Loading...
09/13/1993 - 4942'� - _ FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL F�� SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION: Citizenship Day: September 17, 1993 Constitution Week: September 17 - 23, 1993 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of August 16, 1993 �� �� ADOPTION OF AGENDA: �� �� OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: (Consideration of ltems Not on Agenda - 15 Minutes) Presentation by Barbara Sykora from Congressman Rod Grams' Office FRIDLEY CIIY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING: Amend Redevelopment Project Area and Create Tax Increment District No 13 �� � .� . ............... � = ,�wG� 64th Avenue Storm Water Projec No.260 ..............�................... 2-2A � �� �1 OLD BUSINESS- Second Reading of an Ordinance Under Section 12.06 of the City ��'O"'''� Charter Declaring Certain Real "� H Estate to be Surplus and Authorizing the Sale Thereof . . . . . . . . . �. . 3 - 3C � �� Second Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code, Chapter 205, Entitled "Zoning," by Amending Sections 205.07.06, 205.08.06, 205.09.07, and 205.10.06, and Renumbering the Remaining Sections Consecutively . . . . . . . . . . . . �� 'L. ,(% l v? � . . ,- FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 3 NEW BUSINESS: Appointment: City Employee . . . �'�: First Reading of an Ordinance Recodifying the Fridley City Code, Chapter 102, Entitled uPolice," by Amending �cJ Section 102.03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / Resolution in Support of an Application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise � Permit to Fridley Jaycees (Sandee's Restaurant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution in Support of an Application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit to Fridley Jaycees (Joe DiMaggio's Restaurant) � , � f � � � 5 �......... �� ��� � �� /" 6-6A 7-7A ,,/ - / � .. �.. 8-8A v�' Approve Junk Yard License Renewal �r,v,(j for Sam's Auto Body Parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �,�- . .. � � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER i 3, 1993 Page 4 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�: Receive the Minutes of the CAN Advisory Commission Meeting of July 28, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �� . ��....... �,. U � Receive the Minutes of the Pianning Commission Meeting of August 11, 1993 : . . . . . . . . . . . . A. Establish a Public Hearing for September 27, 1993, for a Preliminary Plat Request, P.S. #93-03, by Oliver Tam, Tam Addition, to Replat Property Generally Located at 1160 F�reside Drive N.E. B. Establish a Public Hearing for September 27, 1993, for a Rezoning Request, ZOA #93-01, by Oliver Tam, to Rezone Property from C-3, General Shopping Center, to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, on Property Generally Located at i 160 Fireside Drive N.E. . . . . . . � ... .Uy 11 ..... . 11K /�,e�-� S � � � � ............... 10 - 10V 11 - 11SS � �J�� G - 1�G - 11 BB �� �% 11G - 11 11CC - 11L FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 5 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUE �: Receive the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of August 11, 1993 (Continued): C. Establish a Public Hearing for September 27, 1993, for a Vacation Request, SAV #93-03, by the City of Fridley to Vacate all Easements as Donated and Dedicated to the Public for Drainage and Utility Purposes and as Shown on the Recorded Plat of Shorewood Plaza, as Corrected by Surveyor's Certificate Files as Document No. 176792, Generally Located at the Intersection of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive Between Highway 65 and Central Avenue. The Subject Parcels Include the East and West Moore Lake Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet Swim and Health Club, and Sears Outlet . . . . . . . . . . � 1���'�' -5� � ................. Establish a Public Hearing for September 27, 1993, for a Preliminary Plat Request, P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley, to Replat Property Generally Located at the Intersection of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive, Between Highway 65 and Central Avenue ................. .�S , ��� t� 111 - 11J 11MM - 11SS �'J � � �� G� .................... 12-12Q FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 6 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): Receive an Item from the Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of July 27, 1993: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13N A. Variance Request, VAR #93-18, by Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen, to Reduce the Front Yard Setback from 35 Feet to 31.3 Feet; to Reduce the Side Yard Setback from 5 Feet to 2.3 Feet; all to Allow the Construction of a Double Car Garage at 5831 West Moore Lake Drive N.E. i � s� S `" � , / (� � Receive an Item from the Minutes of the Appeals Commission Meeting of August 31, 1993: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . . 14 - 140 A. Variance Request, VAR #93-22, by Mark Btegen, to Reduce the Front Yard Setback from 35 Feet to 8.2 Feet; to Reduce the Side Yard Setback from 10 Feet to 9.8 Feet; to Allow the Reconstruction of a Nonconforming Siructure that was Damaged More Than Fifty Percent of its Value Due to Fire Damage, Generally Located at 275 Ironton Street N.E. Resolution Extending Approval of a Subdivision, Lot Split, L.S. #93-01, to Create Two Separate Parcels Generally Located North of 61 st Avenue and West of Fifth Street (By Westminster Corporation) � / � DS �. i ..................... 15 - 15E FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 7 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED� Approve Rebcation Consultant �� ��' Contract with Professional /0� c Redevelopment Resources . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16H Approve Rental License Application S�/�S for Resrdential Rental Property Located at 541 - 53 1/2 Avenue �r � N.E. ....................................... 17-17B Approve Rental License Application �3/� for Residential Rental Property Located at 4042 Main Street N.E. . . . . . . . . . .�. . . . . . . 18 - 18A Establish a Public Hearing S for September 27, 1993, for �� N� Consolidation of the Fridley ;��%c,�j Police Relief Association's � Police Pension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Establish a Public Hearing for December i, i 993; a Reconvening Date of December 13, 1993, if Necessary; and a Subsequent Hearing Date of December 20, 1993, on the 1994 Budget fior the City of Fridley �/�� 19 � �� v�� y�`�`,� � � ..................................... 20 - 20C FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 8 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�: Resolution Adopting a °Proposed" Budget for the Fiscal Year 1994 y�� �s/'",_! ............ .. � . 21 -21B Resolution Certifying "Proposed" dK� Tax Levy Requirements for 1994 to ��� s���S the County of Anoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . 22 - 22A �i Resolution Authorizing Changes in Appropriations for the General Fund, Cable TV Fund, Grant Management Fund, HRA Reimbursement Fund, Drug and Gambling Forfeiture Fund, and the Capital Improvement Fund for the Year ��a� �l�.�- DSI �� . ...................................... Resolution Designating 1992 Fund r� Balances .......................... 23 - 23C Approve Amendment of Joint Powers Agreement for Construction and � ry,.l,� Operation of Fire Training Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �� / �V�' 24C 25 - 25B FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 9 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED : Receive Petition from Residents on Stinson Boulevard Between 73rd Avenu and Osborne Road . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��� e P�„ �► ............... -26B Receive Petition from Residents on �sJ "� w Hathaway Lane East of Regis Drive . . . .�.�. . �. . . . . . . . . - B �--� Resolution Ordering Improvement, � � Final Plans, and Estimates of Costs G� �l�✓ G� Thereof and Amending Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1993 - 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Resolution Ordering Improvement and Approval of Final Plans and Estimates of Costs Thereof and Adding to the 1993 Street tmprovement Project No. ST. 1993 - 1& 2: Hathaway Lane East of Regis Drive � ............... Resolution Ordering Improvement, Final Plans and Estimates of Costs Thereof and Amending: Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1993 - 1 & 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �i Cs.� �/,�� ........ 29 �8��5 ��� �ls•«.% ................... 30-30B FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING �F SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 NEW BUStNESS,�CONTlNUED): Resolution C)rdering Improvement and Approvai of Pians and Estimates of Costs thereof and Adding to the 1993 Street Improvement Project No. ST. i 993 - 1& 2: Seventh Street From Madison Street to 900 Feet West Approve Change Order No. 1, Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1993 1& 2 a� ��a-�u..J � � ..... ,��?� 31 Page 1 a .�a�Ce�.�,�.,,�� .�J . , . . . . 32 - 32C P "' �' ! Resolution Estabiishing Municipai n.�!�..� State Aid Streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 - 33B � � � �� �i Resolution Revoking Municipai State Aid Stree#s . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resolution Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Locke Park Fi�ter Plant Re air Pro'ect No 24� i�`�C'`'' �� �� .�.C�..... t ��.�G�. aN!�.�-� p, � . ....... .............. � 6� � � . K, 35 - 35B FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 10 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): Resolution Ordering Improvement and Approvai of Plans and Estimates of Costs thereof and Adding to the 1993 Street improvement Project No. ST. 1993 - 1& 2: Seventh Street From Madison Street to 900 Feet West � ���� � G ..... ,�,�5 31 Approve Change Order No. 1, Street a''C4``� Improvement Project No. ST. 1993 1 & 2 . .��- . . . . . . . 32 - 32C � �,,. Resolution Establishing Municipal �wC�t/ State Aid Streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�C � . . . . �l Resolution Revoking Municipal State Aid Streets . . . . . . . . . . . . �, . 33 - 33B . . ��� 6�et . . . 34 � � �j� Resolution Authorizing Advertisement %�N ��� for Bids for Locke Park Filter Plant Repair, Pro�ect No. 240 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � r� �� � � 35 - 35B FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 11 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED� Approve Funding for the Stream Bed and Bank Erosion Control -�� Pro�ect on the 400 Block of Rice Creek Terrace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 - 36E Authorize the Advertisement for � Bid Pro osals for the Lease/Purchase �S P of a New Sidewalk Snowplow and Accessories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 - 7G Receive Bids and Award Contract for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisifion (SCADA) Project No. 259; and, Authorize Payment for the Design of the City Surveillance Items ..... Claims � � `��._.'�3., � � , .................... 38 - 38B 39 ............. ....................... 40 �. �� � FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 12 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED : Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 - 41 H Estimates . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 .�`� -� � . � ADJOURN: ♦ �iti�enship �ay - �ePtember t�,1993 William J. Nee Mayor Fridley. MN �onstitution �ee� - �eptember 17 - 23,1993 `Wd�f ��}lS, �WetRe Peopee, did okdaiK aKd estab�isR a CoastitutioK {�ok tRe Ukited States o{� .�LwteAiCGt to SeCUke t�e beessiKc�s o� �ibexty {fok ouASe@lYes akd ouk posteAit�; akd �laid�(�i��iS, it is iw�poAtGtkt t�t CiQe Citizexs �-uQQ,� ukde�stakd tRe pkovisio�,s, pkiKeipP.es, aKd wte,aKiKc� o� tRe L'oKstitutioK so tRe�y caK suppoKt, pkesexVe akd de�exd it agaiast e,�eKOacRwte,�t; a�d �1�id�(�t��iS, tRe PAesideKt akd tRe Clokg�ess o� tRe UKited States RaU�e desic�Kated Se.pte,nbex 17, 1993, as C�.itize,�s�ip �Day, aKd tRe wee12 0{� Septe.�bex 17 - 23, 1993, as Cokstitutiok �We.e{2; a�d �l�(d�(��>4S, tRe pe.opee o{� �tRe C.'ity o� �xid2e.y do e.kjoy tRe bP,e.ssikc�s o{� �ibexty, tRe guaKaktees o� tRe BiQQ o{� 12igRts, e.qua� pAOtectiok o{� tR.e P,aw ukdex t9�e C.'o�.stitutioK, aKd tRe �Keedow�s dexiue,d. �KOw� it. .No�w, T���=�or2�, � rrr2�so��v� ta�t r, ��e�a»�J .��, Mayo� o� t�e e�ty o�- ��de�y ���y pKO���� s�t�� ��,1g�, as C�''tize,�sRip �Day a�d tRe week o{� Septe,w�beA 17 -?3, 1993, as Co�,stitutioK �We.ef2 aKd iKu�ite evexy citizeK aKd i►lstitutioK to joiK iK t�.e Cowurie.,+wKCltiok. �JI( �Wf �I(�SS �Wd�l ��0�, I Rat�e set w�y Raad a�d cause.d tRe. se.a2 0{� t�e City o� �ideey to be a{�{�ixed tRis 13tR day o{� Septe.w�bex, 1993. William J. Nee, Mayor THE MINOT88 OF TH8 RBGIILAR MESTING OF THS FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF AIIGUST 16, 1993 The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:34 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of A1Zegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson and Councilman Schneider Councilman Billings and Councilman Fitzpatrick Mayor Nee stated that Councilman Billings is on vacation. Councilman Fitzpatrick is ill, and they have both been excused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING. AUGUST 2j 1993: MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Nee requested that the estimate from Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. be added to the estimates. MOTI�N by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addition. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM. VISITORS: PRESENTATION OF PETITION NO. 13-1993 TO IMPROVE STORM WATER RUNOFF IN THE AREA OF 64TH AVENUE: Mr. Joe Nelson, 1357 64th Avenue, presented a petition to the Council to improve the storm water runoff in their area. He stated that the residents support construction of a detention pond with the pipe outi�t at the Central Avenue culvert. He also understands that the cost of this project is approximately $120,000. He stated that there is another option to construct a pipe from Mississippi Street to the Central Avenue culvert to reduce the surface water runoff, and that the cost of this project is approximately $100,000. He stated that the residents request the Council to look at this option as a remedy to their storm water problem. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MR$TING OF AIIGIIBT 16, 1993 PAGE 2 Mr. NeYson stated that the residents are requesting the Council to consider that participation in the project would be a maximum of $1,000 per residential lot. He requested that the assessment shall be based on the premise that all properties that are currently split into multiple lots, that is, two or three plots per residential address, will be assessed no more than $1,000. Mr. Nelson stated that the petition has been signed by 21 of the 38 property owners involved. He stated that when circulating this petition, he represented himself as best he could to explain the City�s position and the process. He said that this was a very difficult task and that he had to put his reputation on the line in order to get some people to sign the petition. He stated that the item he feels is the most important and non-negotiable is that the maximum assessment be $1,000. He stated that several persons are afraid the price may increase. If that occurs, he wanted the petition withdrawn. If this could not be done, he would get another petition to have this withdrawn. He stated that in regard to the split or multiple lots, three people are involved, and some of these people are retired and on fixed incomes. MOTION by Councilman Schneider ta receive Petition No. 13-1993. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Councilman Schneider stated that circulating this petition was a tremendous amount of work, and he thanked Mr. Nelson. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, what the next step would be in order to start this project. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a public hearing would have to be set for the improvement, and then this project could probably be done in conjunction with the TCAAP interconnect project. He stated that if the public hearing could be established for September 13, 1993, it would expedite the project. PETER EISENZIMMER. 6535 OAKLEY DRIVE RE: MEADOWLANDS PARK AND MISSISSIPPI AND UNIVERSITY INTERSECTION: Mr. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked when the work at Meadowlands Park would be completed. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the contractor does not work for the City but is employed by Wal-Mart. He stated that the City has asked Wal-Mart to request the contractor to complete this work. If this is not done, the City has a bond to assure that it is completed. Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that the intersection improvement at University Avenue and Mississippi Street has hurt businesses due to the fact that the turning lane was removed to access Burger King FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF AIIGIIST 16. 1993 PAGE 3 and the other businesses in that area. He felt that the businesses should have had some input if a road was to be blocked off. He stated that businesses will not succeed if there isn't an easy access. He stated that the variety store in Holly Center has already gone out of business. LOCK LAKE DAM• Mr. Leon Hinkel, 50 70th Way, asked what the cost was to replace the dam at Locke Lake. He stated that he understood the cost to be $635,000; however, the Focus reported that it was $800,000. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the cost to replace the dam itself is estimated at $635,000, but the City is looking at some other options and improvements for a fishing pier and a canoe portage which could bring the cost to about $800,000. Mr. Hinkel stated that he does not benefit from this project. He felt it was a conflict of interest for Mr. Flora, a public official, to support the project when he lives on the creek. Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Flora is implementing the Council's policy, as the Council is on record that the dam is the City's responsibility. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that a public official is someone elected by the public, and Mr. Flora is a public employee, not an elected official. She stated that the Council makes the decisions on the projects, and these are implemented by staff. Mr. Gregg Herrick, Assistant City Attorney, stated that Mr. Flora is not a public official in the sense that he has no authority to direct any e}cpenditure of funds for a project. He stated that only the City Council has the authority to direct how funds will be expended and used for the dam reconstruction. He stated that Mr. Flora is a public employee carrying out the Council's direction, and he does not see a conflict of interest. PUBLIC HEARING: 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON RECONSTRUCTION OF 7TH STREET FROM MADISON STREET TO 900 FEET WEST: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, and the public hearing opened at 7:55 p.m. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a petition was received signed by 62 percent of the residents to improve a portion of Seventh Street by widening and resurfacing the street and FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTING OF AIIGUST 16, 1993 PAGE 4 installing concrete curb and gutter. He stated that the property owners would be assessed only for the curb and gutter at a cost not to exceed $8.00 a foot. Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that Councilman Billings indicated he supported this project. No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed project. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing closed at 7:57 p.m. NEW BUSINESS• 2. PRESENTATION OF THE 1994 PRELIMINARY DRAFT BUDGET: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this preliminary draft budget is submitted in accordance with the City Charter requirement. He stated that the budget does not include any property tax levy increase. He stated that the total budget is $11,430,209, and it is balanced with the estimated revenues. Mr. Pribyl outlined the percentage of increases in the General, Special Revenue, Capital Projects, Agency, and Enterprise Funds. He stated that the total increase including all funds is 9.8 percent over the 1993 budget. Mr. Pribyl stated that a more extensive review of the budget will be done in accordance with the truth in taxation hearings which will be held in December. Mayor Nee stated that this is a balanced budget. While costs have increased, income from various sources has also increased. iie stated that the most disturbing increase is the increased charges for sewage disposal, which was very substantial. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the 1994 preliminary draft budget. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 205 ENTITLED "ZONING," BY AMENDING SECTIONS 205 07 06 205 08 06 205 09 07 AND 205.10.06, AND RENUMBERING THE REMAINING SECTIONS CONSECUTIVELY: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this ordinance amendment requires that motor vehicles be stored and parked on hard surface driveways and affects the residential zoning FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1993 PAGE 5 districts. She stated that the commercial and industrial zoning districts are not covered in this ordinance amendment as this requirement is addressed in another section of the code for those particular zoning districts. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance on first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 28, 1993• A. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #93-12, BY HOME VETERINARY SERVICE, INC. TO ALLOW AN ANIMAL HOSPITAL. GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5895 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a request for a special use permit to allow a veterinary clinic in a C-2 zoning district. She stated that certain conditions must be met for a special use permit which requires all windows in the area of the building housing animals to be double-glazed with a fixed sash, any ventilation system shall be designed so that no odors or organisms will spread between wards or to the outside area, and that there be no outside pens or holding areas. Ms. Dacy stated that the petitioner is proposing a veterinary clinic and a hospital to provide a grooming service and to board animals. She stated that the maximum capacity would be 34 dogs and cats. She stated that each ward will have a separate air exhaust with charcoal filter, and there won't be any outside housing of animals. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission was concerned about the noise and odor. She stated that the petitioner indicated there would be protection to prevent noise by adding additional wall barriers and an extensive filter and ventilation system to prevent odors. She stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this special use permit with two stipulations, which she outlined. Mayor Nee stated that Councilman Billings attended the Planning Commission meeting on this special use permit. He advised Council that he has no objection. Councilman Schneider asked the petitioner if he had plans for an outside pen or for a holding area. Dr. LeMay, the petitioner, stated that he does not have any plans for outside pens or boarding, but they may have a walking area. Ms. Dacy stated that the ordinance specifically states that outdoor pens are not permitted. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1993 PAGE 6 Dr. LeMay stated that the interior walls would be triple insulated. If there are any complaints, he would be happy to try and resolve this issue. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to grant Special Use Permit, SP #93-12, with the following stipulations: (1) general site clean-up, including repairing the fence, removing weeds located in the shrub beds, in the area adjacent to the fence and in the parking lot, addition of new rock to the shrub beds, and the pruning of trees and shrubs, shall be completed by June l, 1994; and (2) this special use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission in twelve months regarding noise and odor. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. B. SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #93-13, BY FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GEO, INC. , TO ALLOW AGENCIES TO SELL OR DISPLAY NEW AND/OR USED VEHICLES, RECREATIONAL VEHICLES OR BOATS, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7011 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.: Mayor Nee stated that Councilman Billings attended the Planning Commission meeting where this item was discussed. Councilman Billings sent a letter to the residents of Holiday Hills concerning the request. He stated that Councilman Billings indicated he would support this request for a special use permit. Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this proposed outdoor sale of vehicles would be held at the Columbia Arena, and a special use permit is required. She stated that the sale would be held on September 3, 4 and 6 over the Labor Day weekend, but there would be no Sunday sales. She stated that Friendly Chevrolet would provide a staff person for traffic control, and they would construct a tent and provide portable Satellites on the premises. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this special use permit with eleven stipulations as found in the Council's agenda. She stated that the Council has approved a similar request for Sam's Club. Ms. Dacy stated that one of the stipulations requires a barricade to be placed at the entrance to the neighborhood on 69th Avenue and on 71st Avenue and that the barricade at 69th Avenue include a sign that this is a residential area with no exit. Mayor Nee asked how residents would access their homes. Ms. Dacy stated that the person in charge of the traffic control could advise persons that there would be no test driving of vehicles, and the barricade could be strategically placed to allow access for local traffic. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked where the test driving of the vehicles would take place. She also wondered if this traffic would enter Melody Manor. FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 16. 1993 PAGg_7 Ms. Dacy stated she assumes that 69th Avenue would,be used to exit onto University Avenue, or 73rd Avenue could be used to go east to Central Avenue or west to University Avenue rather than north into Melody Manor. Councilman Schneider asked if there is an estimate on how many persons would attend this sale. Mr. Ronald Stelter, representing Friendly Chevrolet, stated it is e�ected that several hundred people would attend. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she attended the sale sponsored by Sam's Club. There were a lot of people, but the traffic was very controlled. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that one of the stipulations was that the cars for the sale be street operable and not be leaking fluid excessively. She asked if this may be a problem. Mr. Stelter stated that at the Planning Commission meeting the question was raised if this sale would involve junk vehicles. He stated that this would not be the case, and the vehicles would not be leaking fluid. He stated that they hope to have three hundred to four hundred cars from four different manufacturers. They would be moving them on this site beginning the Friday before Labor Day. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant Special Use Permit, SP #93-13, with the following stipulations: (1) the vehicle sales will occur no more than once per year for no more than three days over the Labor Day weekend; (2) the use of streamers, pennants, and flags is prohibited; (3) the petitioner shall comply with the temporary sign ordinance for all temporary signs on the property; (4) the petitioner shall obtain a temporary building permit and shall comply with Article 32 of the Uniform Fire Code; (5) the portable toilets shall be handicapped accessible; (6) the petitioner shall provide a traffic management person to properly control traffic on site and to prevent problems occurring on 69th Avenue, the University Avenue frontage road, and to direct unnecessary traffic away from the residential neighborhood; (7) the participating dealerships shall apply for and receive the appropriate City licenses; (8) there shall be no test driving of cars in the residential neighborhood located south of 69th Avenue and in Locke Park; (9) barricades shall be placed at the entrance to the neighborhood on 69th Avenue and on 71st Avenue. The barricade at 69th Avenue shall include a sign with the language "Residential Area, No Exit"; (10) the cars for the sale shall be street operable and shall not be excessively leaking fluid; and (il) the special use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to the next sale. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AOGIIST 16. 1993 PAGE 8 The Council received the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of July 28, 1993. 5. RESOLUTION NO. 56-1993 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO REFLECT INCREASED GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND INCREASED PROJECT COSTS, THE MODIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 1 THROUGH NO. 12 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT COSTS WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 13 AND THE APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING THERETO• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 56-1993 to set the public hearing for September 13, 1993. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. U.pon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. APPROVE HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY AND BRIAN KOVAR FOR THE PLACEMENT OF AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AT 7536 MCKINLEY STREET N.E. Ms . Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this property is located on the west side of McKinley Street and zoned R-1. She stated that there is an existing single-family home on the site and a six foot drainage and utility easement along the west side. She stated that the petitioner is proposing to construct a 12 foot by 16 foot detached accessory building. Ms. Dacy stated that through the building permit process, it was determined there was a ten-foot easement along the south property line, and this proposed building would encroach into the easement by seven feet. She stated that there are no City utilities within the easement. Staff contacted each of the utility companies to ensure there are no conflicts if the structure encroaches into the easement. Ms. Dacy stated that Northern States Power and Minnegasco do not have any objections to the City entering into a hold harmless agreement with the owner. Nortel Cable and U.S. West Communications called and said that they did not have any adverse comments. She stated that staff has no objection to the encroachment, and she wouZd recommend approval of the hold harmless agreement. Mayor Nee stated that the hold harmless agreement assumes the City may need the easement at some future date. Constructing the building on the easement is contingent on the property owner entering into the hold harmless agreement. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into the hold harmless agreement to allow the FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF ADGOST 16. 1993 PAG$ 9 construction of a second accessory building within the unused utility easement for the property at 7536 McKinley Street. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. APPROVE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS TO THE ANOKA COUNTY TAXSYS SYSTEM• Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that approval of this agreement would allow the City access into the County's tax system. He stated that this has been in the City's goals and objectives and now is available to connect into the County's system. He stated that there would be no cost for connecting the first unit, and any other connection would cost $50.00 each. He stated that at this time the City is considering only this one connection, so there would be no cost involved. MOTTON by Councilman Schneider to approve the license agreement for access to the Anoka County TAXSYS system. Seconded by CounciZwoman Jorgenson. Councilman Schneider stated that if someone wants tax information regarding their property, the City can access a personal computer and immediately provide this information. Mr. Pribyl stated that most of the information is available through the City Assessor's office, but this connection allows access into a computer data base so it would avoid a resident having to go to the County for tax information. Mayor Nee stated that it is possible for someone in Fridley to make an inquiry at Anoka County through the computer in regard to property taxes. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE 1.5 MILLION GALLON WATER RESERVOIR PAINTING PROJECT NO. 251: MOTYON by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for the 1.5 milZion gallon water reservoir painting project No. 251: Bidder Total Bid Central Sandblasting $40,000.00 2299 County Road H New Brighton, MN 55122 J.B. Nelson & Son $42,425.00 962 Central Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55413 FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGII$T 16, 1993 PAGE 10 TMI Coatings $49,750.00 2805 Dodd Road St. Paul, MN 55121 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that bids were opened on August 11, 1993 for this project. Three bids were received. He stated that the low bidder was Central Sandblasting in the amount of $40,000. He stated that references have been checked, and Central Sandblasting was found to be a reputable company. Mr. Flora would recommend the Council award the contract to them. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if there was any lead in the paint. Mr. Flora stated that there was none. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for the 1.5 million gallon water reservoir painting project No. 251 to the low bidder, Central Sandblasting, in the amount of $40,000. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 9. APPROVE REMOVAL OF 10 INCH ASH TREE AT THE MOORE LAKE BEACH PARKING LOT• Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that with the construction of the Moore Lake Beach parking lot, three trees need to be removed. He stated that two of these trees will be relocated, but an Ash tree needs to be removed. He stated that approval is needed from the Parks and Recreation and Planning Commissions, as well as the Council, to comply with the City Code prior to the City removing a diameter tree on City-owned property. Mr. Flora stated that the Parks and Recreation Commission members were polled. Four of the five members indicated they had no objection to removal of the tree, and the Planning Commission unanimously approved removal of the Ash tree with the condition that two additional trees be planted at the park to replace the one removed and that the new trees conform with City ordinance requirements. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the removal of the ten- inch Ash tree at the Moore Lake Beach parking lot, with the condition that two additional trees be planted at the park to replace this tree and that the new trees conform with City ordinance requirements. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGOST 16. 1993 PAGE il 10. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO 1, CORRIDOR MAINTENANCE PROJECT NO. 243• Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that in closing this project, it was found that the City had to pay a 6.5 percent sales tax on the total contract. He stated that this change order covers the sales tax. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. 1 with Innovative Irrigation for Corridor Maintenance Project No. 243 in the amount of $971.56. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 57-1993 AUTHORIZING THE ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS FOR THE SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA AC4UISITION (SCADA) SYSTEM, PROJECT NO. 259: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that this supervisory control and data acquisition system is associated with the TCAAP interconnect project. He stated that plans and specifications include an addendum bid for surveillance and meter instrumentation for well houses 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 13. These items are a City addition and City cost responsibility. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 57-1993 with the addendum for surveillance and meter instrumentation for the well houses. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY, PARKS AND RECREATION: Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that Mr. Jack Kirk, Director of Recreation and Natural Resources, is present to comment and answer questions raised by the Council at the last meeting pertaining to CDBG funds for the City's Park and Recreation Department. He stated that Mr. Kirk has talked to him about some new approaches to this program that would allow a12 schoo2 districts in the City to participate. Mr. Kirk stated that he discussed the Council's concerns with Mr. Burns, the City Manager, and the alternative is to welcome and encourage students from the other school districts to participate in this program. He stated that this is a pilot program, and hopefully it can be expanded in the future. Mr. Kirk stated that the City's seasonal brochure is mailed to all. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGUST 16, 1993 PAGE 12 residents of the City, and this program would be advertised to invite students that are not part of School District No. 14 to participate. He stated that he has contacted the school districts, and he believed mailing addresses of students eligible for this program could be obtained. The City would be sending them an invitational flyer explaining the program so they know what activities would be offered. Mr. Kirk stated that there are about 913 middle school age youths and 619 of those are in School District 14. This is about 68 percent. He stated that approximately three hundred middle school youths are in the other three school districts, and a flyer would be sent to those individuals. He stated that the Youth Advisory Council would also like representation from students outside of School District No. 14. Mr. Kirk stated that Spring Lake Park and the Anoka Hennepin School Districts have a program for their middle school students and an activity bus. He stated that the Columbia Heights students do not have an after school program and he has contacted representatives from the Columbia Heights School District. He stated that the Columbia Heights School District boundary is only a few blocks from the Fridley School District boundary, and it appears the students will have an opportunity to take a bus to the Fridley Middle School to take part in the program. He stated that he is checking into this further. Councilman Schneider stated that when the program was presented to the Council, it was unclear of the school district's part. He stated that he understood their facilities were quite limited. Mr. Kirk stated it is known that the gymnasiums are heavily used, but there are a number of other facilities. He stated that the computer labs, swimming pool, art and music rooms, and general classrooms are some of the facilities that would be available for activities. He stated that another option is using the facilities at St. Phillip's Church, as they have indicated a wilZingness to participate in the program. He stated that some of the preliminary activities which have been identified involve trips, enrichment programs in a foreign language, computers, art or music. He stated that as of this date, there are no set programs and it is believed the ideas and wishes of the students are needed in order for the program to be successful. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the program would be only for the school year or also during the summer months. Mr. Kirk stated that he would like to continue the program through the summer months. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is concern to expand the recreation program in the northwest area of the City and get the FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AUGIIST 16. 1993 PAG$ 13 youth involved. She stated that a letter addressed to Councilman Billings from Ken Phelps was received regarding the issue of how to get these programs city-wide. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she attended a meeting of the Steering Committee last Wednesday to address some of the concerns. She stated that the canclusion was to proceed with the program and get the information out to the school districts in order to involve as many youths as possible and to get the students at risk involved in these programs. Mr. Kirk felt that the school personnel and teachers may be able to identify those students who may benefit from the program, and there may be an opportunity to provide a voucher to encourage these students to participate. He felt that personal contact by a teacher may get them involved. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there seems to be a great deal of territorial boundaries that go alonq with the school districts. She wondered how the students could be brought together. Mr. Kirk stated that he felt this was difficult to answer, as there could be some territorial concerns in bringing students from one school to another. He felt that the instructors in the programs should be made aware of this issue, and it would have to be addressed as they proceed with the program. Councilman Schneider stated that he discussed the program with the Principal of the Middle School of District No. 14, Margaret Leibfried, and he feels much more comfortable with the program. He stated that he would like to make this an entire community project, as the schools have a binding effect on the community, and this may be an opportunity to bring the community together as a whole. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive the letter from Ken Phelps, 1513 Berne Road. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12A. SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT ON 64TH AVENUE: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to suspend the rules in order to introduce a motion to set the public hearing on the improvement on 64th Avenue pertaining to storm water as requested in the petition submitted this evening. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set a public hearing on the 64th Avenue stona improvement project for September 13, 1993. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting FRIDLSY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 16. 1993 PAGE 14 aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 13. CLAIMS• MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claim Nos. 50894 through 51181. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 14. LICENSES• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as submitted: Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt 900 Meritor Tower 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Legal Services Rendered April and May, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,287.80 Gunderson Brothers 2325 Snelling Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55404 Removal and Replacement of Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project No. 245 Estimate No. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1, 333. 38 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. 1451 County Road 18 Shakopee, MN 55379 1993 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1993 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $69, 564.70 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTING OF AIIGIIST 16, 1993 PAGE 15 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the following additional estimate: Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard N.W. 400 Northtown Financial Plaza Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Statement for Services Rendered for the Month of July, 1993 as City Attorney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,112.48 Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 16, 1993 adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad William J. Nee Secretary to the City Council Mayor Approved: I _ � Community Development Department P G DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 10, 1993 TO: William Burns, City Manager ��. � FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Public Hearing to Amend Redevelopment Plan and Establish Tax Increment District No. 13 The City Council established September 13, 1993 as the public hearing to amend the redevelopment plan and create Tax Increment District No. 13 for a parcel at the northwest corner of 51st Way and Industrial Boulevard. ECO Finishing, Inc., is proposing to construct a 29,000 square foot manufacturing facility. The City Council should conduct the public hearing. Action on the resolution creating the district is scheduled for the September 27, 1993 meeting. BD/dn M-93-521 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF FRIDLEY COUNTY OF ANOKA STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the City Council of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 13, 1993 commencing at 7:30 o'clock p.m. at City Hall, 6431 University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, relating to the approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for the Housing & Redevelopment Authority's Redevelopment Project No. l, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.074, inclusive. The hearing is also relative to the approval and adoption of Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for the City's Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 12 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive. The hearing is further relative to the establishment of proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 and the approval and adoption of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive. Copies of the documentation relating to the above proposed actions will be on file and available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office. The property proposed to be included in the Tax Increment Financing District is described below and set forth on the attached map. Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 includes the following P.I.N.: 27-30-24-12-0002 and is legally described as Lot 1, Block 5, Great Northern Industrial Center and is generally located at the corner of 51st Way and Industrial Boulevard All interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their views orally or in writing. Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than September 6, 1993. Publish: August 31, 1993 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1s\ William Burns City Manager (insert map) �Q \ � \ V � J `� �., N//2 SEC. 27, T.30, f?.24 �� C/TY OF FR/OLEY . ..:r - ;_ �. r / � � F� `. .j_ . �.i ' � . � . �i._I . � � _ j d�lC�_ -O. '- ....... � 1 '.' _ � 1 \ V J ` \ � .� � � � � � C`^ � I v7 � �: � f� � � fi' � � j� � � � I ! 2� ; �• � � / } �[ /�,i � � �a � J -- . I N O. 79 -- � � 6 a=�� �' ` � UN/TEO STA`TES Of AiL.'ER/CiO ,. ja� r�.i . Op 4 ;�,�' " � , - �`' �— �� . ., o. .�._. .f. ceNrEa sec n -� �' . 24 3 I = (^� ' � OUiiOT . ia' 1� �: �NH( �-.- OUTLO71 � �J Sa R �nor ' � o� ,� . Eng��ieer�ng Sewer L'Valer Parks Slrcets Maintena��ce MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �� PW93-272 � FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director DATE: July 28, 1993 SUBJECT: 64th Storm Water Project On Tuesday, July 27, 1993, I held a public meeting with the residents in the 64th area regarding their surface water problem. Twenty-five people attended the meeting, representing 16 residences. Councilwoman Jorgenson was also in attendance. At the meeting, I explained the purpose and a proposal to deal with a 10-year storm design. Three options were covered: (1) a detention pond draining directly south into the wetland area by the Harris Pond ditch, (2) a detention pond with a pipe outlet at 64th and Central Avenue, and (3) a detention pond with the pipe outlet at the Harris Pond ditch Central Avenue culvert. The cost options for the project were $72,000, $100,000 and $120,000. During the discussion, it was suggested that the Mississippi culvert be extended directly to the Central Avenue culvert in lieu to a detention pond. We had not looked at this, but we will determine a cost for this option. This option would remove all of the drainage north of Mississippi which would have a favorable impact in the area. The consensus of the attendees supported the construction of a detention pond and providing a pipe outlet to the Central Avenue culvert. We had some discussion about residents participation in funding the project. I outlined the City's 1973 policy and indicated that if the Council would look at it, they would probably adjust the $800 figure to approximately $1,000. The residents requested that I draw up a petition which they propose to walk through the neighborhood in an attempt to obtain signatures in excess of 50% for a project to submit to the Council for inclusion in this year's construction program. JGF:cz � � €�'�°� AME �� - 64TH STORM WATER MEETING JULY 27, 1993 ADDRESS-- ___._ TELEPHONE # - ��%� � � ;�� � �- r �" / � Jh�J ��. � �� � �� ��S - ._ � � , :.�. -� � � ' �;,�: p.� ) �'/ "���-,.�;�� � � ,� J %= L�; �l �- �%�. � � I -�. �:� i - ; ; � � / � ���� � y���- ���� �:; �� �; _�: �, ��=��; >. � �. . � ; �_ � � �, <, � �`�%')�-i�--n 5�,�-i--�`` -ll•-L.I,'�L t.��..1 � � �' ' ��' Y -''' �TG `-r ��=�`� r � �� " -� � � S� ._. ,��/� � ,���� t-�s; :-� !� �/�/ � �,� ,� � � I �' � ���r � �o� � �- � ✓ l �l � � � / , j �� ` � �� ,T,,� � ;', i� , ` / Jr r i �� � ' L S`,- i L\--�-� �� s �' ; �- �� �: ; �\ � � �_ , � �. �� _ . � ; ��c � . � � ,� , �. \ � \ �'` "�vv `;- �� L ( ��i �\ , ��; . _ . 2A !b I � _ � . Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 9, 1993 � TO: William Burns, City Manager �� FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development.Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Second Reading of an Ordinance Declaring Certain Real Estate to be Surplus; Vacated Broad Avenue and Lot 26, Block C, Riverview Heights The City Council held the first reading of the attached ordinance at its August 2, 1993 meeting. The City Council directed staff to revise the preliminary bikeway alignment. Attached is the revised alignment plan. Adjustments will need to be made in the field to ensure that the transition points in Coon Rapids and at the intersection of Broad Avenue and Lafayette Street are smooth. Staff recommends that the City Council hold the second reading of the attached ordinance declaring the combined right-of-way and Lot 26 as surplus and authorizing its sale. MM/dn M-93-479 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF SECTION 1 The City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract of land within the City of Fridley, Anoka County, State of Minnesota, described as follows: Lot 26, Block C, Riverview Heights, Anoka County, Minnesota, and that part of all of the vacated Broad Avenue N.E., lying southerly of the westerly extension of the northerly line and northerly of the westerly extension of the southerly line of Lot 26. Reserving and subject to easements for bikeway and walkway purposes in favor of the City of Fridley, over the west 15 feet and the northerly 10 feet thereof, and northwesterly of a line drawn from points distant 12.0 feet southerly and northeasterly of the intersection point of the interior easement lines. Generally located north of Lafayette Street and south of Mississippi Boulevard. All lying in the North Half of Section 3, Township 30, Range 24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka, State of Minnesota. SECTION 2 It is hereby determined by the City Council that the City no longer has any reason to continue to own said property, and the City Council is hereby authorized to sell or enter into a contract to sell said property. SECTION 3 The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the necessary contracts and deeds to affect the sale of said property. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1993. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR First Reading: August 2, 1993 Second Reading: Publication: � [i' � N �� � �' E J -�� �--- - � U � I`� N � U � �� ..� � � ����� -� �. , '15"�� 9�_3,� � W X�. � U z �. � w � � � � x' � � z �-- � � � 2 z Qx _ U X 1�E 9'-10" G �N � 6 5 -' .�� � � �� �z M 52- ��.. 'v 104°58'15" C � � � � � I , I -�_. � �''- Z.� � , 105D 1 a' S5" M = � 0 0 �o P , �� ��,n�� �w�Y �U �N N�t EI�Tr' �� 612 788 7602 SEP-09-1993 09�36 FROM Kurth Surveying CERTIFtCAYE OF : FOR LtT�C oF Ftz�v��Y 1 NEqEtlY CEPTIFY-i11�T TH1S iuRVtY, PIAN, OR REPORT WAS MEhwHED tlY�ME OR UNOER O�NECT SYPENVISION ANCTNAT 1 AM A ONLY NE EOIA O uHVE Y N LAwSOFTNESTAT��OF YIMI1EYCiA. MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO. � �>0 ' R.IW .�:: ��� gypAO AVCs1dJL='� r> � ��, l , ��., . " � qi5�� �.Np , � .���� ��� - � � , _ � � � t f � � N ! 1 ` I'T � b\ •: \� .-�� ,Z.��-- � �� / �r � `-'� . ` � � � , �� ��1 � !.— ~ � 1 -.. 7I " � `�' +`� i' � �-�� - g� _ i -' �� ; . `, � � ;� - � � 1 � `� � � � � t 3 �-- i�� .J � x � - =:. � � � l 'l/ � �� 3 ��� j-`- �: , t �' ;ri � � � � 1 ^ '�,' 1 � � �% � � - - ,�.� � �? , � � � � , � . 7 ': , � ' �. tn '1 c' � e p�' `Q, '/ ; . � ^h v s,a r: •; ' \��: � ;. � � � ��� ��,� il > _i � .� Ib J � ; � i � N i I � l� LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 26, Block C, RIVERVIEW I�IGHT3, Anoka Coun all of the vacated Broad Averiue N:£., lying so' of the northerly line and northerly of the wes line of said Lot 26. � Reserving and subject to easements for bikeway the City of Fridley, over the uesterly 15 feet thereof, and northwesterly of a li.ne drawn fro� and northeasterly of the intersection po�f TO 5711287 P.02 RVEY � KURTH SURV£YING INC: 4002 JEfFERSON STRE£T N.E. COlUM81A MEIGMTS MINNESOTA SII421 siz-�a�-aaca OATE i:8"�3 SCALE 1"� �� O•IRON MONUMENT 4G'C OEARINOi ARE ON AN -- � ASSNME� OATNM •� �� � •s�ROa noNU�T FooNo ,�� (Q)=PLAT aS?AN(.� (�y►�G�15uiCG0 I/�/� 1 / .+�� j r"� \ .� �� L J ..- ,� . .. - r' ' '� _;-`. J " � � ;� tr� \ .� i � ,5 � i 'a. � � 6 S J �°.� �% � 15'S � : �. t' � , -� , r � .� � s ' ��� o°/ � i i. � , � . �i � r �KO• ��`~ / / Minnesota, and that part of rly of the westerly extension y extension of the southerly walkway purposes in favor of the northerly 10 feet nts distant 12.0 feet southerly interior easement lines. __ S3-ty � r _ � Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 9, 1993 TO: William Burns, City Manager ��. � FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Steven Barg, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending Fridley City Code Chapter 205, Entitled "Zoning", by Amending Sections 205.07.06, 205.08.06, 205.09.07, and 205.10.06, and Renumbering Consecutive Sections The City Council conducted a public hearing regarding the attached ordinance amendment at its August 2, 1993 meeting. The proposed ordinance amendment creates a tie between parking facilities and parking behavior by requiring that all parking in residential districts occur on the required hardsurface parking stalls. On June 23, 1993, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing concerning the proposed ordinance amendment. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend the City Council approve the proposed ordinance amendment. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second and final reading of the attached ordinance amendment. SB/dn M-93-517 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 205, ENTITLED "ZONING", BY AMENDING SECTIONS 205.07.06, 205.08.06, 205.09.07, AND 205.10.06, AND RENUMBERING THE REMAINING SECTIONS CONSECUTIVELY The Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: 205.07. R-1 ONE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT REGULATIONS 6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS B. Prohibited Parking. � No outside parking or storage of motor vehicles shall occur except on approved hardsurface driveways and parking stalls. � 205.08. R-2 TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT REGULATIONS 6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS B. Prohibited Parking. No outside parking or storage of motor vehicles shall occur except on approved hardsurface driveways and parking stalls. 205.09. R-3 GENERAL MULTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT REGULATIONS 7. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS B. Prohibited Parking. No outside parking or storage of motor vehicles shall occur except on approved hardsurface driveways and parking stalls. 205.10. R-4 MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT REGULATIONS 6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS B. Prohibited Parking. No outside parking or storage of motor vehicles shall occur except on approved hardsurface driveways and parking stalls. � � Ordinance No. Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1993. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR Public Hearing: August 2, 1993 First Reading: August 16, 1993 Second Reading: Publication: � • r._-- 5 1/ii�,' g' � ,;,�.�\\\ ��j- - - �'���� � ' � {�. � ��. \�� r ��l DATE JULY 7 FROM pTTRT,T� SUBJECT POLICE DEPARTMENT 1993 City of Fridley Minnesota CITY CODE, CHAPTER 102 AMENDMENT MEMORANDUM TO BILL BURNS The attached amendment to the Fridley City Code Chapter 102 entitled "Police" is submitted for Council consideration. ACTION INFO X The amendment is desirable to accommodate a position classification change due to my retirement from "Assistant City Manager/Public Safety Director" to "Public Safety Director." JPH/sa l•: � i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE, CHAPTER 102 ENTITLED "POLICE," BY AMENDING SECTION 102.03 The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows: 102.b3. ABOLISHMENT OF THE POSITION OF CHIEF OF POLICE The office of Chief of Police of the City of Fridley is hereby abolished and the duties of said office are assigned to and combined with the duties of the �i�-t-a�rt -E���-�age�/Public Safety Director. (Ref. 575) Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this day oF 1993. Attest: William A. Champa, City Clerk First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: . � William J. Nee - Mayor f 4 CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R A N D II M ,��• TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �!�� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCE DIRBCTOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA� CITY CLERR SIIBJECT: MINNESOTA LAWFIIL GAMBLING PRFMISE PERMIT RENFWAL APPLICATION FOR FRIDLEY JAYCEES AT SANDEES RESTAIIRANT DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1993 Attached is a resolution approving the renewal application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit for Fridley Jaycees at Sandees Restaurant located at 6490 Central Avenue. The Minnesota Gambling Control Board requires the adoption of a resolution approving or denying this premise permit renewal application. These applications expire every two years. 7 RF,�OLir!'I�T 1�U. - 2993 •I:r� • 1 •! � � 1 ' ' �1'.I •1' �+� •: ' � • 1� I I�ti=• v� � r• i: � •�:,� �:�� •:,�•� � • u �+:�:,ti Wf�2EA.S, the City of Fridley has been served with a ca�y of a Rex�nral Ap�lication for a Minnesota I�wful Gambling Premise Fermit for Fridley Jaycees; and Wf�REAS, the location of the Premise P�ermit is for Saridees Restaurant, 6490 Central Avenue; aryd Wf�S, the City of FYidley has nat four�d ariy reason to restrict the location for the chari�able gambling operati�. NOW, Ti�F+ORE, BE IT FtESOLUID, that the City Council of the City of Fridley appraves the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Pre�nise P�ermit to Fridley Jayaees. PASSED AND ADOP'I'ED BY � CITY C7C�lNCIL OF � CI'I'Y OF FRIDIEY TFIIS 13'Iii DAY OF SEPI�II2, 1993. ' rvM��.�� WILLIAM A. C�iAMPA - CITY CL�RK . 7A WILLIAM J. 1� - MAYOR CITY OF FRIDLEY M E M O R A N D II M TO: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �n'a FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCE DIRECTOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERR SIIBJECT: MINNESOTA LAWFIIL GAMBLING PREMISE PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR FRIDLEY JAYC13E8 AT JOE DIMAGGIOS DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1993 Attached is a resolution approving the renewal application for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit for Fridley Jaycees at Joe Dimaggios Restaurant located at 1298 East Moore Lake Drive. The Minnesota Gambling Control Board requires the adoption of a resolution approving or denying this premise permit renewal application. These applications expire every two years. E�� RES07�TPI�iT I�U. - 1993 i•�:�_ • i •; � : � • • •�•� •i- v� • • • • n � i:,� • v• • ^i � r• i:i � • •�� � :�: • :,i•� � • • n ��� �EAS, the City of Fridley has been setved with a copy of a R�enew�al Application for a Minnesota Iawful Gambling Premise P�ermit for Fridley Jayoees; ar�d �E'.AS, the location of the Preqnise P�ermit is for Joe DiMaggios Restaurant, 1298 East Moore Iake Drive; arra W�REAS, the City of Fridley has not fcauxi arty reason to restrict the location for the charitable gambling c�peration. NO�W, Tf�REFnRE, B� IT RFSOLUED, that the City Cbuncil of the City of Fridley ap�raves the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Pr�nise Permit to Fridley Jayoees. PASSID AND ADOPTID BY Zi� CITY CX7[7NCII, OF Zi� QTY OF FRIDI�Y TI�S 13TH DAY OF SEPl'II�ER, 1993. � �, ►• i. . 44 i+ x; �/ . � �• � WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR � _ � . DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department P�vrriNG DrvISION City of Fridley September 9, 1993 � . William Burns, City Manager ,�.� Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Steven Barg, Planning Assistant Junk Yard License Renewal/Sam's Auto Parts On May 3, 1993, the City Council tabled consideration junk yard license renewal for Sam's Auto Parts due parking concern. On June 7, 1993, the City Counc. temporary 90 day license enabling Sam's Auto Part: operating its business through the summer months. Th� directed staff to work with the property owner to issue, and further added that the matter should be September for issuance of the regular annual license regarding revocation of Sam's special use permit. of the annual to an ongoing il approved a � to continue a City Council resolve this considered in or discussion In mid-June, staff inet with Sam Giddings, owner of Sam's Auto Parts. At that time, Mr. Giddings indicated that he woul.d make an effort to keep the customer and employee parking areas clear and work to ensure that vehicles brought to their business were placed inside the junk yard fence as soon as possible. During the past month, staff has monitored this site to determ�ne whether or not an on-street parking problem exists. Although some inspections revealed that 7-9 vehicles were parked on 73 1/2 Avenue near Sam's, they were divided between the two sides of the 73 1/2 Avenue and spaced such that the street was not unduly congested and individual vehicles did not appear to be parked for excessive periods of time. Based on these observations, it is staff's opinion that there is not an on-street parking problem which is significant enough to warrant revocation of Sam's special use permit at this time. (I have attached a table showing the informatior. recorded during these recent site inspections.) Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the junk yard license renewal for Sam's Auto Parts at its September 13, 1993 meeting. This license will ailow Sam's to operate through April 30, 1994. During this time, staff will continue to conduct periodic inspections on 73 1/2 Avenue and will update the City Council regarding further problems. SB/dn M-93-519 CONDITIONS OBSERVED ON 73RD AVENUE N.E. (Both sides of the street near Sam's Auto Parts) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Date Time Number of Vehicles Observed ---------------------------------------------------------------- 8/18/93 8/21/93 8/22/93 8/24/93 8/27/93 8/28/93 8/28/93 8/29/93 9/7/93 2:45 p.m. 6:00 p.m. 12:20 p.m. 11:30 a.m. 11:15 a.m. 1:30 p.m. 6:30 p.m. 5:00 p.m. 10:30 a.m. Nine Zero Zero Seven Eight * Fifteen Zero Three Eight * Vehicles observed during this inspection have been confirmed to have been the responsibility of Fridley Auto Parts. Apparently, Fridley Auto Parts had a special delive�� ofy�" � _(,,.%.�c� �_�- � .� � / -t� f��tii� ���_/ �' �,-i� �_�c.�.� �� �'' U'°-�-..� Q-z�,�L�'�-ri7 �r% a� � �--.� _ �� 9A � ��._-� �� � , CITY OF FRIDLEY CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Stouffer called the July 18, 1993, CATV Advisory Commission meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ralph Stouffer, Robert Scott, Burt Weaver, Paul Kaspszak � Members Absent: None � Others Present: Clyde Moravetz, City of Fridley Mark Hammerstrom, Nartel Cable Dave Harvett, Media & Communications, Fridley Schools Bill Willis, 1663-68th Avenue NE, Fridley, Minnesota APPROVAL OF APRIL 28 1993 CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Weaver, to approve the April 28, 1993, CATV Advisory Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOIIFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. - APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mr. Stouffer suggested the addition of an Open Microphone for Mr. Willis prior to agenda Item I and, under V. Other Business, the addition of the Recognition of Service for Duane Peterson. MOTION by Mr. Weaver, seconded by Mr. Scott, to approve the agenda as amended. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOIIFFER DECLARED T8E MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. OPEN MICROPHONE: Mr. Willis stated he came to the meeting because he is a new resident, and he had read there was a cable commission. He has been a subscriber of cable services around the Twin Cities and has been involved in one form or another since it started. Primariiy, he is an interested citizen who is present to see what goes on, � �"— CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE Z what authority the Commission has, and the City's relationship with Nortel. He is also interested in seeing the services improved. He has seen problems in the three months he has had service here and has concerns. Mr. Stouffer provided an overview of the Commission which is an advisory commission to the City Council. The Commission oversees the rules and regulations governing cable in the city. Nortel has a 15-year franchise which goes to 2003. Nortel is now in its sixth year of service. Mr. Kaspszak stated the Commission is advisory. There is no final authority here. Mr. Moravetz stated the Commission meets quarterly on the fourth Wednesday of January, April, July and October. Mr. Scott provided information on the Fridley Communications Workshop. Mr. Moravetz can provide additional information if interested. Mr. Willis stated he had noted interesting information on the public access channel. He is at the meeting on a learning basis, and he will participate as much as is allowed. I. NORTEL REPORTS A. 2nd Quarter 1993 Franchise Fee Mr. Moravetz stated information on the second quarter franchise fee was included with the agenda. There was an error in the payment which will be adjusted in the next payment. As previously requested, Nortel has provided a comparison with earlier quarters. Mr. Stouffer asked if the number of customers has reached a plateau. Mr. Hammerstrom stated the maximum number of subscribers in the City was about 5,200. This drifts somewhat but is a steady system. Mr. Stouffer asked how the $2.U0 coupon went. Mr. Hammerstrom stated it went fairly well. Even with the coupon, the response depends on the titles. It probably pushed the buy rates up 1% or 2�. MOTION by Mr. Weaver, seconded by Mr. Scott, to receive the 2nd Quarter Franchise Fee. 10A CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28. 1993 PAGE 3 IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOIIFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. B. Update of Five Year Renegotiation and Evaluation of Franchise Report Mr. Moravetz stated that on April 28, the CATV Commission approved the five-year review and evaluation. The City Council received it with no further action. The franchise mandate for the five-year evaluation is essentially closed. II. LETTER FROM DR. RENS, SCHOOL DISTRICT #14 SUPERINTENDENT, DATED JUNE 24, 1993: a. Receive MOTION by Mr. Kaspszak, seconded by Mr. Weaver, to receive the letter from Dr. Rens, School District #14 Superintendent, dated June 24, 1993. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOOFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. b. Evaluate and Make Recommendation to Councii Mr. Kaspszak stated that in dealing with this agenda item, he will be as objective in approaching this matter as is humanly possible; and he would hope that the City Council would also approach this issue as objectively as possible. Mr. Stouffer suggested the Commission members first discuss any concerns and then receive comments from staff. Mr. Weaver suggested Mr. Harvett provide an opening statement. Mr. Harvett stated he thought this proposal will help the schools, not only within the schools but also the community, by having a new character generator and the information on that character generator. They can keep it more updated and allow more information on the channel. The school does not have that capability now. What is there now is behind the times, needs to be updated, and that is what they are trying to do. Even if the request were approved, the school would not have 24-hour programming overnight. They need to first get the equipment and go from there. They now have the technology of a camcorder. They use, and have used in 1: CATV ADVIBORY COMMI88ION MESTING� JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 4 the past, the Fridley public access. They run into transportation liability. In the past, students drove to the Fridley facility with a permission note from their parents. The schools are no longer able to do that so they now must rent a bus which is costly for transferring students four blocks. Mr. Kaspszak asked why this changed. Mr. Harvett stated the funds are not there for trans- ferring students. Mr. Moravetz suggested the policy for transferring students was a change made by the new high school principal last year. Mr. Kaspszak asked how students from Totino-Grace get to the Nortel facility. Mr. Harvett stated he did not know. Mr. Scott stated it is four blocks from the high school to Nortel facility. Can the students not walk? Mr. Harvett stated that if you are trying to run a course on 20th Century Communications and have that equipment there during a free hour or before and after school, having the students walk to the facility is not feasible. By doing this, they are not trying to duplicate what public access is offering. They are trying to get a start of that technology and then flow students over to public access. Mr. Scott has if they were planning to build a studio facility at the high school. Mr. Harvett stated this has been discussed. This would be an ideal plan, but it may not happen. Mr. Scott asked if 20th Century Communications is a required course. Mr. Harvett stated it is not a required course. Yt is an elective English course students can take which includes various productions and radio communications. In this course at the present time, they are talking about the technology available. They would like to provide some hands-on experience with that technology. Not evsry student that takes the course is going to have the interest as other students. 10C CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 5 Mr. Kaspszak asked what makes the Scala character generator more user-friendly and what currently prohibits students from putting information on the current generator. • Mr. Harvett stated the students use an Apple II-GS which is a computer, not a character generator. When we first put that in, we were told they were going to buy upgrade software. This has not happened. To use, a person must format a background, a border and every line individ- ually. Each time you run out of space, that line must be re�ormatted. One could spend 15-20 minutes on a high data page before having one page prepared. By the time it is shut down off the channel, place the tape, etc., there is not enough time to work with the students. This unit is not user-friendly. Mr. Moravetz asked how old this character generator was. Mr. Harvett stated he did not know the age. It is an Apple II-GS computer using the software, Slide Show. They have used the software for approximately six years. They have had calls from the community that this is not updated fast enough because there is not enough time to spend on updating. They are trying to get more information out but are limited with what we can do. Mr. Kaspszak asked what kind of information would people be requesting. Mr. Harvett stated they ask for lunch menus, sporting events, school closings, etc. Rather than have several calls, this information could be placed on the channel. The equipment would also make the channel easier and friendlier to watch. Mr. Scott stated this then is basically a school bulletin board function. Mr. Harvett stated this would be displayed on the educational access channel. Mr. Scott stated this could be printed in the Focus. Mr. Harvett stated, yes, it could, but there is other information they would like to be able to do on a quick basis rather than send it in one day per week to try to get this information up. In trying to shut down the system, if the system crashes, all memory is lost. They would like to be able to save the information and update it on a regular basis. 10D CATV ADVISORY COMMiSBION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 6 Mr. Kaspszak asked if this is something that the school has been building towards for a long time or has tried other ways of getting this equipment. How long has this been a problem and how long have people struggling with it? This is the first time he had heard there was a problem. Mr. Harvett stated they have been trying to get a character generator for some time. Each time they propose it to a new place, we try to stay up to date and cost efficient. They are trying to get something that will change. With this equipment, we can add to it by changing the software. There are other options out there. Mr. Moravetz asked the rationale in the budget process over the years. The request is for approximately $3,000 which is less than .l� of the school district's budget. Mr. Harvett stated he is not involved in the budget process. Dr. Rens would be able to answer that question. This request was proposed to the VFW and, he thought, the Lions Club in the past few years. Mr. Kaspszak stated he was concerned about INET. INET is not being used. Is there any other equipment the school has gotten which is not being used? His concern is that there is a limited budget and that the funds will be spent on equipment and this equipment will just sit there. What assurances are there that this will be use'd and that this is a good investment? � � Mr. Harvett stated he did not think there is anything in writing that would do that. There are students who have personally purchased equipment and brought it in to do this type of work and, for some reason, they lose interest by the time it gets to public access. There is nothing in writing that shows the number of students that will use the equipment for a specified number of hours. But, the need is there. Mr. Kaspszak stated INET was built and has not been used. If there any other pieces of equipment not being used? Mr. Harvett stated they are looking at using INET with the computer and video hook-ups, if it will transfer. Mr. Moravetz asked if there was money in the 1993-94 budget for that. 10E CATV ADVI$ORY COMMISSION M$$TING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE ? Mr. Harvett stated he could not answer that question. If there are funds, it would come out of the computer technology area. Mr. Moravetz asked if the computer technology area of the budget had been significantly increased over the last few years. Mr. Harvett stated he did not know. He does know that capital has been cut in some cases to zero, but he did not-know what is happening in other departments. He does not have that information. Mr. Weaver stated Mr. Harvett had said they do not have the facilities in place to use more equipment. Is there space to house this equipment? Mr. Harvett stated this would replace the existing character generator in the same amount of space. Mr. Weaver stated the character generator amounts to approximately $3,300. It looks as if the request is for $14,700. What about the editing equipment? Where is that to be placed? Mr. Harvett stated it wduld be placed in the media center also. Mr. Weaver asked if the media center was a drop in place for students or are classes scheduled to use this equipment. Mr. Harvett stated that at this point, there are no scheduled classes to use this equipment, because we do not have the equipment. They cannot propose a class without it. Mr. Weaver asked what is the school district's budget level for funding this effort. They are talking about some school functions. He is trying to determine how dedicated the school is for this. Have they set aside a special amount of money to hire someone or are they still in a start up mode? Mr. Harvett stated the plan is to train students and staff under his supervision. Mr. Weaver stated it had been mentioned that the school had been to the VFW and Lions Club also for this funding. What has been their response to this request? 10F CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 8 Mr. Harvett stated he did not know their response. Mr. Moravetz asked that in his discussions with Dr. Rens, has the school district put aside funds such as matching funds. Mr. Harvett stated he did not know. Mr. Weaver requested Mr. Harvett to tell how the proposed equipment would increas� the use by the school. What capabilities will this give you and how would you project the increase in the use? Mr. Harvett stated the plan initialZy is to get involved 1) within the classrooms, 2) within the student interests, and 3) in other classes rather English and 20th Century Communication classes. Then, open it up to social studies where students could do a video project. Now students have the capability to shoot a project but no other ability. They would extend that ability to use new technology and hands on learning with the students. We would open it up to the middle schools and elementary schools. Like the other channels, when it is not being used, open it up for other channels for access. Mr. Weaver stated what he had in mind with the term, existing capability,.was the use of the existing INET. He did not notice anything mentioned that this will be used. Mr. Harvett stated this has This would be used for the The INET is a closed system the community. nothing to do with the INET. programming on the channel. where it is not going out to Mr. Weaver stated INET interconnects the schools but not necessarily the schools to the community. Mr. Scott stated item #2 in Dr. Rens letter taZks about the fact that you have camcorders to shoot video and refers to classroom projects. Mr. Scott is assuming this is talking about projects using camcorders. Mr. Harvett stated, yes, camcorders are used for health classes, English classes, social studies classes, etc. Camcorders are used throughout the system. They may be used for personal projects, to videotape a class, staff development meetings, etc. Mr. Scott stated this sounds as if it is for classroom activities for which students are getting credit, just 10G CATV ADVISORY COMMIS$ION MEBTING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 9 as they have desks, blackboards, chalk, etc. Dr. Rens states that there would be increased educational access to the community but he has not heard any mention of that. He asked if some of these student projects might be cable-cast on Channel 32. Mr. Harvett stated this is correct. Mr. Moravetz asked if the proposed equipment would be more af a switcher-type of operation as opposed to editing. Mr. Harvett stated it could be set up as a type of switcher but it can also be used as a post-production editor. Mr. Weaver stated, theoretically, let us say that you do get this plan underway. What would the school's capability bring to the community that does not already exist with the Workshop? Mr. Harvett stated this would happen by showing the proj ects or some other ideas that would occur from having this equipment. There are going to be more doors that this equipment will open up rather than what we are now doing. If someone records, for example, the fifth grade concert in Stevenson that public access is not covering, they can take that tape back, edit and title it. These are the types of things they would like to start doing. Mr. Weaver stated it is then not possible for the school to get equipment on loan from the Workshop, go to the school and videotape, use the existing editing capability and then have that broadcast. Is there some shortcoming of that system that prohibits the school from using the equipment? Mr. Harvett stated, no. The school has an organizational membership with them and we can use their equipment when we schedule it. They cannot take that equipment to the high school and edit within the high school. Mr. Weaver asked if scheduling was a problem. Mr. Harvett stated he did not think so. They are looking at a system that is in a different area. This is a geographic problem. Mr. Kaspszak stated he thought all agreed with the need for the students to be exposed to the equipment. The idea is fine, but the point is there is a limited of 10H CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JQLY 28, 1993 PAGE 10 funds that can be allocated. Fourteen thousand dollars is a lot of money. Secondly, is this the best way to use the funds? This just came up. The letter came and this is the first that anyone had heard about the request. He is not sure we can make a decision tonight because we do not have all the answers. It gets back to why the existing is not working. Classes have been taught by the Workshop for the school. In 1992, the Workshop instructor was designated as lay teacher of the year by the school. This shows that the relationship is working. That is why we are analyzing the current system. If the current system is working or needs to be modified to address those needs, then that would be the preferred way. Mr. Harvett stated the relationship between the school and the Workshop has been good. Mr. Kaspszak asked Mr. Hammerstrom, if money comes out of the equipment fund, is there a problem with Nortel maintaining that equipment. Mr. Hammerstrom stated he would have to look at the franchise to see how it is worded. From a practical sense, he would have difficulty supporting equipment that is not on site, that Nortel does not have an owning interest, and operated by people they have no control over or without rules governing use. Operationally, this would be a problem. Mr. Kaspszak stated the City has a cable fund. As of January 1, 1993, is there any money in this fund not generated this year? Mr. Moravetz stated there have been transfers from the cable fund in the past few years. Mr. Kaspszak asked if there was a projected budget surplus for this year. Mr. Moravetz stated there was a projected surplus but he did not know the anticipated amount offhand. Mr. Kaspszak asked if, after January 1, there was no money in this account and that any excess monies were transferred to the General Fund. If there any account that this money can be drawn from for cable-related matters? 101 CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28. 1993 PAGE.11 Mr. Moravetz stated there is a possibility to take the money or a portion of that money out of the 5� franchise fee as opposed to the equipment money. Mr. Kaspszak asked if there money leftover in some other account. Mr. Moravetz stated other funds were used up in the remodeling of City Hall with the cable equipment. Mr. Kaspszak stated there is a desire to satisfy the needs of the school but make funds available for the community's use. Perhaps there is way to achieve both. Mr. Stouffer asked that at this time, what is the direction the Commission wishes to take. The Commission can table or make a recommendation. Mr. Scott stated the City Council referred this issue to the Commission. The superintendent addressed the City Manager. Do they have the luxury of tabling and not making a recommendation? Will the City Council consider the request without a recommendation? Mr. Stouffer stated he thought the City Council is looking for a. recommendation. There are unanswered questions, and it would have been nice to have had Dr. Rens present. He would not have a problem with tabling this issue for that reason. Mr. Scott stated he would submit that the Commission does not know what the recommendation will be at this time. Mr. Stouffer stated that in getting this request from the Council and since the Commission will not meet for another three months, a special meeting could be set. He feels their intent is that the Commission should take some action. Mr. Weaver stated he is not convinced that the City Council would like the Commission to take action just for the sake of taking action. There are some questions that still need to be addressed regarding the school budget. He would like to see some answers to these questions before taking a position. Mr. Scott stated he is bothered by this request and the case made for it. He did not hear about community access but rather heard about classes. If these classes exist, he was sure they were valuable for student experience. But classes require all kinds of materials. Schools 10J CATV ADVI80RY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 12 provide the materials for these classes. It appears that the equipment being talked about is primarily for the use of students in classes. Chalk is much cheaper than equipment, but chalk is necessary for the classroom, and the school through its budget and its management should provide chalk, which they should buy, as they should buy camcorders which are used for taping classes or projects for students. If students require editing equipment for its classes, the school should also provide that equipment. The newspaper can provide information on lunch menus and schedules for the school. He sees no reason for waiting to make a recommendation. Mr. Weaver stated he did not disagree, but possibly there is some money the schools are providing, and he would like to know that. Mr. Stouffer stated that as an educator by profession, he understands the reasoning for the media. This Commission and Nortel services Fridley. Fridley is made up of four school districts. If we give part of the money to Fridley, it will set a precedent to provide funds for the other districts as well. They are all agencies which can generate their own funds. He understands the money is available for local access, but if he provides funds for local access he wants it to be the maximum for the most people rather than for special interest. Irregardless of the sound rationale for needing equipment for classes, the other agencies will also be requesting funds for their own niches. He believes that the money is for the general good of the community. This is only for the Fridley school system. Mr. Harvett stated he hoped he had not misled the Commission. This equipment is going toward educational access, not within the school. They are not going to take this equipment and restrict use to only school members, students, etc. They are not trying to duplicate a public access. To open our doors to the community to use equipment is what public access is for. They are trying to build on what we have right now which is educational access. By adding this character generator they would be building on that. Mr. Kaspszak stated there has not been an extensive attempt by the school to try to put programming on the channel. When the concerts seem to be done, the Workshop does it as a community service. He is not sure that students are getting involved. i0K CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28. 1993 PAG$ 13 Mr. Harvett stated there are students getting involved with these activities. Mr. Kaspszak stated the interest is there and it shows that the existing equipment is working. In the beginning of public access, they had a reel-to-reel VCR and they put on a program. It is nice to have the graphics, etc. , but it does not take much to shoot a concert, put it on the air and have everyone like it. That is the kind of stuff that is already happening at the school. Mr. Harvett stated students want to better themselves on what they have right now. Mr. Moravetz stated the Commission could recommend denial of funds, recommend a percentage, or could recommend matching funds. These funds would not necessarily have to come out of the equipment grant. It could be taken out of the 5% franchise fee monies. In this way, it would not handicap the public access. As you know, the money they get from the City franchise fee merely defrays the public access operational expenses. Whereas the school district has their own budget, ETC does not have that lum�ry. They have only this equipment grant money for purchasing equipment. These are the basic choices. Mr. Moravetz stated the request of $14,740 reflects less than .lo of 1% of the school budget. What is the district channel budget for 1993, 1994 and beyond? Mr. Harvett does not have that information. What are the good faith plans of the school? We are looking at duplication of equipment here on already limited funds for equipment. The school district is now a member of the ETC and is using public equipment as it is available. The INET has been discussed. The Commission put in a lot of time, when refranchising, to reach the goal of mandating the cable operator provide the INET, which they did at the time of the rebuild; and the INET is still sitting there and not being used. The track record of the school district for channel usage, other than the character generator, has been pretty much non-existent. The chairman already indicated the unfavorable precedent for other school districts and the library in the City. Mr. Harvett stated he thought this money is set aside for access stations in Fridley. Mr. Moravetz stated ETC's only source of money for equipment comes from the equipment grant of the franchise. The 5a franchise fee monies they receive basical�y covers their operating expenses only. 10L CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 14 III. IV. Maintenance of equipment housed outside of Nortel's studios was commented on by Mr. Hammerstrom from a practical standpoint. School events and activities are currently being cable casted by LO or public access, staff and volunteers. These points made are not intended to be supportive or adversarial, they are just facts. MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Weaver, to recommend this request not be favored; that the Commission has heard a long Iist of reasons why and he would stress the major portion of the proposed expenditure would be for equipment for use in the classroom; further that there are several school districts in the City and that this does set a precedent which is probably not wise; that the other school districts could ask the City Council for support for their needs; that there is little money for access equipment available; and because of the location Nortel would not be able to maintain the equipment. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, C$AIRPER30N STOIIFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. (E.T.C.) Fridley Communications Workshop: a. 2nd Quarter Report to. City Including Statistics and Financial Report MOTION by Mr. Weaver, seconded by Mr. Scott, to receive the 2nd Quarter Report to the City including statistics and financial report. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOIIFFER DECLARED TIiE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOUSLY. b. June Director's Report MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Kaspszak, to receive the June Director's Report. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STODFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY. CATV LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (FCC REPORT AND ORDER): a. Rate Regulation Mr. Moravetz stated the FCC initially required June 21 to be the deadline to apply for certification for rate regulation. It was then set at October 1, and this has now been changed to September 1. He will be attending a conference held at Moss & Barnett Law Firm to go over 10M CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 15 the new FCC rules and regulations and customer service standards. This seminar is scheduled for August 18. Mr. Hammerstrom stated this is the biggest issue that has hit us as an industry since deregulation. The original act went into effect late last year when Congress overrode the President's veto. They had originally intended this portion of the law to go into effect in mid-June. The FCC was given no funding, they had no staff, no work space, and they put it off until October 1. They did now get the funding and are pushing up the implementation date to September 1. This means our rates have to determined before September l and whatever winds up having the final impact on these rates must be determined and in place by September l. He will give the Commission an idea of what he e�cpects the impact to be, and provide an objective overview of what the City is looking at in terms of regulation, what can and cannot be regulated, the process that must be taken, and what needs to be done for certification. Mr. Hammerstrom stated it is up to the Commission or the City Council to request regulation. He has tried a number of different scenarios to see what the best thing would be for Nortel. As it is now, there is not a big difference to Nortel whether the City elects to file to regulate rates or not. Their relationship has been good enough that he would prefer to deal at a local level with the rate issue rather than with the FCC in Washington. The rules are still open for interpretation. The law creates three groups who can set rates - the City, the FCC, or the cable company. Mr. Hammerstrom stated the City has been given the authority, if they decide that they want to file for the authority, to regulate the basic level af service or the $7.95 rate presently charged. In addition to that, the equipment plus installation fees associated with basic are also regulated by the City. If the City decides not to file for authority, the FCC will regulate the whole works. If the City does file, the FCC will regulate only that portion above the basic which they refer to as the cable services portion or, in our case, the satellite tier. The cable operator continues to be able to regulate their rates for pay-for-view, premium seryices and "a la carte" services. The FCC created a series of "baskets". The rules are over 500 pages. He received them the first part of May and is still working on them. He can provide an general idea of what the rates are going to be but there may be some last minute 10N � CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MLETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 16 modifications. There are still some things pending with the FCC. Mr. Hammerstrom stated in the baskets are grouped basic service, equipment, and then cable services. The goal is to try to reach a benchmark rate which is determined on the basis of a cents per channel per month per subscriber basis for a given level of service above which we cannot go, below which we are okay but cannot increase rates until the rate freeze expires in November. Essentially what they have to do is take all of our revenue, throw it into basic, extract our equipment costs, extract our satellite costs, and then determine individually whether or not our rate matches those estabTished benchmarks. In effect, the City cannot say that a$2.95 remote control fee is too high. The FCC has established a method of coming up with a calculation for the cable operator to come up with the actual cost of that device given a reasonable profit over time. They are trying to achieve a total rev�nue per subscriber picture. Mr. Hammerstrom stated that before September 1, cable companies can adjust rates or tiers, add programming or take off programming, provided that program does not reach beyond the benchmark rate. This essentially places the burden of revenue for the cable operator under different items. For example, they do not expect basic service to change. The satellite tier will probably not change either. In fact, the benefit is that there will probably be the addition of three satellite channels. There will probably be a reduction of the add outlet fees from $4.95 to 75-80 cents per month. The remote fees will go down from $2.95 to about 20-30 cents per month. There will be a monthly converter rental fee of about $2.00 per month. Someone who now has basic and satellite with an additional outlet or remote control will see some savings. Someone with basic only and no converter will probably see no change. Someone with basic and a remote will see a $3.00 increase. Mr. Hammerstrom stated the reason the FCC is doing this is to place the burden for applying on the actual piece of equipment which winds up bearing the cost. We are in full compliance with the law. The statement that customers would see 10% lower rates was not accurate. Most people will actually see an increase in rates as a result of the FCC's benchmark rates. Mr. Moravetz asked if there are benchmarks established for the add-on outlets and converter or remote boxes 100 CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 17 also. How did Mr. Hammerstrom come to those anticipated reductions? Mr. Hammerstrom stated there were rather detailed worksheets included in the 500+ pages of regulations which are very similar to income tax forms. With the equipment, that is essentially taken out of the gross revenues how much the equipment rental charges are a portion of that and allocating that revenue to rental of the piece of equipment. Mr. Moravetz asked if there is an industry standard or norm.for each piece of equipment? Mr. Hammerstrom stated these are being separated out. Mr. Weaver stated the more features the customer wants the more they will pay. Mr. Hammerstrom stated, ironically, the people that have the most invested in technology and have the most converters in the field today are the operators that will see the largest rollback. They are actually being penalized for having equipment in the field. Some of the systems operated will not be touched at all because they have 1'ittle equipment. In their case, that is where the revenue came from. Through the benchmark calculation process, back to the box and the actual handheld remote control fees are dropped. Mr. Weaver stated basic would then remain the same with the three additional channels. Mr. Hammerstrom stated that if for no other reason than a word for the wise, when looking at rates at the local level, Mr. Moravetz will see all the steps that must be gone through to arrive at these rates. The question becomes what is the benefit to the City. Mr. Weaver stated the problem is what choice do we have. Mr. Hammerstrom stated this is the difficult point. From a political standpoint, there is no choice. It is coming up to election time. From a standpoint of not submitting for authorization to regulate, it will look like the City does not care. As a forewarning, take a close look at the amount of paperwork and the burden this is going to place on City staff. 10P � CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 18 Mr. Kaspszak asked how many basic subscribers there are. It seems that all this work will benefit a handful of people. Mr. Hammerstrom stated that portion of basic is also a portion of satellite. If they raise the basic service rate, it would affect the every subscriber. Mr. Hammerstrom reviewed the timetable. September 1 is the first day that the City can apply to the FCC for certification. Thirty days later, if the City has not heard from the FCC, you are certified. Once that has happened, Nortel must be notified and a copy of the rates requested. This puts into place a definite timetable which must be withheld. Mr. Hammerstrom stated the FCC wants the acceptance of the rates with a specific timeframe. Thirty days after Nortel provides the notification of rates, the rates must be certified or the City can ask for a 120-day extension in order to ask for information. If they feel the benchmarks are too low, that there are mitigating costs within the community that justifies a higher rate, access fees for example,. and we feel they can justify a higher basic level rates by showing a cost of service justification for the rate, Nortel can file a petition with the City saying we can demonstrate on a cost-of- service basis that are rates should be a specified amount. The City than has 150 days to say the cost-of- service showing is accurate. It is not just a routine stamp. Thi.s is quite detailed. Mr. Moravetz stated the simple things the City must do in order to regulate rates is i) apply for certification through the FCC and send a copy of the request to the cable operator; 2) amend the cable ordinance or adopt a separate ordinance consistent with the FCC regulations, and within 120 days of certification, the City shall follow the rules relating to the rate regulation mandated by the FCC; and 3) notify the cable operator that steps 1 and 2 have been completed and the City will regulate the rates....Then it becomes more time consuming. Mr. Moravetz stated he had talked to Bloomington. They are in a different situation with a greater number of subscribers and greater cable revenues. They are going to apply for certification just for the sake of keeping the doors open for the future, as we discussed earlier. Mr. Hammerstrom stated, once the City applies for certification, it sets a process in motion and the City 10Q CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGS 19 must go through the process of certifying rates. This is what Nortel's legal advisor is saying. Mr. Weaver asked Mr. Moravetz when he would be attending the seminar. Mr. Moravetz stated the seminar is on August 18 in Minneapolis. The City can apply for certification three years from now, but September 1 is the earliest one can apply. There are still questions that must be answered. Mr. Weaver stated, with the number of applications, there is no way the FCC can go through all the applications in that time. Mr. Hammerstrom stated that is the reason for the default. Mr. Hammerstrom stated, with the City if the benchmarks are approved, any subscriber can complain in writing to the FCC about the rates charged. The FCC will then investigate. The FCC is trying to be as flexible as they can. There may be some accommodation made. Nortel is going to be in compliance with the benchmarks and will provide a letter to Mr. Moravetz as to the changes in rates. Subscriber notices must go out with the bilZs at the end of August in order to comply with the short deadline. Things are moving very quickly. b. Customer Service Standards Mr. Hammerstrom distributed copies of Service Standards portion of the law. mandated that we reach certain standards. elect to enforce them, and the City needs days notification of their intent to standards. At this point, Nortel would compliance with the standards. the Customer The FCC has The City can to provide 90 enforce the have to be in Mr. Hammerstrom stated the law provides that local broadcast stations now have a choice of whether or not to be carried on a cable system. They can elect what is called "must carry", in which case the cable system must carry them by law on the channel they designate. There are not fees and no restraints. The cable operator has to have them on. Or, they can elect to "retransmission consent" whereby they have to come to the cable operator and say what they want and, in exchange, we carry their product. If the operator does not agree to do this, then the station will not let the cable operator carry that channel in the system. Our policy is that Nortel is not 10R CATV ADVISORY COMMI$SION MEETING JIILY 28 1993 PAGE 20 going to pay cash compensation for carrying local broadcast stations. That is not an uncommon stance throughout the industry, but rather prevalent practice. At the moment, Channels 2, 9, 17 and 23 have elected "must carry". Channels 4, 5, 11 and 29 have elected "retransmission consent". It appears right now that Nortel will have an agreement shortly with Channel 5. They have made a deal where there is no compensations. provided. Channel 11 has been willing to work with Nortel in finding non-cash alternatives to carry. They have been willing to work and negotiate. Channel 4 has been letting the CBS corporate negotiate with the Nortel corporate office and are quite adamant about receiving cash. He will provide updates. V. OTHER BUSINESS: a. Recognition of Service Mr. Moravetz stated Mr. Duane Peterson resigned from the Commission effective in June 1993. The City Council will recognize his service with a letter and certificate. He will notify members of the date of City Council meeting so they can attend. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION by Mr. Weaver, seconded by Mr. Scott, to adjourn the meeting. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOUFFER DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JULY 28, 1993, CATV ADVIS012Y COMMISSION MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:52 P.M. Respectfully submitted, i .� , La�onn Cooper (�� Recording Secretary 10S (a) A cable franchise authority may enforce the customer service standards set forth in section (c) of this rule against cable operators. The franchise authority must provide affected cable operators ninety (90) days written notice of its intent to enfo�ce the standards. (b) Nothing in this rule should be construed to prevent or prohibit: (1) A franchising authority and a cable operato� from agreeing to customer service requi�ements that exceed the standards set fo�th in section (c) of this rule; (2) A franchising authority from enforcing, through the end of the franchise term, pre-existing customer service requirements that exceed the standards set forth in section (c) of this rule and are contained in current franchise agreements; (3) Any State or any franchising authority from enacting or enfo�cing any consume� protection law, to the extent not specifica!!y preempted herein; or (4) The establishment or enforcement of any State or municipal law or �egulation concerning customer service that imposes custome� service requirements that exceed, or add�ess matters not addressed by, the standards set forth in section (c) of this rule. {c) Effective July 1, 1993, a cable operator shall be subject to the following customer service standards: (1) Cable svstem office hours and telephone availability. (i} The cable operator will maintain a local, toll-free or collect call telephone access line which will be available to its subscribers 24 hours a day, seven days a week_ (A) Trained company represe�tatives will be available to respond to custamer telephone inquiries during normal business hours. {B) After normal business hours, the access line may be answered by a service or an automated response system, including an answering machine. Inqui�ies received after normal business hours must be responded to by a trained company representative on the next business day. (ii) Under normal operating conditions, telephone answer time by a customer representative, including wait time, shall not exceed thirty (30) seconds when the connection is made. !f the call needs to be transferred, transfe� time shall �ot exceed thirty (30) seconds. These standards shall be met no less than ninety (90) percent of the time unde� normal operating conditions, measured on a quarterly basis. (iii) The operator will not be required to acquire equipment or perform surveys to measure compliance with the telephone answering standards above unless an historical record of complaints indicates a clear failure to comply. (iv} Under normat operating conditions, the customer will receive a busy signal less than three (3) percent of the time. (v) Customer service center and bill payment locations will be open at (east during normal business hours and will be conveniently located. (2) lnstallations, outages and service calls. Under normal operating conditions, each of the following four standards will be met no less than ninety five (95) percent of the time measured on a quarterly basis: (i) Standard installations will be performed within seven (7) business days after an order has been placed. "Standard" installations are those that are located up to 125 feet from the existing distribution system. 10T � _ (ii} Excluding conditions beyond the control of the operator, the cable operator will begin working on "seroice interruptions" promptly and in no event later than 24 hours after the. interruption becomes known. The cable operator must begin actions to correct other service problems the next business day after notification of the service problem. . (iii} The "appointment window" alternatives for installations, service calfs, and other installafion activities will be either a specific time or, at maximum, a four-hour time block during no�mal business hours. (fhe operator may schedule service calls and other installation activities outside of normal business hours for the express convenience of the customer.} {iv) An operator may not cancel an appointment with a customer after the close of business on the business day prior to the scheduled appointment. (v) If a cable operator representative is running late for an appointment with a customer and will not be able to keep the appointment as scheduled, the custome� will be contacted. The appointment will be rescheduled, as necessary, at a time which is convenient for the customer. (3) Communications between cable operators and cable subscribers. (i) Notificatrons to subscribers. (A) The cable operator shall provide written information on each of the following areas at the time of installation of service, at least annually to all subscribers, and at any time upon request: (1) Products and services offered; (2} Prices and options fo� programming services and conditions of subscription to programming and other services; (3) Instaltation and service maintenance po(icies; (4) Instructions on how to use the cable service; (5) Channel positions of programming ca�ried on the system; and, (6) Billing and complaint procedures, including the address and telephone number of the Iocal franchise authorit�ls cable office. (B} Customers will be notified of any changes in rates, programming services or channel positions as soon as possible through announcements on the cable system and in writing. Notice must be given to subscribers a minimum of thirty (30) days in advance of such changes if the change is within the control of the cable operator. ln addition, the cable operator shall notify subscribers thirty (30) days in advance of any significant changes in the other intormation required by the preceding paragraph. (ii} Billing. (A) Bills will be clear, concise and understandable. Bills must be fully itemized, with itemizations including, but not limited to, basic and premium service charges and equipment charges. Bills will also clearly delineate all activity during the billing period, including optional charges, rebates and credits. (B) In case of a billing dispute, the cable operator must respond to a written complaint from a subscriber within thirty {30) days. (iii) Refunds. Refund cl�ecks will be issued promptly, but no later than either- (A) The customer s next billing cycle following resolution of the request or thirty (30) days, whichever is earlier, or (B} The return of the equipment supplied by the cable operator if service is terminated. 10U (iv) Credits. Credits for service will be issued no later than the customer's next billing cycle following the determination that a credit is warranted. {4) Definitions. (i) Narmal Business Hours. The term "normal business hours" means those hours during which most similar businesses in the community are open to serve customers. In a(I cases, "normal business hours" must include some evening hours at least one night pe� week and/or some weekend hours. (iij Normal Operating Conditions. The term "normal operating conditions" means those service conditions which are within the control of the cable operator. Those conditions which are nor within the contro� of the cable operator include, but are not limited to, natural disasters, civi! disturbances, power outages, teJe�hone network outages, and severe or unusua! weather conditions. Those conditions which are ordinarily within the controt of the cable operator include, but are not limited to, special promotions, pay-per-view events rate increases, regular peak or seasonal demand periods, and maintenance or upg�ade of the cahle system. {iii} Service lnierruption. The term "service inter�uption" means the loss of picture o� sound on one or more cable channels. g76.309 Reference l�V CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING, AIIGIIST il, 1993 _________________________________________________________________ CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Newman called the August 11, 1993, Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Dave Newman, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba, Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig Members Absent: Diane Savage, LeRoy Oquist Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Oliver Tam, 1150 Fireside Drive N.E. Joyce Moen, 1128 - 63rd Avenue N.E. Joyce Trebisovsky, 1130 Fireside Drive N.E. APPROVAL OF JULY 28. 1993, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the July 28, 1993, Planning Commission minutes as written. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT. P.S. #93-03, BY OLIVER TAM� TAM ADDITION: To replat property described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 11 1993 PAGE 2 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CFIAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is processing three land use requests. One is a plat request to subdivide the subject parcel which is addressed as 1160 Fireside Drive, located between the two mobile home parks east of Highway 65 into three lots. The second request is to rezone a portion of the subject parcel from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District. The third request is a variance request to address the existing encroachments by the restaurant faciZity currently located on the property. On August 17, 1993, the Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance request to the City Council. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is proposing to replat the existing parcel into three separate parcels. Two parcels are proposed to be used for two new four-unit residential dwellings, and the third parcei is for the existing restaurant facility. There are currently two dwelling units on the lots proposed for the two new four-unit dwellings. Ms. McPherson stated the lots for the multiple family dwellings meet the minimum lot area and lot width requirements as required by the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District. Each lat meets the minimum 15,000 square foot area requirement and also meets the minimum lot width of 85 feet. Each parcel has a minimum of 25 feet of access from a public street. The second lot achieves its access via a"flag lot". While typically a flag lot is not an ideal subdivision pattern, there is adequate room on the remainder of the parcel for a cul-de-sac should the parcel change use at a later date, and additional right-of-way could be dedicated to the east of the easterly lot line and a public street could be constructed for a future subdivision. Ms. McPherson stated the remaining portion of the subject parcel is for the existing restaurant facility. The lot area exceeds the minimum of 35,000 square feet as required for the C-3, General Shopping Center District. There is not a minimum lot width requirement in the C-3 district, however, there is adequate room on site for the parcel to meet the minimum setback and parking requirements, with the exception of the two existing encroachments on the southwest corner of the property for the restaurant facility. Ms. McPherson stated a portion of the restaurant's parking lot and access does encroach onto the multiple family lot as proposed. Cross parking and access easements will need to be recorded against both the proposed restaurant property as well as the proposed multiple dwelling property. 11A PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AIIGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 3 Ms. McPherson stated that as part o� the overall plat request, the petitioner is proposing to improve the parking lot and provide the required B618 concrete curb and gutter as required by City Code. A landscaping plan should be submitted by the petitioner to provide adequate screening and buffering between the restaurant facility and the proposed multi-unit buildings. A detention facility will also be required as part of the parking lot upgrade. The Engineering Department will require the petitioner to sign and record against the property a storm water pond maintenance agreement. The Engineering Department has reviewed the preliminary grading plan and has submitted a list of comments via the surveyor to the petitioner. Ms. McPherson stated that as the plat request meets the minimum requirements of each of the zoning districts, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to the City Council with the following stipulations: l. The petitioner shall submit the information requested in Scott Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993, regarding the stormwater pond and the grading and drainage plan. 2. The petitioner shall record against proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block l, Tam Addition, cross parking and access easements. 3. 4. The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a stormwater pond maintenance agreement. 5. The park dedication shall be $1,500 per lot for the residential portion and $.023 per square foot for the remaining portion for the restaurant facility. (shall be paid at the time of the issuing of the building permit - for residential) Mr. Newman stated that access to the flag lot would really be through the parking lot and that the residential property would have to negotiate parking spaces with the restaurant property. Has the City ever done anything like this before? Ms. McPherson stated that typically most of the cross parking easements have occurred between two commercial properties or two industrial properties. In reviewing this request, the City Assessor suggested that perhaps the flag could be rotated so that the flag portion is on the westerly side, and the access would then occur over the driveway for the other multiple family dwelling. Then, the back yard of the second multiple family dwelling would be facing the restaurant facility. However, that eliminates the potential for any future subdivision and public roadway. 11B PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AUGDST 11, 1993 PAGE 4 Mr. Kondrick stated that when the restaurant is having a successful evening, the possibility exists that there will be times when there are no parking spaces for the multiple family dwellings. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is proposing a four stall garage. If that is a concern, the owner can post a sign reserving the first four stalls for additional parking. That has been done for commercial developments. Mr. Newman stated that if, in fact, the multiple family property is under separate ownership from the restaurant property, then how is the City going to get the additional 25 feet to put in the public roadway. Ms. Dacy stated that in answer to that concern, as part of the plat request, they should reserve a 25 foot street easement along the entire length of the flag to reserve that option. Maybe the following two stipulations should be added in the event the restaurant property should ever return to residential: � 7. If the restaurant property returns to use, the parking lot encroachment is two properties. The dedication of the street easement a residential removed from these Mr. Oliver Tam stated he is the owner of the Rice Bowl Restaurant. He stated he is very appreciative of staff's ideas and suggestions to make the lot work for everyone involved. Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner agreed with the stipulations recommended by staff. Mr. Tam stated he had no problems with the stipulations. Mr. Newman asked if the petitioner understood that the City may require a 25 foot street easement. Mr. Tam stated he had no objection to that, whatever works best for the property. Ms. Joyce Trebisovsky, 1130 Fireside Drive N.E., stated she represents Park Plaza Mobile Home Park and Estate Mobile Home Park. Her only concern is that if the parking lot is expanded to the right side of the property, there should be some type of barrier so the lights do not shine into the mobile home park. Mr. Newman stated that, at this time, there is no proposal to move the parking lot. If in the future, the owner decides to replat the restaurant property and break it into residential 1ots, then at that time a public street would go in. However, in all likelihood the parking lot would also go away. If any of 11C PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AOGIIST 11, 1993 _ PAGB 5 this happens, there would be another public hearing, notices would be sent out, and this process would repeat itself. Ms. Trebisovsky thanked Mr. Newman for this clarification. Mr. Saba stated he did not think it is a good situation to have a cross parking easement between commercial and residential. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed multi-family units are not intended to be the typical general occupancy units. They are for Mr. Tam's family and employees of the Rice Bowl, and he will be the owner of both the properties. Ms. Modig stated that is fine for the present tim�; but if, in the future, Mr. Ta� sells the property, then there is a parking lot situation with a cross parking easement and two pieces of property under separate ownership. Ms. Dacy stated there have been instances on commercial properties where signs reserving parking spaces are successful. The Code requires eight parking spaces for each multi-family dwelling unit, and they already have four garage spaces. That leaves only four spaces that are needed, and she believed those spaces can be reserved. She did not see a big conflict with the cross parking easement. Ms. Modig stated the only times she could see the parking being a problem is during private parties or large events at the restaurant. Ms. Dacy stated that if the Commission feels strongly about this, then one solution would be to flipflop the flag to the west side of the property. Mr. Saba stated he could not see a problem with a cross parking easement with commercial/commercial properties, but he did see potential problems with commercial/residential. Ms. Modig stated she did not see a problem now with the proposed usage of the multiple family units by Mr. Tam's family members. Her concern is for the future. If the property is sold and the new owners do not want the cross parking easement, does the City have to get involved? Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending that the cross parking easement be executed as part of the plat approval. If there are any changes, then both owners would have to agree to that. Ms. Dacy stated that in looking at the plat, there might be enough area on site to create a little pad for four parking spaces on each lot separate from the commercial property. Staff could work with the petitioner on this. 11D PLANNING COMMI38ION MEETING. AOGOST 11, 1993 PAGE 6 MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPBRSON NBWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M. Mr. Newman stated staff has done the best they can with some undesirable choices. He did not particularly like the cross parking easement, but he did think that keeping the flag on the east side of the property preserves some options for the future. There might be some problems with the cross parking easement in the future, but those are the types of issues that are better left resolved by the property owners. In the cases of redevelopment, there are going to be some problems in working around existing structures. He stated he is comfortable with approving the plat with the stipulations as recommended by staff, with the addition of a stipulation to vacate the street easement and to terminate the cross parking easement upon change in use of restaurant or discontinuation of use of the lot. Mr. Saba stated he is not comfortable with the cross parking easement. It is a good situation now, but what about the future? What if the restaurant changes to a night club, and there are even more cars in the parking lot? He would like to see something else worked out with the parking. Ms. Modig stated that she did not have a problem with the flag lot. She would like to figure out something to do with the cross parking easement if it becomes a problem in the future without having to go through this whole process again. Ms. Dacy asked if the Commission members would like staff to explore the possibility of finding a separate area for eight spaces other than on the commercial lot. Ms. Modig stated she is just concerned about the cross parking becoming an issue in the future, and it may never be an issue. Mr. Sielaff stated that if it is possible, he would like to see the parking kept on the residential lots to prevent any future parking problems. Mr. Kondrick stated he would also be in favor of the present configuration with access into the lots with eight parking spaces on the residential lots. Mr. Newman stated he had no problem with that, except that would mean blacktopping more area of the overall site to put in eight more stalls. Ms. Modig stated she would be comfortable with trying to put eight parking spaces on the residential lots. 11E PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 11, 1993 PAGE 7 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend approval of preliminary plat, P.S. #93-03, by Oliver Tam, Tam Addition, to replat property described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit the information requested in Scott Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993, r�garding the stormwater pond and the grading and drainage plan. 2. The petitioner shall record against proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Tam Addition, cross parking and access easements. 3. 4. The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a stormwater pond maintenance agreement. 5. The park dedication shall be $1,500 per lot for the residential portion and $.023 per square foot for the remaining portion for the restaurant facility. Payment of the park dedication fee for the residential properties shall be paid at the time of the issuance of the building permit. � 7. Mr. Newman motion, he parking. situation. A 25 foot street easement shall be dedicated on the easterly portion of the flag lot for a future road. Staff shall work with the petitioner to provide eight parking spaces within both residential lots. stated that although he would vote in favor of the did not think they need to require this additional However, it is a good approach to a difficult 11F PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AIIGUST 11, 1993 PAGE 8 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DBCLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING, ZOA #93-01, BY OLIVER TAM: To rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling on property described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE DOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:15 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated that currently, the two dwelling units are located on the same parcel as the restaurant. These dwelling units are currently nonconforming as residential uses are not permitted in the C-3, General Shopping Center District. In order to allow the petitioner to even upgrade the existing dwellings or construct new ones as he is proposing, the property needs to be rezoned from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling. Ms. McPherson stated the rezoning request only pertains to the proposed lots for the multiple family dwelling units. The remaining parcel will remain C-3, General Shopping Center District. Ms. McPherson stated three criteria need to be evaluated in analyzing any rezoning request: 1. 2. District compatibility with adjacent uses and zoning District intent 11G PLANNINa COMMISSION MEETING. AIIGIIST 11, 1993 PAG$ 9 3. Whether or not the parcel meets the district requirements Ms. McPherson stated that as discussed earZier during the plat request, the proposed Zots under the subdivision ordinance meet the minimum requirements of the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District. Also, the proposed use of the two lots for multiple family dwelling units is also consistent with the purpose of the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District, which is to provide zoning for multiple family, two family, and single family dwellings. Ms. McPherson stated the adjacent properties are zoned R-4, Mobile Home Park, so rezoning the two properties to R-3 would not have an adverse impact on the R-4 residential zoning. Ms. McPherson stated that as the request meets the criteria for evaluation of a rezoning request, staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the rezoning request with one stipulation: 1. Preliminary plat request, P.S. #93-03, shall be approved. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend to City Council approval of rezoning, ZOA #93-01, by Oliver Tam, to rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling on property described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., with the following stipulation: 11H PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 10 1. Preliminary plat request, P.S. #93-03, shall be approved. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated the City Council will conduct a public hearing for the preliminary plat and rezoning requests on September 27, 1993. 3. SAV #93-03, BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: To vacate all easements as donated and dedicated to the public for drainage and utility purposes and as shown on the recorded plat of Shorewood Plaza, as corrected by Surveyor's Certificate files as Document No. 176792. All in Anoka County, Minnesota. This property is generally located at the intersection of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Highway 65 and Central Avenue. The subject parcels include the East and West Moore Lake Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet Swim and Health Club, and Sears Outlet. Ms. McPherson stated the Planning Commission recently reviewed a plat request by the City of Fridley to replat the Shorewood Plaza plat which was approved by the City in 1987. New easements for utility, drainage, and bikeway/walkway purposes are to be dedicated on the new revised plat. In order to avoid any confusion, staff is suggesting that the existing easements which are not being utilized by the utilities or various bikeway/ walkways be vacated prior to recording the plat with its associated easements. A number of utilities constructed within this development we�e not located within the easements as they were dedicated. The City is ensuring that appropriate easements are being dedicated over those utilities to provide proper access for the City. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of this vacation request. Staff will ensure that the vacation ordinance is recorded prior to the recording of the new plat. MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend to City Council approval of SAV #93-03, by the City of Fridley to vacate all easements as donated and dedicated to the public for drainage and utility purposes and as shown on the recorded plat of Shorewood Plaza, as corrected by Surveyor's Certificate files as Document No. 176792. All in Anoka County, Minnesota. This property is generally located at the intersection of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Highway 65 and Central Avenue. , 1 1� I PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGUST 11, 1993 PAGE il The subject parcels include the East and West Moore Lake Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet Swim and Health Club, and Sears Outlet. IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. 4. RECEIVE JULY 8, 1993, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the July 8, 1993, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. RECEIVE JULY 27, 1993, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the July 27, 1993, Appeals Commission minutes. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting declared the motion carried unanimously Planning Commission meeting adjourned at Respectfully submitted, Ly Saba Recording Secretary 11J Saba, to adjourn the aye, Chairperson Newman and the August 11, 1993, 8:30 p.m. r � � � Community Development Department P G D�sioN City of Fridley DATE: September 9, 1993 /J�, • /�'+_ TO: William Burns, City Manager�, FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Establish Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat Request, P.S. #93-03, by Oliver Tam; 1160 Fireside Drive N.E. The PZanning Commission reviewed the plat request at its August 11, 1993 meeting. Chapter 211 of the Fridley City Code requires the City Council to conduct a public hearing for all plat requests. Staff recommends that the City Council establish September 27, 1993 as the date of the public hearing. MM/ dn M-93-497 REQUEST Aermit Number Applicant Proposed Request Location SITE DATA Size Density Present Zoning Present Land Use(s) Adjacent , Zoning Adjacent Land Use(s) Utilities Park Dedication Watershed District ANALYSIS Financial Implications Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations RECOMMENDATION Staff Appeals Commission Ptanning Commission Author �:ls S TAFF REP O RT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date Planning Commission Date August 11, 1993 City Council Date: September 13, 1993 P.S. #93-03 Oliver Tam Z+o replat prc�xty into three lots 1160 Fir�eide Drive 114,048 sq. ft.; 2.61 acres C-3, General Shopping Center District Retai 1/R�s idential 1�4, Mobile Hoire Park, to E& W; C-3, Gex�eral Shopping Center District, to S& N; M-1, Light Industrial, to the S Residential to the E& W; Vacant to the S; Retail to the N $1,500 per lot (2); $.023 per sq. ft. Rice Creek Appivval with stipulations Approval with stipulations 's� ; �. c .�o. � /a: �« � � P . S . 4�93-03 Oliver Tam N' //2 SEC. /2, T. 30, R. 2� n C/TY OF FR/OL E Y 2 � , �2 1' Na � 11M LOCATION MAP P.S. 4�93-03 nliver Tam 11 N ZONING MAP Staff Report P.S. #93-03, Page 2 Request 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam The petitioner requests that a plat be approved to split a parcel into three lots. The request is for 1160 Fireside Drive N.E. In addition to the plat request, the petitioner is also processing a rezoning request to rezone two of the proposed three lots from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling, to allow the construction of two 4-unit dwellings. The petitioner is also processing a variance request to bring existing encroachments of the restaurant facility into conformance. Site Located on the subject parcel is the Tam's Fireside Rice Bowl Restaurant and two existing dwelling units. The property is zoned C-3, General Shopping Center District, as are the properties to the north and south. The properties to the east and west are zoned R- 4, Mobile Home Park. Analvsis The petitioner is proposing to create three parcels, two proposed to be rezoned to multiple family and one commercial property. Multiple Family Two multiple family lots are proposed. Each lot meets the minimum lot area requirement of 15,000 square feet for the R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling district, for a 4-unit building. The minimum lot width of 85 feet is met. The proposed setbacks for the multi-unit buildings conform to the zoning district requirements. Each parcel has a minimum of 25 feet of street access. The southerly lot is a"flag" lot in order to provide access to Fireside Drive. While direct access to a public street is preferable, there is adequate room for an additional 25 feet to the east to be dedicated and a cul-de-sac constructed for future residential subdivision to occur. Commercial The remaining portion of the property will be used for the restaurant facility. The lot area exceeds the minimum 35,000 square feet required by the C-3, General Shopping Center District. There is no minimum lot width required by the C-3 district; however, there is adequate room for the restaurant facility. The access will be provided from Fireside Drive. A portion of the access does encroach onto the new lot for the proposed multi-unit building. Cross parking and access easements will need to be recorded against the restaurant and the multi-famiZy parcel. 110 Staff Report P.S. #93-03, I160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam Page 3 The restaurant meets the minimum setback requirements with the exception of the rear yard setback and the setback from an adjacent residential district. The Appeals Commission reviewed the variance request to reduce the rear yard setback from 40 feet to 26.8 feet and to reduce the setback from an adjacent residential district from 50 feet to 20.4 feet. The Commission recommended that the City Council approve the variances to correct the existing encroachments. As part of the plat request, the petitioner proposes to improve the parking lot and provide required B618 concrete curb and gutter. A landscaping plan should also be submitted by the petitioner to provide adequate screening and buffering between the restaurant facility and the proposed multi-unit buildings. With the parking lot improvement, a detention facility will be required, and the petitioner will be required to sign a stormwater pond maintenance agreement for maintenance of the detention pond. The engineering department has received the preliminary grading and drainage plan and has provided comments. Recommendation As the proposed plat request meets the minimum requirements of each zoning district, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit the information requested in Scott Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993, regarding the stormwater pond and the grading and drainage plan. 2. The petitioner shall record against Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Tam Addition, cross parking and access easements. 3. The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan. 4. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a stormwater pond maintenance agreement. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. The Commission added the following stipulations: 5. Park dedication fees shall be paid by the petitioner. 6. Each dwelling unit shall have adequate parking separate from the restaurant. 11P Staff Report P.S. #93-03, 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam Page 4 City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission action. As the petitioner has not made a final decision regarding the final design of the dwelling units, staff recommends that stipulation #6 be amended to read: 6. The petitioner shall submit final dwelling plans indicating compliance with the parking requirements of the R-3, Genera� Multiple Family Dwelling district. 71Q � � � FIMaR{ J TOP MU o H,•. .93-03 p E�EV.'t�4��r_� '- �v J����iF ::- /�� ^ 600 feel Eae� oflhe tVest Ji�e 3�-r�-�°'�� J� FireN4dran! � Of Ihe $.E.%¢ orlhe NtV. % OF SeC.l2 fa�� Save� = a O_-,�� ; ___ w J/D� � � As'anhc/e W �' ! � or .,y r�cvE ��/ /c�,.. / , N q J� S 88 4.0'42"E. w �+- / -- ' -- 288.00--- aesea / --- '------ — '-- __ees,ao c�"° �r?oad ��menr erpoc. No. 285700 �, j,-- '—� Fc;aeco --.--. i o ,�sr � o ,A $Tp NI N TC;6945 T'CS95 CVas ' V E 1(1 i � RM � j yE. > M i n n w D O li s a S• Cwnpsn ---- � c u a e °� O.S � a e nf Pe� N �_ !95 aOTC � 'y �Rer s. eo' x•e ourcer� � • � --- ---+o�.n-- � — - r o ENT�OIy ,4R� 1niV.:e� 5 � s.as'40'4 '�.o.� ` u�tRns�.a � CATCH BASIN ! � 9 896 ��,n I�sicr+ I { x p TC =B96.0 � e�c,� egq T FL �895.5 � „ 8�6"3 � J LF-f�'RCPC �$ GRATE-895.3 ` , �o � / F. 2 � 4� a TORMSEN/FJ? 0.5 • INV.=89J.5 '� �,a. . eec t V ry; "� � y� / z c43Z � o, � 6»2 til W ��W a `n �= -'« °� �j L- � ' ;,j � � _ �' 1 � 'S� p� �jti iyWC�.aN°'y c�e ^ r�- ( � - W � , O; ro O11y � �`J! ,"o�ap h a x � ? { � . O - � � i�` � 0 N M .'n 1 � I 4 . U 4 `���� �� ..y I �n � 401? �_ ;zc�',= � J QJ; c, � I � O�, � / G a 5 e� ' �r6 Z � O� ��oja9c�t 894�0 Q�' � ��9 54 897 Oc �k o; '�. , :. � / � m u V � `7� � v � lV A O b , '1 '\ @x o i� {� � .%E i4.c � � k`�' ' � 1 �� � y � I .. Q a �„ ,m� .: Fti<.�:�:`-' ,,a, Q � , . 4 4 i� •.� • GaYaGE e� O� i ,� � � •�c'l y�' . �'� �� " -°/ � � � � N � ` F I � '/�—.. -- --- ` " ,} Q� Np � n [a Q N m a f I �' S.88 GO'G2�• °" : o CS QH' : 2 � O � I � I i � , ��` esa„a o �Q �O v> � ' - — ---- =�° 6 M � � O in � �. jf o c 1 � ':c.b o. '1� /N I� (�l O W L-` � I' L�Q <�r' I ,�` ia.� � � �� i5 8 1�t74 "� 6!7 34 ^ B�GE , ?o �' d - ! ot � �''- �) W a i�m ��cRyFR/'N= ,y 'J iJv / J y V N p ! II+ G Io J � F J O Q� I � C � ; ,� , ! ,� ,� � . h I �,E,tOI C'v t � J',' � � ' �? � l� V �Y � a,: �;a' R _ / �; (m m�/ 4\� � 1/. 7�� �G! a � I o- . _... .�POy. P / ���� )\/,� � a O m I i p� Z I � � tl 5 !�� �.:/�(`y'� o� `. ��\ , / / 'i� j � �ltJ o0 �0� . I m = n�/ J� � ,' ' W �25 � z a� J � �'X � � . ��;?W� (.� �Cd�¢ : /y o\V � N O � I 1�1 M N � `l I / � p %�e � � �t ` /Q C N ��U 3 I ,W W � 1 ��, _� P � ° o; � �g , . �� I as�,6 , a ta Q,�' �- �N ' � L — -- � � � 697 p.0 N } . w D�� 896a9 � ^ � / � % � 896.`. V IO . �p Z W � . (�Q' . �L J = __ '� °j^ � . p Y W \ — °1— - 69 � \ � �96 W � o � „ , ^ `� �6�, . yq �D }a � CONCRETmE� 8618 ^, �F� I 3� � j� I�� �` ��` � \ w� y�� vi '- ¢' ' I�c, =E.� � �_ SCAI.E 5 ' � cYi I°d � _� N � - 5'. a9 I TOTAL Y¢ � �4 L, t 62 �t. 89� 6 ' Q ys 9 a \/�{-� p, _ � I PROPOSE Q� �\/�/ /) � 5 , N I 7 " 69 / � J 'I - 895 " ��� �9�+" I� �`3B9g�*�c;, � �' S ��'� Wx�' I r��'Y 6d.` ri x I<� la! . g94 I �:`. . i b p�q eU/� S�-U � / � � U 89b.7 F k ,� a � S S O/NG Cc� Y �,� �� � -- s Q, ` I ��a ° � . ' ' � OR/VF. ' ,� Y 9ECT/OH CURB —_ a� 6,� o a9� � 893 r � �' � OQsq°+.� 892 3� ,� ' 60.o v 894 �—' I � BEINO 1� r � m � �R/Vtc ' � / 833 --� 4 R£AR L , , I � BF ,0 892 I � e�'� e�°-sev o ------ .�+•9 � ,�a � m .'t�i AS�S �� e�r.; � Bg� 0 ' W � ' B 6ITUM/NOUS "'"-'"��^ � — — — — . 6s° 6 \eft ! / � � � � _ OP ~-6!t 2 ��wEFf DR%VE 90 �g E91.1 , 1.3 - `= p�� RH£.�D R7wER 8B9 --�g,i� 89i ° �a� W ��' B93e G � ��- � y- --- 288.00a{: o eB9� Ut�lir taaemenf Perpoc. 4 � �4 N.88°4042'1Yx Nc'S 3979Q; 490514 baa,o ---' m W W A/ine which, ii exfended, wou/d infcrsecf the Wes? line of the S.E. %4 � v� of fhe N. K: %4 of Sec. 12, af a pornr disfanF 726 fcef Soufher/y of the � Q2 Northwrs.' corner of'tne S�'/4o{�he ni.w.% sa�d Sec.;2 ` � ° 11 R `� � W J U > � � \� � � NM ��93-Q3 `� TOP NUT NYO, O ELEV.�B��er Tam - N, 6�CiP yyaJermaiti ��� �-POrnl 600 /eet Ea�f of'!he Wesy line :;�niisry 5«,�,r 2 b��s/D� D Fi�eHyd�a.it � o1'1he S.E./q o/'fhe KW. ` oF 9ec.12 ass Manho% q u 4 �� W � 4� E �/ � / _ � � a S 88°40 42"E. q, � „ -- 288_00— us a / --- � a — '_' -� '-6esdo �,,�_ �� c�ae c� ax o�Ro�d cr�••ra menr Ooc. Na. 2B57o0 �,—_ ---- l� c ST � �Cf' STp,Q N N T�bXS 7C s tues I V E . u�f°. �9 -'�= C8 '��. >Minnt�pcl.s orn an ' Guae . � O.S � �a e�+2nt A[r0oe 6 ` ' -�� U5 �OTC - STAP�y e�z --nLt9- - s.�o-= _ — _ ETE s. ed z•E ovrtET� . . " ---�oLf1-- N��N uv��e 5 s.es�4o'a 'e. ; � AR� °''t S'"'a � a� CA7CH BASIN � 696 ,� • '��� . ( ���� 8� q TC -896.0 e�c�s T 3 FL �895_S Q� o � 4 L F-12"'RCP C ig CRqTE = 895.3 J Q � =� ��., 2 � s TORMSEWER 0_5 . INY.c89L5 ssc t V �'!tiY y W / U' / .,� e^• . o � N � 2 a�✓r «� j`��r� _� �A �an: - � •���`� 0� 02� a= � oNay . J 4 I . W �•5 o pJW - v ,� v°/ .a� � ti W Z i�� d V�m�m � mQ� y� I o- ° i� °r + ';'� � v , � _ � ce. 1:� � �_ �m ; Z � = I � J - QJ% o �� °� 2 � Crpcim a,c.o G." ss e�T I o �o�oJasc.a Q a9 � e� sa e�� oc �W , r amvv /� ,�`}�'� �% �41 0 Z � '� • iS 24.0 ky + � 1 �� � y � � 4 m . �.� ., � � � ,. , I � � ,•• E. . cnznce e � � Q J, o' m � � � a � :���° ,;�. ��� �` I . o � " F � � �-� �"N � I � �i . ' — _ _ — __ � �u• �1 I ,�",-i - � a/ � m � r�.. 5.8840't2"E. oi ��o� a� QN � 2 O �l1 � ,,� � r e�c„a 140.0o I Q e . y b �� Q .._ — ___ E�e 6 N � p �q � � I O -o a I `'1 0 . +l-. N J W- I. � . = 4,� ' � � , ?o i � � � �a:o + �2 5 a �,h y se� sa e�c.e Q 1�'m ,WE _ � � 41 p�4� 1 oar �` ° "l� g ��+ h V N � . o t ING k Q J 7�+ Q 2 °–°!� anJ L5 � la �° Y> ci k y � 3 o+!p� o yaR�R � m� � t Q � ' �� ��pXOw�� 1 � � � % : /� � .W � � I� , ��5� 0 41 I : O m :b ���V� � F � � r � 2 0:� I o� Q� Z I �W < 2� y. . ooJr J/ �O 6 i_w �• � m N MW !f � M� � �'XO J �C ,<yrv'V � • � gU • K! � r/1 g I �4 Q �l' w 3 t �` N R4 i� �'W•"i L � � o. � �g � : � 897tt .�� Z �. _ �� 2�m ` � � 3�'` • � — / a» u ti � .896a9 ' ^ i ` �' � ' B�G.� W a °j I S.is4oei x f � z �, �^ � o., p: 1 WJ � 1 �j � o — — \� �- 8g'7� \ $96 I� y� � ED B 618 � ,�.^�., � �6 � � `n � �. � • . CONCRETE' (!. � / I 30 4l � ICV �a =:' � P . OQ W� y �.• �� � � ti � ~ W ��c, 3E.o � � . SCALE �W Y � c uWi .,: = = g95 ci � �q I "' � ^ � , TOTAL z �Z �E 89�6 �� 969 ° � T 5 w I PROPOSE � N I � � 7 d9 x � 89$ n Cu,pe .w 6 93P V I W � / ST�?y " s� E9 n / � Y X� � g94 2 4 0.4- g<//� STU / B9S.7 4 �98 �$ 5 O'NG CCO �� I -- � ��a e � � OR/VE e � Y 9ECT10N CU � o� ybti _ _ o ey� RB 893 — 2C.�,y 6o a 894 u Z ,(oQ g9 492 3a,> _ ° ! ci 9ElNQ /i � m �,Q�Ye 693 - W RCAR L J I � BF .o � 8 9 Z �` ~ a�� e�°-sev � ��-9 ti � m M AS!S y� e�e..g e9� 0°' j B _ __ SlTUM/NOUS . 0 ~-E» 2 ��wEa DR%VE — n�—°•'�_ \e+� e / � r . pp !o W � �° _ o O RHEAO PoWER 89 889 �-�1"��� 91 °- Clt.t !.3_"" �awcc � o "--- Y ee�c --- 288.00-: aee.� _ ° pv 6+x� Utilify Easemen! Perpoc. ---- � q N.88°40aZ�Y�I. Na s 3979d1 f 4907C eea,o rp W W A/ine which, iF ezfended, wou/d inJcrsecf the W�; /ine of the S.E.%� W��n oFfhe N. h: %4 oFSec_ 12, af a poinf disfant � 26 fc�i Soufherly of the �� � NorfhWest corner o/' 1he SE '/� o{fhe N.W. /� said Sec. 1 2. � ? e� zm 11S T,� < �cL-���-�l� Su[��.�t�ts t�"�" �_ � . CITY OF FRIDLEY p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAT APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: l C ` /� L . / ,� _ - � : �' / �% C..0 N . Property Identification Number (PIN) {2 � `� 3 n .� � � �% �; r Legal description: �,�}i��' c� � �c� j L �. VL'. �j- Lot Block TracdAddition Current zoning: _� j Squaze foota.ge/acreage i 1�i- �`�-� S�►t-�� , Z•� ��A( Reason for plat: � c � � l�t,+, .� }� cc.(Z �,c .� c�.t,,� e _ Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes �_ No If yes, which city? � 2/ 7 L�. � If yes, what rype of business? `�Q S� Q` W1 F��— Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No i� FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee NAME �r2 c= ' � ��� � ADDRESS SIGNATURE l � ;-- f � must sign this form prior to processing) � ., — - DAYTIlVIE PHONE DATE r1 � PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME� C�' �---t t�' C�.-� �I. I O�-Nv1 ADDRES S � �'�� i=�� iZ C� S� D� 1� r2 N-�� i � t� q L'� ,/L�i SIGNATURE �.. DAYTIME PHONE �% � �F `� y �F `�L DATE � >I ' Fee: $500.00 for 201ots $ 15.00 for each additional lot Pecmit P.S. # �?� -D7�_ Receipt # �,I � ,� Application received by: Scheduled Planning Commission date: � l/ `� 3 Scheduled City Council date: 11T _ _ UIYOF �R[DLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(6l2) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 July 16, 1993 Advanced Surveys & Engineering Company 5300 S. Highway No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Gentlemen: Subject: Tam Addition Drainage Review The following are items to be addressed concerning the above subject. PW93-139 1. Provide hydrology calcu(ations and determine ponding volumes. Show calculations for ponding volumes. Provide a minimum of one foot of freeboard on the pond. 2. Provide hydraulic calculations for restricted outlet and pipe design. 3. Locate pond entirely on private property. 4. Provide skimmer structure detail for outlet of pond. 5. Show driveway elevation. The driveway should be designed to prevent runoff from entering from Fireside Drive. 6. Provide a rip-rap detail, include filter fabric under rip-rap. 7. A pond maintenance agreement needs to be executed between the owner and City of Fridley. 8. Include an erosion control plan. 9. Additional comments may be forthcoming pending further review. Sincerely, Scott Erickson Assistant Public Works Director 11U CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING, AIIGII3T 11, 1993 _______________________________________________________________�_ CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Newman called the August 11, 1993, Planning Commission meeting to o'rder at 7:30 p.m. / ROLL CALL• Members Present: Members Absent: Dave Newman, Dave Brad Sielaff, Conn Diane Savage, �Roy Oquist , Dean Saba, Others Present: Barbara D y, Community Development Director Michel cPherson, Planning Assistant Oliv Tam, 1150 Fireside Drive N.E. J ce Moen, 1128 - 63rd Avenue N.E. oyce Trebisovsky, 1130 Fireside Drive N.E. MOTIONi35y Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the July 28, �f93, Planning Commission minutes as written. ' A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER30N NEWMAN DECLARED MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S. �9_3-03, BY OLIVER TAM, TAM ADDITION: To replat property described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E. 11V PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGUST 11, 1993 PAGE 2 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL YOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is processing three land use requests. One is a plat request to subdivide the subject parcel which is addressed as 1160 Fireside Drive, located between the two mobile home parks east of Highway 65 into three lots. The second request is to rezone a portion of the subject parcel from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District. The third request is a variance request to address the existing encroachments by the restaurant facility currently located on the property. On August 17, 1993, the Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance request to the City Council. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is proposing to replat the existing parcel into three separate parcels. Two parcels are proposed to be used for two new four-unit residential dwellings, and the third parcel is for the existing restaurant facility. There are currently two dwelling units on the lots proposed for the two new four-unit dwellings. Ms. McPherson stated the lots for the multiple family dwellings meet the minimum lot area and lot width requirements as required by the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District. Each lot meets the minimum 15,000 square foot area requirement and also meets the minimum lot width of 85 feet. Each parcel has a minimum of 25 feet of access from a public street. The second lot achieves its access via a"flag lot". While typically a flag lot is not an ideal subdivision pattern, there is adequate room on the remainder of the parcel for a cul-de-sac should the parcel change use at a later date, and additional right-of-way could be dedicated to the east of the easterly lot line and a public street could be constructed for a future subdivision. Ms. McPherson stated the remaining portion of the subject parcel is for the existing restaurant facility. The lot area exceeds the minimum of 35,000 square feet as required for the C-3, General Shopping Center District. There is not a minimum lot width requirement in the C-3 district, however, there is adequate room on site for the parcel to meet the minimum setback and parking requirements, with the exception of the two existing encroachments on the southwest corner of the property for the restaurant facility. Ms. McPherson stated a portion of the restaurant's parking lot and access does encroach onto the multiple family lot as proposed. Cross parking and access easements will need to be recorded against both the proposed restaurant property as well as the proposed multiple dwelling property. 11W PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 3 Ms. McPherson stated that as part of the overall plat request, the petitioner is proposing to improve the parking lot and provide the required B618 concrete curb and gutter as required City Code. A landscaping plan should be submitted by the petitioner to provide adequate screening and buffering between the restaurant facility and the proposed multi-unit buildings. detention facility will also be required as part of the parking lot upgrade. The Engineering Department will require the by A petitioner to sign and record against the property a storm water pond maintenance agreement. The Engineering Department has reviewed the preliminary grading plan and has submitted a list of comments via the surveyor to the petitioner. Ms. McPherson stated that as the plat request meets the minimum requirements of each of the zoning districts, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit the information requested in Scott Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993, regarding the stormwater pond and the grading and drainage plan. 2. The petitioner shall record against proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Tam Addition, cross parking and access easements. 3. � The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a stormwater pond maintenance agreement. 5. The park dedication shall be $1,500 per lot,for the residential portion and $.023 per square foot for the remaining portion for the restaurant facility. (shall be paid at the time of the issuing of the building permit - for residential) Mr. Newman stated that access to the flag lot would really be through the parking lot and that the residential property would have to negotiate parking spaces with the restaurant property. Has the City ever done anything like this before? Ms. McPherson stated that typically most of the cross parking easements have occurred between two commercial properties or two industrial properties. In reviewing this request, the City Assessor suggested that perhaps the flag could be rotated so that the flag portion is on the westerly side, and the access would then occur over the driveway for the other multiple family dwelling. Then, the back yard of the second multiple family dwelling would be facing the restaurant facility. However, that eliminates the potential for any future subdivision and public roadway. 11X PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGIIST 11 1993 PAGE 4 Mr. Kondrick stated that when the restaurant is having a successful evening, the possibility exists that there will be times when there are no parking spaces for the multiple family dwellings. Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is proposing a four stall garage. If that is a concern, the owner can post a sign reserving the first four stalls for additional parking. That has been done for commercial developments. Mr. Newman stated that if, in fact, the multiple family property is under separate ownership from the restaurant property, then how is the City going to get the additional 25 feet to put in the public roadway. Ms. Dacy stated that in answer to that concern, as part of the plat request, they should reserve a 25 foot street easement along the entire length of the flag to reserve that option. Maybe the following two stipulations should be added in the event the restaurant property should ever return to residential: 6. If ththeeSarkingtlot encroachmentsis�removeddfromathese use, p two properties. 7. The dedication of the street easement Mr. Oliver Tam stated he is the owner of the Rice Bowl Restaurant. He stated he is very appreciative of staff's ideas and suggestions to make the lot work for everyone involved. Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner agreed with the stipulations recommended by staff. Mr. Tam stated he had no problems with the stipulations. Mr. Newman asked if the petitioner understood that the City may require a 25 foot street easement. Mr. Tam stated he had no objection to that, whatever works best for the property. Ms. Joyce Trebisovsky, 1130 Fireside Drive N.E., stated she represents Park Plaza Mobile Home Park aadkEntalotMobiex anded to Park. Her only concern is that if the p g p the right side of the property, there should be some typeaok- barrier so the lights do not shine into the mobile home p Mr. Newman stated that, at this time, there is no proposal to move the parking lot. If in the future, the owner decides to replat the restaurant property and break it into residential in then at that time a public street would go in. However, lots, o awa If any of all likelihood the parking lot would also g Y- 11Y PLANNING COMMISSION ME�TING. AUGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 5 this happens, there would be another public hearing, notices would be sent out, and this process would repeat itself. Ms. Trebisovsky thanked Mr. Newman for this clarification. Mr. Saba stated he did not think it is a good situation to have a cross parking easement between commercial and residential. Ms. McPherson stated the proposed multi-family units are not intended to be the typical general occupancy units. They are for Mr. Ta�'s family and employees of the Rice Bowl, and he will be the owner of both the properties. Ms. Modig stated that is fine for the present time; but if, in the future, Mr. Tam sells the property, then there is a parking lot situation with a cross parking easement and two pieces of property under separate ownership. Ms. Dacy stated there have been instances on commercial properties where signs reserving parking spaces are successful. The Code requires eight parking spaces for each multi-family dwelling unit, and they already have four garage spaces. That leaves only four spaces that are needed, and she believed those spaces can be reserved. She did not see a big conflict with the cross parking easement. Ms. Modig stated the only times she could see the parking being a problem is during private parties or large events at the restaurant. Ms. Dacy stated that if the Commission feels strongly about this, then one solution would be to flipflop the flag to the west side of the property. Mr. Saba stated he could not see a problem with a cross parking easement with commercial/commercial properties, but he did see potential problems with commercialJresidential. Ms. Modig stated she did not see a problem now with the proposed usage of the multiple family units by Mr. Tam's family members. Her concern is for the future. If the property is sold and the new owners do not want the cross parking easement, does the City have to get involved? Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending that the cross parking easement be executed as part of the plat approval. If there are any changes, then both owners would have to agree to that. Ms. Dacy stated that in looking at the plat, there might be enough area on site ta create a little pad for four parking spaces on each lot separate from the commercial property. Staff could work with the petitioner on this. y1Z PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 11, 1993 PAGE 6 MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M. Mr. Newman stated staff has done the best they can with some undesirable choices. He did not particularly like the cross parking easement, b�t he did think that keeping the flag on the east side of the property preserves some options for the future. There might be some problems with the cross parking easement in the future, but those are the types of issues that are better left resolved by the property owners. In the cases of redevelopment, there are going to be some problems in working around existing structures. He stated he is comfortable with approving the plat with the stipulations as recommended by staff, with the addition of a stipulation to vacate the street easement and to terminate the cross parking easement upon change in use of restaurant or discontinuation of use of the lot. Mr. Saba stated he is not comfortable with the cross parking easement. It is a good situation.now, but what about the future? What if the restaurant changes to a night club, and there are even �ore cars in the parking lot? He would like to see something else worked out with the parking. Ms. Modig stated that she did not have a problem with the flag lot. She would like to figure out something to do with the cross parking easement if it becomes a problem in the future without having to go through this whole process again. Ms. Dacy asked if the Commission members would like staff to explore the possibility of finding a separate area for eight spaces other than on the comme_rcial lot. Ms. Modig stated she is just concerned about the cross parking becoming an issue in the future, and it may never be an issue. Mr. Sielaff stated that if it is possible, he would like to see the parking kept on the residential lots to prevent any future parking problems. Mr. Kondrick stated he would also be in favor of the present configuration with access into the lots with eight parking spaces on the residential lots. Mr. Newman stated he had no problem with that, except that would mean blacktopping more area of the overall site to put in eight more stalls. Ms. Modig stated she would be comfortable with trying to put eight parking spaces on the residential lots. 1 yAA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, ADGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 7 MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend approval of preliminary plat, P.S. #93-03, by Oliver Tam, Tam Addition, to replat property described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall submit the information requested in Scott Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993, regarding the stormwater pond and the grading and drainage plan. 2. The petitioner shall record against proposed Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Tam Addition, cross parking and access easements. � 4. The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a stormwater pond maintenance agreement. 5. The park dedication shall be $1,500 per lot for the residential portion and $.023 per square foot for the remaining portion for the restaurant facility. Payment of the park dedication fee for the residential properties shall be paid at the time of the issuance of the building permit. � 7. Mr. Newman motion, he parking. situation. A 25 foot street easement shall be dedicated on the easterly portion of the flag lot for a future road. Staff shall work with the petitioner to provide eight parking spaces within both residential lots. stated that although he would vote in favor of the did not think they need to require this additional However, it is a good approach to a difficult - - � _ � Community Development Department PLANIVING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 9, 1993 TO: William Burns, City Manager��� FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Establish Public Hearing for Rezoning Request, ZOA #93-01, by Oliver Tam; 1160 Fireside Drive N.E. The Planning Commission reviewed the rezoning request by Oliver Tam to rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center to R-3, Multiple Family Dwelling, at its August 11, 1993 meeting. The Fridley Zoning Code requires that the City Council conduct a public hearing for all rezoning requests. Staff recommends that the City Council establish September 27, 1993 as the date of the public hearing. MM/dn M-93-498 REQUEST Permit Number Applicant Proposed Request �ocation SITE DATA Size Density Present Zoning Present Land Use(s) Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use(s) Utilities Park Dedication Watershed District ANALYSIS �inancial I mplication s Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations � RECONIMENDATION Staff Appeals Commission � Planning Commission � _ Author - 1"IM:ls S TAFF REP O RT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date Planning Commission Date August 11, 1993 City Council Date� September 13, 1993 ZOA #93-01 Oliver Tam To rez�e a portion of a paroel fn�n C-3, General Shopping �n�ter District, to F�-3, General Multipl.e Dwelling 1160 Firesic�e Drive 114,048 sq. ft.; 2.61 acres C-3, General Shopping Center Dis trict Retaii/Residential R-4, Mobile Home Park, to E& W; C-3, General Shopping Center District, to S& N; N�l, Lic�t Industrial, to the S Residential tA the E& W; Vacant to the S; Retail to the N Rioe Creek Approval with stipulations Approval with stipulations `,s� ��� � +�vi'Y � ...,.Lr � (3(sd ' ' ZOA �F93-01 Oliver Tam lV' //2 SEC. /2, T. 31�, R. 2� n C/TY OF FRlDLEY � 2� `� I � �2 24 ,` 3 � 13 O � I ia��, . � , �� 11EE LOCATlON MAP ZOA ��93-01 Oliver Tam � ,r-� r,��rT' 1 � FF ZONING MAP Staff Report ZOA #93-01, Page 2 Request 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam The petitioner requests that a rezoning be approved to rezone Lots 2 and 3, Tam Addition, from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling. The request is for 1160 Fireside Drive. The rezoning request is for parcels which do not currently exist. The petitioner is processing a plat request to subdivide the subject parcel into three parcels. The petitioner is also processing a variance request to correct existing encroachments for the restaurant located on one of the subject parcels. Site Located on the subject parcel is Tam's Fireside Rice Bowl Restaurant and two dwelling units. The property is zoned C-3, General Shopping Center District, as are the properties to the north and south. The properties to the east and west are zoned R- 4, Mobile Home Park. Analysis Three criteria need to be evaluated in analyzing any rezoning request: 1. 2. District compatibility with adjacent uses and zoning. District intent. 3. Whether or not the parcel meets the district requirements. The petitioner has indicated that the two subject parcels, Lots 2 and 3 of the proposed Tam's Addition, will be used for two new 4- unit buildings. Currently located on the property are two dwelling units which are nonconforming in the C-3, General Shopping Center District. Because R-4 zoning and uses exist on both sides of the parcel, rezoning the parcels to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling, should not cause any adverse impact. The intent of the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District is to provide zoning for multiple family, two-family, and single family dwellings. The existing and proposed uses of the subject parcel are consistent with the intent of the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling district, and would eliminate an existing nonconformity. 11 GG Staff Report ZOA #93-01, 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam Page 3 The proposed subject parcels meet the minimum requirements of the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District, regulations. The minimum lot area, lot width, and access requirements are met by the subject parcels as they are proposed to be subdivided. The proposed location of the new dwelling units conform to the setback requirements, and the existing dwelling units would also comply with the setback requirements in their present locations. Recommendation As the proposed rezoning request meets the criteria used to evaluate rezoning requests, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to the City Council with one stipulation: 1. P.S. #93-03 shall be approved. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the rezoning request to the City Council. Citv Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission action. 11HH � � -H CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 �I �' � (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REZONII�TG APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: % � �`"✓ � �t' %1 e�` � �flC� , � Y2 �Yv �'� . /�1- �- _ ��l � O � �/ Property Identification Number (PIN)_ ��`� � O a�- a�{-- � o O� Legal description: _ �,9-�� c�'� ��e.� f,Z /�%.L�% � Lot Block � TracdAddition Cunrent zoning: C� Square footagelacrea.ge �' /� ��� � 0 2�• G��� C Requesting zoning: Reason for rezoning Have you opera.ted a nusmess in a ciry wtucn requ�red a business license'! Yes �_ No If yes, which city? T IZ �` �J �� , If yes, what type of business? �1 '�s��l �,l1,l�-c��— Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No � FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PETITIOI� NAME � ADDRESS � SIGNATURE � L� � v �--� � .� DAYTIlVIE PHONE DATE � 7 -� 2. DAYTIMEPHONE "7�°�i —��- �� Z DATE �f-�21'I J� Fee: $300.00 - — ' � 1 � � Permit ZOA # �'D I Receirt # Application received by: Scheduled Planning Commission date: I 1 �� Scheduled City Council daxe: 111i pLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING AIIGIIST 11 1993 PAGE 8 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWM2�N DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOOSLY. 2, PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING ZOA 93-01 BY OLIVER TAM: To rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling on property described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. UPON OTIONCCARRIED AND THEIPOBLIC�HEARINGEOPEN AT�8z15Dp M�ED THE M Ms. McPherson stated that currently, the two dwelling units are located on the same parcel as the restaurant. These dwelling units are currently nonconforming as residential uses are not permitted in the C-3, General Shopping Center District. In order to allow the petitioner to even upgrade the existing dwellings or construct new ones as he is proposing, the property needs to be rezoned from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling. Ms. McPherson stated the rezoning request only pertains to the proposed lots for the multiple family dwelling units. The remaining parcel will remain C-3, General Shopping Center District. Ms. McPherson stated three criteria need to be evaluated in analyzing any rezoning request: l. � District compatibility with adjacent uses and zoning District intent 11 JJ pLANNING COMMISSION MEBTING AIIGOST 11 1993 PAGE 9 3. Whether or not the parcel meets the district requirements Ms. McPherson stated that as discussed earlier during the plat request, the proposed iots under the sui�division ordinance meet the minimum requirements of the R-3, General.Multiple Dwelling District. Also, the proposed use of the twv lots for multiple family dwelling units is also consistent with the purpose of the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District, which is to provide zoning for multiple family, two family, and single family dwellings. Ms. McPherson stated the adjacent properties are zoned R-4, Mobile Home Park, so rezoning the two properties to R-3 would not have an adverse impact on the R-4 residential zoning. Ms. McPherson stated that as the request meets the criteria for evaluation of a rezoning request, staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the rezoning request with one stipulation: l. Preliminary plat request, P.S. #93-03, shall be approved. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public hearing. , IIPON A VOICE VOTE, AI,L DOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THS PQBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend to City Council approval of rezoning, ZoA #93-01, by Oliver Tam, to rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling on property described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., with the following stipulation: 11KK 1- Preliminary plat request, P.S. #93-03, shall be approved_ UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated the City Council will conduct a public hearing for the preliminary plat and rezoning requests on September 27, 1993. 3• SAV � 93-p3 $y THE CITY �F FRIDLEY: To vacate all easements as donated and dedicated to the public for drainage and utility purposes and as shown on the recorded plat of Shorewood Plaza, as corrected by Surveyor's Certifica files as Document No. 176792. Al1 in Anoka County, Minnesota. This property is generally located at the inter ction of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between H'ghway 65 and Central Avenue. The subject parcels include the East and W st Moore Lake Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet im and Health Club, and Sears Outlet. Ms. McPherson stated the Planning Commiss'on recently reviewed a plat request by the City of Fridle to plat which was approved by the City in 987at New easements forza utility, drainage, and bikeway/walkwa purposes are to be dedicated on the new revised plat. n order to avoid any confusion, staff is suggesting tha the existing easements which are not being utilized by the ut' ities or various bikeway/ walkways be vacated prior to re ording the plat with its associated easements. A numbe of utilities constructed within this development were not lo ated within the easements as they were dedicated. The City i ensuring that appropriate easements are being dedicated over ose utilities to provide proper access for the City. Ms. McPherson stated Commission recommen. will ensure that t e recording of the ew �'taff recommends that the Planning approval of this vacation request. Staff vacation ordinance is recorded prior to the plat. MOTI�N by Mr. aba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend to City Council appr al of SAV #93-03, by the City of Fridley to vacate all easemeryts as donated and dedicated to the and utili�i purposes and as shown on the recordedlplat�ofdrainage Shorewo Plaza, as corrected by Surveyor's Certificate files as Docume No. 176792. All in Anoka County, Minnesota. This property is generally located at the intersection of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Highway 65 and Central Avenue. 11LL U � � -� DATE: Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley September 9, 1993 TO: William Burns, City Manager A�� ��t FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Establish Public Hearing for Vacation Request, SAV #93-03, by the City of Fridley � The Planning Commission reviewed the vacation request by the City of Fridley, to vacate all easements within the Shorewood Plaza plat at its August 11, 1993 meeting. The City Charter requires the City Council to conduct a public hearing regarding all vacation requests. Staff recommends that the City Council establish September 27, 1993 as the date of the public hearing. MM/dn M-93-499 ;� REQUEST Permit Number Applicant Proposed Request �ocation SITE DATA Size Densit�r Present Zoning Present Land Use(s) Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use(s) Utilities Park Dedication � Watershed District ANALYSIS Financial Implications Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations � RECOMMENDATION Staff Appeals Commission Planning Commission Author NIl�I:1s S TAFF REP O RT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date Planning Commission Date August 11, 1993 City Council Date : September 13, 1993 SAV #9 3-0 3 City of Fridley To vacate all easements dedicated on the plat of Shorewood Plaza Highway 65 and East Nbore Lake Drive C-3, General Shopping Center District Retail C-3, Gerieral Shopping Center, to the W; 1�1, Single Family Dwelling, to the N& E; P, Public, to the S Retail to the W, Residential to the N& E, Park to the S N/A Ric� C�eek Approval Approval � -- Staff Report SAV #93-03, City of Fridley Page 2 Request The City of Fridley, in conjunction with the adjacent property owners are currently processing a replat of Shorewood Plaza. The replat request is required in order to correct errors which occurred during the design of East Moore Lake Drive N.E. Related to the replat request is a vacation request to vacate existing easements dedicated as part of the original Shorewood Plaza plat. The request is generally located between Central Avenue and Highway 65 on either side of East Moore Lake Drive. The properties involved include the old Shorewood Shopping Center, the Sears Outlet building, the Moore Lake Racquet, Swim & Health Club, and East Moore Lake Commons. The Planning Commission reviewed the revised plat at its July 14, 1993, meeting. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the revised plat as proposed. Dedicated on the plat are new utility easements for bikeway/walkway purposes as well as drainage and utility easements for the various utilities serving the development. The utilities as installed do not fall within the easements originally dedicated on the Shorewood Plaza plat. These easements should therefore be vacated as they are unnecessary The necessary easements will be recorded when the revised plat is recorded at the County. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the vacation request to the City Council. Planninq Commission Action The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission action. 1100 r - - ... .� P�'G LiM intil �zY �L�T S�ID�C �OD� �L,� ZA _ �� � h / . \ /' '_��p /I ' H1� , v • �- � t 1` �N�,�, . ,i-4L;�' ' \ i 0,�1e; �,+ ��� :-,. � �- . ,, :.�. , �f//?•=��`�,y � '�;o `�%�,4 ,: �i . ..�i /?�� \ `• :. ir � r ti _� �//,/> . � � �`\ �e �S�/`��, , i :r o' P z � O . \ � I •4 . . i •� � + � � ! � / � I� ��! � / .. . ` . -`i ., �`:. . �, � _ S �'H�� _ � 1'� `�� � \ ' Oe: .I��. `^ ' ; ' ..._'"_' ' _..___ � y . I_ .��. ;% , .:.:�, ..: :,... � f� '' j - - -�°i . . ?� _, ' _: r! i ;� - _ �. _ '� '_ . a�►�.K� 'n ` =r "� - _.. ; . _ j.. �; ; ; � ; ; �_: .. ; . , ;;�- . _ - - ' . .. . ;::9_ - �. _ _ - � .. , ,` ` ! ', - .. `� �"-.�..._r 1 � _ `j �a `_ ..... � _�— � _� 7571 — � MooRE p LAKE ��---�_ '� _ .`_' �.:...,, �.;< 4. b'� • �..� .{ w•........ �.w I� I _ �T/ ��. I � __ � Fl�; •�� �. ' ' _" _ _ �• ! _. � Se ' 1 � ,�� , I (�^ d i. I ..= 1 . I'� :! •, t i . '�� . I! . I1 . �I i •� i � � i i I . L � � ,! ' '.,'� i I -_�j _ __'- — i . . _l ` L�� � � 1 j-- - — µ . s..� /j �� � i.,..•..� �c. . t• 11PP Original Easements to be Vacated � I 1 � . � w PRELIMINARY PLAT . � SHOREWOOD ' PLAZA REVISED . • .. � . r .,, � �^� �°,. .�a. � �. .�m ,� .,. �.�. , .. ���.a„ �..� ��, �........� �:.:.. �� � �N�own0 n�u. .r N re�la� 1� R++n�� M.�� !�. �a� Ow+l. r �+�.� M�� w� rn� y.M+� I�W w�tt el wu� 4u YIMIM 1/ �.! .rxl� M 1�� Yt ti�� 1w�Y.�.r Wtsv� w'tw wtrl IR�u Ylpw� .�f. ��w���`��Y�� " ..mr:t- •�u� r. .f....� 9.199! ; �=:; ��-�: �,...�,: ��, � � c.� o..��,� � . u.. �r���— I�at l. l: aubt �. l..a s..a Rw<u4W �i .. - �W�+r41A � �af�m� tlu� IruM� N �le�u� �. t 't� / � Y, �� 4• . 1.LL �`i`�y•'���,����, IMII �IVIY111�IY u.:.w wr ri...'. u.w r...a natin �r. ni �i �� ...�u . .b..a m��r e u. r�...� .n.nm w..�. u ....�.a . w w�u�i ...�n r a..nu.a uemrx w. ltMt t� a W� <Li.., u �V:C C:KE�K 1'•.:tItK.4: . .. o.r� mr .ru r. w�.srwr.� a u. twl rLa. „ .�w.,.:.�..�.,�,�.....�..�w ��._,..a _...�. � .��� WF � d� ,. , _ J . e�,.H..w�w�..u.,w. .��,� ..�..:�,..,. ,:,, - ,.,,. � u�rit � . f Ima .�b la Iuw� �N'.Y� /�eYd'�1. L :Iti'�� SK!i :.(JL ll'1r�N �—� �• � � /,. �, _ �..sc �r - w �m� .w tx .WaM �V.+t. vw�..r 1ra.ua.'.1�+. ' '..�s Y. U Isa .r K Imt .Y� W�r �M.R� /rP�. \`/ PU': LCil' b u.rs -o' • �a w� .w. �a .n.� W w�w. +�r. .�+ �•d•�+w r�.�.+• /' �.uww. • u.�e -r - u �.w .a. �a tw.w �4wr -.urr kw. 4��?:4k_Y4U.^. � uS:l _ O UTLOT B • � �� r.w�. w! .r �..�.+� ��.w r r.+ w�ww wvw. - � fj ��� ..-mu m.m. \� VR r � e r-M ��r m.m «w� .� w� ... u.v ... I^ �in ��. •r.:: I , t.:.:c::l \ 4y O • • ' r" � .... e ...�� � ��/�i:, . �.�E � / ��• � � ..,:''''�.._/ � �I .v � � "���:;':,� ; � OUTLOT A / Q' � I .' � " � � i � j �oT ` . � 41 / O W � [ . •.t.V�ti �� � � �'T�'�Y / O,L � W N > �'O RE � ��T , �-' �.�% :�� � � � ,o � IqKE �OT 'C` � �' � L,� �� / " �OT WESt A �'/ �//�• j.' LOT 3. J C, ,.,. y e FrAI� � '� f ;,c Q 2 z '^�..�t ... COL•K 4 E+ITER �� �/ � /�' BLOCK 2 �' I ��„ ? � �c�a � � f, ` Q , a � 't o� '/ 4i di . = i O�� , ��`V J I � � � � o � ' �4/ MOORE I.AKE EAST t ' : � �I) i � • . Y S ✓�� j . w.«... � ....� � EAST MOORE � "LAKt I�` yJ j- �r..✓� ww. i II'� � � i --- -: =---='- - -- ' � ��� � t.. t i. u�.ac.n t o.:c:v:wcc.t� r•:::c.� 1i � W �, � LOT 1 , BLOCK � � +- - � � < W >` ` r'Y', 1.�, � � i� �MOORE LAKE RAGQUET Q ��i -- = a� �� � � �� sE.P.RS ' � . L awiM � �r.���r►+ cwe � , � � SUR�LU� �I 'Y+ O O ; - I. V! RtTA1L ` t S� � ' i �� cexZeR +' �, � a,i, O, ` l0T 2': Q I, ' � '' K 3 1 , ^ �r I,W,rc,•- j' `J ..v' r �•�� ,° 3I � BLOCK 2 �.- � � �'� s' � .ti r Q� 1 � � � � � . , z � , /� '� � ;o � � Irr��-4 j r. I � y` .—.''.�..-r._.� I I � �=J�_ '^'_ O • „t" �l� � uY :il I �r.., . a P v _- I :.7:.�TOx°� :.F:Eb � I � N . •',_ep:�r,5:-u .. . y j� � ucT f 1:.). 93 I �••�•• •,S.:iA'�CY s J � �� , 1.iVITGR".� — �/ I ... .. _ � � I - -- � � ...., .._,,. �.� ..... ��••b��,.,�, _ _� Q � � o .NUML't.il stl / I � i 1• ....'c o . .. . _ I • , • / , .� "_'�__ .. ' -:.-�' � l �..artv wa.�a.r+ �c• _ _ _ � "' "'_'�—' " �- - .� �� -.i —� ���`� . _' _ _ .� ' ' �\ - MOORE LAKE ' » Y r ,t, ,r • u..n.�c �x..�c W FIaT 1CAll � 111KM • W r6tT —.— � �w�T�.1aY w � —� — � NO�M MMVI � Y�RlC��Oy - . � - —.— . w.Ttw vu.�.� ---�Mw.Lt \/wY��VIIY 4KMCN�I.�NL � --- � ��K��.L Y a V.�IMW� 4w J �.�� . KK�aTOr w0lAGUl� �O i�sw•. CYAO � ■ QQ �i • �Iwl MvDRµT I New water/Sewer/Drainage Easements P� � 1. preliminary plat request, P•S• #93 approved. / RPERSON NEAM�►N DECLARED �shall be UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOII5LY Ms. McPherson stated t City Council for the pre ' inary plat and hearing 27 - will conduct a public rezoning requests on September , 3, SAV 93-03 BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: To vacate all easements as donated and dedicated to the public for drainage and ur oses and as shown on the recorded plat of utility p P gu�-veyor's Certificate Shorewood Plaza, as corrected by files as Document No. 176792. All in Anoka County, Minnesota. f This property is generally located at the intershWay 65°and Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Hig Central Avenue. The subject parcels include the East e�dsWimtarid°Healthe Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racqu Club and Sears Outlet. Ms. McPherson stated the Planning Commission recently reviewed a the City of Fridley to replat the Shorewood Plaza plat request by the City in 1987- New easements for plat which was approved by ur oses are to be utility, drainaqe, and bikeway/Wal�aY P P dedicated on the new revised plat. In order to avoid any confusion, staff is suggesting that the existing easements which are not being utilized by the utilities or various bikeway/ walkways be vacated prior to recording the plat with its associated easements. A number �� uthintthe easem ntseas theyn this development were not located Wl that appropriate easements were dedicated. The City is ensuring rovide proper access are being dedicated over those utilities to p for the City. est. Staff � Ms. McPherson staend atarovalCOf thas vacation Pe�nln ', � Commission recomm PP rior to the � will ensure that the via�tion ordinance is recorded p f the new p record�ng o seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend to City MOTION by Mr. Saba, b the City o£ Fridley to vacate Council approval of SAV #93-03, Y ublic for drainage all easements as donated and dedicated to the p �at of and utility purposes and as shown on the recorded p Shorewood Plaza, as corrected bY�kauCounty,SMinnesotaate files as Document No. 176792. All in An This property is qenerally located at the intershWay°65°and Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Hig Central Avenue. 11RR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AOGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 11 The subject parcels include the East and West Moore Lake Shopping Centers, the Northwest Raaquet Swim and Health Club, and Sears Outlet. UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 4. RECEIVE JULY 8 1993 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receiv the July 8, 1993, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON/��1'��IMAN DECLARED THE MOTiON CARRIED IINANiMOIISLY. 5. � MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by� . Sielaff, to receive the July 27, 1993, Appeals Commission 'nutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING E, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIS . ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Mr. Kondr , seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a v ice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Newman declared the mot on carried unanimously and the August 11, 1993, Planning Commi�on meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. ly submitted, ntf� �Saba � - cording Secretary 11 SS � _ � DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department PLANIVING DIVISION City of Fridley September 9, 1993 William Burns, City Manager �r��" Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Establish Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat Request, P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat of Shorewood Plaza Revised by the City of Fridley at its July 14, 1993 meeting. The subdivision ordinance, Chapter 211 of the Fridley City Code, requires the City Council to conduct public hearings for all plat requests. Staff recommends that the City Council establish September 27, 1993 as the date of the public hearing. MM/dn M-93-500 � S TAFF REP O RT � Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date Planning Commission Date: July 14 , 1993 City Council Date : September 13, 1993 REQUEST Permit Number Applicant ' Proposed Request Location SITE DATA Size Density Present Zoning Present Land Use(s) Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use(s) Utilities Park Dedication Watershed District ANALYSIS Financia! Implications Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations RECONIMENDATION Staff Appeals Commission Planning Commission Author �/dn P.S. ��93-02 City of Fridley To replat Shorewood Plaza to correct survey errors Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive C-3, General Shopping Center District Retail C-3, General Shopping Center to the West; R-1, Single Family Dwelling to the North and East; P, Public, to the South. Retail to the West, residential to the North and East, park to the South. N/A Rice Creek Approval Approval Staff Report P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley Shorewood Plaza Revised Page 2 Request The City of Fridley, in conjunction with the adjacent property owners, are proposing to replat the plat of Shorewood Plaza. The request is in order to correct errors which occurred during the design of East Moore Lake Drive N.E. Approval of the revised plat will allow recording of bikeway/walkway, drainage, and utility easements on the properties. The request is generally located between Central Avenue and Highway 65 on either side of East Moore Lake Drive. Properties involved include the old Shorewood Shopping Center, the Sears Outlet building, the Moore Lake Racquet, Swim, and Health Club, and East Moore Lake Commons. Historv The original Shorewood Plaza plat was approved by the City Council in 1987. The plat review and approval was to allow development of the adjacent properties. The City was also redesigning East Moore Lake Drive to accommodate the inareased traffic. The City's consultant had not designed the road to meet Minnesota State Aid Street requirements, and the street design needed to be realigned. As a result of the realignment, additional right-of-way not dedicated on the recorded plat was needed to accommodate the redesigned East Moore Lake Drive. A surveyor's certificate of correction was recorded; however, easements for bikeway/walkway, street, drainage, and utility purposes were unable to be recorded against the plat. The original Shorewood Plaza plat did not include the property containing the old Shorewood Shopping Center located at the corner of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive. The revised plat will include this parcel. As part of the revised Shorewood Plaza plat, there are a number of outlots as well as a lot line between Lot 1, Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 2, Shorewood Plaza Revised. Property ta the west of this line is Torrens property, and property to the east of this line is Abstract. A lot line must be created where the boundaries between Torrens and Abstract property occur. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum lot area and lot width requirements for the C-3, General Shopping Center District regulations. Road Curvatures In order to correct the errors created by the change in alignment, additional right-of-way must be dedicated for East Moore Lake Drive. The following road curvatures must be corrected: 12B Staff Report P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley Shorewood Plaza Revised Page 3 * The north edge of East Moore Lake Drive in front of the old shopping center. * The south edge of East Moore Lake Drive in front of East Moore Lake Commons. Please refer to the drawings entitled �'Curvature Correction" which depict the changes in right-of-way. Utility Easements Bikeway/Walkway As part of the East Moore Lake Commons development, a bikeway/ walkway was installed adjacent to the south curb of East Moore Lake Drive. This bikeway/walkway was not constructed within the right- of-way; therefore, a bikeway/walkway easement defined as Utility Easements B and D will be dedicated on the plat. In addition, a bikeway/walkway was proposed for the southwest corner of the Moore Lake Racquet, Swim, and Health Club property as part of the original development. This bikeway/walkway was not constructed; however, the City retained an easement in order to construct a bikeway/walkway in the future. Please refer to the map entitled, "Bikeway/Walkway Easements" for the depiction of the location of the bikeway/walkway easements. Sewer, Water, and Drainage Easements The original Shorewood Plaza plat had a number of easements dedicated for utility purposes. The utilities serving the new development were not constructed within the originally dedicated easements. The easements depicted on the map entitled, "Water, Sewer, Drainage Easements" must be dedicated in order to allow the City to access these utilities. Those easements which are depict�ed as "hatched" areas are drainage easements, and contain storm water detention ponds for the development. A vacation request to vacate all easements dedicated under the original Shorewood Plaza plat will be processed by the City and recorded prior to recording the revised plat. Outlot B The City is currently working with the City of New Brighton in order to use the treated water from the Twin City Army Ammunitions Plant. A booster station is proposed to be located on Outlot B of the Shorewood Plaza Revised plat. The City is currently negotiating with the property owner to acquire either all or a portion of Outlot B. It is possible that the booster station could 12C � Staff Report P.S. #93-02, by Shorewood Plaza Page 4 the City of Fridley Revised be located on Outlot B with a single family dwelling unit. The praposed drawing, entitled "Tentative Lot Split for Outlot B, Shorewood Plaza" indicates a single family dwelling unit and the booster station located on Outlot B. While the preliminary plat does not include the proposed lot split, it is possible that the lot split may be included in the final plat. . Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commissian recomnnend approval of the plat request, P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley to the City Council. City staff will initiate the vacation request to vacate all easements after Planning Commission action. There are no recommended stipulations. Planning Commission Action The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request to the City Council. City Council Recammendation staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission action. 12D P.S. #87-06 Shorewood Plaza P�'GLIMIN/-ll2Y I�L1�T S,��Ol2C yt/ODl� 1�L�( ZA � - t � = i� i . . / / MM 1+� �{ �� � ' l� � W��r��.� y1 � _ ,, � � s ,s,�•,,r. /; � .u.: .------ ----r. _. � � ,,,, _ \ ;�' t�,; y �,•..�... = _�;•. ..« • . �S ; • , �� 'a ..� • 9 , ,� _ �( ''v% . � ..r • '�. , ' � � . ` : p.Jtte� ,� .:' �o , �- -- — -- • - -- - — 1 `-- . ��:/� \ �. _� �7i: � i � S� ti� � .'-/ • \ +4 + � ,• - , '�lI � � .; .� : , Y /7 il/`�/�y a4 ,4i • �� �� �� . , I . , j/.aj, \�.�� '``+ 4 / M1I ^+ ` _____�� /�ij/� , � ' � � �`�` ` 'r s%�' '/ !►i `� Z �' r/o� � / Lot � . . \ �n � l 276,�0!' d j � � � ' .i � .� / ;, � � � • c / �`+ `` �. � r ~ j , ' i • _ / ,,. . i ti i, . . i � II � � Z . ' J � �^ +,N � /,i.�� ` � 'L � f I I j ; .I� � � � ;; .,, �` � `f '' ` "°' j � ; � i _ S ts•y-� _ � ✓ !,µ � �7 �• ��t � a � � � � � � � � � � .� i : - �i: ae-r , ..s 1 . � � �t�. � . � � , R � � \ �Pi��-� •.t' � ; •� ' � , t , � ' � ! i -�7 � . T -` '_'�-.- -r,t.—_'- •_!�_�.M` �'� �,'.,�..w.�� �.. 1 ' ' �' y .. � • ._.__° . _ : II'� ;' f— .:. N .... �r. • `` � i �. , '; ; • : � ; i� : . r ...... ,f y�.'� '� 1. ' '� ��� . lJt � . _ . C ' +: � � `j.' � 'r-' `- - ',.....�` _' v � �� o t _ - I � ; '> 81--�_ -�! ' �;J � j , '' ' N �. =q °, �,. !i �- 3 ,,, �-= = ; � 'Z' . ; � � i �: , `' �, ' ;, .� ' / i k ,, f , • � 'L`-----=---_�. ! f � O � , R< i � ; ' i � + ` ;•_ ; ' _ �j~ r ` .. � I i � � ( . J iie .. �tt � � ' ' �. , . ' ��: 4� • i I � . . . .. . 5..., .. ..... �3� i . �• ` •� ' '. . I � � ' Sec 5 ' � . � 1^ �i �� _ ' -_ _ 1� .'r � - � .) i� � .. 7 � + �` '. � � , �-�y . L:. �, ; ,�' '....... � _.. .. _� �I .; _. L o ( i , • ' �, � - � , � - _ _�: _ �.- — - - -- / '` __... i i `.�-,�' r, ! _ � � i . , r ,y�. j , LO� �� i , �-I ` ' �� _ ` , !_ i ...� � �i.... ' �.�� ':� '..•. .: -.�... "�..�...�....- _'�+"� . S�e.� Y• • ����' '� � � �.-_.. �... � . .. � � ` _.�------ r _' �, 7171 — ` L.�..�.� ].�� h... t+ y � l MOO R E - a!? \ �� LAKE � �'"_-�---� ' __"�z. .:...., u;� 4.bi i2E � ,,��;�,�,,�,,. PLAT MAP P . S . �� 93-02 Shorewood Plaza Revised . , PRELIMINARY PLAT � SHOREWOOD � PLAtA REVtSEO • .. � . ; °�':�� °:�.�.a,...,,:�::� ��,::<.:�.��,�,� ,....��,....,....,�,�.�.. � ; n.t �t ef w M�r� Wvur o( Matlan Il�. tu+.��t N. �, ���wo�. m.a�. - � nr+ 4��. r� 1ua y.�r ' . �..t w.o.. u.N°a�� .a�w��u�ii e�iaw� in.r x�a�r e. ti.p• r •�•«y � ��. u.4�-� u�...� .. �Y1r��YY�fA� .wm:a. �••w ...�_.t�..aV.i948 ,� ,�� �. .� �..,u �,�.�,�. Q G,� ,. .m ,: �, �. .m ,. .� � <, a.,,,, �.. �.. ����---- ,�, ,. .�. ,: �.�. .. .. .� o. .� �.. �.� ., �...n...,. _ � .�. :, • `�..� �.� F; ,�'"ne�.". ,�`ri"�..�°`.w` wn � �.iw� a��n . �r�.i<. w.m� u w... m.a .iuw. ... as� �i �u� «..�. .. �� w e.u�.r � w i.� x avnmo .w. ... m r.�...a n�l��r ...�� r a.nw.a we roora �e. W� cl�ra u p`. �'. f. C:KE.4F 'I":.:lft4C.G: •wr�1w eon. mr� r��. r� u a ��LLr�ua m u� l�rl �I�t. . ll hcio�.! `w o<r�m� �mr.�u �narlrlwUw u e� N�YC M�w���w / ` .rtt•;�l . p�Ui\l ..- ^`t'!:.H�._:fM.1. .i�t I l Y �J u� t e� nw r ���r r.��W. /[i..ir�'!'. }(l:: :..VL �l'�7N � � f 1�_ ...�,. . . ��. ..,. �> �,,,,...,a.,. �. � / i — ...�� -r - �n mx .ia �a. ..��w .�wr. .�.�.r. .+ �.d.�. ..w.... - �.�. n- - u �� .b ,o ��..e. w....�..... v.m.... �`/ ou�.:.o-r n /� /-� _ - ...�. v - �e �ex .e. �_ .n.aw �u..r. �r.r. .r �.a.ac...w.... . . u....s •r - �f �ooi .w. e« luew eu.+r -�.teur www. 4tt7:tF:�:7 �:F:• 1� '.✓"� _ ,� ...�,. � .....�, a�.,a. � .b. ��. ����..�.-. O UTLOT B�7 .... ,. ,w.�.. \ � v ••� � " .' �..-M � .�.�....,, ., �, �.,. _- � i w ... �.I.. �H :.., r. x: �... �.:.:�.:: I / 4 Rp � ,. � , � �' u�� \\ k.e � w�� �{ ��`r�'��G./ \� /r �N� i � '��r,� �;� OUTLOT A •� �� d' � � � I � �oT . / +i • / / o W � �" • 9 r� F- •Gi � '� Mo .O � �'V�� � o:y �/ F� W < r: '' � ` I .NU O�E IqKE wES Uj OT C� •.,, ��,� � I�`� ��� J � Yt��11 L�r � T RerA� — �/ ��' / x. LOT 3� a =, _ � ` \4'"�� �^..., , B��CK s cENTeR ��= j� 1 �v , �'f . // �„ BLOCK 2 � � ``� ' � j� � � / '� x I ; , , � �, a� � , � /�. Q � b � � ,�� �' � �:/� . < ' 3 �� , o o : � /� . �� �; � �I ! � "s� / �i` � �. • I v r �i r p� _ � ; � ' It : , ,� � � MOORE LAKE EAST ! � f s � 't � �� r .� = a �. . � � �4 Y S ���,,��' i ; — —�.— — — — — Z �: . � .� . , � EAST OORE 1 � "�, K -'� - :� � r �`i ) . I� ul r A l . ���J � - -- � i ' ..e: i . ui:�:.r. i. ... � __�ii.�� �yT S= � / • ! !I, � •�Hr.:�.f:wren • a<q � G i � LOT 1. BLOCK �` n .--�"�'-�•- � W C ' ;. � �r ' _ �• < � o, "(� . � \ 3•I��f� �MOORE LAKE RAGQUET Q __ 1 }� U� I .� '. �J �S'� h ' ' �AR> >; , �� . I �WIM � 4!l�LTN CLUB � ' �� SURPLU> j I �� Y' � � / O 3 v � RETAIL °' t ' �' � ' I I�' cenTert � ° � l o ' O� �. LOT 2''' Q i i 1 � �� ' lW ! j' y I..v' lf/ / �.p�K3� � 'I ��. BLOCK 2 F�- L �r' �� � �Y'��,�,p� ' ` I � � � . . z � .��• �� � � I �^'f 2 U . 1'Nh�/ I' I�' �/� O I �� � ./ � ��—. ' ' pi '— ; wV��M�. .. I ..c�6 I,, •=•�� "1• ..�„ �lr. l::' .�.. I � 4..�.. ... L r? \ \ _ _ = w���+an� •t� . ;.�;:rcoxs � a.r.•.a 'i:f'Y ) ' ] U �/ � baen;:;5.��a I � / / ��--`7-j"-� ' F 4:Y . 1 �vcY � ra. va I .._�.. ...,_ � �f�vc i � �-� ..� �� . :.�vrrok� _�1 .-. .:._. .;' �/�°�� cv �c .s� � � � I - -'�v p"/ r .. � I .�w . �a ca.wr uan __ '�••%�[!`��ra�� — . 0 � Y'�� �� r .ku���L!::l �tl S --` o rlPi� � /(1 � J / I ,.`s^� �.. r I ! . 'I� '' .... .. . � "' _ I ��_. �" _ ���_�� J ♦ �nnrtr �rMnaw� -i" • • ... . . '_'_.:^� •" "—�' _� "' "_"'_�'��__ / _� � `Q - - - � ' '� l i h� d�i vidi -T�'onrevtS -- _��v�t-c M�QRE LAKE . . � .R..n.,o � sc.�c w ::.` �. •u.0 , � �wc.� . w c � -.- � W�ITMtY w ,l � _. _. o�� ..�.:..�..�. - . 1 � —.—. W tw�+�.�N -- — � �Mwr4( \N4 Ni�V\�Y 4%W.wT Y1N� I --"— � �I�G1/�l Y�a M�aMWI Mra • FJiNTO� AO)AL4lY �O ce�L. WM ' / H . nwa w.o.a�+.� _ I �12F � �, � ` � 1 :�` _ ==� OUT�OT A D _ , ;. _ I _ „ <. `. r�. ' . . � `` �J ' � ' � P.S. ��934,d2 �t � ��_ - / Shore,wfob�i P ised �_ � J � �S, .. � . ,; • � .t1 n �+. �D i �L�l>;. r.. � _� . . � `� � � l- � ' �_ Y � Q .. �'. �- `i / = J C r _ � ` " - ' O ` , .. _ ,✓, � D� . v�` _ �a"' ` � L ���i� rt � / . � � � �' � . �''' '� � � ��� 'r �'f / � � `l� � 1 ^ ' .. " ��_ � . {�— ��` O � . � < I` ��• ,O„// �' � ' .9 �7 ' \ / CS ��- �' �N �J � � � --� U �Q� � �{J � lr � ,, E �/ J o a K K R � :. 4 ;: - �, � �/ 5 S� l { l'T � l � /� f �V �� ` � g r 1 e%' ,�D 8 c.�P ; �r � , v � I _. .. ._., f / �l � � `�N r, / • � � �� d � � � � 1 / - / .. �,� 5 1 ,�/ _ ? �, � � � r ` � ,a, . � �:, r 1 .� D ^� - a / �p•/ I �� �; � '4- ' ` � : � • =l �� e �v � � �', ! ', � � /`� �/ , - i �(. � � =� O �'���9r � � : � � �a � ='' i / � / J v O ( `y `r l � i � �� �� ` •'' . 5� � J D � �- �� r , �. ' ._` � � ,a,�a�r � M0 ' �' c= ��! � � a C� � �- � _ � D J l��-'r Q' ` ' v ,Q :� - - o , �, �� � � ,� � , - , P-C�i �Fi % \� '^IO _ �a�� �� �! \ - - - � � o ��,� / �p � s i. .�o pQ �� / V � O Q� � £��s-�\�� _Q/ n� ��e' � � C- — - � , 0 v`^ (% � P � � /� � n//� � N � �`L G ;,. .� �1' ? cv 1 _� AY``i y\a� `/ �o P v no - -C� � Q4 N � � �' �� ��� �A`���'i n -; y -- � �'UT'1L.1T�( ,�- � ,� 5 e 0 .-. .r ��Q,� . , J M : .. . . _ - . . � . . . _ . L ` y , � i. ��' ^'_�' p � 4 -, o i i , ' •o � G.A 5C M EK'�' VT \1,1T1' �., % `-'ti, � .� •��_ �,o� . � � '° '° r�: Curvature Correction `1 � 12G „ „ ' ° � , � ' � � � /�� %�S� � � � � �. -''`- ,��` • . . � . � �� ;- i�-` �`; •- �' ., . , _ D I * �� r2, � /_/L v ��-T ' � "% ` � Ir�.:__r=�� D ��3/� ��I /'/►./P t% J P.S. ��93-02 I�uxly L. Kurth, Surveyor Shorewood Plaza Revised hlinnesota Registration No. 20270 Kurth Surveying, Inc. 4002 Jefferson St. N.E. Columbi.a Heig�ts, Minnesota 55421 (612) 788-9769 Fax (612) 788-7602 � rJ�. - _� '_-�,�_+,'It �`• . �' �• L I -•-.-- �� � , • ,-- i �Y .Y�J-'���1__ �, � � ; y�l � ' i.r- '�_ �.�'.. !' `. : � �- ' - - � S � • ' ` , � ' • � I • .� / +' � r— ' • // � _ q i » ''`O�OGO Q��f G����M �1ST11.1T.�o � EA15EMEPlY ``pn O� ��V ��� . , � QY�� _ a � � p'� J� 1� � %y� S�P �`.Y // � % `� � N J � / ¢ v G � i �a . ��,�s, .:. .�_ _ � �� / gv�, �o�� ��wcR) 'va � n / �� v �`1 ,�, `QR- S;' ^v', �� . t .;., � - .} D ��. ,, �I � • rJ � ° ,Q . x.. -�1 i _ ��,,d r`,, � / D �1'. // !, 1 Q ��. � ! -, � (l y `�. �/ �r � i� r n n D � ` c . _ v '.7 � I'' '�/ I"1' � �/ ,o � � ,�` _ �' / � � t� D d j; V� ,�� .,; �( y - 1 i�s_�� _ LOT 3 , BLOCK 2 12H uT��.��K ESM'T '-4 o R � � � z � � � J r � � � 3 D '� � i � � � � o� � d O. J � N , � y ' � J O � � Q �- W Curvature Correction � � � � , ii I� i� PRELIMINARY PLAT ��R,a w � SHOREWOOD � PLAZA REVISED .,� �.,�, °:; ��.:: d �.� �;r °..:R�.°��: ° '�.�:.:: �..,..., .K„� ,,. �. b...�,. �...�. o�..... �`�„°o�m.� x imu uu x� ��im �oo�na. mru.ni .a ....«y a �..a �m. w�.. ...c«� w�. �ia..r e. ��. aa.o: c....�.. .......�. ....w iu...�...�o.�. rr.�w�ua�n., i2. � �. �wa a: a�. .m >. w ox� ci o+��a ae.u. w. 1� l. �an I: au�lat 4�. ti o. w nqa.a au[laa �I nx.�m! 14w Iuutvn�� .��f ��1au< �. � ( (�1�rI'��1tw.��J+ �ian �1 � C'sr�e b.a �Jl� u w. 1M ��i.R n. t!1 ii �ui w�... w. w ma�r ae u. v�u a�wwm w.... w r.�wa w tl�r rra r,�`wa eme�a n. Il Ml u M Wa e1.��a b . •ws�lw e+�r.. d�aw�r s u� (wl at�t. u �,,.. «...��..b.4.w �..�« <..�w�m v a e..e.a a ..w�«. - / �;.i. ,. ua4ahwq.huaLUW. . ..H�::tY. {. u.�u ��• - f Imc .is IQ lucw. ��ew+li pqe..a. / ['•:)t��`• 30.•v :�.UL+1l'1�]N �..�. -.• . ie �� .w. �« ..�.w ew... �u,..r. .a i.+�,s. r�.00.... / �.....na �c - u �ma .na n �ex .a. v�r �e w� wvw+. �� C�:J'� :.C.'1' p yrnt'Y - 1a (mi.ls IQ rL�tw bW+�. wlwl. ha 1�Wr P�P+� �.�.. -r - �� �.o..e. �� �. u.... -..w. a..o.... ��uo:se:v+:aon . . .. �7f� ,� .,.d..,. � � �.�. a,�.�. ,� .�. � .�.«..�.�.... � OUTIOT� B�/ ,� �, , +� ... r �.� ..- �. �.,a.. � v � � r finc.or.x: I ` �.T�.::I �� 4yRD ual I .... n .., ., p�i:�. \ k.F • � P.S. �693-02 Shorewood Plaza Revised � .. . , ,_..�u,..�........,�w_T.. � w �i� r e.~�.�r �r �"R . r... s..rw�..�. .. s.� �w.e V. �94! � �T�L.P� w.�.• �...i.. aw i�u 1�wIY. 4 �^'�.. ��•�iu�� wu +-.w o. wu ur�nu 1` ` W h`. Kv:F. C.KF.�jh t':.:tHM.G: . n�crtx � —� ��. t •� � � ' // _�__ ' /:�� -- �,.,. 1 r: r � �..r, � . n,,.«-�, w r' / � � ° / ` .:,"�'./ �r � �.� OUTLOT A\� •� �� `na' ` � . ��� a j / �?' � j ' � }i `'* 1 '�C•VI'':. . ry� / yO . }" } l.:T.:.IY / 0..`� , � ' Z � � Mop .OV �.; ;1' W � , Rg �Ke T��T C� � �.,.,. ,;� / + . f� ,i J Lp wESr ._ ti �.' . � ^�� � 0 z a i �7 S Y � 7 � f- j � �e r /a Q F- � '� ' i u� Ic ' u; � �,���T\y� T � • B�OCK �� CENtER � ,� • , _\ ��, f � EAST�—� MppRE "K f , �..�.. .-- � �. P �-oT � . ui:�:.r-�-- • a�;c•�.�.wcen F'1.F'l.q LOT 1, BLOCK 1 SE.ARS suaPwe Re7At t. cen�eR �; ,i , I' � I. L::" �tii I �'r.:.� � :. :+'.1�1-!(1�t`i a�..�1`.'::i`F.J b_an::ts...�. I �.�.. ...r..vcv' r.�. sa � '. ' I --� --- .� � ,t, . � � .�� OT 3 , J ��: f' � �� � I� � �� ,��i BLOCK 2 � � �� � ' t� �� • ��� � '� " J ° / ., / O A.� j� /. `� Oy. V �.,��'_. / � �(�\ l� O �� � MOORE LAKE EAST �r�.Lf --�'— r'_ i Jji �� � � , �� �:� (.T� � ✓'�` % � �S � '�. �I � V �� �D�V�0.��� � .r•. / �o.� � ' � I ; � ��� � � ; . I '/ fF _� � ���'���J•O` / � '1 . ,—'� 'a„ ) y, ,� �s. � / / j `v ,,. � r� — �`� ��� , �� - -_--- _=.� MOORE LAKE � , �� : < � 'MOORE LAKE RAGQUET bWIM � HCALTH CLUB ? 3 . a' =' LOT 2 �,A ���,BLOCK 2 �� �_� . . ._v �;_��.�--._._ � I I F i.:: r , I `' �_ui•ra:�.�. .a«.u. w.. .e...` -- �sc�����c,�� --� '7 I .I:UN;S'::l btl / - � / -- ---- f - w r r �r 61l^MK �KI.LL ql iltT wu � I IMCM • �O �t(T —.— . wu��wv .aw�.n —. —. noww ..w.w � o�wac��oy - -.- . YMT6R MI4�1 • �� � � �Mw�i( �/M YT�VITY 4.4LHCMT l,M�. ---' �t�c.�u. Wa Mti�M�MI uua r� � KwGMTM AOlqGW� �O twL. CUM H . r/wa wvow�.�.� �I o, z� =I <' � I�l � 'W I 7 , Z � W II � Q K �•; z � ( � � . � ' 12�Bikeway/Walkway Easements P.S. ��93-02 Shorewood Plaza Revised . � PRELIMINARY PLAT . SHOREWOOD � PLAZA REVISED � .. ' . �. ���,a a � . . W l. �la1t 1: bt 1. �laA I: lu 1 tl l. �Idi L s0 At W 4�. C. sG �. W u . . ur O�M �peuOC ��mu CaRf. �ITrM�. �Y Iwtrwld�G vssY� W ���M �I Ya �Y ��( M� � T� � � t Owur N Malm �1. MW� M. YiP N. Mo�� 6iwl. �T� M��.i+� � Y�a Y'�Y� Iww�x�. I�W oM�tll N W01� 4N Y�Y{�iM lY YWtPoI�. oY�l! ��wll N �1 �� W y�rr lw V� �ri win� IY� Ptlw a� rt�1i M MM� 1[u► WY�� �. �f. � L r W�r r�� •. .m:a•••••••�••+•�•�w w,tw.� 9.R9i � �..a..�.. ��,..���,�.. ,�. �� �r,.� .�.,..�,: �,..��....a..��, �„�.�.w. ,�,..�,: �.�.. �.,........�..��., .._...�._�. �w �YU �M�tq(�fa�pNa�CLLtlr< �..�1�n W� 4. �^w'�'�..-CM"'^�"��.+.wH � fJr�w����� bT �w:.�e �c1°•s riwa u w. m.a uwrt w. �u uw �ar w. wn s�u �i �i .....�....�..a m�.ea s u. rw o� wmo� ruu .. u r..u.a � . w w IIb �r wcutl �omrt r. uAn u r W� c1.�r u K,�.� C:KK�K '1'2AHPGi: �w��lw aw� rru� v �W Wtti a �b 11W �Mt. . ll /n�we �w .t .rru� won .IY Wt�r arlo�lm� m N�re�G nf w✓w . / . fy \ W F b1� �l 1,. J'1' M m<4�MhN1wY�w�YUW. l:�T(..b�.::CM.I. :+�( �� �----_� [+.:iN'!'. SK'v:nVL•��'��N W�a •�• - f Iae[ Nb fa tuu�� �Wr1Y PVdd. / //—• Wrn T- t0 tmt �W /> W�llq 11YrI. �IWI. s� IMCi� M04+� � � Wra Y- Y Ima s0 i Ims �Ib Mwr W�sr I�F��. �`/ [1J'.'LSiI' b �r�w Y- f0 Imt .W �ar wl�tb V WI. W�rt. d INS4 NP�. /' ��fu�• MMwY1� • Wra T- lf Ima �16 Ix N[w �1w1 -��`V YP��. "i1!'JiLk:YYJU� {�l.i�'! � 1 �� r.m�. e..y u.�a a�.m. e. w w.ww w.w.... \ O UTLOT B ' J+• �' .• �, '"^ .� u�. .. o—r . m.,�.. � � VR / • , ,,,u.p s w �ino�,a.x: I 4..:.:ce:) \ 4y o� / • r �„I I .,., � ..} , `'/�••: . ��e.E •'r• V a / ` . c..l � / N s � � � � OUTLOT A .� � � 3 ;;���-K � ��� a I ! ` / `�T a •:C� �,� �d� p �,�, � . � ��r��� / ot� / ' y Z N � M�aRE �VT� �'* da ��^/ ' s��. v �! I ,o : lqy�e OT C} I � �� �/� . �.�.�r COT � EST RErAI •�/ ��' .c�' LOT 3. J Z� p ` ., " 4 e�OCK ��Nt�R v.. ! f• /��= BIOCK 2 F I 7 '"�.+. �^ " . • 'e. } °' `� j� � 2 r� 4�i r g Qa ` < � 4 � '� U;� � . �v �If si ' �'` s• ��� � I. J� ir L � 0� 2 ' d � �4/ MOORE LAKE EAST t S � o� '' 2 � I. � --- -----. _ ...�+'" / � EAST ----- I� � MOORE I � �,pKt y� J- ../f �.�.V w...w. . — I S 7 ��---- �' y Z i '1 �_-•- — ..� , t �.�, ,. �,:;<.K �.... ., . ' 1 li W � �.waco r�.:.zn 4 _. � . � �. � LOT 1, BIOCK 1 - -— W� � i� MOORE LAKE RAGQUET r r ;p �� I •z i Q o , � : �' � r � � �ARS }' , bW1M � �EALTN CLUB ' ✓1 I � �I O O 34RPLUO ; I. ; V RlTAIL ` 1 SY� � '? • '� l ceKTatt r � � o,j, O, � LOT 2': d I i Ir ' ,i K 3 ' ,'' tL .�; , ! ,. ..v' r �-�� a °I �' BLOCK 2 F• i �• �. �� �.k' � � , � � � . .. Z ' c: /; . O � I � r• �1 � a, O I � I rMh�/ �I .O ». i .� t:; . �.. I TY.:, r .. F % � �num..�aw.« r7, `W �� � �-�•_ I. :.J31TON.`� I ..1� �y � � `iSEn�'f:`...:Il '::Yi'.JC\' s I ` f L•^.T �i I � 1:.). 9d I '�.. �__ � J � / .j �� . :.iL�ITOK'.. —� . I.... .. _ / 1 �r.R �a.y�a �ww� wui. _ _ '�"b..SL`L�r��� _ I �� i • Q . kU,NiSt:A etl / . J 1 �• . .. ... . I ] - . '_'_:.:^--__ '. ' � l v.am waw..rt -c' ..• '_.�' "' "'�'___..�-. __ -' i-�� a�� ��\`� -- __ �_� . ` . MOORE LAKE ' • » Y Y 'P `T WYMK '/G�Lt W GCtT � �cwu � � wc.. . w .ac� —.— . vw���wv .awaw " _. _...a„� ...�.a..�t,� _ . 1 . —.— . w.�ew rr�.� ���� NNw.�I �/M YT�� ITY MttNLNr 1J1K --- � NK1AY Y�l M�IMWi llwl I •►.werte� w0)/.tw� ro cw�G. WM i �t 2J � . .,.. �.o.�.r � ' Water/Sewer/Drainage Easements CITY OF FRIDLEY p 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAT APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: Property Identification Number (PIN) Legal description: Lot Block TracdAddition Current zoning: � -�� Square footage/acreage Reason for plat: Have you operated a business in a ciry which required a business license? Yes No _�_ If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing} NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME _� ADDRESS _ �--- SIGNATURE DAYTIME PHONE DATE DAYTIME PHONE DATE Fee: $500.00 for 20 lots Petmit P.S. # `�J --d Z Application received by: Scheduled Planning Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: $ 15.00 for each additional lot Receipt # 12K � - - July 14,1993 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 612 490-2000 800 325-2055 ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION RE: Fridley, Minnesota Shorewood Replat East Moore Lake Drive SEH File No. 88057 Ms. Barbara Dacy, AICP Community Development Director City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ms.15acy: Thank you for sending a copy of the staff report and an agenda for the July 14th Planning Commission meeting. Unfortunately, we didn't receive our rnpy until July 13th and we cannot rearrange our schedules to be in attendance at the meeiing. We have been concerned about the replatting since June 10, 1991, when we received a mpy of City Attorney Newman's letter dated May 26,1989. This letter indicated that an error was made when SEH originally designed the alignment of Rice Creek Road. As our June 25, 1991, letter pointed out, we followed the original alignment in the redesign of Rice Creed Road. When the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Section would not accept that alignment, there were two alternates available to the City. One was to request a variance from the design requirements, and the second to modify the alignment to provide minimum curvature. The City, SEH and Suburban Engineering agreed to modify the alignment and replat at a March 29, 1988, meeting, and until June 10,1991, we were under the impression that the replatting had been completed. In addition to the replatting for the slight realignment of right-of-way to accommodate the road, there are numerous other corrections being made by the replatting. The cost allotment by Kurth Engineering in 1989 assigned a value of $600.00 to the road realignment, approximately 10% of the entire amount of work to be done. We are therefore somewhat concerned that the staff report indicates that the "request is in order to correct errors which occurred during the design of East Moore Lake Drive:' In reality, it is an accumulation of numerous problems and concerns relating to the plat which can best be accomplished through a replatting process. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN ST. CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADlSON, WI 12L July 14,1993 Page 2 We support the replatting and, on june 25, 1991, provided a check to reflect the total amount assigned to the realignment of Rice Creek Road, now known as East Moore Lake Drive. We feel that our exposure to this rnncern was created by the failure of Suburban Engineering to replat as agreed to in 1988. Recognizing the many pariies involved, the amount of time which would be spent in researching why the replat was not done in 1988 and our commitment to service, we provided the $600.00 check. We would request that your report to the City Council indicates that the replat is due to a culmination of several factors, or include this letter and the attached letters and notes. We believe they would help clarify the roles and responsibilities of the many parties involved in the need to replat. If you have any questions, or would like to discuss our concerns further, please feel free to call me at 490-2045. Sincerely, �2�� UG�rI !.�/� Glen Van Wormer Manager Transportation Department GVW:kam Enclosures c: John Flora, Director of Public Works, City of Fridley 12M CITY OF FRIDLEY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 14, 1993 _��_��_____�_____________________�__�_____________________��___,�� CALL TO ORDER• Chairperson Newman called the July 14, 1993, Pla ng Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL• Members Present: Dave Newman, Dave ndrick, Dean Saba, Diane Savage, B Sielaff, Connie Modig, LeRoy Oquist Members Absent: None Others Present: Mic le McPherson, Planning Assistant nt Fernelius, Housing Coordinator George Applebaum, Shorewood Plaza Partners Leonard Juster, rep. Northwest Racquet Club MOTIO�y Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the June 23, 93, Planning Commission minutes as written. T�FON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NSWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT. P.S. �93-02, BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: To replat property described as Lot l, Block 1, Shorewood Plaza, Lot 1, Block 2, Shorewood Plaza, Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Shorewood Plaza, Outlots A, B, C, and D, Shorewood Plaza, and that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southerly of Moore Lake Highlands 3rd Addition, northerly and westerly of Moore Lake Drive and easterly of State Trunk Highway 65. This property is generally located at the intersection of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive, between Highway 65 and Central Avenue. The subject parcels include the East and West Moore Lake Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet, Swim & Health Club, and Sears outlet. The purpose of this plat is to correct errors from the previous 1989 plat. No new development is proposed. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. 12N pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JIILY 14 1993 PAGE 2 UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE �OTION CARRIED AND THE PQBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the Shorewood Plaza Replat is to revise the Shorewood Plaza Plat which was approved by the City of Fridley in 1987. The properties involved are the old Shorewood Shopping Center, the East Moore Lake Commons Shopping Center, the Sears outlot building, the Moore Lake Racquet, Swim & Health Club, and Outlot B which is at the intersection of East Moore Lake Drive and 63rd Avenue. Ms. McPherson stated that during the replatting process, the City was also in the process of redesigning and reconstructing East Moore Lake Drive in order to accommodate the increased traf f ic from the proposed development. The Minnesota State,.Ai.d Department denied the City's original design; and after the plat was approved, the City had to redesign the road to meet the Minnesota State Aid Street (MSAS) Standards. As a result of the realignm�nt and the redesign of the road, additional right-of-way was needed. The City also has to return some right-of-way that had been dedicated. A Surveyor's Certificate was recorded after the plat had been recorded; however, this did not allow the City to record the required bikeway/walkway, street, drainage, and utility easements against the new plat. The original plat did not include the old Shorewood Shopping Center; however, that property is included in the revised plat request. Ms. McPherson stated that as part of the revised shorewood Pla2a Plat, several lots and blocks are being created by this plat request, including a lot line which appears to split the Racquet Club lot into portions. The purpose for the location of this lot line is that the property changes from Torrens property to Abstract property at that location, and separate lots must be created in order to allow the recording of the appropriate property titles. The lots as created do meet the minimum requirements of the C-3, General Shopping Center District, regulations. Ms. McPherson stated that due to the realignment of t�z roa� design, additional right-of-way needs to be dedicated in order to allow the street to exist within the appropriate right-of-way. The following road curvatures must be corrected: l. The north edge of East Moore Lake Drive in front of the old shopping center. 2. The south edge of East Moore Lake Drive in front of East Moore Lake Commons Ms. McPherson stated the bikeway/walkways easements which need to be recorded include easements for the existing bikeway/walkway along the south edge of East Moore Lake Drive, as well as an easement for future bikeway construction south along the service 120 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 14, 1993 PAGE 3 road adjacent to Sears Outlet and around the detention facilities of the Moore Lake Racquet, Swim & Health Club. Ms. McPherson stated there are street, drainage, and utility easements which were unable to be recorded against the original plat. The original Shorewood Plaza Plat had several dedicated utility easements. However, the utilities as constructed for the development do not fall within those originally dedicated easements. The previously dedicated easements will need to be vacated by a blanket vacation ordinance which will come before the Planning Commission in August and will be recorded prior to the City recording the revised plat. The easements depicted on the map entitled "Water, Sewer, Drainage Easements" must be dedicated in order to allow the City to access these utilities. Ms. McPherson stated that as a side item to this plat request is the proposed booster station that the City will construct as part of the joint powers agreement with the City of New Brighton to receive the water from the Twin City Army Ammunitions Plant. At the time the staff report was written, staff anticipated that the City would be acquiring the entire parcel and proposing a split. The City will be acquiring the parcel; however, they will not be pursuing a split of the property at this time. Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the plat request, P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley as proposed. Mr. Kondrick asked if the City anticipates any costs to be borne by property owners in the area other than the City of Fridley. Ms. McPherson stated that while the City of Fridley is shepherding this particular request through the process, it is somewhat of a joint application in which the City has come to an agreement with adjacent property owners to pay for the surveying costs. All the legal and title fees will be the responsibility of the adjacent property owners. The property owners are aware of this and are willing to correct the legal land problems. Mr. Leonard Juster stated a lot of errors were made when East Moore Lake Drive was designed. This proposal by the City to clear up the legal land problems is welcomed by the adjoining property owners, and all the costs will be covered by the adjoining property owners. Mr. George Applebaum stated he is in agreement with Mr. Juster's statement. MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 12P pLANNING COMMISSION M$ETING JIILY 14 1993 PAGE 4 MoTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to City Council approval of Preliminary Plat, P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley to replat property described as Lot 1, Block 1, Shorewood Plaza, Lot 1, Block 2, Shorewood Plaza, Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Shorewood Plaza, Outlots A, B, C, and D, Shorewood Plaza, and that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southerly of Moore Lake Highlands 3rd Addition, northerly and westerly of Moore Lake Drive and easterly of State Trunk Highway 65. This property is generally located at the intersection of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive, between Highway 65 and Central Avenue. The subject parcels include the East and West Moore Lake Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet, Swim & Health Club, and Sears Outlet. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. Chairperson Newman stated that the letter dated July 14, 1993, from Glen Van Wormer, Manager, Transportation Department, for SEH, should be included as part of the record. 2. RECEIVE JUNE 7 1993 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES: MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive th��June 7, 1993, Parks & Recreation Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN CLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. 3. MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kond 22, 1993, Appeals Commission minutes. / IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, MOTION CAR�tIED IINANIMOIISLY. / 4. RECr:lVr; 1nt�Y 10, COMMISSION MINUTES: , to receive the June NEWMAN DECLARED THE MoTION by Mr. Sielaff, econded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the May 18, 1993, Environmen� 1 Quality & Energy Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE V( MOTION CARRIED 5. ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE JIMOUSLY. 19 MOTION y Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms_ Modig, to receive the June 3, 19 3, Human Resources Commission minutes. A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE �N CARRIED UNANIMOOSLY. 12Q r � � I Community Development Department PLArrrr�rrG Drvisiorr City of Fridley DATE: September 9, 1993 TO: William Burns, City Manager �. �• FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SIIBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #93-18, by Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen, 5831 West Moore Lake Drive The Appeals Commission reviewed the attached variance request at its July 27, 1993, meeting. The request contains two variances: 1. 2. To reduce the side yard setback for an attached accessory structure from 5 feet to 2.3 feet To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3 feet The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the first part of the variance request. The Commission voted 2-1 to recommend approval of the second part of the variance request. As there was one dissenting vote by the Appeals Commission, the City Council is required to review the variance request. MM:ls M-93-483 '� REQUEST Permit Number Applicant Proposed Request Location SITE DATA Size Density Present Zoning Present Land Use(s) Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use(s) Utilities Park Dedication Watershed District ANALYSIS Financial lmplications Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental Considerations � RECOMMENDATION Staff Appeals Commission Planning Commission Author .�:y� STAFF REPORT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date July 27, 1993 Planning Commission Date City Council Date : September 13, 1993 VAR #9 3-18 Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen 'Ib redua� the side yard setback for an attached acoessozy structure frcHn 5 feet to 2.3 feet; and t-�o reduce the front yard setb,adc frcm 35 feet to 31.3 feet 5831 West Moore Lake Drive 10,200 square feet 1�1, Single Family Dwelling Residential R-1, Single FaQnily Dwelling, to the N, 5, & W; Nbore Lake totheE Residential � Approval ,� I� VAR �f 9:3-125 Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen �■ � M��1 LI 13B ZONING MAP !3, T. 30, R. 24 � ' FR/OL EY � 12 cq � 29 `i tl 2f 2S � 2i :z z/ VAR i�93-18 Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen TNIS 15 A COMPIIATiON OF RECORDS AS lHEY APPEAR IN iHE ANCKA COUNTY OfFKES AFFECTING 7NE AREA SNOWN. THIS DRAWING IS TO 6E USED ONLY FOR REFFRENCE PURPOSES AND THE COUN- 7Y IS NOT RESPONSIBIE fOR ANY W- ACCURACIES HERE/N GONTAlNED. 53923 ❑� �0 so; O� i � r ; �, / 1 , r � \ � /�p�'� , � 1 '� � 3 /Z i 4 / �i , I b ' 3 // � N. E. — - .� � j i o �/ 7 ��3� � / .. 2s L � . `3� � " / : f- : � 3e � :zas �' 19 Z � 2i L 2 L : 41 /, `, � . sa �) . 2Q .y.3 iI �' t9 2 .n � Y �13 D3 zv 'f zv s :� ' o z� �� z� � pa�� Y• 5 , 2G i! '� : ?G p f7) yi. ZJ Q 25 �i 6 . 3 � Lf JS ��q s 23 f . 25 r L ZS ;), i F • iiJi • tf 7 = W Zf ' 7 .(V ' 2f �• Z4 7 W ZE y ��� j3 Q / � PL y Z ZZ� � . 2-. 13 9 - Z3 J � Q 13 d 2z . 2L y K p2 .] : 2 / ' /C Y / . A� z.• . . 1: /O . � 1. �a i �i Ie� ,; 2�': i/ � 2oi ,� , 2o i: . � '� // , � � O` !1 /2 . i9 /z ,�' iz i1j .z ,p� iz � , �. I i! /� �. N �8 !3 _. �. iS /3 ii M �/3 fA 1' 1 O ' /1 :f t /7 /t i /7 /! � /7 i� '/7 /P � . �. /6 / / /S /s �J � � .. . �. /! /S ii /1 ` \ . r--39-�i�F �V�E--N� �; . .;� . _.< ...a. ` .. « � `n1jB � � M, c �'r�/2 %�> 3a-� i :�' , e)� s� �.• 3 i r� nJ c,• • • Pf 2 4 2 I ���/7 ,Z '�f�, 2 , �J� p 7 � 'e�.�\ x%�7 z ae, e; o\ cra ''.�,~4 59TH AVE. N.E. � �;r,z �''/6 Q� 3�+ O ��'�/f ,i y � � � . . , „ ; ' ac \ - ' � f� wn 41 ��`- I k. : r'l�: bI jr'� .(f: 3� c� � �� 4 �!� _ /� f' n.� � � 2 s �C . � 9 '+.. 7. . • j 5 'i 'i 'i Z, . � . '� ' z� $ � - .... n) 1� •: i �...'� , !"' i4 s ��' e /.s yt' S L'! z3 0 , I t^" :. . � : - ,,; 5 � �M,� �rl/3 6 l.r'� 3 ,�,i 1`� e�� L� J ei� . A)! ` tn ., ���8 � j� io �/i /Z ' 3 � `� 6 �'E, r s. � `.i 9 �: � � �z � ,r). iz �t' � � r,r� zo ; � �• �,y� � ,. „ , rW' .... � . � '' %'�� - B �% � 3 ��,. � �' ` �z • y MARIGO D � TERRACE �,Q �d ��/ �/t ie i3 � � y)3 .. � , , , ,�,� � , !f i J + �i � y U' � �6� �Y . /ar d ' `+. j«�... «�i sn rx�) �`) � An I �;a ' _ '',a �y'' �P/O /O'O�S i /L /J p . 4A; o� �l��l'�4 12 � /a f B �' .a'7 • .' /"' ' - �` .r . _ +� Z ` H' I � :. .... ..,, � «� : �� : 11 ` '\ ` �) �' w� ♦ 5 . �/ : Z . 1;'9 T t;7is _ , j (� ,..y1 � ,.� � 7 �9 �++J � , . ;n i�l (J dnJ ?h� ��a• 3�- F ' r I r. � � � 2 , i3� � 2 9 � f �� /B i7 Zo 2/ 22 23 C� � ,• � i)' !n) l3 �C . )/¢ 3W y�/2 ,. 3 t) . r� u ' a ZA +. . y��ir f iir -°— io� •'t''� 58TH �AVENUE �� !`• zs.' ' •• �; '`k h \ iv1.� s(� �.�n i�e � 5 ��, � � . �t� �y, F� :,o «r W>> �ryF: ..`' Ca) �Y�n.,"`. zc � H�- Z , �;'. � '4 /f • \ 9 b k.� -_G._�_ I. W..A` '� � - I' y� ;e ro)l ��- . •f, f 5 4 3 2 I Ns/ 2 3. �i . i7 �: ,j; /s.: .i s 'd `. i4n� ziq�2.�a ��YJ 4, 4 � o , . � �i, �� r: .i � z { r u; 'su w� an� �� A ;r, � 5 j! '. N. E. • = �e �� � � � REp ERED ... : � /3o-� y c B f /O // �Z 73 `!4� j 2i 23 ' �J : '..�r�y� .'/ `� /',:'. .e� " ` ;i;: --H"' a (a) y, w. a, n'� w � O ..i � •ag � - �LANO SURVEY :• /2° S(�> � /i oZ .- " �� ^� .a� Y 22 �„�, F . "��f ���Z %�'` '���° i�,00 s�.r , v�i • �HELENE PLACE ,., � N '. , 'b is: � ��}i0. al9 '�� .7 . ;5 p •i a7 �� � 'V) i M' v ,I�\ �%��ey1- ~?%` �B„ ✓'3 `3 ��..:n/9': ... ... . Y Q 9. 7 S 4 , N 4: �„vso Bk _ i, ; S' ir•J ' 3 f 2 . Y n)ZO gx� " Y ��,�2 �`�t ^�2° z� n,� . i.�w •. , ' � ... x - . . ... - n n .v '. rs-. ' _" . . . .:. ., � � "_'_'"' _' "' Q '_ , . � , .i ^, ' _'' ""_ ' ry' ,..+" 'S 13 24 i 14 � �` � ti�:.,:� ROLAND W. ANDERSON � "' � '�� .n: �--:; �a COUNiY SURYEYOR � w ����� � AYOKA CdlMIY, AIYINFSOIA weYJ-)fI . _ ..R,: _./.,�4� , 13c LOCATION MAP Staff Report VAR #93-18, 5831 West Moore Lake Drive, Mark & Laura Ingebrigtsen Page 1 A. STATED HARDSHIP: "Garage side variance: Need room to put double garage in. Garage front variance: Need room to put service door/entrance into garage." B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioners request that two variances be granted: 1. To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3 feet 2. To reduce the side yard setback from 5 feet to 2.3 feet The request is for Lot 8, Block l, Donnay's Lakeview Manor Addition, generally located at 5831 West Moore Lake Drive. Site Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit with a detached single car garage. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all adjacent properties. The property is located on Moore Lake which abuts the subject parcel to the east. AnalYsis Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(b) requires a side yard setback of 5 feet between an attached accessory building and a side property line. Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide space between individual structures to reduce the possibility of fire, to provide access to the rear yard for emergencies, and to limit the condition of crowding in the residential neighborhood. The petitioners are proposing to remove the existing single car garage and add on to the dwelling unit to the rear as well as constructing a two-car attached garage. The existing single car garage is currently located at the 2.3 foot setback requested by the petitioners. 13D Staff Report VAR #93-18, Page 2 3 5831 West Moore Lake Drive, Mark & Laura Ingebrigtsen The City Code permits expansion of existing single car garages to two car garages by allowing the reduction of the setback to 3 feet if the house adjacent to the expansion is located at least 10 feet from the lot line or a two car garage is located at least 5 feet from the lot line. While this request is slightly different, the impact to the code is the same. section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code requires a front yard setback of not less than 35 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off- street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. The petitioners are adding an additional 4 feet to the front of the proposed garage. This will permit installation of a service door in the garage. The service door is not required by Code. The added 4 feet will not adversely impact sight lines from adjacent properties. The overall lot coverage will also not be affected by the proposed addition. Should the Appeals Commission recommend approval of the request, two stipulations should be conditions of approval: 1. 2. The construction shall comply with the Uniform Building Code. The petitioners shall provide a hard surface driveway by July 1, 1994. Appeals Commission Action The Appeals Commission voted 2-1 to deny the variance request to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3 feet. The Commission voted unanimously to approve the variance request to reduce the side yard setback from 5 feet to 2.3 feet with the stipulations recommended by staff. Staff Update The petitioner requested information regarding 5741 and 5891 West Moore Lake Drive. The dwellings have similar characteristics to the proposed remodeling. No information regarding the front yard setbacks was available. Both garages were built as attached prior to 1966. 13E VAR 4t 9 3-18 Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen \ / � i �� \ � / \ \ � Ih�� / / / \ � � NE� � A�%� �-IDi,t � � � �,��N� � �� �_l.L� t`-�� � / � ���� � � � °� / \ � . ��� � � ��� , � w��� � � �r� `�r:-, vG \ � \ j � / V 13F � a ,,`�;6z � � z � �°- � V 4� 3-18 ? ark nd Laura In ebrigt ; , a- - � �:! --� ��i �, �' !j � ' — — � i g3 '� ��� � � ,, �� �� � lL � a, O �� I JO �� I �W �21 I � � � ( - t� , � v � � � � ?� z dn �� �� � ' '; ��� I 3 I 0 N � � � :�' ; � �; � , � " ��� •� r k � ' � � `" I Ol � ' ? � . _ ` _ I � �� � J� � � J � � i ` I w� ' � � ` , . I � �� c�.� — -� �- �� r�� � � � � v� ' L UJ J '�� : o� `� . `� �^ � ,� ' � l„a�Ndd � w ` �L� � � �,n ,�, a_� ,—� � d� _ _ N'�`° � . � z � �i � 1 , �� � o� `," � z i I -�v �� � 91 Cti 3__ �� W � � i �1 � --- . C�in `� �`-� I ' �..�^, a �� ^ v � ,� � I\ d- ? �>> � �; � � — _ __'A I '� � 4U ; _ i ( � � � . { L' : � f a u � � �. . il: I � .. . . .. . . . . � v . S ii i � .i �Ll'-'� r.' I A �- � i� �' i 1' i�� %II _�\ . � �' t q � ' ���--- N� .:;� \ s?��r�yo� �Si- � VI _ �. — --- o i �' � ' " — — - I a � � i o-� - , J , I OS � t -- � � � _ � ?- � . ;� � ` , � I �i' J ' � ^ ,;t - � - ''�' � � �--- -- — — — - ------- p +'4��"!'`�J' i r�� ' �V . � I�� ; ; � i , �� � -- J ��W ��] .l;l!i �.��:�r!'�JIV� q/ Z •• f Q �� � -- � � �, � � ' � � � � � �, � �� _. �, � ` � ;I �� � , }� �i I �- , 1 =� --� -i-. _ � �� �--_ � L r • J j c. � i '� � � 3 z. c+ - � -- J � :��,�� - 13G °�7 -�- � � � >Q u � , Z � � � 8 . � ! ;} :; ^ . • �_, .: ,�iJ ' Z 0 4c � `� Z � � � � 0 � w � .i , . il - . i. ' 13H �� Mar � �(I� _. = � �� �"� �� I�I � iiiu ,� . �is- �n La,�ura Ingebr ;" . / � � : `, � ' .\ J ' �� � I; � i `� O S t '' , � ! ' � � ' �� , � ' `d- i - �� 1 2 � t=- ,_ > ,� J W H z . � , �l- �' n � o� � �� � � � z :� �� �> > ,_ �� T U • ;_[ � C� � � gts� � �t _� � .�` Z _J tU :l �, �:_ u, � �. .� � C: �' �� Q ��' c � r �-1 J J �Q. � � N p. \ � 0 _ / t'-� ,' / • ,� � � �, -- -- \\ � "� I�I 131 �� \� i z O 1-- � � 11.] uJ 1� � � �Q, J VAR ��93-18 Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen CITY OF FRIDLEY 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 '� ��•� (612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 5�� 3% L�>- i%%vv r� 1 cc �-e- �r �r'� �ll� �/ /��i 7 SS'1�.jZ Property Identification Number (PIN) � � ' �U ` � `� ' / y - � ° � � Legal description: 5� E �-T t"�t �%� Ef� CC; �i c�F C�� TiFC.� 7� c� �%/ TL� Lot t`� Block / Tract/Addition ��nn Q y's L.�t i�e�•; r--� Nl qnor-- �ecic�� Current zoning: �e s,���,f'u � SquareJfootagelacreage �'� 1�1�1� ' �Yf'. �A iQ//C.e: zec� !'c:�.;� c. Pv cv � Grir4 � ,5� r Reason for variance and hardshin:c.,.v�� `.Y,,� v�„-, 4.�.� � Nee�,l rora, f�� ,�?�� .se�v�c� �.1,�r, Section of City Code: Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license? Yes No .�_ If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business? Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No _„�_ ,•�rv y FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title) (Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) NAME ..�.� � L<< vr-Ct �.� - E? br.���S ADDRESS S�' ��. � vor Lct�� /' �, �� �� n S S�F,3�. DA M HONE 3 7:y- !3 G d SIGNATURE .D�E " .3 � �� PETITIONER INFORMATION NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE YTIME PHONE DATE Fee: $100.00 $ 60.00 for residential properties Permit VAR #_ ��--�$ Re ipt #� �°l� Application received by: Scheduled Appeals Commission date: Scheduled City Council date: 13J IGt� 0 :�. It���c 0 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 27, 1993 PAG$ 7 Ms. Savage stated she agree . Moving the garage would not impact the adjacent neighbors. Th garage to the west appears to be at the same 17.5 foot setback. She stated she would be in favor of approving the variance. Ms. Beaulieu stated that s ce most of the garages in the neighborhood appear to be at he same setback, she could see no reason not to approve this vari nce. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by s. Beaulieu, to approve variance request, VAR #93-17, by Vern a d Deloris Bandel, per Section 205.07.03.D.2.(c).((3)) of the Fr'dley Zoning Code, to reduce the setback of an accessory structure facing the side street from 25 feet to 17.5 feet, to allow the r ocation of an existing garage in the rear yard, located on Lot 1 Block 4, Bonny Addition, the same being 5980 - 6th Street N.E., wi h the following stipulations: l. The petitioner shall provic�e a hard surface driveway by July 1, 1994. � 2. The petitioner shail replace� the existing curb cut and remove the existing driveway.\ IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. SAVAGE DECLARED THE 4. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE RE4UEST, VAR #93-18, BY MARK AND LAURA INGEBRIGTSEN: Per Section 205.07.03.D.(i) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3 feet; MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:05 P.M. Ms. McPherson stated the property is located on West Moore Lake Drive and abuts Moore Lake on the northeast. The property is zoned R-1, SingZe Family Dwelling, as are all adjacent properties. Ms. McPherson stated that located on the property is a single family dwelling as well as a detached single car garage. The existing garage is located at the 2.3 side yard setback. The petitioners are proposing an extensive addition to the existing single family dwelling. The petitioners are proposing to remove the existing garage and construct a new two-car garage attached to the dwelling unit, as well as a storage area to the rear of the garage. Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners are requesting a reduction in the front yard setback in order to provide room to install a required service entry door into the garage. They are also 13K APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JOLY 27, 1993 _ PAGE 8 requesting a reduction in the side yard setback. Typically, the Code allows existing single car garages to be expanded to within 3 feet of the lot line if the house adjacent to the expansion is at the 10 foot setback or the adjacent garage is at the 5. foot setback. While the existing single car garage is not originally attached to the dwelling unit, in spirit this is a very similar request in the fact that it would be attached and would be a two- car garage. Ms. McPherson stated the existing single car garage does not appear to have an adverse impact on the property to the south. The dwelling unit to the south is located 13 feet from the lot line; therefore, the setback between structures is actually greater than what is intended by the Code. The encroachment on the front wauld not adversely impact the adjacent property or any sight lines. The proposed additions to the garage and to the dwelling unit do not adversely impact the maximum lot coverage. Ms. McPherson stated that if the Commission approves this request, staff recommends the following two stipulations: 1. The construction shall comply with the Uniform Building Code. 2. The petitioners shall provide a hard surface driveway by July l, 1994. Dr. Vos asked if the garage service door can be in any location of the garage. Ms. McPherson stated that is her understanding. There is not much room for a service door on the south side of the garage; and due to the closeness of the garage to the lot line, no openings would be permitted in a fire-rated wall. Mr. Mark Ingebrigtsen stated that the houses in this area were built too far to one side of the lots, so this is not unique to his lot. He stated the neighbor to the south has no objection to the new garage cont.inuing to be at the 2.3 foot setback. Dr. Vos stated he has no objection to the side yard setback, as the 2.3 feet is existing. However, he does object to the encroachment into the front yard. He stated that in order to grant a variance, there must be a hardship; and if there is the possibility to place the service door in the rear of the garage, then there is no hardship for the sexvice door in the front. Mr. Ingebrigtsen stated that because the house was placed to far to the south on the lot, there is not enough room to have a double garage door and a service door facing the street. The purpose for the service door in the front as proposed is that they do not want all the traffic entering and exiting the front door to the dwelling unit. He stated there is a house to the north of them that has a service door in the front similar to what they are proposing. 13L APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 27, 1993 PAGB 9 Ms. McPherson stated she would have to verify the exact Building Code requirement with the Chief Building Official. She stated there is no code requirement dictating that the service door has to be in the front. Ms. Jeanne Ingebrigtsen, 5811 West Moore Lake Drive, stated that if the service door is placed in the rear of the garage, it would be difficult to get in and out of during the winter because it is a walkout. How are the children going to get to the service door during the winter with the snow and the sloping hill in the rear yard? There is only 2.3 feet to the lot line on one side of the house by the garage and 16 feet to the lot line on the opposite side of the house. Dr. Vos stated he can understand what the petitioners are saying, but that does not constitute a hardship. He stated his service door is in the rear of the garage; and because of a burglary, he has not opened it in 15 years. There are other ways to get into the garage besides the service door and that is through the garage door itself. He would vote in favor of the side yard variance but would vote against the front yard variance, because he did not see a need for it. MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOII3LY AND THE PIIBLIC SEARING CLOSED AT 8:30 P.M. Ms. Savage stated she did not have a problem with the front yard variance. She believed the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3 feet is still within the spirit of the code as it does- not adversely impact any neighboring sight lines. Ms. Beaulieu stated she would agree with Dr. Vos. She also did not object to the side yard variance to 2.3 feet, but she did not see a hardship for the front yard variance if, in fact, the service door can be placed in the rear of the garage. She, too, doss not use her service door anymore after a burglary. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend to City Council denial of variance request, VAR #93-18, by Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen, per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3 feet; to allow the construction of a double car garage on Lot 8, Block l, Donnay's Lakeview Manor Addition, the same being 5831 West Moore Lake Drive N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, VOS AND BEAIILIEO VOTING AYE, SAVAGE VOTING NAY, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 2-1. 13M APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. JULY 27, 1993 PAGE 10 MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend to City Councii approval of variance request, VAR #93-18, by Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen, per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(b) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the side yard setback from 5 feet to 2.3 feet, to allow the construction of a double car garage on Lot 8, Block 1, Donnay's Lakeview Manor Addition, the same being 5831 West Moore Lake Drive N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on August 16, 1993. She stated that before the Council meeting, she will check on the service door requirement and the location of the service door and research the location of the house with a similar garage and service door as mentioned by the petitioners. 5. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL ACTIONS: Ms. McPherson gave an update on past Planning Commission and City Council items. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to adjourn the meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Savage declared the motion carried and the July 27, 1993, Appeals Commission meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Res ectfully S bmitted, Ly e Saba Recording Secretary 13N �, � _ � J DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley September 9, 1993 William Burns, City Manager Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Variance Request, VAR #93-22, by Mark Blegen, 275 Ironton Street N.E. The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recoYnmend that the City Council deny the variance request. The petitianer is requesting a three-part variance: 1. 2. 3. To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet To reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet To allow reconstruction of a nonconforming use that is damaged to more than 500 of its fair market value The Commission directed the petitioner to review the site and determine if it is possible to relocate the dwelling to meet the setback requirements. The Commission recognized the existence of the creek running through the property and acknowledged that some type of variance request may be required by the petitioner. Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission action. MM:ls M-93-518 14 � � �'� 0 ST.�� �o � T � � Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date �lugust 31, 1993 Planning Commission Date City Council Date Septeniber 13, 1993 REQUEST Permit Number Applicant Proposed Request Location I SITE DATA I Size Densiry , Present Zoning � Present Land Use(s) Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use(s) Utilities Park Dedication Watershed District ANALYSIS Financial lmpiications Conformance to the Comprehensive Pfan Compatibility with Adjacent Zoning and Uses Environmental ! Considerations RECOMMENDATION Staff Appeals Commission Planning Commission Atithor �.yS VAR #93-22 Mark Blegen To reduce the fn�nt yard setbadc fran 35 feet to 8.2 feet; to reduoe.the side yard setback frcxn i0 feet to 9.8 feet 275 Ironton Street N.E. 24,431.25 square feet �l, Single Family Dwelling Residential P 1, Single Family Dwelling, on all sides Six Cities Denial I7enial `v�.h � �v�v nnHr �� � , 1 ` , ❑/ l9 ��� � �,� � " � �:..,.� QI . -�: : � , � ..:, � ..., � 9- !;}•�;. ii��/►i ����.- � F 7 ����,'i!1 ' � � �l.�ii `��� � � ' . r . + � . � tip 1 � + �+� �. _ . � , � C� \� � �-� ; w�_ - � ° �` � IK y .� � � �� ,� � � � �� � �.�s s tl �� � � ELY � 8 fi ` a��/7f1 6 / � �� �4' � � �- z � � � � i 14 • ''L"a,� ��'K�, \l�s.� k � � �c, t '� a � ! � 4� , ��:-' ` . :� � • �. � .�a?,s> `J) � ,: � �� �-.� �,,,� ``,� �,� `� ,_� �'�'� `� � �-��:��-���_��� ���Ra � 1 � �� . � � �.��-�� �`� `� � � � �y � � ,'`� � '-L: � Zi.- ? � t � � �� �• � iv � � � Q ` ��-�- ``� `� , �,;;� ``� � ,�:� � � � . �_ f .._� •�,: �:: � :::� . � r.-� ,, � � �' �� � � �.� �.f� �� � � �� `� � . � -� �. �' .� .� { � -.� �.,.' .� � "',� ' � � �� j ,.. -. � � .� "'�� �� „ � `�� r� +�.� . ,.'3 . � ' ��' � .� � M1' J ,� �� � 'i.' '' ,�,-'' � '� :� � �' � � � �'� � `� F� .�. � � ,�� � � ' ` � y � � -� �� � ; `,� (--� �., - � � � �� _ -� .�-�. . i'' .� '' c`:�, �� c.� - - r' � ^� ,...% r� � �1��'�"/�"��'�i�� . ��` � � .� � � � �: �� �1 PR __�___ L18ER7Y � 1� � �� • 'fj �t.•r: -. • 'l ,�1� � '� � 6 g -i • - . ♦ � � �, � � • • � � , � • • • . . , . . � 9 9 ♦ '� i • • . y�� eie �ti�\• � • • • �� . �''� '�'�, • "� s 1\ � � �S ./� ?!•il�' 1 �-� � • �� � Y 'f� • • • • • • • • •'� Z �....10 �.139 ���• � i • �d/Y•�, 2 14c ZONING MAP Staff Report VAR #93-21, 275 Ironton Street N.E., Mark Blegen Page 1 A. STATED HARDSHIP: "Fire damage repair" B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW: Request The petitioner requests three variances: 1. To reduae the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet 2. To reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet 3. To allow the reconstruction of a nonconforming struature that was damaged to more than 50 0 of its value due to fire The request is for 275 Ironton Street N.E. Site Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit and a detached two-car garage. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling, as are all surrounding properties. There is a creek located north of the dwell.ing unit which flows from the northeast to the southwest through the property. Analvsis The dwelling unit was damaged by fire in early August 1993, and the damage sustained exceeds 50% of the fair market value of the structure. Necessary repairs include removing all interior wallboard insulation, flooring, ceilings, etc. Some. of the structural support members may also need to be replaced leaving only the exterior shell of the dwelling. Front Yard Setback Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code requires a front yard setback of not less than 35 feet. Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off- street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building "line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard. The first variance requested by the petitioner is to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet. The dwelling 14D Staff Report VAR #93-21, 275 Ironton Street N.E., Mark Blegen Page 2 is currently located 8.2 feet from the north right-of-way line of Ironton Street. There is a 66 foot right-of-way located in front of the dwelling unit. The Public Works Department has indicated that they propose in 1994 to upgrade Ironton Street to 32 feet wide with concrete curb and gutter. There is adequate room within the existing right-of-way to accomplish this improvement. However, the dwelling unit is 8.2 feet from the right-of-way, the closest any dwelling unit is located to a public right-of-way. As the structure is severely damaged, this is an appropriate time for the petitioner to relocate the structure to meet the 35 foot front yard setback. The existing garage is located 34.7 feet from the property line; therefore, there is adequate room for off-street parking of vehicles. There may not be adequate room to relocate the structure at the 35 foot setback due to the location of the creek located in the rear yard. However, staff is unable to make that determination at this time due to the lack of adequate information. If there is not enough room, it would be appropriate for a reduced variance to be granted. The amount of variance requested should be minimized by the petitioner. The petitioner should submit a plan which would increase the front yard setback and yet accommodate adequate room from the creek. Side Yard Setback Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a� requires a side yard setback of 10 feet between any living area and side property line. Public purpose served b�r this requirement is to maintain a minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures and 15 feet between garages and living areas in adjacent structures to reduce the possibility of fire and to allow for aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential structures. The second variance request is to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet. This variance request is minimal and would not have an adverse impact to adjacent properties if it is granted. However, if the petitioner relocates the dwelling unit, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to meet the 10 foot side yard setback requirement as well. 14E Staff Report VAR #93-21, 275 Ironton Street N.E., Mark Blegen Page 3 If the Appeals Commission grants this portion of the variance request, it would be within the extent of similar variances previously granted. Structure Damaged More than 50% Section 205.04.03.B allows upgrading of a nonconforming structure to a safe condition, provided the necessary repairs do not exceed 50� of the fair market value of such structure. Public Purpose served by this requirement is to provide an opportunity, when nonconforming structures and uses are damaged more than 50%, for the City to bring them into compliance with current codes. The structure has been damaged to more than 50� of its value. Due to the extensive repair work required to reconstruct the dwelling, it is an appropriate time for the petitioner to bring the property into substantial conformance. The interior house systems will need to be completely replaced as well_as substantial portions of the roof system. In essence, the exterior siding will merely act as a shell. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the variance request to reconstruct the home at a nonconforming location. The intent of the 50� rule of the nonconforming structure regulations is to establish a point in time to correct non- conformities. Given the amount of structural damage which has occurred, it is appropriate for the City to require the petitioner to identify a house location which meets as many of the setbacks as possible. A front yard setback variance analysis should be conducted. ations, staff also recommends side yard setbacks as well. Appeals Commission Action may be necessary, but further Because of these consider- denial of the front yard and The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of the variance request to the City Council. The Commission recommended that the petitioners develop an alternative plan or provide further evidence that the structure cannot be relocated. City Council Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals Commission action. 14F /�/QRTN �/�6 aF" 7`N� SourNiv�'sr , QU�9RTE2 oF •7's,�E �Yo2THEAST QfJR2rE2 aF S�c. 3. No rz rN w Es r c o2,vE,e o f-nvE �/89 °,25'S8';E Sour.ywESr 4��2r�.e oF TNE N�RTNEqS7 QUqRTE2 OFSEC.3� ��0� T. 30� ,e. z4, RHO/l.4 Caurlry, /Y%/N/YESOTq. _ . m v � b W ti �Q titr �� � W 0 � � � �� a� Wa 2 �W � N We �� � � �M � � � �O � � rz.3 EXi17. � N GRa. w /1.� ,E�x�ss. � f/ousE d m �� �99°.ZD'45•• � � 75. DD sa9 °z3'zs"w �� � �XisT. CONG. CuRB •---- — �Ti2EET ,�X,s>. a.r ,aE.�M DESCRIPTION: That part of Northeast Qu 30, Range 2 described as Beginning atj Southwest Quarter; the� line of saia Northaast Qu feet; thence { west line o� the Northeas, extension oi Ironton Stre along said ea of 75.00 f@ Southwest Quarter; th west line to� Subject to 14G � SI1'E PLA� '� Halcanson Anderson �1� Assoc., Inc. �8���=��,�v�w�,���, 222 Mon�oe Strcet, Anoka, Mlmesota 55303 612//21•5860 NORTH L/NE OF TNE SouTNWCST QURRTCR OF THE NoRTNGqST GjUARTER aF SEe. 3. NoxrNwESr CoR.vEa Of 7HE ,yB9°,25 58�iE SoUTNWCST tAuq/tTER ef TNE > �/� NaZTNEaST O[iqRTE.� OFSE[.3 / SV(/ T 30� .Q. 24, RNOK�' CouKry � /YI/NNfSOTN. �� l � L v ���� � �L�; 3���a �����'��;, S�° 3"1'!z o Denotes �ron Monumenc 5cale / " : SO' � 290 p�� 3.2•33 Sec. T. R �O Z � M � . -� E��J ( �•�u t �� L��U �`�2 ti STi2EET f.r.s�: B r. B[�eM Certific�te of Survey FOR MARK BLE�EN DESCRZPTION: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence easterly along the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 75.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, to the easterly extension of the northerly line of Ironton Street N.E.; thence westerly, along said easterly extension, a distance of 75.00 feet to the west line of Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said west line to the point of beginning. Subject to easements of record, if any. 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct wpeMslon u�d that i am a duy Regis- tered lard Surveyor under tfie laws � the Swte of Mlnrxsoca. ,�J��%�i� /2263 8� 2/GT.O/ �.NO. Date �ob No. '� � nson „� An �Slnc. �,S��n.��,b �.,w��� 222 Monme Strcet Anolu.AVmewta 15303 6t2/127-5860 NORTN L/NE oF THE SoUTNWEST QURRTfR oF THE Ko2TNGAST f�UqIeTE2 oF Src. 3. /'�ORTNWESf CORNfR OP THE �yB9°25 58�.E SouTN++'CST �9uq2TER c✓TNE NOR7NE.vST OUqRTER OFSEC.3 T5.d0 � T, 30� ,Q. 24. 9NOKA CauKry M/NNCSO �'N. � � �.. 1 V► � C �� ^ (� 1� V�'1� 1 � �'L�`j- 3��1a ��`� °��'��;, 5�° 3�'lz 0 om«es �ron n1�,mer,c Scale / •• - SD' g� 290 p,8e 32•33 Sec L R � , � E��,J � ���� \� ��-�,'��12 ti STREET B r. Bcaiy Certificate of Survey FOR MARK BLEGEN DESCRIPTION: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence easterly alonq the north line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 75.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with the west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, to the easterly extension of the northerly line of Ironton Street N.E.; thence westerly, along said easterly extension, a distance of 75.00 feet to the west line of Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence northerly, along said west line to the point of beginninq. Subject to easements of record, if any. I hereby cerdfy that this w�vey, pian or report wu prepared by me or under my direct wpervision and that I am a duy Regis- tered land Surveyor under tfie laws of the State of Minnesoca. __���9� � /2263 ��,�9�93 2/GT.D/ � N` Date Job Na . CTTY OF F�tIDLCY G431 UNIV��iSITX AVENUE N.E. FRI�LEY, MN 55432 (G12) 571-3450 � . �'ii ,r - COIVIMUNIT'Y D�'VELOPMENT DEPARTM�NT VAI�I,A,NC� A.�'PLICA'r'ION FQR�VI �'�ZO �RTY INFO�.1ViATION - si�te plan required for submittal; see attached Address: 275 IRONTON STREET Property Identiflcation Number (PIN) R03 30 24 13 0004 00456937 C.Cgal deSCriptiOn:UNPLATTED CITY OF FRIDLEY, TH PT OF SWl/4 OF NE1/4 DES AS FOL �� �IOCk Tract/Addition BEG AT NW COR. Cacrent zoning: � Square footage/acreagc Rcason for variance and h�rdship: �'�RE DAMAGE REPAIR �� , Section of City Code: Havc yau operated a business in a city which 'required a business license? Yes No xx If yes, which city? If yes, what type of business7 Was that license ever dented or revoked? Xes No xx �'EE OWN .R IN +ORMA ION (as it appeaxs utt the pzoperty title) (Convact Purchasers: Fee Owne�rs must sign this fo�nm prior to procesSing) NAME BLEGEN, MARK ADDRESS 275•:.IRONTON STREET NORTHEAST MN 55432 SIGNATURE Y'�xME PHONS 786 1 � s 2 DATE ADDRES$ SZGNATURE DAYTIME PE�ONfi - —dATE Fee: � 100.00 $ 60.00 --- � for r�sidendal prr�perties � Permit VAR # GI. ? — . _ . � . Receipt # �'7 � Applicadon received by:• Scheduled Appeals Commission date: �l 3i %-� Scheduled Ci�ty Cvunctl date: _ _ _ 14J Mr. Kuechle agreed. He stated line with the hardship of requi addition over six inches. He wou ie overall impact is minimal in ing the petitioner to move the �d also vote for approval. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by request, VAR #93-21, by Diane Ha' �2�,(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, from 10 feet to 9.5 feet, to allow t on Lot 20 and the north 1/2 of L°t 1 the same being 6627 Anoka Street N. Dr. Vo�s, to approve varian�e .da, per Section 205.07.03.D. to reduce the side yard setback �e construct�aknGrove Additionn �\_ Block 2 , IIPON A VOICS VOTE, ALL VOTING 7 DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED iTNANIMO , VICE-CHAIRP8R80N RIIECHLE ;Y . 2. c:vN��u����..-- -- Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet; Per Section 205.07.03.D-(2)•�a) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet; Per Section 205.04.03.B of the Fridley Zoning Code to allow the construction of a nonconforming structure that was damaged more than 500 of its value due to fire damage, On that part of the Southwe Ra Que 24 r Anoka Countye Mi �n�� of Section 3, Township 30, g described as follows: Beginning at the northwest ence easterlylalong the nor�th line of the Northeast Quarter; th a distance of said Southwest Quarter of the No arallel4w th the west line of 75.00 feet; thence southerly, P to the of said Southwest Quarter of the Norlines of4 Ironton Street easterly extension of the northsaid easterly extension, a N.E.; thence westerly, along distance of 75.00 feet to t�ri nce northerly S�alo SSSa'�idawest of the Northeast Quarterinnin line to the point of beg g• Subject to easements of record, if any. The same being 275 Ironton Street N.E. seconded by Dr. Vos, to waive the reading of MOTIpN by Ms. Smith, ublic hearing. the public hearing notice and open the p- ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAZRPER30N RUECHLE UPON A VOICE VOTE, T�E p�BLIC gEp,gING OPEN AT 7:46 DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND p.M. 14K c'iraui....... _____—_ _ Ms. McPherson stated this property is located in the in t e ro ert is zoned R-1, Single Riverview Heights neighborhood. The p P y arcels. The Coon Family Dwelling, as are all surrounding p Rapids/Fridley border is directly to the north of the subject property. Ms. McPherson stated a single family dwelling unit and a two-car detached garage are located on the property. A creek runs through the property to the rear of the dwelling. Ms. McPherson stated the single famiiy dwelling was substantially fire in early August 1993. The Building Inspection damaged by air the damage will Department has determined that the cost to rep ge airs exceed 500 of the fairl �e� eo vWallboard hinsu atione• flooring, include removing all ort members. ceilings, and some of the structural supp two-car garage is Ms. McPherson stated the firs ee�rlaThe exi ting uce the front yar setback from 35 feet to 8.2 f the 35 foot requirement. set back at 32.7 feet, almost meeting Ironton Street has an appropriate width of 66 feet. Therefore, the ears to be set back an appropriate distance from the structure app h sical street and not from the street, but that is from the described. public right-of-way as legally anted. There is adequate.room Ms. McPherson stated a variance of 8.2 feet would be the m�he extreme front yard variance ever gr e and for off-street parking of vehicles 1 ect dwellinyeaPpeag tO be set dwellings on ei�oeriateesetbackssubj back at the app P there Ms. McPherson stated that based on a revised site sub t een the appears to be adequate room to relocate tears to be approximately existing location a hisewase not surveyedPby a surveyor so it may 77 feet. However, not be totally accurate. has been Ms. McPherson stated that sinc andh sinceult e edwelli q t ex re�e� variance granted by the City ro riate damaged more than 50% of its value, it would be app P, relocate the structure so that it conforms with the Zoning Code requirements. ired to Ms. McPherson stated staff re ea ria the peti i nerlbe requ re uce the front yard setback be deni irements. relocate the dwelling to conform with Zoning Code requ Ms. McPherson stated the second var his varianceerequesteislminimal setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet. T acent properties. However, and would not adversely llP ed to re locate the dwelling, it would if the petitioner is requ� be appropriate to relocate it to meet the 10 foot setback as wel 14L AYYl�[iLO •.v••.•�--- - as the front yard setback. However, if the Commission chooses o approve this variance, it would be within the extent of similar variances previously granted. Ms . McPherson stated the third variance request is to aliow -tir� u rading of a nonconforming structure to a safe condition, pg repairs to do not exceed 50� of the fair provided the necessary �lic purpose for this code market value of the structure. The p ro riate to requirement is to provide a time which would be aPP P brin nonconforming structures into conformancedam gea h itZwould g as t h e d w e l l i n g i s substantially l i a n c e. Code. Again, the structure in to com p be an appropriate time to bring Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Appeals Commission d denial of the variance request to reconstruct the home recommen location. at its nonconforming the Rice Creek Ms. Smith asked if there is any need for approval by Watershed District. Ms. McPherson stated that this property is within the Six Cities there are no zoning or setback Watershed District. At this time, The Engineering Department, requirements from the creek area•all watershed requests, did not which is responsible for reviewin To riate setback from the creek, make any comment regarding an app P or any protection for any impact to the dwelling unit by flooding, the creek itself. the house would Mr. Kuechle stated he would like to know how moving impact the petitioner. Mr. Mark Blegen stated that, economically, it impacts them negatively. They did not have a��lot of 1 o ket'Ceifn th Y have to they would have to take money out of p destroy the cement foundation and move th� tou�oveathe houseaback moving the house back, it might be alriespecially this year. 30 feet, because the creek does flood, asked if there are any other factors that would necessitate Dr. Vos ro ert line. keeping the house within 8 feet of the p P Y Mr. Blegen stated he did not think so. He stated he did not know e easement on his front yard. In looking why there is such a larg his tiouse is in down the street er�°ther houses.t The house to the west is in line line with all th with his. Dr. Vos asked that if the house was moved back, what would the petitioner do about the existing garage' Mr. Blegen stated that in order tfl �enand constructrahneweone.the lot, he might have to raze the garag � ►�t i Dr. Vos stated that the creek oV an f the house back on thellotashe If the City Council approves m 9 would like someone to determine can cto y H e did not want-the City and just how far back the house 9 to force the petitioners to move the house back into the flooding area. anded in 1994 as proposed Ms. Smith stated that if the str shel wo d be concerned about the by the Engineering Department, too close to the new street. house in its existing location being . Shauna Blegen stated that she did not have a problem with Ms �o�ed back on the lot, but someone needs to having the dwelling address the footage from the b ai o likeeto be able to atta b�� flood every spring. She would house to the existing garage. the house would erous for their small Ms. Blegen agreed that if the street is expande , be too close to the street and at lthelr financial situation after son. But, they are also looking losing everything in the fire. Leno stated he is Ms. Blegen's bre �e a n nconforming M r. S t a n l e y wa n t i n g t o c o r r o d d s h a p e d could understand the City odd with a quasi cul-de-sac at situation. One of the problems is that this is a ve lot, and the street itself is very along with the creek at the end of the street. These conditions, the back of the property, create � touthem if thel house has�toebe for the Blegens is the added �os this house might have moved. If the fire hadn't happened, ears. He asked that the continued at this setback for another 50 y Cit weigh all the factors and come up with the best decision for Y all parties involved. ublic MO_ by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the p hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRpERSON RUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND TAE PIIBLIC HEARING CIASED AT 8:10 P.M. r. Vos stated the petitioners would no of the house theThisaisnan D orit been a fire which destroyed of aFridley to make the structure opportunity for the City ortunity for the petitioner to use conforming, and it is also an oPP than it is now• He would suggest their property in a different way could rearrange that the petitioners give some ta� ge a d st� 11 be set back �o erty a new home to use the existing q from the front property line and 10 feet from the side p P line on the west side. 14N P►YY�AI,a ..�,,.,-a�...---- out a new plan. Dr. Vos stated he would recomms ns nde t�1 �o i y three varla�ed requests to gi v e t h e p e t i t� o n e He urged the petitioners to bo� the creek ha t t h e h o u s e i s p a on the lot a safe distance fr s. Smith stated that even though she could see a defi lacedaonsthe M e of the lot and how the house was p She in the odd shap rove the variance request as proposed. lot, she could not app would recommend denial of all three variances. etitioners, Mr. Kuechle stated it llossrfromlthe fires and becausepcke C�riythe both for the personal �oving the house ba asking them to add to the cost by ier in he believed the petitioners will be much happ other hand, est is denied and the house is moved five years if the variance requ back on the lot. seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend to City MO_ TIpN by Dr. Vos, est, VAR #93-22� bY I"�ark Blegen, Council denial of varian � o�he Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce per Section 205.07.03.D.( ) er Section the front yard setback from 35 feet t° Code, to reduce t he si de 205.07.03.D.(2)•(a) of the Fridley Zonian per Section 205.04.03.B yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet, o of its value of the Fridley Zoning Code to �a ed moree than 5 ruCtion of a nonconforming structure that was da g due to fire damage at 275 Ironton Street N.E. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RIIECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIT"IOUSLY- Council on Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to the City September 13, 1993- ADJOURNMENT• • seconded by Ms. Smith, to adjourn the meeting. MO_ by Dr. Vos, Vice-Chairperson Kuechle Upon a voice vote, all voting aYe� and the meeting adjourned declared the motion carried unanimously at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, �, �v*�/-'C �Ly � e Saba Recording 5ecretary 140 i _ � J DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley September 9, 1993 William Burns, City Manager �, �•� • Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Resolution Approving Extension of a Lot Split, L.S. #93-01, by Westminster Corporation on March 15, 1993, the City Council approved the lot split application for Westminster Corporation to construct Norwood Square, a 51 unit senior housing project. The subdivision ordinance requires the lot split to be recorded within 180 days. Westminster has requested a continuance for one year to allow them to complete the approval process with HUD (see attached letter) Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution as presented. BD/dn M-93-514 �V'�estminster Bui/ding Paruaershi�s fora Caring Community WESTMINSTER CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS *Joseph Errigo, President *Edward Driscoll, Chair *Albert Colianni *Anne Heegaar.� *Josephinc Rca�Taylor Patrick Comva�� Diana Markfort Mary Leintz Frank Sno�vdcn Jerry Madsen Rev. Kevin McDonough Ellen Brown *Executive Committee William Cosgriff �of Counsel) WESTMINSTEF MANAGEMENT CORPORATIOI� Joseph Errigo John Homer Susan Sands WESTMINSTER RESIDENT SER�'10ES CORPORATIOI� Joseph Errigo Richard McCarth�� Barbara Kilbounx September 3, 1993 Barbara Dacy, AICP Community Development Director Municipal Center 6431 University Avenue, N.E. Fridley, MN 5432 Re: Pdorwbod Square Senior Housing Dear Barbara: As we discussed, the above-captioned project is moving forward. We expect to receive HUD's conditional financing commitment shortly, and thus we have engaged the project architect to complete construction drawings and have directed our contractor to �obtain firm bids. We expect this to be accomplished during November 1993, at which time we will submit to HUD for firm commitment (the final stage in HUD's funding process). Once HUD issues its firm commitment, we can proceed to closing. Given the backlog and understaffing at HUD, our ontimistic time frame for closing is spring of 1994; however, it is quite possible that closing could occur later than that. Given the delays we have experienced in dealing with HUD, we request that the city extend for one year (to September 1994) the deadline for recording the deed on the lot that was split off in contemplation of this project. Thank you for your cooperation on this matter. Sin _ � ose L. Holmber Vice President of Operations 328 West Kello� Boulevard • St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 •(612)��1Z50 • Fax (612) 291-1003 /� AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFEIRMATIVE ACI'ION ORGANIZATION RESOLUTION NO. - 1993 RESOLUTION EXTENDING APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.S. #93-01, TO CREATE TWO SEPARATE PARCELS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF 61ST AVENUE AND WEST OF 5TH 5TREET WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at their March 15, 1993 meeting; and the Planning Commission stipulation attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, such approval was to create two separate parcels from the Norwood Addition to Fridley Park plat and Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 59, to be described as follows: Parcel A: Lots one to sixteen (1-16), inclusive in Block One (1); and Lots one and thirty, in Block Two (2), Norwood Addition to Fridley Park, according to the duly recorded plat thereof. That part of vacated Kent St. (now known as 62nd Ave.), dedicated in the plat of "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lying between the northerly extensions of the east and west lines of Block 2, said plat. That part of vacated 5th Ave. (now known as 4th Street), dedicated in the plat of "Norwood Additian to Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 30, Block 2, said plat, and the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 16, Block 1, said plat. That part of the vacated alley in Block 1, "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the north line of Lot l, Block 1 and the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 8, Block 1. That part of the vacated alley in Block 2, "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 1, said Block 2, and the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 1, said Block 2. Parcel B: All of Lots 2 through 29, inclusive in Block Two (2), "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", according to the duly recorded plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota. That part of vacated 5th Ave. (now known as 4th Street), dedicated in the plat of "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 16, Block 2, said plat, and the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 29, Block 2, said plat. 15B Resolution No. - 1993 Page 2 That part of the vacated alley in Block 2, "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 2, Block 2 and the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 15, said Block 2. Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 59, Anoka County, Minnesota. Except the South 180 feet of the West 183 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota. And except that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said-Section 14, described as commencing at the Southwest corner thereof; thence Northerly along the West line thereof 30 feet; thence Easterly parallel with the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14, a distance of 127.22 feet; thence Northeasterly on a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 20 feet, a distance of 31.22 feet; thence Northerly, tangent left having a radius of 20 feet, a distance of 31.22 feet; thence Northerly, tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 100.96 feet; thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the left, having a radius of 45 feet, a distance of 31.99 feet to the North line of the South 180 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14, said point being the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing Northwesterly along the last described curve, a distance of 16.7 feet; thence Northwesterly tangent to the last described curve 56.94 feet; thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 175 feet, a distance of 53.71 feet to its intersection with a line parallel with and 30 feet East of the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14; thence Southerly along said line parallel with and 30 feet East of the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, to the North line of the South 180 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Easterly along the North line of said South 180 feet to the actual point of beginning. And except that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14, described as commencing at the Southwest corner thereof; thence Northerly along the West line thereof 30 feet; thence Easterly parallel with the South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14, a distance of 127.22 feet; thence Northeasterly on a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 20 feet, a distance of 31.22 feet; thence Northerly tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 100.96 feet; thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 45 feet, a distance of 48.69 feet; thence Northwesterly tangent to the last. described curve 56.94 feet; thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 175 ieet, a distance of 53.71 feet to the East line of the West 30 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14, said point of intersection being the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing 15C Resolution No. - 1993 Page 3 Northwesterly along said curve having a radius of 175 feet, a distance of 23 feet to the East line of the West 15 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Southerly along said East line to the intersection with the North line of the South 30 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Easterly along a line parallel with and 30 feet North of the South line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 15 feet to the East line of the West 30 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Northerly along the East line of the West 30 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to the actual point of beginning. Subject to road right- of-ways on 61st Avenue N.E. and the East frontage road of State Highway No. 47 (University Avenue). WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey from the owner; and WHEREAS, such approval will create two separate parcels from the Norwood Addition to Fridley Park plat and Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 59; and WHEREAS, the petitioner, Westminster Corporation, has requested an extension for one year to September 1, 1994 to obtain project approval from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County by 5eptember 1, 1994 or else such approval shall be null and void. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1993. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 15D WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR � EXHIBIT A Resolution No. - 1993 Page 4 l. The petitioner shall execute and record an open air easement to provide an additional 4, 830 square feet of land area on the St. William's parcel. The proposed easement language shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution of the easement. The easement shall not be used to calculate setbacks or lot area calculations on the St. William's property. If necessary, a consent by a mortgage holder shall also be submitted. 15E _- __ _ __ _ _ _ _. ___ _ _ . r � � -- � DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley September 9, 1993 �. William Burns, City Manager �' � Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Approval of Relocation Consultant Contract with Professional Redevelopment Resources On August 3, 1992, the City Council authorized condemnation of the Nelson property at 6070 and 6074 Central Avenue. As part,of the condemnation proceedings, a relocation consultant must be hired by the City to determine appropriate relocation benefits for the tenants of the two single family homes on the property. Kirk Schnitker, of Professional Redevelopment Resources, assisted the City with the last single family home acquisition and relocation for the Riverview Heights project. We found his work to be outstanding and recommend him again on this project. The total contract cost is $1,690, or $845 for each home. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the contract as presented. BD/dn M-93-515 This agreement, entered into as the 13th day of September, 1993 by the City of Fridley (hereinafter referred to as Contractor), and Professional Redevelopment Resources, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Consultant). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Contractor desires the provision of certain technical assistance and other services pursuant to the terms of Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.50 et. seq., and/or the Uniform Relocation and Real Properties Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, whichever is applicable, in connection with the implementation of the Moore Lake Beach project as heretofore adopted by the Contractor, and WHEREAS, the Contractor desires that the Consultant provide such assistance and services to provide for relocation assistance, in this project, and WHEREAS, the Contractor proposes to acquire certain real property and desires that the Consultant furnish the Contractor certain services with respect to such property, and the consultant represents that the consultant is fully qualified to perform such services and will furnish such services personally. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: Consultant agrees to provide services set forth below under Section I entitled "Residential Relocation Service (Scope of Services)" and the Contractor agrees to pay for such services in the amount and manner set forth below under Section II entitled "Compensation", and Section III entitled "Method of Payment of Fees". SECTION I: Residential Relocation Services (Scflpe of ServicesZ A. The Consultant will distribute an information booklet on the residential relocation assistance and all appropriate forms and data to each residential occupant expected to be displaced. The Consultant will: l. Obtain a signed receipt for the informational statement provided by the Contractor in accordance with the applicable regulations. 2. Explain the residential relocation program and the displacee's responsibility to receive benefits. 3. Explain how to receive various kinds of assistance in finding new locations. 4. Explain the residential relocation needs and prepare Family Record Card. 5. Provide Notices of Displacement within 30 days after initiation of negotiations. 16A Agreement Page 2 6. Analyze existing data to determine eligibility of the displacee's relocation expenses for compensation. 7. Interview residential displacee to determine housing needs. 8. Identify and determine the cost of comparable replacement housing. 9. Provide referrals to replacement housing units. 10. Provide other social services, on an as-needed basis. 11. Assist the displacee in determining the more advantageous payment alternative to claim for moving expenses and provide further instructions on how to proceed. 12. Issue 90 day notiae as necessitated after referral to replacement housing is made. 13. Determine if selected replacement location is decent, safe, and sanitary. 14. Assist eligible residential occupant in preparation of claim for Replacement Housing Payment for 180 day homeowners. 15. Assist eligible residential occupant in preparation of claim for Rental Assistance Payment and/or pown Payment Assistance for 90 day occupants. 16. Assemble the appropriate claim forms and documentation for signature and submission for approval. 17. Transmit to the Contractor the final claim for its action. The claim will include the amount of payment to be made and any special considerations. B. The Consultant does not assume the responsibility for: * Preparation of Status Reports * Housing of Last Resort Services * Accounting and Record Keeping (except as related to specific claim) * Payment for direct loss appraisals, property analyses, and moving cost estimates and/or bids � SECTION II: COMPENSATION The Consultant shall provide all necessary tenant relocation services invoiving the two subject rental properties. The total that shall be charged for subject services shall be $845.00 for each relocation for a total not to exceed $1,690.00. . : Agreement Page 3 SECTION III: METHOD OF PAYMENT OF FEES Monthly re�uisitions may be made subject to receipt of a statement from the Consultant specifying that it has performed the work in conformance with the Contract and that it is entitled to receive the amount requisitioned under the terms of the Contract. The Contractor will make payment on such invoices upon receipt, provided, however, that payment shall not be made for any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work until same is remedied by Consultant without additional cost to the Contractor. SECTION IV: LIABILITIES A. The City agrees to hold the consultant harmless from any and all claims or causes of action arising from the City's performance of this agreement. B. The Consultant agrees to hold the City, its agents and employees harmless from any and all claims or causes of action arising from the performance of the services identified as the Consultant�s responsibility in this agreement including but not limited to consultant error and services that consultant completes for the City as a result of any changes made in the contracted services as allowed by Section VII of this agreement. This clause shall not be construed to limit any legal remedies the City may pursue in the event that the consultant fails to fulfill the Consultant's obligations pursuant to this agreement. SECTION V: PROPERTY COVERED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT 6070 Central Avenue N.E. and 6074 Central Avenue N.E., both in Fridley, Minnesota. These are tenant occupied properties. SECTION VI: CONTRACT PERIOD The Consultant shall commence performance of this contract upon Notice to Proceed by the City Manager or upon execution of this Contract and shall complete performance of this contract no later than sixty (60) days after the last occupant of real property has vacated the proj ect area and all appropriate documentation has been provided by the displacee to the Consultant. SECTION VII: CHANGES IN CONTRACT The Contractor or the Consultant may request changes in the scope of the services to be provided. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by and between the Contractor and the Consultant shall be incorporated in written amendment io this Contract. SECTION VIII: ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION A. Interest to Certain Federal Officials No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States, 1 sC+ Agreement Page 4 and no other Federal Official, shall be admitted to any share or part of this Contract or to any benefit from this Contract. B. Covenant Against Contingent Fees The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or persons other than bonafide employees or technical subcontractors working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bonafide employee or technical subcontractor working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the Contractor shall have the right to annul this Contract without liability. C. Termination of Contract The Contractor or the Consultant may terminate this Contract or renegotiate this Contract upon thirty (30) days written notice. In the event of termination, all property and finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, and reports purchased or prepared by the consultant under this Contract shall be disposed of according to the Contractor directives and the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for any unreimbursed expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred in satisfactory performance of this Contract. D. Extent of Contract This Contract represents the entire and integrated agreement between the Consultant and Contractor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral. This contract may be amended only by written instrument signed by both Consultant and Contractor. E. Personnel The Consultant represents that it has or will secure all personnel required in performing the services under this Contract as provided above. All of the services herein will be performed by the Consultant or under its supervision, and all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under State and local law to perform such services. F. Non-Discrimination The Consultant will not discriminate against any employee, or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, sex, national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status in regard to public assistance, or age. The Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during their employment, without regard to race, creed, color, sex, � . � Agreement Page 5 G. H. national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status in regard to public assistance, or age. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the State setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. In addition, the Consultant will in all solicitations and advertisements placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, creed, color, sex, national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status in regard to public assistance, or age. Assignment The Consultant shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without prior written consent of the City. Special Administrative Provisions All records pertaining to this Agreement shall be maintained by the Consultant for a period of at least three (3) years after the creation of such records. Ih` WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the Consultant have executed the Contract on or as the date first written above. � � B�- : Professional 2300 Central Minneapolis, Phone: (612) Redevelopment Avenue N.E. MN 789-5151 Mayor William J. Nee City of Fridley William W. Burns City Manager City of Fridley Resources Inc. 16E Date Date Date �� 0 RE �t K � r / ' (D I O 2 r.�. tty%-u4 Gary Lenar.t � • � • i . � r 7 1 sF ZONING NAAP Di a n '1 RO[3ERT A. GU71' 13ERNARD E. STL'fFEN RlCHARD A: ML=RRILI DARRELL A. JENSEN JEFFREY S. JOHNSON RUSSELL H. CRO�C'DER JON P. ERICKSON LAWRENCE R. JOHNSON UAVID A. COSSI TNOMAS I'. b.tALONE MICHAEL F. HUhLEY SHARON L. HALL VIRGIL C. HERRICK HERMAN L. TALLE Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. ATTORI�EYS AT [.A�Y� 400 �orthtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids $oulevard Minneapolis, MN 55433 (612) 780-8�00 FAX (612) 780-1777 Writer's Direct Line: (612) 783-5124 July 28, 1993 Richard E. Berger Attorney at Law 240 Chester Street Suite 8 St. Paul, MN 55107 RE: Peter A. Berger and Julie A. Berger, his wife 6070 Central Avenue Northeast Fridley, MN 55432 Petition for Condemnation in the Anoka County District Court File No. C5-92-9097 Dear Mr. Berger: JUL � u (�.7J I CHARL ES MHSEYI:ORA WILLIAM M. HANSEN DANIEL D. GANTER, JR. BEVERLY K. DODGE GREGG V. HERRICK JAMES A HOEFT JOAN M. QUADE SCOTT M. LEPAK S7EVEN L. MACI:EY DAViD M. WEIGEL ROBERT C. HYNES 1935-1993 Your letter of July 16, 1993 addressed to William W. Burns, City Manager, has been referred to me. I have reviewed your letter and the request regarding relocatiorz benefits. I find that your request is consistent with Minnesota Law and I have asked that the City Staff appoint a relocation specialist to work with Peter A. and Julie A. Berger. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, , � �~. �^ �� ;`_� Virgil C. Herrick vCH:jjh � cc: William W. Burns A� ��ual j�p��c Emplocrr l RICHARD E. BERGER ATTORNEY AT LAW 2a0 CHESTER STREET SUITE 8 ST. PAUL, MN 55107 (6t2�291-2902 July 16, 1993 City of Fridley Fridley Municipal Center 6431 University Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 � u � 19 19�3 Re: Peter A. Berger and Julie A. Berger, his wife 6070 Central Ave. N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Petition for Condemnation in the Anoka County District Court File No. C5-92-9097 Atten: William W. Burns City Manager Gentlemen: I represent Peter A. Berger and Julie A. Berger, his wife, who are tenants occupying the above property. They were tenants of said property prior to and when the condemnation proceedings were commenced by the City of Fridly under the above captioned file number. The purpose of this letter is to request that you provide Peter A. Berger and Julie A. Berger all relocation benefits to which they are entitled under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117. As provided by law, please provide them with relocation assistance advisory services. They are in immediate need of relocating in a comparable replacement dwelling in the project area. They wish to apply their cash benefit, to which they are presently entitled in sum of $5,250.00 for payment of rent up to 42 months, to apply as a down payment and for incidental costs for the purchase of a decent, safe and sanitary replac�ment dwelling. Please undertaking replacement REB/r acknowledge receipt of this letter and confirm your to assist my clients in relocating in a comparable dwelling they could purchase in the project area. CC: Peter A. Berger and . Julie A. Berger 16H ncerely, 1��� ��� � Richard E. Berger Attorney at Law r _ � . Community Development Department PLANIVING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 9, 1993 TO: William Burns, City Manager !I��� • � FROM: SU&TECT: Introduction Attached are properties. obtained for City. Historv Barbara Dac�, Community Development Director Steven Barg, Pianning Assistant License Applications for Residential Rental Properties at 541 - 53 1/2 Avenue N.E. and 4042 Main Street N.E. rental license applications for the above-referenced Fridley City Code 220 requires that licenses be operation of all residential rental property in the Durinq 1990, staff discovered that these properties had each been previously issued licenses for two rental units. However, both sites are located in R-1 zoning districts, where two-family dwellings are not permitted. On May 6, 1991, the City Council considered, but did not approve, an ordinance amendment regarding the mother-in-law apartment issue. At that time, it was determined that those in violation of the current ordinance would be given three years to bring their properties into compliance. During the past two years, the City Council has issued annual rental licenses for these locations, and. staff has included letters with the licenses reminding the property owners of the need to convert to single family dwellings by May 6, 1994. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve these two rental licenses only through May 6, 1994. Since this covers only eight months, the City would refund one-third ($8.00) of the rental license fees received. Staff has sent written notices to the property owners (copies attached) of this recommendation and the City Council consideration at its September 13, 1993 meeting. SB/dn M-93-516 r �.zg�5 City of Fridley� Minnesoea c/o Fridiey Fire Dept. 6431 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 (612)572-3612 LICENSE APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY TO TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA: The undersigned hereby makes application to license a residential dwellin� ii� accorclance wit6 Chapter 220 of the City Code of �'ridley. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Builciin Address: 541 53 1/2 Avenue IVE No. of Units: 2 Lic. Fee: 24.00 O�vncr's Name: Tom Olin Phone #: 571-5833 Owner's Address: - =�36-�-ivers-� e-�i�a -1�IE_______. City State Zip:---F�i�Iey; ��4�---- �.}t�..��i�y:+�yp,�'r� �3-y�;£y=.���p�y.{�ayf�s���a�}.a{(� liA�,�p��}-�1 ��7:`��.��� rom owner (�YL: i.wlf� i �'�!'14.tirli iM! I�isw.Y� a•'J1�.iT��F:��� Namc: %�! � Phone #: �,: ���-� , i���..�i�Y V ����' � ��3� �ac�� �. _� :_ r Address ;'��:��'� �•i,# ��s.��s� City Sta tti i)}i y(jt ! s( tt ( fiJt3il}t}flifFtil/Sf3311/3�1i1��14flliil��itllfl�lE CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that no order of the City to repair, correct or improve any part of this building or any d�velling unit therein or pertaining to the operation thereof has been issued, or is presently outstanding wl�icl� has not been fully complied with, to the complete satisfaction of any and all inspection officers of the City, to the best of my knowledge, except as follows: ! Si�r►ature: � ���-�/L- �Z ` �4 �--�_ LICENSE FEE No. of Rental Units Fee PLEASE NOTE IF OVER 12 UNITS: 1 �12.00 "Section 220.09 requires owners of buildings with 2 $24.00 more than 12 units to contract for recycling services. 3-7 �36.00 Please attach a copy of your contraet for recyeling 8-12 $49.00 services to this application. Failure to do this may Over 12 $49.00 +$2 for each unit over 12. result in the denial of this application." Please r�ote: Section 11.11: The penalty for late payment of all license fees as showin in Section 11.10 of the (:it�� Code shall be 25% of the amount of the fee if received from 1 to 7 days late. If the payment is recei��ed more than 7 days after it is due, the penalty shall be 50% of the fee. �x*�*��x�x��x��x��x�x�x�xx��xx�*�x�x�x*�x�x�x**x��x�xx�x��x�x�x�x��x�x��x�*x��*x���x��x*x�x�x���xx��x�*x�x��:�:****�:*******�x*�*�**�x�x�� For City Use Only: dpproved Denied Date Authorized Signature Zoni ri ; Fire Dep� c;�y co,,,���r 17A � _ Cl� �F FRiDLEY FRtDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E_ FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(6�21 57 1-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 Septembex 2, 1993 Zbm Olin 25820 University Avenue N.W. Isanti, Mtd 55040 De,ar Mr. Olin: 'Ihe City of PYidley has received Your' aPPlication for op�xation of rental lice�.se property at 541 - 53 1/2 Avenue N.E. As you are aw'are� �'i�-ey City C�oc�e 220 requires that a li�se be obtained for all rental proPertY in the City. Iast year, I sent you a letter (copy enclosed) co��! oP�dtion of these rental units. At that time, I reminded you that tiv-S P� �t be brought into conformanoe with the FYidley Zoning dode by May 6, 1994. Specifically. You must oca��ly with the followi.ng two items by that time: 1. There mu.st be no more than fi�e �lated Peo��le �i���g i� -t�e residei�. 2. one or more pexsons living in the residenoe must have ac�cess to the entire structure. Zhe City Council will consider your rental license application at its September 13, 1993, meeting. I am reconunending that the Cou�cil appr�e y� ��- license only through P�1ay 6, 1994. Since this cavers a Pe.�'iod of only eight months,. the City would refurid one-thi�i ($8.00) of your rental lic�tise fee- You are welcon� to attend the September 13 , 1993 , City Council meeting to ��5 any conc�xzls you may have regarding consideration of your rental license application. The me�ting will begin at 7:30 p.m. at t�he �idley Miuiicipal Center (6431 University Avenue N.E.). Ple.ase call me at 572-3595 if you have questions or wish to discuss th�s fur�h�'' Sincerely, steven Barg Planning Assistant SB:ls M-93-212 ,r.-J �--�7 3 � City of Fridley, 1Vlinnesota c/o Fridley Fire Dept. 64�31 University Ave. NE Fridley, MN 55432 (612)572-3612 LICENSE APPLICAT[ON FOR RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY �'� Tf-IE CI"I'Y COUNCIL OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA: The undersigned hereby makes appiication to Iicense a residential dweilin� iu ticcordance with Chapter 220 of the City Code of Fridley. _ PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Buildi��� Address: 4042 Main Street NE No. of Units: 2 Lic. Fee: 24.00 Owner's 1Vame: David Menken, Fuller Owner's Address: 375 Belmont Lane E. City St�fe Zi Name: Address: City Siate Zi lewood, MN 55117 Paul Gaydos, Susan BUILDING MANAGER OR AGENT (if different from TIO Phone #: 774-9952 Phone #: I l�ereby certify that no order of the City to repair, correct or improve any part of this building or any dwelli�ig unit therein or pertaining to the operation thereof has been issued, or is presently outstanding which l�as not been fully complied with, to the complete satisfaction of any and all inspection of�cers of the City, to tlie bes�y kno�vledge, exc�t as follows: �i��at � No. oC Rental Units Fee 1 �12.0� 2 $24.00 3-7 $36.00 8-12 $49.00 Over 1'2 $49.00 +$2 for each unit over 12 PLEASE NOTE IF OVER 12 UNI"I'S: "Section 220.n9 :equires os.>ners of buildings with more than 12 units to contraet for recycling serv'sces. Please attach a copy of your contract for recycling services to this application. Failure to do this may result in the denial of this applieation." Please note: Section 11.11: The penalty for late payment of all license fees as showin in Section 11.10 of the City Code shall be 25% of the amount of the fee if received from 1 to 7 days late. If tlie payment is received itiore than 7 days after it is due, the penalty shall be SO% of the fee. �x�x�x*�x*�*M�x����x*�x�x**�*�x�*��x�xx�**�x*�x***��x�x*�x�x���x****�x*****�x*�x*�x�x*�x**�*�x*�x*�**�x**�x�x****�x�***** For City Use Only: -�pproved Derzied Date Zoning Fire Dep� City Council Authorized Signature : _ C�� �F FRi DLEY FRIDLEY MUNIC(PAL CENTER • G431 UN(VERSITY AVE_ N.E. FRIDLEY, MN SSa32 •(6121571-34>0 • FAX (612) 571-1287 September 2, 1993 David arr_i Rebeoc'.a Men�n Paul Gaydos and S�isan FLtller 375 Belm�nt I�ne .East Maplewood, MN 55117 �- � ..- • - 'Ihe City of Fridley has received your application for operati-on of rental 3.ioense property at 4042 Main Street N.E. As you are aware� F�'idley City Cod2 220 L-�equires th,at a lic�se be obtained for all rental proPert-Y in the City. Iast year, I sent you a letter (copy enclos�d) conoen�irKJ operation of these rental �its. At that time, I�ed you that this properti-Y m�st be braue�lt into oonformar�ce with the FYidley Zoning Oode by May 6, 1994. S�cificaliy, y� must oo�ly with the follawing two items by that time: l. There must be no more� than five unrelated people living in the residenc�. 2. One or more persons livi.rig in the residence must have access to the entire structure- `Iiie City Council will consider your rental license application at its Sept�nbe,r 13 , 1993 , meetirig. I am reconmier�ding t1�at the Cou��ci1 aPP�e your rental license only through May 6, i994. Since this cavers a Pe.r'i°d of only� eic�t months, the City would refund one-thisd ($8-��) of your rental lioense fee. You are wel� to attexxi the September 13 , 1993 , City Qouncil meeting to express any con��s you may have rega�ling consideration of your rental. licer�se application_ The meeting will b�in at 7:30 p.m. at the �idley M�uiicipal Cen�er (6431 University Avenue N.E.). Pleas� cal-1 me at 572-3595 if you have questions or wish to discuss th�-S fu�th�'' Sincerely, Steven B��g Planning Assistant SB: ls M-93-212 : �, CITY OF FRIDLEY MEMORANDOM ,,�,a� TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER fi:"` FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSOLIDATION OF THE FRIDLEY POLICE RELIEF ASSOCIATION'S POLICE PENSION DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1993 The Fridley Police Relief Association is seeking approval to consolidate their Police Pension Association with the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). As a result, we would like to establish a public hearing for the consolidation of police pension on Monday, September 27, 1993. 19 i �. TO: FROM: SIIBJECT: DATE: WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �� RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCL DIRECTOR PAIIL 8. HANSEN, STAFF ACCOIINTANT 1994 BIIDGET PIIBLIC HEARING DATE Beptember 2, 1993 Minnesota Statute requires local governments to hearings on their budgets. The public hearing dates to be set and certified to the County by September required to hold the hearings between November 29 and The continuation hearing must be at least 5 but no days after the initial hearing. hold public are required 15. We are December 20. more than 14 We have attached a letter from the Anoka County Auditor informing us of the Public Hearing dates the County and the School Districts have set for their budgets. We recommend Council set December 1 as the Public Hearing date on the 1994 Budget and December 13 as the reconvening date if one is needed and the subsequent hearing on December 20. If the reconvening date is not needed �ae will move the subsequent hearing to December 13. The League of Minnesota Cities said it would be legal to hold a subsequent hearing on December 20. We can not hold a meeting in November because on the two available days, November 29 and 30, the� Metropolitan Agencies and School Districts hold their public hearing meetings respectively. In order to hold the continuation and subsequent hearings on regular scheduled council meeting dates the only dates available for the public hearing are December 1 through December 3. Realistically that leaves Wednesday and Thursday and we chose Wednesday December 1. RDP/ph Attachments zo � _?o�;'�o��._ :. P -•'�.�..�[[ _ n,, � •\�L. M�hhE504p August 18, 1993 RiIG � � i993 �OUNTY C�� ANOKA � DIVISION OF PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION Edward M. Treska, Division Manager GOVERNMENT CENTER • 2100-3RD AVENUE • ANOKA, MN 55303 The Honorable, William Nee Mayor of Fridley 6431 University Ave NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Mayor Nee: The Truth in Taxation law, M.S. 275.U65 requires cii:ies to hold a public budget hearing for property taxes payable in the year 1994. The dates for this hearing cannot conflict with the public hearing and continuation dates set by the county, metropolitan agencies or the school districts located in your city. These hearings must be held between November 29 and December 20. The continuation hearing must be at least 5 but no more than 14 business days after your initial hearing. The following taxing districts within your city have set the following hearing dates: TAXING DISTRICT ✓Anoka County.......... ✓�Ietropolitan agencies. ✓School District #11... ✓School District #13... ''School District #14... �School District #16... HEARING DATE ....December ....November ....November ....November ....November ....November RECONVENTNG DATE 14.......December 20 29.......December 6 30.......December 7 30.......December 7 30.......December 7 30.......December 7 With this information you can now set the initial date for your public hearing and a date for recommencing the meeting, if necessary. In addition, the time and location of the initial meeting, the phone number an interested taxpayer may call and your payable 1994 certified proposed property tax levy is due on or before September 15, 1993. I have enclosed a certification form for your convenience. If you have any questions concerning the Truth in Taxation process, please contact me at 323-5438. Sincer ly,__. _ �\ \ � ; ._ �� ` _�- ` �t,c,�t.,, Di k Sivanich Innerdepartmental Accountant Affirmative Action�efj� Opportunity Employer Nov�r�%�:r, 1��� .. . .. .. -. .. .. .. . .. . � ,; , �j� ,.;::, ,;:>� ,; � ,- ;- �����! A000000.1=11 �t^11 �L^11 �. 1�1i �l^�! � <� -i..� r..� <i.�� r :� �i.�� r :� �i. �� r:.� �i..� r..� -i.�� �� � � � �� � �� � � � � � 1.���1 1'��i �'��.1 Il��l I'��I I'��I : . , .�L},..GOCOGOGI'1�::• �J�t �•�•�l .�1•�:�• �',�::� �'��,1 ♦�l Li�! L;11f 1;11,t 1�1,! 1;11I i��l ��..� �i.�� ��..� �i.�� r..,� �i.�� r..�; i.��� ��..� �i.��� r..� �i.�� r..� �i.�'� !1 � �I 11 � �I !� � �I I! � �I l.� � �� 1f � �I �j � �13 , , ; , ,. f�1.1 �!�^:�� �f�:.t �r�^:;L �fr^�t �'��'` .AGOd000.`���t ���l l��l �a000000lti)�r ta1,r ia1,r i��r l±rr ��..�;i.��� ��..iri..,� �r..�,i.�� ��..��i.�� ���.�,i_.,� �r..��i.��� �r..��a.�� �f � �� I� � �I l.j � �I I� � �l l.� � �1 l.� � �I !� � �1 , : �:::, ;-:, ,:;>, ,:;::, ,:-:. �:;::, ,;::. �er �l^'•i ��_ir �Hii �t^:'r ���'•i ,�li:i �r..��.a►.�� �r..�-i.�� �f:.��i.�� ��..�<�..�� �►:.�<i..� ��.;��i.�� ��..i.�i.�� l.� .� �l l.j � �i l.� � �l I� � �1 f� � �1 Il � ll 1j � '1 : . , .��:� �1 . . . _ . . �►..� �....� - - � l,f � • .`- '- �: � Sunday �;�_; j.■,i.��� ' � � ��; :t L�1! ► .l.�.l.•J ��j� ��� � • .��::;� .�_„ �/..I.�.�.ti 1� l� � 1� � r::;� .��.,, �F..l `.�•ti �� l.� � �1 ����r�l�er, 1�'�� Manday Tuesday �+ednesday Thursday Friday Saturday � �********** �**::****** 4 Possible Possible Public Public Initial Public Hearinp Hearin� Hearin� Datie Da�e ��� ,.;; � � Metropolit,an Apencies Reconvenin� DaLe % School Dis- t,rict's Re- convenin� pate t� �ont,inuation 14 �� Hearin� Cif Neces- public Hear- sary) �n� fbr Anoka If not: Coun�y Subsequent Hearinp Fridley's Subsequent Hearin� CAnoka Coun- ties Recon- veninp Date) -,t �i.:, �..1.�1.•� ��� L�� � ,; � �",, $�_'!'�-� � �� ��� : .�r;., .,:.:f 1:.1 •�., � i� �. �i �l;i�l �r..i�i.�� I�- � �1 .�,;;, ' ='' /../ ��.�� 1!� � �1 • ,:., .��^„ f .r �l.•� ��i ��� � s******�***Is***s***s**I � �� �� �tii1,f ��:.��i.�� i���l . �r'1 :� L�1f r..f.�i.�� ��r � ��� .;:, ��^:, �►"�.`�''��, !j � �1 1 ��:� ,�t.,, �I..1: �.� � I� � �1 ����$�,(,� ,; � +0006JOOlLi1t �r,.�;�.��� l� � �i �1'� �l 1�1! r..�.�i.�� ��� � ��� . �,.:., ,::.� f .l:�l.�i ��� til� �rr ��::� '_,� ►..! �l.•� ��l til� � : �1111 o��o� . �'�;i.�� ��� � �l� f� :l �L^1f r .�.�i.�� �rr til� � i ::� .a�.ti..•� F..l.�l.� � !' �-'l Note: The subsequen� hearing date can �e the s�m� as the �c�unty's reconvenin� d�te 2oc TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��� . FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYI., FINANCE DIREGTOR PAUL S. HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING A"PROPOSED" BUDGET FOR THE F�SCAL YEAR 1994 DATE: September 8, 1993 In conformance with Chapter 275, Section 065 of the Minnesota Statutes, attached is the "proposed" 1994 Preliminary Draft Budget Chapter 275 requires the City to certify a"proposed" budget to the County Auditor prior to September 15. We request the City Council pass the attached resolution and adopt the 1994 "Proposed" Budget. RDP/ph Attachment 2� RESOLUTION NO. - 1993 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A"PROPOSED" BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994 WHEREAS, Chapter 7, Section 7.04 of the City Charter provides that the City Manager shal! prepare an annual budget; and WHEREAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Statutes requires that the City shall adopt a proposed budget before September 15; and WHEREAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Statutes requires that such "proposed" budget be certified to the County Auditor; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following "proposed" budget be adopted and approved: GENERAL FUND Taxes and Special Assessments: Current Ad Valorem Deli�quent, Penalties, Forfeited Special Assessments Licenses and Permits: Licenses Permits I ntergovernmental: Federal State - Homestead a�d Agriculture Credit Aid �ocal Govemment Aid All Other Charges for Services Housing and Redevelopment Authority Water Fund Sewer Fund Storm Water Fund Liquor Fund Cable TV Fund Construction Fu�ds Fines and Forfeits Interest on Investments Miscellaneous Revenues Other Financing Sources: Employee Benefd Fund Closed Debt Service Fund TOTAL REVENUES AWD OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Fund Balance: General Fund Reserve TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1994 DRAFT BUDGET RESOLU110N ESTIMATED REVENUE $3.531.569 66,547 1,896 132,270 288,356 5,803 1,015,042 1,558,917 432,532 313,676 174,376 125.195 90,854 28,969 65,397 19,849 31,129 242,392 430,000 96,886 200,000 248,414 9,100,069 239,655 $9.339.724 21A Legislative: City Council Planning Comm'issions Other Commissions City Managemerrt: General Management Peisonnel Legal Finance: Eledions Accounting Assessing MIS City Clerk/Records Police: PoC�ce Civil Defense Fire: Public Works: Civic Center Technical Engineering Traffic Engineering Street Lighting Public Works Maintenance Recreation: Recreation Naturalist Community Development: Building Inspection Planning Reserve: Eme�gency No�departmental: APPROPRIATIONS $92,892 3,523 7,099 305,814 90,884 160,000 29,801 483,624 167,347 144,409 • 95,468 3,057,836 8,784 742,508 192,207 442,608 80,545 144,700 1,594,180 559,825 243,608 195,906 255,455 185,000 55,701 $9.339.724 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Cable N Fund g� � �,47� Grant Management Fund 189,454 Solid Waste Abatement Fund 218,056 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $518.985 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Capital Improvement Fund Taxes — Current Ad Valorem Interest on Investments Donations State Aid Construction Fund Balance TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS AGENCY FUND Six Cities Watershed Fund Taxes — Current Ad Valorem TOTAL AGENCY FUND rC�Yr_i� $85,550 418,672 10,000 600,000 453,778 a� ,ss8,000 $3,500 53,500 $11,430,209 General Capital Improvement Streets Capitat Improvement Parks Capital Imp�ovement PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS SEPTEMBER, 1993 ATTEST: n �.� ■.�. . .. r : WILLIAM J. NEE - MAY R $111.475 189,454 218,056 $518,985 $340,000 1,034.000 194,000 $�,sss,000 $3,500 $3,500 $11,430,209 DAY OF . TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER �� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYI., FINANCE DIRECTOR PAUL S HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING "PROPOSED" TAX LEVY REQUIREMENTS FOR 1994 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR COLLECTION DATE: September 8, 1993 In conformance with Chapter 275, Section 06$ of the Minnesota Statutes, attached is a resolution certifying "proposed" t� levy requirements to the Anoka County Auditor. Chapter 275 requires the City to certify iYs "proposed" tax levy requirements prior to September 15. The 1994 "proposed" tax levy of $3,678,665 represents a 0% increase over the 1991 & 1992 levies without taking into consideration the accounting change, required by the new Minnesota Statute, which requires the HACA amount to be deducted from the budget levy amount. The 1994 "proposed" ta�c levy actually represents a 22.6% decrease over the 1991 & 1992 levies after deducting the HACA amount. We request the City Council pass the attached resolution to certify the "proposed" tax levy requirements. R DP/sf Attachment 22 RESaLIITION NO. - 1993 A RESOLIITION CERTIFYING ��PROPOSED�� TA% LEVY REQIIIREMBNTS FOR 1994 TO THE COIINTY OF ANORA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Chapter 275, Section 065 requires the City to certify it's "proposed" tax levy requirements to the County Auditor; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley certify to the County Auditor of the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, the following "proposed" tax levy to be levied in 1993 for the year 1994. GENERAL FUND General Fund CAPITAL PROJECT FUND Capital Improvement Fund - Parks Division AGENCY FUND Six Cities Watershed Management Organization TOTAL ALL FUNDS $3,603,266 $ 72,689 $ 2,710 $3,678,665 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 22A TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��. � FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO THE 1992 BUDGET DATE: September S, 1993 Attached you will find a resolution amending appropriations to the 1992 Budget in accordance with the City Charter. The adjustments listed have arisen as a result of donations, items budgeted in the incorrect categories, auditor adjushnents, and unforseen expenditures. All ad}ushnents have been informally approved by you through the Budget Reappropriation Form. We request that Council approve the amendment of the attached budgets. RDP/ph Attachment a , t 23 RE90I,�TPI�J I�U. - 1993 •1.7:• I •i • I Y:'� • � M:/� H�ti I •.� •' I• •J �. •• Y:1' N.'il I.'}I• • 11 1� N• : • 11 I� C!' • I• I� N� I�I 11 I� :1' • '1:�i1 1: 1'ti'1� lyi I� �• �' • I� H� 1: ■ ••1 7i 1•J" 11 I� � �� Y.1" M• • V• / 1•',� •� lyi ^'ll I� • ' Y:t" 1:+r• • Wf�REAS, the Goverrnne.nt Fin�nce Offic:ers Association require"s that all line items within divisions reflect favorable a�t balances in the Annual Report; and Wf�REAS, the City of Fridley has iurvolved itself in initiatives that pravide for future chan�es and modifications that will pravide for a better delivexy of Se,rviCe, dlld WI�REA.S, the City of �idley had r�t incorporated these and other necessary changes into the adopted bixdget for 1992. NOW, TFIEEtE�RE $E IT RESOLVED, that the Yxadgets of the following clivisions and funds be amex�ded as follaws: REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS DONATIONS - CffY MANAGER EMERCENCY RESERVE - ACCOUNTING EMERCENCY RESERVE - POUCE DONATION - POLICE DONATION - POLICE DONATION - POL�E DONATION - FIRE DONATION - FIRE DONATION - FIRE DONATION - FIRE DONATION - FIRE MtSCELLANEOUS GRANT - PUBLIC WORKS MAIIJTENANCE DONATION - RECREATION DONATION - RECREATION DONATION - NATURAUST DONATION - NATURALIST EMERGENCY RESEHVE - PUBUC WORKS DONATION - NATURAUST EMERGENCY RESERVE - PERSONNEL TOTAL REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS APPR�PRIATION ADJUSTMENTS CITY MANAGER PERSONNEL ACCOUNTING MtS GENERALFUND CAPffAL OUTLAY PERSONALSERVICES SUPPUES/CHARGES SUPPLJES/CHARGES CAPffAL OUTLAY PERSONAL SEAVICES SUPPUES/CHARGES CAPffAL OUTLAY CAPffAL OUTLAY 23A 250 FRIDLEY LION'S CLUB 24,800 STUDY OF "CHARGES FOR SERVICES" 2,500 NATIONAL IVIGHT 011T 200 MARY GABRELCIK (FRANKS USED CARS) 300 MINCO PRODUCTS 111 BURGER KING 300 MINCO PRODUCTS 144 5,500 KURT MANUFACTURING 1.208 5250 SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS 575 REIMBURSEMEM CHECK 6,000 DNR 300 FRIDLE1f UON'S C W B 2,137 FRiDLEY WN'S CLUB & FRIDLEY JAYCEES 200 MINCO PRODUCTS 25 4,256 REPAIR BOILER WATER UNE/WORK COMP 200 FRIDLEY STATE BANK 1,970 FOR PERSONALSERVICES 54.226 250 SISTER CfTIES PROGRAM 2,784 YEAR- END ADJUSTMENT (814)YEAR- END ADJUSTMENT 24,800 STUDY OF "CHARGES FOR SERVICES" (2,000)TO MIS 29 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT (29)YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT 3,000 TAPE DRNE UI'GRADE 2,000 MEMORY UPGRADE . . �y. •��: • 1 •:� �"i CfTY CI.ERK/RECOROS - 1993 CAPRAL OUTLAY POLICE SUPPIIES/CIiARGES SUPPLJES/qiARGES SUPPLJES/CHARGES SUPPUES/CHAAGES SUPPUESJCFIARGES PERSONALSERVICES FIRE MUNICIPAL CENTER TECHNICAL ENGINEERING PUBLJC WORK MAINTENANCE RECREATION (3,000)TO MIS 2.500 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT 200 DARE PROGRAM 300 CRIME PREVHJTION FUND 111 CRJME PREVBJfION FUND 2,367 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT (2.36�YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT SUPPLJES/CHARGES 300 FlRE PREVENTION EDUCATION SUPPUES/CHARGES 144 SUPPUES/CHARGES 3,500 REFURB VEHtCLE 3394 SUPPLIES/CHARGES 1.208 COLORING BOOKS CAPRALOUTIAY 5,250 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EQUIPMENTTRAILER SUPPUES/CHARGES 575 HAZMATTRAINING SUPPUES/CHARGES 790 YEAR-ENO ADJUSTMENT PERSONAL SERVICES (790)YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT CAPRALOUTLAY 324 FLOOR BUFFER SUPPUES/CHARGES (324) PERSONAI SERVICES 827 VIfORKERS COMPENSATION SUPPUES/CHARGES 3,429 REPAIR BOILER WATER UNE BREAK SUPPUES/CHARGES PERSONALSERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY SUPPUES/CHARGES PERSONALSERVICES SUPPUES/CHARGES SUPPIJES/CFIARGES CAPITALOUTLAY 1.783 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT (1,783)YEAR-END ADJUSTTAENT 8,589 EQUIP DUMP TRUCK #725 (8.589) 2,121 OAK WIIT SUPPRESSION PROGRAM 3,879 OAK WILT SUPPRESSION PRO(iRAM 300'WNCH W(TH SANTA" EVENT 2,137 FLOOR MATTING MOORE LAKE BEACH WARM HOUSE NATURALIST SUPPUES/CFIARGES 200 NATURE CENTER PROGRAMMING SUPPLIESJCHARGES 25 NATURE CENTER PROGRAMMING SUPPUES/CHARGES 200 COOKING DEMONSTRATIONS NONDEPARTMENTAL PERSONALSERVICES 9 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT SUPPUESJCHARGES (9)YEAR-END AOJUSTMENT TOTAL APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 54,226 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS CABLE N FUND PERSONAL SERVICES 18,619 RECLASSIFICATION OTHER FINANCING USES (18,619)RECLASSIFICATION 0 GRANT MANAGEMENT FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL 250,000 MCGLYNN'S GRANT SUPPUES/CHARGES 250,000 MCGLYNN'S GRANT HRA REIMBURSHv1ENT FUNO ItYTERGOVERNMENTAL 49,938 UNBUDGETED ACTNffY SUPPUES/CHARGES 49,938 UNBUDGETED ACTNtTY 23B P21GE 3- RE80LjTt'I�T I�A. - 1993 Oi�1G AND GAMBUNG FORFEITURE FUND REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS FINES AND FORFEITS 11,375 APPR�PRIATION ADJUSTMENTS SUPPUES�CHARGES 7,933 APPR�PRIATION ADJUSTMENTS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNOS TRANSFERS OUT 19,590 TO CORRECT ERROR IN TRANSFER TO HRA SUPPUES/CIiARGES 23,707 IXPENDITURES IN IXCESS OF BUDGET CAPtTAL OUTLAY (43,29� 0 •• 81► • f � N' Y�1� : � 1 M ��' N� • 1 I i ' Il � � �• � �i' � I'1�1' f�- r /• I ` • M �I •� / WIIS,I�M J. NEE - NJAYOR 23C TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��. � FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR HOWARD D. KOOLICK, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: DESIGNATIONS OF 1992 FUND BALANCES DATE: September 8, 1993 In accordance with City policy and generally accepted accounting principies portions of the 1992 fund balance are shown as being designated in the Comprehensive Annual Financial. Report. A designation of fund balance is used to show the intended uses of resources in a future period. The amounts shown are not legally binding upon the City. Designations were recorded in the General Fund, Speciat Revenue Funds and,the Capital Improvements Fund. The General Fund designations were set up according to the guidelines contained in Resolution number 46-1991, a copy of which is attached. The designations in all other funds were based on generally accepted accounting principles. The following designations are used by the City: Designated for WorkinA Capital - Represents the funds needed to finance general fund operations until the first property tax collection in June. Desiqnated for Subsequent Years' Expenditures - Represents the portion of 1992 fund balance that is budgeted for use in 1993. Desiqnated for Continqencies - Represents funds available for unforeseen emergencies. Designated for Replacement of Fixed Assets - Represents funds set aside for the future replacement of capital outlay items. Designated for Cable N Proqram - Represents funds available in the Cable TV Fund for future programming and cable N needs. Designated for Sofid Waste Abatement - Represents the funds available in the Solid Waste Abatement Fund to finance future operations. The balance in the designation is the accumulated surplus from past operating activities. Designated for Druq and Gamblinq Enforcement - Represents the funds available in the Drug and Gambling Forfeiture Fund for future enforcement. The balance in the designation is the surplus of funds received less enforcement activities. Desiqnated for Street Improvements - Represents the funds available in the Capital Improvements Fund to finance future street improvement projects identified in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. Desiclnated for Park Improvements - Represents the funds available in the Capital Improvements Fund to finance future park improvements identified in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. 24 DESIGNATIONS OF 1992 FUND BALANCES September 8, 1993 PAGE 2 The portion of the General Fund fund balance in excess of the designations was recorded as unreserved and undesignated. The entire fund balance in the special revenue fund and the Capital Improvements Fund are designated. The attached resolution needs to be passed by Council to formally adopt the 1992 designations. 24A s. RE.90I�ION I�. 46 - 1991 RESQLITPION DESIC�iTIlaG I�IINIMtA"i F[R�ID BAI�•S Wf�E2E'AS , maj or revenue sources of the city' s general fund ar'e received in the latter part of each fiscal year with disbursemer�ts occurrinq relatively evenly throughout the year; arid WHEREAS, this timing difference between cash receipts and cash disbuzse�nents creates cash flaw deficiencies unless sufficient fund balance levels are designated to meet the working capital needs in the first half of the year; and WI�REAS, unfor�Seen reductions in major intergoverrnnental revenues or unanticipated e.xperraiture needs remain a recurririg threat tA cities; and W�IIERFAS, establishment of a minim�nn designation of fund balance for such contingencies would mitigate the adver�.�e effec�ts of aid reductions or unanticipated experiditur'es: and - WF�RRF'�AS, anticipated uses of f�uxl balance-s for planned future obligations, should be disclosed in the annual financial statements by designation of fund balances: arid Wf-IERFAS, formal establishment of minitm�n general fund balance levels helps maintain the city's favorable bond rating which translates into lower borrowinq costs. NpW, T�pRE, BE IT R��OLUED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, that to the extent of available total fund balance, that designations of fund balance be established at the end of each year in the order set forth as follows: 1. A designation for working capital equallirig 50% of the ensuing year's � budgeted local government aid plus the property tax levy (including any state paid portion); 2. A designation for subseguent years' expenditures for uses of fund balance as set forth in the ensuing year's adopted annual budget; 3. A designation for contirigencies equal to 10% of the general fund budgeted expenditu.res and other financing uses for the ensuing year; 4. A designation for replacement of fixed assets in an amount not less than 5% of the General FUnd irrvest�nent in General Fixed Assets as identified in the Camprehensive Annual Financial Report. PASSED AND ADOP'1'ED BY 7� CIZ'Y OOUNCIL OF 7� CI'I'Y OF FRIDLEX Z�IIS 20Tfi DAY OF MAY, 1991. , C/ V WILLTAM J. NEE - YOR ATl'ES'I': , ��_ SHIRT �.v A. AIA - C CL�',RK _. � RESOLUTION NO. - 1993 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING 1992 FUND BALANCES WHEREAS, designating a portion of fund balance is recognized as the proper format for reporting anticipated fut�re uses oi fund balance; and WHEREAS, designations of fund balance are also appropriate as a means of mitigating the adverse effects of either reductions in major revenue sources or unanticipated expenditures; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 46 -1991 which established minimum designations of fund balance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, that the 1992 fund balance designations are as follows: GENERAL FUND Designated for Working Capital Designated for Subsequent Years' Expenditures Designated for Contingencies Designated for Replacement of Fixed Assets CABLE TV FUND Designated for Cable N Program Designated for Subsequent Years' Expenditures SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT FUND Designated for Solid Waste Abatement DRUG & GAMBLING FORFEITURE FUND Designated for Drug and Gambling Enforcement CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND Designated for Street Improvements Designated for Park Improvements Designated for Replacement of Fixed Assets $3,029,348 $308,160 $908,366 $1,423,584 $118,243 $3, 293 $37, 648 $14,960 $5,442,419 $934,493 $1,798,084 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. HAMPA - ITY LERK 24C WILLIAM J. NEE - MAY R INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM MEMO TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MA,ATAGER � �� CHUCK MCKUSICK, CHIEF � August 13, 1993 FIRE TRAINING SITE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT Subject agreement was revised per your earlier direction and submitted to each of the parties for signature. I am advised by Chief Ron Fagerstrom that he is submitting it to the Spring Lake Park, Blaine and Mounds View city councils for approval. I anticipate receiving the Brooklyn Center approval soon, since that Council approved funding just a few weeks ago. Would you submit Fridley's copy of the agreement (enclosed) for action by our Council. As previously noted, the principle change is the deletion of Columbia Heights from the Joint Powers Agreement. AMENDMENT OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF FIRE TRAINING SITE WHEREAS, the parties who are signators below had entered an agreement titled "Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training Association", a copy of which is attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the only expenditure of funds to date pursuant to said agreement has been by the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS, a party to the agreement, the City of Columbia Heights, has given written notice to the other parties via letter dated August 10, 1992, that it no longer wishes to participate in the agreement; and WHEREAS, the remaining parties desire to amend said agreement in order to continue the project of constructing and operating a fire training site; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties agree to the following modifications of the agreement: 1. Deletion of Columbia Heights: Delete from the "Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training Association" (copy attached, and hereafter called the AGREEMENT), the City of Columbia Heights, wherever that name appears, and change the number of "member departments" from four to three wherever stated. The undersigned hereby acknowledge receipt of a termination notice from the City of Columbia Heights by letter dated August 10, 1992 from its attorney Greggory J. Woods, and accept the termination in accordance with paragraph 16 of the AGREEMENT. There exists no claim against Columbia Heights for proportionate share of initial construction costs or operating costs. 2. Initial Construction: The "initial construction costs" identified in paragraph 6 of the AGREEMENT shall be changed to $150,000, it being understood that the parties may later increase this amount if additional contributions are approved by the parties' respective governing bodies. 25A PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES 3. Operating Budget: . The statement in paragraph 7 of the AGREEMENT citing the 1991 Operating Budget is deleted. 4. Amendment: The AGREEMENT amendment procedure shall require unanimous approval of the parties, in lieu of majority approval, reflecting the existence of three rather than four parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned approve these amendments by authority of their duly authorized governing bodies on the date of their signature below. CITY OF FRIDLEY By — Title CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER By — Title Date Date SPRING LAKE PARK, BLAINE, MOUNDS VIEW FIRE DEPT., INC. BY — Title DIR: C:\WP\TRAIN.2 . 25B Date Engineering y Sewer F Y Water Q� � O Parks O 3 Streets VU Maintenance W —� � m �a � � MEMORANDUM TO: Wiiliam W. Burns, City Manager �� � PW93-332 FROM: John G. Flora, �ublic Works Director DATE: September 2, 1993 SU&IECT: Stinson Boulevard Improvement We received a petition from residents on Stinson Blvd between 73rd Avenue and Osborne Road. Of the 18 residents, 16 (89%) signed the petition in favor of improving the street, installing concrete curb and gutter and assessing the properties for an amount not-to-exceed $8.00 per front foot for the concrete curb and gutter. Also included in the petition was the width of the rebuilt street. Ten of the 16 (63%) support building the street to 38 feet wide with parking on both sides. , Mounds View is also processing a petition with residents on their side of the street. It is expected that they will also receive a favorable response so that this project can be incorporated into our 1994 street improvement program. Recommend the City Council receive the petition. When Mounds View has received their petition, we will attempt to schedule the project with the Ramsey County Engineer to design so that public hearings and project advertisement can be accomplished in early 1994. JGF: cz Attachment 26 ' CIfYOF FRIDLEY i�� STREET IMPROVEMENT PETfT10N We the residents on Stinson Boulevard petition the City to improve our street with asphalt surface and concrete curb and gutter. We understand that we will be assessed for the concrete curb and gutter for a cos# not to exceed $8,00 per front foot. We also understand that the width of the street will be determined by the majority opinion based on parking on one side or both sides of the street. PARKING ADDRESS SIGNATURE ONE SIDE 3 BOTH SIDES FR MV ,��i Edward Viesselman ?610 Stinson Blvd � Fridley MN 55432 Earl \Nelle 7624 Stinson Blvd �� � Fridley MN 55432 Ro.�ert Hend�:� sen 7600 Stinsor; Blvd �� � � Fridley MN 55432 Terry Closson 7584 Stinson Blvd c��'`��''`r�- r=ridley MN 554�2 Ly��i I L, a b 7 Frid Ronald Dufault � 7566 Stinson Blvd , • _ � Fridley NIN 55432 � ,J4 . • Ronald Murray 7500 Stinson Blvd _ Fridl2y MN 55432 Anthony Roame 7376 Stinson �Blvd --- J� Fridlay MN 554�2 ( ��"'�--- / � ��.,`a �� �(�)���J � ���z os Bo�.� �.D �,D�Ey nn� 55y�3� � (�k�C��..D SUfl(?�21 P� 3z / �Dt4a UJA�% �.� PARKING ADDRESS SIGNATURE ONE SIDE ,3� � BOTH SIDES FR MV 3�/ �6�n t � c,��j 7360 Stinson Bivd � � Fridley MN 55432 Robert Bertram 7340 Stinson Bivd ��=(/ _ Fridley MN 55432 / John Hildreth 7490 Stinsen Blvd Fridley MN 55�32 John Collodora � � ���� 747� Stinson Blvd � x Fridley UIV 55432 Larry Pearson � �� 7450 Stinson Blvd � , � Fridley MN 55432 - --� a, 1 � , ,� Mic��ael Miles �' i I7436 Stinson Blvd Fridley MN 55432 ` ; � � Orton 7418 Stinson Blvd � Fridley MN 55432 _� �. �i�-�-� Joseph Daml �� 7400 Stinson 81vd Fridley P11N 55432 Marlin Mii!er - ✓�/.�.� i�� 7540 Stinson Blvd • Fridley ti"P: 55432 - -�3S5tLi�iit ,�rr��`�c� � 7528 Stinson Blvd � Fridley MN 55432 ��� -�t �:�-��' Bruce Fyksen 7518 Stinson Blti��! � Fridley MN 55432 , �j,� �-,�.liz� � S'�PPm/Z �i' -3 � -f- 2a.a-�{ �i�2lG...�f F�� �-�y s, :G ,/� � .� 7.� 2d �-�e �� 2 �d�l� y� 26B Eng�neer�ng Sewer L'VTier MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager G FROM: John G. F1ora,rPublic Works Director DATE: September 13, 1993 SUBJECT: Hathaway Lane Improvement Project PW93-334 We received a petition from the residents on Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive: These 11 residents have petitioned the City to request that their street be upgraded with concrete curb and gutter, that they be assessed for the concrete curb and gutter at a cost not-to- exceed $8.00 per front foot, that the assessment would e�ctend over a 10-year period, and they also waived the requirement for notice of a public hearing so that the project can be incorporated into the Regis Drive work that is now being accomplished. Recommend the City Council receive the petition from the residents on Hathaway Lane. Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolutions calling for the final plans and specifications and receiving the final plans and specifications. Recommend the City Council approve the addition of this work into the ST 1993-1&2 Street Improvement Project as Change Order No. 1. JGF:cz Attachments 27 ,r . ,. ; _ -•J � r(-anu� -- � ovER- HATHAWAY KENNn�lp,y 'Y 68t� AvE�L� -� V . 0 Q N O I {.r:�` N � N � �~'�7� 0 9 �,vE_Q_F��, � �� 66th AVE. Churcr. �,_ �,t•:�•:t MtSSISSIPPI '�rn �~� � -. JZ o BENNETT � �R. p � -FOURMI ES � Z o o � X 6� t n � ,;-; � . . z .' n_. W S t� tn � U !) Z � ?, ��„ ,; ` i a w � o � w DRxN,E_ _ i 3 u. � Q � w 63ra r��= ��' AVE. N.E. °0 m :_.--1 ; � w ; '' ` z a .,,/ .'7' ., . . Q , 47 , _ � _ o � �p�`' _,_ a; v� W Q o t� :�_.1 �"I - _ V Z h . , : �61sf AVE. N.E. �l► :,r:. ,.. 7 � Q z � r- :- N - Moc H � � � F: ` '.- Z N __' ; .^; O° v' � � z �`: '�.`-�,�o o . Lai } N O _ .� � : N59t � �:: ; , 0 59th� ......_.......� ¢ N. E. Z ' � � j Q � ..jN � GOL� � � � 3 AVE T�R. (,9�' � � th F � r� .n r----,� �nnn - __ _____,_�___..�_ _ I Sondy Loke � 23 � 2 J '\ Q ti� � h- w th AVE. U I� � i-- � � 68th IMPROVEMENT � J� �'' ` "';'"`�' .� ��r II�Li. / ' �^f �bbiO AYt.% � 66 th ul K � I CREEK PP'� a Q Y I �,Q" � z � � sr. a a . � � � DA NA CT. 64th AVE. N. E. � 7� CAMEL OT `�' L 6 RICE CREEK � 53rd ~ ai AVE. w Q Z � v Z � w = Z � N. E. m J..,..:►- � ��"<< "rF � ac cL��:� GLAC�ER y � � o;;� '4cFk;::•� •� R. �� �: : � N �'.. . . F � G O I �__ 'Q i STRE�T RECONSTRUCTION PETITION HATHAWAY DRIVE � We the residents residing on Hathaway Drive east of Regis Drive, petition the City of Fridley to reconstruct our��-- - street. We understand the City would finance the asphalt curb removal, utility replacement and repair, new,_:: ��� �--- �-_-- asphalt surface; driveway reconnections and baulevard restoration. We understand that we will be _assessed_,:: ���_ -�- -- � for the concGete curb and gutter-�-on -a= front��-foot basis at a cost not-to-ezceed $8.00 per front foot :Ihis�: - assessment can be spread over 10 .years. � y��. We desire this improvement and request the City expedite this project and waive our rights to a public hearing for this improvement. <:::>:.>:::<:::.>:.:_:: _ ::; :.:::::::::::.; �<::>::>>::»>:;:»»>:;<:>::;::::»;:;:::::.�>:::::>::;»:>.::::.::;»::>;>::: _ ::>:«::;;:;: >::;:::.: � : :::: >;.:: . . ...... . . ... . ; ::>:::::::>:>:::::;>: ..:>:><�::::::>::::.:::::>:::::><:;::::::: 'GNATEIRE..«:::::>::<:�:<>:::{:`::':::::::>:>:<:>:_::`::::::<::<`:<:::::�>:::::�:>:::::<::»>:<:::<� ;:,:,....:..:: < :: .::.::. :.::R�S1�EI�tT..::>:>:>:::::::::>:::>:;.:::::::::::::::.::.:; ... ::: :.: _ ............ _. .......... ..:...:..:::::::::. :..�:SI. . .. _... . .... ...................: ::::::.:::.:.::.:::::::::::::::::.::.::::::::.. Orthodox Church � 1201 Hathaway Ln -.• �' I� a,,,�� /:;I!� '�v 'J � . � • I-• Fridley MN 55432 - James lacono � 1�3 ���(S ��. � 1217 Hathaway Ln ? .,,_ �� � Fridley MN 55432 � � j �'�3 • Doyle Mullin � - , ��,� ' � 1233 Hathaway Ln --.� ,;L; ;' ,.' - '' Fridley MN 55432 ' , � � �� � Roger Senstegard ,� " '��' � 1249 Hathaway Ln �,-�, � . ;� �,,� ; �i���✓l .` . Fridley MN 55432 - � � James Wolfe � I 1265 Hathaway Ln ���,'r� r�:�� ;�" ' i�� , � �v� � ,;; i � - Fridley MN 55432 � �� �/ �� � �; .� • Orville Sachs ' 1281 Hathaway Ln � � Fridley MN 55432 Michael Welsh 1202 Hathaway Ln �, � i � � y/;� ,�Gl��'L - , ' � . Fridley MN 55432 Phillip Vennewitz � \� ' � 1232 Hathaway Ln � - Fridley MN 55432 Dwaine Overby 1248 Hathaway Ln � � ; - �'� ; a � /��f ,� „ _ Fridley MN 55432 � �_��- r Stuart Thompson r- � �7 , � 1264 Hathaway Ln _ ���x- ��� / �-,(.,. Fridley MN 55432 _ . �; `.� ;; William Drigans ,�,1 � ----- 1280 Hathaway Ln �'� ' "-, `�� �, � � ° ' l� � � _:� Fridley MN 55432 ^"/ 27B RE9pLUTIO�T �. — 1993 �•�• • ••��• � � i••.••a� i�+ ° � n • ti • i� a�. � r• • •�� ��• a• • i� � i� u � • �+ � 1• •,• �+ ia� • •,• a • W�, a petition was received from the residents on Hat�iaway Iane east of Regis Drive, arid WF�REAS, their petition requests that their street be upgraded to include concrete curb and gutter, and W�.S, the petition establishes their agre�nt to an assessment for the concrete curb and gutter at a cost not-to-exceed $8.00 per front foot to be assessed aver a 10 year period, and WF�S, their petition also waives their right for a notice for a public hearing on this improvement, arid W�, the City Council has det.exmined a need to reconstruct cextain streets to maintain them in a safe condition and at a reasonable cost. NOW, Tf�ORE, BE IT RE.90LVED TF�iT, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follaws: l. That the followirig improvements proposed by Fetition No. _- 1993 are hereby ordered to be effected arid cc�npleted as soon as reasonably possible, to wit: Street is�ravements including gradirig, stabilized base, hot mix bit�ious mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, landsc�.apirig, and other facilities. 2. That the follcxairig street be incorporated in the 1993 Street I�ravemeazt Project No. ST. 1993-1. Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive 3. That the work to be perforntied ur�der this project may be performed uricier one or more contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids. 4. That the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, City Hall, Fridley, Minnesota, is hereby designated as the Eligineer for this i.�ravement. He shall prepare f;r�� plans and specifications for the makirig of such iYtq�rovements. PASSID APID ADOPi�D BY Tf� CITY DOUNCIL OF � CITY OF FRIDLEY T�IIS 13TH L1AY OF SEPI�IIt, 1993. : M��� WILLIAM A. CH�IMPA — CITY CL�2K : WILLIAM J. 1VEE — MAYOR RESOLUTI�1 I�U. - 1993 RF�OLUTI�T ORDERII�G I�� A1�ID AP'P�7VAL OF FII�L PL�S AI�ID ESTIl�TES OF 00.,cT3 T�OF ADID ADDING 't�0 T� 1993 STREE'I' PkO�TEGT AU. ST. 1993 - 1&2: �Y IAI� F�1ST OF REGIS DRIVE Wf�S, Petition No. - 1993 was received frvm 100% of the residents for i�rovement of Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive, and WI�A3, Petition No. _- 1993 waived the right for a public heari.ng, and Wf�REAB, Resolution No. _- 1993 ordered the improvement and final plans and specifications and estimates of costs and amerided Street Impravement Project No. ST. 1993- 1&2 by adding Hathaway Lane east of Regi.s Drive. Nl7W, T�ORE, BE IT RE90LVID TI�T, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, as follcsws: 1. That the follawing i�ravements proposed by City Council Resolution No. - 1993 are hereby orrlered to be effected and cc¢�q�leted as soon as reasonably possible, to- wit: Street im�rovements, including grading, stabilized base, hot mix bitLnninous mat, concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, landscaping, and other facilities located as follaws: iiathaway Iane East of R�egis Drive That the work irivolved in said impravements as listed above shall hereafter be desiqned as: HATt�,�Y I� EASI' OF RF3GIS DRIVE 2. �e plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works D�partm�nt for such impravements and each of them pu�suant to the Council resolutions heretofore adopted, a copy of which plans and specifications are hereto attached and made a part thereof, are hereby appraved ar�d shall be filed with the City Clerk. The Public Works D�xector shall accordingly include this work with the 1993 Street Rec.�nstruction Program. PASSID A1�ID ADOPl'ED BY Tf� CITY OOiJNCIL OF 'I'� CITY OF FRIDLEY 'ii�S 13'l�i I�AY OF SEPTII�IIt, 1993. WIT�.IAM J . NEE - MAYOR ATI�r: � �� ' « s��': �MY � �:. & 29 Erq+neennc, Sevre� 4Vaie� Par�s Slrec•:s "1lainter�t�Ce MEMORANDUM . TO: William W. Burns, City Manager c�� • � FROM: John G. F1ora,TPublic Works Director Scott Erickson, Asst Public Works Director3� DATE: September 13, 1993 PW93-333 SUBJECT: Resolutions Ordering Improvements, Final Plans and Approval of Final Plans for the Reconstruction of 7th Street The first resolution orders the improvement, final plans and estimates for the reconstruction of 7th Street. The second resolurion orders the improvement and approval of the final plans and estunates thereof. At the August 16 Council meeting, we conducted a public hearing for the reconstruction of 7th Street from Madison Street to 900 feet west Petitions for the street were received with 62.5% of the residents supporting the project The st�eet upgrade consists of minor widening, installation of concrete curb and gutter, and a bituminous overlay. The adjacent property owners wi11 be assessed for the concrete curb and gutter at a cost not to exceed $8.00 per front foot. Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolutions ordering the improvement, final plans and the approval of plans and adding this project to the 1993 Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1993�1&2. SE/JGF:cz Attachments 30 '� . ,. s � 66th AVE. _FOtlRMI ES � z :�3 r� ;tF�, 4i i � DR,N E� _,1'' Z 3 uW. 63�a1 � __ ,}'._- 41 ' ���� - ►= � >z, :r v' W - -- F= � Z y -.' -,?.��� � 61sf.. `�`.,'.-'AVE 7 __ �,; - .y a Z y v�i z `~ o `� ~ � z } "' S9t N � � N. E. _ W S > � 2 3 � A � fh �� �,� i r � ► w�,,,� i�w� � � � L� � ! �T.-> �R. Z N W Y 64 th � z � z O � W f O � W AVE. N. E. °0 m z Q > — 7TH STREET IMPROVEMENT ¢uL•, CREEK Pp'aK a �P- 1-=- p � ST a a � 53rd�' t~i� AVE. W Q 1-' � U Z � Q W � l4Q I I �� � i � i i � ��%`� I.. �- U a J z ,.."<� "'F a � 1ac. ct'�:� , � I / •.' S2nd � 7 J �- CIER �� �._./ � �'- Sandy AVE. N. E. m �LA y'�C '� •��� ' Lake I 23 2a :' .. '•��� =�� � . .. -�;_,_ _�,,._�.. s_•� • •': _"_ ''••.. • ::::•�:•_. /Y::: ••. R. :. � . _._._.� ...,. _..._, _ � ' 26 zs 65 --- r. ----- :-- Q N � n ~ T30NR24W a �� nn a � I' �"^ f . ' �/ � �, � � - - Q t RFSOLUTI�T 1�. - 1993 RE90I�7'rIOTT ORDERII3G ADID APPROVAL OF PI�1V� AI�ID ESTII�Il�'I'ES OF C�OS7.5 Tf�I2DOF ADID ADDIIJG TO 'I'� 1993 SI�r Il�()VII�NT P1�OJEGT I�U. ST. 1993 - 1& 2: 7TH SZ'REE'P Fii(JM 1�DI90�i STREET TO 900 F�ET WEST Wt�REAS, Resolution No. 54 - 1993 ordered the preliminaiy plans, specifications and estimates of the costs thereof for the in�ravements in this project, and W�S, Resolution No. 55 - 1993 received the Preliminary IIzgineeririg Report arid set a public hearing for the impravements in this project, and W�.S, a public hearing was held on August 16, 1993, regarding this project, ar�ci WI�REP,�S, Resolution No. -1993 ordered the itt�i�avement and final plans aryd specifications and estimates of cost and amer�ded Street Im�ravement Project No. ST. 1993 - 1&2 by adding 7th Street. NOw Tf��ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of F�idley, Anoka County, Minnesota as follaws: 1. That the following impravements proposed by Council Resolution No. 54 -1993 are hereby orciered to be effected and campleted as soon as reasonably possible, to- wit: Street improvements, including gradiizg, stabilized base, hot mi�c bittnninous mat, concrete curb and gutter, stonn sewer system, landscapirig, and other facilities located as follaws: 7th Stxeet firoai Madison tA 900 feet west That the work ixzvolved in said in�rovements as listed above shall hereafter be designated as: 7TH STRE�P FIi(J�i I�DI9�T TO 900 FEET WEST 2. The plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works Depaz'tment for such improvements and each of them pursuant to the Council resolutions heretofore adopted, a copy of which plans and specifications are hereto attached and made a part thereof, are hereby approved arid shall be filed with City Clerk. �e Public Works Director shall a000n�irigly include this work with the 1993 street reconstruction program. P�SSID AI�ID ADOFi�D BY T!� CITY QOUNCIL OF Tf� CITY OF FRIDLEY TfIIS 13TIi LIAY OF SEFPII�II2, 1993. ATl'E'S�I': WILLIAM A. C��MPA - CI'TY CIg2K WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR 31 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Eng!neering Sexe� tVale� �Parks Siree:s ti1ainten�nce MEMORANDUM William W. Bums, City Manager � I". � � John G. Flora, Public Works Director Scott Erickson, Asst Public Works Director�� September 13, 1993 PW93-323 Street Improvement Project 1993-1&2: Change Order No. 1 Additional work is required regarding the street reconstrucrion projects. The majority of the e�rtra work is related to the reconstruction of a section of 7th Street west of Madison Street and a section of Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive. The reconstruction of 7t: improvement project. T] concrete curb and gutter work is $60,000. i Street will be performed in conjunction with the 1993 street e reconstruction consists of minor widening, the installation of and a bituminous overlay. The estimated cost to perform this The reconstruction of Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive will also be performed in conjunction with the 1993 street improvement project. The reconstruction consists of minor widening, the installation of concrete curb and gutter and a bituminous overlay. The estunated cost to perform this work is $30,000. During the reconstruction of Polk Street, we encountered very poor soils in that area. In order to bridge the poor soils, it was necessary to install fabric and additional base material for the street section. The cost to perfortn this work is $6,200. The total amount of this change order is $107,240. It is recommended that Council approve Change Order No. 1 of Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1993-1&2. SE/JGF:cz Attachment 32 ,� �:'�. .. ,� CITY OF FRIDLEY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDtEY, MN 55432 September 13, 1993 Northwest Asphalt 1450 County Road 18 Shakopee, MN 55379 SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1, 1993 St�eet Improvement, Project No. ST. 1993-1&2 Gentlemen: You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the 1993. Stre�t.Im�rQV�ment Project No. ST. 1993-1&2 by adding the following work: Addition: Item Location Part Common excavation Monroe- A 6 in. Gate vaives Alden Way wtrmn P 12" RCP pipe apron w/trash guard Fire Train Ctr M Grouted rip-rap MLB Pk Lot Cable Crete Fire Train Ctr M Hydrant extensions Regis Dr & Brookview BG Valve box extensions Regis Or & Brookview BG Saw-cut concrete pave. Regis Ln & 53rd �C Geotextile fabric Polk St C Common excavation Polk St C Granular borrow Polk St N Turn arrows 69th overlay 7th Street Hathaway �n TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS: Quant" 190 cy 2 ea 2 ea 40 cy 340 sq ft 4.5 If 4.5 Ib 400 If 1,000 sy 400 cy 400 cy 2 ea R NTE S NTE Price $ 5.00 $ 405.00 725.00 2,800.00 10.00 120.00 100.00 4.10 1.00 5.00 8.00 200.00 Amount 950.00 810.00 1,450.00 1-0�(1J:()!: 3,400.00 540.00 450.00 1,640.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 3,200.00 400.00 .• ��� •• • ��• �• TOTAL ADDITlONS S io7,240.00 Original Contract Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 902,467.32 Contract Additions - Change Order _.� p7,240.00 No.1 .......... ........................ REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �1.009,707.32 32A Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Page 2 Change Order No. 1 September 13, 1993 Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, on the 13th day of September, 1993. Prepared by Checked by �� .- , %' � � . Flora, P.E. ' ector of Public Works Approved and accepted this day of 1993 by NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC. Thomas Kenney, Project Coordinator Approved and accepted this day of , 1993 by CITY OF FRIDLEY Wiiliam J. Nee, Mayor William W. Burns, City Manager � I) � J, � 66fh AVE. J '� �� �� _ _ � Rice (I II _ w. Z - W ,h , � U '�J ' � � �� CREEK��� '� 7TH STREET & � �, � N N PAND(`°" W � veR' HATHAWAY LN IMPROVEMENT N J��"��" ENNA�►O,y 'P r*� �/ � �'!'/1 Stis � I 1►��LJUIIIIII� llr II ��C,,(;etk � � �, v'J c� _ W X Z = N 0 Z Z � 3 � � 4 IY yj _.:J �-. ,�; _ .: � _ Q Z r 1-:`;�gn Scnco� N',.^r tn N � � :�.i 2 y ; '.: � H LIriLEW 0 .' H t7 z; c n�^ ,.O } cn O-- "_'-� � : � 59t N �iE�_^o 59th�n ; � N. E. _ � �,-'•� � � j n cn � :.,� � GOLO Z � I I 3 �:'":: TER. <, i� ._ = L`�.�4I �' '""I th A��� � PaK � CREEK P � 53rd �"' t~i> AVE. w Q Z ,� U Z � w i Z � a U — � N. E. m ,..::. ,��n � . �, �. �f :,� ; V '�F• �a W :.;•: TRp�� 'QF Q � o�: �LpG�ER y � 4 � .•:. C R �. . Fi�i:: : • . _ < � � -- _� _� i Q Eng+neenng Sewer Waler Parks Slreets Maintenance MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �,� �� FROM: John G. Flora, �Public Works Director �� �lyde V. Moravetz, Engineering Assistant DATE: September 13, 1993 PW93-321 SUBJECT: Resolutions Establishing and Revoking _Certain Streets on our MSAS System The City Council has preliminarily approved the attached revocations and designations of the Fridley State Aid System. Attached are two resolutions with a map illustrating names and locations of the streets in question. Recommend Council approval of resolutions establishing and revoking certain streets on our MSAS system. CVM/JGF:cz Attachments 33 a � � �� , �� � ' Cn..<n � .e .. _. + �o..n.� e cu,:�. P= Precinct � r.,i��o.i e.u�..y. � i/ '?� ro... •o ro.��orn�. • s��«� :i:r A-0K tc4ael Aq���� �r.;,;� a..a. k..d �.,,, , = : ; : S Ar(E . . . 1 .�.w_. .....""� ..."'"'."_"..." '"" ���� .��'��I��JJU .SM�NO 1111tE� •�11K ..5��.......' P ��— — '� �i=. • ..�.. .... � �~L•a � ' u � ~ ` ^ �•, ...... ��..« .�r� u. ' �-1 .+ � .. \\�` - - �• <�.c . y y ........ . _� . •I � . \i\ �+ ' ' ' '�:: Y� �� . rN. .... i \\ \1 _ i ? � �'aaw.. «. � � �' ` �� � I ...... � O Q '_'!LLS �: i: r.... � � 1• iwo ! O� 00 :!� Y� �i � ', � � -?•-' � �a.� - p�u�YV I��° � t-•...,.L•� � �% .I -- -- �--ra+wc_-- ...... ° Y { i-�.-- � t ! �' � : .1�5 eeeuuu � `°�a',.���ai' =-- „ ` � � 1� ^ � ' _ _ �i �� ,.. �a/ � .��. _ i / Q`^ * - E� a� 9� -y = .. i . 1 � c ... ; _. _ �_ �� `>.: ..1� ---- � .. .,.. . � ;; — �� ;; � � � �-- .. �; : �a J / qTr _ 1 l � � � I ...... .. ' ...«. ......... � .... ..... - /•' � i' co..t� a. � I ... , .... - .� J• � - ' -- '- -- -- -- -- -- -- - �. I1: ioo - : � .. _ '' � /!�� - � . �. n o q 'di7t ... �' - _ / �-� I" �1.. �' �. � a •) ^ o IOCRE 1A11[ /� � � � �j� J.�''i.�.^.i� %�,,; ,.9 � ....., n � �II� c ° .'� a ✓ 4r'.' � - \ - _ ` • � � i 1 ��� n � � ` •� . � . 4 � G. y > �' �, 1 '1�'SJ'�'J•, J �-�,^^ r. D �.i ,-■,, L o ' •`\\ \\ //_ >Pc�� ao r--� . i r� J.� �. ,� J � c, o 0 0 _�.. .�: 7 J �}y "� G' O C e e � � �1�'�'�'.�"J.)'�� � � C` \\ � :.../ i! :)'� n ^ � J � o : q �� � ......... _ ....._... ... ' . � ;; ��, � nn.s.�.�. ���oca�-�oN�,;;� ��^:� . . ii c �i ..�+ � or � f.'s . C�Jo .� ..�� ��_ 1� .� �. a I s�"'� •_�`+• � _. };i 4 �I � � I �t' � ; � �-- •�, —, i �, �.cr-•-�,.� '� =��L�0��0� � ,� �� - � I�+ ) �� .�i �— ��,u._.• � ,� C ``� � t, �; � �"�i c-a c� a- �� � c;., ,� r � �Q: :.0_ :�.: ,� "i; I ��y' : " � � � , " i' c ° ;� ^ / . I i o � G v(,�'i:.�� '� ;� �� �, /�< < �� J,��, y� �. f` �,� � �j ,•/ J � ,�. �� t � i ii ! II i��' '/ �� i `� �I i: � . .� O. V J �'. a e , t r j � ° i � i i. � V;,.j .> , f ' �� ., �� 1� - -�,.•c: °� : .� � ;; ;I�I ,/ M.S.A.S. DESIGNATIQN J 'I I _ � i - _ �!I ....�`' ...._ c �4�� '� lS�s.i _. ..... � � �! � - � � -= = L~ = _J ^a+.w..w ,,,.�:� � �..� - � ` ° ? w�.0 I � �'�:: � "�— ' IS } ... .�.. ��� ;�� � _ ��. �,; � - � _�___: ... �� � ,- l; �� , -��� ��.; � . _ �: �, . _ ;; _ � n _ W�..�. �. ., _.. . � � � �. � �_ �;. �; __...... � 4 ��� � - 1 _ � ..��,. � y :s,7� � . = i - -II II - i i ' i �O�D � • \ � _ •1 � � � . ii . . � S \ .. � � 11 .... , � I . � .. g �� ° � g .� :� � a � : ,: � � _ ,: - _ : _ ,,, � �� . _ �: � p rt• ._.. _. � L•;� � y' � r' : 1 , � • , � t . ii `Q� i C L f� �'� �Ii r1 y1=� ry'M .. ' •�' - � !"` `rr �� """',, ; ;�i •• •� a.... :j���jl.:ia . - � .•t� *y . ��y r� �: . i �r i . .�...... . ^ . I ...... o ' � - r• r � � .. T• r *r 1 — u .. c; irt..r._ _lTi, D ... ....... J'" �,' � � t _.._.. � r a� -ti..�r•'��t� � �.�� -� -'� � � � "�- -� - -.. r iA � ti � i � ��.. . F � C�i i d _ .-_�: ..� �.. _y'... ��:4 � V + � � � ? � :-Ft v.��� =� �.i ��_ U �" i A K � � ., �� S ..... . ; ,1 , a - -� :'� �. -;� �. Q�, , ' i; �+ � ^- _ � ,1�.: O � C a'� r % `' _ � � ,i � . ;;;� __.._ :��.. ;:,�;-- M� � � ,f�v , _:..-. --- 1 i� �' , . � '.L�: . �� ri�. �I. / q y •1•I�C: , ,' � . ..:.�� � -� N' � ; ° �, t _ � �� ��`^� �,u,� � : 1'� �.. � � N � � .9�:11 �� � ,,l l.� � n`.�.���9� „ � "' i 1���;�,;�"'��';�;��,,,,�; �:���,.., , � - i � a � ,,;;,,, , �.,.,.,�-:,_ „ � :�������„ ,,,,,;�{� r�;_��a:L,._: � ,r ' . i,�;��i�i����i��i5 .ty . � .��Jc.o { � i . � � : � i `-' , '';��' ��i�� �i� ii = �( fp)'�'?-�, � '��,�'�';'���' ;1����.,7.��.��. •.00l� - , y1 ���^I�� . i � '�, �ii ��'ni �i�'��i - �`_Y �' ,r-=..... ��; ��� �-� i . �� 3,� �, �� ; ___ _ --;. .�;: .,,, `c� �� I �l-;�; �_1_ ! � �'- -=—�1 _ ;' ''�' '�i��= � �' —,, , �-�---7� , � i ;Ai i _ , '"�� �: RE90I�17.'I�i Pb. - 1993 I2E80i,V1'IQDj F_�'i7lRT.T$f�ij(` MOIdICIPi�j� STATE AID STREE'I'$ WF�RE�S, it appears to the City Council of the City of Fridley that the street hereinafter described stiould be desiqnated as a Municipal State Aid Streets under provisions of Minnesota Iaws of 1967, Chapter 162. Nl7W, T�ORE, BE IT RE90LVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, County of Anoka, that the street described as follaws, to wit: Ter�n�ni Miles Squire Drive - Rice Creek �1 to C�melot In .06 Camelot Iane - Arthur St to Squire Dr .10 Stinson Boulevazd - 73�1 Ave to Osborne Rd (1/2 Fridley, 1/2 Mounds View) .23 .46 TOTAL MSAS DESIGNiP,TION R�QiJES'T .39 be and hereby is established, located and desiqnated a Municipal State Aid Street of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of M:i.nne.sota Department of Transportation. B�E IT FURTt�ft RE.90LVED, that the City Clexk is hereby authorized and directed to fozwan3 two (2) certified oc�ies of this Resolution to the C�rnnissioner of Hiqhways for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said street that the same be constructed, improved, and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of the City of Fridley, to be rnutibered and ]azawn as a Municipal State Aid Street as established by the State. PASSID AI�ID ADOPTID BY � CITY C�TJi�CIL OF � CITY OF FRID?�Y �ff3 13'i'ii LIAY OF SEPPII�ER, 1993. ATl'EST: WIL�L,IAM A. Cg�MPA - CITY CLEE2K 33B WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR RE90LT]TI@1 1�U. - 1993 RE,SOI�L)TION REVnImJG MtJi�TICIPAL S'i'ATE AID S7.�tE�'i5 W�S, it is evident to the City Council of the City of Fridley that the streets hex-ein referenced should be revoked as Municipal State Aid Streets under provisions of Mirinesota Iaws. 1�UW, Ti�REF�ORE, BE IT RE90LVID by the City Cotuzcil of the City of FYidley, County of Anoka, that the streets described as follaws, to wit: Control Section Segm�azt Termini Mi1es 336 005 Arthur Street - Rice Creek Rd to Ca�m�lot Ln .06 302 010, 015 61st Avenue - East River Rd to N1ain St. & 020 .23 • • • ��� � y. .29 be and hereby are revoked as Municipal State Aid Streets of said City subject to the appraval of the C.ommissioner of Minnesota Depart�xit of Transportation. HE IT FURTf�R RF,SOLVID, that the City Clerk i.s hereby authorized and clirected to fo��l two (2) certified copies of this Resolution to the Cc�nunissioner of the Minnesota Degartme.nt of Transportation for his appraval of the revocation of said Municipal State Aid Streets. PASSID APID ADOPI�D BY � CITY 0.�IIiV�CIL OF TI� CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTII��ER, 1993. : YY�.�1'�1 i�JILLIAM A. C��MPA - CITY CIII2K 34 WII�SANI J. NEE - MAYOR E,^g+neenng Seue� LVale• ParKs ISlrcets ,h1aintenance � MEMORANDUM , TO: William W. Burns, Ci Mana er � PW93-340 � � g y�a FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director DATE: September 8, 1993 SUBJECT: Locke Park Filter Plant In the 1993 budget, we had identified a Locke Park filter plant rehab project at an estimated cost of $750,000. We are currently going out with the plans and specifications for bid. The current estimate for the project is $630,000. In the bid, we are identifying some alternative contract items: an air wash system $10,000, office partition $8,000, and synthetic greensand media $70,000. By implementing these alternative deductions, the estimate would be $542,000. I recommend we advertise the project and review the prices and make a decision on the improvement once the bids have been opened. JGF:cz 35 �� . RE50LITi'I�T I�. - 1993 RE.SOI�Lfl'ION AU1�bDRIZING ADVII2TISII�lP OF BID6 FOR Ti� IDCKE PARK FILTER PIANP REPAIR, PIif�TF7LT PU. 240 WI�I2�S, the irxke Park sarid filters have bee,n c]amaged and are no longer functionirig properly, and �,s, Maier Stewart & A.ssociates (MSA) has been retained to Prepare Plans and specifications for the repair ar�d upgrade of the Ir�cke Fark filtet.�s, ar�ci �i8, the 1993 budget has identified a capital i�mvement of $725, 000 for the IACke Park filter plant repair, and W�, the TCAAP Interconnect project incorporates a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition system which is to be installed in the L�ocke Park filter plant, arxl �, MSA has ao�npleted the plans for the IACke Park filtex plant regair, and W�, it is prudent to repair the facility and 000niinate the constxuction projects within the facility at the same time. I�7F1, Tl�REF'ORE, 8E IT 1�90LVED TI�iT, the City Council of the City of F�idley, Anoka County, Minnesota, the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, is authorized to advertise for bids for the Irxke Park Filter Plant Repair project No. 240. PASSID AAID ADOPTID BY TI� CITY C7OUNCIL OF R� CITY OF Fi2IDLEY TIiIS 13Z�i I]AY OF �F���, 1993. � WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLEE2K 35B WILISAM J. NEE - MAYOR E��a�neer, i� Sewe� �.v�ie� ParKs ISlrec,_ 4'IaVnter�rce MEMORANDUM TO: Wilham W. Burns, City Manager � �� FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director DATE: September 13, 1993 SUBJECT: Stream Bed and Bank Erosion Control Project PW93-284 In July, 1992, the City forwarded a project to the Rice Creek Watershed District dealing with the stream bed and bank erosion control project in the 400 block of Rice Creek Terrace. The City was involved in that project because of the storm sewer outlet into Rice Creek at that location. Based upon the projected costs, the City at that tune indicated support of funding $5,000 for the rip-rap work and a new end piece for the storm sewer culvert. Bids have -been received for the project. The Board of Water and Soil Resources is granting $29,500, the Rice Creek Watershed District is funding $14,500, leaving a$16,000 amount to be funded by the five residents and the City of Fridley. Based upon our Storm Water Policy, we can match the residents participation or $8,000. The bids result in a$3,000 increase to the amounts previously noted. As a means of removing the sediment occurring in Rice Creek and protecting the properties in this area, I recommend the City Council authorize an additional $3,000 for a total of $8,000 for the Kaufhold project on the 400 block of Rice Creek Terrace. Funds for this project are available in the storm water utility contingency. JGF:cz 36 � . �.. � . ... : . — � - : ,;�� -- � . _ . - _ -. , , „ . - . - �, ; :. � cV ' �,_- e �. y� � —��T-- I ' i ` m 'a ^' ''� �/..''• '�N �*�:�;.eyc�tZ; ��•l � `�`' -:. ; . � T � .. � � N � '.. � �,� �1� '� 3, , N� � i ' ;zZ� '• C�. . .; � ; �r . c._ � 'N ; ' i�q � � � �rC7t "i . `` \ i � t: � N ; .i . '�OSO � _._. •� z '�. w � a _ .' _ �1 � _.;, ` - r � } : � ^ i ��� ' N p M e�. � " : e i S �u �h� �,` �D �� 11' �� •,S ' ` N �Y Y / � � v c� � • � ��� »� 1 K b � � •'n . '1 � • ' �b ��`��. . � ± - � 1 i � �, R-, =` , = b�' ; ` • ` ° ^ ` ,,,, �N . o, �' i� � ^� A ` 3 ���~•+� :.a - yN _ •''� h 7' f t � ^ � - � � � �—^ '�'� ,t s � t.�i N •.�51 1 ` �� M � N + � . .• � '? ,Sf! '�!,} ° �Y. :� � + t<1 'ir � � : ' � $ � S J �'+y ' i'� 1 �� �. �i �/�j► : .� ? . �, .t N -� . •. �.:..� N019NIH dM ° a - � : o q : r ti � � � `c� 'ta� + •i f:S"�•I `' 1 # � : " :.,�,r.. � ,� • � o „'� .f •�r� ...,. �'. ` �.� M . `' ��� `` , _ o' �t%� ,` I^ ' . �, •. ` S � � c � � a1 ��� . ° i' ' � ; _ ` J' �'� � � " � � • t! � w - � /J � . � / �� �e e • � �` • � � � �/ ° �t:,{•' ~ �' � Y4 � ` � / N ` .� � ` �t :� j � i \ � y,� � .:-�• ^� ° „, � � N ;,Q � �� � , h : 1 � [y, `l :� ` � , .` ` 1 � � ' O� � � � ♦ ' �a / ��,~} °f.► , ,'Jt%b . `�•• � tn J •:+• +� � `� �p . ; G > �� 4 j r \ . + Y.. � ti�� � _l 1 V � b �h ; � ` � .�`°`' ; 1 S r., i. ' _ � / '�J��` � ' � ji s:r � . / � � w e � ..- ,., z.•� 1 N � m � � � ' �`r � � ; � ;. i . _ �� ••'�� �,__� -�y �, � � � : 0 J .f � 2 �' � -l' — .. . _ $ � � : . �,� . - & = � �� \s ..! _.. {-•--` , �� ��� �. � __j' — . -- -, '%. / �r•r-etE- � �°, �,. --- - --- •,i,� � + .: �7�` . r. t .<,, 3 ` � ,;� ,.�f ....; ��,° � r �` � � :�^.� / y�/J er - � ,> r � J � ' . \ ��� � `y� �.":��' 'i (���.� � � ,�+ � �� 0 � � • �' , � . \� ''/ y `� ' :' � ` - ' � `_�/ 2 a /' ' � � \ �'i �i 4i.-• ��s_ �. {� �D ♦ A. � ':.;; v` =� �, �`> 3�� .�. . �Y �.y ` � �; t1►\\ � I � � �. /� � . � �`�� ' * 'r� l,�. ;i" • i'�� e" e • er. ♦ � ^�.' -` ,i �_ �� `�!� i ./i, �` I y c�� .�'� ,, � N y. i \ A _ i ` , �,�, ��'( � .� ' 4 / � W � . �' V •� +.- �. _ __ . ;• �c �' ... ..��'''iii ya. Z Qj �� r' e � �:7 �� � ,'�' �^a,•f •�� �� �h ! Z � !d:O ...� �t� �. v '"y ; �;t' ` e' ► . � ,.�� .` . , ' � �� r' I ^\ ti .^`` � , � ��%� tai : 1 f = ��' �'y � ��' `V� % ' � � •� - � � � � � � '.n �J' �. / ♦��"_/��� ` ,,�� -.a• � �D Q t! • ♦ � �' •• . ��1 i , r .� • � � t � � -� � ♦ e. � �. � . - � � � N ` � ...•:S . �% - % r ' � � � h ' , �. � - �.II, i z .� +. • 5 ^ ,� ' ��'��y.se � -"--s- ~ :f � i: :fl . ` .'' � ♦ ��, an.:n o � � Y - =%-� � ` . r ;�r' �+7�,.ir. � � — s _ ^�' , � r i ? :o .:.• ' ,. ,.,, '- � �7' � � .♦ s' � � ,.'1S H19� " b �� . �o � :K�;.rI:�:::.� - ����. y ••�•. �.: , �� ,� ; , `'1•' � .si.•ti J " �, 3^" +.- "• "' -�i � . .[.� � v�j, s'z �^ � � o x � t h ., ar ? • � � � � �y v.. <} . �i':;�.: � "i�t..e[:, -� �� „a O q ;^ _ N /►.1 �I n ; J • e � +.o V : �n. i f .r�' /� .� ,V � ^ : 1 � V f/ / •�,� .S • _ � i •�j „t ♦rs• . i e s.�ss .t � //�/ - �i .� ..1 `� t ai a=•"l 1���` � ' Vii .� (p + .Cd� �� f . �'� 'S�' \ .j`' ' Q ', an '� � \ � `_ ` N + � �i- ' �,/�� � � a�,r •� � � .w' ,,' ' . �� t ` r�,,, •fr r� � �� °'�: �I .i � � v " ti .. �� : 4 J - ': � +�.,.. -^ J, y^Y ' f i t� ; V c. �''1 / . V J• .. � n , � . . . z at r! .a . a. ii'X'r �0' .�i ' ~ •{� � '.�/' `'� e ���'4. �i . �� tt , re � , .y S' . /� �7 . 1 / L / . •�n,'Q/\�O, X33li�: ..,. i«xi '':i`Y.'•^ � \ �h' I y N �c . , ��n� / ''�� �J:ii° /� �) �� i � �// '� 1 n a . . �ry J'Q��.,t�� t Y ! i�� i > �.� - - ' •- :3 . ,. ,, _ � 1, l` _�r ; s - . . Q c. I c • � 4l. a �h•.�•_ �6 � ' J � y �..f �- ���� � � � M •i • a - _ � '- �l. N ' • � •� / , � � I � � : O • :, �' �i `x(�]/ 1��ti_ � �' til • � 1 ' . v t � oE eB � •/ :I � � i{ }O/ `x LS���a� � � � • O 1. `� :: � oJ • ` � , � ' � �i�� ;:t� �i� ' �s �� � • �: �;j � � �� •3 •N �'1S Hl� e y t • N �p- • � ,,.� � 7 � � � t' �i 1 /� �h � . •�� t[ t s� a ��� o �s � ir�- � � : la t- s�s� ,_ �• _ N M � 4 V , n � • ' C • •.� J r :,� f/ �iQO�+ o �: . �: ._�� s,en r� , se re �t se rs a?'�� .S �� ' . . ; � ni�► _ "_"__ �_' '_� '" � cY�� � _. ar �i _ . . •f.:� -�-+ Ai!n.^s- 7�fri- � - - ' � ,�, � �� � - - - - -� -- - - - - - -- - � - - - -' - - --';—,---- �-- —;- - --- �----�---�—��., �.8,...y ~ �� � �NflN1 31 ��; ' (ZN ' MH .. - �__' r..-_—,_' _ N , ` Z ari �+vK"vS � : � _ __ : � Y; � � :.:: ---------------•------ •�-^- � �-^ --7�ef77 �T� •'�?�Intl� .. ;` i' ` i +r . i ti �. � �° 7o:ry-uas-"-:�� : • . ' . ... ._`.��.� �.' ; � , '. 'f �� 41 L � } •f � . � a3s ^ . _ ,— 'f + . � t'\ : ,�, 4 t _ `�:: . „� � ; � _ yt� vi .us�... � +.^:r..` _ �r �� ' � s-','�+�' •• �n•r�'� : f. � V � I' '. � � �� . , y t _� " ' � ; �N� •`, � •N � • ° _' ,i- :; � N '� � 3 i `.s.: _ . t i N g .: _ . V' •,�t . N A K fyst � t a • S ' \ Z - > ✓ y � �� � , \i l� �•� • 04�.1 � �E � ;_ �� ' . ; •; ..{u�� `^ � ' �1,: e�='�x� .:P N . � � ;�}• � + : � ' j � �� r �,� ��.� � = :i N N a k : a 1� ,� ' \ �' • ��� ` , r• �' a'.. ' !`-' � � `` d M ,�= ,�� � ' o -�, � . �. ; �, - . ;,.,' '� ' � a a N1 y +'� ^1 �` Li .i M?��' � 1 �J r: i '_ 'S�` � ,'�� � �n'� �� L` �n�P%. .+. r � 1r� ��.i'� _ _ ' \ - a • ��`'� O , r r� u,��' S. ' F+ � V � _ �� � ) ; .. � :�:. . - ` \/ a t�. �; : � f. - aj • p,�, �;���. -. s�-'� I / � ` �O l ♦ ` � i.i �/�� 4� � � ) �'+��_ �� � �� /�'• Q` • ,a. � � �1 - J� ; � � k� ' .. ' :'vy'•,c. }y9 /r' v� � �'k.t �' >�` 7' '— .. y � '.ti V� ' � , '• � : � ts iF �.: i, =N"'i_�'Z � �-, �- �- �Z t � ~ .'���� y i �v' ��'' ,`ay.t� � - � - ;, ,, � .�.�V - .j,��,' d, ' �� • .�F.�: . � ... , . . .. . , . . „. . ,. -.. ar--- i� 1. , �- �� > a L� L'��+.-- -`'>-J �Engineering y Sewer � �C Water � � O Parks O 3 Streets � V Maintenance U_ W —� � m O� a � MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Bur� , City Manager ' PW93-239 FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director DATE: July 1, 1993 SUBJECT: Stream Bed and Bank Erosion Project On June 30, 1993 I attended a meeting with representatives of the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District, the Rice Creek Watershed District and residents of Rice Creek Terrace regarding the stream bank e�osion project on the 400 block of Rice Creek Terrace. This project consists of five residents who submitted a project to #he Rice Creek Watershed District Stream Bed Erosion Control Program in 1992. The current project estimate is $60,000. The Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District has obtained a grant of $29,500. It is proposed that the Rice Creek Watershed District will be contributing $14,500, leaving $16,000 for the residents. The City had previously agreed to contribute $5,000 to the project in conjunction with our storm water policy and the fact that we have a culvert in deteriorating condition, which is within the project. I expect the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District will submit the project for approval and request the City and property owners to increase their participation by another �3,000 for a total of $8,000. This project is consistent with the Gity and the Rice Creek Watershed District policies, and I recommend the Council consider this request favorably. Upon receipt of the formal notice, I will add this to the appropriate Councii agenda. JGF:cz .: / � cmr0� FRlDLEY Engineering Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager FROM: John G. Fiora, Public Works Director DATE: September 13, 1993 SUBJECT: Rice Creek Projects PW93-335 Over the past few years, the Rice Creek Watershed District has been activeiy engaged in a stream bed and bank stabiliza#ion program. In that process, we have identified a total of eight projects on Rice Creek within the City of Fridley. Project No. 1 was a bank stabilization and diversion cost of $30,000. The City contributed $1,000 for that project. Project No. 2 was the removal of the old dam structure and adjustment of the creek alignment. This was a$65,000 joint project between the Rice Creek Watershed District and the DNR. Project No. 3 was a stream bank erosion project and creek alignment at $21,000. The City contributed $3,450. Project No. 4(900 area) was a stream bank erosion contro! project at $21,000. The City contributed $6,000. Project No. 5(600 area) this is the most recent project that we have received and is estimated on the high side of $62,000 with a City participation of $15,000. Project No. 6(500 area) is the largest stream bank project to date and is estimated at $200,000 with the City's contribution based upon that figure of $40,000. Project No. 7(300 area) is the Kaufold project at $60,000 with a City contribution of $8,�0. In addition, the District has participated with the County in the stream bank project at Manomen Park. JG F: cz 36C / � C.IIYOF FitlDLEY � ��• WF�. H ��C �� ' xN �(] '�M Vf� W��GU (� W � x� ��� a« aa o • w y u � �� ���... W 6�.` W � z � ' , �� � � j � L h Y �u / �� �/ � V � 0 m d U y J �i_ �. � :� � � G O S Q � � � u� :/ z w O M W a � r w � < < J � � Q" _ - �2 � 3 h W V 2 W 0 � � O O J 4 i' � �� a.�D ' � J W h r< r m � �j/ �1 �j � li 1 y8� 9 /�BO`2r ./ / � �� �l �1�� B' 9 t > oi� � �'9p..ti-� a x � po UL' � �II I � � 19.�ti . ;g\� �\ j ° • 1 \Z.N1 �i � J � 11 1 �� � .� Y w J Z O J � d LL w oW � � r J �, � 9 �$ ,i � /� `, � .\ � \ Y Q O t� 3 r ' ' , ' I • ` / J.�� � , � i� / . � / . � y / r -� � -� / / fl / I � o, _ �ysv.�'- . , J; c � j ,ti. / _ _ _ :�� �; / �g•� �� - -- J � � — ,o� !J �i % � � Ic'!� � % , . � / / -- f z / l` . / J / J i � � � O �� i v� .` }- ! �C � % % v � �X ' �• -j o�.. ,�o ,j z�o n� � Q . VF-� Z� Z Wi.. — r a � i e � z o�_ -- ' X O � W !�- ` ID tJ \ .9 �, � � J���, �' �-- � ,� ,t — � `� �6 ,�. • � ��r—� `\ ���: � \� . \ � ��l �•� � � � � :�. ^ �, , C � � k Q� �a �- -�-�.... \'�� T � � � .\ ��7 \ � � i ?'�� � ��� `,\ � �'2E �l \� ° ' - - v O s / � O 1 2b _ Q• � �£+�$ . �o \ �� Ccp �\\ � ``•` �` .� z� 8 �� '�h£ � � y �,. a � . + 2 W 2 �^ `� � � $ O 3 a H � x ) N CL Cf .oi 'u m , �'`�_ ' N �(• � l '� • / �7 't 0 � 1 � t � 36D � � �� O m �Ek ti A �C$r w W p V C �a� O a�� E O H 4 W Uq6 o �ac z f. a : Ks: wz: oc UEti �wt av�c �t oc aWi �mi N� O i qOi tt t-t . �H: O W + U v7 ' i� ` ;�: , � , I\ W v > � I W , N �/ : � �� � -_ _� :; , _ `�i �.`� <� �. ' ,. RCVI/D PROJECTS SPRING LAKE O _ I �� �� ��- 65 p F' I � 75th AVE Z W K m W z > �.�� j�. ..��� ; r� : - s�sr � � PARK :� 1. BRIC.-+ADOON PL. N.E. 2 T_H. 65 WEST SERVICE DP � John EnCkso . . . ^ ��� 11 ` . .S riRg.^ 108 �. .. 'L ok� Fc . •:�;:i•.:;::;: ::: - •.• .• .R -r• `OR. �� 5 •..Q;: ... .... •• - 2W � p dcrest � I � Z � �� ientary Z�.__ � 7 F� W AVE. N. E. 0 rn j � > T6th •, AVE. � Troiler �*-21� W a z COUft z � TSfh A . N. � FlRESiDE DR. ' � �' � � � v~i (Private) Z � ���^:; -'x 73rd � Locke ;;^;�" -:'�.:',} �fl�:{ BI'�?. '-�i'.,� �.i`f.,- _7.- � yl+y� J'J,•,�• `!~• `i.l�. %,.: „ . . � .I-: 'r pJ� ��:J ��� � ~���� r}.Y tE�l<�'t� � . : J:, `-��' .t.i� VOORA �.•'Y`�. WN � ��� � �,Q '�< 9 '' �� v v�h o 68t� AV£. .. , �,"j � ,c . . � �, �p / � ^~ � a Z V II � � :c['�� O O � ierrac . �t%'`r.� tn � F- � 7 f h AVE- K a N�9 -0VE �. 1,,.. 66th AVE. N.E. � CLOVER 't:,teac ,,,� , Hayes r 66th..:�.' ,- C.r.�:-zn o� cnnsi Eiemen�a,v PL. MISSISSIPPI �� �i N Cl� ' 'iCrc�,ii, U:�.:c: .+.,... _ �. _ ^ :� > ' -.: i.,! `'� , o BENNETT�-�' p�R Z � � ' :> . , z f- v�i J FOURMI ES � z w x 64 th = o 0 o r � � laJ = tn � U z ? � �RY R N E Z a W a � � w � 63rd ����1 � !i AV�. N�E. m m s� v o >�„•- w =iannery— • � i;� j%� � J W ANONDAGO ST :-� f- J ►- ►- cn 73 1/2 AV E i ? 731/2 AVE. ; • Q a � rJ �AVE� w = N. E. � 2 72�d qy � � 1'� _ � �n �.��., �rari �::Trc; -.- ," i v 19 , O�!AN Vci;�sQcr� a rO�PQRa'(InN ORTON I�VE. 69th) IAVE. N.E. C }� ,� Ilr T 30 N � 12, 7 J- �24 W 13 I 18 R 23 � y \ AVE. N.E. (-_ � �`i ` AV E� J ,;':' .:: •: pZ,° �, tn v� N � } p.',eE�3 unitar �� 66 �h 66th A •N' � 66 th .Wj >-�. �> - Cnurc. � � Y Q v CREEKPp'�K Q Z 1 x o j ,� �p,. � o n'� a� 0 oao J a ST a a � � C � O � N V DA NA C� AVE.�a' o; � 64th AVE. N. E. � °' o �' CAMEL oT s `Q W,� � �" 0. 6 RICE CREEK � � 6 3r r��� �� �---1 �--_ _1 t i Engineering Sewer Water Parks Streets Maintenance MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager ��. PW93-322 (� � FROM: John G. Flora,`Public Works Director DATE: September 13, 1993 SUBJECT: Advertise for 1994 Sidewalk Snowplow Lease/Purchase Proposal During the 1994 budget discussions, the City Council approved the lease/purchase of a new sidewalk snowplow to be used this winter to clear sidewalks after snow events. The City of Fridley Public Works Department would like to advertise and award the lease purchase/agreement this fall with the frst payment due after January 1, 1994. This would, hopefully, allow delivery of the sidewalk snowplow late this fall or early winter. The specifications have been prepared and are ready to send to equipment dealers. The existing 1984 Boschung Pony sidewalk plow with a snowblower will be traded in. Proposals will be received on September 29, 1993 and a recommendation to lease/purchase a unit will be presented at the October 4, 1993 Council meeting for delivery in mid November. Recommend the City Council make a motion to authorize the advertisement for bid proposals for the lease/purchase of a new sidewalk snowplow and accessories. BN/JG F: cz 37 / � CliYOF FTi1DLEY NOTICE TO BIDDERS ONE (1) NEW SIDEWALK SNOWPLOW AND ACCESSORIES Sealed lease/purchase proposals wiil be received and publiciy opened by the City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, at the office of the Public Works Director, 6431 University Ave., NE, Fridley, MN 55432, (Tel. 572-3450), on Wednesday, the 29th day of September, 1993, at 11:00 am, for the furnishing of one (1) sidewalk snowplow and accessories. All in accordance with specifications prepared by John G. Flora, PE, Public Works Director, Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Ave NE, Fridley, MN 55432. Specifications may be examined at the office of the Public Works Director and copies may be obtained for the equipment dealer's individual use by applying to the Public Works Director. Proposals must be made on the basis of a lease/purchase for the sidewalk snowplow machine, and accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check (on a responsible bank in the State of Minnesota) or a bidder's bond made payable without condition of the City of Fridley, MN, in an amount of not less than 5 percent (5%) of the total amount ofi bid. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any informalities in any proposals received without explanation. No proposals may be withdrawn for a period of thirry (30) days. By order of the City Council of the City of Fridley, MN. Dated this 13th day of September, 1993. John G. Flora, P.E. Public Works Director Published: �ridfey Focus September 15, 1993 September 22, 1993 37A CITY OF FRIDLEY Attachment 6 Budget Detail Form Submitted by John G. Flora Budget Year 1994 � Department Division , Public Works STREET, PARKS, MECHANICS Account No. 4341 � Re�tals .lustification: Sate{{ite rental—satellite 49'er 1250 Cylinder rental Portable compressor Equip. rentals (brush 8� sod cutte�) Lease Agreement Sidewalk Snowplow TOTAL Dollar Amount Requested Inc./Dec. Over Last Year 20,290 Total Budget Requested 26,680 City Manager's Council's Recommendation Decision $5,850 Recreation Dept. 300 1,000 700 � 18,830 $26,680 37B 1. Type: 2. Usage: 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. CITY OF FFLT�► PUBLIC %URRS DEP'A�'1' tl�`I'AII�D $P�7C:I�'IG�TION3 For Diesel-P�wered Sid�ewalk Plaw (100 �) Snawblc�wer Att,a�i�mrexit V-Plaw AttaCtm�xit New latest model at time of delivery, ccanplete with R.O.P.S. approved heated cab. Equipm�nt will be u��ed to remave snow frarn sidewalks within the City of Fridley. General: The vehicle and associated equipanent shall be of rugged design and c�onstruction thLro�uc�out; feature ideal handling c.haracteristics for e�,se of operation; and be capable of operating for sustained periods under extreme weather and c�peratitlg conditions. �. - Transmission: The vehicle shall meet or exceed all applicable Federal and Mirmesota laws and regulations in force at the time of delivery, including bacxup alarm. a. Miniminn 100 HP (diesel), 4 cycle b. E�ternal disposable oil filter and fuel filter c. Gavernor setting at maxim�nn c�ontinuous manufacturers reocarnnended RPNLs d. Ccenplete engine gauges, oil pressure, water te,mperature etc. e. Magnetic drain plug f . Heavy�iuty cooling a. Hydrostatic shall be infinitely variable speed forward and reverse, with dual speed r�ange transfer case. PI�O: FYorit and rear PPO must be of sufficient capacity to. operate a snawblawer at slaw vehicle speed.s, arxi when vehicle is stationary, indep�xlently clutched from � vehicle. Axles: Steex'ing: Wheels/Tires: Axles must be of a type that will allaw all wheel drive at the operator's c�ption with differential lock front and rear. Articulating steeririg. 4�eels and tires will be high traction nuid-snow tires . 2 37C 10. Hydraulirs: Hydraulic pim� capacity shall be of sufficient volwne and pressure to operate vehicle and attachments satisfactorily even at law erigine RPMs. 11. Cab: Certified R.O.P.S. enclosed type one-man cab. Windaws should easily remave for emergenc.y exit. Bostroan su.spension type seat. Horn, heater defroster (of sufficient size to keep all windaws clear), two-speed windshield wiper, rearview mirror, sound deadening, seatbelt and shoulder belt. 12. Lights: 'Itao headliqhts, two taillights with turn signals, turn signals with 4-way flashers, bac3�up light, rear work lic�t. Amber strobe lic�t, 12V eleckric syste�n. 13 . Instnunents : Tachcenetex', hour meter, attq� meter, watex t�t�er'ature, oil pressure, any other gauges rec�ner�ded by manufacturer. All gauges shall be internally lighted. Safety shut dawn for lvw oil or high water temperature. 14. Vehicle Dimensions: 15. Turnirig Radius: 16. Brakes: The width of the vehicle is extr�mely im�ortant. Vehicles exceedir� 51" will not be considereci. Turn radius maxinnrm 12' inside diametex. Service brake on all wheels. Vehicle shall be equipped with a parkirig type brake. 17. Sexvice: Vendor shall have sold a minim�un of 25 of the units similar to the unit bid in the Minneapolis "metro" area, that are still in service. List of locations shall be pravided. 18. Hitches: � Usage: FYont: Quick disconnect for plaw/blawer connection, includixig hydraulics and lift cylinder. Rear: Category 3 with dual lift cylinders. V-Plaw V-plaw shall be of heavy-duty construction Plaw will be �sed to remwe snaw frcan sidewalks in the City of Fridley Specifications: Maxim�nn width at base 49" Maxiirnnn width at top 51" Replaceable han�ened cutting edge. Replaceable hardene�l nose edge. 3 37D Snawblawer Type: Heavy-duty industrial type hydraulic or medianically operated frean tractor specified in bid. Snawblawer must be operable when p�ash vehicle is not in motion. Sriowblawer shall meet or exc�eed all applicable Federal and Minne.sota laws an�d regulations in foroe at time of delivery. Usage: Dimensions: Specifications: Paint: 7�ao�tay Radio: Snawblawer will be u��ed to re�ve sYZaw frcea sidewa].ks in the City of FYidley. Blawer shall have a quicJc discoruzect oauplirig frce�t pawer uni.t. Snowb2awer shall not e.�cceed 51" in width. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Ztao augexs Three blade ;��ler Replaoeable inq�eller hausing Chute moust rotate a mini�taua of 270 degree,s Chute deflector hydraulically oontrolled Cutting edge must be replaceable Shear bolts must be easily ac�essable Blawer lifting controls, chute rotation control and chute deflection control must be easily controllable fn�n inside cab by operator Optional trucJc loading c.�ute shall also be provided Snowblawer shall match engine HP of push unit Calor will be selected at time of acceptance frarn st.arydard colors available frcan the manufacturer. Midland, M�odel 70-1336B, installed 8-30-93 C:\WP\STREEIS\SIDWI�.PIW 4 37E l. 2. Praposal Form , City of Fridley Diesel-Pbwered 5idewalk Plow and Attad�nnents Septe�nber 29, 1993 One diesel-pawered sidewalk plaw including freic�nt, har�dling ar�d sales tax One v plaw as specified, includirig freight, handling, and sales tax 3. One sxiowblaaer, inclt�dir�g cyptional truck loading rhute, freiqht, handling� and sales tax 4. 5. . ._ Trade-in allawance on a 1984 Bosrhung Fony sidewalk plaw, snnwblawer and angle plaw Net Cost Net Cost, (i.ncluding interest, sales ta�c, freight, haridlirig) $ divided by 3= for Janu�ary 1994 for JanuaYy 1995 for January 1996 Optional - 2-way Midlarid Radio installed 1 37F $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ The Trackless Snow Blower is a highly efficient two stage, twin auger unit that has no equal in removing snow from sidewalks. It is available in two widths, 51 inch and 70 inch. Both will accept either a sidewalk chute or a quick change truck loading chute. Many municipalities utilize both chutes with their snow blower. After clearing their sidewalks, they change to the truck loading chute to load windrowed snow from the street or from cul de sacs. In both cases the maneuverability and physical size of the MT and blower are less apt to create traffic congestion than larger snow blowers. An average loading time for the MT and snow blower is 7 yards per minute. Overall heavy duty construction includes 3/8 inch thick sideplates, a double wall impeller housing and a 15 inch diameter bearing assembly for smooth accurate chute rotation. High strength, low alloy steel augers with ice picks and a heavy duty balanced impeller, easily handle the toughest snow conditions. The snow blower is manufactured by Trackless Vehicles to ensure that the quality and service parts availability is equal to that of the MT. Positive and accurate steering of the blower in confined areas and around obstructions is due to the articulated steering of the MT. The ability to move the blower sideways by simply turning the steering wheel allows the operator to safely ap�roach any obstruction. FOR FURTHER EVALUATION A DEMONSTRAtION MAY BE ARRANGED SPECIFICATIONS: Housin_. ; 1"' wide x 38" high �vith 3/y" end plates. Augers _- 13" diameter spiral �vi;h ice picks. Impelle� := x 24" — 3 blade Impeller ':using liner. 2 piece ;-aol��ceable). Turn tat a Ball bearing. Chute �; :_:-.�r Hydraulic motor ,; c chain. Chule c;';.ior. Hydraulic cylir�,:er conirolled. Cutting �; :e�. 6° x 3/a" harden��:. ,•2e�ersible). Shear _;:; On auger drive an.: �� n P.7.0. drive. Adjust2_ ; :utting height Usin_. :�� link. Quich ;.. , a truck IoadinG c.•__ •, clear2.nce V��eiqh; ' : ; 0 Ibs. HP r:3: .: :l� 37G Truck Loadir^ Chute A Sidewalk Chute � �:,_ (3353 --:m) Q�.. , (231 1 m r v J Ei�g+neenng Sev+e� '.V�ler ParKs Slreets ".9ai�tenance MEMORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager ��• �� FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director DATE: September 13, 1993 PW93-346 SUBJECT: SCADA System Project - On Thursday, September 9, 1993, we opened the bids for the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system project. Eleven (11) firms were interested in the project. We received three bids. The low bidder was Automatic Systems with a total bid of $376,850. The Army portion of the SCADA improvements amounted to $325,000. The City requested some additional items for security and meters, which amounted to $51,850, for a total bid of $376,850. It is the Army's position that the City should fund their additional instrumentation as well as design costs. The design cost for the project amounts to $1,767.10, or a total cost of $53,617.10 for the City's items. This amount is below the 1993 budget item of $60,000 for instrumentation. Recommend the City Council receive the bids and award the contract for the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition, City project No. 259, to Automatic Systems at a cost of $376,85Q. Recommend the City Council authorize payment of $1,767.10 to Maier Stewart & Associates for the design of the City surveillance items. JGF:cz : � ��". a (i�-:U= _:. tiEF-':-9� F�'I 1Q:i� i1AI�T STEWART ASSOC. FAX N0, 7740838 / , � --- -- � ! September 10, 1993 � File: 900-000-00 h�r. John G. Flora pirector of Public �Yarks City of Fridlzy Civic Centex 6431 U�v.vessit.y A��enue NE Fridley, �!LN 55432 F. � � CONSUITING ENG�NEERS Maier Stewart & Assaciates Inc. RE; ENGiNEERING C�STS; CITY �`UNI7ED INSTRU�vIENTATION Deaz Mr_ Flora: As ybu are a�vare, the City of Fzi.dley has added some additi.onal instrumentation to the supervi.sory �ontrol and data acquisxk�on {SCADA.) s�stem project. The bid amount for khe City- added z�strumentation is $51,850. 1'he U.S. Army has indicated that the engineeri�g costs to �repare plans and spe�;iiications for the Ci.ty-added instrumentation should also be a City of Fridl�y cost. The enbineering cost related to the City-addzd instrumez�tation is as follows: lbi�ier Ste��art & Associat,�s, Ine. Kaeding and Associates 'mI'AL $ 399.10 1„j�6S•00 $1.,767.10 � The V�ater Dep�rtment's 1993 budget included $60,OOQ for instrumentakion. Th� hid price �or I�he instrumentati.on plus the engi.neering casts re�ated to the instrumentation totals $53,61.7.10, � nr appxoxiinately 10% under budget. If you h��e any questi.ons regarding thxs submittal, please �ee1 free to ca11.. Sineerely, A•iAIER STEWART & ASS�CIATNS, TNC. � •� � ,. � � � Ttzomas A. Roushar, P.E. TAR: tp a�o-i�_�.e 7959 S�OAN PLACE, SUiTE 200, ST. PAUL, MINN�SOTA 55117 812-774-6021 9800 SHElARO PARKWAY, SUfTE 1t12. MINNEAPOLIS, MtN11ESaTA 554d1 612•546-0432 • Equal Oppart�nity EmplDyer i � BiD FOR PROPOSALS SUPERVISORY CONTROL & DATA AC�UISITION (SCADA), PROJECT NO. 259 THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1993, 11:00 AM A.M. PLANHOLDER BID BOND TOTAL BID COMMENTS Automatic Systems United Fire Cas. $376,850 2400 W County Rd D 5% St Paul MN 55112 Bacon's Electric United Fire Cas $434,950 6525 Central Ave NE 5% Minneapolis MN 55432 Killmer Electric United Fire Cas. $505,072 9702 85th Ave N 5°� Maple Grove MN 55369 AutoCon, industries NO BiD 995 University Ave St Paul MN 55104 Broadcast Comunication NO BID 307 Cemarron Rd Apple Valley MN 55124 Dynamic Systems NO BID 6819 Washington Ave S Minneapolis MN 55439 Feed-Rite Controls NO BID 3000 E Hennepin Ave Minneapolis MN 55413 Instrument Control Systems NO BID 13005 16th Ave N, Suite 100 Plymouth MN 55441 Parsons Electric Co NO BID 917 5th Ave South Minneapolis MN 55404 Twin City Electric NO BID 10724 Morgan Ave S B(oomington MN 55431 Waldor Pump & Equipment NO BID 9700 Humbotdt Ave S Minneapolis MN 55431 . - i 39 ��"m',I �'vI2 COivCUF�ZENCi; bk '1'iir Ll'1'Y Lvutv�:l:� � —� �.� 0{_ , FZZJCXEY September 13, 1994 l�lt:t':Lcb:;� �pe of License: B� Approved By: USED MOTOR VEHICLE �- Minar Ford � Jerry Bostrom David Sallman � 1100 Silver Lk.Rd. . Director of Public Safety New Brig.hton, MN 55112 Wilkins Dodge Inc. Kenneth G.Evans " •" "." 2755 Long Lk.Rd. . Rosevi 11 e, ��IN 55113 � Brookdale P1otors Inc. Wm. Bartram " " " ." b121 8rooklyn Blvd. Brooklyn Center, h1N 55429 _ Maaco Auto Painting & Leffel Inc. " " " Auto Bodyworks � � 148 Osborrie Rd. N.E. Fri dl ey, f�IN 55432 - TEMPORARY FOOD Grocery Hut Ken Jedneak � 1301 h1ississippi St.N.E. � Fridley, MN 55432 TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR (2 licenses, one on 11-20-93 & one on 4-16-94) � Totino-Grace High School Greg Balego � David Sallman , 1350 Gardena Ave. Director of Public Safety Fridley, P�IN 55432 Fees: $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 �150.00 $30.00 $12Q.00 AUCTIONEER . , Totino-Grace High School Greg Balego " " " Asking fees ta 1350 Gardena Ave. be waived Fridley, MN 55432 � � �■ 41 0 � � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICENSES C��� S�RVIC�S_ Rollins Heating 8r. AIC 2420 W Co Rd C Roseville MN 55113-2594 Joyce Laird �_R.AL CnNTRA�TOR-COMMERCI�L Horwath Construction Co 4457 Hil�vale Ave N Oakdale MN 55128- Geroge Horwath Marco Ptoperty Management 80 E Minnesota Ave Little Canada MN 55117-1736 Olson T J Inc •Box 201622 Bloomington MN 55420-7622 -Tim Greeninger Ted 01son Steel James Construction 1410 Sylvan St St Paul MN S51I7-4606 Dan McKay ��1VERA CONTRACTOR-RESiDENTIAL Accord Home Builders (1492) 1273 Bucher Ave Shoreview MN 55126-8605 Mark Peterson Asphalt Specialties Co (5132) 15001 Hudson Blvd PO Box 838 Lakeland MN 55043-0838 Erik Peterson Bauer W F Construction (8869) 1080 VV Co Rd E Shoreview MN 55126-8022 Waher Bauer Bob's Sheetrock & Taping (6335) 726 Edmund Ave St Paul MN 55104-2725 Robert Syse Classic Home improvement (7353) 6012 Medicine Lake Rd Crystal MN 55422-3330 Mark Price 41A CLYDC WILEY Bldg/Mech Insp ' TOM BLAZINA Chief Btdg Ofcl Same Same Same STATE OF MINN Same Same Same Same Dicks Fire 8r. Storm (2481) 864 19 Ave SE Minneapolis MN 554I4-2504 Endura Construction Specialdes (2264) 636 Mendelssohn Ave N Golden Valley 1V[N 55427-4306 Franzen Construction Co (2744) 4250 5 St NE Columbia Heights MN 55421-2860 Kerchner Construction (4442) 3630 153 Ave N W Andover MN 55304-3017 M S Interiors P(us (8210) 5445 Babcock Trl N206 Inver Grove Hgts MN 55077-1710 Marquis Inc (8439) 1556 McClung Dr Arden Hills MN 55112-1950 Midwest Window Co (2130) 3739 Minnehat�a Ave S Minneapolis MN 55406-2630 Northwest Masonry Inc (5452) 22022 7 St NE Cedar MN 55011-9638 Redmond Roger �-iomes (1207) 11735 48 Pl Plymouth MN 55442-2271 Weisenberger Construction (1847) 615 Russeil Ave N Minneapolis MN 55411-3649 Westphal Roofing (3937) 8232 Greenwood Dr Mounds View MN 55112-4616 Arnold Tabor David Peterson RobeR Franzen Bill Kerchner Mike Skouge Mark Pignatello Terry Shonblom Steve Palmer Joe Redmond Terry Weisenberger Roger Westphal . : Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same Same HEATING Anderson Heating & A/C 4347 Central Ave NE Columbia Heights MN 55421-2925 MOBILE HOME INSTALLER Gerrys Mobile Home Service (1701) Rt 1 Box 592 Mora MN 55051-9201 Skis Transfer Inc (1b91) 2913 85 Ave NE Blaine MN 55449-7222 PLUMBING P & D Mechanical Contracting 4629 41 Ave N Robbinsdale MN 55422-1802 Plymouth Plumbing Inc 6909 Winnetka Ave Brooklyn Park MN 55428-1662 Property Repair Service Inc 4419 Nicollet Minneapolis MN 555409-2034 RDC Plumbing Co 618 Railroad Dr Elk River MN 55330-1454 WRECKING J& D Enterprises of Duluth 5197 I,avaque Rd Duluth MN 55803-9720 Ricky Anderson Gerry Anderson Dick Obrian Bill Daugheriy Ron Posterick R Crawford Robert Carpenter Judie Cich 41C CLYDE WILEY Bldg/Mech Insp STATE OF MINN Same STATE OF MINN Same Same Same THOMAS BLAZINA Chief Bldg Ofcl Propertv Owner FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL September 13, 1993 Address DUPLEXES & SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS: J. THOMAS & M. KOLODJSKI JOHN GLENN WAYNE THOMPSON GEORGE LUNDE MARVEY MAYER ED-RAY BUILDERS „ n �, „ n n � � n NORMA WILLSON FLOYD BRADLEY GREGG HINZ DONALD FINDELL STEVEN MINDLIN MOSTAFA MALEKA KAREN & DOUGLAS HORNSTEN S'TUART ANDERSON - MAX PETERSON GARY MUSKE RODGER & LAVEARLE CAREY STUART ANDERSON NORMA WILLSON J. ABBOTT & K. ROEHL BRUCE HERRICK AUREN KERNTOP JOE & LYNN PILON CONNIE RAJAMAMNAN � D & S ELIAS AL SCHIRO D & S ELIAS THOMAS SHIER DON KLOSTREICH MARITA LARSON MARITA LARSON ROBERT SHIMANSKI JACQUELYN HORNER CAROLE GADKE-BERGE CAREY THAKE JEROME DOLD JEROME DOLD Page 1 6400 ABLE ST 7325 ABLE ST , 7339-41 ABLE ST 7401-03 ABLE ST 7431-33 ABLE Sf 7479-81 ABLE ST 7495-97 ABLE ST 7501-03 ABLE S'T 7513-15 ABLE ST 7527-29 ABLE ST 7539-41 ABLE ST 7553-55 ABLE ST 7565-67 ABLE ST 7579-81 ABLE ST 7595-97 ABLE ST 6444 BAKER ST _ 6830 BROOKVIEW 6600-04 CENTRAL AVE 6640 CENTRAL AVE 7335-7 CENTRAL AVE 14U-42 CHARLES SI' 6190-92 E RIVER RD 6409 E RIVER RD 7320-22 EVERT CI' 1301-03 FIRESIDE DR 7857-61 FIRWOOD WAY 539 GLENCOE 401 IRONTON ST 4100 MAIN ST 4551 MAIN ST 5835 MAIN ST 5981-83 MAIN 5550 MEIST'ER RD 1240-42 NORTON AVE 1241-43 NORTON AVE 1250-52 NORTON AVE 1295-97 NORTON AVE 41 OSBORNE WAY 6315-17 PIERCE ST 6325-27 PIERCE ST 6335 PIERCE ST 6361 PIERCE ST 6389-91 PIERCE ST 1441-43 RICE ST 6100-02 STAR LN 6110-14 STAR LN . � LICEN8E8 No.of Units Fee 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 i 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 24.00 12.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 12.00 12.00 24.00 12.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 12.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 12.00 24.00 12.00 12.00 24.00 24.00 12.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 12.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 12.00 12.00 24.00 12.00 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL September 13, 1993 Pronerty Owner JEFFREY HARRIS G & G BUILDING ED & DORIS CHIES � J THOMAS & M KOLODJSKI ROBERT HOSMAN JUDITH ANN OSIECKI JERRY & BARBRA MCNURLIN PAUL SLESAR AL BATES EDWARD OTREMBA NHC PROPERTIES RONALD & PATRICIA NOLBY JOSEPH SINIGAGLIO THOMAS ZANDLO RICHARD KAPPES DOUGLAS FIEGE ROLAND WI�iITCOMB GARY MUSKE MARK & BETH ZELENAK CHRISTINE BATES DOUGLAS FINCH ROBERT HUBER THOMAS GLIADON DARYL KRECH GARY MUSKE � GARY MUSKE W. THOMAS & G. SHIER GARY MUSKE ED CHIES JUGAL AGARWAL MULTIPLE DWELLINGS: RIVERWOOD APARTMENTS PREMIUM INVESTMENTS „ MARLISS WESTENFIELD S SEVERSON & J KOCH FIVE SANDS DEVELOPMENT n ,� � �� LEONARD DAILEY TED BIGOS ARNOLD ELMQUISI' RICHARD DEMPSEY Address Page 2 6160-64 STAR LN 6421-23 STARLTTE CIR 7373-75 UNIV AVE 7337-39 UNIV AVE 7389 VAN BUREN ST 5940-42 2ND ST 6001-03 2ND ST 5936-38 2ND ST 5780-90 2 1/2 ST 5783-5 2 1/2 ST 5057 3RD ST' 5141-43 3RD ST 5181-83 3RD ST 5191-93 3RD ST 5330-34 4TH S'I' 5370 4TH ST 5461 4TH sT 5830-32 4TH ST 5850-52 4TH ST . 5940 4TH SI' 5373-75 STH ST 6262-64 STH ST 5335-37 6TH ST 5381-83 6TH ST 1313-23 73RD AVE 1581-83 73RD AVE 1591-93 73RD AVE 1580-84 73 1/2 AVE 1590-94 73 1/2 AVE 360-62 74TH AVE 370-72 74'TH AVE 5960-80 ANNA ST 6551 CHANNEL RD 6571 CHANNEL RD 6551 E RIVER RD 7673 E RIVER RD 7805 E RIVER RD 7825 E RIVER RD 7845 E RIVER RD 7875 E RIVER RD 7895 E RIVER RD 8191 E RIVER RD 5101 HORIZON DR 6417 HWY 65 6341 HWY 65 41E LICENBEB No.of Units Fee 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 33 11 11 11 4 59 59 59 59 59 5 5 7 10 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 12.00 24.00 12.00 24.U0 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 12.00 24.00 12.(f0 12.00 24.00 12.00 12.00 24.00 12.00 24.00 12,00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 24.00 91.00 49.00 49.00 49.00 36.00 143.00 143.00 143.00 143.00 143.00 3b.00 36.00 36.00 49.00 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL September 13, 1993 Propert�Owner ARNO & MARJORIE ROSIN S & S INVESTMENT M LAURENCE & KAREN RUSSELL RICHARD & SUZANNE FEIST ROBERT & KATHLEEN ANDRES ACCAP SR INVESTMENT DONALD KEEFE DAVID HERYLA THOMAS WOLFF JOHN WEATHERLY Mr. & Mrs. BENKSTEIN MOSI'AFA MALEKI ARNOLD ASPENSON R SMITH & J WEBER S & A DEVELOPMENT JOHN CONDA JERRY 8c BARBARA MCNURLIN R GESINO & L EPPERLY „ ROGER BLESI ARNOLD ELMQUIST „ TED BIGOS � „ „ „ n �� �� E NORWOOD & B BRAI'TI-IWAITE WILLARD GUIMONT RICHARD & NANCI ANDERSON ARNOLD ELMQUIST JIM WEATHERLY NAEEM QURESHI LAURETTA WELTER JAMES PENG BIGOS PROPERTY �� JOHN BLAHOSKI OTTY PROPERTIES JERRY DOLD Address Page 3 7400 LYRIC LN 5475 MAIN ST 5495 MAIN ST 6011 MAIN ST 6021 MAIN ST 117 M�SS PL 137 MISS PL 1284=96 NORTON AVE 201 SATELLITE LN 5761 2ND ST 5770 2ND ST 5830 2ND ST 5848 2ND ST 5866 2ND ST 6501 2ND ST 6551 2ND ST 5770 2 1/2 ST 5800 2 1R ST 5820 2 1/2 S'T . 5900 2 1/L ST 5908 2 1/2 ST 5916 2 1iL ST 5924 2 1/2 ST 4901 3RD ST 4913 3RD ST 4921 3RD ST 4939 3RD ST 4949 3RD ST 5200 3RD ST 5201 3RD ST 5230 3RD ST 5231 3RD ST. 5260 3RD ST � 5261 3RD ST 5290 3RD ST 5291 3RD ST 5974 3RD ST 5980 3RD ST 6061-63-65 3RD ST 6393 3RD ST 5401 4TH ST 5600-06 4TH ST 5370 STH ST 5428 STH ST 215 53RD AVE 305 53RD AVE 105 58'TH AVE 110 61ST AVE 290 61ST AVE 41F LICEN8E8 No.of Units Fee 8 12 12 4 4 4 4 7 11 3 8 4 8 4 3 7 11 4 4 7 7 7 7 � 7 7 7 7 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 4 4 3 7 4 4 3 4 4 7 7 8 3 49.(� 49.00 49.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 49.00 36.00 49.00 36.00 49.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 49.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36,00 36.00 36.00 36.00 49.00 49.00 49.00 49.00 49.00 49.00 49.00 49.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.Q0 49.00 36.00 FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL September 13, 1993 ProQerty Owner RICE CRK TOWNHOUSE CO « RICE CRK TOWNHOUSE CO � RICE CRK TOWNHOUSE CO n » M n � � � N „ �� „ � �� ,� . „ „ p �� N � n � EDWARD ANDERSON STELI.AR INC. GARY RESHETAR BUILDING MANAGEMENT BEHUN & PE'TERSON JAMES ISLER S. SEVERSON & J. KOCH D-62 PROPERTIES AUREN KERNTOP CONDOMINIUMS: JOSEPH & JENNY $IDWELL ANGELINE SEWALL ROLAND & BELLE RAE KRUEGER LYLE CHRISTIE ADELE & ROGER GORMAN JAMES & DEBBIE COX D MERTENS & S WINKELS SCHWIETERS & ASSOC. LINDBERG INVESTMENTS Address Page 4 _ T565-7-9-71-5-7 68'I'fi 1566-8-7-0-2-4-6 68T'H 157&80-2-4-6-8 b8TH 1579-80-3-5-7-9 68'1'H 1590-2-4-6 68T'H AVE . 1591-3-5-7 68'I'H AVE 1600-2-4-6-8-10 68'I'H 1601-3-5-7-9-11 68'I'H 1612-4-6-8 68T�-I AVE 1613-5-7-9 68TH AVE 1620-2-4-6-&30 68'I'H 1623-25-27-29-31 681'H 1632-4-6-8 68TT-i AVE 1633-5-7-9 68'I'H AVE 1640-2-4-6-8-50 68TH 1641-3-5-7-9-51 68'I'H 1652-4-6-8 fi8TH AVE 1653-5-7-9 68TH AVE 1600-2-4-6=8-70 68'TH � 1661-3-5-7-9�71 68TH 1672-4-6-8-80-2 68T'H 1673-5-7-9-81-3 681�I 1560-2-4-6-8-70 69'I'H 1590-2-4-6 69'TH AVE I600-2-4-6 69TH AVE 1630-2-4-6-8-40 69'TH 1650-2-4-6-8 69'TH 1200 72ND AVE 1250 72ND AVE 1441 73RD AVE 1619 73RD AVE 351 74TH AVE 389 74TH AVE 106 77TH WAY 211 79TH WAY 321 79TH WAY 1601 N. INNSBRUCK DR #I12 # 141 # 153,356 #208 #237,282,355 #273 #274 #275 #308,353,363 41G I.ICENSES No.of Units Fee 6 6 6 6 4 4 6 6 4 4 6 6 4 4 6 6 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 � 4 6 5 42 29 18 24 11 11 4 8 8 1 1 2 I 3 1 1 1 3 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 3b.U0 36.Q0 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 3b.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 3b.t?0 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 109.00 83.00 61.00 73.00 49.00 49.00 36.00 49.00 49.00 12.00 12.00 24.00 12.00 36.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 36.00 41H 'FOR CONCORRENCE BY THE CITY COIINCIL ESTIMATES F�� _ SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Statement for Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attorney for the Month of July, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,207.50 Northwest Asphalt 1451 County Road 8 Shakopee, MN 55379 Street Reconstruction Program Project No. ST. 1993 - 1& 2 Estimate No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 237,137.34 Isaacson Lawn Care 10515 County Road 116 Rogers, MN 55374 Lake Pointe Maintenance Project No. 244 Estimate No. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,497.36 Gunderson Brothers Cement Contracting 2235 Snelling Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55404 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Project No. 245 Estimate No. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ �98.25 42