03/01/1993 - 4954WILLIAM W. BIIRNS
CITY MANAGER
COIINCIL MEBTING
MARCH 1, 1993
I -
r;;
�
�
CINOF
FRIDLEY
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
MARCH 1, 1993
PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATE
OF APPRECIATION:
Wade Savage for Service on the
Rice Creek Watershed District
Board of Managers
PRESENTATION OF AWARD:
National Night Out Award
. . -
PROCLAMATION: • �
Volunteers of America Week: March 7- 14, 1993
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
�
City Council Meeting of February ,22, i 993
n
FR
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 1
ADOPT��N OF AGENDA:
OPEN FORUM. VISITORS:
(Consideration of Items Not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
OLD BUSINESS:
First Reading of an Ordinance Amending
Chapter 2 and Section 4.04 of the ����
Fridley City Charter (Tabled January 19,
1993) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
-W , � �
�
Second Reading of an Ordinance to Amend �
the City Code of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, by Making a Change in Zoning
Districts [Rezoning, ,ZOA #88-04 by
Community Development Corporation
�
1 - 1J
���-��, °�-�
(Westminster)] ................ . .........
3�`
�(a�
�
2-2K
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 1, 1993
NEW BUSINESS:
Receive Items from the Pianning Commission
• Meeting of February 24, f 993: . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3W
• ,�.
A. Speciai Use Permit Request, � - ,/q►�
SP #93-01, by Westminster + ,� 31�5
Corporation, to �Ilow Homes
for the Elderly, Generally .����c�
Located North and East of U
St. William's ChurctarAbutting
Fifth Street N.�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3GG �
B. Resolution Approving a
Subdivision, Lot Split, `
L.S. #93-01, to Create Two
Separate Parcels Generally
Located North of 61 st
Avenue and West of Fifth
,
���-
�
� S lQ�
3��
Street (Westminster .
Corporation) . . . . . . . . . . .'! . . .� . . . . 3HH - 3YY
3
. �/'�.1,�,� �..., � _ .,�- �ti�
Receive Proposal for Curbside an
Multi-Unit Recycling Services . . . . � . . � �G�� . 4 - 4J
��,� ���G/ ,,� '
` � � �` .
Receive Bids and .�ward Co:ntra��r.,_��{,.�x-
Storm and Sanitary Sewer Repair ��
Project No. 242 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5E
!/1 '
THE MINIIT�S OF THB FRIDLFY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF
FEBRQARY 22, 1993
THE MINUTES OF THS REGIII;1�tR` 1�EETING OF THE �FRIDLEY CITY OUNCIL OF
FEBRUARY 22. 1993
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:34 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALI�EGIANCE :
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL•
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman
Billings, Councilman Schneider and Councilman
Fitzpatrick
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
PRE5ENTATION OF CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION:
WADE SAVAGE FOR SERVICE ON THE RICE �REEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
BOARD OF MANAGERS:
Mayor Nee stated that Mr. Savage was unable to attend the meeting
this evening, and this presentation woul�l be postponed until the
next meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING, FEBRUARY l, 1993:�
MOTION by Councilwoman� Jorgenson to approve the minutes as
presented. Seconded by Councilman BilTings. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
� I�Ii�TION by Councilman Billings to adopt tt�e agenda as submitted.
Seconded by CounciZwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. .
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
There was no response from the audience under this item of
business.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETINC3 (7�":'FLBRIIARY 22. 1993 PAGE 2
OLD BUSINESS•
1. APPROVE 1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION
AND REALLOCATION OF THE 1991 AND 1992 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT FUNDS (TABLED FEBRUARY 1. 1993):
Mayor Nee removed this item from the table.
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that the City
received notification at the end of January that $134,400 in
Community Development Block Grants would be received for 1993. She
stated it is recommended that $98,800 be allocated to the housing
rehabilitation program; $30,600 be allocated to human services;
$4,000 be allocated for juvenile-�elated programs; and $1,000 be
allotted to cover the County's administrative fee.
Ms. Dacy stated it is requested that the Council reallocate the
1991 and 1992 funds totaling $78,730.43 to the housing
rehabilitation program. She stated that with the 1993 allocation
of $98,800 and the reallocation of the 1991 and.1992 funds, a total
of $177,530.43 would be available for the housing rehabilitation
program. She stated that Community Development Block Grants are
one avenue of providing rehabilitation loans to Fridley homeowners..
Ms. Dacy stated that the juvenile-related program is new, and it
is recommended that $4,000 be allocated for this acti�ity.
Councilman Billings stated that when the public hearing was held
for the distribution of the Community Development Block Grant
funding, the Council did not discuss funding for the juvenile-
related program. He questioned if it was appropriate to add this
as a line item after the public hearing had been held.
Ms. Dacy stated that because more funds will be received than
anticipated, it does not negate the public hearing, as it is really
not known the exact amount the City will receive until we are well
into the process.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the recommendation to allocate
$4,000 to the juvenile-related program is a staff recommendation,
and it did not come from the Human Resources Commission.
Councilman Schneider stated that it seems the funds should be
allocated betwee'n the two programs originally proposed.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the j�uvenile-related program would
be an after school program�i� F�,idley's middle school.
Mr. Burns stated that it would be after school activities for
students that reside in Fridley, but transportation would not be
provided.
FRIDLTsY CITY COiJNCIL MEETING 4bF FEBROARY 22 1993 PAGB 3
Councilwoman Jorgenson suggested possibly,a drop-in program at the
playgrounds and that it not be just limited to Fridley's middle
school.
Mr. Burns stated that the location for these activities may be
something the Council would want to explore; however, in light of
the number of juvenile problems, it seemed appropriate to consider
this program as a potential use of the additional funds.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that Community Development Block
Grants are usually used for low income residents or blighted areas.
5he questioned using this fund.ing�-�for.juv.enile-related programs.
Mr. Burns stated that staff was only trying to be helpful in
recommending this program, but Gouncil may,wish to use th�se funds
in another manner. That is their choice.
Councilman Billings stated he wished to clarify that if the Council
wished to make any changes in their allocation of these funds a
public hearing would be necessary, which could be done at some
future date.
Councilmarr Schneider stated that the housing rehabilitation program
was given top priority, and the additional Community Development
Block Grants fit this criteria.
Mayor Nee stated that it seems the Council should have the
authority to add or subtract from the items presented at the public
hearing.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that he did not feel what was
presented at the public hearing is binding on the Council and, from
a legal standpoint, there is flexibility to change. He stated that
from a policy standpoint, this is a decision of the Council.
Mr. Steve Klein, Planning Director for the Anoka County Community
Action Program (ACCAP), stated that their organization would be
working closely with the City on the housing rehabilitation
program. He stated th�t he serves on a committee for the battered
women's shelter, and he felt this was also a priority.
Ms. Pat Prinzeralle, Executive Director of Alexandra House, stated
that she did not know the Council conducted a public hearing on the
allocation of the Community Development Block Grants or else she
would have attended. She stated she is here this evening to
request tha�` the Cc�uncit �=co���d�r allocation of these funds for
construction of a shelter for battered women which will accommodate
thirty women and their children. She stated that Alexandra House
has served over one thousand persons in Fridley.
FRIDL$Y CITY COIINCIL M$ETING OF FEBRQARY 22. 1993 PAGE 4
Ms. Prinzeralle stated that their current facility does not
accommodate their needs. She stated that Alexandra House provides
community advocacy services, and it is the only shelter for
battered women in Anoka County. She requested $30,000 from the
City and asked the Council to give this consideration.
Mayor Nee asked if the one thousand persons Alexandra House served
was the total for last year.
Ms. Prinzeralle stated that last year shelter services were
provided to 699 women and children, and the 1,000 persons for
Fridley covers both shelter and advocacy services. She stated that
over 45 percent receiving shelter were�Anoka County residents, and
over 85 percent receiving advocacy serrfices were from Anoka County.
CounciZman Schneider asked what the community advocacy services
provide.
Ms. Prinzeralle stated that this service helps with the filing of
protection orders, assistance with parenting, housing, and
education regarding domestic and dating violence.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is a community advocacy
program at Unity Hospital.
Ms. Prinzeralle stated that they are requesting human services
funds for the hospital advocacy program at Unity Hospital, and:the
one thousand people from Fridley they have served does include that
program.
Mr. Burns stated that City staff did not receive this request until
late Friday afternoon and has not had the opportunity to review it.
Councilman Billings stated that if it were not for the fact that
the City was notified that additional funding would be available,
the Council would have already acted to allocate this funding. He
stated that Alexandra House is a worthwhile program, but he has a
problem with an organization coming to the Council at this late
hour when a decision has to be made this evening on the funding.
He stated that he received a facsimile at 7:25 p.m..this evening
from an Anol�a County Commissioner requesting the Council consider
this organization for funding. He stated that he felt it was
inappropriate to consider spending $30,000 of this funding on an
issue that has now just come before the Council and on which action
must be taken this evening. �
MOTION by Counci�man S'�hneider'`"°"�b���tiallocate the 1993 Community
Development Block Grant funds as follows: $102,800 for the housing
rehabilitation program; $30,600 for human services; and $1,000 for
the County's administrative fee. Seconded by Councilwoman
Jorgenson.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MSETING OF FBBRIIAR�:22. 1993 - PAG� 5
Councilman Schneider stated that he agrees with Councilman
Billings' statement regarding Alexandra House, and this motion is
not a vote against their program.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the Council could determine if
there are any funds available within the budget to allow the City
to contribute to Alexandra House.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with staff's
recommendation and reallocate the 1991:.. and 1992 Community
Development Block Grant funds in the amount of $78,730.43 to the
housing rehabilitation program. Seconded by Councilman Billings.
Upon a voice vote, aIl voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
2. ORDINANCE NO 1007 RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE,
CHAPTER 3 ENTITLED "PERSONNEL" BY AMENDING SECTION 3.09:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager, stated that this is.the
second reading of a proposed amendment to the Personnel Ordinance
which would enable the Police Department to process criminal record
checks. He stated that these checks would be made only after the
person who is the subject of the check had signed a vo�untary
permission slip. He stated that the checks would be done primarily
for the purpose of� checking the backgrounds of prospective
employees. He stated that this would usually take about`two weeks
to accomplish; however, with the amendment of this ordinance, the
City would be able to complete these background checks within a
matter of minutes.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the second reading of
Ordinance No. 1007 and adopt it on the second reading and order
publication. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS•
3. RESOLUTION NO. 18-1993 AUTHORIZING SIGNING AN AGREEMENT FOR
CERTAIN EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED BY INTERNATIONAL UNION OF
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO 49 AFL-CIO (PUBLIC WORKS
MAINTENANCE) FOR 1993:
Mr. Hunt, Assistant to the City'-Manager;�°�s��ted that this agreement
has been negotiated with the International Union of Operating
Engineers, Local No. 49, and includes a three percent increase in
wages; an increase of $20.00 per month in the maximum contribution
of the City towards health, life and dental insurance for employees
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF FEBRIIARY 22, 1993�`��'�-.- � PAG$ 6
choosing family coverage and a maximum contribution of $205.00 per
month for employees choosing.single coverage; a slight change in
language to accommodate the previous two changes; and the addition
of a paragraph to clarify the existing gractice of paying employees
at the rate of time and one-half for hours worked on City
designated holidays.
Mr. Hunt stated that remaining in effect are the resolution and
memorandum of understanding relating to the flexible benefit plan
and an employee separation benefit plan.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 18-1993.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. _
Councilwoman Jorgenson thanked Mr. Hunt for negotiating a good
contract for the City and for holding to a three percent salary
increase which was very critical for the City. She stated that she
appreciated his efforts.
Mr. Hunt stated that the City is privileged to have very good union
representatives, and he has enjoyed the negotiations with the
Public Works Maintenance representatives.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
4. RESOLUTION NO 19-1993 RE4UESTING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION TO REVIEW THE REQUEST OF CERTAIN PERSONS DOING
BUSINESS IN FRIDLEY AND CERTAIN RESIDENTS OF FRIDLEY TO REMOVE
THE FENCE ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 47
�UNIVERSITY AVENUE) FROM 57TH AVENUE TO MTSSISSIPPI STREET:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that the Council received a letter
in October from the Chamber of Commerce requesting that the fence
on the east side of University Avenue be removed. He stated that
a survey was conducted, and the maj ority indicated that they wanted
the fence removed. He stated that in looking at just the
residential population, there was about an even split on those that
wanted the fence removed and those that wanted it to remain.
Mr. Burns stated that this resolution was prepared for submission
to the Department of Transportation requesting them to review the
issue and determine whether or not this fence should be removed.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 1,9-1993.
Seconded by Councilman Billings.
Ms. Loretta Larson, 5980 4th Street, submitted a petition for the
fence to remain. She stated the residents felt that if the fence
was removed, children and �1�f�als could run out onto a busy
highway.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF FEBRIIARY 22. 199.�� PAGE 7
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive Petition No. 3-1993.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, May�r Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Janice Golden, busi.ness owner in Moon Plaza, stated that the
fence greatly affects their business and, with the snow piled
around it, reduces the v�isibility of the business. She stated that
businesses along Univer>>ity Avenue are having trouble remaining in
business. She felt th<it 'the fence was an eyesore and a blight.
She stated that she did not want to see animals killed or children
on the highway; however, the children climb over the fence now, and
it is not a deterrent for anyone who wants to cross University
Avenue. She requested that the Council consider the petition for
removal of the fence submitted by businesses along University
Aqenue.
Mr. Tim Keenan, Manager of the Moon Plaza Shopping Center, stated
that the center has losi� prospective tenants because of the fence.
He stated that in order to see the signs for the center, you have
to look through the fer.ice. He stated that the fence is not well
maintained, is unsightly, and needs repair.
Councilwoman Jorgenson :�tated that the ience is not the City's, but.
it is the property of the State.
Mr. Keenan felt that tlle City has to explore the possibility of
removing the fence.
Mayor Nee said the State:has responded that the fence removal could
become a hazard for pedestrians in the area. He stated that he
felt the Highway Department has been clear that removal of the
fence would generate a hazard for the residents of Fridley.
However, he stated he �rould agree that the fence does need to be
repaired.
Councilman Billings stated the issue is that the Fridley Chamber
of Commerce requested the Council to take an action for which the
Council� does not have any authority, as the fence is not City
property. He stated that thi�s resolution responds to the Chamber
of Commerce's request, and it will be forwarded to the Department
of Transportation for a decision on the fence.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to amend Resolution No. 19-1993
by adding the following language in the third paragraph "a petition
was received from 100 rE:sidents requesting that the fence remain."
Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
Councilman Schneider ��tated t�iat ths�_ resp��cs:��;-requests the
Department of Transportation to make a determination if it is
appropriate to leave ti:�e fence given all the competing factions.
He presumes they would proceed and probably all information
pertaining to the City's survey should be deleted.
°-=FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL M$BTINQ OF FEBRIIARY 22. 1993 PAGB 8°
UPON A ROLL CALL VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE AMENDMENT, Councilwoman
Jorgenson, Mayor Nee, Councilman Fitzpatrick, and Councilman •
Billings voted in favor of the motion. Councilman Schneider voted
against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to amend Resolution No. 19-1993 by
deleting the entire third paragraph which references the City's
survey and the petition requesting the fence remain. Seconded by
Councilman Billings. Upon a roll call vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the mdtion carried unanimously.
Mr. Jim Golden, business owner in Moon Plaza, stated that it is
clear in his mind that there is no need for the fence on the east
side of University Avenue. He stated that there woul:d be very few
young people that would cross University Avenue, and the fence
would still be in place on the west side so a person could not go
all the way across. He stated that Highway 65 has no fence. He
stated that the speed limit is higher, and there is residential
housing on that highway.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that speaking as a property
owner who owns a commercial building on the east side of University
Avenue, whether the fence is removed or not, it seems this area has
deteriorated. He stated that some time ago there was a committee
of business people that with the City and the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority discussed improving the appearance along
University Avenue with decorative lighting and landscaping. �He
stated that when one drives down University Avenue now, it is a
sorry sight. He stated that if t�ie fence is removed or remains,
it seems the appearance should be improved for this area. He
stated that part of the problem for the businesses that have not
succeeded has been either a problem with access or at least a
perception of a problem of access.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is a housing proposal
which would practically be adjacent to the fence.
Mr. Herrick stated that if this proposal materializes and there is
a residential area, perhaps a fence is more appropriate. He stated
that the area between 61st Avenue and Mississippi Street is well
established as a commercial area.
Ms. Barbara Warren, Executive Director of the Fridley Chamber of
Commerce, stated that their members are very concerned about the
condition of the fence and the City's image for this area of
University Avenue. She stated that the fence is basically why
„�"��'' h�isinesses have not continued to look at property sou�l� of 6�st -
Avenue. She stated that when the Council reviews petitions from
the business community and those from the residents, you have to
look at percentages.
�` , �
�.
FRIDL$Y CTTY COIINCIL ME�ETING OF FBBRIIARY 2�:1993 PAGE 9
Mr. Scott Board, Roway :Productions, 6239 University Avenue, stated
that if the Departm�:�� c�� Tran�p�rtation will not remove the fence,
he believed the City :�hould make some changes along University
Avenue to acco�nodate the businesses. He stated that with the
fence and snow build u�� in the winter and weeds in the summer, it
reduces the businesses' visibility. He stated that there is a
fence behind the busin�esses at Moon Plaza which should act as a
deterrent.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the Housing and Redevelopinent
Authority has been maintaining the area along University Avenue in
order to assist the businesses.
Mr. Rich Cermak, 5917 ��th Street, asked if th8� letter Councilman
Billings sent to the Department of Transportation was on official
stationary.
Councilman Billings stated that it was typed by a City employee on
the City's official st:ationary and signed by him. The letter
requested the Departmen.t of Transportation to review the issue of
the fence on University Avenue �nd to hold whatever public hearings
were necessary to dete�rmine if the fence should remain or be
removed.
Mr. Cermak stated that apparently there were persons who signed a
petition who are not homeowners. He stated that he agrees with the
businessmen in Moon Pl��za, but there are two different areas on
University Avenue to consider -- the residential area up to 61st
Avenue and the Moon Pla�;a area. He stated that the problem in this
area is not due to the fence, but that a lot.of businesses could
not survive because there is no access from University Avenue.
Mayor Nee stated that he is opposed to removing the fence, but he
thinks the amendment to the resolution makes the resolution
neutral.. He stated ithat the resolution simply requests the
Department of Transportation to review the fence issue.
UPON A ROLL CALL VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION TO ADOPT THIS
� RESOLUTION, Councilman F'itzpatrick, Councilman Billings, Mayor Nee,
Councilman Schneider anci Councilwoman Jorgenson all voted in favor
of the motion, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
5. RECEIVE THE MINU�TES OF THE CABLE TELEVISION ADVISORY
COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 28, 1993:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick. -�_�o : r.�.,�i�te��he _minutes of the
Cable Television Advisory Commission Meeting of January 28, 1993.
Seconded by Councilman biilings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MELTING OF FEBRIIARY 22. 1993 PA6�-10
6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 10. 1993:
A. ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 15. 1993 FOR A VACATION
RE4UEST SAV #92-03 BY BOB'S PRODUCE RANCH GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 7620 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the public hearing on
Vacation Request, SAV #92-03 for March 15, 1993. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
7.
1977 TO REMAIN IN EFFECT WHEN THE FACE OF THE SIGN IS
REPLACED OR REMODELED, TO ALLOW THE_ REMODELING OF THE EXISTING
SIGN GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5351 CENTRAL AVENUE:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that in 1974, the
Council granted, a variance up to 180 square feet for a Menards sign
and message center. She stated that the Menards sign is 158.25
square feet, and the message center is 57 square feet for a total
of 215.25 square feet. She stated that it is not clear why the
total square footage is over 180 square feet, but in any case, the
variance was granted prior to November, 1977. She stated that the
sign ordinance states on any variance granted before that date, if
the sign is changed or remodeled, it has to comply with the current
code requirements which is 80 square feet.
Ms. Dacy stated that when this request was submitted to the Appeals
Commission, it was proposed that there be a 132 square feet sign
and no change in the message center. She stated that the Appeals
Commission unanimously recommended denial. She stated that Menards
has since reduced the size of the sign, and the request before the
Council is for a 119 square foot Menards sign and a 57 square foot
message center for a total of 176 square feet.
Mr. Scott Egerer, of Jones Sign, representing Menards, stated that
they wished to update the Menards sign. He stated that he did not
know who put up the existing sign, and he learned of the
discrepancy in size several weeks ago. He stated that they have
found some old records at Menards, and the exact size of the
message center is 3 feet by 19 feet. He believes the sign that now
exists is 123.50 square feet. He stated that the new sign would
be 176 square feet which includes the message center.
Mr. Egerer stated that the reason they canri�t mee�=�the 8O���a�e
foot requirement for a sign is that the message center is 57 square
feet, and it would only leave a 23 square foot sign. He stated
that Embers and Ground Round have variances for 120 square foot
signs, and even if they went to a 120 square foot sign, this would
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MIEETING OF FEBRIIARY 22. ° 1993 �:r �' -`�'�AGL 11
only leave 63 square fe:et for an identification sign, as 57 square
feet would be for the message center. He felt that a 63 square
foot sign woul.d be too small.
Mr. Egerer submitted a list of other Menards identification signs
which ranged from 468 to 114.37 square feet. He stated that the
smallest sign of 114.37' is the only sign Menards has anywhere that
is smaller than the onE� they are proposing.
Mr. Egerer stated that Menards did not wish to lose the message
center, as it is very E:ffective advertising.
Councilman Billings si:ated that he was prepared to support a
variance for 180 squar�� feet, as it was the variance �Ienards had
since 1974.
Councilman Schneider st:ated that the City is trying to reduce the
size of signs in this <3rea, and it has been done at Ground Round
and Embers.
CounciZwoman Jorqenson stated that there are very few peop�e in
this area that do not k:now where Menards is located.
Mr. Egerer stated _that t:he identification sign is the only one ti�at
is visible from I-694. He stated that the sign they are proposing
would be 176.25 square feet including the message center.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to grant Variance Request,
VAR #92-28, for Menards at 5351 Central Avenue to vary the size of
a s�gn, from the code requirement of 80 square feet to a sign not
to exceed 180 square fe��t with the following stipulations: (1) The
sign shall remain in ef`fect until (a) the sign is altered in any
way, except for routine maintenance and change of inessages, which
makes the sign less in c;ompliance with the requirements of Chapter
214 than it was before the alterations; (b) the supporting
structure of the sign i�; replaced or remodeled; (c) the face of the
sign is replaced or remodeled; (d) the sign becomes dilapidated or
damaged and the cost of` bringing it into compliance is more than
fifty (50�) percent of the value of said sign, at which time all
of the sign and its str�ucture be removed; and (e) notwithstanding
subparagraph (a) above, upon the change of the name of the business
being displayed on this sign. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant Variance Request,
VAR-#92-28, for a total sign of 120 square feet with the following
stipulations: (1) The sign shall remain in eFfect until (a) the
sign is altered in any way, excep�-�=.for r�tin�=xm�i��ance and
change of inessages, which makes the sign less in compliance with
the requirements of Chapter 214 than it was before the alterations;
(b) the supporting struc:ture of the sign is replaced or remodeled;
(cj the face of the sic{n is replaced or remodeled,t (dj the sign
F`RIDLLY CITY COONCIL MEETING OF FEBRIIARY 22. 1993� <"`'PAGE"-I2
becomes dilapidated or damaged and the cost of bringing it into
compliance is more than fifty (50�) percent of the value of said
sign, at which time all of the sign and its structure be removed;
ahd (e) notwithstanding subparagraph (a) above, upon the change of
the name of the business being displayed on this sign. Seconded
by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, Councilman
Schneider, Councilwoman Jorgenson, and Mayor Nee voted in favor of
the motion. Councilman Billings and Councilman Fitzpatrick voted
against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 3
to 2 vote.
8. APPROVAL OF 1993 HOME PI20GRAM APPLICATION:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that the Ca�nty
has access to approximately $310,000 of 1993 HOME funds, and about
$210,000 of these funds are available to communities in Anoka
County. She stated that the HOME program requires a local match
of twenty percent of the HOME allocation. She stated it is
recommended that Fridley request $70,000; therefore, the City o.r
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority would be responsible for
up to $14,000. She stated that the County is suggesting the HOME
funds be coupled with an NIIiFA fix-up program and submit the MHFA
loan amount as the local match. She stated that the Federal
government is clear that CDBG funds cannot.be used as the local
match for a HOME rehabilitation project.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Department of Housing and Urban
Development does not give communities a substantial amount of time
to complete these applications, and they have to be submitted to
the County by February 26, 1993.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that the County has access to
$310,000, but only $210,000 is available to the cities, and she
wondered where the other $100,000 was to be used.
Ms. Dacy stated that she believed the County is allocating the
$100,000 to a project in Anoka.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she would like to know on what
project this $100,000 would be used.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the submission of the
1993 HOME program application. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Ne� declared the motion
carried unanimously.
9. ESTABLISH PUBLIC HEARING FOR A REQ�`7�ST T(T�"�RAN�'"`���ENCY
EXCHANGE LICENSE TO INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY EXCHANGE, INC.,
GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7893 EAST RIVER ROAD:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to set the public hearing on this
request for a currency exchange license for March 15, 1993.
FRIDLEY CE�Y"l' �OiT1�CIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22 , 1993 PAG$ 13
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
10. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR WELL REPAIR PROJECT
NO. 241:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive the following bids for
Well Repair Project No. 241:
Planholder
Mark Traut .Wel'�s �
151 72nd Avenue
St. Cloud, MN 56301
Bergerson Caswell
5115 Industrial
Maple Plain, MN 553�9
E.H. Renner & Sons•
15688 Jarvis Street
Elk River, MN 55330
Well No. 2
$25,155.00
$27,003.00
$�7,941.50
Layne Minnesota $29,492.00
3147 California
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Keys Well Drilling $33,959.00
413 N. Lexington Parkway
St. Paul, MN 55104
Total Bid
Well No. 6
$15,157.00
$18,658.00
$17,424.00
$16,785.00
$19,416.00
Well No 7
$12,770.00
$15,333.00
$13,962.00
$13,580.00
$18,629.00
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that Mark Traut Wells was
the low bidder on the repair and maintenance for all three of these
wells, Nos. 2, 6 and 7, and it is recommended the contract be award
to them.
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to award the contract to the low
bidder, Mark Traut Wells, for the repair and maintenance of Well
No. 2 in the amount of $25,155.00; for Well No. 6 in the amount of
$15,157.00; and for Well No. 7 in the amount of $12,770.00 for a
total bid of $53,082.00 for Project No. 241. Seconded by
'�e�uncii�-rSc�2ieider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee .,_r
declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEETING �F"FEBRIIARY 22. 1993 PAGB 14
11. APPROVE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND MAIER
STEWART & ASSOCIATES INC FOR LOCKE PARK FILTER PLANT
REFURBISHING, PROJECT NO. 240:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated it is recommended that the
City retain the services of Maier Stewart & Associates for the
design and engineering for the Locke Park Filter Plant
Refurbishing, Project No. 240, at a cost not to�exceed $77,500.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the contract between
the City and Maier Stewart & Associates, Inc. for the Locke Park
Filter Plant Refurbishing, Project No. 240, at a cost not to exceed
$77,500. Seconded by Councilman Sahneider. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared ti�e motion carried unanimously.
12. RESOLUTION NO. 20-1993 AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ADVERTISING FOR BIDS FOR THE 52ND
AVENUE FLOODWAY AND CLOVER POND DIVERSION PROJECT:
Mr. Flora, Public Work Director, stated that the
has been working with the City of Columbia Heights
no. 222 regarding drainage problems. He stated
powers agreement requires both cities to approve
for bids and awarding the contract.
City of Fridley
on this project
that the joint
the advertising
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, questioned if it was the intent that
a contract would not be awarded unless both City Councils approve,
and if so, he would suggest substituting the word "may" rather than
"sha11" in the last paragraph of the resolution. He stated that
the contract would not be awarded until both Councils have approved
the bid.
Mr. Flora stated that this was the intent of the resolution.
MOTIaN by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 20-1993.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to amend Resolution No. 20-1993 by
substituting the word "may" instead of "shall" in the last
paragraph of the resolution. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to further amend Resolution
No. 20-1993 by adding the following paragraph at the end of the
resolution to read as Fo1l�ows: ..BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, the
contract wilT `"not b�''award�d `�t`ri�`�#1 both Councils have approved the
bid. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
%'RIDLLY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF FLBRIIARY 22, 1993 �`PAQE'15
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION FOR ADOPTION OF
RESOLUTION NO. 20-1993, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
13. RESOLUTION NO. 21-1993 REVOKING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS:
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 21-1993.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
14. RESOLUTION NO. 22-1993 ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID
STREETS• .
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 22-�993.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, ail voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
15. RESOLUTION NO. 23-1993 REOUESTING VARIANCES FROM THE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RULES FOR STATE AID OPERATIONS .
TO ALLOW: (1) A STREET IMPROVEMENT WITH 50 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY
WIDTH AND {2) STREET IMPROVEMENTS WITH VARIANCES FROM VERTICAL
AND HORIZONTAL CURVE STANDARDS: �
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that with the 1993 street
reconstruction program, certain streets do not meet certain
Minnesota State Aid requirements. Therefore, variances are being
requested on Benjamin Street, Fillmore Street, and Cheri Lane.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 23-1993.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider.. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
16. RESOLUTION NO. 24-1993'AUTHORIZING THE APPLICATION FOR A
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION INFILTRATION/IN-FLOW
GRANT•
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated th�
Waste Control Commission is initiating a
infiltration/in-flow projects. He stated
proposing to Insituform line a portion of its
metal sanitary sewer-collector line and could
grant for.this project. He requested the Counc
application for this grant.
t the Metropolitan
program regarding
that the City is
15 inch corrugated
�e considered for a
il to authorize the
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 24-1993
and identify JoYin G. Flora, Director of Public Works, ;�s the
contact person for this grant. Seconded b� Counc�lman F�i�rick.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY C,laUNCII, . MEETING OF_ FEBRIIARY 22 . 1993 PAGE 16
17. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there were no informal status
reports.
18. CLAIMS•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claim Nos.
47743 through 48062.. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
19. LICENSES:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted
and �s on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
20. ESTIMATES•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to approve the estimates as
submitted:
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
400 Northtown Financial Plaza
200 Coon Rapids Boulevard
Coon Rapids, NIN 55433
Statement for Services Rendered
as City Attorney for the Month
of January, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,116. 28
Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered.
301 Fridley Plaza Office Building
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Statement for Services Rendered
as City Prosecuting Attorney for
the Month of January, 1993 . . . . . . . . . $12,791.25
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Billings that the City Council of the City of
_�� Fridl�ey doe��.�th�s:,= 22nd day of February, 1993 wish City Council
Secretary, Carole Haddad, a very happy birthday and many more to
follow. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded
by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular
Meeting of the Fridley City.Council of February 22, 1993 adjourned
at 9:46 p.m,
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council
Mayor
Approved:
MEMORANDUM
_ Municipal Center
_ 6431 University Avenue Northeast Willialri C. Hunt
Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Assiscanc co che City Manager
�.�0� (612) 572-3507
FRtDLEY FAX: (612) 571-1287
�,
MEMO TO: WILLIAM A. BIIRNS, CITY MANAGER ���
FROM: WILLIAM C. HUNT, A38ISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER `��/�
STAFF PERSON TO CHARTER COMMISSION
SIIBJECT: REQIIEST OF CHARTER COMMISSION TO WITHDRAW AMl3NDMENTS TO
CHAPTER 2 AND SECTION 4.04 FROM FIIRTHER CONBIDERATION BY
THE FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL
DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1993
Enclosed is a.letter from Gordon Backlund, Chairman of the Fridley
Charter Commission, communicating the vote of the �Charter
Commission to withdraw the proposed amendments to Chapter 2 and
Section 4.04 of the Fridley City Charter from further consideration
by the Fridley City Council.
I request that you present this matter to the City Council for
action at their meeting of March 1, 1993. �
�
_
C�� �F
FRiDLEY
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 57 t-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287
;'
February 25, 1993
The Honorable William J. Nee
Mayor
City of Fridley .
6431 University Avenue, N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Mayor Nee:
.
On Febrtzary 22, Z993, the Fridley Charter Commission .met to
consider a number of issues raised by the Fridley City Council
regarding proposed amendments to Chapter 2 and Section 4.04 of the
City Charter. We also reviewed the enclosed letter from the
Charter Commission's lawyer, Mr. John W. Terpstra.
After due consideration the Charter Commission voted to withdraw
the proposed amendments from further consideration by the City
Council.
Sincerely,
1
Gordon Backlund, Chairman
Fridley Charter Commission
GB/wch/jb
Cc: �William W. Burns, City Manager
John W. Terpstra, Attorney at Law
William C. Hunt, Staff Person to the Charter Commission
1A
FEg 18 i993
TERPSTRA, BLACK, BRANDELL, KAMINSKY & HOFF'MAN
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JOHN W. TERPSTRA 9�3J�AAIN STREET KIM E. BRANDE�L
RONALO G. BLACK ElK RIVER, MINNESOTA 55330 WALTER M. KAMINSKY
(612) 441-7040 JOHN C. HOFFMAN
February 16, 1993
Mr. Wi 11 i am C. Hunt
Assistant to the Fridley City Manager
Fridley Municipal Center
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Mr. Hunt:
I am in receipt of your f ebruary 5, 1993 correspondence. I understand that the
Charter Commission wants to know if it can amend the Charter to provide that
short term City Council vacancies be filled by only appointees who would not a�
the scheduled general election, run for the office for which he or she had been
appointed. Due to constitutional and statutory mandates, the Charter should not
be amended to restrict short term appointees from seeking elective office to.the
position for which they have been appointed.
Minnesota Statute §211B.10 provides that a person may not reward or promise to
reward another in a� manner to induce the person to be or ref rain from or cease
f rom being a candidate. The Statute further provides that a pe rson may not
solicit or receive a payment, promise or reward from another for the assurance
that the person will not seek elective office. _
The Statute Section referred to above is consistent with the State and Federal
Constitutions. The right to run for political office is a federal
Constitutional Right. This legal maxim was spoken by a Minnesota Federal Court
in the case of Johnson v. Kushing. The Minnesota Constitution provides that
every person who is entitled to vote is eiigible for a� office eaective by the
people in the district in which the person has resided �hirty days previous to
the election except as otherwise provided by the Minnesota Constitution or the
Constitution of the United States. (As provided by the Minnesota Constitution,
Article 7, Section 6)
Appellate Courts have reviewed the actions of governing bodies which restrict a
person's right to seek elective office with a scant eye. I did not read a case
where the Appellate Court found the restriction constitutional. The courts have
with regularity, said that restrictions to the right to seek elective office �
will meet constitutional muster only when it serves a compeling interest and
acts in the least drastic way to accomplish that purpose (i.e. Minnesota Fifth
Congressional District Independent Republican Party v. State 295NW2d650.
.
0
�
Page 2
February 16, 1993
Mr. William C. Nunt
Although the Charter Amendment under consideration seeks to accomplish a poten-
tially benevolent goal, if challenged, I believe it would not pass the rigid
constitutional test. Is the desire to avoid creating an unfair advantage of
incumbancy a compelling interest? Is there no other way to avoid creating an
unfair advantage to the temporary appointee? A reviewing cou�t, with a bias in
favor of the right to seek elective office and promote the free expression of
politics, would most likely answer the questions negatively and therefore deter-
mine the Charter Amendment to be unconstitutional.
Rather than risk a constitutional challenge which may result in a costly defeat
for the Commission, I would suggest that other options be considered.
Sincerely,
TERPSTRA, BLACK, BRANDELL, �
KAMINSKY & HOFFMAN
By : , � G� � �.,.-�--.,
n W. Terp"stra
JWT/kmh
�o��s,.,. �, �
1C
ORDINANCE NO. ��'
AN ORDINANCL AMENDING CHAPTER 2 AND SECTION 4.04
OF�THE FRIDLEY CITY CHARTER
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
That the following sections of the Fridley City Charter be amended
as follows:
CHAPTER 2
. . . ., . .. .
CITY COUNCIL ORGANIZATION
Section 2.01 COUNCIL-MANAGER PLAN.IMPLEMENTATION
l. The form of government established by this Charter shall be
known as the "Council-Manager Plan.—" pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes.
COMMENT: CLARIFIES THE SOORCE OF.THE ��COIINCIL-MANAGER PLAN.��
2. Al1 discretionary powers of the City, both legislative and
executive, shall vest in and be exercised by the City Council.
It shall have complete contral over the City administration,
but shall exercise this control exclusively,through the City
Manager and shall not itself attempt to perform any
administrative �l� duties.
3. The Council shall �se�€-��, �~a �'��'' perform �the duties and
exercise the powers of all �a� Citv boards and commissions
except as n�n otherwise provided bv statute or by this
charter. It may�ze��oFe� � by ordinance ereate commissions
with advisory powers to investigate any subject of interest
to the municipality.
4. The Council shall have power to make investigations into the
City's affairs, to subpoena witnesses,.administer oaths, and
compel the production of books, papers and other
evidence. The Council may at any time provide for an
examination or audit of the accounts of any office or
department of the City government, or it may cause to be made
any survey or research study of any problem affecting the City
or its inhabitants. Each such investigation shall be
authorized by resolution of th� =Counc�. tr. �:-�.:='��`
COMMENT: MOVED FROM PRESENT SECTION 2.08.01. ERPANDS THE ABILITY
OF THE COIINCIL TO REQIIIRE PRODIICTION OF NONDOCITMENTARY
EVIDENCE.
Ll_�J
.-�••� -5. Any member of the Council may request in writing any specific .,�� _
` information relating ta any department via the City Manager.
The City Manager shall respond in writing within a reasonable
period of time. (Ref. Ord. 592)
COMMENT: MOVED FROM PRESENT SECTION 2.08.02.
6. Except for the purpose of inquiry, the Council and its members
shall deal with and control the administrative services solely
through the City Manager, and neither the Council nor any.
member thereof shall give orders�to any of the subordinates
of the City Manager, either p�blicly or privately. •
COMMENT: MOVED FROM PRESENT SECTION 2.09
Section 2.8�02. ELECTIVE OFFICERS
1. The Council shall be composed of a Mayor and four (4)
Councilmembers who shall be eligible voters.
2. The Mayor shall be elected at large €� in each United States
presidential election year to. a��?� e��ee _�?��__;
e��c e�--�e-#e-��ee�e���T9'� -�p�€e�-a
�A��cui�t�r�f�^"'cr� --zzi�E—�3�9�6i1--E�GG1��--�e �.u... ..rc • c
term of four (4) years.
�-3.. One (1): Councilmember shall be el°ected at large in each United
States presidential election year to
' Ll.. � ...L ... �L L 1 l L. �. v 1SD7 CTiZ- .CTTTTI � 1
....�. e�-s��e-t�-i- e�ee�ee'�--' �-�.-�t�i �,.a
, . � �,��e F � ... �..,.. - ... .i :.. i.. .. � � 7.+ C�GGIT.9Z'Q'e'����r4'C
�ee�e�-€e� a term of.four (4) years.
�4 . Three ( 3) Councilmembers shal l be elected To--� - ��==�s�T-t�r�
in each Minnesota aubernatorial election year
,from three (3) separate Wards of The City,
� s.. .. � i i.. � r. a wr �
�9�f3hfi � �`�9-�—�rra�zrre--��9� �G}iii��2frE3t�3E�—�A�t'�l�r--i�l9�
i
3J9-5��=��r��e�^�^a �~�e�n-ita-�ds-�te�-a�e�-P�e-��'�e
. .
�
�re�-�e-�r��s-e�ee�e1�E�--e�ee�e€-�e�re�nte�e=-re��-i+.� a�
E���e�e�€e=�:�i�-3 s'���-'�e-e-�e��ee�-�e�-a-te-�tt to terms
��.�ry ��.�=�r of four ( 4 ) years each, . . . . . . ,�.�:,
_`.__ j' c9ii'iR'�i,'ii��i�ia�-��r•� �hr�—rnxscnn cl orsi��a �� LLv v"' vV .
. 6i�9iiii@-i�iR��—�°,,. �n��.a " 9�...�zr�r'r'r-�@—�'r2��"��--`r'vi -t���laii!—v°r
.1E �
COMMENTB: SECTIONS �.03�'�#"AND-2.03.05 MOVED TO NEW SECTION 2..04.
tr.-5. The term of Mayor and of each Councilmember shall begin on the
first e€€��za��si-�� day "�� -L'- of January following
their election to office and shall end on December 31 of the
last vear of the term. The incumbent may remain in office
until �e�c a successor has been duly e�e��e --a '��� qualified
and accepts the office. The first order of business at the
first official Council meeting in each January that follows
an election year shall be the swearing in of the newly elected
members of the Council.
COMMENT: CHANGES THE TIMES WHEN TERMS BEGIN AND END.
6. The Council shall be the judge of the election of its members.
COMMENT: SECTIONS 2.03._07 �TD 2.03.08 MOVED TO NEW SECTION 2.04.
SECTION 2.04 MOVED TO NEW SECTION 2.05.
SECTION 2.05 MOVED TO NEW SECTION 2.06.
Section 2.8603 THE MAYOR •
1. The Mayor shall be the presiding officer of the Council,
except that , a. mavor pro tem shall. be chosen from the
remaining Councilmembers to `-�'a -°�'-� serve at the pleasure
of the eouncil, who shall act as Mayor in case of the Mayor's
temporary disability or absence from the City.
COMMENT: CORRECTS THE TITLE OF THE MAYOR PRO TEM AND SPECIFIES
THAT THE APPOINTMENT IS ONLY FOR THE TEMPORARY ABSENCE
OR DISABILITY OF THE MAYOR.
2. The Niayor shall vote as a member of the Council.
3. The Mayor shall exercise a11 powers and perform all duties
conferred and imposed hy this Charter, the ordinances of the
City and the laws of the State.
4. The Mayor shall be recognized as the official head of the City
for all ceremonial purposes, by the courts for the purpose of
serving civil process, and by the Governor for the purposes
of martial law.
COMMENT: THE F.OLLOWING SENTENCE IN 2.06 MOVED TO NEW 2.01.07.
5. At the direction of the Council 31the Mayor shall study the
operations of the City government and shall report to the
Council any neglect, dereliction of duty, or waste on the part
of any.officer or department of the City.
6. In time of public danger or emergency the Mayor may, --"-�- '-`--
�e�l���'�-��s�; take command of the police, maintain order
and enforce the law. Council consent shall be obtained when
practicable.
' 1 F=
COMMENT: REVISED TO ALLOW MAYOR-��O TAICE CONTROL IN TIME OF
EMERGENCY WITHOIIT.FIRST HAVING TO SEER COUNCIL APPROVAL.
Section 2.04 WARD COUNCILMEMBERS
1. The City is divided into three
(3) separate election Wards designated as `�'�T Ward 1,
Ward 2, and Ward 3.
- - - - - •- - - - • -- - - -- ----
� i�t�re�P€e�:
crr9z�t�-�'�e�
COMMENT: REVISED FROM PRE3ENT SECTION 2.03.04
2. 3�e A Ward Councilmember e�-ee-�e� €�e�-a-��-� must be a
resident of such ward. ____ � e--�e--a�e9��� '-'--�--�
�� ��-ea��e--a-�a�a�e�a�e��r-t-�re-e€€��e-e€--���ne��T�e�-��
,
se��g °�•�'- '-�� ��-~~�. If the Ward Councilmember ceases to be
a resident of the ward, then that office shall be declared
vacant. However, a chancte in ward boundaries during the term
of office shaTl not disqualify the Councilmember from
completing the term.
COMMENT: REVISED FROM PRESENT SECTION 2.03.05.
3. The boundaries of the three (3) wards shall be redetermined
from time to time by ordinances duly adopted by the Council
and after each decennial census of the United States, and
based on the findings of the Council that the wards so
redetermined are such that the population of any ward shall
not deviate by more than three percent (3%) from the average
of the three (3) wards.
COMMENT: MOVED FROM PRESENT SECTIQN 2.03.07
4. ,
s'���-re����e-ira�a-�el-���res—�k� The redetermination
of ward boundaries shall be accomplished within the deadlines
established by Minnesota law. If no deadlines are established
bv law, then redistrictinq must be completed no less than one
hundred (100) days prior to the legally determined date of the
municipal primary of the year ending in the digit two (2), and
if the Gouncil shall fail to do so their remuneration shall
be forfeited until the wards of the City are duly redetermined
as required by �his Charter.
1�G
COMMENT: MOVED FROM PRESENT SECTION 2.03.08 -�--�P -�-,-
Section 2.8� 05. DISQUALIFICATION FOR APPOINTIVE OFFICE
No incumbent member of the Council shall be appointed acting or
permanent City Manager, nor shall. any member hold any other paid
municipal office or employment under the City; and ar�-? �±np �'_;
no
former member shall be appointed to any paid office or employment.
under the City until one {1) year aft.er leaving office.
COMMENT: THIS CLARIFIES THE DISQIIALIFICATIONS OF CITY
COIINCILMEMBERS FROM BEING EMPLOYED BY THE CITY.
Section 2.8�06 VACANCIES IN THE COUNCIL
l. A vacancy in the Council shall be deemed to exist in c�se of
the failure of any person elected thereto to qualify oh or
before the date of the second regular meeting of the new
Council, or by reason of the death, resignation, removal from
office, removal from the City, removal of a ward councilmember
from that ward, continuous absence from the City for more than
three (3) months, or conviction of a felony, of any such
person whether before or after their qualification, or by
reason of the failure of any councilmember without good cause
to perform any of the duties of inembership in the Council for
� a period of three (3) months. In each such case, the Council
shall by resolution declare s���a vacancy to exist_ �
s�..., , �..�.�,.... ��. . (Ref . Ord. )
2. If a vacancv is
year of the term of office in question the Council shall ca11
a special election to be held not less than €e?�j=•-���? �s"�
thirty (30� days nor more than sixty (60) days from the time
such vacancy is declared. The Council shall designate a
with 5ection 4.06. (Ref. Ord. )
3. In the case of a special election to fill the vacancy, �e
�� ��-� e--�re��i�ta��e-�-ee�-re�: "'�e-�� rd-a���e��i��rg�e
3-a�e e�-e��e�es s= �'��� e--e�e��e�e-���—the
procedure provided in Section 4.03, Primary Elections, and
Section 4.04, Special Elections, shall be followed except for
the schedulinq of election dates, which must be within the
time frame specified here. The winner of said election shall
be qualified and take office immediately upon certification
by the board of canvass and shall fill the unexpired term.
(Ref. Ord. 857, Ord. )
�
� .
�t�e}rs-at�te�pe r�-ad�el-��re _ .. , _.L... � � � �. �
1H
,�..0 , � . _ .::�.�..: ___�
��63.-i�iR�t'�'-9rs'i£rirA _ �.. � � �. _ �
T � T F �•1. ��R..CI. ��C�'••.•�•�GRZTG—RZ �e'�—'R1Ti'e'�"�GZZ�r���ii� � �'e
s��ei-�ftEi���''.-izi—ti'n@—�9—��3CG--9�....� ;�i,. a.i,.�-9�3viiC�C�
$ . ��—�i@—��@9--i�G3ii�---c'��e--e��3@—S�iit@--��3���—�ie ���'
- • � . � .
4. If the vacancv is declared to occur on or after July 1 but
before October 1 of the fourth year of the term of office in
�uestion, the Council shall appoint (within thirty (30) days
of the vacancy declaration) by majority vote a qualified
citizen who is not a candidate for any municipal office in the
����.- general election in question. The appointee shall assume
office immediate�y and complete the unexpired term (Ref.
Ord. )
5. If the vacancv is declared to occur on or after October l of
the fourth vear of the term, the winner of the general
election shall be qualified and take office immediately If
the winner of the cteneral election cannot take office due to
reasons indicated in Sec.tion 2.06.01 above the Council shall
, declare a vacancy and order a special election as provided for
in Sections 2.06.02 and 2.06.03 above The person so elected
shall serve out any of the remainder of the unexpired term as.
well as the full four year term. (Ref. Ord. )
6. Ii the Mayor's position is declared vacant the Councilmember-
at-Larae shall serve as Mavor until the vacancv is filled
(Ref. Ord. )
7. Ii at anv time.the membership of the Council is reduced to
less than three (3) members, the City Manager shall order a
�ecial election after the manner provided in Sections
2.06.02, and 2.06.03 above to brina the membership of the
council up to five (5). (Ref. Special Election 3/25/75, Ord.
776, Ord. 857, Ord. )
8. If the position of Citv Manaqer is vacant the Citv Clerk
shall order such an election. If the position of City Clerk
is also vacant, the Chief Judge of District Court of the State
of Minnesota within whose jurisdiction the corporate offices
of the City of Fridley lie shall order such an elECtion.
(Ref. Ord. )
Section 2.07 SALARIES AND EXPENSES
The Mayor and each Councilmember shall receive =�_� l-==Y reasonable
remuneration or salary, the annual amount and payment of which
shall be prescribed by ordinance duly adopted on or before November
1st of the year preceding payment of the same. TT...�;, �.w.. ���
11
,
�@Ee-'li,�@�-��i2--��3�@ia'-�i3�-�'`6�tit�iH'�iit�9El°'9 6f a.i.._ t�_� � ...,. �.o L+.,._a� ....
�J� �j �
When authorized by the Council, its meYnbers shall be remunerated
for their reasonable expenses incu"rred in connection with the
City'`s business. The City Manager and all subordinate officers and
employees of the CIty shall receive such reasonable compensation
as may be fixed by the Council.
COMMENT: SECTION 2.08 MOVED TO NEW SECTIONS 2.01.04 AND 2.01.05.
COMMENT: SECTION 2.09 MOVED TO NEW SECTION 2.01.06
CHAPTER 4
NOMIIJAT-IONS AND ELEC.TIONS
Section 4.04 SPECIAL ELECTIONS.
The Council may by resolution order a special election, fix.
the time of holding the same, and provide all means for
holding such special election, provided that three (3) weeks'
published notice shall be given of said special election. The
procedure at such elections shall conform as nearly as
possible to that herein provided for other municipal
elections. Special elections for vacancies in the Citv
Council shall be held in accordance with the provisions of
Section 2.06. (Ref. Ord. )
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1992.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - ACTING CITY CLERK
1J
.
� �
�
.
Community Development Department
PLANIVING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 25, 1993
�/�.
1b
TO: William Burns, City Manager ��
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Second Reading of an Ordinance Approving a
Rezoning Request, ZOA #88-04, by Community
Development Corporation (Westminster)
Attached please find the above-referenced ordinance and staff
report. The ordinance rezones the.property located generally north
of St. William's Church from R-2, Two Family Dwelling and C-3,
General Shopping Center,.to R-3, General Multiple Family Dwe�ling
to permit the construction of a multiple family elderly housing
project. The City Council at its March 20, 1989 meeting held the
first reading of the attached ordinance. Consistent with past
policy, the second reading of the ordinance was held pending
construction of the project. The petitioner has received
preliminary funding commitments from HUD to construct the building.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second and final
reading of the attached ordinance so that construction may begin
in 1993.
MM/dn
M-93-79
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY
OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA BY MAKING A CHANGE IN
ZONING DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1.
SECTION 2.
Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended
as hereinafter indicated.
The tract or area within the County of Anoka and the
City of Fridley and described as:
Lots 1 through 16, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 30, Block
2, Norwood Addition to Fridley Park.
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District
R-3, General Multiple Dwelling.
SECTION 3. -That the Zoning Administrator is directed to change
, the official zoning map to show said tract or area
to be rezoned from Zoned District R-2, Two Family
Dwelling and C-3, General Shopping Center, to R-3,
General Multiple Family Dwelling.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF�THE CZTY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1993.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing:
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
February 13, 1989
March 20, 1989
2A
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
_
�
CITY OF
FRt DLEY
,3
�,
REQUEST
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATtON
SITE DATA
SIZE
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
8� ZONtNG
�$
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL 1MPLICATIONS
STAFF REPQRT
APPEALS DATE N/A
PLANNING COMMISSlON DATE November 9, 1988
CITY COUNCIL DATE : February 13, 1989 AUTHOR BD/dn
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
�COMPATIBILITY WITH
ADJACENT USES 8� ZONaVG
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
ZOA 4�88-04
Community Development Corporation for the Archdiocese of
Minneapolis and St. Paul
Rezoning request from R-2 and C-3 to R-3
Northwest corner of 5th S�r.eet and 6'Ist Avenue, north of
St. William's church. .
2.79 acres
N/A
R-2 and C-3 •
North, R-2 (duplexes); South, C-3 (church); East, R-1
(single family); West, C-3 (str.ip center).
Municipal services available.
$750.00 for residential lot s.plit. .
HRA assistance may be requested.
Yes.
Yes.
Site is depressed below street elevation, currently
used as a ballfield.
. . ..� �:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval.
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION N{a
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
Staff Report, ZOA #88-04 - ;
Community Development Corporation
Norwood Square
Page 2
REQUEST
The subject parcel., Lots 1- 16, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 30, Block
3, Norwood Addition, is bisected by two zoning districts. The R-
2, Two Family Dwelling district is located on the eastern half of
the property, immediately adjacent to 5th Street N.E. The C-3,
General Shopping Center district is located on the western half of
the property, abutting the Moon Plaza Shopping Center property.
This zoning pattern exists from the subject property south to 61st
Avenue N.E. and includes the existing church property. The R-2
district permits "housing for the elderly" as a special �se permit
and the C-3 district permits "housing for the elderly" as a
permitted use; however, staff advised the applicant to petition
for a rezoning in order that the property could be evaluated by one
district's regulations rather than having the property regulated
by two districts. The R-2 and C-3 districts do not contain the
appropriate lot and structure requirements to regulate the proposed
project. Further, the continuation of commercial zoning along the
rear portion of the Moon Plaza Shopping Center would not be
appropriate. Finally, the rezoning application to R-3 would
provide a buffer from the existing C-3 zoning to the west and
south.
ANALYSIS
In evaluating zoning district changes, the intent, uses and
structure regulations of the proposed district should be evaluated
to determine its compatibility with adjacent zoning and land uses.
The intent of the R-3 district is to permit a variety of
residential housing, including single family dwellings, two famiZy
dwellings and multiple dwelling complexes. These uses serve as a
buffer from uses permitted by commercial districts, such as the C-
3 district. Further, while the R-3 district permits multiple
family complexes at a higher density than the R-1 or R-2 districts,
multiple family dwellings can be compatible with single and two
family dwellings depending on design and locatiori.
The R-3 district permits hotels, motels and highrise apartment
buildings as a special use permit. As special uses, the City would
have the ability to deny potential applications if the use would
have adverse effects on the neighborhood. Upon preliminary
evaluation, these uses would not be appropriate at this location.
� :�. a ,,�; .
The lot and structure requireme�ts in the R-3 dis�rict�are more
restrictive than the setbacks in the R-2. The required setbacks
will maintain a 35 foot yard area along 5th Street N.E. and a 15
foot yard area adjacent to the existing duplexes to the north.
The lot area requirement dictates 2,500 square feet per living
� �
�
Staff Report, ZOA #88-04
Community Development Corporation
Norwood Square
Page 3
unit, however, the ordinance also allows a 300 square foot
reduction per underground parking space. The intent of this
regulation is to discourage as much on-surface parking as possible
and maximize the amount of open space. The staff report on�the lot
split application explains the necessity for a lot area easement
on the church property in order for the proposed site to meet the
lot area requirements.
CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed rezoning request will be consistent with the intent.
of the comprehensive plan to provide a variety of housing types in
order to meet the different housing needs of the City's residents.
The subject parcel is specifically identified in the comprehensive
plan as having potential for medium density housing development
(see atta,chment).� The proposed rezoning is also consistent with
the objectives of the Center City Redevelopment district in that
it will enable utilization of long vacant property.
SUMMARY
The proposed rezoning is appropriate as it will act as a buffer
between the existing commercial use and th� lower density
residential neighborhoods to the north and east. The.rezoning will
also eliminate two zoning districts bisecting the property.
Finally, the proposed rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive
plan and the redevelopment effort of the Center City district.
Staff recommendation for approval of the rezoning is conditioned
upon approval of the lot split request since it is necessary to
execute a lot area easement. It is not conditioned upon approval
of the special use permit request, since approval of the zoning
action is necessary in order to consider the special use permit
request. '
RECOMMENDATION
Planning staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend
approval of ZOA #88-04 to rezone Lots 1- 16, Block 1 and Lots 1
and 30, Block 2, Norwood Addition, from R-2 and C-3 to R-3, subject
to approval of lot split, L.S. #88-05.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of ZOA
#88-04, to rezone the subject parcel from R-2, Two Family Dwelling
and C-3, General Shopping, to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling,
subject to approval of the lot split request.
2D
�
Staff Report, ZOA #88-U4 "�"
�.:: .. -.
Community Development Corporation
Norwood Square
Page 4
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
At the February 13, 1989 City Council meeting, the public hearing
for the rezoning request was closed, and the special use permit
request was tabled in order to study the types of materials
proposed for the exterior facade. In response to the City
Council's concern, Muffie Gabler from Community Development
Corporation, has analyzed the construction and rental cost impacts
of using different building materials (see attached letter dated
March 9, 1989), specifically brick and wood versus rock face block
and aluminum siding.
Ms. Gabler states that providing an all brick exterior will
increase construction costs, interest and fees by $195,5.00. This
would cause an additional rental cost per unit of $34'.00 .per month.
She also states that an all brick exterior would present too much
of an institutional appearance.
Another option proposed is to replace the rock face block with
brick to the first floor windows. This would increase construction
costs by $73,300 and increase rental costs by $13.00 per unit per
month. Gabler states that Community Development Corporation will
not �ccept any scenario which includes wood siding because o€ i.ts
high maintenance and construction costs.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
Staff maintains its original recommendation to approve the proposed
materials, including the.rock face block to the first floor, and
� aluminum siding and •stucco. The proposal is �an appropriate
architectural treatment, given the location of the building in this
particular neighborhood. As the applicant correctly points out,
the proposed finishes are predominant with other housing structures
in the neighborhood. In order to address the Council's concerns,
the applicant has proposed an alternative to use a brick exterior
to the first floor windows. While brick has been incorporated into
recent multi-family projects such.as Springbrook Apartments, the
rock face block is an acceptable alternative.
It is recommended the City Council approve the ordinance for first
reading.
2E
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 20. I989 PAGE 9
conformity wit% State election laws at that t'te� He stated since
the State election laws do change fro me to time, and these
statutes supercede the Charter, seems best to remove the
specific requirement of the n of days and replace it with more
general terminology to co' ide with State statutes.
MOTION by Counci n Fitzpatrick to waive the first reading and
approve the inance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman
Jorgen . Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the otion carried unanimously.
5. CONSIDERATION OF FIRST READZNG OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A
REZONING. ZOA #88-04, BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION:
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated staf.f would recommend the
first reading of this rezoning ordinance, however, the second and
final reading of the ordinance would not be held until the
conditions of the lot split and speciaZ use permit have been
satisfied.
MoTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading and approve the
ordinance upon first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
6. CONSIDERATION OF ELIMINATING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF VAR
#88-26, BY STYLMARK, INC., 6536 MAIN STREET N.E::
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated Stylmark, Inc. was anted
a variance on November 15, 1988, with four stipulati s. She
stated one of the stipulations was that the applic t sub'mit a
landscape plan to the City staff for review and ap oval prior to
issuance of a building penait. She stated the pl was to increase
the existing parking lot screening from public 'ght-of-way and the
landscaping was to be installed by June 1, 9.
Ms. Dacy stated prior to the meeting t's evening, the staff inet
with Mr. Brink and Mr. Mooty regarding e parking lot landscaping.
She stated the original intent was provide landscaping in front
of the parking lot on the south de and on the southeast corner
of the property to screen the oading dock. Ms. Dacy stated Mr.
Mooty objected to the landsc ing between the parking lot and the
frontage road because the road is only used for the school bus
traffic in the mornings d afternoons and because the parking lot
cannot be seen from he traveled right-of-way of Mississippi
Street.
Ms. Dacy stat staff agreed that the landscaping in this a'rea
could be wa' ed, however, screening should be installed near the
loading k to meet the ordinance requirements. She stated as you
drive ong the service road, there is a full view of the loading
ZF
m
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13. 1989 Pg�`-g
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 8:58 p.m.
3.
AND
GRANT PROGRAMS•
MOTION by Councilman Fitzpatrick to waive the re ing of the publ ic
hearing notice and open the public hear' g. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upan a voice vote, 1 voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously nd the public hearing
opened at 8:59 p.m. _
Ms. Campbell, Planning Assistant, state there was a person present
to communicate with the hearing impa ed if this was necessary.
Ms. Campbell stated this hearing i in regard to the allocation of
1989 Community Development Blo Grant funds. She stated the
County has revised the 1989 al cation to $109,899. Ms. Campbell
stated the distribution of ese funds is proposed as follows:
$69,236 for the Riverview eights project; $34,068 for human
services; and $6,595 for mmercial rehabilitation.
No persons in the audie ce spoke regarding the ailocation of these
Community Development lock Grant funds.
MOTION by Council n Fitzpatrick to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Coun lman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee eclared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 9:05 p.m.
MOTION by C ncilman Fitzpatrick to approve the allocation of the
1989 Comm ity Development Block Grant funds as follows: $69,236
to the R' erview Heights project; $34,068 for human services; and
$6,595 for commercial rehabilitation. Seconded by Councilman
Schne'der. Upon a voice vote, Councilman Fitzpatrick, Councilman
Sch ider, Councilman Billings and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the
mo ion. Councilwoman Jorgenson abstained from voting. Mayor Nee
clared the motion carried.
4. PUBLIC HEARING ON A REZONING. ZOA #88-04 BY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MINNEAPOLIS
AND ST. PAUL. PER SECTION 205.09.O1.C.7 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE . TO ALLOW HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY ON LOTS 1 THROUGH 16
� BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1 AND 30, BLOCK 2, NORWOOD ADDITION TO
FRIDLEY PARK. GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF` `ST. WIELIAM'``S°'``CHi�R�:
MOTION by Councilman Billings to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded 'by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, ali voting aye, Mayor
2G �
FRIDLEY CI•��"'COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE 9
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
opened at 9:06 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated this is a request to rezone
property adjacent to St. William's Church from R-2 and C-3 to R-3
for a senior housing project. She stated the Planning Commission
considered the rezoning application and recommended approval.
Ms. Dacy stated the lot and structure requirements in the R-3
district are more restrictive than the setbacks in the R-2. She
stated the required setbacks maintain a 35 foot yard area along
5th Street and a 15 foot yard area adjacent to the existing
duplexes to the north.
Ms. Dacy stated this housing project will consist of 70 units, 50
one bedroom units and 20 two bedroom units. She stated common
areas will be provided, including laundry rooms, storage closets,
lobby, a dining/multi-purpose room, and a workshop and lounge.
Ms. Dacy stated the building is H-shaped and exterior materials
are masonry, rock face block, aluminum and stucco. She stated
adequate parking has been provided.
Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner, Community Development Corporation,
wanted to finalize their plans and apply to the HRA for funding.
She stated it was necessary to obtain an easement from the church
which would guarantee there would not be any buildings within the
easement in order to meet the R-3 district requirements.
Ms. Dorie Meade, Housing Resources Corporation, stated they are
providing technical services to the Community Development
Corporation for the Archdiocese of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Si�e
introduced Mr. Steve Ludovissie, Director of Housing and Management
for Community Development Corporation, the management arm for the
Archdiocese, and Mr. John Culligan, Architect from Boarman and
As�sociates. �
Ms. Meade stated the need for this project was first identified by
St. William's Church which established an elderly housing task
force. She stated St. William's agreed to make the site available
and an independent market study was conducted to determine the need :;
for the project. . Ms. Meade stated Community Development
Corporation agrees with the market study and feels this is an
excellent site for senior housing. She stated the name Norwood
Square was selected as this housing will be located in the City's
Norwood Addition.
�` Ms: Meade s�ated Norwood Square will have a full-time manager on _-
site and a personal security system included in each apartment.
She stated pull`cords will be located in each bath and bedroom for
residents to call for emergency help.
2H
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13,'�9 • PAGE 10
Ms. Meade stated Community Development Corporation plans to take
all the necessary steps to meet the range for rents recommended in
the independent market study. She stated, hopefully, rents will
start at $500 per month for a one bedroom unit and between $750 to
$800 per month�for a two bedroom unit.
Mr. Ludovissie stated Community Development Corporation was
established in 1974 and is a non-profit organization created for
the purpose of serving needs of low and moderate income families.
He stated they concentrate on the needs of residents in all the
buildings they manage.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked the size of the apartments.
Mr. Culligan, Boarman and Associates, stated the one bedroom units
will be about 608 sguare feet, but could vary up to 650 square
feet. He stated the building is three-stories, wood construction,
with underground parking. He stated the driveway entrance is on
the east to a central drop-off area which is handicapped accessible
to the main lobby. Mr. Culligan stated in addition to the H-shape
of the building, there is a hip roof to scale it down and minimize
the height fronting on the street. He stated three different types
of material will be used for the exterior including rock-faced
block, aluminum siding, and stucco.
Mr. Culligan stated they have worked with the City staff to develop
a landscaping plan that will enhance the building and character of
the neighborhood. He stated Norway Maples will be planted along
5th Street and crab trees planted around the parking lot. He -
stated there would be a four foot hedge betweet� the parking lot and
street. He stated eight foot evergreens would be planted to the
north along the entire property line.
Mr. Culligan stated they are proud of the project they have
developed and hoped the citizens of Fridley will also be proud of
it.
Some questions from the audience included the size of the bedrooms,
type of heating, laundry facilities, entrances, and rents. Mr.
Culligan stated tne bedrooms are about 12 feet wide by 15 feet
long. He stated the entire unit is about 24 feet wide. He stated
the heating is hot water baseboard and individual window units will
be provided for air conditioning. He stated there are laundry
facilities on each floor and one main entrance, but exits on each
wing for fire purposes. He stated the square footage for the two
bedroom unit i's between 800 to 1,OOO.and rents �zould be from $750
to $800 per month. . - " _ -
Ms. Meade stated rents have not been firmly established because
the financing has not yet been arranged. She stated, hopefully,
they will be between $500 to $800 per month depending on the unit.
-- 2'
�
�
"' FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1989 PAGE'il
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated underground parking would not be
available for all residents and asked how it would be determined
who would receive these parking spaces.
Mr. Ludovissie stated a lot of time senior citizens do not drive
and do not have vehicles. He stated probably only 50 to 60 percent
would have vehicles and the maj ority of tenants could be served
with underground parking.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if there would be an additional charge
for underground parking�.
1!�s. Meade stated there would be a charge and the rate is about $40
per month.
Mr. Ron Nienaber, 6251 5th Street, stated he is appalled with the
building materials proposed for this project. He stated what is
proposed is an industrial building material and aluminum is cheap.
He stated it appears they are building as cheaply as possible, but
the rents are high. He� also stated central air conditioning is
more energy efficient. He stated the units would still have their.
individual controls as they do with the heating.
Mr. Nienaber stated he is not necessary opposed to senior housing
across the street from his residence, but would like.to have a
nicer building.
Ms. Dacy stated the HRA would address this issue of exterior
materials if they apply for financial assistance.
Mr. Nienaber stated if this property is rezoned, technically, any
apartment building could be constructed and not necessarily senior
housing.
Ms. Dacy stated the procedure is established so that action would
be taken on the lot split and special use permit requests before
the final reading of the ordinance for this rezoning. She stated
restrictive covenants would be filed with the special use permit
that the building would be used only for senior housing.
Mr. Maertens, 144 Rivers Edge Way, stated he is the owner of a
duplex immediately to the north of this property. He stated he is
opposed to the exterior materials to be used as he felt they did
not belong in a residential neighbarhood. �
�.._�.
.. ._ Ms. Meade stated there seems to be a misunderstanding as far as a_
.. ��� ��'�the aluminum siding. She stated it is very unusual for residential °� »-� ��-°
dwellings to be constructed with wood siding because of the
constant maintenance. She �elt the building would be very
attractive and a combination of materials will make it appear more
residential in nature.
2J
�
�2IDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF °;�?E$�UA�tY 13 1989 ° PAGE �1�
Councilman Schneider stated Fridley has a tradition of requiring
brick or brick surfaces on buildings.
Ms. Meade stated it is something they could consider, but felt
brick would make it look more institutional.
A gentleman in the_audience commented that this was the nicest
looking apartment building he has seen proposed for Fridley.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed
rezoning request.
MOTION �by Councilman Schneider to��close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. -Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 9:55 p.m.
OLD BUSINESS•
5. CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #88-15 BY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF MINNEAPOLIS AND
Mayor Nee stated the question of the exterior aterials to be used
on this building was discussed in conjunct' n with the rezoning.
He felt the stipulations for the type exterior construction
would probably be part of this special se permit.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney,�felt ' would be.premature to take
action on the special use permi this evening if there is not
agreement on the exterior mater' ls.
Councilwoman Jorgenson felt �iie issue of the exterior materials to
be used in construction h�.ar to be addressed.
MOTION by Councilwoma Jorgenson to table this item until staff
and Community Deve opment Corporation discuss the exterior
materials and subm' recommendations to the Council. Seconded by
Councilman Schne' er. Upon a voice vote, Councilwoman Jorgenson,
Councilman Sch ider, Councilman Fitzpatrick and Mayor Nee voted
in favor of e niotion. Councilman Billings voted against the
motion. Ma r Nee declared the motion carried.
6.
0
ADDITION TO FRIDLEY PARK PLAT TO BE DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 -
THROUGH 16, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS.1 AND 30 BLOCK 2 NORWOOD
2K
r
I _
�
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
w. ,,.
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
February 25, 1993
William Burns, City Manager
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Special Use Permit Request, SP #93-01, by
Westminster Corporation
Attached please find the above-referenced staff report. -Approval
of the special use permit request would permit the construction of
a three story, 50 unit multiple family dwelling for elderly and
handicapped persons. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to
recommend approval of the request to the City Council with the
following amended stipulations:
1. A storm water pond main�enance agreement shall be executed and
recorded against the property.
2. An open air easement which is a minimum of 4,830 square feet
in area shall be executed and recorded against the St.
William's property. The proposed easement language shall be
reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution.
3. An underground irrigation system shall be installed one year
from the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
4. The applicant shall record restrictive covenants against the
property which dictate that the project is for the elderly and
handicapped only; elderly is defined as those persons 62 years
of age and older, and handicapped as defined in Section 202
regulations. The covenants shall be consistent with Section
202 regulations, and if Section 202 regulations are amended,
said covenants shall be amended with the mutual consent of the
City of Fridley. The covenants shall remain in effect for a
minimum of 40 years and longer if the law allows. The
covenants shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney
prior to recording. ..._.. _. .
5.
Lot split request, L.S. #93-01, shall be approved.
6. The exterior shall be brick.
SP_#93-01, by Westminster Corp.
February 25, 1993
Page 2
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
MM/dn
M-93-86
�,-�r
3�4 -
� . � _ � �.
r�
�
��
REQUEST
Permit Number
Appticani
Proposed
Request
Location
SITE DATA
Size
Density
Present Zonir�g
Present Land Use(s)
Adjacent
Zoning
Adjacent Land Use(s)
Utilities
Park Dedication
Watershed District
ANALYSIS
Financial Implications
Conformance to the
Comprehensive Plan
Compatibility wFth Adjacent
Zoning and Uses
Environmental
Considerations
RECOn'IlVIENDATION
Staff
Appeals Commiss;on
Planning Commission
Author MM/dn
S TAFF REP O RT
�.�: _
Community Development Department
Appeals Commission Date
Planning Commission Date : February 24 , 1993
City Council Date : March 1, 1993
SP 4�93-01
Westminster Corporation
To allow the construction of elderly housing in the
R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling district.
6200"`�� 5th Street N.E. � �
122,669.86 square feet
C-3, General Shopping Center and R-2, Two Family Dwelling
Vacant
C-3, General Shopping to the west; R-2, Two Family Dwelling
to the south and north; R-1, Single Family to the east
Retail and inst.itutional to the west; residential to the
nor.th and east.
Six Cities
1 with stipulations
Approval with stipulations
�
SP �� 93=-01 :
Westminster Corp.
� S �/2 SE`�: /4 T. 30 R. 24 ,
C/TY OF FR/OLEY
J,U�.. �i
,�, ,,
_--;�--.
��� � h
J � .
. �
Q�P �.
�ANE U,�
Jl� !�l '�n;{
/ �•. ",;•
�` , -
.::r-�
. oRivE ` �
`�, ,�<,�� :;��
� � P,,
;r1 �r)
�l,
_—N!�'IE � AV
�r� �� ";:�
r, ;a;.. „ �,
s '
ORtVE ;
�n� :[�1�: �R�.
-.� .��U Mn w) NJ
• DRIVE::-.
,,,�� ,'':�t• ��,I � .
� � ..'
S��
n
3!
�
I�
/�.
2 L.
�..�
�/
��
�
3C LOCATION MAP
�:�
i�`7
} I
H 1
� SP ��93-01
Westminster Corp.
� • c.: - — �. .� � . ,� 9 �: � � •• 6
� �_�,- 1 �-� ,} � ,� � z � , - , �.
6 � B. ` ' ,� 3 Z , '6:
_� .. /v � .o � �� 5,
♦ � 3 � 1
� _ � //��r�, F � ,
/ .. ' ,,� J 1 .�`/y �� B! '� �1 , ��b. �� Z.,3 •A �
� I /O' � . 4 . . �_ 1
.\ . . � � . /o ", r j/ � �
� �l t: � J �• {c b � I.
�( � � c c s � � z
� � �c
,��,�, �.
d16�+W�X-AICi---6— -------
C
�
�
�
? � ii
�ir � J �a , �
� �
1v q c ,� , i 4.
.f `�e �� %� Q
'`��ti B '3 'J i �,r !
�+,� � �� ` ' 'i�'� ,w t 1 4
i F '� s� .TERR ,.� � 3 s
.� � � oa�;Qs .< � �► � s
� � , N � ' � ;� P' �S^ ` ,�t „ �s ' �
., .o
f L.� gr� f,� 3 Z/ 6�7 L S� 3 !e � 6 � 9 � io
i
. �
� , � j /f �
� E; 6 7' 9 �o,�i��i�i�/! /t I/ /�'9 B. 7.� s 4 j�2'/ s�f�3 / .
� roa
/ � Y
. , �. �a , � , I � � � s 4 r z �'; � q g�i.i� �r ``�✓ .y .
� �
H. AVENUE. N. . � �;i �y�� �•,;� f�
.,} 4Y
/J �, � f �
,A , :�,s,•�i,; 6 �c�+o �,_
� EEK TiEf�R �o�� ,/� 6 � �a � ��' ti ,
s v �. c. s= f; 3 2 i � �'.__ .
--------__ —u{�Si�ec�oo� —��_ _.< � --.. eT
:q•1.... � .,
.:.•.v.•.,.�:
�
::�::. .I: �:... ... � r 9 P 7 s r c� i
��,�� ,_�. z
.i �: 751 .�r. yY p.
;v' •i, • � P 3 �* /J �t �) �/ !i 1� j� ?I Ij II J 'Q
�.�.;:.�:�;: 'f �. ,z i3
;-,�� :_.�ti: �y ,. ,,
i:���.,•'��iJ,, T •� 8� Io ./ 2e � Ia / /9
• • � �
�v'..•:� � � • • i9 1 / 1 /9 1 AI
.::i�?' • J b • 9 ,p � s
,�.: ".� � •• �• �� 10 ,� z �o y . u � q i
•.; •. ;r.•: �• • f"
,: �y,: � t il i c 3 i� � n 4 i 7 f N i�
�'S,9 ee� 12 ,f K ,� s,� f�
•• • •• 13 . f c ir G j1' s /�
� • �{; • • • •
�. 751 ����'�� �•�•�•� � 14 / 6 /f 9 .4 7 ,� 9 Li
� r • � • � � 15 � �1 7 i3 P �� S /3 1 /1
• � • •
' 16 � a / /,� 9 is � /� 7 //
i38 2 1 1918 17 ie ! ,ii ie i �s /i �� � a
. N.E.
�� 3I . / ! � i�2 1i 1� i9 il �7 is l�i l a i� J i �
.9'�. 3� 1 1 2 _ .
I
' 1,, sc 3 3 c. Y.;;� _
3r 4 s � F� �
. � .. :
�'�.•� f f � � � F`v j
L G �`� ��� �, i
�'.'. 7 7 �
.. J� d fl � � r
,�. I � � - �.i � �_`�' � � �
r, .. ,: ' fwFR�D C� �
, "
ii �i �', ,r, ��' � F R IQ�., E Y
7 .r =�. ,•:.;►��'�F ""t, :`��i'
�� L i3 � /1 � � �` `,� � �, M I D D
• S .ff � `.f w � � �
.�. , 3 /L /` ��• � � € I
i7 i� ����� ��.
_ �� z� ii is �3 f. d"1 �? z
' ro i! :'1 il r."_ � � }':�' �� ,� - - J
ZONING MAP
� Y: �s�s3h
Staff Report .-
SP #93-01, by Westminster Corporation
Page 2
REOUEST
The petitioner has requested a special use permit to allow the
construction of elderly housing in the R-3, General Multiple Family
Dwelling zoning district. In addition to the special use permit
request, the petitioner is also processing a lot split request to
create a separate parcel for the proposed development.
SITE
The property is vacant and is located between 5th Street N.E. and
: Moon Plaza, north of St. William's Church administrative building.
The property is currently zoned R-2, Two Family Dwelling, and C-3,
General Shopping Center District. In 1989, the City Council held
the first reading of a rezoning, to rezone the subject parcel to
R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling. Adjacent parcels are zoned
C-3, General Shopging Center District to the south and west, R-2,
Two Family Dwelling to the north, and R-1, Single Family Dweliing
to the east.
Historv
In 1988, the Community Development Corporation proposed to
construct a 70 unit, three story elderly high-rise with underground
parking. The project was comprised of 50 one-bedroom and 20 two-
bedroom units. The exterior treatment was proposed to be brick,
siding, and stucco. At that time, the project was not constructed
due to a lack of available funding.
The City Council approved the ordinance rezoning the property to
R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling for first reading on March
20, 1989. Second and final reading will occur along with the lot
split and special use permit.
ANALYSIS
Westminster Corporatiom, which is a subsidiary of the Community
Development Corporation, has recently received confirmation of
Section 202 federal funding to construct a new elderly housing
project. The current proposal is a three story, 50 unit, low and
moderate income elderly and handicapped facility. The project does
not have underground pa`rking or garages. The exterior is proposed
to be brick. A comparison of the 1988 and 1992 projects is
provided as Appendix A. _ ,
�� . �.� �Y����
Zoning Requirements
The proposed project meets the minimum setback, height, and lot
width requirements set forth in the R-3, General Multiple Family
3E
Staff Report --
SP #93-01, by Westminster Corporation
Page 3
Dwelling district. The project, however, does not meet the minimum
lot area requirement of 127,500 square feet. The minimum lot area
is calculated by multiplying 2,500 square feet by the number of
units (51).
The project provides only 122,670 square feet. The project is
short approximately 4,830 square feet. The shortfall is proposed
to be resolved through the execution and recording of an open air
easement on the church's property adjacent to the south lot line
of the subject parcel. The original proposal also included an open
air easement; however, as the original project was larger, the
original open air easement was 37,600 square feet. Staff has
encouraged the petitioner to obtain the additional square footage
required to meet the minimum lot area. Approximately 15.78
additional feet of progerty needs to be acquired to meet the
minimum lot area.
The proposal provides 34 parking spaces on the north side of the
building with an additional 45 "proof of parking" spaces indicated
on the plan should the building demand additional parking. The
minimum required by the R-3 district regulations is 77 spaces.
The proposed parking plus the "proof of parking" spaces totals 79
spaces. This includes two handicapped spaces to be located
adjacent to the building.
Landscapinq
The petitioner has submitted a preliminary landscape plan which
meets the minimum requirements of the R-3 zoning district. While
specific plant materials for each proposed location have not been
selected, the pallet of plant materials proposed is acceptable.
The petitioner has also provided a screening fence along the north
lot line adjacent to the existing duplexes. This screening fence
is required as there is a change in zoning districts which occurs
along this property line. An underground irrigation system is also
required to be installed.
Grading and Drainac,ie Plan
The petitioners have submitted a preliminary grading and drainage
plan which was reviewed by the Assistant Public Works Director,
Scott Erickson. Please see his letters dated January 20, 1993 and
February 9, 1993. The petitioner has since submitted corrected
plans based on his comments. The petitioner will be required to
�� execu�e' and ��`��:�a�t� against the property a storm water pond
maintenance agreement..
3F
Staff Report _
SP #93-01, by Westminster Corporation
Page 4
Exterior Treatment
The 1988 project proposed a combination of exterior materials to
include brick, stucco, and siding. The intent of the exterior
treatment was to allow the project to blend in with the e�cteriors
of the existir�g single family homes. The current project proposes
to use an all-brick exterior if HUD will agree to finance it. The
petitioners have, however, submitted an alternative exterior aption
which would include using a combination of brick and aluminum
siding for the exterior. Both exterior proposals are acceptable
alternatives.
As the proposed project meets the minimum requirements of the R-3,
General Multiple Family Dwelling district, staff recommends that
the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to the
City Council for a special use permit to allow elderly housing,
with the following stipulations:
l. A storjm water pond maintenance .agreement shall be executed and
recorded against the property.
2. An open air easement which is a minimum of 4,830 square feet
in area shall be execute and recorded against the St.
Will.iam's property. The proposed easement language shall be
reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution.
3. An underground irrigation system shall be installed.
4. The applicant shall record restrictive covenants dictating
that the project is for the elderly only and is not an
apartment to be rented to the general public. The covenants
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's office
prior to recording.
5. Lot split request, L.S. #93-01, shall be approved.
PLANNING COMMISSTON ACTION
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the request to the City Council with the following amended
stipulations:
1. A storm waster p��.;���tenance agreement shall be executed and
recorded against the property.
3G
Staff Report _ -
SP #93-01, by Westminster Corporation
Page 5
2. An open air easement which is a minimum of 4,830 square feet
in area shall be execute and recorded against the St.
William's property. The proposed easement language shall be
reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution.
3. An underground irrigation system shall be installed one year
from the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
4. The applicant shall record restrictive covenants against the
property which dictate that the proj ect is for the elderly and
handicapped only; elderly defined as those persons 62 years
of age and older, and handicapped defined as in;��Section 202
regulations. The covenants shall be consistent with Section
202 regulations, and if Section 202 regulations are amended,
said covenants shall be amended with the mutual consent of the
City of Fridley. The covenants shall remain in effect for a
minimum of 40 years and longer if the law allows. The
covenants shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney
prior to recording.
5. Lot split request, L.S. #93-01, shall be approved.
6. The exterior.shalT be brick.
CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the,City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
3H
\ , ' I
PLANNING COMMISSION MELTING. FEBRIIARY 24, ��t�'93 - PAG13 2
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE 'PERMIT SP
#93-01, BY WESTMINSTER COl2PORATION:
Per Section 205.09.01.(C).(7} of the Fridley City Code, to
allow homes for the elderly on Lots 1-16, Block l, and Lots
1 and 30, Block 2, Norwood Addition to Fridley Park, together
with vacated streets and alleys. The site totals 127,505
square feet and is generally located north and east of St.
William's Church abutting 5th Street N.E.
MoTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to open the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTB, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DBCLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THTs PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:47 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated this property is generaily located west of
5th Street and east of Moon Plaza and north of the St. Williams
Church administration building. The property is currently zoned
both C-3, General Shopping District, and R-2, Two Family Dwelling.
Ms. McPherson stated that in 1988, the City Council reviewed a
series of land use requests for this same parcel of land which
included a special use permit for elderly housing, a lot split to
create a separate development parcel, and a rezoning request to
rezone the property from its current zoning to R-3, General
Multiple Dwelling. At that time, the Council.held the first
reading of the ordinance to rezone the property, and the Council
will need to hold the second and final reading as required by City
Charter to rezone the property to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling.
Ms. McPherson stated the proposal in 1988 was to construct a 70
unit, three story elderly high rise facility with underground
parking. The project was comprised of 50 one-bedroom units and 20
two-bedroom units. The project was intended to be a combination
of brick, siding, and stucco for the exterior treatment. The
project was not constructed due to the lack of available funding.
Ms. McPherson stated the current proposal is for a three story,
multiple family dwelling for elderly and handicapped persons and
is a 50, one-bedroom facility. The petitioner is proposing an all-
brick exterior and there will not be any underground or surface
garages. The building is proposed to be built perpendicular to 5th
Street in an east/west orientation with an open lawn area to the
south. The entrance to the building will face north, and the
surface parking lot will also be to the north.
Ms. McPherson stated that as proposed, the building meets the
minimum setback, height, and lot width requirements for the R-3,
General Multiple Family Dwelling district. However, the building
does not meet the minimum lot area requirement of 127,500 square
31
PLANNING COMMISSION MFETING, FEBRIIARY 24. 1993� =�-?f°'"' -_ --- PAGE 3
feet. The lot area is calculated by multiplying the number of
units by 2,500 square feet.
Ms. McPherson stated an open air easement is proposed to the south
of the proposed south property line which is intended to meet the
minimum lot area requirement.� This open air easement is roughly
4,800 square feet in area. In 1988, a similar solution was
proposed for the original 70-unit building; however, the open air
easement needed to be 37,600 square feet in area.
Ms. McPherson stated that 34 surface parking spaces are proposed
to be constructed located north of the building. The building has
been designed so that large vehicles can utilize the pick-up/drop-
off area in front of the building. The peti�ioner is also
proposing "proof of parking" directly north of the proposed parking
area. This proof of parking is required in order to meet the
minimum number of parking spaces which is 77. Tn managing similar
projects, the petitioner has determined that the original 34 spaces
wil2 be adequate; however, if demand is greater, they will have
adequate space to construct the additional spaces.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has submitted a preliminary
landscape plan as required by code. The landscape plan meets the
minimum code requirements set forth in the R-3 zoning district.
A screening fence or some type of screening is required:between
the multiple family district and the two family district to the
north. Underground irrigation is also required by code. A grading
and drainage plan has been submitted and reviewed by the Assistan�
Public Works Director, Scott Erickson. The petitioner has
submitted amended plans based on Mr. Erickson's review. The
petitioner has also signed and submitted to staff a stormwater pond
maintenance agreement that has been sent to Anoka County to be
recorded against the property.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner has submitted eZevation plans
of the proposed development. The petitioner is proposing an all-
brick exterior at this time; however, it is possible that the
Federal Government through HUD may not agree to finance the all-
brick exterior. Therefore, the petitioner has developed a second
exterior plan which would utilize both brick and siding. Both
exterior plans are acceptable to staff.
Ms . McPherson stated that as the proposed proj ect meets the minimum
requirements of the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling district, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of this
special use permit request to the City Council with the following
five stipulations:
.. . ... „ :.�s<�.a:::;>r '. .
l. A storm water pond maintenance agreement shall be
executed and recorded against the property.
3J
PLANNING COMMISSION MESTING. FEBROARY 24. 1993 �-Pi�&L 4
2. An open air easement which is a minimum of 4,830 square
feet in area shall be executed and recorded against St.
Williams property. The proposed easement language shall
be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution.
3. An underground irrigation system shall be installed.
4. The applicant shall record restrictive covenants
dictating that the project is for the elderly only and
is not an apartment to be rented to the general public.
The covenants shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney's office prior to recording.
5. Lot split request, L.S. #93-01, shall be approved.
Mr. Kondrick stated he is concerned about lighting in the parking
lot area. What provisions have been made for lighting in the
parking lot area, and what type of light standards are proposed?
Ms. McPherson stated lighting in the parking lot is shown on the
site plan. The petitioner will have to address the type of
lighting.
Mr. Kondrick stated he is concerned about the exterior of the
building. He wanted to make sure that this is a building that is
going to look nice, rather than a design that will make the
building look like a barracks. It has to be a building that the
residents will be proud to live in and that will not be an eyesore
to the neighbors.
Ms. Dacy stated that is the reason staff asked the petitioner to
submit the second elevation. If the all-brick exterior is not
approved by HUD, the second elevation; a combination of siding and
brick, is similar in design to the elevation approved in 1988. If
the Commission feels the second alternative design is not
acceptable, the Commission will need to e�ress that to the
petitioner.
Ms. Sherek stated that stipulation #4 indicates that the project
is for the elderly only; yet staff stated that this is a project
for both elderly and handicapped.
Ms. McPherson stated that the petitioner has indicated that this
is for both elderly and handicapped persons so stipulation #4 will
have to be amended to reflect that.
Ms. Modig stated there will be 51 units in the building, yet only
34 spaces are proposed at this time. i+�here i�-��the ���t�.�arking?
Ms. McPherson stated the parking is proposed for both resident and
visitor parking. This is based on Westminster's experience at
other similar facilities.
3K
=�LANNING COMMISSION MEETING. FEBRIIARY 24, 1993 PAGE 5
Ms. Modig asked who will monitor who is parking in the lot.
Ms. McPherson stated monitoring would have to be done by the
resident manager. Certain spaces will. be clearly marked as visitor
parking only.
Mr. Chuck Prentice, Westminster Corporation, stated he is the
Budget Manager for this project. Long before his involvement or
Westminster's involvement with this project, St. Williams Church
was interested in helping to bring about a development for senior
citizens on this site beginning in about 1972. In the mid-1980's,
St. Williams contacted Community Development Corporation of the
Arch Diocese of St. Paul/Minneapolis which resulted in the 1988
prraposal. The Community Development Corporation of the Arch
Diocese changed hands and became Westminster Corporation. From
1988 to the present, they have followed through with the church
council and, at this time, have won a commitment from HUD for a
"Reservation of Funds" for this project. HUD will provide the
money to build the project and will provide the Section 8 subsidy
for rents in the project. The rent for all the units will be
according to the Section 8 rule which is that persons of qualifying
income would pay 30� of their monthly income for rent.
Mr. Prentice stated there is certainly a need for senior housing
in Fridley. In their submittals to HUD, they have had very strong
substantiation of the need from documents that have been produced
by Anoka County, the Metropolitan Council, and the Housing Study
done for the City of Frid�ey. Most recently, they have received
documentation from St. Williams which was a listing of 65 peo}�le
who have inquired about this housing. In addition, he contacted
the manager of the Village Green development which has 100 units
for senior citizens. The manager told him she was very glad to
hear about this development. Village Green's waiting list is
upwards to five years. So, there is a definite need for affordable
housing for the elderly in this area.
Mr. John Culligan, Architect from Boorman, Kroos, Pfister, stated
that he was also involved with the original design in 1988. He
stated that of the 51 units, there are 50 one-bedroom units and
one two-bedroom unit for the resident manager. The one-bedroom
units are 545 square feet in size, the maximum allowed by HUD.
Mr. Culligan stated that regarding the site plan, there are several
design aspects he would like to point out. The building is three
stories, approximately 40 feet.in height from grade to the top of
the roof. They were concerned about the scale of the building
���-�.:��e:�ative to the neighborhood, so their site plan refle.�rE,ts th� :.�
design inputs to accommodate that. The building is designed at a
.90 degree angle to 5th Street to reduce the scale of the facade to
the street. Another concern was the location of the building
footprint relative to the size of the overall property
3L
��' � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. FEBRIIARY 24. 1993 � PAGE G�°� °'
configuration. By locating the parking and the entrance on the
north side of the building, they were able to create two green
spaces for the residents, also reducing a negative impact to the
neighbors to the north. They took advantage of the dip in grading
so that the building is actually about 7 feet below the street
level, so the height actually becomes 33 feet in height from the
surface of 5th Street.
Mr. Culligan stated that regarding the lighting, they are also
concerned about adequate lighting in the parking lot and access to
the building. These are single shoebox type light fixtures that
light the parking surface and sidewalks only, and the poles are at
15-18 feet in height.
�'a- Mr. Culligan stated are requesting the approval of two schemes,
one of which is the all-brick scheme. They will be proposing the
all-brick scheme ta HUD. However, they are concerned about a
commercial appearance with a three story, all-brick building so
they have taken steps to reduce the vertical scale of the building
and emphasize the horizontal scale of the building.
� .
Mr. Culligan stated that in terms of the second scheme, a
combination of brick and steel siding, they are utilizing the same
design concept of reducing the vertical scale and emphasizing the
horizontal scale of the building.
Mr. Prentice stated they will soon be presenting to HUD the design
and the estimates of the costs associ.ated with the design. HUD
will then review that. The Federal Section 202 program which is
a program for affordable housing for elderly and handicapped will
not fund certain things, and one thing they will not fund is the
development of garages. That is why garages are not proposed with
this development. HUD will also not fund irrigation systems. He
is referring to stipulation #4 and wondered if that stipulation
could be waived or put on some time of time plan under which they
could meet the stipulation after the initial development.
Mr. Kondrick stated that south of the proposed building, there is
a large play area, a softball area. How far will the building be
from this area? He would be concerned about is noise from this
play area would be objectionable to the residents of the building.
�:
Mr. Culligan stated the play area is about 200 feet from the edge
of the building. They are creating a grassy area and are providing
landscaping and trees along 5th Street. They are•also submitting
to HUD an upg�-aded �landscaping plan that will create a shrubbed
plaza area off the main first floor lounge with a balcony deck for
the residents to enjoy the back yard. They wil:�a also� �� '?._�,
designating a certain area as a garden area. He did not think
sound traveling over 20U feet and penetrating an insulated exterior
wall is going to be a problem. Windows may be open in the summer,
but air conditioner sle�ves will �te g�vided for each unit.
3M
Pi,ANNING ,�I88ION MEETING-. FEBRIIARY 24. 1993 PAGL 7
Ms. McPherson stated there are families with small children who
live north of the proposed project in the duplexes. The City has
never received any complaints from the existing neighborhood
regarding any noise. She did not know how this could be controlied
unless the church chose to control who uses the church property as
a play area.
Mr. Sielaff asked about building maintenance, and who would make
sure that the building is maintained.
Mr. Prentice stated he is not aware of any HUD requirement for
maintenance of the building.
Ms. Dacy sta�`ed that every year the owner and management company
will have to submit a rental license application. The building
wi13 have to meet building codes and City building code.
Mr. Newman stated that if staff determines that additional parking
is needed, will Westminster have the resources available to pay for
the installation of additional parking?
Mr. Prentice stated it might be a question of having to respond
over time incrementally. Their experience has led them to believe
that the entire additional area would not need to be done six
months after the building is built. If there is a need for 6-10
parking spaces, because it probably could be treated on that kind
of incremental basis, he believed the project would be able to
support that additional expenditure.. Also, based on their
experience, they have found that larger number of parking spaces
is generalZy needed.at the star.t-up of the building. As residents
age, some of them who came in owning a car may end up giving up
their cars.
Ms. Modig stated that might be true for the elderly; however, this
building is also for the handicapped.
Mr. Prentice stated there are only three handicapped units in the
building. For a person with a handicap other than a wheelchair-
type handicap, if they-meet the income guidelines, they would be
eligible for the other units.
Ms. Modig asked if there is any age restriction for the
handicapped.
Mr. Prentice stated he did not know if there is an age restriction
for the handicapped.
� .v � .. . .
Mr. Kondrick asked what is to prevent this building from changing J
from a building for the elderly and handicapped to a building that
can be rented by other low income people.
3N
PLANNING COMMISBION MEBTING, FBBR�� 2.4. 1993 PAGB 8
Mr. Prentice stated one factor in limiting the building to another
type of use is that there will be 50 one-bedroom units. The 40
year term of the mortgage would accelerate and be due and payable
at any time during that 40 years if they did not continue to meet
the HUD rules that all their residents conform to HUD Section 8
standards for the elderly and handicapped. So, during that 40 year
period, if they tried to have residents other than Section 8
qualified elderly and handicapped, they would have a huge debt
accelerate on the property. To clarify, this is Section 202 which
is HUD financing for the development of housing for the elderly and
handicapped and carries with it a Section 8 provision to provide
subsidized rents for the residents over the 40 year period.
Ms. Sherek stated that stipulation 4 talks about the recording of
restrictive covenants dictating that � project is for the elderly
and handicapped.
Mr. Prentice stated another assurance is that this project is being
developed by Westminster Corporation and will be owned by a local
affiliate non-profit board. Both are non-profit entities formed
and dedicated to the provision of affordable housing.
Mr. Newman stated that for the purpose of restrictive covenant,
what age is defined for the elderly?
Mr. Prentice stated that the age for the Section 202 provision is
62 years of age; and, in the case of a couple, one person must be
62 years of age. Perhaps the wording could be added to stipulation�
#4 such as "in conformance with the requirements of the HUD Section
202 program". They are comfortable with the restrictive covenant
being placed on the property for the affordability concern and for
the type of housing for senior citizens.
Mr. Joe Maertens, 144 River Edge Way, stated he owns the duplex
directly to the north of this proposed development. He stated he
is very pleased with the design and layout of the building. He
especially likes the buffer between the apartment building and the
duplexes. He stated he is strongly in favor of an ali-brick
exterior, especially in a residential neighborhood. In his
opinion, siding on a building of this s.ize would be a serious
degradation in quality.
Mr. Jim Saefke, 6131 - 5th Street, stated he has lived directly
across from this proposed development for about 19 years. After
looking at the back of Moon Plaza and dumpsters for many years, he
is very pleased with this particular design. It is also a great
use for this piece of property. It outranks a lot of other things
that could go in�o,, that ...garti��,r�c�a. He would welcome senior
citizens and handicapped to this neighborhood.
Mr. Saefke stated he is also the President of the �t. Williams
Parish Council which has reviewed thes�e plans, and they do not have
���
PLANNINt3 COMMISSION MBETING. FLBRIIARY 24, 1993 ,��-}�A6L 9
any problem with the easement requirement or the green space. He
would prefer to have the all-brick exterior also, but would be in
favor of the brick/siding exterior if necessary. He stated there
is a good mix of young, middle age, and older people in his
neighborhood. The road was built to handle this additional
traffic.
Mr. Saefke stated that he sees very little use of the play area,
except when neighborhood children get together to play ball.
Mr. Bruce Nelson, 90 Rice Creek Way, stated he is a member of St.
Williams and part of the group who have been working on this
project for a number of years. The Church itself has expended a
considerable amount of money to get to this point. He stated the
play area is somewhat bermed so it is not a very large ar�a.
Mr. Nelson stated the way the parking lot is laid out, some of the
spaces are wider so from the standpoint of access for the
handicapped persons, this will also help.
Mr. Nelson stated that in making their initial selection, they
chose Westminster primarily because of their broad-based experience
and long term commitment to housing for the eZderly and
handicapped.
Mr. Kondrick asked about building security.
Mr. Culligan stated that the main front vestibule has a telephone
buzzer system access for the residents and the community room.
The end stairwell doors are locked from the outside 24 hours a day.:
Mr. Newman asked if the petitioner is looking at seamless steel
siding. It would certainly approve the appearance of the building.
Mr. Culligan stated the specifications have not yet been fine-
tuned. They could make that part of the recommendations.
Ms. Dacy stated that since the petitioner has raised the issue
about the cost of underground irrigation, the Commission may want
to consider amending stipulation #3 to provide a 2-3 year timeframe
for the petitioner to comply. It would.be consistent with other
stipulations in the past like hard surface driveways, installation
of landscaping, etc.
Mr. Virgil Farasyn, 700 Rice Creek Terrace, stated he is a member
of St. Williams and a resident of Fridley for many years. He
wanted to express his support for the-.,:�rojec�-.� A�� ;r of St.-
Williams, he would rather see an apartment for the elderly than
some commercial building that would degrade the property.
3P
_:--�`,. -PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. FEBRIIARY 24, 1993 PAGE 10
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Savage, to cYose the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICS VOTB� ALL VOTING AYB� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSSD AT 9t10 P.M.
Mr. Kondrick s�ated he believed that the Commission should add a
stipulation to recommend only the all-brick exterior. In
stipulation #4, he would like to insert wording that guarantees
that the project will be for the elderly and handicapped for the
40 years.
Ms. Dacy stated it was.staff's interpretation that it would be in
perpetuity and run with the property. �
Ms. McPherson stated staff will research this to see if there is
a statutory limit.
Mr. Kondrick stated he is very reluctant to either waive the
underground irrigation requirement or provide a timeframe for
compliance (stipulation #3).
Ms. Dacy suggested a timeframe for the irrigation system of one
year from the certificate of occupancy.
Mr. Newman asked if the petitioner would be agreeable to that
deadline.
Mr. Prentice stated he is unable to answer that. It was his
understanding that the Board would be more comfortable with a 2-3
year timeframe.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend to
City Council approval of special use permit, SP #93-01, by
Westminster Corporation, per Section 205.09.01.(C).(7) of the
Fridley City Code, to allow homes for the elderly on Lots 1-16,
Block 1, and Lots 1 and 30,'Block 2, Norwood Addition to Fridley
Park, together with vacated streets and alleys. The site totals
127,505 square feet and is generally located north and east of St.
Williams Church abutting 5th Street N.E., with the following
stipulations: �
1. A storm water pond maintenance agreement shall be
executed and recorded against the property.
�� -1m_; z.
2. An open air easement which is a minimum of 4,830 square
feet in area shall be executed and recorded against St.
��`°���-`'���-` Williams ro ert The � - � :�
p p y. proposed easement��languag� sha� ,,
be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution. �
3. An underground irrigation system shall be installed one
year from the issuy�nce of a certificate of occupancy.
3Q
0
PLANNING COMMIBSION ME��T(# --%'EBRIIARY 24 1993 PAGB 11
4. The applicant shall record restrictive covenants against
the property which dictate that the project is for the
elderly and handicapped only; elderly defined as those
persons 62 years of age and over, and handicapped as
defined in Section 202 regulations. The covenants shall
be consistent with Section 202 regulations, and if
Section 202 regulations are amended, said covenants shall
be amended with the mutual consent of the City af
Fridley. The covenants shall be in effect for a minimum
of 40 years and longer if the laws allows. The covenants
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior
to recording.
5. Lot split request.; L.S. #93-01, shall be approved.
6. The exterior of the building shall be of all-brick
construction. �
Ms. Modig stated she is concerned about stipulation #6. She did
not want to create a timeframe problem for the developer.
Ms. Sherek stated that if the all-brick exterior is not acceptable
to HUD, and the petitioner has to revise the proposal for the
exterior for brick and steel siding, she did not believe it would
be necessary for the petitioner to come back before the Planning
Commission and the petitioner could go directly to the City
Council.
The Commission members agreed.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
3.
WESTMINSTER CORPORATION:
To create a separate parcel from the Norwood ition to
Fridley Park plat, to be described as Lots 1- , Block 1, and
Lots 1 and 30, Block 2, Norwood Additi to Fridley Park,
together with vacated streets and a ys. The site totals
127,505 square feet and is gener y located north and east
of St. Williams Church abutti 5th Street N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seco ed by Ms. Modig, to open the informal
public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE LL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPBRSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE
MOTION4 CARRIED:=; -'!lHE���1QR1�Ip�I, pIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 9:20 P.M.
Ms. McP son stated the third and last land use request is for a
lot it. Currently, the proposed development parcel is under
t ownership of the St. William's Church �,nd is considered part
3R
NORWOOD SOIIARE PROJECT COM$#RI803+�8
1988 Project Components 1992
70 . . . . . . . . . . Number of Units . . . . . . . . 51
121,500 sq. ft.. . . . Lot Area. . . . . . . . . . . . 122,669.86 sq. ft.
"H" Design . . . . . . Building Design . . . . . . . Straight, 90
degrees to street
78 + 39 "proof . . . . Number of Parking . . . . .. . . 34 + 45 "proof of
of parking" Spaces parking"
Brick, stucco, . . . . Exterior Treatment . . . . . . Brick
siding
37,600 sq.ft. . . . . "Open Air" Easement . . . . . . 4,787 sq.ft.
3S
+� � � 4 'q.� yt � � { .
,�r
� "aa
� r*. �
�7�+ 1 .�
p �y^ �� +� "J y� � .. . . . . .
y ..4.. ♦ ` �;t .
e ���,
j' t
CITY OF FRIDIyEY � p _ .,.
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. �� ' `° ":
.., , ; '
FRIDLEY, Mlv 55432
.: . . . . . . 1: ::: a :- . , . . ...... . � . . _ .. . ,. .. :: . „c .
r (612) 571-3450 ; � ; COMMUNITY: DEVELOPMENT.DEPARTMENT�.,� '
�� '
;J. ..
... _
_
,. :
_
_ ,�. ., ,.
:a�, . . . r.
��� . t � � � SPECIAL USE PERMIT-APPLICATION�FORM�� ` SY,��: '
.;
. w ,
PROPERTY INFORMATION�= site plan required for submittal; see �attached ,
62xx Fifth Street `"Northeast �� � u� ��
Address: (p ' (.�' '
Property Identification Number (PIl� -
Legal description: see attached
Lot �lock Tract/Addition
Current zoning: R2/c3 Square footagelacreage.
Reason for special use permit To' allow for" fconst�uction of a 3 story residential
structure. Section of Ciry Code: -`�
Have you opera.ted a business in a ciry which required a business license?
Yes No � If yes, which city?
If yes, what rype of business�
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No .
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) �
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing)
NAME Church of Sf. William `` _
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
61st Avenue Northeast & University Avenue Northeast _
Fric�ley � nev�rrr�� vun�r� 571-5600
NAME Westminster Corporation
ADDRESS 328 Kellogg Boulevard West
St. Paul, r� 55102 DAYTIMEPHONE ` 29�-1750
SIGNATURE �� �-�- - DATE 1 J 12 / 93 -
ar es . rentice, ro�ect anager
Fee: $2�4•00 '�� $100.00 for residential2nd accessory buildings �;.
Permit SP #% 3-C� � Receipt #" ; 1 l a-
Application received by: - � �� � _ . _
Scheduled Planning Commission date: ��Z�� ��� �
Scheduled City Council date: -- :
_ s�;, � ,� �� �-, ..�.
��, �. r. 5
� ,
�-�� L�
� } �3T �
I
r
�����
SuavEYtN� S�RVI�ES INC,
Prapased OP�N AYR �ASfM£NT
An Ea�sement over �nd across th�� part of Lots 2 and 29, Bla�k 2.
NORWOOD ADRITION TO FRIpLEY FARK, according to the recorded ptat
thereaf� Anoka County.a�Minnesota, and thdt part of Yacated 5�'H
Avenue and t�at part of y��ated ATley within and adjoining sa�id
Btock 2, described as follows:
�eginning at the nartheast corner of sald Ldt �; thence �
S 0°18'58"W an an �ssamed bearing Stong the east line
� af said tot Z, a distance of I5.80 feet; thence N 89°
O1'44"�t, a dis��nce of 303.40 feet; thence N p°20'45"E.
—-_ ____ a� d#stan�e of =�5r$0 -feet; thence S 89°01'44"� along the
-- -- _- _
� -- � =- _- �� wesier-ly :extens��n <�nd the narth 1 tne of said i.ats 2 and
29, a distance of 302.98 feet to the paint oi beginnir�g.
0
(Easemen� Area � �,787 Sq. Ft,)
0
1971 Senecd Road :+ Sulte E •��r►. Mlnnesota 55122 • {612) 452-3077
- �������o� ��a� _
__ QROPERTY
Blocl� a�+e 4 t)+ and Lat3 one �and titlrty �
1-tfiy. incluaive � a�ordin� to the dc:lY
1,ots o�ee to slxtea�o oad Addi�ion � Fridiar Ya�•
in 81oak T�+a t 2? . '
reeord�d P1s�t thereof. -
�s ���d Aye.), dedieated in ttse Pl$t of
M 1 betxaan the northerlY �c�ensiocs of
idat P�►rt of vacated Ker�t St. (� kl �
NNor�rood Addition ta Fridley � �d �lat.
the sast and xc�t line� of Blook 2'knawn �s 4�b SLc�aet?. dedicatei! in the plat
•�t p�rt of �raogt•ed St� Ave. In� M ��t�e� the �9terly �tensiott af
e ractansi�nn at' the
of "l�art�+aod A�dition �o F�'l�dltT �arY . 1?�8 � ��ter1Y
t.� line o f Lflt 3� � Bla�c x•°�d ��'�`�' �
tha � � Blook 7 � �n p�t'
uort.� lina of i.ot 6. }� Frl.dley Fa�'k", -- .
a�b�pod Addit�os�
e in 81� 1. �t =:� �: 8i�ek 1� t�
That part of the vacatea all Y�� �r t� nortls. line -�
17� betkeee� tbe ues�erly � t.�t line of LQt g, aaid �look �. •
WesLecl7 ex�ension of the � ta Fridley Pa��r
- �ddi�loa
su B2.oe�t 2. '�°� 3a1d l�ook 2
�t p�rt of tbs ya�t� �h u �. e.� �'tl� liaa at Lot �.
1�� b�tmeea the wsatar'� ���� �� af Lot �, said Blocic 2-
�d tde xeste�'17 eX� , �
3V
b
};
a
._
t�
�
:
i,
�
Y.
.
'i'-
.
r�
. _
_
C� 1 1 OF
FRIDLEY
FRtDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY. MN 554�i2 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287
January 20, 1993
Boarman Kroos Pfister & Associates
222 North Second Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
Genttemen:
PW93-013 �
The following comments pertain to the plans for the Fridley Senior Housing Project.
1. The ponding area should be designed as a detention basin with a
restricted outlet to the existing storm drain manhole. A skimmer shaA be
installed at the. outlet to the basin. Provide skimmer details.
2. . Clearly define the drainage areas. �
3. Please provide backup information on the time of concentrations and
intensities that are being used.
4. Provide hydraulic calculations for the restricted outiet from the basin.
5. Show calculations for ponding volumes.
6. A minimum of 1 foot of freeboard should be used on the basin.
7. Design the driveway to prevent runoff entering from 5th Street.
8. Note that concrete curb and gutter (B618 or B612) is required.
9. Rip-rap inlet to the pond.
10. Maintain separation between the water and sewer services as required by
the Department of Health.
11. Ponding cafculation will be reviewed on next�submittal.
12. Sign plans.
3W�
January 20, 1993
Page 2
13. A maintenance agreement needs to be executed with the City of Fridley for
private maintenance of the storm drainage facilities.
14. Additional information may be forthcoming pending further review.
15. Return original review prints with the next submittal.
If you have any additional questions regarding this review, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
,� � .
, ../��J�'i%�t `-�--<:-1- _-
Scott B. Erickson
Assistant Public Works Director
3X
0
_
_
F��IYOF
RIDLEY
FR[DLEY MUNIC[PAL CENTER • 643 f UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55�132 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287
February 9, 1993
Boarman Kroos Pfister & Associates
222 North Second Street
Minneapolis MN 55401
Gentlemen:
� PW93-032
1. Note minimum 18-in. vertical separation befinreen water and sewer lines p.
5 af 7.
2. Revise sheet 3 of 7 to show the correct inverts bf the pond outlet and
invert in the cantrol structure. Label pond as detention area.
Sincere{y yours,
Scott Erickson
Assistant Public Works Director
SE:cz
3Y '
C
.,_._., �.�, SP 4�93-01 - -----
.�.....,..� —„n,e� ---ar•rr•�
.....r..��....�.... � .. . .. �
r4erew�.Yw�w�4+ii �i�1' ��� ��/,ii►� � A
Nrw �us •JI�NSf10H klOIDG�S A3'101� �— � ; T_ � �
. wr�m �wvs - +au. � �a aa aAnwy � � _ � .
zctt•sc�•[io ..er� t�ee•ect-:rv ••i • �-orss .�a....�w •��•e••u.�w . .s..as o•ea•s r��ex ztx .
— '3'N 3f1N3htl 35I9
� �
� �
F U ° � � iiii Ri-• 4t K R�Ii�.11^''^�.1, Q�^. y - � •
Np NOfY1 N u hp M�i �� F T��ii-~'r
Q' SN ONNY] Q Z � '�h��� ��i � � e�i$1��� �j~
W�ru� F- �¢az Q� � sf'�' y�r ��� j a �1« �L+�� R
NH�zy°� U Y�NfvNi L]F- 4 � <��a6� �b � �� � g3� ^�5:3� ��
`a f W .!^. n ¢ '�- g
�¢� � r- z�x�� b q §� �A«�b 3 e� `��b �" �
Q' �O_fn� i ¢W �aP l7 J ba° �o�� Y �°� < Qp � ��! � Y. . � �
W �OW¢m 2 �1-Oa� ,Z„� H � ��.5k�'X����'��$a ����p�<'+� �`+�'��'�E€
a> a z g
Z y�maN V¢�-'^,Z� ZQ ��d�. ��g3'Aqi:� ti8 �1�i�€ �� k�
O 3OfN'1N�0 Q G1dN2�0 OI'- �uL� ������3 ~���a � �� � T3
� �
a
�
U
K
I
� t
� I
— Y
s
s
--------------�-
e
--� �
�''
; g I
� � I
_� ��;,—
� W `'
z
�
� � � � —_
W i
W �-
�
�,
� �
� I� �
� —6 �
�� _ i
I
— L-------
r
�
i
--.�-
��
T
�.m�.�-.
��� , '�
�i�.,.�� �1
�. � �
,,,11� ��
16 �
�� I ��' ,
' �I� ' ��7Gf
� �I 9�
I�
� �
�, -
� �
2
t� Q
O J
= J
c� 3
�
Uvl
a
ik�
aaa
���
���
333
�����
W �eeeg�
gg�g.
�
��� i
,
_
�r
�
�
z
��
� : 11
11 ��y~7 •;1MF
'Y��� �f•'8.€
� g��7 _:Y°.�.�£
�- °::::a�
.'^:� 58=10°8.
� eE?: °ggY.=2 ..
� Y7Y_ �:_ Y39 �
6 E.e85`F5 .R
� � 'i�sEs�FRgga e
C � Y. �� g`'�$g� �
� - E� � FE��: 5��::f`Y
}}� :S�'� F����^� 9
� •^"' � �$��« F .e. .
�i � � � g ��- :.� =
� � s���=
'I �• '�—
M �I( i
SP �F'93-01 s � .
Westminster ��rp; �` �;�' . � 0 `�'F,ry
1,�'�" O W
s • ...i U
: __ _�: �_ �; � �@ ii�iN � aW> ���
ii �� Etl! " r° � Jb �,i`a'!1_,,,;� �QW �
� i -. S'7 :� 0•. � ' �N
� ,: =°a : F�� v� 3d n�
�: ss: :: ,_a , '� _
r.�;..,h ;- _� �,: ��_ 13� � � o
_� �i =_; ��t �` z t� �
_i � . l,s �= a Z� v �� �i ,, _
l� �. ]�; SY= ��7 � Q�J. � ° �
� . . i: �
=3 (:t: st33, E�'s ��3 a Vi� �
ii E'� !�'�= �_' ��f . FO p � . :� .
�54 � ��J 'q �" � � °
;3 1 l5,= ��! �! (J.. T
�� .t` :��' �:� y � � p 4
�6 ::• �SR� �=j 3�! v T.q � . � - .
� ��� �,3 3��: �e� ��� � �A �
�c _° !:s e�3? � 33� v _ g
�� =t: �i� y4 � �� ; `
x ��ad ei: �5�� O =�a ` a_ a
! 71 3 m �� ;gf� ?
� ��� i�7 �� ! }
1: � � �Yj ��i GA� CJ 'i�� �
�� -S=
--�
— — --�
� I `,
M�� wll 4N�y Y��n1 1f
i�N 'w • �M w� • w� fw�Mir�
� ` '���f
\ i `
u
� / :.
J ��
'= T.
i _ I �
{
'\'_�.'"'_____ _ _._'___"____ ___�'�'` s
_' -� ��w ;p vn • ! �� �
. � (�
��� J
I
A
:��i:`
F�a€ee
o.•.eR
y3s�w �
I S
� w
•EEY[ �_
;F�ao �.
ir��r ��:.
E ° " �
_sr:: -�'a
-l:�-� ' ` _� _ ' i
.,._.,, —�,,,v„a.9 —�.� SP ��93-0
---......�:._ �::.:' `�"'°o -rsir•�
.........._....,......�...� �nava ivL.rans �n�rrS��s ar-i . , ; ' ' �
� - A�aui �o �ua � � � I�
Nvie ao�v�avea / orravu� tJNISf10H HOIN3S A3'i�li� i �I ., �
,� :-�;::; : � ;� ;
�.� �.� •� � •«� ,�,�„ I =_ �: � �
tsa�•e�a-:� r� :�xo•ecc�t�• •� �orss ��.�.•ov�w -�+•.�s ea.s r., iri .
,�... . ._.. , _._ . , ,.,.. .,...
SP ��93-01
, s^, s .. , ' , ', ,* -.�,.,.. � . � � 'We� tm.�,ia.n.��s org— � ,� ;
�-- ,...�
`�� ? �Lrw.�.��`wti11:�$I..i�yrifl.l� 3S'l/I1,7Md Tlld/1�1� M�ll�lT���llii ����� � �
� .
, a
- - .: . w..� _�_ . . II�I
.� :. � , u.r-NV�a pf�pStlpH �QIN�� iO a,��,,4�ij;,
�..� � .
. e. � i,
.±.:s•.,._ .. . . � ., ,.� :�- rr . :... . . � wu»,�s ' � , , . ,,,a n� *� '' I
_;`
.• ...:,y.2tj�LiS�f/n.I�.l.f •.�e�� i1iV-6iC•tIP'.'��1� •�-�����/.� .:•.�•
1 O 1 S f ' i i� i.�. M.� �� i • a e a � f V 1 � e N [ I t
t
—� r. W . °'k�yR-'��,V.i�t�' '� tJ6%�� 1 �
,�$ p �� ,.
T• F $ i` �+. ♦ • • � • •
.r��.�^ � .:�`�r�l�. y+►ws�� "� �
, r� .
� ' � 4„` � � � _ � � .r. ,.
, f, ^, ,a . "}
,� t �: � ?� '���*
r
. � } � . � �#,� �
� � � '� �- r �" 'r� r'•
w
#�• - j�„ .�`- � � '� � p �'}'�
a �S.ly q?�t'� � � � �� 'AC's; ,i��.� ��
� '""``.s s �� A" t"M?�� �! ��o�t� ` .r,; •3'N 3f1N3Atl }si9 , �' . _
tn ,{� �� 4 d {� c'i '? �. '� . . _
t � r ;� „ fi
w �' ? ��'""�'�-- ' °• -
ir c �' �§ '� . ' • {„Y� . . � _ . J � ,
h�v� � � i, � .. �a �� y�t• � . . . . 1���•• ��i �k ;��. K R
� g"�`�a � t � � �IC�i :. � . , � � t:
°n. i , 2 � .� . . ;7�� ; ��
t �" . . � ° �, i
� x�� � � _ � {
_ y
3 Fh. .. � � Y . . + �I
� �
O k '
� � ';a,'^ E
.:, ,. _ _ :
� .� -
� y_ �
i - � � � ,
' > ��, � � i � �
� g
-t �aN r
� �r(t �j' �� � �� �
'x y * ��f x'�1 � .�� ` ' �` � � � � ' `, • : '�r � .
. f
4 � f i� I
�. � 's.. �si' � 3 � �_ . . � . . �f �
i� c
, _: ° u
. _ � �_'•d 4C: x y _,
q. U 3 •
� �. �.1 � �, �� . �n . . � U N �;�Y .
�
' ,k YL R t �:��y i�: ' . .. e.l . . . � � ( .
�. � '� .�_ . . .;�
. -' t'e.� i ': ; ',r i � . .'.. - .
k; 4( a} �� f ; 9 -a-�• _ { �, �"__}
, �t� Yi� i►� y�p f � �
i °�, r � � � :-- i � �
, s � i � � �'�� �t :
"� r 'E x,� p�E"�s r �.,
���� .f Y i Y.' i .... .
►�� t� '}�Y,.�r'� � �,,Y`}+-e'R�{ 4"� .
a ; �iy`.f �y w" " 6'�� C 3°'� il�' t e�ti�;'. ? �y � � a �. . . .
; � .: � ?.. :.� YY i � . ... � � . J { V� . . , . . G�
. ;.� .M . - '..
.., .. -.. �r : � ... .. . . ! . ` .: r� .i O
� x.'.: ... . .. rt "_'__"_"_"__L."�'K'_' . � . 2'
'_"_
,' , �..: __.. ... � ., - W
,_ •.
� .E
,
�� ! fi' • g b% . `'i°�.� . .`..: _. �: -�_ - �� ] . .. F
,� �#Y., *h � � � ' � e i Z
. . ' �t•�} � �•z r -t I � �� , 4 ... � �
i �� � ° � '�" J � � 63 I � �
` :i � t < �� � � � � ~
�.i isw. .�i �� .,� i•� � . � �� f � . .. 6 i I + � .
s i� � 1 �y
a •f��si':�F � � . il � . c w ' . . _ - { ._.. _ .
x' �'� r � � �'- � t : � � � �$ ti� � �3 �
� __ '
. ,
�=
�
,
1
,
, �
.� �. ,., . i�� � Q
.t . t" ° � R . N .
'�S� `t 't)n) l��' W i ��' Ii � .
M � 8 : `:. � -� � � � . �' . a -.
� t �t t � . �y -�,� . .. � � � f;;.�, ,�.. . •_Z .
F t ' !r �k ����3 � c �� � ' � � '
a � � � 5 � . �... ' �. �i .�" . ,
, � � T+i �� a �t� � �,. � e •• , ' . • �
4 iY " 9 sT'��. _' . Y �.; i i�
a� : � ' - . ' ....,.. � ,
�� 1 �
. � g � E e �v f � `f� . �i�t ii���.i�ii������� "'� { �� _
E, 'o ._' . _ y �5.�, r; � � .; �, � �y� ��� _ .ti 4 =
s , + � ' �� + � ��—
F . ���„ , �.� i � --��iign��il��i��.�iii�i��ii •�` �' Y -, .; ` ; Q
�; 1; �� i t�e � i i t� i i i i i i��� � � 4
� ' � 3 � � T .Y�' � � � '.' .� - � LL �,� , Y�_ � Z
� ' � s: �, '. L_ =------- �.
` ' �; .�fm ,�+� r� 4 �!, , � ` �-r- -------------- — - . , %� ; s
y�ry, t j- ri
� t ! I _ F a ��'i� � i°t t �` � � � � .
�-'��" ' � a
'° �`� i�� "��.�,���� tt:1� } i, , s ` � � . _.
a s� ��.�li t .t,�w '_ �5 °+�'� � �
¢�' • � �' ", Y y •, r ` � � � . .
i�t' t f`°�:i� } _� 't f ' ; ��p, !
r � , t + � t d::< . . y �i �� y� . . .� . . � `�
� ' .� ' � f� � tT . 1 .., . i
� �
� .. � �y �
. g,
�.- � � : N i.{.� � . .
., � �'�, ... p �; s�:. � ?'). . _� �..,a . ' . .._-- � � -
r." ., , . . . . . . . .., , ., - .,... .
. , a . , . ,. , ` . �..... .. . . :. ...,_.....».. . .. .
... . _. -.. . . .. . . _
~ u"{� � � - . A,��� . , �
�
' ,l .
7 N I 21
S 3 1 b�
3 N, I.'J N 3
i {� S S b'
N� I,S 3 4 21 O I 21 3.L N
'S 213.LS(.�d SO
�
I 3 21 ft l J 3 1 I H J 21 H„
O 21 �I N d W 21 d O 9
■■
----- : � ,„..,� .� .ti ..--
— -- ___ _ �. �,,;--
'W�++. �� `�:+.r www� �
— ^�
— «�
� _ � e � . f .=-... � - . � :�...
�
���',�� °''' �,y � � � , ,v
.. ::. � '� '
� ----+--,
P� a
� e
� r
� � �� � #s;� � � � ��`� .
� � � 3 �' p
� ';� ����� ` ,��
_ ____ �� � _ �
` ��
� �: :;..
�.:.: �
�P #7�
�� ���
s � � � '� ��� : � -�� •' ��; , ,
� � �
ci _�1 � �'� '
_ .� .' �°
4� .
_ l
���
�� j I
� �
�
I
�
� I
� _�— I
I
`'7 �--L.,.. . I
�—{ _. .,_ ���
�
J
�
� �¢ .�
4 � � � �� �
� r , Y ;:,�� �
�efi tp ��M�'��� `� i � +�y 'ag ';� Sq�,��� ' .
';� , i � z,{.:� '�,k-'" _.r..__._ I
:
.9'y k 4'� _ . � :� d �
: ♦
�f . '� � i_ ... ' "l,":,. p+' °�
`'� re. -
't��� �� _
{
� r_
� � ��
,� _ .
;
, ;
� �:
. .. �
�, �
.. .;
�>;
�
z�
lf N
. . � . � ,.._ "'__..._...��� `� �
� T:: j 4
� ,
�� r�� . ,� �% �, �
��;
�Ar� �i�/� t ��. ? d�H��. .i
t .
%'.� .
� �? t:
•7 4 �� � -
��� � �
r ��
, ��� s .�
�, ; ''� ; ; �"�
,. s_ �; � ,
� ; . � �—`'�'� r; :
� ��� ,�; t}�
�N, � ,� � ; �a
, , a�t' �,,;.
,, r: � � i.:
� k:
:, t � `�� �
8 a `; �Z �
+� ; m �` �, � ,�1,£ q
'8' ��� , `� ��,� �,
.'t t �s .y^i � . �y.
v'.�"'.�Y ���. Y � . �:'?:- : .T=3'� '
a . Y� ' �' . . -
�'�� X� �k��
¢ i {y4
�. y��� ���� � 4{�
x' t
"��i:S_ r .�.
.. •� , �� :��:
�
.. ...� ';. .' . . �...a–.. ....,.:� - :3
, _�
t;.
, :������
� _
_ — — � ±i� i5 � .
� s
� !";�� .. " � �
'J N I 21 ' 3 N 1 7 N 3 N'J I S 3 d 21 O f 21 3 1 Pv I .i 21 ( i 1� 3 1! H J 21 V
S3.Lb'I�,t�SSb' '8 2131S1�� SOt�`�i:�lNdW21d09
�
�
■■
�
i
■■
■
■
■ ■u ■
■■
. . , . �'}�`�%"t' �y` .,_j .r/�....
�
SP 4�93-01 �
';,M�„' io rr� -�-+a � � � �� �
-----�..e.a
Westminst o
� rw w�.r..www.� .. . . . ib'���i "�, � �- -.-:: � � !�
uoy.,yy � � r111NIBfIS M3U1a111/1l'ld 3114 �� � p;
. StKW tl0pr1� �1Si1OH �iIN� iD AL7 �� �
' I i
+�� � � �'��l'Y"�'�':'-: i �
�u�s ,au ,� � �_.:;_
�� .,H . �+�m�w � , . _ ._ , -i �
�� 2f[f-6[[-j19 eVJ.[1(9•6[f•210 •1 IOtff �e��• IW e0ra�u1W , _.-.. •
�� i��w � !f Ou �ai V��oy Zj=
2
J
��
�a
�S
0
u�
b
��
�i
i�
a
°o
rc
�4
z'^
im
��" "� V V �
� y
� I W
`- -------�
= O
�� � � �
,
o� �y � �
,
oa� �� �
�
F�� o^ �
� �
o�Q �
0 0,
� '___"_J
1
� � u � o
II I
�����
�
i ! �
�I'n • {1 I II
����
� � .
II�n
;
II �:��c�
�
r �
�
I
Community Development Departmen�
P � D�SION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 25, 1993 ��
TO: William Burns, City Manager �`
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Resolution Approving a Lot Split Request, L.S.
#93-01, by Westminster Corporation
Attached please find the above-referenced staff report. The
Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval of the request
to the City Counc`il with the iollowing stipu].ations recommended by
staff:
1. The petitioner shal'1 execute and record an open air easement
to provide an additional 4, 830 square feet of land area on the
St. WilTiam's parcel. The proposed easement language shall
be reviewed by the City.Attorney prior to execution of the
easement. �
2. The surveyor shall submit the legal description for the
remaining St. William's parcel prior to submission of the
resolution for City Council appro�al. �
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action and approve the attached resolution approving the
lot split.
rII�i/dn
M-93-87
RESOLUTION NO. '- 1993
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT,
L:S. #93-01, TO CREATE TWO SEPARATE PARCELS
GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF 61ST AVENUE AND WEST
OF 5TH STREET
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at their
, 1993 meeting; and the Planning Commission
stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, such approval was to create two separate parcels from the
Norwood Addition to Fridley Park plat and Lot 5, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 59, to be described as fo'�lows:
Parcel A: Lots one to sixteen (1-16), inclusive in Block One (1);
and Lots one and thirty, in Block Two (2), Norwood Addition to
Fri.dley Park, according to the duly recorded plat thereof.
That part of vacated Kent St. (now known as 62nd Ave.), dedicated
in the plat of "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lying between
the northerly extensions of the east and west lines of Block 2,
said plat.
That part of vacated 5th Ave. (now known as 4th Street), dedicated
in the plat of "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lyinq between
the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 30, Block 2, said
plat, and the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 16, Bloek
1, said plat.
That part of the vacated alley in Block 1, ��Norwood Addition to
Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the north
line of Lot l, Block l and the westerly extension of the south line
of Lot 8, Block 1.
That part of the vacated alley in Block 2, "Norwood Addition to
Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the north
line of Lot 1, said Block 2, and the westerly extension of the
south line of Lot 1, said Block 2.
Parcel B: A1.1 of Lots 2 through 29, inclusive in Block Two (2),
�
Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", according to the duly recorded
plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.
That part of vacated 5th Ave. (now known as 4th Street), dedicated
in the plat of "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lying between
the westerly extensio;��. of tl����sou��°:°�rir���f Lot 16, Block 2, said
plat, and the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 29, Block
2, said plat.
311
� Resolution No. - 1993 -
Page 2
That part of the vacated alley in Block 2, "Norwood Addition to
F'ridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the north
line of Lot 2, Block 2 and the westerly extension of the south line
of Lot 15, said Block 2.
Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 59, Anoka County, Minnesota.
Except the South 180 feet of the West 183 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 30, Range
24, Anoka County, Minnesota. And except that part of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14, described as
commencing at the Southwest corner thereof; thence Northerly along
the West line thereof 30 feet; thence Easterly parallel with the
'��' South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of �x .
said Section 14, a distance of 127.22 feet; thence Northeasterly
on a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 20 feet,_a
distance of 31.22 feet; thence Northerly, tangent left having a
radius of 20 feet, a distance of 31.22 feet; thence Northerly,
tangent to -the last described curve, a distance of 1U0.96 feet;
thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the left, having a
radius of 45 feet, a distance of 31.99 feet to the North line of
the South 180 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of said Section 14, said point being the point of beginning
of the tract to be described; thence continuing Northwesterly along
the last described curve, a distance of 16.7 feet; thence
Northwesterly tangent to the last described curve 56.94 feet;
thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the right having a
radius of 175 feet, a distance of 53.71 feet to its intersection.
with a line parallel with and 30 feet East of the West line of the
Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14;
thence Southerly along said line parallel with and 30 feet East of
' the West line of said Southeast Quarfier of the Southwest Quarter,
� to the North line of the South 180 feet of said Southeast Quarter
of the Southwest Quarter; thence Easterly along the North line of
said South 180 feet to the actual point of beginning. And except
that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said
Section 14, described as commencing at the Southwest corner
thereof; thence Northerly along the West line thereof 30 feet;
thence Easterly parallel with the South line of the Southeast
� Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14, a distance of
127.22 feet; thence Northeasterly on a tangential curve to the left
� having a radius of 20 feet, a distance of 31.22 feet; thence
Northerly tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 100.96
feet; thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the left having
a radius of 45 feet, a distance of 48.69 feet; thence Northwesterly
tangent to the last described curve 56.94 feet; thence
�.�-�•,•;�,�.�� Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the right having -�:rad��,:�.,�.���
� of 175 feet, a distance of 53.71 feet to the East line of the West
30 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said
� Section 14, said point of intersection being the actual point of
; beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing
3JJ
Resolution No. =�1993
Page 3
Northwesterly along said curve having a radius of 175 feet, a
distance of 23 feet to the East line of the West 15 feet of said
Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Southerly along
said East line to the intersection with the North line of the South
30 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence
Easterly along a line parallel with and 30 feet North of the South
line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance
of 15 feet to the East line of the West 30 feet of said Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Northerly along the East
line of the West 30 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter to the actual point of beginning. Subject to road right-
of-ways on 61st Avenue N.E. and the East frontage road of State
Highway No. 47 (University Avenue).
WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey
from the owner; and
WHEREAS, such approval will create two separate parcels from the
Norwood Addition to Fridley Park plat and Lot 5, Auditor's
5ubdivision No. 59.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the
petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County within six
months of this approval or else such approval shall be null and
void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE'CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1993.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
3KK
- EXHIBIT A
Resolution No. - 1993
Page 4
l. The petitioner shall execute and record an open air easement
to provide an additional 4,830 square feet of land area on the
St. William's parcel. The proposed easement language shall
be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution of the
easement.
2. The surveyor shall submit the legal description for the
remaining St. William's parcel prior to submission of the
resolution for City Council apprc�val.
3LL
REQUEST
Permit Number
Applicant
Proposed
Request
Location
SITE DATA
Size
Density
Present Zoning
Present Land Use(s)
Adjacent
Zoning
Adjacent Land Use(s)
Utilities
Park Dedication
Watershed District
ANALYSIS
Financial tmplications
Conformance to the
Comprehensive P1an
Compatibility with Adjacent
Zoning and Uses
Environmental
ConsideratiorTs
RECOMMENDA�ION
Appeals Commission
Planning Commission
Author �/dn
S TAFF REP O RT
Community Development Department � I
Appeals Commission Date �
Plamm�g Commission Date : February Z4: , 1993 ,
City Council Date : March :l , 1993 ;
L.S. 4�93-0]
Westminster Corporation
To create a separate development parcel.
6200 - Sth Street N.E.
122,669.86 square feet
C-3, General Shopping and R-2, Two Family Dwelling
Vacant
C-3, General Shopping to the west; R-2, Two Family Dwelling
to the south and north; R-1, Single Family to the east.
Six Cities
Approval wiCh stipulations
Approval with stipulations
, .. _ ''k::' .-' _
- S �/� �� SEC
C/TY
L.S. ��93-01
Westminster Corp.
. i4 r. 3o R.24
OF FR/OL EY
'i ;
' 31 J 4 I
J; U�: �� i= ;;� � �
� ° - - r ---�"-dAHPFT ,�K_w .Kt;. B�T.,iit6FFVYAY-• •—�;:o�-f�T���— -------- - - - ..
'!; � , ; , ; Y � . .} "_; -' : • _ , ;i+; . s e�, �`' tu . ia M, � ^l� '� `�, ,
'�` �r-- : s,'..✓ 1 -- 2---- -~' � � . `�y�
�• � . � , . �. # .� ' �It'�pG `Ai��`�� �:\:' ''.: 'f E � ' „ I
� �,•y, a � - � i � 3 � e t - � , s � .. , a.�. f � �. � �' � m , _:_
� --- i y � � � 4 EY � 2 ; � : �� - : � . �a - . � i� � o^ :,� �;r) �a ; ; �
- , Y, � p = s � P = ,.�� � H �
,, _ , �R I � s:� t �: _ . - �'r ;
----'1--. -J�: y'•: 7 ��s ;, � �� �' �� �r. �t��,z ", : -- v;
� ' r� �+�6-�1��_�� f T - -- �V @�NNETT v i
'•� �� �� '�.- •' �I �� ;W �lM� .. �.��� `�'wa r �
---� h --- - r � "' � / . :�1�' � ,� j � � _ ., . _•' ".:r� �, ,,,;., tJ'°'` "''f ~ `
.- p,� ,� --. '; � o e� ie � •,; I F � � s�a � .., �F � y,, �
� :: u ✓�.��' ��-� . �' �_ �= R' � � �' _ „:
Q�' ---- ; e . �. ,, �p Z A i �Q��}� 4a - �� - v, H : :'
.. _ ----- =: � � %i P ,s � � A!_/CE � vII ' p „ r + : r f •',. . � : M.�
' �ANE..:- --�` ;; ' a. _ �pG ✓�! � nl�, - �� '-
rcn"' '�u aF URMIE � . e .j\i• / r// .c !� • •r' r •', 'f�. ,a ,M � �
= 1,T .� �,a'; 12 rs' ' � ..� , -��ri� ' _ .� �, , � K�� � ,�� yi a . F . + y� r� _ `� .
G � � � M �, � A' ',' l _ t1' ^�' `r�R
J I " - ,. Q�/ lk1O/ � ,. 't`� r .. �r,a .r i
� ,�;,� •.f, z; ;� ,.:., Q,_ ... 4 ` 'r'�,T.'..� •' i � r , it' �. _ � .f..
r. , . p: 's+�- : Z r., t� -
.,`_ � C NTE 2 � �j� � � ' .;
:r•� f' � E - �, < <. � � �1�t ? ,t`. .f' � : i • f�, 'S�1 ' a l+�a 0 � H� . z R:
.ORIVE ` ' � ..,,.., ` . ` .,
�u� ��'' ?. �� s.,qsrk ^ ~ f � so .M �a � � -�, r` � iek>> N w . '*' i 3 '�,r �ql. W . M�.: lA , ' � ..
' � 'r `- ' °' ..,. . • �.-. � rt n ti :o n ,e � , . : . ..
t ;�' ,..'.I ,.. �C �7,�1 '}l='0�� �` 'p'•k':i. � ,�' �*�u R I,.'•�
�_•r•. . '? � � , � . �i t. t . � � � ' � ` � ` 63 R.Q ... ��
a �_ - AUDE ORS _ � -% °, ; `t ` i :i� � r� i e' ��� c �p� �r` M: ,• �n ,,a �r� _,rt
--�t�'1�—i�C?: _i..; . � 1 ,j�:���Ll• �s� i- � �, • ��',i .ti .�p I te .
: i � � — -nrrl-' -- . �`� ... . . ,.
��•' •��•} �: 3 ' �. � �s � : '•� �� � ' 1 � *' � a 'i� ♦ i (LM: • w • � X. •,� „
. . �°� / � ��y- • . tni � \ • � •/ tr .
�. • __�d —__ G.`G . '1�(� ; �i+ ;1'i i � . Y� �. i } F� y �• � � �.
,l� %:° ��V,�
"'SUB IVISIO i � N
, � , ^.
• �tS
DRIVE : I
,. , . � N
c�� -c1� n��
;� - ,
. ,
rr "� ;�
� ��
DRIVE�� �
'' � L I
„ ," l � (asol i
K' '
' h�i � �ANE , I� . I
. J ie '� •�
�1- i� �' U �;�:�
� ,p '— . r-::
� "' � :+.
1 r---�
_. _ � . �, • r'�. 3; ' y�
," i
o) ys •E 'r,. � 7'. _ . ,:
0.59 •�. .yn -Zt;
.� i,. •r
i� ':,�� . �'e ; , aQ :�no,
,,, ,,,r C��, W • � :n
� � � ? _ ; rq ,,.+ W . .� „�
/, � �� `•� r �= 'Nl. a�o
, 62•ND.; • AVE. �, r„ J,,,•. C �
� � �l +,J ' _ • ��4 .6�.,
° , w =. Jk ,,, � � • .- p:
� �' „� ,:, � ; �; Q .�.�
V - � �
� �Y
, " . M.. ` t��> �..
5 Mp �
� "� ' : �r„ �+'. N;
� • ��a V�„ � a�,.
H .. ��
• � `� J y� �
. �- " �,,
' r:. a �+'d •
:.y . �,''�'�r� ..9 .
-- "`' _i= • �,. ,'
;�s°�•�
r—, r---� r----, � `
�
� � ��� ��� t
�■ � ��y �Sai ■
� � �C�� �1�
�.� �!!,'� �;�! ■
��'�il l�m�'� ����
0� ���1�����
�i � i� �C� ��i0
�■ � fE� � ��� ■
�. !!1� �� o oi��l
� ��� ■e� � w�a��
�� ���i � ��J�
I �
� • � � � � .
� ' �r� ���
��,0 �#�� �i��
��0 !�� �1����i��
d�sol Ols�� ��6�� ■
�•�� �°� �;�� �
�Jiil7i !li::� Eti�►�T� F
����� , �S� . l3�=�`i1 /
�i� ., i����r,�@yi�i� �
0�� �11��:,�,� �J�i� " �
�:�E� �=�i�;�I��!J�� '
�dal�� ' ��t;�;�'-�� is ' 1
rm■;� �•a � r�f� r
�' A�;f�i1 �1��� E��il�
' � .
_L
1�1
OCATION MAP
i
5 a .
•
� �
� j � ,
k
�f
i
6
1 I F- �
t171:
_���e�_.•*•.����
.
������� ��� I
t►�`v �����? � ���� �
,�?��o�� �.
���5���� ►5�����
<o�����
P,ve ♦�►�O>
v����►��♦
�1����►�1�1�!
.�.�����`O,Q.�,,�6
. �•�•5,�,
" � : ♦���
�. •
��
�D.���.
�
. Q����
� �9�
����
������
^' �
��
�
t a,
� ��f�:i - —/' �MI
} �
. � .. �� � _� ' R �,.
1 f � � . • �'���
. � , "�r ��
� �
/ • .l 1 I -
�� �� • � I : �--
� � l t .
�
� � �c
,<
L.S. �t93-01
Westminster Corp.
,� ` 'j �• _ - 6 "• �
., � , 1 � �
>
/ \� \h 9 4 iY 3 Z � • 8
.c �' �� y
c�,'� � , .
B� .a �? �b � 2',3 A -
, � � , �- _
,0��1 1, �
7 J
` � • �� 6 � / '.
� �� � � � z
� y � .r ,B ,
. �. ; . ;
4 � �� j � 4.
� 2 , ie i� %� Q I
`t�ti d � .7 � i,s 1
C�,p ^ l� ' ` 4 / �� �* � 1 4 �
' i F .� ° � . TERRA ,� � 3 s
.� � � P !�c _a��'�" .a � 4ia c e • i
3 � � N �` � � �K�C �� � � ,
� �� - � -
S L.� Bt! f 1 3 2! 8`7 G S 4 3 !c s b � 9 ��o
u ,
i
3�: 6 7 91�',a!/Zi��/Efk?Sf /.' /i�9 B 7 6 f�4 3�2�� ,f�.f�.9��/ /1
i
� /
c v �
f' �
� , „ ,a �p I � � � 3 � � F s 4 � z �'��; �A1 �F�S�v' �% �4
H. AVENUE. N. . � �,i `W' y� �W' !.; 3 �
tir
,� A� : � ,s f!, F �, s 6 f .:3��p� � ,
' ' �— �-�
� REEx : r��R� ,a�� �-�� 6 � � �p4 3 �� s
9 0 � c.s>s;3.z i ; 9
�^_. . � ' � .
-- -- —'�1SS6�s�co� ___. _. . . _ _ —_ �T
�.�. . �. � /
`��'.�`�''-i •�'�'=%� , _� r4' - 9 P 7 c T . ��� �
:.'•::, -!• �:� .. � : 3
�•�• • :•" . .,
Z
:�� 751 • J• , o- po 3 �s �c �7 �! �9 1� 2� ?1 I3 1s S 4
::�;. �.�;. iE
1.;.��. �:��� /3
:;�;.r.,� r.: 'F w�4 ,e ,, �z
•:;:: f::l�:•: T •�Y'" 8 � la � ze � zo i is !
�.<:,.•��:Cj' ...
.. :i• ��`� �, • • • 9 � i9 1 /9 2 /9 .2 � iY
� ih��ti��`• � � • :B
t'• : ��S`�l:�i^,��'� • • • �O 10 .7 1 r1 � �/ ! /� � /
, ;.,..•� �; . . t� 11 .c 3 n � � * i7 � � i�
,: - �, , e r
,. a� � 5l9 eo • I 2 �s k n f ic s is
,�% ' ' :, •• 13 y c .r G /f c ii
,�,75� ,:�.•i:%• �•�•�•�•� 14 i G /f 9 H 7 ,�¢ 7 /J
-- ���-: ,•.•.•:r. �5 �
� • • • �1 7 i3 B �3 B /3 J /1
-- 16 � ii d i� 9 n � i� � /�
(38 2 1 1918 �7 ie ,f ,1� ie � �e /� /� � ��
. N.E.
3! . l / yp Ii �1- Zi �� ./9 /I �7 /s J/I 1 u i� � p 9
37 1 1 2 - -
ft 3 i � � � _
3r 4 4 � 4� �
J s �-,'� � i
�
� G �` �n. � � ��i � I
7 7 t<, �`.�.' �<<.
Ji d D � � :
� � , �". �� � �::�
v �. ,- .'�f R�D C� E"r �
,;. ti . � 4:;1'�, � �'- `� FRI�LEY
� �Z:.
� •j i n �,- �_ � � � � MIDD
� : � � �
/f � �. J �
/t il
� � • `
f /� /i
�� �� ("'� � �
/7 iJ �.• ,
2i i/ i� �3 €. d"7 : �j
!o /J ; } ,/ -. �� � T
ZONING MAP
, �:.: -:..
Staff Report
L.S. #93-01, by Westminster Corporation
Page 2
RE4UEST
The petitioner requests that a lot split be approved in order to
create a separate parcel for a proposed three story elderly housing
project. The petitioner is also processing a special use permit
request to allow elderly housing in the R-3, General Multiple
Family Dwelling district. �
SITE
The property is vacant and is located between 5th Street N.E. and
$F��� Moon Plaza, north of St. William's Church administrative building. #„A
The property is currently zoned R-2, Two Family Dwelling, and C-3,
General Shopping Center District. In 1989, the City Council held
the first reading of a� rezoning, to rezone the subject parcel to
R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling. Adjacent parcels are zoned
C-3, General Shopping Center District to the south and west, R-2,
Two Family Dwelling to the north, and R-1, Single Family Dwelling
to the east.
The City Council approved the ordinance rezoning the property to
R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling for first reading on March
20, 1989. Second and final reading will occur along with the lot
split and special use permit.
Historv
In 1988, the Community Development Corporation proposed to
construct a 70 unit, three story elderly high-rise with underground
parking. The project was comprised of 50 one-bedroom and 20 two-
bedroom units. The exterior treatment was proposed to be brick,
siding, and stucco. At that time, the proiect was not constructed
due to a lack of available funding.
ANALYSIS
Westminster Corporation, which is a subsidiary of the Community
Development Corporation, has recently received confirmation of
Section 202 federal funding to construct a new elderly housing
project. The current proposal is a three story, 50 unit, low and
moderate income elderly and handicapped facility. The project does
not have underground parking or garages. The exterior is proposed
to be brick. A comparison of the 1988 and 1992 projects is
provided as Appendix A.
The proposed development parcel meets the minimum lot width
requirement; however, is short 4,830 square feet of the minimum Iot
area required for the proposed project. Based on the number of
units (51), the code requires an average of 2,500 square feet of
3PP
Sta�f Report
L.S. #93-01, by Westminster Corporation
Page 3
land area per unit. This calculates to 127,500 square feet. The
proposed development parcel is 122,670 square feet in area. The
petitioners intend to execute an open air easement with St.
William's Church on the adjacent church property to meet the
minimum lot area requirements. The open air easement was approved
with the original lot split application in 1988. At that time, the
minimum lot area was short by 37,600 square feet. The proposed
easement was not drafted at that time; however, the City Attorney
should review any easement language prior to the execution of the
easement.
The pe��itioner's surveyor has submitted the legal description for
the development parcel, but has not submitted a legal description
for the remaining St. William's parcel. This will be required to
be submitted prior to the City Council approving the lot split.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission reaommend approval
�af the request to the City Council with the following stipulations:
l. The petitioner shall execute and record an open air easement
to provide an additional 4,830 sr�uare feet of land area on the
St. William's parcel. The proposed easement language shall
be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution of the
easement.
2. The surveyor shall submit the legal description for the
remaining St. William's parcel prior to submission of the
resolution for City Council approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning Commission voted 5-1 to
request to the City Council with the
by staff.
Citv Council Recommendation
recommend approval of the
stipulations as recommended
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
3C�Q
,�
PLANI�IING COMMISSION MESTING. FEB�1'#1�RY" 2�4. 1993 . - PAG]3 11
4. The applicant shall record restrictive covenants a ainst
the property which dictate that the project is or the
elderly and handicapped only; elderly define as those
persons 62 years of age and over, and ha icapped as
defined in Section 202 regulations. The venants shall
be consistent with Section 202 re ations, and if
Section 202 regulations are amended, id covenants shall
be amended with the mutual cons t of the City of
Fridley. The covenants shall be ' effect for a minimum
of 40 years and longer if the 1 s allows. The covenants
shall be reviewed and approve by the City Attorney prior
to recording.
5. Lot split request, L.S,/#9��-01, shall be approved.
6. The exterior of e building shall be of all-brick
construction.
Ms. Modig stated she i concerned about stipulation �6. She did
not want to create a meframe problem for the developer.
Ms. Sherek stated at.if the all-brick exterior is not acceptable
to HUD, and th petitioner has to revise the proposal for the
exterior for b ick and steel siding, she did not believe it would
be necessary for the petitioner to come back before the Planning
Commission and the petitioner could go directly to the City
Council.
The Cq�iimission members agreed.
A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON�NEWMAN DECLARED THE
�N CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
3. CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT RE4UEST. L.S. #93-01, BY
WESTMINSTER CORPORATION:
To create a separate parcel from the Norwood Addition to
Fridley Park plat, to be described as Lots 1-16, Block l, and
Lots 1 and 30, Block 2, Norwood Addition to Fridley Park,
together with vacated streets and alleys. The site totals
127,505 square feet and is generally located north and east
of St. Williams Church abutting 5th Street N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to open the informal
public hearing.
IIPON A VOICB VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE,_ CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED A� THE �FOR1�A���`sC HEARING OPEN AT 9:20 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the third and last land use request is for a
lot split. Currently, the proposed development parcel is under
the ownership of the St. William's Church and is considered part
3RR
PLANNING COMMIB$ION MEETING, FBBRIIARY 24�9:93:� PAGB 12
of the entire property. The lot split request is to create a
separate development parcel which will then be conveyed to
Westminster Corporation to construct the proposed building.
Ms. McPherson stated that as mentioned earlier in the special use
permit discussion, the proposed development parcel does meet the
minimum lot width requirement; however, it is 4,830 square feet
short of the minimum lot area requirement. Again, the minimum lot
area is calculated by multiplying the number of units (51) by the
average square footage required in the code, which is 2,500 square
feet of land area per unit. This calculates to 127,500 square
feet, and the proposed development parcel is 122,670 square feet.
To rectify the shortfall, the petitioner has proposed to execute
and record against the church property an open air easement to
create this 4,830 square feet. This easem��it is proposed to be
located along the soutii property line of the proposed development
parcel.
Ms. McPherson stated that in 1988, this resolution of lack of lot
area was posed for an open air easement totalling 37,600 square
feet. A proposed easement was not drafted at that time; however,
staff is recommending that if the project is approved with the
easement to be r.equired, the language be reviewed by the City
Attorney prior to the execution of the easement.
Ms. McPherson stated the surveyor has submitted the leqal
description for the proposed development parcel; however, in order
to execute the resolution approving the lot split, the surveyor
will also be reguired to submit the legal descriptions for the
remaining St. William's Church property.
Ms. McPherson stated staff is recommending that the Planning
Commission recommend approval of the lot split request to the City
Council with the following two stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall execute and record an open air
easement to provide an additional 4,830 square feet of
land area on the St. William's parcel. The proposed
easement Ianguage shall be reviewed by the City Attorney
prior to execution of the easement.
2. The surveyor shall submit the legal description for the
remaining St. William's parcel prior to submission of
the resolution for City Council approval.
Mr. Newman asked how far the property line•would have to be moved
to avoid the need for an easement.
u. � �..;� �•.�y
Ms. McPherson stated the property line would have to be moved
approximately 15.8 feet.
Mr. Newman asked if staff has discussed this with the petitioner.
3SS
:� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 24. 1993 PAGE 13 _�--
Ms. McPherson stated staff did discuss the fact that a relatively
minor amount of movement of the lot line would be needed in order
to meet the minimum lot area requirement.- The petitioner told
staff they would discuss this issue with St. William's. She did
not know the results of that discussion.
Mr. Prentice stated regarding the question of whether they could
handle this additional parcel by sale rather than by easement, when
staff raised that question, he discussed it with members of St.
William's Church. What Westminster has available in the
development to provide to the church from HUD is the amount that
they have agreed on with the church. They do not have the leeway
in their development financing proforma to add an additional amount
��r land at this time. The church members felt that if they were,
to sell extra land, they would like to get some extra money for
that land. When they knew Westminster could not provide that extra
money, the church members agreed to just leave the land sale and
proceed with the easement.
Mr. Newman asked where-the open_air easement begins..
Ms. McPherson stated that the original lot split request in 1988
was approved with the easement making up the easement of the 37,000
square feet, but it never got to the stage of drafting the language
for the easement.
Ms. Dacy stated it was her understanding that this open.air
easement option was discussed with Westminster at that time, and
it was very similar in nature to an easement that, for example,
the Building Code would require if there is a certain type of
construction and there has to be 60 feet of clear space around the
building. That issue came up when Wal-Mart was proposing to build
just north of Sam's Club prior to Wal-Mart moving to the 85th
Avenue site. It was her understanding that the open air easement
starts at the surface and goes up into the air to preserve that
extra area.
Mr. Newman stated he is concerned about this. It appears that by
approving this request, the City would be creating a lot that would
be nonconforming right away, and he did not see any physical
reasons why that property line cannot be extended. For all
practical purposes, the_apartment building is going to have access
to that property.
Mr. Saefke stated that is correct. He stated what they use for a
church facility right now was originally designed to be an
�-,�~�� °��:.�;�;;�;�diforium for a church/school complex, and there is no �velop�t _.�..��
in process or even contemplated for that property behind the church
and administration center. Part of this lot they are willing to
sell to Westminster Corporation was part of the church/school
facility as recreation area. Nothing has ever been done with that
3TT
�
PLANNIN(� COMMISSION M�'"FIN(�: FEBRIIARY �4, 1993 PAG$ 14
property. The parish council really saw no need to encroach any
further on what would be considered in the future St. William's
Church property as opposed to this development property. The
easement is sufficient for the Church's needs. It is also his
understanding they have an agreement for sale with Westminster on
this property, and the Church is selling the property at less than
its assessed value. Because of the restrictions on HUD funding for
the purchase of.the property, St. William's feels that at this
time, they have kind of given away a-certain portion of property
as it is, and they cannot afford to give away any more property
except through an easement.
Mr. Terry Mickley, 241 Rice Creek Terrace, stated that he a member
of St. William's and a liaison with the developer of the building.
He stated that if St. Wi1�-�am's deeds the property to Westminster,
then it is possible that Westminster could build within 5 feet of
the lot line which m-ight encroach upon St. William's Church
property. As stated by Mr. Saefke, the property will change hands
at considerably less than market value; and even though an easement
on that piece of property, it does give them some control on what
happens close to the border line. The property is still owned by
St. William's which is an asset in maintaining some control over
that 15 feet of land.
Mr. Dacy stated the Commission's job
not this approach is appropriate.
establish some criteria about the
easement, that is fine. The overall
the multiple family dwelling, and it
easement is not to be built upon and
as part of the lot area and if it is
Westminster Corporation.
is to determinc whether ar
If the Commission wants to
language in the open air
purpose is for the area for
may be appropriate that the
to be used as a calculation
not deeded in title over to
Mr. Kondrick stated that the way the property is, it cannot be
built upon because it is not Westminster's property. So, the
property is essentially dead because Westminster cannot build on
it nor can St. William's.
Ms. Dacy stated they are talking about the form of conveyance--an
easement versus fee simple.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Modig, to close the informal
public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NFWMAN DECI�ARED THE
MOTION CARRIED AND THE INFORMAL PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 1OS00 P.M.
Mr. Ii�ndricl�;:��tatec�p�3t�ia;�.;.:�as long as both parties are in agreement
with this, then he would be willing to vote to recommend approval
of the lot split.
Ms. Modig agreed.
3UU =
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 24, 1993 .-�-�:� .: -P�1GL I5
Ms. Sherek also agreed. She could see the points of both the
Church and Westminster.
MOTION by Ms. Sherek, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend to City
Council approval of lot split, L.S. #93-01, by Westminster
Corporation, to create a separate parcel from the Norwood Addition
to Fridley Park plat, to be described as Lots 2-16, BZock Z, and
Lots 1 and 30, Block 2, Norwood Addition to Fridley Park, together
with vacated streets and alleys. The site totals 127,505 square
feet and is generally located north and east of St. Williams Church
abutting 5th Street N.E., with the following stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall execute and record an open air
easement to provide an additional 4,830 squar� feet of
land area on the St. Wi:lliam's parcel. The proposed
easement language shall be reviewed by the City Attorney
prior to execution of the easement.
2. The surveyor shall submit the legal description for the.
remaining St. William's parcel prior to submission of
the resolution for City Council approval.
Mr. Newman stated he wouZd vote to recommend denial of the lot
split request. Although he.believes this is a great project, he
is very concerned about the precedent the City will be setting in
creating a nonconforming lot simply because the sellers would not
get paid and the buyers do not want or cannot buy the property.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, NEWMAN VOTING NAY, CHAIRPBRSON NSWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 5-1.
Ms. McPherson stated both the special use pernait request and the
lot split request will go to City Council on March l, 1993.
3vv
r
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSTI'Y AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
�
�
(612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LOT SPLIT APPLICATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached
Address: _ 62xx Fifth Street Northeast �(,���� �,����� �
�
Property Identification Number {PIN)
Legal description: see attached •
Lot Block Tract/Addition
Current zoning: R2/c3 Squaze footage/acreage
Reason for lot split: To allow for cons�ruction of a 3 story residential .structure.
Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license?
Yes No XX If yes, which city?
If yes, what type of business?
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes �o
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing)
NAME Church of St. �William
ADDRESS 61st Avenue Northeast 8� University Avenue Northeast
Fridl
SIGNATURE
,
NAME Flestminster Corporation
ADDRESS 328 Kellogg Boulevard West
St. Paul, hIlV 55102
SIGNATURE
DAYTIME PHONE
571-5600
/2, t qa�
DAYTIME PHONE 291-1750
DATE 1 / 12 / 93
Lnarles w. Yrentice, Project Manager
. r..,'.., w.,..,. ��..,..,. _,.,,�,..„.,,.,..... �., .,. �
��
Fee: $100.00 v
Peimit L.S. # -�1 �� � Receipt # 1 I D
Application received by:
Scheduled Planning Commission date: ,P ,�,j C� , l �% �'.�
Scheduled City Council date: _
3WW
0
S.t i't�� _ __ .
SURVEYfNG S�RViCES IN�.
Proposed OPEN AIR EASEFI�NT
An Easen�ent over dnd across that pari of Lats 2 and 29, Biock 2,
NORWOOD ADDITION 70 FRIDI.EY PARK, a�ccarding ta the r�carded pl�t
thereof, Anoka Cvunty, Minnesota, and tha��� part of Vacated 5iH
Avenue and that part of Yacated Alley within and adjoining sa�id
Block 2, described as foliows:
8eginning at tha nartheast corner af said Lo� 2; thence �
S 0°16'56"W an an a�ssumed bearing aiong t�e east �ine
af said Lot 2, a distance of 15.80 feei; thence N 89°
02'44"W. a dist�nce of 303.Q0 feet; thertce N p°20`45"E.
a�distanCe of 15.80 feet; thence S 89°01'.44"� aiong the
westerly extensian �nd the norti� i ine of said l.ots 2 and
29, a distance of 302.98 feet to the point of beginning.
(Easemen� Area � �,787 S�. Ft.}
1971 Senecd Road ,• Sutte E •�' �Mir�n�ota 55122 • (612) 452-3077
�,y ��I _ ,.
Ck�{ 11 �I�g xt.e:-�
M g�si 'F�`-•�
�'F:6 :fiS:TdB �
� �=� 3y$8F�: �q
� 3y .�YR.£3
- � r eg�aE ��°Y$�s
� �� � g�§aE iS��Y�Y t
� '^'•' 8 i�=z�ir.e.tti
� �/III
� � ,
I� .�II �
L.S. �i�93-01 ,
� �
Westminster �rp. ..,.:.._ __ ==
� ,a
� 1;�:._..... � � 2 W •�
: � .� _� Qfl , °
= -� ':' 4=. �; d -�� III'N �� a"a �
;2 =� �i =: _= � �--�a ( .��:_s�,,;: �cn
!s =` :;' := t=� c'� 3d _ _. �"
�t �3 ��j S:} }Yfr�. �'�._-� . .�P p . � '
`3 e3 �. !:" 3r,,' a Z� o ,T-�YN-
'( vll' r
a` 1�� fS; [.: p� � QQ C e
1? ,i3 .r3 �=3 �s3 a y� �
_; � "s i�' �z: is: o .. � _ 8
,: - S:• :�a �f � ,O (1„� .
F_ Fii it 3 a;s °_: � 0 a' °
� .� �L� t1{: ��� tC� C V
�6 ': : � �:i 7�� O = � �
�. L'.. �.R: L. i�t ♦�
�`� �+� S:s 3t3= S[' ��� � V� lL
�.;7 :i: �_.] E_� f=� � �
�� e:: �?3 �' Ys5 ��� c =T� ��q - �'
`.� S_ '2� O i C'7 `y3'
' ��; '�� e�• �S.• �7� m v � [i:5
+=_ � . �:�: :L. R��i � _t �
.1
--`t—........� ;.. ..�..:::�..—�
;`' ..
�� •�� wIl �wIW ���M M
: _ . ........ �
,,►°- ......_ _.....��":�� .....� 1 i
� � `+
�/ ..
- 4 r.
. I�
'�-'•,-"'""_ ' '_....x.� ...w _""�<�'I s
'_ - -- ��,.. ..e.w. .., .. .., �� �
, ly
_� f' �
' _l
'�Y�. 5...'
� . -'i:-�.:.i.
�i'CSw
�af�
'i5iii
b���e�
il.j.. ?
I s
� w
_s�C.. __
: f
'a-x:
' tt: as
�LSF: :a
�
�.. �
�
� �
_
.
Community Development Department
-��_..F.
PI�ANNING DTVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 24, 1993 �`
• �.
TO. William W. Burns, City Managerfi•
FROM: Barbara Dacy, �Cpmmunity Development Director
Lisa Campbel C/Planning Associate .-�
�
SIIBJECT: 1993-95 Curbside and Multi-Unit Recycling
Contract.
As per Council's direction, staff requested and received proposals
for comprehensive recycling services on February 4, 1993. This
memo summarizes key issues and recoaimends a specific contractor.
For a full analysis, see attached February 18, 1993, memo
(Attachment A). Staff has also prepared a brief video for
Council's viewing at the March 1, 1993, Council meeting.
Specifications of the RFP included: a two-year term, twice-a-month
collection (same Friday in Fridle.y collection schedule); acceptable
materials to include cans, glass, newspaper, corrugated cardboard,
:magazines, and catalogs; source separation mandatory for 1-4 unit
buildings; commingled collection optional for 5-12 unit buildings;
90 gallon containers required for 5-12 unit buildings and to be
paid for by contractor; .and one promotional brochure to be paid for
by contractor.
Three proposals were submitted: Super Cycle, Inc.; Gopher Disposal
(TMT Recycling subcontractor); and Waste Management, Inc.
The annual proposal amounts are given below:
Gopher Disposal $141,047.88 (COLA in '94)
Super Cycle, Inc. $152,372.64
Waste Management, Inc. $338,553.24
The total two-year proposal amounts are given below:
Go�her Disposal $286.372.19 (includes'94 COLA)
5uper Cycle, Inc. $304,745.28
Waste Management, Inc. $677,106.48 .
�a.i
1993;y95 Curbside and Multi-Unit Recycling
contract
February 24, 1993
Page 2
Curbside
Estimated annual curbside contract costs are given below:
At�ril '93 -'94 1-4 units Annual Costs
Super Cycle, Inc.
Gopher Disposal
$1.43
$1.42
$131,668.68
$130,747.92
During the first year, Super Cycle is $920.76 more on the curbside
component.
April '94 - '95 '
Gopher Disposal
Super Cycle, Inc.
1-4 unit5
$1.46
$1.43
Annual Cost
$134,670.34 Estimated
$131,668.68
During the second year assuming a 3� COLA, Gopher Dispo�al would
be roughly $3001.66 higher.
Multi-IInits
Included within each proposal was an amount for 1-4 unit buildings
and a separate amount for 5-12 unit buildings. The biggest
difference between the two proposals was within the 5-12 unit
buildings proposal amount. Annual cost estimates are given below:
Multi-IInits
Super Cycle, inc.
Gopher Disposal
1-4
Units
$1.43
$1.42
5-12
Units
$1.99
source
separated
$ .99
commingled
Annual Cost
of 5-12 Units
$20,703.96
$10,299.96
Gopher Disposai
As reported in our memo of February 18, 1993, although Gopher
Disposal had submitted the lowest overall proposal, their request
for a COLA increase would result in a higher contract cost on the
curbside component than 5uper Cycle in the 1994-95 service year.
� �
1993-95 Curbside and Multi-Unit Recycling :`�;°� .�
Contract.
February 24, 1993
Page 3
We also reported that we were concerned that Gopher Disposal had
failed to adequately address the multi-unit costs and may not have
the appropriate equipment to complete the multi-unit component of
the contract.
Gopher Disposal Withdraws Proposal
On Monday, February 22, 1993, Michael Hinz, President of Gopher
Disposal, contacted staff and withdrew Gopher Disposal's proposal
(see Attachment B). Mr. Hinz' reasons for withdrawing were:
1. Gopher Disposal had underestimated the Erost of providing
the 90 gallon containers to multi-units.
2. Gopher Disposal had overextended themselves in making the
commitment to the additional $2,000 a year in promotional
costs.
3. Gopher Disposal was concerned about the unknown
additional cost of the proposed Federai BTU tax.
Prior to Gopher Disposal's withdrawal, staff research had raised
the following issues:
1. In the second service year, Gopher Disposal's contract
price on the curbside component would be roughly $3,000
higher than Super Cycle's.
2. Gopher Disposal has no experience providing multi-unit
services as specified in the proposal.
3. Staff's concern that Gopher Disposal had not adequately
identified the costs associated with servicing multi-
units.
4. Staff's concern that Gopher Disposal may not have the
equipment necessary to service the multi-unit component
of the contract.
Regarding #4, on the day that both proposed contractors were to
bring their multi-unit trucks to the City for the purposes of
filming and evaluation, the diesel fuel in the truck Gopher
Disposal proposed to use for multi-unit collection of cans and
glass had gelled. It was twenty-three degrQes on that day. It is
worth noting that Super Cycfi�e' s tr��ks �-had-����experienced this
difficulty.
i �
1993-95 Curbside and Multi-Unit Recycling
' Contract
February 24, 1993
Page 4
Super Cycle, Inc.
Service Components
Service components under a contract with Super Cycle would include
twice a month collection (same ��Friday in Fridley" collection
schedule); acceptable materials to include cans, glass, newspaper,
corrugated cardboard, magazines, and catalogs, with a two month
window for phone book collection; source separation colleation from
1-4 units; and source separation collection for 5-12 units. Ninety
gallon containers will be provided by the contractor and one
"� promotional brochure will be provided by the contractor.
In addition to the specified services, additional services under
a contract with Super Cyc1e would include collection of recyclables
at the Municipal Center, collection of recyclables at Fridley's six
public schools, and the distribution of 2,000 "Recycling at School"
brochures. Super Cycle is also willing to consider collecting
automobile batteries, magazines, and catalogs at the City's spring
collection. The inclusion of colleCtion of recyclables at the
Municipal Center saves the City $1,320 in payments the City would
otherwise be making to Aagard Environmental.
No Increase in S.W.A.P.` Fee
The total estimated two year contract cost under Super Cycle is
$304,745.28. Assuming S.C.O.R.E. funding levels are not reduced,
no increase in the S. W. A. P. fee" will be necessary to cover this
contract cost. Estimated S.C.O.R.E. and S.W.A.P. fee revenue fo�
the same period is $327,584.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the City Council accept Super Cycle's proposal for
curbside and multi-unit recycling services and direct staff to
complete contract negotiations with Super Cycle and present a
contract for Council approval on March 15, 1993. This
recommendation is based on the following findings:
1. Super Cycle has submitted a competitive proposal.
2. Super Cycle is capable of providing the curbside and
multi-unit service as specified in the City's RFP.
3. Super Cycle is an experienced provider of multi-unit
services. �
4. Super Cycle is willing to comply with a performance
clause.
LC:ls
M-93-82
4C
r �
�
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SQBJECT:
Community,;Development Depa�ment
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
February 18, 1993
William W. Burns, City Manager
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Lisa Campbell, Planning Associate .-
1993-95 Curbside and Mu1ti-Unit Recycling
Contract/Preliminary Findings.
As per Council's direction, staff requested and received proposaZs
for comprehensive recycling services on February 4, 1993. This is
a progress report. A recommendation will be made at the March 1,
1993, Council meeting.
Specifications of the RFP included: a two-year term, twice-a-month
collection (same Friday in Fridley collection scheduZej acceptable
materials to include cans, glass, newspaper, corrugated cardboard,
magazines, and catalogs, source separation mandatory for 1-4 unit
buildings, commingled collection optional for 5-12 unit buildings,
90 gallon containers required for 5-12 unit buildings and to be
paid for by contractor, and one promotional brochure to be paid for
` by contractor.
Three proposals were submitted: Super Cycle, Inc.; Gopher Disposal
(TMT Recycling subcontractor); and Waste Management, Inc. .
The annual proposal amounts are given below:
Gopher Disposal $141,047.88 �(COLA in '94)
Super Cycle, Inc. $152,372.64
Waste Management, Inc. $338,553.24
The total Two-Year Contract Amounts are given below:'
Gopher Disposal
Super Cycle, Inc.
Waste Management, Inc.
.:� - r�',:� s=_�� .�,��:
� �
$286.372.19 (includes'94 COLA)
$304,745.28
$677,106.48
1993-95 Curbside and Multi-Unit Recycling :�� a�
Contract/Preliminary Findings.
February 18, 1993
Page 2.
Curbside
On the Curbside component of the bid, there is a one cent per unit
difference between Super Cycle, Inc., and Gopher Disposal. These
amounts are given below:
April '93 - '94
Super Cycle, Inc.
Gopher Disposal
1-4 units
$1.43
$1.42
Annual Costs
$131,668.68
$13.0, 747 . 92
During the first year, Super Cycle is $920.76 more on the curbside
component.
While Super Cycle's proposal amount on the curbside is higher,
Super Cycle will guarantee its price through the term of the
contract. Gopher Disposal's price is conditioned upon a cost of
living increase in 1994. Gopher Disposal has suggested that this
cost of living be tied to a Consumer Price Index for the Seven
County Metropolitan Area. Assuming a three percentage increase in
1994, the increase in the curbside component of the proposal would
be,roughly $4,000. Subtracting the $920.70 from the $4,000, the
curbside component of Gopher's proposal amount would be roughly
$3,001.66 more t�an Super.Cycle's proposal amount for the 1994-95
service year.
April '94 - '95
Gopher Disposal
Super Cycle, Inc.
1-4 units
$1.46
$1.43
Annual Cost
$134,670.34 Estimated
$131,668.68
During the second year assuming a 3� COLA, Gopher Disposal would
be roughly $3001.66 higher.
Curbside Service Components
Acceptable Materials
Acceptable materials under Super Cycle's proposal include cans,
glass, newspaper, magazines, catalogs, corrugated cardboard.
Gopher Disposal will also .cc��:lect �omob�����°�eries, waste oil,
antifreeze (the last three materials were not required in the RFP)
4E
1993=95 Curbside and
Contract/Preliminary
February 18, 1993
Page 3.
Multi-Unit Recycling
Findings.
as acceptable materials. Gopher Disposal would also pick up
plastics. Due to poor market conditions, staff would continue to
recommend against picking up plastics. Super Cycle has offered to
collect automobile batteries, waste oil, and antifreeze if the City
of Fridley wishes to include this service.
Staff does not recommend including automobile batteries, waste oil,
or antifreeze in the curbside collection program. Staff's
concerns are the City's liability with regard to automobile
batteries and the potential for spills of waste oil and antifreeze.
Should these materials be set out late by a resident or missed by
the contractor, and are left unattended for long periods of time,
they present a greater hazard than cans, glass, newspaper,
magazines, catalogs, and corrugated cardboard.
Fridley residents have other options for proper disposal of these
materials. Antifreeze, if diluted with five parts water to one
part antifreeze, may be drained into the sanitary sewer system.
Automobile batteries may be deposited with any retailer, and waste
oil may be dropped off at four different locations in Fridley.
The City would receive abatement credit for the automobile
batteries and antifreeze. Staff estimates that the additional
abatement would amount to 0.40 tons annually. This is not enough
additional tonnage to justify the associated risks. The City would
not receive abatement credit for the waste oil since its only use
is to be burned as heating oil. Burning is not recycling.
Additional Service Of€ers
Both contractors have made offers of additional services after the
RFPs were submitted. Gopher Disposal has offered to complete one
promotional piece a year for the schools, the cost not to exceed
$2,000 annually. Super Cycle, Inc., has offered to collect at the
Municipal Center, as well as Fridley's six public schools, and to
distribute a school recycling brochure" in schools. The City
currently pays Aagard Environmental $55.00 per month to pick up
office paper only. Over a 24 month period Super Cycle�s offer
would save the City $1,320, in office paper collection costs.
Additional Consideration
Recently a Super Cycle driver missed two entire streets. Super
Cycle has a demerit system for disciplining its employees. The
`�� a°����'received 5 demerits, the highest number imposed for a�ry one -��
offense, and a disciplinary letter was placed in his personnel
file. However, this incident prompts staff to propose that a
performance clause be included in any future contra�t.
�
:� �;�,�'I
,
�.,:;,
1993-95 Curbs•ide and
Contract/Preliminary
February 18, 1993
Page 4.
Multi-IInits
Multi-Unit Recycling
Findings.
Included within each proposal was an amount for 1-4
and a separate amount for 5-12 unit buildings.
difference between the two proposals was within
buildings proposal amount. These figures are given
Multi-IInits
Super Cycle, Inc.
Gopher Disposal
Waste Management, Inc.
Gopher Disposal
1-4
Units
$1.43
$1.42
$3.13
5-12
Units
$1.99
source
separated
$ .99
commingled
$4.84
commingled
unit buildings
The biggest
the 5-12 unit
below:
Annual Cost
of 5-12 Units
$20,703.96
$10,299.96
$5U,355.36
While Gopher Disposal has given us the lowest overall proposal
amount on the multi-units, there is concern that Gopher Disposal
has not adequately addressed the cost of providing service to
multi-units. To service multi-units, special trucks, routing
procedures, and educational materials are needed. Staff estimates
Gopher Disposal's costs at $1.86 per unit and this does �not include
labor, labels, container maintenance and replacement cost. Super
Cycle, Inc., and Waste Management, Inc., identified the purchase
of 90 gallon containers as a significant cost. Waste Management,
Inc., also identified the cost of four new trucks as an additional
cost for their company.
5taff asked Michael Hinz, President of Gopher Disposal, about their
understanding of this unit cost. Mr. Hinz said that the 99 cent
per unit cost was submitted by his proposed subcontractor, Aagard
Environmental, on the multi-units and was based on the assumption
that they would be servicing all o� the five and up multi-unit
buildings, roughly 3,000 units. When Aagard learned that they
would only be servicing 867 units they removed themselves as a
potential subcontractor on the proposal. Mr. Hinz, however, stands
by the 99 cent per unit commingled bid. The RFP clearly stated
that;��the:�p���should be broken down into three different unit
based cost components, as follows: 1-4 unit buildings, 5-12 unit
buildings, and 13 plus unit buildings.
�` '
�
1993-95 Curbside and Multi-Unit Recycling -�°- --
Contract/Preliminary Findings.
February 18, 1993
Page 5.
Gopher Disposal has no experience providing multi-unit service as
specified in the RFP. They currently provide service to 3,000
multi-units in Maplewood. These units are serviced curbside with
curbside recycling containers, rather than with the 90 gallon carts
specified by the City. Curbside containers can be handled manually
by a driver. The 90.gallon containers require equipment that can
lift the cart and dump the materials into an appropriate recycling
truck. Without Aagard Environmenta2's participation, it is not
clear that Gopher Disposal has the equipment necessary to complete
the multi-unit service as specified. Staff is continuing to
investigate this question.
Super Cycle, Inc.
Super Cycle, Inc., has considerable e�tperience servicing multi-
units. They have serviced multi-units for over five years and
currently service 40,000 units with source separated collection
service. The majority of the units are in the City of St. Paul.
In 1991, the City of St.Paul received the National Recyclirig
Coalition's (NRC) "Best Urban Recycling Program" award. In making
the award, the NRC specifically recognized St. Paul's multi-unit
recycling program for its scope and effectiveness. According to
Mary T'Kach, St. Paul's Recycling Program Director, the award would
not have been possible without Super Cycle's flexibility and
commitment to service delivery.
Super Cycle, Inc., has one full-time manager for multi-unit
accounts. This person works closely with multi-unit owners and
management companies to design the best program for the needs of
the specific building. Super Cycle, Inc., has the equipment
necessary to lift the 90 gallon carts required by City and maintain
source separation of the materials.
Super Cycle, Inc., has developed effective labels for the multi-
unit containers that can be understood by persons who do not read
English. Super Cycle learned that such labeling was necessary from
its experience in St.Paul, where large numbers of non-English
speaking persons reside.
Along with all of the required reports Super Cycle, Inc., would
provide an abatement report to building owners or managers that can
be used to motivate residents to continue their recycling efforts.
Regarding the multi-unit component of the proposal, staff along
with the Environmental Quality and Energy Commission, has
determined that Super Cycle, Inc., would provide the City with the
experience needed to make this portion of the City's recycling
program effective and successful.
4H
- 1993-95 Curbside and Multi-Unit Recycling
Contract/Preliminary Findings.
February 18, 1993
Page 6. �
Summarv
A recommendation will be developed for Council consideration at the
March l, 1993 Council meeting.
LC:lc
M-93-56
4t
Attachment B
Ie17: �=::!-j;`a t:: L. C: � 1-1 i P�I i.
i;i i�.,�...!!:={�;: :��;[ ��,r-�i�i:���ai... i Gd+:;
F'i:? T>>��+; �:
s'tiIC:=L�! �' ��? F�: i I"� f•,I '��':�� r_t �;'� �
h�� EE�f��:�_1f�(='t`,' �_.�_ . i' �"-':=.
�_ � •::.'�f� �_ �'�1�'1i��'�..-{�:���._
I�C���:rG1_.TI�{�; i:�i=�>;iF���.i.I\IATI_II-i
�_ :r. �r�� ,_,�-- F:-��:� z r_���_���•,,
�,.,�:f:_ ,. ,_�;�.� r �,�L:�=��_: a:..�..,:f F,t�c ��e�
r� �: z ��_}� ��� ,��r�a �����:_:�i
;:-, , .y. ; .
1 !�._f•i� •. L._ !. •_:�f�i ?
. .... _.... , . _ ,... .... . .. ..._ ... . . _. _ . _
. .� �.. .. . .
� „ � � : � � ° ..{ I ; - i� �i �"' ' I �I ! i i_i l ! t
_ r- �_+ t d . , � 1-i i !-1 _ ��• 1 � E_ �1 L. �:. �_,; _ !—'. L-_ `a'_ � t � : � '_'� J � :_: _ z. I t I L_ _ i _ Y _ _ ..i
.._ ._.. ._:. . ... - - -
.
�. � ... � ,:. , t :: ': t '- y
� �
.
; � i , . `�' ;...� i... '. e ��i �_� ;:� s.,_ �',.�i = �_: ,... �-� _ P�.i i._: 1 i: - ... _. ._ ._ :.l - _ _. i _ . ... ... —i: _
:..... ._ ;...... + i �' C::. { 'Y _ . �... ��_,� . ; ; : ... �.: . t: ' z._ ._ ... �` � ''•i �
,;_. ._ ...,.. . ,. .. _ . . . ._ .... . ' '
_. ... .
�.: ... �... � � r : - .. . ., �. . , . .. . . r" ; ._ L t , — � �_ � •
!.! .... �._ _. ! `. . :::. Y"t 1._..;; , � t_ I i'- ,—f � �_• .!. i 'i' �y t\� I : i,_!':_i �-i .� :'- i-- `'; �'�-. � _� f-i � =; 1 ,'f C:: L�: .i. i F-i l..f ,-�`f-�ti .i 1 { �_ 1" ;
,... _.. ._ .... _ .._ .. .... ..,.., � _` ., ;
,. .., .
. � �.,� � ; �_� ; �..: �. . . . � •._ `.. ' " � ) '- t'' i .. r. i C:. • , ;. ,-, L. � i } -
�' : :._�: �_l•_,¢_`! t_1 ! j"t I •._� � t :_. � � i7_ 't i'. ".'�+ �:=��. i^;��� S.� �..: �_ii' `d t.._ ..i:_� �. i_�y�•;•...� �� 4�..� _ �t�' �7 _ '. V•�
.I. � !.w �`'�1 •`�: j i i ;_, ]. i ; �—� �) �
�.!� I;i'�;.__�Li=:E�:'_� i� t•1F-�1���.i�� �i I-!L i_ i;�:��'�.. � f�_ i� �Fz;_�':; 7: i i:� ����:� �_ r�i; �'=� i'a�� "I-i-�E: i°1t_IL."i'� I_.
i::'t;�.:i7 f ' . . .
. i��t� �.L L.. �"i� �..: :_�1'��"��.>> :,x: ���? R
, �. :., .... .__ _ _ .. - — � .. �
:, _.. ... . .
�.....j�;:_ ,:.�.;{.. ��� f }.i4''''.:; { (v:,, . . ;_t i•�.i •1 �"�t.i _ f —:r-� o-,:� .
.*. . �• :
. , i ( i s-; __� _... r-. ..: ... t i i ! �. .' i :. '•? � �_� � E•i )_� �..� . I !. �_� i •�i hi _.. I"j ,_� � �.� i. ._ _. _ �. ; i..;. ,-� !' �. �_� ! I �.) � .i. }_� ;� �..q �_.
ii-� ;�C'-:
,...�� #��.�,.. ,;. .... .
,...: .,._ .�... ._ . ' .
� _ f' .. ... ..._ _. o
._..-i�l-�i�:. i_ft:,�:::i�•�;_;�,;���,; r-�r'�:, �, -I' T i,it,�N?L_ �_ 1�,,�:;_i. -� �_; I��E: �?l.:� _� _�f �:L}�:�' : 1=i1 i� 7��_i -j ;...tr.
_ __ ._ .... ... ... . _ '
�-��-�:t._tr-�.,����;:_;_+ ,r=�!=�i::a; =i�.f�il._ �.;-j-i_{ , v - ,_, ;.:;;�- .
! f , r, � _. .� ._ :-i E'` �'' 1._ .'t i:: (_i 1 .f _; !— �_� W. _ ��
i:��_�_:�i_l��;�: t�E 'TFtTF.E:i 1..�=� i�E r=1'�: L�Tt_I��;Lf'•,Ii` �5'=� f='�:�'_��_;Ii`LE 7�i-a f�"R�=i�'TiiL TI�-IL:
_ .. . .. ,:� :-_ ... � �-...:_ _ , ..--
�_ts-:.'_: r.. !:� ���; T+_�l�� i`i_� .:_,c._�.:! �r,.t �'1.,E:: �':i,it:I..���,���,..i tt�;._ 't �_;_..�. �...i�:�i �=:i_s°�:i-i t��1!`��' y G;I�..;t�i`d I"'i
Ir���=�'�� s� 1:'�:�C: ����v'I:=F�.E:::C�j -i-I-It�=;l� i�l-�E +_: F{I��:�?" �_ �������� �::!f��':; i�i i::=::�; T►ii"; 1:�iC :��:� 7: i�� ,_1!. ii=; ���_'=�,.f l. �;�
��`�__�{%�::. f��)i'�i{-:;-�i�_� ..i �"':�'i�.i.i',�i�� '�"F..! 1,1':!..:':"�'".I_� � � - r: I._� �:: ��' +..: `.i . _.,. .
_ _.. _.. _... _ _
_ f_.i�; _ t�i��= � �-i i�_. �._.:. t- a: - i�_���-��, �.. k��.�. �1.. t. �;_ t_i h!}:!-{
,:_� _ ,, „ ..,.. __, . , .... .
Y'�'_. ' 1. �_ t �.... . i j 1: 1 -— ..-• F' "_ +'�
,a_t••ii,'� � 1=s +. ;�i �.•_ -� 7.?"f�_ 1�r�. 1—�t��;.�� %i�_��,� _ i_;..i.. ����_ .!. �:+E::.i�t:�� tHS.,i i p; , �-•�i_i ���.i;
� _ . � . ... � . � �.... � �_' �. � �_.� ._ _..i �._ ,. `, .. . .� ._. �Y� _ ;.� ., . . _ ._ ._. _. ... _ (_fi,.::� .._ � .' . j ..�_ , 1 •'� ` � � ��
i�:::� �-�� i i..., �. L:-II�::�,-_t•. -.. 1:.��= i::-i�.�. �::�; .r=�1._. �::: � i";�x . i-:_,;-�..� L��: _�� _ t:.: t, I..: _ t� �a�
1=`L..[:��'=,L� i�E_ f:i:[��.' I'��E_L�� -i"H�-��1" �`�hl�t�` CaF� TF-�� F:�i:;;�;iC�;i_�'.!.':�:1'��.i�i� .�: i Et'C�� �k. 'i���L_F�::i..t:+
. .... . ., . ... ._ ,�. ,.. �
��;i_�i i i .�. 1.� .[ L_i._ i_�I.._raL�L`s' .�.•i-dy���;E' �,�; �..f�.i 'Y_i_�i_: y �;;s��= i �+�+ �= �=E� i._ �=;�i'F;��is`:I. ��_'r Fi :�;��;. i..�.
i��i_t;�` ;`r=r%i(=; i: i._i�i`iF::f`d�( �� ,_� f�:�:=�� 1`t=:t...1. i`•:��:� f�i3`:ILi -1..�...�j�.':.�E_: f'Fi��s °1�:��-;�?: ���i�If�iL_ I i_tj:Ft_ `�; ^;ri�=rf_(?...L�
_:._ -.,,,, -, :...... _
�..;,... . : : : r_ � � . :
f—i •,• �-1 �. 1. ;.._!:� I a._� i—ii_�-- :, '_:t._� _�:.hi���i':. �.�H1._ _ i. i" i. `�1:.:1'i' i: i'�' 1, E{— .__�.._�"'
,,._, c: "': �4-,
.... .. .
�... 4., .... . ::
�._� .. 1'`� ..: �...: . _ �._. Y :�
��' �' L��Je"`' � l �"�!^�
��
;=+:. r ; _ i..i ;=�� E _ i.._ +:::: :: '.- i �: � . ....
4J
i
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: �Iliam W. Burns, City Manager ,�� PW93-068
� � `
FROM: John G. Flora, Pubiic Works Director �
DATE: February 25, 1993
SUBJECT: Storm and Sanitary Sewer Repair Project No. 242 ��-
On Wednesday, February 24, 1993, at 9:00 am, bids were opened for the Storm and Sanitary
Sewer Repair Project No. 242. Of the eight ptans distributed, only one bid was received from
Insituform Cent�al, inc. The bid received was for $161,020.
The engineer's estimate on this project was $164,000 to $168,000. Funding for this project is
budgeted in the 5-year Capital Improvement Sanitary Sewer Fund and the Storm Sewer Capitat
Improvement Fund.
Recommend City Council receive the bids and award the Storm and Sanitary Sewer Repair
Project No. 242 to Insituform Central, Inc. for $161,020.
JT/JG F: cz
C
Attachment
/
�
��
5 �
BID FOR PROPOSALS :�»=��6� -.W
STORM & SANITARY SEWER REPAIR, PROJECT NO. 242
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1993, 9:00 A.M.
PLANHOLDER BID BOND TOTAL BID COMMENTS
Insituform Central, lnc. 5% $161,020
6167 N Kent Ave Continentai
Miiwaukee, WI 53217
Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. NO BID
P. O. Box 367
Osseo, MN 55369
Eagle Construction Company, Inc NO BID '�
2400 N County Road 76
Little Falts, MN 56345
Midwest Underground Inspection NO 81D
383 Woodland Dr
Isanti, MN 55040
Municipal Pipe Tool Co., Ina NO BID
515 5th Street, Box 398
Hudson, IA 50643
Northdale Construction NO BID
14450 Northdate Blvd
Rogers, MN 55374
Visu-Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. NO BID
2849 Hedberg Dr .
Minneapolis, MN 55343
5A
BUQCET SUMMARY
RELWII�C�-STO�RM/SANITARY SEWER LlNES
Sanitarv Sewer
1992 Georgetown Apt Lift Station
Cancelled
Reroute Onan Sanitary line -
Cancelled
Net Savings
$21,000
10,500
1 500
1993 Apex Lift Station
Canceiled 50 000
' Net Savings 1 500
1993* Reline 15-tn. Sanitary
61 st from 4th to
5th St (Expense) 1993 Bid 34 736
TOTAL SAVINCS 46 764
Storm Sewer
1992 Stonybrook Creek
Savings
Community Park -
Cancelled
McGlynn F�cpense
Reline 75th and
Overton Pipe
Net Expense
1993 * Relfne 75th Storm
(Budget)
Net Savtngs
7993* Reltne 7.5th and
Overton 1993 bld
TOTAL SAVINGS
TOTAL STORM AND SANITARY SEWER RELINING PROJECT
PROJECT NO. 242
.
$ 15�522
10,500
( 1,580j
27 236
2 794
180 000
177 206
126 284
50 922
161 020
� .,-_.;.; . c -. .. : .. . . �. . . .,.•r _ ' t . ..•, :
� UM�?Y wCSo 1 ', `. � ��s—ai
/ � ��
,,,. � L�
.,.� .... ,
. .,.. . �.
.... /�
...r •� /�/ �,.Y /
� ' t 'C� s
, J�Q� C t �
���NtUCK i
4 YAOSIM M([�+Nd >
,�ARK ti
v w
w�M1! �' �i
� ��I
� M��.L !�1 ����� � ��� � ` �� ���
'�<e //
I.�`"��
Ctw��w
'NL�\
tw( ' ��f�
. �� il
��:::,• ___-_
�� �� - .
. •n•� ew�.:.
n - -
1� ��ie��I tr � �;
Ir .1 1 .�� �
�� JI � � ��
.11 � ��1 y/ il
:..� ,. .. ,.
., ., . . w.���._
;; ";t_;; - . :
:;'�.�._ trvuuw.•
�1 1� ,)
M Tt M�tC � �
�� 11 11 �1
1' :_Gl 1� .11 J
MI �1 �'
:11 :1/ ' f
�/ �11 ��
�/ =qR��lGi��.
. 1 Wna �a�4{:
�� � _
l '� •- � �' • ,�r /�� � LOCKE t+ PARK u n � ?
t'S ��� � � �� S
..... � � <�., ,� C: 3
': v .....� ^ � � � . Ci ;, �.w:::..
1_ c5 u ■ �, � ,� � n
" b n b � ✓ =� � :� 6• ^ � � � �' � �,, � .
,'7 G`� •�` _� n G �' J�G � �` � c Q c� G C n•`'�"""°"
, L,,� b �� � :•� C y � n.ka w« b '� � p c; �� n
�� i] �.�u. ..c , "�� J �^ J � F C� �C� �i T C J �' ` - - �n � c'�
J n L
,� " t. :� � cj �_ " _ .' � O
<.�t. - -� . ( � .. 4 aJ
_,,,— =—.-f—. . . — ----�-�4 \ .�
,��... �. �•�:
=�.�.�.�` tNCH '
....... T — -
� �� �
5 L � � . STORM
� M
/ �
� i •
i� '
%`�r�.�iP� , �
'�,� '''• ~l`%� � � / 1 , ai � _—
' s�—�
� � ' �4�
� , �� c
' .... � _" �-r---
�
�
� e-.y 1 + f.V
�f\ � _ — � F i' � � t .
���� + f "t
� : 1•�•�.. •.1
�r.d.:.o.«r �1 .. �,tr� . !': ��
�-=- J1— �-i r
taw.a+ -- t'T� T"'—�
0
��.i. f`� � I ,-`
�: "� l:J;�
�� � „ •, e• rn � .
. ���
� �
• Y ��
� U� �
' ..�
�O Y �O°
--1 :
} �wu ��.1 i! M� ` � . 1 �"� i 1 � r.�
v .�a. ..1. T
1 �.'• e.. Cf rla�flt �`(`�i
i }�{: <} <.. � Ly ' �.
C' �7�C� � +'" I.jF F�..I.•.l.F
: I. . �'. �.
1 �� =
.� c...... i��tj�._�� }
1 ��:.�. °., �` i.1. � r � r ��: � i T r
�� c: � i, : • j„�
-t : �.�
SANITARY c� = --..C��,; . r 1-� :.l j� �
� J J^ �..1� � ��} {�f_F. E.1 ' r: f
-1 �_ -��-- _ . _ . . . _ -�r
l f —1 r+ ' '_.' � I�' i
�
/ J
n�
cJ
0
f" '
,'
� r��iJl�n `'
4il1:;` L�,CtiMN3_ _ _ _
�
�
. �
c
1
7 �
I' _"-
. ;�.
� . ....'.:. , , � :
.ee+c
���� ::�.:�.... �� _.., .�,� ..o..
1 �.
� 5�'
�n
�� �{
�
U . :�..� .
•�l�Ml N •��/
V
�
we.M�. a..t � �
�
tMnt� •
�� � ` `\
��\
, _�.
C`�, ' ,� �,�
,f, y`��-� .__
.��� ` .
E. .--•
r
Kl (��� ���•
» ��
.... : ..<.. �� fI
(, �
� ---
b_ _ _
/
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:�
Englneering
Sewer
water
Pa�ks
Sl�eets
Mainfen�nte
� MEMORANDUM �
William W. Burns, City Manager
John G. Flora, Public Works Director
January 19, 1993
Storm and Sanitary Sewer Repair Project No. 242
PW93-001
In the 1993 Storm Sewer Capital Outlay budget approved by the City Council, $180,000 was
identified to repair the storm sewer lines on 75th Ave NE and Overton. We propose ta
repair the lines through the insertion of an inverted epoxy liner to the existing storm sewer
pipe, .similar to the repair work on the Onondaga Street and Bennett Drive storm sewer
projects. Based upon the video data of the corrugated metal sanitary sewer line on 61st ihat
failed last year, we propose to reline the 15-inch CMP between 4th and Sth Streets within
the original project budget parameters. Funding for this work will come from the sanitary
sewer fund.
Estimated costs:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Last year's projeci No.' 232 was increased
with the transfer of funds from this pro}ect:
36-in. P.CP storm sewer liner on 75th frc�:n
Bacon Drive to Arthur Street
18-in. RCP storm sewer lizier on Overton between
Able and Monroe
15-in. CMP sanitaiy sewer on 61st from 4th to Sth
TOTAL
$z�,000
65,000
32,200
60,000
184 400
Plans and specifications have beea� pi-epared and we are now ready to advertise for bids.
Recommend the City Council approve the resolution to advertise for bids for the Storm and
Sanitary Sewer Repair Project No. 2�2.
JT/JGF:cz
Attachments
5D
��J�y�
iPoDL°Y
c�nco, 2fl. �vcz
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
COMBINED LIST BY YEAR �.,,�:�. __.. .�.
1993 '
F1RE DEPT BASEMENT STORAGE RM
COURT RESURFACING
PICNIC SHELTERS
MOORE LAKE PARKING ADDITION
RIVERVIEW HEIGHTS BIT. PATHWAY
79TH AV LIFT STA-LINE (DIVERSION)
REBU�LD APEX �N. LIFi' STATION
HIGHLAND IAKE/52ND AVE SWALE
DRAINAGE PROJECT
STONEYBROOK CREEK EROSION
RELINE 75TH AVE. STORM SEWER
LOCKE LAKE DAM REPIACEMENT
1993 STREET REGONSTRUCT PROG
1993 OVERLAY PROJECT
1993 SEALCOAT PROGRAM
UNIVERSITY AVE. BIKEWAY
OPTICOM (EMERG VEIi RESEMP) 81S7/83AD
WELL REPAIR-2, 3 & 7
CHLORINE ROOM MODIFICA710N
LOCKE PARK �ILTER PLANT REPAIR
WATER UTILITY COMPUTER SYSTEM
* TOTAL AMOUNT $57,500
GENERAL
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
PARKS
SEWER
SEWER
STORM WATER
STORM WATER
STORM WATER
STORM WATER
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
STREETS
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
5E.
�
GENERALFUND
PARKS
PARKS .
PARKS
PARKS
SEWER FUND
SEWER fUND
STORM WATER UTIL.
STORM WATER UTIL.
STORM WATER UTIL.
STORM WATER UTIL:
STREET FUND
STREET FUND
STREET FUND
STREET FUND
STREET FUND
WATER UTILITY
WATER UTILtTY
WATER UTILITY:, -
WATER UTILITY
GRAND TOTAL FOR
5,000.00
12,OOO.QO
� � ��� ��
�� ��� ��
�. �1 ��
60,040.00
50,000.00
200,040.00
75,000.00
180,000.00
30,218.00*
209,000.00
263,000.00
124,000.00
� 25,000.00
30,000.00
60,000.00
70,000.00
500,000.00
.� ��� ��
2,239.718.00
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Sireets
Mainter,ance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �I � PW93-067
�
FROM: John G. Flora, �ublic Works Director
DATE: February 24, 1993
SUBJECT: Receive Bids and Award of Contract: Corridor Ma'�atenance Project No. 243
On Wednesday, February 24, 1993, at 10:30 am, bids were opened for the Corridor Maintenance
Project No. 243. This project covers the mowing, spring cleanup, weed controi and trash pickup
of approximately 60 acres of right-of-way along University Avenue and East River Road from April
15, 1993 to August 1, 1993.
Eight (8) potential bidders reviewed the plans and specifications and four (4) bids were received.
The low bidder was lnnovative Irrigation, with a total bid of $14,947. They were the 1992 Lake
Pointe Maintenance contracto� and did a satisfactory job last year.
Mn>DOT personnel will take over maintenance 'of the corridor after August 1 and will continue
until the end of the growing season. See the attached map for the areas in question.
Recommend City Council receive the bids and award the contract for the Corridor Maintenance
Project No. 243 to Innovative Irrigation for $14,947.
.!T/JG F: cz
Attachments
u
/
�
CfiYOF
FRIDLk.Y
BID FOR PROPOSALS
CORRIDOR MAINTENANCE, PROJECT NO, 243
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1993, 10:30 A.M.
PLANHOLDER BID BOND TOTAL BID COMMENTS
Innovative Irrigation 5% United $14,947
10006 U�iversity Ave NW
Coon Rapids, MN 55448
Jon Isaccson Lawn Care $850 Cashiers $16,990
105515 County Rd 1 i6 Check
Rogers, MN 55374
Weber Construction $855 Cashiers $17,100
11900 Fletcher Ln Check
Rogers, MNs 55374
Arteka-Natura! Green 5% Wausau $19,000
15195 Martin D�
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
B&D Underground, Inc. NO BID
1351 County Rd 83
Maple Plain, MN 55359
ChemLawn Commercial Services NO B1D
1167 E Highway 36
P O Box 9280
Mapiewood, MN 55109-9921
Peterson Construction NO BID
Routs 1, Box 27
Erhard, MN 56534
Z's Lawn Maintenance NO BID
Box 339
Circle Pines, MN 55014
• �
Submitted by _
Department
PUBLIC WORKS
Acxount
No.
John G. Flora
4340 IServices contracted
Justification:
FRiDLEY
nent B
etail FoRn
Doliar
Amount
Requested
inc./Dec.
Over Last Year
Total Budget
Requested
�165,000.00
Vehicle and equi�nent subtet repair
Rubbish hauling/City dumpsters/land-
fill hauling
Contract snow removal �
Contract street sweeping �
Contract diseased treeJstump �emovsi
Building 8� HVAC repairs
Buifding cfeanirig service
Lock and security repai�s (alarms)
Electrical repairs
Storm warning services
Fire ext. �echa�ge service
Corrido� maintenance
Concrete curb 8 gutter repair
Radio repair, page� air time
Weed a�d lawn aquatic applications
Roof maintenance & repair ` °
Miscellaneous services - used tires;
scoreboard, etc.
TOTAL
�
Budget Year 1993
Division
STREET� PARKS, MECHANICS
City Manager's
Recommendation
Councii's
Deasion
15,000.00
15,000.00
16,500.00
18,000.00
25,000.00
3,000.00
6,000.00
3,000.00
2,5U0.00
2,500.00
1,000.00
17,000.00 ��
15.000.00
2,000.00
15,000.00
2,000.00
6,500.00
$165,000.00
, , . __ _
-�.� .1: �`�.:�: ��: _' _. _. �. __. ; .'o,�..� � so�oo�
: •:-.. •' — ocs,nw,s o�n� s
::. _.`�: 'ti-'' — — �. � ��
r -%' � ''.•"=" -- — __ --- _ .
. —'.� �" Z ;'• ��':� _ - '._'� � _ "
,\ _r :�-... .. . . „ `� ---_ _- _ _ ��.._-•--
--�_ '
. _ NORTN OF OSBORNE� , „�,�„�, T ..i, -- � - _
y MEDtAN b WEST SlDE ONLY =`�` � � � �-.
: ... `� 1 ; � ,
- � : ..-:�: � -• • � _ : _ = � - , � � r..=.,....
' - � ��::� . � �' �° ;� �� . - � --__ _ _ F� � _• -
\ T ��w�l.�� �_.� r 'l _ _ • �• �� _ ..._ �_ ^ "-r' •
� ` � , t"•-:r=;,� .�'�-, �:�j,.';: �:.., ^,� , -- �" � ,. /
� ,.� :,>� t:? - -';�. •� � ... . � �-�r
, ,: ,
- �.._`� ` �. .�1.• = ,' _
�. '� � � ,�=; -•� ! UNIVERSITY AVE. MEDIAN INCLUDED .M�,.��.
\ . ,. ,, � — :�.,� . T�.. ' -�- `5,,,�_ ��►:•��....�•; � �T_-�;,�==.-...r.:.— ..:..�.—•-. -;i
\! + Lr� s��,�� � T �% � - • ' -
- �6 ; wI ; • .:: = _ :1 � ' __' '� ._:; � : _r�"
� • g✓.r _ j� ' � � n __ � _ i.
` CENTER MEDIAN^ • . -- ''• •� .--. _'_� �`' ... . ' - -, l�,' ' il
' -�_.. t /'; ---,_ _,' - � �, _- _.. . ��^ '�
. � � •� � ' �.- �' �
� INCLUDED =�j,:.� - -.__ -=. �'�• � � :.- • -� � ►:� 1_ _ - v_-� �� =_ i-
` _i,- :.:•�- � '- '� ��. }_ �;� r
� � � ' •`,\ i —' i � • i,( r----_— _- :._ • �
N '; '�`i � ; . �._• � �� � , i �� — � :�-� ., �� . _�_ _ `_��
� - —i � 1 1 � :� __ -- !•r--- --�L.__... _�'
� l— -• � — --- ��._------=. \
�. � 1.�� �� �:, t, ; --; - - : ,:.� ,_ _, - -�-i
w,�� .__ �-E : : �.; -� Ic .. : _ �� -- .x -i= � _
i �,=��, ! r ''�-"`�.`•. �-�.� ;-.'s �� �; i � �� `i .+ �,�--_ 1 .. _ _ (
� 1 ' I �- ::i �. ��- _ _ �_ --_ . r
, . =- • - i . --;�- _ • �
D . . . • � ' : �' _'T ;.: . � '. '. . . . ..— .-1 �"t •'=:\
'� � . S . ,�- _ ..e.=.,:, ,
' �`. '='-�' V� NOTE: HIGHWAY FENCE ENDS AT 69TH AVE.
—, .-:�i�;,:..,,--.-
�, � =_ ,L�,.-i,� :% - � "- - _ . -- . -- -�. �
' /� �J ,�,�. ,. :�_. .�- .�;�-.' _� �n •' '�
, =�Li'-'��;� �='i�..-�- r--' { :� � ��.._'�:-
� c�-Y�! .��r--'�'����j• ,r ```-::�'f`' J
a �' 1: �.� 1 :,. C /� � ' � � �� : ::-� •T-: : _::._..
: y -�-: �� _ �Y � ' �: � CUTTING REQUIRED ON - '�-�;�•` . -.
� "� - �
i • � '-'�� '~''� 'c r�'��i •BOTH S1DES OF FENCE ._;:;�-:� JC; �
, . � T �::�.r-.. : �.�-�` : �:�� i. ,• , : � •: '• -_ .1� �.Lt�
' . \,�` �. ___,.___ _ - �!:.=_-; ' _ ;F ��_i^I: . _ _-_...
� i ;� ! / r=� t.-•.: —• ._- _---;- .l -�i: • : .t �
� —.� .=- — — � '_ �;�' ��.I •F`-� .�.1 �'•� � _Ji iI` "' �t I._ '►: •F ��
. = :i _�! _ " ' '�-�.��� � `�^ ''��'
i�� . � �^ � � � � . j��
. - i � � h � 3 , �� � ) :�, `- � )� tI� ; � 1 i . �'7��
� -- . �= � �:`f� I
� ► CEN7ER MEDtAN • ;, ••:.:.: : :�..� � • .' '
:.^ • � �. \ • --
� � !� 11,1�'• •�.< < �.;°:�r � a _ G%� i
• INCLUDED ' � $LIP OFF, _ .._: ., ;,•', ;i'4 = - - ��''' �� �
� � v � lNCLUDED ` ' : "�`:�����_�- �'
'�'•''� I ' =- � � � : i� I( =::f:--_'=�' `' . �r . : � �l`-
. '`f'� 1 O, - ' _:i� =:-=_i t� G;i �] • ..
� j� .�._.;: T- T rt N� �I
. . . � � ��� /// = � ' ' +,"__:T�= ��' w�� •� r%` -:+-.::.:-n
Y� / - � � ` ' = t �: •^ .' � -�i
�
, :, `� U :,� +.
�.�
L _ _�: �.
� . -
. � � _ • � .`�1 �� :; � _ = i. : ,
� ,�= _ � � o � I _ - �:� �;:
.-. �, .
� CENTER MEDIAN ONLY 1 '+� ��� ___ i '� - _ _
;•:
� _ CUTTING REQUIRED ON � � :
j� ENCE:��U ' _' r
' � ; / i '� '� )_ � BOTH SIDES OF F -- -�
. '� _� y/� � — — . r.
{ . . � .I �� � 1 t�..�.�J
- ��i t I 11 1�" � �
1 � � � .•, I -- - �;YL �.:.�-.
� � � : _ �;� �.�µ2 s, � -
. ,
�" PROJEC i a4k ' ' 243
; ' - : ; ,� �...
, � � . ------ --. .__ ..__. .---- �- -�---_ . _. . _. .. -
�� _ �
l _
' � � CUT TO EAST CURB LINE
. . I �4 � ����� f � -__'_�_.`__.-.�_��___... . ��_... .
� � ' �:� � D EAST SERVICE ROAD
�� �� •
� =�:��� — �
� :�a . _ �, �
—,— � � . � ,�
� A , --
. , , :.�. .� , . . _ . .
7
� � �
�' FOR CONCURRENCE BX THE CITY COUNCIL
FTZlD�.�' March 1, 1993 �
Type of License: By: Approved By:
LIVESTnCK ��
Kenneth Jereczek � Same Steven Barg
101 Charles St. N.E.#4 Comm. DeveTopment
Fridley, MN 55432
MOTOR•VEHICLE BODY REPAIR_ '
Fridley Auto Body, Inc. Paul Johnson � Barbara Dacy
960 Osborne Rd.�N.E. Comm. Development
Fridley, MN 55432
�.
�
9
LiCEN8E8
`Fees :
' $10.00
$75.00