek declared the nominations closed. Chairperson Sherek declared the nominations open for vice-chairperson. OM TION by Ms. Netz, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to nominate Sue Jackson for vice-chairperson. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, CSAIRPERSON 6HEREK DECLARED THE MOTZON CARRIED. Hearing no other nominations, Chairperson Sherek declared the nominations closed. OM TION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Netz, to cast a ballot by acclamation for Sue Sherek and Sue Jackson for Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of the Human Resources Commission for 1990-91. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� C$AIRPERBON 8H8RER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED. d. Farewell/Recoqnition of Bervice to Human Resources Commissioaer Paul Westby '• Ms. Sherek stated that in his absence, she would like to recognize and commend Paul Westby for his many years of service to the Commission. ADJOURNMENT• OM TION by Ms. Jackson, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to adjourn the meeting. tlpon a voice vote, Chairperson Bherek declarea the June 7, 1990, Human Resources Commission meetinq adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Res ectfully sub itted, Ly Saba Recording Secretary � � cinroF F�� DATE: TO: CO�/IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT M EMO RAN D L[M June 22, 1990 Cit Mana er .Ci �' � william Burns, y g FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant BIIBJECT: Variance Request, VAR �90-10, by Robert Schmidt, 6001 - 4th Street N.E. Attached is the staff report for variance request, VAR #90-10, for Robert Schmidt. Mr. Schmidt is requesting that a variance be granted to reduce the side yard setback from 17.5 feet to 15.5 feet. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the variance to the City Council. As the petitioner has an alternative which would allow him to meet the requirements of the zoning code, staff reconimends that the City Council deny the variance request. MM:ls M-90-443 14 � 14A � STAFF F�EPORT APPEALS �ATE Jtme 19, 1990 CITY OF �aww� coNrurssioN DA� fRlDLEY CfTY COl�1qL DATE July 9, 1990 �r�o� �= REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZON�1G ADJACENT LAND USES & ZONNG UTllTES PARK DEDICATION ANALYStS F�VANCIAL NVtPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREt�J�ISNE PLAN COMPATBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8► ZONIVG ENVIRONMENTAL C►ONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMME�ATiON APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNqVG COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION VAR #90-10 imbert scnmidt Reduae the side o�rner setback frcm 17.5 ft. to 15.5 ft. 6001 - 4th Street N. E. 9,456 sq. ft. 1� 1 Ft-1, Si.ngle Fami2y Dwelling F.-1, Single Family Dwel]ing tA the E, N, S, and Ta Yes Yes Denial Approval 14B Staff Report VAR #90-10, 6001 - 4th Street N.E. Page 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((1)) requires a side yard setback on a corner lot to be not less than 17.5 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to maintain a higher degree of traffic visibility and to reduce the "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Al2owable building space too small to accommodate a usable room." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Rec�uest The petitioner, Robert Schmidt, is requesting a variance to reduce the side corner setback from 17.5 feet to 15.5 feet on Lot 6, Block 3, Bonny Addition, the same being 6001 - 4th Street N.E. S ite A single family dwelling and a two car garage currently exist on the parcel. The parcel is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the north, east, south, and west. Analysis The petitioner is proposing to construct an addition that is 12 ft. by 26 ft. 7 1/2 in. to the south wall of the existing dwelling unit. The south wall of the existing house is a logical plce for an addition to occur, as it continues the current lines of the house. However, the addition could be shortened by 2 feet which would allow the petitioner to meet the zoning code. This would allow for an addition of approximately 260 sq. ft. Recommendation and Stipulations Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the variance request, VAR #90-10, to reduce the side corner setback from 17.5 feet to 15.5 feet as the petitioner could construct a smaller addition and still have a reasonable use of the property if the variance is denied. 14C Staff Report VAR #90-10, 6001 - 4th Street N.E. Page 3 Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the variance to the City Council. City Council Recommendation As the petitioner has another alternative which allows him to meet the code, staff recammends that the City Council deny the variance request. 14D N 1/2 SEC. 23, T. 30, R. 24 C/TY OF FR/OL £Y 21 � 7 12 I 1 N/N COANf�t � ..� � ' � � � L• ,' ��} � `_""'c" 3' � ! //• �" ��' • e _ o _ - .. 7_• �y � ' 3 1• - ! _ ' t r -si • • 1 � � ` � � � , H 2 1f 2 rf z + •. .r.�� ft� i :�a10� I3 �t° �i• ' II 3 / - r• 4p%o Z r : t is ; z � z• � rs _ ' ��l' ♦ ws- I� ! I l' I' ♦ :J J tt.. � ' �. f 'f � `s � 1 � rI '��.i 7f Sf Si 1• --�. � zs � . s a 31' i. z�c � sa a Zs - za •:-^': Z z. :- �. �. + � r�� Y. ; � a�� I �r� r� + • • z• •�'3�"�� - 2t , d ' : �23 +. � tf :l d t! ZJ _- :�i_ ' rs ••, t, Z S� Si �'� = 3 as � zz f zz f zz ? 2 .a � r� s. m r .e z: .t z. ,` � ..� ac ` !u . �;B �f � L •'r t' ♦� t� ,9 :e i: 2� .i te + •_�r... i !,i i ,• !1 I :7 /1 ' il �� .Z .• v" i_i j ,i ,� �� j s-e <,f ' �t c i� �► ;+ ,i s ii s s ;�- .< , :,�� s e �'• � b, tg i n is s .♦ �v .i - � ; � -�: .r :� � � ` n a .♦ / �! a .... ��rl.. .i � '"" .; TM AVENUE :N.E. .� . -, rf' a � .� i,s :i .+_= '; ° >° t •- .,, i'•': �, , : t, r :� .� - . � �_� T e ., _ • - � , j ; z i._ , jZ rs '�'7 :s . J rI •'..f . � y , � F� ,a` � t s� ♦ s+ • I i• r : • � t.. � .•s l, ) t� S 1s f zc 's � ;s '"W . � .f •; � 3 — '-'s • .4. _ � =� N:, >� j � r, o rs ,s :e � rJ :� • J;3 �. • I !I . � z♦ W ♦ 11 + � �� _ j e. / , .o � + � s S if �s I, Ii d � : = ti i dJ W �� rt r zz � _ ,,� yj � ts s. -r .� - '- _ :,�� _ � `' � • 2 Z �'B •5 t, ;e i' �O z: ;. I ' ` `' _ , f •a �'` +` p � • � t. e' ' z� z� 'l � �e '�. a s '.�. ,� 'I 'L 'L �� 1; ' i � y � ; O ' � ' ti' e _ � �! '� � i! i � i/ �i .Y � V. ;% t� y 'r '� y �� fN f I = �7 /� /.• I .I _�_:��:�i � � _ � _ .1 .. � � �.g ��:f �F • 1 t ` _ _ - / /f • 1 PF.E.i _ � S, �2 � h �: � 3._ ,..,,:•, PLACE � _ —3� �i4 . —AYE'N�lE _ �---�---� r---,r--� � r�=-�r-� nr' I za 2 3 i3 `•,�/ Y '•. I rJ10 SBTM r. � . s s . r+lr,� � h b� ELENE �� ; � i . e � +� s L4CATION MAP i + r ; ; ! � N ` , -- o} ti ��r � . �� . . � � , � .. �« N �-, tf'�`� � ,zc�z N . � . ---.. _ ._. .._ _ ... � � =�t'_� . ... - � --- _ . . _ 14F ;. �� . � � ` 3� � , , i ;1� 5 ; � � %�1:i :�► �'% � - - - --.65�. - ..----__- -- � �� C�O ` 4th Street � NDT To SCrqc-.� � �� :�<� F. �u� ; ! �N (�=.> � � � 1�'' � T " t = .. .� • � Ft2�� _ 1� � IIv� � rJ �,� E=� i r1 .�`.i 5 4�3 Z ,.. _. .� � � :�:�'--�-�1 � i.. `' �`..:._� ! .� . � � .; ;j ! d �t � -- - -- -- �--- ... .__.�--.. Z . . o. _ _.. � � :, I SITE PLAN _o � =o �. 0� _ ��$ `�< a� � � 3 �� w i 14G �� f �� oss �� N . 7 t � 0 N � � 3� 8 � .�� s �� .�� ' ~ � � •' �s�� d � �xJ� _ w �±� � i � � a�� ` � �� — oil ee� t � , E��vATioN 14H CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEAL8 COMMZSSION �EETIIda, JIINE 19, 1990 .....�......,......,..._........._.,..,.�.._.,..,..... ........ �ALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Savage called the June 19, 1990, Appeals Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. l20LL CALL • Members Present: Diane Savage, Larry Ruechle, Cliff Johnson Members Absent: Kenneth Vos Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator, Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Robert Schmidt, 6001 - 4th Street N.E. Cathy Smith (new Appeals Commission member) APPROVAL OF MAY 22 1990 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: O� TION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Johnson, to approve the May 22, 1990, Appeals Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BAVAGE DECLARED THE liOTION CARRIED IINANIM008LY. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REOUEST VAR #90-10 BY ROBERT AND SANDRA SCHMIDT: Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(c).((1)) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 15.5 feet to allow the construction of additional Iiving space on Lot 6, Block 3, Bonny Addition, the same being 6001 - 4th Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. O�I TION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Johnson, to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARI2IED IINANIMOtiSLY AND THE POBLIC HEARZNG OPEN AT 7:31 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at the intersection of 60th Avenue and 4th Street N.E. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. The petitioner is proposing to construct an addition to the south wall of the house which will extend the house an additional 12 feet. The petitioner is proposing to continue the existing facade of the house and to continue the existing roofline to accommodate the addition. 141 PPEALS COl'II''IISSION �iEETZNG. 1IINE 19. 1990 __ AGE Ms. McPherson stated that since there is also a two car garage in the rear yard, the south wall of the house is the most logical location for the addition as it does continue the current lines of the existing house. Ms. McPherson stated that because the petitioner could shorten the addition by 2 feet which would allow him to meet the �oning code and still give the petitioner an addition of approximately 260 sq. ft., staff is recommending that the Appeals Commission deny the variance. Mr. Schmidt stated he has owned the house since 1976. His father built most of the homes in this addition back in the late 1950's and early 1960's. This house was called a"starter house". Most of the rooms are quite small, under 10 feet x 12 feet. He has spent approximately $10,000 renovating the house, both the exterior and interior, in addition to building the garage. He is a second generation carpenter so the majority of the work on the house has been done by him. Mr. Schmidt stated the first reason for wanting to go from a 10 foot wide addition as recommended by Planning staff to a 12 foot wide addition is the architectural design. At the present time he has an 8 foot bay window on the front of the home. With the existing spacing on the north side of the bay window, the 12 foot addition would allow them to use an identical bay window of 8 feet with the same spacing on the south side of the existing bay window, as shown on his drawing. Mr. Schmidt stated the 12 foot wide addition would allow for better architectural incorporation into the outside view of the home, and it would also allow for more space inside the house. The proposed rooms would be better facilitated by the addition of 2 feet. The expansion would allow his teenage son to have a larger bedroom and for them to have a fairly large sized family room or combination family/dining room. Mr. Schmidt stated the traffic site lines would not be affected by the 12 foot addition. Mr. Schmidt stated he plans to completely remove the existing siding on the house. He will put on masonite woodgrain siding on the sides and back of the house and a full face of cedar on the front of the house. That incorporates some of the designs already in the neighborhood, so this should blend in very well. Mr. Schmidt stated that when the structure is completed, he intends to replace the entire roof. The approximate total completion date would be August 15. Mr. Schmidt stated he has contacted 11 neighbors and explained his proposed addition. He stated he has received no objections. appEALB COMMI88ION MEETING. JONE 19. 1990 PAGE 3 Ms. Savage stated that if the variance request is denied, what affect would this have on Mr. Schmidt's plans. Mr. Schmidt stated he had considered not havinq to apply for a variance, but he was looking at a maximum room size of 9 ft. x 6 in. The 10 ft. width is just not qoing to work, so he is not really considering anything smaller than 12 feet. He stated he has talked to people who sell construction praducts, and with the smaller width, they would be wastinq approximately 2 feet. The twelve foot width works out well for the way window and siding products are sold as far as lengths, particularly the cedar siding. MOTION by Mr. Johnson, seconded by Mr. Ruechle, to close the public hearing. DPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, C$AIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED AND T8E PIIBLIC BEARING CLOSED AT 7:45 P.M. Mr. Kuechle stated that without seeing the total house, it is difficult to say what could or could not be done. However, he did agree that a 10 foot wide addition is marginal at best. For that reason and the fact that the variance is only for 2 feet, he would be inclined to recommend approval of this variance to the City Council. There is still 30 feet between the street and the side of the house. Ms. Savage stated she agreed. It is a minimal variance request, and the spirit of the code is still being met by the plan as proposed. Mr. Johnson stated he also agreed. It sounds as though Mr. Schmidt is going to do a major rework of the entire structure. When he is finished, it will not look like an addition has been added but will look like part of the original house. The addition will make the house more aesthetically pleasing, especially with the matched windows. He did not feel the 2 feet would cause any obstruction problem. OM TION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Johnson, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, VAR, �90-10, by Robert and Sandra Schmidt, pursuant to Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(�)•((1)) of the Fridley City Code to reduce the side yard setback on a corner lot from 17.5 feet to 15.5 feet to allow the construction of additional living space on Lot 6, Block 3, Bonny Addition, the same heing 6001 - 4th Street N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINQ AYE, CSAIRPERSON BAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on July 9, 1990. 14J 11,PPEALB COMMISSION KEETING. JIINE 19. 1990 PAGE 4 �DJOURNMENT• �lOTION by Mr. Ruechle, seconded by Mr. Johnson, to adjourn the meeting. IIpon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Chairperson Savaqe declared tbe June 19, 1990, Appeals Commission �eetinq adjourned at 7:5o p.m. Respectfully s mitted, Lyn Saba Recording Secretary 14K � � cinroF fRlDLEY C0111'iMUNI"['Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June.28, 1990 � �• TO: William Burns, City Manager �'� FROM: SUBJECT: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Variance Extension Request for Wayne Johnson; 6051 - 3rd Street N.E. On May 10, 1988, the Appeals Commission approved a variance request to locate Wayne Johnson's proposed garage 1 foot from the rear lot line, and 3 feet from the side lot line (see attachment for stipulations). Because of the legal complications regarding the vacation and sale of the alley to the rear of the Johnson property, it was impossible for Mr. Johnson to comply with the one year time frame to construct the proposed garage as permitted by the variance. Therefore, Mr. Johnson is requesting a one year extension to August 1, 1991. Staff has been working with Mr. Johnson to complete the final details required by the variance and vacation approvals. Depending on the length of the proceeding subsequent process at Anoka County, he may not be able to start construction until next spring. Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council approve an extension of the variance approval to August 1, 1991. BD/dn M-90-462 15 � ,. � CtTYOF FRtDLEY 15A CIV1C CENTER • 6�31 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MiNNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450 . . •� u�u �,► : M �,� : .��i� ►,�/ r� Wayne Jehnson 6051 - 3rd Street N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 rr�y i9, ��as On Tuesday, May 10, 1988, the Fridley Appeals Ca�anission officially approvec3 your request for a variance, VAR �86-06, to reduce the rear yard setback from 3 feet to 1 foot and to reduce the side yard setback fram 5 feet to 3 feet to allow the construction of a 20 ft. by 40 ft. garage on lots 25 and 26, Block 5, Hyde Park Addition, the same being 6051 -3rd Street N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. Drainage between the two properties, 6061 - 3rd Street N.E. and 6051 - 3rd Street N.E. to be worked out to the mutual satisfaction of both property owners and the City F�gineering Departsnent. 2. The variance to be contingent upon the approval of the vacation and the stipulations placed on the vacation approval. If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call the Planning Department at 571-3450. Sincerely, , f , Lti '.^�'v Drarrel Clark Chief Building Official Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below, and return cne oapy to the City of Fridley Planning Departinent by June 2, 1988. � Concur with action taken � � C�TY OF FRlDLEY DATE: TO: CO1NLMlINITY DE�JELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM June 28, 1990 William Burns, City Manager �4�, T" FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Steven Barg, Planning Assistant BIIBJECT: Nuisance Abatement at 501 Glencoe Street N.E. In late May, I met with a complainant concerning numerous bags of solid waste at the rear of the above referenced property. Since that time, I have made numerous attempts to locate the owner of this vacant residence by mail and telephone, but I have been unsuccessful in finding the appropriate individual. 0 On June 18, 1990, I posted a notice on the property indicating that this public nuisance needed to be removed within 10 days. However, the problem remains, and it could easily create a health and safety hazard to the neighborhood. At least four different residents in the area have expressed their concern to me over this situation. According to City Code 110.04, the City Council can authorize the abatement of the nuisance and recover the removal costs plus 25� for administrative expenses. If not paid by the property owner, this amount is assessed against the property. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council authorize staff to execute the abatement of this nuisance as outlined in City Code 110. SB:ls M-90-464 � l� - OUSING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 17 COMMISSION MEMBERS: 1.AWRENCE COMMERS, CHARMAN �UANE PRARE VR GNIA BCMNABEL �M �� SMUSSEN JOHN MEYER �CITY OF FRIDLEY DATE: June 28, 1990 � �� To: William Burns, City Manager�� FROM: Jock Robertson, Executive Director of the HRA SUBJECT: Establish Public Hearing for Consideration of Establishing a New Tax Increment Financing District #11 for the Redevelopment of the Northeast Quadrant of University Avenue and Mississippi Street Attached is the Housing & Redevelopment Authority's motion of April 18, 1990. Among other actions, they recommended that the City proceed with giving notice for a public hearing to consider expanding the redevelopment area by creating TIF District #11 for the two easterly lots (see attached map) of the proposed development by Fridley Town Square Associates. Staff recommends that the City Council establish July 23, 1990 as the public hearing for considering the above action. JR/dn M-90-466 EXECUTIVE OIRECTOR: JOCK ROBERTSON d4S 1 UNIVERSITY AVE. (612) 671-S4b0 FRIDLEY, MN 6b432 � HO�SING % REDEVBI,OP1rIEIdT AOTHORITY l�t'PG.. 11PRIL 18. 1990 — PAGE 11 Mr. Robertson stated staff also asked Barton-Aschman to qive an opinion on the worst case scenario; for example, a 200,000 sq. ft. office building on the southwest quadrant. It is Mr. Koski's opinion that it miqht require two left turn lanes on eastbound Mississippi at the intersection. Mr. John Flora, Public Works Director, said that could be handled with the existing lane configuration. Mr. Robertson stated that made him more confident that the project would not interfere with the iII2A's options on the southwest quadrant. Mr. Robertson stated that, based on these findings, staff recommends the HRA consider the following: 1. Approval of this specific development plan to the Planning Commission for a public hearing for rezoning of the parcel to S-2. 2. Concept approval for preparation of a$300,000 (approximate) pay-as-you-go redevelopment agreement to be fine-tuned and brought back to the HRA at a later meeting. 3. Recommend staff proceed with the process to give notice for public hearing to expand the TIF district from the existing 10,000 Auto Parts site to include the two additional single family houses immediately to the east. MOTION by Mr. Rasmussen, seconded by Ms. Schnabel, to: 1. Approve this specific development plan to the PZanning Commission for a public hearinq for rezoning of the parcel to S-2. 2. Give concept (approximate) be fine-tuned meeting. approval for preparation of a$300,000 pay-as-you-go redevelopment agreement to and brought back to the HItA at a later 3. Recommend staff proceed with the process to give notice for public hearing to expand the TIF district from the existing 10,000 Auto Parts site to include the two additional single family houses immediately to the east. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, FOIIR MEMBERB VOTING AYE, 1LBY8R VOTING NAY� CHAIRPERSON COIrIIdERB DECLARED THE KOTION CARRIED BY !1 VOTE OF 4-1. Mr. Commers stated the I�tA is looking forward t however, he hoped the developers would keep in , concerns addressed by the iIItA members. Thi Center City project and it is important to the o workinq with UCD; mind the issues and s is part of their HRA. 17A - EXHIBIT II—B , ,_' � �'� • .. _r `� :. : " • c ��it e� �r � � � .:' .� _ ' • 4e;. :. � � �`•�`l 1- �„' •'%'' :: i� �• f • � � ' W � l� +• = �-' . �� :� ��.• � • !. M �� '�� r �,�.. . :I i � ; ' •.� \ � � �,i. ¢ e O:~ Q v = . j �. -� :� " 't 'h,. '� ��- �; : ! �i 't' :, ` '�• � �� /,�; . . • . ��,i , �•• � . .� �� ! � ,� ' � � `� \ �• `, '. • � ✓ Y ( `' �t ' �. • t M n f t = �' � �1' , °�. r �'' ' � j � .:-' .j �� '�\\ ' ' • I • � .• � f Sv �/, e4, • .ti, I,�.Yi� �'' 4 • \�� 1 � I .�N `� r, \`� ` , �' �\ • • ` • �' ' . � 1 � � ' i i �:�.,a�� a , :�� . �. �Cq�a� P � I�r'' . . � � � 1 j `�',� � �{�•` ; . /`'as a � • � ��' ;I:I � .� � •��J• �r �, � � B I' ;� � � , �: ' ';, „t'� o ty ' .+��' , �� r.=. . •' , �/ ,1`r:r • . • ,,. .. �� , � - I :� j , ♦ , t k �.. - .!\ �.. . � ;. .'C , � , � , �:,; 'r i � . : �., � , , ,� � . �. � ,y • � .I^� •' I .` � • / \ \ +V• � � •� •�� A �` ! � �T� � ,�, � ` ' r� .�-{•�.� �.� %' � ••�, -� s .�� • ( �. h,• �.. �.. I r '^" � h �' 1 , � � w• (-�, �„ � • � + �� " � �l� : i `� � �� c 1�� `i / � 1 ' � r: P�L •� •� '� • ...� � p� 1 , ! .. . • � +' f �'1; .r "'�' ••. t i :�' • i I � ��I.�_�r �. �• � . W `�• ♦ f '� Q �1� ♦ ' �t " �. � � . �� J =. •:, I�' 2 �� . y � ; ;; �� N. ,L' ��, � ' :�.' , � �• ` � a / � � � �• • .,. ,Q�,r r� •L � � 2 � J ► � ��i''yt r . , .. i)�.�, 1��'' !7�♦ •�� '�•/' ,�.Y,� �� i �� N �J /'��•T d.'. . ; .• �•�' �� r ;� � �i.s�• •7i1. •� �• ��••� Iv•'�-� I�I I . 2 • �i�% MI' •_ , �� . ' � � . ,� t�' �• �i •• � t �/♦ �i ji ,�•'/• ''� r�� '� '� � �I' 1 �• ` � .��'�,,� �.. � = � 'i' ��•..' •_�� •„� �^, {}� �iJl � ,- •• _ ' ,., i : � i •='� • . b��: ,v, ' , �' j ' 6� AVE. N.E. • { � . u � +� � �. /� �'3 f'• f• • ' I f �..� i J — � � � � � i5� ! � . i .� il� .) � .i� q .��•� K ' , ,t' �• j �� s ' � ' W �., _ �t M I � h Rl�� •� . :�. �2• ;. -' : �.� °��E'K� � ' � ':� :.^; Z � ;' i , � � • . I i ., •� j � , ., . ; . , � , � s ��• '• W �'66yTM 'AVE. N.E. . � aw a..+r�i� " .'[ w w» ' ' j. � : 1 / ; ' � i ' : , ; . • • � :... ~�� ,. ` p� , j ,'� .;s� '� PCAT. ��: .,:;. � 1 � �^ Z .a �' � '~ . • ��, •�' , 7 ; C � I � � •� � .( � • � � • � ' ��ii�....�+�1e, W «' � . �. � � � > ' . • . • •� . •. . � r .i • _ •�.� , � ; �� i •;�.c « , ,4, _ _ • .� � i � �C � - �'� �CR£EK � • _ � . T a � . . ,' -�, � r .. ' � �� : � "s'�^°.n`' _ , '—�rr--'+; - Y oour+Txk-- �;� sT�TeT't�'„A��YNIGF�AY'• •• :'N j O � � � � ;. I � � . _ , � �Y ' i`��, `r, rT : • ! ' f � fj♦ �, I �� + � ' � . LyAN � '' .-,i: . : ' � �� + � - �. ; � .; �°, ' � 't •.� , SY .6s � � "; ,; : , • ;_ i.: ;D .�' �� ,�. Itls . `' .+� -; � � �=--�FR��LE , ,, b �;�� - " '. �p �, � ; �,1 _ �,x � � ,;_ ¢ , - ,i ,. � � a 'r �. .d �--'r— • n„ : i. � � . SrLVAN .. . �2 Lpt ' y =�- � s- �'� �av-''"�'--' ' ' :i �%°'' .. �. . . .^ Q P � , . , ;*� . i. . : SY� - - �� "��. �� =v;fk •' �!i ^�„ �j •` {•"•/j/'�," :,' /�-�J� . p � . HI `�' � f � (�j� � `+�. + ,p ° N �t � i �� «= �7Y.,�r .�"� %� yp 1 � • � . � i�i� � ; �: . T g .�a L �fi � PL x �y� •- t • �. ' � : A ' . - ;. E�uTE � "-. �a�E , � ` � ' , P "�':�-'# , ucE�,�., y�' • „� ; � �� . i S 1 • � � V�� . i � . ' •' . � ' �. �` )• . ..,/.:� . � z ��/ 1 .. • • �� . �� - .it� �j I� � � � � . • .� • 1�•� ,, • _ '�' `= 1 '�' � \ �/l,��N .u• r • f �.:.�. . �' ' •� �'. . .. . . - ' . A � � • v , t ..J .. �''� '�� • � `,\,"� '... Jb .. .,��. � J��. ��•`• �'• i � �R,2 � ; yxf��r� .w' � . ♦ �' .I � • � i ' .d" �.. ';•� ; � !' CENt � i %�ijT� ;r .. mw� e �� ME/►CUAY . oarvE . .., , � � , � .»%� • , . ,:�� , , ,•,•,- . • ', ' " y� I . � � '.; r. ; , � � � ,...... :...,.. • . • . . . . � .� . t �• / t . %.' ' � .• � .� . 'r . � � a►i �r w� • r ' ! 1 • t � .�. ' � • ' � /I1� � , • , J .1'% • • ..� , /, . 1 4 A� � ��I � � ( : � � • � . . � � iCr.► • r�� 1 _•Y i r L�� -�, -(-. � �! �- } • AU k ORS •.; . 't, .r2 . ' � ' —_�_l ---- --l�r+E—:a::. ,�- __ " _.! � �r.'W ., '• •., ' � � � V w �-�j '.4 T ti-a.: '�' _ . � . �/ . . . . ' � V . .y . t ► • � A • . � � . • • � ' �-� � �. Existing Center City Tax Increment District k � • � � Proposed Tax Increment District # 11 1� 17B � c•; CITY OF FRIDLEY I�IB1dORllNDIIM ,��, TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �;�'� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SIIBJECT: REVENIIE BONDB� MINNESOTA MIINICIPAL INDIIBTRIAL DBVELOPMENT ACT, FOR THE LONG TBRM CARE FOIINDATION DATE: JIINE 29, 1990 Attached is some background information we received from Mr. Dale M. Thompson, President, Health Dimensions, Inc., regarding the issuance of 501(C)3 Tax Exempt Revenue Bonds for the Long Term Care Foundation. They are requesting the City Council call for a public hearing on July 23, 1990 for the proposed $1,150,000 bond issue. U N- 2 9- 9 0 H D I M E N S I O N S H EALTH DIMENSI�NS, iNC. 115 North Dellwood • Cambridge, Minnesota 55008 �une 28, 1990 Mr. Richard D. Prihyl Director of Finance City of Fridtey 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mr. Pribyl: • � (6�2) 689•1162 Rod Pakonen has asked me to write you a letter summarizing the program for which 7he Long Term Care Foundation is requesting the issuance of �1,150�000 in Nursing Home Revenue Bonds by the City of�Fridley. More specifically� the request of the Long Term Care Foundation is for the City of Fridley to enter into a Joint Pawers Agreement with the City of Minneapoiis and twelve other municipalities in the metropolitan area to issue a total of approximately 542.9,million,to finance the acquisition of 18 nursing home facilities. While the C�ty of M�nneapol�s, in which five facilities are located wi11 be the issuer af the bonds, S1�I50,000 wi11 be allacated for the purchase of the lynwood Health Care Center. This structure is being recommended by bond council for the sole purpose of reducing the number of legal bond documents. Without the Joint Powers Agreement, this financing would require 14 separate bond transcripts, one each from the 14 municipalities in which these facilities are located. The purchaser of the Lynwood Health Care Center and 11 other nursing homes is The Long Term Care Foundation, a non-profit corporation. The by-laws of the non- profit corporation state that the directors of thls corporation must be employees of hospitals associated w9th the Voluntary Hospitals of Amerlca and/or persons who have a recognized expertise in the delivery of long term care. Of the five members who constitute the Board, three members hold high management positions in VHA-affiliated hospitais and two members� who� in addition to being Minnesota residents, have long term relationships to the Minnesota long term health i�dustry. ihe Long Term Care Faundation intends to contract for the management of the individual facilities with a joint venture consisting of Nealth Dimensions, Ync., a Minnesota based long term care management company and VHA Long Term Care, Inc., which is a subsidiary of Voluntary Hospitals of America specializing 9n the management of nursing homes and retirement facilities. Both organizations have demonstrated levels of expertise which are more fully described in the booklets we have already distributed to you. There two organizations� at the direction of The tong Term Care Foundation, wi11 be responsible for the day-ta-day operations af the 18 facilities� and will be vicvo�iiv� J U N— 2 9— 9 0 F R I 1 2� 3 0 H E A L H D I M E N S I O N S P- 8 3 • .. Mr. Richard Pribyl June 28, 1�990 Page 2 responsible for developinq the marketing programs and referral systems that will result in higher occupancy levels for the 1.8 facilities. It is the goal of the joint venture management qroup to increase the occupancy to 95% of capac�ty from the current level of �0-80�. In closing, i wau7d also like to say that the City of �Fridley's participation in this program is to act as a conduit to permit the acquisition to be financed at interest rates that can be supported within the reimbursement regulations of Minnesota's Medicaid system. The City has � obligatian to make any payments for the 6onds and the sole source of payment for the bonds is the revenues of 7he Long Yerm Care Foundation. ihank you for the cor�sideration that yaur city cauncil and you are qiving to this request. If you have a�y questions� please do not hesitate to tall me at 444- 9881 or Rod Pakonen at 343-1301. We are also looking forward to visiting with your city council about this very worthwhile project. Sincereiy� �`y"' '�- / ' , • rs (Dictated but not read} Dale M. 7hompson President DT%rs dt1-0528.hdi cc: Rod Pakonen Enqineenng Sewer Water Parks Streets Mamtenance MEMORANDUM . •� � . 90-251 To. William W. Burns, City Manager,�. PW FROM: DATE: John G. Flora/�Public Works Director June 27, 1990 BIIBJECT: Change Order No. 1 for Construction Of the 1.5 MG Elevated Water Reservoir Project No. 201 Within the contract specifications for the construction of the 1.5 MG elevated water reservoir, the City is responsible for testing of the soil and construc�ion materials. Accordingly, we obtained proposals and selected Twin City Testing to do the soil testing at the water tower site and also to evaluate the bearing strength of the test piles associated with the foundation of the elevated tank. The soil testing provided the bearing strength and design for the pile and footings and amounted to $4,685.00. The evaluation of the three (3) test piles is a lump sum not to exceed $2,900.00. Associated with the construction of the tank was the removal of the metal storage building which was on the site. Again, we obtained proposals and were able to dispose of it for an amount of $1,800.00. Change Order No. 1 identifies the additional costs to prepare the site and provide the test data for the erection of the 1.5 MG elevated water reservoir tank. 19 Recommend the City Council approve Change Order No. 1 for Construction of the 1.5 MG Elevated Water Reservoir Project No. 201 for an amount of $9,385.00. This change order is within the original $1.5 million estimate for the project and funds are available within the Water Utility Fund. JGF/ts Attachment • 19A CITY OF FRIDLEY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSZTY AVE., N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 July 9, 1990 Twin City Testing 662 Cromwell Avenue St. Paul, Mn 55114 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1, Construction of The 1.5 MG Elevated Water Reservoir Project No. 201 Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the Construction of the 1.5 MG Elevated Water Reservoir Project No. 201 by adding the following work: Additions• ITEM 1. Soil testing 2. Pile testing Twin City Testing APPROX. OUANTITY 1 3 PRICE Lump Sum Lump Stun 3. Building demolition Independent Disposal 1 Lump Sum TOTAL ADDITIONS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS: AMOUNT $4,685.00 2,900.00 1,800.00 $ 9,385.00 Original Contract amount. . . . . . . . . . . $1,222,200.00 Contract Additions - Change Order No. 1. .. 9,385_.00 REVIBED CONTRACT AMOIINT $1.231,585.00 Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, on the 9th day of July, 1990. Prepared by � Checked by ' 2�/j ;.i �— o G. Flora, P.E. _ rector of Public Works Twin City Testinq Chanqe Order No. 1 July 9, 1990 Approved and accepted this day of , 1990, by TWIN CITY TESTINQ Approved and accepted this day of , 1990, by CITY OF FRIDLEY William J. Nee, Mayor William W. Burns, City Manager . - Engineenng Sewer Water Parks Stree�s Ma�ntenance MEMORANDUM � �4 • TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�� PW90-260 FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director DATE: June 29, 1990 SIIBJECT: Change Order No. 3 for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 Gammon Brothers, Inc. is completing the work associated with 51st Way and East River Road. This is the final portion af the street improvements project that were started in 1989. Based upon the delay in the project and after considerable discussion with the City Attorney, we have agreed with Gammon Brothers, Inc. to receive a$2,000.00 deduction in the construction costs as a result of the completion date adjustment. Recommend the City Council approve Change Order No. 3 to Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2. JGF/ts Attachment 20 / � CI[YOF FRIDL�1( CITY OF FRIDLEY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE., N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 July 9, 1990 Gammon Brothers, Inc. 13845 Northdale Blvd. Rogers, Mn 55374 SUHJECT: Change Order No. 3, Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 by adding the following work: Deduction: �TEM APPROX. OUANTITY I E 1. Completion date adjustment Lump Sum $2,000.00 TOTAL DEDIICTIONS - CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS: �i��•1i��9 �� sa.000.00 Original Contract amount. . . . . . . . . . . .$670,628.34 Contract Additions - Change Order No. l. ... 23,595.00 - Change Order No. 2. ... 18,227.50 - Change Order No. 3. ...[ 2.000.00) REVISED CONTRACT AMOIINT $710.450.84 Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, on the 9th day of July, 1990. Prepared by Checked by �///� � n G. Flora, P.E. irector of Public Works � 1 � Gammon Brothers, Inc. Change Order No. 3 July 19, 1990 1 : Approved and accepted this day of � 1990, by GA1�II+ION BROTHERB Richard Gammon, President Approved and accepted this day of . 1990, by CITY OF FRIDLEY William J. Nee, Mayor William W. Burns, City Manager CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R A N D II M 21 � �, TO; WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �,� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOI2 PAIIL 8. HANBEN, ACCOIINTANT SIIBJECT: REVISED BCHOOL DISTRiCT/REFERENDIIM LEVY AGREEMENTS DATE: JIINB 26, 1990 Attached you will find a copy of the 1990 School District referendum levy agreements, revised at the HRA Commission's request, for Independent School District No. 11, 13, 14, and 16, respectively. This is submitted for your discussion and approval at the July 9th, 1990 council meeting. The sole effect of the changes is to reduce the term of these Agreements from two years to one year, that is, so that they would only apply to the tax increment relating to the payable 1990 property taxes. The purpose of the change is to review these arranqements on a year-to-year basis and, accordingly, the matter will be taken up again this fall for the increment relating to the payable 1991 property taxes. Also attached is a copy of the 1990 estimated return amounts. The amount of the return is $261,798.81 for all school districts. This Agreement is by and between the Cit School District No. 11, 3096 AGREEMENT dated as of , 1990, is y of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent and provides as follows: 1. Defi itions. As used in this Aqreement, the following terms have the followinq meanings, respectively: "�itv" means the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "�A" means the Housinq and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "�roiect" means Redevelopment Project No. 1 established and operated by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "1985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's $4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1985, dated May 1, 1985. „�imited Revenue Note" means the HRA's $5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated December 20, 1985. "�985 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated December 30, 1985. "�986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of Auqust 1, 1986. "�990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $9,485,000 General Obligation Tax Zncrement Refunding Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990. "Tax Increment Obliqations means the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual obligations of the HRA or the City which were entered into prior to the date of this 21A Agreement and which commit the use of any tax increments from the TIF Districts for specified purposes, projects, or parties. "Tax Increment Act" means Minriesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179. NTIF Districtsp means Tax Increment Financinq District Nos. 1 through 10 within the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains certification dates and other information on the TIF Districts. "School District" means Independent School District No. 11, the Anoka School District. "�ubdivision" means Minnesota Statutes Second 1989 Supplement, Section 469.177, Subdivision 10, as amended by Laws of Minnesota 1990, Chapter 604, Article 7, Section 24 (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B) . 2. Recitals. (a) In certain cases, the Subdivision either requires or allows by aqreement certain tax increments attributable to school district referendum tax levies to be paid to school districts. (b) A portion of TIF District No. 3 is located within the boundaries of the School District. (c) None of the property within TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 is located within the boundaries of the School District. (d) It is the purpose of this Aqreement to provide for payment of certain tax increments to the School District pursuant to and in accordance with the provision of the Subdivision. (e) Nothing in this Aqreement is intended to violate the covenants and aqreements heretofore made respecting the application of 3096 2 21B 21C tax increments from the TIF Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment Obligations. 3. Re�resentations of the Citv. (a) The Tax Increment Obligations were issued to finance various activities of the HRA within the Project. (b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the HRA. Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1 through 5 are pledged to the payment of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other sources of funds pledged to the payment thereof. The final scheduled principal maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February 1, 1999. (c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a general obligation of the City or the HRA and is payable solely from tax increments pledged for such purposes from TIF District No. 6. (d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds was February 1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying all then outstanding principal thereof and interest thereon. (e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000. However, the City has advance refunded the 1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to said refunding that all of the principal of and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have been paid on or before February 1, 1994. (f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1, 2009. (g) Portions of the principal of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds, and 3096 3 21D the 1990 G.O. Bonds were outstanding on May 1, 1988, and/or are outstanding on the date of this Agreement. 4. Representations of the School District. (a) On Octaber 5, 1982, the electorate of the School District approved a continuous 6.0 mill levy first effective for the 1982 payable 1983 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1982 Levy". (b) On October 6, 1987, the electorate of the School District approved a 6.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1987 payable 1988 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1987 Levy". (c) According to the Minnesota Department of Education, for purposes of the above- mentioned referendum levies the tax capacity rate equivalent of 6 mills is .06999697. 5. Payment of Tax Increments to School District. The City and the School District hereby agree that, except as otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the tax increments relating to the 1989 payable 1990 property taxes, as follows: TIF District No. 3. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 3 which is attributable to the 1982 Levy and the 1987 Levy shall be paid to the School District. 6. Further Aqreements. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the extent but only to the extent that the application of the terms of this Agreement would give rise to a violation of said obligations and covenants, including without limitation, the default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or obligations. Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the City or the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts. 3096 4 In addition, the City and the School District agree that the provisions of paraqraph 5 providing for payment of tax increment to the School District shall be limited to and shall apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1989 payable 1990 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion of said period, the City and the School District agree to review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good faith such further agreement or agreements as may be permitted by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School District with respect to discretionary payments of such applicable tax increment to the School District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. 3096 CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11 School Board Chair Superintendent 5 21E E)Q�iIBIT A Schedule of Tax Increment Financing Districts Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA TIF District 1 2 3 4 3096 5 6 7 8 9 10 ame Center City Moore Lake North Area Johnson Printing/ Skywood Mall Paschke Lake Pointe Winfield Shorewood Onan/Old Central Northco Phase III Certif ication Date 5/11/79 7/31/81 5/19/82 1/20/84 3/15/84 12/24/85 10/22/86 10/24/86 9/7/89 4/10/90 Ir►dependent School District No. 14 13/14 11/ 16 13/ 14 16 13 16 14 16 16 21F . 21G EXHIBIT B Sec. 24. Hir.r.esc:a Sttt�tes Secc�d 19og e_Ypie-.ent, sect'_c� <63.? i7, snbdivisioz 10, :s �-.e.^.2ed :o read: 5:::^d. ?0. (?AY!!=.`:i :O SC-OC'L :Qi �E:=�c!'v�i;}i L:Vi.) (a T.':e flrcvis'_c-s c° t?�is sLboivisic� erply to t�x i:,cze.;.e .t fi^a-cir.g 6is:r:cts ar.d pro�ects fcr �hic'� c�rt_f:catic� �as IECL'ESLEa teFC:e Kay �, 15E8, t}:at aze lecated in a scFOOl o:str:c: _� :;�:c� ;�e �•oters have a:pzoved r.eu tax capacity rates er aa - li:CI225B =:� ttX Ct:eCltj� l2.E5 after Lt:2 �LX increser.t fii.2^C1A9 distr?ct 4�s certified. �b) (1) If there are.no outsta^6i.^.g bo�CS o� Hay 1, 1988, —' - } to -`��ci ir.cre-.er.t frcr.► t::e district is ple�ced, or {?} if t.:e refe:e-c�� is �pLrcved after Hay 1,' 1�E6, a�d t*�ere are r.o bo��s cLts�a;:d--g at t}:e ti �e t}:e zefere.*.cu:� is a�proved, t��t �eze iss�ed be_c:e Hay 1, 19E8, e:-f3�--_'-`Le':e?eee-d�a-:ae:eaei'9 :' -: -ac-tY-:a:e-�ao-ac�rered-rcte:_t':e-r..ost-eeee:::--��=e r.n ax-ee_ _ e=-:er.ee -±o-xL:e�-_.•.eee-.e��-e"C.:.-�ie-e:etetC=-:�-'rieeeed:--ie eianae-{=j-ee-{2i-a��==ee; the authority r.�ust annually pay to t!:e sc~ool district an a^ount of i.crerent eeLal to t}e i^cre�e.^.t t}:�t is attributable to t':e i�crease in the tax c�pzcity rate un�er the referencL�a. ,� � e-�•.ee (1) dces aot tDD�y♦ Lpo� z?Proval (2Z If c1aL_e f.'1- r_= by a,;:ajority vote of the gcvezni�g body of the r�unicipality and t}:e sc!:ool bcard, t}:e zut?'�ority .-•�ust pay to the scheol district a� �-:e::at of i;:cr'e:rer.t ecual to t}:e incre:r�ent that is attributable to the ir,czease i� t!:e tax capacity rate L*.�er t':e refe:e-cu�• (c The ar.,ounts of these ir.crements may be expended and must be treated by the school district in the same ma�ner as prcvided for tre revenues derived fro:n the referendum levy approved by the voters. The provisions of this subdivision apply to projects for vhich certification Was requested before, o�, ar.d after :,LC�st 1, 19i9. AGREEMENT This Agreement is dated as of , 1990, is by and between the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent School District No. 13, and provides as follows: 1. Definitions. As used in this Aqreement, the following terms have the following meanings, respectively: "City" means the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "�R ,P," means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota. �groiect" means Redevelopment Project No. 1 established and operated by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "�,985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's $4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1985, dated May 1, 1985. "j��mited Revenue Note" means the HRA's $5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated December 20, 1985. "�,985 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated December 30, 1985. "=986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $10,045,000 General Obliqation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of August 1, 1986. ��990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $9,485,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990. "�,ax Increment ObliQations" means the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 3095 2yH 211 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual obliqations of the HRA or the City which were entered into prior to the date of this Agreement and which commit the use of any tax increments from the TIF Districts for specified purposes, projects, or parties. «�ax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179. N i r'cts" means Tax . Increment Financing District Nos. 1 through 10 within the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains certification dates and other information on the TIF Districts. "SchoolDistrict"means Independent School District No. 13, the Columbia Heights School District. ",�ubdivision" means Minnesota Statutes Second 1989 Supplement, Section 469.177, Subdivision 10, as amended by Laws of Minnesota 1990, Chapter 604, Article 7, Section 24 (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B) . 2. Recitals. (a) In certain cases, the Subdivision either requires or allows by agreement certain tax increments attributable to school district referendum tax levies to be paid to school districts. (b� TIF District No. 6 is located entirely within the boundaries of the School District, and a portion of TIF District Nos. 2 and 4 are located within the boundaries of the School District. (c) None of the property within TIF District Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 is located within the boundaries of the School District. 3095 2 21J (d) It is ti to provide for increments to the and in accordance Subdivision. e purpose of this Agreement payment of certain tax School District pursuant to with the provision of the (e) Nothing in this Agreement is intended to violate the covenants and agreements heretofore made respecting the application of tax increments from the TIF Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment Obligations. 3. Representations of the C�tv. (a) The Tax Increment Obligations were issued to finance various activities of the HRA within the Project. (b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the HR.A. Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1 through 5 are pledged to the payment of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other sources of funds pledged to the payment thereof. The final scheduled principal maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February 1, 1999. (c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a general obligation of the City or the HRA and is payable solely from tax increments pledged for such purposes from TIF District No. 6. (d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable fr�m tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds was February 1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying all then outstanding principal thereof and interest thereon. (e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000. However, the City has advance refunded the 1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to said 3095 3 so9s refunding that all of the principal of and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have been paid on or before February 1, 1994. (f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is August l, 2009. (g) Portions of the principal of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds, and the 1990 G.O. Bonds were outstanding on May 1, 1988, and/or are outstanding on the date of this Agreement. 4. #tPvresentations of the School District. (a) On October 5, 1981, the electorate of the School District approved a 5.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1981 payable 1982 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1981 Levy". (b) On September 23, 1986, the electorate of the School District approved a 7.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1986 payable 1987 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1986 Levy". (c) According to the Minnesota Department of Education, for purposes of the above- mentioned referendum levies the tax capacity rate equivalents of 5 mills and 7 mills are .06162496 and .07875910, respectively. 5. gavment of Tax Increments to School District. The City and the School District hereby agree that, except as otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the tax increments relating to the 1989 payable 1990 property taxes, as follows: (a) TIF District No. 6. Since the 1981 Levy was approved before the date of certification of TIF District No. 6, the Subdivision does not apply to that Levy with � 21K respect to this District, and no tax increments attributable to said Levy from this District are payable to the School District. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 6 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy shall be paid to the School District. (b) �IF District No. 4. Since the 1981 Levy was approved prior to the date of certification of TIF District No. 4, the Subdivision does not apply to that Levy with respect to this District. Pursuant to clause b(2 ) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 4 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy shall be paid to the School District. (c) �IF District No. 2. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 2 which is attributable to the 1981 Levy and the 1986 Levy shall be paid to the School District. 6. Fu ther A reements. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the extent but only to the extent that the application of the ' terms of this Agreement would give rise to a violation of said � obligations and covenants, including without limitation, the default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or obligations. Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the City or the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts. 3095 In addition, the City and the School District agree that the provisions of paragraph 5 providing for payment of tax increment to the School District shall be limited to and shall apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1989 payable 1990 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion of said period, the City and the School District agree to review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good faith such further agreement or agreements as may be permitted by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School District with respect to discretionary payments of such applicable tax increment to the School District. 5 21L IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. 3o9s CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 13 School Board Chair Superintendent 6 2�M EXHIBIT A Schedule of Tax Increment Financinq Districts Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA TIF District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Name Center City Moore Lake North Area Johnson Printing/ Skywood Mall Paschke Lake Pointe Winf ield Shorewood Onan/Old Central Northco Phase III 3095 7 Certification Date 5/11/79 7/31/81 5/19/82 1/20/84 3/15/84 12/24/85 10/22/86 10/24/86 9/7/89 4/10/90 Ir�dependent School District No. 14 13/14 11/16 13/14 16 13 16 14 16 16 21N EXHIBIT B Sec. 2C. tii;.r.eseta Stnt��tes Secc-d 1So9 S-rgle�.er.t. 5ect:c� <6�.177, s::bdivisio� 10, -s e-e ^ced to read: 5_bd. !'J. (?A`."'.=\i ^O SC-OC�L :OR �:r=�:'��:'S L=V-''• � (a i.`.e prc�i�'_c-s ef this sLbcivis:ez ap�?y to tax i:.c:e-.e �t f?^��•cir.g dis:ricts ar.d pro�ects fer �:h?c'� cer:ifi�at'-�� s rec_ested te_°c:e !!ay 2, 15E6, tl:at are leca:ed i� a school cistr:ct -� �hich c'.:e �•otezs l:ave ap�reved rey tax capacity rates er a� 1T.CIEe52 �:1 t2X CE�2Cltj� l2.�5 LftEI t1:2 �LX l7CIE5.Ef.t f]':�^C1.':9 bistr?ct Las certified� (b1 (1) If there are no outsta�di::g bcacs cz kay 1. 19E8, to -`�ici i;.cre: ent frc� the district is plecced, or {:} if t*e refe:e;.cL� is apprcved after Kay l,' 19E8, a-d there aze :.o bo::cs cutsiar:di-g at tl:e ti.-.:e the refere.*.c�:� is ap�roved, t`at �eze u 98 e:-�3j-�c_�L�-:e=eee-e�...-_-e:ea:='9 iss�ed be:cte ay 1, 19 . - t=e-:az-ce=ec:�Y-ea:e-wa�-ep::ered-e_'te:-':1e--cs�-:ece��-====e :e:e-.er=-�re.:.-:?:e-d=nt::c�-:a-�-eeeed:--=c e?--e-ds-to-w=�eh-_. . - _{?�-•-�==e• the authority r�ust a.^.nLally pay to C:..:!e-{:�-Ct rr- -� t`e sc';ool 3istrict a� a^ou�t of ir.crerent eeLal to t}e i�cre�e.^.t t;:at is attributable to t.*.e increase in the tax c�pacity ra:e unCer the zeferendun. . , � e..�' _�� ( l) dces r�ot LDD1Yi Lpo� 2PPrcval (2L if claLSe f..i- r_= by a�ajority vote of the gcv�zni�g body of the r�unicipality ard tl:e sc!:ool bcard, t2:e authority .;�ust Fay to the scheol district a� a;�eLnt of i*cie:nent equal to t}:e ir.cre:r,ent that is attributable to the inczease in tl:e tax capacity rate nnZer t}e refere-cu:a. (� The amounts of these ir.crements may be expended and must be treated by the school district in the same ma�ner as proviCed for tre revenues derived fro:n the refererCLm levy approved by the voters. The provisions of this subdivision apply to projects for uhich certification Was requested before, on, ar.d after ALy�,;st 1, 19i9. � 210 This Agreement is by and between the Cit School District No. 14, 1618 AGREF�lENT dated as of , 1990, is y of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent and provides as follows: 1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings, respectively: "Citv" means the City of Fridley, Minnesota. " I�RA" means the Housinq and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "Proiect" means Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 established and operated by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "i985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's $4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1985, dated May 1, 1985. pLimited ltevenue Note means the HRA's $5,603,755.80 Limited ,Revenue Capital Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated December 20, 1985. "�985 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated December 30, 1985. "1986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of August 1, 1986. "i990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $9,485,000 General Obliqation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990. "Tax Increment Obliaations" means the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 21P G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual obliqations of the HI2A or the City which were entered into prior to the date of this Agreement and which commit the use of any tax increments from the TIF Districts for specified purposes, projects, or parties. "Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179. "TIF Districts" means Tax Increment Financing District Nos. 1 through 10 within the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains certification dates and other information on the TIF Districts. "�choolDistrict"means Independent School District No. 14, the Fridley School District. "Subdivision" means Minnesota Statutes Second 1989 Supplement, Section 469.177, Subdivision 10, as amended by Laws of Minnesota 1990, Chapter 604, Article 7, Section 24 (a copy of which is� attached hereto as Exhibit B) . 2. Recitals. (a) In certain cases, the Subdivision either requires or allows by aqreement certain tax increments attributable to school district referendum tax levies to be paid to school districts. (b) TIF District Nos. 1 and 8 are located entirely within the boundaries of the School District, and a portion of TIF District Nos. 2 and 4 are located within the boundaries of the School District. (c) None of the property within TIF District Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 is located within the boundaries of the School District. (d) It is the purpose of this Agreement to provide for payment of certain tax 1618 2 21Q increments to the School District pursuant to and in accordance with the provision of the Subdivision. (e) Nothing in this Agreement is intended to violate the covenants and agreements heretofore made respecting the application of tax increments from the TIF Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment Obligations. 3. Representations of the Citv. (a) The Tax Increment Obligations were issued to finance various activities of the HRA within the Project. (b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the HRA. Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1 through 5 are pledged to the payment of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other sources of funds pledged to the payment thereof. The final scheduled principal maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February 1, 1999. (c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a general obligation of the City or the HRA and is payable solely from tax increments pledged for such purposes from TIF District No. 6. (d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds was February 1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying all then outstanding principal thereof and interest thereon. (e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000. However, the City has advance refunded the 1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to said refunding that all of the principal of and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have been paid on or before February 1, 1994. 7618 3 21R 1618 (f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1, 2009. (g) Portions of the principal of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds, and the 1990 G.O. Bonds were outstanding on May l, 1988, and/or are outstanding on the date of this Agreement. 4. Representations of the School District. (a) On September 23, 1986, the electorate of the School District approved a 2.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1986 payable 1987 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1986 Levy". (b) On September 29, 1987, the electorate of the School District approved (i) a 7.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1987 payable 1988 property taxes and (ii) a continuous additional 6.5 mill levy first effective for the 1988 payable 1989 property taxes. These levies are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "1987 Levies". (c) According to the Minnesota Department of Education, for purposes of the above- mentioned referendum levies the tax capacity rate equivalents of 2 mills and 13.5 mills are .02261395 and .15264411, respectively. 5. ments to School District. The City and the School District hereby agree that, except as otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the tax increments relating to the 1989 payable 1990 property taxes, as follows: (a) TIF District No. 8. Since the 1987 Levies were approved after the date of certification of TIF District No. 8, and since on May 1, 1988, there were no bonds outstanding to which increment from TIF District No. 8 was 4 21S 1618 pledged, the tax increments from TIF District No. 8 which are attributable to the 1987 Levies are automatically payable and shall be paid to the School District pursuant to clause b(1) of the Subdivision. Since the 1986 Levy was approved prior to the date of certification of TIF District No. 8, the Subdivision does not apply to that Levy with respect to this District, and no tax increments attributable to said Levy from this District are payable to the School District. (b) �IF D'strict No.__4. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 4 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 198? Levies shall be paid to the School District. (c) TIF District No. 2. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 2 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 1987 Levies shall be paid to the School District. (d) �IF District No� 1. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 1 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 1987 Levies shall be paid to the School District. 6. Further A�reements. Nothing in this Agreement is intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the extent but only to the extent that the application of the terms of this Agreement wotild give rise to a violation of said obligations and covenants, including without limitation, the default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or obligations. Nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the City or the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts. In addition, the City and the School District agree that, except in each case described in paragraph 5 of this Agreement where payment of tax increment to the School District is mandatory pursuant to clause b(1) of the Subdivision, all �� 21T 21U other provisions of said paragraph 5 providing for payment of tax increment to the School District shall be limited to and shall apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1989 payable 1990 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion of said period, the City and the School District agree to review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good faith such further agreement or agreements as may be permitted by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School District with respect to discretionary payments of such applicable tax increment to the School District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14 School Board Chair Superintendent 16ta 6 EXHIBIT A Schedule of Tax Increment Financing Districts Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA TIF District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1618 ame Center City Moore Lake North Area Johnson Printing/ Skywood Mall Paschke Lake Pointe Winfield Shorewood Onan/Old Central Northco Phase III r7 Certification Date 5/11/79 7/31/81 5/19/82 1/20/84 3/15/84 12/24/85 10/22/86 10/24/86 9/7/89 4/10/90 Independent School District No. 14 13/14 11/16 13/14 16 13 16 14 16 16 21V EXHIBIT B Sec. 24. Mir.r.escta Stat�tes Secc-d 1859 5_pg?e'•e�t, sect'_c� <E�.177. s;:bdivisio� 10, :s a-.e ^ced :o rezd: S::bd . 20. ( r AYK=`� i^O SC: OC�L FOR �EF=�-?.'�vM L=ti �, J ( a ?.`.e �rcvis°_c-s ef this sLbdivisic� �p�?y to t�x i�c:e-.ert f?.^.a;.ci::g d?s:r:cts ar.d pro�ects fer �:hic'� ceztificat'_c� �as zee::ested tefc:e !!ay 1, 1SE8, trat are lecated ?� a sc.*.00l distr:ct i� �:hic� t.`.e �oters have appzoved r,eW tax capacity zates cr a� ir.crease in tax capacity za:es after tl:e tax inczes.er.t fir.a^ci�g distr?ct ��s certified. (b) il) If there are no oLtsta::ding bo�cs on kay �. 19E8, to �5?ci i;.cre-.ent frc� the district is plecced, or {?� if the refe:e-cL� is apprcved afte�r Hay 1,' 1SE6, a::d there are r.o bo*�s cutstz;:di;.g at tre ti �e the refere.*.cn� is ap�roved, t`�t weze iss;:ed be`cre !!ay 1, 1988, �e-{3j-ir_•.La_:e=eee-e�.:.-�'c:ee�:r.9 t=e-:�X-e` ac:tY-eGte-wa�-tp�rCred-e'_•.e:-aye-rCet-reeer..-==�=° ,. p CF-�G.'.CO-:O-xti�G:l��f:Ct��.t� �-��CS-�le-Gt�t_ tC�-t�-=.Z�CGt�:�-SL cian:e-{:�-er-{?�-arps=ee; the authority rust annually paY to t`e sc�ool district an a�ount of ir.crerent eqLal to t*e i�czer,:e.^.t that is attributable to t.*,e increase in the tax capacity rate unCer the referencLn. (2� If clause t?j-LF�==e� (1) does nct LDDlyr upoa approval by a,��ajority vote of the ycverning body of the r,�unicipality a�d tre sc�ool bcard, the aut?;ority rust pay to the scheol district an �:.-,o;:�t of ir•cr'ement egual to t}:e incre:r,ent that is attri�utable to the inczease in tl:e tax capacity rate Ln�er t.*.e referer.du�. (c The amounts of these ir.crements may be expended and must be treated by the school district in the same manner as pzovided for the revenues derived from the zeferer.dum levy approved by the voters. The provisions of this subdivision apply to projects for vhich certification Was requested before, on, ard after ALg�st i, 19i9. � 21W This Aqreement is by and between the Cit Sc�ool District No. 16, AGREEMENT dated as of , 1990, is y of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent and provides as follows: 1. pefinitions. As used in this Aqreement, the following terms have the following meanings, respectively: "Cit.y" means the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "�RA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Fridley, Minnesota. "Project" means Redevelopment Project No. 1 established and operated by the HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "�985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's $4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1985, dated May 1, 1985. "j�mited Revenue Note" means the HRA's ' $5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital - Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated December 20, 1985. "�q85 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated December 30, 1985. "�986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refundinq Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of August 1, 1986. "�,990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's $9,485,000 General Obliqation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990. "Tax Increment Obliqations means the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the 1990 3097 21X 3097 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual obliqations of the HRA or the City which were entered into prior to the date of this Agreement and which commit the use of any tax increments from the TIF Districts for specified purposes, projects, or parties. "Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 throuqh 469.179. NTTF Districts" means Tax Increment Financing District Nos. 1 throuqh 10 within the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains certification dates and other information on the TIF Districts. "SchoolDist�iG�" means Independent School District No. 16, the Spring Lake Park School District. "Subdivision" means Minnesota Statutes Second 1989 Supplement, Section 469.177, Subdivision 10, as amended by Laws of Minnesota 1990, Chapter 604, Article 7, Section 24 (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B) . 2. Recitals. (a) In certain cases, the Subdivision either requires or allows by aqreement certain tax increments attributable to school district referendum tax levies to be paid to school districts. (b) TIF District Nos. 5, 7, 9, and 10 are located entirely within the boundaries of the School District, and a portion of TIF District No. 3 is located within the boundaries of the School District. (c) None of the property within TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 is located within the boundaries of the School District. (d) It is the purpose of this Agreement to pro�ide for payment of c�rtain tax 2 21Y 21Z increments to the School District pursuant to and in accordance with the provision of the Subdivision. (e) Nothing in this Aqreement is intended to violate the covenants and agreements heretofore made respecting the application of tax increments from the TIF Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment Obliqations. 3. t�epresentations of the Citv. (a) The Tax Increment Obligations were issued to finance various activities of the HRA within the Project. (b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not general obligations of the City or the HRA. Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1 through 5 are pledged to the payment of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other sources of funds pledged to the payment thereof. The final scheduled principal maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February 1, 1999. (c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a qeneral obligation of the City or the HRA and is payable solely from tax increments pledged for such purposes from TIF District No. 6. (d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds was February 1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying all then outstanding principal thereof and interest thereon. (e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000. However, the City has advance refunded the 1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990 G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to said -refunding that all of the principa� of and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have been paid on or before February 1, 1994. 3097 3 21AA (f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from tax increments derived from TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1, 2009. (g) Portions of the principal of the 1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note, the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds, and the 1990 G.O. Bonds were outstanding on May 1, 1988, and/or are outstanding on the date of this Agreement. 4. Regresentations of the School District. (a) On October 8, 1981, the electorate of the School District approved a 5.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1981 payable 1982 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1981 Levy". (b) On February 27, 1986, the electorate of the School District approved a 6.0 mill continuous levy first effective for the 1986 payable 1987 property taxes. This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1986 Levy". (c) According to the Minnesota Department of Education, for purposes of the above- mentioned referendum levies the tax capacity rate equivalents of 5 mills and 6 mills are .05226653 and .06271984, respectively. 5. Payment of Tax Increments to School District. The City and the School District hereby agree that, except as otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the tax increments relating to the 1989 payable 1990 property taxes, as follows: (a) TIF District Nos. 9 and 10. Since TIF District Nos. 9 and 10 were requested for certification after May l, 1988, the Subdivision does not apply to those Districts, and no tax increments attributable to the 1981 Levy or the 1986 Levy from those Districts are payable to the School District. 3097 4 3097 (b) TTF District No. 7. Since the 1981 Levy and the 1986 Levy were approved prior to the date of certification of TIF District No. 7, the Subdivision does not apply to those Levies with respect to this District, and no tax increments attributable to said Levies from this District are payable to the School District. (c) TTF District No. 5. Since the 1981 Levy was approved prior to the date of cert- ification of TIF District No. 5, the Subdi- vision does not apply to the 1981 Levy, and no tax increments attributable to said Levy from this District are payable to the School District. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 5 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy shall be paid to the School District. (d) TIF District No._3. Since the 1981 Levy was approved prior to the date of certification of TIF District No. 3, the Subdivision does not apply to the 1981 Levy, and no tax increments attributable to said Levy from this District are payable to the School District. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF District No. 3 which is attributable to the 1986 Levy shall be paid to the School District. 6. Further P�creements. Nothing in this�Agreement is intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the extent but only to the extent that the application of the terms of this Agreement would give rise to a violation of said obligations and covenants, includinq without limitation, the default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to avoid such default or ather violation of said covenants or obligations. Nothinq in this Agreement shall restrict the City or the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts. 5 - - 21CC In addition, the City and the School District agree that the provisions of paragraph 5 providing for payment of tax increment to the School District shall be limited to and shall apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1989 payable 1990 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion of said period, the City and the School District agree to review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good faith such further agreement or agreements as may be permitted by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School District with respect to discretionary payments of such applicable tax increment to the School District. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA Mayor City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16 School Board Chair Superintendent 3097 6 EXHIBIT A Schedule of Tax Increment Financing Districts Within Housing and Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA TIF District 1 2 3 3097 4 �� 6 7 8 9 10 ame Center City Moore Lake North Area Johnson Printing/ Skywood Mall Paschke Lake Pointe Winfield Shorewood Onan/Old Central Northco Phase III Certification Date 5/11/79 7/31/81 5/19/82 1/20/84 3/15/84 12/24/85 10/22/86 10/24/86 9/7/89 4/10/90 21DD Inciependent School District No. 14 13/ 14 11/16 13/14 16 13 16 14 16 16 , 21EE EXHIBIT B Sec. 24. Mir.r.escta Stztutes Secc-d 1�09 5_Yg1e'•e't� sect'_c� <63.177, s�bdivisio� 10, is ar..e,ced :o read: S-bd. 1J. (?AY!'.�tii :O SC:OOL :C� �=--�-'��•H L=Yt j(a i.`.e prc�is:cr.s cf this sLbcivisicz n.�ly to tax _-c:e-•e: t fi^a'cir.g G=S:I:CLS E.'.d pro�ects �CI ti::1:C'•1 �Er�=a=C2t-C:l 4a5 ZEC::EStEa , he_°c:e `!�y 1, 15E8, trat aze lccated in a sc}ool ciis:r"_ct =� +:hicn t::e totezs have ap�rcced :�eW tax capacity rates er a� " ir.crease :n tax capacity rates after t}:e tax i::cres.er.t fir.ar.ci-g distr:ct �:as certified. (b1 (1) If there are. no outsta::dir.g bo:�cs c� kay 1, 19E8, to �`�ic� i-cre�ent frc:a t':e cistrict is plecSed, or {:} if the refe:e;.cL:a is ap�rcved after Kay 1,' 15E8, a^d there aze r.o bo^�s CL`�S�Ei:dir.g at tre ti.�e the f2f2IETGL'Z is ap?rcved, tLat �:ere -{ -�-�ie-:e_'ece-e�-.-_'c:ea:='9 issLed be_`cre '!ay 1, 1988, c: �i'- t�e-:tz-ct=ec::Y-ct:C-1fL�-LL:'ered-tf�es-tie--.os:-ttce-�-=--=e o'-=e-do-:o-x�ieh-_r.e:e-e::�-�:e--��e-c=str=et--e-:_eeeed:---� ecae:e-{_j-o=-f�/�tYY==Q-� t':e authority r.,ust a^r.ually pay to the sc`ool district az a^ou�t of i::cre:�ent eeual to t}e increr,;e^t that is attributable to t}e increase in the tax capacity rate un�er the referencLn. . � �-'�� (1) dces nct LDDly� Lpo� approval (2Z if claLSe {��-ep_:� by a najority vote of the gcv�erning body of the r�unicipality aad tre school bcard, the authority ...ust Fay to the scheol distzict an a:.,oLat of ircr'e:r�er.t eceal to t}:e ir.cre:r�e�t t1:at is attiibutab]e to the ircrease in t}:e tzx capacity rate Lr�cer t.`.e refere-dua. � The ar.,ounts of these ir.crements may be expended and must be treated by the school district in the same manner as provi�ed for the revenues derived from the zeferer.�L^� levy approved by the voters. The provisions of this subdivision Epply to projects for Which certification Was requested before, o�, ar.d after ALgvst •1, 19i9. � Z Q � W Q � J ` � � Z W Q w � w � � U Q � � J O 2 U N � W Qc c � W � � r � � � Q H C m 7 � � c E � � � �� m � m �� a� � � �� ^ v � ea � � c � i� ,,, ro m � � V � �U �> « � 0 � � v C � � � � m Q 0 N � m � � tl7 O t0 tn � �D N � CO N �A d O O `� � � c� v m ti r � � � r �o �g �:� �� c� n m r� � c°Dp � c°�o 0 0 r T m � m 0 m m m m a < « Z Z Z z c� co � a � J � � � `° � N 8 O � � � J � �o W O � 21FF � � CD � � N O S N N O l�'! t�0 � fV G C (V Oi N u'i �O � � � O Q�i N N r- ac ri Fi � r T �i 8�rnrn �zz �� r�i � c°� � � �D to tc ao cc tD �or� r°ac^o Nco N � U V 44°0 <� W W Y �/i � Y � � C �p � C J� O J p 0 m y a m� m L m p Y O � � J � � J N � �O N d �D s s ac ak aF aa .-. .. v v aa 1 � Z Z � J M = �k � si �' � � � 0 m = O � � J � � m N Of � Z � _ � � � J � � 0 Z W Q LL W Q H U Q N 0 J � _ U � � W a � � W O � � � �, �� , � � � � C E < � � � � � m �U� ¢ � � � � e��o � C � � m � � V � �U �> Y � c � � � � � E � � m Q �C � � � � _ � �,�<ms � �� o � O�i Q�i N n � E�0 iC CO G�G �C V tD N IA Of �� C'7 �� N p � r � P � C7 � N Q> � N � � � � � � � Q c� co c� co � tV N N N Z ��N CD N fD et N !7 N Q> h �t � r- � � � o> m v <Qa�� !' �' Y (/i U U J c � O m m H m g c � c UU�-°�t=/) ��avao s � � � � � � v� Q 1 Z J � � J � � �C N � � N � � � � � � e c� c�'� c� c� c� �ci �ri vi �ri �ri � � � � � �� N m N Of � a � N � � � � m m � d aaa��. i� T � � � U U J c m m m N m g c � 0 UC�� V� ��av ao ak ae aR ak ac v � � � oi � � � � � � �, � � 0 � � � t0 � � � � � 21GG �,��sso o;�000 � CD � th C'7 � l7 � 0 0 � tC tC Z Z Z `8�e,�"�° � a a � N O CO tn d' M N � � �- 1A N � Y Y R = U � � A m C � V � a � Q Y � O �°, L m r r �'�i `c �`e r Z 2 d� O Z � M � � rn � aR : aR aR aR : � .. .�. .-. � v v v Q � Z � J � � � co � � � N �a � � z ¢ � � Q � J � O Z W Q W LL W 2 � V Q H � G J 8 U � 0 W Q � N W 0 01 � � � m �� V � � � O � g � � � E < � � �� U � � �¢ H � z �. �� c � � m ffi �U � ��> H � � �' � � � � EI � � � � � � a � � � � � N e0 H � � � 0 0 10 E O C O a � � � N m � > � � � U � � 7 NG U i• � c c o l0 :.� m � � Y m � � v � � E O e0 � C H 7 m ia ¢ � eva � U � o e� � o � �w o o E � h A 3 � � « m � Q $ � � r a H � � � � c C m � E � v C m m m � 0 A 3 � � cc � � m � v m � � m � O O a � � a eo � � � m t � T °a � o � C � o � � N V � ; m � m� m N Q � m m � ~ v ° � H � eo v 0 c �a N � a i� � v g �r 5', � m � � r � m � � h �` O no �' c U � � fy A ,� O � 7 y � v � m U N U N 0 � H 0 �. a A O c � 0 0 H > � h � � � a °D m °� � � io �„ N R m � eo m � � 10 v 21HH �IIEMORANDUM � c�tr .t f.i��•r _ •1i 1 Y�I��t�lt� •��• N.E. sr1�1.�. 111�A.•.t• ssa�: ►Me�• (�1lI��1��4i0 22 Mfiriam C. Hunt Asaistant to ths City Mans�er �� MEMO TO: IIILLIAM 11. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER � FROM: 11ILLIAM C. HQIdT, !►SSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER �� DAT$: BIIBJECT: JONE 29� 1990 1990-91 CONTRACT 11ITH THE TWIN CITY AREA IIRBAN CORPS Each year the City of Fridley enters into a contract with the City of Minneapolis to participate in the Urban Corps Program. As a participant the City can employ students who have Federal Work Study Grants to work as interns. The City pays between thirty and forty percent of the salary, and Federal Work Study money makes up the difference. For exam le, an u uate student from the University of Minnesot eceive $5.75 er hour for intern work and the City will pay $2.59 o the rb Corps. The Urban Corps also takes care of an � and insurance for the interns. In order to participate in the Urban Corps program, it is necessary for the City of Fridley to contract with the City of Minneapolis. The required contract is attached. I request that you present this matter to the Fridley City Council at their meeting on July 9, 1989 for a motion authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign the attached contract with the City of Minneapolis. WCH/jb 1990 - 1991 AGR�CM�NT POR PAItTICIPATION IN URIlAN CORPS PROGIiAbt BCTW��N CITY OF MINN�AFOLIS AND T11IS AGR�CM�NT is entered into this day of 19 , by and between the City of Minneapolis (herein called "llrban Corps"j and (herei� called "Agency"). W1ICRCA�, the above na�ed Agency, a public organization or private non-profit tax-exeept organization, desires to participate in the Twin City Area Urban Corps and in consideration for the assign�ent of Urban Corps student interns to the Agency, we do hereby agree to the follo�ving ter�s and conditions: 1. The Urban Corps shall have the right to approve or reject requests for interns sub�itted by this Agency upon for�s provided for that purpose by the Urban Corps. 2. The Agency will accept a student as an intern by co�pleting and signing the Assign�ent section of the student's Urban Corps application foro. 3. The Agency shall utilize such students as ■ay be assigned to it in ac- cordance with the specifications. set forth in its written request to the Urban Corps, and shall iQmediately notify the Urban Corps of any change in nature of assign�ent, duties, supervisor or worl: location. 4. The Agency shall provide such students as ■ay be assigned to it with a safe place to work and with responsible supervision. 5. The Urban Corps shall have the right to inspect the work being performed by such students as ■ay be assigned to the Agency, and shall have the right to interview such students and their supervisors. 6. The Urban Corps shall have the right to require such students as aay be assigned to the Agency to attend such �eneral or special ■eetings, or to appear at the Urban Corps office, individually or as a group, as shall be.necessary Por the proper functions of the prograa�. 7. In accordance irith the require�ents of Federal and State law, work perforped by such students as ■ay be assigned to the Agency shall: a. b. Be in-t�e--pub2ic interest; Ntit result in the displacenent of enployed workers or iapair existing contracts for services; 22A c. Not involve the construction, operation or aaintenance of so ■uch of any facility as is used, or is to be used. for sectarian instruction or as a place of religious worship; d. Not involve any partisan or nonpartisan political activity or be for the Office of Cducation. 16. At the election of the Agency. the Urban Corps shall place interns for whom Lhe Agency will pay the intern's total co�pensation plus an edditional fifteen percent (15%) for adainistrative costs. This option Mill be speciPied in the Assign�ent Por• which the intern's Agency supervisor aust sign before couence�ent of the internship. Agency rates for said option are set forth in Section 16(a) and 16(b) of this Agreenent. a. Agency rates for students Mill be set at ■iniaun rates of 56.61 per hour for.entering fresh�en through receipt of a Dachelor's Degree, and 57.76 per hour for graduate students; other agreed upon hourly compensation rates not to be below specified rates in 16(a); or other rates for Urban Corps student interns as established by the City of Minneapolis through a salary ordinance replacing current �nini�aum rates. b. A Yraduate student is defined for purposes of this Agreeoent as one who has received a B.A., D.S., or equivalent degree or is enrolled in the fifth year of a five year program. 17. Ferforaance under this contract shall con�ence on July 1, 1990 and ter�inate on June �0, 1991 unless anended in writing as ■utually agreed upon by both the Agency and the Urban Corps; however, either party oay terwinate upon sirty (60) days written notice. Dased upon the state�ents and affir�ations ■ade by the Agency through the above docunent, the Urban Corps,hereby agrees to the assignpent of students to said Agency, in accordance with said document and the applicable laws and regulations. CITY OI� MINNGAFOLIS ay Mayor ATTCST: City Clerk COUNTGRSIGNCD: City Pinance Officer Approved as to Legality: Minneapolis Assistant City Attorney AGGNCY Agency Name Address City State Zip Code By Title By Title ATT�ST: 22C 23 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LZC8NSL8 24 Julv 9, 1990 �.pe of License: B� CIGARETTE Bill Johnson Amoco Willis Johnson 53t1 University Ave. N.E. Fridl.ey, Mn. 55432 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Central Oriental Foods Won Jin Choih 6440 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Mn. 55432 Target Dist. Center Twin City Vending Co. 7120 Central Ave. N,E. Fridley,Mn. 55432 LIVESTOCK (Rabbits) Tai PJguyen Same 626 Bennett Dr. Fridley, Mn. 55432 RETAIL GASOLINE Bill Johnson Amoco Willis Johnson 5311 University Ave. P�,E. Fridley,Mn. 55432 SOLICITOR (Charitable) Mn.A C 0 R N (Assoc. of Community Organizations for Reform Now) 757 Raymond Ave. (Douglas J. Mirk) St.Paul,Mn. 55114 �aroved By: James P. Hill Public Safety Director � $12.00 $45.00 $45.00 $10.00 $60.00 James P. Hill Asking Fees to be waived � � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL BLECTRICAL Blaine Heating, A/C & Electric Inc. 13562 Central Avenue N.E. Anoka, MN 55304 Ken Chouinard Southtown Service Electric 4909 Islandview Drive Mound, MN 55364 Ed Freidlund, GAS SERVICES Blaine Heating, A/C & Electric Inc. 13562 Central Avenue N.E. Anoka, MN 55304 Ken Chouinard Midwestern Mechanical 9103 Davenport Street N.E. Blaine, Mn 55434 James Harvey Pfiffner Heating & Air Conditioning 6301 Welcome Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55429 � Penny Kane Riccar Heating & Air Cond. 2387 - 136th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Addition & Remodeling Spec., 10800 Xavis Street N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Arbuckle Construction 7808 West 99th Street Bloomington, MN 55438 Mark Riccar Inc. Roger Harju James Arbuckle Day's Construction & Remodeling 3242 Sandeen Road Arden Hills, NIl�1 55112 Jim Day Durabilt Garages 7343 Ann Court Eden Prairie, MN 55436 Tom Kasprzak Sr. M. Fitzgerald Construction Inc. 265Q - 137th Lane N.E. Ham Lake, NIIJ 55304 Mark Fitzgerald LICENSES STATE OF MINN Same CLYDE WILEY Bldg/Mech Insp. Same Same Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same Same . . Martinson Builders 8131 - 6th Street N.E. Minneapolis, I�T 55432 Rejman's Home Improvements 637 - 109th Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids, Mn 55433 Swan Decorating Inc. 645 - 9th Avenue N.W. New Brighton, MN 55112 Luther Martinson Ed Rejman Paul Torkildson Wayne, David Construction Inc. 7363 Washington Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 David James Wescott Construction & Development Inc. 85 East County Road B Little Canada, l�T 55117 Scott Wesch SEATING Blaine Heating, A/C & Electric Inc. 13562 Central Avenue N.E. Anoka, MN 55304 Ken Chouinard Collova HVAC 3064 Labore Road Little Canada, NIN 55109 Carmelo Collova Cronstrom's Heating & Air Cond. Inc. 4410 Excelsior Blvd. St. Louis Park, 1�T 55416 Peter Rice Master Mechanical Inc. 9864 James Circle Bloomington, MN 55431 Midwestern Mechanical 9103 Davenport Street N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 Gordon Peters James Harvey Pfiffner Heating & Air Conditioning 6301 Welcome Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55429 Penny Kane Preferred Mechanical Services Inc. 712 West 77 1/2 Street Richfield, MN 55423 Wayne Johnson Riccar Heating & Air Cond. 2387 - 136th Avenue N.W. Andover, MN 55304 Mark Riccar Same Same Same Same Same CLYDE WILEY Bldg/Mech Insp. Same Same Same Same Same Same Same . � PLIIMBING Allied Plumbing Inc. 249 - 96th Lane N.E. Blaine, l�t 55434 David Jones Capitol Utilities 4120 Isle Avenue North Lake Elmo, 1�1 55042 Ernie Capra Custom Plumbing Inc. 12711 Hilloway Road Minnetonka, NIId 55343 Ted Linden Londer, Bill Plumbing Co., Inc. 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Golden Valley, MN 55426 Bill Londer ROOFING Nu-Look Remodelers 1 - 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, IrIN 55454 Wayne Young SIGN ERECTOR Universal Sign Company 1033 Thomas Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 Lee Palmateer SWIMMING FOOL Northwest Racquet & Swim Club 24C STATE OF MINN Same Same Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl. Same 5525 Cedar Lake Road DARREL CLARK St. Louis Pk, MN 1200 E Moore Lk Dr Chief Bldg Ofcl. _ - • '•�� FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL July 9, 1990 LOCATION OF BUILDING Jasari Sc�utz 13560 Pbppy St. Andover', MN 55304 St.even May 2359 Pinewood Ciz�cle �s View, I�IlJ 55112 Tcaa Adants PO Box 915 S�rir�gfield, ZN 37172 Gary F�hillips 531 Mississippi St. F�idley, I�T 55432 Rr.�bert & EVe1yn Kisch 216-14th Ave. NW New Brighton, NIld 55112 Ashok C�1pta 760 Old Hwy. 8 New Bric�ton, N�T 55113 A1 & G]1x�ex Schiro 2630 F,a�trnan Dr. NE New ffiighton, NIN 55112 Dt�ne I�evar�dawsx.i 14801 Scenic Hgts. Rd. Eden Prairie, NIN 55344 Micilael Mezzenga 2917 Woodale Drive N1a�u�ds View, N�T 55112 Glen Peterson 2121 Univ. Ave. I� I�ls, 1�Ai 55418 William F'o4�Y 13205 Jenkins Mpls, MN 55434 7379-81 Able St. 7430 Able St. 430 Iro�lt�on St. 431 Mississippi St. 1601 N. IruLSbzucJc #142 1601 N. Innsbruck #249 1241-43 Norton Ave. 6361 Pieroe St. 5901 2-1/2 St. 380 57th Plaoe 349-53 57th Plaoe LIC8I�18E6 24� UNITS FEE 1 12.00 2 24.00 3 54.00 1 18.00 1 18.00 1 12.00 2 24.00 2 24.00 4 54.00 4 54.00 2 36.00 APPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREP,U/HOUSING INSPECTOR � � CfTYOF FRIDLEY FOR CONCIIRRENCg BY TH8 CITY COIINCIL JIILY 9, 1990 Herrick & Newman. 205 Fridley Plaza Office Bldg. 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, I�T 55432 EBTIMATES Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Month of June, 1990 . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,923.00 Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Bldg. 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, IrIIJ 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attorney for the Month of April, 1990 HNTB 6700 France Avenue South Suite 260 Minneapolis, 1�T 55435 . . . . . $ 8,837.00 Inspection of the 1.5 MG Elevated Water Reservoir Project No. 202 Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1, 204 .13 Karlen Construction 901 - 125th Avenue N.E. Blaine, l�i 55434 Flanery Park Shelter Project No. 206 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18, 698 . 00 25