The URL can be used to link to this page

11/19/1990 - 5138Ol'?ICI�L CITY COO�IL �OE1RD71 OOUIICZL 1tssTl�i �OYSitBER 1!, 1�40 � � -;� ,_�:,, < ,.� , �; � � �:; . 3� '; � � � Jy, � � FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING �a� ATTENDENCE SHEET Monday,- November 19, 1990 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRITT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ITEM NT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER v ,�f�'�.ti s � � /� � �. ' 9 �� . �� .�.ii ��/l!�, � �� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL -�N � �TOVSItB$it 19, 1990 :. . :� • _ �1+�=�-� City Council Meetinq of November 5, 1990 Special City Council Meeting of November 13, 1990 ADOiTION OF AaBNDA: OPB]f FORIIM. VIBITORB: (Consideration of items not on aqenda - 15 minutes) �IIB�IC BEARING: Ado�tion of the Budget for Fis :al Year 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 � \ lRiD: �EY CiTY COII�iCiL lLS=TIITG, ]tOV81t8EA 19, 1990 paq� 2 � �: � : ,L: : - Reso:.ution Adoptinq a Budqet for the Fisc+ �1 Year 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2B ResoLution Declarinq the Necessity to L:vy a Tax Which Appeare to be in Exce:s of 16 Mills, the Need for a Spec�al Levy, and Certifyinq Tax Levy RequLrements for 1991 to the County of Anok � for Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3B PIIBL [C HEARINGB: Esta�lishinq Solid Waste Abatement Prog ram Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4C Landscape Amendments to the Zoning Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5I FAZD LBY CITY COOliC=L lLEBTI�G, �OVF.1tB$R 19, 1940 p�Q• 3 . . i : ,� : : - �ppo intment to ths �ippeals Co�omission (Tab Led il/05/90) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 �A 3II8I�88: Firs: Readinq of an Ordinance Esta�lishing Solid Waste Abatement Prog �am Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7A Firs: Readinq of an Ordinance Recaiifyinq the Fridley City Code, Chap:er 205, Pertaininq to Landscapinq . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8U Firs: Reading of an Ordinance Recodifyinq the 'ridley City Code, Chapter 206 Enti�:led "Building Code," by Amendinq Sect.ons 206.01.02, 206.01.03, 206.01.04, 206.11.05, 206.03.02, and 206.05 . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9W litlDJ ►EY CI'1'Y OOII�iCIL 1LaSTI�Ni� xOVE1[SS�t if, 1990 paq� 4 � : � : � . _ � . , Y . l �� - � Rece.ve Ztems froa the Minutes of the ;►ppeals Commission Meetinq of Octo] >er 30, 1990 : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - lOQQ A. Variance Request, VAR #90-27, by Weldon Fenton, to Reduce the Side Yard Satback from 10 Feet to 6 Feet, to �llow the Enclosure of an Existinq Porch on Lot 2, Block 6, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 6, the Same Being 640 - 67th Avenue N.E. ........... 10 - lOJ B. Variance RequeSt, VAR #90-28, by Health One Unity Hospital, to Increase the Square Footaqe of an Area Identification Siqn from 24 Square Feet to 94 Square Feet, to Allow the Construction of a New Area Identification Siqn at 5�50 Osborne Road ........ lOK - lOEE C. Variance Request, VAR �90-29, by Dennis Garner, to Increase the Area an Unenclosed Deck can Extend into the Side Yard from 3 Feet to 8 Feet, to Allow the Construction of an Unenclosed Deck on Lot 6, Block 2, Hillcrest Addition, the Same Beinq 7119 Ashton Avenue N.E. .............. lOFF - lOQQ App:•oval of Metropolitan Council Res:.dential Recyclinq Bins Grant App:.ication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . il - liX l�AIDi.�7 CITY ODO�iCIL l[iiTZ�, �O�SA 19, 1l90 Baq� S � Nuis Driv Info Clai: Lice� Esti� �iDJ01 � ��, ; f'' �F T8E 1LIx0'1'=8 O! ?BS lRIDL�Y CI'tY t�ODI�CIL l�?i� � �OV�IfLEIt S, 19l0 �$$_ ILI�TTOTEB O�' '1'HE itEaIIL�1it l[EETI�iG Ol� TSE FRIDI,$Y CITY COIINCIL OF �V !�$R S, 1990 The �eqular Meetinq of the Fridley City Council wae called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Nee. ��3E OF ALLEGIANCE: Kaycr Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of �lleqiance to t he Flaq. � �OLI r MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMB 3RS ABSENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorqenson, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billinqs Councilman Schneider Coun:ilwoman Jorqenson stated that Councilman Schneider had unde:�qone surgery to open an artery and was in Abbott Northwestern Hosp �tal, Room 3478. She atated that he is expected to be home this week and, hopefully, back on the Council shortly. 'i • • •�� ;s�; �s � � : • ��t�r = ' � Mayo:� Nee read and issued a proclamation proclaiminq November 7, 1990 as Cathy Nelson Day in the City and ercouraged Fridley resi�lents to attend a reception in her honor on November 7 at the Frid:,ey High School. He stated that Cathy was named the 1990 Minn�:sota Teacher of the Year and, in 1988, also received the TOPS and 7eacher of Excellence Awards. He stated that the City is proud to h<.ve a teacher of her caliber in the community. ! � 1 i � Y fil �� yl ��•: � •� MOTICN by Councilman Billings to approve the minutes as presented. Secorded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �r ��s ;� • • � � MOTICN by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda as submitted. Secor.ded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. MOTIC N by Councilman Billinqs to amend the aqenda to include the folloaing: (17A) Discussion of Rules for Proceedings of the Council. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all v�tinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � �� 1 � . � � : � c • . • � :. Yi : : ; ' � e : UPON A VOICE VOTE T�N ON THE I�AIN KOTION, all voted aye, and I�ayor Nee declared the aotion carried unanimously. �•��` • � �ti �►� �. There �as no business. � _i�: � responee from the audience under this item of �'� _- � �- •� � �!� � •� t=� _ •� � � � ��_ + • .• �: � Mr. Hill, Public Safety Director, stated that this ordinance would specify qamblinq prohibitions in beer establishments which has previously been City policy or administrative interpretation. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 958 and adopt it on the second readinq and order publication. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. •�� _ � ;_ •� 4: �; � •� �:� �! . � �l! � � � . � • • - : � �� _ � • .� � � .� Mr. Hill, Public Safety Director, stated that this is basically a housekeepinq item to keep the City's ordinance current so that it is not in conflict with the State statute reqardinq qambiing prohibitions. He stated that it alao establishes the rent which increased from a maximum of $100 per week to $600 per month. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 959 and adopt it on the second readinq and order publication. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #9b-15 BY AL SCHRADER TO ALLOW REPAIR GARAGES; TO ALLOW AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS AND MOTOR VEHICL FUEL AND OIL DISPENSING SERVICES; TO ALLOW MOTOR Y�HICLE WASH ESTABLISHMENTS; TO ALLOW EXTERIOR STORAGE OF ��ERIAIS AND EQUIPMENT ALL ON LOTS 1 THROUGH 9 BLOCK li CENTRAL VIEW MANOR AND LOT 3 BLOCK 1 CENTRAL VIEW MANOR 2ND ADDITION GEIJERALLY IACATED AT 7355 HIGFIWAY 65 N E. (TABLED 10/15�90): l�s. Dacy, Plann3nq Coordinator, stated that this special use permit covers a variety of automotive related uses which would be located in an auto mall development. She stated that two buildings totaling 26,000 square feet would house these uses. She stated � ��: k� �� : : , � • .�� : Y�: : � ' � � - that in conjunction with this special use permit, there is aleo a reqL est to rezone a portion of the property froa 1�-1 to C-3 . Ms. Dacy atated that this itea was tabled to allow staff to resEarch what stipulations could be placed on this spacial use perait reqardinq the qeneration of odora from the automotive buildinq tanants. She.atated that there waa alao a concern reqardinq noise. Ms. Dacy stated that in addition to the sixteen stipulatfons reco mmended by the Planninq Commission, etaff ia proposinq three additional stipulations. She stated Stipulation No. 17 requires that the HVAC and odor ventfnq systems shall be desiqned with all possible desiqn features and equipment that is economically available to eliminate to the qreatest extent any possible odor emis aions from the auto mall or its individual tenants. She stated that odor ventinq systems for automotive paintinq, detailinq, or finiahinq tenants shall meet NFPA, EPA, and UFC conetruction and instsllation requirements. Ms. �cy etated that under Stipulation No. 18, if a problem were to o�:cur in the auto mall, Minr�esota Pollution Control Aqency rules and requlations would be imposed. She etated that these rules cont�in the odor emission standardB, and this procedure is similar to tl�e one used for the Central Roofinq Company complaint in 198T. She �tated that failure to meet the MPCA odor etandards ehall be a ba� �is for revocation of. the special use permit. Ms. :k�cy stated that Stipulation No. 19 states that doors on the nortli side of the buildinq shall be closed when vehicles are being serv:.ced or when noise ie qenerated. She stated that the Planninq Comm:.ssion also recommended that tenants that contribute to odor emis:;ions shall be located alonq the east side of the eastern most buil< linq on the site. Ms. liacy stated that the Council discussed some amended language to S:ipulation No. 16 reqarding the annual review process, and gtafi has worked with the petitioner who aqrees with an occupancy of n:nety percent. Ms. Iacy stated that a letter waB Bent to residents of the trailer park to the north alertinq them that this item was tabled at the last meeting and would be considered this eveninq. She Btated that staf! recommends approval of the special use permit with the Bixteen stipulations r_ecommended by the Planninq Commission in addition to staff's three atipulations. Mr. Mike Schrade�, representinq the petitioner, stated that all of the stigulations were acceptable. Mr. Mitch DeMars stated that he wanted to let the Council know that he is stronqly opposed to any extension of the service road. He FRIDLEY CI'1'Y CO[TNCIL ][EETINa O� NORE�[BER S, t990 pAQS � etated that he underetood it would be extended in 1992. He stated that he opposes the extension as it would hurt some of their tenants in the trailer park. Mayor Nee stated that the Council has not taken a position reqardinq the exteneion of the service road. Mr. DeMars stated that he felt if the auto mall surviveB, the extension of the service road would be diecussed in the future. Ms. Dacy stated that there may have been a misunderstanding, as she stated at the Planninq Commiseion meetinq, that in 1992 the upgrade of the sfqnalization at 73rd �ivenue would be completed. She stated that at no time did she atate the City had plans to extend the service road in 1992. Mr. DeMars stated that he understood it was stated at the Planning Commission neetinq that the service road was to be constructed in 1992. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorqenson to qrant Special Use Permit, SP �90-15, with the followinq stipulations: (1) the rezoninq request, ZOA �90-05, shall be approved; (2) the petitioner shall submit qrading and drainaqe plans of calculations approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to iesuance of the buildinq permit; (3) the petitioner shall submit a revised landscape plan prior to the issuance of the building permit, indicating the following changes: (A) reduce the berm at the intersection of 73 1/Z Avenue and Viron Road; (B) add six additional Linden trees somewhere on site; and (C) the wood screening fence alonq the north property line is currently unnecessary. However, the petitioner shall install a screeninq fence along the north property line if the existinq fence should for some reason be removed or damaqed; (4) the petitioner shall Bubmit an irriqation plan prior to issuance of the building permit; (5) the petitioner shall dedicate to the City a ten foot easement parallel to the east right-of-way line of Viron Road; (6) the petitioner shall combine the lots for tax purposes; (7) there shall be no exterior storage of junk vehicles, tires, or trailers. VehicZeB waitinq to be serviced shall be allowed to be stored overniqht, provided they are currently licensed and street operable; (8j any auto body repair and painting, facility and/or detailinq facility shall be required to obtain its own special use penait. Auto body repair and painting tenants shall comp2y with EPA requlations to control odor emissions and hazardous materials; (9.) there shall be no repair of automobiles before the hour of 7:00 a.m. and after the hour of 9:00 p.m.; (10) rooftop equipment shall be screened; (11) the petitioner shall submit a comprehensive siqn plan for City Council approval; (12) tenants who contribute to odor emissions shall be located alonq the east side of the eastern most buildinq on the eite; (13) the petitioner shall apply for a special use permit for any auto rental tenants; (14) a park fee of $.023 per.square foot shall be paid at � GSY CITY COIINCIL YS$TING Oa �OVEMHS� S. 1990 PAGB S the time of buildinq permit; (15) the petitioner shall work with the ltinnesota DepartAent of Tranaportation to stripe a rfqht turn lane to 73 1/2 avenue on Hiqhway 65; (16) compliance wfth the special uae permit shall be review�d after the project rQaches 90 perc�nt occupancy. The permit ahall be reviewed annually ther aafter up to five years; (17j the HVAC and odor ventinq systems ehall be deeiqned with a]1 possible aesiyn features and equipment that is economically available to eliminate to the qreatest extent any �ossible odor emissions from the auto mall or its individual tenaits. Odor venting systems for automotive paintinq, detailinq, or f..niehinq tenants shall meet NFPA, EPA, and UFC construction and inst�llation requirements; (18) in the caee of automotive paintinq, detailinq, or finishing tenants, odor emiesions will be evaluated in zccordance with the etandards established by the Minneaota Poll�ition Control Aqency, specifically Section 7005.0900 throuqh Sect.on 7005.0960. Failure to meet the MPCA odor standards shall be a basis for revocation of the apecial use permit; and (19) doors on tl �e north eide of the buildinq shall be closed when vehicles are bein�� serviced or when noise is qenerated. Seconded by Councilman Fitzy ►atrick. MOTIt iN by Councilman Billinqs to amend the above motion as follows: Unde�� Stipulation No. 17, add a comma at the end of the first Bent�:nce and add the words "includinq the restaurant." Further, to a� ld the followinq sentence at the end of Stipulation No. 17: �Venlinq shall be located in the area of the buildinq that fs the furttest distance from any residential neighborhood." Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee ceclared the motion carried unanimously. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAI�N ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayoi Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4. F�RST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE �Y OF FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA. BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS tTABLED 1Oj15 90): MOTIC K by Councilwoman Jorqenson to waive the readinq and approve the ordinance on first readinq. Seconded by Councilman Fitzp3trick. Councilman Billinqs asked if the lots to be rezoned were 7, 8 and 9 wh�ch included the auto mall project, except the restaurant porti�n. Ms. Dacy answered in the affirmative. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and 1Kayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL ItESTING O� �OVSMB$R 5. 1990 pAQ$ 6 5. 1�iPPOINTMENT TO THE �PPEAIS CO1�iISSION (TABLED 10�15/90 )i MOTION by Councilwoaan Jorqenson to table thie item. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the 'otion carried unanfmously. �1 BUSINESS • 6. RFSOLrI'r'TON NO. 88-1990 PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALF' OF 51.615.000 GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER REVENUE BONDS. SERIES 1991A: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that these bonds would be issued for the purpose of financinq various improvements to the water utility includinq the construction of the 1.5 million qallon water tank. He stated that total construction costs are $1,593,994 and the bonds would be dated January 1, 1991 for a twenty year period. He stated that all projects have previously been identified in the capital improvement proqram. Mr. Burns, City Manager, etated that there is a five percent limitation in reqard to borrowinq and asked how this would affect HI2A borrowing. Mr. Pribyl stated that this would pot restrict any HRA borrowinq. He stated that, however, an issuance of over $5,000,000 in 1991 may result in the City havinq to rebate arbitrage earninqs eo this would have to be watched. MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to adopt Resolution No. 88-1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. RESOLUTION NO. 89-1990 PROVIDING FOR P'UBLIC SALE OF S1 020 000 GENERAL OBL?GATTON IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 19918: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that proceeds from these improvement bonds will fund the assessable portions of nine projects completed or underway within the City. He stated that the projects included are Nos. 183 and 188, Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer; Street Improvement Projects for 1988, 1989, and 1990, and Water and Sewer Project No. 210. He stated these projects total $989,131. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 89-1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared�the motion carried unanimously. � h� IJ� 1� : ; e • ; • ��.iy1: : ; • � � : ; ` �� 4�� v �l� ` • " 4�� ; �� h� ��r • � ,rl� � � �� ti� : ; � � ti � ��1� , � � �}t�� ° � , y! � s � � � 4r� ��.' � �t� � �`� � ii • � !1� � ! i i � �i � ^ � 1 • i 4: . � � • � .s � � 1 � �r �s � • � .`�i s.� � Ks. ;�cy, Planninq Coordinator, stated that thie special use permit is zequested in order to construct a storaqe shed in the flood frin�e district. She stated that the Planninq Commission reconmended approval of the special use per�nit with two stipilations, which ahe outlined. MOTI)N by Councilman Billinqa to qrant Special Use Permit, SP #�0-17, with the followinq stipulations: (1� the petitioner shal'. execute a hold harmless aqreement to release the City from any Lfability or damaqes to the accessory building prior to the issu, �nce of a buildinq permit; and (2) any �naterialB which could caus�� potential water contamination such as fertilizerB, qasoline, oil, pesticides, etc., shall not be stored in the storaqe shed. Seco�ided by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � t� � • � • ��: • � • • ; � :�� i. � -r'� a Y�. � Y� i� 4f� • • � MOTI<�N by Councilman Billinqs to set the public hearinq for Novez�ber 19, 1990 on the proposed landscape amendments. Seconded by C�>uncilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayo� Nee declared the motion carried unanimouely. MOTI�N by Councilwoman Jorqenson to receive the minutes of the Planrinq Commission Meetinq of October 24, 1990. Seconded by Councilman Billinqe. Upon a voice vote, all votfng sye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � � t� _� � � � � ��r � � • • �. � ; � �►� • �! :. MOTICN by Councilwoman Jorgenson to set the public hearinq for Novea ber 19, 1990 reqardinq the collection of a recyclinq fee. Secon3ed by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Kayor Nee declared the �otion carried unanimously. � - . � . . . . • • _�_.�e� • • • • ;� - • 4s ••_� ;_ _; • 4 •� •� � '��. ti+ •� 4: � _ �l � � � � _�_� ,4 • MOTIOJ by Councilman Billinqs to approve a supplemental appro�riation of $5,300 from the Storm Water Reserve to the 1990 Storm Water Project for the 52nd Avenue storm drain extension. �RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL Y�$TI�O O! �TOV8M8g� S. 1990 B�a$ 8 Seconded by Councilaan Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Iriayor Nee dQClarsd the sotion carried unanimously. 11. �PPROVAL OF PROPOSED 1991 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRI_DLEY AND THE ANORA COUNTY CONIIKZJNICATIONS WORRSHOP: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the 1991 aqreement with the �noka County Communications Workahop. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, �tayor Nee declared the sotion carried unanimously. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 90-1990 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE TO THE CHURCH OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorqenson to adopt Resolution No. 90-1990. Seconded by Councilman Billinqs. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the mmotion carried unanimously. 13. RF�O�T't'?'ON NO. 91-1990 AUTHORIZING CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND, PARK IMPROV�MENT D�VISION• MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 91-990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. S - V . y � OVERLOOK: Ms. Dacy, Planninq Coordinator, stated that this plat creates two lots qenerally located at 1161 Reqis Lane. She stated that at the October 15, 1990 meeting, the Couricfl approved a registered land survey to clear the leqal description and title problems. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission, on May 17, 1989, recommended approval of this plat with two stipulations which she outlined. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 92-1990, with the two stipulations attached as Exhibit A. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. RFSOLUTION NO. 93-1990 APPROVING PLAT, P.S. �90-04. TARGET NORTHERN DISTRIBUTION CENTER 2ND ADDITION: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 93-1990, with the seven stipulations attached as Exhibit A. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that in reqard to Stipulation No. 1, there is an error and the Boston ivy shall be E �: h� �1; 1. : . � • i1� ��: Y1: : ; • i c . plar ted 8 feet or 96 inches on center, rather than 24 inches on cent er. MOT] ON by Councilaan Bfllinqs to amend Stipulation No. 1 in Exhibit �i b; � substitutinq 96 inches rather than 24 inchee. Seconded by Courcilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Kayor Nee declared the aotion carried unanimouely. UPOr l� VOICE VOTE Tl�REN ON THE 1�AIN MOTION, all voted aye, and I�aycr Nee declared the aotion carriad unani'ously. �_.. � .i� � • ' 1 � � i � Y� � �1�4�' i � � i y� � MOTI�N by Councilwoman Jorqenson to adopt Seccnded by Councilman Billings. Upon a aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carrie 17. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: ,r= � �:•�_ � 4� :� Resolution No. 94-1990. voice vote, all votinq d unanimously. Mr. Burns, City Manaqer, stated that a decision on a street liqht for this particular cul-de-sac could set a precedent for street liqhts in cul-de-sacB throuqhout the City. He stated that he would like the matter to be discussed by the full Council. • �-� '�� Mr. E�'lora, Public Works Director, etated that the City removed the concrete material in one culvert on October 24 that controlled the level of Locke Lake. He stated that in the process, the water leve L of Locke Lake was dropped, and there ie no lake but only Rice Creek runninq throuqh the area. Mr. F'lora stated that there will be a meetinq on November 13 at 3:00 p.m. at the Municipal Center reqarding improvements proposed for Locke Lake. He stated that there will be representatives presant from the Rice Creek Watershed District, Anoka County's Highray Department, Park Department, and Soil and Water Cons�rvation District, the Department of Natural Resources, the Army Corps of Enqineers, the Board of Soil and Water Resources, and the Locke Lake Homeowners Association to assure that all the neceasary requirements for the Locke Lake project are pursued. He stat:d that a draft report is expected in April or May with action to b: determined in June, 1991. Coun:ilwoman Jorqenson asked if the qeneral public is invited to atteid this meetinq. tRIDLEY CITY CODI�ICIL l[E$TI�3 O� �04$MHBR S, 1990 P�GE 10 Mr. Flora stated that it is a aeetinq �ore for staff to identify the requirements for the project; however, the qeneral public could attend if they so desired. Councilman Billinqs nsked what effect the removal of the concrete will have on what is remaininq of the dam. Idr. Flora stated he felt that by removinq the concrete, it reduced the pressure so there probably will not be any further deterioration of the box culverts. =.i`�Ii��=liF��`�� Mr. Burns, City Manaqer, atated that tha Council has discussed the possibility of a sex related business ordinance. He stated that this item would be discussed before the Planninq Commission at their December meetinq. He stated that staff is working with Anoka County to try to establish a joint approach relatinq to sex oriented businesses. He stated that staff is also continuing work reqardinq an amendment of the State Obscenity Statute to deal with businesses that the current statute does not address. Mayor Nee asked if the languaqe of the licensinq ordinance would be included in the zoninq ordinance. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that, presently, he prefers to have a separate chapter in the code that deals with sex related businesses and that it be similar to provisions the City has for on-eale liquor licenses. He stated that the chapter would outline the requirements for obtaininq a license and who is eliqible. He stated that it would indicate the distance such an establishment must be from residential areas, parks, playqrounds, schools, and churches and will provide the procedure for obtaining a license and for suspension or revocation of a license. Mr. Herrick stated that, in addition, there will be some amendments to Chapter 205 of the Zoninq Code to indicate in which of the several zones this type of businese is permitted. He stated that there will likely be an amendment to Chapter 11, the fee chapter, which will outline the fees. He stated that it will primarily be in its own chapter, but there will be a need for some chanqes in Chapter 11 and Chapter 205. � . . • • . . ; __ .; -;. . . 4� • � Mayor Nee stated that t.here is some question if there should be a formal statement of Council rules. He Btated that if the rules of the Council do not speak on the question, then, qenerally, Roberts' Rules apply. - Councilman Billings stated that on october 1, 1990, and prior to this meetinq, he requested that the City Manaqer place an item on y� �� 1. . , c • • �♦ .� ,.1 • ; � e . the aqenda. He stated that the item was on the aqenda under Infcrmal Status Reports. He stated that, to his surprise, apparently the rulee of the Council are that no action ie taken unless the specific item ie on the aqenda. Councilman BillinqB stated that in reviewinq the sinutes over the last three years, there are a number of aotions where action was taken. He atated that Councilman Schneider has �ade 'otions to request or direct staff to do certain thinqs. He atated that he is c�nfused as to the rules, particularly when he requested that the �tem be placed on the aqenda and it was placed where he did not know it could not have an action taken. He Btated that he wanted a diacussion of the rules, aB he doesn't want to play a qame where he d�es not know the rules, as ft puts him at a disadvantaqe. Coun:ilman Billinqs stated that in Roberts' Rules of Order anyone can nake a motion at any time for action or to table. He stated that it is appropriate if you are discussinq an item to make a moti�n in reqard to it. He stated that there must be eome rules the :ouncil adopted alonq the line in addition to Roberts' Rules of 0-der and wanted to be informed of those rules. Coun�:ilwoman Jorgenson stated, basically, her understandinq is that item:� that are not on the agenda are not up for action. She stated that the Informal Status Reports is somethinq new where citizens come and request an updated staff report on issues. She stated that there was some discussion on whether the Council would allow acti��n items under�Informal Status Reports. She stated that she and :ouncilman Schneider both aqreed they would like to receive addii.ional staff input and consider it at another point in time. She :tated that she did not think anyone was tryinq to change the rulee, but maybe the iesue iB clouded as to what rules apply. She statEd that she apoloqizes if Councilman Billinqs was sliqhted becatse that was not the intent. She etated that if the Council is qcinq to take action on items that are not an aqenda item, it has 10 be discussed. She stated that from the information qiven reqa2dinq rules of other councils in local communities, it iB obvicus they are all handled differently. She felt that the Council, as a body, would have to diacuss it. Mayox Nee stated that this puts a burden on him to epell out on paper what he has been doinq instinctively. He stated that he would just as soon have the Council adopt its own rules. Mr. H:rrick, City Attorney, felt that before any rules are adopted, he wculd like his office to review them to make sure they do not viola te any State statute or notice requirements for open meetinqs . CouncLlman Bill�ngs stated that he ia not askinq anyone to work to creat: any rules or for the City Attorney to review new rules. He statei that he has a fairly decent handle on what the Council has been doinq. He etated that, in a nutshell, it boils down to /: • 'i� �1._ �. . � • ,� ��, ,�- � c . Roberts� Rules of Order. He stated that the only provision is that if items came under Open Forum, the Council took the poeition not to take action on thoee �attere. Iie felt that is the correct position because it is qenerally new �aterial that is preeented. He stated that he did not see a need to modify Roberts� Rules of Order, exclusive of the Open Forn4. He stated that in terms of the Informal Status Reporte, the item he requeated be placed on the aqenda, which was the stop siqn on Trollhaqen, wae placed under Informal Status Reports. He Btated that he was prepared to make a recommendation to the Council. He etated that prior to discussing this item, he made a motion relatinq to Ashton Avenue that was ruled out of order. He stated that he dfd not feel that, other than new ftems that are presented under Open Forum, a motion for action under Informal Status Reports was out of order. He stated that if any member of the Council is not comfortable with the motion, they could move to table it. He felt that they did not need to do any tremendeus modifications. Mayor Nee felt that if that is the problem, it could be settled. He stated that in reqard to the Ashton Avenue motion, it was not Councilman Billinqs' ward. Councilman Billings pointed out that the Ward Councilmember was qeiick to second his motion. Mr. Herrick Btated that, clearly, the Council can adopt their own rules. He stated that, in doing Bo, the Council should bear in mind that Roberts' Rules of Order are not drawn specifically for public bodies. He felt that perhaps there should be some modifications because of the fact that the Council is a public body. He questioned that, for instance, would the Council be able to propose and adopt a ealary increase without placing it on the agenda. He thought that probably leqally they could do it. Whether it would be the thinq they would want to permit he feels is questionable. He stated it Beems to him that anythinq of any substance should be placed on the aqenda Bo people in the community have some advance notice to be present and express themselves. He stated if there are items that are acted on by the Council that are never plaaed on the aqenda, you limit the input of citizens. Mayor Nee felt there should be some provisions that probably set a hiqher votinq criteria for items that are not on the aqenda. Ne stated that the issue is really how items come before the Council. Councilman Billinqs stated that the other aspect is more the spontaneous motion or action items. He etated that in the example cited by the City Attorney, it probably would be inappropriate, but at the same time, the five persons elected by the voters have enouqh intelliqence that they would not do such a thinq. He stated that in terms of spontaneous motions, he asked that they all be treated alike. He etated that there are times the Council is discussinq items on the aqenda, a motion is made to zequest or �j��Y CITY COIINCIL lLE8TI�3 O! �OVBMB$R S. 1990 p�aE 13 dirECt staff to do cQrtain thinqB, which are aometiaes related, and some of those are accepted and other times spontanaoua aotions are not accepted and ruled out of ordsr. He stated that he is sure eve�yone has attended meetinqs where spontaneous aotions come up undEr new business and were actad on. Courcilwoman Jorgenson felt that coneideration has to be qiven as to �rhat criteria is used where the Council can or cannot take act�on under Infor�al Status Report ftems. She questioned whether theFe would be emerqency items or what type of ftems would be considered where action may be appropriate immediately or delayed. Mr. Eierrick etated that maybe part of the problem is perhape tryinq to differentiate between requestinq the staff to do somethinq and takinq actions that are beyond that ccope. He atated that he really did not know how to differentiate. He stated that, for instnnce, if one of the Councilmembers wanted a member of staff to give them some information, he did not think it needed to be on the aqen3a, and if it probably doesn�t require a motion, then ft could be a request. He felt that perhaps some thouqht should be qiven to attempt to differentiate between those eorts of thinqs. Mr. Burns, City Manaqer, stated that the City of Minnetonka's� ordilance addresses that subject to some extent. Mayor Nee etated that to simply take an item that has not been on the 'genda for action, he would think is out of order. He stated that the case in point is what is covered under Informal Status Repo:ts. He stated that he has had a problem over the years how item3 are placed on the agenda. He stated that some are required, but ;►ome are discretionary. He stated that there are orqanizations that have agenda meetings several days in advance of their reqular meet�nq. He stated that an alternative may be for the Council to have an aqenda meetinq. He suqqested that he and the City Attorney atte:npt to work somethinq out. Coun� :ilman Billings atated that Mr. Tinklenberg made a presentation to t,he Council under Open Forum reqarding the Anoka County Trav�:ler. He stated that Mr. Tinklenberq's intent was to obtain a sense from the Council if they were supportive of the Anoka Coun� :y Traveler. He stated that this was an instance where the Coun� :il could not create an agenda item for action until they heard the i�resentation. He stated that without an action item to place on tlie aqenda, the City Manager placed Mr. Tinklenberq under the Open Forum of the aqenda. He stated that Mr. Tinklenberq left with��ut knowing if the Council eupported his idea. He stated that he d:,d not think it wae necessary for Mr. Tinklenberq to wait for seve��al weeks aad felt a motion could have been made that eveninq to iistruct the City Manaqer to draft a letter indicatinq the Counc�il'e support. He felt this was somethinq that did not need �RIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ItE$TINa O� �OV$MBBR S. 1990 p�GE 14 notice to the aitizene. He felt there are some things that come up that are informal enouqh that action could be taken at the aoment. Kayor Nee stated that it depends on the nature of what the Council is going to take the action on or if it ie somethinq they aeed to think about for several weeks. Councilwoman Jorqeneon �tatad that because of public input, sometimes the Council �ay chanqe their minds even thouqh an item is on the agenda. She asked how it is determined if an item is important and neede action i�mediately or if it can wait for several weeks. She stated that she did not know how to eimplify it. Councilman Billings stated that if Coucilwomen Jorqenson needs every motion laid out on paper, then this iB how it Bhould be done. He stated that he felt Councilwoman Jorqenson is missinq the whole point and requested they proceed to the next agenda item. 18. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to authorize payment of Claims No. 34557 through 34814. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 19. LiCENSES: . MOTION by Councilwoman Jorqenson to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. ESTIMATES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted: Insituform Central, Inc. 17988 Edison Avenue Chesterfield, MO 63005 Storm Sewer Pipe Repair Project No. 209 (Onondaqa Street) �INAI. BSTIMAT$ . .- . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 38,801.20 y� �� ._ 1: . , e • • '� -. � � • ; � c : Keyc Well Drillinq Co�pany 413 North Lexinqton Parkway St. Paul, l+� 55104 Monitorinq Wells at Commons Park, Project No. 208 ?INAL B8TIM11T8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12 ,159 . 00 Her� �ick & Newman 205 Fridley Plaza Office Bldq. 640� University Avenue N.E. Fric ley, l�N 55432 Services Rendered ae City �ittorney for the Month of October, 1990 .......$ 6,276.28 Newc uist � Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Bldq. 6401 University Avenue N.E. Frid ley, 1�1 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecutinq Attorney for the Month of August, 1990 ...$ 8,030.00 AEC sngineerB & Desiqners 511 - ilth Avenue South Minn :apolis, l�i 55415 Phase II - 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 200 (Inspection Services) Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7, 598 . 07 Lind� �hl & Carlson 1821 University Avenue Suit� : N318 St. 3 �aul, l+al 55104 1990 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Project Estimate No. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,120.75 WestErn Waterproofing 2838 Stevens Avenue South IKinnE apolis, l�T 55408 Phase II - 3 MG Concrete Reservoir Repair Project No. 200 - Estimate No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $115, 403.7b ?�IDLEY CITY CODNCIL l[E$TINa O! liIOVEMB$R S, 1990 PAa$ 16 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Idayor Nee declared the motion carried unani�ously. �D.70URNMENT: MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to adjourn the meetinq. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. .Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Reqular Meetinq of the Fridley City Council of November 5, 2990 adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: � � . ..:Ei� . .. � �� O� � a�� .�` � � . . l�IIDL1iY CIT�L t30OItQIL 1[i�'!I� O! �OVi�1L8sR 13, 1!!0 .� : ,' ��, `� ;�f, °� .;� . ��!- �l�l+ • 4:�: Y�: , c . 4:�- � � �• ��: • • �: 1: � The : pecial Meetinq of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7 30 p.m. by Mayor Nee. �• �� MEMB];RS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorqenson, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilman Billings MEMBI�RS ABSENT: Councilman Schneider MOTIC �N by Councilman Billinqs to adopt the agenda as presented. Secoided by Councilman Fitzpatrick. MOTIC N by Councilman Billings to amend the agenda by addinq an Open Forun item. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousiy. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and MayoY Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. QPEN : Ms. Carole Haddad, 910 Rice Creek Terrace, addressed the Council reqax3ing the new water storage tank adjacent to Hiqhway 65. She state3 that she had a"birds eye" view of this huge storaqe tank which really was not aesthetically pleasing to see from her livinq room aindow. She inquired as to the proposal for lettering and if any �:onsideration could be given to locate the letterinq to minimize the impact on the residences. Mr. FLora, Public Works Director, stated that the City does have plans to identify the water storage tank with the name of Fridley and tie City's loqo. He stated that the lettering would probably be pl�ced to the north and south. CouncLlman Billinqs suqgested that possibly the letterinq could be place�i to the east and west. It was the consensus af the Council that the proposal for letterinq on this tank should be reviewed befor� : it is installed to attempt to minimize the impact on the resid�sntial neighborhood. N / 4� �Y! �l� • ° -_'� _ • � 4t�� /�Y�� }� • � �; . 4 � � Ma. 3hirley Haapala, City Clark, conqratulated Councilman Fitzp�,triak and Councilman Billinqs on their reelection. FRID�BY CITY COIINCIL iiEBTINa 08 �OVEMBBR 13, 1990 P��$ 2 Ms. Haapala stated that there was a larqe turnout for this election, and the judqes did a super job. She stated that there were a lot of write-ins, but most of the precincts were in by 12:30 a.m. Coun:ilman Fitzpatrick asked the number of reqistered voters. Ms. Haap�la stated that there are 17,482 registered voters and 1,027 pers �ns registered to vote on election day. She stated that takinq into account the persons who reqistered to vote on election day, the :urnout was about 65 percent. Mayo� Nee stated he was told that he had to vote on every office or t:ie ballot would be rejected. Ms. 3aapala stated that the instructions to the election judges were to advise the voter if they did not vote for any offices that thei:�ballot would be returned. She stated that the judqes� ballot was returned, if a voter did not vote for at least one of the judg� :s. Mayo:� Nee asked if there was not some other way this could be hand: .ed. Ms. �;aapaia stated that this would not have occurred if everythinq was � �n one ballot. Counc.ilman Billings stated that the oniy neqat�ve comment he heard from a number of persons was in regard to printing on both sides of tYe ballot. He stated that, in his case, it did not make a lot of d:.fference, but would imagine some people did not vote on the schocl issue because they did not turn the ballot over. Ms. �: aapala stated that it will have to be stressed to the election judgE s that if there is a back side to the ballot to be sure to instzuct the voter to turn it over. She felt that the judges may have been overwhelmed, not only by the ballots, but by the large turncut. She stated that it was busy the entire time the polls were �pen. Ms. Faapala stated that another comment she heard was that there should have been more booths. She stated that if more booths had been provided, however, there would have been a backlog in voters waitinq to deposit their ballots. It w�s noted that in reqard to the levy referendum for School District No. 13 that there was a typoqraphical error involvinq the overv �tes, School District 14 ballots, and the Totals for W-2, P-3 a zd W-2, P-4. MOTI0�1 by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive and approve the Stateaent of Canvass for the November 6, 1990 General Election. Seconied by Councilwoman Jorqenaon. r 1. 1 kt �1. Y�.` 1 C � /��. Y�.' 1 � i � MOTI�N by Councilman Billinqs to note the typoqraphical error in rega rd to the levy referendwa in School District No. 13 and correct it t� show that there were no Overvotes in W-2, P-3 and W-2, P-4 and �he number of School District 14 Ballots for W-2, P-3 was 926 and '>38 for W-2, P-4. The totals chanqe as follows: W-2, P-3, 1020 and 1534 for W-2, P-4. The finai total chanqes as follows: Overiotes, 1; School District 14 Ballots, 2113 and Total, 4525. Secoided by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. UPON A VOICE VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee deci,�red the motion carried unanimously. ' i� � �tsc4�� se ' _ � MOTI�►N by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the followinq appo..ntment by the City Manager: Name Rich� .rd Alva� �ado .• •� Public Services Worker A.1 Non- Exempt Starting Salarv $9.62 per hour $1,673.88 per month Starting Date Nov. 14, 1990 �-. . -- James Saefke Secoided by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOL �ENT : MOTICN by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Cc�uncilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, MayoY Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Special Meeting of the Fridley City Council of November 13, 1990 adjourned at 8:17 p.m. Respeatfully submitted, Carol a Haddad Secretary to the City Council Appro �ed : William J. Nee Mayor MEMORANDUM 1 �1 CIN( fF FRIDL EY Municipal C�nt�r 6431 Univ�rsity Avenu� N.E. Fridl�y� MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 Offics ot the City Maneger William W. Burns TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FRCMs William W. Burns, City Managerc(• ,{ � . Dl�7 'B s SIIl J$CT s November 16, 1990 Public Hearinq on 1991 Budqet Wii,h the approval of Mayor William J. Nee and the members of the Fr:.dley City Council, the public hearinq on the 1991 budget will coi �nnence with the City Manaqer's budget message for the City of Fr: .dley. WWl t: rsc FINANCE DEPARTMENT 2 � MEMORANDUM TO: WILLIAl►t W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER /h •�� FRONt: RICHARD D. PRIHYL, FINANC$ DIRECTOR BIIB7ECT: RE80LIITION ADOPTINQ A BIIDGET FOR THE FZSCAL YEAR 1991 DA4L: NOVEMBER 14, 1990 The attached resolution provides for the adoption of the 1991 Bucget. In the past, budgets have been adopted through an orcinance. However, due to changes made in the City Charter earlier this year, the budget is now adopted through a resolutian. Sirce Council's review of the budget on October 29, 1990, the peYSOnal services sections of the budget have been updated and now include the additional $15 per month contribution to employees he�lth insurance premiums. This will increase the current City cortribution by $30. These adjustments resulted in a$9,520 increase in the General Fund Budget. RD� /sf Att achment Ii�;80i�IQ�T - 1990 A RE80I�fI'IQI�i AD�PTII� A BfJDC�EP I10R '� FISt�L 7iS�R 1991 2A Wf� 2EAS, Chapter 7, Sec.�tion 7.04 of tl�e City Ct�arte,r provides that the City Man iger stsall prepare an annual b�d+get; arrd WI� 2EAS, the City Manager has prepated s�irh �t ar�d the City �il has met several times for the p�uxpose of disc,v.s.sirig tt�e budget; at�d Wf� 2EAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minr�esata Statutes requires 'that the Gity sha Ll hold a public heariryg to adapt a btr]get; arxi Wf� REAS, the City Cotuicil has held a public hearit�g arid has ooncluded the budget as prepared is apprapriate; N(74 Zi�2EFbRE, BE IT RE50LUED, that the fol2aair�g buc�get be adopted arid ap� roved: GE� ERAL FUND Taxes and Special Assessments: Current Ad Valorem Delinquent, Penalties, Forfeited Special Assessments Licenses and Permits: Licenses Permits Intergovernmental: Federal State - Homestead and Agriculture Credit Aid Local Government Aid All Other Charges for Services Fines and Forfeits interest on Investments Miscellaneous Revenues Other Financing Sources: Sales of General Fixed Assets Housing and Redevelopment Authority Water Fund Sewer Fund Storm Water Fund Special Assessment Encumbrances Fund IRDB Deposits Fund Liquor Fund Construciion Funds Employee Benefit Fund Closed eond Fund Cable TV Fund TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Fund Balance: Designated for repl of fixed assets General Fund Reserve TOTAL GENERAL FUND ESTIMATED REVENUE $3,700,307 73,531 1,495 152,074 193,174 5,000 846,304 � ,�a3,o90 469,492 210,976 272,147 205,166 26,030 20,000 157,297 143,430 76,803 25,636 13,530 9,898 88,674 36,750 100.000 192,272 5,000 8,768,076 47,450 153,233 58,968,759 Legistative: City Council Planning Commissions Other Commissions City Management: General Management Personnel Legal Finance: Elections Accounting Assessing MIS City Cle�k/Records Police: Police Civil Defense Fire: Public Works: Civic Center Technical Engineering Traffic Engineering Street Lighting PubliC Works MaintenanCe Recreation: Naturalist Recreation Community Development: Building Enforcement Planning Reserve: Emergency Nondepartmental: APPROPRIATIONS $104,814 4,344 29,001 281,196 76,151 168,041 t 0,666 503,104 159,968 206,275 85,900 2,730,556 9,299 653,632 175,960 395,053 59,458 147,911 1,690,619 226,438 488,380 173,925 304,212 250,000 33,856 58,968,759 ES'TIMATED REVENUE SP� :CIAL REVENUE FUNDS Cable N Fund $73,197 Grant Management Fund 192,405 Solid Waste Abatement Fund 217,359 TOTAL SPEqAL REVENUE Ft1NDS s482,961 CA'ffAL PRWECTS FUNDS Capital Imprwement Fund Taxes - Current Ad Valorem Interest on Investments Donations Miscellaneous Fund Baiance TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS AG ENCY FUND Six Cities Watershed Fund Taxes - Current Ad Valorem TOTAL AGENCY FUND TOTA� 585,550 523,883 10,000 11,650 415,417 a,,oas.soo 53,500 53,500 St 0.501,720 General Capital Improvement Parks Capital Improvement Street Capital Improvement pA� ;Ep AND ADpFI�D BY TF� CITY OWNQL OF Zi� QTY OF FRIDIEY TFIIS _ , 1990. Sh:rley A. Haapala - City Clerk william J. Nee - Mayor . 2B 573,197 192,4Q5 217,359 s482.961 5203,000 202,500 641,000 31,046.500 53,500 33,500 510,501,720 OAY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3 � MEMORANDUM ► � TO : FR �M: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGBR �,. � �. RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCB DIRECTOR SUBJECT: RESOLIITION TO LEDY TABEB WHICH APPEAit TO BS IN $BCESS OF 16 MILLB, TH$ NE$D TO LEVY A SPBCIAL LEVY, AND CERTIFYING TA% LEVY REQIIIREMFNTB FOR 1991 TO ANORA COUNTY DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 1990 Th e attached resolution grants City Council the authority to levy a tax which appears to be in excess of 16 mills and to levy a sXecial levy for the unfunded portion of the police pension liability. A� stated in Section 7.02 of the City Charter, pursuant to three weeks published notice and a public hearinq the Council may adopt a resolution showing the necessity for such taxes. Tie attached resolution also provides for the certification of the 1591 tax levy to Anoka County for collection. RI P/sf At tachment 3A RESOLIITION - 1990 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE NECESSITY TO LEVY A TAX WHICH APPEARS TO BE IN EXCESS OF 16 MILLS, THE NEED FOR A SPECIAL LEVY, AND CERTIFYING TAX LEVY REQUIREMENTS FOR 1991 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR COLLECTION WHI�REAS, Chapter Seven, Section 7.02 of the Charter of the City of Fr:dley, grants the City the power to raise money by taxation pu�•suant to the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WH]�REAS, said Section 7.02 of the City Charter provides that if thF: taxes levied against property within the City exceeds 16 mills on each dollar of assessed valuation, that the Council shall adopt a:�esolution showing the necessity for such tax; and WHI;REAS, the State of Minnesota has changed the method of co�iputing taxes from "mill levy" to "tax capacity"; and WHI;REAS, the State of Minnesota transferred state aid dollars from th�: city to the school districts to reduce school district taxes; anc l WH];REAS, in addition, the State of Minnesota reduced the amount of st��te aid dollars it has previously distributed to cities; and WH];REAS, the City of Fridley needs to levy taxes which appear to be in excess of 16 mills because of the reduction of local go��ernment aids by the State of Minnesota; and WHI;REAS, the City of Fridley needs to levy a special levy for the un'unded portion of the police pension liability. N01f THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fr.dley pursuant to three (3) weeks published notice and a public he� �ring on the 19th day of November, 1990, shall have the authority to levy a tax which may be in excess of 16 mills, and to levy a sp�:cial levy for the unfunded portion of the police pension li��bility in 1990 for the year 1991; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Fridley certify to the Co��nty Auditor of the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, the fo:.lowing tax levy to be levied in 1990 for the year 1991. GENERAL FUND Levy Subject to Limitation Special Levy - Unfunded Accrued Liability of the Police Pension Fund Subject to Levy Limitation $ 7,486 Not Subject to Levy Limitation 103.683 TOTAL GENERAL FUND CAIITAL PROJECT FUND Capital Improvement Fund Subject to Levy Limitation AGl ;NCY FUND Six Cities Watershed Management Organization Subject to Levy Limitation TOTAL ALL FUNDS 3B $4,549,107 111.169 �4;_660.276 $ 87,689 $ 3,500 PA�SED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. Willam J. Nee - Mayor Shirley A. Haapala - City Clerk � � c�nroF F�� DATE ; TO: C0�1/IMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM November 13, 1990 ��- William Burns, City Manager �• FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Lisa Campbell, Planninq l�asociat• 80&7ECT: Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance Establishing Solid Waste Abatement Program Fee As per Council direction, staff has prepared an ordinance establishing the Solid Waste Abatement Program Fee. The public heazing and first readinc� of the ordinance is scheduled for November 19, 1990. In crder to implement the Solid Waste Abatement fee, an ordinance amerding Chapter 113, Solid Waste Disposal and Recyclinq, and Cha�ter il, General Provisions and Fees, of the City Code is reqtired. Without an ordinance, the City may not legally receive the revenue generated from the proposed fee. Seciion 113.06, as proposed, formally establishes and defines the Sol'd Waste Abatement Proqram. This section specifica2ly states whai.activities are included in the Solid Waste Abatement Program. The:e are the curbside collection program, the purchase and disi.ribution of curbside recycling containers, the drop-off site, the yard waste transfer site, and special abatement programs. Sec':ion 113.07, as proposed, formally establishes the Solid Waste Aba�:ement Program Fee and the Solid Waste Abatement Program Fund. It : tates that residential dwellinq units of one to four units will be ��ssessed $2.50 per quarter per unit and that this revenue will be ��laced in the Solid Waste Abatement Program Fund. This section sti��ulates that this revenue will be expended on Solid Waste Aba:ement activities. � Cha�ter il, General Provisions and Fees, Section 11.10, Fees for Ser�ices Rendered, is amended to include the fee established under Sec :ion 113 . 07 . 4 ' ', Ordinance Establishing Solid Waste Abatement Program Fee Nov �mber 13, 1990 Pag : 2 Rationale for Fee The Solid Waste Abatement Program Fee is needed to offset the costs of the Solid Waste Abatement Program. In 1991, the fee will underwrite a portion of the costs associated with the purchase of cor.tainers and contract service costs for the curbside program and yazd waste transfer site. The container purchase is needed to increase participation in order to meet the 35� abatement goal by Jaruary 1, 1994, established by the State in 1989. Contract costs are likely to rise with the participation and exceed the projected gr�nt revenue in 1991. St�ff Recommendation St�ff requests that the Council establish a public hearing for No�ember 19, 1990, and conduct a first reading at that time. LC; ls M-� 0-808 ORDINANC$ NO. - 1990 AN ORDINANC$ RECODIFYING TH8 FRIDLEY CITY CODE CBAPTSR 113, ENTITLL'D "SOLID WABTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLIN�i COLLECTION'�, BY ADDINQr SBCTIOldB 113.06 AND 113.07, "SOLID WAST$ ABATEMBNT PROGRAI�IMIN(i�� AND "SOLID WABTE PRO(iRl�M FE$��, A�ID R$I�1IIMB8RINa T88 PREBBNT BBCTIONB 113.06 TO 113.08 111�1D 113.07 TO 113.09� AND T8E REMAININa 88CTIONB CONS$CIITIVELY; FQRTB$R AMENDINQ CHAPTBR 11 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODB $NTITLED ��G$NSRAL PROVISIONB AND FESB��, SLCTION 11.10. The City Council of the City of Fridley hereby ordains as follows: Section 113 06 Solid Waste Abatement Proaram The Citv of Fridlev. in order_ to meet the reauirements of State La� � sez anc recemption center for recyclables a yard waste transfer site, ana otYer special abatement activities as authorized bv the Citv Cot ncil. . Section 113 07 Solid Waste Abatement Proctram Fee Ef:'ective January 1 1991 the Citv of Fridley shall becrin charainct re:idential dwellings of one to four units 52.50 per unit per gu�rter The fee shall be charged in coniunction with the utilitv bi: linas as administered by the Finance DeDartment. This fee shall be called the Solid Waste Abatement Program Fee. This revenue sh;�ll be _placed in the Solid Waste Abatement Fund and shall be �>ended on solid waste programmincr activities. These activities in��Zude the curbside collection of rec,yclables for residential dw��llinas of one to four units the purchase and distribution of cu. re� ab 4B Ch�pter 11. General Provisions and Fees Se;tion 11.10 is amended as follows: 11,10 Fees for Services Rendered Code 113.07 Subiect Solid Waste Programminq Fee Fee 52.50 per residential dwellina of 1-4 units per quarter 4C ORD]NANCE NO. - 1990 PAGE 2 PAS:ED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR ATT: :ST : SHI2LEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK Public Hearing: November 19, 1990 Fir st Reading: Sec �nd Reading: Publish: 0 � PLANNING DNISION 5 � MEMORANDUM cinroF F�� DA".'E: November 15, 1990 �� TO William Burns, City Manager lllr' FR�iM: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SU: �,7ECT: Public Hearing for Landscape Amendments to the Zoning Code At�:ached are the proposed landscape amendments to the zoning code. Th�: ordinance requires the City Council to hold a public hearing fo� all ordinance amendments. Staff recommends that the City Co�►ncil hold the public hearing. The ordinance prepared for the fi-st reading will occur later in the agenda. Th: proposed landscape amendments will serve the following pu -poses : 1. Standardize and modernize the City's landscape requirements. 2. Provide consistent enforcement from site to site. 3. Provide "flexible" requirements based on the size of each individual parceZ. MM �dn M- �0-823 5A 6. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS A. Scope. All open areas of any site, except for areas used for parking, driveways, or storage shall be landscaped and incorporated in a landscape plan. (1) All new developments requiring a building permit shall comply with the requirements of this section. (2) Existing developments shall comply with the requirements of this section if one or more of the following applies: a. At the time of a building expansion or alteration which dictates the necessity for additional parking or hardsurface areas in excess of four (4) stalls. b. Building alterations which dictate a change in use such that the parking area must be expanded in excess of four (4) stalls. c. Construction of additional loading docks. d. Construction of new parking areas in excess of four (4) stalls. (3) If full compliance cannot be achieved due to site constraints, partial compliance as determined by the City shall be enforced. (4) The requirements of this section shall not be required for building alterations which do not affect the exterior portions of the site. B. Bonding Requirement The City shall retain a performance bond, cash or letter of credit, as required in Section 205.05.06.A.(3) of the zoning code for one growing season after the installation of landscape materials is completed. C. Plan Submission and Approval. (1) A landscape plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City prior to issuance of a building permit or prior to approval of outside improvements not related to building improvements. A plan shall not be required for routine replacement of existing materials or the installation of new materials when not associated with a buildinq project. (2) The following.items shall appear on the landscape plan: a. General 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) b) 7) Name and address of owner/developer Name and address of architect/designer Date of plan preparation Dates and description of all revisions Name of project or development Scale of pZan (engineering scale only) at no smaller than 1 inch equals 50 feet North point indication b. Landscape Data 1) Planting schedule (table) containing: 2) 3) 4) 5) a) b) c) d) e) Symbols Quantities Common names Botanical names Sizes of plant material at time of planting f) Root specification (B.R., B& B, potted, etc.) g) Special planting instructions Existing tree and shrubbery, locations, common names and approximate size Planting detail (show all species to scale at normal mature crown diameter, or spread for local hardiness 2one) Typical sections in detail of fences, tie walls, planter boxes, tot lots, picnic areas, berms, and other similar features. Typical sections of landscape islands and planter beds with identification of materials used. 5B 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Details of planting beds and f plantings. Note indicating how d will be restored ti sodding, seeding, or Delineation of areas with total feet, and slope 5C �ci soil areas the use of techniques. sodded and seeded provided in square �ation. Coverage plan for �underground irrigation system, if any. Statement or symbols, o describe exterior lighting plan concept. c. Special Conditions: Where landscape or man-made materials are used to provide required screeninq from adj acent and neighboring properties, a cross-section shall be provided through the site and adjacent properties to show property elevation, existing buildings and screening in scale. D. Landscaping Materials; Definitions. All plant materials shall be living plants. Artificial plants are prohibited. (1) (2) Grass and ground cover. a. Ground cover shall be planted in such a manner as to present a finished appearance and reasonably complete coverage within twelve (12) months after planting, with proper erosion control during plant establishment period. Exception to this is undisturbed areas containinq natural vegetation which can be maintained free of foreign and noxious materials. b. Accepted ground covers are sod, seed, or other organic material. The use of rock and bark mulch shall be limited to areas around other vegetation (i.e. shrubs) and shall be contained by edging. Trees. a. Over-story Deciduous. 1) A woody plant, which at maturity is thirty 5D (30) feet or more in height, with a single trunk un-branched for several feet above the qround, having a defined crown which looses leaves annually. 2) Such trees shall have a 2 1/2 inch caliper minimum at planting. b. Ornamental. 1) A woody plant, which at maturity is less than thirty (30j feet in height, with a single trunk un-branched for several feet above the ground, having a defined crown which looses leaves annually. Z) Such trees shall have a 1 1/2 inch caliper minimum at plantinq. c. Coniferous. Ij A woody plant, which a maturity is at least thirty (30) feet or more in height, with a single trunk fully branched to the ground, havinq foliage on the outenaost portion of the.branches year-round. 2) Such trees shall be six (6) feet in height at planting. (3) Shrubs. a. Deciduous or evergreen plant material, which at maturity is fifteen (15) feet in height or less. Such materials may be used for the formation of hedges. Such materials shall meet the following minimum standards at time of planting: 1) Dwarf deciduous shrubs shall be eighteen (18) inches tall. 2) Deciduous shrubs shall be twenty-four (24) inches tall, except as in Section D below. 3) Evergreen shrubs shall be of the eighteen (18) inch classification. (4) Vines. Vines shall be at least twelve (12) inches high at planting, and are generally used in conjunction with walls or fences. 5E (5) Slopes and Berms. a. Final slope grades steeper than 3:1 will not be permitted without special approval or treatment such as terracing or retaining walls. b. Earth berm screening parkinq lots and other open areas shall not have slopes exceeding 3:1. A minimum three (3) foot berm is required. E. Perimeter Landscaping; Standards. (1) In order to achieve landscaping which is appropriate in scale with the size of a building and site, the minimum standards apply: a. One (1) tree for every one thousand (1,000) square feet of total building floor area or one (1) tree for every fifty (50) feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. A minimum of thirty (30) percent of the trees required will be coniferous. b. Two ( 2) ornamental trees can be substituted for every one (i) over-story deciduous shade tree. In no case shall ornamental trees exceed fifty (50) percent of the required number of trees. c. Parking and driving areas between the building and frontage street shall be screened in the following manner: 1) A continuous mass of plant materials; minimum of three (3) feet in height at time of planting; or 2) A continuous earth bena with slopes no greater than 3:1 and a minimum of three (3) feet in height; or 3) A combination of earth berms and plant materials such that a minimum of three ( 3) feet of continuous screening is achieved. F. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping Standards (1) All parkinq areas containing over one hundred (100) stalls shall include unpaved, landscaped islands that are reasonably distributed throughout the parking area to break up the expanses of paved areas. Landscaped islands shall be provided every two hundred fifty (250) feet or more of uninterrupted parking stalls. 5F (2) AlI landscaped islands sha12 contain a minimum of one hundred eighty (180) square feet with a minimum width of five (5) feet and shall be provided with deciduous shade trees, or ornamental, or evergreen trees, plus ground cover, mulch, and/or shrubbery, in addition to the minimum landscape requirements of this ordinance. Parking area landscaping shall be contained in planting beds bordered by a six (6) inch raised concrete curb. (3) Trees shall be provided at the rate of one tree for each fifteen (15) surface parking spaces provided or a fraction thereof. G. Screening and Buffering Standards (1) Where the parcel abuts park or residentially zoned property, there shall be provided a landscaped buffer which shall be constructed in the following manner: a. A screening fence or wall shall be constructed within a five (5) foot strip along the property line(s) abutting the park or residentially zoned property. Said fence or wall shall be constructed of attractive, permanent finished materials, compatible with those used in the principal structure, and shall be a minimum of six (6) feet high and a maximum of eight (8) feet high. Chain link fences shall have non- wooden slats when used for screening purposes; or b. A pZantinq screen shall be constructed in a fifteen (15) foot strip and shall consist of healthy, fully hardy plant materials and shall be designed to provide a minimum year-round opaqueness of eighty (80) percent at the time of maturity. The plant material shall be of sufficient height to achieve the required screening. Planting screens shall be maintained in a neat and healthful condition. Dead vegetation shall be promptly replaced. c. If the existing topography, natural growth of vegetation, permanent buildings or other barriers meet the standards for screening as approved by the City, they may be substituted for all or part of the screening fence or planting screen. (2) All loading docks must be located in the rear or side yards and be screened with a six (6) foot high minimum solid screening fence if visible from a 5G public right-of-way or if within thirty (30) feet of a residential districts. (3) All external loading and service areas accessory to buildings shall be completely screened from the ground level view from contiguous residential properties and adjacent streets, except at access points. H. Credit for Larqe Trees The total number of required over-story trees may be reduced by one-half (1/2) tree for each new deciduous tree measuring three (3) inches or more in diameter, or each new coniferous tree measurir►q eight (8) feet or more in height. In no event, however, shall the reduction be greater than twenty-f ive ( 25 ) percent of the total number of trees required. , I. Credit for Existing Trees The total number of required new over-story trees may be reduced by the retention of existing over-story trees provided that the followinq conditions are satisfied: (1) Such trees are four ( 4) inches or greater in cal iper measured six (6) inches from soil level. (2) For each existing tree meeting the requirement, two trees as required in section D above may be deleted. (3) Proper precautions to protect trees during development shall be indicated on grading plans submitted for plan review. Such precautions are outlined in section J. These precautions shall be included in the landscape surety. J. Irrigation. Underground irrigation shall be required to maintain all landscaped, boulevard, front and side yard areas. K. Installation. (1) The following standards shall be met when installing the required landscapinq:� a. Plant materials shall be located to provide reasonable access to all utilities. b. All required screening or bufferinq shall be located on the lot occupied by the use, building, facility or structures to be screened. No screening or buffering shall be 5H located on any public right-of-way. c. Sodded areas on slopes shall be staked. d. Seeded areas shall be mulched with straw to prevent erosion. Hydro mulching is acceptable. e. Oak trees shall be surrounded by snow fence or other means at their drip line to prevent compaction of their root systems. f. Plantings shall not be placed so as to obstruct lines of sight at street corners and driveways. g. No plant materials reaching a mature height of twenty (20) feet or more shall be planted within a twenty-five (25) foot lineal path of the centerline of an overhead power line. (2) The applicant shall install all landscape materials within one year; but shall have three (3) years within which to install the required landscaping if the following minimum standards are met: a. First year 1) All grading is completed, including installation of berms. 2) The required irrigation system is installed. 3) Areas to be seeded and/or sodded are installed. 4) Screening for adjacent residential areas is installed, if required. 5) Twenty-five (25) percent of the required over-story trees are installed. 6) Twenty-five (25) percent of the perimeter landscaping is installed. b. Second year 1) The remainder of the perimeter landscaping is installed. 2) Interior landscapinq is installed. 3) Fifty (50) percent of the remaining required over-story trees are installed. 51 c. Third year Any remaininq landscapinq shall be installed. L. Maintenance. (1) The property owner shall be responsible for replacement of any dead trees, shrubs, ground covers, and soddinq. If any plant materials are not maintained or replaced, the property owner shall have, upon written notification from the City, one growing season to replace said materials before the City shall maintain or replace said plant materials and assess the property for the costs thereof. Plant materials need not be replaced specie for specie; however, in no case shall the number of plant materials be reduced from the minimum that is required by this section when replacing dead plant materials. ( 2) Screen fences and walls which are in disrepair shall be repaired. (3) All vacant lots, tracts, or parcels shall be properly maintained in an orderly manner free of litter and junk. ,�: � UTYQ � FRlDLE r FOR CONCIIRRENCE BY THE CITY COIINCIL--COAII�ISSIOIi APPOINTMENT �� ]_:. . I� Y� �� 7 Cl �fford Johnson 51 i 6 iiuqhes Avenue N. E. (HI 572-8214 (R�signed--Effective Oc :ober 1, 1990) �10VB�[SBit 19 � 1990 .�j��=_ 4-1-91 � � - � ORDI�ICB ii0. - 1990 AN ORDIN!►NC$ RECODIFYIIi�i T8B FRIDLEY CITY CODB CHAPTER 113, BZiTITLBD '�SOLID *liBTB DZBPOSAL ]1�TD RECYCLINQ COLLECTION��, BY I►DDII�1a BBCTIONB 113.06 71I1D 113.07, �'80LID 11'ABT$ IIBATB1riEI�11T PROQR�i1rII�lIZTa�� 1lIiD "BOLID w718T8 PROaRAM ggg,� � l�TD ggN�BggING T88 pR8BS�1'P BECTIONB 113 .06 TO 113 . 08 l�1TD 113 . 07 TO 113. 09 � 11ND THE RBI+i1�iI1dINQ B$CTIONB CONSECIITIVBLY; FtJRTH$R A1�IENDINC� CRAPTER 11 OF THB FRIDLEY CITY CODB E�ITITI.BD ��GBNBRPiL PROVI8I0�T8 llldD F$86��, BBCTZON 11.10. The City Council of the City of Fridley hereby ordains as follows: Section 113 06 Solid Waste Abatement Proaram The Citv of Fridlev in order to meet the rectuirements of State Law has established a Solid Waste Abatement Proaram. This procrammina includes the curbside collection o recvc a e. ser inq residential dwellinas of one to fo�?r units the ourchase and distribution of curbside recvcli�}g containers, a droo-off red��mption center for recyclables a vard waste transfer site. and oth��r special abatement activities as authorized bv the Citv Cou: icil. Sec�ion 113.07 Solid Waste Abatement Procxram Fee Eff :ctive J nua � iyy Lne c:�L v� r��u1= �• ay� ---- ----- --- resldential dwellinas of one to four units S2.50 �er unit per g�ua ter The fee shall be charaed in coniunction with the utilitv bil Linqs as administered b_,y the Finance Department. This fee shall be called the Solid Waste Abatement Program Fee This revenue shall be placed in the Solid Waste Abatement Fund and shall be exp�nded on solid waste �roqrammina activities These activities include the curbside collection of recyclables for residential dweLlinas of one to four units the �urchase and distribution of cur�side recycling containers a dro�-off redemption center for rec�clables a vard waste transfer site and other special abatement activities as authorized by the Citv Council. Chapter il. General Provisions and Fees Section 11.10 is amended as follows: 11.10 Fees for Services Rendered Code 113.07 Subiect Solid Waste Proqrammina Fee Fee 52 50 oer residential dwellinc of 1-4 units per auarter 7 7a ORDI!1ANCE NO. - 1990 PAGE 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR ATTF ST : SHI3.LEY A. HAAPALA, CITY CLERK Pub:.ic Hearing: November 19, 1990 Fir: ;t Reading: Sea �nd Reading: Pub . i sh : � � cinroF fRlDLEY PLANNING DIVISION MEMOR,ANDUM DATI;: November 15, 1990 (�y• � ;. TO: William Burns, City Manager � FR01 [ : SUB� fECT: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant First Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying Section 205 "Zoning" as Pertaining to Landscaping Att3ched is the ordinance recodifying the zoning code, Section 205 of :he City Code, as it pertains to landscape requirements. Staff rec�mmends that the City Council approve the first reading of the att�ched ordinance. 1�Il�I/ 3n M-9 0-822 '� : ' ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYIN(i T8E FRIDLBY CITY CODE, CHAPTBR 205, ENTITLED ��ZONINQ�� BY l�MENDINQ SECTIONS 205.09.06, 205.13.06, 205.14.06, 205.15.06� 205.16.06, 205.17.06, 205.18.06� DELETIN(� SECTIONB 205.13.OS.D.(8j� 205.13.07.D.(1), (2), (3), (4).(C), (5), (6), 205.13.07.F, 205.14.05.D.(8), 205.15.07.D.(1)� (2)� (3)� (4).(C), (5), (6), 205.14.07.F� 205.15.05.D.(8)� 205.15.07.D.(1), (2)� (3)� (4�.(C), (5), (6), 205.15.07.F, 205.16.OS.D.(8), 205.16.07.D.(1), (2), (3), (4).(c), (5), (6)� 205.16.07.F� 205.17.05.D.(8)� 205.17.07.D.(1)� (2i� (3)� i4l•icir i5)� i6)� 205.17.07.F, 205.18.OS.D.(8), 205.18.07.D.(1), (2), (3), (4).(C)� (5)� (6), 205.18.07.F AND RENIIMBBRING CONSECIITIVE SECTIONS Tte City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as fc llows: 2(5.09 R-3 General Multiple Family District Regulations 6. Landscape Requirements • �: -__ —p�r��r j. • � • v�i �i:a�eza3 �_�_�� .aaia a. �7TGr i a—�tiT-919ei4—e'37�+sa'ia eaf �sr•- —=i•• L r r . . a j u i .. �E�CCC�TGT�.Tr�^'rTT9C� L`�'�'i�—i3i1P� ��' ..a iL��' � � • � _ . . .. - - � a--�PC�r' � e��i6� 7notn-� i._ 2 L t — i r, a• s�cZ aGTiVtyT 6. LANDSCAPE REOUIREMENTS A. Scope. All o en areas o an site exce for areas used f r - - --•- � -- -- - • i.�.i_ .� Existina developments shall comply with the recruirements of this secti9n if one or more of the followina applies: � At the time of a build�nq expansion or alteration which dictates the necessitv for additional parkinq or hardsurface areas in excess of four (4) stalls. � �n excess of four (4) stalls. c. Construction of additional loadinct docks. d Construction of new garkinq areas in excess of four (4) stalls. � If full compliance cannot be achieved due to site constraints oartial compliance as determined bv the City shall be enforced. � The requirements of this section shall not be required for building alterations which do not affect the exterior portions of the site. B. Bonding Requirement zoninq code for one qrowing season after the installation of landscape materials is comnleted C. Plan Submission and Ap�roval. �_ C•] -i not associated with a building vroiect. � The following items shall appear on the landscaDe lP an: a. General 11 Name and addres�s of ownerjdeveloper 21 Name and address of architect/desianer �, Date of �lan �reparation 4j, Dates and description of al� revisions 51 Name of project or development 8C - . . .� -�• �- �• _ - •� �.. ��. - �. � � � -.�_. - � -- � N rth �oint �ndication b. Landscape Data � Plantinq schedul� (table co tainina: al Svmbols � ouantiti�es � Common names � Botanical names 1 Sizes of plant material at time of p anting � Root specification (B.R.. B & B. potted, etc.) g,Z Special nlantinq instructions ?1 3,1 Plantina detail (show all species to scale � --- - --a � areas benas and other similar features. � Tvpical sections of landscape islands and planter beds with identification of materials used. 61 Details of plantinq beds and foundation plantings. 71, Note indicating how disturbed soil areas ��11 be restored �hrouqh the use o� soddinq seedinq, or other technicru�s. � feet and slo�e 'nformation. � Coverace plan for underqrou d irricration system, if anv. : � ]� Statement or svmbols. to describe exterior liqhtina plan concept. c. 3pecial Conditions: D. Landscapinc� Mater'als; Definitions. Al1 plant materia�s shall be livina plants Artificial plants are prohib�ted. � Grass and around cover. a. months after plantina witn proper erv5sv�� ontro d rin lan esta ishmen eri - - - � • -•- - , - --- - - maintained free of foreiqn and noxious materials. � Acce�ted ground covers are sodc seed, or othe� - - -- - -- - -'- - _ � ti. � �a. bv edaina. � Trees. a. Over-storv Deciduous. � L----'- un branched for several feet above the qround havina a defined crown whicY� looses leaves annuallv. ,21 Such trees shall have a 2 1/2 inc ca i�er minimum at �lantinct. b. Ornamental. � single trunk un-branched for several feet above the around havina a defined �row� 8E which looses leaves annuallv. � c. Coniferous. 11 A woodv plant which a maturity is at least thi�tv (30) feet or more in heiaht - - -- • ----L_� �_ �ti... portion of the branches vear-round. 21 Such �rees shall be six l6) feet in heiai�t at plantinq. � Shrubs. a. Deciduous or evercrreen Qlant material, wh' at maturitv is fi�teen (15) feet in �eiaht or . _ .- - ----� o_.,. +.ti,e plantinQ: � Dwarf decidu us shrubs �hall be eiahteen L18) inches tall. . ?� Deciduous shrubs shall be twentv-four (24) inches tall except as in Section D below. � � Vines. Vines shall be at least twelve (12) inches h�cth at plantina and are aenerally used in coniunction with walls or fences. � Slopes and Berms. a. b. Earth berm screenincr oarkina lots and other o en a eas s a no h ve s o s c d • A minimum three (3) foot berm is rectuired. E. Perimeter LandscaDinQ: Standards. � minimum standards applv: a. � thirty l30) Dercent of the trees requirecx witt be coniferous. b. Two �2) ornamental trees can be substituted for every one (�) over-story deciduous shade tree. In no case shall ornamental trees exceed fiftv S50) �ercent of the required number of trees. c. Parkina and driving areas between the buildina and frontaqe street shal7� be screened in the followinct manner: � time of �lantinc: or � A continuous earth berm with slopes no � A combination of earth berms and plant F. Interior Parking Lot L�ndscapina Standards Li [�� 11 that are reasonabl,y distributed throuahout the parking area to break up the expanses of uaved areas. Landscaped islands shall be provided everv two hundred fifty (250L feet or more of uninterru�ted Qarking stalls. width of five (5 L feet and shall be provided with deciduous shade trees or ornamental or evercrreen be contained in �lantinq beds bordered bv a six cb� inch raised concrete curb. or a fraction thereof. C�1�J G. Screeninq and Bufferina Standards � Where the parcel abuts gark or residentiallv zoned - - - - - - �----� 1? �. manner: a. � zoned property. Said fence or wall sha11 be constructed of attractive oermanent finished wooden slats when used for screenina purnoses; � c. Tf the existina topogra�hv natural arowth of veqetation permanent buildings or other barriers meet the standards for screenina as �nroved by the Citv they mav be substituted for all or �art of the screeninq fence or plantinq screen. public riqht-of-way or i within thirtv c3v� teez of a residential districts. u All external loadina and service areas accessorv to - - - ��- H. Credit for LarQe Trees The total number of required over-story trees mav be reduced by one-half (1/2l tree for each new deciduous tree measurinct three (3) inches or more in diameter. or 8H of trees required. I. Credit for Existinq Trees � Such trees are four (4) inches or qreater in cali�er measured six (61 inches from soil level� � For each existin,g tree meetinq the reauirement two trees as required in section D above may be deleted. i� submitted for plan review. Such Drecautions are J. Irrigation. K. Installation. ]� The following standards shall be met when installinct the required landsca�inqi a. Plant materials shall be located to provide reasonable access to all utilities. b. All reauired screening or bufferincr shall be c. d. Sodded areas on slopes shall be staked. e. Oak trees shall be surrounded by snow fence or other means at their drip line to prevent compaction of their root systems. � Plantincs shall not be placed so as to obstruct � ines of sic�ht at street corners and driveways. 81 g.i No Qlant materials reachinc,� a mature height of � The applicant shall install all landscape materials within one year; but shall have three (3� years within which to install the reauired landscapinq if the following minimum standards are met: � First year � All �rading is completed, including installation of berms. � The reguired irrigation system is installed. 3,1 Areas to be seeded and/ar sodded are installed. 4,1 Screeninq for adiacent residential areas is installed, if reauired. 5,L Twenty-five l25) percent of the reciuired over-storv trees are installed. 61, Twenty-five (251 gercent of the perimeter landscaping is installed. b. Second vear ]�., The remainder of the gerimeter landscaping is installed. �,1, Interior landscapinq is installed. 31, Fifty (50) percent of the remaininq required over-storv trees are installed. c. �hird year Any remaininq landscaging shall be installed. L. Maintenance. ,L1,1 The property owner shall be responsible for replacement of anv dead trees, shrubs, ctround covers. and sodding. If any plant materials are not City shall maintain or reglace said plant materials and assess the property for the costs thereof. SJ S�L Plant materia�s need not be reDlaced s�ecie for Screen fences and walls which are in disrepair shall be reoaired. u All vacant lots tracts or ,.,parcels shall be properlY maintained in an orderlv manner free of litter and junk. The following shall apply to Sections 205.13, 205.14, 205.15, 205.16, 205.17, 205.18. 5. Parking Requirements D. Design Requirements L. 1 1 L L i� .��.. 1 � .� � � �sa�. �'�'e'�9TTRSS�DP."�'.g��'C s�w.�vwjrv j+•i • �-} � Parkinq lots with more than four ( 4) parking stalls shall be striped. {��-} � Sufficient concrete areas may be required for motorcycle parkinq in addition to the required vehicle parking stalls. {�-� f10j. Bike racks may be required by the City in an area that is convenient to each major building entrance and will not disrupt pedestrian or vehicular traffic or fire lanes. {�} 11 Safety signs, devices may be required pedestrian safety. 6. LANDSCAPE REQIIIREMENTS markings and traffic control , to promote vehicular and a a, � e _c �� L e _� o.� '{,,."��+GF.TL iva �Li17C1Tl7I �.a++�"'^`�Z � �i�G�l�'7� �L.�1 7 L.�. 7 �.�..i.�..v � ... �. ' L- ,..s._ - �r��i:�=��=*:�_ris�f'.—�- - _ - - - - - - - , - = a ' : a�. ..��.._....� t __ � � . 6. LANDSCAPE RE4UIREMENTS A. Scope. �'•11 Ail open areas of any site exceQt for areas used for - - - ---, u All new developments reuuirina a building �ermit shall complY with the reauirements of this section. j2� Existina develonments shall complv with the requirements of this section if one or more of the followinq a�plies: .L31 u a. excess of four (4) stalls. b. Buildinq alterations which dictate a chanae in use such that the parking area must be ext�anded in excess of four {4) stalls. c. Construction of additional loadinq docks. d. Construction of new parkinq areas in excess of four (4) stalls. City shall be enforced. affect the exterior portions of the site. B. Bondinq Requirement of landscape materials is comnleted. C. Plan Submission and An�roval. .c.�.i or D��or to a��roval of outside improvements not 8L not associated with a building project. L2,� The following items shall ap�ear on the landsca�e lan: � General 11 Name and address of owner/developer ?.1. � 1 ?1 61 ?1 Name and address of architect/designer Date of Dlan pre.paration Dates and description of all revisions Name of pro,j ect or development Scale of plan (engineerinq scale onlv� at no smaller than 1 inch ecLuals 50 feet North point indication b. Landscape Data 11 Planting schedule ltable) containing: � 1 ai bL � aL � S o s 4uantities Common names Botanical names Sizes of plant material at time of plantinQ fl Root specification IB.R.. B& B, potted, etc.) g,l SDecial �lantinq instructions Existinq tree and shrubbe�v, locations, common names and apDroximate siz� Plantinq detail (show all species to scale at normal mature crown diameter, or spread for local hardiness zone) � TvDical sections in detail of fences, tie walls. planter boxes, tot lots, uicnic areas. berms, and other similar features. 51 Tvnical sections of landscape islands and planter beds with identification of 8M materials used. 6Z, Details of plantinq beds and foundation plantinqs. 7j., Note indicatina how disturbed soil areas will be restored through the use of sodding, seedina, or other techniques. � 21. Coverage plan for underaround irr�aation system, if any. 10 Statement or symbols, to describe exterior liahting �lan concept. c. Soecial Conditions: Where landscape or man-made materials are used D. Landscapinq Materials; Definitions, All plant materials shall be livinc,� �lants. Artificial plants are prohibited. � Grass and qround cover. a. G�ound cover shall be planted in such a manner as to gresent a finished apnearance and reasonablY complete coveracte within twelve (12 � Exce.ption to this is undisturbed areas containina natural vegetation which can be maintained free of foreian and noxious materials. b= Accented qround covers are sod seed or other orcranic material The use of rock and bark mulch shall be limited to areas around other veQetation (i e shrubsL and shall be contained by edqing. �2,1 Trees . a. Over-storv Deciduous. � C•11J trunk un-branched for several feet above the around havina a defined crown which looses leaves annuallv. 21. Such trees shall have a 2 1/2 inch caliper minimum at plantina. b. Ornamental. � A wood� than tl 2,,. Such t� minimw c. Coniferous. 11 A wooc with a single trunk fullv branched to the ground having foliaae on the outermost portion of the branches year-round. 2l Such trees shall be six (6) feet in heiaht at plantinq. j31 Shrubs. a. less. Such materials may be used.for the planting: 1�, p�;Qii �G�i��•� �'�*'��bs shall be eiahteen �18) inches tall. 21 Deciduous shrubs shall be twentv-four (24) inches tall ex�e�t as in Section D below. � � Vines. Vines shall be at least twelve (12� inches hiah at planting, and are c�enerally used in coniunction with walls or fences. � Slopes and Berms. a. b. Earth berm screeninct parking lots and other open areas shall not have slopes exceedina 3:1. A minimum three l3) foot bena is rectuired. E. Perimeter Landscap�nct: Standards. � In order to achieve landsca�incx which is a��ro�riate in scale with the size of a buildina and site the minimum standards anvlv: a. perimeter whichever is areater A minimum vl thirty (30) percent of the trees recruired will be coniferous. : • b. Two ( 2) ornamental trees can be substituted for everv one (il over-story deciduous shade tree. In no case shall ornamental trees exceed fiftv s50) percent of the reauired nwaber of trees. c. Parkina and drivinq areas between the buildina and frontage street shall be screened in the following manner: 11, A continuous mass of plant materials� minimum of three l3� feet in heiaht at time of planting: or ?1 31 A continuous earth berm with slopes no grpater than 3•1 and a minimum of three (3) feet in height; or F. Interior Parking Lot Landscaping Standards � All parkina areas containinct over one hundred (100) stalls shall include unpaved landscaned islands that are reasonably distributed throuQhout the parkina area to break up the exnanses of paved areas. Landscaoed islands shall be provided everv two hundred fiftv (250) feet or more of � uninterrupted parkina stalls. � All landscaped islands shall contain a minimum of one hundred eiqhty (180) scruare feet with a minimum width of five (5l feet and shall be provided with deciduous shade trees or ornamental or everareen 1.3 L inch raised concrete curb. or a fraction thereof. G. Screeninq and Bufferinq Standards � Where the parcel abuts oark or residentiallv zoned - - ----� manner: a. b. c. zoned pro,�erty. Said fence or wa11 snatt �e construct�d of attractive �ermanent finished wooden slats when used for screenina puraoses: � screeninq. Plantinc screens shal� be maintained in a neat and healthful condition. Dead veQetation shall be,�romptiv replaced. a�proved by the City they may be substitutect for all or oart of the screening fence or plantincL screen. ,�, All loadinq docks must be located in the rear or s3.i_ : � properties and adj acent streets excevz az ac�C�� points. H. Credit for Larqe Trees I. The total number of reauired over-storv trees mav be - - -� - --- �--_ �.._.... Credit fo Existina Trees provided that the followinq conditions are satisfied: � Such trees are four ( 4) inches or areater in cal iper measured six (6) inches from soil level. j21 For each existina tree meeting the reauirement two trees as recruired in section D above may be deleted. � Proper precautions to protect trees durinc development shall be indicated on aradina olans included in the landscape suretv. J. Irrigation. K. Installation. i �.l � b. All reguired screeninq or bufferinc shall be located on the lot occupied bv the use. �. d. e. f. � � 1_a! building facility or structures to be 7 1 L Sodded areas on slopes shall be staked. compaction of their root svstems. Plantings shall not be �laced so as to obstruct lines of siqht at street corners and drivewavs. No plant materials reaching a mature heiaht of twenty (20) feet or more_ shall be planted ' ' _ -' _ __ _ - �f ��LL �C � The apnlicant shall install_all landsca�e materials - - ---- in♦ . the followinQ minimum standards are met: a. First vear � ?1 31 41 � � All qradina is completed includina installation of berms. The required irriaation svstem is installed. Areas to be seeded andfor sodded are installed. Twenty-five (25) percent of the recruired over-story trees are installed. Twentv-five L25) percent of the oerimeter landscapinc is installed. b. Second year � � 31 The remainder of the perimeter landscavina is installed. Interior landscaoinq is installed. FiftY (50) percent of the remainina 8S required over-storv trees are installed. c. Third year Any remaininq landscapina shall be installed. L. Maintenance. �, The property owner shall be responsible for growing season to replace said materials before the City shall maintain or renlace said plant materials and assess the pro�ert.y for the costs thereof. Plant materials need not be reolaced specie for s�ecie; however in no case shall the number of materials. j� Screen fences and walls which are in disre�air shall be repaired. � litter and iunk. 7. Performance Standards D. Screening �C �l 2v C.. ..71 �L /� \ [�� L...1 7 �� ia.� LGSaVG v�! T�r'-s�si�F--F6�}-€@e��eJ�3rl--t-�ie--S-rE�� arr -�€eii!—�'�}—€e , � 1. 1 7 +. i � L ' Li �� z-tcccf� � r� ��cc` va c�aaa .7iTE:GLTS�17�eC 1 � t�l �i j 7 �.� L.. �' . �� S�RCi'C�TSe2'tZP'C'fSSfTl' .��eT r''T'�•�•�•�—ZTI� �l r / � •�.i / n\ r7 ...�1 S.�� 1 .. 7 1 �--: �1 P al a'�e"'g� e' /�f \ eT11. �.4 1. 7 1 L l' i' ' 1... il_� � T / ' � � aii4lViiV ' f Qg�e� � ---- --- � c --- — c , -- i. �+ — --�`i� cavvvs.��.a.a�� '�Q�li�r_lCZ'C...� �7 t�.��i .�`�l 1 L� ..iL.�w...J.2.'� �.�A 8T . . , , p___: _ _ee�-��re--�� . � �e�-�-�-�—er--}�a�r�-e�-��P—s�r��e�--€eRe=-� _,__�: r_^-'__ � -=-_---' {#} � Screening of off-street parking shall be required for: s�ree�ee��re��e-s�eP} '--• � ::_�-- ^'l `�7 � / �3�'Gi:@S 7 A-�-'a�� , �93�-liiE}--�9��E8-iRii9�-b�-�'6v-s'r�'Rr'�-i�z'rir�"r�r2ai -v"r #►-i-�ri�se�t�--s��ee�ri�g--€e�teP--i#�i s��€�e�e �-t�-ef i��i��' �s } e�e��i-a-�-e��t�-te�s r �eg-i E�ea�i�—�i-s�-te�; t�ieiz= `- -�sus��-ar - � : r.... �'�'�' {�} ,u Where any commercial district is adjacent to a public right-of-way or across from any residential district, the followinq requirements must be met: f8} ,u All trash or garbage storage receptacles must be located in the rear or side yard and be totally screened from view from any public right-of-way. Provisions must be taken to protect screening from vehicle damage. f9�} � All raw materials, supplies, finished or semi-finished products and equipment, not including motor vehicles, shall be stored within an enclosed building or be screened on all sides from view from a public right-of-way or an adjoininq property by a fence or other approved screen which extends two (2) feet above the highest item to be stored with the height of the fence not to exceed eight (8) feet. -(-3�� j51 Motor vehicles necessary to the operation of the principal use may be stored without screening only within the permitted rear yard area, if they are not readily 8U visible from a public right-of-way. -f�}} .L61 All roof equipment, except alternate energy devices, must be screened from public view unless the equipment is designed as an integral part of the building and is compatible with the lines of the building, as determined by the City. . �ii �e� � tRrsrl � � �--9-1"e9�lei'l9�19 L i z ...�� e - L� _ � _ L _ , r V V l 1�,�"=�� G- F. Maintenance. i�:- G. Essential Services. Pi.SSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS _ DAY OF , 1990. A7 TEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Pu�lic Hearing: Fi rst Reading: Se �ond Reading: Pu �lish: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR � � F TMD�Y �►�_ TOs ntox: •DBJECT CC�1I�LMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORRNDUM November 15, 1990 Nilliam Burne, City Manager � � �� Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Derrel Clark, Chfef Buildinq Official 1lmendments to Chapter 206 (Buildfng Code) Plcase find sttached a proposed ozdinance which updates/amends portion: of Chapter 206, "Buildinq Code". 1ldvance copies were distrfbited to you on November 9, 1990. It will, when approved, adopt a.l the latest �andatory State and Kodel Codes as well as an updated fee schedulc. This Code section is routinely amended every three y� :ars to correspond to the three year amendment cycle for the State a�d National Codes. The ie�; schedule for buildinq permits will remain the same. However, the i�es are based on estimated construction costs and constru:tion costs which inczease each yeaz. Therefore, the actual fees collected do increase proportionately. The plunbing fee schedule has been increased and wi12 be equal to the fee: collected in Blaine. The plumbinq tees for other cuburbs in this area are sliqht2y Aigher. The onl Y new fee is tbe one we will co2lect for installation of sobile �omes in sobile home parks. The 530.00 f�e will cover our inspectLon of the blockfng syatem, tie-dovns, and utility hook-ups. The electrical connections vill continue to require a separate permit snd inapection. Mobile home park owners will be notified of this amenclment. The de2eted portions are enclosed in slash marks, //de2ete//, and the new or revised portions are underlfned, new or revised wordina. JR,/DC:l a 7lttacha ent : M-90-8s' 7 Chapter 206 Propoted Ordinance � ORDI�CB �i0. . � !1N ORDZ�CE RECODIFYINQ THg lRIDL$Y CITY CODg, CHlIPTBR Z06 E�1'PITLED ��BIIILDINa CODB��, BY �NDING 88CTIO1�I8 206.01.02, Z06.01.03, 206.01.04, Z06.01.05, 206.03.02 ]11dD Z06.05 The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follow �: 206.01� BIIILDIN(; CODE 1. Tl,e Minnesota State Buildinq Code, established pursuant to Minnes�ta Statutes 16B.59 through 16B.73, one copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of Fridley, Minnesota, is hereby adopted by reference as the Building Code of the City of Fridlei and incorporated in this Chapter as completely as if set out he�e in full. (Ref. 901) //2. "he 1987 Edition of the State Buildinq Code effective January 14, 1935, adopts by reference the followinq codes: (Ref. 901) A, 1985 Edition of the Uniform Buildinq Code, identified as " JBC" . B, 1987 Edition of the National Electrical Code, fdentified a � "NEC" . C, American National Standard Safety Code for Elevators, Dimbwaiters, Escalators and Moving Walks, identified as ANSI A17.1 - 1984 and Supplement, ANSI A17.1a - 1985. D, 1987 Minnesota Plumbinq Code, identified as Minnesota Riles Chapter 4715. E, Flood Proofinq Requlations, June 1972, Office of Chief of Eigineer, U.S. Army. F, Minnesota Heating, Ventilatinq, Air Conditioning and R>_friqeration Code, identified as Minnesota Rules Chapter 1345 (Tuly 31, 1983). G. Minnesota Energy Code - Minnesota Rules Chapter 4215, 1983 C'�BO Model Enerqy Code adopted by reference with State a nendments . H, Minnesota Manufactured Home Rules, (Code & Licensing) July 3l, 1983, Minnesota. I. Standards of Performance for Solar Enerqy Systems MLnnesota Rules Chapter 1325.// //3. �ppendices. In acdition to the above, certain l�ippendices, �Standards and Suppl+:mental material refersnced in the State Building Code are bereb• � adopted by reference as part of the Building Code of the City ��f Fridley and incorporated into this Chapter as completely as ff set out in iull, includinq but not limited to the iollowinq: 2. ;►. Technical Requirements for Fallout Shelters, identified �is Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1330. (Ref. 901) Is. Variation of Snow Loads, identified as Minnesota State liuildinq Code, Chapter 1365. �;. 1985 Uniform Building Code, IIBC Appendix Chapter 35, .dentified as Sound Tranemission Control. 1�. Minnesota Plumbing Code, Chapter 1355.// "he followina chanters of the Code are adooted bv the citv: ,►. �hapter 1300 - Code Administration ;�. Chacter 1301 Certification and Continuina Education of ;�uilding Officials �;_ �haDter 1302 Buildina Construction and State Aaencv �•onstruction Rules :io lonQer found in SBC Rule 13av. � � j1,Z Reguired Provisions -UBC Appendix Cha�ter 35 Sound Transmission Control. Chapter 1315 - Electrical Code Chapter 1325 - Solar En�rav svstems �;_ Chapter 1330 Technical Reauirements for fallout � ►helters :[. Chauter 1335 - Floodproof�na Reaulations Chapter 1340 Facilities for the Handicapped ,r_ Chapter 1346 Minnesota U iform Mechanical code 1990 ; ;clition ., ,L : �_ ]� �hapt�r 1350 Manufactured Home Rules Chapter 1355 Plumbina Code -Administrative rule 4715 Chaoter 1360 - Prefabricated Structures • � �� f_ hC,�-pt�r 1365 - Variation of Snow Loads �>. - ter 1370 Model Enerav Code - Administrative Rule �'670 ;/j4. �►ptional Appendices. The f<�llowing Appendices, Standarde and Supplemental materfals are not a mandatory part of the Minnasota State Building Code but are adopt�:d by reference for the City of Frfdley and are incorporated into i:his Chapter ae completely as if set out fn lull: (Ref. 901) ;�. Minnesota State Buflding Code Appendix "C". Abbreviations a�nd Addresses of Technical Organizations. l�. 1985 UBC �ppendix Chapters 1, 7, 38, 55 and 70. ��. Minnesota Plumbing Code, 4715.3500 to 4?15.3800. 1►. Chapter 1335 Flood Proofing Requlations, Parts 1335.0600 i.o 1335.1200, and FPR Sections 205.4 to 208.2.// 3. ],dministration Ovtional Ap��ndices. ;'he followina chapters of the code are adopted without chan4e bv the : City: �_ �haQter 1305.0150 Subnart 2. UBC Appendix Cha�ters 1 12 Division 1 25 38 55, and � ]��_ �haD�er 1335 Flooc�p,�r�ofina Reaulations Parts 1335.0200 10 1335.3�.00 and FPR Sections 200.2 to 1405.3 //5. Organization and Enforcement. 2.. The Code Enforcement Division shall be the Building Code I�epartment of the City of Fridley. The Administrative 2,uthority shall be a State Certified "Buildinq Official". I,. The orqanization of the Building Code Department and e.nforcement of the Code shall be as established by Chapter 2 t�f the Uniform Buildinq Code 1985 Edition. The Code �hall be enforced within the incorporated limits of the City and �xtraterritorial limits permitted by Minnesota Statutes, 1985. �Ref. 901)j/ 4. (rQanization and Enforcement. �._ The oraanization of the Buildina Division and enforcement . � � �f the code shall be as establis�_�d_byCha�ter 2 of the Uni�orm •- -•- • -- --�- -L_„ L.. ..«�...,•..e.i m��h�n , --- -- - ��he incornorated limits of the citv_ and e. ,imits permitted by Minnesota Statutes, 1984. 3. The Buildina Insvection Division shall be the Buildina 'ode D�artment of the Ci�y ofFridley The Administrative �uthority shall be a State Certified Buildina Official. :. The City Manager shall be the Appointinq Authority and iesignate the Building Official for the jurisdiction of ?ridley. 206.Ot. CONFLICTB In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Code adoptad by the provisions of this Chapter and applicable provisions of St3te law, rules or requlations, the latter shall prevail. 206.03. PERMIT FEES 1. The issuance of permits, conduction of inspections and colle ction of fees shall be as provided for in Chapter 3 of the 1988 7niform Building Code. Section 304, paragraph (c), is amended to read "...except on occupancy groups R-3 and M-1". (Ref. 901) 2. 7he fee schedules shall be as follows: A. Plan Revi•w Fees. (1) When a plan or other data are submitted for review, a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications for review. ( 2) Where plans are incorporated or changed so as to require additional plan review an additional plan review fee shall be charged. (3) Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation and plans and other data submitted for review may thereafter be returned or destroyed. the building official may extend the time for action by the applicant once for a period not exceeding 180 days upon request by the applicant. ( 4) The plan review fee shall be 65 percent ( 65$ ) of the building permit fee and shall be credited to the building permit plan check fee if a permit is obtained within 180 days followinq the completion date of plan review. (Ref. 9oi� 8. Buildinq Permit Fees. (Rsi.. 901) 9E TOTAL Vl1LII71TIOl�i $ 1.00 to $ 500.00 ..............$15.00 F8E $ 501.00 to $2,000.00 ..............$15.00 for the first $5)0.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $100.00 or fraction th:reof, to and including $2,000.00 $ 2,001.00 to $25,000.00 .............$45.00 for the first $2,000.0o plus $9.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction tiereof, to and including $25,000.00 $:5,001.00 to $50,000.00 .............$252.00 for the first $: 5, 000. 00 plus $6. 50 for each additional $1, 000. 00 or fraction tiereof, to and including $50,000.00 $!0,001.00 to $100,000.00............$414.50 for the first $! �0, 000. 00 plus $4 . 50 for each additional $1, 000. 00 or fraction tl�ereof, to and including $100,000.00 $.00,001.00 to $500,000.00...........$639.50 for the first $.00,000.00 plus $3.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or f-action thereof, to and including $500,000.00 $i00,001.00 to $1,000,000.00........$2039.50 for the first $i00,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up .................$3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Cther Inspactions and Fees: Inspections outside of normal business hours....$30.00 per Your* (minimum charge - two hours) �.einspection fees assessed under provisions of UBC Section :05ig) .....................................//$15.00// $30.00 � �er hour* ::nspections for which no fee is specifically :.ndicated ..................................//$20.00// 3b. 0 � �er hour* (minimum charge - one-half hour) ,►dditional plan review required by changes, additions or :�evisions to approved plans ................//520.00// 30.00 �er hour* (minimum charge - one-half hour) �esidential Mobile Home Installation . .....S30.00 +�Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, C. D. e�uipment, hourly waqes and fringe benefits of the employees i ivolved. l�lumbinq Psrmit Foos. (Rof. 9oi) F8$ M�nimum Fee ..................................$ 15.00 E�ch Fixture .................................$ // 5.00// 7.00 /�Opening Future Fixture .......................$ 3.50 // Old Opening, New Fixture .....................$ /f 1.50/f 4.00 B�er Dispenser ...............................$ // 4.00// 5.00 BLow Off Basin ...............................$ // 5.00// 7.00 C�tch Basin ..................................$ // 5.00// 7.00 Riin Water Leader ............................$ / 5.00// 7.00 /�Hydraulic Valve ............................./$ 5.00// Simp or Receiving Tank .......................$ // 5.00// ?.00 W�ter Treating Appliance .. ... ..............$ // 7.00// 10.00 /�Hot// Water Heater-Electric ......... ..................$ /�s.00// �.00 Witer Heater-Gas. . . . . . . . . . . . 10.00 OCHER.... .................................1$ of value of �� fixture or appliance O:ber Inspections and Fees: Zzspections outside of normal business hours....$30.00 per h�ur* (minimum charge - two hours) Rainspection fees assessed under provisions of UBC Section 3)5�9) .....................................//$15.00// 30.00 p ar hour* Ilspections for which no fee is specifically ildicated...... . ..........//$20.00// 30.00 ........... ...... p :r hour* (minimum charge - one-half hour) Aiditional plan review required by changes, additions or ravisions to approved plans ................//$20.Q0// 30.00 p :r hour* (minimum charge - one-half hour) *)r the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is tie greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, e�uipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees i zvolved. ltechanical Permit Fees. (Ref. 901) F8E (l) Residential Minimum Fee ..............................$ 15.00 Furnace ..................................$ 20.00 9F 9G Gas Range ................................$ 10.00 Gas Dryer ................................$ 10.00 Gas Piping ...............................$ 10.00 Air Conditioning .........................$ 10.00 OTHER...... .............................1$ of value � of appliance (2j Commercial Minimwn Fee ..............................$ 15.00 AllWork ........:.......................1$ of value of appliance C ther Inspectioas ana Fsas: Inspections outside of normal business hours....$30.00 per Y:our* (minimum charge - two hours) Feinspection fees assessed under provisions of UBC Section '-U5�9) .....................................//$15.00// 30.00 F er hour* Inspections for which no fee is sgecifically �ndicated.......... . //$20.00// 30.0 .......... ............. � er hour* (minimum charge - one-half hour) �dditional plan review required by changes, additions or Yevisions to approved plans ................j/$20.00/j 30.00 F er hour* (minimum charge - one-half hour) �Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, cverhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. E. �lectrical Permit Foes. I1) Payment of Fees �11 electrical inspection fees are due and payable to the City cf Fridley at or before commencement of the installation and :hall be forwarded with the request for inspection. 12) Fee Schedule iees shall be paid according to the following schedule: (a) Minimum fee for each separate inspection of an installation, replacement, alteration or repair limited to one (1) inspection only....$15.00. Minimum fee for installations requiring two inspections shall be....$30.00. (Ref. 901) (b) Services, changes of services, temporary services, additions, alterations or repairs on either primary or 9H secondary services shall be computed separately. 0 to and including 200 ampere capacity....$15.00. For each additional 100 ampere capacity or fraction thereof ...................................$ 5.00. (c) Circuits, installations, additions, alterations or repairs of each circuit or subfeeder shall be computed separately including circuits fed from subfeeders and including the equipment served, except as provided for in (a) through (i). 0 to and includinq //30// � ampere capacity.....//S 4.00.// 5.00 //(Maximum number of 0 to 30 ampere circuits to be paid on is 30 in any one cabinet.)// //31 to and including 100 ampere capacity...$ 6.00.// For each additional 100 ampere capacity or fraction thereof ...................................$ 3.00. ((1)) Maximum fee on a single family dwelling shall not exceed $60.00 if not over 200 ampere capacity. This includes service, feeders, circuits, fixtures and equipment. This maximum fee includes not more than four (4) inspections. (Ref. 901) ((2)) Maximum fee on an apartment building shall not exceed $30.00 per dwelling unit for the first 20 units and $25.00 per dwelling unit for the balance of units. The fee for the service and feeders in an apartment building shall be in accordance with 2b and 2c of the schedule, and shall be added to the fee for circuits in individual apartments. The maximum fee for an apartment applies only to the circuits in the apartment. A two-family unit (dup2ex) maximum fee per unit as per single family dwelling. (Ref. 901) ((3)) The maximum number of 0 to //30// �00 ampere circuits to be paid on any one athletic field lighting standard is ten (10). (Ref. 901) ((4 )) The fee for mobile homes shall be in accordance with 2b and 2c of the fee schedule. (Ref. 901) ((5)) In addition to the above fees: ((a)) A charge of $1.00 will be made for each lighting standard. ((b)) A charge of $2.00 will be made for each 91 traffic siqnal standard. Circuits originating within the standard will not be used when computing the fee. ((6)) In addition to the above fees, all transformers and qenerators for light, heat and power shall be computed separately at //$4.00// 5 0 per unit plus //$.20// 3. o per //RVA// 1o,Kilovolt am�eres or fraction thereof // up to and including 100 RVA. 101 1�VA and over at $.10 per RVA //. The maximum fee for any transformer or qenerator in this category is $40.00. (Ref. 901) ((7)) In addition to the above fees, all transformers for siqns and outline liqhtinq shall be computed at //$3.00 for the first 500 VA or fraction thereof per unit, plus $.40 for each additional 100 VA or fraction thereof// 55.00 ner unit .(Ref. 901) ((8)) In addition to the above fees (unless included in the maximum fee filed by the initial installer) remote control, siqnal circuits and circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at //$3.00// 5.00 per each ten (l0) openings or devices of each system plus //$1.00// 2. 0 for each additional ten (10) or fraction thereof. (Ref. 901) (d) For the review of plans and specifications of proposed installations, there shall be a minimum fee of $100.00, up to and including $30,000 of electrical estimate, plus 1/10 of 1� of any amount in excess of $30,000 to be paid by persons or firms requesting the review. (e) When reinspection is necessary to determine whether unsafe conditions have been corrected and such conditions are not subject to an appeal pending before the Board or any court, a reinspection fee of $15.00, may be assessed in writing by the inspector. (Ref. 901) (f) For inspections not covered herein, or for requested special inspections or services, the fee shall be //$20.00/j 25. 0 per hour, including travel time, plus $.25 per mile traveled, plus the reasonable cost of equipment or material consumed. This Section is also applicable to inspection of empty conduits and such other jobs as determined by the City. (Rei. 901) (g) For inspection of transient projects including but not limited to carnivals and circuses, the inspection fees shall be computed as follows: (Ref. 901) ((1)} Power supply units, according to 28 of the schedule. A like fee will be required on power supply units at each engagement during the season, except 9J that a fee of ,/ $20.00// �.4 per hour will be charqed for addit�onal time spent by the inspector, if the power supply is not ready for inspection at the time and date specified on the request for inspection as required by law. (Ref. 901) ((2)) Rides, devices, or concessions, Bhall be inspected at their first appearance of the eeason and the inspection fee shall be //$10.00// S15.00 per unit. Tn add�tion to the fee for the oower supplv L make apvl�cation for ins�ection a m�n��« �� j� �-�:� be ore its engaaement in Fridle . When the insDector � ti. ,.r.e e s. (h) For purposes of interpretation of the provisions of this Chapter, the most recently published edition of the National Electrical Code shall be prima facie evidence of the definitions, interpretations and scope of words and terms used in this Chapter. (i) In addition to the above fees, the inspection fee for each separate inspection of a swimming pool shall be computed at $15.00. Reinforcing steel for swimming pools requires a rough-in inspection. (3) Minor Repair Work Defined. Minor repair work as used in rinnesota Statutes, Section 326.244 shall mean the adjustment cr repair and replacement of worn or defective parts of electrical fixtures, switches, receptacles and other equipment Frovided that such minor repairs are made in compliance with accepted standards of construction for safety to life and Froperty as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 326.243 and co not require replacement of the wiring to them. The City's inspectors or agents may inspect any such minor repairs at the zequest of the owner or person making such repairs. (4) Condemnation of Hazardous Installations.// Such tondemnation is ordered// When an electrical inspector finds that a new installation or part of a new installation that is rot energized is not in compliance with accepted standards of construction as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sect �/ �� 6'the :afety Standards of the Minnesota Electrical Act, . �nspector shall, if the installation or the noncomplying part thereof is such as to seriously and proximately endanger human J ife and property if it was to be enerqized, order with the 9K approval of the Building Inspector, immediate condemnation of the installation or noncomplyinq part. When the person zesponsible for makinq the installation condemned hereunder is notified, they ehall promptly proceed to make the c�rrections cited in //thie// ie condemnation order. (Ref. 9 D1) (5) Disconnection of Hazardous Installation: // Such disconnection is order.ed// If while making an inspection, the electrical inspector finds that a new installation that is energized is not in compliance with accepted standards of c�nstruction as required by Minnesota Statutes, Secti�/ ��•the Safety Standards of the Minnesota Electrical Act, . inspector shall, if the installation or the noncomplying part thereof is such as to seriously and proximately endanger human life and property, order immed�ate disconnection of the installation or noncomplying part. When the person responsible f�r making the installation ordered disconnected hereunder is n�tified, they shall promptly proceed to make the corrections cited in this disconnect order. (Ref. 901) (6) Corrections of Noncomplying Installations. When a noncomplying installation whether energized or not, is not Froximately dangerous to human life and property, the inspector shall issue a correction order, ordering the owner or c�ntractor to make the installation comply with accepted standards of construction for safety to life and property, n�ting specifically what changes are required. The order of the inspector shall specify a date of not less than 10 nor a�re than 17 calendar days from the date of the order. F. ;[ovinq of D�►ellinq or Buildinq Foe. The �ermit fee for the moving of a dwellinq or building shall be in a;cordance with the following schedule: F�r Principle Building .........................$ 80.00 For Accessory Building.. .....................$ 20.00 F�r moving through, within or out of the City..$ 15.00 G. Ireckinq Parmit Foe. (1) For any permit for the wrecking of any building or portion t hereof, the fee charged for each such building included in such permit shall be based on the cubical contents thereof and shall be at the rate of one dollar and twenty-five cents ($1.25) for each one thousand (1000) cubic feet or fraction t hereof . (2) Far structures which would be impractical to cube, the �recking permit fee shall be based on the total cost of �recking such structure at the rate of six dollars ($6.00) for each five hundred dollars ($500.00) or fraction thereof. 9L (:�) In no case shall the fee charqed for any wrecking permit b�: less than fifteen dollars ($15.00). H. later and B�M�r F��s. (A�f. 901) H�►drant Rental Agreement - Service Charge........$ 25.00 (for use of hydrant or for hose/equipment use) W�ter Usage ....................... .............•//S 0.65// ..0.75 1,000 qallons used �Lnimum S10 00 vlus Refundable D��osit on EQUi�ment Witer Taps. $160.00 ...................................... S:reet Patch - First 5 sq. yds ...................$150.00 Next 10 sq. yds ................................$15.00/sq.yd. Over 15 sq. yds ................................$ 7.50/sq.yd. W3ter Meter Repair - Weekend & Holidays..........$ 35.00 Witer Connections Permit .........................$ 15.00 S:wer Connections Permit .........................$ 25.00 Sewer O-Dapter ...................................$ 5.00 Inspection Fee for Repair on Water/Sewer Lines...$ 15.00 I. �and �lterations, $zcavatinq or aradinq Fees. (Rei. 90�) r0cubic yards or less ...........................$ 15.00 _1 to 100 cubic yards ............................$ 22•50 ]O1 to 1,000 cubic yards ................. .......$ 22.50 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $10.50 for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof. :,001 to 10,00o cubic yards ........................$117.00 for the first 1,000 cubic yards plus $9.00 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. .0,001 to 100,000 cubic yards ......................$198.00 for the first 10,00o cubic yards plus $40.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. L00,001 cubic yards or more ........................$562.50 for the first 100,000 cubic yards plus $22.50 for each additional 100,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. Land Alteration Plan-Checking Fees: 50 cubic yards or less ............................. No Fee 51 to 100 cubic yards ..............................$ 15.00 l01to 1,000 cubic yards ...........................$ 22.50 1,001 to 10,00o cubic yards ........................$ 30.00 9M 1),001 to 100,00o cubic yards ......................S 30.00 for the first 10,000 cubic yards plus $15.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 1)0,001 to 200,000 cubic yards .....................S165.00 for the first 100,000 cubic yards plus $9.00 for each � additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 2J0,001 cubic yards or more ........................$255.00 for the first 200,000 cubic yards plus $4.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. J. P�llution �tonitorinq Raqistration Fo• (R•i. 929, 947) 1. Each pollution monitoring location shall require a site m3p, description and length of monitoring time requested. (For matter of definition pollution monitoring location shall m:an each individual tax parcel.) There shall be an initial application and plan check fee of Twenty Five Dollars ($25). 2. The applicant for a Pollution Control Registration shall p rovide the City_ with a hold harmless statement for any damages cr claims made to the. City regarding location, construction, cr contaminates. 3. An initial registration fee of Fifty Dollars ($50) is due and payable to the City of Fridley at or before commencement cf the installation. 4. An annual renewal registration fee of Fifty Dollars ($50) and annual monitoring activity reports for all individual l�cations must be made on or before September first of each year. If renewal is not filed on or before October first of each year the applicant must pay double the fee. 5 A final pollution monitoring activity report must be submitted to the City within (30) days of termination of aonitoring activity. 206.O1. DOIIBLE FBES Shoul� any person begin work of any kind such as hereinbefore set forth, or far which a permit from the Building Code Department is required by this Chapter without having eecured the necessary permit therefore from the Building Code Department either previous to or during the day where such work is commenced, or on the next succeeding business day when work is commenced on a Saturday, SundaY or a holiday, they shall, when subsequently securing such 9N permit ,, be required to pay double the fees provided for such permit and siall be subject to all the penal provisions of said Code. (Ref. 901) 206.0:. REINSP$CTION FB8 1. 2 reinspection fee of �//tilteen dollars (515.00)// thirty 30 i�OL shall be assessed for each inspection or reinspection when ��uch portion of work for which the inspection is called for is not complete or when corrections called for are not made. (Ref. 9oi) 2. Tris Section is not to be interpreted as requiring reinspection fees �:he first time a job is rejected for failure to comply with the r�:quirements of this Code, but as controlling the practice of calli� ig for inspections before the job is ready for such inspection or re:.nspection. 3. R�:inspection fees may be assessed when the permit card is not prope: �ly posted on the work site, or the approved plans are not readi..y available for the inspection, or for failure to provide acces;� on the date and time for which inspection is requested, or for daviating from plans requiring the approval of the Building Offic .al. 4. t[here reinspection fees have been assessed, no additional inspe�:tion of the work will be performed until the required fees have : �een paid. 206.Oi. CERTIFICATE OF OCCIIPANCY 1. E::cept for single family residential structures, a Certificate of Oc�:upancy stating that all provisions of this Chapter have been fully complied with, shall be obtained from the City: �. Before any structure for which a building permit is -equired is used or occupied. A temporary Certificate of )ccupancy may be issued when the building is approved for �ccupancy but the outside development is partially incompleted. (Ref. 901) 3. Or before any nonconforming use is improved or enlarged. 2. A� �plication for a Certificate of Occupancy shall be made to the City ahen the structure or use is ready for occupancy and within ten (l0) days thereafter the City shall inspect such structure or use a�d if found to be in conformity with all provisions of this Chaptar, shall sign and issue a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. � Certificate of Compliance shall be issued to all existing legal nonconforming and conforming uses which do not have a CertiEicate of Occupancy after all public health, safety, conve7ience and general welfare conditions of the City Code are in compl iance . 4. N� permit or license required by the City of Fridley or other . � goverrmental agency shall be issued by any department official or emplo�ee of the City of such qovernmental agency, unless the application for such permit or license is accompanied by proof of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Compl' ance . 5. C2.ange in Occupancy: A. The City will be notified of any occu�ancy at the time this change occurs commErcial structures within the City. chanqe in ownership or for all industrial and B. ,► new Certificate of Occupancy or Compliance will be issued afte�� notification. A thirty-five dollar ($35.00) fee will be asse:;sed for this certificate. 6. E cisting Structure or Use: A. In the case of a structure or use established, altered, enla-ged or moved, upon the issuance and receipt of a Special Use Perm�t, a Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued only if all the cond'�tions thereof shall have been satisfied. B. Whenever an inspection of an existing structure or use is required for issuance of a new Certificate of Occupancy, a thir:y-five dollar ($35.00) fee will be charged. If it ilicable that such structure or use does not conform to the app requirements, the structure or use shall not be occupied until such time as the structure or use is again brought into compliance with such requirements. 206.C7. CONTRl�CTOR�B LICENBEB 1. :t is deemed in the interest of the public and the residents of the City of Fridley that the work involved in building alteiation and construction and the installation of various appl' ances and service facilities in and for said buildings be done only by individuals, firms and corporations that have demonstrated or si.bmitted evidence of their competency to perform such work in acco��dance with the applicable codes of the City of Fridley. 2. Zhe permits which the Building Inspector is authorized to issue unde:• this Code shall be issued only to individuals, firms or corp�►rations holding a license issued by the City for work to be perf�>rmed under the permit, except as hereinafter noted. 3. ;tequirements. Appl'�cation for license shall be made to the Building Code Depa-tment and such license shall be granted by a majority vote of the :ouncil upon proof of the applicant's qualifications thereof, will�nqness to comply with the provisions of the City Code, filing of :ertificates evidencing the holding of public liability insurance in the limits of $50,000 per person, $100,000 per . • accidEnt for bodily injury, and $25,000 for property damages and certi�icates of Worker's Compensation insurance as required by State law and if applicable, list a Minnesota State Tax Ident:fication number. (Ref. 901) 4 . F� :e . The fEe for each license required by the provision of this Section shall be thirty-five dollars ($35.00) per year. 5. E: �iration. All licenses issued under the provisions of this Section shall expir�: on April 30th, following the date of issuance unless sooner revok��d or forfeited. If a license qranted hereunder is not renew��d previous to its expiration then all riqhts granted by such licen.�e shall cease and any work performed after the expiration of the l.cense shall be in violation of this Code. 6 . R� :newal . Perso: is rendate hallrbe charged the full annual Slicenseafeer tNo expir �tion prora:ed license fee shall be allowed. 7. S�ecific Trades Licensed. Licen�es shall be obtained by every person engaging in the follo�ing businesses or work in accordance with the applicable Chapt=rs of the City of Fridley. A, c�eneral contractors in the business of building construction. B. liasonry and brick work. C. : toofing. D. �lastering, stucco work, sheetrock taping. E. ieating, ventilation and refrigeration. F. �as piping, gas services, gas equipment installation. G. >il heating and piping work. H. Excavations, including excavation for footings, basements, sewe� and water line installations. I. �lrecking of buildings. J. 3ign erection, construction and repair, including billboards and :lectrical signs. K. 3lacktopping and asphalt work. :himney sweeps. 8. Ei.ployees and Subcontractors. A licEnse granted to a qeneral contractor under this Section shall incluc.e the right to perform all of the work included in the gener�,l contract. Such license shall include any or all of the persoi,s performing the work which is classified and listed in this Code �roviding that each person performing such work is in the regul�.r employ and qualified under State law and the provisions of this 3uilding Code to perform such work. In these cases, the qener�.l contractor shall be responsible for all of the work so perfo��med. Subcontractors on any work shall be required to comply with �:he Sections of this Code pertaining to license, insurance, permi1., etc., for their particular type of work. (Ref. 901) 9. S�ispension and Revocation Generally. The CLty Council shall have the power to suspend or revoke the licen:;e of any person licensed under the regulations of this Secti� +n, whose work is found to be improper or defective or so unsaf�: as to jeopardize life or property providing the person holdi��g such license is given twenty (20) days notice and granted the o:>portunity to be heard before such action is taken. If and when ;�uch notice is sent to the legal address of the licensee and they `ail or refuse to appear at the said hearing, their license will i�e automatically suspended or revoked five (5) days after date of he; �ring. 10. "ime of Suspension. When � license issued under this Section is of su: ;pension shall be not less than thirty one (�) year, such period being determined il. tevocation, Reinstatement. suspended, the period ( 3 0) days nor more than by the City Council. When any person holding a license as provided herein has been convi:ted for the second time by a court of law for violation of any o` the provisions of this Code, the City Council shall revoke the l�cense of the person so convicted. Such person maed=ot make appli:ation for a new license for a period of one (1) y 12, ?ermit to Homeowner. The c�wner of any single family property may perform work on prope�ty which the owner occupies so long as the work when perfo:med is in accordance with the Codes of the City and for such purpo �e a permit may be qranted to such owner without a license abtai zed. 13. 3tate Licensed Contractor's Excepted. • ! . . Those persons who possess valid State licenses issued by the State of Mi inesota shall not be required to obtain a license from the City; they shall, however be required to file proof of the exist�:nce of a valid State license together with proof of satis'actory worker's Compensation and Public Liability insurance cover� �ge. (Ref. 901) 14. ;�ublic Service Corporations Excepted. Publi�: service corporations shall not be required to obtain licen, �es for work upon or in connection with their own property excep�: as may be provided by other Chapters. 15. llanufacturers Excepted. Manuf, ►cturers shall not be required to obtain licenses for work incor;�orated within equipment as part of manufacturing except as may b�: provided by other Sections of this Code. 16. ,►ssumption of Liability. This >ection shall not be construed to affect the responsibility or l:ability of any party owning, operating, controlling or insta.ling the above described work for damages to persons or prope-ty caused by any defect therein; nor shall the City of Fridl:y be held as assuming any such liability by reason of the licen:ing of persons, firms or corporations engaged in such work. 206.0 t. IITZLITY EYCAVATIOI�IS 1, parmit Required. Befor: any work is performed which includes cutting a curb or excavition on or under any street or curbing a permit shall be appli:d for from the City. The Public Works Department shall verif� the location of the watermain and sanitary sewer connections befor: any excavation or qrading shall be permitted on the premi >es. The permit shall specify the location, width, length and depth of the necessary excavation. It shall further state the speci°ications and condition of public facility restoration. Such speci`ications shall require the public facilities to be restored to at least as good a condition as they were prior to commencement of wo^k. Concrete curb and gutter or any street patching shall be const:vcted and inspected by the City, unless specified otherwise. 2. D:posit - Required. A. Where plans and specifications indicate that proposed work incl��des connection to sanitary sewer, watermain, a curb cut or any >ther disruption that may cause damaqe to the facilities of the �'ity, the application for permit shall be accompanied by a twa hund�ed dollar ($200.00) cash deposit as a guarantee that all rest�>ration work will be completed and City facilities left in an unda:iaged condition. B. �he requirement of a cash deposit shall not apply to any publ�c utility corporation franchised to do business within the City. 3. M<,ximum Deposit. No pe��son shall be required to have more than four hundred dollars ($400 00) on deposit with.the City at any one time by reason of this �ection; provided that such deposit shall be subjected to compl.ance with all the requirements of this Section as to all build.ng permits issued to such person prior to the deposit being refun� led. 4. Iispections. A. F efore any backfillinq is done in an excavation approved under this division the City shall be notified for a teview of the cond.tions of construction. B. Iuring and after restoration the City Engineer or a designated agen: shall inspect the work to assure compliance. (Ref. 901) 5. R:turn of Deposit. The P iblic Works Director shall authorize refundment of the deposit when -estoration has been completed to satisfactory compliance with this 3ection. . 6. F�rfeiture of Deposit. Any �erson who fails to complete any of the requirements shall forfeit to the City such portion of the deposit as is necessary to pay f�r having such work done. 206.G9. BUILDING SITE REQIIIREMENTS 1. Ceneral. In acdition to the provisions of this Section, all building site requ�rements of the City's Zoning Code Chapter 205 and additions shal] be followed before a building permit may be issued. 2, itilities and Street Required. 9S No bLilding permit shall be issued for any new construction unless and L ntil all utilities are installed in the public street adjacent to t2.e parcel of land to be improved and the rough qrading of the adja<;ent street has been completed to the extent that adequate stre�;t access to the parcel is available. 3. "railer Prohibitions. Exce� �t in a trailer or mobile home park, the removal of wheels from 9T any tz ailer or the remodeling of a trailer through the construction of a�oundation or the enclosure of the space between the base of the trailer and the qround, or throuqh the construction of addit:ons to provide extra floor space will not be considered as confo�ming with the City's Building Code in any respect and will there�ore be prohibited. 4. Ec�uipment and Material Storage. No construction equipment and/or material pertaining to const:�uction shall be stored on any property within the City witho�it a valid building permit. When construction is completed and a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued, any construction equip� sent or materials must be removed within thirty (30) days from the i�suance date on the Certificate of Occupancy. 5. C �nstruction Work Hours. It sl�all be unlawful for any person or company acting as a contr3ctor for payment, to engage in the construction of any building, structure or utility including but not limited to the makin� of any excavation, clearing of surface land and loading or unloa3ing materials, equipment or supplies, anywhere in the City exce� t between the hours of 7: 00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. , Monday through Friday and between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m• on SatuYdays and legal holidays. However, such activity shall be lawfLl if an alternate hours work permit therefore has been issued by th � City upon application in accordance with requirements of the paracraph below. It shall be unlawful to engage in such work or acti�ity on Sunday or any legal holiday unless an alternate hours work permit for such work has first been issued. Nothing in this Chapt er shall be construed to prevent any work necessary to prevent inju��y to persons or property at any time. 6. i,lternate Hours Work Permit. Appl..cations for an alternate hours work permit shall be made in writ.ng to the Public Works Director and shall state the name of the applicant and the business address, the location of the prop�sed work and the reason for seeking a permit to do such work, as w�:ll as the estimated time of the proposed operations. No such permlt shall be issued excepting where the public welfare will be harm :d by failure to perform the work at the times indicated. (Ref . 901) 7. 3afeguards. Warning barricades and lights shall be maintained whenever necessary for the protection of pedestrians and traffic; and tem��rary roofs over sidewalks shall be constructed whenever there is danger from falling articles or materials to pedestrians. 206.10. DRAINAGE AND GRADING t-'1`J 1. Iivestigation. After a building permit has been applied for and prior to the issuaice of said permit, the City shall thoroughly investigate the existing drainage features of the property to be used. 2. O�struction of Natural Drainage Prohibited. No bLilding permit shall be issued for the construction of any building on which construction or necessary qrading thereto shall obstrict any natural drainage waterway. 3. Uzdrainable Lands. No b�ilding permit shall be issued for the construction of any building upon ground which cannot be properly drained. 4. Frotection of Existing Drainage Installations. A. l ihere application is made for a building permit and subsequent investigation shows that the property to be occupied by said builiing is adjacent to a portion of a public road or street cont3ining a drainaqe culvert, catch basin, sewer, special ditch or any other artificial drainage structures used for the purpose of iraining said property and/or neighboring property, the applicant shall specifically agree in writing to protect these wate rways in such a way that they shall not be affected by the pro�osed building construction or grading work incidental thereto. B. No land shall be altered and no use shall be permitted that resclts in water run-off causing flooding, erosion or deposits of minerals on adjacent properties. Stormwater run-off from a developed site will leave at no qreater rate or lesser quality thar the stormwater run-off from the site in an undeveloped concition. Stormwater run-off shall not exceed the rate of run-off of the undeveloped land for a 24 hour storm with a 1 year retLrn frequency. Detention facilities shall be designed for a 24 2-our storm with a 100 year return frequency. All run-off shall be ��roperly channeled into a storm drain water course, ponding are� or other public facility designed for that purpose. Any charge in grade affecting water run-off onto an adjacent property must be approved by the City. 5, tirder to Reqrade. The �:ity may order the applicant to reqrade property if existing grad� : does not conform to any provision of this Section, if the qrad�: indicated in the preliminary plan has not been followed, or if tl�e qrade poses a drainaqe problem to neighborinq properties. 2 0 6 . '.1. 11AT$RB , �TER11AY8 1. )efinition. As us �d in this Section, the term waters and/or waterways shall inclu�le all public waterways as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Secti��n 105.38 and shall also include all bodies of water, natural or art.ificial, includinq ponds, streams, lakes, swamps and ditches which are a part of or contribute to the collection, runoff or stora� �e waters within the City or directly or indirectly affect the colle�:tion, transportation, storage or disposal of the storm and surfa:e waters system in the City. 2. P:rmit Required. No person shall cause or permit any waters or waterways to be creat:d, dammed, altered, filled, dredged or eliminated, or cause the ��ater level elevation thereof to be artificially altered withoit first securing a permit from the City, State or watershed managament organization as appropriate. 3. A�plication for Permit. Appli �ations for permits required by the provisions of this Section shall be made in writing upon printed forms furnished by the City Clerk. 4. Scope of Proposed Work. Applications for permits required by this Section shall be acconpanied with a complete and detailed description of the propc sed work together with complete plans and topographical survey map �:learly illustrating the proposed work and its effect upon existing waters and water handling facilities. 5. 1 ees. A fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) shall be paid to the City and upon the filing of an application for a permit required by the prov: sions of this Section to defray the costs of investigating and cons:dering such application. 206.:.2. PENALTIES Any �►iolation of this Chapter is a misdemeanor and is subject to all ��enalties provided for such violations under the provisions of Chap�:er 901 of this Code. PASS::D AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1990. WILLIAM J.NEE -MAYOR ATTE �T : 9V 9W SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK First Reading: Secon3 Reading: Publication: , � � c�nroF F�� C�l1I1MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEM4R.ANDUM Dl�TE November 6, 1990 � � � TO: William Burns, City Manager �• FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant 80BJFCT: Variance Request, VAR �90-27, by Weldon Fenton � Attached is the staff report for the above request. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommenc� approval of the request to tY:e City Council. As the petitioner has other alternatives which would allow him to meet :ode, staff recommends that the City Council deny the request. MM:ls M-90-�89 i _ 10A � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE october 30, 1990 CI�TY �F PLAN�VG CONNVISSION DATE FRlDLEY CITY COI�IC�L DATE November 19, 1990 �� NII`":ls � REQUEST PERMIT NUME ER APPLICANT PROPOSED R EQUEST LOCATION S1TE DATA StZE DENSlTY PRESENT ZO' JING ADJACENT L AND USES 8 ZONIN� UTLIT�S PARK DEDIC� ►TION ANALY:�IS I FlNANCIAL I� IPLICATIONS CONFORMAI JCE TO CpMPREI �NSNE PLAN COMPAT�IU TY WITH ADJACENT JSES 8� ZONNG ENV�iONME' �tTAL CONS DERATIONS STAFF REC �MMEI�ATION APPEALS R =COMMENDATION PLANNING � ;OMMISSION RE ;COMMENDATION � VAR #90-27 Welcbn Fenton To reduoe the side yard setback fro�n 10 feet to 6 feet 640 - 67tn Avenue ra.E. h�l, Single Family Dwelling I�-1, Single FaQnily Dwelling, tA the ��, N, and E; Hayes Elementary Sci�ool to the S Denial •.. . 10B Stalf Report VAR #90-27, 640 - 67th Avenue N.E. - Weldon Fenton PagE 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) requires a side yard setback of l0 feet between any ,living area and side property line. The public purpose of this requirement is to reduce the possibility of fire to adjacent structures and to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential structures. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "To a11ow us to enclose an existing porch." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: RecLuest The petitioner, Weldon Fenton, is requesting that a variance be granted to reduce the side yard setback for a living area from 10 feet to 6 feet in order to convert an existing patio area into a three season porch. The request is for Lot 2, Block 6, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 6, the same being 640 - 67th Avenue N.E. Site A single family dwelling unit with an attached single car garage is located on the property. The parcel is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the west, north, and east. The parcel abuts the Hayes Elementary School property. Analysis The proposed three season porch would enclose a patio area that currently exists to the rear of the single car garage. At the time the garage was built, the garage roof was designed in such a way as to overhang a 7 ft. 4 in. by 17 ft. IO in. patio area to the rear of the garage. The petitioner is proposing to enclose this patio area to create a three season porch. Several of the homes in this area have similar overhang/patio areas. The purpose of the required side yard setback is to ensure that there is adequate separation between structures and to provide fire protection between structures. 10C Staif Report VAR #90-27, 640 - 67th Avenue N.E. - Weldon Fenton PagE 3 The petitioner has other alternatives he could use to provide this type of recreational space. The petitioner could construct a detached gazebo in the rear yard, or the petitioner could construct an addition to the rear of the house to create a separate three season porch addition. Recommendation As the petitioner does have two other alternatives which would allow him to meet the code requirements and also meet the need of the family to have additional living space, staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the request, VAR #90-27, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 6 feet. A�peals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the variance request to the City Council. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council deny the variance request as the petitioner has other alternatives which would allow him to meet Code. SE�:. /4, T. 30, C/TY �F fR/OLEY �� Nl/1 COTMfR �� SEG- �� —'°� ': :� r ,�`' s.,'� �: - -.. , • .`. � ,: .:..• _„a _ ?,, � � E � i � 'C t �;! �3 .M • �i `� , ' �'� � � . ,,: ' r `� Y, , ,� • � � � ; ` ,•� JE � ( : E� � , ,-�.� . •y�. � .:,Y bK' � . '+�1 � / ,. �� r .�� <-*;��, ..1..;�.=.,�`,5, - . . % u`� <' z � � �4� VAR ��90-27 Weldon Fenton R. 24 1,Q„� : rMF .. � orr�c:. irros �Q� AEiERfN� �Y IS IJC ICCUII �2 � � � i.�+.�..... .�,.�9i- .�: ;, - ' , � � �. �„."�"� ORNE'' • �. � •� :� f� .� ..x.. y� n3 ...^'��%\,�.. �an� � �~�y " � � i � . � r � 'I zl' ," _ ' t,l� a • ! � Q�OV/• I,�� 1 , .,r'i I ,�, "f. .� � • .`�� r ��4 , .2'i �z �R = �� M �ENNASTON " "' �RIV , s a� -.. �. ;� 'r o� . "3r'F s �i �, � - � ^ - •*;� d� .� � ,�, ` . r. , ��• ; .. .. . ". ' . ' ` �.:r� t ?. �`� � r • � ; : •� - �i , � ` �'3 d 7 . . 'i s i � ; , 'i � 7 �. .; � r. ti' d .,t .. . � . : ' . • � � • • ± fi„' - .. , �� • �' , ,'�,, ,y.�-� • � '�'� t ' i J r . r �/ ' r f = 2 ' h• d � �►' ¢-` �� i9 �� •� t1 •ti 'i s� },i .. 4V�" y -� di "� 4~� `i R ` - � .. . •. . > � "`'' � % . ' 2 z - -TrAfi+f 1rYE� i�F.$" . --'�'� �"" i •1 + '�,� ,�' —�" r� " � '* i ' T— '.,� ` �'s' , .-+..��^: . G� , b.• _ <. Vl.` h '� Y�; y s•� • •,4 � a,�•�} • . Qi �!' � ��iiy� ��,.: s` -� �' �.. , �r^ �' . ��z .. z . .. - �. rr'a� Z , I : ' 9 2 �,; ' . � , M6 ,b ; � _ , � , � , . , � o� � �w� ' �\ yf �4� F� .c :3'` '��•3 Y c ^' � �,c-a �4 N� = . .� ,K�_ [ .../�A.. � _ • O � � • . ' - u : . `. ' ..., _ �/ Y• • ' � � ., � .. ..r = � � " tA 9 ' .`, � � 2 ' . � • 9 � � S = V --:.if.� .1 . ', � � •.� ' r {� �y� ' e q ' S � .2 . 3 I� a �� ' r .f �..• < ; o' , ,; � = � i � � � . � 9 -` 3 '� 9 � j ' � ��_ s� r ...�,�, � __ ,or .�.+� J ' r ' �. r f �. �tr. � f ' • . • , y . AVF. N ' , - ,.r'_ � ,� � s � r..r•,,� � r- •__ ; . ' : ,. . s �.. - . �.' , � y �� +� ,�j s � 9 i , 9 � �j s 9 s'J = � � � s � ' •..,� ,� .... •� '� . ,.. " .�� L� .e. -.. � / ��/ �� .� ¢� ,•2: b ti ' • ' �, V "I �/T�� X='. r` �I � � Lc�s i-�s NtP� J� f P AGE ' s rME •• , � :, . , . � t � � � ' � "MEA � L� 4VE. N E. "� i.... O-w4i � o.., w. ._ ,� i, W a p r - � � '''2. � � 9' p,� ES S GN � i: up'.�� r,o L� J� = � i 6 6 T N A V E. � ; •;,-� ; �.3 . R�� -Na..: ----, ' ', . . `, � . R PL ------ • - • � r !�' z � �-c E �' 3 ° '� 3 � ' .. . . - �: .: y 1 .. . - 1. ! � c�ovE _ ; - . K ' � � , �El'�R�C � �.;�,-;�,.., f,�A�.p�jr' � - ; _ � . 3� � 2 � " � ,;400�1T�0 � a .-�i�.».'c�•�� ., � �YY.' / � j,. �_ a'"— - CEh'�E�a � - - - - (� r � Slt • � � 14 17 . '� f01AN0 � �-�� .. . LOCATION MAP � F g : ,-' .►1 E N r� � �f I a �_ � ,. -' ► � � � � .� ; a "� �� 1�� ,i� T H � �AY , -� � j% 6 B 6l ,� , /9 �N � .�j, � � J�� 1 �; � � b � +�l � ' �� _.�► , av . �! I ��s1��"`��! . ..� CtREE Ks TERRA� � VAR �� 90-2 7 Weldon Fenton •y • t i • 10E �� , ,� � � J �`r� -i ►r 4 � � � - �,o� ZONING IdIAP E ' " . � :, ' . . . r•. � .a a �F �Ri ,� • "✓ •.t � .+r r 'kx`4. . }i. !!q �^ .. � . ` �.. ,�'' y t « . � ;' � .� � ' . . �a .� p .�;i �AS..,�'..:. j� � �: �. g��,� !�` t' ;� j C,�'"�.�, .�,�. .� "� 1. `'�. � , f�r �� •".}�•.. �_ . • •'.: �.�, ,+• 1 i , `�. � = ��f �i�s,�,. ..; t . . .-K % . .' � s t'� j � aG � •...yl. ,,��a. .�r�;� � i � -��141ti^:�94 ��/ i . . � :.Z Y� � ; ,�,�. . ♦ . ' + I .� � � , •Y `-i � � • " �� ' �..��Y 1W � �G , � � .� jr�� 7�i�r � 4 �( ��. , �� 1` �; :1 r� ��G��E :. -(�_� o:, N�,. �.�.� , � I� �IINDER . M. :, �: � ENGINEERS`� AND � SV�RVEYORSy - �� =� ' ��" , : , a.` � " �' : - i` `. , ._ '. r Y�M� � � � '� � � . � � � ; � � � � • � �O�I.O TL�'�i1N� ' ` ��4 �.! I.J►MI �VA ! ,. •;' '�, � : �. '•�s. ` t .r. . `l.I�%�O R.ANNiNO . - - GVt . ir MVNIGIPIJ.� ENO�NLERINr l�. ' r.. • , t�, � �° . . G418—SGtM AvENUi N• - , :�, r , ' , . ..' _• � � • �': . � �� . . = ..; - � � � . MINiJEAPOl13...`Y7.M11JN. • . .'`q , • � . - � 'J � - KE T- 363T ; . . . ' . 'w � . . . ic�i�� •� �*r�►�. , ` ��T;' . ��r�iE , � : � . : � �: ' for . — -- • .. .__.__.----- . . . � . f'� �� Dh� ` f� � � y�,�- �� ; _ _ . _. ` -- =' .__--. . , 6 7 -- A v�. �: � : 1 , � i 1 � ` �� . . ._ . ' _ �--. _�.--,. , . i� � i It31 �;::. --,.- -- ---- ;--7 i !� f�. .- j. - .. _�/ /: I ��/� •'.. i / . � , - �i / t`i .� . � i I i � r.�� ... � �; `r �wo �---�,� � � ;. � 4 .` . � i� � ;. ' �- ;, _ � ` � �1 �' _ �_ v — _ -- - •- --.- -- ' - �.•. .. �. - - --i � �✓ �r' � �� , 7 : �;. � � - �� -- -�,-% �� : _ �� . . -- -✓ LcT � .�,_ -,-.:A,;; �,.� ��.•�-.-,-- :i�l�^•�F._�.- r=��.�� c._. �_ ,� •.. � :.___, ; YYE HE tE9Y CERT�FY TMAT 7M15 �S A TAUE M1� CORRECT REPRESENTl�T101�1 OF A. SVRYEY OF THE 60tfN�I�R1E5 OF TNE ��,ND �gpYE DESCRiBED ANO OFTNE LOGA710N OF ALl b11�LOtNGS, if A13Y, TNEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS iF iwr � FQOM ORON SNO I.AND. MtNDER ENGtNEERING CO., INC. ' "` �� " AA.1�j� ANO � iVRvEYORs OATED ' M�S �` a``� � EN6��t�ERS , t' % ' � . ` /� . �/ ..i r ° �.�� / � ; -< �1 L•- ; t • _.._ - a,,., . , �� . � — VAR 4�90-27 Weldon Fenton SITE PLAN 10H CITY O! lAZDLEY �pPa71L6 COMMIBBIOIi ILEETIMG, OCTOBEA 30, 1990 ........._. �........ .....................,...�...�..........�................... ............ ��,: b ORDER : Vice-�:hairperson Ruechle. called the October 30, 1990, Appeals Commi;sion meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. $O,� ' : Membecs Present: Larry Kuechle, Ren Vos, Cathy Smith Members Absent: Diane Savage Othezs Present: Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Weldon Fenton, 640 - 67th Avenue N.E. Jack Rreaqer, Health One Unity Hoepital Glenn Johnson, Siqn Loqic, Inc. Dennis Garner, 7119 Ashton Avenue N.E. Patrick Boyle, 6261 Rainbow Drive N.E. � • • : ' � • Yly � Y � MOTI�>N by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the October 2, 1r90, Appeals Commission minutes as written. IIPON !1 VOICE VOTE, ]1LL VOTING 11YE, VIC$-CSllIRPBRBON 1COECSLE DECL �D T8E I�iOTIOI�i C!►RRIBD �N�1NIl�[OIIBLY. 1. �ONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #90-27. BY WELDON 1�LT'LQN • Per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 6 feet, to allow the enclosure of an existing porch on Lot 2, Block 6, Rice Creek Terrace Plat 6, the eame being 640 - 67th Avenue N.E. Ms. McPherson stated the property fs zoned R-1, Sinqle Family Dwe] ling, as is the property to the west, north, and east. The pro��erty directly abuts the Hayes Elementary School property on the south. The proposed three season porch would enclose an exia,ting patio area which is located to the rear of the single car qar��ge portion of the dwellinq unit. The area that is proposed to be �snclosed is approximately 7 ft. 4 in. by 17 ft. l0 in. There are several other homes in this area that have similar patio areas at the rear of the qaraqe, some of which appear to have been con�rerted to �screened-in porches. She did check the address files and there did not appear to be similar variances qranted in this nei�hborhood. h� ,�r - - • -�- c �l�l+i� � ' ' c . Ms. M:Pher�on stated the purpose of the code 10 fo�t setback is to ensure that there is betwe:n structures and to ensure that there prote:tion between structures. requirement for the adequate separation is some type of fire Ms. HcPherson stated the petitioner has other alternatives that could be explored to provide this type of recreational Bpace. There would be adequate setback for the petitioner to construct an addition to the rear cf the house, or the petitioner could const cuct some type of detached qazebo in the rear yard. Ms. +icPherson stated that as the petitioner does two other alternatives which would allow him to meet the code requirements, staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the �ariance request to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 6 feet. 101 MOTIt�N by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to open the public hear: ng . IIPON !� VOZCE VOTB, 71LL VOTING ]►Y8, 9IC$-CH7�lIRP1%RBON 1CIIECHLE DECL� ►RED TH8 l�[OTION CIIRRI$D ]1ND T88 PIIBLIC BEl1RII�i�i OPEI�i 71T 7:44 P.M. Mr. �Teldon Fenton stated the qarage is 6 feet from the property line, and it is not a fire hazard. Why would a three season porch on t ie back make it any more of a fire hazard? Mr. '�eldon Fenton stated his elderly mother-in-law lives with them. They would like to enclose the patio area with an entrance into the gara�e from the new porch. This will make it much easier for his moth er-in-law who is in a wheelchair to qet into and out of the car during the winter time when it fs enowy and icy. He stated the porch will not be heated in the wintertime. There are other houses in the area that have done the same thinq and are not 10 feet from the property line. He stated he has talked to the neighbors and theS are in favor of this addition. Ms. Marie Harry, 650 - 67th Avenue, stated she is the neighbor to the east. She stated they have no objection to the enclosing of the patio area. She stated it would aide Mr. and Mrs. Fenton in gett:ing Mrs. Fenton's mother in and out durinq the wintertime. She could not foresee any problems in the future, even if the house is ;:old to someone else. �:ON by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the public hea �ing . IIPO!T A VOICS VOT$, AI+L VOTINa 11Y8, VICS-CBAIRPBR80N �OSCHLE D$C LARED T8B 1[OTION C1�iRRI$D 11�iD TS8 pIIBLIC 8$l�RZIdQ CL08$D ]IT 7 s 50 P.M . 10J �i_ r � , • , + - - : c .��+ i• : � ' ` � Ms. Smith etated she had no problem recommendinq approval of this variance. The roof line is already there because of the existing patic area, so there would not be any chanqe in the siqht lines. Also, there are no objections from any of the neighbors. Dr. V �s stated there will. etill be 16 feet between the livinq space of tie petitioner's house�and the house to the east. Makinq a jog furtYer from the qarage roof line does not make any sense. He thouc ht the spirit of the Code fs really more aesthetic and for fire protection, and he thouqht both of those were beinq met. He woulc, recommend approval of the variance. Mr. l ;uechle concurred. MoTI��N by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recommend to City Coun� :il approval of variance request, VAR #90-27, by Weldon Fenton, per :�ection 205.07.03.D. (2) .(a) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 6 feet, to allow the encl�sure of an existing porch on Lot 2, Block 6, Rice Creek Terrsce Plat 6, the same being 640 - 67th Avenue N.E. OPON A VOICE VOT$, ]1LL VOTI�iQ ]1YE, VICB-CSl1IRPBRBON 1CIIECHLE DECL l�RED TH$ 1[OTION C71RRI$D O�Tl�TII[OOBI�Y. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to the City Council on Novea�ber 19, 1990. 2. ONS RA N F V U'"' - �a•�' UNITY HOSPITAL: Per Section 214.09.O1.B of e Fridley City Code, to increase the square footaqe of an a a identification sign from 24 square feet to 94 square fee to allow the construction of a new area identification sig at 550 Osborne Road (complete leqal description on file). Ms. McPherson stated the property i located just east of the int�:rsection of University Avenue and Osborne Road. It consists of ltealth One Unity Hospital plus the ity Professional Building locited slightly to the west of the hos 'tal complex. Ms. McPherson stated the property is z ed R-1, Single Family DweLling, as are the parcels to the west a d south. There is CR- 1, 3eneral Office, to the east, and the Ci y of Spring Lake Park is to the north . Ms. McPherson stated the parcel has a hist and also contains severa2 types of eiqnage and various informational pylon siqns. Ms. McPherson stated that in 1974, the hospital vai iances to increase the allowable square foota� of siqn variances ludinq wall signs �plied for sign of delivery and � � G1YOF Ftt�DLEY PLANNiNG DIVISION 10 K lVtEMOR,ANDUM DATE: November 1:5, 1990 TO: William Burns, City Manager� � FItOM: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant BIIBJE^T: Alternative Sign Plan for Variance Request, VAR #90-28 Attac hed is an alternative sign plan for Unity Hospital Health One. The ��roposed alternative measures 5 ft. 6 in. by 14 ft. 6 in., instEad of 9 ft. 6 in. by 14 ft. 6 in., for a total square footage of 7� .75 sq. ft. Whil�: the second plan is less than the 80 sq. ft. allowed in the comm�:rcial and industrial districts, it is Btill larger than the 24 s��, ft. allowed in the residential district. Staff recommends that the City Council deny the second alternative. The hospital stil. has 56.83 sq.-ft. which was the variance granted in 1981. I�I :1 a M-90 -824 r ..� �� ;� I �. � ,� �'-f � , .. , .�, i, . ; • ; , . ;�; �: � ! , t; ;: ; . ►s;1, , ,t : . ,► �' , :i Ei . ,; .,� t, � . �— � �� N� i � a� VAR 4f90-28 (Alt.) Health One Unity 10L - --:� I � � . ' CONSTRUCTION � � � � AIUMtNUM .090 GA. CABINET r��►"L� ' ' aouTEO ovr �A��B�acK�o wirH wH�� Ex�w ',� � p E V E A L t SERIES METAL iJI1C�SIL �%� l� SHROUDING .090 ALUMINUM PAlNTE� MATHEWS : • �74. �7> > �� Ff. . , I "l : �� : � � f i �I t � � c�nroF �� Fr��.�r DliTE : TO: C�11/IMLiNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART'MENT' M EMO RAN D l�M November 6, 1990 William Burns, City Manager FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant 808J�CT: Variance Request, VAR #90-28, by Health One Unity Hospital 10M Atta�:hed is the staff report for the above request. The Appeals Comm.ssion voted 2-1 to recommend denial of the request to the City Coun�:il. Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appe�ls Commission's action. MM :1 � M-90 -791 � y oN � STAFF REPC3RT APPEALS DATE OctAber 30, 1990 CITY OF �.nnx�r� con�wssiav DA-� fRIDLEY cmr cou�a� na� November 19, 1990 �utrtioa �'� REQUES�r PERMIT NUMB �R APPLICANT PROPOSED R =QUEST LOCATION SITE DATA SIZE OENSITY PRESENT ZOI �ING ADJACENT L AND USES 8� ZONWC UT1f�ES PARK DEOIC� ►TION ANALY;�IS FINANCIAL 1� IPLICATIONS CONFORMAI JCE TO COMPREI IENSNE PLAN connPa-r��. rY wrrH ADJACENT JSES 8� ZONMVG ENVIRONME �T'AL CONS �ERATIONS STAFF REC OMME(�ATION APPEALS R ECOMMENDATiON PLANNING � :OMMISSION RI :CONMAENDATION VAR #90-28 Health One Unity Hospital Zb allvw the square footage of an area identification sign t,o be increased frcm 24 sq. ft. to 94 sq. ft. 55Q Osborne Road N.E. Fr-1, Single Family Dwelling h-1, Single Family Dwelling, to the W, S; CR-1, General Offioe, to the E; Spring Lake Park to the N Denial �enial �oo Staff Report VAR #90-28, 550 Osborne Road N.E., Health One Unity Hospital Page 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 214.09.01.8 requires a minimum size of 24 square feet for area identification signs. Public purpose served by this requirement is to control visual pollution and excessive use of signs in residential areas. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "The hospital's name has changed; to ensure visibility to the community." C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Reguest The petitioner, Health One Unity Hospital, is requesting that the maximum allowable square footage of an area identification sign be increased from 24 sq. ft. to 94 sq. ft. The request is for 550 Osborne Road N.E. Site The hospital and professional building complex are located on the parcel. There is a large setback from the Osborne right- of-way to the hospital building itself and the parcel contains large numbers of mature oak and maple trees. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the west and south. The parcel to the east is zoned CR-1, General Office, and Spring Lake Park is to the north of the site. Analysis History The parcel has had a histary of sign variances and also contains various types of signage. In 1974, the hospital applied for a sign variance to increase the allowable square footage of delivery signs from 6 sq. ft. to 24 sq. ft. and to increase the allowable square footage of an emergency sign from 6 sq. ft. to 75 sq. ft. The Council denied the variance for the delivery signs but approved a variance for a 75 sq. ft. emergency sign. In 1981, the hospital applied for a sign variance to increase the area identification sign from 24 sq. ft. to 56.83 sq. ft. �zarz Report VAR #90-28, 550 Page 3 Osborne Road N.E., Health One Unity Hospital 10P This variance was granted for the existing hospital sign (see attached drawing and minutes) which is slightly larger than the original area identification sign which was installed without a permit in the early 1970's. In 1985, seven 8 foot free-standing informational signs were issued permits. In addition, the hospital has signs on each face of the canopy over the emergency room entrance. Two of these wall signs are 54 sq. ft., and the third is 70 sq. ft. In 1986, the hospital was granted permits to revise the facias on four pylon signs which are used to identify the various portions of the hospital access points. These pylon signs range in square footage from 33 sq. ft. up to 47 sq. ft. Current Request The current request is to allow a pylon identification sign which would replace the existing hospital identification sign. The proposed sign would be 16 feet tall and 94 sq. ft. in area. Because the sign is located in a residentially zoned area, the Sign Code allows wall signage of 3 sq. ft. and one area identification sign per development of 24 sq. ft. in area. The proposed sign exceeds the maximum of 80 sq. ft. which is allowed in the commercial and industrial districts. Section 214.21.02.A-D. allows variances from the literal provision of the Sign Code if four conditions are met by the petitioner. A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and district. Unity Hospital is the only hospital located within the City of Fridley; however, it is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, and would be classified by the Zoning Code as an institution. Therefore, it would be similarly classified as churches, schools, and governmental agencies which would be required to conform to the signs allowed under the R-1 district. The Code does allow institutional signs up to 32 sq. ft. in area, so the petitioner's request would be greater than the maximum allowed by Section 214.05.06.A. of the Sign Code. The only exception to this would be a hospital emergency sign which could be a maximum of 100 sq. ft. in area (Section 214.05.o6.C.). The purpose of the proposed sign is to provide identification of the hospital to the general public, and not as an emergency sign. 10C� Staff Report VAR #�0-28, 550 Osborne Road N.E., Health One Unity Hospital Page � B. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and district but which is denied the property in question. By denying the variance, the Commission would not deny the right for the hospital to have signage. The variance, which was granted in 1981, would still apply to the property and, therefore, the hospital could have an area identification sign of 56.83 sq. ft. C. That the strict application of the chapter would constitute a unnecessary hardship. Again, as the property was granted a variance in 1981, strict application of the Sign Code is creating an unnecessary hardship. It would limit the area of the sign to only 24 sq. ft. In 1981, the City decided that 56.83 sq. ft. was reasonable. D. That the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district in which the property is located. By limiting the area of the proposed sign, the Commission would be serving the public purpose to limit excessive or overly large signs. The proposed sign is greater than the maximum square footage allowed in the commercial and industrial districts. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the variance request, VAR #90-28, to increase the area of an area identification sign from 24 sq. ft. to 94 sq. ft. However, staff acknowledges that the variance granted in 1981 to 56.83 sq. ft. is still valid, and the petitioner has the right to construct a sign at that square footage. �ppeals Commission Action The Appeals Commisison voted 2-1 to recommend denial of the request to the City Council, stating that the variance granted in 1981 was adequate signage. 10R Staff Report VAR #�0-28, 550 Osborne Road N.E., Health One Unity Hospital Page 5 City,Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Commission's action. VAR �90-28 Health One Unity N �/2 SEC. /l, T 30. R 24 21 I CITY OF FR/OLEY � ' . �►� 12 � � � �ON^ ,� � �.� �� V� �71 �• « T1r O'1 ? / � (* - "� C[NTfA � // � 13 �� L�CATION MAP I � 1 � � ,t (� �1 � j � F L ::� 1� � :J 1: �r Y � VAR �� 90-28 Health One Unity 10T WOODCR SCM( L AV� if ZONING MAP 3 I ! L 1 3 4 � � ! �` ./ .� S �� VAR 4i 90-28 Health One Unity � r r � � � � N � � � � ♦ `` �` z � V O S J 0 �- Z � � �� S �� SITE PLAN �� 9'-�.� VAR 4t90-28 Health One Unity � " CONSTRUCTION � � �: � � � �" i: � ` , � '. ALUMINUM .090 GA. CABINET 8Fi9NZE��P1E � '' � l�� = . ' • , F. ;� � ROUTEO OUT �AP ._B�A,►CKED WITH iNHITE LEXAN , �:_:J � ,�. �, ; ,.� : , 1 � REVEAI �i�l9�9@ SERIES METAL MICA - . ► . � : ��. � i ` ;: � : � � SHROUDING .090 ALUMINUM PAlNTEO MATHEVYS ; � � : : � 456-3t3E A1�ICUIC 8r1C�T�NE �� ' I EL�VQTION a O . ++ ; C� N� N� N � O , VAR ��90-28 HeaZth One Unity ,, . � �—� - � - - - - - - - ` ' ' •- C'-- - ----- _...--- 4 � � '-�.• , �! � ' � I �. � o � � y , ,i I � ! '' � i � �j ' i �' _ W i I v � •� .- . . .� ' / � : I � ---�---°- •-- -• -- --. . . . , / , / n� -+ E � � �- pC = Q �� o ; W �- H F" � � � � ... � H o a � � � " �� W a , � ' U � � W � � _ C ''� � � A � 7 � i ,� W � � « � , $ V - � �� i � � t � � ; o , � i � W w � M ( W C � I a x a ` • e � } I - - - - - - -�.�- � — �- --+ - � � � . ;� , � � 0 ,� ' � � I j� ;T�� ,`, �`' �`�1 � , � Y � ` 01 � O C v � E � _ 10 � i S , , �� m \a � °c 0 w c X W •` � ; , ;' 1 � k E , q m M '� J � « I � m a � C � O ; � - _ � y�� -/� -----• C-1c.--_•-•• ; � ; Z -_ _- a a a a « « � x o c ; t . � � � � « � �; 1* ., c � � « _ a � a � � E a 3 ; N = � � � 0 EXISTING SIGN A'Pr/1LS CC%!1.lISSIO:� tdEETING - i'ebruary I0, 19f31 Pa�� 3 t� r. l�arna statec3 Chat the chzracter or the land use is not bei.ng changed. 1• r, l:ci;�l:ur said th;�t, ii you look at why the Inte:im Corridor Regulati.onsl � ere estab]_i�hed, doing tt,i s to the cic>es not violate t}ie intent of thos 1 egul.aiior�,s. Vice Ch.li rwonan Gabel agreed with that a�id fel t that ' would r ot be dama�ing and it is a well tal:en care oi hcxae. Mr. Peter • said they r ould lil:c to start build:;.nq this spring, whcn the frost g out.. MOTION BY ls. Y.emper, seconcle@ by Mr. Barna, to close tbe public ing. UPOIJ A VO7CE �'QTi:, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE CiiAIRWOMItN G11I3E7. DECLARED PUBLIC II�ARING CLOSED ;,T 7;55 P.M. . IOTION by Mr. Kemper, seconded by Mr. Ba , that the Appeals Concnission re- ;ommend to the City Council, through e Planning Commission. approval. of the ►ariance to the I:�terim Developm Regulations for the Mississippi River :orridor Critical 1►rea, Secti G, 4, (B,2) to reduce to 70 feet the require- nent that in urbar: develo districts no structure or road shall be placed io less than 100 feet om the normal highwater marY. of the river, and no Less than 40 feet om the blufflines, to allow an existing dwelling to �nclose part an er.isting deck, on Lot 11, Block 5► Pearson's Craigway Estates S nd Addition, the s�.me bei na ?B��G Alden Way N.E ., Fridley , DII� 55432 . UPON ICE VUTE, kLL VOT�T.•3G AYE, VICc. CFiAIPEti:�i�u'1r7 GAS�L D�CLAr^.r.D Te�E vl(Yl'?ON CF ED U:dANIN:OUSLY. � / 2. RE9Ur�T FOR A�?P.RIA.�CE PLIRSU7'.DiT ?'O C::-PTr'R 214 OF THf: FP.I�7LT'Y �TTY COD_,, TO It�]Cl?E�SE Ti?L•' �OU�P.E FOOTIG!: C?F nId IDEi,TII'IC�'TTGN SIGti Tb:�'� 7'iit: AI.�_0�� 24 SO;;A?� F'��T TO 56.83 SQUAi`�E FEL?i ,'1'0 AJ.,T,C:'1 A I��;'� ID^\TIT'tCi�:? IC"1 SI��:] F'OF. U'IZY I:OS;>IT',L r LOCT,TED U\ �''�ItCi,L 6Q0 ,_ zta '�'Y:'r_'. P:v:t; :.' :'A�,? QL' .5'�C7.'ICt; I1, TiiL SAt•� B�Ii�� S�0 OSBOF,I:r.: kOND i�.L•'. (P.eqt:est by Ruvelson t� `.�;,so�i«:.e�, 4017 Cer_tral F.venue i�.L., Minneapolis, N,i1 �5921) . ;1cL�u�s _°.t�velsen, 40],7 Ceatral Avenue N.E.. was prasent. I�OT7C'? by '�.r. B�rn4', second�d b;� 2ir. .;:em��r, to oz�er_ +.l-�e Z�ubltc heari.ng. LTl?O:J A E'OICi. liOTE, F:LL V�Tl.]G AYE, VICi; CFiP.IRt�*•�71I] GABE?� DECL:�,):LD T'rIE Fi�BL�r tI�i�I:IG GL'i;h AT 7:57 P.M. Vice Chaiizeo�an G�i�el read the Staff R��ort: A1•SI;:ISTTtl�Tii�ti �'; ��. F I.EY�'t?'T 550 Ushornc l:0:�4 :�:. E. A. I'UI;IC Pt�i I'OST; 51:1'.\'I:D liY Fi:!1UTF.::�i;?:tT: Secti.oii ?.01.042, 2, required a ma�;i.mum sizc of t�.cnty-four squa:-e feeC for an "Arca Idcntif:icaCion" si��t in F-1 �oniuj;. Public l�urpos�� served by tl�is requirer,icut is to control visual pul'�ution and exces:;i��c usc of si�us in � res�.clential area. B. STA'CI:1� 11:1fiL�13 ] 1' : "lhlily 1!osrit�l r, c�uireci idcnt if i.c,it. ion; present sif;�i requir.c:� coml�l c�te rr�noclr.l.i�if,, c:�i::t ir,U :;i.�n an;l/cr. 1)I"J�)U:it.d �c�riedel af prrs_�n:: si�;n rc�r�Lir.es a v:.�riL111CC." PEN.S CnMMISSION MF13TItiG - Febru� 10, 1981 Page 4 /'.DI�ff.P�ISTR1iTIVE STAFF P.EVi:�W: 10Y The hospital is constzucted on property tltat is zoned R-1. The nature of develotunent along Osborne fn this area is rather commercial in a�ppearance. Thercfore, if tlie I3oard recommends approval of this rcquest, the staff has no stipulation to suggest. We are. working with the hospital on additional right-of-way along Madison, and are reviewing a long ranse plan for landscaping and development. M:. Ruvelson showed the co�ni::^i�n �hotoqranh� and �1id he was commissioned to c xne up with a sign for Unity Iiospital as ti�ey are unhappy with their present sLgn. He stated that whi].e obtaining a permit it was discovered that there w�s never a permit for the existing hospital sign. He said the hospital sign Mill be anodized bronzed aluminum (dark brown) with white lettering and the emergency sign will be completely replaced and made smaller using a blue face �nd arrow in that sign. At this time, Vice Chairh�oman Gabel reported that Fridley had a sign conuaittee to study signs in the area and it was felt that Tr.ity Hospital signs were "undersigned" and hard to identify and difficult to jind. She stated she drove by these signs before the meeting and the er�ergency :ign was badly obscured by another sign and the trees qrov�ing in front of it. ;he felt that the sign should be bigger. Mr. RuveZson said he will talk to l�nity about that but he really feZt the emergency sign should be scaled down :n terms of its relationship to the hospital sign. Mr. Kemper asked about .ighting and i•s. Rurelson said the emergency will have an arrow and will be �re11 Zit ar..d the hospital sign will be lit from the landscape area. Mr. Bar.na :elt t�►ai the sign by the entr_ance is displeasing an8 it is also confusiiig as :o where 1�ou shou3d turn ii�to the hospital. P•ir. Kemper stated that just :ha�iging this sign and mzking it a bit more Pleasing does not solve the �.�neryency siyn problem; it is a car.cern as it do�s not point to tne right 3irection. He further �tated that hc wou13 like Mr. Ruvelson to p3ss t]'.is iniorniation along. Vice Chairwoma?i Gabel a�ked how hich the sign would be and if the le�tering �.ill be any larger. r1r. RLVelson said they are not going to cliaiige the exist�ng basQ, the size will change just sliqhtly and the lettering ,vill not be any larqer. i;ice Chain:•oman Gab�l felt the pr.esent Iettering is ir�a3eauate and it should be largcr. tir. Ruveison felt if people are able to drive into the correct driviceray, tile si.ze of the sign should be adequate and he woulcl li.t;e to si:udy the size o£ the emergency �ign a bit further. Mr. J:oravetz s�ated that tlie Grea is rather coaunercial in nature although it is zoned R-1 and that the City is �•;orking o:ith Unzty al�out acqui.xing right of way of I•ladison St�eet. Fie said sign placenients are not going to interfere witli this and that the emergency sican i.s not an issve as iar as *_iie variance is concerned. t•fr.. Barn3 felt tl�e design for t}�e t�ospital sign is more pleasing and he has no objection to that. rir. F.uvelson stated that the present sign is about 55 square feet and they are asking for 56.53 square iect. iiOTION by rir. Kcmper, seconded by Mr. Barna, to close the public hearing. UPON A V�ICE l'OT�, A?.I� VUTIIvG A�'E, VICE CIIAIRtr'Or1AN GN3EL D�CLI�RED Tiii PUI3LIC H�ArING CLOSED AT 8:22 P.M. i�,p ►F;1►LS COt�fMISSI� ING - Februnry 10, 1981 Page 5 � 10Z MCCION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kemper, that the Appeals Commission re- cc mnend to the City Council, through the Planninq Commission, approval of the w riance to increase the square footaqe of an identification sign from the a]lowed 24 square feet to 56.83 square feet, to allow a new identification sign fcr Unity Hospital, located on Parcel 600, in the North Half of Section 11, tle same being 550 Osborne Road N.E., Fridley, MN 55432. UPON A VOICE VOTE� AI�L VOTING AYE, VICE CHAIRW�OMAN GABEL DECLARID TSE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. A IJC1[JRDII+�fENT: _ _._--- MITION by Mr. Barna, seconded by Mr. Kemper, to adjourn. UPON A VOICE VOTE, p;L V�OTING AYE� VICE CHAIFtWOMAN G1,B�L DECLARED THE APPEALS CO1�Il�lZSSION MCETING C? FEBRUARY 10, 1981• ADJOURNED AT 8:22 P.M. iespectfully submitted,� ,�,L',C' �l-�,r��l-L.-/."'� 7�eb Niznik, Recording Secretary •_r�_ . �__ :� •�tiri•� � �' ` Ms . S= ,ith stated ahe had � varia� �ce. The roof line i patio area, so there would Also, there are no objectic 10AA problem recommendinq approval of this already there because of the existinq iot be any chanqe in the siqht lines. �S from any of the neiqhbore. Dr. Vc �s stated there will. stil be of th�: petitioner's house and e furth :r from the qaraqe roof n thoug it the spirit of the Code fire �rotection, and he thouqht would recommend approval of the v Mr. Raechle concurred. 16 feet between the livinq space house to the east. Makinq a jog e does not make any sense. He s really more aesthetic and for �th of those were beinq met. He �lOTICN by Ms. Smith, seconded by D. Vos, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, AR #90-27, by Weldon Fenton, per S:ction 205. 07.03 . D. (2) .(aj of the rid2ey City Code, to reduce the �ide yard setback from 10 feet to 6 feet, to allow the encicsure of an existing porch on Lo 2, Block 6, Rice Creek Terr�ce Plat 6, the same being 640 - 67t Avenue N.E. IIPON 71 VOICE VOTB, �1LL VOTI�TG 71YS, CS-C871IRPBR80N 1COECHLE DECL7 �RED T88 I[OTION C71RRI8D �T11NI�[008LY. Ms. KcPherson stated this item will go to�the City Council on Nove� sber 19, 1990. 2. �`ONSTDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST VAR #90-28 BY HEALTIi QNE jJ�,TITY HOSPITAL: Per Section 214.09.O1.B of the Fridley City Code, to increase the square footage of an area identification siqn from 24 square feet to 94 square feet, to allow the construction of a new area identification siqn at 550 Osborne Road (complete legal description on file). Ms. McPherson stated the property is located just east of the intErsection of University Avenue and Osborne Road. It consists of iealth One Unity Hospital plus the Unity Professional Building loc�ted slightly to the west of the hospital complex. Ms. McPherson stated the property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwe:.Iing, as are the parcels to the west and south. There is CR- 1, �:eneral Office, to the east, and the City of Spring Lake Park is � :o the north . Ks. KcPherson stated the parcel has a history of siqn variances and also contains several types of signage including wall signs and various informational pylon siqns. Ms. McPherson stated that in 1974, the hospital applied for sign variances to increase the allowable square footaqe of delivery and �_:� �l�7 �B COI4IIBBI01� I�ETING. OCTOBER 30. 1990 pl►a$ 4 emerq+:ncy siqns from 6 eq. ft. to 24 aq. ft. and 75 sq. ft., respe�;tively. The Council denied the variance for the delivery siqns but did approve a variance for a 75 sq. ft. smerqency siqn. Ms. M:Pherson stated that in 1981, the hospital applied for a sign variaice to increase the area identification from 24 sq. ft. to 56.83 sq. ft., which . she believed was the current area identLfication sign. The�previous identification siqn was built withost a permit and was approximately 55 sq. ft. in area. Ms. ]IcPherson stated that in 1985, seven 8 foot free-standinq infoYmational eiqns were issued permits. In addition, the hospital also has siqns on each face of the canopy over the emerqency room entrance, 54 eq. ft. and 70 sq. ft. respectively. Ms. �! cPherson stated that in 1986, the hospital was qranted permits to rE:vise the facias on four pylon siqns which vary in area from 33 sc ;. ft. to 47 sq. ft. Ms. ScPherson stated Health One Unity Hospital fs requesting a vari��nce to construct a pylon identification sign to replace the exis•:ing identification sign. The proposed siqn would be 16 ft. tall and 94 sq. ft in area. The proposed area identification sign exce:ds the 80 sq. ft. maximum which is allowed in the industrial and :ommercial zoninq districts in the City. Ms. !�cPherson stated there are four conditions in the Sign Code, Section 214.21.02.A-D, that must be met prior to the Appeals Commission approving a sign variance. Section 214.21.02.A-D. allows variances from the literal provision of the Sign Code if four conditions are met by the petitioner: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and district. Unity Hospital is the only hospital located within the City of Fridley; however, it is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, and would be classified by the Zoning Code as an institution. Therefore, it would be similarly classified as churches, schools, and qovernmental agencies which would be required to conform to the siqns allowed under the R-1 district. The Code does allow institutional Biqns up to 32 eq. ft. in area, so the petitioner's request would be qreater than the maximum allcwed by Section 214.OS.06.A. of the Siqn Code. The only exception to this would be a hospital emerqency sign which could be a maximum of 100 eq. ft. in area (Section 214.05.06.C.). The purpose of the proposed sign is to provide 1 �� r • : i . _ c �1'1� i� : _ � ' � � - dentification of the hospital to the qeneral public, and not a�e an emerqency eiqn. B. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and district but which iB denied the property in question.'. 3y denyinq the variance, the Commission would not deny the �iqht for the hospital to have riqnaqe. The variance, which �ras qranted in 1981, is atill valid; and the hospital could �ave an area identification siqn of 56.83 sq. ft. C. That the strict application of the chapter would constitute a unnecessary hardship. Again, as the property was qranted a variance in 1981, strict application of the Siqn Code is creating an unnecessary hardship. It would limit the area of the siqn to only 24 sq. ft. In 1981, the City decided that 56.83 sq. ft. was reasonable. D. That the qranting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or qeneral welfare, or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district in which the property is located. By limiting the area of the proposed siqn, the Commission would be Berving the public purpose to Iimit excessive or overly large signs. Again, the proposed siqn is qreater than the maximum square footage allowed in the commercial and industrial districts. Ms. ZcPherson stated staff recommends that the Appeals Commission reconmend denial of the variance request to increase the area of an a-ea identification Bign from 24 eq. ft. to 94 sq. ft. However, as s:ated earlier, the variance that was qranted in i981 for 56.83 sq. ft. is still valid; and the petitioner has the right to construct a sign at that square footaqe. �IOTI�N by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr. Vos, to open the public hear ing. IIPOr !l VOICB VOTE, 11LL VOTING 11YE, VICE-CSl1ZRPBRBON 1CIIECHLE DBCI1lRED TH8 �OTIO�i C71RRI$D 71�iD TH8 PtTBLIC H8l�RINO OPB�T ]1T 8:00 P.I�t. Mr. 7ack Rreaqer, Director of Support Services for Health One Unity Hos��ital, stated that in 1981, they requested a variance to go to the present siqn size. Their business at that time was very 10DD �►PPEZ LB COIII�iI68ION l[EETIliG. OC.'TOBER 30, 1990 pAa$ 6 different than it is today. Today, somewhere in the neiqhborhood of 4i�$ of their business is out-patient business. They have had patiE nt and public response that they have driven by Health One Unit� Hospital. They have been Unity 8ospital, a aiember of the Hea11.h Central eystem, since 1981, but they are now Health One Unit;� Hospital, part of the Health One system. Mr. l:reager stated the proposed eiqnage is the adopted signaqe for the corporation. They have this same sign at their other inst.tutions at Mercy Medical Center, Coon Rapids; United Hospital Unit;►, in St. Paul; and ldetropolitan/Mt. Sinai, in downtown Minn��apolis. So, they are asking for the opportunity to have the same visibility as all their other hospitals. Mr. Kreaqer stated they do advertiBe Health �ne Unity Hospital, and :hey have ambulances throuqhout the community that say Health One. They have had occasion where a family has tried to follow an ambulance to the hospital and hasn't identified the hospital as iieal�h One, and they are tryinq to tie Health One and Unity Hospita2 together. Mr. Kreager stated he also wanted to point out that their present sign identifies them as a medical center, and Fridley Medical Center is on the corner near them which is a doctors' office buil3ing. They very much want to brinq to the public and the coma unity their new identity as Unity Hospital Health One. Mr. Kreager stated he wanted to emphasize that they are not really asking for a variance from 24 sq. ft. to 94 sq. ft. which is the way it appears. Their existinq siqn is 56.83 sq. ft. so they are really only askinq for a variance of approximately 37 sq. ft. Dr. Vos asked if the hospital could qet the wordinq "Health One Unify Hospital" on 56 sq. ft. of siqnaqe. Mr. Kreager stated, yes, they could qet the information on the sig��s. Whether or not they could qet the lettering larqe enough to l�e readily visible for people drivinq east and west on Osborne Roac� is the question. Ms. Smith asked if the hospital has looked at an alternative plan if � :he variance is denied. Mr. Rreaqer stated they have not looked at any alternatives at this tim:, because they are tryinq to standardize to the signaqe of all the Health One hospitals. Mr. Rreaqer stated they have received permission to install this ide�tical eiqn at Health One Mercy 8ospital in Anoka County, altiough the zoninq is not R-1, as it is in Fridley. He stated the� are servinq an aginq population, and they want to make Health 10EE �PPBa LB CO1�Q[IBBION ItEETI�G. OCTOHER 30. 1990 p�a$ 7 One U iity Hospital visible to their elderly patients and to do what they :an to ease their entrance and identification to the hospital. MOTIC �1 by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the public heari ng . IIP0�1 !1 VOICB VOTE, 71LL �OTING 11YB, VIC$-CH7IIRPBRBOZi EQBCHLE DECLiI RED TSB IIOTIOIT C7IRRISD 11ND T8E PIIHLIC HSARINO CLOBBD 7►T 8:10 P.M. Dr. tos stated it is obvious that 24 sq. ft. is not realistic for this kind of operation, so some type of variance is necessary. He statEd he had some hesitance to qo up to 94 sq. ft. That size of siqn would overpower the neighborhood, and there are already a lot of s:gns in the area. If the hospital was in a commercial zone, it w��uld be allowed to have an 80 sq. ft. siqn. He thouqht the prob: em with the existinq identification sign is more in the height than in the size. If it is put on a pylon, it will be more visil�le. He is willing to recommend approval of a variance, but he i:, uncertain as to how larqe a variance to approve. Ms. ;�mith stated she hesitated to recommend approval of a larger sign than it is now. She thought the 56.83 sq. ft. sign serves the �ublic interest and would be more visible on a pylon. She stat�:d she thought the variance at 56.83 sq. ft. is acceptable and adeqiate. She stated she would recommend denial of the variance requ� :st . Mr. Kuechle stated he concurred with Ms. Smith in that there is alreidy a variance in place of 56.83 sq. ft. There are already a lot �f siqns in the area, alonq with a larqe emergency Biqn. If the iospital was in a commercial district, it would be allowed an 80 sq. ft. siqn. However, the hospital is not in a commercial district and, qiven the four conditions which must be met in order to r:commend approval of the variance, he could not rationalize the need for that larqe a variance. MOTI�N by Ms. Smith, Beconded by Mr. Kuechle, to recommend to City Coun �il denial of variance request, VAR �90-28, by Health One Unity HosFital, per Section 214.09.OZ.B of the Fridley City Code, to increase the square footaqe of an area identification eign from 24 square feet to 94 square feet, to allow the construction of a new area identification siqn at 550 Osborne Road. IIPOr ]1 VOIC$ VOTB, Z oOTING �YE, 1 VOTING lilllY, VICB-CHAIRPERSON �OEC HLE D8CLI�RE TH$ l[OTION Cl�RRIBD BY ]1 VOT$ OF Z-l. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on November 19, 1990. � t unroF FRlDLEY C011/1ML[NITY DEVELQPMENT' DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM riAT$: November 14, 1990 /3�-� � To: William Burns, City Manager �� FROM: BIIHJE CT: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Variance Request, VAR #90-29, by Dennis Garner � oFF Attached is the staff report for the above request. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to ti:e City Council with the following stipulation: 1. The property owner sha11 siqn and record against the property an aqreement statinq he understands that the deck can never be enclosed. Stafi recommends that the City Council deny the variance request as tie petitioner has a second location for the barbecue, and a 3 foot wide deck would provide access to the upper level of the home. SB:1: M-90- 786 � � C�N �F STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE october 30, ls90 PLA[�NG COMuMSSION DATE 10GG FRIDLEY CITY COI�IqL DATE tlavember 19, 1990 ,�T� �` � IREQUEST PERMIT NUME �ER APPLICANT PROPOSED F EQUEST I LOCATION � I SITE D�.TA I SIZE I �ENSITY PRESENT ZO VING ADJACENT L AND USES 8► ZONIN( � UTUTES PARK DEDIC �TION ANALY.�IS FINANCtAL 1� RPUCATIONS CONFORMA VCE TO COMPRE �ENSNE PLAN COMPAT�IL ITY WRH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG ENVIRONME NTAL CON: IDERATIONS STAFF RE( �OMMEI�ATION APPEALS F ECOMMENDATION PLANNING �OMMISSION R =COMMENDATION 10HH Stafi Report VAR �90-29, 7119 Ashton Avenue N.E., Dennis Garner Page 2 A. PUBLIC PURPOSE SERVED BY REQUIREMENT: Section 205.04.06.A.(3) requires that unenclosed decks and porches may not extend more than three feet into any required side yard, provided they do not extend nearer than five feet to any lot line. Public purpose served by this requirement is to grovide space between individual structures to reduce the possibility of fire, to provide access to the rear yard for emergencies, and to limit the condition of crowding in the residential neighborhood. B. STATED HARDSHIP: "Immediate to French doors - 6' elevation variance to ground - fire exit from kitchen - dining area - access to back yard to avoid going through basement - acceptable to neighbors' view - usable for casual use" C. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner, Dennis Garner, is requesting that a variance be granted to increase the encroacha�ent of an unenclosed deck into the side yard from 3 feet to 8 feet. The request is for 7119 Ashton Avenue N.E. Site A single family dwelling unit with an attached garage is located on the site. The parcel is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the parcels to the north and south. The parcel is adjacent to the Burlington Northern Railroad. An approximate 6 foot change in topography occurs west to east across the parcel. Analysis The petitioner has already constructed the unenclosed deck which encroaches into the side yard by 8 feet. The petitioner constructed the deck in order to replace an existing deck which did not encroach into the side yard and was in need of repair. The deck is adjacent to the kitchen area and is currently being used by the petitioner for the family barbecue and may also be used as a second fire exit should the need 1011 Staf:' Report VAR �90-29, 7119 Ashton Avenue N.E., Dennis Garner Page 3 arise. In addition, the deck provides access from the second floor kitchen area to the lower level of the yard; it allows for the 6 foot change in topography of the lot. The petitioner has a second patio area located on the lower level to the rear of the dwelling unit. Requiring the petitioner to reduce the size of the deck from 8 feet to 3 feet would still provide adequate room for the barbecue as well as provide a fire exit. In addition, the deck as constructed is only 3 feet from the adjacent southerly neighbor's garage roof which may pose a fire hazard for either the petitioner or his neighbor to the south. The adjacent garage has been constructed with no openings in the rear wall, which would allow it to be rated at a one hour fire rating. The petitioner has submitted two alternatives for smaller decks, one at 4 feet and the other at 6 feet wide. The petitioner would prefer the larger of the two, but both alternatives still require a variance (see attached drawing). Recommendation As the petitioner has a second alternative to provide area for the family barbecue, and the Code allows a deck of 3 feet which would allow access to and from the kitchen area, mitigating the 6 foot change in topography, staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the variance request, VAR #90-29, to increase the encroachment of an unenclosed deck into the side yard from 3 feet to 8 feet. However, if the Appeals Commission chooses to approve the variance request, staff recommends that the petitioner sign and record against the parcel an agreement stating that he understands that the deck can never be enclosed. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the variance request to the City Council with the following stipulation: 1. The property owner shall sign and record against the property an agreement stating he understands that the deck can never be enclosed. City Council Recommendation The petitioner has a second location for the family barbecue, and a 3 foot wide deck would still provide access to the upper level of the house. Staff recommends that the City Council deny the variance as proposed. � �� 1 VAR �f yU-"Ly Dennis Garner 10JJ � j � �� i f� �� w I� � � � � Qa i�a� � �� _� Z�NING MAP �O, OF T. 30, R. 2 4 FR/OLEY �8,. ,' . �/ �� 2. / � .7 '• .� :;� ..: � r�. , a F �� a I N ` _ _ �j a A r ��';� .._- r. t' ` .: ! :f.: . _ :+ R/J :R- �- � y ,W04 0'" � . �MAN r '": W� � 'v �� ¢ . � N ! I � '`� r . °'.' �✓�awooe MANOl9 --�3 �'yaz ioN's 9 9 ey� y� �: 'b� l i.� I�� „ l r .J T-, i✓' i! ERq4CE . ��_ s � 'n � � l i j::� RE t�1S£D . ;--- ;--- ------� �-- ; ,:.. '_��- __ —__ . �--. ,4,11, u71QtRS; -: �,--�-'— - �_.c� _; -- I r- -- ---�-�°� _— '�---, ----j�-- __'. �_ _�Y1ZY�GG�SL�-- ' �_ I�r�•- r . _ __ � /� --� �--� - L-- �--q�Lt—,7? : _---� �� _� �_ — �,r__-_' _ �_��.--� ---1%, �` - - � .-- ---- --.-T-r-r---- /� .-1, ri- �------ � I . �.�� - � - - ,� t\ . -, � � ; ,; ,.� i' � -� � � i � �� r __�r'__`_ �� \\ I/ AA `y� � :• �: 'T ; •_�ti__ ___� ✓ i' `�,� a��,��. ' L '� r.' �'��'�'�' _—_.� �,�, , . 'r. � -�ir�-�---- � �.. ��4. i , 1 -i • -+-: ��; _.-.i _:.i_.= �1,. j f .� � ,i. - � �- ��r,--+---�. � i , ,.,.�y - _`^ r- '-�.'�---t--'�� i. . �. -� �- _ti;{s=T-_-7�:i�' � %.� " .� �J L.._ I 1 ! 1 i � ' \ ' _, � •. -f!' L � • _ 1 � � ,;,;,'� _� .;u ). —^�---�-1—! �r'•' -- i,'` I 8 \ �� 43 [�] VAR 1�90-29 Dennis Garner 41 � r�ns �s . c i � ! rMt. ��r[�� nv tM[ •r+or. I OiFKEi �iiECi!rvG �NF ��t• ' lrxS W�w�tiG �S r0 �E ti:ro c �Eff/fNCi �u�rOSES AND f1rt fl' IS r/O� RES►ONS:NE �00 •CCUR�C�ES M[R[IN COaTI 539/O ; ISA � 7�) /� f I - P P� � r-�,: -,-- I i � „ 1�} �Cv' SSR1p , � . _, ' � _I � ; (n� I �.: � � .� �i , - ; I I ', �.__� � �, � I� .-.t ��N : . , � _, . .: . 8�" a� ,. � �' g �, :; � r � ';i> I :i I � ; �'r � � I � --r±- :••10T5 PlA"EO a I;�. .' �-•• � NpN.ARD 0 NUS� � � — I I � OI i i �l `i � �:� � � I � � I f.f [o�.vE� SEC. �O LOCATlON MAP d '� �� 0 z �' ., � y t�+ ap wi O � � r� F 'n 4.,► � !; � •r N �+ � ` a W � � � � � � � i � v� a � := o � � � z W z d � r � � � � � � > � � WJ d w L W E.^�+ � V. � V � O a � ��4 7 c�,9 � � v v � Z �� cY.� �' pn W � .� •`s� y .� �� y= � $ v� {,U � r � � E-� a w ,h � � � � 7 � T � � � i - }_ : 1 � ��t'� � ., �+� �l o- _ �} �� '� . l 1 VAR #90-29 Dennis Garner � ' � 1 1) , ' �t � ''' ;l v °;f t• - . �i , `� . , _.� � � `�� i '� Y - ---� ---- � � � •./ j ! .� . / � l �i� r� O`J-� i� r ,,. --��?� '--' i . ` L�- � y�� \ • � i� � �� ;,� � , ' �. T � � a 10LL . .. .;� � � c7 � +� a� '7 `^ U � i ..� �•. �L G) 07 ' : {., •.� :� �—+ �«. �U c� ' V O �i :i. •-� !� C.� C. C� cn r� •r� ►.�- �, . y bi, .,^,�•c;• .[ C� Cti C'v r� � V ►: r-t �li :,�'�l � � \! .�• � r� ctl �+� .-� � �•�'7'� O Qt'+-� •O •s� � nc,.,� �a�:�� :. ;.; . p�+n��r, a � •z .� c: .: • v .� � ^. •y � :�=;:��:��'�; C� � :a7 !� 4 I - (,': .... .' L' �. 1 , 1-� '� • �� .� :L E? �� :. � � •�- r. �� " Q; ^ .`. ' i.: .. . . � ��l � . � �� 1 -: .: `: C.) •. Z: , <� •„ �� v o • . n:.c..�� .i �.:.�. �:,^ c: C! u: u c • :0 Q� T7 > '�i � ►� V � y.) � •.i i'Y ;� r"` • � .,� �.., r� J 0� .r: - fr bD.� N r-+ �0 r U [ ' ' � �'3 a' r-1 •.t /�� ii •.� ♦; � Y " H � � i ..! cn [ � , : •r+ :7 Q1 •.+ , . ►::1 "� �� C ' � v •.-� .:. :: .mc�c��u�� r�.:.,..��•� � � x .. r.,p tD �.� � U �> C. • � � O .: O :. :. C1 � r-1 •.� � O O L. � OD r+ cs �.� hp N i+ Ci � • v �. •.� ,-, ro � �o a� -{ �c s. � ► .n s.. �o � c� + .�•� a�aar� � n A t� N'b � r«a 1 1 r q c�} i. � p CJ f*: •ra i: 1 � r i: .3 v �j [—� � r1 � �S�i +�� i:;1. � :� Q1 ^. � ►.� � , ••� H � CD ' O O f� � U ry � � c� � � v .�-� —1 • J � r1 .� �-1 0 7 • � 1: W� .Z .+ h O .� 'b 1 �. `�� ti � • `� '_. .__ `.l1 ._"'_. _.. . .... .. SITE PLAN o�,rL •, �e��e 3' '�� VAR �190-29 Dennis Garner 10MM � �C / �- �-ee�1�, /�tz�fC'�ec� 7-0 �o cc-�1-� �de o .� J�a�r.�s'�. �� 7�� sLt1�t fr�e ��- •' � / � � > / �2- �� ti �/ �P�� /� � ��C �Z`t Tt� =�,��C�_ o �,C' .�z� �/� 9 ��- � �e rt/�'. `^ — _,t �� .�� 11 � �,t10 ti , � � � ,,� ., a � �� ' T°�,i' ��l��h x �� t�,� ,�,� s ��GP by ,.,�,� � a Rt �J ��Q �� ZX �� ''d rn e PA � �t � �eCl� �s �/ev��e� ��%Yirr�afe�y (o� �-� ��o�e, c r a�h� -- L� �� a�a'�e� � � 2"X �" �DQ�e.. �� U ��2�t-�r'e. 1 To �r � rrt e o� ��use c�--� c� �!� r�9%t�- , /,, � � „� �.'' �� 1 �� 5� �-.�a �e�/ �� y �' X � , ille �e � �y c� v2r�/ Z. ' . � �r , d � � se t � � yrar�� ( ce h� �� f � r� �e�et�' d nd �ac��/e ll�c�^ �� To� � y'�tck SviCe 1 � �v/ C� �7�'� "fPl�'S T� �rd �h � LI S/ n� %77Q�'.�[ L L+d hq�.0 l�/ld�i� c r1 a� 20 :►��,�0 Se�'-�-a�" e�// ct-r��►•c e�w t� ?o Pd c.(� C;'� 2i^ c�,? d To u�r icj %-fi 5f�t�o-t�s . �ctober 28, 1990 City oP l�idley: 10NN We have no objections to the location and style oY Mr. Garners deck. ?t does not obstruct cur view and it looks like a nice addition to the praperty. In fact it afYords aur patio area more privacy. 7115 ashton Ave. N. E. October 28, 1990 City of Fridley: We have no objections to Mr. Garners Deck. It looks vei'y nice and is a nice addition to the hause. It is nice�y designed and from ou=' vie� it seems like a natural addition ihich affords ttie Garners privacy. 7109 Ashton Ave. N. E. �J 1.., � ;,,1:.��.- � 1 • � � Y�Y _ / . .I_ - , C �J�� • _ � � � nnveTns��amTnt� pg +�QT�u(�$ �90-29. BY DENI�IS G1�►itNER: rVL ViYJ.Il�La1 - Per Section 205.04.06.A.(3) of the Fridley City Code, to increase the area an unenclosed deck can extend into the eide yard from 3 feet to 8 feet, to allow the construction of an unenclosed deck, on Lot 6, Block 2, Hillcrest Addition, the same beinq 7119 ABhton Avenue N.E. l�is. KcPherson Btated the property is zoned R-1, Sinqle Family Dwel:.inq, as are the parcels to the north, Bouth, and west. The prop�:rty abuts the Burlinqton Northern riqht-of-way on the east. Ms. dcPherson etated the petitioner has already constructed the deck which extends 8 feet into the side yard and replaced an exis:ing deck which only extended the allowed 3 feet into the side yard in the 6ame location. The deck iB adjacent to the kitchen area and is used by the petitioner for the family barbecue and coul i be used as a second fire exit and provides a means of qetting from the kitchen area on the second floor to the lower level of the back yard. There is approximately a 6 foot drop west to east along the �etitioner's property. Ms. KcPherson stated the petitioner does have a Becond patio area whicl is located on the lower level to the rear of the house. Ms. !�cPherson stated the Zoninq Code requires that a deck can only extend 3 feet into the side yard. A 3 foot wide deck would still prov ide room for the petitioner to exit the kitchen area, would still allow the transition between the kitchen and the lower Ievel, and could still accommodate a barbecue qrill. Ms. McPherson stated that on the lot to the south is a two car garzge which has been constructed within Code at 3 feet from the lot line. That garaqe was constructed with no openings which allow it t.o be rated at a one hour fire ratinq. The petitioner's deck as constructed is only 3 feet from this adjacent qarage. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has submitted two alternatives for smaller decks. Both of the alternatives would require var:.ances; however, the variances would not be as qreat as the one pro��osed. One alternative is to construct a 4 ft. x 12 ft. deck in �:he same location. The other alternative is to construct a 6 ft. x 12 ft. deck in the same location. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner does have an alternative for a r� :creational space for the family barbecue, even thought it would not be as convenient. The Code also allows a deck of 3 feet which wou�d serve the purposes of the petitioner. For these reasons, the sta°f recommends the Appeals Commission recommend denial of the var �ance request to increase the encroachment of an uner►closed deck int� the side yard from 3 feet to 8 feet. However, if the Appeals Comnission chooses to recommend approval, staff r�commends the followinq stipulation: 10PP h� � � x - - • • , � - - : � ��h� i� - ' ' _ � 1. The petitioner siqn and record aqainet the parcel an aqreement statinq that he underBtands that the deck can never be enclosed. Mr. J;uechle asked if there is any Fire Code requlations about barbECUe qrills on wooden decks. l�s. ] IcPherson etated she �did not know but could check into that befo�e the City Council meeting. Ms. �[cPherson Btated the petitioner did submit two letters from adjac:ent neighbors stating they had no objection to the variance. MOTIt� by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to receive into the reco:�d letters dated October 28, 1990, from Michael Corbett, 7115 Asht�,n Avenue, and Wes Garcia, 7109 Ashton Avenue, etating they have no objection to the variance as proposed. IIPON A VOICB VOT$, 11LL VOTING 71Y8, VICS-CiilllxPSR80N E08CHL8 DECL �RED TH$ l[OTION C7IRRIED DNI�TI�tOII6LY. �OTI �.i by Dr. Vos, Beconded by Ms. Smith, to open the public hear ing. DPON !l VOICS VOTB, 71LL VOTING 7►Y8, VICE-CB�IRP$RBON 1COECHLE DECL ARED T88 l[OTIOI�i C7IRRIED AND THB PIIBLIC HBARING OPBN !1T 8 s 25 P.M. Mr. Garner stated he is not the homeowner, but the renter of 7119 Ashton Avenue. He stated he has a siqned document qranting pernission to build the new deck. He stated he was unaware of the Codf requirements when he built the deck; and, apparently, there was a complaint which brought this to the attention of Darrel Cla�k, Chief Building Official. He stated he would like to keep the deck as proposed, but if it ie impossible to do that, he will tea�� it down and rebuild it. Mr. Garner stated he has received only qood comments from his nei��hbors, that it provides a qood view and affords more immediate pri��acy to the adjacent neiqhbor. He stated he is willinq to con:orm to whatever the City decides. He etated if he is required to �:ear down the deck and rebuild it, he would appreciate it if the wor� could be delayed until spring. Ms. McPherson stated that if the Commission recommends denial, etaFf would recommend that the Commission make that a stipulation. ��,Q�i by Ms. Smith, Beconded by Dr. Vos, to cloee the public hea rinq. 10QC� �. i . , �_ _ � ._`r y = , � � : � IIPO�T � oOICE oOTE, �LL 90TI�a �?E, OZCE-CB11IitPE�80iT �IIECHLE DECL7 3tED TSE l[OTIOM C�RRIED 71WD '� BIISLIC 8E71RIiiG CLOSED I1T 8: 35 P.l[. l�is�. l'uechle Btated he has looked at the property, and he be2ieved anyo��e would agree that the deck with the enclosure is an impr� rvement over what the old deck. It looks qood and fits in well with the house. He stated he wished the petitioner had built the deck at 6 feet rather than 8 feet, but he could not see a real stro��g reason to require him to cut off 2 feet. Mr. l:uechle etated that even thouqh he ie qenerally quite reluctant to q: �ant a variance after the fact, in this case he would recommend appr�val of the variance. Ms. �mith stated her only concern is the proximity of the deck to the adjacent qarage. If there is no fire hazard, then there shouLdn't be a problem. She aqreed with Mr. Kuechle that she also did not like to approve variances after the fact; however, the peti �ioner did not intentionally build the deck without a variance, and �he would be inclined to recommend approval. Dr. �os stated this is a very narrow lot, and the deck looks like it js out of variance. His only concern is also the distance betw�en the deck and the neiqhbor's qaraqe. A 6 foot wide deck wou13 still look close, and it would be a lot of work to tear it down and cut off 2 feet. The neighboring garage is at a different elevation, and there are no sight lines to be obstructed. There is a hiqh fence on the eouth side to b2ock off the view. He, too, did not like qrantinq variances after the fact, but he thought he could live with the variance as proposed. �O �0�1 by Dr. Vos, Beconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend to City Cour cil approval of variance request, VAR #90-29, by Dennis Garner, per Section 205.04.06.A.(3) of the Fridley City Code, to increase the area an unenclosed deck can extend into the Bide yard from 3 feet to 8 feet, to allow the construction of an unenclosed deck, on ]�ot 6, Block 2, Hillcrest Addition, the same being 7119 Ashton Averue N.E., with the following stipulation: 1. The owner of the property sign and record aqainst the parcel an aqreement stating that the owner understands that the deck can never be enclosed. II801 � 11 VOICB VOT$ � �I.L VOTI'iG �YE � VIC$-CHAIRPER80bT 1CQBCHLE DECI �1R8D THB l[OTIO�T C7lRRIED II)illiT2l[OIIBLY. Ms. McPherson stated this item will qo to City Council on November 19, 1990. � � c�nroF F�� Cal1/tMLiNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMOR.ANDUM DATE: November 15, 1990 � �� Tp; William Burns, City Manager �� FROM� Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator Lisa Campb�l]�'�Ianninq 7►ssocfate BIIBJ' :CT : ran :. Reauest Metropolitan Council Residential Recycling Bins' Grant Application The �ity of Fridley intends to apply for $22,130.00 in grant funds froa the Metropolitan Council Residential Recycling Bins' grant func. The qrant application is attached for your review. This grart will assist the City in the distribution of 7,661 sets of containers to the same number of households in 199I. Please recall that in order to take advantage of the $5.00 per household funds ava: lable in 1990 from Anoka County, staff has developed a strategy whe�e the purchase of the containers is split over two funding per:ods. This is outlined below: .990 purchase 3,235 sets for $33,000 => Anoka County Grant Delay delivery and distribution until 1991. L991 purchase 4,426 sets for $45,145.20 => $22�13Cou c M1 t _> $23,015.20 SWAP Fee �1 Thi � funding scenario is significantly different from the scenarios reviewed to date. We had oriqinally intended to apply for $38,000 ($F.00 x 7,661) but the Metropo2itan Council qrant funds may not be used for the 3,235 sets purchased in 1990. The qrant request of $22,130 represents $5.00 per 4,426 households, which is the nu�ber of households remaining after the 1990 purchase cf 3,235 se1 s in 1991. S� ff Recommendation St�iff recommends that the City Council act to authorize the City Ma� iager to execute the grant application. The deadline for the ap�lication is November 26, 1990. LC:ls M-90-820 ��a IV. R�SIDENTIAL RECYCLING BINS GRANT APPLICATION �_ : • y . �t� ..�- �r , k• �1�� . . ,� � _ �;.�� • �• = �• �� - ; � � l. Nane of Project SpOASOr: Citv of FBIDV�Y Mailj nq adC�t655: 643 1 IIniversitv venue p F - -- Fridle9. MN 55432 COtuity Anoka Z. IR� Tax-Exempt Number: 80303ot 3. Pr�ject director name: Lisa Ca�vbell Titl:: Rec9clinQ Coordinator Phorle: 572-3�94 �ddr3BS: Same as abov� - 4. l�u thorized Otficial name: W' iiias � RLTng _ Titl B: itv Manaaer Ph011e: 572-35(11 �ddZBSS: Same as abov - 5 . PF OFOSAL SUl�II�1ARY iriefly summarize the major benefita, goals and activities :ssociated with the project as well as the percentage of j�ost-consumer and other r�cycled materials contained in the l�ins and any �conomic incentive the municipality offers to :�esident who recycle. The City of ?ridley intends to purchase 4,426 sets of containers, in order to complete a citywide distribution of residential recyclin� containers to residentia dwellings of one to four units. The major benefit of this project is that it will assist the City in meeting State mandated abatement goals. The City of Fridley conducted a piZot project for residential recycling containers during the :uIInner of 1989. Roughly, 200 sets of containers were distributed to two areasin the City. Pre and post container participation was tracked in both areas. The presence of containers resulted in a 30-40% increase in participation. Based on th:s pilot project the practical benefits of the proposed project are in- creased par�icipation and increased tonnage abatement. The anticipated increase in particip�.tion is a thirty percent increase from 40% to 70% during the first year and up to 90% by the end date of the project. We anticipate that 1,044 additional :ons will be abated by the end date of the project. Because the City has already conducted a pilot project we are restricted to the use of the :ontainer system already present in the City. This is a two crate sys- tem; one fo: cans and one for glass, with newspaper in paper bags and cardboard placed in tzree feet by three feet bundles. These containers are made from 50% post consum�r high density polyethylene plastic. The containers will hold 25% of the material to be recycled. This request does not include the containers already 6. Pimount of Grant Request (up to $5.00 per hhldj Pimount oi Local Cash Match (at least 50�) TOTAL GRANT COST other Project Costs TOT1riL PROJECT COST 9 g22,�30.00 S 23.0� sas,��5.20 S 19.5_ $64,708.46 11B distributed during the pilot project. In the City cf Fridley the refuse haulers operate in an open market. Each �ousehold cortracts individually with one of the seven haulers operating in the City. All oi the refuse haulers offer low volume fees as an economic incentive to recycle. 9a 11C , c � ; . _�1! ' �� i � x .� � i� :• • ; • BE IT �:ERTIFIED THAT: 1) cic� of Fridie� will act as the (Project Sponsor) sponso- and qrantee for the landfill abatement Residential Recycl�nq Bins qrant durinq the period from 2) Februar I 1990 ' (:stimated start date-qrant execution date) througi 3) Februar 1 1994 (estimated end date-three years from execution date) 4) W�llias W Burns, Citp �anaAer (Name and title of authorized official) is hereby authorized to submit a qrant proposal nnd request funding for this project to the Metropolitan Council and to execute such aqreements and prepare documents as necessary to accept funds and implement �the project on behalf of the Project Sponsc r. This certification certifies the followinq: 1. Tte Project Sponsor is an eligfble applicar►t for the ResidEntial Recyclinq Bins Grant Proqram. 2. Tte project will turther the goals of the Metropolitan Counc:l's a^�� Taste Manaaement Develo�ment Guide/P�icY Plan. 3. T1.e project is in conformance with the approved ,�olid Waste a a�ment Master Plan for the county in which the project will occur 4. Tl�e Project Sponsor agrees to comply with all applicable laws relat;.nq to nondiscrimination and affirmative action. 5. Tl�e Project Sponsor will provide all local and state permits, licen,;es and authorizations necessary tor the project. 6. T1ie Project Sponsor is current in all tax obliqations to local state or federal governments. 7. A:knowledqment will be made for the Council ior its qrant assis:ance on all promotional materials, reports and publications relat�nq to the project durinq the qrant period. 8. Tie Project Sponsor will provide all documentation and repor:s required by the Counci2 durinq the qrant period. 9. TZe proposal is complete and all information provided in the propo�al is true and accurate. I HEP�BY CERTIFY: 5i - (Date formally approved) 6) (Siqrature oi Author zed Official) (Date) Willias W- Burns, City Manager (Siq�,ature of Project Director) (Date) Lisa Ca�pbell, Secycling Coordinator 10 11D Residentisl Recyclinq Bins Grant Proqram conditions may chanqe. The Metrcpolitan Council reserves the riqht to amend the Residential Recyclinq 8ins Grant Proqram Guidelines and Applicatjon Materia2s. Addition��l information may be requested regarding the application and, i! ��rant iunds are awarded, the project activities. �►lso, Council :taff may neqotiate items contained in the appZication or recommeni conditions under which a grant would be recommended. CI �9 �*��►TIOIi I��9IIT THE pROJEC'� 1. 11Le:s �ill th� proj�ct activiti�s ocaur? Provide the names of counties or municipalities in the Metropolitan Area that will be directly affected by the bin purchases. The pr�ject activity will be confined to the City of Fridley, in the County of Anoka and the State of Minnesota. Z. Rhat is th• approsimat� Qate o! acquisition o! the rssids�,tial r�cyclinq bins? Residential Recyclinq Bins Grants wi11 b�: monitored for three years from qrant aqreement execution date. BINS MUST BE IN USE WITHIN THREE MONTiiS OF EXECUTION DATE. (100$ >f qrant funds will be remitted to the qrantee vithin 15 workin� days of execution of the grant aqreement or 15 working days Frior to a certified delivery date of the residential recycling bins, gh;chever is later.) Februa-y 15, 1990 3. H��r Yill tD� Sesidentfal x�cycling Hins Proj�ct b� publi:isod? A number of promotion and publicity techniques can be us:d to inform the qenerators to be served about the proqress and rssults of the project, to share information with others who may want to replicate the activities or to provide decision- makezs with information. SHOU]�D A GRANT BE �WARDED, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL GRANT FLTNDS MUST SE At ;IINOWLEDGED ON I►LL PUBLICITY. A ne� program brochure will be mailed to residents in conjunction with the distribution of containers. An article is planned for the City Newsletter. News coverage in the FBIDLBY FOCIIS, a POST PIIBLICATIOH is likely. A sejarate letter from the Council is being considered. 11 4. �� Rh�t ar� th� ujor qoals o! th� pr�j� als The Residsntial R�cyclinq Bins Grant Program 9 specific, saasurable and indicate the impact they solid waste abatement in the Metropolitan l�irea. should be will have on Goals should include the type and number of r�sidential rscycling bins t� be purchased, potential abatement results, crsation of new �arkats or txpansion of �xistfng markets, qenerators to be s�rvec and other infor�nat.ion pQrtinsnt to ths projact. �) �at u� th� antiaipat�d or proj�at�d laadliil �bat�m�nt �•aults Lroa th� pzopos�Q proj�at? These results 4hould be msasurable and included on the report iorn►s to th� Council. List each saterial (such as: aluminum, qlass nawepaper, yard waste, oiiice paper, corruqated cardboard, etc.) and the estimated amount (in sither tons or cubic yards) that �rill be abated as a result ot the residential recyclinq bin purch; �ses . ;;xample: Purchase (specific type, includinq � of post- �;onsumer and other recycled materials) residential recycling '�ins to collect � tons of (specific recyclable �naterial(s)), serve _� residential qenerators in _� nunicipalities, �tc. 11E Each �oal should be a clearly stated, single idea. Vaque and unmea3urable qoals should be avoided. Do not simply list activities as the qoals oi your project. A) Tle major goals of the project are to increase participation a�d abatement tonnage. The anticipated increase is an increase of 30 -407, from 407 to 70 or 80' during the first year of the p•oject. Anticipated participation by the end date of the p-oject is 90'. For anticipated tonnage levels see B) below. B) Tie anticipated additional tonnage is 1,044 tons by the end d3te of the project. Anticipated material tonnage: Newsprint/Corrugated 753 tons Cardboard Glass Cans 12 188 tons 74 tons 11F DI S�D 4��"�rTnt� �OQT TA� PROJBCT BPONBOR 1. D�,�crib� th� proj�ct �ponsor. !or �zampl�• is th� proj�ct spoaso;� sor• than on� �unioipality, and �►Dat i• th� total popula�:ion a!l�ct�d? Count ies) ci� ��f Fridlev Municipality(ies) in snota population 29 000 Z. D rcrib� th� proj�ct sponsor�s pa�t and aurr�nt �zp�ri�nce ia proj�ct �anaq�ment, iacludinq pr�vious �zperi�nc• ia sup�rvis nq staft �ad taaaqinq contracts or qrants. The Ci:y of Fridley's Commu��iaY1Dsteofpsome ofpthesengrantsfplease managei several grants. F see Ap �endiz B 3. D�scrib• hov tb• proj�at sponsor Mill sdminist�r and manaqe the p��oject. Examples of past projects may be attached to this propo: �al . The project will be implemented in the first quarter of 1991. The purchase and distribution of containers will be completed by March 31, 1991 4. D�scrib• tD• proj�ct spoasor�s past and curr�nt �sperf�nc• ia landlill abat�meat. The City of Fridley has operated a drop-off recycling center since 1979, a curbside recycling program since 1985 and a yard waste compost/transfer site since 1985. S. ::s an �aonomio ina�ntiv� oil�r�d to r�sid�ats �ho r�cpcl�? I! p��s, pl�as• d�sczib�. The seven refuse haulers operating in the City of Fridley offer low volume fees. � 15 11G •. pr�par• a x�sid�ntiai R�cyclinq Bins arant wor]c proqram. The wozk proqram should describe the activities anT�tssks that will t�ke place durinq the grant project period. informrtion may be shown in a chart lorm. At a MINIMUM, the work proqrar IDust identify the activities and tasks, the psrson or positicn assiqned, and a timetable (month) for the completion of the acl,ivity/task. THE W4RK PROGRAM CAN ONLY BE CHANGED BY MUTUAL AGREEMEam be omesEpart ofLthe Gran�t AqreementN �WARDED. The wo: �k proq ACTIVI"Y/TASK �ERSON/POS?TION �'�MpT.ETION TIME Purch3se Containers, Lisa Campbell, 12/90 ' 2/9� Rec. Coord. DistYibute Containers, Contractor, Yet to be determined. Develop New Brochure, Lisa Campbell, Print ing, Mail brochures Super Cycle, INC. Lisa Campbell, 1/91 1/91 - 2/91 2/91 Purcl.ase Replacement Containers, Lisa Campbell, On going* Dist•ibute Replacement Containers, Judy Melham, UtClerk BOnlgoing� * To �e financed with utility billing revenue. 14 11H 5. Each project sponsor will be requfred to complete and submit a writt,en annual report and final narrative raport. l� form will be pro��ided !or the annual report. It will address achievement of goa:.s as listed in question �4. To a�a;�ur• and �vsluat• th� proj�ct, pi�as• d�sarib� th� follow.nq: Hov �ill th� proj�ct sponsoz aeasur• proqr�ss in ��•tin� tb• stat�d qoals? Rhat r�cords or oth�r u�thod� viil be d�v�lo��Q aad us�d to �upport aa0 docu'ent th� r�sult• o! the propos�d proj�ct? Rhat tpp�s o! on-qoinq �valuation �ill bo used to d�t�rmin� th� succ�ss of th� proj�at? The pr>ject sponsor will com^are participation rates for precontainer and po>tcontainer�o determir_2if the presence of the containers is result�ng in the anticipated 30-40Z increase in participation. The pr�ject sponsor will compare tonnage rates for precontainer and postcoltainer to determine if the presence of containers is resuZting the annual increases need to reach 1,044 additional tons anticipated for the project period. Contr,�ctor invoices and veight slips will be used to docusent house'�old counts/participation rates and tonnage rates 6. lhat perc�nt o! r�cpc2�Q sstsrials are contaia�d fn the r�sitential r�ayclinq bins? Twenty-Five percent are contained in the bins. 7. ;>�scrib� tb• rol• ot any bcard a�b�rs, committ��s, or voluit��rs that •iil b� iavolv�d in aonauctinq th� proj�at or provldinq ov�rsiqht. The City of Fridley's Environmental Quality and Energy Ccmmission will monitor project performance. This is a seven- member citizen advisory commission. For a Complete list of tte members seeAppendiz A. 13 6. List th• �mplop��s, stalt positions, aoasultants or thira partp k�p iadividuals that �ill b� r�aponsibl� ior aospl�tion oi tD� proj�ct rorr proqra�a, iaaluainq �bo �ill D� r�spon�ibl• tor pr�parinS �ritt�n tinanaial and proqr�ss r�ports. Resumes with referencES or position descriptions of key individuals must be attached, Willias i. Burns, City Manager, AutLorized Official Lisa Cas��bell, xecycling Coordinator Barbara )acy, Ylanning Coordinator and is�ediate supervisor of Bec. Coord. For :esu=es see attachsents under Appendiz C 8) jNFt ►R�aTIOZT 11B�QT BROJECT FIN�►I�iCEB 1. Res.dential A�cyclinq eins arant proi�ct budqat. Al2 project �ponsor; are required to use the budqet format provided below. The bud�et must show how the grant funds and cash match will be used for the purchase of residential recyclinq bins. Total Project �udaet Item Cost Residertial Recyclinq Bin Purchases $45,I45.20 Freigh' : Applic►ble Taxes sus- roTAL The fc j�ut a� Local Match Cash $23,015.20 Res. Recycling Bins Grant $22,130.00 $ 45,ib5.20 $23,015.20 Salar; .es/trinqes $12,488 .08 Contr�cted Labor $ 3,82S.t8 PrintLnq S 1,750.00 EquiF /Mach. Rent/Lease Otha� Projsct cos $ ��soo.00 SU 3-TOTAL To rAL $ 19,563.26 S 64,708.46 S Q P►nticipated Project Revenues, it any S 16 $22,130.00 111 2. Zt� lssa Pro j�ct Costs Project 3ponsors m included in the li items at per unit BUd_ �� ust provide detail ior ne item budget. Detail cost, number oi hours 17 each budget item would include number of at hourly rate, stc. . �, • � 11J 11K 3 . Cast l[atchiaq Tunas : Source • source ot lunds (insl�gcurede�allocatedanpendinq. number); l�„mount = S. Status �t_ ,gource �'� City of Fridley Qtility $illiag Bevenue pending Swap Pea* $23,015.20 4. Prcj�ct costs aot cov�r�d by th� x�sia�atial A�cycling Bins araat. �ource City o: Fridley Planni�.g Budget City o` Fridley IIti2it� BilZing , �� . _ � $12,488.08 3,825. 18 us Secured Pending Super ;ycle, Inc 1,750.00 Allocated/ secured ' City o E Fridley IItilit� Billing 1,500.00 pending g. l,) Alt�r th� �inimum thr�� y�== p�rioa usaq• ot th� r�sid��ntial r�cycliaq bias, ia continuation o! th� proj�ct antic;.patea?� If so, please explain how the project will be funde�l beyond the qrant period. Yes 3) 1�hat aourc�s o! lunds �rill th� proj�ct spoasor uae �or aontisuation o! th� laadtili abst�ment activiti�s? The utility billing revenue anticipated from the Swap fee will be used to purchase replace- ment containers. Tiis fee does not udermine the economic incentive to recycle p-ovided by the Iow volume fees offered by the City's refuse hiulers. The cost to the resident under any other approach oE providing recycling services would be an additional $3.00 -$5.00 per month rather than the 83 ce ts the Cit s r sing. s. '�o iilustrat� linanaial assistana�a boM�t ��A�sia�atisl �� qrsn; assistana� i• b�inq rsqu�st�a sa R�ay:iinq Bins orant �ill �nabl• th� proj�at aativiti�• to occur, or iE th�y �ould aot otb�rvis• b� possibi�. See page 18a I* 5olid Waste Abate�ent Prograsaing Fee, Proposed Bffective Date 1/1/91 18 t� �� ,Cffi�t�2�1'�8 Tp '�'�t� ]1PPLIC]1TI0 Proposa..s MUST BE SUBMZTTED ACCORDZNG to the FORMAT provided in the app.ication materials provided above. �►dditional �pace for respons�:s may be added. Before cubmittinq an agplication ior the Residential Recyclinq Bins gr�nt proqram, be sure the followinq items are completed and attache i : o Grant Proposal Cover.Sheet; o Project Sponsor's Certitication; o Resumes with references of key staff or consultants; o Responses to questions listed under "Infozmation About tre Project Sponsor", "Information About the Projectn, and "Information About the Project's Finances"; o A Marketinq Plan; o Letters verifyinq all sources ot matchinq iunds; o Two or more bids, or certification of one applicable ve ndor ; and o Other appropriate information. V. MARI�E'I'Il�1G PLAN A�sid.:�tial Aocyalinq Bias qrant proposals aust inalud• a 1[arket .nq Blan. The fo'�lowinq questions (as applicable) are provided as a quidelLne for completinq your Marketinq Plan. A previously prepar:d plan may be submitted. FJ�CH 0 F THE FOLIAWING ITEMS MUST BE ADDRESSED: i. Hor vill th• bias r�ach th� consua�r/q�n�rator3 �;ontracted labor vill delivery a set to each household. Z. 1R at ar• th• costs assoaiat�d rith distributioa2 $6,622.00 3. 1I'tat is th� budq�t �or sdv�rtisinq aad prosotioa? p2,750.00 11L �. H�►� �ill tb� ooll�at�d r�cpciabl• �at�rials s�aab th� �nd �rk��: ana b� r�cyal�d? ��r� riil th� sat�rials b� aark�t�d and �O �� r�sponsibi• !or aazk�tfaq tD�a? The City's cnrbside recycling proviier vill resove the �aterials fro� the containers on collection days �nd delivery the� to �artet for sale and recycling. S• ��a� u• t�• pr� •iV�s thOi�uiltLds? •i Th s n faoYr�a� on i s aat�rlal• and �ho proprietary. Super Cycle, Inc. receives the revenues fro� the �arteted satezials VI�R-P RB 19 11M Bnviron�ental Quality and $nergy Costissioa Heabers Nov �mber 14 , 1990 Paul Dahlberg, Chair Bradley Sielaff, Vice Chair Dean Saba, Member Rich Svanda, Member Steven Stark, Member Brtce Bondow, Member Su:an Price, Member 11N Sose of the Grants Ad�inistered by the Co��unity Develop�ent Departaent, since 1987 The Departnent of Public Services Community Energy Council Grant Fiscal Yea� 1987 $15,000 Metropolit;.n CounciZ Public Information and Education Grant June 1, 19 c7 to May 3 1, 1988 $10,000 Community )evelopment Block Grants 1987 -90 $300,000 Anoka County Solid Waste Abatement Joint Powers Agreements 1987-90 $]80,000 �es of Rey Individuals gesponsible for �anaging Grant Willian W. Barns, City �anager, Authorized Official Lisa Caspbell, xecycling Coordiaator and Projec[ Manager Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator and Becycling Coordinator's I�sediate Supervisor 110 �Iyt.I�lt M . �S 11P PERSOI�I.: 1Wdr� �s: �l�F hone : ZpOC71TI0N Doct� �z oi Philosophy - poli.tical Sciancs, 1973 1Csnt Stats Uniwrsity, �t, Ohio Mast �z o! l►rts - Political Sci�uca, 1967 wst Virqiai• �aiwzsity, ibrqsatovn► M�st Virqiais Hach �lor o! 7►rts - Political Scisac� , 1964 Diest Virqinia Meslayan Coll�qe, �uckhaanon. 1Mst Virqin�a gUl�Q�lARY C F REId11'ID �� 198' to 1988 GITf! 0� 1[2DDLE1'OMa. OSIO t poptiLtion � . 000 ) 197 ; to 1985 197 3 to 1976 19� 7 to 1970 19 i5 to 1967 COl�p�EN: ATION City Ma:s+�qsz CI'!'Y 0! T71Iir801�M • OSZ� (popu3,,�tion 30,000) . Gity M+�9�= �7►IIS71S S?7►TE UaNl�SIZ'Y 3tat� Oaivsssity, l►rlcansas 1►saiatant psot�asor MLSTMIIdIST%R COLLDGE �w Ni]�inqtoA. 8ennsylvania Iastructez l�R1rORD C00lITY SOARD Og ID�GTZON �sl Aiz. Nai'Ylard public School T�achaz !t� . Dursu ssports ti�st hia last salarY vitis ths City ot Middlato�nx, 02 io vras 563,000 pas y�ar vith • i�00 p�r ioath auto allo+rance. l�U►ME: JOB TITLEs CITY: pOPUSATIOD : NUI'lSER OF F�IPIAYEES : BUDGE'I' : SERVICES :'R�VIDEDs UTILITIES REpORTZNG REIaTIONSHZP: ppMp71MTIVL D11TA Millian M. �usn� City Maaa9�= riiddlata►n. Ohio 44,000 515 =45 Million lull-sarvic� City Matez and S�vsr A,eport�d dir�ct2y to th� City posissian. ?ha City Co�aisaioa bas fiw M�b�rs •l�ct,�d at-las�q� tor tw�c-y�as' o'wrlappiaq t�tas • �, • .._..---� - - ...« .. _. �. _. . .�_ . ... Q 11Q �� - Wi 11 ian► W. Burns Addr�ss - • 11R 0 �� >orn - Ma rc h 21 , 1942 Fa�ily � Married with thr�e childr�n Educatior Kent State Univ�rsity, Kent, Ohio, Ph.D. in Political Science �ith consid�rabl� cours• r+ork and diss�rtation in publ ic ac ministration � O�c�n�b�r 1973. West Vircinia University� Morqantown� Ml�st Virpinia� MA in Folitica: Science, Aupust 1967. We�t Vircinia W�sleyan Coll�q�� Huckhannon, Ml�st Vir9inia� BA in Polit:cal Sci�nc�, Jun• 1964. Hanover F'ublic Schools� Nanov�r� Pa.� praduat�d in Jun• 1960. E�p 1 oy�� t Octob�� , ,98� - January 1996 Tit,• and rl�c• - City Manaqer, City ot Middl�tow�, 1 Cit�� Centr• Plaza, Middletown, Ohio 45042 put ,�s - Provid�d Tanaq�n�ent tor full-s�rvic• city of 44,��00 people. Responsibl� fo� financial •anaQ�w�nt. col,�ctiv� barqaininq� personn�l administration, prowth man�gQment, �conomic dev�lopment and capital improv�- mQn:s planning and implementation. Acc �plish��nts in Middl�town 1. 2. S. 4. tev�rs�d a badly deterioratinq financial situatio� :hrough wid• variety oi tinancial and •tfici�ncy- ��lated adjustm�nts. 3ucc�ssfully dir�ct�d th� n�qotiation ot t�n iiff�rent labor contracts within quid�lines s�t by th• Commission. ;onducted a compr�hensive r�vi�+ of the Polic• )�partment� iTpl�mfnt�d nua��rous i�provtTe�ts. 4ttract�d otfice t�nants to City a+n�d �aal l� in- :r�ased �all traftic by �aor� than 1000 p�rsons p�r i.y. Paqe 1 �,I�-�.�,.�,e'--'"�.-�-+�;•F'.• , � . . .:,; . . . . . ,rJ•� . • � : � � f 1 t � ! S. '�epotiat�d a new cable trsnchis� aqr��ent. Aupust 1/7� - Octob�r 1�3 Titt• and riac• - City Msnap�r� City of Fairborn, 44 W. Heb�l• Avenu�, Fairborn, Ohio 433Z4 11S Dutl�s - Provid�d �anaq�n�ent fo� a tull-s�rvic! city of 50,�00 p�opl�. Responsibl• for tinancial a�anaq�a�nt, coil�ctiv barqaininp� p�rso�n�l administration� qror+th Tanig�ment, economic d�velop�nent and capital improv�- �►er+ts planninq and in�plementat3on. . , Acc awpl ish��ts in Fairborn 1. Annexed n�ore tha�n 800 acr�� of propQrty alonq I-67S. 2. Set up a��QSSn�nt districts and built approxfmat�ly iour mil�s of larqe diam�t�r wattr and sewer lin�� in Fairborn'z s�ction oi the I-673 co�ridor. '�. Was instrumtntal in the establish�n�nt of a 224 acr� office/industrial park. 4. Acquired CDHG proj�ct qrants; p�ovid�d fo� stre�t improv�a��nts and housinq rehabilitation in tw�nty block tarqet a��a. g. Reconstructed about 2.S �ail<s of thr�• and four lan� streets in four hiqhly conq�st�d a��as. b. Introduced •n annual MBO propram� a�nua2 capital improv�ments planninq and productivity m�asur��nt proqrsms. 7. Ma�intained stronq tiscal n�anaqem�nt th�t k�pt Fairborn financially h�althy on a D�droo�n community tax bas�. 1973 - 1976 Ti�l• and Plac� - A�sistant Prof��sor oi Political Sc�ence, Arkansas Stat� Unfv�rsity, Stat� Univtrsity, Arcansas 72467 Du ti�s - T�a�chinq courses in Aa►�rican municipal qov�rn- n►e,t, public administration, th� An��rican l�qislative pr�cess� Amoricin political parti�� and U.S. governm�nt. 1967 - 1970 � s � n Titl• and Pl�c• - Instructor in Political Sci�nce, W�st- � minister Colleqe, N�w Wilminqton, Fa. ! f D�ti�s - Toaching cours�s in public administratio�, U.S. ; qcvernment, comparativ� qoverna�nt and state and locsl � qc v�rnmtn t . 19bS - 1967 T:tl• and Plac• - Public school t�acher in Aberd�n, . Paqe 2 F� � Mar�land. E�ploy�d by Narford County Board of Education, 8el Air, Maryla�d. 11T Prai�ssion�l Associalions Th� Int�rnatiortal City Mar►aq��nt Association Th� Ohio City Manaq��+�nt Association Th� Montqomery County Mayors and Msnaq�rs Association Th� Dayton Ar�a Manaq�n��nt Association (Pr�sidMt Oclober 1993 to S�pt�mb�r 1964) Co�unil y Orpanis�tlons MicdlQtown Rotary First Presbyt�rian Church of Middl�tow�, Ohio Micdletown Community Foundation Board ot Trust��s Mic�dletow� Chamber ot Comn►erc• Hoard of Directors Pa9e 3 i i , � � ; s : � 11U ELIZABETH A. CAMPBELL 3221 GARFIELD AVENUE SOUTH, �3 1�IINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612/825-8521 OH.TBCTIVE: A position in Government or Business which will allow me to utilize my strong skills in the areas of program planning, implementation, and coordination. BDMMi �RY: * Proven record of accomplishment in all areas of program/ project management. * Demonstrated ability to work effectively within an organization as well as with outside agencies. * Skilled in working with the general public to provide information and handle complaints. * Unique ability to remain sensitive to individual's needs while still meeting program objectives. * Known for being able to learn new tasks and responsibilities quickly and thoroughly. * Possess excellent oral and written communication skills, including the planning and conducting of public presentations. * Thorough knowledge of municipal government including contract procedures with businesses and other agencies. ACHIEVEMENTB: * Developed and implemented the City of Fridley's long term solid waste abatement strategy. * Developed and implemented a procedure for the City of Fridley which reduced the notification process for zoninq code noncompliance from 60 days to 15 days and from 5 notices to 2 notices. * Designed and implemented a system for the City of Minneapolis which reduced the backlog of clients for job seeking services by more than one-half. * Developed a model letter system for Minneapolis Council- member Kathy O'Brien which resulted in the significant reduction of staff time and effort. * Recognized by the City of Minneapolis for outstanding service whi2e working with the Civil Rights Department. CAMPBE7 ,L, ELIZABETH A. EBPSRI: �NCE : PAGE 2 � 1v * City of Fridley (MN) 1987 - present Planning Associate/Solid Waste Abatement Coordinator (promotion) Planninq Associate/Code Enforcement Officer 1986 - 1987 ' t Inc Minnetonka, I+IId * Med-Care Associa es, ., Admission Coordinator � City of Minneapolis/Civil Rights Department Equal opportunities Aide/Contract Compliance (pramotion) Employment Specialist � University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinics, Minneapolis, l�t Emergency Room Nursinq Assistant �� Minneapolis Councilmember Kathy O'Brien Assistant ► Miscellaneous jobs while attending school EDUCA CION: * * 1985 - 1986 1983 - 1986 1984 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1rIId June 1985 B.S. deqree in Urban Studies Concentrations in Economics and Speech- Communications Completed six week Contract Compliance Program based on the federal EEOC laws and guidelines Other areas of continuing education include such topics as Public/Private Partnerships, Municipal Economic Development, and Grant Writing AFFI: ,LIATIONS : * Vice Chair, Anoka County Solid Waste Advisory * Member, Anoka County Solid Waste Advisory Tas Promotion and Education Subcommittee * Member, Association of Recycling Managers Task Force k Force, HARBA tA J . DACY 9 Home: (61Z) 529-460111 235 OltiC�t (612) 572-35l1 LD 1 Vli1LLEY . 1�T 554 2 2 NING COORDINATOR: � � 10/88 to Present Community Development Department, City of Fridley, Minnesota (pop. 29, OC 0) - Administers and.supervises implementation of city land use controls, comprehensive planninq process, and development plan review process. - Responsible for direction of six employees in the Planning Division, including an Assistant Planner, Code Enforcement Officer, Recycling Coordinator, Section 8 Housing Specialist, and two secretaries. - Assists HRA Executive Director in preparinq reports and plans for housinq and economic redevelopment projects as well as tax increment financinq proposals. � Member of LRT Land Use Coordination Task Force for the Metropolitan Council. Administers land acquisition process in the city's Community Development Block Grant proqram. �,ITY PLANNER: 8/84 - 9/88 Plarning Department, City of Chanhassen, Minnesota (pop. 9,000) - Administered and supervised implementation of city land use controls, comprehensive planning process, and development review process. - Responsible for direction of Assistant City Planner and staff support services to the City Couneals pand �the Commission, Board of Adjustments and App , Housing and Redevelopment Authority. - Transportation Advisory Committee member and Transportation Systems Planning Committee Chairperson to Metropolitan Council. - Administered Community Development Block Grant program. ��N PLANNER I: 4/82 - 7/84 Plazning Department, City of Palm Bay, Florida (pop. 40,000) - Prepared and presented staff reports for the Planning and Zoning Board, Board of Adjustments and Appeals, and City Council. BlrRB! RA J . Dl1CY �359 IINITY 71V8I�iU� NOR'� GOLDi N VALLEY. lQT 55422 URBA2' PLANNER I: 4/82 - 7/84 (Continued) � 8oa�s (612) 529-�601 1 �X Otfia�s (61Z) 572-3591 PAGE 2 Revised and updated the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Revised addressing system. gj�� fING AID: 9/81 to 3/82 Depa�tment of Community Development, City of Brooklyn Park, Minnasota (pop. 46,000) INTEtN• 9/79 - 6/80 St. :�aul Department of Planninq and Economic Development, St. Paul, Minn asota :.� • MAST�R OF ARTS IN URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES: 9/80 to 3/83 Graduate Proqram Public Service Fellow Urban and Regional Studies Institute, Mankato, Minnesota Mankato State University BACHELOR OF ARTS, POLITICAL SCIENCE: 9/78 to 5/80 Hamline University, St. Paul, Minnesota MA�7CR IN PUBLIC SERVICE: 9/76 to 5/78 Pennsylvania State University, Altoona Campus, Altoona, Pennsylvania REF$R8NCE8 William Burns, City Manager Cit� of Fridley 6437 University Avenue N.E. Fric ley, � 55432 (61:) 572-3500 Don Ashworth, City Manaqer Cit; of Chanhassen P.O. Box 147 Cha� �hassen, 1rIIJ 55317 (61: ) 937-1900 Ricl�ard Diamond, City Manager Cit� � of Palm Bay 214' � Palm Bay Road N. E. Pal, i Bay, FL 32905 (40') 727-7100 .� � cinroF F�� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT' DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM D71TB: November 14., 1990 �' TO: William Burns, City Manager �i'- FROM: Jock Robertson, Community Development Director Barbara Dacy, Planninq Coordinator Steven Barg, Planninq Assistant BIIBJE :T: ack round Nuisance Abatement/6740 Overton Drive N.E. Durin � the past 2 l, violations at the occasions. Several sol id waste in the Drule nski, has been solic waste storage 12 '2 years, I have responded to and observed code above referenced address on seven separate of these have involved materials and unsecured driveway area. The property owner, Ms. Wnita made aware of the regulations for appropriate and disposal many times. On O�:tober 10, 1990, I responded to a complaint and observed numeY ous bags of qarbage strewn across that portion of the driveway located directly in front of the garage. A reinspection on October 29, .990, revealed that unsecured solid waste remained on this site, and a citation was sent to Ms. Drulenski for violation of City Code 113. On October 30, 1990, I sent a letter (copy attached) informing Ms. DrulEnski that if she did not correct the violation within ten days, I would pursue abatement of this public nuisance in acco��dance with City Code 110.04. An inspection on November 13, 1990, revealed that minor progress has been made but four bags of garb�,ge, at least one of which was clearly open, remained in the driv�:way area. This constitutes a potential health and safety haza:•d to the neighborhood since it could attract rodents and does crea•:e an unsanitary environment. e o� imendation Staf` recommends that the City Council authorize abatement of this publLc nuisance in accordance with the provisions of City Code 110. Unde- this ordinance, the City can contract for removal and bill the � �roperty owner for the removal cost plus 25$ for aclminfstrative expelses. If not paid, this amount is assessed aqainst the prop :rty. SB:l� M-90-809 � � CITYOF FRIDLEY 12A FRIDLEI' Ml'11( 'IP.aL CE�TER • t►a� I l'11�'ERSITI' .4�'E. h.E. FRIDLEY, M^ SS�3_' •(612) 571-3450 • FAX �61' i 5' I- I'_r7 Octobe: � 3 0, 19 9 0 Wnita 1►rulenski 6740 0� �erton Drive N. E. Fridle; �, 1�1 55432 RE: U��lawful Storage of Solid Waste at 6740 Overton Drive N.E. Dear M:. Drulenski: On Octcber 9, 1990, I sent you a letter concerning unsecured solid waste iirectly in front of the qarage at the above referenced addres:. A reinspection on October 22, 1990, revealed that the probler still existed, and I sent you a citation for this violation on Oct>ber 29, 1990. Another inspection on October 29, 1990, revealEd continued noncompliance. Please review the enclosed copy of Fridley City Code 110 which addres:es public nuisances. In accordance with the provisions outlinEd in 110.03 and 110.04, this letter shall serve notice that you ha�e ten days in which to abate this nuisance. If this unsecuzed solid waste (that which is not stored in secured contairers) is observed on an inspection to be conducted on or shortl� after November 12, 1990, I will request that the City Counci] authorize abatement of this nuisance in accordance with City Cc de 110. 04 . Please call me if you have questions or wish to discuss this furthe2 . Sincerely, Steven Barg Plannir� Assistant SB:ls C-90-936 r L'� � � �� FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL November 19, 1990 T e of _icense: By_ CHRISTMAi TREES Bob's Pr>duce Robt. Schroer 7620 Unirersity Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Menard's Charles Seeger 5351 Cen;ral Ave. N.E. Fridley, P�1N 55432 CIGARETTI (RETAIL� E.River ld. 'fexaco Donald Kisch 8100 E. i iver Rd. Fridley, MN 55432 FOOD ESTfBLISHMENT E. River Rd. Texaco Donald Kisch 8100 E. Fiver Rd. Fridley, HN 55432 ITINERANT FOOD PERMIT . St.Willians Church Dolores Steinert 6151 Univ�rsity Ave. iJ.E. Fridley, �N 55432 OFF SALE iEER E.River Ri. Texaco Donald Kisch 8100 E. R ver Rd. Fridley, ,1N 55432 RETAI t GA �OL I P�E E. River I,d. Texaco Donald Kisch 8100 E.Ri� er Rd. Fridley, IN 55432 CHRISTMAS fREES Patrick No�ney Tree Farm P.Nooney 1034='N. Sh �re Dr. Menomonie,dI 54751 Approved By: Richard Larson Fire Inspector LICENSES �s Fees: $200.00 (Deposit) �100.00 Richard Larson $200.00 Fire Inspector (Deposit) $100.00 James P. Hill $12.00 Public Safety Director Richard Larson Fire Inspector Richard Larson Fire Inspector $35.00 Asking Fees to be waive� �60.00 $60.00 $200.00 (Deposit) $100.00 �� -oF �vcv FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICENSES �3A8 SERVIC$8 A-A�ron's, Div. of Waste Inc. 251] Highway 7 CLYDE WILEY Exce lsior, I�IIJ 55331 Phyllis Bakkelu�id Bldg/Mech Insp A B:nder & Son, Inc. 222 Hardman North So :t Paul, MN 55075 Bro<�klyn Air Heating & A/C 580: Lyndale Avenue N Bro� �klyn Center, NIId 55430 C & M Heating 12 9' ' 0 Arrowood Lane Day� :on, MN 55327 Richard Binder Michael Glynn Craig Dalbec Hea�:ing & Cooling Two Inc. 929► Zachary Lane Map.e Grove, MN 55369 Wayne Sinkie GEN sRAL CONTRACTOR . Add �tions Plus 431i Shady Oak Road Minietonka, MN 55343 Jack Holsather Imparial Siding & Remodeling Co. ili) Adams Street N.E. Minleapolis, NIId 55413 Michael Morgan KimLinger Construction 695) Brooklyn Blvd Bra�klyn Center, MN 55429 Skyaay Quality Homes 8025 Garfield Street N.E. Spr ing Lake Park, NII+T 55432 Tinbercraft Enterprises 217 SW Old Highway 8 Ne� Brighton, MN 55112 8Ep TING A Einder & Son Inc. 22� Hardman North So St Paul, MN 55075 Pete Kimlinger Robert Shimanski Peter Muelowski Richard Binder Same Same Same Same 16A DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same Same CLYDE WILEY Bldg/Mech Insp ' Broo::lyn Air Heating & A/C �� 5801 Lyndale Avenue North �� Broo::lyn Center, MN 55430 C & : Z Heating & A/C 1297) Arrowood Lane Dayt�n, MN 55327 Michael Glynn Heating & Cooling Two, Inc. 9290 Zachary Lane No. Mapl a Grove, NIId 55369 � MAB� NRY Advanced Concrete Construction 448 Lilac Street Anol+a, MN 55014 PLIII� BING Bea�er Plumbing 204:5 Jackson Street N.E. Ced� r, MN 55011 Joyc :e Plumbing Inc. 434; Oakdale Avenue S Edi� �a, 1rIld 55424 Bro� in, Loren L Plumbing RR _, BoX 38 Delino, MN 55328 McGiire & Sons Plbg & Htg 605 South 12th Avenue Hop cins, MN 55343 Craig Dalbec Wayne Sinkie Rene Goertz Bob Paulno Robert Joyce Loren Brown Thomas McGuire QuaLity 1 Plumbing & Remodeling 11033 Terrace Road NE Blaine, MN 55434 Dean Ciccone J. Scott Plumbing 21]2 Highland Avenue St. Paul, MN 55119 S. Jochim Suima, Frank Plumbing Co. 11:6 Rockstone Lane Ne� Brighton, MN 551i2 Frank Surma GrE:gg Werner Plumbing 11! �Ol - 65th Place Ma� ►le Grove, I�i 55369 Gregg Werner 16B Same Same Same DARREL CLP,RK Chief Bldg Ofcl STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN Same Same Same Same Same Same � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICBN8E8 1 6C i NoVember 19, 1990 ' l�l � OWNER LOCATION OF BUILDING UNITS FEE Johr Morrissey 1601 N. Innsbruck Dr. 1601 N. Innsbruck Dr. #204 Unit. 250 & 350 Frid ley, MN 55432 James & Debbie Cox 1601 N. Innsbruck Dr. 1287 Ingerson Rd. Unit 273 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Andr�w Kociscak 1631 Rice Creek Rd. 585 E. Co. Rd. B2 Little Canada, MN Lang-Nelson Associates 155-175 Satellite Ln. 4601 Excelsior Blvd. #650 Mpls, MN 55416 Andr:w Kociscak 5131-35 3rd St. 585 �. Co. Rd. B2 LittLe Canada, MN Rich�rd Kappes 5370 4th St. 3129 Webster Ave. Mpls, MN 55416 Stev: & Diane Heinecke 5365-67 5th St. 4748 5th St. Colu:ibia Hts, MN 55421 Gary Knutson 14-16 62nd Way 6321 Riverview Terr. Frid.ey, MN 55432 2 24.00 1 12.00 1 18.00 33 91.00 2 36.00 2 36.00 2 12.00 2 36.00 APPROV]D BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR � i� cm oF FRII LEY FOR CONCIIRRENCE HY THE CITY COIINCIL �tOVBILBBR 19, 1990 Wa:bon Lawn Maintenance 32:5 Skycroft Drive St l�lnthony, I�i 55428 17 EBTIMATEB Corridor Maintenance Project No. 219 ?I�171L E8TI1v1TE: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5, 942.85 HN' CB 67)0 France Avenue South Su Lte 260 Mi ineapolis, 1�1 55435 Inspection of the 1.5 MG Elevated Water Reservoir Project No. 202 Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. (PDM) P.�. Box 1596 Des Moines, IA 50306 1,326.60 Construction of the 1.5 MG Water Reservoir Project No. 201 Estimate No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 254, 915.87 _ r,r_� . -- - _ ___ . - _ . .. - . _ , . , . . . _ . -. t�..�• '• .�; J �,.;; . .J, �.� . -_ _ � s . '�� . • `: crn oc Fu�► n�tc re�cs �� . �ui wt�sm w� N.e. � FtI1LiY � NIrESOTA �i132 FROM: City of Fri/ ey Ea'ineeria, Ii�isim T0: Nonor�lle N��ar snd City Co�ncil City of Fril,er �13! Unirers,tr Rvenue M.E. f�i/ley, Nii�esoti SS43T DAiE: IfOVEfIBEk 14, 1991 COAfl:QQR MAI"ITENAIlC� PROJECT t !94 STATEI�NT OF MORK 17A �Ee E�ti�te No.7 IFINALI hried 1f-15-91 to 11-tS-91 FOR; MAI.BQN LMp�I MAINTE�tAN 3Z25 SKYCROFi DRIVE ST. (kllH�(p9 1l�I. S34l8 E�TI!SA?ED UNIT �UANTITY TNIS TOTAL CCNT .AC' ITE!! QJANTIiY PRIC� UIIT ESTIM�TE 10TAL I�IOl1NT lf�intenartce Servi��s 1.11 32,l8l.N LUMP SUM f.143 i 32,l88.l0 TOTAL---------- �-------------�w____------______�____�______��__�____��-------------------------f32�811.11 s 0 t su�!naar: Oriqinil Cont� itt Mount � Contr�ct Aldi ionz Con!r�ct Oedu tiors Revised Ccntr ct A�oun! Va?ue Cocplet d Te O�te A�a�nt P.etain � Ta aat� (8;1 less Aso�n'. P i' P�evio�sir C;'!�UNT DL'E :H � E�T:!!5?E ��FTi-:Cn?E �' ?i?� CC,NiRACT�9 17B :3?,e�e.ee so.ee :e. ee :�2, eee. ee s32,808.@8 :e.ae f26,a57.?5 i�,94?.85 t he�e;,y ce�! fy tha! the »erk perforted and the �a:eria!s supplied !o "ate under the teres of th•e contract far thi5 pre;ec:, ar.d i!i �uLheri:ed :hanges thereto, ha�e in u tlil r�I�e ur.de� the cant►act nf the a�oun:s sho�n on this est:�a`.e (anc the f:��l quarti!ies o^ the final est:tate a.•e correct), and tAat this estita!E is j�st ar.� :orrect ar:d no pirt � ths "i�cu^t ��e This �eate" has bees re:eired. sY _ s�: .'�_ ---�� ---��-- - -- Date __ I_� __I -� ' C, �, Cartt ±c�'s ku hcrized Re �esen!a:ive ljitle! P CERTIFI:AIE I� THE ENSINE:R I Aereby ceriifr th�t I hive prep�red or exa�ined this esti�ate, �nd th�t the contractor is entitled to pzy�ent of this esti�i±e undir the co�tr�ct for referertte pro;ect. CITY OF FRIaIEY� [NSPECTOR / � _ .� �__ — - � , �� Chetked By - - ' - _� . . .- ; � . : -it�� . : - t:� ;: . . ' . � �� 5 ' �l 4 . _ 4a, � . . � ._ ` . - Iffl{rRYG�,� ^ � �-�•r� �� ; " � . IIf11YGL llOf � r - ' ' f . . . � �: RPII6ES'A6PP ; : : �' ' '~ - ; ;� � . �; - � • -: ' �_ � . ''�= _ - 3 . � �r �,t�_' . � - � . � ,- o�t� _1 l�� 3— � � Respectfully Sub�itted� . Fl�rs�P.E. - ____ � blit Ilorts bi�ectar �4 Novemb :r 19, 1990 City oE Fridley CORRZD)R MAINTENANCE PROJEC [' NO. 199 . � . :� : . � �:•� �? This is to certify that items of the work shown fn the statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the a:>ove-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specilications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $32,Oto.00 and the final payment of $5,94Z.85 for the improvement project would cover in full, the contractor's claims aqainst the City f or all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this project. I dec Lare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is j ust + �nd correct . o; r � Joe � N lIAINTENAI�i , ; �_ � ; , � , President 17C CITY O? lAIDLEY BIISLIC wOit�B DEP7IRTI�IT EMGIl1EERI�TG DIVIBIO�i �431 IIniv�rsitp �v�., x.E. trial•y, l�r ss�3z November 19, 1990 Honora ble 1rlayor and City Council City cf Fridley C/O William w. Burns, City Manager b431 t;niversity Ave., N.E. FridlF y, I�1 55432 Council Members: • �t_f= - � �= �. We he�eby submit the Final Estimate for Corridor Maintenance Project No. 199, for Walbon Lawn Maintenance, 3225 Skycroft Drive, St. Arthony, MN, 55418. We ha��e viewed the work under contract for the construction of CORRILOR MAINTENANCE PROJECT NO. 199 and find the �ame is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I reccmmend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by ycur Honorable Body and that the one-year contractual maintEnance bond commence on November 16, 1990. Respec tfully submitted, . / �'�� ohn C . Flora Director of Public Works Prepared Checked 17D Novemb� :r 19 , 1990 To: P� �blic Works Dfrector . - . - �_-�.- .� �� •-� •� .•; � • �, � - �•• �•• _►� �� =�ts •,! ,• We, thE undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complei .e in conformity with the plans and specifications ot the proj ec1.. All de�iciencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work f�r which the City feels the contractor should receive a reducec. price has been aqreed upon by the contractor. So, th:refore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attachfd FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year mainteiance bond, etarting from the day of the final inspection that bEinq �ovember 16. 1990. � 17E 0 �- � Novembf r 19, 1990 City oi Fridley CORRID(R MAINTENANCE PROJECT NO. 199 PI�EVAILINQ IIAGE VERIFICl�TION This is to certify that Walbon Lawn Maintenance has nbided by the Prevail inq waqe Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labcr and Industry for Anoka County. I declz re under the penalties of perjury that this etatement is just ani correct. wALBO�I LlrAN �IZiTSNANCE � ' � � �: - � �7/�'�� i�`'�z �. Wal�on, President� 17F