The URL can be used to link to this page

09/06/1994 - 4928' U TY OF FIZIDL EY FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING ATTENDENCE SHEET Tuesday, September 6, 1994 7:30 P.M. PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS ITEM NUMBER , r-� % ) ^ l� t' ' �r' � � /(.� „ �- ! , � �fi�'l�� ifG�.-. �`�= �•-� r� � � /r ��-CcL.-T G ��}.� 3� �. . � � ` /�u /i�= (� ' � , � , -/C� �- � �� ,�� ,�-..�-��.,� � d�4.�'1 � S �� e r �7 � S t� N C. r ' �,_ / �/ ,/ � . � ��,� ,�.` '•Z /� � ��'Y"L�-'G� i,o /V i � � ar� o� w�►rne� ` `f �3�f `,� S-� il�� a-�' .. � - � � ��!'/1�✓ � �, f"'� � � �;--; � __...--�---- � � �� , �, ,� -.� :,� , �....--- ` '� S% 3c� ,�'��,4�� `?� r-'i ��J � , . �� Z ? _ _ � �~ � - ,� � +/��c.vr✓ i �L`�l2/ �� .Z _ J __ %s 7`Ll.. C � 2�-G �'!� !l� � . �C r � � oF FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FRIDLEY SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: PROCLAMATION: Constitution Week - September 17 - 23, 1994 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: City Council Meeting of August 15, 1994 ADOPTION OF AGENDA: OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: Request to Amend Chapter 213 of the Fridley City Code (Fences), by Certified Auto Recovery (1l1/ard 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 1 G Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes. FRIDLEY CfTY COUNCIL ME�TING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Assessment Estimate on Street Improvement Project - Main Street, Project No. ST. 1994 - 8 (Ward 3) ......................................... 2-2F OLD BUSINESS: Special Use Permit Request, SP #94-03, by Gordon Hedlund, to Allow Construction in the CRP-2 District (Flood Fringe), Generally Located on the South Side of Buffalo Street East of Riverview Terrace (Ward 3) (Tabled July 25, 1994); and, Special Use Permit Request, SP #94-04, by Gordon Hedlund, to Allow Construction in the CRP-2 District (Flood Fringe), Generally Located on the South Side of Cheryl Street West of Broad Avenue (Ward 3) (Tabled July 25, 1994); and, Special Use Permit Request, SP #94-05, by Gordon Hedlund, to AIlow Construction in the CRP-2 District (Flood Fringe), Generally Located on the North Side af Dover Street West of Broad Avenue , (Vllard 3) (Tabled July 25, 1994) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 3K s'. � e�. k-� �� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 NEW BUSINESS: Page 3 Resolution Adopting a "Proposed" Budget for the Fiscal Year 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .� 4 - 4B Resolution Certifying "Proposed" Tax Levy Requirements for 1995 to the County of Anoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 5A Receive an Item frorn the Planning Commission Meeting of August 10, 1994: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 6X A. Resolution Approving a Subdivision, Lot Split, L.S. #94-03, to Split Two Properties into Four Separate Parcels, Generally Located at 1476 and 1490 - 64th Avenue N.E. (By Timothy Strong of Strong Built Homes) (Ward 2) Establish a Public Hearing for September 19, 1994, for a Plat Request, P.S. #94-05, by Keith Eibensteiner for Biltmore Construction of New Brighton, Inc., to Subdivide Property Generally Located in the Southeast Corn�r of the Totino-Grace High � School Property at 1350 Gardena Avenue N.E. (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 7B FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 Page 4 NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED): Receive an Item from the Appeals Cammission Meeting of August 23, 1994: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 - 8Q A. Variance Request, VAR #94-21, by Imaginality, Inc., for Meadow Run Apartments, to Reduce the Setback of a Sign from the Property Line from 10 Feet to 0 Feet to Allow the Construction of a New Sign Generally Located at 7855 East River Road (Ward 3) Approve Service Contract with Anoka County Community Action Program for Administration of Home Improvement Grant Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 9P Resolution Approving Anoka County Community Action Program Leasehold Cooperative Tax Status in Hyde Park (Wards 1 and 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 - 10K Appoint City Representative to the National Organization on Disability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 NEW BUSlNESS (CONTINUED�: Page 5 Receive Bids on Personal Computers for the City of Fridley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 - 12A Resolution Authorizing the Use of Credit Eards as a Method of Payment for City Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 - 13A Receive Petitions from Burlington Northern Railroad and Murphy Warehouse Company for Water Service Instaliation (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 - 14D Approve Change Order No. i for Emergency Repair of Well No. 1, Project No. 269 (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 - 15B Approve Change Order No. 1 to Commons Park Shelter Project No. 267 (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 - 16A FRIDLEY CITY COUNCiL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 Page ! NEW BUSINESS �CONTINUED�: Resolution Requesting the Posting of "No Turns on Red" at the Intersection of Highway 65 and County Road 35 ..................:........... .... 17-17A Appointment: City Employee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Informal Status Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Claims .......................................... 20 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 - 21 C Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 - 22M Establish a Public Hearing for October 3, 1994, for a Liquor License for The Sharx Club/Sharx Sports Bar, 3710 East River Road ADJOURN: • �onstitutiun �ee� - September 17 - 23, 1994 William J. Nee Mayor fridleY, MN. �W�I�t�AS, OuK�ouKdikg�atRexs, SeCUAedtReb2essiKc�so{� QibeX.ty {foKtRe.�SeQIYes akd �ututie gekeh.atio�,s by estab�isRikg a L'o►astitutiok {�ox tQe Ukited States o{�.�4w�.e�.ic,ct; akd �Wd��t2�}lS, it is o� tR.e �tieatest iwtpoxta�ce tRat a2e citiZexs �u�ey uKdexstaKd tRe pKODiseoks akd p�ikCip�eS ik t�.e CoKstitutiok ik oAdex to suppokt, pKeseAVe, akd de{�ekd it ac�ai�st a2Q eue,w�ies; akd �Wd�I��S, tRe 207tR akKiuexsaKy o{� tRe SigkiKc� o{� tRe C,'okstitut�o� pKOtrides a RistoAic oppoatuk�ty {�oA aee .�4►�ex�eaKs to Kea�ize t9�e ae�ie.�e,w�eHts o{� tRe �xaw�.eAS o�- tRe Co�.stitutiok akd tRe KigRts, pAivi2e.�es, akd Kespo�.sibi�ities it a{��oKds; akd �Wd�l�t2�}lS, tRe iKdepe.�dekee c�uaxaKteed to .�l►Kexicak eitize,�s, w�etR.ex bt� bixtR o►� katuaaQiZatiok, s9�ou�d be ceQebKate.d by appKOpAiate eexe,�wkies akd aetiUities; .1�o�w, Ta��t�=.�or2�, � rrr�so�� tRat r, ��5 �. s�R��.�, Mayo� �o T� o{� tR.e C.'�ty o{� ��d2�y R�x�y pKOC2a�►� tRe W�k o� S�t�e� i7 tR,�ou�� 23, 1994, as �onstitution �ee� ik tRe C3ity o{� �tiid�ey. I uK�e a�e �itizeKs to tie�-Qeet duKiKc� t9�at ureel2 ok tRe w�aKy beke{�its o{� ouA �'e.de�aQ L'o�.stitutiok aKd .�iw�e�icak citize,�sRip. �JI(�WC�I��SS ��I��O�, I �ave set w�y 9�aKd aKd eause.d tRe sea2 0{� tRe L'ity o{� �tiidQey to be a{�{�ixe.d tRis 6tR. day o{� Septe.w�bex, 1994. Dennis L. Schneider, Mayor Pro Tem THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF AUG�ST 15, 1994 , The Regular Meeting of. the Fridley City Council was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Nee. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance . .. ... . ..�.to•°�he �Fi�ag: . .. . . .. , . . ... . ... . _. , ..... : .. . „. . . . . . ... . � . .... ... . . ... . . . ROLL CALL• MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: PROCLAMATION• Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Billings, Councilman Schneider ancl Counci.lwoman �� Bolkcom � � � � None FOURMIES LIBERATION DAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1994: Mr. Burns, City Manager, read this proclamation proclaiming the 50th Anniversary of the Liberation of Fourmies., France, the City of Fridley's Sister City. Mayor Nee issued the proalamation and extended congratulations to the citizens of Fourmies, along with best wishes for many more generations of peace, prosperity, and freedom. He stated that the French flag will be flown at the Municipal Center for a week commencing September 2, 1994. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, AU6UST 1, 1994: MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt the agenda as submitted. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. OPEN FORUM, VISITORS: There was no response from the audienee under this item of business. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AIIGUST 15, 1994 PAGE 2 OLD BUSINESS• 1. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #.94-11, BY NEW HORIZON.CHILD CARE, TO ALLOW AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE FRONT YARD IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PLAY AREA IN THE FRONT YARD GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1202 EAST MOORE LAKE DRIVE N.E. (TABLED AUGUST 1, 1994)• Mayor Nee removed this item from the table. Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this variance is for New Horizon Child Care at the Moore Lake Shopping Center. She stated that New Horizon Child Care is proposing to occupy the westerly tenant space in the shopping center to operate a day care cen.ter. She stated that the:petitioner's original proposal was that the playground be located im the front yard setback area. Ms. Dacy stated that at the last Council meeting, Council expressed a number of safety concerns about the location of the pla�r area, and they requested that the petitioner rev.ise the.site plan. She stated that the site plan has been revised, and the playground equipment will be located immediately adjacent to the west end of the building. She stated that the parking lot would be revised., the driveway would be modified, and a stop sign reinstalled. She stated that she believed, with the new site plan, that the traffic pattern is actually improved and that it better defines the inter- section. She stated that based on the revised site.plan, staff recommends that Council approve the variance .subject to stipula- tions, which she outlined. Councilman Schneider asked if the concrete curb would be. replaced along the entire fence line. Ms. Dacy stated that she understands everything would be lined with concrete curb and gutter. � Mr. Blumentals, architect for New Horizon Child Care Center, stated that there is no question that.there will be a concrete curb. He stated that he wished to recognize Councilman Billings' suggestions which were used in preparation of the revised site plan. Councilman Schneider stated that this site plan is much.better, and he is pleased with the changes and felt it was an excellent proposal. He stated that his concern was for safety and aesthetics, and these issues have been addressed. Councilwornan Jorgenson stated that she was pleased the petitioner was able to locate the pTay area adjacent to the day care center. She felt that this would be beneficial for both the day care center and the children. Councilman Billings stated that he would be hard pressed to find anything against the proposal. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15 1994 PAGE 3 MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the Appeals Commis- sion recommendation and grant Variance Request, VAR #94-11, by New Horizon Child Care, with the following stipulations: (1) the peti- tioner shall relocate and replant the existing evergreen trees in the front yard setback, and replace the concrete curb around the setback area; (2) if the tenant abandons the tenant space, the play structure and the hard play surface shall be removed and replaced . . . . , . ,..wi.th.. �.od�.; ...(.3 ). :th� ..�?et�.tio.nex' ,,�hal l cqnt,act: :�h�. Pub1i.� .inlor�s ..D�pax�,- . . _ . . ment and review the proposed construction methods around the fire hydrant and over the storm sewer line; (4) reinstall the stop sign in the front yard setback area; and (5) a concrete curb shall be installed along the driveway and the playground. Seconded by .:. Councilwaman Jorgenson. Upon a voice�vote, all voting aye; Mayor � � Nee �declared � the mo�iorr��carried unanimously; � � � �� - • ' . �� NEW BUSINESS• 2. PRESENTATION OF THE 1995 PRELIMINARY DRAFT BUDGETS: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, presented the 1995 preliminary draft budgets in accordance with Chapter 7 of the City Charter. He stated that the 1995 budget reflects a 1.7 percent increase over 1994. He stated that the General Fund increased 6.5 percent, while all budgeted funds, which includes the Enterprise Funds, reflect a 3.7 percent increase over 1994. He stated that the budget does not include any property tax levy increase.. Councilman Schneider asked what funds would be used to cover the increase. Mr. Pribyl stated that revenue from user fees or fund balances from other years would cover the proposed increase. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked Mr. Pribyl to explain the Enterprise Funds for the public's information. Mr. Pribyl stated that these were the water, sewer, storm water, and liquor funds. Mr. Burns stated that even though there is no increase in the property tax levy, it is possible that the appraised value of property may increase which would, in turn, affect the property tax. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to receive the 1995 preliminary draft budgets. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 3. RESOLUTION NO. 65-1994 DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE SEPTEMBER 13 1994 STATEWIDE PRIMARY ELECTION: Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that this resolution desig- nates polling places and appoints election judges for the primary FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15. 1994 PAGE 4 election on September 13, 1994. He stated that an increase is requested for the judges from $6.00 to $7.00 per hour and from $7.00 per hour to $7.50 per hour for the head judges. He stated that the County is subsidizing a portion of the increase to attract qualified judges. He stated that it is becoming difficult to obtain election judges, and some of the judges have been involved with the elections for many years. He stated that it is hoped the .. . .i�e��ase...�wil l ..�-elp . �in . rec�u�t.ing....jia.dges _ -. H.e ,.�stated� t�iat� an}rone interested in becoming an election judge may contact him. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 65-1994. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a.voice vote, all voting aye,.Mayor Nee declared.the,;motion.car.ried,�nanimQUSly. ., _ 4. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A REZONING RE4UEST ZOA #94-02, BY FORREST HARSTAD OF TWIN CITY TOWNHOMES TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM R-1, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING TO R-3 GENERAL MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF 41 TOWNHOMES GENERALLY LOCATED AT 971 HILLWIND ROAD N E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this praperty is located at the end of Polk Street, on the east side of Hillwind Road, and extends to Fillmore Street. She stated that the property is currently zoned R-3 and R-1. She stated that adjacent zoning and uses to the north are R-2 and public zoning to the west where the wetland is located. She stated that there is an R-3 zoning to the northwest for the existing apartments. To the south is the Western Ridge Estates plat and eight townhomes which are zoned R-2. She stated that to the east and northeast of the site is a mixture of single family uses and North Park Elementary School. Ms. Dacy stated that at the public hearing, it was suggested that the petitioner purchase Lot 9 of Auditor's Subdivision, and she understands that this has been done. She stated that the total site is 5.87 acres, and 41 condominium units are proposed to be constructed east of the wetland area. She stated that to the west of the wetland, the petitioner is proposing to construct a five- unit building on Hillwind Road and to create a separate lot for a duplex. Ms. Dacy stated that the petitioner submitted a plan which showed that this parcel could accommodate a six story apartment building containing 104 units. Ms. Dacy stated that the proposal is to rezone 2.12 acres from R-1 to R-3. About 3.75 acres of the property is already zoned R-3. She stated that in reviewing this rezoning request, the Planning Commission determined that the proposal is consistent with the R-3 requirements, and all conditions are met with exception of the variance. She stated that the Appeals Commission has recommended approval of the variance request. She stated that the zoning and use. is consistent with adjacent uses with the exception of the FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL ME$TING OF AIIGIIST 15 1994 PAGE 5 Frank home. She stated that North Park Elementary School provides separation from the single family area to the east and similar units abut this site to the north and south. Ms. Dacy stated that the Flanning Commission recommended approval of this rezoning request with four stipulations, three of which relate to approval of the variance, vacation, and the plat. .,._ .. . . . ..: .... .:. ,� ...... >.:.. . ..._.. ., ,. .. . .. . • , < , . . . . .. . . Councilman Schneider stated that access was an issue, and he asked if there was any further information. Ms. Dacy stated that staff.reviewed the advantages and disadvan- : � tages � o-f cons�ructi•ng �a drive -t�ro�gh Lot � � ..� �. � She . s�ated � that . �he 'advantage is that it would provide a second access to the develop- ment. She stated that, however, of concern is the safety and design of the roadway. If a driver does not respond quickly enough, a car could continue off the drive and over the retaining wall that is necessary. She stated that there would be a tight turn off of Hillwind Road. During icy conditions, this may create an unsafe condition. She stated that the slope would be 10.5 percent and for safety purposes, driveway grades should be Zess than ten percent. She stated that staff felt that the safety issues out-weigh the advantage of a second access. She stated that 37 units will be served from the acCess to Fillmore Street, but that is not excessive. Mayor Nee asked how traffic from this development interacts with other traffic in the area. Ms . Dacy stated that the main access is on Fillmore Street, and motorists would probably use Polk Street or Regis Lane to exit the area. She stated that about 240 trips per day would be created by this development. The normal capacity is 1,000 trips, so it would not overburden the local streets. ShE stated that during the morning peak hours, traffic is backing up on Polk Street `and testi- mony from the public hearing is that motorists use Matfierhorn Drive �o Gardena Avenue in order to avoid that intersection. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there were 3, 400 cars a day that go out on Polk Street and 1,500 on Lynde Drive. She stated that there are about six hundred cars a day on Regis Lane to Matterhorn Drive. Ms. Dacy stated that at Old Central and Hathaway Lane, it is over three thousand vehicles per day. She stated that on Fillmore Street and Regis Lane the traffic counts are below the one thousand trips per day. She felt that the concern is the congestion at Hathaway Lane and Old Central Avenue. Councilman Schneider stated that if this property is developed as it is now zoned, even by conservative figures, there would be the same number of units. He questioned what steps the City could take to provide better access. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15. 1994 PAGE 6 Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that because of the close proximity to the I-694 access ramps, there is not a lot that can be done to improve the traffic. She stated that she is not sure if there is more traffic from single family dwellings or townhomes. Ms. Dacy stated that the traffic is about the same for either apartments or townhomes. .:._ . . . . . . . . . _ . .. . . . .. ... .. .. . .. . . ... . . . . .. . .. ... . . , .. . . � .. .. . . _ . . . . . .. _ Mayor Nee asked if the sewer and water lines in the area were capable of handling this development. - Mr. Flora, Public Works director, stated that the sewer and water � -� � ii'ne� �are s�f€icien�t to� ha�►dle� �this��roposed deve3•opment�: -� � ~_-• �� - � Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that there is a high water table in this area. Most of the homes on Lynde Drive have sump pumps, but she believed there would be sufficient space on this site for ponding. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated she would prefer that the zoning remain as R-1 and that single family homes be constructed to maintain the character of the neighborhood. She stated that she did not believe it would be economically feasible to construct a six story, 104 unit apartment bui,lding. Councilman Schneider stated that he would concur with Councilwoman Jorgenson's opinion. However, if it is not possible to develop this property as R-1, he wondered if the City would be better off with a forty unit rental building as opposed to 40 owner-occupied units. He stated that this area is intensely developed now with apartments. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she did not know if these town- homes would remain owner-occupied. She stated that other townhomes in the City have now become rental units. Councilman Schneider stated that because of the townhouse associa- tion, the units have to be properly maintained whether they are rentals or owner-occupied. Mr. Forrest Harstad, the petitioner and developer, stated that he would like to address the concerns about owner-occupancy. He stated that he would like to live in these townhomes. He said that they will be of the same value as single family homes. He stated that the townhomes are self-policing, and it is especially true when this is a neighborhood community which tends to occur with this cul-de-sac design. Mayor Nee asked if a 104 unit apartment building was constructed, would there would be more residents than in the townhomes? Mr. Harstad stated that these townhomes are sold predominately to single persons. He stated that only about one-third are couples, FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETIN� OF AUGUST 15 1994 PAGE�7 and less than five percent of the units have one or two children. He stated that he really did not know if there would be a higher density in an apartment complex. Mayor Nee stated that the average density in the townhomes would be about 1-1/2 to two persons per unit. - : .. .. �: :.:, :., ..:.... .. : ...-. . . ...... .. ... .: . . ... �....: ,: �• . ; . � - � � • . � s :• �� C �sr�e �`�i�tci��ililey; � 101i�'"' �;yride � �Drive, stated that she has no objection to the townhomes, but the traffic pattern is terrible in that area. She stated that she understands that the residents living in the more expensive homes on Matterhorn Drive would not be pleased with the additional traffic. She stated that traffic . .is heavy on Gar.dena.Avenue, especially wheri schbol:is in session. � Slie stated that sYie would like something done with the street pattern. Mr. Norman Rausch, 1031 Lynde Drive, stated that the intersection at Highway 65 and Hathaway Lane is congested now, and she cannot imagine what it will be like with additional traffic. She stated that there is always concern about the flooding situation. Councilman Schneider stated that eventually something will develop on this parcel. He asked Mr. Rausch if he felt this development proposal is reasonable. Mr. Rausch felt it is acceptable, if something is worked out regarding the intersection. Councilman Schneider stated that he does not know if this is possible, but the situation that exists now is that someone could construct a 104 unit apartment building on this site. He stated that Council can approve this development or gamble on a future situation. Councilman Schneider stated that there was some discussion about modification of the intersection at Highway 65 in conjunction with development of the Lake Pointe site. Mr. Flora stated that the design was to improve Hillwind Road and to allow traffic to use Hillwind Road all the way to Hathaway Lane. He stated that the design allowed for two left hand turns and one right turn. He felt that the improvement would benefit this intersection. He stated that the improvement was tied in with the Lake Pointe development. Councilwoman Jorgenson felt that perhaps not allowing a right turn on red at this intersection would help the traffic congestion. She stated that, as it is now, this is only in effect during certain hours. Mr. Flora stated that the City would have to make a request to the Minnesota Department of Transportation to determine if this would be allowed. i. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15. 1994 PAGE 8 Mr. Al Fehn, developer of the Western Ridge Estates development, stated that there seems to be a feeling that Mr. Harstad's develop- ment has too much density. He stated that he is in favor of the proposed project as proposed, but he wondered if it may be possible to reduce the density. He felt that perhaps the quality of the units could be upgraded and the density reduced. � ...,.. �.•.....: . _.. _ .. .... .. :• .... .�.. : .. . �. , �Ir`. � Iiarstad' stat�cl� tFia� �because' of' �the"'�d�eiYiog'rapYiics' 'of��fiis"'piece of property, they have concluded that a more expensive unit is not viable on this parcel of land. He stated that he would not con- ' struct the duplex if he would not have to purchase Lot 9. � � =•°° • • . � Co�nc��lmar� �ctrne�ider .stated. � that, i�m � � ti��e past, he stood - firm �r� �� denying a rezorting� at Highway 65 and Mississippi Street. Even- tually single family homes were developed on the site; however, that property was zoned exclusively R-l. He felt that in this case both the City staff and the developer concur that an apartment building is very viable on the R-3 property. He stated that given these facts, he felt the townhomes are certainly an excellent de- velopment and the best proposal he has seen for the property. He felt that the traffic issue needed to be resolved in a more com- prehensive manner. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance on first reading, with the following stipulations: (1) Variance Request, VAR #94-02, shall be approved; (2) Plat Request, P.S. #94-04, shall be approved; (3) Vacation Request, SAV #94-02, shall be approved; and (4) the rezoning request is contingent upon the site plan dated June 23, 1994 as submitted by the petitioner. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, Councilman Schneider, Councilman Billings, Councilwoman Bolkcom, and Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion. Councilwoman Jorgenson voted against the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote. 5. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A VACATION REQUEST SAV #94-02, BY FORREST HARSTAD OF TWIN CITY TOWNHOMES TO VACATE A PORTION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 971 HILLWIND ROAD N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this vacation request is to vacate a portion of Hillwind Road that was part of a turn-back. 5he stated that the size of the area to be vacated is 30,439 square feet. Ms. Dacy stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the vacation request subject to combining this area with the rest of Mr. Harstad's development, which the plat accomplishes. Councilman Schneider asked how the property is conveyed to the developer, Mr. Harstad. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15. 1994 PAGE 9 Ms. Dacy stated that once the City vacates the property and actu- ally owns it, it has to be declared excess in order for it to be conveyed. She stated that in ano�her case,�directly adjacent to this property, a portion of the right-of-way was vacated in order to be added to a development. She stated that it was her under- standing that there was no charge for the conveyance. "' �� ' � ' �' Mr.� `AT "�'ehn��stat'e3` t�iat �fi� �'r�c�ived `'vaca'ted""rigYi`�-of�wa'y' 'w�iicfi`��wa��' ' � "�' �"' added to h'is development, Western Ridge Estates. He stated that he did not pay anything for the property. It was simply a matter of being willing to assume the responsibility for the property. He stated that the amount he received was about 10,000 square fe.et.. . Councilwoman Schneider stated that he did not have a problem if the property can be legally conveyed. Mr. Gregg Herrick, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the City owns the parcel and can do what they want with it. He stated that it could be sold to the a�djoining property owner. Councilman Billings asked what the procedure would be if this was typical right-of-way in the City for an alley or street that was vacated. Ms. Dacy stated that the ordinance process would be completed to declare.it excess, and the vacated portion would be added to the abutting property. Councilman Billings stated that under normal circumstances where there is a vacation, the vacated parcel would go to the adjoining property at no cost. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance on first reading. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon. a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 6. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE SALE THEREOF (TWIN CITY TOWNHOMES;: MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading and approve the ordinance on first reading. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 7. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT REQUEST, P.S. #94-04, BY FORREST HARSTAD OF TWIN CITY TOWNHOMES TO REPLAT PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 971 HILLWIND ROAD N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this plat would create three lots. She stated that the stipulations for FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 1�5, 1994 PAGE 10 approval of the plat are divided into two main areas, as the City Attorney's office has advised that the City enter into a develop- ment agreement, and certain information should be included in the condominium declaration. Ms. Dacy stated that because of the change in the plat from the June 20, 1994 Council meeting with the addition of the two-unit `� �' � ' ��bui�T�ding�,"�°staff' completecf'�anotYie"r "'review:�� '"STie� stated°it"'is'°r'ecom=�� '�"" `� � ' mended that a cul-de-sac be constructed at the end of Polk Street to provide access to the two-unit building. She stated that it is her understanding that the cost for constructing the cul-de-sac would be $30,�000 to $35,000, and the petitioner does object to this . . requirem�nt : . _. .. , : . . . . .: . . , , . . ' . Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the primary purpose of the cul-de-sac is to provide a turn-around for plows and emer- gency vehicles. Councilman Billings stated that the real estate office would probably have as great or a greater benefit than the Harstad development. He questioned if it is appropriate to have the developer incur these costs or to accomplish the improvement through an assessment project. Councilwoman Jorgenson felt that this probably should be accom- plished through an assessment project. Mr. Harstad,_the petitioner and developer, stated that he believes the cost for the cul-de-sac is exorbitant. He stated that the City is now plowing snow to the east side of the street, and this will still exist. He felt that Sundial Realty would prefer to have the snow pushed off to the side rather than pay for the cul-de-sac. He stated that he would rather not build the duplex. If the cul- de-sac is necessary, he felt that the City should pay sixty percent and he should pay forty percent of the cost. Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that at some point in time, the cul- de-sac may be needed, and she believed the real estate office would benefit from this improvement. Mr. Harstad felt that this aption should be left open when redevel- opment occurs. He stated that the duplex could not be built until such time that this is addressed, and he could not viably build those two units because of the bad soil conditions. He stated that the parcel will not be developed in the near future because of the cost to prepare the site. Mr. Flora stated that the developer can petition the City for the street when he wishes to construct the duplex. Ms. Dacy stated that if the Council approves the plat, it is sub- ject to the Anoka County Recorder's Office and Surveyor's Office FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AIIGUST 15, 1994 PAGE 11 approving the final mylars. She stated that when this is completed, it will be brought back to Council so that the final plat may be reviewed. Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Harstad if he would provide the necessary right-of-way for the cul-de-sac. Mr. Harstad stated that he would gladly provide the right-of-way, but at that time, he may ... . . .._ . ._ �hav� �• a..:prob'lem �-wf th: ,:setbarCl�s :° L .. ,., : .:. :. ...._� . . . .. . .. . . .. . .. .• . . .. . . . ._. ..... _... Councilman Billings asked if an easement for the right-of-way would affect the setbacks. Ms. Dacy stated that it would not. Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if there was additional �landscaping proposed to screen�the home directly north of this development.� Ms. Dacy stated that this was considered in the landscaping, and spruce trees would be planted. ' Councilman Billings stated that he would suggest that language be added to Stipulation�No. 6 that "prior to requesting a buildi.ng permit for the duplex at the end of Polk Street, the petitioner shall petition t,he City for construction of said cul-de-sac and assess costs to benefitting properties." He stated that it would be the intent that the duplex be constructed whether or not the City Council, at that time, wishes to construct the cul-de-sac. Ms. Dacy stated that Stipulation No. 10 referring to Outlot A was a carry-over from the Planning Commission meeting. She stated that Outlot A is no longer created, and this stipulation could be deleted. Mr. Harstad stated that in reference to Stipulation No. 1(D), pertaining to the number of trees to be preserved, he felt the size � of the trees should be clarified and the area should be defined. Ms. Dacy stated that the original intent of that stipulation was to set limits of the grading, as it affected the edge of the wetland. She felt that the stipulation could be amended to say "the grading plan shall be amended to indicate the trees to be preserved in consultation with the City's planning staff." Mr. :iarstad questioned the letter of credit covered in Stipulation No. 1(G) and Stipulation No. 7 and asked if two letters of credit needed to be provided. Ms. Dacy stated that only one letter of credit was needed. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt Resolution No. 66-1994, with the stipulations attached as Exhibit A, as follows: (1) the petitioner shall enter into and record against the property a development agreement with the City. The development agreement shall include and the petitioner shall comply with the following FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15. 1994 PAGE 12 stipulations: (A) a stop sign shall be piaced at the intersection of the private drive with Fillmore Street; (B) the grading/ drainage/erosion control.plan shall consider the storm water from the Western Ridge�Estates development to the south. Revised drainage calculations addressing the entire drainage area, in- cluding the units adjacent to Polk Street and Hillwind Road shall be submitted. The calculations shall be signed and stamped by a. Registered Engineer; (C) the petitioner shall obtain a permit from the Rice �CZeek Watershed District prior to the issuance �of a building permit. The petitioner�shall comply with the requirements of the district permit; (D) the grading plan shall be amended to indicate the number of trees to be preserved; (E) the landscape plan shall be revised to provide fifteen six-foot evergreen trees. Underground irrigation shall be provided along the R-1 property (5512 Fillmore Street).� Ten six-foot Black Hills Spruce trees shall be planted along the nQrth lot line; (G) the petitioner shall submit a letter of credit in the amount of three percent of the construction value, not to exceed $60,000, to cover the outdoor improvements; (H) the utility lines shall be designed according to the City of Fridley standards and requirements. The City sY�all inspect.the construction of the utilities. A plan and profile drawing of the sanitary sewer shall be submitted; {I) Based on the review of the s.ubmitted grading, drainage, and utility plans dated June 23, 1994, the following information shall be submitted: (1) a rocked entry point will need to be installed for access and egress during construction. Provide a detail of such on the plan; (2) clearly show the water and sewer services for. the buildings. adjacent to Hillwind Road and Polk Street. Clearly note`size and location of existing mains; (3) modify the 15-inch RCP pond inlet so it directs the flow of water toward the pond outlet. Install rip-rap at the end of the 15-inch RCP; (4) provide two 'complete sets of calculations and drawings; (5) install concrete cross gutters and aprons at all driveway and street entrances; (6) clearly note the location of all public easements on a11 drawings. (2) the petitioner shall record a condominium declaration in compliance with State Statute 515A. The declaration shall include and the petitioner shall comply with the following stipulations: (A) the association shall be responsible for the plowing, maintenance, and repair of the private roads and d•riveways. The declaration shall permit emer-gency vehicle access;.(B) the drive- way shall be signed "no parking" on both sides; (C) the association shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance and repair of�the storm water; (D) the association shall authorize that the Public Works Department flush the hydrants in accordance with City policies; (E) the association shall be responsible for the main- tenance and/or repair of landscaping: (F) the condominium declara- tion shall include the layout of the project as submitted on the site plan dated June 23, 1994. The declaration shall comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statute Chapter 515A. (3) the condo- minium declaration shall require the association to repair and maintain the private utilities; (4) the petitioner shall execute and record access, maintenance and repair easements against the FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AIIGUST 15 1994 PAGE 13 development parcel and 5512 Fillmore Street to allow the resident at 5512 Fillmore Street to use the access drive; (5) the petitioner shall draft for City Attorney review and execute and record a hold harmless agreement indemnifying the City from liability for the private improvements as a result of work on the public sewer line; (6) the petitioner shall construct a cul-de-sac at the end of Polk Street; (7) the petitioner shall submit a letter of �redit in the amount of three percent of the construction value, not to exceed $60,00, to cover the outdoor improvements; {8)�the condom�nium declaration shall include the layout of the project�a� submitted on the site plan dated June 23, 1994. The declaration shall comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statute Chapter 515A; and (9) the grading and drainage plan shall be amended to conform with the recommendations stated in Scott Erickson's memorandums dated May 13 and June 8, 1994; (10) Outlot A shall be included in the subdivision with Outlot A conta.ining no more.than six residential units. Access to the residential units shall be directed onto Hillwind Road. Seconded by Councilman Billings. ��, MOTION by Councilman Schneider to amend Stipulation No. l(D) to read as follows: "The grading plan shall be amended to indicate the trees to be preserved in consultation with the City's planning staff." Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, MOTION by Councilman Billings to eliminate Stipulation Nos. 7 and 10. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Billings to amend Stipulation No. 6:to read. as follows: (6) the petitioner shall provide an easement for the right-of-way for the cul-de-sac at the end of Polk Street. Prior to requesting a building permit for the duplex at the end of Polk Street, the petitioner shall petition the City for construction of said cul-de-sac and assess costs to benefitting properties. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Billings to amend Stipulation No. 2 by adding subsection (G) to read as follows: (G) the petitioner shall pro- vide an easement for the right-of-way for the cul-de-sac at the end of Polk Street. Prior to requesting a building permit for the duplex at the end of Polk Street, the petitioner shall petition the City for construction of said cul-de-sac and assess costs to.bene- fitting properties. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to add an additional Stipulation No. 9 to read as follows: (9) plat approval is subject to final approval by Anoka County of the detailed mylars. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. � . _ . .. . : . i FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF.AIIGIIST 15, 1994 PAGE 14 Councilwoman Jorgenson was concerned about the dirt from the trucks on the residential streets fl.owing into Moore Lake. She felt that this issue�should be addressed. . Ms. Dacy stated that this could be included in the developer's agreement that the roads are to be kept clean. . Nir. Flora stated that this could also be handled.with the building • . . permit without any problem. • , : . UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 8. RECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 24 1994• A. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #94-02, BY FORREST HARSTAD OF TWIN CITY. TOWNHOMES TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 30 FEET IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION. OF TOWNHOMES GENERALLY LOCATED AT 971.HILLWIND:ROAD N.E.: Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that this variance pertains to the eight-unit building in Mr. Harstad's development.. She stated that the request is to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 30 feet. She.stated because the proposed condo- minium design includes patios with privacy walls.adjacent to the � front entries, the setback for the patios will also be reduced from the required 25 feet to 18.9 feet. She stated that because. the patio is not enclosed, site lines should not be affected. She stated that the petitioner is.also proposing a 36 foot wide drive- way. The R-3 regulations limit the width of a driveway to 32 feet, so a variance is needed. Ms. Dacy stated that the Appeals Commission recommended approval of all three variances subject to approval of the rezoning, vaca- tion, and plat request. She submitted photographs of the proposed townhomes showing the front entry areas. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant Variance Request, VAR #94-02, by Forrest Harstad of Twin City Townhomes to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 30 feet; to reduce the setback for the front patios from 25 feet to 18.9 feet; and to increase the width. of the driveways from 32 feet to 36 feet. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upan a voice vote, all vot.ing aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Harstad stated that he wished to thank Council for their. approval of his development and for the excellent help he received from the City staff who worked with him on this development. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 1994 PAGE 15 9. RECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 10, 1994• A. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST, SP #94-08, BY WARREN PAULSON,_ TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF A MOTEL IN THE R-3, GENERAL MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6881 HIGHWAY 65 N.E.: . Mr. Hickok, Plann,ing Coordinato.r, stated that t�is is a request .for a special use permit for the Budget Host Motel on Highway 65 in order to allow expansion of this business. He stated that this motel was built in 1960 and rebuilt after the tornado in 1965. He stated that in 1968 Council approved the construction of a redwood fence, rather than landscaping, to separate this motel from the residential area to the east. He stated that there was also a variance for a sign and a deck and vestibule. � Mr. Hickok stated that the special use permit would allow expansion of this motel with the construction of a 36 foot by 48 foot two- story addition and to provide for an additional nine units, making a total of 23 units. He stated that the addition would be located on the north side of the building. Mr. Hickok stated that the Planning Commission and staff are re- commending approval of this special use permit subject to riine stipulations, which he outlined. He stated that there is a mix of mature and ornamental trees on the property but to replace the oaks that are removed would be difficult. He stated that the petitioner has suggested that he would plant some evergrsens and flowering crabs. He stated that after visiting the site, he felt this was a suitable alternate to replacing the oak trees. .. - Councilman Billings stated that ther�e was some concern about semi- trucks on the site. He asked if they require a,larger parking stall. Mr. Paulson, the petitioner, stated that he has upgraded the pro- perty considerably since he took over this operation five years . . ._ ago. He stated that they are now affiliated with a national franchise, and they have not seen as many trucks as in the past. He stated that the trucks do not take much more space than an ordinary car. - MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation. of the Planning Commission and grant Special Use Permit, SP #94-08, with the following stipulations: (1) a stop sign shall be installed by the developer at the point where the parking lot drive enters onto 68th Avenue. The sign would be the cost and responsibility of the motel; (2) the addition shall be built with an architectural character consistent with the character of the existing motel com- plex; (3) no windows shall be placed on the second story of the east side of the building addition; (4) the parking lot shall be FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 1994 PAGE 16 re-striped to identify the 35 parking spaces indicated by the peti- tioner's s.ite plan; (5) the new parking surface shall include curb and gutter around the expanded parking perimeter. The curb�and gutter is to be concrete and of a staff-approved design. This curb shall extend into the public right=of-way to the point where the driveway radius meets 68th Avenue. The point of termination shall be reviewed and agreed upon by City Engineering�staff;�.(6) erosiori control fencing shall be installed during construction to assure no construction-related soil is carried into Rice Creek or adjacent landscape; (7) rip-rap erosion control shall be in-stalled at the base of the roof drain and at the point where the parking lot swale empties surface water onto the landscaped portion of the site; (8) all landscape areas shall be restored; and (9) the three 20 inch oak trees removed by construction shall be replaced by three 2-1/2 inch oaks in an alternate location on the site. Seconded by Councilman Billings. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to amend Stipulation No. 9 as follows: (9) the petitioner shall work with staff to identify appropriate plantings to replace the three 20 inch oak trees that were removed by construction. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 10. RECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 12, 1994• A. VARIANCE RE4UEST, VAR #94-13, BY WARREN PAULSON TO REDUCE THE . FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 10 FEET, TO REDUCE THE SIDE CORNER SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 30.33 FEET; TO REDUCE THE REAR YARD SETBACK FROM 40 FEET TO 19.44 FEET; AND TO REDUCE THE PARKING SETBACK FROM 20 FEET TO 18 FEET, ALL TO�ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF A MOTEL, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 6881 HIGHWAY 65 ' N.E. Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that the variance for the front yard setback is a pre-existing condition and not the result of the proposed addition to the building. He stated that the vari- ance to reduce the rear yard setback is to correct an existing encroachment and is for the distance from the north lot line near Rice C'reek. He stated that the other two variances to reduce the side corner setback and the parking setback are related to the new construction. Mr. Hickok stated that the Appeals Commission recommended approval of these faur variances. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to concur with the recommendation of the Appeals Commission and grant Variance Request, VAR #94-13. FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 1994 PAGE 17 Seconded by .Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 11. EXTENSION OF A VARIANCE RE4UEST, VAR #93-36 BY UNITED STORES, TO REDUCE THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 35 FEET TO 0 FEET, AND TO REDUCE THE HARD SURFACE SETBACK FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF- WAY FROM 20 FEET TO.10 FEET, ALL�TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF . P,N ADDITION, GENERALLY�'LOCATED AT 785 53RD AVENUE N.E�.: ' •Ms� Dacy, Community Developinerit Director, stated-triat 'this is a request to extend a variance for three years. She stated that apparently there is a zestrictive covenant that prevents the expansion of the United Stores building. Ms. Dacy also stated that Target is unwilling to work with United Stores to remove the restrictive covenants which will expire in 1997. MOTION by Councilman Billings to extend Variance Request, VAR #93-36, for United Stores until December 31, 1997 with the four stipulations as originally approved on February 7, 1994 as follows: (1) the petitioner shall submit a landscaping plan with the buil- ding permit application showing existing�landscaping and additional parking lot screening along the westerly lot line. Parking lot screening may be achieved through a three foot berm•or a hedge or a combination of the two. The landscaping plan shall alsa indicate three new trees to be planted along the westerly lot line; (2) the petitioner shall provide a grading and drainage plan and hydrologic calculations for review and approval by the Engineering Department with the building permit application; (3) the p�titioner shall submit an erosion control plan with the building permit applica- tions; and (4) the addition shall be architecturally compatible with the existing building. Further, the following stipulation shall be added: (5) all storage trailers shall be removed at the completion of this addition. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 12. RESOLUTION NO. 67-1994 RENAMING 59-1L2 WAY N.E. TO ISLAND PARK DRIVE N.E.- • Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that property owners on 59-1/2 Way are requesting that this street be renamed to Isiand Park Drive. She stated that the apartment owners feel the current name suggests this street is an alley, that the new street name is more appealing, and it provides recognition with the Islands of Peace Park. She stated that the apartment owners also felt�changing the name will assist them in their efforts to rent their apartments. MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to adopt Resolution No. 67-1994. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15. 1994 PAGE 18 13. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SEPTEMBER 6, 1994 ON STREET � IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - MAIN STREET PROJECT NO. ST 1994-8• MOTION by Councilwoman�Bolkcom to set the public hearing on Street Improvement Project No. ST. 1994-8 for September 6, 1994. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously, .. .... ... . _ ...•. . .. ..._ .. ..:........ ... . -.. . .... ._....�.. . .. ,. ... ... .. . .-... .. . 14. APPROVE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH ANOKA�COUNTY FOR THE UP- GRADE OF STORM SEWER ALONG COUNTY STATE HIGHWAY NO 35 (OLD CENTRAL AVENUE): Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that this joint powers agreement is for reimbursement from Anoka County for their portion of the storm water improvement project along Central Avenue. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the appropriate City officials to execute this joint powers agreement with Anoka County for the upgrade of the storm sewer along County State Aid Highway No. 35 (Old Central Avenue). Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 15. RESOLUTIODi NO. 68-1994 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE OSBORNE ROAD SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION, PROJECT NO. 249: Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that this improvement will relieve some of the burden of the lift station by installation of a sewer main connection from the existing main in East River Road directly to the Metropolitan Waste Control trunk sewer to the east. He stated that this would relieve some of the burden on the lift station and provide for an alternate source of discharge should a power outage or blockage of the main line occur. MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to adopt Resolution No. 68-1994. Seconded by Councilman.Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 16. RESOLUTION NO. 69-1994 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE WASHINGTON STREET WATERMAIN REPAIR PROJECT NO. 272- Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that there is a 500 foot section of water line on Washington Street where there have been several water breaks. He stated that with this improvement, the watermain will be replaced and encased in a polyethylene film in order to protect it from corrosive soils. MOTION by Councilman Billings to adopt Resolution No. 69-1994. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. �— `r ; FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 1994 PAGE 19 17. .INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS: • �• Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there were no informal status reports. 18. CLAIMS- . . _ • � � '� � �'� M�TTON' �by� ��ounci�Tman � Billirigs��to atithorize payiii2nt"'o"f �Cl'aim� Nos'.�'� '�'"'� � � ' ' � 57056 through 57307. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a� � voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried ; unanimously. 19. LICENSES• MOTION by Councilman Billings to approve the licenses as submitted and as on file in the License Clerk's Office. Seconded by Council- woman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 20. ESTIMATES• MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the estimates as submitted: Innovative Irrigation 10006 University Avenue N.W. Coon Rapids, MN 55448 1994 Corridor Maintenance Project No. 266 FINAL ESTIMATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,865.15 Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd. 400 Northtown Financial Plaza 200 Coon Rapids Boulevard Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Statement for Services Rendered as City Attorney for the Month of July, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5, 987 . 71 Schmidt Curb Company 21504 Ahlstrom Avenue Rogers, MN 55374 1994 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb Gutter & Sidewalk Project No. 262 Estimate No. 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9, 337. 55 FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 1994 PAGE 20 Lunda Construction Co. 620 Gebhardt Road Black River Falls, WI 54615 Locke Lake Dam Restoration Project No. 211 Estimate No. 3. ... . . . . . . . . . . . $49,358.67 .... .. .. .. .... .. �- .. � .. ..... ... .., ..._ .. .. ... .......... , , . ... . . . - . .. .. W.B. Miller, Inc. � 6701 Norris Lake Road N.W. Elk River, MN 55330 Street Reconstruction - Stinson Boulevard Project No. ST. 1993-7 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34,278.47 Bituminous Consulting & Contracting Co., 2456 Main Street N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55434 Concrete Street Repair - Kerry Lane Project No. ST. 1994-12 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $32, 633. 45 Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, al1 voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT• MOTION by Councilman Billings to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council of August 15, 1994 adjourned at 10:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carole Haddad Secretary to the City Council William J. Nee Mayor � _ � . DATE: TO: FROMt SUBJECT: Introduction Community Development Department PLarnvirrG D�SION City of Fridley September 1, 1994 ��. William Burns, City Manager � Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Steven Barg, Planning Assistant Request for Amendment to Fridley City Code 213 (Fences) Bruce Ackland, Vice-President of Certified Auto Recovery located at 3737 East River Road, recently submitted the attached letter requesting that the City amend Fridley City Code Chapter 213 to permit fences charged with electrical current. This property is located in an M-2 (Heavy Industrial) zoning district. Background Presently, Chapter 213.03 (copy attached) clearly prohibits construction of any fence "which is charged or connected with an electrical current in such a manner as to transmit said current to persons, animals, or things which might come in contact with same". Chapter 213 provides no variance procedure for the provisions of this code section. Earlier this year, staff became aware that the Salvage Center had constructed an electric fence within its perimeter screening fence. Christine Wilson, manager of this facility, informed staff that the fence is charged with 7,000 volts of electrical current, but she added that this is not sufficient to harm people or animals. Ms. Wilson stated that the fence's primary purpose is to serve as an alarm system and that intrusions are detected by security staff. Research Staff contacted seven neighboring suburbs and determined that four of these communities (Blaine, Brooklyn Park, Coon Rapids, and New Brighton) prohibit fences charged with electrical current, while three others (Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, and Mounds View) do not have any ordinance language which specifically addresses this issue. Certified Auto Recovery Request September I, 1994 Page 2 Recommendation Staff strongly recommends against adopting an ordinance amendment permitting fences charged with an electrical current for the following reasons: 1. The use of fencing charged with an electrical current poses a potential threat to the health and safety of the City's residents. Even if the amount of current is insufficient to cause substantial harm in most situations, there are special cases (such as small children, persons with heart problems, etc.) in which greater injury is possible. 2. Staff has not received any similar requests for an ordinance amendment permitting electrical fencing, nor is staff aware of other property owners using or considering such fencing. SB:sb CEM-94-79 � � AUG 0 4 �g94 C,A, R, CERTIFIED AUTO RECOVEfN August 2, 1994 William Burns City Manager City Of Fridley 6431 University Ave, NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Sir: We would like to request to the council for modification of your City Code 213.03 prohibiting electrically charged fences. We would also like for you to delay enforcement action until this request can be heard. Thank you for your help and consideration. Sincerely, � -'�� Bruce R. Ackland Vice President BRA/7J � ��— C/vv 1B 3737 East River Road • Minneapolis, MN 55421 • 1-612-781-7401 • WATS 800-842-2675 • FAX (612) 781-4515 213. FII�1�5 (Ref. 180) 213.01. DEFINITDON As used herein the term "fence" means and includes a structure or partition erected for the purpose o� enclosing a pieoe of land or to divide a piece of land into distinct portions. The term "fence" includes an enclosure about a field or any other place, and especially an enclosing structure of wood, iron or 'other material intended to preves�t intrusion fron without or straying from within. (Ref . 180 ) 213.02. PRIVA'LE NULSANCE ArYy fence maliciously erected or maintained for the purpose of annvying the owners or occupants of adjoining property shall be deeaed a private nuisance. Any such owner or occupant injured, either in his or her comfort or in the enjoyment of his or her estate by such fence, may have an action of tort for the damage sustained hereby and may have such nuisance abated. 213.03. P�i�IT�ON It shall be �mlawful for any person to construct and maintain or allow to be oonstructed or maintained upon any property located within the limits of the City of Fridley ariy barbed wire fence, or any fence of inetal construction or otherwise, which is charged or connected with an electrical current in such a n�anner as to transnit said current to persons, animals or things which might come in contact with same. 213.04. 7AT LII�iES Whenever a fence is or shall be located upon any preqnises abutting public property, whether the same be a street, alley, public way or othenaise, the City may require the aar�er of the property upon which a fence now exists or is to be located to establish lot lines upon said property through the placing of permanent stakes located by a lioensed surveyor and otherwise approved by the Council. In any case, no survey is necessary and a permit for the same when required may be issued on certificate or affidavit of the applicant that he or she is the owner of the pra�ises upon which such fence lies or is to be located. 213 . 0 5. IACATIO[d All fences must be located entirely �n the private property of the person, firm or corporation constructing the sar�e or causing the fence to be so constructed and erected, except that adjoining property owners may agree in writing that said f ence shall be located on the division line of their said properties. � 213.05. DEFINITION I:; i\i f:�� i i��' �:� � I r�i . ... �• .� �� ►��. LOC'ATION 213-1 213.06. SUBSTANI'IAI. �I�S'�iUCTION AI�ID ABAZ�NP �ery fence, whensoever and howsoever constructed, shall be oonstructed in a substantial manner anc� of a substantial material, reasonably suitable for the purpose for which the fence is proposed to be used. E�ery fence shall be maintained in a condition of reasonable re�air and shall not by reason of age, decay, accident or otheLwise be allaaed to become and renain in a state of disrepair so as to be or tend to be a nuisance to the injury of the public or ariy abutting property. Any fence which is dangerous by reason of its v�nstruction or state of disrepair or is otherwise injurious to public safety, health or welfare is a nuisance; and any such fence which has beoome or tends to be a nuisance shall upon order of a oanpetent oourt be repaired or removed as necessary to abate the nuisance caused or tending to be caused thereby. 213.07. Pf�NALTII'S Any violation of this C�apter is a misdeaeanor and is subject to all penalties provided for such violations under the provisions of thapter 901 of this Code. 11J 213.07 . •� r•. • • �. • • a i� PII�1�ILTIFS 213-2 _ _ C��TY OF FRIDLEY FRIDLEY MUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UN(VERSITY AVE. N.E. FR[DLEY, MN ii�32 • �61?) 571- �-i50 • FAX (61?► S71-I?87 August 19, 1994 Mr. Bruce Ackland, Vice President Certified Auto Recovery 3737 East River Road N.E. Fridley, MN 55421 Re: Property at 3737 East River Road N.E. Dear Mr. Ackland: This letter is to confirm the information which we discussed in our recent telephone conversation. At that time, I stated I would reschedule consideration of your request for amendment to Fridley City Code Chapter 213 (Fences) to the September 6, 1994 City Council meeting. Please plan on attending this meeting which will be held beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Fridley Municipal Center. Please feel free to contact me at 572-3595 if you have questions or wish to discuss this further. Sincerely, Steven Barg Planning Assistant SB:ch CE-94-422 1E LOCATION MAP � � � .��.. E� E'i� V� � �� !� ,� � ��1� .�/f ��i/ii,:•.�i si �'r�: x� O/i'9.��'.y/�/ �D . �� • � � � �� ' �� ,• 1 R � n ` �' ,�' ' i�%� .�%riif"��J�:'�;� ��^� ; , � ;�� . � � ' ;o■��;d%�;v ° ' ; . ;o�a;s�%v;■� v .��-�%■�,v �m� ; - , s�►� E�!/:��E�'.� �i. ;O�m;�1■■��Ei �►� . :0/��0s�i �.� . .� ' ;0i �m�,�� ;;0%@I ;� .,� i! ; ?��i��r-J��: ,,.i�a �" � %0%r@t;@�ri0:�1 ;0 " ,� 1 �p��i�' �� ' �<J! ;� � : ,.� �, �� ;7�r�' �3�t�� ts� :� �. , �._ „ .�;�J��l�<<�r�i.��i��t�i��riiii,i - - - �� %i///////�//i/.'Y/JJ�/f%JJO� ///ri%/��//////. '� ~-. � w..-y�i'� j3G.l,�6`�� . � : � �� :• � • i��i�'sm��:,0 � 7 :��s �%�'� E�i1.� . i0�� / �'s0 E'-�a�ifi � I ' _ : %,o j�;e�%��;v v ; •o%m�,am/�;o■ v ' � � . :..� :��►�%�::�,/'��i;�a - �s<< � - � ;,■c�<,i�,��•;��;v � � . - ;��',.�;Il��i�0;0 : 0 ,, u' %�i :E�;�'\% %�;� � :�r��%�V!�0%� 0 ' ',,Q�D;�r'�;� " � � s0r� ��•l1�1��%� � .A %��3l�:��3f;�%�� - ; � :��/ /�'a'�i��/��:J,�� •' � /�rs�a ��;�n�� a��/c�� r�s�, � �. � i / � � � i��%�Q� � r r ;°v%.!t�a;�%ms�sa; � _ . :�� :��a�;1 �i � �.�_ %r�� :OI��;L�� E� � ; :: �. .v�J>�'Q►.��Qr'. ��/ ` •�� , � �� / ir !� s�►��% E� i '�► y�E ' � ��@��1% A , , �. $�s � �� ` �1� �f �:a ��f �y'�� ' �`1 �R!i%1 �..r ,, '.i�!��:�!�!� t�- - - - - - -�flil■�=�►'i-+�►l�J . .. � s . . • � , _ I �pp •�i� �A i �iA�.; ' x, R '��c�+l .. ' �.�. . ��t. � .4 ; � � �� ti��. �, � , .. � x_ . . .�..;_ . �� 4 f�,'4� t� "�+K . s � :� . � � ," � � . F ' . • . �.:.. � tt ' f 4Y ir . , ::.��eK : �, u� � '_" s ^ } . x' .t��q4 "�"�� , " _�� .,� � ..,..�- . ;f7c;s , � '� . t �± �,, , i '� i ; � � � ! ��.� , �;�- � :� ..� %��i�` �% �FR • ?� 1 . � :�} !f ! � �; � ! �s ;� s ,R r a ' y, U � � f; � �Y � ,.�; � �'� �.;+� �a �: � '�t�� . .:� L�,':�i J �.. � - �� . �; ' �f t � t � � I ' � � {` � y �y�- � � � P ` E� F '� � � �:: , ;, s � �; �:. � , �; .� .� �� . � } �� '1 t, ' �{ � ,� � �� $ _t =� ^ Y , � ! ). � � � ,f� . ,�+ .,�.F` . ..`j � . y�f' . �l . y - G � � , t .5 �: y [� a i �� k� `',� , � ; �� , s�, , S.� � � , - i „a 1� �.i •: t l � � i .. t{j . . .,' ..4 11 L j 1-` � ��S i. 11 i� 1i '.' ' �`i � y� ..� �� i.' � `, t �t� {{�e' t{' i gi . . ., : . � 1, ,� c •�S" � , t `5 ' ` � i �, }'� . i 5� i;� � � +� i. 1; � -1,x `. 4 � �tl: ''; i�g 19 t � ��:�, . F ! 4 �, ,�o �,��i�, � � '`�:�, ��, t1' !' ?�'� � ; � � � -1. � �� . ; � ! � 't�� : ��; �� 1 p' ; � � t : i 1 �' �, + � ,�� . �� ti� s�� s i�� '� ��' �l tit �� n . ;} a�' ��si� 1 � � � ��f � . '. ;+ . v, - ..��A � �� f �? 4 t .�� s. . , ; � 1 i l,� '�k � �i �! a t � . � � � �' . �} -?t � i 1 `'. � 3 t.�. 1 3�.� t� ! � ,�.;I ' %;t y f , �� s� � � -� �.�.� . �� . . i q" � � , i.� L; t� � , w x,; ,, � �, � . . � . � aa . . .. � . � � �'. a � � '�i' �s ' . .s 1: � � t`% � �+�-. `� -S iF: �i � 4�b� �� . .1 � • � � 1.�, , , } ;� �., � >- `� i •' � �i � ;,i. � , =� .:,o� s x ��:: '� . �:�, .:. �_ � r ,��, � � � �� k��a�- i s � �.�^ . . � �` � - � � . s � �'. � . � t ,F x . t �,��i � f � �. � � � ° t -,: i •n ��a�. . ��, � . � i � � �� , i \ � A � {� . `� , ,'. 1,i ` :g{, � , �,i .3 -'�'�� 1', ..�e . . e .. i � •�:a�,r i . �� } � '. � � 'i 1`, , , � a ` S�.` �t � , �� t '� � � 3 t, 7 � � � � d , e' �' .� �� : � ,�� yr � , :...� � . � . ta#�• �. ' `��. � :� t � '��.. -�� .1 , S ,� � . k '.� �. ; ,, � Engineenng Sewer waler P�rks $trc;els MainSBnenc�. ME MORANDUM TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�f � �r FROM: John G. Flora,�Public Works Director DATE: August 19, 1994 SUBJECT: Main Street improvement Project PW94283 + s The Anoka County Highway Department initiated a project (CP 89-28-102) to reconstruct Main Street (CR 102) from 44th Avenue N.E. to the I-694 overpass. Based upon the Co�nty's cQSt �� participatian formula and the storm water improvements associated with the Main Street surface water problem, the improvement cost to the City amounts to $242,704.26. The City has been following a policy of assessing concrete curb and gutter at a fixed rate. From 1992 to the present, the figure has been $8.00 per front foot. In 1973, by resolution the Council established a policy of assessing storm water improvements at a�gure of $800 per residential lot, or a maximum of $8.00 per 100 square feet for other types of property. On a number of,projects, the City has also assessed bikeway/walkway/sidewalk improvements to the abutting properties. This area had some minor storm water assessments in 1957, 1960 and 1966. Those assessments essentially provided for the storm water system in the residential neighborhood between University Avenue and Main Street. It also provided for a storm pipe from I-694 down along the railroad right-of-way. Based upon our analysis of the history, it appears that the properties were assessed a maximum of $3.05 per square foot for all the storm water improvements in 1966. Some properties were only assessed in 1957 at $0.32 per 100 square feet, and some in 1960 for onfy $1.04 per 100 square feet. Our records indicate that there are some properties that have never been assessed. Consistent with the past policy, it is proposed to assess the storm water, concrete curb and gutter, and bikepath improvements. In reviewing the surface water drainage in the area, ttie storm system currently being installed is to pick up the surface water runoff that enters Main Street from the industrial properties to the west. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to only assess a portion of those properties. As a means of establishing an area, we have defined that only 75 percent of the properties drain to the street as a reasonable area in which the surface waters are collected on Main Street. � 2 €� Main Street Improvement August 22, 1994 Page 2 The concrete curb and gutter project would be assessed to the thirteen industrial properties on the west side of the street and 32 residential properties that front on the east side of Main Street. The bikeway would be assessed to the �2 industria! properties that abut the pathway. Based upon the above figures, it is proposed that the City contribute approximately $20,000 to the overall project. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the preliminary assessments amounting to $222,850.60 for the City's portion of the Main Street improvement project between 44th Avenue and I-694. JGF:rsc 2A � �r7 � 8 !�d� � BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD � Marketing & Property Services 4105 Lexington Avenue North Suite 200 Arden Hills, MN 55126 Tel . 612-490-6160 Fa x 612-490-6167 August 4, 1994 Mr. William J. Nee Mayor Ms. Ann Bolkcom _ Councilmember, Ward III City of Fridley Fridley Municipal Center 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Mayor Nee and Councilmember Bolkcom: For your review attached is copy of my August 3 letter to Mr. Clyde V. Moravetz of the City of Fridley concerning the proposed pathway along Main Street. That letter and yours of August 2 addressed to Mr. Richard A. Kraus of this office crossed in the mail. My August 3 correspondence provides the current status of the pathway as it affects railroad land. � As you shall note we are pursuing the request for the 10 ft. wide strip as requested by Mr. Moravetz ( segment located between the A.P.I. Supply Company property to a point southerly of 49th Avenue NE). The requested 15 ft. wide strip, lying southerly therefrom down to 47th Avenue NE, is a part of the land under contract for sale to Murphy Warehouse Company. Due to that contractual commitrr�ent, we no longer can consider granting an easement over it. That segment will now require Murphy's approval. Since we expect to close that sale earty next week, it is suggested that you work directly with them for those easement requirements. Si // � r•uce E. pp Manager, Property S � � BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD Marketing & Property Services 4105 Lexington Avenue North Suite 200 Arden Hills, MN 55126 Tel. 612-490-6160 Fax 612-490-6167 August 3, 1994 Mr. Clyde V. Moravetz Engineering/Cable Television Administrator �iY;� �f Ri idl�y Civic Center 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Re: Pathway Easement Request Dear Mr. Moravetz: I am in receipt of the pathway easement along Main Street N.E. in Fridley. The document was brought to this office on Monday. As it relates to the 10 ft. wide strip, I shall review a proposed grant with our Ft. Worth office. Assuming they are agreeable to a donation, I will forward a letter agreement for signature by the City to cover general terms that the railroad will want included in the easement document. Concerning the request for the 15 ft. wide strip, we have a contract covering the sale of that property to Murphy Warehouse Company. i am anticipating that the land transaction will be completed during the week of August 8. Due to the advanced stage of that sale proposal, the railroad is unable to work witla the City on that� particular parcel. If you require use of that land for pathway purposes, you shall need to contact Murphy Warehouse and determine if they may be willin� to provide a grant. Sincerely, Bruce E. Opp Manager, Property Services 0 s� � � o�� y � c � o� �'o • pr M C.C. Mr. John C. Holman 5400 Main Street Minneapolis, MN 55421 Dear Mr. Holman, • �`� �� / JUL 2 7 �� I live on the 5400 block on Main Street across from All-Temp. I've lived here for six years now. I'm aware of the proposal for construction of Main Street, there's no dought we need a new street (with runoff } . �--�'� I also like the vines on the fence and the trees, it would be a shame to take them down.And would rather see the bike path alang the curb, but! I don't understand your worries about your property scenery and not your neighbors such as I, truckers are parking their rigs on Main Street and let them idle all night, early mornings and everything in our homes rattle and drives us crazy. But even worse are all your truckers idle their rigs and the diesel fumes and smoke rolls across the street into our homes, you can't even open windows at times, let alone try to get a,,breath of air. Yes, its that bad, and I'm sure Mr. Holman your aware of it. I've talked to Ms. Bolkcom and others. I find it hard to support you when all you seem to worry about is scenic views and not the people across the street that are being harmed. Mr. Holman, you should learn to take care of some real problems that exist first! Sincerely, Concerned Citizens ALwp,YS oN roP CENTRAL ROOFIN6 COMPANY �!J�' � � �� ` ^ nA`1� �'`�v 1 pU� � ? 1994 �s,2> s�2-osso — SINCE 1929 — Fax �s�2� s�2-o2so 4550 MAIN ST. N.E., MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421 August 15, 1994 Wiiliam J. Nee, Mayor Ann Bolkcom, Councilmember, Ward 111 City of Fridley Fridley Municipa! Center 6431 University Avenue NE Fridley, Mn. 55432 Reference: i�roposed i�iain Sireei 8ikewav Dear Mayor Nee and Councilmember 8olkcom, Roofing and Sheet Metal Work • Waterproofing Thank you for your recent letter on the proposed bikeway along Main Street. In previous discussions with Clyde Moravetz, I outlined my co�cerns with the bikeway. Once we reach agreement, I will be happy to support the bikeway. Mr. Moravetz has indicated the City would underwrite any costs associated with our undergrou�d sprinkler system. When the representative from Anoka County came in to speak with me, he tofd me that their contractor would be building the bikepath. He also said that any expenses relating to the sprinkler system would be left to us. This is not acceptable. I am concerned with liability issues should someone using the path get hurt on our property for any reason. In all likelihood our sprinkler system will be used to water the lawn on b:oth sides of the bikeway. This could cause someone to slip and fall or be sprayed while on the path. Our corporate sign is composed of concrete block. It will be lo�ated within five feet o� so of the bikeway. I am worried that someone using the bikeway may run into it and injure themselves. I want the City to indemn�fy us for any and all claims that may arise in the future trom someone being injured while o� our property. If the City can do this and assume the expense of any sprinkler relocating, 1 wilt wefcome the bikeway. ,, Sincerely, CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY ��.�;;�� j1'� . ��.�ei►� Anthony M. Spigare{li President -- �—� �� — 1 — � 4 h1 C� ha l- = = — — ' � F' - �_� � , -r aurnorl:ea . �eY �4T�;uu�n�r August 1, 1994 Fridley City Cauncil RE: Bike Path alor�g Main Street Dear Council Members: We have been asked to grant a.right of way #or the proposed �ike path along the west side of Main Street. I have a concern that the proposed bike pat#� may actua!!y create a worse safety �ondition than exists today. f would ask #hat befor� any decision is made, the city should salicit the apinions of iraffic safety experts t�� determine; (1} whefher a s�parate bike pat� is actually safer fi�an a designated area on #I�e east side of Main Street; (2} whether it is wise to draw neighborhood traffic across Main Street to access the bikepath; ;3) what safiety problems ate created by placing a bike path along businesses that generate extreme truck and passenger car traffic. rt seems that if safiety :s in fact the primary concern, there wauld be more diligence in ir�suring the current bi#;s (anes were clearly marked. Perhaps if the City designated adequaie furding to maintain the stripes, the resu(# �votrld be a safer situation at far fess expense. If fhe purpose is to provid� a more p)easant biicing experience than Main Street provides, consfruct the path dlong the BUrlington No�hern tracks on the west side of our praperties. I t�vould readily support this �Iternative, Sincerely, �� O.�vid W. Goodwin PresidEnt 57 30 M�irl �itr'CC2 Nor-Ihe3�t • Minneapoiis. Minnesot�� 554L 1• F 1;�-C„� � nnn . c�. �_- ,- ,., --..-, , . � `, , August 8, 1994 City of Fridley Civic Center Mr. Clyde V. Moravetz 6431 University Avenue Northeast Fridley, Minnesota 55432 Dear Mr. Moravetz: �. � �� Safetran systems Safetran Systems Co�poration Electro-Mechanicai Division 4650 Main Street N.E. Minneapolis, MN. 55421 TEL. (612) 572-1400 In reference to our meeting of last Thursday, August 4, 1994. There are points that remain in our discussion, which I will cover in this letter. On advise from aur attorney's, the access to our driveway by the bicycle path would be unacceptable, as would any cutting of our mature trees on the easement granted by Safetran Systems Corporation in 1985. Because the proposed bike way will be cutting across the beautifully landscaped grounds of our corporate headquarters, we would appreciate the city to grant Safetran Systems Corporation some latitude in the surfacing of the proposed bike path, that it not detract from the beauty of the surroundings and is in keeping with our corporate image. I a�n enclosing a proposed route to be takeri by the bike path for your comments. Sincerely, M.L. Keefe, Executive Vice President MLK/eb cc: William Burns - City Manager William J. Nee - Mayor . . ',,. ' � �__I 7� : :1 I � I II � � I I tr'4'� f I i � � T � I � i i V ��i�= � i � i , i � � � o ! � I � ` i �� a �i � , c-� � � �' -�� -- � _ � � r � - L�� I � � I �T Cf� � � W � y 4:i� r-- ---�1 � � 'NR I � � � 1 I +� o� � I o� -�- f J. v �� I � � „ I � � UI + � N �D � I �N� --i O� — — — -- V t _ '�! � r. G�.` , _—'_— J'�__ I I� -—- N�� n � �j N , I .._l �v " I. i J �i � � _ _ � �:. � � _� Z 7i i � i - -- �� i � I �_ �#� � i , , �I j J i I '7 L � I I l�__' � I Ol � � --- �-- - :4- � �� i � f�r' � I ( '� � I I � ti � �_ i ' �— � I �,, , { ',. �� _ ` , �n i --�� i� �_ I x o; � � � .-! - =-!- ,��- r � �i � f� � � � W �� I � � �, �� , ;,_ � , � � � � � � \ s `� � � 1 � � � V , V N � c � . �. '� � �� a �� g w � S � � � �n �� 2 O v +� �� 1 , 4i �� 0 Y �� h ,.:� . � � � , ---- � � ' �- �\_ i / � caur.+tr:..-� o V �' �; r T F,e�a� \�N; 4� ` I .M I -- i; . I I � _..r.� I 1 cv I � . I � �. N I �; � _ r� x _ � �"�� \ � �_ �# \ — �.J 9 � � � � `� � � � � �, � Z � �' ��) � � � � ��/�\ Ui �� \' \ � � G\= � � �� . .r , - . .-p�6zy�� ■ Supply Company � 5110 Main Street NE P.O. Box 648 Minneapolis, MN 55440 (612) 571-5100 • FAX (612) 571-5186 August 26, 1994 Ann Bolkcom City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 Dear Ann: The purpose of this letter is to formally state our opposition to the location of the proposed bike bath along the west side of Main Street between 44th Avenue and Interstate 694. We think that a safety/traffic study should be performed before proceeding with the bike pat� construction. We feel that the city is imposina an unnecessary safety hazard on the businesses along the west side of Main street. From Interstate 694 to 49th Avenue, tllere are 14 driveways/business entrances that generate very high volumes of car and truck traffic on a daily basis. This does not include the traffic which will be generated by the Murphy warehouse now under constrt�ction. Our location alone generates between one hundred and two hundred ins and outs a day with personal and truck traffic. By proceeding with the proposed bike path on the west side of the street, you will be exposing people using the path to unnecessary safety issues and you will be exposing the businesses to unnecessary insurance/safety issues. WP think ±hat it ��,o,.i� be in thP best interes±s of tl�e Cir,� �` Fridle•,� a;,�? the affe�i�� Fri�ley businesses to take a closer look at the safety issues invol��ed. Sincerely, %�, - __ �� %� / �-__ _ Bryan L. Kuha Conti-oller cc: David Goodwin, Dealers Manufacturin� John Flora, City of Fridley Ce�lar Raplds - f.�rgo - L.+� iosse - M//waukee - M/nnewpolLs - Newton -/'ruii.� - Rap/� City - Sloux City � 51oux i.+//s ¢ W H 2 U Z � J Y O O ¢ m O BR00%LYN CEN7ER MINNEAPOLIS .4 �` I ;; ,, � r U i � I J r' v �^�-, _ ��r_ '_7 L �t1 .. ;] -- /��,i�\ M�'+OJDUAJ• r �,/� s��c w ��.._. _ �n� \ � i p%-'� � � � �. % '� ;' � / E. A.R � ' f� ��/�� / BUS. � CFNT. �u J� �' I ;�. � �� '; ` � :: �� .��, �. � ° ° E.R.F. f/ �i C �. i,� I� eu5. ; : ;� ' � I 1 I � � � 1 � 1 I i � � � � I 1 i � � I �� I �� I { � � I � I � � � � �. i j� , . � j I i .ii.. i.� 3 � � ;� � .,.� ,; , � ,:, ,�i , , „�, ..,.�. I: . i%�_' a_ y--� .n � 1� �1�—._� � — n �700 i ,� .. ..� �� fl((� y — .ui iif , . . _,r aius ' I \\ • � 3300 \ � 1 � i ' .. y��=,�� ' � �'�.; c ' � ; ALL TEMP ! i ` � : ' �_-� �:� 1 ; � _. ,, , ,� � � .�� '� - �;� Ii . 1 - S!0 �f��. .5�_�_ � ; �� ) � , � - T �f ,�.o -� `� '° � ` KUR S � �, � ��1�! CEtlT. .� � ; i ` I� I� � � TIMMERMAN `�""` o ;o�:;� � I ' I � � �i 1 f- � H B FULLER z ' �q�, � a � GLADWIN � i �i � � � I � 7 ��_1_=.J� , - � � DEAL �� ; , ERS Mfg ' �t �r, � � � � -s,o., � �:: �:; , i � . � , � � 6 �-' �� ' ; API Supply � , � �..,a I , i�. i, , _ I . ..,o.... I1 � ' 1 '._. _� ��...t.. .o i `' � ' ; � BN RR' ..�a. ..�.�. - . i . ..`.,_ I ' � I f., L^ n .1 �` ; �� I ;i0 7 ��\ 1 . ♦900 � � I . C �'�, ;. - � r. wcwa Q , �� \ � 1 1 ^ � ?i �" ;'3 �\ II I � `' 0� �� ' II � I � s;fti � .�� u\ - — — ------1, � � , � �^ �I� � � i f � _ - :',�- ,�f�:�;�;-± �, �;:�r�� ,. ' " • � �,�.\� � r - i � \ a�uu � v \ .✓� `: � � �\ i I ...- -- �T7j I ..e� � ��• ,1��,.�\ � I ( ` � ' � �,�`ff' „ �.�, � �t��;7r�3-.;��1 � I � ;��::'' C\ \ I ' - N��;,�� .f____ -,nnrnr�- N � �� —"_ t� � �� `\ C�3`J�R�;L �?�+�JF 1 � L a:.+ \ \ �� r---.....v � Lr � �� 4 �,\\ � � � � ;-E `,\� GENERAL MILLS ,�;� � `�',1 , , � ,,�f,�"' I��c1 � , ' �� "� I.C' G., I i , ^�� n �'� J ,'f � ' /, �+�^ � Wl � ;I . ( \� ' `', �. o�/ .- n , � � � ��J �� r - � � � �) ..,� . �\� 1 \ ! �� ,,�� i \_ _ — I � N 1�- _ ,. ..� Q m � J ..,. ..� au �er Qn : I I. nn r�� Main Street Addresses � �v� Pioi ) �o� 8/4/94 � • � • � • - • • • • 5 • • • � • • 5 • • • • • • • • • • • • 54�0 • � • • • • • • • • • • • • � • � � • • • • iC • � • • i • • • � • • • • • • � • o • • • Z • 52 � 2 • 1� � •,s,i�, ... � 113� • • � � • • • • � • • • • • 5i�� tc • • . • • • • • • • • • ic �a9� � • • • �� • • • • • • • • • � • • • � • • • • • � • • • 4�60• ► � • • • • � • • • • • • • • . . .... .... ... . . . . • aeso • • • • � � • • • • � • • • • � • � • 4�50• • • • � • •4��• � � • � • � • • • � � • • � � • i � • • • � • f • � • � • � � • • • . . . . . . • • • a.. ��so� • • ♦ a�l o 95 7S 1 0 1�5 1 9 8 56 �� i12 100 0 �� i �a� t69 t57 i45 333 69 6S 6! 57 15g 8S o, �� 39 27 �15 �03 �91 �53 i43 �33 i23 i1� )1 �� P. /%� (-__- - _ -- �— --- i � -- I� � �-- - i� ii ' ' i � .- - - -. � � „ � i - --- - ' � Main Street Addresses I �v� ,io� + ,na B/4/94 � � � � i 0 ��r __ � � , ,� ; __- , �� ,�___ ,; � __ _ . �� Main Street Addresses I an o �a plol j 101 8/�l94 5400 95 75 i 0 �5 101 0 � 5280 00 269 5250 51 T0 30 08 96 5130 a2 60 48 36 24 12 00 5110 100 l 2 101 4900 � 101 8i 69 57 45 33 4760 � 4650 4550 asoo � 25 4380 69 65 6? 57 15g 85 o, �� 63 �1 39 27 15 03 91 73 53 a3 33 23 l3 �� P'�'i � � �� n ��i _�_ ;� 'i __ � ! � 1 �_---- � I ` I � � . i - —_ � r _ � . DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Community Development Department PLa�rrG D�SION City of Fridley September 1, 1994 William Burns, City Manager �� A� Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant Special Use Permit Requests for Gordon Hedlund, SP #94-03, SP #94-04, and SP #94-05; Riverview Heights The City Council tabled the above special use permit requests at its July 25, 1994 meeting to resolve the stipulation regarding the height of the structures. Mr. Hedlund recently passed away, and staff has been workinq with his nephew, Mitch Moe, to resolve the remaining stipulation regarding the building height. Mr. Moe has agreed to a height restriction as measured from the street elevation as opposed to the elevation adjacent to the structure. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the special use permit requests as proposed with the attached stipulations, and with the added stipulations for each request. l. The height of the dwelling shall not exceed 30 feet as measured from the street elevation of 818.25 feet for SP #g4-03 (Buffalo Street). 2. 3. MM/dn The height of the structure shall measured from the street elevation SP #94-04 (Cheryl Streetj. The height of the structure shall measured from the street elevation SP #94-05 (Dover Street. M-94-512 not exceed 30 feet as which is 817.25 feet for not exceed 30 feet as which is 818.54 feet for � I■ N T � - 3A � � � �,s� �� , � � SP 4�94-03, -04, and -OS Gordon Hedlund 1 � .: �: . . ;#� ? � 1 v' �°r : � �w�� 2 2d l�• � :-- 1—� 1 ta�L o . �OCATI�N MAP Stipulations for Special IIse Permit, SP #94-03 Lots 12 and 13, Hlock Y, Riverview Heiqhts Generally located on the south side of Buffalo Street East of Riverview Terrace Gordon Hedlund l. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate in addition to a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevation is 824. 2. The petitioner shall flood-proof the garage in accordance with current federal and state flood-proofing requirements to a minimum of the 100 year flood elevation. 3. The fill placed on the property shall extend a minimum of 15 feet from the proposed dwelling unit. 4. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the engineering plan dated May 23, 1994. 5. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the plan dated May 23, 1994. 6. Rip-rap shall be placed at the end of the swale adjacent to Buffalo Street. 7. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines. 8. The petitioner shall submit retaining wall plans that have been signed by a structural engineer. The retaining wall shall be constructed of concrete or stone. 9. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability if damage occurs as a result of flooding. 10. The petitioner shall grant a 10 foot flood control, street, utility, and drainage easement along the west lot line. 11. The grading and drainage plan shall indicate the number of trees to be preserved. 12. The petitioner shall sign a Combination Form, combining the property into one tax staternent prior to building permit issuance. , �' `, '� „'� `-� SP 4694- T -1 �, e� � Gordon . Y� �7 L [�_1. 1 L__�L�l L_ X � .j ^ � �� `�" : ..�.. � O. �M1 N = J � .n � �� 'd,V �:l � � � � r � O ' O �1 � ', j � � -G c}. /�\ t �� Yr � � ,� � • .�� t+� �1� cT � _ F 6 `j � � t� �re mN� � � ao �' K � � . ` ,i ` � % .h.—... .�n _ � / � x = 1"�"��_ \ , x , b r x . , � \ � `_� � J � ` �' /� j x r� , �, - - ( I"I'� � d ' _ �'� , o _ `._- _ - � .� . - � � , � /� � 1 r� ` \ , . ` � � . ' / �C Q �, � �� r �' " � l / . i �,� o --- --- - - - - , � /� 4. i o, i � �J ' � � i e, � � ,l� � � � Q � .� � � , � ,,/� ' 6� t� � d t� �-1� '4 I �'' ,v�' ��s� ��' �CPO I O '� O �" �� I � � �- o , ,� , - ��, `� , � �, � e , , � , ' � � 7 ,�` � � � � � � � � �, � � �, o � � � I � ' � ,ry �" ' � 3 . '� i � � � I� � ' o ,. � � '' z I� - _ .� I -.-� -� � �_ ,- �� - _ _ _ _, _ -0 � � _ � ---�, �' . � " "_� � 6i � 6'�� F� r ' .� � � ----_� -, -- ----- - -_ _- .'y-, �� . _ :� / c�1 � °% - ' " - � `�� •� i ' ^ �>� '> .t+ � r ' i O � � � � � � �� ` T ` \ � ' � � � � cY � � 6;, � �,� � � � l - - " �'.. �' � � � (/ _ � � _ ' . � �fM / � i. � � j �� V / , `� , 'i� in `� J � '' �� ^ L,• � \ �0 � / �i' ` < . / � `c ��%~i��' Q� � �� \ j\ N � � � �� `/ \ v � ��. , � � J \�i- � - �\� �. � K �� `�f�,�_ ., I— A c /') �� t' ;� � /� ' 3C j � P -; rr � ��G J 1 � �t, � 3 �lund �r '-' <<. � �� i 8tipulations for Special IIse Permit, SP �94-04 Lots 29, 30, and 31, Block B, Riverview Heiqhts Generally located on the south side of Cheryl Street West ot Broad Avenue Gordon Hedlund l. The petitioner shall sub�it an elevation certificate in addition to a verifying survey prior to the foundation being capped, which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevation is 823.9. 2. The petitioner shall flood-proof the garage in accordance with current federal and state flood-proofing requirements to a minimum of the 100 year flood elevation. 3. The fill placed on the property shall extend a minimum of 15 feet from the proposed dwelling unit. 4. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the engineering plan dated May 23, 1994. 5. The verifying survey shall confirm that the grading complies with the plan dated May 23, 1994. The retaining wall indicated on the plan shall be constructed of concrete or stone. 6. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the west, south, and east lot lines. 7. The hold harmless agreement shall be amended to require the property owner to maintain the stormwater catch basin and pipe. 8. The petitioner shall execute and record against the property a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liability - if damage occurs as a result of flooding. 9. The grading and drainage plan shall indicate the number of trees to be preserved. 10. The petitioner shall sign a Combination Form, combining the property into one tax statement prior to building permit issuance. 11. The dwelling shall be constructed in the location proposed on the grading plan. 3D - tac ti� hs� F l.00p z t� c-L .y 2� :.Pt"�P'o`�CzO C�O+�IiDu�. r�l�. �ow�-,T FtD�R = 02.'�.� �l.tvG�.ra�.� SP4�� 81 . I C2�.o��1��t'�o5t.'� `7�T l��V� x .�-�j � �2A\ c�l P� l�,"� SP ��94-04 � � � �� Gordon Hedlund � �oPoSG� -� � zS � C �--� �. � � l_.._ � � � �=�` `�" " � � I , � �� _ � — �, �,, �, � ,, — � i �►.� �`�' „y+; ��' c.._ < �cP; '� � v � ,,� � � .✓ , � ` \ ' �y o�, � � t �(� � �' — 7C— -• - _ ..--- '{ i� : . - �J �i.�� b I .F ^ `� �1'� ��,��. d�'T�•jP��wAY � � � ; i� � V .d• • t �6 s . 'ry`°�. , � R `'cw �'' i - -- 4y � �1 �,,.--C � -r \ — - "�b cr+0 a::tr� r � \�' �� 0.3' GLfcAR �4� ' � Q ( 3 , a V ,, - � a►, ,, d fi� �,, , ,� IJ ' � �'` ' t9. 1► � � � � ^ � l � \� ^ `�x \bx ' ` ~ � - i !d So r'` � , I Z'Z' � � l , ! � , �� . , - - -, , ---.�-�-' � r� I yv.e /�a-e q � t � I ' � � � " � I l �i�� I Z41 �` 1-10 � �. ��' � � � � ti i � ., z y � f' i ✓ / j�'`J (�^�� O � " X� ` � a � . � � � � 8, . I 1 .� P/�.p � ,� . T � ` � �r' ��f/ -� � �'I � � j� �.a.�.-�z � ( " f '� o+ � � I 9. �,� i y � � � O � � �7�7 i ��0 � ' � , � � 8F FJ� u�2�O � n - - - ' �4. O - - � � I 1 p \ � I 3 ( � \ � � � ti Z.� � t 1 ^/ 1 4� �� ` 2L � � ( 1 `{ k-- �' � ,� � � � rG►+C.L ��yCR�� ' ZO �, � + o.�s' ov�R i,HC ;� , l C��`i,, 1 ,�., �l l �s.�J ' � '. c-LEAR � \�� p,tocicAfL _ � • I .0° . ,,•� A i� • \b 7c� p 616.t � _�t6-x -� i� QO QQ `� `�TPr IN),P4�t Y•�/�. tr ' J / e �,' w ao D P� Q.c. F� Hi.� LHa,inl �NK � �'GN�►E ce �/ �\ ToP y� A�L: B l$ �,. 2S BEEHIVE 1 SI� � C�� •O —_0. �t, ORATE ��'�� l F�� \W Z� �� R.E. Ald.! �`1 � �„�A� Gts��; �E. �8'3. � 3E . Engineer Pian D• 2. 3� �� r' s �::�-(' L�.L-► AL D GJ � o M L,r.� . � L°1,'�o i, �� \ � ��I.OGC X F (`_ :'v �� R`� � L w Stipulations for Special Use Permit, SP �9s-05 Lots 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block V, Riverview Heiqhts Generally located on the north side Dover Street West of Broad Avenue Gordon Hedlund 1. The petitioner shall submit an elevation certificate as of a verifying survey prior to the foundation being cap which shall verify that the minimum first floor elevati 824.1. 2. The petitioner shall flood-proof the garage in accordance with current federal and state flood-proofing requirement to a minimum of the 100 year flood elevation. 3. The fill placed on the property shall extend a minimum of� feet from the proposed dwelling unit. 4. The builder shall grade the property to conform with the engineering plan dated May 23, 1994. 5. rt , is 15 The verifying survey shall confirm that the gradinq compl�es with the plan dated May 23, 1994. 6. Erosion control measures shall be installed along the wes�, south, and east lot lines. 7. The petitioner shall execute and record against the prope ty a hold harmless agreement releasing the City from liabili y if damage occurs as a result of flooding. 8. The grading and drainage plan shall indicate the number o trees to be preserved. 9. The petitioner shall sign a Combination Form, combining property into one tax statement prior to building permit issuance. 3F • �G�DON KGTJw�p— FtEREBY CENTIfT 1MAT THIS SURYEY. ►LAN OR NEP08T i�5 PRE►AAED BT 4Y Ofl UNDER YY 018ECT SURVERVIS1oN �; ��r A SkTeRE01�;ER SOT� SuB�EYOa Ut�EN diNNESO A REGISTRATION NO.zpz�o huRTH Su�2vE'fIN�. ►NC, � - IKUh Munuw�n� ,uoz �EFFEItSON st. n.� �p94-05 BEARINGS AR£ ON AN CULl.Mh1A ►,��c;+rrs. ►w. s � q��ED DA�UM lo�:l 7tl0-97oG fwx t612! 7t�YOTib��n Hedlu �� o, : 6 7C►7 � 1 N y'aPo"� 41.C�% . PRo�o�� _ =_ �,�.o,��, �-��.,� G��,1`�� C�� ' RC�Q.O VtSTANG�: Lr.� � r'�CAS �LGD •• Pri:nc.r+MAZ1��• ToP NvT Hyp�.PuNT ta7 w�a �; aov�c� Av�., �--- �aa-- =GX��T�rth c,oKTO�vZ � ��cv.- �2+-1.�9 cNt�,�,�.-wz,�� z� =e�4!'ascr�c,o.►J�v2.. loo `I � A� F �-�o _�L3 .\ ___� - b�1 Pl f�� M�N • �.Ow��T F�oo2 = 'a2.�-l•1 �Q.4� = PROPOS�D spBT (��VE�►-E SPA�-�� x EL�Vi4TlDI� � x ' � �5� s �, �ti�• , . t 0�%i .� 1 DO �� ; ..._ -- � � , � C''^� _' -� Q ;;a i ?,�+'',.-� , i.1 � .� � DZu,� �8L° . ��, i � J �— i'�pJND o{ F+r"� � x _g��',""� 1.0°�o x 1. Q% x �\ / 'y/ J j 1 � � i r" � `�'a = � � � ' `�✓ ' � ` �; � x Z.Z z �- �a pd �u _, gti f'�'/' - Stu ` � oti �.�Z � � �� .� ud �' ��o �� ;.eh4 7 $ ,� � �d z...� �` � � �� ti ' � � � o Q � r � - � �� o � � � � _ � � 1 � �� ; L, �- / � !�2�'� �.� / a� / , a � , $ti , G � �� 819.7 1 ;ai9,s� `, `�� _ F�ryo" �� i� - - - Y\a�/- - ' I /= J' � f � ��► c.x•�z'1,� � � � � ` �O X �� I � i K I �=- I (� P � i c.�AR. Si.AB'a22.� � / � � � � � -' 2 x �o' . � •ti I ► � � i �, � �, — — — i — � o � � o I � � o , � � ,,� 3 � i i � � 20 � I i 90 � `�°Y� x 819. x _�__ �__._....�.-- / 819.7 1 /��4� � _''c. T --,�. $ \q \ �'_ `_ ' � _\ .St4 - -c ,a3 � 01T. LJ�PJ �1� �� 1�1L%i -r—y-� , `�, " `— — � q , '� � �'''' > -- � �. Engineer Plan 3G `. , � � �� ' '''' c� �� '� t� ` � �" � �-,�=—� `� � � �= ' ° � l . �Z � a W oL O W N s � � c7 W z � Z G �t ,� tl� / �' c � .� �i a N � � � � � � � � a � e � arrn . � W � � � � � � � Q � Z Q. � a,��= �LLW�1 �� a �� 0 �w 7� �� °` ��iz � �gQ �/� V �I � � � �-,L.I � v � Q W — �I Z � �— � i�.l C(� �� Q � > s 4 � W � � � z x --- w Z t= �u cWit �-- �, S W � � �; � Z a� � � $ � � � Q� � � ` � LL � l: Z Z z a a � a � c � a r m c � � a � � 0 N „ . r i�i J h FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETZNG OF JULY 25, 1994 PAGE 2 Ms. Griep stated that persons who wish to participate an contact Julie Swanson at 572-3634. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: COUNCIL MEETING, JULY 11, 1994: MoTION by Councilman Schneider to approve t e minutes as presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. MOTION by Councilman Schneider to am d the minutes by inserting the following language, after paragr h five on Page 10: "Council- man Schneider stated that under t existing code, they would be allowed two four-foot directional�signs." Further, to correct the Roll Call Vote an Page 14 to ind' ate that Councilwoman Bolkcom and Councilman Billings both vote against the motion and the motion carried by a 3 to 2 vote. econded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all vot' g aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKE ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimousZy. ADOPTION OF AGENDA: Mayor Nee reques d an item be added: (2) Set November 14, 1994 as a Special City ouncil Meeting to receive the canvass from the election. MOTION by C ncilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the above addition. econded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voti aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. The e was no response b iness. OLD BUSINESS: from the audience under this item of 1. RECEIVE ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 1 1994 (TABLED JULY 11, 1994): Mayor Nee removed these three items from the table. A. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST, SP #94-03, BY GORDON HEDLUND, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION IN THE CRP-2 (FLOOD FRINGE), GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BUFFALO STREET EAST OF RIVERVIEW TERRACE- 31 � � BROAD AVENUE• BROAD AVENUE• 0 Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, stated that t ese requests for specia� use permits were tabled at the last Cou cil meeting to allow the petitioner time to analyze the impact f a height restriction on these properties. She stated that the petitioner has not submitted any additional building plans but has reiterated his feelings from the last Council meeting that he el� the height stipulation was too restrictive. Ms. Dacy stated that staff has reviewed house plans which have een constructed in other parts of the flood plain area. She st ted that if the 30 foot height is measured from the existing st eet elevation, a split level and two-story home would not meet the height requirements; however, a one story rambler could be constructed to conform with the maximum height. Ms. Dacy stated that staff reviewed the definition of build'ng height and measured the elevation at the front of the buildi g. She stated that this is at 822 feet, and any house plans could be constructed within the 30 foot height limit. She stated that st ff is recommending a stipulation that the maximum height be measu ed from the 822 foot elevation on all three lots. Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, submitted some typical build ng plans showing a rambler, a split entry, and a two-story which co ld be constructed within the 30 foot haight requirement if ineasu ed from 822 feet. Fie stated that a non-traditional two-story may be 31 feet high. Ms. Dacy stated that Mr. Hedlund, the petitioner, contacted er this morning to say that he was in the hospital and received a c py of the staff report. She stated that he indicated he had no objection to the proposed stipulatian that the maximum height be measured from the 822 foot elevation. She stated that Mr. Hedl nd advised her that if the Council rewords this stipulation, he wo ld like the action tabled until he can attend the meeting. Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that if the height is measured from e street elevation, Mr. Hedlund could not build a majority of the e homes. Ms. Dacy stated that is correct, as two of the three designs wo be over the 30 foot height limit. She stated that Mr. Hedlund 3J } FRIDLEY CITY COUNCII, MEETING OF JULY 25, 1994 PAGE 4 advised her that if the elevation is measured from the street, he would object. MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table Special Use Permit Request, SP #94-03. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table Special Use Permit Request, SP #94-04. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a vvice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table Special Use Permit Request, SP #94-05. Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. 2. A. RECEIVE AN ITEM FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 29, 1994 (TABLED JULY 11,1994): ° 1350 GARDENA AVENUE N.E.: Mayor Nee removed this item from the table Ms. Dacy, Community Development July 11 Council meeting a number reviewed staff's response to these regard to the question on the plat #86-06, Valley Oaks, there was assessments. She stated that a this plat in 1987, but there as Council on the plat. Di of n -ec or, stated that at the estions were raised. She stions. She stated that in �mitted by Charles Cook, P.S. issue with the storm water ic hearing was conducted on o final action taken by the Ms. Dacy stated that in r sponse to the question on the size of the Innsbruck Nature Cen er, it is 24 acres and was dedicated as a park in 1971. She s ted that the original land area for Pecks Woods was at least 64 acres extending from Rice Creek Road on the north to 49th Aven� and Highland Lake to the south, into New Brighton on the ea� , and approximately along the Matterhorn Drive alignment on the ,�iest. Ms. Dacy stat that in response to the question regarding Arthur Street, it w s constructed in 1972 and was part of Pecks Woods. She stated hat in conversations with Mayor Nee, the Council in 1964 info ally discussed acquisition of the wooded area north of I-694, b t the cost was prohibitive. She stated that a portion of Island of Peace park was acquired this same year. She stated that the dication of Innsbruck Nature Center in 1971 preserved 24 acr of the original Pecks Woods. 3K TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER 1C-�� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR PAUL S. HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT SUBJEGT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING A"PROPOSED" BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995 DATE: August 24, 1994 In conformance with Chapter 275, Section 065 of the Minnesota Statutes, attached i� the "proposed" 1995 Preliminary Draft Budget. Chapter 275 requires the Ciry to certify,a "proposed" budget to the County Auditor pri�r to September 15. We request the City Council pass the attached resolution and adopt the 1995 Budget. RDP/ph Attachment RESOLUTION NO. - 1994 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A"PROPOSED" BUDCET FOR THE FlSCA! YEAR 1995 WHEREAS, Chapter 7, Section 7.04 of the City Charter provides that the City Manager shall prepare an annual budget; and WHEREAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Statutes requires that the City shall adopt a proposed budgei before September 15; and WHEREAS, Chapter 275, Section 065 of Minnesota Statutes requires that such "proposed" budget be certified to the County Auditor, NOW THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOIVED that the following "proposed" budget be adopted and approved: GENERAL FUND 7axes and Special Assessments: Current Ad Valorem Delinquent, Penalties, Forfeited Special Assessments Licenses and Permits: Licenses Permits Intergovernmental: Federal State - Homestead and Agriculture Credit Aid Local Govemment Aid All Other Charges for Services Housing and Redevelopment Authority Water Fund Sewer Fund Storm Water Fund Liquor Fund Cable N Fund Construction Funds Fines and Forfeits Interest on Investments Miscellaneous Revenues Other Financing Sources: Employee Benefit Fund Closed Debt Service Fund Liquor Fund TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Fund Balance: General Fund Reserve TOTAL GENERAL FUND ESTIMATED REVENUE $3,489,601 75,104 2,444 148,452 277,486 4,562 1,067,981 1,584,149 452,061 261,064 179,607 128,951 93,580 29,838 67,359 20,445 32,063 221,867 515,000 85,454 50,000 266,526 75,000 s, � 2s,ssa 820,753 39.949.347 4A Legislative: City Council Planning Commissions Other Commissions City Management: General Management PerSOnnel Legal Finance: Elections Accounting Assessing MIS City Clerk/Records Police: Pol'�ce Civil Defense Fire Public Works: Municipal Center Technical Engineering Traffic Engineering Street Lighting Public Works Maintenance Recreation: Recreation Naturalist Community Devetopment: Building Inspection Planning Reserve: Emergency Nondepartmental APPROPRIATIONS $100,328 3,461 s,s» 309,895 97,592 220,000 0 517,454 142,280 159,355 104,709 3,152,714 9,634 788,638 187,319 493,882 202,700 645,541 1,187,576 582,885 255,213 181,455 317,422 �ss.000 97,677 59.949.347 SPECIAL RE�/ENUE FUNDS Cable N Fund Grant Management Fund Solid Waste Abatement Fund Fund Balance 70TAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Capital Improvement Fund Taxes — Currerrt Ad Valorem Interest on Investrnents Donations State Aid Construction Fund Balance TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS AGENCY FUND Six Cities Watershed Fund Taues — Current Ad Valorem TOTAL AGENCY FUND TOTAL $99,188 208,201 231,754 28,744 5567,887 $85,550 Generai Capital imp�oveme.nt 34t,204 Streets Capital Improveme�t 10,000 Parks Capital Improvement 650,000 22,746 51.109.500 $3,500 as.soo $11.630.234 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS SEPTEMBER, 1994 ATTEST: WILUAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK . � WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR $� 15,494 $1�,000 7 ,000 1 2,500 DA`Y OF TO: WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER �� FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR PAUL S HANSEN, STAFF ACCOUNTANT SUBJECT: RESOLUTION CERTIFYING "PROPOSED" TAX LEVY REQUI�REMENTS FOR 1995 TO THE COUNTY OF ANOKA FOR COLLECTION DATE: August 24, 1994 In conformance with Chapter 275, Section 065 of the Minnesota Statutes, attached �s a resolution certifying "proposed" tax levy requirements to the Anoka County Auditor. Chapter 275 requires the City to certify it's "proposed" tax levy requirements prio# to September 15. � The 1995 "proposed" ta�c levy of $3,667,686 represents a 0% increase over the 1994 We request the City Council pass the attached resolution to certify the "proposed" levy requirements. RDP/ph Attachment RESOLUTION NO. - 1994 A RESOLIITION CERTIFYING ��PROPOSED'� TA$ LEDY REQUIREMENTS FOR 1995 TO THE COIINTY OF ANORA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute Chapter 275, Section 065 requires the City to certify it's "proposed" tax levy requirements to the County Auditor; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Fridley certify to the County Auditor of the County of Anoka, State of Minnesota, the following "proposed" tax levy to be levied in 1994 for the year 1995. GENERAL FUND General Fund CAPITAL PROJECT FUND Capital Improvement Fund - Parks Division AGENCY FUND Six Cities Watershed Management Organization TOTAL ALL FUNDS $3,592,295 $ 72,689 S 2.702 $3.667,686 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1994. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 5A WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR � [, Community Development Departme t � PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 1, 1994 n_ �r TO: William Burns, City Manager ��r- FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Resolution Approving a Lot Split Request, L.S. #94-03, by Timothy Strong of Strong Built Homes 1476 and 1490 - 64th Avenue N.E. The Planning Commission reviewed the lot split request to crea two single family dwelling lots at its August l0, 1994 meeting The lot split request is generally located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Camelot Lane and Arthur Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request to the City Council with the following stipulations: l. The petitioner shall provide the information reguested in Items a- d prior to the issuance of a building permit. a. Clarify the amount of fill in the front yard by addi additional spot elevations and drainage arrows on th grading plan. b. Clarify how the shallow ditch section along Arthur Street will be handled. c. Provide accurate first floor elevations to insure proper grades for the sanitary sewer services. d. Provide an erosion control plan in compliance with Chapter 208. 2. Water and sewer services shall be provided to the dwell units. 3. The sanitary sewer connection shall be made via the manho e located at the intersection of Arthur and Camelot Streets Timothy Strong, L.S. #94-03 September 1, 1994 Page 2 4. The petitioner shall pay the appropriate connection fees and SAC charges ($800.00 per unit) at the time of building permit issuance. 5. The petitioner shall pay a park dedication fee of $750.00 per lot at the time of building permit issuance. 6. The petitioner shall provide a verifying survey prior to the capping of the .foundation. 7. Prior to City Council action, the petitioner and staff shall designate which trees shall be preserved and protected pursuant to the restrictive covenants. As a result of the field inspection, staff is preparing a map for City Council review and approval. That map shall be attached to stipulations as Exhibit A. The City recently completed the 64th Avenue stormwater improvement project. As part of the improvements, the benefitting properties were assessed $1,000 each. The Engineering Department has requested that these lots also be assessed. The following stipulation should be added: 8. Each lot shall be assessed $1,000 for the 64th Avenue stormwater project. The petitioner also applied for a variance, to reduce the front yard setback from 35 feet to 20 feet in order to align the new dwellings with the property to the north. The Appeals Commission at its August 23, 1994 meeting voted unanimously to approve the variance request as presented with one stipulation: 1) Lot split request, L.S. #94-03, shall be approved. Staff recommends that the City Council approve lot split request, L.S. #94-03, with the recommended stipulations. MM/dn M-94-494 . ` RESOLIITION NO. - 1994 RE30LIITION APPROVING A SIIBDIVISION, LOT SPLIT, L.B. �94-03, TO SPLIT TWO PROPERTIES INTO FOIIR SEPARATE PARCELS, GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1476 AND 1490 - 64TH AVENIIE N.E. WHEREAS, the City Council approved a lot split at the , 1994 meeting, and stipulations attached as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, such approval was to split two properties into four separate lots as follows: Parcel A• The west half of the north half of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Vall City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. Parcel B• The east half of the north half of Lot l, Block 2, Spring Vall�y, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. Parcel C• The southerly 75.00 feet of Lot 1, B1ock 2, Spring Valley, Ci of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. Parcel D• That part of the south half of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Valley, lying northerly of the southerly 75.00 feet thereof, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. These properties are generally located at 1476 and 1490 - 64th Avenue N.E. WHEREAS, the City has received the required Certificate of from the owner; and WHEREAS, such approval will create four separate parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council directs petitioner to record this lot split at Anoka County within six months of this approval or else such approval shall be null an void. . : �ey Page 2- Resolution No. - 1994 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1994. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK � 6V WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR Page 3- Resolution No. - 1994 EXHIBl]T A 1. The petitioner shall provide the information requested i Items a- d prior to the issuance of a building permit. a. Clarify the amount of fill in the front yard by ad additional spot elevations and drainage arrows on grading plan. b. Clarify how the shallow ditch section along Arthur Street will be handled. c. Provide accurate first floor elevations to insure proper grades for the sanitary sewer services. d. Provide an erosion control plan in compliance with Chapter 208. 2. Water and sewer services shall be provided to the dwelli units. 3. The sanitary sewer connection shall be made via the manho�e located at the intersection of Arthur and Camelot Streets. 4. The petitioner shall pay the appropriate connection fees SAC charges ($800.00 per unit) at the time of building permit issuance. 5. The petitioner shall pay a park dedication fee of $750.00 per lot at the time of building permit issuance. 6. The petitioner shall provide a verifying survey�prior to capping of the foundation. 7. Prior to City Council action, the petitioner and staff sh designate which trees shall be preserved and protected pursuant to the restrictive covenants. As a result of th field inspection, staff is preparing a map for City Counc review and approval. That map shall be attached to stipulations as Exhibit A. 8. Each lot shall be assessed $1,000 for the 64th Avenue stormwater project. . � e 1 S TAFF REPORT Community Development Department Appeals Commission Date Planning Commission Date � August 10, 1994 City Council Date : September 6, 1994 APPLICATION NIIMBER: L.S. #94-03 PETITIONER• Timothy Strong, Strong Built Homes, petitioner. Laura Marx and Shirley Nevala, owners. LOCATION• 1476 and 1490 64th Avenue, located in the southwest corner of the intersection of 64th Avenue and Arthur Street. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family Dwelling. The property is heavily wooded and an open ditch is located along the south property line. Part of a ditch section is also located along the east property line. REOUEST• To create two single family lots. The subject parcels are the west and east halves of 2, Spring Valley Addition. Spring Valley Addition 1941 as a 125' * 300' lot. It is unclear from the the lot was divided in half, however, there is are files indicating a split in 1959. p,rrALYSis • Subdivision Requirements Lot l, Block was platted in record when surveys in the The proposed lot split will use the south 150 feet of both the west and east halves of Lot 1. This 150 feet will be split into two single family lots measuring 75' * 125'. Parcel C will be 9,375 square feet, and Parcel D will be 9,423 square feet. Both lots meet the minimum lot area and lot width requirements of the R-1, Single Family District. The petitioner has submitted a proposed location for each dwelling. The dwellings are located 20 feet from the front lot line. The required setback is 35 feet. The petitioner was 6E Staff Report L.S. #94-03, Strong Built Homes Page 2 . informed that this would require a variance, and has submitted variance application to reduce the front yard setback. The proposed locations meet the remaining setbacks of the R-1 District. The lots created for the existing dwellings also meet the mini: lot area requirements. The setback requirements are also met. Wetlands Some of the vegetation on site is that which can grow in wet areas. In addition, the ditch along the south property line would be classified as a wetland and has been identified as on by the Rice Creek Watershed District. The Anoka Conservation District investigated the site and determined that no wetlands other than the ditch section were located on the property. Th petitioner should use appropriate erosion control measures as required by Chapter 208 of the City Code. Gradinct and Drainaqe The petitioner submitted a preliminary grading plan establishi the lowest floor elevation at 886 feet. The elevation of Arth Street is approximately 890 feet. The Engineering Department requested the following information regarding the request: 1. Clarify the amount of fill in the front yard by add additional spot elevations and drainage arrows on t grading plan. 2. Clarify how the shallow ditch section along Arthur Street will be handled. 3. Provide accurate first floor elevations to insure proper grades for the sanitary sewer services. 4. Provide an erosion control plan in compliance with Chapter 208. **Stipulation** The petitioner shall provide the informat requested in Items 1-4 above prior to the issuance of a building permit. Utilities Currently, the proposed lots are not serviced for water and sewer. The petitioner will need to connect the dwellings to municipal system and pay the appropriate lateral fees and the Sewer Availability Charges required by the Metropolitan Waste sF a �n Staff Report L.S. #94-03, Strong Built Homes Page 3 Control Commission. The petitioner will need to connect to the sanitary sewer system via the manhole located at the corner of Arthur and Camelot Streets. **Stipulation** **Stipulation** Water and sewer services shall be provided to the dwellinq units. The sanitary sewer connection shall be made via the manhole located at the intersection of Arthur and Camelot Streets. **stipulation** The petitioner shall pay the approp=iate connection fees and SAC charqes ($800.00 per unit) at the time of buildinq permit issuance. . Park Dedication The Subdivision ordinance requires the payment of park dedication fees for each lot split or plat. The current fee is $750.00 per lot. The fee is paid at the time bf building permit issuance. **Stipulation** The petitioner shall pay a park dedication fee of $750.00 per lot at the time of building permit issuance. Verifvina Surveys The Building Inspection department requires that a verifying survey be submitted prior to the eapping of the foundation. This ensures proper placement of the dwelling. **stipulation** The petitioner shall provide a verifyinq survey prior to the capping of the foundation. The subject parcel is heavily wooded with a variety of plant materials. Preserving much of the vegetation wou�d be an asset to the parcels as we11 as the neighborhood. A"no cut" easement should be recorded over the west 15 feet of the lots to maintain the vegetation and provide a buffer for the properties to the. west. In addition, as many trees over 4 inches in caliper should be saved by the petitioner. **Stipulation** The petitioner shall record over the westerly 15 feet of the lots a��no cut�� easement which would prevent clearing of the vegetation and provide a buffer for the parcels to the west. 6G Staff Report L.S. #94-03, Strong Built Homes Page 4 RECOMMENDATiON�STIPIILATIONS: The proposed lot split meets the requirements of the R-1 Distr�ct regulations. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ; recommend approval of the lot split request, L.S. #94-03 to the City Council with the following stipulations: 1. The petitioner shall provide the information requested in; Items a- d prior to the issuance of a building permit. a. Clarify the amount of fill in the front yard by addi�g additional spot elevations and drainage arrows on th� grading plan. b. Clarify how the shallow ditch section along Arthur Street will be handled. c. Provide accurate first floor elevations to insure proper grades for the sanitary sewer services. d. Provide an erosion control plan in compliance with Chapter 208. 2. Water and sewer services shall be provided to the dwellin� units. ! 3. The sanitary sewer connection shall be made via the manho�e located at the intersection of Arthur and�Camelot Streets.' 4. The petitioner shall pay the appropriate connection fees and SAC charges ($800.00 per unit) at the time of building permit issuance. 5. The petitioner shall pay a park dedication fee of $750.00' per lot at the time of building permit issuance. : 6. The petitioner shall provide a verifying survey prior to the capping of the foundation. 7. The petitioner shall record over the westerly 15 feet of t�e lots a"no cut" easement which would prevent clearing of tne vegetation and provide a buffer for the parcels to the west. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval'', of the request to the City Council with the following amended stipulation: 6H ' Staff Report � L.S. #94-03, Strong Built Homes Page 5 7. Prior to City Council action, the petitioner and staff shall designate which trees shall be preserved and protected pursuant to the restrictive covenants. As a result of the field inspection, staff is preparing a map for City Council review and approval. That map shall be attached to stipulations as Exhibit A. The City recently completed the 64th Avenue stormwater improvement project.� As part of the improvements, the benefitting properties were assessed $1,000 each. The Engineering Department has requested that these lots also be assessed. The following stipulation should be added: 8. Each lot shall be assessed $1,000 for the 64th Avenue stormwater project. CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning Commission action. 6� L.S. ��94-03 Strong Built Hom�s 4 i - � �J L _ ,,�o�� _ .. � � Si��#�P��' c—�; —_ ; � zo�sl /ss i1f /zt ��s �.rS �1s �zf �1s o� � �i� i/a�/ � �n � (�� l�l� �1�� % �f) ti i /�f� � � �Zf w (3� i o �r . ��` " �� : _�� SOy '^ � � � V .: . .. N.1 C � /, " � �� , .. � i 7 y � � �� j� q � � � �/5�� t ��?4 / oQsre v! Kbhc S�% � o � zo�e, cc.1 ! ^� `' �.��h)1� lc j3f. 63 ' �2J „ � � j . �� (�� ° : fi�,�,1 u �o ' � � e � %i0� .:YfC w , � � � , s G�) (i�) lr�) f1i) �, I r�l �''� e��'z� �� /9 �i3) � '� �' � �. ��'� � � .e�... v :. . _ .�-- . . �, �'� /� , ✓ y' � y ,to ...�� .� - --- , � (p� Ci% , ' +�� L1� ( � � :� I � %v `24 :��G� (IS) ,.� • �4) � � � � Y �� .3e n-- _� ��s i�s : , r � so" I s o� izs �•lh ��s' �� ..� . , : � . �4TH AVE. N � o . � y�- . V • ` ��1 s!o ii� " s /1S i1f iIS ioo fo �f i.: *�' ,/,' � ` �K� eb �4�� s t �� ' (�} � �(dY) �tI ��i°� �'�� C�►) (�°� � ; �` l�l� ; i . --- � — /3 - -��- - 9 7 '�� w�z EvZ � ` : � �49 � � - (sD) o � (t', I ' ^ i� � � l��l / � � , I �U x V�" /� .. CN) (+�) , w, ' a fr). ; _ � . � O �;�� _� �7 ` u.f ,k.6 r.ivi.s� :15 , w� '� RO. E RD ESNT � z ,^ � � — —t-- ,y 3 (*5'�` �-- /�,(51) (i6r) � �3?� C�� js) � � `k� � � � � '� � -j-` (3� • � �s� ^ ��Bq+� `� � � � � • , � o � 3�s� ' 8 /4 -�IZ'•, /tJ " r.� — �— ¢ o .'�' . � � - - - - - �.�� ; �y�l ? (s�� I.� �� ^e � ,�� U l�i� �, 'J ,... -- -- — -- y 33G./Z a ZS .13 /s.S '� iz !zs s< z� —� / _- — _ '�;,. �• � � . .. ,u�. 9 �� • � ll+s �s� �o �• w �o s . - � !�l / 87... � -- � liflf I `�l) � �1%� ,� . � % ' � �//'�l Cs) � I � �a ` � � � � r - ` �� ° `; ~ � I� I (r) rU I �' � _." �\,�{.s �:r,� .�.. ... . �`� � � I Z (a) i <vJ � . ,� � -.,� ' ,,, vrid %J.'!'%y./rs G ; ° '� � ( �` � � � �` ' �M /J� Z � 5A h) Ae/s.sonr�- ' v a �: - . :- � 7� 'S ,,, . . I � � ,,.� , s.s; �� 4 � (M) � .._. , . :. � ... . . . .. � � . -. , , : "_° _ Q� � �. �� 1.�� _ �.� ,�� _ .. s� LOCATION �VIAP ; L.S. �k94-03 StronQ Buil � �C° j'�'�'�'� I//�ft � � .!'r:�'.! _��!�►;r�' .... ►j/ 1.1.�.t.11 . :�. , I�I�t�1��11 � mp �� '°'i� .... �.4' f� ,!� - � ::::; .�,. �:::� � ,pp •.�,r_ ...�.�.,• .... ; .�..,•�Ir ,... ' �o .... ... . - ....�1�;i ;... .... � � �...� . ;E'i� ;�.� ` �e�N /�/� � iii� ' • � ��, � � � � ��' 1��\ -�� - � ��:::i1u1 , i�or �� . � � . � � � , �:�; � � � � ` I ` ' ' ��' '�.. 1 �� ,. . .E:::._, �� : • ,� _ ;--, �....,. . • r .. _..�. .. .1 _��R• � ` ��' �� , .... . :� �.� iiiii :i „ a�� ► /•� EiiT1" iiii�iwi � , S � - • ��.r��r .��N%CN�' ' � �� N��\ � .� CC::��::::: � �-� � - - - .. . '' _ A�:�:�±�i � rsria�� , ��r�♦ � � ♦�•>�� •� i � ��o_<;; �� •:•;.�.y�.»y- r ♦�♦ .► :�•. ♦ � i i - ��` � . �� ♦ ♦��r• •,.�-,c�.>. '' 0�� i�� • t * . -+ _. �►,��a- � � � � � � � � � � �/-�-r��-� :�� : G� �, �.�.�.�.�♦� '�,�.�,�.�'�.�, • i . �� " ' � �\� i �� '� 1 �:�� S� ��0 - '� -:r ys�:l• ' �� i��i� ,�:♦�♦ 1i . �!• :.!,❖. _ • p Q��/�'�� •,a..�� ►��:��` ��►�!�� '' ' ��`''� �:t�� !�l�� ►��•#. ••►�►��♦ A�0 � � "� _ . �_�,.•.••••��• � ��- - ► . .-.. � � , �. � � • ��'- � � ' ' ia�� T�r ��=' ��,��t•��♦ �� ..�• •• �►��• 0 Q, . ..��••♦�• /��.�t►�1�• ��♦ ' :: - �- � l�C�) �♦ y♦ r�►�� ♦�♦ � ' "��' �i' � 1��♦��N�� ♦ � '*-� �-f�� . � .. �14 `♦ ■ • ■ ■ � � � ■ ■ ■ � � � �u �, ••: ■ . • � � > 0 L . S . 4� 94-03 Strong Built °i F ' : « ��a .= �i�� g ��i; b �� = ��5 � og�� t •� "•,' � •. • ° � �; # °�� _ � o r �� ' _ ,, �=�a _ =_� � � �� u'° � � I � `C��`� � ~�a� � =e�� : W � W W�c ' + u ci . � � o W O , f � i. C�rW� '� ..�iM m � �� `��i Ht2i0N 3f1�N3A`0 Nib9 `� � b . .. . NJ � � � '• _ �._ ' � �� -� -- --1 9d �� j =:; •... •.,► ae aE � o~; , � . �� . �� • J�r . _ s _ � ��/1/ r . _ . T • j J O�r .�! - \ �{� � CH � J=� M1YON 311MiA� M1t0 0{►t ` s .i �'i�' i '� ~ � »a� �nn3nr �i+o at►� � ■ �� _�� g�� : 9Lt� L , 06f� I. �� ; � s�� a!� �� .�� . > , � , � � s � � syy .�`r �. �� 3 , s �e � ' S� A� J . c , � 1 �� f+� ; =l � �� ; 0- � ' � , � �� . ss� � � �3 � 11{ w W � ` r .'u ' '� a� � . a . �� ' ` � , . . �: a � � at. � ; �, I � F_ � � � z � o � N � � �:i � � z o w o >� � � l O � � � W � NN o n/ � —� >" : ` •_. .k p = .. W m�'" o � J N O C C� � � � a � — _ � 0 0 � � a°c � � � N g ' � Q r t�1 j LY � N � — � -= _ -,— - — - — - - i __ f./�;c .:n )/��v rY�'0-- -- — -- •—•wi.jr.' i� ! � .' — — —" -' i `�w:� . _ - - - '- — � � -- -- - - .. .-' - ' - � . '�---•I � w�� '�� i ; �: � ` .. � . _ 6L__,___ — ---- -- -- _- -- W W � H (!) � ;a � � � i= _ . >.. f- `�� °G ,o�= . Q iM�O °S�Pw �W4` g Wpz■Ws j � i � ~ � N�da~r M�Y � ! i = � ��il�Mm00 I �:WE , �� ` 1 gW°'�` � _ Y�°� 4.. �. N g I ""°:�°° j �KWW4_ � 0 ux:�.� Cat�1�'�.^�t ; � -'; � i ! m > � ' - .. . M1'� �� . ' « �3 'g� �� '�� 's :> �g s� � o�, �� `sW o��y� - ��t J` W v .�Y ��` �`� zF~ �L � 8t� ��V �� y��: ZJS� !!�� .� � � cst r� ~W J~� M� �� i� ;y� p. �� ss� o. . +` , . r a . � � � � z � � � N Z 0 � O � O' � Vl � J ?- C = W � �" N O O V � a p � F— a � � � g O � Q � W � � � � � < � � � .; W M J � > �� r o' (y �� . : _ '� W o� J � o a c.i a v% � a H1aoN n 8 L.S. ��94-03 �trong Built � �� 3t1N3nd Hlb9 `� — _ — _ _� b .�,. _ ..,,, _ � . _ .. �., _ • .\ . ` �� N1YON 3flM7AY M11• 0{►t �I ZY ` �- , 06t�L � ; � , , � � � � 's ' 's `c 1 ' = �. � M < �� •~ �� ^ M �� 1 W \ :` � �. � � . . Y H 1 �^ I v � �' W + _ = I ` � � , � 1- ' � \ ` I tn . � / v \ . �y- .- - - - = ao.r:� __ _ ... _ ="'- -- , ' .��'I tt � 1 .� - -- �-• -- - - - - - - ... — - :..... � � .Y„i i / .�+ �, � _ _ � .•,.-o �. :..,�,.,.. = _ T `r��;;t ;:, �r�� rc�o-- -- - -- --•�«•;� �� r _ - - _ _- _ _--�� - � ft_. _ - � l � i-- � va.`. � �4 -i u�z. i �: 6M s �� : � � a ^ �� ~s � A W wF`� � � �� .- . � � °��3 � � � °�>; � � � !� �3�: .,.,� � ` � � S yVj W � � � <s ~ ti O � � ��o� ,� ^s � '. W L W=�= ,: a °; :gWa ��. Q�ri�F\ �i �isv~i m T � r a t � ` s t � i� _ . , ._ f- ��„ � .ois . a�WW ZM�C °a<:, < W M bg' W:W° a��'�~ ..�_� � N W ~ f i N � i x u "�WWpO � F M � � _ W � ' :"'SS�� gW ` Y_W" W� g` , po��oo i Y % W W 0 � � °:=�zS oK�� Came� ^�t ; ..� . t � � ANOKA CONSERVAT/ON D/STR/CT Raintree Professional Center 11931 HighwBy 65 NE Blaine, MN 55434 612/757-4221 Fax/757-4771 Tim.ithy Strong 10884 Avocet St NW Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Re: Wetland Consultation For Property Located South of 64th Ave West Side Of Mr. Strong, August 3, 199� Arthur. ' I wallced the entire site on 8/3/94. A 3' soil probe was used for soil samples. The only areas that meet the wetland criteria set within the 1989 Federal Manual For ldentifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Weflands are within the ditch that runs east-west on the southern portion of the site. All areas north of this ditch do not meet any hydric soil criteria or wetland hydrology criteria. If all fill material is kept on top of the ditch bank and appropriate erosion control measures are utilized, you should be in com liance with the regulations in the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 Keep all fill north of ditch bank. Install appropriate erosion conuol measures such as silt fence, mulch, temporary seeding, sod, etc... -� N •••---•-•-•-•-•--•-•-•---...... Ditch / � NOT TO SCALE Wetland'-••• ....................•••••: - If you need the wetlands delineated to further document this consultation, call me and I can give you '. an estimate and time when we can perform the delineation. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please call me at 7�7-4221. Respectfully, .� � � -''�7� . i Tony Brough Dislrict Technician 6N _^ CLIENT i! � a��d.. ��SV� Pa9e � of�_ �i[ _�' ' � clf.� Date % � �a-- , �� ° j�� : �� _` _ ._ �,� ;1 �, �,,, j\ � ..� . t , 'l �- : _._J "� _: (_ �. ��. .\ %.. ) . `�..t � % . ,• � � {t% l (� ' i •.," ti LOCATI ON �-� a, - � :.: Q ;_; �, t ..�_ - _ , �-�: .::,�_ .t �< . . , ' i.-• .i —. --- �. 1 ,i i� C� i r,� -� '"4 • � l_ ij � i; '� 9 •� �.: :� .. .�;c j�J' . _1 ., i _ ��% : �. ' , �; i �. • ` � c.y 1�_.,.� � , � PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AQGIIST 10, 1994 PAGE'16 � To create two additional residential lots at 1490 and 1476 64th Avenue N.E. The legal descriptions for the four lot� are as follows: Parcel A- The west•half of the north half of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Valley, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. Parcel B: The east half of the north half of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring' Valley, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. ; � Parcel C• The southerly 75.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Valley,'; City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. Parcel D• That part of the south half of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Valley, lying northerly of the southerly 75.00 feet thereojf, - City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. Ms. McPherson stated the request is for a Lot Split, L.S. #94-0�, by Timothy Strong, Strong Built Homes. The subject parcel is located in the southwest corner of the intersection of 6'4th Avenue and Arthur Street. Located on the subject parcel are twp dwelling units - 1476 and 1490 - 64th Avenue. There is a City ', maintained open ditch located along the south property line. The property is zoned R-1, Single Family, as are the surrounding parcels. The subject parcel is legally�described as the east a1�d west halves of Lot 1, Block 2, Spring Valley Additivn. The lot' was originally platted in 1941. It is 125 feet wide x�300 feet deep. It is unclear from City records as to when the property � was split in half. Staff is aware this was done prior to 1955 '; which is the first survey of record on file. , Ms. McPherson stated the subdivision would create two single . family lots by splitting the subject parcel in half and then in'; half again. The 2 new parcels will face Arthur Street and acce�s directly onto Arthur Street. All parcels for the existing ' dwellings meet the minimum R-1 setbacks with the exception of tl�e lot widths on parcels A and B. Ms. McPherson stated the some of the existing vegetation on the site seems to indicate there may be wetlands on the site. The petitioner contracted with the Anoka Conservation District who '; investigated the site and determined that no wetlands are locat�d on the site other than the ditch section located along the soutl3 property line. The petitioner will be required to use proper ' �1.� PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGIIST 10, 1994 PAG$ 17 erosion control measures to prevent erosion from leaving the site and going into the public ditch. The petitioner has submitted a preliminary grading plan which establishes the lowest floor elevation at 886 feet. The e�evation at street level on Arthur is approximately 890 feet. The Engineering Department has requested additional information including: l. Clarify the amount of fill in the front yard by adding additional spot elevations and drainage arrows on the grading plan. 2. Clarify how the shallow ditch section along Arthur Street will be handled. 3. Provide accurate first floor elevations to insure proper grades for the sanitary sewer services. 4. Provide an erosion control plan in compliance with Chapter 208. . • Ms. McPherson stated the proposed lots are not currently serviced by the municipal water and sewer services. They will be required to be connected, and the petitioner will have to pay sewer availability charges as required by the SAC. The subdivision ordinance required the payment of a park dedication fee of $750.00 per lot payable at the time of building permit issuance. The Inspection Department requires the submission of a verified survey prior to capping the foundation. The �arcel is heavily wooded with a variety of plant materials. Preserving much of the vegetation would be an asset for the subject parceZs as well as the neighborhood. Staff has suggested recording a"no cut" easement over the westerly 15 feet_ to provide a buffer to the lots to the west, and the petitioner should attempt to.save any many large trees as possible. • Ms. McPherson stated staff recommends approval of the lot split, L.S. #94-03, with the following stipulations: l. The petitioner shall provide the information requested in Items a- b prior to the issuance of a building permit. a. Clarify the amount of fill in the front yard by adding additional spot elevations and drainage arrows on the grading plan. b. Clarify hQw the shallow ditch section along Arthur Street will be handled. c. Provide accurate first.floor elevations to insure proper grades for the sanitary sewer services. . � PLANNING COMMISSiON MEETING, AIIGIIST 10, 1994 PAG� 18 d. Provide an erosion control plan in compliance with . Chapter 208. ! 2. Water and sewer services shall be provided to the dwelli�g units. 3. The sanitary sewer connection shall be made via the manh�le located at the intersection of Arthur and Camelot Street�. 4. The petitioner shall pay the appropriate connection fees';and SAC charges ($800.00 per unitj at the time of building permit issuance. �; 5. The petitioner shall pay a park dedication fee of $750.Oq per lot at the time of building permit issuance. 6. The petitioner shall provide a verifying survey prior capping of the foundation. 7. The petitioner shall record over the westerly 15 feet lots a"no cut" easement which would prevent clearing vegetation and provide a buffer for the parcels to the to �'!!the of ithe of �the we�st . Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner did submit a proposed sit� plan showing the proposed location of the dwelling units. The� proposed dwellings would be set at the 20 foot front yard setbiack as opposed to the 35 foot setback. The petitioner has appli:ed! for a variance which will be heard before the Appeals Commissiion on August 23. They are not recommending approval of the lat ' split be contingent on approval of the variance. Mr. Newman asked what they are buffering this from. Ms. McPherson stated is for the properties to the west'to from the rear lots of adjacent dwellings.� Mr. Newman stated there are no homes on the south ha�f of so the buffering is from the other back yards. Ms. McPherson stated this was correct. buff�r the �ot Mr. Saba asked the petitioner if they had any problems with stipulations. Mr. Strong stated he would like to add the definition of significant trees. To the west, there is only one tree. The ': rest is grass. He does not intend to remove the one tree. It�!,is important to preserve some of the other trees on the parcel. �f he has to move the homes back, he would have to remove some of'i the trees. The 20 foot setback would line up with the other ' homes. There is also a large boulevard there so the setback th� . ' PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGIIST 10, 1994 PAGB 19 would be the same as the other homes. There will be much fill to bring the lot up to the right level and to get proper drainage. The farther back he needs to go, the more trees will need to be re�oved. His intention is to save every tree and this will make it more attractive. On the back 62 feet of the lot split, there is grass and only one tree which will be left there. It is important that definition be changed to significant trees. Mr. Newman asked for staff's response to the 15 foot "no cut" easement. Ms. McPherson stated staff would be okay with revising the stipulation that the petitioner is to preserve all significant trees on the site and we can use the definition of 6" or greater to be consistent. Mr. Newman asked how they would submit this. Ms. McPherson suggested wording the stipulation to read, "The petitioner is to preserve all significant trees on the subject parcels outside of the areas to be filled and outside of the dwelling pad," and then eliminate the current wording under #7. Mr. Sielaff stated significant trees was based on 4" in diameter and 6" was negotiated. Ms. McPherson stated they compromised for the previous �; petitioner.� She felt they should be consistent between� applications. Mr. Sielaff asked if there was language in the code. Ms. McPherson stated there is not a definition for.significant trees. The landscape ordinance defines a large tree as a tree that is 4" or greater in caliper. Ms. Dacy suggested that the petitioner and staff ineet prior to the City Council meeting. The'reason for proposing b" on the previous request was that it seemed to be a good measure for that particular site. That site has significantly larger trees. For this site, she would suggest staff and petitioner go to the site and specificaZly identify the trees. There are different types of trees at different locations. Mr. Sielaff stated he did not want to make this too arbitrary. Mr. Strong stated he wants to express the importance of the 20 foot setback. He is planning a walkout split. The walkout is where the vegetation currently lies. From the back line of the foundation forward to the street will be filled and nothing will s S � -� survive because of the fill. The setback is important to preserving the trees. Mr. Newman stated the Planning Commission will only make a . reconunendation on the lot split. The Appeals Commission will consider the variance. '. Mr. Newman recommended the current stipulation #7 will be dele�ed and replaced with, "Prior to City Council action, the petition�r and staff shall designate which trees shall be preserved and ' protected pursuant to the recorded restrictive covenants.° ; MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to recommend approVal of a Lot Split, L.S. #94-03, by Strong Bui1t Homes, to create �wo additional lots at 1490 and 1476 - 64th Avenue N.E. with legal' descriptions for the four lots as follows: , Parcel A: The west half of the north half of Lot 1, Blocl� 2, Spring Valley, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesotal. Parcel B: The east half of the north half of Lot 1,.Block 2, Spring Valley, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota�. Parcel C: The southerly 75.00 feet of Lot l, Block 2, ; Spring Valley, City of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota. � . Parcel D: That part of the south half of Lot 1, Block 2,; Spring Valley, lying northerly of the southerly 75.00 feet thereof, City of�Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesota; with the following stipulations: ' 1. The petitioner shall provide the information'requested in Items a- b prior to the issuance of a building permit. a. Clarify the amount of fill in the front yard by addiniq additional spot elevations and drainage arrows on thei grading plan. , , b. Clarify how the shallow ditch section along Arthur , Street will be handled. c. Provide accurate first floor elevations to insure proper grades for the sanitary sewer services. d. Provide an erosion control plan in compliance with Chapter 208. 2. Water and sewer services shall be provided to the dwelling', units. ' 6T PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, AIIGIIST 10, 1994 PAGE 21 3. The sanitary sewer connection shall be made via the manhole located at the intersection of Arthur and Camelot Streets. 4. The petitioner shall pay the appropriate connection fees and SAC charges ($800.00 per unit) at the time of building permit issuance. 5. C�! The petitioner shall pay a park dedication fee of $750.00 per lot at the time of building permit issuance. The petitioner.shall provide a verifying survey prior to the capping of the foundation. 7. Prior to City Council action,�the petitioner and staff shall designate which trees shall be preserved and protected pursuant to the record�d restrictive covenants. UPON A V�ICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEAMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. Ms. McPherson stated the Appeals Commission would consider the variance request on August 23 and the City Council would review both the lot split and variance requests on September 6. 4. a MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Sielaff, to r eive':the Auqust 2, 1994, Appeals Commission minutes. IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL Vt�TING AYE, CHAIRP SON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Mr. Oquist, meeting. Mr. Sielaff, to adjourn the IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL V ING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED HE AIIGUST 10, 1994, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ADJOIIRNED A 8:50 P.M. Respectfully su itted, i? � • �r,�- � "; �"J Lavon Cooper Reco ding Secretary sV CITY OF FRIDLEY NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PRO.lECT NO 260 WHEREAS, the City Councii of the Ci deemed it expedient to receive evidenc described. ty of Fridley, Anoka County, Minnesot�, has e pertaining to the improvements hereihafter NOW, THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT on the 27th d�y` of September, 1993, at 7:30 pm, the City Council will meet at the Fridley Munficipal Center Council Chambers; 6431 University Ave, NE, Fridley, MN, and wiil at saidl time and place hear all parties interested in said improvements in whole or in part. '�!! The ger►eral nature of the improvements is the construction (in the lands and s�reets noted below) of the following improvements, to-wit: CONSTRUCTION ITEM � Storm water improvements, including grading, stabilized base, concrete curb' and gutter, storm sewer system, landscaping, and other facilities located as follows: '! STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 260 ASSESSED Those properties within the drainage area bounded by Mississippi Street on the niorth, Harris Pond ditch on the south, Central Avenue on the west, and Arthur Street or� the east. All of the land abutting upon said streets named above and all lands within, adjacenf:and abutting thereto. All of said land to be assessed equally according to the behefits received by such improvement. " Published: sV �- I �-- � �E ADDRESS SIGNATURE TELEPHONE NO. NAti / , � go� Calderom --� ' �� (� +� 6401 Central Ave �,�i.�C. �Q,(�,� �✓1 � - ��`` Fridiey MN 55432 ' Joseph Nelson � � i _ 1357 64th Ave , 6 ��-- � �/ ,��j� , Fridiey MN 55432 � �� i John� Rau i � I 1341 64th Ave , � � � � � l - Cy `7 � � Fridley MN 55432 Laura Vetter/�o.J �� C�� '� �'?� 25 6 � ' 1490 64th Ave ` Fridiey MN 55432 � SFiirley Nevala , 1476 64th Ave � Fridley MN 55432 � Dorothy Hollister 1466 64th Ave Fridley MN 55432 � Walter Eyler , 1456 64th Ave , Fridley MN 55432 � � Herbert Hart J �/�,� �,� l� C _r ��- j CT U' � � 50 64th Ave / � " "" � 14 , Fridley MN 55432 ' Bruce Olson . ,,, - % j (^ �� ..-y-- � � �j � � � ��(�- 1442 64th Ave � =1 �'� �= `� � ` `� J , Fridley MN 55432 � James Kripotos . � �C �--7 � r 6L/ �• � 1426 64th Ave %'� � Fridley MN 55432 � ' David Zerby � 1400 64th Ave Fridley MN 55432 . Stanley Dahiberg ��• 13$4 64th Ave - Fridley MN 55432 Mark Schwartz 1 � � � 1372 64th Ave � Fridley MN 55432 1� sW i,----.. FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 27 1993 PAGE 7 Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, stated that the Fridley Police �lief Association is seeking approval to consol•idate their Polic Per�sion Assoeiation with the Public Employees Retirement soci�tion (PERA). He stated that since Council passed the prelimi�nary resolution to consolidate in November, 1992, th first a�tion involved the preparation of an actuarial valuati at the request of the Legislative Commission on Pensions. He id that the 5tate Board of Investment then reviewed the pensio group's investments for any investments determined to be inelig' le for consolida�ion. He stated that after the review, s ff again met with a representative from PERA to review the i formation. He statedithat the actuarial valuation indicated th if all pensioners ele�cted the greatest benefit value, the City ould still reduce its ove;�rall police pension cost. Mr. Pribyl stated that it wa determined the consolidation wiould not have a negative impact and would provide members with pnore retirement options and sel ctions under PER.A. He statec� that �this request for consolidat' n was initiated by the Police Re�ief Association. Mayor Pro Tem Schne ' der stated that with the consol idation into the PERA program, th e is still monitoring of' the pension plan, !, and the advantage ' more retirement options. , No other pe sons spoke regarding this consolidation of the Po�ice Relief As ciation's Pension Plan. MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to close the public hear�ng. Seco ed by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all vo�ing ay , Mayor Pro Tem Schneider declared the motion car�ied animously and the public hearing closed at 8:29 p.m. 6. CONTINUATIOI�t OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 64TH AVENUE STORM Wl{�TER PROJECT NO. 260 (CONTINUED FROM CITY COUNCIL MEETING; OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1993): MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to reopen this public hearung. Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all vo�ing aye, Mayor Pro Tem Schneider declared the 'motion car�ied unanimously, and this public hearing was reopened at 8:29 p.m.', Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that Petition No. 13-1;993 was received from the residents in the 64th Avenue neighborhood for a storm water project. It is proposed that a pipe be insta�led from Mississippi Street to the culvert on Old Central at a cos� of about $94,000. He stated that this project would also invalve construction of a detention pond on the lots owned by the City at an estimated cost of $7,000, or for total construction costs" of $101,000. He stated that $41,000 of this cost would be paid by an assessment of $1,000 per residential lot, and the government woiuld fund the balance of the cost. s X r � _ � Community Development Departmer�t PI.ANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 1, 1994 ' TO: William Burns, City Manager �; FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant �; SUBJECT: Establish Public Hearing for a Plat Request, P.15. #94-05, by Biltmore Construction; Generally ' Located at 1350 Gardena Avenue N.E. The Planning Commission conducted a�ublic hearing for the plat request at its June 29 and August 10, 1994 meetings. The plat' request is to replat part of the Totino-Grace High School property into ten lots; nine single family lots and one lot for the high school. The areas of residential subdivision are located in the southeast and southwest corners of the subject ' property adjacent to Matterhorn Drive and Arthur Street. The subdivision a public hearing the City Council public hearing. MM/dn M-94-504 ordinance requires that the City Council condu�t regarding the request. Staff recommends that' establish September 19, 1994 as the date of the � . .+ � �.s tn � �f�..... ti � M � � - � ^ . 1- . wxy, ..��. - �' . � a ' �� t ti �� ; �' � � ' a � . sf ., � '"n�'" � N I �� :y � � M v � '` � � � �.� � � �l � S M � � r�l s Q_ °�V �"'1 _ � �� 3 . F � 0 � /�� tn a`� i•; i�+� y' `e� ' w ' 1�11 � � r � .. �� .^. ' • n7 � ` �*�� .� �, • , �- ' � �1 rl1 � � � , � a� � m � �"r �.� � 00 � � � v� � ..-,. .. . �'e :.. ;'!i,'/ �"�/i/P�1: � ..,r.......: ::' 'h '� � --� • • T/Ll//-.:- . •///.. ...p// ��•�'oi-/a-o:v •••-fF'7'fi/i -• ••- yav •n •n ;r Z � Z � � � r . � . �f y4-u� Keith Ebensteiner �--- .f -- t �f ' w � � . � � ' ;..:. o � IN �� ; ` < � � �� `� �. � � � � ��..� :;,.�; s ..,�� .•, ' . � ""' �aj� _ � � � O , � ` D � �" O - �� a y�- Q � � � o :� � �� c0 �� i , �� a� _ -- `�-r�=----- sis.w.y �VI --�=-- — --- ----j?------- —.� � �� "�n� ,� �� 1�� ` i �� . o � : W o � ~ v . Z � ; : � ,.�� ;� ; _ , �6 Q . � � , � ;, , � " ��LQ �_ _- . � . � N ,NE � ' tl 3Alao ~H- � N2�OHa311t/W � ' ir •1i • r 0 O O � '\ �1 � i. � ': W.N1 t � v ; �' \' �' � �. QC \' � � `�►� � OsN � i.� � � � b � •�� •ra• -r•r � ,!� �v�� ' •�if t SL l` o/ 09 � h-"if ii"-" V� 0 0/ biC tL *. � NL L 1L ♦ � .�„ ^ tr^ � � /'� , -. ,, ` FS �, .. C �,. � � �-�- r' ' `,\G��[1�r, ^�� . — ; (�: .k '' . � „l �—J, � 'Y./`_ ` �� '• � S `_ , �..•� • \� � ' � . .�_a �` � � � � � eH t rc `- r.- � S�M srs� �� r; r,: ' . �- ..-. _. _,��_�.��.. ._.. ... .._......_..:.._. . .r.�. �_ . 4"1 .. L � � \�� ,.a � ti W: � �� y ; � �•� � o . ,.� ^ : �"'c. � �: � �, ` I �� ' $ � � � ^ j h M i 06 #�s : I t i � • � r ^ �� p $ . � . .M �:=� � . '� N , OCATlON MAP P.S. #94-05 Keith Ebensteineriii _ �1 i � � - ; �' / � j M14 NOW z ' j i 4 ! - — 1 ---- �.. / .---,. i � a ' y�<<�R T DRIVE P `'t 1. 5 ' 9 � e � C;S I J 1 � �� i 2 � 3 � / � J I I .• � ° Io � � e ri (i ' �� i! � � ; r I / P g � Q '° ,� ,� , K -> >o .. , � � s � ,� i) � ,:�, � , �` �• 'I oR�� , � z�� `, ' � :a P Qp NILLCRES7 zf• rs s� 'Z`� ;'s N�oo � i/ �� „ .^� f M� 0 R�• ti:. • z . � y` � 1� 1c � o �s E, z �c .4.AKE : J�, 4� . � �r N _ `' � �Ei�C ri,� lar 1� x � 4�3 I: 4 h � � ,:� r � ' i` ` � EL L A D : - `�p uP' � � � � �11� �'' � I � � �1 ' � P'*f<<`* , (z� , c�; �.: a[-,a��,v, ; _�s ,,°'� � �1 = v. ,�_ � Op� Gp � _ . : �n rr z3, y r � -� � � � � 3 L��O ��- - - . _ _ r�qR p�-N:S't � - � �? 3 a g� � ; � ; � 4 , � ;e , ; � UAR 1 A j P �• �s ar :: �- ��-�� r � � � ZF� 1s 3� 3� l LI ,� 1 �' -- - W � p r i . 7� ` 3 . E � 6 i �� 1 � � 3 j� . . i� � � 3s �`�' ` ° s ` GI�AC£ H/GH -- ° , �,. ` sT � 6 f� j I � 3 i.� 4G^ '�4/�� ' �� , � - 1 a � i 3 Z p 6 � •i W� i�.,�� ..� \ ,.�,±:.?, B ,+ 'r Z ` � / �. J �•� N '.i �E' ,� ' �� . < ' SCHOOL ADOlT/UN '�' I A5,8f�t7'G `. t � L'--� ; � LL' - 9 �p �� — F' — - �� 4.i � , P�'C�(i k � � i0 /� �,/ _�+'�. . =.:�- _ 9 - Mi ~ � t �� T� �� „ eas � x � � - z r .__ A Q v � . � --� of P Iat � .� �- `� .,. : � d . � ..� � �� i : i3 �.... i�T -, -: �, : �:.- I � •�r- _,.— - � � �, s r. , . , �� ,� ' ' . . . -- �� 7� 3[,3) 78id9;4c 4/ �2 /�Z 3 6 S'� 7iB v e q ` S � I •• p•• •: �••• �M� Y AN '_ ` b i i� � t e i a • � • � �� NORT 1 \ 9 P 9�6 S 4 7. Z , /.Z � •��. •�. I� • l • __ b Z3Z4 � E � � �2 � y i S � 3� � •• �'�� iioy�, ' �C?V�UG�J� 3 Z � + P 2 • � •! • • "i' • • 4 y� ! r� ; c�' � "",� • • • �' a 9 w i ! � ��CL �� • • � DktvE " 3 5 ,� T � 3 •� � '� �. • � • :•5 i ;� + �R-rH " ,�- • • a• , 9 �,lr�,.� � • � , ' ADfDrT'�OIIi2 � , - - 5 ` � NS � �� •; � . ,: . . . . ,�: ; .... _ ' . �� , g,Q : .� •:.� • . • , • - � . lJC�. �7 .a • � i . . • �,�� _ 3 _ : A � T._.r. • � � • • • 1 ^ � ' " t � z � L� a ` !r�' � � + i� t -' 4rif( - . - � --- � �/�` � '� ' Yf'�T' • - �_,: _ - - . > ; ` `, � _ q : . . �- j i2 �. � Z.� �--� �I"1� � �:`� � /`.' '; % ',% � _ .� , • L - ° ;�- z ,•� • � • � .�; � a� r� • � � . ,�.:_. . `. _ � is� _. „ ! /7`f� w � }� f�}•�, �- T • • ; • i �4 ' " s : � /Y,L! 4 � 2 ; .�_3 ��1,-j--� •, sb«.�. .� .� } � ,_. _qw_, ,`- �+` � ��° �- . 2 . _� �� _ ••, �,` •��i 1 • • • �-�-'r'• •~F• - � — _ � ° : ^ N _ . � � � - ,_`_...-- � � , � 5 ,��f• n� ��%1�� s .-! -i�T� M-�' a i Y�� . - z � E ;�;.,.� �� . . ~ , �- �--� / �� . . � ;zg, : \ , .;;. . : z .� . ��pP�= �AKELAN�-- � __ _ _ `_� t �� .� � ,t' • 1. _ �S. . • St�E �� 1 - ; /o/!ey vrew Z • ' • �. P� a 1 N E I G H T S ' Cn�; s�ion ' ; � � � � �, DISTRICT LEGEND ---_ h � ` CAuiCh 3 � �� , �-7 �� 4 Z Z R-/ ONE FAMIIY DWG'S L: M-1 L16NT INDUSTFIAI :" IJ _` p-2 iW0 FGMI�Y DWG'S ❑ N-2 MEAVY INOUSTRIAL � /� R-7 GEN. MUITIPLE OWG'S � VUO GL�NNEO UNIi OEV. �� I_: �0• ��++ R-4 MOBILE MOME VAHI( ❑ 5-t NYDE oARK NEIGNBO1�MOOD ❑ -. P VUBLIC FACIIITiES ❑^ 5-2 REOEVELOVMENT DIStPICT � I,- �� _ C-1 LOCAL BUSINE55 J p-1 CREEN b NIVEH VqESENVA710N J S �J S � � ��' � C'Y GENERpL BUS�NESS 0 O-2 CRITICAL ANEA �, �i •' (^� T . C-7 GENERAL SNOVGING Ki1 -' 4 r JO � ' � � W f-q� GENERFL OfFICE :� VACA7ED $TFEET$ . �. R � � . 7B ZO�VING MAP r � � . Community Development Departme�t PI,ANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 1, 1994 TO: William Burns, City Manager ' FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator ; SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #94-21, by Riverpointe Limited (Meadow Run); Road N.E. Imaginality fo� 7855 East Riv�er ISSUE ! At the August 23, 1994 Appeals Commission meeting, the Commission evaluated the request by Imaginality to install a 24 square fobt sign on the property line adjacent to the right-of-way at 7855 East River Road N.E. (Meadow Run Apartments). Section 214.09.O1.0 of the City Code requires a minimum distan�e of 10 feet from any property line or driveway. ', The entry gate feature that exists at this complex will be I resurfaced with stucco and the center monument will be removed, The petitioner does not want to reconstruct the entry island td meet the required 10 foot setback from the property line. HISTORY There have been two cases where a 0 foot setback has been approved. These sites are the Medtronic facility at 7000 Cent�al Avenue and the Grace Evangelical Free Church at 7436 Melody , Drive. APPEALS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Commission unanimously concurred with the petitioner and recommended approval of the variance request. ; STAFF RECOMMENDATION � Staff recommends that a modification to the entry island will ' allow the code required 25 foot aisle width and still provide I; adequate space for a sign that meets the required 10 foot setback VAR #94-21, by Imaginality September l, 1994 Page 2 from the property line. An illustration has been attached to highlight the potential alternatives. Staff recommends denial of the variance request to allow the sign to be constructed with a 0 foot setback due to the alternative sign locations available. SH/dn M-94-517 : '1 c:r'CY Ol� l+'k.lUi.F.l' - fL7 (r�31 IJNfVf?RSl'!`Y AV1�.NC1E N.l�.. ( — ',' rr�l��l,r�,v, 11IN SS�J.i� � (C;1.2)571-3�5O ��ONfMUNi'!'Y l)t�,'VI:i.UP�•iF_NT �EPAft'fn�1�:N'I. VAR�IA�TC'� A�'I'I�ICATI(�N rO�M l'KC)Pr�t'1'Y INrO�iI�tATt - site plarl requircc� for submittal; 5�e �tt�ichcd A�Idt�e.titi: � � £ . '�' 'vt�( (Z�ct� _ _ Pi•c��.>erty rdenti �c�ttion Ntt�ttl�cr (PIN) � 33 `� z '� �-1 3 "`'�_�P - Le�.�l desc;ri�t;on: _� �� fi � b� c�ce � r� e�1��w ��.�.. .� S+ Uc�cl ;+�c �, Lot . 3. _ R(vck _. � TracUild�lition tY1 � ac�v �.:; _ 1-�+ c�cac� ;-a- � � �, Cutr4nt •r.vni,�g: _, Q' l3._.y_ Scluarc fo�ta�ei�tc,-eage °� � 7� a�. f.��' f"' Reasc,n fo�� v�•iance sind h�-dtihip: �2 e ��-�` Q� _ ' . ._ . Srction of C.ity Gc�cie: _�(�{; t 1 — Have you o��er�tecf << buSjrlHSS itl a city whicb requircd a bufiinr:ss 1ic:ens�? ' ,r Yes . No � tf yes, wliich city'? . !f ycs, what typc af busincss> __ ,. . .. . Was th<<t liccnsc �ve�- d4nicd c�r revok.cd'? Yes No '. �.�..a..,.....,�..,...,.�..�,�,.w,...�._,...�..,,..__��..w..,..,.�....��._ �,r.._._.w�...�....�.....�..,�..�._....y.....,..._..�.�._,...�r.r.._;��.'.,�. X� GE UVVIV�+,R ii�T��'41tMA'1'1(1N (as it appcars on th� I�rc�pc�ly ti.tic) , (Cc�nt.r,tct. Purch��scrs: Fee Qwt�cYS tr�ust tiiL;n this Cui't��7I'1<)1" il) �)1'Oi;cssing) ' N.4iti1� �� i�� /G�,.�1.� � \ Y1'� � �(._ C� (�,1�`-Y��.'(�cj � 1 p - — ,� T)T) kL'S S �-%,:: � rY� 5 �'�C� Vk� e m �- �-'� ,.( �1C --�� C ��--�' IG1Ce ('� � _ � (S _ � ' �111_ S� � . D��YT[MF. FF�ONL s�i� - %�,5�',�-'� 5iG N AT� �Tt C_ . . .__ DATE � Q�--• -_''_ i'L'I`I'I'it)i�'f�'1 iN�+'rllZM,4.`I'I(?N N A�4 E -�- YY� c�r �, � ci ��-%-� �- �(1 L AL�L�Itt:w �� t � Z �� x S_S -- ---- �._. -_� � �� _ �r, rc�.�� (,1 flc _ � �J 53`f� � L�AY't'IMl� ['[��UNF_ �� s--�i � � St(.►N�1TC!Itl: _'i�: ��p��_____ _ I—_Un�I�E_ _ =�--=�—�y--- ._...----�--��_ ,_�._. .�%' .._.. .-----�-�-:. ..._ _._..... _ ..._._.__. __�._._._._.�.�_....__ . ., ... . .-._. ._ ..._. f ��: :{�1 CX�.(X} `1� (i0.(.X) ---- ;F�i�' t'C.sicJ�nti:ii p��c?pc'r(i4s 1'cr�r�it VAK # �—?�� Re<:ripk �� 3C:��__ . _ ,' /lE�j�li�'atit�r� rt�Ctrivc.il by: _ __ _.__. �c;he<lulcc! APpcals ('Onir�iis.siiu� iJate: _. . _�^ .� Sc�hi•c(u(cd C'ity Cou��ci! <l,itC.: __.. . .__ ....... .__ r� -. E n H .� B -_ rJ ;± � I_I -�)' �� Z��i�!' -P`I _ _ • _ t�!>` � ��..I-Z�� '� � �31 .'•.��.II<�� !•.lI�� August 5, 1994 Scott Hickok City of Fridley 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 � Dear Scott, The foilowing is to go with our sign variance application to briefly answer the questions posed in the appeals process section. At the time of the meeting we will present pictures and further details. REQUEST: To have a variance in order to place sign within the 10' setback, We request a 0' setback. 1. We want to install our entrance monurnent sign in a position that would make it visible to oncoming traffic from East River Road, prior to the point of turning. 2. There is not sufficient property on which to install the sign in such a manner so that the sign could be visible - the sign needs to be perpendicular to traffic and double faced. 3. We intend to remove the existing stone monument structure from the current entrance island in order to make room for the proposed sign. 4. With the current regulation of a 10' setback, one end of our sign would be in the midst of a two way drive through. This would be hazardous and disrupt traffic. 5. We do not believe that increasing the center island curb area into the two way drive would be reasonable because it would not be even with the rest of the drive - it would protrude into a critical area. Turning radius for large trucks (which people use to move) and snow plowing becomes very difficult. We are concerned that this may be hazardous to drivers and the sigr� is more liable to be damaged. In addition there would be a significant additional cost in the new island and maintenance thereof. 6. Granting this variance would be of no harm, materially or gen- erally to the public or the property. This is made to enhance the beauty of the property, the neighborhood and reduce the opportu- nity for accidents, due to sudden stops and turns. Sine�e, ly, . I/: Myrna rensten President cc: Bob Levine, KMS Management, Inc. : VAR ��94-21 �+�s� y � Z " ` ? � �., `'-� ""Imaginality Inc. � .� � � _s J ,� �-� � _, o � � �� • � � �� "'� ��, � � -,;,;;� .� � �`� � 4;, '� --3 �;;.� � �' � u �� ' � �� ``� .� � � � ;� � � �f�; • � �, � �� -., � ;-,� �y „ f"� ``'� r.'� � ,.,� � �``� � � ' � , � � � ;r � � �, „� � . � < .\ �c� �� \.\ � �-• \ �r ..� F`3 �-+� � � � � �..? � 4� �,^" � � 1 � `,,,�. � � � � �� / c„� � .�- r,,� `C,.. � .� :; 4� .� � �� `°`� �'; -.� �' �,`� . �:�� '- �'^ �„� ,...r > �� '�'l r"L. ` 'a. !" �'C"i — � � . L^ . . ,r• . , 1 ti% .�-.!�_ "' . �� ' . _ _ - r+ ��.`� :.r �i r"� , � � '�I � �.� %_ / �� • "' r,// .t E: w� �( ,� � Rli� . , �� . � . K €� J �;, � z �� ' ti3y� �. � ELr / � � � �� , � � W ,\ � P > �' , a , '. ERTY ST. Z / �� O r � - = z� Q '�d � �NC�_:.�ow _ Z --� � `. . .,� . . . . . �� ♦ � 69 � �� ; , ,� �. t� s � �•ti : • �a . � �� 9 e � Q�pQ`' ' � t � � . � ' V S �' , 1� � .� MAR -LEN ADD. � �±��- ',. ':�� • .•-... .... _• •.! � � • • • • • • � • s • • • =r��• Z ` .��• • .�,.�•�•. • • •�•� �\ • • • �� •� ��139 • � \ • • • • • � t7 � � ' MEs± • • fryl� • Z ' . ..• • ♦ �� . •�2 ��'��d��• � � •��•r � � � � . • '� -1 � • • • • • � � �' �l'�� P• �; '.'l�r.'. •.�.v ♦ • • • i • • � o r�'� � . • � � � � ' • `�� n • • � �� • �A • «•. � ' I i . i �� NO� �Q�� DISTRICT LEGEND 11-1 ONE f�YiLT DWQ'S LJ Y-/ 116MT IMOUSTIIIAL Q �-j T'NO F�YIIY DWG'S �❑{ Y-7 MlAV'I INOY�TIII�L f(!7 q-� CEM. YUlTIOIE OM�G'S :::1 VYO PL�MM[O UMIi OCV. �CI! II-• MOBIL! MOME P�NK � !-1 N►O! a�AK NL16N�011MOOD L.J 0 VUB�iC f�CIIR�lS 0 S-2 NEOEVlLOIY[M7 DISTIIIGT Q C- 1 IOC�I BUSINE57 ❑ O-1 C11C[R i RIVEN OIIl4l�V�TtOM � C-= GENEa�I BVSiNES3 �p O-t C111TICAL AN!• Q C•� CENER�I SNOPV�NG iAl �-Ri �.EHERAI �iF1GF ❑ V��.ATlO STqElTS � �..1 8D ZQNlNG �IIIAP� VAR 4�94-21 ' Zmaginality Inc. I Z�(3� �b� ��'�� "I"'f�'.� k�•� � -- .:.;, . r . , ,` r:. . a .I Z �:_...__: ; r' %�, ��1�___ • �.� .� � s o �9 STREET � ', °' I z z° < 2b~'''�'�icr " .s � �fi. ..-y-��or, �, ':��I - • � • � '� �i /� < <)�S•='� 3) �J ii 3� �41 � � �_ c , � �2 '�i 9 `6 - �6 's 24 » _ �/% 5 � Z � 9 *7 +"6 = 3� j/ �C � S �� .�,c Y :o . (/ �/ y) � " ' � .,, � -� Q � � a 7 c � .e - -� (3 ) �9 �j�� . - '. - � I a � � �. 3e "� � :t . . �, �l e .7 .�` 3c � �' � � ' I�, �S/. ' 2 � ` � . '_ '-.�� % �3 It � ) (/ ) �J )_ � � 3/ � . *= '1 �l�qa // .L /: 4 S /! /� �1� ii 1c' % .0 3 4 � 4 % F Jc /� /. a' �.1 /� �� t ..i 'c � � � '' �'�. _.^ .� z -- .z / �¢ � ,_' s: � � ` s ' f � � % i i l. �' � l � � ! �j�� .. � ^:: ; �a_ � �o T� �; � � _ � 1..�,� vd, -"='`` s-_� '� � ��,0'- . a _ QlTJO/Y'� ;; ► ��DIT/ W � ,: - r� � yg •i9� . . _ � ; ,�: r�. � .... \ i �• . ''° �� i � 7 �� ^d� , • q G_ %%1 �r i�.� 8�(�� , • ��3.� ! -,� �`-��9: �f,� � '� �1 i. � , 's _ z16 ,;��. �� e S9 � • � 5 � �� , i• � � ti ,• ,4 , ,;�Q a g >. �� c;. . . � ,_�50— � CORNER \ (w� '. 3 �� Q 7r /' ��) 2 1 �� •�;;: c,�. ATI� 1-: s_� �R �s . r$ isT �>> � c -� — � '�� .-,.� �, �. �. ''•' 'M • .. � /n' n .,-- - ; 7895 78�� RUN 3 7szs � �� , �■ � \� 4 . • „ ', � s. .� » , � ` � ---= -«o> � � . �- — — — -- ,r� .�:., ��5�; �� '.7� — � � — j62 — �y( _' � `!� M � �( . � %J� o :e ,` ' ,s , : A .i' , f //p) . .. ' � �( ` � ,3: ' - � ` p,� �� ` � ' = ` � .; fo, � v` _ � �3 - .4 �' PEARSD ' - _ - � , � o,a � ' � 1 cl 1bb - �r l `s--- ,�� `#l_ r' • \� � �� % �,$) - ; . ,� s �r� �33 _ 2ND�9� y� wr J ' .. I 9� � �.�s; C�> , � �°' ' o, 6.r (�� ` ` �'� ADD N �. ,�7 (3>_ �:. � ` - 3pi .. ,�' ' � �✓y s,'�.- _ ��- � � _ �. �� . �. >> ., . � � �'� -�. : �ocAT�oN M�� .- �, � � . f o� � �� ,� . ,� . �' � � � � �.� . m � . -. G� � � c� � -_ `. , . , � /� '�.: �� .P� - ��y P , f�,. .� _ . , ��o: _ - �� . __ � , ` .p� = � �, . � � , -o \- . �:�. �►� . � 0 � � � � - � � H � , �,' "" - d v � - �-- �. . n 7 � . � � � � N - � � �` r �� y � � , �r � � � Sj �� Imagir � � �� s. � � --� � : : :::;,: ,;;. -- ._-.:.., ,. tt` � - G� ''� -:=' �' . � ��;; :'�; �;,.:_ •.-..-. . � �� - � � � �'��'"` � t. �'"`�'�� : � ._ . :: ,., ,., �;: :::_ � y: � �-,== � . .1, ._ 2 . _ . :::; ..;.: _ `� �� - � � � == a , - � �, :�_ � � � � .-�-� `' .�` � �� y�► �- �o �, . � y \ �� . � a'� � ` - �� _ � � � ► � s �� ' - �� ° � v � � -� � �� ` _. � � � o � � �o� - � _ � � �- � �� C� � - o .- � �� . �✓ ' �_ Zt� \ � , O , � � ��- � �" � \� / � � �S. \\(7 `, _.. • � � • � , '' `�' =:. � _ :;� . j.�; �'. _ L� ` � v� � -� •. : • . , . ` `��':: ;:. O � � r I � `+ ` ,I� � ma n � `"� ` � � y , , :�:. ,. 2. ' .:-.: ;:, � -� , �, .:-.._;:. _,� .;;:_;. � ..-.:-:: ;:�:�. �_ � � . . �, .� � .� : :: . �`' � '""'� .;.: ,� � . �, :: :. . � G � �� ' �" . �► � _ � �=• . ��► ` �PN = .: _ r �. � � � � � ::.:: ;:::;.. ,:.,, ; .:�, �. � - . ;.. :,:-:. ._;::,.�;., ` --^ ; � ;;;=;:=, ...i--_ . . � . � 1 / ) ,� i,� 4�� . � • .yt. :.`. _. . V `i� ��.i` \" .. ��;;�;�� .. . � - ' . � � ` ��i;�� ' —{sa3_.:�,, • ' � '�� - ' �� • , �� ` � � � ��i ��_ �-.t::�:-=�' . t� ` ��' - -� �-: �;;: .,. . _•.L; - � �� ; �.: = 'y: � � =- — ` � . ;': ': _ ° � .s i - .. � \� R - . � �� P i ' • . �� : � • t� ` . • � ��;;\ .z ,s o:--_ -- �.::- _ . . . ,,. ,: � � =_ -, � ° - �.; � .--� a . . � � �/ 1- ,; .��':-..�.. .�` . � • ` O ` •�. � � � �• � . . - � - -� �� . � ` � ��► . � . �v� � t��-o �, � a . :o , � . �� ti� � . .. t . ,r ;: <��--_, ; �, � . l� �� - ,► __s�` z� 1�'t - _ � � _ . �" '�,� � -. � . � � =:: -: �:. � �� r R►`�' � � Z. -_.� . � . `�, � � � .- �:��- ° -t� - . `-'' _ � �� .: �: .�-- - � _ �� - � ' � ' -` . �O � � � � � � . �t� � r< t/� � � . � „o �� . �n � � - . '�' � `- - � �� o 0 z � �' �, �z ` 1� �.� � . _ � � . a - cD �`' � a� ` ` �� n � � T t'`�► �o � \ . ; � om M� 1 J � -` !_ / � � O � � 1� - �// '■� Q D � t�„ . t� � � N � Z �7' 0 � � � , O Zm � � v 0 i � � � �I/ ` �. � � `� ` � S- \\( G � �� VAR 4�94-21 Imaginality Inc. � S.F. �`g,�� c� m e�nS i o nS � 1�2�wee�. �'��o.c� FXTII� OF `►ARIA�S GRi�Dfl� 1986-1993 Case No. Address Code Section Title I 88-18 7770 Ranchers Rd. 205_18.03.C.(1) Maxim�un lot coverage 9'0-15 590 Kimball St. 205.07.03.0 Maxinrmn lot coverage C 87-05 6501 E. River Rd. 205.14.07_D.(6) Screening strip 91-33 501 Glenco� St. 205.07.04.B.(2) Min. structure size C 88-05 5351 Central Ave. 205.04.06_A.(6) Fence height 91-10 7905 E. River Rd. 205.04.06.A.(7) Fence height. C 89-07 1001 Hillw�nd Rd. 205.16.04 Building heic�t Parking setbacJc- I 86-17 250 C.a�ner,ce Cr.S. 205.17.05.D.(5)(a) public right-of-way Par}tir�g setbacJc- C 86-24 7699 Viron Rd. 205.15.05.D.(5)(a) public ric�t-of-�ray C 90-05 5205 Central Ave. 205.15.05.D.(4)(b) Driving aisle 91-01 6180 Central Ave. 205.16_05_D.(4)(b) Driving aisle C 92-21 7620 Univ. Ave. 205.15_OS_C.(1) Parking spaces Parking stall length Parlting stall width Driveway/ C 87-24 7315 Highr,�ray 65 205.17.05.D.(4)(c) Intersection Distance C 87-38 6257 Highway 65 214.11.02.B Sign area � � 90-20 6881 Highway 65 214.09.02.B Sign area C 86-05 7810 Univ. Ave. 214_11.02.0 Sign area �C 92-05 7000 Central Ave. 214.12.02.E Sign setback 92-25 7436 Melody Dr. 214.05.06.B Sign setback 8� ` PAGE 2. Required Granted 40°s 49.5% 25% 28.6% 15 0 768 712.12 8 15 4 7 45 52 20 0 20 0 25 20 25 20 102 13 20 1 10 9 75 19 80 s.f. 224 s.f 3 s.f. 80 s.f 25 s.f. 34 s.f 10 0 10 0 APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 23. 1994 ___ PAGE 9 is level so there is no need,for correction. It about four inches . above the 100-year flood level. Mr. Kuechle stated the house looked like it was below the dike. Mr. Maher stated when sitting in the living room they can see the Mississippi River. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr.� Vos, to close the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:03 P.M. Ms. Smith stated this is an unusual situation where there is discussion about side yard or front yard. In this case, what is referred to as the back yard is the side yard. If this was considered to be the side yard, it would be within the code and would not require a variance. The public purpose is being served, and there is plenty of green space. She would vote for approval. Dr. Vos concurred. The foot print, even with the addition, leaves a lot of green space. The lot has the corner cut out of it so they really cannot move it anywhere and still put on the addition. It makes sense. Mr. Kuechle agreed. Although the way the rules are written, it is not a back yard. It really functions as a side yard. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr. Vos, to recommend approval of Variance Request, VAR #94-20, by Monte and Michelle Maher to reduce the rear yard setback from 40 feet to 30 feet on Lots 16-21, Block W, Riverview Heights Addition, the same being 7965 Riverview Terrace, to allow the construction of an addition with the stipulation: 1. Special Use Permit, SP tt94-12, shall be approved. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE DECLARED TIiE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. McPherson stated the Planning Commission would review the special use permit on Septe;nber 7 and the City Council would review the request on September 19. 4. PUBLIC HERRING• CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REOUEST, VAR w94- 21 BY IMAGINALITY INC. FOR MEADOW RUN APARTMENTS: Pursuant to Section 214.09.O1.0 of the Fridley Sign Code, to reduce the setback of a sign from the property line from 10 feet to 0 feet to allow construction of a new sign on Lot 3, : APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 23. 1994 PAGE 10 Block 1, Meadow Run First Addition, the same being 7855 East River Road. MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Dr. Vos, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:05 P.M. Mr. Hickok stated the variance request is to reduce the sign setback from 10 feet from the property line to 0 feet. The property is the former Meadow Run apartment complex. Between 1970 and 1972, three buildings were constructed, along with a recreational complex and a swimming pool. Along with the construction of that complex was an entry gate feature which includes a large bollard with a stone face on either side af the entry. On the island between the entry and exit lanes, there is another monument with stone face, and the sign for the complex was on that entry gate. The petitioner wishes to take out the center monument and build a new 24 square foot sign perpendicular to the roadway with a zero foot setback. The requirements in the R-3, General Multiple Family Dwelling, require a 10-foot setback. Staff reviewed the request based on the following criteria: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and district. Staff reviewed the site and feels that, for the most part, there are many other examples of similar complexes that have similar conditions and have been able to construct a sign within the 10- foot setback dimension. As noted in the staff report, Georgetown Apartments were granted a variance to less than 10 feet due to conditions on site. The variance was granted to approximately 5 or 6 feet from the property line. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the subject parcel. B. That the enjoyment property : denied the variance is necessary for the preservation and of a substantial property right possessed by other _n the same vicinity and district, but which is property in question. Staff feels this is not a unique situation and that other complexes with similar circumstances have been able to live with the 10 foot setback dimension. C. That the strict application of the Chapter would constitute an unnecessary hardship. �•� ►\ APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 23 1994 PAGE 11 Staff after review feel denial would not constitute a hardship and the petitioner could according to some alternatives install the sign according to code. D. That the granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare, or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district in which the property is located. The purpose of the sign code is to limit the number, size and location of sign in order to reduce visual clutter. Staff feel that granting this variance would be contrary to the intent of the code. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner has submitted a letter, included with the staff report, which states they feel there are circumstances on the site to make the variance necessary, including: 1) to install the entrance monument to make it visible to oncoming traffic prior to the point of turning; 2) there is not sufficient property to install the sign so it is visible - the sign needs to be perpendicular to traffic and double faced; 3) to remove the existing stone monument structure from the entrance island; 4) the current setback of 10 feet would place part of the sign in the midst of a two way drive through; 5) to increase the center island curb into the two way drive area would interrupt traffic flow and add significant cost; and 6) to grant the variance would be of no harm, materially or generally to the public or the property. Mr. Hickok stated staff has indicated there are alternatives. One alternative is to reduce the size of the two-way drive aisle to 25 feet and move the center island curb back which would require reconstructing the radius on the back side. Doing so would leave 19.5 feet from the curb of the radius to the property line. Staff feels there would be adequate space in that area to construct a sign. The petitioner feels this may cause additional problems due to traffic. There are parallel parking stalls along the edge of the parking lot. The petitioner could add a radius to the entry sides the same distance and delineate these parallel parking stalls. Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner would prefer to keep the sign perpendicular to the roadway to make it visible to those who travel along East River Road. Staff feels the complex itself does its own advertising and there is a plan to match the color scheme on the building with the sign package. Another alternative might be to place the sign parallel with the road way which would allow to see the sign at the complex. Mr. Hickok stated, in the past, the Commission has approved a sign variance to less than 10 feet. Staff feels the petitioner has not met the four criteria for granting a variance. Staff has no : � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 23, 1994 PAGE 12 recommendation at this time; however, the request is within previously granted variance limitations. Ms. Smith asked where the property lines are located. Mr. Hickok stated the property lines are where the bollards are current located. The center island extends beyond the property line. Dr. Vos asked if the monument removal would 5rovide better site lines when going�down East River Road. Mr. Hickok stated staff discussed this with the petitioner. He thought there is a toss up between this location and pulling the sign back. He felt pulling the sign back nay actually increase the sight lines. Ms. Orensten, Imaginality, stated staff co.:��nents indicate the purpose served is to control visual pollution and eliminate the potential for signs which conflict with driver visibility. As they look at the complex, they don't see the sign un�il right at the complex. There is then a right turn into the cor..plex and another immediate right turn to the parking lot. They �eel an attractively designed sign will enhance and beautify the ent�ar.ce to the complex and not be considered visual pollution. The p=cposed sign area is also planned to make sense with the landscaping. The area is extensively landscaped. The current sign or even a new sign that is not perpendicular could be considered a haza:d because it is not visible until just before the turn. They a�e proposing a sign which is visible 200 feet before the entrance at 0 foot setback. If the sign is at the 10 foot setback, they fee� t��e distance where it would be viewed would be reduced both fo� �::cse coming in but reduce visibility for those inside the ce-;ple�_. Ms. Orensten stated the purpose of the sign �� is to limit the number, size and locations of the sign �r c_�� pollution. They disagree in that �ney �_ additional signs or a larger sign. The ? oca�� ^ makes a great deal of impact on the f�c:�: c: complex. Bringing the curb out �f�it^�:? �___ additional cost which is the hardship. __._� __ �o reduce visual --e not asking for . : 3ck from the curb �r�ffic within the :.omplex would be a:so affects snow storage and removal. They are upgrading �^:e e::�_=� complex pa�t of which is to remove the monument in the isla^w, ��moving the dark lava rock from the bollards and re-stucc�;ng _^�'�, and upgrading the landscaping. Ms. Orensten showed photos of other complexes and their signs. The proposed sign for th�s complex is a very tastzful sign to enhance the complex. She showed a rendition of the proFosed sign at the current setback within the existing structure an3 showed another version of the same sign with a pedestal. Th�ir concern with an � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 23, 1994 PAGE 13 extended curb in the island is that the driving lanes would be reduced and then the turn would be to tight. Dr. Vos asked Ms. Orensten her reaction to the alternative setback nearer the building. . _ Ms. Orensten stated she thought this would do more harm than good. There would then be no visibility before getting to the complex. East River Road is a busy street and, if someone not familiar with area and looking for the complex, they often almost drive past and then slow suddenly to make the turn. The proposed plan ac�ually decreases the number of signs. Ms. Smith asked if she had gotten police records to see if there were traffic problems in that area. Ms. Orensten stated she understood from property management that it is tough traffic area so they wanted to get the police reports to have some statistics. They have talked to them to find out what the problems are in that area. They have not received the police reports at this time. Mr. Kuechle asked if they had considered turning the sign 90 degrees. Ms. Orensten stated by making the sign parallel to the street becomes the issue of visibility to the oncoming traffic who is being�addressed. Mr. Kuechle asked if the addresses are given by street or by the complex name. Ms. Orensten stated it would normally given by the street. Mr. Levine, KMS Management/Meadow Run, stated the signage issue is part of a total upgrade. They acquired the property in May. This was the only property in the City which did not have emergency lighting which they have now installed. The property had five underground storage tanks of t�hich three were leaking. This has all been corrected. Al1 buildings will have new roofs. The indoor pool is being redone and an outdoor pool added to the property. They are doing a tremendous amount of cosmetics. As owners, they feel what they are asking for is reasonable and ties in with the whole upgrade. An interesting thing about the property is that, inasmuch as the property line is really at the sign, it appears to be at or near the roadway because of the location of the landscaping. Their intent is to take down the monument, remove the lava rock face and re-stucco so what is left is a sign that appears to have a setback. The other signs will be removed so there will be one attractive sign. The alternative of extending back the island is a hardship in that it creates traffic problems as well as � APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 23, 1999 PAGE 14 additional expense. They felt the money would be better spent on safety concerns. W�at they are proposing will improve the overall entry and the property in general. Ms. Smith asked what they would do if the variance were denied. Mr. Levine stated felt the alternative would be to put a sign parallel to the street. Tne existing monument that is there is now on the property line as are the monuments to the side. Ms. Orensten stated�, if they needed to get permission to do that, how would they get the same 10 foot setback given the structures that are existing. The existing structures are already on the property line. They could put a sign on that wall of the sign in the center island but it would not enhance the project. Mr. Kuechle asked if the monument in the center island would be removed. Ms. Orensten stated yes. Mr. Levine stated he saw the survey when he acquired the property. They had thought of keeping the middle monument and bring a sign out over the planter so that the front post would be at the planter which is over the property line. The side monument also encroaches on the property line. The only way to install a sign and keep it behind the property line is to take down the monument which will clean up the area and make it more pleasant. There are also parking problems and they need all the spaces they can get. Ms. Smith asked, with the existing monument already encroaching, if they do anything to the signs, do they need to make the request to change a sign. Mr. Hickok stated yes. The changing is asking for a new sign structure. It could be argued that these are signs and not entry gates. Removing the signs at the gate would bring us to a new permit situation and another variance. Mr. Levine stated the Meadow Run sign is in the ground in front of that wall. He has a hard time believing that cosmetically resurfacing an existing wall has anything to do with changing the structure. Ms, McPherson stated this technically �hould not be in the public right-of-way; however, it is not a structure that they can attach a building requirement to. It is rather an aesthetic enhancement which does not fall under the setback requirements. Once you put signage on it, however, that will trigger a variance. : • APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING. AUGUST 23, 1994 PAGE 15 Ms. Smi�h asked how far from the property line the center structure was located. Mr. Hickok stated this was approximately 2 feet from the property line. Dr. Vos asked if the County had any plans to widen East River Road. Ms. McPherson stated the County has not yet improved this section. She was not sure where this is as far as the County improvement plans are concerned.� She thought the County had adequate right-of- way to do their work. If the County moved the curb line, the sign would be closer to the right-of-way. Mr. Brandt, 190 Craigbrook Way, stated he did not agree with the request to put a sign on the property line. There is no obstruction in front of the apartment building going north or south. Setting the sign 10 feet back should be no reason a person could not see that when driving by. If someone cannot see that sign driving by at 10 feet, they ought not to be driving. Visibility should have nothing to do with it. There is no obstruction. You can see that sign for a long way going either north or south. This is a residential area. Some of the signs shown earlier were not in residential areas. A 24 square foot sign at 10 feet is adequate. They have enough signs there now and he did not think they needed any more. Ms. Smith stated she drove by the complex and did not see the sign. When going by during rush hour, traffic. moves quickly and it is difficult to see. She asked Mr. Brandt if he was aware of any accidents or traffic problems in that area because people did not see the signs. Mr. Brandt stated he had never seen an accident on that corner. Ms. Olek, KMS Management/Meadow Run, stated the way the curb is now is very tight and, when traffic is entering, they must stop for traffic now. Moving in the curb would make it more of a problem. MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the publ.ic hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE ISECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:53 P.M. Dr. Vos stated he drove into the complex. He would not be in favor of moving that curb any closer in. You have to look to the left to see anyone coming in that lane if turning to the north. Moving that curb back would not be advantageous. The monument being taken out should enhance the area. He vote in favor of having the sign C1� APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, AUGUST 23, 1994 PAGE 16 placed in the island. He was convinced this was as good as any place. He would vote in favor. Ms. Smith stated, when she came to the meeting, she was inclined to vote:against the request. But as she looks at the alternatives, her sense is that for the public safety the 0 foot setback would be advantageous. It would clean up that area and give the visibility the sign needs to turn into there. Traffic does move quickly on East River Road. The sooner someone can see the sign, the safer it would be. Mr. Kuechle concurred. Of all the possibilities that are there, moving the curb back would have a negative impact. He can see moving the monument out and putting the sign there. He would like to see the sign self supporting rather than between the posts. That would narrow the sign down somewhat and perhaps bring it in not quite to the lot line. - MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to approve variance request, VAR #94-21, by Imaginality Inc. for Meadow Run Apartments to re'duce the setback of a sign from the property line from 10 feet to 0 feet to allow construction of a new sign on Lot 3, Block l, Meadow Run First Addition, the same being 7855 East River 12oad. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON KUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. McPherson stated the request would be reviewed by the City Council for final approval on September 6. 5. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #94- 22, BY GARY LARSON: Pursuant to Section 205.07.O1.B.(4).(a) of the Fridley City Code, to increase the allowable square footage of a first accessory structure from 1,000 square feet to 1,220 square feet, and Pursuant to Section 205.07.03.0 of the Fridley City Code, to increase the maximum lot coverage from 25% to 26. 8 0, in order to allow the construction of an attached garage addition on Lot 3, B1ock 3, Riverview Park Addition, the same being 7121 Riverwood Drive N.E. NOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to open the public hearing. UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, VICE-CHAIRPERSON RUECHLE DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:57 P.M. : � i � C, . Community Development Department PLA�NNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 1, 1994 L- TO: William Burns, City Manager� �T�' FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Grant Fernelius, Housing Coordinator Approval of Service Contract with Anoka County Community Action Program for Administration of Home Improvement Grant Program At their February 7, 1994 meeting, the City Council allocated $124,612 in Community Development Block Grant funds for housing rehabilitation. These funds are to be used to provide grants for low income homeowners for basic code repairs. As you know, because of the considerable amount of time involved in administering this program, the City has contracted with ACCAP to help process applications. This year, we received 20 applications for assistance, and ACCAP has already begun some of the preliminary work. Attached is a summary of the program requirements, and a copy of the contract. The only change from last year's service contract is a 1% increase in the administrative fee ACCAP collects, from 10� to llo. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council approve the service contract with ACCAP for administrativn of the Home Improvement Grant Program. GFjdn M-94-514 City of Fridley Hcme Improvement Grant Proqram Summary Introduction This special program provides financial assistance to low-income residents who need to make basic code repairs and home improvements. The assistance comes in the form of a no-interest, deferred-payment grant up to $15,000. The grant must be repaid when the home is sold, however the actual amount to be repaid depends on how long the owner continues to live in the home. Year Pay Back Required 1 100$ 2 90% 3 80% 4 70$ 5 60a After the 5th year, the balance of the grant or fifty percent (50�) must be repaid when the home is sold. To ensure the grant is repaid, a lien is filed against the property. Eliqibility Requirements 1. Must meet income guidelines based on household size. Household Size Income Limit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 $17,850 $20,400 $22,950 $25,500 $27,550 $29,600 $31,600 2. Property must be an owner-occupied single family home or duplex located in target neighborhood (see map). 3. Applicant's assets (excluding home) cannot exceed $25,000. . � City of Fridley Home Improvement Grant Proqram summary Paqe 2 Improvements All properties selected for the program will be inspected to determine the necessary repairs. In general, repairs are limited to those which correct code violations or substandard conditions such as: - Electrical and plumbing systems - Heating systems . - Windows and doors - Health and safety (i.e. smoke detectors, handrails) Remodeling a kitchen or bathroom, or other strictly cosmetic repairs are not allowed. Selection Criteria All applicants who meet the eligibility requirements will be considered for the program. Points will be awarded for age of property and the applicant's income. Those with the highest scores will receive first priority. Others will be placed on a waiting list or referred to other programs. � * * * Equal Opportunity Employer * * * SERVICE CONTRACT betwee� ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACT[ON PROGRAM, INC. and GITY OF FRiDLEY THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 19 , the date of the signatures of tlte parties l�erein notwithstand'uig, by and between the City of Fridley, a public body corporate and politic under the (aws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter rcferred to as ttic "City"), and the Anoka County Community Action Program, Incorporated, a SOl(c){3) aioii-profit corporation, with its of�ces at 1201 - 89th Avenue N.E., Blaine, Minnesota 55434 (hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor"). WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, Title II af the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as ar�zended, provides for a program of Community Development Block Grants; and WHEREAS, tl�e City of Frid(ey has submitted applications for receipt o[ said CDBG and HOME funds; and WHEREAS, said applications have received approval by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the expenditure of said funds for, in part, delivery of the Fridley Home Improvement Grant Program in the City of Fridley; and WHEREAS, the Contractor has agreed to jointly administer said programs for the Ciiy, which proposa! has been accepted by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, ui consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM 'I�i�e project to be accomplished by the Contractor hereunder shall be from August 1 � 19 94 and stiall be c�mpleted at the earlicst possiUle date and in any event not later than July 3 1 19 95 , unlcss carlier tcrminated as provided herein, or until all obligations set forth in this agreement havc hccn satisfactorily fuifillcd, wliicf�evcr occurs first, 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED /�. 'ilie Cuntractor shall do everythiug necessary tc� insurc tlie proE�cr administration o[ the Pridlcy Ilc�mc Improvemcnt Grant Pro�r:im (licrcivaftcr rc[crrcd tu as thc "I'rogram") as 9C approvcd by tt�c U.S. Dcpartmcnt of Housing and Urban Dcvelopment (hereinaftcr rcfcrrcd to as "IIUD"). In ac;complishing said projcet, tl�c ConiraCtor agrees to furnisli, during thc tcrn�s oC this agreement, the fol{owing services: (1j Verify titte information, prepare and executc repayment agreements with program rccipienls. (2) Conduct property uisQections and prepare bid specifications for work to be performed. (3) Assist property owner ui securu�g estunates for the rehabilitation work. (4) Assist property owner to award work to construction contractor. (5) Insure construction contractor compliance with the applicable HUD regulations. (6) Monitor performance of construction contractor work. (7) File/record necessary lien documents. (8) Conduct final inspection of work completed. B. In addition to the processing steps outlined above, the Contractor shall perform the following duties: (1) Compile and maintain lists of participating construction contractors. (2) Comply with the Housing Rehabilitation Procedures Guide, as amended from time to time. (3) Provide the City of Pridley with monthly reports on the status of program , appl ic:a t ions. (4) Make payments to c;ontractors on a timeh• basis, ui complianee with the Federal "threc-day rulc". (S) Acyuire mechanic's liens Cr��m all conUactors, subcon[rac;tors, and material su�plicrs_ C. In addition, the Contractor shall }�roceed with tite administration of tlte Program as u�ntaincd in thc Nrobram 13udgct, attached as l:xhibii A and madc a part of this contract 2 . � by refcrence, rcprescnting Contractor's minimum resE�onsibi(itics to ttie extcnt that said proposals tiave not been ac:complishccl F�ri��r to tl�c datc c�f this Cautract as entercd into and to the extent said Pro�osais do ne,t ce��itraclict [1te standards and requiremec�ts referred to above_ D. Il shall be tl�e respo+isibility of thc Coiitracior to mcci all standards and satisfy all • rcquiremcnts expres.sed in Titic I of thc I[ous;ng aud Conununity Dcvclopment Act of 1974 as amended and the IiUD Implenicntary [2e�ula�ions at 24 CPR, Part 570, and any other ap�licable federal statutes, rules, or rcgulations established now on c�reafter, and any appiicable statutes, rules, regulations, or guidelitics establislied now or hereafter by the State of Minnesota or any of its agencics. Should it appear to the Contractor at any titne during the course of implementuig said project, that ttie work to be done has not been expiained or descrbed in sufficient detail, or with sufficie�at clarity, or should it appear that any plan, proposal, or other material conflict with any standards or requirements imposed by statute, regulation, or HUD, the Contractor shall promptly apply to the City's designated representative, Grant Fernelius. In no e.vent shall the Contractor proceed with administration of said project ui uncertainty. The Contractor shall comply with the following requirements and standards of OMB Circular No. A-122, "Cost Principles for Non Profit Organizations" or OMB Circular No. A-21, "Cost Pruiciples for Educational Institutions", as applicable, and with the followutg Attachments to OMB Circu(ar No. A- 110: (1) Attachment A, "Cash Depositories", except for paragraph 4 concerning deposit insurance; (2) Attachment B, "Bonding and Insurance'; (3) Attachment C, "Retention and Custodial Requirements for Records", except that in lieu of the provisions of paragraph 4, the retention period for records pertaining to individual CDBG activities starts from the date of submission of tlie annual perforrnance and evaluation report, as prescrbed in 570.507, in which the specific activity is reported o❑ for the fival time; (4) Attachment F, "Staudards for C'inanciai Managentcnt Systems"; (5) Attachment H, "Monitoruig and Reporting Program Perforniance", paragrapli 2; (6) Attachmcut IV, "Property Manabement Standards", cxcept for parabraph 3 concerning ttte standards for real property, auci except that paragraphs 6 and 7 arc so modificd so that (i) L► all cascs in wl�ich �crsonal �roperty is sold, thc rrocecds sha(I bc program income, and 3 �� (u) Persona) property not needed by the subrecipient for CDBG activities shalt be transferred to the recipient for the CDI3G program or shatl be retaincd aftcr compcnsatuig the recipient; and (7) Attachment O, "1'rocurenient Standards". 3. PRO.IECT METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURE � The Contractor, in providing the secvices descrbed in Section 2 of this Contrad, shall employ methods and procedures that are deemed to be appropriate, reliable, and professiona! by individuals, fi�ns, and associations regularly engaged in work of a similar nature. The methods and procedures employed shall include those required by the sources of authorit3+ speci6ed in.Sedion 2, herein, but shall not necessan7y be limited to such methods and procedures. . 4. PROJECT EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE In order that the City may be kept informed of the Contractor's progress, may properly evaluate the success of the Contractor in achieving the Contract goals, and may make suggestions, criticisms, and recommendations to the Contractor, the Contractor shall on a monthly basis and at other times upon request by the City, send a written progress report to the City's designated representative, Grant Fernelius. Said report shall: Summarize the adivities and progress of the Contractor to date, deta�ling specia! , problems or difficulties that have arisen during the course of the gro�ect which needs to be brought to the attention of the City and summarizing any other information, problems, or proposals which the City needs to know in order to properly evaluate the adions of the Contractor in working toarards the Contrad goal. The Contractor shall thoroughly and conscientiously implement the proposals, reoommendations, and criticisms of the City's designated representative, Grant Fernelius, or others designated by Grant Fernelius, in writing, before proceeding further with the implementation of the program so that the goals of this Contract may be met to the satisfadion of the City. Any deviations from the goals, standards, and requirements of the projed as determined by said designated representatives of the City shall be corrected by the Contractor beEore proceeding further with the implementation of said project. . 5. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION, PERSONNEL, AND RECORDS A. The Contractor shall engage in the implementation of the Program, such individuals as are necessary for its proper completion. The Contractor warrants and represents that all of said uidividua(s shall be properly trained, and shall be competent and qualified to perform the tasks assigned to them. The Contractor shall provide the City with such information regarding the quali6cations of said individuals as is required by the City to verity that present and subsequent scrvices arc being rendered by competent and trained people. All individuals engaged by the Contractor to perforni services under this Contract must receive express approvai oi tl�e City before comn�eucing any services under the Contract. Any or all of said iudividuats may bc regutar emptoyees of the Contractor or may bc 4 � � specifically employed by the Contractor as independent contractors to work on the impiementation of said project. However, the Contractor shall not subcantrad with any othcr [irnis, as.sociatio��s, consulting agcncics, or othcr organi�ations for the implementation af the Program, without thc expressed wriucn consent of thc City_ i3. The Contractor shall maintain records on all individuals employed Uy it in the implementation of thc Pro�rani. Said records shall sliow the name and qualifications of .. .. each such: individual,. the hour(y rate, of pay for.each such uidividual,. and �he; numbeF of . .. hours worked by each such individual, acid the days on which such hours were wocked. ' The Contractor shal! also mau�tain, and complete in correct form, a11 other records required by the rules, regulations, or guidelines of HUD or by Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended and the HUD Implementary Regulations at 24 CFR, Part 570. The Coritractor further agrees to maintain all such required records for three years after receipt of fmal payment and all other pending matters are closed. 6. DATA PRNACY Al( data collected, created, received, mauitained, or disseminated, or used for any purposes in the course of the Contractor performance of this Agreement is govemed by the Minnesota Govemment Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes 1984, Section 13.01 et. seq. or any other applicable State statutes and any State rules adopted to implement the Act, as well as State statutes and Federal regulations on data privacy. The Contractor agrees to abide by these statutes, raies, and regulations and as they may be amended. 7. NONDISCRIMINATION A. Genera! The Contractor shall compiy with all federal, state, and local laws prohbiting discrimination on the basis of age, sex, marital status, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or the presence of any sensory, menta(, or physical handicap or any other basis now or hereafter prohbited by Law. These requirements are speci6ed in Section 109 of the I-Iousing and Community Development Act of 1974; Civ�7 Rights Act of 1964, Title VI; Civil Rights Act of 1968, Title VIII; Executive Order 11063; Executive Order 11246; Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968; and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363. Specifica[(y, the Contractor is prohibited from taking any discriminatory actions defined ut the HUD Regulations ai 24 CFR 570.602(b) (1-3) aetd shall take such affirmative and corrective aciions as are required by ihe Regulations at CFR 570.602(b)(-l). These requirements are summarized 'u� tl�e following paragraplis: E 9G I3. Pro�ram Benefit Thc Contractor shall not discriminatc against any resident of the project se�vice area by dcnying bene6t from or participation in any block grant funded activity on the basis of race, color, seu, or national origin. (Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI; Civ�7 Rights Act of 1968, Title VI[; Section 109, Housing and Community Development Act of 1974). . C. . . . �air• I-Iousin� : . . , . . • � . - . . . . • _ � . . • � . The Contractor shall take necessary and appropriate actions to prevent discrimination on the �basis of Minnesota State law or federal law in federally assisted 6ousing and lending practices related to loans insured or guaranteed by the federal government. (Civ� Rights Act of 1968, Title VII; Executive Order 11063; Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363). � � D. EmploYment 1. In aIl solicitations under this Agreement, the Contractor shall state that all qualified applicants w�11 be considered for employment. The words "equal opportunity employer" iu advertisemeats shall coustitute compliance with this section. 2. The Contractor shall not discriminate against an employee or applicant for employment in connedion with this Agreement because of age, marital status, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap, except when there is a bona:.fide occupational limitation. Suc� adion shall include, but not be limited to the fotlowing: Employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selectiou for training. (Executive Order 11246 as amended and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363.) 3. To the greatest extent feasble, the Contrador shall provide training and employment opportunities for lower income residents within the area served by block grant assisted projects (Section 3, Housing and Community Development Act of 1968, as amended). E. Contractors and Suppliers 1. No contractor, subcontractor, union, or vendor engaged in any activity under this Agreement slia(t discriminate in the sale of materials, equipment, or labor on the basis of age, sex, maritat status, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical haudicap. Such practices include upgrading, demotion, recruiting, transfer, layoff, termination, pay .,��• 9H rate, and advertisement for employment. (Executivc Ordcr 11246 as amende� and Minnesota Statutes Cliaptcr 363). 2. Ali firms and organizations descnbed above shail i�c rcyuircd to submit to the ' Agency certificates of compliance demonstrating that they have, in fact, complied with the [oregoing provisions; provided, that certificates of compliance shall not be requircd from firnis and organizations on contracts and/or yearly sales of less ... . . .. . � . . . . than $10,000:. . ,� . . . . . . . -� . ' : .. . . '. . � . .• � . . . ,.� 3. To the greatest extent feasble, the Contracior shall purchase supplies and services for activities under this agreement from vendors and contractors whose businesses F. Notice are located in tlie area served by block grant funded activities or owned in substantial part by project area residents. (Section 3, Housing and Community Development Act of 1968, as amended.) The Contractor shall inctude the provisions of the appropriate subsections A, B, C, D, and E of this section in every contract or purchase order for goods and services under this Agreament and shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice advising the said labor union or worker's representative of the commitments made in these subsections. 2. In advertising for employees, goods, or services for activities under this Agreement, the Contractor shall ut�lize minority publications in addition to publications of general circulation. 8. EARLY TERMINATION This Agreement rrtay be terminated by ihe City at aay time, with or withoat cause, upon 30 days written notice, delivered by ma�1 or in person, to the Contrador. This Agreement may be terminated by the City immediately upon the receipt by the City of notice of the loss of federal funding for the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) or HOME program. For purposes of giving notices hereunder, the address of the Contractor is 1201 - 89th Avenue N.E., Blaine, MN 55434. Upon termination, tlie Contractor shal! be entitled to receive as compensateon, payment for work actually performed to the date of termuiation as determnted by the schedule of payment referred to in Section 10 (Compensation). - � 9. DEFAULT AIYD REMEDY A. Any of the followiug constitutes a de[ault on the part of the Contractor: 7 91 �2) re to procced with the implementation of the Program at a pace reasonably lated to implement sucli program within thc time limits stated herein; Failuro to conscientiously abide by the criticisms, proposals, and recommendations of the City; (3) Failure to abide by any otl�er terni or condition of this Contract. B. In the event of default, the City shall have tl�e option of terminating this Contract upon writtcn notice of tern�u�ation sent to the Contractor at its address written above. Trrmination shall be effective immediately upon receipt of notice of tern�ination by the Contractor, or at such later date as the written notice shall state. Upon tertnination, the City may recover from the Coniractor any and al! damages directly or consequently arising out of the breach of this contrac[ or fa�7ure to perfotm the same by the Contractor. 10. COMPENSATION As complete compensation for the services to be performed hereunder by the Contractor, the City shalt reimburse the Contractor ot� a cost basis for the necessary services provided by the Contractor pursuant to Section 2 of this contract. In no eveni shall the total payment exceed the sum of the administrative fee column in Cxhibit A. Payment by the City shall be by mail and sent to the aforementioned address of the Contractor within thirty (30) workuig days of billing hy the Contractor and only upon receipt of a b�7ling statement from the Contractor containing such information as the City stiall require. The Contractor agrees that all compensation received from the City wiil be used to compensate the Contractor only for costs incurred in provid'nig necessary services hereunder, and for no other purposes. Any compensation received by the Contractor ui excess of said necessary costs shall be promptly refunded to the City upon termination of this co�itract or upon demand by the City. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR "I�hr relationship uC the Contractor to the City is that of an independecit contractor. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed so as to dc;em any employee or a�*ent of the Contractor an employee of the Ci[v Eor any �urE�osc:. 12. GOODS AND SERVICES NOT PROVIDED FOR Nu riaim for goods ��r scrvires Curnished by the Contractor nut prc�viciccl for by tl�e tern�s of this Contract, ��r l�v dulv authorizcci ;iltcrfill<)(1S OC t]lOCI1�IC3U�l[1S Of IIIIS Contract, �vill hc (iunorcd hy thc City. 13. C�[ANCES IN THE CONTRACT t'hc City shall i�c�tify thc Ccintractor in writing at Icast fivc days hcfurc auy chanbc in this Contract is to � t-l�J takc cffcct. 14. ASSIGNMENTS AND �UBCONTRACTING A. T1ie Contractor shall not assign any portion of this Agreement without the written cc�nsent of !he City, aiid it is further agrced that said consent n�ust be sought by the Contractor not (ess than thirty (30) days nriar to the date of any propased assignment. B. Any work or services assi�med or subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each provision of this Agreement and proper bidding prqcedures contained tlterein. The Contractor agrees that it is as fully responsible to the Citv for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors �and of tlieir employees and age�its, as it is for the acts and omissions of its own employees and agents. 15. 7NDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City (includ'u�g its Council members, officers, and employees) from all claims, losses, or damages whict� they, or any of tliem shall be legatly obligated to pay as a consequence of any negligeut act or omission, any u�tentional tort, or any violation of tl�e terms of this agreement, by ttie Contractor (including its officers, emplu�-ees, and agents) in the performance of its services that are tl�e subject of tliis agreemeiit. 16. REVERSION OF ASSETS Upon ttie expiration or terniination of this agreement, the Cocitractor shall transfer to the City any CDBG funds on hand or in the accounts receivable attributable to the use of CDBG funds. In addition, at the expiration or termuiation of this agreement, any real property under the Contractor's control tliat was acquired or improved ui whole or ui part with CDBG funds in excess of $2�,000.00 shall be disposed of ui a manner whicli results in the agency beuig reimbursed in the .amount of the current fair market value of the property less any portion thereof attributable to the ex�cnditures of non-CDI3G funds for acquisition of, or improvement to, the real property. Sucl� reimbursement shall uot be required if the conditions of 24 CrR State Statute �70.�03(b)(8)(i) are met a►id satisficd. 17. DISPOSITION OF PROGRAM INCOti1E Upc�n tlte c�E�ir:+tic>�t <�r tentiinatic�n <>f this agreen�ent, ��rc>�rar>> inc�>ni� s{ta;l hc rciurnee� bv the Cu��tractur tc� thc ('itv. 18. INSURANC� l�h� Contractur shall cc�niply with thc following insurancc royuircntcuts: 0 9K A. 1'ublic I_iabilitv Insurance "l�he Contractor shail obtau� and maintain continuously during thc terni of this agreemcnt general liaUility iusurance oC au amount not less than One Miilion and no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars which covers bodily injury and property damage and an umbrella excess liability policy of Three Million and no/100 ($3,000,000.00} Dollars and provide proof of Worker's Compensation Insurance pursuant to the Statutes of the State of Minnesota. The general liability insurance policy and umbrella excess liability policy shall name the City as an additional u�sured. I3. I'roof of Insurance The Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance required under this section, or, upon request of the City, duplicates of the policies as evidence of the insurance protection afforded. Such insurance policies shall not be reduced or cancelled without sixty (60) days prior written notice to the City. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/REOUIREMEI�IT OF A WRITING It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that this Contract supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relatuig to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous Contract presently ui effect between the City and the Contractor relating to the subject mauer hereof. Any alterations, variations, modificatians, or waivers o�' the provisions of this Coutract sha(1 be valid only when they have been reduced to writu�g and duly signed by the parties. 20. EXHIBITS "Ihe follawuig attachments listed below are hereby incorporated 'ui this agreement and made a part hereof: l�xliibit !� - Program I3udget Exhibit I3 - Ccrtification r.��a�<< c-�.� cra ss; Cositracting with sma(1 and minority firnis, women's business enterprise, and labor surE�lus arca firti�s. IN �VITNESS �VEtEREOF, the partics herc licrcuncfcr set thcir hands as of tlie date written t�elotv; 10 9L CITY OF FRIDLEY 13y Datc: By Date: 13v Date: Approved as to from: ANOti�► COUNTY CO�i�tUN[TY ACT[ON PROCRA.�I, I\C. t3y Uatc: �y Date: 11 9M Exhibit A Program Budget Total % of Available ' Source Total Admin. Total to Program � I 1994 CDBG $124,612 $13,707 (a) 11.0% $110,905 C1►� Exhibit B CERTIFlCATION The Undersigned, on behalf of the Agency, certifies, to the besf of his or her knowledge and belief, ihat: - (1) No Fede�at appropriated funds have been paid or wili be paid, by or on behalf oi the undersigned, to any person for influenci�g or attempting to influence an officer or em��oyee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in con�aection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federai grant, the making of any Federa� loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extei�sion, continuati�n, renewa(, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2} tf any funds other than Federa! appropriated funds have been paid o; wilt be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an ofificer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an o�cer or employee of Congress, o� an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or coope�ative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure rorm to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shap require that the language of this certi�ication be inc(uded in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that aA subrecipients shal! certify and disclose accordingfy. This certification is a materia! representation of fact upon which reliance �vas placed ��hen thi� transaction was made or entered ir�to. Submission ot this certification is 2 prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section i 332, title 31, U.S. Code. ARy pzrson tivho fails to file the required certification shaif be subject to a civil penaltv o` no: less th�n 510,000 an� not more than S100,000 ior each such failure. AGENCY By: Its: Date: . � By: Its: Date: ___.----- ------� (24 CFR 85) Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State, Locat & Federally Recognized Indian Tribal Governments (e, c.on«ar.ing w�tn smol/ onc minvri :v jrrms, women's business ence: p: rse and lnbor ssrplus areo ji ,r„s. (i) The grantee and subgrante- wili take alt r�ce�• �.y afftr.r.ative step� to assure that mino:ity firms. women's business enterprises. and labor surplus area firess are used when possibie. � (3j Afiir,aative steps saatl include: (i) Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business er.te:-pryses on solicitation lists: (iiJ Ass:::iag that snali aad r.�.i:,ority � � businesses. and wor.ien's busiaess entecprises are solicited whenev=r tney � 2r� po:en:ial sources: � (iii) Diti•iding total reQuirersents. w�er. � economically feasible. into smalier tas;cs { c: qcan:ities to permit maximu.� ; , pzr:icipzt:an by small and r..ino^t�• � . , ous;:�ess. z�d wor.ier.'s besiness � e�.�e: �rises: � (it•) �s:a�[:shiag d_!iver3• sc:^,ecules_ � n_. _ i::e : eq::i=a^;e : pe_^iu. µ• :i�- e:::.c�:age �a::i�ipat:c : bti� s-�1: a :c n:norit�• besiness. z.^.c x•o^en's 5:.is:^ess e�;P�=ses: i��; l.'r.^: cne se:z•ices and essister.ce ' c: : :e 5-a:: �usiness �crr.i�is��::c :. �..c t�e \�:^�:it�• �_s�QSS Deveic�r.:e-: ,;�ea�_, o. .^e De,:a::-:e^,_o� Ce-.-:e:-e: (�'ij ne^� i�: !�e ^e contra� - ,. ::�cor.::z_:s are :c oe e:. te taxe :.._ .: -n�t��:e s;e�s fistec' in parag-�=::s ' >�i'1 t;1 ; .ro:;.� 'L•; o; tnis sec;ior. � • � Exhibit C � _ � Community Development Department PLANNING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 1, 1994 f7' �`- TO: William Burns, City Manager � FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Resolution Endorsing Leasehold Cooperative Tax Status for Properties in Hyde Park Anoka County Community Action Program (ACCAPj has submitted an application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) to acquire and rehabilitate one four-plex and two seven unit buildings in Hyde Park. The purpose of the project is to create affordable housing for single, low income individuals. The three buildings will be owned and managed by ACCAP as a leasehold cooperative; the tenants will not own a share of the cooperative as is typically done, but they will lease the share from ACCAP. The leasehold cooperative properties are taxed at a lower rate than typical multiple family rental properties (see Assessor's analysis attached). ACCAP is requesting that the City Council endorse the project and support the lower tax rate on these properties. The properties to be acquired include 6008 - 2nd Street, 5908 - 2 1/2 Street, and 5916 - 2 1/2 Street. All of the buildings were on the market for several months, and ACCAP has executed purchase agreements with the three owners. The estimated tax loss for the three properties is $1,394 per year. After further evaluation, ACCAP decided not to pursue an application for the two four-plexes on Channel Road. According to their consultant who is preparing the applications, the Channel Road project did not meet the funding criteria as well as the applications for the buildings in Hyde Park. I did request that ACCAP pursue acquisition of the buildings anyway so that we could pursue a rehabilitation project. ACCAP tried to negotiate a financing arrangement with the owner, but unfortunately, they could not come to an agreement such that ACCAP could purchase the property with its own funds. ACCAP did find another four-plex at be eligible for an application for from MHFA. This project would not 380 - 57th Place which would a transitional housing program require the leasehold Leasehold Cooperative Tax Status September 1, 1994 Page 2 cooperative status. Because the Channel Road project did not proceed, a letter from the Executive Director of the HRA was submitted in support of the 57th Place application using the same approach as we did on the Hyde Park property. This will have to be approved by the HRA at its September 8, 1994 meeting. Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council adopt supporting a leasehold cooperative tax apartment properties in Hyde Park. The rehabilitate a total of 18 units which well as provide affordable housing for BD/dn M-94-5I6 1�' the attached resolution status on the three proposed project will are in poor condition as Fridley citizens. RESOLIITION NO. - 1994 ° RESOLIITION APPROVING ANOKA COIINTY COMMIINITY ACTION PROGRAM LEASEHOLD COOPERATIVE TA8 STATIIS IN HYDE PARR WHEREAS, the Anoka County Community Action Program (ACCAP) provides affordable housing for low and moderate income individuals; and WHEREAS, ACCAP has executed purchase agreements on three multiple family properties in Hyde Park (6008 - 2nd Street, 5908 and 5916 - 2 1/2 Street); and WHEREAS, ACCAP intends to use HOME funds and to apply to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for funds to acquire and rehabilitate these units; and WHEREAS, ACCAP proposes to operate these apartment units as leasehold cooperatives; and WHEREAS, the rehabilitation of these buildings is consistent with the City of Fridley's housing program; and WHEREAS, the Fridley Housing & Redevelopment Authority has agreed to provide rehabilitation assistance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES�LVED, that the City of Fridley supparts the ACCAP project to operate the three multiple family properties as leasehold cooperatives; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City endorses the property to be taxed at the cooperative tax status rate. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF _, 1994. ATTEST: WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 1: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR ( � 6 /Y 1 0 �� 61 ST AVENU�--� __ _ _ �---�_�! _ _ � 3 �, . .o .. .. � ,.. .. -- z - � i v' ._ _-_ + a z ,_�,� ,/'— ' �," { , ^ _ _ . ^ _ _ - ' . _s �, y . � 2 r1 , L -v r_" r . . � �;9 ,R,. � Y - ` . . -- - ... _ - - ' '3 a I �__ -_ _ - -.—. --"- — , - ` . ._ -,`r�}— - --' - =.1 -s .. ' ^ � `� - = - - - --� -- . . - - - � ` . r � r ;i -- --- � { `3 - -- �_ .r, � :� ! _ __ - — : — — _ . z i �i ' - - - ' ,. , . . , t =- - ,-- – - :–� _ _ ~ �' - - � _ _ . - :� ; t , . , __ _ , , , • _ :. _ � = - � L- ; -- — - - . � � � ' � � �_� , • � . - ; , _ -_ _ - -- - . . ?, I - ! , � . 1, � - � �� - --i � . - � . � � � _ ! `' _ � . � ' � � -- - - ��- } ' + ,:: , ! �oo� � +, _ } r _. ' � . . •� . - . _. _ _ . ` _ _ _ . - � � '� . �N ._�.ir � . . . _ ' ' . , OTH AVENUE - -� --- _ � �-- � ��__ - f -- . = --- i`y � `.h � � " a t - _ � . -_ - - ..� -_ �- � ' _ , r • - a . • � 26 �! 5 5 <"i .o�. ` - f " - =' -- � }}} � • � � 1.i • . 't - tl "��"' ' 4 � � " _ Mr � V , ; r - r _ . .: ` : - __ Z - � _ , i , � (aJ ---, W � .r . ` - _ � . Z _— tT1 _ w � . z 5916 -- �-- � . . �-�� _ _ - •., ` f z �. � ' .- - � _ �•�:_- , , ��+� � . - - � I -:N• µ: /y. ,s« -. F- V�O� r " �'_ ? ' . .y N > - r � ` ~ , c ~� v� N r �.,', i �r � :,. , �I,,.. t � � . � � N ' „ , i � � -�-'- -•:° ; : �, .a �� I • 59TH AYENUE N.E. �. „ , , � � �� .� ,. r1 ; f 7 ; "-� - � : � 2 O 1 > � ,�o � � � . _ . � , - ' `�• � -• 4 t ' !" ,�1 ; .� � r�9 f' 29 �, � ` <9 f : <9 � -�� -;,i7�.''�_-' ` �� F" T /^'. �T'. 2B �,j'.� � 2a = ��. ' p =-�r3- � •: � ...: `� N � � „�. � � +c N _ s � ,' � � c � r' - ? d -s � , f "•' - „ �. S �s � N., �:� s - � ",z6 W = .y zs;�; ` �a - � �zs � � ' z` � - 59 TH '-2� 1 2„ • .� Zy ; ., - "�''p' � � --- ��.:i � ,i�' � � j a ;' - . � _ _ ' � � _�, � � f� ` } - - .j i . � � �, � � � .+. I � _C L -G � ��G � � ., . G `% _ _' � • r y • . , .� � � -' . .) ,r �� .,i2 i9 ; .: ;9'.f' _ ,.- 1 i ,� �l ie ,3 � �e � � � �o , � _ a � ,: < „r . ., i� � �� i¢, i� �, s � � ,� � � � ; ��. � � i6 / � � /F i� rf; .� / . 3.T�'j _ N � ;1;�� ` ,::Z �f < AVENUE ° z. � 58TH iV-:E.� � ;..,�. � , - ` . ,.'; , � f . : f � - . ,�, • � . , � . �,.;.� • ,,. � � ,o �� t ! 3 . � � i , , N � " ` � _ � � � - o er) Y�i � Z,; 2 .s 9 ? '.i�" 2 . =` 9 � c ' 2 - Z 9 , j •� ' �� c t :� 1 3 �d ��3 c, �N B� �.o : �r) _ : , . ` � • �d d J� ^� q 9- 'a . 4 ,•'� Iv� a � - ^ tc�� ' 9 � i�r'r � 4 � ' 1: ' • _ _ ""G "Mi � S ;t� 7J)6 � �' °'1`-- 'O • . .. ,� 5 � .� _ ' S - � �o . =+ AVE. > N.E:,...:,` co , % x �� `� I �J � �� _ �. I . � • ��l �`i? 'h .� ; w " ».� � ,,�.d �*1 ;n � �;rT c �_ . j, ..� f •( ,/ !'`�' � [ 1 �43G 7B y;iv7 ��,��q� �Z345 ,.��9 icLi/2/'./4jSi�'1�� 2��.,_�.t �e c� '�.r^7f:,'0�.. � i" `�, , i ,�� ,� ,�:;; ,� � � �,� , � ,f r:. ,i'� � ' -t �r - - � ---- -r--- . � :.SZ.TH : ��,.. f,,.. .,�. PLACE " i ; .. .. � - - � .. � ! '� {:� � : j � . - • I '� /' I . � �, ry ♦ �� .�. ,,b ' �ttil � �� - ��,^�a��L.�' 1� � � _3C7' � ?� !�, ��G 3�F�° /c!. , =1 � I.� . � - r� r . _q.� . is . . � I�''N t' _ _ CtTY OF FRlDLEY FRIDLEY 1VIUNICIPAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FRIDLEY, MN 55432 •(6l2) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 August 23, 1994 Ms. Kathryn Hadley Commissioner Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibley Street Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Commissioner Hadley: I am writing this letter in support of the Anoka County Community Action Program's (ACCAP) application for funds under the Affordable Rental Investment Fund. The proposal is to purchase one four-unit and finro seven-unit apartment buildings to provide low income housing in Fridley. The apartment buildings are located in a neighborhood in Fridley known as Hyde Park. The Hyde Park neighborhood was identified in the City's comprehensive plan as a"primary focus neighborhood." A recent 1991 market study completed by the Maxfield Research Group also identified this area as in need of rehabilitation and redevelopment. ACCAP's proposal to acquire, rehabilitate and manage these buildings is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan and housing program. City support of this project will be provided in the following ways: 1. On September 6, 1994, the Fridley City Council will be asked to approve a resolution endorsing the tax status of the properties as "leasehold cooperative" properties. Those properties are taxed at a rate which is equivalent to the homestead rate. The tax savings will help ACCAP to provide affordable housing. 10D Ms. Kathryn Hadley August 23, 1994 Page Two 2. At the August 11, 1994f Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting, rehabilitation assistance was authorized for this project. The Fridley HRA will provide a grant of $45,000 and will also provide a $45,000 low interest loan (5 percent over 30 years). The HRA's participation represents about 50 percent of the rehabilitation costs. Anoka County continues to have a serious shortage of !ow income housing options, including low cost rental housing. The purchase of these apartments would allow the needs of individuals and families for decent, low cost housing to be met. The City of Fridiey has worked cooperatively with the Anoka County Community Action Program. ACCAP is an effective provider of housing. I very strongly encourage the award of grant funds to this project. Sincerely, ,��!�,,.� ��-�.�-- WiNiam W. Burns City Manager/Executive Director of HRA :rsc 10E - — �. � � N //4 COl�NEF � l S C. �.3 - � - ----.j-t---- -___-_------ -------- -- ---; �s� „ -� .�e?� � •je• _! � w 1 :,� � ^,. r � �� .� �� , ;� •. .J ��I^ . - S_.i� �l ; _ • S 2,. P /i^ '� t �� r �� . 2° �a _ � �? �c . � �� ' i ,�. j �i•�.� � � �" ri+2c' r �A . Y �° Z � 3 ��'1 2 : �;�,.. Z ,.yi�1 Z� i G , .` : 11 3 ' �28 -¢ ' {-� ; ,�>>�2' i, .s `� ,:1� 2" t �l i' � 7 c.` � `" ' ; � � � ,� ,i R' � � Z� _ � 5 � . _ ,..--- - , , � , � s o � r� � _ � 3 ,,�, ; s _'L6 - - �� 5 --; � �, e • 6 ` ^5, � 2 : �5 u .� 6 � <" .� 6 i �++✓ ZS+o�: d � �. 1 4 z 5', e, -- -i . 1 > ' _ ?w � � x � , � . C 3 �� 4 , gAc- --7-- z4 -•y�'�--� � Z Z4 � r: �� " za 6 =' : Z.; . 23� : 6 �� .. _ + --- --� + - -2� - Y` � , 0 2 �'�' �, 7 5 � Z s� � 'S` g � �z 9 - - . �� ' ' g ' y, - �n .ti. ,� � I 22 'p�' \ t � w /o ., 2% '_/O , ` � �__� . ..� � !� � �,� _ � � � i _s � � �y v� �" pp � � \ b ' �/ � � `CS ,� y ;� + - 1 .. +1 _ � a \. wl ' /9 ia ,� ' _ /Z . W � `+ 1 , . ? � • ,� g�' . - ?' � S ._ . � � !8 ' /C � '_ , - }� . a [� .rr� ^ � ,` — . . - -� Q , - - - . � . � . t � � v '� _ '; . , - —.— '. ... , , • `�'p TH A�ENUE . N. E. : - - - -` � "_ , - � . - �--= , - _ �- ' . . ., , _ - -�ar, --;— _ '__ T �. - — ---- � - �. . _ � - ' - � -- = - ' - � --- - _ - = • T _ ; - 4-- ,�-- _� _ � - - -- - y �. W r-,J_=_ - -- . , _._..- � � 1 _:___ - ' . _ _ � ! � L � - _ / '_ --_ � �. . -++� _c-- �_� . �i _ " _ _ " - LLJ _ � � f - 7- - � j - � W ��- - . �`-` W � i ' , Z ' , _ _ _ . . / �/ • -- I � `� � - taJ - i `"- .. Z �.; � � Z L�.� -' - � Z L - - ---- _ _ � Z � - - � - _i"} � t--._.L_ _ --� I .�. _ . — --=1-'- -- z' � - � e,. - ,c- -- ---� 1� ' _ , N ' N � ! � . � - . , ,, , . .z �; � � �? `��/ N _ - I ` i �/i . 'r w�f � O , �: Y.� . r � � � � �� . e �, - . �� - '� ~ �. � „ " � .J� I -�_�� . i ' AVENUE N•E• "•- . - - - . , �; �' � �; . -c Y �' , �.1 9 � M c+ ., r; e = � . � � . . = fC ; ,. � • � � : • �'' , - �� _ � ' � , .. '� � .... � � l.'.� � _ .. , � � lZ �• � ' � . � �� ' .. lf, � ..�- V M r - � , ';,' g9�TH VE ,N.E. • � =L z�: .�c � =4' '� � -- � ... ,.. � •• '�� _ , , � - � ~.� ' > r EC � • �G� I � �_= Y _, . • .� , i z 1� µ « Q �E , � i.{ �� z •�� . � ' , 1 �` � '� '_ �- - �� i,.f ,I ��,� a��, ,' ! �� . - �a '.y ° �' �" .� f I A .�91�� iG �9l � � _ r' _� �� ,�:w - a� ' I ,. ;s - _ �^ a �' � ; ; ,;; _ � r �. 4.,; � :i � , I � � �� J � ,y , � - v ' 6'.�,,I w� f , �6 'n •� r - 2 �'F ^ � / ' ; .�-i.� , z •j 5 �.�,y 5 � � ., o � o :> > , �ss �.� AVENUE , "` � � Z " .�..• T � Es. ��- lV �res... r + . ' 6 // �� r ^ � i /o �'� . I r � - ��;;� , ;� - � � � ,; ,,,- ,;n9 . R, . w o 1N� I � � �•= ' W ��e � '�2• .-.y: .;. ,w: � 3.,,. . ,�8� '= � • r � � � _ . � � _ .�. . �� 4 ,,,4 ,, � r, '° ' ' » o :i ��. 4 j '� - � � s i N'1'_ � �t �l � � t� ' � °' . � _ s � 1� o. a: _ 3J i � 5. . di< _ � �� ' • . . ' . .. ... _. . 6� �•« � •" AV E. -�� ` N. E.,,..:.; � . , -e � � � »; , y� ., � � i �' :� ` ;';�;; _ •� , •,, • , . _. Z 3 ¢.s �� 9 ,0,,,2, ��,4; , z ,o�.,l� 57TH PLACE �,., a ��_ �3 � �5�� ,�� , 380 �� Ul ��N, � ��; �� ' ;�ry �(n� �� ' .�,, �'I . .e a _��_ - .L_. �._ !_i � , t ' 19 PLACE ''` . ..., = � TH � � :i.. r,vr•y ,� � . � . --�, ' i � -�i"�l• a: � � � �. � � , � r t� ; ii �� i n) � ':r� X) j�� r) �� r, � ,., , ' ;�z1: o�Q . ,.., r, i '� ��,. ,±: 6 :> 2 3�I S. �. 9 �o ,% �"� SZ;� •�g Z 3� 5° ��;��,�o �� z! al i. `/ 2 3��t S �, ,�7�^° d��zi9 f9 /f ; ' tc e� �� , � � ' y.�" I � � m i . � _. ' - ' � : i � i .� � �9 y ..�.1 -�: .' . .. �1 1.., '""` / .. .� r �� S _ ,�� : �. _ ti - `� � -'�YE�'F�Er,,,� '� °' r—� r—_� (� 1'C T 3 I � I 23 N �oF m � �. h I � _ �--- W � Z � -. _� ,-. � - -� r - �� - � � 23 �� - _ _ UIYOF FRIDLEY FR[DLEY MUNIC[PAL CENTER • 6431 UNIVERSITY AVE. N.E. FR[DLEY, MN 55432 •(612) 571-3450 • FAX (612) 571-1287 August 23, 1994 Ms. Kathryn Hadley Commissioner � Minnesota Housing Finance Agency 400 Sibiey Street Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Commissioner Hadley: I am writing this letter in support of the Anoka County Community Action Program's (ACCAP) application for funds under the Transitional Housing Program. The proposal is to purchase a four unit apartment building at 380 - 57th Place in Fridley for use as transitional housing. The apartment building is located in City �ew Addition, just northeast of the University Avenue and 57th Avenue intersection. This was identified as a"primary focus" neighborhood in the City's comprehensive plan. Acquisition, rehabilitation and management by ACCAP of this structure is consistent with the goals stated in the City's comprehensive plan and housing program. Subject to the approval of the board members, the Fridley Housing and Redevelopment Authority wil( provide assistance equal to 50 percent of the rehabi(itation costs. One-ha(f of the assistance wiil take the form of a 30 year loan financed at a favorable interest rate. The other half of the assistance will also take the form of a loan that will not be repayable until the property is sold. We have enjoyed working with the Anoka County Community Action Program. ACCAP is an effective provider of housing and we look forward to working with them on this project as well. I strongiy encourage the award of grant funds to this project. Sincerely, �� William W. Burns City Manager/Executive Director of HRA rsc 10G �. CITY OF FRIDLEY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE r�IORANDUH To: Barb Dacy, Director of Community Development From: Leon Madsen, City Assessor Subject: ACCAP Hyde Park leased co-op proposal Date: August 11, 1994 • $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$S$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ State Statute 273.124, subd. 6 and 6a, are the applicable rules for taxation_ I must admit that I am not, 'at all, familier with these kinds of projects. As you indicated, Columbia Heights is in the process of dealing with one, and the County Assessor is, currendy, working on it. There are 2 major considerations in determining the tax on these: -What will the value be after the rehab work is completed? The County Assessors Office appraises these properties, so its basically up to them for value. My guess is that simple cosmetic improvements may not have much impact on value. The market rents, that will be established, may have some impact. -Will the project meet the very �complicated rules outlined in 273.124? I suppose that, ACCAP will be working with Dan Klint, Asst. Anoka _ County Attorney, in drawing up the co-op, so that it meets the homestead requirements. Therefore, attached are my calculations of a tax comparison: 10H � 0 Hyde Park Co -- op proposat � e��d�,g Current EMV EMVNnit Current Tax 6003 2nd St., 4—unrt $�'i,600 $23,900 $3,i'24 5916 2 1/2 St., 7—unit $121,200 $30,300 $4,721 5908 2 1�2 St., 7—unit $121,200 ''0,300 $4,721 v 'i oi s��,9 Est. Tax Est. City as HS Co—op Revenue Loss $1,095 $394 $i,388 $a00 $i,388 $.50� 1094 were homestead �alorem property �re; i lease; and the fact that the Is. more dwe(lings, owned by a cor- son who owns a y a dwelling, or '.aim homestead ntaining several ing occupied by tion or number, nder this subdi- �r more than 80 staining several tive units com- ivision, the cor- ;ht to occupy a iar�table corpo- npt thereunder ect to member �I participation 'Ired home park and each per- tled to occupy ead treatment 1 description or each home- 't were home- rem property ither directly, holly owned ssociation. no outstand- ) tax-exempt of the manu- ing them to ral dwelling s a nonprofit r which they cation must in the man- s. ral dweiling '` ' ter 80D and ith persons 1095 TAXFS; LISTING, ASSESSMEIV'f 273.124 who occupy a unit in the building and the residency agreement entitles the resident to occupancy in the building after personal assets are exhausted and regardless of ability to pay the monthly maintenance fee, homestead classification shall be given to each unit so occupied and the entire building shall be assessed in the manner provided in subdivi- sion 3 for cooperatives and charitable corporations. Subd. 6. Leasehold cooperatives. When one or more dwellings or one or more buildings which each contain several dwelling units is owned by a nonprofit corporation subject to the provisions of chapter 317A and qualifying under section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1990, or a limited partnership which corporation or partnership operates the property in conjunction with a cooperative association, and has received public financing, home- stead treatment may be claimed by the cooperative association on behalf of the mem- bers of the cooperative for each'dwelling unit occupied by a member of the cooperative. The cooperative association must provide the assessor with the social security numbers of those members. To qualify for the treatment provided by this subdivision, the fol- lowing conditions must be met: (a) the cooperative association must be organized under chapter 308A and all vot- ing members of the board of directors must be resident tenants of the cooperative and must be elected by the resident tenants of the cooperative; (b) the cooperative association must have a lease for occupancy of the property for a term of at least 20 years, which permits the cooperative association, while not in default on the lease, to participate materially in the management of the property, including material participation in establishing budgets, setting rent levels, and hiring and supervising a management agent; (c) to the extent permitted under state or federal law, the cooperative association must have a right under a written agreement with the owner to purchase the property if the owner proposes to seli it; if the cooperative association does not purchase the property it is offered for sale, the owner may not subsequently sell the property to another purchaser ai a price lower than the price at which it was offered for sale to the cooperative association unless the cooperative association approves the sale; (d) a minimum of 40 percent of the cooperative association's members must have incomes at or less than 60 percent of area median gross income as determined by the United States Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under section 142(d)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1991. For purposes of this clause, "member income" means the income of a member existing at the time the member acquires cooperative membership; (e) if a limited partnership owns the property, it must include as the managing gen- eral partner a nonprofit organization operating under the provisions of chapter 317A and qualifying under section 501(c)(3) or SQ1(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1990, and the limited partnership agreement must provide that the managing general partner have suf%cient powers so that it materi- ally participates in the management and control of the limited partnership; ( fl prior to becoming a member of a leasehold cooperative described in this subdi- vision, a person must have received notice that (1) describes leasehold cooperative property in plain language, including but not limited to the effects of classification under this subdivision on rents, property taxes and tax credits or refunds, and operating expenses, and (2) states that copies of the articles .of incorporation and bylaws of the cooperative association, the lease between the owner and the cooperative assqciation, a sample sublease between the cooperative association and a tenant, and, if the owner is a partnership, a copy of the limited partnership agreement, can be obtained upon written request at no charge from the owner, and the owner must send or deliver the materials.within seven days after receiving anyrequest; � . (g) if a dweliing unit of a building was occupied on the 60th day prior to the date on which the unit became leasehold cooperative propeRy described in this subdivision, the notice described in paragraph (� must have been sent by first class mail to the oocu- pant of the unit at least 60 days prior to the date on which the unit became leasehold 10J 273.124 TAXFS; LISTING, ASSESSMEIVT ��6 cooperative property. For purposes of the notice under this paragraph, the copies of the documents referred to in paragraph (� may be in proposed version, provided that any subsequent material alteration of those documents made after the occupant has requested a copy shall be disclosed to any occupant who has requested a copy of the document. Copies of the articles of incorporation and certificate of limited partnership shall be filed with the secretary of state after the expiration of the 60-day period unless the change to leasehotd cooperative status does not proceed; (1S) the county attorney of the county in which the property is located must certify to the assessor that the property meets the requirements of this subdivision; (i) the public financing received must be from at least one of the following sources: ( I) tax increment financing proceeds used for the acquisition or rehabilitation of the building or interest rate write-downs relating to the acquisition of the building; (2) government issued bonds exempt from taxes under section 103 of the Intemal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1991, the proceeds of which are used for the acquisition or rehabilitation of the building; (3) programs under section�221(d�3), 202, or 236, of Title II of the National Hous- ing Act; (4) rental housing program funds under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 or the market rate family graduated payment mortgage program funds administered by the Minnesota housing finance agency that are used for the acquisition or rehabilitation of the building; (5) low-income housing credii under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1991; (6) public financing provided by a local government used for the acquisition or rehabilitation of the building, inctuding grants or loans from (i) federal community development block grants; (ii) HOME block grants; or (iii) residential rental bonds issued under chapter 474A; or (7) other rental housing program funds provided by the Minnesota housing finance agency for the acquisition or rehabilitation of the building; (j) at the time of the initial request for homestead classification or of any transfer of ownership of the property, the governing body of the municipality in which the prop- eRy is located must hold a public hearing and make the following findings: (1) that the granting of the homestead treatment of the apartment's units will facil- itate safe, clean, affordable housing for the cooperative members that would otherwise not be available absent the homestead designation; (2) that the owner has presented information satisfactory to the goveming body showing that the savings garnered from the homestead designation of the units will be used to reduce tenant's rents or provide a level of furnishing or maintenance not possi- ble absent the designation; and (3) that the requirements of paragraphs (b), (d), and (i) have been met. Homestead treatment must be afforded to units occupied by members of the coop- erative association and the units must be assessed as provided in subdivision 3, pro- vided that any unit not so occupied shall be classified and assessed pursuant to the appropriate class. No more than three acres of land may, for assessment purposes, be inctuded with each dwelling unit that qualifies for homestead treatment under this sub- division. Subd. 7. Leased buildings or land. For purposes of class 1 determinations, home- steads include: (a) buildings and appurtenances owned and used by the occupant as a permanent residence which are located upon land ihe iitle to which is vested in a person or entity other than the occupant; (b) all buildings and appurtenances located upon land owned by the occupant and used for the purposes of a homestead together with the land upon which they are located, if all of the following criteria are met: 10K 1097 � _ � . Community Development Department PI.ANIVING DIVISION City of Fridley DATE: September 1, 1994 ��/ 1" TO: William Burns, City Manager � FROM: SUBJECT: Backqround Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator Steven Barg, Planning Assistant Appointing City Representative to the National Organization on Disability The National Organization on Disability (NOD) is a private, non- profit organization dedicated to promoting full participation of persons with disabilities in all aspects of community life. There is no cost to the City, and participation with NOD enables the City to receive NOD's quarterly newsletter, have instant access to information about Federal disability legislation, and obtain technical assistance regarding implementation of programs benefitting persons with disabilities. In January of 1992, the City Council appointed Mr. Roger Blohm to serve a two-year term as the City's representative to NOD. During his term, Mr. Blohm worked closely with the Human Resources Commission promoting an improved quality of life for the disabled, and keeping the Commission informed on issues pertaining to persons with disabilities. Mr. Blohm's term officially expired at the end of 1993; however, staff inadvertently did not bring this matter of reappointment to the City Council's attention. Subsequently, Mr. Blohm has continued to receive information from NOD and remained the City's liaison to this organization. Recently, Mr. Blohm indicated to staff that he wished to resign from this position effective immediately. Staff brought this matter to the Human Resources Commission at its August 11, 1994 meeting and the Commission approved a motion recommending that the City Council appoint Charles Welf as the City's new representative to NOD. Recommendation Staff recommends that Charles Welf be appointed to serve as the City's representative to NOD effective immediately. SB/dn M-94-495 FINANCE DEPARTME] CITY OF: FRIDLEY TO: FROM: SUB3ECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM . _ � ` , : T ' ; RICHARD D. PRIB`YL ' ` ` � FINANCE DIRECTOR WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR BIDS ON PERSONAL COMPUTERS September 2, 1994 Attached you will find the bid comparisons that we most recently received. As you recall, staff rebid the PC's because the computer manufacturers did nof comply with the stated specifications. What we discovered, as a result of the latest bids, was virtually the same as the last. This time we had four manufacturers submit bids; three of which had not complied with the specifications in one form or another. The only company that did comply with the specifications was Ameridata. This time they did bid the specified computer and the bid was within the budget. When we reviewed the bids of the non-complying companies we discovered that they are nat able to offer discount pricing on PC's that are based on the most recent standards. The discount pricing comes from the clone manufacturer's ability to assemble PC's built from parts that are most often not based on the newest technology; therefore, they are able to pick up components at deep discounts. After reviewing our options, as to what action we might take, we are recommending to Council to receive the bids, and after receiving them, reject all bids. We are requesting as a follow up action that Council allow staff to purchase 11 PC's off of the State Contact which is identical to the Ameridata bid. These PC's would be for the users identified ,as multi-system or high capacity users. We would then reduce the specifications for the remaining 11 PC's to take advantage of the price breaks available from the clone manufacturers. By doing this we would be reducing the overall cost of the acquisition and have some budget capacity left over for training on various windaws based software. Since the pricin� on the cloned PC's would be under $25,000, Council would not have to receive the bids and make the award. Staff is asking for administrative approval to advertise new specs for the remaining 11 PC's and make an administrative award when they are received. This would speed up the purchasing process by approximately two to three weeks. RDP/me Attachment 12 Ameridata *Computer *PC *Blue Parts Tailors Star SYSTEM UNIT 21 39 837.00 27 941.55 29 421.00 40 719.00 DISPLAYS 21 11 781,00 8 090.25 8 442.40 KEYBOARDS 21 871.20 440.00 MICE 21 986.70 594.OQ TAPE DRIVES 21 4 202.00 3 263.70 3 498.00 POWER LINE PROTECTI4N 21 518.54 132.00 SOFTWARE 21 1 166.00 2 310.40 TOTAL 55 820.00 42 837.94 44 837.00 40 719.00 GIS SYSTEM UNIT 1 3 269.00 1 744.55 1 748.00 2 394.00 GIS DISPLAY 1 972.00 723.35 732.00 TOTAL 4 241.00 2 467.90 2 480.00 2 394.00 Deliver /Installation 1 430.00 475.00 440.00 Hardware Maintenance 5 ear on-site i2 958.00 22 440.00 1 f00.00 2 875.00 Documentation Confi uration 190.00 79.00 TOTAL 14 578.00 22 915.00 1 619.00 2 875.00 GRAND TOTAL 74 639.00 68 220.84 48 936.00 45 988.00 *Does not meet bid specifications 12A MEMORANDUM : ` FINANCE DEPARTMENT RICHA: CITY OF FRIDLEY ' ; c�r�r FrNalvcE TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: � WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER � RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR USE OF CREDIT CARDS September 1, 1994 T :DDT72VT In following with the Council's continuing commitment to customer service, I am providing the attached resolution. This simple resolution provides an additional convenience for residents and other customers desiring to pay for services through the use of credit cards. We will be installing the appropriate equipment within the ne�ct two weeks which will enable us to take both VISA and MASTERCARD. It appears the equipment and the process should be in place by October 1, for over the counter payments using this form of tender. RDP/me Attachment 13 RESOLUTION NO. - 1994 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE USE OF CREDIT CARDS AS A METHOD OF PAYMENT FOR CITY SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Fridley is committed to providing the highest quality customer service, and WHEREAS, the City has identified that the payment types for the services provided is somewhat limited, and WHEREAS, the use of credit cards provides an additional convenience to the residents purchasing services, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Fridley will provide as an additional convenience to its residents, the ability to use both VISA and MASTERCARD as additional ways to pay for City services. � PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS DAY OF , 1994. ATTEST: WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK 13A ME MORAND M TO: Wiiliam W. Bums, City Manager ��•�� PW94294 FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director Scott Erickson, Assistant Public Works Director�l�, DATE: September 6, 1994 SUBJECT: Water Senrice Installation Request - Murphy Warehouse and Burlington Northern Petitions have been received from Murphy Warehouse Company and Buriington Northem Leasing Corporation requesting the City install water services to their respective properties on Main Street. The petitions request the City install the improvement and waive the requirement for a public hearing. The cost of the installation will be assessed to their abutting property. The installation of the water services can be incorporated into the contract for the reconstruction of Main Street. Recommend Council receive the petitions and waive the public hearing for Murphy Warehouse Company and Burlington Northern Leasing Corporation requesting the City to install water services to their respective properties. SE/JGF:cz Attachments 14 ,� . �.. ; �a � z U � Y o� '✓•LYhG: C` �-� _ � � _. �� ^� � ;�, � a: � � � ,� �1 � '� (� . �ut. 1 I :" , �� C/�1. \ 1 I �.)�.": \ � . �., ; , , , �� , .�. .��/� , �' �� . v ' ' i � / �,. ��°1 �` �,., � i � . � � � c.�. , i , � - L/ -----` ,� . ,JQ� � � b �� : i -sso --.,. V n:s. � i � i; _ .' �— ..,': �.: � � •. � � � � � , :«�:. .� ' � ._.. . -- � � + � a • , .._.:. � ..... � � `. � � =\ ::...,; i•_._._ c• � il �- � _ , � _ .. .�. � _ : J � � � i �� If N - � . --�- , , �� '1_;`�� -� � ' � � - ' ' � ` �' ' — �=%� � �� ' .� n rl ,� ` ;�' � � �--- -- r.r� �� . �' ,; j � i i �v/;�' .��^�i',ji " Ii � � � ;��c �I � 1 �� . �:--�;` � �.�:li I;, . �� I � , , .� _� �—� r�,� ` , .... j � ........ .:� ►;, �-----1 i. '! Burlington Northern �� -� �� : � �---- �� Z: , .9�� i. � �- � �i � �� ` ^(~ �� 1�\\`\ f 1 � I_ , i� I , r� � ' � � '��,� . �, � 1, -�� ,: i_ � � . � ,,.,:.. �,.,, : , � ; � �� , , �- u ; , � - __ , .-- -,..:� Murph Warehouse 1� t� �� Y ; i. � ��-- / V ' � _._ � / � �.. '1 � �n IJ D a �t W 'L z � :�:"�•� �`�\�- 1 ' �;. u . v1 � ` I J <� ` `'•.:; ��\ i � f� ,,`(�.r` \ � � \J ��- �' �' ``,�\\ � J •, • I ' i� ., ' ��.� .�\ �Y _ � - ,�:\�.\ \ : �: � . ,` `\1 , , _ . � '., \1 � - '' � � � �, � �� ' � �� - � ��' �, ; �.` , ��JL��_ �'` �°•-'� il �j,{ � ,��, .J �. '� i ` �� t• ��,1' �J 1 �* •}3 n J ' �. �1 `}.� '^� � � � � ( - � �, �1 / a ., - ! � t �� ,� � n : I : ; �, � � �ti � ��'� ••� � � �' �, � ; � ;`' I I� f i I��' l �' _ . � �I�J� , � � � 14A � ; i: , � I ��: L�I u� � r ;�_; ; ��R i I ; � i , - � � _�i � ; -- --� r-;,-- —�i �: .I�� i I ;I ` . . _- - �- -" . _ : �a,'__'_- _ _ _ =1 �. �: , . , . ...,i __ � �—��---'----�� i � j �,_. � ��_ U� �'� ?. i`�'�`� i�� . .... � . � �I, _ ,; ; � _ ;; (- ! � I = �STREET IND�?' � � .. . . �;�:.• ..:. - ,.... .. s:. ra: - .. �- :.Yicon h:c. t:: �- _..-_.:.'-'- � I_�I` � Wwn Otivc NC �� t ^�c[ Avc. 78i f-' ¢�kcr sc. �s: �rrnilcr G . �-' [i kC[ Sc... td: �-` fSxllcc Dlvd. ta: C" nc�ty� sc. rp: u-`' Ird;.�irc �:,y �'. «1 I�nj.�ain .`,l. h?: `'.� . Urn 1+i� c M ivc h.. �- j < << •� • . �, �� . ., .. r . _ . i .. i . . . .• , � . r��. . . i . . . . I i:�`..., .�., . . , ,�,_____ n�i � BURUNGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD � Marketing & Property Services 4105 Lexington Avenue North Suite 200 Arden Hiils, MN 55126 Tel. 612-490-6160 Fax 612-490-6167 August 1, 1994 Mr. Scott Eriekson Assistant Public Works Director City of Fridley Fridley Municipa! Center 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 llear Mr. Erickson: As requested in your July 27 letter, attached is our petition reqUesting the installation of a 12 inch ductile water service line to be stubbed on railroad property at Main Street NE and 49th Avenue NE in Fridley. The railroad holds the subject land under the name of BN Leasing Corporation. Piease let me know if anything further is required to complete this installation. ' c y, Bruce E. Opp Manager, Property Ser . • CITY OF FRIDLEY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the City of Fridley, Mayor and Council for" the instaliation of the foilowing improvements: A 12 inch ductile water service line to be stubbed at BN Leasing Corporation's property located along Main Street NE in Fridley, Minnesota, at its intersection with 49th Avenue NE. Said improvement is proposed as a water line connection for future land development purposes� We further waive ti�e requirements fo� a public hearing on this improvement and �equest that the cost of these improvements be assessed directly to the abutting properties over a 10-year period. NAME BN LEASING CORPORATION n__ / .�i1A X'�� ADDRESS 4105 Lexington Avenue N., Suite 200 Arden Hills, MN 55126 .�� y v Title LLy),�/�i / 1^o�O+P�r'��t.nd��rr��r�t 14C CITY OF FRIDLEl' IMPROVEMENT PROJECT We, the undersigned, do hereby petition the City of Fridley, Mayor and Council for the , installation of the following improvements: Bike Path Storm Sewer and Water Connections Grading Resurface Concrete Curb and Gutter We further waive the requirements for a public hearing on this improvement and request that the cost of these improvements be assessed directly to the abutting properties over a 10-year period. NAME Murphy Warehouse Company � - . � By: L��G Title: Cha i rman/ CEO Date: Auqust 18, 1994 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) � SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ADDRESS 701 24th Avenue S.E. Minneapolis, MN 55414 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this da�� ot , 1994, by . " _ ; . . , the - _of Murphy Warzhouse Company, a corporation under the laws of thz State of Minnesota on behalf of the Corporation. � ��_ L �-'L ! (^ J �C. � l� C, �� Notary Public � � � — - i LAURtE blUF�PMf NOTARY PUBLIC—MlNt�50TA RAAISEY CpUl�(TY ��°"�'"�°"'� 14D TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: En9mccr;n9 Sewet Y:ale� P�+iks S��eets hfairUenancc ME MORANDUM r �iliam W. Bums, City Manager �` �1 � � John G. Flora, �Public Works Director September 6, 1994 Change Order No. 1 to Well No. 1, Project No. 269 PW94297 In June we initiated an emergency repair project for the removal of sand from Well No. 1. In the past 1 S months we had the well turbines failed three times as a result of sand deterioration of the turbine vanes. As we are looking at the summer demand period, we initiated an emergency project to remove the accumulation of sand in Well No. 1. The contract was awarded to Keys Weil Driiling and was expected that the cost would be under $25,000 and approximately 30 to 40 cubic yards of sand wouid be removed. As this was an emergency project based upon the expected summer demand, we continued to remove sand from the well for an excess of 150 cubic yards and 182 hours of effort. As a resuit of the work completed, request the Council approve Change Order No. 1 to Emergency Repair of Well No. 1 Project No. 269 for a totaf cost of $38,100. JGF:cz 15 � ., .. �.. , MEMORANDUM Zb: John Flora, Director of Public Works �: Paul I�wrence, Superintendent of Public Works DATE: August 30, 1994 SUBJEGT: Well #1 On June 24, 1994, the City contracted with Keys Well Drilling Co. to do eme�ency repairs to Well #1 to correct sand problems that had caused the failure of three well turbines in the last 18 months. Keys Well Drilling had estimated that the necessary work could be completed for less than $24,000 using information gained fram similar work done in the past. Keys estimated that it wouZd be necessary to remove 30 or 40 cubic yards of sand in an estimated 60 hours of piunpirig. The actual amount of material removed exczeded 150 cubic yards and consequently increased the actual removal time to 182 hours causing the total cost of the work to exceed the budget estimate by $19,100 for a total cost of $38,100. Keys Well Drillim� worked in a diligent m�nner to keep the total cost to the City for this wozk as small as possible. 15A Cnq�neer�ne� �n Sewcr � oe Yv,t�+r � � O F'a�k5 O � Strects VU M:f+nten�ncc W -� � � 0 ' � ' Ii'�I� MOR.1�N�il1Ul��[ TO: William ',�:'. Bums, City Manager PW94-192 FROM: John G. =1ora, Public Works Director DATE: June 10. � 994 SUBJECT: Well No. i Repair As mentioned earlier, Weil No. 1 has not been operating because of the sand we are pumping. in the past 4 years, we have replaced the pump and bowls on this well because of the wear caused by the sand in the weli. We have had our consuitant, Maier Stewart & Associates (MSA), review the records and it appears that redeveloping the weii through an air process should return it to its original productivity and also remove the sand contamination that we are currently experiencing. We received quotes from two firms: Traut Wells and Keyes Wells. White Keys is approximately $3,000 more, they are available for starting the project immediately. Our concern is that Well No. 1 is necessary to support our summer demands since we are minimizing the production from Welt No's 6, 7, 6 and 9. We propose to award the cont�act to Keys Well Drilling to air devefop Well No. 1. I expect the total project, including Ning the well for our records, to be less then $25,000. JGF:cz I� 15B �a S�� Eng�^cennn Sewer V.'a1Cr P�nk; :��r(;f.(S rv e�nten.�nc�. ME MORANDUM TO: William W. Bums, City Manager,��' � PW94296 , FROM: John G. Flora, �ublic Works Director Scott Erickson, Assistant Public Works Director�� Jack Kirk, Park & Recreation Director �� DATE: September 6, 1994 SUBJECT: Commons Park Shelter (Project No. 26� - Change Order No. 1 Additional work is required regarding the Commons Park shelter construction. The alignment of the shelter was adjusted in order to miss existing trees on the site. The realignment moved the sheiter location 26 feet to the east, resuiting in 26 additional feet of water and sewer service to be installed. The cost for the additional service installation is $419. The original contract had a unit cost for a restroom hand dryer of $400 each. Only one hand dryer was included in the original contract. A second hand dryer will need to be installed at a cost of $400. The shelter has four (4) exterior doors to the outside. It is recommended to upgrade the doors to a heavier gage door and frame to increase durability to weather and possible vandalism. The cost of the upgrade is $125/door for a total cost of $500. The contract was originally for $103,919. The budgeted amount for this contract is $120,000. It is recommended that Council approve Change Order No. 1 of the Commons Park Shelter Project No. 267 in the amount of $1,319. SE/JGF: cz �s � , .. �.. , . .L 5 YEAA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BUDGET 1994 City of Fridley State of Minnesota • . , Pari� Ca ital Im rovements 1994 �.� Beginning Balance Revenues 41.752 Irtterest Income Park Corrtributions Currerd Ad Valorem Homest�d and Agricufture Credit Aid Total Revenues Funds Available Pro ects Ending Balance Beginning Balance Revenues Funds Available Proiects Ending Balance Playground Equipmerrt Upgrades Tennis Court Resu►iacing Commons Park Activiry Building New Project ADA Park improvemerrt Total Projects 1995 Irrterest Income Park Corrtributions CurreM Ad Va{orem Homestead and AgricuRure Credit Aid Total Revenues Commons Park Press Box Court Resurfacing New Project � ADA Park Improvemerrt Tennis Court Over{ays Total ?rojects 10,000 85,550 15,000 152,30� 987,340 35,000 24,000 ..,� 120,000 15,000 194,000 5793.340 � � l`_� � � .� � 5793,340 39,667 � 10,000 85,550 � 15,000 150,217 � 943�557 15,000 � 12,000 �, 15,000 � 56,000 98,000 � �845 557_ � � Y Zoa6A �1 Engineerin9 Sewer YJ;�ter F' �+ r M. � Jt�CCI> ff�lfl:l'f1:7f'..C�t: ME MURANDUM TO: Wiliiam W. Burns, City Manager � PW94279 .r � FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director DATE: August 16, 1994 SUBJECT: Posting of "No Tums on Red° on Highway 65 � At the City Council meeting of August 15, 1994, Council expressed concern regarding the amount of traffic turning on County Road 35 (Central Avenue) which severely impacts the neighborhood access to the trunk highway system. Accordingly, the Mayor indicated that the intersection of Highway 65 and Central Avenue should be designated "no tums on red." Attached is a resolution to be submitted to the Minnesota Department of Transportation requesting that signs be posted on the intersection of Highway 65 and Central Avenue to prevent all tums on red. JGF: rsc 17 ,� . �.. ; RE80LZfFIdTT 1+�. - 1994 •I;r� • / •; •l:r�� :r� ■ Y:1' ' �� •l' • � '/ �� •I •��i� Y:1" � �+•._�:. •; • - :� r.:r r i� •� U •.�r• � �,5, there is a fair aa�uit of traffic o� Oaunty State Aid Hic�way No. 35, (CSAH 35) and �,8, the easterly neighborhoal servioed by Hathaway Iane has exits on to c�H 35 north of Highway 65, and �,8, the intersection of Highway 65 and C;SA�i 35 has restrictive turning movements during the period of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. arxi 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., and W�AB, during the remairyder of the day, right turnirig traffic on CSAH 35 imp�acts the exiting of Hathaway Iane, and, 1�,8, Hathaway Lane pravides ac�cess to the highway tnmk syste2n for a lan�e Iieighborhood, - la7W, �, 8'� IT RE80LVID TI�iT, the City Cbuncil of the City of Fridley, Anoka C7a�zty. Minnesota, requests that the Minnesota Depart�nent of Transportation post the intersection of Highway 65 and CSAii 35 with "No Turns on Red" signs for the northbow�d traffic. PASSED ArID ADOPl� BY Tf� CITY OOUNCIL OF TI� CITY OF FRIDLEY T�IIS DAY OF , 1994. f•�4�=�� WILLIAM A. C'FIAMPA - CI'i'Y CLEE2K WILi�M J. NEE - N�YOR 17A �� " tt�` :� 'e' • �� FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL �� September 6, 1994 Type of License: B�r�. CIGARETTE Mercantile Market M. Albakri 6304 Hwy 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT Mercantile Market M.�Albakri 6304 Hwy 65 N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 REFUSE HAULER Keith Krupenary & Son Keith Krupenary Disposal Service Inc. 1214 Hall Ave. St. Paul , MP� 55118 TREE REMOVAL Miller Tree & Stump Removal 11375 Lexington Ave. Blaine, MN 55449 Tony Miller Approved By: David Sallman Public Safety Director LICENSES Paul Lawrence Public Works Superintendent Fees: $12.00 $35.00 $60.00 $60.00 i � � FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ��GT$�CAL Atpha & Omega Electric Inc 12705 Eveleth Path Apple Valley Mn 55124 Richard Otley Electric 1040 Gazdena Ave NE Fridley MN 55432 C,�AS S�RVI� East Bethel Heating & AC 16525 Hwy 65 NE Ham Lake Ml�i 55304 Kath Heating & AC 3096 Rice St Little Canada MN 55113 Wayne Bezanson Richard Otley Peter Chouinard Bruce Kath C�FNERAL CONTRACTOR-COMMERCIAL Donald Findell 6850 Siverts Ln Fridley MN 55432 Donald Findell Nelson Brothers Gonstruction Inc 1216 Selby Ave St Paul MN 55104 Sampson-Lindgren 2228 E 35 St Minneapolis MN 5540'T- Hubert Nelson Dallas Tildahl (�ENERAI GONTRACTQR-RE�IDENTIAL Advance Companies Inc (4423) 6401 Central Ave NE Fridley AvtN 55432 Iarry �'rapp All Systems Roofing Inc (8963) 2325 Endicott St St Paul MN 55114 Tom Edwards 21A LICENSES STATE OF MINN Same JOHN PALACIO Chief Bldg Ofcl Same JOHN P,ALACIO Chief Bldg Ofci Same Same STATE OF MINN Same � D& D Robertson Const Inc ('7799) 1102 Pike Lake Cir New Brighton MN 55112 Panelcraft (2179) 31 IS Saelling Ave S Minneapolis MN 55406-1995 Sampson-Lindgren(3129) 2228 E 35 St Minneapolis MN 55407- Sather D M Co Inc (3778} 7920 Powell Rd Hopkins MN 55345 Wren Builders Inc(4360) 9218 11 Ave S Bloomingtfln MN 55420 �[EATING East Bethel Heating & AC 16525 Hwy 65 NE Ham Lake MN 55304 Kath Heating & AC 3096 Rice St Little Canada MN 55113 Knott Mechanical Services Co 5941 142 Ave NW Ramsey MN 55303 LeVahn Bros Inc 3200 Penn Ave N Minneapolis MN 5541 Z Rapid Heating & AC 8714 E Research Center Rd New Hope MN 55428 Dale Robertson Gary Robideau Dallas Tildahl Kevin K:artark Harold Wren Peter Ghouinard Bruce Kath Ron Knott Loren LeVahn Duane Biddle 21B ' Same Same Same Same Same JOHN PALACIO Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same Same Same PLUMBING Galaxy Mechanical Contr Inc 3151 101 Ave NE Blaine MN 55449 NS/I Plumbing Inc 791 Hampden Ave 5t Paul MN 55114 Walsh C Plumbing 19909 Polk St NE Cedar MN 55011 SIGN ERECTOR Crosstown Sign 10166 Central Ave NE Minneapolis MN 55434 Moore Sign & Letter Inc 7801 Park Dr Chanhassen MN 55317 Signcrafters 7775 Mai.n St NE Fridley MN 55432 Warren Zimmerman William Bohn Chuck Walsh Rick Fox Randy Herman Pat Lawrance 21C STATE OF MINN Same Same JOHN PALACIO Chief Bldg Ofcl Same Same � � �� FRIdLEY Newquist & Ekstrum 301 Fridley Plaza Office Building 6401 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, MN 55432 . ESTIMA►TES SEPTEMBER 6, i994 Statement for Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attorney for the Month of June, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,972.50 Statement for Services Rendered as City Prosecuting Attorney for the Month of July, 1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 14,400.00 ASTECH P.O. Box i 025 St. Cloud, MN 56302 Street Improvement Project (Sealcoat) Project No. ST. 1994 - 10 FINAL ESTIMATE: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 159,488.25 Bituminous Consulting & Contracting 2456 Main Street N.E. Blaine, MN 55449 Concrete Street Repair - Kerry Lane Project No. ST. 1994 - 12 FINAL ESTIMATE: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 12,009.00 22 � � rn,r oF FRiOLEY NewMech Companies, Inc. 1633 Eustis Street St. Paul, MN 55108 ESTIMATES SEPTEMBER 6, i994 Locke Park Water Filter Plant Project No. 240 Estimate No. 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29,400.00 Karlen Construction 901 - 125th Avenue N.E. Blaine, MN 55434 Commons Park She{ter Project No. 267 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29,821.45 W.B. Miller, Inc. 6701 Norris Lake Road N.W. Elk River, MN 55330 Street Reconstruction - Stinson Boulevard Project No. ST. 1993 - 7 Estimate No. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 86,491.13 Progressive Contractors, Inc. 8736 Zachary Lane Osseo, MN 55369 Concrete Street Repair - North & South Innsbruck Project No. 1994 - 7 Estimate No. 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109,385.38 ._------• CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 6431 University Avenue N.E. . Fridley, Minnesota 55432 September 6, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley c/o �Iliam W. Burns, City Manager 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridiey, MN 55432 Council Members: CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby subrr?it the Final Estimate for Street lmprovement Project (Sea{coat) Project No. ST. 199410, for ASTECH Corporation, P O Box 1025, St. Cloud, MN 56302. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Street Improvement Project (Sealcoat) Project No. ST. 199410 and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorable Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on August 31, 1994. Respectfully submitted, j,.% , � �.---�'�� .�- John G. Flora Director of Public Works JT: cz Prepared by Checked by � September 6, 1994 City of Fridley STREET IMPRO�/EMENT PROJECT (SEALCOA� PROJECT NO. ST. 199410 CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually furnished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the plans and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is �159,488.25 and the final payment of $159,488.25 for the improvement project would cover in f�ll, the contractor's claims against the City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this project. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. ASTECH CORPORATION �-� � ,�� 22C � September 6, 1994 City of Fridley STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (SEALCOA� PROJECT NO. ST. 1994-10 PREVAIL(NG WAGE VERIFICATION This is to certify that ASTECH Corporation has abided by the Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. ASTECH CORPORATION � � c� ��-�(..2E:�C� : 22D � � September 6, 1994 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (SEALCOA� PROJECT NO. ST. 199410 We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantially complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the project. All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Also, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor. So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspection that being August 31, 1994. �, _ Jon on, Constructi Inspector ' � � . - � c.� � , i Contractor Representative, (Title) 22E FROM: City of Fridley Engineering Division TO: Honorabie Mayor and City Council City of Fridiey ° 6431 University Ave� NE Fridley� MPL 55432 Dated: September 6� 1994 CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. FRIDLEY� MINNESOTA 55432 RE: Estimate No. 1 (FINAL) Period Ending: August 31, 1994 FOR: ASTECH P O Box 1025 St. Cloud� MN 56302 JOB CODE NO. STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (SEALCOAT) PROJECT NO. ST. 1994 — 10 City: 408-00-067-415-4530-9402 $119,616.19 MSaS: 408-00-06-415-4530-9403 $39.872.06 STATEMENT OF WORK A. Seaicoat with FA-3 (0.27 gal/sq yd of emulsion and 21 Ib/sq yd of crushed granite aggregate) B. Sealcoat with FA-3 (0.27 gal/sq yd of emulsion and 23 Ib/sq yd of crushed granite aggregate) C. Seaicoat with Fridley Aggregate (0.32 gal/sq yd of emulsion and 27 Ib/sq yd of crushed granite aggregate) D. Sweep Before Sealcoat Appiied E. Sweep After Sealcoat Application F. 30 in. x 30 in. "loose Rock" signs G. Deduct for Clearing Catch Basin @ Lake Pointe H. Deduct for Fridiey Aggregate not Meeting Spec 22F 85,898 172,692 23,810 282,400 282,400 62 0.4688 SY 0.4883 SY 0.7449 SY 0.0160 SY 0.0440 SY 20.0000 Each 40,268.98 84, 325.50 17,736.07 4,518.40 12,425.60 1,240.00 (526.30 (500.00 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE $159,488.25 ,oTECH ESTIMATE NO. 1 (FINAL) SUMMARY: Original Contract Amount Contract additions C.O.# 1 Contract deductions — Revised contract amount Value Completed To Date Amount Retained (0%) Less Amount Paid Previousiy AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR $191,358.04 191,358.04 159,488.25 0.00 $159,488.25 PAGE 2 I hereby certify that the wark performed and the materials supplied to date unde� the terms of the contract for this project, and all authorized changes thereto� have an actual value under the contract of the amounts shown on this estimate (and the final quantities on the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and`�ect and no part of the "Amount Due This Estimate" has been received. By �> C� i!�� lil-Li/I-t� • , Contractor's Authorized Representative (Title) CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER I hereby certify that I have prepared or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment of this estimate under the contract for reference project. CITY OF FRIDLEY, INSPEC�,T.'OR Date: [) 3v 7T� By � v Chec ed By 22G Respectfully submitted, % / � L� �--2� ��ohn G. Flora, PE � Director of Pubiic Works CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridley, Minnesota 55432 September 6, 1994 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Fridley % �I(iam W. Burns, City Manager 6431 University Avenue N.E. Fridiey, MN 55432 Council Members: CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER We hereby submit the Final Estimate for Concrete Street Repair - Kerry Lane project No. ST. 1994 - 12, for Bituminous Consulting and Contracting, Inc., 2456 Main St NE, Blaine, MN 55449. We have viewed the work under contract for the construction of Concrete 5treet Repair Project No.ST. 1994 - 12 and find that the same is substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents. I recommend that final payment be made upon acceptance of the work by your Honorabfe Body and that the one year contractual maintenance bond commence on August 3�, 1994. Respectfully submitted, . .�� z�___-� ohn G. Flora Director of Public Works JT:cz Prepared b • Checked by:�:��-�� 22H September 6, 1994 City of Fridley CONCRETE STREET REPAIR - KERRY LANE PROJECT NO. ST. 1994 - 12 CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR This is to certify that items of the work shown in the statement of work certified herein have been actually fumished and done for the above-mentioned projects in accordance with the pians and specifications heretofore approved. The final contract cost is $46,360 and the final payment of $12,009 for the improvement project wouid cover in full, the contractor's ciaims against the City for all labor, materials and other work down by the contractor under this project. i declare under the penalties of peryury that this statement is just and correct. BITUMINOUS CONSUI.TING & CONTRACTfNC CO., ;1NC. Hi ary Mayers, Superintendent 22� September 6, 1994 To: Public Works Director City of Fridley REPORT ON FINAL INSPECTION FOR CITY OF FRIDLEY CONCRETE STREET REPAIR - KERRY LANE PROJECT NO. ST. 1994 - 12 We, the undersigned, have inspected the above-mentioned project and find that the work required by the contract is substantia!!y complete in conformity with the plans and specifications of the project. All deficiencies have been corrected by the contractor. Aiso, the work for which the City feels the contractor should receive a reduced price has been agreed upon by the contractor. So, therefore, we recommend to you that the City approve the attached FINAL ESTIMATE for the contractor and the one-year maintenance bond, starting from the day of the final inspection that being AucLUSt 31. 1994. � �; � Jon Tho�t�,�onstruction In�pector Contractor Representative, (Title) 22J September 6, 1994 City of Fridley CONCRETE STREET REPAIR - KERRY LANE PROJECT NO. ST. 1994 - 12 PREVAILlNG WAGE VERIFICATiON This is to certify that Bituminous Consulting & Contracting Company, Inc. has abided by the Prevailing Wage Provisions as specified by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry for Anoka County. I declare under the penalties of perjury that this statement is just and correct. BITUMINOUS CONSULTING & CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC. �� Hifiary Mayer , Superintendent 22K CITY OF FRIDLEY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6431 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N,E. FRIDLEY� MINNESOTA 55432 I FROM: City of Fridley Engineering Division TO: Honorabie Mayor and City Counci! City of Fridiey 6431 University Ave� NE Fridley, MN 55432 Dated: September 6. 1994 RE: Estimate No. 2 (FINAL) Period Ending: August S1. 1994 FOR: Bituminous Consufting d� Contracting Co !nc 2456 Main Street NE Blaine MN 55449 JOB CODE NO. 408-00-00-415-4530-9413 CONCRETE STREET REPAIR - KERRY LANE PROJECT NO. ST. 1994 - 12 STATEMENT �F W�RK ::>;>::;:::>:::<:»::::>:::>::>::>:<:>::>::::>:� :>:::::>::<:::>:»::»::»:<::<_»>::»::>::<:>:<:;>;:>:<:>::>:<;:::>::»::::; :::<:>:>:<::::»::;:>::;>::»:::::>::::>::>::::»;<:::::;:<:::»>::>:�:»:::;:>::;::>::>::>_»>::>::»»>::>: _::..:;..:>ua::»�: <:>:;>: >::<:::;;::; '_.>:>ta�� ::>�<:`::;;::::::«::::=<�:;:::<;>«::>:::: :>:;::>:�:::�:<::::::::�;::�:::::::::>::;:<:><::: :...................................................................................... ............................... ................................ ................ <:<::::>::>;:::::::<.::>:;;::<:<:><;::»::::::>::::>::::>::::::>::_>_:<:::>::>::::<>::>::::>::::::>::>::::::::::::>::>:::::<:>::<::»::.::>::»:;:>::::>::»:::<:>::>::::>::::»::::::::::::>:>::>:::;;>::<;:;:::::<::::::::::::>::>::::::>::::::>::::>::>«:::::..� � _........Ta i ...................... � .:: .:::..:..:::::::::::::.�:::: :.::::.�::.�:::� :::::::: .:: -.::::::::::::::::::::::::::. .;..:E�:>::: - : �:>�> si�m�� :«ii;:..: ::<::;:;<;><:'��`�::>:>;:>:�:;:::...:::>:::::::::;<::�<::::::;:_�;:;;: :;_:>��::;>::: `::":;::>: ;>::;>�:;_ >:;<;�;:;;;:::::<:::::::::..;;.;::;.; ::<::::,;.�::.::::;:�:;�:�>:r:.,: , .................. ... . ...:.:............. ................................::.::::... ::::::::.:..:.:::.:..:.: ::...:.....:........_:...... . . .. .. . .... .......... .. .....::...:.:::::::::::.::..�.::.:�.:.:.,.:;: ;;.::,:::::.;:.::.:_;;:;;::::::.:::<..::::.r :.:::.:::::::::::::::::.::::::.: :..::.::;:::::::::::::. >.::.::;: _>;>;:;:.:<:;::::.:<:>:;::>::::>�:::< ::::::::::: :::::<:::«::::�.:.....:.......... ...... . . ... ................ ... . ,..:;;:<::::;<; �::;:,:: �:;<.<>:�<� ;:.::,::.: : ; .::..: .: : ....... .:, ::::::::.::::::::.:�::.;...:::.:::.::::::.�.::�.;::.;�<:...::::.::............:::::::::.::;:.:;.: .....U��t:......... . ......... ...... �h�s ..... .:..: Th�s. . ... .. ..'� . :.;.. . . .:.:..:::::.:. .:::.;:.;;;::;::,:::.::.::<.:::::::::.� ::::: :.::.::.::.;.;:::.:-.;�:..:::.�: :.:::: :.:::.;�:.::,;.:. ... ..... .ota�.. .. :.>:=::;::'i'..;.. :. ............. ........... ....... ..... ......................::.�:::::.... ..::.:..::.::::::::::::::..... ..... ...... ::>`� `ONTRA �.> :::.:.:::.::.:<:»:::<->.. _::>'�:<::';'>::`:?:>::;��:<::::::: ::�::<:' ��>::::::::::..;::::;.::::;:<:><`: �::::>;::=>::>��::":;:>_:::::::<:;::<�»::::>::::>::>�::.`::.':::`::::�` ::::::"'";::::::<.>::::::::« ::::;::..;; :..:.�=<:;<::::>:;:::::<�:::::<:::;.::�:::;-:::`:.`":';:::::;:;:-:'::::::`}}: .:;::::::>:::::<:::::,:::::::::;;':<_>...<;: `�:<:.� .. I. :._ :::>:;::: . >::.::; :. .>:;:>::;:>::»>;> �::: :<:>:<::<>:::::«::� ...............:.:.:.....GT:..TEM:..:::::,.::::::::::::::::.::Quant. ;::...::;::.:.:Pnc�::::::::...::.iJnit...::Est�mate-.::.:Esticnate:.:...Qvaa :.::.�..1.�mou��.::::: .. ...................................._.. ... ......_ ....._ _... ._. ..........__..._ ........ ..... .............. .. ......... ..... ............... Remove Conc�ete Pavemerrt 1,350.00 5.00 SY 0.00 0.00 1.350.00 6,750.00 Common Excavation 200.00 11.00 CY 0.00 0.00 250.00 2,750.00 Mill Bituminous Surface 40.00 3.00 SY 0.00 0.00 40.00 120.00 Type 41A Wearing Course Mixture 150.00 36.50 Ton 100.00 3,650.00 100.00 3,650.00 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat 100.00 t.00 Gal 90.00 90.00 90.00 90.00 Type 31 Binder (includes oi� 210.00 34.50 Ton 0.00 0.00 210.00 7,245.00 ', Ctass 5 Aggregate Base 500.00 10.50 Ton 31.00 325.50 523.00 5,491.50 � Topsoi! Borraw 80.00 7.50 CY 0.00 0.00 40.00 300.00 Geobextile Fabric 1,100.00 1.10 SY 0.00 0.00 '' Construct 8ituminous Driveway 200.00 9.00 SY 100.00 900.00 100.00 900.00 i Construct Bituminous D/W (Private) 600.00 9.00 SY 483.00 4,347.00 483.00 4,347.00 Coristruct Concrete Driveway 50.00 24.00 SY 26.00 624.00 26.00 624.00 Construct Concrete D/VN (P�ivate) 200.00 24.00 SY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Remove Bituminous Driveway 100.00 2.50 SY 255.00 637.50 255.00 637.50 I Remove Concrete Driveway 50.00 5.00 SY 0.00 0.00 100.00 500.00 Adjust Manhole Casting 1.00 100.00 Each 1.00 100.00 1.00 100.00 I'�, �d 1.200.00 2.50 SY 350.00 875.00 450.00 1.125.00 Class 5 Gradation Test 1.00 70.00 Each 0.00 0.00 1.00 70.00 Class 5 in Place Density Test 2.00 40.00 Each 0.00 0.00 1.00 40.00 Concrete Test Cylinde� (set of 3) 2.00 40.00 Each 0.00 0.00 1.00 40.00 8it. Extraction & Gradation Test 1.00 50.00 Each 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hydrant Relocation 1.00 2,000.00 Each 0.00 0.00 1.00 2,000.00 ' tnsta(t 1 ftwide Stop Bar (Po(-Prefrmj 30.00 10.00 LF 16.00 t60.00 16.00 160.00 Install New Catch Basin w/Casting t.00 t,200.00 Each 0.00 0.00 1.00 1,200.00 I Class 5 ProcLOr Test 1.00 100.00 Each 0.00 0.00 1.00 100.00 I Bituminous Air Voids Test 1.00 100.00 Each 0.00 0.00 1.00 t 00.00 Concrete Cu�b & Gutte� DE B-6-18 760.00 7.00 LF 0.00 0.00 760.00 5,320.00 12 i�. RCP Storm Sewer (Class 111) 50.00 40.00 LF 0.00 0.00 40.00 1.600.00 Adjust Catch Basin Castings 4.00 100.00 Each 0.00 0.00 4.00 , 400.00 Furnish/Install New MH Casting 1.00 300.00 Each 1.00 300.00 1.00 300.00 Fumish/Install New Catch Basin Cast'g 1.00 400.00 Each 0.00 0.00 1.00 400.00 TOTAL THIS ESTIMATE 22L a�2,00s.00 TOTAL AMOUNT Z46,360.00 Bituminous Consuiting � Co�tracti�g Co. Inc. tstimate No. 2 (FINAL) SUMMARY: Original Contract Amount Contract additions C.O.# 1 Contract deductions — Revised contract amount Value Completed To Date Amount Retained (0%) Less Amount Paid Previously AMOUNT DUE THIS ESTIMATE CERTIFICATE OF THE CONTRACTOR $58,150.00 58,150.00 46,360.00 0.00 34,351.00 $12,009.00 PAGE 2 I hereby certify that the work performed and the materials supplied to date under the terms of the contract for this project, and all authorized changes thereto, have an actuai value under the contract of the amounts shown on this estimate (and the final quantities on the final estimate are correct), and that this estimate is just and correc n art o e'Amount Due This Estimate' has been received. By - Contractor's Authorized Rep�esentative (Title) CERTIFICATE OF THE ENGINEER f hereby certify that I have prepa�ed or examined this estimate, and that the contractor is entitled to payment of this estimate under the contract for reference project. CITY OF FRIDLEY, INSPECTOR By Checked By 22M Date: � � � -�� Respectfully Submitted :� i� G. Flora. PE �� irector of Public Works