03/04/1991 - 5093O�'1rICZ71L CI'PY COUxCIL 71aE]�D�l
COQ�TCIL It1lBTI�G
ln1RCS �, 1991
f
�
i
:�
.'�� r; .
�.�
L
.� ,
��
`�,
::�
'$; :,
� ���r :�t
;,,
#'
;r.
.:_,� �
.�
,,:`��t �
��
�
;�
�, . '
iy.��.. �. .
�
. � � .'•�.: .
e �;
- . 4� ,-� ".:.. qi .,:
_ �.
c .. ��- .. ' _
q
`; '�" !
• �L
iz_
�
.� - � �� .,. �y
QFRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING
,. �inror
;�' f�a-�" ATTENDENCE SHEET
Mor�day , March 4 , 1991
7:30 P.M.
;� �LEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
` PRINT NAME (CLEARLY)
` �v� tise�d e �'
� ..
�. ,�
�,�,�<
�^Jb r�
ADDRESS
�? ./D
73as"
�`�(
�3� /
,, 3.?
- 7�
�.� �- ����
0
�3�a
3 �I
��
i�, ✓e/3,�7j ��'%V�"
�32,Q ��.� �V �
J,ee�.�j,J -���°" N.�
S+ � CKS s�J S� ,!ti' �
�/�
i�
�
ITEM
NUMBER
J
�
� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
�
:IN OF MARCB 4, 19 91
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEt
PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATIONs
Girl Scout Week
March 10 - 16, 1991
Volunteers of America Week
March 3 - 9, 1991
P�tESENTATION OF CERTIFICATl3 OF APPRECIATION:
To Jerry Sherek for his services on
the Appeals Commission.
APPROVAL OF MINQTES:
City Council Meeting of February 25, 1991
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
OPEN FORIIM, VISITORB:
(Consideration of items not on agenda - 15 minutes)
FRiDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1SEETINQ OF MARCH t, 1991 Paq• 2
STATE LEGISLATIVE IIPDATE:
�� Senator pon Frank
PQBLIC HEARZNGS
Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1991 - 2(73rd Avenue
Upgrade ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - lA
OLD BIISINE88:
Approval of Agreements for
Referendum Returns to
Independent School District
Nos. il, 13, 14, and 16
(Tabled 1/07/91) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2HH
NEW BII$INESS:
First Reading of an Ordinance
Recodifying Section 113 of the
Fridley City Code Entitled
"Solid Waste Disposal and .
Recycling Collection" by Adding
Sections 113.01.03, 113.01.04,
and 113.01.17 and Renumbering
Consecutively, and Amending
Section 113.07, and Amending
Section 11 of the Fridley City
Code Entitled "General Provisions
and Fees" by Amending Yard Waste
Transfer Site Gate Fee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3C
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1dEETINa OF �IARCH 4� 1991
NEW BIISINESS (CONTINIIED):
Paq. 3
Receive the Minutes of the Planning
Commission Meeting of February 20, 1991: ........ 4- 4.55
A. Special Use Permit, SP �91-02,
by Vance and Mary Nelson, to
Allow the Construction of a
Garage and Additional Livinq
Area in the CRP-2 (Flood
Fringe) District, on Lots 18-21,
Block Y, Riverview Heights
Addition, the Same Being 600
Buffalo Street N.E . ............. 4 - 4.3
............. 4.10 - 4.24
B. Special Use Permit, SP #91-03,
by Steve Weisenberger for
ABRA, to Allow Exterior
Storage of Materials and
Equipment on Lot 4, Block 2,
East Ranch Estates Second
Addition, Generally Located
at 7710 University Avenue N.E.
C. Resolution Approving a
Subdivision, Lot Split,
L.S. #91-001, to Split Off
that Part of Lot 6, Block 5,
Pearson's Craigway Estates
2nd Addition, Anoka County,
Minnesota, Which Lies
Southeasterly of a Line 3.5
Feet Northwesterly of and
Parallel with the Southeast
Line of Said Lot 6, and
Combine it with Lot 7,
Generally Located at 7836
.. 4.3 - 4.7
.. 4.25 - 4.42
and 7830 Alden Way N.E. ......... 4.8
_ ......... 4.43 - 4.55
lRIDI.BY CITY CODNCIL �EETi�3 OF ItARCS �, 1991 paq• 4
�TBN 8�8ZNE88 (CONTINIIED)s
Receive an Item from the Appeals
Commiesion Meetinq of February 5,
1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5T
A. Variance Request, VAR #91-02,
by Vance and Mary Nelson, to
Reduce the Front Yard Setback
from 35 Feet to 14.5 Feet for
an Existinq Condition, and to
Reduce the Front Yard Setback
from 35 Feet to 21 Feet to
Allow the Construction of a
Garage and Additional Livinq
Space on Lots 18-21, Block Y,
Riverview Heights Addition,
the Same Beinq 600 Buffalo
Street N.E.
Variance Request, VAR #90-32, by
First Western Development Corporation
(Tabled 2/25/91) . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Approval of Agreement Between the
Cities of Bloominqton and Fridley
for Provision of Hepatitis B Vaccine . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7H
Resolution Ordering Zmprovement,
Approval of Plans and Orderinq
Advertisement for Bids: Street
Improvement Project No. ST 1991 - 10
(Sealcoat) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8C
FRiDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF MARCH 4, 1991 Paq� 5
NEW BOSINE88 (CONTINIIED)i
Resolution Ordering Improvement,
Approval of Plans and Ordering
Advertisement for Bids: Sanitary
Sewer Repair Project No. 221
(Hacl�ann Avenue) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9C
Resolution Authorizing Changes in
Appropriations for the Capital
Improvement Fund and Authorizing
the Transfer of Funds from the
Capital Improvement Fund, Street
Division to the 1990 Street Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - l0A
Resolution Authorizing Changes in
Appropriations for the Capital
Improvement Fund and Authorizing
the Transfer of Funds from the
Capital Improvement Fund, Park
Division to the 1990 Street Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . il - 11A
Approval of Agreement for Legal
Services Between the City of
Fridley and Herrick & Newman
Law Firm for City Attorney
Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12A
FRIDLSY CITY COIINCZL 1SEETINa OF MARCH 4, 1991 Paqo 6
NEW BIISINE88 (CONTINIIED)S
Informal Status Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
�7•I�i�j�A
• .
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK
March 3 - 9,1991
Wiiliam J. Nee
Mayor
fridleY, MN.
�YV�f�2�;�5, tFi,e vo�unteers of �lmerica, a Christian socia�se�vi.c,e organization, is celedrating
its 95th year of service to the people of �Cucnesota an� the nation; and
�YU�-f��',�5, tf�e No�unteers of �lmerica is mak;uig a valuadle contridutivrc to the people of
Minnesota 6y provic�'ing 2 nsidential tr�atment centers for emoti'onal�y hand'icappect 6oys; 3
programs seruing autistic, autistic-lil� and/or deve(opmentalG� d'�sal(� cFiilclren and youth; 40
treatment foster �iomes andgroup homes for infants, chilrt�n and youth; 5 homes far efcferty and'/
or mental�y d'rsad�ec� adu�ts; 41 senior citizen �'ining sites in �lrcol�,a and �Cennepin Counties; 2
pre-release anc�work; ��ease correctiorcal programs for men and ajai.� zvor/�,house, and wor�; �lzase
correctionaf facility for female offenders; plus 3 fimrsing complexes for fami(es, tFi.e karccCuappecf,
and the eliter(a�: and 4 fong-term ca� fcui�ities; an�
�iN"X��C;�,S, t.�e votunteers of �lmerica, throughout its compassionate, yet prcutica� crusade,
is extending spiritual fellowship as it provicles �f'�ef wfie� it is most urgent; and
�-f��;�lS, t.(.e �tlo�unteers of America is commemorating its fourt�ittg in 1896 and u�es others to
uphold tke �lmerican phi�anthropic spirit through tfceir commitment to he�p tlwse in need,•
a(Q`YV, ?�-!�?��"D�, B� 17�SOL`L�ED that 1, �YVi%�iam�. 91(�e, 9bfayor of tke City of �ridley,
he�dy proclaim �bfarck 3- 9,1991 as
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK
�D, B� 17 FZL7�,7�f�?Z,1�SOLti'ED, t.fiat copies of this proclamation de transmitted to
the `Vo�unteers of America as evi�ence of our esteem.
I�`iNl2�ESS `YVJf��O� I have set my ha.nd and
caused the sea�of the City of �ridley to be affi.�ed this
4 th day of 91�farich,1991.
WII,LIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
�
=��:� �
t
'1'SS l[I�iOTEB OT TSE �tIDLEY CITY �OIIliCZL I�3TIXfi O?
lsB�tIIUtY ZS, if91
��
..,
�
�
'r
,
. . . . ., . . �g,-.
� �
� .. . . . . .... ..
� �
N. . . � . . . ...
�
� ' r � . . � ' . .
�
��.. , . . � . . . � � . '
. . . . . . ' . . . '�`. _
't .
� _ . . �. . . t � ..
y
�. . ... � . . . � � .
�
,. . - . . ... .
'.
, ... . .. _ ... _ `__ "_. .-
.�
THE MINIITES OF THS REGIILAR MEETIN(3 OF THE FRIDL$Y CITY CO�I�TCIL OF
�EHRIIARY 25. 1991
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:34 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE•
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledqe of Alleqiance
to the Flag.
�tOLL CALL t
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilman Billinqs, Councilman
Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and
Councilwoman Jorqenson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
�1PPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING, FEBRUARY 11, 1991:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the minutes as
presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda as submitted.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
There was no response from the audience under this item of
business.
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. 1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUND REQUEST TO THE
COUNTY OF ANOKA:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearinq. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at
7:37 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this year the
City will receive approximately $117,683 in Community Development
FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF FBBRIIARY 25. 1991 PAa$ 2
Block Grant funds. She stated that it is proposed these funds be
allocated to the Riverview Heights project and human services.
Ms. Dacy stated there is one property that remains to be acquired
in the Riverview Heiqhte area, and it will be necessary to borrow
CDBG funds from another community in order to complete the
acquisition. She stated that the City could petition the City of
Coon Rapids for approximately $25,000 to assist with this final
acquisition which would be repaid from the CDBG 1992 allocation.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission and Human Resources
Commission recommended approval of the allocation of these funds
to the Riverview Heiqhts project in the amount of $77,848 and to
human services in the amount of $38,835. She stated that $1,000
will be committed to pay the County administrative fee.
Councilman Billings asked the City's obligation to repay the funds
that might be borrowed from Coon Rapids, if CDBG funds are not
available in the future. Ms. Dacy stated that there would be no
obligation.
No other persons spoke regarding the allocation of these CDBG
funds .
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearinq.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 7:40 p.m.
OLD BUSINESS:
2. AMENDMENT TO THE ADOPTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
FRIDLEY TOWN S4UARE DEVELOPMENT TO CONSIDER ADDING A DRIVE-
THROUGH WINDOW FOR A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT ON THE WEST SIDE OF
THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THE PROPERTIES INCLUDED IN THIS
REDEVEIAPMENT PLAN ARE 355 MISSISSIPPI STREET. 368 - 66TH
�VENUE, AND 6525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE (TABLED 2j11f91):
Mayor Nee stated that this item was tabled on February 11, 1991 for
further information.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to remove this item from the table.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that staff has no
new information to present except that at a future meeting a list
of uses will be presented to identify which uses may or may not
have to be submitted to the Commission and Council before location
in this center.
FRIDLEX CITY COIINCIL MBETINa OF F$BRIIARY 25. 1991 PAQ$ 3
Ms. Dacy stated that she would like to clarify one of the
stipulations. She stated that in Stipulation No. 9 there is
reference to an eiqht foot wall, however, in Stipulation No. 1,
there is reference to a six foot wall. She stated that she would
like to clarify, if the Council approves the amendment to the
redevelopment plan, that an eiqht foot wall is recommended and the
languaqe referrinq to a six foot wall ehould be deleted fn
Stipulation No. 1.
Ms. Dacy stated that the developer has a purchase agreement on this
parcel and the two existinq homes that abut the property. She
stated that last June the Council approved rezoning this property
to S-2 for a shoppinq center development. She stated that the
petitioner is now requestinq the location of a faet food restaurant
and drive-through with Burqer ICinq as the proposed tenant. She
stated that the Burger King restaurant now located in the southwest
corner of the University/Mississippi intersection is proposing to
relocate on this parcel in the northeast corner of the
intersection.
Mayor Nee stated that the issue before the council is an amendment
to the approved development plan to permit a drive-through window
for the Burger King restaurant. He stated that some of the
concerns raised involved traffic, noise, and air pollution.
Mr. Bob Guzy, attorney for the petitioner, stated that a letter was
submitted to the City from Burqer King regarding their hours of
operation. He stated the condition that just this Burger King is
the only one that could locate on this site is still on the table.
Mr. Guzy stated that the developer is interested in working with
the neighbors to maintain the screening wall between the commercial
and residential areas. He stated that the traffic and
environmental consultants, Burger King representatives, and the
developer are present this eveninq to answer any questions from the
Council.
Councilman Billings asked if Burger King did not relocate to this
site, but a different fast food restaurant located there, if that
would have a significant impact on the traffic study that was done.
He stated that even if Burger King does relocate to this site, the
City would also be dealinq with a vacant building on the southwest
corner, which is set up for a fast food operation, and he
questioned the impact on the traffic.
Mr. Roski, Barton-Aschman Associates, stated that this would not
have a significant impact, and traffic would not back up past the
driveway into the site. He stated that their assumption was if
another fast food facility moved into the existing Burqer Rinq site
it would have a lower traffic volume as it is not a desirable
location for a fast food operation. He stated that this was one
of the reasons why Burqer Kinq wants to move to another location.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF FEBRIIARY 25. 1991 BAQE 4
He stated that there would not be a eiqnificant impact on traffic
at the University/Mississippi intersection.
Councilman Billinqs asked Mr. Koski if he had any knowledqe as to
how any median modifications miqht affect adjacent landowners and
if there was any qovernmental liability.
Mr. ICoski stated that the construction of inedians and roadways is
under qovernmental jurisdiction, whether it be the County, the
State, or the City. He stated that the installation of a median
cannot be considered as damaqes to facilities that miqht be located
adjacent to the roadway. He stated that the median is clearly
under governmental jurisdiction and does not subject a qovernmental
body to damages for access; however, removinq driveways may be a
different case.
Ms. Marilyn Sullivan, 522 - 66th Avenue, stated that she has
concerns about the traffic and was not sure this would be
beneficial for the neighborhood. She felt that there may be a
problem with the traffic and, in the future, traffic may be routed
down 66th Avenue. She stated that at one time, she saw 75 cars at
the intersection, and this was not referred to in the traffic
study. Ms. Sullivan felt that some siqnage was needed for vehicles
to yield to pedestrians in crosswalks. She stated that homes in
the neighborhood have been sold since approval was given for this
shopping center.
Mr. Guzy stated that the major issue is the impact on the
community. He stated he wanted to emphasize that the developer has
made changes to the site plan regarding truck deliveries, extending
the barrier wall and increasing the height of this wall. He stated
that this is an attempt to protect the neighbors immediately
adjacent to the site. He stated that whatever landscaping is
needed will be provided by the developer. He stated it is felt
that steps have been taken to, if not to eliminate, to alleviate
any problem created by traffic goinq around the building.
Mr. Guzy stated that Burger King has etated if there is a problem
with the hours of operation, those hours could be modified and
changed. Mr. Guzy stated they would be willinq to state that there
would not be another fast food on that site if this proposal for
Burger King did not materialize.
Councilman Billings asked, in reference to the ten stipulations,
if there are any stipulations not included this evening that were
included in the first development plan which may apply.
Ms. Dacy stated that whatever was approved last year still
pertains, and none of the original seventeen stipulations were
changed.
�RIDLEY CITY C04NCIL l[EETINa OF FESRIIARY 25. 1991 PAQS S
Councilman Billings asked if the ten stipulations would be in
addition to the seventeen Btipulations. Ms. Dacy answered in the
affirmative.
Mayor Nee stated he personally felt that with the changes proposed,
the neqatives and positives have not chanqed from the oriqinal
plan. He etated that more noisy traffic has been moved to the
front of the building. He Btated that the situation is no worse
than the original plan and suspects it may be better. He Btated
that it seems this is a reasonable proposal.
Councilman Schneider asked if this amendment to the plan was not
approved if the shopping center project would not proceed.
Mr. Guzy stated that the word received from their financial
consultants is that Burqer King is essential for this operation.
He stated that if Miller and Schroeder states it would not proceed
there is a question if others would want to proceed.
Councilman Billinqs stated that he has taken a serious look at this
entire development, felt that the development proposed in 1990 was
probably adequate, and this is more development than the site
deserves. He stated that he is havinq a difficult time coming up
with the tests of turninq down this project. He stated that he
would just as soon not see a fast food restaurant on this site, but
has the responsibility of upholding the statute and does not want
to go to court to debate if this is a good or bad project.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the amendment to the
Redevelopment Plan for Fridley Town Square, with the following
stipulations: (1) The screeninq wall shall be extended to
University Avenue. The landscaping plan shall be revised to add
additional Evergreens along 66th Avenue if a six foot height is
maintained or Ivy plantinqs along the wall if an eight foot height
is constructed. A three foot continuous hedqe and trees for every
fifty feet of driveway should also be provided along University
Avenue; (2) A lighting plan should be submitted and approved in
conjunction with the building permit application; (3) A pavement
marking plan delineating drive-through and loading traffic shall
be submitted in conjunction with the building permit application.
A"no parking - loading only" zone should be striped along the rear
of the building adjacent to the Walgreen's use, and along the east
side of the buildinq; (4) The decibel level of the order box should
be at a level where its noise is not audible from residential
properties to the north; (5) Construction details of the odor
venting system shall be submitted in conjunction with the building
permit application. Venting for the fast food restaurant shall be
routed to the westerly point of the building before beinq released
to the open air, consistent with the original approval in June of
1990 (Stipulation #17). The petitioner shall install a double
baffle filtration system; (6) The property owner shall work with
the Anoka County Regional Rail Authority to provide pedestrian
FItIDLEY CITY COIINCIL 1[EETINQ OF 1�$BR�ARY 25. 1991 PAaB 6
connections where appropriate into the site, including striping or
sidewalks; (7) Walgreen's ehall submit in writing to the City, to
prohibit loadinq/unloadinq activities between 21:00 a.m. and 2:30
p.m. and 4:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m.; (8) No other restaurants shall
be $llowed in this development project without the consent of the
City; (9) An 8 foot wall shall be constructed arou�d the project
and extended to University Avenue; and (10) A striped walkway from
the bikeway/walkway across the driveway to the front of the
building and siqnaqe indicating the bikeway/walkway shall be
included as part of the project. Seconded by Mayor Nee.
MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to amend the above motion by adding
the following three additional stipulations: (1) The seventeen
existinq stipulations approved in 1990 shall remain in place; (2)
The developer shall commit to the landscaping on the two properties
immediately east of the project in the same magnitude as aqreed to
in 1990; (3) The developer acknowledges that the current traffic
study and the most recent preliminary plans for improving
Mississippi Street notwithstanding, the appropriate qovernment
bodies reserve the right to change and alter the aliqnment of the
roadway. This may include extending the raised median and allowing
no left turns into or out of this project. The developer is
encouraged to make this information known to all tenants. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider.
Councilman Billings stated he wanted to make sure that the
developer understands that there are no quarantees the median will
remain as it is now. He stated that it is the responsibility of
the governmental bodies to maintain traffic quality and if in the
future it requires extension of the median, he does not want the
developer to come back saying the City led him to believe this
would never happen.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION FOR THE AMENDMENT,
Councilman Billinqs, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick,
and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilwoman Jorqenson
voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried.
Councilman Schneider asked if there was any way there could be a
review to determine if everythinq is proceeding as the experts have
stated and that this proposal is not any more disruptive than the
original development plan. He stated that he shares Ms. Sullivan's
concerns that the plan may not be what it seems and would like to
be able to review the traffic.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that the applicant has indicated
if there is a serious problem, they would review the hours of
operation. He stated that if there is a problem with noise as it
pertains to the speaker system, he felt that could be adjusted.
He felt that there could be a stipulation, if the developer and
Burger Rinq agreed, that there be a review after one year of
traffic, noise, and odors. He stated that if there is a
�RIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MBETINQ OF F$HRIIARY 25. 1991 PAQ$ 7
siqnificant problem they would aqree to cooperate with the City
and do everythinq reasonably feasible to correct any problems.
Mr. Guzy stated that from Burger Rinq's standpoint, if there is a
problem, they will try to resolve it. He stated that the Council
now has a letter from Burger Rinq regardinq their hours of
operation, the experts have indicated equipment t�ill be installed
for the odors, and traffic counts have been presented by the
experts .
Councilman Schneider stated that his concern is what happens if
these reports prove not to be true. He asked if the developer
would be willing to post a performance bond to correct any
legitimate problems that might arise from the development. He
stated that in his heart he wants to vote aqainst this proposal;
however, he does not like what now exists on the parcel and felt
the original development plan which was approved provided an
alternative. He stated that he wants to make sure there aren't
any problems arising from Burger King locating on this site and to
protect the interests of the neighborhood.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she shares Councilman
Schneider's concerns. She stated that she is not sure a drive-
through is what this development needs. She stated that this
development was to be a walk-in shopping center and the entire
process is now being changed. She stated that the loadinq area is
beinq changed because it interferes with the drive-through window
which may be a problem. She asked if there was a way to stipulate
that if the drive-through window was a nuisance, it could be
eliminated.
Mr. Herrick stated he would envision that this would be a problem
with the developer, particularly in dealinq with their financing.
He stated that if the financing institution is placing a
substantial weight on a Burger Rinq operation, and if they might
be limited in how they conduct their business, he felt this would
be a situation that may be difficult for the developer to accept.
Mr. Guzy stated that this drive-through will be sheltered from
adjacent properties by the retaining wall and landscaping which he
felt was a "safety factor."
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that it may be a"safety factor,"
but to the neighbors it is an intrusion in their neighborhood and
is something that was not in the plan when it was approved a year
ago. She stated that a retaining wall can be constructed, but
beyond the first few homes, there will be noise reqardless of the
wall. She stated that a walk-in shopping center was approved, and
she cannot live with a drive-throuqh on this site.
Mr. Ericson, the developer, stated that he would suggest a six
month or one year review and would be willing to stipulate to a
� �� �� � 1:. - c •' : i �,_� c:
reasonable escrow that would be initiated with the permanent
financing. He stated that the escrow could be used to address any
problems that may arise once Burger Ring is operatinq. He stated
that the disbursement of the escrow funds could be determined by
the City.
Councilman
areas such
be done or
not work.
Schneider felt that the escrow funds could be used in
as traffic if there is a problem and a study needs to
for costs involving the double baffle system if it does
Mr. Ericson stated he understands that the median is not quaranteed
for any period of time by any City. He asked if there was anything
in place at this time that makes the Council think that the median
system that now exists would not be there when they open the
shopping center.
Councilman Billings stated that, as of this date to the best of
his knowledge, there are no chanqes on the County plan; however,
this does not mean that in the future there will not be a change.
He stated there will be hearinqs that the County will be
conducting, and they may decide to extend the median.
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if the impact of the scheduled
reconstruction at University and Mississippi was taken into
consideration in the traffic study.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that in designing the
intersection, development was reviewed for all four quadrants. He
stated that he did not believe the plans for improvement of the
intersection would have any unforeseen impact on the proposed
development.
Mr. Blue, representinq Burger Kinq, stated that Burger King has
operated at their current facility for the last fifteen years and,
to his knowledge, there has not been any substantiated problems
with the noise or odor, and they do not have a double baffle
filtration system for odors. He stated that there is some fencing
on their property, but no concrete wall, and there is an apartment
building behind their business.
Councilman Fitzpatrick stated that he believed the developer and
Burger King are makinq an honest effort to cooperate in every way
to address the concerns. He stated that, however, the wall would
be a problem for those living on 66th Avenue, as he would not like
the wall outside his door. He felt that the location of a Burger
ICinq on this site would be too intrusive in the neighborhood.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to table this item to later in the
meeting to give the developer and City Attorney an opportunity to
review language relative to an escrow. Seconded by Councilman
FR�DLEY CITY COIINCIL �[EETINQ OF FEBRIIARY �5. 1991 PAG$ 9
Billinqs. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Kayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
3. ORDINANCE NO. 965 ESTABLISHING A NEW CHAPTER OF THE CITY CODE
4F THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, CHAPTER 127. ENTITLED "SEXUALLY
4RIENTED BUSINESSES":
Mayor Nee stated that the Council has had a first readinq of this
ordinance, and some minor chanqes have been incorporated in the
content for the second reading.
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, outlined the minor
chanqes. She stated that under Section 127.02, Definitions, each
definition has been chanqed to include reference to the exclusion
of minors. She stated that under Section 127.09.1.D, the oriqinal
draft required references from two individuals in Anoka County, and
this has been chanqed to require two references from anyone in the
State of Minnesota. She stated that under Section 127.07.A, the
proposed language deletes the original section and proposes that
materials which are defined by Minnesota State Statute to be
"harmful to minors" must be screened from view.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the second readinq and
adopt Ordinance No. 965 on the second readinq. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice'vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
4. R�DIN�NTCE NO. 966 RECODIFYING SECTION 205 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE ENTITLED "ZONING" BY AMENDING SECTIONS 205.14.O1.A,
205.15.O1.A, 205.17.O1.C, AND 205.18.O1.C:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to waive the second reading and
adopt Ordinance No. 966 on second reading and order publication.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
5. ORD�NANCE NO. 967 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER
125, ENTITLED "SAUNAS AND MASSAGE PARLORS", BY AMENDING
SECTION 125.09.06:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the second reading and
adopt Ordinance No. 967 on second readinq and order publication.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
6. APPROVAL OF SUNII�IARY ORDINANCE FOR ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A
NEW CHAPTER OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY. CHAPTER
127, ENTITLED "SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES":
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the Summary Ordinance
FRID Y CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF FEBRIIARY 25. 1991 PAQ$ 10
for Ordinance No. 965 for purposes of publication. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
�. ��yi« muF 1�TNTTTFQ nF m�F P7.ANNING COMMiSSION MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 6. 1991:
A. S�PECIAL USE PERMIT. SP �91-01 BY ST. PHILIP'S LUTHERAN
CHURCH TO ALLOW CHURCHES IN AN R-3 GENERAL MULTIPLE FAMILY
DWELLING DISTRICT, ON OUTLOTS 1 AND 2 AND THE VACATED SERVICE
ROAD BLOCK 2 MOORE LAKE HIGHLANDS 4TH ADDITION GENERALLY
�CATED AT 6180 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, Btated that this special
use permit is requested in order to allow about an 8, 000 square
foot addition to St. Philip's church to the southwest of the
existing structure. She stated that it is proposed that additional
parking will be added on the northwest and northeast sides of the
building. She stated that the first driveway west of the
intersection of West Moore Lake Drive and Highway 65 will be closed
which will greatly enhance the traffic pattern.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planninq Commission has recommended
approval of this special use permit with three stipulations which
she outlined.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and grant Special Use Permit,
SP #91-01, with the following stipulations: (i) The petitioner
shall maintain cross-parking easements with Miller Funeral Home,
and a copy of said easement shall be submitted to the office of
Community Development. If the easement agreement is terminated,
the request shall be reevaluated by the Planning Commission; (2)
A landscape plan meetinq the code requirements shall be submitted
by the petitioner with phased installation indicated on the plan;
and (3) A five foot road easements shall be dedicated to the City
alonq the north property line. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she would abstain from voting
as she is a member of St. Philip's.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE.ABOVE MOTION, Councilman Schneider,
Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Billings and Mayor Nee voted in
favor of the motion. Councilwoman Jorgenson abstained from voting
on the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried.
Councilman Billinqs noted the comment made by Don Betzold, Chairman
of the Planning Commission, regarding the City coordinating the
work schedule for the right turn lane at Highway 65 and West Moore
Lake Drive with the church's construction. He requested that staff
do everythinq they can to coordinate these efforts.
FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL ME$TINa OF FEBRIIARY 25. 1991 PAGB il
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to receive the �inutes of the
Planinq Commission Meetinq of February 6, 1991. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
8. RECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE APPEAIS COMMISSION MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 5. 1991:
A. VARIANCE REOUEST. VAR �90-01, BY ST. PHILIP'S LUTHERAN CHURCH
TO REDUCE THE HARD SURFACE SETBACK FROM 20 FEET TO 15 FEET AND
10 FEET: TO REDUCE THE DRIVING AISLE WIDTH FROM 25 FEET TO 20
FEET AND 22 FEET FOR TWO-WAY TRAFFIC AND FROM 18 FEET TO 15
FEET FOR ONE-WAY TRAFFIC: TO ALLOW THE INTERIOR ALTERATION OF
THE EXISTING BUILDING AND TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN
ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 7,000 S UARE FEET, ON OUTLOTS 1 AND
2. AND THE VACATED SERVICE ROAD, BLOCK 2, MOORE LAKE HIGHLANDS
4TH ADDITION, THE SAME BEING 6180 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that staff
recommends approval of the variances except for the one to reduce
the hard surface setback from a property line from 20 to 15 feet
along the northerly property line for the northwesterly parkinq
lot. She stated that there is another alternative which would not
necessitate a variance. She stated that reductions in the widths
for the two-way and one-way drivinq aisles should not be a problem.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Appeals Commission recommended approval
of the variances.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation
of the Appeals Commission and qrant Variance Request, VAR �90-01.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, Councilman
Schneider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Mayor Nee voted in favor of
the motion. Councilwoman Jorgenson abstained from votinq on the
motion. Councilman Billings was absent when the vote was taken.
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried.
9. VARIANCE RE4UEST. VAR �k90-32, BY FIRST WESTERN DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION (TABLED 2f11/91):
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to table this item to March 4,
1991. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
10. A��roval OF REVISED COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN FOR 100 OSBORNE
ROAD N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, etated that the Siqn
Ordinance requires Council approval of a sign plan for multi-tenant
buildings in excess of three tenants. She stated that staff
recommends approval of this sign plan.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINt3 OF FBBRQARY 25, 1991 PAQ$ iZ
Councilman Billinqs Btated that he would like somethinq from the
owner and his attorney indicatinq what the siqn plan consists of
so there is no misunderetanding.
MOTION by Councilman Billinqs to table this item to March 4, 1991.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. �ONSIDERATION OF THE 1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
APPLICATION:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the 1991 CDBG
application with $77,848 committed to the Riverview Heiqhts project
and $38,835 committed to human services; and to authorize staff to
trade funds with the City of Coon Rapids. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider.
Councilman Billings stated that he wondered how advantageous it
might be to divert funds for human services into other areas
because of budget cuts by the State and a reduction in funding to
the City.
Ms. Dacy felt that it may be a good idea to have a planning process
to determine the City's objectives for the 1992 CDBG allocation.
She stated that because this is a Federal qrant there are certain
requirements as far as capital improvement projects are concerned.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that it is her understanding that
President Bush is looking at allocating CDBG funds directly to the
State. She stated that this may result in a decrease of the
funding for next year.
Councilman Billings stated that this is why he felt priorities for
this fundinq should probably be reviewed. He stated that when he
served on the Human Resources Commission, one of the guidelines
used for distribution of these funds was to use the funds as seed
money to beqin projects. He stated that the Commission did not
want it to be long-term financing for projects. He etated that it
seems the same organizations receive financing over and over, and
there is not any growth of new human services in the community.
Councilman Billings stated that if CDBG funds are no longer
available, these organizations depend tremendously on the City, and
if the City does not come up with property tax money, the
organizations would disappear. He stated that he certainly
understands the needs in the human services area, but questions how
many layers of qovernment have to provide human services in the
state.
Ms. Dacy stated that the test for CDBG funds is that they must
benefit low and moderate income persons or be used for the removal
of slum and blight. She stated that she knows the Human Resources
�RIDLEY CITY COONCIL MEETINQ OF FEBR ARY 25, 1991 PAQ$ 13
Commission has the same concern expressed by Councilman Billings.
She stated that Steve Barq has written_an article in the Focus
encouraqinq new applications. Ms. Dacy said she believed the
Commission wants to set out on the qoa1B to which Councilman
Billinqs has eluded.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she would be willing to work
with the Human Resources Commission and Councilman Billings
regardinq the possibility of diverting these funds into other
areas. She stated that there are a number of ways these funds can
be used in the community.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
r � � �� ��1+4-�� �; 4� � ; �• � �
� �
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for
the skid-steer loader and cold planer:
Planholder
Lano Equipment
3021 West 133rd St.
Shakopee, 1rIIJ 55379
Big Bear Equipment, Inc.
10405 MJ" Street
Omaha, NE 68127
Aggregate Construction
P. O. Box 3094
Des Moines, IA 50316
Total Bid
$22,790.00
$24,862.00
$29,900.00
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that Lano Equipment was
the low bidder for this equipment at $22,790.00. He stated that
the bid was for $19, 810.14 for the skid-steer loader, $9,179. 86 for
the cold planer, less a$6,200 trade-in allowance for the 1974
Walden Loader. He stated that $23,500 has been budqeted for this
equipment in the Capital Outlay Budqet, and it is recommended that
Lano Equipment be awarded the contract.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for the skid-
steer loader and cold planer to the low bidder, Lano Equipment, in
the amount of $22,790.00. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
�RIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF FEBRIIARY 25. 1991 PAG$ 14
;_ � � ; �;� •�4��� '•� 4�. � �l�,r
; �r �
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive the followinq bids for
the 1991 tree and stump removal:
Company
Arps Tree Service
17845 Hanson Boulevard
Anoka, 1�1 55304
Whitesell Tree Service
321 - 109th Avenue NW
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Tree Size
0 - 5.9" DBH
6" - 7.9" DBH
8" - 9.9" DBH
10" - 11.9" DBH
12" - 13.9" DBH
14" - 15.9" DBH
16" - 17.9" DBH
18" - 19.9" DBH
Total Bid
$ 36.00
$ 54.00
$ 75.00
$ 99.00
$126.00
$156.00
$184.50
$220.00
Per 2" increment
over 20" DBH $ 30.00
0 -
6"
8"
10"
12"
14"
16"
18p
Pe
5.9" DBH
- 7.9" DBH
- 9.9" DBH
- 11.9" DBH
- 13.9" DBH
- 15.9" DBH
- 17.9" DBH
- 19.9° DBH
r 2" increment
over 20" DBH
$ 59.00
$ 79.00
$ 99.00
$119.00
$139.00
$159.00
$215.80
$238.80
$ 15.00
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that Arps Tree Service was
the low bidder for various tree sizes, and it is recommended that
they be awarded the 1991 tree and stump removal contract.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to award the contract for the 1991
tree and stump removal to the low bidder, Arps Tree Service.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
14. $,PPROVAL OF DISPOSITION OF TAX FORFEIT LAND IN FRIDLEY:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated notice has been received
from the Anoka County Land Commissioner that four parcels of land
will become tax forfeit. He stated that parcels identified as 1
and 2 are in the flood plain and only 50 feet wide. He stated that
these properties should be sold to abutting property owners for
additional qreen area. He stated that Parcels 3 and 4 are
buildable, with some creative engineerinq and planninq, and should
be sold for development.
FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF FEBRIIARY 25. 1991 PAa$ 15
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the disposition of
these parcels as follows: Parcels 1 and 2 to be sold to abuttinq
property owners for additional qreen area and Parcels 3 and 4 are
buildable and should be eold for development. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
15. APPROVAL OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE .5 MG WATER TANK
PAINTINGIALTITUDE VALVE AND VAULT INSTALLATION, PROJECT NO.
212;
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that HNTB has prepared the
plans and specifications for the .5 MG water tank paintinq/altitude
valve and vault installation. He stated that in order to
coordinate the planninq and improvements to the .5 MG tank with
the online installation of the 1.5 MG tank, there should be an
early bid so the contractors can coordinate the various
construction activities.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the advertisement for
bids for the .5 MG water tank paintinq/altitude valve and vault
installation, Project No. 212. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
16. RESOLUTION N0. 21-1991 ESTABLISHING A WATER CONSERVATION
�ROGRAM FOR THE STJNIlKER OF 1991:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 21-1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
17. RESOLUTION NO. 22-1991 ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS:
REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE CURB. GUTTER
AND SIDEWALK - 1991:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 22-1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
18. RESOLUTION NO. 23-1991 ORDERING PRELIMINARY PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES OF THE COSTS THEREOF: STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST 1991 - 2:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that this project involves
the widening of 73rd Avenue from Symphony to Baker Street. He
stated that the proj ect will include the widening of 73rd to 50
feet, construction of a bikeway along the south edqe of 73rd
Avenue, a bikeway through the Tarqet Distribution Center property,
and construction of a bikeway alonq the west side of University
Avenue from 73rd to the Community Park.
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF FEBRIIARY 25. 1991 PAQB 16
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 23-1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorqenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimouBly.
• • � �e �' � '�' �
•• �_ • s �� 4:_ Ys
• i • �i � • • � � �r ' � • .sr� � - '-
Y'�• _�� '�� � •
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 24-1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all votinq
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
20. RE�.^..Tr?.'�'3^*t u^ ���� 991 pRAVTDING ASSISTANCE TO CERTAIN
EMa�n,vy�c nF mKF' rTTY (')F FRTn7�F.Y WHO ARE CALLED TO SERVICE
DURING THE CURRENT CONFLICT BETWEEN IRAO AND THE UNITED STATES
AND ITS ALLIES:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this resolution is to provide
assistance to employees of the City who are regularly employed for
thirty hours or more per week and have been called to active duty.
He stated that the City shall pay the difference between the
employee's total military compensation and the regular wages which
the employee otherwise would have received from the City. He
stated that the resolution also provides for those employees who
are eligible for the flexible benefit program and who wish to
continue in it during their involuntary military service, that the
City, for a period not to exceed Bix months, shall continue its
contribution to whichever option had been chosen prior to the
employee's call to active military service.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 25-1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
21. APPOINTMENT TO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY:
Mayor Nee stated that he has received Walter Rasmussen's
resignation from the HRA due to illness and asked that the Council
receive this resignation.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive Walter Rasmussen's
resignation from the HRA. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
Mayor Nee stated that he wished to appoint J. R. McFarland,
President of the Northeast State Bank of Minneapolis, Columbia
Heights, and Coon Rapids. He stated that prior to this position,
Mr. McFarland was an officer of Grover's National Bank, as well as
other banks, and has an extensive background in insurance and
finance. He stated that he believed Mr. McFarland would be a qreat
�RIDLSY CITY COIINCIL MEETINa OF FEHRIIARY 25, 1991 PAQ$ 17
asset to the HRA and requested the Council's concurrence with this
appointment.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to concur with Mayor Nee's
appointment of J. R. McFarland to the HI2A. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
2. AMENDMENT TO THE ADOPTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
�'�2IDLEY TOWN SOUARE DEVELOPMENT. TO CONSZDER ADDING A DRIVE-
THROUGH WINDOW FOR A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT ON THE WEST SIDE
QF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THE PROPERTIES INCLUDED IN THIS
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ARE 355 MISSISSIPPI STREET. 368 - 66TH
AVENUE, AND 6525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE (�ABLED EARLIER):
Mayor Nee removed this item from the table for further discussion
by the Council.
Mr. Guzy, attorney representinq the developer, stated the developer
has agreed that he would escrow $10,000 six months after occupancy
for a period of two years. He stated that there shall be a site
review by the City staff and the developer every six months durinq
the two-year escrow period. He stated that the City may correct
any violations of stipulations which are not corrected by the
developer to the satisfaction of the City within thirty days after
notice to the developer.
Mr. Guzy stated that in regard to the traffic, the City staff shall
have the absolute right to request a traffic study after one year
to be funded by the escrow money. He Btated that if there are
traffic problems, as determined by the study, modifications on the
developer's site, as needed, shall be paid for by the developer.
Councilman Schneider asked about any other problems that were not
addressed.
Mr. Guzy stated that this would not take away from Burger King's
obligation to review the hours of operation.
Councilman Schneider questioned if there is an understanding that
Burger King would adjust their hours if there are problems, would
this be enforceable.
Mr. Herrick stated that he believed it was enforceable; however,
he felt it would have to involve more than one fncident. He stated
that if problems occurred over an established period of time Burger
Ring could be notified that the type of clients they have is
disturbing the neighborhood and request that they honor the letter
to shorten the hours of operation.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to amend the amendment to the
Redevelopment Plan by adding four additional stipulations as
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL MESTING OF FEHRIIARY 25. 1991 pAaS 18
follows: (1) The developer shall escrow $10,000 six months after
occupancy for a period of two years; (2) There shall be a site
review by City staff and the developer each six-month period during
the two-year escrow period; (3) The City may correct any violations
of stipulations not corrected by the developer to the satisfaction
of the City within thirty days after notice to the developer; (4)
The City staff shall have the absolute riqht to request a traffic
study after one year to be funded by escrow money and, if there are
traffic problems, as determined by the study, modifications on the
developer's property as needed shall be paid for by the developer.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, Councilman
Schneider, Councilman Billings, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Mayor
Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilwoman Jorqenson voted
against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried.
Mr. Ohlsson, 376 - 66th Avenue, stated that a number of the
neighboring residents have not appeared this evening because they
made their comments known at the Planning Commission meeting, and
it is documented in the minutes. He stated that many felt it was
redundant to reiterate their opposition to the shopping center
pertaining to traffic problems, noise, and odors.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to amend Stipulation No. 1 of the
original ten stipulations of this amendment to the Redevelopment
Plan as follows: (1) The screening wall shall be extended to
University Avenue. The landscapinq plan shall be revised to add
additional Evergreens aZonq 66th Avenue and Ivy plantings along the
wall. A three-foot continuous hedge and trees for every fifty feet
of driveway should also be provided along University Avenue.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, Councilman
Billings, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman Schneider and Mayor
Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilwoman Jorqenson voted
against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried.
UPON A ROLL CALL VOTE TAKEN ON THE ORIGINAL MOTION TO APPROVE THE
AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE 10 STIPULATIONS (AS
SHOWN IN THE MINUTES ON PAGES 5 AND 6), Councilman Billings, Mayor
Nee and Councilman Schneider voted in favor of the motion.
Councilman Fitzpatrick and Councilwoman Jorgenson voted against the
motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 3 to 2 vote.
22. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
There were no informal status reports.
23. CLAIMS:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claims No.
36289 through 36498. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
�
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETIN�i OF FEBRIIARY 25. 1991 PAt�$ 19
24. LICENSES:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the licenses as submitted
and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
25. ESTIMATES:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as
submitted:
Newquist � Ekstrum, Chartered
301 Fridley Plaza Office Buildinq
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Services Rendered as City Prosecuting
Attorney for the Month of November, 1990 ..$ 8,172.00
Services Rendered as City Prosecuting
Attorney for the Month of December, 1990 ..$ 7,206.00
HNTB
6700 France Avenue South
Minneapolis, l�IId 55435
1. Inspection of the 1.5 MG
Elevated Water Reservoir
Project No. 202
Partial Estimate. . . . . . . . . . . . $ 704.00
2. Design and Improvements to
Well No. 12 & 63rd Avenue
Booster Station, Project No. 204
Partial Estimate. . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,837.12
Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. (PDM)
P. O. Box 1596
Des Moines, IA 50306
Construction of the 1.5 MG
Water Reservoir, Project No. 201
Estimate No. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $37, 872 . 98
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL IiEETINa OF FEBRIIARY Z5. 1991 PAa$ ZO
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meetinq. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all votinq aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Reqular Meeting
of the Fridley City Council of February 25, 1991 adjourned at 9:35
p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
� .� - - .., :
:�.-..:
,!/M �.: ��� :�:�� • � • , � i�- ����s„i:��l4=j
� p�►TBC,'T I�D. BT, 1991 - 2
�8, the City Cb�uycil of the City of �7idley. Anoka CbuntY. Min�ota► has
de�ned it expedies�t to r+eoeive evider�oe �,+?; r?r? to the inp�r°v�a�s
hex�eit�after d�e.sGrib�d.
1�7W, �, 1�UTICS: Z8 �BY GI9El�i �T an the 4th day of Marcii, 1991, at
7:30 p.m. the City oc�u�cil will meet at the Fridley Irb.uzicipal Oent�e,r Qo�u�cil
Q�ambers, 6431 University Ave. , N. E. , FYidley, P'Ild, ar�d wi11 at said t,ime and
place hear all parties interested in said iaQrovaoer►ts in �le or in gazt.
Zlie ger�eral nature of the inprove�exrts is the oonstructian ( in tl�e lanis ar�d
streets noted belc�w) of the follvwir�g iaQrvve�nts, t�o�witt
• � -� • �
Street improvements, includirg gradir�q. stabilized base, hot�aix bitumir�ous mat,
concrete curb ar�d gutter, sidewalks, bik�.way, storm sew�er syste�n, water ar�d
sanitaxY sew�er, 1�P�1, ���' facilities locat�ed as follaws:
gTR�T p!�►TDC.'T I�D. 8T. 1991 - 2
73� Ave�ue, N.B. Sy��Y Bt�eet to Bak'e� 8t�eet
(M3A8 I�b. 307 )
For oonstn�ctian Item
All of the latYi abuttirg � sa.id street.s named above and all latxis within,
adj acent at�d abuttir�q t2yere�tro •
All of said lar�d to be assessed pi�opoztionately avoordirg to the benefits
reoeived by s�x� it�roveoent.
Published: �RIDI.EY F�OQJS:
Febxt�aty 20, 1991
Febn�aty 27, 1991
1
� -
' r-��, � � . ; 2 . 3 . � • � ' i
II , .... ...��. ...... .`.. .. �
... ....
C!- �---'— ,�'-�j•�.�, -'°�."-' CITY OF FRIDLEY � � -
i . , .: .: : :.�. �;� � ..... �«.....Y.,.,�.. voTiHc
ti `� .': = • .•�- •?: �;; � , � � SCF�
' -- ^ , �
. ,.. . .;•'� ;'.. . . � �. �. -- -. .t.iu._rneua�
� .:�..':; • . . : . .: ;, , _ , . — OtSTRICTS � � I OR�TfitC �
� ..�„�•.!.:.,.�::,;•,?T-: ....a..... ....� , .. �.� ,
-�i � �.•.� • ..: s .� ... y
��\�I�.I �, w � �V: = � M��tir ���
. 1. � .��1�1I �`,.,�,�'� � �lw�r� •���. •� ��Y.� � � -
A — � , Y.I-� � 1� i' � .; �,7�� a � :::: :y.i ' ' ' � I .� �
. �� �� � � . � -. ;; � � � -- � , � _.... _ .
,�,; ;; �_ �
1 � •' 1 �' .1..� I� M r �� �r ~♦
`` , � ✓:'•� , � Y '. � �� ' � ��^� �� . y �� M� w ~ . I � •
.��:�;�� ' � :..,� �
9%�^ �� l� � �_�. • z'•�`\I I � � �
. �^ �` ir•''�, 1�.1, � � —t ' w .�.� ...� ' �« . �� r '�"
�� '� � � i.^ �a- :� �_ ^i �1 �,� ._.. � �...... - � -� '�', . i r � 7
' '�''� �` �� � ��.. ___. _6�`E"�,.' — : _ ......._..� � �' � �—�._
- „+ � ........ . • .. _
: � �` � -� `""' r� •� I _ e� ...... �. __"''_L_
' � � �.,:��?� �`�� � =:' f�� ;—;�, _ : ..: r: ; , _ . , _ �
\ �` 1'�, _?-+!i'L�� . � - �_ : .�. . i Ti = � t 1 .- �... . .. �.. ...�� w.�w '
.; � �. �� -....
g� � s ' -- • .�......._.. r. w.ua
� ; � ..... �»...
\ ,t, ;!.s�.i` ��w.� � ;� 1, �F•• �� j� .c� �., v
; ., • : /,�. '. 1 I nr ' �=' i ' ., w. «..
\• � . .. - .�J.._I .� i� �I . s � �
_„`.• : . : ;/_"�_''': _ T f - ._ ._..��. r r S,p�M�
\,' ; '/. ,,—; . I�:_.. � II •� �..��.., , 1 a' I I ' i L�
\ � _ ' " !.' ��!� J �l L��� � ��►_{ i�� � � ���_zy�:. 'm-���� .
1 � " '���'' - � �.1-- _�`-�.: _ __ . _-_�, � ���� � —: ,�_.
b`'�7� � `'!. ����� r.r-�i � � _ �: ', t� .. ,I I ..._ i ,�; `� � =� .+_.._
� d� i. _.. , �- r.-... �--��� ,�------;-�.-�=1 Ii �'
� ' � -" -- .� _ = _.. :� . ,� -' _�_— � .._ � ;�=- _ t `^ 1 ��, .
c � __ � �^ — ' _ _; L.' _�.:�; � _=_;_ � � - _"f `� s =- . _ r'•
- -�-.�,�`; . - --y� �, _ _=�..j± . ./i �= _ . . _ i -: t , , .. -.'.
��. �' s� Ji !,— — i ��,, ' ,� ¢, ".( `-.�'=fi['`1T ����Jt .
N �-- = `;r� ; -- +; _._ ;i , _1 ...;' ,: . .-� , , :. � •^.t. � I ; .,�r_-� :.�:.,:3 �, . �.
'• ..,, : _ _ - t, ' •.;., �. ,'; � t �'— � + -�
, ' -�: :.�-Ci1 • �� , I! 1 ! ._. i__:� __ '-'= � �� --
�.-�_., c;, .�L.... � -I�r. • .��� �
� / .��• ... � /� � � �i3rM�c=,�` �.` �_ � i
�„�;..._...;rE . ,--.--.�j: , �: � j � __�. — _ ;; .
..... � ,. . , �! �
�2 ti•� / ��k'.,�--.•�.i � 5� � I--- .i 1 i� ...........
p � : 1��-y�i - — : - — �r ��� a
:: , ,
�+ J/�—�+'!� �—
• J � •/ . �'��)y��^�^1�'T _ J�:�.�'�:� �,� �����• �-= � � ���.' �\�+.
il �f� �'�� %-.. _ � . � a �' � • ��� r�. 1� • .
�`;`: N���:��� � ►�. -�-e�— • -��I� c � •� • � �• � ' � ?I `L'`
� ��^'' �,"�.� , \ - _ ' • �� � � ���• f �\`
� I � ti�� �� �'�t�DV';,�' F'• i •' •� o . ,' , •. .. ' -- - , -- '
';� � 'fi';�: ° w py � e• � . n \
' w�l ^� i '�.. `, � � �• �I _ _ a • � :1 �r�.��, ` � � � � ' �+� �ui s
a j� :L..;{l{ .�` �[1','. �' � � s, � � ��' . � �-� , /' � '�L,11 �!'` �`� U�''"*�
a f - . � "•.�_ `�/• �; . �, �j � � ``�,; . �
�n .� ~� : ,17 � \1 f;�l ���:� �
N � .�J �y t•. 5 ;' �:� ���! � I ?i?� � -h��� v
E _ v� ' =� � � , � ' �J s/� � `;' - I'.'.r 1 �, v �
� ����� - .� � � ' � y ' 1�� •u ,I :a [
,. ��4�.� �� �i I � ;;� ;, � = ;
�,� ;��: J, �o� .,_� [L
- -- -- � -`�� ��I ��' y' _ � � �. _ - •-�w ` �-. � � L- l, � � "'�
..�.. � w... ' �' 1 .. � �i � � � i� � 1I I :,; � I
�/�\��rl � � ,� � ��� 31 � ���_ l ��{..�r 1�I�
�,� " �� `. � � • a�
I \�---x"; i �� �� .._ _ ; ��r"�- _
y ? � � � � t� I � �i\
• �,,,
r ; � �s � ��j' += � I � � i __ �� , � s C
F ���'_�.-'LJ � ,u� � , -. c: . i
.' � O � :�..i.j•j' �_ � �L�. � j� •
��_ �;�8 � , � ; � _ . d � ^ s..,:; - �, �-
e ��' i '' .j • � •�-�t;i':•" :;. r �� - j r
j .��.,� � _-= :� a � __ � o_ .,!; ,�. - -
( 3; �v' ; `�� t% �. � w i=".;�' 'ii�'� r �� (
• i C--..�-.. F ' . . ? � . �. �::: �s• � � 1
?'�•�E^ `�� ��«�Fi� `I I'� � II I� ��__ = -= =_ �'��• � E •� \.'�
C.' ^�+'. ) '•° �.��� r�'k ulJ -_.' --� .7r= +r L�K iI •
i . ;'�°� ' • ^� -- "j'' =__"_- _ `.' •: RE a _ ... .�
� �'.'r = � i
,�:' -'' �:,_;I - �W = "_ -_- = r°° ; � =.�j.:
o : �� � �; : .r� - - -� :_ � • f �i� ��: � —
. j °�° C��i • �. �' � •� _;. .
= ' �' %' ��. t �__ �'��
� �, _.-�;_ a�� ���, � ..,:: �,� :.
, � � �- � �: �o ��{� ,� .,� :::::.:�: �� ���.:�_
r ii: ,,� ,' ,; i � 1 r' ra .;:.""' :: � � s.
' � �%- � --- -a: •-� ,11 `0 .. ,iZ�.��.
'.� ,� '�, �-.-=�_�: � �CQ
, �, ;
�
.
_ :r-��.
%� l/'
/ . i ;, � k
,�,� ''; ,�`_ ���� ---- � �� :;�:'-+� �
—�--=,�.�.. .,� = , _ fsf\ " ! :_ ' :�;I �' : f �= �
, �
.
.r--- . ]
, 1 , � � --s� —� _� /.-. � _ �:�:. , . . �v. .
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
�r
MEMORANDUM
TO:
WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER/�•���
FROMs RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCE DIRECTOR
SIIBJECT: TAB INCREMENT/SCHOOL LEVY AGREEMENTS
DATE: March 1, 1991
Attached are the agreements that you requested to be placed on the
agenda for Monday evening. As I stated in previous communications,
the HRA has reviewed the situation and agreed to return the full
amount of the tax increments associated with the school district
levy referendums that will be payable in 1991. Although, there was
extensive discussion regarding putting a cap on the limitation on
these funds; the HRA did agree that because of the timing of this
agreement it would beneficial to return all increments for this
next year.
Also, there is an attachment that provides an estimate based on the
tax capacity from 1990 as to what the total return would be for
1991. At this point in time, we still have not received tax values
from the County so we are unable to provide a more accurate
estimate of what the increment would be for tax attributable to
1991.
If you need any additional information, please feel free to contact
me.
RDP/me
Attachment(s)
z
C
c0 �
.... 7
� �
�
N
c
d
�
Q
C
.�
�
C
�
0
E
Q
� �
7 U N
� fC v
N � �
� U �
� � �
N
�,
�i �i � %
� � � d
N � V �
�U �>
U
0
c
d
�
N
U
C
H
y
�
�
�
C
d
N
N
Q
0
N
�
O
�
v
� O C�O � O C�O N
r�ni � ° r�i d °v a°o
� � � ti �
0 0 0 0
O O O O
� n � n
o � o �
O O
m 0
� N
Q Q
� �
Z Z
M M
A 7�
T
m
� J
� -
V �
'C c0
H
� �
O �
L O
� �
m 0
� N
Q Q
� �
0 0
Z Z
r� ch
� �
T
>
d
J
�
�
�
�
�
O
2A
�
�
O
N
N
d
�
v
c7 C7 � � QO
N �A CM Ch a0
O O � � �'
N N � � �
� � � � N
N O O N N� C�7 CO ��� � d
��� � a0 � O d O� � � c0
ao ao o rn N N �� a n co
.- ao c�i ri � rn ri ri �
� M .- � M CO
0 0 0 o a` o 0
N a a ��� O O O
(p Z Z I� n 1� CD GD CD
o�o c�c c�o
� N �
U
Q � w
a� � m
Y
� � C
J � O
y y �
C m
� 7 J
N et CO
� � �
� �
v v
Q Q
Z Z
T
N
e9 J
� -
U �
'C tA
N
0 �
O �
t O
� �
� � �
� °v c�c
N �
U
Q�w
m � m
Y
J � �O
mya
C N
� � J
N st GO
� � �
�
m
J
�
n
�
i�
�
�
aMO c�o c�Oc
�°vc�o
N �
U
a8w
0
m � m
J � �O
mya
C m
� � J
N � CO
� � �
[O
�
�
�
C�
i�H
�
O
�
c
Tv �
F�- �
�
y
C
N
7
Q
C
.�
0
C
�
O
E
Q
� �
� v i^y
a�i � �
� U �
� � �
H
�
�i �i m ^
c � n v
'� � �
aU �
�U �>
�"'
U
ti,
0'
E
N
U
C
�
N
E
7
�
C
d
N
d
�
tn � d a�0 O (�D
lA t.f) C7 � O �
� C�O N �! �
� � ch N N
0 0 0 0
c� Ch c7 M a
CV N N CV Z
c0 O c7 c') �
f� � d CO N
1� � tn CO N
CO a N C'7 N
� f� d � .-
� �
�
m
v
¢ Q `C po C7
>+ T � � 'p
CUU J o 3
� d � N �
O C
O L
U U � � t=
� � N d t0
� � � � �
� �
Q
Z
N �`
J �
'0' - J
� � _
U � �
- CO N
y
� � �
0 O e`�
L N N
� ��
� 00 � N 1�
(O 1� M tA O
d CO a0 O CD
O� V � a0 cD
O � I� c7 a0
� �
� �- N r
0 0 0 0 0
M e') M M c')
� � � � �
� � �
00 O M C'7 l.f)
I� O� d CO N
I` : � � a0 N
(D sT N c7 N
O) f� � � �
� �
�
m
a ¢ a � �
0
a � m � �
.r Y
U U � 0 3
N � m � N
o G
L
UU�-��i�
� � N d a0
A � � 3t �t
..�..
T
>
N
J
�
�
C7
n
�
�
N
�
�
0
�
c�
�
c�o
M O
CO CC
� �
ri �
� �
� C�0 0�p O O O
O N eT O O O
CO 00 �
ri ri �
C7 r-
o'��oy'QQ<
�p�p�pZZZ
C� O Crl N c7 O
CO �(f � M h
O � d: N �
N O GO �A �
M N r � �
�A N �
Y Y
� _
m�Uco m m
C7 U �
m m � a
Q Q L � � U
O O c�0 � � O
zza3oz
����a��
� � � � � �
� v v .�. i
Q
Z
<O J J
iF - =
V � �
'� 1A �O
�
� � �
t O N
� .- a
c�''c v
cc o
� �
v c°N�
H
O CO
O CO
�-
�O
�O
H
t�0 N
� �
� �
a �
�
y
t0
F
•
_�
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
.�
0
�
�
0
�
a
� �
� V N
� fd v
C a
d � �
y U �
� � �
H
�
�i �i � •-
...
c � a
•� c� a�
aU ?
�U c�>
�
U
N
�
C
N
E
�
U
C
H
U �
y
C
7 � C O
'<c U
c � a� �v
Y
N Z N C
� O � ¢
Ov
�
�
E
O
cv
01
C
.�
�
N
cv
�
�
U
R
a
�v
U
� o
h- �
� U
O �
'�
� W
O
a`� --
c a�i
O �
U ...
� ro
�
3 aai
��
> �
a� Y
J
N �
� �
� �
N
F n
�
a�
i�
�
a�
�
O
0
.a
�
N
O
a
a
�
d
3
d
.�
d
�
�
c6
�
a
a
m
O �
c ;_
o r.
�
�q U
a 3
C
N i
d
`a> 'L'
� �
N m
t Y
F-
� �
0
.D
N
N
�
c0
U
O
c
f6
7
�
�
a
v
�
O ^
��
v�i Qi
a� �
� �
O O
m c�
� y
A �
ao
T �
U �
_ y
.m >
O .?
� y
¢
�
m
m
U
h
U
.y
0
�
H
0
T
a
a
m
0
c
�
m
0
�
O
C
O
�
.�
a
�
7
�
�
�
m
� �
� �
m �
� T
� �
�
m `m
� �
�
v
a
a�
t
= c
c m
> >
c � m
� m �O �
� � L
.� C ..+
� � T
fC
m � a
L � O
� � �
� m �
m m
� a U
0
y Q c
E m
o c m
.� a n
� O
� J yN
O
� � m
N �
m .
C � �
m�
� � �
m
� a 3C
C �
j C Y
C Y �
m �m �C ._.
�
�
2C
2D
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is dated as of January 2, 1991, is
by and between the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent
School District No. 11, and provides as follows:
1. Definitions. As used in this Aqreement, the
followinq terms have the followinq meanings, respectively:
"Citv" means the City of Fridley,
Minnesota.
" I�PR " means the Housinq and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Fridley,
Minnesota.
"Project" means Redevelopment Project No.
1 established and operated by the HRA pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001
throuqh 469.047.
"1985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's
$4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of
1985, dated May 1, 1985.
"Limited Revenue Note" means the HRA's
$5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital
Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated
December 20, 1985.
"1985 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General
Obliqation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985,
dated December 30, 1985.
"1986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment
Refundinq Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of
Auqust 1, 1986.
"1990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$9,485,000 General Obligation Tax Increment
Refundinq Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990.
"Tax Increment Obliaations" means the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note,
the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the
1990 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual
obliqations of the HRA or the City which were
entered into prior to the date of this
9T05
2E
Aqreement and which commit the use of any tax
increments from the TIF Districts for
specified purposes, projects, or parties.
„Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179.
"TIF Districts" means Tax Increment
Financinq District Nos. 1 throuqh 10 within
the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains
certification dates and other information on
the TIF Districts.
"School District" means Independent
School District No. 11, the Anoka School
District.
"Subdivision" means Minnesota Statutes
Second 1989 Supplement, Section 469.177,
Subdivision 10, as amended by Laws of
Minnesota 1990, Chapter 604, Article 7,
Section 24 (a copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit B).
2. Recitals.
(a) In certain cases, the Subdivision
either requires or allows by agreement certain
tax increments attributable to school district
referendum tax levies to be paid to school
districts.
(b) A portion of TIF District No. 3 is
located within the boundaries of the School
District.
(c) None of the property within TIF
District Nos. l, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10
is located within the boundaries of the School
District.
(d) It is the purpose of this Aqreement
to provide for payment of certain tax
increments to the School District pursuant to
and in accordance with the provision of the
Subdivision. �
(e) Nothinq in this Agreement is
intended to violate the covenants and
agreements heretofore made respectinq the
application of
9705 2
2F
tax increments from the TIF Districts pursuant to
the Tax Increment Obligations.
3. sg�esentations of the Citv.
(a) The Tax Increment Obliqations were
issued to finance various activities of the
HR,A within the Project.
(b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not
general obligations of the City or the HRA.
Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1
through 5 are pledged to the payment of the
1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other
sources of funds pledqed to the payment
thereof. The final scheduled principal
maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February
1, 1999.
(c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a
general obligation of the City or the HRA and
is payable solely from tax increments pledged
for such purposes from TIF District No. 6.
(d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable
from tax increments derived'from TIF District
Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled
principal maturity of those Bonds was February
1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the
City discharqed the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying
all then outstanding principal thereof and
interest thereon.
(e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from
tax increments derived from TIF District Nos.
1 through 6, and the f inal scheduled principal
maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000.
However, the City has advance refunded the
1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990
G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to
said refundinq that all of the principal of
and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have
been paid on or before February 1, 1994.
(f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from
tax increments derived from TYF District Nos.
1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled
principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1,
2009.
(q) Portions of the principal of the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note,
9T05 3
2G
the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds,
and the 1990 G.O. Bonds were outstandinq on
May 1, 1988, and/or are outstandinq on the
date of this Aqreement.
4. Re� esentations of the School District.
(a) On October 5, 1982, the electorate
of the School District approved a continuous
6.0 mill levy first effective for the 1982
payable 1983 property taxes. This levy is
hereinafter referred to as the "1982 Levy".
(b) On October 6, 1987, the electorate
of the School District approved a 6.0 mill
continuous levy first effective for the 1987
payable 1988 property taxes. This levy is
hereinafter referred to as the "1987 Levy".
(c) Accordinq to the Minnesota
Department of Education, for purposes of the
above-mentioned referendum levies the tax
capacity rate equivalent of 6 mills is
.06999697.
5. �ayment of Tax Increments to School District. The
City and the School District hereby agree that, except as
otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement,
tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA
as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the
tax increments relatinq to the 1990 payable 1991 property
taxes, as follows:
TZF District No. 3. Pursuant to clause
b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment
from TIF District No. 3 which is attributable
to the 1982 Levy and the 1987 Levy shall be
paid to the School District.
6. Further Aareements. Nothinq in this Aqreement is
intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate
the obliqations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in
connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the
extent but only to the extent that the application of the
terms of this Aqreement would give rise to a violation of said
obliqations and covenants, including without limitation, the
default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment
Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied
instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to
avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or
obligations. Nothinq in this Agreement shall restrict the
9705
4
2H
City or the iiRA in the exercise of the powers which they may
have relatinq to the Project or the TZF Districts.
In addition, the City and the School District aqree that
the provisions of paraqraph 5 providinq for payment of tax
increment to the School District shall be limited to and shall
apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1990
payable 1991 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion
of said period, the City and the School District aqree to
review the circumstances and to attempt to neqotiate in qood
faith such further aqreement or aqreements as may be permitted
by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School
District with respect to discretionary payments of such
applicable tax increment to the School District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have
caused this Aqreement to be executed by their duly authorized
representatives.
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
Mayor
City Manager
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11
School Board Chair
Superintendent
9T05
5
EXHIBIT A
Schedule of Tax Increment Financinq Districts
Within iiousinq and Redevelopment
Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA
TIF District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
9705
Name
Center City
Moore Lake
North Area
Johnson Printinq/
Skywood Mall
Paschke
Lake Pointe
Winf ield
Shorewood
Onan/Old Central
Northco Phase III
Certif ication
Date
5/11/79
7/31/81
5/19/82
1/20/84
3/15/84
12/24/85
10/22/86
10/24/86
9/7/89
4/10/90
Independent
School
District No.
14
13/14
11/16
13/14
16
13
16
14
16
16
21
2J
EXHIBIT B
Sec. 2C. �i--esc:a Stat�:es Stcc-d 1959 5_lg�e-e�t,
sec::cz :53.:77, s_hdivisic� 10► :s a�e��ed ;o :esd:
S':=d. :�. ('rnY:!=�i ^0 SC-C�CL rCR �E:_Ri'��'v'i L=�: ) (a 'a~!
-:c••is:c-s c: ::�is sLbc?visic� ai:?� :o tax .-c:e-.e-t fi'a'�1',�
c's;:'_c's a-d rso;ec:s :cr ��'_c'� cer:ificat?c� �as res�_es:ed .
�e?c:e "ay !, 1SE8� t`nt a:e ?eca;ed :� a sc.`.oel d:s:r:ct i�
_iici ;=e •:c;e:s 1:a�e a:rrcved -ev tax caracity rates cr a� '
i-c:ease :� :ax cn:acity :a:es a::er tre :az i-crerer.: fi^a^ci'g •
cistr:c: -as certified.
_ �51 (1) i: tt:ere a:e. -:o oc:stz-di::q �^c��s c� Hay l, 19E8, �
to -y?ci i:.c:e:e::t f:ca t�e d:s;r?ct is �?e�Sed, er {?3 ii t'�e
re?�:e-c_� ?s zr:zc�ed af:er !!ay 1,' 1986, a-d t.`.ere a:e -o bor.CS _
c:::sta-.di-g a: t*e ti �e t`e :efe:e-c_� is a:�:ctied, t`at �ere
iss�ed }e:c:e !!af 1, 1988. e:-:�i--_-•'��-:e:eecadn.:.-.r.e:en�_-g .
:.'.�-i:%-C►:LCL�f �L�G�vSO- ��:C'lt�-�t•.G�_r7.G������tlGQ.:���OO�G
-.es•io-r=i�::-_-e:e-tat-�:e--•.�e-d:st:-c:-_�-liedqed:--cc
et-__. '
�c-=ae"t:�-=:-t=9'=ri=�esr iLe au:!:crity rLSt a::;.La�ly cay to
t�e scLool cistrict a:s a-cL^t c� i: cre �en� ecLal :o t!:e
. ir.c:e-e.^.t t�at is attributab2e to t}e ir.crense i� t':e tax
' � capaci.y rate u.^.Cer t.*.e referer.c;:a.
' � , � �"e� (1) c�ces -ct aopl�+. L'po� aP?roval
(� i� claLSe t.}-ei,:-
�by a zajoritf vote ot the qcver�i::q ho�y ot the r.�unicipalitf aad
. t1:e sc!:ool bcard, the autherity r..ust :ay to t}e screol disttict
a� z-c::�t oi i-cr'e:r�er.t eeLal to t}e i�cze-.eat t`at is
attri�Ltable to t?:e ir.crease i� t�e `nz cacacity cate L:Zec t.`.e
refe:e-cu�. ' .
(c T1:e arounts of these ir.cre-ents nay be expended and
r..ust be treated by tFe school district in t!:e sa:r.e �aaner as
prcvi�ed for tte revezLes 2erived irc� the referer.Cc:� le�Y
tppro�ed by t�e voters. T':e pra•�isicns oi ihis subdivision
tco?y :o ?rojects for �hic'� certif?catien was requested beEore,
��, rrd aftec :+;:g::st 1, 19�4.
0
-
i
AGREEMENT
This Agreement is dated as of January 2, 1991, is
by and between the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent
School District No. 13, and provides as follows:
9708
2K
1. Definitions. As used in this Aqreement, the
following terms have the followinq meanings, respectively:
��Citv" means the City of Fridley,
Minnesota.
"HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Fridley,
Minnesota.
"Proiect" means Redevelopment Project
No. 1 established and operated by the HRA
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.001 through 469.047.
"�985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's
$4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of
1985, dated May 1, 1985.
��j,imited Revenue Note" means the HRA's
$5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Capital
Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated
December 20, 1985.
"1985 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985,
dated December 30, 1985.
"1986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment
Refundinq Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of
Auqust 1, 1986.
"1990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$9,485,000 General Obligation Tax Increment
Refundinq Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990.
"Tax Increment Obliaations" means the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note,
the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the
2L
1990 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual
obligations of the HRA or the City which were
entered into prior to the date of this
Agreement and which commit the use of any tax
increments from the TIF Districts for
specified purposes, projects, or parties.
'�Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.174 throuqh 469.179.
"TZF Districtsp means Tax Increment
Financing District Nos. 1 through 10 within
the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains
certification dates and other information on
the TIF Districts.
"School District" means Independent
School District No. 13, the Columbia Heights
School District.
"Subdivision" means Minnesota Statutes
Second 1989 Supplement, Section 469.177,
Subdivision 10, as amended by Laws of
Minnesota 1990, Chapter 604, Article 7,
Section 24 (a copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit 8). �
2. �ecitals.
(a) In certain cases, the Subdivision
either requires or allows by agreement certain
tax increments attributable to school district
referendum tax levies to be paid to school
districts.
(b) TIF District No. 6 is located
entirely within the boundaries of the School
District, and a portion of TIF District Nos. 2
and 4 are located within the boundaries of the
School District.
(c) None of the property within TIF
District Nos. 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, and IO is
located within the boundaries of the School
District.
(d) It is the purpose of this Agreement
to provide for payment of certain tax
increments to the School District pursuant to
9708
2
2M
and in accordance with the provision of the
Subdivision.
(e) Nothing in this Agreement is
intended to violate the covenants and
agreements heretofore made respectinq the
application of tax increments from the TIF
Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment
Obligations.
3. Recresentations of the Citv.
(a) The Tax Increment Obligations were
issued to finance various activities of the
HRA within the Project.
(b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not
general obligations of the City or the HRA.
Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1
through 5 are pledged to the payment of the
1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other
sources of funds pledqed to the payment
thereof. The final scheduled principal
maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February
1, 1999.
(c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a
general obligation of the City or the HRA and
is payable solely from tax increments pledqed
for such purposes from TIF District No. 6.
(d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable
from tax increments derived from TIF District
Nos. 1 through 6, and the final ficheduled
principal maturity of those Bonds was February
1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the
City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying
all then outstanding principal thereof and
interest thereon.
(e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from
tax increments derived from TIF District Nos.
1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal
maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000.
However, the City has advance refunded the
1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990
G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to
said refunding that all of the principal of
9708
3
9708
2N
and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have
been paid on or before February 1, 1994.
(f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from
tax increments derived from TIF District Nos.
1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled
principal maturity of those Bonds is Auqust 1,
2009.
(g) Portions of the principal of the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note,
the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds,
and the 1990 G.O. Bonds were outstanding on
May 1, 1988, and/or are outstandinq on the
date of this Agreement.
4. Representations of the School District.
(a) On October 5, 1981, the electorate
of the School District approved a 5.0 mill
continuous levy first effective for the 1981
payable 1982 property taxes. This levy is
hereinafter referred to as the "1981 Levy".
(b) On September 23, 1986, the
electorate of the School District approved a
7.0 mill continuous levy first effective for
the 1986 payable 1987 property taxes. This
levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1986
Levy•' .
(c) According to the Minnesota
Department of Education, for purposes of the
above-mentioned referendum levies the tax
capacity rate equivalents of 5 mills and 7
mills are .06162496 and .07875910,
respectively.
(d) On November 6, 1990, the electorate of
the School District approved a.08 tax capacity
rate levy authorized for 7 years and first
effective for the 1990 payable 1991 property taxes.
This levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1990
Levy".
5. pa ent of Tax Increments to School District. The
City and the School District hereby aqree that, except as
otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement,
tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA
�
20
as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the
tax increments relatinq to the 1990 payable 1991 property
taxes, as follows:
(a) ��F District No. 6. Since the 1981
Levy was approved before the date of
certification of TIF District No. 6, the
Subdivision does not apply to that Levy with
respect to .this District, and no tax
increments attributable to said Levy from this
District are payable to the School District.
Pursuant to clause b(2) of the Subdivision,
the tax increment from TIF District No. 6
which is attributable to the 1986 Levy and the
1990 Levy shall be' paid to the School
DistriCt.
(b) �ZF District No. 4. Since the 1981
Levy was approved prior to the date of
certification of TIF District No. 4, the
Subdivision does not apply to that Levy with
respect to this District. Pursuant to clause
b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax increment
from TIF District No. 4 which is attributable
to the 1986 Levy and the 1990 Levy shall be
paid to the School District•.
(cj �IF District No. 2. Pursuant to
clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax
increment from TIF District No. 2 which is
attributable to the 1981 Levy, the 1986 Levy,
and the 1990 Levy shall be paid to the School
District.
6. Further Acrreements. Nothing in this Agreement is
intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate
the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in
connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the
extent but only to the extent that the application of the
terms of this Aqreement would give rise to a violation of said
obligations and covenants, including without limitation, the
default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment
Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied
instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to
avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or
obligations. Nothinq in this Agreement shall restrict the
City or the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may
have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts.
9708
5
�
In addition, the City and the School District aqree that
the provisions of paragraph 5 providinq for payment of tax
increment to the School District shall be limited to and shall
apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1990
payable 1991 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion
of said period, the City and the School District agree to
review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good
faith such further agreement or aqreements as may be permitted
by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School
District with respect to discretionary payments of such
applicable tax increment to the School District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have
caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized
representatives.
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
Mayor
City Manager •
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 13
School Board Chair
Superintendent
9708
6
2R
EXHIBIT B
Sec. 2:. �i--esc:a S:at_:es Secc-d :509 5':i='_e-.eat,
sec::ca :'.?,:;7, s_��ivis:c � 10, :s a-.e-�e3 :o :ead:
S��d. :�. (inYv=ti� =0 SCaC�C�L iC� n=.-='-`•:��•`�! ?-'vi j(3 =•`•�
:C'�35:C•:S C� :'�:S SL'�`C:'��S.CZ 2z: � f �O LaX .'C:t'•!''t f:•:2'Cl.:y
C:S:::C:S LGd ri0�lCLS �C: ���C'.! Gl::2�:CLt2C:'f 4aS .l=�lS:td .
�efc:e !!ay 2, 1SE8, t'at a:e lcca:ed ?a a sc`ocl dis:r:c: i�
_;::ci ;.`.e •:c:t:s ra�e a:�rcved �ey tax ca�.aci:y :ates cr a�
i-c:ense f� taz cn:tcity :a:es a:ter t�e :nx i,cze�.er.t :i-a::ci-g
dis:r:c: �as certified_
i5� ei� �� cr.ere are ::o o�:sta,air.q �cr.�s ca r.ay i, 1SE8,
;o -�ic� i-c:t-.er.t f:c� tLe C:s:r=�► =g ?'-ecced, or ti} if t`e
:e_'e:e-��� is ar:rcced af:er !!ay 1,' 1586, a-d tFete a:e r.o bc��'s
cLts:�-Ci-g at tre ti-e :`e zefeze�C�� is ap�:cr•ed, t`at �ere
iss;:ed =e:c:e !?ny 1, 19E8, e:-{5i-i`-=~e-:efeee-d:..: _-c:eesir.g
•.=e-.ax-e` ec:`.7'ea`e-we�-n_�•e<ed-aE�ee-!he--.C.�-:etea='==�ne
__
ee-__'e�-10-r='st�-_-G:t-.t-�-_:e--t'e-G:St-eCy-e�-Y'stGStd:--?i
cc_:ee-{:7-e:-t��-•� :e:T :!:e ae:.`.crity �us: a::^ually eay to
-r==
t`e sctool �is:zict aa a-ouat ef i^crt:�ent e4ua1 to t*e
iacre-.e^t t�a: is attributable to t.*.e iaczease in t?:e tax
caYrci:y zate un�er the referer.��n.
(2Z if claLSe f?i-er�:_e� (1) dces -et apaly, cpo� aoproval
by a.;,ajority vote of t::e yc�er�i-q bcdy of the r.,unicipality a-d
tFe sc�ool bcard, t�e aut.*.ority -:+:st ray to t}e scheol district
aa a-e;:�t of i-cr'e.��er.t teLal to tie ir.c:e:r,e�: t`at is
att:ibutab?e to the ir,crease i� t!:e :ax cagacity rnte L-�er t.`.e
zef�:e-cua. ,
�;he ar..ounts of t2:ese ir.cre:�ents may be expended and �
must be treated by the school district in the same :nanner as
pzcvi2ed for t::e revenLes 2erived frc:n the referer.CL^+ levy
app:c�ed ty the voters. T::e provisions of this subdivision
apply ta projects for vhich ceztification vas requested before,
c�, a-c aftec �LC::st 1, 1974.
e
This Aqreement is
by and between the City
School District No. 14,
9707
2S
AGREEMENT
dated as of January 2, 1991, is
of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent
and provides as follows:
1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the
following terms have the fo�lowinq meanings, respectively:
"Citv" means the City of Fridley,
Minnesota.
" i#�R " means the Housinq and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Fridley,
Minnesota.
"Pro,j ect" means Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1 established and operated by the
HRA pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.001 through 469.047.
"�985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's
$4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of
1985, dated May 1, 1985.
���imited Revenue Note" means the HRA's
$5,603,755.8o Limited Revenue Capital
Appreciation Tax Increment Note, dated
December 20, 1985.
"1985 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General
ObZigation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985,
dated December 30, 1985.
"�986 G.O. Bonds" meaas the City's
$10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment
Refundinq Bonds, Series 2986, dated as of
August 1, 1986.
"1990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$9,485,000 General �Obligation Tax Increment
Refunding Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990.
"Tax Increment Obligations" means the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note,
the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the
1990 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual
obligations of the HRA or the City which were
entered into prior to the date of this
Aqreement and which commit the use of any tax
increments from the TIF Districts for
specified purposes, projects, or parties.
M�ax Increment Act" means Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.174 throuqh 469.179.
„�IF Districts" means Tax Increment
Financinq District Nos. 1 throuqh 10 within
the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains
certification dates and other information on
the TIF Districts.
"�chool District" means Independent
School District No. 14, the Fridley School
District.
"�,ubdivision" means Minnesota Statutes
Second 1989 Supplement, Section 469.177,
Subdivision 10, as amended by Laws of
Minnesota 1990, Chapter 604, Article 7,
Section 24 (a copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit B).
2. Recitals.
(a) In certain cases, the Subdivision
either requires or allows by aqreement certain
tax increments attributable to school district
referendum tax levies to be paid to school
districts.
(b) TIF District Nos. 1 and 8 are
located entirely within the boundaries of the
School District, and a portion of TIF District
Nos. 2 and 4 are located within the boundaries
of the School District.
(c) None of the property within TIF
District Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 is located
within the boundaries of the Schoo2 District.
(d) It is the purpose of this Agreement
to provide for payment of certain tax
increments to the School District pursuant to
9707
2T
9707
and in accordance with the provision of the
Subdivision.
(e) Nothinq in this Agreement is
intended to violate the covenants and
agreements heretofore made respectinq the
application of tax increments from the TIF
Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment
Obligations. .
3. Representations of the Citv.
(a) The Tax Increment Obliqations were
issued to finance various activities of the
HRA within the Project.
(b) The 1985 Revenue Bonds are not
general obliqations of the City or the HRA.
Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1
through 5 are pledged to the payment of the
1985 Revenue Honds, and there are no other
sources of funds pledged to the payment
thereof. The final scheduled principal
maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February
l, 1999.
(c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a
general obligation of the City or the HRA and
is payable solely from tax increments pledged
for such purposes from TIF District No. 6.
(d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable
from tax increments derived from TIF District
Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled
principal maturity of those Bonds was February
1, 2000. However, on February 1, 2990, the
City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying
all then outstandinq principal thereof and
interest thereon.
(e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from
tax increments derived from TIF District Nos.
1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal
maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000.
However, the City has advance refunded the
1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990
G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to
said refunding that all of the principal of
3
2U
2V
and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have
been paid on or before February 1, 1994.
(f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from
tax increments derived from TIF District Nos.
1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled
principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1,
2009.
(g) Portions of the principal of the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note,
the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds,
and the 1990 G.O. Bonds were outstandinq on
May 1, 1988, and/or are outstanding on the
date of this Agreement.
4. Representations of the School District.
(a) On September 23, 1986, the
eZectorate of the School District approved a
2.0 mill continuous levy first effective for
the 1986 payable 1987 property taxes. This
levy is hereinafter referred to as the "1986
Levy".
(b) On September 29, 1987, the
electorate of the School District approved (i)
a 7.0 mill continuous levy first effective for
the 1987 payable 1988 property taxes and (ii)
a continuous additional 6.5 mill levy first
effective for the 1988 payable 1989 property
taxes. These levies are hereinafter
collectively referred to as the "1987 Levies".
(c) According to the Minnesota
Department of Education, for purposes of the
above-mentioned referendum Ievies the tax
capacity rate equivalents of Z mills and 13.5
mills are .02261395 and .15264411,
respectively.
5. Pavment of Tax Increments to School District. The
City and the School District hereby agree that, except as
otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement,
tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA
as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the
tax increments relating to the 1990 payable 1991 property
taxes, as follows:
9707
4
2W
(a) T�F Distri�t No. 8. Since the 1987
Levies were approved after the date of
certification of TIF District No. 8, and since
on May 1, 1988, there were no bonds
outstanding to which increment from TIF
District No. 8 was pledged, the tax increments
from TIF District No. 8 which are attributable
to the 1987 Levies are automatically payable
and shall be paid to the School District
pursuant to clause b(1) °=OVed S��=�tolthe
Since the i986 Levy was app P
date of certification of TIF District No. 8,
the Subdivision does not apply to that Levy
with respect to this District, and no tax
increments attzibutable to said Levy from this
District are payable to the School District.
(b) �IF Distr�rt �to. 4. Pursuant to
clause b(2) of the Subdivision, tAe tax
increment from TIF District No. 4 which is
attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 1987
Levies shall be paid to the School District.
(c) T zF District N9.�• Pursuant to
clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax
increment from TIF District No. 2 which is
attributable to the 1986 Levy and the 1987
Levies shall be paid to the School District.
td) �sF District No. �. Pursuant to
clause b(2) of the Subdivision, the tax
increment from TIF District No and thec 1987
attributable to the 1986 Levy
Levies shall be paid to the School District.
6, Further Aareements. Nothing in this Agreement is
intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate
the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in
connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the
extent but only to the extent that the application af the
terms of this Agreement would give rise to a violation of said
obligatians and covenants, includinq without limitation, the
default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment
Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied
instead in the manner, but only to the extent necessary, to
avoid such default or othe= violation of said covenants or
obligations. Nothinq in this Agreement shall restrict the
City er the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may
have relating to the Project or the TIF Districts.
9T07 5
2X
In addition, the City and the School District aqree that,
except in each case described in paraqraph 5 of this Aqreement
where payment of tax increment to the School District is
mandatory pursuant to clause b(1) of the Subdivision, all
other provisions of said paraqraph 5 providinq for payment of
tax increment to the School District shall be limited to and
shall apply only to such tax increment attributable to the
1990 payable 1991 real estate property taxes, and at the
conclusion of said period, the City and the School District
agree to review the circumstances and to attempt to neqotiate
in good faith such further aqreement or aqreements as may be
permitted by law and which are acceptable to both the City and
School District with respect to discretionary payments of such
applicable tax increment to the School District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have
caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized
representatives.
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
Mayor
City Manager
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 14
School Board Chair
Superintendent
9707
6
EXHZBIT A
Schedule of Tax Increment Financing Districts
Within Housing and Redevelopment
Project No. 1 of the Fridley HRA
TZF District
1
2
3
�
F�
6
7
8
9
10
9707
ame
Center City
Moore Lake
North Area
Johnson Printing/
Skywood Mall
Paschke
Lake Pointe
Winf ield
Shorewood
Onan/Old Central
Northco Phase III
Certif ication
Date
5/11/79
7/31/81
5/19/82
1/20/84
3/15/84
12/24/85
10/22/86
10/24/86
9/7/89
4/10/90
2Y
Independent
School
n; st�ict No.
14
13/14
11/16
13/14
16
13
16
14
16
16
ExHZBiT s
zZ
sec. s<. wi- .a _ .
..-�sc. S:at_:es Secc-a ,epg �.._,� _.
=lC::C� iE3.? i7 L , -r: -!••.E... �
�:=�. ?J, �f s�.,civ?s:c� 10, :s a-.�-�ed :o :eac:
:;,:'�:\: :0 SC-C+C•*, rC� 1::-i=''�' i
::C7�c' � • . � . �:� _i-Z. � (E :~!
. :C'S C� :�SS SL'�C1',r=S�C'7 t^�1 � � �
r- f � ��X . : :�
C.S::1C:5 E'� .,-p.EC: • " G:E-.2' 't�C1'y
.B_°C:2 !!Ey i� 1Ce s�Cr ��:C'� CtZ:_.:�Lt°_G� t•ES ZE.L'EStEd ,
.8, :`at a:e ?cca: d
�asc� ;=e �c:e:s � E � d `-c•`•cc' �=s:::c: :�
L'.e 2t�zc.ed -ev :ax ca�ac:t•
' 1•:CiE�qe a J� �L�ES CI 2:1 - �
C15:::Ci. � S,Cl:`i_tC2tjr :L.ES E.tti t�Q :EX 1::C:Q�EL� ��.:d^C1�9 .
fied.
rs� c�� :: tr.e- � - :
.e are ::o c�:s:e-c:r9 �cacs ca r?ay �, ,eca.
:o _5?c� : • '
'c:e-.e't f:c� tLe dis:r?ct ;s �2ecced, cr f:} i; t::e
refe:e�cLa -5 ��.:cved af.er !! 1
`�.a-�_-� �� ;we � �f ,.��1�FB, a-d tLere a:e -o bc-�s .
c::�_• ; .
t: �e �::e :efe:e-c_:� =s t--:cv "
iss�ed !�e:c:e � �: ed, t�8: :eze
�Y 1. 1988. e.-f3j- -.Le-
!:e-._x-ta: .=!r-:t:e-w��-t-.:ored-_:a _`°'e:e-d�...-_-c:e�_:r.g
�='--�e�-:C-r=:e'-.__ -t. , � ._ �= .;e-..c_�-:[ter_-r=�=�
� ` _� TC7-�: _�.�� e-=_C:C.��:C�C_St?GC.-:O-=�tGC�,7�:--��
. _t_i ,;
-.-:ee; t::e EL't�Cll�y r.,LS� a;;-;;allf F2Y to
tLe : L
. c..oel cis,r_�� 2� �;-cu::t ef i; crt �e::t tcca2 to t!:e
: i'c;e-er.t t�at is attribntable to t}
e i;,crease ;� t::e taz
���tacity rate ca�er the re+erer.c;:�.
� If cle�ae f'}-e=�=:e� (1 �'ces_;,c�fl��. Lpca aao
: bY e r,.ajcrity �•o;e of th ' __rcval
a gcverni-g bocy ci t}:e �L�ici:aIity a-d
� tre sc!:col b
card, t':e avt.*.ority -;;st ray to the sct;eol district
aa z-.c.-t of i-�r�e-er.
t ecLal to t}e sr.cre-,e�t t;.zt :S
Ltt::�'L'C25�2 LO :t:e
ir.crease :� t!:e ;ax ce�acity rate L-�e: L
refe: e-c;.�a, t e
� `''e 2�oLnts of th
, ese ir.cre-ents -ay be exper.�ed and
-ust be treated b �
Y the school distzict in t!:e sa:re ^�arrer as
prcvi�ed for t}:e rever,ces �erived frc� t1:e referer.��� levy'
2ppro�•ed by t,•,e voters. � •
T..e provis=o:,s of this subdivision
2FP�Y to o;o;ects for uhic!�
�ertif:caticn vas ree;;ested before,
c�, er.d after ,;�c�st 1, 19i9.
�
This Agreement is
by and between the Cit
School District No. 16,
9706
2AA
AGREEl4IENT
dated as of January 2, 1991, is
y of Fridley, Minnesota, and Independent
and provides as follows:
1. �efinitions. As used in this Agreement, the
following terms have the followinq meanings, respectively:
nCitv" means the City of Fridley,
Minnesota.
" i#�A" means the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Fridley,
Minnesota.
"Proiect" means Redevelopment Project No.
1 established and operated by the HRA pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001
through 469.047.
"1985 Revenue Bonds" means the HRA's
$4,070,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of
1985, dated May 1, 1985. .
"Limited Revenue Note" means the HRA's
$5,603,755.80 Limited Revenue Cadated
Appreciation Tax Increment Note,
December 20, 1985.
"1985 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$11,550,000 Variable Rate Demand General
Obligation Tax Incremer►t Bonds, Series 1985,
dated December 30, 1985.
"�986 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$10,045,000 General Obligation Tax Increment
Refundinq Bonds, Series 1986, dated as of
Auqust 1, 1986.
"1990 G.O. Bonds" means the City's
$9,485,000 General Obligation Tax Increment
Refundinq Bonds of 1990, dated March 1, 1990.
"Tax Increment Obliaations" means the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note,
the 1985 G.O. Bonds, the 1986 G.O. Bonds, the
. �
. �
1990 G.O. Bonds, and any other contractual
obliqations of the HI2A or the City which were
entered into prior to the date of this
Aqreement and which commit the use of any tax
increments from the TIF Districts for
specified purposes, projects, or parties.
"Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179.
N�F Districtsp means Tax Increment
Financinq District Nos. 1 throuqh 10 within
the Project. The attached Exhibit A contains
certification dates and other information on
the TIF Districts.
"School District" means Independent
School District No. 16, the Spring Lake Park
School District.
"Subdivision" means Minnesota Statutes
Second 1989 Supplement, Section 469.177,
Subdivision 10, as amended by Laws of
Minnesota 1990, Chapter 604, Article 7,
Section 24 (a copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit B).
2. �ecitals.
(a) In certain cases, the Subdivision
either requires or allows by agreement certain
tax increments attributable to school district
referendum tax levies to be paid to school
districts.
(b) TIF District Nos. 5, 7, 9, and 10
are located entirely within the boundaries of
the School District, and a portion of TIF
District No. 3 is located within the
boundaries of the School District.
(c) None of the property within TIF
District Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 is located
within the boundaries of the School District.
(d) Zt is the purpose of this Agreement
to provide for payment of certain tax
increments to the School District pursuant to
9706
2
I
9706
and in accordance with the provision of the
Subdivision.
(e) Nothing in this Aqreement is
intended to violate the covenants and
agreements heretofore made respecting the
application of tax increments .from the TIF
Districts pursuant to the Tax Increment
Obliqations. �
3. Representations of the Citv.
(a) The Tax Increment Obliqations were
issued to finance various activities of the
HR,A within the Project.
(b) The 1985 Revenue Sonds are not
general obligations of the City or the HRA.
Tax increments from TIF District Nos. 1
through 5 are pledged to the payment of the
1985 Revenue Bonds, and there are no other
sources of funds pledged to the payment
thereof. The final scheduled principal
maturity of the 1985 Revenue Bonds is February
1, 1999.
(c) The Limited Revenue Note is not a
general obligation of the City or the HRA and
is payable solely from tax increments pledged
for such purposes from TIF District No. 6.
(d) The 1985 G.O. Bonds were payable
from tax increments derived from TIF District
Nos. 1 through 6, and the final scheduled
principal maturity of those Bonds was February
1, 2000. However, on February 1, 1990, the
City discharged the 1985 G.O. Bonds by paying
all then outstanding principal thereof and
interest thereon.
(e) The 1986 G.O. Bonds are payable from
tax increments derived from TIF District Nos.
1 through 6, and the final scheduled principal
maturity of those Bonds is February 1, 2000.
iiowever, the City has advance refunded the
1986 G.O. Bonds via the issuance of the 1990
G.O. Bonds, and the City expects pursuant to
said refundinq that all of the principal of
3
���
2DD
and interest on the 1986 G.O. Bonds will have
been paid on or before February 1, 1994.
(f) The 1990 G.O. Bonds are payable from
tax increments derived from TIF District Nos.
1, 2, 3, and 6, and the final scheduled
principal maturity of those Bonds is August 1,
2009.
(g) Portions of the principal of the
1985 Revenue Bonds, the Limited Revenue Note,
the 1985 G.O. Bonds, and the 1986 G.O. Bonds,
and the 1990 G.O. Bonds were outstanding on
May 1, 1988, and/or are outstanding on the
date of this Agreement.
4. Representations of the School District.
(a) On October 8, 1981, the electorate
of the School District approved a 5.0 mill
continuous levy first effective for the 1981
payable 1982 property taxes. This levy is
hereinafter referred to as the "1981 Levy".
(b) On February 27, 1986, the electorate
of the School District approved a 6.0 mill
continuous levy first effective for the 1986
payable 1987 property taxes. This levy is
hereinafter referred to as the "1986 Levy".
(c) According to the Minnesota
Department of Education, for purposes of the
above-mentioned referendum levies the tax
capacity rate equivalents of 5 mills and 6
mills are .05226653 and .06271984,
respectively.
5. Payment of Tax Increments to School District. The
City and the School District hereby agree that, except as
otherwise provided pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement,
tax increments shall be paid to the School District by the HRA
as and to the extent received by the HRA, with respect to the
tax increments relating to the 1990 payable 1991 property
taxes, as follows:
(a) TIF District Nos. 9 and 10. Since
TIF District Nos. 9 and 10 were requested for
certification after May 1, 1988, the
Subdivision does not apply to those Districts,
9706
4
2EE
and no tax increments
Levy or the 1986 Levy
payable to the School
attributable to the 1981
from those Districts are
District.
(b) TIF District No. 7. Since the 1981
Levy and the 1986 Levy were approved prior to
the date of certification of TIF District No.
7, the Subdivision does not apply to those
Levies with respect to this District, and no
tax increments attributable to said Levies
from this District are payable to the School
District.
(c) �sF District No. 5. Since the 1981
Levy was approved prior to the date of cert-
ification of TIF District No. 5, the Subdi-
vision does not apply to the 1981 Levy, and no
tax increments attributable to said Levy from
this District are payable to the School
District. Pursuant to clause b(2) of the
Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF
District No. 5 which is attributable to the
1986 Levy shall be paid to the School
District.
(d) �IF District No. 3. Since the 1981
Levy was approved prior to the date of
certification of TIF District No. 3, the
Subdivision does not apply to the 1981 Levy,
and no tax increments attributable to said
Levy from this District are payable to the
School District. Pursuant to clause b(2) of
the Subdivision, the tax increment from TIF
District No. 3 which is attributable to the
1986 Levy shall be paid to the School
District.
6. Further Aareements. Nothinq in this Aqreement is
intended or shall be applied in such a manner as to violate
the obligations and covenants made by the City or the HRA in
connection with the Tax Increment Obligations, and to the
extent but only to the extent that the application of the
terms of this Aqreement would give rise to a violation of said
obligations and covenants, includinq without limitation, the
default in the timely and full payment of the Tax Increment
Obligations, the applicable tax increments shall be applied
instead in the mannez, but only to the extent necessary, to
avoid such default or other violation of said covenants or
9706 5
2FF
obliqations. Nothinq in this Aqreement shall restrict the
City or the HRA in the exercise of the powers which they may
have relatinq to the Project or the TIF Districts.
In addition, the City and the School District aqree that
the provisions of paraqraph 5 providinq for payment of tax
increment to the School District shall be limited to and shall
apply only to such tax increment attributable to the 1990
payable 1991 real estate property taxes, and at the conclusion
of said period, th�e City and the School District agree to
review the circumstances and to attempt to negotiate in good
faith such further aqreement or aqreements as may be permitted
by law and which are acceptable to both the City and School
District with respect to discretionary payments of such
applicable tax increment to the School District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the School District have
caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized
representatives.
9706
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
Mayor
City Manager
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16
School Board Chair
Superintendent
6
EXHIBIT A
Schedule of Tax Increment Financinq Districts
Within Housinq and Redevelopment
Project No. 1 of the Fridley I�tA
TIF District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
9706
ame
Center City
Moore Lake
North Area
Johnson Printinq/
Skywood Mall
Paschke
Lake Pointe
Winf ield
Shorewood
Onan/Old Central
Northco Phase III
Certif ication
Date
5/11/79
7/31/81
5/19/82
1/20/84
3/15/84
12/24/85
10/22/86
10/24/86
9/7/89
4/10/90
2GG
Independent
School
District No.
14
13/14
11/16
13/14
16
13
16
14
16
16
EXHIBIT B
2HH
Sec. 2<. wSr.r.esc:a Stat::es Secc-d ?�09 S��g'_e-•c�t,
sec:_c� <E�.2i7, s���iv?s'_c� 10, :s a-.e��ed ;o :et�:
5���. ?J. (iAY!'.=\i '0 SC:CYL :Ci i:.-_�:�:��.'i L:'vt•) �a :~!
r:C'�.S�C.'.S C� L:1:! SL'�?CIVSSSC7 t=� � f :� tEX ..:C:t.:.l.'.L i:.•L.:CS.'.�
C_S:[:C:S L�d �.SOjlC�S �C= ��:1C� Cl:��+=�Lt=G7 �tS :!�_t5�ld ,
�esc:e !!ay !, 1SE8, t`at a:e 2cca:ed i� a sc`ocl distr'_c= i�
_�:ca ;.`.e �•c:ezs T:ave a:�zc�ed -ev tax ca�zci:y rates cr aa -
fi-arci-q
� i-crenst :� tax ca=ac?ty :a:es af:er t.`.e tax i,cre-.e.^.: '
d:s:rict Las certified.
�b1 (1) i: t}:ere aze. ::o� c::.sta-ci-q Sc-�s c� Hay 1, 14E3, �
;o �5?c:� i-cze:eat f:ca t�e distr?ct is �le�5ed, cr {i} it t!:e
:efa:e-c�� :s ar:rcved af:er !!ay 1,' ?�EH, a-d :.`.ere ars 'o bo-�s ti .
cLts:a-Ci'g at :re ti�e :.`.e :e_°ert-c�z is a�::c�ed, t�at �ere
iss�ed =e:cre !!Lf 1� 19E8, c:-t:�---'`•'�'=e_e:e-ec..: .-e:ee�:'9
•• _� =:Y_es:e_Y_�- __:cred-_:`e:-�=e--.es:-:eee-:-es�:e �
-e :z-et:ee_ _
e:-oe-.d�-`.o-YLSe?�-_.:e:e-.e.:t-_':e.:.-`.�e-d:st::e:--�-�'seeqedr--ir
c=-== 'f=7 -f'9-a�Yi:eaT .':e EL'L�CLity -us, a::-�ally zay to
e -et
t`e ecLool district az a-cu�t ef i-cre �e�: eeLal :o t.*.e
.i^cre-er.t t'at is attributable to t.`.e i^crease in Lte tax
�� capzcity rate un2er the referer.�::�.
e- _'e� tl) Cces -ct LD��i Lpo� approval
� (2Z If tla�se t?;- r�'=
• by a.;.ajority vote o� t1:e ycver�i-q bcdy of tre r,�unicirality a::d
� tte sc}ool bcard, tl:e aut.*.ority -LSt �a f to tie sc?:eol distric:
a� a-eL�t of ir.cre:ner.t eeLal to t*e :r.c:e:r.e�t t::at is
attributab?e to the ir.crease ia t.`.e :ax cacacity rate L��er tte
refere-cu�. .
(c :1:e nr..ounts of these ir.cre-.ents nay be expended and '
r..ust be treated by the school dist:?ct in t.*.e sa�re ^a�r�er as ,
prcvired for tre rever.Les CeriLed fsc:� t!:e referer.ZL� levyj
approved by t1:e voters. T!:e provisiors of t`�is subdivision
tpply to projects for vhic'� certi'_?cation �as requested before.
o�, t-d aftec ;,Lg::st 1, 19%9•
�
r
I
i _
_
.
-- 3
Community Development Department
G DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 28, 1991 � �,
TO: William Burns, City Manager�.
FROM:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Steven Barg, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: First Reading of an Ordinance Amendment
Regulating Composting and Establishing a New
Fee for Yard Waste Transfer Site
BACKGROUND
ComQostinct •
Recently, the rising costs of yard waste disposal and increasing
environmental awareness have helped create a greater interest in
residential composting. Section 113.07 of the Fridley City Code
makes reference to composting as an acceptable practice which is
not subject to the normal restrictions governing solid waste
storage and disposal. However, there are two potential
deficiencies in this code section:
1. Acceptable materials - The existing definition states that
only tree leaves and grass clippings may be composted.
Currently, information from the University of Minnesota and
other sources clearly indicates that additional materials are
suitable for composting.
2. Standards - Presently, there are no specific restrictions
provided in our ordinance instructing how compost areas are
to be constructed and maintained, except that they may not
"create a health hazard or nuisance to adjoining properties".
This lack of clear standards makes it difficult to protect
adjacent properties from the negative effects of improper
composting.
Further research revealed that several Twin Cities suburbs,
including Eden Prairie, Richfield, and Crystal, have adopted
ordinances pertaining to composting during the past year. Although
these ordinances are too new for any assessment of enforceability,
they specify restrictions concerning acceptable materials, setback
requirements, appropriate enclosures, and other areas.
3A
Composting/Yard Waste
February 28, 1991
Page 2
The portion of the attached amendment proposal pertaining to
composting was prepared based on information gathered from these
ordinances and other sources. It has been modified to reflect
stated concerns involving unacceptable materials and limitation of
composting to properties containing four or fewer dwelling units.
The provisions of this ordinance amendment relating to composting
are not intended to discourage residential composting. The intent
is to ensure that compost areas are designed and maintained in an
appropriate manner.
Yard Waste Transfer Site Fee:
The proposed ordinance also amends Section 11 of the City Code
regarding the gate fee at the yard waste transfer site. Beginning
in October of 1990, $3.00 per trip was charged. As a result of
resident complaints, we are proposing to change the fees to $2.00
per car and $3.50 per truck or trailer in order to charge for a
larger volume of yard waste. Cars would be allowed return trips
up to ten bags in one day with a dated receipt. Trucks would not
be allowed any return trips.
We estimate that the proposed fee structure would also generate
about $38,250 in revenues. Expenditures are estimated at
$38,093.19. If our estimates are correct, the gate fees should
retire the costs to operate the yard waste site.
Recommendation
Attached for first reading is the ordinance amendment revising
Chapters 113 (Solid Waste) regulating composting and 11 (General
Provisions and Fees) regulating the yard waste transfer site fee.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached
ordinance amendment for first reading.
SB/dn
M-91-138
_ .
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE RECODIFYING SECTION 113 OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED "SOLID WASTE
� DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING COLLECTION" BY ADDING
' SECTIONS 113.01.03, 113.01.04, AND 113.01.17
AND RENUMBERING CONSECUTIVELY, AND AMENDING
SECTION 113.07, AND AMENDING SECTION 11 OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CODE ENTITLED "GENERAL PROVISIONS
AND FEES" BY AMENDING YARD WASTE TRANSFER SITE
GATE FEE
The Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows:
113.01. DEFINITIONS
3. Compost.
A mixture of decaying orQanic matter in a contained area.
4. Compostinct.
Anv above c�round microbial process that converts vard waste to
_ _ _ . • � ___ _7 iL�����L
� Yard Waste.
Lawn cligpings and leaves.
113.07. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL[COMPOSTING
1. No person shall dispose of solid waste, as defined in Section
113.01.&10, upon any lands in the City of Fridley e�ee�
unless on an approved landfill site
szrr��ru�—�iipprrrEJ �..•• ...}•.. ���,.' t,'""=.---tv—�,�
z�.- i�—pargoaa—vT—TE�y"�a.'-'�rr'"rEJ 9ia�3iii�� msrizrraiTZrB—� "�'
.�i�3'�'�' mL.' L. i.i L w�1:..L.w• .��L L� ��..L�
1V 4r V
L` �LL. 1" '� esr ��e■� �effec,C Cv Q�TV=Ii1TI�c�vivMC+aa� ,f except
the terms of Section 113.06.2.
2. Composting is permitted on residential groperties containinct
up to four dwelling units provided that all of the followinQ
conditions are met:
A. A compost area may consist onlv of vard waste. fruit or
vegetable waste, eqg shells or coffee arounds ctenerated
meat bones arease whole ecrcts dairv products, and
human or pet feces.
3C
Ordinance No.
Page 2
B. A compost area must be fully confined within a fenced
area or enclosed structure.
C.
line.
D. A compost area may not exceed 250 square feet or four (4)
feet in height.
E. A compost area must not be established or maintained in
a manner such that it creates a nuisance to adiacent
proberties.
11.10. FEES
CODE SUBJECT
FEE
113 Yard Waste Transfer Site .
Gate Fee 52.00 ver car
$3.50 per truck or
trailer
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1991.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
C�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COlrII�I88ION MEETING, F$BRIIARY 20, 1991
r.�.w. w. w1.rwrw.ww ww w►�rw w..�.w.�.�rww w. w.�.�..�.wr�.wwww�.w..rwr�.wrrwww.ww.rw�.w.wrw.wn�w.1rw.�w.w.arww. w.1rr w
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Betzold called the February 20, 1991, Planning
Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Don Betzold, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba,
Sue Sherek, Connie Modig, Brad Sielaff,
Larry Kuechle (for Diane Savage)
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Mary Nelson, 600 Buffalo Street N.E.
Steve Weisenberger, ABRA
Jim Benson, Chase Company
Charles Seykora, Barna, Guzy & Steffen Law Firm
APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 6, 1991, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the
February 6, 1991, Planning Commission minutes as written.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIBLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP
#91-02. BY VANCE AND MARY NELSON:
Per Section 205.24.04.(D) of the Fridley City Code, to allow
the construction of a garage and additional living area in
the CRP-2 (Flood Fringe) District, on Lots 18-21, Block Y,
River-view Heights, the same being 600 Buffalo Street N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CSAIRPERSON BETZOLD
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND TH8 PIIBLZC HEARING OPEN AT
7:31 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated that the special use permit is to allow
the construction of an attached garage and additional living
4.1
pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. FBBRIIARY 20. 1991 PAGE 2
area in the CRP-2, Flood Fringe, District. The property is
located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Buffalo
Street and Broad Street in the Riverview Heights area. The
property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are the
parcels surrounding it.
Ms. McPherson stated that currently located on the lot is a
single family dwelling unit and a detached two-car garage
located in the south portion of the lot. The existing garage
will be removed once the addition is completed. The proposed
addition will include three bedrooms, a bath, and an open play
area on the second floor which will be over the garage,
storage, and laundry and shop areas.
Ms. McPherson stated the Department of Natural Resources
reviewed the proposed floor plan. The living area will be
above the 100 year flood elevation of 823 feet. However, the
storage and garage and shop area will be below the flood
elevation. This is permitted by code and also by the
Department of Natural Resources.
Ms. McPherson stated the Department of Natural Resources
expressed concern regarding the shop area, that the
petitioners and flood insurance company could incur a larger
loss if expensive materials are stored in the shop area.
Ms. McPherson stated the shop area is also large enough so
that it could be converted to habitable living space. As the
floor elevation would be below the 100 year flood elevation,
that would be in violation of code. Staff has proposed that
the addition could be constructed such that this portion of
the house could be constructed on stilts; thereby eliminating
the need for the enclosed shop area. However, if the
petitioners prefer to have the shop area as proposed, staff
is recommending a stipulation on the special use permit such
that they should agree to sign an agreement prohibiting this
area from being converted to living area and to hold the City
harmless should any expensive equipment be lost in a future
flood.
Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning
Commission recommend to �the City Council approval of the
special use permit with the following stipulations:
1. The addition shall be floodproofed in accordance
with the requirements of the building code.
2. An elevation certificate shall be completed and
submitted to the City verifying that the second
floor is above the 100 year flood elevation.
�i �
�LANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 20. 1991 PAGE 3
3. The petitioner shall sign and record against the
property an agreement which holds the City harmless
for any equipment lost from the shop area and, in
addition, agrees that the shop area shall not be
converted to habitable living area.
4. The driveway shall be paved by November 1, 1991.
Ms. McPherson stated that in speaking with the petitioners,
they currently have a hard surface asphalt driveway, and the
petitioners have indicated that the asphalt driveway will be
converted to a concrete driveway once the addition is
completed. Stipulation #4 is unnecessary.
Mr. Betzold stated that regarding stipulation #3, he thought
it might be better to split that into two stipulations as it
is talking about two different agreements. The other concern
he had is about the hold harmless agreement relating to the
equipment. In past instances when they have had requests to
build in the flood plain area, the Commission has stipulated
hold harmless agreements for the whole building, so that the
City can't be held liable because a person(s) was allowed to
build in the flood plain area. Can they expand that
stipulation beyond the equipment to any damage done to the
property?
Ms. Dacy stated she believed that in some other instances,
that stipulation was placed on brand new construction. If
the Commission wants to stipulate that the hold harmless
agreement would pertain to the entire existing house and to
the property, that could probably be done. Staff's attention
was focused on the shop area.
Mr. Kondrick asked if any of the neighbors have voiced any
opposition to this special use permit request.
Ms. McPherson stated staff has not received any calls.
Ms. Mary Nelson, 600 Buffalo Street, stated that when they
first started this project, they realized that there were
codes pertaining to the flood zone, so they hired a designer
to work with the City to design an addition that would meet
the codes as best as possible.
Ms. Nelson stated they have an area on the deck designated
for a future screened-in porch. They have no intention of
using the shop area for anything but a work area. They would
be more than happy to sign an agreement to waive the City of
any liability.
Ms. Nelson stated the reason for their proposal is because
her children, who usually spend summers with her, decided at
4.3
PLANNIN(3 COMMISSION MEETIN(3. FEBRIIARY 20, 1991 PAGE 4
Christmas to come and live with her permanently. They decided
they did not want to change school districts, and they also
want to stay because this is such a beautiful area.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to close the
public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN(i !lY$, CHAIRPERBON BETZOLD
DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED AND T8E PIIBLIC HEARIN(i CLOSED AT
7:45 P.M.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend
to City Council approval of special use permit, SP #91-02, by
Vance and Mary Nelson, per Section 205.24.04.(D) of the
Fridley City Code, to allow the construction of a garage and
additional living area in the CRP-2 (Flood Fringe) District,
on Lots 18-21, Block Y, Riverview Heiqhts, the same being 600
Buffalo Street N.E., with the following stipulations:
1. The addition shall be floodproofed in accordance
with the requirements of the building code.
2. An elevation certificate shall be completed and
submitted to the City•verifying that the second
floor is above the 100 year flood elevation.
3. The petitioner shall sign and record against the
property an agreement which holds the City harmless
for any equipment lost from the shop area or the
shop area itself.
4. The petitioner shall sign and record against the
property an agreement that the shop area and garage
area shall not be converted to habitable living
area.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON BETZOLD
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on
March 4, 1991.
2. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT�__SP
#91-03 BY STEVE WEISENBERGER FOR ABRA:
Per Section 205.15.O1.C. (8) of the Fridley City Code, to allow
exterior storage of materials and equipment on Lot 4, Block
2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, generally located at
771Q University Avenue N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public
hearing. �
r
4.4
pLANNINa COMMI88ION MEETING. FEHRIIARY 20. 1991 PA�3S 5
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPSR80N BLTZOLD
DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC BEARINa OPEN AT
?:45 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated ABRA Auto Body Refinishers of America is
requesting a special use permit to change stipulation #1 from
their original special use permit to allow a repair garage,
which was issued on July 6, 1987, which prohibited the outside
storage of damaged vehicles, parts, and equipment.
Ms. McPherson stated the property is zoned C-3, General
Shopping Center. There is additional C-3 zoning to the north
and south, with M-2, Heavy Industrial, zoning to the west.
The City of Spring Lake Park is located across University
Avenue to the east.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is proposing to expand
and then enclose the parking area to store damaged vehicles,
parts, and equipment. The City Code does allow outside
storage of materials and equipment in this district with a
special use permit, and the City recently issued an outdoor
storage special use permit to Northtown Nissan which is
directly north of the parcel. The Northtown Nissan storage
area is fenced but it does not have slatting or screening.
The proposed storage area by ABRA would be paved and have some
type of screening fence.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner did agree in 1987 that
there would not be any outdoor storage; however, the
petitioner has been storing damaged vehicles in the parking
area over the last six months. In addition to storing the
vehicles outside, the petitioner has failed to complete
stipulation #9 from the original special use permit, which
required that the dumpster be stored inside or be enclosed in
a masonry structure compatible with the existing structure.
Ms. McPherson stated that since the City has issued special
use permits for outdoor storage in this area, staff recommends
that the Planning Commission recommend to City Council
approval of the special use permit request with the following
stipulations:
1. The parking area shall be expanded and paved with
curbing.
2. A six foot high screening fence shall be constructed
to enclose the storage area.
3. Stipulation #9 from SP #87-11 to enclose the
dumpster shall be completed.
4.5
pLANNING COlYIIrII88ION MEETING. F$BRIIARY Z0. 1991 PAQ$ 6
4. A performance bond in the amount af 3$ of the
construction costs of the outdoor improvements shall
be issued to the City.
Mr. Jim Benson, Chase Company, stated he is the original
developer of the property and is representing ABRA. Steve
Weisenberger of ABRA is also at the meeting. He stated the
petitioner agrees with the staff report, and they are at the
meeting to answer questions.
Mr. Kondrick asked how the City can be assured that ABRA will
comply with the special use permit and the stipulations.
Ms. Dacy stated that is part of the purpose for the
performance bond. The other vehicle is that if ABRA does not
meet these stipulations, then the Council always has the right
to hold a revocation hearing and revoke the special use
permit. She stated staff could also inspect the site in July
or August to determine whether or not ABRA is in compliance
with the stipulations.
Mr. Benson stated that ABRA is 5 1/2 years old. They started
in Fridley at the University Avenue Business Center. They now
have 14 locations throughout the metropolitan area. Their
first building was the first prototype building. In 1987,
ABRA was sure they could do everything inside the prototype
building and meet all the stipulations. As the business grew,
the first prototype building became inadequate so they built
bigger buildings on a bigger piece of land. Fortunately, this
piece of land is bigger than they originally needed, so the
additional land is now available. In order to stay in
compliance with the original stipulation, which is not to have
an unsightly facility, ABRA is requesting this special use
permit for exterior storage.
Ms. Modig asked why ABRA has not been in compliance regarding
the dumpster.
Mr. Benson stated the dumpster was originally inside the
building. They found that did not work well and that the
dumpster was not an appropriate dumpster because it was on
rollers. They also needed to go to a larger dumpster, and
bigger dumpsters do not come on rollers and are very difficult
to get in and out of a building. He was not sure at what
point the dumpster was put outside the building, but this
special use permit request is also to satisfy the stipulation
of the original special use permit and put the dumpster into
a concrete structure.
Mr. Sielaff stated it appears that the Code Enforcement
Officer, Steve Barg, talked to ABRA twice and conducted a
4.6
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINC�3 FBBRIIARY 20 1991 AGE 7
number of reinspections. Why was that necessary to get
compliance?
Mr. Benson stated he believed at the time the City raised the
issue, ABRA started looking at alternatives. That process
took a little longer than the City would have liked, and he
apologized for that. But, ABRA is here to comply with all
stipulations, and they want to be a good neighbor in the City
of Fridley.
Mr. Kondrick stated that the performance bond in the amount
of 3� does not amount to much, and it does not provide much
incentive for compliance.
Mr. Saba stated that in 1987 when ABRA came before the
Commission for a special use permit, they told the Commission
that the type of repair work done would be light body work and
basically painting. Now they are doing heavy body work. He
is concerned that there will be severely damaged vehicles
packed into that storage area which will be visible from the
University Avenue.
Mr. Benson stated the fence will be completely opaque and 6
feet high, so the vehicles will not be visible. There are
certain times of the year when there is more of an overflow
of damaged vehicles than other times of the year. He believed
Steve Weisenberger, Manager of ABRA, understands very well
that if he continues to violats the special use permit that
he is jeopardizing that special use permit. ABRA is a good
company. He works with them every day, and they have no
intention to get the special use permit passed and then go on
as before. They have an attractive facility, and they want
to keep it that way.
Mr. Sielaff asked if the proposed storage area is large enough
to accommodate ABRA's needs.
Mr. Weisenberger stated he believed this area would be
adequate. The outdoor storage area will be just for cars they
cannot get inside the building. Right now is their busiest
season, and they have about 10-15 cars outside. Those are
cars that are in process and are not there for long periods
of time. During the summer, they can usually get all the cars
inside the building.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to close the
public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYB, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARINa CLOSED AT
8:05 P.M.
4.7
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 20, 1991 PAGE 8
Mr. Kondrick stated that if the petitioner complies with the
special use permit and the stipulations, that is fine; but
ABRA should be put on notice that if they do not comply this
time, the City will be monitoring them closely.
Mr. Kuechle stated he did not believe a performance bond in
the amount of 3� is adequate. He would be in favor of raising
the performance bond to 10$.
Ms. Sherek agreed. Zt should either be a higher percentage
or a flat minimum.
Mr. Saba and Mr. Rondrick also agreed.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recammend to
City Council approval of special use permit, SP #91-03, by
ABRA Auto Body Refinishers of America, with the following
stipulations:
1.
2.
3.
The parking area shall be expanded and paved with
curbing.
A six foot high screening fence shall be constructed
to enclose the storage area.
Stipulation #9 from SP #87-11 to enclose the
dumpster shall be completed.
4. A performance bond in the amount of 10� of the
construction costs of the outdoor improvements shall
be issued to the City.
Mr. Kondrick stated that it is the opinion of the Planning
Commission that they will be very angry if ABRA does not
comply, and they want ABRA to understand that they must meet
these stipulations or else.
Mr. Sielaff stated he is bothered by the past noncompliance,
but with the increased performance bond plus more frequent
inspections by the City, he could vote in favor of the special
use permit request.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPLRBON BETZOLD
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Mr. Betzold stated this item will also to go the City Council
on March 4, 1991.
I �
pLANNINa COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 20, 1991 PAa� 9
3. �ONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT L S. #91-01 BY CHARLES SEYKORA:
To split off that part of Lot 6, Block 5, Pearson's Craigway
Estates 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies
southeasterly of a line 3.5 feet northwesterly of and parallel
with the southeast line of said Lot 6, and combine it with Lot
7, generally located at 7836 and 7830 Alden Way N.E.
Ms. McPherson stated.the petitioner is proposing to split 3.5
feet of Lot 6 to combine it with Lot 7, Block 5, Pearson's
Craigway Estates 2nd Addition, the same being 7836 and 783Q
Alden Way. Both properties are zoned R-1, Single Family
Dwelling, and abut the Mississippi River bluff line and
overlook Riverview Heights Park and the Mississippi River to
the west.
Ms. McPherson stated the proposed lot split is to correct an
encroachment of a sidewalk from Lot 7 onto Lot 6. The 3.5
feet will not adversely impact either lot regarding lot width
or lot area.
Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning
Commission recommend to City Council approval of the lot split
with one stipulation:
1. The portion to be split shall be coYabined with Lot
7 and expressed on one tax statement.
Mr. Charles Seykora stated he does not own either property.
He is an attorney retained by Universal Title Insurance
Company, because Mr. John Meador's sidewalk encroached onto
the property next door. He is representing Mr. Meador (7830
Alden Wayj to try to correct his encroachment problem. Staff
has made a very good analysis of what is involved.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Saba, to recommend to
City Council approval of lot split, L.S. #91-01, by Charles
Seykora, to split off that part of Lot 6, Block 5, Pearson's
Craigway Estates 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, which
lies southeasterly of a line 3.5 feet northwesterly of and
parallel with the southeast line of said Lot 6, and combine
it with Lot 7, generally located at 7836 and 7830 Alden Way
N.E., with one stipulation:
1. The portion to be split shall be combined with Lot
7 and expressed on one tax statement.
OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPEItBON BETZOLD
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY.
Mr. Betzold stated this item will go to City Council on March
4, 1991.
4.9
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 20, �991 PAGE 10
4. RECEIVE JANUARY 1Q 1991 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to receive
the January 10, 1991, Housing & Redevelopment Authority
minutes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTINt3 AYL, CHAIRP8R80N BETZOLD
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
5. RECEIVE JANUARY 15 1991 ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY AND ENERGY
COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the
January 15, 1991, Environmental Quality and Energy Commission
minutes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD
DECLP,RED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
6. RECEIVE FEBRUARY 5 1991 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive
the February 5, 1991, Appeals Commission minutes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTIN(i lIYS, CHAIRPER80N BETZOLD
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Ms. Modig, to adjourn the
meeting. Upon a voice vote, Chairperson Betzold declared the
February 20, 1991, Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 8:15
p.m.
Respectfully sub tted,
yn Saba
Recording Secretary
r �
�
I
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
�
Community Development Department
PLASJIVING DIVISION
City of Fridley
February 27, 1991
William Burns Cit Manager ���
. Y �
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Special Use Permit, SP #91-02, by Vance and
Mary Nelson
Attached is the above-referenced staff report. The Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request
to the City Council with the following amended stipulations:
1. The addition shall be flood-proofed in accordance with the
requirements of the building code.
2. An elevation certificate shall be completed and submitted to
the City verifying that the second floor is above the 100 year
flood elevation.
3. The petitioner shall sign and record against the property an
agreement which holds the City harmless for any equipment or
materials lost from the addition.
4. The petitioner shall sign and record against the property an
agreement which states that the shop area shall not be
converted to habitable living area.
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
MM/dn
M-91-139
1
�
� �
, �
STAFF
APPEALS DATE
REPORT
4.11
I�i��F PLAI�VING COMNINSSION DATE : February 20, 1991
�I ��DL� (;� (`,Q��1j(�L �A'j� : March 4, 1991 q�Hpq MMldn
'�REQUEST
i PERMIT NUMBER
� APPLICANT
� PROPOSED REQUEST
' LOCATION
i
SITE DATA
S{ZE
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
8� ZONWG
UTLJT�S
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FINANClAL IMPUCATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
COMPATIBiUTY WITH
ADJACENT USES & ZONING
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
'�
�
SP 4t91-02
Vance/Mary Nelson
_ - 1
s �iz s �c. �
clrr of
�
t1� ET , �,;s l , � � i
,,�r•" � 1 r. 1 \�.
` „-""�'" :,�, , ..: . , -1 \
1 r�"' 1► �E{�t '�r„�• �i . � " , \ -:r
' �*•'�' ''�.✓ = w- i�i�':'� r S ,��.. .�.r .°�,. — f� .
� �.• _
�,�•��Ah'��'��lY•� V'���,.�v�.r+���.+ � I ,i�� ��;, � +�. � J� 3� W .F�lr1�t�l
• i: � . A ` �i it r r « .... � � 'ty . y. } y+ �
w' f�►�M� y�": �'C� . � .,�',;.! �, .. �.��� '� s�: _Y a =, �I t �,..,-
L� _� � 4 .4'� �v ',�! .. . - .�• • �
,r�v�'r � :r EEt f:. . � ,ir'�' .-���'r
� �;� r ~•'.:� 4 O.. ' r..� '��' .y , � . ' J ►: ip . � ELY
�'�' . � � ..y.• � : n:r' a' ' .. , .
T � � . • �• � �.�1 .�, .li � ♦ . �{.t• � � ,1+ •y'�' '.�' ! 1 '• jt ��j., 'r �r w 1
r'' •.r�.,,1' „ » . .1 , l . � I V) � ,'��� , ..r ...�" w
�..4�� � ����..�y:r '� • ^� . ' . � �. 1 � ' :. �p_�-'�=g I ' f.
.� Np ' 4����:`�+,•'�/. 1 �;.�� �' ' •��'+ r' F... _.. .
�` ' � r'.,',�.�v'S � �.. . � . � ,.'.��
� t. � ' �� ( ' • •. • . ► •t »
�- �.p.�'^'yy a���i.. �.'� r ���. : ,r', � �r. . ..'� ��.. '.� ..t r � �. . �i �
yC. � �, �1 � - �� ` � � h �` y� �A' I ! � . � ,Y �. t¢`� t� � ` �.t• �� . ..
p,� w X �.� �• •i �`„4 A� r� 14.:5� . ' ' ' .
� , ,I, �r .. � lllERT/ ' i'
� .r + 1� ..�Y � � � ' .�, �' i 'Y \��' ,� __Q� J�
,`.; t �' ir•.vr
�.-3,, �, ..., , .^ � � ; :��,r'�_, .•. ��� .w.:.;,. .�,..�.
;`�-.r � • � «� ��, , { • , . � �► . . � .,, . , - , � �S-.5�:�' _ •
� ,, � t.. t `�' .F � ,�� ��w kr w. 1' ..I i •��` \��", ' n ,
,. __'.1%M r�,�x;rsa�,T G �t�, � ��r 1rR '��p' � i 'i � �� 't X � w
� � �I?`'�c � �" 'v'�`'l t'w • .� .\
R / ,, � "X T ' LONGFELIOw �\'
�� �-:31y�..,,�- .�*'� S�fR .,;r `.� �.sM � ,i+ .M�..r.�'` �`.
. ��„�{It , _t �t.•,� '� �D :'!� • �'i': � .,.N�.�wi 4+v.� �: . �� �
� •� ' ` `'� �. ..��F C.. '��� � �Z � g � W '� r \ ,
'1' j. .�`A-r`'� . . � . , :•, ` �
/ -`.� '- - F��F� .k��• *�•�� a4l iJ !J • �w 'r�i•M:,��'',�.�►',,,. .,\�. �\
.• �.' ,'��'F.� ,,_ ... ,i•I :�. �; • W \ �
,,,,�.,' . • �=-•��I �i,�� �' ��',i�L -�'i z
� ���••• ?• '
r�" +Y '
. /�� � �. - 'Y.1 � I .• .; � :..... �.Ii'..Ii�. � ' "
V, ±c�,, �. c' � .4y.�, `�_ ,;"`•
� \ � ; ti. I (I� � Y'.'YJ�M � ' /� �M '� �j �,+� �� � �.
s �. � o o �
`\ '�� •4� , . _ � �. • �
' A . ( 1 ry �0 ,. �' o �C � l
�.� ' � %,�i' � y Q )'ri ��,, '
\ • N � � �� � �•� . .
� � 5y�r -.�. � G � /,. .
33 -O � Ep►R ,, .�� P� K ''',R' ��P.
� . P '.d �� h , ` _ �, ., .
� k,. .' i ,' 'V
.a� i��1►► a• � � �� a n. •%,:.? �.
� � \ ` �F_ • _ ••I �'�i ,�p 4�, •.M• '.
�j/ ~ �� r ,' p��, �•✓�' 99`Tp ��i
- �/ ,,, '' .•"��, s� µ.,� y „�
. �. a, ,�
2�� � . � � •._ � �'` : � :•;, �; r
-..n t . � : A,. -�� ... +y
�2 '\� z- �:` � i.�� lo�� ,1 -s� � . .
� -- '� �:, __' ; ���0� ,�, � ' �'� ��pl
c� L �'' '�'. '` ' '�� P� b
.� ,
�G � O.• � 7,�n � rr` .
2�• � v, �•:�rr
� , � ••\� _�_ "� , _ ��
_ �, ,� - , ..�_�j, S�
,
O �
L4CATION MAP
2
�
,
1
�
1
.1
,
�
` SP 4�91-02
VancejMary Nelson
- ,/
i - . ��J����
�
� ���
,�, � ..•
I�
► ��,•'*'
''�� =
� '
� � �
` ,.��...,. . � • . ; �
,�� , i � `�• i:
� � .■�. 1
� �,��1• f ■o�
c � �i+�
• �� .0
�����
r '�,���
�� 4d �fG
1��'� �
' �� �i
y .��'
Ii • • . �
�
.,��� :
E
O �
�
•i
' ' -��il
� .A
�%7�� .s.�'7_7337
!�
� !
+� b
.
� � �.
�. �r
�, .
,�,
/�.'� �J
�
.•►�� � _/
'�
�'
a�''` �' �
� :� � �
3 - Q �4 1
�� �
:� � � ,.
� �� �,
'� � f
.� ��
� `� c„�
.\, �' � -
� �
� '
�
/ � 1
f�
0
�� /
R11'�
( � �+'
i
t4 ►-
�
:�r
>� ��
P
BERTY
6
( ` � . � � � z .�, ..,�
�, y ....., ,., ,.,.,
, ��
' � , , , •, .
\ `• .►�. `� �
�, \ � � �` �' � • i • �� --i �
� ` � � 1 � ♦ d� • •
R i v E R Vi�� W '� �' - ��Cfl � • � • . �
a �f� ,, , • . •� . •
HE�GMt� � � ti •� • ' '
..
�i, LJ �', • '� `,S' ���,,`•�.'
\ •• � � � ,� � � � ' r , ,
\\ � • + �� + �^� � •� , �
` � � � + e + � ,� • � � ''P,�
\� \ . s • � ti �1 1� • .
�` f�;efy '` t •,� ' � pt� • •
�. '. � W � \ • 0 1� .� , 1 ' �� PQ� � • �
. � � .
f 1 � y
C'_a l'.� • � ' S
ZONING MAP
3
4.14
Staff Report
SP #91-02, Vance and Mary Nelson
Page 2
Rec�uest
The petitioners are requesting that a special use permit be granted
to allow construction of �an attached garage and an additional
living area in the CRP-2 �(Flood Fringe) district. The request is
for Lots 18, 19, 20 and 21, Block Y, Riverview Heights. In
addition to the special use permit, the petitioners have applied
for a front yard setback variance from 35 feet to 14.5 feet and 21
feet. The Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance
request to the City Council at their February 5, 1991 meeting.
Site
Located on the parcel is a single family dwelling unit with a
detached two car garage. The petitioners are proposing to
construct an addition which will be two stories. Garage and
storage areas will be located on the lower level and bedrooms,
bath, and living area on the upper level. The property is zoned
R-1, Single Family Dwelling as are the parcels to the north, south,
east, and west.
Analysis
The proposed addition is designed such that the living area will
be above the 100 year flood elevation of 823. The first floor area
is to be used for garage, storage, laundry and shop areas. Staff
sent the proposed plans to the Department of Natural Resources for
review. Tom Hovey, area representative for the DNR, expressed
concern that the shop area would be used to house expensive tools
and equipment which could be lost if the property should experience
a 100 year flood. An agreement holding the City harmless is this
occurs should be signed and recorded against the property. It is
possible that the addition could be constructed without the shop
area such that the upper story could be built on stilts. The shop
and garage areas will need to be flood proofed in accordance with
the requirements of the building code.
In addition, the shop area is large enough that it could be
converted to additional living area (three or four season porch).
If this occurred, the floor elevation would be below the 100 year
flood elevation, and in violation of code. If the petitioners do
not want to eliminate the shop area, an agreement should be signed
and recorded against the property so that this area cannot be
converted to habitable living space by either the Nelson's or
future owners.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval
4.15
Staff Report
SP #91-02, Vance and Mary Nelson
Page 3
to the City Council of the special use permit request, SP #91-02,
to allow the construction of a garage and additional living area
in the CRP-2 district, with the following stipulations:
1. The addition shall be flood proofed in accordance with the
requirements of the building code.
2. An elevation certificate shall be completed and submitted to
the City verifying that the second floor is above the 100 year
flood elevation.
3. The petitioner shall sign and record against the property an
agreement which holds the City harmless for any equipment lost
from the shop area and in addition agrees that the shop area
shall not be converted to habitable living area.
Planning Commission Action
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the request to the City Council. The Commission also voted to
divide stipulation #3 into two separate stipulations as follows:
3. The petitioner shall sign and record against the property an
agreement which holds the City harmless for any equipment or
materials lost from the addition.
4. The petitioner shall sign and record against the property an
agreement which states that the shop area not be converted to
habitable living area.
City Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
o�
V�
-
C7 =
aLL
W
z�
z-
=
�
Wg
�°
z�
rr h
►��
�
LL� Y
N �
U-_
Q �.
O
W
z
U
�
%
a
0
`p�/1pildw 1Nn}
1? i
�� ��
,1._ . -
n, r-
•• , !
� �
� ._
o �
' :l7 ;
� � �� �.�.' { "
� � :
' � �� Z�
' iL.� i y 1
�� w
! �w ��� o �
� fi t .��� .�., ; <
a+n°-0°n�",o � .�%
7MIV�1! A�101�'1
/
�-.�.�
� 1�� � '
0
s� = -
�a��� $ :
� ; �
�i��� �
x �
� ��� 3i s
E � „ .�
� t���s g �
� ���'� � �
� t��a� � €�
� ! � Y � � � � i
� ° �°
� � 'w
=
O � f y n
S �Y '� P � � F�
� ; t����� � $o
w �� r ; :
� � � f €i�� � �9
^ = � �$��'� Y �i
r } � �•� �� ��
� � � ������ �� `�,
^ � O� ii C���y n= �.g
� � � H �' : � �i: �� �3
SP 4�91-02
�_ �
� � •
. �
.. � � -� t
.. ��
.
•� /
.�v�
�
u
u.
0
N
�
°
U
Z
�
0
W
�
�
�
�
_
m
�
i
E X I ST 1 N G SiT t r�H�
�
�
,
0
r
4
W
...
�. � t� .
i-�
". w �� POC
, � .
�n�
�oE� .
� � � �:�
! I Sl ♦�
O-�C
• _
� ON11Y1M0
�,vys �aoi�-�
er
f1ti��
M
�� � �}� � �
.�+ ..... ••-
�
_ _-_-_
�
-� ;�
� �
SP 4�91-02
Vance/Mary Nelson
�
a
� '�
. �
� �
��
�.
� - -- —�
. .1 �
� 1 ;�
^ � 9 � 7 7
�� �L��'�e = e
�' ���i�� � =
_ � �
,�. 3 �• .a 2
a� �� � c �
{i � � w
.i
w � � � � � St .�
r;
z� � t���� � �
.• = !�°�! s � E
C7� � ��e�� ; •
z '
� � a3 ��� � €�
W� � q
d a���it � ��
� = ��
� l� � � 7 u n
H
�� � 2 �Y��� 9 �'�
y� z W ���j�� � E�
�
,� U � � °� ������ y ��
� a � ��i�eEJ �
� � i j �' �
�� � � � � ����'� �� �k�f
W ^ ^ m '�� � 6� C L�
Us $ � �,�i °� ?g
� � -� =9
� �js=��� '�� ��
. A� > > '� ��:i�i� �� ��
_-----�
'',
�
w)
w
�
Q
_
W
x
U
Z
w
O
�
..
,�;; y
�v'
��
4'
��
�
z
m
0
-,
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
•I�
SP ��91-02
Vance/Mary Nelson
C� SEC'��t� FInoR �U.►J .
'— � t I� • -�o"
7J
F�
�
--�--
I
��
i� i
FLOOR PLAN
�
0
0
7
0
. �
j�l
�
�
z
�
. �
0
SP #91-02
Vance/Mary Nelson
/
/� � r/ .
��
4.
r
��
�
SECTION
4.2 2
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearing of the
Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431
University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, February 20, 1991 at 7:30 p.m.
for the purpose of:
Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #91-
02, by Vance and Mary Nelson, per Section
205.24.04.(D) of the Fridley City Code, to
allow the construction of a garage and
additional living area in the CRP-2 (Flood
Fringe) District, on Lots 18-21, Block Y,
Riverview Heights, the same being 600 Buffalo
Street N.E.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an
opportunity at the above stated time and place.
DONALD BETZOLD
CHAIRMAN
PLANNING COMMISSION
Publish: February 6, 1991
February 13, 1991
Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley
Community Development Department, 571-3450.
SP 4i90-02
Vance & Mary Nelson
Garland Lagesse
7951 Broad Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
James Bowe/Resident
7919 Broad Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
James Bowe
2546 - 3rd Street N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Stephen Sundquist
630 Cheryl Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Clark Nason
614 Cheryl Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Gordon Hedlund
1255 Pike Lake Drive
New Brighton, MN 55112
Frank Shimek
7901 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Bruce Thompson
6212 Hillside Road
Edina, MN 55436
Bruce Thompson/Resident
630 Buffalo Street N.
Fridley, MN 55432�
Margaret Iverson
7899 Broad Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Barbara Bollig
58] Buffalo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Anthony Turek
611 Buffalo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
MAILING LIST
James Brady
641 Buffalo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Planning 2/1/91
Council
Joel �Marquardt
7921 Riverview Terrace N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Earl Gemmill
468 Longfellow Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Kevin Holman
571 - 79th Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Bergsagel and Rogness
16515 - 6th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55447
Walter Rasmussen
541 - 79th Way N.E.
Fridley, NIN 55432
Earl Gemmill/Resident
555 - 79th Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Robert Kohls
640 Cheryl Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Vance Nelson
600 Buffalo Street N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
City Council Members
Planning Comm. Chair
4.2 3
ltVC�.. �dV� �pwt�'pvJ
� � � -��ss- -�'oK �.����w �.., 4.24
6431 �ITY AVH� N.B. ����1� � N S'l
FRIDLEY, l�IId 55�32 ��Dev�elCQloe�at �ipar�it
(612) 571-3450 ,� -7 � _ � OS� (
[ %
_�' : «r � ='� i='�� ��� �' • .:•.
P�JPER'1�Y II�D�TIoN - site plan required for sut�mittals; see attached
�.�. �: �?60 �d�f�t�:v S7�
Legal descriptioai: „
,
� i y z.� z, I�� Y ���� �� ��� �► �� � l�
airrent zor�ing: E. square foata�/a�reage //0 x//b
Rea..SOn for s�ecial use �rn+; t: � �L00 D pL A� l'� �
SeC.'tlOIl Of �.'�1� OOC�: ��-/ r v"i •�• C��
FEE di�il�R II�OI�'I'I�1
(Contract Purd�aseYS: F�ae Owners mLSt sic� thi.s fonm prior to prooessirxJ)
rrr� (/G�. l � � ��1 FY�
� � vo �3 � ��� �v ��-.
r. r• •
�� � �,r�-36yy
�
�.................. ........,..,.._........_
►• i
• ��:-�. � I ` • ♦
�
� • t I • '�: 1
C h � . . , � ' /, ,�_� � '
� r . � .. �,.
_ - • 1 � �� l%�.-� _ �i a '
1 I � � • - •.- :��; • . •�� • • • •
� � . r
- •�� _�- • i i
A�11CdtlOfl YEOEIV� bY:
sa�a�ea Pi�i� o���► aa�: �..�he Z�� � 9'9 /
Sc��eduled city Oo�mcil date:
r _
�
J
Community Development Department
PL�ANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 28, 1991
�.�
To: William Burns, City Manager�.
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT:
Special Use Permit, SP #91-03, by ABRA
"ri
Attached is the above-referenced staff report. The Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request
to the City Council with the following amended stipulations:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The expanded parking area shall be paved and lined with
curbing.
A six foot high screening fence shall be constructed to
enclose the storage area.
Stipulation #9 from SP #87-11 to enclose the dumpster shall
be completed.
A performance bond in the amount of 10� of the construction
costs of the outdoor improvements shall be issued to the City.
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
NII�I/dn
M-91-140
� 4.26
� S
TAFF REPORT
� APPEALS DATE
, C�'��F pLq(�NG CONMAISSION DATE : February 20, 1991
'��DL,� CITY COUNGL DATE : March 4, I 991 AUTHOR BD n—
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION
SITE DATA
SIZE
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LANO USES
� ZONING
��$
PARK DEDICATtON
ANALYSIS
FlNANCIAL IMPIJCATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
COMPATIBIUTY WITH
ADJACENT USES 8� ZONNG
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATI4NS
STAFF RECOMMENDATtON
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
�
SP ��91-03
ABRA Auto Body Refinishers of America
To allow exterior storage of materials and equipment
7710 University Avenue N.E.
1.16 acres
C-3, General Shopping Center
C-3, Ge*_:eral Siioppin� CenteL to the North and South;
M-2, Heavy indus*_�ial to the West; Spring Lake Park to
the �ast
No
Yes
Approval
Approval
SP �i91-03
ABRA Auto Body
o a� i / �T� �.� .�ti"� � ^
6 <s� `� � G, �� � �� :; 4:�
� I, � (1;� ; � � S : c : n: W �
, (l;) �, z , � V
..���.�.� W 7920 � ��E �' �' �c;+ ; —
*w •°1 � , , �� � ,, �p;i �� ,.�"� a . � ;
.. ( � A�' /1 � � �
I Z � re S W
a
1 �
�.r�l � I; B Cs�) ,� F �:) 6 �l�tiM�.'�� 2��� � � N-+
.{s. <<..�r .isr.c,.ras i �, �►';� � •� / p
l.ae.r�. I I �ti�.y _J ir __,f "+ � ! s'.�'s !�� ., �
1 �t a
� f' �i i � p'� � � ', �11e� r y `o ' .
? 7f * NI 11 � . • \ ,
�� ti 1LJ'1Y�f.�6 ��� � ,i,� � � C" - _L
.. ' j cl�.� fAJF 1 / N.'•. '� � � °��9A - �r � •
� ' � . ...... �
h ' w� /!. \ ... �._
� F
i f . . 1
�j�g 4°'+1jII � �4�� ° - . '1l�,�d
7�9� ' 8 a� -� Z� r('_� ���� _ l� O
� /
� 7b9s 7920 -7aae �: _� �
�t� (o� J: „ �.- �
rl � � ' 7 b7 � �i � � � ,
� �;) � • _
� ��f� � ' —
I .fiv..iw�rr� . � � �
��
.. -� � �� A -�� � .
�, �v,.- ,..�,.�.r,. s. � .
�;� -�- �
ti
3 �� G N. � 2 z � :� a
� ��� : I �f� � � M y (3) . �.. . � i � �
�, <��> � l0 � 78�� r► V
S� 7a�S I� w �
Q � <f)
E A A -�f�-_ �
_� .
-, •- ..: . . ;: �
V` `�e �
. � I y � . ; _____ ,.—.
S .: �
j., ,,
, ,
� H• 2 � a. M G 8 (s� I': 7 73 � e
i� � (��
�' � �7�3 �'� o '�� y
Qs � � :. �
,r ,. A, ��a � � �'f ao
., • �' ''' � •y
_� /�,� � :Y : �t �' �..$�'�. .�.�.' �
s i .: . � ,
� _ ��03 ( ..�. �.'�tr�'�{�;;: •' � �
� ��02 ��a3 ;.�: �
� 8 :� : �:� : � �: :�:�: :�:• ' ,
-(�s� � s- ��::::�.• ._ ';�oo•.
. - ' 7�03 , 7 �rs� (�)
�� , f�, , 7l
�y ,ea � wwr.!k. j:;.l.
� �:70 � ,� I .. �"' , `1� �s
.v►' r a �
1 �'
--- �/ I,�-•- l.•ef- �s�� �M �
� A.'/Jl1J�A!' �Sr v�....vw.rry I �
�"t � • �/
33 _s
LOCATION MAP
4.29
Staff Report
SP #91-03, ABRA Auto Body
Page 2
Request
ABRA is processing a special use permit in order to change
stipulation #1 from their original special use permit, to allow a
repair garage, which was�issued on July 6, 1987 which prohibited
the outside storage of damaged vehicles, parts, and equipment (see
attached Action Taken letter). The request is for Lot 4, Block 2,
East Ranch Estates 2nd Addition, the same being 7710 University
Avenue N.E.
Site
Located on the parcel is a one story brick building which is used
to repair vehicles damaged in auto accidents. The property is
zoned C-3, General Shopping Center. There is additional C-3 zoning
to the north and south, with M-2, Heavy Industrial zoning to the
west. The City of Spring Lake Park is located east across
University Avenue.
Analysis
Section 205.15.O1.C.(8) of the City Code does allow outside storage
of materials and equipment with a special use permit. The
petitioner proposes to expand the parking area and fence this area
to store damaged vehicles and equipment. The petitioner originally
agreed in 1987 that there would be no outdoor storage of damaged
vehicles. The petitioner has been storing damaged vehicles in the
parking area over the last six months (see attached correspondence
from Steve Barg, Code Enforcement Officer). In addition to storing
the vehicles outside, the petitioner has failed to complete
stipulation #9 from the original special use permit which required
that the dumpster be stored inside or be enclosed in a masonry
structure compatible with the existing structure.
The City has determined that outdoor storage can occur in the C-3,
General Shopping Center district. Northtown Nissan, directly north
of the subject parcel, was granted a special use permit for outdoor
storage of vehicles including boats. Northtown Nissan's storage
area is fenced, but does not have slatting. As proposed, the
storage area should be screened from public view.
The expanded storage area should be paved and curbed, a screening
fence should be constructed to enclose the storage area, and a
masonry enclosure for the dumpster should be constructed. In
addition, a performance bond for 3� of the construction costs of
these improvements should be issued to the City to ensure that the
work is completed.
4.30
Staff Report
SP #91-03, ABRA Auto Body
Page 3
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve special use
permit request, SP #91-03, to the City Council with the following
stipulations:
1. The expanded parking area shall be paved and lined with
curbing.
2. A six foot high screening fence shall be constructed to
enclose the storage area.
3. Stipulation #9 from SP #87-11 to enclose the dumpster shall
be completed.
4. A performance bond in the amount of 3� of the construction
costs of the outdoor improvements shall be issued to the City.
Planning Commission Action
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the request to the City Council. The Commission also voted to
amend stipulation #4 to read as follows:
4. A performance bond in the amount of 10� of the construction
costs of the outdoor improvements shall be issued to the City.
City Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
�
�
i
��
�,,
�-
i
�l
o �-
I
1
,
,
, �
�� �� �
,_, � r� i'
W �i2 r. k
1
�1 E�!� �
Y �
u e' 1 _ ,
g, ,
,, � ...,.
�
..o.m..°�'�
�
�
;,
�n
(�
-�a
u
t:_o)
r L �►
; � s
�
v� .SS 1�
� ,�,� � c;�:�t� ' ;,, j'
. �i=-� • �
Y1� � •
- � - --- i �- - --- - ���� `. . . . , S
I - � -- y
•0,2 =�0,5 .O�SZ _0�0.� 1
M-- - '
i _ � ' °-:4
i
� .._.
� �
�
� �
� ��
� i �
i, � r �� � I� 1
� i �
`�'�.-�►-- - : -i i , � S
_ � i�, i
y[Q1 \� 1 �
I � �- , ! —� !�; ' •: •� ; `t� ' 1 i
_� �== --- - - �1� I '� 1 I � 1 . ' }
� �` � 1 1 1 f�
,i ��� ►-,J �'� � � 1 y
� j-- \-• —� I I �• •--- t� h
l -, I �p
/ � . .. _. . _-'• �, �1) � -� `(�Y�\I � 2 h �
� - I :4i� �� +� . � r
�� 1 � ;
,
.I � �
;; x� u � � �
'� �� �i� �� n' �j�1�,: � � � �� � �� ti i
1 l,• ` • U� �
� �,� 4'� �t�w � ���� !' � °,
� � � � » Y� �, �4 �i h F �'; � � � S; s� ' �
�N, 5>,> i� ���p�,�$ � 4� � 1
;[� � `'11W � )� p2.��j f 1�; ��� +
, ���t�'U �r��W� N3W Y��l� i / A
" � � - -
- -. _.. . -- 7 1 °-- - •i ` _--. .. .... . _. _._.. i
/ �
� .
�+ � + - -- — - �--- -�-----=- - -�
�, � � � _.
���, � i . _� _ - - �- - -
-.�
,o;oB ' �
, ,,;'s.
- ,�, - - � �- .�,- - -- -- - - - -- --
r� _ ,��J�� �' —. .._ - ---� -- -- � -- -
�=u1
� u t�r _
� ^ � ks�
�� ' U� t� ��Y�
;;,�,� � � 'M3 �c, �i�`�l
t •
'! Area to be Enclosed �
I I i � � � I
I I I I �. 1 I I
i I I � I i
i j I I I � I I
_ � _ i . i i. _ � _! __!
nna� i.. ic..c+ n c
�� ��
: �
' i � �i
� � O �u
� �
II
z-
- }4. 1
wp y
„
��i
n�
! ��
�i
I ��
8, �
�,
��
N
ll� �
� w .,
.,z �
`� � ,
�4 I
��.1
P1!-:; �
,� ,
�'�y t,
.��r
� � � �,
�
I1�Y1�
i
�
�. :
�u �.
�,; v
-- g 'qC `�
� �1
VC �
V g
`� ,�
. �
3� � a .
J
�
w �I �
� ^
� �;
0
SITE PLAN
�
�
ctnroF
FRIDLEY
4.32
CIVIC CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 • PHONE (612) 571-3450
� � ! � ���1
�., _��_� \.�I «
Jim Benson Se�r 24, 1937
Greo B racibury
620 Menc3elssohn Avenue, 51�ite 137
Mitu�eapolis, I✓,N 55427
Qz July 6, 1987 the Fridley City Council officia].ly apprwed your request for
a Special Use Permit, SP #87-11, to allaw a repair garage on Lot 4, Block 2,
East Ranch Estates Second Addition, the same being 7710 University Avenue
N. E. with the follaaing stipulations:
1. No outsicle storage of damaged vehicles or any parts or equignent allowed.
2. Prw ide proof c�f permits f rocn Anoka County to handle haz ardous wastes.
(completed)
3. All averhead doors anc3 man cbors to match building striping.
4. S1�pply building facade materi�►1 samples for staff approval prior to
pezm itti ng.
5. Pra�ide addition�l evergreen screening of averhead door areas. To be
incorporated on lanc�cape glan b� 6J29187. tcomgleted)
6. All green areas to have automatic sprinkling.�on ��a„5�
7. Pravide ooncrete curbing 5 foot setback of f building where no overhean
aoors are Flanned. �oh �kw�y�
8. Provide plans and specifications for odor mitigation equignent. Draft
f il tr ation sy stan to be appr w ed t� Staf f. (compl eted)
9. Ampster to be stored insic3e or in a masonry enclosure compatible with
structure.
10. All roof top equignent to be screened frcm view.
If you have ariy questions regarding the above action,
Flanriing Department at 571-3450.
Sincerely •
anes L. Robinson
Planning Coordirator
JLR/dm
please call the
Please review the noted stipulations, sic� the statesnent belaw and return one
cop� to the City of Fridle� Planning Department b� October 8, 1987.
oc : Rd�rt Schroer - - � " «l/, ,
� CI
ncur with action taken
� 4.3 3
r • _
C� ■ l V■
FRIDLEY
FltIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (61?) 571-1?87
January 10, 1991 �
Stre've Weisenberger� Hariaqes
A� Auto Body
7710 Lfiiv�ezsity Aven�e N. E.
iYidley, I�J 55432
RE: Final Notioe of Nc��rxaplianoe of 7710 ifiiversity l�w�ue N.E.
Dear Mr. Weisenbe�er:
On Nw�ber 19, 1990, I seTt yvu a le�tter �*��*!Q failtin+e t� ca�ply with two
stipulatians of your special use peYmit, SP �87-11, �ich allaas the vperatio�
of a z+e�pair gaiage at the abwe address. �,e tw� ft�s of norioompliar�oe were
as follvws:
1. No artside stozage of damaged vehicleS ��Y Pa� �f �P�t
allva�d.
2. D�mpstes to be stored it�ide o� fn a n�asa�zy enclosure oa�patible
with the stnx.�.
Sinoe that time, I have spoken t�rith yvu twiae ar�d caciducted sevP*-�1
reisLSpectiaLS. You have indicated an interest in applyirg for a special use
permit allcwirg artside storage of damaged v�icles in a portiact of ycur presP�t
P��4 area to be scre�ned bY aPPr'aPriate fe�cing. D�pite statir�q thi.s
ir�tentior�, ta�e have nvt reoeived a aaaple�ted speci.al use pezmit applicatiar� fran
you, and my z+eoet�t c�bservatians reveal ti�at ti�e two it� renain in
�liarr�e.
It is inportant that you �it a c�leted special use �*�►;t applicaticr� or
mayce neo�ssazy arrair�e�e,nts to ccr�c.-t tl�ese tw� violaticc�s by January 18, 1991.
Shaild you fail to follvw either ane of tl�ese cptiocLS by this date, I will refer
this matter to the City Attorn�ey foz px�os�eaitirn. Feel free tv call me at 572-
3595 if you have questians or wish to d+�G this further.
Sincer+ely,
Steven Barq
Plar�ing Assistant
SB:ls
oc: Ba�aza Dacy, Q�ity Develcp��t Ditectc�
Mici�ele McA�eison, Plarming l�ssistant � CE-91-07
�
�
�inr oF
F� ��
4.34
FRIDLEI' MUNICIPAL CEtiTER • 6�3?i UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MN SS-33'_ • 16121571 _'�450 • FAX (61?► 571-I'K7
November 19, 1990
Steve Weisenberger, Manager
ABRA Auto Body
7710 University l�venue N.E.
Fridley, I�1 55432
RE: Property at 7710 University l�venue N.E./SP �87-11
Dear Mr. Weisenberger:
On July 6, 1990, the Fridley City Council issued a special use
permit, SP �87-11, to allow the operation of a repair garaqe at the
above address, subject to ten stipulations (copy attached). A
recent inspection revealed noncompliance with the following two
stipulations:
l. No outside storage of damaged vehicles or any parts or
equipment allowed.
2. Dumpster to be stored inside or in a masonry enclosure
compatible with the structure.
It is important that ABRA operate in full compliance with all terms
and stipulations of this special use permit, since failure to do
so may result in its revocation. Please discontinue outdoor
storage of damaqed vehicles and make appropriate arrangements for
dumpster screening immediately.
I will inspect the property on or shortly after December 3, 1990,
at which time full compliance is expected. Please call me at 572-
3595 if you have questions or wish to discuss this further. Thanks
for your coogeration!
Sincerely,
Steven Barg
Planning �►ssistant
SB:ls
cc: Barbara Dacy . C-90-973
4.3 5
PLl1P�NI��G COMMISSION MEETI��G, JUt�E 3, 1987 PAGE 9
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CO��SIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #87-11 BY
J. BE� S01 At D. B B Y:
Per Section 205. 5. ,, 4, of the Fridley City.Code to allow a repair
° garage on Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Secand Addition, the same
.being 7710 Universlty Avenue N.E.
MOTIOPJ by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Svanda, to open the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the public
hearing open at 8:35 p.m.
Mr. Robertson stated this was a very complex case. The next three items
were inter-related. He stated the first action was for a special use permit
for a repair garage along University Ave, on the west side, north of Osborne
Road. The property was zoned C-3, heavy industrial. A repair garage was
a use allowed in C- 3 only with a special use permit. In connection with this,
agenda item #3 was for a lot split which ��as part of a split and a recombina-
tion of existing parcels in order to get sufficient lot size for the auto
repair facility (item #2).
Mr. Robertson stated item #4 on the agenda was a vacation of two existing
easements: (1) a 20 fi. drainage and utility easement; and (2) 112 of a 30 ft.
street and utility easement. This must be done because the existing sewer
line would have to be relocated which runs currently along the rear property
line to a point west of it. (Item #2)
I�r. Robertson stated he met with one of the petitioners, �1r. Jim Benson,
and there were two issues Staff felt should be brought to the attention of
thP Planning Comm�ssion: (1� the fact that there is no record of an easenent or
dedicat��n for a road connectin� to Ranchers Road, although it was the petitioner's
undPrstan�'�ne.that they do exist. The lack of this piece would make access io these
parc�is��i�tiCUlt, if not impossible, thereby inadvertently creating land-
locked parcel which was not in the best interest of the owner ot the City.
(2) the position of the piece of property that was left to the north--an
awkward left-over parcel which might, in fact, be of little value to anyone
unless the petitioner has some kind of development plan or staging plan
that addressed the ultimate development of that �iece.
�1r. Benson stated he was the developer working with the company, fIBRA,
who will be building the building.
Mr. Benson stated that currently none of the property, Lot A and Lot B, was
landlocked because it was all owned by Bob Schroer. The piece of land that
Mr. Robertson had referred to was noai awned by t4r. Schroer. So, today what
they were talking about was putting the new repair facility on the eastern
part of Lot C and tot D and the balance of the property was owned by Mr. Schroer.
The questionable piece was �l�e h�brthern part ofi Lot A, and they do not want to
�-se� rt bec�me landlocked.
Mr. Robertson stated Staff was recanmending the following stipulations:
i
�
� 4.36
PLAPl��I��G COM�tISSIO�J MEETING, JU��E 3, 1987 PAGE 10
' 1. No outside storage of daMaged vehicles or any parts or equipment allowed.
2. Provi de proof of permi ts from Moka County to handl e hazardous wastes.
3. Eliminate one overhead door on the east side of the building.
4. Al1 overhead doors and man doors to be tan colored to match building.
5. Supply building facade material samples for staff approval prior to
permitting.
6. Provide additional evergreen screening of overhead door areas. To be
incorporated on landscape plan by 6/29/87.
7. Al1 green areas to have automatic sprinkling.
8. Provide concrete curbing 5 foot setback off building where no overhead.
doors are planned.
9. Provide plans and specifications for odor mitigation equipment. flown
draft.filtration system or better required.
10. Due►pster to be stored inside or in a masonry enclosure com�atible with
structure.
11. All roof to p equipment to be screened from view.
Mr. Benson stated Randy McPherson who was Presi��ent of ABRA and
Roland Benjamin who ovmed IJorthtown Nissan and who was also part of the
project were in the audience.
Mr. Benson stated they have a problem with stipulation #3 regarding the
elimination of the one overhead door on the east side of the building. He
stated ABRA was a national franchise. This would be their national proto-
type building. Alot of thought has gone into the building, and they have
worked with the City in terms of the materials for the building. He stated
ABRA was in the autobody refinishing business, and their whole concept was
to take the auto body refinishing business fror� the "back yard" type business
into a first-class customer-oriented type of business. They are currently _
located on 81st and University. He stated ttie flow of the business was such
that the cars go in one door and then the finished product�comes out the
other door. He stated these doors are in the front of -the building, but
they are not sitting open for the public to see. That second door was only
open to take the car out of the facility and then it was closed again, because
that was a critical area when the cars come'out of the paint room. This door
was also a second exit for cars that are being held for repair inside during
inclement weather.
Mr. Benson stated eliminating either one of the doors alr:qst rendered the
entire building unuseable. They have tried to mitigate the impact of the
4.3 7
PLAPJt�I��G COMMISSIOP� MEETIf�G, JUt�E 3, 1987 PAGE 11
doors in front. The doors were only 10 ft. by 10 ft. The striping of the
material and the combination of bricks and the design will go straight
through the doors. He believed the doors as they were situated with the
landscaping as proposed for the front of the building and the fact that these
doors are opened very seldor� would make these doors less visible to the
public.
Mr. Robertson stated with the upgrading of the University Avenue Corridor,
it was the City's general policy to limit any potential unsightly building
fronts. So, they are asking for the same th�ing from all developers along
University Ave. in order to enhance the appearance of University Ave.
f4r. Benson stated they would have no problem with putting heavier landscaping
with evergreens in frnnt of the overhead doors.
Mr. Benson stated they also had a problem with stipulation #9 regarding the
requirement of a down draft filtration system or better. He stated he would
let Mr. I4cPherson describe their equipment.
Mr. McPherson stated they do not incorporate do►•+n drafts, but use a"cross
flow" and it was all OSHA approved. Everything they do is OSHA apprnved.
They just had OSHA through their present building in Fridley about six months
ago, and everything was checked.
Mr. Billings stated maybe stipulation #9 could be changed to read: "Provide
plans and specifications for o�or mitigation equipment. Draft filtration
system to be approved by Staff."
Mr. McPherson stated he believed as strongly as the City that this should be
a good looking building. They are really trying to set the standard for this
type of industry. This plan will be their national role model. He wanted to
bring people f rom all over the country to see what they have done here in
Fridley. He hoped in a couple of years to build a corporate facility and
training facility in Fridley, so they plan to stay in Fridley and be good
neighbors. The one big problem was they could not eliminate the one over-
head door. If he could do anything about it, he would. One reason they have
the doors to the south was because of the restaurant to the north. He did
not think people using the restaurant should have to see cars coming in and
out.
MOTION BY Mr. 8etzold, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairpe rson Billings declared the public
hearing closed at 9:10 p.m.
MOTIOP� by t�lr. Betzold, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend to City Council
ap�roval of Special Use Permit, SP #87-11, by J. Benson and G. Bradbury, per
Section 205.15.1, C, 4, of the Fridley City Code to allow a repair garage on
Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch Estates Second Addition, the same being 7710
University Avenue N.E., with the following stioulations:
�
�
4.38
PLANNII�G C014MISSION MEEfING, JUNE 3 1987 PAGE 12
1.
2.
� 3.
-- 4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
�b outside storage of damaged vehicles or any parts or
equipment allowed.
Provide proof of permits from Anoka County to handle
hazardous waste.
Al1 overhead doors and man doors to match buildinq.
Supply building facade material samples for Staff approval
prior to permitting.
Provide additional evergreen screening of overhead door areas.
To be incorporated on landscape plan by 6/29/87.
All green areas to have automatic sprinkling.
Provide concrete curbing 5 foot setback off building where
no overhead doors are planned.
Provide plans and specifications for odor mitigation equipment.
Draft filtration equipment system to be approved by Staff.
Dumpster to be stored inside or in a masonry enclosure
compatible with structure.
All roof top equipment to be screened from view.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Billings declared the
motion carried unanimously.
3. COI�SIDERATIO�J OF A LOT SPLIT, L.S. #81-04, BY J. BENSON AND G. BRADBURY: •
Sp it off parts o ot an , oc , ast anc Estates n Ad itlon, _,-
to create three parcels to be added to existing tax parcels, generally �
located at 7710 University Avenue N.E. ��'
Mr. Robertson stated Staff was recommending the following s�y�Clations:
l. Parcels A and B to be added to Lot 1, Block l, Ranch Estates
First Addition to preclude landlocking remai ' g vacant property.
2. Parcel C to be combined with Parcel r new development and
recorded with lot split.
3. Any further subdivisions of cant property to require a replat of
the area.
4. Legals for lot s , L.S. #87-04, subject to County approval; if not
approved, a will be required as per County direction.
5. A par e of approximately �2,841 to be paid prior to recording
sp '. Exact amount equal to square footage X.023.
� Benson stated they did not have any problems with the stipulations.
0
C•�
4.39
COIINCIL I�ETING OF JIILY 6, 1987
B. COKSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL �E PERMIT. SP #87-11, TO AI.LaFI
A REPAIR GARAGE ON LOT 4, BLOCR 2, EAST RANCH ESTATES SECOND
ADDITION, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7710 UNNERSITY AVENUE N.E.,
BY J. BEKSON AND G. BRADBURY:
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, etated the Planning
Commission revieWed this request for a special use permit at their June 3
meeting and recommended approval With ten stipulations. He stated the
petitioner agrees With these stipulations.
Mr. Benson, the petitioner, stated Mr. MePherson and Mr. Benjamin Would be
the oWners of this auto refinishing business. He stated the entire concept
is to have a first-class customer oriented business. He stated ABRA Would
be involved in refinishing and light suto body xork and hi�-tech equipment
xould be used. Mr. Benson presented photos of a similar building and
drawings of the proposed structure. Iie stated the building Would be very
attractive With brick and rock face block.
MOTION by Councilman Goodspeed to grant special use prmit, SP #87-11, With
the follrnring stipulations: (1) no outside storage of damaged vehicles or
any parts or equipment allowed; (2) provide proof of permits from Anoka
County to handle harzardous Waste; (3) a11 overhead doors and man doors to
match building; (�) supply building facade material sa.mples for City staff
approval prior to building permit; (5) provide additional evergreen
screening of overhead door areas (to be incorporated on landscape plan by
6/29/87); (6) all green areas to have automatic sprinkling; (7) provide
conerete curbing 5 foot setback off building Where no overhead doors are
planned; (8) provide plans and specifications for odor mitigation equipment;
draft filtration equipment system to be approved by City staff; (9) dumpster
to be stored inside or in a masonry enclosure compatible With structure; and
10) all roof top equipment to be sereened from vieW. Seconded by Couneilman
Fit�patrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
mation carried unanimously.
THE
COMMISSION l�'�E
A. CO2ZSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S.
PLAZA, GENERALLY LOCATED SO(JTH OF i�1EST MC
OF HIGHWAY 65. NORTH OF MOOiiE LAI� AND WE
BY ST. ANTHONY V ILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set
July 20, 1987 • Seconded by Councilm Fi
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared th motion
B. CO2ZSIDER
OF LOT 1
S OUTH OF
OF MOORE
INC.
TION OF A V AC
■rmTmnvt
E DRNE, EAST
OF CENTRAL AVE
�
:NG OF JUNE 2u
SHO
E. EAST
publ ic hearing on this pl at for
t�zpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all
carried unanimously.
MOTIO�Y Couneilman Schneider to set the • publ ic hearing on this vacation
3��
4.40
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Notice is hereby given that there will be a Public Hearinq of the
Fridley Planning Commission at the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431
University Avenue N.E. on Wednesday, February 20, 1991 at 7:30 p.m.
for the purpose of:
Consideration of a Special Use Permit, SP #91-
03 , by Steve Weisenberger for ABRA, per Section
205.15.O1.C.(8) of the Fridley City Code, to
allow exterior storage of materials and
equipment, on Lot 4, Block 2, East Ranch
Estates Second Addition, generally located at
7710 University Avenue N.E.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an
opportunity at the above stated time and place.
DONALD BETZOLD
CHAIRMAN
PLANNING COMMISSION
Publish: February 6, 1991
February 13, 1991
Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley
Community Development Department, 571-3450.
SP 4�91-03
Steve Weisenberger
ABRA
Steve Weisenberger
7710 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Chase Company
5353 Gamble Drive, �i310
Minneapolis, MN 55416
WBDH Realty Co.
7810 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
WBDH Realty Co.
7825 Washington Avenue S.
Minneapolis, MN 55435
Pannekoeken Huis
7730 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Kennedy Transmission
7700 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Kenneth Niebuhr ��i
7501 Hyde Park Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55435
Machining Inc. �
7773 Rancher's Road N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
William Minder ,Jl.��
2100 Lyndale Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55405
Bob's Produce
7620 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Robert Schroer
7620 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Malmborg's Nursery
7616 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Flower City
7618 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Planning 2/1/91
MAILING LIST Council
University Station
7610 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Planning Comm. Chair
City Council Members
4.41
CZ'I'Y �+' FR�LY
6l31 DNIVERSI'1'Y !�Vffi�ll� �T.E.
FltIDLEY, !�T 55432
(612) 571-3450
.. �� ._ _� ._ _ � �
'1'*1N1� 1�_1: ' :1'. � V • ��:is
�DPEt�'Y II�TIoN - site plan required far sutniittals; see attaciyed
Aaare�:
`���u . Un� �cr
�
r� a�e�'i�tio�: __�t Qc�: �r (� �.,�� � t--
� y ai�x Z �Aaa��a, �as�- �.wcl►:�5�-ts S� �
a�t �_ (' — 3 s� f���
REaSOl� fOY' Sj.�EClal l]82 DeYini.t � Er. � c.-,r p� ✓ i'� � i- �c, eA k r<-P� C�o� d.v,a �
-�D ✓ O U� O r STa ✓Y�- c,� d L P�!'c { S 9- �Ot ✓���
Sec.�tion of City Oode: �
_ „_ � ,.� ��• � �-. •. �. .
i0o�tract Rur.hasers: F'ee Owr�ers mist sign this form prior to prooessirg)
NAME �� Vl(� )� (_131M 0 � �" �/
�ss .�3 S� �w�� �� �� �3 r a
PHO�E SZ 5- i o 0 0
n� _ /_ �_ / —`�/
_...._._�..�.._�..,__..�.._.r..�.,, __________
ru� ��C ljl�l/Sl�t �Cr� �
�FSS _'7 �/0 c1�; ✓�c,�si �y �ve, /�
i,
�� r,►; � a:
j�
ns,rrn� �� �S 7� —�6/ a
� � V �� ;�
Fee: " S2oo.o0
Sloo. oo for resiaential seooa�a aoo�ssoYy builaings
�t sp # ��—o�- �� # ��99'�
.
Applicatior, r+eoeivea vy: Y�I �P.�, 2� �I�ie.�,r�
Sc3�eduled Plarming Oarmissioci date: u� `�
Scheduled City Oo��cil date: /
___.._........�...,.. .... _............,..,........�....�....___.,_�_
�
�
� _
�
.
Community Development Department
Pi,ANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 28, 1991
TO: William Burns, City Manager,�,�''s
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Lot Split Request, L.S. #91-01, by Charles
Seykora
Attached is the above-referenced staff report. The Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request
to the City Council with one stipulation:
1. The portion to be split shall be combined with Lot 7 and
expressed on one tax statement.
Also, please find the resolution approving a lot split, L.S. #91-
01. The Planning Commission recommended unanimously that the City
Council approve the proposed lot split, to split 3.5 feet of Lot
6, and combine it with Lot 7, Block 5, Pearson's Craigway Estates
2nd Addition. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the
attached resolution.
MM/dn
M-91-141
4.44
RESOLUTION NO. - 1991
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT,
L.S. #91-01, TO SPLIT OFF THAT PART OF LOT 6,
BLOCK 5, PEARSON'S CRAIGWAY ESTATES 2ND
ADDITION, ANOKA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, WHICH LIES
SOUTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 3.5 FEET NORTHWESTERLY
OF AND PARALLEL WITIi THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF SAID
IAT 6, AND COMBINE IT WITH LOT 7, GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 7836 AND 7830 ALDEN WAY N.E.
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the
, 1991 meeting; and the Planning Commission
stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, such approval was to split off that part of Lot 6, Block
5, Pearson's Craigway Estates 2nd Addition, Anoka County,
Minnesota, which lies southeasterly of a line 3.5 feet
northwesterly of and parallel with the southeast line of said Lot
6, and combine it with Lot 7, generally located at 7836 and 7830
Alden Way N.E.
WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey
from the owner; and
WHEREAS, such approval will split 3.5 feet off from Lot 6 and
combine it with Lot 7, Block 5, Pearson's Craigway Estates 2nd
Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the
petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County within six
months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and
void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY
DAY OF , 1991,
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
4.4 5
EXHIBIT A
Resolution No. - 1991
1. The portion to be split shall be combined with Lot 7 and
expressed on one tax statement.
� 4.46
�� � STAFF REPORT
APPEALS DATE
' C��QF PLAWWNG COiVINq$SION DATE : February 20, 1991
FIZIDLEY CITY COUNC•IL DATE : March 4, 1991 AUTHOR 1�i/dn
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION
S1TE DATA
SIZE
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
8� ZONiNG
UTlJfES
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL IMPUCATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
COMPAT�ILITY WtTH
ADJACENT USES 8� ZONIIVVG
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
�
L.S. 4691-01
Charles Seykora
�
4.
S//2 SEC. 3 T. 30,
cirr
31
OF FR/OLEY
S�EET ' ,�.;; �, I 5
. � . 4�+�����1 , .
�
� `
,..�.,+� ;1�, , .
� ; 7'� �• � r gTaf � t. I� i" � `5 � --� ` \ \ i�°� :
k , �•' '' .`a�' a _ 'ar .-.
�� � �,� ..,` : a� .�� �� . � � ,.
, �yk•. ,• � � ,1 ° l � ,' S ✓ �'' ' �' � I . ��o v ; -� Na:
" i,� � � .I. . �, r. .. .. � W �r, o a- �
�� .�'"4��y j' ,� �'��� !' �+r_� 1' 'iyn ' • .y.'� m � •i. �.ti
� • ,,,,, �t� : r° . i.. � � � �� � � r^ �
w, r,. i p �,�!? `��' �" rET 4� �� `� ts� � s�; �� � a, I, 1�1 1
, : E " i
4,� iN � � � ;�� {r �• , � � � � - � , 1
o�•� ` �k.:Y� "b � �•,N � ari;'~ _�. �, ;' � ELY :
� ` .� � • t: , i� j.� j� .
.���.,,: r�' ., , � +�, i , , � i � � � � I ' �' � � a y:• .; c�{+I t�. �+. a e►�' +e ' � ,
� .,y �• �� `•' 1„ •' ,NJ � � t �'1 ', , "'"7 - '"�."'y.j �'". F",�"i.- ':uu t �:�•:�' �
, -r. �• �• � �-
w � y � Y` j' .la � -Iqr
. � .r %b �'y� . x �� ' �i . '! � !� = ` � i,� . . . -'� .
� �(��r � '1. �� •11�I, . I � Iry i •� : .. v�. S . .. ' i
"..'�� � r� � � � T 1 1�r. ' ; �� � i. r. �. - .�� � . �/ - j �` i'M b� o � Na : i �n o►' Iw 2 �fI
, �, r . , � = 1 ��=' ' �
i��` � Z ' .` t h� �i�. � �� . ' � �. �`•�� t¢ � �� � ` „ �• �' � .' � ' ;.'. . r` :f 1
� + � ... ,� ,
%� � k'.' • � Y�.` LIlENTY •
� ✓ • y� � �- � , V �.,, �.i
� • 'a „�,� �'' �' 1 ;�F•1"j � . .�� � i �. .� \� , i je ' 1*, �� y� i I �Y }: �'�"i..,r Q
��. ' � n{ iV � T �. .r�,.,u. .; �\ �� �, �Wr�N ' I�'.1rF• � W��N'T
'r"��X .M�' .r ( t��• ' i� k" '� _�. •(1� i
�. r���' ' �� •1 T ``` .,r,, � /i � ui� .i,�jr.r � •✓ ,� �F,�p�::� �.4,d�- ;�
° �� .�'w�u�. V G �, �}y. = � � � � s� � y {� •'�.
* F \ I.
���� �`�.� x� T �� � LdN6fE�LOW � p
�,���t �� , �� ,• �, k! b { . •t �-ajy/�y :u�p�y��r�i � � �.s b° � ' � i vN � \ . � �f �' s� � N '
y,�� .�, � ;.1� t , �y ��` 'F - • ) '/ y. r',y",�' o �r I � \ , +�C-��� ` a�
� p,S��,� ��.� -�T^� Y � p �. •I •�� `N
_ � �, \ `[ � � ' r Y�
'�} tCF,F.N ��� Al�}i �-/Ai I Y41 I~J O 1� I,� � f� ,. � � ,i
\ .� j_ � � tr.{� . �w 'I).e rW \S�f F •�'•N V.(.sw' �
:� 3 � �+� +•'-1{ �11� � ~— + '�• �9-�I��+�^.'�JtTA
y7�' , "° • ..:� "� .., ...+o,, "`.; \`•,•7 ' A�Qp,'
�\ F ' ti� „ + ,` ! � �.ty � / �
� \\ 'r• �`' "/ir,, +Y,;���:.,� � `� D?
A \ �l; \ %/ 'I• (� +P+ •� �"r - ��'� ..�.
[ c ) \ �` \ lf�a ,\\ �` �0' O� •• �h'� 9`O / ,V +.
V �
, 11 , � � ~ � fti .� Qft,pQ� .Y e. Gc �Q tj �s .
v • \ \• ,-�. .n� �: /� , � i5:' , w.
� ` r�
� ��� . `��y,t ��, �� �, " 5�,�. MEAL
33 -�O �� E p • `" a P �� •� �r
P � � w.
.,;, ��� Fv • ,Npi� y; ' °� � �i., � s (N i u ' � �
� � p�f' Cr, b •,�P+ q °'' ` ' •�'� `
/ � ' l� (•), /r�� ,ji� �
� i�,~• a.. - •�' v � w . � ''t �
�fr� _ „• p�Q(i, � „� ` 9s, l�i, /� , .. Tp
O (�; � is
� , M •�y� J�, �Y, • i' A�I � p \
� ' ' ` i« :�v' "J../ '�( iw, ,�, .G' l� ' �
' �.'�a� j —:v • �� ��` ,�.:' % !h •L +�' ,• �r, �� .
:�� �L � !�� � . �. �• ,,
� . � � V y .. .,
\ � �, �l�' w �`�:� � �/��1�• f. °^�� 'P+ -
� \ ��r:, � + ��'. �Ir ..�` � ,, � .
�O � \ \ �a � �� ` ir I ��' � OQ� � �MI
GZ � �; �F �-^ ..;':,�+�'�'�P F�
� � \
� � \\� '�° - � , �Y' � ./�y `Q' �,4. \�1
'� - �. •/A r '�`� I� `i
. --- �X t � 1 L '� �T ' �-
` -\ `�_ � � � (, � •' I . I
� 1 �,� S /M LbRMfR `� ��
� i„ flC. !
O -- \, �. �'�`
�
LOCATION MAP
O
�
r
�
/
�
SPRf�I
BPR001
:..
�
s .■,
:...
:'= ....
.-.
..,
�.� :
�.,.__
� .ri�
�.iii
'����
' °:
� v
��
�F/! i
� ► ���
l
O�
�� �
�. . � s
; + � *,.'
� . � �. ,, �
�
�
� �, � �• �.
�♦+ : ��� �
� 4 �� � . �
�9 �—
.
� �o.t
;�.
.,
, �
.�
.
7 S_
,.,-- ► ! :
..r. � � .. �r . � is' . • i [' - S �..�
L.S. 4�91-01
Charles Seykora �.��
� � � ,,� f � ���`�N� •� � r�
3-.� �''' ,� �:� � �`� � � �
�� �
.
� ,,,� �„�; v j^� ��� 1 � ,
�
.,\ �, , � � � � � w
: ,� {^, �r-, � �
� � �
�' �� �„� � � E„� •� F� �
' � . � �: � � � :��
°3 �'� `�..
4 ` "�
tir .� � , � , . ~l !L ` 's.
� `• �/ J, ��n � � . •. ��� �'!� `I///.
v . a�
a ��
i
Rt� /
� ���
. K �,
i4
�
�� ��
oP
�
• • • � •� •� - - . • �F �/
• • • �, ��� •�• 4 •� ����.
� � i � J.. � • ►� �,�� � �, . � � .,�. • :. •, '
;\ ' , �� �� t •1-� • � '�w �.s • � •�
'� '�'R � .�1 ♦ s� � .�..�..r:.�., , ♦ • •
; `�,^ � a � • • • • • • • • • • • � i � " i ' �,
' �, R ( � �� • • • • • • • • � •
l � �.. ♦ • � • • • • � • • • • • • Z
` � � � ,�..a� Q 1 ,�' �.` �,,�•�•�• • •�Z ��• •,i39•�•��r '•
� . .,� � , � , � ,� ; .,. . . . �� . .,b .,.;�
\ .,\ ��. . � �� �S �� �, •�'iE� • •���iid����,Z `
�� � . � � � � � • � • � • I • • • � �'
� � �, ! ,� � 1 °� ♦ • s • � � • • • • d • • . pL.
�� � ' �'� • � � � • • r • • • • • • •
��\ �', �� • � � ,t • g �py �� •���• • •�• • • • • • ���
• ♦ f T�A�
� � _ . o� �� i, 0 �� , ` , ,� - � o� •,., � .�1��. . • �
�� , � � pi�' ,• � i � � • � •
• � � . � 1' 1� S � ' ,S + ,�� •
� S _ . • • ♦
� ., .
' � � �• • 1 ' •1• ; � � 23
� �\ � 1� ' � '� � • ,�
.• � •' t� .� • � � �,.� � , IVD
� . - • ti' S ► � � /�► : AQ� %
ZONING MAP
4.49
Staff Report
L.S. #91-01, Charles Seykora
Page 2
Request
The petitioner is proposing to split 3.5 feet of Lot 6 to combine
it with Lot 7, Block 5, Pearson's Craigway Estates 2nd Addition,
the same being 7836 and 7830 Alden Way N.E.
Site
Both lots have single family dwelling units located on the parcels.
The lots are located along the Mississippi River bluff line and
overlook the Riverview Heights park and the Mississippi River to
the west. The properties are zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling as
are the parcels to the north, south and east. Riverview Heights
Park is zoned P, Public.
Analysis
The proposed lot split is relatively minor and will not create nor
eliminate any lots. The purpose of the lot split is to rectify an
encroachment of a sidewalk from Lot 7 onto Lot 6, Block 5,
Pearson's Craigway Estates 2nd Addition. Both lots have a width
of 100 feet and lot areas of approximately 21,000 square feet. The
proposed lot split will not adversely impact either lot nor will
it impact surrounding lots. The new legal description should be
described on one tax statement.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval
of the proposed lot split, L.S. #91-01, to split 3.5 feet of Lot
6, Block 5, and combine it with Lot 7, Block 5, Pearson's Craigway
Estates 2nd Addition, with the following stipulation:
1. The portion to be split shall be combined with Lot 7 and
expressed on one tax statement.
Planninct Commission Action
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the lot split request to the City Council.
City Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
iui�i n1551sstYYZ BLVD. N.W., COON R1lPIDS, MN
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY; Charles LaRue �
� ...� ALDEN WAY �
) UO.�O . N 41'29'W_�
. 1 ' , •
1
L.S. ��91-01
Charles Seykora
�4.
�I � . ` .
� =. � I .�: o '^ .�
�
s
m
�
, tz. ta.-ss � �. ``` T i
.� � ti- '� ` •- •`^y s,
\ � � � �' e� S
� N tAt � �- --='- — .
�L4.4� �+.7 Q� � o � �� � �
�
� I-S-F V1/AlK'OUT ; � �� �� � �
�V JJo.7B�G ; 3 �� � �--
� . sis � ,�o.�. t � t:� �I �°
2'!.5 ,� '�� . �1 � � �R `�
� V. 3 � • � � � �' .Yi
� � ,�' , T�
,; ''•: � .
N o =I �
� . = �:�
�, � � � . .
_ � I '
, a DETIIIL OF ELEV1►TIONS
a� . �
a
v •,
rY �j Denotes Iron Set
� � � '
0
K
� Denotes Iron Found •
\�► . .
� -Q Denotes Wood Hub on .lini
I
6668-258/20-2Z .
.�
�� • I�'
� 100.0 54I•�B'l�'E Lot 6, Block S,
PEARSON'S CMIGWAY '
ESTl1T6S 2N0 11DDITION,
' . .. , , Anoka County, Minnesota
• .
1 N�1!!�Y C�11T1/Y TNAT TMIS 11 � TIIUT AMO COIIII�Ct Ilt�lltflNTATION 0� A 3UItVtr 0/ TNt �OUNOARIlf
0� TM� A�OVt 0�1C�1�10 L�NO, ANO TM� LbCAT10N 0' A�L �NILOIMOS� TNI�ION� ANO AL� V111��1 •M• ,
t�OACNMtMTI. 1� AN�. ��OM 0� ON 1�IO�ANO. '
A1 fU�V�Y�O �r M� TNII.'�h...«....OA� 0� .....�pr.i1�NN1���M�NNN�N\�N����A.O. 1���•...«.«.
. N.�. NOIUM� ��fO�JjT�1� �� � .
//' .d
�
i
SITE PLAN
�
cinr oF
FRIDLEY
4.51
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287
February 1, 1991
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The City of Fridley Planning Commission will be holding an informal
hearing on a request for a lot split, L.S. #91-01, by Charles
Seykora, to split off that part of Lot 6, Block 5, Pearson's
Craigway Estates 2nd Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, which lies
southeasterly of a line 3.5 feet northwesterly of and parallel with
the southeast line of said Lot 6, and combine it with Lot 7,
generally located at 7836 aand 7830 Alden Way N.E.
Anyone who wishes to be heard shall be given an opportunity at the
Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, February 20, 1991 at the
Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University Avenue N.E., at 7:30 p.m.
DONALD BETZOLD
CHAIRMAN
PLANNING COMMISSION
I
il
L.S. �i91-01
Charles Seykora
Ronald Crego
7854 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
MAILING LIST
James Hanson
7824 Pearson Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
I.M.V. International Corp. Thomas Stevenson
7846 Alden Way N.E. 7819 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432 Fridley, MN 55432
I.M.V. International Corp. Segwald Reckdahl
6870 Shingle Creek Parkway 7g23 Alden Way N.E.
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Fridley, MN 55432
Victor Seiler
7842 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Charles LeRue
7836 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
John Meador
7830 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
James Black
7824 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Karl Schurr
7818 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Yevette Pawlyszyn
7844 Pearson Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Curtis Obermoller
7838 Pearson Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Leonard Shea
7830 Pearson Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Harold Mernin
7829 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
William Stevens
7835 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Clint Ward
7841 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Bradley Richter
7847 Alden Way N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Planning 2/O1/91
Council
Barna, Guzy, & Steffen, Ltd.
Charles Seykora
301 Anoka Professional Building
403 Jackson Street
Anoka, MN 55303
Planning Commission Chair
City Council Members
4.52
DEC 27 '90 17�06 STEFFEN & NNJNSTENTEIGER
C7'I'Y O�F tRi�EY
6431 �rl'Y AVS� N.L�.
�Y� I!N SS�32
(612) 572-3450
P��.53
•. ,� • - _ _ •, • ►
_ Yl�� � IL
'1 � ��_ �.. �► •_ �.:,y
�MYMM Sl��y ' � ,
��PEtL'1'Y�Il�1❑I�t�t�?��j •• S]'� p�l �Ql7�B� 1'C� SUbt��ttS�b" j!i@E �BC�'fAC� _....
�� 78 Alden Wa N.E., Fridle , Minnesota 55432 ��
� � �
ptiari:
� 5 Blxk 5 ���p,���� Pearson's Craigway Est��es t�
i�ion
�rr�-r�t zat�ing: i].e famil �resid 4g acres
�re foetage/acr��ge 21. Z00 sc�. ft/• .
liea-SOA tar' lot $plits Wish to se11 3.5 foot atrip of pxoperty �o adjoin�ng landowne�,
since adjoining landowner's aidewalk encroaches onto �his propertiy. �
.r....,...�.r..._�...,.�..r.,.�...r.�...�.,.,...,,..�__., �
........,..,.�...._,..r.�...��,..,..,�....._..,,,,,....
F�E ��*rn�r
(Contract Pu:rc�sers: Fee Owners must sign thfs Po�m prior to pz�oae�-�siuxJ)
NAME John T. Meador and Collene D. Meador
ADCR�,S 7830 Al.den Way N. �., Frid7.ey, Miruiesota 55Q32
(Lot 7, Block 5� Pea�son's Ccaigway EsCaies ��� �E
SIC�,Ttk�E � �L��=.., � �i?Ii�TE ��7 - �y
J V T. Me r o ene . ea or
M/ V �r��/M�yyyrllw.y�IM/rr^/y�1/IOMr W/N�y�r�/M�YIr �+�I�/41�yM�IIMr�I� W w1Y11���w�1/1�MIY�1rMMMI V A�r��I�/1Y�w
w�. r-- �G--�
I�,i� Charles M. Seykora. A�torney at Law
� 341 Anoka Professional 8uildingr 403 ,7acksan streer,
Cv: , �:
55303 �yT,� pHp� 427-63Q0
•,�nc.� l!', /' S.l
�� . s� , 9-
�� $100.00
Permit L. S. #� I—� g�
AppYic�tia� r�eoeived i�►:
� � �� � .
. .� � '
Sc�ech�led Pl.annirg Can�m,sssion date: (
Sc��cluled City Oau��cil date: � .
ROBERt A. f3UZY
BERNARD E. STEFFEN
RIC1{ARO A. MERRILL
ROBERT C. HYNES
STEPHEN H. MUNSTENTEIGER
PoCHARD A. BEENS
RONAIA B. PEiERSON
DARRELI A. JENSEN
.�FFREY 5. JONNSON
RUSSELL H. CiiOWDER
JON P. ERICKSON
UIWRENCE H. JOHNSON
Ol1V1D A. COSSI
THOMAS P. MALONE
January 15, 1991
I3ARNA, cuzY & s�•Lrrrrr, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT lAW
301 ANOKl1 PROFESSIONA� BUILDINQ
<03 J/1CKSON STREET
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 5530�
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
612/A27-6300
FAX: 612/427-6929
Attention: Community Development Department
In Re: Lot Split of
Lot 6, Block
ESTATES 2nd
Minnesota
Dear Sir or Madam:
Strip of Property off of
5 , PEARSOI3' S CRAIGWAY
ADDITION, Anoka County,
4.5 4
MICHAEI F, HUALEY
THOMAS L OONOVAN
PAMELA M. HAFiRIS
SHARON L HALL
KENNET H A. AMDAHL
CHAIiLES M. SEYKOM
WILUAM M, ►iANSEN
JOAN M. THIEMAN
BEVERLV K OOpCiE
DANIEI. D. GANI ER
JOAN M.OUADE
SCOTT M. LEPAK
STEVEN l. MACKEY
OF COUNSEI: PETER BARNA
NANCIE R. THEISSEN
LAW(iENCE M. NAWROCKI
PATENT, COPYRI(3H7
�hD 7fi1DC1SA.^,K lAW
Enclosed with this letter, please find a Lot Split Application Form
which has been fully executed by Charles E. LaRue and Pamela M.
LaRue, the owners of Lot 6, Block 5, PEARSON'S CRAIGWAY ESTATES 2nd
ADDITION, and John T. Meador and Collene D. Meador, the owners of
Lot 7, Block 5, PEARSON'S CRAIGWAY ESTATES 2nd ADDITION, and
myself, as the Petitioner in this matter. Also enclosed with this
letter, please find 1) a copy of a survey of Lot 6 and part of
Lot 7, Block 5, PEARSON'S CRAIGWAY ESTATES 2nd ADDITION, 2) a copy
of a portion of the half-section map showing these two parcels of
property, 3) a copy of a deed from Charles E. LaRue and Pamela M.
LaRue to John T. Meador and Collene D. Meador, and 4) a check for
$100.00 for the lot split application fee.
By a review of the survey, you can see that the sidewalk of the
Meadors encroaches slightly onto the property of the LaRues
(Lot 6). To correct this encroachment problem, the LaRues agreed
to sell to the Meadors a 3-1/2 foot strip of their lot along the
southeasterly boundary line.
The deed from Charles E. LaRue and Pamela M. LaRue to John T.
Meador and Collene D. Meador is for a 3-1/2 foot strip of Lot 6.
The legal description used in this deed has been approved by the
Anoka County Registrar of Titles as correct, and is a simple
fractional legal description as required in Minnesota Statutes
Section 508.47, subd. 2, so that a registered land survey is not
necessary to record this quit claim deed.
0
Cit� of Fridley
Attention: Community Development Department
January 15, 1991
Page 2
Please contact
assistance I
application.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
4.55
me if there are any additional documents or
can provide to proceed with this lot split
BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN, LTD.
� z� �.� i�i- S-sz �---
Charles M. Seykora
CMS/ba
Enclosures
cc: John T. and Collene D. Meador
Charles E. and Pamela M. LaRue
Universal Title Insurance Company
r �
�
_ _�
Community Development Department
PL�xx�NG- D�SION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 27, 1991
� /e,,.
�v
TO: William Burns, City Manager �,
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Variance Request, VAR #91-02, by Vance and Mary
Nelson
Attached is the staff report for the above-referenced request. The
Appeals Commission, at their February 5, 1991 meeting, voted
unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City
Council, subject to approval of SP #91-02. Staff recommends that
the City Council concur with staff's recommendation to approve the
variance request for the existing condition, but to deny the
request for a proposed addition.
IrII�'t/dn
M-91-92
� 5A
�► STAFF REPORT
APPEALS DATE Fet�.n�y 5, 1991
CI-IY OF PLAMWG CON�VASSION DATE
FiZlDLEY CITY COUNC:IL DATE : March 4, 1991 AUTHOR ��
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION
SITE DATA
SIZE
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
8� ZONING
UR.rTIES
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL IMPUCATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
COMPATIBILITY WITH
ADJACENT USES 8► ZONNG
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
VAR #91-02
Vanoe and MaYy Nelson
Zb reduoe the front yard setback fran 35 ft. to 14 ft.
and 21 ft.
600 Buffalo Street N.E.
12,100 sq. ft.
E�l, Single Fa¢nily Dwelling
F�l, Single FaQnily Dwelling to the N, S, E, &[9
Yes
Yes
P,pproval for existing oondition, denial for addition
Approval
VAR ��91-02
Vance/Mary Nelson
_ -- _ ---- - 5B
S !/2 SEC. .:
C/TY OF
� 31
�.
SZRE S ' � , •w I � �
'V'"�"" `` �� � f' � .�� 1 �
���� ,`" ' \ \
�,r'S��^',. ; ° �1.�. ° ST�E� �".'�,��. •`a t� �� �' _�'�� - :r
N. "'rX4�T �p a' ♦ C ! � r �, SO ` � �.. r .' .� ?'r'.! � � . ' . :
.� ����� �1 � .r �� r '�j � ����a t +1. . ' W I IM1.it� ;�
� ,N�oMt `� �:•j �.,1`'��t�' X •�I+r> 1° ;.i'� ��'a�: .N_.� �.e�' ' i
• F � �•'�..1 � } �* Sp .k,��..i „� •�EEt .e , - , I r\, „�F'J' 1 �1 �s r b ;I� ��.� ^
., � i � I • � �� • • I
+,\., O'
.�� �� k; �%�' � � y..y" �1 �,NI � �.j.�'+'� \`. � ' _ � ELY
.�,. . �. ,��1+�, ° ,. .w�' � .� �', .i,l .
�, 1\ \ ^ ,� /\ ` � .'ni.�1 wr .��; � ; .`� , �I� I %�. I � frl '� � `/ ��J � ,•� ••,j' f�u� �M��Iw� w I
�' � '�. wW . M.'i A
� :r �,. �• '- • (' rI
� ( � •' •'-
o � �:�� � � :�:"�'. A - Z � �� � � i . � � � �� � ..,.
� �'�`.�1�� Ar� ;1. � � x T ,`aYt� •: �: ��� � � �i �*. � ' � � �.m. 7 �V � ,f1i �.�� �
p r+ ` -r ' �1v^" uV � � �.. � . +a fL ' � a ' '� _.- I . .
� � . ,v�; . \ '1, 9 � i• , � . y� �!�, •F Ah;Y�� \' ' '� � I ' � ' , a �Y' L � ..I 'w�, • f' i �
!� �'� j� K � , � ' � A � � Y'�', `Y��. �- LIlERT/ t ��1 ' F.,,, .
- �` V �'� `� � .1 � �F_�1'• I , /• . . .
r Y�� � \ ' v►. !,r��.
��� °�. R �,� � f ,,�. 1 ~, � ^` Y'' �R ; �•�, w , w^.- �� `*�v -r
/ �. '/'� � 'r f ti 1. t \ ..
.'� � :�„� �� 7L �� �� � .j' ��i �.��. �J .a ' .0
\ , 11 �p1 �'t�"„qrM' i '� �/ i(f1�7 � � i�.I +w /."f� :� w
.� a��'�, � *1r�.�, � .\, i�'� �.:"p LON6fEL�OW .\.
t � i'. i r`. ,•,t,. t• ~ ! 1+_�. �� - ~�a. � y: � '.iD M ;r��.�i+ �.0 �:�' �
f'� {'t .,', �� ��,� '6 .�. .�+�t X4 r- � ;•I. �slu,�-'�''Ir h 1 . .� �:'
� � , ,�� '�'" i.� , � ", �� ��
/ .\ _ S ° �,°`F F .kk4, �.`!N ��. �'.� w1 /1v � wi .r��, I� \\
' . ' �E Fk� 1 .i.«�t ', l-' �C � c.' ��� i �• •w ��.
� �2�' ''�-+T � �z'L�� � :.� �� �
� ' ♦
. A 9�c.� y. '° , .:' .... .,,�„�.. ' ":
v• � � .;v� �o..- %
1 �) 'IY , - y,' , � , � • � .
� / � ; 4p . � /ri ' • •. `� � �P'� ,� '
• � �s
��� .
. f1 � , � , ;Y>, w� � 'r� �'j' .
v• �� r Sv+ �_ � �� � Q �p •�
. A �, .` 1 ip � �P �,. ,� O � {;
v / \\ .'`' „ ,� „� •,. Q r y �s j/y. ...
p� .,,, �` I� �� ,.
33 -O `� PE :� -�i�.�' ;� .,�; ��..
� �.� Gn. ;• y a�..r '�, ., "� Y
�� '� `�'� �,, •� � .� n� •��� �r�
i � � .i _ �-��.'y �,�P 4� ,y^ �1 +M:
� � ~ �' � ' �,; • 9 � :
�� /.� - �` n P�Q�,, ,ry•, 9,r ' ,".�, .
� � ' �v g� �, ° �y w�
• � �, �►' • ,,r-
��� � � ' �� '• �"•�e r, s,: � a. . �
� �'� _' � ` ~ •� � -°` '�:'•,~ '� -
\ %�•
(
2 � , �� '� ; �;=_� / . �i�',� %� jrj� n '• .
� ��°"• ta N,O, �,' 'r �~, p'D�
�`oG L � �, ` �� • .,�`•.4 b
Z� � �,; �•'' ,
�,� .� , � � � ° .��`�;
_ � � _ .\-��- - � - - j;
',` ,,, S `
.
34 �
LOCATION MAP
.
,
- ,
� -
. - • � ,�,s��•� ,
- � .
A
UG �
. �='`' ' i
..��� • . ►�
1� ,.
.� � ��
.�.�•• * �
�,,:�} , �
�
�
��, �.,�.�.�� ; � " :.� �
. . �= ,:
, : �
�r'
t '"\��1 .�'. iiii
���•
• :�� •+•
�. . ..,�
f. . • u � �
�,�.—
11,�:['�i1 � AG
�iG�
`u�i
V i:��
�. I • � �
�s
��
VAR ��91-02
Vance/Mary Nelson
�F
iii���il�'�
- . • .�.;�
1,���
� ��
�!� I
�
3 �Q��
ti.�'��
�� �;
� � �
�� 3 •
� `� �
� �' �
��
,
, �. �
�
G • �
� f �
`�r /
� R1�
� ( `'�
�
, . K �;,
14 „'.
y
• , / � �r IR. N r
V
9
� K R ,/ Q
I " " ,�i 7�f t !� � "
, � , v ,, � , P
I 'i ` ` ��, 1.18ERTY
♦
' ` � ��
� � / ,�� �
•
�� ✓ � ��, LON� ILOW
` )►
I \ �� \ ' V� ,��� �
. J� � z
�\� . ..
, .
, �, , y •.•.•.,., .•.•.
`• E `• .
\ \\` \ • ` 1 lR /• \ ��t�' � • � •,, �
� � �
R I V E R V� W '�� ^ � ' . `�C-R f� , 1 '� • � :� a � •. • �
HEtGH�� �� a� " � • , � . •
� r4 �-, � �� Q ti �` � �, ��.�,
1 r
S1y •f�♦ ♦ � ,
\� i � � \,� ' G " < �~ ,� �
�� (� t�i �� � � �
�� � ' � � '� '1 '� � �AI+� � • c► �
\\ .� � �•� ! � v `+, . 1 A + �
� � � ; �. � , . ,ti � Q �P..
�� �(� �, t �� • � 0� � �•
�.r
' � , c � � � 0 1� . , � `o p,�j � � �
' ��.� �\.� • • �' � • 1 S � � S
ZONING MAP
Staff Report
VAR #91-02, Vance
Page 2
A. HARDSHIP:
B:
and Mary Nelson, 600 Buffalo Street N.E.
��Setback from street"
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
Request
The petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the required
front yard setback from 35 feet to 14.5 feet for an existing
condition and from 35 feet to 21 feet for a proposed two-story
addition. The request is for Lots 18-21, Block Y, Riverview
Heights Addition, the same being 600 Buffalo Street N.E. The
petitioner is also processing a special use permit to allow
construction of an addition in the CRP-2 district.
Site
Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit with
a detached two-car garage. The petitioner is proposing to
construct a two-story addition which includes a two-car garage
with living area above the garage. The existing two-car
garage will be removed.
The property is located at
section of Buffalo Street
the surrounding parcels
Dwelling Unit.
Analysis
the southwest corner of the inter-
and Broad Avenue. The property and
are all zoned R-1, Single Family
Bection 205.07.03.D.(1) requires a front yard setback of not
less than 35 feet.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-
street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way
and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building
"line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard.
The petitioner's existing house is 14 1/2 feet from the front
property line. To correct this encroachment, the petitioner
would need to reconstruct the house in a manner such that it
would meet the required setback.
The proposed addition would be 21 feet from the property line.
The design of the addition is such that the stairway to the
second story and part of the entry enters into the existing
dining area. It is possible that the proposed addition could
be moved to the south and redesigned slightly to accommodate
�`J �J
5E
Staff Report
VAR #91-02, Vance and Mary Nelson, 600 Buffalo Street N.E.
Page 3
the new location for the stairwells and entry. There does not
appear to be any topographic or site conditions which would
prohibit the petitioner from relocating the proposed addition
to meet the setback requirement.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend to the
City Council approval of the variance to reduce the front yard
setback from 35 feet to 14.5 feet for the existing condition.
Staff recommends that the Commission recommend denial of the
variance to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 21
feet for the proposed addition, as the petitioner can meet the
setback requirement.
Appeals Commission Action
The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of both
variance requests to the City Council subject to the special
use permit request.
City Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with staff's
recommendation to approve the variance request for the
existing condition, but to deny it for a proposed addition.
�
7
i..
��
�
O
' 'l �
,
� ' ' t�
w
�
�
�
W
t—� 1 j "'�
1�=��-
�o�nondw iNn�
_ nn�►n�n �
�'
�'
•.,�.� �-
n, r-
4' ,� �
� .
%
_.�_, '{
—,r �
T ,
�.�,, �
e
;
ONPt13M6 ~�
�wva� �aois-�
•---- ...�.6 e
nta o
...�._
VAR 4�91-02
Vance/Marv
1 •`� i 44
� i �
. "'�
. ;
.. ` '. � i
. ,�,
•� �
.���
� �� � o
�� � � �'�'� = e
� $
(7� sE�� � �
777 �/ Laj r � � +
^ � O y � � C
W� � .����� ; .
� �
�
z� � t�� � � �
~� � Yti��a 1�
z� � �� ,� ; �
�
v 7 w
Wg � �� ��� � €�
�� z 41��� � g�
�„ o � � ���� '" � °
w �
z� � s �?� � s � ��
�� • ��
}+� z 3 ���1�� !� �`o
� i � �s
�� v � � � ������ y �3
a+� ^ �, oc ��=�e �. ��
V�� � � � � �� ¢�,� s � �'
� • :
W � a � � �3��s� �� i
-. 3 � � L � g.
U� ~ � ti �� � C � N
�� � � � � H �' :��� �g �9
tA s
~I
�
�.
0
�
�
a
S
U
Z
L7.1
O
W
�
e►
d
z
m
0
-,
5F
E X I ST I N G SITE PLAN
0
�
h1
�
r
A
J
W
v
0
:1� � 1� .
i'�
. ^ �� OOC '
,
e•
_� �
�
�o � � .
� � � ��
Ilsl♦
� l �+� ,
_�• .....
O �
U
r►� �
V '
�
�o
~ LL w
W �
� �
z� �
. �
� �
z� �
� .
w; �
�� z K'
r►� Q `
V �
z� �
~„ W 3
W� z �
� V � � E
�i � � ,;, o
� � � � � '
i
W � � � �
U�
3 '
� ,
� ('
� = f
Qe � � :
VAR 4i91-02
Vance/Mary Nelson
�—�•i-j—=����
� :�
M�'�£ �
� '1
`7
.. . , �. , � _ �
ON �MC
3r���d �aols-�
��•��
� '- �Z
. 1�
��
�
� � � � =.
i �
7
_ & �3` a a w
�S � E
� �� � � ^
3 �� 'y �
��� ` �
� C
w
�
�� �� „ �
8��,�� o �
e
����a E y_
�� ' '
����� � ��
s���� � °�
� ��
3 � �
u
� � � � � � �y E 1 A
I� � �{ F �
'-' ��#��; � :
� ��F r � ��
i ��ir�� � �3
; �� � � � b � � , a
L yY�� � j �
3 ! � e � �
� Y � � '3 `� .°. '
i �� ��! 8.� �L'
� : � � dE G
�! ��i ��x1 oo ��
1 N
,t � ! s i � � '� `i. C
1 Z � • M C
� ��� � i S Y p y�
3 ` $
� ���i� 8� b�
...
~7_---1
.,�
�
�
W
0
N
<
�
a
_
U
Z
tiJ
"!_
�
�
�
.-��'•.
,, .,.
�
5�a
O
Z
ao
0
-�
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
•I•
VAR 4l9 ]-02
Vance/Mary Nelson
Q SF.Cp ND F IfY��. PLA�1 .
� 114 •'1=0"
51
�
;
r;
�,
�
--�-
�i
�,;
�,
FLOOR PLAN
7
0
. �
0Q
<
�
�
x
�
Z
. �
' /�' .
� ("/
L�
Y\
a
� �
_ �
�
VAR 4i91-02
Vance/Mary Nelson
5J
0
:
�
_�
.-.
�
SECTION
5L
Ms . Savaqe stated she was c n�
lake and disturbinq wetlan s
alternative. This is a c r
created by the petitioner.
to be within the epirit of
property. She would be incl
:erned also about movinq closer to the
She did not see thiB as a viable
dition that was preexiBtinq and not
�he stated the improvements are going
he code and will in fact enhance the
Lned to qrant the variance.
Mr. Kuechle stated he qener�
maintaining the code there
particularly opposed to the 2
simply giving up 8 parkinq sp�
Lly agreed. Alonq the east side,
would be difficult. He is not
�foot requirement on the north and
es. It is an alternative.
O�! TION by Ms. Smith, Beconded bS
Variance Request, VAR �91-01, t
from 20 feet to 15 feet and 10
special use permit.
pr. Vos, to recommend approval of
� reduce the hard eur=oval sofbthe
feet, subject to app
OpON A VOICB VOTE, 11LL VOTI�T�i 71Y8 �
1�IOTION C1�iRRIBD �I�Tl�iZMOIIBLY.
CSl�ZgpgR80�i BAVAa$ DECLP►RED THE
OM TION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. �
Variance Request, VAR �91-01, to
from 25 feet to 20 feet and 22 feet
18 feet to 15 feet for one-way traff
special use permit.
IIPON !1 VOICB VOTE � 11LL VOTING 717f$, C
MOTION CliRRZED QNANIMOIIBLY.
ith, to recommend approval of
iuce the driving aisle width
for two-way traffic and from
c,.subject to approval of the
BAVAGE DECL�RED THE
Ms. McPherson stated the City Council ould consider th 25 requ91t
and the special use permit request at their February
meeting.
Dr. Vos asked if the parking lot is stri ed at 9 feet.
Mr. Tempas stated the parkinq lot is stri�ed at 10 feet.
�ONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REOUEST VAR
�t9i-o2 BY VANCE AND MARY
ErT LSON :
Per Section 205.07.03.D. (1) of the Frodi4 5 lfeet�fortan existing
front yard setback from 35 feet t
condition, and to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 21
feet to allow the construction of a garage and Ravervi w 1Heights
Bpace, on Lots 18, 19, 20, and 21, Block Y,
5M
�PPEALS COl�IIdI88ION MEETINa. BRII1�iRY 5 1991 p�Gg 8
Addition, the Bame beinq 600 Buffalo Street N.E., Fridley,
Minnesota, 55432.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to open the public
hearing.
IIPON 11 VOICB VOTE, �I+L VOTII�TQ �YE, CS�iIitPSR80�T BAVl�aB DECL�IRED THE
�LOTION CARRIED 11PTD TH$ PDBLIC HBl1RI�Ta OP$N 71T 8:05 P.l�i.
Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at the southwest
corner of the intersection of Buffalo Street and Broad Avenue. In
addition to the variance request, the petitioner has also applied
for a special use permit in order to allow construction in a flood
zone. The property is zoned R-1, Sinqle Family Dwellinq.
Currently on the property is a Binqle family dwelling unit and a
detached two-car qarage. The petitioner is proposinq to construct
a two-story addition with a two-car qarage with laundry area, and
storage on the first floor and bedrooms and bath on the second
level.
Ms. McPherson stated the current Btructure is nonconforming as it
is 14.5 feet from the front property line at the shorteIn
encroachment. The proposed addition would be at 21 feet.
analyzing the request, staff looked at the fact that the house
could not be moved in order to conform to the 14.5 encroachment.
However, in looking at the addition, etaff felt there was perhaps
some flexibility in that it could be redesiqned to meet the 35 foot
setback requirement. Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission
recommend approval of the variance to reduce the 35 foot setback
to 14.5 feet for the existing part and to deny the request to
reduce the setback from 35 feet to 21 feet for the proposed
addition.
Mr. Kuechle stated Broad Street is not open as Bhown at this
location.
Ms. McPherson stated it is a paper riqht-of-way south of Buffalo.
The City has the riqht-of-way, but no street was ever constructed.
Dr. Vos stated this technically is a corner lot and asked what the
side yard setback would be in that instance.
Ms. McPherson stated the side yard setback on that side would be
17.5 feet.
Mr. Ruechle asked if there is a natural qrade there or if there is
a dike.
Ms. Nelson stated there is a dike. Because of the problems of
designing a structure in a flood plain, she and her husband worked
with a desiqner to conform as best they could to those
requirements. There is a naturally wooded area on the property
5N
�PPEALS COMMIBSION 1sE$TINQ. �BBRUl�RY S 1991 p�G$ 9
which includes almost all of Lot 21. There is a foot path that
comes in 15 feet from the corner and that area is raiBed. The path
qoes throuqh to 79th l�venue.
Dr. Vos asked if the existinq qaraqe would be removed.
Ms. Nelson Btated it would.
Dr. Vos asked where the 35 foot eetback would be in comparison to
the currently proposed 21 foot setback.
Ms. Nelson etated that with a 35 foot setback, the addition would
need to moved back 14 feet.
-� Ms. McPherson stated this is correct. The proposed structure has
approximately a 6 foot setback from the side of the existing
structure.
Ms. Nelson stated this house is the only house on that side of the
street. There is a garage to the west, but they do not own that
property.
Ms. Dacy stated there is approximately 60 to 70 feet between the
structures.
Ms. McPherson stated there is a fairly larqe change in topography
to the east in that area.
Dr. Vos stated he would assume there is a dwelling across the
street. What is the setback for that dwellinq?
Ms. Nelson stated these houses are not set back 35 feet. One
qarage is a few feet from the street, nnd the other two houses are
approximately the same distance from the street as their house.
Dr. Vos asked if Buffalo is a normal width street.
Ms. Dacy stated Buffalo is a 40 foot right-of-way with 5 to 8 feet
of boulevard. There is 20 feet from the center line to the
property lir►e. This area is a very old plat.
Dr. Vos asked the petitioner for their view of the etaff's
recommendation.
Mr. Thomton, the designer, stated that in designinq the home, the
existing laundry would be remodeled to make a kitchen and breakfast
area. This is an area where the Nelson's could look at the portion
of the yard which is private and more aesthetic. In the addition,
he has extended the west wall of the garage and cut off one corner
at a 45 degree angle to accomplish this. To put this further back
would cut off the view. There were restrictions in desiqninq the
50
APPEALS C�MKI88ION KEETIl�ia. l88RIIl�RY S 1991
P�GE �
addition ound lev 1 becauseo f lthe floode plain �requirements.space
on the qr
Ms. Nelson stated they want space on that side of the lot which is
aesthetically most pleasing, and they have tried to do as much as
possible to have a view on this area.
Mr. Thomton Btated one of the arguments for the eetback was that
one could not park a car there. There is enough room to park a
car in the proposed plan.
Ms. Nelson stated another reason for the setback was line of sight.
That would never affect them on that block, There cannot be anyone
else building to the east, because there the a riqht of way.
Adjacent is a private building. On the other side is an area that
floods every spring. There won't ever be any more building because
they would have to raise the level of the road. Moving the
addition would restrict the functionality of their home. In
ehowing the diagram, it would take away from the living area
because of the existing structure. Because of family
circumstances, the space is needed as well as an open area to the
kitchen.
Or. Vos asked how much more space would be added.
Mr. Thomton stated the addition is approximately 30 feet by 36 feet
or about 1,000 sq. ft. of livinq epace.
Ms. Nelson stated the natural state of the lot is She hadPspoken
to them. They do not want to take out any trees.
with neighbors and is aware of their feelings. The surrounding
wooded part to the south would be kept in a natural state. They
have been involved with action to the creek, Springbrook Creek,
including an annual meeting to help clean up the creek. There is
much interest to keep the area the same. One neighbor asked if
they intended to do anything with the woods. She stated they want
to keep that as is and wish to maintain the path which is publicly
used. The area is enjoyed by many and they want to see it continue
this way.
�OTION by Ms. Smith, Beconded by Mr. Ruechle, to close the public
hearinq.
IIPON !� VOICS DOT�D � PIIBLIC �HEliRI� CLOSED l�TA8:15 pEM��D �E
I�tOTION CARRIE
Mr. Ruechle stated he was in favor of granting the variance as
requested. If one looks at the site, there is minimal traffic so,
although the etreet is narrow, off street parking is not critical.
He did not think the visual impact on the neighborhood wou1T ere
that great because there are no other houses to the east.
is little choice but to qrant the variance for the existing
��
PP !�L MKIBS O I�iG BBR
a
structure. Denial of the second variance would require them to
construct their home in an inconvenient fashion with little visual
impact. Offsettinq will not improve that auch. Since they are in
a flood plain educes tthe number ofi optionsn evailable. �He gwould
level which r
recommend approval.
Ms. Beaulieu agreed. The front view of the proposed Btructure is
aesthetical wy �To makee the petiti nerbpu h itpback�l4tfeetrw uld
is there no
look odd.
Dr. Vos stated the existing structure would look out of place if
it would be placed 14 feet back. He would be uncomfortable to have
it that far back. d have tno f�alms labout rvotingat t pprove Sthe
of that, he woul �N
variance.
Ms. Savage stated this is a unique prop�o m ke tthe be t a of rthe
She felt the petitioner was trying
circumstances and felt this would be an improvement.
Ms. Smith stated she would aqree that the proposed chanqes would
qreatly improve the property.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend approval
of Variance Request, �91-02, to reduce the front yard setback from
35 feet to 14.5 feet for an existing condition, and to reduce the
front yard setback from 35 feet to 21 feet to allow the
construction of a qarage and additional living space, subject to
approval of the epecial use permit.
IIPON !► VOICB VOTE, 71LL VOTINQ 71Y8 � CHl�ZRPERSON BAV7IGB DECLl�RED THE
MOTION Cl�RRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Ms. Dacy stated the special use permit would be considered at the
February 21st meeting.
Ms. McPherson stated the variance request and special use permit
would be considered by the City Council at their March 4 meeting.
OTHER BUSIN�SS
Ms. Dacy introduced Ms. Beaulieu as the newly appointed member of
the Appeals Commission.
Ms. Beaulieu stated she is an attarney in Fridley with an office
located on Hiqhway 65, and Bhe teaches part-time at William
Mitchell Law School. She and her family reside in Fridley, and she
has three children - two children in colleqe and one child in high
school.
5Q
ADJOtJR�NT -
MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr. Vos, to adjourn the meeting.
Dppls 7► VOICS VOTB,
1LOTZON CARRZBD AI�TD
�D�TOORNED AT 8:30
71LL �8BR0l1RY�5 � iCHl1IR�pR88�L8 COI�II�iIB8I0 �ETING
THB
P.l[. .
Respectfully Bubmitted,
�t,t��� �
vonn Cooper °�
Recording Secretary
'�1 � �
�
PIIBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THF
APP$ALB COMMISBION
Notice is hereby given that the Appeals Commission of the City of
Fridley will conduct a Public Hearing at the Fridley Municipal
Center at 6431 University Avenue N.E. on Tuesday, February 5, 1991,
at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose of:
Consideration of variance request, vAR �91-02,
by Vance and Mary Nelson:
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City
Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35
feet to 14.5 feet for an existing condition,
and to reduce the front yard setback from 35
feet to 21 feet, to allow the construction of
a garage and additional living space, on Lots
18, 19, 20, and 21, Block Y, Riverview Heights
Addition, the same being 600 Buffalo Street
N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, 55432.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given the
opportunity at the above stated time and place.
DIANE SAVAGE
CHAIRPERSON
APPEAIS COMMISSION
Any questions related to this item may be referred to the Fridley
Community Development Department, 571-3450.
I G�ty Co�c:il
City Manager
Lhane Savage
567 Rioe Creek Terraoe N.E.
' Fridley, NL'�1 55432
NJary & Vanoe Tdelsan
600 I3uffalo Street N. E.
Fridley, NY1 55432
Gary Thamton-
4655 Zbnkaview Iane
Nbund, NN 55364
Garland Lagesse
7951 Broad Avenue N.E.
Fridley, NN 55432
James Bvwe/Resident
7919 Broad Avenue N.E.
Fridley, NN 55432
Stephen Stmdquist
630. Cheryl 5treet N.E.
Fridley, NN 55432
Clark Nasca�
614 Cheryl Street N. E.
Fridley, NN 55432
Gordon HedlLmd
1255 Pike I,ake Drive
New Bric�tcn, NN 55112
MAII�TNG LIST FC)R
�� # 91-02
M�.y & Vanoe Nelson
6Q0 auffalo St.reet N.E.
Frank Shi �'k
7901 Rivervi,ew 'Perraoe N.E.
k�idley, NN 55432
Bruoe Zhompson
6212 Hillsi.de Road
Edina, NN 55436
Bxuoe �hompson/Resident e��„
630 Buffalo Street N.E. I"`�
Fridley, NIl�] 55432
Margaret Iverson
7899 Broad Avenue N.E.
Fridley, NN 55432
B�rbara Bollig
581 Buffalo Street N.E.
Fridley, N�i 55432
Anthony 'IUrek.
611 Buffalo Street N.E.
Fridley, NN 55432
Ja¢nes Brady
641 Buffalo Street N. E.
Fridley, N�d 55432
Joel Marquardt
7921 Rivesview 'I�rxaoe rI.E.
Fridley, N�I 55432
5S
Earl GP�nill
468 Lcngfellvw Street N.E.
Fridley, NN 55432
Kevin Holmzn
571 - 79th Way �I.E.
Fridley, :��1 55432
Bergsagel and Rogness
16515 - 6th Avenue North
Plymouth, M�1 55447
Walter Rasmussen
541 - 79th Way N.E.
Fridley, �d 55432
Farl G��nill/Resident
555 - 79th [aay N.�.
Fridley, N�T 55432
R�bert Kohls
640 Clzezyl Street N.E.
Fridley, NN 55432
h-►�G , � � y � -�-°�,
� � � .�� ss fi�.����w �►
64 31 �IIVERSITY AVENUE N. E. M � � � M � ��'j' �j �r � �
FRmLEY, l+IId S5132 ty DevelC�t t
(612) 571-3450 �Q 7 �r l �f 3�
VARIAi� AP'PiSC�'1't�i I�i
P�PEtn'Y II�O�II�TIoI�T - site pl�n required far a�ittals: see attaci�ed
�.. �
Legal description: ;�r �p���C c dlil � CJ✓ V r�I
r� 1�� — I► a��x ��Aaa.��� � j f c� l�,,
current zoning: � I S�K ���^ square foatage/acneage I 1 v JC 1��
e r
Reason for varianoe ar�d hazdship: S{"I'� �G �� S�� �e �
Sectiaai of City Oocle:
F'FE aWI�Ft II�1�i�Il4TI�T
(O�r�tract Purchasers: Fee Owners mLSt sign this fornn prior to pr+oo�sing)
I�1ME Viy u p p � � P I S G�1 _
f,_� ! � �— GII_�%�AZ�J
SIC�ZURE
nA�rn� � _ `7��, - lo y Y
� J-18-�i
rL1111WtC�lt ii\CVi�7!'1i1\.14�
r� Md�� �e�so
...-�.
r�►� �!�?
��
I� • yM�y� ..'� �� � � .
,
n� I-1$-i i
-�- _.____._.�...... .............._�_.,
FEE: .
$ 60.00 for reside.ritial pra�perties
Permit vAR # ReoeiPt � 3� 9 d'3
�
Application z�eo�ived by: �
Scheduled Appeals =,._....; ^_ion date:
Shceduled City Ootu�cil date:
�
.
I _
_
�
Community Development Department
NG DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 28, 1991 � �
TO: William Burns, City Manager ��
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT:
First Western Development Variance Request
VI
At the writing of this report, I have not heard from Mike Spriggs
of First Western Development Corporation regarding changes to the
proposed site plan. Staff recommends that the City Council
postpone action on the variances until March 25, 1991.
BD/dn
M-91-146
MEMORANDUM
- Municipal Center
_ 6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridley, Minnesota 55432
��� (612) 572-3507
FAX: (612) 571-1287
William C. Hunt
Assistant to the City Manager
Memo To: 11ILLI� w. BIIRNB, CITY l[ANAG$R �,�'�
�
Fzoai: 11ILLIAI[ C. 8[T�TT, ]188ISTA�iT TO TSS CITY It7�TAaBi;-�
SubjeCt:
Date:
I1�IIdIINIZATION FOR HBPATITIS B
FEBRIIARY 28, 1991
I have just received the enclosed memorandum from Samantha Orduno,
City Administrator of Mounds View, regardinq the necessity of an
agreement with the City of Bloominqton in order to have the
Bloomington Health Department administer Hepatitis B immunizations
to Fridley Firefiqhters, Police Officers, and Community Service
Officers.
I have reviewed the enclosed agreement, and I recommend that you
present it to the Fridley City Council for action at its meeting
of March 4, 1991. Without this agreement it will not be possible
for us to avail ourselves of the services of the Bloomington Health
Department.
WCH/jb
7
7A
AGREEMENTFBE�yN THE CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON
AND FOR
PROVISION OF HEPATITIS B VACCINE
This Aqreement made this 4th day of March �
1991, by and between the City of Bloomington ("Bloomington") and
the City of Fridley �„ Fridley „��
WHEREAS, Hepatitis B is an infection of the liver caused by
the hepatitis B virus; and
WHEREAS, each year approximately 300,000 persons in the United
States are,afflicted with hepatitis B, more than 10,000 persons
require hospitalization and an estimated 250 people die from the
disease; and
WHEREAS, persons who may be at risk of acquiring hepatitis B
due to their job responsibilities include such governmental
employees as nurses, paramedics, law enforcement personnel, and
firefighters; and
WHEREAS, a key strategy for preventing the spread of hepatitis
B is to vaccinate individuals with a high risk of infection; and
WHEREAS, Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health,
has agreed to vaccinate employees of approximately 24
municipalities in order to minimize infection with hepatitis B;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the
convenants thereinafter set forth, agree as follows:
1. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health,
will administer the Hepatitis B vaccine to any employee of
Fridley
who consent to be vaccinated. Each
employee requesting i�arnunization shall be required to sign a
-2-
Consent Form, which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit A, prior
to being vaccinated.
2. Bloomington shall administer three (3) separate vaccines
Fridley
for each employee.
3. Fridley shall pay
Bloomington the sum of One Hundred and Forty Dollars ($140.00) for
each employee consenting to be vaccinated. On or before a date to
be determined by Bloomington, Fridley
shall remit to Bloomington the total amount of compensation from
all employees of Fridley who have consented to
be vaccinated. It is understood and agreed that such compensation
from all employees of Fridley who have
consented must be paid prior to Bloomington dispensing the vaccine.
4. Bloomington will conduct the vaccinati.on program at ten
to fifteen (10-15) separate clinics. Bloomington shall inform
Fridley of the location of each clinic and
provide a schedule for administration of the vaccine.
5. Bloomington shall provide to Fridley
a report confirming that the consenting employees of Fridley
� received the Hepatitis 8 vaccine on three separate occasions.
6. It shall be the responsibility of Fridley
to insure that its employees requesting imtaunization utilize the
available clinics at the designated ti.mes. Bloomington shall not
refund any payments to Fridley for employees
who are not vaccinated because they failed to appear at a clinic
during the times when the vaccine was being administered.
�
?C
��
Fridley
?. shall indemnify and
hold harmless Bloomington, its officials, agents and smployees,
from and against all clai.ms, damages, losses and eacpenses arising
out of or resulting from administration of the Hepatitis B vaccine
pursuant to this Agreement.
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
By:
Its Mayor
By:
Its Manager
CITY OF Fridley
By:
Its Mayor
By:
Its anager
FEB 2 8199 �
7D
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITIES PARTICIPATING IN HEPATITIS B
I1��iMUNIZATION CLINICS
FROM: S ORDUNO, CI'T'Y ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 1991
RE: *AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
*MEETING DATE FOR DETEF:MINING CLI1vIC DATES
AND TIMES
At long last the City of Bloomington has sent the agreement which
each of the participating cities must now approve before the
Bloominqton Health Department will order the Hepatitis B vaccine.
Over the past 2 months, I have spoke with many of you regarding the
status of the Hepatitis B I�nunization Clinic Program. For those of
you whom I have not spoken with, I will briefly outline what has
taken place in recent months as well as the current program
timeframe.
Background '
Last year, the Bloomington Health Department agreed to act as the
vendor for the immunization clinics. Cities wishing to participate
were asked to obtain signed permission notices from all employees
who were to receive the vaccine. It was our understanding that the
City of Bloomington would bill each City for the number of
employees receivinq the 3 shot vaccination series. However, in
January, the City of Bloomington informed me that all cities would
have to pre-pay for the number of employees receiving the series.
Evidently, the large quantity of vaccine Bloomington had to order
to accommodate the cities had a negative impact on their cash flow.
Before I had the opportunity to formally notify the cities,
Bloomington informed me that their City attorney determined it was
necessary for each participating city to approve a"hold-hartnless"
agreement and pre-pay before the vaccine could be ordered. Hence,
the attached agreement.
Timeframe
It is now necessary for each city to approve the attached
agreement, forward to the City of Bloomington a signed agreement,
7E
HEPATITIS B IIrII�JNIZATION CLINICS
PAGE TWO
FEBRUARY 22, 1991
a list of the employees who will receive the series and pre-pay for
all employees. Once all the cities have pre-paid, the vaccine will
be ordered. If these actions occur, the following timeframe can be
achieved: �
March 31, 1991..........Deadline for approval of
aqreement and pre-payment
April 1, 1991...........Bloomington Health Dept.
orders the vaccine
May 1-31, 1991..........Dates for the first set
of clinics
June 1-30. 1991.........Dates for 2nd set of
clinics
Nov. 1-30, 1991.........Dates for final set of
clinics
I have attached a list of the participating cities and the number
of employees which have thus far agreed to participate in the
immunization clinic. Please provide Bloomington Health Department
your most current list of na.mes. A signed permission slip will be
required for each employee as they receive the vaccine. If you have
employees who wish to sign up for the i.mmunization clinics after
your city has pre-paid, they will be allowed to participate in the
clinic. Their names will be added to the pre-paid list and
Bloomington will invoice your city for the additional employees.
The list of your employees, the signed agreement and the check for
the pre-payment of fees is to be sent to:
Rari Dusich, Epidemiologist
City of Bloomington Public Health Department
1900 W. Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, I�i 55431-3095
MeetinQ Schedule
In order for us to determine the clinic locations, dates and times,
I have scheduled a meeting for Friday, March 1S, 1991 at 9:00 a.m.
at the Mounds View City Hall. Kari Dusich, the epideiaiologist from
the Bloomington Health Department will be present to answer
questions and assist us in setting up the clinics.
Please RSVP to Michele Severson at 784-3055.
7F
HEPATITI5 B IMMUNIZATION CLINICS
PAGE THREE
FEBRUARY 22, 1991
If you have any questions, or need any additional information,
please don't hesitate to call me at 784-3055.
solmjs
HEPATITIS B IlVIlVIUNIZATION CLIlVIC
PREREGISTRATION
CITY
Anoka
Blaine
Brooklyn Park
Champlin
Columbia Heights
Crystal
Eagan
Eden Prarie
Excelsior
Fridley
Golden Valley
Hopkins
Maple Grove
Mound
Mounds View
New Brighton
New Hope
Robbinsdale
Roseville
St. Anthony
Shakopee
Spring Lake Park
Woodbury
NO. OF PARTICIPANTS
61
32
95
9
26
54
73
92
11
68
45
50
61
12
14
33
43
75
SS
27
14
7G
�
�
�
3
_
y��
�10
C85th AVE,)
co, RD, H
.,
W
i
�
A
7H
s
NORTH
CO3 RD, I
* Mounds View City Hall — 2401 Highway 10
3
�
�
Englneering
Sewer
water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
��.
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager[�. PW91-60
A'
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
DATE: February 27, 1991
SIIBJECT: Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1991 - 10 (Sealcoat)
We have prepared the plans and specifications for the street
sealcoating work.
We propose this is the second year of our 8-year program for
sealcoating the streets within the City of Fridley. This year, the
major effort is focusing on the Melody Manor area.
Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolution ordering
the improvement, approval of plans and ordering the advertisement
for bids for Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1991 - 10
(Sealcoat).
JGF/ts
Attachments
i
�
f��
� �,
I�pI�I'IQi 1�D. - 1991
vs_ • � • •�•�� �+• � � i• • � � s i:� •.� . . �i- u
•i•u :�• � � • � • :�•� :t:� i:� ���• : n: •��+' � �• ••� � a� i:�
• • :, • � _��+- •• •
�8, the City C)ait�cil of th�e City of FYidley has establistled a policy of
Sealooatit�g the City streets ori a regular basis,
�,5, the Public Works Dirac.-tor has sulxnitted a plan shawing tt�e streets in
r�eed of sealooatixyg,
I�"JW, �, B'� IT i�OLVID, by the City Cauncil of the City of FYidley,
Anoka Cauzty, M:vv�sata, as follvws:
1. Zhat the streets reoamnerrled for sealooatityg by the Public Works
D�ar4ment be sealvoated, ar�d th�e w�ork irYVOlved in said in�rov�nent
shall iiex�eafter be de.sicp�ated as:
gTl�P p pAp�TEGT PD. ST. 1991 - 10
2. �he plans arid s�ecifications pr�az+ed by the Public Works Departinent
for � improve�ment ar�d each of thesa, pursuar�t to the �our�cil
actioai i�eretofore, are tiereby approved ar�d shall be filed with tile
City Clerk.
3. 71�e wurk to be perfozmed urxler BTRE� II�liOi�FF�Tr Pi�TDGT I�U. ST.
1991 - 10 be performed tu�c]er one coa�tract.
The Public Works Direct.or shall a000rdir�gly prepare ar�d cause to be insert:ed in
the official r�ews�aper advertis�nent for bids upon tile ma]cis�q of such
improvements �x1ex such approved plans ar�d specifications. Zhe advertisement
shall be publistied for tw� (2) w�eeks (at least 10 days), ar�d shall specify the
w�rk to be d�e anci will state that bids will be a�ened at 11:00 a.m. oal APRIL
10, 1991, in tiye Qau�cil Qx�mbers of the City Hall, arid that r� bids will be
oonsidered unless sealed ar�d filed with the Public Works Diract.or azd
a000anpai�ied by a ca�sh d�eposit, bid bo�xl, or oeYtified c�lecJc gayable to t�1e City
of Fridley for five peroe.rYt (5�) of th�e ama�mt of � bid. 'I3�at the
advertisement for bids for STREET Il�RpVII�� Pt�TECT I�• 1991 - 10 shall be
substantially starrdard in form.
- ti�� • �. • .• • :,�. �:r. w .. �i wr •i- �:r. w •i� • �� r:� : r: ��• •�-
I r• .�:
WIIZSAM J. I�E - N�►Y�t
i MfT1 4�±�t�F
���;� r• • - • w � �•�
. .
•
E; •�M «� �• : �..:�•.-
BT�1' Il�QOVF1�lLNl' AiOJBL'P �UU. BP. 1991 - 10 (SS�LOO�i'P)
Sealed bids will be reoeived arid publiclY apened bY the City of Fridley, Anaka
Caunty, Minnesata, at the officae of the Public Works Dir�ect.or of the City of
FYidley, 6431 Univessity Avexiue, N. E. , FYidley, Misu�esota, 55432, (Tel. 571-3450)
on the lOth day oi April, 1991, at 11:00 a.m. for the furnishing of wr�rk ar�d
matexi.als for the follewing wdrk for the City of Fridley STt� II�pVB�I�
P1mJEGT I�U. ST. 1991 - 10 (BE�iI�T) .
�e surfave treatment proj ect oor�sists of � sealooatir�g �baut 235, 022 square yards
of streets in differe.rit parts of the City of Fridley arid c�oa�sists of the
followinq p�incip�al it.ems of work ar�d ap�,i�nate quarttities;
188,654 Square Yards Sealvoat with FA-3 Aggregate
188,654 Square Yards S�i after Sealcoat Applicatioa�
All in a000rdanoe with plarLS ar�d s�ecifications prepared by Jahn G. Flora, P.E.,
Public Works Direc,-tor, FYidley City Hall, 6431 University Averiue N.E., Fridley,
MN, 55432 (Z�el. 571-3450).
P1ans and specifications may be exam?*� at the offioe of the Public Works
Director ar�d caPies may be ab�tained for ttle �tracto�r's ir�divic�ual use by
aPP1Y�5 � � Public Works Direct�or.
Bids must be mac3e �► the basis of cash payment for werk, ar�d avoa�nied by a
cash deposit, oertified ciiec,k (oaz a respansible bank in the State of Minnesota)
or a bidder's bond made gayable witho�t oo�nditioaz to the City of �idley,
Minn�sata, �n an amamt of nat l�ss than five pement (5�) of the total amamt
of the bid.
The City �au�cil reserves the ric�t to rej ect arry ar�d all bids arid to waive arYy
informalities in any bids reoeived withaut e�lanatioa�.
No bid may be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days.
By ord�er of the City C�au�cii of the City of FYidley, Minnesata.
Diated this 4th day of Mardi, 1991.
Jahn G. Flora, P.E.
PUELIC WbRKS DIR�CZt�R
Publistled: �id1eY Foc�as Oo�stYUCti� Bulletin
March 20, 1991 Marc3i 22, 1991
March 27, 1991 M31�+ch 29, 1991
April 3, 1991 April 5, 1991
{_ . : �., - . � .�
t i� � � � �� ! ' ��, c'� ' 1 � i '
:: :R � �� � l,y �
i� n � _
t �'i � �-s� r' ! i�IST'7n',m � �' � �
., o � .� - - � e
-t;� �..,.� ... __ __ __ __ __ __ __ ____.-_-----= �- ,- �-- _= s -- "�.,:..��I '
-, ;: � 7 " ��' ..`_ ._ _ _- --.._: . -_- -- :_�� � .t
; � P: S �:i V �IllIM9T9q � �.V •M.�ATMLAN
:,•F�t7-V � U • • 0 2 7
a =
o.... � t :1v �.y•U � J C. . �
� � �`�L � �V .:g4 v � ,
� .r .3 . � i;: `. . ¢ ; :.
y�I �� �', � COUIOIQ CM • t �
Si ���� V • \,j �
� J�� J V� •
' ��. � u � ' .; . � q ;
s L..• JJ,? ► Q z �� }: ��,e� !{:.;F s
s� r" �' � C CI L � ! C�l+�R M �. • i: �� I� •
s� ' U� � r� - v�— ; i(; :�tj•ti:{ � R
�T=—� --- -- 1� ' s•a c
� •�
• r--- � . _. ,
_ �
R � � � ��! IC� •i
�,�_.::;,�
��� � �.�L
; �'_"� : � :
.. ::" �I
��-- • • r
:i:: _.:i:�
J� ,•�..--,.�-�'
, > �.
� � , c C• �1� I
1 �. � i;� �...�
�� �� �.. ' `� �
�-=-a. � ., ` _�
. ,. —
� �5== � �/� :i \\ I
� �?: `= � \`I
�: �
! : o d. � �
u�� �'� u
.
� ... ,�. ' a �, o a (y .y '
( fl r; v
6 "+ � : �
,, � � - s
c " F
� � p QJ i� , ,� J � � •
�I �' � _
` r C , �
. ? �
, �: � a � � c ,� I •�
,�� C, `J 7 !r � �y a
U- � R " ` /
�� � c+ � I a : •_° �
�, �, a �• ���'' �,,.:�a
' � 7 ,,� C � � ' �
�j`S I' e � � � ' 9 � I .. ~I
i j�� � `' � 9 �t L`� I
I a � t I
I . 7 � �r�
� � A ��
`�, v : s a - - - - - I
� '� � ^ �� '_ `� � I
J �
% * �� ' � :
� �� � ;
/ u '''
, !:� � .� � �
_,
i�
� � 1991 S�ALCOAT
��
-- �� PROJECT
��
�C
i �
I � _ "LOOSE ROCK" SIGN
�` - � "15 M.P.H."
� '
1
f
. ;
: ';
�
��
�,� .� :
�,.
� � �►:_:
. :�
�
�:
.�.---
'si' �?i
:• i�
�
.... .... ,,....... ..
�
11%
+' �
J �� ""'
/ �
/'' ��,
; � ,
�
, :;j
��
�2'. .4
� •!
I ��:����- -=
_
` �fl 4
S Z
� M ' q
e "
_���' �
�;; � �s:. , _.. ..:: - -_- -';
i. t i -:I,=.; =- ::•-
�� '=---=�'e��;t:'?'°'.�,��..:;i
�� ;! p ,
_ "ilL +:-' Cj �� �C���' '� R
�� ��= 1_NL � _ �^ '�-YYV_
�._..- -- ._. --...
. :�':�
` - ��=t:
, �
� � ,_� �
��.�
�,•",r`
�,• �
,� ��r
�� � �
. �..
� �
S
..... �.ti. •
°:�' �
=Z ��N M
t • I.� ..
r—
� �—
•i;� . •
�
��?'� �:�..
�I� :�
�s
, ii .
I':t '�.I:
:� ,.. � :�
i `; =
_-�---, _
� . �
• � �r
:�
. ,�
.�
�� ��
"� �� t`�v
�-., i i rr ;
UU': �
, M�N .�1 I • • ����.��
✓�
� ��
1��•
Engineenny
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Ma+nlenanc�
MEMORANDUM �,,
��'
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager � PW91- 6�
�.
FROM: John G. Flora,(Public Works Director
DATB: February 25, 1991
SIIB.TECT: Sanitary Sewer Project No. 221
(Hackmann Avenue)
In the 1991 Sanitary Sewer Capital Outlay budget approved by the
City Council, $26,000.00 was identified to repair the sanitary
sewer line behind the homes on Hackmann and Central Avenues. We
propose to repair the line through the insertion of an inverted
epoxy liner to the existing sanitary sewer pipe, similar to the
repair work on the Onondaga Street and Bennett Drive storm sewer
projects.
Plans and specifications have been prepared and we are now ready
to advertise for bids.
Recommend the City Council approve the resolution to advertise for
bids for the Sanitary Sewer Project No. 221 (Haclanann Avenue).
If you need any additional information, please let me know.
JGF/BN/ts
�
�
F�DL�Y
• �
RE80I�TPICN 1�U. - 1991
'I:r� • I ��. •1'I�'�I' � I I' '�• � J I:r� •.� ♦ . ��' '�
•I'J�':rl' � � � � � :il'� _1:r I:N '�1' : ��: _�• 1 V• '♦ �I:r"I:'1• y:rl• . �.
'�• :r • :I• M'1 I� i • � :il ill:
WI�2F,AS, the City Ca.u�cil of the City of Fridley has establisiied a policy of
repair sanitarY sew�r wh�n neo�sa�Y,
W�S, th,e Public Works Director has sukmitted a plan showiryg tiye sanitary
sewers in rieed of repair,
NOW, �, B8 IT 1�e0LVED, by the city C�au�cil of the city of �id1eY,
Anoka C�auYty, Minnesata, as follaws:
l. �at the sanitary sew�er reoaROerided for �air by the Public Works
D�ar�nent be r�aired, ar�d the work involved in said iu�rwement
chall hereafter be d�signated as:
c,• � v• •♦ :� , �• •��• . �. ._• a •
2. The plans arid specificatioa�s prepared by the Public Works Depar�t
for such improvemPnt ar�d each of the�n, pursuant to the Cau�cil
actio�n heretofore, are herpby approved arid shall be filed with th�e
City Clerk.
3. �e wr�rk to be perforn�ed w�der SAIa�It7[ � 1t�PAIR PAO►THCT I�U. 221
be performed w�er one ooa�►tY'act.
The Public Works Direct,or shall acoordirygly pr�are ar�d cause to be insert.ed ir►
the official newspaper advertisemer►t for bids upan the making of suc�i
i�rovements urider such approved plans arid specificatio�s. Th�e advertisement
shall be published for tw� (2) w�eeks (at least 10 days), and shall specify tY�e
wurk to be done arid will state that bids will be opex�ed at 11:00 a.m. oai
THURS�AY, � 28, 1991, in the C7au�cil CY�ambers of the City Hall, ar�d that no
bids will be vonsidered unle.ss sealed arid filed with th�e Public Works Dire�.-tor
and aooa�anied by a cash deposit, bid boaxl, or oextified c�ieck payable to the
City of F�idley for five peroei�t (5$) of the amamt of such bid. �at the
advertis�nent for bids for S�Tl'l�t � REPAIR PliO►TDCP I�U. 221 shall be
substantially standard in form.
' �171� i� • �• ' :N• Y:I: M ��'il N� •1- �:1: M •I' ' �� �:� : . �: ��. •I-
I• '.�:
WIIZL�M J. NF.E - 1�Y�2
ATPEST:
n- ►• • w � �• �
,!�� «- i� : u � .i•.c,
:r• ,�yv ;� :�s���+� ��:���-�. ..• . •
s�ea bias wiii be rec�eived ar�d publicly aper�ed by the City of FYidley, Ar�o�
County, Minnesata, at the offioe of the Public Works Director of th�e City of
Fridley, 6431 University Avenue, N.E. , FYidley, Minnesata, 55432, (Z�e1. 571-3450)
on ZSORSL�Y, � 28, 1991, at 11:00 a.m. for the furni �+; m of wnrk ar�d
materials for the follvwiryg work for the City of FYidley SAI�I'1'ARY S�WER REPAIR
PAO►TDCT I�U. 221.
Th�e sanitaYy sew�er pipe repair project coa�sists of water tic�t linir� of 327
lineal feet of 8-inch diameter sanitary sew�+s pipe.
All in avoon�anoe with plans ar�d specificati�s prepared by Jd�ui G. Flora, P.E.,
Public Works Direc.�tor, �idley City Hall, 6431 University Avenu�e N.E., Fridley,
MN, 55432 (Tel. 571-3450).
Plans arid specifications may be e�mined at the offioe of the Public Works
Direc.-tor azrl cx�pies may be obtair�ed for the C�o�tractor's irrlividual use by
applyirig to the Public Works Direc�tor.
Bids must be made on the basis of cash payment for ta�rk, arrd aooa�anied by a
cash deposit, certified cheGk (� a responsible b�nk in the St
ate of Minnesorta) or a biclder's bor�d made payable withaut oor�ditioa� to the City
of E�idley, Mirmesota, in an amaant of r�at less than five peiroent (5�) of the
total amauit of the bid.
The City Cau�cil resezves the right to reject arYy ar�d all bids ar�d to waive arYy
informalities in ariy bids reoeived withazt explanatioaz.
No bid may be withdrawn for a periai of thirty (30) da�rs.
By order of the City Cairicil of the City of �idley, Minnesata.
Dated this 4th day of Marc�, 1991.
Jahn G. Flora, P.E.
PIJHI�C Wt�S D�'P�
Published: FYidley Foc�as donstructiar� Bulletin
Mamh 6, 1991 Mat�c�h 8, 1991
March 13, 1991 Marc31 15, 1991
March 20, 1991 March 22, 1991
• �
�F �lTM •VE
W
�
� „
w
lo�� o Y�RiGO�D T
c •
z
� = an
�
e
W
Y
t
J
W
�
0
�
.
�
W
�
W
>�
!
O
.i;
��
�
_
-
RE
00
M
1� O
W N
W v
t ;
F
� � .
� o
4Y
� �
�
c�rvs
� �1�
L ti�
�iiT
�x0 N
r '
I ` `q
I
����
�
�
�
( �
R�«
�
. �
.
.
.
�
. ��
�1I
�
�
p �.E �..c '
e
0
�
ti m
�i++ � :
`•� I i
� 8,� �
„ OC�[
9
\\ ,____�—__ ,:�� — 3 —
� ��T..p..:.. crt I� �—
_� ,
, rMOE 8�� �� .t I I
�
i
► j tiEGiS T
�
�lC
� r� r w �tY
N
�
/i Q
Gls 8,�
�
-�
ti(..
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �.�i PW91-43
FROM: John G. Flora,�� lic Works Director
Mark A. Winson�sst. Public Works Director
DATE:
SUBJECT: February 27, 1991
Transfer of Funds from Streets Capital
Improvement Fund to Street Improvement
Project No. St. 1990 - 3 for the Extension
Of Oakley Drive
In conjunction with improvements to 67th Avenue as requested by the
Michael Servetus Church, the City agreed to fund the extension of
Oakley Drive and looping the 67th/Oakley watermain. Construction
costs for the street extension and watermain loop were estimated
at $13,000.00.
The entire $13,000.00 was identified in the 1990 Capital
Improvement Program under Water Capital Improvements. It would be
appropriate for the costs for the extension of Oakley Drive to be
assumed by the Streets Capital Improvement Fund. Construction,
advertising, and interest costs bring the total to $6,577.69.
Request that the attached resolution, transferring $6,577.69 from
the Streets Capital Improvements Fund balance to Street Improvement
Project No. ST. 1990 - 3, be adopted so that this project can be
closed.
JGF/MAW/ts
10
�
�
fWDI.EY
�-
�
RE80LIITION NO. - 1991 1 O A
RESOLIITION AUTHORIZIN(i CHANG$S IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR T8E
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FIIND AND AIITHORIZIN(3 TH$ TRANSFER OF
FUNDS FROM TH$ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FtJND, BTREET DIVISION
TO THE 1990 STREET FIIND
WHEREAB, the City Council of the City of Fridley adopted Resolution
No. 40-1990 ordering improvements under the Street Improvement
Project No. ST. 1990 - 3 on June 18, 1990, and
WHERBAB, the extension of Oakley Drive is a portion of Street
Improvement Projerct No. ST. 1990 - 3, and
WBEREAB, the costs for Oakley Drive improvements were inadvertently
identified under the 67th Avenue/Oakley Drive watermain loop
improvement, and
WHEREAB, the funding for the construction, advertising, and
interest should come out of the 1990 Street Capital Improvement
Fund.
NOW, THEREFORE, B$ IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Fridley that the 1990 Budgets of the following funds be amended as
follows:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FIIND
Revenue Adjustments
Fund Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6, 577 . 69
ADpropriation Adjustments
Capital Outlay . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,577.69
BE IF FIIRTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Fridley authorizes the transfer of funds from the Capital
Improvement Fund, Street Division, to the 1990 Street Fund in the
amount of $6,577.69.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY TH$ CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
4TH DAY OF MARCH� 1991.
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �; PW91-42
FROM:
DATE:
SU BJ ECT:
John G. Flora,��µblic Works Director
Mark A. Winsanfa��Asst. Public Works Director
February 27, 1991
Transfer of Funds from Parks Capital
Improvement Fund to the Nature Center
Parking Lot Zmprovements
Improvements to the Springbrook Nature Center parking lot were
completed as a portion of Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990-
3. The budget of $45,000.00 for this improvement was originally
established taking in account construction costs only.
The actual construction cost for the parking lot improvement is
$46,204.40. Overhead costs for advertising and interest have
raised the total for this project by $1,204.40.
Request that the attached resolution, transferring $1,204.40 from
the Parks Capital Improvement Fund balance to the Springbrook
Nature Center parking lot and entrance improvement, be adopted so
that this project can be closed.
JGF/MAW/ts
11
�
'
FW�
RFBOLIITION NO. - 1991 1 1 A
RESOLIITION AIIT80RIZINO CHANG88 IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR TH$
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FIIND AND AIITHORIZINa T8B TRANSFER OF
FIINDS FROM T88 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FIIND� PARR DIVISION
TO T88 1990 STREET FIIND
WHEREAB, the City Council of the City of Fridley adopted Resolution
No. 40-1990 ordering improvements under the Street Improvement
Project No. ST. 1990 - 3 on June 18, 1990, and
WHEREAB, a portion of Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1990 - 3
is the improvements to the Springbrook Nature Center parking lot
and entrance which is estimated at $45,000.00 for the improvement,
and
�iHEREAe, the estimate was based on the cost of construction only,
and
WHEREAB, the additional costs of advertising and interest have
caused the expenditures for this improvement to exceed $45,000.00.
NoW, THEREFORE, HB IT RE80LVED by the City Council of the City of
Fridley that the 1990 Budgets of the following funds be amended as
follows:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FIIND
Revenue Adjustments
Fund Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1, 204.40
Appropriation Adjustments
Capital outlay . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,204.40
BE IF FIIRTHER REBOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Fridley authorizes the transfer of funds from the Capital
Improvement Fund, Parks Division, to the 1990 Street Fund in the
amount of $1,204.40.
PASSED AND ADOpTED BY THE CITY COIINCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
4TH DAY OF MARCB� 1991.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
12
1.
2.
3.
4.
�. ,_ �.- _�r --
: �- : �:�_ • • _
,�, :� -
• " i� ' - -
�itp l�ttornep l�ppoiatment: The law firm of Herrick i Newman
is appointed City Attorney for the City of Fridley.
Term of ths l�qreements March 1, 1991, through December 31,
1992.
�1_ � : - -
��
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Attend all reqular City Council meetinqs. Attend Council
conference Bessions when requested by the City Manaqer.
Attend other meetinqs of City staff at the request of the
City Manaqer.
Advise City staff on legal questions that relate to
official City busineBB.
Advise and attend, upon request of the City Manaqer,
meetinqs of boarde, commissions and committees of the
City of Fridley.
Represent the City at administrative or civil hearinqs
and in courts of law.
Defend City employees, when applicable, in civil suits
arisinq from the performance of official duties.
Prepare reports on Btatus of City litiqation, at the
request of the City Manaqer.
Compensations
A. The City Attorney shall be compensated at the rate of
$85.0o per hour.
B. The City Attorney shall submit an itemized statement that
clearly accounts for the hours of service provided by the
City Attorney.
5. Qther Reimbursementas
A. Expense advances for recordinq of deeds, filinq fees,
charqes for documents, and other expenses related to the
processing of litiqation and property acquisition or sale
shall be subject to reimbursement by the City to its City
Attorney.
12A
B. �►11 leqal service fees for assessment districts and
condemnation proceedinqs are to be charqed against the
appropriate project.
C. All other expenses, such as dues, subscriptions,
telephone publications, eecretarial services and
overhead, etc., associated with the performance of leqal
services shall be the responsibility of the City
Attorney.
Agreed and entered into this lst day of March, 1991.
HBRRIC� i �TB11MA�1
Law Firm,
BY
Virqil C. Herrick
Its
CITY OP FRIDLEY, l[INNE80TA
A Municipal Corporation,
BY
William J. Nee
Mayor
BY
William W. Burns
City Manager
1
i