09/13/1993 - 4942'� -
_ FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL
F�� SEPTEMBER 13, 1993
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION:
Citizenship Day: September 17, 1993
Constitution Week: September 17 - 23, 1993
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of August 16, 1993
�� ��
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
�� ��
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
(Consideration of ltems Not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
Presentation by Barbara Sykora from
Congressman Rod Grams' Office
FRIDLEY CIIY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING:
Amend Redevelopment Project Area and
Create Tax Increment District No 13
��
�
.�
. ...............
� =
,�wG�
64th Avenue Storm Water Projec
No.260 ..............�................... 2-2A
� ��
�1
OLD BUSINESS-
Second Reading of an Ordinance
Under Section 12.06 of the City ��'O"'''�
Charter Declaring Certain Real "� H
Estate to be Surplus and
Authorizing the Sale Thereof . . . . . . . . . �. . 3 - 3C
� ��
Second Reading of an Ordinance
Recodifying the Fridley City Code,
Chapter 205, Entitled "Zoning," by
Amending Sections 205.07.06,
205.08.06, 205.09.07, and 205.10.06,
and Renumbering the Remaining
Sections Consecutively . . . . . . . . . . . .
��
'L. ,(% l
v? � .
. ,-
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 3
NEW BUSINESS:
Appointment: City Employee . . . �'�:
First Reading of an Ordinance
Recodifying the Fridley City
Code, Chapter 102, Entitled
uPolice," by Amending �cJ
Section 102.03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
/
Resolution in Support of an
Application for a Minnesota
Lawful Gambling Premise �
Permit to Fridley Jaycees
(Sandee's Restaurant) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolution in Support of an
Application for a Minnesota
Lawful Gambling Premise
Permit to Fridley Jaycees
(Joe DiMaggio's Restaurant)
�
,
�
f �
�
�
5
�.........
��
���
�
��
/"
6-6A
7-7A
,,/ -
/ �
.. �.. 8-8A
v�'
Approve Junk Yard License Renewal �r,v,(j
for Sam's Auto Body Parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�,�-
. ..
� �
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER i 3, 1993 Page 4
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�:
Receive the Minutes of the CAN
Advisory Commission Meeting of
July 28, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
��
. ��.......
�,.
U �
Receive the Minutes of the Pianning
Commission Meeting of August 11, 1993 : . . . . . . . . . . . .
A. Establish a Public Hearing
for September 27, 1993,
for a Preliminary Plat Request,
P.S. #93-03, by Oliver Tam,
Tam Addition, to Replat
Property Generally Located
at 1160 F�reside Drive N.E.
B. Establish a Public Hearing
for September 27, 1993,
for a Rezoning Request,
ZOA #93-01, by Oliver Tam,
to Rezone Property from C-3,
General Shopping Center,
to R-3, General Multiple
Dwelling, on Property
Generally Located at i 160
Fireside Drive N.E. . . . . . .
�
... .Uy 11
..... . 11K
/�,e�-�
S �
� �
�
...............
10 - 10V
11 - 11SS
�
�J��
G
- 1�G
- 11 BB
��
�%
11G - 11
11CC - 11L
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 5
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUE �:
Receive the Minutes of the Planning
Commission Meeting of August 11, 1993
(Continued):
C. Establish a Public Hearing
for September 27, 1993,
for a Vacation Request,
SAV #93-03, by the City of
Fridley to Vacate all
Easements as Donated and
Dedicated to the Public
for Drainage and Utility
Purposes and as Shown on
the Recorded Plat of
Shorewood Plaza, as
Corrected by Surveyor's
Certificate Files as Document
No. 176792, Generally Located
at the Intersection of
Highway 65 and East Moore
Lake Drive Between Highway
65 and Central Avenue. The
Subject Parcels Include the
East and West Moore Lake
Shopping Centers, the Northwest
Racquet Swim and Health Club,
and Sears Outlet . . . . . . . . . .
�
1���'�' -5�
�
.................
Establish a Public Hearing for
September 27, 1993, for a
Preliminary Plat Request,
P.S. #93-02, by the City of
Fridley, to Replat Property
Generally Located at the
Intersection of Highway 65
and East Moore Lake Drive,
Between Highway 65 and Central
Avenue .................
.�S
,
���
t�
111 - 11J
11MM - 11SS
�'J �
� ��
G�
.................... 12-12Q
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 6
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
Receive an Item from the Minutes of
the Appeals Commission Meeting of
July 27, 1993: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13N
A. Variance Request, VAR #93-18,
by Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen,
to Reduce the Front Yard Setback
from 35 Feet to 31.3 Feet; to
Reduce the Side Yard Setback
from 5 Feet to 2.3 Feet; all
to Allow the Construction of a
Double Car Garage at 5831 West
Moore Lake Drive N.E.
i �
s�
S `"
�
,
/ (�
�
Receive an Item from the Minutes of
the Appeals Commission Meeting of
August 31, 1993: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . . 14 - 140
A. Variance Request, VAR #93-22,
by Mark Btegen, to Reduce the
Front Yard Setback from 35 Feet
to 8.2 Feet; to Reduce the Side
Yard Setback from 10 Feet to
9.8 Feet; to Allow the
Reconstruction of a Nonconforming
Siructure that was Damaged More
Than Fifty Percent of its Value
Due to Fire Damage, Generally
Located at 275 Ironton Street N.E.
Resolution Extending Approval of a
Subdivision, Lot Split, L.S. #93-01,
to Create Two Separate Parcels
Generally Located North of 61 st
Avenue and West of Fifth Street
(By Westminster Corporation)
�
/
� DS
�. i
.....................
15 - 15E
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 7
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�
Approve Rebcation Consultant �� ��'
Contract with Professional /0�
c
Redevelopment Resources . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16H
Approve Rental License Application S�/�S
for Resrdential Rental Property
Located at 541 - 53 1/2 Avenue �r �
N.E. ....................................... 17-17B
Approve Rental License Application �3/�
for Residential Rental Property
Located at 4042 Main Street N.E. . . . . . . . . . .�. . . . . . . 18 - 18A
Establish a Public Hearing S
for September 27, 1993, for �� N�
Consolidation of the Fridley ;��%c,�j
Police Relief Association's �
Police Pension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Establish a Public Hearing
for December i, i 993; a
Reconvening Date of
December 13, 1993, if Necessary;
and a Subsequent Hearing Date
of December 20, 1993, on the
1994 Budget fior the City of
Fridley
�/��
19
� �� v��
y�`�`,� � �
.....................................
20 - 20C
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 8
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�:
Resolution Adopting a °Proposed"
Budget for the Fiscal Year 1994
y�� �s/'",_!
............ .. � . 21 -21B
Resolution Certifying "Proposed" dK�
Tax Levy Requirements for 1994 to ��� s���S
the County of Anoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .r . . . . 22 - 22A
�i
Resolution Authorizing Changes in
Appropriations for the General Fund,
Cable TV Fund, Grant Management Fund,
HRA Reimbursement Fund, Drug and
Gambling Forfeiture Fund, and the
Capital Improvement Fund for the Year
��a�
�l�.�- DSI ��
.
......................................
Resolution Designating 1992 Fund r�
Balances ..........................
23 - 23C
Approve Amendment of Joint Powers
Agreement for Construction and � ry,.l,�
Operation of Fire Training Site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
��
/ �V�'
24C
25 - 25B
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 9
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED :
Receive Petition from Residents on
Stinson Boulevard Between 73rd Avenu
and Osborne Road . . . . . . . . . . . . .
���
e P�„ �►
............... -26B
Receive Petition from Residents on �sJ "� w
Hathaway Lane East of Regis Drive . . . .�.�. . �. . . . . . . . . - B
�--�
Resolution Ordering Improvement, � �
Final Plans, and Estimates of Costs G� �l�✓ G�
Thereof and Amending Street Improvement
Project No. ST. 1993 - 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Resolution Ordering Improvement
and Approval of Final Plans
and Estimates of Costs Thereof
and Adding to the 1993
Street tmprovement Project
No. ST. 1993 - 1& 2: Hathaway
Lane East of Regis Drive
�
...............
Resolution Ordering Improvement,
Final Plans and Estimates of Costs
Thereof and Amending: Street
Improvement Project No. ST.
1993 - 1 & 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�i Cs.�
�/,��
........ 29
�8��5
��� �ls•«.%
................... 30-30B
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING �F SEPTEMBER 13, 1993
NEW BUStNESS,�CONTlNUED):
Resolution C)rdering Improvement
and Approvai of Pians and Estimates
of Costs thereof and Adding to the
1993 Street Improvement Project No.
ST. i 993 - 1& 2: Seventh Street
From Madison Street to 900 Feet West
Approve Change Order No. 1, Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 1993 1& 2
a� ��a-�u..J
� �
..... ,��?� 31
Page 1 a
.�a�Ce�.�,�.,,��
.�J . , . . . . 32 - 32C
P "'
�' !
Resolution Estabiishing Municipai n.�!�..�
State Aid Streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 - 33B
� �
� �� �i
Resolution Revoking Municipai
State Aid Stree#s . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolution Authorizing Advertisement
for Bids for Locke Park Fi�ter Plant
Re air Pro'ect No 24�
i�`�C'`''
��
��
.�.C�.....
t
��.�G�. aN!�.�-�
p, � . ....... ..............
� 6�
�
�
.
K,
35 - 35B
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 10
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
Resolution Ordering Improvement
and Approvai of Plans and Estimates
of Costs thereof and Adding to the
1993 Street improvement Project No.
ST. 1993 - 1& 2: Seventh Street
From Madison Street to 900 Feet West
� ����
� G
..... ,�,�5 31
Approve Change Order No. 1, Street a''C4``�
Improvement Project No. ST. 1993 1 & 2 . .��- . . . . . . . 32 - 32C
� �,,.
Resolution Establishing Municipal �wC�t/
State Aid Streets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�C � . . . .
�l
Resolution Revoking Municipal
State Aid Streets . . . . . . . . . . . .
�,
. 33 - 33B
. . ��� 6�et . . . 34
� �
�j�
Resolution Authorizing Advertisement %�N ���
for Bids for Locke Park Filter Plant
Repair, Pro�ect No. 240 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
� r� ��
�
�
35 - 35B
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 11
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�
Approve Funding for the Stream
Bed and Bank Erosion Control -��
Pro�ect on the 400 Block of
Rice Creek Terrace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 - 36E
Authorize the Advertisement for �
Bid Pro osals for the Lease/Purchase �S
P
of a New Sidewalk Snowplow and
Accessories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 - 7G
Receive Bids and Award Contract
for Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisifion (SCADA) Project
No. 259;
and,
Authorize Payment for the Design
of the City Surveillance Items .....
Claims
�
� `��._.'�3.,
� �
, ....................
38 - 38B
39
............. ....................... 40
�.
�� �
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993 Page 12
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED :
Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 - 41 H
Estimates . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
.�`� -�
�
. �
ADJOURN:
♦
�iti�enship �ay - �ePtember t�,1993
William J. Nee
Mayor
Fridley. MN
�onstitution �ee� - �eptember 17 - 23,1993
`Wd�f ��}lS, �WetRe Peopee, did okdaiK aKd estab�isR a CoastitutioK {�ok tRe Ukited States
o{� .�LwteAiCGt to SeCUke t�e beessiKc�s o� �ibexty {fok ouASe@lYes akd ouk posteAit�; akd
�laid�(�i��iS, it is iw�poAtGtkt t�t CiQe Citizexs �-uQQ,� ukde�stakd tRe pkovisio�,s, pkiKeipP.es,
aKd wte,aKiKc� o� tRe L'oKstitutioK so tRe�y caK suppoKt, pkesexVe akd de�exd it agaiast
e,�eKOacRwte,�t; a�d
�1�id�(�t��iS, tRe PAesideKt akd tRe Clokg�ess o� tRe UKited States RaU�e desic�Kated
Se.pte,nbex 17, 1993, as C�.itize,�s�ip �Day, aKd tRe wee12 0{� Septe.�bex 17 - 23, 1993, as
Cokstitutiok �We.e{2; a�d
�l�(d�(��>4S, tRe pe.opee o{� �tRe C.'ity o� �xid2e.y do e.kjoy tRe bP,e.ssikc�s o{� �ibexty, tRe
guaKaktees o� tRe BiQQ o{� 12igRts, e.qua� pAOtectiok o{� tR.e P,aw ukdex t9�e C.'o�.stitutioK, aKd
tRe �Keedow�s dexiue,d. �KOw� it.
.No�w, T���=�or2�, � rrr2�so��v� ta�t r, ��e�a»�J .��, Mayo� o� t�e e�ty
o�- ��de�y ���y pKO���� s�t�� ��,1g�, as C�''tize,�sRip �Day a�d tRe week o{�
Septe,w�beA 17 -?3, 1993, as Co�,stitutioK �We.ef2 aKd iKu�ite evexy citizeK aKd i►lstitutioK to joiK
iK t�.e Cowurie.,+wKCltiok.
�JI( �Wf �I(�SS �Wd�l ��0�, I Rat�e set w�y
Raad a�d cause.d tRe. se.a2 0{� t�e City o�
�ideey to be a{�{�ixed tRis 13tR day o{�
Septe.w�bex, 1993.
William J. Nee, Mayor
THE MINOT88 OF TH8 RBGIILAR MESTING OF THS FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL OF
AIIGUST 16, 1993
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:34 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of A1Zegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson and
Councilman Schneider
Councilman Billings and Councilman Fitzpatrick
Mayor Nee stated that Councilman Billings is on vacation.
Councilman Fitzpatrick is ill, and they have both been excused.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING. AUGUST 2j 1993:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the minutes as
presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
Mayor Nee requested that the estimate from Barna, Guzy & Steffen,
Ltd. be added to the estimates.
MOTI�N by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above
addition. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote,
a11 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM. VISITORS:
PRESENTATION OF PETITION NO. 13-1993 TO IMPROVE STORM WATER
RUNOFF IN THE AREA OF 64TH AVENUE:
Mr. Joe Nelson, 1357 64th Avenue, presented a petition to the
Council to improve the storm water runoff in their area. He stated
that the residents support construction of a detention pond with
the pipe outi�t at the Central Avenue culvert. He also understands
that the cost of this project is approximately $120,000. He stated
that there is another option to construct a pipe from Mississippi
Street to the Central Avenue culvert to reduce the surface water
runoff, and that the cost of this project is approximately
$100,000. He stated that the residents request the Council to look
at this option as a remedy to their storm water problem.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MR$TING OF AIIGIIBT 16, 1993 PAGE 2
Mr. NeYson stated that the residents are requesting the Council to
consider that participation in the project would be a maximum of
$1,000 per residential lot. He requested that the assessment shall
be based on the premise that all properties that are currently
split into multiple lots, that is, two or three plots per
residential address, will be assessed no more than $1,000.
Mr. Nelson stated that the petition has been signed by 21 of the
38 property owners involved. He stated that when circulating this
petition, he represented himself as best he could to explain the
City�s position and the process. He said that this was a very
difficult task and that he had to put his reputation on the line
in order to get some people to sign the petition. He stated that
the item he feels is the most important and non-negotiable is that
the maximum assessment be $1,000. He stated that several persons
are afraid the price may increase. If that occurs, he wanted the
petition withdrawn. If this could not be done, he would get
another petition to have this withdrawn. He stated that in regard
to the split or multiple lots, three people are involved, and some
of these people are retired and on fixed incomes.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider ta receive Petition No. 13-1993.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Schneider stated that circulating this petition was a
tremendous amount of work, and he thanked Mr. Nelson.
Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, what
the next step would be in order to start this project.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a public hearing
would have to be set for the improvement, and then this project
could probably be done in conjunction with the TCAAP interconnect
project. He stated that if the public hearing could be established
for September 13, 1993, it would expedite the project.
PETER EISENZIMMER. 6535 OAKLEY DRIVE RE: MEADOWLANDS PARK
AND MISSISSIPPI AND UNIVERSITY INTERSECTION:
Mr. Eisenzimmer, 6535 Oakley Drive, asked when the work at
Meadowlands Park would be completed.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the contractor does
not work for the City but is employed by Wal-Mart. He stated that
the City has asked Wal-Mart to request the contractor to complete
this work. If this is not done, the City has a bond to assure that
it is completed.
Mr. Eisenzimmer stated that the intersection improvement at
University Avenue and Mississippi Street has hurt businesses due
to the fact that the turning lane was removed to access Burger King
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETINQ OF AIIGIIST 16. 1993 PAGE 3
and the other businesses in that area. He felt that the businesses
should have had some input if a road was to be blocked off. He
stated that businesses will not succeed if there isn't an easy
access. He stated that the variety store in Holly Center has
already gone out of business.
LOCK LAKE DAM•
Mr. Leon Hinkel, 50 70th Way, asked what the cost was to replace
the dam at Locke Lake. He stated that he understood the cost to
be $635,000; however, the Focus reported that it was $800,000.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the cost to replace
the dam itself is estimated at $635,000, but the City is looking
at some other options and improvements for a fishing pier and a
canoe portage which could bring the cost to about $800,000.
Mr. Hinkel stated that he does not benefit from this project. He
felt it was a conflict of interest for Mr. Flora, a public
official, to support the project when he lives on the creek.
Councilman Schneider stated that Mr. Flora is implementing the
Council's policy, as the Council is on record that the dam is the
City's responsibility.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that a public official is someone
elected by the public, and Mr. Flora is a public employee, not an
elected official. She stated that the Council makes the decisions
on the projects, and these are implemented by staff.
Mr. Gregg Herrick, Assistant City Attorney, stated that Mr. Flora
is not a public official in the sense that he has no authority to
direct any e}cpenditure of funds for a project. He stated that only
the City Council has the authority to direct how funds will be
expended and used for the dam reconstruction. He stated that Mr.
Flora is a public employee carrying out the Council's direction,
and he does not see a conflict of interest.
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON RECONSTRUCTION OF 7TH STREET FROM MADISON
STREET TO 900 FEET WEST:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, and the public hearing
opened at 7:55 p.m.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that a petition was
received signed by 62 percent of the residents to improve a portion
of Seventh Street by widening and resurfacing the street and
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTING OF AIIGUST 16, 1993 PAGE 4
installing concrete curb and gutter. He stated that the property
owners would be assessed only for the curb and gutter at a cost not
to exceed $8.00 a foot.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that Councilman Billings indicated
he supported this project.
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding this proposed
project.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 7:57 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS•
2. PRESENTATION OF THE 1994 PRELIMINARY DRAFT BUDGET:
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this preliminary draft
budget is submitted in accordance with the City Charter
requirement. He stated that the budget does not include any
property tax levy increase. He stated that the total budget is
$11,430,209, and it is balanced with the estimated revenues.
Mr. Pribyl outlined the percentage of increases in the General,
Special Revenue, Capital Projects, Agency, and Enterprise Funds.
He stated that the total increase including all funds is
9.8 percent over the 1993 budget.
Mr. Pribyl stated that a more extensive review of the budget will
be done in accordance with the truth in taxation hearings which
will be held in December.
Mayor Nee stated that this is a balanced budget. While costs have
increased, income from various sources has also increased. iie
stated that the most disturbing increase is the increased charges
for sewage disposal, which was very substantial.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the 1994 preliminary
draft budget. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
3. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE, CHAPTER 205 ENTITLED "ZONING," BY AMENDING SECTIONS
205 07 06 205 08 06 205 09 07 AND 205.10.06, AND
RENUMBERING THE REMAINING SECTIONS CONSECUTIVELY:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this
ordinance amendment requires that motor vehicles be stored and
parked on hard surface driveways and affects the residential zoning
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1993 PAGE 5
districts. She stated that the commercial and industrial zoning
districts are not covered in this ordinance amendment as this
requirement is addressed in another section of the code for those
particular zoning districts.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the
ordinance on first reading. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
4. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
JULY 28, 1993•
A. SPECIAL USE PERMIT SP #93-12, BY HOME VETERINARY SERVICE,
INC. TO ALLOW AN ANIMAL HOSPITAL. GENERALLY LOCATED AT
5895 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.:
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this is a
request for a special use permit to allow a veterinary clinic in
a C-2 zoning district. She stated that certain conditions must be
met for a special use permit which requires all windows in the area
of the building housing animals to be double-glazed with a fixed
sash, any ventilation system shall be designed so that no odors or
organisms will spread between wards or to the outside area, and
that there be no outside pens or holding areas.
Ms. Dacy stated that the petitioner is proposing a veterinary
clinic and a hospital to provide a grooming service and to board
animals. She stated that the maximum capacity would be 34 dogs and
cats. She stated that each ward will have a separate air exhaust
with charcoal filter, and there won't be any outside housing of
animals.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission was concerned about
the noise and odor. She stated that the petitioner indicated there
would be protection to prevent noise by adding additional wall
barriers and an extensive filter and ventilation system to prevent
odors. She stated that the Planning Commission recommended
approval of this special use permit with two stipulations, which
she outlined.
Mayor Nee stated that Councilman Billings attended the Planning
Commission meeting on this special use permit. He advised Council
that he has no objection.
Councilman Schneider asked the petitioner if he had plans for an
outside pen or for a holding area.
Dr. LeMay, the petitioner, stated that he does not have any plans
for outside pens or boarding, but they may have a walking area.
Ms. Dacy stated that the ordinance specifically states that outdoor
pens are not permitted.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 1993 PAGE 6
Dr. LeMay stated that the interior walls would be triple insulated.
If there are any complaints, he would be happy to try and resolve
this issue.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to grant Special Use Permit,
SP #93-12, with the following stipulations: (1) general site
clean-up, including repairing the fence, removing weeds located in
the shrub beds, in the area adjacent to the fence and in the
parking lot, addition of new rock to the shrub beds, and the
pruning of trees and shrubs, shall be completed by June l, 1994;
and (2) this special use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning
Commission in twelve months regarding noise and odor. Seconded by
Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
B. SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP #93-13, BY FRIENDLY CHEVROLET GEO,
INC. , TO ALLOW AGENCIES TO SELL OR DISPLAY NEW AND/OR USED
VEHICLES, RECREATIONAL VEHICLES OR BOATS, GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 7011 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.:
Mayor Nee stated that Councilman Billings attended the Planning
Commission meeting where this item was discussed. Councilman
Billings sent a letter to the residents of Holiday Hills concerning
the request. He stated that Councilman Billings indicated he would
support this request for a special use permit.
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this proposed
outdoor sale of vehicles would be held at the Columbia Arena, and
a special use permit is required. She stated that the sale would
be held on September 3, 4 and 6 over the Labor Day weekend, but
there would be no Sunday sales. She stated that Friendly Chevrolet
would provide a staff person for traffic control, and they would
construct a tent and provide portable Satellites on the premises.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval
of this special use permit with eleven stipulations as found in the
Council's agenda. She stated that the Council has approved a
similar request for Sam's Club.
Ms. Dacy stated that one of the stipulations requires a barricade
to be placed at the entrance to the neighborhood on 69th Avenue and
on 71st Avenue and that the barricade at 69th Avenue include a sign
that this is a residential area with no exit.
Mayor Nee asked how residents would access their homes.
Ms. Dacy stated that the person in charge of the traffic control
could advise persons that there would be no test driving of
vehicles, and the barricade could be strategically placed to allow
access for local traffic.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked where the test driving of the vehicles
would take place. She also wondered if this traffic would enter
Melody Manor.
FRIDLBY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 16. 1993 PAGg_7
Ms. Dacy stated she assumes that 69th Avenue would,be used to exit
onto University Avenue, or 73rd Avenue could be used to go east to
Central Avenue or west to University Avenue rather than north into
Melody Manor.
Councilman Schneider asked if there is an estimate on how many
persons would attend this sale.
Mr. Ronald Stelter, representing Friendly Chevrolet, stated it is
e�ected that several hundred people would attend.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she attended the sale sponsored
by Sam's Club. There were a lot of people, but the traffic was
very controlled.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that one of the stipulations was that
the cars for the sale be street operable and not be leaking fluid
excessively. She asked if this may be a problem.
Mr. Stelter stated that at the Planning Commission meeting the
question was raised if this sale would involve junk vehicles. He
stated that this would not be the case, and the vehicles would not
be leaking fluid. He stated that they hope to have three hundred
to four hundred cars from four different manufacturers. They would
be moving them on this site beginning the Friday before Labor Day.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to grant Special Use Permit,
SP #93-13, with the following stipulations: (1) the vehicle sales
will occur no more than once per year for no more than three days
over the Labor Day weekend; (2) the use of streamers, pennants, and
flags is prohibited; (3) the petitioner shall comply with the
temporary sign ordinance for all temporary signs on the property;
(4) the petitioner shall obtain a temporary building permit and
shall comply with Article 32 of the Uniform Fire Code; (5) the
portable toilets shall be handicapped accessible; (6) the
petitioner shall provide a traffic management person to properly
control traffic on site and to prevent problems occurring on
69th Avenue, the University Avenue frontage road, and to direct
unnecessary traffic away from the residential neighborhood; (7) the
participating dealerships shall apply for and receive the
appropriate City licenses; (8) there shall be no test driving of
cars in the residential neighborhood located south of 69th Avenue
and in Locke Park; (9) barricades shall be placed at the entrance
to the neighborhood on 69th Avenue and on 71st Avenue. The
barricade at 69th Avenue shall include a sign with the language
"Residential Area, No Exit"; (10) the cars for the sale shall be
street operable and shall not be excessively leaking fluid; and
(il) the special use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning
Commission prior to the next sale. Seconded by Councilwoman
Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AOGIIST 16. 1993 PAGE 8
The Council received the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of July 28, 1993.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 56-1993 CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
MODIFICATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO. 1 TO REFLECT INCREASED GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND
INCREASED PROJECT COSTS, THE MODIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS NO. 1
THROUGH NO. 12 TO REFLECT INCREASED PROJECT COSTS WITHIN
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PROPOSED
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 13 AND THE APPROVAL AND
ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN RELATING
THERETO•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 56-1993 to
set the public hearing for September 13, 1993. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. U.pon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
6. APPROVE HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
AND BRIAN KOVAR FOR THE PLACEMENT OF AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
IN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AT 7536 MCKINLEY STREET
N.E.
Ms . Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this property
is located on the west side of McKinley Street and zoned R-1. She
stated that there is an existing single-family home on the site and
a six foot drainage and utility easement along the west side. She
stated that the petitioner is proposing to construct a 12 foot by
16 foot detached accessory building. Ms. Dacy stated that through
the building permit process, it was determined there was a ten-foot
easement along the south property line, and this proposed building
would encroach into the easement by seven feet. She stated that
there are no City utilities within the easement. Staff contacted
each of the utility companies to ensure there are no conflicts if
the structure encroaches into the easement.
Ms. Dacy stated that Northern States Power and Minnegasco do not
have any objections to the City entering into a hold harmless
agreement with the owner. Nortel Cable and U.S. West
Communications called and said that they did not have any adverse
comments. She stated that staff has no objection to the
encroachment, and she wouZd recommend approval of the hold harmless
agreement.
Mayor Nee stated that the hold harmless agreement assumes the City
may need the easement at some future date. Constructing the
building on the easement is contingent on the property owner
entering into the hold harmless agreement.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the Mayor and City
Manager to enter into the hold harmless agreement to allow the
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF ADGOST 16. 1993 PAG$ 9
construction of a second accessory building within the unused
utility easement for the property at 7536 McKinley Street.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
7. APPROVE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS TO THE ANOKA COUNTY
TAXSYS SYSTEM•
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that approval of this
agreement would allow the City access into the County's tax system.
He stated that this has been in the City's goals and objectives and
now is available to connect into the County's system. He stated
that there would be no cost for connecting the first unit, and any
other connection would cost $50.00 each. He stated that at this
time the City is considering only this one connection, so there
would be no cost involved.
MOTTON by Councilman Schneider to approve the license agreement
for access to the Anoka County TAXSYS system. Seconded by
CounciZwoman Jorgenson.
Councilman Schneider stated that if someone wants tax information
regarding their property, the City can access a personal computer
and immediately provide this information.
Mr. Pribyl stated that most of the information is available through
the City Assessor's office, but this connection allows access into
a computer data base so it would avoid a resident having to go to
the County for tax information.
Mayor Nee stated that it is possible for someone in Fridley to make
an inquiry at Anoka County through the computer in regard to
property taxes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
8. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR THE 1.5 MILLION GALLON
WATER RESERVOIR PAINTING PROJECT NO. 251:
MOTYON by Councilman Schneider to receive the following bids for
the 1.5 milZion gallon water reservoir painting project No. 251:
Bidder
Total Bid
Central Sandblasting $40,000.00
2299 County Road H
New Brighton, MN 55122
J.B. Nelson & Son $42,425.00
962 Central Avenue N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55413
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGII$T 16, 1993 PAGE 10
TMI Coatings $49,750.00
2805 Dodd Road
St. Paul, MN 55121
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that bids were opened on
August 11, 1993 for this project. Three bids were received. He
stated that the low bidder was Central Sandblasting in the amount
of $40,000. He stated that references have been checked, and
Central Sandblasting was found to be a reputable company.
Mr. Flora would recommend the Council award the contract to them.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if there was any lead in the paint.
Mr. Flora stated that there was none.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to award the contract for the
1.5 million gallon water reservoir painting project No. 251 to the
low bidder, Central Sandblasting, in the amount of $40,000.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
9. APPROVE REMOVAL OF 10 INCH ASH TREE AT THE MOORE LAKE BEACH
PARKING LOT•
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that with the construction
of the Moore Lake Beach parking lot, three trees need to be
removed. He stated that two of these trees will be relocated, but
an Ash tree needs to be removed. He stated that approval is needed
from the Parks and Recreation and Planning Commissions, as well as
the Council, to comply with the City Code prior to the City
removing a diameter tree on City-owned property.
Mr. Flora stated that the Parks and Recreation Commission members
were polled. Four of the five members indicated they had no
objection to removal of the tree, and the Planning Commission
unanimously approved removal of the Ash tree with the condition
that two additional trees be planted at the park to replace the one
removed and that the new trees conform with City ordinance
requirements.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the removal of the ten-
inch Ash tree at the Moore Lake Beach parking lot, with the
condition that two additional trees be planted at the park to
replace this tree and that the new trees conform with City
ordinance requirements. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGOST 16. 1993 PAGE il
10. APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO 1, CORRIDOR MAINTENANCE PROJECT
NO. 243•
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that in closing this
project, it was found that the City had to pay a 6.5 percent sales
tax on the total contract. He stated that this change order covers
the sales tax.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize Change Order No. 1 with
Innovative Irrigation for Corridor Maintenance Project No. 243 in
the amount of $971.56. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
11. RESOLUTION NO. 57-1993 AUTHORIZING THE ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS
FOR THE SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA AC4UISITION (SCADA)
SYSTEM, PROJECT NO. 259:
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that this supervisory
control and data acquisition system is associated with the TCAAP
interconnect project. He stated that plans and specifications
include an addendum bid for surveillance and meter instrumentation
for well houses 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 13. These items
are a City addition and City cost responsibility.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 57-1993 with
the addendum for surveillance and meter instrumentation for the
well houses. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
12. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY,
PARKS AND RECREATION:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that Mr. Jack Kirk, Director of
Recreation and Natural Resources, is present to comment and answer
questions raised by the Council at the last meeting pertaining to
CDBG funds for the City's Park and Recreation Department. He
stated that Mr. Kirk has talked to him about some new approaches
to this program that would allow a12 schoo2 districts in the City
to participate.
Mr. Kirk stated that he discussed the Council's concerns with
Mr. Burns, the City Manager, and the alternative is to welcome and
encourage students from the other school districts to participate
in this program. He stated that this is a pilot program, and
hopefully it can be expanded in the future.
Mr. Kirk stated that the City's seasonal brochure is mailed to all.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGUST 16, 1993 PAGE 12
residents of the City, and this program would be advertised to
invite students that are not part of School District No. 14 to
participate. He stated that he has contacted the school districts,
and he believed mailing addresses of students eligible for this
program could be obtained. The City would be sending them an
invitational flyer explaining the program so they know what
activities would be offered.
Mr. Kirk stated that there are about 913 middle school age youths
and 619 of those are in School District 14. This is about
68 percent. He stated that approximately three hundred middle
school youths are in the other three school districts, and a flyer
would be sent to those individuals. He stated that the Youth
Advisory Council would also like representation from students
outside of School District No. 14.
Mr. Kirk stated that Spring Lake Park and the Anoka Hennepin School
Districts have a program for their middle school students and an
activity bus. He stated that the Columbia Heights students do not
have an after school program and he has contacted representatives
from the Columbia Heights School District. He stated that the
Columbia Heights School District boundary is only a few blocks from
the Fridley School District boundary, and it appears the students
will have an opportunity to take a bus to the Fridley Middle School
to take part in the program. He stated that he is checking into
this further.
Councilman Schneider stated that when the program was presented to
the Council, it was unclear of the school district's part. He
stated that he understood their facilities were quite limited.
Mr. Kirk stated it is known that the gymnasiums are heavily used,
but there are a number of other facilities. He stated that the
computer labs, swimming pool, art and music rooms, and general
classrooms are some of the facilities that would be available for
activities. He stated that another option is using the facilities
at St. Phillip's Church, as they have indicated a wilZingness to
participate in the program. He stated that some of the preliminary
activities which have been identified involve trips, enrichment
programs in a foreign language, computers, art or music. He stated
that as of this date, there are no set programs and it is believed
the ideas and wishes of the students are needed in order for the
program to be successful.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the program would be only for the
school year or also during the summer months.
Mr. Kirk stated that he would like to continue the program through
the summer months.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is concern to expand the
recreation program in the northwest area of the City and get the
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AUGIIST 16. 1993 PAG$ 13
youth involved. She stated that a letter addressed to Councilman
Billings from Ken Phelps was received regarding the issue of how
to get these programs city-wide.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she attended a meeting of the
Steering Committee last Wednesday to address some of the concerns.
She stated that the canclusion was to proceed with the program and
get the information out to the school districts in order to involve
as many youths as possible and to get the students at risk involved
in these programs.
Mr. Kirk felt that the school personnel and teachers may be able
to identify those students who may benefit from the program, and
there may be an opportunity to provide a voucher to encourage these
students to participate. He felt that personal contact by a
teacher may get them involved.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there seems to be a great deal
of territorial boundaries that go alonq with the school districts.
She wondered how the students could be brought together.
Mr. Kirk stated that he felt this was difficult to answer, as there
could be some territorial concerns in bringing students from one
school to another. He felt that the instructors in the programs
should be made aware of this issue, and it would have to be
addressed as they proceed with the program.
Councilman Schneider stated that he discussed the program with the
Principal of the Middle School of District No. 14, Margaret
Leibfried, and he feels much more comfortable with the program.
He stated that he would like to make this an entire community
project, as the schools have a binding effect on the community, and
this may be an opportunity to bring the community together as a
whole.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to receive the letter from Ken
Phelps, 1513 Berne Road. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
12A. SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT ON 64TH AVENUE:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to suspend the rules in order to
introduce a motion to set the public hearing on the improvement on
64th Avenue pertaining to storm water as requested in the petition
submitted this evening. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon
a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to set a public hearing on the
64th Avenue stona improvement project for September 13, 1993.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
FRIDLSY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF AIIGIIST 16. 1993 PAGE 14
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
13. CLAIMS•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to authorize payment of Claim Nos.
50894 through 51181. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
14. LICENSES•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the licenses as submitted
and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
15. ESTIMATES•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as
submitted:
Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt
900 Meritor Tower
444 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Legal Services Rendered
April and May, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,287.80
Gunderson Brothers
2325 Snelling Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55404
Removal and Replacement of Miscellaneous
Concrete Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk
Project No. 245
Estimate No. 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1, 333. 38
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
1451 County Road 18
Shakopee, MN 55379
1993 Street Improvement
Project No. ST. 1993 - 1& 2
Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $69, 564.70
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEBTING OF AIIGIIST 16, 1993 PAGE 15
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the following additional
estimate:
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
200 Coon Rapids Boulevard N.W.
400 Northtown Financial Plaza
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
Statement for Services Rendered
for the Month of July, 1993 as
City Attorney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,112.48
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meeting. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting
of the Fridley City Council of August 16, 1993 adjourned at
9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
Approved:
I _
�
Community Development Department
P G DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: September 10, 1993
TO: William Burns, City Manager ��.
�
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Public Hearing to Amend Redevelopment Plan and
Establish Tax Increment District No. 13
The City Council established September 13, 1993 as the public
hearing to amend the redevelopment plan and create Tax Increment
District No. 13 for a parcel at the northwest corner of 51st Way
and Industrial Boulevard. ECO Finishing, Inc., is proposing to
construct a 29,000 square foot manufacturing facility. The City
Council should conduct the public hearing. Action on the
resolution creating the district is scheduled for the September 27,
1993 meeting.
BD/dn
M-93-521
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF FRIDLEY
COUNTY OF ANOKA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the City Council of the City of
Fridley, Minnesota, will hold a public hearing on Monday, September
13, 1993 commencing at 7:30 o'clock p.m. at City Hall, 6431
University Avenue N.E., Fridley, Minnesota, relating to the
approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for the
Housing & Redevelopment Authority's Redevelopment Project No. l,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.074,
inclusive. The hearing is also relative to the approval and
adoption of Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for the City's
Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 12 pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, inclusive. The
hearing is further relative to the establishment of proposed Tax
Increment Financing District No. 13 and the approval and adoption
of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179,
inclusive. Copies of the documentation relating to the above
proposed actions will be on file and available for public
inspection in the City Clerk's office.
The property proposed to be included in the Tax Increment Financing
District is described below and set forth on the attached map.
Tax Increment Financing District No. 13
includes the following P.I.N.:
27-30-24-12-0002
and is legally described as
Lot 1, Block 5, Great Northern Industrial Center
and is generally located at the corner of
51st Way and Industrial Boulevard
All interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their
views orally or in writing.
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter
or other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids
should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than September
6, 1993.
Publish: August 31, 1993
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
1s\ William Burns
City Manager
(insert map)
�Q
\
�
\
V
�
J
`� �.,
N//2 SEC. 27, T.30, f?.24
�� C/TY OF FR/OLEY
. ..:r - ;_ �.
r / � � F� `. .j_ .
�.i ' � . � . �i._I .
� � _ j d�lC�_
-O.
'- ....... � 1 '.' _ � 1
\
V
J
`
\
� .�
�
� �
� �
C`^ � I
v7
� �:
� f�
�
� fi'
� � j�
� �
� I
!
2� ;
�•
�
�
/ }
�[ /�,i � � �a
�
J
-- . I N O. 79
-- � �
6
a=�� �' ` � UN/TEO STA`TES Of AiL.'ER/CiO
,. ja� r�.i .
Op 4
;�,�' " �
, -
�`' �—
�� . ., o. .�._. .f. ceNrEa
sec n
-� �' .
24 3 I
=
(^� '
�
OUiiOT
. ia'
1�
�: �NH(
�-.-
OUTLO71
� �J
Sa
R �nor '
�
o�
,�
.
Eng��ieer�ng
Sewer
L'Valer
Parks
Slrcets
Maintena��ce
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �� PW93-272
�
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
DATE: July 28, 1993
SUBJECT: 64th Storm Water Project
On Tuesday, July 27, 1993, I held a public meeting with the residents in the 64th area
regarding their surface water problem. Twenty-five people attended the meeting,
representing 16 residences. Councilwoman Jorgenson was also in attendance.
At the meeting, I explained the purpose and a proposal to deal with a 10-year storm design.
Three options were covered: (1) a detention pond draining directly south into the wetland
area by the Harris Pond ditch, (2) a detention pond with a pipe outlet at 64th and Central
Avenue, and (3) a detention pond with the pipe outlet at the Harris Pond ditch Central
Avenue culvert.
The cost options for the project were $72,000, $100,000 and $120,000.
During the discussion, it was suggested that the Mississippi culvert be extended directly to
the Central Avenue culvert in lieu to a detention pond. We had not looked at this, but we
will determine a cost for this option. This option would remove all of the drainage north
of Mississippi which would have a favorable impact in the area. The consensus of the
attendees supported the construction of a detention pond and providing a pipe outlet to the
Central Avenue culvert.
We had some discussion about residents participation in funding the project. I outlined the
City's 1973 policy and indicated that if the Council would look at it, they would probably
adjust the $800 figure to approximately $1,000.
The residents requested that I draw up a petition which they propose to walk through the
neighborhood in an attempt to obtain signatures in excess of 50% for a project to submit
to the Council for inclusion in this year's construction program.
JGF:cz
�
�
€�'�°�
AME
�� -
64TH STORM WATER MEETING
JULY 27, 1993
ADDRESS-- ___._
TELEPHONE # -
��%� � � ;��
�
�-
r
�"
/ �
Jh�J ��.
� ��
� ��
��S - ._
� �
, :.�. -�
�
� ' �;,�: p.� ) �'/ "���-,.�;�� � � ,� J %= L�; �l �- �%�. � � I -�. �:� i - ; ; � � / �
���� � y���- ���� �:; �� �; _�: �, ��=��; >. � �. . � ; �_ � � �, <, �
�`�%')�-i�--n 5�,�-i--�`` -ll•-L.I,'�L t.��..1 � � �' ' ��' Y -''' �TG `-r ��=�`� r � �� " -� � � S� ._.
,��/� � ,���� t-�s; :-� !� �/�/ � �,� ,� � � I �' � ���r � �o� � �- �
✓ l
�l � � � / , j �� `
� �� ,T,,� � ;', i� , ` / Jr
r i
��
� '
L S`,- i
L\--�-� �� s �' ;
�- �� �:
; �\ � � �_ , � �. �� _ . � ;
��c � .
� � ,� , �.
\ � \ �'` "�vv `;- �� L ( ��i
�\ , ��; . _ .
2A
!b I
� _
�
.
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: September 9, 1993 �
TO: William Burns, City Manager ��
FROM:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development.Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Second Reading of an Ordinance Declaring
Certain Real Estate to be Surplus; Vacated
Broad Avenue and Lot 26, Block C, Riverview
Heights
The City Council held the first reading of the attached ordinance
at its August 2, 1993 meeting. The City Council directed staff to
revise the preliminary bikeway alignment. Attached is the revised
alignment plan. Adjustments will need to be made in the field to
ensure that the transition points in Coon Rapids and at the
intersection of Broad Avenue and Lafayette Street are smooth.
Staff recommends that the City Council hold the second reading of
the attached ordinance declaring the combined right-of-way and Lot
26 as surplus and authorizing its sale.
MM/dn
M-93-479
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY
CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE
SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF
SECTION 1 The City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract
of land within the City of Fridley, Anoka County,
State of Minnesota, described as follows:
Lot 26, Block C, Riverview Heights, Anoka County,
Minnesota, and that part of all of the vacated Broad
Avenue N.E., lying southerly of the westerly
extension of the northerly line and northerly of the
westerly extension of the southerly line of Lot 26.
Reserving and subject to easements for bikeway and
walkway purposes in favor of the City of Fridley,
over the west 15 feet and the northerly 10 feet
thereof, and northwesterly of a line drawn from
points distant 12.0 feet southerly and northeasterly
of the intersection point of the interior easement
lines. Generally located north of Lafayette Street
and south of Mississippi Boulevard.
All lying in the North Half of Section 3, Township
30, Range 24, City of Fridley, County of Anoka,
State of Minnesota.
SECTION 2 It is hereby determined by the City Council that the
City no longer has any reason to continue to own
said property, and the City Council is hereby
authorized to sell or enter into a contract to sell
said property.
SECTION 3 The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to
sign the necessary contracts and deeds to affect the
sale of said property.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1993.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
First Reading: August 2, 1993
Second Reading:
Publication:
�
[i'
�
N
��
�
�' E
J -��
�--- -
�
U
�
I`�
N
� U
�
��
..� � �
����� -�
�.
, '15"�� 9�_3,�
� W X�. �
U
z �. �
w � �
�
� x' � �
z �-- � �
�
2
z
Qx
_
U
X
1�E 9'-10"
G
�N � 6
5
-' .�� � �
�� �z M
52- ��..
'v 104°58'15" C
�
�
�
�
�
I , I
-�_.
� �''- Z.� � ,
105D 1 a' S5" M
=
�
0
0
�o
P
,
��
��,n�� �w�Y
�U �N N�t EI�Tr'
��
612 788 7602
SEP-09-1993 09�36 FROM Kurth Surveying
CERTIFtCAYE OF :
FOR LtT�C oF Ftz�v��Y
1 NEqEtlY CEPTIFY-i11�T TH1S iuRVtY, PIAN, OR REPORT WAS MEhwHED
tlY�ME OR UNOER O�NECT SYPENVISION ANCTNAT 1 AM A ONLY
NE EOIA O uHVE Y N LAwSOFTNESTAT��OF YIMI1EYCiA.
MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO.
�
�>0 ' R.IW .�:: ���
gypAO AVCs1dJL='�
r> �
��, l
, ��.,
. " � qi5�� �.Np
, � .���� ��� - � �
, _ �
�
�
t
f
�
�
N
!
1
` I'T
� b\ •:
\� .-��
,Z.��--
�
�� /
�r
� `-'� .
` � � � ,
�� ��1
� !.—
~ � 1 -..
7I
" � `�' +`�
i' � �-�� -
g�
_ i -'
�� ; . `,
�
� ;� -
� � 1
� `� � � � � t
3 �-- i�� .J
� x � - =:.
� � � l 'l/ � ��
3 ��� j-`- �: ,
t �' ;ri
� � � � 1 ^ '�,'
1 � � �%
� � - - ,�.�
� �? , �
� � � ,
� . 7 ':
, �
' �.
tn '1 c'
�
e p�' `Q, '/ ; .
� ^h v s,a r:
•; ' \��:
�
;. � � �
��� ��,�
il
>
_i
�
.�
Ib
J
�
;
�
i
�
N
i
I
� l�
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 26, Block C, RIVERVIEW I�IGHT3, Anoka Coun
all of the vacated Broad Averiue N:£., lying so'
of the northerly line and northerly of the wes
line of said Lot 26. �
Reserving and subject to easements for bikeway
the City of Fridley, over the uesterly 15 feet
thereof, and northwesterly of a li.ne drawn fro�
and northeasterly of the intersection po�f
TO 5711287 P.02
RVEY �
KURTH SURV£YING INC:
4002 JEfFERSON STRE£T N.E.
COlUM81A MEIGMTS MINNESOTA SII421
siz-�a�-aaca OATE i:8"�3
SCALE 1"� ��
O•IRON MONUMENT 4G'C
OEARINOi ARE ON AN
-- � ASSNME� OATNM
•� �� � •s�ROa noNU�T FooNo
,�� (Q)=PLAT aS?AN(.�
(�y►�G�15uiCG0
I/�/�
1
/ .+��
j r"� \
.� �� L J
..-
,�
.
.. - r' ' '�
_;-`. J "
� �
;� tr� \
.� i �
,5 � i 'a. �
� 6 S
J �°.� �% �
15'S
�
:
�.
t'
�
,
-� ,
r �
.� �
s ' ���
o°/ �
i
i.
� , � . �i
�
r
�KO• ��`~ /
/
Minnesota, and that part of
rly of the westerly extension
y extension of the southerly
walkway purposes in favor of
the northerly 10 feet
nts distant 12.0 feet southerly
interior easement lines. __
S3-ty
�
r _
�
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: September 9, 1993
TO: William Burns, City Manager ��.
�
FROM:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Steven Barg, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Second Reading of an Ordinance Amending Fridley
City Code Chapter 205, Entitled "Zoning", by
Amending Sections 205.07.06, 205.08.06,
205.09.07, and 205.10.06, and Renumbering
Consecutive Sections
The City Council conducted a public hearing regarding the attached
ordinance amendment at its August 2, 1993 meeting. The proposed
ordinance amendment creates a tie between parking facilities and
parking behavior by requiring that all parking in residential
districts occur on the required hardsurface parking stalls.
On June 23, 1993, the Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing concerning the proposed ordinance amendment. The Planning
Commission voted unanimously to recommend the City Council approve
the proposed ordinance amendment.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the second and final
reading of the attached ordinance amendment.
SB/dn
M-93-517
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE,
CHAPTER 205, ENTITLED "ZONING", BY AMENDING
SECTIONS 205.07.06, 205.08.06, 205.09.07, AND
205.10.06, AND RENUMBERING THE REMAINING
SECTIONS CONSECUTIVELY
The Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as follows:
205.07. R-1 ONE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
B. Prohibited Parking. �
No outside parking or storage of motor vehicles shall
occur except on approved hardsurface driveways and
parking stalls. �
205.08. R-2 TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
B. Prohibited Parking.
No outside parking or storage of motor vehicles shall
occur except on approved hardsurface driveways and
parking stalls.
205.09. R-3 GENERAL MULTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
7. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
B. Prohibited Parking.
No outside parking or storage of motor vehicles shall
occur except on approved hardsurface driveways and
parking stalls.
205.10. R-4 MOBILE HOME PARK DISTRICT REGULATIONS
6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
B. Prohibited Parking.
No outside parking or storage of motor vehicles shall
occur except on approved hardsurface driveways and
parking stalls.
� �
Ordinance No.
Page 2
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1993.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
Public Hearing: August 2, 1993
First Reading: August 16, 1993
Second Reading:
Publication:
� •
r._--
5
1/ii�,' g' � ,;,�.�\\\
��j- - - �'����
� '
� {�.
�
��.
\�� r
��l
DATE JULY 7
FROM pTTRT,T�
SUBJECT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
1993
City of Fridley
Minnesota
CITY CODE, CHAPTER 102
AMENDMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO
BILL BURNS
The attached amendment to the Fridley City Code Chapter 102
entitled "Police" is submitted for Council consideration.
ACTION INFO
X
The amendment is desirable to accommodate a position classification
change due to my retirement from "Assistant City Manager/Public
Safety Director" to "Public Safety Director."
JPH/sa
l•:
�
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE,
CHAPTER 102 ENTITLED "POLICE," BY AMENDING
SECTION 102.03
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
102.b3. ABOLISHMENT OF THE POSITION OF CHIEF OF POLICE
The office of Chief of Police of the City of Fridley is hereby
abolished and the duties of said office are assigned to and
combined with the duties of the �i�-t-a�rt -E���-�age�/Public
Safety Director. (Ref. 575)
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Fridley this
day oF 1993.
Attest:
William A. Champa, City Clerk
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
. �
William J. Nee - Mayor
f
4
CITY OF FRIDLEY
M E M O R A N D II M
,��•
TO:
WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �!��
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCE DIRBCTOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA� CITY CLERR
SIIBJECT: MINNESOTA LAWFIIL GAMBLING PRFMISE PERMIT RENFWAL
APPLICATION FOR FRIDLEY JAYCEES AT SANDEES RESTAIIRANT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1993
Attached is a resolution approving the renewal application for a
Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit for Fridley Jaycees at
Sandees Restaurant located at 6490 Central Avenue.
The Minnesota Gambling Control Board requires the adoption of a
resolution approving or denying this premise permit renewal
application. These applications expire every two years.
7
RF,�OLir!'I�T 1�U. - 2993
•I:r� • 1 •! � � 1 ' ' �1'.I •1' �+� •: ' � • 1� I I�ti=• v�
� r• i: � •�:,� �:�� •:,�•� � • u �+:�:,ti
Wf�2EA.S, the City of Fridley has been served with a ca�y of a Rex�nral
Ap�lication for a Minnesota I�wful Gambling Premise Fermit for Fridley Jaycees;
and
Wf�REAS, the location of the Premise P�ermit is for Saridees Restaurant, 6490
Central Avenue; aryd
Wf�S, the City of FYidley has nat four�d ariy reason to restrict the location
for the chari�able gambling operati�.
NOW, Ti�F+ORE, BE IT FtESOLUID, that the City Council of the City of Fridley
appraves the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Pre�nise P�ermit to Fridley Jayaees.
PASSED AND ADOP'I'ED BY � CITY C7C�lNCIL OF � CI'I'Y OF FRIDIEY TFIIS 13'Iii DAY OF
SEPI�II2, 1993. '
rvM��.��
WILLIAM A. C�iAMPA - CITY CL�RK .
7A
WILLIAM J. 1� - MAYOR
CITY OF FRIDLEY
M E M O R A N D II M
TO:
WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER �n'a
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCE DIRECTOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERR
SIIBJECT: MINNESOTA LAWFIIL GAMBLING PREMISE PERMIT RENEWAL
APPLICATION FOR FRIDLEY JAYC13E8 AT JOE DIMAGGIOS
DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1993
Attached is a resolution approving the renewal application for a
Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit for Fridley Jaycees at Joe
Dimaggios Restaurant located at 1298 East Moore Lake Drive.
The Minnesota Gambling Control Board requires the adoption of a
resolution approving or denying this premise permit renewal
application. These applications expire every two years.
E��
RES07�TPI�iT I�U. - 1993
i•�:�_ • i •; � : � • • •�•� •i- v� • • • • n � i:,� • v•
• ^i � r• i:i � • •�� � :�: • :,i•� � • • n ���
�EAS, the City of Fridley has been setved with a copy of a R�enew�al
Application for a Minnesota Iawful Gambling Premise P�ermit for Fridley Jayoees;
ar�d
�E'.AS, the location of the Preqnise P�ermit is for Joe DiMaggios Restaurant,
1298 East Moore Iake Drive; arra
W�REAS, the City of Fridley has not fcauxi arty reason to restrict the location
for the charitable gambling c�peration.
NO�W, Tf�REFnRE, B� IT RFSOLUED, that the City Cbuncil of the City of Fridley
ap�raves the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Pr�nise Permit to Fridley Jayoees.
PASSID AND ADOPTID BY Zi� CITY CX7[7NCII, OF Zi� QTY OF FRIDI�Y TI�S 13TH DAY OF
SEPl'II�ER, 1993.
�
�, ►• i. . 44 i+ x; �/
. �
�• �
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
� _
�
.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Community Development Department
P�vrriNG DrvISION
City of Fridley
September 9, 1993 � .
William Burns, City Manager ,�.�
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Steven Barg, Planning Assistant
Junk Yard License Renewal/Sam's Auto Parts
On May 3, 1993, the City Council tabled consideration
junk yard license renewal for Sam's Auto Parts due
parking concern. On June 7, 1993, the City Counc.
temporary 90 day license enabling Sam's Auto Part:
operating its business through the summer months. Th�
directed staff to work with the property owner to
issue, and further added that the matter should be
September for issuance of the regular annual license
regarding revocation of Sam's special use permit.
of the annual
to an ongoing
il approved a
� to continue
a City Council
resolve this
considered in
or discussion
In mid-June, staff inet with Sam Giddings, owner of Sam's Auto
Parts. At that time, Mr. Giddings indicated that he woul.d make an
effort to keep the customer and employee parking areas clear and
work to ensure that vehicles brought to their business were placed
inside the junk yard fence as soon as possible.
During the past month, staff has monitored this site to determ�ne
whether or not an on-street parking problem exists. Although some
inspections revealed that 7-9 vehicles were parked on 73 1/2 Avenue
near Sam's, they were divided between the two sides of the 73 1/2
Avenue and spaced such that the street was not unduly congested and
individual vehicles did not appear to be parked for excessive
periods of time. Based on these observations, it is staff's
opinion that there is not an on-street parking problem which is
significant enough to warrant revocation of Sam's special use
permit at this time. (I have attached a table showing the
informatior. recorded during these recent site inspections.)
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the junk yard
license renewal for Sam's Auto Parts at its September 13, 1993
meeting. This license will ailow Sam's to operate through April
30, 1994. During this time, staff will continue to conduct
periodic inspections on 73 1/2 Avenue and will update the City
Council regarding further problems.
SB/dn M-93-519
CONDITIONS OBSERVED ON 73RD AVENUE N.E.
(Both sides of the street near Sam's Auto Parts)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Date Time Number of Vehicles
Observed
----------------------------------------------------------------
8/18/93
8/21/93
8/22/93
8/24/93
8/27/93
8/28/93
8/28/93
8/29/93
9/7/93
2:45 p.m.
6:00 p.m.
12:20 p.m.
11:30 a.m.
11:15 a.m.
1:30 p.m.
6:30 p.m.
5:00 p.m.
10:30 a.m.
Nine
Zero
Zero
Seven
Eight
* Fifteen
Zero
Three
Eight
* Vehicles observed during this inspection have been confirmed
to have been the responsibility of Fridley Auto Parts.
Apparently, Fridley Auto Parts had a special delive�� ofy�" �
_(,,.%.�c� �_�- � .� � / -t� f��tii� ���_/ �' �,-i� �_�c.�.� �� �'' U'°-�-..� Q-z�,�L�'�-ri7 �r%
a� � �--.� _
�� 9A � ��._-� �� � ,
CITY OF FRIDLEY
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Stouffer called the July 18, 1993, CATV Advisory
Commission meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present: Ralph Stouffer, Robert Scott, Burt Weaver,
Paul Kaspszak �
Members Absent: None �
Others Present: Clyde Moravetz, City of Fridley
Mark Hammerstrom, Nartel Cable
Dave Harvett, Media & Communications,
Fridley Schools
Bill Willis, 1663-68th Avenue NE, Fridley,
Minnesota
APPROVAL OF APRIL 28 1993 CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Weaver, to approve the
April 28, 1993, CATV Advisory Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOIIFFER DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY. -
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
Mr. Stouffer suggested the addition of an Open Microphone for Mr.
Willis prior to agenda Item I and, under V. Other Business, the
addition of the Recognition of Service for Duane Peterson.
MOTION by Mr. Weaver, seconded by Mr. Scott, to approve the agenda
as amended.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOIIFFER DECLARED
T8E MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
OPEN MICROPHONE:
Mr. Willis stated he came to the meeting because he is a new
resident, and he had read there was a cable commission. He has
been a subscriber of cable services around the Twin Cities and has
been involved in one form or another since it started. Primariiy,
he is an interested citizen who is present to see what goes on,
�
�"—
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE Z
what authority the Commission has, and the City's relationship with
Nortel. He is also interested in seeing the services improved.
He has seen problems in the three months he has had service here
and has concerns.
Mr. Stouffer provided an overview of the Commission which is an
advisory commission to the City Council. The Commission oversees
the rules and regulations governing cable in the city. Nortel has
a 15-year franchise which goes to 2003. Nortel is now in its sixth
year of service.
Mr. Kaspszak stated the Commission is advisory. There is no final
authority here.
Mr. Moravetz stated the Commission meets quarterly on the fourth
Wednesday of January, April, July and October.
Mr. Scott provided information on the Fridley Communications
Workshop. Mr. Moravetz can provide additional information if
interested.
Mr. Willis stated he had noted interesting information on the
public access channel. He is at the meeting on a learning basis,
and he will participate as much as is allowed.
I. NORTEL REPORTS
A. 2nd Quarter 1993 Franchise Fee
Mr. Moravetz stated information on the second quarter
franchise fee was included with the agenda. There was
an error in the payment which will be adjusted in the
next payment. As previously requested, Nortel has
provided a comparison with earlier quarters.
Mr. Stouffer asked if the number of customers has reached
a plateau.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated the maximum number of subscribers
in the City was about 5,200. This drifts somewhat but
is a steady system.
Mr. Stouffer asked how the $2.U0 coupon went.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated it went fairly well. Even with
the coupon, the response depends on the titles. It
probably pushed the buy rates up 1% or 2�.
MOTION by Mr. Weaver, seconded by Mr. Scott, to receive
the 2nd Quarter Franchise Fee.
10A
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28. 1993 PAGE 3
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOIIFFER
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY.
B. Update of Five Year Renegotiation and Evaluation of
Franchise Report
Mr. Moravetz stated that on April 28, the CATV Commission
approved the five-year review and evaluation. The City
Council received it with no further action. The
franchise mandate for the five-year evaluation is
essentially closed.
II. LETTER FROM DR. RENS, SCHOOL DISTRICT #14 SUPERINTENDENT,
DATED JUNE 24, 1993:
a. Receive
MOTION by Mr. Kaspszak, seconded by Mr. Weaver, to
receive the letter from Dr. Rens, School District #14
Superintendent, dated June 24, 1993.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOOFFER
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
b. Evaluate and Make Recommendation to Councii
Mr. Kaspszak stated that in dealing with this agenda
item, he will be as objective in approaching this matter
as is humanly possible; and he would hope that the City
Council would also approach this issue as objectively as
possible.
Mr. Stouffer suggested the Commission members first
discuss any concerns and then receive comments from
staff.
Mr. Weaver suggested Mr. Harvett provide an opening
statement.
Mr. Harvett stated he thought this proposal will help the
schools, not only within the schools but also the
community, by having a new character generator and the
information on that character generator. They can keep
it more updated and allow more information on the
channel. The school does not have that capability now.
What is there now is behind the times, needs to be
updated, and that is what they are trying to do. Even
if the request were approved, the school would not have
24-hour programming overnight. They need to first get
the equipment and go from there. They now have the
technology of a camcorder. They use, and have used in
1:
CATV ADVIBORY COMMI88ION MESTING� JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 4
the past, the Fridley public access. They run into
transportation liability. In the past, students drove
to the Fridley facility with a permission note from their
parents. The schools are no longer able to do that so
they now must rent a bus which is costly for transferring
students four blocks.
Mr. Kaspszak asked why this changed.
Mr. Harvett stated the funds are not there for trans-
ferring students.
Mr. Moravetz suggested the policy for transferring
students was a change made by the new high school
principal last year.
Mr. Kaspszak asked how students from Totino-Grace get to
the Nortel facility.
Mr. Harvett stated he did not know.
Mr. Scott stated it is four blocks from the high school
to Nortel facility. Can the students not walk?
Mr. Harvett stated that if you are trying to run a course
on 20th Century Communications and have that equipment
there during a free hour or before and after school,
having the students walk to the facility is not feasible.
By doing this, they are not trying to duplicate what
public access is offering. They are trying to get a
start of that technology and then flow students over to
public access.
Mr. Scott has if they were planning to build a studio
facility at the high school.
Mr. Harvett stated this has been discussed. This would
be an ideal plan, but it may not happen.
Mr. Scott asked if 20th Century Communications is a
required course.
Mr. Harvett stated it is not a required course. Yt is
an elective English course students can take which
includes various productions and radio communications.
In this course at the present time, they are talking
about the technology available. They would like to
provide some hands-on experience with that technology.
Not evsry student that takes the course is going to have
the interest as other students.
10C
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 5
Mr. Kaspszak asked what makes the Scala character
generator more user-friendly and what currently prohibits
students from putting information on the current
generator. •
Mr. Harvett stated the students use an Apple II-GS which
is a computer, not a character generator. When we first
put that in, we were told they were going to buy upgrade
software. This has not happened. To use, a person must
format a background, a border and every line individ-
ually. Each time you run out of space, that line must
be re�ormatted. One could spend 15-20 minutes on a high
data page before having one page prepared. By the time
it is shut down off the channel, place the tape, etc.,
there is not enough time to work with the students. This
unit is not user-friendly.
Mr. Moravetz asked how old this character generator was.
Mr. Harvett stated he did not know the age. It is an
Apple II-GS computer using the software, Slide Show.
They have used the software for approximately six years.
They have had calls from the community that this is not
updated fast enough because there is not enough time to
spend on updating. They are trying to get more
information out but are limited with what we can do.
Mr. Kaspszak asked what kind of information would people
be requesting.
Mr. Harvett stated they ask for lunch menus, sporting
events, school closings, etc. Rather than have several
calls, this information could be placed on the channel.
The equipment would also make the channel easier and
friendlier to watch.
Mr. Scott stated this then is basically a school bulletin
board function.
Mr. Harvett stated this would be displayed on the
educational access channel.
Mr. Scott stated this could be printed in the Focus.
Mr. Harvett stated, yes, it could, but there is other
information they would like to be able to do on a quick
basis rather than send it in one day per week to try to
get this information up. In trying to shut down the
system, if the system crashes, all memory is lost. They
would like to be able to save the information and update
it on a regular basis.
10D
CATV ADVISORY COMMiSBION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 6
Mr. Kaspszak asked if this is something that the school
has been building towards for a long time or has tried
other ways of getting this equipment. How long has this
been a problem and how long have people struggling with
it? This is the first time he had heard there was a
problem.
Mr. Harvett stated they have been trying to get a
character generator for some time. Each time they
propose it to a new place, we try to stay up to date and
cost efficient. They are trying to get something that
will change. With this equipment, we can add to it by
changing the software. There are other options out
there.
Mr. Moravetz asked the rationale in the budget process
over the years. The request is for approximately $3,000
which is less than .l� of the school district's budget.
Mr. Harvett stated he is not involved in the budget
process. Dr. Rens would be able to answer that question.
This request was proposed to the VFW and, he thought, the
Lions Club in the past few years.
Mr. Kaspszak stated he was concerned about INET. INET
is not being used. Is there any other equipment the
school has gotten which is not being used? His concern
is that there is a limited budget and that the funds will
be spent on equipment and this equipment will just sit
there. What assurances are there that this will be use'd
and that this is a good investment? � �
Mr. Harvett stated he did not think there is anything in
writing that would do that. There are students who have
personally purchased equipment and brought it in to do
this type of work and, for some reason, they lose
interest by the time it gets to public access. There is
nothing in writing that shows the number of students that
will use the equipment for a specified number of hours.
But, the need is there.
Mr. Kaspszak stated INET was built and has not been used.
If there any other pieces of equipment not being used?
Mr. Harvett stated they are looking at using INET with
the computer and video hook-ups, if it will transfer.
Mr. Moravetz asked if there was money in the 1993-94
budget for that.
10E
CATV ADVI$ORY COMMISSION M$$TING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE ?
Mr. Harvett stated he could not answer that question.
If there are funds, it would come out of the computer
technology area.
Mr. Moravetz asked if the computer technology area of the
budget had been significantly increased over the last few
years.
Mr. Harvett stated he did not know. He does know that
capital has been cut in some cases to zero, but he did
not-know what is happening in other departments. He does
not have that information.
Mr. Weaver stated Mr. Harvett had said they do not have
the facilities in place to use more equipment. Is there
space to house this equipment?
Mr. Harvett stated this would replace the existing
character generator in the same amount of space.
Mr. Weaver stated the character generator amounts to
approximately $3,300. It looks as if the request is for
$14,700. What about the editing equipment? Where is
that to be placed?
Mr. Harvett stated it wduld be placed in the media center
also.
Mr. Weaver asked if the media center was a drop in place
for students or are classes scheduled to use this
equipment.
Mr. Harvett stated that at this point, there are no
scheduled classes to use this equipment, because we do
not have the equipment. They cannot propose a class
without it.
Mr. Weaver asked what is the school district's budget
level for funding this effort. They are talking about
some school functions. He is trying to determine how
dedicated the school is for this. Have they set aside
a special amount of money to hire someone or are they
still in a start up mode?
Mr. Harvett stated the plan is to train students and
staff under his supervision.
Mr. Weaver stated it had been mentioned that the school
had been to the VFW and Lions Club also for this funding.
What has been their response to this request?
10F
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 8
Mr. Harvett stated he did not know their response.
Mr. Moravetz asked that in his discussions with Dr. Rens,
has the school district put aside funds such as matching
funds.
Mr. Harvett stated he did not know.
Mr. Weaver requested Mr. Harvett to tell how the proposed
equipment would increas� the use by the school. What
capabilities will this give you and how would you project
the increase in the use?
Mr. Harvett stated the plan initialZy is to get involved
1) within the classrooms, 2) within the student
interests, and 3) in other classes rather English and
20th Century Communication classes. Then, open it up to
social studies where students could do a video project.
Now students have the capability to shoot a project but
no other ability. They would extend that ability to use
new technology and hands on learning with the students.
We would open it up to the middle schools and elementary
schools. Like the other channels, when it is not being
used, open it up for other channels for access.
Mr. Weaver stated what he had in mind with the term,
existing capability,.was the use of the existing INET.
He did not notice anything mentioned that this will be
used.
Mr. Harvett stated this has
This would be used for the
The INET is a closed system
the community.
nothing to do with the INET.
programming on the channel.
where it is not going out to
Mr. Weaver stated INET interconnects the schools but not
necessarily the schools to the community.
Mr. Scott stated item #2 in Dr. Rens letter taZks about
the fact that you have camcorders to shoot video and
refers to classroom projects. Mr. Scott is assuming this
is talking about projects using camcorders.
Mr. Harvett stated, yes, camcorders are used for health
classes, English classes, social studies classes, etc.
Camcorders are used throughout the system. They may be
used for personal projects, to videotape a class, staff
development meetings, etc.
Mr. Scott stated this sounds as if it is for classroom
activities for which students are getting credit, just
10G
CATV ADVISORY COMMIS$ION MEBTING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 9
as they have desks, blackboards, chalk, etc. Dr. Rens
states that there would be increased educational access
to the community but he has not heard any mention of
that. He asked if some of these student projects might
be cable-cast on Channel 32.
Mr. Harvett stated this is correct.
Mr. Moravetz asked if the proposed equipment would be
more af a switcher-type of operation as opposed to
editing.
Mr. Harvett stated it could be set up as a type of
switcher but it can also be used as a post-production
editor.
Mr. Weaver stated, theoretically, let us say that you do
get this plan underway. What would the school's
capability bring to the community that does not already
exist with the Workshop?
Mr. Harvett stated this would happen by showing the
proj ects or some other ideas that would occur from having
this equipment. There are going to be more doors that
this equipment will open up rather than what we are now
doing. If someone records, for example, the fifth grade
concert in Stevenson that public access is not covering,
they can take that tape back, edit and title it. These
are the types of things they would like to start doing.
Mr. Weaver stated it is then not possible for the school
to get equipment on loan from the Workshop, go to the
school and videotape, use the existing editing capability
and then have that broadcast. Is there some shortcoming
of that system that prohibits the school from using the
equipment?
Mr. Harvett stated, no. The school has an organizational
membership with them and we can use their equipment when
we schedule it. They cannot take that equipment to the
high school and edit within the high school.
Mr. Weaver asked if scheduling was a problem.
Mr. Harvett stated he did not think so. They are looking
at a system that is in a different area. This is a
geographic problem.
Mr. Kaspszak stated he thought all agreed with the need
for the students to be exposed to the equipment. The
idea is fine, but the point is there is a limited of
10H
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JQLY 28, 1993 PAGE 10
funds that can be allocated. Fourteen thousand dollars
is a lot of money. Secondly, is this the best way to use
the funds? This just came up. The letter came and this
is the first that anyone had heard about the request.
He is not sure we can make a decision tonight because we
do not have all the answers. It gets back to why the
existing is not working. Classes have been taught by the
Workshop for the school. In 1992, the Workshop
instructor was designated as lay teacher of the year by
the school. This shows that the relationship is working.
That is why we are analyzing the current system. If the
current system is working or needs to be modified to
address those needs, then that would be the preferred
way.
Mr. Harvett stated the relationship between the school
and the Workshop has been good.
Mr. Kaspszak asked Mr. Hammerstrom, if money comes out
of the equipment fund, is there a problem with Nortel
maintaining that equipment.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated he would have to look at the
franchise to see how it is worded. From a practical
sense, he would have difficulty supporting equipment that
is not on site, that Nortel does not have an owning
interest, and operated by people they have no control
over or without rules governing use. Operationally, this
would be a problem.
Mr. Kaspszak stated the City has a cable fund. As of
January 1, 1993, is there any money in this fund not
generated this year?
Mr. Moravetz stated there have been transfers from the
cable fund in the past few years.
Mr. Kaspszak asked if there was a projected budget
surplus for this year.
Mr. Moravetz stated there was a projected surplus but he
did not know the anticipated amount offhand.
Mr. Kaspszak asked if, after January 1, there was no
money in this account and that any excess monies were
transferred to the General Fund. If there any account
that this money can be drawn from for cable-related
matters?
101
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28. 1993 PAGE.11
Mr. Moravetz stated there is a possibility to take the
money or a portion of that money out of the 5� franchise
fee as opposed to the equipment money.
Mr. Kaspszak asked if there money leftover in some other
account.
Mr. Moravetz stated other funds were used up in the
remodeling of City Hall with the cable equipment.
Mr. Kaspszak stated there is a desire to satisfy the
needs of the school but make funds available for the
community's use. Perhaps there is way to achieve both.
Mr. Stouffer asked that at this time, what is the
direction the Commission wishes to take. The Commission
can table or make a recommendation.
Mr. Scott stated the City Council referred this issue to
the Commission. The superintendent addressed the City
Manager. Do they have the luxury of tabling and not
making a recommendation? Will the City Council consider
the request without a recommendation?
Mr. Stouffer stated he thought the City Council is
looking for a. recommendation. There are unanswered
questions, and it would have been nice to have had Dr.
Rens present. He would not have a problem with tabling
this issue for that reason.
Mr. Scott stated he would submit that the Commission does
not know what the recommendation will be at this time.
Mr. Stouffer stated that in getting this request from the
Council and since the Commission will not meet for
another three months, a special meeting could be set.
He feels their intent is that the Commission should take
some action.
Mr. Weaver stated he is not convinced that the City
Council would like the Commission to take action just for
the sake of taking action. There are some questions that
still need to be addressed regarding the school budget.
He would like to see some answers to these questions
before taking a position.
Mr. Scott stated he is bothered by this request and the
case made for it. He did not hear about community access
but rather heard about classes. If these classes exist,
he was sure they were valuable for student experience.
But classes require all kinds of materials. Schools
10J
CATV ADVI80RY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 12
provide the materials for these classes. It appears that
the equipment being talked about is primarily for the use
of students in classes. Chalk is much cheaper than
equipment, but chalk is necessary for the classroom, and
the school through its budget and its management should
provide chalk, which they should buy, as they should buy
camcorders which are used for taping classes or projects
for students. If students require editing equipment for
its classes, the school should also provide that
equipment. The newspaper can provide information on
lunch menus and schedules for the school. He sees no
reason for waiting to make a recommendation.
Mr. Weaver stated he did not disagree, but possibly there
is some money the schools are providing, and he would
like to know that.
Mr. Stouffer stated that as an educator by profession,
he understands the reasoning for the media. This
Commission and Nortel services Fridley. Fridley is made
up of four school districts. If we give part of the
money to Fridley, it will set a precedent to provide
funds for the other districts as well. They are all
agencies which can generate their own funds. He
understands the money is available for local access, but
if he provides funds for local access he wants it to be
the maximum for the most people rather than for special
interest. Irregardless of the sound rationale for
needing equipment for classes, the other agencies will
also be requesting funds for their own niches. He
believes that the money is for the general good of the
community. This is only for the Fridley school system.
Mr. Harvett stated he hoped he had not misled the
Commission. This equipment is going toward educational
access, not within the school. They are not going to
take this equipment and restrict use to only school
members, students, etc. They are not trying to duplicate
a public access. To open our doors to the community to
use equipment is what public access is for. They are
trying to build on what we have right now which is
educational access. By adding this character generator
they would be building on that.
Mr. Kaspszak stated there has not been an extensive
attempt by the school to try to put programming on the
channel. When the concerts seem to be done, the Workshop
does it as a community service. He is not sure that
students are getting involved.
i0K
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28. 1993 PAG$ 13
Mr. Harvett stated there are students getting involved
with these activities.
Mr. Kaspszak stated the interest is there and it shows
that the existing equipment is working. In the beginning
of public access, they had a reel-to-reel VCR and they
put on a program. It is nice to have the graphics, etc. ,
but it does not take much to shoot a concert, put it on
the air and have everyone like it. That is the kind of
stuff that is already happening at the school.
Mr. Harvett stated students want to better themselves on
what they have right now.
Mr. Moravetz stated the Commission could recommend denial
of funds, recommend a percentage, or could recommend
matching funds. These funds would not necessarily have
to come out of the equipment grant. It could be taken
out of the 5% franchise fee monies. In this way, it
would not handicap the public access. As you know, the
money they get from the City franchise fee merely defrays
the public access operational expenses. Whereas the
school district has their own budget, ETC does not have
that lum�ry. They have only this equipment grant money
for purchasing equipment. These are the basic choices.
Mr. Moravetz stated the request of $14,740 reflects less
than .lo of 1% of the school budget. What is the
district channel budget for 1993, 1994 and beyond? Mr.
Harvett does not have that information. What are the
good faith plans of the school? We are looking at
duplication of equipment here on already limited funds
for equipment. The school district is now a member of
the ETC and is using public equipment as it is available.
The INET has been discussed. The Commission put in a lot
of time, when refranchising, to reach the goal of
mandating the cable operator provide the INET, which they
did at the time of the rebuild; and the INET is still
sitting there and not being used. The track record of
the school district for channel usage, other than the
character generator, has been pretty much non-existent.
The chairman already indicated the unfavorable precedent
for other school districts and the library in the City.
Mr. Harvett stated he thought this money is set aside for
access stations in Fridley.
Mr. Moravetz stated ETC's only source of money for
equipment comes from the equipment grant of the
franchise. The 5a franchise fee monies they receive
basical�y covers their operating expenses only.
10L
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 14
III.
IV.
Maintenance of equipment housed outside of Nortel's
studios was commented on by Mr. Hammerstrom from a
practical standpoint. School events and activities are
currently being cable casted by LO or public access,
staff and volunteers. These points made are not intended
to be supportive or adversarial, they are just facts.
MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Weaver, to recommend
this request not be favored; that the Commission has
heard a long Iist of reasons why and he would stress the
major portion of the proposed expenditure would be for
equipment for use in the classroom; further that there
are several school districts in the City and that this
does set a precedent which is probably not wise; that the
other school districts could ask the City Council for
support for their needs; that there is little money for
access equipment available; and because of the location
Nortel would not be able to maintain the equipment.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, C$AIRPER30N STOIIFFER
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
(E.T.C.) Fridley Communications Workshop:
a. 2nd Quarter Report to. City Including Statistics and
Financial Report
MOTION by Mr. Weaver, seconded by Mr. Scott, to receive
the 2nd Quarter Report to the City including statistics
and financial report.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOIIFFER
DECLARED TIiE MOTION CARRIED ONANIMOUSLY.
b. June Director's Report
MOTION by Mr. Scott, seconded by Mr. Kaspszak, to receive
the June Director's Report.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STODFFER
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY.
CATV LEGISLATIVE UPDATE (FCC REPORT AND ORDER):
a. Rate Regulation
Mr. Moravetz stated the FCC initially required June 21
to be the deadline to apply for certification for rate
regulation. It was then set at October 1, and this has
now been changed to September 1. He will be attending
a conference held at Moss & Barnett Law Firm to go over
10M
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 15
the new FCC rules and regulations and customer service
standards. This seminar is scheduled for August 18.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated this is the biggest issue that has
hit us as an industry since deregulation. The original
act went into effect late last year when Congress
overrode the President's veto. They had originally
intended this portion of the law to go into effect in
mid-June. The FCC was given no funding, they had no
staff, no work space, and they put it off until
October 1. They did now get the funding and are pushing
up the implementation date to September 1. This means
our rates have to determined before September l and
whatever winds up having the final impact on these rates
must be determined and in place by September l. He will
give the Commission an idea of what he e�cpects the impact
to be, and provide an objective overview of what the City
is looking at in terms of regulation, what can and cannot
be regulated, the process that must be taken, and what
needs to be done for certification.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated it is up to the Commission or the
City Council to request regulation. He has tried a
number of different scenarios to see what the best thing
would be for Nortel. As it is now, there is not a big
difference to Nortel whether the City elects to file to
regulate rates or not. Their relationship has been good
enough that he would prefer to deal at a local level with
the rate issue rather than with the FCC in Washington.
The rules are still open for interpretation. The law
creates three groups who can set rates - the City, the
FCC, or the cable company.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated the City has been given the
authority, if they decide that they want to file for the
authority, to regulate the basic level af service or the
$7.95 rate presently charged. In addition to that, the
equipment plus installation fees associated with basic
are also regulated by the City. If the City decides not
to file for authority, the FCC will regulate the whole
works. If the City does file, the FCC will regulate only
that portion above the basic which they refer to as the
cable services portion or, in our case, the satellite
tier. The cable operator continues to be able to
regulate their rates for pay-for-view, premium seryices
and "a la carte" services. The FCC created a series of
"baskets". The rules are over 500 pages. He received
them the first part of May and is still working on them.
He can provide an general idea of what the rates are
going to be but there may be some last minute
10N
�
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MLETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 16
modifications. There are still some things pending with
the FCC.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated in the baskets are grouped basic
service, equipment, and then cable services. The goal
is to try to reach a benchmark rate which is determined
on the basis of a cents per channel per month per
subscriber basis for a given level of service above which
we cannot go, below which we are okay but cannot increase
rates until the rate freeze expires in November.
Essentially what they have to do is take all of our
revenue, throw it into basic, extract our equipment
costs, extract our satellite costs, and then determine
individually whether or not our rate matches those
estabTished benchmarks. In effect, the City cannot say
that a$2.95 remote control fee is too high. The FCC has
established a method of coming up with a calculation for
the cable operator to come up with the actual cost of
that device given a reasonable profit over time. They
are trying to achieve a total rev�nue per subscriber
picture.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated that before September 1, cable
companies can adjust rates or tiers, add programming or
take off programming, provided that program does not
reach beyond the benchmark rate. This essentially places
the burden of revenue for the cable operator under
different items. For example, they do not expect basic
service to change. The satellite tier will probably not
change either. In fact, the benefit is that there will
probably be the addition of three satellite channels.
There will probably be a reduction of the add outlet fees
from $4.95 to 75-80 cents per month. The remote fees
will go down from $2.95 to about 20-30 cents per month.
There will be a monthly converter rental fee of about
$2.00 per month. Someone who now has basic and satellite
with an additional outlet or remote control will see some
savings. Someone with basic only and no converter will
probably see no change. Someone with basic and a remote
will see a $3.00 increase.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated the reason the FCC is doing this
is to place the burden for applying on the actual piece
of equipment which winds up bearing the cost. We are in
full compliance with the law. The statement that
customers would see 10% lower rates was not accurate.
Most people will actually see an increase in rates as a
result of the FCC's benchmark rates.
Mr. Moravetz asked if there are benchmarks established
for the add-on outlets and converter or remote boxes
100
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 17
also. How did Mr. Hammerstrom come to those anticipated
reductions?
Mr. Hammerstrom stated there were rather detailed
worksheets included in the 500+ pages of regulations
which are very similar to income tax forms. With the
equipment, that is essentially taken out of the gross
revenues how much the equipment rental charges are a
portion of that and allocating that revenue to rental of
the piece of equipment.
Mr. Moravetz asked if there is an industry standard or
norm.for each piece of equipment?
Mr. Hammerstrom stated these are being separated out.
Mr. Weaver stated the more features the customer wants
the more they will pay.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated, ironically, the people that have
the most invested in technology and have the most
converters in the field today are the operators that will
see the largest rollback. They are actually being
penalized for having equipment in the field. Some of the
systems operated will not be touched at all because they
have 1'ittle equipment. In their case, that is where the
revenue came from. Through the benchmark calculation
process, back to the box and the actual handheld remote
control fees are dropped.
Mr. Weaver stated basic would then remain the same with
the three additional channels.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated that if for no other reason than
a word for the wise, when looking at rates at the local
level, Mr. Moravetz will see all the steps that must be
gone through to arrive at these rates. The question
becomes what is the benefit to the City.
Mr. Weaver stated the problem is what choice do we have.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated this is the difficult point. From
a political standpoint, there is no choice. It is coming
up to election time. From a standpoint of not submitting
for authorization to regulate, it will look like the City
does not care. As a forewarning, take a close look at
the amount of paperwork and the burden this is going to
place on City staff.
10P
�
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGE 18
Mr. Kaspszak asked how many basic subscribers there are.
It seems that all this work will benefit a handful of
people.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated that portion of basic is also a
portion of satellite. If they raise the basic service
rate, it would affect the every subscriber.
Mr. Hammerstrom reviewed the timetable. September 1 is
the first day that the City can apply to the FCC for
certification. Thirty days later, if the City has not
heard from the FCC, you are certified. Once that has
happened, Nortel must be notified and a copy of the rates
requested. This puts into place a definite timetable
which must be withheld.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated the FCC wants the acceptance of
the rates with a specific timeframe. Thirty days after
Nortel provides the notification of rates, the rates must
be certified or the City can ask for a 120-day extension
in order to ask for information. If they feel the
benchmarks are too low, that there are mitigating costs
within the community that justifies a higher rate, access
fees for example,. and we feel they can justify a higher
basic level rates by showing a cost of service
justification for the rate, Nortel can file a petition
with the City saying we can demonstrate on a cost-of-
service basis that are rates should be a specified
amount. The City than has 150 days to say the cost-of-
service showing is accurate. It is not just a routine
stamp. Thi.s is quite detailed.
Mr. Moravetz stated the simple things the City must do
in order to regulate rates is i) apply for certification
through the FCC and send a copy of the request to the
cable operator; 2) amend the cable ordinance or adopt a
separate ordinance consistent with the FCC regulations,
and within 120 days of certification, the City shall
follow the rules relating to the rate regulation mandated
by the FCC; and 3) notify the cable operator that steps
1 and 2 have been completed and the City will regulate
the rates....Then it becomes more time consuming.
Mr. Moravetz stated he had talked to Bloomington. They
are in a different situation with a greater number of
subscribers and greater cable revenues. They are going
to apply for certification just for the sake of keeping
the doors open for the future, as we discussed earlier.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated, once the City applies for
certification, it sets a process in motion and the City
10Q
CATV ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING. JIILY 28, 1993 PAGS 19
must go through the process of certifying rates. This
is what Nortel's legal advisor is saying.
Mr. Weaver asked Mr. Moravetz when he would be attending
the seminar.
Mr. Moravetz stated the seminar is on August 18 in
Minneapolis. The City can apply for certification three
years from now, but September 1 is the earliest one can
apply. There are still questions that must be answered.
Mr. Weaver stated, with the number of applications, there
is no way the FCC can go through all the applications in
that time.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated that is the reason for the
default.
Mr. Hammerstrom stated, with the City if the benchmarks
are approved, any subscriber can complain in writing to
the FCC about the rates charged. The FCC will then
investigate. The FCC is trying to be as flexible as they
can. There may be some accommodation made. Nortel is
going to be in compliance with the benchmarks and will
provide a letter to Mr. Moravetz as to the changes in
rates. Subscriber notices must go out with the bilZs at
the end of August in order to comply with the short
deadline. Things are moving very quickly.
b. Customer Service Standards
Mr. Hammerstrom distributed copies of
Service Standards portion of the law.
mandated that we reach certain standards.
elect to enforce them, and the City needs
days notification of their intent to
standards. At this point, Nortel would
compliance with the standards.
the Customer
The FCC has
The City can
to provide 90
enforce the
have to be in
Mr. Hammerstrom stated the law provides that local
broadcast stations now have a choice of whether or not
to be carried on a cable system. They can elect what is
called "must carry", in which case the cable system must
carry them by law on the channel they designate. There
are not fees and no restraints. The cable operator has
to have them on. Or, they can elect to "retransmission
consent" whereby they have to come to the cable operator
and say what they want and, in exchange, we carry their
product. If the operator does not agree to do this, then
the station will not let the cable operator carry that
channel in the system. Our policy is that Nortel is not
10R
CATV ADVISORY COMMI$SION MEETING JIILY 28 1993 PAGE 20
going to pay cash compensation for carrying local
broadcast stations. That is not an uncommon stance
throughout the industry, but rather prevalent practice.
At the moment, Channels 2, 9, 17 and 23 have elected
"must carry". Channels 4, 5, 11 and 29 have elected
"retransmission consent". It appears right now that
Nortel will have an agreement shortly with Channel 5.
They have made a deal where there is no compensations.
provided. Channel 11 has been willing to work with
Nortel in finding non-cash alternatives to carry. They
have been willing to work and negotiate. Channel 4 has
been letting the CBS corporate negotiate with the Nortel
corporate office and are quite adamant about receiving
cash. He will provide updates.
V. OTHER BUSINESS:
a. Recognition of Service
Mr. Moravetz stated Mr. Duane Peterson resigned from the
Commission effective in June 1993. The City Council will
recognize his service with a letter and certificate. He
will notify members of the date of City Council meeting
so they can attend.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Mr. Weaver, seconded by Mr. Scott, to adjourn the
meeting.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON STOUFFER DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE JULY 28, 1993, CATV ADVIS012Y COMMISSION
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:52 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
i .� ,
La�onn Cooper (��
Recording Secretary
10S
(a) A cable franchise authority may enforce the customer service standards set forth in section (c) of
this rule against cable operators. The franchise authority must provide affected cable operators ninety
(90) days written notice of its intent to enfo�ce the standards.
(b) Nothing in this rule should be construed to prevent or prohibit:
(1) A franchising authority and a cable operato� from agreeing to customer service requi�ements
that exceed the standards set fo�th in section (c) of this rule;
(2) A franchising authority from enforcing, through the end of the franchise term, pre-existing
customer service requirements that exceed the standards set forth in section (c) of this rule and
are contained in current franchise agreements;
(3) Any State or any franchising authority from enacting or enfo�cing any consume� protection law,
to the extent not specifica!!y preempted herein; or
(4) The establishment or enforcement of any State or municipal law or �egulation concerning
customer service that imposes custome� service requirements that exceed, or add�ess matters
not addressed by, the standards set forth in section (c) of this rule.
{c) Effective July 1, 1993, a cable operator shall be subject to the following customer service standards:
(1) Cable svstem office hours and telephone availability.
(i} The cable operator will maintain a local, toll-free or collect call telephone access line which
will be available to its subscribers 24 hours a day, seven days a week_
(A) Trained company represe�tatives will be available to respond to custamer telephone
inquiries during normal business hours.
{B) After normal business hours, the access line may be answered by a service or an
automated response system, including an answering machine. Inqui�ies received after
normal business hours must be responded to by a trained company representative on
the next business day.
(ii) Under normal operating conditions, telephone answer time by a customer representative,
including wait time, shall not exceed thirty (30) seconds when the connection is made. !f
the call needs to be transferred, transfe� time shall �ot exceed thirty (30) seconds. These
standards shall be met no less than ninety (90) percent of the time unde� normal operating
conditions, measured on a quarterly basis.
(iii) The operator will not be required to acquire equipment or perform surveys to measure
compliance with the telephone answering standards above unless an historical record of
complaints indicates a clear failure to comply.
(iv} Under normat operating conditions, the customer will receive a busy signal less than three
(3) percent of the time.
(v) Customer service center and bill payment locations will be open at (east during normal
business hours and will be conveniently located.
(2) lnstallations, outages and service calls. Under normal operating conditions, each of the
following four standards will be met no less than ninety five (95) percent of the time measured
on a quarterly basis:
(i) Standard installations will be performed within seven (7) business days after an order has
been placed. "Standard" installations are those that are located up to 125 feet from the
existing distribution system.
10T
� _
(ii} Excluding conditions beyond the control of the operator, the cable operator will begin
working on "seroice interruptions" promptly and in no event later than 24 hours after the.
interruption becomes known. The cable operator must begin actions to correct other
service problems the next business day after notification of the service problem. .
(iii} The "appointment window" alternatives for installations, service calfs, and other installafion
activities will be either a specific time or, at maximum, a four-hour time block during no�mal
business hours. (fhe operator may schedule service calls and other installation activities
outside of normal business hours for the express convenience of the customer.}
{iv) An operator may not cancel an appointment with a customer after the close of business on
the business day prior to the scheduled appointment.
(v) If a cable operator representative is running late for an appointment with a customer and will
not be able to keep the appointment as scheduled, the custome� will be contacted. The
appointment will be rescheduled, as necessary, at a time which is convenient for the
customer.
(3) Communications between cable operators and cable subscribers.
(i) Notificatrons to subscribers.
(A) The cable operator shall provide written information on each of the following areas at
the time of installation of service, at least annually to all subscribers, and at any time
upon request:
(1) Products and services offered;
(2} Prices and options fo� programming services and conditions of subscription to
programming and other services;
(3) Instaltation and service maintenance po(icies;
(4) Instructions on how to use the cable service;
(5) Channel positions of programming ca�ried on the system; and,
(6) Billing and complaint procedures, including the address and telephone number of
the Iocal franchise authorit�ls cable office.
(B} Customers will be notified of any changes in rates, programming services or channel
positions as soon as possible through announcements on the cable system and in
writing. Notice must be given to subscribers a minimum of thirty (30) days in advance
of such changes if the change is within the control of the cable operator. ln addition,
the cable operator shall notify subscribers thirty (30) days in advance of any significant
changes in the other intormation required by the preceding paragraph.
(ii} Billing.
(A) Bills will be clear, concise and understandable. Bills must be fully itemized, with
itemizations including, but not limited to, basic and premium service charges and
equipment charges. Bills will also clearly delineate all activity during the billing period,
including optional charges, rebates and credits.
(B) In case of a billing dispute, the cable operator must respond to a written complaint from
a subscriber within thirty {30) days.
(iii) Refunds. Refund cl�ecks will be issued promptly, but no later than either-
(A) The customer s next billing cycle following resolution of the request or thirty (30) days,
whichever is earlier, or
(B} The return of the equipment supplied by the cable operator if service is terminated.
10U
(iv) Credits. Credits for service will be issued no later than the customer's next billing cycle
following the determination that a credit is warranted.
{4) Definitions.
(i) Narmal Business Hours. The term "normal business hours" means those hours during
which most similar businesses in the community are open to serve customers. In a(I cases,
"normal business hours" must include some evening hours at least one night pe� week
and/or some weekend hours.
(iij Normal Operating Conditions. The term "normal operating conditions" means those service
conditions which are within the control of the cable operator. Those conditions which are
nor within the contro� of the cable operator include, but are not limited to, natural disasters,
civi! disturbances, power outages, teJe�hone network outages, and severe or unusua!
weather conditions. Those conditions which are ordinarily within the controt of the cable
operator include, but are not limited to, special promotions, pay-per-view events rate
increases, regular peak or seasonal demand periods, and maintenance or upg�ade of the
cahle system.
{iii} Service lnierruption. The term "service inter�uption" means the loss of picture o� sound on
one or more cable channels.
g76.309 Reference
l�V
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING, AIIGIIST il, 1993
_________________________________________________________________
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Newman called the August 11, 1993, Planning
Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present: Dave Newman, Dave Kondrick, Dean Saba,
Brad Sielaff, Connie Modig
Members Absent: Diane Savage, LeRoy Oquist
Others Present: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Oliver Tam, 1150 Fireside Drive N.E.
Joyce Moen, 1128 - 63rd Avenue N.E.
Joyce Trebisovsky, 1130 Fireside Drive N.E.
APPROVAL OF JULY 28. 1993, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the July
28, 1993, Planning Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT. P.S.
#93-03, BY OLIVER TAM� TAM ADDITION: To replat property
described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing
at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast
corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if
extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a
point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of
the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of
beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing
westerly along said last described line a distance of 288
feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence
easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence
southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the
point of beginning. This property is generally located at
1160 Fireside Drive N.E.
11
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 11 1993 PAGE 2
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CFIAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is processing three land use
requests. One is a plat request to subdivide the subject parcel
which is addressed as 1160 Fireside Drive, located between the
two mobile home parks east of Highway 65 into three lots. The
second request is to rezone a portion of the subject parcel from
C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3, General Multiple
Dwelling District. The third request is a variance request to
address the existing encroachments by the restaurant faciZity
currently located on the property. On August 17, 1993, the
Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance request
to the City Council.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is proposing to replat the
existing parcel into three separate parcels. Two parcels are
proposed to be used for two new four-unit residential dwellings,
and the third parcei is for the existing restaurant facility.
There are currently two dwelling units on the lots proposed for
the two new four-unit dwellings.
Ms. McPherson stated the lots for the multiple family dwellings
meet the minimum lot area and lot width requirements as required
by the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District. Each lat meets
the minimum 15,000 square foot area requirement and also meets
the minimum lot width of 85 feet. Each parcel has a minimum of
25 feet of access from a public street. The second lot achieves
its access via a"flag lot". While typically a flag lot is not
an ideal subdivision pattern, there is adequate room on the
remainder of the parcel for a cul-de-sac should the parcel change
use at a later date, and additional right-of-way could be
dedicated to the east of the easterly lot line and a public
street could be constructed for a future subdivision.
Ms. McPherson stated the remaining portion of the subject parcel
is for the existing restaurant facility. The lot area exceeds
the minimum of 35,000 square feet as required for the C-3,
General Shopping Center District. There is not a minimum lot
width requirement in the C-3 district, however, there is adequate
room on site for the parcel to meet the minimum setback and
parking requirements, with the exception of the two existing
encroachments on the southwest corner of the property for the
restaurant facility.
Ms. McPherson stated a portion of the restaurant's parking lot
and access does encroach onto the multiple family lot as
proposed. Cross parking and access easements will need to be
recorded against both the proposed restaurant property as well as
the proposed multiple dwelling property.
11A
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AIIGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 3
Ms. McPherson stated that as part o� the overall plat request,
the petitioner is proposing to improve the parking lot and
provide the required B618 concrete curb and gutter as required by
City Code. A landscaping plan should be submitted by the
petitioner to provide adequate screening and buffering between
the restaurant facility and the proposed multi-unit buildings. A
detention facility will also be required as part of the parking
lot upgrade. The Engineering Department will require the
petitioner to sign and record against the property a storm water
pond maintenance agreement. The Engineering Department has
reviewed the preliminary grading plan and has submitted a list of
comments via the surveyor to the petitioner.
Ms. McPherson stated that as the plat request meets the minimum
requirements of each of the zoning districts, staff recommends
that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to
the City Council with the following stipulations:
l. The petitioner shall submit the information requested
in Scott Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993,
regarding the stormwater pond and the grading and
drainage plan.
2. The petitioner shall record against proposed Lots 2 and
3, Block l, Tam Addition, cross parking and access
easements.
3.
4.
The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan.
The petitioner shall execute and record against the
property a stormwater pond maintenance agreement.
5. The park dedication shall be $1,500 per lot for the
residential portion and $.023 per square foot for the
remaining portion for the restaurant facility. (shall
be paid at the time of the issuing of the building
permit - for residential)
Mr. Newman stated that access to the flag lot would really be
through the parking lot and that the residential property would
have to negotiate parking spaces with the restaurant property.
Has the City ever done anything like this before?
Ms. McPherson stated that typically most of the cross parking
easements have occurred between two commercial properties or two
industrial properties. In reviewing this request, the City
Assessor suggested that perhaps the flag could be rotated so that
the flag portion is on the westerly side, and the access would
then occur over the driveway for the other multiple family
dwelling. Then, the back yard of the second multiple family
dwelling would be facing the restaurant facility. However, that
eliminates the potential for any future subdivision and public
roadway.
11B
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AUGDST 11, 1993 PAGE 4
Mr. Kondrick stated that when the restaurant is having a
successful evening, the possibility exists that there will be
times when there are no parking spaces for the multiple family
dwellings.
Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is proposing a four stall garage.
If that is a concern, the owner can post a sign reserving the
first four stalls for additional parking. That has been done for
commercial developments.
Mr. Newman stated that if, in fact, the multiple family property
is under separate ownership from the restaurant property, then
how is the City going to get the additional 25 feet to put in the
public roadway.
Ms. Dacy stated that in answer to that concern, as part of the
plat request, they should reserve a 25 foot street easement along
the entire length of the flag to reserve that option. Maybe the
following two stipulations should be added in the event the
restaurant property should ever return to residential:
�
7.
If the restaurant property returns to
use, the parking lot encroachment is
two properties.
The dedication of the street easement
a residential
removed from these
Mr. Oliver Tam stated he is the owner of the Rice Bowl
Restaurant. He stated he is very appreciative of staff's ideas
and suggestions to make the lot work for everyone involved.
Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner agreed with the stipulations
recommended by staff.
Mr. Tam stated he had no problems with the stipulations.
Mr. Newman asked if the petitioner understood that the City may
require a 25 foot street easement.
Mr. Tam stated he had no objection to that, whatever works best
for the property.
Ms. Joyce Trebisovsky, 1130 Fireside Drive N.E., stated she
represents Park Plaza Mobile Home Park and Estate Mobile Home
Park. Her only concern is that if the parking lot is expanded to
the right side of the property, there should be some type of
barrier so the lights do not shine into the mobile home park.
Mr. Newman stated that, at this time, there is no proposal to
move the parking lot. If in the future, the owner decides to
replat the restaurant property and break it into residential
1ots, then at that time a public street would go in. However, in
all likelihood the parking lot would also go away. If any of
11C
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AOGIIST 11, 1993 _ PAGB 5
this happens, there would be another public hearing, notices
would be sent out, and this process would repeat itself.
Ms. Trebisovsky thanked Mr. Newman for this clarification.
Mr. Saba stated he did not think it is a good situation to have a
cross parking easement between commercial and residential.
Ms. McPherson stated the proposed multi-family units are not
intended to be the typical general occupancy units. They are for
Mr. Tam's family and employees of the Rice Bowl, and he will be
the owner of both the properties.
Ms. Modig stated that is fine for the present tim�; but if, in
the future, Mr. Ta� sells the property, then there is a parking
lot situation with a cross parking easement and two pieces of
property under separate ownership.
Ms. Dacy stated there have been instances on commercial
properties where signs reserving parking spaces are successful.
The Code requires eight parking spaces for each multi-family
dwelling unit, and they already have four garage spaces. That
leaves only four spaces that are needed, and she believed those
spaces can be reserved. She did not see a big conflict with the
cross parking easement.
Ms. Modig stated the only times she could see the parking being a
problem is during private parties or large events at the
restaurant.
Ms. Dacy stated that if the Commission feels strongly about this,
then one solution would be to flipflop the flag to the west side
of the property.
Mr. Saba stated he could not see a problem with a cross parking
easement with commercial/commercial properties, but he did see
potential problems with commercial/residential.
Ms. Modig stated she did not see a problem now with the proposed
usage of the multiple family units by Mr. Tam's family members.
Her concern is for the future. If the property is sold and the
new owners do not want the cross parking easement, does the City
have to get involved?
Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending that the cross parking
easement be executed as part of the plat approval. If there are
any changes, then both owners would have to agree to that.
Ms. Dacy stated that in looking at the plat, there might be
enough area on site to create a little pad for four parking
spaces on each lot separate from the commercial property. Staff
could work with the petitioner on this.
11D
PLANNING COMMI38ION MEETING. AOGOST 11, 1993 PAGE 6
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPBRSON NBWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M.
Mr. Newman stated staff has done the best they can with some
undesirable choices. He did not particularly like the cross
parking easement, but he did think that keeping the flag on the
east side of the property preserves some options for the future.
There might be some problems with the cross parking easement in
the future, but those are the types of issues that are better
left resolved by the property owners. In the cases of
redevelopment, there are going to be some problems in working
around existing structures. He stated he is comfortable with
approving the plat with the stipulations as recommended by staff,
with the addition of a stipulation to vacate the street easement
and to terminate the cross parking easement upon change in use of
restaurant or discontinuation of use of the lot.
Mr. Saba stated he is not comfortable with the cross parking
easement. It is a good situation now, but what about the future?
What if the restaurant changes to a night club, and there are
even more cars in the parking lot? He would like to see
something else worked out with the parking.
Ms. Modig stated that she did not have a problem with the flag
lot. She would like to figure out something to do with the cross
parking easement if it becomes a problem in the future without
having to go through this whole process again.
Ms. Dacy asked if the Commission members would like staff to
explore the possibility of finding a separate area for eight
spaces other than on the commercial lot.
Ms. Modig stated she is just concerned about the cross parking
becoming an issue in the future, and it may never be an issue.
Mr. Sielaff stated that if it is possible, he would like to see
the parking kept on the residential lots to prevent any future
parking problems.
Mr. Kondrick stated he would also be in favor of the present
configuration with access into the lots with eight parking spaces
on the residential lots.
Mr. Newman stated he had no problem with that, except that would
mean blacktopping more area of the overall site to put in eight
more stalls.
Ms. Modig stated she would be comfortable with trying to put
eight parking spaces on the residential lots.
11E
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 11, 1993 PAGE 7
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend
approval of preliminary plat, P.S. #93-03, by Oliver Tam, Tam
Addition, to replat property described as that part of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12,
Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as
follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the
northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which,
if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point
distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a
distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the
land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last
described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a
distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance
of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396
feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally
located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., with the following
stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall submit the information requested
in Scott Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993,
r�garding the stormwater pond and the grading and
drainage plan.
2. The petitioner shall record against proposed Lots 2 and
3, Block 1, Tam Addition, cross parking and access
easements.
3.
4.
The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan.
The petitioner shall execute and record against the
property a stormwater pond maintenance agreement.
5. The park dedication shall be $1,500 per lot for the
residential portion and $.023 per square foot for the
remaining portion for the restaurant facility. Payment
of the park dedication fee for the residential
properties shall be paid at the time of the issuance of
the building permit.
�
7.
Mr. Newman
motion, he
parking.
situation.
A 25 foot street easement shall be dedicated on the
easterly portion of the flag lot for a future road.
Staff shall work with the petitioner to provide eight
parking spaces within both residential lots.
stated that although he would vote in favor of the
did not think they need to require this additional
However, it is a good approach to a difficult
11F
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AIIGUST 11, 1993 PAGE 8
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DBCLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING, ZOA #93-01, BY
OLIVER TAM: To rezone property from C-3, General Shopping
Center to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling on property
described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing
at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast
corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if
extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a
point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of
the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of
beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing
westerly along said last described line a distance of 288
feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence
easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence
southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the
point of beginning. This property is generally located at
1160 Fireside Drive N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE DOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:15 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated that currently, the two dwelling units are
located on the same parcel as the restaurant. These dwelling
units are currently nonconforming as residential uses are not
permitted in the C-3, General Shopping Center District. In order
to allow the petitioner to even upgrade the existing dwellings or
construct new ones as he is proposing, the property needs to be
rezoned from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3,
General Multiple Dwelling.
Ms. McPherson stated the rezoning request only pertains to the
proposed lots for the multiple family dwelling units. The
remaining parcel will remain C-3, General Shopping Center
District.
Ms. McPherson stated three criteria need to be evaluated in
analyzing any rezoning request:
1.
2.
District compatibility with adjacent uses and zoning
District intent
11G
PLANNINa COMMISSION MEETING. AIIGIIST 11, 1993 PAG$ 9
3. Whether or not the parcel meets the district
requirements
Ms. McPherson stated that as discussed earZier during the plat
request, the proposed Zots under the subdivision ordinance meet
the minimum requirements of the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling
District. Also, the proposed use of the two lots for multiple
family dwelling units is also consistent with the purpose of the
R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District, which is to provide
zoning for multiple family, two family, and single family
dwellings.
Ms. McPherson stated the adjacent properties are zoned R-4,
Mobile Home Park, so rezoning the two properties to R-3 would not
have an adverse impact on the R-4 residential zoning.
Ms. McPherson stated that as the request meets the criteria for
evaluation of a rezoning request, staff recommends the Planning
Commission recommend approval of the rezoning request with one
stipulation:
1. Preliminary plat request, P.S. #93-03, shall be
approved.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend to
City Council approval of rezoning, ZOA #93-01, by Oliver Tam, to
rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center to R-3, General
Multiple Dwelling on property described as that part of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12,
Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as
follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the
northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which,
if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point
distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a
distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the
land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last
described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a
distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance
of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396
feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally
located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., with the following
stipulation:
11H
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 10
1. Preliminary plat request, P.S. #93-03, shall be
approved.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY.
Ms. McPherson stated the City Council will conduct a public
hearing for the preliminary plat and rezoning requests on
September 27, 1993.
3. SAV #93-03, BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: To vacate all easements
as donated and dedicated to the public for drainage and
utility purposes and as shown on the recorded plat of
Shorewood Plaza, as corrected by Surveyor's Certificate
files as Document No. 176792. All in Anoka County,
Minnesota.
This property is generally located at the intersection of
Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Highway 65 and
Central Avenue.
The subject parcels include the East and West Moore Lake
Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet Swim and Health
Club, and Sears Outlet.
Ms. McPherson stated the Planning Commission recently reviewed a
plat request by the City of Fridley to replat the Shorewood Plaza
plat which was approved by the City in 1987. New easements for
utility, drainage, and bikeway/walkway purposes are to be
dedicated on the new revised plat. In order to avoid any
confusion, staff is suggesting that the existing easements which
are not being utilized by the utilities or various bikeway/
walkways be vacated prior to recording the plat with its
associated easements. A number of utilities constructed within
this development we�e not located within the easements as they
were dedicated. The City is ensuring that appropriate easements
are being dedicated over those utilities to provide proper access
for the City.
Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning
Commission recommend approval of this vacation request. Staff
will ensure that the vacation ordinance is recorded prior to the
recording of the new plat.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend to City
Council approval of SAV #93-03, by the City of Fridley to vacate
all easements as donated and dedicated to the public for drainage
and utility purposes and as shown on the recorded plat of
Shorewood Plaza, as corrected by Surveyor's Certificate files as
Document No. 176792. All in Anoka County, Minnesota.
This property is generally located at the intersection of
Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Highway 65 and
Central Avenue. ,
1 1�
I
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGUST 11, 1993 PAGE il
The subject parcels include the East and West Moore Lake
Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet Swim and Health
Club, and Sears Outlet.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY.
4. RECEIVE JULY 8, 1993, HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the July
8, 1993, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. RECEIVE JULY 27, 1993, APPEALS COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to receive the
July 27, 1993, Appeals Commission minutes.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr.
meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting
declared the motion carried unanimously
Planning Commission meeting adjourned at
Respectfully submitted,
Ly Saba
Recording Secretary
11J
Saba, to adjourn the
aye, Chairperson Newman
and the August 11, 1993,
8:30 p.m.
r �
�
�
Community Development Department
P G D�sioN
City of Fridley
DATE: September 9, 1993 /J�, •
/�'+_
TO: William Burns, City Manager�,
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Establish Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat
Request, P.S. #93-03, by Oliver Tam; 1160
Fireside Drive N.E.
The PZanning Commission reviewed the plat request at its August 11,
1993 meeting. Chapter 211 of the Fridley City Code requires the
City Council to conduct a public hearing for all plat requests.
Staff recommends that the City Council establish September 27, 1993
as the date of the public hearing.
MM/ dn
M-93-497
REQUEST
Aermit Number
Applicant
Proposed
Request
Location
SITE DATA
Size
Density
Present Zoning
Present Land Use(s)
Adjacent
, Zoning
Adjacent Land Use(s)
Utilities
Park Dedication
Watershed District
ANALYSIS
Financial Implications
Conformance to the
Comprehensive Plan
Compatibility with Adjacent
Zoning and Uses
Environmental
Considerations
RECOMMENDATION
Staff
Appeals Commission
Ptanning Commission
Author �:ls
S TAFF REP O RT
Community Development Department
Appeals Commission Date
Planning Commission Date August 11, 1993
City Council Date: September 13, 1993
P.S. #93-03
Oliver Tam
Z+o replat prc�xty into three lots
1160 Fir�eide Drive
114,048 sq. ft.; 2.61 acres
C-3, General Shopping Center District
Retai 1/R�s idential
1�4, Mobile Hoire Park, to E& W; C-3, Gex�eral Shopping Center
District, to S& N; M-1, Light Industrial, to the S
Residential to the E& W; Vacant to the S; Retail to the N
$1,500 per lot (2); $.023 per sq. ft.
Rice Creek
Appivval with stipulations
Approval with stipulations
's�
; �. c .�o. �
/a:
�«
�
�
P . S . 4�93-03
Oliver Tam
N' //2 SEC. /2, T. 30, R. 2�
n
C/TY
OF FR/OL E Y
2
� , �2
1'
Na �
11M LOCATION MAP
P.S. 4�93-03
nliver Tam
11 N ZONING MAP
Staff Report
P.S. #93-03,
Page 2
Request
1160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam
The petitioner requests that a plat be approved to split a parcel
into three lots. The request is for 1160 Fireside Drive N.E.
In addition to the plat request, the petitioner is also processing
a rezoning request to rezone two of the proposed three lots from
C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3, General Multiple
Family Dwelling, to allow the construction of two 4-unit dwellings.
The petitioner is also processing a variance request to bring
existing encroachments of the restaurant facility into conformance.
Site
Located on the subject parcel is the Tam's Fireside Rice Bowl
Restaurant and two existing dwelling units. The property is zoned
C-3, General Shopping Center District, as are the properties to the
north and south. The properties to the east and west are zoned R-
4, Mobile Home Park.
Analvsis
The petitioner is proposing to create three parcels, two proposed
to be rezoned to multiple family and one commercial property.
Multiple Family
Two multiple family lots are proposed. Each lot meets the minimum
lot area requirement of 15,000 square feet for the R-3, Multiple
Family Dwelling district, for a 4-unit building. The minimum lot
width of 85 feet is met. The proposed setbacks for the multi-unit
buildings conform to the zoning district requirements. Each parcel
has a minimum of 25 feet of street access. The southerly lot is
a"flag" lot in order to provide access to Fireside Drive. While
direct access to a public street is preferable, there is adequate
room for an additional 25 feet to the east to be dedicated and a
cul-de-sac constructed for future residential subdivision to occur.
Commercial
The remaining portion of the property will be used for the
restaurant facility. The lot area exceeds the minimum 35,000
square feet required by the C-3, General Shopping Center District.
There is no minimum lot width required by the C-3 district;
however, there is adequate room for the restaurant facility. The
access will be provided from Fireside Drive. A portion of the
access does encroach onto the new lot for the proposed multi-unit
building. Cross parking and access easements will need to be
recorded against the restaurant and the multi-famiZy parcel.
110
Staff Report
P.S. #93-03, I160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam
Page 3
The restaurant meets the minimum setback requirements with the
exception of the rear yard setback and the setback from an adjacent
residential district. The Appeals Commission reviewed the variance
request to reduce the rear yard setback from 40 feet to 26.8 feet
and to reduce the setback from an adjacent residential district
from 50 feet to 20.4 feet. The Commission recommended that the
City Council approve the variances to correct the existing
encroachments.
As part of the plat request, the petitioner proposes to improve the
parking lot and provide required B618 concrete curb and gutter.
A landscaping plan should also be submitted by the petitioner to
provide adequate screening and buffering between the restaurant
facility and the proposed multi-unit buildings. With the parking
lot improvement, a detention facility will be required, and the
petitioner will be required to sign a stormwater pond maintenance
agreement for maintenance of the detention pond. The engineering
department has received the preliminary grading and drainage plan
and has provided comments.
Recommendation
As the proposed plat request meets the minimum requirements of each
zoning district, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the request to the City Council with the
following stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall submit the information requested in Scott
Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993, regarding the
stormwater pond and the grading and drainage plan.
2. The petitioner shall record against Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Tam
Addition, cross parking and access easements.
3. The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan.
4. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property
a stormwater pond maintenance agreement.
Planning Commission Action
The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval of the
request to the City Council. The Commission added the following
stipulations:
5. Park dedication fees shall be paid by the petitioner.
6. Each dwelling unit shall have adequate parking separate from
the restaurant.
11P
Staff Report
P.S. #93-03, 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam
Page 4
City Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action. As the petitioner has not made a final decision
regarding the final design of the dwelling units, staff recommends
that stipulation #6 be amended to read:
6. The petitioner shall submit final dwelling plans indicating
compliance with the parking requirements of the R-3, Genera�
Multiple Family Dwelling district.
71Q
�
� � FIMaR{
J TOP MU o H,•. .93-03
p E�EV.'t�4��r_�
'- �v J����iF ::- /�� ^ 600 feel Eae� oflhe tVest Ji�e
3�-r�-�°'�� J� FireN4dran! � Of Ihe $.E.%¢ orlhe NtV. % OF SeC.l2
fa�� Save� = a O_-,�� ; ___ w J/D� � �
As'anhc/e W �' ! � or .,y r�cvE ��/ /c�,.. /
, N q
J� S 88 4.0'42"E. w �+- /
-- ' -- 288.00--- aesea / ---
'------ — '-- __ees,ao
c�"° �r?oad ��menr erpoc. No. 285700 �, j,--
'—� Fc;aeco --.--. i o
,�sr � o ,A
$Tp NI N TC;6945 T'CS95 CVas ' V E 1(1 i
� RM � j yE. > M i n n w D O li s a S• Cwnpsn ---- � c u a e
°� O.S � a e nf Pe� N �_ !95 aOTC
� 'y �Rer s. eo' x•e ourcer� � • � --- ---+o�.n-- � — -
r o ENT�OIy ,4R� 1niV.:e� 5 � s.as'40'4 '�.o.�
` u�tRns�.a � CATCH BASIN
! � 9 896 ��,n I�sicr+ I
{ x p TC =B96.0
� e�c,� egq T FL �895.5
� „ 8�6"3 � J LF-f�'RCPC �$ GRATE-895.3
` , �o � / F. 2 � 4� a TORMSEN/FJ? 0.5 • INV.=89J.5
'� �,a. . eec t
V ry; "� � y� / z c43Z � o, � 6»2
til W ��W a `n �= -'« °� �j L- � ' ;,j � �
_ �' 1 � 'S� p� �jti iyWC�.aN°'y c�e ^ r�- ( � -
W
� , O; ro O11y � �`J! ,"o�ap h a x
� ? { � . O - � � i�` � 0 N M .'n 1 � I 4
. U 4 `���� �� ..y I
�n � 401? �_ ;zc�',=
� J QJ; c, � I
� O�, � / G a 5 e�
' �r6 Z � O� ��oja9c�t 894�0 Q�' � ��9 54 897 Oc
�k o; '�. , :. � / � m u V � `7� � v � lV A
O b , '1 '\ @x
o i� {� � .%E i4.c � � k`�' ' � 1 �� � y � I ..
Q a
�„ ,m� .: Fti<.�:�:`-' ,,a, Q � , .
4 4 i� •.� • GaYaGE e� O� i
,� � � •�c'l y�' . �'� �� " -°/ � � � � N � ` F I
� '/�—.. -- --- ` " ,} Q� Np � n
[a Q N m a
f I �' S.88 GO'G2�• °" : o CS QH' : 2 � O � I
� I
i � , ��` esa„a o �Q �O v> �
' - — ---- =�° 6 M � � O in � �.
jf o c 1 � ':c.b o. '1� /N I� (�l O W L-` �
I' L�Q <�r' I ,�` ia.� � � �� i5 8 1�t74 "� 6!7 34 ^ B�GE ,
?o �' d - ! ot � �''- �)
W a i�m ��cRyFR/'N= ,y 'J iJv / J y V N
p ! II+ G Io J � F J O Q� I
� C � ; ,� , ! ,� ,� � . h
I �,E,tOI C'v t � J',' � � ' �? � l� V �Y �
a,: �;a' R _ / �; (m m�/ 4\� � 1/. 7�� �G! a � I o-
. _... .�POy. P / ���� )\/,� � a O m I i p�
Z I � � tl 5 !�� �.:/�(`y'� o� `. ��\ , / / 'i� j � �ltJ o0 �0� .
I m = n�/ J� �
,' ' W �25 � z a� J � �'X � � . ��;?W� (.� �Cd�¢ : /y o\V � N O � I 1�1 M N
� `l I / � p %�e � � �t ` /Q C N ��U 3 I ,W W
� 1 ��, _� P � ° o; � �g ,
. �� I as�,6 , a ta Q,�' �- �N
' � L — -- � � � 697 p.0 N }
. w D�� 896a9 � ^ � / � % � 896.`.
V IO
. �p Z W � . (�Q'
. �L J = __ '� °j^ �
. p Y W \ — °1— - 69 � \ � �96
W � o � „ , ^ `� �6�, .
yq �D }a � CONCRETmE� 8618 ^, �F� I 3�
� j� I�� �` ��` � \
w� y�� vi '- ¢'
' I�c, =E.� � �_ SCAI.E
5
' � cYi I°d � _� N � - 5'. a9 I TOTAL
Y¢ � �4 L, t 62 �t. 89� 6 '
Q ys 9 a \/�{-� p, _ � I PROPOSE
Q� �\/�/ /) � 5
, N I 7 " 69 / � J 'I
- 895 " ��� �9�+" I� �`3B9g�*�c;, �
�' S ��'�
Wx�' I r��'Y 6d.` ri x I<� la! . g94 I
�:`. . i b p�q eU/� S�-U � / � � U 89b.7
F k ,� a � S S O/NG Cc� Y �,� �� � --
s Q,
` I ��a ° � . ' ' � OR/VF. ' ,� Y 9ECT/OH CURB —_
a� 6,� o a9� � 893
r �
�' � OQsq°+.� 892 3� ,� ' 60.o v 894 �—' I � BEINO 1�
r � m � �R/Vtc ' � / 833 --� 4 R£AR L
, , I � BF ,0 892 I
� e�'� e�°-sev o ------ .�+•9 � ,�a
� m .'t�i AS�S �� e�r.; � Bg� 0
' W � ' B 6ITUM/NOUS "'"-'"��^
� — — — — . 6s° 6 \eft ! / � �
� � _ OP ~-6!t 2 ��wEFf DR%VE 90 �g E91.1 , 1.3 -
`= p�� RH£.�D R7wER 8B9 --�g,i� 89i ° �a�
W ��' B93e
G � ��- � y- --- 288.00a{: o eB9� Ut�lir taaemenf Perpoc.
4 � �4 N.88°4042'1Yx Nc'S 3979Q; 490514 baa,o ---'
m
W W A/ine which, ii exfended, wou/d infcrsecf the Wes? line of the S.E. %4
� v� of fhe N. K: %4 of Sec. 12, af a pornr disfanF 726 fcef Soufher/y of the �
Q2 Northwrs.' corner of'tne S�'/4o{�he ni.w.% sa�d Sec.;2
` � ° 11 R `�
� W J
U >
� � \�
� � NM ��93-Q3
`� TOP NUT NYO,
O ELEV.�B��er Tam -
N, 6�CiP yyaJermaiti ��� �-POrnl 600 /eet Ea�f of'!he Wesy line
:;�niisry 5«,�,r 2 b��s/D� D Fi�eHyd�a.it � o1'1he S.E./q o/'fhe KW. ` oF 9ec.12
ass
Manho% q u 4 �� W � 4� E �/ � /
_ � � a S 88°40 42"E. q, �
„ -- 288_00— us a / ---
� a — '_' -� '-6esdo
�,,�_ �� c�ae c� ax o�Ro�d cr�••ra menr Ooc. Na. 2B57o0 �,—_ ---- l� c
ST �
�Cf' STp,Q N N T�bXS 7C s tues I V E . u�f°. �9
-'�= C8 '��. >Minnt�pcl.s orn an ' Guae
. � O.S � �a e�+2nt A[r0oe 6 ` ' -�� U5 �OTC
- STAP�y e�z --nLt9- - s.�o-= _ — _
ETE s. ed z•E
ovrtET� . . " ---�oLf1--
N��N uv��e 5 s.es�4o'a 'e. ;
� AR� °''t S'"'a � a� CA7CH BASIN
� 696 ,� • '��� . (
���� 8� q TC -896.0
e�c�s T 3 FL �895_S
Q� o � 4 L F-12"'RCP C ig CRqTE = 895.3
J Q � =� ��., 2 � s TORMSEWER 0_5 . INY.c89L5
ssc t
V �'!tiY y W / U' / .,� e^• . o
� N � 2 a�✓r «� j`��r� _� �A �an:
- � •���`� 0� 02� a= � oNay . J 4 I .
W �•5 o pJW - v ,� v°/ .a� � ti W
Z i�� d V�m�m � mQ� y� I
o- ° i� °r + ';'� �
v , � _ � ce. 1:� � �_ �m ; Z � = I
� J - QJ% o ��
°� 2 � Crpcim a,c.o G." ss e�T I
o �o�oJasc.a Q a9 � e� sa e�� oc
�W , r amvv /� ,�`}�'� �% �41
0 Z � '� • iS 24.0 ky + � 1 �� � y � �
4 m . �.� ., � � � ,. , I �
� ,•• E. . cnznce e � � Q J, o' m � � �
a � :���° ,;�. ��� �` I . o � " F
� � �-� �"N � I
� �i . ' — _ _ — __ � �u• �1 I
,�",-i - � a/ � m �
r�.. 5.8840't2"E. oi ��o� a� QN � 2 O �l1 �
,,� � r e�c„a 140.0o I Q e . y b
�� Q .._ — ___ E�e 6 N � p �q � � I
O -o a I `'1 0 . +l-. N J W-
I. � . = 4,� ' � �
, ?o i � � � �a:o + �2 5 a �,h y se� sa e�c.e
Q 1�'m ,WE _ � �
41 p�4� 1 oar �` ° "l� g ��+ h V N � .
o t ING k Q J 7�+ Q 2
°–°!� anJ L5 � la �° Y> ci k y � 3
o+!p� o yaR�R � m� � t Q �
' �� ��pXOw�� 1 � � � % : /� � .W � � I� , ��5� 0 41 I : O m
:b ���V� � F � �
r � 2 0:� I o� Q�
Z I �W < 2� y. . ooJr J/ �O 6 i_w �• � m N MW !f � M�
� �'XO J �C ,<yrv'V � • � gU • K! � r/1
g I �4 Q �l' w 3 t �` N R4 i� �'W•"i
L � � o. � �g
� : � 897tt .�� Z
�. _ �� 2�m ` � �
3�'` • � — / a» u ti �
.896a9 ' ^ i ` �' � ' B�G.�
W a °j I S.is4oei x f
� z �, �^ � o., p: 1
WJ � 1 �j
� o — — \� �- 8g'7� \ $96
I� y� � ED B 618 � ,�.^�., � �6 � �
`n � �. � • . CONCRETE' (!.
� / I 30
4l � ICV �a =:' � P
. OQ W� y �.• �� � �
ti
� ~
W ��c, 3E.o � � . SCALE
�W Y � c uWi .,: = = g95
ci � �q I "' � ^ � , TOTAL
z �Z �E 89�6
�� 969 ° � T 5 w I PROPOSE
� N I �
� 7 d9 x �
89$ n Cu,pe .w
6 93P V I
W � / ST�?y " s� E9 n / � Y X� � g94
2 4 0.4- g<//� STU / B9S.7
4 �98 �$ 5 O'NG CCO �� I --
� ��a e � �
OR/VE
e � Y 9ECT10N CU
� o� ybti _ _ o ey� RB 893 —
2C.�,y 6o a 894 u
Z ,(oQ g9 492 3a,> _ ° ! ci 9ElNQ /i
� m �,Q�Ye 693 - W RCAR L
J I � BF .o � 8 9 Z �`
~ a�� e�°-sev � ��-9 ti �
m M AS!S y� e�e..g e9�
0°'
j B _ __ SlTUM/NOUS .
0 ~-E» 2 ��wEa DR%VE — n�—°•'�_ \e+� e / � r .
pp !o
W � �° _ o O RHEAO PoWER 89 889 �-�1"��� 91 °- Clt.t !.3_""
�awcc
� o "--- Y ee�c --- 288.00-: aee.� _
° pv 6+x� Utilify Easemen! Perpoc. ----
� q N.88°40aZ�Y�I. Na s 3979d1 f 4907C eea,o
rp
W W A/ine which, iF ezfended, wou/d inJcrsecf the W�; /ine of the S.E.%�
W��n oFfhe N. h: %4 oFSec_ 12, af a poinf disfant � 26 fc�i Soufherly of the ��
� NorfhWest corner o/' 1he SE '/� o{fhe N.W. /� said Sec. 1 2.
� ? e�
zm 11S T,�
< �cL-���-�l� Su[��.�t�ts t�"�"
�_ � .
CITY OF FRIDLEY p
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
(612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLAT APPLICATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached
Address: l C ` /� L . / ,� _ - � : �' / �% C..0 N .
Property Identification Number (PIN) {2 � `� 3 n .� � � �% �;
r
Legal description: �,�}i��' c� � �c� j L �. VL'. �j-
Lot Block TracdAddition
Current zoning: _� j Squaze foota.ge/acreage i 1�i- �`�-� S�►t-�� , Z•� ��A(
Reason for plat: � c � � l�t,+, .� }� cc.(Z �,c .� c�.t,,� e _
Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license?
Yes �_ No If yes, which city? � 2/ 7 L�. �
If yes, what rype of business? `�Q S� Q` W1 F��—
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No i�
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers: Fee
NAME �r2 c= ' � ��� �
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE l � ;-- f �
must sign this form prior to processing)
� ., — -
DAYTIlVIE PHONE
DATE r1 �
PETITIONER INFORMATION
NAME� C�' �---t t�' C�.-� �I. I O�-Nv1
ADDRES S � �'�� i=�� iZ C� S� D� 1� r2 N-�� i � t� q L'� ,/L�i
SIGNATURE
�..
DAYTIME PHONE �% � �F `� y �F `�L
DATE � >I '
Fee: $500.00 for 201ots $ 15.00 for each additional lot
Pecmit P.S. # �?� -D7�_ Receipt # �,I � ,�
Application received by:
Scheduled Planning Commission date: � l/ `� 3
Scheduled City Council date:
11T
_
_
UIYOF
�R[DLEY
FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(6l2) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287
July 16, 1993
Advanced Surveys & Engineering Company
5300 S. Highway No. 101
Minnetonka, MN 55345
Gentlemen:
Subject: Tam Addition Drainage Review
The following are items to be addressed concerning the above subject.
PW93-139
1. Provide hydrology calcu(ations and determine ponding volumes. Show
calculations for ponding volumes. Provide a minimum of one foot of freeboard
on the pond.
2. Provide hydraulic calculations for restricted outlet and pipe design.
3. Locate pond entirely on private property.
4. Provide skimmer structure detail for outlet of pond.
5. Show driveway elevation. The driveway should be designed to prevent runoff
from entering from Fireside Drive.
6. Provide a rip-rap detail, include filter fabric under rip-rap.
7. A pond maintenance agreement needs to be executed between the owner and
City of Fridley.
8. Include an erosion control plan.
9. Additional comments may be forthcoming pending further review.
Sincerely,
Scott Erickson
Assistant Public Works Director
11U
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING, AIIGII3T 11, 1993
_______________________________________________________________�_
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Newman called the August 11, 1993, Planning
Commission meeting to o'rder at 7:30 p.m. /
ROLL CALL•
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Dave Newman, Dave
Brad Sielaff, Conn
Diane Savage, �Roy Oquist
, Dean Saba,
Others Present: Barbara D y, Community Development Director
Michel cPherson, Planning Assistant
Oliv Tam, 1150 Fireside Drive N.E.
J ce Moen, 1128 - 63rd Avenue N.E.
oyce Trebisovsky, 1130 Fireside Drive N.E.
MOTIONi35y Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the July
28, �f93, Planning Commission minutes as written.
' A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER30N NEWMAN DECLARED
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, P.S.
�9_3-03, BY OLIVER TAM, TAM ADDITION: To replat property
described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing
at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast
corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if
extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a
point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of
the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of
beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing
westerly along said last described line a distance of 288
feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence
easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence
southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the
point of beginning. This property is generally located at
1160 Fireside Drive N.E.
11V
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGUST 11, 1993 PAGE 2
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL YOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:33 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is processing three land use
requests. One is a plat request to subdivide the subject parcel
which is addressed as 1160 Fireside Drive, located between the
two mobile home parks east of Highway 65 into three lots. The
second request is to rezone a portion of the subject parcel from
C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3, General Multiple
Dwelling District. The third request is a variance request to
address the existing encroachments by the restaurant facility
currently located on the property. On August 17, 1993, the
Appeals Commission recommended approval of the variance request
to the City Council.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is proposing to replat the
existing parcel into three separate parcels. Two parcels are
proposed to be used for two new four-unit residential dwellings,
and the third parcel is for the existing restaurant facility.
There are currently two dwelling units on the lots proposed for
the two new four-unit dwellings.
Ms. McPherson stated the lots for the multiple family dwellings
meet the minimum lot area and lot width requirements as required
by the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District. Each lot meets
the minimum 15,000 square foot area requirement and also meets
the minimum lot width of 85 feet. Each parcel has a minimum of
25 feet of access from a public street. The second lot achieves
its access via a"flag lot". While typically a flag lot is not
an ideal subdivision pattern, there is adequate room on the
remainder of the parcel for a cul-de-sac should the parcel change
use at a later date, and additional right-of-way could be
dedicated to the east of the easterly lot line and a public
street could be constructed for a future subdivision.
Ms. McPherson stated the remaining portion of the subject parcel
is for the existing restaurant facility. The lot area exceeds
the minimum of 35,000 square feet as required for the C-3,
General Shopping Center District. There is not a minimum lot
width requirement in the C-3 district, however, there is adequate
room on site for the parcel to meet the minimum setback and
parking requirements, with the exception of the two existing
encroachments on the southwest corner of the property for the
restaurant facility.
Ms. McPherson stated a portion of the restaurant's parking lot
and access does encroach onto the multiple family lot as
proposed. Cross parking and access easements will need to be
recorded against both the proposed restaurant property as well as
the proposed multiple dwelling property.
11W
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 3
Ms. McPherson stated that as part of the overall plat request,
the petitioner is proposing to improve the parking lot and
provide the required B618 concrete curb and gutter as required
City Code. A landscaping plan should be submitted by the
petitioner to provide adequate screening and buffering between
the restaurant facility and the proposed multi-unit buildings.
detention facility will also be required as part of the parking
lot upgrade. The Engineering Department will require the
by
A
petitioner to sign and record against the property a storm water
pond maintenance agreement. The Engineering Department has
reviewed the preliminary grading plan and has submitted a list of
comments via the surveyor to the petitioner.
Ms. McPherson stated that as the plat request meets the minimum
requirements of each of the zoning districts, staff recommends
that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request to
the City Council with the following stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall submit the information requested
in Scott Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993,
regarding the stormwater pond and the grading and
drainage plan.
2. The petitioner shall record against proposed Lots 2 and
3, Block 1, Tam Addition, cross parking and access
easements.
3.
�
The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan.
The petitioner shall execute and record against the
property a stormwater pond maintenance agreement.
5. The park dedication shall be $1,500 per lot,for the
residential portion and $.023 per square foot for the
remaining portion for the restaurant facility. (shall
be paid at the time of the issuing of the building
permit - for residential)
Mr. Newman stated that access to the flag lot would really be
through the parking lot and that the residential property would
have to negotiate parking spaces with the restaurant property.
Has the City ever done anything like this before?
Ms. McPherson stated that typically most of the cross parking
easements have occurred between two commercial properties or two
industrial properties. In reviewing this request, the City
Assessor suggested that perhaps the flag could be rotated so that
the flag portion is on the westerly side, and the access would
then occur over the driveway for the other multiple family
dwelling. Then, the back yard of the second multiple family
dwelling would be facing the restaurant facility. However, that
eliminates the potential for any future subdivision and public
roadway.
11X
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AUGIIST 11 1993
PAGE 4
Mr. Kondrick stated that when the restaurant is having a
successful evening, the possibility exists that there will be
times when there are no parking spaces for the multiple family
dwellings.
Ms. Dacy stated the petitioner is proposing a four stall garage.
If that is a concern, the owner can post a sign reserving the
first four stalls for additional parking. That has been done for
commercial developments.
Mr. Newman stated that if, in fact, the multiple family property
is under separate ownership from the restaurant property, then
how is the City going to get the additional 25 feet to put in the
public roadway.
Ms. Dacy stated that in answer to that concern, as part of the
plat request, they should reserve a 25 foot street easement along
the entire length of the flag to reserve that option. Maybe the
following two stipulations should be added in the event the
restaurant property should ever return to residential:
6. If ththeeSarkingtlot encroachmentsis�removeddfromathese
use, p
two properties.
7. The dedication of the street easement
Mr. Oliver Tam stated he is the owner of the Rice Bowl
Restaurant. He stated he is very appreciative of staff's ideas
and suggestions to make the lot work for everyone involved.
Mr. Kondrick asked if the petitioner agreed with the stipulations
recommended by staff.
Mr. Tam stated he had no problems with the stipulations.
Mr. Newman asked if the petitioner understood that the City may
require a 25 foot street easement.
Mr. Tam stated he had no objection to that, whatever works best
for the property.
Ms. Joyce Trebisovsky, 1130 Fireside Drive N.E., stated she
represents Park Plaza Mobile Home Park aadkEntalotMobiex anded to
Park. Her only concern is that if the p g p
the right side of the property, there should be some typeaok-
barrier so the lights do not shine into the mobile home p
Mr. Newman stated that, at this time, there is no proposal to
move the parking lot. If in the future, the owner decides to
replat the restaurant property and break it into residential in
then at that time a public street would go in. However,
lots, o awa If any of
all likelihood the parking lot would also g Y-
11Y
PLANNING COMMISSION ME�TING. AUGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 5
this happens, there would be another public hearing, notices
would be sent out, and this process would repeat itself.
Ms. Trebisovsky thanked Mr. Newman for this clarification.
Mr. Saba stated he did not think it is a good situation to have a
cross parking easement between commercial and residential.
Ms. McPherson stated the proposed multi-family units are not
intended to be the typical general occupancy units. They are for
Mr. Ta�'s family and employees of the Rice Bowl, and he will be
the owner of both the properties.
Ms. Modig stated that is fine for the present time; but if, in
the future, Mr. Tam sells the property, then there is a parking
lot situation with a cross parking easement and two pieces of
property under separate ownership.
Ms. Dacy stated there have been instances on commercial
properties where signs reserving parking spaces are successful.
The Code requires eight parking spaces for each multi-family
dwelling unit, and they already have four garage spaces. That
leaves only four spaces that are needed, and she believed those
spaces can be reserved. She did not see a big conflict with the
cross parking easement.
Ms. Modig stated the only times she could see the parking being a
problem is during private parties or large events at the
restaurant.
Ms. Dacy stated that if the Commission feels strongly about this,
then one solution would be to flipflop the flag to the west side
of the property.
Mr. Saba stated he could not see a problem with a cross parking
easement with commercial/commercial properties, but he did see
potential problems with commercialJresidential.
Ms. Modig stated she did not see a problem now with the proposed
usage of the multiple family units by Mr. Tam's family members.
Her concern is for the future. If the property is sold and the
new owners do not want the cross parking easement, does the City
have to get involved?
Ms. Dacy stated staff is recommending that the cross parking
easement be executed as part of the plat approval. If there are
any changes, then both owners would have to agree to that.
Ms. Dacy stated that in looking at the plat, there might be
enough area on site ta create a little pad for four parking
spaces on each lot separate from the commercial property. Staff
could work with the petitioner on this.
y1Z
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 11, 1993 PAGE 6
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:00 P.M.
Mr. Newman stated staff has done the best they can with some
undesirable choices. He did not particularly like the cross
parking easement, b�t he did think that keeping the flag on the
east side of the property preserves some options for the future.
There might be some problems with the cross parking easement in
the future, but those are the types of issues that are better
left resolved by the property owners. In the cases of
redevelopment, there are going to be some problems in working
around existing structures. He stated he is comfortable with
approving the plat with the stipulations as recommended by staff,
with the addition of a stipulation to vacate the street easement
and to terminate the cross parking easement upon change in use of
restaurant or discontinuation of use of the lot.
Mr. Saba stated he is not comfortable with the cross parking
easement. It is a good situation.now, but what about the future?
What if the restaurant changes to a night club, and there are
even �ore cars in the parking lot? He would like to see
something else worked out with the parking.
Ms. Modig stated that she did not have a problem with the flag
lot. She would like to figure out something to do with the cross
parking easement if it becomes a problem in the future without
having to go through this whole process again.
Ms. Dacy asked if the Commission members would like staff to
explore the possibility of finding a separate area for eight
spaces other than on the comme_rcial lot.
Ms. Modig stated she is just concerned about the cross parking
becoming an issue in the future, and it may never be an issue.
Mr. Sielaff stated that if it is possible, he would like to see
the parking kept on the residential lots to prevent any future
parking problems.
Mr. Kondrick stated he would also be in favor of the present
configuration with access into the lots with eight parking spaces
on the residential lots.
Mr. Newman stated he had no problem with that, except that would
mean blacktopping more area of the overall site to put in eight
more stalls.
Ms. Modig stated she would be comfortable with trying to put
eight parking spaces on the residential lots.
1 yAA
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, ADGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 7
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend
approval of preliminary plat, P.S. #93-03, by Oliver Tam, Tam
Addition, to replat property described as that part of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12,
Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as
follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the
northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which,
if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point
distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a
distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the
land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last
described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a
distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance
of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396
feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally
located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., with the following
stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall submit the information requested
in Scott Erickson's letter dated July 16, 1993,
regarding the stormwater pond and the grading and
drainage plan.
2. The petitioner shall record against proposed Lots 2 and
3, Block 1, Tam Addition, cross parking and access
easements.
�
4.
The petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan.
The petitioner shall execute and record against the
property a stormwater pond maintenance agreement.
5. The park dedication shall be $1,500 per lot for the
residential portion and $.023 per square foot for the
remaining portion for the restaurant facility. Payment
of the park dedication fee for the residential
properties shall be paid at the time of the issuance of
the building permit.
�
7.
Mr. Newman
motion, he
parking.
situation.
A 25 foot street easement shall be dedicated on the
easterly portion of the flag lot for a future road.
Staff shall work with the petitioner to provide eight
parking spaces within both residential lots.
stated that although he would vote in favor of the
did not think they need to require this additional
However, it is a good approach to a difficult
- -
� _
�
Community Development Department
PLANIVING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: September 9, 1993
TO: William Burns, City Manager���
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Establish Public Hearing for Rezoning Request,
ZOA #93-01, by Oliver Tam; 1160 Fireside Drive
N.E.
The Planning Commission reviewed the rezoning request by Oliver Tam
to rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center to R-3,
Multiple Family Dwelling, at its August 11, 1993 meeting. The
Fridley Zoning Code requires that the City Council conduct a public
hearing for all rezoning requests. Staff recommends that the City
Council establish September 27, 1993 as the date of the public
hearing.
MM/dn
M-93-498
REQUEST
Permit Number
Applicant
Proposed
Request
�ocation
SITE DATA
Size
Density
Present Zoning
Present Land Use(s)
Adjacent
Zoning
Adjacent Land Use(s)
Utilities
Park Dedication
Watershed District
ANALYSIS
�inancial I mplication s
Conformance to the
Comprehensive Plan
Compatibility with Adjacent
Zoning and Uses
Environmental
Considerations
� RECONIMENDATION
Staff
Appeals Commission
� Planning Commission
� _
Author - 1"IM:ls
S TAFF REP O RT
Community Development Department
Appeals Commission Date
Planning Commission Date August 11, 1993
City Council Date� September 13, 1993
ZOA #93-01
Oliver Tam
To rez�e a portion of a paroel fn�n C-3, General Shopping
�n�ter District, to F�-3, General Multipl.e Dwelling
1160 Firesic�e Drive
114,048 sq. ft.; 2.61 acres
C-3, General Shopping Center Dis trict
Retaii/Residential
R-4, Mobile Home Park, to E& W; C-3, General Shopping Center
District, to S& N; N�l, Lic�t Industrial, to the S
Residential tA the E& W; Vacant to the S; Retail to the N
Rioe Creek
Approval with stipulations
Approval with stipulations
`,s�
��� � +�vi'Y
� ...,.Lr �
(3(sd
' '
ZOA �F93-01
Oliver Tam
lV' //2 SEC. /2, T. 31�, R. 2�
n
C/TY OF FRlDLEY
� 2�
`�
I � �2
24 ,` 3 � 13
O
� I
ia��, .
� ,
��
11EE LOCATlON MAP
ZOA ��93-01
Oliver Tam
� ,r-� r,��rT'
1 � FF ZONING MAP
Staff Report
ZOA #93-01,
Page 2
Request
1160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam
The petitioner requests that a rezoning be approved to rezone Lots
2 and 3, Tam Addition, from C-3, General Shopping Center District,
to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling. The request is for 1160
Fireside Drive.
The rezoning request is for parcels which do not currently exist.
The petitioner is processing a plat request to subdivide the
subject parcel into three parcels. The petitioner is also
processing a variance request to correct existing encroachments for
the restaurant located on one of the subject parcels.
Site
Located on the subject parcel is Tam's Fireside Rice Bowl
Restaurant and two dwelling units. The property is zoned C-3,
General Shopping Center District, as are the properties to the
north and south. The properties to the east and west are zoned R-
4, Mobile Home Park.
Analysis
Three criteria need to be evaluated in analyzing any rezoning
request:
1.
2.
District compatibility with adjacent uses and zoning.
District intent.
3. Whether or not the parcel meets the district
requirements.
The petitioner has indicated that the two subject parcels, Lots 2
and 3 of the proposed Tam's Addition, will be used for two new 4-
unit buildings. Currently located on the property are two dwelling
units which are nonconforming in the C-3, General Shopping Center
District. Because R-4 zoning and uses exist on both sides of the
parcel, rezoning the parcels to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling,
should not cause any adverse impact.
The intent of the R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District is to
provide zoning for multiple family, two-family, and single family
dwellings. The existing and proposed uses of the subject parcel
are consistent with the intent of the R-3, General Multiple
Dwelling district, and would eliminate an existing nonconformity.
11 GG
Staff Report
ZOA #93-01, 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., by Oliver Tam
Page 3
The proposed subject parcels meet the minimum requirements of the
R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District, regulations. The minimum
lot area, lot width, and access requirements are met by the subject
parcels as they are proposed to be subdivided. The proposed
location of the new dwelling units conform to the setback
requirements, and the existing dwelling units would also comply
with the setback requirements in their present locations.
Recommendation
As the proposed rezoning request meets the criteria used to
evaluate rezoning requests, staff recommends that the Planning
Commission recommend approval of the request to the City Council
with one stipulation:
1. P.S. #93-03 shall be approved.
Planning Commission Action
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the rezoning request to the City Council.
Citv Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
11HH
� � -H
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
�I
�'
�
(612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
REZONII�TG APPLICATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached
Address: % � �`"✓ � �t' %1 e�` � �flC� , � Y2 �Yv �'� . /�1- �- _ ��l � O � �/
Property Identification Number (PIN)_ ��`� � O a�- a�{-- � o O�
Legal description: _ �,9-�� c�'� ��e.� f,Z /�%.L�% �
Lot Block � TracdAddition
Cunrent zoning: C� Square footagelacrea.ge �' /� ��� � 0 2�• G��� C
Requesting zoning:
Reason for rezoning
Have you opera.ted a nusmess in a ciry wtucn requ�red a business license'!
Yes �_ No If yes, which city? T IZ �` �J �� ,
If yes, what type of business? �1 '�s��l �,l1,l�-c��—
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No �
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing)
NAME
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
PETITIOI�
NAME �
ADDRESS �
SIGNATURE
�
L�
�
v �--� �
.�
DAYTIlVIE PHONE
DATE � 7 -�
2.
DAYTIMEPHONE "7�°�i —��- �� Z
DATE �f-�21'I J�
Fee: $300.00 - — ' � 1 � �
Permit ZOA # �'D I Receirt #
Application received by:
Scheduled Planning Commission date: I 1 ��
Scheduled City Council daxe:
111i
pLANNING COMMIS3ION MEETING AIIGIIST 11 1993
PAGE 8
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWM2�N DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOOSLY.
2, PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING ZOA 93-01 BY
OLIVER TAM: To rezone property from C-3, General Shopping
Center to R-3, General Multiple Dwelling on property
described as that part of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing
at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the northeast
corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which, if
extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a
point distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of
the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said
Section 12, a distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of
beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing
westerly along said last described line a distance of 288
feet; thence northerly a distance of 396 feet; thence
easterly at a right angle a distance of 288 feet; thence
southerly at a right angle a distance of 396 feet to the
point of beginning. This property is generally located at
1160 Fireside Drive N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
UPON OTIONCCARRIED AND THEIPOBLIC�HEARINGEOPEN AT�8z15Dp M�ED
THE M
Ms. McPherson stated that currently, the two dwelling units are
located on the same parcel as the restaurant. These dwelling
units are currently nonconforming as residential uses are not
permitted in the C-3, General Shopping Center District. In order
to allow the petitioner to even upgrade the existing dwellings or
construct new ones as he is proposing, the property needs to be
rezoned from C-3, General Shopping Center District, to R-3,
General Multiple Dwelling.
Ms. McPherson stated the rezoning request only pertains to the
proposed lots for the multiple family dwelling units. The
remaining parcel will remain C-3, General Shopping Center
District.
Ms. McPherson stated three criteria need to be evaluated in
analyzing any rezoning request:
l.
�
District compatibility with adjacent uses and zoning
District intent
11 JJ
pLANNING COMMISSION MEBTING AIIGOST 11 1993 PAGE 9
3. Whether or not the parcel meets the district
requirements
Ms. McPherson stated that as discussed earlier during the plat
request, the proposed iots under the sui�division ordinance meet
the minimum requirements of the R-3, General.Multiple Dwelling
District. Also, the proposed use of the twv lots for multiple
family dwelling units is also consistent with the purpose of the
R-3, General Multiple Dwelling District, which is to provide
zoning for multiple family, two family, and single family
dwellings.
Ms. McPherson stated the adjacent properties are zoned R-4,
Mobile Home Park, so rezoning the two properties to R-3 would not
have an adverse impact on the R-4 residential zoning.
Ms. McPherson stated that as the request meets the criteria for
evaluation of a rezoning request, staff recommends the Planning
Commission recommend approval of the rezoning request with one
stipulation:
l. Preliminary plat request, P.S. #93-03, shall be
approved.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public
hearing. ,
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, AI,L DOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THS PQBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:20 P.M.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to recommend to
City Council approval of rezoning, ZoA #93-01, by Oliver Tam, to
rezone property from C-3, General Shopping Center to R-3, General
Multiple Dwelling on property described as that part of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 12,
Township 30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, described as
follows: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 12 distant 726 feet southerly of the
northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter of said Section 12; thence westerly along a line which,
if extended, would intersect the west line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12 at a point
distant 726 feet southerly of the northwest corner of the
Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 12, a
distance of 661.45 feet to the actual point of beginning of the
land to be described, thence continuing westerly along said last
described line a distance of 288 feet; thence northerly a
distance of 396 feet; thence easterly at a right angle a distance
of 288 feet; thence southerly at a right angle a distance of 396
feet to the point of beginning. This property is generally
located at 1160 Fireside Drive N.E., with the following
stipulation:
11KK
1- Preliminary plat request, P.S. #93-03, shall be
approved_
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY.
Ms. McPherson stated the City Council will conduct a public
hearing for the preliminary plat and rezoning requests on
September 27, 1993.
3• SAV � 93-p3 $y THE CITY �F FRIDLEY: To vacate all easements
as donated and dedicated to the public for drainage and
utility purposes and as shown on the recorded plat of
Shorewood Plaza, as corrected by Surveyor's Certifica
files as Document No. 176792. Al1 in Anoka County,
Minnesota.
This property is generally located at the inter ction of
Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between H'ghway 65 and
Central Avenue.
The subject parcels include the East and W st Moore Lake
Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet im and Health
Club, and Sears Outlet.
Ms. McPherson stated the Planning Commiss'on recently reviewed a
plat request by the City of Fridle to
plat which was approved by the City in 987at New easements forza
utility, drainage, and bikeway/walkwa purposes are to be
dedicated on the new revised plat. n order to avoid any
confusion, staff is suggesting tha the existing easements which
are not being utilized by the ut' ities or various bikeway/
walkways be vacated prior to re ording the plat with its
associated easements. A numbe of utilities constructed within
this development were not lo ated within the easements as they
were dedicated. The City i ensuring that appropriate easements
are being dedicated over ose utilities to provide proper access
for the City.
Ms. McPherson stated
Commission recommen.
will ensure that t e
recording of the ew
�'taff recommends that the Planning
approval of this vacation request. Staff
vacation ordinance is recorded prior to the
plat.
MOTI�N by Mr. aba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend to City
Council appr al of SAV #93-03, by the City of Fridley to vacate
all easemeryts as donated and dedicated to the
and utili�i purposes and as shown on the recordedlplat�ofdrainage
Shorewo Plaza, as corrected by Surveyor's Certificate files as
Docume No. 176792. All in Anoka County, Minnesota.
This property is generally located at the intersection of
Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Highway 65 and
Central Avenue.
11LL
U
� �
-�
DATE:
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
September 9, 1993
TO: William Burns, City Manager A��
��t
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT:
Establish Public Hearing for Vacation Request,
SAV #93-03, by the City of Fridley �
The Planning Commission reviewed the vacation request by the City
of Fridley, to vacate all easements within the Shorewood Plaza plat
at its August 11, 1993 meeting. The City Charter requires the City
Council to conduct a public hearing regarding all vacation
requests. Staff recommends that the City Council establish
September 27, 1993 as the date of the public hearing.
MM/dn
M-93-499
;�
REQUEST
Permit Number
Applicant
Proposed
Request
�ocation
SITE DATA
Size
Densit�r
Present Zoning
Present Land Use(s)
Adjacent
Zoning
Adjacent Land Use(s)
Utilities
Park Dedication
� Watershed District
ANALYSIS
Financial Implications
Conformance to the
Comprehensive Plan
Compatibility with Adjacent
Zoning and Uses
Environmental
Considerations
� RECOMMENDATION
Staff
Appeals Commission
Planning Commission
Author NIl�I:1s
S TAFF REP O RT
Community Development Department
Appeals Commission Date
Planning Commission Date August 11, 1993
City Council Date : September 13, 1993
SAV #9 3-0 3
City of Fridley
To vacate all easements dedicated on the plat of
Shorewood Plaza
Highway 65 and East Nbore Lake Drive
C-3, General Shopping Center District
Retail
C-3, Gerieral Shopping Center, to the W; 1�1, Single Family
Dwelling, to the N& E; P, Public, to the S
Retail to the W, Residential to the N& E, Park to the S
N/A
Ric� C�eek
Approval
Approval
� --
Staff Report
SAV #93-03, City of Fridley
Page 2
Request
The City of Fridley, in conjunction with the adjacent property
owners are currently processing a replat of Shorewood Plaza. The
replat request is required in order to correct errors which
occurred during the design of East Moore Lake Drive N.E. Related
to the replat request is a vacation request to vacate existing
easements dedicated as part of the original Shorewood Plaza plat.
The request is generally located between Central Avenue and Highway
65 on either side of East Moore Lake Drive. The properties
involved include the old Shorewood Shopping Center, the Sears
Outlet building, the Moore Lake Racquet, Swim & Health Club, and
East Moore Lake Commons.
The Planning Commission reviewed the revised plat at its July 14,
1993, meeting. The Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve the revised plat as proposed. Dedicated on the
plat are new utility easements for bikeway/walkway purposes as well
as drainage and utility easements for the various utilities serving
the development. The utilities as installed do not fall within the
easements originally dedicated on the Shorewood Plaza plat. These
easements should therefore be vacated as they are unnecessary The
necessary easements will be recorded when the revised plat is
recorded at the County.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval
of the vacation request to the City Council.
Planninq Commission Action
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the request to the City Council.
City Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
1100
r - - ...
.�
P�'G LiM intil �zY �L�T
S�ID�C �OD� �L,� ZA _
�� �
h /
. \ /' '_��p /I ' H1� ,
v • �-
� t 1` �N�,�, .
,i-4L;�' ' \ i 0,�1e; �,+ ���
:-,. � �- . ,, :.�. ,
�f//?•=��`�,y � '�;o `�%�,4 ,: �i .
..�i /?�� \ `• :. ir � r ti
_� �//,/> .
� �
�`\ �e �S�/`��, , i
:r o' P
z � O
. \
� I •4
. . i •�
� + �
� ! �
/
�
I� ��! � /
.. . ` . -`i ., �`:.
. �, � _ S �'H�� _ � 1'� `�� �
\ ' Oe: .I��.
`^ ' ; ' ..._'"_' ' _..___
� y . I_ .��.
;%
, .:.:�, ..: :,...
� f� '' j - - -�°i . . ?� _, ' _:
r! i ;� - _ �. _
'� '_ . a�►�.K�
'n ` =r "� - _.. ;
. _ j..
�; ;
; � ; ; �_:
.. ; .
, ;;�- .
_ -
- ' . .. . ;::9_ -
�. _ _ -
� .. , ,`
` ! ', - .. `� �"-.�..._r 1 �
_ `j �a `_ ..... � _�— � _� 7571 —
� MooRE
p LAKE
��---�_
'� _ .`_' �.:...,, �.;<
4. b'�
• �..� .{
w•........ �.w
I� I
_ �T/ ��. I � __
� Fl�;
•�� �. '
' _" _ _ �• ! _.
� Se ' 1
� ,�� ,
I
(�^
d i.
I ..=
1
. I'�
:!
•, t i
. '��
. I!
. I1
. �I
i •�
i
�
�
i
i
I
. L � � ,! ' '.,'�
i I
-_�j _ __'- — i . . _l
` L�� � � 1
j-- - — µ . s..� /j �� �
i.,..•..� �c. . t•
11PP
Original Easements to be Vacated
� I
1 �
. �
w
PRELIMINARY PLAT . �
SHOREWOOD ' PLAZA REVISED . • .. � . r
.,, �
�^� �°,. .�a. � �. .�m ,� .,. �.�. , .. ���.a„ �..� ��, �........� �:.:.. �� �
�N�own0 n�u. .r N re�la� 1� R++n�� M.�� !�. �a� Ow+l. r �+�.� M�� w� rn� y.M+�
I�W w�tt el wu� 4u YIMIM 1/ �.! .rxl� M 1�� Yt ti�� 1w�Y.�.r
Wtsv� w'tw wtrl IR�u Ylpw� .�f. ��w���`��Y�� "
..mr:t- •�u� r. .f....� 9.199!
; �=:; ��-�: �,...�,: ��, � � c.�
o..��,� � . u.. �r���—
I�at l. l: aubt �. l..a s..a Rw<u4W �i .. - �W�+r41A �
�af�m� tlu� IruM� N �le�u� �. t 't� / � Y, �� 4• .
1.LL
�`i`�y•'���,����, IMII �IVIY111�IY
u.:.w wr ri...'. u.w r...a natin �r. ni
�i �� ...�u . .b..a m��r e u. r�...� .n.nm w..�. u ....�.a .
w w�u�i ...�n r a..nu.a uemrx w. ltMt t� a W� <Li.., u �V:C C:KE�K 1'•.:tItK.4:
. .. o.r� mr .ru r. w�.srwr.� a u. twl rLa.
„ .�w.,.:.�..�.,�,�.....�..�w ��._,..a _...�. � .��� WF � d� ,. , _ J .
e�,.H..w�w�..u.,w. .��,� ..�..:�,..,. ,:,, - ,.,,. �
u�rit � . f Ima .�b la Iuw� �N'.Y� /�eYd'�1. L :Iti'�� SK!i :.(JL ll'1r�N �—� �• �
� /,. �, _
�..sc �r - w �m� .w tx .WaM �V.+t. vw�..r 1ra.ua.'.1�+. '
'..�s Y. U Isa .r K Imt .Y� W�r �M.R� /rP�. \`/ PU': LCil' b
u.rs -o' • �a w� .w. �a .n.� W w�w. +�r. .�+ �•d•�+w r�.�.+• /' �.uww. •
u.�e -r - u �.w .a. �a tw.w �4wr -.urr kw. 4��?:4k_Y4U.^. � uS:l _
O UTLOT B • �
�� r.w�. w! .r �..�.+� ��.w r r.+ w�ww wvw. - � fj ���
..-mu m.m. \� VR r � e r-M ��r m.m «w�
.� w� ... u.v ...
I^ �in ��. •r.:: I , t.:.:c::l \ 4y O • • ' r"
� .... e ...�� � ��/�i:, . �.�E � / ��• �
� ..,:''''�.._/ � �I .v �
� "���:;':,� ; � OUTLOT A / Q' � I
.' � " � � i �
j �oT ` . � 41 / O W �
[ . •.t.V�ti �� �
� �'T�'�Y / O,L � W
N > �'O RE � ��T , �-' �.�% :�� � � �
,o � IqKE �OT 'C` � �' � L,� �� / "
�OT WESt A �'/ �//�• j.' LOT 3. J C,
,.,. y e FrAI� � '� f ;,c Q 2
z '^�..�t ... COL•K 4 E+ITER �� �/ � /�' BLOCK 2 �' I
��„ ? � �c�a � � f, ` Q ,
a � 't o� '/ 4i di
.
= i O�� , ��`V J I
� � � � o
� ' �4/ MOORE I.AKE EAST
t '
: � �I)
i � • .
Y S ✓�� j . w.«...
� ....�
� EAST MOORE � "LAKt I�` yJ
j- �r..✓� ww. i II'� � �
i --- -: =---='- - -- ' � ��� �
t.. t i. u�.ac.n t o.:c:v:wcc.t� r•:::c.� 1i � W
�, � LOT 1 , BLOCK � � +- - � � <
W >` `
r'Y', 1.�, � � i� �MOORE LAKE RAGQUET
Q ��i -- = a� �� �
� �� sE.P.RS ' � . L awiM � �r.���r►+ cwe � ,
� � SUR�LU� �I 'Y+ O O ; - I.
V! RtTA1L ` t S� � ' i
�� cexZeR +' �, � a,i, O, ` l0T 2': Q I,
' � '' K 3 1 , ^ �r
I,W,rc,•- j' `J ..v' r �•�� ,° 3I � BLOCK 2 �.- �
� �'� s' � .ti r Q� 1 � � � � � . , z �
, /� '� � ;o � �
Irr��-4 j r. I � y` .—.''.�..-r._.�
I I � �=J�_ '^'_ O • „t" �l� �
uY :il I �r.., . a P v _- I
:.7:.�TOx°� :.F:Eb � I � N .
•',_ep:�r,5:-u .. . y j� � ucT f
1:.). 93 I �••�•• •,S.:iA'�CY s J � �� , 1.iVITGR".� — �/ I
... .. _ � �
I - -- � �
...., .._,,. �.� ..... ��••b��,.,�, _ _�
Q � � o .NUML't.il stl /
I � i 1• ....'c o
. .. .
_ I • , • /
, .� "_'�__ .. ' -:.-�' � l �..artv wa.�a.r+ �c•
_ _ _ � "' "'_'�—' "
�- - .� �� -.i —� ���`� . _' _ _ .� '
' �\ -
MOORE LAKE ' » Y r ,t, ,r •
u..n.�c �x..�c W FIaT
1CAll � 111KM • W r6tT
—.— � �w�T�.1aY w �
—� — � NO�M MMVI � Y�RlC��Oy - . �
- —.— . w.Ttw vu.�.�
---�Mw.Lt \/wY��VIIY 4KMCN�I.�NL �
--- � ��K��.L Y a V.�IMW� 4w
J �.�� . KK�aTOr w0lAGUl� �O i�sw•. CYAO
� ■ QQ �i • �Iwl MvDRµT I
New water/Sewer/Drainage Easements
P�
�
1.
preliminary plat request, P•S• #93
approved. /
RPERSON NEAM�►N DECLARED
�shall be
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOII5LY
Ms. McPherson stated t City Council
for the pre ' inary plat and
hearing
27 -
will conduct a public
rezoning requests on
September ,
3, SAV 93-03 BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY: To vacate all easements
as donated and dedicated to the public for drainage and
ur oses and as shown on the recorded plat of
utility p P gu�-veyor's Certificate
Shorewood Plaza, as corrected by
files as Document No. 176792. All in Anoka County,
Minnesota. f
This property is generally located at the intershWay 65°and
Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Hig
Central Avenue.
The subject parcels include the East e�dsWimtarid°Healthe
Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racqu
Club and Sears Outlet.
Ms. McPherson stated the Planning Commission recently reviewed a
the City of Fridley to replat the Shorewood Plaza
plat request by the City in 1987- New easements for
plat which was approved by ur oses are to be
utility, drainaqe, and bikeway/Wal�aY P P
dedicated on the new revised plat. In order to avoid any
confusion, staff is suggesting that the existing easements which
are not being utilized by the utilities or various bikeway/
walkways be vacated prior to recording the plat with its
associated easements. A number �� uthintthe easem ntseas theyn
this development were not located Wl that appropriate easements
were dedicated. The City is ensuring rovide proper access
are being dedicated over those utilities to p
for the City.
est. Staff
� Ms. McPherson staend atarovalCOf thas vacation Pe�nln
', � Commission recomm PP rior to the
� will ensure that the via�tion ordinance is recorded p
f the new p
record�ng o
seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to recommend to City
MOTION by Mr. Saba, b the City o£ Fridley to vacate
Council approval of SAV #93-03, Y ublic for drainage
all easements as donated and dedicated to the p �at of
and utility purposes and as shown on the recorded p
Shorewood Plaza, as corrected bY�kauCounty,SMinnesotaate files as
Document No. 176792. All in An
This property is qenerally located at the intershWay°65°and
Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive between Hig
Central Avenue.
11RR
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AOGIIST 11, 1993 PAGE 11
The subject parcels include the East and West Moore Lake
Shopping Centers, the Northwest Raaquet Swim and Health
Club, and Sears Outlet.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
4. RECEIVE JULY 8 1993 HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receiv the July
8, 1993, Housing & Redevelopment Authority minutes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON/��1'��IMAN DECLARED
THE MOTiON CARRIED IINANiMOIISLY.
5.
�
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by� . Sielaff, to receive the
July 27, 1993, Appeals Commission 'nutes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING E, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIIS .
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Mr. Kondr , seconded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the
meeting. Upon a v ice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Newman
declared the mot on carried unanimously and the August 11, 1993,
Planning Commi�on meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
ly submitted,
ntf� �Saba � -
cording Secretary
11 SS
� _
�
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Community Development Department
PLANIVING DIVISION
City of Fridley
September 9, 1993
William Burns, City Manager �r��"
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Establish Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat
Request, P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley
The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat of Shorewood
Plaza Revised by the City of Fridley at its July 14, 1993 meeting.
The subdivision ordinance, Chapter 211 of the Fridley City Code,
requires the City Council to conduct public hearings for all plat
requests. Staff recommends that the City Council establish
September 27, 1993 as the date of the public hearing.
MM/dn
M-93-500
�
S TAFF REP O RT
� Community Development Department
Appeals Commission Date
Planning Commission Date: July 14 , 1993
City Council Date : September 13, 1993
REQUEST
Permit Number
Applicant '
Proposed
Request
Location
SITE DATA
Size
Density
Present Zoning
Present Land Use(s)
Adjacent
Zoning
Adjacent Land Use(s)
Utilities
Park Dedication
Watershed District
ANALYSIS
Financia! Implications
Conformance to the
Comprehensive Plan
Compatibility with Adjacent
Zoning and Uses
Environmental
Considerations
RECONIMENDATION
Staff
Appeals Commission
Planning Commission
Author �/dn
P.S. ��93-02
City of Fridley
To replat Shorewood Plaza to correct survey errors
Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive
C-3, General Shopping Center District
Retail
C-3, General Shopping Center to the West; R-1, Single
Family Dwelling to the North and East; P, Public, to
the South.
Retail to the West, residential to the North and East,
park to the South.
N/A
Rice Creek
Approval
Approval
Staff Report
P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley
Shorewood Plaza Revised
Page 2
Request
The City of Fridley, in conjunction with the adjacent property
owners, are proposing to replat the plat of Shorewood Plaza. The
request is in order to correct errors which occurred during the
design of East Moore Lake Drive N.E. Approval of the revised plat
will allow recording of bikeway/walkway, drainage, and utility
easements on the properties.
The request is generally located between Central Avenue and Highway
65 on either side of East Moore Lake Drive. Properties involved
include the old Shorewood Shopping Center, the Sears Outlet
building, the Moore Lake Racquet, Swim, and Health Club, and East
Moore Lake Commons.
Historv
The original Shorewood Plaza plat was approved by the City Council
in 1987. The plat review and approval was to allow development of
the adjacent properties. The City was also redesigning East Moore
Lake Drive to accommodate the inareased traffic. The City's
consultant had not designed the road to meet Minnesota State Aid
Street requirements, and the street design needed to be realigned.
As a result of the realignment, additional right-of-way not
dedicated on the recorded plat was needed to accommodate the
redesigned East Moore Lake Drive. A surveyor's certificate of
correction was recorded; however, easements for bikeway/walkway,
street, drainage, and utility purposes were unable to be recorded
against the plat.
The original Shorewood Plaza plat did not include the property
containing the old Shorewood Shopping Center located at the corner
of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake Drive. The revised plat will
include this parcel. As part of the revised Shorewood Plaza plat,
there are a number of outlots as well as a lot line between Lot 1,
Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 2, Shorewood Plaza Revised. Property ta
the west of this line is Torrens property, and property to the east
of this line is Abstract. A lot line must be created where the
boundaries between Torrens and Abstract property occur. All of the
proposed lots meet the minimum lot area and lot width requirements
for the C-3, General Shopping Center District regulations.
Road Curvatures
In order to correct the errors created by the change in alignment,
additional right-of-way must be dedicated for East Moore Lake
Drive. The following road curvatures must be corrected:
12B
Staff Report
P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley
Shorewood Plaza Revised
Page 3
* The north edge of East Moore Lake Drive in front of the old
shopping center.
* The south edge of East Moore Lake Drive in front of East Moore
Lake Commons.
Please refer to the drawings entitled �'Curvature Correction" which
depict the changes in right-of-way.
Utility Easements
Bikeway/Walkway
As part of the East Moore Lake Commons development, a bikeway/
walkway was installed adjacent to the south curb of East Moore Lake
Drive. This bikeway/walkway was not constructed within the right-
of-way; therefore, a bikeway/walkway easement defined as Utility
Easements B and D will be dedicated on the plat. In addition, a
bikeway/walkway was proposed for the southwest corner of the Moore
Lake Racquet, Swim, and Health Club property as part of the
original development. This bikeway/walkway was not constructed;
however, the City retained an easement in order to construct a
bikeway/walkway in the future. Please refer to the map entitled,
"Bikeway/Walkway Easements" for the depiction of the location of
the bikeway/walkway easements.
Sewer, Water, and Drainage Easements
The original Shorewood Plaza plat had a number of easements
dedicated for utility purposes. The utilities serving the new
development were not constructed within the originally dedicated
easements. The easements depicted on the map entitled, "Water,
Sewer, Drainage Easements" must be dedicated in order to allow the
City to access these utilities. Those easements which are depict�ed
as "hatched" areas are drainage easements, and contain storm water
detention ponds for the development. A vacation request to vacate
all easements dedicated under the original Shorewood Plaza plat
will be processed by the City and recorded prior to recording the
revised plat.
Outlot B
The City is currently working with the City of New Brighton in
order to use the treated water from the Twin City Army Ammunitions
Plant. A booster station is proposed to be located on Outlot B of
the Shorewood Plaza Revised plat. The City is currently
negotiating with the property owner to acquire either all or a
portion of Outlot B. It is possible that the booster station could
12C
�
Staff Report
P.S. #93-02, by
Shorewood Plaza
Page 4
the City of Fridley
Revised
be located on Outlot B with a single family dwelling unit. The
praposed drawing, entitled "Tentative Lot Split for Outlot B,
Shorewood Plaza" indicates a single family dwelling unit and the
booster station located on Outlot B. While the preliminary plat
does not include the proposed lot split, it is possible that the
lot split may be included in the final plat. .
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commissian recomnnend approval
of the plat request, P.S. #93-02, by the City of Fridley to the
City Council.
City staff will initiate the vacation request to vacate all
easements after Planning Commission action. There are no
recommended stipulations.
Planning Commission Action
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the request to the City Council.
City Council Recammendation
staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action.
12D
P.S. #87-06
Shorewood Plaza
P�'GLIMIN/-ll2Y I�L1�T
S,��Ol2C yt/ODl� 1�L�( ZA �
- t � = i� i
. . / / MM 1+� �{ �� � ' l� �
W��r��.� y1 �
_ ,, � � s ,s,�•,,r.
/; � .u.: .------ ----r. _. � � ,,,, _
\ ;�' t�,; y �,•..�... = _�;•.
..« • . �S ; • ,
�� 'a ..� • 9 , ,� _ �(
''v% . � ..r • '�. , '
� � . ` : p.Jtte� ,� .:' �o , �- -- — -- • - -- - — 1 `--
. ��:/� \ �. _� �7i: � i � S� ti� �
.'-/ • \ +4 + �
,• - , '�lI
� � .; .� : ,
Y /7 il/`�/�y a4 ,4i • �� �� �� . , I
. , j/.aj, \�.�� '``+ 4 / M1I ^+ `
_____�� /�ij/� , � ' � � �`�`
` 'r s%�' '/ !►i
`� Z �' r/o� � / Lot �
. . \ �n � l 276,�0!' d j � � � '
.i � .� / ;, �
� � • c / �`+ `` �. � r ~ j , ' i
• _ / ,,.
. i ti i,
.
. i �
II �
� Z . ' J
� �^ +,N � /,i.�� ` � 'L � f I
I j ; .I� �
� � ;; .,, �` � `f '' ` "°' j � ;
� i _ S ts•y-� _ � ✓ !,µ � �7 �• ��t � a � � � � �
� � � � � .�
i : - �i: ae-r , ..s 1 . � � �t�. � . �
� , R � � \ �Pi��-� •.t' � ; •� ' � , t , � ' � ! i -�7
� . T -` '_'�-.- -r,t.—_'- •_!�_�.M` �'� �,'.,�..w.�� �.. 1 ' '
�' y .. � • ._.__° . _ :
II'� ;' f— .:. N .... �r. • `` � i �. , '; ; • : � ;
i� : . r ...... ,f y�.'� '� 1.
' '� ��� . lJt � . _ . C ' +:
� � `j.' � 'r-' `- - ',.....�` _' v � �� o t _ - I
� ; '> 81--�_ -�! ' �;J � j , '' '
N �. =q °, �,. !i �- 3 ,,, �-= = ; � 'Z' . ; � �
i �: , `' �, ' ;, .� ' / i k ,, f ,
• � 'L`-----=---_�. ! f � O � , R< i
� ; ' i � + ` ;•_ ;
' _ �j~ r ` .. � I i � � ( . J iie .. �tt � �
' ' �. , . ' ��: 4� • i I � . . . .. . 5..., .. ..... �3� i .
�• ` •� ' '. . I � � ' Sec 5 ' � . �
1^ �i �� _ ' -_ _ 1� .'r � - � .) i� � .. 7 � + �` '.
� � , �-�y . L:.
�, ; ,�' '....... � _.. .. _� �I .; _. L o ( i ,
• ' �, � - � , � - _ _�: _ �.- — - - --
/ '` __... i i `.�-,�' r, ! _ � � i .
, r ,y�. j , LO� �� i
, �-I ` ' �� _ ` , !_ i
...� � �i.... ' �.�� ':� '..•. .: -.�... "�..�...�....- _'�+"� . S�e.� Y• • ����' '� � �
�.-_.. �... � . .. � � ` _.�------ r _' �, 7171 — ` L.�..�.� ].�� h... t+ y
�
l MOO R E - a!?
\
�� LAKE �
�'"_-�---� ' __"�z. .:....,
u;�
4.bi
i2E
� ,,��;�,�,,�,,.
PLAT MAP
P . S . �� 93-02
Shorewood Plaza Revised
. ,
PRELIMINARY PLAT �
SHOREWOOD � PLAtA REVtSEO • .. � . ;
°�':�� °:�.�.a,...,,:�::� ��,::<.:�.��,�,� ,....��,....,....,�,�.�.. � ;
n.t �t ef w M�r� Wvur o( Matlan Il�. tu+.��t N. �, ���wo�. m.a�. - � nr+ 4��. r� 1ua y.�r ' .
�..t w.o.. u.N°a�� .a�w��u�ii e�iaw� in.r x�a�r e. ti.p• r •�•«y � ��. u.4�-� u�...� ..
�Y1r��YY�fA�
.wm:a. �••w ...�_.t�..aV.i948
,� ,�� �. .� �..,u �,�.�,�. Q G,�
,. .m ,: �, �. .m ,. .� � <,
a.,,,, �.. �.. ����----
,�, ,. .�. ,: �.�. .. .. .� o. .� �.. �.� ., �...n...,. _ �
.�. :, • `�..� �.�
F; ,�'"ne�.". ,�`ri"�..�°`.w` wn � �.iw� a��n .
�r�.i<. w.m� u w... m.a .iuw. ... as�
�i �u� «..�. .. �� w e.u�.r � w i.� x avnmo .w. ... m r.�...a
n�l��r ...�� r a.nw.a we roora �e. W� cl�ra u p`. �'. f. C:KE.4F 'I":.:lft4C.G:
•wr�1w eon. mr� r��. r� u a ��LLr�ua m u� l�rl �I�t. .
ll hcio�.! `w o<r�m� �mr.�u �narlrlwUw u e� N�YC M�w���w / ` .rtt•;�l . p�Ui\l ..-
^`t'!:.H�._:fM.1. .i�t I l Y �J
u� t e� nw r ���r r.��W. /[i..ir�'!'. }(l:: :..VL �l'�7N � � f 1�_
...�,. . . ��. ..,. �> �,,,,...,a.,. �. � / i —
...�� -r - �n mx .ia �a. ..��w .�wr. .�.�.r. .+ �.d.�. ..w.... -
�.�. n- - u �� .b ,o ��..e. w....�..... v.m.... �`/ ou�.:.o-r n /� /-� _ -
...�. v - �e �ex .e. �_ .n.aw �u..r. �r.r. .r �.a.ac...w.... . .
u....s •r - �f �ooi .w. e« luew eu.+r -�.teur www. 4tt7:tF:�:7 �:F:• 1� '.✓"� _
,� ...�,. � .....�, a�.,a. � .b. ��. ����..�.-. O UTLOT B�7 ....
,. ,w.�.. \ � v ••� � " .' �..-M � .�.�....,,
., �, �.,. _- � i w ...
�.I.. �H :.., r. x: �... �.:.:�.:: I / 4 Rp � ,.
� , � �' u�� \\ k.e � w�� �{
��`r�'��G./ \� /r �N� i
� '��r,� �;� OUTLOT A •� �� d' � �
� I
� �oT . / +i • / / o W �
�" • 9 r� F-
•Gi �
'� Mo .O � �'V�� � o:y �/ F� W
< r: '' � ` I
.NU O�E IqKE wES Uj OT C� •.,, ��,� � I�`� ��� J �
Yt��11
L�r � T RerA� — �/ ��' / x. LOT 3� a =,
_ � ` \4'"�� �^..., , B��CK s cENTeR ��= j� 1 �v , �'f . // �„ BLOCK 2 �
� ``� ' � j� � � / '� x I
; , , � �, a� � , � /�.
Q � b � � ,�� �' � �:/� . < '
3 �� , o o : � /� . �� �;
� �I ! � "s� / �i` � �.
• I v
r �i r p�
_ � ; � ' It : , ,� � � MOORE LAKE EAST
! � f
s � 't � �� r
.� = a �. . � � �4
Y S ���,,��' i ; — —�.— — — — —
Z �: . � .�
. ,
� EAST OORE 1 � "�, K -'� - :� � r �`i ) . I� ul
r A l . ���J
� - -- � i
' ..e: i . ui:�:.r. i. ... � __�ii.�� �yT S= � / • ! !I, �
•�Hr.:�.f:wren • a<q � G i
� LOT 1. BLOCK �` n .--�"�'-�•- �
W C ' ;. � �r
' _ �• <
� o, "(� . � \ 3•I��f� �MOORE LAKE RAGQUET
Q __ 1 }� U� I .� '. �J
�S'�
h ' ' �AR> >; , �� . I �WIM � 4!l�LTN CLUB � '
�� SURPLU> j I �� Y' � � / O 3
v � RETAIL °' t ' �' � ' I
I�' cenTert � ° � l o ' O� �. LOT 2''' Q i
i 1 � �� '
lW ! j' y I..v' lf/ / �.p�K3� � 'I ��. BLOCK 2 F�-
L �r' �� � �Y'��,�,p� ' ` I � � � . . z �
.��• �� � � I �^'f 2 U .
1'Nh�/ I' I�' �/� O I �� � ./ � ��—.
' ' pi '— ; wV��M�.
.. I ..c�6 I,, •=•�� "1• ..�„ �lr.
l::' .�.. I � 4..�.. ... L r? \ \ _ _ = w���+an� •t� .
;.�;:rcoxs � a.r.•.a 'i:f'Y ) ' ] U �/ �
baen;:;5.��a I � / / ��--`7-j"-� ' F 4:Y . 1
�vcY �
ra. va I .._�.. ...,_ � �f�vc i � �-� ..� �� . :.�vrrok� _�1
.-. .:._. .;' �/�°�� cv �c .s� � �
� I - -'�v p"/ r .. � I .�w . �a ca.wr uan __ '�••%�[!`��ra�� — .
0 � Y'�� �� r .ku���L!::l �tl
S --` o rlPi� � /(1
� J /
I ,.`s^� �.. r I ! . 'I� '' .... ..
.
� "'
_ I ��_. �" _ ���_�� J ♦ �nnrtr �rMnaw� -i" • •
... .
. '_'_.:^� •" "—�' _� "' "_"'_�'��__ /
_� � `Q
- - - � ' '� l i h� d�i vidi -T�'onrevtS -- _��v�t-c
M�QRE LAKE
.
. � .R..n.,o � sc.�c w ::.` �.
•u.0 , � �wc.� . w c
� -.- � W�ITMtY w ,l �
_. _. o�� ..�.:..�..�. - . 1
� —.—. W tw�+�.�N
-- — � �Mwr4( \N4 Ni�V\�Y 4%W.wT Y1N� I
--"— � �I�G1/�l Y�a M�aMWI Mra
• FJiNTO� AO)AL4lY �O ce�L. WM '
/ H . nwa w.o.a�+.� _ I
�12F � �,
� ` �
1 :�` _ ==� OUT�OT A D
_ , ;. _
I _ „ <. `. r�. ' .
. � `` �J
' � ' � P.S. ��934,d2 �t �
��_ - / Shore,wfob�i P ised
�_ � J � �S,
.. � . ,;
• � .t1 n �+. �D
i �L�l>;.
r.. � _� .
. � `� � �
l- � ' �_ Y � Q
.. �'. �- `i / = J C
r _ � ` " -
' O ` , .. _ ,✓, � D� .
v�` _ �a"' ` �
L ���i� rt � /
. � � � �' � . �''' '�
� � ��� 'r
�'f / �
� `l� � 1
^ ' .. " ��_ � . {�— ��` O � .
� <
I` ��• ,O„// �' � ' .9
�7 ' \ /
CS ��- �'
�N �J
� � � --� U �Q� � �{J � lr �
,, E �/ J o a K
K R � :.
4 ;: - �, � �/ 5
S� l { l'T �
l � /� f �V �� ` �
g r 1 e%' ,�D 8 c.�P
; �r � , v �
I _. .. ._., f / �l � � `�N r, / • �
� �� d � � � �
1 / - / .. �,� 5
1 ,�/ _ ? �, � � � r ` � ,a, .
� �:, r 1 .� D ^� - a / �p•/
I �� �; � '4- ' ` � : � • =l �� e �v
�
� �', ! ', � � /`� �/
, - i �(. �
� =� O �'���9r � � :
�
�
�a � ='' i / � / J
v O ( `y `r l
� i � ��
�� ` •'' .
5� � J D
� �- �� r , �. ' ._` �
� ,a,�a�r � M0
' �' c= ��! � � a
C� � �- � _
� D J
l��-'r Q' ` '
v ,Q :� - -
o , �, �� � �
,� � ,
- , P-C�i �Fi % \� '^IO
_ �a�� �� �! \
- - - � � o ��,� / �p � s i.
.�o pQ �� / V �
O
Q�
� £��s-�\�� _Q/ n� ��e' � � C- — -
� , 0 v`^ (% � P
� � /� � n//� � N
� �`L G ;,. .� �1' ? cv 1
_� AY``i y\a� `/ �o P v no -
-C� � Q4 N � �
�' �� ���
�A`���'i n -; y --
�
�'UT'1L.1T�( ,�- � ,� 5 e
0
.-. .r ��Q,� . , J M : .. . . _ - . . � . . . _ . L ` y
, � i.
��' ^'_�' p � 4 -, o i i
, ' •o
� G.A 5C M EK'�'
VT \1,1T1' �., % `-'ti, �
.� •��_ �,o� . �
�
'° '° r�: Curvature Correction
`1 � 12G
„
„
' ° � , � '
� � � /�� %�S� � � �
� �.
-''`- ,��` • .
. �
. � �� ;- i�-` �`;
•- �' ., . , _
D
I * ��
r2, �
/_/L v
��-T
' � "% ` �
Ir�.:__r=�� D
��3/�
��I /'/►./P
t%
J
P.S. ��93-02
I�uxly L. Kurth, Surveyor Shorewood Plaza Revised
hlinnesota Registration No. 20270
Kurth Surveying, Inc.
4002 Jefferson St. N.E.
Columbi.a Heig�ts, Minnesota 55421
(612) 788-9769 Fax (612) 788-7602
� rJ�. - _� '_-�,�_+,'It �`•
. �' �• L
I
-•-.-- �� � , • ,--
i �Y .Y�J-'���1__
�, � � ; y�l � ' i.r- '�_ �.�'.. !' `. :
� �- ' - -
� S � •
' ` , � ' • � I •
.�
/ +' � r—
' •
//
� _
q
i
» ''`O�OGO Q��f G����M �1ST11.1T.�o � EA15EMEPlY ``pn
O� ��V
��� .
, � QY�� _ a �
� p'�
J� 1� � %y�
S�P �`.Y // �
% `�
� N
J
� /
¢
v
G �
i �a
. ��,�s,
.:.
.�_ _
�
��
/
gv�, �o�� ��wcR)
'va � n
/ �� v
�`1
,�, `QR-
S;'
^v',
��
.
t
.;.,
� - .}
D ��.
,,
�I � • rJ
�
° ,Q . x.. -�1
i _ ��,,d r`,,
� / D �1'.
// !, 1
Q ��.
� ! -, � (l y `�.
�/ �r � i�
r n n D � `
c . _ v '.7
�
I'' '�/
I"1' � �/
,o � � ,�` _
�' / �
� t�
D d j;
V� ,��
.,;
�( y - 1
i�s_�� _
LOT 3 ,
BLOCK 2
12H
uT��.��K ESM'T
'-4
o R
�
�
�
z
�
�
�
J r
� �
� 3
D '�
�
i
�
�
�
�
o�
�
d
O. J
�
N
, �
y '
�
J O
� �
Q
�-
W Curvature Correction
� � � � ,
ii
I�
i�
PRELIMINARY PLAT
��R,a w �
SHOREWOOD � PLAZA REVISED
.,� �.,�, °:; ��.:: d �.� �;r °..:R�.°��: °
'�.�:.:: �..,..., .K„� ,,. �. b...�,. �...�. o�.....
�`�„°o�m.� x imu uu x� ��im �oo�na. mru.ni .a ....«y a
�..a �m. w�.. ...c«� w�. �ia..r e. ��.
aa.o: c....�.. .......�. ....w
iu...�...�o.�. rr.�w�ua�n., i2.
� �. �wa a: a�. .m >. w ox� ci
o+��a ae.u. w.
1� l. �an I: au�lat 4�. ti o. w nqa.a au[laa �I
nx.�m! 14w Iuutvn�� .��f ��1au< �. �
( (�1�rI'��1tw.��J+ �ian �1 �
C'sr�e b.a �Jl� u w. 1M ��i.R n. t!1
ii �ui w�... w. w ma�r ae u. v�u a�wwm w.... w r.�wa
w tl�r rra r,�`wa eme�a n. Il Ml u M Wa e1.��a b .
•ws�lw e+�r.. d�aw�r s u� (wl at�t.
u �,,.. «...��..b.4.w �..�« <..�w�m v a e..e.a a ..w�«. - / �;.i. ,.
ua4ahwq.huaLUW. . ..H�::tY. {.
u.�u ��• - f Imc .is IQ lucw. ��ew+li pqe..a. / ['•:)t��`• 30.•v :�.UL+1l'1�]N
�..�. -.• . ie �� .w. �« ..�.w ew... �u,..r. .a i.+�,s. r�.00.... /
�.....na �c - u �ma .na n �ex .a. v�r �e w� wvw+. �� C�:J'� :.C.'1' p
yrnt'Y - 1a (mi.ls IQ rL�tw bW+�. wlwl. ha 1�Wr P�P+�
�.�.. -r - �� �.o..e. �� �. u.... -..w. a..o.... ��uo:se:v+:aon . . .. �7f�
,� .,.d..,. � � �.�. a,�.�. ,� .�. � .�.«..�.�.... �
OUTIOT� B�/
,� �, , +� ... r �.� ..- �. �.,a.. � v � �
r finc.or.x: I ` �.T�.::I �� 4yRD
ual I .... n .., ., p�i:�. \ k.F • �
P.S. �693-02
Shorewood Plaza Revised �
.. . ,
,_..�u,..�........,�w_T.. �
w �i� r e.~�.�r �r �"R .
r... s..rw�..�. ..
s.� �w.e V. �94! �
�T�L.P�
w.�.• �...i.. aw
i�u 1�wIY. 4
�^'�.. ��•�iu��
wu +-.w o. wu ur�nu
1` ` W h`. Kv:F. C.KF.�jh t':.:tHM.G: .
n�crtx � —�
��. t •� � � '
// _�__ '
/:�� -- �,.,. 1
r: r � �..r,
� . n,,.«-�, w
r' / � �
° / ` .:,"�'./ �r � �.� OUTLOT A\� •� �� `na' ` �
. ��� a
j / �?' � j ' �
}i `'* 1 '�C•VI'':. . ry� / yO . }"
} l.:T.:.IY / 0..`� , � ' Z
� �
Mop .OV �.; ;1' W
� , Rg �Ke T��T C� � �.,.,. ,;� / + . f� ,i J
Lp wESr ._ ti �.' . � ^�� �
0
z
a
i
�7
S
Y
�
7
�
f- j
� �e
r /a
Q
F- �
'� ' i
u�
Ic
' u;
�
�,���T\y� T � • B�OCK �� CENtER
�
,� • ,
_\ ��,
f
�
EAST�—� MppRE "K
f , �..�.. .-- � �. P
�-oT � . ui:�:.r-�--
• a�;c•�.�.wcen F'1.F'l.q
LOT 1, BLOCK 1
SE.ARS
suaPwe
Re7At t.
cen�eR �;
,i
,
I' �
I.
L::" �tii I �'r.:.� � :.
:+'.1�1-!(1�t`i a�..�1`.'::i`F.J
b_an::ts...�. I �.�.. ...r..vcv'
r.�. sa
� '. '
I
--� ---
.� � ,t, . � � .�� OT 3 , J
��: f' � �� � I� � �� ,��i BLOCK 2 �
� �� �
' t� �� • ���
� '� " J ° / .,
/ O A.� j� /. `�
Oy.
V �.,��'_. / � �(�\
l� O
�� � MOORE LAKE EAST
�r�.Lf
--�'—
r'_
i
Jji �� � � , ��
�:� (.T� � ✓'�` %
� �S � '�. �I
� V �� �D�V�0.��� �
.r•. / �o.� � ' � I ; �
��� � � ; .
I '/ fF _� �
���'���J•O` / � '1 .
,—'� 'a„ ) y, ,� �s.
� / / j `v ,,. � r� —
�`� ���
, ��
- -_--- _=.�
MOORE LAKE
� ,
��
: <
�
'MOORE LAKE RAGQUET
bWIM � HCALTH CLUB
?
3 .
a'
=' LOT 2 �,A
���,BLOCK 2
�� �_� . .
._v �;_��.�--._._
� I I
F i.:: r , I
`' �_ui•ra:�.�.
.a«.u. w.. .e...` -- �sc�����c,�� --�
'7
I .I:UN;S'::l btl /
- � /
-- ---- f
- w r r �r
61l^MK �KI.LL ql iltT
wu � I IMCM • �O �t(T
—.— . wu��wv .aw�.n
—. —. noww ..w.w � o�wac��oy -
-.- . YMT6R MI4�1 •
�� � � �Mw�i( �/M YT�VITY 4.4LHCMT l,M�.
---' �t�c.�u. Wa Mti�M�MI uua
r� � KwGMTM AOlqGW� �O twL. CUM
H . r/wa wvow�.�.�
�I
o,
z�
=I
<'
� I�l
�
'W I
7
, Z �
W II �
Q
K
�•;
z
� ( �
� . �
' 12�Bikeway/Walkway Easements
P.S. ��93-02
Shorewood Plaza Revised
. �
PRELIMINARY PLAT .
SHOREWOOD � PLAZA REVISED � .. ' . �.
���,a a � . .
W l. �la1t 1: bt 1. �laA I: lu 1 tl l. �Idi L s0 At W 4�. C. sG �. W u . .
ur O�M �peuOC ��mu CaRf. �ITrM�. �Y Iwtrwld�G vssY� W ���M �I Ya �Y ��( M� � T� � �
t Owur N Malm �1. MW� M. YiP N. Mo�� 6iwl. �T� M��.i+� � Y�a Y'�Y�
Iww�x�. I�W oM�tll N W01� 4N Y�Y{�iM lY YWtPoI�. oY�l! ��wll N �1 �� W y�rr lw V�
�ri win� IY� Ptlw a� rt�1i M MM� 1[u► WY�� �. �f. � L r W�r r�� •.
.m:a•••••••�••+•�•�w w,tw.� 9.R9i �
�..a..�.. ��,..���,�.. ,�. �� �r,.�
.�.,..�,: �,..��....a..��,
�„�.�.w.
,�,..�,: �.�.. �.,........�..��., .._...�._�.
�w �YU �M�tq(�fa�pNa�CLLtlr< �..�1�n W� 4.
�^w'�'�..-CM"'^�"��.+.wH � fJr�w����� bT
�w:.�e �c1°•s riwa u w. m.a uwrt w. �u uw �ar w. wn s�u
�i �i .....�....�..a m�.ea s u. rw o� wmo� ruu .. u r..u.a � .
w w IIb �r wcutl �omrt r. uAn u r W� c1.�r u K,�.� C:KK�K '1'2AHPGi:
�w��lw aw� rru� v �W Wtti a �b 11W �Mt. .
ll /n�we �w .t .rru� won .IY Wt�r arlo�lm� m N�re�G nf w✓w . / . fy \ W F b1� �l 1,. J'1' M
m<4�MhN1wY�w�YUW. l:�T(..b�.::CM.I. :+�( �� �----_�
[+.:iN'!'. SK'v:nVL•��'��N
W�a •�• - f Iae[ Nb fa tuu�� �Wr1Y PVdd. / //—•
Wrn T- t0 tmt �W /> W�llq 11YrI. �IWI. s� IMCi� M04+� � �
Wra Y- Y Ima s0 i Ims �Ib Mwr W�sr I�F��. �`/ [1J'.'LSiI' b
�r�w Y- f0 Imt .W �ar wl�tb V WI. W�rt. d INS4 NP�. /' ��fu�• MMwY1� •
Wra T- lf Ima �16 Ix N[w �1w1 -��`V YP��. "i1!'JiLk:YYJU� {�l.i�'! � 1
�� r.m�. e..y u.�a a�.m. e. w w.ww w.w.... \ O UTLOT B ' J+• �'
.• �, '"^
.� u�. .. o—r . m.,�.. � � VR / • , ,,,u.p s w
�ino�,a.x: I 4..:.:ce:) \ 4y o� / • r
�„I I .,., � ..} , `'/�••: . ��e.E •'r• V
a / ` . c..l � / N s
� � � � OUTLOT A .� � �
3 ;;���-K � ��� a I
! ` / `�T a •:C� �,� �d� p �,�, � .
� ��r��� / ot� / ' y Z
N � M�aRE �VT� �'* da ��^/ ' s��. v �! I
,o : lqy�e OT C} I � �� �/� .
�.�.�r COT � EST RErAI •�/ ��' .c�' LOT 3. J Z�
p ` ., " 4 e�OCK ��Nt�R v.. ! f• /��= BIOCK 2 F I
7 '"�.+. �^ " . •
'e. } °' `� j� � 2
r� 4�i
r g Qa ` < �
4 � '� U;� � . �v �If
si ' �'` s• ��� � I.
J� ir L � 0�
2 ' d � �4/ MOORE LAKE EAST
t
S � o� '' 2 � I.
� --- -----. _ ...�+'" /
� EAST ----- I�
� MOORE I � �,pKt y�
J- ../f �.�.V w...w. . — I S 7
��---- �' y Z i
'1 �_-•- — ..� , t
�.�, ,. �,:;<.K �.... ., . ' 1 li W
� �.waco r�.:.zn 4 _. � .
� �. � LOT 1, BIOCK 1 - -—
W� � i� MOORE LAKE RAGQUET
r r ;p �� I •z i
Q o , � :
�' �
r � � �ARS }' , bW1M � �EALTN CLUB '
✓1 I � �I O O
34RPLUO ; I. ;
V RlTAIL ` 1 SY� � '? •
'� l ceKTatt r � � o,j, O, � LOT 2': d I i
Ir ' ,i K 3 ' ,'' tL
.�; , ! ,. ..v' r �-�� a °I �' BLOCK 2 F• i
�• �. �� �.k' � � , � � � . .. Z '
c: /; . O � I � r• �1 �
a, O I �
I rMh�/ �I .O ». i .�
t:; . �.. I TY.:, r .. F % � �num..�aw.« r7, `W �� � �-�•_ I.
:.J31TON.`� I ..1� �y � �
`iSEn�'f:`...:Il '::Yi'.JC\' s I ` f L•^.T �i I �
1:.). 9d I '�.. �__ � J � / .j �� . :.iL�ITOK'.. —� .
I.... .. _ / 1 �r.R �a.y�a �ww� wui. _ _ '�"b..SL`L�r��� _
I �� i • Q . kU,NiSt:A etl / .
J
1 �•
. .. ... .
I ] - .
'_'_:.:^--__ '. ' � l v.am waw..rt -c'
..• '_.�' "' "'�'___..�-.
__ -' i-�� a�� ��\`� -- __ �_� .
` .
MOORE LAKE ' •
» Y Y 'P `T
WYMK '/G�Lt W GCtT
� �cwu � � wc.. . w .ac�
—.— . vw���wv .awaw "
_. _...a„� ...�.a..�t,� _ . 1
. —.— . w.�ew rr�.�
���� NNw.�I �/M YT�� ITY MttNLNr 1J1K
--- � NK1AY Y�l M�IMWi llwl I
•►.werte� w0)/.tw� ro cw�G. WM i
�t 2J � . .,.. �.o.�.r
� ' Water/Sewer/Drainage Easements
CITY OF FRIDLEY p
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
(612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLAT APPLICATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached
Address:
Property Identification Number (PIN)
Legal description:
Lot Block TracdAddition
Current zoning: � -�� Square footage/acreage
Reason for plat:
Have you operated a business in a ciry which required a business license?
Yes No _�_ If yes, which city?
If yes, what type of business?
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing}
NAME
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
PETITIONER INFORMATION
NAME _�
ADDRESS _
�---
SIGNATURE
DAYTIME PHONE
DATE
DAYTIME PHONE
DATE
Fee: $500.00 for 20 lots
Petmit P.S. # `�J --d Z
Application received by:
Scheduled Planning Commission date:
Scheduled City Council date:
$ 15.00 for each additional lot
Receipt #
12K
�
-
-
July 14,1993
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST. PAUL, MN 55110 612 490-2000 800 325-2055
ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION
RE: Fridley, Minnesota
Shorewood Replat
East Moore Lake Drive
SEH File No. 88057
Ms. Barbara Dacy, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Ms.15acy:
Thank you for sending a copy of the staff report and an agenda for the July 14th Planning
Commission meeting. Unfortunately, we didn't receive our rnpy until July 13th and we
cannot rearrange our schedules to be in attendance at the meeiing.
We have been concerned about the replatting since June 10, 1991, when we received a
mpy of City Attorney Newman's letter dated May 26,1989. This letter indicated that an
error was made when SEH originally designed the alignment of Rice Creek Road. As our
June 25, 1991, letter pointed out, we followed the original alignment in the redesign of
Rice Creed Road. When the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Section
would not accept that alignment, there were two alternates available to the City. One was
to request a variance from the design requirements, and the second to modify the
alignment to provide minimum curvature. The City, SEH and Suburban Engineering
agreed to modify the alignment and replat at a March 29, 1988, meeting, and until June
10,1991, we were under the impression that the replatting had been completed.
In addition to the replatting for the slight realignment of right-of-way to accommodate
the road, there are numerous other corrections being made by the replatting. The cost
allotment by Kurth Engineering in 1989 assigned a value of $600.00 to the road
realignment, approximately 10% of the entire amount of work to be done.
We are therefore somewhat concerned that the staff report indicates that the "request is in
order to correct errors which occurred during the design of East Moore Lake Drive:' In
reality, it is an accumulation of numerous problems and concerns relating to the plat
which can best be accomplished through a replatting process.
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN ST. CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADlSON, WI
12L
July 14,1993
Page 2
We support the replatting and, on june 25, 1991, provided a check to reflect the total
amount assigned to the realignment of Rice Creek Road, now known as East Moore Lake
Drive. We feel that our exposure to this rnncern was created by the failure of Suburban
Engineering to replat as agreed to in 1988. Recognizing the many pariies involved, the
amount of time which would be spent in researching why the replat was not done in 1988
and our commitment to service, we provided the $600.00 check.
We would request that your report to the City Council indicates that the replat is due to a
culmination of several factors, or include this letter and the attached letters and notes. We
believe they would help clarify the roles and responsibilities of the many parties involved
in the need to replat.
If you have any questions, or would like to discuss our concerns further, please feel free
to call me at 490-2045.
Sincerely,
�2�� UG�rI !.�/�
Glen Van Wormer
Manager
Transportation Department
GVW:kam
Enclosures
c: John Flora, Director of Public Works, City of Fridley
12M
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 14, 1993
_��_��_____�_____________________�__�_____________________��___,��
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Newman called the July 14, 1993, Pla ng Commission
meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present: Dave Newman, Dave ndrick, Dean Saba,
Diane Savage, B Sielaff, Connie Modig,
LeRoy Oquist
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Mic le McPherson, Planning Assistant
nt Fernelius, Housing Coordinator
George Applebaum, Shorewood Plaza Partners
Leonard Juster, rep. Northwest Racquet Club
MOTIO�y Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Mr. Saba, to approve the June
23, 93, Planning Commission minutes as written.
T�FON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NSWMAN DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT. P.S.
�93-02, BY THE CITY OF FRIDLEY:
To replat property described as Lot l, Block 1, Shorewood
Plaza, Lot 1, Block 2, Shorewood Plaza, Lots 1 and 2, Block
3, Shorewood Plaza, Outlots A, B, C, and D, Shorewood Plaza,
and that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township
30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southerly of
Moore Lake Highlands 3rd Addition, northerly and westerly of
Moore Lake Drive and easterly of State Trunk Highway 65. This
property is generally located at the intersection of Highway
65 and East Moore Lake Drive, between Highway 65 and Central
Avenue.
The subject parcels include the East and West Moore Lake
Shopping Centers, the Northwest Racquet, Swim & Health Club,
and Sears outlet.
The purpose of this plat is to correct errors from the
previous 1989 plat. No new development is proposed.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Modig, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
12N
pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JIILY 14 1993 PAGE 2
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE
�OTION CARRIED AND THE PQBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the Shorewood Plaza Replat is to revise the
Shorewood Plaza Plat which was approved by the City of Fridley in
1987. The properties involved are the old Shorewood Shopping
Center, the East Moore Lake Commons Shopping Center, the Sears
outlot building, the Moore Lake Racquet, Swim & Health Club, and
Outlot B which is at the intersection of East Moore Lake Drive and
63rd Avenue.
Ms. McPherson stated that during the replatting process, the City
was also in the process of redesigning and reconstructing East
Moore Lake Drive in order to accommodate the increased traf f ic from
the proposed development. The Minnesota State,.Ai.d Department
denied the City's original design; and after the plat was approved,
the City had to redesign the road to meet the Minnesota State Aid
Street (MSAS) Standards. As a result of the realignm�nt and the
redesign of the road, additional right-of-way was needed. The City
also has to return some right-of-way that had been dedicated. A
Surveyor's Certificate was recorded after the plat had been
recorded; however, this did not allow the City to record the
required bikeway/walkway, street, drainage, and utility easements
against the new plat. The original plat did not include the old
Shorewood Shopping Center; however, that property is included in
the revised plat request.
Ms. McPherson stated that as part of the revised shorewood Pla2a
Plat, several lots and blocks are being created by this plat
request, including a lot line which appears to split the Racquet
Club lot into portions. The purpose for the location of this lot
line is that the property changes from Torrens property to Abstract
property at that location, and separate lots must be created in
order to allow the recording of the appropriate property titles.
The lots as created do meet the minimum requirements of the C-3,
General Shopping Center District, regulations.
Ms. McPherson stated that due to the realignment of t�z roa�
design, additional right-of-way needs to be dedicated in order to
allow the street to exist within the appropriate right-of-way. The
following road curvatures must be corrected:
l. The north edge of East Moore Lake Drive in front of the
old shopping center.
2. The south edge of East Moore Lake Drive in front of East
Moore Lake Commons
Ms. McPherson stated the bikeway/walkways easements which need to
be recorded include easements for the existing bikeway/walkway
along the south edge of East Moore Lake Drive, as well as an
easement for future bikeway construction south along the service
120
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 14, 1993 PAGE 3
road adjacent to Sears Outlet and around the detention facilities
of the Moore Lake Racquet, Swim & Health Club.
Ms. McPherson stated there are street, drainage, and utility
easements which were unable to be recorded against the original
plat. The original Shorewood Plaza Plat had several dedicated
utility easements. However, the utilities as constructed for the
development do not fall within those originally dedicated
easements. The previously dedicated easements will need to be
vacated by a blanket vacation ordinance which will come before the
Planning Commission in August and will be recorded prior to the
City recording the revised plat. The easements depicted on the map
entitled "Water, Sewer, Drainage Easements" must be dedicated in
order to allow the City to access these utilities.
Ms. McPherson stated that as a side item to this plat request is
the proposed booster station that the City will construct as part
of the joint powers agreement with the City of New Brighton to
receive the water from the Twin City Army Ammunitions Plant. At
the time the staff report was written, staff anticipated that the
City would be acquiring the entire parcel and proposing a split.
The City will be acquiring the parcel; however, they will not be
pursuing a split of the property at this time.
Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the plat request, P.S. #93-02, by the City
of Fridley as proposed.
Mr. Kondrick asked if the City anticipates any costs to be borne
by property owners in the area other than the City of Fridley.
Ms. McPherson stated that while the City of Fridley is shepherding
this particular request through the process, it is somewhat of a
joint application in which the City has come to an agreement with
adjacent property owners to pay for the surveying costs. All the
legal and title fees will be the responsibility of the adjacent
property owners. The property owners are aware of this and are
willing to correct the legal land problems.
Mr. Leonard Juster stated a lot of errors were made when East Moore
Lake Drive was designed. This proposal by the City to clear up the
legal land problems is welcomed by the adjoining property owners,
and all the costs will be covered by the adjoining property owners.
Mr. George Applebaum stated he is in agreement with Mr. Juster's
statement.
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
12P
pLANNING COMMISSION M$ETING JIILY 14 1993 PAGE 4
MoTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to
City Council approval of Preliminary Plat, P.S. #93-02, by the City
of Fridley to replat property described as Lot 1, Block 1,
Shorewood Plaza, Lot 1, Block 2, Shorewood Plaza, Lots 1 and 2,
Block 3, Shorewood Plaza, Outlots A, B, C, and D, Shorewood Plaza,
and that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 30,
Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying southerly of Moore Lake
Highlands 3rd Addition, northerly and westerly of Moore Lake Drive
and easterly of State Trunk Highway 65. This property is generally
located at the intersection of Highway 65 and East Moore Lake
Drive, between Highway 65 and Central Avenue. The subject parcels
include the East and West Moore Lake Shopping Centers, the
Northwest Racquet, Swim & Health Club, and Sears Outlet.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY.
Chairperson Newman stated that the letter dated July 14, 1993, from
Glen Van Wormer, Manager, Transportation Department, for SEH,
should be included as part of the record.
2. RECEIVE JUNE 7 1993 PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive th��June
7, 1993, Parks & Recreation Commission minutes.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN CLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
3.
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Kond
22, 1993, Appeals Commission minutes. /
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE,
MOTION CAR�tIED IINANIMOIISLY. /
4. RECr:lVr; 1nt�Y 10,
COMMISSION MINUTES:
, to receive the June
NEWMAN DECLARED THE
MoTION by Mr. Sielaff, econded by Mr. Kondrick, to receive the May
18, 1993, Environmen� 1 Quality & Energy Commission minutes.
IIPON A VOICE V(
MOTION CARRIED
5.
ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE
JIMOUSLY.
19
MOTION y Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms_ Modig, to receive the June
3, 19 3, Human Resources Commission minutes.
A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE
�N CARRIED UNANIMOOSLY.
12Q
r �
�
I
Community Development Department
PLArrrr�rrG Drvisiorr
City of Fridley
DATE: September 9, 1993
TO: William Burns, City Manager
�.
�•
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SIIBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #93-18, by Mark and Laura
Ingebrigtsen, 5831 West Moore Lake Drive
The Appeals Commission reviewed the attached variance request at
its July 27, 1993, meeting. The request contains two variances:
1.
2.
To reduce the side yard setback for an attached accessory
structure from 5 feet to 2.3 feet
To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3
feet
The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the first part of the variance request. The Commission voted 2-1
to recommend approval of the second part of the variance request.
As there was one dissenting vote by the Appeals Commission, the
City Council is required to review the variance request.
MM:ls
M-93-483
'�
REQUEST
Permit Number
Applicant
Proposed
Request
Location
SITE DATA
Size
Density
Present Zoning
Present Land Use(s)
Adjacent
Zoning
Adjacent Land Use(s)
Utilities
Park Dedication
Watershed District
ANALYSIS
Financial lmplications
Conformance to the
Comprehensive Plan
Compatibility with Adjacent
Zoning and Uses
Environmental
Considerations
� RECOMMENDATION
Staff
Appeals Commission
Planning Commission
Author .�:y�
STAFF REPORT
Community Development Department
Appeals Commission Date July 27, 1993
Planning Commission Date
City Council Date : September 13, 1993
VAR #9 3-18
Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen
'Ib redua� the side yard setback for an attached acoessozy
structure frcHn 5 feet to 2.3 feet; and t-�o reduce the front
yard setb,adc frcm 35 feet to 31.3 feet
5831 West Moore Lake Drive
10,200 square feet
1�1, Single Family Dwelling
Residential
R-1, Single FaQnily Dwelling, to the N, 5, & W; Nbore Lake
totheE
Residential
�
Approval
,�
I�
VAR �f 9:3-125
Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen
�■
�
M��1
LI
13B ZONING MAP
!3, T. 30, R. 24
�
' FR/OL EY
�
12
cq
�
29
`i
tl
2f
2S
�
2i
:z
z/
VAR i�93-18
Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen
TNIS 15 A COMPIIATiON OF RECORDS AS
lHEY APPEAR IN iHE ANCKA COUNTY
OfFKES AFFECTING 7NE AREA SNOWN.
THIS DRAWING IS TO 6E USED ONLY FOR
REFFRENCE PURPOSES AND THE COUN-
7Y IS NOT RESPONSIBIE fOR ANY W-
ACCURACIES HERE/N GONTAlNED.
53923
❑�
�0
so; O� i �
r
; �, / 1
, r �
\ � /�p�'� , � 1 '�
� 3 /Z i
4 /
�i , I
b '
3 // �
N. E. — - .�
� j i o �/ 7 ��3� � / ..
2s L � . `3� � " / : f- : � 3e � :zas �'
19 Z � 2i L 2 L : 41 /, `, � .
sa �) . 2Q .y.3 iI �' t9 2 .n � Y
�13 D3
zv 'f zv s :� ' o z� �� z� � pa��
Y• 5 , 2G i! '� : ?G p f7) yi.
ZJ Q 25 �i 6 . 3 � Lf JS ��q s
23 f . 25 r L ZS ;), i F • iiJi •
tf 7 = W Zf ' 7 .(V ' 2f �• Z4 7 W ZE y ���
j3 Q / �
PL y Z ZZ� � . 2-. 13 9 - Z3 J � Q 13 d
2z . 2L y K p2 .] :
2 / ' /C Y / . A� z.• . . 1: /O . � 1. �a i �i
Ie� ,; 2�': i/ � 2oi ,� , 2o i: . � '� // , � � O`
!1 /2 . i9 /z ,�' iz i1j .z ,p� iz � , �. I
i! /� �. N �8 !3 _. �. iS /3 ii M �/3 fA 1' 1 O
' /1 :f t /7 /t i /7 /! � /7 i� '/7 /P � .
�. /6 / / /S /s �J � � .. .
�. /! /S ii /1 ` \ .
r--39-�i�F �V�E--N� �; . .;� . _.< ...a. ` .. « �
`n1jB � � M, c �'r�/2 %�> 3a-� i :�' , e)� s� �.• 3 i r� nJ c,• •
• Pf 2 4 2 I
���/7 ,Z '�f�, 2 , �J� p 7 � 'e�.�\
x%�7 z ae, e; o\ cra ''.�,~4 59TH AVE. N.E. � �;r,z
�''/6 Q� 3�+ O ��'�/f ,i y � � � . . , „ ; '
ac \ - '
� f� wn 41 ��`- I k. : r'l�: bI jr'� .(f: 3� c�
� �� 4 �!� _ /� f' n.� � � 2 s �C . � 9 '+.. 7. . • j 5 'i 'i 'i Z, . � . '�
' z� $ � - .... n) 1� •: i �...'� ,
!"' i4 s ��' e /.s yt' S L'! z3 0 , I t^" :. .
� : - ,,; 5 �
�M,�
�rl/3 6 l.r'� 3 ,�,i 1`� e�� L� J ei� . A)! ` tn ., ���8 � j� io �/i /Z ' 3 � `� 6 �'E, r s.
� `.i 9 �: � �
�z � ,r). iz �t' � � r,r� zo ; � �• �,y� � ,. „ , rW' .... � . � '' %'�� -
B �% � 3 ��,. � �' ` �z • y MARIGO D � TERRACE �,Q �d
��/ �/t ie i3 � � y)3 .. � , , , ,�,� � , !f i J + �i
� y U' � �6� �Y . /ar d ' `+. j«�... «�i sn rx�) �`) � An I �;a ' _ '',a �y''
�P/O /O'O�S i /L /J p . 4A; o� �l��l'�4 12 � /a f B �' .a'7 • .' /"' '
- �` .r . _ +� Z ` H' I � :. .... ..,, � «� : �� : 11 ` '\
` �) �' w� ♦ 5 . �/ : Z .
1;'9 T t;7is _ , j (� ,..y1 � ,.� � 7 �9 �++J � , . ;n i�l (J dnJ ?h� ��a• 3�- F ' r I r. �
�
� 2 , i3� � 2 9 � f �� /B i7 Zo 2/ 22 23 C� � ,• � i)' !n) l3 �C .
)/¢ 3W y�/2 ,. 3 t) . r� u ' a ZA +. .
y��ir f iir -°— io� •'t''� 58TH �AVENUE �� !`• zs.' ' •• �; '`k h \
iv1.� s(� �.�n i�e � 5 ��, � � . �t� �y, F� :,o «r W>> �ryF: ..`' Ca) �Y�n.,"`. zc � H�- Z , �;'. � '4 /f • \
9 b k.� -_G._�_ I. W..A` '� � - I' y�
;e ro)l ��- . •f, f 5 4 3 2 I Ns/ 2 3. �i . i7 �: ,j;
/s.: .i s 'd `. i4n� ziq�2.�a ��YJ 4, 4 � o , . �
�i, �� r: .i � z { r u; 'su w� an� �� A ;r, � 5 j! '. N. E. • = �e �� � �
� REp ERED ... : � /3o-� y c B f /O // �Z 73 `!4� j 2i 23 ' �J : '..�r�y� .'/ `� /',:'.
.e� " ` ;i;: --H"' a (a) y, w. a, n'� w � O ..i � •ag � -
�LANO SURVEY :• /2° S(�> � /i oZ .- " �� ^� .a� Y 22 �„�, F . "��f ���Z
%�'` '���° i�,00 s�.r , v�i • �HELENE PLACE ,., � N '. , 'b is:
� ��}i0. al9 '�� .7 . ;5 p •i a7 �� � 'V) i M' v ,I�\ �%��ey1- ~?%` �B„ ✓'3 `3 ��..:n/9': ... ...
. Y Q 9. 7 S 4 , N 4:
�„vso Bk _ i, ; S' ir•J ' 3 f 2 . Y n)ZO gx� " Y ��,�2 �`�t ^�2° z� n,�
. i.�w •. , ' � ... x
- . . ... - n n .v '. rs-. '
_" . . . .:. .,
� � "_'_'"' _' "' Q '_ , .
� , .i ^, ' _'' ""_ ' ry' ,..+"
'S
13
24
i
14 � �` �
ti�:.,:�
ROLAND W. ANDERSON � "' � '��
.n: �--:; �a
COUNiY SURYEYOR � w ����� �
AYOKA CdlMIY, AIYINFSOIA weYJ-)fI
. _ ..R,: _./.,�4� ,
13c LOCATION MAP
Staff Report
VAR #93-18, 5831 West Moore Lake Drive, Mark & Laura Ingebrigtsen
Page 1
A. STATED HARDSHIP:
"Garage side variance: Need room to put double garage in.
Garage front variance: Need room to put service door/entrance
into garage."
B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
Request
The petitioners request that two variances be granted:
1. To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to
31.3 feet
2. To reduce the side yard setback from 5 feet to 2.3
feet
The request is for Lot 8, Block l, Donnay's Lakeview Manor
Addition, generally located at 5831 West Moore Lake Drive.
Site
Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit with
a detached single car garage. The property is zoned R-1,
Single Family Dwelling, as are all adjacent properties. The
property is located on Moore Lake which abuts the subject
parcel to the east.
AnalYsis
Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(b) requires a side yard setback of
5 feet between an attached accessory building and a side
property line.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to provide space
between individual structures to reduce the possibility of
fire, to provide access to the rear yard for emergencies, and
to limit the condition of crowding in the residential
neighborhood.
The petitioners are proposing to remove the existing single
car garage and add on to the dwelling unit to the rear as well
as constructing a two-car attached garage. The existing
single car garage is currently located at the 2.3 foot setback
requested by the petitioners.
13D
Staff Report
VAR #93-18,
Page 2
3
5831 West Moore Lake Drive, Mark & Laura Ingebrigtsen
The City Code permits expansion of existing single car garages
to two car garages by allowing the reduction of the setback
to 3 feet if the house adjacent to the expansion is located
at least 10 feet from the lot line or a two car garage is
located at least 5 feet from the lot line. While this request
is slightly different, the impact to the code is the same.
section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code requires a
front yard setback of not less than 35 feet.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-
street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way
and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building
"line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard.
The petitioners are adding an additional 4 feet to the front
of the proposed garage. This will permit installation of a
service door in the garage. The service door is not required
by Code. The added 4 feet will not adversely impact sight
lines from adjacent properties. The overall lot coverage will
also not be affected by the proposed addition.
Should the Appeals Commission recommend approval of the
request, two stipulations should be conditions of approval:
1.
2.
The construction shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code.
The petitioners shall provide a hard surface driveway by
July 1, 1994.
Appeals Commission Action
The Appeals Commission voted 2-1 to deny the variance request
to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3 feet.
The Commission voted unanimously to approve the variance
request to reduce the side yard setback from 5 feet to 2.3
feet with the stipulations recommended by staff.
Staff Update
The petitioner requested information regarding 5741 and 5891
West Moore Lake Drive. The dwellings have similar
characteristics to the proposed remodeling. No information
regarding the front yard setbacks was available. Both garages
were built as attached prior to 1966.
13E
VAR 4t 9 3-18
Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen
\
/ � i
��
\
�
/ \
\
�
Ih�� /
/
/
\
� � NE�
� A�%� �-IDi,t
�
� �
�,��N� � ��
�_l.L� t`-�� � /
�
����
�
� � °� /
\ � . ���
�
� ���
, �
w��� �
�
�r� `�r:-, vG \ �
\ j
� /
V
13F
� a ,,`�;6z � � z
�
�°- � V 4� 3-18
? ark nd Laura In ebrigt
; , a-
- � �:!
--�
��i
�,
�' !j � ' — —
� i g3 '� ��� � �
,, �� �� �
lL � a,
O �� I JO ��
I
�W �21 I � � � ( -
t� , � v � � � �
?� z dn �� �� � ' ';
��� I 3 I 0 N
� �
�
:�' ; � �; � , �
" ��� •� r k
� ' � � `" I Ol
� ' ? � .
_ ` _ I � �� � J� � �
J �
�
i `
I w�
' � �
` ,
. I � �� c�.� — -� �-
�� r�� � � � �
v� '
L UJ J '�� : o� `� .
`� �^ � ,� ' � l„a�Ndd � w ` �L� � �
�,n ,�, a_�
,—� � d� _ _ N'�`° � . � z � �i � 1
, ��
�
o�
`," � z i I -�v �� � 91
Cti 3__ �� W �
� i �1 � --- . C�in `� �`-� I ' �..�^,
a �� ^ v � ,� � I\ d- ? �>>
� �; � �
— _ __'A I '� � 4U ; _ i ( � � � .
{ L' : � f
a u � � �. .
il: I � .. . . .. . . . . � v .
S ii i � .i �Ll'-'� r.' I A �- �
i� �' i 1' i�� %II _�\ . � �' t q
� ' ���--- N� .:;� \ s?��r�yo� �Si- �
VI
_ �. — ---
o i �' � ' " — — -
I a � � i o-� - ,
J , I OS
� t -- � � �
_ � ?- � .
;� �
` , � I
�i' J
' � ^ ,;t
- � - ''�' � �
�--- -- — — — - ------- p
+'4��"!'`�J' i r�� ' �V .
� I�� ; ; �
i , ��
� -- J ��W
��] .l;l!i �.��:�r!'�JIV� q/ Z ••
f Q
��
�
-- � � �, � � '
� � � �
� �, � ��
_. �, �
` � ;I �� � , }� �i I �-
, 1 =� --� -i-.
_ � �� �--_ � L r
• J j c. � i
'� � � 3
z. c+
- � -- J
� :��,�� - 13G °�7 -�- �
� �
>Q
u
�
,
Z
�
�
�
8
.
�
!
;}
:; ^
. • �_, .:
,�iJ '
Z
0
4c
�
`�
Z
�
�
�
�
0
�
w
�
.i
, . il - .
i. '
13H
��
Mar
� �(I�
_.
=
� ��
�"� ��
I�I
�
iiiu
,� .
�is-
�n La,�ura Ingebr
;"
.
/
�
�
:
`,
� '
.\
J ' ��
�
I; � i `� O
S t ''
, � ! ' � �
' ��
, � ' `d-
i -
�� 1 2
�
t=-
,_ >
,�
J
W
H
z
. �
, �l-
�'
n
� o�
� ��
� �
�
z
:� ��
�> >
,_
��
T U
• ;_[
� C�
�
�
gts�
�
�t
_�
�
.�`
Z
_J
tU
:l
�,
�:_
u,
� �.
.�
�
C:
�'
�� Q
��'
c
�
r
�-1 J
J �Q.
� �
N p.
\
�
0
_ / t'-�
,' / •
,�
�
�
�, -- --
\\ �
"� I�I
131
��
\�
i
z
O
1--
�
�
11.]
uJ
1�
�
�
�Q,
J
VAR ��93-18
Mark and Laura Ingebrigtsen
CITY OF FRIDLEY
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
'�
��•�
(612) 571-3450 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
VARIANCE APPLICATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION - site plan required for submittal; see attached
Address: 5�� 3% L�>- i%%vv r� 1 cc �-e- �r �r'� �ll� �/ /��i 7 SS'1�.jZ
Property Identification Number (PIN) � � ' �U ` � `� ' / y - � ° � �
Legal description: 5� E �-T t"�t �%� Ef� CC; �i c�F C�� TiFC.� 7� c� �%/ TL�
Lot t`� Block / Tract/Addition ��nn Q y's L.�t i�e�•; r--� Nl qnor-- �ecic��
Current zoning: �e s,���,f'u � SquareJfootagelacreage �'� 1�1�1�
' �Yf'. �A iQ//C.e: zec� !'c:�.;� c. Pv cv �
Grir4 � ,5� r
Reason for variance and hardshin:c.,.v�� `.Y,,� v�„-, 4.�.� � Nee�,l rora, f�� ,�?�� .se�v�c� �.1,�r,
Section of City Code:
Have you operated a business in a city which required a business license?
Yes No .�_ If yes, which city?
If yes, what type of business?
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No _„�_
,•�rv y
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title)
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing)
NAME ..�.� � L<< vr-Ct �.� - E? br.���S
ADDRESS S�' ��. � vor Lct�� /' �, �� �� n S S�F,3�.
DA M HONE 3 7:y- !3 G d
SIGNATURE .D�E " .3
� ��
PETITIONER INFORMATION
NAME
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
YTIME PHONE
DATE
Fee: $100.00 $ 60.00 for residential properties
Permit VAR #_ ��--�$ Re ipt #� �°l�
Application received by:
Scheduled Appeals Commission date:
Scheduled City Council date:
13J
IGt�
0
:�. It���c
0
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 27, 1993 PAG$ 7
Ms. Savage stated she agree . Moving the garage would not impact
the adjacent neighbors. Th garage to the west appears to be at
the same 17.5 foot setback. She stated she would be in favor of
approving the variance.
Ms. Beaulieu stated that s ce most of the garages in the
neighborhood appear to be at he same setback, she could see no
reason not to approve this vari nce.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by s. Beaulieu, to approve variance
request, VAR #93-17, by Vern a d Deloris Bandel, per Section
205.07.03.D.2.(c).((3)) of the Fr'dley Zoning Code, to reduce the
setback of an accessory structure facing the side street from 25
feet to 17.5 feet, to allow the r ocation of an existing garage
in the rear yard, located on Lot 1 Block 4, Bonny Addition, the
same being 5980 - 6th Street N.E., wi h the following stipulations:
l. The petitioner shall provic�e a hard surface driveway by
July 1, 1994. �
2. The petitioner shail replace� the existing curb cut and
remove the existing driveway.\
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE�
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
SAVAGE DECLARED THE
4. CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE RE4UEST, VAR #93-18, BY MARK AND
LAURA INGEBRIGTSEN:
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(i) of the Fridley Zoning Code, to
reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3 feet;
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:05 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the property is located on West Moore Lake
Drive and abuts Moore Lake on the northeast. The property is zoned
R-1, SingZe Family Dwelling, as are all adjacent properties.
Ms. McPherson stated that located on the property is a single
family dwelling as well as a detached single car garage. The
existing garage is located at the 2.3 side yard setback. The
petitioners are proposing an extensive addition to the existing
single family dwelling. The petitioners are proposing to remove
the existing garage and construct a new two-car garage attached to
the dwelling unit, as well as a storage area to the rear of the
garage.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners are requesting a reduction in
the front yard setback in order to provide room to install a
required service entry door into the garage. They are also
13K
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JOLY 27, 1993 _ PAGE 8
requesting a reduction in the side yard setback. Typically, the
Code allows existing single car garages to be expanded to within
3 feet of the lot line if the house adjacent to the expansion is
at the 10 foot setback or the adjacent garage is at the 5. foot
setback. While the existing single car garage is not originally
attached to the dwelling unit, in spirit this is a very similar
request in the fact that it would be attached and would be a two-
car garage.
Ms. McPherson stated the existing single car garage does not appear
to have an adverse impact on the property to the south. The
dwelling unit to the south is located 13 feet from the lot line;
therefore, the setback between structures is actually greater than
what is intended by the Code. The encroachment on the front wauld
not adversely impact the adjacent property or any sight lines. The
proposed additions to the garage and to the dwelling unit do not
adversely impact the maximum lot coverage.
Ms. McPherson stated that if the Commission approves this request,
staff recommends the following two stipulations:
1. The construction shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code.
2. The petitioners shall provide a hard surface driveway by
July l, 1994.
Dr. Vos asked if the garage service door can be in any location of
the garage.
Ms. McPherson stated that is her understanding. There is not much
room for a service door on the south side of the garage; and due
to the closeness of the garage to the lot line, no openings would
be permitted in a fire-rated wall.
Mr. Mark Ingebrigtsen stated that the houses in this area were
built too far to one side of the lots, so this is not unique to his
lot. He stated the neighbor to the south has no objection to the
new garage cont.inuing to be at the 2.3 foot setback.
Dr. Vos stated he has no objection to the side yard setback, as the
2.3 feet is existing. However, he does object to the encroachment
into the front yard. He stated that in order to grant a variance,
there must be a hardship; and if there is the possibility to place
the service door in the rear of the garage, then there is no
hardship for the sexvice door in the front.
Mr. Ingebrigtsen stated that because the house was placed to far
to the south on the lot, there is not enough room to have a double
garage door and a service door facing the street. The purpose for
the service door in the front as proposed is that they do not want
all the traffic entering and exiting the front door to the dwelling
unit. He stated there is a house to the north of them that has a
service door in the front similar to what they are proposing.
13L
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JIILY 27, 1993 PAGB 9
Ms. McPherson stated she would have to verify the exact Building
Code requirement with the Chief Building Official. She stated
there is no code requirement dictating that the service door has
to be in the front.
Ms. Jeanne Ingebrigtsen, 5811 West Moore Lake Drive, stated that
if the service door is placed in the rear of the garage, it would
be difficult to get in and out of during the winter because it is
a walkout. How are the children going to get to the service door
during the winter with the snow and the sloping hill in the rear
yard? There is only 2.3 feet to the lot line on one side of the
house by the garage and 16 feet to the lot line on the opposite
side of the house.
Dr. Vos stated he can understand what the petitioners are saying,
but that does not constitute a hardship. He stated his service
door is in the rear of the garage; and because of a burglary, he
has not opened it in 15 years. There are other ways to get into
the garage besides the service door and that is through the garage
door itself. He would vote in favor of the side yard variance but
would vote against the front yard variance, because he did not see
a need for it.
MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOII3LY AND THE PIIBLIC SEARING CLOSED AT 8:30
P.M.
Ms. Savage stated she did not have a problem with the front yard
variance. She believed the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3
feet is still within the spirit of the code as it does- not
adversely impact any neighboring sight lines.
Ms. Beaulieu stated she would agree with Dr. Vos. She also did not
object to the side yard variance to 2.3 feet, but she did not see
a hardship for the front yard variance if, in fact, the service
door can be placed in the rear of the garage. She, too, doss not
use her service door anymore after a burglary.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend to City
Council denial of variance request, VAR #93-18, by Mark and Laura
Ingebrigtsen, per Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley Zoning
Code, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 31.3 feet;
to allow the construction of a double car garage on Lot 8, Block
l, Donnay's Lakeview Manor Addition, the same being 5831 West Moore
Lake Drive N.E.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, VOS AND BEAIILIEO VOTING AYE, SAVAGE VOTING NAY,
CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED BY A VOTE OF 2-1.
13M
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. JULY 27, 1993 PAGE 10
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to recommend to City
Councii approval of variance request, VAR #93-18, by Mark and Laura
Ingebrigtsen, per Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(b) of the Fridley Zoning
Code, to reduce the side yard setback from 5 feet to 2.3 feet, to
allow the construction of a double car garage on Lot 8, Block 1,
Donnay's Lakeview Manor Addition, the same being 5831 West Moore
Lake Drive N.E.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED THE
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to City Council on August
16, 1993. She stated that before the Council meeting, she will
check on the service door requirement and the location of the
service door and research the location of the house with a similar
garage and service door as mentioned by the petitioners.
5. UPDATE ON PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL ACTIONS:
Ms. McPherson gave an update on past Planning Commission and City
Council items.
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to adjourn the
meeting. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Chairperson Savage
declared the motion carried and the July 27, 1993, Appeals
Commission meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
Res ectfully S bmitted,
Ly e Saba
Recording Secretary
13N
�,
� _
�
J
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
September 9, 1993
William Burns, City Manager
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Variance Request, VAR #93-22, by Mark Blegen,
275 Ironton Street N.E.
The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recoYnmend that the City
Council deny the variance request. The petitianer is requesting
a three-part variance:
1.
2.
3.
To reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet
To reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet
To allow reconstruction of a nonconforming use that is
damaged to more than 500 of its fair market value
The Commission directed the petitioner to review the site and
determine if it is possible to relocate the dwelling to meet the
setback requirements. The Commission recognized the existence of
the creek running through the property and acknowledged that some
type of variance request may be required by the petitioner.
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals
Commission action.
MM:ls
M-93-518
14
�
� �'�
0
ST.�� �o � T �
� Community Development Department
Appeals Commission Date �lugust 31, 1993
Planning Commission Date
City Council Date Septeniber 13, 1993
REQUEST
Permit Number
Applicant
Proposed
Request
Location I
SITE DATA I
Size
Densiry ,
Present Zoning �
Present Land Use(s)
Adjacent
Zoning
Adjacent Land Use(s)
Utilities
Park Dedication
Watershed District
ANALYSIS
Financial lmpiications
Conformance to the
Comprehensive Pfan
Compatibility with Adjacent
Zoning and Uses
Environmental
! Considerations
RECOMMENDATION
Staff
Appeals Commission
Planning Commission
Atithor �.yS
VAR #93-22
Mark Blegen
To reduce the fn�nt yard setbadc fran 35 feet to 8.2 feet;
to reduoe.the side yard setback frcxn i0 feet to 9.8 feet
275 Ironton Street N.E.
24,431.25 square feet
�l, Single Family Dwelling
Residential
P 1, Single Family Dwelling, on all sides
Six Cities
Denial
I7enial
`v�.h � �v�v nnHr
��
�
,
1
`
,
❑/
l9
���
� �,�
� " �
�:..,.� QI
.
-�:
: �
,
� ..:, �
..., �
9- !;}•�;.
ii��/►i
����.-
� F
7
����,'i!1
' � � �l.�ii
`���
� � '
. r . +
� .
� tip 1 � + �+� �.
_ . � ,
� C� \� � �-� ; w�_ -
� ° �` �
IK
y
.� �
� ��
,�
�
�
� ��
� �.�s s tl ��
� � ELY �
8 fi ` a��/7f1 6
/
� ��
�4' � �
�- z
� �
� � i 14
• ''L"a,� ��'K�,
\l�s.� k
� �
�c, t '� a � !
� 4� , ��:-' `
. :� � • �. � .�a?,s>
`J)
� ,: � �� �-.� �,,,� ``,� �,� `� ,_� �'�'� `� �
�-��:��-���_��� ���Ra
� 1 � ��
. � � �.��-�� �`� `� � � �
�y
� � ,'`� � '-L: � Zi.- ? � t
� � �� �• � iv � � �
Q ` ��-�-
``� `� , �,;;� ``� � ,�:� � � � . �_ f
.._� •�,: �:: � :::� . � r.-� ,, � � �'
��
� �
�.� �.f� �� � � �� `� � .
� -� �. �' .� .�
{ � -.� �.,.' .� � "',� ' � �
�� j ,.. -.
� �
.� "'�� �� „ � `�� r� +�.� . ,.'3
. � ' ��' � .� � M1' J ,�
�� �
'i.' '' ,�,-'' �
'� :� � �' � � �
�'� � `� F�
.�. � � ,�� � � '
` � y � � -� �� � ; `,� (--�
�.,
- �
� � �� _ -� .�-�. .
i'' .� '' c`:�, �� c.� - -
r' � ^� ,...% r�
�
�1��'�"/�"��'�i�� .
��` �
� .�
� �
� �:
��
�1 PR
__�___
L18ER7Y
� 1� � �� • 'fj �t.•r: -. •
'l ,�1� � '� � 6 g -i • - . ♦
� � �, � � • •
� � , � • • •
. . , . .
� 9 9 ♦ '� i • •
. y�� eie �ti�\• � • •
•
�� . �''� '�'�, • "� s 1\ � � �S
./� ?!•il�'
1 �-� � •
�� � Y 'f�
• • • •
• • • • •'� Z
�....10
�.139 ���• �
i • �d/Y•�, 2
14c ZONING MAP
Staff Report
VAR #93-21, 275 Ironton Street N.E., Mark Blegen
Page 1
A. STATED HARDSHIP:
"Fire damage repair"
B. ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF REVIEW:
Request
The petitioner requests three variances:
1. To reduae the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet
2. To reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet
3. To allow the reconstruction of a nonconforming struature
that was damaged to more than 50 0 of its value due to
fire
The request is for 275 Ironton Street N.E.
Site
Located on the property is a single family dwelling unit and
a detached two-car garage. The property is zoned R-1, Single
Family Dwelling, as are all surrounding properties. There is
a creek located north of the dwell.ing unit which flows from
the northeast to the southwest through the property.
Analvsis
The dwelling unit was damaged by fire in early August 1993,
and the damage sustained exceeds 50% of the fair market value
of the structure. Necessary repairs include removing all
interior wallboard insulation, flooring, ceilings, etc. Some.
of the structural support members may also need to be replaced
leaving only the exterior shell of the dwelling.
Front Yard Setback
Section 205.07.03.D.(1) of the Fridley City Code requires a
front yard setback of not less than 35 feet.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to allow for off-
street parking without encroaching on the public right-of-way
and also for aesthetic consideration to reduce the building
"line of sight" encroachment into the neighbor's front yard.
The first variance requested by the petitioner is to reduce
the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet. The dwelling
14D
Staff Report
VAR #93-21, 275 Ironton Street N.E., Mark Blegen
Page 2
is currently located 8.2 feet from the north right-of-way line
of Ironton Street. There is a 66 foot right-of-way located
in front of the dwelling unit. The Public Works Department
has indicated that they propose in 1994 to upgrade Ironton
Street to 32 feet wide with concrete curb and gutter. There
is adequate room within the existing right-of-way to
accomplish this improvement. However, the dwelling unit is
8.2 feet from the right-of-way, the closest any dwelling unit
is located to a public right-of-way.
As the structure is severely damaged, this is an appropriate
time for the petitioner to relocate the structure to meet the
35 foot front yard setback. The existing garage is located
34.7 feet from the property line; therefore, there is adequate
room for off-street parking of vehicles.
There may not be adequate room to relocate the structure at
the 35 foot setback due to the location of the creek located
in the rear yard. However, staff is unable to make that
determination at this time due to the lack of adequate
information. If there is not enough room, it would be
appropriate for a reduced variance to be granted. The amount
of variance requested should be minimized by the petitioner.
The petitioner should submit a plan which would increase the
front yard setback and yet accommodate adequate room from the
creek.
Side Yard Setback
Section 205.07.03.D.(2).(a� requires a side yard setback of
10 feet between any living area and side property line.
Public purpose served b�r this requirement is to maintain a
minimum of 20 feet between living areas in adjacent structures
and 15 feet between garages and living areas in adjacent
structures to reduce the possibility of fire and to allow for
aesthetically pleasing open areas around residential
structures.
The second variance request is to reduce the side yard setback
from 10 feet to 9.8 feet. This variance request is minimal
and would not have an adverse impact to adjacent properties
if it is granted. However, if the petitioner relocates the
dwelling unit, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to
meet the 10 foot side yard setback requirement as well.
14E
Staff Report
VAR #93-21, 275 Ironton Street N.E., Mark Blegen
Page 3
If the Appeals Commission grants this portion of the variance
request, it would be within the extent of similar variances
previously granted.
Structure Damaged More than 50%
Section 205.04.03.B allows upgrading of a nonconforming
structure to a safe condition, provided the necessary repairs
do not exceed 50� of the fair market value of such structure.
Public Purpose served by this requirement is to provide an
opportunity, when nonconforming structures and uses are
damaged more than 50%, for the City to bring them into
compliance with current codes.
The structure has been damaged to more than 50� of its value.
Due to the extensive repair work required to reconstruct the
dwelling, it is an appropriate time for the petitioner to
bring the property into substantial conformance. The interior
house systems will need to be completely replaced as well_as
substantial portions of the roof system. In essence, the
exterior siding will merely act as a shell.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Appeals Commission deny the variance
request to reconstruct the home at a nonconforming location.
The intent of the 50� rule of the nonconforming structure
regulations is to establish a point in time to correct non-
conformities. Given the amount of structural damage which has
occurred, it is appropriate for the City to require the
petitioner to identify a house location which meets as many
of the setbacks as possible.
A front yard setback variance
analysis should be conducted.
ations, staff also recommends
side yard setbacks as well.
Appeals Commission Action
may be necessary, but further
Because of these consider-
denial of the front yard and
The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial
of the variance request to the City Council. The Commission
recommended that the petitioners develop an alternative plan
or provide further evidence that the structure cannot be
relocated.
City Council Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals
Commission action.
14F
/�/QRTN �/�6 aF" 7`N� SourNiv�'sr ,
QU�9RTE2 oF •7's,�E �Yo2THEAST QfJR2rE2
aF S�c. 3.
No rz rN w Es r c o2,vE,e o f-nvE �/89 °,25'S8';E
Sour.ywESr 4��2r�.e oF TNE
N�RTNEqS7 QUqRTE2 OFSEC.3� ��0�
T. 30� ,e. z4, RHO/l.4 Caurlry,
/Y%/N/YESOTq. _ .
m
v
�
b
W
ti
�Q
titr
��
� W
0
� �
�
��
a�
Wa
2
�W
� N
We
��
� �
�M
�
� �
�O
� �
rz.3
EXi17. �
N
GRa. w
/1.�
,E�x�ss. �
f/ousE d
m
�� �99°.ZD'45•• �
�
75. DD
sa9 °z3'zs"w
�� �
�XisT.
CONG.
CuRB
•---- —
�Ti2EET
,�X,s>. a.r ,aE.�M
DESCRIPTION:
That part of
Northeast Qu
30, Range 2
described as
Beginning atj
Southwest
Quarter; the�
line of saia
Northaast Qu
feet; thence {
west line o�
the Northeas,
extension oi
Ironton Stre
along said ea
of 75.00 f@
Southwest
Quarter; th
west line to�
Subject to
14G � SI1'E PLA�
'� Halcanson
Anderson
�1� Assoc., Inc.
�8���=��,�v�w�,���,
222 Mon�oe Strcet, Anoka, Mlmesota 55303
612//21•5860
NORTH L/NE OF TNE SouTNWCST
QURRTCR OF THE NoRTNGqST GjUARTER
aF SEe. 3.
NoxrNwESr CoR.vEa Of 7HE ,yB9°,25 58�iE
SoUTNWCST tAuq/tTER ef TNE > �/�
NaZTNEaST O[iqRTE.� OFSE[.3 / SV(/
T 30� .Q. 24, RNOK�' CouKry �
/YI/NNfSOTN. �� l
� L v
����
�
�L�;
3���a
�����'��;,
S�° 3"1'!z
o Denotes �ron Monumenc
5cale / " : SO'
� 290 p�� 3.2•33
Sec. T. R
�O Z
�
M � .
-� E��J
( �•�u
t ��
L��U �`�2
ti
STi2EET
f.r.s�: B r. B[�eM
Certific�te of Survey
FOR
MARK BLE�EN
DESCRZPTION:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township
30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota,
described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of said
Southwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter; thence easterly along the north
line of said Southwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter a distance of 75.00
feet; thence southerly, parallel with the
west line of said Southwest Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter, to the easterly
extension of the northerly line of
Ironton Street N.E.; thence westerly,
along said easterly extension, a distance
of 75.00 feet to the west line of
Southwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter; thence northerly, along said
west line to the point of beginning.
Subject to easements of record, if any.
1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by
me or under my direct wpeMslon u�d that i am a duy Regis-
tered lard Surveyor under tfie laws � the Swte of Mlnrxsoca.
,�J��%�i� /2263
8� 2/GT.O/ �.NO.
Date �ob No.
'� � nson
„� An �Slnc.
�,S��n.��,b �.,w���
222 Monme Strcet Anolu.AVmewta 15303
6t2/127-5860
NORTN L/NE oF THE SoUTNWEST
QURRTfR oF THE Ko2TNGAST f�UqIeTE2
oF Src. 3.
/'�ORTNWESf CORNfR OP THE �yB9°25 58�.E
SouTN++'CST �9uq2TER c✓TNE
NOR7NE.vST OUqRTER OFSEC.3 T5.d0 �
T, 30� ,Q. 24. 9NOKA CauKry
M/NNCSO �'N. � � �.. 1
V► � C ��
^ (� 1�
V�'1�
1
�
�'L�`j-
3��1a
��`� °��'��;,
5�° 3�'lz
0 om«es �ron n1�,mer,c
Scale / •• - SD'
g� 290 p,8e 32•33
Sec L R
�
,
�
E��,J
� ����
\�
��-�,'��12
ti
STREET
B r. Bcaiy
Certificate of Survey
FOR
MARK BLEGEN
DESCRIPTION:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 3, Township
30, Range 24, Anoka County, Minnesota,
described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of said
Southwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter; thence easterly alonq the north
line of said Southwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter a distance of 75.00
feet; thence southerly, parallel with the
west line of said Southwest Quarter of
the Northeast Quarter, to the easterly
extension of the northerly line of
Ironton Street N.E.; thence westerly,
along said easterly extension, a distance
of 75.00 feet to the west line of
Southwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter; thence northerly, along said
west line to the point of beginninq.
Subject to easements of record, if any.
I hereby cerdfy that this w�vey, pian or report wu prepared by
me or under my direct wpervision and that I am a duy Regis-
tered land Surveyor under tfie laws of the State of Minnesoca.
__���9� � /2263
��,�9�93 2/GT.D/ � N`
Date Job Na .
CTTY OF F�tIDLCY
G431 UNIV��iSITX
AVENUE N.E.
FRI�LEY, MN 55432
(G12) 571-3450
�
. �'ii
,r -
COIVIMUNIT'Y D�'VELOPMENT DEPARTM�NT
VAI�I,A,NC� A.�'PLICA'r'ION FQR�VI
�'�ZO �RTY INFO�.1ViATION - si�te plan required for submittal; see attached
Address: 275 IRONTON STREET
Property Identiflcation Number (PIN) R03 30 24 13 0004 00456937
C.Cgal deSCriptiOn:UNPLATTED CITY OF FRIDLEY, TH PT OF SWl/4 OF NE1/4 DES AS FOL
�� �IOCk Tract/Addition BEG AT NW COR.
Cacrent zoning: � Square footage/acreagc
Rcason for variance and h�rdship: �'�RE DAMAGE REPAIR ��
,
Section of City Code:
Havc yau operated a business in a city which 'required a business license?
Yes No xx If yes, which city?
If yes, what type of business7
Was that license ever dented or revoked? Xes No xx
�'EE OWN .R IN +ORMA ION (as it appeaxs utt the pzoperty title)
(Convact Purchasers: Fee Owne�rs must sign this fo�nm prior to procesSing)
NAME BLEGEN, MARK
ADDRESS 275•:.IRONTON STREET NORTHEAST
MN 55432
SIGNATURE
Y'�xME PHONS 786 1 � s 2
DATE
ADDRES$
SZGNATURE
DAYTIME PE�ONfi
- —dATE
Fee: � 100.00 $ 60.00 --- � for r�sidendal prr�perties �
Permit VAR # GI. ? — . _ . � . Receipt # �'7 �
Applicadon received by:•
Scheduled Appeals Commission date: �l 3i %-�
Scheduled Ci�ty Cvunctl date: _ _ _
14J
Mr. Kuechle agreed. He stated
line with the hardship of requi
addition over six inches. He wou
ie overall impact is minimal in
ing the petitioner to move the
�d also vote for approval.
MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by
request, VAR #93-21, by Diane Ha'
�2�,(a) of the Fridley Zoning Code,
from 10 feet to 9.5 feet, to allow t
on Lot 20 and the north 1/2 of L°t 1
the same being 6627 Anoka Street N.
Dr. Vo�s, to approve varian�e
.da, per Section 205.07.03.D.
to reduce the side yard setback
�e construct�aknGrove Additionn
�\_ Block 2 ,
IIPON A VOICS VOTE, ALL VOTING 7
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED iTNANIMO
, VICE-CHAIRP8R80N RIIECHLE
;Y .
2. c:vN��u����..-- --
Per Section 205.07.03.D.(1)
of the Fridley Zoning Code, to
reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 8.2 feet;
Per Section 205.07.03.D-(2)•�a)
of the Fridley Zoning Code,
to reduce the side yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet;
Per Section 205.04.03.B of the Fridley Zoning Code to allow
the construction of a nonconforming structure that was damaged
more than 500 of its value due to fire damage,
On that part of the Southwe Ra Que 24 r Anoka Countye Mi �n��
of Section 3, Township 30, g
described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest ence easterlylalong the nor�th line
of the Northeast Quarter; th a distance
of said Southwest Quarter of the No arallel4w th the west line
of 75.00 feet; thence southerly, P to the
of said Southwest Quarter of the Norlines of4 Ironton Street
easterly extension of the northsaid easterly extension, a
N.E.; thence westerly, along
distance of 75.00 feet to t�ri nce northerly S�alo SSSa'�idawest
of the Northeast Quarterinnin
line to the point of beg g•
Subject to easements of record, if any.
The same being 275 Ironton Street N.E.
seconded by Dr. Vos, to waive the reading of
MOTIpN by Ms. Smith, ublic hearing.
the public hearing notice and open the p-
ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAZRPER30N RUECHLE
UPON A VOICE VOTE, T�E p�BLIC gEp,gING OPEN AT 7:46
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND
p.M.
14K
c'iraui....... _____—_ _
Ms. McPherson stated this property is located in the in t e
ro ert is zoned R-1, Single
Riverview Heights neighborhood. The p P y arcels. The Coon
Family Dwelling, as are all surrounding p
Rapids/Fridley border is directly to the north of the subject
property.
Ms. McPherson stated a single family dwelling unit and a two-car
detached garage are located on the property. A creek runs through
the property to the rear of the dwelling.
Ms. McPherson stated the single famiiy dwelling was substantially
fire in early August 1993. The Building Inspection
damaged by air the damage will
Department has determined that the cost to rep ge airs
exceed 500 of the fairl �e� eo vWallboard hinsu atione• flooring,
include removing all ort members.
ceilings, and some of the structural supp
two-car garage is
Ms. McPherson stated the firs ee�rlaThe exi ting uce the front yar
setback from 35 feet to 8.2 f the 35 foot requirement.
set back at 32.7 feet, almost meeting
Ironton Street has an appropriate width of 66 feet. Therefore, the
ears to be set back an appropriate distance from the
structure app h sical street and not from the
street, but that is from the described.
public right-of-way as legally
anted. There is adequate.room
Ms. McPherson stated a variance of 8.2 feet would be the m�he
extreme front yard variance ever gr e and
for off-street parking of vehicles 1 ect dwellinyeaPpeag tO be set
dwellings on ei�oeriateesetbackssubj
back at the app P
there
Ms. McPherson stated that based on a revised site sub t een the
appears to be adequate room to relocate tears to be approximately
existing location a hisewase not surveyedPby a surveyor so it may
77 feet. However,
not be totally accurate.
has been
Ms. McPherson stated that sinc andh sinceult e edwelli q t ex re�e�
variance granted by the City ro riate
damaged more than 50% of its value, it would be app P,
relocate the structure so that it conforms with the Zoning Code
requirements.
ired to
Ms. McPherson stated staff re ea ria the peti i nerlbe requ re uce
the front yard setback be deni irements.
relocate the dwelling to conform with Zoning Code requ
Ms. McPherson stated the second var his varianceerequesteislminimal
setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet. T acent properties. However,
and would not adversely llP ed to re locate the dwelling, it would
if the petitioner is requ�
be appropriate to relocate it to meet the 10 foot setback as wel
14L
AYYl�[iLO •.v••.•�--- -
as the front yard setback. However, if the Commission chooses o
approve this variance, it would be within the extent of similar
variances previously granted.
Ms . McPherson stated the third variance request is to aliow -tir�
u rading of a nonconforming structure to a safe condition,
pg repairs to do not exceed 50� of the fair
provided the necessary �lic purpose for this code
market value of the structure. The p ro riate to
requirement is to provide a time which would be aPP P
brin nonconforming structures into conformancedam gea h itZwould
g as t h e d w e l l i n g i s substantially l i a n c e.
Code. Again, the structure in to com p
be an appropriate time to bring
Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends that the Appeals Commission
d denial of the variance request to reconstruct the home
recommen location.
at its nonconforming the Rice Creek
Ms. Smith asked if there is any need for approval by
Watershed District.
Ms. McPherson stated that this property is within the Six Cities
there are no zoning or setback
Watershed District. At this time, The Engineering Department,
requirements from the creek area•all watershed requests, did not
which is responsible for reviewin To riate setback from the creek,
make any comment regarding an app P or any protection for
any impact to the dwelling unit by flooding,
the creek itself. the house would
Mr. Kuechle stated he would like to know how moving
impact the petitioner.
Mr. Mark Blegen stated that,
economically, it impacts them
negatively. They did not have a��lot of 1 o ket'Ceifn th Y have to
they would have to take money
out of p
destroy the cement foundation and move th� tou�oveathe houseaback
moving the house back, it might be alriespecially this year.
30 feet, because the creek does flood,
asked if there are any other factors that would necessitate
Dr. Vos ro ert line.
keeping the house within 8 feet of the p P Y
Mr. Blegen stated he did not think so. He stated he did not know
e easement on his front yard. In looking
why there is such a larg his tiouse is in
down the street er�°ther houses.t The house to the west is in line
line with all th
with his.
Dr. Vos asked that if the house was moved back, what would the
petitioner do about the existing garage'
Mr. Blegen stated that in order tfl �enand constructrahneweone.the
lot, he might have to raze the garag
� ►�t i
Dr. Vos stated that the creek oV an f the house back on thellotashe
If the City Council approves m 9
would like someone to determine can cto y H e did not want-the City
and just how far back the house 9
to force the petitioners to move the house back into the flooding
area.
anded in 1994 as proposed
Ms. Smith stated that if the str shel wo d be concerned about the
by the Engineering Department, too close to the new street.
house in its existing location being
. Shauna Blegen stated that she did not have a problem with
Ms �o�ed back on the lot, but someone needs to
having the dwelling
address the footage from the b ai o likeeto be able to atta b��
flood every spring. She would
house to the existing garage.
the house would
erous for their small
Ms. Blegen agreed that if the street is expande ,
be too close to the street and at lthelr financial situation after
son. But, they are also looking
losing everything in the fire.
Leno stated he is Ms. Blegen's bre �e a n nconforming
M r. S t a n l e y wa n t i n g t o c o r r o d d s h a p e d
could understand the City
odd with a quasi cul-de-sac at
situation. One of the problems is that this is a ve
lot, and the street itself is very along with the creek at
the end of the street. These conditions,
the back of the property, create � touthem if thel house has�toebe
for the Blegens is the added �os this house might have
moved. If the fire hadn't happened, ears. He asked that the
continued at this setback for another 50 y
Cit weigh all the factors and come up with the best decision for
Y
all parties involved. ublic
MO_ by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the p
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRpERSON RUECHLE
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND TAE PIIBLIC HEARING CIASED AT 8:10
P.M.
r. Vos stated the petitioners would no of the house theThisaisnan
D orit
been a fire which destroyed of aFridley to make the structure
opportunity for the City ortunity for the petitioner to use
conforming, and it is also an oPP than it is now• He would suggest
their property in a different way could rearrange
that the petitioners give some ta� ge a d st� 11 be set back �o erty
a new home to use the existing q
from the front property line and 10 feet from the side p P
line on the west side.
14N
P►YY�AI,a ..�,,.,-a�...----
out a new plan.
Dr. Vos stated he would recomms ns nde t�1 �o i y three varla�ed
requests to gi v e t h e p e t i t� o n e
He urged the petitioners to bo� the creek ha t t h e h o u s e i s p a
on the lot a safe distance fr
s. Smith stated that even though she could see a defi lacedaonsthe
M e of the lot and how the house was p She
in the odd shap rove the variance request as proposed.
lot, she could not app
would recommend denial of all three variances. etitioners,
Mr. Kuechle stated it llossrfromlthe fires and becausepcke C�riythe
both for the personal �oving the house ba
asking them to add to the cost by ier in
he believed the petitioners will be much happ
other hand, est is denied and the house is moved
five years if the variance requ
back on the lot.
seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend to City
MO_ TIpN by Dr. Vos, est, VAR #93-22� bY I"�ark Blegen,
Council denial of varian � o�he Fridley Zoning Code, to reduce
per Section 205.07.03.D.( ) er Section
the front yard setback from 35 feet t° Code, to reduce t he si de
205.07.03.D.(2)•(a) of the Fridley Zonian per Section 205.04.03.B
yard setback from 10 feet to 9.8 feet, o of its value
of the Fridley Zoning Code to �a ed moree than 5 ruCtion of a
nonconforming structure that was da g
due to fire damage at 275 Ironton Street N.E.
UPON A VOICE VOTE,
ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RIIECHLE
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIT"IOUSLY- Council on
Ms. McPherson stated this item will go to the City
September 13, 1993-
ADJOURNMENT•
• seconded by Ms. Smith, to adjourn the meeting.
MO_ by Dr. Vos, Vice-Chairperson Kuechle
Upon a voice vote, all voting aYe� and the meeting adjourned
declared the motion carried unanimously
at 8:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
�, �v*�/-'C
�Ly � e Saba
Recording 5ecretary
140
i _
�
J
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
September 9, 1993
William Burns, City Manager �,
�•� •
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Resolution Approving Extension of a Lot Split,
L.S. #93-01, by Westminster Corporation
on March 15, 1993, the City Council approved the lot split
application for Westminster Corporation to construct Norwood
Square, a 51 unit senior housing project. The subdivision
ordinance requires the lot split to be recorded within 180 days.
Westminster has requested a continuance for one year to allow them
to complete the approval process with HUD (see attached letter)
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached
resolution as presented.
BD/dn
M-93-514
�V'�estminster
Bui/ding Paruaershi�s fora Caring Community
WESTMINSTER CORPORATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
*Joseph Errigo, President
*Edward Driscoll, Chair
*Albert Colianni
*Anne Heegaar.�
*Josephinc Rca�Taylor
Patrick Comva��
Diana Markfort
Mary Leintz
Frank Sno�vdcn
Jerry Madsen
Rev. Kevin McDonough
Ellen Brown
*Executive Committee
William Cosgriff �of Counsel)
WESTMINSTEF
MANAGEMENT
CORPORATIOI�
Joseph Errigo
John Homer
Susan Sands
WESTMINSTER
RESIDENT SER�'10ES
CORPORATIOI�
Joseph Errigo
Richard McCarth��
Barbara Kilbounx
September 3, 1993
Barbara Dacy, AICP
Community Development Director
Municipal Center
6431 University Avenue, N.E.
Fridley, MN 5432
Re: Pdorwbod Square Senior Housing
Dear Barbara:
As we discussed, the above-captioned project is moving
forward. We expect to receive HUD's conditional financing
commitment shortly, and thus we have engaged the project
architect to complete construction drawings and have
directed our contractor to �obtain firm bids. We expect this
to be accomplished during November 1993, at which time
we will submit to HUD for firm commitment (the final stage
in HUD's funding process). Once HUD issues its firm
commitment, we can proceed to closing.
Given the backlog and understaffing at HUD, our ontimistic
time frame for closing is spring of 1994; however, it is quite
possible that closing could occur later than that. Given the
delays we have experienced in dealing with HUD, we request
that the city extend for one year (to September 1994) the
deadline for recording the deed on the lot that was split off
in contemplation of this project.
Thank you for your cooperation on this matter.
Sin
_ �
ose L. Holmber
Vice President of Operations
328 West Kello� Boulevard • St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 •(612)��1Z50 • Fax (612) 291-1003
/�
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFEIRMATIVE ACI'ION ORGANIZATION
RESOLUTION NO. - 1993
RESOLUTION EXTENDING APPROVAL OF A SUBDIVISION,
LOT SPLIT, L.S. #93-01, TO CREATE TWO SEPARATE
PARCELS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF 61ST AVENUE
AND WEST OF 5TH 5TREET
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at their March 15,
1993 meeting; and the Planning Commission stipulation attached as
Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, such approval was to create two separate parcels from the
Norwood Addition to Fridley Park plat and Lot 5, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 59, to be described as follows:
Parcel A: Lots one to sixteen (1-16), inclusive in Block One (1);
and Lots one and thirty, in Block Two (2), Norwood Addition to
Fridley Park, according to the duly recorded plat thereof.
That part of vacated Kent St. (now known as 62nd Ave.), dedicated
in the plat of "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lying between
the northerly extensions of the east and west lines of Block 2,
said plat.
That part of vacated 5th Ave. (now known as 4th Street), dedicated
in the plat of "Norwood Additian to Fridley Park", lying between
the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 30, Block 2, said
plat, and the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 16, Block
1, said plat.
That part of the vacated alley in Block 1, "Norwood Addition to
Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the north
line of Lot l, Block 1 and the westerly extension of the south line
of Lot 8, Block 1.
That part of the vacated alley in Block 2, "Norwood Addition to
Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the north
line of Lot 1, said Block 2, and the westerly extension of the
south line of Lot 1, said Block 2.
Parcel B: All of Lots 2 through 29, inclusive in Block Two (2),
"Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", according to the duly recorded
plat thereof, Anoka County, Minnesota.
That part of vacated 5th Ave. (now known as 4th Street), dedicated
in the plat of "Norwood Addition to Fridley Park", lying between
the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 16, Block 2, said
plat, and the westerly extension of the north line of Lot 29, Block
2, said plat.
15B
Resolution No. - 1993
Page 2
That part of the vacated alley in Block 2, "Norwood Addition to
Fridley Park", lying between the westerly extension of the north
line of Lot 2, Block 2 and the westerly extension of the south line
of Lot 15, said Block 2.
Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 59, Anoka County, Minnesota.
Except the South 180 feet of the West 183 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 30, Range
24, Anoka County, Minnesota. And except that part of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said-Section 14, described as
commencing at the Southwest corner thereof; thence Northerly along
the West line thereof 30 feet; thence Easterly parallel with the
South line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
said Section 14, a distance of 127.22 feet; thence Northeasterly
on a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 20 feet, a
distance of 31.22 feet; thence Northerly, tangent left having a
radius of 20 feet, a distance of 31.22 feet; thence Northerly,
tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 100.96 feet;
thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the left, having a
radius of 45 feet, a distance of 31.99 feet to the North line of
the South 180 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of said Section 14, said point being the point of beginning
of the tract to be described; thence continuing Northwesterly along
the last described curve, a distance of 16.7 feet; thence
Northwesterly tangent to the last described curve 56.94 feet;
thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the right having a
radius of 175 feet, a distance of 53.71 feet to its intersection
with a line parallel with and 30 feet East of the West line of the
Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14;
thence Southerly along said line parallel with and 30 feet East of
the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter,
to the North line of the South 180 feet of said Southeast Quarter
of the Southwest Quarter; thence Easterly along the North line of
said South 180 feet to the actual point of beginning. And except
that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said
Section 14, described as commencing at the Southwest corner
thereof; thence Northerly along the West line thereof 30 feet;
thence Easterly parallel with the South line of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 14, a distance of
127.22 feet; thence Northeasterly on a tangential curve to the left
having a radius of 20 feet, a distance of 31.22 feet; thence
Northerly tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 100.96
feet; thence Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the left having
a radius of 45 feet, a distance of 48.69 feet; thence Northwesterly
tangent to the last. described curve 56.94 feet; thence
Northwesterly on a tangential curve to the right having a radius
of 175 ieet, a distance of 53.71 feet to the East line of the West
30 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said
Section 14, said point of intersection being the actual point of
beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing
15C
Resolution No. - 1993
Page 3
Northwesterly along said curve having a radius of 175 feet, a
distance of 23 feet to the East line of the West 15 feet of said
Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Southerly along
said East line to the intersection with the North line of the South
30 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence
Easterly along a line parallel with and 30 feet North of the South
line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance
of 15 feet to the East line of the West 30 feet of said Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Northerly along the East
line of the West 30 feet of said Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter to the actual point of beginning. Subject to road right-
of-ways on 61st Avenue N.E. and the East frontage road of State
Highway No. 47 (University Avenue).
WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of Survey
from the owner; and
WHEREAS, such approval will create two separate parcels from the
Norwood Addition to Fridley Park plat and Lot 5, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 59; and
WHEREAS, the petitioner, Westminster Corporation, has requested an
extension for one year to September 1, 1994 to obtain project
approval from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the
petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County by 5eptember
1, 1994 or else such approval shall be null and void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1993.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
15D
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
�
EXHIBIT A
Resolution No. - 1993
Page 4
l. The petitioner shall execute and record an open air easement
to provide an additional 4, 830 square feet of land area on the
St. William's parcel. The proposed easement language shall
be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution of the
easement. The easement shall not be used to calculate
setbacks or lot area calculations on the St. William's
property. If necessary, a consent by a mortgage holder shall
also be submitted.
15E
_- __ _ __ _ _ _ _. ___ _ _ .
r �
�
-- �
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
September 9, 1993 �.
William Burns, City Manager �'
�
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Approval of Relocation Consultant Contract with
Professional Redevelopment Resources
On August 3, 1992, the City Council authorized condemnation of the
Nelson property at 6070 and 6074 Central Avenue. As part,of the
condemnation proceedings, a relocation consultant must be hired by
the City to determine appropriate relocation benefits for the
tenants of the two single family homes on the property.
Kirk Schnitker, of Professional Redevelopment Resources, assisted
the City with the last single family home acquisition and
relocation for the Riverview Heights project. We found his work
to be outstanding and recommend him again on this project.
The total contract cost is $1,690, or $845 for each home.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the contract as
presented.
BD/dn
M-93-515
This agreement, entered into as the 13th day of September, 1993 by
the City of Fridley (hereinafter referred to as Contractor), and
Professional Redevelopment Resources, Inc. (hereinafter referred
to as Consultant).
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Contractor desires the provision of certain technical
assistance and other services pursuant to the terms of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 117.50 et. seq., and/or the Uniform Relocation
and Real Properties Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, whichever is
applicable, in connection with the implementation of the Moore Lake
Beach project as heretofore adopted by the Contractor, and
WHEREAS, the Contractor desires that the Consultant provide such
assistance and services to provide for relocation assistance, in
this project, and
WHEREAS, the Contractor proposes to acquire certain real property
and desires that the Consultant furnish the Contractor certain
services with respect to such property, and the consultant
represents that the consultant is fully qualified to perform such
services and will furnish such services personally.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
Consultant agrees to provide services set forth below under Section
I entitled "Residential Relocation Service (Scope of Services)" and
the Contractor agrees to pay for such services in the amount and
manner set forth below under Section II entitled "Compensation",
and Section III entitled "Method of Payment of Fees".
SECTION I: Residential Relocation Services (Scflpe of ServicesZ
A. The Consultant will distribute an information booklet on the
residential relocation assistance and all appropriate forms
and data to each residential occupant expected to be
displaced. The Consultant will:
l. Obtain a signed receipt for the informational statement
provided by the Contractor in accordance with the
applicable regulations.
2. Explain the residential relocation program and the
displacee's responsibility to receive benefits.
3. Explain how to receive various kinds of assistance in
finding new locations.
4. Explain the residential relocation needs and prepare
Family Record Card.
5. Provide Notices of Displacement within 30 days after
initiation of negotiations.
16A
Agreement
Page 2
6. Analyze existing data to determine eligibility of the
displacee's relocation expenses for compensation.
7. Interview residential displacee to determine housing
needs.
8. Identify and determine the cost of comparable replacement
housing.
9. Provide referrals to replacement housing units.
10. Provide other social services, on an as-needed basis.
11. Assist the displacee in determining the more advantageous
payment alternative to claim for moving expenses and
provide further instructions on how to proceed.
12. Issue 90 day notiae as necessitated after referral to
replacement housing is made.
13. Determine if selected replacement location is decent,
safe, and sanitary.
14. Assist eligible residential occupant in preparation of
claim for Replacement Housing Payment for 180 day
homeowners.
15. Assist eligible residential occupant in preparation of
claim for Rental Assistance Payment and/or pown Payment
Assistance for 90 day occupants.
16. Assemble the appropriate claim forms and documentation
for signature and submission for approval.
17. Transmit to the Contractor the final claim for its
action. The claim will include the amount of payment to
be made and any special considerations.
B. The Consultant does not assume the responsibility for:
* Preparation of Status Reports
* Housing of Last Resort Services
* Accounting and Record Keeping (except as related to
specific claim)
* Payment for direct loss appraisals, property analyses,
and moving cost estimates and/or bids �
SECTION II: COMPENSATION
The Consultant shall provide all necessary tenant relocation
services invoiving the two subject rental properties. The total
that shall be charged for subject services shall be $845.00 for
each relocation for a total not to exceed $1,690.00.
. :
Agreement
Page 3
SECTION III: METHOD OF PAYMENT OF FEES
Monthly re�uisitions may be made subject to receipt of a statement
from the Consultant specifying that it has performed the work in
conformance with the Contract and that it is entitled to receive
the amount requisitioned under the terms of the Contract. The
Contractor will make payment on such invoices upon receipt,
provided, however, that payment shall not be made for any
incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work until same is remedied
by Consultant without additional cost to the Contractor.
SECTION IV: LIABILITIES
A. The City agrees to hold the consultant harmless from any and
all claims or causes of action arising from the City's
performance of this agreement.
B. The Consultant agrees to hold the City, its agents and
employees harmless from any and all claims or causes of action
arising from the performance of the services identified as the
Consultant�s responsibility in this agreement including but
not limited to consultant error and services that consultant
completes for the City as a result of any changes made in the
contracted services as allowed by Section VII of this
agreement. This clause shall not be construed to limit any
legal remedies the City may pursue in the event that the
consultant fails to fulfill the Consultant's obligations
pursuant to this agreement.
SECTION V: PROPERTY COVERED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT
6070 Central Avenue N.E. and 6074 Central Avenue N.E., both in
Fridley, Minnesota. These are tenant occupied properties.
SECTION VI: CONTRACT PERIOD
The Consultant shall commence performance of this contract upon
Notice to Proceed by the City Manager or upon execution of this
Contract and shall complete performance of this contract no later
than sixty (60) days after the last occupant of real property has
vacated the proj ect area and all appropriate documentation has been
provided by the displacee to the Consultant.
SECTION VII: CHANGES IN CONTRACT
The Contractor or the Consultant may request changes in the scope
of the services to be provided. Such changes, including any
increase or decrease in compensation, which are mutually agreed
upon by and between the Contractor and the Consultant shall be
incorporated in written amendment io this Contract.
SECTION VIII: ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION
A. Interest to Certain Federal Officials
No member of or delegate to the Congress of the United States,
1 sC+
Agreement
Page 4
and no other Federal Official, shall be admitted to any share
or part of this Contract or to any benefit from this Contract.
B. Covenant Against Contingent Fees
The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained
any company or persons other than bonafide employees or
technical subcontractors working solely for the Consultant,
to solicit or secure this Contract, and that it has not paid
or agreed to pay any company or person other than a bonafide
employee or technical subcontractor working solely for the
Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee,
gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting
from the award or making of this Contract. For breach or
violation of this warranty, the Contractor shall have the
right to annul this Contract without liability.
C. Termination of Contract
The Contractor or the Consultant may terminate this Contract
or renegotiate this Contract upon thirty (30) days written
notice. In the event of termination, all property and
finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, and reports
purchased or prepared by the consultant under this Contract
shall be disposed of according to the Contractor directives
and the Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for any
unreimbursed expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred in
satisfactory performance of this Contract.
D. Extent of Contract
This Contract represents the entire and integrated agreement
between the Consultant and Contractor and supersedes all prior
negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written
or oral. This contract may be amended only by written
instrument signed by both Consultant and Contractor.
E. Personnel
The Consultant represents that it has or will secure all
personnel required in performing the services under this
Contract as provided above. All of the services herein will
be performed by the Consultant or under its supervision, and
all personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and
shall be authorized under State and local law to perform such
services.
F. Non-Discrimination
The Consultant will not discriminate against any employee, or
applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, sex,
national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status
in regard to public assistance, or age. The Consultant will
take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are
employed, and that employees are treated during their
employment, without regard to race, creed, color, sex,
� . �
Agreement
Page 5
G.
H.
national origin, religion, marital status, disability, status
in regard to public assistance, or age. Such action shall
include, but not be limited to, the following: employment,
upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment advertising,
layoff, or termination; rates of pay or other forms of
compensation; and selection for training, including
apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous
places, available to employees and applicants for employment,
notices to be provided by the State setting forth the
provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. In addition, the
Consultant will in all solicitations and advertisements placed
by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified
applicants will receive consideration for employment without
regard to race, creed, color, sex, national origin, religion,
marital status, disability, status in regard to public
assistance, or age.
Assignment
The Consultant shall neither assign nor transfer any rights
or obligations under this Agreement without prior written
consent of the City.
Special Administrative Provisions
All records pertaining to this Agreement shall be maintained
by the Consultant for a period of at least three (3) years
after the creation of such records.
Ih` WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the Consultant have executed
the Contract on or as the date first written above.
�
�
B�- :
Professional
2300 Central
Minneapolis,
Phone: (612)
Redevelopment
Avenue N.E.
MN
789-5151
Mayor William J. Nee
City of Fridley
William W. Burns
City Manager
City of Fridley
Resources Inc.
16E
Date
Date
Date
��
0
RE
�t K �
r
/
' (D
I O
2
r.�. tty%-u4
Gary Lenar.t
� • �
•
i
. � r
7
1 sF ZONING NAAP
Di
a
n
'1
RO[3ERT A. GU71'
13ERNARD E. STL'fFEN
RlCHARD A: ML=RRILI
DARRELL A. JENSEN
JEFFREY S. JOHNSON
RUSSELL H. CRO�C'DER
JON P. ERICKSON
LAWRENCE R. JOHNSON
UAVID A. COSSI
TNOMAS I'. b.tALONE
MICHAEL F. HUhLEY
SHARON L. HALL
VIRGIL C. HERRICK
HERMAN L. TALLE
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
ATTORI�EYS AT [.A�Y�
400 �orthtown Financial Plaza
200 Coon Rapids $oulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55433
(612) 780-8�00 FAX (612) 780-1777
Writer's Direct Line: (612) 783-5124
July 28, 1993
Richard E. Berger
Attorney at Law
240 Chester Street
Suite 8
St. Paul, MN 55107
RE: Peter A. Berger and Julie A. Berger,
his wife
6070 Central Avenue Northeast
Fridley, MN 55432
Petition for Condemnation in the Anoka
County District Court
File No. C5-92-9097
Dear Mr. Berger:
JUL � u (�.7J I CHARL ES MHSEYI:ORA
WILLIAM M. HANSEN
DANIEL D. GANTER, JR.
BEVERLY K. DODGE
GREGG V. HERRICK
JAMES A HOEFT
JOAN M. QUADE
SCOTT M. LEPAK
S7EVEN L. MACI:EY
DAViD M. WEIGEL
ROBERT C. HYNES
1935-1993
Your letter of July 16, 1993 addressed to William W. Burns, City
Manager, has been referred to me.
I have reviewed your letter and the request regarding relocatiorz
benefits. I find that your request is consistent with Minnesota
Law and I have asked that the City Staff appoint a relocation
specialist to work with Peter A. and Julie A. Berger.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
,
� �~.
�^ �� ;`_�
Virgil C. Herrick
vCH:jjh �
cc: William W. Burns
A� ��ual j�p��c Emplocrr
l
RICHARD E. BERGER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
2a0 CHESTER STREET SUITE 8
ST. PAUL, MN 55107
(6t2�291-2902
July 16, 1993
City of Fridley
Fridley Municipal Center
6431 University Ave. N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
� u � 19 19�3
Re: Peter A. Berger and
Julie A. Berger, his wife
6070 Central Ave. N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Petition for Condemnation in the Anoka County District Court
File No. C5-92-9097
Atten: William W. Burns
City Manager
Gentlemen:
I represent Peter A. Berger and Julie A. Berger, his wife,
who are tenants occupying the above property. They were tenants
of said property prior to and when the condemnation proceedings
were commenced by the City of Fridly under the above captioned
file number.
The purpose of this letter is to request that you provide
Peter A. Berger and Julie A. Berger all relocation benefits to
which they are entitled under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117.
As provided by law, please provide them with relocation assistance
advisory services. They are in immediate need of relocating in a
comparable replacement dwelling in the project area. They wish to
apply their cash benefit, to which they are presently entitled in
sum of $5,250.00 for payment of rent up to 42 months, to apply as
a down payment and for incidental costs for the purchase of a decent,
safe and sanitary replac�ment dwelling.
Please
undertaking
replacement
REB/r
acknowledge receipt of this letter and confirm your
to assist my clients in relocating in a comparable
dwelling they could purchase in the project area.
CC: Peter A. Berger and .
Julie A. Berger
16H
ncerely,
1��� ���
�
Richard E. Berger
Attorney at Law
r _
�
.
Community Development Department
PLANIVING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: September 9, 1993
TO: William Burns, City Manager !I��� •
�
FROM:
SU&TECT:
Introduction
Attached are
properties.
obtained for
City.
Historv
Barbara Dac�, Community Development Director
Steven Barg, Pianning Assistant
License Applications for Residential Rental
Properties at 541 - 53 1/2 Avenue N.E. and 4042
Main Street N.E.
rental license applications for the above-referenced
Fridley City Code 220 requires that licenses be
operation of all residential rental property in the
Durinq 1990, staff discovered that these properties had each been
previously issued licenses for two rental units. However, both
sites are located in R-1 zoning districts, where two-family
dwellings are not permitted.
On May 6, 1991, the City Council considered, but did not approve,
an ordinance amendment regarding the mother-in-law apartment issue.
At that time, it was determined that those in violation of the
current ordinance would be given three years to bring their
properties into compliance. During the past two years, the City
Council has issued annual rental licenses for these locations, and.
staff has included letters with the licenses reminding the property
owners of the need to convert to single family dwellings by May 6,
1994.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve these two rental
licenses only through May 6, 1994. Since this covers only eight
months, the City would refund one-third ($8.00) of the rental
license fees received. Staff has sent written notices to the
property owners (copies attached) of this recommendation and the
City Council consideration at its September 13, 1993 meeting.
SB/dn
M-93-516
r
�.zg�5
City of Fridley� Minnesoea
c/o Fridiey Fire Dept.
6431 University Ave. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
(612)572-3612
LICENSE APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY
TO TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA: The undersigned hereby makes application to license a residential
dwellin� ii� accorclance wit6 Chapter 220 of the City Code of �'ridley.
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Builciin Address: 541 53 1/2 Avenue IVE No. of Units: 2 Lic. Fee: 24.00
O�vncr's Name: Tom Olin Phone #: 571-5833
Owner's Address: - =�36-�-ivers-� e-�i�a -1�IE_______.
City State Zip:---F�i�Iey; ��4�----
�.}t�..��i�y:+�yp,�'r� �3-y�;£y=.���p�y.{�ayf�s���a�}.a{(� liA�,�p��}-�1 ��7:`��.��� rom owner
(�YL: i.wlf� i �'�!'14.tirli iM! I�isw.Y� a•'J1�.iT��F:���
Namc: %�! � Phone #:
�,: ���-� , i���..�i�Y V ����' � ��3� �ac��
�. _� :_ r
Address ;'��:��'� �•i,# ��s.��s�
City Sta tti i)}i y(jt ! s( tt (
fiJt3il}t}flifFtil/Sf3311/3�1i1��14flliil��itllfl�lE
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that no order of the City to repair, correct or improve any part of this building or any
d�velling unit therein or pertaining to the operation thereof has been issued, or is presently outstanding
wl�icl� has not been fully complied with, to the complete satisfaction of any and all inspection officers of the
City, to the best of my knowledge, except as follows: !
Si�r►ature: � ���-�/L- �Z ` �4 �--�_
LICENSE FEE
No. of Rental Units Fee PLEASE NOTE IF OVER 12 UNITS:
1 �12.00 "Section 220.09 requires owners of buildings with
2 $24.00 more than 12 units to contract for recycling services.
3-7 �36.00 Please attach a copy of your contraet for recyeling
8-12 $49.00 services to this application. Failure to do this may
Over 12 $49.00 +$2 for each unit over 12. result in the denial of this application."
Please r�ote: Section 11.11: The penalty for late payment of all license fees as showin in Section 11.10 of
the (:it�� Code shall be 25% of the amount of the fee if received from 1 to 7 days late. If the payment is
recei��ed more than 7 days after it is due, the penalty shall be 50% of the fee.
�x*�*��x�x��x��x��x�x�x�xx��xx�*�x�x�x*�x�x�x**x��x�xx�x��x�x�x�x��x�x��x�*x��*x���x��x*x�x�x���xx��x�*x�x��:�:****�:*******�x*�*�**�x�x��
For City Use Only:
dpproved Denied Date Authorized Signature
Zoni ri ;
Fire Dep�
c;�y co,,,���r
17A
�
_
Cl� �F
FRiDLEY
FRtDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E_ FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(6�21 57 1-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287
Septembex 2, 1993
Zbm Olin
25820 University Avenue N.W.
Isanti, Mtd 55040
De,ar Mr. Olin:
'Ihe City of PYidley has received Your' aPPlication for op�xation of rental lice�.se
property at 541 - 53 1/2 Avenue N.E. As you are aw'are� �'i�-ey City C�oc�e 220
requires that a li�se be obtained for all rental proPertY in the City.
Iast year, I sent you a letter (copy enclosed) co��! oP�dtion of these
rental units. At that time, I reminded you that tiv-S P� �t be brought
into conformanoe with the FYidley Zoning dode by May 6, 1994. Specifically. You
must oca��ly with the followi.ng two items by that time:
1. There mu.st be no more than fi�e �lated Peo��le �i���g i� -t�e
residei�.
2. one or more pexsons living in the residenoe must have ac�cess to the
entire structure.
Zhe City Council will consider your rental license application at its September
13, 1993, meeting. I am reconunending that the Cou�cil appr�e y� ��-
license only through P�1ay 6, 1994. Since this cavers a Pe.�'iod of only eight
months,. the City would refurid one-thi�i ($8.00) of your rental lic�tise fee-
You are welcon� to attend the September 13 , 1993 , City Council meeting to ��5
any conc�xzls you may have regarding consideration of your rental license
application. The me�ting will begin at 7:30 p.m. at t�he �idley Miuiicipal Center
(6431 University Avenue N.E.).
Ple.ase call me at 572-3595 if you have questions or wish to discuss th�s fur�h�''
Sincerely,
steven Barg
Planning Assistant
SB:ls
M-93-212
,r.-J
�--�7 3 �
City of Fridley, 1Vlinnesota
c/o Fridley Fire Dept.
64�31 University Ave. NE
Fridley, MN 55432
(612)572-3612
LICENSE APPLICAT[ON FOR RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROPERTY
�'� Tf-IE CI"I'Y COUNCIL OF FRIDLEY MINNESOTA: The undersigned hereby makes appiication to Iicense a residential
dweilin� iu ticcordance with Chapter 220 of the City Code of Fridley. _
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION:
Buildi��� Address: 4042 Main Street NE No. of Units: 2 Lic. Fee: 24.00
Owner's 1Vame: David Menken,
Fuller
Owner's Address: 375 Belmont Lane E.
City St�fe Zi
Name:
Address:
City Siate Zi
lewood, MN 55117
Paul Gaydos, Susan
BUILDING MANAGER OR AGENT (if different from
TIO
Phone #: 774-9952
Phone #:
I l�ereby certify that no order of the City to repair, correct or improve any part of this building or any
dwelli�ig unit therein or pertaining to the operation thereof has been issued, or is presently outstanding
which l�as not been fully complied with, to the complete satisfaction of any and all inspection of�cers of the
City, to tlie bes�y kno�vledge, exc�t as follows:
�i��at
�
No. oC Rental Units Fee
1 �12.0�
2 $24.00
3-7 $36.00
8-12 $49.00
Over 1'2 $49.00 +$2 for each unit over 12
PLEASE NOTE IF OVER 12 UNI"I'S:
"Section 220.n9 :equires os.>ners of buildings with
more than 12 units to contraet for recycling serv'sces.
Please attach a copy of your contract for recycling
services to this application. Failure to do this may
result in the denial of this applieation."
Please note: Section 11.11: The penalty for late payment of all license fees as showin in Section 11.10 of
the City Code shall be 25% of the amount of the fee if received from 1 to 7 days late. If tlie payment is
received itiore than 7 days after it is due, the penalty shall be SO% of the fee.
�x�x�x*�x*�*M�x����x*�x�x**�*�x�*��x�xx�**�x*�x***��x�x*�x�x���x****�x*****�x*�x*�x�x*�x**�*�x*�x*�**�x**�x�x****�x�*****
For City Use Only:
-�pproved Derzied Date
Zoning
Fire Dep�
City Council
Authorized Signature
:
_
C�� �F
FRi DLEY
FRIDLEY MUNIC(PAL CENTER • G431 UN(VERSITY AVE_ N.E. FRIDLEY, MN SSa32 •(6121571-34>0 • FAX (612) 571-1287
September 2, 1993
David arr_i Rebeoc'.a Men�n
Paul Gaydos and S�isan FLtller
375 Belm�nt I�ne .East
Maplewood, MN 55117
�- � ..- • -
'Ihe City of Fridley has received your application for operati-on of rental 3.ioense
property at 4042 Main Street N.E. As you are aware� F�'idley City Cod2 220
L-�equires th,at a lic�se be obtained for all rental proPert-Y in the City.
Iast year, I sent you a letter (copy enclos�d) conoen�irKJ operation of these
rental �its. At that time, I�ed you that this properti-Y m�st be braue�lt
into oonformar�ce with the FYidley Zoning Oode by May 6, 1994. S�cificaliy, y�
must oo�ly with the follawing two items by that time:
l. There must be no more� than five unrelated people living in the
residenc�.
2. One or more persons livi.rig in the residence must have access to the
entire structure-
`Iiie City Council will consider your rental license application at its Sept�nbe,r
13 , 1993 , meetirig. I am reconmier�ding t1�at the Cou��ci1 aPP�e your rental
license only through May 6, i994. Since this cavers a Pe.r'i°d of only� eic�t
months, the City would refund one-thisd ($8-��) of your rental lioense fee.
You are wel� to attexxi the September 13 , 1993 , City Qouncil meeting to express
any con��s you may have rega�ling consideration of your rental. licer�se
application_ The meeting will b�in at 7:30 p.m. at the �idley M�uiicipal Cen�er
(6431 University Avenue N.E.).
Pleas� cal-1 me at 572-3595 if you have questions or wish to discuss th�-S fu�th�''
Sincerely,
Steven B��g
Planning Assistant
SB: ls
M-93-212
: �,
CITY OF FRIDLEY
MEMORANDOM
,,�,a�
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER fi:"`
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSOLIDATION OF THE
FRIDLEY POLICE RELIEF ASSOCIATION'S POLICE PENSION
DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1993
The Fridley Police Relief Association is seeking approval to consolidate their Police
Pension Association with the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA).
As a result, we would like to establish a public hearing for the consolidation of police
pension on Monday, September 27, 1993.
19
i �.
TO:
FROM:
SIIBJECT:
DATE:
WILLIAM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER ��
RICHARD D. PRIBYL� FINANCL DIRECTOR
PAIIL 8. HANSEN, STAFF ACCOIINTANT
1994 BIIDGET PIIBLIC HEARING DATE
Beptember 2, 1993
Minnesota Statute requires local governments to
hearings on their budgets. The public hearing dates
to be set and certified to the County by September
required to hold the hearings between November 29 and
The continuation hearing must be at least 5 but no
days after the initial hearing.
hold public
are required
15. We are
December 20.
more than 14
We have attached a letter from the Anoka County Auditor informing
us of the Public Hearing dates the County and the School Districts
have set for their budgets.
We recommend Council set December 1 as the Public Hearing date on
the 1994 Budget and December 13 as the reconvening date if one is
needed and the subsequent hearing on December 20. If the
reconvening date is not needed �ae will move the subsequent hearing
to December 13. The League of Minnesota Cities said it would be
legal to hold a subsequent hearing on December 20.
We can not hold a meeting in November because on the two available
days, November 29 and 30, the� Metropolitan Agencies and School
Districts hold their public hearing meetings respectively.
In order to hold the continuation and subsequent hearings on
regular scheduled council meeting dates the only dates available
for the public hearing are December 1 through December 3.
Realistically that leaves Wednesday and Thursday and we chose
Wednesday December 1.
RDP/ph
Attachments
zo
�
_?o�;'�o��._
:.
P -•'�.�..�[[ _
n,, �
•\�L.
M�hhE504p
August 18, 1993
RiIG � � i993
�OUNTY C�� ANOKA
�
DIVISION OF PROPERTY RECORDS AND TAXATION
Edward M. Treska, Division Manager
GOVERNMENT CENTER • 2100-3RD AVENUE • ANOKA, MN 55303
The Honorable, William Nee
Mayor of Fridley
6431 University Ave NE
Fridley, MN 55432
Dear Mayor Nee:
The Truth in Taxation law, M.S. 275.U65 requires cii:ies to
hold a public budget hearing for property taxes payable in
the year 1994. The dates for this hearing cannot conflict
with the public hearing and continuation dates set by the
county, metropolitan agencies or the school districts
located in your city. These hearings must be held between
November 29 and December 20. The continuation hearing must
be at least 5 but no more than 14 business days after your
initial hearing. The following taxing districts within your
city have set the following hearing dates:
TAXING
DISTRICT
✓Anoka County..........
✓�Ietropolitan agencies.
✓School District #11...
✓School District #13...
''School District #14...
�School District #16...
HEARING
DATE
....December
....November
....November
....November
....November
....November
RECONVENTNG
DATE
14.......December 20
29.......December 6
30.......December 7
30.......December 7
30.......December 7
30.......December 7
With this information you can now set the initial date for
your public hearing and a date for recommencing the meeting,
if necessary. In addition, the time and location of the
initial meeting, the phone number an interested taxpayer may
call and your payable 1994 certified proposed property tax
levy is due on or before September 15, 1993. I have
enclosed a certification form for your convenience.
If you have any questions concerning the Truth in Taxation
process, please contact me at 323-5438.
Sincer ly,__. _ �\
\ � ; ._ ��
` _�- ` �t,c,�t.,,
Di k Sivanich
Innerdepartmental Accountant
Affirmative Action�efj� Opportunity Employer
Nov�r�%�:r, 1���
.. . .. .. -. .. .. .. . ..
. �
,; , �j� ,.;::, ,;:>� ,; � ,- ;-
�����! A000000.1=11 �t^11 �L^11 �. 1�1i �l^�!
� <� -i..� r..� <i.�� r :� �i.�� r :� �i. �� r:.� �i..� r..� -i.��
�� � � � �� � �� � � � � �
1.���1 1'��i �'��.1 Il��l I'��I I'��I
: . ,
.�L},..GOCOGOGI'1�::• �J�t �•�•�l .�1•�:�• �',�::� �'��,1
♦�l Li�! L;11f 1;11,t 1�1,! 1;11I i��l
��..� �i.�� ��..� �i.�� r..,� �i.�� r..�; i.��� ��..� �i.��� r..� �i.�� r..� �i.�'�
!1 � �I 11 � �I !� � �I I! � �I l.� � �� 1f � �I �j � �13
, , ; , ,.
f�1.1 �!�^:�� �f�:.t �r�^:;L �fr^�t �'��'` .AGOd000.`���t
���l l��l �a000000lti)�r ta1,r ia1,r i��r l±rr
��..�;i.��� ��..iri..,� �r..�,i.�� ��..��i.�� ���.�,i_.,� �r..��i.��� �r..��a.��
�f � �� I� � �I l.j � �I I� � �l l.� � �1 l.� � �I !� � �1
, :
�:::, ;-:, ,:;>, ,:;::, ,:-:. �:;::, ,;::.
�er �l^'•i ��_ir �Hii �t^:'r ���'•i ,�li:i
�r..��.a►.�� �r..�-i.�� �f:.��i.�� ��..�<�..�� �►:.�<i..� ��.;��i.�� ��..i.�i.��
l.� .� �l l.j � �i l.� � �l I� � �1 f� � �1 Il � ll 1j � '1
: . ,
.��:�
�1 . . . _ . .
�►..� �....� - - �
l,f � • .`- '-
�:
�
Sunday
�;�_;
j.■,i.���
' � �
��; :t
L�1!
► .l.�.l.•J
��j� ���
�
•
.��::;�
.�_„
�/..I.�.�.ti 1�
l� � 1�
�
r::;�
.��.,,
�F..l `.�•ti ��
l.� � �1
����r�l�er, 1�'��
Manday Tuesday �+ednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
� �********** �**::****** 4
Possible Possible
Public Public
Initial Public Hearinp Hearin�
Hearin� Datie Da�e ��� ,.;; �
�
Metropolit,an
Apencies
Reconvenin�
DaLe
%
School Dis-
t,rict's Re-
convenin�
pate
t�
�ont,inuation 14 ��
Hearin�
Cif Neces- public Hear-
sary) �n� fbr Anoka
If not: Coun�y
Subsequent
Hearinp
Fridley's
Subsequent
Hearin�
CAnoka Coun-
ties Recon-
veninp Date)
-,t
�i.:,
�..1.�1.•�
��� L��
�
,; �
�",,
$�_'!'�-� �
�� ���
:
.�r;.,
.,:.:f
1:.1 •�., �
i� �. �i
�l;i�l
�r..i�i.��
I�- � �1
.�,;;,
' =''
/../ ��.��
1!� � �1
•
,:.,
.��^„
f .r �l.•�
��i ���
�
s******�***Is***s***s**I
� �� ��
�tii1,f
��:.��i.��
i���l
.
�r'1 :�
L�1f
r..f.�i.��
��r � ���
.;:,
��^:,
�►"�.`�''��,
!j � �1
1
��:�
,�t.,,
�I..1: �.� �
I� � �1
����$�,(,� ,; �
+0006JOOlLi1t
�r,.�;�.���
l� � �i
�1'� �l
1�1!
r..�.�i.��
��� � ���
.
�,.:.,
,::.�
f .l:�l.�i
��� til�
�rr
��::�
'_,�
►..! �l.•�
��l til�
�
:
�1111
o��o� .
�'�;i.��
��� � �l�
f� :l
�L^1f
r .�.�i.��
�rr til�
�
i ::�
.a�.ti..•�
F..l.�l.� �
!' �-'l
Note: The subsequen� hearing date
can �e the s�m� as the �c�unty's
reconvenin� d�te
2oc
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��� .
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYI., FINANCE DIREGTOR
PAUL S. HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING A"PROPOSED" BUDGET FOR THE
F�SCAL YEAR 1994
DATE: September 8, 1993
In conformance with Chapter 275, Section 065 of the Minnesota Statutes, attached is the
"proposed" 1994 Preliminary Draft Budget
Chapter 275 requires the City to certify a"proposed" budget to the County Auditor prior
to September 15.
We request the City Council pass the attached resolution and adopt the 1994 "Proposed"
Budget.
RDP/ph
Attachment
2�
RESOLUTION NO. - 1993
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A"PROPOSED" BUDGET
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1994
WHEREAS, Chapter 7, Section 7.04 of the City Charter provides that the City Manager shal! prepare an
annual budget; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Statutes requires that the City shall adopt a proposed
budget before September 15; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Statutes requires that such "proposed" budget be
certified to the County Auditor;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following "proposed" budget be adopted and approved:
GENERAL FUND
Taxes and Special Assessments:
Current Ad Valorem
Deli�quent, Penalties,
Forfeited
Special Assessments
Licenses and Permits:
Licenses
Permits
I ntergovernmental:
Federal
State -
Homestead a�d Agriculture
Credit Aid
�ocal Govemment Aid
All Other
Charges for Services
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Storm Water Fund
Liquor Fund
Cable TV Fund
Construction Fu�ds
Fines and Forfeits
Interest on Investments
Miscellaneous Revenues
Other Financing Sources:
Employee Benefd Fund
Closed Debt Service Fund
TOTAL REVENUES AWD OTHER
FINANCING SOURCES
Fund Balance:
General Fund Reserve
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
1994 DRAFT BUDGET RESOLU110N
ESTIMATED
REVENUE
$3.531.569
66,547
1,896
132,270
288,356
5,803
1,015,042
1,558,917
432,532
313,676
174,376
125.195
90,854
28,969
65,397
19,849
31,129
242,392
430,000
96,886
200,000
248,414
9,100,069
239,655
$9.339.724
21A
Legislative:
City Council
Planning Comm'issions
Other Commissions
City Managemerrt:
General Management
Peisonnel
Legal
Finance:
Eledions
Accounting
Assessing
MIS
City Clerk/Records
Police:
PoC�ce
Civil Defense
Fire:
Public Works:
Civic Center
Technical Engineering
Traffic Engineering
Street Lighting
Public Works Maintenance
Recreation:
Recreation
Naturalist
Community Development:
Building Inspection
Planning
Reserve:
Eme�gency
No�departmental:
APPROPRIATIONS
$92,892
3,523
7,099
305,814
90,884
160,000
29,801
483,624
167,347
144,409
• 95,468
3,057,836
8,784
742,508
192,207
442,608
80,545
144,700
1,594,180
559,825
243,608
195,906
255,455
185,000
55,701
$9.339.724
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Cable N Fund g� � �,47�
Grant Management Fund 189,454
Solid Waste Abatement Fund 218,056
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS $518.985
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Capital Improvement Fund
Taxes — Current Ad Valorem
Interest on Investments
Donations
State Aid Construction
Fund Balance
TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
AGENCY FUND
Six Cities Watershed Fund
Taxes — Current Ad Valorem
TOTAL AGENCY FUND
rC�Yr_i�
$85,550
418,672
10,000
600,000
453,778
a� ,ss8,000
$3,500
53,500
$11,430,209
General Capital Improvement
Streets Capitat Improvement
Parks Capital Imp�ovement
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
SEPTEMBER, 1993
ATTEST:
n �.� ■.�. . ..
r :
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAY R
$111.475
189,454
218,056
$518,985
$340,000
1,034.000
194,000
$�,sss,000
$3,500
$3,500
$11,430,209
DAY OF
.
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYI., FINANCE DIRECTOR
PAUL S HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING "PROPOSED" TAX LEVY
REQUIREMENTS FOR 1994 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA
FOR COLLECTION
DATE: September 8, 1993
In conformance with Chapter 275, Section 06$ of the Minnesota Statutes, attached is a
resolution certifying "proposed" t� levy requirements to the Anoka County Auditor.
Chapter 275 requires the City to certify iYs "proposed" tax levy requirements prior to
September 15.
The 1994 "proposed" tax levy of $3,678,665 represents a 0% increase over the 1991 & 1992
levies without taking into consideration the accounting change, required by the new
Minnesota Statute, which requires the HACA amount to be deducted from the budget levy
amount. The 1994 "proposed" ta�c levy actually represents a 22.6% decrease over the 1991
& 1992 levies after deducting the HACA amount.
We request the City Council pass the attached resolution to certify the "proposed" tax levy
requirements.
R DP/sf
Attachment
22
RESaLIITION NO. - 1993
A RESOLIITION CERTIFYING ��PROPOSED�� TA% LEVY
REQIIIREMBNTS FOR 1994 TO THE COIINTY OF ANORA
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Chapter 275, Section 065 requires the
City to certify it's "proposed" tax levy requirements to the County
Auditor;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley certify to
the County Auditor of the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, the
following "proposed" tax levy to be levied in 1993 for the year
1994.
GENERAL FUND
General Fund
CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
Capital Improvement Fund - Parks Division
AGENCY FUND
Six Cities Watershed Management Organization
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
$3,603,266
$ 72,689
$ 2,710
$3,678,665
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
22A
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��.
�
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO THE 1992 BUDGET
DATE: September S, 1993
Attached you will find a resolution amending appropriations to the 1992 Budget in
accordance with the City Charter.
The adjustments listed have arisen as a result of donations, items budgeted in the incorrect
categories, auditor adjushnents, and unforseen expenditures. All ad}ushnents have been
informally approved by you through the Budget Reappropriation Form. We request that
Council approve the amendment of the attached budgets.
RDP/ph
Attachment
a
, t
23
RE90I,�TPI�J I�U. - 1993
•1.7:• I •i • I Y:'� • � M:/� H�ti I •.� •' I• •J �. •• Y:1' N.'il I.'}I• •
11 1� N• : • 11 I� C!' • I• I� N� I�I 11 I� :1' • '1:�i1 1: 1'ti'1� lyi I�
�• �' • I� H� 1: ■ ••1 7i 1•J" 11 I� � �� Y.1" M• • V• / 1•',� •� lyi ^'ll I�
• ' Y:t" 1:+r• •
Wf�REAS, the Goverrnne.nt Fin�nce Offic:ers Association require"s that all line
items within divisions reflect favorable a�t balances in the Annual Report;
and
Wf�REAS, the City of Fridley has iurvolved itself in initiatives that pravide for
future chan�es and modifications that will pravide for a better delivexy of
Se,rviCe, dlld
WI�REA.S, the City of �idley had r�t incorporated these and other necessary
changes into the adopted bixdget for 1992.
NOW, TFIEEtE�RE $E IT RESOLVED, that the Yxadgets of the following clivisions and
funds be amex�ded as follaws:
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
DONATIONS - CffY MANAGER
EMERCENCY RESERVE - ACCOUNTING
EMERCENCY RESERVE - POUCE
DONATION - POLICE
DONATION - POLICE
DONATION - POL�E
DONATION - FIRE
DONATION - FIRE
DONATION - FIRE
DONATION - FIRE
DONATION - FIRE
MtSCELLANEOUS
GRANT - PUBLIC WORKS MAIIJTENANCE
DONATION - RECREATION
DONATION - RECREATION
DONATION - NATURAUST
DONATION - NATURALIST
EMERGENCY RESEHVE - PUBUC WORKS
DONATION - NATURAUST
EMERGENCY RESERVE - PERSONNEL
TOTAL REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
APPR�PRIATION ADJUSTMENTS
CITY MANAGER
PERSONNEL
ACCOUNTING
MtS
GENERALFUND
CAPffAL OUTLAY
PERSONALSERVICES
SUPPUES/CHARGES
SUPPLJES/CHARGES
CAPffAL OUTLAY
PERSONAL SEAVICES
SUPPUES/CHARGES
CAPffAL OUTLAY
CAPffAL OUTLAY
23A
250 FRIDLEY LION'S CLUB
24,800 STUDY OF "CHARGES FOR SERVICES"
2,500 NATIONAL IVIGHT 011T
200 MARY GABRELCIK (FRANKS USED CARS)
300 MINCO PRODUCTS
111 BURGER KING
300 MINCO PRODUCTS
144
5,500 KURT MANUFACTURING
1.208
5250 SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS
575 REIMBURSEMEM CHECK
6,000 DNR
300 FRIDLE1f UON'S C W B
2,137 FRiDLEY WN'S CLUB & FRIDLEY JAYCEES
200 MINCO PRODUCTS
25
4,256 REPAIR BOILER WATER UNE/WORK COMP
200 FRIDLEY STATE BANK
1,970 FOR PERSONALSERVICES
54.226
250 SISTER CfTIES PROGRAM
2,784 YEAR- END ADJUSTMENT
(814)YEAR- END ADJUSTMENT
24,800 STUDY OF "CHARGES FOR SERVICES"
(2,000)TO MIS
29 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT
(29)YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT
3,000 TAPE DRNE UI'GRADE
2,000 MEMORY UPGRADE
. . �y. •��: • 1 •:� �"i
CfTY CI.ERK/RECOROS
- 1993
CAPRAL OUTLAY
POLICE SUPPIIES/CIiARGES
SUPPLJES/qiARGES
SUPPLJES/CHARGES
SUPPUES/CHAAGES
SUPPUESJCFIARGES
PERSONALSERVICES
FIRE
MUNICIPAL CENTER
TECHNICAL ENGINEERING
PUBLJC WORK MAINTENANCE
RECREATION
(3,000)TO MIS
2.500 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT
200 DARE PROGRAM
300 CRIME PREVHJTION FUND
111 CRJME PREVBJfION FUND
2,367 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT
(2.36�YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT
SUPPLJES/CHARGES 300 FlRE PREVENTION EDUCATION
SUPPUES/CHARGES 144
SUPPUES/CHARGES 3,500 REFURB VEHtCLE 3394
SUPPLIES/CHARGES 1.208 COLORING BOOKS
CAPRALOUTIAY 5,250 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EQUIPMENTTRAILER
SUPPUES/CHARGES 575 HAZMATTRAINING
SUPPUES/CHARGES 790 YEAR-ENO ADJUSTMENT
PERSONAL SERVICES (790)YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT
CAPRALOUTLAY 324 FLOOR BUFFER
SUPPUES/CHARGES (324)
PERSONAI SERVICES 827 VIfORKERS COMPENSATION
SUPPUES/CHARGES 3,429 REPAIR BOILER WATER UNE BREAK
SUPPUES/CHARGES
PERSONALSERVICES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
SUPPUES/CHARGES
PERSONALSERVICES
SUPPUES/CHARGES
SUPPIJES/CFIARGES
CAPITALOUTLAY
1.783 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT
(1,783)YEAR-END ADJUSTTAENT
8,589 EQUIP DUMP TRUCK #725
(8.589)
2,121 OAK WIIT SUPPRESSION PROGRAM
3,879 OAK WILT SUPPRESSION PRO(iRAM
300'WNCH W(TH SANTA" EVENT
2,137 FLOOR MATTING MOORE LAKE BEACH WARM HOUSE
NATURALIST SUPPUES/CFIARGES 200 NATURE CENTER PROGRAMMING
SUPPLIESJCHARGES 25 NATURE CENTER PROGRAMMING
SUPPUES/CHARGES 200 COOKING DEMONSTRATIONS
NONDEPARTMENTAL PERSONALSERVICES 9 YEAR-END ADJUSTMENT
SUPPUESJCHARGES (9)YEAR-END AOJUSTMENT
TOTAL APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 54,226
APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
CABLE N FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES 18,619 RECLASSIFICATION
OTHER FINANCING USES (18,619)RECLASSIFICATION
0
GRANT MANAGEMENT FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL 250,000 MCGLYNN'S GRANT
SUPPUES/CHARGES 250,000 MCGLYNN'S GRANT
HRA REIMBURSHv1ENT FUNO
ItYTERGOVERNMENTAL 49,938 UNBUDGETED ACTNffY
SUPPUES/CHARGES 49,938 UNBUDGETED ACTNtTY
23B
P21GE 3- RE80LjTt'I�T I�A. - 1993
Oi�1G AND GAMBUNG FORFEITURE FUND
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS
FINES AND FORFEITS 11,375
APPR�PRIATION ADJUSTMENTS
SUPPUES�CHARGES 7,933
APPR�PRIATION ADJUSTMENTS
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNOS
TRANSFERS OUT 19,590 TO CORRECT ERROR IN TRANSFER TO HRA
SUPPUES/CIiARGES 23,707 IXPENDITURES IN IXCESS OF BUDGET
CAPtTAL OUTLAY (43,29�
0
•• 81► • f � N' Y�1� : � 1 M ��' N� • 1 I i ' Il � � �• �
�i' � I'1�1'
f�-
r /• I ` • M �I •� /
WIIS,I�M J. NEE - NJAYOR
23C
TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��.
�
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
HOWARD D. KOOLICK, ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: DESIGNATIONS OF 1992 FUND BALANCES
DATE: September 8, 1993
In accordance with City policy and generally accepted accounting principies portions of the
1992 fund balance are shown as being designated in the Comprehensive Annual Financial.
Report. A designation of fund balance is used to show the intended uses of resources in a
future period. The amounts shown are not legally binding upon the City.
Designations were recorded in the General Fund, Speciat Revenue Funds and,the Capital
Improvements Fund. The General Fund designations were set up according to the guidelines
contained in Resolution number 46-1991, a copy of which is attached. The designations in all
other funds were based on generally accepted accounting principles.
The following designations are used by the City:
Designated for WorkinA Capital - Represents the funds needed to finance general fund
operations until the first property tax collection in June.
Desiqnated for Subsequent Years' Expenditures - Represents the portion of 1992 fund balance
that is budgeted for use in 1993.
Desiqnated for Continqencies - Represents funds available for unforeseen emergencies.
Designated for Replacement of Fixed Assets - Represents funds set aside for the future
replacement of capital outlay items.
Designated for Cable N Proqram - Represents funds available in the Cable TV Fund for future
programming and cable N needs.
Designated for Sofid Waste Abatement - Represents the funds available in the Solid Waste
Abatement Fund to finance future operations. The balance in the designation is the
accumulated surplus from past operating activities.
Designated for Druq and Gamblinq Enforcement - Represents the funds available in the Drug
and Gambling Forfeiture Fund for future enforcement. The balance in the designation is the
surplus of funds received less enforcement activities.
Desiqnated for Street Improvements - Represents the funds available in the Capital
Improvements Fund to finance future street improvement projects identified in the Five Year
Capital Improvement Plan.
Desiclnated for Park Improvements - Represents the funds available in the Capital Improvements
Fund to finance future park improvements identified in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan.
24
DESIGNATIONS OF 1992 FUND BALANCES
September 8, 1993
PAGE 2
The portion of the General Fund fund balance in excess of the designations was recorded as
unreserved and undesignated. The entire fund balance in the special revenue fund and the
Capital Improvements Fund are designated.
The attached resolution needs to be passed by Council to formally adopt the 1992 designations.
24A
s.
RE.90I�ION I�. 46 - 1991
RESQLITPION DESIC�iTIlaG I�IINIMtA"i F[R�ID BAI�•S
Wf�E2E'AS , maj or revenue sources of the city' s general fund ar'e received in the
latter part of each fiscal year with disbursemer�ts occurrinq relatively evenly
throughout the year; arid
WHEREAS, this timing difference between cash receipts and cash disbuzse�nents
creates cash flaw deficiencies unless sufficient fund balance levels are
designated to meet the working capital needs in the first half of the year; and
WI�REAS, unfor�Seen reductions in major intergoverrnnental revenues or
unanticipated e.xperraiture needs remain a recurririg threat tA cities; and
W�IIERFAS, establishment of a minim�nn designation of fund balance for such
contingencies would mitigate the adver�.�e effec�ts of aid reductions or
unanticipated experiditur'es: and -
WF�RRF'�AS, anticipated uses of f�uxl balance-s for planned future obligations, should
be disclosed in the annual financial statements by designation of fund balances:
arid
Wf-IERFAS, formal establishment of minitm�n general fund balance levels helps
maintain the city's favorable bond rating which translates into lower borrowinq
costs.
NpW, T�pRE, BE IT R��OLUED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, that
to the extent of available total fund balance, that designations of fund balance
be established at the end of each year in the order set forth as follows:
1. A designation for working capital equallirig 50% of the ensuing year's
� budgeted local government aid plus the property tax levy (including any
state paid portion);
2. A designation for subseguent years' expenditures for uses of fund
balance as set forth in the ensuing year's adopted annual budget;
3. A designation for contirigencies equal to 10% of the general fund
budgeted expenditu.res and other financing uses for the ensuing year;
4. A designation for replacement of fixed assets in an amount not less
than 5% of the General FUnd irrvest�nent in General Fixed Assets as
identified in the Camprehensive Annual Financial Report.
PASSED AND ADOP'1'ED BY 7� CIZ'Y OOUNCIL OF 7� CI'I'Y OF FRIDLEX Z�IIS 20Tfi DAY OF
MAY, 1991. ,
C/ V
WILLTAM J. NEE - YOR
ATl'ES'I':
, ��_
SHIRT �.v A. AIA - C CL�',RK
_. �
RESOLUTION NO. - 1993
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING 1992 FUND BALANCES
WHEREAS, designating a portion of fund balance is recognized as the proper format for
reporting anticipated fut�re uses oi fund balance; and
WHEREAS, designations of fund balance are also appropriate as a means of mitigating the
adverse effects of either reductions in major revenue sources or unanticipated expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 46 -1991 which established minimum
designations of fund balance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, that the 1992
fund balance designations are as follows:
GENERAL FUND
Designated for Working Capital
Designated for Subsequent Years' Expenditures
Designated for Contingencies
Designated for Replacement of Fixed Assets
CABLE TV FUND
Designated for Cable N Program
Designated for Subsequent Years' Expenditures
SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT FUND
Designated for Solid Waste Abatement
DRUG & GAMBLING FORFEITURE FUND
Designated for Drug and Gambling Enforcement
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
Designated for Street Improvements
Designated for Park Improvements
Designated for Replacement of Fixed Assets
$3,029,348
$308,160
$908,366
$1,423,584
$118,243
$3, 293
$37, 648
$14,960
$5,442,419
$934,493
$1,798,084
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 13TH DAY
OF SEPTEMBER, 1993.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. HAMPA - ITY LERK
24C
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAY R
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
MEMO TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS,
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MA,ATAGER �
��
CHUCK MCKUSICK, CHIEF �
August 13, 1993
FIRE TRAINING SITE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
Subject agreement was revised per your earlier direction and
submitted to each of the parties for signature. I am advised by
Chief Ron Fagerstrom that he is submitting it to the Spring Lake
Park, Blaine and Mounds View city councils for approval. I
anticipate receiving the Brooklyn Center approval soon, since that
Council approved funding just a few weeks ago.
Would you submit Fridley's copy of the agreement (enclosed) for
action by our Council. As previously noted, the principle change
is the deletion of Columbia Heights from the Joint Powers
Agreement.
AMENDMENT OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF FIRE TRAINING SITE
WHEREAS, the parties who are signators below had entered an
agreement titled "Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training
Association", a copy of which is attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the only expenditure of funds to date pursuant to
said agreement has been by the City of Fridley; and
WHEREAS, a party to the agreement, the City of Columbia
Heights, has given written notice to the other parties via letter
dated August 10, 1992, that it no longer wishes to participate in
the agreement; and
WHEREAS, the remaining parties desire to amend said agreement
in order to continue the project of constructing and operating a
fire training site;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties agree to the following
modifications of the agreement:
1. Deletion of Columbia Heights:
Delete from the "Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training
Association" (copy attached, and hereafter called the
AGREEMENT), the City of Columbia Heights, wherever that name
appears, and change the number of "member departments" from
four to three wherever stated. The undersigned hereby
acknowledge receipt of a termination notice from the City of
Columbia Heights by letter dated August 10, 1992 from its
attorney Greggory J. Woods, and accept the termination in
accordance with paragraph 16 of the AGREEMENT. There exists
no claim against Columbia Heights for proportionate share of
initial construction costs or operating costs.
2. Initial Construction:
The "initial construction costs" identified in paragraph 6 of
the AGREEMENT shall be changed to $150,000, it being
understood that the parties may later increase this amount
if additional contributions are approved by the parties'
respective governing bodies.
25A
PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES
3. Operating Budget:
. The statement in paragraph 7 of the AGREEMENT citing the 1991
Operating Budget is deleted.
4. Amendment:
The AGREEMENT amendment procedure shall require unanimous
approval of the parties, in lieu of majority approval,
reflecting the existence of three rather than four parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned approve these amendments
by authority of their duly authorized governing bodies on the date
of their signature below.
CITY OF FRIDLEY
By —
Title
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
By —
Title
Date
Date
SPRING LAKE PARK, BLAINE, MOUNDS VIEW FIRE DEPT., INC.
BY —
Title
DIR: C:\WP\TRAIN.2
. 25B
Date
Engineering
y Sewer
F Y Water
Q�
� O Parks
O 3 Streets
VU Maintenance
W —�
� m
�a
�
� MEMORANDUM
TO: Wiiliam W. Burns, City Manager ��
� PW93-332
FROM: John G. Flora, �ublic Works Director
DATE: September 2, 1993
SU&IECT: Stinson Boulevard Improvement
We received a petition from residents on Stinson Blvd between 73rd Avenue and Osborne Road.
Of the 18 residents, 16 (89%) signed the petition in favor of improving the street, installing
concrete curb and gutter and assessing the properties for an amount not-to-exceed $8.00 per
front foot for the concrete curb and gutter.
Also included in the petition was the width of the rebuilt street. Ten of the 16 (63%) support
building the street to 38 feet wide with parking on both sides. ,
Mounds View is also processing a petition with residents on their side of the street. It is
expected that they will also receive a favorable response so that this project can be incorporated
into our 1994 street improvement program.
Recommend the City Council receive the petition. When Mounds View has received their
petition, we will attempt to schedule the project with the Ramsey County Engineer to design so
that public hearings and project advertisement can be accomplished in early 1994.
JGF: cz
Attachment
26
'
CIfYOF
FRIDLEY
i��
STREET IMPROVEMENT PETfT10N
We the residents on Stinson Boulevard petition the City to improve our street with asphalt surface and
concrete curb and gutter. We understand that we will be assessed for the concrete curb and gutter
for a cos# not to exceed $8,00 per front foot.
We also understand that the width of the street will be determined by the majority opinion based on
parking on one side or both sides of the street.
PARKING
ADDRESS SIGNATURE ONE SIDE 3 BOTH
SIDES
FR MV ,��i
Edward Viesselman
?610 Stinson Blvd �
Fridley MN 55432
Earl \Nelle
7624 Stinson Blvd �� �
Fridley MN 55432
Ro.�ert Hend�:� sen
7600 Stinsor; Blvd �� � �
Fridley MN 55432
Terry Closson
7584 Stinson Blvd c��'`��''`r�-
r=ridley MN 554�2
Ly��i I L, a b
7
Frid
Ronald Dufault �
7566 Stinson Blvd , • _ �
Fridley NIN 55432 � ,J4 . •
Ronald Murray
7500 Stinson Blvd _
Fridl2y MN 55432
Anthony Roame
7376 Stinson �Blvd --- J�
Fridlay MN 554�2 ( ��"'�--- / �
��.,`a �� �(�)���J
� ���z os Bo�.� �.D
�,D�Ey nn� 55y�3�
� (�k�C��..D SUfl(?�21 P� 3z / �Dt4a UJA�%
�.�
PARKING
ADDRESS SIGNATURE ONE SIDE ,3� � BOTH
SIDES
FR MV 3�/
�6�n t � c,��j
7360 Stinson Bivd � �
Fridley MN 55432
Robert Bertram
7340 Stinson Bivd ��=(/ _
Fridley MN 55432 /
John Hildreth
7490 Stinsen Blvd
Fridley MN 55�32
John Collodora � � ����
747� Stinson Blvd � x
Fridley UIV 55432
Larry Pearson � ��
7450 Stinson Blvd �
, �
Fridley MN 55432 - --� a, 1 �
, ,�
Mic��ael Miles �' i
I7436 Stinson Blvd
Fridley MN 55432 `
;
� � Orton
7418 Stinson Blvd �
Fridley MN 55432 _� �. �i�-�-�
Joseph Daml ��
7400 Stinson 81vd
Fridley P11N 55432
Marlin Mii!er - ✓�/.�.� i��
7540 Stinson Blvd •
Fridley ti"P: 55432 -
-�3S5tLi�iit ,�rr��`�c� �
7528 Stinson Blvd �
Fridley MN 55432 ��� -�t �:�-��'
Bruce Fyksen
7518 Stinson Blti��! �
Fridley MN 55432 ,
�j,� �-,�.liz� � S'�PPm/Z �i' -3 � -f- 2a.a-�{ �i�2lG...�f F�� �-�y s, :G
,/� � .� 7.� 2d �-�e ��
2 �d�l� y� 26B
Eng�neer�ng
Sewer
L'VTier
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager
G
FROM: John G. F1ora,rPublic Works Director
DATE: September 13, 1993
SUBJECT: Hathaway Lane Improvement Project
PW93-334
We received a petition from the residents on Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive: These
11 residents have petitioned the City to request that their street be upgraded with concrete
curb and gutter, that they be assessed for the concrete curb and gutter at a cost not-to-
exceed $8.00 per front foot, that the assessment would e�ctend over a 10-year period, and
they also waived the requirement for notice of a public hearing so that the project can be
incorporated into the Regis Drive work that is now being accomplished.
Recommend the City Council receive the petition from the residents on Hathaway Lane.
Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolutions calling for the final plans
and specifications and receiving the final plans and specifications.
Recommend the City Council approve the addition of this work into the ST 1993-1&2 Street
Improvement Project as Change Order No. 1.
JGF:cz
Attachments
27
,r
.
,. ;
_ -•J � r(-anu� --
� ovER- HATHAWAY
KENNn�lp,y 'Y
68t� AvE�L�
-� V .
0 Q N O I {.r:�`
N � N � �~'�7�
0 9 �,vE_Q_F��, �
�� 66th AVE.
Churcr. �,_ �,t•:�•:t
MtSSISSIPPI '�rn �~� �
-. JZ o BENNETT � �R. p
�
-FOURMI ES � Z o o � X 6� t n
� ,;-; � . . z
.' n_. W S t� tn � U
!) Z �
?, ��„ ,; ` i a w � o � w
DRxN,E_ _ i 3 u. � Q � w
63ra r��= ��' AVE. N.E. °0 m
:_.--1 ; � w ; '' ` z a
.,,/ .'7' ., . . Q
, 47 ,
_ � _ o � �p�`'
_,_ a; v� W Q o t�
:�_.1 �"I - _ V
Z h . , :
�61sf AVE. N.E. �l►
:,r:. ,..
7
�
Q z � r- :- N - Moc
H � � �
F: ` '.-
Z N __' ; .^;
O°
v' � � z �`: '�.`-�,�o o . Lai
} N O _ .� � :
N59t � �:: ; , 0 59th� ......_.......�
¢ N. E. Z ' � �
j Q � ..jN � GOL�
� � � 3 AVE T�R. (,9�'
� � th F
� r� .n r----,�
�nnn - __ _____,_�___..�_
_ I Sondy
Loke � 23 � 2
J '\
Q ti�
�
h-
w th AVE.
U
I� �
i--
� � 68th
IMPROVEMENT � J� �'' ` "';'"`�'
.� ��r II�Li. / ' �^f
�bbiO AYt.% � 66 th ul
K � I
CREEK PP'� a Q Y I
�,Q" � z � �
sr. a a . � �
�
DA NA CT.
64th AVE. N. E. �
7�
CAMEL OT `�' L
6 RICE CREEK �
53rd ~ ai AVE.
w Q Z �
v Z
�
w = Z �
N. E. m J..,..:►-
� ��"<< "rF � ac cL��:�
GLAC�ER y � � o;;�
'4cFk;::•� •� R.
�� �: :
� N �'.. . .
F �
G O I �__ 'Q i
STRE�T RECONSTRUCTION PETITION
HATHAWAY DRIVE
� We the residents residing on Hathaway Drive east of Regis Drive, petition the City of Fridley to reconstruct our��-- -
street. We understand the City would finance the asphalt curb removal, utility replacement and repair, new,_:: ���
�--- �-_-- asphalt surface; driveway reconnections and baulevard restoration. We understand that we will be _assessed_,:: ���_
-�- -- � for the concGete curb and gutter-�-on -a= front��-foot basis at a cost not-to-ezceed $8.00 per front foot :Ihis�: -
assessment can be spread over 10 .years. � y��.
We desire this improvement and request the City expedite this project and waive our rights to a public hearing
for this improvement.
<:::>:.>:::<:::.>:.:_:: _ ::; :.:::::::::::.; �<::>::>>::»>:;:»»>:;<:>::;::::»;:;:::::.�>:::::>::;»:>.::::.::;»::>;>:::
_ ::>:«::;;:;: >::;:::.: � : :::: >;.:: . . ...... . . ... .
; ::>:::::::>:>:::::;>: ..:>:><�::::::>::::.:::::>:::::><:;::::::: 'GNATEIRE..«:::::>::<:�:<>:::{:`::':::::::>:>:<:>:_::`::::::<::<`:<:::::�>:::::�:>:::::<::»>:<:::<�
;:,:,....:..:: < :: .::.::. :.::R�S1�EI�tT..::>:>:>:::::::::>:::>:;.:::::::::::::::.::.:; ... ::: :.: _ ............ _. .......... ..:...:..:::::::::. :..�:SI. . .. _... . .... ...................: ::::::.:::.:.::.:::::::::::::::::.::.::::::::..
Orthodox Church �
1201 Hathaway Ln -.• �' I� a,,,��
/:;I!� '�v 'J � . � • I-•
Fridley MN 55432 -
James lacono � 1�3 ���(S ��. �
1217 Hathaway Ln ? .,,_ �� �
Fridley MN 55432 � � j �'�3 •
Doyle Mullin � - , ��,� ' �
1233 Hathaway Ln --.� ,;L; ;' ,.' - ''
Fridley MN 55432 ' , � � �� �
Roger Senstegard ,� " '��' �
1249 Hathaway Ln �,-�, � . ;� �,,� ; �i���✓l .` .
Fridley MN 55432 - �
�
James Wolfe � I
1265 Hathaway Ln ���,'r� r�:�� ;�" ' i�� , � �v� � ,;; i � -
Fridley MN 55432 � �� �/ �� � �; .� •
Orville Sachs '
1281 Hathaway Ln � �
Fridley MN 55432
Michael Welsh
1202 Hathaway Ln �, � i � � y/;� ,�Gl��'L - , ' � .
Fridley MN 55432
Phillip Vennewitz � \� '
�
1232 Hathaway Ln � -
Fridley MN 55432
Dwaine Overby
1248 Hathaway Ln � � ; - �'� ; a � /��f ,� „ _
Fridley MN 55432 � �_��- r
Stuart Thompson r- � �7 , �
1264 Hathaway Ln _ ���x- ��� / �-,(.,.
Fridley MN 55432 _ . �; `.� ;;
William Drigans ,�,1 � -----
1280 Hathaway Ln �'� ' "-, `�� �, � � ° ' l� � � _:�
Fridley MN 55432 ^"/
27B
RE9pLUTIO�T �. — 1993
�•�• • ••��• � � i••.••a� i�+ ° � n • ti • i� a�. � r• •
•�� ��• a• • i� � i� u � • �+ � 1• •,• �+ ia� • •,• a •
W�, a petition was received from the residents on Hat�iaway Iane east of Regis Drive,
arid
WF�REAS, their petition requests that their street be upgraded to include concrete curb
and gutter, and
W�.S, the petition establishes their agre�nt to an assessment for the concrete curb
and gutter at a cost not-to-exceed $8.00 per front foot to be assessed aver a 10 year
period, and
WF�S, their petition also waives their right for a notice for a public hearing on this
improvement, arid
W�, the City Council has det.exmined a need to reconstruct cextain streets to maintain
them in a safe condition and at a reasonable cost.
NOW, Tf�ORE, BE IT RE.90LVED TF�iT, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka
County, Minnesota, as follaws:
l. That the followirig improvements proposed by Fetition No. _- 1993 are hereby
ordered to be effected arid cc�npleted as soon as reasonably possible, to wit:
Street is�ravements including gradirig, stabilized base, hot mix bit�ious mat,
concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, landsc�.apirig, and other facilities.
2. That the follcxairig street be incorporated in the 1993 Street I�ravemeazt Project No.
ST. 1993-1.
Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive
3. That the work to be perforntied ur�der this project may be performed uricier one or more
contracts as may be deemed advisable upon receipt of bids.
4. That the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, City Hall, Fridley, Minnesota, is
hereby designated as the Eligineer for this i.�ravement. He shall prepare f;r��
plans and specifications for the makirig of such iYtq�rovements.
PASSID APID ADOPi�D BY Tf� CITY DOUNCIL OF � CITY OF FRIDLEY T�IIS 13TH L1AY OF SEPI�IIt,
1993.
: M���
WILLIAM A. CH�IMPA — CITY CL�2K
:
WILLIAM J. 1VEE — MAYOR
RESOLUTI�1 I�U. - 1993
RF�OLUTI�T ORDERII�G I�� A1�ID AP'P�7VAL OF FII�L PL�S AI�ID
ESTIl�TES OF 00.,cT3 T�OF ADID ADDING 't�0 T� 1993 STREE'I'
PkO�TEGT AU. ST. 1993 - 1&2: �Y IAI� F�1ST OF
REGIS DRIVE
Wf�S, Petition No. - 1993 was received frvm 100% of the residents for i�rovement
of Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive, and
WI�A3, Petition No. _- 1993 waived the right for a public heari.ng, and
Wf�REAB, Resolution No. _- 1993 ordered the improvement and final plans and
specifications and estimates of costs and amerided Street Impravement Project No. ST. 1993-
1&2 by adding Hathaway Lane east of Regi.s Drive.
Nl7W, T�ORE, BE IT RE90LVID TI�T, the City Council of the City of Fridley, Anoka
County, Minnesota, as follcsws:
1. That the follawing i�ravements proposed by City Council Resolution No. - 1993
are hereby orrlered to be effected and cc¢�q�leted as soon as reasonably possible, to-
wit:
Street im�rovements, including grading, stabilized base, hot mix bitLnninous mat,
concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer system, landscaping, and other facilities
located as follaws:
iiathaway Iane East of R�egis Drive
That the work irivolved in said impravements as listed above shall hereafter be
desiqned as:
HATt�,�Y I� EASI' OF RF3GIS DRIVE
2. �e plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works D�partm�nt for such
impravements and each of them pu�suant to the Council resolutions heretofore
adopted, a copy of which plans and specifications are hereto attached and made a
part thereof, are hereby appraved ar�d shall be filed with the City Clerk.
The Public Works D�xector shall accordingly include this work with the 1993 Street
Rec.�nstruction Program.
PASSID A1�ID ADOPl'ED BY Tf� CITY OOiJNCIL OF 'I'� CITY OF FRIDLEY 'ii�S 13'l�i I�AY OF SEPTII�IIt,
1993.
WIT�.IAM J . NEE - MAYOR
ATI�r:
� �� ' « s��': �MY � �:.
& 29
Erq+neennc,
Sevre�
4Vaie�
Par�s
Slrec•:s
"1lainter�t�Ce
MEMORANDUM .
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager c�� •
�
FROM: John G. F1ora,TPublic Works Director
Scott Erickson, Asst Public Works Director3�
DATE: September 13, 1993
PW93-333
SUBJECT: Resolutions Ordering Improvements, Final Plans and Approval of Final
Plans for the Reconstruction of 7th Street
The first resolution orders the improvement, final plans and estimates for the reconstruction
of 7th Street.
The second resolurion orders the improvement and approval of the final plans and estunates
thereof.
At the August 16 Council meeting, we conducted a public hearing for the reconstruction of
7th Street from Madison Street to 900 feet west Petitions for the street were received with
62.5% of the residents supporting the project
The st�eet upgrade consists of minor widening, installation of concrete curb and gutter, and
a bituminous overlay. The adjacent property owners wi11 be assessed for the concrete curb
and gutter at a cost not to exceed $8.00 per front foot.
Recommend the City Council approve the attached resolutions ordering the improvement,
final plans and the approval of plans and adding this project to the 1993 Street
Improvement Project No. ST. 1993�1&2.
SE/JGF:cz
Attachments
30
'�
.
,. s
� 66th AVE.
_FOtlRMI ES � z
:�3 r� ;tF�, 4i i �
DR,N E� _,1'' Z 3 uW.
63�a1 � __ ,}'._-
41 '
����
- ►= �
>z, :r v' W - --
F=
� Z y -.' -,?.���
� 61sf.. `�`.,'.-'AVE
7 __
�,; - .y
a Z y v�i
z
`~ o
`� ~ � z
} "' S9t N
�
� N. E. _
W S
> �
2 3
�
A � fh
�� �,�
i
r �
► w�,,,� i�w� �
�
� L� � !
�T.-> �R. Z
N
W Y 64 th
� z �
z
O � W
f O � W
AVE. N. E. °0 m
z Q
> —
7TH STREET IMPROVEMENT
¢uL•,
CREEK Pp'aK a
�P- 1-=- p �
ST a a �
53rd�' t~i� AVE.
W Q 1-' �
U Z
� Q
W
�
l4Q
I I �� � i � i i � ��%`� I.. �- U a J z ,.."<� "'F a � 1ac. ct'�:�
, � I / •.' S2nd � 7 J �- CIER �� �._./ � �'-
Sandy AVE. N. E. m �LA y'�C '� •���
' Lake I 23 2a :' .. '•��� =�� � .
.. -�;_,_ _�,,._�.. s_•� • •': _"_ ''••..
• ::::•�:•_. /Y::: ••. R. :.
� . _._._.� ...,. _..._, _
� ' 26 zs 65 --- r. ----- :-- Q N �
n ~
T30NR24W a �� nn a �
I' �"^ f . ' �/ � �, � � - - Q t
RFSOLUTI�T 1�. - 1993
RE90I�7'rIOTT ORDERII3G ADID APPROVAL OF PI�1V� AI�ID ESTII�Il�'I'ES OF
C�OS7.5 Tf�I2DOF ADID ADDIIJG TO 'I'� 1993 SI�r Il�()VII�NT P1�OJEGT I�U. ST.
1993 - 1& 2: 7TH SZ'REE'P Fii(JM 1�DI90�i STREET TO 900 F�ET WEST
Wt�REAS, Resolution No. 54 - 1993 ordered the preliminaiy plans, specifications and
estimates of the costs thereof for the in�ravements in this project, and
W�S, Resolution No. 55 - 1993 received the Preliminary IIzgineeririg Report arid set
a public hearing for the impravements in this project, and
W�.S, a public hearing was held on August 16, 1993, regarding this project, ar�ci
WI�REP,�S, Resolution No. -1993 ordered the itt�i�avement and final plans aryd
specifications and estimates of cost and amer�ded Street Im�ravement Project No. ST.
1993 - 1&2 by adding 7th Street.
NOw Tf��ORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of F�idley, Anoka
County, Minnesota as follaws:
1. That the following impravements proposed by Council Resolution No. 54 -1993 are
hereby orciered to be effected and campleted as soon as reasonably possible, to-
wit:
Street improvements, including gradiizg, stabilized base, hot mi�c bittnninous mat,
concrete curb and gutter, stonn sewer system, landscapirig, and other facilities
located as follaws:
7th Stxeet firoai Madison tA 900 feet west
That the work ixzvolved in said in�rovements as listed above shall hereafter be
designated as:
7TH STRE�P FIi(J�i I�DI9�T TO 900 FEET WEST
2. The plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works Depaz'tment for such
improvements and each of them pursuant to the Council resolutions heretofore
adopted, a copy of which plans and specifications are hereto attached and made
a part thereof, are hereby approved arid shall be filed with City Clerk.
�e Public Works Director shall a000n�irigly include this work with the 1993
street reconstruction program.
P�SSID AI�ID ADOFi�D BY T!� CITY QOUNCIL OF Tf� CITY OF FRIDLEY TfIIS 13TIi LIAY OF
SEFPII�II2, 1993.
ATl'E'S�I':
WILLIAM A. C��MPA - CI'TY CIg2K
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
31
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Eng!neering
Sexe�
tVale�
�Parks
Siree:s
ti1ainten�nce
MEMORANDUM
William W. Bums, City Manager � I".
� �
John G. Flora, Public Works Director
Scott Erickson, Asst Public Works Director��
September 13, 1993
PW93-323
Street Improvement Project 1993-1&2: Change Order No. 1
Additional work is required regarding the street reconstrucrion projects. The majority of
the e�rtra work is related to the reconstruction of a section of 7th Street west of Madison
Street and a section of Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive.
The reconstruction of 7t:
improvement project. T]
concrete curb and gutter
work is $60,000.
i Street will be performed in conjunction with the 1993 street
e reconstruction consists of minor widening, the installation of
and a bituminous overlay. The estimated cost to perform this
The reconstruction of Hathaway Lane east of Regis Drive will also be performed in
conjunction with the 1993 street improvement project. The reconstruction consists of minor
widening, the installation of concrete curb and gutter and a bituminous overlay. The
estunated cost to perform this work is $30,000.
During the reconstruction of Polk Street, we encountered very poor soils in that area. In
order to bridge the poor soils, it was necessary to install fabric and additional base material
for the street section. The cost to perfortn this work is $6,200.
The total amount of this change order is $107,240. It is recommended that Council approve
Change Order No. 1 of Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1993-1&2.
SE/JGF:cz
Attachment
32
,�
�:'�.
.. ,�
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E.
FRIDtEY, MN 55432
September 13, 1993
Northwest Asphalt
1450 County Road 18
Shakopee, MN 55379
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1, 1993 St�eet Improvement, Project No. ST. 1993-1&2
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized, and instructed to modify your contract for the 1993. Stre�t.Im�rQV�ment
Project No. ST. 1993-1&2 by adding the following work:
Addition:
Item Location Part
Common excavation Monroe- A
6 in. Gate vaives Alden Way wtrmn P
12" RCP pipe apron
w/trash guard Fire Train Ctr M
Grouted rip-rap MLB Pk Lot
Cable Crete Fire Train Ctr M
Hydrant extensions Regis Dr & Brookview BG
Valve box extensions Regis Or & Brookview BG
Saw-cut concrete pave. Regis Ln & 53rd �C
Geotextile fabric Polk St C
Common excavation Polk St C
Granular borrow Polk St N
Turn arrows 69th overlay
7th Street
Hathaway �n
TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS:
Quant"
190 cy
2 ea
2 ea
40 cy
340 sq ft
4.5 If
4.5 Ib
400 If
1,000 sy
400 cy
400 cy
2 ea
R NTE
S NTE
Price
$ 5.00 $
405.00
725.00
2,800.00
10.00
120.00
100.00
4.10
1.00
5.00
8.00
200.00
Amount
950.00
810.00
1,450.00
1-0�(1J:()!:
3,400.00
540.00
450.00
1,640.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,200.00
400.00
.• ��� ••
• ��• �•
TOTAL ADDITlONS S io7,240.00
Original Contract Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . $ 902,467.32
Contract Additions - Change Order _.� p7,240.00
No.1 .......... ........................
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �1.009,707.32
32A
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
Page 2
Change Order No. 1
September 13, 1993
Submitted and approved by John G. Flora, Public Works Director, on the 13th day of September,
1993.
Prepared by
Checked by
��
.- ,
%'
�
� . Flora, P.E.
' ector of Public Works
Approved and accepted this day of
1993 by
NORTHWEST ASPHALT, INC.
Thomas Kenney, Project Coordinator
Approved and accepted this day of
, 1993 by
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Wiiliam J. Nee, Mayor
William W. Burns, City Manager
�
I) �
J,
� 66fh AVE.
J '�
�� �� _ _ � Rice (I II _ w. Z
- W ,h ,
� U
'�J ' � � �� CREEK��� '� 7TH STREET & � �, �
N N PAND(`°" W �
veR' HATHAWAY LN IMPROVEMENT N J��"��"
ENNA�►O,y 'P r*� �/
� �'!'/1 Stis � I 1►��LJUIIIIII� llr II ��C,,(;etk �
� �, v'J
c� _
W X
Z
= N 0 Z Z �
3 � � 4
IY yj _.:J �-. ,�; _ .: � _
Q Z r 1-:`;�gn Scnco� N',.^r
tn N � � :�.i
2 y ; '.:
� H LIriLEW 0 .'
H t7 z; c n�^ ,.O
} cn O-- "_'-� � :
� 59t N �iE�_^o 59th�n ;
� N. E. _ � �,-'•� � �
j n cn � :.,� � GOLO
Z � I I 3 �:'":: TER. <,
i� ._ = L`�.�4I �' '""I th A���
�
PaK �
CREEK P �
53rd �"' t~i> AVE.
w Q Z ,�
U Z
�
w i Z �
a U — �
N. E. m ,..::.
,��n
�
.
�,
�.
�f
:,� ;
V '�F• �a W :.;•:
TRp�� 'QF Q � o�:
�LpG�ER y �
4 � .•:.
C R �.
. Fi�i:: : • . _
< � � --
_�
_� i Q
Eng+neenng
Sewer
Waler
Parks
Slreets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager �,�
��
FROM: John G. Flora, �Public Works Director
�� �lyde V. Moravetz, Engineering Assistant
DATE: September 13, 1993
PW93-321
SUBJECT: Resolutions Establishing and Revoking _Certain Streets on our MSAS
System
The City Council has preliminarily approved the attached revocations and designations of
the Fridley State Aid System.
Attached are two resolutions with a map illustrating names and locations of the streets in
question. Recommend Council approval of resolutions establishing and revoking certain
streets on our MSAS system.
CVM/JGF:cz
Attachments
33
a
�
� ��
,
�� �
' Cn..<n � .e ..
_. + �o..n.� e cu,:�. P= Precinct
� r.,i��o.i e.u�..y. � i/
'?� ro...
•o ro.��orn�.
• s��«�
:i:r A-0K tc4ael Aq����
�r.;,;� a..a. k..d �.,,, , = : ; : S Ar(E
.
.
. 1
.�.w_. .....""� ..."'"'."_"..." '"" ���� .��'��I��JJU .SM�NO 1111tE� •�11K ..5��.......' P
��— — '� �i=. • ..�.. .... � �~L•a
� ' u � ~ ` ^ �•, ...... ��..«
.�r� u. ' �-1 .+ �
.. \\�` - - �• <�.c . y y ........ . _� . •I � .
\i\ �+ ' ' ' '�:: Y� �� . rN. .... i
\\ \1 _ i ? � �'aaw.. «. � � �'
` �� � I ...... � O Q '_'!LLS �: i: r.... �
� 1• iwo ! O� 00 :!� Y� �i
� ', � � -?•-' � �a.� - p�u�YV
I��° � t-•...,.L•� � �% .I -- -- �--ra+wc_-- ...... ° Y {
i-�.-- � t ! �' � : .1�5 eeeuuu � `°�a',.���ai' =-- „ ` � �
1� ^ � ' _ _ �i �� ,..
�a/ � .��. _ i / Q`^ * - E� a� 9� -y = ..
i . 1 � c ...
; _. _ �_ �� `>.: ..1� ---- � .. .,.. .
� ;; —
�� ;; � � � �-- ..
�; : �a
J / qTr _ 1 l � � � I ...... .. ' ...«. ......... � .... ..... -
/•' � i' co..t� a. � I ... , .... - .�
J• � - ' -- '- -- -- -- -- -- -- -
�. I1: ioo - : � .. _ '' �
/!�� - � . �. n o q 'di7t ... �' - _
/ �-� I" �1.. �' �. � a •) ^ o IOCRE 1A11[ /� � �
� �j� J.�''i.�.^.i� %�,,; ,.9 � ....., n � �II� c ° .'� a ✓ 4r'.' � - \ - _ `
• � � i 1 ��� n � � ` •� . � . 4 � G. y > �' �, 1
'1�'SJ'�'J•, J �-�,^^ r. D �.i ,-■,, L o ' •`\\ \\ //_ >Pc�� ao r--�
. i r� J.� �. ,� J � c, o 0 0 _�..
.�: 7 J �}y "� G' O C e e �
� �1�'�'�'.�"J.)'�� � � C` \\
� :.../ i! :)'� n ^ � J � o : q �� � ......... _ ....._... ... '
. � ;; ��, � nn.s.�.�. ���oca�-�oN�,;;� ��^:�
. . ii c �i ..�+ � or � f.'s . C�Jo .� ..�� ��_ 1� .�
�. a I s�"'� •_�`+• � _.
};i 4 �I � � I �t' � ; � �-- •�, —, i �, �.cr-•-�,.� '� =��L�0��0�
� ,� �� - � I�+ ) �� .�i �— ��,u._.• � ,� C ``� � t, �; � �"�i c-a c� a-
�� � c;., ,� r � �Q: :.0_ :�.:
,� "i; I ��y' : " � � � , "
i' c ° ;� ^ / . I i o � G v(,�'i:.�� '�
;� �� �, /�< < �� J,��, y� �.
f` �,� � �j ,•/ J � ,�. �� t � i
ii ! II i��' '/ �� i `� �I i: � . .� O. V J �'. a e
, t r j � ° i � i i. � V;,.j .> ,
f ' �� ., �� 1� - -�,.•c: °� :
.� � ;; ;I�I ,/ M.S.A.S. DESIGNATIQN J 'I I _
� i - _ �!I ....�`' ...._ c �4�� '� lS�s.i _. ..... �
� �! � - � � -= = L~ = _J ^a+.w..w ,,,.�:� � �..� - � `
° ? w�.0 I � �'�:: � "�— ' IS } ...
.�.. ��� ;�� � _ ��. �,; � - � _�___: ... �� � ,- l; �� , -���
��.; � . _ �: �,
. _ ;; _ � n _ W�..�. �.
., _.. . � � � �. � �_ �;.
�; __...... � 4 ��� � - 1 _ � ..��,. �
y :s,7� � . = i - -II
II - i i ' i �O�D
� • \ �
_
•1 � �
� .
ii .
. �
S \
.. � �
11 .... , � I . �
.. g �� ° � g .� :� � a � : ,: � � _
,: - _ :
_ ,,, � �� .
_ �: � p rt• ._.. _. � L•;� � y' � r' : 1 , � • , � t
. ii `Q� i C L f� �'� �Ii r1 y1=� ry'M .. ' •�' -
� !"` `rr �� """',, ;
;�i •• •� a.... :j���jl.:ia . - �
.•t� *y . ��y r�
�: .
i �r i .
.�...... . ^
. I ......
o '
� -
r• r �
�
.. T• r
*r
1 — u .. c; irt..r._ _lTi, D ... ....... J'"
�,' � � t _.._.. � r a� -ti..�r•'��t� � �.�� -� -'� �
� � "�- -� - -.. r
iA � ti � i � ��.. . F � C�i
i d _ .-_�: ..� �.. _y'... ��:4 � V +
� � � ? � :-Ft v.��� =� �.i ��_ U �" i A K � � ., �� S ..... . ;
,1 , a - -� :'� �. -;� �. Q�, , '
i; �+ � ^- _ � ,1�.: O � C a'� r % `' _ � � ,i � .
;;;� __.._ :��.. ;:,�;-- M� � � ,f�v , _:..-. --- 1
i� �' , . � '.L�: . �� ri�. �I. / q y •1•I�C: ,
,' � . ..:.�� � -� N' � ; ° �, t _ � �� ��`^�
�,u,� � : 1'� �..
� � N � � .9�:11 �� � ,,l l.� � n`.�.���9�
„ � "' i 1���;�,;�"'��';�;��,,,,�; �:���,..,
, � - i � a � ,,;;,,, , �.,.,.,�-:,_
„ � :�������„ ,,,,,;�{� r�;_��a:L,._:
� ,r ' . i,�;��i�i����i��i5 .ty . � .��Jc.o
{ � i . � � : � i `-' , '';��' ��i�� �i� ii = �( fp)'�'?-�,
� '��,�'�';'���' ;1����.,7.��.��.
•.00l� - , y1 ���^I�� . i � '�, �ii ��'ni �i�'��i - �`_Y
�' ,r-=..... ��; ��� �-� i . �� 3,� �, �� ; ___ _ --;. .�;: .,,, `c�
�� I �l-;�; �_1_ ! � �'- -=—�1 _ ;' ''�' '�i��= � �' —,, , �-�---7� , �
i ;Ai i _ , '"�� �:
RE90I�17.'I�i Pb. - 1993
I2E80i,V1'IQDj F_�'i7lRT.T$f�ij(` MOIdICIPi�j� STATE AID STREE'I'$
WF�RE�S, it appears to the City Council of the City of Fridley that the street
hereinafter described stiould be desiqnated as a Municipal State Aid Streets under
provisions of Minnesota Iaws of 1967, Chapter 162.
Nl7W, T�ORE, BE IT RE90LVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley, County
of Anoka, that the street described as follaws, to wit:
Ter�n�ni
Miles
Squire Drive - Rice Creek �1 to C�melot In .06
Camelot Iane - Arthur St to Squire Dr .10
Stinson Boulevazd - 73�1 Ave to Osborne Rd
(1/2 Fridley, 1/2 Mounds View) .23 .46
TOTAL MSAS DESIGNiP,TION R�QiJES'T .39
be and hereby is established, located and desiqnated a Municipal State Aid Street
of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of M:i.nne.sota Department
of Transportation.
B�E IT FURTt�ft RE.90LVED, that the City Clexk is hereby authorized and directed to
fozwan3 two (2) certified oc�ies of this Resolution to the C�rnnissioner of
Hiqhways for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of
said street that the same be constructed, improved, and maintained as a Municipal
State Aid Street of the City of Fridley, to be rnutibered and ]azawn as a Municipal
State Aid Street as established by the State.
PASSID AI�ID ADOPTID BY � CITY C�TJi�CIL OF � CITY OF FRID?�Y �ff3 13'i'ii LIAY OF
SEPPII�ER, 1993.
ATl'EST:
WIL�L,IAM A. Cg�MPA - CITY CLEE2K
33B
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
RE90LT]TI@1 1�U. - 1993
RE,SOI�L)TION REVnImJG MtJi�TICIPAL S'i'ATE AID S7.�tE�'i5
W�S, it is evident to the City Council of the City of Fridley that the
streets hex-ein referenced should be revoked as Municipal State Aid Streets under
provisions of Mirinesota Iaws.
1�UW, Ti�REF�ORE, BE IT RE90LVID by the City Cotuzcil of the City of FYidley, County
of Anoka, that the streets described as follaws, to wit:
Control
Section Segm�azt Termini Mi1es
336 005 Arthur Street - Rice Creek Rd to Ca�m�lot Ln .06
302 010, 015 61st Avenue - East River Rd to N1ain St.
& 020 .23
• • • ��� � y.
.29
be and hereby are revoked as Municipal State Aid Streets of said City subject to
the appraval of the C.ommissioner of Minnesota Depart�xit of Transportation.
HE IT FURTf�R RF,SOLVID, that the City Clerk i.s hereby authorized and clirected to
fo��l two (2) certified copies of this Resolution to the Cc�nunissioner of the
Minnesota Degartme.nt of Transportation for his appraval of the revocation of said
Municipal State Aid Streets.
PASSID APID ADOPI�D BY � CITY 0.�IIiV�CIL OF TI� CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS 13TH DAY OF
SEPTII��ER, 1993.
: YY�.�1'�1
i�JILLIAM A. C��MPA - CITY CIII2K
34
WII�SANI J. NEE - MAYOR
E,^g+neenng
Seue�
LVale•
ParKs
ISlrcets
,h1aintenance
� MEMORANDUM
,
TO: William W. Burns, Ci Mana er � PW93-340
� � g y�a
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
DATE: September 8, 1993
SUBJECT: Locke Park Filter Plant
In the 1993 budget, we had identified a Locke Park filter plant rehab project at an
estimated cost of $750,000.
We are currently going out with the plans and specifications for bid. The current estimate
for the project is $630,000. In the bid, we are identifying some alternative contract items:
an air wash system $10,000, office partition $8,000, and synthetic greensand media $70,000.
By implementing these alternative deductions, the estimate would be $542,000.
I recommend we advertise the project and review the prices and make a decision on the
improvement once the bids have been opened.
JGF:cz
35
��
.
RE50LITi'I�T I�. - 1993
RE.SOI�Lfl'ION AU1�bDRIZING ADVII2TISII�lP OF BID6 FOR Ti�
IDCKE PARK FILTER PIANP REPAIR, PIif�TF7LT PU. 240
WI�I2�S, the irxke Park sarid filters have bee,n c]amaged and are no longer
functionirig properly, and
�,s, Maier Stewart & A.ssociates (MSA) has been retained to Prepare Plans and
specifications for the repair ar�d upgrade of the Ir�cke Fark filtet.�s, ar�ci
�i8, the 1993 budget has identified a capital i�mvement of $725, 000 for the
IACke Park filter plant repair, and
W�, the TCAAP Interconnect project incorporates a Supervisory Control and
Data Acquisition system which is to be installed in the L�ocke Park filter plant,
arxl
�, MSA has ao�npleted the plans for the IACke Park filtex plant regair, and
W�, it is prudent to repair the facility and 000niinate the constxuction
projects within the facility at the same time.
I�7F1, Tl�REF'ORE, 8E IT 1�90LVED TI�iT, the City Council of the City of F�idley,
Anoka County, Minnesota, the Public Works Director, John G. Flora, is authorized
to advertise for bids for the Irxke Park Filter Plant Repair project No. 240.
PASSID AAID ADOPTID BY TI� CITY C7OUNCIL OF R� CITY OF Fi2IDLEY TIiIS 13Z�i I]AY OF
�F���, 1993.
�
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLEE2K
35B
WILISAM J. NEE - MAYOR
E��a�neer, i�
Sewe�
�.v�ie�
ParKs
ISlrec,_
4'IaVnter�rce
MEMORANDUM
TO: Wilham W. Burns, City Manager �
��
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
DATE: September 13, 1993
SUBJECT: Stream Bed and Bank Erosion Control Project
PW93-284
In July, 1992, the City forwarded a project to the Rice Creek Watershed District dealing
with the stream bed and bank erosion control project in the 400 block of Rice Creek
Terrace. The City was involved in that project because of the storm sewer outlet into Rice
Creek at that location. Based upon the projected costs, the City at that tune indicated
support of funding $5,000 for the rip-rap work and a new end piece for the storm sewer
culvert.
Bids have -been received for the project. The Board of Water and Soil Resources is
granting $29,500, the Rice Creek Watershed District is funding $14,500, leaving a$16,000
amount to be funded by the five residents and the City of Fridley. Based upon our Storm
Water Policy, we can match the residents participation or $8,000.
The bids result in a$3,000 increase to the amounts previously noted.
As a means of removing the sediment occurring in Rice Creek and protecting the properties
in this area, I recommend the City Council authorize an additional $3,000 for a total of
$8,000 for the Kaufhold project on the 400 block of Rice Creek Terrace. Funds for this
project are available in the storm water utility contingency.
JGF:cz
36
�
.
�.. �
. ... : . — � - : ,;�� -- � . _ . - _ -. , , „ . - .
- �, ; :. � cV ' �,_- e �. y� �
—��T-- I ' i ` m 'a ^' ''� �/..''• '�N �*�:�;.eyc�tZ; ��•l � `�`' -:. ;
. � T � .. � � N � '.. � �,� �1� '� 3,
, N� � i ' ;zZ� '• C�. . .; � ;
�r . c._ � 'N ; ' i�q � � � �rC7t "i . `` \ i � t: � N ; .i . '�OSO � _._. •�
z '�. w � a _ .' _ �1 � _.;, ` - r � } :
� ^ i ��� ' N p M
e�. � " : e i S �u �h� �,` �D �� 11' �� •,S ' ` N �Y Y / � � v c� � • �
��� »� 1 K b � � •'n . '1 � • ' �b ��`��. .
� ± - � 1 i � �, R-, =` , = b�' ; ` • ` ° ^ ` ,,,, �N . o,
�' i� � ^� A ` 3 ���~•+� :.a - yN _ •''� h 7' f t � ^
� - � � � �—^ '�'� ,t s � t.�i N •.�51 1 ` �� M � N +
� . .• � '? ,Sf! '�!,} ° �Y. :� � + t<1 'ir � � : '
� $ � S J �'+y ' i'� 1 �� �. �i �/�j► :
.� ? . �, .t N -� . •. �.:..� N019NIH dM ° a
- � : o q : r ti � � � `c� 'ta� + •i f:S"�•I `' 1
# � : " :.,�,r.. � ,� • � o „'� .f •�r� ...,. �'.
` �.� M
. `' ��� `` , _ o' �t%� ,` I^ '
. �, •. ` S � � c � � a1 ���
. ° i' ' � ; _ ` J' �'� � � " � � • t! � w
- � /J � . � / �� �e e • � �` • � � �
�/ ° �t:,{•' ~ �' � Y4 � ` � / N ` .� � ` �t :� j � i \
� y,� � .:-�• ^� ° „, � � N ;,Q � �� � , h
: 1 � [y, `l :� ` � , .` ` 1 � � ' O� � � � ♦
' �a / ��,~} °f.► , ,'Jt%b . `�•• � tn J •:+• +� � `� �p .
; G > �� 4 j r \ .
+ Y.. � ti�� � _l 1 V � b
�h ; � ` � .�`°`' ; 1 S r., i.
' _ � / '�J��` � ' � ji s:r �
. / � � w e
� ..- ,., z.•� 1 N � m � � � ' �`r � � ; � ;. i
. _
�� ••'�� �,__� -�y �, � � � : 0 J .f
� 2 �' � -l' — .. . _
$ � � : . �,� . - & = � �� \s ..! _.. {-•--`
, �� ��� �. � __j' — . -- -, '%. / �r•r-etE-
� �°, �,. --- - --- •,i,� � + .: �7�` . r. t .<,, 3 ` � ,;� ,.�f ....; ��,° �
r �`
� � :�^.� / y�/J er - � ,> r � J �
' . \ ��� � `y� �.":��' 'i (���.� � � ,�+ � �� 0 � � • �' , � .
\� ''/ y `� ' :' � ` - ' �
`_�/ 2 a /' ' � � \ �'i �i 4i.-• ��s_ �. {� �D ♦ A. �
':.;; v` =� �, �`> 3�� .�. . �Y �.y ` �
�; t1►\\ � I � � �. /� � . � �`�� ' * 'r� l,�. ;i" • i'�� e" e •
er. ♦ � ^�.' -` ,i �_ �� `�!� i ./i, �` I y c�� .�'� ,, � N
y. i \ A _ i ` , �,�, ��'( � .� ' 4 / � W
� . �' V •� +.- �. _ __ . ;• �c �' ... ..��'''iii ya. Z Qj �� r' e �
�:7 �� � ,'�' �^a,•f •�� �� �h ! Z
� !d:O ...� �t� �. v '"y ; �;t' ` e' ►
. � ,.�� .` . , ' � �� r' I ^\ ti .^`` � , � ��%� tai :
1 f = ��' �'y � ��' `V� % ' � � •� - � � � �
� � '.n �J' �. / ♦��"_/��� ` ,,�� -.a• � �D Q
t! • ♦ � �' •• . ��1 i , r
.� • � � t
� � -�
� ♦ e. � �. � . -
� � � N `
� ...•:S . �% - %
r ' �
� � h
' , �. � -
�.II, i z .� +. • 5 ^ ,� ' ��'��y.se � -"--s- ~ :f � i: :fl
. ` .'' � ♦ ��, an.:n o � � Y - =%-� � ` . r ;�r' �+7�,.ir. � � — s _ ^�' , � r i ?
:o .:.• ' ,. ,.,, '- � �7' � � .♦ s' � � ,.'1S H19� "
b �� . �o � :K�;.rI:�:::.� - ����. y ••�•. �.: , �� ,� ; ,
`'1•' � .si.•ti J " �, 3^" +.- "• "' -�i � . .[.�
� v�j, s'z �^ � � o x �
t h ., ar
? • � � � � �y v.. <} . �i':;�.: � "i�t..e[:, -� �� „a O q
;^ _ N /►.1 �I n ; J • e � +.o V : �n. i f .r�' /� .� ,V � ^ :
1 � V f/ / •�,� .S • _ � i •�j „t
♦rs• . i e s.�ss .t � //�/ - �i .� ..1 `� t
ai a=•"l 1���` � ' Vii .� (p + .Cd� �� f . �'� 'S�' \ .j`' ' Q ', an '� � \
� `_ ` N + � �i- ' �,/�� � � a�,r •� � � .w' ,,' ' . �� t `
r�,,, •fr r� � �� °'�: �I .i � �
v " ti .. �� : 4 J - ': � +�.,.. -^ J, y^Y ' f i t� ;
V c. �''1 / . V J•
.. � n
, � .
.
. z at r! .a . a. ii'X'r �0' .�i ' ~ •{� � '.�/' `'� e
���'4. �i . �� tt , re �
, .y S'
. /� �7
. 1 /
L /
. •�n,'Q/\�O, X33li�: ..,. i«xi '':i`Y.'•^ � \ �h' I y N �c
. , ��n� / ''��
�J:ii° /� �) �� i � �// '� 1 n
a . . �ry J'Q��.,t�� t Y ! i�� i
> �.� - - ' •- :3 . ,. ,, _ � 1, l` _�r ; s -
. . Q c. I c • � 4l. a �h•.�•_ �6 � ' J � y �..f �- ���� � � � M •i • a
- _ � '- �l. N ' • � •� / , � � I � � : O • :, �' �i `x(�]/ 1��ti_ � �' til
• � 1 ' . v t
� oE eB � •/ :I � � i{ }O/ `x LS���a� � � � •
O 1. `� :: � oJ • ` �
, � ' � �i�� ;:t� �i� ' �s �� � •
�: �;j � � �� •3 •N �'1S Hl� e
y t • N
�p- • � ,,.� � 7
� � � t' �i 1 /� �h � . •�� t[ t s�
a ��� o �s � ir�-
� � : la t- s�s� ,_ �• _ N M � 4 V , n � •
' C • •.� J r :,� f/
�iQO�+ o �: . �: ._�� s,en r� , se re �t se rs a?'��
.S �� ' . .
; � ni�► _ "_"__ �_' '_� '" � cY�� � _. ar �i _ .
. •f.:� -�-+ Ai!n.^s- 7�fri- � - - ' � ,�, � �� � - - - - -� -- - - - - - -- - � - - - -' - -
--';—,---- �-- —;- - --- �----�---�—��., �.8,...y ~ �� � �NflN1 31
��; ' (ZN ' MH
.. - �__' r..-_—,_' _ N , ` Z ari �+vK"vS � : � _ __
: � Y; � � :.:: ---------------•------ •�-^- � �-^ --7�ef77 �T� •'�?�Intl�
.. ;` i' ` i +r
. i ti �. � �° 7o:ry-uas-"-:�� : • . ' . ...
._`.��.� �.' ; � , '. 'f �� 41 L � } •f
� . � a3s ^ . _ ,— 'f + . � t'\ : ,�, 4 t _
`�:: . „� � ; � _ yt� vi .us�... � +.^:r..` _ �r �� ' � s-','�+�' •• �n•r�'� :
f. � V � I' '. � � �� . , y t _� " ' � ; �N� •`, � •N � •
° _' ,i- :; � N '� � 3 i `.s.: _ . t i N g .: _ . V'
•,�t . N A K fyst � t a • S ' \ Z - > ✓ y � �� �
, \i l� �•� • 04�.1 � �E � ;_ �� ' . ; •; ..{u�� `^ � '
�1,: e�='�x� .:P N . � � ;�}• � +
: � ' j � �� r �,� ��.�
� = :i N N a k : a 1� ,� ' \ �' • ��� ` , r• �' a'..
' !`-' � � `` d M ,�=
,�� � ' o -�, � . �. ; �, - . ;,.,' '� ' �
a a N1 y +'� ^1 �` Li .i M?��' � 1 �J r:
i '_ 'S�` � ,'�� � �n'� �� L` �n�P%. .+. r � 1r� ��.i'� _ _ ' \ - a • ��`'� O , r r� u,��' S.
' F+ � V � _ �� � ) ; ..
� :�:. . - ` \/ a t�. �; : � f. - aj • p,�, �;���.
-. s�-'� I / � ` �O l ♦ ` � i.i �/�� 4� � � ) �'+��_ �� � �� /�'• Q` •
,a. � � �1 - J� ; � � k� ' ..
' :'vy'•,c. }y9 /r' v� � �'k.t �'
>�` 7' '— .. y � '.ti V� ' � , '• � : � ts iF �.:
i, =N"'i_�'Z � �-, �- �- �Z t � ~ .'���� y i �v' ��'' ,`ay.t� �
- � - ;, ,, � .�.�V - .j,��,' d, ' �� • .�F.�:
. � ...
, . . ..
. , .
. „. .
,.
-..
ar--- i� 1. , �- �� > a L� L'��+.-- -`'>-J
�Engineering
y Sewer
� �C Water
�
� O Parks
O 3 Streets
� V Maintenance
U_
W —�
� m
O�
a
�
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Bur� , City Manager ' PW93-239
FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director
DATE: July 1, 1993
SUBJECT: Stream Bed and Bank Erosion Project
On June 30, 1993 I attended a meeting with representatives of the Anoka County Soil and Water
Conservation District, the Rice Creek Watershed District and residents of Rice Creek Terrace
regarding the stream bank e�osion project on the 400 block of Rice Creek Terrace. This project
consists of five residents who submitted a project to #he Rice Creek Watershed District Stream
Bed Erosion Control Program in 1992.
The current project estimate is $60,000. The Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District
has obtained a grant of $29,500. It is proposed that the Rice Creek Watershed District will be
contributing $14,500, leaving $16,000 for the residents. The City had previously agreed to
contribute $5,000 to the project in conjunction with our storm water policy and the fact that we
have a culvert in deteriorating condition, which is within the project.
I expect the Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation District will submit the project for
approval and request the City and property owners to increase their participation by another
�3,000 for a total of $8,000.
This project is consistent with the Gity and the Rice Creek Watershed District policies, and I
recommend the Council consider this request favorably. Upon receipt of the formal notice, I will
add this to the appropriate Councii agenda.
JGF:cz
.:
/
�
cmr0�
FRlDLEY
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager
FROM: John G. Fiora, Public Works Director
DATE: September 13, 1993
SUBJECT: Rice Creek Projects
PW93-335
Over the past few years, the Rice Creek Watershed District has been activeiy engaged in a
stream bed and bank stabiliza#ion program. In that process, we have identified a total of eight
projects on Rice Creek within the City of Fridley.
Project No. 1 was a bank stabilization and diversion cost of $30,000. The City contributed
$1,000 for that project.
Project No. 2 was the removal of the old dam structure and adjustment of the creek alignment.
This was a$65,000 joint project between the Rice Creek Watershed District and the DNR.
Project No. 3 was a stream bank erosion project and creek alignment at $21,000. The City
contributed $3,450.
Project No. 4(900 area) was a stream bank erosion contro! project at $21,000. The City
contributed $6,000.
Project No. 5(600 area) this is the most recent project that we have received and is estimated
on the high side of $62,000 with a City participation of $15,000.
Project No. 6(500 area) is the largest stream bank project to date and is estimated at $200,000
with the City's contribution based upon that figure of $40,000.
Project No. 7(300 area) is the Kaufold project at $60,000 with a City contribution of $8,�0.
In addition, the District has participated with the County in the stream bank project at Manomen
Park.
JG F: cz
36C
/
�
C.IIYOF
FitlDLEY
� ��• WF�.
H ��C �� '
xN �(]
'�M Vf� W��GU
(� W
� x� ���
a« aa
o • w y u
� �� ���...
W 6�.` W
� z �
'
, ��
�
� j
� L
h
Y
�u /
��
�/
�
V
�
0
m
d
U
y
J
�i_ �.
�
:�
�
�
G
O
S
Q
�
�
�
u�
:/
z
w
O
M
W
a
�
r
w
�
<
<
J
� �
Q"
_ - �2
�
3
h
W
V
2
W
0
�
�
O
O
J
4
i'
�
�� a.�D
' �
J
W
h
r<
r m
�
�j/
�1
�j �
li 1 y8� 9
/�BO`2r ./
/ �
�� �l �1��
B' 9 t > oi�
� �'9p..ti-� a
x � po
UL'
� �II I �
� 19.�ti .
;g\� �\
j ° •
1 \Z.N1 �i
� J
� 11
1 �� �
.�
Y
w
J Z
O J
� d
LL w
oW
� �
r
J
�,
� 9
�$
,i �
/�
`, �
.\ � \
Y
Q
O
t� 3
r ' ' , '
I • ` / J.�� � , �
i� / . � /
. � y /
r -� � -� / /
fl /
I � o, _ �ysv.�'- . , J;
c �
j ,ti. / _ _ _ :�� �;
/ �g•� �� - -- J
� � —
,o� !J �i % � �
Ic'!� � % , .
�
/ / -- f z / l`
. / J
/ J i
�
� � O
�� i v� .` }-
! �C � %
% v � �X '
�• -j o�.. ,�o ,j
z�o n� �
Q
. VF-� Z�
Z Wi.. —
r a � i e
� z o�_
-- ' X O � W !�-
` ID tJ \ .9
�, � � J���, �'
�-- � ,� ,t
— � `� �6 ,�.
• � ��r—� `\ ���: � \�
.
\ � ��l �•�
� � � �
:�. ^
�, , C �
�
k Q�
�a �- -�-�....
\'�� T � � �
.\ ��7 \ � � i
?'��
� ��� `,\ � �'2E
�l \� ° ' - -
v O s
/ � O 1 2b _
Q• � �£+�$ .
�o \ ��
Ccp
�\\ � ``•`
�` .� z� 8 ��
'�h£ �
� y �,.
a � . +
2 W
2 �^ `�
� �
$ O
3 a
H �
x )
N CL
Cf .oi 'u
m ,
�'`�_ '
N �(• � l
'� •
/ �7 't
0
�
1
�
t
�
36D � �
��
O m
�Ek
ti A
�C$r
w W p
V C
�a�
O
a��
E
O H 4
W Uq6
o �ac
z f. a :
Ks:
wz:
oc
UEti
�wt
av�c
�t
oc
aWi
�mi
N�
O i
qOi
tt t-t
. �H:
O W +
U v7 '
i�
`
;�:
,
�
,
I\
W
v
>
�
I W
, N
�/
: � �� � -_
_� :; , _ `�i �.`� <� �. ' ,.
RCVI/D PROJECTS
SPRING LAKE
O _ I
�� �� ��- 65 p
F' I
�
75th AVE
Z
W
K
m W
z
>
�.�� j�. ..���
; r�
: - s�sr �
�
PARK
:�
1. BRIC.-+ADOON PL. N.E.
2 T_H. 65 WEST SERVICE DP
� John EnCkso . . . ^
��� 11 ` . .S riRg.^
108 �. .. 'L ok�
Fc .
•:�;:i•.:;::;: ::: - •.• .• .R -r• `OR. ��
5 •..Q;: ... .... •• - 2W � p
dcrest � I � Z � ��
ientary Z�.__ � 7 F� W
AVE. N. E. 0 rn j
�
> T6th •, AVE. �
Troiler �*-21� W a z
COUft z � TSfh A . N. �
FlRESiDE DR. ' � �' � � � v~i
(Private) Z � ���^:; -'x
73rd
� Locke
;;^;�" -:'�.:',} �fl�:{ BI'�?.
'-�i'.,� �.i`f.,- _7.- �
yl+y� J'J,•,�• `!~• `i.l�.
%,.: „ . . � .I-: 'r pJ�
��:J ��� � ~���� r}.Y
tE�l<�'t� � . : J:, `-��' .t.i�
VOORA �.•'Y`�.
WN
� ���
� �,Q '�<
9
'' �� v v�h o 68t� AV£. ..
, �,"j � ,c . . � �, �p
/ � ^~ � a Z V
II � � :c['�� O O
� ierrac . �t%'`r.� tn � F-
� 7 f h AVE- K a N�9 -0VE
�. 1,,..
66th AVE. N.E. � CLOVER 't:,teac
,,,� , Hayes r 66th..:�.'
,- C.r.�:-zn o� cnnsi Eiemen�a,v PL.
MISSISSIPPI �� �i N
Cl� ' 'iCrc�,ii, U:�.:c: .+.,... _ �. _ ^ :�
> '
-.: i.,! `'� , o BENNETT�-�' p�R Z �
� ' :> . , z f- v�i
J FOURMI ES � z w x 64 th
= o 0 o r �
� laJ = tn � U
z ? �
�RY R N E Z a W a � � w
� 63rd ����1 � !i AV�. N�E. m m
s�
v o >�„•- w
=iannery— • � i;� j%� � J W
ANONDAGO ST :-� f- J
►- ►- cn 73 1/2 AV E i ?
731/2 AVE. ; • Q a �
rJ �AVE� w = N. E.
� 2
72�d qy � � 1'� _ �
�n �.��., �rari �::Trc; -.-
," i v
19 , O�!AN Vci;�sQcr�
a rO�PQRa'(InN
ORTON I�VE.
69th) IAVE. N.E.
C }� ,�
Ilr
T 30 N
� 12, 7
J- �24 W 13 I 18 R 23 �
y \
AVE. N.E.
(-_
�
�`i ` AV E� J ,;':' .:: •: pZ,° �, tn v� N
� }
p.',eE�3 unitar �� 66 �h 66th A •N' � 66 th .Wj
>-�. �> - Cnurc. �
� Y Q v CREEKPp'�K Q Z 1
x o j ,� �p,. � o n'� a�
0 oao J a ST a a � �
C �
O � N V DA NA C�
AVE.�a' o; � 64th AVE. N. E. �
°' o
�' CAMEL oT s `Q
W,� �
�" 0. 6 RICE CREEK �
� 6 3r r��� �� �---1 �--_ _1 t i
Engineering
Sewer
Water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager ��. PW93-322
(� �
FROM: John G. Flora,`Public Works Director
DATE: September 13, 1993
SUBJECT: Advertise for 1994 Sidewalk Snowplow Lease/Purchase Proposal
During the 1994 budget discussions, the City Council approved the lease/purchase of a new
sidewalk snowplow to be used this winter to clear sidewalks after snow events. The City of
Fridley Public Works Department would like to advertise and award the lease
purchase/agreement this fall with the frst payment due after January 1, 1994. This would,
hopefully, allow delivery of the sidewalk snowplow late this fall or early winter.
The specifications have been prepared and are ready to send to equipment dealers.
The existing 1984 Boschung Pony sidewalk plow with a snowblower will be traded in.
Proposals will be received on September 29, 1993 and a recommendation to lease/purchase a
unit will be presented at the October 4, 1993 Council meeting for delivery in mid November.
Recommend the City Council make a motion to authorize the advertisement for bid proposals
for the lease/purchase of a new sidewalk snowplow and accessories.
BN/JG F: cz
37
/
�
CliYOF
FTi1DLEY
NOTICE TO BIDDERS
ONE (1) NEW SIDEWALK SNOWPLOW AND ACCESSORIES
Sealed lease/purchase proposals wiil be received and publiciy opened by the City of
Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota, at the office of the Public Works Director, 6431
University Ave., NE, Fridley, MN 55432, (Tel. 572-3450), on Wednesday, the 29th day
of September, 1993, at 11:00 am, for the furnishing of one (1) sidewalk snowplow and
accessories.
All in accordance with specifications prepared by John G. Flora, PE, Public Works
Director, Fridley City Hall, 6431 University Ave NE, Fridley, MN 55432.
Specifications may be examined at the office of the Public Works Director and copies
may be obtained for the equipment dealer's individual use by applying to the Public
Works Director.
Proposals must be made on the basis of a lease/purchase for the sidewalk snowplow
machine, and accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check (on a responsible bank
in the State of Minnesota) or a bidder's bond made payable without condition of the City
of Fridley, MN, in an amount of not less than 5 percent (5%) of the total amount ofi bid.
The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive any
informalities in any proposals received without explanation.
No proposals may be withdrawn for a period of thirry (30) days.
By order of the City Council of the City of Fridley, MN.
Dated this 13th day of September, 1993.
John G. Flora, P.E.
Public Works Director
Published: �ridfey Focus
September 15, 1993
September 22, 1993
37A
CITY OF FRIDLEY
Attachment 6
Budget Detail Form
Submitted by John G. Flora Budget Year 1994
�
Department Division
, Public Works STREET, PARKS, MECHANICS
Account
No.
4341 � Re�tals
.lustification:
Sate{{ite rental—satellite 49'er 1250
Cylinder rental
Portable compressor
Equip. rentals (brush 8� sod cutte�)
Lease Agreement Sidewalk Snowplow
TOTAL
Dollar
Amount
Requested
Inc./Dec.
Over Last Year
20,290
Total Budget
Requested
26,680
City Manager's Council's
Recommendation Decision
$5,850 Recreation Dept.
300
1,000
700 �
18,830
$26,680
37B
1. Type:
2. Usage:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
CITY OF FFLT�►
PUBLIC %URRS DEP'A�'1'
tl�`I'AII�D $P�7C:I�'IG�TION3
For Diesel-P�wered Sid�ewalk Plaw (100 �)
Snawblc�wer Att,a�i�mrexit
V-Plaw AttaCtm�xit
New latest model at time of delivery, ccanplete with
R.O.P.S. approved heated cab.
Equipm�nt will be u��ed to remave snow frarn sidewalks
within the City of Fridley.
General: The vehicle and associated equipanent shall be of rugged
design and c�onstruction thLro�uc�out; feature ideal
handling c.haracteristics for e�,se of operation; and be
capable of operating for sustained periods under extreme
weather and c�peratitlg conditions.
�. -
Transmission:
The vehicle shall meet or exceed all applicable Federal
and Mirmesota laws and regulations in force at the time
of delivery, including bacxup alarm.
a. Miniminn 100 HP (diesel), 4 cycle
b. E�ternal disposable oil filter and fuel filter
c. Gavernor setting at maxim�nn c�ontinuous
manufacturers reocarnnended RPNLs
d. Ccenplete engine gauges, oil pressure, water
te,mperature etc.
e. Magnetic drain plug
f . Heavy�iuty cooling
a. Hydrostatic shall be infinitely variable speed
forward and reverse, with dual speed r�ange transfer
case.
PI�O: FYorit and rear PPO must be of sufficient capacity to.
operate a snawblawer at slaw vehicle speed.s, arxi when
vehicle is stationary, indep�xlently clutched from
� vehicle.
Axles:
Steex'ing:
Wheels/Tires:
Axles must be of a type that will allaw all wheel drive
at the operator's c�ption with differential lock front
and rear.
Articulating steeririg.
4�eels and tires will be high traction nuid-snow tires .
2
37C
10. Hydraulirs: Hydraulic pim� capacity shall be of sufficient volwne
and pressure to operate vehicle and attachments
satisfactorily even at law erigine RPMs.
11. Cab: Certified R.O.P.S. enclosed type one-man cab. Windaws
should easily remave for emergenc.y exit. Bostroan
su.spension type seat. Horn, heater defroster (of
sufficient size to keep all windaws clear), two-speed
windshield wiper, rearview mirror, sound deadening,
seatbelt and shoulder belt.
12. Lights: 'Itao headliqhts, two taillights with turn signals, turn
signals with 4-way flashers, bac3�up light, rear work
lic�t. Amber strobe lic�t, 12V eleckric syste�n.
13 . Instnunents : Tachcenetex', hour meter, attq� meter, watex t�t�er'ature,
oil pressure, any other gauges rec�ner�ded by
manufacturer. All gauges shall be internally lighted.
Safety shut dawn for lvw oil or high water temperature.
14. Vehicle
Dimensions:
15. Turnirig
Radius:
16. Brakes:
The width of the vehicle is extr�mely im�ortant.
Vehicles exceedir� 51" will not be considereci.
Turn radius maxinnrm 12' inside diametex.
Service brake on all wheels. Vehicle shall be equipped
with a parkirig type brake.
17. Sexvice: Vendor shall have sold a minim�un of 25 of the units
similar to the unit bid in the Minneapolis "metro" area,
that are still in service. List of locations shall be
pravided.
18. Hitches:
�
Usage:
FYont: Quick disconnect for plaw/blawer connection,
includixig hydraulics and lift cylinder.
Rear: Category 3 with dual lift cylinders.
V-Plaw
V-plaw shall be of heavy-duty construction
Plaw will be �sed to remwe snaw frcan sidewalks in the
City of Fridley
Specifications: Maxim�nn width at base 49"
Maxiirnnn width at top 51"
Replaceable han�ened cutting edge. Replaceable hardene�l
nose edge.
3
37D
Snawblawer
Type: Heavy-duty industrial type hydraulic or medianically
operated frean tractor specified in bid. Snawblawer must
be operable when p�ash vehicle is not in motion.
Sriowblawer shall meet or exc�eed all applicable Federal
and Minne.sota laws an�d regulations in foroe at time of
delivery.
Usage:
Dimensions:
Specifications:
Paint:
7�ao�tay Radio:
Snawblawer will be u��ed to re�ve sYZaw frcea sidewa].ks
in the City of FYidley. Blawer shall have a quicJc
discoruzect oauplirig frce�t pawer uni.t.
Snowb2awer shall not e.�cceed 51" in width.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Ztao augexs
Three blade ;��ler
Replaoeable inq�eller hausing
Chute moust rotate a mini�taua of 270 degree,s
Chute deflector hydraulically oontrolled
Cutting edge must be replaceable
Shear bolts must be easily ac�essable
Blawer lifting controls, chute rotation control
and chute deflection control must be easily
controllable fn�n inside cab by operator
Optional trucJc loading c.�ute shall also be provided
Snowblawer shall match engine HP of push unit
Calor will be selected at time of acceptance frarn
st.arydard colors available frcan the manufacturer.
Midland, M�odel 70-1336B, installed
8-30-93
C:\WP\STREEIS\SIDWI�.PIW
4
37E
l.
2.
Praposal Form
, City of Fridley
Diesel-Pbwered 5idewalk Plow
and Attad�nnents
Septe�nber 29, 1993
One diesel-pawered sidewalk plaw
including freic�nt, har�dling ar�d
sales tax
One v plaw as specified, includirig
freight, handling, and sales tax
3. One sxiowblaaer, inclt�dir�g cyptional
truck loading rhute, freiqht, handling�
and sales tax
4.
5.
. ._
Trade-in allawance on a 1984 Bosrhung
Fony sidewalk plaw, snnwblawer and
angle plaw
Net Cost
Net Cost, (i.ncluding interest, sales ta�c,
freight, haridlirig) $ divided
by 3= for Janu�ary 1994
for JanuaYy 1995
for January 1996
Optional - 2-way Midlarid Radio installed
1
37F
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
The Trackless Snow Blower is a highly
efficient two stage, twin auger unit that has no
equal in removing snow from sidewalks.
It is available in two widths, 51 inch and 70
inch. Both will accept either a sidewalk chute
or a quick change truck loading chute. Many
municipalities utilize both chutes with their
snow blower. After clearing their sidewalks,
they change to the truck loading chute to load
windrowed snow from the street or from cul
de sacs. In both cases the maneuverability
and physical size of the MT and blower are
less apt to create traffic congestion than
larger snow blowers. An average loading time
for the MT and snow blower is 7 yards per
minute.
Overall heavy duty construction includes 3/8
inch thick sideplates, a double wall impeller
housing and a 15 inch diameter bearing
assembly for smooth accurate chute rotation.
High strength, low alloy steel augers with ice
picks and a heavy duty balanced impeller,
easily handle the toughest snow conditions.
The snow blower is manufactured by
Trackless Vehicles to ensure that the quality
and service parts availability is equal to that of
the MT.
Positive and accurate steering of the blower in
confined areas and around obstructions is
due to the articulated steering of the MT. The
ability to move the blower sideways by simply
turning the steering wheel allows the operator
to safely ap�roach any obstruction.
FOR FURTHER EVALUATION A
DEMONSTRAtION MAY BE ARRANGED
SPECIFICATIONS:
Housin_. ; 1"' wide x 38" high �vith 3/y" end plates.
Augers _- 13" diameter spiral �vi;h ice picks.
Impelle� := x 24" — 3 blade
Impeller ':using liner. 2 piece ;-aol��ceable).
Turn tat a Ball bearing.
Chute �; :_:-.�r Hydraulic motor ,; c chain.
Chule c;';.ior. Hydraulic cylir�,:er conirolled.
Cutting �; :e�. 6° x 3/a" harden��:. ,•2e�ersible).
Shear _;:; On auger drive an.: �� n P.7.0. drive.
Adjust2_ ; :utting height Usin_. :�� link.
Quich ;.. , a truck IoadinG c.•__ •, clear2.nce
V��eiqh; ' : ; 0 Ibs.
HP r:3: .: :l�
37G
Truck
Loadir^ Chute
A
Sidewalk
Chute
�
�:,_
(3353 --:m)
Q�..
, (231 1 m
r v
J
Ei�g+neenng
Sev+e�
'.V�ler
ParKs
Slreets
".9ai�tenance
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager ��•
��
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
DATE: September 13, 1993
PW93-346
SUBJECT: SCADA System Project -
On Thursday, September 9, 1993, we opened the bids for the Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA) system project. Eleven (11) firms were interested in the project. We
received three bids. The low bidder was Automatic Systems with a total bid of $376,850.
The Army portion of the SCADA improvements amounted to $325,000. The City requested
some additional items for security and meters, which amounted to $51,850, for a total bid
of $376,850.
It is the Army's position that the City should fund their additional instrumentation as well
as design costs. The design cost for the project amounts to $1,767.10, or a total cost of
$53,617.10 for the City's items. This amount is below the 1993 budget item of $60,000 for
instrumentation.
Recommend the City Council receive the bids and award the contract for the Supervisory
Control and Data Acquisition, City project No. 259, to Automatic Systems at a cost of
$376,85Q.
Recommend the City Council authorize payment of $1,767.10 to Maier Stewart &
Associates for the design of the City surveillance items.
JGF:cz
:
�
��". a
(i�-:U= _:.
tiEF-':-9� F�'I 1Q:i� i1AI�T STEWART ASSOC. FAX N0, 7740838
/ , �
--- -- �
! September 10, 1993
� File: 900-000-00
h�r. John G. Flora
pirector of Public �Yarks
City of Fridlzy
Civic Centex
6431 U�v.vessit.y A��enue NE
Fridley, �!LN 55432
F. � �
CONSUITING ENG�NEERS
Maier Stewart & Assaciates Inc.
RE; ENGiNEERING C�STS; CITY �`UNI7ED INSTRU�vIENTATION
Deaz Mr_ Flora:
As ybu are a�vare, the City of Fzi.dley has added some additi.onal instrumentation to the
supervi.sory �ontrol and data acquisxk�on {SCADA.) s�stem project. The bid amount for khe City-
added z�strumentation is $51,850.
1'he U.S. Army has indicated that the engineeri�g costs to �repare plans and spe�;iiications for
the Ci.ty-added instrumentation should also be a City of Fridl�y cost. The enbineering cost
related to the City-addzd instrumez�tation is as follows:
lbi�ier Ste��art & Associat,�s, Ine.
Kaeding and Associates
'mI'AL
$ 399.10
1„j�6S•00
$1.,767.10
� The V�ater Dep�rtment's 1993 budget included $60,OOQ for instrumentakion. Th� hid price �or
I�he instrumentati.on plus the engi.neering casts re�ated to the instrumentation totals $53,61.7.10,
� nr appxoxiinately 10% under budget.
If you h��e any questi.ons regarding thxs submittal, please �ee1 free to ca11..
Sineerely,
A•iAIER STEWART & ASS�CIATNS, TNC.
� •� �
,. � � �
Ttzomas A. Roushar, P.E.
TAR: tp
a�o-i�_�.e
7959 S�OAN PLACE, SUiTE 200, ST. PAUL, MINN�SOTA 55117 812-774-6021
9800 SHElARO PARKWAY, SUfTE 1t12. MINNEAPOLIS, MtN11ESaTA 554d1 612•546-0432 • Equal Oppart�nity EmplDyer
i �
BiD FOR PROPOSALS
SUPERVISORY CONTROL & DATA AC�UISITION (SCADA), PROJECT NO. 259
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 1993, 11:00 AM A.M.
PLANHOLDER BID BOND TOTAL BID COMMENTS
Automatic Systems United Fire Cas. $376,850
2400 W County Rd D 5%
St Paul MN 55112
Bacon's Electric United Fire Cas $434,950
6525 Central Ave NE 5%
Minneapolis MN 55432
Killmer Electric United Fire Cas. $505,072
9702 85th Ave N 5°�
Maple Grove MN 55369
AutoCon, industries NO BiD
995 University Ave
St Paul MN 55104
Broadcast Comunication NO BID
307 Cemarron Rd
Apple Valley MN 55124
Dynamic Systems NO BID
6819 Washington Ave S
Minneapolis MN 55439
Feed-Rite Controls NO BID
3000 E Hennepin Ave
Minneapolis MN 55413
Instrument Control Systems NO BID
13005 16th Ave N, Suite 100
Plymouth MN 55441
Parsons Electric Co NO BID
917 5th Ave South
Minneapolis MN 55404
Twin City Electric NO BID
10724 Morgan Ave S
B(oomington MN 55431
Waldor Pump & Equipment NO BID
9700 Humbotdt Ave S
Minneapolis MN 55431
. -
i
39
��"m',I �'vI2 COivCUF�ZENCi; bk '1'iir Ll'1'Y Lvutv�:l:�
� —�
�.� 0{_ ,
FZZJCXEY September 13, 1994
l�lt:t':Lcb:;�
�pe of License: B� Approved By:
USED MOTOR VEHICLE �-
Minar Ford � Jerry Bostrom David Sallman �
1100 Silver Lk.Rd. . Director of Public Safety
New Brig.hton, MN 55112
Wilkins Dodge Inc. Kenneth G.Evans " •" "."
2755 Long Lk.Rd. .
Rosevi 11 e, ��IN 55113 �
Brookdale P1otors Inc. Wm. Bartram " " " ."
b121 8rooklyn Blvd.
Brooklyn Center, h1N 55429
_ Maaco Auto Painting & Leffel Inc. " " "
Auto Bodyworks � �
148 Osborrie Rd. N.E.
Fri dl ey, f�IN 55432 -
TEMPORARY FOOD
Grocery Hut Ken Jedneak �
1301 h1ississippi St.N.E. �
Fridley, MN 55432
TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR (2 licenses, one on 11-20-93 & one on 4-16-94)
� Totino-Grace High School Greg Balego � David Sallman ,
1350 Gardena Ave. Director of Public Safety
Fridley, P�IN 55432
Fees:
$150.00
$150.00
$150.00
�150.00
$30.00
$12Q.00
AUCTIONEER
. ,
Totino-Grace High School Greg Balego " " " Asking fees ta
1350 Gardena Ave. be waived
Fridley, MN 55432 � �
�■
41
0
�
�
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL LICENSES
C��� S�RVIC�S_
Rollins Heating 8r. AIC
2420 W Co Rd C
Roseville MN 55113-2594 Joyce Laird
�_R.AL CnNTRA�TOR-COMMERCI�L
Horwath Construction Co
4457 Hil�vale Ave N
Oakdale MN 55128- Geroge Horwath
Marco Ptoperty Management
80 E Minnesota Ave
Little Canada MN 55117-1736
Olson T J Inc
•Box 201622
Bloomington MN 55420-7622
-Tim Greeninger
Ted 01son
Steel James Construction
1410 Sylvan St
St Paul MN S51I7-4606 Dan McKay
��1VERA CONTRACTOR-RESiDENTIAL
Accord Home Builders (1492)
1273 Bucher Ave
Shoreview MN 55126-8605 Mark Peterson
Asphalt Specialties Co (5132)
15001 Hudson Blvd
PO Box 838
Lakeland MN 55043-0838 Erik Peterson
Bauer W F Construction (8869)
1080 VV Co Rd E
Shoreview MN 55126-8022 Waher Bauer
Bob's Sheetrock & Taping (6335)
726 Edmund Ave
St Paul MN 55104-2725 Robert Syse
Classic Home improvement (7353)
6012 Medicine Lake Rd
Crystal MN 55422-3330 Mark Price
41A
CLYDC WILEY
Bldg/Mech Insp
' TOM BLAZINA
Chief Btdg Ofcl
Same
Same
Same
STATE OF MINN
Same
Same
Same
Same
Dicks Fire 8r. Storm (2481)
864 19 Ave SE
Minneapolis MN 554I4-2504
Endura Construction Specialdes (2264)
636 Mendelssohn Ave N
Golden Valley 1V[N 55427-4306
Franzen Construction Co (2744)
4250 5 St NE
Columbia Heights MN 55421-2860
Kerchner Construction (4442)
3630 153 Ave N W
Andover MN 55304-3017
M S Interiors P(us (8210)
5445 Babcock Trl N206
Inver Grove Hgts MN 55077-1710
Marquis Inc (8439)
1556 McClung Dr
Arden Hills MN 55112-1950
Midwest Window Co (2130)
3739 Minnehat�a Ave S
Minneapolis MN 55406-2630
Northwest Masonry Inc (5452)
22022 7 St NE
Cedar MN 55011-9638
Redmond Roger �-iomes (1207)
11735 48 Pl
Plymouth MN 55442-2271
Weisenberger Construction (1847)
615 Russeil Ave N
Minneapolis MN 55411-3649
Westphal Roofing (3937)
8232 Greenwood Dr
Mounds View MN 55112-4616
Arnold Tabor
David Peterson
RobeR Franzen
Bill Kerchner
Mike Skouge
Mark Pignatello
Terry Shonblom
Steve Palmer
Joe Redmond
Terry Weisenberger
Roger Westphal
. :
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
HEATING
Anderson Heating & A/C
4347 Central Ave NE
Columbia Heights MN 55421-2925
MOBILE HOME INSTALLER
Gerrys Mobile Home Service (1701)
Rt 1 Box 592
Mora MN 55051-9201
Skis Transfer Inc (1b91)
2913 85 Ave NE
Blaine MN 55449-7222
PLUMBING
P & D Mechanical Contracting
4629 41 Ave N
Robbinsdale MN 55422-1802
Plymouth Plumbing Inc
6909 Winnetka Ave
Brooklyn Park MN 55428-1662
Property Repair Service Inc
4419 Nicollet
Minneapolis MN 555409-2034
RDC Plumbing Co
618 Railroad Dr
Elk River MN 55330-1454
WRECKING
J& D Enterprises of Duluth
5197 I,avaque Rd
Duluth MN 55803-9720
Ricky Anderson
Gerry Anderson
Dick Obrian
Bill Daugheriy
Ron Posterick
R Crawford
Robert Carpenter
Judie Cich
41C
CLYDE WILEY
Bldg/Mech Insp
STATE OF MINN
Same
STATE OF MINN
Same
Same
Same
THOMAS BLAZINA
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Propertv Owner
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
September 13, 1993
Address
DUPLEXES & SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS:
J. THOMAS & M. KOLODJSKI
JOHN GLENN
WAYNE THOMPSON
GEORGE LUNDE
MARVEY MAYER
ED-RAY BUILDERS
„
n
�,
„
n
n
�
�
n
NORMA WILLSON
FLOYD BRADLEY
GREGG HINZ
DONALD FINDELL
STEVEN MINDLIN
MOSTAFA MALEKA
KAREN & DOUGLAS HORNSTEN
S'TUART ANDERSON -
MAX PETERSON
GARY MUSKE
RODGER & LAVEARLE CAREY
STUART ANDERSON
NORMA WILLSON
J. ABBOTT & K. ROEHL
BRUCE HERRICK
AUREN KERNTOP
JOE & LYNN PILON
CONNIE RAJAMAMNAN �
D & S ELIAS
AL SCHIRO
D & S ELIAS
THOMAS SHIER
DON KLOSTREICH
MARITA LARSON
MARITA LARSON
ROBERT SHIMANSKI
JACQUELYN HORNER
CAROLE GADKE-BERGE
CAREY THAKE
JEROME DOLD
JEROME DOLD
Page 1
6400 ABLE ST
7325 ABLE ST ,
7339-41 ABLE ST
7401-03 ABLE ST
7431-33 ABLE Sf
7479-81 ABLE ST
7495-97 ABLE ST
7501-03 ABLE S'T
7513-15 ABLE ST
7527-29 ABLE ST
7539-41 ABLE ST
7553-55 ABLE ST
7565-67 ABLE ST
7579-81 ABLE ST
7595-97 ABLE ST
6444 BAKER ST _
6830 BROOKVIEW
6600-04 CENTRAL AVE
6640 CENTRAL AVE
7335-7 CENTRAL AVE
14U-42 CHARLES SI'
6190-92 E RIVER RD
6409 E RIVER RD
7320-22 EVERT CI'
1301-03 FIRESIDE DR
7857-61 FIRWOOD WAY
539 GLENCOE
401 IRONTON ST
4100 MAIN ST
4551 MAIN ST
5835 MAIN ST
5981-83 MAIN
5550 MEIST'ER RD
1240-42 NORTON AVE
1241-43 NORTON AVE
1250-52 NORTON AVE
1295-97 NORTON AVE
41 OSBORNE WAY
6315-17 PIERCE ST
6325-27 PIERCE ST
6335 PIERCE ST
6361 PIERCE ST
6389-91 PIERCE ST
1441-43 RICE ST
6100-02 STAR LN
6110-14 STAR LN
. �
LICEN8E8
No.of
Units Fee
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
i
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
12.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
September 13, 1993
Pronerty Owner
JEFFREY HARRIS
G & G BUILDING
ED & DORIS CHIES
�
J THOMAS & M KOLODJSKI
ROBERT HOSMAN
JUDITH ANN OSIECKI
JERRY & BARBRA MCNURLIN
PAUL SLESAR
AL BATES
EDWARD OTREMBA
NHC PROPERTIES
RONALD & PATRICIA NOLBY
JOSEPH SINIGAGLIO
THOMAS ZANDLO
RICHARD KAPPES
DOUGLAS FIEGE
ROLAND WI�iITCOMB
GARY MUSKE
MARK & BETH ZELENAK
CHRISTINE BATES
DOUGLAS FINCH
ROBERT HUBER
THOMAS GLIADON
DARYL KRECH
GARY MUSKE �
GARY MUSKE
W. THOMAS & G. SHIER
GARY MUSKE
ED CHIES
JUGAL AGARWAL
MULTIPLE DWELLINGS:
RIVERWOOD APARTMENTS
PREMIUM INVESTMENTS
„
MARLISS WESTENFIELD
S SEVERSON & J KOCH
FIVE SANDS DEVELOPMENT
n
,�
�
��
LEONARD DAILEY
TED BIGOS
ARNOLD ELMQUISI'
RICHARD DEMPSEY
Address
Page 2
6160-64 STAR LN
6421-23 STARLTTE CIR
7373-75 UNIV AVE
7337-39 UNIV AVE
7389 VAN BUREN ST
5940-42 2ND ST
6001-03 2ND ST
5936-38 2ND ST
5780-90 2 1/2 ST
5783-5 2 1/2 ST
5057 3RD ST'
5141-43 3RD ST
5181-83 3RD ST
5191-93 3RD ST
5330-34 4TH S'I'
5370 4TH ST
5461 4TH sT
5830-32 4TH ST
5850-52 4TH ST .
5940 4TH SI'
5373-75 STH ST
6262-64 STH ST
5335-37 6TH ST
5381-83 6TH ST
1313-23 73RD AVE
1581-83 73RD AVE
1591-93 73RD AVE
1580-84 73 1/2 AVE
1590-94 73 1/2 AVE
360-62 74TH AVE
370-72 74'TH AVE
5960-80 ANNA ST
6551 CHANNEL RD
6571 CHANNEL RD
6551 E RIVER RD
7673 E RIVER RD
7805 E RIVER RD
7825 E RIVER RD
7845 E RIVER RD
7875 E RIVER RD
7895 E RIVER RD
8191 E RIVER RD
5101 HORIZON DR
6417 HWY 65
6341 HWY 65
41E
LICENBEB
No.of
Units Fee
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
33
11
11
11
4
59
59
59
59
59
5
5
7
10
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
24.U0
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12.(f0
12.00
24.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
24.00
12,00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
24.00
91.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
36.00
143.00
143.00
143.00
143.00
143.00
3b.00
36.00
36.00
49.00
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
September 13, 1993
Propert�Owner
ARNO & MARJORIE ROSIN
S & S INVESTMENT
M
LAURENCE & KAREN RUSSELL
RICHARD & SUZANNE FEIST
ROBERT & KATHLEEN ANDRES
ACCAP
SR INVESTMENT
DONALD KEEFE
DAVID HERYLA
THOMAS WOLFF
JOHN WEATHERLY
Mr. & Mrs. BENKSTEIN
MOSI'AFA MALEKI
ARNOLD ASPENSON
R SMITH & J WEBER
S & A DEVELOPMENT
JOHN CONDA
JERRY 8c BARBARA MCNURLIN
R GESINO & L EPPERLY
„
ROGER BLESI
ARNOLD ELMQUIST
„
TED BIGOS
�
„
„
„
n
��
��
E NORWOOD & B BRAI'TI-IWAITE
WILLARD GUIMONT
RICHARD & NANCI ANDERSON
ARNOLD ELMQUIST
JIM WEATHERLY
NAEEM QURESHI
LAURETTA WELTER
JAMES PENG
BIGOS PROPERTY
��
JOHN BLAHOSKI
OTTY PROPERTIES
JERRY DOLD
Address
Page 3
7400 LYRIC LN
5475 MAIN ST
5495 MAIN ST
6011 MAIN ST
6021 MAIN ST
117 M�SS PL
137 MISS PL
1284=96 NORTON AVE
201 SATELLITE LN
5761 2ND ST
5770 2ND ST
5830 2ND ST
5848 2ND ST
5866 2ND ST
6501 2ND ST
6551 2ND ST
5770 2 1/2 ST
5800 2 1R ST
5820 2 1/2 S'T .
5900 2 1/L ST
5908 2 1/2 ST
5916 2 1iL ST
5924 2 1/2 ST
4901 3RD ST
4913 3RD ST
4921 3RD ST
4939 3RD ST
4949 3RD ST
5200 3RD ST
5201 3RD ST
5230 3RD ST
5231 3RD ST.
5260 3RD ST �
5261 3RD ST
5290 3RD ST
5291 3RD ST
5974 3RD ST
5980 3RD ST
6061-63-65 3RD ST
6393 3RD ST
5401 4TH ST
5600-06 4TH ST
5370 STH ST
5428 STH ST
215 53RD AVE
305 53RD AVE
105 58'TH AVE
110 61ST AVE
290 61ST AVE
41F
LICEN8E8
No.of
Units Fee
8
12
12
4
4
4
4
7
11
3
8
4
8
4
3
7
11
4
4
7
7
7
7
�
7
7
7
7
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
4
4
3
7
4
4
3
4
4
7
7
8
3
49.(�
49.00
49.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
49.00
36.00
49.00
36.00
49.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
49.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36,00
36.00
36.00
36.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
49.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.Q0
49.00
36.00
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
September 13, 1993
ProQerty Owner
RICE CRK TOWNHOUSE CO
«
RICE CRK TOWNHOUSE CO
�
RICE CRK TOWNHOUSE CO
n
»
M
n
�
�
�
N
„
��
„
�
��
,�
. „
„
p
��
N
�
n
�
EDWARD ANDERSON
STELI.AR INC.
GARY RESHETAR
BUILDING MANAGEMENT
BEHUN & PE'TERSON
JAMES ISLER
S. SEVERSON & J. KOCH
D-62 PROPERTIES
AUREN KERNTOP
CONDOMINIUMS:
JOSEPH & JENNY $IDWELL
ANGELINE SEWALL
ROLAND & BELLE RAE KRUEGER
LYLE CHRISTIE
ADELE & ROGER GORMAN
JAMES & DEBBIE COX
D MERTENS & S WINKELS
SCHWIETERS & ASSOC.
LINDBERG INVESTMENTS
Address
Page 4
_ T565-7-9-71-5-7 68'I'fi
1566-8-7-0-2-4-6 68T'H
157&80-2-4-6-8 b8TH
1579-80-3-5-7-9 68'1'H
1590-2-4-6 68T'H AVE .
1591-3-5-7 68'I'H AVE
1600-2-4-6-8-10 68'I'H
1601-3-5-7-9-11 68'I'H
1612-4-6-8 68T�-I AVE
1613-5-7-9 68TH AVE
1620-2-4-6-&30 68'I'H
1623-25-27-29-31 681'H
1632-4-6-8 68TT-i AVE
1633-5-7-9 68'I'H AVE
1640-2-4-6-8-50 68TH
1641-3-5-7-9-51 68'I'H
1652-4-6-8 fi8TH AVE
1653-5-7-9 68TH AVE
1600-2-4-6=8-70 68'TH �
1661-3-5-7-9�71 68TH
1672-4-6-8-80-2 68T'H
1673-5-7-9-81-3 681�I
1560-2-4-6-8-70 69'I'H
1590-2-4-6 69'TH AVE
I600-2-4-6 69TH AVE
1630-2-4-6-8-40 69'TH
1650-2-4-6-8 69'TH
1200 72ND AVE
1250 72ND AVE
1441 73RD AVE
1619 73RD AVE
351 74TH AVE
389 74TH AVE
106 77TH WAY
211 79TH WAY
321 79TH WAY
1601 N. INNSBRUCK DR
#I12
# 141
# 153,356
#208
#237,282,355
#273
#274
#275
#308,353,363
41G
I.ICENSES
No.of
Units Fee
6
6
6
6
4
4
6
6
4
4
6
6
4
4
6
6
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
�
4
6
5
42
29
18
24
11
11
4
8
8
1
1
2
I
3
1
1
1
3
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
3b.U0
36.Q0
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
3b.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
3b.t?0
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
36.00
109.00
83.00
61.00
73.00
49.00
49.00
36.00
49.00
49.00
12.00
12.00
24.00
12.00
36.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
36.00
41H
'FOR CONCORRENCE BY THE CITY COIINCIL ESTIMATES
F�� _ SEPTEMBER 13, 1993
Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered
301 Fridley Plaza Office Building
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Statement for Services Rendered
as City Prosecuting Attorney for
the Month of July, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,207.50
Northwest Asphalt
1451 County Road 8
Shakopee, MN 55379
Street Reconstruction Program
Project No. ST. 1993 - 1& 2
Estimate No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 237,137.34
Isaacson Lawn Care
10515 County Road 116
Rogers, MN 55374
Lake Pointe Maintenance
Project No. 244
Estimate No. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,497.36
Gunderson Brothers Cement Contracting
2235 Snelling Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55404
Miscellaneous Concrete Curb,
Gutter and Sidewalk
Project No. 245
Estimate No. 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ �98.25
42