08/26/1991 - 5107OFFICIAL CITY COIINCIL AGENDA
COONCIL MEETING
AIIGOST 26� 1991
J`
'
un�or
FRIDLEY
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING
ATTENDENCE SHEET
Mon�ay, August 26, 19�1
7:30 P.M.
PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS
ITEM
NUMBER
'�
_ FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL
FRI�pL.�E.y 1�iUGIIBT 2 6, 19 91
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
APPROVAL OF MINIITEB:
City Council Meeting of August 12, 1991
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
OPEN FORUM. VISITORB:
(Consideration of items not on agenda - 15 minutes)
Presentation by Kenneth G. Wilkinson, Anoka County Sheriff
PUBLIC HEARING:
Rezoning Request, ZOA #91-01, by
Mark Kvalheim of Bailey Enterprises,
Inc., to Rezone from R-3, General
Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General
Business, on Lot 17, Block 5, and
the South 7.3 Feet of Lot 16,
Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South
Addition, Generally Located at
203-205 Mississippi Street N.E . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1V
�K1�L�1 L11i L'C7UrL1L il5allr� V� AUVU�1 ld� 1991 PaQe Z
OLD BOSINE88:
Second Reading of an Ordinance
Amending Section 2.03.07 of the
Fridley City Charter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - 2A
First Reading of an Ordinance
Under Section 12.07 of the
City Charter to Vacate Streets
and Alleys and to Amend
Appendix C of the City Code
(Vacation Request, SAV #91-01,
by Eugene and Jean Hagberg;
Tabled 8/12/91) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3Y
NEW BIISINESS:
Presentation of the I992
Preliminary Draft Budgets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 4C
Set Public Hearing for November 18,
1991, on the City of Fridley 1992
i�uciyet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5A
Resolution Certifying �'Proposed"
Tax Levy Requirements for 1992
to the Ca�nty of Anoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6A
r�iuLZS �ias VvurV1L a��1'trv V� AUGU�1 Z6� 1991 Paqe 3
NEW BOSINE88 (CONTINIIED):
Resolution Adopting a "Proposed"
Budget for the Fiscal Year 1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7B
Resolution Approving a Second
Supplemental Indenture of Trust
and a First Amendment to Loan
Agreement R�specting the City's
Commercial Development Revenue
Bonds (Fridley Business Plaza
Limited Partnership Project) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8F
Motion to Appoint Fridley Residents
to the Fric�ley Senior Citizens Center
Task Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
First Reading of an Ordinance Under
Section 12.07 of the City Charter to
:'uc��� ��r�et� and Alleys and to
Amend Appendix C of the City Code
(Vacation Request, SAV #91-03, by
William Pickering) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - l0A
Approve Comprehensive Sign Plan
for Osborne Crossings located at
250 Osborne Road N.E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 - 11C
r�iLLZS �iss �vvr�1L i�ar.�'rlrv vF wu�uai LO� lyyl raqe {
NEW HIISINE88 (CONTINIIED):
Award Contract for Skywood Lane
Water Extension Project No. 220 . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 22A
Approval of Change Order No. 2
for Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1991 - 1 & 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13F
Approval of 1992 Six Cities
Watershed Management Organization
Budget for 1992 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14B
Motion to Reschedule the December 16,
1991, Fridley City Council Meeting
to December 9, 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Resolution Authorizing Certain
Positions as Permanent for the
Purpose of Inclusion under the
Provisions of Chapter 3 of the
Code of C�ty Ordinances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16C
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETiNa OF AIIG�ST 26, 1991 Paqe 5
NEW BIISINE88 (CONTINIIED)s
Resolution Authorizing an
Addition to the Contract of
the City Manager to Allow for
Reimbursement of Annual Leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Znformal Status Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Claims . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 - 20I
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21G
ADJOIIRN:
THE MINUTES OF THE FRIDLBY CITY COQNCIL MEETING OF
AIIGIIST 12, 1991
THB MINLJTES OF THE REGIILAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF
AIIGIIST 12, 1991
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Councilmembers and audience in the Pledge of
Allegiance.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman
Billings, Councilman Schneider, and Councilman
Fitzpatrick
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING, JULY 22, 1991:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt the agenda as submitted.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
There was no response from the audience under this item of
business.
PUBLIC HEARING•
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION, SAV #91-03, BY WILLIAM PICKERING,
TO VACATE THE SOUTHERLY 20 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 40 FEET OF
A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 11, BLOCK 2,
INNSBRUCK NORTH, GENERALLY IACATED AT 1467 NORTH INNSBRUCK
DRIVE N.E.•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
opened at 7:37 p.m.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AIIGOST 12. 1991 pAGE 2
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a
request to vacate the south 20 feet of a 40 foot drainage and
utility easement at 1467 Innsbruck Drive N.E. She stated that in
1980 the homeowner applied for a building permit to construct a
swimming pool. She stated that it was indicated the pool would be
located outside the 40 foot drainage and utility easement; however,
it was constructed with 10 feet encroaching into the easement. She
stated that the encroachment was discovered at the time the house
was sold.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Engineering Department has reviewed this
request and determined that vacation of this part of the easement
would not have an adverse impact on the function of the easement,
and there is adequate property to handle any runoff. She stated,
however, that they have recommended only a 15 foot vacation to
insure there is adequate space within the easement should any work
need to be performed in this area.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission has recommended
approval of the vacation of 15 feet of the drainage easement.
Councilman Schneider asked if the City has any record of drainage
problems since the pool was constructed.
Ms. Dacy stated that staff is not aware of any problems in this
area.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the pool was inspected by the
City's inspectors.
Ms. Dacy stated that there was an inspection and, in this case,
the setbacks were correct, but the drawing showed that it was not
in the easement.
Councilman Schneider stated that he felt it was also the obligation
of the contractor to make sure the pool is locafed in the proper
place on the site.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 7:43 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS•
2. RESOLUTION NO. 59-1991 IN SUPPORT OF A MINNESOTA LAWFUL
GAMBLING APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM LAWFUL GAMBLZNG
LICENSE TO TOTINO-GRACE HIGH SCHOOL:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 59-1991.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 12. 19g1 PAGE 3
3. RESOLUTION NO. 60-1991 IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A
MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING BINGO HALL LICENSE FOR THE KNIGHTS
OF COLUMBUS•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 60-1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 61-1991 IN SUPPORT OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER TASK FORCE:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the City Councils of Fridley,
New Brighton, Mounds View, and Spring Lake Park are studying the
possibility of establishing a Regional Senior Center Task Force to
decide if a regional senior center should be constructed to serve
the four communities. He stated that this Task Force would be
composed of elected officials and others who have a stake in the
senior center. He stated that a preliminary recommendation would
be submitted by December l, 1991, with a final report expected by
February 15, 1992.
Mr. Burns stated that the Task Force would address the feasibility
of constructing a senior center and, if so, address the issues of
programs, services, site selection, staffing, and funding. He
stated that the Task Force would also make recommendations
regarding the consolidation and/or coordination of services
currently provided by both private and public sector agencies. He
stated that the Task Force shall determine whether or not a
regional senior center shall be established under the authority of
a special district, a joint powers agreement, or some other
arrangement that may be mutually agreeable to the four cities. He
stated that the four city managers/administrators of the cities
involved, or their designees, are to be considered ex officio
members of the Task Force.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 61-1991.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how interested citizens could obtain
information on serving on the Task Force.
Mr. Burns asked that they call his office, as Fridley will have the
largest representation on the Task Force.
5. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.03.07 OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that this Charter
amendment relates to the amount of deviation allowed between wards
upon redistricting. He stated that the amendment would change the
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL M�BTING OF AUGUST 12, 1991 PAGE 4
allowed deviation from one percent to three percent of the average
ward's population.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading and approve
the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
6. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.05 OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that the essence
of this Charter amendment is to change the manner in which
vacancies on the Council are filled. He stated that currently the
Charter allows that if there is one vacancy the Council must hold
an election. He stated that if there are two or more vacancies the
Council has the discretion of increasing the members to four by
means of appointment. iie stated that if there are more than two
vacancies this becomes difficult, as the Charter states the Council
can be increased by a unanimous resolution and, if the Council is
down to less than three members, there would not be a quorum to
adopt a resolution.
Mr. Hunt stated that according to the proposed amendment if a
single vacancy occurs in the first three years of a term an
election would be mandatory. He stated that if it occurs later the
CounciZ can exercise the option of calling an election or filling
the vacancy by appointment. He stated that if the Council is below
two members, the City Manager makes the appointment to raise the
Council to a quorum.
Mr. Hunt stated that several questions were raised when this
proposed amendment was discussed at the last Council meeting. He
stated that one question was if an election should be optional if
a vacancy occurs in the fourth year of a term. He stated that some
felt there should be an election and not an optiori for appointment.
He stated that the issue of a primary was discussed. He stated
that neither the present Charter nor the proposed amendment makes
provision for a primary election. He stated that another issue was
the length of time for conducting the election. It was felt
additional time was needed in order for candidates to file. He
stated that there was a question raised as to why the City Manager
would be the appointing person if the Council was down to two
members.
Councilman Schneider felt that primarily on a single vacancy the
public is best served by an election. He stated that if the length
of time is short between the vacancy and the election he felt it
would be better to leave the seat vacant and fill it at the time
of the election.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AOGUST 12 1991 PAG$-5
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she would agree with Councilman
Schneider's remarks and felt that the public is best served if
vacancies are filled by an election.
Councilman Billings stated that when this proposed amendment was
discussed at the last meeting it was indicated the Charter
Commission would have no objection to reviewing some of the issues
that were discussed.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the first reading and
approve the ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilman
Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voted nay, and Mayor Nee declared
the motion failed by an unanimous vote.
7. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY
CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO AMEND APPENDIX C
OF THE CITY CODE•
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that the City
Council conducted a public hearing at their last meeting on this
alley vacation. She stated that the portion of the alley to be
vacated is 243 feet south of the south line of 59th Avenue,
generally located north of 58th Avenue, south of 59th Avenue, east
of 2nd Street, and west of 2-1/2 Street.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission reviewed this request
at two meetings and recommended denial of this vacation. She
stated that a concern was if 100 percent access could be provided
to the Measner property.
Ms. Dacy stated that the City Attorney and staff have been working
on a number of issues with regard to this vacation request. She
stated that the City Attorney has indicated that he would like to
ask some questions of those persons who live adjacent to the alley
and requested this item be tabled. -
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that this alley is located in
an old plat, and part of the plat showed an alley dividing the
properties. He stated the rule in Minnesota is that when a plat
is filed and streets, alleys, parks, and other public areas are
designated on the plat they serve as a dedication for the easement.
He stated what that means, in this case, is that the area
designated as the alley is reserved for use as an alley and the
easement dedicated for that purpose. He stated that there are
three ways the alley can come into existence. He stated that one
way is for the City to open the alley by improving and maintaining,
but he understands this has not happened in this case. He stated
that another way an alley can come into existence is by common law
usage which requires a number of people to use the easement as an
alley, which was done by the public over an unspecified period of
time. Another way is by adverse possession. He stated that the
common law usage may be the way this alley was established.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 12, 1991 PAGE 6
Ms. Jean Hagberg, 5881 2nd Street, stated that she has lived at
this address since 1964. She stated that the alley has never been
plowed in the winter. She stated that in the summer, once in a
while a car can get through, however, it is pretty overgrown. She
stated that otherwise, there has not been any travel through the
alley.
Mr. Herrick asked if the alley behind Ms. Hagberg's home and to
the south was not physically open until last year.
Ms. Hagberg stated that there is a car that drives through there
once in a while.
Mr. Herrick asked about the use of the alley further south.
Ms. Hagberg stated that just about everyone enters their property
from the street as they have no reason to use the alley. She
stated that Mr. Measner has been using the alley to get to his
property.
Mr. Herrick asked if the prior owners of Mr. Measner's property
used the alley.
Ms. Hagberg stated that she believed they tried to get through
there once or twice. She stated that there was a large tree in the
alley easement which they removed.
Mr. Herrick asked the appearance of the alley and if it looks like
someone's yard.
Ms. Hagberg stated that it is like a road but it is overgrown.
She stated that it was their intention to have the alley vacated
before they filled in the ruts, but they have already done this
work. She stated that they should have had the vacation first and
then filled in the ruts and cut down the tree.
Mr. Herrick asked if Mr. Measner used both the north and south
accesses to the alley.
Ms. Hagberg stated that she uses both accesses. She stated,
however, that she has been advised by her garbage hauler that he
could not get through the alley.
Mr. Herrick stated that to summarize Ms. Hagberg's comments, since
1964 the alley was used only occasionally until Mr. Measner moved
in and has made some use of the alley.
Mr. Measner, 5834 2-1/2 Street, stated that he understands people
have used the alley in the past. He stated that he is confused as
the neighbors at one meeting say they want the alley closed because
of traffic, and at the next meeting they say there has been no
traffic. He stated that he does not really understand the problem.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 12. 1991 PAGE 7
He stated that the alley has been there for years, and he has no
access into his property other than to use the alley.
Mr. Herrick stated he recognizes that Mr. Measner drives to the
rear of his property and asked if he parks his car in the back.
Mr. Measner stated that he does park in the back and would like to
construct a garage. He stated that he checked with City staff if
this was an alley, as there was brush and other things to deter him
from using the alley.
Mr. Herrick stated that the City has not established an alley. He
stated that there is an easement and, depending on how it has been
used in the past, may determine if an alley has been created or
not.
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if the vacation request has any
bearing on whether this is or is not an alley.
Mr. Herrick stated that if the vacation is approved, Council would
clearly be vacating an alley easement. He stated that if it is an
established alley, and if it is vacated and one of the property
owners is damaged, they would be entitled to compensation. He
stated that if an alley has not been established and is vacated,
then he believed that party would not be entitled to compensation.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she drove through the alley, and
it seems to be narrower than 12 feet. She stated that there are
fences on the lot line; however, she was able to get through
without scratching her vehicle. She stated that there is no grass
growing over the ruts so cars are obviously using the alley.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if Council does not vacate the alley
if neighbors could put up fences and prohibit Mr. Measner from
using the alley. -
Mr. Herrick stated that this could be done if the alley is not
established by common law use.
Ms. Cheryl Williamette, 6004 2-1/2 Street, stated that she was the
previous owner of Mr. Measner's property and lived at the property
from 1975 to 1986. She stated that she and her husband used the
alley for five of these years. She stated that they had three
vehicles, and all three could fit into the back yard. She stated
that if a garage were constructed and placed forward on the
property, it would be accessible. She stated that there are
bicycles, motorbikes, and people walking who use the alley. She
stated that the apartment building traffic uses the alley on the
south. She stated that she did not know how long fences have been
established to the north. She stated that the alley has been
blocked with snow occasionally, but she kept it open for five years
she lived there.
FRIDLEY CITY COiJNCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 12, 1991 PAGB 8
Mr. Jerry McNurlin, 250 Sylvan Lane, stated that he owns the
property at 5820 2-1/2 Street and his tenants do use the alley.
He stated that most people exit to the south, but they could exit
to the north. He stated that he did not object to vacating the
alley if the entire alley is vacated. He stated that he did object
to vacating only a portion.
Mr. Herrick asked Mr. McNurlin how long he has owned this apartment
and if he has seen his tenants using the alley.
Mr. McNurlin stated that he has owned the building since 1979, and
he has seen his tenants use the alley.
Ms. Becky Street, 5825 2nd Street, stated that she has not noticed
much traffic on the south end of the alley. She stated that if
Council is going to vacate the alley, the entire alley should be
vacated. She stated that there is a lot of partying that goes on
in the alley, and her main concern is that if only half of the
alley is vacated she will have additional problems behind her
property.
Mr. Herrick asked if she has seen some use of the alley since 1989.
Ms. Street stated that she has used the alley several times
herself.
Ms. Judy Konsela, 5828 2-1/2 Street, stated that she has lived at
this address for eight years, and there is traffic through the
alley all the time.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to table this item until a
recommendation is received from the City Attorney. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
8. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
JULY 13, 1991•
A. ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING FOR AUGUST 26, 1991 FOR A REZONING
ZOA #91-01, BY MARK KVALHEIM OF BAILEY ENTERPRISES INC TO
REZONE_FROM R-3, GENERAL MULTIPLE DWELLING �TO C-2 GENERAL
BUSINESS, ON LOT 17, BLOCK 5, AND THE SOUTH 7 3 FEET OF
LOT___16, BLOCK 5, RICE CREEK PLAZA SOUTH ADDITION GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 203-205 MISSISSIPPI STREET N.E.:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the public hearing on this
rezoning, ZOA #91-01, for August 26, 1991. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive the minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting of July 13, 1991. Seconded by
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 12 1991 PAGE 9
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
9. RECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF
JULY 9. 1991•
A. VARIANCE RE UEST VAR #91 19 BY RANDALL OLCHEFSKE OF
RIVERSIDE AUTO WASH INC TO REDUCE THE RE4UIRED FRONT YARD
SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 10 FEET, TO ALLOW THE EXTENSION AND
ENCLOSURE OF A CANOPY ON TRACT D REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
NO. 19 THE SAME BEING 6520 EAST RIVER ROAD N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a
request for a variance to reduce the required front yard setback
from 35 feet to 10 feet for the property at 6520 East River Road
N.E. She stated that the petitioner received a special use permit
for expansion of a car wash facility in April of 1991 and a
variance to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 19 feet
in conjunction with the car wash expansion.
Ms. Dacy stated that when the petitioner was preparing for
construction of the addition, he discovered there was petroleum
contamination of the soil, and he would be required to remove the
petroleum tanks and install monitoring equipment under Pollution
Control Agency regulations. She stated the petitioner has
determined that he would be unable to replace the petroleum tanks
due to excessive cost, and he re-evaluated his original addition
plans. She stated that the petitioner has now decided he will not
need the canopy which was located over the petroleum tanks and
would prefer to accommodate the window washing and interior
cleaning within this canopy area. She stated that a variance is
needed in order to enclose the canopy area.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Appeals Commission recommended approval
of the variance, as they felt there was not any interruption to the
sight lines, as the elevation is higher than Mississippi Way. She
stated they also added a stipulation that the petitioner contact
the Rice Creek Watershed District to determine if a permit is
necessary. She stated that this has been done, and no permit is
required.
Mr. Olchefske stated it was found that there was soil contamination
on the site and to replace the petroleum tanks would cost $70,000.
He stated that he decided, therefore, not to sell gasoline, and the
tanks have been removed and the soil corrected. He stated that
about 80 percent of their car wash customers want full service, and
he did not feel he could stay in business without providing this
service. He stated that they will not have the advantage of
selling gas but felt some profits could be made by offering a full
service car wash.
FRIDLEY CITY COtTNCIL MEETING OF AOGUST 12, 1991 PAGE 10
Councilman Billings asked how many variances were issued for this
property in prior years.
Ms. Dacy stated that the only one she is aware of is the one issued
last year. She stated that in looking at the site plan she would
estimate there were parking variances along Mississippi Street.
Councilman Billings stated that when he was a member of the
Planning Commission there was a request before them regarding this
property; however, he could not recall the details.
Mr. Olchefske stated he felt that issue was the rezoning for the
car wash. He stated that he did not recall any other variance.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to concur with the recommendation
of the Appeals Commission and grant Variance Request, VAR #91-19.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Councilman Billings asked the stated hardship for this variance
request and if this falls under the guidelines of the Minnesota
statute.
Ms. Dacy stated that Mr. Olchefske has submitted a letter outlining
the hardships.
Councilman Billings questioned if economic reasons were a basis for
a hardship.
Ms. Dacy stated it is her understanding that economic reasons are
not a basis of a hardship for a variance.
Councilman Billings stated Mr. Olchefske's letter indicates that
it is not economically feasible to invest in new petroleum tanks.
He questioned if a variance can be issued under these
circumstances.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Appeals Commission's recommendation was
based on the intent that the front yard setback was to protect the
sight lines, but because the car wash was higher than the street,
enclosing the canopy would not adversely affect the sight lines.
Mr. Olchefske stated although his letter states that it is not
economically feasible to invest in new petroleum tanks, the fact
is he needs the variance in order to remain in business. He stated
that there is not another car wash in Fridley that offers full
service. He stated that everything evolves around the economy, but
he is not claiming that as an issue here. He stated that even
though the tanks could not be installed because of the cost, the
variance is needed for survival of his business.
Councilman Billings asked what functions of the business would be
conducted in the enclosed area.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 12, 1991 PAGB 11
Mr. Olchefske stated that this area would be used for vacuuming the
interiors of vehicles and washing windows. He stated that unless
he is able to enclose the area he cannot function as a full service
car wash, as the window washing has to be done in an enclosed area.
He stated that the car wash is only a single lane and, with only
a single exit, there is no room to stop and vacuum the cars and
wash windows.
Mr. Olchefske stated that there is an area for customers to wait,
and there will be some merchandise for sale such as floor mats and
air fresheners. He stated that they would also sell refreshments
such as coffee, pop, donuts, etc.
Councilman Billings stated that he did not feel there was a clear
hardship as defined under Minnesota statutes.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the fact that Mr. Olchefske may not
be able to retain his business constitutes a hardship. Ms. Dacy
replied in the negative.
Mayor Nee stated that this site is unique, and there is a strange
configuration of the lot.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, Councilman
Fitzpatrick, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider and Mayor
Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Billings voted
against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4
to 1 vote.
10. APPROVAL OF HOUSE TRAILER APPLICATION FOR FRIDLEY CONVALESCENT
HOME LOCATED AT 7590 LYRIC LANE N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that a license is
required for placement of a manufactured home if it is not located
in a licensed mobile home park, and the Fridley Convalescent Home
is proposing to locate a house trailer to the east of the existing
facility. She stated that the State has imposed a moratorium on
expansion of nursing home facilities and, therefore, they are not
permitted to expand unless it is below a specified dollar amount.
She stated that the value of placing the trailer on the property
is below this State requirement.
Ms. Dacy stated that the trailer would be used by existing
personnel for a classroom, office, and a therapeutic recreational
area. She stated that it is recommended the license be issued for
three years rather than the one-year period. She stated that an
installation or building permit would be needed for the foundation,
and the Building Division should be provided with the State seal
number.
Ms. Jedlicki, Administrator for the Fridley Convalescent Home,
stated that the trailer is a modular unit that various businesses
FRIDLEY CiTY COtJNCIL MEETING OF AQGIIST 12. 1991 PAG$ 12
are using for additional space. She stated that no additional
employees will be added, but the space is needed to better serve
their clients and employees. She stated that this trailer would
be physically attached to the building by a modular corridor and
would meet all the State and City Building Code requirements.
Councilman Billings asked if the intent is when this is renewed
that another application fee would apply.
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this is an annual fee.
Councilman Billings asked how soon expansion might begin once the
State lifts the moratorium.
Ms. Jedlicki stated that they would apply for a certificate of
need, the State Legislature would have to consider it and,
hopefully, would allow a substantial expansion to accommodate the
residents. She stated that if they are allowed to expand,their
rooms would house two persons rather than three.
Mayor Nee asked if there are plans for landscaping as this trailer
will be facing a residential area.
Ms. Jedlicki stated that their intent is to make it as attractive
as possible.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the house trailer
application for Fridley Convalescent Home with the following
stipulations: (1) renewal of the permit by August 12, 1994; (2)
the petitioner obtain either an installation or building permit for
the foundation; and (3� the petitioner provide the Building
Division with the State seal number. Seeonded by Councilman
Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
11. APPROVAL OF COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN FOR INSURANCE MART IACATED
AT 6875 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this
comprehensive sign plan is for the Insurance Mart. She stated that
one wall sign is proposed on the south of the building. She stated
that the sign is approximately 67 square feet and well within the
limits of the wall signage requirement. She stated that the sign
will have a total of four panels for the tenants in the building,
and staff recommends approval of this sign plan.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation
of staff and approve the comprehensive sign plan for the Insurance
Mart at 6875 Highway 65 N.E. 5econded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COQNCIL MEETING OF AQGIIST 12, 1991 PAQ$ 13
12. RECEIVE BIDS FOR SKYWOOD LANE WATER EXTENSION PROJECT NO. 220:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive the following bids for
Skywood Lane Water Extension Project No. 220:
Planholder
Northdale Construction
14450 Northdale Blvd.
Rogers, MN 55374
Bonine Excavating
12669 Meadowvale Road
Elk River, MN 55330
Meyer Contracting, Inc.
19145 Vassar Street
Forest Lake, MN 55025
Brown & Cris, Inc.
East Frontage Road of I-35
19740 Kenrick Ave.
Lakeville, MN 55044
Volk Sewer & Water
8909 Bass Creek Court
Brooklyn Park, MN 55428
Glendale Contracting, Inc.
3030 Harbor Lane
Plymouth, MN 55447
Penn Contracting, Inc.
1697 Peltier Lake Drive
Centerville, MN 55038
Total Bid
$108,632.00
$123,466.91
$124,645.80
$125,309.05
$130,582.02
$141,929.50
$145,348.65
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
13. RECEIVE PETITION NO. 2-1991 AND AUTHORIZE REMOVAL OF "NO
PARKING BETWEEN 6 P.M. TO 8 P.M." SIGNS ON THE WEST SIDE OF
JEFFERSON STREET (5800 - 5900):
MOTION by Councilman Billings to receive Petition No. 2-1991 and
direct staff to take the appropriate action for removal of these
signs. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 12, 1991 PAG� 14
14. RECEIVE RE4UEST TO RICE CREEK WATERSFiED DISTRICT FOR FINANCIAL
ASSISTANCE IN FUNDING A RIP-RAP PROJECT ALONG A SHARP CURVE
IN RICE CREEK•
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that five residents on
Rice Creek have joined together and submitted a request to the Rice
Creek Watershed District for financial assistance in funding a
rip-rap project along a sharp curve in Rice Creek. He stated that
the Watershed District has an erosion and streambank stabilization
program which provides for one-third funding of approved projects.
Mr. Flora stated that the residents have been working with the
Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District on this project
for a number of years. He stated that the City is involved to a
certain degree in that there is a storm sewer culvert entering the
creek at the eastern end of the project area. He stated that it
is anticipated the cost to the City would be about $5,000 to
incorporate the culvert rip-raping with the project improvements.
Mr. Flora stated it is requested that Council support this request
to the Rice Creek Watershed District.
Mr. Kaufhold, 375 Rice Creek Terrace, stated that the residents
have been working on this proj ect for about four years . He stated
that the County suggested a rip-rap project, but it is very
expensive, and they are requesting financial assistance from the
Rice Creek Watershed District for the project.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, asked if this project would have any
adverse affect on property owners across the creek.
Mr. Flora stated that it would really be a benefit, as it would
stabilize the curve, and there should be less sedimentation.
MoTION by Councilman Billings to support the submission of this
request for financial assistance to the Rice� Creek Watershed
District and that the City be involved in the financial
implications as it pertains to the culvert rip-rap using the Storm
Utility Fund. Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
15. APPROVAL OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANOKA COUNTY AND THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the Community
Development Block Grant Program Agreement with Anoka County.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF AIIGIIST 12. 1991 _ PAG$ 15
16. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE 1991 ANOKA COUNTY SOLID WASTE
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that Council
approved the 1991 Anoka County Solid Waste Joint Powers Agreement
in March, 1991. The term of this agreement was for the first six
months of 1991 and released $40,685.25 in solid waste abatement
funding. She stated that this amendment allows the City to receive
the balance of the S.C.O.R.E. funding, and the agreement would end
at the end of calendar year 1991.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the amendment to the 1991
Anoka County Solid Waste Joint Powers Agreement. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
17. APPROVAL OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE METROPOLITAN
COUNCIL AND THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY (MHFA) TO
PARTICIPATE IN THE RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM FOR 1991:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this
agreement is for the City to participate in the Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency's rental rehabilitation program. She stated that
there has been a lot of interest in the program and recommended
that Council approve the 1991 memorandum of understanding.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the memorandum of
understanding with the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency to participate in the rental rehabilitation
program for 1991. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
18. RESOLUTION NO 62-1991 TO RECEIVE $25 000 IN 1991-1992 COON
RAPIDS COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND PLEDGING TO RETURN
THOSE FUNDS IN 1992-1993 FRIDLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT FUNDS OR OTHER MONIES:
AND
AUTHORIZING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING THE
REALLOCATION OF $25 000 OF UNEXPENDED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FROM THE CITY OF COON RAPIDS TO THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 62-1991.
Seconded by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize the Memorandum of
Understanding for the return of the $25,000 to the City of Coon
Rapids and to be executed cy the Mayor and City Manager. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF AIIGUBT 12, 1991 PAGE 16
19. RESOLUTION NO. 63-1991 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT. APPROVAL OF PLANS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS: SPRINGBROOK NATURE CENTER
LANDSCAPING PROJECT 1991:
Mr. Jack Kirk, Director of Recreation and Natural Resources, stated
that this past spring bids were received for a landscaping and
entrance area project at Springbrook Nature Center. He stated that
all bids were significantly higher than the available funds for
that project and were rejected.
Mr. Kirk stated that the plan has been modified, and it is
requested that Council authorize the improvement, approve plans,
and order the advertising of bids in order that the project may be
completed this fall. He stated that some of the items contained
in the original plan were removed entirely; the area will be
seeded, rather than sodded; the entrance gate was eliminated; and
trees will not be moved. He stated that one of the key items in
the plan is that all trees were reduced in size, and some species
have been replaced with some less expensive ones.
Mr. Kirk stated that, basically, the plan will be the same, but it
is felt the bids should be within the funds available.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 63-1991.
5econded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
20. RESOLUTION NO. 64-1991 AMENDING THE REPAYMENT SCHEDULE OF A
LOAN TO THE FRIDLEY HISTORICAL SOCSETY:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that the Fridley
Historical Society has requested forgiveness of the first $700
payment of the loan made to them by the City. He stated the iritent
is that one-tenth of the $7,000 loan would be payable in 1993, and
on the same anniversary for nine subsequent years so that there
would be a total of ten payments.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 64-1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote four voted
in favor of the motion, Councilman Schneider, Councilwoman
Jorgenson, Councilman Billings, and Mayor Nee. Councilman
Fitzpatrick abstained from voting on the motion. Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried.
21. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there were no informal status
reports.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 12, 19_91 PAGE 17
22. CLAIMS•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize payment of Claim Nos.
38695 through 39017. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
23. LICENSES'
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the licenses as
submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
24. ESTIMATES•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as
submitted:
Herrick & Newman
205 Fridley Plaza Office Building
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Services Rendered as City Attorney
through the end of June, 1991. .......$ 1,113.50
State of Minnesota
Commissioner of Transportation
Financial operations
461 Rice Street
St. Paul, MN 55103
S.P. 0207-54
Fed. Proj. HES 005-2 (97) -
City Cost Storm Sewer, Walk and
Pavement Construction by the
State at T.H. 65 and 53rd
Avenue N.E. Intersection
Partial Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $22,554.77
W.B. Miller, Inc.
16765 Nutria Street
Ramsey, MN 55303
Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1991 - 1& 2
Estimate No. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34,725.83
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 12, 1991 PAGE 18
1991 COUNCIL CALENDAR:
Councilman Billings stated he noted that the National League of
Cities has changed the dates of their conference which conflicts
with the Council's December 16th meeting date. He requested that
staff review the December meetings and report back at the August 26
meeting so changes could be made, if necessary.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of
the Fridley City Council of August 12, 1991 adjourned at 9:21 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
r �
�
I
Community Development Department
vG DrviSION
City of Fridley
�
DATE: August 22, 1991
TO: William Burns Cit Mana er "„'�
. Y g l��
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
PubZic Hearing for a Rezoning Request, ZOA #91-
01, by Mark Kvalheim, Located at 203 - 205
Mississippi Street N.E.
Attached please find the above-referenced staff report. The City
Council set August 26, 1991 as the date for the public hearing.
Staff recommends that the City Council hold the public hearing.
MM/dn
M-91-600
J.M. Lacpinski, D.D.S.
201 MISSISSIPPI N.E.
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
PHONE 574-7505
August 3,1991
Mayor Nee and City Council
Fridley Municipal Center
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley MN. 55432
Dear City Council Members,
I am the owner and occupier of the building at 20i Mississippi which shares
a cammon w�ll with the building 203-205. I understand that the council will
be discussing the rezoning of the building at 203-205 Mississippi Street N.E.
from R-2 to C-2. I believe that the present owners ultimately want to sell the
properry and for the short term would like to lease the vacant space. I think
that proposed tenants are appropriate ones for the building, but if the
zoning is changed then the future use may not be appropriate for the
location. 1 am opposed to this change in zoning. Once the zoning is
changed the council will lose control of the type of business that can move
into the building.
Yours truly,
. M. L nski D.D.S.
yA
���
v �
s �9s
�
� STAFF REPORT
APPEALS DATE
���QF PLANNING COMMISSION DATE : Juiy 24, 1991
F��i.� CITY COUNCIL DATE : August 12, 1991 Au�� M�/dn
u
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION
SITf DAT�A
SIZE
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
& ZONING
UTILff1ES
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
COMPATIBIL(TY WITH
ADJACENT USES 8� ZONING
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
ZOA �� 9 1-O 1
Mark Kvalheim
To rezone from R-3, General Multiple Dwelling to C-2,
General Business
203 - 205 Mississippi Street N.E.
6,750 square feet 28% lot coverage
R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling
R-2, Two Family Dwelling to the N; C-3, General Shopping
Center to the E and S; R-3, General Multiple Family
Dwelling to the W.
Denial
Approval
Staff Report
ZOA #91-01, Mark Kvalheim
Page 2
REQUEST
The petitioner is proposing to rezone a portion of Lot 17, Block
5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition from R-3, General Multiple
Family Dwelling to C-2, General Business, the same being 203 - 205
Mississippi Street N.E. The petitioner is attempting to locate a
consignment retailer in the building. The proposed tenant will be
renting approximately 2,000 square feet of building area.
SITE
The subject parcel is located at the northeast corner of the
intersection of Mississippi and 2nd Streets. Located�-on the
property is a two story office building which shares a common wall
and lot line with the adjacent building addressed 201 Mississippi
Street. Adjacent properties are zoned R-2, Two Family Dwelling to
the north; C-2, General Shopping Center to the east and south; and
additional R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling to the west.
HISTORY
The property has been zoned R-3, General Multiple Family since
1958. At that time, a building permit was issued to build the
building at 201 Mississippi Street. The City Council approved a
special use permit to allow the building to be used as a dental
clinic, as required by the 1958 zoning code (see attached 1958 City
Council minutes, and 1955 zoning code). Also, Lot 17 had not been
divided. In 1959, a building permit was issued to construct the
203-205 Mississippi Street addition. At that time, a lot split
occurred which split Lot 17 into the subject parcel and the
remaining parcel. The parcels have been divided as such since that
time. Since 1958-59, the uses within the building have been of
the office nature, specifically dental and medical offices.
ANALYSIS
In analyzing the rezoning request, three criteria need to be
evaluated: district use, district intent, and whether or not the
parcel meets the district requirements. The proposed use of the
consignment retailing is consistent and compatible with the
proposed zoning district of C-2, General Business. In addition,
the C-2 zoning district would be compatible with the adjacent C-3
zoning district and uses.
Staff analyzed the subject parcel, the 201 Mississippi Street
parcel, and both parcels as a single unit to determine if any or
all of the parcels would meet the minimum requirements of the C-2,
General Business and CR-1, General Office District regulations.
1C
Staff Report
ZOA #91-01, Mark Kvalheim
Page 3
The CR-1 regulations were also reviewed as the uses allowed under
the special use permit issued in 1958 would fall under this zoning
district category. The result of staff's analysis is displayed in
Exhibit A. Reviewing Exhibit A, it can be noted that there would
need to be several setback and parking variances granted in order
to bring the property into conformance with the district
requirements for both the CR-1 and C-2 districts. Specifically,
the parcels cannot meet the minimum parking requirements; they can
only provide from 1/2 to 1/3 of the required parking. Based on the
determination that the parcel cannot meet the zoning district
requirements, staff recommends the Planning Commission deny the
rezoning request.
Although the property does not meet the minimum requirements for
both the CR-1 and C-2 district regulations, staff recommends that
the proposed uses for the subject parcel continue to be regulated
by the CR-1 regulations. The City Attorney has determined that in
cases of nonconforming zoning patterns such as the subject parcel,
allowing the CR-1 district regulations to regulate these types of
parcels is appropriate (see memo from Virgil Herrick, City
Attorney, dated August 27, 1990).
The Planning Commission should be aware that the owner of the
consignment business will be in attendance at the meeting. Both
she and the petitioner may request that the Planning Commission and
City Council make a determination that the consignment use is
similar to the uses in the CR-1 district. Reviewing the permitted
uses in the CR-1 district, the proposed use is not similar to a
professional office or health care service. Items are sold/traded
and the use is commonly located in retail areas and shopping
centers.
RECOMMENDATION AND STIPULATIONS
As the property does not meet the requirements of the C-2 zoning
district, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend
denial of the zoning request to the City Council. Future uses of
the subject parcel can continue to be regulated by the CR-1
district requirements.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission voted 3-2 to recommend approval of the
request to the City Council. The Commission conditioned their
approval on the petitioner obtaining a cross-parking easement for
nine spaces from the adjacent Holly Shopping Center.
ll_!�
Staff Report
ZOA #91-01, Mark Kvalheim
Page 4
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council deny the rezoning request,
as the property does not meet the requirements of the C-2 zoning
district.
�E
.
�
��
�
205.16 CR-1 GENERAL OFFICE DISTRICT REGULATIONS
1. USES PERMITTED
03/91
A. Principal Uses.
The following are principal uses in CR-1 Districts:
(1) Professional office facilities including real estate,
lawyer, architectural, engineering, financial, insurance and
other similar office uses. (Ref. 888)
(2) Health care services including medical, dental,
optometrist, chiropractic and counseling clinics. (Ref. 888)
B. Accessory Uses.
The following are accessory uses in CR-1 Districts:
(1) Signs.
(2) Off-street parking facilities.
(3) Off-street loading facilities.
(4) Storage of inerchandise, solely intended to be retailed by
the principal use. .
(5) Solar energy devices as an integral part of the principal
structure.
C. Uses Permitted With A Special Use Permit.
The follocaing are uses permitted with Special Use Permits in CR-1
Districts:
(1) Wind generators and other tower mounted energy devices.
f2) Solar energy devices NOT an integral part of the principal
structure.
(3) Exterior storage of materials and equipment.
(4) Day Care Centers.
(a) At least one (1) off-street parking space shall be
provided for each 100 square feet of useable day care
fioor area.
(b) Reduction of parking spaces may be allowed when
provision of space required for parking stalls, due to
the particular nature of the proposed use or other
considerations, would be an unnecessary hardship.
Adequate open space shall be provided to satisfy the total
number of required parking spaces.
1F
205.16.01.
CR-1
DISTRICT
REGULATIONS
USES
PERMITTED
./
205.CR1-1
I � s .�
� o y
� b �
c
� � �
�
°' �' a
m ;.
s�. .� 'q
'S ow �
l v � �Y
N � :=
� a�
3 � °;
���
C C � �V
_. s co aV°
id
.�
E
E
�
.�
a
� r
c. y
00 d
C :r
y �
�
� y �
�
p ��
���
a � o0
�� N
� 'O Q
a��
°' °�„' «
E �� 'c:
� v� u
o�=�oai a`�ia�',
�.�•�,�� �,w
� ae.o �cs
C .C�' s.' .., p. 'p �
� vl Oi G � � c�•
°rd='°°1 m�
e, 'd °ti' r � s p°, �a
3 b0 d+' m+-' t. 'O
'° >+ °' ... � a=
F� �� ��> � "
o ca . .., ax,
H�+�.+� � 00 � �
� m .� ;� � � �
��r[�•�.� a�
�o os:g � � A,
� � � 00 M,� Q X
� a c �S 3 � c�
� = C � y" 'n i� .� a+ �"
•' v O CC � � •.. 'C .... C
L y V = �
�= �� S�� C� v O
a+ 7 G V� t �, �-1
7 � � y � � f+ �
� a[ a°'c � �' °
� �
aui ° v .
ai C �^.. �
'^ v�i L, �� 7^� U y w
a� � O y� V�� Q
i. t.
� � d � � O d � '� � .f;
oec��•���ay
5s o >4. '° e
t., m p O'C7 y'� O
wd�cE s- C G� '^
��.`"ap`°°o'>a
o c�
� a a�i � a+ c. a° �� y p, F.
E"« a � a�i °: c� � � .�
� � � y � a � °v N � o
.� C �
C3 .-+ ,� �
'� .3 � O
%
� ��r
wu3�
a3 p � O
� � � �
.G �
� :o
� ^ a,
cc'�s�
u��
O '� ,.. C
C� O '�
� O � �
� � O
:� "� w �
A :7 .'�7 �
W
A
�
a
I`�
w
W
�
►`�
ca
az
� �
�
.�
��
d
: N
�� d
'Q J
��'a
� �
� N •�.
0
. � a
�, '� a
d
3 .� �
Aa�
� u�
a d �
oc.�
� � h
ac�'ov�
Ny��a
��,�o=
���E
,��a
a � � o
�v +=
x � �
%+ d O c3
~ N N C
��+u�
�N��
c. � � ...
a'�ca
., o :.,
CV �
i c, a.
opoo'�
C
v � G O �
a� w � �+ .�
O a+ V
� C s�.. � a�+
a,•°-��a
� y � H �
a � �, �
V � � O V
3 a �� a
y y Y G7 O
� � c,° y
a,A�°.��c
�' „^C` � y v.�i
� � �o � :=
b
i.
�
�
x
�
�
oa
�
3
A
d'
A�V? '
�� �
U�1Q
�
� ���
�
W ;'paz
G. V ''� U
��QU
�A�►z,
lX�o
cW'-'�
�
�aA��
Q
W
�
W
a
W
�
►�
a
s.
d
� ��
R. f,
� y
A 'o
M C
m
a�
� �
d v
..'''^ �
O�i �
a
y +'
d O'
� k �
a+ c�i
H
� � ° t �, , a� i m « � c �s a � " i � C 4 i � p � u ' �^ �
.� � w � O .0 .Y � 7 t+ O
O� y t�',.I 'yC b � t�r � w � +u-� � � F�. �
�+ � o `� a
��,-� �aa��°w,�,m3���
�e�o00a,a"�ae a,,o�
�a° � a��eo=.°c��S;da�
��v �0 �'� =o"�r;`� °•,'
?,?; d��'osu.n�yo'�m
°� ��$����m�d�aca
a a, . �.,.c ,x « o,
y~ vj ��� � p w p R�+ �' y� F V A
.-»yo >i'„��'Lty.a,,��.ea'
y�'�S g�'���������,�,
p��a w c'�esd.cd.o.�c�.�� �Cl
N�muE�«S�i:3.odddEai
� �;r � n.[�Ny� c� w� °��P a�i° W'�U"�-�i
� O O �
O •� 'O
r'�-�°, vi a c'> > q a... oi 'y a, o'-' �o ;:' m pq r.
�o o�"�o ^ o ec s. m� c• `..° � a, �� �� eo rx
c� o a, � „�;; �.°1. � w a m p, a, ^ F E-� v2
� �' Q � `� ,d .� N ° 0 � �' � °' `" ca T� � cL � s. � `� °' a �'' "
pp � w �" CL. "" .... W c� O .L] W Q
�� cy•o.� � v c���� e a'` �� U� o;: �� �� aaa
a�� �y'°'��`c °��'s��.3co,sy���..°� :� o�� ��'C �wa
s. K � �Atv
�+ y a.o ^ w � °°.a � � ; o y u ;o � � � � c. o� � ,� I �
���,.j' a6 v d�� t�C V'O O� v G�-�+ �:� d v�� 7 �y a w � V
va«� u 3v o>. � e o._ y ���::... m �,.c o ..
c•- oo' o c �n s» oo... �c ;,, �.. ,� a o enY.. a �,,; y '� a
ac �� w co o� w�'^pa P� � o �.o d u�a y eo XGqv�
�°'� �h p1��c�"•�° :° a ��r,�eS °���i
�° a� c�'• a, v w�o c�i d.^. °' aa, a�i a, `' u°', cw � o ra�.c-°:�s« a�i uza'�,
•.. z..• . o, y... y.., co u.n E c. �0 3 c-- s� a�- v.. u a, m•- v, v, v1 Q ��
L C Cl 47 O •1 L
CO""'� � ��� q 7'� .i"+ CO���^p'V �.CC
„�_, V,� ,Li �_„ � Cl vl i.�. � tW a y,�,i O G
�� L C U E� r+ � Y � �'O r.. � :+
��� d y y�E u N� y y V« Q' L. u� �
N `�'� ��^:Q �`� o o�� 3 �� �,o�
oj y� O�� Gr 7'Q '^�� �� h�p CL y a'y .'�n ++ 61
' 7 '�y � y C' y �p N.0 y� ul C%' L U R7 N
00 c3 C C�i 00 O�' C vd'i �� aLi � O'.' � L.Q 4+ d
g=° � m'> � o`� °' o° C c, m`' � o a, r' tio
°'� N °'o 'u � aa�, ° � m ��
� �E
° �� �a � a� � e a"c o �.3'° y �-°� ° '
t�i1 ..�+ � C� O O Q t" c� � O u+ v`� pp
C� `n [a (i = ':: '� s � .c� ar,,,i �' •a; A v ,-�i
.� c. Oi c�.> «+ r.,, T7 � � m 7 �
fr O/ 0! ._. ^ V1 C
F � � _ _ ~ � y N O e� � � N :-0 � ... y c0 .-r
:� « 'm � � y � J � a o `- v, s, v, :o u � ::. c .-�
�i
a ..+ -- �
� O y q
>
L ^ o 0
v� �^., Q ...
O � «
� y CJ C^. y
O
ayci � ya �'
��«�a
y � y G/
r. o ^ c�
cca�,aN,°
L'" N � � �C
O �p ,�,,, 7
�v� a'
�. 'C c�. � �
O 6� w li c0
Q �
['� M
��
�+WN
az�
���
:��Q
I a �
�;Hz
�a
�q..]
r� W
" 3
U�(YiQ
w I
L ' •y '�^ � '"L,' d V .'�� {�,,, O
~ 7 q O � 3�'L' %. � h.
�.V i" a C,� �w � 00 O
c c�. �.�, •� 4; t�.�q y G ,v�
.� G=i '� 7O� � U'C7 M a� e4
y � t� P.'� m^ 7� � .�
��
�� �w ��� o � �c o
^ �'�q^ p p �N� �in t,
. ^�,��o�w � ��'��
� 7 00 � N�"... Oa �w�..�00
� � � � y � �+'�... � 3 7
c 00�.x �~ y'�a� °�+v�
¢�v� ..� .�;
o �
ri CV C�•0 A q��� cd ��'� �
i. �
�.�. _
�
h �
d "
�
t�. ^ O
�°
� u
C �
� O �
�a
� � o
.� O pp
� a.S
z�F
� .r C10
Ai�i .�i
� � Q
�a�
a z
av�a
��W
aEa•A
�
NAa
�t] N a �
OR.'E'��
�,z��
N
.�
..V.
i.
..+
N
A
rr
a
�
�
;;'
E
Q.
h
a
ri
c�,aa
�N � � 7
v � t�'., o
N
C 6�„ � Q,
�+ �
v �
.��b �
E'��
��; av
y � V •d
ow °'o �'
� � ��y �
ed �+�C N
� O 'O 00 O
1G
�
Q� y
� ?
� p
��
00
N �
m�
C•
d �
3�
Q C
:., �
� y
.�. �
C
O �,
� �
CV
� �
� ~ �
H � w �
O �� Z �
.: �(;aV A
m a�z N
.v a I '� e
� r 3 .
v � q �+
C �
� �
� � ., W �
� � A `� a
�, a
� [a~F �
� • �� ti
G o-..� '7 "J
ri v1 � F ,-i
q � .
����o
� 's a c
U y � ^
� �y1 O �
r F '�`
i. � � y
v u � 7
N
e; G � c
� ..�i � O
«
� �/! fA u r�i
�'^o�,�+
...uc°.c�.a�i
o«� �
v��°.-'�
��E>°v
:-0
s
'O
':i
e
�
H
CO
.5
3
�
d
'.7,
�, vi
_a
��
N �
C � �O M L
U vJ �
G' m q C
y � � � �
O y �.y �
,� a, �e
,�d°:�,o
; � � �
.� ' �
p, G C. 7 a.Q+
Q C
u; '° '� a
a •- � ;� &
iV.. � q � d �
� «
t�t�u^o
U �� ��p��
�> v�, O+aa�i
c0 G' y a'
t�,�?V �'
�v
�����
���„�,o..-»".
.0 ce � A
N���`'�
d �' y
�3��� �
0
M��°o �7
�b a
����� �
.� � p � �
W
F.
q «°�' c a f� �
a3000 �
v
�
'd
C
�
EO
b
�
.o
..V,
A
�
a
ri
r �;
� �
�$
''� pl
O y
� 7
l6� p
a°
w
x � �i
F y
� �
a,� �,
�a+m
,G y" ..�.
�ux
a� �
�i p'
G ,". ��„ "" C7 G � ^ �-'
� .tA � U y- ^ i « .i
^ � N L � '� � ~ � N ��i7
es o a, ,� .a � s. e
N~ d y y C! C�7 w � f' �
����u� �`�aiai'o
.� � � � aS r: � O � � m �
H
� � c a ,,.; � � a � ,,.., � ec �
o G"' ��' .0 N� N O s" � p
U � U� C C G+ _�'C V
U J�� �� w «` V � N� N
.:: V V1 � � �"
Q O G� w c�n. . M c. OC O C O C
a� vi o�� c`o c•� � E N c°
�� u �� c,;oo,,...c
� _ �-y:�x � � �
� L .0 w U � � �C-. ^ ^J � 't7
M � �
� ^ V = t�."
•�+ r G t: C�
tnn �
� %: � L Q!
N � r "' U
� r ai
= C O'�.�'+
�°�cy
i3 ..u-. y t"' � w
V1 � Vl ? � y
cyo=tiOUv
��� a
, ����;o
7 '-= � ,Y � +"'
a
t� � � Q y L
�
�o��E�.
ao��,��
u+ V. w . �0
N
ay+ �
d �
�S
�s
Qi
vi y
��
� A
� �
��
��
�'y F
��
.!] �
7
a�
a
C'�
d
�
GJ
>
.�
�
�
C.
�
�
U
�
r? � r C �,ci C r��-. `^t -`=
C CC C C� r C"�, ��
:_ C 'C y = C � .-� 6� � �:
"' .� Q G f. � ��.. G��i �%+
rr.+� c.� d s.•
c�. +� ,�, �.G C� C '�" C. O
C�" C p "' � d�'' cd C
��.-. ^ a+ L$ l0 f: L" i+
c3 t4 ,C C� � w q
ir�''��°�y~o��•
y ...
°—�Q �' 3 c.cv o•`=�"' c�',
•�... ;� c g•-+�� ag
?y'ro,oc�3d"��
�F�co'-°u°��.°c;
C ��R7 �L cC «A+ �Q'ip �
� C, � � G O t,. �q� � � p �
� r/� «+ .G O� w LL O r-1 •+ a
��.
Go�n�� t h-�1►��-1-.es� laS'�
• La Grange� ;�hansor., fia-e1, S�eridan, a!�d ;•:c�;:e,
znd the follo��is�g member;: voted a�ainst *he sa*�e:
AJone
'•:j'F .�U�C:; SAIL' n� SC? rrIC;: t:�AS ��CL�R�"D DUI Y FASSEJ A::J
;{eticn by Iva-e1, secon�e� b,y S.he�tuan to adcnt rescl ,.icr.
''et!cn carried unan{-et.�ly.
�.J.
b presenta`�en w�+s aa�e by p�rs. Laurie Johr.scn :•:es�e.r. t:c-�s
and '!r. L. i:clme, Do�a6las Fir Ply�•cod Assoc'.a cn, in re.-arc
tc use of nlyr�o�� for extericr walls and th use �f nl.pkcc::
fcr h�r.!e de=.�elepment. Motjcn b�� :•:olke� s er_dea b�� S'.»rid�r.,
to ; efer ent'_re L a �ter to L'�:` i n;ng Stan *6s Cor.�mi`tee *er
recc^:r.^.e^da-{cn and re�crt. ]�:otion c2�• ied unani-:ous].}•.
ro-1o1:•�r.g nublic hear�ng, �:ction b:�agel, secended ry 4Jclke
authcrizing Ya��cr and City I�ana to sign and accent S:r.�l
nla` cf �?itzeman A6ditiar.. �:o _ en carried unan; °oLSl}�,
Fo-? c���'r.2 d? seussicr_, z�ot� , by ''clke, seccnded hy ;;� e? t,-
aTer.d the 6ra:t cf OrSir. ce �`l�(` *t addir.g ±her-tc a n�::• �e-•_
ticr. �� : clloti�s: _� -
Section 4. It i hereh�� sreciiically prc•�ide4 t:�at ;•ri-�
re �c� to each of *_he above zoning c!lar.ges
as ^�ade herej y�. ro �er,:iit shal? be issued by t!�e �;•s1a°�:-
T^snectcr �.1•T. cne (1) pear of ti:e cnange, exce^t a_'t^^
ar�rcval ° the saTe ccta-ne9 ?��� t}e Citp Ccunc'1.
':oticn c rried unar.i!�ous'y.
.'•'et? by T•Jclke, secon:e:i by i;agel tc acceat secend 1•e=:`r:
ef ^dir.ar.ce '=100 amerd'rg the zoniz:g ordinar.ce o� '?�e C`-•: -:
�. id] e} rezenir.e certa±r. lots in Rice Creek Flaza Scu _:^. /: ��: �-
t'cn. N.cticn carried uran'•-ously.
�'' �r�':J rF /:'r-^,1:` S �iF�C ;: - Ju] �, � � , o�p
N.embers presPnt: Cha. Shaffer, Plu�, Gcodrich, Grif;;:�s
1. A reques •*_ for i:�a;ver cf minis�ur� si.de lot ^eouirer..��- - r�
the ccnstruct�.cn o� aa a±tached car�ert to wit'r:�r. `'-r�.e
(?) feet cf `::e sjde Ict line at 6(�61 - 6th St. ?:. E.
:teouest by Ja�es ?. SF�ard� o�•mer. '3oard rec��-:e :is s�..•c _
"a?� adic!r.irg nrcnerty o::�r.er signen ]et-er sta*'n^ ^e �:-:d
hC C��.°C�iC.^.,
2• ^-^•@ "@4llEf' rOT 8 Vfi^iance 0I1 f!1@ S?de yar�3 re�uire'":r•-,'
fro�^ five (5) feet to three (3) feet cn I:ot t^=^� eer. f' :•
=1oc'- seven (71, Chris*?.e Additicn for the ccr.s�ruct'rr. c- �•.
a`tac�e� garaee� the a�dress at said loca±icr beir.g -=�1 �'c.-.r-�
St. P:. E.
Reouest by Edgar ?harer, o�:•ner. Ecar: reco.�^:er.ci; a�-r•-
t�al, ad � oir.ir_g pronerty o:•:ner sigr.ed letter s_s"_r.� °-�� ��_
nc oriec"or_s. �
.. A reqL�st fo^ a var; anes on tre s; d� yar� :�e��;'rer.:e::- :
fiv� (K� feet te t:,o ar.d c.^.e-half (2�-) feet :cr �::� cc�.-
struc�icn of an attached gara�e at �7�1 - t•1es`_ "eore T,s'.�e
Dri•:e Ii. E.
Reoue-t by Gerard Bib�au� o�:�ner. acar6 recc.-��r.,�s sr r� :•-:-
as de�ached garage in r-ar yard �ct feas'ble bscavse lc' =
to lakeshore. � �
4• =-i roousst fflr-a SDeCial iiC"�!I'm�t tOi t�l° ODe^8t�f^ Cr
• d�sntal clinic oa Lot se0enteen tl7) and sc-:t': 7.? feet
of I•ot �izteen (161� B1ock five �51� Rice Creer Plaz9� SoL'�
1H
2 � :;
wddit!on-being the �ot at the llortheast corner of a;ississipoi.
street ana Setan� Street. Thet a t�e limit be aet and R-�
Se s ien� t ira ie v,ed 3'c�r #� i s�ermi t. '
�epuest .?�y Ri�iurd,J..3'rezor:e, D. D. S., 179 Hartmar_
C*_rcle. . 3card �,�co�sen�is,sap�eval. :�roperty aS joins co�,er-
cial �rcrer`y �n �e side, wo•-ld bc des{.rable asaet to co-^�ur.its�.
5. A reqve;t for �:•a+v�° �f ssde yard r-auire�nent fror� ten (1('1
feet tc se��en and a!�alf (�-k) feet for censtruc*ic^r. c•S
attac!�ed garare ar_d nerch cn Lot nine (9�, Elock five (�), Ponn_�
Eodit'�r., 5�•'_� - 7th S`_reet I:. E. Request bp Lakeland Bui?ders
ana r,are%:asers cf nr��erty. 3o�rd reco�.^.ends aoproral cf re-
auss� �- a�t:•ti^F nrc-er�y xi?1 hare ';:•entv s;x (261 feet
side yard. '
.6. A rec��st *er raive° cf side ya„d requ{re^�e*�t frc:r: ±er,
(1') feet to �ig^t (8` feet for ecnstructic-n ef three
(3� re�rce^ d::e:]ir,P i:ith a`;.ac;eo garage ar.3 nerch cn floer
a'�e•:e va^a-e cr• 'et t� irtv (�c`!� Blccl: three (3`, ;•:c�cre IakQ
?i!lls. ��nnu?st cy ?;c}<ar9 Kirsch, 5i17 Jackson Avenue� i;��:
P*ie!-,�cr,. �oa^9 reco�^�ends annro•,a'! as a porch on `oa-�f
gara�e dc^es r.ct c�ast!tute living c?uarters and re�u�re�er.�
fcr ga•ar� `s cr.l.v :tve (�� feet side yar3.
F, r. Shaf''er, Cna+r:�ar.
R. (?. Grif: itt?s
T�. C. Goodr' ch
. H. rlum
J•'c*_i�n rv �.her`dan, seccnded by Johanson that ?.oard c±f A-+*+ea;s
Aercrt be acceoted in its encir�*y, t�'oticr. carr'ed unan!�-,ous7�:.
_I tii::t"::� CC:•:"T :37�:7 =cE�CR'f - July � � 1�'S8
rre��^t _ ^^;a±^.-a- ('�'•.�- �-L....�s :�e.
�> > -
I. E re����s`_ Sor rczc^`r� :rc° ?-� ge^cre] mi:?t{r.'e d•:- i�g,
�C� �'� Pf.'•^-eT3' }'l:5?.^.P.SS. LC�«� '�Y-E"ltV-S=7C �c�:'� f3!?Q .•'@_^.t.\'-
se:�er. f27`� !'?ccl� s'_� (�-1 �e�;<�t�r�s �43dit'�r. to "ec�• .ics��`)le,
the sa^!e `'�'_!:g tw� fc^t�� foct lc*.s c� t'�e �as* s'de 4-n
5tre• •:, c^� :�u�-fire3 txeat}• fe � � (12!' � Sotrth of }6tr Avenu�.
Cl„�^cF i^�s�n, rr],G �:�*� St., Llopd �ears 561? �+:�: ;t
t:rs. :. .•.ia^ Ds:��s. s� r. _� t, -+ � •+
„ � r ?? • -�' S`., $.^.�? .�ce ..a?:- ,� 552 , 5t� S`...
a�ne�1•e� _ c. '� �2r ar en rezc.*.'_ng. 3eco� Te�:d r3 by ('aYe� t•.� �
ne ccr.s'oera`ic:: be �'�•e.^. a� .*?�'_s ti^:e as 1 t:?d �
• te snc� zcne�
a'=d +_'= -•- °;., �f T"'°'o-^-� St2-e '�= 7��•a•: = nr � .,- � .
�- = 1 n_ ar_S a_ .i r c� -F^:o..
Ceur.c'.� -ake s'�-i_ar ac=`-n. j!9CC!:32: � I';;ghes, �;ct��n car-
rie�. -
II. To con-ider t'�e nroacsed nrel' ..ina�y o'at of �+_ce Creelc
�laza, ':c�`a b��"��^. �o�..,, a �uc3�,.= „_� _
S�C.*: C_� ^.8� . Ci '"c.
11"T`.:�eas� �U2:':2�' �1��1� Oi J2C� � r�'�a p � r .. ...
_e_r. (1S, an1 I,or�h:•:est
q:�ar�er (':�= 1 c^ Sec.icn s�x'e �(1c1, �'o1:�ns:�'.� th�rty (�'),
�an,,e tk•en,.p-fo�:r f2-!, the ^�e be;ng nrcneriy Nort}: cf �tics
CreeY., :•:ps- c�' LTn!versity �n�e P?. E.
�_ , rrnest b'adser. �eare-i �e_*'c^e Coa:.'_ ss? on �r. beh�l�' of
nrer.osed �lat c° �ic� re�l: 'laza, ;corth Fdditi�n. ?•;cticr �y
Fue:�e-, secended by ' e t�?at nlat be apnrcved. �;o};.-- �?rr=e�i,
TTj. "C CC^S�dET `..0 DPC^CS°'1 �reli-_,narY DZE� Cf ��E V?C?`.�?.
Gille_te F' it`or. an� Flerence ?ErY. A�dit'cn l���r.� :;ort^
ef A'ississiop' 'reet sad �as� cf Jacysoa Street ard 'ot r.`^�
(�) At�ditcr' S�:bdivisi^_^. "21.
'�'. lie Fric3:son 9DD@8!'@� ir. be*�alf af oroncsed preli-'_-
nary r,] , of r:-a::ov. La^ds �d31" nr.. After d` scuss'_rn t�e -a`_
��QlL:2 tn�•�p.: U•.�,1 FI'CC PtPD8.^''s nre"i�'na^; D.'•E� C'` all ef
t.-.._ 8_^E8 8.^.a 1if^i.5 C'�t tt':E C@.tC8�'^� Of tJC'.,'^OE^V stree�s.
!'^. Z;�_�+'a,floa^E� tQ 28�.'� Q^ TTC'n'S2a V2C8'_{^g Ci 2r, 8^d
�' . 8.^.� ... n.re� !'C_^ S��bQ'_��; 5� . . -��.....,CS9S. T?2C0�•".�.^ti@U
11
f'
�
. P
Y
Deed transferred Nov 13 tQ59
r1t�V Of' �'!'1�� 8�*
Town - City or Vill�,ge
KENNETH W. CAMPBELL, School District ._141�?k__. __
County Auditor Mill Rate-General.__�79.?.2..
-�------ �-- N� 12 8 g
Anoka, Minresota State_..._...6._22
�- � --------
� Total
-----------�-�--�---�-----�- ---� �-
Dear Sir:- Thc� following described,property _.Lot 17 & S. 7.3� of Lot.16, slock 5
� ----_-------------•------.._..-----�-�------.......------------ � --•-------Rice. Creek Plaza South•Add.
----�-�--� ........................................ .�------•-�-----.___......_- � - .. .- -� -� -� � ----•----�------...--�--------.__-_...._._..._....._..--�--._....._....
' was on May 1, 19 59.___ assessed as follows: TAXES
� True and full value of land $_______________________________________________ General $._?�•`�0..9�.._._.___.
True and full value of buildings $ ................................................ State $._______9.60:__._.___
Total true and full value $----------------------------------------------- Specials $....._..._..--------.._....-_--
Assessed value $-----15�:--N?� ..................... Total $-_��.56
A port i on o f the above p arc e 1, de s c rib ed as f ol lows :.__.See_. reverse.. side____________________________
--------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------.---..........-- �-----......---........-----•-•-• --�-------------.. ..- -------•- --._...---- �--..._..........-- �--.....------•--------------------�-- --------•--�-----.
was, previous to January lst, 19 _.50.__., sold to Caxoll C. Grotr
................................ .......�---�--- -..._..............._..............._.-�-�-�--- ----..
making a divis'ion of the tax necessary. ...............�-------�---� ---�---...._.........----..._..--•-------..._...........---�--------......
Based on a total true and full value of $ ................................................for original trac
the portion sold to .............._Groth_______..___.._____.___.___.___.,..,...._.._.___.__._____..._.___should be assessed as follows:
True and full value of land $.._..__._...�'_=%`:_� ...................... General $__.11.7?....
True and full value of buildings $ .................. .......................... State $.__...__._._�_�.__.___.....,
:--
T o t al t ru e and f ul 1 val ue $...--- --- '-�,,-----.----.. - .............. S p e c i a 1 s $.._:....- --.------...------.--
Assessed value $....._....-•---"-%-��-----� ................. Total $.._11�98-•-�----�
Leaving for original tract
True and full value of land $______________!__:_c:,____._.___.._....,_.. General $419.,24__._____.___
True and full value of buildings $.._..__.�.�.`'�� ................... State $._....9�.34._.._.____.__
-= �-
Total true and full value $______:-_f'_� _________________________ Specials $_.......__._.._..._._____....
Assessed value $..--�----�"�,---="--'��-----� ---�-�-- Total �42�3,58-��-----....
D i v i s i on mad e t h i s.------- `'�`` --�----- -�-day o f.--.-... �;':'::_. :..:._.... ---------19 �---- -�- ��
Approved by:
A s s e s s o r----�-----�- -- -------- -- -
Audi tcr
--- ---�---- -- ---- ----- �-- - -�
Taxes per books:
------ - _ - - --�----- -- ------.... S e 11 e r .._.... ...... - . ............
�-- - --�-�� ... ............. .....�---�-�-� -- .........
-- - - �- ---. _ - ----- -......_. Buy e r
.._...._. -_ _ - - - ---......__ .. ............. ....... .-... ..--
TAX DIVISION DATA �
Assessed I General I State
Line 4, pa�e �17 15�
Tax Division:
Li:�e 1+, pa�e 417 150?_
Line 5, �a�e 418_ _ 4�?
Proof Total
Original Tax 1 S111�
43�.9.�i Q.EO
419. 2!� 9. `�4
— ;
i.1.7% .26 I
---- I ---- �
i3o=ah —! 1.��0------ �
,
Special Assessments
�
I
�
Total
440.56
42R.K8
11.9�?
4��-F� . 5�
All that part of Lot 17 a.nd the South 7.3' of Lot 15 lying >-:. o� the fol. des. li�e:
i?eg. at a p+. in the S; line of said Lo+ 17 dist. 75.71' tA]. of +he S� cor. of said
Lot 17; th. N. to a pt. in the N. line of said S. 7.3' of Lot 16, said pt. being
75.86' W, o� +�e E. line of said Lot 16 & thereby terMinating, (S�sbj. +.o easements
and covenents of record)
1K
1-
(12-31-64)
- -- .�. , x�,'�.. . , .�UM1..� ., . •�-;� - :,-....-- r� , �_. ,
., _
- - - - •z. .. . . . ' "
ZONING
45. 07. R-2 District: Uses Permitted, "X ref, 45. 05, �45,19"
1. Uses permitted in R-1 Districts, "X ref. 45. 06"
2. Two-family dwellings (Ref. 260)
45.08
I `1 ��-' `Zov�w.� (�de1
3. Boarding and lodging houses,
(Ref. 70) �
45. 071. Two family (only) dwellings; on same level adjacent to one another and
not above a below other dwellings, Except for the res�iction noted the provisions
aPplicable to the R-2A Dis�ict are otherwise the same as in the R-2 Dis�ict. (Ref.
236.)
45, 08. R-3 Distr�ct — Uses Permitted, "X ref. 45. 05. 45,19"
1, Uses permitted in R-2 Dis�icu. "X ref. 45. 07, 45, 06"
2. Multiple dwellings and dwelling groups.
3. Automobile courts, hotels, apartment hotels, motels and tourist homes,
provided no business shall be conducted except as a service for guesu there-
of, accessible to customers from inside the building,
4. Resort transient cabins and housing accomodations and the following acces-
sory uses for the accomodation of guests, boat and motor storage and ren-
tals, bait shops, dining rooms, soft drink and snack bars,
5. Colleges and Universities,
6. Fraternity and sorority houses,
7. Private clubs, lodges, libraries and museums, except any that are primar-
ily commercial uses.
8. The following uses, but only after securing a use permit for the establish-
ment, reconsuuction, suuctural alteration, enlargement, or moving of
any such use, after approval of such permit by che board of appeals and the
ciry council, and subject to any conditions imposed by such use permit, as
provided in Section 45.40 or other section hereof:
a. (Repealed - Ref. 97)
b. Clothes cleaning or laundering pick-up stations, clothes pressirig
and tailoring shops, and self-service laundeties,
(Ref. 70)
c. Fiower, fruit and vegetable sales and stands,
d. Gasoline service stations and accessory greasing, servicing, ciean-
ing and washing of automobiles, including minor adjustmencs,
and repairs, but not general repairs� overhauling, rebuilding, de-
molition or spray painting,
e. Offices and office buildin s for business and rofessional uses. in-
cluding banks m ical and dental clinics,
f, Public offices and of�ce buildings, police and fire stations, post
offi ces.
g. Public urility offices and ofHce buildings, telephone exchanges,
uansformer stations� electric substauons or pumping stations.
h, Restaurants� refreshment M�^a^ Sut not any selling or serving of
alcoholic beverages. 1 L 58
R- 2 DISTRICT USE
PERMI TTED LItiiITE
MULTIPLE DWELLIN
R-2A DI STRI CT
USES PERM1 TTED
USES PERMITTED
R-3 DISTRICT
MULTIPLE D WELLIN
d ��,11���`� � s�•� 9�v �:L"��T
ATTORNEYS AT LA�'t'
�'irgil C. Herrick M E M O R A N D U M
james D. Hoeft
Grcgg �'• Herrick
Of Counscl
Dat•id P. Newman
TO: Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
FROM: Virgil Herrick, City Attorney
DATE: August 27, 1990
RE: Ordinance Interpretation Questions
This memorandum is in response to your memo of August 24 1990-,
wherein you ask for an interpretation of three differe
ordinances. I will respond in the order that you hav in your
memo.
1. You ask whether a property owner needs t get a special
use permit for property zoned C-3 in order to tablish an auto
rental use. As you indicate, no specific men ion is made of auto
rentals in a C-3 district. However, mentio is made of sales of
new or used automobiles. I believe that auto rental operation
is similar to sales of new and used auto biles and should be
handled in the same manner as those use . Because a special use
permit is required for sales of autom iles, I am also of the
opinion that a special use permit s uld be required for the
leasing of automobiles. I also no e that the property owner is
requesting oth�r uses that requi a special use permit, and that
the inclusion of the request fo an auto rental use will not
cause the property owner any ditional expenditure of time or
money.
2. You ask whether i is necessary for Lindstrom Metric to
plat certain property i order to subdivide a portion of a meets
and bounds parcel loca ed at 8251 Ashton Avenue. Both our
ordinance and the St e's statute require a plat for subdivisions
that create lots t t are less than two and one-half acres in
size. In looking t the diagram that you attached to your
memorandum, I a assuming that the proposed parcel is less than
two and one-ha acres. Both the City ordinance and the State
statute do p mit waiving this requirement. They state as
follows: " n any case in which compliance with the foregoing
restricti s will create an unnecessary hardship and failure to
comply d es not interfere with the purpose of the subdivision
regula ons, the platting authority may waive such compliance by
adopt'ng a resolution to that affect and the conveyance may then
be led or recorded." If the affected property owners do not
wi h to plat the property, but instead propose to use a
aistered Land Survey, they should apply for a variance.
Suice 205, 6401 University Avcnue N.�.'; E�ridte�, Minnesota 55432, 612-571-38�0
Barb Dacy
August 27, 1990
Page 2
Whether the staff should recommend granting the variance
be considered in terms of whether ther any substantial
advantage to requiri opposed to a Registered Land
3. You ask certain questions regarding the Suburban
Engineering building at 6875 Highway 65. This property is a
non-conforming commercial use in an R-3 area. The questions that
have been asked relate to the types of uses that can be put into
the building and regulations regarding the placement of signs on
the property. As you indicated in your memo, there are no
regulations regarding commercial properties in an R-3 area. Your
proposal to allow uses and signs consistent with the CR-1 zoning
district seems reasonable, and I have no problem with that --
approach.
VCH:ldb
1N
` & F�; : . ..�,. . . �;.,���,�ykr� �&y. y �> 1 1 ��'�'�'b��. � .r .
- . ' ��Y� s K ��W. s, � j �, z
. � . . .. . . . .. ` k.,
' CITY OF FRIDLEY , . , . ., „
6431 ODTIVERSITY AVENOE N. E. -�. ;,�,
. ;
FRIDLEY, rIld 55432 a ;; ;; � , ° (7olt�ii.ty pevelpgt�ent D�ar�lt = �� ��
(612) 571-3450 N. - ,- , � � �' �`.
t: `a ° v F � ;y � �� ' s. � j ; a ��k.'� � `�
� � s
. i� - C a,. �� S' ''� �R'.; . . a, � � c� �s Y c� ;.,� � y r�u b � � � Ft>x
- . :. . :: �;� �, _, . .. . , ; n�++�in��4�s.' Y4 ':
Rffi4�iIIaG A'PZ�'I.ICA7.*IQId I�ORM fi � � � �# �'
�+ � r� +� s �.v 4 �� ;�. � �n '�
� � � �a �a �w .i„ +,s� "� ,��r.�kwa �:s�a� g�?r' ��i'��'`��{ �,��
i
� � .. �re . ��� � j . i + �r:i s ar �4 r,�a - �x i�i. ,y.� ��,
3 r �- ' ; f: � '- yr . . ., a: ,. �+�. u. . �" .�." _ �. . , . , , , $ � a•, , . _ ,
k ��. '- �
j��All �Qllll'�4'fC��;�
Y PZiAPE[ZT'Y II�TI�T Slte ]A •
: ,�..t p: k�� �i:���� ��r:� > �`���
'��5. - 203-205�Missi�ssi�ppi S�;� Mirin�,�a.p�
� :�
, :F � ,: ; �>' � '' �"������ '�
Legal descrip�tio�:�� � ��See� survey��° at�ached �. ���
' � ;; a �ra
. � � ` �� '� � �` `� �' „ n� k u �'- `a �ro +3 +;�
L�t 1 ?� ���Bl.ack' �`° ��'� ��� ���'� � Asddit
�
. � � � a;t ��Y G �. �, �; ��: �; �" ��' �
w CXarrerit'"zonirig: "R ..3 � � �'�`'�.� '��. � � � f:�` ��'�
�, ;• r. :��� � :��v t ��. j `� a"`
�t� s � - . .. ".� '�' .. �F � � 1�'"fi'° ��'` �"`;" ,� ..
�,
3
�� r�
't� ".�`"1........""raa.J' vaa�.aay -� sn , ^s -e^+-ra .�� �er.'.7�Fi3[�hR'€
2�. . . : ^"� �� ,� � � '�,���� y ����:��r ��
�Leason for. zc�inq���Ta��a"� �tnoda�.e p�"o�`spe�e'�-�.'ve�
� �� .� '� �� _ ,� rx:;?
� ��,�� M s� �` �. �� •��'� ?
,-F�E '�R ''7I�O�TI�T ' y �� , �. �- �, �, �
_ �.
(Contract Pum�asers: � Fee �Owners must .sign`this'form'p
�
� T -C F Bank.:.fsb.
::'� ,
p,�� 801 Marquette ,Ave. , Minneapolis� ,,.MN 55�}02, -';u . ;� 4.r;
� N
� � `.�e ,.t. ��. �, i � s �' i .��, • r �, a � s��,� Y �i k
F. .
�` � ' } 370� 7000 ��-� "' °�� � �'��'� M
.. .. _ _ . � . _, ,, <
-
s� _. .. ,., .
� �
dDAYTIl� PHOd�iE ' °
.r. .
` � .�
, ^� +e;:; b � � �. �
`� � � 3 T
szc�t�tE � , � 6 / 19 /#91 � ���
�
�
� , � �
TlIilr.Ba7.1@�F a• � �'� ,�+ �j�'•�$, 1� ��E�'',ty` �'��i����4a �r � � �+� �+���� �
. . . ., . � . � _ .. �p . . ._.. , � 4
.. . . , . .. � �
P�'1'ITIO�1EIt I1�OR'N�TI�1 . � , .., i�� .. . : � . . , �,�, ,� x
. �' � �•e �" ,� : '- ,u; „�
N�1ME :Bailey Enterpr'ises, Inc. � ; - �y � �
ADI�2F5S �8� N. WabasYia St. St. Paul MN 551�2 ��":,°
- :
,. LIAYTIME PHONE 22�-5482 °�
SIG,�7.URE .. L1ATE 6/ 19 / 9 �
, , . .< ..; .... :;,
_.,...._.,.��.,.._�..�.a„i' ..�.�....:�..Y.��h.�.�,,3�.::.:..��...:..... � " �
Fee: $300.00 ,.
, _
,
, _, � .
,. . �, -: .
_ : . � ;' .. � - _:, - ,:r , , � :.s =.�
Pezmlt ZQA — -� � i � , �� � :,,;
R�eoei +� � � ,
# _ �eo � �
Pt # _
Application .by: _ ^, � � g-,�.� � �` *�
rec�ived � � ,.
,
� � J::� .i.."� f� '.... L S �r�� � ��l � �.� ■i' � e k
SC�l�tl�.� P 1011 �: TM'�'
, .. ,. �
. .�
.. . . „ ..�, �.y,., �- ;. � .
° X, `, �
�� Cl�% �..l.ulA.�ll {.7Q4G ' H - '�` - �. � �T � _�
r ,�e �w ����� .j' ;' '�. - �, , . 4 r. F!y = k. Ss �-., e 'c �
...
- '' �' � ti .��' �' n �,:'- r � � �
'f. y L �, ���
.,.� , ..
r �'`� %, r �� ���
�, ;. i _ , �1��:
,
■
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 24, 1991
����_�_�__��������__��_�������_____������_�____���_�_�������� ��
CALL TO ORDER-
Chairperson Betzold called the July 24, 1991, Pl
meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Don Betzold, Dave Kondrick,
Connie Modig, Brad Sielaffj
Sue Sherek, Diane Sa
'Commission
Saba,
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Commu ty Development Director
Michele McPherson Planning Assistant
Mark Kvalheim, B iley Enterprises, Inc.
Jean Dufresne- mbrio, Children's Charm, 240
Mississip ' Street N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick,� seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the
July 10, 1991, Planniy7�g Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE,� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIE� IINANIMOUSLY.
!'�l1D71L�ltiTTALT T/1 7fTT7.TL� �]L '1 A!1'1 TT TITLTTLT/� /�l1LRLlT[+G�TATT 11RTLttTTL�C •
MOTION by . Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to amend the motion
on page 3 paragraph 2 as follows: "to recommend to City Council
approva of vacation request, SAV #91-03, by William Pickering, to
vacate he southerly 15 feet of the northerly 40 feet of a drainage
and ility easement located in Lot 11, Block 2, Innsbruck North,
gen rally located at 1467 Innsbruck Drive N.E."
�PON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING, ZOA #91-01, BY
MARK KVALHEIM OF BAILEY ENTERPRISES, INC.:
To rezone from R-3 , General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2 , General
Business, on Lot 17, Block 5, and the south 7.3 feet of Lot
16, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition, Anoka County,
Minnesota, lying east of the following described line:
Beginning at a point in the south line of said Lot 17 distant
1P
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 24, 1991 PAGE 2
76.61 feet west of the southeast corner of said Lot 17; thence
north to a point in the north line of said South 7.3 feet of
Lot 16, said point being 75.86 feet west of the east line of
said Lot 16 and thereby terminating. Together with a
nonexclusive driveway easement over the North 10 feet of the
South 17.63 feet of Lot 16, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South
Addition, Anoka County, Minnesota, generally located at 203 -
205 Mississippi Street N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTZON CARRIED AND T8E PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:31 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at the no�theast
corner of the intersectiQn af lYlississippi Street and 2nd Street.
Located on the property is a two-story office building which shares
a common wall and lot line with the adjacent building addressed 201
Mississippi Street. The proposal is to rezone the property from
R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General Shopping Center.
Ms. McPherson stated the property has been zoned R-3, General
Multiple Dwelling, since 1958. At that time Lot 17 was one entire
lot, and a building permit was issued to construct 201 Mississippi
Street (the west half of the building). In 1958, the City Council
also approved a special use permit to allow the building to be used
as a dental clinic which was required under the Zoning Code in
1958. Offices were allowed as a special use in the R-3 zoning
district.
Ms. McPherson stated that in i959, a lot split occurred which split
the parcel into the two current parcels, and a building permit �,►as
issued for the construction of 203-205 Mississippi Street (subject
parcel far rezoning). Since 1958 and 1959, the uses within the
buildina have complied with the original special use permit issued
in 1958, specifically, dental and medical office type uses.
Ms. McPherson stated that in analyzing the rezoning request, three
criteria need to be evaluated by staff: district use, district
intent, and whether or not the parcel meets the district
requirements. The proposed use of the consignment retailing is
consistent and compatible with the proposed zoning district of C-
2, General Business. The C-2 zoning district would be compatible
with the adjacent C-3 zoning district and uses.
Ms. McPherson staff analyzed the subject parcel, the adjacent 201
Mississippi Street parcel, and both parcels combined to determine
if any or all of the parcels would meet the minimum requirements
of the C-2, General Business District regulations, or the CR-1,
General Office District regulations. This "Comparison" was
included in the agenda. It should be noted that there are several
1Q
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 24, 1991 PAGE 3
items, specifically building and parking setbacks and parking space
requirements, which cannot be met by the either the subject parcel,
the 201 Mississippi Street parcel, or the combined parcel. If the
rezoning is granted, several variances will also have to be
acknowledged.
Ms. McPherson stated that although the rezoning request does meet
the district intent and district use, the parcel cannot meet the
minimum requirements of the C-2 district regulations. For that
reason, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission
recommend denial of the rezoning request to the City Council.
Future uses of the parcel can continue to be regulated by the CR-
1 district regulations. The City Attorney previously wrote an
opinion regarding issues such as this one when reviewing the
rezoning request for the Suburban Engineering building located at
6875 Highway 65, which is also currently zoned R-3, �General
Multiple Family Dwelling, and has consistently been used for office
uses.
Mr. Betzold stated that if this rezoning request is denied, he did
not believe there are any other comparable sites in the City where
the City has allowed the situation where a business is using a
larger area next to it to meet the code requirements their property
cannot meet.
Ms. Dacy stated that actually the opposite is true. The former
Suburban Engineering site is zoned R-3 and is an office use. There
is no commercial zoning adjacent to that particular site. The
Knights of Columbus Hall next door is also zoned. R-3. The Moose
Lodge had petitioned to rezone the former Suburban Engineering
site, but the Commission recommended denial of that request. Gne
of the arguments against the rezoning was that the site did not
meet the C-2 requirements.
Mr. Mark Kvalheim stated the problem not only the owners of the
building have, but also the City, is this building hardly conforms
to any regulations. This building is a split level building where
the lower level is at garden level, and the ceiling height varies
from 6 1/2 - 7 feet. Generally, it would be difficult to say that
general office use is going to do well in there. They are looking
at some physical obsolescence. The question is how to deal with
that. Unless the City is interested in having the building remain
vacant for extended periods of time, it is a problem the City is
going to have to grapple with sooner or later.
Mr. Kvalheim stated that the tenant that is requesting to be in
their building is currently doing business in the City. The tenant
has a children's consignment shop in the Rice Plaza Shopping Center
across the street. Their status as a retailer is somewhat
overblown. This is a very low impact retailer. Their volume of
customers and traffic is quite low, and that should be given some
consideration in trying to determine how to create some economic
7R
PLANNZNG COMMTBSION MEETING, JOLY 24, 1991 PAGE 4
viability for this building. If the two buildings are considered
separately, his building has about 4,000 sq. ft. A dental office
occupies 2,000 sq. ft., and they are proposing that the consignment
shop occupy the other 2,000 sq. ft. which has been vacant for at
least a year. There.are 12 parking spaces. They cannot conform
to the building and parking setbacks or parking requirements, and
he thought these are situations that have to be overlooked.
Mr. Kvalheim stated that in tr�ing to establish some history of
what type of businesses have occupi�d the building, he had heard
that at one time a furniture retailer occupied the space. He had
no other inforr.�ation of the impact of that business, but maybe it
is something that could be investigated further.
Mr. Kvalheim stated that in initial discussions with staff, staff
recommended the rezoninq. Rezoning the property seems to make
sense for this particular tenant.
Mr. Betzold stated there are parking concerns. He asked what
happens if a lot of people come at once, and there is not enough
parking? Where will they park?
Mr. Kvalheim stated there is an apartment building with a parking
lot adjacent to the property on the north and Holly Shopping Center
is to the east. There is the possibility of some type of cross-
parking arrangement with the apartment building or Holly Center,
but they have not explored that yet. He did not believe that the
consignment business would attract that kind of traffic. He
bel ieved that they could have parking problems with some other uses
as well, such as a chiropractic clinic, an attorney's office, etc. ,
which are "legitimate uses" in the CR-1 zoning. `
Mr. Betzold stated that he did not think they could look favorably
on this rezoning request favorably without some additional parking.
Ms. M���� a�kPd if the rezoning request is denied, what is the
property✓owner's alternative?
Ms. Dacy stated that if the rezoning request is denied, the
property owner still has the ability to lease the space as office
space. Of course, this does not help the proposed tenant.
Mr. Saba stated that if the City does rezone the property from R-
3, General Multiple Dwelling, to C-2, General Business, and the
proposed tenant does not stay very long, then the property owner
can rent that space out to any business that is allowed in C-2
zoning.
Ms. Dacy stated that if the Commission recommends approval of the
rezoning, then the property owner will have to petition for
variances to bring the property into conformance to eliminate its
"nonconformity". She stated staff believes it would be wise for
� S
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 24, 1991 PAGE 5
the property owner to investigate the possibility of a cross
parking easement with Holly Shopping Center.
Ms. McPherson stated that the two properties combined require 21
parking spaces. There are 12 spaces for 203-205 Mississippi
Street, so they are short 9 parking spaces.
Mr. Kvalheim asked if it is possible to insert some language into
the CR-1 regulations to allow consignment shops.
Ms. Dacy stated that would require an amendment to the Zoning Code,
and that process could take 2-3 months.
Ms. Dufresne-Sombrio stated they need more room for the consignment
shop. They need to be out of their current space by September 1,
and they have to give one month's notice.
Mr. Betzold stated that if he knew Holly Shopping Center was
willing to grant a cross parking easement, then he would be a
little more inclined to recommend the rezoning. Unfortunately, he
did not know that at this time.
Ms. Modig stated the City makes exceptions occasionally for special
circumstances, and she wished there was some way to accommodate
this business.
Mr. Bruce Lundberg, 235 Rice Creek Terrace, stated he saw the
notice for rezoning and was curious.about what is being proposed.
He stated that 2nd Street is the only exit onto Mississippi Street
out of this residential area. He would be concerned about a
rezoning that might increase the traffic in and out of this area
during peak traffic times.
Mr. Sielaff asked about the traffic that might be generated from
the proposed tenant.
Ms. Dufresne-Sombrio stated the shop's hours are 10:00 a.m. - 7:00
p.m. Monday and Thursday; 10:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Wednesday and
Friday; and 10:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. on Saturday. She stated they
use 2-3 parking spaces at the most at one time. There is usually
no more than 1-2 people in the store at one time. During sales,
they might have 3-4 people in the store at one time.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Modig, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CIiAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:15 P.M.
Mr. Kondrick stated he would be in favor of the rezoning if the
property owner is able to get a cross parking easement with Holly
Shopping Center.
1T
pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 24. 1991 PAGE 6
Mr. Sielaff stated he would be concerned about current policies and
the overall impact of a rezoning. He had no problem with this
particular husiness, but there might be problems with future
businesses. He stated he wQUld vote against the rezoning.
Mr. Saba stated he did nat have any objection to this particular
business either, but they should 2ook at all the possibilities that
could go into this building under the C-2 zoning. He stated the
Holly Shopping Center's parking lot is heavily used now, and he did
not know how receptive Holly Shopping Center would be to granting
a cross parking easement.
Mr. Saba stated that if they recommend approval of the rezoning
and the Council approves the rezoning, then one-half of the
building would be zoned C-2, and the other half would be zoned R-
3. That seemed rather strange.
Mr. Kondrick stated this is such a small tenant space that he did
not think there were very many other uses that could go into that
space.
Mr. Sielaff stated he did not believe it is worth taking on all
this uncertainty by recommending approval of the rezoning.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend to City
Council approval of rezoning, ZOA #91-01, by Mark Kvalheim of
Bailey Enterprises, Inc., to rezone from R-3, General Multiple
Dwelling, to C-2, General Business, on Lot 17, Block 5, and the
south 7.3 feet of Lot 16, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition,
Anoka County, Minnesota, lying east of the following described
line: Beginning at a point in the south line of said Lot 17
distant 75.61 feet west of the southeast corner of said Lot 17;
thence north to a point in the north line of said South 7.3 feet
of Lot 16, said point being 75.86 feet west of the east line of
said Lot 16 and thereby terminatirig. Together with a nonexclusive
driveway easement over the North 10 feet of the South 17.63 feet
of Lot 16, Block 5, Rice Creek Plaza South Addition, Anoka County,
Minnesota, generally located at 203 -205 Mississippi Street N.E.,
with the following stipulation:
1. A cross parking easement must be obtained from Holly
Shopping Center for nine additional parking spaces.
Mr. Saba stated he is also concerned about the signage that is
allowed for C-2 zoning.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, RONDRICR, BETZOLD, MODIG VOTING AYE, SABA AND
SIELAFF VOTING NAY, CIiAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED
BY A VOTE OF 3-2.
1U
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JULY 24, 1991 PAGE 7
Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on August
26, 1991.
2. RECEIVE JUNE 27 1991 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES• �
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to receive�the June
27, 1991, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. �'�
;�
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. %'
3. RECEIVE JULY 9 1991 APPEALS COMMISSION�MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sap�a, to receive the July
9, 1991, Appeals Commission minutes. / --
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, IRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY.
4. OTHER BUSINESS:
The Commission members receiv an update on the Comprehensive Plan
as requested by Commissione Saba and Sielaff.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Saba, econded by Mr. Kondrick, to adjourn the
meeting. Upon a vo' e vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Betzold
declared the moti carried and the July 24, 1991, Planning
Commission adjour ed at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully �s`ubmitted,
� ����
Lyn Sa
Recordi�Secretary
1v
MEMORANDUM
- Municipal Center
S 6431 Universiry Avenue Northeast
Fridiey, Minnesota 55432
�ypF (612) 572-3507
��-Y FAX: (612) 571-1287
Memo To:
From:
BLibj ACt :
Date:
/n �� ,
william W. Burns, City Manaqer �, �
R!1ll1aII1 C. H11IIt
Assistant to the City Manager
1Pilliam C. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manaqer
Ordinance Amendinq Section 2.03.07 of the
Fridley City Charter
Auqust 13, 1991
�,�
�
At their meeting of July 22, 1991 the Fridley City Council held a
public hearing regarding an ordinance amending Section 2.03.07 of
the Fridley City Charter. This section of the Charter relates to
the amount of deviation allowed between wards upon redistricting.
The amendment would change the allowed deviation from one percent
to three percent of the average ward's population.
At their meeting of August 12, 1991, the Fridley City Council
approved the ordinance amending Section 2.03.07 of the Fridley City
Charter by a unanimous vote. The second reading of the ordinance
is proposed for the consideration of the Council at its
August 26, 1991 meeting.
WCH/jb
ORDINANCE NO.
l�ilJ ORDINANCE AMENDING BECTION 2.03.07
OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CBARTER
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
That the following section of the Fridley City Charter be amended
as follows:
Section 2.03.07
7. The boundaries of the three (3) wards shall be redetermined
from time to time by ordinance duly adopted by the Council,
and based on the findings of the Council that the wards so
redetermined are such that the population of any ward shall
not deviate by more than three percent (3 $) from the average
of the three (3) wards.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL �F THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1991.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
�
� _
�
Community Development Department
G DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: August 23, 1991
TO: William Burns, City Manager 11��
�'
FROM:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a
Vacation, SAV #91-01, by Eugene and Jean
Hagberg, Located in Block 23, Hyde Par�c
At the August 12, 1991 meeting, the City Council at the request of
the City Attorney tabled action on this item until the Attorney
could analyze the information gained from questioning the property
owners. I have spoken with the City Attorney, and he has asked me
to relay the following to the City Council (his recommendation
reinforces his previous thoughts on this matter expressed in the
June 11 and July 17, 1991 memos).
Herrick stated that it is possible that a court, given the
conflicting testimony regarding the amount of alley usage, could
determine that the alley has been used by prescription (refer to
Herrick's August 9, 1991 memo). Herrick also stated that if the
City Council vacates the alley as requested without approval from
Mr. Measner, that there may be a basis for damages (Measner would
have to prove this in a court action) . Should the City Council
wish to approve the vacation request, Measner would have to be
provided a driveway to his lot. In return, Measner should sign a
waiver which would prevent any future claim against the City.
The cost of construction of a driveway ranges from $1,000 -$1,250.
Mr. Measner states that his first priority is a garage; either a
tuck-under garage facing the street or a detached garage in the
rear. His second priority is access to his lot. He would agree
to the vacation only if he could be assured of a permit to build
a garage as well as construction of a driveway.
We have investigated the options to construct a garage on Measner's
property. A tuck-under garage is possible, but it would be very
expensive since the house would have to be lifted 2- 3 feet in
order to achieve proper drainage to 2 1/2 Street. More than
likely, the cost of such a type of construction would exceed
$10,000 to $15,000. A detached garage in the rear of the property
would not be possible due to a variety of reasons. First, the
Hagberg SAV
August 23, 1991
Page 2
width of the lot is only 40 feet. While a garage could be
constructed with the door facing south, it would be 20 feet long
and thereby leaving only 17 feet to drive the car into the garage.
It is not possible to maneuver the car back out of the garage with
this short amount of distance. Constructing a detached garage
facing west, or toward the alley, is prevented due to the change
of slope in the property. The house is 4' - 5' lower than the
elevation of the alley. Significant filling would have to occur
at the rear of the home in order to achieve the proper 25 foot
setback from the alley.
PlanninQ Commission Recommendation
At its June 19, 1991 meeting, the Planning Commission unanimously
recommended denial of the vacation request.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Corumission recommendation.
If the City Council chooses to approve the vacation, first reading
of the ordinance should be subject to the following:
1. Mr. Measner should si.gn an agreement agreeing to the vacation
and waiving his right to file action against the City.
2. The petitioner shall prepare a 10 foot drainage and utility
easement to be retained over the vacated alley.
3. The petitioner shall pay for the preparation and installation
of a dead-end alley sign to be placed at an agreed-upon
location along the alley.
BD/dn
M-91-625
3A
INCf�u�NT�REPORT
C.,� « 9 1-126 15 1
FRIDLEY POIiCE OEPARTMENT M�Z��
OffENSE ON tNC10ENT
PARKING owr� S M� W TH F
pATE REPOriTEO TtME RECEIVED T�ME 013PATCMEO TII�/E ARRIVEO T16AE COM?LETE� ///
08/21/91 1623 1631 164b Heo: e- �aeto F�
OA�E OCCYAREO �� �V��� " /J
_ P - phoee
ri.wce oF oGCUnner+CE oao •
d� �
Peter ponald Measner (14/�5/fifi
IqME AOORESS V►10NE
5834 2 1/2 Street 571-2279 _
IUSINESS AOONESS �
11EPOATEO BY
A • �1a�w
R 1 - tn persoe
Y - vlsual
M - �ail
T - other
AOO�iESS � --
q�sn s
ofF�c.�n �ssu�EO souno'
ISN UOC
�►uc��+r vKUE:
P fuhl kmw 2t�24 vwi.uE of oMU►a�:
�ss�snHCS ofF�c�cs� auwp �novK
� v� �ECOVe�o:
M1IESTEO/5115PECT(S) OR OESCRIPTION TMIE OF AME:
�.
2. ppe
WITNESSES A��� ���
�
OETA0.5 Of HiC10ENT: /1001TIONl1l 11ErONTx
Complainant wanted us aware of a vehicle, 555-CNB, which was completely blocking the alley.
Complainant wants us aware this happens every so often, so he is forced to leave his propert}
by driving over a neighbor's parking lot. Vehicle in question moved upon my arrival.
Copy to S�.zve Barg or Planning Commission./kmw
��` -�_� ',
���� , ��!' � . _ � , _ . � ," -
�,-1<<f _.S r _ �<_ <: <. .._. � -�-/', -f- --�._�_ � . ,_ ,/� -. , --
_ ( .__�_
!� 1 :,� ��� ! L �. . �1.r� � � � T .- �a. _ _ / � � - � �� �/ /
I ��'r "`l° UJ- .�C /\�� 'J� ✓t�:lti. ,/
�`/�. � r., �. F'..
�? '- z I C� �-'-�i. i n.7 �� t � � 1�. c � f � � J��/ ' / / / / /
' � � , , , , , I I � �,�..c_ �c_ ;� i cl -�t`qT _C � —!Z� t �, L� �/f
E' / G. G
�' °`cI c ti.c'i L< /-�, � � / S' �
i
_� �� � / /
. � .. s� t'G�! !�LC. L'•_l. G� / C�. G / / /
�% � j Q: �"a� S C 1 �� . i L�Gl'G ( G�
C- �1 � C �� (�s! l
� �� Y �• �q . �5 -�l. :s � . , � �? � �
�
3B '
=��__
�
Fr'.'pt9 E:HRtJG GU�'�' Lf14.� f•7F'L_. _. _.1'a`±1 1"41 F. _
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Barb Dacy
FROM: Virgil HerriGk
RE: Public and Private Rights in Allay E�samcnts
DATE: Atiguat 9 � 1991.
I am writing this memorandurn in response to our telephone
conversatton of August 4, �991. It is partially in response to
questions raisad by oouncilman Fitzpatrick, and a].so for_general.
irtfc7rm2�tii�n fvt members of the p12�nning department.
The �aats, as I undaretand them, in the prapossd all.ey vaca�ian
invalving ldr. Meisner are as fallows:
1. �he alley in questian was areated by a dEdication on a
plat.
2. The city has not opened ar establisbed or maintainad an
alloy on thQ Q�iaomant�.
3. MY`. Meisner h�s been using �he a11Gy easement for
aavess ta hia praperty.
4. Other ad j �tcent pi operty owners have used the alley foz�
access to their properties for a number of years, the
exact numb�r ig nat kriown at this time.
�. The city has a pc�tition flf adjacenti property owners
asking ta have the alley vaaat�d.
W27ert t27e City accepts a, plat, it obtains an easern�nt far streets,
alleys, parks and other public �reas that arc� dedicated in Giie
plat. The City holds the easement in trust for the general
public for the �urpvses indicat�d in the plat. In t2ie instant
cas� tne pl�t snowea a dedicatior� fo� a pur�lic: ali�y. The ci�y
�hus tzolds an easeni�nt far the purpose of �stablishing an alley
�i� that lacation.
Ti1� Mirntieso�a Supreaie Court in th� case of Vill�� of Me,�fo -d v�.
I�ilsan, 230 N.vJ.2d 458, stiated na fa1loV�s:
"It Ytas set a Iaw in Minnesota that, wYten r� s�zeet ��
dedicat�d by a plat, a City may choose its awn tima to
accupy, open and use the s�reet. Un�il the Ci�y does
�o, suoh property may be used by the abutting
landowner. Such use �s not reg�rded a� hastil� and
3C
Ff'�if9 BGRtJ�; ��!I�'r LHi,i 'r1F�r. _. �.1�51 1�:�1 F. 3
will not ap�xate as an ab�ndanmerit of a public a�roat
by the City. ��
In the above situatian the city hae noti chosan to opan or
establish the alley less aaaording to the d9C�3�0I1 isl the MedPard
caae the �djoining property ownars can use the alley for priv�te
purposes until such as the City dc�termines that it wapts to
establish, improve and maintain an alley on the easement. As I
undarstand the �acts, the City has not yet made a deterntination
ta apen and establish r�n alley an the easement in questfon.
There are o�h�r methode og establishing streets r�»d nlleys thAt
somewhat campl.ioate the questivn in this case. An allay ann be
estztbiishad by aomman law dedic:ation or �� tx prescriptive
�asement.
Common l�w dedic;�tion requires (1) an intent on the part r�f tha
�wner to d�dicats land �o public use; (2) an action by the own�r
indicativ� vf the intgntion, and; (3j acceptance by the pubiic.
in this case it would appear.th�t the awrier or tha prapexty, at
�he time of filing the pls� int�snd�d that a part of tihe p�.at be
dediCated ar an alley and by filing the pl��. iridicated such
f r,ten� ian .
Public acceptance of a roadway may b� established by a
camparatively amall number qf pe�sens. See Q�uqhertv va. Sowera
68 N.w.2d s66. It is pvssible that this alley has b�com� a putblic
raadway �ay comman law dadication. Froiu the information that I
have it appears that Che nll�y ha6 been accep�ed and used by
various proper�y awners.
The right ta use an alley may alsa be creat�d by r, prescriptive
�aaement. see t�uis ve. Fulle?-, 22o N.w.2d 245. The analy6es a�
prescriptive easement i.s similar to adverse possessfon but with
same diff�rence. Craation vf a prescriptfve easement must be
hostile, und�x a claim og right, actual, open, continuous, and
eXClUsfve. The prascriptiv� Period is 15 years. The use af an
alley Por vver zo years YYas k�ec�n held to give ris� to a right-o�-
way by pre�uri��ion, �ry�r vs. Kistl�, 136 ?d.�`. 750. It would
apgear thati rto sfngle property owr�er ha�s acquirad A pxescriptive
right ta use the alley in as much as it appears that the general
public aras using �iie alley. The�efore the property owners use
�i�s nat exelusive conclusivn. Tt w�uld b� he1�Pu1 to ob�ain
additianal in�orma�ion regard3ng the extient oP use af th� ality
und th� period oP time that it was usea by adjacent property
ri�ners. subject to obtaining that additiional �t1S�armation iti is
my prelimin�ry apinion tiht►C �in �illey has been created by comman
law dc�dicatioti. If tha� �'emains the conalusion then property
awners adjacen� to the alley, including Mr. Meisner would be
enGitled tv damages if the alley were vaGated.
The plati�ing ot property in Minnesotia is reyulated by str�tute,
Minn. srat. y505.01 provides as �ollows:
3D
FRiJFi c":N��IJ1+ G'���4� �H(,� P1FL �, £. . igyl 1`:4�' F. 4
In �'e Ma iritananc�`�E Road Areas , eta .
"Plats oP land may be made in accordanae with the provisiona
of this ahaptc�r, and, when ao made and recorded, every
dona�ion tia the public vr any person vr carporation noted
thareon sYiall operatie tio cotzvey �he f�e o� a�.l land so
danated, Por the uses and purposes t�amed or intended, with
the same eYfect, upon the donar and his heir�, and in favor
qf the donee, as though such la�nd wera conveyed by warranty
dead. Land donated Par any public use in any munfcipality
shall be held in the corporate name in trust for the
puXposes ae� Eor�h or intQndod.
Tiie r i 1 ing
c�nveyanee
streets as
dedi�atiot�
nece�sary.
af tha plat pursuant to �505.01 operatea as a
ta the public of such estat� or inte�esti in the
i� neceasary to accomplish thQ Purpas� of the
and no acceptarice by the gaverning bady is
We pointi auti that the mere piatt�.ng of the land did nat
in�tantly create an obliqation upan the town baArd to open
artd maintain the dedicated atreete. our CASes have�
consistently held that the municipality may determine �he
time it will opan a street and assume the mainten�nce.
tihereaf."
Minnesota supreme caurt !n the c�►se of Vi23.�,ae og Mgd�ord v.
���, 230 N.W.2d 456, stated a� follcsws:
�'Y�. is set�l�d ].aw in Minnesota that, when a street is
dedicatfsd by pltit� a aity m�y chooae its own time �o occupy,
open, and use the stre�ti. until tha city dv�s so, such
praperty may be used by the abutting 1.andawner. 3uch use is
not ragarded as hostil.e and will nat vpgrate ar an
aUandonmEnt of a public str�et by thc city.•'
3E
612 780 1777
F�OM RARNR GU2V LAW MPLS.
TO:
FRQM:
RE :
DATE:
Barb Dacy
7.19.1991 16�10
M E M O R A N D U M
Virqil Herrick
;
rJ� �!�-
Al1ey VaCation - iiyde Pnrk
JUly 17, 1991
This �s a follow up to my previous memorandum to you regarding
the above subjoct.
P. 2
ou ask whether, if th�
Zn your memo of July 3, 1991, in item 5, Y Would have to p�►Y
city were to vacate a portion of the alley theY
Mr. Misner ior the cost nf �e wouldrbe�responsib].eiforaanY As I
indicated previously, �hg clty ro ��,t . This would be
decrease in value tia �th�Mvalue of the Misner property with the
determined by finding without
alley acces� arid de�hg�digferencevinuthesettwo figures would be
the alley access.
the damages that Nir. Misner would b� uallto�or lesstthan�the�
cons�ructing the driveway woul.d be eq for the
damages iigure, the city cduld offer to eonstruct an�ur��Y� claim
driveway in retu�n Eor Mr. Misner's release of any
against the city for the alley vacation.
Y olicy question.
Whe�her the ci�y should vacate the alle is a p
However, be�ore the counc�l wewhat thekdamage figu�l�Orlthe I
�hink they would like ti� know
Misner property entai�s. It the cvuncil determines to go ah�ad
with the vacation, the stasonablelagreement�b tweenihimranddthe
attempt �o negotiate a rea
city.
3F
Virgil C. Herrick
James D�. Hoeft
Gregg V. Herrick
Of C��unsel
David P. Newman
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
lH[IEIf�i$.�[��� � 1��,�Gayr1���'�
—.�-----
�
ATTORi�I�YS A'I' I,AW
M E M O R A N D U M
I
i,
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant ni��1�
Virgil Herrick, City Attorney dU
June 11, 1991
Vacation Request by Eugene and Jean Hagberg
This memorandum is in response to your memo of May 31, 1991. In
your memorandum you discuss the possibility of vacating a portion
of an alley in Block 23, Hyde Park. As I interpret the material
that you furnished me, a majority of the people adjacent to the
alley are in favor of the vacation. However, one, Mr. Meisner, is
presently using the alley for access to the rear of his lot for
parking purposes.
The Planning Commission asked two questions:
1. Will City action on the vacation request constitute a
taking if it prevents access to Mr. Meisner's property?
2. Has there been precedent for the City to pay legal fees
incurred by the property owner to record an access agreement?
The general rule regarding a vacation of a right-of-way is that
if a property owner is damaged by the vacation, he is entitled to
compensation. The vacation of an alley constitutes a taking of
part of the property owner's property rights. It is similar to a
condemnation action and the measure of damages is the same; that
is, the difference in value of the property before the vacation
and the difference in value of the property after the vacation.
Based on the information contained in the discussion before the
Planning Commission, it would be my opinion that there is a very
good possibility that the vacation would constitute a taking as
far as Mr. Meisner is concerned. It would be my suggestion that
one of the alternatives discussed by the Planning Commission be
implemented before the alley is vacated. If this is not done,
the City could be liable for damages to Mr. Meisner. If an
alternative solution to his access problem is obtained, I would
then suggest that Mr. Meisner be asked to sign an agreement that
he is in favor of the vacation.
Suice 205, 6�4U1 IJniversity Ad•enu� 1�. 3G °.`�. ;�fii�nc-soca 5�43?, til �-57]-.�ti ;�s
Memo to Michele McPherson
June 11, 1991
Page 2
I am not aware of any precedent for the City to pay legal fees
incurred by a property owner to record an access agreement.
However, the amount of fees involved in this would be minimum.
If there were to be an access easement partially on Meisner's
property and partially on the adjoining property, this would
involve preparing two Quit Claim Deeds with cross-easements. The
one easement would have to be signed by Mr. Meisner and his wife,
if he has one; the other would have to be signed by the adjacent
property owner. If either property has a mortgage, the mortgage
company would have to assent to the granting of the easement. I
would estimate that the entire cost of preparing the easement
agreements and recording them with the county would not exceed
$200.00. ��
I trust that the above answers your questions. If not, please
contact me.
VCH:ldb
3H
`-;,,�
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22 1991 PAGE 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS•
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON A VACATION SAV #91-01 BY EUGENE AND JEAN
�GBERG. TO VACATE THE 12 FOOT ALLEY IN BLOCK 23 HYD. PARK
FOR A DISTANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 243 FEE SOUTH OF THE SOUTH
LINE OF 59TH AVENUE GENERALLY LOCATED NOR OF 58TH AVENUE
SOUTH OF 59TH AVENUE. EAST OF 2ND STREET. AND WEST OF 2-1f2
STREET:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
opened at 7:39 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that tl�ris is a
request to vacate the north 243 feet of a 12 foot alley located
north of 58th Avenue, south of 59th Avenue, east of 2nd Street and
west of 2-1/2 Street. She stated that the vacation is requested
by the property owners as they have experienced a lot of nuisances
such as parking and illegal dumping in the alley.
Ms. Dacy stated that the purpose of an alley is to provide access
for vehicles, utilities, and emergency vehicles. She stated that
all the properties in this block, except for Mr. Measner's
property, have access to abutting streets. She stated that a
utility easement could be retained, and that the Police and Fire
Departments did not need access from the alley for emergency
purposes. She stated that the main issue is vehicular access.
Ms. Dacy stated that the main purpose for vacating the alley is for
the alley to be under the ownership of adj acent property owners and
to eliminate the nuisances they have been experiencing. She stated
that in Mr. Measner's case there would not be 100 percent
guaranteed access. ' � �
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission explored two optio�s.
She stated that one option was to determine if Mr. Measner could
obtain a permanent easement from the property owners at 5851 2nd
Street or 5846 2-1/2 Street. She stated that the property owners
were not in favor of this option. Ms. Dacy stated that another
option was the creation of a driveway from 2-1/2 Street to Mr.
Measner's home.
Ms. Dacy stated that when 2-1/2 Street was improved a curb cut was
not allowed for this property. She stated that she understands it
is not possible to build a tuck-under garage, and that the only
possibility for construction of a garage is to the rear of Mr.
Measner's home.
31
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MRETINQ OF JIILY 22 1991 PAGE 3
Ms. Dacy stated the Assessor's Office has noted that the property
would decline in value if the alley is vacated, as it removes an
option for access to Mr. Measner's property.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial of
this vacation request.
Councilman Billings asked how Mr. Measner now accesses his
property.
Mr. Measner stated that he drives through the alley both from the
north and from the south.
Councilman Billings asked if the north portion of the alley were
vacated, how would this impact Mr. Measner's ability to get in and
out of his back yard.
Mr. Measner stated that there is not enough turning width without
pulling onto the north half of the alley.
Coenri �h 2431 feets were v cat d if this would give�MrnSMeasner
th
the extra space he needed.
Mr. Measner stated that he would then only have access from the
south.
Councilman Billings stated that he drove through the alley and that
it is not very open from the south. He stated that to exit to the
north he had to drive through tree branches. He stated that it
looked like the ruts were almost non-existent on the north end of
the alley.
Mr. Measner stated that he is trying to keep the access to the
north at a minimum because the property owners do not like it.
Councilman Billings asked Mr. Measner if he was primarily using the
south portion of the alley for access. Mr. Measner answered in the
affirmative.
Ms. Jean Hagberg, 5881 2nd Street, stated that it seems this
vacation is based on whether Mr. Measner is going to have access
to his property if he cannot park his vehicle in the front of his
home. She stated that it seems the only way he is guaranteed
access is if the City maintains the alley, as there is no way a
snowplow can get in the alley in the winter.
Ms. Hagberg stated that if the owner of the apartment building
constructs a fence there is no way Mr. Measner can get in and out
of his property. She stated that the only other access is to allow
him to park in his front yard.
3J
BRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL ME$TING OF JIILY 22. 1991 PAGE 4
Councilman Billings asked if the City plows alleys in the City.
Mr. Flora stated that only if the alley is surfaced. He stated
that the City only has about nine miles of surfaced alleys, and
those were installed due to petitions from the property owners.
Councilman Billings stated that the question is if the City can
require Mr. Measner to park in the front yard, if a curb cut is
provided, and if access is taken in the back, is the City liable.
Mr. Gregq Herrick, representinq the City Attorney�s Office, stated
that if the City restricts the ability of the property owner to
utilize the back yard, it will reduce the value of the property so
an argument could be made on Mr. Measner's behalf that the
Council's action has affected his property value. He stated that
he understands the only location for a qarage is in the back yard,
and if access is not allowed to the area it would prohibit Mr.
Measner from constructing a garage.
Ms. Dacy stated that the issue is Mr. Measner�s ability to access
a garage if one was constructed.
Ms. Hagberg stated that in order for Mr. Measner to access his
property he has to back onto part of the property on which the
apartment building is located. She stated that there isn't room
to construct a garage in the back and be able to get in and out.
Mayor Nee asked the width of the lot, and Mr. Measner stated it was
40 feet.
Councilman Billings stated that if the north half of the alley were
vacated, and Mr. Mea�ner used the south portion for access, it
would mean the property owners to the south could never vacate the
south half of the alley. .
Ms. Hagberg stated that she talked to the owners of the apartments,
and it was stated that they would.not request a vacation because
they would not have a place to stack their snow.
Councilman Fitzpatrick asked if Mr. Measner was using the south
portion of the alley for access in the winter.
Mr. Measner stated that he just moved to his home in February.
Ms. Cheryl Williamette, 6004 2-1/2 Street, stated that she was the
previous owner of Mr. Meas�er's home. She stated that in the
winter they shoveled and then used the south half of the alley for
access. She stated that the alley has overgrown a lot since she
lived there and felt that to improve the alley would be best for
everyone. She stated that the alley was really all the access they
had to the property. Ms. Williamette stated that a curb cut was
not allowed when the street was improved because they actually had
3K
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 22, 1991 PAG$ 5
to provide access to a garage, and also that parking in the yard
was not allowed.
Mr. Reider, 5875 2nd Street, stated that he has a legal concern
about someone getting hurt in the alley and who would be liable.
He stated that he did not want to be held accountable for a ppaper"
alley. He stated that the property owners wished to stop the
traffic in the alley and have some privacy. He stated that he has
lived in his home for three years, and the alley is not maintained
by anyone. Mr. Reider felt that if the apartment owners wanted to
vacate the south end they would have attended these meetings on
the vacation request. He stated that he felt the six property
owners to the north would r►ot be in favor of improvements because
they did not want to pay higher taxes.
Mr. Reider stated that if Mr. Measner was provided with off=street
parking and access from the south half of the alley he would have
two accesses. He stated that vacation of the north half of the
alley would make him responsible for this property, and he could
fence it or leave it open in order to make it safe.
Councilman Billings stated that the entire alley could not be
vacated because it denies Mr. Measner access to his backyard, and
the only other choice is to improve the alley and assess those
costs to the property owners.
Councilman Schneider asked what prompted the property owners to
request the vacation of this alley.
Mr. Reider stated that the alley was not being used by any drive
through traffic, but teenagers are using the alley and disposing
of their trash. He stated that the only way to alleviate some of
the problems is to vacate the alley.
Ms. Judy Konsela, 5828 2-1/2 Street, stated that she has lived here
for eight years, and there has always been traffic in the alley.
She stated that if Mr. Measner is allowed to park in his front
yard, it would block her view in the front of her home and decrease
the value of her property. She stated that there is vehicular
traffic, motor bikes, bikes, and pedestrians using the alley.
Ms. Becky Street, 5825 2nd Street, she stated that there are woods
behind her home and a lot of partying. She stated that there is
apartment traffic through her yard, and when the snow was plowed
at the apartment building it was plowed into her yard, causing her
to lose several trees. She stated that her concern is where the
snow would be placed if the alley is vacated. She stated that the
major problem seems to be the disturbances and felt these will be
shifted from the north to the south if the north half of the alley
is vacated. She stated that if the alley is improved she would be
assessed and, as a single homeowner, she could not afford this
expense.
3L
FRIDLEY CZTY CODNCIL MEETING OF JOLY 22. 1991 PAGE 6
Ms. Eileen Reider, 5875 2nd Street, stated that she had been
cleaning the alley but has not done so the last several weeks.
She invited the Councilmembers to come and look at the alley.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at�8:27 p.m.
2. PUBLIC HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.05 OF THE f
�'RIDLEY CITY CHARTER: ;
/
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the ublic
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Sec ded by
Councilwoman Jorqenson. IIpon a voice vote, all voting ye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the p ic hearing
opened at 8:3o p.m.
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, state that the Charter
Commission is proposing an amendment to Chap r 2.05 of the City
Charter relating to the manner in which va ncies on the Council
that occur between elections are fill . He stated that,
basically, the amendment divides vacanci into two classes; those
which occur within the first three year of a term and those which
occu-r �n the fourth year of a term He stated that there is
another division regarding one, wo, or three simultaneous
vacancies and four or more simult eous vacancies.
Mr. Iiunt stated that there is problem with the present wording
of the Charter. It states tha if there are four or more vacancies
the remaining members shall, by unanimous vote, raise the Council
up to four. He stated tha there is some question on whether that
is possible if there wer four simultaneous vacancies because at
most there would only b one remaining member, not members.
Mr. Hunt stated that ince this language was written, the terms of
oftice or �ttie Coun ' 1 have: changed from three to four �years. He
stated the Chart Commission is proposing that if there is a
vacancy in the f' st three years of a term, the remaining members
of the Council ould call a special election. He stated that if
a vacancy occ rred in the fourth year of the term, the Council
would have e option of appointment. He stated that if the
vacancy is ithin 45 days of a General Election, then the Council
could exe ise only the option of appointment. Mr. Hunt stated
that the urpose is to give the Council more flexibility in a year
in whic an election occurs. He stated that if there are four or
more cancies, the City Manaqer would call for an election and
fill ail terms. •
Mr. Backlund, Chainaan of the Charter Commission, stated that this
proposed amendment has been discussed at length at the Charter
Commission meetings in order to make provisions for the worst
3M
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 19, 1991
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Betzold called the June 19, 1991, Pla ' g Commission
meeting to order at 7:34 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present: Don Betzold, Sue Shere , Connie Modig,
Brad Sielaff
Members Absent: Larry Kuechle, �an Saba, Dave Kondrick
Others Present: Barbara Dac , Community Development Director
Michele M herson, Planning Assistant --
Ronald enson, 5834 2-1/2 Street N.E.
Paul Eileen Reider, 5875 2nd Street N.E.
Pe Meisner, 5834 2-1/2 Street N.E.
ggy Walker, 6339 5th Street N.E.
aren Moormann, 5850 - 2-1/2 Street N.E.
MOTION.b Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Ms. Modig, to approve the May
22, 19 , Planning Commission minutes as written.
f A VOICB VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CSAIRPSRSON B$TZOLD D$CLARED
MAY 22, 1991, PLANNING COMMISSION MINOTES APPROVED AS WRITTEN.
1. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION, SAV #91-01. BY EUGENE AND JEAN
HAGBERG• �
To vacate the 12 foot alley in Block 23, Hyde Park, for a
distance of approximately 243 feet south of the south line of
59th Avenue, generally located north of 58th Avenue, south of
59th Avenue, east of 2nd Street, and west of 2-1/2 Street.
Mr. Betzold stated that this item was tabled at the last meeting
in order to obtain additional information and a legal opinion from
the City Attorney.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Modig, to remove this item
from the table.
UPON A VOICE VOTE ALL VOTING AYE CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. McPherson stated this is a request to vacate the north 243 feet
of an alley that is located in the 5800 block of 2nd and 2-1/2
Streets. She stated at the last Planning Commission meeting, there
3N
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 19 1991 PAGE 2
were several questions raised regarding the effect of this vacation
on Mr. Meisner's property, 5834 - 2 1/2 Street N.E.
Ms. McPherson stated a memo has been received from the City
Attorney, and it is his opinion that preventing access to Mr.
Meisner's property would constitute a taking. She stated the City
Attorney suggested that one of the alternatives discussed by the
Planning Commission be implemented, if the alley is vacated. She
stated the alternatives are that an access easement be obtained or
that Mr. Meisner be allowed a paved parking area in the front of
his home.
Ms. McPherson stated the apartment owners at 5851 2nd Street and
5846 2-1/2 Street were contacted to determine if they would provide
Mr. Meisner with an access easement or a place to park his vehicle
on a permanent basis. She stated both property owners indicated
they would be reluctant to provide Mr. Meisner with any type of
access easement.
Ms. McPherson stated the City Assessor, Mr. Madsen, was consulted
and it was his opinion that there would be a devaluation in the
property, if the vacation is approved. She stated Mr. Madsen felt
the property was not landlocked, but there would be no area to
provide access to a garage, should one be constructed.
Ms. McPherson stated it is staff's recommendation that Mr. Meisner
have some type of access, prior to approval of the vacation, either
by an access easement or paving the parking area in his front yard.
Mr. Ron Swenson, 5834 2-1/2 Street N.E., stated there is an alley
a block away on 60th and 2-1/2 Streets that is maintained by the
City and asked why this alley cannot be improved and maintained.
Mr. Betzold stated his position is that �f this vacation is not
approved, the City should improve the alley and pave it.
Mr. Swenson stated it seems neither the neighbors nor the City a�e
willing to pay for the improvement. He stated you cannot drive a
vehicle in the alley without it getting scratched.
Mr. Pete Meisner, 5834 2-1/2 Street N.E., stated he does need some
type of access to his property as he wants to construct a garage
at some future date. He stated if the alley is open, he can
construct a garage in the rear and, if the alley is vacated, he
would need a tuck-under garage. Mr. Meisner stated he understands
the City is not willing to consider a tuck-under garage.
Ms. McPherson stated she did not know where Mr. Meisner obtained
this information as there are several tuck-under garages on other
properties in the City. She stated unless there is a structural
problem, she could not see any reason for the City not allowing Mr.
Meisner to construct a tuck-under garage.
30
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 19, 1991 PAGE 3
Mr. Meisner stated his only concern is that he has some type of
access.
Mr. Paul Reider, 5875 2nd Street, stated he felt the off-street
parking in front of Mr. Meisner's home would give him the optimum
access. He stated he favors vacation of the north end of the alley
as it is�a drive-through and not maintained. He questioned who
is liable if someone is injured as there are children riding dirt
bikes in the alley. He stated he is concerned with the safety, and
the four landowners to the north are looking for some relief to
the activities that occur in the alley.
Mr. Betzold stated if the north end of the alley is vacated, there
has been testimony that it would be a lot more difficult for Mr.
Meisner to access through the south end. He stated also that if
the north end of the alley is vacated, there may be a request to
vacate the south end. He stated he would not like to be placed in
the position that by approving one vacation, the other one would
have to be granted. Mr. Betzold stated it seems there are problems
with any approach that is taken. He stated he reviews this from
a policy standpoint, however, the Council wou�d also get involved
in the budgeting issue, if the alley were to be improved.
Mr. Sielaff asked what constitutes adequate access and if there was
access only from the south, if this was adequate.
Ms. Dacy stated there is access from the south,�but history has
shown that this has not always been available. She stated what the
City Attorney has stated is that Mr. Meisner may have no means to
get to his property and that may constitute a taking of property.
She stated her concern is that Mr. Meisner's property is not
typical and does not have an access from the street and his sole
access is from the alley.
Ms. Peggy Walker, 633.9 5th Street N.E., stated she felt the alley
should not be vacated. She stated she has not observed vehicles
in and out of the alley, except the vehicles from the apartment
building and Mr. Reider's neighbors. She stated she felt the
apartment owners wanted the alley vacated so they can dump their
snow in this area.
Ms. Elaine Reider, 5875 2nd Street, stated she has cleaned the
alley and removed debris. She stated she has talked with property
owners regarding the alley and no one is even concerned or cares
about it. She stated she wanted the partying that goes on the
alley to stop, but wanted Mr. Meisner to have access.
Ms. Dacy stated in regard to the question of liability which was
raised by Mr. Reider, the City would be liable. She stated there
are a number of paper streets and alleys in the City that are on
the books and not improved. She stated if something happened on
3P
PLA,NNING COMMISSION MEETING. JUNE 19, 1991 PAGE 4
City owned property, anyone would have the right to file a claim.
Mr. Betzold stated if someone was injured and wanted to file a
claim, there is nothing that prohibits them from doing so.
Ms. Modig questioned how giving access to Mr. Meisner would affect
the parking at one of the.apartment buildings.
Ms. Dacy stated that in the case of the property owner to the
north, if Mr. Meisner was provided access, he would have to access
through the apartment's parking spaces. She stated the apartment
owner did not want to give up any parking spaces in order to
provide this access.
Ms. McPherson stated as far as the apartment owner to the west, the
area where Mr. Meisner would access is where the dumpster and
fencing is located.
Mr. Meisner stated he would be willing to clean the alley to a
certain extent, but was told by City staff this was not a good idea
as he would be on someone else's property. He stated he was
advised that the City would not clean the alley.
Ms. Dacy stated she knows the cleaning issue is frustrating for the
property owners. She stated the current policy is that the City
is not maintaining the alley, but as Ms. Reider testified, she has
done some cleaning in the alley. She stated she believed the
apartment owner must plow the alley for his tenants to get in and
out.
No other persons in the audience spoke reqarding this proposed
vacation request.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to close the
informal public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY, AND THE HEARING CLOSED AT 8:05 P.M.
Ms. Dacy stated if the Planning Commission chooses to recommend
approval of this vacation request, the staff recommends that the
petitioner pay for the cost of preparing and installing the dead-
end alley signs and provide a ten foot drainage and utility
easement over the vacated alley. She stated a provision should
also be made for Mr. Meisner's property for an access easement or
a paved area in the front yard so he has 100 percent access at all
times.
Mr. Betzold stated it seems the provision for an access easement
is not feasible since the apartment owners are not willing to
provide the access. He stated it seems any approach that is taken
is liable to cost the City. Iie stated he did not know how to
�l� �
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 19, 1991 PAGE 5
advise the Council as they make the spending decisions. Mr.
Betzold stated from a policy standpoint, there is a problem that
this is a nuisance and does not doubt it is an eyesore and, for
this reason, probably should be vacated.
Mr. Betzold stated, however, he cannot ignore the issue that by
approving the vacation, it would be taking property from Mr.
Meisner and he would probably have to be compensated. He stated
Mr. Meisner has already been told he cannot park on the street, but
he cannot be ordered to install a parking space in his front yard.
He stated if the north end of the alley is vacated, Mr. Meisner may
not be able to access on the south which may constitute a
depreciation in his property.
Mr. Sielaff stated he is inclined to deny the vacation request due
to all the uncertainty. --
Mr. Betzold stated he is not opposed to the vacation, however,
there are consequences if it is not vacated. He stated he felt the
best recommendation he could make is not to vacate the alley. He
felt if the alley is not vacated, the area probably should be
considered for upgrading and improvement. He stated this would
have to be the Council's decision as there would be considerable
cost involved to improve it and they may wish to leave it as it now
exists.
Ms. Sherek stated if the vacation is going to cause a hardship to
a person who is not a party to the vacation request, she would not
be in favor of it.
MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend to City
Council denial of Vacation Request, SAV #91-01, by Eugene and Jean
Hagberg, to vacate the 12 foot alley in Block 23, Hyde Park, for
a distance of approximately 243 feet south of the south line of
59th Avenue, generally located north of 58th Avenue, south of 59th
Avenue, east of 2nd Street, and west of 2-1/2 Street.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Ms. Dacy stated the City Council will hold the public hearing on
this vacation request on July 22, 1991, but action on the request
will not take place until the Council's first meeting in August.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPE L USE PERMIT SP
�91-07, BY BIZAL, INC.:
Per Section 205.18.03.C(4) of t Fridley City Code, to
increase the maximum lot cover e from 40� to 42.50 on Lot 1,
Block 3, East Ranch Estates ond Addition, generally located
at 7880 Ranchers Road N. .
3R
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 22, 1991
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Betzold called the May 22, 1991, Planning ommission
meeting to order at 7:40 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Fresent: Don Betzold, Dave Kondri , Brad Sielaff,
Larry Kuechle (for Dia Savage)
Members Absent: Dean Saba, Sue She k, Connie Modig
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, ommunity Development Director
Michele McP rson, Planning Assistant
Steven Ba , Planning Assistant
Jean Ha erg, 5881 - 2nd Street N.E.
James eterson, 7995 Broad Avenue
See ttached list
MOTION by . Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to approve the
May 8, 1, Planning Commission minutes as written.
�A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERBON BETZOLD DECLARED
MAY 8, 1991, PLANNING COMMISSION MINQTES APPROVED AS WRITTEN.
1. CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION RE4UEST. SAV #91-01, BY EUGENE
AND JEAN HAGBERG•
To vacate the 12 foot alley in Block 23, Hyde Park, for a
distance of approximately 243 feet south of the south line of
59th Avenue, generally located north of 58th Avenue, south of
59th Avenue, east of 2nd Street, and west of 2 1/2 Street.
Ms. McPherson stated this is the 243 feet directly south of 59th
Avenue. The alley is not improved, and all the properties in this
general area are zoned S-1, Hyde Park. Alleys serve the public in
three ways: They provide: (1) vehicular access; (2) location for
utilities; and (3) access for emergency vehicles. In this
particular instance, all the properties except one, 5834 - 2 1/2
Street, just south of where the vacation request ends, have access
from either 2nd Street or 2 lf2 Street.
Ms. McPherson stated the City has several advantages for vacating
the alley. It will remove from the public responsibility part of.
3S
pT.a�ING COMMIBSION ![EETIIdG. lIAY 22. 1991 PAGE 2
an alley that the City cannot maintain, transferring the
maintenance responsibilities to the adjacent homeowners directly
abutting the alley. It would also potentially remove nuisances of
partying and iZlegal dumping of materials.
Ms. McPherson stated the property owner, Pete Meisner, who depends
on the alley for access could potentially still have access from
58th Avenue, which is the�south entzance ta the alley, or if he
could come to some type of agreement with the apartment building
directly to the west of him at 5851 - 2nd Street, he would still
have access to his property.
Ms. McPherson stated there are several disadvantages to vacating
the alley. In the past, the Council has preferred 100$ agreement
for vacating an alley or street. Included in the aqenda packet
are minutes alluding to a 1963 alley vacation in which the petition
was to vacate a portion of an alley; and in the process of review,
the entire alley, without 200� agreement, was vacated. However,
the original petition for the portion of the alley was 100$ agreed
upon by those persons directly abutting the alley, the same as this
current request.
Ms. McPherson stated that in 1980, a similar request to vacate all
of the alley in Block 7, Hyde Park, was approved by the City. In
that instance, a petition with 100� of the adjacent property owners
was submitted. In the Hyde Park neighborhood, there are two
partially vacated alleys and four entirely vacated alleys.
Ms. McPherson stated vacating a portion of the alley creates an
alley that has a deadend which would require that someone driving
into the alley would have to back out the same way he/she entered
the alley. With only one entrance to the alley, access would be
prohibited should someone park in the south area of the alley, and
this would prohibit the access of Mr. Meisner's property.
Ms. McPherson stated a third opportunity for access to Mr.
Meisner's property would be for the City to allow a parking area
to be paved in his front yard. However, in reviewing the building
file in 1978, apparently City staff told the previous property
owners that they could not use a curb cut in their front yard, even
though the Code allows parking in the required front yard if the
parking does occur on a hard surface.
Ms. McPherson stated that in evaluating the request based on the
three public purposes (vehicular access, emergency vehicle access,
and location for utilities), the only requirement that is not met
is the fact that the access to Mr. Meisner's property could
potentially he hlocked. There are NSP overhead wires in the alley;
however, a 10 foot drainage/utility easement submitted by the
petitioners would still allow access by the utility company to
repair and maintain their lines. The Fire Department does not
3T
PLANNING COMMIS$ION MEETING. MAY 22, 1991 PAGE 3
require the alley for emergency access, so the remaining issue is
to ensure that Mr. Meisner has guaranteed access to his property.
Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending to the Planning
Commission that this vacation request not be granted until Mr.
Meisner has guaranteed access to his property, either by an
easement agreement with the property owner of 5851 - 2nd Street,
the apartment building directly to the west of his property, or by
the City allowing him to pave a parking area in the front yard.
If either option does occur, staff would recommend the portion of
the alley be vacated as requested, the north 243 feet, with two
stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall pay for the cost of preparing and
installing the deadend alley signs.
2. The petitioner shall provide a 10 foot drainage and
utility easement over the vacated alley.
Ms. McPherson stated staff is also recommending that perhaps the
Planning Commission might want to discuss the policy issue of
vacating part or all of alleys in general and make a recommendation
to City Council.
Mr. Betzold asked how access to Mr. Meisner's property is being
denied.
Ms. McPherson stated that Mr. Meisner's house has no garage and no
driveway from 2 1/2 Street. In order for Mr. Meisner to remove his
vehicle from the street, he uses the alley to park in his rear yard
on the grass. On occasion he has had to call the City to say that
someone has piled brush in the alley or someone has parked in the
alley which prevents him from accessing his property.
Mr. Kuechle asked if there is any record for the number of parties
or disturbances that would indicate a good reason to vacate the
alley.
Ms. Dacy stated the Police Department has records, but staff does
not have that information for the meeting.
Ms. Jean Hagberg, 5881 - 2nd Street, stated that they have lived
at this address since 1964. Until last year, the alley has not
been drivable, because of high ruts. In the last year, they have
had NSP cut down trees, and the neighbors cleaned up the alley.
They also hauled in dirt to fill in the ruts, because they had
plans for vacating the alley on their end.
Ms. Hagberg stated their reasons for wanting to vacate the alley
is because of the kids that go back there and party, because of
broken glass, cans, beer bottles, and other debris, and cars
driving through the alley at 2:00-3:00 a.m.
3U
pLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, Ml�Y 22. 1991 PAGE 4
Mr. Paul Reider, 5875 - 2nd Street, stated that he owns the
property adjoining the Hagbergs. He stated snowplowing is a
concern of his since this alley has never been plowed. This alley
has no gravel on it, and it is very muddy when it rains. At this
point in time, he did not expect the City to come in and spend any
of his tax dollars to improve it. Six months out of the year, the
alley is filled with snow. If the alley was plowed, what would
happen to the snow? T� his knowledge, the alley has not been used
for garbag�e re�aoval or fire access. He believed it would be a win-
win situation for the City to not spend any money improving this
property, and he would condone giving Mr. Meisner off-street
parking in his front yard. Mr. Meisner's lot is very small, but
he could have access to his rear yard from the south end of the
alley and from the front. He did not want to cause a hardship for
anyone.
Mr. Meisner stated there are no lights in any of the alleys that
the City is not maintaining. So, it is very dark back there. He
stated he walked down to the 5900 block where 1/2 of the alley is
vacated. He did not see one sign saying "deadend". He did not
see any signs saying "end of street" or any barricades. He asked
some people if there were any problems with the vacation of the
alley, and there did not appear to be any problems. Regarding snow
removal, they said they are at the discretion of the apartment
building to piow them out. He did not understand that, because he
is under the impression that he is not allowed to plow an alleyway
with his personal vehicle. The people in the 5900 block told him
of similar problems with the alley because of the darkness, a place
for kids to party, and trying to keep the alley clean.
Mr. Reider stated that if one-half of the alley is vacated, they
will stop people from using it for a shortcut and for parties and
it will stop the garbage that is ongoing. The broken glass is a
big problem, and who is liable if someone gets cut while playing
in the alley? If the alley is ta be kept open, then he thought
lights are essential for security reasons.
Mr. Betzold asked if vacating the northern one-half of the alley
would preclude the vacation of the southern one-half in the future.
Ms. Dacy stated that if the neighbors submitted a petition to
vacate and had 100$ agreement from the adjacent property owners,
then she did not see how the vacation of the northern half could
preclude the vacation of the southern half.
Ms. Dacy stated staff's recammendation is based on the objective
to get the access issue resolved for Mr. Meisner or any future
owner af his property. The record is not clear as to why the City
denied the former property owner the ability to have a curb cut off
that street in 1978 when the Code does allow it. They do not know
if the property owner of the apartment building would be willing
3V
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, MAY 22, 1991 PAGE 5
to record an access easement in perpetuity across their property
to allow Mr. Meisner access.
Mr. Pete Meisner stated that he has to have some type of access to
his property. He is willing to work with the apartment building
owner to get an easement as long as it is in writing.
Mr. Kondrick asked how Mr. Meisner felt about a parking area in
his front yard.
Mr. Meisner stated a parking area in his front yard would take up
almost his entire front yard. He would prefer to have access to
the rear of his property.
Mr. Betzold stated a third option for access to Mr. Meisner's rear
yard is to come through the alley from the south. �
Mr. Meisner stated the only problem with that is that he would have
to drive in forward and then back out. He would still have to
drive on a part of the northern part of the alley.
Mr. Betzold asked about snow removal in the wintertime.
Ms. Cheryl Williamette, 6004 - 2 1/2 Street, stated she is the
previous owner of Mr. Meisner's property. She stated they had a
big truck and they plowed the alley themselves. They always parked
two vehicles in the back yard. She stated that in 1978 when the
City came in and tore up the old streets and put in new streets and
curbs, they decided they would like to put a parking area in the
front yard. She stated the property is on a hill, and there is no
way you can guarantee that a vehicle parked on the hill in the
wintertime is not going to slide down the hill. So, it is not an
option unless they dig into the hill, and there is water and sewer
on part of the property. At one time, she and her husband tried
to see if they could put a drive-around to get to the rear of the
house, but there is not enough room on either side of the house.
Ms. Dacy asked Ms. Williamette if she remembered why the City did
not allow a curb cut in 1978.
Ms. Williamette stated the City said it was because they could not
park in front of the house, that they needed some access around the
house.
Ms. Judy Konselo, 5828 - 2 1/2 Street, stated she owns the property
next to Mr. Meisner. She stated she uses the alley to the south,
and in the wintertime, the snow from the apartment building parking
lots is stacked at the end of the alley, so access to the south for
Mr. Meisner is not possible in the wintertime.
Ms. Dacy stated that given these particular circumstances, staff
thought the option for a driveway in Mr. Meisner's front yard
3W
PLANNING COIrIIdIBBION KEETING, l�iAY 22, 1991 PAGE 6
should be reconsidered. The lot is only 40 feet wide, and there
is no way to get to the rear from the front of the property, and
it seems like a reasonable option.
Mr. Betzoid stated that if the City does vacate the northern half
of this alley, they are essentially taking property from Mr.
Meisner. By denying him the access to the rear of his property
and then requiring him at�the sa�e time to have some place to park
his car, having to use his front yard for a driveway would diminish
the value of his property. If the only access to the rear of the
property is with an easement, that will cost someone some money,
and somehow this is going to have to be worked out. He stated
using the southern half of the alley is the worst scenario, because
it is probably just a matter of time before the neighbors to the
south are going to want to vacate their half of the alley. It is
too bad the City turned down the curb cut and driveway 12 _years
ago, because they wouldn't have this problem now.
Mr. Betzold stated he believed there is an issue here, because the
City is essentially taking property, and the City Attorney should
review this matter before it goes to Council. He would also like
staff to contact the apartment building owner and get more
information on that option.
Ms. Dacy stated staff will try to contact and meet with the
apartment building owner at 5851 - 2nd Street to see if it is
possible to get an access agreement, and they will also discuss
this with the City Attorney.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to table SAV #91-
O1, by Eugene and Jean Hagberg until the June 12, 1991, Planning
Commission meeting in order to obtain more information and to get
a legal opinion from the City Attorney.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, �LL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANZMOUSLY.
Ms. Dacy stated that if not enough information is available for
the June 12, 1991, meeting, the City will notify the neighbors
about a week prior to the meeting.
Ms. Sherek stated another question to be asked of the City Attorney
is that if there are legal fees incurred by the property owner to
record an access agreement, is there any precedent for the City
undertaking the payment of those fees?
2.
To vacate the east 110 x 40 fee of Dover Street as measured
from the east right-of-way ' e of Broad Avenue, subject to
an easement for utility p oses over the southerly 20 feet
of the portion of Dove StrePt to be vacated and a walkway
3X
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE UNDER 3ECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY
CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO
AMEND APPENDIX C OF TAE CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. To vacate the 12 foot alley in Block 23, Hyde Park,
for a distance of approximately 243 feet south of
the south line of 59th Avenue, generally located
north of 58th Avenue, south of 59th Avenue, east of
2nd Street, and west of 2 1/2 Street.
All lying in the North Half of Section 23, T-30, R-
24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota.
Be and is hereby vacated subject to the stipulation
adopted at the City Council meeting of
SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with
Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of
the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code
shall be so amended.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF _, 1991.
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: July 22, 1991
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
�
3Y
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
�
�r
MEMORANDUM
TO: WILLIAM � � ,
W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �,
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCB DIRECTOR
SHARON FETTING, STAF'F ACCOIINTANT
SIIBJECT: 1992 PRELIMINARY DRAFT BIIDGETS
DATL: Auqust 21, 1991
In conformance with Chapter 7, Section 7.04 of the City Charter,
attached is the 1992 Preliminary Draft Budget. The Budget should
be presented to Council at the August 26, 1991 meeting.
As can be seen by the attached Budget Overview, the Preliminary
Budget for all budgeted funds, reflects a 0.6� decrease over the
1991 Budget. The 1992 General Fund Budget is at a slightly less
than 1� decrease, whiie those funds included in the Budget
Resolution reflect a 4.5� decrease over 1991.
The 1992 Budget follows Council's direction to levy the property
tax levy at the same level as the 1991 levy.
The attached Budget Adjustments worksheet reflects the changes made
since the Budget worksessions in June. We would also like to call
your attention to a reclassification adjustment we have made in
conjunction with our Auditor's suggestion. The operating transfers
revenue in the General Fund, which is a reimbursement for personal
services, has been moved from the Other Financing Sources category
to the Charges for Services category. We have also moved the
expenditure in the Special Revenue and Enterprise Funds from
Operating Transfers Out to Personal Services. This is explained
further on page 102 of the Draft Budgets.
In conclusion, we present the 1992 Preliminary Draft Budgets.
RDP/ s f
Attachment
0
General Fund
................ ................................,,,. :....:.,
Special Revenue Funds
:.:.......: ...... . ........ ...........,.. ,
Capital Projects Funds
�.�
. . . . . . . . ,. . . . .,, . . ...: :-.,.: : : : : : : : : ., :.. : _ .. ......: . . . . . ,. . .,
Agency Fund
4}%3:i•:.•.}::•ik4.h:. .i.\.::V}i: �
.v............ ........... .:x.
Totai Budget Resolution
Enterprise Funds
.,:., <.:>:.::; <.;: :.:> �.;;;:.: ::;;:;.:,,-
� Total �Budaet
BUDGET OVERVIEW
1992 1990 9�0
Budget Actual Chan
8,871,403 8,069,380
..:.:... ,..,..::.,:.,,.._,::. :::.::...: :.:...:...:::::... . .�.-�:�:
461,664 325,805
.. .� n . . ... ... ... ... ,...,....�......
711,050 829,048 (
:., :.:: x::;. :.:.:.::::. :.::;;.::,:;.;::,::.:�::.:,;:.,r.;.::: .<.�n:.;;::::::...;.:..<
t... ��~3,500 3,637
.::.� =h:.: .:.>:.,: >:. >:.: : :.�:.:..4:.;. .. .... ::.. :.: : ;�.: : :.::.:;:.::.:
10,047,617 9,227,870
6,560,780 5,794,088
Y . . . , .. ... . . rr ...... ..... ....,.. ..... .....,........:.::,.
16,608,397 $15,021.958
1991
ge Budget
9.9 8,968,759
.,. ........ . . ., . . .
41.7 482,961
14.2) 1,046,500
:. r: .:: : .:.,:.>:.: :.:: �:.::..
�(3.8). . 3,500 .
.J8.9.. ...10,501,720,.. .
�
13.2 6,202,590
...... ...,.. . .. . . ........,. .... ,. .
10.6 $16,704,310
9�0
(1.1
�
(4.6
�
47.2
0
{7iii:ivy;+
(4.5
�
5.5
1992 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
GENERAL FUND
REVENUES
1. Revised Local Government Aid Estimate
2. Increase revenue for adjustments in Administrative Charges
3. Decrease Recreation Fees
3. Increase General Fund Reserve
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
1. Cost of Living 2.5% Increase
2. Cash Benefit Increase
3. Electronic Mail
4. Insurance Premium Adjustment
5. Film Recorder
6. Truth in Taxation Notices
7. MDT'S
8. Fax Machine
9. Police Vehicles
10. Hazardous Materials Training
11. Personal Services adjustment for Firefighters contract settlement
12. Bicycle Path Stripping
13. Street Maintenance Position
14. Movement of Recycling Coordinator to Solid Waste Fund
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
CABLE N FUND
1. Cost of Living 2.5% Increase '
2. Increase in payment to ACCW
3. Vectorscope
4. Increase in Operating Transfer to General Fund
5. Insurance Premium Adjustment
TOTAL CABLE N
GRANT MANAGEMENT FUND
Cost of Living 2.5% Increase 4B
($9,955)
4,546
(3,500)
230�937
$222,028
$132,819
3,104
7,721
(10,891)
(6,000)
600
(13,500)
(1,950)
(27,600)
12,000
1,610
1,000
(27,107)
(36,933)
$34,873
$464
1,750
1,400
454
535
$4.603
$Tl3
SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT FUND
1. Movement of Recycling Coordinator from Soiid Waste Fund
2. Insurance Premium Adjustment
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
1. Reduce Garage Roof replacement
2. Remove Meadowlands Picnic Shelter
3. Remove tennis court lighting for North Park
4. Reduce Little League Park Improvements
5. Reduce Overlay program
6. Remove East River Road Upgrade - Phase II
WATER FUND
1. Cost of Living 2.5% Increase
2. Insurance Premium Adjustment
3. Increase in administrative charges for services
4. Depreciation adjustment
5. Additional FICA contribution
6. Health Insurance Premium Adjustment
SEWER FUND
1. Reduction in Sewer disposal charge
2. Cost of Living 2.5% Increase
3. Insurance Premium Adjustment
4. Cash Benefit Increase
5. Increase in administrative charges for services
STORM WATER FUND
1. Increase in administrative charges for services
2. Insurance Premium Adjustment
4C
$36,933
41fi
$37,349
($47,250)
(12,000)
(5,000)
(57,750)
(188,000)
(100,000)
($410�000)
$5,133
(2,251)
2,925
{4,000)
1,100
(600)
$2,307
($20, 853)
4,058
(5,243)
240
2, 326
($19,472)
$1,140
(1,023)
$117
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
t
�r
MEMORANDUM
��f
. •"
TO. AILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGBR �
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SHARON FETTING� STAFF ACCOIINTANT
SIIBJECT: 1992 BIIDGET PIIBLIC HEARING DATE
DATE: Auqust 21, 1991
Minnesota Statute requires local governments to hold public
hearings on their budgets. The public hearing dates are required
to be set and certified to the County by September 1. We are
required to hold the hearings between November 15 and December 20.
We have attached a letter from the Anoka County Auditor informing
us of the Public Hearing dates the County and the School Districts
have set for their budgets. As noted on the letter, we were
informed by telephone on August 20 that School District #11 had to
change their date due to a conflict. Their new hearing date is
December 2.
We recommend Council set November 18 as the Public Hearing date on
the 1992 Budget and November 25 as the reconvening date if one is
needed.
RDP/ s f
Attachment
5
i
�
auc i s �99t
�� COU NTY OF ANOKA
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION
Edward M. Treska, Property Tax Administrator
COURTHOUSE • 325 EAST MAIN STREET • ANOKA, MN 55303
August 15, 1991 (612) 421-4760
The Honorable, William Nee
Mayor of Fridley
6431 Unive.rsity Ave NE
I'riclley, MN 5543`l
Dear Mayor Nee:
The Truth in Taxation law, M.S. 275.065 requires cities to
hold a public budget hearing for property taxes payable in
the year 1992. The dates for this hearing cannot conflict
with the dates set by the county or the school districts
located in your city. This hearing must be held between
November 15 and December 20. The following taxing districts
w.ithin your city have set the following hearing dates:
TAXING HEARING
DISTRICT DATE
Anoka County ..............December
School District #11.......December
School District #13.......December
School District #14.......November
School District #16.......December
RECONVENING
DATE
04.......December 11
03.......December 09
10.......December 17
19... ..November 26
10.......December 12
With this information you can now set the initial date for
yo:.�r ouhl;c hParina anc3 a date F�z- �'P�c?mmPnc;�_rin the mPet?_no:
if necessary. In addition, the time and location of the
initial meeting, the phone number an interested taxpayer may
call and your payable 1992 certified proposed property tax
l.evy is due on or before September 3, 1991.
If you have any questions concerning Truth in Taxation,
please contact Dick Sivanich at extension 1136.
Sincerely,
�LXI.W G, � �'� � c���1i��G�----._:.
Edward M. Treska
Director of Property Tax Administration
rS- -�C> �f l
�''� �S{���1 flc%-�id��� �l�h�Ku �G:�ni� ,
EMT : JRS : se . � � , . � ,�-fi-yc. t � i l C%1��C1icl �/�� '�
5��J0� �� r.� n u �(.Cf `�L> Cx-
�u,� .�, pec�� � c
�(��n.�/�c.-f �,c�;-rh /����'i.� �.zu�,
Affirmative Action / Ec�i pportunity Employer
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
t
�r
MEMORANDUM
�,
TO: WILLIAM W. BQRNB, CITY MANAGLR �`
�'
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SHARON FETTING, STAFF ACCOIINTANT
SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION CERTIFYING ��PROPOSED�� TA% LEV7i REQIIIREMENTS
FOR 1992 TO THE COIINTY OF ANORA FOR COLLECTION
DATS: Auqust 21, 1991
In conformance with Chapter 275, Section 065 of the Minnesota
Statutes, attached is a resolution certifying "proposed" tax levy
requirements to the Anoka County Auditor.
Chapter 275 requires the City to certify it's "proposed" tax levy
requirements prior to September 1.
The 1992 "proposed" tax levy of $4,751,465 represents a 0� increase
over the 1991 levy. You may note that the levy does not include
a Special Levy for the Unfunded Accrued Liability of the Police
Pension Fund. The 1991 Legislature rolled this levy into a City's
Levy Limit and therefore the City will no longer need to request
a special levy.
We request the City Council pass the attached resolution to certify
the "proposed" tax levy requirements.
RDP/sf
Attachment
�
RESOLUTION -1991
A RESOLIITION CERTIFYING "PROPOSED° TAX LEVY
REQUIREI�NTS FOR 1992 TO THE COUNTY OF ANORA
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Chapter 275, Section 065 requires the
City to certify it's "proposed" tax levy requirements to the
County Auditor;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley certify
to the County Auditor of the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota,
the following "proposed" tax levy to be levied in 1991 for the
year 1992.
GENERAL FUND
General Fund
CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
Capital Improvement Fund - Parks Division
AGENCY FUND
Six Cities Watershed Management Organization
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
$4,660,276
$ 87,689
S 3,500
$4,751,465
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
THIS DAY OF , 1991.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
. '
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
t
r��r
MEMORANDUM
TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �
M�
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCE DIRECTOR
SHARON FETTING, STAFF ACCOIINTANT
SIIBJECT: RESOLIITION ADOPTING A��PROPOSED�� BIIDGET FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1992
DATL: Auqust 21, 1991
In conformance with Chapter 275, Section 065 of the Minnesota
Statutes, attached is the "proposed" 1992 Preliminary Draft Budget.
Chapter 275 requires the City to certify a"proposed" budget to
the County Auditor prior to September l.
We request the City Council pass the attached resolution and adopt
the 1992 "Proposed" Budget.
RDP/sf
Attachment
7
RE�OI�Ul'I�1 - 1991
��:�_• � • • �• • � •,� •�:i:�� :�U�r.' �• � �:i' _ �,.
� :r+•
Wf�k2EA.S, Chapter 7, Sectic� 7.04 of the City CY�arter pravides that the City
Manager shall prepare an annual b�et: and
W�',RF,AS, Chapter 275, Sectian 065 of Mintzesota Statutes requires 'that the City
shall ado�pt a"pro��osed" b�dget before Sept�nber 1; and
W'�2EAS, Ci�apt�er 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Stabut�es requires that such
"pral�osed" bvdget be oexfified to the Oo�unty Auditor;
NOW Zi�REF�RE, BE IT RESOLUID, that the follawing ��proposedo budget be advpted
and appraved:
GENERAL FUND
Taxes and Special Assessments:
Current Ad Valorem
Delinquent, Penalties,
Forfeited
Special Assessments
Licenses and Permits:
Licenses
Permits
intergovernmentai:
Federal
State -
Homestead and Agriculture
Credit Aid
Local Government Aid
All Other
Charges for Services
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Storm Water Fund
Liquor Fund
Cabie TY Fund
Fines and Forfeits
Interest on Investments
Miscellaneous Revenues
Other Financing Sources:
IRDB Deposits Fund
Construction Funds
Empioyee Benefit Fund
Closed Debt Service Fund
TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER
FINANCING SOURCES
Fund Balance:
Designated for repl of fixed assets
General Fund Reserve
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
ESTIMATED
REVENUE
$3,546,183
78,045
f.312
123,833
2Q5.875
5,620
1,000,428
1,478,960
404,958
215,967
163,572
117,439
85,225
27,174
61,345
18,619
260,000
275,000
77,623
10,393
25,850
100,000
t 00,545
8.383,966
108.221
379,216
58.871,403
7A
l.egislative:
Clty Council
Planning Commissions
Other Commissions
C+ty Managemeni:
General Management
Personnel
Legal
Finance:
Elections
Accounting
Assessing
MIS
City Clerk/Records
Police:
Police
Civil Defense
Fire:
Public Works:
Civic Center
Technical Engineering
Traffic Engineering
Street Lighting
Public Works Maintenance
Recreation:
Naturalist
Recreation
Community Development:
Building Inspection
Planning
Reserve:
Emergency
Nondepartmental:
APPROPRIATIONS
$107,317
3,829
5,586
290,381
80,214
168,000
46,480
487,520
157,395
148,046
90.805
2,696,027
8.702
667,719
176,532
452,640
60,405
144,400
'1,684,140
234,114
514,448
198,743
233,4p6
180,895
33,659
$8.871,403
SPECIAL REVENUE FllNDS
Cable TV Fund $108,334
Grant Management Fund 198,463
Solid Waste Abatement Fund 172,246
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS a479,043
CAPITAL PROJECTS fUNDS
Capital Improvement Fund
Taxes - Current Ad Valorem
Interest on Investments
Donations
State Aid Construction
TOTAL CAPfTAL PROJECTS FUNDS
AGENCY FUND
Six Cities Watershed Fund
Taxes - Current Ad Valorem
TOTAL AGENCY FUN�
TOTAL
$85,550
506,779
20,000
274,000
�886.329
$3.500
53.500
a,o,2ao.2�
General Capital Improvement
Streets Capital Improvement
Parks Capital Improvement
•. �� � � • �• - a�� : r i w •• w� • r i .� • • N� r �
1 �' /. . • . M M �I'
.
WTT T TAM aT. DiEE — MAYOR
$90,955
198,463
172,246
5461,664
�114,200
245.000
351,850
5711,050
$3,500
a3,500
aio,oa�,s,�
�j��i •
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
�
�
MEMORANDUM
TOS WILLIAM W. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGLR ��
�'
FROM:
SIIBJECT:
DATE:
RICBARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
RESOLIITION MODIFYING THE COMMLRCIAL DBVELOPMENT
REVENQE BOND FOR FRIDLEY BIISINE88 PLASA PARTNSRSHIP
AIIGIIST 21, 1991
Attached you will find the resolution that has been provided to us
by Steve Rindsig from the law firm of Leonard, Street and Deinard.
They are acting as Bond Counsel for the developer. All the
information provided by Mr. Rindsig has been reviewed by James
O'Meara from the firm of Briggs and Morgan who is acting as Counsel
for the City in this particular action. I've attached his
communication to provide you with the comments he had at the
conclusion of his review process.
By passing the
the Industrial
in 1986.
RDP/me
Attachment
resolution it will allow the developer to remarket
Revenue Development Bonds that were originally sold
:
FR!i1q EF,i�3r,� M��R6�;N _.F !THII)��.22.'?1 15:3; t�0.4G PpGc 4
�P'Ji]fT7F$�$ ]?I$ECT DInL 23G�ISE78
LAiv OFFICES
�;3�,YGC�S �Nr� b�OI�GAI\
PROF'ESSIONdI. A.SSCX=�A7C1(?ti
z�S00 FIRST' D7ATIOlv'AL H,.�a.,\;8 HIIILDI.Tl3
S �INT pAIIL� MISvTIESOTA bS101
TL�LEPII02dE (O1C) �L'3•6600
FACSIMZLE 4612) EE3-6�1b0
H E M O R A N D II M
MI\'IC�iPpII$ OP'FICE
��I00 I D 3 CE.\TER
�iL\'\L'lPOLis� ML\�iESOie 63aoC
TEZEPHpITE f012e �34 �pypp
F�hCSI7dIL$ (63C+1 .'�d-e6Cp
T�: Fridley City Cauncil � �
FRC3M: Jim O' Meaxa �� a',�-
. �
DATE: August 22, 1991
RE: Propos�d Amendments ta the Ci�yf� Commercial D�velopment
Revenue Bonds (Fridley Buriness plaza Limited Partnership
Projeat)
---------------�-.��...--------------------,._--_---------
�he City issued th�se "3�ndustrial development revenue bondsn
in september af 1986 ta provid� �ax-�xempt financing to Fridley
�usiness Piaza Limited partnership far constructian af an
approximately 55,OQ0 square fdot multi-tenant in3ustrial/cammercial
build�ng iacated generally in the south�as� quadrant of the
iriterse�tian of 73rd Avenue and Un�.versity Avenue. These Sonds
were and are not a debt af the City.
To help secure the bonds, a letter af credit was abtained fram
the Natianal Bank af Canada.
It has been represented to me that the Praject has not rented
up as weil as hoped (currentYy at about 80� l�ase�d) , Ghat it has
experi�nced sam� c2,s�h flaw prob2em�, anci that the Campany has gone
irita default an some of i�s obiigations under the Sond documen�s,
�ncluding the naripaym�n� a� 3.ts property taxe� and special
assessments in �990 and in the first half of 1991, and th�
nanpay�aen� ot it5 debt se�vice abligations in �une and Jul�r of this
year.
Th� B�rik is standi,ng behind the Bonds wi�h its �etter of
credit and it wauld have a number of options to d�al with these
def2tults (there were several oth�rs of a more teohniaal nature).
It apparently has elect�d to �xercise i.ts right to �"purcha�e" the
�ands, wriich meana that the exi�sting band holders will be paid in
fUil. in addi.ti.on, in wha� w�uld ap�►ear to be a"workout�� attempt
aver the next three years, in the hopes that the Pro�ect will
achieve self-�ufficiency, the Bank would renew i�s Letter of Credit
for three years (again securinq the payment of the debt service on
. �
FCcl�9 6F'IGG: MOF,GqN •1F (THU7C��t.22.�41 15:3e• tJQ.4G FA�E 5
BRIGGS A*_vD �'1QFtGAN
the �andsj, th� Bank would make a loan to the Gompar►y of
approximately $3p0,000 (most o�' which will be used �a pay the
delinquent taxes and the cost� of the transaction currently
proposedj, and through Miiier & Schroeder Municipsls, Inc. to
"remarket" the Bonds (preaumably, but not necessarily to the
publiaj. The interest rate on these "Y'►ew" Bonds would be reset to
the rate necessa�ry to market them �t par at the present time, bui
this was �t feature of the original documents. In addition, there
would be a deferral for three years of principal payme»t� which the
original dacuments otherw�se required, although the average
maturity of the �onds as a wholg is not being extended.
We are not acting as bond counsel far this transaction but as
special counsel ta the city. S�cause the matu�rities are being
Ch�nged, there is a general belief on a technfcal level that this
amounts to a"reissyance" for fedex�al tax purposes. The City is
being asked to apprave an amendinent to the originai and restateci
Indenture af Trust and a short amendmerit to the origin2�l Loan
Agre�ment. These wauld technica�ly be required if this proposed
transactian is to proceed.
My ra].e is not ta reGOmmend to the Council whetber this
propasal is warthy o� approval but rather to protect the interests
o� the City should the Council decid� to proaeed. In no event,
would the Bonds be payable by the City.
I wauld point out that the original project invol.ved a$30,oQo
tax increment cor�tribution far aafl corxection and the project
currently is within a Fridley HRA tax irlcrement district, �d the
non--payment of the progerty taxes, which was a benefit of the
original bargain iri the first place, has n�ga�ively impactecl the
�iRA�s tax increment expe�tations.
Tixe resoluti�on which the Courtcil has been asked to consider o»
Manday, August 26, has been subetantia7,ly revised in response ta my
comments. zt d4es approve the City's execut�.on and delivery of the
two ame»dments mentioned abave, but it stipulates that they may not
be delive�ed unless and unt�l all the delinqu�nt taxes �nd special
assessments have been paid and unless such ather cond�tions as we
may think apprapriate by letter to bond counsel or barik counsel
have been satisfied. These conditions wili include indemr►ificat�ian
af the City from the Gampany, the Ha1�k, and Miller & Schroeder
ag�inst any and all liability axieirig from the €ailure to abide by
any app�icable state or f�d�ral securities laws. we are also
�e�quir�ng COU�sel ta �eMder an opinian �o the City that all such
applicable requiremen�� have in ��G� ��n met, Sinae nat all af
the praposed dacuments (excep� those involving the city) have yet
beert dr2tfted, I can't say whether additional r�quir�ments might be
impased.
� da b�lieve, hawever, that should the Cauncil decide to
apprave this request, the Content af the document� involving the
City wi.11 be &atisfactory.
.
�. :
City Council
of the
City of Fridley, Minnesota
Resolution No.
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Fridley,
Anoka County, Minnesota, Approving a Second Supplemental
Indenture of Trust and a First Amendment to Loan
Agreement Respecting the City's Commercial Development
Revenue Bonds (Fridley Business Plaza Limited Partnership
Project)
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Minnesota Municipal Industrial
Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, the City of
Fridley, Minnesota (the "City") issued its revenue obligation(s)
for the purposes specified therein and for the financing of
eligible projects thereunder;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 102-1986, adopted by the
Fridley City Council on September 22, 1986 (the "Bond Resolution"),
and pursuant to an indenture of Trust, dated as of September 1,
1986 and Resolution No. 124-1986 which authorized a Supplemented
and Restated Indenture of Trust, (collectively, the "Indenture"),
between the City and Norwest Bank Minneapolis, National
Association, in Minneapolis Minnesota (the "Initial Trustee"), the
City issued its $2,800,000 (original principal amount) Commercial
Development Revenue Bonds (Fridley Business Plaza Limited
Partnership Project), bearing September 23, 1986, as the date of
issue thereof (the "Bonds");
WHEREAS, Fridley Business Plaza Limited Partnership, a
Minnesota limited partnership (the "Company"), constructed an
approximately 58,000 square foot multi-tenant industrial/commercial
facility (the "Project") in the City with proceeds of the Bonds
upon the terms and conditions specified in the Act and the
Agreement (as hereinafter defined);
WHEREAS, the City and the Company entered into a Loan
Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1986 (the "Agreement"), which
provided, among other things, for the loan of the proceeds of the
Bonds to the Company to be used to finance the Project;
WHEREAS, the Indenture, the Bond Resolution and the Agreement
contemplate the subsequent execution of Security Documents and/or
:
Credit Provider pocuments
Indenture), as well as such
Indenture and the Agreement
connection therewith;
(as defined in the Agreement and
amendments of or successors to the
as may be desirable or necessary in
WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City two supplemental
documents entitled Second Supplemental Indenture of Trust, dated
as of September l, 1991, proposed to be entered into between the
City and First Trust National Association, as successor to the
Initial Trustee providing certain amendments to the Indenture and
entitled First Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of September
1, 1991, proposed to be entered into between the City and the
Company providing certain amendments to the Agreement (such
documents being hereinafter collectively referred to as the
"Supplemental Documents"); and
WHEREAS, copies of the proposed Supplemental Documents have
been placed on file in the office of the City Clerk:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Fridley, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby finds that the approval,
execution and delivery by the City of the Supplemental Documents
would serve the interests of the City; provided, however that
notwithstanding anything contained in this resolution to the
contrary, the authorization herein for the execution and delivery
of the Supplemental Documents is contingent on (a) the payment of
all delinquent property taxes and delinquent special assessments
levied against the Project, including any and all interest and
penalties related thereto, (b) the effective cure (or waiver in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the documents related
to the Bonds) of all other defaults of the Company specified in the
Company General Certificate to be dated as of September 1, 1991,
and (c) satisfaction of such other conditions as Briggs and Morgan,
as special counsel to the City, shall specify in writing to legal
counsel to the Credit Provider and/or the Remarketing Agent (as
such terms are defined in the Indenture).
Section 2. The Bonds are and shall remain special and limited
obligations of the City, payable solely from the revenues derived
by the City from the Agreement and from the Trust Estate provided
in the Indenture. Otherwise, the Bonds shall not constitute a debt
of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory
or Home Rule Charter provision, shall not constitute or give rise
to any pecuniary liability of the City, any charge against the
City�s full faith and credit or taxing powers or any charge, lien
or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any funds or other assets
of the City.
Section 3. The City Council of the City hereby authorizes the
Mayor and the officers of the City to execute and deliver the
2
: �
Supplemental Documents. All of the provisions of the Supplemental
Documents, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shail
be deemed to be a part of this resolution as fully and to the same
extent as if incorporated verbatim herein and shall be in full
force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof.
The Supplemental Documents shall be substantially in the form on
file in the office of the City Clerk with such necessary and
appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as the Mayor and
officers of the City executing the same shall approve, as evidenced
by such execution thereof.
Section 4. Except as otherwise provided in this resolution,
all rights, powers and privileges conferred and duties and
liabilities imposed upon the City or the City Council by the
provisions of this resolution and the Supplemental Documents shall
be exercised or performed by the City or by such members of the
City Council or by such officers, board, body or agency thereof as
may be required by law to exercise such powers and to perform such
duties.
No covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement herein
contained or contained in the Supplemental Documents shall be
deemed to be a covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement of
any member of the City Council or any officer, agent or employee
of the City in that person's individual capacity.
Section 5. In case any one or more of the provisions of this
resolution or the Supplemental Documents shall for any reason be
held to be illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall
not affect any other such provision, but this resolution and the
Supplemental Documents shall be construed as if such illegal or
invalid provision had not been contained therein.
Section 6. The officers of the City, attorneys, engineers and
other agents or employees of the City are hereby authorized to do
all acts and things required of them by or in connection with
resolution and the Supplemental Documents for the full, punctual
and complete performance of all the terms, covenants and agreements
contained therein, including without limitation the execution and
delivery of all supplementary certificates and documents necessary
or advisable in connection with the execution of the Supplemental
Documents.
Section 7. Except for modifications contemplated by the
Supplemental Documents, this resolution does not supersede, nullify
or modify the Bond Resolution, which has remained in full force and
effect since its adoption and which is hereby reaffirmed, but this
resolution shall be construed as supplementary thereto in respect
of the express authorization herein for the execution and delivery
by the City of the Supplemental Documents.
3
:
Section 8. The City Council hereby consents to the
distribution of the Remarketing Statement prepared for the Bonds
in connection with the remarketing of the Bonds; provided however,
the City has not reviewed or participated in the preparation of the
Remarketing Statement and assumes no responsibility for the
accuracy or completeness thereof, or otherwise.
Adopted by the Fridley City Council on August 26, 1991.
�
:
_
�
GTYOE
FRIDLEY
MEMORANDUM
Municipai Center
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridiey, MN 55432 �
(612) 571-3450
Office of the City Manager
William W. Burns
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: William W. Burns, City Manager �,.��
DATE: August 22, 1991
SUBJECT: Senior Citizens Center Task Force
The following individuals have agreed to serve on the Fridley
Senior Citizens Center Task Force:
Councilmember-at-Large Nancy J. Jorgenson
Councilmember Edward J. Fitzpatrick
Marguerite Gilbert
Rose Totino
Corinne Prindle
Richard Storla
John Gargaro
We request that the City Council approve the appointment of the
above individuals to the Fridley Senior Citizens Center Task Force.
Thank you.
/rsc
0
I _
�
Community Development Department
G DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: August 22, 1991
.� �.
TO: William Burns, City Manager �.
FROM:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SU&7ECT: First Reading of an Ordinance Approving a
Vacation Request, SAV #91-03, by William
Pickering, Located at 1467 North Innsbruck
Drive N.E.
Attached please find the ordinance vacating the south 15 feet of
a platted drainage and utility easement located on Lot 11, Block
2, Innsbruck North, the same being 1467 North Innsbruck Drive N.E.
The City Council held a public hearing regarding the vacation at
its August 12, 1991 meeting. Staff recommends that the City
Council approve the first reading of the attached ordinance.
MM/dn
M-91-617
�0
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE IINDER SECTION 12.07 OF THE CITY
CHARTER TO VACATE STREETS AND ALLEYS AND TO
AMEND APPENDIX C OF THE CITY CODE
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION l. To vacate the Southwesterly 15 feet of the
Northeasterly 40 feet of the platted drainage and
utility easement of Lot 11, Block 2, Innsbruck
North, generally located at 1467 North Innsbruck
Drive N.E.
All lying in the South Half of Section 24, T-30, R-
24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, Minnesota.
Be and is hereby vacated.
SECTION 2. The said vacation has been made in conformance with
Minnesota Statutes and pursuant to Section 12.07 of
the City Charter and Appendix C of the City Code
shall be so amended.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1991.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: August 12, 1991
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
10A
� _
�
Community Development Department
P G Drvisiorr
City of Fridley
DATE: August 22, 1991 � /�
`�.
TO: William Burns, City Manager �• '
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Comprehensive Sign Plan for 250 Osborne Road
N.E.
Attached please find the proposed sign criteria for Osborne
Crossings, located at 250 Osborne Road N.E. The sign plan provides
each tenant an individual cabinet sign which will not exceed 5' x
20' or the maximum area set forth by the wall sign formula in the
sign code The cabinets will be located on the front wall of the
building. Each tenant will be allowed to choose their color and
style of lettering which will be placed on a white background.
The landlords are also proposing that in addition to the wall signs
centered between each tenant's lease lines, each tenant will be
allowed one 37 square foot wall sign placed on the southeast wall
of the building. If wall signs are placed on more than one wall
of the building, staff recommends that only the tenant whose space
abuts the sautheast wall should be allowed to have wall signage
placed on this wall. We believe that four 37 square foot signs may
promote a cluttered appearance rather than just one sign. While
there is no specific requirement in the sign code preventing the
proposed request, comprehensive sign plans approved in the past
have limited signage to the front of shopping centers. The tenants
which are at the corners of the centers may have signage on the
side wall (Joe DiMaggio's, Snyders).
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached sign
criteria for 250 Osborne Road N.E., with one amendment:
l. Wall signage on the southeast wall shall be limited to the
tenant whose space abuts the wall, and the sign shall not
exceed 100 square feet (referenced II F of�sign criteria).
MM/dn
M-91-605
11
August 15, 1991
Michele McPherson
City of Fridley
6431 University
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Michele:
WEIS ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.
3661 Minnesoto Drive
Minneqpolis, Mirmesota 55435
Telephone: 612-831-9060
Eax: 612-831-3132
Enclosed is the sign criteria we would like to have adopted for
our Osborne Crossings located at 250 Osborne Road in Fridley.
I. GENERAL
A) Only the area
identified by a
a sign and the
of the Tenant.
above the Tenant's premises shall be
sign. the furnishing and installation of
costs incurred shall be the responsibility
B) It is intended that the signing of the retail stores on the
center shall be developed in an imaginative and varied
manner, and although previous and current signing practices
of the tenant will be considered they will not govern signs
to be installed on the retail stores.
C) Each Tenant will be required to identify its premises by a
sign.
II. SIGN CRITERIA
A} The wording of the signs shall be limited to the store name
only, and such name shall not include any items sold
therein.
B) Multiple or repetive signing will be allowed only with the
approval of the Landlord provided the area of such signing
conforms to the iimitations set forth herein.
C)
D)
All signs and identifying marks shall be within the
limitation s of the sign fascia as set forth hereinafter.
The height of sign cabinets will be 5`0" and not exceed
20'0" long.
E) No sign may exceed 100 sq. feet or the maximum set forth by
the City of Fridley Sign Code on any given wall. (Wall
defined as that area between the tenant lease lines)
1 1�MMERCIAL PROPERTY LEASING AND MANAGEMENT
F) In addition to the sign identifying the tenant premises,
each tenant will be permitted to have an additional sign of
37 square feet on the east wall of the building.
G) The sign cabinets to be constructed from aluminum and non-
corrosive materials with plastic faces.
H) The following design standards will be adhered to:
1) To be fabricated from aluminum translucent white acrylic
face.
2) All signs must be U.L. labeled and meet with City of
Fridley sign criteria.
III. PROHIBI�'ED TYPES OF SIGNS OR SIGN COMPONENTS
A) Moving of rotating signs.
B) Back-illuminated signs.
C) Signs employing moving or flashing lights.
D) Signs employing painted and/or non-illuminated letters.
E) Cloth, wood paper of cardboard signs, stickers, decals, or
painted signs around or on exterior surfaces (including
interior and exterior surfaces of doors and/or windows) of
the premises.
F) 5igns employing noise making devices and components.
G) Sings, letters, symbols or identification of any nature
painted directly on surfaces exterior of the premises.
H) Roof-top exterior sings.
I) Semi trailers with sign boards in the parking lot
IV. PROCEDURE FOR SIGN DRAWINGS
A) Tenant shall submit three (3) sets of blueline prints of the
drawings and specifications, including samples of materials
and colors, for all its proposed sign work. the drawings
shall clearly show location of sign on storefront elevation
drawing, graphics, color and construction and attachment
details. Full information regarding electrical load
requirements and brightness in footlambers is to also be
included.
��B
B) As soon as possible after receipt of the sign drawings,
�Landlord shall return to Tenant (1) set of such sign
drawings with its suggested modification and/or approval.
C) Approved drawing copy must be presented to the City of
Fridley along with application for permit to install sign.
Sincerely,
Weis Asset Mana ement Inc �
r
Robert E. Grootwassink
REG/vs
cc: Mike Hurley
Enclosure
11C
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
'Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Mana er �� PW91-257
g d`.
FROM: John G. Flora,�Public Works Director
DATE: August 20, 1991
SUBJECT: Awarding Contract for Skywood Lane Water
Extension Project No. 220
The City has received the MnDOT approval to install the 12-inch
waterline in the I-694 right-of-way. We have not yet received an
easement from Menards to install the 12-inch watermain behind their
building.
Bids were opened on August 7, 1991, and received by the Council on
August 12, 1991. We are currently awaiting the utility easement
from Menards and their signature to a letter of understanding
regarding the improvement project. If these issues are resolved
by August 26, 1991, we recommend the City Council award the
contracts to Northdale Construction, the low bidder, for the
Skywood Lane Water Extension Project No. 22_0 portions A and B for
$108,632.00.
If the Menards issues have not been resolved by the City Council
meeting of August 26, 1991, I recommend this item be tabled so that
we may continue working with the Menards organization.
JGF/ts
Attachments
/
�
CIiYOf
FWDLF.Y
12
BID PROPOSALS FOR
SRYWOOD LANE WATER E%TENSION PROJECT NO. 220
WEDNESDAY, AUGIIST 7, 1991 11500 A.M.
BID TOTAL
PLANHOLDER BOND BID COMMENTB
Northdale Construction
14450 Northdale Blvd
Rogers MN 55374
Bonine Excavating
12669 Meadowvale Road
Elk River MN 55330
Meyer Contracting Inc
19145 Vassar Street
Forest Lake MN 55025
Brown & Cris Inc
East Frontage Road of I-35
19740 Kenrick Ave
Lakeville MN 55044
Volk Sewer & Water
8909 Bass Creek Court
Brooklyn Park MN 55428
Glendale Contracting Inc
3030 Harbor Lane
Plymouth MN 55447
Penn Contracting Inc
1697 Peltier Lake Drive
Centerville MN 55038
5� �$108,632.00
5% �$123,466.91
5� �$124,645.80
5% �$125,309.05
5$ �$130,582.02
5� �$141,929.50
5% �$145,348.65
American Ductile Iron Pipe
12112 Lynn Ave S
PO Box 278 NO BID
Savage MN 55378-0278
CCS Contracting
1399 lOth St NW #304
New Brighton MN 55112
Hydro-Con
PO Box 129
North Branch NIN 55056
Midwest Asphalt
PO Box 5477
Hopkins MN 55343
Water Products
15801 West 78th St
Eden Prairie MN 55344
NO BID
NO BID
NO BID
NO BID
12A
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
�'� �
TO: Wi.11iam W. Burns, City Manager PW91-252
FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Direct:or �
DATE: �t 22 � 1991
SUBJECT: �nqe prder No. 2 for St-xeet It�rwemnerit
Plroject No. ST. 1991 - 1& 2
With the proposal to coi�stYV�ct th� Little Lea9ue Par'kinc! facility aryd exte.nd 3rd
Street plus widen the parkuzg lot for the Fridley Liquor Store, w�e have developed
neoessary plans ar�d specificatiar�s for these project.s.
Change O�rler No. 2 to Street I�rave�ment Project No. ST. 1991 - 1& 2 is beir�g
sub�nitted to incozporate the tw� additions to aur 1991 street t�anstructian
program. The Little League parking facility is estimated at $46,452.00 ar�d the
3rd Street exter�sion with parkirig lot is estimated at $52, 679. 00 iu�rovement
c�sts. ��u�d adjustment for these impravements will be subaaitted when fix�a.l costs
are obtained.
Reconnnerxi the City Cx�uzcil apprave Change O�ler No. 2 to ST. 1991 - 1& 2 for
$77,906.50 constxuctian so that the project can be ooa��leted this year.
JGF/ts
Attachments
13
�
CliYOF
FitIDI.EI�
�
,
CITY OF FRIDIEY
IIIGIlVE�2.�TG DEPA�IT
6431 IINIVIIZSITY AVE., N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
Augu.st 26, 1991
W.B. Miller, Inc.
16765 Nutria Street
Ratnsey, MN 55303
SUB�TECr: C�lange Order No. 2: Street Improvem�nt Project
No. ST. 1991 - 1& 2
Gentl.enten:
You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instxucted to modify yaur aontract for the Street
Impravement Project No. ST. 1991 - 1& 2 b�y addirig the follawitx� work:
ADDITION•
APPRfJX.
ITII�I OUAAI'I':T.'I'Y
PART A- I�fiI'L� LEAGUE PARKII�TG I� •
1. Remave pavement 700 Sq. Yd.
2. Common excavation 1,500 �. Yd.
3. Remove posts 1 Ixm� Stiun
4. Remove fence 1 Ixamp S�m►
5. Remove gate 1 I�unp Stnn
6. Transplant trees 2 Each
7. Construct C.B., type nCn
or "G" 1 Each
8. 8" PVC storm line 155 Lin. Ft.
9. Concrete curb & gutter,
B6-18 1,720 Lin. F't.
10. Aggregate base,
class 5 850 �ons
11. BitLmLinous paving,
type 2341 420 Tons
12. Adjust ring & frame 3 Each
13A
�'� M�
$ 1.25
2.60
50.00
100.00
25.00
60.00
:�� ��
� ••
5.65
6.75
24.60
120.00
.��
$ 875.00
3,900.00
50.00
100.00
25.00
120.00
800.00
3,100.00
9,718.00
5,737.50
10,332.00
360.00
W.B. Miller, Inc.
Page �tao
Change Order No. 2
August 26, 1991
APPROX.
1TI'II�I QiTAN'I'I'I'Y
PART A- I1fiI7�E LEAG�JE PARKIIdG L�7I' (Cor►t'd) •
13. Sod 600 Sq. Yd.
14. Seeding w/mulch &
fertilizer 0.5 Acres
15. Parking lot stripirig
�- «
1.50
1,500.00
(paint) 1,240 Lin. F`t. 0.20
16. Handicap symUols 3 Each 50.00
17. Mave sign 1 I� Stinn 100.00
18. Mave bleacher 1 I� S�.utt 100.00
TO'1'�L PAI2T A- LITI'I� LEAGUE
PARI�G IOT:
PART B- LIOUOR S'It�RE PARi�TG IO�I' & 3RD STRF�,T EX'I'II�tSION:
l. Remave pavement 1,000 Sq. Yd. 1.25
2. Remove light pole 1 Each 300.00
3. Clear & grtal� roadway 1 I�tmtp Stnn 300.00
4. C�oarnnon excavation 1, 000 Cu. Yd. 2. 60
5. Remave c«rb 40 Lin. Ft. 2.40
6. Concrete pan (30" wide) 48 Lin. Ft. 10.00
7. Concrete curb & gutter
design B6-18 900 Lin. Ft. 5.65
8. Aggregate ba_se,
Class 5 1,200 Zbns 6.75
9. Asphalt PavirxJ, tYPe
2331 350 Tons 24.00
10. Asphalt paving, type
2341 300 Zbns 24.60
11. Tack coat 1,150 Gallons 1.00
13B
. �
•�� ��
750.00
248.00
150.00
100.00
100.00
� 37,365.50
1,250.00
300.00
300.00
2,600.00
96.00
480.00
5,085.00
8,100.00
8,400.00
7,380.00
1,150.00
w.s. riiller, Inc.
Page Three
Change Order No. 2
August 26, 1991
APPRnX.
I'I�I 4UrANTIR.'Y PRICE
PART B- LIOUOR S'I�ORE PARi�TG IAT & 3RD STREh,T EX'PIIISION (�nt'd) :
12. Striping 2,900 Lin. Ft. 0.20
13. Blac�c dirt, ing�ort 200 Cu. Yd. 4.00
14. Sod 900 Sq. Yd. 1.50
15. Allegheny sexvice
b�rry (1 3/4" B& B) 9 Each 220.00
16. � Seagreen Juniper 23 Each 30.00
��
580.00
800.00
1,350.00
1,980.00
690.00
TOT�L P�il�l' B- LIQOOR S'InRE PAi2I�G IAT &
3RD S'TRE�,'I' F.xI'IIZSIQQd: $ 40 , 541. 00
Rm'r,L FART A-?�7TL� I�TE PAi2i�G LOT: $ 37,365.50
TOTAL PAI�P B- LIQUOR STORE PARKIIaG IOT
& 3RD STRFET EX'1'II3SIaQd: $ 40,541.00
GR�ID 'I�O'I'�L Q�NGE ORDER 1�. 2: � 77,906.50
TOTAL C�NGE ORDERS•
Original Contract amoLUZt $ 366,230.00
Contract Addition - Change On�ier No. 1 6,904.00
Contract Addition - Ciiange O�ler No. 2 77, 906. 50
REVISEID OOI�fl�2�C.'T AIrYJiJI� $451, 040. 50
?lora, Public Works Director, on the 26th day of August,
� /�
�i
G. Flora, P.E.
:tor of Public Works
13C
n
W•D. 1'lll��r� 1111...
Page Four
Change Order No. 2
August 26, 1991
Ap�roved and aooepted this Z Z 4� day of � v S T , 1991. b'Y
WTTTTAM B. MIIZII2� INC.
� t
, � �
Wi.11iam B. Mi.11er, President
Appraved and aa�epted this 26th day of August , 1991, by
a • • �.
William J. Nee, Mayor
William W. Burns, City Manager
13D
� � . ..- H ` . .: , ., t� .. � , ._ _ _. . ,: . . . . . . . . .
( J� + � .I � { r . G. .'
,� " `r .� , x j f� .t _ �' r �"i � 3�
t1 S S��y.; �..� t� � . 5 ��.j 4 J , �1 1��� _..._`_ ` ' .H. ..
q� � ��X ; . � ,�.r.' . r � . �`'i' . . . ' . .
� .y. �� r� F r�n.�.� � ', . � ..
� vs�� . � (S..yS: : . � . s ,,�
ti� � `�f,��rr�ity.W' , t ��:� �•e � •; . 'T - � �''yM i��•S �� �.. �'e-�k . � •
f� ' ;r�,� ..;� r �.'i }.. �? ` i. `- : -... �f:' . .. .
i , � ' � � ��y � � '�'+7�+ � �'. •� , +K
, r � -� � t . ' ' . rt'�pl�' 1�. �.i a y. . ,.�: - .:,
: . '� � t. , s �
'' � o�ry �",fl.�,4 � . . . : . � . • ���nn,..«e"�'�*Gt �{ ��.>ix . � '.;.
G+y�r"'�'e��S 'c�+y��ar :+'Y�+,�'�...�^Y�. w t,e° � ii.: : • , . t .�J - � � c:. ... •• !�}`yr�'
� ' .f x.•�.�� r � }� y< 1'p A«.M �'�' '• �+r'"`'"'�^�.tl� � �.'t.� .a ; ^�is : i ��n: i� .��-, ..
�tij n.}T�� fi, t :c 1.� r. �" _*K .. �:!", i ��w„'r. ��d .....
�,� k� �'.+.'h ,eyfr�f` -V-`� S 4- :M1j i `C�l}y.: M `.
.:i/,+„a ���ti;'i�:�-t'"' y;p �� � li � "Y �. 1'•.' '�y^S^�:
c'. J��,% Y a!�7� m'"'�' ..t.. . -r� "� � � - .. Y+.i � jt . . 4 r� .
? 3�.� yY
�y.y''t' 4 �h=N�i. � r . ^ , x.� • T3
� y �'::t ".,,�',"���;+.� -!��.t3.�p�.�_ . .;� ' . . ' � .�;: ,''�r�+l� .
r t �, K'� a f � . :5. - .� ' x, x;.. . . �
.,. �,�'��L��. � ��.+r.,�,s(' � y�4• �k ,,. +� , y •.� lr+„�
� i . � r > . '�!�.� il' t "�. � ; '• \ a :...:
�„�. ` 4 '�.�t�u�' � �.T��aiT+ ` ' _'_'� {( � a�- xk
�j �L,�F?j. .� � �� : ,�:���, ih �E�• �`.s . ' � '•- `� *4�%r. �'S . �i
�h c, =L X.. . YY �'40`''S` �r,� � k i k �.M1 es ra `.yf ',Y� •
• ♦ .� tf � • t c
�r`r � ^t�''� 3,1�' ,� ,�.,,`i `� ~ � � M� � � r �� `,� '�'i',..
:� • Y^N�a 't �� i y `v <L rr s i jt: . w� rK. �. t+ : 1 5!'.. ' r �s� �r:
> t � 7 � •e.. y �•� 3 u,� .l� '.r ..�t�'
. �y,� S +' i-.: `'� s ��- 4 � ,�. � n s� :�' � � � .. ,r s � � �£;:
f ' ,�Y � ��,.�+�R'�9?i t 4�'+t � � £�' i • Q� . � 'i :'
�. 3.M'ti"'-.r "' �r��C',{�' �x r f � y �ti � ,��,%� . �" �f �SJ' ' � t , .
i � iJ rY'�x'3e • t�.0 � i � .
.Y I..• • L��'�`i7,,,'y.f)YY �"�_ . ...� 1�'��L. Yi�\{... . ry�� �<� .� C�e
�,�,�# ,��j + +x �..t.N . 'a 'S.. 5 • r � •
� � t� 'ti �3i ,r �.—� . ' .�� �ti . � :c'�y{•� +�;: �.
:`•",: _ .0 � . if. ' - T �� - i. 1" y";+:.
'•:? �1��"�, ' r . f. :�, . �„x- � �}; � -� +'^` �- . Y��a''`�h:'s :;r�:�.
� � F t . � 4 HiE! ' - r . � `� � �e' ef , +�� q.a�
y ' . � d� a r - ,e i ^ "�+��•�.'.C�,P•�• �. . - �' i�i�� ' . . . ? .��k' �. �. i' . .
.� � v�'j�.FSt�: f .. a'iF+„J,"y"yw7��y�,�,y) , I[ . t ti+t'1�i��w�};-^.`: t ;F.:
"'Ta. In � d s�.: 1 Y. 'i ��t"} a t't�". ti �' ya' i b� . +'p;y'
+�� •. �°��,��jl�+'��� �'c. � r � ��,,, l9'�?�'Ft�`�G{le�. ��� �j' .. t �� .. �'7" ' ,E� `�. � ;wy�L74.�;,�
� .�i4a�'N'� �'/� �� w � �i.��"�x����'�tw � ; �� . •' - t4'� e t`�, `'` •.
� `r.. � f '. r �, y���
.i bY ��Y ��l J,npK X" � S. � 41"f .• i �. V. �i. ��yr � p+A' 9
�.r r l. � � � � � 1 �}l.[� i � � r . � � %P.
'~ ' � • �.L.-�`""�as� "'�r � . , . �, - y i, y.= •.• � > rn�� y� �v rx . +�. . " �_�'i•� 4C; :,�
.� ... 'L?�'r f ,y �r yr�4� `� f�� . !� 4 If� .` -..F ..r R`�� . �� �10 �.i � �( V� V fl ,Y . .
+;.f� �S'y�..: �F.S_ t F.'"1 ,; �.'� Y ���}�'s �� � • � �� �� � r �'�'
f"� l�'F�,� J J�Y'1 <� `t? 3�,4 �.p4.r .r y� � : �+ rr .e�'ii*
-. . . ' '.'� ` J�T�� ��4 . 'f K�'`� � �:F � �Y;' �, � �' •
� � ' � �:. tiy.,� .w � 7f � �• ~ ,r� dt r yi � . . �.�b"_'�� � .
�t. . ( J . � F j '' � fM,.� � i . {y ~' 1 �
x .. r r ,� ti , r� ,�,. �` �L..
_ . ' ' ��"/ • � k:'' x 3 � _ , ; t�., ��:� �x:+�, ra � Y ; .,: ?G;
j�_Q'y'`} :�(� , . "j R . ...� ..�-�y.`��-�,'L,, �'�
' ' ' � ' .•'`� � ! � ' ;'H� < �t "Y � �L."
� . . f � S: � t , �
� � ��r aL�`f �{ �+.��; ty,� . �44. .. � N tr7 ye P� � J .
. ( .: . . �'� �5�.,,� y ��J@°.ls.�-�'" 1 � �� -� �% os�S y�i�' i^ ,�h� ..t� :'�y'c`• �
� , . �����3y:"�' f 1;zy� •,z"� �' .ti a.e1yu� '; :•.'•a•:1`'
. rs �� r� -� � .�r} , - � ls+ �. �� � `:� . �"� f �
. t . . � s�S . a4+kr� T `��r� ' v ��; �,��� '�y",,��:�,.�� - l� .t - o af �r �X� i � .
^^ ti - � ^t`�*'L{�^ �f�°J"` ��'� i ' y :,j��. a �� 5 . 1 � � FA� . �-• :T y . a ��"� , ' � .
r
+� ...+'y. T #..F ./?'^� �\T'ri ��y.� � 1�y *�s C- -r. ...�j. �: . ci�. - .- �� .{
1 . ` ,. .1 �'V r t * . f� � C �^ .0 jj''.�r�� a;�, qY�R ti H i .r4 rY,d- � � �o � � . �
i:'�X �' Sl�<�{t t �'f'^3V YI f��. ; � Sx'47. �-- w x � a
r� : / � 'L �S�M . y.,� 4'�Y'',�+.�� � Ti'1T� �1p1 t, �y. f !' ?YTa��� Cf �_iili : �l' N.f, � : � �;` yC1Y, . �
�h y7r' . .
' � � .,t'� �� �na* �i h�;�7 t34,:'i4.y.,�s'��s�� ����, , �" v'�� � . .�� :� � , . "t.•y �k`'s" r%:,.,...
��Y h. � Y �e 5s. 33 �{� s _.�%
�`! ' ��'��`±%r . ���� � i �i �a�7 �, ,f �s�t.�� • -��«r� "'' LF�R� '` t h �i ' � � 7�+�4GR .., �
�a,,, '�r�s �s'iti z r '�l ." `.�Ni.Y +S f1 „}�� . .. � p`L+att'^•1 � + � v r . J
4�,+ . � .x' . � y{s x �>t ; 3 ^i- v r � Y$ ..- i � . .-
+':�—� `r r+. .e ^�"{ s ?a r !e � . » ,d r, ,� ,�- .
a'e+�"° r � i �e ia-��� ti - t cS i.;'i.� �.,��j'' ��^M' �! i�i ��i l .�,� f �
ti�"Ya.'� �� � fc._, ti" � e �+e�j �f.� T3. 1�,�'�������� �< Y n
�� a � � y�,�� w ti �s�<� �K;` ����� f, .�� s. -�S �y'3'�r F . . - ��.
� � .:F+';� � rN1 'i tirti.e �S P� .��t 9 � c� � C .'- ��% i� � `�„ �. ' '
� f. . t Y l � t�% 1^� r� e t�. i � r ++� �
� - �' �. 1ti''�i � r`,. �ta! � `4i"c ST 1 �i'� hi * .�Yy,� r �Y� ` � � . .�,� �- x . ,� ' .
- { ` x � �' a ) /€i j ��1 n.'�. ����r� � 'S�y� ��S r� , i li .FY; i ( �,. d.-a ..
� F �.� i � � �� �� ��.
�.�,r s � � K G � ii''�i 'i..3���u'�'7�ti'rq{y+s� .°X 14 '� 7 ... �, • `� r :- c j r'` _ . . �n.,� �� ��F� j �.
� n �: �, �t,;y.�'� . i ,� ti T' � � �.5,; si' .� 1' 'F� S f,.,, � � ;r `. r � '
_'s �'�Tfyy �` ,ip�w�'. �ro x 5t � ��y`,�� ` �i.1� Y :-.�4� �'. ,� , ,M'y�ki'y,.= ��['� c
�}�y5y��.�����i�ti �� r�� yr� 2r�r"r �syn.e� �° �ti�'S� � Pf� ��aR-�'V�<'r h t��J� �.f
r ,�Fr+ �` ��"TJn -� '� '�;`�1 ''t �` �' `'.�,��,4.-r � ` ..., �
W. . 1 z�S Yi fA' l �T'�'. �,. -iY�+l.�� �/ G i, ( �+^Y,,
� � a � �T « ' i 5 �n'^r�1. � �v ��"r 9 S�t`Y t1 {,� u � � �?�c i?k� 5 - � , �
>� *� t'i� k'` ��,""tta � r ei^ Y�.o � �i�"v„-r'�r,�f �rK v nr r�"�h� 'r •.c � �r i
K y.�. � �+� ''� f`,y��.�"'S "�'� '�`'�:'� t of �t �tt.. � � � jii �.,.?�, a"` - �� „��-'*!ca� �? r
s.2.,yr� - ''s}'� 4 'k,,,,�. � ; + �a. L 1`yYi�-a 'Y nur � yi f � S < � d 2 i�J.. y `;�� � -- ♦ {t" �,'Y.
`r�' �"saG: r ��R.,•�` � n ,; 4 �� r�4, il,'yRr �� � vk^�+F1.,� � 4 ��''� � !; �./ �Y ' �
� f 7 :. ,�..� +�, ycry� - _! b y �y � * - .r ��'' ��:�•r �S^�„� x � a ,�i d
? � 7FVk'' �y.� ""�z }'S�� i` �Z� . . .: t3� .4 C +�x �kn � . �,��+r . 1 � � •! C
t{.'+.�ya.�^N �K'J`�� � �'��..nj. K 3�� 1'"` i �i.Ai`� � �a . wu >� � , ,�i�" �� .
1 'a �a,fi�a�'.�,r�'N v. � ,,,Y .•. ��.o�� ti c�„ , i� . .. t
'L' w�r f �a t' ,d.. '' !# a- ^3" ai .. ,t +Y:. �'.�,�'��.
x. ��! � � >>3v a�y'` �, +r �r C �. � '"fi' .+c Va�N ^';.,. � -�' ��
�',,,,r � ,��c'`+�. �� �` � h4-+��.���•.Y� w �t' i� '�y§+,�� �� ,.s��] �" {. , . '°7�� "X'i.z,'}� ,.t'„ � . � . •" �'S y
t4,�.'S�j�Y -.rY;�.. . .s f�. }� fj . . f�` .j S'w� 'v�9. . �r�� : - � ,•..
x � ^t y .t7 `i. � f n . �y'. j � ` �j� S t � � l . � %=y-• �,i,e :����
t s�r � x. ; 7 � ks: � R� � ' 4. �� L�... � +,
�' '� ' ,c �.Y'% i * ��, r k:�i , � � � c ,�r�kk:
�...T.,s�. - a+:r � - r.� - � . i�f'C .�1. -f,%r'' r' ��. � ���w..+ i 'f� • � .
� a � � r . ` >�� • � � , �, � ri. 2, � �: .
; , j,. �r ry�a. i ,S y�e,,n �^.�'y. •+ �-^ � ��� r� f.� f ?� :�K � � 5 } �1 �: .fikya.�[��: �'+a�°a
`t r b . I i ,�� ar..�.y� rl. ,� 3 f �t .�,� , ��� r � �.
�.�,L� . � �n � � � '� �t� ;.i" �.�I4 �y�.yrrryJy� �f. A i ia +� � .* .��5y i
y'�j���r�7'. r,� �.:Y �� F st r...� ,K �.r'tl l��_� �� ��' . �r� .'71(�'�
+ � .. L . 4 Y '� )' , �( � y, . v � � :+• � . .
N , � n : y+ �!� Y . , .t yti :q'
i f .� '�
.,j :5�,�... ; ._; . s' t7 �.i,:.t k . .. xr d.� �
) S s �. � i a,� . ��1t,�e :.
,( � �}..�' ' `f V" � �� .'�
� ' ? S .. �c f y -t
t I^ w`�... ty, i . .�. r� �A�- �� C'iM,� � � F�y.�.
' . � 1 A.{ {i C. '' i Y r� r. �.'
� lt ' � }j�� .. ' `�
y? � J� � n. t. 4 i 1w..
.. � � . I":' f � .
{,•i
� J �. L.; . � ` � l � .. . � � Si.ai`�
t �,�t. .5 � � 4 . � . . t:- .tt
t''G3}: : .�. : � r � � .+';i� C:. :y.
' - .�::`.� ... ...t �. :.. ., , ., y
�
:� �.
¢ ���;
» ���,. �.
.,, l �,'
_.. t:�
�
--_../
r
I
1
�
� .
� +
-----------------------------------/
MISSISSIPPI STREET
�� �a
----_ � T.._ —� _ -- — -_ = !� aROP~cuae `---------------1 �'`---
��� � — � f
� TCI BE RE110�E�
6818 CtC TO B�E �V D� — �.' --
, 8818 CieC
6 3
�C�_---� ,� �—_________ �
� ,o
' uQuoR '�= '° �_ 1•I1 i�- -� L
' �� � � � r
i STORE I� I � I+ ----- �
� j \. � iL _ J` � I
� ____=__� ( i9 e6ia \ L_J
� �
"'_ -� tb4ix �ac rt _ _ `
� / \ ------�
I , � �
f r--~---- . °�.�e i
�_� � ? ,
. ,
\� � r
\ I �
� ` I. I
� �� \ I� I
� \ lw I
Ij I
� I I
\ � {
� I I
�� L
�+
_; _ J
� �
���/i
� � �" f
� � I� �
I
1 I$ � _
-- ����L-
13F
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager 11� � PW91-254
qt
FROM: John G. Flora,�rublic Works Director
DATE: August 19, 1991
SUBJECT: 6 Cities WMO 1992 Budget
The 6 Cities Watershed Management Organization has submitted a
budget to the City of $10,000 which is the same as it has been for
the last 2 years. In order to be consistent with the Joint Powers
Agreement establishing the WMO, each City must receive the budget
and approve it.
Recommend the City Council receive and approve the 6 Cities
Watershed Management Organization budget for 1992 at $10,000.
JGF/ts
14
�
�
F1��
�
ities
���
-s�oo Blaine " r�
�ss-s22i Columbia Heights
x�-2aao Coon Rapids
5r-anso • Fridley
sn - zo� Hill Top
7a►-eos, spring take Park
..,.......
����%�
� ._ ,r �_�,.,.�. �....,, .�.,..,,, 1^.....,.n.,,,,
,.., � ..,ti..,.,.�,.�....�.. ..........,.... �.,�,.. ,
.Iu�.�r 23, 1991 ,
,. _ .
�.
v: ..�'I�:�. .��:� �.�:� r:��`� � �
.�.�..��.�.... .,� �
,.,�.>.�,.�s::�;�r::l�ar��:....�___.u._.�._..__. .__--�------- - - .,_. �...,.�..�..,.,.,..�._�.. _._�.�........._.. ..,......�..
h;;;.�,...~:.. -
. .� . _ ... nn..v..w..q�..�..y..�� .. „.��, : kr f.. r ...... H. +r ...r. .. r. �......oa..�....- w �. v.,.. ....
��������x
. ......�.�..�^..�..:�:n.�._.�_.�___��_._� . �. ,�.:� . .�.�._..� .��...�.� , _..... . ._,. ...
�
� . . M.�.�,.....,�..�....�.�.....�.w� � �_.....µ ...,...,...�.
�..
���....�..,..�.�..� ��.....�.. �..�.�.��M,...
~ ��� ac��.� :
` ce` Bcr�rd L�"e,.�er�: � _ : �
14A
�
SIX CITIES WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
RESOLUTION N0. 91-02
ESTABLISHING BUDGET FOR 1992
�
WHEREAS, the annual budget of the Six Cities Watershed Management
Organization shall be established in August to conform to the
budgetary requirements of its member cities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT_ RESOLVED by the members of the Six Cities
Watershed Management Organization that the 1992 operating budget be
established as follows: � .
..
Attorney S' 4, 500
Insurance $ 3,500
Administr�;.tion $ 1, 000
Audit � S 1,000
TOTAL BUDGET $10,000
The Six Cities Watershed Management Organization resolves that a
levy is required to meet the budget in 1992. The Treasurer is
hereby authorized and directed to prepare a letter and notification
to member cities advising them of our levy requirements.
PASSED by the Members of the Six Cities Watershed Management
Organization this 18th day of Julv , 1991.
ATTEST:
Charles Lenthe, Secretary
. �
John G. Flora, Chairman
MEMORANDUM
_ Municipal Center
�_ 6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridiey, Minnesota 55432
�RypF {612) 572-3507
��Y FAX: (612) 571-1287
William C. Hunt
Assistant to the City Manager
1 �.
Memo To: (�Tilliam W. Burns, City Manaqer���
• to the Cit Mana er �
From. William C. xunt, Assistant y q��/
Subject: Chanqe in Date of December 16, 1991 Council Meetinq
Date: Auqust 20, 1991
It has come to our attention that the December National League of
Cities Conference has been rescheduled since the Council meeting
schedule for 1991 was established. As a result, there is a
conflict with the December 16, 1991 Council meeting. If the
Fridley City Council wishes to change the Council meeting date from
December 16, 1991 to December 9, 1991 it will require a motion to
that effect. Such a motion would be appropriate at the Council
meeting of August 26, 1991.
WCH/jb
MEMORANDUM
- Municipal Center
'_ 6431 University Avenue Northeast
Fridiey, Minnesota 55432
p-n(pF (612) 572-3507
Fw�r Fax: �s� 2� s�y -� 28�
Memo To: Nilliam W. Burns,
From: William C. 8unt,
wllllalri C. HUIIt
Assistant to the City Manager
Cit Mana er ,
Y g � `ru
Assistant to the City Manaqer .
�
8ubject: Authorization of Temporary Emplopees
Date: Auqust 16, 1991
I am attaching copies of a resolution authorizing eleven temporary
positions as permanent positions as well as the draft of the
appointments for concurrence by the City Council at the August 26
meeting. Perhaps you would like to review these before they are
presented to the Council at the August 26 meeting.
WCH/jb
� s
RESOLIITION NO. - 1991
A RESOLIITION AIITHORIZING CERTAIN POSITIONS AS PERMANENT
FOR THE PIIRPOSS OF INCLIISION IINDER THE PROVISIONB OF
CHAPTER 3 OF THE CODE OF CITY ORDINANCEB
WHEREAS, in addition to employees occupying positions authorized by the
City Council as permanent full-time positions, Section 3.11 of the City
Code states: "The City Manager shall have the power . . to make rules
and regulations for the employment of temporary, part-time and contract
employees . . . ."; and
WHEREAS, from time to time it becomes evident that certain temporary
positions established to deal with short-term staffing needs extend for
a number of years and respond to on-going staffing needs of the City:
and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has identified certain positions, originally
established as temporary, which do, in fact, respond to on-going
staffing needs of the City and which have been filled continuously over
a number of years; and
WHEREAS, it is fitting that these positions be authorized as full-time
permanent positions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Gity Council of the City of
Fridley that the following eleven (il) positions be authorized as full-
time permanent positions:
Public Information Specialist, City Manager's Office
Secretary, Finance Department
MIS Specialist, Finance Department
Planning Assistant, Community Development Department
Planning Assistant, Community Development Department
Secretary, Community Development Department
Engineering Technician/Inspector, Public Works Department
Senior Citizen Program Coordinator, Recreation and Natural
Resource Department
Program Specialist, Recreation and Natural Resource Department
Interpretive Specialist, Recreation and Natural Resource
Department
Receptionist/Clerk Typist, Recreation and Natural Resource
Department
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1991.
ATTEST:
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
16A
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
Name
James
Froehle
R. Marcelle
Everette
Charlotte
Eckman
Elizabeth
Campbell
Michele
McPherson
D. Lynne
Saba
Jon
Thompson
Constance
Thompson
Deborah
Campobasso
August 26, 1991
Position
Public Info.
Specialist
Exempt
Secretary
Non-exempt
MIS
Specialist
Non-exempt
Planning
Assistant
Exempt
Planning
Assistant
Exempt
Secretary
Non-exempt
Eng. Tech./
Inspector
Non-exempt
Senior Citzn
Pgrm Coord.
Exempt
Program
Specialist
Exempt
Starting
Salarv
$25,157.28
per year
$2,096.44
per month
$ 9.87
per hour
$1,717.55
per month
$13.93
per hour
$2,423.00
per month
$27,769.80
per year
$2,314.15
per month
$27,769.80
per year
$2,314.15
per month
$10.34
per hour
$1,799.34
per month
$16.06
per hour
$2,794.22
per month
$32,036.40
per year
$2,669.70
per month
$26,507.52
per year
$2,208.96
per month
.:
Starting
Date
Sept. 9,
1991
Sept. 9,
1991
Sept. 9,
1991
Sept. 9,
1991
Sept. 9,
1991
Sept. 9,
1991
Sept. 9,
1991
Sept. 9,
1991
Sept. 9,
1991
Replaces
Newly
Authorized
Position
Newly
Authorized
Position
Newly
Authorized
Position
Newly
Authorized
Position
Newly
Authorized
Position
Newly
Authorized
Position
Newly
Authorized
Position
Newly
Authorized
Position
Newly
Authorized
Position
Appointments by
August 26, 1991
Page Two
SCOtt
Ramsay
Janice
Swanson
the City Council
Interpretive
Specialist
Exempt
Receptionist/
Clerk Typist
Non-exempt
$27,769.80
per year
$2,314.15
per month
$ 9.35
per hour
$1,626.55
per month
16C
Sept. 9,
1991
Sept. 9,
1991
Newly
Authorized
Position
Newly
Authorized
Position
RESOLIITION NO. - 1991
A RESOLIITION AIITHORIZING AN ADDITION TO THS
CONTRACT OF THE CITY MANAGER TO ALLOW FOR
REIMBIIRSEMENT OF ANNIIAL LEAVE
WHEREAS, under the Annual Leave Plan for Non-Union Employees
effective January 1, 1983, approved by the Fridley City Council on
December 22, 1982, provision is made for employees to exchange
annual leave for cash under certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, it is fitting that the benefits accruing to the City
Manager be at least equal to the benefits provided to other city
employees; and
WHEREAS, in the contract between the City of Fridley and the City
Manager, William W. Burns, dated August 29, 19��, and amended by
Resolution No. 61 - 1989 on July 10, 1989, there is no specific
provision for the above referenced exchange of annual leave for
cash;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Fridley that the following clause be added to the contract of the
City of Fridley with the City Manager, William W. Burns:
13. Once a year, at a time designated by the City, BURNS
shall have the opportunity to exchange up to five
(5) days of accumulated annual leave for cash.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1991.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
SHIRLEY A. HAAPALA - CITY CLERK
17
19
20
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
GAS SERVICES
Erickson Plbg Htg Cool Inc
440 Pierce Street
Anoka MN 55303
Rollins Heating & A/C
2420 W Co Rd C
Roseville MN 55113
Support Services
13589 - 67th Place N
Maple Grove, MN 55369
(�FNFjZAL CONTRACTOR
Midwest Siding & Remodeling
503 Andall St
Lino Lakes, MN 55014
M. A. Family Trust
5750 Jefferson St NE
Fridley MN 55432
R & M Associates
3482 Auger Ave
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Universal Homes
6209 Maryland Ave N
Brooklyn Park MN 55369
HEATING
Erickson Plbg Htg Cool Inc
440 Pierce Street
Anoka MN 55303
Rollins Heating & A/C
2420 W Co Rd C
Roseville MN 55113
Support Services
13589 - 67th Place N
Maple Grove, MN. 55369
Ron Erickson
Joyce Laird �
Phil Ebert
Pat Ready
Roger Leffler
Ray Palme
Randal Zappa
Ron Erickson
Joyce Laird
Phil Ebert
1 ��
LICENSES
CLYDE WILEY
Bldg/Mech Insp.
Same
Same
DARREL CLARK
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Same
Same
Same
CLYDE WILEY
Bldg/Mech Insp.
Same
Same
PLUMBING
Galascy Mechanical Contr Inc
3151 - 101st Ave NE
Blaine, MN 55434
Warren Zimmerman
1 :
STATE OF MINN
C� t1.�:7
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Auqust 26, 1991
�LOCATION OF BUILDING
DUPLEXES & SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS:
DAVID HALEK
MATTSON PROPERTIES
STANLEY MEINEN
REGGIE & DARBY TRUEHL
GEORGE LUNDE
DONALD KOSS
JOHN & KATHLEEN BAUMHOFER
JAMES & JOYCE VINT
DANIEL NELSON
n
TAMMY & TERRY MARQUARDT
WILLIAM OUELLETTE
GEORGE & NELL DAVIS
SEAN MURPHY
THORNTON & BUTGUSAIN
WAYNE NELSON
SARTAJ & NEETA SAHNI
J. LEVANDER & N. OWEN
GARY MUSKE
MICHAEL BETZ
KIRYLO & LITA CZICHRAY
VIOLA FRONEYBERGER
JOHN ZIELINSKI
CLARENCE & LILLIAN FISCHER
AP & JUNE NICHOLS
JEROME & RAYE THOMPSON
CARVER PARK RENTALS
FOREST CORNELIUM
AUREN KERNTOP
FRANK SCHOENBERGER
JOHN CHURA
JOHN & DEBORAH MASTLEY
DANIEL WINTERSTEEN
ALLAN & BEV MATTSON
TERRANCE DREYER
R. CROWELL & P. MUESING
AL SCHIRO
DELORES PONESSA
JOHN CRIST
S. WILLIAMS & P. RUSTAD
JAMES ISLER
VICTOR & DELORIS DAML
MARITA LARSON
��
ROBERT SHIMANSKI
7313-15 ABLE ST
7325-27 ABLE ST
7349-51 ABLE ST
7365-67 ABLE ST
7401-03 ABLE ST
7447-49 ABLE ST
7463-65 ABLE ST
6880 BROOKVIEW
6070 CENTRAL AVE (F)
6070 CENTRAL AVE (R)
6588-92 CENTRAL AVE
7432 CONCERTO CURVE
6210-20 E RIVER RD
6276 E RIVER RD
7325-27 EVERT CT
7330-32 EVERT CT
7335-37 EVERT CT
7345-47 EVERT CT
1301-03 FIRESIDE DR
7865-69 FIRWOOD WAY
7879-81 FIRWOOD WAY
7883-85 FIRWOOD WAY
7889-91 FIRWOOD WAY
7893-97 FIRWOOD WAY
6091-93 HICKORY DR
411-13 IRONTON ST
421-23 IRONTON ST
4020-22 MAIN ST
5835 MAIN ST
5857 MAIN ST
5971-73 MAIN ST
6019 MAIN ST
6671-81 MAIN ST
120 MISS ST
1230-32 NORTON AVE
1237-39 NORTON AVE
1241-43 NORTON AVE
1260-62 NORTON AVE
1261-63 NORTON AVE
1270-72 NORTON AVE
1285-87 NORTON AVE
174-76 PEARSON WAY
6315-17 PIERCE ST
6325-27 PIERCE ST
6335 PIERCE ST
LICENSES
Page 1
UNITS
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
2
2
1
2
1
1
4
2
4
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
FEE
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
36.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
36.00
24.00
36.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
APPRQVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE P'LROO� TION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
�
_ FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICENSES
_,�,,,^ Auqust 26, 1991 Page 2
OWNER
DOUGLAS BTANNER
DON JOHANNS
CAROLE GADKE-ERGE
JERRY JACOSON
ARTHUR QUIGGLE III
ANDREW KOCISCAK
VERNON LINDBERG
ED & DORIS CHIES
DANIEL FAY
ED & DORIS CHIES
SYLVIA HOLMEN
ROBERT HOSMAN
AL BATES
VIOLET ROCEK
EDWARD OTREMBA
RING BENSON APTS
KENNEY BILLET
ANDREW KOCISCAK
NHC PROPERTIES
RONALD & PATRICIA
JOSEPH SINIGAGLIO
WAYNE JOHNSON
J & B PROPERTIES
STEPHEN & DOREEN
RICHARD KAPPES
DOUGLAS FIEGE
BEVERLY MATTSON
RUTH MAGNUSON
KAREN BESCH
GARY MUSKE
WILLIAM GUENTHER
ROY ERICKSON
TIMOTHY PARKER
ELLERT IHLAN
i�[����s�
LISCHALK
JOSEPH & IRENE MAERTENS
DOUGLAS FINCH
WALL COMPANIES
n
TIMOTHY FIETEK
JAMES PEARSON
ROBERT HUBER
CHARLES WESTLING
RODNEY BILLMAN
��
-LOCATION OF BUILDING
6355-57 PIERCE ST
6373-77 PIERCE ST
6389-91 PIERCE ST
6401 PIERCE ST
101 �PILOT AVE
1631 RICE CRK RD
6140-44 STAR IN
7337-39 UNIV AVE
7361-63 UNIV AVE
7373-75 UNIV AVE
5816 2ND ST
5940-42 2ND ST
5783-5 2 1/2 ST
5791 2 1/2 ST
5057 3RD ST
5069-71 3RD ST
5121-23 3RD ST
5131-35 3RD ST
5141-43 3RD ST
5181-83 3RD ST
5191-93 3RD ST
6051-53-55 3RD ST
5339 4TH ST
5357 4TH ST
5370 4TH ST
5461 4TH ST
5820-22 4TH ST
5830-32 4TH ST
5840-42 4TH ST
5850-52 4TH ST
5860-62 4TH ST
5900-02 4TH ST
5916-18 4TH ST
5924-26 4TH ST
6232-34 5TH ST
6262-64 5TH ST
6303-6305 5TH ST
6337-6339 5TH ST
6401-6403 5TH ST
6431-6433 5TH ST
6459-6461 5TH ST
6487-6489 5TH ST
5346-48 6TH ST
5606-08 6TH ST
5335-37 6TH ST
5536-38 7TH ST
6300 7TH ST
6310 7TH ST
UNITS
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
FEE
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
36.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
�PPR4VED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE �Q�CTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
LV
�
�
OWNER
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Auqust 26, 1991
RODNEY BILLMAN
u
n
JOHN SACCOMAN
ROBERT RUSSELL
WILLYAM FOGERTY
MEYER & JOANNE BRODER
GARY KNUTSON
RODNEY BILLMAN
n
��
W.E. DOELZ
n
GORDON & ALTA JOHNSON
GARY MUSKE
GARY MUSKE
DENNIS KUGLER
GARY MUSKE
ED CHIES
CHARLES GRAMITH
MULTIPLE DWELLING•
F. GORDON TORGERUD
DONALD TOPEL
RUSSELL BECK
RONALD BURG
JOHN CZECH
n
PREMIUM INVESTMENTS
n
NATHAN SCIiWARTZ
n
n
A & L MGMT. CO.
��
n
0
FILISTER ENTERPRISES
n
a
n
n
n
��
u
n
u
LOCATION OF BUILDING
6350 7TH ST
6360 7TH ST
6380 7TH ST
451-53 54TH AVE
217=19 57TH PL
349-53 57TH PL
276-78 58TH AVE
114-16 62ND WAY
401 63RD AVE
415 63RD AVE
445 63RD AVE
70-80 63 1/2 WAY
90-100 63 1/2 WAY
1333-35 73RD AVE
1581-83 73RD AVE
1591-93 73RD AVE
1560-64 73 1/2 AVE
1590-94 73 1/2 AVE
360-62 74TH AVE
380-82 74TH AVE
LICENSES
Page 3
6534 CENTRAL AVE
6542 CENTRAL AVE
7150,2,4,6 CENTRAL AVE
7170-6 CENTRAL AVE
6501 CHANNEL RD
6531 CHANNEL RD
6551 CHANNEL RD
6571 CHANNEL RD
101 CHARLES ST
179 CHARLES ST
180 CHARLES ST
1200 CHERI LA
1230 CHERI LA
1260 CHERI LA
1290 CHERI LA
5640 E RIVER RD
5660 E RIVER RD
5680 E RIVER RD
5720 E RIVER RD
5740 E RIVER RD
5760 E RIVER RD
5780 E RIVER RD
5800 E RIVER RD
5820 E RIVER RD
584Q E RIVER RD
UNIT� FEE
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
11
11
12
12
12
18
18
18
18
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
12.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
61.00
61.00
61.00
61.00
109.00
109.00
109.00
109.00
109.00
109.00
109.00
109.00
109.00
109.00
APPRQVED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PfLROOTEECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Auqust 26, 1991
OWNER
FILISTER ENTERPRISES
R. JAMES DAY
KERSI & KRISHNA JAIN
RIVER RD EAST CORP
JOANN CIRKS
FIVE SANDS DEV.
u
0
u
0
LEONARD DAILEY
RICHARD DEMPSEY
ARNOLD ELMQUIST
n
n
BIGOS PROPERTIES
n
MILTON & ELLEN HUGHES
��
n
ARNO & MARJORIE ROSIN
DUANE TOLLEFSON
LAURENCE & KAREN RUSSELL
RICHARD & SOZANNE FEIST
GERALD ENGDAHL
ROBERT & KATHLEEN ANDRES
MAYNARD & ELAYNE NIELSEN
CHRIS JELEVAROV
WALL COMPANIES
PARK ASSOCIATES
u
0
CHRIS JELEVAROV
LANG-NELSON
��
713 COMPANY
GARY SODAHL
THOMAS WOLFF
EXPERT REALTY MGMT.
R. BLESI & R. WARD
HERBERT AAKER
CHESTER GROMEK
ALPHONSE & REGINA KLISCH
R. SMITH & J. WEBER
JOHN CONDA
JOHN RASMUSSEN
MIKE MEZZENGA
ROGER BLESI
LOCATION OF BUILDING
5860 E RIVER RD
5940 E RIVER RD
5950 E RIVER RD
6540-50 E RIVER RD
LICENSEB
Page 4
655I E RIVER RD
7805 E RIVER RD
7825 E RIVER RD
7845 E RIVER RD
7875 E RIVER RD
7895 E RIVER RD
8191 E RIVER RD
6341 HWY 65
6370 HWY 65
6393 HWY 65
6417 HWY 65
5100 HORIZON DR
5101 HORIZON DR
6670 LUCIA LA
6680 LUCIA LA
6690 LUCIA LA
7400 LYRIC LA _
4030 MAIN ST
6011 MAIN ST
6021 MAIN ST
6035 MAIN ST
117 MISS PL
157 MI$S PL
160 MISS PL
460 MISS ST
610 OSBORNE RD
630 & 650 OSBORNE RD
670 & 690 OSBORNE RD
6471-77 RIVERVIEW TERR
155-175 SATELLITE LA
195 SATELLITE LA
221 SATELLITE LA
6111 STAR LA
5770 2ND ST
5801 2ND ST
5848 2ND ST
6061 2ND ST
6511 2ND ST
6530 2ND ST
6551 2ND ST
5800 2 1/2 ST
5846 2 1/2 ST
5901 2 1/2 ST
5924 2 1/2 ST
UNITS
42
12
12
141
11
59
59
59
59
59
5
10
15
7
7
5
5
16
16
16
8
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
103
9
34
34
3
33
20
12
18
8
3
8
4
4
4
7
4
6
4
7
FEE
109.00
49.00
49.00
307.00
49.00
143.00
143.00
143.00
143.00
143.00
36.00
49.00
55.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
57.00
57.00
57.00
49.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
231.00
49.00
93.00
93.00
36.00
91.00
65.00
49.00
61.00
49.00
36.00
49.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
APPR�VED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE PROTECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
2�F
CITYOF
fRIDLEY
OWNER
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Auqust 26, 1991
DALE & BERNADETTE KNOTT
HERBERT AAKER
ARNOLD ELMQUIST
u
n
n
u
JOHN MILLER
n
n
��
MILTON CARLSON
BIGOS PROPERTIES
a
��
n
u
n
n
��
JOHN RASMUSSEN
JIM WEATHERLY
DIANE & MARGUERITE SCHWARTZ
JOHN JENSEN
V. HOIUM & D. OTTERNESS
LAURETTA WELTER
WORTE ASSOCIATES
RINEHART KURTZ
RICHARD TKACZIK
ROSCOE & HARRIET SMITH
WALL COMPANIES
0
0
NEIL SCHULDT
JAMES PENG
WALL COMPANIES
n
ANTHONY & EVANGELINE NICKLOW
KENNETH FRANKO
u
MARCK INV. CO.
n
n
n
BIGOS PROPERITES
n
CLARENCE REZAC
WILLIAM & LINDA TOIVONEN
�LOCATION OF BUILDING
5980 2 1/2 ST
6060 2 1/2 ST
4901 3RD ST
4913 3RD 5T
4921 3RD ST
4939 3RD ST
4949 3RD ST
4965 3RD ST
4985 3RD ST
5005 3RD ST
5025 3RD ST
5035 3RD ST
5200 3RD ST
5201 3RD ST
5230 3RD ST
5231 3RD ST
5260 3RD ST
5261 3RD ST
5290 3RD ST
5291 3RD ST
5955-65 3RD ST
5401 4TH ST
5347-49 4TH ST
5419 4TH ST
5644 4TH ST
5370 5TH ST
5400 5TH ST
5420 5TH ST
5450 5TH ST
5451 5TH ST
6311-6329 5TH ST
6347-6365 5TH ST
6409-6427 5TH ST
5410 5TH ST
5428 5TH ST
6437-6455 5TH ST
6465-6483 5TH ST
5400-2 7TH ST
5612 7TH ST
5640 7TH ST
1050 52ND AVE
1090 52ND AVE
1120 52ND AVE
1170 52ND AVE
215 53RD AVE
305 53RD AVE
251 57TH PL
359 57TH PL
LICENSES
Page 5
UNIT� FEE
4
4
7
7
7
7
7
11
11
11
11
7
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
4
4
3
4
7
3
4
4
6
32
16
16
16
4
4
16
16
3
11
11
16
16
16
16
4
7
7
8
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.0
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
36.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
89.00
57.00
57.00
57.00
36.00
36.00
57.00
57.00
36.00
49.00
49.00
57.00
57.00
57.00
57.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
49.00
APPRO_VED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE 2 OO�ECTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
VI
r �
��
OWNER
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Auqust 26, 1991
DAVID RUST
GLEN PETERSON
DANIEL O'NEILL
WICKLOW PROPERTIES
FIT BAR ENTERPRISES
CURTIS BOSTROM
RICE CRK TOWNHOUSE CO
�
u
n
�
��
�
��
�
n
�
n
�
n
n
�
��
�
n
�
n
�
n
�
n
EDRIC ASSOCIATES
ROGER MEYER
GEORGE KNOLL, JR
RESHETAR SYSTEMS
BUILDING MANAGEMENT
R & B PROPERTIES
RUDY BAYER
MELVIN & ANNA HARTMAN
RUDY BAYER
TAG PROPERTIES
MELVIN & ANNA HARTMAN
WALTER KUCKES
AUREN KERNTOP
UNIV. AVE ASSOC.
n
��
n
�LOCATION OF BUILDING
LICENSES
Page 6
262 57TH PL
380 57TH PL
390 57TH PL
150 59 1/2 WAY
151�59 1/2 WAY
190 59 1/2 WAY
1566-8-70-2-4-6 68TH AVE
1579-81-3-5-7-9 68TH AVE
1590-2-4-6 68TH AVE
1591-3-5-7 68TH AVE
1600-2-4-6-8-10 68TH AVE
1601-3-5-7-9-11 68TH AVE
1612-4-6-8 68TH AVE
1613-5-7-9 68TH AVE
1620-2-4-6-8-30 68TH AVE
1621-3-5-7-9-31 68TH AVE
1632-4-6-8 68TH AVE
1633-5-7-9 68TH AVE
1640-2-4-6-8-50 68TH AVE
1641-3-5-7-9-51 68TH AVE
1652-4-6-8 68TH AVE
1653-5-7-9 68TH AVE
1660-2-4-6-8-70 68TH AVE
1661-3-5-7-9-91 68TH AVE
1672-4-6-8-80-2 68TH AVE
1673-5-7-9-81-3 68TH AVE
1560-2-4-6-8-70 69TH AVE
1590-2-4-6 69TH AVE
1600-2-4-6 69TH AVE
1630-2-4-6-8-40 69TH AVE
1650-2-4-6-8 69TH AVE
1200 72ND AVE
1230-2-4-6 72ND AVE
1270-76 72ND AVE
1441 73RD AVE
1619 73RD AVE
351 74TH AVE
371 74TH AVE
211 79TH WAY
371 74TH AVE
181 79TH WAY
211 79TH WAY
231 79TH WAY
321 79TH WAY
101 83RD AVE
121 83RD AVE
131 83RD AVE
141 83RD AVE
UNITS
8
4
4
12
12
12
6
6
4
6
4
6
4
6
4
4
6
6
6
4
6
42
4
4
18
24
11
4
8
4
8
8
7
8
41
42
36
36
FEE
49.00
36.00
36.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00�
109.00
36.00
36.00
61.00
73.00
49.00
36.00
49.00
36.00
49.00
49.00
36.00
49.00
107.00
109.00
97.00
97.00
APPR�VED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE P�LR O u TION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
r�
�PPR4VED BY R.H. LARSON, FIRE P1�Q��CTION BUREAU/HOUSING INSPECTOR
1
'
C(iYOF
fRIDLEY
FOR CONCIIRRENCE BY THE CITY COIINCIL
AIIGUST 26, 19991
Chemlawn Commercial Services
1156 East Highway 36
Maplewood,MN 55109
ESTIMATES
Corridor Maintenance Project
No. 217
FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4, 462. 58
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
200 Coon Rapids Boulevard
Suite 400
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Services Rendered as City Attorney
for the Month of July, 1991 . . . . . . . . . . $
Newquist & Ekstrum,�Chartered
301 Fridley Plaza Office Building
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Services Rendered as City Prosecuting
Attorney for the Month of July, 1991 ......$
Allied Blacktop
10503 - 89th Avenue North
Maple Grove, MN 55369
6,620.50
8,298.00
Street Improvement Project
No. ST. 1991-10 (Sealcoat)
Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 77, 095.88
21
21A
�
FROM: City of Fridley Engineering Oivision
T0: Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Fridley
6431 U�iversity Avenue N.E.
Fridley, Minnesota 55�32
DATE: AU6UST 12, 1941
CONTkACT ITEM
Maintenance Services
TOTAL
i.ITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC NORKS DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
CQRRIDOk MAJNTENANCE PRDJECT # 217
STATEMENT OF MORK
ESTIMATED UNIT
QUANTITY PRICE UNIT
1.00 15,522.00 LUMP SUM
-
�.
RE: Estia�te No.�4 lFINAU
Period 7-15 -91 to
8-01-91
FOR: CNEMLAMN SERVICES CORP.
1f56 E.HI6NMAY 36
MAPLEM000 MN. 55109
484-2700
GUAkTITY THIS
E5TIMATE TOTAL
0. 25 t
TOTAL
AMOUNT
f15,522.00
----------------------------------------------
f15,522.00
.
SUMMARY:
Original Contract A�ount
Contract Additio�s
Contr�ct Deductions
Revise� Cantract A�ount
Value Co�pleted To Date
Aaount Retained To Qate lOX)
Less A�ount Paid Previausly
AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTitEfITE
CERTIFICATE Of THE CONTRACTOR
, 101-Ob-635-�2400-63b4
f15,522.0U
t0.00
f0.00
f15,522.00
f15,522.00
i0.06
f11,059.42
t4,462.58
1 herehy tertify that the Mork perfor�ed and the ��terials supplied to date under the ter�s of the tontract for this
pro)ect, and ali anthorized changes thereto, have an actual value under the contract of the a�ounts shown on this
esti�ate (and the fiaal quantities an the final esti�ate are correcti, and that tfiis esti�ate is just and correct and no
part���l�.��A unt D� is Esti�ate' has been received.
1�..� � -� 1�--. �l
�
BY----------------------------------------------- Date ------------------
Contractor's Authorited Representative lTitle?
CERTIFICATE OF THE EN6INEEk
I hereby tertify that I have prepared or exa�i�ed this esti�ate, and that the contrictor is entitled #o pay�ent of this
esti�ate under the contract for reference project.
CITY Of fRI
�
����y --jjj
��
Checked By
lPPRPA6E1`A6
RPA6EZ`A6P
RPA6E3`A6PP
21C
Date __�_-�- (__� ^� l
Respectfully Subritted,
f ,
��� � ����� ���������� �����
n 6. flara�P.E.
Public Morks Oirector
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
6431 IIniversity Ave., N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
AUGUST 12, 1991
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Fridley
C/O William W. Burns, City Manager
6431 University Ave., N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Council Members:
CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER
.
We hereby submit the Final Estimate for CORRIDOR MAINTENANCE
PROJECT NO. 217 for Chemlawn Services Corp., 1156 E. Highway 36,
Maplewood, MN, 55109.
We have viewed the work under contract for the construction af
CORRIDOR NIAINTENANCE PROJECT NO. 217 and find the same is
substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents.
I recommend that'final payment be made upon acceptance of the work
by your Honorable Body and that the one-year contractural
maintenance bond commence on August 5, 1991.
Respectfully submitted,
��_
ohn G. Flora, P.E.
Director of Public Works
21D
Prepared by
Checked by:
August 12, 1991
City of Fridley
CORRIDOR MAINTENANCE PROJECT NO. 217
J
CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR
This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement
of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done for
the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and
specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is
$15,522.00 and the final payment of $4,462.58 for the improyement
project would cover in full, the contractor's claims against the
City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor
under this project.
I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is
just and correct.
CHEMLAWN SERVICES CORP.
,,,�� �`
Mark Sullivan, Project Superintendent
21E
August 12, 1991
To: Public Works Director
City of Fridley
REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR
CITY OF FRIDLEY
CORRIDOR MAINTENANCE PROJECT NO. 217
We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and
find that the work required by the contract is substantially
complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the
project.
All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the
work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a
reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor.
So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the
attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year
maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspection
that being AUGUST 5, 1991.
Jon _ShD�Sson, Construc'tJ'ion Inspector
Contractor�Representative, (Title)
21F
August 12, 1991
City of Fridley
CORRIDOR MAINTENANCE PROJECT NO. 217
�
PREVAILING WAGE VERIFICATION
This is to certify that CHEMLAWN SERVICES CORP. has abided by the
Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department
of Labor and Industry for Anoka County.
I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is
just and correct.
CHEMLAWN SERVICES CORP.
�ti ��
Mark Sullivan, Project Superintendent
21G