The URL can be used to link to this page

08/12/1991 - 5106OFFICIlkL CITY COONCIL ]ltiENDA . COt3�TCIL l�BETIN�i AII4tTBT is, 1991 , � � '� �,, GTYOF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING ATTENDENCE SHEET Mon c�ay , Augus: t 12 , 19 91 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ITEM PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER � � .�Tj '� %,.5�.�--c� _ �.,f �i� _7 _ 1L1� i ,y�vZ�w� Z.�'OZ �C9ws(JC �Jl� 1'�l� �F1lfa4A�ZC7�.�r,$)li � � � k" �'� ��,-� N I ti��s gn�. 1Jn• ►� � s�� `i ro3 �% � ��CJ' � �C � 1 � l c �C i �Gl 1� i �� . i � � / _ FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL �p�� llIIQIIBT 12 , 19 91 PLBDG$ OF ALL$GIANCE: �1PPROVAL OF MINIITEB: City Council Meeting of July 22, 1991 �iDOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORIIM, VISITORB: (Consideration of items not on agenda - 15 minutes) POBLIC HEARING: Vacation, SAV #91-03, by William Pickering, to Vacate the Southerly 20 Feet of the Northerly 40 Feet of a Drainage and Utility Easement Located in Lot 11, Block 2, Innsbruck North, Generally Located at 1467 North Innsbruck Drive N.E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1K NEW BOi�-NE88: Resolution in Support of a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Application for Exemptio.z from Lawful Gambling License to Totino-Grace High School . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2B �K1�LJSY L1Ti CC1UrC1L l�S�llH� oF �U�US1 1Z � 1991 Paqe Z NEW HIISINE88 (CONTINIIED): Resolution in Support of an Application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Bingo Hall License for the Knights of Columbus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3C Resolution in Support of the Establishment of a Multi- Jurisdictional Senior Citizens Center Task Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4E First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 2.03.07 of the Fridley City Charter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5A First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Section 2.05 of the , Fridley City Charter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6B First R 3ding of an Ordinance Under Section 12.07 of the City Charter ta Vacate Streets and Alleys and to Amend Appendix C of the C�ty Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7C pDTf1T_4V f�T/nV nAft1?ATT_ 1f441*ITV/1 ne ffi�ReT 19 •ee� ��..s �s � • � � � � � 7 � � N8W BIISINE88 (CONTINIIED): Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of July 13, 1991: . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8Z A. Establish Public Iiearing for Auqust 26, 1991, for a Rezoning, ZOA #91-01, by Mark Kvalheim of Bailey Enterprises, Inc., to Rezone from R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General Business, on Lot 17, Block 5, and the South 7.3 Feet of Lot 16, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition, Generally Located at 203 - 205 Mississippi Street N.E. ........... 8- 8F ........... 8G - 8Z Receive an Item from the Appeals Commission Meeting of July 9, 1991: . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9N A. Variance Request, VAR #91-19, by Randall Olchefske of Riverside Auto Wash, Inc., to Reduce the Required Front Yard Setback from 35 Feet to 10 Feet, to Allow the Extension and Enclosure of a Canopy on Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 19, the Same Being 6520 East River Road N.E. Approval of House Trailer Application for Fridley Convalescent Home located at 7590 Lyric Lane N. E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - lOF lA1LL�ii L:11I b-VUL�I�:1L 1�bb1119� Vir AN{7�Jii1 1L� 17/`J1 raqe �{ � ` 1 . • �1 �1�. � Approval of Comprehensive Sign Plan for Insurance Mart located at 6875 Highway 65 N. E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11B Receive Bids for Skywood Lane Water Extension Project No. 220 . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12C Receive Petition and Authorize Removal of "No Parking Between 6 P.M. to 8 P.M." Signs on the West Side of Jefferson Street (SSOG - 5300) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13C Receive Request to Rice Creek , Watershed District for Financial Assistance in Funding a Rip-Rap Pro�ect A1ong a Sharp Curve in Rice Creek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14D Approval of Community Development Block Grant Program Agreement Between Anoka County and the City of Fridley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 15B �K1DL�Y Clli CoU�CiL JISSTiH� OF �U�UST lZ. 1991 NEW BIIBINE88 (COI�ITINti$D) s Appraval of Amendment to the 1991 Anoka County Solid Waste Joint Powers Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16C Approval of Memorandum of Understanding with the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (1rII�iFA) to Participate in the Rental Rehabilitation Program for 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 - 17R Resolution to Receive $25,000 in 1991-1992 Coon Rapids Community Block Grant Funds and Pledging to Return Those Funds in 1992-1993 Fridley Community Development Block Grant Funds or Other Monies . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 18 - �8B Resolution Ordering Improvement, Approval of Plans and Ordering Advertisement for Bids: Springbrook Nature Center Landscaping Project 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 - 19B �., pQTT1T.�V f�TTV nfliilJnTT. 1fp4TTVfS AQ 1R/SiiaT 1 9 � oA� ��.�.. t - -- ------- --i �__ ��7� � NEW BIIBINE88 (CONTINQBD): Resolution Amending the Repayment Schedule of a Loan to the Fridley Historical Society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 - 20B Informal Status Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 - 23C Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 ADJOQRN: T8B MINOT88 OF TH8 FRIDLBY CITY COII�CIL 1L8BTI�t� OF ' JIILY 22, 1991 TH$ MIN[JTES OF T8E REGIILAR MEETING OF THE FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL OF JIILY 22, 1991 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:32 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Councilmembers and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Billings, Councilman Schneider, and Councilman Fitzpatrick MEMBERS ABSENT: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, JULY 1. 1991: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: MS. MARY VASECKA 6909 HICKORY DRIVE - RE: LOCKE LAKE: Ms. Vasecka stated that she understood the preliminary report has been submitted regarding Locke Lake. She also requested the use of City equipment for mowing. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that he understands there is a preliminary plan; however, it has not been distributed. He stated that he has heard this report will be submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District at their next meeting, and once it is received it will be distributed. He stated that as far as the mowing, he would check into this further. Ms. Vasecka stated that if there is anything the property owners should be doing to let them know. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22, 1991 PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS• 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON A VACATION, SAV #91-01. BY EUGENE AND JEAN HAGBERG, TO VACATE THE 12 FOOT ALLEY IN BLOCK 23. HYDE PARK. FOR A DISTANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 243 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF 59TH AVENUE. GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF 58TH AVENUE1, SOUTH OF 59TH AVENUE. EAST OF 2ND STREET. AND WEST OF 2-1f2 STREET• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 7:39 p.m. Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a request to vacate the north 243 feet of a 12 foot alley located north of 58th Avenue, south of 59th Avenue, east of 2nd Street and west of 2-1/2 Street. She stated that the vacation is requested by the property owners as they have experienced a lot of nuisances such as parking and illegal dumping in the alley. Ms. Dacy stated that the purpose of an alley is to provide access for vehicles, utilities, and emergency vehicles. She stated that all the properties in this block, except for Mr. Measner's property, have access to abutting streets. She stated that a utility easement could be retained, and that the Police and Fire Departments did not need access from the alley for emergency purposes. She stated that the main issue is vehicular access. Ms. Dacy stated that the main purpose for vacating the alley is for the alley to be under the ownership of adjacent property owners and to eliminate the nuisances they have been experiencing. She stated that in Mr. Measner's case there would not be 100 percent guaranteed access. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission explored two options. She stated that one option was to determine if Mr. Measner could obtain a permanent easement from the property owners at 5851 2nd Street or 5846 2-1/2 Street. She stated that the property owners were not in favor of this option. Ms. Dacy stated that another option was the creation of a driveway from 2-1/2 Street to Mr. Measner's home. Ms. Dacy stated that when 2-1/2 Street was improved a curb cut was not allowed for this property. She stated that she understands it is not possible to build a tuck-under garage, and that the only possibility for construction of a garage is to the rear of Mr. Measner's home. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22 1991 PAGE 3 Ms. Dacy stated the Assessor's Office has noted that the property would decline in value if the alley is vacated, as it removes an option for access to Mr. Measner's property. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of this vacation request. Councilman Billings asked how Mr. Measner now accesses his property. Mr. Measner stated that he drives through the alley both from the north and from the south. Councilman Billings asked if the north portion of the alley were vacated, how would this impact Mr. Measner's ability to get in and out of his back yard. Mr. Measner stated that there is not enough turning width without pulling onto the north half of the alley. Councilman Billings asked if only the north 213 feet, instead of the north 243 feet, were vacated if this would give Mr. Measner the extra space he needed. Mr. Measner stated that he would then only have access from the south. Councilman Billings stated that he drove through the alley and that it is not very open from the south. He stated that to exit to the north he had to drive through tree branches. He stated that it looked like the ruts were almost non-existent on the north end of the alley. Mr. Measner stated that he is trying to keep the access to the north at a minimum because the property owners do not like it. Councilman Billings asked Mr. Measner if he was primarily using the south portion of the alley for access. Mr. Measner answered in the af f irmative . Ms. Jean Hagberg, 5881 2nd Street, stated that it seems this vacation is based on whether Mr. Measner is going to have access to his property if he cannot park his vehicle in the front of his home. She stated that it seems the only way he is guaranteed access is if the City maintains the alley, as there is no way a snowplow can get in the alley in the winter. Ms. Hagberg stated that if the owner of the apartment building construc�o ert enc She stated thatathe only other access is to allow of his p p Y him to park in his front yard. I FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22, 1991 PAGE 4 Councilman Billings asked if the City plows alleys in the City. Mr. Flora stated that only if the alley is surfaced. He stated that the City only has about nine miles of surfaced alleys, and those were installed due to petitions from the property owners. Councilman Billings stated that the question is if the City can require Mr. Measner to park in the front yard, if a curb cut is provided, and if access is taken in the back, is the City liable. Mr. Gregg Herrick, representing the City Attorney's Office, stated that if the City restricts the ability of the property owner to utilize the back yard, it will reduce the value of the property so an argument cauld be made on Mr. Measner's behalf that the Council's action has affected his property value. He stated that he understands the only location for a garage is in the back yard, and if access is not alZowed to the area it would prohibit Mr. Measner from constructing a garage. Ms. Dacy stated that the issue is Mr. Measner's ability to access a garage if one was constructed. Ms. Hagberg stated that in order for Mr. Measner to access his property he has to back onto part of the property on whieh the apartment building is located. She stated that there isn't room to construct a garage in the back and be able to get in and out. Mayor Nee asked the width of the lot, and Mr. Measner stated it was 40 feet. Councilman Billings stated that if the north half of the a11ey were vacated, and Mr. Measner used the south portion for access, it would mean the property owners to the south could never vacate the south half of the alley. Ms. Hagberg stated that she talked to the owners of the apartments, and it was stated that they would not request a vacation because they would not have a place to stack their snow. Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if Mr. Measner was using the south portion of the alley for access in the winter. Mr. Measner stated that he just moved to his home in February. Ms. Cheryl Williamette, 6004 2-1/2 Street, stated that she was the previous owner of Mr. Measner's home. She stated that in the winter they shoveled and then used the south half of the alley for access. She stated that the alley has overgrown a lot since she lived there and felt that to improve the alley would be best for everyone. She stated that the alley was really all the access they had to the property. Ms. Williamette stated that a curb cut was not allowed when the street was improved because they actually had FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22 1991 PAGE 5 to provide access to a garage, and also that parking in the yard was not allowed. Mr. Reider, 5875 2nd Street, stated that he has a legal concern about someone getting hurt in the alley and who would be liable. He stated that he did not want to be held accountable for a"paper" alley. He stated that the property owners wished to stop the traffic in the alley and have some privacy. He stated that he has lived in his home for three years, and the alley is not maintained by anyone. Mr. Reider felt that if the apartment owners wanted to vacate the south end they would have attended these meetings on the vacation request. He stated that he felt the six property owners to the north would not be in favor of improvements because they did not want to pay higher taxes. Mr. Reider stated that if Mr. Measner was provided with off-street parking and access from the south half of the alley he would have two accesses. He stated that vacation of the north half of the alley would make him responsible for this property, and he could fence it or leave it open in order to make it safe. Councilman Billings stated that the entire alley could not be vacated because it denies Mr. Measner access to his backyard, and the only other choice is to improve the alley and assess those costs to the property owners. Councilman Schneider asked what prompted the property owners to request the vacation of this alley. Mr. Reider stated that the alley was not being used by any drive through traffic, but teenagers are using the alley and disposing of their trash. He stated that the only way to alleviate some of the problems is to vacate the alley. Ms. Judy Konsela, 5828 2-1/2 Street, stated that she has lived here for eight years, and there has always been traffic in the alley. She stated that if Mr. Measner is allowed to park in his front yard, it would block her view in the front of her home and decrease the value of her property. She stated that there is vehicular traffic, motor bikes, bikes, and pedestrians using the alley. Ms. Becky Street, 5825 2nd Street, she stated that there are woods behind her home and a lot of partying. She stated that there is apartment traffic through her yard, and when the snow was plowed at the apartment building it was plowed into her yard, causing her to lose several trees. She stated that her concern is where the snow would be placed if the alley is vacated. She stated that the major problem seems to be the disturbances and felt these will be shifted from the north to the south if the north half of the alley is vacated. She stated that if the alley is improved she would be assessed and, as a single homeowner, she could not afford this expense. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JULY 22, 1991 PAGE 6 Ms. Eileen Reider, 5875 2nd Street, stated that she had been cleaning the alley but has not done so the last several weeks. She invited the Councilmembers to come and look at the alley. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 8:27 p.m. 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.05 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER: MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 8:30 p.m. Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that the Charter Commission is proposing an amendment to Chapter 2.05 of the City Charter relating to the manner in which vacancies on the Council that occur between elections are filled. He stated that, basically, the amendment divides vacancies into two classes; those which occur within the first three years of a term and those which occur in the fourth year of a term. He stated that there is another division regarding one, two, or three simultaneous vacancies and four or more simultaneous vacancies. Mr. Hunt stated that there is a problem with the present wording of the Charter. It states that if there are four or more vacancies the remaining members shall, by unanimous vote, raise the Council up to four. He stated that there is some question on whether that is possible if there were four simultaneous vacancies because at most there would only be one remaining member, not members. Mr. Hunt stated that since this language was written, the terms of office of the Council have changed from three to four years. He stated the Charter Commission is proposing that if there is a vacancy in the first three years of a term, the remaining members of the Council would call a special election. He stated that if a vacancy occurred in the fourth year of the term, the Council would have the option of appointment. He stated that if the vacancy is within 45 days of a General Election, then the Council could exercise only the option of appointment. Mr. Hunt stated that the purpose is to give the Council more flexibility in a year in which an election occurs. He stated that if there are four or more vacancies, the City Manager would call for an election and fill all terms. Mr. Backlund, Chairman of the Charter Commission, stated that this proposed amendment has been discussed at length at the Charter Commission meetings in order to make provisions for the worst FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING O� JULY 22, 1991 PAGE 7 possible scenario. He stated that Mr. Ed Hamernik, who is the past Chairman of the Charter Commission, was more instrumental in working on these amendments. Councilman Schneider stated that this area has certainly needed some work. He questioned why there was an option for appointment in the fourth year rather than a special election. Mr. Hamernik stated that the appointment option leaves the Council with same flexibility. He stated that when a vacancy occurs in the first three years of a term it was felt there should be a special election because the public would be better served. He stated that the option for appointment was left to the Council for a vacancy occurring in the fourth year of a term. He stated that if the Council wished to have a special election this could be done, but the individual that is elected or appointed would serve less than a year. Councilman Schneider stated he agrees with this argument that the public is served better by an elected official but wondered why this was not true in the fourth year. Mr. Hamernik stated that if a vacancy occurred in the fourth year of a term there would be an election for that office in November, and the time period would not be that great from when an appointment was made until the election. He stated that it was left to the Council's discretion if they wanted to appoint a person or call an election. Councilman Schneider felt that an appointed position does not serve the public as well and questioned whether there may be an incumbency advantage. Mr. Backlund stated that the overriding decision on why the appointment option was considered was the cost for holding a special election when one would be held that same year. Councilman Schneider stated that he felt the cost of the election seemed a minor impact when considering appoint versus elected officials. Ms. Pat Faner, representing the League of Women Voters, stated that some correspondence was sent to Mr. Hunt regarding this issue. She stated that the proposed amendments make no provision of the possibility of vacancies of two or three Councilmembers. She stated that the present Charter does address this issue. She stated that, as it stands, two or three members could appoint two councilmembers if the vacancy were to occur after January 1 of the faurth year of the term. Ms. Faner stated that it is suggested to avoid this problem that an additional paragraph be added to read as follows: "If the FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22, 1991 PAGE 8 membership of the City Council is reduced to less than four members, but more than one, the Council shall call a special election after the manner provided in Section 2.05." Ms. Faner stated that the League also had a question about a vacancy accurring within 45 days of the General Election. She stated that if such a vacancy occurs after the filing period has closed there would have been no filing by interested candidates. She questioned if the appointed councilmember would obtain the position for the full four-year term. She stated that someone could be appointed for the balance of the short term, which would be something less than one year to fill out the current vacancy, and then on January 1 of the following year, a new four year term would begin. She stated that the League was concerned about artificial creation of a vacancy. Ms. Faner stated that regarding the filing period for a special election defined in Section 2.05, the League felt this should be ten consecutive days rather than five days in order to allow adequate publication time. She stated that the followinq wording is suggested: "The Council shall designate a period of ten consecutive days after the thirty day period following declaration of the vacancy for the purpose of filing nomination petitions in accordance with Section 4.06." Mr. Hunt stated there is nothing that restricts the Council from designating a longer period for filing. Councilman Schneider asked if it would be a problem to change this wording to ten days, rather than five days. Mr. Hamernik stated that he did not have any problem if the Council wished to make this change. Mr. Betzold, a member of the Charter Commission, stated that he initiated the discussion with the Charter Commission and felt the plan authored by Ed Hamernik was very good. He stated that he was not present when the vote was taken on this proposed amendment and, as he reviews the needs, he felt there was still more work that needed to be done. Mr. Betzold stated that whenever there is a vacancy on the Council, and when it happens unexpectedly, there are a lot of competing interests. He felt that the Council should act as quickly as possible to fill the vacancy. He stated the original Charter provided that the Council could appoint someone to fill that vacancy until the next election. He stated that in 1978, the Charter was changed, and if there was a vacancy, it must be filled by a special election between 45 and 60 days. He stated that if there is a vacancy in the first year of a term and numerous people file for the office, the winner could be someone with only 30 percent of the vote serving for almost four years. He felt that FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22. 1991 PAGB 9 primaries should be held which goes back to the question if the Council should make appointments. Mr. Betzold stated that there probably should be certain situations where an interim appointment could be made if that person was not interested in running for office. He felt that this was an issue that needed to be debated. Mr. Betzold stated that a vacancy in the second year raises some issues. He stated that the present Charter requires an election in 45 to 60 days, and it would seem to make sense to try and have the special election with the regular election rather than be tied into some 45 to 60 day period. Mr. Betzold stated that a vacancy in the fourth year is dealt with in the amendment and felt there should be debate on what should be done. He stated that the term is coming to an end and only a few months are left, but he questioned if it would be discouraging to the candidate to campaign when the election is only several months away. He stated that there should probably be a process to deal with this issue. Mr. Betzold stated that the present Charter states the President Pro Tem acts as the Mayor in his absence but does not address the issue if the office is actually vacant. He stated that both Blaine and Spring Lake Park experienced some problems in this area. He felt that the President Pro Tem covers temporary absences but did not address the issue if the office is vacant. Mayor Nee stated that this proposed amendment was approved by all Charter Commission members that were present when the vote was taken. He questioned if it would be better to take another look at the amendment. Mr. Backlund felt that it was not wise to take action if something needed to be reworked. He stated that Mr. Betzold has expressed some concerns, as well as Ms. Faner of the League of Women Voters. He stated that he had no objection to discussing these issues. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she wished to thank the Charter Commission members for all their work, but felt there were some concerns that were raised that should be addressed. Councilman Billings stated that any time the membership of the Council is reduced to less than two members, the City Manager would call the special election. He questioned why the City Manager would call for the election if there was even one member left on the Council. He asked who makes policy decisions for the City during the sixty day period and, if only one person remained on the Council, if this person could make legal decisions. � FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22, 1991 PAGE 10 Mr. Backlund stated that he did not believe one person could make these decisions. He stated that he would suspect the City Manager would carry on the normal affairs of the City short of making a policy change. Councilman Billings stated that the current Charter specifies that if the membership of the Council falls below four, the Council shall appoint up to four members. He stated that the current wording is certainly in need of change and appreciated what the Charter Commission was undertaking. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:12 p.m. 3. PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.03.07 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing opened at 9:13 p.m. Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that the original Charter adopted in 1957 provided that if there was a disparity in the wards they should be redistricted as equally as possible by popu2ation and area. He stated that in 1983 the Charter was amended to require that the wards vary by no more than one percent. Mr. Hunt stated that the State and, to some e�ctent, Federal law seem to have two issues when dealing with redistricting; the one person, one vote rule, and the fact that the voting districts should be fairly easily to discern. He stated that in 1982 the Council redistricted the area according to the 1980 census. He stated that at that time, the City's population was 30,214, or an average population of 10,071 per ward. He stated that the greatest deviation was .17 percent. Mr. Hunt stated that the Charter Commission voted to expand the variation in the wards from a one to three percent deviation. He stated that the idea is to still preserve very close the one person, one vote ideal, but allow for greater flexibility in the legislative district lines or other boundaries. He stated that the most recent census shows a population for Fridley of 28,335 which would mean an average ward population of 9,445. Mr. Hunt then reviewed the maximum possible differences between wards with a one, two, and three percent deviation. Councilman Billings stated he believed that due to the construction of Springbrook Apartments, the maximum deviation is approximately FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME�TING OF JIILY 22. 1991 PAGB 11 488 persons more than the median average of the three wards. He stated that the three percent deviation may allow the figures to be close to what exists now. Mayor Nee stated that the question is how much flexibility was needed and to determine the percentage of deviation. Mr. Backlund stated that this proposed amendment did not receive a unanimous vote by the Charter Commission but passed significantly. He stated that the negative reaction by the Commission was that this change is being made without really knowing the numbers. He stated it was also felt that there is the one percent guideline now existing in the Charter. Ms. Pat Faner, representing the League of Women Voters, stated that it was found the State allowed a deviation of two percent. She stated that in reviewing the population figure of 28,335 or an average of 9,445 per ward, a three percent deviation could run as high as 564 persons from one ward to another. She stated that the League felt this was unnecessarily large if the concept of equal representation wanted to be maintained. She stated that the League would recommend a two percent deviation. Mr. Backlund stated that during the Charter Commission's discussion, it was noted that the State law requires a five percent deviation between Legislative districts, and the Charter Commission felt this was too loose. Councilman Billings stated that he attended a conference today regarding redistricting, that many of the rules are not clear at this point, and the State law apparently has contradictory provisions. He stated that the issue is further complicated by the Governor's veto of the redistricting bill. Councilman Billings stated that another issue brought out at the conference was that the State is working on new computer software, and this software will work best if all precincts and wards follow the census tract blocks. He felt that the Council should probably take this informatian into consideration. Mr. Betzold, a member of the Charter Commission, stated that another issue facing the City was the requirement that polling places had to be physically in the district. He stated that there is a new law on the books stating a polling place can be 3,000 feet out of the precinct. He stated that the census is not a precise number. He stated that these figures will also be several years old before they are implemented. He stated that he would opt for understandable boundaries rather than a mathematical survey. He stated that he would like equal representation as much as possible. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JOLY 22. 1991 PAGE 12 Councilman Billings stated that he understood the requirement to allow a polling place 3,000 feet out of a ward was vetoed so he does not know where it now stands. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 9:39 p.m. Mayor Nee thanked the members of the Charter Commission for their work on this proposed amendment. OLD BUSTNESS• 4. ORDINANCE NO. 974. AN INTERIM ORDINANCE PLACING A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL USE PERMITS FOR AUTO BODY REPAIR BUSINESSES AND PROHIBITING THEIR LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY WHILE THE MORATORIUM IS IN EFFECT: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the second reading of Ordinance No. 974 and adopt it on the second reading and order publication. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS• 5. RENEWAL OF ANIMAL CONTROL CONTRACT WITH SKYLINE VETERINARY �IOSPITAL: MOTION by Councilman Billings to authorize renewal of the animal control contact with Skyline Veterinary Hospital from August 1, 1991 through July 31, 1992 and request the appropriate City officials sign the contract. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 26, 1991• A. SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR AUGUST 12 , 1991. ON A REQUEST FOR A VACATION, SAV #91-03, BY WILLIAM PICKERING, TO VACATE THE SOUTHERLY 20 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 40 FEET OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED IN LOT 11. BLOCK 2, INNSBRUCK NORTH GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1467 NORTH INNSBRUCK DRIVE N.E.: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set the public hearing on this vacation request for August 12, 1991. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22, 1991 PAGB 13 B. RESOLU ION NO. 55-1991 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY QF FRIDLEY AND RECIPIENTS OF 1991 FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR HUMAN SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS• Mr. Barg, Planning Assistant, stated that the Human Resources Commission reviewed the requests for the Community Development Block Grant Funds. He stated that thirteen applications were received, and the Commission recommended funding which totaled $38,835. Mr. Barg stated that the Planning Commission reviewed the recommendations of the Human Resources Commission and did not make any changes. He stated that the application from the North Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped for $1,000 was recommended for approval contingent upon the execution of a contract between this organization and the Fridley School District setting forth the terms for provision of these services. He stated that the City has received a copy of an agreement to this effect which has been signed by both parties. Mr. Barg stated that it is requested the Council consider adopting this resolution in order that agreements may be entered into with the agencies receiving funding. Ms. Sue Jackson, Vice-Chairman of the Human Resources Commission, stated that all agencies applying for this funding had to meet the requirements of the Federal Disability Act. She stated that there are some new agencies and programs which have not been funded in the past. She stated that the goal is to get programs off the ground rather than to be their sole support. Councilman Billings referred to the $1,347 to the Fridley School District for the summer adventure program and asked if this was the same program the City's Recreation Department was funding. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that it is not the same program as the program sponsored by the City. Ms. Jackson stated this program is an enrichment program that addresses the needs of students and children. She stated that the funds will be used to pay the fees for the classes if there are students who cannot afford this program such as those from lower income families. She stated that certified teachers and specialists are involved with the program. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 55-1991. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of June 26, 1991. Seconded by FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22, 1991 PAGE 14 Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 10. 1991• A. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #91-08, BY LEWIS AND VELMA FARR, TO ALLOW A THIRD ACCESSORY BUILDING. OVER 240 S UARE FEET. ON LOT 10 BLOCK 1 RIVER EDGE ADDITiON GENERALLY LOCATED AT 157 RIVER EDGE WAY N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a request for a special use permit to allow a third accessory building over 240 square feet at 157 River Edge Way. She stated that located on the site is the petitioner's single family home and an attached one car garage. She stated that in 1984 a special use permit was granted for a second accessory structure. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this special use permit by a 4 to 1 vote with two stipulations, which she outlined. MoTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation of the Flanning Commission and grant Special Use Permit, SP �91-08, with the following stipulations: (1) variance request, VAR #91-18, shall be approved; and (2) the structure be located within two feet of the location shown on the plan. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 10, 1991. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. RECEIVE ITEMS FROM THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 25, 1991: A. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #91-16, BY TAMARA AND CHARLES THOMES TO REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM TO FEET TO 6 FEET TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION ON LOT 14 BLOCK 1 AMBER OAKS. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5985 MCKINLEY STREET N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that the petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the side yard setback from 10 to 6 feet to expand the living area above his garage. She stated that staff recommended denial; however, the Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance request. She stated that the Commission felt this was a unique situation since the proposed addition was above the garage, there was still li feet of space between this structure, and the neighboring property to the west. FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL MSETING OF JIILY 22. 1991 PAG$ 15 Councilman Schneider was concerned if this was encroaching into the side yard and if there are code requirements for a fire wall. He wanted to make sure that the Building Department was aware of this encroachment. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the unanimous recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant Variance Request, VAR #91-16. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. B. VARIANCE REOUEST. VAR #91-17. BY SAMIR AWAIJANE. TO ELIMINATE THE RE4UIREMENT FOR A SIX INCH CONCRETE CURB IN THE AUTOMOTYVE STORAGE AREA: TO REDUCE THE HARD SURFACE SETBACR FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM 20 FEET TO 10 FEET, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7570 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that Mr. Awaijane is not present at the meeting; therefore, the Council may wish to table this item. MoTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the City staff's recommendation and deny both Variance Requests under VAR #91-17. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. C. VARIANCE REQUEST. VAR #91-18, BY LEWIS AND �7ELMA FARR, TO INCREASE THE TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ALL ACCESSORY BUILDINGS FROM 1,400 S4UARE FEET TO 1.832 S UARE FEET, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL GARAGE SPACE, ON LOT 10, BLOCK 1, RIV�R EDGE ADDITION, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 157 RIVER EDGE WAY N.E.• MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to grant Variance Request, VAR #91-18, with the following stipulations: (1) the proposed accessory structure shall not be attached to the dwelling unit unless it has frost footings; and (2) the petitioner shall provide a hard surface driveway by August l, 1992. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. RESOLUTION NO. 56-1991 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION LOT SPLIT L.S. #84-13. TO SPLIT OFF THE SOUTHERLY 36 FEET OF LOT 5� BLOCK 5 MELODY MANOR TO ALLOW A DOUBLE BUNGALOW TO BE SOLD INDIVIDUALLY, THE SAME BEING 7396-98 SYMPHONY STREET N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that on January 7, 1985, the Council approved a lot split for this property to allow a zero lot line for a duplex/double bungalow at 7396-98 Symphony Street, with three stipulations. She stated that the petitioner at that time, Randy Anderson, did not follow through FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22, 1991 PAGE 16 with a survey and sold the property in its entirely to the current owner, Mark Akbari. Ms. Dacy stated that at the end of May, Mr. Akbari was attempting to convey one-half of this unit and property to another person; however, staff would not authorize the deed for recording since the stipulations of the lot split approval were not completed. Ms. Dacy stated that Mr. Akbari has submitted a certificate of survey and compliance with the lot split code requirements, and the legal descriptions match the lot split approved in 1985. She requested that Council consider this resolution to allow the lot split with the stipulation that a$750.00 park fee be paid and submission to the City of a declaration of covenants for the property. Councilman Billings stated that six years have lapsed and wondered if another fee should be collected. Ms. Dacy stated that the vote in 1985 was unanimous, there were no questions or comments from the public, and the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the lot split. MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 56-1991. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. AUTHORIZATION TO TURN BACK 1987-1989 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize $11.69 in unused 1987-1989 Community Development Block Grant Funds to be turned back to Anoka County. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1991 - 1& 2• Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that on the 73rd Avenue street widening project there was some poor soil which had to be removed to provide a suitable base for the street. He stated that it is requested that Council approve this change order to cover these costs. MOTION by Councilman Billings to authorize Change Order No. 1, Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1991 - 1& 2, with W.B. Miller, Inc. in the amount of $6,904.00. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22. 1991 PAGE 17 12. RESOLUTION NO. 57-1991 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING AN AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING WORKING CONDITIONS. WAGES AND HOURS OF EMPLOYEES OF �HE CITY OF FRIDLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR THE YEAR 1991• Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that this contract provides for a four percent increase over 1990 and involves a change in the structure of the Fire Department. He stated that previously, there have been two full-time firefighters on the night shift and one on the day shift. He stated that this would now change to two on the day shift and one on the night shift. He stated that the purpose of this change is to more fully utilize the talents of the f iref ighters and provide greater coverage during the day. MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 57-1991. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. RESOLUTION NO 58-1991 ENCOURAGING THE FRIDLEY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO DECERTIFY PORTIONS OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS THAT ARE NOT NEEDED FOR FINANCING OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the word "fund" was inadvertently omitted from the fourth paragraph, line three, and should be inserted before the word "publicly." MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 58-1991. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Councilman Billings stated that the intent of this resolution is the result of discussions he had with Mr. Prairie several years ago. He stated to show that tax increment financing was working, portions of those districts that are not needed for financing economic development or redevelopment improvements should be decertified. He felt that the public's perception of tax increment financing was better if the districts can be decertified as soon as they are not needed. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there were no informal status reports. 15. CLAIMS• MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claims No. 38357 through 38694. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a FRIDLEY CITY COUNCI_L_MEETING OF JIILY 22. 1991 PAGE 18 voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. LICENSES: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 17. ESTIMATES; MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as submitted: Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attorney for the Month of June, 1991 ....$ 8,688.00 Chemlawn Commercial Services 1156 East Highway 36 Maplewood, MN 55109 Corridor Maintenance Project No. 217 Estimate No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3, 686.47 HNTB 6700 France Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55435 Inspection of the 1.5 MG Elevated Water Reservoir Project No. 202 Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,691.01 W.B. Miller, Inc. 16765 Nutria Street Ramsey, MN 55303 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1991 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18, 414 . 28 Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COiTNCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22, 1991 PAGE 19 ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of July 22, 1991 adjourned at 10:16 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: % _ � Community Development Department G DIVISION City of Fridley --_�___ .,, ____ � William Burns, City Manager�Ao` Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Public Hearing for Vacation Request, SAV #91- 03, by William Pickering for 1467 North Innsbruck Drive N.E. Attached is the above-referenced staff report. The City Council set August 12, 1991 as the date for the public hearing. Staff recommends that the City Council hold the public hearing. � � C�N �F fRIDLEY REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCATION SiTE DATA SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LANO USES & ZONING ��$ PARK DEDICATION STAFF REPQRT APPEALS DATE PLAIV�NNG �SSION DATE: June 26, 1991 CffY COl�1CIL DATE : Juiy 22, �99 � ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPIJCATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WtTH ADJACENT USES 8� ZON6VG ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNlNG COMMISSlON RECOMMENDATION � �� MM/dn SAV 4�91-03 Bill Pickering To vacate the south 20 feet of a drainage and utility easement. Lot 11, Block 2, Innsbruck North; 1467 Innsbruck Drive N.E. 15,730 square feet R-1, Single Family Dwelling R-1, Single Family Dwelling to the north, south, east, and west Approval Approval SAV 4191-03 n 1 � � r�! _ ++i ia.aca S//2 SEC. 24, T. 30, R. 24 C/TY OF FR/OLEY 1 ��' .. , '� - '� ,: E � � � . , � �� •� K A�Jf.+ S( W i��' � �'�T M �� !__ ',�� q! , �.._ O .' T �wr. N , �_' � A9. '.7 T U�o) .OT /O, `S ~ S �' .—MK1MS +; —,er.:_ . — =_ — _ '_,i, ,. ,o P�.. C�U f : �i}�p� � � :� _,� __ �6 . .:, • 1 —i , 1 � �:t f_ .`�rJ Q _. -� . "__ � �7 '� .. � " �-� nT�l f�i�" �� (-�- - .._ 34 26 �B 43 ��I''�' I �- � •i ,�^, r� l � � ..� .� ;�° �ti K p �� _ Y , i � ' °�_� � � )e : _` `,: r� '�C. _"t LOCATION MAP Staff Report SAV #91-03, Bill Pickering Page 2 Request The vacation request is to vacate the south 20 feet of a 40 foot drainage and utility easement on Lot 11, Block 2, Innsbruck North, the same being 1467 Innsbruck Drive N.E. S ite Located on the property is a single attached two car garage. In the back encroaches into the drainage easement by zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are Analysis family dwelling with an yard, an in-ground pool 10 feet. The property is the adjacent properties. The drainage and utility easement was dedicated on the Innsbruck North plat. The contractor originally proposed to locate the pool out of the 40 foot drainage easement (see attached survey); however, the pool was constructed encroaching into the easement by 10 feet. The encroachment was discovered when an asbuilt survey was completed at the time the house was sold. The subject parcel is located at an elevation higher than the surrounding properties, resulting in water draining off the subject parcel into lower areas, to collect in a wetland/pond area west of the parcel. The petitioner is requesting that 20 feet of the drainage and utility easement be vacated. In reviewing the request, the Engineering Department indicated that it would be better to vacate as little of the easement as possible (15 feet) to ensure adequate work room within the easement area, should the Engineering Department need to perform any work within the drainage area. Vacating the portion where the pool is located would have a minimal impact on the storage capacity of the drainage area, and as it is at a higher elevation, would have little impact on the flow of water within the drainage area. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City � Council approval of the vacation, to vacate the south 15 feet of the drainage easement. The smaller portion is based on the Engineering Department's recommendation. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. The Planning Commission minutes erroneously indicate vacating the south 20 feet. At the July 24, 1991 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission moved to correct the minutes to 15 feet. 1D Staff Report SAV #91-03, Bill Pickering Page 3 City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission action. 1E . � �� w ,..._ SAV #91-03 Bill Pickering e r � �y,.. i oL !-vy 1r,• j tR! ( %� ils Plat Drawing Is not IntendAd to be used es a aurvay and shouid not be rsllad upon a8 such. Tho lot � ms ara taken irom the recorded plat or iho county records and are a�sumed to be cor�ect. The toaatlor provements $hown on thls drewinp are approximate and are b�s�d upon a visual lnspectlon of the prer Ilcensed surveyo� should be contacted ii an �ccurale survey ls deetred. Ti��s plaf drawing doea nol coc tabitity of tho company and Is intended for use by the company only, s' L��- �' 3V . .- . .; ., 'r. � . ��' qSZ= : `� :... � ��a'.. ,,%�.if�- : . . , �,� � . ��;: . ': . �,., ►,. � ,�.,�b : � : ��', 7 . Ya :,►.� �� / . :.o. � ,,1• lQ ;.� .,. � 1 �� .��N .� t !�< : i� � ' t �K � { �'abi � /f� / : � �M ~y ,� �: �,, • * �� . .,u; �G �' 4 L � � ��. 8 . . i ��'i� r`G�J�'-. �1' * �� '`� , : a �/ � i . . � � � / •N1 G ry � �� 9�4�� . . � �r�,��t �: !�a �� i ti. �' /b �/ : �'� _. ��r � Q�, . � `'c . 1�t�' •3'f}NjJ.. . . � � �1� t � .r q�.: i !,t�c � 1 t� 3.� � b~� (. �" ��T 1F � �% �3� _ � � h� � ��`�E �v � � �� a r-x.�k��.t- �- u�� l � �y ��c. fc�u.ti�' N �[5�.. �� , p �rea— -�o b� �c�.r.a_�-�e-d - SITE PLAN � ' I.. � . /. �� i �� 1 V �{; � _ �, � � Y. ��,�� r:� � • ��i 3��"h ' / �' J�":,� . "� ' "c/ s . `�t .� r � �t� � �A'� ' �v. `v �' �-ir•. . i "� S /� � �� ''r t V � 1� � '�J fi+' y�.�� \ y . ; � "' i" r � �:_ i� : �,1 SAV ��91-03 n_„ l�-hCl LLL � ' r'b,1V ;; � ` ,�` . ` �ry^r / ;,p ` � ,;y , �� f . ` � .RJ� • T�+ • ..1 � --�- . _. . . � ` �• Cv �' JA:� y w, \. '.� •� l`• ��'y�{iQ�` �1 . 1� '.Si:F• �� U Y -1:r`�� j �; . �� _ ��" - "��' .,� N N� . '�' �� V Z � � '�' �J ti j � � `,� ' N , , iA ' : � n- � U • � . � �. (� . ! � 'V `� � � �_ dI j 1` .. ;� � /l, - �� .Ca �N S ,�I1 � � j ' � - . ��I O _ j v �.! � . o. .: ; • ^ � a `' � J � �`' �; oza r �` i a y .�• :-, I �:� ;�- ;. �: � �:� �,, �, E, " 3 � • � � , �� .� •�) Q� i • ��D� p l`V �. . O �-� � `+ _ -a �. 1. p�'�t � �• � o� �a , ` �,• "'' j � o . :,?) i � � \ `_ ' soi � ' �� a - ! O ��i` � � � µ � � � � , , L' I i ' �� ` ^il M � `-', ' — [1'E{�1- � ''; ,q 1 � �. �' a '.. � �'' `l `' , ° � �," °_�, � Y.'i' � . ��, � Q O �\ t ,v t' x� � (�i. � T � 1 � , ,ly !ff � �, L.E•�Z � : , .., �% ��{� �- �� _� � -� I �� t� � [ e- F • ,. � y �+ I x � � ( � z � . S �iz F ` .�?/ �1 � � i � j � � � ,`�/ � �" \��2 � , . � �,, �. -1 �a�- �:I � yc �\� � , � •\\ � . �. � „ r .� � ° � �, .��'^ `' '•+ ,� . / . b ^� f .s c/��' , � � � r � � • • ' � • � � 4 \M "� . � � 1 � ' F��F � I � r ��,e I� �� ► .l. � • C(�'! • Z � Y � � � � �� 1 ''Y �' ��'x �. i ' I ? y N K `q V' � � . J� n � '"� ,_��,"" _'"�:+ . � !. , � N � \ p � `` �t/� • .�i�.'. � �' . � � • . ,•' I . .� 'j �r .3_ , V � �� \ Q t �� . � a �� 2'.SF� \��l N � 4q i o� Ma _ � . : • __�.. ' � ;�::i �F� � .�, �� o �,��f.•fz.�l .:�� is a__ vJ ; ; , .s�� ,-�--�...----�--W --�•---- oi� -i .. � :', • � , �,a� � � � I ``' -'I_ I ' i � �~. � d r-----' 000�l � . % � i � � � ' � l�i�`�a�� 9 � � I1 - � � °r .�- �, . ,•� . ' 4�/ • ( • • JD �-•_ � j u' � �� at � �1i . I �: ' `.� � � Q' �j ��^. � � i Q �P .rji' ••!: 1, '� � �I �. � \ 1 �v b , t � �i 3 �n �t•�•� , �j' J V a7' ."�, ! �� .r ,� �► � '�;.; � t-� � i '0 r' � ^,� � � P `.�� r.l � � . t'� �'. !. �.+ `'Y i �7l t� �r :r :d Irf �7� � � ''� �•# Jod , ,� � =�s � � ` ' � oi: GI LI ,_ � ` � � � J a � f � ' ��Y� _----^� � SF.1 - s � �, p °'LL. � �}I S.t'` L � . —fb' � ? ' _�� _� _ - � '` i � _./ . c:�� (,f'l�� t � r y. �� J � �- � � � � �1 • � . 1G SITE PLAN 6ERALD T. COYNE 300 BRUNSWICK AVE. S. GOIDEN V/�LLEY, MINN. MINN. REG. NO. 4741 INDUSTRI/�L — JUDICIAL COMMERCI�I — TOPOGRAPHICAI CITY LOTS — PU�TTING ii::ZP��N �i��iE ; /�-��,�; .� \ �, � f -�. , �:--�. ;._- •� _ , � �' � Bill P1CkRAYM�NO A. PRASCH L4T SURVEYS COMPANY 6917 IDAHO ,,�E. �:. BROOKLYN PARK, M1tv�J. LAND SUR�'El'ORS MINN. REG. NO. 67a3 KEGISTEXED UNDER LAWS OF STATE OF Af[N1�650TA LICF,NSED BY ORDINANCE OF CITY OF MINIvF.APOLIS INVOICE NO. 1� � C;� 5747 W. Broadwey 533-9922 6 B. NO, i4 �— i� Minneepolis, Mi�neaota 55428 � r� ♦ " SCALE 1" = . v - �LII'UP1JAr8 �PI'�tfiCFlfP O — DENOTES IRON � /� ; • �� . , 'Y' ,� i �, :�` � � � r� -- ��. i.ariv li � ��..{ :�. ._ � -�.......`�~.�i'.,n_ �;^1;7�fii1 We hereby certify thet this is e true end co�rect representet�on oF e survey of the boundarias of the ebove -dexribed lond and the locetion of ell bufldingz and visibla encroachments, if eny, f►om or on said (end. S1griEC� Surveyed by us this I-'�dey of ']�'�i[•E?T�)?.`' 19 ♦u ..■ � ' .1 �.80 Pooi permit drawing `., r- -1 __ r ? �" ' "` � 1 ) ' � /�^ �," \ '` _/ � i ...1 . � � •1 Y '� l `� � .. ,�<: ,t ,� �t' �f+ � .:. r/rt`��'� ! � LO SURVEYS COMPANY �, -: - QTY � r�mTFv 6431 IA�V�SITY AVEN�TE N.E. FRIDIEY, � 55432 -~�(612) 571-3450 �. � y� �ii •. n n� �� ' �=1L= �.� u a� �_c_� _ K�n a� `TAt'ATI�1 APPf,.ICAZ�I�1 I�10Qtl+i giarJPF�t'Y II�o�,TIOt�T - site plan' r+equired for sul�nittals: see attac�Led �S= 1467 Innsbruck Drive �Jorth. Fridie,�,' MN .F: .. . � .. . . Iegal descr'iptial: ' Innsbruck North Lot 11. Block 2 , Lo�t 11 B1ocJc �� 2 Tract,/Additior� Iegal d�esariptio� of easen�xit to be vacated:'Easements-for drainage & utility purposes,'over the'Norther�y��40 feet, Westerly, Southerly•:& Easterly 10 feet as shown on the recorded ulat. °�� .; .° ` ' � r ,: � g , �.�' C'�rrent zoazir�cJ: � R-1 � �re g��a�qe � - ��•s Rea.sari for vacations 10 feet of swimning pool located in easement needs vacation: � � ; : ..�„ : _ . ` to,�obtaan Title Insurance �Pool is'10"feet hi her than holdin ond & all t' ities ` �� are ocated in street in front of home. �, � Please Vacate the southerly 20 ft of the northerly 40 ft of easenen (Oontract Purchasersz Fee Owners mu.st sign this form prior to pra�essing) �1ME Mearl & Barbara A. Crosser � ADL�SS 1467 Innsbruck Drive North _ - Fridley. MN = nAYTII� P� _ 537-2688 SI(�ZURE � /` �2�.� �. ( �,�}q/.LPlt� DATE _ __ � �] 5 j 91 ..�_.... __ P�,'TITI��2 II��OI�TIO�T : �ME Wi�liam A. Pickering ADD�2ESS 2407 Mounds Avenue Briqhton, MN 55112 DAY'�� PHONE 574-2000 ext 230 szc�� ilJ,� VU,,�Q�:.- i� - i � n� S -- ( .� - `�.� Fee: $150.00 Ppxmit SAV # �L(.-'(i�? �?eoePit # %�j} v� % 7 Application Y�eoeived by: Sc�eduled Planning Oaa�eai.s.sioa� date: �D I 7i�.P I 1 � Sc�eduled City C3ow�cil date: _.,..,... �.... �... �.,.... �.,..,..,, ��;� � . � . . Y ��-� � � . . not vacated." Whether the alley is va ted or not, there are going to be consequences. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconde y Ms. Modig, to approve the June 19, 1991, Planning Commiss' minutes as clarified. IIPON A VOICL VOTE� ALL VOTING AYB, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. l. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION SAV #91-03 BY WILLIAM PICKERING• To vacate the southerly 20 feet of the northerly 40 feet of a drainage and utility easement located in Lot 11, Block 2, Innsbruck North, generally located at 1467 North Innsbruck Drive N.E. Ms. McPherson stated the subject parcel is located in the Innsbruck neighborhood. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all other surrounding properties. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed request is to vacate the south 20 feet of the 40 foot drainage and utility easement which runs parallel to the rear lot line of the subject parcel. The was originally dedicated on the plat. The reason for the request is that the in-ground pool encroaches into the easement by approximately 10 feet. At the time the proposed to be constructed, the contractor did propose pool be built outside the easement, but for some reason, was built in the easement. She stated that Mr. Pickerin� as the agent for the homeowner, has proposed to vacate i 20 feet. easement vacation drainage pool was that the the pool �, acting :he south Ms. McPherson stated the drainage for the area flows north of the pool and then west. Staff requested that the Engineering Department to review this request. The Engineering Department has asked that as little of the easement as possible be vacated to ensure that there is adequate room to work if regrading of this drainage area needs to occur within the easement area. Ms. McPherson stated that vacating the portion where the pool is located would have minimal impact on the entire drai.nage area as the pool area sits much higher than the surrounding drainage area and would have little impact on the storage capability or the flow of water. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the vacation to vacate the south 15 feet instead of the requested 20 feet of the drainage easement. The smaller portion is based on the Engineering Department's recommendation. 1J PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 26, 1991 PAGE 3 Mr. Pickering stated the water all drains to the north, and the homes to the north are 6-7 feet below the pool. He had no problem with the vacation of 15 feet rather than 20 feet. MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to recommend to City Council approval of vacation request, SAV #91-03, by William Pickering, to vacate the southerly 20 feet of the northerly 40 feet of a drainage and utility easement located in Lot 11, Block 2, Innsbruck North, generally located at 1467 Innsbruck Drive N.E. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRILD IINANIMOIISLY. Ms. McPherson stated that at their July 22 meeting, the City Council will set a public hearing and probably the first reading for August 12, 1991. 2. ECEIVE JUNE 6 19 RESOURCES COMMISS ON M NU MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to receiv the June 6, 1991, Human Resources Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON B ZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOIISLY. 1991-92 CDBG Human Service Fundinq Recommenda ons Ms. Sherek stated the Planning Commission must act on the Human Resources Commission's recommendations r CDBG funding for the July 22, 1991, City Council meeting. Ms. Sherek stated the only fundin request with any kind of controversy is the request from No h Suburban Consumer Advocates for the Handicapped (NSCAH). Thi year NSCAH is requesting $1,000 to create a disability awaren s curriculum within the public schools at the 4th grade level. The Commission stipulated that the funding should be contingen upon a contract between NSCAH and School District #14, and th's written contract should be included in the recommendations to ity Council. If there is no contract with the School District the $1,000 will be divided between ACCAP (Senior Outreach Worke and SACA. MOTION by Ms. Shere , seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to concur with the Human Resources C ission to recommend the following CDBG Human Service funding �r 1991-92: Ale ndra House • AC AP (Senior Outreach Worker) �A c of Anoka County Central Center for Family Resources Community Emergency Assistance Program Fridley School District (G.E.D.) Fridley School District (Summer Adventure) 1K $4,000 5,100 2,000 3,400 2,000 2,500 1,347 CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R A N D II M n � AILLIAM W. BIIRNS CITY MANAGER .' � TO: , � FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: MINNESOTA LAAFIIL GAMBLING APPLICATION FOR EBEMPTION FROM LAWFUI+ GAMBLING FOR TOTINO—GRACE HIGH SCHOOL DATE: JQLY 31� 1991 The attached resolution approves the application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License for Totino-Grace High School. The Totino-Grace High School will be holding a raffle on November 23, 1991. Minnesota State Statutes requires a resolution approving or denying any type of gambling of permit. The application has been approved by the James P. Hill, Public Safety Director. 2 RESOLIITION NO. - 1991 RESOLIITION IN SIIPPORT OF A MINNESOTA LAWFIIL GAMBLING APPLICATION FOR EBEMPTION FROM LAWFIIL GAMBLING LICENBE TO TOTINO-GRACE HIGH SCHOOL WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has been served with a copy of a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License for Totino-Grace Hiqh School; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has not found any reason to restrict the location for the charitable gambling operation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley approves the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License for Totino-Grace High 8chool for a raffle to be held November 23, 1991. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1991. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 2A FOR BOARD USE ONLY FEE CHK LG22o Minnesota Lawful GambIing INIT DATE `R�"�"""�°' Application for Egemption from � Lawful Gambling License Fil! in ihe unshaded porYions of this application for exemption and send it in at least 45 days betore your gambling activity la procaessing. Brother Milton Barker, FS�C�612 �571�9116 Thomas Zellmer �612 �566-3185 Attach proof of nonprofit status which shows Check the box below which indicates your type of organization that your organization is nonprofit ❑ Fraternal O Religious ❑ Veterans �] Other non-profit �j IRS designation O Certi�cation of good standirg from the Minnesota Secretary of State's oifice � Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization (chart�) Totino-Grace High School C-�ymnas�iu� Street City-------- --------Township 1350 Gardena Ave NE Fri�dl ev�, MN Date(s) of acdvity Game Bingo ❑ Raffles �1 Paddlewheels O I declare all information submitted to the Gambling Control Division is true, accurate, R State Zp aode MN 55432 I have received a copy of this application. This application will be reviewed by the Gambling Control Division and wilt become effec6ve 30 days from the date of receipt by the city or county, unless the local govemment passes a resolution to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resoludon must be received by the Gambling Control Division within 30 days of the date filled in below. Cibes of the first class have 60 days in which to disallow the activity. City or County Townshlp Cfity or county name � Township name l � "l , '; _,' ; �,, � l 1 �.-4 `--_/ �. i. ! �- �_ ? . c ± J± ignaty� of p� rson receiving applica6on I, > � ,.c2 �.,: /� � ,� �c <</i� -(��C, ;_ �'c l ( ' 1.�� :� �:a-�a RNt - -Oryanii�tlm Vellow •-Boud rsYms b dgeriaEOn to oompl� sheded are�c fwM •-• Ciry a Couny Signature of person reoeiving application f' �'i' `// � Mail with $25 permit fee and copy of proof of nonprofit status to: qepartment of Gaming - Gambling Control Division Rosewood P outh, 3rd Fbor 1711 W�ty Road B Roseville. MN 55113 received TO: FROM: CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R A N D II M ��. AILLIAM A. BURNS, CITY MANAGER �, RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING BINGO HALL LICENSE FOR THE RNIGHTS OF COLUMBII3 HALL DATE: AIIGIIST 8, 1991 Attached is a resolution approving the application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Bingo Hall License for the Knights of Columbus Hall at 6831 Highway No. 65. The Public Safety Director, James P. Hill, has approved the Bingo Hall License. The Minnesota State Statutes requires the adoption of a resolution approving or denying any type of gambling of permit. 3 RESOLUTION NO. - 1991 RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A MINN880TA LAWFOL GAMBLING BINGO HALL LICENSE FOR THE RNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has been served with a copy of an Application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Bingo Hall Liaense for the Rnights of Columbus; and WHEREAS, the location of the Binqo Hall is the Ruiqhts of Columbus, 6831 Highway 65 Northeast; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has not found any reason to restrict the location for the Bingo Hall License operation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Fridley approves the Minnesota Lawful Bingo Hall License to the Rnights of Columbus. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1991. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 3A LG300 (Rev. 10/30/90) Minnesota Lawfui Gambiing Bingo Hall� License Application - {See instructions (or completion of this application) Is this application for a new license, or a renewal? ❑ New � Renewal FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Fee Oate Chk I�itiai Lice�se # Part 1 YNIGHTS �F COLUMBUS (612)571-1492 � Anoka Street address o( hall �— City or Township whe�e hall is bcated State Zie code 6831 Hy#65 Fridley MN 55432 2. Mailing address of bingo hall Ci �831 Hy#65 ' . ry �Fridley Ml�`� �'��2 3._ Is ttie bi�go hall located within city limits? Yes [� No 0� I( •No,' i�d'�cate township in which bingo hall is located g. name o� iegai owner ot dingo hall property - hone • North Air Home Assn �12� 571-1492 Business Ma�ling Address Ci State de 6831 Hy#65 ' Fridryley MN 55Z�'�� 5. Names ot at! ow�ers, officers, directors, partners, managers and superviso�s (each person named must fill out a separate Bingo Hall Personnel Inionnation fortn, LC315 and Affidavit, LG316) � b. � - k. �'Jerry Lafaber Secy. h' m. d�Vern Lambert � 4� . i' �. e. � - o 6. �� Sole proprietorship �_] Partnership �� Corporation f::..r..T}�f�..:.y...,J,��,it .�y «•'.'t:MyY�2/�:?�`.t`Y;-i.��+{:yti}��;4�Ni�S'°�°`� . �+ C • �o � ��1� {�+�st��s�A7��\v.''P. � � i...Y?¢r,4 .... . '�'•..;;r�•<: r,��} �ta { ?.� x . . . ` �m �:::t.::�..:•>:=...'i.o:::,i;.`•:.>:::ti::5:•:::�a:-:::�i`•`.,_:,:s;>?.�'{w;v''\w.. ry,��„�•, �•.:;,��`��At :!L..hax ' ...a.?o,,, fii.• .t :`•- '~.cn . • ::� +-. •: P# 1:.. \• � .� � �vn. J �;�,}i .?.�'�v'�i>v , �i.'v. h \ � t�'v .A i jv �., . • . . . . u7a....•f.._.. r.,:�.s�.ra:h:•. .. ..:..:...,.�r � .'r.'. .: .:..'• ' ..L. :�. ..,•»�J. . . �h7..:% v>. 7. Have/do any persons listed in items 4 and 5: . Yes No a. been convicted of a felo�y? b. ever been convicted of a crime involving gambling? . c. ever held a bingo hall license previously i� Minnesota? d. owe delinquent taxes in excess of $500 as detined in Minnesota Statutes section 270.72? e. ever been convicted of assault, criminal violation involving the use of a ii�earm, or making terroristic threats? f. after demand, not filed tax returns required by lhe Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue? 8. Are any oi the individuals listed in items 4 or 5, or a person holding a financial or managerial interest in the bingo hall, or afiiliate ihereof -- • a licensed dislributo� or afiiliate of the distributor undet section 349.161? • a licensed manufacturer o� affiliate of the manutacture� unde� sedio� 349.163? • -,;1 ��fl�l'1tn (i! a. v.:�l'�!c � :l� r)i^I�;I��It�r �.( al,-r,l:��l:� ►•n;r^r�rnc? � - � a r� � � o a � � � � � � a � r� n Minnesota Lawfui Gamblirtg Bingo Hall License Application (LG300) - Part 2 v4�. u �u�4;u.x .�,e,.?y �xr • 4 w. su .. v:{:�.}}•(n: nx•t:: • :?f{r y .f� v •x.}+' f�h "l.ir:.wi:�;�;�{n;m;:.ay;::::.}iai+ .. R:.;��}�;v,.v,:v�.}i:Y:?'Y.•?"rY.%'v.t :;.y:o::rg�: ../{ f.{{:.,vryi_S:w,v^-.v �.. v': x++-.ii� i ::',�."'.�r. ... Q v -02..� ...t .. .:.f�::�:::ti:%: n.Q.h viG:v :?i'e`.`-:itu=:i"�'•�a�: �i.': r..s.. ...>...3?Y"•:M.::" ,..;:?#,...,�:' .I.` . J..t. :iA-.�:::•ri::i:.,v: `:.3... v:4.•}s:•-:�::::n}:.0....�.:,••: . r....::..;.... ..>.�......�c�... s,:+r.�:.:-::;: ,7... ::�:i:�:;•.o ,<.. ..c,..;:,_�::%v. 'v:`�t:v::'..:•:•:>:•k.a...•........t.;:�.,�..::. : `�.,.,;.,:. •..:. : .,..........:::�::::: .. $• -y},.:�;: 6 .0 4'v:i$;n�+;: • v, � . �} ' �; vT�.:.y, };}: }�:..... } . �'S ' 'r'F. . A \ ��i."di\^:i'4i. }... ?v ji �nv.s;... :v:\:�ii:L' ' v�'t:'v'•$.�� . h h . .i4: H . .i•.}iiiiiii •} j... z.. r.;�. • ;?,.:�':.c.tav$ . .�}.,9 '.'9F2<, rr, .i.,•,.*�.::•_.,::••:..,,�'��..,.r.r.•.•.•`.• ::}ia��.�'•:c�•:.. ..s,::>; .2j.�{`>i::=�:?:i:.k;...... :a;x.:.:;..:„:f.;,>•., ;..J•�,,..,. t).. ry� ,.v•h: •'<:�', 'N�t�.;'•ti;.•�t,.y,. 9 :;dc2�r..�.,,.,•;�r••:£••.::;�`�;?:..$.. h. r,::;:..<;;<o::`a:wt:�::�....si . . �.fic.{s.\�,'�,•:o;:�',<•.,•`,.f., ..,. { �`,;%i:;5,r;:::_::: �a�.i��$• ,3 �,v,:3::,,? :2? •. •: . ?.�:: f:k ?�t. �b .> .. � ' � a . ,.;{•:t•:::..us.:.; .;`��.;r �cY., `?% .,iS,•`<?:�::�.. .?C?•.::.. .>,J�n..�::.��#n2c;;i.,t�t�'�':�b°',ccC•t;:::n: iF3=•`•> r,r::t?..�.. . � Y� Jk�.��.. ,c•:c •k• 2•-� •:.:... :�. r.•. .,..�f•:::::::�::::�,...•:: . n . ... I declare that this application is correct and complete to the best o/ my knowledge and belie(. 1 wi/1 fami/iarize mysel/ with lhe laws o! the state o/ Minnesota and ru/es of the Board regarding gambling and agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, inc/uding amendmants !o them. Changes in the in/ormalion submitted in this application wil/ be submitted lo the Boa�d and local govemment unit within ten days alter the change oacurs. 9. Signature of chief execu6ve officer o( the lessor Date Name (please ptint) Title � � _ �/�/�/ ,��/,� /a. L�LriC°,r/f�KD � l�i�['S. �� 10. Name of person compleEing this torm Tide Phone .� �r�i,� � . ��A� . �,��s. �� > >�P �3 y� }�tt<;�� < a &�yt�. . S�# �� . f � .�..i, $ �f t� f � ..< fjx�it_y<,a, �': �� o. � . erx ��+�i.� f� c�``�. �,�`,q 1. The city' must sign if the bingo hall is located within city limits. 2. The county " AND township" must sign if the bingo hall is bcated within a township. . 3. The local government (aty or county) must pass a resoluCwn specifically approving or denying the application. 4. A copy of the resolution approving the application must be attached to the application, . 5. An applicatbn which is denied by the local governing body should not be submitted to the Gambli�g Control Division. Cit�" or Caunty'k 11. Ciry or county name �� Sig�atur o(, erson receiving appli 6on �— ;�7i�'!iL C� - C�- Title Date eceived ��.� � - �- � Name oi person delivering appGca6on to local govemment ,�2v�,v � . G�cn,�� TOWI1Shlp By signature below, the township adcnowledges that the otganizaGon is applying ior a bingo hall license within township limits. Township`* 12. Township name Signature of person receiving application Tide - Township official Date received Is township? organized uno�ganized unincorporated � � � i+.nso-w:!.af`s::�?�.,..«.yr; �<"".,�^.�'.'Cd��• >!£` 1>itKc'ai"'•fi �!'""""�. �S'c�n' +�"t;` '+tq"•?uY�"SL?s:r•a�<y„, . y„ .. t. r,.,.. .. , .., " . y�-�( {�.... �y §�y• /��y �/y� ,,y i p �,t �t�t��y.� ti ' .3 . .::?.��: : �' ��G ' ��1a�iit'tIt'�JFS+.I:� l `� k sa ,..:� 1I��S'4��{1(i '�>��','�.li�4l�'i�/ � �y h�+'{C '?��+.+}i?h`�WYA4}}i::::�:�:rh{vH:CfAr}ri• : $ If.OPl:<:9• . 4} �Y.4 XJi{O'l.�k S.�C{�fi t. /.. • Form LG300, Bingo Hall License Application, Parts 1 and 2 • Form LG302, Bingo Hall Occasion List • Form LG315, Bingo Ha�l Personnel Information (for each person listed in item d and 5 on form LG300) • Form LG316, Bingo Hall ANidavit, (for each person listed in item 4 and 5 on iorm LG300) • Chedc for license fee ot $2,500, made payable to "Sfate of Mlnnesota" sv::.�....;,�;;.,..;..;;:,,.;;�,�,,;;h:Q.s;`7..•:>. �+:r�:;;•��:.:a..?;,,,n....��.; ..k.,....�,.;,,. .�.:�.;...,,,.,:n....,\Y��\'�.J4Y.VVJ'C\VC'�. \:r:�Tl\��\N:\V} .w:C:O.�.p..;...yw :..?ix< - .?� .�`av.... ; . .. i?,.;�?.. �.. �;?;. . ,:.h,`�;�.� .`T�.��.i. . .:.. . . . .x.... Y.':... . ..... ;>.>2;.,, --,;..�..;.;:y, . >x>... ...\..,: , _, ..:,.......-... . :•.:..• � :...► ..: '� •: .o• :.::._. , , .i.::: �-.�.:;: •- �t•�..,•:: •ar:r;��v:•..-:.,•:�:: ..•' ...•hS..<..:r...:•..•..•::;:�>:: .,r �:::}`�� :•::k...: ".':,•:::.:... ..ti,;:;�:::=::•"::�'., . . . -.: ' • :. ...::::. . :. .t f.; .,:. : . :.; � • : :.� . � .;. . . . - . : � -. . : : ' a:Cwr::;:::}�•,:�.:;;.ti.;....:):::::::S.t.,;;•i;<;:;...z;.:<•:.�:.wC.,,c;. :..^.;.}..::•::x:5<:�:: �� . .�:.<tc� �'u.� �. ��:e:.�, .�r�t�t:��.n �A = � ��`�� ='` .?�:�... ..... ..... �..: ��ti�:i��€�.i`��:�s.�. «. , . .x.:.K ,...:...:..::: t�.....��....'�:........:r...:... h.n.n...: . �. : ,. v . . ......4\\\'ti.in�;•;i:�'�;`L�>y:.3:?ti�tiv:iti�•..'ti•%.:iSSvv;�{p\:ih'L•��y'v'•:•.'•.2....y��!:•�v i ; ' .xv:i:. .• .::••+ri::^"j"".�.•intiwi:i:?:•i::v:.vv:}:.ti•:::'"':�n.v. ..... v::>-..v::::n.�av}:�.v:.vihv.t::4:4vh:A..lv::titi.•.�+n'v.v�'�Lti•i:% ::::n...... .........x.....:T:i:.w:::........... ..... _.... �..w.: .;} :................ \v...v�. rt..::: hv..::::: riih......... � ...n.........�....... .....v..:..r ............:...... Departmenf of Gaming Gambling Cont�ol Division Rosewood Plaza South, 3�d Floor 1711 W.County Road B Roseville, MN 55113 3C RESOLIITION NO. - 1991 RESOLIITION IN BIIPPORT OF THE EBTABI,ISHMENT OF A MIILTI-JIIRISDICTIONAL BENIOR CITIZENS CENTER TASR FORCE WHEREAS, representatives from the cities of Fridley, New Brighton, Mounds View and Spring Lake Park have been studying issues related to the establishment of a regional senior center since February, 1991; and WHEREAS, a preliminary staff report indicates that higher quality and more diversified senior services may be achievable through a regional approach than through the efforts of any one city; and WHEREAS, it is important that senior citizens and other community interests have an opportunity to evaluate a regional approach to establishing senior citizen services; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fridley supports the establishment of a regional senior citizens center task force that will be charged with the responsibilities identified in Exhibit A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fridley will appoint eight of its citizens to represent the City of Fridley on the twenty-one member senior center task force. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Fridley authorizes the City Manager to work with members of staff from the other three communities in support of the work of the Senior Center Task Force. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1991. ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 0 WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR CHARGE FOR REGIONAL SEIVIOR CITIZENS CENTER TASK FORCE The City Councils of Fridley, New Brighton, Mounds View, and Spring Lake Park, in the interest of exploring the possbility of establishing a regional semor center, have established a twenty-one (21) member Regional Senior Center Task Force (hereinafter referred to as the "Task Force"). The Task Force shall consist of eight representatives from Fridley, six representatives from New Brighton, four representatives from Mounds View, and three representatives from Spring Lake Park. The City Councils of the four cities have agreed that in appointing members to the Task Force, consideration shall be given to representation of various groups and interests including: senior citizens, business community, local elected of�cials, ather governmental agencies, senior service providers, local elected officials, and other organizations. The responsibilities of the Task Force are as follows: 1. Organizational: A. The twenty-one members of the Task Force shall meet on or before September 6, 1991. Thereafter, the group shall meet at least biweekly. A quorum shall consist of eleven members who represent each of the four cities. B. At its initial meeting on September 6, 1991, tlte Task Force shall seiect a chairman, a vice chairman, a secretary, and four ofher members to serve on an executive committee. i. The chairman of the Task Force shall be responsible for serving as chair person of the meetings. He/she shall create a meeting agenda for each of the task force meetings, and shall provide for the assignment of responsibilities associated with the work of the task force. ii. The vice chairman of the Task Force shall serve as chairman in the absence of the chairman. iii. The secretary of the Task Force shall take minutes of ineetings. The minutes do not need to be verbatim, but should address the general direction of the meeting, and should account for decisions that the Task Force has made. C. The executive committee of the Task Force shall consist of the chairman, vice chairman, secretary, and four other members representing each of the four communities. It shall meet under circumstances agreed to by the full membership of the Task Force. D. The Task Force will be expected to have completed a preliminary report and preliminary recommendations by December l, 1991. The final report is e�cpected by February 15, 1991. EXPfiBIT A 2. Threshold Decision: A. Representatives of the four communities that represent on the twenty- one member Task Force shall address the basic issue of whether or not there should be a regional senior center that will serve the communities of Fridley, New Brighton, Mounds View, and Spring Lake Park. B. The Task Force shall address the advantages and disadvantages of a regional senior center and the composition of the proposed service area. 3. If the Task Force decides that a regional senior center should be built to serve the four communities, the Task Force should address each of the following issue areas: A. Programs and Services: i. The Task Force shall proceed to identify programs and services that are desirable or should be provided at the proposed regional senior center. ii. The Task Force shall also comment on the levels of service, and develop justification for these services. B. The Facilitv: i. The Task Force shall develop recommendations regarding the proposed senior center facility. Attention shall be given to exterior unprovements, interior space allocation, and equipmen� C. Site Selection: i. The Task Force shall develop site selection criteria, organize a site selection process, and make recommendations regarding site selection priorities. The final list of site priorities should be justified on the basis of the site selection criteria. D. Statiing and Operating., Costs: i. The Task Force shall develop recommendations regarding staffing and identify all operating costs associated with providing the desired level of senior services. The costs shall be organized by the following categories: a. Personal services; b. Supplies; 2 ,� � c. Contractual services; d. Capital outlay; and, e. Debt service. E. �iunding: i. Sources of funding: a. The Task Force shall develop recommendations regarding funding for the proposed senior center and shall address the following questions: 1. To what extent shall the regional senior eenter be funded through general purpose tax dollars (e.g. properiy taxes)? 2. To what extent shall the regional senior center be funded by seniors? 3. What funding might be available through service contracts or direct assistance from other governmental units (Metropolitan Council, State of Minnesota, Ramsey and Anoka counties, and the school districts)? 4. To what extent shall a regional senior center reasonably e�rpect to profit from rental income? 5. To what extent might the regional senior center benefit from private sector foundation funding? ii. Allocation: a. How should a portion of the regional senior center costs that are funded through general purpose tax dollars be allocated among the four communities? F. Inter-governmental Issues: i. As the Task Force defines service responsibilities for the proposed senior center, it shall also determine the e�ctent to which these services are currently provided by other governmental or nongovernmental agencies in the four communities. It will also make recommendations regarding the consolidation and/or coordination oiservices currently provided by both private and public sector agencies. 3 4C ii. T7ie Task Force shall also calculate the extent to which the regional senior center will be dependent upon school districts, counties, and other agencies for direct or pass-through funding. iii. The Task Force shall prepare an analysis of potential problems or issues that will result from dependence on the cooperation of the counties and school districts. iv. Finally, the Task Force shall recommend solutions for inter- governmental or inter-agency problems or issues that they have identified. G. Legal Authoritv: i. The Task Force shall determine whether or not a regional senior center shall be established under the authority of a special district, a joint powers agreement, or some other arrangement that may be mutually agreeable to the four cities. ii. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach shall be addressed, and recommendations developed regarding the most appropriate or advantageous form of legal authority to be used. iii. The Task Force shall also develop recommendations regarding the steps that should be taken to implement the legal organization of the regional senior center. H. Governance: i. Whether a special district or joint powers agreement is established, a regional senior center will no doubt need a governing board. ii. The Task Force shall address the major facets for organizing a governing board, which shall include: a. Size of the board; b. Allocation of seats among the four cities; c. Selection of board members; and, d. Term of board members. iii. The Task Force shall also make any recommendations it may have regarding appointment of an advisory committee(s) to the board. 4 �� I. Timing and Scheduling: i. As the Task Force concludes it work, it shall give attenYion to recommendations regarding the tuning and scheduling of the steps necessary to implement its recommendations. Attention should be given to completion of research assignments, meeting with State legislators, land acquisition, selection of an architect and/or project manager, construction of the proposed regional senior center, recruitment and selection of regional senior center staff members, and a target date for the commencement of regional senior center operations. 4. The Preliminary Stati Report: Each of the Task Force members has been given a copy of the preliminary staff report that was presented to members of the four city councils on July 10, 1991. As the Task Force begins its work, we would like to explain that the issues, research and recommendations contained in the.report are preliminary and in no way are meant to restrict or bind the work of the Task Force. S. 5taff Support: The four city managers/administrators of the four cities, or their designees, are to be considered ex officio members of the Task Force. They may participate in the discussions of the Task Force; but may not vote on issues that are before the Task Force. They may, on their own initiative or at the request of the Task Force, invite other representatives of the staffs of the four cities to attend the Task Force meetings as non-voting participants. Although the Task Force may choose to independently research the issues raised in the Task Force meetings, we expect that the staffs of the four cities will provide the research support necessary to conduct the work of the Task Force. Requests for staff support should be directed to the city managers/administrators of the four cities. Thanks• The City Councils of the four cities wish to thank the members of the Task Force for their commitment to service. We genuinely seek your input, and look forward to the product which your group will provide. S � MEMORANDUM - Municipal Center '_ 6431 University Avenue Northeast VVllli�l C. H11I1t Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Assistant to the City Manager U-�ypF (612) 572-35Q7 f��-� FAX: (612) 571-� 287 Memo To: �iilliam W. Burns, City Manaqer ��` � From: William C. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manaqer ��/ Subjeat: Ordinance Amendinq Section 2.03.0? of the Fridiey City charter Date: July 25, 1991 At their meeting of July 22, 1991 the Fridley City Council held a public hearing regarding an ordinance amending Section 2.03.07 of the Fridley City Charter. This section of the Charter relates to the amount of deviation allowed between wards upon redistricting. The amendment would change the allowed deviation from one percent to three percent of the average ward's population. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 410.12, Subdivision 7 the amendment now goes to the Fridley City Council for acceptance or rejection. There is no provision for amendment of the amendment by the City Council. Accardingly, I request that you present this amendment to the Fridley City Council for its consideration at the August 12, 1991 meeting. WCHjjb ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.03.07 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: That the following section of the Fridley City Charter be amended as follows: Section 2.03.07 7. The boundaries of the three (3) wards shall be redetermined from time to time by ordinance duly adapted by the Council, and based on the findings of the Council that the wards so redetermined are such that the population of any ward shall not deviate by more than e�e three percent (� 3�) from the average of the three (3) wards. (Ref. Ord. 776) PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1991. SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 5A WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR MEMORANDUM _ Municipal Center '_ 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 G1ypf (612) 572-3507 ��-� FAX: (612) 571-1287 William C. Hunt Assistant to the City Manager , Memo To: William W. Burns, City ManaqerA�` 11� From: William C. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manaqer� �� Subject: Ordinance Amendinq Section 2.05 of the Fridley City Charter Dste: July 25� 1991 At their meeting of July 22, 1991 the Fridley City Council held a public hearing regarding an ordinance amending Section 2.05 of the Fridley City Charter. This section of the Charter relates to vacancies in the Council, and the amendment would alter the manner in which vacancies are filled. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 410.12, Subdivision 7 the amendment now goes to the Fridley City Council for acceptance or rejection. There is no provision for amendment of the amendment by the City Council. Accordingly, I request that you present this amendment to the City Council for consideration at its meeting of August 12, 1991. WCH/jb � ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.05 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: That the following section of the Fridley City Charter be amended as follows: Section 2.05. VACANCIES IN THE COUNCIL. 1. A vacancy in the Council shall be deemed to exist in case of the failure of any person elected thereto to qualify qn or before the date of the second regular meeting of the new Council, or by reason of the death, resignation, removal from office, removal from the City, removal of a ward councilmember from that ward, continuous absence from the City for more than three (3) months, or conviction of a felony, of any such person whether before or after his gualification, or by reason of the failure of any councilmember without good cause to perform any of the duties of inembership in the Council for a period of three (3) months. In each such case, the Council shall by resolution declare s�s� a vacancy to exist_ a� s�a�� €e�t�a•��. If a vacancv is declared to occur before January 1 of the fourth vear of the term of office in question the Council shall call a special election to be held not less than €e��- €�� thirty (30) days nor more than sixty (60) days from the time such vacancy is declared. The Council shall desianate a neriod of no less than five (5) consecutive workina davs for the purpose of filinq nomination petitions in accordance with Section 4.06. In the case of a special election to fill the vacancy, there shall be no primary election. The candidate receiving the largest number of votes shall be declared the winner. The winner of said election shall be qualified and take office immediately upon certification by the board of canvass and shall fill the unexpired term. (Ref. Ord. 857, Or_ d;) 2. T� ..+- �.,<, �;,,,� ��,� �P�t�e�s��-e€ �� e��F}� �s �e�ise�-� �ess �har� ��r � ��_m��}�e�s� ��e �e�a��}�g �e�ae�s If the vacancv is declared to occur on or after January 1 of the fourth vear of the term of office in question the Council may call a snecial election as indicated in number 1 above or the remaining members of the Council may, within thirty (30) davs of the vacancy declaration by unanimous action, appoint ��s��e�� e�e�s �e �a�se ��e-�e��ae�s��ia-�e €s�� -�,T a c�ualified citizen to serve the unexpired portion of the term If the vacancv is declared within forty-five {45) days of the cteneral election date the council shall exercise their � discretion of a�bointment as needed but no special election shall be called. A councilmember so appointed shall assume office upon appointment �he-e�r�e� ef €}��q ��a��e�-� �iae��►� G-s � a � � �ae a s €�� a�sr a�a�ais�� w}�} }�o �e �e—sea� w�t� t�e -s�-r-�� e�t� ��c�-�.�ar- e.1,-.l 7 .rl�.�.�,�.p_}�c? sv�TllT�'i�6'�'i iT�v&�'i 'G2=�6 €�� ` =&gpv�iita$i2ii�� (Ref. Special Election 3/25/75, Ord. 776, Ord. 857, Ord. ) 3. If at anv time the membership of the Council is reduced to less than two (2) members the Citv Manager shall order a s�ecial election after the manner nrovided in Section 2 05_, the nosition of City Clerk is also vacant the Chief Judge of shall order such an election lRef Ord ) PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1991. WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK • : r �► � i Community Development Department PLAr�1VING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: August 8, 1991 �'� - To. William Burns, City Manager ��y�'- FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a Vacation, SAV #91-01, by Eugene and Jean Hagberg; Block 23, Hyde Park Since the public hearing on July 22, 1991, the City Attorney and staff have been investigating various issues regarding the proposed vacation request. Specifically, Councilman Fitzpatrick had requested an opinion regarding the following issue: 1. Can the City require the alley to be kept open if the City has not established an alley on the right-of-way? The Attorney advises that the answer to this question is that until the City does improve the alley, the abutting homeowners can use it for any purpose (gardens, constructing fences, etc.); however, the City Attorney wishes to investigate the issue of whether or not an alley has been created by "common law usage". In order to do this, he would like to ask some of the property owners in the area questions regarding the usage of the alley. He also advises that upon obtaining additional information, he would like the City Council to table action on the item until he can analyze the responses and provide an opinion to the City Council at the August 26, 1991 City Council meeting. Also attached is a letter from Jerry and Barbara McNurlin, awners of the four-plex located at 5820 - 2 1/2 Street N.E., and a police complaint filed by Mr. Measner regarding a vehicle parked in the middle of the alley behind his home. MM/dn M-91-583 Jerry and Earbara McNurlin 250 Sylvan Lane N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 July 30, 1991 Ms. Barbara Dacy, Director Community Development City of Fridley 643i University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ms. Dacy We 3re writing tc sought by Eugene �it,y vacate just north and south i and 2 1/2 Street. express opposition to the vacation, SAV #91-01, and Jean Hagberg. They are requesting that the the north end of the unimproved atley w�ich runs rom 58th Avenue to 5gth Avenue between 2nd Street We arz the owners of the fourplex located at 5820 2 1/2 Street and share a common driveway with the fourplex located at 5810 2 1/2 Street. At the presznt time, there is virtualiy no traffic using the existing alley other than our tenants for a turn-aroun�. W� are cancerned that closing the north end of the alley would generate traffic through our ared which is af'ten used as d glay area by our tena.nts chiidren. We would support closing the entire alley but not jUSt the north end. Yours truly, - -- --?�-��?��-------- rry McNurlin 7A ��. '�� ' .. � , '' Barbara McNurlin :__3[�=I:i� R:�All�?�c � �5:u�: c��: z�EC ;�oa�; lJ�=rli�F YEAPOM ORA�!: (99Q?1 INCIDENIT REPORT FRIDLEY POUCE �EPARTMENT �. il� � i� J1IN0020600 psiENSE Op INCIOEN / �� /7 � �� i, .• e�,,../_'�."-� �` ' a�7 S/ M T W T F � p�TE AEM�TEO T�ME RECENED p�SPATCNED TWE AqRrvED TKIE G9�►LETm �' � �. � � ��.,�'^l/� � yJ .� l �J � / % /� G NR�: `- ��dto �_ ( /� . i' FS .iJf OCCYAAED � �E �� ► - AAOn! � INC �% � :1-�' - �i/ l�� :2 �--� '1wCE o� OGa�naE�CE o� • A• al�ni ARR 1�3 7 � l� I• ta pe�soe dur wauf OF CO�►1J►�M MCT!�-� ppd � /� � _ � Y - v/sual � -0ff ��_ �/ o-s..c / �7 -P� ./'� c°/' d `!� ,..L t� � +q�EwDOqE55 - Hp� E . ' M • �sil PRO� .1`�7 � -2 � J—�c/- .-?� ��'-r T - otaer ws�►+eu wooAess ilork �E U �tE►ONTEO 81f � �� . � /Ls � ADO�iE55 • • ~�E �/ � Cj� � � � pii�CEp ASS�GNEO!� ISN YOC D3SP_ ��/� G SOWO � I�EKACEwEMT�YALVE �l�'r!-� -2� .�_ � YnLUE OF W►YA:iE 15TlNG OfflCEfifS1 SUPVR AnROvI1� . VAWE 11ECOVEwEp `f� " //� �il'. �E OF Mu�ST �NESSES AppnESS hqNE �. Of � � % / " % G°� J`� ��_ /� �7� /� i+. �� P �^ �• / :;� n��./ l�-/�-- :., � �p�� / -� � ur 1- � ✓l P � "� �.� ��-� ,��. „�'i .f �` ��- ��r��.._ v ____-- . ^ s� � ' � .r, � � �' �is. o ��' �,✓n Pr a � _ � , � � � � �� . �7 / . _ _ " i /. r // /7�.� � � �-�u % G � i. AOO�TlOMAI. �. � �t_� . : �" !i /'� � �/ � �... � _� � ..� /7 �/ �- %��f �.� � ,��-.. _ /i �/� o � �1.�. � .-� .a . � � ��il / / � �� -:/ 7 � . �` ' ��, � �' � !� T �. � �L�J��-// � // � �_ � � / �i _��. � - �%n ._/if � ,i 'G .r l��G� .; � �� /r /_ �� . .� / � , �.• l ��,_ , � % l n .�if �-, l� �. /� r. /� �� c•� 7 .-/ � ��i- � ��/" i %.-� . , c,1.i: -1 .- <� � /� . / l,� P.�� s�-�r � _ ,.,/� % � .��.�� ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIR C OF THE CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1. To vacate the 12 foot alley in Block 23, Hyde Park, for a distance of approximately 243 feet south of the south line of 59th Avenue, generally located north of 58th Avenue, south of 59th Avenue, east of 2nd Street, and west of 2 1/2 Street. All lying in the North Half of Section 23, T-30, R- 24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota. Be and is hereby vacated subject to the stipulation adopted at the City Council meeting of SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code shall be so amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1991. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK Public Hearing: July 22, 1991 First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: 7C CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 24, 1991 ��_�_��_��_��_��_�� CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Betzold called the July 24, 1991, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Members Absent: Don Betzold, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Connie Modig, Brad Sielaff Sue Sherek, Diane Savage Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Mark Kvalheim, Bailey Enterprises, Inc. Jean Dufresne-Sombrio, Children's Charm, 240 Mississippi Street N.E. APPROVAL OF JULY 10 1991 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the July 10, 1991, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTiNG AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. CORRECTION TO JUNE 26, 1991, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to amend the motion on page 3, paragraph 2 as follows: "to recommend to City Council approval of vacation request, SAV #91-03, by William Pickering, to vacate the southerly 15 feet of the northerly 40 feet of a drainage and utility easement located in Lot 11, Block 2, Innsbruck North, generally located at 1467 Innsbruck Drive N.E." m UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. l. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING, ZOA #91-01, BY MARK KVALHEIM OF BAILEY ENTERPRISES. INC.: To rezone from R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General Business, on Lot 17, Block 5, and the south 7.3 feet of Lot 16, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying east of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the south line of said Lot 17 distant : PLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING, JULY 24, 1991 PAGE 2 76.61 feet west of the southeast corner of said Lot 17; thence north to a point in the north line of said South 7.3 feet of Lot Z6, said point being 75.86 feet west of the east line of said Lot 16 and thereby terminating. Together with a nonexclusive driveway easement over the North 10 feet of the South 17.63 feet of Lot 16, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, generally Iocated at 203 - 205 Mississippi Street N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLiC HEARING OPEN AT 7:31 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mississippi Street and 2nd Street. Located on the property is a two-story office building which shares a common wall and lot line with the adjacent building addressed 201 Mississippi Street. The proposal is to rezone the property from R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General Shopping Center. Ms. McPherson stated the property has been zoned R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, since 1958. At that time Lot 17 was one entire lot, and a building permit was issued to construct 201 Mississippi Street (the west half of the building). In 1958, the City Council also approved a special use permit to allow the building to be used as a dental clinic which was required under the Zoning Code in 1958. Offices were allowed as a special use in the R-3 zoning district. Ms. McPherson stated that in 1959, a lot split occurred which split the parcel into the two current parcels, and a building permit was issued for the construction of 203-205 Mississippi Street (subject parcel for rezoning) . Since 1958 and 1959, the uses within the building have complied with the original special use permit issued in 1958, specifically, dental and medical office type uses. Ms. McPherson stated that in analyzing the rezoning request, three criteria need to be evaluated by staff: district use, district intent, and whether or not the parcel meets the district requirements. The proposed use of the consignment retailing is consistent and compatible with the proposed zoning district of C- 2, General Business. The C-2 zoning district would be compatible with the adjacent C-3 zoning district and uses. Ms. McPherson staff analyzed the subject parcel, the adjacent 201 Mississippi Street parcel, and both parcels combined to determine if any or all of the parcels would meet the minimum requirements of the C-2, General Business District regulations, or the CR-1, General Office District regulations. This "Comparison" was included in the agenda. It should be noted that there are several � '1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JIILY 24 1991 PAGE 3 items, specifically building and parking setbacks and parking space requirements, which cannot be met by the either the subject parcel, the 201 Mississippi Street parcel, or the combined parcel. If the rezoning is granted, several variances will also have to be acknowledged. Ms. McPherson stated that although the rezoning request does meet the district intent and district use, the parcel cannot meet the minimum requirements of the C-2 district regulations. For that reason, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the rezoning request to the City Council. Future uses of the parcel can continue to be regulated by the CR- 1 district regulations. The City Attorney previously wrote an opinion regarding issues such as this one when reviewing the rezoning request for the Suburban Engineering building located at 6875 Highway 65, which is also currently zoned R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling, and has consistently been used for office uses. Mr. Betzold stated that if this rezoning request is denied, he did not believe there are any other comparable sites in the City where the City has allowed the situation where a business is using a larger area next to it to meet the code requirements their property cannot meet. Ms. Dacy stated that actually the opposite is true. The former Suburban Engineering site is zoned R-3 and is an office use. There is no commercial zoning adjacent to that particular site. The Knights of Columbus Hall next door is also zoned R-3. The Moose Lodge had petitioned to rezone the former Suburban Engineering site, but the Commission recommended denial of that request. One of the arguments against the rezoning was that the site did not meet the C-2 requirements. Mr. Mark Kvalheim stated the problem not only the owners of the building have, but also the City, is this building hardly conforms to any regulations. This building is a split level building where the lower level is at garden level, and the ceiling height varies from 6 1/2 - 7 feet. Generally, it would be difficult to say that general office use is going to do well in there. They are looking at some physical obsolescence. The question is how to deal with that. Unless the City is interested in having the building remain vacant for extended periods of time, it is a problem the City is going to have to grapple with sooner or later. Mr. Kvalheim stated that the tenant that is requesting to be in their building is currently doing business in the City. The tenant has a children's consignment shop in the Rice Plaza Shopping Center across the street. Their status as a retailer is somewhat overblown. This is a very low impact retailer. Their volume of customers and traffic is quite low, and that should be given some consideration in trying to determine how to create some economic � =� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 24 1991 PAGE 4 viability for this building. If the two buildings are considered separately, his building has about 4,000 sq. ft. A dental office occupies 2,000 sq. ft., and they are proposing that the consignment shop occupy the other 2,000 sq, ft. which has been vacant for at least a year. There are 12 parking spaces. They cannot conform to the building and parking setbacks or parking requirements, and he thought these are situations that have to be overlooked. Mr. Kvalheim stated that in trying to establish some history of what type of businesses have occupied the building, he had heard that at one time a furniture retailer occupied the space. He had no other information of the impact of that business, but maybe it is something that could be investigated further. Mr. Kvalheim stated that in initial discussions with staff, staff recommended the rezoning. Rezoning the property seems to make sense for this particular tenant. Mr. Betzold stated there are parking concerns. He asked what happens if a lot of people come at once, and there is not enough parking? Where will they park? Mr. Kvalheim stated there is an apartment building with a parking lot adjacent to the property on the north and Holly Shopping Center is to the east. There is the possibility of some type of cross- parking arrangement with the apartment building or Holly Center, but they have not explored that yet. He did not believe that the consignment business would attract that kind of traffic. He believed that they could have parking problems with some other uses as well, such as a chiropractic clinic, an attorney's office, etc., which are "legitimate uses" in the GR-1 zoning. Mr. Betzold stated that he did not think they could look favorably on this rezoning request favorably without some additional parking. Ms. Modig asked if the rezoning request is denied, what is the property owner's alternative? Ms. Dacy stated that if the rezoning request is denied, the property owner still has the ability to lease the space as office space. Of course, this does not help the proposed tenant. Mr. Saba stated that if the City does rezone the property from R- 3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General Business, and the proposed tenant does not stay very 1ong, then the property owner can rent that space out to any business that is allowed in C-2 zoning. Ms. Dacy stated that if the Commission recommends approval of the rezoning, then the property owner will have to petition for variances to bring the property into conformance to eliminate its "nonconformity". She stated staff believes it would be wise for : ♦ PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. JULY 24, 1991 PAGE 5 the property owner to investigate the possibility of a cross parking easement with Holly Shopping Center. Ms. McPherson stated that the two properties combined require 21 parking spaces. There are 12 spaces for 203-205 Mississippi Street, so they are short 9 parking spaces. Mr. Kvalheim asked if it is possible to insert some language into the CR-1 regulations to allow consignment shops. Ms. Dacy stated that would require an amendment to the Zoning Code, and that process could take 2-3 months. Ms. Dufresne-Sombrio stated they need more room for the consignment shop. They need to be out of their current space by September 1, and they have to give one month's notice. Mr. Betzold stated that if he knew Holly Shopping Center was willing to grant a cross parking easement, then he would be a little more inclined to recommend the rezoning. Unfortunately, he did not know that at this time. Ms. Modig stated the City makes exceptions occasionally for special circumstances, and she wished there was some way to accommodate this business. Mr. Bruce Lundberg, 235 Rice Creek Terrace, stated he saw the notice for rezoning and was curious about what is being proposed. He stated that 2nd Street is the only exit onto Mississippi Street out of this residential area. He would be concerned about a rezoning that might increase the traffic in and out of this area during peak traffic times. Mr. Sielaff asked about the traffic that might be generated from the proposed tenant. Ms. Dufresne-Sombrio stated the shop's hours are 10:00 a.m. - 7:00 p.m. Monday and Thursday; 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Wednesday and Friday; and 10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. on Saturday. She stated they use 2-3 parking spaces at the most at one time. There is usually ._ no more than 1-2 people in the store at one time. During sales, they might have 3-4 people in the store at one time. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:15 P.M. Mr. Kondrick stated he would be in favor of the rezoning if the property owner is able to get a cross parking easement with Holly Shopping Center. �' � P_LANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 24, 1991 PAGE 6 Mr. Sielaff stated he would be concerned about current policies and the overall impact of a rezoning. He had no problem with this particular business, but there might be problems with future businesses. He stated he would vote against the rezoning. Mr. Saba stated he did not have any objection to this particular business either, but they should look at all the possibilities that could go into this building under the C-2 zoning. He stated the Holly Shopping Center's parking lot is heavily used now, and he did not know how receptive Holly Shopping Center would be to granting a cross parking easement. Mr. Saba stated that if they recommend approval of the rezoning and the Council approves the rezoning, then one-half of the building would be zoned C-2, and the other half would be zoned R- 3. That seemed rather strange. Mr. Kondrick stated this is such a small tenant space that he did not think there were very many other uses that could go into that space. Mr. Sielaff stated he did not believe it is worth taking on all this uncertainty by recommending approval of the rezoning. MO ON by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend to City Council approval of rezoning, ZOA #91-01, by Mark Kvalheim of Bailey Enterprises, Inc., to rezone from R-3, G�neral Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General Business, on Lot 17, Block 5, and the south 7.3 feet of Lot 16, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying east of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the south line of said Lot 17 distant 76.61 feet west of the southeast corner of said Lot 17; thence north to a point in the north line of said South 7.3 feet of Lot 16, said point being 75.86 feet west of the east line of said Lot 16 and thereby terminating. Together with a nonexclusive driveway easement over the North 10 feet of the South 17.63 feet of Lot 16, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, generally located at 203 -205 Mississippi Street N.E., witki the following stipulation: l. A cross parking easement must be obtained from Holly Shopping Center for nine additional parking spaces. Mr. Saba stated he is also concerned about the signage that is allowed for C-2 zoning. UPON A VOICE VOTE, RONDRICK, BETZOLD, MODIG VOTING AYE, SABA AND SIELAFF VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 3-2. .•� � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 24, 1991 PAGE 7 Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on August 26, 1991. 2. RECEIVE JUNE 27. 1991, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES• MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive the June 27, 1991, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CIiAIRPER80N BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 3. RECEIVE JULY 9 1991 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the July 9, 1991, Appeals Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CIiAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 4. OTHER BUSINESS: The Commission members received an update on the Comprehensive Plan as requested by Commissioners Saba and Sielaff. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Betzold declared the motion carried and the July 24, 1991, Planning Commission adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully s bmitted, �� Lyn Saba Recording Secretary : � � � I Community Development Department NG DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: August 8, 1991 � TO: William Burns, City Manager�`� FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Rezoning Request, ZOA #91-01, by Mark Kvalheim; 203 - 205 Mississippi Street N.E. Attached please find the above-referenced staff report. The zoning ordinance requires that the City Council hold a public hearing for all rezoning requests. Staff recommends that the City Council set August 26, 1991 as the date of the public hearing. MM/dn M-91-570 J.M. Lapinski, D.D.S. 201 MISSISSIPPI N.E. FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432 PHONE 574-7505 August 3,1991 Mayor Nee and City Council Fridley Municipal Center 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley MN. 55432 Dear City Council Members, I am the owner and occupier of the building at 201 Mississippi which shares a common wall with the building 203-205. I understand that the council will be discussing the rezoning of the building at 203-205 Mississippi Street N.E. from R-2 to C-2. I believe that the present owners ultimately want to sell the property and for the short term would like to lease the vacant space. I think that proposed tenants are appropriate ones for the building, but if the zoning is changed then the future use may not be appropriate for the location. I am opposed to this change in zoning. Once the zoning is changed the council will lose control of the type of business that can move into the building. Yours truly, . M. L nski D.D.S. : I �'J� 0 5� I9< � � STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE CITY OF PLANNlNG COMMISSION DATE : July 24 , � 99 � F��L.� CITY COIAVCIL DATE : August 12, 1991 AUTHOR ��dn REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCAT{ON �ITE DAT�A SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACEIVT LAND USES & zoN�NG UTIL�TIES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS FINANCIAL IMPUCATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES 8� ZONING ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATtON ZOA 4691-01 Mark Kvalheim To rezone from R-3, General Multiple Dwelling to C-2, General Business ' 203 - 205 Mississippi Street N.E. 6,750 square feet 28' Idt coverage R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling R-2, Two Family Dwelling to the N; C-3, General Shopping Center to the E and S; R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling to the W. Denial Approval Nw coANEn � SEC. /� i �� ' �� 22 CONDQNiNIUM NQ 9 23 �r�, 8J ZOA ��91-01 Mark Kvalheim NI/2 SE�.� C/T Y OF � Z I N//1 � 67 AVE_ N_E_ 2 ■ 't � 9 \ ' 5 . � _ 'i. i �, w F � r ��a��a��es�r. r��a�.m.�� LOCATION MAP ZOA 4�91-01 M...�1. V��.. 7 1... _ � o� ZONING MAP Staff Report ZOA #91-01, Mark Kvalheim Page 2 RE4UEST The petitioner is proposing to rezone a portion of Lot 17, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition from R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling to C-2, General Business, the same being 203 - 205 Mississippi Street N.E. The petitioner is attempting to locate a consignment retailer in the building. The proposed tenant will be renting approximately 2,000 square feet of building area. SITE The subject parcel is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mississippi and 2nd Streets. Located on the property is a two story office building which shares a common wall and lot line with the adjacent building addressed 201 Mississippi Street. Adjacent properties are zoned R-2, Two Family Dwelling to the north; C-2, General Shopping Center to the east and south; and additional R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling to the west. HISTORY The property has been zoned R-3, General Multiple Family since 1958. At that time, a building permit was issued to build the building at 201 Mississippi Street. The City Council approved a special use permit to allow the building to be used as a dental clinic, as required by the 1958 zoning code (see attached 1958 City Council minutes, and 1955 zoning code). Also, Lot 17 had not been divided. In 1959, a building permit was issued to construct the 203-205 Mississippi Street addition. At that time, a lot split occurred which split Lot 17 into the subject parcel and the remaining parcel. The parcels have been divided as such since that time. Since 1958-59, the uses within the building have been of the office nature, specifically dental and medical offices. ANALYSIS In analyzing the rezoning request, three criteria need to be evaluated: district use, district intent, and whether or not the parcel meets the district requirements. The proposed use of the consignment retailing is consistent and compatible with the proposed zoning district of C-2, General Business. In addition, the C-2 zoning district would be compatible with the adjacent C-3 zoning district and uses. Staff analyzed the subject parcel, the 201 Mississippi Street parcel, and both parcels as a single unit to determine if any or all of the parcels would meet the minimum requirements of the C-2, General Business and CR-1, General Office District regulations. � Staff Report ZOA #91-01, Mark Kvalheim Page 3 The CR-1 regulations were also reviewed as the uses allowed under the special use permit issued in 1958 would fall under this zoning district category. The result of staff's analysis is displayed in Exhibit A. Reviewing Exhibit A, it can be noted that there would need to be several setback and parking variances granted in order to bring the property into conformance with the district requirements for both the CR-1 and C-2 districts. Specifically, the parcels cannot meet the minimum parking requirements; they can only provide from 1/2 to 1/3 of the required parking. Based on the determination that the parcel cannot meet the zoning district requirements, staff recommends the Planning Commission deny the rezoning request. Although the property does not meet the minimum requirements for both the CR-1 and C-2 district regulations, staff recommends that the proposed uses for the subject parcel continue to be regulated by the CR-1 regulations. The City Attorney has determined that in cases of nonconforming zoning patterns such as the subject parcel, allowing the CR-1 district regulations to regulate these types of parcels is appropriate (see memo from Virgil Herrick, City Attorney, dated August 27, 1990). The Planning Commission should be aware that the owner of the consignment business will be in attendance at the meeting. Both she and the petitioner may request that the Planning Commission and City Council make a determination that the consignment use is similar to the uses in the CR-1 district. Reviewing the permitted uses in the CR-1 district, the proposed use is not similar to a professional office or health care service. Items are sold/traded and the use is commonly located in retail areas and shopping centers. RECOMMENDATION AND STIPULATIONS As the property does not meet the requirements of the C-2 zoning district, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the zoning request to the City Council. Future uses of the subject parcel can continue to be regulated by the CR-1 district requirements. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission voted 3-2 to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. The Commission conditioned their approval on the petitioner obtaining a cross-parking easement for nine spaces from the adjacent Holly Shopping Center. ` I Staff Report ZOA #91-01, Mark Kvalheim Page 4 CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council deny the rezoning request, as the property does not meet the requirements of the C-2 zoning district. [•� ► Mark Kvalheim ZOA ��91-01 i � Q � _ __ � . . .:�i� �!S �� L � � G'-1 � c, `�.i// � � � �� y� �� • ��-O� ` --•,---•----+r � - —..._,.,. - _.,r . - - y _ sr G �6 - - - f . � �G - ' __ _,i\ ��• . 1 �� —� � '— — ;�s%Y � L 2cr` ` ' � 1-: e : ,+, � , F , � _1 . � �°-s' � - \\ 4j�\ `° ��p . . \ � . , � 4' 1 � . =o � ,�r.. � � �S : � o_ � � ,\\ ��. ,� �� ; � � � ., �;.� � j C �. : . ; � . .,\ . . , � ; � � ��, : �) `�� y � C .r �' � � i �^ `` \� � � � � � F � �c> ' � ,� ` q \ \ �.o� �� v nl �' �, � 1 `�. �' j ' � �� . � 41 , ' � \� 'J �� • � � � Q � ` . \ + .�� •� `^ ^ � � `h � ,� - � � � � . � w \ � (�_ V � 1�1 (V Tf �_�.� � !� � .,\ i \ � � I �`' � � l[ ` � � � . . � ' �- � y � , � � , . � .,� '1 i � Q � � � � � � 7 , �� , ��.. � � . Y 1; �p�.. ` r ca Q 5'a i ! .�i\, � � � ' > � � ! ; �.; ,\\ ,I ` - - oS£ --- -�� i � ,\�, , � , , . . - _ '� ►, n - �' G� -t� � `- • � '�1� c� . Q '•.� i �i � "� ! .q� �`� ; `�i, � o. � \ .� � � ' `� o �`�� `� 0�� 1 � ' � ^` � � � �`�� , � :� ° �.�`� �� 3 �_.. V �. � � �� ' � ��; � � �I ,, l� i . ` ,�' l: � � � � , � � ' . V �� .. �� 4� ! � V `9�� N� ' �,—� `9--~--�— — \ � : �,o�Q � � � �° `� • ' ` � � � ., .. , , �t,, ��_ �` � : �� ---=�� `. ;�o, � � � � � � � ' i �- . � � - � I .. , �; � � � �� ,. — � L _� Y i _3 _—.L,� � � � N � �r °T��at�;��rd.��r � I �� I �o � S � � l �a � • L 9a��- � v� � 3 S S_�_ _ _ .� � � � � s — SITE PLAN E%HIBIT A COMPARISON OF 201, 203-205 MISSISSIPPI STREET: DO THEY MEET THE CR-1 AND C-2 DISTRICT RE4UIREMENTS? Lot Area Lot Width Lot Coveracre Setbacks, Building: Front Rear Side Adj. Res. Setbacks, Parking: ROW Side Lot Rear Lot Building Parkinct, Required/ Available 1/150 (retail) 1/250 (office) 1/200 (spec.) CR-1 General C-2, General 201 203-205 Office Business Miss. Miss. Together ------------------------------------------------------------ 15,000 sf 75 ft 40% 35 ft 25 ft 15 & 35 ft 30 ft 20 ft 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft 20,000 sf N/A 40% 35 ft 25 ft 15 & 35 ft 50 ft 20 ft 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft 5,670 sf 63 ft 18% 35 ft 27 ft 0 & 23.5 ft 27 ft l. Driveway exceeds 32 feet 2. No striping exists for the parking lot 3. No handicap parking space designated 4. Minimal landscaping * Items in bold would require a variance . . 0 ft 0 ft N/A 9 ft 13.5/6 8.1/6 10.1/6 6,750 sf 75 ft 28� 35 ft 16 ft 10 & 0 ft 16 ft 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 8 ft 26/10 16/10 19.3/10 12,420 sf 90 ft 23% 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 8 & 9 ft 39.5/16 24.1/16 29.4/16 : :; � � � � 205.16 CR-1 GENERAL OFFICE DISTRICT REGUI.ATIONS 1. USES PERMITTED A. Principal Uses. The following are principal uses in CR-1 Districts: (1) Professional office facilities inclnding real estate, lawyer, architectural, engineering, financial, insurance and other similar office uses. (Ref. 888) (2) Health care services including medical, dental, optometrist, chiropractic and counseling clinics. (Ref. 888) B. Accessory Uses. The following are accessory uses in CR-1 Districts: (1) Signs. (2) Of£-street parking facilities. (3) Off-street loading facilities. (4) Storage of inerchandise, solely intended to be retailed by the principal use. . (S) Solar energy devices as an integral part of the principal structure. C. Uses Permitted With A Specia2 Use Permit. The following are uses permitted with Special Use Permits in CR-1 Districts: 03/91 (1) Wind generators and other tower mounted energy devices. (?) Solar. energy devices NOT an integral part of the principal structure. (3) Exterior storage of materials and equipment. (4) Day Care Centers. (a) At least one (1) off-street parking space shall be provided for each 100 square feet of useable day care floor area. (b) Reduction of parking spaces may be allowed when provision of space required for parking stalls, due to the particular nature of the proposed use or other considerations, Would be an unnecessary hardship. Adequate open space shall be provided to satisfy the total number of required parking spaces. :N 205.16.01. CR-1 DISTRICT REGULATIONS USES PERMITTED 205.CR1-1 a, .�c > EO; � � y C : �n � .n a�'a 00 ir ��b •S Ynw � � �� L ++ d �� ;a� � � � y � n' � : C � � �V :-�aw N � � .� E � a .� � � a y r a v �o � C :... � � � o m w i. � G .� 7 � N a'� no �� O O �� °J � � E •� �i. � au � p � �. .a y vi i. w p'� � � � w .`�� f� a C.� 3 cS � .i'�' c., .., Q 'Cf � ' ra N C � � s�. � � � � � y .L" s�. � y"d °c.'.� �� °�a 3�°," �," �'� 'd d w a.�r+ C�." O � � '" C i .,.u. Gki � � a��+ �-�+ Q.� C � A c c�,3��^ a� � �+ [ W .+ 3a�Y` ,°, �� AEa�,��.e Ck �ac.....,3 �d �' p C y di ^�, .� .; C �.. O CC � 'G = 'O .... u � � �� t� d u y C 7�« y�� Y a G� �� ,Q'c��o �yuC�u��_+r ��,�;o �,= ua•:: �� 0 y fL, V v i�i 0 � � � a� , °. . . .�' _ ° a � a � . c • oo ca � � o.�s `� o 0 o�v d o � w v.O io � G�'� � p, ;� t`�i vcy7oa�^ oa, .°1c�,c ��„°c'G�a� E"«+d�va:a,� � C �m�yEw��,��o b .� � q«+5�+ a�3 ".° C cw. � 3 .+ � �e^�o [ %-, i�.. . e� � .a � �� O � ~ A w C c, o •� a o y � � � o :C 'D w � � 7 '.'�7 .� w A � �] � W W � :� i ' dti �° 7 ._ a� N C � �� a, b � �-°'a�, O a+ � y � 0 � d ;, �' a q a� � u� Ri d � O � � N d A V � yyCabi � �'O � .�c�`�� .r o a � d � O .� V +' � X � +-°'oa •+ y a.r y M C :a+v� > � � � •�» > >, � a�c,, o ._ CV � � L w � � O O'� :�+ p r+N d,°" 0 �',� o :., u �cs�.�� c�.�N� �� N � � w � „V� � � O L � o �� o. 7 y y.Y N � H � � � y � � y i.. ld ? ,p O .0 ai � .0 7 � w � m� ��. � � � x Q 7 a E 7 A � A�in. � � � j-�+Uk7Q � �� Wr'paz avaU r�A�c� .'�A�� ,�,�r�a � O ��H��. °A�qU ri��A�Ey W � a � � � i. N � � �� ' Q � M �p a a � � y u � O � � �� «'�Xp a+ v e-1 'C U ^� � �7 df 00 i+ G C� � G .0 h C�� C C W C'' C y C= y� m �c o'" y c, o,:, c.a o- o o p, E m d _' �� Vf 67 y�+' 'Q CJ ... OC • td �� C Ri � •� r. m �,'oao w"a cc oc.�aoo�c d� ..� �d..�� v,...�o �r: o c, , a, „ a;, .. � e w a, d^'' � rO�j L N � fJ y u"' L� i�-� .C�' j.C� C G! y L w" fa i >+ ° c 'o " ° ° � � i° � � a c. c. cd. °' .c oo � o � �; c " � m.=_ � � a,� '� w a+ a, ° >,'a � .a V c `: `' � `° ..~�, v>,c�•�,.� `� ucLE�cQ o � ��" �6 y��' m.L �C Rf oo � q C' TJ � Vw.. Ci •'� w�+ C. �' �" n.�o- «c°� �� y�3cp,sy� c O� �'"�� si°.a�, a� �� ;� 01��>°yu'O" ° '��.�5° �...'� ��,m�v � -� m��ao� a�~..--�".o'�M'd � ��o v a Q u 00 O C ai �00� � �,� N��'f� ai..,^'"' y a � o •�,..� eaeoV..��; �t� � �� cNwq�w� ��.00� a�°a'.n�'LO �5 �i � �i � �e y '� ., p ++ ... �-�+ �� c�, y v id 'O CVi d� d y C�i N f' v�i C w 7 O CO ^.0 :� �.G � d •-iZ•.. C,vi �•m••asu��c.�a �c+•.•.aa--wvo�w--mm �� r�iJ 12 .0 f'„ � . l t„ U fyr 0""'� � a��' q �� ..�"+ CO.C«'",p'U'�.O •""�^��o,�o ,° "�`�ma„`�„OH 7E,�`,d��•�"�:' c�ob�= �:: = a�i � y q� C� N Gr vi }' v�� U A Cr CL� � �' U2w C.�� ,^ V] a�, a�, [� u`° 'a ,c e�° y� 3 a E� a�°i v y� t+ � �� N %+ �7 � a V l tA � U t�q � � .,�.. m a .pd�c a'ti �n �, �� a 000� �� c a`, E o��sa a a 3� E ro'^> c� o�°' L°. �� o, o� a° p. �' o �� y � O �U � G' Gu/ w N�0 E'O .ti Eti� �' 3 cd w y�� O ca j O O cN,f �� p 0 c�,. 9��- z l� � t" 0J u.'' f" � U'O G�� 7 6Fi ~•� '��' U r��i F�� F C�i��..�'+ � 4�""= 003 N�"" ul :. C� s. �0 7 M N:� ... "� y c9 ri :s..��n��.�:�uao--v,• �n�au�:�c,�, oi � r — ✓ S: � � 7 > y v o s. �"a� � � � +'' 3 � •� y - v�, �'��" � C��E�' ��a �w y � d O ^ � ��,, °'e.a o a m a� 7�N�.. � cy0 � .'�.� 7 `° d o � O 0�w� � Ar � � � 1-1 � z � ao� �� :��A � p� C7 ��z M � �qa V w U�3 f/] (3'+ Q w� � • � � c� �� °�; a�, y 3 L � .., � u ,.X (,� o «+ ., .., > • 7 q O� 3;� z. L� f. p� «� a±: r� UI �� c a �„�, �v ;+c�'.Gj y � ,'3 S ��'�'`�°°"°J` .�a '. �p � p� _ ,C p = , Q' pC � ��'',D�C�Aa�� L m�- 3 e, �� eoG o ^��^ p p YN� C y� �«�°atl`°o�... � m�°a,ci°•.! � oo� v"_. oa � cW,^ � � °�'°�.� mw�S Hwa�i °(�,v� O'�i 'C O a+ ul � C�OA 4�1� ��t! �� C'a� �w G c y % O �'' � �� o � � �v C� e o m � W 0. d � o .�o� � G,•S zdo � � ao � � � Q ��t7 a �� aFA � iAw .a � N M � o4K�� ed � M �Z�� u Q �, a � 8 c. �. � ri � � � � ea � y V t�. O G�`p, y � k 47 t�" .� � � 'O �p,;A'� .� $ � �� d d awC7OQ� � � �� `° >' c � ��v�� a o �o 00 0 8R '-�. a �; y d � t"' O dD � m �o m g� 5 °J 3 a A � �o ^ � � � N C Y'n � �Q C � � 3 � ci � ri � � . 1� � '= o ��s a'� v ,� m ^ � � O � �,, � ._ ;ovd � u � � � �i G G � �.' � .,�.� � O � Vl f/1 � ..i �+�oa� w v A.� � V� pp� � �a�>u n V .� H Q N a e � .� a y G/ H ad �-i � � � � 0� � f+ � 41 6� ,bp d � � C� �^ 00 ,��'..o � r �EaR o O� y u'NO� C ti�w �� ti� ��, �'°,�iOO�=°°« %�3��a �e�oe"�,y�uae d.°� �d.°_ � a,�m�.°c��a� at � �i � � '�i G Cp °� u a+ � :: 'dtv da �.aa�'a��as,Ew`°�°'�ae'°aQ'i �.s ar y��b �� ow �� 7 C a�i � u� ,..,da >� x�o�$��x� ;n�.�Cm °3�•-��°up�� 0 aatly� °��c.«��;�='�� N�auE�°��°�,'3.�dad�ai A �r�.y' V} �v A � ��W aad � U � i]W � � M �'�a c � .�°.� A a ,..� �Ql� Cfi S '� � i � N co .j � d a� � � :a N C c�', o � c�'. U � � � � � `a c tA � Q � � v y , C � td 0 y y �W � •d � � � = � > � `�� ' C � O. C v; '� 'O 07 a,•-�� ,�„`��oa ^ w H r«c��o U��»s �>y�a`� {,� � 7 V �'' '� C�d+��+A u .e a�a � � � A w�c�.;y � d � � 3i'� o e��$o � �b a '� � � �°,'� k1 � � A ++ � a� � a3000 Q � e � e°'o c b � � a 3 a � « �'b � `' vi c. � •� �� 0 �� a .�. .� e°o °1 a y a, 7 � M �+ eo � ... a � u .�C a y � N°:a � ` ^ ' ,,., CJ Pj ^ ^ � c � ^,U.=_ �� O cd w H �� a dr � vi� y`��ye! %Q""«�"n' � a Vl V1 V~ C� �. y� i'. `+ .� '°�°' "4'00�`"� ,� � �, .� i+ : � ° �°,''� c =v� L�- c01cF� o�u�°,�^ dCO�a... oc��c 'v,��=o�� ^'C.�rw n�'CJI��C�. C� .,, V t� q y w �.�."r. � u y m r 'C O C. �O °�c,�'^a,a •, ��oe �.0 �+ i. CO... � Z c0 ..�. ,�,� `� p ".�L' � C vOj � � � � N ,:C �i�� y� �+.�.��....«r. Q O G 0��-�' U p U C e'3 �4 �.��w U.... .Gs.. � :S�`C M tM � T V � tV-�. .0 C :� � y r � � a+ y i ��+„ � U u r vi a C O'C « u o e•- p C QC�.! tuA G�., M1 a+ � e e �n a=° � v 'C�,�C Q . �vyvio �:z'�x E � u c � Q,y � � a7O�'O�� oy=d= � w. tT. i�. ... W � � d � �� s �� :� �G w' L � ui �c 7 a� M a a � � � fq � L.. 1 > i a � a .� : C � � � w ! d i U �; � U M C r G�-� cr�i C�u-' C C�: C CC C C�� C C« C£ y� i-+ .f. � G r��= L. •� R: �, � O Cy�- O OLW O'C E GO� � a � � M � O � � � :,+ c° � �s> > � � c � �• c c 3� ��,,�.a.'�"" u. pC ,r„ d � N p�V, �Q o+ U• �•., ^ � ��t ag o ?�'��'oec.3d`"E c,.,ai .+ca��Edo C q�� O� U O�� 4t : O�,saeoo`Q� c�c' � m.+� O Ew GLO�•'� ��. Govnc:►1 1�i►,�,�l--e� laS'p� • La Grange, Jehansor., P:a-e1, Sheridan, anri :•:c�;�e. and the fo11o�.�t,�g memDer:, voted a�ainst *he sa*�e: Hone �'�??� :r1J''C:; SAIL' nT SC.T• T�'ICi: ::'AS :i�CLA?3=D DUI Y FASSE] A::J /i� �- _ ::�, ;{eticn by I�a�el, secon�e� b.y �he��nan to adent re�cl �ior.. '�'et!cn carried unani-eL._3y. !� nresente`1en w�s na^e b,y i+�-s. Laur?e Johnsen ::es�e:r. F:c-�s a^d '!r. L. I:clme, Dou6las Fir Plyti�cod Assoc'.a cn, in re.-Gra tc use of nl,yu�or� for exteri cr wall s and th use ef n].vwec;: f fcr h�r.!e develcpment. Mot;cn b�� :•:olke� s er_de8 bv S-�rjdar., to refer ent're l�atter to L'�:°]njng Stan *6s Cory�i�tee !'or recc�^�^er.da-'cn and re�crt. T�:otion c2^ ied unani-:ous7}. ro�lo�•�:r.g nurlic hearing, rr.etioz� b:cafel� secended ry YIc1Y.e _authcrizing "'aycr and City N:ana to sign and accent f�r,al nla` cf �iitzeman Addit±cn. I✓.o . cn carried unan? ~oLSl}�, ro".'.cti:°r.5 d`scussicr., r►ot' .�y ''clke, seccnde� hz� ;;T� o? tr a^:er.0 �?�e dra;t cf Or3in ce !`l�(� *�• addir_g ±her-tc a n�:�� :,:,.. ti�r. a� : ellor�s: " Section �+. It f here'�t� sneci*'ical1y prc•�ideo t:iat :�ri-� re .�ct to each of fhe above zoning c!iar.ges as :�ade he�e' . r.o �er;.i�t shall be issued by the �;•�1c;=�:- '^snectcr "�`r. cne (1) yPar of the cnange, exce^t a.t�•r annrcval ;' the sa�ne c:te'ne� *��• t?-;e Citv Ccunc`1. "oticn c rried unar.i*�ous'y. '•:eti . bp t:clke, seconr.e5 by i�aeel tc acce�t secend :•e��`r: • ei roir.ar.ce '=100 a�:er.fi'rg t�e zonir:g ordinar.ce of ��e C`- •: � �'_�d�e} rezcnir.e certair. lots in Rice Creek �laza Sc�.^ /::�;!_� t`cn. N.cticn carried uran`°ously. .�' �Ck.':J (`F` �:'T`-^,l:' S ?tE�C:;' - July � � �oKg N.e:nbers presPnt: Ciun, Shaffer, PIu�, Gcodrich, G: if� ;��s �. �, reques* for �lajver cf minir�ur� side lot ^eouirF^��- . r:, the ccnstruct;cn o? an attached ca:�ocrt to witr•j^ `�r�e (?) feet cf `::e stde Ict line at 6c•til _ 6th St. t:. �. :,eouest b;� Ja�es ?. SF.:ard� o�•mer. Board recc-:�e :is a�.rc _ "a?, ad?c'_r.ir.g orenerty o::�r.er si.gn�d iet-er sta*'hs '^e -:�:i nc cei�ctic_^.. �. �:^.e ^eque�T for a variance on *he s�de ;�ar�9 reou±re--:c:.: Sro�^ f i��e ( 5) feet to three (31 feet cn Z•ot t^, �• eer. ��:• =1ec:- seven f�l, Chris*;.e Additicn S'or t!�e ecr.s�ruct'rr. �_ s-. a�tache9 garaee, the a•�dress at saia loca±icr beir.g :�%1 •,.��-�-� �t. P;. E. Request by Edgar ^ha.er, o�:mer. Eear1 reco.:,r.:er.ci; s--r�- val, ad�oinirg prooerty o::•ner sigr.ed letter s`s"_r.r� �-�� ^ nc oriec`�or_s. ' ' "'"" .. A reqL�st fo^ a vari ancs on tre s� de ;�ara _•e��.'re^�r.- ;' � five (5� feet tc t:�o ar.d c_^.e-half (2�) feet :cr �::c cc:.- struc*icn of an attached garage at �7F1 - �!es*_ !'core T.a'.�e Dri-:e I<. E. Reoue-t by Gerard Bib�au, oi:�ner. ?card reco-.^.��:; sr r�•�-:- as detached garage in r-ar yard r_ct feasible becavse ?c' � to lakeshore. " � 4• ==� roousst for-� �peci�l a�se-permit tor th! ODC^BLif.^ e`' a d�it�l �2laic m Lot seventeen {17? end sc-:t:: 9. ? feet of I�ot �izteen {�61� �ock five (Sl� Aice Creer Plaza, SoL'.= ; 2 1:; �ddit!on� being the �ot •t t3ie llortheast corner of ?Sississipn! 9treet ana Secor�6 Street. That e time 1l.mit be aet and R-� �esien�tirn �e veed �'ar xhis �ermit. � �eQuest .�y► Righard .J. .Trezor.e� D. D. S., 1?7 Hartmar. jCircle. 3card ��co�tenc�s.aapscval. ;�roperty a� joins co�,er- Cial o�cner`y-on �ne side, wo•-ld bc desl.rable esaet to co-^�ur.ity. 5. A requP;t for F�a+v�^ �f s'.de vard r^auire:nent fror� ten (1t`) feet Le se��en and a?:alf (�-k) feet for censtructi�r. c•f attac�ed garaee ar.d nerch en Lot nine (9�, Block five (`�), P.onnp Fndit'or., 5'•'_� - 7th S'_reet 1:. E. Reoue�t bv Takeland Pui)�ers ano r,�rc!-ASers cf nr�-+erty. Board reco*_^.�ends anproval cf re- oL°s` a- a}v•ti�g nrc-er;y {�i?1 1,1a��g �,•:ent,r s;x (261 feet side yard. ' .6. A rec�pst *er ::atve� ef side ya„d reqa;re:�ent frca *er. (?") feet to �ig^t (8` feet for ccnstructi�n ef :hree (?! re�rce^ d:•:e_] ir.P t:ith 8`tac ;eo gar�ge sr.d nerch cn floer a?-e•�? aa-a,e cr: "et *� irtp (�!`�� Blcc?: three (3`, .*•ic�cre Iak� �:!lls. � 3�nuest cy ;:cl:ar� Kirsch� Si17 Jackson Avenue� i:��• L'*ie';:cr,. �oar� reco�^�ends an-,rora? as a porah on `oa of gara�e d�es r.ct crast�tute 1lving nuarters and require�ner.t fcr �a •er� •. s cr.:.y .°jve (�� feet side �az1. F. r:. Shaf`'er, Cna+r:�ar. R. Q. Grif; i�.hs _Ti. C. Goodr; ch ' . H. rlum !•'c±i�n rp ;.her' dan, seccaded by Johanson thet ?oard oi' A��ea? s Rercrt be accen�ed in its entirn:y. ?�'otic.r. carr'ed unan'��us?�:. _Ibi;:�t"::v CC:•:"T:�7r:2 =t?"C`RT - July "� 1�'S8 i� P e' ^' t w �.� �' L7 ..t-. S� �.°2. 1� '=t - ..^.2 . _ ..8� i�2_ L' n I. E re��s' Sor rezcr.'�� :rc^: 3_� qe::cral mi:lt'_r.'e d::• i"g, `• C' �-? PC'.^.2?'??' ti'L'S'_.^.P.SS. LC�+� �ti'E"]'tV-S;7C (2: � A^� r'e^�\'_ se:�er. (27`, °lccic sjx (�-? 1:a-.^,?�t-:r�s ti3dit'rr. to '•'ec?: .icsv'?le, t!?2 S�'!!f '.'�'_!:P� LW� rC^t`/ f0!'L ZCtS C'l Lti12 �8.^;~ 5'a2 LF�r: �tre••:, c^� :�u�-6^e9 txeat�• fe�� (12�'! South of 76t'- As�eIIU�. C1��-:�F i,,..s��. ccl� 4�� St. Llopd �P8?'S . r , 1:r�, :...,• ia� Ds-ris, ��?? �'h 5=.. a.^.d : ce �'a?�- ,�5/5�;ol�tn�;}:±., a��ea1•e� ^c� '�A2r'nr: cn °ezcr.'_ng. Keco^Te-sd �� '�y l E��J t� a� ne ccr.s��era;{c^ he �'�-er. a* **�{5 t!^:e as ti i:�d re s� F c.. zcne� a^d '_^ . °p;•r cf r.^�;o.,� ., u? ..a: , . • . ; _ St� `e _��. . _ln(` n a^s a�:i r••�,. _�.. ,e.. Coure. -aY.e s!-i_ar ac:`-n. Secrr.3e: F�ghes. '?ct'•cn ear- rie�. II. To con-ider t�e nToocsed nrel'...ina�y o'at cf Ric? CTFp}- �la�a, �:C"`.7 ji^.�'-'�.^_. t'Qt.,p 8 31:��^'jt:' $'C.': C= ^.BT-� Ci :.'F 1c�r`�eas� ^ua^,e� (i,'�'-�1 0: Sect ^ "::� ]:or�h::est _eer. (15! an1 quar�er (': -; 1 c° Sec`icn s;x`e �(1E), ^ot:•ns�'^ th'rty (?'), �an�,e twen;.y-fo�r E?'-�, the ^+e be!ng nrcner�y Nort}: cf :tice Cree�, i•:ps: c.*' Pn'_ve�sity �n�e P?. E. �'=, rrr.es� r:adse^ aeare: :�e*c-•e Cori:.:ss'oa �r. beh�l_*' cf vre�osed �lat ci �ic� re�Y. �laza, 2corth Adniti�n. 2•:cticr. �� Eueae-, secended by ' e t�?at olat be apnrcved. b:o`_;c-. c?rr`_ea. TTj. "� CC^s'_der `._Q DTC^•f5°_� areli-�'_aary D18� Ci :re V'r^?`_C� G+_lle�*_e F•.' ;t�o*; e�� 'lerence ?arY A�dit'c!? l��r•� :;ort^ cf r'ississin�' `ree� and �as� cf Jacysoa Street ard 'ot r.'^� (�) Ai-ditcr' Sti:bdivisi-_^. "21. 'h'. lie FricY.son eopea*ed ir. be!:alf �S Droresed nre1±-'_- nary r,l . of t'�a�o:� La^ds kd9i"or.. After d'scuss'�n t�e -A'_ `.p^ 1:2 t8�•�p � U�•:1 FTCC PtpB8:'f5 nre {L^'.:13:',`,' D.'•Et C` 8�� Qr t�'1O� 8_^@8 8.^.�1 kC^=:S C��t tf.E C@�tC2�'.^� Oi t.'C�.:.^.OE_^V stree~S. ''r. Z{3zac a^-�ea^e� tc tal`� o.^. nr�n-sen vaca`i�� ef ?c a^d J' . 8.^.� ��L." nq@� !'�+.. g':tf� _\'; S� .. ^'�`•".CS^_S. t?@CC>'".^..�.^UE:: 8T r. 0 ' P Y Deed transf.erred Nov. 13 1Q59 �ZI�V �1. F?-idle�r Town - City or Village KENNETH W. CAMPBELL, School District __141±?k...._.. ._.. County Auditor Mill Rate-General._.279.�.2_ . . - -�--- --- Anoka, Minr.esota �• 12g8 S t at e-----.. .6. 22 -------- ------ � Total ................................. .. Dear Sir: - ThA following described, property ..Lot 1? & S. 7.3' .of:.Lot 16, .Block 5, � - Rice Creek Plaza South�Add, ..____._.._..._.----•-•-----------------�------ --- ----�--.....---�---�---�-�----........--�-----•-------------�--�---�----.....-----•------------•-•- --�---...--� -----. ..._... was on May 1, 19 59_.__. assessed as follows: True and full value of land $ ........... .................................... True and full value of buildings $ ................................................ Total true and full value $ ............................................... Assessed value $._.._1544-._NH_____________________ A portion of the above parcel, described as follows TAXES General $._?��Q.._��. St at e $------.. 9. 60:--...-�--- -.. S p e e i a7. s $.-----------•----...---- -�- --- -�- Tot al $..4�40. 56....----��- - - _.__See__ reverse___side •---_-----------------�--------- --------------�--�-----�---�---...---�----...----------�-- ---.....--�--- - -------........_...-----._..._._ ----------- �--�--- -....--�----........----....---------�--------- --...._._...--•-�--�-----..-..-�---�--- ------........---�- --- was, previous to January lst, 19 ....��..�._.., sold to .....................��'oll C. Grotr ......... ............... ..........................................................� making a division of the tax necessary. -�------ -- ------------- -�-- - �- --�- ----------- ------ ----..................._. ...-----�----------�--- --- Based on a total true and full value of $ ...............................................for original tract the portion sold to .............._Groth_.,.._._.,___.________._____..._..__...._________,._,__..._,.....should be assessed as follows: True and full value of land $______________>>`:�......_._.........._.. General $.__11.,.72__.___., True and full value of buildings $---------------------------------------------- State $............��................. T o t a3 t ru e and f ul l val ue $ ....... ....: .(�-,,"�-.------ ---.---------- S p e c i a l s $...:---.- -.----------------..-----. As s e s s ed val u e $---------�-•--�-.-::'-------�-- ..--- --� --- To t al $--.11, 98 .. .. ............ Leaving for original tract True and full value of land $ ............._!._:.�::�..._..____........_..._ General $!�19.,24...___._____:___ True and full value of buildings $________�_l_�'.�_______ ____ ___ State $.._...9�.3!�____.__ .; , _--�= . . T ot al t ru e and f u 11 val ue $-----------,"-- �- ==------------------------ Sp e e i al s $---.--- -. .--..-,----.........._. . ... As s e s s e d value $-------- -='�-�--==-�-- '��------------�--- To t a2 � 42�3.5..8-�--�--�---- -- � -�,•' i':': � _ ' � D ivi s i on made t hi s.---�--- :... �---- ---------- ---day o f..._...........-- .... ---� ----��---19 -...: ... ... Approved by: As s e s s o r-�--�----� - ..............-- -- -- ---�- ---�- --- --�-----.... S e 11 e r - . ........ .... -._._ Auditcr __________________________ . ___ Buyer -- -------------------- --- - -- - -� -- �- - --- --- --- - -- TAX DIVISION DATA Taaes per books: Assessed I General I State � Line 4, pa�e �17 15� 43�,9h Q.EO Tax Division: Li:�e f+, page 417 150?_ 419.24 q.34 Line 5, �age 418 4? 1.1.'77 . 26 Proof Total Original Tax . - l- ri1J1� L.3Q ,; ��j .� � �Q Special Assessments Total � I �.o. sE � -- — - -- -- � �FZC'�. �8 Ij _----- ----- .. i--__-- -- ----- 11,98 i ��-bn • 5� All tha.t part of Lot 17 a..�d the South 7.�' of Lot 15 lying '�ti'. o.F the fol. des. li�e: F?eg. 3t a p+. in the S: line of said Lo+ 17 dist. 75.71' tl. of the S� cor. of said Lot 17; th. N, to a pt. in the N. line of said S. 7.3' of Lot 16, said Pt. being 7.5.86' W. o° +'�e E. line of said Lot 16 & thereby terminatinge (S�abj. to Passments and covenants of record) : � ZONING 45.07, R-2 District: Uses Permitted. "X ref. 45.05, �45.19" 1. Uses permitted in R-1 Districu. "X ref. 45. 06" 2. Two-family dwellings (Ref. 260) 3. Boarding and lodging houses, (Ref. 70) � 45.08 1`t�� `Z��w.� (�de- 45, 071. Two family (only) dwellings; on same level adjacent to one another and noc above or below other dwellings. Except for the resIIiction noted the provisions , applicable to the R-2A Dis�xict are otherwise the same as in the R-2 D'u�ict. (Ref. 236. ) 45, 08. R-3 Disuict —Uses Permitted. "X ref. 45.05� 45.19" 1. Uses permitted in R-2 Distric[s. "X ref. 45.07. 45. 06" 2. Multipie dwellings and dwelling groups. 3, Automobile courts, hotels, apartment hotels� motels and tourist homes, provided no business shali be conducted except as a service for guesu there- of, accessible to customers from inside the building. 4, Resort transient cabins and housing accomodations and the following acces- sory uses for the accomodation of guests, boat and motor storage and ren- tals, bait shops, dining rooms, soft drink and snack bars, 5. Colleges and Universities, 6. Fraternity and sorority houses. 7. Private clubs, lodges, libraries and museums, except any that are primar- ily commercial uses. 8. The following uses, but only after securing a use permit for the establish- ment, reconsuuction, structural alteration, enlargement, or moving of any such use, after approval of such permit by the board of appeals and the city council, and subject to any coaditions imposed by such use permit, as provided in Section 45.40 or other section hereof: a, (Repealed - Ref. 97) b. Clothes cieaning or laundering pick-up stations, clothes pressirig and tailoring shops, and self-service launderies, (Ref. 70) c. Flower, fruit and vegetable sales and stands. d. Gasoline service stations and accessory geasing, servicing, ciean- ing and washina of automobiles, including minor adjustments, and repairs, but not general repairs. overhauling, rebuilding, de- molition or spray painting. e. Offices and office buildin s Eor business and rofessional uses� in- cludin�banks. m ical and dental clinics. f. Public offices and office buildings, police and �re stations. post offices. g. Public utility offices and office buildings. telephone exchanges, transformer stations, electric substations or pumping stations. ;12-31-64) h. Restauranu, refreshment st�s■,but not any selling or serving of alcoholic beverages. Zs � 58 R- 2 DISTR[CT USES PERMI TTED LIhfITED MULTIPLE DWELLING R-2A DI STRI CT USES PERMI TTED USES PERMITTED R-3 DISTRICT MULTIPLE D WELLING '�rgil C. Herrick mes D. Hoek re2e �'• Herrick Of Counscl id P. Newman ��fl`��d�, �.�i. �•� 0'a� ��°�..�T ATTOR�►EYS AT LA«' M E M O R A N D U M TO: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator FROM: Virgil Herrick, City Attorney DATE: August 27, 1990 RE: Ordinance Interpretation Questions This memorandum is in response to your memo of August 24 1990, wherein you ask for an interpretation of three differe ordinances. I will respond in the order that you hav in your memo. 1. You ask whether a property owner needs t get a special use permit for property zoned C-3 in order to tablish an auto rental use. As you indicate, no specific men ion is made of auto rentals in a C-3 district. However, mentio is made of sales of new or used automobiles. I believe that a auto rental operation is similar to sales of new and used auto biles and should be handled in the same manner as those us . Because a special use permit is required for sales of autom iles, I am also of the opinion that a special use permit s uld be required for the leasing of automobiles. I also no e that the property owner is requesting oth�r uses that requi a special use permit, and that the inclusion of the request fo an auto rental use will not cause the property owner any ditional expenditure of time or money. 2. You ask whether i is necessary for Lindstrom Metric to plat certain property i order to subdivide a portion of a meets and bounds parcel loca ed at 6251 Ashton Avenue. Both our ordinance and the St e's statute require a plat for subdivisions that create lots t t are Iess than two and one-half acres in . size. In looking t the diagram that you attached to your memorandum, I a assuming that the proposed parcel is less than two and one-ha acres. Both the City ordinance and the State statute do p mit waiving this requirement. They state as follows: " n any case in which compliance with the foregoing restricti s will create an unnecessary hardship and failure to comply d es not interfere with the purpose of the subdivision regula ons, the platting authority may waive such compliance by adopt'ng a resolution to that affect and the conveyance may then be led or recorded." Zf the affected property owners do not wi h to plat the property, but instead propose to use a egistered Land Survey, they should apply for a variance. Suite 205, 6401 tJniversity Avcnue IVJ�,'q�'�die�, Minnesota 55432, 612-571-38�0 Barb Dacy August 27, 1990 Page 2 Whether the staff should recommend granting the variance be considered in terms of whether ther ny substantial advantage to requiri opposed to a Registered Land 3. You ask certain questions regarding the Suburban Engineering builaing at 6875 Highway 65. This property is a non-conforming commercial use in an R-3 area. The questions that have been asked relate to the types of uses that can be put into the building and regulations regarding the placement of signs on the property. As you indicated in your memo, there are no regulations regarding commercial properties in an R-3 area. Your proposal to allow uses and signs consistent with the CR-1 zoning district seems reasonable, and I have no problem with that approach. VCH:ldb : ___ : __ ___ _ _ ,T T� _ 0�^ ��`_ ,^� �` CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVII�IULa N.E. w�mr�v� rII�1 55432 .' ,' Ooannn�ity Developnent D�ar�aent { 612 ) 571-3450 __• , . .. a r� , ; , +* �. 'a� ' �O�G AP�ISC�TI�IJ � � s . � � a ;+ � �� ' ' .. � - a e . y S r. «. y� i. � = :. � �� a .'� 'i'. ''' � i,. -'q.7. - � �.�.a � " � {'�� Y f s r r �v�,. � �� .�� ` ' : � . �. .. �� . .,. :, .. . �� f � �� s � � Pl�PEit79[ II�O�ITI�J� f � site `Plan �equ�Y+ed, fo� `subaaittals, see attad�ed ,„� ; �� br ��'� � Z � . s � �. � � , :; :. . , y ;. � ,. ss '. x . *� ;F�. �� ,n f' .�, � u� . p` �`. �.,- i �} - _ � :. �. . xy. e�F' : � .... r .: Lq . y"g . „k d .E'. �{'. . i � . ��a+ �w � t;. �. 203-20,5=�Mississi�ppi St:; Minneapo�.is��MN 5,5 �2-��9� � �„s��.� ': ;. �. - � �- � x�€ f � -� �s � z �� .�, r.. ,�, 5 �f � L�gal de.sa'iPtton ; � � S e e� s urv e y a t t a c he d �� ;� �;� �� + t� � . � , ` ` r k �' - . r} � � i ' � . x� �, � , .� .� .�� South': .r � !'� � 4z r � } � � ?rv T „� ;� � . ti t.� � � . . �, r : - 3=; �� - � -. > : � '�.. "� 7 "� �;, �RA��ot 1 � Baoc�c �� 5i � � '� ��Tract,/Add�t�aaZ�'Rice��Cre��'c PlazaKAdditibn ,�s��'� , � :�,�t ,� �. ��{{,', ��6. � �„ �.;,� �: �, � i� ; "' ', .. �., �; �a-i}r$'1 Ri �.i.% � id �}-� �y �iy�, �':I�i.�jtii .,isn� �..5a-�' j`� R� �' 9 1� � �.. cx .,C � a; 'd� $g - y 1 � t,, � ��i Cvrrent zonuig: �t 3 :z � � '�° Squar"e f�a� _ � �� = ��`' �� k�, , � � �g,�4 �. �,qq�� , � 7, �3 > .i`--�_ y " , � . , k' _ !'aa .. �'.�,� : �• � A„��ie".'V � •��-'a3. ��. `�"'Vr; ' � � -m ,y+�' +� w;x� . +�a #;ti�'`'F' r # � ... �C.�'�,...- . _ ., . . .. ':'�` _ . '"'�' 'i�� N' .- L� �E� . � ��y3 � `.L: - .�. 4"� �`�3 �' 3., .. ., , �'d, x� r�`': s,�, .''Ni: . ,.,.§ a � �'si�L�y+�A .r - `��. .�Yr. v^s a3 p�n-,^�� :�Y!:_ � 3 � ^1 3A '�i�-� . ��rf �^ � t � . , • t . � ..� �. �: � : � � F � . . ._ . . .. . l � �: � � � �' �� " + '' �� ' � � {t7ontract rPumhasers � Fee � must 'sign `this form prior tA Pmoess�rxl� r� � . ` '�' k � � T C F Bank�7�fsb ` ; :�; �` � � �801 Marquette Ave.,'y.Minneapolis tMN .55402 ' •' ; : . , �;; � �. , ;; , ,,..; : _ �_ ;;< < , , -;: , .. ;�: • �; LIAyTIME �pH�VE` 370�`-7000 " � � i, SIGd�Z�2E � ' - .. T�TE 6 / 19 /9 � �� Tim�'Bailey� � '�. . .. . . �. „ -. _ ; P�'iI`t'I@IEIt II�ORMATI�T . , � r� . . �"� " . ; ,: _ . y, , ,; .., . . - � � . . .. .. . � . . . . . ,� .. . . . . :��:. _ , � �B ile E r a nte r' i^s e s I n c. NAME . Y P � � Ap1�2ESS �8� :N. %Wabasha St. ,�;St. Paul MN 55102 „': . , pAyTIl� pH�E 22�4-5�482 , slc�'IURE . ,-� L1ATE 6/ 19 / 91 . . � , �. . . � ... . � , �_._.__� - -1�Ias ��Cv��,he_im ---- - - :t - � Fee: ,. $300.00 ; �.t � # `# - :_ �;.� #' .. . -ile ,t:. - tl .1: _ Aj�Z1Cdt].OTI Yi2C21V� �: ` :� .< � -,�, aR �.. . �_ � _� � � Scheduled Planning Qo�iiisslon � tez r � a7t.il�� .1� , �M�AlI�►� ��JC r e$ . dyt . 4 s �E 4q y: � t t c .- ?� ' T �- 4 f '@F +f',��` '` � 3 `, .: ,�r P �4 ` ,y - .`�s . . ., .�..m� . 4 .L..... .."r.i °"i�= ,. 5.,:� �. ��;i��h `.��.1..;_ �.��, +�.+.�; ;� ,�, . � 1' �� t�7 � ;: t� �. �- .�. . � ° a � 'v T � . . ��,R� �7��1��` �`� �k1.t» z� � �: a i.; �; �' � � � �, r; . � :. iii ,iy . � 4 : 'S�- � ..� Z � � . � ,ti . �- }}.' #} Y 'x '� ��+ P �'i . { � � � -� �, �� `ki ..1l��., J�' t✓ .. Y�T w'�^ � �� y ( ` ,*�'� r. ``s? zu i'st. F..._ ��.., z .Lev' ._4; ._ _ � r �► � � Community Development Department G DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: August 8, 1991 ��+ 4- TO: William Burns, City Manager �• FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #91-19, by Randall Olchefske of Riverside Car Wash; 6520 East River Road N.E. Attached please find the above-referenced staff report. The Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance request to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 10 feet with the following stipulation: l. The petitioner shall contact the Rice Creek Watershed District to determine if a permit is necessary. The petitioner's property is not within the jurisdiction of the Rice Creek Watershed; therefore, a permit is not necessary. Staff recommends that the City Council deny the variance request, as the petitioner has two alternatives which allow him to meet the code, one being the variance approved in April 1991 to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 19 feet. MM/dn M-91-569 � �► STAFF REPORT APPEALS DATE July 9, 1991 CITY OF PLANNWG COMMISSION DATE FRIDLEY CITY COUNGL DATE August 12, 1991 A�� i"�/ls REQUEST PERMIT NUMBER APPLICANT PROPOSED REQUEST LOCAi'ION ��'� �A�'A SIZE DENSITY PRESENT ZONING ADJACENT LAND USES & ZONING Ui1LffIES PARK DEDICATION ANALYSI� FINANCIAL 1MPLICATIONS CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSNE PLAN COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT USES & ZONING ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPEALS RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION VAR #91-19 Randall Olchefske, Riverside Auto Wash, Inc. 'Ib reduce the front yard setback fran 35 feet to 10 feet.! 6520 East River Rpad N.E. 28,700 square feet; lot o�verage 26.8� C-2, General Business C-2, General Business, ix� N& E; R-3, Gen.eral Multiple Dwelling to S & W Denial Approval with stipulatian VAR ��91-06 (" � Randall Olchefske N !/2 SEC C/TY W � � � � G�"n ` y y , � � ., ; .,. � . � •,. .Y,.�......., -� /'� \OJ ;/ / \ �, . /5, T. 30. R. 24 OF FR/OLEY l91 ��' �� - ..p � � .�, . �; i, . M ,aw j� I� � =,a L� w Y •' ��.: 11 —�—i.�`— ,� I 14 ..-� ^ �... _ � ,,,,. __ . 9B LOCATION MAP W � �� I ; ; , . ' � � / i � �, � ( �, I '4 � ., ,, � � �, ��. � E � , ,� `�, .,\ 1 ,` �` � ; , � 1 ► � � I , � ... . . �� ..1 9C �: VAR ��91-06 f� �.tandall Olchefske s' P AZ •� ' �. / . �, h � z �� ., � �.. 3 � � i 3 t : ZONiNG MAP Staff Report VAR #91-19, 6520 East River Road Page 2 A. STATED HARDSHIP: See attached letter B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner is requesting a variance to reduce the required front yard setback from 35 feet to 10 feet. The request is for Tract D, Registered Land Survey #19, the same being 6520 East River Road N.E. The petitioner received a special use permit for the expansion of a car wash facility as required by the C-2, General Business District, regulations in April 1991. The car wash was expanded in 1987. Site Located on the site is a combination gas station/car wash. The property is zoned C-2, General Business, as is the property to the north and east. The property to the west and south is zoned R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling. Analysis Section 205.14.03.C.(1) requires a front yard setback in the C-2 zoning district of not less than 35 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide desired front yard space for green areas and to add to the attractability of a commercial zone. The City Council granted the petitioner a variance to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 10 feet for a proposed car wash expansion in April of 1991. As the petitioner was preparing to construct the addition, he discovered that there is petroleum contamination of the soil on the property and that he would be required to remove the petroleum tanks and install monitoring equipment per the Pollution Control Agency regulations. The petitioner determined that he would be unable to replace the petroleum tanks due to the excessive cost and re-evaluated his original addition plans. The petitioner has now decided that as he wi1Z not need the canopy which was located over the petroleum Q� � Staff Report VAR #91-19, 6520 East River Road Page 3 tanks, he would prefer to accommodate the window washing and interior cleaning within this canopy area. The canopy will be enclosed by using brick and glass on the south wall and garage doors on the east and west. In order to enclose the canopy area, the petitioner will need a variance to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 10 feet. The petitioner's original variance granted in April 1991 still is a viable alternative for the petitioner. Although staff understands the economic/business reasons for enclosing the canopy, staff cannot recommend approval of the variance in order to treat all buildings within the C-2 district consistently (i.e., other buildings did not have canopies and were required to build to the setback}. The petitioner's second alternative would be to use the canopy as it is without enclosing it. The proposed addition would not adversely affect sight lines or traffic patterns on the public right-of-way as it is at a higher elevation and separate �roin the public right-of-way. Recommendation As the petitioner has two alternatives, one of which is using the variance granted in April 1991, staff recommends that the Appeals Commission recommend to City Council denial of the variance request to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 10 feet. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend to City Council approval of the request with the following stipulation: 1. The petitioner shall contact the Rice Creek Watershed District to determine if a permit is necessary. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request as the petitioner has other viable alternatives. � � .. . . _--- —'0--- -- --- - -- --- i / -- �-- -- . ._ _.... . + . t ; :�_ j ; � � � 7 � ' - i t- •-_.-•---- • •.� c- i � � " • '� ' (P i , � - ; ; 'i ; � ; i ;� - I � � I ' :, } ....-, s , ` 1 i y� -� , - 1 � t 1 '�� a a u. ; p_ o � � n"f I i ' _d � l�' ' ; � y � �s - . ! s _ .'�.i`--„�_i�'., � i � k , � � � � � � •� f. CJ I i j _ �i � 1 � 1 -_ ""J I - '_ . �Ol / _ I . r � d �l• / 1 � ! -------� -----._. ._ � � � � i . / � � . � ; � � � � I __� -- � , '� I -� . ' � � j � Q - ._ _ � <<, � 1 ,: : i �� 1 5 t.'� � . ,,, cr /� i _ _ _ .ti. i i � _ �_ / �, ' . � � � \_ � _„_., � � � � � � . __-1 ---- -- iA' 1 . i . ! . Kti.4 -. �: r .- I _.___, _.—.. _._ . _ . __'_ _. _ .- __ _'__'____.._._._.—.�._ I ;��'z � � d F-��.� ��Q��-, a / Y1 � � W � � � a � � � � � ..� 7 R r , ��r.� �5�}. � _r ..� ii1 � '�- ' ��I 1 T .; ; � -1 -4 f � � 14�. 3 �i _1 .� � l` I � 9F SITE PLAN Riverside AUTO WASH, INC. & Buff N' Shine Center fi520 East River Road Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Phone: 63&5130 • 571-2700 REASON FOR HARDSHIP We have determined through market studies, that we must offer Full Service auto washing services Our previous plan included extending our canopy to the West, so that we could have an area that could facilitate vacuuming, cleaning interior windows and a customer waiting lounge. One of the first site preparation projects, was to determine the environmental condition of the soil. Soil boring tests revealed that there is overfill contaminants in the soil. In order to correct this, the following must be removed: cashier building; surface concrete; four 6,000 gallon tanks and the contaminated soi1. Then the soil must be replaced, compacted and the concrete driveway restored. (The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is actually on site during this process to ensure that the contractor meets all State and Federal requirements.) There are two economic hardships that this produces. 1. It is not economically feasible to invest in new petroleum tanks. We will not be able to retail petroleum products after the tanks are removed. This will substantially reduce our gross profit. 2. This will increase our construction costs. This along with reduced profits, we can no longer afford the cost of the original plan. However, now we have a canopy that we will no longer be using for our petroleum � retailing area and can easily be converted to an are that can be used for vacuuming, cleaning interior windows and a customer waiting lounge. All that would be required is that we extend the canopy to the West 15' and then enclose it. We propose enclosing the South exposure with Chicago Brick and glass and enclose the East and West with garage doors. 9G CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVER.SIT3C AVF3�IJE N.E. �32IDLEY, � 55432 Qoaipo�mitY Devel�aeent �t {612) 571-3450 ___�_�_�...,.��_�.,..,.__.,..,.»�.�,��»..� .................................�......�.�..._.�_ _.r.....��......_.�.�.....r......................r.,._�� VARI�INC� APPISCATI� FORM Y1�UPIItTY II��ORi�Ti�T - site plan required for submittals; see attached Address : _ �O � �i(� �' Q. r i /2i �N2 � p,p t� , , Legal description: "T/1� �` !7 %� L S /�% � C-c�2 � {� S.S".f 7(� Iot Blocic Tract/Addition c�rrent zoniryg: C-� squ,are footage/acreage � t3, ��p p Reason for varianc� and hardship: Sectian of City Code: a�' • ia�• � i • •� ►, •� � . .. � �' !d (Contract Purchasers: Fee Ownexs naast sign this form prior to prooessing) �__ ��CJN1�X/�. �-• ��-C'�!C-`�iCJ'�� s_ 1_C�S/ (tv �' ,D�t:- /v, W. /'� � w ,c��2 r c. N�vrJ�;FI� . rrii 2 nA�rn� Pxor� sr'� - s�i 3 � �I � 7 � v szc�� (�.�� '2..-. n� �� Z��/ �ior� n�o�zorr � �bN��o z� P ��c�in�`sl� . aa�s _1 G s�/ a� '� .� �� v� , - !� �-1,� �?� r �N fv,�� ✓%_ .S'ri�� L �� r .�U- �r.�� -.:-_7 � v szc�� r��,,t_�G� ��'� � � ��L_/ql Fee: $ioo. oo �� + --- �p� � $ 60.00 for residential properties t �� Permit VAR # � � � � `� Rece�pt # �b � .3 `} Application reoeived by: I � scheduled Appeals Conanission date: Tv �- �/ �, / 9%/ s�n�ea citY c�ii aate: ��6vs �- l�-� � 99 i 9H , � _ CITY OF FRl DLEY FRIDLEY MUNiCIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 June 26, 1991 Mr. Randy Olchefske Riverside Auto Wash 6250 East River Road Fridley, MN 55432 PW91-139 SUBJECT: Pollution Monitoring Registration Dear Mr. Olchefske: We have been notified by the MPCA that you have recently experienced petroleum spillage at your property. Based on your response to the MPCA, it appears that your consultant may be installing monitoring wells and/or ground water contamination extraction wells on your property. In August 1989, the City of Fridley adopted Ordinance No. 929 regarding pollution monitoring registration fees. I have enclosed a copy of the ordinance and the permit application form. Please forward these onto your consultant if they intend to install any monitoring wells or extraction wells within the City limits. Essentially, all persons wishing to install monitoring well and/or a extraction well in the City of Fridley are required to obtain a permit before installing a welZ. Additionally, if the wells will be installed on City property or right-of-way, a letter requesting to do so should be forwarded to the Public Works Director's attention. If you or your consultants have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 572-3551. -- Si cerely, (� � • Wb-_,,.,''"� �� Ma k A. Winson, P.E. As istant Public Works Director MAW/ts Enclosures � CITY OF FRIDLEY APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 9, 1991 �.�.�.�..r.r.r�..r.r.�.r.r�.�..r.,.�..r....�.r.r�..r.r�..r....r.r�.�.�..�..,..r.r.,..r.r.r.r.r.,.�..r�..r�..r�..,.�.�..........�.�..r.r..�..r CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Savage called the July 9, 1991, Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present: Diane Savage, Larry Kuechle, Ken Vos, Cathy Smith Carol Beaulieu Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Randall Olchefske, Riverside Auto Wash, Inc. APPROVAL OF JUNE 25 1991 APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to approve the June 25, 1991, Appeals Commission minutes as written. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DBCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE RE UEST VAR 91-19 BY RANDALL-` OLCHEFSKE, RIVERSIDE AUTO WASH INC • Per Section 205.14.03.C.(1) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the required front yard setback from 35 feet to 10 feet, to allow the extension and enclosure of a canopy, on Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 19, the same being 6520 East River Road N.E. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr. Vos, to open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at the intersection of East River Road and Mississippi Way. The property is zoned C- 2, General Business, with C-2, General Business, to the north and east, and R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to the south and west. Ms. McPherson stated that on March 12, 1991, the Appeals Commission heard a variance request by the same petitioner to reduce the required front yard setback from 35 feet to 19 feet. At that time, �� APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JULY 9 1991 PAGE 2 the petitioner was proposing to construct a new addition to the rear of the building, leaving the original canopy as a canopy. At that time, the petitioner was still intending to use the gas pumping facility located under the canopy. Ms. McPherson stated that after doing soil boring tests, the petitioner discovered petroleum contamination on the site, and that the petitioner would be required to remove the tanks and install monitoring equipment per the MPCA regulations. The petitioner re- evaluated his proposal and decided that due to the excessive cost of the installation of the monitoring equipment that he would not proceed with the original plan. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is now requesting a new variance to reduce the required front yard variance from 35 feet to 10 feet. He is proposing to enclose the existing canopy area with brick and glass along the south face of the canopy and garage doors on the east and west ends of the canopy area. This would allow the canopy to function as the area for the window washing and interior cleaning of vehicles as proposed in March. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner still has the original variance which was granted by the City Council in April 1991 as an alternative to enclosing the canopy. Although staff understands the economic reasons for the enclosing the canopy, staff has to evaluate the variance based on other buildings and types of uses in C-2 districts, and they must treat all businesses consistently (i.e., other buildings may not have canopies and were required to build to the setback). The petitioner's second alternative is to use the canopy as it is without enclosing it, although that does not provide the protection from the winter weather as discussed by the petitioner in March. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed addition for enclosing the canopy would not adversely affect the sight lines or the traffic patterns on the public right-of-way as there is a grade separation and land- scape buffer between the two. Staff recommends denial of the variance request as the petitioner still has the April 1991 variance from 35 feet to 19 feet as a viable alternative, leaving the canopy as it exists. Ms. Savage asked Mr. Olchefske's reaction to the two alternatives presented by staff. Mr. Olchefske stated he wanted to reiterate what he said two months ago, and that is that this is not something he just wants to do; it is something he must do to remain in business. He must provide a full service car wash to compete with other full service car washes. There are full service car wash facilities in every community surrounding Fridley. He cannot make it with just an exterior car wash. Customers want their windows washed and the interiors of their cars cleaned as well. � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JULY 9 1991 PAGE 3 Mr. Olchefske stated that in April with the facts and knowledge they had then, they came up with what they thought was the best plan. After finding out about the soil contamination, he had to re-evaluate that plan. Because of economic reasons, he discussed that plan with a consultant and some expert car wash operators in Minneapolis. He stated that in reviewing the first plan, they found some serious problems with it. A customer waiting area, about 10 ft. by 10 ft., was proposed in the southwest corner. That is too small and too confining an� area to appeal to customers waiting for their cars. The area was also not convenient and not sa�e for the customer to get to after dropping off his/her car. A consultant also pointed out that there is no flexibility for traffic flow. There is no way to work around a stalled vehicle. Mr. Olchefske stated the consultant and other car wash operators convinced him that the first plan was a very poor plan and that he should not spend that kind of money on something that might not work. Mr. Olchefske referred to the second alternative pointed out by staff to operate under the canopy without an enclosure. He stated that in the summertime, that would not be a problem. However, the car wash business quadruples in the wintertime because of the snow and slush and salt. If he cannot create a system that is viable in the wintertime, it does not matter if it works in the summertime. They have to have a full service car wash that works when their business is the best, and that is in the wintertime. Reasons for needing the area to be enclosed during the wintertime are that the window solution freezes on the windows and the more humane reason is for the employees with wet or damp hands. The employees cannot provide a quality service under those conditions, and he did not think employees would put up with that kind of working environment. Another reason this wouldn't work is that it is not very appealing to have the custamer get out of the car on a cold day, go into a warm waiting room, and then come back out into the cold to pick up the car. Mr. Olchefske stated that for these reasons, he did not feel the second alternative is a viable alternative for offering a full service car wash all year. Mr. Olchefske stated he is not extending the building any closer to the setback than it is right now. He just needs to enclose the canopy so he can operate in the wintertime. Mr. Olchefske stated he has sought expert every alternative, and this proposed plan offer a full service car wash in a satisfactory to his customers. This important to his success and future as a Fridley. 9L advice and has looked at is the only way he can manner which will be proposed plan is very business in the City of APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JULY 9 1991 PAGE 4 Dr. Vos stated that with the variance granted in April 1991, the petitioner could still build to the 19 foot setback. Mr. Olchefske stated, yes, he can build to the 19 foot setback and offer a full service car wash, but the first plan is so poor that the experts are saying it will fail. Customers are not going to buy that type of layout or wait in 10 ft. by 10 ft. waiting room or the poor traffic flow. Even if he does not get the requested variance, he will not build the original plan. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTS, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED T8E MOTiON CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:10 P.M. Mr. Kuechle agreed with the petitioner that the second plan is probably the only financially viable plan. He would not like a 10 ft. by 10 ft. waiting room either. It is just too small and having only one lane for traffic flow is not very practical from an operational standpoint. If this business is going to be able to remain as a car wash business, they have little choice but to grant the variance. There does not seem to be a strong visual impact or traffic impact, so he would be inclined to recommend approval of the variance. Dr. Vos stated he did not think the enclosing of the canopy would impact the sight lines on Mississippi Way. The canopy exists now, and it will be enclosed with brick and glass, but the east and west ends will look like garage doors, which the car wash facility already has on the east and west sides, The new plan will take up less area than the first plan which had the canopy plus an addition. The area to the west will remain concrete and the landscaping along the south property line will not be affected. He believed the soil contamination is part of the hardship. He would be in favor of recommending approval of the new variance. Ms. Smith stated she agreed that the soil contamination creates a hardship. Ms. 5avage stated that if the Commission does recommend approval, she would like them to add a stipulation that, if necessary, the petitioner must get a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District. The petitioner might require a permit for building if he is within 1,000 feet of Rice Creek. MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend to City Council approval of variance request, VAR #91-19, by Randall Olchefske, Riverside Auto Wash, Inc., per Section 205.14.03.C.(1) of the Fridley City Code, to reduce the required front yard setback from 35 feet to 10 feet, to allow the extension and enclosure of 9M APPEALS COMMISSION_MEETING, JULY 9, 1991 PAG$ 5 a canopy, on Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 19, the same being 6520 East River Road N.E., with the following stipulation: 1. The petitioner shall contact the Rice Creek Watershed District to determine if a permit is necessary. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CIiAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on August 12, 1991. 2. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ITEMS: Ms. McPherson reviewed the recent City Council and Planning Commission action items. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Savage declared the motion carried and the July 9, 1991, Appeals Commission meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Res ectfully su mitted, � �. Lyn Saba Recording Secretary 9N 9 � _ � Community Development Department G DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: August 8, 1991 �� TO: William Burns, City Manager,�• FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director House Trailer License for Fridley Convalescent Home; 7590 Lyric Lane N.E. Chapter 202 of the Fridley City Code, entitled "House Trailers", requires issuance of a license for placement of a manufactured home if it is not located in a licensed mobile home park. The Fridley Convalescent Home is proposing to locate a 24' x 60' manufactured home just east of its existing facility located north of and adjacent to Lyric Lane N.E. Jacqueline Jedlicki, Administrator of the Fridley Convalescent Home, indicated that the State of Minnesota has imposed a moratorium on expansion of nursing home facilities. Nursing homes are not permitted to make typical building expansions for either nursing home beds or office facilities unless it is below a specified dollar amount. The value of placing the trailer on the property is below the State requirement. The purpose for the trailer is to provide additional area for existing personnel for a classroom, office, and a therapeutic recreation area. No additional employees will be hired. Jedlicki indicated that she did not know when the moratorium would be lifted, but indicated that she knew it would not be lifted within the next one to three years. Past City Council policy has been to issue trailers for a one year period of time; however, given the particular circumstances applicable to nursing home facilities, a longer time period is warranted. Jedlicki stated that she would agree to having a three year license with renewal possible at that time. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the license subject to the following three stipulations: Fridley Convalescent Home August 8, 1991 Page 2 1. Renewal of the permit by August 12, 1994. 2. Obtain either an installation or building permit for the foundation. 3. Provide the Building Division with the State seal number. BD/dn M-91-585 , 10A �R� .. �tC�� SUBJEC'P � � CITY OF FFiIOL.EV. - MINIVEHOTA HOUSE TRAILE� APPLICATIO�I �:porlmcnf urr�z�ar NumCer � rtev 'ap• ppproved by poto Oom. Dev. Div. Protective Insp. Dept. 910-F9 1 1 of 1 800 7/1/81 ...... APPLICANT: FRIDLEY CONVALESCENT HOME TRAILER OWNER: FRIDLEY CONVALESCENT HOME ADDRESS: 7590 LYRIC LANE, FRIDLEY, MN 55432 ADDRESS: 7590 LYRIC LADTE, FRIDLEY, MN 55� TEL. I1o: (612) 786-7700 TEL. NO: (612) 786-7700 LAiJDOWNER: NORTH SUBURBAN HOSPITAL DISTRICT ADDRESS: 7590 LYRIC LANE, FRIDLEY, MN 5543: TO B� TRAILER I�KE: SIZE: 24� x 60� USED FOR: OFFICES & CLASSROOM PERIOD OF TIME TO BE STORED/OCCUPIED: �ETERMINED - SEVERAL YEARS LOCATIOi� OF TRAILER O21 PROPOSED PROPERTY: Attach Plot Plan of Property showing Trailer Signatures of Adjoining Property Owners Granting Approval: Relationship between Trailer Owner and Landowner: SAME Names and Ages of all Occupants(If Residential Use): Facilities for Sewage Disposal, Water and Electricity: THERE WILL BE NO BATHROOMS IN THIS UNIT OR GENERAL WATER SERVICE. ELECTRICAL WIRING WILL BE PER CODE. Please find attached a check in the amount of $30.00 for parking the tzailer or $50.00 for both parking and occupying the trailer. �� : � �� --�-.--- Date Received: FOR OFFICE USE Sig Council Approval: � 0 0 0 Stipulations: Obtain either " n allation Pc�rmit" or $,;�sy�q parmit for foundation Need State Seal #- RECEIPT NO: � . � � 30.� LIC I�O� EXPIRES: Infrrnol Nse 0 I _ _� �� \ �� ` __ �` `� _'' a"T7ti�� 71ti � i 1�f t�� j ` _�_ 6� ` � ` � � �'\ \ ` • �. _ �. �-�b,MS � � ` �6 � -� � ` ` � �/6� ``2 b � _ � -- � � �, 'f ` � .�.. �— t, � '� ` �� -� � ~ -�. � �� `� �� — � ` '` -_.. ` � � ` � ` � � �.. -�, � a Z6� y •t"".. -1 � � � — � � " d �` �6 1r ` � ' � � - ` r� � � � . �� 1 �� , o a� � , �� i � } � . 6�` � � � � � �� d � , � � � �z� w � � `? �d � � .(� � . �� s � r� / LL � ' ' '�"y' � (S. tr�,.,�,� ` ,, , � . , �� , • v . � : : � •, , :`� / Z � � -""�-'� .�'� ` . � � �� - `� : '` �` h . d � V ' � n ' �. .,• �n • v I : • �. � �� \ •8�i,z ' _ � d F� .t • -� � I fi : � _` � ; � d 5 ' � � 6 1 `� 4 .., j N . s�. c� S � �l .� '\ � o., �. '� d � . ? � � _ Q;- }� � � V � � �� ' ° r� �' i � t� � �Y � ; �_ � ' '� d � • � . �,. � —'_ ' , � i � � / .,_....� L� � '/ s �� F�. a � � � �� Z � � �1 0 � V .• 2 �� p� � p d � �v� J t �� v rn rn � � J _� _.� �u - `�i w � �, J �j /.rF d .. � ---- — - 10C W/ r � � � � � �� d � , � � J L � � �� a _ �� v� r � � C'� 1� J 7 � W Q � i, C�7��9�91 13:4f; — -- --�_�--J �oKr� :, . � N�W'� co�• :,Ipt'�- WaLK �x�sT, ��pj�oDM C2� $ E12 2y1 2i1l� JURD"Ntd HF'CHITECT �� .�..�� XI��'. �� i CD�KIDt�R �U, i VE� , lj � ;�� R�Mov�. Ex�sT, � �p \ w�Neaw .o � Q � T�HIS -�`� NE�DE�-�o GL�.K- ��Is�' I�oK I �X fs�. f Sra1�Z �� XI �a+�Y ��1� o� FRIDLEY CONVALESCENT H0111E FRIDLEYs MfNNESOTA � �i �W K - .. ;�,� , � : '. s'joo� GL�.ssRoo� � , a- �� 5�'A�� D�U�I.Orr'I��1�" H�.u. �► .. � _� � 3'�$��.�PK �UaL �0 N o�F�� .I -�'H��UT�c, l��T�d� `� � �� J4RDAN ARCHlTECTS, N.A. 380 £. Lafayette Frontage Rd. 1 O ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55107 (812) 281-2701 F.y2 1.1�kJ R�MJ' �� 0 � —o � � � � � Z r � � . 1„ � �� Y��r � -��z�.�� ' SHEET _ 0 � ' ` c�,n��r a-T �O,e� � i i i � i � F q 'I . .n � ' W � 0 j � I m �� bs'_5` .� . �W _ � • �� 'V " �Fv mJ " � ¢a •I ^ � A�B [7i �• � c �W . ,� , "".�,� r � H 0 0 . �. , � -�_ 9 m � Q� oW �i � i � - ��s _ a < c� � �� \ � �/ o - � !: ; O _ � �^ ? �. m � o o' � � i. m � - � . d �� I , _ _ I - /= y � J,f9/ v F� j b� � / dd i{F�' n O il 01 ¢ • � �p, M •f v� * ,.i � y , mu O m m � U• �.�i � _ . I .-� "-- � � � �p �_ I ��I I LL � N - ` F ~ � � s� � ' / '.� ' N 1 i ° c� u� 4 �. � i 1 m � z ¢ o �� I � W � � � Y Q � � � � � . � � z� u � u / �a � � � 1� ; c f �= pw¢ � i t6B -- W � mF `'c� °'•vH � � i� � . — Q d �2F p�i � �f � / '. Q o _ � N U c� � 11 / � t- , � � , � i ! J � I � - / 7 �v � a� ; � �+ � c00 � � ��y �"4• ° , � N � � F .� ' .�� --� � V � � � �r �_"-+ %j. f,OM . N o i i i '� • m � ( o , h a, . � ` �o � i i � 1 � �3 °� i f u~i u -' - - - - - - --�r - � t c J I X= / __ � H I � I ��4 � `�� Z�� ' �� - — � 25 B-8 0��: 1 � �. _ �,.. .� � - � � �,i 8 ;: � N I, �n' � � I �' I �/ ; , I I� � � 1 1 ' I m W� 1 ' � � �3J II � � v�oa �I I � " Wrw i W ° �ma il U � � z j . �,vM3as m �O� , �„ e�t V. W N � " , 1'lvr+d v S S � z a i 1� ] FVQ t� N � �: ' "- _ � � � � � _ � � _ _ � � U X W Wy,� � I W I i . � N W� N �� ,, � ° w V ,I x' I �� I N � Z Z i � t � W � t0 J �� tD� y0 m r �� 1 � XOQ (----,-- -t6B--Wa J w ''�' - � w�a I N a � I i''� ) o -- �'m �� 1 Y v = I � Y Q a �1; ';�` ' L ° � m M � � � J T-� m 1 � �.,�}��. 7 ♦ � I m w� v ♦ i �• , y p �.�;; `' � . 1 � �a w . x ro- �•\ i � ?;ir o ^� . � � I 2 7.. n W . � W Z � � � � . � I � W �� .y'' � � _ � ( J �l 1• �`� ��:,,r';. �� ` o ,�.-;� o` — � � , l u ��-ti:�:. ap - ^ � `� ~ `j ''� J [ " � :\ � � N I �� 4 1 `\ I W �� Y (,. � ' � �'�.� ,L-----. I j" . � � �,: ; ��' ��t -- � � ; � : � 10�- � . I ;-� � � r7 �. . � � : T RECEIPT Cito �ridCe � � 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 RECEIVED OF �1 ' _ � ADDRESS F O R �i�0..��. �� /d�...,C 9/- i� 7e1. 571-3450 e-� $ _S` F! i�!� DPT/DIV ACCOUNT AMOUNT i�.� 3�� _s-�� R�CHARD 0. PRIBYL Treasurer By GLF PROJ �� - 7 ,9 � No.413 0 3 COLUwBi� NEIGMTS 1NSTY PRINTS � COLU�'.B1� NEIGHTS. MN SSa21 �D13-AN 10F D-)) r � � . DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department G DIVISION City of Fridley August 8, 1991 �� William Burns, City Manager �!," �, Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Approval of Comprehensive Sign Plan for 6875 Highway 65 N.E. The Insurance Mart located at 6875 Highway 65 N.E. will now be leasing space to a third tenant. Per 5ection 214.14 of the Fridley City Code, the Insurance Mart has submitted a comprehensive sign plan for tenant signage (see attached). The landlords will provide a multi-panel sign 10 feet long by 6.5 feet wide which will be unlit and located on the south wall. Each tenant will be allowed to place its sign on one of four 20 inch by 10 foot aluminum panels. The entire sign measures 66 3/4 square feet, which is below the square footage allowed by code. Therefore, each tenant sign will also be below the square footage allowed by code. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached sign criteria for 6875 Highway 65 N.E. MM/dn M-91-571 �� p i �j, _-L I.. ��,e Insurance Mart 6875 HIGHWAY 65 N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 July 31, 1991 City of Fridley 6341 University Avenue Fridley, MN 55432 RE: Sign Plan Criteria for 6875 Highway 65 NE PHONE: 612-574-7447 FAX: 612-574-7504 Permitted.signage: Landlord will provide, for tenant use, a 20" X 10"0" aluminum panel (entire sign consists of 4 such panels). These panels will be painted a blue/gray, and this color may not be changed. Tenant will be allowed to apply computer generated pressure sensetive vinyl graphics to this panel. Color and copy shall be up to the tenant, but landlord shall receive a scale drawing, with color choices denoted, prior to commencement of any work. The landlord's signature must appear on all drawings submitted to the City of Fridley for permit applications. � Denny Phenow Vice President 11A • fl � I--- '� J--� � `V � V � � � v�s � �I � �--- � --1 � d� a �� O es � n�� a G�a � Engineering Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance MEMORANDUM �,� TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �� PW91-242 FROM: Mark A. Winson, Asst. Public Works Directorjl�� DATE: August 8, 1991 SUBJECT: Receive Bids for Skywood Lane Water Extension Project No. 220 On August 7, 1991, bids were opened for Skywood Lane Water Extension Project No. 220. The project involves the construction of 2 sections of 12-inch watermain to improve the reliability of the intermediate level system and the capability to deliver fire flow to the Menards and Skywood Mall area. The project is to be funded by the Water Utility Fund as a carry over from the 1990 Capital Improvement Program. There were 12 planholders and 7 bids were received. A tabulation of bids is attached. The apparent low bidder is Northdale Construction o� Rogers, MN, at $108,632.00. The Engineer's estimate is $137,000.00. The Public Works Department is awaiting receipt of an easement through the Menard's property and, therefore, is not planning to request that the City Council award this contract until the August 26, 1991, meeting. Request that the City Council receive the bids for Skywood Lane Water Extension Project No. 220. MAW/ts Attachments • i:� �. _� 12 BID PROPOSALS FOR SRYWOOD LANE WATER EXTENSION PROJECT NO. 220 WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 7, 1991 11:00 A.M. BID TOTAL PLANHOLDER BOND BID COMMENTS Northdale Construction 14450 Northdale Blvd 5% $108,632.00 Rogers MN 55374 Bonine Excavating 12669 Meadowvale Road Elk River MN 55330 Meyer Contracting Inc 19145 Vassar Street Forest Lake MN 55025 Brown & Cris Inc East Frontage Road of I-35 19740 Kenrick Ave Lakeville MN 55044 Volk Sewer & Water 8909 Bass Creek Court Brooklyn Park MN 55428 Glendale Contracting Inc 3030 Harbor Lane Plymouth MN 55447 Penn Contracting Inc 1697 Peltier Lake Drive Centerville MN 55038 50 $123,466.91 5$ $124,645.80 5� 5% 0 5% 5� American Ductile Iron Pipe 12112 Lynn Ave S PO Box 278 NO BID Savage MN 55378-0278 CCS Contracting 1399 lOth St NW #304 New Brighton MN 55112 Hydro-Con PO Box 129 North Branch MN 55056 Midwest Asphalt PO Box 5477 Hopkins MN 55343 Water Products 15801 West 78th St Eden Prairie NIIJ 55344 NO BID NO BID NO BID NO BID 12A $125,309.05 $130,582.02 $141,929.50 $145,348.65 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ��,ne a, lsso COMBINED UST BY YEAR .'�:`: <�`�A�:�:::`:: � sso 67TH AVENUE EXTENSION 67TH AVE. SEWER UNE 6TTH AVENUE STORM SEWER PHYSICAL FITNESS ROOM REMODEL FUND TRANSFER FIRE EQUIPMENT BALLOT TABULATORS COURT RESURFACING PLAYGROUND EQUIP. UPGRADES SPRINGBROOK PICNIC SHELTER SPRINGBROOK PKG. & ENT. WARMING HOUSE/PARK BUILDING RICE CREEK UFT STATION EMERG. REPAIRS-LOCI� LAt� DAM ONONDAGA ST. SEW. RELINING 1990 OVERLAY PROJECT ST. 1989 — 2 IMPRO�IEMENTS 1990 SEALCOAT PROGRAM WELL REPAIR�, 5 & 10 UPGRADE WELL NO. 12 �* SKYWOOD LANE FEEDER LINE STREETS SEWER STORM WATER BLDG/LAND BLDG/LAND BLDG/LAND BLDG/LAND PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS SEWER STORM WATER STORM WATER STRE�S STREETS STREETS WATER WATER WATER 1-2 12B ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT GENERAL CAPITAL FUND GENERAL CAPITAL FUND GENERAL CAPITAL FUND GEN�RAL CAPITAL FUND PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS SEWER FUND STORM WATER UTIL STORM WATER UTIL STREET FUND STREET FUND STREET FUND WATER UTILII'Y WATER UTILITY WATER UTILITY . • �o� �� •� �� : �� :� �� .• �1� �� : �� . � '. _ _r� J' _ � - � �- � � ' � , ' G�Y� N�N�A�i li `~� �-_ .�...T. � 1 lt � � � , ' � o ti3�h� o . 'o : yO � - �> r � ! � �, �, i � ''. j � L J _ 9 ' � �_ . � 4. T—� . � � r � �� ' "Ll J � � W (1 W ir �J W � y � � i r W� c 'i� ��DMMI o w� ►i�b�oo tcv� � w I , � x o ---�---1_.--^--� u j Z w ( e o w - ----='-.f � • ,� � � � I � z� . . �I..• ; �`a n� b � ;u I � `� �, r . _�� : • : a . ,: � � 1 ��'M �� t � '1� . • � �j� �' �k � , -V I �� r ,: � . ',++� ; � a�. � k �� (` ! (1..� � ' Y • {'i; 1 � d� . � r. t � ��. :_ �,��=�,� °:, �� ,, �a � �/ �� c ! � , .` � � . �"O ? t � , i, �� , �i� \. r i �. b �, / .� • t � /'� �� 9� • � , r,l' . - � � c� m - �• w�. ` � . � / • �' M n `� co % o � .�' �/ o / � `•�, i � , - ro �, ( � I ° � 9 ( i rsva _ • ' O J�,�. � W : . �i 1 � l�NNYO � jy 7s� (fl I�M '�Y � 1tlA� � � � 1' �.o �� ` i a '! 1 � � ��22�� W � � , N� F:, �� 1 W ' . '� Y. t � W H� 1" �� T . _ . � . -- ' O ' ��— �A{YO NMONY711�"� / • — a " yo W . � �+ris °MOCkaor ' �n� I � i � � _ wO�ir.S-+i3isoo9 /i� ' ` i,'bbi Lt03��.�� j .� � . � WOAY�f➢Y 9 n t � i ; � `. ! m < W ° '� �k !') N W = K107�.. �'1 �° - � I�o . � �� W o L i�3y's _ , � O I- N 1�. 1 S • �/ \ 1 ` g �_ �• - M �.A, N �z L �� - 7niaa Si�3N � � — 1� - � , � � ' ' �► n _ r � F �.i... �137tl1f MtNfH9�18�' � _ � --- - ' I , 1 �a , o V „9 1 W I V . \ ; � I , o �)� �o � . i � �� ° �^ p � 7Y1S J�Y�td = � I � i . % t, /� � s t0 r � ? j �� ..� � �9 � L 3 � a a i _ � ( � �I � � 1� �aoM��i � W� --' .lf 3M ! � -- '• T_ _ V � I I � Mi � � = J - � � • '� u a ° `o ! ' � W ; � � '� �� / 4 2 - � � � � � �r71r �Y dl�illlt. J = N ( � . �� - S ' . (ii , ' � • �ls 9 . � � �) ' ' , . - _ I�. � �. ) ` , � (�T - 1 � � (D f� Y . � /��L = 9 ,, � , t _� �v.: � ' � --- � / ~ .., � � � r _. � � r'''`—"------r 12C �� ._ -� � � � r Engineering Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �� PW91-233 �.. FROM: John G. Flora,�Public Works Director DATE: July 30, 1991 SUBJECT: ��No Parking�� Sign Petition We have received Petition No. 2-1991 from the residents on Jefferson Street between 58th and 59th Avenues requesting the removal of the "No Parking" signs between 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on the west sign of the street. The petition included a signature from one resident from each of the homes in that area. Over 20 years ago, the "No Parking" signs were placed on the west side of Jefferson Street in response to the citizens' request because of the Little League parking that was going on in that area. Apparently, the parking situation has changed or the residents do not feel the same as they did in the past. If the Council has no objection, I recommend they receive the petition and advise the Public Works Department to remove the signs on the west side Jefferson Street between 58th and 59th Avenues. JGF/ts Attachments 13 � � CfiYOF tRIDI.EY 0 CITY OF FRIDLEY PETTTION COVER Sf�ET Petition No. 2-1991 Date Recsived JuIY 29, I991 object Removal of"No Parkinq Between 6 P M to 8 P M Siqns" on the West side of Jefferson Street (5800 to 5900) Petition Checked By Date Percent Signing Referred to City Council Disposition y3A , ' l�.,.� ��.•�c�c-- ' ��o o — s90 0 � � .-��. ��c�e �/ , - � � _=�fze- ..1u�-n . �� -� �' _-_-;:��,zi.% /Yo ��z�� _ �'. !.'r� �� /r� . , , !�-n ��''�i.e... �-�� ' � �-� � ,-�'�C ---- -.: _ _ .: - -___ __ . :; .: . _-- -,�__ _� , ...�.�� ' � �'� . �� _ �,�.� � Z y � .�` .- ' � ��i �� " ��o �./% _ � .. ��'ti s �f`� - � ,�so-� �� s' p' �z ,��" .. -- �e-�,�.- -�� y � . -� s81z �� r-�-�-n�U.,, 5T �,� _.�i.�ri"", L��%1�%��d�" J�'vG ,� p 7F7�P/`.fi�j t)" h F -- �g, i4y/ _. � /�o / ��.� 1�� '� - S�oo � :. --�� . - � ' � .5'�/-�ya .�� - - ��'3 6 /j%f. % „� . _ �: ,, .� --�: _ ; � -- - - >; . _-__{i .."__. _ f: '_ � � ;: - 13B ,� � � ,�� q� ,. ,,, ki��f-N��- ., . . - - - rt�t� ` ` �a .t! 3� ` jo � e o - — // w � � � /6 / '29 ,� ' 29 2 3 � � s � . t ' 29 2 : Z. l0/ 0 2 ^ /S Z w I7 3 B 3 28 3 , Z . 27 �¢ 27 ,� . Z 9 .. .�. /¢ 3 � 26 26 -'` 2d 5 �.N � `3 r. ° � ` .2s 2 � 2.s 6 , : �S 6 = 2 � o w �3 Y w ' P'f • Z¢ 7 ¢ 7 � � a z3 . . 23 8 23 % � 5 0 ^ /Z w S * � 22 9 ZZ 9 � 2Z 9 2 � i�r:i i . ° 2/ /o = • 2I /o � 2 / /d : 6 " // °', ti// � 6 � 2� // Zo // t Z o . � t r // _ � �9 /z /9 /2 . /9 /Z �y jZ = /8 /3 = : � �� " � � /B /3 /S � , � � s� 1 � ' �-3 ` ' �B /3 : : �� ¢ . ° � 9 � B ` w /� /f . �, /7 /�f • ; /7 /� _ . Z . /� /S S , � .ts : /f /S ^' � /617 l .� �6 /f « � "�.�`b TH AV E N U E �+ � N. E. . . _ ,�� „�� ,, s ,.��. � , . s � , o ,�,� g „30 ,�,� � ' � `_ 6 e � 22 / � 1 � � m z1 2 �9 Z � �9 Z � ' _ .. , � � 28 3 • 2B 3 28 3 /S ° Z ° m 2/ 2 ' ��•c�s f 29 ¢ 27 ¢ 27 ¢ . Z' .. ' 0 . � 2 6 S • � 2 6 -� i` 26 S ,�%i /� ° 3 m 3 ° 6 — t .:: �. �Z 1 25 2S ! 6 23 6 = . i �: 2¢ 1 ° W Z.¢ ' = 7 • lLj ` z4 1� ; . a o /3 ¢ �o � ° /9 � � � � : 2 � B ° Z ;� ' : Z < 2.� 9 ; , � 2z 9 : � : ; Z2: 9 2� , /Z � ,5 Z � /B 5 ° :Z 2 � �o �= .- `z'i /� 2� / l.q JS. o /J so � : \� 2 0 ' ii 6� � i� 6 :° �� zo ir � = 2� �a " � /9 /Z t4 � .�s i si ~w• /i Z . l9 /Z = /O 7 �-- o /6 7 0 ;�„tl.' ' /8 /3 : � /B /3 : N .� /B /,� : i�� c V� �° : � /7 /¢ t /7 /� 2 g /7 /¢ � 9 --s J�-�!> � ru. �[ � �" J1 .�./�iM � �l� 'i . r., 6 / _ s z f- � c� �>�� '� �.. VE. " /J�t� /J�lJ `� : �/6 / �� 4 ,� 5 r�i 6 � % N. E. � � * /6 /S � � o � -� � � � NAf /lp o � � �B � , � � w �v �. � � �� z z� i� � A o � /6 �. �" .3 `t" � /6 � ' � � L e �,, /S � ¢ _ /J w . y � /� 5 8 /4 � /3 6 � 3 /3 � /,z � 7 � � /z � �S ,r�" w• ��i 1 �f � 6a. � • `� •i� ar " �� . �i � .cr� . ,. ,. � O � � . ^' � 29 t 2 �` °'� za � . ,-:;� 2 r ¢ ` � f w' ZG � � W z 6 � �` w e �� ' 223 ' v v � b� a O � �/ `,� . � �0 / � R �� ,..i;-.. . �o � :d ��r��`. '� . �. . . . � ° /¢ � t /¢ -� ,/ �o � /3 2 /z 3 /2 � 3 2/ Zo � /9 � /B � �% 9 // � iz �_� /¢ � B 7 6: ro� :�' �,t2? Engineering Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, Cit Mana er �� PW91-235 Y g � Ii ' FROM: John G. Flora; Public Works Director DATE: August l, 1991 SUBJECT: Rice Creek Soil Erosion Project Five (5) residents of Rice Creek (Swanson-361, Kaufhold-375, Lambert-389, Seaholm-403, Solies-419) have joined together and submitted a request to the Rice Creek Watershed District for financial assistance in funding a rip-rap project along a sharp curve in Rice Creek. The Rice Creek Watershed District has an erosion and streambank stabilization program which provides for 1/3 funding of approved projects. Submittal to the Rice Creek Watershed District by the City is required by the mid-August. The residents have been working with the Anoka County Soil & Water Conservation District on this project for a number of years. It is proposed that the funding support provided by the Rice Creek Watershed District would enable the residents to join together to complete the project. The City is involved to a certain degree in that we have a storm sewer culvert entering the creek at the eastern end of the project area. I would anticipate that our cost would be in the vicinity of $5,000 to incorporate the culvert ripraping with the project improvements. Recommend the City Council support the submission by the residents to the Rice Creek Watershed District and the involvement of the City for the culvert ripraping. Funds for the culvert ripraping are available in the Storm Water Utility Fund. JGF/ts Attachments 14 s � twui�r RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT July 29, 1991 STREAMBED AND BANK STABILIZATION PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a rock rip-rap treatment of the outside bank of a sharp bend in Rice Creek. The bend begins at a storm sewer outlet and extends over 5 properties: 419, 403, 389, 375 and 361 Rice Creek Terrace. The length of property to be treated is approximately 375 feet. The project extends between two bank stable points as identi�ed through an evaluation by the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District ((ACSWCD). The ACSWCD also iderrtified rock rip-rap as the treatment method most likely to provide long term stabilization of the creek bank. Other, less expensive, methods of erosion corrtrol have been considered by the parties invoived including retaining walls, gabions and stacked tires. Rip-rap is #he recommended treatment for long term effectiveness but is expensive and financial assistance to the property owners is necessary if they are to agree on this treatmerrt method. The proposed project site has experienced significarrt erosion over the years, degrading water quality downstream from the site. A sandbar is being deposited on the downstream side of the inside bank of the same bend in the creek. In addition, a sanitary sewer runs through the properties involved. Based on a 3 to 1 slope of a rip-rap treatment, the sewer line would be approximately 9 feet from the top of the rip-rap at its ciosest point (measured at surface level). Each of the property owners invoived has considered how to eliminate or reduce the erosion. Three of the properties invoived in this project have concrete block retaining walls which were constructed many years ago. A recent investigation of Rice Creek by the DNR identified these wails as unauthorized structures �nd as likely to fail. The ACSWCD was asked for recommendations for approaches to reduce erosion at the project site. Their opinion was it wouid not be practical for individual homeowners to take effective action and that a group project would be most likely to succeed. A request for partiai funding of this project was submitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District in March 1989. At that time the watershed district did not have funds availabie for such a project and couid not satisfy our request. It is our intention to apply immediately for county and state financial assistance for this project if we are awarded funds from the Rice Creek Watershed District. With the number of parties invoived in this project, each with their own priorities concerning the urgency, cost and method of erosion control it wiil not be possibie to complete this project in its present form without other additional financial assistance. -�. �. � J / l NI ti.� . �, � f� ,. . � \ � � �:� RICE CREEH WATERSHED DISTR,ICT 3686 LESIIVGTON AVENUE NO$TS, 3uite 374, ARDEN HII�S, MINNESOTA b6I26-8016 TELEPHONE (612) 483-0634 Application t� the Streambed and Bank Stab�lizat�an Pro�ram Name _ p/L! �i,�� street�city�'ip �7� /<� �,e= �iE� (��' n� � 4��cEY S��/3: Telep2ione Number (d�y) �� — 2 3 / ? (evening) S'% Z -' ��/o �� .Ie� � Gaant Amount Reqwested Infiarmation to be Submitted: � Map showing prqject lastion � Minimum a� t�vo deta�led c�ost estimates � Di.mensioned cnnss sectional and plan views o� project site � ShQrt (several para�raphs) description o�Pm'P�d P�.1� including site history, a�lteraatives considered, etc... � Phutogtsphs (opti�onai) lYOTIGE TO t�pPL.IC.�NTS Property owners are encouraged to work with their respeciive Soil and Water Conservation Districts and city stafis to develop applications. Applications should be submitted to their city public works department no later than July 31st. Applicants will be notifed of grant status by September 30. Application support materials should allow for an evaluation of the application and comparison of the proposal with other projects. Applications that are incomplete or provide inadequate information will not be considered during the current funding cycle. These applications, and those which do not receive high enough priority, may be improved and submitted for consideration during a future funding cycle. Unfunded applications must 'ue resubmitted by the applicant for consideration in a futurs funding year. Applications requesting reimbursement for amounts exceeding $10,000 may require the applicant to submit documeniation showing aitempts were (or are being) made to secure local or state financial assistance to sugment District contributions. ' = ..�� . Tom Kaufhold Field Investi-gation Anoka County, MN Prepared by: Justin Jeffery, Area Eng inee� �, Soil Conservation Service Brookiyn Ce�ter, MN The problem consists of approximately 500 feet of streambank erosion on the lef t bank of Rice Creek in the a�ea of 375 Rice Creek.Te�race, Fridiey, Minnesota. Existirtg concrete block along part of the area is becoming unstable. It is recommended the area be riprapped witfi loose rock. The bank would be sloped to approximately 2 vr 3 feet horizontally to 1 foot vertically. Spoil s�ould be hauled away. Rock would be placed o� a sand—gravel bedding materia) as shown in toe protection method A or B attached. The.upstream end of the protection would tie into existi�g rock p�otection. The downstream end would terminate near the point where the creek curve reverses. End protection would be provided by method 8 attached. AI1 disturbed areas would be sodded. Severa) trees need -io be removed and � severa! pumps wifl need to be removed and reinstalled. Design wvuld be in accordance with Soil Conservation Service Standard 580, S�reambank and Shoreline Protection. Plans and specifications sfiould be provided the Department of Natural Resources and the Rice Creek Watershed D i sir-i ct f or rev i ew and any necassary perm i-Es . The preliminary ffi72,000. During necessary. 0 estimated construction cost is in the range of �47,500 to design these figures will be reviewed and revised as 14C 2 a 'a�,n y o� ui DN4^ � aOQ ~ W � N ui �Z♦ o _-_ K H��' mON�, W �w � �O W � i O � 1' � 6 �w °� � r� h i '� x � � �� W W '� a r u o� � 3 ° p rd 6 j �J A � J�� . ., � r •Z � �5 Q p � ��r �v �, � � £ m � �� P J � Z � k _ � = � � `-`" • �-' �� 3 M � �w �� u � 2 v� � � £ � _�' o�S {Jµl � '�, r-r I � N �- �'7 O - 2 � . - � J � a � Y' �', � r �! v di � u, �{ 3' �F e� �� ( /n/ �i- / , �__ ` � , � 2 � � h � � � v� � 2 w J � Z m � p � 3 � �r X P. � � r w � Ja Z � � 7 p�l t� µ � h •"o� Y� � � 0 O �Y � w —j J U � � � � v � � � z n 3 6 � P � 3 � _ � Community Development Department P G D�SION City of Fridley DATE : August 6 , °1991 � t TO: William Burns, City Manager�`�` FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, ommunity Development Director Lisa Campbell Planning Associate Consideration of 1991 Community Development Block Grant Agreement with Anoka County Attached please find one copy of the 1991 CDBG Subgrantee Agreement between Anoka County and the City of Fridley. This agreement is the instrument under which CDBG funds are allocated to communities. The specific allocation outlined in this agreement is a total of $117,683, with $77,848 to the Riverview Heights Project, $38,835 to Human Services, and $1,000 to Anoka County for administration. Staff requests that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute all three copies of the agreement. These agreements 7must be completed before the City may receive any 1991 Community Block. Grant funds. LC:ls M-91-575 ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AGREEMENT between ANOKA COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND CITY OF FRIDLEY This agreement, entered into this day of , 19 , between Anoka County, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "County"), and the City of F�idley, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridiey, MN 55432 (hereinafter referred to as the "Agency"): ' RECITALS A. The County is an urban county applicant for block grant funds under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (the Act), Pub. �. 93-383 as amended, and wiil receive block grant funds for the purpose of carrying out eligible community development and housing activities under. the Act and under regulations promulgated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) at 24 CFR p. 570; B. An Urban County Consortium has been established by a Joint Cooperation Agreement between the County and municipa! corporations within the County, the terms of which specity allocation of block grant funds to those participating jurisdictions for use in accordance with the County Housing Assistance and Community Development Plans accepted by participating jurisdictions and reviewed by HUD; C. The County desires to have certain services performed by the Agency as described within this agreement, and as authorized by Anoka County resolutions for the purpose of implementing eligible activities under the Act and HUD regulations; D. It is appropriate and mutually desirable that the Agency be designated by the County to undertake the aforementioned eligible activities, so long as the requirements of the Act, HUD Regulations, state law and local law are adhered to, as provided for herein; E. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for cooperation between the County and the Agency, as the parties in this agreement, in implementing such eligible activities in the manner described above; F. The parties are authorized and empowered to enter into this Agreement by the Laws of the State of Minnesota. G. The following attachments as listed below are hereby incorporated in this agreement and made a part hereof: -1- 15A PART I. GENERAL CONDITIONS PART II. FEDERAL AND LOCAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS PART III. EVALUATION AND RECORD KEEPING Exhibit A- Project Description Summary Exhibit B- 1991 Program as approved by County Board Exhibit C- County Board Resolution 85-42 Exhibit D- County Board Resolution 85-23 Exhibit E- County Board Resolution 86-70 Exhibit F - Certification H. In consideration of payments, covenants, and agreements hereinafter mentioned, to be made and performed by the parties hereto, the parties mutually covenant and agree as provided for in this agreement. COUNTY AGENCY Tim Yantos (Signature) Deputy County Administrator Date: Approved as to form: Assistant Anoka County Attorney -2- : Name (Typed) Title Date: r � � J DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department P G DrvtSION City of Fridley August 6, 1991 William Burns Cit Mana er �`� ' ► Y g �. . Barbara Dacy, /�6bmmunity Development Director Lisa Campbel]� Planning Associate V Consideration of Amendment to the 1991 Anoka County Solid Waste Joint Powers Agreement On March 26, 1991, the Council approved the 1991 Anoka County Solid Waste Joint Powers Agreement. The term of this agreement was for the first six months of 1991. The shorter term was necessary because the State Legislature had not approved S.C.O.R.E. until April and the County refused to commit to distributing funds it had not yet received. The six month agreement released $40,685.25 in solid waste abatement funding to the City of Fridley. The amendment: 1. 2. 3. 4. Extends the contract period from June 30 to December 31, 1991. Adds the second half of the 1991 recycling goal. Adds $40,685.25 in additional funds for the last half of 1991. Adds an additional report date for reimbursement requests of January 20, 1992. Staff requests that the Council approve the amendment and authorize the Mayor to execute all three copies of the amendment. This amendment must be approved before the City of Fridley will receive reimbursement funds for the last half of 1991. LC:ls M-91-574 Anoka Courity CoMract # 900239 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO � JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT NO. y is made this 9th day of April, 1991 (the date of the signatures of the parties noiwithstanding), between the COUNTY OF ANOKA, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY", and the CITY OF FRIDLEY, hereinafter referred to as the "MUNICIPALITY". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the parties entered into a Joint Powers Agreement on February 26, 1991, for the purpose of providing SCORE funds received for the first haif of the calendar year 1991 to cities and townships in the County for solid waste recycling programs (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement'�; and WHEREAS, the County has received $345,019.00 in said SCORE funds from the State of Minnesota for the second half of 1991; and WHEREAS, the County wishes to assist the Municipality in meeting recycling goals established by the Anoka County Board on February 26, 1991, by providing said SCORE funds to cities and townships for solid waste recyc(ing programs for the second half of 1991; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. Section 2 of the Agreement sha!! be amended to read as foQows: 2. TERM. The term of this Agreement is from January 1, i 99i through December 31, 1991, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. 2. Section 3 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 3. PROGRAM. The Municipality shall develop and implement a residential solid waste recycling program adequate to meet the Municipality's annual recycling goal of 1,485 tons as established by the County. "Recycling" means the process of collecting and - preparing recyclable materials and reusing the materials in their original form or using them in manufacturing processes that do not cause the destruction of recyclable materials in a manner that precludes further use. "Recyclable materials" means materials that are separated from mixed municipal solid waste for the purpose of recycling, including paper, glass, plastics, metals, and vehicle batteries. Refuse derived fue! or other material that is destroyed by incineratian is not a recyctabte material. The stated goai for tonnage is a goal and not a minimum contract requirement. Funding under this Agreement shall not be withheld from the Municipality for failu�e to meet the goal if the Municipality acted in good faith in attempting to meet the goal. 16A 3. Section 4 of the Agreement shail be amended to read as follows: 4. REPORTING. The Municipality shall submit the following reports semiannually to the County no later than July 20, 1991 and January 20, 1992: A. An accounting of the amount of waste which has been diverted Nom landfills as a result of the Municipality's activities and the efforts of other community programs� redemption centers and drop-off centers. For recycling programs, documentation shall be provided showing the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been collected and the number of tons of each recyclable material which has been marketed. For recycling programs run by other persons or entities, the Municipality shall also provide documentation showing that the materials were recycled by the Municipality's residents. The Municipality shall also report the number of cubic yards or tons of yard waste collected for composting o� landspreading, together with a description of the methodology used for calculations. Any other maferial removed from the waste stream by the Municipality, i.e. tires and used oil, shall also be reported separately. B. Information �egarding any revenue received from sources other than the County for the Municipality's recycling programs. C. Copies of all promotional materials that have been prepared by the Municipality during the term of this Agreement to promote its �ecycling programs. The Municipality agrees to fumish the County with additional reports in form and at frequencies requested by the County for financial evaluation, program management purposes, and reporting to the Metropolitan Council and the State of Minnesota. 4. Section 5 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 5. BILLING AND PAYMENT PROCEDURE. The Municipaf'�ty shall submit itemized invoices to the County for abatement activities no later than January 20, 1992. Costs not billed by January 20, 1992 will not be eligible for funding. The invoices shall be paid in accordance with standard County procedures, subject to the approval of the Anoka County Board of Commissioners. 5. Section 6 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 6. ELIGIBILITY FOR FUNDS. The Municipality is entitled to receive reimbursement for eligible expenses, less revenues or other reimbursement received, for eligible recycling activities up #o the project maximum as computed below, which shall not exceed $81,370.51. The project maximum for eligible expenses shall be computed as follows: A. A base amount of $6,167.41; and B. A$6.90 per household grant of up to $75,203.10. -2- � �7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto set their hands as of the dates first written above: COUNTY OF ANOKA By: Dan Erhart, Chairman Anoka County Boa�d of Commissioners Date: ATTEST: John "Jay" McLinden County Administrator Date: Approved as to form and legality: Assistant County Attorney -3- 16C CRY OF FRIDLEY By: Name: Title: Date: - Municipality's Clerk Date: Approved as to form and legality: 1:\PCH�LOW-TECMRECYCUMCONTRqCT�RECYCL9 t.AD1 �:\PCH1lOW-TECFi�RECYCU MCONTRAC7�HECYCt.91. VA t i � �� ' i � � � i DATE: � FROM: Community Development Department G DIVISION City of Fridley August 8, 1991 William Burns, City Manager �� Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Approval of Memorandum of Understanding with the Metropolitan Council and Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), to Participate in the Rental Rehabilitation Program for 1991 On December 18, 1989 the City Council passed Resolution 97-1989 authorizing the City of Fridley's participation in the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency's Rental Rehabilitation Program. Also on that date, the City Council approved execution of the 1990 Memorandum of Understanding for the program between the MHFA, the Metropolitan Council, Anoka County, and the City of Fridley. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is an agreement which permits the City to participate in the program on an annual basis. The attached MOU is for fiscal year 1991. The intent of the program is to rehabilitate and improve rental residential structures occupied by low income families. Rental single family or multiple family structures are eligible and they must be located in low income neighborhoods. The program may be used to finance improvements to correct sub-standard conditions to bring the buildings into compliance with local and state buildinq codes and Minnesota energy efficient standards. Since City Council authorization in 1989, we have had a lot of interest in the program; however, we only have one solid applicatian at this point. The owner of the property located at 5900 - 3rd Street has filed a rehabilitation application, and it is still pending approval at the MHFA office. The proposed 1991 MOU has not changed from the one the City Council approved in 1990. Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the Memorandum of Understanding as presented. BD/dn M-91-577 RENTAL REHA8ILITATION PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 1991 FUNDING AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Metropolitan Council THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Minne'sota Housing Finance Agency (hereinafter referred to as the "MHFA"), a public body corporate and politic of the State of Minnesota, the Metropolitan Councii (hereinafter referred to as the Metropolitan Council} a body corporate and politic of the State of Minnesota, � City�., of.='�xidle� � - � '�herein referred Lo as, , the "PHA") , a body. . corporate and politic of the State of Minnesota?�and the county:o� �uo�a: {hereinafter re#erred to as the Area Administrator), a legally constituted public or governmental entity, or a nonprofit incorporated organization, or an entity which has received written MHFA authorization to participate in the Program: WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the MHFA has been accepted for participation in the Rental Rehabilitation Program (hereinafter referred to as the "Program") which is to be adminis#ered by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to as "HUD") pursuant to Section 17 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, and regulations contained in 24 CFR Part 511, {hereinafter referred to as the "Rental Rehabilitation Reguiations"); and WHEREAS, the the PHA is a"Public Housing Authority" as such term is used in the Rental Rehabilitation Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council will submit, with MHFA authorization, a written application to HUD to request Section 8 Certificate or Housing Voucher contract and budget authority for use in conjunction wi�h the Program (hereinafter referred to as "Program Cert+ficates or Vouchers") and/or the PHA has an active Section 8 Certificate or Housing Voucher Program with su�cient available contract and budget authority to adequately support the Program; and WHEREAS, the PHA and the MHFA wish to have the PHA participate with the MHFA in the implementation and continuing administration of the Program; and WHEREAS, the Rental Rehabilitation Regulations require that the MHFA, the Metropolitan Council, the PHA and the Area Administrator enter into a Memorandum of Understanding which sets forth the duties and responsibilities of the Metropolitan Council, the PHA, the Area Administrator, and the MHFA under the Program. WHEREAS, the PHA executed a contract of Administrative Services on Ap=ii 24. 1990 with the Metropolitan Council which provides for the PHA to perform Section 8 application, certification and inspection services for the Metropolitan Council. MOU METRO COUNCtL 4/91 �17A NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby consent and agree as follows: 1. That the purpose of this Agreement is to: A. Specify the duties of the PHA, the Metropolitan Council, the Area Administrator� and the MHFA, as such duties relate and interact between such entities, in the implementation and administration of the Program; and B. Specify the administrative procedures to be followed in coordinating the use of contract and budget authority for Section 8 Certificates and/or Vouchers for use in conjunction with the Program. 2. The Metropolitan Council shall enter into and execute any and all documents required by HUD to obtain contract and budget authority for Section 8 Certificates and/or Housing Vouchers. In addition, the MHFA, the PHA and the Metropolitan Council shall pertorm all acts and execute any document necessary to accomplish such assignment and conveyance. 3. The Metropolitan Council shall semi-annually or as otherwise agreed apprise the MHFA of the availability of housing vouchers and certificates. 4. The Metropolitan Council shall make Section 8 Housing Certificates or Vouchers available to the PHA for the following purposes: A. To minimize displacement of families residing in projects to be rehabilitated under the Program; B. To assist families residing in projects to be rehabilitated under the Program; C. To assist famiiies who move from projects undergoing rehabilitation under the Program; and D. To assist families who move into projects which have been rehabilitated under the Program. 5. The PHA and the Metropolitan Council shall follow and comply with the provisions contained in the MHFA Implementation Handbook for the Program, and in the following documents, laws, rules and regulations and all supplements and/or amendments thereto, in Metropolitan Council's use of and in the issuance of Section 8 Certificates and/or Housing Vouchers received from HUD for use under the Program: A. 24 CFR Part 812; - B. 24 CFR Part 813; C. 24 CFR Part 882, Parts A& B; D. 24 CFR Pari 887; E. 24 CFR Part 888; MOU METRO COUNCIL 4/91 217B F. 24 CFR Part 960; G. July 12, 1984, FR 28458; February 28, 1985, 50 FR 8196; May 8, 1985, 50 FR 19475; March 31, 1986, 51 FR 10932, and December 30, 1988, 51 FR 47064. H. 24 CFR Part 51 i Section 17 of the United States Housing Act of 1937; J. All other applicable federai laws; and K. All other HUD regulations, requirements, notices, and documents entered into by the Metropolitan Council and HUD including any Annual Contributions Contracts, Administrative Plans and Equal Opportunity Housing Plans approved by HUD. 6. The PHA shall administer the Relocation and Displacement Assistance to tenants displaced because of the effects of the Program in compliance with the following manuals, documents, laws, rules and regulations, and all supplements and/or amendments thereto: A. The MHFA's Displacement and Tenant Assistance Procedures (hereina#ter referred to as TAP) contained in the MHFA Implementation Handbook for the Program; . B. The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970 (hereinafter referred to as the Uniform Ac#) contained in 49 CFR Part 24; C. The Tenant Assistance Policies under the Rental Rehabi{itation Program eontained in the HUD Handbook 1378, Tenant Assistance Relocation and Real Property Acquisition issued October 15, 1990 and HUD Handbook 7360.01, Rental Rehabilitation Program Handbook; D. The Displacement and Tenant Assistance Policy contained in 24 CFR 511.14, which includes the foliowing provisions: 1. The PHA and Area Administrator shall only use program funds for projects that will not cause displacement of very iow-income families by a family that is not a very low-income family; and 2. The PHA shall provide appropriate advisory services to all tenants dwelling in a project at the time of owner's application to participate irr fhe Program and provide cash assistance for moving and/or housing expenses to eligible persons and families, regardless of income, fiorced to move permanently from a project as a direct consequence of rehabilitation assisted under the Program. 7. The PHA shall be responsible for ensuring compliance with the applicable relocation requirements, notwithstanding the owner's contractual obligation to comply. To pay the cost of relocation assistance, the PHA may use Program funds (provided they are calculated as part of the project cost), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds (subject to compliance with 24 CFR Part 570), local public iunds, or funds available from other sources. MOU METRO COUNCIL 4/91 �7C The PHA shail, in Exhibit A, identify the availability of monies from sources other than the Program to be used on funding displacement and relocation assistance, if any. 8. The PHA shall, in Exhibit B, provide the following information as required by the HUD 24 CFR 511.40 Memorandum of Understanding: A. Organiiational structure of the PHA and Area Administrator with respect to the Metropolitan Council; B. Responsibility for inspections at initial stage and upon completion (name(s), affiliation, address and telephone number); C. Responsibility for administration of notices, determination of eligibility, and offering relocation and displacement benefits (name(s), affiliation, address and telephone number); and D Responsibility for tenant interviews (name(s), affiliation, address and telephone number). 9. The MHFA shall, in its sole discretion, designate projects to be considered for rehabilitation under the Program, and upon such designation the .MHFA or Area Administrator shall notify the PHA of the identity of each such designated project. Upon such designation, the PHA or the Area Administrator shall submit a"Summary Report-Status of Metro HRA Applicants Rental Rehabilitation Programs" form, an example of which is contained in Exhibit C, to the Metropolitan Council and the MHFA indicating the proposed commitment of funds and scheduled completion dates. The information to be provided should include: A. Project address; B. Number of units and bedroom mix; C. Occupancy information; D. Preliminary tenant information; E. Estimated number of persons and families eligible to receive Section 8 Certificates or Housing Vouchers; and, F. Program funding source. As soon as possible after the receipt of the above information, the Metropolitan Council shall advise the Area Administrator or the PHA of the availaoility of Program Certificates and/or Vouchers for the designated projects. The Metropolitan Council shall, if necessary, and as soon as feasible, �pply to HUD for the contract authority for ad�itional certificates and vouchers. 10. As soon as possible after notification by the MHFA or Area Administrator of the identity of the designated projects referred to in Section 9 herein, the PHA shall: A. Perform an inspection of each such designated project to establish what rehabilitation is needed thereto in order for such designated project to comply MOU METRO COUNCIL 4/91 �17D with the Housing Quality Standards specified in 24 CFR Sections 882.109 and 887.251 (hereinafter referred to as the "HQS"); and B. Supply the MHFA through #he Area Administrator with a certification for each such designated project listing what rehabilitation is needed thereto in order for such designated project to comply with the HQS, or stating that such designated project already complies with the HQS. C. Review the preliminary tenant information contained in the lnitial MHFA Tenant Survey, which is attached hereto as Exhibit D, or similar infiormation provided by the tenants at application and supply #he MHFA or Area Administrator with an initial determination of tenant's eligibility for Section 8 Assistance or Uniform Act relocation or displacement benefits. 11. No later than thirty days {30) from receipt of the notification by the MHFA or the Area Administrator of the identity of designated projects referred to in Section 9 herein, the PHA or the Area Administrator shal(: A. Pre-screen all tenants residing in such project by obtaining, but �ot coniirming, all information necessary to evaluate such tenants' eligibility for receipt of a Section 8 Certificate or Voucher or Uniform Act relocation and displacement benefits; B. Supply the MHFA or the Area Administrator with a completed lnitial MHFA Tenant Assistance Record (hereinafter referred to as the "TAR"), an example of which is contained in Exhibit E, or a simitar form approved by the MHFA, which lists the names of all the tenants which were pre-screened in accordance with Section 11.A. herein and specifiies the amount antl kind of benefits to bs provided for permanent or temporary relocation and/or moving expenses; C. Supply the MHFA or Area Administrator with an estimate oi the total administrative cost attendant to the allocation or use of benefits, which include housing counseling pursuant to the TAP consistent with the applicable provisions in the Uniform Act; and D. Shall take into consideration the expenses references in Section 11.6. and C. herein when determining the financial feasibility of such project. lf a project is funded and causes tenant displacement, one half of the relocation benefits and moving expense shall be provided through the Program to the extent that funds are available. If there are insufficient Program funds available to cover such expense and the PHA or Area Administrator have not identified funding sources for refocation benefits outside the Program, the PHA and Area Administrator may elect not to submit such project to MHFA for inclusion in the Program. 12. After completion of the inspection rsferred to in Section 10 herein and evaluation of the results thereof, and after receipt of the information referred to in Section 11 herein, the MHFA shall, in its sole discretion, select projects for inclusion ir the Program, and upon such selection shall notify the PHA and the Area Administrator of the identity of each such selected project. The MHFA shall not select a project for inclusion in the Program for which there are insufficient Program funds or other guaranteed funds from sources other than the Program to cover the entire amount of the relocation benefits and displacement assistance and the expenses incurred by the PHA to administer the Uniform Act. MQU METRO COUNC{L 4/91 517E 13. No iater than thirty (30) days from receipt of a notification by tl�e MHFA or PHA that a financing commitment has been issued by the MHFA for a selected project referred to in Section 10 herein, the Metropolitan Council shall: A. Explain the Section 8 Certificate or Housing Voucher Program to eligible tenants and property owners; and B. Establish efigibility for receipt of a Section 8 Certificate or Housirig Voucher for those tenants residing in such project who wish to continue such residence; and C. Establish eligibility for receipt of a Section 8 Certificate or Housing VouGher ior tenants residing in such project who wish to terminate such residence, in order to provide displacement assistance thereto if they change their residence from such project to another living unit within the jurisdiction of the PHA; and, D. Establish, upon request of the owner of the project, eligibility for receipt of a Section 8 Certificate or Housing Voucher for individuals on the Metropolitan Council's waiting list who wish to reside in such project and refer eligible tenants to vacan# rehabilitated rental units; and, E. Supply the Area Administrator and the MHFA with a written list. of a!I tenants for such project which are eligible for receipt of a Section 8 Certificate or Housing Voucher, designating whether each such tenant presently residing in the project intends to continue or terminate such residence, is presentiy on the waiting list for the Metropofitan Council, and specifying the information obtained from all such tenants. 14. No later than thirty (30) days from the receipt of a notification by the MHFA that a financing commitment has been issued by the MHFA for a selected project referred to in Section 10 herein, the Area Administrator or PHA shall: A. Establish relocation and displacement benefits for eligible tenants and provide housing counseling services pursuant to the TAP, and the Uniform A�t for those tenants who do not qualify and therefore are not eligible to receive a Section 8� Certificate or Housing Voucher; B. Supply the MHFA or Area Administrator with a completed final TAR, identifying a11 tenants referred to in Section 14.A. of this document who are eligible for relocation services and benefits, the cost of such services and benefits for each tenant, and provide verification of the total administrative costs estimated pursuant to Section 11.C. of this document. � 15. Based upon the information described in Sections 13 and 14 herein, the Area Administrator shall notify the PHA, the Metropolitan Council, and the MHFA of the number of Section 8 Certificates and Housing Vouchers required to assist eligible tenants. MOU METRO COUNCIL 4/91 � %F 16. Upon receipt of the contract and budget authority referred to in Section 15 herein, the Metropolitan Council shall issue Section 8 Certificates and Housing Vouchers, with such certificates and vouchers to be issued as follows: A. The Metropolitan Council sha(I offer Section 8 Certificates and Housing Vouchers in accordance with, but not limited to, all the requirements contained in HUD Housing Notice H 90-24 (HUD) "Use of Housing Vouchers or Certificates for Families Living in Rental Rehabilitation Projects" effective 3/13/90 to 4/31/91, a copy of which is contained in Attachment A, including any subsequent HUD Notices issued which may revise, supercede or repiace such Notice. B. In accordance with the Administrative Plan for the Metropoli#an Council, revised 5/89, the Metropolitan Council shall issue Section 8 Certificates and Housing Vouchers to tenants of units participating in the Program as fot(ows: 1. The Metropolitan Council shall give priority to a family or individual #orced to vacate a unit because of physical construction, housing overcrowding, or whose rent would exceed 50 percent of income as a result of the Prograrn consistent with its obligation with respect to the Federa{ Preference rule; 2. The Metropolitan Council shall give "highest priority" within its ten percent discretionary authority to a family or individual whose rent would be between 35 and 50 percent of adjusted income, as a result of the Program; and, 3. The Metropolitan Council shall place at the bottom of the Metropolitan Council non-preference waiting list a family or individual whose post- rehabiliation rent burden would be between 30 and 35 percent of adjusted income as a resuit of the Program; and 4. The Metropolitan Council shatl issue Program Certificates and Housing Vouchers designated for initial use in the Program to applicants who wish to occupy a vacant, newly rehabilitated unit in the Program. C. After the MHFA approves a renta( rehabi(itation project, the Metropolitan Council must issue any needed housing certificate or vouchers to families living in the project to be rehabilitated. The housing vouchers must be issued so as to give families sufficient time to decide whether to move (where they are not required to move) and to give them time to locate other units (where they are required to move or choose to movej. The Metropolitan Council shall issue Section 8 Certificates or Vouchers approximately sixty (60) days before the estimated date of completion of such rehabilitation. � 17. To provide for maximum use of the Section 8 Housing Certificate and/or Voucher provided by HUD for the Program, the Area Administrator, the PHA and the Metropolitan Council agree that the Metropolitan Council may issue Program Vouchers to families on its regular waiting list until such time as the Program Certificates and/or Vouchers are needed for the Program. The Metropolitan Council may issue Program Certificates and/or Vouchers to families on its regular waiting list after the Metropolitan Counci(: A. Considers the number of available Program Certificates and/or Vouchers, the number of available Section 8 Certificates and Housing Vouchers, the Area Administrator's projected rehabilitation schedule, the Metropoliian Council's MOU METRO COUNCIL 4�g� �7G normal turnover rate, and the PHA's project reports required under Section 9; and B. Determines the normal turnover of Section 8 Certificates and Vouchers is sufficient to accommodate the needs of the PHA and the Area Administrator in providing Section 8 assistance to eligible tenants. 18. The PHA and the Area Administrator understand that if the Metropolitan Council is unable to make the full amount of Section 8 Housing Certificate or Voucher funding available when needed for the Program, a delay in the Program will result. 19. The Area Adminstrator shall notify the PHA and the Metropolitan Council upon the completion of a rehabilitation project. If Section 8 Certificates and Housing Vouchers are issued to the completed project, the Metropolitan Council shall perform the following activities upon receipt of the notification of completion: A. Inspect such project to determine if it complies with the HQS; and B. Supply the Area Administrator and MHFA with a certification listing what items in such project do not comply with the HQS, or stating that the inspected project fully complies with the HQS. If no Section 8 Certificates and Housing Vouchers are issued to the completed project, the PHA shall pertorm these inspection activities upon receipt of the notification of completion. 20. The MHFA shall, upon the completion of the rehabilitation of a project and receipt of all documents it deems necessary to evidence such completion, disburse an amount equivalent to half of the administrative fees, to the extent funds are available under the grant, to reimburse the PHA for a portion of the Uniform Act related administrative expense. 21. Upon receipt from the owner of the project the monies for relocation benefits and displacement assistance, the PHA or the Area Administrator shall administer and disburse such monies in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 6 herein. 22. The PHA and the Metropolitan Council shall maintain and preserve all information and documents which they acquire regarding the Program for a minimum of five (5) years, and shall make such information and documents available for inspection by the MHFA and the Area Administrator upon request. 23. The MHFA and Metropolitan Council shall meet semi-annually or as is otherwise agreed to discuss Program issues. 24. The PHA will refer vacant units to the Metropolitan Council for referral to Metropolitan Council Section 8 Certificate and Voucher holders. 25. The Metropolitan Counci{ wi11 make available to the MHFA, PHA and Area Administrator Section 8 training as it is from time to time provided by the Metropolitan Council. MOU METRO COUNCIL 4/91 817H � IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by and through their authorized representatives, have set their hands and executed this Agreement the day and date stated next to their signature. The 19 The 19 The 19 day of , PUBLIC HOUSiNG AUTHORITY day af day of The day of 19 MOU METRO COUNCIL By: Its: AREA ADMINISTRATOR By: its: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By: its: MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY By: M.J. Tero Its Director Multi-Family Development 9171 4/91 Exhibit A DISPLACEMENT AND RELOCATION Assistance costs wiil be the responsibility oi the property owner. The owner will be informed of the rules and regulations that apply to the program and will be required to execute an agreement which will assign responsibility for the payments to the property owner. 17J Exhibit B A. Anoka County is the Area Administrator for the MHFA Rental Rehabilitation P�ogram Activities within the County boundaries. The City of Columbia Heights is excluded from this relationship since they manage their own RRP program. Anoka County contracts with the Anoka County Community Action Program for the daily administration of the program. The Metropolitan HF�A, will perform the Section 8 responsibilities associated with the Rental Rehab Program. Anoka County or its designee will provide information to the HRA so that tha# body may provide the necessary Section 8 services. The City's involvement is limited to program advertisement and building inspection. B. Inspections are performed by the following persons; Code Compliance Inspections - initial and final - the building inspector for each participating community. See attached list of telephone numbers and addresses for Anoka County Communities. Section 8 Inspections - See attached list. Energy Inspections - by private contractor chosen by the property owner. C. Anoka County or its designee is responsible for administration of notices, determination of eligibility and offering relocation and displacement benefits. This will be the responsibiiity of: JoAnn O. Wright Anoka County Courthouse 325 East Main Anoka, MN 55303 D. Anoka County or its designee initially collects information by mail through the property owner. We use this information to dete�mine p�oject feasibility and relocation needs. We then pass the information to the Metropolitan HRA or its designee to interview tenants for Section 8 assistance. 17K Section 8 lnspections Anoka Blaine . Coon Rapids Fridley Other Communities - Rita Anders - Lloyd Jarson - Yvonne Schwarz - Pat Wolfe - Donna Mattson or her staff 17L 0 ANOKA COUNTY CITIES � TOWI`SHIPS City o� Andovex Community Center 1685 Crosstown Blvd. NW Andover, MN 55304 755-5100 City of Anoka 2015 lst Ave. N Anoka, MN 55303 421-6630 � . City of Bethel 165 Main St. NW Box 64 • - Bethel, MN 55005 434-4366 City of Blaine 9150 Central Ave. NE Blaine, MN 55434 � 784-6700 � FAX �784-6740 ' � City of Centerville • 1694 Sore1 St. Hugo, MN 55038 429-3232 City of Circle Pines 200 Civic Heights Cir. Circle Pines, MN 55014 784-5898 City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Ave. ATE Columbia Heights, MI� 55421 782-2800 City o� Coon Raaids 1313 Coon Rapids BLvd. NW Coon Rapids, MN 55433 . 755-2880 City of E2st Bethel 2241 221st Ave. NE Cedar, MN 55011 434-9569 City of Fridley 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 571-3450 0 City of Ham Lake 15544 Central Ave. NE Ham Lake, MN 55304 434-9555 City of Hilltop . 4555 Jackson St. NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 571-2023 �City of Lexington �3803 Restwood Rd.� Lexington, MN 55014 784-2792 City of Lino Lakes . 1189 Main St. Lino Lakes, MN 55014 464-5562 City of Ramsey 15153 Nowthen Blvd. NW Ramsey, MN 55303 � 427-1410 City of Spring Lake Park 1301 81st Ave. NE Spring Lake Park, NIN 55432 784-6491 � City of St. Francis 23307 St. Francis Blvd, I�TW St. Fr�ncis, MN 55070 753-2630 Township of Burns 19800 Nowthen Blvd. . Ramsey, MN 55303 17M Township of Colu�bus 16319 Ke�tle River Blvd. NE Forest Lake, riT1 55025 � 464-3120 Township of Linwood 22817 Typo Creek Dr. NE Stacy, MN 55079 462-2812 Township of Oak Grove 19900 Nightingale St. NW Cedar, MN 55011 � 753-1920 � a C'• A A � A 0 c� a � C'f A a �1 � � f1 7 �'J z � A !s1 7 A � N > �1 i4 S r � � � � 2 :n A � C Z 7 � a :*1 N N :A C3 3 � � � A m t O n n N � m n C W O � n R O a > > 9 f7-� 1+� n n n w t A A 7 n G r A A m C r r � m n M 0 � � � 0 00 -t m 3 MOU METRO COUNCIL 17 1 7 N 5�91 X � � I'�h `J Exhibit D MINNESOTA RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM HOUSING FiNANCE AGENCY TENANT SURVEY. Name of Occupant: Owner. Project Address: AplartmeM Number:_ Numbe� of Bed�ooms in Unit: DATA PRIVACY ACT: The information bei�sg oo�fected below is considerad private and wiN not be availabte to the pubHc. This intormafion wiif be used only to determine eGgibiGty to� you, the tenant, to receive rerrtai or rebcation assistanCe a�d tor the owner to �eceive tunds unde� the Rental Rehabititation Program. Not supQlying the requested iMormation may toAeit your right to any rentai or relocation assistance you may be eGgible (or and may jeopardize the rehabilitation project. Hace/Ethnicitv oi Head of Household: Female Head o( Ho�cehoiq; Housahoid with a temale head (single, separated, divoreed, or widowed) and one or more minor children White, �t ot Hispanic Origin Btadc, not ot Hispanic Origin � Yes American ►ndian or Alaskan Native Hisparric � No Asian or Paatic lslander FAMILYJNCOME (Ust all Occupants, beglnning wlth Head of Household): Total Gross Monthly Income Total Gross Yearly Income Percent oi tient to Income Initial lease Date: Term of Lease: Monthly Rent: + Average Monthy Utility Expense/Gas: + Elec. = Gross Rent (Rent + Utilities paidby Tenant) Do you have any plans to move within the next 3-9 months: � Yes � No If yes, why: Are you a dependent or stude�t depe�dent on family for suppoA? [] Yes � No Special Characteristics of Household (i.e., dsabled, elde�ly, etc.) Are you cu�rently receiving rental assistance? I( yes, What type? IMPORTANT STATEMENTS Please caip�* �r,e �o��oncp ��.+.+o� e��h �...+ Sectlon 8 Aaslstanr,�g: 1. I choose to accept the Sedion 8 CertificateiFiousing Voucher tor the unit i� whicfi I am living, if 1 am eligible. 2. _! choose !o accept the Section 8 CeriifrcateiHousing Voucher for a unit ot my choice, if i am eligible. Dfsolacement Ascic_tance: 1. _ I choose to remain in the unit where I presently live and pay the atter-rehabifitation rent. '� 2. _ I choose to move io a unit of my choice and may request the assistance of the housing authority in finding a comparable unit. 1 understand that Uniform Act assistance may be available to me if a comparabfe unit cannot be lound and I am etigible. LEAD BASED PA�NT STAT MENT• �. , hereby cerfily that 1 have received !he publlcation �Watch oui tor Lead Paint Poisoning° and that 1 have read and undersiand the information. Tena�t Date IF YOU 00 NOT WISH TO PROVIDE ANY INCOM INFORMATION PLEASE COMPI ET TNE BACK POiiT10N QF THIS FORM,, MOU METRO COUNCIL 1�70 5i�o � �AD BASED PAINT STATEMENT: �. , hereby certify that I have received the publication "Watch out for Lead Paint Poisoning" and that ( have �ead and u�dersiand ihe informatio�. Tenant Oate RELOCATION BENEFIT WAIVEfl: Under the Unitorm Rebcation Assistance and Real Propeny Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Unitorm Act), eligible tena�ris who are d�sptaced by a project receive: 1. Moving Expenses 2 3. a A paymeM for actual reasonable moving expenses or b. A tixed payment determined according to the appticable schedule approved by the Federal Highway Administration. Replacement Housing Payment: A payment to lease a comparable decent, sate and sar�tary replacemeM urot. Other Relxation Assistance: This includes relenals and other assistance to help the tenant(s) rebcate to a comparable decent, safe and sanitary replacement unit. Vwe thereby certify that I/we have received and read the Tenant Assistance PoGcy or Ihnre have met with a representaGve of the MFA who discussed with me/us the relocation payments and othe� assisiance provided under the Unifo�m Act. Vwe understand the basic requirements of the Uniform Act. However, Vwe VOLUNTAA)LY WAIVE MYJOUR RIGHTS TO ANY AELOCATION ASSISTANCE UNDER THE UNiFORM ACT tor which 1/we may be eligible i� connection with such rehabilitation. Tenant Tenarn HRA Representative Date Date Date MOU METRO COUNCI L 19' 7P 5igo U1 � c� � Z m w O � � m � m y p O O 0 A n c � � 'o a d 3 = N y > W m � o � � � � � c � N m � Z C a+ y � Z � o � � °_ , ' _ m L A• m m � Z � a o 3 � TI � y O fl C7 "�' S . � 0 3 � �u, 3 = � v m .� z � a � � • N A � p n z n o � cmi � c .� � < - . m �u y Z A � ,,,, p o �' � �° o � 0 �n cn � w tp n — 'G � O r �. � T cp Z aa � tu N � n ; m - � �. � � a 5' � a m c 3 — Z = � y y O z v ? � � o o s� � � � — = W p O � � �o 0 � m x � � � � � � S � � - �o �,m � � < a � t/) N � � � � N --� ' � `� � � = v ,� o - � � � � 61 y � 0 3 _' � - v' � Q a ° � N � N (A y C � .tn.� � CI m cp tD � � � O fn -� Q � W � _ T C �9 y �' C � "' 7 � � a - G1 y W � y o r- v ,c oi . a n. � � v - '' m, o, ii � a .. m w � � MOU METRO COUNCIL 0 T � � s � n 0 a > a m � n� d a n c n � � > > N H m w � �, v � �� v m � 1�Q 0 � N � �D � 0 a 0 00 y D d ? D Q. j � m � � � � T �m' �o �. �n y � O �� ° m 3 d C� � "' 3' �c� � � 3 `` �,. $ � � �, Am �a d �� 8; � �o �m o �o m f � �o m � ? N N? m � m m m � � C 3 � ?. 3 � a c c y. a � y �' m 3 0 a? � � � � v O � � y fD m 9� �• � O � A y � 7 � �, 3 °- � � �v o 80 tn7 1 a� � � � v_ � �' o � a °' m � � a � � 1 � � � � � �• � o �O 3 n � rn O y `G y O a��'o � ? Q � 3 � - � j tp m 3� m � m a s `� � y n C ID � � �. a �c � ma C y � aa ° a o � �. `O � v' cu � - N N j Q � �� „ o �' a'�� m a� � w -- m w m � o � 0_ d � A � m � N m � N C d m• C. W � � o � � � � � O o � � m w � � � o a � �' � m m `� � m � �<' s d v m d N m � � � � g m � ❑ 7 d Z77 m � 0 n � � � a � fD O � O � n 0 N N Q T � � � � O n T � iii � � s � � o' � � 0 � N CC/�D� �� j A � �• ��a� ��N.a � � � . • � N o " vovvv m m m m m m � m m � O O O � � �mc)�v �' c° � o� v � � �. Z Q. n•� � � 7 � ° ? `° c. m � � 3 � � � � O .... � � ' a � T = � ?�,CZ Z nZ m �m�o � � rn z Z � � � VI � D Z m � m � � O 5�91 m X ? Q .-r rn � m Z � D � � m _ W � � � O Z � � � � D � Z Z Z e d m 3 3 m �o m N � Q .Q-_ � � n � C � � O N d 7 � N y D � � ip o m 9 � W yf ? Q � f/� � O Z C o� N � Z m o? � O . � < � �o m pp Z � a o ] T � H � y � S . o � -< H a � ,,,� Z O m -- p c� m � y Cl � O az o m n o � es w c � � < — . w m y z l'f � � O 7 • � O p N (/� j � � � � { � � T r ` OD 3 N a Z c° � n . m � � `•° ni p � .� d fp C � — Z � p y O N � z v z � � o o d � � � � � �a o 0 � � � co o ' � x � � m � � � — m o d eo ] < Q � N N j � � � N � • C � � � = � � o = � � �! — N y � o � � . y 0 D � � w � w (p N C 0 y � N N �D � � � m �, � -� o � tD � _ T G � d C � ^ � 7 n d ^ p1 y 0 � y o r � �O Z d d o a � � � = � o� n 'D n — 'u °' � � (.�Tl CD �J MOU METRO COUNCIL Z w d � � 3 � � m N � p O 0 � {Y � C C � � N � > > N y D � � m o � � � m m � C N Q N m � Z C d °f � Z m o ? H .+ O m W . < n � m � m a o 3 � T � y O n Cf � S . � 0 3 -< w � m `c Z a' O � �o N n • � O a Z m ao ��, v c � � < °' m m '^ Z � .`�' � Q O � , • � O � O N (/) j 61 � � � � � O T r � Z � `D � w a �m - � � � d D � ,..� C. �p C 3 - Z .� � � a o Z C7 Z � � O o °' : �o � � m o 0 ca � -. �y � . Gs m x � � � m � .o � S � �a _ � a m � � ] < Q H N = m �Q � N . � • C `�C 37 � _ � � o = �p S ... � � N y t0 0 3 Q . �' 0 n �� `n � w N N C � N t � w m � � � � � N � m � o �p � _ � c � w C � 7 � �f 0. ^ w ,°a m � N o r � Z o�i � o a W � � = �, y ci � n _, �o w � � 21 17R Z Z Z o d m � m � N • O O � Q C � C � > > (%� • N � � � � � O � � 1D Z7 S rD N ? Q N Q N � C ... a _ v Z C a+ °' � 2 �o o � � v, .r o � W . < n �p T W �o n Z � o � T � N O A 91 �. � . � O � "C � g = - v ry •� Z m � p � $ � N n � O az n o � o v c .� o < d ? u� m a+ Z `.� � Q O � • � O � O N (n j 4/ � � � -� � O �... � T �p Z CD � N d � a : m � � � � D � _.{ a �D C � _ jv ` o N Z 0 Z � � o c w . eo � = � o 0 es � -. m o � x � � � � � � ? � � - m o y �o � � Q y N � � � � N � • C "C 9 '� � � W o = � A _ cSi u• •.. N 0 3 - a. . �' o• D c N N � N H C � N � � N /D � � �c m o tn -� ' o � `° � T C /D N C � � 7 � n d � w „°,' m � � y o r � Z d ci o a �p � O = °i w ca � a ^ � d � �. 5�91 r _ � . Community Development Department G DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: August 8,'1991 � TO: William Burns, City Manager�� FROM: Barbara Dacy, _Community Development Director Lisa Campber.��lanning Associate SUBJECT: Resolution to Receive $25,000 in 1991-92 Coon Rapids' Community Development Block Grant Funds and Pledging to Return Those Funds in 1992-93 Fridley Community Development Block Grant Funds or Some Other Monies Early in 1991, staff determined that the City of Fridley would be unable to purchase the final property in the Riverview Heights project area with the level of Community Development Block Grant funds allocated for 1991-92. Staff consulted with Anoka County staff, JoAnn Wright, who suggested that we could request a"trade" in funds from a city that had unallocated funds or delay the purchase of the property until 1992-93. � The City of Fridley approached the City of Coon Rapids with a request for a trade of $25,000 in 1991-92 Coon Rapids' Community Development Block Grant funds for the same amount of 1992-93 Fridley Community Development Block Grant funds. On August 6, 1991, the Coon Rapids' City Council agreed to this "trade" under the condition that the City of Fridley resolve to return those funds in 1992 and execute a memorandum of understanding. These documents are attached for your consideration. Requested Action Staff requests that authorize the Mayor of understanding. LC:ls M-91-584 the City Council approve the resolution and and the City Manager to execute the memorandum RESOLUTION NO. - 1991 RESOLUTION TO RECEIVE $25,000 IN 1991-92 COON RAPIDS� COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCR GRANT FUNDS AND PLEDGING TO RETURN THOSE FIINDS IN 1992-93 FRIDLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCR GRANT FUNDS OR OTHER MONIES WHEREAS, Anoka County, Minnesota, has been designated as an Urban County by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; and WHEREAS, Anoka County, Minnesota, receives an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development as a result of the Urban County designation; and WHEREAS, all local governmental units in Anoka County receive a share of the Community Development Block Grant funds for eligible activities; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has allocated a share of its 1991-92 Community Development Block Grant funds for blighted property acquisition and needs an additional $25,000 for this project; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has requested that the City of Coon Rapids reallocate $25,000 of its 1991-92 unexpended Community Development Block Grant funds to Fridley; and WHEREAS, the City of Fridley agrees to reimburse the City of Coon Rapids by July 2, 1992, from the City of Fridley's 1992-93 Community Development Block Grant funds or other monies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, that the City of Fridley will accept $25,000 in unexpended 1991-92 Coon Rapids' Community Development BZock Grant funds. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Fridley will repay the City of Coon Rapids $25,000 from its 1992-93 Community Development Block Grant funds or other monies by July 1, 1992. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1991. ATTEST: SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK : �, WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING THE RE�ALLOCATION OF 525,000 OF UNEXPENDED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FROM THE � CITY OF COON RAPIDS TO T'�� CITY OF FRIDLEY WHEREAS, the Gty of Fridley roquested that the Qty of Coon Rapids reaUocatc 525,000 of its uncxpcndad 1991-1992 Community D�velopmcnt Block Grant funds to the City of Fridley, and; . WHEREAS, the CSty of Coon Rapids, through Resolution 91-79, approvr.d th� reallocation of �25,000 of une�g�ended 1991-1992 Community Development Block Grant funds to the Gty of Fridley. NOW, 'I'HEREFORE, in consideration of thoir respective actions, the City of Coon Rapids and the City of Fridley mutually agree as follows: � • 1. The City of Coon Rapids accepts the pledge from tho G�ty of Fridley to transfer $25,000 of its 1992•1993 Block Grant allocation to the City of Coon Rapids as repayment of the 525,000 of 1991-1992 Block Grant funds reallocated to the City of Fridley by the Caty of Coon Rapids. 2. In the event of reduction or elimination of the City of Fridley's 1992-1993 Community Development Block Grant allocation, the City of Fridley shall cause repayment of the S25,000 to be made to the City of Coon Rapids from other sources avalable to the C�ity of Fridley. 3. Repaymcnt of thc 525,000 to the Caty of Coon Rapids by the City of Fridley shall be made by July 1, 1992. CITY OF COON RAPIDS Richard S. Reiter Mayor Date: Robert L. Svehla City Manager Date• ._ CITY OF FRIDLEY Mayor Date: Gty Manager Date: � � _ J City of Fridley Recreation & Natural Resource Department 6431 University Avenue NE, Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Phone # 612-572-3570 Fax # 612-571-1287 August 8, 1991 ��_ TO: William W. Burns � City Manager �� FR: Jack Kirk �_ Director RE: SPRINGBROOR NATIIRE CENTER LANDSCAPING & ENTRANCL AREA PROJBCT In May of this year bids were received for a landscaping and entrance�area project at Springbrook Nature Center. All bids were significantly higher than the available funds for that project and bids were rejected at that time. It was recommended that staff make adjustments to the plan and re-bid the project in the Fall in time for the Fall planting season. Staff has made revisions in the landscaping and planting plan and we are now ready to proceed with the project. The overall plan combines funds remaining in the tornado restoration project, the previously scheduled irrigation system in the entrance area, landscaping around the new parking lot, and tornado restoration donations received by the Springbrook Nature Center Foundation. The Tornado Restoration Project funds ($12,680) and the irrigation system dollars ($4,824) are encumbrances from the 1988 Naturalist Division budget. Landscaping of the new parking lot area is in the 1991 Capital Improvements Program, Parks Improvement area with an established amount of $7,000. The Springbrook Nature Center Foundation has raised funds for tornado restoration at the park and will contribute $2,500 towards this landscaping project. This provided a total available funds of just over $27,000 to complete this project. I recommend that City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the advertising for bids on the Springbrook Nature Center Landscaping Project. We would expect to bring the bid results and recommendation to City Council for the Monday, September 9, 1991 City Council meeting. This schedule would allow completion of this project during the Fall plan�ing season. JK: sj 19 �--'f.�' � __/ �1 •. � � • • r• ��.-�. r� .. :;��•�r � �� . � o- . . . .,. • . ��. � � •,�u;�� •� tia �� ;� : ��. � • � r,: �,� � • n ��•� «� Y�• • ��. v. . � ..,� 5N . . T��'AS, A tornado in 1986 destrayed m�ost of the tree� azx3 shrubs in the entranae area of Spririgbrook Nature Centex, and �S, the City Council of the City of Fridley has allocated funds to restore tornado damaged areas within Sprirx�rook Nature Center arid to laridscape the entratx�e area, NOW, �Cd7E, B� IT R'�OI�7ID, by the City �auici.l of the City of FridleY, Anoka (�inty, Minnesota, as follaws: l. That the Spririgbrook Nature Center entran�oe area rec�caraneryded for Z�P�! bY' the Naturalist/Re.so�zroe C'oordirlator be landscaP�, and the work irivolved in said improvement shall hereaftex be designated as: yw: i�.r,::.� � ; .�: l 1:r s+o-��r�; : �I�._vo ��.. .:,� ta.y . . 2. The plans and specifications prepared for Springbrook Nature C7�nter for such impravement and each of them, F�suant to the Cotuzcil action heretofore, are hereby ap�raved and shall be filed with the City Clerk. c - . . .- .- . _. � .- •• 1 r,:•,��' ►� �� r�� n.v • 1 ..,• 7 • • .- .- . � a. i . - . - .. The Naturalist/Resource Coordinator shall ac�cordirigly prepare arxi cause to be insert.ed in the official riewspaper advertisemerit for bids �on the making of such impravemer�ts wZder surh appraved plans and specifications. The advertisemant shall be published for two (2) weeks (at least 10 days), and shall specify the work to be done aryd wi.11 state that bids will be opened at 11:00 A.M. on AIT�T 29 1991, in the City Ha].1, and that no bids will be considex�ed unless sealed and filed with the Naturalist/R�e.source cbordinator and aa�ampanied by a cash deposit, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City of Fridley for five perc�nt (5%) of the amount of such bid. 7�at the advertisement for bids for I�ZiIRE t�Nffi2 PR47E7GT 1991 sh�all be substantially standard in form. •. �+� � � •�� : �i w •r w� � ri « • �n �� • r •• [+.��i�i�u!`�� Z'�7 ATI'EST: �� ►.... �. 19A NO�1'ICE 'I�0 BIDDF.RS (RE'VISID 8-12-91) ' i H: `,� • ' I• �I:�i yl' I�� M� • � " •.• } Sealed bids will be reoeived aryd publicly apened by the City of Fridley, Anaka C7ounty, Minnesota, at the Fridley Municipal Cent�x, 6431 Univexsity Av+e, N.E. FYidley, Minnesota, 55432, (Te1. 571-3450) aa1 the 29th day of At�gust 1991 at 11: 00 A.M. for the fi?rn? sh� ng of wr�rk ar�d materi.als for the City of FYidley Springbrook Nature Center I�ndscapinq Proiect. This project csonsists of the follawir�g principal items of w�rk ar�d approximate quantities. 28 Deciduaus 2� (variaus species) 16 Cbniferaus Z�ees (variaus species) 182 Shrubs (varivus species) 100 cu. yards of topsoil Irrigation system installatian All in a000rdance with plans and specificatiar�s on file with the Naturalist/R�esource Coordinator, City of Fridley, 6431 University Ave,nue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota 55432 (Tel. 571-3450). Plans and specifications may be examined at Springbroak Nature Cenfi�.ex, located at 100 85th Avenue N.E., FYidley, Minnesota. �ies may be abtained for the oontractors iixlividual use fro�n the Naturalist/Resaurce Coordinator. Bids must be made on the basis of cash payment for work, ar�d aoow�anied by a ca_�h deposit, cextified check (on a responsible bank in the State of Minnesata) or a bidder's bond made payable with�t c�ondition to the City of Fridley, Mir�nesota, in an amount of not less than five peroent (5$) of the total ama�mt of the bid. Zhe City Council reserves the right tA rej ect ariy and all bids arxl to waive arYy informalities in any bids received without explanation. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days. By order of the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota. Dated this 12th day of August 1991. Published: FYidley Focu.s August 14, 1991 AugiLSt 22, 1991 . - ►/� k l. : `�1 /: �. � 1.��1 �� , � ��_ • ' 0 MEMORANDUM - Municipal Center '_ 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 CINOF (612) 572-3507 F�IX-� FAX: (612) 571-1287 Willlam C. Hunt Assistant to the City Manager Meaio To: William W. Burns, City Manaqer k�•� , �!` From: William C. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manaqer�' 8ubject: Amendment to Historical 8ociety Loan Repayment Schedule Date: July 24, 1991 The Fridley Historical Society has requested the forgiveness of the first $700.00 payment of the loan made to them by the City of Fridley in 1989. The Fridley City Council has expressed its interest in rescheduling the payments, and I have attached a draft resolution for consideration by the Council at their meeting of August 12, 1991. I would appreciate your presenting this matter to the Council for their decision. WCH/jb Attachment RESOLIITION NO. - 1991 A RESOLIITION AMENDING THE REPAYMENT SCHEDIILE OF A LOAN TO THE FRIDLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY WHEREAS, on June 19, 1989, by Resolution No. 54 - 1989 the Fridley City Council authorized a no interest loan of $7,000.00 to the Fridley Historical Society to assist in the renovation of the former Hayes Elementary School to serve as a historical museum, a project which has cost approximately $85,000; and WHEREAS, according to Resolution No. 54 - 1989 one tenth (1/10) of the total amount of the loan shall be payable on the anniversary of the final payment by the City of Fridley in each of the subsequent ten (10) years; and WHEREAS, the final payment by the City of Fridley was made on July 19, 1990, so that the first $700.00 repayment was due on July 19, 1991; and WHEREAS, in a letter dated May 15, 1991, the Fridley Historical Society requested that the Fridley City Council forgive the first loan repayment of $700.00; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to assist the Fridley Historical Society in the work of preserving the historical records of the City of Fridley for future generations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley that the repayment schedule be amended as follows: One tenth (1/10) of the total amount of the loan shall be payable on the second anniversary of the final payment by the City of Fridley and on the same anniversary in each of the subsequent nine (9) years. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1991. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK 20A l -� .._ • r� A t•OYtiG� OGi�L MAY 2 0 �991 �� [J �,:., 4;,,, 611 Mississippi Street N.E. � _ Fn.i.d,�.ey, µtnnedoza 55432 May 15, 1991 1� ' The Honorable William Nee The Honorable Nancy Jorgenson The Honorable Steve Billings The Honorable Dennis Schneider The Honorable �dward Fitzpatrick Fridley Municipal Center 643� University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Nn 55432 Dear Members of the Fridley City Council: On July 19, 1990 the Fridley City Council granted to the.Fridley Historical Society a$�7000 n0-interest-loan to be paid back in a ten yeax period. The first payment of $700 is due on July 1g. This money has been used for landscapping. To date the Fridley Historical Society has spent y�85,000 renovating the Historical Museum and making it handicapped accessable. Our experience in fund raising has been disappointing. The Fridley Historical Society raises money throu gh memberships (individual and businesses), fund raisers such as bake sales and lasagna dinners, and grants from local service groups. We have been under considerable expense this year with the finishing of a downstairs meeting room. Ther�fore, I am requesting that the Fridley City Council forgive the first payment of �700. The Fridley Historical Society is very grateful for the support we have received from the Council. We would appreciate your serious consideration and favorab_le decision on this request. Thank you. 1: Sincerely, C��-� ��"j . Char Fitzpatrick, President Fridley Historical Society 21 � � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL �D�EY Auaust 12. 1991 � Type of License: B,L BOTTLE CLUB Knights of Columbus John Yencho 6831 Nwy. 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 TEMPORARY ON SALE BEER Fridley Jaycees Lori Wosmek P.O. Box 20008 Fri dl ey, P�1N 55432 CIGARETTE Grocery Hut #2 Ken Jednegil 1301 Mississippi St. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 OFF SALE BEER Grocery Hut #2 Ken Jednegil 1301 Mississippi St.N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 RETAIL GASOLINE Grocery Hut #2 Ken Jednegil 1301 P�lississippi St.N.E. Fri d 1 ey, P�1N 55432 23 Approved By• LICENSES James P. Hill Public Safety Director Fees: $300.00 James P. Hill Asking Fees Public Safety Dir.: : to be waived James P. Hill Public Safety Director James P. Hill Public Safety Director Richard Larson Fire Inspector $12.00 $60.00 $60.00 � � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL GAS SERVICES Swenson Heating & Air Cond 6700 West Broadway Brooklyn Park MN 55428 Master Mobile Home Service 2189 Long Lake Rd New Brighton, MN 55112 Midwest Equipment Co Inc 300 University Ave W St Paul, MN 55103 GBNERAL CONTRACTOR Aladdin Pools Inc 3901 Central Ave NE Columbia Heights MN 55421 C & M Construction RT 1 BoX 138 Exeland, WI 54835 Eden Construction 150 E 107th St Circle Bloomington MN 55420 Handyman Helpers P].us Inc 1821 Glenwood Minneapolis MN 55405 New Spaces Home Craftsman 15025 Stevens Ave S Brunsville, MN 55337 Q & M Enterprises 598 Dayton Ave St Pau1MN 55103 River Road Investors 7841 Wayzata Blvd Minneapolis MN 55426 Roto-Rooter Service Co 14530 27th Ave N Plymouth, MN 55447 Samuelson, L.W. Const Inc 7800 East River Rd Fridley, Mn 5�5432 Douglas Swenson Barry Fassett Richard Johnson S E Thayer Mike Bodner Gary Stoecker Mark Price Douglas Nelson Richard Young Jr Bryant Belgarde Phil Roehrich L. W. Sam�elson 23A LICEN8E8 CLYDE WILEY Bldg/Mech Insp Same Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same James Steele Construction Co 1410 Sylvan Street St Paul, MN 55117 Daniel McKay HEATING Swenson Heating & Air Cond 6700 W Broadway Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Marsh Heating & A/C Co 6248 Lakeland Ave N Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Midwest Equipment Co Inc 300 University Ave W St Paul, MN 55103 Whole Air Co. Inc. 16850 Hwy 10 Elk River, MN 55330 MA.SONRY Unique Concrete 1210 5th Avenue Isanti, MN 55040 MOBILE HOME INSTALT•� Star Mfg Homes Inc 9550 Hwy 65 NE Blaine, MN 55434 PLUI�ING Cichy's Water & Sewer Co. 5324 - 41st Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55417 Crosstown Plumbing Inc. 16530 - 105th Ave N Maple Grove, MN 55369 Laney's Plumbing Inc 4431 Lynx Ct Eagan, MN 55121 Douglas Swenson Larry Marsh Richard Johnson Glen Heggem Daniel Deose Marty Pemper Timothy Cichy Alvin Tonn Steve Laney Sutherlund Plumbing & Heating Inc. 3864 Edith Lane Lexington, MN 55014 Howard Sutherlund ROOFING Hal Brennen Shingler 11011 Anderson Lakes Pkwy #314 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Hal Brennen 23B Same CLYDE WILEY Bldg/Mech Insp Same Same Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl STATE OF MINN STATE OF MINN Same Same Same DARREL CLARK Chief Bldg Ofcl APPROVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR 23C '� FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ESTIMATES ��p(.� AIIGIIST 12 , 19 9 91 Herrick & Newman 205 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Services Rendered as City Attorney through the end of June, 1991 . . . . . . . . . $ 1,113.50 State of Minnesota Commissioner of Transportation Financial Operations 461 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55103 S.P. 0207-54 Fed. Proj. HES 005-2(97) City Cost Storm Sewer, Walk and Pavement Construction by the State at the T.H. 65 and 53rd Avenue N.E. Intersection Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22,554.77 W.B. Miller, Inc. 16765 Nutria Street Ramsey, MN 55303 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1991 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 34, 725. 83 24