02/13/1995 - 4894/, ''�
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING
ATTENDENCE SHEET
Monday, February ]3, 1995
7:30 P.M.
�PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
ITEM
NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER
�r�. � �Z � � � !�� �, lL �t..c.:D Z � � 1 � � l � �—
. ` , �� �
� �
. ��
��:�r,�, ����1� z��. 1��--���;, ����- �� ��u►�. ��-3� ���-3,�
�� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
�
c�r oF FEBRUARY 13 1995
FRlDLEY �
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment,
or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request,
accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services,
programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities
who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance.
(TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of January 23, 1995
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
OLD BUSINESS:
Second Reading of an Ordinance
Under Section 12.06 of the City
Charter Declaring Certain Reaf
Estate to be Surplus and Authorizing
the Sale Thereof (South 35 Feet of
5720 Poik Street N.E.) (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.01 - 1.02
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1995 Paae 2
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS:
Receive the Minutes of the Planning
Commission Meeting of February 1, 1995: ........ 2.01 - 2.09
Establish a Public Hearing for
February 27, 1995, for Consideration
of a Vacation Request, SAV #94-04,
by Ceann Haluptzok, to Vacate a
Small Portion of a Drainage and �
Utility Easement in Order to Correct
A Garage Encroachment, Generally
Located at 7580 Brigadoon Place
N. E. (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.01 - 3.04
Special Use Permit Request,
SP #94-20, by John Wuchko of
MAACO Auto Painfiing and
Bodyworks, to Allow Outdoor
Storage of Materials and Equipment,
Generally Located at 148 Osborne
Road N. E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.01 - 4.23
Approve 1995 Community Development
Block Grant Program and Application . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.01 - 5.17
r-
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL M;EETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1995
,
�,�-��
�
`
CIiY OF
FR(OLEY
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment,
or employment in its services, prc�grams, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status with regard to public assistance. Upon request,
accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of Fridley's services,
programs, and activities. Hearin3; impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities
who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. (TTD/572-
3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
APPROVAl. OF MlNUTES:
City Council Meeting of January 23, 1995
�"`'G9,�.t�v_`,s (' CL�.- `"i,�'�s-�'C�
l !�
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
OLD BUSINESS:
r� Second Reading of an Ordinance
Under Section 12.06 of the City
Charter Declaring Certain Real
Estate to be Surplus and Authorizing
the Sale Thereof (South 35 Feet of
5720 Polk Street N.E.) (Ward 2) ... 1.01 -1.02
v'�'`� .,-� , � '.�'
cz..�/�'7�C��
/��'.�
NEW BUSINESS:
Receive the Minutes of the Planning
Commission Meeting of February 1,
1995: �. . . t .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.01 - 2.09
Establish a Public Hearing fo�
February 27, 1995, for Consideration
of a Vacation Request, SAV #94-04,.
by Ceann Haluptzok, to Vacate a
Small Po�tion of a Drainage and
Utility Easement in Order to Correct
A Garage Encroachment, Generally
Located at 7580 Brigadoon P(ace
N.E. (Ward 2) . . . . . . . . . . - -
,--d�'"' �� ' �-
NEW BUSINESS LCONTINUED�:
Special Use Permit Request,
SP #94-20, by John Wuchko of
MAACO Auto Painting and
Bodyworks, to Allow Outdoor
Storage of Materials and Equipment,
Generally Located at 148 Osborne
Road N.E. (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.01 - 4.23
�
� Approve 1995 Community Development
Block Grant ProgFam and
Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.01 - 5.17
/ �� ��� Zi a %'��
�Approve Change Order No. 2 to
Locke Lake Dam Restoration, Project
No.211 ..................... 6.01-6.03
�
Receive Bids and Award Contract
for Asphalt Pothole Patcher ...... 7_01 - 7.03
�� r�- ��---��-�-
������ � � G��
C
3.01 - 3.04 -- .
z-�2,7�1r-I�_
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA•
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUEDI-
Receive Bids and Award Contract
for 1,100 Gallon Hot Asphalt Tank 8.01 - 8.02
�c.�� � ���
Receive Bids and Award Contract
for Crum Rubber Melting Pot ..... 9.01 - 9.02
/�� � �x���
Resolution O�dering Improvement,
Approval of Plans and Ordering
Advertisement for Bids: Sanitary
and Storm Sewer Repair Project
No. 277 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.01 - 10.06
�_� ��'''�,�GC� �z .
Resolution Deferring Special
Assessment Payments for Senior
Citizens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.01 - 11.03
�-�_ .
Resolution Authorizing Signing an
Agreement for Certain Employees
Represented by International Union
of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49,
AFl-CIO (Pub{ic Works Maintenance)
for 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.01 - 12.37
���'� %��L-�-�� �� ,
Receive Petitions from Residents of
76th Way N.E. for a"Dead End"
Street Sign and the Installation of a
St�eet Light (Ward 3) _ . . . . . . . . . _ 13.01 - 13.03
/ �� �.
► ti �
t ..
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED):
Appoint Marcy Sibeil to the Fridley
Parks and Recreation Commission 14.01
�9�%'� `
�. ��
Reappoint Mavis Hauge to the Police
Civil Service Commission . . . . . . . 15.01
� �l��L..-� %'I. �i�'�.s�_
Claims .. %�� ...........:: 16.01
Licenses . . . (:`� ' . . . . . . . . 17.01 - 17.06
Estimates . . /�� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.01
ADOPTtON OF AGENDA:
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
�� ���. /,.y�-: c.�-
/�.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Modify Redevelopment Plan and to
Create Tax Inc�ement Financing District
No. 13 (Southwest Quadrant) (Ward 1)
c� '' ,%s Z
� -� ; � �
. . . 19.01 - 19.16
• '� . ,
NEW BUSINESS:
Resolution Approving and Adopting
the Proposed Modifications to
Redevelopment Project No. 1, TIF
Districts Nos. 1 through 12, and the
Creation of TIF District No. 13 . . . . . . . . . . 20.01 - 20.06
l,,�L��-�-'� ,�— ,
Receive an Item from the Appeals
Commission Meeting of January 31, 1995: 21.01 - 21.10
A. Variance Request, VAR #9:5-01, by
Equity Developers, Inc., to Reduce
the Required Lot Area From 32,670
Square Feet to 23,000 Square Feet,
Generally Located at 970 C)sbome
Road N.E. (Ward 2)
,�-,L,,� ��" d�"
�.--�s���
� ��� -
Approve Proposal by Short Elliott
Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) to Assist in
the Preparation of the Fridley
Community Water Supply, Emergency
and Conservation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22.01 - 22.08
✓��, -
� � / �.~t'r
Resolution Designating Minimum Fund
Balances for the Genera( Fund, Special
Revenue Funds and the Capital
Improvement Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23.01 - 23.03
G� ���' %lp� ,
Approve Proposal from MSA, Consulting
Engineers for Water Treatment Study .... 24.01 - 24.14
����� �� �-_
� �.
��,, �
Informal Stat Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25.01
�� . �y',� :.-� 19��-�-�..-�.,
e�r..-t', � /� �- �-v-`��.�'-"""
� / s � �v
ADJOURN:
�'% � ,� �
�
�
FRiDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 93, 1995
APPROVAL OF PROPOS�D CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CUNTINUEDI:
Approve Change Order No. 2 to Locke
Lake Dam Restoration, Project No. 211 . . . . . . . . . 6.01 - 6.03
Receive Bids and A�nrard Contract
for Asphalt Pothole F'atcher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.01 - 7.03
Receive Bids and Avvard Contract
for 1,100 Gallon Hot Asphait Tank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.01 - 8.02
Receive Bids and Auvard Contract
for Crum Rubber ME�Iting Pot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolution Orderingl Improvement,
Approval of Plans and Ordering
Advertisement for B�ids: Sanitary
and Storm Sewer Repair Project
9.01 - 9.02
Page 3
No. 277 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.01 - 10.06
� �
1
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCiL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1995 Page 4
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA•
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�
Resolution Deferring Special
Assessment Payments for Senior
Citizens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.01 - 'I 1.03
Resolution Authorizing Signing an
Agreement for Certain Employees
Represented by International Union
of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49,
AFL-CIO (Public Works Maintenance)
for1995 .................................. 12.01-12.37
Receive Petitions from Residents of
76th Way N. E. for a"Dead End"
Street Sign and the Installation of a
Street Light (Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13.01 - 13.03
Appoint Marcy Sibell to the Fridley
Parks and Recreation Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.01
Reappoint Mavis Hauge to the Police
Civil Service Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.01
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1995 Page 5
APPROVAL OF PROPOSEID CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (COINTINUED):
Claims................................... 16.01
Licenses .................................. 17.01-17.06
Estimates ................................. 18.01
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
OPEN FORUM, VtSITORS_
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 13, 1995
PUBLIC HEARING:
Modify Redevelopment Plan and to
Create Tax Increment Financing District
No. 13 (Southwest Quadrant) (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.01 - 19.16
NEW BUSINESS:
Resolution Approving and Adopting
the Proposed Modifications to
Redeve(opment Project No. 1, TIF
Districts Nos. 1 through 12, and the
Creation of TIF District No. 13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.01 - 20.06
Receive an ltem from the Appeals
Commission Meeting of January 31, 1995: . . . . . . . . . . . . 21.01 - 21.10
A. Variance Request, VAR #95-01, by
Equity Developers, Inc., to Reduce
the Required Lot Area From 32,670
Square Feet to 23,000 Square Feet,
Generally Located at 970 Osborne
Road N.E. (Ward 2)
Page 6
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MNET�NG OF FEBRUARY 13, 1995
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED :
Approve Proposal by Short Elliott
Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) to ��ssist in
the Preparation of the FridiE:y
Community Water Suppiy, E=mergency
and Conservation Pian . . . . . . . . . . .
............... 22.01 -22.08
Resolution Designating Mir�imum Fund
Balances for the General Fund, Special
Revenue Funds and the C<�pital Improvement
Fund..................................... 23.01-23.03
Approve Proposal from M�iA, Consulting
Engineers for Water Treatment Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24.01 - 24.14
Informal Status Reports
ADJOURN:
.......................... 25.01
Page 7
I _ �
! � � �
� ��
I �
� ';., _
i � � �`
��w� .
� ��,� - �
� �� �� �
�:�
� , w� � � �
. ,;�
��
.� �� � � � � �
;
r
i
,
�:�� � � �
� �
, �
1 �� �
� �
- �.���
I k A�
I �
I �
I �
I
II � �
r4j � `� ", .. � I .
i I '. � .. - �.
�
}
I
�
� �..
".^ .
I t I
i
� ��
,
h 4k+ F - 1 .
I i -
.
, �
�
i '�,' �
�
�
i �
� ,��
�
�� ' � z � �
�
i ��� �
�' ��
� �
,.� �
a�, _ �� � �� �
k� �
i �
�.
�
��'�,
��,, _} �*
��
4 �x�
s`' � a
� �
� `� ;: �t � . . �,.".''4: '
s?a"
�b ���� - , ..
� � � ±
a� � � t . ' 1 r . � _ . .
�� fi
�if � �t; L ., .:. . ; '
��� ;
� �i�
. � . . � L - ;n�.
�� � N� S
� � �
�« d �t�"., i
{ ` s��# ��
r a
. .. . . . �. .:{� ��� �::�: � �
� �
� � T
I `
I :
�. 1 !
� j���€ I i � ...
�
�. I 1.
d �
� � § g� u` - � � .
S „ �y1�� ' ..J
�
1 �' � I
� r �} _ �+x � i _
�
i
�
. . .. % � ': � .
`h
�y .��.,f ' . .
yr� �
.. �{'.,_ ..�I �.
. '%. . .. s �, �, � ` ��. � ..
� . . �9i � '� .
... .-� . .. . � . .�� �
� i
. . . .. . � � i . .
I
M1 i ,
`'�� f
se �r �'
S fi
�.��.5¢,. ���`,,
� 3�aM� Y+� �r � 'y'� . .
P#� [F y
i�.� g _ ., . .
.. -0. .�� . .. .
A.. '
. . , . � `� .: �., �" . �
, ��'ST.'i . � , ,.
i T �.
. . � ' 4�-'�.t �. �. .
. . . .. �,: _�1,... �. . . .
1
I
F <x.r � dd t; � ..
Wr
,� �S j �,. ' .
�'` �� Y . .� �1
�
� , �4"`, �#4 � 3
� � �..
� �
�, �
r
,
� � �� �
� ; i
���#:' ;
;
��.;�
�
ders �:
l 4i
I
+ I
� �`(�
Ir
'
f :. "
1
I
I
( .
i
f"
�
i
-,
I
i
�
��'; �'�. 3 ��,�,:.
��«�
i�,� ;
�, y. , :
Y�
�
: ,
d ; ' a_
� � $
d5 �a�
;{ t ��. b k��'4
, �, � �r � a �� � �-�
. ��,�3 �� � �-: e �`� � �` �- �,��.,� §� "
� P��. �� ��� � � � � � �
�f f+ � �i ���i` }+ � � �
�y � y�,� �
�3
-. { f 4z,,;�d �_" '. p� .'�x,
� � F
��,. p ��'��9� �'�±. �� �-;�1e ��.�
, . ��i� ., � '� •f�. . �
� � �� S. � �.:
-�
�' s. �b'^ r 4.
i u ��, x b
>
�, ,,
., . . .
,..
�� � ,
�a� I. �
� � � rr ,.. .��; � j . � �,
. �
F ;,�i x � t f I�.:
.. ' � I i ��� �
. . . �...j ��.,.
f ; ,�H I
, � i 1
� � �u
� � � �
� � �. . i€u, �� I
� � ; I
} F��
. ��- t � �,3 J,Frfi�`'. }�
.�,*�,`-�. �,{'� k + .,_ �
. s r,�'" � - �°�;
i
� _
y ��
��3
'.
i.:
!' ,x
{
._a. : ��ut� � :�. '
;t
�
k}'� .
�,�, �...; �
� *.�°' � � �f
:�� ��
x �
s '� '
a # �� .
�� � °
d
� %b.�
��'w
THE MINUTES OF THE REG�LAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
JANUARY 23. 1995
The Regular Meeting of t:he Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Counc.il and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman
Billings, Councilman Schneider and Councilwoman
Bolkcom
MEMBERS ABSENT: Non.e
ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE TO NEW FIREFIGHTERB:
Mr. McKusick, Fire Chief, introduced the new paid-on-call fire-
fighters for the City�. He stated that these recruits have
completed 150 hours of classroom training and 250 hours of field
work. He stated that they have received training in fire sup-
pression, emergency med.ical, and handling of hazardous materials.
Mr. McKusick stated that this class scored extremely high in the
Firefighter I examination and recently took the Firefighter II
examination.
Mr. Larson, Deputy Fire: Chief, administered the oath of office to
the following new firefighters: Jamey Ahlgrim, Scott Allard, Mark
Blake, Merle Fischer, Steve Johnson, Todd Messer, Pete Meyers,
James Tschida, and John� Wozniak. Mr. Dave Skirka, Assistant Fire
Chief, presented badges to the new firefighters, and Mr. Ralph
Messer, a veteran firei=ighter for the City, presented a badge to
his son, Todd Messer.
Mayor Nee, members of' the Council, and staff extended their
congratulations to these new paid-on-call firefighters. Mayor Nee
stated that he was glad they have joined the Fridley firefighters.
He stated that the FirEa Department has been a great credit and a
tradition of service tc� the community for many years.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
COUNCIL MEETING. J'ANUARY 9, 1995•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the minutes as presented.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declaredl the motion carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 23 1995 PAGE 2
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
Councilman Schneider requested that Item 7 be removed from the
consent agenda and placed on the regular agenda.
There were no comments from the public on the consent agenda.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, briefly reviewed each item on the consent
agenda.
MoTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the consent agenda items,
with the deletion of Item 7. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion
carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS:
1. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1043 AMENDING CHAPTERS 506 AND
128 OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE REGARDING THE PARKING OF LARGE
COMMERCIAL VEHICLES (TABLED JANUARY 9, 1995):
Mr. Burns stated that since the last meeting, language has
been added to Section 506.13.6 to read as follows: "No person
shall park or leave standing a truck tractor, semi-trailer,
bus (except for school buses during normal operation of t�heir
routes between 7:00 a.m. and 9:0o a.m. on weekday mornings)
... ".
WAIVED READING, ADOPTED ORDINANCE, AND ORDERED PUBLICATION.
2. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 1044 ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 403
ENTITLED "SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONS" TO THE FRIDLEY CITY
CODE •
Mr. Burns stated that this is also known as the sump pump
ordinance. He stated that the ordinance applies to discharge
of water from roofs, sump pumps, footing tiles, etc. into the
sanitary sewer. He stated that in addition, the ordinance
requires permanently installed discharge lines from sump pumps
to the outside of a building or to the storm sewer and incen-
tives are available for disconnections. He stated that there
is also a penalty imposed to property owners not in
compliance.
WAIVED READING, ADOPTED ORDINANCE, AND ORDERED PUBLICATION.
NEW BUSINESS•
3. RECEIVE BIDS AND AWARD PROPOSAL FOR A SINGLE AXLE DUMP TRUCK:
Mr. Burns reported that two bids were received for this single
axle dump truck, and it is recommended that the bid be awarded
to Boyer Ford Trucks in the amount of $39,814.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL M1sETING OF JANIIARY 23, 1995 PAGE 3
RECEIVED BIDS AND AWARDED CONTRACT TO BOYER FORD TRUCKS FOR
$39,814.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 9•-1995 AUTHORIZING THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO
SUBMIT A PROPOSAL 'I'O THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
FOR APPOINTMENT AS_A CHEMICAL ASSESSMENT TEAM, AND AUTHORIZING
THE FRIDLEY FIRE ��HIEF TO SERVE AS THE ADMINISTRATOR OF ANY
RESULTING CONTRAC7':
Mr. Burns stated that this proposal would be submitted to the
Minnesota Departm�:nt of Public Safety for the appointment of
a Chemical Assessment Team. He said that Fridley is one of
four fire departmE�nts involved that would be responsible for
hazardous materials assessment and recommendations for actions
necessary to protE:ct life and property.
ADOPTED.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 10-1995 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
SPLITTING/COMBINATION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON: LOT 1.
BLOCK 10, GREAT NC►RTHERN INDUSTRIAL CENTER:
�
7.
Mr. Burns stated t:hat this resolution spreads the assessments
from one to two lc�ts for water, sewer, and storm sewer.
ADOPTED.
MOTION TO WAIVE THE EXCLUSION OF SHORT TERM DISABILITY
BENEFITS• .
Mr. Burns stated t:hat this proposal applies to LaVon Regnier,
Liquor Store Manag��r. He stated that this person was inadver-
tently promised s:hort term benefits and it was later dis-
covered that benE�fits did not apply due to probationary
status. He stated that after a review of this issue with
attorneys, it is recommended Council approve this waiver.
APPROVED.
APPROVE CONTRIBUTION TO SOUTHERN ANOKA COMMIJNITY CONSORTIUM:
This item was remc�ved from the consent agenda and placed on
the regular agenda.
8. APPOINTMENT: CITY EMPLOYEE:
Jon Wilczek, Assistant
February 6, 1995.
APPROVED.
Public Works Director, starting
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANOARY 23, 1995 PAGE 4
9. CLAIMS•
Nos. 59761 through 60006.
APPROVED.
10. LICENSES•
APPROVED.
11. ESTIMATES•
APPROVED.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adopt the agenda with the
addition of Item 7 from the consent agenda. Seconded by Council-
woman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITOR5:
There was no response
business.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
from the audience under this item of
12. PUBLIC HEARING ON ANOKA COUNTY IMPROVEMENTS ON EAST RIVER ROAD
FROM KIMBALL STREET TO HIGHWAY 610. EAST RIVER ROAD IMPROVE-
MENT PROJECT NO. ST. 1995-4 (WARD 3):
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to
hearing notice and open the public
Billings. Upon a voice vote, all
the motion carried unanimously ar
7:48 p.m.
waive the reading of the public
hearing. Seconded by Councilman
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
.d the public hearing opened at
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that Anoka County will be
improving East River Road from Kimball Street north to Highway 610.
He said that this project only minimally affects Fridley. Three
properties will be improved with concrete curb, gutter, and a
median. The remaining portion between Kimball and Rickard Road is
scheduled for improvement in 1996. He suggested that assessments
be deferred for the concrete curb on this particular project and
this improvement be incorporated into the overall east River Road
improvements scheduled for 1996.
Mr. Flora reported that residents have been notified of this
improvement and of an assessment not to exceed $10.00 per front
foot, as well as a notice of a delay in the assessment until the
major East River Road project is completed.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL ME�ETING OF JANUARY 23, 1995 PAGE 5
No persons spoke regarcling this proposed improvement.
MOTION by Councilwoma:n Bolkcom to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declarE:d the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed a�t 7:50 p.m.
13. PUBLIC HEARING ODT 1995 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
PROGRAM•
MOTION by Councilman B:illings to waive the reading of the public
hearing notice and oper,i the public hearing. Seconded by Council-
woman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
opened at 7:50 p.m.
Mr. Fernelius, HRA Hous,ing Coordinator, stated that this year the
City will receive $155,210 in Community Development Block Grant
Funds, and staff is rE:commending the funds be used for housing
rehabilitation and pub:lic service activities. He said that the
Human Resources Commission will be submitting a recommendation
regarding the public service allocation. He stated that it is
proposed the funds be a.11ocated as follows: $124,210 for housing
rehabilitation; $25,OOCi for public service; $2,500 for the ACCAP
Senior outreach Progr<�m; $2,500 for the Fridley Senior Home
Companion Program; and �$1,000 to cover the County's administration
fee.
Councilman Schneider a:sked how many persons received assistance
last year from the housing rehabilitation program.
Mr. Fernelius reported that 21 single family households received
assistance.
Ms. Cathey Weidmann, S�enior Outreach Coordinator for the Anoka
County Community Action Program (ACCAP), thanked Council for their
past support and fundirig. She explained their needs for 1995/96
and said that the Outreach Worker could serve ten to twelve persons
a week working twenty hours but could only serve five to six people
working twelve hours. She stated that if there are cutbacks in
Washington, they may not have some of the energy assistance funds
available to subsidize the Outreach Worker. She said that 34
percent of their refer��als were for food, and the rest were for
heating assistance so they are serving people with very basic
needs.
Ms. Weidmann stated tha-t 146 individuals were served last year, 76
percent of which were :below the poverty guidelines. She stated
that 79 percent were pe�rsons living alone, 76 percent were female,
and 25 percent were disabled.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1995 PAGE 6
No other persons in the audience spoke regarding the Community
Development Block Grant funding.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to close the public hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the
public hearing closed at 8:01 p.m.
14. PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT (ZTA #94-02) TO
RECODIFY THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE CHAPTER 205 ENTITLED "ZONING"
BY AMENDING SECTION 205._17.O1.C., TO ALLOW AUTOMOBILE STORAGE
AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO ADJACENT AUTOMOBILE SALES FACILITIES
GENERALLY LOCATED TO THE EAST OF THE FRIENDLY CHEVROLET
PROPERTY, 7501 HIGHWAY 65 N.E. (WARD 2)•
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to waive the reading of th� public
hearing notice and open the public hearing. Seconded by Council-
woman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously and the public hearing
opened at 8:02 p.m.
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, said the petitioner has
requested this public hearing to be continued.
Mayor Nee asked if anyone was present regarding this item, and
there was no response.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to continue this public hearing to
the Council meeting of February 27, 1995. Seconded by Councilwoman
,Torgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS•
15. RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR WATER RATE CHANGE (TABLED JANUARY 9
1995 :
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to remove this item from the
table. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Pribyl, Finance Director, reported that staff has reviewed with
Council the forecasts for the utility funds and recommended
increases. He stated that this resolution provides for a rate
increase. He announced that Mr. Tom Roushar of Maier Stewart &
Associates was present to answer questions raised by Council on
water quality.
Mr. Roushar stated that the City has thirteen wells, and he
reviewed the quantities of water pumped from these wells. He
stated that the unfiltered wells, Nos. 1, 12, and 13, have more
iron and manganese. He said that the wells in Commons Park have
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MF;ETING OF JANUARY 23, 1995 PAGE 7
a.05 iron and .02 manganese content, the same as the wells in
Locke Park. He stated that the secondary standards set by the EPA
are .30 for iron and .03 for manganese. Since Locke Park has been
back in operation, the unfiltered water has decreased. He stated
that as much as 40 per�cent was unfiltered in 1993, and this has
dropped to 34 percent i�1 1994. It should continue to decrease with
the rehabilitation of t:he Locke Park plant.
Mr. Roushar stated that the Fridley/New Brighton interconnect went
on line in May. He sa.id that all the water is not filtered for
iron and manganese remo�val. He also reported that a plant is under
construction for the rE.moval of iron and manganese and should be
in operation no later t:han September, 1995.
Mr. Roushar stated thai� New Brighton has also suffered from some
water quality problems and has had manganese complaints. He said
that there are two sit�:�ations which may have led to this problem;
the start up of the Plunle Ground Recovery System plant and a switch
in polyphosphate additi.ves.
Mr. Roushar stated th<�t the Safe Drinking Water Act addresses
primary and secondary drinking water regulations. With TCE, a
suspected carcinogen, i,here is a maximum level established under
the primary regulation:;. He said that iron and manganese, which
may adversely affect the odor and appearance of the water, are
considered secondary re�gulations.
Councilwoman Jorgenson felt that Wells 1, 12, and 13 are signifi-
cantly higher than th,e secondary standard for both iron and
manganese.
Mr. Roushar stated that: the situation would improve in 1995. He
said one of the drawbacks in Fridley is not getting substantial
use of all the wells, as Wells 6, 7, 8, and 9 have TCE conta-
mination; therefore foi-cing the use of Wells 1, 12, and 13. He
stated that with Locke Park back on line and the new plant in New
Brighton, this will help immensely.
Mr. Roushar stated that: the Water Department operating staff has
two concerns which is i�o meet the primary regulations concerning
TCE contamination which affects health and meet secondary regula-
tions which affects appearance. He stated that it is a balancing
act which problem is worse, and the Water Department is forced to
meet the primary regulations.
Councilwoman Jorgenson ��sked if the wells could be filtered through
the Commons Park system.
Mr. Roushar stated tha�t it would be less costly to filter them
separately.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANIIARY 23 1995 PAGE 8
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked what areas in the City were serviced
by Wells 1, 12, and 13.
Mr. Saefke, Water Supervisor, stated that Well 1 services the area
near Target and to the east. He said that Well 12 generally serves
the northeast area of the City, and Well 13 services primarily the
industrial areas and FMC.
Councilman Billings asked where the New Brighton water enters
Fridley's water system and where the area is that is most affected.
Mr. Roushar stated that the water from New Brighton flows through
the new 63rd Avenue booster station and connects to a main that
runs on the west side of Highway 65. He said that the City has
recently reduced dependence on the 63rd Avenue booster station and
has started using Well 12 to draw the water and to pump it into the
intermediate zone. He stated that this is an attempt to dispel and
blend the water throughout the City.
Councilman Schneider asked if the water from Well 12 was worse than
the water from New Brighton.
Mr. Roushar said that the water from Well 12 is quite high in man-
ganese and varies from .3 to .5.
Councilman Schneider asked where most of the City's water came from
before the City received the New Brighton water.
Mr. Roushar replied that Commons Park supplied most of the water
for the system.
Councilman Schneider asked if Fridley's water quality would improve
if the New Brighton supply of water was discontinued.
Mr. Roushar said that based on the water now coming from New
Brighton versus only Commons Park, he would say there would be an
improvement.
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that if this was done, the
City would have to rely heavily on Wells 12 and 13. He said that
there is also limited filtering capacity, as Commons Park has only
two filters which cannot service all of Well Nos. 2, 3, 4 ahd 5
simultaneously. He stated that possibly some internal piping could
be done to redirect the flow from Welis 2, 3, 4, and 5 into the
filters and disconnect the Jordan Wells Nos. 6, 7, � and 9 from the
filter system.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked what it would cost to expand the
filtering capacity at Commons Park.
Mr. Flora thought the cost would probably be about $300,000 a
filter.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL M�ETING OF JANUARY 23 1995 PAGE 9
Mr. Roushar said that Well 3 also has some problems as it pumps
sand.
Mr. Saefke stated that Wells 2, 4, and 5 produce only about half
the capacity of what WEalls 6, 7, and 8 could produce.
Mr. Roushar stated that about 40 percent of the City's water supply
is in the contaminated wells.
Mr. Flora said that We:Lls 6, 7, and 8 are used during the summer
months, and the water f:rom these wells is blended with the deeper
wells in order to meet the guidelines for TCE contamination. He
stated that the ideal ;situation would be to have filters for the
entire system. He fel,t, however, that by this fall with the New
Brighton plant, the City would satisfy their winter demand with
totally filtered water. He said in the summer months, the City
may have to use Wells E>, 7, 8, 12, 13 and 1.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that with Wells 1, 12, and 13 there
is an odor and staining problem. She felt that if the water
quality is not acceptable, people may discontinue its use. She
said that the resident�; want clean, odorless and tasteless water,
without TCE. She askecl how the City could accomplish this goal.
Mr. Flora said that Wells 1, 12, and 13 have been producing the
same quality of water :aince they were placed into operation.. He
stated that when the Lo��ke Park plant was not on line, the City was
producing a Zesser qtiality water than what the City is now
receiving from New Bric�hton.
Mr. Roushar stated that: because Fridley has a distributed system,
there is not the opport:unity for blending so there will be neigh-
borhood differences in the water quality.
Councilman Billings sa:id he would like some figures on the cost
for filtering Wells 1 and 12 since both of these wells service
primarily the resident:�al areas and are predominantly in Ward 1.
He stated that Well 13 predominantly services an industrial area
and only occasionally a�ffects the residences.
Councilman Billings saxd Well 1 has been in operation since 1957
and Well 12 has been in operation since 1970 that it will be
necessary to increase the cost of water in order to pay for
improvements. He felt that by filtering Wells 1 and 12 it would
mean additional increas;es, but would hopefully supply everyone in
the City with quality w�ater.
Councilman Schneider :5aid he felt that every citizen in the
community deserves qua:Lity water, but his objection to the rate
increase is that he did not feel anyone can arbitrarily raise rates
for a poor or inferior product. He said the water quality is no
better than before, in some cases it is worse, and that is where
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 23 1995 PAGE 10
he has a problem with the rate increase. He said he totally agrees
there needs to be a continuing update of the water system.
Councilman Billings felt the water quality on the whole is better.
He stated that some homes may have a lesser quality, and some may
have higher quality. He said the water rates have not changed
since 1990, and the proposed increase is 9.5 percent. He felt that
if the rates had been increasing on an on-going basis, based on the
cost of living, they would probably be higher than this proposed
increase. He stated that Fridley's rates in comparison with other
communities are in the lower third.
Councilman Schneider said this increase is the first in a series
over a four-year period so it would really amount to a forty
percent increase or an average of about ten percent a year.
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that she has received complaints
about the water quality from persons all over the City since the
City began receiving the New Brighton water. She said she agrees
that something has to be done with Wells 1 and 12. She felt that
everyone should receive quality water. She suggested this item be
tabled until costs are obtained for a fiTtration system. She
stated that one of her primary concerns about raising rates is the
27 percent increase for commercial and industrial users. She said
this may cause a decrease in water consumption because of the cost
and quality of water, but did not want to get into a spiral. where
rates are increased and consumption decreases.
Councilman Billings stated that he was not sure what tabling this
item would accomplish. He felt that if Council wished to proceed
to install filters for Wells 1 and 12, it would mean increased
costs. He said that the City is also faced with possibly subsi-
dizing the Water Fund from the General fund. He stated that the
cost for operating the system will still be there regardless if
there is or is not a rate increase. He stated that the alterna-
tives are to raise property taxes or to increase water rates.
Mr. Saefke stated that based on recent construction and very rough
estimates, the cost for filtering Well 12 would be $1.5 million,
and the cost for Well 1 would be $750,000.
Mr. Roushar said that it is uncommon for a City to filter all its
water. He said that if the water can get in and out of the system
rapidly, it diminishes the negative effects from iron and
manganese.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked Mr. Roushar if he had any
recommendations.
Mr. Roushar thought that Well 12, in regards to manganese is bad,
but it is a very sound well and does not pump sand. It seems to
him that it would be a logical place to build a water plant, as
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MrETING OF JANUARY 23. 1995 PAGE 11
Well 1 has its sand pr•oblems and is not in the same category in
terms of reliability oi° Well 12. He felt there is also greater
capacity in Well 12, p7Lus it is not contaminated at this time but
is a shallow well.
Mr. Roushar reported t:hat New Brighton's PGAC plant is less than
two miles from Commons Park. He said he is not convinced that the
contamination is not ar,i arsenal problem. He said he has discussed
this with Leisch & As��ociates, and they remain unconvinced that
this could not possibl}� be an arsenal problem. He stated that it
has a different contam:inant signature from those in New Brighton,
as it is primarily TCE. He felt that if it was known who may have
dumped this contaminant;, there would be grounds for legal action.
Councilman Billings asked how he would rate Fridley's water in
comparison with water nf our metropolitan cities.
Mr. Roushar said that F:ridley's water was at least average in 1994,
and he believed in 1995 it would be above average. He stated that
iron and manganese c;omplaints are one of the most common
complaints. He suggest�ed that the way to solve the problem would
be to soften the wate:r completely, which would be a tremendous
cost.
Mayor Nee said he felt the timing was not right to raise the water
rates when the water quality was poor.
Councilman Billings agr.eed that the timing may not be right since
some people are experiE.ncing a lesser quality water. By the same
token, he said that tr�ere are people benefitting from the Locke
Park filtration plant �ind receiving a better quaZity product. He
felt that the water is at least as good or better than it has been
in a long time on an ��verall basis. He said that the delay in
raising rates would mean even higher rates in the future to cover
the losses. He felt that delaying the rate increase is not
productive.
Mayor Nee said that by this fall, the filtration plant at New
Brighton would be completed, and it could be determined if the
water quality has improved.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table this item until this iall
in order to review th�e costs for filtering Well 12 and other
options in Commons Parl�. This item is to be brought back to the
Council at the discre�tion of the City Manager. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, Councilwoman Bolkcom,
Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman Schneider, and Mayor Nee voted
in favor of the motion. Councilman Billings voted against the
motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1 vote.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 23. 1995 PAGE 12
16. 1995 CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO VARIOUS AGENCIES:
AND
LIST OF COMMISSION MEMBERS WHOSE TERMS EXPIRE APRIL 1 1995
AND JUNE 9, 1995 LTABLED JANUARY 9, 1995):
Mayor Nee removed this item from the table.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to nominate Councilman Schneider
for appointment as Mayor Pro Tem.
There being no further nominations, the nominations were closed by
Mayor Nee and an unanimous ballot cast for the appointment of
Councilman Schneider as Mayor Pro Tem.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to re-appoint the same representa-
tives to various agencies as follows:
Anoka County Law Enforcement Council:
Councilman Schneider, Representative
Councilwoman Jorgenson, Alternate
Suburban Rate Authority:
John Flora, Public Works Director, Representative
Assistant Public Works Director, Alternate
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities:
Councilwoman Jorgenson, Delegate
Councilwoman Bolkcom, Alternate
School District Nos. 13 and 14:
Councilwoman Bolkcom, Representative
Councilman Billings, Alternate
School District No. 16:
Councilwoman Billings, Representative
Councilman Schneider, Alternate
League of Minnesota Cities:
Councilman Billings, Representative
Councilwoman Jorgenson, Alternate
North Metro Convention & Visitors Bureau:
William Hunt, Assistant to the City Manager
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL M]�ETING OF JANIIARY 23. 1995 PAGE 13
Seconded by Councilwomain Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Sc��hneider to reappoint the following persons,
who have indicated they� wished to be reappointed, to the following
Commissions:
Diane Savage, Appeals (.ommission
Bruce Bondow, EnvironmE.ntal Quality and Energy Commission
Dean Saba, Environmental Quality and Energy Commission
LeRoy Oquist, Human Re:aources Commission
Richard Young, Parks and Recreation Commission
Tim Solberg, Parks and Recreation Commission
Gen Peterson, Cable Tekevision Commission
Virginia Schnabel, Hou:�ing and Redevelopment Authority
Seconded by Councilwoma�n Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Sclhneider to table the reappointment of Steven
Stark, Environmental Quality and Energy Commission; and Mavis
Hauge, Police Commission until staff is able to contact them.
Further, to table the a��pointment to the Human Resources Commission
to fill Charles Welf's ��osition who indicated he was not interested
in reappointment. Sec:onded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
17. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE UNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE
FRIDLEY CITY CHAFtTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE
SURPLUS AND AUTHO:RIZING THE SALE THEREOF (SOUTH 35 FEET OF
5720 POLK STREET rr.E.) (WARD 2):
MOTION by Councilman Sclhneider to waive the reading and approve the
ordinance on first rea��ing. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson.
Upon a voice vote, Councilman Schneider, Councilwoman Jorgenson,
Councilwoman Bolkcom, �ind Mayor Nee voted in favor of the motion.
Councilman Billings vot:ed against the motion. Mayor Nee declared
the motion carried by a 4 to l vote.
18. RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING HOMESTEAD TAX
TREATMENT OF PROP],RTY IN HYDE PARK BEING PURCHASED BY ANOKA
COUNTY COMMUNITY F►CTION PROGRAM, INC. (WARD 3):
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that she will be meeting with five
persons in the neighbo�rhood this Thursday at 4:00 p.m. regarding
concerns of the resider�ts in Hyde Park. She encouraged residents
to make their concerns known. She also said that she appreciated
all the information tha�t has been received.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table this item. Seconded by
Councilman Billings. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion car•ried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANIIARY 23, 1995 PAGE 14
19. APPROVE COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PLAN FOR 1175 73-1�2 AVENUE N.E.:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to approve the sign plan for 1175
73-1/2 Avenue N.E. with the following stipulations: (1) all tenant
building signage will be limited to individual letters mounted on
64 inch tall green band at top of building. White is the preferred
color; (2) letter construction to be limited to the following:
trim-cap plastic or back lit channel letters with trim-cap faces;
( 3) use of logos and colors other than white may b� allowed, if
landlord approves; (4) scale drawings of sign construction and
location on building must be approved by landlord, and City of
Fridley permits obtained before any sig�age may be installed on
site; (5) tenants using rear entrances will be limited to 8 inch
tall letters which must be installed in the area provided, centered
under individual letters reading "rear entrances." This area is
the first 20 feet of 64 inch green band at the west end of building
front; (6) tenants with front entrances will be allowed signage
centered in the area of the sign band over their store front.
Total sign area may not exceed 48: in height, leaving 8 inches of
green band at top and bottom. Each of these tenants will be
allowed 32 square feet minimum; and (7) total signage on building
front may not exceed 171 square feet. The landlord reserves the
option to assign extra area to a tenant, prflviding the total
signage does not exceed this amount. Seconded by Councilwoman
Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
20. RESOLUTION NO. 11-1995 APPROVING PLANS AND REOUESTING ANOKA
COUNTY TO PROCEED WITH IMPROVEMENTS ON EAST RIVER ROAD FROM
JANESVILLE STREET TO NORTH CITY LIMITS COUNTY S S.P. 02-601-35�.
CITY (S.A.P. 127-020-15) CITY STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO.
ST. 1995-4•
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to adopt Resolution No. 11-1995.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
21. RESOLUTION NO. 12-1995 APPROVING AND ADOPTING A DEER
POPULATION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SPRINGBROOK NATURE CENTER:
Mr. St. Clair, Natural Resources Coordinator, reported that Fridley
is experiencing the problem of overpopulation of deer at the
Springbrook Nature Center. Research studies all over the United
States indicate that deer density over twenty per square mile
damages park areas by heavy browsing. Additionally, the over-
population of deer significantly increases deer vehicle collisions
risking serious human injury or death and costs of $1, 500 to $2, 000
per collision.
Mr. St. Clair reported that Springbrook Nature Center and surroun-
ding areas have six to nine times the recommended density. He felt
that with a deer management program, problems from overpopulation
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MFsETING OF JANUARY 23, 1995 PAGE 15
could be solved. He said that this resolution adopts a deer popu-
lation management plar.i. He stated that the plan would be to
maintain the deer herd at 15 to 25 per square miles as recommended
by the Department of N,�tural Resources. It is proposed that the
deer population be m�3intained so it is compatible with the
ecosystem. He said th��t the present population would be reduced
by 20 and accomplishe�d by shooting. He informed Council and
residents that the meat would be dispensed to the food shelves and
needy families.
Mr. St. Clair said tha�t the Department of Natural Resources will
not approve removing t:he deer in a live state, as this has been
found to be ineffective and less humane. He stated that 80 percent
of the deer removed in this fashion do not survive.
Mr. St. Clair informed everyone that this Saturday there would be
a public meeting at f>pringbrook Nature Center to discuss the
problems homeowners hav�e with the deer. Information from the DNR
and methods for keeping deer away from property owners' shrubs will
also be available. HE: stated that the deer management program
would also be explained. He confirmed that this meeting will be
advertised in Focus News.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked how persons would be kept away from
the area during the shc�ot.
Mr. St. Clair replied i�hat signs would be posted, and the Nature
Center would be closed., He said Community Service Officers will
be assisting with this program. Mr. St. Clair said that he. has
spoken with other cities who have not experienced any problems.
He reiterated that safety precautions would be taken at the Nature
Center.
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 12-1995.
Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, Councilwoman
Jorgenson, Councilwoman Bolkcom, Councilman Billings, and Mayor Nee
voted in favor of the m�,otion. Councilman Schneider voted against
the motion. Mayor Nee declared the motion carried by a 4 to 1
vote.
22. MOTION TO ADVERTI��E FOR BIDS ON NEW PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT TO
BE INSTALLED AT RICE CREEK PARK:
Mr. Kirk, Director of R.ecreation and Natural Resources, requested
that Council approve th�� advertising of bids for playground equip-
ment in keeping with the plan to upgrade the Rice Creek Townhouse
area. He said that he had a positive meeting with the owner of
the townhomes who indic:ated he would be willing to contribute to
this project.
Mr. Kirk stated that t:here would be a certain amount for this
equipment, and vendor�s would be informed this is a designed
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JANIIARY 23, 1995 PAGE 16
competition to obtain the best package for the amount of money
available. He stated that once bids are received, a meeting would
be held with townhouse residents, and input would be received from
the Parks and Recreation Commission, as well as staff, for
submission to Council.
Councilman Schneider asked if the bid would include labor costs to
install the playground equipment.
Mr. Kirk replied that there would be an alternate bid for
installation.
Councilman Schneider stated that it would be great if some of the
residents could participate in installation of the equipment.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize advertising for bids
for new playground equipment for Rice Creek Park. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
23. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that there are several.items he
wished to discuss informally with Council: (1) filling the Code
Enforcement Officer position; (2) liquor operations; (3) City/HRA
loan agreement; (4) University Avenue slip-off closure; and (5)
assessment deferment policy.
7. APPROVE CONTRIBUTION TO SOUTHERN ANOKA COMMiJNITY CONSORTIUM:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that this group consists of
representatives from the cities of Fridley, Columbia Heights,
Hilltop, and the school districts. He said that the group was
organized to determine where there may be areas of cooperation to
join together and pursue common goals. Community values have been
identified, and this has resulted in various sub-committees to try
and develop programs.
Mr. Burns said that it is requested that Council approve a contri-
bution of $2,750 towards the Southern Anoka County Community
Consortium for operations in 1995. He stated that funds are also
being requested from the private sector.
Councilwoman Bolkcom said tha� the Consortium received a$20,000
grant from the University of Minnesota Extension program. She
stated that there are seven sub-committees just getting organized.
Councilman Schneider said that if communities can create an en-
vironment where youth can obtain important values, the chances of
them having problems in the future is reduced. He stated that the
Consortium v,rished to foster those values.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL �EETING OF JANOARY 23, 1995 PAGE 17
Councilwoman Jorgenson� said that it seems there is a broad base of
community support, as �� large number of citizens are participating.
Mr. Herrick, City At�torney, asked if there is a joint powers
agreement or if this is a non-profit organization. In terms of
using public funds, he wondered who was receiving the funds and who
is in charge of how th.ey are spent.
Mr. Burns replied that: it is mostly an informal group, and funds
are channeled through i�he County. He said that they have discussed
establishing their own organization, but it seems most are in favor
of funds going through the County.
Mr. Herrick stated th<�t the cities should probably have a joint
powers agreement, and the organization should become a non-profit
organization to addre:�s the question if this is a valid use of
public funds.
Mr. Burns reported that Council contributed $2,000 last year, and
the check is written to the County.
Mayor Nee stated that t:he organization has been raising funds from
private sources, and t:he same question also arose if this was a
non-profit group.
Mr. Herrick felt that •there probably should be some simple formal
agreement with the Cou�nty. He said that if funds are being given
to a group of citizens that are not organized, he probably would
have a problem with it.
Councilman Schneider said that he is comfortable with this contri-
bution, as long as the actual disbursement is to the County.
MOTION by Councilman ��chneider to authorize the contribution of
$2,750 to Anoka Count:y to be earmarked for the Southern Anoka
County Community Con:�ortium with the money taken from the
Contingency Fund. Sec:onded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a
voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to authorize the City Manager to
formalize the relations�hip between the City and Cor�nty relative to
the Southern Anoka Cc�unty Community Consortium. Seconded by
Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motiori carried unanimously.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 23. 1995 PAGE 18
ADJOURNMENT•
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adjourn the meeting. Seconded
by Councilman Schneider, Upon a voice vote, al1 voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular Meeting
of the Fridley City Council of January 23, 1995 adjourned at
10:27 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
�d � i
�� 1 � �
� � ,
{
f ` D . B fi
� i��
�•: �'`
+.s a" �
{ ,
'�' �
( ',
I '
G � ���.:
< :i
' �
i.
� .��; . . �. . - .
.. . ... ' �, � i .
.� �I . . � . - .
� ..h � ��.I ..� .
� � .. �.�.i .� .
' � I .� ... ! � . . .
{ , I
{ i
� i �
, , ,
I�
F
;,
;
; ,
�� � �. � �
{
#
,
� ;
;
(
� i
, j
� ;
� �
,
�
�'
� ,
i
_ ,
� .;,
� ;
q
�- �
. :.� � ... . .
1 i .
I
�;... . . ..:. .r �.,;. . .
� �.;, I'. �. .
(,� . � . `. � 1 .. .
{
j
1
� i
:1
. � �� �) .' . . .
lY
t. �:.: t � . .... . . .: . . ..: � . �
i � I
: � � : i
� �.;� .
A .L
� ,
� ��� �'
�� �
� �.�
� � .
���, y .
M� .
���
�
� ��.�� �
-� f �� �,
'� �� �^ ��
�°u� , .� �,,
, �` � ��'��
}1 :'�i� ` '^ � ° 4.� .
i �?� f
� 5� � 4 l�
. �. t�'� �r „�. ,�.-.' y, `�.so * a
' S � ;r : �� ., S � .
, �z: �� �t ��
'" t
` " � ���`�� '
_�� 1 � �; i �
� + � j , s
i `
� � � y 1
�i �� wy� 1
��l.i ��'' 'r� - `' .. .
i���.. �. � �` . , . .
1{
'C 4 5 �
Y � ' . . ,v�'E`
��v-�� � � � �
�
� � �i"�% _`� � -
�� ��� t t �Y
� � �� t t< � �
��,�"" �° r '
z
�� : � ���� �
�;
� � �� ��� � � � � ���r:i�
t
���„��.: � � �` �'��; � � �
�� � ` �,
a����ry� �;� � �� 1
�fAiJd i�`Y t �. ' .
t � . �
� � �
, �
�
� �. �` i�
S P " �s
� ' ��F �� � t �! . .
'��`�:� � °,�� � , ��
�
� � �'� �, � � ��
!1 � �
� ; ,
�� ;
�. � � �
�'���° ti�� � � � � � � �
� �� �� ,`
� 3 ` i
� ��
, ��'�� � � , � � � 1
� � � � � y�
,
���� �� ��,� �, � � � �
� ,
€ �;���, � <
�.
'1 `�
1 j
;
� �
�� � � t ��,
�� t
� � �.
i�
� � � s� �
��. r �� �
� a �- � ° � . "��� ` � �
�� � *� � i �� � �
�
�
y � 1
��� , _ .'.,�. :�` �_ ��� ; � P»� �'�
��
� 4
` 5`
; ' i �
a� e �
�
�� � f� '�� .-�'
y � �j:. �'� yT � , ,
� }
�x ur ��9'� ? �, °��.
r a �� K � ���� �����
�� k. ���'fi "� g.�,.3R '�4A*�kY
��` `.. 'z�"�� �it " .
� � :. ��X�`' � . . �
� � t
� .., ..,�s . . _ . � aL'� ... . �
I
I
�
��
�
l
r �
�
I
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
Community Development Department
PL�NG Drv�SION
City of Fridley
February 9, 1995
William Burns, City Manager ���
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Consider� Second Reading of an Ordinance Under
Section 12.06 of the Fridley City Charter
Declarin,g Certain Real Estate to be Surplus and
Authorizing the Sale Thereof
The City Charter requir�es that the sale of all public lands occur
via ordinance. Staff h.as prepared for the City Council's review
and approval an ordinan�ce to declare the south 35 feet of Lot 3,
Block 2, Sexter Additio�n excess, and thereby authorize the sale
thereof. The first rea.ding was approved on January 23, 1995.
Staff recommends that t.he City Council approve the ordinance as
submitted.
SH/
M-95-91
1.01
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE IJNDER SECTION 12.06 OF THE CITY
CHARTER DECLARING CERTAIN REAL ESTATE TO BE
SIIRPLIIS AND AIITHORIZING THL SALE THEREOF
The City Council of the City of Fridley does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. The City of Fridley is the fee owner of the tract
of land within the City of Fridley, Anoka County,
State of Minnesota, described as follows:
The South 35 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, Sexter
Addition, City of Fridley, Anoka County,
Minnesota.
SECTION 2. It is hereby determined by the City Council that
the City no longer has any reason to continue to
own said property, and the City is hereby
authorized to sell or enter into a contract to
sell said property.
SECTION 3. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to
sign the necessary contracts and deeds to affect
the sale of said property.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
THIS DAY OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA, CITY CLERK
Public Hearing:
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
January 9, 1995
January 23, 1995
1.02
CITY OF FRIDLEY
PLANNING COMM.ISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 1� 1995
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Newman called the February 1, 1995, Planning
Commission meeting to o�rder at 7:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present: Dav�e Newman, LeRoy Oquist, Diane Savage,
Dea.n Saba
Members Absent: Dav�e Iiondrick, Br�d Sielaff, Connie Modig
others Present: Baz�b Dacy, Community Development Director
Scc>tt Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Ce2�nn Haluptzok, 254 - 96th Lane N.E.,�
Blaine, Minnesota
APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 14�, 1994 PLANNING COMMISSION_MINUTES:
MOTION by Mr. Saba, sec;onded by Mr. Oquist, to approve the
December 14, 1994, Plarining Commission minutes as written.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINAI�IIMOIISLY.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, :�econded by Mr. Saba, to approve the
agenda.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANTIMOIISLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: c^ONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP
#94-19 , BY JOHN L1:JND:
Per Section 205.1'7.O1.C.(9) of the Fridley City Code, to
allow an automotive repair garage in an M-1, Light
Industrial zoning district on Lot 1, Block 1, Central View
Manor 3rd Additio�n, generally located at 1175-81 - 73 1/2
Avenue N.E.
Mr. Hickok stated the ;petitioner had withdrawn the request.
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SP
#94-20, BY JOHN WUCHKO OF MAACO AUTO PAINTING AND BODYWORKS:
Per Section 205.18.O1.C.(12) of the Fridley City Code, to
allow outdoor storage of materials and equipment, on Lot 2,
Blocic 4, Commerce Park, generally located at 148 Osborne
Road N.E. This request is due to a transfer of ownership.
2.01
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRUARY 1, 1995 PAGE 2
The existing use (MAACO Auto Painting and Bodyworks) will
not change.
MOTION by Ms. Savage, seconded by Mr. Saba, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and to open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:37 P.M.
Mr. Hickok stated the request for a special use permit is being
made by MAACO Auto Body for the site at 148 Osborne Road. In
reviewing the request, staff discovered that MAACO is in
existence today and has just recently changed.ownership. Based
on a stipulation from May, 1990, early discussions with the new
owner.were that they would co�e back through the special use
permit process. The stipulation referred to reads as follows:
4. This special use permit applied solely to MAACO Auto
Painting and Bodyworks. This special use permit cannot be
transferred to a future tenant without the approval o€ the
Planning Commission and City Council.
Mr. Hickok stated the original owner is no longer the owner of
MAACO. Mr. John Wuchko has taken over ownership. We discussed
with Mr. Wuchko the intentions for the site which will remain as
MAACO. The name and operation will stay the same. The original
screening area, landscaping and stipulations that applied to the
first property still apply. After further review, staff believed
that this did not need special use permit review. If it is the
Planning Commission's wish, staff will remove this from the
agenda before it gets to the City Council and refund the special
use permit fee. In retrospect, if staff had known the history at
the time of application, staff would have explained to the
petitioner they did not need a special use permit because they
are not changing names.
Mr. Newman asked if the Planning Commission would run the risk of
the City Council second guessing their judgment.
Mr. Hickok stated he did not think so. He got a second opinion
from the city attorney�s office who concurs with staff's opinion.
Mr. Oquist asked if the rationale is that the business is still
MAACO and the only difference is there is a different owner.
When the business changes from MAACO to a different business or
different use, this would need to be reviewed.
Mr. Hickok stated this was correct.
Mr. Saba stated he saw no problem in approving with the
understanding that this only needs to come back before the
2a0`
PLANNING COMMI3SION MEE�TING, FEBRIIARY 1, 1995 PAGE 3
Planning Commission if the use or the name changes.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, sec:onded by Ms. Savage, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:40 P.M.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, sec:onded by Mr. Oquist, to concur with staff
recommendation that it is not necessary for the Planning
Commission to take acti.on; but in the alternative, if the City
Council does want to ta.ke action, we would recommend approval
with the following sti��ulations:
1. Vinyl slats shall be installed for screening purposes.
2. The fence shall be: no higher than 8 feet tall as outlined by
the Zoning Code.
3. The sod shall be r�emoved and replaced with class 5 gravel
and a liner or bar�rier to protect the ground from leakage.
4. This special use p�ermit applies solely to MAACO Auto
Painting and Bodyw�orks. In the future, the special use
permit does not ne.ed to be reviewed by the Planning
Commission unless both the tenant and the name under which
they do business c.hange.
UPON � VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CIiAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNAN'IMOUSLY.
3. VACATION REQUEST, SAV #94-04, BY CEANN HALUPTZOK:
To vacate a small portion of a drainage and utility easement
on the south property line of Lot 7, Block 2, Blomberg
Estates, in order to correct a garage encroachment,
generally located at 7580 Brigadoon Place N.E.
Mr. Hickok stated the request is to vacate a portion of an
easement along the southern property line at 7580 Brigadoon
Place. The house was constructed in a manner that the garage
encroaches 6 inches over the 10-foot utility easement along the
southern portion of the lot. This was not identified as an issue
at the time of construction. When the survey came in, it
indicated the structure would be 10 feet from the lot line.
Sometime between the approval and construction, the foundation
went over the line. The petitioner has discussed this with
staff. Staff has discussed this with the Engineering Department
and determined the favored option would be to sign a hold
harmless agreement to release the City from responsibility in the
event crews must get in to do work. It was the petitioner's
choice to have that portion of the easement where the home sits
2.03
PLANNING COMMI3SION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 1, 1995 PAGE 4
vacated. In discussing this further with the Engineering staff,
staff did an analysis to see if there was anything below that
easement to determine the risk. There is an 18-inch storm sewer
that runs down the easement. There is also an 8-inch sanitary
sewer line but not in the same easement which reduces the risk
somewhat. The Engineering staff would be comfortable with the
vacation of this portion because the encroachment is only 6
inches.
Mr. Hickok stated staff are requesting a legal description of the
vacated area be submitted before the request goes before the City
Council. This will allow staff to more easily identify where the
vacated easement is located. Staff recommends approval of the
request with the following stipulations:
1. A legal description of the area to be vacated shall be
submitted to the City prior to recording the vacation at
Anoka County.
2. Verification of utility locations and acknowledgement of
intent to vacate shall be documented, with copies submitted
to the City, prior to recording this vacation with the Anoka
County Recorder's Office.
Mr. Saba asked, if the easement is vacated, what could happen if
the City must dig along the sewer and it undermines the
foundation to the garage.
Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner was concerned about that, but as
long as it was only 6 inches or less, staff felt they could work
around that. The vacation is only along the length of the garage
foundation.
Mr. Saba asked if the City felt comfortable without a hold
harmless agreement.
Mr. Hickok stated he thought the vacation is the next step and,
in lieu of the hold harmless agreement, it is the next
alternative.
Mr. Newman asked what utilities are there and at what depth are
they located.
Mr. Hickok stated there is an 18-inch storm sewer about 5 feet
below the surface.
Ms. Haluptzok provided Mr. Hickok with the legal description as
requested in stipulation #1. She had no additional comments.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Savage, to recommend to the
City Council approval of Vacation Request, SAV #94-04, by Ceann
2.04
PLANNING COMMISSION MENTING, F88ROARY 1. 1995 __ ____ PAGE 5
Haluptzok, to vacate a small portion of a drainage and utility
easement on the south ��roperty line of Lot 7, Block 2, Blomberg
Estates, in order to correct a garage encroachment, generally
located at 7580 Brigadc�on Place N.E., with the following
stipulations:
1. A legal description of the area to be vacated shall be
submitted to the t:ity prior to recording the vacation at
Anoka County.
2. Verification of ul.ility locations and acknowledgement of
' intent to vacate .shall be documented, with copies submitted
to the City, prio�- to recording this vacation with the Anoka
County Recorder's Office.
Mr. Newman expressed concern about the precedent the Planning
Commission might be set:ting. However, the Commission has taken
into consideration the depth of the existing utilities, the
amount of slope and amount of work area needed to service the
utilities, the fact th��t the amount being requested is
substantially less than one foot and limited only to the actual
area of encroachment wYiich is the length of the garage foundation
and not the entire lenc�th of the lot.
OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINAZJIMOII3LY.
Mr. Hickok stated the t:ity Council would review this request at
their February 13th meE�ting.
4. CONSIDER RESOLUTION FOR EXPANDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA, AND CREATINC� TIF DISTRICT #13
Ms. Dacy stated State ]Law requires that the Planning Commission
evaluate expansion of �i redevelopment area and the creation of a
TIF district before thE: City Council holds a public hearing and
gives subsequent appro�ial. The Planning Commission is to review
the consistency betweeri the Comprehensive Plan and what the
proposed TIF district and redevelopment area is to accomplish.
Ms. Dacy stated the Cit:y has worked hard on the Southwest
Quadrant. Recently, the City Council and the HRA directed staff
to initiate the proces:� to expand the project area to include the
apartment buildings anci relocate the tenants in order to enlarge
the site and maximize t:he value of the development.
Ms. Dacy stated she went through the Comprehensive Plan and
identified pertinent p�irts. She recammends the Planning
Commission approve the expansion because, in her findings, it is
consistent with some oi= the goals established in the
Comprehensive Plan. TYiere is no specific reference to the
2.05
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 1, 1995 PAGE 6
Southwest Quadrant or the downtown redevelopment effort in the
Plan, but there are portions that match what the City Council and
the HRA are trying to do. The Planning Commission must pass a
resolution, a copy of which was included in the agenda packet.
The chairperson would be asked to sign the original resolution,
if approved.
Ms. Dacy reviewed the concept plan for the Southwest Quadrant.
The developer, Rottlund Homes, is proposing three types of
housing - single family detached townhomes, attached townhomes,
and two senior condominium buildings. The single detached
townhomes look like single family homes but the maintenance is
provided by the association. These w.ould be constructed where
the apartment buildings currently exist. The concept plan
indicates 26 of these units would be constructed. In the middle
would be medium density, attached townhomes with three stories.
The first story would be the garage with two floors of living
space above. There would be 16 units per building. The senior
condominium buildings would be located near the intersection of
Mississippi and University, would be four stories tall, each with
underground parking and each with 24 units. These would be owner
occupied. There is a pedestrian open space. The stormwater pond
is an amenity at the core of the site to provide pedestrian space
and a trail.
Ms. Dacy stated, when looking for a developer, the City Council
and HRA looked at the site plans, the design guidelines, and
whether the developer could produce a product for the
marketplace. When selecting a developer for the site, Rottlund
Homes was selected based on more than just the design guidelines.
Mr. Saba asked if there had been discussion about a walkway
across University Avenue.
Ms. Dacy stated yes, this was discussed but the developer did not
say they would make the connection. They did acknowledge the
senior buildings were four stories and there could be a
connection for a skyway. The developer is aware that we want
that connection.
Ms. Dacy staied, at the corner of Mississippi and University, the
City Council asked the developer to come up with a public
feature. They came up with a park-like space coming into the
area.
Ms. Dacy stated the City of Hopkins had an "Adopt-A-Brick"
program. This may be an approach for fundraising.
Ms. Savage asked how far south the development would go.
Ms. Dacy stated the development would go as far south as
2.06
�
PLANNING COMMISSION ME�TING. FEBRUARY 1. 1995 PAGE 7
Satellite Lane.
MOTION by Ms. Savage, :�econded by Mr. Saba, to approve Resolution
No. 1- 1995 of the Fr:idley Planning Commission, Finding the
Modification to the Rec�evelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project
No. 1 to be Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEiqMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOOSLY.
Mr. Newman stated he thought the redevelopment would be
successful. He liked i�he detached townhomes and the
condominiums, and thouqht they looked attractive. He has
concerns however about the attached townhomes. They look very
small and felt they wotxld be worth about $70,000.
Ms. Dacy stated the de�reloper are agreed to a minimum market
value of $90,000.
Mr. Newman thought that: was good. With 16 units back to back,
there is a lot of mass and a lot of the units will be dark. He
is concerned about the market value in 10 to 15 years. He is
disappointed in the ciz-culation and the traffic route. It looks
like they took one herE: and one there.
Ms. Dacy reviewed the proposed hearing process. Because of the
size and importance of the development, the Planning Commission
chair has requested the� Commission have two meetings. Staff have
identified the regular Planning meetings for March are on the lst
and 15th. Staff would like the Planning Commission to hold a
special meeting on Marc;h 29. If that is the first of the two
meetings, the next regular meeting is April 5. If there are
comments expressed on Niarch 29 that staff would need to follow up
on and develop changes, there could be another special meeting on
April 12 or they could wait until the regular meeting on April
19. This will be deperident on the amount of time the Planning
Commission wants to de��ote to this not knowing what the regular
agenda will be.
Mr. Newman asked if the: Commission was comfortable with the
process for holding twc► meetings.
Mr. Saba stated the Cit:y needs to do a good job upfront so he
thought the Planning Cc>mmission must take the time.
Mr. Newman stated the more time the Commission can give staff,
the better. He request:ed the Commission plan to meet on March 29
and then on April 19.
Ms. Dacy stated there i.s another issue to be considered. The
liquor store is making money and doing very well. The City
2.07
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, FEBROARY 1, 1995 PAGE 8
Council wants to keep the liquor store and authorized staff to
pursue another location. She anticipates controversy regarding
the relocation of this business.
Ms. Dacy reviewed the schedule and where staff are in the
process. Staff hope to have everything done so they can transfer
the property on August 1.
5. CONSIDER 1995 CDBG ALLOCATION
Ms. Dacy stated the Human Resource Commission did not meet in
January. Staff are proposing the same type of split in the
appropriations as last year -$25,000 for the Human Resources
Commission to disburse to eligible agencies, $2,500 for the ACCAP
Senior Outreach Worker, and $2,500 for the Fridley Senior Home
Companion Program. The Human Resources Commission will at their
next meeting decide what to do with re-allocated funds.
According to the process, the Planning Commission is to sign off
on this.
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, seconded by Ms. Savage, to concur with the
proposed disposition -$25,000 for the Human Resources Commission
to disburse to eligible agencies, $2,500 for the ACCAP Senior
Outreach Worker, and $2,500 for the Fridley Senior Home Companion
Program - subject to approval by the Human Resources Commission.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CIiAIRPER80N NEwMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOIISLY.
6. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY & ENERGY
COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15. 1994
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Oquist, to receive the
Environmental Quality & Energy Commission minutes of November 15,
1994.
UPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL VOTING AY$� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOU3LY.
7. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEETING OF DECEMBER 5, 1994
MOTION by Mr. Mr. Saba, seconded by Ms. Savage, to receive the
Parks and Recreation Commission minutes of December 5, 1994.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CIiAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTAORITY
MEETING OF DECEMBER 20, 1994
2.�8
PLANNING COMMISSION MEEITING FEBRIIARY 1 1995 PAGE 9
MOTION by Mr. Saba, sec:onded by Ms. Savage, to receive the
Housing & Redevelopment. Authority minutes of December 20, 1994.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPER80N NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANfIMOIISLY.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Mr. Oquist, �;econded by Mr. Saba, to adjourn the
meeting.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPLRSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE FEBRIIARY 1� 1995, PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8i15 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Lavonn Cooper
Recording Secretary
2.09
r �
�
I
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
Comm.unity Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
February 8, 7.995
City of Fridley
William Burnsc, City Manager ���
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Request to e�ctablish a public hearing to vacate a
portion of trie easement at 7580 Brigadoon Place N.E. in
order to corx-ect a garage encroachment.
While having title worl?; done on their home, the residents at 7580
Brigadoon Place N.E. discovered that their garage had been
constructed approximate:ly 6" over a drainage and utility easement
that exists on their sc>uth property line. Staff discussed a hold
harmless agreement as ai possible solution to this encroachment.
The homeowners opted.to pursue a vacation of the portion of the
easement that exists be:low the foundation.
The City's engineering staff determined that there is an 18"
storm sewer pipe appro�;:imately 5' below the surface. The hold
harmless option was suc�gested once again by the engineering
staff. As an alternati.ve, the engineering staff stated they
would be in agreement �rith vacation of onlv the 6"(+/-) along the
length of the garage.
PLANNING COMMISSION RFC:OMMENDATION:
The Planning Commissiori concurred with staff's recommendation to
approve the request by Ceann Haluptzok to vacate that portion of
the Easement over Lot 7', Block 2, Blomberg Estates, affected by
the existing garage enc:roachment subject to the following
stipulations:
1. A legal descY�iption of the area to be vacated shall be
submitted to the City prior to recording the vacation
at Anoka Courity .
2. Verification of utility locations and acknowledgement
of intent to vacate shall be documented, with copies
submitted to the City, prior to recording this vacation
with the Anok:a County Recorder's Office.
The Commission did expY�ess concern about setting a precedence and
asked that the minutes reflect that concern and recognition that
Haluptzok
February 8, 1995
PAGE 2
if this request had been made for an area larger than the 6"+/-
they would not support such a vacation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council establish February 27,
1995 as the public hearing date to consider this item.
3.02
�
� �;��
;
-� - _ . _.
1500
� " � � �� � � I (�)
1586
]578 I u=1
(H1
(�1 � ��� i�) i�) �
� u� �
7E�1 76l0
7651 �p C �+ ) ( us �
t�ul (tn)
� �ao
�r � c �_ � c +� �
c+�� cr��
?6�5 76Z8 (�) (�1
(r:a� ��u�
7613 7614 ���) i�f
( ut ) ( tt+ )
l�) � ��� (��
�
t �) 0 7581 7574
� ( +� 1 i � ): : �
-�, ..�
7563 (�) � ��n1 �7�f0� �°
75Y
l�) �
a>
b
� ��
( tu � ?S�il 7531 .s�
? �
(7u 7� � ( u ) l N ) ��� ,�
���)
i 1��
7J"�l (7Nj�) i532 � �
� ui ) (�o� � (�u � t s� 1
(�l (�1 (�1 (�1 l�) (�l (�)
7645
( 4� )
SAV 4�94-04
Ceann Haluptzok
�4
( u ) �1�6�
7G29
i�)
� � �
(�l lu) Inl
76th Avenue NE.
?591 1fi20 1640
(JS) ist) t��)
!�) ��� �
7�9 ( u�)
�u�
7547 ���
i��)
t�l
( �) �
( ii J
��' (�
?513 7512
(�1 ���
i �) i �j
I
�8 16
cj�� ci
t�)
75�i
(n1
l�)
w (�)
2
a
-� ���
r�a
� � i
� �N� i
� �
��s)
i �1 '
1�i5 �61
(4�j (4�
The property owner of 7580 Briga.doon Place N.E. has requested to vacate a small portion of the
drainage and utility easement a1on�; the south side of their property. If approved, this will vacate
the portion of the easement where the garage encroaches. ;
.. ___._.
I
_ _--- ------._ .
�
• � : L�4CATION MAP
�
SAV ��94-04
Ceann Haluptzok
� \.
- . .
. \� ' ` (
� �.
7
' • i �
i
� .� L f�. � �: .; ; ,L -
- . _ _ i
-_�, �37.1 � - '
` ' � c� z `�
tl% `�? ,�L � � ✓�.�`, � _ � ?��`' ,(7
i
i � w . y_ ��� `'f -`>
�r� � Zlo.� _ - - - �-t.4r= -- - _ _ :. _
� � � 3 � .
� � y W ^v
Z v
� � Y � _,
^ �� G � � � �
V O � J . / ` � .� �°� r-...' O ` n \ Op / 4-•-
- � � 'l _.. - � �1 ; � Lr' < G ; --r -- - - � - _ -- — � `� � ,
. � , U C� -�` � �' r 4 � �� ,
' � � � , � — ;�.a -r `f� � � � •.n
!� �;� ? ' � _ Q ,- - n ��:
� � � �]-- � ----- � ..
� � _- - � "
� ?c
,-.
�O ��X �' ; - $iTUM tN0 S ;
W - � � � � �'
. , �s . . ^ � � ; 1.» �lL
, , ` ' ', f � S ` fj - -•.t .
� �v � � V
�c ,
, --- --- ._._ , - - z � ? - _
� ' ASEMENT �V. - . - -- _ -- =
. --- � � � �
; -
- - -_ �3
: 'O _�c! ; z �
: -�
�_
i ` -7 r
C �
►�,�r� � assume�.
� �C� U 7'1'1 �'t'�� .
3.04
ENLARGED VIEW OF ENCROACHMENT
r _
�
I
Comm.unity Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 8, :L995 L
�(Y
TO: William W. Biirns, City Manager �
FROM:
SUBJECT:
REQOEST•
Barbara Dacy,, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok,, Planning Coordinator
Consideratio�z of a Special Use Permit for MAACO Auto
Painting and Bodyworks
John Wuchko, has reque:sted consideration of a special use permit
in accordance with Cod+e Section 205.18.01.C.12 to allow exterior
storage of materials, �and equipment.
The special use permit provision in the
zoning district allow �exterior storage
with certain considera�tions.
BACRGROIIND•
M-2, General Industrial
of materials and equipment
On May 15, 1990, Phillip Leffel, Leffel Incorporated, dba MAACO
Painting and Bodyworks applied for a special use permit for this
site. The City Council officially approved the request with 4
stipulations. These stipulations were:
1. Vinyl slats shall be installed for screening purposes.
2. The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall as
outlined by the Zoning Code.
3. The sod shall be removed and replaced with class 5
gravel and a liner or barrier to protect the ground
from leakage.
4. This special use permit applies solely to 1YsAACO Auto
Painting and Bodyworks. This special use permit cannot
be transferred to a future tenant without the approval
of the Planninq Coma�ission and City Council
You will note that stipulation number 4 refers to a future tenant
other than MAACO Auto Painting and Bodyworks. Though Mr. Leffel
is no longer doing business as MAACO Painting and Bodyworks, Mr.
Wuchko is retaining the MAACO Painting and Bodyworks name.
RECOMMENDATION:
Due to the language
Planning Commission
however, staff subm
fnr concurrence.
of' the 1990 permit, staff recommended that
an�d City Council review was not warranted;
MAACO
February 8, 1995
PAGE TWO
Council Agenda for information and for review if the City Council
desires to have the item reviewed further. Staff there.fore
scheduled the item as a"consent" item in order to avoid a
lengthy discussion at the meeting. If there is no objection,
reimbursement of the fee is also in order.
SH/
M-95-92
' 4.02
� _
�
�
�S TAFF REP O RT
Community Development Department
APPLICATION NIIMBER:
Appeals Co;nmission Datc
Planning Coininission Date : February 1, 1995
City Council Date : February 13, 1995
Special Use Permit, SP #94-20
PETITIONER:
John A. Wuchko, MAACO
LOCATION'
148 Osborne Road N.E.
REOOEST•
John Wuchko, has reque:ated consideration of a special use permit
in accordance with CodEa Section 205.18.O1.C.12 to allow exterior
storage of materials, <�nd equipment.
The special use permit provision in the M-2, General Industrial
zoning district allow E.xterior storage of materials and equipment
with certain consideraitions.
On May 15, 1990, Phill:ip Leffel, Leffel Incorporated, dba MAACO
Painting and Bodyworks applied for a special use permit for this
site. The City Council officially approved the request with 4
stipulations. These sitipulations were:
1. Vinyl slats :shall be installed for screening purposes.
2. The-fence sh<�11 be no higher than 8 feet tall as
outlined by ithe Zoning Code.
3. The sod sha1:L be removed and replaced with class 5
gravel and a liner or barrier to protect the ground
from leakage..
4. This special use permit applies solely to MAACO Auto
Paintinq and Bodyworks. This special use permit cannot
be transferr�d to a future tenant without the approval
of the Plann:inq Commission and Citp Council
You will note that sti��ulation number 4 refers to a future tenant
other than MAACO Auto ]Painting and Bodyworks. Though Mr. Leffel
is no longer doing bus:iness as MAACO Paintinq and Bodyworks, Mr.
Wuchko is retaining th�� MAACO Painting and Bodyworks name.
� �_-
MAACO Painting and Bodyworks
Staff Report
PAGE 2
RECOMMENDATION:
Due to the language of the 1990 permit, staff recommended that
Planning Commission and City Council review was not warranted;
however, staff submitted our findings to the Planning Commission
for concurrence.
PLANNING COMMI88ION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission concurred with staff's recommendation.
The Commission did ask however, that this item appear on the City
Council Agenda for information and for review if the City Council
desires to have the item reviewed further. Staff therefore
scheduled the item as a"consent" item in order to avoid a
lengthy discussion at the meeting. If there is no objection,
reimbursement of the fee is also in order.
SH/
4.04
SP ��94-20
i1AAC0
The petitioner has requestecl the issuance of a Special Use Permit to a11ow outdoor storage
of materials and equipment, on Lot 2 Block 4, Commerce Park, generally located at 148 �
Osborne Road N.E.
N
� LQCATION MAP ����;
�� SP �i94-20
� � P1AAC0
( -
1
�
.
i
�
�
,
1
�
1
�
i
O�,
�O
. � 9,1,
�9
C �9
0
� -
� -�-�, -
' �
�---,
.�
� �
L
" � -•—
r'_'�
i �� • .
, L�
�
K • �
. � m x
O � �
�� y p � � � --
S 0
^' �n T
s � z
�
• �__�
L
� _---� •
� /�'��4!-}GO
_ � �
i91,cT'�
o < �.oPe��
� �Y���-
� g P�19-
� - -- -
�,. - �.� � � �.�.. �...�.
4.07
SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 20� 1990 PAGE 11
Ms. Dacy stated staff, along with Darrel Clark, the Chief Building
Official, can discuss the storage addition with the petitioner..
Mr. Kramer stated he would be willing to table the special use
permit request as long as he can clean u� the area, but not
eliminate everything until they arrive at a more permanent
solution.
Ms. Sherek stated her biggest con rn is that the petitioner can
have the best intentions of res ing the issue by cleaning up the
storage area and putting eve thing in back. By having a fence
which might encourage more ndalism, she can see everything coming
back out front again, a that is not a solution to this storage
problem. She would 1' e to see the petitioner explore the option
of a storage addit' with staff.
MOTION by Mr. aba, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to table special use
permit, SP 0-08, by John Babinski, to give the petitioner and
staff an pportunity to discuss the possibility of a storage
buildi addition.
A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE,:CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP
�90-09, BY LEFFEL INCORPORATED FOR MAACO AUTO PAINTING AND
BODYWORKS•
Per Section 205.18.O1.C.(12) of the Fridley City Code to allow
exterior storage of materials and equipment on Lot 2, Block
4, Commerce Park, and that.part of Lot 2 lying in Section 10-
30-24, subject to utility and gas easements as shown on plat
and subject to any other easements of record, generally
located at 100 Osborne Road N.E.
MOTION by Mr. Kuechle, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTYON CARRIED AND THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 8:40 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated this property is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial,
with adjacent M-2 zoning on the north, east, and south sides of the
property. There is commercial and residential zoning to the west
of the property across the railroad tracks.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioner is requesting a special use
permit in order to construct a fenced storage area directly outside
the tenant stall of this multi-tenant building. The petitioner has
a contract with Shorty' s Towing, which has a contract with the City
of Fridley, to tow accident vehicles from accident sites to various
� � .
PLANNING COMMISSION MEE7['ING, JUNE 20t 1990 PAGE 12
storage areas. The Ma�co site would act as a satellite storage
area for Shorty's Towing.
Ms. McPherson stated thE� storage area needs to be a secured area;
therefore, the petitionE�r is proposing a chain link fence to fence
a 48 ft. x 80 ft. area adjacent to the southeast wall of the
building, which is adjacent to Maaco's tenant stall. Currently,
the area proposed to be� fenced is a green area. The petitioner
would not construct a cu.rbcut, but would use a wood ramp to access
the storage area.
Ms. McPherson stated that while this area is not highly visible
fr:om any public right-c�f-way, staff is still reco�mending that
appropriate screening be required if the Planning Commission
recommends approval of t:he special use permit.
Ms. McPherson stated that since the proposed storage area is
relatively small and is not highly visible from the public right-
of-way, staff recommends the Planning Commission recom�-�end approval
of the special use permi�t to allow the exterior storage of vehicles
and equipment with the f�ollowing two stipulations:
l. Vinyl slats sriall be installed for screening purposes.
2. The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall as outl.inec
by the Zoning Code.
Mr. Saba stated he would be concerned about accident vehicles
stored on a grassy area wfiere there is the potential for oil anc
antifreeze to leak into the ground.
Mr. Dahlberg agreed.
Mr. Phillip Leffel stated the vehicles that will be stored in this
area are less severely damaged and l.ess likely to be totalled b�
insurance companies. ThE� reason Maaco is contracting with Shorty's
is because Maaco will have a better opportunity to acquire the
repair work on these vehicles. If a vehicle is not repairable, it
will not be brought to this site. Generally, the only leakage fro;..
a damaged vehicle is radiator leakage; and the vehicles are pretty
dry by the time they reach the storage location.
Mr. Saba stated he would feel better if at least part of the area
was a hard surface area for those vehicles that might be leakinc
or appear to be leaking contaminants.
Mr. Leffel stated he could look into the possibility o:
blacktopping the area w�.th the owner of the property. He statew
that based on the experi��nce of other Maaco centers that have done
this, they average about 4 vehicles a month, so there would not be
very many vehicles on the site at one time.
4.09
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 20 1990 PAGE 13
Mr. Dahlberg asked if Maaco stores vehicles to use for parts for
repairing vehicles.
Mr. Leffel stated they do not do that. They are primarily a
production and painting facility and deal with other people k�o
supply the needed parts.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that if it is acceptable by the owner of the
property to blacktop the storage area, the owner may not feel the
need for the petitioner to return the storage area to grass,
because another tenant might have a need for a blacktopped storage
area.
Mr: Kuechle stated he did not think a blacktopped area would do
what they want it to, and that is to contain any lea�ing
contaminants, such as oil and gasoline. Most of those are solvents
and they wouZd either soak into the blacktop, or insufficient
quantities go through the blacktop. So, he was not sure this is
a valid reason t� ask the petitioner to blacktop the area.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that a blacktopped surface might be an
advantage to Maaco. With tow trucks coming in and out, the sod
area will get worn down rather quickly and it will be dirt and nud
when it rains.
Ms. Sherek stated the City of Fridley has a standard that they
require parked vehicles to be stored on hard surface areas.
Ms. Dacy stated Ms. Sherek is correct; however, an alternative
would be to excavate the sod now, put down a plastic covering, and
put in class 5 or crushed rock. That would make it easier for the
property owrier to re-establish the sod.
Ms. Sherek asked if classified rock is an acceptable surface for
storing vehicles.
Ms. Sherek stated that, as Mr. Dahlberg had stated, the grassy area
will soon be worn down, and it is going to be a mess in a v2ry
short time. The City requires homeowners to store vehicles on hard
surface areas, and she did not think the City should allow a
business to create a parking lot that is not a hard surface area.
It is creating a substandard space that could be a contamination
problem in the future.
Mr. Leffel stated he had no idea of the cost of blacktopping the
area. If it is very costly, it might not be feasible for hir_ to
proceed.
Mr. Saba stated he could accept the alternative of class 5 or
crushed rock with a plastic covering under the rock. Tne cost
would be significantly less. If the Commission is agreea�le, he
4.1-0
t
PLANNING COMMISSION MEE'CING JIINE 20 1990
PAGE 14
would recommend anothe�r stipulation that the sod surface be
excavated, lined with plastic and coated with class 5 gravel.
Mr. Dahlberg stated that if this is done, he would recommend the
petitioner remove a pori�ion of the curb so the petitioner does not
have to use a wooden ramp.
MOTION by Mr. Dahlberg, seconded by Ms. Sherek, to close the public
hearing.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 9:00 P.M.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, sec;onded by Ms. Sherek, to recommend to City
Council approval of s;pecial use permit, SP #90-09, by Leffel
Incorporated for Maaco Auto Painting and .Bodyworks, per Section
205.18.O1.C.(12) of the Fridley City Code to allow exterior storaqe
of materials and equiprnent on Lot 2, Block 4, Commerce Park, and
that part of Lot 2 lyi�ng in Section 10-30-24, subject t� utility
and gas easements as shown on plat and subject to any other
easements of record, g��nerally located at 100 Osborne Road N.E.,
with the following stipulations:
1.
2.
3.
Vinyl slats :�hall be installed for screening purposes.
The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall as outlined
by the Zoninq Code.
The sod be re�moved and replaced with class 5 gravel with
some type of liner or barrier between the gravel and the
ground to prc�tect the ground from leakage.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALI:, VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINA]NIMOIISLY.
Ms. McPherson stated tlhis item will go to City Council on July 9,
1990.
4. REVIECa HUMAN RESOLJRCES COP+II�IISSION RECONII�IENDATION ON CONIlKtJNITY'
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG1 HUP4AN SERVICE GRANTS:
MOTION by Mr. Saba, sec:onded by Mr. Kuechle, to ac�� and approve
the recommendations ma�3e by the Human Resources�Commission on CDBG
Human Service grants and recommend appro�v-�bY the City Council.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING
THE MOTION CARRIED UNA.NIMOU&I�C:
5.
MIPdUTES :
; CHAIRPERSON BETZOLD DECLARED
'4.11
I �
�
unroF
FRl DLEY
CO1�a.MUNITY DEVELC,��'l�l[ENT
-� �,
DEPARTMENT
(�� � � . �
DATE: June 28, 1990 !�'
�..
�..
TO: William Burns, City Manager;�'
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Jock Robertson, Community Development Director
Barbara Dacy, Planning Coordinator
P4ichele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Special Use Permit, SP #90-09, by Phillip
Leffel
Attached is the staff report for the above-referenced special use
permit. The special use permit, if approved, would allow outside
storage of materials and equipment at 100 Osborne Road N.E. The
Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the
request to the City Council with the follo�aing stipulations:
1.
2.
Vinyl slats shall be installed for screening purposes.
The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall.
3. The storage area shall be excavated, lined with plastic, and
6 inches of class 5 material shall be installed.
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Planning
Commission action and approve the special use permit request.
MM/dn
M-90-445
4.12
i301
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JIILY 9 1990 PAGE 1#
Mr. Flora, Public Works Director, stated that the plan provides
guidance and any particular item in the plan would come to the
Council for appropriate approval.
Councilman Billings stated that if approving this capital
improvement plan only p�_ovides a vote of confidence with this
program, he would prefer to wait until the 1991 budget is adopted.
Mr. Flora stated that he cioes not feel there is a pressing need for
the 1991-1995 programs. He stated that;��he 1990 plan reflects a
number of changes the Council approved that are not in the 1990
budget. He stated that �the plan does provide guidance for staff
on where to focus their a�ctivitie�
Mr. Burns, City Manager, :�tate�l�that this is just a conceptual plan
and is not an appropriati��n m�asure. He stated that if the Council
has approved specific plan supplemental appropriations have been
submitted. i -
/
Councilman Biliings /stat:ed that as long as the Council is not
permanently lockeci/into �Lt, he is comfortable approving the plan..
Councilman Schneider st��ted that his concern was if this plan
overrode the:%budget in :�ome way and as long as this is not the
case, he would have no p��oblem with it.
MOTION/by Councilman Fit:.patrick to approve the 1990-1995 Capital
Improvement Plan. Seconcled by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
u�animously.
/
13. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE
10, 1990•
A.. SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP #90-09, BY LEFFEL INCORPORATED FOR
MAACO AUTO PAINTING AND BODYWORKS TO ALLOW EXTERIOR STORAGE
OF MATERIALS AND E4�UIPMENT ON LOT 2 BLOCK 4 COMMERCE PARK,
AND THAT PART OF LO'I' 2 LYING IN SECTION 10-30-24 SUBJECT TO
UTILITY AND GAS EASI�MENTS AS SHOWN ON PLAT AND SUBJECT TO ANY
OTHER EASEMENTS OF RECORD GENERALLY IACATED AT 100 OSBORNE
ROAD N.E.-
Ms. Dacy, Planning Coordinator, stated that this is a request for
a special use permit to �illow the petitioner to construct a fenced
storage area for the out:side storage of cars related to the auto
painting and bodyworks fa�cility. She stated that staff recommended
that the outdoor storage� area be fenced with vinyl slats and the
fence be no higher than eight feet tall.
Mr. Dacy stated that thE� Planning Commission added a stipulation
that the storage area be excavated, lined with plastic, and six
inches of Class 5 material be installed.
4.13
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 9 1990 PAGE 15
Mr. Leffel, the petitioner, stated that this storage are;� would be
used by Shorty's Towing to tow vehicles to a secured ��rea. He
stated that where Shorty's now tows vehicles to their facility
there are no repair facilities at the site. He stated tt�;��, most
of the time, the insurance companies allow hir_ to rc�,:,ir the
vehicle in order to avoid another tow.
Councilman Billings stated that he is not concerned with the dollar
value of the rental agreement Mr. Leffel has with Shorty�s, only
if Shorty's receives any payment from Mr. Leffel if he would work
on the vehicles Shorty's brings to his establishment.
Mr. Leffel stated that if he repairs the vehicle, Shorty�s would
receive a 10 percent commission.
Councilman Billings stated that he is concerned frora the standpoint
tha.t this outside storage may not be incidental to the operation
of Mr. Leffel's body shop. He stated that, typically, outside
storage is associated or is an incidental aspect of a particular
business. He stated that he believes this goes beyond.that scope.
Councilman Billings stated that there is also the� philosophical
question that when a person's vehicle is towed to an auto body
repair shop that, in fact, there may have been coercion by their
insurance company to do business with a particular body shop. He
felt possibly the City's contract with Shorty's should be reviewed
and put in a clause to specifically prohibit that type of thing.
Ms. Dacy stated that the Zoning Ordinance does not address the
issue that exterior storage of materials has to.be an accessory
use to the principal use. She stated that staff's interpretation
is that it is outdoor storage of materials, and they have to obtain
a special use permit and whether or not it is related to the use
is not a criteria that is specifica�ly stated.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that the code does not
specifically state that the storage has to be an incidental use and
whether or not this should be changed, he felt was a policy issue.
Mr. Leffei felt that to refer to coercion was not appropriate as
the owners of these towed vehicles can have t�eir cars fixed
anywhere they wish.
Councilman Billings stated that Mr. Leffel was the one who brought
up this issue and stated that the insurance adjuster sometimes may
not want to pay for another tow.
Mayor Nee stated that there are tires stored in �he bac3� area of
this property. Ms. Dacy stated that staff uould reinspect the
premises.
4.14
FRZDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEE'TING OF JIILY 9, 1940 PAGE 16
Councilman Schneider st:ated that if this building is not in
compliance, he is not co�mfortable with proceeding.
Councilwoman Jorgenson si�ated that she was concerned that materials
could drain from these ve�hicles into the ground and contaminate the
soil.
Mr. Leffel stated that b�y the time the vehicles reach the storage
area, most of them have already been drained of any fluids.
Mr. Leffel stated Council can state that he cannot offer Shorty's
a commission, and he would be happy to go along with this
stipulation.
Mayor. Nee stated that he shared some of the same concerns as
Councilman Billings.
MOTION by Councilman Bi:llings to table this item until July 23,
1990. Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all
voting aye, Mayor Nee de.clared the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Nee stated that he would like to know what Shorty's is doing
on the vehicles he tows for the City. He was also concerned about
the signage for this building.
B. RESOLUTION NO. 48-1990 AUTHORIZING.AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY
OF FRIDLEY AND RECIPIENTS OF 1990 FEDERAL �COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK G}2ANT FUNDS FOR HUMAN SERVICE ORGI�NIZATIONS: �
Mr. Steve Barg, Planning Assistant/Code Enforcement Officer;'stated
that $33,291 has been de.signated for community services under the
Community Development Block Grant program. He stated that the '
Human Resources Commis:�ion heard oral presentations from the
agencies requesting fun�ding. He stated that more requests for
funding were received this year than last-year even though there
was about $1,000 less in, funding.
��"�
Mr. Barg stated that it is recommerided Council approve the Human
Resources Commission's recommendation for allocation of these CDBG
funds to the various age:ncies�and authorize the City to enter into
contracts with the individual recipients of these funds.
Mr. Barg stated that a"c.orrected resolution has been submitted as
the Banfill-LockE Cente:r for the Arts was inadvertently omitted
from the resolution sub��itted in the Council's agenda packet.
MOTION by Councilr�an Fit.zpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 48-1990,
which includes $2,500 t�o the Banfill-Locke Center for the Arts.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
'
4.15
t`-�y 'aarv n. �-� i
��i �: ��g � _. � �
�; ",�"��11 i � k J , � � � � � � � �
�d'� � �
n��`+� �
�
�� �PPEAL.S DATE
C���F f'LAIVNING COMMISSION DATE : Ju�_ ?� ,:99ci
FRiDLEY C47Y COl)NClL DATE : July �, 199G AUTHOR r�11/dn
REQUES�'
PERMIT NUMBER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED REQUEST
LOCATION
SITE DATA
s�z�
DENSITY
PRESENT ZONING
ADJACENT LAND USES
8� ZONING
��$
PARK DEDICATION
ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL iMPL1CATIONS
CONFORMANCE TO
COMPREHENSNE PLAN
COMPATIBILITY WITH
ADJACENT USES 8� ZONWG
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS
STAFF RECOMMENDATlrJU
APPEALS RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
SP j� 90-0°
Phillip Leffel dba :�laaco aute Pa:nting and Bodyworks
Alloca outside storage of veh:cles .
100 Osborne Road N.E.
]67,£300 square feet
M-2, Heavy Industrial
M-2, iieavy Industrial.to the �as�, South, and North;
R-1, Sin�le Family Dwelling azd C-2, General Business
to the West.
Yes
Yes
�����-��v.��
Approval
. �
� ��
Stai f F2epo� t
SF tt9�-09, Ler�el Inc. for Maaco
Page 2
Request
Phillip Leffel of Maaco Auto
a special use pernit for the
auto painting and bodyworks
Site
Painting and Bodyworks is requesting
outside storage of cars related to the
facility.
This request is located on Lot 2, Block 4, Commerce Park, generally
located at 100 Osborne Road N.E. Located on the lot is a multi-
tenant building with M,aaco occupying the southeastern two tenant
spaces. The parcel is zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial, as are parcels
to the east, south, an� north. The Burlingto» Northern railroad
tracks are located to the west of the parcel with R-1, Single
Family Dwelling, and C--2, General Business, zoning to the west of
the railroad tracks.
Analysis
The petitioner is requesting that the special use permit be issued
in order for him to fu].fill contractual obligations with Shorty's
Towing. Section 205.18.O1.C.(12) of the zoning code allows outside
storage of materials �3nd equipment with a special use permit.
Shorty's Towing has a contract with the City of Fridley to tow
accident .vehicles to a secured area. Maaco's contract with
Shorty's allows them tc� act as a"satellite lot" for Shorty's.
The petitioner is prop��sing to fence a space 48 feet by 80 feet
adjacent to the southea�st wall of the building, which is adjacent
to Maaco's tenant stall.. The fence is proposed to be constructed
of chain link. Currently, this area is grassed and curbed. While
not highly visible from the public right-of-way, staff recommends
that appropriate screening be required with approval of the special
use permit.
Recommendation and StiX�ulations
As the proposed storage area is relatively small and is not highly
visible from the public right-of-way, staff recommends that the
Planning Commission rec.ommend approval of the special use permit
request, SP �90-09, to allow the exterior storage of vehicles and
equipment with the following stipulations:
1.
Vinyl slats shall be installed ior screening purposes.
2. The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall.
'4.17'
��
Sta f f Repcs t
SP �90-09, Leffel Inc. for Maaco
Page 3
Plannina Commission Action
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the special
use permit request. As a condition of approval, the Commission
added a third stipulation:
3. The storage area shall be excavated, lined with plastic, and
6 inches of class 5 material shall be installed.
Citv Council Recommendation
Please refer to stipulations in cover mema.
4.18
�3�i.F��' r;7�!i'�`�i��:.
.
•
/�
C�a � JVIUN�TY DEVEL`�PMENT
.DEPARTMENT
N1 ENiO R�N i3 C,iNi
DATE: July 27, 1990 ���
i'
�.
TO: William E�urns, City Manager,� �
FROM: Jock Robe:rtson, Community Development Director
� Barbara �iacy, Planning Coordinator
Michele N[cPherson, Planning Assistant
SIIBJECT: Special tifse Permit Request for Maaco Auto Painting
and Body�rorks for Outdoor Storage, SP #90-09
At the July 9, 1990, meet:ing, the City Council tabled action on the
above referenced request. A number of issues were raised regarding
the City's contract with Shorty's Towing and its relationship wi�h
Maaco Auto Painting arid Bodyworks. Please see the attacYad
memorandum from Jim Hill,, the Public Safety Director, regarding ��he
City's current contract with Shorty's Towing.
Shorty's Towing has ind:�cated to us that they do not reeeive any
"referral fee" at this t:ime, nor do they intend to in the future.
However, should the Council want to impose this condition an
Shorty's Towing, it is recommended the contract be amended and
approved by the Council at a future meeting.
In order to resolve the other concern regarding outdoor storage on
the property in general, we have contacted the new tenant (Discount
Tires) regarding the �_llegal outdoor storage of tires and a
trailer, as well as an �.11egal sign. We also recommend that as a
stipulation to this rec�uest, the special use permit pertain to
Maaco Auto Painting and Bodyworks specifically.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that t.he City Councii approve the special use
permit with the following stipulations:
1.
2.
Vinyl slats shall be installed for screening purposes.
The fence shall be no higher than 8 feet tall as outlined
by the Zoning Code. -
3. The sod shall be removed and replaced with ciass 5 gravel
with some type: of liner or barrier between the gravel and
the ground to protect the ground from lea};age.
4.19
�
Special Use Permit for Maaco Auto Painting and Bodyworks
July 17, 1990
Page 2
4. This special use permit applies solely to t7aaco Auto
Painting and Bodyworks. This special use permit cannot
be transferred to a future tenant without the approval
of the Planning Commission and City Council.
BD:ls
M-90-500
4rf�O
• �
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorq�ison. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared th�Imotion carried unanimausly.
6. SPECIAL USE PERMI`.0 SP #90-09 BY LEFFEL INCORPORATED FOR
MAACO AUTO PAINTIN�G AND BODYWORKS. TO ALLOW EXTERIOR STORAGE
OF MATERIALS AND E�OUIPMENT ON LOT 2 BLOCK 4, COMMERCE PARK,
AND THAT PART OF L�T 2 LYING IN SECTION 10-30-24. SUBJECT TO
UTILITY AND GAS EA:3EMENTS AS SHOWN ON PLAT AND SUBJECT TO ANY
OTHER EASEMENTS OF' RECORD GENERALLY LOCATED AT 100 OSBORNE
ROAD N.E. (TABLED ,JULY 9, Z990):
Mr. Robertson, Community Development Director, stated that a
question was raised at the last meeting pertaining to a referral
fee. He stated that ��horty's Towing has indicated they do not
receive any referral fee nor do they intend-to in the future.
Mr. Robertson stated that the other concern about the storage of
the tires and an illega:L sign has been investigated and the tenant
contacted.
MOTION by Councilman Bi:llings to grant special use permit, SP #90-
09, with the following stipulations: (1) vinyl slats shall be
installed for screening purposes; (2) the fence shall be no higher
than eight feet tall as outlined by the Zoning Code; (3) the sod
shall be removed and rEaplaced with class 5 gravel with some type
of liner or barrier between the gravel and the ground to protect
the ground from leakage�; and (4) this special use permit applies
solely to Maaco Auto Painting and Bodyworks. This special use
permit cannot be tran�sferred to a future tenant without the
approval of the Plannirng Commission and City Council. Seconded by
Councilman Fitzpatrick.
MOTION by Councilman Billings to amend stipulation No. 3 as
follows: (3) the area shall be blacktopped or the sod shall be
removed and replaced w:Lth class 5 gravel with some type of liner
or barrier between the�gravel and the ground to protect the ground
from leakage. Secondeci by Councilman Fitzpatrick. Upon a voice
vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried
unanimously.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKE.N ON THE MAIN MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously. -
7.
JULY 9, 1990)•
MOTION by Councilman Bi�llings to approve�he on-sale beer license
for Nikki's Tap at 5895 University Avenue. Seconded by Councilman
Schneider. Upon a voice vote, al� �oting aye, Mayor Nee declared
the �otion carried unanimous�:�:�
�
4.21
'� �
3- ._
.�.
C���F
FRI DLEY
FRIDLEY h11.'\ICIP.�L CEtiTER • 5-t?1 L��1�'ERSITY' A�'E. N_E. FRIDLEY, MN 55=�32 •(612) 571-��iQ • F.�\ r6J�� i71-1?�i
CITY COUNCIL
ACTION TAKEN NOTICE
August 8, i990
Leffel Incorporated for .
I�1ddC0 Auto rai;��izg and Bodyworks
Philip Leffel
148 Osborne Roa: N.E.
Fridley, I�1 55=32
Dear Mr. Leffel:
On July 23, 199C, th.e Fridley City Council officially.approved your
request .for a special �se permit, SP #90-09, to allow exterior
storage of mate�ials and equipment on Lot 2, Block 4, Commerce
Park, and that _art of Lot 2 lying in Section 10-30-24, subject to
util ity and gas easements as shown on plat and subj ect to any other
easements of re:.ord, gen�rally located at l00 Osborne Road N.E.,
with the follou_ng stipulationsr
l. Vinyl slat= shall be installed for screening purposes.
2. The fence =hall be no higher than 8 feet tall as outlined by
the Zoning Code.
3. The area s:all be blacktopped or the sod shall be removed and
replaced c,-�th class 5 gravel with some type of liner or
barrier be�ween the gravel and the ground to protect the
n,-�,.:;,a frv_ l��kagQ
� _ � ._ .
4. This speciai use permit applies solely to Maaco Auto Painting
and Bodywc=;�s. This special use permit cannot be transferred
to a futL�-e tenant without the approval of tne Planning
Co�un�ssio~: �nd City Council.
` 4.22.
Philip Leffel
August 8, 1990
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding the above action, please call
the Planning Department at 571-3450.
Sincerely,
-'N
Jock Robertson
Community Development D:�rector
JR/dn
cc: Real-Vest Company
Please review the noted stipulations, sign the statement below and
return one copy to the City of Fridley� Planning Department by
August 22, 1990.
�
�
� - � / i ;
Con r with action taken.
4.23
r �
�
.
Comm�unity Development Department
PLANNING DTVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 9, :L995 e,
��.
TO: William Burn:�, City Manager �{m
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Cormnunity Development Director
Grant Fernel:ius, Housing Coordinator
SUBJECT: 1995 Communi�ty Development�Block Grant Program
The City Council must formally approve its 1995 Community
Development Block Gran�t (CDBG) program before an application can
be submitted to Anoka �County (due by February 28th). Attached
is a copy of the 1995 �CDBG application.
The application outlines the activities which were presented at
the January 23, 1995 public hearing. Howe�er, there is ane
change to the proqram �with regard to the public service
allocation. On February 2nd, the Human Resources Commission
concurred with the general funding levels for this year, but did
not recommend reallocation of the 1993 pubZic service funds to
the Senior Home Companion and Senior 0utreach programs. Attached
is a memo from Steve Barg and a copy of the HRC�s February 2nd
meeting minutes.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the 1995 CDBG
application as present,ed.
GF/
M-95-101
� _
�
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Community Development Department
PLA��TNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
February 8, 1995
✓�Grant Fernelius, Housing Coordinator
Steven Barg, Planning Assistant
HRC Recommendations Regarding CDBG Funds
On February 2, 1995, the Human Resources Commission (HRC) d�scussed the City's proposed
1995 CDBG funding application and the reallocation of unused 1993 CDBG public service
monies. The HRC unanimously passed a motion concurring with staffs proposed 1995 CDBG
funding application. This application includes $2,500 each to ACCAP (Senior Outreach Worker)
and Fridley Senior Center (Senior Companion Program), as well as $25,000 additional public
service dollars to be allocaxed at a future date.
However, the Commission voted to table consideration �of reallocating $4,550.17 in unused 1993
CDBG public senrice funds until its March meeting. At that time, the HRC wishes to review all
1994 applicants before recommending reallocation of these funds. The Commission expressed
concern that the two senior programs might appear to be receiving preferential treatment in tlus
process, and the HRC wanted all agencies to receive fair consideration.
I have attached a copy of the unapproved HRC minutes from the February 2, 1995 meeting for
your review. These minutes will not be formally approved until the Commission's March 2, 1995
meeting.
Please let me know if you have questions, or would like to talk about this further.
SB:da
Enc.
M-95-86
�2
1995 Comrnunity Development Block
Grant Program
Ap�ilication for Funding
City of Fridiey
February 1995
. 5.03
City of Fridiey
1995 Community Development Block Grant Program
Proposed Activities and Funding Levels
Activi
Housing Rehab
Assistance
Public Service
Grant Pool
Senior Outreach
Program
Senior Home
Companion Program
Anoka County
Administration
Fu�din9.
$124,210
$25,000
$2,500
$2,500
$1,000
r..�._...
$i 55,210
�
' S.04
Meets HUD Re, ulation
CFR 570.202
CFR 570.201 (ej
CFR 570.201 (e)
CFR 570.201 (e)
CFR 570.206
1. PROJECT NAME: Housing Rehabilitation of Owner-Occupied
Single-Fam�ly Homes
11. PROJECT ACTtViTI(:
1. Project Locatio�n
This project will be carried out on a City-wide basis and is
available to anv homeowner who meets the Quidelines of the
proQram whichi are described below. �
2. Description of Activi
This project pnovides financial assistance to very low-income
homeowners in the form of a zero-interest, deferred payment
loan. The funcis can only be used to make basic code repairs
and improvem�ents and all homes must meet federal Housing
Quality Standards upon completion of the work.
The maximum assistance is $15,000 per household. A portion
of this amount must be repaid (without interest) upon sale of
the home.
Eligibility Requirements:
a) The applicant must be very (ow income {50% of inedian
income) ;and meet the guidelines which are based on
householld size.
b) The applicant must own and live in the single-family
home to be improved.
c) The applicant must have less than $25,000 in assets.
3
,
5.05
II. PROJECT ACTIVITY (cont.)
2. Description of Activitv (cont.)
All homes are inspected to determine eligible repairs and the
homeowner is given a scope of work, technicai specifiications
and assistance in obtaining quotes. A minimum of three (3)
estimates from licensed contractors are required, and the
homeowners must select the lowest most responsible bid.
All work is performed under a written contract between the
homeowner and the contractor and the City inspects the work
to ensure it is properly completed.
3. Number ot Persons Benefittinq
Based on past experience it is estimated that eight to ten very
low income households will benefit from this project.
4. How Do They Benefit
These households will benefit from this program by living in
safer, more sanitary and energy efficient housing. It is u�likely
that these househo{ds could afford to fix up their homes
without the assistance provided from this program.
5. Low-Income Benefit
This project will aid in the prevention and elimination of slum
and blight as defined under CFR 570.202. In addition, in
addition because the program has income restrictions, on{y
low-income persons will be assisted.
�
5.06
111.
IV.
v.
PROJECT DURATlC)N
�
:
This project willl be compieted within the 18 month period.
CDBG funds h;ave been used in previous years for the same
purpose.
This project willl be completed by no later than December
31, 1996.
Not Applicable
COMMUNITY PROEtLEMS ADDRESSED
This program helps �address the need for housing rehabilitation
and neighborhood irnprovement. As a first-ring suburb, Fridley
has a considerable r�umber of smaller, older homes which have
suffered from deferrE;d maintenance over the past several years.
This program is one component of a much larger effort to help
people fix-up and im�prove their homes.
VI.& FUNDING SUMMAFtY & COST DETAIL
VII.
Housing Rehabi(itation Grants
Administration
Total
$110,577
$13,663
$124,210
* The City will �contract with Anoka County Community Action
Program to prc,vide administrative services such as
inspections, wc�rk write-ups, and project monitoring.
5
5.07
VI11. PROJECT AREA
This project will be available city-wide.
IX. LARGER EFFORT
This project is part of a much larger effort to improve the City's
housing stock and neighborhoods. Currently, the City and HRA
have severai housing rehabiiitation programs, a first-time
homebuyer mortgage program, and to acquire and remove
dilapidated and substandard housing.
Over the last two years the City and HRA have invested more than
$1.3 miliion through a variety of programs. The City is committed
to continue these efforts in _the future and plans to budget $250,000
per year for housing related programs. The HRA budgeted more
than $600,000 in 1994 for housing programs and it is anticipated
that this commitment wiil continue in the future.
X. CONTACT PERSON
Grant Fernelius
Housing Coordinator
Fridley HRA
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
# 572-3591
# 571-1287 (fax)
XI. EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
Persons authorized to request reimburseme�t for any expenses
included in this program include Howard Koolick and Donna
Tornhom for the City of Fridiey.
6
5.08-
X!!. Not Applicable
7
5.09
f. PR4JECT NAME Public Seniice Grant Pool
I1.
PROJECT ACTIVITY
- 1.
2,
3.
�
Project Location
This project will carried out on a City-wide basis.
Description of Activitv
The City of Fridley i� its effort to provide needed senrices to
residents is providing assistance to community groups and
non-profit organizations to carry out activities which:
a)
�
c)
Provide service to predominantly lower income people;
or
Need funding #or facilities, supplies, operating
expenses or staff time, but not construction; or
Seek CDBG funding which will not substitute for
previous regular funding from the City of Fridley.
Number of Persons Benefittinct
At this time it is not possible to provide information on this
matter due to the fact that no decisions have been made on
which groups to fund.
How Do They Be�efit
!n the past the City has funded groups which provide a wide
range from re#erral services, meal programs, youth activities,
advocacy for disabled individuals, and hospice programs.
:�
5.10
11. PROJECT ACTIVITIf (cont.)
5. Low-Income Benefit
This project wiill directiy benefit iow to moderate income
families as defined under CFR 570.201 (e).
I11. PROJECT DURATI��N
A. This project wiill be completed within the 18 month period.
B. This project wiill be completed no later than December 31,
1996.
IV. Not Applicable
V. COMMUNITY PR013LEMS ADDRESSED
This project which h�elp the City of Fridley meet the following goals
and objectives:
1) To maximize tlhe benefits to the citizens of Fridley from the
limited resourc;es available for public and human services
funding.
2) To cost effectively provide public and human services that
might not othE;rwise be provided through the public sector.
3) To provide a rneans of responding to the changing needs and
interests of thE; community.
�7
5.11
VI.& FUNDING SUMMARY AND COST DETAIL
V11.
Human Service Grant Pool
Senior Home Companion Program
Senior Outreach Program
Total
Vlil. Not Applicable
!X.
X.
Not Applicable
CONTACT PERSON
Steve Barg or Grant Femelius
City of Fridiey
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
# 572-3595 or # 572-3591
# 571-1287 (fax)
XI. EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
$25,000
$2,500
$2,500 -
$30,000
Persons authorized to request reimbursement for any expenses
included in this program include Howard Koolick and Donna
Tjornhom for the City of Fridley.
Xtl. Not Applicabte
10
5.12
CITY OF FRIDLEY
HIIMAN RESOIIRCEB C�DMMISSION MEETING� FEBRIIARY 2� 1995
................................. ...,..................,...........,........,............. .............,..........«
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Oquist call�ed the February 2, 1995, Human Resources
Commission meetinq to o:rder at 7:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Others Present:
LeRoy Oquist, Terrie Mau, Clem Coverston,
Charles Welf
Jeanne Raffesberger
Steve Barg, Planning Assistant
Dave Sallman, Public Safety Director
APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 3, 1994. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Mau, seconded by Mr. Welf to approve the November
3, 1994 Human Resources Commission minutes as presented in
writing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQIIIST DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA:
MOTION by Mr. Welf, seconded by Mr. Coverston to approve the
Human Resources Commission agenda as presented.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQQIST DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED.
2. NEW BUSINESS•
a. Presentation/Discussion Regarding Hate Crimes and
Cultural Dive.rsity Issues: Dave Sallman, Public Safety
Director
Mr. Barg informed the C'ommissioners that he has been receiving
information from the Mi.nnesota League of Human Rights Con�naission
regarding hate crimes. Mr. Sallman, Public.safety Director has
also been receiving simiiiar information from the�Minnesota Chiefs
of Police and was asked� by Mr. Barg to present this information
to the Commissioners fa�r their review.
Mr. Sallman distributed� information in regard to this issue. He
explained that Fridley has between 8- i0 crimes per year that
fall under the classifi.cation of a"hat� crime". Approximately.
5.13
HUMAN RESOORCES COMMIg3ION MEETING FEBRIIARY 2 1995 PAGE 2
5� of Fridley residents are those of color, and therefore there
is a potential for this type of incident. Mr. Sallman stated the
school systems have been working hard to try to prevent this type=
of incident from occurring as well as the police department
through their new Outreach Worker, Kevin Thomas who has also been
working with the local schools. Mr. Sallman noted the enclosed
material from the City of Eden Prairie, whereby a special event
was held upholding the rights of individuals to whom hate crimes
may be directed at.
Mr. Sall�an informed the Commissioners that the Police Department
has a Diversity Council who have had special diversity training.
Mr. Welf requested clarification in regard to the assault/hate
crime issue, in particular how a judge deals with this type of
crime.
Mr. Sallman responded that it is important to�determine the
motive for an assault. Any time it appears that it is racially
motivated the crime becomes a hate crime. He further stated they
are trying to classify hate crimes as more serious crimes
carrying a tougher penalty. However, in order to do so, the
Police Department must be able to make the determination that it
is indeed a racial crime and to prove it. '
Ms. Mau inquired as to.whether the Police Departmerit sees.
evidence of racial issues in the high school as opposed.to
middle school.
more ._
the
Mr. Sallman felt it perhaps is acted out more in the high school.
Ms. Mau further inquired as to why there are more of these types
of problems in the high school and if there are situations that
exist in the high school tliat contribute toward forming negative
attitudes in children as they move into the upper grades. She
noted she sees far more evidence of prejudice in the high school
than in the middle school.
Mr. Coverston stated high school students have more contact with
a variety of different groups; therefore, there is the potential
for more conflictive situations. Furthermore, many of the
issues of conflict are not racially motivated at all but rather
ordinary issues that students argue about. -
J`
Mr: Barg stated the Human Resources Commission is the body
charged with addressing any human rights issues within the City.-
B takin t'
ime o
t v'
Y g re iew the i o
nf rmatio
n provided by Mr. Sallman,
the Commissioners couId in the future make a decision as to
wr whether;;there is a role that they could play in regard to this ;
'�� �.. important 'issue. 4 " r b � � f �;
, � .
.
;
t.,K,�' ' � . _ .. : ; a 1
��,. ... . ' ' � . � . .
i: t
, :, �.,.......... � ......., .'. � �. . .,t . . .. . "k ,.. , p�:f . .
` "..r:.: � . .. . *:k 1 ,. 7" ,
a� � t.a ';,: .
c -
r.�
h� �7 ��`. .. � : . . � � . . � . .
� r j � ' � . � : �.,
� `5,:14-
HQMAN RESOIIRCES COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 2, 1995 PAGE 3
Mr. Sallman stated he feels the Minnesota Hwnan Rights Commission
wants to make sure that, these racial issues and hate crimes never
become tolerable or acc�eptable in our society and that we should
work together to resolv�e issues which may contribute toward this
type of behavior.
Mr. Barg stated the Com�ission may elect to have a group address
solely human rights iss;ues.
Mr. Oquist stated this issue will be further discussed at a
Euture meeting.
Mr. Barg informed the C:ommissioners that he has accepted a
position with the City of Isanti as City Administrator, effective
February 13, 1995. He took this opportunity to introduce Mr.
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator.
Mr. Hickok informed the: Commissioners that two advertisements for
the Planning Assistant position have appeared in the Star Tribune
and that he is hoping t:o have a replacement hired by mid to late
March.
b. Review/Discus:a 1995 CDBG Process:
Mr. Barg distributed a memo from Grant Fernelius, Housing
Coordinator, in regard to the 1995 CDBG Funding Schedule. He
noted the January 5th iiuman Resource CoYUmission meeting had been
canceled, but that he had talked with Mr. Fernelius, Ms. Dacy and
Mr. Hickok and expressE.d the concern the Commissioners had voiced
at the September meeting, in regard to allocating $10,000
additional dollars in c�DBG funds next year for human service
funding. He requested that a copy of the minutes of that n►eeting
be included with anyth:ing sent to the City Council so that they
were aware of the requ��st.
Mr. Barg distributed a copy of the memo from Barb Dacy and Grant
Fernelius in regard to the Public Hearing for the 1995 Community
Development Block Gran�t Program. He noted that the Public
Hearing was held, as s��heduled on January 23rd.
MOTION by Ms. Mau, sec��nded by Mr. Coverston to concur with the
City Council's recommendation on the proposed activities for 1995
CDBG funds.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON OQUIST DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED.
c. Consider Re-allocation of Unused 1993 CDBG Funds:
Mr. Barg informed the Commissioners that three agencies who
received funding under the 1993 CDBG proq�am did nat use all of
5.15
/�
IiLTMAN RESOURCES COMMISSION MEETING FEBRIIARY 2 1995 PAGE 4
their funding by the December 31, 1994 deadline, and therefore
have turned the money back over to the City of Fridley for re-
allocation. The total amount available for re-allocation is'
$4,550.17 ($4,120.22 came from Health One due to the cancellation
of their Youth at Risk Program). ACCAP has informed the City
that the amount of money they received last year under the
program provided only about twelve hours of an outreach worker's
time for 40 weeks. Their proposal provides for twenty hours per
week; therefore they would only be able to provide about 60� of
the service they would like to. They are awaiting to see how the
money is reallocated to see the total funds they will be awarded
from the City. Mr. Barg also stated he has received information
from the Fridley Senior Center in regard to the Senior Home
Companion Program in which they have broken down the costs for
one companion and two companions. They would like to provide
more companion time but will need additional funds in order to do
so. The Commission must consider how they would like to
reallocate these funds and make a recommendation to the City
Council. The county has informed the city that by March 31st
they must submit something stating how these funds have been
reallocated.
Ms. Mau stated she believes the monies must then be spent by
June, 1995.
A discussion followed in regard to the reallocation of these=`"=!°
funds. Mr.'Oquist felt that other organizations should be given
the opportunity.to submit requests for these additional funds.
Ms. Mau also stated she felt all of the 1994 applicants should be
notified to have the opportunity to ask for the reallocation
money. After much discussion, the commissioners concurred that'a
letter should be sent out to all 1994 CDBG applicants, informing
them of the additional funds available, the deadlines for the �
expenditure of these funds, etc., and ask them to submit a�
request for funding to be considered at the March meeting of the
Human Resources Commission, provided they have need for the funds
and are able to expend them by June 1995. A determination will
then be made by the Commissioners at the March meeting and a
recommendation will be made to the City Council.
MOTTON by Ms. Mau, seconded by Mr. Welf that a memo be submitted
to the City Council informing them that the Human Resources' �
Commission is requesting that ietters be sent to all 1994 '
applicants notifying them of the reallocation of funds and
deadlines for expenditure of these funds. The Human Resources
Commission will make a decision as to the recipients at the March
meeting.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL,VOTiNG AYE� CFIAIRPERSON OQIIIST DECLARED '..
THE MOTION CARRZED.-.,....-.... . .. � <. t
_ . t , ., .
5.1fi
HUMAN RESOORCES COMMISSION MEETING, FEBRIIARY 2, 1995 PAGE 5
MOTION by Mr. Coverston, seconded by Mr. Welf to adjourn the
meeting at 9:02 p.m. "
IIPON A VOICE VOTE� ALL'VOTING AYF, CHAIRPERSON OQQIBT DECLARED
THE MEETING ADJOIIRNED.
Respectfully submitted,
�Gt�2� �Z� � - ��j �� f d c,�
Tamara D. Saefke
Recording Secretary
5.17
Engineenn9
Sewer
Water
IParks
'Streets
Maintenancc
TO: William W. Bums, City Manager �� PW95-018
�J �
FROM: John G. Flora, Public Works Director
��,?.� Jon Thompso:n, Estimator/Construction In,spector
DATE: February 13, 1995
SUBJECT: Change Ordex No. 2- Locke Lake Dam Restoration Project No. 211
Change Order No. 2 addresses ch�ain link fence modifications requested by Fred Halvorson
and extension of the safety platiform over the debris rack.
Recommend Council approve Clhange Order No. 2 in the amount of $13,823.39 to Lunda
Construction for the Locke Lake Dam Restoration Project No. 211.
JT/JcF:cz
s.o 1_
I�
.,, •_
�. � �
CITY OF FRIDLEY
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
6431 UNIVERSITYAVENUE N.E.
FRIDLEY, MN 55432
February 9 3, 1995
Lunda Construction Company
P O Box 228
Little Chute, WI 54140-0228
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 2, Locke Lake Dam Restoration, Project No. 29 9
Gentlemen:
You are hereby ordered, authorized� and instructed to modify your contract for the Locke Lake Dam
Restoration Project No. 211 by adding the following work:
Additions:
Item Quantitv Price Amount
1. Modify chain link fence detail, widen 9 Lump Sum $13,823.39
walkway to the screen area and add
hand �ails for accessability
TOTAL ADDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13.823.39
TOTAL CHANGE ORDERS:
Original Contract Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $537,375.75
Contract Change Order
No. 1 (Deletion) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,306.50
No. 2 (Addition) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,823.39
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $�02.892.64
6.�2'�
Lunda Construction Company
Change Order No. 2
Febnaary 13, 1995
Page 2
Submitted and approved by John G. F'lora, Public Works Director, on the 13th day of February, 1995.
Prepared by
Checked by
J . Flora, P.E.
��ctor of Public Wo�lcs
Approved and accepted this dayr of , 1995 by
LUNDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Dennis Behnke, Project Coordinator
Approved and accepted this da�� of , 1995 by
CITY OF FRIDLEY
William J. Nee, Mayor
William W. Burns, City Manager
6.03
Engineering
y Sewer
� � water
� O Parks
O 3 Streets
v U Maintenance
W -�
5d
� _ �
a
� MEMORANDUM �
William W'. Burns Cit Manager q�� PW95-032
TO: , Y �
FROI�: � John G. F'lora,`vPublic Works Director
DATE:_
SUBJECT:
February 8, 1995
Summary c�f Street Maintenance Equipment Bids
Lised below is a summary of the three items bid on Wednesday,
February 8, 1995 for thE: 1995 Street Maintenance Budget:
1.
2.
3.
Asphalt Potho7Le Patcher
Hot Asphalt T��nk
Crum Rubber ME�lting Pot
Tot��l
1995 -
Budget
$34,080.00
$21,300.00
Low
Bid
$30,473.00
$26,232.00
$14,910.00 $16,755.00
$70,290.00 $73,460.00
Difference: ($3,170.00)
Currently, we are $3,1'10.00 over the 1995 budget. However, we
achieved a surplus of funds from the dump truck purchase in
January. The cab and c:assis was estimated at $43,000.00 and the
actual bid was $39,814.00 leaving a surplus of $3,186.00.
Recommend the City Counc.il approve the purchase of all three items.
JGF:ch
7.01
�
�
F�D�Y
Engineering
y Sewer
� Y Water
�
� O Pa►ks
O 3 Streets
V V Maintenance
uJ J
Q �
� _ �
a
MEMORANDUM
TO: William W. Burns, City Mana er � PW95-029
g �
FROM: John G. Flora,� Public Works Director
DATE: February 8, 1995
SUBJECT: Purchase of Asphalt Pothole Patcher
The 1995 Public Works budget identified $34,080 to purchase an
asphalt pothole patcher for street maintenance.
On Wednesday, February 8, 1995, bids were received and opened for
the asphalt pothole patcher. After advertising the notice to
bidders, two equipment dealers received specifications and one bid
was received.
Ruffridge Johnson Equipment Company was low bid at $30,472.85 for
a Pro-Patch Pothole Patcher.
Recommend City Council receive and award the bid to Ruffridge
Johnson Equipment Company for a Pro-Patch Pothole Patcher in the
amount of $30,472.85.
JGF:ch
%.OZ
�
�
CtNOF
�a.�r
�
a� �
a �o
� a� �
0 3 z°
�-I cd
W �
i�
ri N
.0 � .n
a a°
�
�
�
c
a
n
0
�
c,
�
¢
� O
�- W O
W =
..-� C7 U ei
� Z F- e-�
�--� ►-+ Q
� z a
ti W t!')
CL W �
p � O �
>- � F=-
F-- m O 0a
.-. �..
U � �
J Q
� _ �
am
cn w
¢ LL
�
Engineering
y . Sewe� . .
� Y : Water .
��
O Parks
03. Streets
� Maintenance
U V
� -3
�m
C �
� � nnEnnoRANOUM
TO:
FR�M:
DATE:.
SUBJECT.:
William VJ. Burns, City Manager � PW95-030
�
John G. ��lora,fPublic Works Director
February 8, 1995
Purchase of 1,100 Gallon Hot Asphalt Tank
The 1995 Public Works bizdget identified $21,300 to purchase a hot
asphalt tank for street maintenance.
On Wednesday, February �3, 1995, bids were received and opened for
the hot asphalt tank. A:fter advertising the notice to bidders, two
equipment dealers receiv�ed specifications and bid the asphalt tank.
Ruffridge Johnson Equip�aent Company was low bid at $26,232.02 for
a 1,100 gallon hot asph�lt tank.� (See attached bid sheet).
Recommend City Council receive and award the bid to Ruffridge
Johnson Equipment Compamy for a 1,100.gallon hot asphalt tank and
electric heater in the ��mount of $26,232.02.
JGF:ch
�
8.01
e
�
�
FWD Y
0
• cp
1-� J-1
�
u'1
M
Y
2
1-¢- �
.
¢
�' J O
o i ao 0
� � �� �
� z ¢
4. W
�+- O
0 � 2 � E .,
�' � Z
►'- aD O
�-+ J CO
U J
Q }
C.D �
. Q
O �
O �
a1 m
� W
a-I LL p _
�
:�
B '
Engineering
y . Sewer .
'�,,, � ° Water
� O Parks
0 3. Streets
V V Maintenance
�) J
� �
O�
a �
MEMORANDUM
p; William W. Burns, City Manager �� PW95-031
T �
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
DATE: . February 8, 1995
SUBJECT: Purchase of Crum Rubber Melting Pot
The 1995 Public Works bu�dget identified $14,910 to purchase a Crum
Rubber Melting Pot for �,treet maintenance crack filling.
On Wednesday, February 8�, 1995, bids were received and opened for
the melting pot. Aft:er advertising the notice to bidders,
equipment companies re,ceived specifications and one bid was
received for the meltinc��pot.
Spec Materials, Inc. w��s low bid at $16,755 for a Crum Rubber
Melting Pot (See attachEad bid sheet).
Recommend City Council receive and award the bid to Spec Materials,
Inc. for a Crum Rubber Z�Ielting Pot in the amount of $16,755.
JGF:ch
9.01
�
�
�
fWD�Y
�
v �
U cd
G 'd
a) F+
3-I O
a z
ro
a ,�
�+
� a�
�
0
a
N
L
�
C
C1
n
0
�
cn
�
O F
H
¢ Q
U
>' J M
� 2 Q a��i
"" �'+ �
� 2 �
l.L W W t!�
a. F- C�
t.� O J �
O W e-1
0 �
�- ►--.
F-- ca Z 00
«-. p
C.) J �-
J �
Q Q
. U' �
�
O m
O W
N LL
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Engineenn9
Sewer
�Water
iParhs
iSlreets
,Malnte�ance
William W. Btuns, City Manager��+�
i
John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
February 13,' 1995
Sanitary and :3torm Sewer Repair Project No. 277
PW95-023
Within our 1995 budget, we hav�e identified funds for the restoration of our sanitary and
storm sewer lines. The sanitan� repair work is concentrated on corrugated metal pipe
which we are lining to extend its life and prevent further rusting and deterioration of the
system The storm sewer work fa�cuses on those systems where they were laid with open
joints.
This year's project includes 605 :feet of corrugated metal pipe off of Lucia Lane as weA as
661 feet of corrugated metal pipe along 7th Street. Our storm sewer consists of 3 i S lineal
feet of open jointed concrete pip�e on 75th Avenue.
This year we have included an :altemate bid item for lining a storm sewer along Central
Avenue for 688 feet north of 73�rd. We televised this line and found a number of broken
sections. We have contacted the Anoka County Highway Department and suggested they
participate in funding the repair. of this system this year or consider replacement of this
line in their proposed improvem,ent of Central Avenue. Accordingly, we have identified
this as an alternate bid pendinq the Anoka County Highway Department's decision on
how to deal with this section.
Recommend the City Council ai�thorize the staff to advertise for the Sanitary and Storm
Sewer Repair Project No. 277.
JGF:cz
Attachment
' 1fl.01
i��
•e� •.
... , �
�OI�TPI�T 1�. - 1995
•� : • 1 •; �i•���:,r• � � i• •.� � s t:,i •,s � . • • �� •�•�►;:�• i
• � • :ri'.1 _i� I�i ^�I' : ��G _�' 1 V� Y • i� •1•. :i�"�;�i• •�:�I• • �• •�•,• :r •
WEEREAB, the City c:rnancil of th,e City of Fridley has established a p�licy of re�air to
sanitary and storm sewnrs when neo�ssary,
WHEREAB, the Public Works Director has sul�nitted a plan shaair�g the sanitary arid stornn
s�wers in rieed of repair,
1�7W, �, BE IT I�VED, by the City �i1 of the City of Fri.d1�Y, Anoka O�ntY.
Minnesota, as follc�ws:
l. Zhat tY�e sanitary ar�d starm sew�xs reo�d for repai.r by the Public Works
Department be repaired, ar�d the ta�rk irrvolved in said i.n�ravement shall
hereafter be designated as:
�:�.���4V �i;; ��� .'l���l;�„ �i:r;;l:rl; ,���' �: �:��_ l:r.�l � •
2. �e plans ar�d specificatiazs prepared by the Public Worl�s Departament for surh
i�mvemerYt ar�d eadl of the�n, pursuant to the Cbuncil action heretofore, are
hereby approved ar�d shall be filed with the City Clerk.
3. The woork to be perfornred utxler 8AN1'II�RY At�ID STORM SEWER REPAIR PIiUT�GT 1�.
277 be perforn�ecl undex one dontract.
The Public Works Dir�ector shall a000rdir�gly prepare ar�d cause to be i.nserted in the
official newspapex for bids upc� tl�e mak.ing of such im�r�ovemerits tuxlex such
approved plans arid specifications. 7i�e advertisemexit s�hall be publis�h�ed for two (2) w�s
(at least 10 days), ar�d shall specify the work to be done and will state that bids will
be apened at 10:00 a.ID. otl �f, � 15, 1995, in the (�aincil Chambers of the City
Hall, arid that no bids will be c�onsidered unless sealed and filed with the Public Works
Direct.or ar�d a000�anied by a cash cleposit, bid boryd, or oertified cherac payable to the
City of Fridley for five peroP�t (5�) of the amaunt of suc� bid. Zhat the advertisement
for bids for SANI'1�RY At�ID S'I�O�iM � REP�IIR PROi7FlGT Nt�. 277 s1�a11 be substantially
standa�l in form.
�t51� � I� • �• ' 4�� �.1" M •�� I M� • ' Y:1' • ' ' I� �:� ; �: � � •l' :rl:i'JII� '♦
�
� r• i- � « �+��
10.02
WILISAM J. N� - MAYOR
� • .. .. Z' .. 1 .. � O�N ■O1��1{ O��M1M�0
♦lt'.�I. ��_�� �1� . �
.B •i • � �
� 11 11M f �•�,
� ' , ' '
� � 1
'; .
m � ,h� �
' •o / � � i I
m /.
• � 1:1 �
I�I -� �t' ' '_y..�� i
7)r►tr � � .� 1
�
I � ' � U7Ylf �M04�
� r
�I . � ' � • � � � � � �
v--
i � O 0
dD � . ; � fp. • ..
�' '�O MOlH • f` � J .
, � t
�tl �
m � .
�i1111� tI1tM • .
; t
. -p . � �
� � �r.� uuu�
� � :J
Y : // m
s -4 ° -
; � .
I, � � �i 1�7�� � '�
�� �, )r1Mi�� � � -
� • � 11%�� �p
_QI � w i � i ��J. .
•� ( � � �
� {+ i , �� � i : �r � , —_ 11��
' 1 I � � � , .
�) t i M / a
I� • ° Y .
_ % o �
Y �
� � W
.,
;.
o. a Y
, � � . � . � , ,
` '' •a V- � �
:-
� � •� -
. . : . ' , J , J � , za -
8 .0 �8 �0- - - , ; :j � • � . �:: �
. j � �
`–����� • �—'_ a - 7t�ii. . .. � ' ' O ' O ���wY00�� ". .
. � � °—.�. p � � *" ., ., .�.,.
p . o_.^.�� � � �
-- o----�
.—� ' }
••—o---o e--
:
. —o--•—o b � ' / 0
_.__�__. .,... W ��
t�
, � 71�• �_193 - � 18V _ . -� .
I Y . -e , W . . �
.
: �
M7YP• M�� � �t
i �
� �e •
�� YOf/�tf � . .
= -- ..4 � < k .
. � � _ � e .�.�
.. i �
.` ' �
� y � .
c� •isr� w�
• � �
� � 9 N
•lMt� IOM01�11
il + `. � � �� � we .9 + f
I •. � . - . r
\ ' '
.
� ��
"r � �.�
• •
I �► � . . p '
: r9��� ' - t���
� �� � p �
� �� 'u+ „9 . .9
�•`y .e •
. o���ho' + . . � � . � e
� � t � J3 �� •� � � • �+.
i
� „g -�-- —a— —o— _ � ,w,
��� ' '••.. , \1 1 ' ! • � ' ! 11 � � .r
i
i
• � '
. . t � . •
� �� � � � ' . � � W � � .
.-�• ' � . . ' • � . ' ' � � f �
� �
— e' � �'� � • ;' -.'�. ,�
• � '����
. .
��,�a� - .a�.�n \ W ,:
N ,
�__•b_- .9 �Y
. 1A/Y4 ` �
m � ■ �YO )��l !TI• y
t:J�� Ll7Yll ��•^O �
. � : • � �
� � •e ' � ' � •
�' � ^ .
. > �
, � � � :
� �7)��s lor.ow � a
� � . 117�1t fC�rOw
',,,,,,, •� - _ r _ (, �" � .
� ' a��ut ■oa.e•w � � �
• = � .o .Q � � � -
•
•u�r �' • t ► i• t � ■ �n� � � r � ' .6
' � �
• ; . :
• _ • • —
.�"'."_ - .9 . i . - � o � i
. .
.
N �m �
/7�1t B
t77 lt M1 `�r���r�
. r � •
�
` , • . . . . > . . Ml•
. . �Si� • . � , e0 , . . . — 177r1f ..
_ . . .. .0 . ".... . ... . .9 ._.. . . _ . ., ; . .� _ . . .
�e � � � � _ .
� �
ui.n • _ � j
«i �8 • �►�
. � , . �
�o a '� � _. � . — `
• +� � ,
iu�as
. � !�L.� � . , . . :
i�m M f° _ • - • t .B .
� g �8 -q i
^S' � J �9� • I
� � � ,SI _ � r.ts u�ris o•�
. �
i m .
�, . Z �
� _ °-' � , � t.� �
.. m � V' O f1YMIt( ' l)7i1S
�; - �� � � u . L_---J A
: f j; 'm e `
� •e � � „� tm ` �� � [�c.c
. O� ' �'1� �1` IM��Y 111Y15 .
O�,
fl . i�
� .9 m tni�a m a �'i.wiHi �� �
� a/7��s ••r� t � "� ��•w .
i r . 117+1�
re ~
, s
, ' `•. . � � � I
i
I� �• 9�� w . •�At1110� w 0 1111• U •
�
. u �� t0
�_..��•'..__••_. ..__..__.._......_ - 'W�'1'�9 .
� MrNt �airs� —� �� �� �� � �_ �_ �' ��' _�' �...�' ...�':.��5:��••_.� �� .
. '96 � � , ��T � .._ _:.--
� �Q ��i1�� �►�� �►�►��►� ��
'. � � S
• ; • - ..._..__..__..__..
. . � .
O f , . i � i • 0 1 �\�..��.. . �. .
` s . �� '��"��..�..
i � ; � � �e �p ,j, i ' �W ' ~ _ .
•
e i
, m.
a �
•w � ' �
i � w �g w �J ' .
1 9 • • ' �
� � • e c ,• Y •^ • • w
�
. : ' .n.,. ; � ' o
. . � '-. t.-. � . _ _ _ ..
' - --- - _ ---- - ' : ' - - •
i �'� �: .- � � . � .
- , _ • _�.
, ., � � e,,. .o:.,,.
, � •. .� � ' . ,.-..� . „ . . . .. .. _-- .. �,- • • � _ .
_ ' ' j ;� 3
� � � :.
, s^_nw�v�w •y . ` �Y � �_�
•
r .,
. / j i -
av ■ ' ' / 1 1
� � �
NH ��Il � � .i '� � - w . � . � � . �_' �.� � � ..
� . j / .� 1 . _ .
� � '
� � � � • � - -� � .°'� s. -1 . z�
� .
•�.+ ` • . �•
.• :
w � � f
� . � = 4�. � ; . . ' �� .�
.��,�. '.. � � . .
. �
� s w �
.S� � � .
� � _ � ;.
� J f ' .
� E M ' � i I - '
>
_ • ' °,�
� ^. " • - - / "
:
� , �� ]N111f1Y3A15 -�
W � - _ . � i' '+ . : � '
� S "t�w � • " � :' : .
� ^ � � ` • ' w
_ � �
� ;' � i
i+ . �11w1A� . �' .
W � , .
Y/ � N ' I . .
— : � � aver
� � . . � ' • :
/
; Q i , /
� _ � , a
1 `
_ : �
O u
� � �
� � — � ': .
i»� �
� � ' + r
. �
`° ♦ �r i
� .
. . . % ,Z -u ,.cz �
, . + . 1�r/100 t• 07511 M�110 . 'A�.N �'�� ." _'_ . - �..� � w�� 71�lt � ��� � ��� � �
�
wae.nx rr�
^�—�—r
� � �
I
i ,
A
i � '\ :
i J .
i �I .
I �
I v \
f �� �
�
� •a��is �ior i
� _.____ .-____. 1 . 5
1
,�•
��
_ �
1774i Nla1p
� ,
� �
ow�re
.v • I
,_�
>�
� • . . • . f � .. "_
� .'.' � = _ � . ' .
,� � • • • •I{'.�1. •• � .• •• •• ••
♦� �11M�f�M •�♦
J .. .
N ' '
•�I�/aIt �;11 .. . � � • - . . %
. �.. � � � ! � ,
� a �
y� � . �� � �'!': ,; � ` _ . � "r i
� • , • 4
• •_ '
,.Ad w .�� �� �� ` « . . ,
dM�i• . �<:��� �� �.:L-■ ' _ � . �
� �, � � .
_s, V � � . : ,
_
� J .+ I
•�a we• �
. � - F
� �
� � i
J , . ,
!� {7a�Y. •� �
� O • � ` ,
� � � �
� R •
W �
�x
F
W
.evu �
, � �
� �• 07t11 M�110
�
O •
� �
� ,, Y]FI�
�
��1 -
� \ �
J �\ ,
�
�A�\` ~ \
' /�
/,� .
�
\
•
.:
��
_ L2 " 1
�
TU: WILLIAM 'W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ��
�
FROM: RICHARD D. PRIBYI., FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RESOLUT][ON MODIFYING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
SENIOR CITIZEN DEFERMENT POLICY
DATE: February 9, 1995
Attached you will find the Special Assessment Deferment Policy that I previously reviewed
with Council. This resolution clhanges item number 3 to include eligibility for people who
are retired by permanent and to�tal disability for whom the assessment payment would cause
a hardship. It aiso modifies the: income requirement to read "the annual payment for the
special assessment exceeds 1% of the adjusted gross income of the owner, as determined
by the most recent Federal Inrome Tax Retum, or the household income is below the
VERY LOW INCOME threslhold, as defined by the Federal Income Limits for the
Community Development Blocic Grant Programs."
These changes have been revie:wed by the City Attomey and are in accordance with the
requirements defined through the State Statutes.
RDP/me
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. - 1995
A RESOLUTION DEFERRING SPECZAL ASSESSMENT PAYMENTS FOR
SENIOR CITIZENS
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes authorize cities to defer special
assessment payments for certain senior citizens, and
WHEREAS, said deferment of assessments may be permitted at the
discretion of the City Council, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley finds and
determines that deferral of special assessments for certain
senior citizens is in the public interest, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and proper that the City Council set
forth its general policies and guidelines for granting said
deferrals of special assessments for senior citizens,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Fridley does endorse the principle of deferment of special
assessments for senior citizens where the payment of said special
assessments constitute a hardship.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council's policy and
procedures for granting said senior citizen special assessment
deferments shall be based upon the following factors:
l. The property must be homestead property.
2. The owner must be at least 65 years of age or older, and in
the case of husband and wife, one member must meet this age
requirement.
3. The owner is retired by virtue of permanent and total
disability for whom it would be a hardship to make the
payment.
4. The owner will make application for deferred payments on
forms prescribed by the Anoka County Auditor and will make
application to the City of Fridley on forms provided by the
city.
5. The application for said deferral must be made within the
first thirty (30) days after the final assessment rolls are
approved by the City Council. This time limit may be waived
upon showing of extreme hardship.
6. The annual payment for the special assessment exceeds 10
the adjusted gross income of the owner, as determined by
most recent Federal Income Tax Return, or the household
income is below the VERY LOW INCOME threshold, as defined
the Federal Income Limits for the community Development
Block Programs.
11.02
of
the
by
7. The deferral will be terminated when any of the following
happen:
a. The death of the owner, provided that the surviving
spouse is not: other eligible for the benefits.
b. The sale, transfer, or subdivision of the property or
any part thez-eof .
c. Loss of home�tead status.
d. The City CouYicil determines that further deferments are
not in the public interest.
8. The City Clerk ha:� the responsibility and authority to
administer and ini�erpret this Resolution within the
guidelines set fo�cth herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1995.
MAYOR - WILLIAM J. NEE
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CI`.I'Y CLERK
11.03
s
_
C�N OF
FRIDLEY
IVlEMORANDUM
Municipal Center
6431 University Avenue {Northeast
Fridiey, Minnesota 5543�2
(612) 572-3507
FAX: (612) 57i-1287
William C. Hunt
Assisiant to the City Manager
�
Memo To: William W. Burns, City Manaqer,�
From: William C. Hu.nt, Assistant to the City Manaqer�C��
Subject:
Date:
Labor Aqreeme:nt with International Union of Operating
Engineers Loc;al No. 49
January 30, 3.995
The employees of th�� City of Fridley represented by the
International Union of Operating Engineers Local Union No. 49 have
voted to accept the o:Efer which the City has made. This will
involve the following c:hanges to the present contract:
1. Appendix A. A thr.ee percent (3%) increase in wage rates.
2. Addition of a Le<�d Mechanic assignment on a year by year
basis. The employ�ee assigned to be Lead Mechanic will review
repair requests; assign equipment repair orders to other
Mechanics; check progress of work; coordinate purchase and
pick-up of repair parts• review completed work orders; and
advise Superinten�dent of Public Works. For this the Lead
Mechanic would be paid an additional 63 cents an hour.
3. ARTICLE 19.1 IN�SURANCE. An increase in the maximum
contribution of the City toward health, life and dental
insurance for empl.oyees choosing dependant coverage of $30.00
per month from $3]_5.00 per month in 1994 to $315.00 per month
in 1995.
4. ARTICLE 19.2. IIVSURANCE. An increase in the maximum
contribution of ,�the City toward health, life, and dental
insurance for emp]Loyees choosing single coverage of $5.00 per
month from $205.O�D per month to $210.00 per month.
5. In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding dated June
1, 1987, by which members of the bargaining unit are eligible
for participatiori in the Flexible Benefit Plan for City
Employees an incx�ease of $10.00 in the City's monthly cash
contribution to e:mployees choosing Option B from $155.00 per
month to $165.00.
Memorandum to William W. Burns
Labor Agreement with International Union of Operating
Engineers Local No. 49
January 30, 1995
Page Two
6. ARTICLE XXIII EMPLOYEE EDUCATION PROGRAM. A cap of $2,250.00
per employee per year in the education benefit with extension
of the benefit from tuition only to include course required
books, educational materials, and fees.
Remaining in effect are the resolution and memorandum of
unders.tanding dated June 1, 1987 relating to the inclusion of
members of the Local Fridley Bargaining Unit in the Flexible
Benefit Plan for City employees and the resolution (also dated
June 1, 1987) authorizing the inclusion of certain Public
----- Works Maintenance employees in an employee separation benefit
plan.
S have prepared a resolution for consideration by the Fridley City
Council at its meeting of February 13, 1995.
WCH/jb
� 2.0
CONTRACT OFFER
TO
INTERNATIONAL UNIOPJ OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 49
FROM
7['HE CITY OF FRIDLEY
DECEMBER 12, 1994
In response to the pro�>osals submitted by the International Union of
Operating Engineers, Loc�l No. 49, and subject to City Council approval, I am
authorized to make the fo�llowing offer for the 1995 contract year:
19. Z The EMPLOYER v�✓ill contribute up to a maximum of }'� ��" `"'" �"� `'
�BAj-three hundred fort.y-five ($34�.00) per month
per employee towal-d group heaith and Iife insurance for employees
choosing €a�3� de�endent coverage for calendar year �99� 1995.
19.2 The EMPLOYER �vil1 contribute up to a maximum of '� •� '�• •- `' "� a
€'r . j-two hundred ten dollars ($210.00� per montl�-per
employee toward grc>up health and life insurance for employees choosing
single coverage for calendar year �9�-1995.
In accordance with the M�emorandum of Understanding dated June 1, 1987
the Cit�� will contribute on�e hundred sixty-five dollars ($165.00) per month to
each member of the bargaining unit who chooses Option B of the Flexible
Benefit Plan for City of F'ridley Employees.
ARTICLE XXIII. EMPI.OYEE EDUCATION PROGRAM
23.1 The City �vill pay �-�a-r� instructional costs up to a maximum of $2,250
per emplo e�.e pe�r year for training courses relevant to the
EMPLOYEE'S pre:sent or anticipated career responsibilities at City-
approved institution.s. The City will pay fifty percent (�0%) of the cost
of tuition in advance and the EMPLOYEE �vill pay the other fifty
percent (>0%). The: EMPLOYEE will be required to present to his her
Department ManaF;er a certi�cation of satisfactory �vork when the
course is completed.
a. Courses issuing a letter grade: a"C" or above is required.
12.03
a,
b. Courses issuing a numerical grade: a 70 percent grade is required.
c. Courses not issuing a grade: a certification from the instructor
certifying that the student has satisfactorily participated in the
activities of the courses is required.
23.2 I� the EMPLOYEE satisfactorily completes the course, the EMPLOYEE
�vill be reimbursed for the additional fifty percent {50%) of the tuition
required fees related to the course. The City will not reimburse the
EMPLOYEE for fees which are charged for instruction, associated
administrative expense, �eal� student membership, student health
coverage and other charges for which the �t-�et� EMPLOYEE receives
some item or service not directl,y related to the course of instruction.
23.3 The City will not reimburse the EMPLOYEE for expense� reimbursed
under some other education system or program, e.g. G. I. Bill.
APPENDIX A WAGES 1995 - a three percent (3.0%) increase on all 1994
wage rates. (See attachment.)
%,, � - ; _ , ;:
� .J � ___-_, -
.
. .���� -2��-,����1 , ,�-� ;� L�/ .
. , , �.
William C. Hunt
Assistant to the City Manager
Exclusive �Representative of the City of Fridley
12.04
PSW-A.1
PSW-A.2
APPENDI% A
AAGES 1995
Pub:lic services Aorker (PSA)
Entry
After o�ne (1) year of
satisfactory performance
in P5W-A classification
PSW-B.1 After two (2) years of
satisfactory performance
in PSW-A classification
and achievement of minimum
qualifications
PSW-B.2 After one (1) year of
satisfactory performance
in PSW-B classification
PSW-C After two (2) years of
satisfactory performance
in PSW-B classification
and achievement of minimum
qualifications
PSW-C
(Maintenance II in 1989)
PSW-D After five (5) years of
satisfactory pe�formance
and achievement of minimum
qualifications
PSW=D
(Maintenance III in 1989)
Hourly Rate
$3��5& 11.21
$�3:63 12.04
$3�-S� 12.89
$�3� 13 . 74
$i��r 14.58
$3�-6G 15.10
$�'�- 15.42
$}5�6 15.72
Advancement to the ne�ct step will occur at the next regular pay
period following satisfactory completion of the time of service
requirement and ach_�evement of minimum qualifications, if
pertinent.
Mechanic
Level Hourly Rate
A $ 34.�Q 14.58
B $ 3��.''-6 15 . 7 2
Person assictned to Lea�d rlechanic ,� $16. 35
sea��onal/Temporary Employees
Employees employed by the e*aployer on a seasonal/temporary basis
for no more than 125 �aorking days per calendar year either in a
full-time (more than 1�� hours per week) or part-time capacity will
be compensated as determined by the employer for the term of this
employment. Such employees will not be eiigible for any benefits
under the Agreement except those which may be required by law.
12.05-
m
P O S I T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N
POSITION TITLE'
DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
REPORTS TO:
�EAD MECHANIC �":::�em:: o�ar>::>;�1�rinu�1<:��:�`s:s� °idrii'eri�'":
.........:..::. :�;_::.:_;;:.:_�':_:..;;;>:_;::::y::::_>:>:.>:::.:::»:::<:»::>::»>:«;:::::<:�:;:»g:_ ;>::»»»;::»:�;�>:
PUBLIC WORRS/MAINTENANCE
SUPERINTENDENT OF PIIBLIC WORRS
POSITION OBJECTIVE: To maintain in good working order all City
mechanical equipment including light and heavy equipment so as to
avoid breakdown of vehicles which would delay essential work. �ilso
ESSENTIAL JOB FIINCTIONS:
l. Services, repairs, and maintains automobiles, trucks, and
light and heavy equipment owned by the City.
2. Does electric and gas welding.
3. Inspects equipment to determine the type and scope of repairs,
that are needed.
4. Completes annual equipment inspection and certification as
required.
5. Completes equipment work orders, parts inventory, and
equipment maintenance records.
»:. . .:.:::
:=::>::::::::C� ::>::.:::.:., :...::::::.:.::..:..;;.:.::.>:<_:,>,.:.,;:>�:-:::<_:.:>._.;_:.:::.:.;::::.;::;:.:.;.,.,:.:::-:::� ::;`:».-:`:>..:<;::::;:::::.:_:.:::,.::°': :>:::€: .
::>::7:;'n°:.:::::::.: i�ec3�s �n... p��gre�s::::o�... all....w�rk,.;
.....:. . .: .......... . ::
........:,..:...:;.::� :..
:.::: �.::.:;.;;;::.; �<> �:::.:.:;:;:.;:::;�;:.:�. .;,;.:::;::.. � ::..�:. :..
, .<_.,,;
..:.;:.:.: .. .
.....:..::::.
;:>; >;::>`::::;>>;�o� zna es_:.repai:xT.�:>p�r�s�:::purchas�� and_ac.; . �.s_�t�;ons ;i:cku :.:. .
... ..... ... ... . .................:......:::::::::.:::.:::.:::::>::._::.::::.:::::._.:_:::.::::.::.:�::.;::::.;::;::;.::._::::.:::.::::.:;>;:-::-::::._�?_- :-:::: :;.::.::;:;::: :.;:. _;-: :{ P: : : _:::::::�: p:.i..;:�.:
OTHER JOB FUNCTIONS:
�
l. Operaies City vehicles and other pieces of equipment.
2. Assists other departments in maintenance and repair of
stationary equipment, such as lift stations, wellhouses, etc.
3. Performs other related duties as required.
12.06
��
MINIMIIM OIIALTFICATIONS:
, ..:::..::::::..:::::: .::.�,:.:::: :.::::::.::...::.� ...:::::..:.:..: ..;:::._::::<:.:..::::.:_ ..::-�::: :.::.::::_:.;:....::;;
<�::<��;��<:>:<:»>:<;�:��<�:<:`::::o�'::::::>Frzci:� e: :::::>���c�:an��;_:::�:=:::
...........................:: ��::::::::.�:::: ::.�:_.-::�=:.-_�= --:y::.:���:�:�:::_::::�.:::::� :..::._::-:-:.......
2. Class B Commercia:l Driver's License.
3. Experience in electric and gas welding.
4. Two (2) years of applicable experience in gas and/or diesel
engine maintenance and repair of a variety of light and heavy
equipment.
5. One (1) year of technical college course work (51 quarter
credits) in automobile or diesel mechanics or certification
as a Master Automotive Technician by the National Institute
for Automotive Services Excellence. One year of applicable
experience can be substituted for up to seventeen (17) quarter
credits.
6. Ability to read, understand, and follow written and oral
instructions in English, including safety notices and
maintenance manua:Ls.
7. Ability to meet the physical.demands of the job as indicated
in the Job Activity Requirements with or without reasonable
acGOmmodations.
8. Minnesota Department of Motor Vehicle Certified to perform
annual equipment :inspeetion. - "
DESIRED OUALIFICATIONS::
l. Class A Commercial. Driver`s License with trailer endorsement.
2. Skills of a qualified automotive mechanic with considerable
additional experience on a variety of light and heavy
equipment. .
3. Skill in testing a:nd locating defects in mechanical equipment.
4. Skill in the use of electric and gas welding.
5. Considerable know]Ledge of the principles of the operation of
gasoline and diesE�l engines, both large and small.
6. Ability to adapt available tools.-and repair parts to specific
problems. �
January 1995
12.07
i�
UNIFORM BASELINE AND SETTLEMENT FORM
Minnesota Statute 179A.04, subdivision 3, paragraph (n) requires
completion �of a Uniform Settlement Form (Form). The Form is
applicable to contract negotiations between exclusive repre—
sentatives and all public employers, other than Townships. The
Bureau of Mediation Services (Bureau) is charged with developing
the Form and related instructions for compliance with the statute.
Pursuant to that charge, the Bureau has adopted the attached Form
and instructions to meet the requirements of this legisiation.
The Form is not intended to be a report of a public employer's
labor costs or a substitute for the costing by labor or management
of their collective bargaining proposals. Its purpose is limited
to fulfilling the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 179A.04,
subdivision 3, paragraph (n). It is the intention of this
legislation to provide a standard basis for public employers and
the public to compare the economic elements of collective
, �bargaining settlements.
The attached Form must be presented to the governing body of each
public employer at the time it ratifies a collective bargaining
contract. The Form must be available for public inspection during
normal business hours within five (5) calendar days after
ratification by the public employer.
6-2-94 - 1 - •
12.08
II �
a
I �
C
Z
, �
u
�
V
A
�
�
O
A
Y
\ �
I � �
v �
� �
A
m
� d
O M
J
,.
>
<
i
W
W
�
�
�
�
J
X
W
V
n
a
�.
Q
H
�
W
�
�
�
O
Z
�_
�
O
d
A
�
R
4J
�
O
O
N �
Y
=
� 0
.�.
�
W
I �
A
m
A
}
�
N
v d
S � l. ..
� 8 >E m
N o N .-. �� �C �O
W.O �O y O...Ci
0�9
3`v 3.. `-°� �'vo
x f0 =
�a£, a� �X� �nv�
N O N� p�` H K'
3 $' 3 > � � � � o
Z� Z� Z V Z.� V
I
Q O]
�. � V1 V1
� � C
� �
u �g °�'o
� � .�.
3 �� y�.�
A C
m m V m� V
d �
7 7
L � � � N
V n U� j M M
N �..� V7 � " V
Q1
rl � !n �� QC!
3� 3 "� v��
V O � _ O
1) y ,J 71 V�t J N C! J
yi o w� w;o Hz�
� a� o � c 3 � c
Z � Z� Z V Z � U
� N N
Q�
N V C
v �
� A O � d O
3 � ; „ ;, '�
y :O N C.0
� � � jp ��
A a O e'"e p O
m mV m.�V
' o
y O .-,
'p N M R V1 �D �j 1� W C O� ^ 1�
V�O y �O �O a0 �D �O �O �D �
'c� C � •� C L C L C ec
< O J H� W O� O N w C C R � W
.3i�i 3U w�.0 o ..�..10 �c ..�. C�+�^ rm SE
v,` v,q w` �na�i w� wQ w�j� � Zm V E ��
N N � N W N a1 ~ d 7 d O `� �j O � O a� � N
ZS Z� ZS ZO Z V ZU Z� V t°- � r�n
fV M 'C �/f � I� OJ 01
N h N � � � N h
• � o o �
m
u A . •
� U d U � V � C �!0 � C L„" C • q A
�` p` �� vsia, �i ,', �o, O°a rm
� 3� `' d'� y E 9{ E E �:?
m 5 m � m 5 m O m U m U m� V m ti
0
N ^ � "
'd < N CA �D C W
A r�'1 �V 'C R . •f �/ V � C � � V
V � ea y �
�C C ` �. � .d C L C u� C }
< O J� - N W O� O � H C d Cl �G
m� io � m p y ' c e� p N
� U � V � V � C .� = � C- � 0 C d q L m � C
wR w` wR wv v+� wp. w a Zm V E �a;
�i� a3i� a� ��`v- �` �E �� E mE o�°O :°v°'i
Z C Z� Z� Z � Z�.i Z V Z 4�. U F� O F M
� O N M 7 �n �D
N M M f�1 M N1 M M
-a C C y
io • y O O �
V A ' � •
dU C C� d r� � .W N d •y Ol
c d� �� r� X=° v� ro� v�
< p O` J` N d W{�j O Q. O C } m
3�'� �� °7� 9t� ��` $E �E �. �;:?
�o C �� A C - 'o ea 7 'o O ea p O �e p
m m o m� m V m V mLL V mi—
A`
v�
�� � o � � 0 0
= �. +h
� �,
o� > >
" '° E �� N �
o � .
H� N � 7^ ry�O I� �
�` v^ d �' c �^ �^
� q � y 0� � d �
3� 3 �o ::�`o_ � � �
(n N 1] y .D d N 7 N 71 •7 ..�. U ..�. V � V
L r' � w y r+ ;a w�� " y` w` �+ �
•� °1 3c. 3> 3c 3'0c 3� 3� 3�
� � Z� Z� Z U Z� V Z� Z � Z �
� � � � � d �':
u� � � �� N
$ t � M � �.
� "'a
m� ?-� �
� �, •- � ,� w
.` � �
-.
N
n �{pp� O � � O " y
C/ C N pl
3 Vj d y�'fl � C Q C J C
' � a� „ c y't°� c d 3 N� `
10 �a �o O �o p O �o '^ ' �o N A �
._ o m mu m�u m5 m� m5
�
o A
� `
��`�
���
'p �
� N �/ N N �t"1 fV V1
C N N
A �
... 1` � C L- C. v� C �
N W �0 � O � N C C�•0♦w } C
�? y �y v c n d
.P 'c �= � c 3 c a3i `° m � E
wd �n� wn w� a Zm V E LL d
3` 3'� 3E 3�E �E a°O �ov
C� ._ N� c� O N � p 0 p � N
Z 0 Z U Z U Z ti U F- � \F- N
� N �
�_ p �
��
m o = ^
-p c c y
v O O C
.� •C � � � vroi L � y
y` W� �� � L } m
N ` A 7 � � I� . . , � �
m0 mV � � mF
0
M
N �
n
d
C p
T � d
c
a ^ ._
Vf T O� '
a
E
J
�
O
T �
O �
C �
� O
C H
ti ` N
d -
S �
N � O]
E
J
�
0
�
� N
N
>
� o
H
a � �
c
E � �
V1 e m
a
�
J
� C �.
�j � C a
� o�
����
ad�J�
•
I
�
0
� �
�
�
w
` L�
� O
Q �
v
�
�
�
�
r
W
�
�
�
�
�
1
W
�
�.t
0.
�
Z
�
}"'
V J
Z
W
G.
�
O
V
{�
O
V J
�
�
�
W
�
O
< �
� •+
Z v
� `
w ��
.�c
� { 1
„_ ly
>
�
�
X z
w �
�
�
V \
� i
W CG (
O °- W �
��Ou, I
W --� �u X ^ �
� � Q m v � ��
OC �. —� ( r-� .o
m W � � x
Z O
� Z W , � m
� X ( � °`
Z � z
�
� I�x
'�' ' h- X
U v Z m
O I��
� �� �
C.CJ w
U +
� �X
W m �
°x�W I
W W � � �
� � g O � I C �
���y. � Z C
Z � � O � � �
W C I U w
W
� I C �
+ F- X
Q v ' Z m
X ( � �
O Io�
°� v W
Q (
x
��oCm �I
OXa`� M O
W {,�y! � O �^ ` � � I Q
�}SW" � O `�� o �
� x
Z��O � � �I�m
J � d.
W ' V w
W �� W
} '
,� � o ° �- O p �-- �
°°�� +�i Mo O
m< W Z W Q (\�(�\\ •' \ � � I H N
C� 6W. � v "� \ I Ci '_'
�o�� ` �X
-� v Z o
z�os �... � ��?�
W Q •' � �I U Z
N
� '
QJ
0 Z � � � I
� �
� � � '� '� ' � `6 `� v
� I.
�N � .� � •Q U � Qv c
°W ° -�� v � o °' �� � I
�
�
�� v �W u0 ° a� � � o o N �
_ � 0 °' � o � .�c >. ° � `.... �. c
p�v F� cno �� mc � c� � �
i� N G x � in v w v
. O o � _ �\V1 °?Y � � � � � .� �
>.•— � p a � f
� �a � io ;n ro � ro O a�
�Q �i-- V � tn� J �.: �
■
UJ
�
V'
rn
co
�
RESCILIITION NO. - 1995
RESOLIITION AQTHORIZING SIGNING AN AGREEMENT
FOR CERTAIN EMP]�OYEEB REPRESENTED BY INTLRNATIONAL
UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 49, AFL-CIO
(PUBLIC WORRS MAINTENANCE) FOR 1995 _.
WHEREAS, the Internatio;nal Union of Operating Engineers, Local No.
49, AFL-CIO, as bargain:ing representative for certain Public Works
Maintenance employees of the City of Fridley, has presented to the
City of Fridley various requests relating to the wages and working
conditions of employees of the Public Works Department of�the City
of Fridley; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fridley has presented to the designated
representatives of Loca.]. 49 various requests relating to the wages
and working conditions of employees of the Public Works.Department
of the City of Fridley;� and
WHEREAS, representativ��s of the Union and the City have met and
negotiated regarding the requests of the Union and the City; and
WHEREAS, agreement has now been reached between representatives of
the two parties on the proposed changes to the existing agreement
between the City and tlle Union;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED by the City of Fridley that such
agreement is hereby ratified and that the Mayor and City Manager
are hereby authorizeci to sign the attached Labor Agreement
including Appendix A, ��ppendix B, and Appendix C relating to wages
and working conditions of employees of the City of Fridley Public
Works Department.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY '.CHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THTS
TH DAY OF , 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CI:TY CLERK
y2.11.
LABOR AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
AND
THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
LOCAL NO. 49
AFL-CIO
1995
12.12
LABOR AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE GITY OF FRIDLEY
AND
THE INTERNATIO'.�TAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
_ LOCAL NO. 49
AFL-CIO
1995
Page
ARTICLE I PURPOSE OF AG�2EEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
ARTICLE II RECOGNITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
ARTICLE III UNION SECUR:CTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
ARTICLE IV EMPLOYER SECI7RITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
ARTICLE V EMPLOYER AUTH�RITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
ARTICLE VI EMPLOYEE RIGIKTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
ARTICLE VII DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
ARTICLE VIII SAVINGS CLAUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
ARTICLE IX WORK SCHEDULES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
ARTICLE X OVERTIME PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
ARTICLE XI CALL BACK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
ARTICLE XII LEGAL DEFENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
ARTICLE XIII RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
ARTICLE XIV DISCIPLINE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
ARTICLE XV SENIORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
ARTICLE XVI PROBATIONAF:Y PERIODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
ARTICLE XVII SAFETY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
ARTICLE XVIII JOB POSTI:NG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
12.13
ARTICLE XIX INSURANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
ARTICLE XX ANNUAL LEAVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
ARTICLE XXI SHORT TERM DISABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
ARTICLE XXII STANDBY PAY AND MINIMUM CALLBACK ........ 13
ARTICLE XXIII EMPLOYE EDUCATION PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . 13
ARTICLE XXIV FUNERAL PAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
ARTICLE XXV JURY PAY AND WITNESS FEES . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
ARTICLE XXVI MILITARY LEAVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
ARTICLE XXVII INCENTIVE PAY (LONGEVITY) . . . . . . . . . . . 15
ARTICLE XXVIII HOLIDAYS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
ARTICLE XXIX UNIFORMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
ARTICLE XXX REPRESENTATIVE OF AREA WIDE NEGOTIATIONS. .... 16
ARTICLE XXXI INSURANCE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
ARTICLE XXXII WAIVER. . . .� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lb
ARTICLE. XXXIII DURATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
APPENDIX A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
APPENDIX B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
APPENDIX C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
w
12.14
LABOR AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
AND
THE INTERNATI�DNAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
LOCAL NO. 49
AFL-CIO
ARTICLE I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT is ent:ered into between the CITY OF FRIDLEY,
hereinafter called the EMPLOYER, and the Local No. 49,.
International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, hereinafter
called the UNION.
It is the intent and purpose of the AGREEMENT to:
1.1 Establish certair.i hours, wages and other conditions of
employment;
1.2 Establish procedur�es for'the resolution of disputes concerning
this AGREEMENT'S ��nterpretation and/or application; and
1.3 Specify the full �and complete understanding of the parties;
and
1.4 Place in written form the parties' agreement upon terms and
conditions of emp]Loyment for the duration of this AGREEMENT.
The EMPLOYER and the UNION, through the AGREEMENT, continue
their dedication to the highest quality of public service.
Both parties reco�gnize this AGREEMENT as a pledge of this
dedication.
ARTICLE II. RECOGNITION
The EMPLOYER recognize:� the UNION as the exclusive representative
in a unit as certified by the Minnesota Bureau of Mediation
Services. �
ARTICLE III. UNION SE(:URITY
In recognition of the UNION as the exclusive representative, the
EMPLOYER shall:
1
;12.15
3.1 Deduct each payroll period an amount sufficient to provide the
payment of dues established by the UNION from the wages of all
employees authorizing in writing such deduction, and
3.2 Remit such deduction to the appropriate designated officer of
the UNION.
3.3 The UNION may designate certain employees from the bargaining
unit to act as stewards and shall inform the EMPLOYER in
writing of such choice.
3.4 The UNION agrees to indemnify and hold the EMPLOYER harmless
against any and all claims, suits, orders, or judgments
brought or issued against the CITY under the provisions of
this Article.
ARTICLE IV. EMPLOYER SECURITY
The UNION agrees that during the life of this AGREEMENT it will not
cause, encourage, participate in or support any strike, slow-down
or other interruption of or interference with the normal functions
of the EMPLOYER.
ARTICLE V. EMPLOYER AUTHORITY
5.1 The EMPLOYER retains the full and unrestricted right to
operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment;
' to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets;
to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and
modify the organizational structure; to select, direct, and
determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules
and to perform any inherent managerial function not
specifically limited by this AGREEMENT.
5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically
established or modified by this AGREEMENT shall remain solely
within the discretion of the EMPLOYER to modify, establish,
or eliminate.
ARTICLE VI. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS -- GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
6.1 DEFINITION OF A GRIEVANCE
A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the
interpretation or application of the specific terms and
conditions of this AGREEMENT.
6.2 UNION REPRESENTATIVES
The EMPLOYER will recognize REPRESENTATIVES designated by the
UNION as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit
having the duties and responsibilities established by the
�
12.y6
Article. The UNION shall notify the EMPLOYER in writing of
the names of such UNION REPRESENTATIVES and of their
successors when sc> designated.
6.3 PROCESSING OF A GF:IEVANCE
It is recvgnized and accepted by the UNION and the EMPLOYER
that the processirig of grievances as hereinafter provided is
limited by job dut:ies and responsibilities of the EMPLOYEES
and shall therefc�re be accomplished during normal working
hours only when consistent with such EMPLOYEE duties and
responsibilities. The aggrieved EMPLOYEE and the UNION
REPRESENTATIVE shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time
without loss in �pay when a grievance is investigated and
presented to the E]KPLOYER during normal working hours provided
that the EMPLOYEE and the UNION REPRESENTATIVE have notified
and received the a.pproval of the designated supervisor who has
determined that s�uch absence is reasonable and would not be
detrimental to thE, work programs of the EMPLOYER.
6.4 PROCEDURE
Grievances, as defined by Section 6.1, shall be resolved in
conference with the following procedure:
Step l.
An EMPLOYEE claiming a violation concerning the interpretation
or application of this AGREEMENT shall, within twenty-one (21)
calendar days af�ter such alleged violation has occurred,
present such grievance to the EMPLOYEE'S supervisor as
designated by t:he EMPLOYER. The EMPLOYER-designated
representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step
1 grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A
grievance not resc�lved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall
be placed in wr-iting setting forth the nature of the
grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision of
provisions of the AGREEMENT allegedly violated, and the remedy
requested and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10)
calendar days aft�er the EMPLOYER-designated representative's
final answer in St:ep 1. Any grievance not appealed in writing
to Step 2 by tl:�e UNION within ten (10) days shall be
considered waived.
Step 2.
If appealed, the �written grievance shall be presented by the
UNION and discu��sed with the EMPLOYER-designated Step 2
representative. 7Che EMPLOYER-designated representative shall
give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S Step 2 answer in writing within
ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance.
A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3
3
12.17
within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER-
designated representative's final Step 2 answer. Any
grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the UNION
within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived.
Step 3.
If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the
UNION and discussed with the EMPLOYER-designated Step 3
representative. The EMPLOYER-designated representative shall
give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S answer in writing within ten
(10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance.
A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4
within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER-
designated representative's final answer in Step 3. Any
grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the UNION
within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived.
Step 4.
A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed in Step.4 shall
be submitted to the Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services.
A grievance not resolved in Step.4 may be appealed to Step 5
within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER'S final
answer in Step 4. Any_grievance not appealed in writing.to
5tep 5 by the UNION. within ten (10) calendar days shall be
considered waived.
5tep 5.
A grievance unresolved in Step 4 and appealed in Step 5 shall
be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the.
Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971, as amended.
If the parties cannot agree upon an arbitr.ator the selection
of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rule�
Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the
Public Emgloyment Relations Board.
6.5 ARBITRATOR'S AUTHORITY
A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modif.y,
nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the terms and
conditions of this AGREEMENT. The arbitrator shall
consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted
in writing by the EMPLOYER and the UNION, and shall have
no authority to make a decision on any other issue(s� not
so submitted.
B. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions
contrary to or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying
in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations
having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's
4
12.18
decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30)
days followin�g the close of the hearing or the submission
of briefs by �the parties, whichever be later, unless the
parties agree: to an extension. The decision shall be
binding on both the EMPLOYER and the UNION and shall be
based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or
application c�f the express terms of this AGREEMENT and
to the facts of the grievance presented.
C. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and
proceedings s;hall be borne equally by the EMPLOYER and
the UNION pro�vided that each party shall be responsible
for compensat.ing its own representatives and witnesses.
If either party desires a verbatim record. of the
proceedings, it may cause such- a record to be made,
� providing it ;pays for the record. If both parties desire
a verbatim re�cord of the proceedings., the cost shall be
shared .equall.y.
6.6 WAIVER
If a grievance is Yiot presented within limits .set forth above,
it shall be considered "waived". If a grievance is not
appealed_to the nE�xt step within the specified time limit or
any agreed extens�_on thereof, it shall be considered settled
on the basis of trie EMPLOYER'S last answer. If the EMPLO�tER
does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the
specified time 1�Lmits, the UNION may elect to treat the
grievance as deniEad at that step and immediately appeal the
grievance to the.next step. The time limit in each step may
be extended by mut�ual agreement of the EMPLOYER and .the UNION.
6.7 CHOICE OF REMEDY
If, as a result of the EMPLOYER response in Step 4, the.
grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves
the suspension, de:motion, or discharge of an employee who has
completed the requ�ired probationary period, the grievance may
be appealed to St�ep 5 of Article VI or a procedure such as:
Civil Service, Vei;eran's Preference, or Fair Employment. If
appealed to any procedure other than Step 5 of Article VI, the
grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as
provided in Step 5 or Article VI. The aggrieved employee
shall indicate in writing which procedure is to be utilized
(Step 5 or ArticlE� VI or another appeal procedure) and shall
sign a statement to the effect that the choice.of any other
hearing preclude:a the aggrieved employee from making a
subsequent appeal through Step 5 of Article VI.
5
12.19
ARTICLE VII. DEFINITIONS
7.1 UNION
The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49,
AFL-CIO.
7.2 EMPLOYER
The City of Fridley.
7.3 UNION MEMBER
A member of the International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local 49, AFL-CIO.
7.4 EMPLOYEE
A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit.
7.5 BASE RATE OF PAY
The Employee's hourly pay rate exclusive of longevity or any
other special allowance.
7.6 SENIORITY
Length of continuous service in any job classifications
covered by ARTICLE II -- RECOGNITION. Employees who are
promoted from job classification covered by this AGREEMENT and
return to a job classification covered by the AGREEMENT shall
have their seniority calculated on their length of service
under this AGREEMENT for purposes of promotion, transfer and
lay off and total length of service with the EMPLOYER for
other benefit under this AGREEMENT.
7.7 SEVERANCE PAY
Payment made to an employee upon honorable�termination of
employment.
7.8 OVERTIME
Work performed at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER
in excess of either eight (8) hours within a twenty-four (24)
hour period (except for shift changes) or more than forty (40)
hours within a seven (7) day period.
7.9 CALL BACK
Return of an employee to a specified work site to per€orm
assigned duties at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER
r,
�
y 2.2�
at a time other than an assigned shift. An extension of or
early report to an assigned shift is not a call back.
7.10 STANDBY PAY
Compensation for standing by at the City's request, or being
available for work on days that are normally considered to be
employee's day off.
ARTICLE VIII. SAVINGS CLAUSE
The AGREEMENT is subje�ct to the laws of the United States, the
State of Minnesota and the signed municipality. In the event any
provision of this AGREE]MENT shall be held to be contrary to law by
a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgement or
decree no appeal has k>een taken within the time provided, such
provisions shall be voi�3ed. All other provisions of the AGREEMENT
shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may
be renegotiated at the request of either party.
ARTICLE IX. WORK SCHECiULES
9.1 The sole authority in work schedules is the EMPLOYER. The
normal work day fo:r an employee shall be eight (8) hours. The
normal work week shall be forty (40) hours Monday through
Friday.
9.2 Service to the pub:Lic may require the establishment of regular
shifts for some employees on a daily, weekly, seasonal, or
annual basis oth��r than the normal 8:00-4:30 day. The
EMPLOYER will give seven (7) days advance notice to the
employees affectedlby the establishment of work days different
from the employee"s normal eight (8) hour work day.
9.3 In the event that work is required because of unusual
circumstances such as (but not limited to) fire, flood, snow,
sleet, or breakdo��n of municipal equipment or facilities, no
advance notice ne.ed by given. It is not required that an
employee working other than the normal workday be scheduZed
to work more than the eight (8) hours; however, each employee
has an obligation to work oveztime or call backs if requested
unless unusual c:Lrcumstances prevent the employee from so
working.
9.4 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular
work weeks that s�:hedule work on Saturdays and/or Sundays.
ARTICLE X. OVERTIME P,AY
10.1 Hours worked in ex:cess of eight (8) hours within a twenty-four
(24) hour period (except for shift changes) or more than forty
(40) hours within a seven (7) day period will be compensated
7
12.21
for at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee's regular
base pay rate.
10.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable.
10.3 Overtime refused by employees will for record purposes under
ARTICLE 10.2 be considered as unpaid overtime worked.
10.4 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime
hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded, or paid twice
for the same hours worked.
ARTICLE XI. CALL BACK
An employee called in for work at a time other than the employee's
normal scheduled shift will be compensated for a minimum of two (2)
hours' pay at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee's base
pay rate.
ARTICLE XII. LEGAL DEFENSE
12.1 Employees involved
ignorance of laws,
employee judgmental
the municipality.
in litigation because of negligence,
non-observance of laws,or as a result of
decision may not receive legal defense by
12.2 Any employee who is charged with a traffic violation,
ordinanee violation or criminal offense arising from acts
performed within the scope of the employee's employment, when
such act is performed in good faith and under direct order of
the employee's supervisor, shall be reimbursed for reasonable
attorney's fees and court costs actually incurred by such
employee in defending against such charge.
ARTICLE XIII. RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT
Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall prohibit or restrict the right of
the EMPLOYER from subcontracting work performed by employees
covered by this AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE XIV. DISCIPLINE
14.1 The EMPLOYER will discipline employees only for just cause.
14.2 An employee(s) will not be required to participate in an
investigatory interview by the EMPLOYER where the information
gained from the interview could lead to the discipline of the
employee(s) unless the employee(s) is given the opportunity
to have a third party or the Union Representative present at
the interview to act as a witness for the employee(s).
8
12.22
ARTICLE XV. SENIORITY
15.1 Seniority will be the determining criterion for transfers,
promotions and lay-offs only when all job-relevant
qualifications factors are equal.
15.2 Seniority will be the determining criterion for recall when
the job-relevant �qualification factors are equal. Recall
rights under this ��rovision will continue for twenty-four ( 24 )
months after lay off. Recalled employees shall have ten (10)
working days after notification of recall by registered mail
at the employee's last known address to report to work or
forfeit all recall rights.
ARTICLE XVI. PROBATION'ARY PERIODS
16 .1 Every newly hired c�r rehired employee will serve a twelve { 12 )
month probationary period.
16.2 Every employee wi].l serve a twelve (12) month probationary
period in any job alassification in which the employee has not
served a probatioruary period.
16.3 At any time during� the probationary period, a newly hired or
rehired employee �iay be terminated at the sole discretion of
the EMPLOYER.
16.4 At any time durir�g
reassigned .employee
employee's previotzs
EMPLOYER.
ARTICLE XVII. SAFETY
the probationary period, a promoted or
may be demoted or reassigned to the
position at the sole discretion of the
The EMPLOYER and the UNION agree to jointly promote safe and
healthful working cond:itions, to cooperate in safety matters and
to encourage employees to work in a safe manner.
ARTICLE XVIII. JOB PO;iTING
18.1 The EMPLOYER and t,he UNION agree that permanent job vacancies
within the design,ated bargaining unit shall be �illed based
on the concept o� promotion or transfer from within provided
that applicants:
28.21 have the necessary qualifications to meet the
standards of the job vacancy; and
18.12 have tlhe ability to perform the
respons:ibilities of the job vacancy.
E
12.23
duties and
18.2 Employees fiiling a higher job class based on the provisions
of the ARTICLE shall be subject to the conditions of ARTICLE
XVI (PROBATIONARY PERIOD).
18.3 The EMPLOYER has the right of final decision in the selection
of employees to fill posted jobs based on qualifications,
abilities and experience. -
18.4 Job vacancies within the designated bargaining unit will be
posted for five (5) working days so that members of the
bargaining unit can be considered for such vacancies.
ARTICLE XIX. INSURANCE
19.1 The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum o� three hundred
forty-�ive dollars ($345.00) per month per EMPLOYEE toward
group health and life insurance for EMPLOYEES choosing
dependent coverage for calendar year 1995.
19.2 The EMPLOYER will contribute up to a maximum of two hundred
ten dollars ($210.00) per month per EMPLOYEE toward group
health and life insurance for EMPLOYEES choosing single
coverage for calendar year 1995.
19.3 By mutual agreement EMPLOYEES may use fifteen dollars ($15.00)
of the per month per employee of health insurance dollars in
19.1 and 19.2 for dental insurance for all unit EMPLOYEES.
19.4 EMPLOYEES not choosing dependent coverage cannot be covered
at EMPLOYER expense for any additional insurance than the
individual group health and group life insurance. Additional
l i fe insurance can be purchased by EMPLOYEES at the EMPLOYEE' S
expense to the extent allowed under the EMPLOYER'S group
policy.
ARTICLE XX. ANNUAL LEAVE
20.1 Each employee shall be entitled to annual leave away from
employment with pay. Annual leave may be used for scheduled
or emergency absences from employment. Annual leave pay shall
be computed at the regular rate of pay to which such an
employee is entitled; provided, however, that the amount of
any compensation shall be reduced by any payment received by
the employee from workers' compensation insurance, Public
Employees Retirement Association disability insurance,.or
Social Security disability insurance. An employee's
accumulation of annual leave will be reduced only by the
amount of annual leave for which the employee receives
compensation.
10
, 12.24
�
�
20.2 Seniority shall apply on scheduled annual leave up to May lst
of each year. AftE.r May lst, scheduled annual leave shall be
on a first come, first served basis.
20.3 A beginning employEae shall accrue annual leave at the rate of
eighteen (18) days per year for the first seven (7) years (84
successive months). An employee who has worked seven (7)
years (84 successiwe months) shall accrue annual leave at the
rate of twenty-four (24) days per year, beginning with the
eighty-fifth (85t1i) month of successive employment. An
employee who has �aorked fifteen (15) years (180 successive
months) shall accr�ue annual leave at the rate of twenty-six
(26) days per ��ear, beginning with the one hundred
eighty-first (181st) month of consecutive employment. These.
rates are based on a forty (40) hour regular work week. The
actual amount credited to an employee in any given pay period
shall be prorated according to the actual number oE regular
hours worked dur:ing that pay period. Hours worked on
overtime, callbaclk, or standby shall not enter into the
calculation of the accrual of annual leave.
20.4 For an employee hired on or after July 1, 1983:
The maximum total accumulation of annual leave at the erid of
any given year sha.11 be thirty (30) days. Once a year, at a
time designated b�� the City, an employee who has completed
seven (7) years of service with the City wiil have the
opportunity to exc:hange up to three (3) days of accumulated
annual leave for cash. At the sarne time, an employee who has
completed fifteen (15) years of service with the City will
have the opportuni.ty to exchange up to 5 days of accumulated
annual leave for c:ash.
20.5 For an employee hired before July 1, 1983:
Vacation accrued but unused as of June 30, 1983 shall be
converted to annual leave at the rate of one (1) day of annual
leave for one (1) day of vacation. Accrued but unused sick
leave as of June _�0, 1983 shall be converted to annual ieave
according to the f:ollowing schedule:
a. 1st 45 days @ 1 day of annual leave for 1 day of sick
leave
b. 2nd 45 days i@ 1 day of annual leave for 2 days of sick.
leave
c. Remainder @ 1 day of annual leave for 3 days of sick
leave.
In lieu of severance pay, one hour of annual leave shall be
credited for each full month of employment up to a maximum of
two hundred forty (240) hours.
11
12.25 .
The total amount of annual leave credited to the employee's
balance as of July 1, 1983 shall be equal to accrued but
unused vacation plus the amount in lieu of severance pay.
If upon conversion to the annual leave plan an employee's
accumulation of annual leave exceeds thirty (30) days, that
amount shall be the maximum total accumulation (cap) for that
employee at the end of any subsequent year.
Once a year; at a time designated by the City, an employee
will have the opportunity to exchange up to five (5) days of
accumulated annual leave for cash.
In addition, once a year at a time designated by the City, an
employee with an accumulation of annual leave in excess of
thirty (30) days will have the opportunity to exchange up to
five (5) days of annual leave for cash. Such an exchange
shall reduce the maximum total accumulation (eap) of an
employee by an equal amount.
20.6 Upon separation from employment with the City, an employee
will be paid one (1) day's salary for each day of accrued
annual leave remaining in the employee's balance.
ARTICLE XXI. SHORT TERM DISABILITY
21.1 Each employee who has successfully completed the employee's
probationary period shall b.e eligible for the short term
disability benefit. Such an employee shall be entitled to
full pay commencing on the twenty-first (21stj consecutive
working day on which the employee is absent due to a
physician-certified illness or injury off the job, and
continuing until the employee returns to work able to carry
out the full duties and responsibilities of the employee's
position or through the one hundred and tenth (110th) working
day of absence, whichever occurs first. Such an employee
shall also be entitled to full pay commencing on the eleventh
(llth) consecutive working day on which the employee is absent
due to a physician-certified illness or injury on the job and
continuing until the employee returns to work able to carry
out the duties and responsibilities of the employee's position
or through the one hundredth (100th) working day of absence,
whichever occurs first. The amount of any compensation for
the short term disability benefit shall be reduced by any
payment received by the disabled employee from workers'
compensation insurance, Public Employees Retirement Associa-
tion disability insurance, or Social Security disability
insurance. Payment of short term disability benefit by the
City to an employee shall not exceed ninety {90) working days
for any single illness or injury, regardless of the number and
spacing of episodes. The annual leave_balance of an employee
receiving short term disability benefit shall not be reduced,
12
� 2.2s
nor shall such e:mployee accrue annual leave during that
period.
21.2 Before any short t��rm disability payments are made by the City
to an employee, �the City may request and is entitled to
receive a certificate signed by a competent physician or other
medical attendant certifying to the fact that the entire
absence was, in fact, due to the illness or injury and not
otherwise. The �City also reserves the right to have an
examination made at any time of any empZoyee claiming payment
' under the short te�rm disability benefit. Such examination may
be made on behal.f of the City by any competent person
designated by the City when the City deems the same to be
reasonably necessa.ry to verify the illness or injury claimed.
21.3 If an employee l-iired before July 1, 1983, has received
payments under tl.ze injury-on-duty provisions of previous
contracts, the nuniber of days for which payment was received
will be deducted :From the number of days of eligibility for
coverage under shc�rt term disability for that same injury.
ARTICLE XXII. STANDBY PAY AND MINIMUM CALLBACK FOR STANDBY
EMPLOYEE:S
22.1 Employees who are designated by the City Manager to serve in
a"standby" status on behalf of the City on a Saturday, Sunday
or Holiday will r��ceive as compensation for such service as
"standby" two (2) hours of overtime pay for each day served
in such status.
22.2 Employees requireci to "standby" during the week will receive
as compensation f�or such service four (4) hours pay at the
overtime rate.
22.3 If on any such da�y the Employee on "standby" shall actually
perform work for t:he City, the Employee shall be entitled to
compensation for e:ach hour or portion thereof actually worked
at the overtime rate of pay, which shall be in addition to the
standby pay.
22.4 An Employe
work shall
performing
e who is on standby and is called out to perform
be pai.d a minimum of one (1) hour overtime for
such wc�rk.
ARTICLE XXIII. EMPLOYF,E EDUCATION PROGRAM
23.1 The City will pa�� instructional costs up to a maximum �f
$2,250 per employe:e per year for training courses relevant to
the EMPLOYEE'S present or anticipated career responsibilities
at City-approved institutions. The City will pay fifty
percent (500) of the cost of tuition in advance and the
EMPLOXEE will pay the other fifty percent (50%). The EMPLOYEE
13
� 2.2%
will be required to present to his/her Department Manager a
certification of satisfactory work when the course is
completed.
a. Courses issuing a letter grade: a"C" or above is
required.
b. Courses issuing a numerical grade: a 70 percent grade
is required.
c. Courses not issuing a grade: a certification from the
instructor certifying that the student has satisfactorily
participated in the activities of the courses is
required.
23.2 If the EMPLOYEE satisfactorily completes the course, the
EMPLOYEE will be reimbursed for the additional fifty percent
(500) of the tuition as well as for the cost of required books
or educational materials and required fees related to the
course. The City will not reimburse the EMPLOYEE for fe�s
which are charged for instruction, associated administrative
expense, student membership, student health coverage and other.
charges for which the EMPLOYEE receives some item or service
not directly related to the course of instruction.
23.3 The City will not reimburse the EMPLOYEE for expenses
reimbursed under some other education system or program, e.g.
G.I. Bill.
ARTICLE XXIV. FUNERAL PAY
In case of death occurring in the immediate family of an Employee,
such an Employee may be excused from work for up to three (3) days
with additional time off granted by the City Manager if additional
time is needed. This time off shall not subject the.Employee to
loss of pay. For this purpose, members of the immediate family of
the Employee are considered to be the following: spouse,.child
(Natural or adopted), parent, grandparent, brother, sister,
mother-in-law or father-in-law.
ARTICLE XXV. JURY PAY AND WITNESS FEES
An Employee who has been duly summoned for jury duty in any court,
or who has been duly summoned as a witness in any proceeding, shall
be excused from work in accordance therewith. Such employee shall
be entitled to receive as pay a sum of money equal to the
difference between what the Employee received as compensation for
such jury duty or witness fees, and the Employee's regular pay.
14
12.28
ARTICLE XXVI. MILITARY' LEAVE
Any Employee absent fr��m work in accordance with the order of a
duly established mil:Ltary authority shall receive pay and
compensation during suc:h absence as is provided by State Law.
ARTICLE XXVII. INCENTI:VE PAY (LONGEVITY)
Incentive Pay will be paid over and above the base rate of pay for
employees permanently hired prior to March 31, 1973 according to
the following schedule: �
After 5 years of f>ervice:
After 10 years of Service:
After Z5 years of Service:
2-1/2� of base salary rounded
to the nearest dollar amount
5% of base salary rounded to the
nearest dollar amount.
7-1/2� of base salary rounded
to the nearest dollar amount.
The City of Fridley has agreed to pay incentive pay to Employees
hired prior to March 31, 1973, in recognition of their prior
service and contributic�n to the City of Fridley. Neither the City
nor the UNION will atte�mpt to take away longevity or incentive pay
for those persons hi:red prior to March 31, 1973, in future.
contracts. The amount of incentive pay for eligible Employees will
be negotiated for the �ffected Employees.
ARTICLE XXVIII. HOLID;AYS
The EMPLOYER will prov.ide eleven (11) paid holidays.
In addition, employees shall be paid at one and one-half (1-1/2)
times their base rate of pay for all hours worked on eleven (11)
City designated holida�ys.
ARTICLE XXIX. UNIFORM:S
The City of Fridley will furnish uniforms to Employees of the
bargaining unit free o:E charge to the Employee. The City reserves.
the right to select thca type of uniform to be furnished. The Ci.ty
will agree to furnish rain equipment and special safety equipment
for all Employees.
ARTICLE XXX. REPRESENTATIVE ON AREA WIDE NEGOTIATIONS
If the UNION chooses to use one of the personnel from the Fridley
work force as a represe�ntative on the area wide bargaining unit for
more than one year in three, Local No. 49 will pay the salary of
such Employee for the second year for the time spent on area wide
15
12.29
negotiations. The purpose is to spread the cost of such
negotiation among the several communities involved in joint
negotiations.
ARTICLE XXXI. INSURANCE
The City will provide group term life insurance with a maximum of
$25,000 per Employee and additional accidental death and disability
insurance with a maximum of $25,000 per Employee. Provided that
the total City cost for all insurance premiums does not exceed the
amount set forth in ARTICLE XIX.
ARTICLE XXXII. WAIVER
32.1 Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices,
policies, rules and regulations regarding terms and conditions
of employment, to the extent inconsistent this the provisions
of this AGREEMENT, are hereby superseded.
32.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations
which resulted in this AGREEMENT, each had the unlimited right
and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to
any term or condition of employment not removed by law from
bargaining. Al1 agreements and understandings arrived at by
the parties are set forth in writing in this AGREEMENT for the
stipulated duration of the AGREEMENT. The EMPLOYER and the
UNION each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to
meet and negotiate regarding any and all terms and conditions
of employment referred to or covered in this AGREEMENT or with
respect to any term or condition of employment not
specifically referred to or covered by this AGREEMENT, even
though suah terms or conditions may not have been within the
knowledge or contemplation of either or botYi of the parties
at the time this contract was negotiated or executed.
ARTICLE XXXIII. DURATION
The AGREEMENT shall be effective as of January 1, 1995 and shall
remain in full force and effect until the 31st day of December,
1995.
16
12.30
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT
on this day of , 1995.
FOR THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF
OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 49,
AFL-CIO
/�� �� - � -/ � � �
-• �- •
/
/i�L�[� //�i:L.%'
• �%",�.-._Tit`_�4,"'�'_.f:�,�` - �:
�"ohn M. Schouveller, Re�cording Secretary
��
Tim R. Connors, Business Representative
FOR THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
William J. Nee, Mayor
9�I.'�'.+.1,-
Wiiliam W. Burns, City lManager
I hereby recommend appr�oval of this agreement.
r
� � �
illiam C. Hunt - ssis�tant to the City Manager
�
John . Flora, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
17
w_:';�_,
�.
'.:12.31
r:'.
PSW-A.1
PSW-A.2
APPENDIR A
WAGES 1995
Public Services Worker (PSW)
Entry
After one (1) year of
satisfactory performance
in PSW-A classification
PSW-B.1 After two (2) years of
satisfactory performance
in PSW-A classification
and achievement of minimum
qualifications
PSW-B.2 After one (1) year of
satisfactory performance
in PSw-B classification
Hourly Rate
$11.21
$12.04
$12.89
$13.74
PSW-C After two (2) years of $14.58
satisfactory performance
in PSW-B classification
and achievement of minimum
qualifications
PSW-C $15.10
(Maintenance II in 1989)
PSW-D After five (5) years of
satisfactory performance
and achievement of minimum
qualifications
PSW-D
(Maintenance III in 1989)
$15.42
$15.72
Advancement to the next step will occur at the next regular pay
period following satisfactory completion of the time of service
requirement and achievement of minimum qualifications, if
pertinent.
Mechanic
Level
A
B
Person assigned to Lead Mechanic
Hourlv Rate
$ 14.58
$ 15.72
$ 16.35
SeasonalJTemporary Employees
Employees employed by the employer on a seasonal/temporary basis
for no more than 125 working days per calendar year either in a
full-time (more than 14 hours per week) or part-time capacity will
be compensated as determined by the employer for the term of this
employment. Such employees will not be eligible for any benefits
under the Agreement except those which may be required by law.
` 12.32
�8
APPENDIR B
PIII3LIC �ORRS MAINTENANCE
1NIINIMUM REQIIIREMENTS
Public Services Worker Level A Minimum Requirements
High School Diploma, GED or equivalent.
Valid Minnesota Class B� Driver's License.
Successful completion oi� City's physical examination including drug
testing, if required.
Ability to read, understand, and follow written and oral
instructions, including� safety rules..
Ability to meet the phy�sical demands of the job including but not
limited to lifting, ben�ding, climbing, reaching overhead, pushing
and pulling.
Ability to perform job responsibilities in climatic extremes.
Ability to perform rout:ine repair and maintenance tasks in one or
more of the following sections: Streets, Parks, Sewer, Water,
Vehicle Maintenance.
Ability to work coopera�tively as a member of a crew or team.
19
` 12.33
Public Services Worker Level B Minimum Requirements
Meets or exceeds all the minimum requirements of Public Services
Worker Level A
Completion of two (2) years of experience at Level A
Minnesota Class B driver's license or appropriate Commercial
Driver's License
Successful completion of all applicable City safety and hazardous
materials training
Safe work practices and safe driving record
Adherence to City's policies in regard to tardiness and sick leave.
Adherence to all other policies and procedures for City employees
Ability to deal effectively and tactfully with th� public
Good knowledge of location of streets and public facilities
Working knowledge of fundamental job duties
CERTIFICATION:
For Streets Workers: Ability to use non-motorized and small engine
types of equipment in area of job responsibilities
For Parks Workers: Minnesota Non-Commercial Pesticide/Herbicide
Applicator License/Certificate
For Sewer Workers: Class S-D Waste Water Operator's Certificate
For Water Workers: Class D Water Supply System Operator's
Certificate
For Mechanic's Helper: Demonstrated ability in the repair of small
engines and routine vehicle maintenance
20
12.34
iT
Public Services'Worker Level C Minimum Requirements
Meets or exceeds all tYie minimum requirements of Public Services
Worker Level B
Completion of two (2) years of experience at Level B -
Ability to work with minimum amount of on-site supervision
Good knowledge of all operations, preventive maintenance and
routine repair of equip��tent operated in area of job responsibility
Enrollment in a Public Works Certificate Program or other program
related to public works maintenance offered by a technical college
or community college with successful completion of one quarter of
course work (at least 16 quarter credits).
Good knowledge of inethods and materials used in area of job
responsibility
CERTIFICATION:
For Streets Workers: Completion of course work (at least three (3)
quarter credits), in-service training, or certification in one (1)
or more areas includin�g but not limited to the following areas:
bituminous technology a�nd repair, light equipment operation, tree .
trimming, traffic contY•ol, asphalt testing, si.gn making, pavement
marking, snow removal
For Parks Workers: In addition to Minnesota Non-Commercial
Pesticide/Herbicide �Applicator License/Certificate, successful
completion of a course at a technical college (at least 3 quarter
credits) or other cer�tification designated by the City after
consultation with Local. 49 in one (1) or more areas including but
not Yimited to the follc�wing: landscaping, irrigation, entomology,
forestry, turf maintenance, building maintenance and construction,
concrete finishing, ancl surveying ,
For Sewer Workers: Class S-C Waste Water Operator's Certificate
For Water Workers: Class C Water Supply System Operator's
Certificate
21
12.35
Public Services Worker Level D Minimum Requirements
Meets or exceeds all the minimum requirements of Public Services
Worker Level C
Completion of one (1) year of experience at Level C
Completion of a Public Works Certificate Program or other program
related to public works maintenance offered by a technical college
or community college with successful completion of three (3)
quarters of course work (at least 48 quarter c�edits), provided
that, during 1990 only, this requirement is waived for employees
in the Maintenance II classification on December 31, 1989, upon
achievement of ten years of service in the Public Works Maintenance
Division of the City
For sewer workers a Class S-B Waste Water Operator's Certificate
may be substituted for the education requirement.
For water workers a Class B Water Supply System Operator's
Certificate may be substituted for the education requirement.
Ability to work without direct on-site supervision and to make on-
site decisions related to task assignments
Broad knowledge of operational aspects of public works maintenance
department/division
CERTIFICATION:
For Streets Workers: Successful completion of a certified heavy
equipment training program or equivalent training and experience,
and completion of course work (at least three (3) quarter credits),
in-service training, or certification in two (2) or more areas
including but not limited to the following areas: bituminous
technology and repair, tree trimming, traffic control, asphalt
testing, sign making, pavement marking, snow removal, and basic
carpentry.
For Parks Workers: In addition to Minnesota Non-Commercial
Pesticide/Herbicide Applicator License/Certificate, successful
completion of a course at a technical college (at least 3 quarter
credits) or other certification designated by the City after
consultation with Local 49 in three (3) or more areas including but
not limited to the following: landscaping, irrigation, entomology,
forestry, turf maintenance, building maintenance and construction,
concrete finishing, and surveying
22
12.36
APPENDI% C
PIIF3LIC WORRS MAINTENANCE
ZSINIMUM REQUIREMENT3
Mechanic
Level A
High school diploma, GED, or equivalent.
Valid Minnesota Class B Driver's License or appropriate Commercial
Driver's License.
Successful completion o7E City's physical examination including drug
testing, if required.
Ability to read, uncierstand, and follow written and oral
instructions, including� safety rules.
Ability to meet the phy�sical demands of the job including but not
limited to lifting, ben�ding, climbing, reaching overhead, pushing,
and pulling.
Course work or experierice in diesel mechanics.
Experience in electric and gas welding.
Two ( 2) years of app:Licable e�cperience in auto ar�d/or diesel
maintenance and repair �with a variety of light and heavy equipment.
One (l} year of technical college course work (51 quarter credits)
in auto or diesel mechanics or certification as a Master Automotive
Technician by the National Institute for Automotive Service
Excellence. One additional year of applicable experience can be
substituted for up to :�eventeen (17) quarter credits.
Level B
Meets or exceeds all the minimum requirements of.Level A.
Three (3) years of applicable experience in auto and/or diesel
maintenance and repair with a variety of light and heavy equipment
or one (1) year experi�ance as Mechanic, Level A, with the City of
Fridley.
,
One (1) year of technic:al college course work (51 quarter credits)
in auto or diesel mechanics or certification as a Master Automotive
Technician by the Na�tional Institute for Automotive Service
Excellence.
23
1.2.37
CITY OF FRIDLEY
rViEMORANDOM
TO: WII.LIAM[ W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER ,�t
��
FROM: RICHARTI D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
WII.LIAM[ A. CHAMPA, CI'TY CLERK
SUBJECT: ACCEPTA►NCE OF PEITTIONS
DATE: FEBRUA�tY 6, 1995
On January 31, 1995, we accepted two petitions from Shirley Arbour, 125 76th Way
NE. One petition requeste�3 a"Dead End" street sign and the other requested
installation of a street light.
We have provided John Flora, Public Works Director, with copies of the petitions
and asked him to contact 1Vbrs. Arbour for specific details on her requests.
We ask that Council receive these two petitions at the ne�ct City Council meeting.
cc: John Flora, Public Wor��s Director
13.0 7
January 2, 1995
Fridley City Council:
We, the residents of 76th Way N.E., are peddoning for the installation of a Dead End street sign.
Thank you for taking the time to consider this pe6tion.
n`1�s S �.
� ����
�
�' �1,� � 6 � � ._ �,�'f P.t,lv
� . �
�� .
`-� �� ����
. �
r ��
_
� (� i%!�� `
����
, �
��� .
�� . . .
����./�,�.J✓ �- .
�-V
.��. ��
� �j G�--r-° / .
� ��
��
,
,.
��s � �'` �� /1 �
� 0� -�1�� VU 1U •� �
(Q� <���'�` ���-�� �
i17-�����%
�`�'
I 33 � 1c�`'�` WQ� W E
/ 3 3 7 (� �'` !�� j /�/�
s �-- ��-o�
s�� - �6��.
57� - ����
�%� "��� �
5�y-75�S5
��/- ��.��
I�-jI ��� " . s�--,, �23�i
�� .
i�,� �i.e�- � . : ��� ;,
. , �
. t� � � ; .�J,� � .-
�„ .�
� S� � ����
7?-7. f � �c
l�� ��� -
7 � �'1 �. , �'�
5���?���
i�2 s �l� �`� �t%
� ���� ���� � .
�
13.02
�:1. //
,5�7� � ? � �
��yi - �/ �� g
g ��- p � o c�
S�1��1�.�
�
Janu�ry 2, 1995
Fridley City Council:
We, the residents of 76th Way N.�'s., aze pe66oning for the installation of a street light ff possible, a light
installed on an existing pole across, from 125 76th Way would be preferred because of its central location.
Thank you for taking the time to cunsider this petition. � '
2S S �� Q� G,o1,c��- �S �o th l.i� i� � ��� a`� a 8�
� �
' U.� 57�-�6��
� :�����° ��2�+ �'� 10� --���' �� � � .
� � � �, - s�� - ����
� . - �, . _ -, � (� ��1 I� � �
:t
,
. ��
�;,,�� ���� - �
;��� , .
��-: ������` .
�� ���
� �� .
��
�
, �
I �-- .. ` - ^
�
(o� -
� - 7��'
ll �
i33 �b� �a
. `�
l�3 7��'y�.���
�
��� `�� �
� u � ��� �
�
�� � � � �
- �s�� �� �
��—
� ¢� �
`��- � �
I S� - � � � �'�;���.��
f;
13.03
��7h� -/�t'��
5�y -�5�5
�s�i_����.
��11 � �12�
�� 1 /
-�� �(
�-7, _ � � �.�
s,��,a �o�
��� �-� ��s
�
�
U�iYOF
FRIDLEY
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
�AS SERVICE�
M& D Ptumbing cY� Heating Inc
11050 26 St NE
St Michaet MN 55376
Melvin Daleiden
GENERAL CONTRACTOR-RESID NTIAL �
Olympia Construction Co Inc
2145 Long Lake Rd
New Brighton MN 55112 Lennie Benson
HEATING
Carlyle's Heating & AC
301 Ironton St NE
Fridley MN 55432 Steve Carlyle
M 8c D Plumbing & Hea.tin� Inc
11050 26 St NE
St Michael MN 55376 Melvin Daleiden
(�IL SERVICES
Combustion Heat and Power Inc
320 Chester St
St Paul MN 55107
PLUMBING
Krumholz Co
3 i0? Lyndale N
Minneapolis MN 55411
M& D Plumbing & Heating Inc
11050 26 Si NE
St Micha.el MN 55376
Zimco Specialdes Inc
3207 Hayes St NE
Minneapolis MN 55418
.I N �RFCTUR
Graphic House Inc
9204 Packer Dr
Wausau WI 54401
Harold Bauer
Harle_y E3elschlager
Melvin Daleiden
Steve Zimmer
Jennifer Dirks
7.�2
LICENSES
JOHN PALACIO
Chief Bldg Ofcl
STATE OF MINN
JOHN PAI,ACIO
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Same
JOHN PALACIO
Chief Bldg afcl
STATE OF MINi�T
Same
Same
30HN PALACIQ
Chief Bldg Ofci�
�
�
FOR CONCURREIVCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Propertv Address
6471-77 Riverview Terr NE
160 Mississippi Place NE
6711 Main Street NE
6480 Riverview Terr NE
450 75th Ave NE
476 75th Ave NE
1601 N.Innsbruck Dr #275
5846 2 1/2 St NE
1578-88 68th Ave NE
1566-76 68th Ave NE
1650-58 69th Ave NE
1630-40 69th Ave NE
1600-06 69th Ave NE
1590-96 69th Ave NE
1560-70 69th Ave NE
1673-83 68th Ave NE
1661-71 68th Ave NE
1653-59 68th Ave NE
1641-51 68th Ave NE
1633-39 68th Ave NE
1621-31 68th Ave NE
1613-19 68th Ave NE
1672-82 68th Ave NE
1565-77 68th Ave NE
1579-89 68th Ave NE
1591-97 68th Ave NE
1601-11 68th Ave NE
1590-96 68th Ave NE
1600-10 68th Ave NE
1612-18 68th Ave NE
1620-30 68th Ave NE
1632-38 68th Ave NE
1640-50 68th Ave NE
1652-58 68th Ave NE
1660-70 68th Ave NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #273
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #353
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #308
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #363
5400 Sth St NE
6361 Pierce St NE
140-42 Charles St NE
5770 2 1/2 St NE
5866 2nd St NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #374
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #178
5810-12 4th St NE
5335-37 6th St NE
5830 2nd St NE
Owner
Jelevazov, Chris
Jelevazov, Chris
Tasks Unlimited Lodges
Fragale, Edwazd/Melva
Holmquist Enterprises
Holmquist Enterprises
Schwieters and Associates
Herr, Robert W.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co:
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townliouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Ca
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Townhouse Co.
Rice Creek Towahouse Co.
Coz, James & Debbie
Lindberg Investments
Lindberg Investments
Lindberg Investments
Turcotte, Diana
Homer, Jacquelyn
Maleki, Mostafa
S & A Development
Maleid, Mostafa
Gosselin, Emmett/Lorraine
Gossetin, Emmett/L.orraine
Yueh, Maode '
Huber, Robert J.
Weatherly, John H.
17.03
LZCENSES
Units
3
4
2
1
10
11
1
6
6
6
5
6
4
4
6
6
6
4
6
4
6
4
6
6
6
4
6
4
6
4
6
4
6
4
6
2
2
2
11
4
1
1
1
1
4
Fee
$ 75.00
100.00
50.00
25.00
130.00
135.00
25.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
105.00
110.00
100.00
100.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
100.00
110.00
100.00
110.00
100.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
100.00
110.00
100.00
110.00
100.00
110.00
100.00
110.00
100.00
110.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
135.00
100.00
25.00
25.00
25.U0
25.00
100.00
�
�
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Property Address
6140-44 Star Lane NE
231 79th Way NE �
6540-50 East River Rd NE
5650 Polk St NE
5660 Polk St NE
1441 73rd Ave NE
5430 7th St NE
179 Charles St NE
101 Charles St NE
180 Charles St NE
217 57th Place NE
1441-43 Rice Creek Rd NE
4020-22 Main St NE
1560-64 73 1/2 Ave NE
6690 Lucia Lane NE
6680 Lucia Lane NE
6670 Lucia Lane NE
5370 Sth St NE
5370 4th St Ne
6671-81 Main St NE
4591-93 Main St NE
6389-91 Pierce St NE
6830 Brookview
5840-42 4th St NE
6061 2nd St NE
6060 2 1/2 St NE
5900 2 1/2 St NE
5600 6th St NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr NE #280
1601 N Innsbruck Dr NE #206
7361-63 University Av NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr NE #253
1601 N Innsbruck Dr NE #304
181 79th Way NE
6501 Channel Rd NE
6531 Channel Rd NE
7431-33 Able St NE
5420 Sth St NE
7320-22 Evert C.ourt NE
5131-35 3rd St NE
411-13 Ironton St NE
5121-23 3rd St NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr NE #119
7349-51 Able St NE
5606-06 6th St NE
5940 4th St NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr NE #126
Orvner
Lindberg, Vemon
Kuckes, Walter
KCS River Road East Corp
Mid Associates
Mid Assoeiates
Reshatar Systems
Morrow, Hazold D.
Schwartz, Nathau
Schwartz, Nathan
Schwartz; Nathan
Russell, Robert M.
�, c�y
Comelius, Forest
Kugler, Dennis
Hughes, Milton JBllen B
Hughes, Milton JBllen B
Hughes, Milton JBllen B
Welter, Lauretta H.
Kappes, Richard H.
Wintersteen, Daniel
Blomberg, Tom
Gadke, Carole Anne
Bradley, Floyd
Besch, Karen
Aaker, Herbert A.
Aaker, Herbert A.
Neis, Don
Wheeler, Timothy P
Cremisino, D/Pesek, D
Mackenthun, Steve/Sandy
Fay, Daniel C.
Maehle, Olav/Kristin
Maehle, Olav/Kristin
Highlife Management Co.
Czech, John
Czech, John �
Mayer, Marvey
Kurtz, Rinehart L.
Johnson, Gregg/Lois
Kociscak, Andrew
Thompson, Jerome/Raye
Billet, Kenney
Crohn, Mr & Mrs
Meinen, Stanley
Pearson, James
Zelenak, Mark/Beth
Woodworth, Duane
(2)
17,04
LICENSES
Units
2
7 --
141
16
16
18
34
12
12
12
1
1
1
2
16
16
16
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
4
4
7
2
1
1
2
1
1
8
4
4
1
4
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
Fee
$ 50.00
115.00
785.00
150.00
160.00
170.00
250.00
140.00
140.00
140.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
50.00
160.00
160.00
160.00
75.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
100.00
100.00
1i5.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
120.00
100.00
100.00
25.00
100.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
50.40
50.00
25.00
25.00
FOR CONCURREZICE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Propertv Address
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #362
5536-38 7th St NE
5955 3rd St NE
5820-22 4th St NE
120 Mississippi PI NE
5801 2nd St NE
6232-34 Sth St NE
5910 4th St NE
7893 Firwood Way NE
7091-93 Hickory Dr NE
7889-91 Firwood Way NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #208
5410 Sth St NE
5835 Main St NE
5860-62 4th St NE
5401 4th St NE
7367 Able St NE
539 Glencoe St NE
6061 3rd St NE .
276 58th Ave NE
6880 Brookview
6021 Main St NE
150 Island Park Dr NE
5419 4th St NE
5980 2 1/2 St NE
5450 Sth St NE
5791 2 1/2 St NE
5916-18 4th St NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #254
321 79th Way NE
7349-51 University Av NE
380-82 74th Avenue NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #201
7857-61 Firwood Way NE
7879-51 Firwood Way NE
1253 Hillwind Rd NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #186
5361-63 6th St NE
5371-73 6th St NE
5381-83 6th St NE
6430 Dellwood Dr NE
6542 Central Av NE
5940 East River Rd NE
1601 N Innsbrucic Dr #133
359 57th Piace NE
5900-02 4th St NE
5940-42 2nd St NE
Owner
Daniel Neujahr
Charles V. Westling
Alvin & Kathryn Rcesler
Beverly Mattson
Allan C. & Bev Mattson
Expert Realty Management
Joseph & Irene Maertens
Kenneth Ohnstad
Clazence/Lillian Fischer
A.P. & Tune Nichots.
John R. Zielinsld
Lyle Christie
Neil Schuldt
Auren Kemtop
�Iliam Guenther
Jim Weatherly
Reggie Truehl
Stuart W. Anderson
Richard & Nanci Anderson
Meyec & Joanne Broder
Janes & Joyce Vint
Richard & Suzanne Feist
John Ward - Wicklow Prop
John L. 7ensen
Dale & Bernadette Knott
Richard Tkaczik
Violet Rocek
Timothy Parker
R Erickson/P Reha
Auren Kerntop
Kenneth W. Johnson
CPG Enterprises
Leesa & Donald Betzold
Rodger & LaVearle Cazey
Kirylo & Zita Czichray
Allan & Pamela Fehn
Cheryl Cooper
Thomas Gliadon
Thomas Gliadon
Thomas Gliadon
John & Rebeka Chismar
Donald Topel
R. James Day
Roger & Janice Challtnan
William Toivonen
Roy E. Erickson
Robert A Hosmau
(3)
17.05
LZCENSES
Units
1
2
4
2
4
3
2
1
1
3
2
1
4
2
2
4
1
4
12
4
4
6
2
2
1
8
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
4
12
l
8
2
2
Fee
25.00
50.00
100.00
50.00
100.00
75.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
75.00
50.00
25.00
100.00
50.00
50.00
100.00
25.00
25.00
75.00
25.00
25.00
100.00
140.00
100.00
100.00
110.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
120.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
50.00
50.00
50..00
25.00
100.00
140.00
25.00
120.00
50.00
50.00
�
�
FOR CONCURRENCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Property Address
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #237
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #282
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #355
7699 Bacon Drive NE
7345-47 Evert Court NE
5644 4th St NE
7447-49 Able St NE
7463-65 Able St NE
421-423 Ironton St NE
1237-39 Norton Av NE
5461 4th St NE
6807 Hickory St NE
5816 2nd St NE
5141-43 3rd St NE
6530 2nd St NE
5612-14 6th St NE
5618-20 6th St NE
6551 2nd St NE
5260 3rd St NE
5261 3rd St NE
5291 3rd St NE
5290 3rd St NE
5230 3rd St NE
305 53rd Avenue NE
215 53rd Avenue NE
5201 3rd St NE
5200 3rd St NE
5231 3rd St NE
5100 Horizon Dr NE
5101 Horizon Dr NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #203
5924-26 4th St NE
117 Mississippi Pl NE
6111 Star Lane NE
349-53 57th Place NE
6051-55 3rd St NE
5451 Sth St NE
7313-15 Able St NE
6345 Pierce St NE
5780-90 2 1/2 St NE
1601 N Innsbruck Dr #316
59b0-80 Anna Ave NE
1619 73rd Ave NE
1200 72nd Ave NE
6370 Highway 65 NE
1250 72nd Ave NE
114-16 62nd Way NE
6500-10 2nd St NE
190 Island Park Dr Nfi
Owner
Adele & Roger Gorman
Adele & Roger Goiman
Adele & Roger Gomaan
G. John Lund
J. M. Levander/N. F. Owen
V Hoium/D Ottemess
Donald Koss
J & K Baumhofer
Carver Park Rentals
Carver Park Rentals
Douglas E. Flege
Danny & Perl Johnsen
Eugene � Thomas
N.H.C. Properties '
Alphonse & Regina Klisch
Kenneth R. Hafner
Darlene D. Hafner
Richard J. Smith
Bigos Pmperties
Bigos Properties
Bigos Properties
Bigos Propertaes
Bigos Properties
Bigos Pmperties
Bigos Properties
Bigos Properties
Bigos Progerties
Bigos Properties
Bigos Properties
Bigos PropeRies
John Momssey
Jeffrey Dilan
Robert & Katheleen Andres
Herman Rice
William E. Fogerty
Wayne A. Johnson
Roscoe & Harriet Smith
David L. Halek
Chad Vugteveen
Paul J. Slesar
Timothy & Nancy. Patterson
Riverwood Apartments
Building Management
Edric Associates
Arnold C. Elmquist
Stellar Inc.
Gary Knutson
Arnold Aspenson
Curtis Bostrom
(4)
17.06
LICENSES
Units
i
1
1
1
2
7
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
4
2
2
7
11
11
11
11
11
7
4
11
11
11
5
5
1
1
4
18
2
3
32
2
2
2
1
33
24
42
15
29
2
2
12
Fee
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
50.00
115.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
50.00
100.00
50.00
50.00
115.00
135.00
135.00
135.00
135.00
135.00
115.00
100.00
135.00
135.00
135.00
105.00
105.00
25.00
25.00
100.00
170.00
50.00
75.00
240.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
245.00
200.00
290.00
155.00
225.00
50.00
50.00
140.00
� _
�
Comm.unity Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: FebruarY 9, 1995 �
TO: William Burns, City Manager�
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Background
�
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Public ;Hearing to Modify Redevelopment Plan and to
Create 'Tax Increment Financing District #13
Consistent with the City Council and HRA direction at its joint
meeting on December 5, 1994, the necessary documentation has been
prepared to create a-new tax increment district in order to
acquire the four apartment buildings immediately adjacent to the
Southwest Quadrant property. Jim Casserly has prepared the
attached tax increment financing plan, entitled "Satellite Lane
Apartments". Later in the City Council agenda is the resolution
authorizing creation of the district.
Purpose of Hearinct
Prior to taking formal action on acquiring the apartment
properties, either thr�ough negotiation or condemnation, a tax
increment financing district must be created, and the existing
"Redevelopment Project, Area" which now exists on the ten acre
Southwest Quadrant sit.e, must be expanded. State law requires
the City Council condu.ct a public hearing and pass a resolution.
Neighborhood Meetincr
A neighborhood meeting� was conducted on February 2, 1995 at the
Fridley Covenant Churc:h. Homeowners as well as apartment tenants
were brought up-to-dat:e about the,City's plans for redevelopment
of the Southwest QuadY�ant. Relocation information was provided
to the tenants, and Rc�ttlund Homes presented its concept plan for
development of the sit:e.
No adverse comments we�re heard at the neighborhood meeting from
the homeowners about e:xpanding the project area to acquire the
apartments and expand the redevelopment area. In fact, a letter
of support has been rE;ceived and is included in this packet.
Public Hearing on TIF #13
February 9, 1995
Page 2
Some of the apartment tenants did express concern at being
relocated from their homes. Tenants at the neighborhood�meeting
were advised of the public hearing to be conducted at the City
Council meeting. Staff has also received a number of phone calls
from tenants regarding the project. We have made them aware that
the HRA has hired a relocation consultant and have referred many
calls to the consultant.
Purpose of Redevelopment Proj„_ect
The expanded project area and creation of the tax increment
district is very important for the redevelopment as now
conceived. The redevelopment project, as proposed by Rottlund
Homes, will accomplish the goals established in the Center City
plan in 1979, will provide a var�ety of housing styles to
encourage people to stay in Fridley, and will establish a
"quality" project with a sizable market value.
Other Related Actions
At its February 1, 1995, the Planning Commission passed a
resolution stating that creating the tax increment district is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The HRA at its February
9, 1995 will consider a resolution to also authorize creation of
the district subject to City Council approval on Monday evening.
Finally, the HRA will consider a resolution authorizing
condemnation proceedings on the apartments. The condemnation
action cannot be filed until the tax increment district has been
approved by the City Council.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct the public hearing
on creation of the tax increment district and expansion of the
Redevelopment Project Area. Scheduled later in the agenda is
consideration of the resolution to create the tax increment
financing district. If there are no significant objections,
staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution (separate
memo is enclosed in the agenda).
BD/dw
M-95-98
19.02 -
0
SOUTIHWEST QUADRAI�T
PRqPOSED TIF #13
. � /%4 CORNER� .
Q Q �'EC��4
4 � ^ • .7 t�_'
Q � i
O.v
J � , • � • ! ' • � N/
J Q �'
�I � G ��%% 3L
� � � i , � I J/
O� �O°�, � ��I �
J � �
'/ • � i� :y `
r �� � e
SYLVQN .; LANE
.k
�
� ,
-----� �!
' 2"rJ�J.P'....�.... . .
dv�
�
�'t�- �....� tLLI i t,--;�;, ._
js�. .� r5 / �• �• �
�j4 � � �(��' .. , --'•`1� .�.,�-
•��
' c: '�' �,r.� ,: = Itiol
�l ,t ;'� : � . _ '-3. _
. . ; " �' , �/ ,, -: `
,� ,:�`• _ _ �� '. ;' �; � �'
.\ �, �I�,
OP,=�,' -_ - _ ..
,. —_ i;�)- �� . ���f-?F`a�RY
19.03
O�
.
:
i�
. ?,- ' _'
�ti>> = ,:
`' J ,;•nir,a
�R:J
l� r,
. i.2 ai
o ��
. DRIVE � _ '
� .r.
� r„w
�s) �s� .�� ;.;r"x
nt- _ , _,� .
Notice is hereby given
Fridley City Council at
Avenue N.E. on Monday,
of:
PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE THE
CITY COUNCIL
that there will be a public hearing of the
the Fridley Municipal Center, 6431 University
February 13, 1995 at 7:30 p.m. for the purpose
Approval and adoption of a Modified Redevelopment
Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.074,
inclusive. The hearing is also relative to the
approval and adoption of Modified Tax Increment
Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing
Districts No. 1 through No. 12, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179,.
inclusive. The hearing is further relative to the
approval and adoption of a proposed Tax Increment
Financing Plan and the creation of proposed Tax -
Increment Financing District No. 13 pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179,
inclusive. Copies of the documentation relating to
the above proposed actions will be on file and
available for public inspection in the City Clerk's
office.
The property proposed to be included in the Tax
Increment Financing District is described below and
illustrated on the attached map:
TIF District No. 13
PIN 14-30-24-32-0052
PIN 14-30--24-32-0053
PIN 14-30-24-32-0057
PIN 14-30-24-32-0059
This property is generally located at 155, 195,
201, and 221 Satellite Lane N.E., and Third Street
adjacent to PIN 14-30-24-32-0053.
Hearing impaired persons planning to attend who need an interpreter or
other persons with disabilities who require auxiliary aids should
contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 no later than February 6, 1995.
Any and all persons desiring to be heard shall be given an opportunity
at the above stated time and place. Any questions related to this item
may be referred to the Fridley Community Development Department at 572-
3592.
Publish: January 31, 1995
February 7, 1995
19.04
WILLIAM J. NEE
MAYOR
6230 Jupiter RoaB`N.E.
Fridley, Mn. 55432
Barbara Dacy
Community Development Director
City of Fridley
Dear Ms Dacy,
On behalf of all my inlmediate neighbors I want to thank all of .
the Fridley officials for the fine and welcome meeting last
night on the southwest; quadrant redevelopment.
We appreciate all the years of effort and planning that must
have gone into thi s pi�o j ect .
W� have been in our home here in the Sylvan Hills area since 1957
along with many of thE� original home owners. Needless to say,
we have all been concE�rned with the deterioration of the Cherrywood
Apartments and the efi=ect on our home valuations.
You made our day:
Thanks for a great ef�Eort.
S' ce
�--s=-
.
it . Hart
`' 19.05
SECTION XIV
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 13
(SATELLITE LANE APARTMENTS)
Subsection 14.1. Statement of Obiectives. See Section I,
Subsection 1.5. Statement of Objectives.
Subsection 14.2. Modified Redevelopment Plan. See Section
I, Subsections 1.2. through 1.15.
Subsection 14.3. Parcels to be Included. The boundaries of
Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 are described on the
attached Exhibit XIV-A and illustrated on Exhibit XIV-B.
Subsection 14.4. Parcels in Acquisition. The Authority may
publicly acquire and reconvey any or all of the parcels in Tax
Increment Financing District No. 13 identified on the attached
Exhibit XIV-A.
The following are conditions under which properties not
designated to be acquired may be acquired at a future date:
(1) The City may acquire property by gift, dedication,
condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to
achieve the objectives of the Tax Increment Financing Plan;.and
(2) Such acquisition will be undertaken only when there is
assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related
COSt5.
Subsection 14.5. Development Activitv for which Contracts
have been Sianed. As of the date of adoption of the Tax
Increment Financing Plan, the City intends to enter into a
Development Agreement with The Rottlund Company, Inc. for the
construction of approximately 44 townhome unit5 with an estimated
tota� market value of $4,405,500.
Subsection 14.6. Specific Development Expected to Occur.
At this time it is anticipated that approximately 44 townhome
units will be constructed in 1996 and 1997.
Subsection 14.7. Prior Planned Improvements. The Authority
shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for
certification to the County Auditor or its notice of district
enlargement with a listing of all properties within Tax Increment
Financing District No. 13 for which building percnits have been
issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding
14 - 1
19.06
approval of the Tax Inrrement Financing Plan by the Authority.
The county Auditor sha:Ll increase the original tax capacity of
Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 by the tax capacity of
each improvement for wlzich the building permit was issued. If
said listing does not accompany the aforementioned request or
notice, the absence of such listing shall indicate to the County
Auditor that no building permits were issued in the eighteen (18)
months prior to the Aut:hority's approval of the Tax Increment
Financing Plan.
Subsection 14.8. Fiscal Disparities. The Authority hereby
elects the method of t��x increment computation set forth in
Minnesota Statutes, Sec,tion 469.177, Subdivision 3, clause (a) if
and when commercial/inciustrial development occurs with Tax
Increment Financing Di;�trict No. 13.
Subsection 14.9. Estimated Public Improvement Cos�s. The
estimated costs associ��ted with Redevelopment Project No. 1 are
listed in Section I, Subsections 1.9 and 1.10.
Subsection 14.10. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness.
It is anticipated that $4,098,000 of bonded indebtedness could be
incurred with respect t:o this portion of Redevelopment Project
No. l. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178,
Subdivision l, General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds may be used
as required to amortize: the costs identified in Section I,
Subsections 1.9 and 1.7_0. The City reserves the right to pay for
all or part of the activities listed in Section I, Subsections
1.9. and 1.10. relatinq to Redevelopment Project No. 1 as tax
increments are generatE:d and become available.
Subsection 14.11. Sources of Revenue. The costs outlined
in Section I, Subsectian 1.9. will be financed through the annual
collection of tax incre:ments.
Subsection 14.12. Estimated Original and Ca�tured Tax
Ca�acities. The tax capacity of all taxable property in Tax
Increment Financing Di�otrict No. 13, as most recently certified
by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota on
January 2, 1994, is est:imated to be $16,008.
The estimated capt:ured tax capacity of Tax Increment
Financing Dis�rict No. 13 upon completion of the proposed
improvements on Januar�� 2, 1998 is estimated to be $56,430.
Subsection 14.14. Tax Increment. Tax increment has been
calculated at approxima�tely $64,645 upon completion of the
improvements assuming a� static tax capacity rate and a valuation
increase of zero percernt (Oo) compounded annually.
Subsection 14.13. Tax Capacitv Rate. The current total tax
capacit� rate is 1�4.5�80.
1. ^•
19.07
Subsection 14.15. Type of Tax Increment Financinq District.
Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 is, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.174, a Redevelopment District.
Subsection 14.16. Duration of Tax Increment Financina
District. The duration of Tax Increment Financing District No.
13 is expected to be twenty-five (25) years from receipt of the
first tax increment. The date of receipt of the first tax
increment is estimated to be July, 1997. Thus, it is estimated
that Tax Increment Financing District No. 13, including any
modifications for subsequent phases or other changes, would
terminate in the year 2022.
Subsection 14.17. Estimated Impact on Other Taxina
Jurisdictions. The estimated impact on other taxing
jurisdic�ions assumes construction would have occurred without
the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 13. If the
construction is a result of tax increment financing, the impact
is $0 to other entities. Notwithstanding the fact that the
fiscal impact on the other taxing jurisdictions is $0 due to the
fact that the financing would not have occurred without the
assistance o� the City, the attached Exhibit XIV-E reflects the
estimated impact of Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 if
the "but for" test was not met.
Subsection 14.18. Modification of Tax Increment Financin4
District and or Tax Increment Financinct Plan. As of February 13,
1995, no modifications to Tax Increment Financing District No. 13
or the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore has been made, said
date being the date of initial approval and adoption thereof by
the City Council.
lr ,
19.08
EXHiBIT XIV-A
� PAR�CELS TO BE INCLUDED IN
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 13
SATELLITE LANE APARTMENTS -�
AS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED FEBRUARY 13, 1995
P.I.N.
14-30-24-32-0052
14-30-24-32-0053
14-30-24-32-0057
14-30-24-32-0059
and Third StreE:t adjacent to PIN 14-30-24-32-0053
XI" "-�.
19.09
EXHIBIT XIV-B
BOUNDARY MAP OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 13
�i
�
1
� :-
�
� L O l�Y'� L L A I�D.
. . 1�
v, �■ r•.rr..�
�. . . . � . _: � r'� � c,, "`. , ru Fl�i�� E� Y P�1 F�
t � — A�'t; —
� ' / , _ _ . . � , .: •. • . i �.�.�, (��.. ; ; '' , . � . . ' ' � r� �i
�G,�� . . ' ' • • : / (�- � ■ . , ' , '� ;
� '�. ,— ' t • � r ~ Ct� �' �• . • . . ' ' �• �
. . • 2 • F-,� � � ■ y _ ' : ! � . . ' e�"�
`�; � .. 'm /� - ■!.%� w�,,�� .. � ;~'J: • . � i Wr
� . . �''' .: �� .:� �,. a�� :�. ; '. ; - ; _ a �� i� i �'
. � . .,,rw+�:�a�+�+.� . . ; • ; •� i "'�
. .,. T * , . �' - ,c_, . . - ,,,,,� . .. : . rn
�. . �~• �S Y'I AN N/LL S f�L.4 T 6: ��: 1"'
.� . .. -���� �� ; � � r
(n •. oR ` � , j � ir �� � �
r� a _ �`� r r ' �.L . � .' _ �� _�.-.._.�. , � � �
��` � , i�� • • ' . "x : �i j f t1'1 : t
� • • ! • ,G \'• • I � � � !
' 1 '�.• �� • ` •'✓ ,•5, •4• ti:�� �� � ` , �i.
� • Z .r t �
--. :: � t � � � � �. '� :�"
--� � .'�. : .� . . �,.• �. . _ � �.� r � c�— .. �. -
. , ..:: . .f . ��:: ,�-' �:. �� � �, t" ' �ii
. .: ;_ � �� . .:, .=- ,. � .�� -�� .� � : � �
-:.: .- � ::: -.�.-�- :�,. : ; ��� _� ..., • �: �a"
. a . � � _ •r ' Ci Nt ' "t • ___„4' • ' • � •� � �
.. ' ' _ i�'7 :.�� �, � �' .��. � w�• ! �
. � t ' , ,�� ��� , �Y •• . � �
i '• . .._.. 1 �. . °' �� 1 2r � ti . : .�' .. i �
� � ',I � • ` �, '� 1 A '� .. �•. �
' . ~ � ` � �~ I�^'` ^ •r'° ` �`� . . . � + `s '' • `s'?' .
� �•. . �. � •. , . � ~ y: �. _zi tir. r � j' , � `: ��t �
•,' .. ','; !Tt , . , ` ti j rn � S• ''' ; ^ ; � � �
.., .._;~: ., .. � . t ,�, .
� � � `�f: •• •S�y: 7 �. \ 'l , • � :��, ' y' ti ' i;; , ;'a+' �•
,; � ; • : .; . ') _ _ � . , ;: -, � � , ,• � ,, �
:�r. , ` •:..t._ . ! <, � � � ., _ ._��. �.�..�-..� . � , ^, : n -- - '`r.r�
` � . � ' • • • .
� � . i �, i � �. � ' i � %•. : - : ' �� � � �
f ���1I � " °�''�' ��Y ����� .. . . .--- . . , . � .. . . .. ._ i --
: � � ; �� ; : �4; ;�� '
.., .. � ' , .. _ i
,� ', .:s i . ._ .. .r1 a' �':�• • - 'fr.• • • --• . ' .j"" -
�c � '" ' Z• . . .:i _,• ^ , : �� � � � �. ...t ... ' � -
. ` t� ' t� ;• '!� `'�. „ ' � ` \ � � ;• . . � � ' ,_ '� •
.'77 i. .� : • • • 1�~ ►� ± r+� �
�w '.,��. - ;a� � .. �;-� y �; .-i .' . . ,.�. •
' � •--e�� �i..... ... .. . �.�. �� �• '
XIV-B-1
19.�a
�
�
�
�
i�
�
�
�
�
rn
�
ir1
�
�
�
�
�
..�..
�
�
�`
W
ri'I
�
�
�
�
m
Ca
�
rn
r,a
�
�
�
�
'�
�
rn
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
PROPOSED SATELLITE LANE PROJECT
ORIGINAL ESTIMATED
TAX TAX
UATE CAPACITY CAPACITY
6 / 1995
12 / 1995
6 / 1996
12 / 1996
6 / 1997
12 / 1997
6 / 1998
12 / 1998
6 / 1999
12 / 1999
6 / 2000
12 / 2000
6 / 2001
12 / 2001
6 / 2002
12 / 2002
6 / 2003
12 / 2003
6 / 2004
12 / 2004
6 / 2005
12 / 2005
6 / 2006
12 / 2006
6 / 2007
12 / 2007
6 / 2008
12 / 2008
6 / 2009
72 / 2009
6 / 2010
12 / 2010
6 / 2011
12 / 2011
6 / 2012
12 / 2012
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16�008
16,008
16�008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16�008
16,008
16.008
16.008
16,008
16,008
16.008
16.008
i6,008
16,008
16,008
16.008
16.008
16,008
16.008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16,008
16.008
16.008
16,008
16,008
44.223
44,223
72.438
72.438
72.438
72.438
72,438
72.438
72.438
72.438
72.438
72.438
72.438
72,438
72,438
72.438
72.438
72.438
72.438
72,438
72.438
72,438
72,438
72.438
72.438
72,438
72.438
72.438
72.438
72,438
72,438
72�438
EXHIBIT XIV—C
CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
CITY OF FRIOLEY. MINNESOTA
44 UNITS
CAPTURED ESTIMATED
TAX TAX
CAPACITY INCREMENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
28,275
28,215
56,430
56.430
56.430
56,430
56,430
56,430
56�430
56.430
56,430
56�430
56,430
56,430
56,430
5b.430
56,430
56,430
56,430
56,430
56.430
56,430
56,430
56,430
56,430
56,430
56,430
56.430
56.430
56�430
Q
0
0
0
0
0
16.161
16.161
32.323
32,323
32.323
32,323
32,323
32,323
32.323
32. 323�
32 � 3231
32, 32�c
32. 32�t
32.323
32. 32:{
32.32:!
32.323
32,323
32. 32:3
32, 32:3
32, 32:3
32�323
32. 32:3
32,323
32.323
32,323
32.323
32.323
32,323
32.323
937� 3°�4
LESS: AVAILABLE
ADMIN TAX
FEES INCREMENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.616
1.616
3,232
3,232
3�232
3,232
3�232
3,232
3,232
3�232
3,232
3,232
3�232
3,232
3.232
3,232
3�232
3.232
3,232
3,232
3.232
3�232
3,232
3.232
3,232
3,232
3.232
3.232
3,232
3.232
93.735
0
0
0
0
0
0
14.545
14.545
29.090
29.090
29,090
29,090
29.090
29,090
29,090
29.090
29.090
29.090
29.090
29,090
29.090
29.090
29,090
29.090
29,090
29.090
29.090
29.090
29.090
29.090
29,090
29.090
29.090
29.090
29.090
29.090
843.618
------------------------------------------�____=°______________= ______
------------------------------------------
SAT1
7.50R W RATE
PRESENT YALUE ANALYSIS
SEMI ANNUAL CUh�1LATIVE
BALAWCE BAL.AWCE
0
0
0
0
0
0
11.662
71.241
21,669
20,886
20.131
19,403
18�702
i8,026
17.375
1b.747
16.141
7 5. 558
14.996
14.454
13.931
13.428
12.942
12.474
12.024
11,589
11.170
10�766
10.377
1Q,002
9,641
9.292
8.956
8.633
8.32]
8,020
408.557
0
0
0
0
0
0
11.662
22.903
44,573
65,459
85,590
104.993
123,695
141.721
159,096
175,842
191�984
207.542
222.537
236.991
250.922
264�349
277,292
289.766
301�790
313,379
324.549
335.315
345.692
355. 695
365.335
374.627
383,584
392.216
400.537
408.557
408.557
PREPA'RED BY CASSERi Y i��Ol::.�1 & ASSOCIATES, INC.
XI ,19.,1.1
PAGE 1
11—Jan-95
ORIGINAL MARKET VALUE
ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY
PAY 1994 TAX RATE
AOMIN FEES
INFLATION
PV RATE
HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES
ESTIMATED SALES PRICE
ESTIMATED SALES PRICE/UNIT
ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE
ESTIMATEO MARKET VALUE/UNIT
ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY
ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY/UNIT
ESTIMATED TAXES
ESTIMATED TAXES/UNIT
CONSTRUCTION
VALUATION
TAXES PAYABLE
CONSTRUCTION
VALUATION
TAXES PAYABLE
CITY Of FRIQLEY� MINNESOTA
6/1995
33 UNITS 100�000
11 UNITS 145,000
90.00X
33 UNITS 90,000
11 UNITS 130�500
1.00R 2.00X 1,080
1.00X 2.00S 1,890
33 UNITS 1�237
11 UNITS 2�165
SO.00X 1996
1997 28.215
1998
50.00X 1997
1998 28.215
1999
19.12
SAT1 PREPARED BY CASSERLY �•i�;;.[r!%i�i & ASSOCIATES, INC.
X� L�--c: -2
7.600.800
16.008
1.145580
lO.DOZ
O.00X
7. 50x
4.895.000
4,405,500
56.430
64�645
PAGE 2
11—Jan-95
EXHIBIT XIV-D
"BUT FOR" ANALYSIS
The four parcels in the proposed Tax Increment Financing District
are located in an area which has been targeted by the City for
redevelopment. For the past fifteen years the City has attempted
to redevelop the southwest quadrant of University Avenue and
Mississippi Street. In pursuit of this overall redevelopment,
the City has already acquired a number of adjoining parcels which
are blighted. These remaining four parcels are an integral part
of the total redevelopment of this area. The City intends to
demolish the four substandard apartment buildings and replace
them with an approximate 44-unit market rate housing project. In
addition to providing improved housing opportunities, this
redevelopment will provide an additional $2,804,700 in market
value to the City's tax base.
Due to the high costs of land acquisition, demolition,
relocation, site improvements and the installation of public
improvements, this redevelopment project can not proceed without
public assistance from the City.
XT�7 -D-1
19.13
EXHIBIT XIV—E
ESTIMATED IMPACT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 13
IMPACT ON TAX BASE
ORIGINAL ESTIMATED CAPTURED DISTRICT
TAX TAX TAX TAX AS %
ENTITY BASE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY OF TOTAL
City of Fridley 27,329,921 16,008 72,438 56,430 0.206%
County of Anoka 146,471,588 16,008 72,438 56,430 0.039%
ISD #14 11,514,810 16,008 72,438 56,430 0.490%
IMPACT ON TAX RATE
TAX % OF TAX TAX RATE
ENTITY RATE TOTAL INCREMENT INCREASE
City of Fridley 0.16026 13.99% 9,043 0.033%
County of Anoka 0.60840 53.11 % 34,332 0.023%
ISD #14 0.32680 28.53% �8,441 0,161°/a
Other 0.05012 4.38% 2,828
1.14558 100.00% 64,645
* Assumes construction would have occurred without the creation of a Tax Increment Financing District.
If constrtuction is a result of Tax Increment Financing, the impact is $0.
19.y4
xii; � 1
AS MODIFIED FEBRUARY 13, 1995
Land Acquisition
Relocation
Demolition
Public Improvements
Site Improvements
Issuance Costs
Contingency
Administrative Expenses
Total
Maximum Estimated Bonded Indebtedness *
$2,500,000
300,000
200,000
25,000
25,000
20,000
250,000
95,000
$3,415,000
$4,098,000
* This amount includes capitalized interest in an amount sufficient
to pay interest on the bonds from the date of issue until the date
of collection of sufficient tax increment revenues to meet
scheduled interest payments when due.
1 - 20
19.15
F
�
�
c
F
�
c
�
�
c
e
�
UNIVERSlTYAVEI�IUF
�
•
�
�
��°
��
� �
a�
•
-
Z
0
�
� c9
<" z�
��Z y
o��-`. =z
4 �
c.-�'iO7d' J�
2zV a�
��Z �d
V -ri °- (� Q
_�� li
�Z
� F
L �
M �y,�
^ C � � �
�k�ni
'.c:_<
Z � p =
U- :J-
CSZ�
•N'=-
q-:`o
v`�:".
�:-cz-
��'az�
Z� .` ...
.� r- ? :�
� � '=
V Z ' '=
Zv� z^
Z � Z
Q = _
Z C � z
�C '
- t _
CCi.-yL-
LZ�r�•'
�
= 'L �
r ? �
s =
, z ^ -
_'yZ-
_ �-.
� _
�
I
Community Development Department
PLANiVING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 9, 1995 �
TO: William Burns, City Manager�
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Resolution Modifying the Redevelopment Plan and
Establishing Tax Increment Financing District #13
Pending the outcome of the public hea�ing earlier in the agenda,
staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution
creating Tax Increment Financing District #13 and expanding the
Redevelopment Project Area.
BD/dw
M-95-99
20.a 1.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION MODIFYING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND TO REFLECT
INCREASED PROJECT COSTS AND INCREASED
GEOGRAPHIC AREA WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
NO. 1, MODIFYING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
NO. 1 THROUGH NO. 12 TO REFLECT INCREASED
PROJECT COSTS AI�TD INCREASED GEOGR.APHIC AREA
WITHIN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. l, AND
CREATING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.
13 AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
RELATING THERETO.
BE iT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of
Fridley, Minnesota (the °City"), as follows:
Section l. Recitals.
1.01. It has been proposed and approved by the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") that the Council modify
the Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 to
reflect increased project costs and increased geographic area,
pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from
time to time.
1.02. It has been further proposed and approved by the Authority
that the Council modify the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans
for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 12 to
reflect increased project costs and increased geographic area
within Redevelopment Project No. 1, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended and
supplemented from time to time.
1.03. It has been further proposed and approved by the Authority
that the Council approve the establishment of proposed Tax
Increment Financing District No. 13 and approve and adopt the
proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto pursuant to
and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to
469.179, inclusive, as amended and supplemented from time tv time.
1.04. The Authority has caused to be prepared, and this Council
has investigated the facts with respect thereto, a Modified
Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 to reflect
increased project costs and increased geographic area; Modified Tax
Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No.
1 through No. 12 to reflect increased project costs and increased
geographic area within Redevelopment Project No. 1; and a proposed
Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing
District No. 13, defining more precisely the property to be
included, the public costs to be incurred and other matters
relating thereto.
2�.�2
Page 2 - Resolution No.
1.05. The Authority and the Council have performed all actions
required by law to be performed prior to the approval and adoption
of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. l,
of the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment
Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 12, and of the proposed Tax
Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing
District No. 13.
1.06. The Council hereby determines that it is necessary and in
the best interests of the City and the Authority at this time to
approve and adopt the Modified Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment
Project No. 1 to reflect increased project costs and increased
geographic area; to approve and adopt the Modified Tax Increment
Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through
No. 12 to reflect increased project costs and increased geographic
area within Redevelopment Project No. l; and to approve and adopt
the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax
Increment Financing District No. 12.
Section 2. Findinqs.
2.01. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
assistance to be provided through the adoption and implementation
of the Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment
Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan are
necessary to assure the development and redevelopment of
Redevelopment Project No. 1.
2.02. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
Modified Redevelopment Plan, Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans
and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan conform to the general
plan for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole
in that they are consistent with the City's comprehensive plan.
2.03. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
Modified Redevelopment Plan; Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans
and proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan afford maximum
opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole
for the development and redevelopment of Redevelopment Project No.
1 by private enterprise and it is contemplated that the development
and redevelopment thereof will be carried out pursuant to
redevelopment contracts with private developers.
2.04. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. l; of the Modified Tax Increment
Financing Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through
No. 12; and of the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for
proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 by the City is
intended and, in the judgement of this Council,�its effect will be
to promote the purposes and objectives specified in this Section 2
20.03
Page 3 - Resolution No.
and otherwise promote certain public purposes and accomplish
certain objectives as specified in the Modified Redevelopment Plan,
Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and proposed Tax Increment
Financing Plan.
2.05. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that
proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 constitutes a"tax
increment financing district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, Subdivision 9, and further constitutes a type of
"redevelopment district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.174, Subdivision 10.
2.06. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
proposed development or redevelopment in proposed Tax Increment
Financing District No. 13, in the opinion of the Council, would not
occur solely through private investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future and, therefore, the use of tax increment
financing is deemed necessary.
2.07. The Council hereby finds, determines and declares that the
City made the above findings stated in this Section 2 and has set
forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in
the Modified Redevelopment Plan, the Modified Tax Increment
Financing P1ans, the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan and
Exhibit A of this Resolution.
Section 3. Modification of the Modified Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1.
3.01. The modifications to the Modified Redevelopment Plan for
Redevelopment Project No. 1 reflecting increased project costs and
increased geographic area are hereby approved and adopted by the
Council of the City of Fridley.
Section 4. Modification of the Modified Tax Tncrement Financina
Plans for Tax Increment Financinq Districts No. 1 through No. 12.
4.01. The modifications to the Modified Tax Increment Financing
Plans for Tax Increment Financing Districts No. 1 through No. 12
reflecting increased project costs and increased geographic area
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 are hereby approved and adopted
by the Council of the City of Fridley.
Section 5. Approval of the Tax Increment Financinq Plan and
Establishment of Proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 13.
5.01. The establishment of proposed Tax Increment Financing
District No. 13 within Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the proposed
Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto are hereby approved
and adopted by the Council of the City of Fridley.
20.04
Page 4 - Resolution No.
Section 6. Filing of Plans.
6.01. Upon approval and adoption of the Modified Redevelopment
Plan, the Modified Tax Increment Financing Plans and the proposed
Tax Increment Financing Plan (collectively the "Plans�'), the City
shall cause said Plans to be filed with the Commissioner of
Revenue.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY THIS DAY OF
, 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
20.05
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO.
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the proposed Tax
Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment Financing
District No. 13 as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.175, Subdivision 3, are as follows:
1. Finding that proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 13
is a"redevelopment district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174. Subdivision 10.
Proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 consists of four
parcels of land, each of which contain a substandard apartment
building, and which qualify as a redevelopment district under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10.
2. Finding that the proposed development or redevelopment, in the
opinion of the Council, would not occur solely through private
investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore
the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
City staff have reviewed the current estima�ed costs for
redeveloping this area which has been targeted for redevelopment by
the City for the past f ifteen years . They have determined that due
to the high costs of acquisition, demolition, relocation, site
improvements and installation of public improvements, this
redevelopment project would not proceed without the City's
assistance.
3. Finding that tihe proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan
conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment
of the municipality as a whole.
The Planning Commission of the City of Fridley has reviewed the
proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for proposed Tax Increment
Financing District No. 13 and has determined that the proposed Tax
Increment Financing Plan conforms to the comprehensive plan of the
City.
4. Finding that the proposed Tax Increment Financing Plan for
proposed Tax Increment Financing District No. 13 will afford
maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as
a whole for the development or redevelopment of Redevelopment
Project No. 1 by private enterprise.
The proj ect to be developed will be located within proposed Tax
Increment Financing District No. 13 and will consist of the
demolition and removal of four substandard apartment buildings and
the construction of 44 market rate housing units. In addition to
the elimination of a blighting influence, the housing project will
provide additional housing opportuni�ies, increase the tax base and
provide additional construction opportunities.
2�.06
r �
�
I
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: February 9, 1995 �
TO: William Burns, City Manager �'�
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: Variance Request, VAR #95-01, by Equity D.evelopers
Inc.; 970 Osborne Road N.E.
The Appeals Commission at its January 31, 1995 meeting reviewed
the variance request to reduce the required minimum lot area in
an M-1, Light Industrial district from 32;670 to 23,000 square
feet. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the request to the City Council with one stipulation:
1. If necessary, the variance request for setback reduction
shall be processed at the time of building permit
application.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council concur with the Appeals
Commission action.
MM/dw
M-95-95
21.0�
r �
�
�
S TAFF REP 0 RT
Community Development Department
APPLICP,TION NUMBER:
♦ VAR #95-01
PETITIONER:
Appeals Coinmission Date January 31, 1995
Planning Cocnmission Date
City Council Date February 13, 1995
♦ Equity Developers, Inc.
♦ RMS Company, Owner
LOCATION:
♦ 970 Osborne Road N.E.; zoned M-1, Light Industrial.
Currently, there is a 24 foot x 36 foot, two car garage
located on the subject parcel. The garage is a remnant from
a single family dwelling which was once located on the
subject parcel.
REQUEST:
♦ To reduce the required minimum lot area from 32,670 square
feet to 23,000 square feet.
PUBLIC PURPOSE:
♦ Section 205.17.03.A requires a minimum lot area of not less
than three quarters of an acre for one main building on
plats recorded prior to January 1, 1983.
Public purpose served by this requirement is to ensure
adequate lot area for principal uses, required parking
spaces and free area, and to avoid overcrowding of buildings
in industrial areas.
ANALYSIS:
♦ The petitioners are interested in purchasing the property
and constructing a multi-tenant building on the property
within the next one to three years. One of the petitioners
owns and operates a building property maintenance company.
Staff Report
January 26, 1995
Page 2
The petitioners submitted, with their application, a sketch
plan of a potential building on the property. As submitted,
the proposed building would require rear and side yard
setback variances for the building. The property was platted
in 1959.
The subject parcel is "sandwiched" between two existing
facilities. Fridley Tire & Brake is located to the east and
a manufacturing building is located to the west. Located to
the south of �he subject parcel is the storage area of the
former Lampert Lumber facility, now Division 7 Corporation.
The parcel is comprised of three parcels: A, B and C.
Parcel C is a gap in the legal description between Parcels A
and B. As a result of a combination of these remnant
parcels, the subject parcel is of a unique configuration in
addition to being less than the minimum required lot area.
If the City were to deny the lot area variance, a new use
could not be constructed on the parcel. The property owner.
could, however, utilize the subject parcel by selling
Parcels A and B to the adjacent properties to be used for
additional parking or open space.
The variance as requested is within previously granted
requests (14,320 square feet).
RECOMtrlENDATION/STIPULATIONS:
As the variance is within previously granted requests,staff
has no recommendation regarding the request. If the Appeals
Commission chooses to recommend approval of the request to
the City Council, staff recommends the following
stipulations:
1. If necessary, a variance request for setback reductions
shall be processed at the time of building permit
application.
APPEALS CON�Il�IISSION ACTION:
The Appeals Commission voted unanimously to recommend
approval of the request to the City Council as recommended
by staff.
CITY COUNCIL RECONI��NDATION:
Staff r�commends that the City Council concur with the
Appeals Commission action.
21.03
I
N �u
s c.
I �
� • O :1
■ ��i�
VAR 4� 95-0 1
Equity Developers, Inc.
SPRING LAKE PARK �
NPERT'S
DI T/ON � 2 � ,•'• ,�
AcQ�1�A1C QI'1 .,,... ",S'
�')
N�t fL✓/�,pti.
rn v �e..v r � �u
� iN.4.
;1
.b'
V"""
r� � r�o;
23 24 (
i
�!
N�
� 21.04 L�CATION MAP
�
4.�,
December 28, 1994
Ms. Michele McPherson, B.L.A.
Planning Assistant
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Re: Request for Variance - 970 Osbome Road
Dear Ms. McPherson:
Per our previous discussions on this matter, we enclose herewith our Variance Application and accompanying
materials for consideration by the City of Fridley.
Kindly note that we have identified two areas where we are seeking a variance from City code, regarding lot size
requirement and rear yard setback. As you may be aware, the subject property consists of approximately 23,000
square feet, which would prohibit constructing a main building per City «�de 205.17.03A. It is our intent within
the ne�ct 1-2 years to constnict one main facility on this property which will conform with all applicable City codes
and requirements; we foresee this facility to be of an office/warehouse type with l6' height and the possibility of a
retail storefront as permitted under the M-1 zoning. Based on the enclosed plan, you will also note that at the
southwestem portion of the parcel, we would plan to extend the parking surface and potentially a loading dock
within 5 feet of the angled side/rear yard, which as a matter of pure code interpretatioq would also require a
variance.
Our backgrounds in real estate include over 20 years ofearperience in developing, constructinS and
leasing/managing various types of commercial property. We believe that this property is located well and a new
facility will attract additional employment opportunities and consumer spending in the Fridley community.
We would be interested in the possibility of City-assisted t� increment financing or other development incentives
and look forward to meeting with the planning commission to further oudine our objectives.
Sincerely,
ilh tter, Principal
Equity eve pers, Inc.
340-5795
WPI{/emb
Enclosures
Larry Schatz, Principal
Building and Property Services
786-4226
21.05
• w �
• • .
��� : � z
R_ � .� �
.
• • � s
��t S
�l � e
• • 9 �
-�--� � : �
�z I
�,��. ; J . ..
: � . R-1
- aa
? � S� -
�i
� � ; !
� � 75 Tf
_1 1, 7 �
, - ; � - —�
W� r
r ,. . � _ ��.1
– ~ �; i . �
S
iQ � � ' V
;j ' ` �
�� ,}' ' o
.�
�,�o� '� -
. i;.
�' � r .3
Z4, '� °�Ax
� ---
w000cREST �
SCHOOI �
� 4 � 1 f: �/..,L
--�//
76TH. AVE.
; s �. � ��°o
�o<
;_ ' �'I:W•�
- �t. �e�
,I 3 � ��
c°o�
.. E ' .¢ � ;,�p�
:J �•1. iii�
•�•t�V;
d :' .�i
� 'c`
i/ AV E. N. E. :..' ^�co
,; o ��
- � .�� o�
19 �
1 P j c�
I � � o°o°t
T �•/z,•i o 0
Z � � S : : :� oaoo<
� • � �
LS j �'
1 � . P `OOO°cS
:�: .I
13 f • -
1Z � y .IP.; �^o^�
U.
z. �.o , /
z: i � • �
'� � W
.! /I �.�'�{Y
a
.E :� �m
• �n-��
- , .s �.t1.
.i � ,S (�lz�l . .
-.- 4.
�--��--�-�-- f _ t �
� �" �" � s l ^' {'�-. �"�
� � �`}��� �,�,�^ � � O
:.�, �. �-�,, ��� �
e '~1� � � r� � C ' ��
r��.. � � �� �
. �
� �- ..-
• :e- -�•�
��,��� `w1� �/�,�,�,/,�,1,�,�`1,� �
�
�.i �'NI// , �I����,i,i/i�i�iliL.��j��'—I
-4
92
� /�
�
� M-2
�
�
Z
Q
�T
♦iR
=
Z
4U
-
���
I
�o
. • .-.-�- a - - � •
�� � '
� ...T . ..
-�._. s�-
• . • • • �
h. �
y ,. .� aQp�.. .�
� . ....,..�:N
2 � •• �_,� g __�
� . o
% .. _
M��_SO7A DISTRICT LEGEND
\
�
�
..�C�h �.
�:� �-�11-/ OME FAYILY OWG'8 ❑ Y-1 . LIOHT INOUfT11UL �
-� Ih! TWO F�YILY DWO'8 � M-2 HE11V1/ �NOUfTq)At �
� 11-7 OEN. yULT1�lE OWO'S � PUD FLANNEO UNIT OEV. �
11-{ YO�ILE XOYE PAIIK � E-1 MYD! PAIIK NEIpMlORNO00 ❑
► PU6UC FACtUT1E5 � �8-2 ; REOFVEIOVMENT DItTRICT � ^\
CN LOC11l tYfINfEB - � O-1 CRFEK i RIYEII VqEfE�V11T10N �
C-2 OENEqAL lUi1NESi � O-t CqITICAI ARE11 0
C-i 6[MEqAL 5N0►PINO � -
GIII GENE11111 OFFICE � VACATEO fT11EETE i!
. _ .... . . .. ._._. ....._. . .
�.os ZONING MAP`
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JANIIARY 31, 1995
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Savage called the January 31, 1995, Appeals
Commission meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Others Present:
Diane Savage, Ken Vos, Cathy Smith, Carol
Beaulieu
Larry Kuechle
Michele McPherson, Planning Assistant
Bill Katter, Equity Developers
Larry Schatz, Equity Developers and
Building & Property
Dave Meyer, RMS Company
David Erickson, Erickson Oil Products, Inc.
Steven Hardel, Fridley Tire & Brake
APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 22 1994. APPEALS_COMMISSION MINUTES:
MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Dr. Vos, to approve the
November 22, 1994, Appeals Commission minutes as written.
OPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECI�ARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
1. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REOIIEST. #95-01.
BY EQUITY DEVELOPERS, INC:
Pursuant to Section 205.17.03.A of the Fridley City Code, to
reduce the required lot area from 32,670 square feet to
23,000 square feet on that part of the Northwest Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 30, Range 24,
Anoka County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing
on the North line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section
12, at a point 34 rods east of the Northwest corner of said
Section 12, Township 30, Range 24, thence East on the
section line 10 rods; thence South and parallel with West
line of said Section 16 rods; thence West parallel to the
North line 10 rods; thence North to the point of
Commencement; excepting therefrom, However, the East 104
feet of the foregoing described parcel and subject to a
public roadway over the North 33 feet thereof, AND Outlot 1,
of Nagel's Woodlands, AND All the land, if any, lying East
of Outlot 1 hereinabove noted as Parcel B, and West of the
parcel of land hereinabove noted as Parcel A and lying
between the Westerly extension of the North and South lines
21.07
�
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 31, 1995 PAGE 2
of that land hereinabove noted as Parcel A, generally
located at 970 Osborne Road N.E.
MOTION by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BAPAG$ DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 7:32 P.M.
Ms. McPherson stated the property is located at 970 Osborne Road
which is west of Highway 65 and south of Osborne Road. The VFW
is located to the east, the old RMS facility is located to the
west, and Division 7 Corporation, formerly Lampert Lumber, is
located to the south of the subject parcel. The property is
zoned M-1, Light Industrial.
Ms. McPherson stated the request is to reduce the required
minimum lot area from 32,670 square feet to 23,000 square feet.
At this time, the petitioners are interested in purchasing the
property to construct a multi-tenant building in the next three
to five years. Currently located on the property is a two-car
garage which remains after a single family dwelling was removed
from the site. The current.owner, RMS, used the structure for
storage of maintenance materials. The petitioners intend to
utilize the existing building for storage of maintenance
equipment. One of the petitioners owns a property maintenance
company. They also intend to utilize part.of the-site as it
exists for outdoor storage, which would be properly screened.
Ms. McPherson stated the property was platted in its current
configuration in 1959 and is comprised of three parcels -"A",
"B", and "C". "C" is a gap in the legal description between "A"
and "B". The petitioner is requesting a variance to the minimum
lot area to purchase the property and construct a building at a
future time. If the City were to deny the variance, a new
structure could not be constructed on the subject parcel. The
property owner would be left with the option of selling parcels A
and B to adjoining property owners to use them for additional
parking and/or open space.
Ms. McPherson stated the request is within previously granted
variance requests. Staff has no recommendation regarding the
request. If the Commission chooses to recommend approval, staff
recommends the following stipulation:
l. If necessary, a variance request for setback reductions
shall be processed at the time of building permit
application.
21.08
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 31 1995 PAGE 3
Ms. McPherson stated that included in the file is a preliminary
sketch plan showing a proposed building configuration which would
require variances. At this time, as the petitioners' plans are
not firm, staff felt it would be better to deal with those at a
future date.
Ms. Savage asked if the petitioners' intent was to use the
building currently on the site.
Ms. McPherson stated the petitioners would use the existing
building for storage of vehicles and equipment related to the
property maintenance company that one of the petitioners owns.
They plan to construct in the next three to five years a typical
multi-tenant industrial-type building.
Ms. Beaulieu asked if the Commission had previously granted a
variance reduction to 14,320 sguare feet.
Ms. McPherson stated yes.
Ms. Savage stated the purpose served is to avoid overcrowding of
buildings in industrial areas. How would granting the variance
affect the overcrowding of buildings?
Ms. McPherson stated located along the common property line ta
the east is the access driveway for the VFW so there is
approximately 25 feet to 30 feet between the VFW structure and
the property line.
Mr. Hardel stated his business, Fridley Tire & Brake, is located
between the VFW and the property being discussed.
Ms. McPherson stated there is open storage area to the south and
parking between the structure to the west and the subject parcel.
M�. Beaulieu stated any building they construct would need to fit
on the property unless the City grants further variances for
setbacks and asked if the petitioners are aware of that.
Ms. McPherson stated yes.
Ms. Smith stated, while the petitioner is applying now, will this
variance be good for one year.
Ms. McPherson stated a lot area variance such as this would run
with the property. A setback variance would be good for one
year. The petitioner would have to construct within that year;
otherwise, they would need to re-apply for those variances.
Mr. Katter stated they were looking at�constructing a building in
one to three years�rather than three to five years. Although the
lot is small, the present use is quite unattractive. They plan a
21.09
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JANUARY 31, 1995 PAGE 4
major improvement on that site. It is very likely they would
seek additional variances for setbacks because the lot is so
small. �
Ms. Savage asked the petitioner how they would improve the site.
Mr. Katter stated the building they are considering would
accoYnmodate his partner's business with office and warehouse
space with a retail storefront that is attractive toward the
street. There would be a permanent structure where there is now
a garage.
Mr. Hardel stated he owns the business directly to the east of
this property. The VFW is located to the east of his business.
He is attending the meeting to get further information on what is
being planned for the site. His main concern is the drainage on
this site. This property sits lower than the surrounding
properties and receives drainage from Osborne and the surrounding
properties.
Ms. McPherson stated staff would address that as part of the
building permit process. At that time, there would be another
public hearing for any setback variance requests for which the
petitioners may apply. At the time they apply for a building
permit, staff would require full scale grading and drainage
plans. ;
MOTION by�Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to close the
public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CBAIRPERSON SAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:43 P.M.
Dr. Vos stated it seems as if the petitioner knows that, when
they ask for a variance down to 23,000 square feet and then come
in for the building, they will have to face the issue of the
setbacks. He thought it was a reasonable request. He is not
sure what would happen when they get.to the setbacks. That may
be a different issue. If we do not grant the variance, it makes
the lot unbuildable in an M-1 district.
Ms. Beaulieu agreed. The hardship is what else can be done with
the property. The owners know that giving a variance for the
smaller lots does not automatically grant any future variances.
She would be in favor of approving.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Smith, to recommend to the
City Council approval of�Variance Request, VAR #95-01, by Equity
Developers, Inc., to reduce the xequired lot area from 32,670
square feet to 23,000 square feet on that part of the Northwest
Quarter of the Northwest Quarter o� Sectian 12, Township 30�
21.10
��
U
i
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
Community Development Department
PLANI�TING DTVISION
City of Friclley
January 27, 1995 �
William W. Burns, City Manager �
CObII�IUNITY WATER SIIPPLY EMERGSNCY AND CONSERVATION (CWSEC)
PLAN COMMITTBE
Lisa Campbell, Planning Associate
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
John Flora, Public Works Director
R sie Grie Police Special Projects Coordinator
o p,
Scott Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Howard Koolich, Assistant Finance Director
Chuck McKusick, Chief, Fire Department
Michele McPherson Planning Assistant
Jim Saefke, Director, Water Treatment Facilities
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPR09AL OF A PROPOSAL BY SHORT ELI,IOTT
HENDRICRSON (SEH) TO ASSIST.IN.THB PREPARATION.OF TH8
FRIDLEY COMMUNITY WATSR SIIPPLY AND CONSERPATION PLAN
�M;•�� •
our Community Water Supply and Conservation Committee held a
meeting on January 27, 1995 to discuss a recent proposal by Short
Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) to assist in the completion of the
Fridley CWSEC Plan. The focus of the meeting was to determine
whether the committee would be interested in pursuing a service
contract agreement with SEH.
--0''-
As you may recall, the Department of Natural Resources has required
that all communities with municipal water supplies submit water
conservation plans (as an amendment to their local comprehensive
plans) by January 1, 1996. SEH expressed an interest in assisting
our committee in the preparation of our plan. As a result SEH
prepared a proposal to complete a draft of our plan within 30 days
of contract signing. A final draft of the plan would be included
in the proposal price and would be submitted within one week of
formal adoption.
COST
The amount of the contract is $5,250.00; with 90� to be paid at the
point of completion of the draft plan; and 10� to be paid at the
CWSEC Plan
January 27, 1995
PAGE 2
point of completion of the final plan. The committee supported the
dollar amount, but believed the payment would better be divided at;
60� to be paid at the point of completion of the draft plan; and
40% at the completion of the final plan.
�_ •
-- Reduced staff costs in plan preparation. Cost to
complete this document should be measured both in dollars
and opportunity cost. Though coordination with our staff
will be essential, the bulk of the time consuming,
coordinating tasks can be handled by SEH. Staff projects
that as much as one hundred hours of staff coordination
time may be saved through this contract arrangement. If
done in house, this project would compete with Council
priority projects including the southwest quadrant
planning process, liquor store relocation, Hyde Park
Focus Groups and follow-up activities which may arise
from the focus groups.
-- E�ert Project Team. Short Elliott Hendrickson has
assembled a team of former municipal professionals to
deliver this service to communities.
Ann Perry is a highly qualified and respected urban
planner (formerly with the City of Minnetonka) with
expertise in the development of comprehensive plans,
environmental planning and city-oriented planning
activities and strategies.
Mr. Cantpbell is a senior project manager with over 20
years experience in the planning, design and construction
of municipal water systems throughout Minnesota.
Lloyd Pauly is a recognized public works manager
(formerly with the City of Minnetonka) who has over 30
years experience operating and managing a successful
municipal water system. He also has experience as an
emergency manager. Mr. Pauly is certified in emergency
management by both the State Department of Emergency
Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
-- Staff can keep a critical 3rd person perspective. Staff
will serve as technical support while keeping enough
distance (from the document as it is compiled) to have a
critical eye on the elements of the document.
22.02
CWSEC Plan
January 27, 1995
PAGE 3
Y.� ��'
After approval by the Council, SEH projects it will complete the
draft of the plan in thirty days. The EQE and Planning Commission
will evaluate the plan in April. It is hoped that the City Council
and Met Council approval will occur by the end of September.
1.� � Y�V.^ ��� i � �
The Committee recommends sigriing the proposed contract for services
for a value not to exceed $ 5,250.00, with one modification. The
committee has recommended that the payment schedule be modified
from 90� draft/10� final to 60� draft/40� final.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call Scott
Hickok at 572-3599.
SH/
M-95-65
22.03
s
.�
-
January 3, 1995
Mr. John Flora
Director of Public Works
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley MN 55432-4383
Dear Mr. Flora:
59D9 BAKER ROAD, SU/TE590. M/NNETONKA. MN 55345 612931-9501 FAX 612 931-1 188
ARCHITECTURE • ENC�i�NFERING • ENVIRONMEMAL • TRANSPIORTATION
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to assist the City of Fridley in preparing your Public Water
Supply, Emergency and Conservation Plan. Our proposal is organized into the following sections:
Scope of Services
Project Team
Responsibility of the City
Fee for Service
Timetable
Scope of Services
SEH representatives have met with the Department of Natural Resources, Metropolitan Council and staff inembers
and are prepared to develop a Water Supply, Emergency and Conservation Plan in cooperation with the City of
Fridley which will comply in all respects to the requirements of the Department of Natural Resources and the
Metropolitan Council and carry that plan through to approval.
We anticipate accomplishing. that by responding in detail in accordance with the following outline:
Water Suppty Plan — Master Outtine
A. Introduction
1. Discussion of the purpose of the plan. Importance of plan to meeting needs of the community;
compliance with state law, DNR rules, and Metropolitan Council requirements.
2. General discussion of community setting, population, status of development, and relationship in
regional setting.
3.
4.
SHORT ELLlOTf
HENDRlCKSON INC.
General description of the historical development of the public water system of the community.
Description of the water supply plan that follows.
ST PAUL, MN ST. CLOUa, MN (�-pppEt�yq F,q�LS W� iyqp�SpN yy�
22.04
B. Geologic Setting of the Comrnunity
1. General description of the underlying geology of the region
2. General description of the aquifers and gcoundwater conditions underlying the community.
3. General description of surface water characteristics of major bodies of water.
,
4. General description of water quality characteristics of subsurface and surface water amas.
C. Existing Water Supply, Storage and Treatment System
1. Description of specific aquifer and groundwater areas serving comrnunity wells.
2. Description of well construction specifications and locations.
3. Characteristics of ownership and use of public wetl sites.
4. Description of trunk water system and service areas.
S. Description of water supply system in relation to adjacent communities.
6. Description of water treatment facilities and characteristics.
D. Discussion of Historical Water Use and Suppiy: 1984-1995
1. Demographic changes and development characterisdcs.
2. Spec�c characteristics of user groups (i.e. residential, commencial, etc.).
3. Description of major water users in the community.
4. Collection of annual and seasonal well water levels.
5. Description of current issues with existing system and storage.
6. Presentation of statistics required for ptan:
• Population growth/water use.
• Per capita water use.
• Water demand by customer category.
• Seasonat and peak water demand use.
• Storage capabilities.
E. Discussion of Future Water Demand and Supply Needs
l. Identify and project water supply needs by user groups to the year 2005.
2. Determine capacity of existing system, storage, treatment, and wells to meet future needs.
3. Description of planned or needed improvements to meet future demand.
22,05
F. Estabtish Water Supply Policies, Objectives and Standards for Utility Operations
1. Establish community goals for water consumption and demand, water conservation, system
expansion, wellhead protection, and emergency situations.
2. Develop objectives that guide expansions to the system, focus water conservation efforts, and
encourage protection of subsurface and surface water supplies.
3. Formulate standards that will implement standards for utility operations.
G. Establish Water Conservation Plan
1. Genecally describe the need and purpose of water conservation efforts for the community.
2. Analyze existing water conservation efforts and develop appropriate water reduction
altematives including the following:
• Status and extent of inetering program.
• Extent of water audit pcogram and analysis of unaccounted water losses.
• History and development of water rate stcucture; review need to change in order to
encourage water conservation.
• Review of cucrent and planned regulations to encourage water conservation.
• Need for retrofitting programs for public and private structures.
• Need for pressure control and reduction program.
• Educational and informational programs that are available in the community.
3. Develop procedure for sequential water demand reduction for each water use group for
non-emergency short- and long-term periods.
4. Identify implementation steps necessary to effect water conservation plan.
5. Establish educational program for community residents and businesses.
H. Wellhead Protection
Narrative indicating the City's intent to develop a wellhead protection plan in accordance with
the rules set forth by the State Health Department at such time as they become adopted and a
schedule is set forth. Development of a wellhead protection plan is not part of this proposal.
I. Emergency Response Plan for Water Supply
1. Identify current emergency response procedures.
2. Identify new procedures that should be added based upon inventory and water system goals.
3. Develop revised emergency response plan which will include the following items:
• Easily understood map depicting well and service areas; and production and well
characteristics.
• Description of water system, treatment facilities, wells, pumps, and trunk lines.
• Description of interconnections with other communities including cooperative agreement
clauses; use of surface water, and availability of large, private wells.
• Discussion of feasibility of conjunctive use and potential limitations.
• Discussion of other feasible alternatives (i.e. use of treated water). �
22.06
4. Develop emergency demand reduction plan
� Review potential to reduce demand for each user group.
• Develop criteria to utilize in establishing effecdve demand reduction and allocation
programs.
• Establi�h progrdm for sequenciag demand reduction procedures for user groups.
• Establish allocation program.
• Develop implementation program which will include triggering mechanism� and
enforcement pnocedures.
J. Water Supply and Conservation Plan Imptementation
1. Establish public review and comment period.
2. Analyze impact upon Comprehensive Plan.
3. Amend Capital Improvements Program to reflect plan recommendations.
4. Amend official controls to allow for plan effectuation.
5. Program for review and update of plan,
Project Team �
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc fias assembied a team of professionals tailored to deliver this service to you.
Team leaders Ann Perry and Steve Campbell represcnt the most knowledgeable of the two disciplines required
to assemble elements, formulate, submit and obtain approval of this plan by the regulatory agencies. Lloyd
Pauly will support that team with his knowledge and background in managing and operating municipal water
systems, along with his background and accreditation in emergency management and response.
Ms Perry is a highly qualified and respected urban planner with aclmowledged expertise in the development of
comprehensive plans, environmental planning, and city-oriented planning acavides and strategies.
Mr Campbell is a senior project manager with over 20 years experience in the planning, d�sign, and
construction of municipal water systems throughout Minnesota. He has particular expertise in the areas of
water supply planning and the design and construction of supply and storage facilities.
Mr Pauly is a recognized public works manager who has over 30 years experience operacing and managing a
successful municipal water system. In addition, he is an experienced .emergency manager. Mr Pauly is certified
in ecnergency management by both the state Department of Emergency Management and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
This team will be supported by the entire staff of SEH with proven expertise in all disciplines of civil
engineering, environmental, and water resources managemen�
Responsibility of the City
SEH believes that for any plan to be effective, it must represent the thoughts and plans of the City. To that
extent, we will need the involvement from key members of your staff, including planning, and utility
management and operational personneL
Our proposal anticipates that key members of the city staff will be available for at least 8-12 hours for
interviews and review of City records and documents relating to the municipal watec system, emergency plan,
22.07
and the City's comprehensive plan elecnents. It is further anticipated in this proposal that the City will make
available.any records, maps, or documents necessary to be a part of this plan development.
This proposal does not include 5EH involvement in public meetings before the City Planning Commission or
City Council. However, we are available on an houdy basis to provide that support to the City and its staff.
SEH also expects that the City will be responsible for the distribution of this plan to neighboring communities
and agencies for their formal review and comment as part of the Comprehensive Plan amendment review
requirements. }
Fee for Service
SEH proposes to develop this plan in cooperation with the City of Fridley and in accordance with the enclosed
scope of services for a lump sum fee of $5,250.
Upon satisfactory completion of the draft plan, the City will remit 90°k of the above fee for services to SEH.
The remaining LO°lo will be invoiced after completion of the final plan.
Cost of printing and reproduction services will be charged in addition to the above stated fee.
Timetabte
Following your authorization to begin, we will complete the draft of the Water Supply, Emergency and
Conservation Plan in 30 days. Final submittal will be dependent upon the process the City deternunes to
follow for Planning Commission and City Council review and adoption. A final plan will be prepared which
incorporates any changes mandated by those bodies within one week of formal adoption of the Plan.
If this proposal is acceptable to the City of Fridley, please sign one copy and return it to this office.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. We look forwazd to working with you and your
staff on this project. .
Sincerely,
Ll yd M. Pauly
Business Development Representative
Accepted this day
of , 199_
City of Fridley
By:
Title: ____
22.�8
r
Daniel R. Boxrud, P.E.
Branch Office Manager
_2iE: �:.�.� •:.:. '� �`:. .:: ..i2�>'2� . �. , �`�.::� •� i:..�:��' '. ..:•�•: ,. . �'.,.�.>.> . ::...>i. ..�.�...'� .�.: 1)<.f �)�.Z).>i.�>t�i�t��J:���:1:�[H)iS.�A.vESi�:�:��.:..ti'KfJiix��.�1�)���>�1�1�)�>�7�>�)(>�)�>V)s>�1t1i1�)�I»5tiif25]Sit:>)SE575i�i57N5152 21t :� :.�.��>i)�:5251
TO:
FROM:
SIIHJECT:
DATE:
WILLIlIM W. BIIRNB, CITY MANAGER ��
�
RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRSCTOR
HOWARD D. ROOLICR, A88ISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR
DSSIGNATIONS OF FIIND BALANCL
February 9, 1995
Attached you will find a resolution for Council. consideration
amending the designations of fund balance in the General Fund and
formally adopting the designations in the Special Revenue Funds
and the Capital Improvement Fund.
Council approved four designations in the General Fund in 1991.
This resolution changes the amounts designated for working
capital and replacement of fixed assets. The amount designated
for working capital is being increased to .60% of the ensuing
year's budgeted local government aid plus the property tax levy.
The previous percentage was 50�. The increase -is needed to
better reflect our working capital needs for the first six months
of the year. Fifty percent was barely adequate since
expenditures do not occur evenly over the year and there was no
allowance for tax delinquencies.
The designation for replacement of fixed assets was increased
from 5� to 10 � of the General Fund investment in General Fixed
Assets. The percentage was increased to better reflect the
useful lives of the equipment acquired with General Fund
revenues.
The designations in the Special Revenue Funds identify the future
uses of fund balance. Each fund's purpose determines it's
designation. In addition, each fund has available a designated
for subsequent years e�enditures if the budget process has
identified a use of fund balance in the upcoming budget.
The Capital Improvement Fund has three designations corresponding
to the three non utility portions of the five year capital
improvement plan. The annual balance in these three designations
are equal to the balance of the five year plan.
.01
RESOLUTION NO. - 1995
RESOLIITION DESIGNATING MINIMIIM FIIND BALANC$S FOR THE
GBNERAL FDND, SPBCIAL REVENUI� FIINDS AND THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FIIND.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Fridley has previously
adopted Resolution No. 46-1991 designating minimum fund balances;
and
WHEREAS, the timing difference between cash receipts and cash
disbursements continues to create cash flow deficiencies unless
sufficient fund balance levels are designated to meet the working
capital needs in the first half of the year ; and
WHEREAS, unforeseen reductions in major intergovernmental
revenues or unanticipated expenditure needs remain a recurring
threat to cities; and
WHEREAS, establishment of a minimum designation of fund balance
for such contingencies would mitigate the adverse effects of aid
reductions or unanticipated expenditures; and
WHEREAS, anticipated uses of fund balances for planned future
obligations should be disclosed in the financial statements by
designation of fund balance; and
WHEREAS, formal establishment of minimum fund �balance levels
helps maintain the City's favorable bond rating which translates
into lower borrowing costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Fridley that to the extent of available fund balance, that
designations of fund balance be established at the end of each
year in the order set forth below:
GENERAL FUND
l. A designation for working capital equalling 60� of the
ensuing year's budgeted local government aid plus the property
tax levy (including any state paid portion);
2. A designation for subsequent years' expenditures for uses
of fund balance as set forth in the ensuing year's adopted
budget;
3. A designation for contingencies equal to 10� of the
General Fund budgeted expenditures and other financing uses
for the ensuing year;
23.02
�..._..... �... . , . .......... ... ��.,. , . . . „�� ,... .� ...r�n�.. .....o.,. .... .:x>... . . . ........ . . . . .._ . . . . �...� ....> .. ..,�,,.�,..cu.�..v . ...x..x> . ..,...., .. ..,.,. . ,. ..,�.<,...,.....,o. .,o� u... .�uo.3ooaw
4. A designation for replacement of fixed assets in an amount
not less than 10� of the General Fund investment in General
Fixed Assets as identified in the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report.
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
1. A designation for subsequent years' expenditures for uses
of fund balance as set forth in the ensuing year's adopted
budget;
2. A designation for subsequent years� expenditures for the
balance of the Cable TV equipment grant;
3. A designation for cable TV program for the remaining fund
balance in the Cable TV Special Revenue Fund;
4. A designation for solid waste abatement equal to the fund
balance in the Solid Waste Abatement Special Revenue Fund;
5. A designation for drug and gambling enforcement in the
Drug and Gambling Forfeiture Special Revenue Fund equal to the
entire fund balance;
6. A designation for housing programs for the entire fund
balance of the Housing Special Revenue Funds.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
1. A designation for fixed asset replacement equal to the
balance in the general portion of the capital improvement
plan;
2. A designation for park improvements equal to the balance
in the park portion of the capital improvement plan;
3. A designation for street improvements equal to the balance
in the street portion of the capital improvement plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
_TH DAY OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
23.03
�
�
Engineering
Sewer
water
Parks
Streets
Maintenance
MEMORANDUM
� �' '
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager�j� PW95-026
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
DATE: . February 7, 1995
SUBJECT-:• Water Treatment Study
Based on. the Council's comments at the January 23, 1995 Council
meeting regarding the water quality from our unfiltered wells, Tom
Roushar from Maier Stewart & Asssociates has submitted a proposal
to review the rehabilitation of Well No. 3, the Commons Park Filter
plant configuration for maximum iron and manganese treatment of
available wells, iron and manganese removal plants at We11s No. 1,
12, and 13, and a trichlorethylene (TCE) removal facility at the
Commons Park treatment plant. He proposes to join forces with an
electrical engineering, heating and ventilating, and architectural
firms in reviewing these issues. The contract is scheduled to be
completed within eight weeks at a cost not to exceed $14,800.
Based on the Council's water quality concerns, recommend the
Council authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a
contract for a water treatment study.
JGF:ch
24.01
/
�
�D�Y
I
I'lI1SI �TISC E11�11EERS
1326 Energy Park Drive
St. Poul, MN 55108
February 6, 1995
File: 900-215-00
612�baa-a389 Mr. John G. Flora
1-800-888-2923 Director of Public Works
Fax: 612-64d•9446 City of Fridley
Civic Center
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
RE: PROPOSAL; WATER TREATMENT STUDY
Dear Mr. Flora:
MSA, Consulting Engineers (MSA) is pleased to submit this proposal to complete the
r�n eNCwEEK�NC: water Treatment Study authorized by the City Council during their meeting of January 23,
ENVIRONMENiAI 1775. MSA will be prime consultant for the study. MSA will subcontract with Paul
`dUNICiPAL Kaeding of Kaeding and Associates, Tom Wentz of Wentz and Associates, and Bill
?L,NNING Hennemuth of Bordon/Hennemuth Architects. Mr. Kaeding, Mr. Wentz, and Mr.
��!:D WASTE Hennemuth will provide electric system, heating and ventilation systems and building
�;2�r�KA� construction costs, respectively.
_;;4v�v�tiG
-;,__ � Although Mr. Kaeding, Mr. Wentz, and Mr. Hennemuth all own separate firms, they share
-:.;,,s,��-„;;�� the same office space and same clerical staff. Therefore, in effeci, they function as a single
firm. This, of course, results in an efficient team.
°-:`�!C.al: rr„_�atiK..._
.�;G:he=��NG
-�:,�
:"NCk'�i5iw!3u �^�
hNLA
�''�Tean i.v�-.�,�� c
OfFICES IN:
MINNEAPOLIS
PRIOR tAKE
ST. PAUI
WASECA
As prime consultant, MSA will invoice the City of Fridley. Billings from Kaeding and
Associates, Wentz and Associates, and Bordon/Hennemuth Architects will be included in
MSA's invoices at MSA's cost with no markup.
MSA's proposal is presented in five sections: Background Information, Project Scope,
Work Scope, Budget, and Schedule.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The City of Fridley owns and operates a municipal water supply and treatment system
consisting of 13 wells and two water treatment plants. In addition, the City of Fridley
receives water from the City of New Brighton via the Fridley/New Brighton
Interconnection that was put into operation in May of 1994.
Itrprop/900/215-0608.feb � �•O �
A schematic of the City of Fridley water supply and treatment system is attached to this
proposal. Well No. 1 is an unfiltered well, as are Wells No. 12 and No. 13. Wells No.
2, No. 4, and No. 5 are filtered for iron removal by Filters No. 6 and No. 7 in the
Commons Park Water Treatment Plant (WTP). Wells No. 6, 7, 8, and 9 are filtered for
iron and manganese removal by Filters No. 1 through No. 5 in the Commons Puk WTP.
Wells No. 10 and 11 are filtered by the two filters in the Locke Park WTP. Well No. 3
is currendy not being used.
The City of Fridley has always pumped Wells No. 1, No. 12, and No. 13 unfiltered into
the water distribution system. In the past, these wells were only pumped on heavy
sprinkling days during the summer season. Polyphosphate addition and the rapid turnover
of water in the distribution system on heavy demand days kept iron and manganese
complaints related to the pumping of these wells to a reasonable level. However, due to
a trichloroethylene (TCE) contamination problem with Wells No. 6, 7, 8, and 9, the Water
Department operating staff has had to pump the unfiltered wells (No. 1, No. 12, and No.
13) more extensively in recent years. Rather than using these wells only on heavy
sprinkling demand days, the operating staff has had to operate these v�+ells to supply water
to meet moderate day demands.
Attached to this proposal is a summary of the water pumped from each of the City's wells
during calendar year 1994. It should be noted that Well No. 3 was not pumped at all.
Wells No. 6, 7, 8, and 9 collectively pumped only 180,564,000 gallons of water.
Although these wells have a combined capacity of approximately 6,000 gallons per minute
(gpm), they produced only a little over one-half the water that Well No. 4 produced. Well
No. 4 has a capacity of only 750 gpm.
Wells No. 10 and 11 collectively produced 220 million gallons of filtered water in 1994.
This volume of water is lower than the volume that would normally be produced because
the wells were out of service during the first half of the year while the Locke Park WTP
was being refurbished. In 1995, these wells will be available to produce filtered water the
enure year.
The pumping summary shows that 262,010,000 gallons of water were received from New
Brighton during 1994. Tfiis water is mostly unfiltered water. However, an iron and
manganese removal facility is currendy under construction at the PGAC WTP in New
Brighton. That facility is scheduled to be operational in September of 1995. After the
PGAC iron and manganese removal facility is operational, the water received from New
Brighton will have iron and manganese removed and the iron and manganese concentrations
will be comparable to the water produced by the Commons Park and Locke Park WTPs.
The last two attachments to this proposal show the iron and manganese concentrations in
each of the City of Fridley's water sources (Well No. 1, Well No. 12, Well No. 13, New
Brighton, Commons Park WTP, and the Locke Park WTP) and the percentage of unfiltered
water pumped by year from 1986 through 1994.
24.03 Page 2
ltcprop/900/215-0608. feb
Due to the fact that more unfiltered water has been pumped in recent years, complaints
resulting from iron and manganese have increased. In the project scope section that appears
on the following page, altematives for increasing the volume of filtered water and, thereby,
reducing the amount of unfiltered water that is being pumped will be discussed.
PROJECT SCOPE
The scope of the Water Treatment Study will include evaluation of feasible methods of
increasing the City's filtered water supply. Of course, the goal of increasing the City's
filtered water supply will be to reduce the amount of unfiltered water pumped, thereby
reducing the problems and complaints related to iron and manganese. Alternatives for
increasing the City's filtered water supply include the following:
• Rehabilitating Well No. 3 and putting it back into service.
■ Iron and manganese removal plants at Wells No. 1, No. 12, and No. 13.
■ TCE removal facility at the Commons Park WTP to remove TCE from Wells No.
6, No. 7, No. 8, and No. 9.
At this point, each of these alternatives will be discussed in greater depth.
Rehabilitating Well No. 3
Well No. 3 has been a problematic well, virtually since it was first drilled. Cunently, it
pumps excessive amounts of sand. The well pump is driven by a natural gas engine fitted
with a right angle gear drive. The starting system for the engine is not reliable. Because
it is driven by a natural gas engine, it costs more to operate Well No. 3 than any of the
other City wells. The well was equipped with a narural gas engine at the time it was drilled
to provide a standby source of water in the event of a iong term power outage, such as the
one that occuned following the 1965 tornado event.
The piping configuration at the Commons Park WTP requires that Wells No. 2, 3, 4, and
5 be pumped to Filters No. 6 and 7. Filters No. 6 and 7 have a combined capacity of
2,400 gpm. Wells No. 2, 4, and 5 collectively produce 2,400 gpm. Therefore, there is
no filtration capacity "left" for Well No. 3. If Well No. 3 is rehabilitated, it will also be
necessary to reconfigure the piping in the Commons Park WWTP to permit Well No. 3 to
be pumped to Filters No. 1 through No. 5 that are currently being used to a minor extent.
If the piping modifications are not made, there would be little point in rehabilitating Well
No. 3.
If Well No. 3 is rehabilitated and the piping at the Commons WTP is reconfigured, the
City's filtered water supply would be increased by 750 gpm, or approximately one mil�ion
gallons per day (1 MGD).
luprop/900/215-0608.feb � �' O � Page 3
.
�
Iron and Manganese Plants at Wells No. 1, No. 22, and No. 13
This alternative for increasing the City's filtered water supply would involve construction
of iron and manganese removal plants at each of these wells. Because the wells are so far
apart, it would not be feasible to construct a single plant to filter the water from all �
wells. The oost of the raw watermain to connect all three wells to a single location would
be prohibitively expensive.
This alternative would increase the City's filtered water supply as follows:
Well No. 1: 900 gpm or 1.30 MGD
Well No. 12: 1,600 gpm or 2.30 MGD
Well No. 13: 1,000 gpm or 1.44 MGD
TCE Removal Facility at the Commons Park WTP
This alternative would incre.ase the City's filtered water supply by virtue of the fact that it
would pemut full use of Filteis No. 1 through No. 5. Earlier in this proposal, it was noted
that the combined capacity of Wells No. 6, 7, 8, and 9 was approximately 6,000 gpm.
Yet, in 1994, these wells only produced approximately one-half the water that Well No. 4,
a 750 gpm well, produced.
Wells No. 6, 7, 8, and 9 are contaminated with TCE--a priority pollutant that is regulate�
by the Safe Drinking Water Act. To reduce the TCE level of the water leaving the
Commons Park WTP to below the requ2red maximum contaminant level of five parts per
billion, the Water Department operating staff must blend the water pumped from Wells No.
6, 7, 8, and 9 with the water pumped from Wells No. 2, 4, and 5. Wells No. 2, 4, and
5 collectively only produce 2,400 gpm. This necessity to blend greatly reduces the volume
of water pumped and the utility of Filters No. 1 through No. 5. In 1994, Wells No. b, 7,
8, and 9 produced only 180 million gallons of water. This volume of water could be
produced by a single 1,000 gpm well pumping only eight hours per day.
If a TCE removal facility were constructed at the Commons Park WTP, Wells No. 6, 7,
8, and 9 could then be pumped at their rated capacities. This measure would essentially
double the City's filtered water supply (from approximately 5,000 gpm to approximately
10,000 gpm). If a TCE removal facility were constructed at the Commons Park WTP, the
need to pump Wells No. 1, 12, and 13 would be limited to only high sprinkling demand
days or during large fires.
WORK SCOPE
As discussed above, the Water Treatment Study will evaluate alternative methods of
increasing the City's filtered water supply. The alternatives for increasing filtered water
supply include:
Itrprop/900/215-0608.feb
24.05
Page 4
■ Rehabilitating Well No. 3.
■ Iron and manganese removal plants at Wells No. 1, 12, and 13.
■ TCE removal facility at the Commons Park WTP.
This section of MSA's pmposal will describe the pmject tasks that will be completed for
the Water Treatment Study.
MSA is convinced that a high level of coordination is required between the staff of the City
of Fridley and MSA to optimize the benefits of the Water Treatment Study. MSA is
committed to providing this high level of coordination.
I, PROJECT MANAGF.MENT
A. Project Management
At MSA, the pmject manager is the focal point of all communication
between the client and the project team. This concept permits smooth and
effective communication between the client and the MSA staff inembers
assigned to the pmject. Tom Roushaz will be the project manager for the
Water Treatment Study.
B. Quality Assurance Reviews
Quality work is the hallmark of MSA's professional practice. MSA places
great emphasis on doing quality work to the client's satisfaction.
For the Water Treatment Study, MSA will assign a senior engineer to
complete an independent quality assurance review of the process design,
calculations, cost estimates, and final report.
II. PROJECT INITIATION/COORDINATION
A. Initiation Meeting with Fridley Staff
At the project initiation meeting, MSA will outline the data that will be
needed to complete the project. It is also MSA's intention that
communications channels be defined at this meeting.
B. Data Collection/Input Meetings
MSA anticipates addidonal meetings during the course of the Water
Treatment Study. The purpose of these meetings will be fourfold as
follows:
■ Collection/clarification of data.
� Allow opportunity for input by Fridley staff.
�c���oonis-obos.r� 2L�.06 Page 5
■ Provide progress updates of status to date.
■ Provide for interim review of work completed to date.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT TASKS
The description of project tasks to be completed by the MSA team follows.
III. PROJECT TASKS
A. Rehabilitating Well No. 3
1. MSA will complete the following tasks related to evaluating this
alternative:
a. Obtain well log, well video tapes, and past repair records.
b. Evaluate alternative well redevelopment techniques.
c. Evaluate replacu►S the existing pump and natural gas engine.
d. Evaluate an electric motor drive in lieu of a natural gas
engine/right angle gear drive.
e. Evaluate the need for a generator set in conjunction with an
electric motor drive.
f. Evaluate the piping modifications of the Commons Park
WTP to route water from Well No. 3 to Filters No. 1
through No. 5.
g. Prepare preliminary construction cost estimates.
B. Iron and Manganese Removal Plants at Wells No. 1, 12, and 13
l. MSA will complete the following tasks related to evaluating this
alternative:
a. Obtain property ownership records to determine if adequate
City-owned property exists for WTPs at these locations.
b. Research nearby available tracts of land if adequate City-
owned property does not exist.
c. Conduct process design for iron and manganese removal.
d. Complete preliminary designs and layouts for WTPs,
including:
1) Filtration systems
2) Chemical feed systems
3) Heating, ventilation, and dehumidification systems
4) Electrical systems
5) Backwash water reclamation or disposal systems
tup��oonts�os.f� 24.�7 Page 6
e. Prepare preliminary construction cost estimates.
f. Prepare preliminary operation and maintenance cost
estimates.
C. TCE Removat Facility at the Commons Park WTP
1. MSA will complete the following tasks related to evaluating this
alternative:
a. Evaluate alternative locations in Commons Pazk.
b. Conduct process design for TCE removal.
c. Complete preliminary designs and layouts for the TCE
removal facility, including:
1) TCE removal contactors
2) Heating, ventilation, and dehumidification systems
3) Electrical systems
4) Backwash water disposal system
5) GAC delivery system
d. Prepare preliminary construction cost estimate.
e. Prepare preliminary operation and maintenance cost estimate.
D. F'mal Report
l. MSA will prepare a final report of the Water Treatment Study. This
report will include:
a. Summary of estimated construction costs.
b. Summary of estimated operation and maintenance costs.
c. Fstimated effectiveness of each alternative to reduce iron and
manganese problems (i.e., reduction in unfiltered pumpage).
d. Impact of implementation of each alternative on water rates
(i. e. , amount of water rate increase to finance the
construction cost and operation and maintenance cost related
to each alternative.)
Fifteen (15) copies of the final report will be provided.
luprop/900/215-0608.feb 24.�8 Page 7
BUDGET
Labor
MSA will bill the City of Fridley monthly for work on the Water Treatment Study project.
The number of hours that each person works on the pr+oject and their respective hourly
billing rates will be the basis for labor billing. The anticipated ma�amum hours and labor
billing are summarized below:
Project Manager
Civil Engineer
Architect
Electrical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Technician
Clerical
TOTALS
Direct Expense
Maximum
Hnnrc
24
80
12
24
12
32
�
208
Maximum
Billing
Amnnnt
$ 2,160
4,800
900
2,040
900
1,920
�,n��
$13,800
In addition to labor billing, MSA will bill for the following expenses:
Mileage
AutoCADD
$0.30/mile for car travel
$0.35/mile for truck travel
$15/hour
The maximum billing for d'uect expenses is estimated at $1,000.
Malcimum Project Billing
The maximum project billing would be $14,800 ($13,800 +$1,000).
SCHEDULE
MSA, Consulting Engineers will complete the Water Treatment Study within eight weeks
of notice-to-proceed.
ltiprop/90�/215-0608.feb
24.09 Page 8
If you have any questions regarding our pmposal, please feel free to call me at 644-4389.
MSA is pleased to be considered to assist you with completing this project. I have enjoyed
my long association with the City of Fridley and look forward to its continuation
throughout this pmject.
If this proposal is acceptable, it can serve as the engineering services agreement for this
project. If acceptable, please have Mayor Nee and Manager Burns sign in the space
provided and return one copy to me.
Sincerely,
I • I 1 •
\ �
� � � � �� �� •��
Thomas A. Roushar, P.E.
TAR: tw
Accepted for the City of Fridley
By:
Mayor
By:
City Manager
Date:
lupcup/900/215-0608.feb 24• 1 � Page 9
m
To ois��BU�oN sYS�M
LOC�CE PAAK
WAT�R PLANT
TO OISTR18UilON SYSTEM
t2
WEI.L
(UNFlLIERED)
TO DISTR18UT10N SYSTEI�A
0
�
`''�� .AMMONS PAfl1C wF 1 ! .,
WAi�t PLANT
� �
TO DIST3�18U?lON SYSi�M
13
WELL
(UNFlLTERm)
� o o�sr�ieu�norv s�rs�
�
WELL
(UNFlLTERID)
WATE UPPLY SCHEMAi1C�
.11
WF.T,T, NO_
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
NEW BRIGHTON
TOTAL
9ooroo t-zoos;�
CTTY OF FRIDLEY
1994 WATER PUNII'AGE
�Y WFT,T,/�nTTRf'F.
24.12
24,095,000
267,545,000
-a
338,371,000
202,453,000
61,434,000
113,497,000
�.�9,000
184,000
i19.062,000
101,7Z3,000
1�7,063,000
182,872,000
262 10,000
1,835,763,000
� �/'i
� ��
; Z
�
O
�
Q
�
i �-
,z
w �-
UJ
�
Z �
O �
U w
Q
i W �
� Cn i-
W -�
Z °
Q �
: V �
z�
Q U
6
�
Z
Q
�Z
;O
��
-
N
�
�
�
�
��
:W
� : z
U ;�
J ' Q
� ; �
m (� �
Z �
�
� :.;;r;;� �
r ?:prC::�`.^.+j,.fYw (� L
� :.:pf�ir{i'.,?:� r
:..},4y:rcst-:�
0 O
Z LL
�— ao cfl � c� o
0 0 0 0
(�/��) NOIlb2�1N��N0�
N
�
�
Z
�
0
�
0
Y �
� �
aQ
Z�
oa
U �
° O
av
U W
�
o„
�_�
�Q
,� a;
w w:
Z Yi
11 �:
CO J
� Z aa
J
Z
O
�
�
�
�
�
Z
O
U
�
W
�--
Q
S
�
W
J
0
I�L�
�
�
�
�
0
�
�
�
�
M
0
�
\° �0
� �.
\ "
0
0
�
. o
0
�
� ..�,
, � ��-��
a�
a
0
�
,
o �o N
N �
� ��3
o '��
0
0
�
0
�
o N
�
� � ' ��.:;��,"�`
0
O
O
�
i
,
a
0
a �
�
� . �-�
�.
, �� _
�
�
�
,� �
� ^
� ��:
, �.
�
�
�
O�
�
�
�
�
�
N
�
rn
�
r
�
�
r
�Q
�w
�}
.
..
.
o -^�
� �
� ��� �
a � �
o -
o �
0
�
;
, �
�
rnro _,. ��,�,�
o _ -�°
0
0
�
0
�
�
0
N� � . „�� , ,.
D N � §��L .�,ra"M'�.
c ��;;.
O
O
N �
SNOl��18
NI SNO��`dJ
--- - - _
_ -- �4.-14 - _
0
�
J
�
>
0
W
�
�
�
Z
�
'
ti
� W
rn ��
�
J
� O
� J
r �
O
�
.