Loading...
06/04/1990 - 00006516' , � THE MIN[TTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF JUNE 4. 1990 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:37 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Billings, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and Councilwoman Jorgenson MEMBERS ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, MAY 21. 1990: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Nee requested the following item be added: (3.1) Consideration of Commission Appointments. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seaonded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: MARY VASECKA - LOCKE LAKE ASSOCIATION: Ms. Vasecka, 6909 Hickory Drive, extended thanks to John Flora for his efforts and communication regarding the Locke Lake problems. She stated that she understands soil borings will take place in the next few weeks. She questioned if any other progress has been made that the residents should be aware of. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that work is continuing with the City Attorney to draft a petition to present to the itice Creek Watershed District. He stated that there is a Chapter 112, a watershed 509 Plan, and a new 601 Plan that affect the storm water improvement projects. He stated, hopefully, there would be additional information to present to the Council by the June 18 �I � � FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAGE 2 meeting. He stated that he would continue to keep the residents informed, as Locke Lake is one of the City's high priority projects. Mr. Flora stated that as plans are developed the sedimentation issue will be addressed and a determination made if it is marketable. He stated that in regard to the detention pond, it is hoped that the City can work with the District Engineer5 to incorporate it into their plans. Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that he has done some research on the problem and it must be recognized that the project can be completed if there are enough funds to pay for it. He stated that he is trying to figure out how this can be accomplished in the most efficient way and what the administrative and leqal complexities involve. He stated that there are some procedures in Chapter 112 involving special assessments and appraisals of damages, but this is very slow and very expensive. Mr. Herrick stated that he is attempting to determine sources of funding in addition to the money the homeowners and the City will pay. He stated that this involves other governmental agencies which, in itself, are slow and sometimes complex. He stated that Chapters 112 and 473 include the original 509 Plan which has been modified by the 601 Plan, and in addition, there is reference to Chapters 106 and 429. He stated that to determine how these provisions interrelate is complex. He stated that more time was needed to research this material and to contact the attorney for the Rice Creek Watershed District. He stated that, hopefully, he would have a written report for the Council at their next meeting. Mr. Burns, City Manager, felt this process would move very slowly as the City is not in control of all the variables. He stated that there are a lot of agencies involved and that some funds have been set aside for at least the initial phase of the project. Ms. Vasecka stated that she realizes it is a slow process, but the Locke Lake Association just wants to make sure the improvements are completed this time. CONNIE METCALF - WEED PROBLEM AT MOORE LAKE: Ms. Metcalf, 860 West Moore Lake Drive, stated the residents living on Moore Lake are concerned about the weed problem. She submitted a sample of the weed she had removed from the lake and stated the entire lake is full of it. She stated these weeds are visible from Highway 65 and produce a green scum. Ms. Metcalf stated she felt that this detracts from the lake and Fridley's image, as Highway 65 is heavily traveled. She asked that the City consider steps to correct this problem. She stated that other residents living on the lake are also concerned and that she would be willing to have � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 3 a meeting regarding the problem. She stated that there is also another weed with a purple flower that is spreading along the east side of the island. Councilman Schneider asked that staff identify the weed and submit a report on the west basin of Moore Lake. SCOTT LUND - '49ER DAYS: Mr. Scott Lund thanked all the Fridley organizations involved in the '49er Day Celebration on June 13 - 17, 1990. He invited the Council and all the residents to participate in the activities during this celebration. PUBLIC HEARINGS: l. REZONING. ZOA #90-02, BY FRIDLEY TOWN SOUARE ASSOCIATES, TO REZONE THREE SEPARATE PARCELS AS FOLLOWS: LOT 9, BLOCK 2, RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1 FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING, TO S-2, REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, THE SAME BEING 355 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E. AND, LOT 12. BLOCK 3, RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2 FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING TO S-2, REDEVELAPMENT DISTRICT,THE SAME BEING 368 - 66TH AVENUE N.E. AND, LATS 10, 11 AND 12, BLOCK 2, RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 1. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, AND LOTS 13, 14, 15 AND 16, BLOCK 3, RICE CREEK TERRACE PLAT 2, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF ON FILE AND OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF TIIE COUNTY RECORDER, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND C-1. L�CAL BUSINESS, TO S-2, REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, THE SAME BEING 6525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.: MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading o£ the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:58 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this rezoning is requested to allow development at the northeast corner of Highway 47 (University Avenue) and Mississippi Street. She stated the developers have completied a similar development in the City of Minneapolis known as Calhoun Village. She stated that there are two petitions that were received by the Planning Commission and a third petition from various business owners in the vicinity of this intersection. She stated that the developer held two neighborhood meetings. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEBTING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 4 , Ms. Dacy stated that the properties to be rezoned include the 10,000 Auto Parts site as well as single family homes. She stated that the zoning proposed is S-2 which is comparable with a PUD District where the City approves or disapproves the rezoning based on a particular plan or proposal. Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated that the Center City Plan was adopted in 1979 by the HRA and City Council. He stated that this plan included the Holly Center, the Target Northern Operations Building, the Fridley Plaza Office Building and Clinic, and the parking ramp. He stated that the 10,000 Auto Parts site has been a part of this plan and called for a commercial development or mixed uses. Mr. Robertson stated that when the HRA first considered the project, 10,000 Auto Parts was still a viable company. He stated that with their demise, it was feasible to return to the original concept of financing on a pay-as-you-go basis. He stated the developer woulfl need an extra $1D0,000 for the carrying costs for the pay off of that grant; therefore, the grant would be in the neighborhood of $300,000 for five years or up to $315,000 for six years, depending on the interest rate of the loan at the time o£ closinq. � Mr. Robertson stated that the HRA considered this request at their April 18, 1990 meeting and gave conceptual approval to the financing and site plan subject to the neighborhood compatibility and traffic conditions. He stated that the present commarcial building, the four vacant residential lots to the north, and the two developed residential lots to the east generate approximately $17,000 to $18,000 in taxes. He stated that with this proposed development, a minimum of about $84,000 would be paid in taxes. That amounts to a substantial increase in tax revenue to the City and will be available to the school district and the county when the tax increment district is de-certified. Ms. Dacy presented the site plan and stated that the proposal is £or a 28,000 square foot retail facility, one story in height, with a masonry rock face exterior. She stated that not all the typical setbacks have been met that are required in a commercial zone. She stated that the setback on University Avenue is 3o feet instead of 35 ieet, and along Mississippi and 66th Avenue the setback is 15 feet. She stated that the parking setback is only 15 £eet instead of 20 feet. Ms. Dacy stated that the developer has proposed an extensive screening plan to construct a six foot masonry wall along the north lot line abutting 66th Avenue and on the east lot line. She stated � that staff recommends the planting of additional trees along the north lot line. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 5 � Ms. Dacy stated that, in regard to the Light Rail Transit (LRT) issue, Mr. Yantos has sent a letter regarding this particular proposal. She stated that, basically, it states that if this development is constructed and the LRT is also located along this route, Anoka County recommends University Avenue be the major feeder route and a major pickup at this site. She stated that this would also act as a bus feeder site for dropping off passengers to use the LRT system. Ms. Dacy stated that it was requested that the City reserve an easement and, if a park-and-ride system is necessary, the County could consider acquisition of the eight homes between 66th and 67th Avenues for a park-and-ride lot. She stated this would necessitate expansion of the driveway along the east side. Ms. Dacy presented a video of the developers� other business center in Minneapolis, Calhoun Village, and pointed out the building materials that were used. Ms. Dacy also presented a video of the traffic on Mississippi Street between 5th Street and University Avenue that was taken between 3:30 and 4:30 p.m. last Friday, June 1. She stated that she did not observe any stacking of the vehicles past the 10,000 Auto Parts site. Ms. Dacy stated that the majority of the � eastbound traffic on Mississippi Street is in the right hand lane and tends to move over to the left hand lane. She felt that this should not be a problem as there would be adequate time to make this lane change. She stated that during this hour of filming, six pedestrians were walking along Mississippi Street, but no one crossed the street. She stated that there were also a number of bicyclists along the north side of Mississippi Street. Ms. Dacy stated the developers' glan is to move the driveway farther to the east. Mr. Dave Koski, Traffic Consultant with Barton-Aschman, stated that a traffic study was conducted for the intersection of Mississippi Street and University Avenue as well as 5th Street and Mississippi Street. He stated that this was compared to a 1987 traffic count conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. He stated that, basically, the traffic volumes at the intersection have not changed much between 1987 and now. He stated that they also conducted an analysis of how the proposed development would affect the tra£fic. Mr. Koski stated that Barton-Aschman has been actively engaged in surveying traffic generated by all types and sizes of developments and utilizes a combination of their observed traffic generations, as well as that produced by the Institute of Traffic Engineers, in determining the amount of traffic this development would generate. ' He stated that for a development of this type the peak retail period is occurring during the peak traffic hours. He stated that this is attributed to the fact that a lot of people are combining FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 6 ' a shopping trip with the time they come home from work. He stated that the peak traffic is between 4:30 and 5:30 at University Avenue and Mississippi Street. Mr. Koski stated that a significant amount of traffic, about 50 percent, going into this shopping center is already travelinq on the street, but he assumed for this study that the traffic generated was all new traffic. Mr. Koski stated that, basically, they calculated the capacity of the University/Mississippi intersection as it is today with existing traffic, considered the new proposed configuration by the County, and added the additional traffic for the shopping center. He stated it was found that the intersection operates at a D level of service. He stated that this scale is based on A being perfect and F as failing. He stated that D is considered to be an acceptable level of service in an urban area. He also stated that if nothing was changed at the intersection and the improvements were installed, the intersection would operate at a D+ or very close to a C. Mr. Koski stated that it is felt that this shopping center would not change the capacity of traffic generated at this intersection. He stated that the primary reason for the level D service at this intersection is on the west side. He stated that the signal needs re-timing and re-phrasing. Mr. Koski stated that they reviewed the impact of left turns for ' vehicles eastbound on Mississippi Street and for left turns into the site. He stated that there are sufficient gaps in the Mississippi Street westbound traffic to accommodate the demand to turn left into the shopping center. He stated that there is capacity available and the left turn would not have any significant impact on the traffic on Mississippi Street. Mr. Koski stated that the primary delay would be for traffic exiting the shopping center to go eastbound on Mississippi Street but felt there would only be a backup of several cars. Mr. Koski stated that the impact the shopping center may have on 5th Street and Mississippi Street was not significant. He stated that on a very conservative approach and assuming all the traffic generated by the shopping center was new traffic, there would not be a significant impact on the University/Mississippi and 5th Street/Mississippi intersections. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of this rezoning request. She stated that some of the members of the Commission felt that because the site plan did not meet all the setbacks, it was not appropriate. The majority of the members felt that with the potential that some of this area would be used as an LRT park-and-ride, they would prefer the site be used as such rather than for this proposed development. � Ms. Dacy stated that staff's recommendation is for approval of the rezoning with several stipulations. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SiTNE 4, 1990 PAGE 7 � Mr. Bob Guzy, attorney for the developers, stated that the developers have been working with City staff and the HRA on their plans for this development. He stated that he felt this was a good project and that it would be another step in the City accomplishing their goals for the property. He stated that the revitalization of Holly Center has benefitted the City and, with this development, there would be three quadrants that would create the "halo" effect and increase the development potential for the southwest quadrant. Mr. Guzy stated that wherever there is redevelopment there are potential conflicts. He stated that he wanted to ensure the Council and neighborhood that the developer, Urban Commercial Developers, and their anchor tenant, Walgreen's, will be a good neighbor and a good corporate citizen. He stated that the Council has to look at what is there now and what will happen when the development is completed. He stated that the neighbors have talked about this site being an eyesore. Mr. Guzy stated that the developers worked with sta££ to have a pleasing development for the neighbors and to provide the essential buffer. He stated that there will be no funneling of traffic into the residential area and that the flow of traffic is onto Mississippi Street. Mr. Guzy stated that part of the site is already commercial and that Council made a decision that this be a vital intersection in � the City. He stated that the development would also add to the tax base which affects all citizens of Fridley. He stated that the developers are working with the City to put this property back on the tax rolls. He stated that Council has the option of making this into a parking lot or making it a viable retail center that can provide funds and other benefits to the citizens. Mr. Guzy stated that it is essential to utilize the two houses and existing vacant land that abuts 66th Avenue in order to make the project feasible. He noted that a petition was received from businesses in the area and stated that in Columbia Heights there is a Snyder's and a Walgreen's within a block of each other and both and doing good business. Mr. Guzy stated that he is aware that the Planning Commission is concerned about the LRT issue. He stated that, in the future, there probably will be an LRT system on University Avenue. However, the question is if this would in any way prevent this project from proceeding. IIe stated that the bird in hand theory should not be diverted because of something in the future that could, potentially, occur. He stated that this project fits well with the City's plans, adds to the tax base, and creates jobs. He stated that it would not diminish retail competition but instead increase it. � Mr. Reese, the Project Architect, presented a drawing of the proposed site plan. He stated that the construction materials are FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEBTING OF JUNE 4. 1990 PAGE 8 � pre-finished masonry units with a metal roof over the front canopy. He stated that the building is designed to fit in with the neighborhood. Mr. Schuette, UCD, stated that the center would be a 28,000 square foot neighborhood convenience center. He stated that there is a demand in Fridley for additional retailers who want to bring new concepts and ideas to the City. He stated that the anchor tenant would be Walgreen's, utilizing 11,000 square feet of the space, with six or seven other shops that would total 17,000 square feet. He stated that, for a comparison, Holly Center is about 75, 000 square feet. Mr. Schuette stated that this center would not bring anyone from across town to Fridley. He stated that it is designed for neighborhood use and that it may contain such stores as an insurance office, hair salon, video store, Chinese restaurant, etc. Mr. Schuette reviewed the site plan and stated that the center would be entered by one driveway on the east of the site. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked the location of Walgreen's loading dock. Mr. Schuette stated that it is along the east side of the building. ' Councilwoman Jorgenson questioned the width of the road. Mr. Schuette stated that it is 23 feet. Ms. Dacy stated on that the on the west side of the building it is 20 feet. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked about snow removal for this site. Mr. Schuette stated that their plans are to have the snow removed from the site. Councilman Schneider asked the approximate value of the center after it is constructed. Mr. Schuette stated that construction costs, including costs of the plan are over $2,0OO,ODD, and the perceived value when the center is finished is over $3,000,000. Councilman Schneider stated that he felt the Planning Commission recommendation was strongly influenced by the LRT issue. He asked Mr. Yantos, from a practical and realistic viewpoint, what would be the earliest LRT would be in operation. Mr. Yantos, representing the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority, stated that the earliest would probably be about seven � years. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 9 � Councilman Schneider asked how soon a decision would be made on the kiss-and-ride at this location. Mr. Yantos stated that a station is being planned for Mississippi Street and University Avenue. Councilman Schneider stated that there are some options for additional parking, but this may require the acquisition of homes. He questioned when this decision would be made. Mr. Yantos stated that the decision would be made between now and when construction begins five or six years from now. He stated that the homes to the north of this site would seriously be considered for parking. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked why a park-and-ride was not being considered at the Columbia Arena site. Mr. Yantos stated that in looking at station space and movement of people they are trying to keep the stations approximately one mile apart. He stated that they are also considering the east/west access which is important. He stated that it is very expensive and it really does not make sense to construct a station and to have one kiss-and-ride with another just a short di5tance to the � north. Mr. Yantos stated all of the stations, at least north of 37th Avenue, would be park-and-ride. Councilman Schneider asked if kiss-and-ride was not in the planning at this time. Mr. Yantos stated that it is in the plan but, as the planning continues, the need for park-and-ride will certainly be there. Mayor Nee stated that this is a surprise. Mr. Yantos stated that as they continue to work with the various communities they did not want to say they were only going to have a kiss-and-ride or drop-off for buses and cars as the potential for park-and-ride is very strong. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many park-and-rides were planned for Fridley. Mr. Yantos stated three: one at 57th Avenue, one at Mississippi Street, and one at Osborne Road. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how much land is needed for these sites. � Mr. Yantos stated that enough space to accommodate 200 to 300 cars or about a two to three acre site at each of these intersections. ' � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 10 Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the property would be owned by the City or the County. Mr. Yantos stated that it would be owned by the Railroad Authority. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if it would be tax exempt. Mr. Yantos stated that he assumed it would be tax exempt. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if a route has been established south of I-694. Mr. Yantos stated that this has not, as yet, been set. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Yantos what has led to the change in plans. Mr. Yantos stated that, as various committees have been meeting and focusing on the needs, the ridership is being reviewed, and one concern is to remove traffic from the City streets. He stated that they did not want people parking in front of homes on residential streets. He also stated that the committees have become more serious about park-and-ride. Councilman Billings stated that he finds it very enlightening to be hearing this information since he was not aware of it, and he is the Council's representative to the Anoka County Regional Railroad Authority. Mr. Yantos stated that they have reviewed this site in the northeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue and worked with the developers to provide space for a kiss-and-ride along with an easement for potential parking to the north. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how many stations would be required as LRT proceeds south. Mr. Yantos stated that stations would be located at 53rd, 49th, 44th, and 40th Avenues, and St. Anthony Boulevard. Councilwoman asked if these would be park-and-ride facilities or kiss-and-ride. Mr. Yantos stated that they would be park-and-ride. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that Mr. Yantos is talking about major development areas in the City that would be turned into tax exempt property £or park-and-ride areas. Mr. Yantos stated that they have thought about having parking beneath office and retail buildings. He stated that there are other alternatives to use the space beneath the office and retail buildings other than just for parking. Councilman Schneider stated that residents in the neighborhood are concerned about traffic. He asked if this was being taken into consideration with park-and-ride. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAGE 11 � Mr. Doug Moore, Associate with BRW, stated that the parking volume would depend on the size of the particular park-and-ride lot. He stated park-and-ride traffic would still use the entrance into the site. However, it would have to be widened and the Railroad Authority consider acquisition of additional property as well. Councilman Schneider asked if any of these homes were for sale, if the Railroad Authority would consider purchasing them. Mr. Yantos stated that he did not believe they would consider any purchases within the next six months. However, if property was available at the 10,00D Auto Parts site and it did not conflict with the City's goals, the Railroad Authority probably would consider purchasing it. Councilman Billings stated that two weeks ago there was discussion about the possibility of constructing a station on the southeast corner of Mississippi Street and University Avenue. Mr. Burns, City Manager, asked if any thought has been given for ingress and egress off University Avenue for this future site. Councilman Billings stated that throughout the planning process it has been his understanding that the Railroad Authority was going , to look at a bus and passenger drop-ofP at this particular location. He stated that once the LRT system was in operation the additional 25 spaces along University Avenue may be needed. He stated if, in the future, it was found that the ridership has increased, then at that time a determination would be made as to the need for additional parking. Mr. Erickson, UCD, stated that this is what he had heard from Mr. Yantos. He stated, basically, the Railroad Authority was going to establish a station and, if and when parking would be needed, would be determined by the demand. He stated that as of now, they have no way to determine whether parking would or would not be required. Councilman Billings stated that even though he serves on an intergovernmental aqency committee, it appears the committee is serving no function other than for someone to be able to say the City had input. He stated that it seems the decisions are made elsewhere and the committee is nothing more than a sham. He stated that he gets more fed up all the time. He stated that, recently, the Anoka County Board of Commissioners and Transportation Board decided to begin a bus service for Anoka County except for Columbia Heights and Fridley. He stated that maybe it is time Fridley went back to Ramsey County. � Councilman Billings stated that he is totally shoaked to get this far in the planning process encouraging the developer to work with the Railroad Authority and then find they have now changed their � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4. 1990 PAGE 12 philosophy of thinking. He stated that he doubted if this project would have gone this far if the City had been given this information six months ago. Mr. Bill Hogan, 365 Mississippi Street, stated that the driveway to this shopping center site is, in reality, being moved only about 80 feet east. Ae stated that with the improvements to the intersection the center median will be located just below the Marsolek property. Ms. Dacy stated that the existing most easterly driveway is being moved approximately 80 feet to the east, but from the University Avenue curb line, it would be about 360 feet to increase the reaction time. She stated that with the improvement of the intersection there would be dedicated stacking lanes into the shopping center site. Mr. Hogan stated that the original improvement plan for that intersection did not provide left turn lanes because there was no development on this site. Ms. Dacy stated that when the improvement plans were first completed for the intersection, the redevelopment of this site was not contemplated and the County was to locate the median just short of the existing driveway o£ this site. She stated that with this development proposal there is an advantage to moving the access farther to the east and provide a left turn lane into the site. Mr. Hogan stated that adjustments have been made on the north side of the shopping center to allow more landscaping, but he was concerned about the amount of space on the east side of the development. He stated that most of the drawings do not show the homes next to the proposed wall. However, the wall would be only 13 to 14 feet from his home. He felt that there was not room for landscaping, and if the road was widened for a park and ride lot, he assumed the wall would be located closer to his home. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Hogan what he felt would be a good use of this site. Mr. Hogan stated that he had not given it much thought but has usually thought about some kind of commercial development. He stated this proposed development moves closer to his home. Mr. Thayer, 377 - 66th Avenue, stated that he was opposed to the rezoning. He stated that he believed the site is too small even with acquisition of the two residential lots. He stated that the setbacks would be less than what is normally allowed for this type of development. He stated that another concern is snow storage, and he believed it would be several days before the area could be used if there is a heavy snowfall. Mr. Thayer felt that the single combined entrance and exit is a disaster, and those who want to FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETINd OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAG& 13 � proceed eastbound will have a problem exiting. He stated that he believed this would begin destruction of the neighborhood through the domino theory. Mr. Thayer stated that he felt a mistake was made when the existing construction was allowed on this site, and he did not believe the shopping center is the best use of this property. He stated that he believed development in the southwest corner of University Avenue and Mississippi Street and the 100 Twin property should be completed before this site. He stated that Mississippi Street is the main east/west thoroughfare and deliberately adding traffic without a well thought-out plan would be a terrible mistake. He felt that if the City has any long-range plans, they should let the residents know so they can make their plans accordingly. Councilman Billings stated that he is confused as to how this development impacts the southwest quadrant or the 100 Twin site. Mr. Thayer stated that the '�halo" effect would spill over into the southwest corner. He stated that his personal reaction is that if the southwest quadrant is completed it would probably remove this site as a location for this type of shopping center. He felt that something much more viable could be constructed on this site. � Councilman Billings asked Mr. Thayer what he would envision for this site. Mr. Thayer stated that his basis for saying it is not a good development is because it is so restrictive in size. He stated that this shopping center would only be located on a little over two acres. He felt that if the size was doubled a viable shopping center could be constructed with better access and sufficient shops. He felt that some type of multi-story building should be considered and a deternination made as to what is the best possible use of the land. Councilman Schneider asked if Mr. Thayer felt a multi-story building should be retail or housing. Mr. Thayer stated that there are multi-story buildings where the first level is all parking and felt this would also meet the LRT needs if it becomes a reality. He stated that the rest of the spaoe could be used for different offices. Mayor Nee stated that it is very difficult for the City to spell out exactly what they want on a site and then have it completed. He stated that the market usually dictates what a developer or those financing a project want to construct. He stated that this proposal for the site is the most realistic one that as far as he � has seen it is being responsive to the City's concerns. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAGE 14 , Mr. Thayer asked if the developer would still proceed with this project if he was not provided with any of the incentives. Mayor Nee felt that no one would remove the existing building without some inoentive. He stated that there has been absolutely no investment in that structure since it was constructed. Mr. Thayer asked if the development would improve the quality of life for adjacent residents. Councilwoman Jorgenson felt that it would, to some degree, and believed it would also benefit the senior citizens livinq on the east side of University Avenue. Mayor Nee did not believe that there would be any adverse effects for those living further down the block. However, he stated the people immediately aoross the street may feel uncomfortable with the wall. He also stated that he views the existing building as almost a cancer and the economics are such that no one is qoing to invest in it. He stated that he is convinced there will not be a park-and-ride at this site. Mr. Thayer stated that his problem is to make sure that what is constructed on this site is the best for him. He expressed � disapproval when the existing building was construoted, he also stated that he did not want this to happen again. Ms. Louise Bennethum, 368 - 66th Avenue, stated that they have lived in their home for over thirty years, and this is the best proposal they have seen. She stated that when Red Owl was a tenant of the building, it was not pleasant to live next door as they had rats, noise, smells, etc. She stated that she constantly worried about a fire in the field because it was not mowed. She also felt that the situation would only get worse unless the Council approved this rezoning. Ms. Bennethum felt that the development would provide a much needed improvement over what is now existinq on the site. Councilman Billings asked Ms. Bennethum if her property was one that was being acquired to which she answered in the affirmative. Ms. Terry Mau, 7343 Hayes Street, stated that as a homeowner and business owner in Fridley she would like nothing more than to see the southwest corner develop. She stated that she can sympathize with the owners of the property because they do not want to make improvements when there is uncertainty and talk of redevelopment. She felt that homes should be constructed on this site as it is not a good area for a business. Ms. Mau stated that the area is small, and this center would be a large development for this site. She � stated that the parking allowed for employees is not sufficient as they have more parking available at their Rice Plaza Center, and there still is a garking problem. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF J[JN8 4, 1990 PAGE 15 � Councilman Billings asked if the southwest quadrant was redeveloped where Ms. Mau would consider moving her business. Ms. Mau stated that she hoped any redevelopment would allow her to relocate in the same area. Councilman Billings stated that he was surprised that business owners located in Rice Plaza submitted a petition as he felt the development of this site may allow them to relocate to this site which would be in the same vicinity. Ms. Mau stated that she felt there is a problem with access to this site. She stated that Rice Plaza has two entrances and exits where there is not a worse traffic situation in Fridley. Ms. Brenda Tibbets, 421 Mississippi Street, stated that they have a problem entering and exiting their driveway. She felt that the senior citizens would also have problems crossing Mississippi Street. She stated that the existing building is an eyesore but felt the shopping center was too large for the site, and the parking would not be adequate. She questioned why improvements could not be made to the existing building rather than acquiring people's homes. Ms. Marilyn Sullivan, 522 - 66th Avenue, stated that she agrees � with the decision of the Planning Commission to table the rezoning at this time. She felt that the LRT issue needs to be resolved before development occurs on this site. She stated that she did not feel the neighborhood would benefit from this development. Ms. Sullivan stated that this site is a prime location for a park-and- ride for the LRT system. She stated that she did not feel the traffic studies provided significant details and that they need to be conducted over several weeks and months. She stated that the impact on the neighborhood deserves priority, and it seems wrong to remove homes and erode the neighborhood. Ms. Sullivan felt the site should be developed to be compatible with park-and-ride. She suggested that perhaps a day care center or a nursing home should be developed. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is a moratorium on the construction of nursing homes. She stated that as far as a day care center, with the traffic and playground facilities that would be necessary, this site would not be feasible. She stated that in regard to the LRT, the Council was told this would be a kiss-and- ride site, and that people would park at Columbia Arena and be bussed to this site. Mr. George Meissner, 373 Mississippi Street, stated that he did not believe this rezoning would benefit his property. He stated that it is difficult now to access his home, and the situation � would only get worse. He believed that if a shopping center is constructed it would generate a lot of traffic. He stated that, as it is now, it sometimes takes him five minutes to get out of his FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGS 16 � driveway. Mr. Meissner stated that the site is relatively small, and even Holly Center, which is much larger, has been hurting for tenants. He felt that the Council also has to take into consideration the possibility of an LRT system and a park-and-ride at this location. He stated that he was opposed to the rezoning. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Meissner why he changed his mind about the rezoning since, at one time, he felt the rezoning should cover an even larger area. Mr. Meissner stated that nothing has changed his mind. He stated that the area is quite small and, i£ there is going to be development, the area needs to be larger. Mayor Nee questioned the effect of a park-and-ride lot on that site. Mr. Koski stated that when they conducted their study, the LRT issue was discussed with Mr. Yantos and Mr. Moore. He stated, however, there was not a conclusion on the amount of parking or type of traffic. He stated that they reviewed the park-and-ride situation and the parking that might occur for the bus system. He stated it seems that the amount of parking adjacent to Mississippi Street and University Avenue would not have that much impact. Mr. � Koski stated that with a park-and-ride the primary activity occurs at different hours than the shopping center's business. He stated that the primary exit for park-and-ride would be between 5:00 and 6:00 p.m., and the shopping center would not be open in the morning hours when park-and-ride would have its heaviest use. He stated that the entry/exit roadway would certainly have to be improved to the extent that it was wide enough to accommodate the extra traffic. Mr. Grant Olson, 390 - 67th Avenue, stated that there are a lot of vacancies now for retail space and that most of the traffic using Mississippi Street comes from 7th Street, which was not included in the traffic counts. Mayor Nee stated that as far as vacant retail space the City does not control who builds, but that it is the judgment of the developers and the ones providing the financial backing. Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Olson makes a very valid point. He stated that with the 100 Twin site the City had wonderful proposals, but nothing has materialized. He stated that it appears with this development that there are committed tenants for this shopping center. Ms. Patricia Anderson, 3667 - 66th Avenue, stated that she was � opposed to this development because of the LRT issue. She stated that if one does or does not support the development the FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JIINE 4, 1990 PAGE 17 , possibility of removing homes on 66th and 67th Avenues is something she cannot accept. She stated that to remove homes in an area that is not blighted is not acceptable. Councilman Billings stated that he had several concerns. He stated that he did not receive the traffic study from Barton-Aschman until this evening which did not allow him adequate time for review. He also stated that as he has been following this development project, he was under the assumption that a station for LRT would possibly be located on this corner. He stated, however, the intent was a bus point and passenger drop-o£f, and he now understands they need a parking lot immediately. He stated that he would like further clarification on the Railroad Authority�s thoughts. Councilman Billings stated that as recently as two weeks ago, the Railroad Authority was investigating if the LRT station could be on the southeast corner of University Avenue and Mississippi Street. He stated that one of the reasons they are looking at this northeast corner is because it is a recommendation of the City's Planning Commission. He stated that if they had not recommended this site the Railroad Authority probably would still have been considering Columbia Arena. He stated that he is sometimes confused as to the Planning Commission's direction. He stated that this site could generate up to $100,000 in property taxes and to � have this be used for LRT boggles his mind. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that it is very difficult to have a piece of property in limbo for seven to ten years waiting for a decision on the LRT system. Mr. Yantos stated that it is a difficult situation because they are talking concepts. He stated that the Railroad Authority has looked seriously at this northeast corner, and the concept today is to take 31 parking spots from the south end for a park-and-ride and, in the future, if more parking is needed they will need to acquire eight homes to the north. He stated that they also looked at the possibility for a station in the southeast corner. He stated that each time they meet new information does evolve. He stated that the Council will have the opportunity to review the final plans in four to six months. Councilwoman Jorgenson's concern was what the City is supposed to do in the meantime. She felt that development plans could not be set aside for the sites the Railroad Authority is contemplating to use as this could seriously impact the City financially. Mr. Yantos stated that they are aware of this; however, the process takes a long time. He stated that he can understand the difficulty in planning, but all they can do is provide information they have � to date. � � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 20 OLD BUSINESS: 3. SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL E5TATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF: Councilman Billings asked if the two property owners to the north were contacted in regard to the storage shed. Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that they have not been contacted. MOTION by Councilman Billings to table this item. Seaonded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3.1 CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS: RESIGNATION - ALEX BARNA: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to accept, with regret, Mr. Barna's resignation from the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION: MOTION by appointment Billings. Councilman Schneider to nominate Connie Modig for to the Planning Commission. Seconded by Councilman There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the appointment of Connie Modig, 1330 Hillcrest Drive, to the at-large Planning Commission seat for the term which expires April 1, 1993. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilman Billings to nominate Susan Price for appointment to the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Billings to cast a unanimous ballot for the appointment of Susan Price, 7449 Melody Drive, to the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission to the term expiring April 1, 1993. ' � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 21 Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. APPEALS COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to nominate Catherine Smith for appointment to the Appeals Commission. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by Mayor Nee. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to cast a unanimous ballot for the appointment of Catherine Smith, 6548 Clover Place, to the Appeals Commission to the term expiring April 1, 1991. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION: MOTION by Councilwoman Seconded by Councilman aye, Mayor Nee declared NEW BUSINESS• Jorgenson to table this appointment. Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting the motion carried unanimously. 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 16, 1990• A. ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 18, 1990, ON A REZONING, ZOA #90-04. BY THE IAYAL ORDER OF MOOSE LODGE 38, TO REZONE THE NORTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND 15. BROOKVIEW ADDITION, EXCEPT THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE NORTH 95 FEET OF LATS 14 AND 15, BROOKVIEW ADDITION. AND ALSO THE SOUTH 95 FEET OF LOTS 14 AND 15, BROOKVIEW ADDITION, EXCEPT THE WEST 22 FEET OF THE SOUTH 95 FEET, FROM R-3. GENERAL MULTIPLE DWELLING, TO C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6875 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this rezoning request, ZOA #90-04, for June 18, 1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. The Council received the minutes of the Planninq Commission Meeting of May 16, 1990. ' � ' FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 23 7. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. MINNESOTA. BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICTS: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinanoe upon first reading subject to approval of the variance application. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. FIRST RBADING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE• MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading and approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR ONONDAGA STREET STORM SEWER REPAIR PROJECT NO. 209: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for Project No. 209: Insituform Central, Inc. 6167 North Kent Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53217 $38,801.20 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a bid for this project was received from the sole producer of the insituform system, Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20. He stated that $30,000 was allocated, and it is recommended that the contract be awarded and a transfer of $8,801.20 be authorized from the Storm Water Utility Fund to Project. No. 209 in order to complete the project. MoTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for Project No. 209 to Insituform Central, Inc. in the amount of $38,801.20. Seconded by Councilwoman Sorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the transfer of $8,801.20 from the Storm Water Utility Fund to Storm Sewer Repair Project No. 209. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousiy. � � I� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 24 10. RESOLUTION NO. 33-1990 AUTAORIZING REAPPROPRIATIONS IN THE 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO PROVIDE BENEFITS AND COMPARABLE WORTH ADJUSTMENTS FOR TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES: Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that this resolution would authorize a transfer of $37,015 from the emergency reserve to provide for comparable worth adjustments and benefits for temporary employees. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 33-1990. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. APPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the following appointment by the City Manager: Starting Starting Name Position Salarv Date Replaces Mark Public Foster Services Worker Mechanic B Non-exempt $13.50 per hour $28,188.00 per year June 18, Robert 1990 Anderson Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. CLAIMS: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment o£ Claims No. 32213 through 32379. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. LICENSE5: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. ESTIMATES: MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted: � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1990 PAGE 25 Herrick & Newman 205 Fridley Plaza Office Bldg. 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Attorney For the Month of May, 1990 .... E. H. Renner & Sons 15688 Janis Street N.W. Elk Rivex, MN 55330 $ 3,528,00 Repair and Maintenance of Well No. 3 Project No. 203 FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,b32.OD Gammon Bros., Inc. 13845 Northdale Boulevard Rogers, MN 55374 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1989 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,301.08 Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voioe vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Billings stated that when he attacked the Anoka County Board for their adoption of a plan that did not include Fridley and Columbia Heights he wanted to note that Commissioners McCarron and Kordiak are working to include Fridley and Columbia Heights. He stated it was the Regional Transit Board that omitted Fridley and Columbia Heights. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of June 4, 199D adjourned at 11:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted, f�B</� �%� '-h—YGZ�C W�' C.e' "'� � �i Carole Haddad Secretary to the City Council � Approved: �� � �- William J. Nee Mayor