07/24/1995 - 4878'� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
UTYOF
"' F�a-� ATTENDENCE SHEET
Manday, Ju,2y 24, 1995
7:30 P.M.
;, PLEASE PRINT NAME, ADDRESS AND ITEM NUMBER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN
ITEM
PRINT NAME (CLEARLY) ADDRESS NUMBER
�� c o �' �+, :, r �. - J tc;� � �.- c� i1'� �i 4�_ 4-- ►�
�� . ���,t,�c, �Cf ,
-._-- '
Y N � G r v ��C �s� �� V L�,� c-
. C�� .� ��-� � = i' �' �Ci /, j'o/.> >�
� L c� �� r' �` ��- J�1.e�..�-,,� �� �/ 4� 2. _. y;
�
� r �_
.�s 1'1 i L !� � I.iS �9� /{'% � C�l � " /U�' S�u QGPF}�0 .
�C
c�, (`o� � � C�:.S � , � � _pV' � :
rG �v �G iv r✓ L. - ° �,
� G�� C� ,Z�}� /���
� -
- � � � � `� �': �,�" /
�= � c� � " �� �?- �t�� � % .�-%�
� ,r � � � M+l-�. eo ;�o � � 7�
�: �,�,ip;� •�1 r�N � ��' .!y�. �i N 1� �%' � � `iS ) O C✓ C-'v �f� 1 P- . t� 1'CC�f�/�.� .�`� 1-) '� �I ZZ
�
�
�`�� ���S�e.�
L� ������`z-�i
�i.l_ �. � � �/����
�//.1 ./.. � � ,� � 1�
C� L/.L�'�� �� _ � ���
+/ s
��_
�- � �
� / ` � / " _ �,.R- �` .. �
� � � � � -P / I.��
�j 6 a — R l c. .e G � z� % .r.���+cc� ,n; . =G. �, ��
� Z G <'�h �P,4 ����6c.' W �Q��) �.'r� � ��� � `c�l�.� /
� FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF
�
� � JULY 24,1995
FRIdLEY
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment,
or employment in its services, programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
disability, age, marital status, sexual orientarion or status with regazd to public assistance. Upon request,
accommodarion will be provided to allow individuals with disabiliries to participate in any of Fridley's services,
programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabiliries
who require auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance.
(TTD/572-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
PROCLAMATION:
National Night Out - Tuesday, August 1, 1995
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of July 10, 1995
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS:
Resolution Approving the Special Laws
Authorizing the Creation and the
the Implementation of a Housing
Replacement Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.01 - 1.05
�
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 24, 1995 Page 2
. ---• � • -`•-• � �� � s _►�i
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED.�
Approve Service Contract between
the Anoka County Community Action
Program, Inc., and the City of Fridley
for Joint Administration of the Home
Improvement Grant Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.01 - 2.15
Approve Agreement for the Curbside
Collection of Refuse befinreen the
City of Fridley and Waste Management,
Blaine and Walter's Recycling & Refuse . . . . . . . . . 3.01 - 3.14
Approve Agreement for the Curbside
Collection of Tree Branches and Brush
between the City of Fridley and Ceres
Environmentaf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.01 - 4.10
Approve Lease Agreement for Premises
In Holly Shopping Center between the
City of Fridley and Heartland University
Commercial Limited Partnership
(Temporary Site for Fridley Liquor
Warehouse) (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.01
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 24, 1995 Page 3
�--•• � • -�•-• . •, � .�
. = •► �
Approve Contract between the City of
Fridiey and Forest Lake Contracting
for the Addition of a Bike Path North
and South of the East River Road
County Highway Improvement
(Ward 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.01 - 6.02
Resolution Authorizing Municipal
State Aid Funds to County State
Aid Highway (CSAH) Osborne
Road - Commerce Lane to Fifth
Street (SAP 02-608-08) (MSAP
127-020-16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.01 - 7.02
Resolution Requesting the Posting
of "No Parking" Signs on Osborne
Road between Commerce Lane
and Fifth Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.01 - 8.02
Claims ................................... 9.01
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 24, 1995 Page 4
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUED�
Licenses ................................. 10.01-10.04
Estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.01 - 11.02
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Plat Request, P.S. #95-01, by The
Rottlund Company, Inc.; . . . . . . . . . . . 12.01 - 12.19
and,
Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-01,
by The Rottlund Company, Inc.; ...... 12.20 - 12.63
and,
Vacation Request, SAV #95-02,
by The Rottlund Company, Inc. ....... 12.64 - 12.73
Generally Located South of
Mississippi Street, West of
University Avenue and North of
Satellite Lane (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.01 - 12.73
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 24, 1995
OLD BUSINESS:
First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend
the City Code of the City of Fridley,
Minnesota, by Making a Change in
Zoning Districts (Rezoning Request,
ZOA #95-04, by Home Depot USA, Inc.,
to Rezone from C-2, General Business
and M-2, Heavy Industrial, to C-3,
General Shopping Center District,
Generally Located North of I-694 and
East of East River Road} (Ward 3}
(Tabled July 10, 1�995) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Page 5
............... 13.01-13.28
Resolution Approving a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment, CPA #95-01, by Home
Depot USA, lnc., for Property Located on
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 130,
Generally Located North of I-694 and
West of River Road on Main Street
(Ward 3) (Tabled July 10, 1995) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.01 - 14.28
Resolution Approving Plat, P.S. #95-02,
Home Depot Fridley Addition (by Home
Depot USA, Inc., to Replat Tract A,
Registered Land Survey #130 into Three
Separate Parcels, Generally Located
North of l-694 and East of East River
Road) (Ward 3) (Tabled July 10, 1995) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15.01 - 15.05
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 24, 1995 Page 6
OLD BUSINESS (CONTINUED�.
Special Use Permit Request, SP #95-05,
by Home Depot USA, Inc., to Allow
Garden Centers or Nurseries which
Require Outside Display or Storage of
Merchandise, and per Section 205.15.1.C.(7)
of the Fridley City Code, to Allow
Establishments of the "Drive-In" Type,
Selling, Serving, or Offering Goods or
Services Directly to Customers Either
Waiting in Parked Motor Vehicles or to
Customers who Return to their Vehicles to
Consume or use fihe Goods or Services
While on the Premises, Generally
Located North of I-694 and East of East
River Road (Ward 3) (Tabled July 10,
1995) ..................................... 16.01-16.05
Variance Request, VAR #95-12, by Home
Depot USA, Inc., to Increase the Maximum
Area of a Free-Standing Sign from 80 Square
Feet to 160 Square Feet; to Increase the
Height of a Free-Standing Sign from 25 Feet
to 40 Feet, Generally Located at the Northwest
Corner of I-694 and Main Street (Ward 3)
(Tabled July 10, 1995) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.01 - 17.22
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 24, 1995
I: T�TiTI =�1��IiI���
Page 7
Resolution Authorizing Agreements between
the City of Fridley and Recipients of 1995-1996
Federal Community Development Block Grant
Funds ..................................... 18.01-18.15
Special Use Permit Request, SP #95-06,
by ADE Leasing for Jiffy Lube, to Aflow
an Automobile Service Station and Motor
Vehicle Fuel and Oil Dispensing Service
in a C-2, General Business District,
Generally Located at 7609 University
Avenue N.E. (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.01 - 19.10
Receive Bids and Award Contract for
1995 Sealcoat Project No. ST. 1995-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.01 - 20.03
Informal Status Reports
ADJOURN:
.......................... 21.01
`f
�
F�2IDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 24,1995
�•
The City of Fridley will not discriminate against or harass anyone in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its services,
programs, or activities because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation or status
with regard to public assistance. Upon request, accommodation will be provided to allow individuals with disabilities to participate in any of
Fridley's services, programs, and activities. Hearing impaired persons who need an interpreter or other persons with disabilities who require
auxiliary aids should contact Roberta Collins at 572-3500 at least one week in advance. ("I"I'D�'S72-3534)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
PROCLAMATION:
National Night Out - Ty,�sday, August 1, 1995
/' .�
,
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
City Council Meeting of July 10, 1995
�`',�f�,��-�.( �tiy�^.G�n�
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS:
Resolution Approving the Special Laws
Authorizing the Creation and ttle
the fmplementation of a Housing
Replacement Program . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.01 - 1.05
�Z,C'-,�1 t�C c'%2�'�
Approve Service Contract between
the Anoka County Community Action
Program, Inc., and the City of Fridley
for Joint Administration of the Home
Improvernent Grant Program . . . . . . . . 2.01
f � �-�._. �,t.._�. , �.�-�-�.��
��f����
NEW BUSINESS (CONTINUEDI:
Approve Lease Agreement for Premises
In Holly Shopping Center between the
City of Fridley and Heartland University
Commercial Limited Partnership
(Temporary Site for Fridley Liquor
Warehouse) (V11ard 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.01
����,��_
Approve Contract between the City of
Fridley and Forest Lake Contracting
for the Addition of a Bike Path North
and South of the East River Road
County Highway Improvement
(Ward 3) . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 6.01 - 6.02
.� J. .
Resolution Authorizing Municipal
State Aid Funds to County State
Aid Highway (CSAH) Osborne
Road - Commerce Lane to Fifth
Street (SAP 02-608-08) (MSAP
127-020-16) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.01 - 7.02
��-�� "' �`� •
Resolution Requesting the Posting
of "No Parking" Signs on Osborne
- 2.15 Road between Commerce Lane
and Fifth Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.01 - 8.02
�,�,�`�'�'� Q��
� 9.01
Approve Agreement for the Curbside Claims . . . . . . . .i���� . . �. .
Collection of Refuse between the �
City of Fridley and Waste Management,
Blaine and Walter's Recycling & `�`��f
Refuse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.01 - 3.14 Licenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.01 - 10.04
0'�L' /���vV i,.°� \
L �
� Estimates . . . . . ���� . . . . . . . . . 11.01 - 11.02
�� � ��, .
Approve Agreement for the Curbside �/_ f �
Collection of Tree Branches and Brush��¢�cQ- �
between the City of Fridley and Ceres f /��5�%���
Environmental . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . 4.01 - 4.1�
�
ADOPTION OF AGENDA: � "''%� ,�I OLD BUSINESS (CONTINUED�
�,v,,,,.�� G'`,,�-r�./L.c"i���r ��./
�� ��.�' Speciaf Use Permit Request, SP #95-05,
OPEN FORUM. VISiTORS: � � �
(Consideration of Items not on Agenda - 15 Minutes)
C�-���� r?�. ����.� �e�L.� ^
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Plat Request, P.S. #95-01, by The
Rottlund Company, Inc.; . . . . . . . . 12.01 -12.19
and,
Rezoning Request, ZOA#95-01,
by The Rottlund Company, Inc.; ... 12.20 - 12.63
and,
Vacation Request, SAV #95-02,
by The Rottlund Company, Inc. ... 12.64 - 12.73
Generally Located South of
Mississippi Street, West of
University Avenue and North of
Satellite Lane rd 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.01 - 12.73
�� �� d �S-
_ _ ^� � /i ���s-
OLD BUSINESS: �� �
First Reading of an Ordinance to Amend
the City Code of the City of Fridley, <<
Minnesota, by Making a Change in
Zoning Districts (Rezoning Request,
ZOA #95-04, by Home Depot USA, Inc.,
to Rezone from C-2, General Business
and M-2, Heavy Industrial, to C-3,
General Shopping Center District,
Generally Located North of I-694 and
East of East River Road) (Ward 3)
(Tabled July 10, 1995) . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . 13.01 -
% y� �'ti��ti f S�/��r,v� s
�
Resolution Approving a Comprehensive
PlanAmendment, CPA#95-01, by Home
Depot USA, Inc., for Property Located on
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 130,
Generally Located North of I-694 and
West of River Road on Main Street
(Ward 3) (Tabled July 10, 1995) . . . . . . . .:. . . .
�.C�s i��� �9-��� ��!"����
�v�� .
;a
by Home Depot USA, Inc., to Allow Garden
Centers or Nurseries which Require Outside
Display or Storage of Merchandise, and per
Section 205.15.1.C.(7) of the Fridley City
Code, to Allow Establishments of the "Drive-ln"
Type, Selling, Serving, or Offering Goods or
Services Directly to Customers Either
Waiting in Parked Motor Vehicles or to
Customers who Return to their Vehicles to
Consume or use the Goods or Services
While on the Premises, Generally
Located North of I-694 and East of East
River Road (Ward 3) (Tabled July 10,
1995) .��;L.. . . 16.01 - 16.05
���� ` s� r�-�-C I
�
Variance Request, VAR #95-12, by Home
Depot USA, Inc., to Increase the Maximum
Area of a Free-Standing Sign from 80 Square
Feet to 160 Square Feet; to Increase the
Height of a Free-Standing Sign from 25 Feet
to 40 Feet, Generally Locafed at the No�thwest
Corner of I-694 and Main Street (Ward 3)
(Tabled Ju y 10, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17�01 - 17.22
<`� � . /G U �'! � �'�"
l �"..� -- .301 A� � � �
.� i y`'�_
NEW BUSINESS: G"'�� 5��� , �it-R-.-�.�-v'�-c-'
�-LtG-��-' r
Resolution Authorizing Agreements befinreen
the City of Fridley and Recipients of 1995-1996
Federal Communiry Development Block Grant
Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18.01 - 18.15
�:G��� ��
13.28 �
Special Use Permit Request, SP #95-06,
by ADE Leasing for Jiffy Lube, to Allow
an Automobile Service Station and Motor
Vehicle Fuel and Oil Dispensing Service
in a C-2, General Business District,
Generally Located at 7609 University
Avenue N.E. (Ward 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.01 - 19.10
�L�,,.�,,.�. — �(Q.���� a�r-e S�
14.01 - 14.28 �/ � p� '_'�''� •,���. ,�_.,,C..�
/tiR� ✓ a'`�'-�-�x�
Receive Bids and Award Contract for
1995 Sealcoat Project No. ST. 1995-10 ...... 20.01 - 20.03
Resolution Approving Plat, P.S. #95-02,
Home Depot Fridley Addition (by Home
Depot USA, Inc., to Replat Tract A,
Registered Land Survey #130 into Three
Separate Parcels, Generally Located
North of I-694 and East of East River
Road) (Ward 3) (Tabled July 10, 1995) ..� 15.01 - 15.05
�� �� ��.ti��'.�%�.�.� ,
;�=-�--� �_ C�Cti..� �� �ST" C tf-
�-°, .s�-""6 �
Informal Status Reports f/� fyt,, ...... 21.01
,�---�-,-�..�� �- �;,,�
ADJOURN: C o? , r�-f � r,�^'
William J. Nes
Mayor
fridleY, MN.
•
,�1�at�o �a�,�� �.t O ut 1995
�
}lugust 1, 1995
?�AS, oKTuesday, .August 1, 1995 �id2ey xeside,��ts u�ie2 eeP,ebt�ate';�I�atioKaQ,�I(igRt
Out'� akd CoKtikue e{�{foAts to iKVoQu�e youtR ik CXiw�e ptieVextiok be.c.QUSe 0.S a
gKOUp tQey aKe t6�e w�ost trxequext �ric±�w�s o{� exix�e; akd
�Wd�I�t2�tS, �id2�y W�e2sot� t�ousa�ds o� otRex eo►�,��ttes ac�oss tRe eou�t�y pKOMwttKg
CoopeAatiUe exiw�e, aKd dtiuc� pAeUeKtiok ok tRis KigQt; akd ��
�kl�I�t2F�iS, it is essextia� tRat ae� �ideey ettize�s, be �uade awaxe. o{� ,
exiw�e, pkevektioa pAOg�a�,s akd Row tQe,y eak xeduee c�i�e aKd -- �
dxug abuse �k ��d2e,y; akd
,
�Wd�l � 1�✓4S, Kei RboK�iood a�rane�tess, cowu+�uk�t ukit , akd Qice aNd �Q "�nb"�qod.Crirtw d� Or"gs
� y y p° A GOiNG iAIM/AV PARTY
cowuxuKity coopeaatiok ane t9�e iwtpotitakt tRe.�es o� t�e ��-
"�1(atioka2,�1Ii�Rt Out" p►�o�Ra�;
.�IaW, T��►�=�ot�, B� i�c2�so��V�tRat r, �w�e2►a�1..N�, MayoKO�-t�e
C�ty o� �x�deey do R�eby ptioe2at� Tuesday, .�4ugust 1, 1995 as
,�at i o�a Q�i ��.t O u-t
�k �nidQey.
B� rT"�UI2T-d�1��2 t2�S0��1(�'D T��4T ae� ��idee.y oitiZexs axe. �ae2ed upoK to joiK tRe
�xideey Po�ice�epaxtwtea+t aKd patiticipate ik, t�iel2t�i.�iKKuC1� °11jAtioKAQtjUi(�Rt Out" oK.�U(�uSt
lst, by Ravikg keigRboARood bP,oc� pakties to sywiboQieaQP�j ta�e bae(2 tRe Kic�R�t aKd giue �Kiw�e
a go�Kg away paKty.
�II�.JI(�SS�W�I�C��O�, I9�ac�e.set w�y Rakd
aad eause.d t�e seae o{� tRe L'ity o{� �tiideey to be
atr��x�. tR�S 2a.tR aQy o� Juey, 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE, MAYOR
THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL OF
JULY 10, 1995
The Regular Meeting of the Fridley City Council was called to order
at 7:12 p.m. by Mayor Nee.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Mayor Nee led the Council and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL• '
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBER ABSENT:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Mayor Nee, Councilwoman Jorgenson, Councilman
Schneider and Councilwoman Bolkcom
Councilman Billings
COUNCIL MEETING. JUNE 26, 1995:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to approve the minutes as
presented. Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote,
all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Nee stated it is proposed that
of business for tonight's meeting and
items before the consent agenda.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
the Council invert the order
consider the regular agenda
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to consider the regular agenda
items, before the consent agenda items, and move Item 4 of the
consent agenda to the regular agenda. Seconded by Councilwoman
Bolkcom. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee declared the
motion carried unanimously.
OPEN FORUM, VISITORS:
There was no response from the audience under this item of
business.
NEW BUSINESS:
10. FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA, BY MAKING A CHANGE IN ZONING
DISTRICTS (REZONING REOUEST. ZOA #95-04. BY HOME DEPOT USA.
INC._, TO REZONE FROM C-2, GENERAL BUSINESS, AND M-2, HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL, TO C-3, GENERAL SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICTL
GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF I-694 AND EAST OF EAST RIVER ROAD
jWARD 3)'
Ms. Dacy, Community Development Director, said that staff has no
remarks at this time, and Council has received staff's recom-
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JIILY 10, 1995 2
mendation. She stated that the traffic consultant and represen-
tatives of Home Depot are present to answer any questions.
Mr. Tim Platt, Real Estate Manager for Home Depot, stated that the
questions raised by Council concerning traffic on 53rd, 57th, and
61st Avenues have been addressed. He stated that one of the
biggest traffic generators of the entire development was an outlot
which would probably have been developed for a fast food
restaurant. He stated that Home Depot has agreed to remove this
outlot from the development and only develop the Home Depot parcel
and the additional retail. He stated that this would cut 100 peak
hour traffic trips in the morning hours and 170 trips in the
afternoon hours. He stated that the outlot would be landscaped and
probably used for some additional parking.
Mr. Platt stated that based on the new traffic data received from
the traffic consultant, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., there are
different traffic scenarios depending if Home Depot develops alone,
with additional retail, or a full development. He stated that as
far as truck deliveries, there would be approximately twelve common
carrier deliveries per day to the Home Depot store. He stated that
Home Depot can control the routes used by the truckers.
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that in the tra�fic study, the peak
hours of traffic during the week were addressed. She asked about
traffic on weekends arid the impact it may have on those persons
living on 53rd and 61st Avenues.
Mr. Platt stated that there would not be work-related traffic on
the weekends, so the traffic would be less than during the week.
Councilwoman Bolkcom asked about the amount of traffic that would
be coming off I-694 onto University and going north to make a left
turn at 57th Avenue.
Ms. Dacy stated that the number of vehicles would be between 22 and
60, depending on the zoning and the development. She stated that
with Home Depot's current request, the amount of vehicles would be
between 32 and 54. She stated that the traffic consultant, Barton-
Aschman had recommended that a study be completed in this inter-
change area, in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, to address the existing operational weave
deficiency.
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that if persans are having difficulty
crossing University Avenue at 57th Avenue, they would use 53rd or
61st Avenues, and this would impact some of those neighborhoods.
Mr. Platt stated that with the current zoning, there is the same
problem. He stated that if the City or the Minnesota Department
of Transportation were to undertake a study, they would be willing
to assist in some funding to determine if the traffic circulation
FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL MEETING OF JULY 10 1995 3
can be improved. He stated that they want to have easy access to
their site.
Councilwoman Bolkcom suggested that maybe access from Main Street
to East River Road should be explored to alleviate some of the
traffic.
Councilman Schneider asked if staff concurs with the results of the
traffic study that except for one intersection all the other
intersections basically operate at the same level of service. He
stated that it is beyond him how these figures are determined. He
asked if staff felt they were reasonable.
Mr. Hickok, Planning Coordinator, stated that he believed the facts
are accurate, and the study is very complete. He stated that the
report does point out the "weaving" problem with the westbound
vehicles coming off I-694 onto University and making a left turn
at 57th Avenue. He stated that the figures are based on recognized
ITE standards which are the source for trip generation rates for
various types of development.
Councilman Schneider asked if Home Depot would be willing to parti-
cipate in a study of this "weaving" pattern.
Mr. Platt stated that knowing how highway projects operate, the
cost may be substantial, but Home Depot would be willing to assist
in some funding.
Councilwoman Bolkcom asked if staff could obtain further informa-
tion on the costs.
Ms. Dacy stated that staff could contact the Minnesota Department
of Transportation to try and obtain further information and some
idea of cost. She stated that she did not know if Home Depot's
consultant had already done so.
Councilman Schneider stated that assuming the cost for the study
is reasonable, he questioned how the improvements would be funded.
Ms. Dacy stated that if Council chose to approve the rezoning, the
recommendation would be that Home Depot would be responsible for
the cost of the improvements for any work necessary as a result of
the development. She stated that this would pertain to University
Avenue and the function of the intersection.
Mr. Platt stated that Home Depot would be happy to offer assistance
in regard to University and 61st Avenues. If they get into rebuil-
ding highway ramps, that is something not caused by Home Depot.
He stated that they would assist with additional turn lanes but
not rebuilding highway ramps.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 10, 1995 4
Councilman Schneider asked what the plans were for the additional
retail.
Mr. Platt stated that the additional retail would probably include
a business like Pet Food Warehouse or something similar.
Mayor Nee asked for a comparison of trips generated in the morning
and afternoon peak hours for an industrial/commercial mix develop-
ment versus the Home Depot development.
Mr. Platt stated that for Home Depot only there would be 200 trips
in the morning (7:30 to 8:30) peak and 325 trips in the afternoon
(4:30 to 5:30) peak. He stated that with Home Depot and the
additional retail, there would be 215 trips in the morning and 395
trips in the afternoon. He stated that in an industrial/commercial
mix, there would 274 trips in the morning peak hours and 520 trips
in the afternoon peak hours.
CounciZman Schneider asked the basis for staff's recommendation for
denial of this rezoning.
Ms. Dacy stated that the City's Comprehensive Plan identifies the
site as industrial. Historically, development of this strip has
been industrial. She stated that there is no access to the west,
and staff is concerned about traffic impacts, however, the
developer has reduced the size of the development.
Councilman Schneider asked, from a planning perspective, if a well
run commercial establishment would be beneficial to the
neighborhood as a whole.
Ms. Dacy stated that staff spoke with Mr. Platt about the Hyde Park
neighborhood and the recent history and plans for redevelopment.
She stated that it was made clear that the City would expect strict
adherence to the maintenance codes, if Home Depot locates on this
parcel.
Mr. Platt stated that Home Depot is active in the Habitat for
Humanity program. He stated that their employees take an active
part in helping rebuild communities. He stated that they conduct
clinics on areas of home improvement, and their employees have gone
out to show persons how to erect a building. He stated that the
more Home Depot gets involved, the better it is for their business.
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that there are several persons in the
audience from the neighborhood who would like to comment on this
rezoning. She stated that they were not within the legal radius
to be notified of this rezoning; however, she would like to give
them the opportunity to submit their comments.
Ms. Lori Wood, 133 53rd Avenue, stated that she had concerns about
the traffic. She stated that they now have a lot of truck traffic
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 10, 1995 5
on weekdays. She stated that the traffic on weekends is relatively
quiet. She stated that there was a traffic counter on 53rd Avenue
and wondered if this included the weekend. She stated that she
felt Home Depot would probably bring more weekend and retail
traffic on 53rd Avenue. She presented a petition with 33 signa-
tures against this rezoning.
Mr. Greg Gaides, Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., stated that the
traffic counters were not installed by their firm, but traffic
counts were not done on the weekend.
Mr. Fred Dock, Barton-Aschman, stated that the traffic on 53rd,
57th, and 61st Avenues was all counted as part of this study. He
stated, however, that the average annual daily traffic figures are
from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. He stated that
in order to conduct the peak hour analysis, Barton-Aschman
collected those traffic volumes. He stated that they kept track
of turning movements at the intersections during peak hours.
Councilman Schneider asked if it would be possible to obtain
projections on weekend traffic for Home Depot's type of business
and for a mix of industrial/commercial.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to receive Petition No. 10-1995.
Seconded by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Michelle Brask, 5261 Horizon Drive, stated that she has concern
about the impact of Home Depot on their neighborhood. She stated
that recently Main Street was widened but the bridge was not, and
she wondered if anyone had considered the impact on that bridge.
She stated that they like to ride their bikes and walk in the
neighborhood, and they also like the peace and quiet.
Mayor Nee stated that an alternative may not be any better. He
stated that there is pressure to develop this land. Something will
go there, and the same issues will be before Council.
Ms. Kathy Nordos, 171 53rd Avenue, stated that she shares the same
concerns about the traffic. She stated that she is concerned that
there is no access to the west to go to East River Road. She
stated that their neighborhood is a residential area, and they live
with the traffic during the peak hours. She felt that the traffic
would be much greater if Home Depot locates on this site.
Councilman Schneider stated that he shares the concerns about the
traffic. He stated that in reviewing the traffic figures, the
traffic would be heavier if the land develops as it is now zoned.
He stated that he wanted to be sensitive to the needs of the
residents, however, the question is what is best - a reasonable
retail development, or possibly an industrial development which may
have a greater impact on the neighborhood.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JIILY 10. 1995 6
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that Gateway Foods was one possible
project for this parcel, and this would mean a lot of truck
traffic.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table this rezoning request,
ZOA #95-04, to the July 24, 1995 Council meeting in order for staff
to obtain further information regarding weekend traffic, access to
East River Road, and consultation with the Minnesota Department of
Transportation. Seconded by Councilman Schneider.
Mr. Platt stated that he has no problem with this request being
tabled. He stated that he hoped the additional information will
help everyone with their decision.
Councilman Schneider asked Mr. Platt about Home Depot's time table.
Mr. Platt stated that they would like to begin construction this
year and break ground by mid-October.
Councilwoman Jorgenson asked if the Metropolitan Council had
reviewed and submitted comments regarding this rezoning.
Mr. Hickok stated that the Metropolitan Council had ten days to
respond, and the City has not received any communications. He
stated that he felt any major issues would have been addressed
within this time period.
UPON A VOICE VOTE TAKEN ON THE ABOVE MOTION, all voted aye, and
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
11. RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT, P.S. #95-02 HOME DEPOT FRIDLEY
ADDITION (BY HOME DEPOT USA INC TO REPLAT TRACT A,
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY #130 INTO THREE SEPARATE PARCELS�
GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF I-694 AND EAST OF EAST RIVER ROAD)
(WARD 3):
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table this plat request, P.S.
#95-02, to the July 24, 1995 Council meeting. Seconded by Council-
man Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
12. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST SP #95-05 BY HOME DEPOT USA�
INC., TO ALLOW GARDEN CENTERS OR NURSERIES WHICH RE4UIRE
OUTSIDE DISPLAY OR STORAGE__OF MERCHANDISE. AND FER SECTION
205.15.1.0 (7) OF THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE TO ALLOW ESTABLISH-
MENTS OF THE "DRIVE-IN" TYPE, SELLING, SERVING OR OFFERING
GOODS OR SERVICES DIRECTLY TO CUSTOMERS EITHER WAITING IN
PARKED MOTOR VEHICLES OR TO CUSTOMERS WHO RETURN TO THEIR
VEHICLES TO CONSUME OR USE THE GOODS OR SERVICES WHILE ON THE
PREMISES, GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF I-694 AND EAST OF EAST
RIVER ROAD (WARD 3):
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table this special use permit
request, SP #95-05, to the July 24, 1995 Council meeting. Seconded
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JIILY 10. 1995 7
by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor
Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
13. VARIANCE REQUEST, VAR #95-12, BY HOME DEPOT USA, INC., TO
INCREASE THE MAXIMUM AREA OF A FREE-STANDING SIGN FROM 80
SQUARE FEET TO 160 SQUARE FEET; TO INCREASE THE HEIGHT OF A
FREE-STANDING SIGN FROM 25 FEET TO 40 FEET GENERALLY LOCATED
AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF I-694 AND MAIN STREET:
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table this variance request, VAR
#95-12, to the July 24, 1995 Council meeting. Seconded by Council-
man Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye, Mayor Nee
declared the motion carried unanimously.
14. RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, CPA
#95-01, BY HOME DEPOT USA, INC., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON TRACT
A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 130 GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF
I-694 AND WEST OF RIVER ROAD ON MAIN STREET (WARD 3):
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to table this comprehensive plan
amendment, CPA #95-01, to the July 24, 1995 Council meeting.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Schneider asked if a neighborhood meeting may be bene-
ficial on the Home Depot issue.
Councilwoman Bolkcom stated that she would be willing to attend
such a meeting and will work out a time and contact the residents.
4. RESOLUTION NO. 40-1995 DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND
APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE JULY 11, 1995, STATE
REPRESENTATIVE HOUSE DISTRICT 52A SPECIAL ELECTION:
Councilwoman Jorgenson stated that this is an unfunded mandate, but
she would move the following:
MOTION by Councilwoman Jorgenson to adopt Resolution No. 40-1995.
Seconded by Councilwoman Bolkcom.
Councilman Schneider stated that he assumes the election will be
held and in all fairness to the election judges, they will be paid.
He stated that there are two points to be made: (1) this is an
unfunded mandate; and (2) the election was called in haste for some
reason that is not clear. He asked if this resolution was not
adopted, what would happen.
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that staff would be in a position
of spending money without Council's authority.
Mr. Herrick, City Attorney, stated that without Council's adoption
of this resolution, he was not sure if staff could pay the election
judges.
FRIDLEY CITY COONCIL MEETING OF JULY 10, 1995 8
Councilman Schneider stated that perhaps what needs to be done is
to send a letter to the Governor with a statement and bill and to
publish that in the local media.
UPON A ROLL CALL VOTE TAI�N ON THE ABOVE
Jorgenson, Councilwoman Bolkcom, Councilman
Nee voted in favor of the motion. Mayor Ne
carried unanimously.
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA:
NEW BUSINESS•
MOTION, Counciiwoman
Schneider, and Mayor
e declared the motion
l. RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
JUNE 21, 1995•
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that Council is requested to
receive the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of
June 21, 1995.
RECEIVED THE MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
JDNE 21, 1995.
2. ESTABLISH A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AUGUST 14..1995, APPROVING AN
ORDINANCE RECODIFYING THE FRIDLEY CITY CODE. CHAPTER.205�
ENTITLED _!!ZONING." BY AMENDING SECTION 205.25.8.C, AND
REPEALING SECTION 205.24. AND ADOPTING A NEW SECTION 205 24
CREATING FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS:
Mr. Burns stated that the ordinance was first adopted in 1977
to limit development in flood way and permit development that
meets standards in the flood fringe district. He stated that
the regulations require minimum first floor elevations and a
special use permit to build in the flood fringe district.
Mr. Burns stated that the amendments provide for the creation
of a third district, "General Fl:oodplain District" that
includes both the flood way and flood fringe districts. He
stated that the amendment also provides additional standards
for manufactured homes, manufactured home parks, and placement
of travel trailers and travel vehicles. He stated that there
are no changes to the ordinance as it relates to flood way and
flood fringe districts and no changes to boundaries of these
districts. He stated that since Fridley does not permit manu-
factured homes or travel trailers in flood way or flood fringe
districts, these amendments will have no affect on Fridley
residents. He stated that the changes are at the request of
the Federal Emergency Management Association and the Depart-
ment of Natural Resources.
SET PIIBLIC HEARING ON THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT FOR AIIGUST 14�
1995.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 10. 1995 9
3. RECEIVE PETITION NO. 9-1995 AND AUTHORIZE INSTALLATION OF A
SUMP PUMP DRAIN LINE ON BACON DRIVE:
Mr. Burns stated that a petition has been received from resi-
dents at 7601, 7613, 7627, 7639, 7651 and 7665 Bacon Drive
requesting a sump pump drain line be installed at the rear of
their properties. He stated that the City's contribution is
in lieu of the $450 sump pump disconnection benefit, and the
project will begin after September 15, 1995.
RECEIVED PETITION NO. 9-1995 AND AIITHORIZED INSTALLATION OF
A SUMP PUMP DRAIN LINE ON BACON DRIVE.
4. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING PLACES AND APPOINTING ELECTION
JUDGES FOR THE JULY 11, 1995, STATE REPRESENTATIVE HOUSE
DISTRICT 52A SPECIAL ELECTION:
THIS RESOLUTION WAS CONSIDERED WITH THE REGOLAR AGENDA ITEMS.
5. RESOLUTION NO. 41-1995 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING A
REVISED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENCIES IN ANOKA COUNTY TO ESTABLISH A PRISONER TRANSPORT
SERVICE FOR ANOKA COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES:
Mr. Burns stated that to assist with the transport of
prisoners to the Anoka County Jail,� the Anoka Regional
Treatment Center, and the Anoka County Juvenile Shelter
Facility, eleven law enforcement agencies, on a rotational
basis, provide personnel to operate a transport vehicle during
assigned shifts. He stated that the vehicle, training and
equipment is provide by the Anoka County Sheriff's Department.
He stated that this service will require an officer and a
Community Service Officer between 7:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. on
Friday and Saturday nights and once every eleven weeks. He
stated that this would be a trial operation from June 30, 1995
to October 31, 1995. He stated that this would not impact the
City's insurance costs.
ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 41-1995.
6. RESOLUTION NO. 42-1995 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF FRIDLEY AND STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS FIRE
INSPECTION•
Mr. Burns stated that the resolution provides for fire
inspection of all public schools in Fridley every three years.
He stated that the inspections are conducted in accordance
with the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code, and the State Fire
Marshal provides training for City Fire Department personnel.
He stated that the term of the agreement is July 10, 1995 to
December 31, 1997.
ADOPTED RESOLOTION NO. 42-1995.
FRIDLEY CITY COIINCIL MEETING OF JIILY 10� 1995 10
7. CLAIMS-
APPROVED CLAIM NOS. 62600 THR�IIGH 62867.
8. LICENSES•
APPROVED THE LICENSES AS SIIBMITTED AND A8 ON FILE IN THE
LICENSE CLERR�S OFFICE.
9. ESTIMATES• :-
APPROVED, AS FOLLOWS:
Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered
301 Fridley Plaza Office Building
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
Services Rendered as City Prosecuting
Attorney for the Month of May, 1995. ....$14,092.50
Standard Sidewalk
29635 Neal Avenue
Lindstrom, MN 55045
1995 Miscellaneous Concrete Curb, Gutter
and Sidewalk Project No. 279
Estimate No. 3 . . . . . . . . �. . . . . . . $ 5,451.17
There were no comments form the audience regarding the consent
agenda items.
MOTION by Councilwoman Bolkcom to approve the consent agenda items.
Seconded by Councilman Schneider. Upon a voice vote, all voting
aye, Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously.
15. INFORMAL STATUS REPORTS:
EAST RIVER ROAD BIKEWAY:
Mr. Burns, City Manager, stated that a meeting was held with the
residents on East River Road on June 29 regarding the proposed
� bikeway. He stated that Councilwoman Bolkcom was present at the
meeting, and the residents' liability was discussed. He stated
that also disaussed was the requirement for constructing a bikeway
along East River Road.
Mr. Burns stated that it was pointed out by Jon Olson of Anoka
County that with the Federal Highway Administration funding the
project and the high volume of vehicles on East River Road, the
City really did not have a choice. He stated that if the bikeway
was not constructed, the City would be hard pressed to explain why
it was not included.
FRIDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 10, 1995 11
Mr. Burns stated that it is recommended the City continue with the
bikeway/walkway as planned. He stated that information was
provided to the residents regarding contacts with the Federal
Highway Administration and the personnel associated with the
bikeway/walkway at the Minnesota Department of Transportation. He
stated that the residents were not happy with this decision, but
there are other instances in which the City has complied with the
neighborhood wishes.
JOINT HRA AND COUNCIL MEETING. JULY 17, 1995:
Mr. Burns stated that there would be a joint HRA and Council
meeting on Monday, July 17, 1995 at 6:30 p.m.
BUDGET SESSION, JULY 18, 1995:
Mr. Burns stated that he would like to cancel the budget work
session scheduled for July 18 and reschedule it for another date.
He stated that this would give staff more preparation time.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION by Councilman Schneider to adjourn the meeting. Seconded
by Councilwoman Jorgenson. Upon a voice vote, all voting aye,
Mayor Nee declared the motion carried unanimously and the Regular
Meeting of the Fridley City Council of July 10, 1995 adjourned at
8:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Carole Haddad William J. Nee
Secretary to the City Council Mayor
�
Q
C�
�
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Cammunity Development Department
HOUSING AND REDE�7ELOPMENT AUTHORITY
City of Fridley
July 20, 1995 �
William Burns, City Manager �
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Grant Fernelius, Housing Coordinator
Consider Resolution Approving Special Law
Authorizing the Creation and Implementation of a
Housing Replacement Program
Over the course of the last several months staff, with the help
of Jim Casserly, has been working at the State Capitol to push
for a pilot housing replacement program. We are pleased to
report that a bill was passed by the Legislature and signed by
the Governor on June 1, 1995. We should point out that this
pilot program is only authorized for the cities of Fridley,
Crystal, Minneapolis and St. Paul.
This unique legislation, which operates on same principle as tax
increment, provides the mechanism for the Fridley HRA to recoup a
portion of the costs involved in buying and demolishing blighted
homes. The program will allow the HRA to capture a portion of
the taxes generated by each new home constructed on an HRA lot
for a period of fifteen years. The funds can be used to help
finance up to 50 additional property acquisitions over the life
of the program.
Staff is currently working on a draft housing replacement plan
which will be presented to the HRA and City Council in September.
In addition, the City Council will need to hold a public hearing.
A chronology of events is attached for your review. The
resolution presented for consideration at this time is the first
step in the process and simply makes the special legislation
effective.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council
Approving the Special Laws Authorizing
Implementation of a Housinq Replacement
GF/
M-95-415
1.01
approve a resolution
the Creation and
Program.
Council Member introduced th� following
resolution, the reading of whzch was dispensed with by unanimous
consent, and moved its adoption:
GZ'�'X OF FRIDLEY
COUNTY OF AN4KA.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVTNG THE SPECIAL LAWS AU'I'HORIZING THE CREATION
.AND �'FiE IMPLEMENTATION OF A HOUSING REPLACEMENT PROGR�M
W�-i�REAS, 1995 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 264, �irticle 5,
Sec�ions 44 thr�ugh 47 (the "Speci.al Laws") were enacted by the
Zegi�lature of the State of Minnesota and signed into law by
Governor Arne Carlson on June 1, 1995 and rela�e �o the crea�ion
and implementa�.ion of a housing replacement program within the
Ci�y of FridZey, Minnesota (the "City");
WHEREAS, Minnesota Sti��utes, Section 645.021, subd. 2,
provides �hat special Iaws shall not be e£fective wi�hout
approval �f the lacal governmen�a� unit;
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.02 providea that a
�pecia? �.aw is required to be approved by the J.ocal governmen�aZ
��ni� a�£ected before it becames effective and, upon approval lay
the affected local government uniti, will be effective the day
foZy�wing the date on which the certificate ot appraval required
��nder P�linnesota Statutes, Section 645.Q21, subd. 3, is tiled with
�he Secretary of State, un.less a Iater date is specified in the
Act; and
WHEREAS, the Special Laws do not provide for an effective
date which is later than the day followzng the da�e on which the
��ertiticate o� approval is fi].�d with �he Secretary of State.
NOW, TH�.REFORE, �E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Fridley, Min.rae�ota, as �ollows:
l. The Special Laws are hereby appxoved.
2. The City C7.erk is hereby directed to file certificates
Uf approval tor each of �.h� Special Laws wa.th the Secretary of
State, including a certified copy ot this resol.ution with each
certificate.
3. The Special Laws are effective the day after the datie
the certa.ficates of approval are filed w�th the Secretary of
:�tate .
�.�2
b 1 �-J3�-JJ��� Ci=15SEF.LY' �t'�IOL�HHN � �-321 POtl
Adopted by the Council of the City this
, 1995.
_1 UL 1.1 "�5 1 �l : � _
day of
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolutzan was duly
seconded by Council Member , and upon vate
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and th,e following voted against tihe same:
whereupon said resolution was deciared duly passed and adopted,
and wa� sxgned by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk.
��,TTES'� :
City Cle
CERTIFICATION
Mayor
I, William Champa, the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of
�"xa.dl.ey, �'ounty of Anaka, Minnesota, hereby certify that the
iaregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.
passecl by the City Cauncil on the day of , 1995.
William Champa, City Clerk
1.03
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF SPECIAL LAW
BY THE CITY 4F FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF ANOKA
TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MINN�SOTA:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, That the undersigned chief cl.erical
o�ficer of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, (�he "City") do�s
hereby certi,�y, that in compliance with the provisians at Laws
2995, Chap�er 264 requiring approval by a majority vote af the
�overning body a� the City before it becomes effective, the Ci�y
�'ouncil at a meeting duly held on the day vf ,
1995, by �.esolution No, did approve aaid Laws 1995, Chapter
264 by a majarity vote of aIl the Council Members thereof:
Aye$.
Nays:
Abs�nt
ar not
Voting:
A copy of the resolution is hereto annexed and made a part
af this certificate by reterence.
S EAI,
1.04
Ci�y C1erk
b 1. �-.=:�.��-.1.=i�� C+H55�t�:'L Y. I"IIJL�HH(V �cJ r-'✓J� .� uL 1 c � J 1 J ��
cxROrroLOa�r
FOR
ADOPTION OF IipU3ING �EPLACEMBNi' pROGR�iD�
CREATION OF HOIISINC� RTspLAC�1�T DISTRICT
------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, August 10, 1995:
Thursday, September 14, 1995:
Friday, September 22, 1995:
Manday, October 2, 1995:
Monday, October 2, 1995 or
Monday, October 16, 1995
1.05
HRA Meeta.ng: review of
Housing Replacement Program
HRA Meeting: approval and
adoption of Housing
Replacement Program and
creation of Housing
Replacement District
Notice of public h�aring
published in City'e official
newspaper {not les"s than 10
nvr more than 30 days prior ta
public hearing}
Public Hearing: City Council
xeview df F:ousing Replacement
Program
City Council Meeting: City
CouncYl approval and adoption
of Hausing Replacement Program
and creation oi Hou�zng
Replacement District
�J
Q
�
Community Development Department
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
City of Fridley
DATE: July 19, 1995
TO: William Burns, City Manager ��
����
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Grant Fernelius, Housing Coordinator
SUBJECT: Consider Service Contract with ACCAP for Joint
Administration of the Home Improvement Grant
Program
Since 1993, the City and HRA have used both CDBG and HOME funds
to provide grants to low-income homeowners for improving their
homes. Due to the tremendous amount of time and staffing
required, we have contracted with Anoka County CAP to help
administer the program.
As in previous years the City will market the program, take
applications and identify those who are eligible for the program.
ACCAP will provide inspection services, work write-ups, help the
homeowner obtain estimates and seZect a contractor, monitor work
performance, and conduct initial, interim (if necessary) and
final inspections.
This year the City received $155,210 in CDBG funds, of which
$124,210 was allocated for housing rehabilitation. ACCAP has
agreed to administer its portion of the program for $10,663; the
actual amount available for home rehab grants is $110,547 which
will help between 7 to 10 households. Depending on the number of
code repairs, up to $15,000 is available per household.
Since the 1995 CDBG funds only became available on July lst,
staff began marketing efforts this past May and June and sent out
more than 30 applications to interested households. Eight
households actually applied and seven were prescreened and
determined eligible. Upon approval of this contract ACCAP
should be able to start inspections in a few weeks.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council approve
Contract with ACCAP and further that the Mayor
Manager are authorized to sign the agreement.
GF/
M-95-4 14
2.� �
the Service
Protem and City
''' Equal Opportunity Empbyer' '' 1995 CDBG Funds
SERVICE CONTRACT
between
ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM, INC.
and
CITY OF FRIDLEY
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of . 1995, the date of the signatures of the
parties herein notwithstanding, by and between the City of Fridley, a public body corporate and politic
under the laws of the State of Minnesoia (the "City'�, and the Anoka CouMy Community Actan
Program, Incorporated, a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, with its offices at 1201 - 89th Avenue N.E.,
Btaine, Minnesota 55434 (the "Contractor").
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHER�AS, Title l of the Housing and Commun'ity Devetopment Act of 1974, as amended, provides for
a program of Community Development Block Grants; and
WHER�AS, the City of Fridley has submitted an appiication for the Urban Anoka County Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, said application has received approval by Anoka County and the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development for the expenditure of funds, in part, to deliver the
Fridley Home improvement Grant Program (the "Program'�; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor has agreed to jointly administer said Program for the City, which proposal
has bee� accepted by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:
1. TERM
The project to be accomplished by the Contractor hereunder shall run from July 1, 1995 to June 30,
1996, unless earlier terminated as provided herein, or until all obligations set forth in this agreement
have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
1 of 11
2.02
2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
2 of 11
A The Contractor shail provide the folbwing services to administe� the Progrom:
(1) Verity property title records, prepare repayment ag�eements for signature by
Proyram recipients, and insure said repayment agreemeMs are properly
recorded with Anoka Coanty.
(2) Coordinate and conduct inspections of prope�ties to be improved under the
Program and prepare bid specifications for work to be performed.
(3) Assist Program �ecipients in obtaining estimates for the work to be pe�formed.
In addition, provide the Program recipient with the options available in
selecting contractors.
(4) Meet with Program recipients to review estimates and select a contractor per
the Program requiremeMs.
(5) Insure that the successful contractor compiies with the applicabie HUD and
County regulations.
(6) Monitor performance of rehabilitation work and assist Program recipient in
resolving disputes with contractors, as necessary.
(� Conduct interim and final inspections and prepare the necessary documents to
process paymertt to the contractor. Said documents shall be routed through
the City's Housing Coordinato� for approval prior to submission to Anoka
County for processing.
B. In addition to the processing steps outlined above, the Contractor shall provide the
following services:
(1) Compile and maintain lists of participating construction contractors.
(2) Comply with the Housing Rehabilftation Procedures Guide, as amended from
time to time.
(3) P�ovide the City of Fridley with monthly reports on the status of program
aPPlications.
2.03
�
3 of 11
(4) Make paymeMs to cor�tractors on a timely basis, in compliance with the
Federal 'three-day n�le'.
(5) A�cquire mechanic's tiens from a11 contractors, subcontraciors, and material
suppiiers, prior to release of any payments.
C. In addition, the CoMractor shall proceed with the administration of the Program as
contained in the Program Budget, attached as Exhibit A and made a part of this
contract by reference, representing Contractors minimum responsibilities to the extent
that said proposals have not been accomplished prior to the date of this Contract as
entered into and to the extent said proposals do not contradict the standards and
requirements referred to above.
D. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to meet ali standards and satisfy all
requi�ements expressed in Tdle I of the Housing and Community Devebpment A�ct of
1974 as amended and the HUD Implementary Regulations at 24 CFR, Part 570, and
any other appiicable federai statutes, rules, o� regulations established now or hereafte�,
and any appiicable statutes, rules, regulations, or guidelines established now or
hereafter by the State of Minnesota or any of its agencies. ShoukJ it appear to the
Contractor at any time during the course of implementing said project, that the work to
be done has not been explained or described in sufficient detail; or with sufficient
clarity, or should it appear that any plan, proposal, o� other material conflict with any
standards or requirements imposed by statute, regulation, or HUD, the Contractor shall
promptly apply to the City's Housing Coordinator or other designated representative.
In no event shall the Contractor proceed with administration of said project in
uncertainty. The Contractor shall comply with the folbwing requirements and
standards of OMB Circular No. A-122, "Cost Principles for Non Profit Organizations" or
OMB Circular No. A-21, "Cost Principles for Educational Institutions", as applicable, and
with the folbwing Attachments to OMB Circular No. A-110:
(1) Attachment A, "Cash Deposiiories", except for paragraph 4 conceming deposit
insurance;
(2) Attachment B, "Bonding and lnsurance";
(3) Attachment C, "Retention and Custodial Requirements for Records", except that
in lieu of the provisions of paragraph 4, the retention period for records
pertaining to individual CDBG activities starts from the date of submission of
the annual performance and evaluation report, as prescribed in 570.507, in
which the specffic activity is reported on for the final time;
2.04
(4) Attachmeni F� 'Standards for Financial Management Systems';
(5) Attachment H, 'Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance', paragra�h 2;
(6) AttachmeM N, 'Property Management Standards", except for paragra�ph 3
conceming the standards for real property, and except thad paragr�hs 6 and 7
aze so modified so that
(i) In all cases i� which personal properry is sold, the proceeds shall be
program income, and
(i� Personal property not needed by the subrecipient for CDBG activitie.s
shail be transfened to the recipient for the CDBG program or shall be
retained after compensating the recipient; and
(� Attachment O, "Procurement Standards".
3. PROJECT METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURE
The Contractor, in providing the services described in Section 2 of this Contract, shall empby methods
and procedures that are deemed to be appropriate, reliable, and professional by individuals, fim�s, and
associations regularly engaged in work of a similar nature. The methods and procedures empbyed
shall include those required by the sources of authority spec'rfied in Section 2, herein, but shall not
necessarily be limited to such methods and procedures.
4. PROJECT EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE
In order that the City may be kept i�formed of the Contractors progress and properly evaluate the
success of the Contractor in achieving the Contract goats, the City may make suggestions, criticisms,
and recommendations to the Contractor and the Contractor shall on a monthly basis and at other
times upon request by the Ciry, send a written progress report to the City's Housing Coordinator. Said
report shall a) summarize the activities and progress of the Contractor to date, b) detail special
problems or difiicuRies ihat have arisen during ihe course of the project which need to be brought to
the attention of the City and c) summarize any other information, problems, or proposals which the City
needs to know in o�der to properly evaluate the actions of the Contractor in working towards the
Coniract goal. The Contractor shatl thoroughly and conscientiously implement the proposals,
recommendations, and criticisms of the City or its designated representative, in writing, before
proceeding further with the impleme�taYwn of the program so that the goals of this Contract may be
met to the satisfaction of the City.
4 of 11
2.05
Any deviations from the goais, sta�dards. and requi�ements of the project as determined by said
designated represernatives of the City shail be conected by the Contractor before proceeding fu�ther
with the impiementation of said project.
5. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION. PERSONNEL. AND RECORDS
A The Contractor shaN engage in the implementatwn of the Program, such individuals as
are necessary for its proper completion. The Contractor warrants and represents that
ail of its employees shall be properly trained, competent and qualified to
perform the tasks assigned to them. The Contractor shall provide the C'tty with such
information regarding the qualifications of said individuals as �eguired by the City to
verify that present and subsequent services are being rendered by competent and
trained people. Ali individuais engaged by the Contractor to perform services under
this Contract must receive express approval of the C'dy before commencing any
services under the Contract. Any or all of said individuals may be regular empbyees
of the Contractor or may be spec'rficaliy empbyed by the Contracior as independent
contractors to work on the implementation of said project. However, the Contractor
shall not subcontract with any other firms, associations, consulti�g agencies, or other
organizations for the implementation of the Program, wfthout the exp�essed written
approval of the City.
B. The Contractor shall maintain records on all individuals employed by it in the
implementation of the Program. Said records shall show the name and qualifications
of each such individual, the tmurty rate of pay for each such individual, and the number
of hours worked by each such individual, and the days on which such hours were
worked. The Contractor shall also maintain, and complete in conect form, all other
records required by the rules, regulations, or guidelines of HUD or by Tdle I of the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended and the HUD Imple-
mentary Regulations at 24 CFR, Part 570. The Contractor further agrees to maintain all
such required records for three years after receipt of final payment or until all other
pending matters are closed.
6. DATA PRIVACY
All data collected, created, received, maintained, or disseminated, or used for any purposes in the
course of the Contractor perfomnance of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government
Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes 1984, Section 13.01 et. seq. or any other applicable State
statutes and any State rules adopted to implement the Act, as wel4 as State statutes and Federal
regulations on data privacy. The Contractor agress to abide by these statutes, rules, and regulations
and as they may be amended.
5 of 11
2.�6
7. NONDISCRIMINATION
6 of 11
A. General
The Cor�tractor shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws proF��iting discrimination on
the basis of age, sex, marital status, race, creed, cobr, national origin, sexuat orientatbn, or
the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap o� any other basis now or hereafter
prohbited by Law. These requireme�ts are specified in Section 109 of the Housing and
Community Devebpment A�ct of 1974; Civil Rights A�ct of 1964, Title VI; Civil FGghts A�ct of 1968,
Tdle VIII; Executive Order 11063; Executive O�der 11246; Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968; and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363. Specificaily, the Contractor is
prohibited from taking any discriminatory actions defined in the HUD Regulat'ans at 24 CFR
570.602(b) (1-3) and shall take suci� affirmative and conective actions as are required by the
Regulations at CFR 570.602(b)(4).
B. Proaram Benefit
The Contractor shall not discriminate against any resideM or Program recipient by de�ying
benefit from or participation in any block grant funded �tivity on the basis of race, cobr, sex,
or national origin. (Civil Ftights Act of 1964, Tttle Vi; Civil Rights A�ct of 1968, Title Vil; Section
109, Housing and Community Development Act of 1974).
C. Fair Housinq
The Contractor shall take necessary and appropriate actions to prevent discrimination on the
basis of Minnesota State law or federal law in federally assisted housing and lending practices
related to loans insured or guaranteed by the federal government. (Civil F�ghts Act of 1968,
Tdle VII; Executive Order 11063; Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363).
D. Emplovment
In all solicitations under this Agreement, the Contractor sha!! state that aN
qualified applicants will be considered for empbyment. The words 'equal
opportunity empbyer" in advertisements shall constitute compliar�ce with this
section.
2. The Contractor shal( not discriminate against an empioyee or applicant fo�
empbyment in connection with this Agreement because of age, marital status,
race, creed, color, natbnal origin, sexual orientation, or the presence of any
2.�7
7 of 11
sensory, mental, or physical handicap. except when there is a bona fide
occupat'anal limitatan. Such actan shall include, but not be qmited to the
folbwing: Empbyment, upgrading, demotion or transfe�, recruitment or
recn�itmeM advertising, layoff or terminatan, rates of pay or ather fom�s of
compensa#ion, and selection far training. (E�cecutive Order 11246 as amended
and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363.)
3. To the greatest extent feasible, the Contr�tor shail provide training and
empbyment opportunities for lower income residents within the area served by
bbck g�ant assisted projects (Section 3, Housing and Community
DevebpmeM Act of 1968, as amended).
E. Contractors and Suppliers
No contractor, subcontractor, union, or vandor engaged in any activity under
this Agreement shail discriminate in the sale of materials, equipment, or labor
on the basis of age, sex, marital status, r�e, creed, cobr, national origin,
sexual orieritation, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical
handicap. Such practices include upgrading, demotion, recruiting, transfer,
layoff, termination, pay rate, and advenisement for employment. (Executive
Order 11246 as amended and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363).
2. All firms and organizations described above shall be required to submit to the
Agency cert'rficates of compliance demonstrating that they have, in fact,
complied with the foregoing provisions; provided, that certificates of
compliance shall not be required from firms and organizations on contracts
and/or yeariy sales of less than $10,000.
3. To the greatest extent feasible, the Contractor shail purchase suppiies and
services for activities under this agreement from vendors and contractors
whose businesses are located in the area served by bbck grant funded
activities or owned in substantial part by project area residerrts. (Section 3,
Housing and Community �evelopment Aact of 1968, as amended.)
F. Notice
1. The Contractor shall include the provisions of the appropriate subsections A, B,
C, D, and E of this section in every contract or purchase order for goods and
services under this Agreement and shall send to each labor union or
representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreemeM
o� other contract or understanding a notice advising the said labor union or
workers representative of the commitments made in these subsections.
2.�8
2. In advertising for empbyees, goods, or services for activities under this Agreement. the
Contractor shall utilize minority publications in addition to publicatans of general
circulatan.
8. EARLY TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the City at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written
notice, delivered by mail or in person, to the Contractor. This Agreement may be terminated by the
City immediately upon the receipt by the City oi notice of ihe bss of federal funding for the Community
Developmeni Block Grant Program (CDBG). For pu�poses of giving notices hereunder, the address of
the Contractor is 1201 - 89th Avenue N.E, Blaine, MN 55434. Upon termination, the Contractor shall
be entitled to receive as compensation, payment for work actuaily performed to the date of terminatan
as determined by the schedule of payment referred to in Section 10 (Compensatian).
9. DEFAULT AND REMEDY
A. My of the folbwing constftutes a default on the part of the Contractor.
(1) Failure to proceed with the impiementation of the Program at a pace
reasonably ca�ulated to implement such program within the time limits stated
herein;
(2) Failure to conscientiously abide by ihe directions of the City.
(3) Failure to abide by any other term or condition of this Contract.
B. In the event of defa�ft, the Ciiy shal! have ihe option of terminating this Contract upon
written notice of termination sent to the Contractor at its address written above.
Termination shall be effective immediately upon receipt of notice of terminatwn by the
Contractor, or at such later date as the written notice shall state. Upon termination, the
City may recover from the Contractor any and all damages directly or consequently
arising out of the bre�h of this contract or failure to perform the same by the
Contractor.
10. COMPENSATtON
As complete compensation for the services to be performed hereunder by the Contractor, the
Contractor apply for reimbursement of adminisiratan e�enses directiy from Anoka County, but oniy
after receiving written approval from the City autF�orizing said reimbursement. In no event shall the
totai payment exceed the sum of the administrative fee column in Exhibii A.
8 of 11
2.09
The Contractor agrees that ali compensation received wAi be used to compensate the Contracto� oniy
for costs incurred in providing necessary services hereunder, and for no other purposes. Any
compensation received by the Contractor in excess of said necessary costs shall be promptly refunded
to the City upon tem�►ination of this contract or upon demand by the City.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The relatanship of the Contractor to the City is that of an independent contractor. Nothing in this
Contr�t shall be construsd so as to deem any empbyee or agent of the Contractor an empbyee of
the City for any purpose.
12. GOODS AND SERVICES NOT PROVIDED FOR
No claim tor goods or seroices iurnished by the Contractor not provided for by the tem�s ot this
Contract, or by duly authorized aiterations or modi�ications of this Contract, will be honored by the City
13. CHANGES IN THE CONTRACT
The City shali not'rfy the Contractor in writing at least five days before any change in this Contract is to
take effect.
14. ASSIGNMENTS AND SUBCONTRACTING
A. The Contractor shall not assign any portion of this Agreement without the written
consent of the City, and it is fu�ther agreed that said consent must be sought by the
Contractor not less than thirtv (30) davs prior to the date of any proposed assignment.
B. Any work o� services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shaU be subject to each
provision of this Agreement and proper bidding p�ocedures contained therein. The
Contractor agrees that it is as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of
its subcontractors and of their empfoyees and ageMs, as it is for the acts and
omissions of its own empioyees and age�ts.
15. INDEMNIFICATION
The Contractor agrees to indemn'rfy, defend, anci hold harmless the City {inciuding its Council
members, officers, and empioyees) from all claims, bsses, or damages which they, or any of them
shall be legally obligated to pay as a consequence of any negiigent act or omissan, any intentional
tort, or any violation of the terms of this agreement, by the Contractor (including its officers,
9 of 11
2.10
empbyees, and agents) in the performance of its services that are the subject of this agreemeM.
16. REVERSION OF ASSETS
Upon the expiratiort or termination oi this agreeme�t, the Contractor shal! transter to the City any
CDBG funds on hand or in the accounts �eceivabie attributable to the use of CDBG funds. In additan,
at the expiration or termination of this agreement, any reai property under the Contractors coMrol that
was acquired or improved in whole or in part with CDBG funds in excess of $25,000.00 shall be
disposed of in a manner which results in the agency being reimbursed in the amourit of the cuneM fai�
market value of the property less any portion thereof attributabie to the expenditures of norrCDBG
funds for acquisition of, or improvement to, the real property. Such �eimbursemeM shall not be
required if the conditions of 24 CFR State Statute 570.503(b)(8)(� are met and satisfied.
i7. DISPOSITION OF PROGRAM INCOME
Upon the expiration or termination of this agreement, program income shalt be retumed by the
Contr�tor to the City.
18. INSURANCE
The Contractor shall comply with the following insurance requirements:
10 of 11
A. Public Liabilitv Insurance
The Contractor shall obtain and maintain continuously during the term of ihis
agreement general liabilfty insurance of an amount not less than One Million and
no/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars which covers bodily injury and property damage and an
�mbre!!a excess liabiliry policy of Three Million and no/100 ($3,000,000.00) Dollars and
provide proof of Workers Compensation Insurance pursuant to the Statutes of the
State of Minnesota. The general liability insurance policy and umbrella excess liability
policy shaU name the City as an additanal insured.
B. Proof of Insurance
The Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance required under this section, or,
upon request of the City, dupticates of the policies as evidence of the iruura�ce
protection afforded. Such insurance policies shall not be reduced or cancelled without
sixty (60) days prior written notice to the City.
2.11
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT/REQUIREMENT OF A WRITING
It is understood and agreed that the e�tire agreement of the parties is contained herein and thaot this
CoMract supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations betwee� the parties reiating to the subject
matter hereof as welt as any previous Contract presently in effect between the City and the Contractor
relating to the subject matte� hereof. My alterations, variations, modi%cffiions, or waivers of the
provisions of this Contract shall be valid only when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed
by the parties.
20. EXHIBITS
The following attachments listed below are hereby incorporated in this agreement and made a part
hereof:
Exhibit A - Program Budget
Exhibit B - Certiiication
Exhibit C- 24 CFR 85; Contracting with smail and minority firms, women's business enterprise,
and labor surplus area fim�s.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties here hereunder set their hands as of the date written below:
CITY OF FRIDLEY
By
Date:
BY
Date:
11 of 11
ANOKA COUNTY COMMUNITY
ACTION PROGRAM, INC.
By -
Date:
BY -
Date:
2.12
EXHIBIT A - PROGRAM BUDGET
Source
1995 CDBG Allocation
Uses
Administration to ACCAP
Home Improvement Grants
2.13
AmouM
$124,210
$13,663
110 547
$124,210
Exhibit B
CERTIFICATIOt�f
The Undersigned, on behalf of the Agency, certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and
befief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to infiluence an officer or empioyee of
any agency, a Member of Cong�ess, an o�ce� o� employee of Cong�ess, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any
Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement,
and the extension, continuation, renewa{, amendment, or modification of any �ederal contract,
grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) lf any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to infiuence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member
of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of C�ngress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned
shail complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Repo�t Lobbying," in
acco�dance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned sha(I require that the language of ihis certification be incfuded in the
award documents for all subawards at af{ tiers (incfuding subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts
under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all sub�ecipients shal( certify and
disclose accordingly. �
This certifcation is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was pfaced �vhen t�is
transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making
or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1332, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who
fai(s to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less th�� S10,00� an�
not more than S100,000 for each such failure:
AGENCY
By:
Its:
Date:
By:
Its:
Date:
2.14
Exhibit C
(24 CFR 85}
Administratfve Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State, Local & Federaliy
Recognized fndian Triba! Governments
!e, Con[roC:fng wun smoll and
minvri:y�irms. women's business
en[e: p: ise and /obor s�rp/us area jrr•r,;s.
(1) The grantee and subgrante° will take
a(1 r•cce�• z.y affir;r:ative steps to assi:re
ihat minority firms. wpmen's business
enterprises. and labor surplus area fircis
are used when possible. �
(2) Aflir,-rative steps snall include:
(i) Placing qualified smalt and
minority businesses and women's
b4siness er.te:-��ises on solicitation lists:
(iiJ Assu:iag that snall and minority
businesses: and wor,.en's business
entecprises are solicited wnenevQr tne}•
are poten;ial so�:rces.
(iii) Dividin3 to:al requireraents. w7en I
economicaf(y ieasible. into s:nalle: tasics �
c: qcan:ities to permit maximu.*a I
pa::icipat:on by small and r..inorit�•
ous�::e:_`. 21G� WO :12I: 5 OL'S1R_°SS i
er.terp:ises: �
(:�•) °s;ao(is'r.i^3 ee!iver_.• sc^ecules. �
�•�a�v ��e : eq::i-�;;;< : pe..^..iu. K• :ic- I
e�cc�:z�e �ar;iciparc : bt• s-at, a .c (
n:no;e:r bu3ir,ess. a^c �.•c^er.'s �
b�s�aess e ::e�=ses: �
(t-? �'si^� tne se:1•ices zr.d ess;sta:.:._ ,
c: , �e 5-a:. ..�sine�s �.cr:...�s!rat�_ _.
a::_ tne �::^o:it�• ��s:..�ss Deveio�r.:e... '
. �
r,ge::c�• .._ .^e Derz.-._.._ c,; Co.-..._.c_. i
c(vij Re=�i:i^ ^e -^e concracee- i: j
su�co; t:a:ts a e�:c oe 1�;. tc taxe t: � I�
a;ti�ati�•e ste�s l:stec' ir, pa:ac:a?^s I
(��r'1 fil t�rou_` `'. ei tnis sec:ior..
2.15
I _
�
DATE:
TO:
Community Development Department
G DIVISION
City of Fridley
July 20, 1995
William W. Burns, City Manager���
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott H'ickok, Planning Coordinator
Lisa Campb�lanning Associate
SUBJECT: Council Action: Consideration of Agreements for Refuse Collection on Saturday,
September 16, 1995
On Saturday, September 16, 1995, as part of the Fridley Pride Citywide Clean-Up Week, refuse,
appliances and large furniture will be collected from the curbside of ail Fridley households. In order
to obtain contractors for the refuse collection pragrarn activity, Council directed staff to solicit
Requests for Proposals. On June 13th, the City received only two RFP's from Waste Management,
Blaine and Walter's Recycling & Refuse for a total of nine refuse trucks. Forty trucks are needed to
complete this activity. Council and the Clean-Up Committee directed Lonni McCauley, Executive
Director, of Fridley Pride Citywide Clean-Up Week to continue in negotiations with the refuse
haulers. After three weeks of negotiations with the refuse haulers, Lonni McCauley, and same
participation by City staff, the following agreements have been negotiated and are before you for
consideration and approval.
Waste Management will provide 35 trucks at an hourly rate of $180 per hour, not to exceed 15 hours.
Walte�'s Recycling & Refuse will provide 5 trucks at $160 per hour, not to exceed 15 hours. Each
truck will be staffed with a two person crew. The total program cost based on these price per trucic
hours is given below:
Truck Time
Waste Management, Blaine
Walter's Recycling & Refuse
Subtotal
Dist�osal Costs
Total Estimated Costs
3.01
$ 94,500
12.000
$ 106,500
+ 68.648
$ 175,148
William W. Burns, City Manager
July 20, 1995
Page 2
Staff estimate of disposal cost is high It assumes 300 pounds per household and 100% participation.
A�reement Features
Under the proposed agreement, the Contractors will not be paid for more than 15 hours. If the
Contractor fails to complete collection by September 17th, there is a performance bond of '75% of
the value of each agreement that may be cashed. Collection will begin at 6 a.m. on Saturday,
September 16th and shall be completed by 6 p.m. on the same day. The ageement also waives City
licenses, but the Contractor must be licensed in Anoka County. ,
StaffRecommendation:
Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the
agreements for refuse collection with Waste Management, Blaine and Walters Recycling & Refuse.
If you have any questions regarding this recommendation, please feel free to contact Lisa at extension
#594.
LC:da
M-95-413
3.02
AC;REEMBNT FOR T8E CIIRBSID$ COLLECTION OF REFII88
TiIIS AGREEMENT IS MADE ON , DAY OF , 1995,
BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY (CITY) AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, BLAINE,
MINNESOTA,(CONTRACTOR).
WHEREAS, the Contractor is in the business of collecting refuse.
WHEREAS, the City desires the Contractor to collect refuse from
the curbside throughout the City's municipal limits in accordance
with the terms of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legal2y bound, agree
as follows:
1.
2.
Contractor Service Recruirements: The Contractor agrees to
provide CURBSIDE COLLECTION OF REFUSE.
Refuse: is waste which normally results from the operation
of a household including rubbish. Refuse includes useab2e
carpeting, household furnishing, household furniture,
electronic and scrap wood. Refuse does not include body
waste, food waste, leaves, grass or other soft bodied garden
waste, construction or remodeling debris resulting from a
contractor, shingles, sheetrock, recyclables, major
app2iances, tires, oil, oil filters, fluorescent lamps,
household hazardous waste, and/or any other item prohibited
by State and Federal statute from Solid Waste management
processing facilities.
Col?ec�?on Veh?cle Ern�ipmea-�t Rec�uirements: Each collection
vehicle shall be equipped with the following:
a. a two-way radio
b. a first aid kit
c. an approved 2AlOBC Dry Chemical Fire Extinguisher
d. warning flashers
e. warning alarms to indicate movement in reverse
f. signs on the rear of the vehicle which state "This
Vehicle Makes Frequent Stops"
g. a broom and a shovel for cleaning up spills
h. OSHA required rear view mirrors that extend out from
the vehicle a sufficient distance to clearly see and to
safely operate the vehicle in reverse.
All of the required equipment must be in proper working
order.
3.03
FOR THE CIIRBSIDE COLI,ECTION OF REFIIBE
All vehicles must be clean and maintained in proper working
order.
All vehicles must be clearly identified on both sides with
Contractor's name and telephone number.
3. Personn�l Re�irements: Contractor shall retain sufficient
personnel and equipment to fulfill the requirements and
specifications of this Agreement.
Contractor's personnel shall:
a. Conduct themselves at all times in a courteous
manner with the general public.
b. Make a concerted effort to have at all times a
presentable appearance.
c. Perform their work in a neat and quiet manner,
clean up all material spilled in collection and
hauling operations.
d. Avoid damage to property.
e. Not perform their duties or operate vehicles while
consuming alcohol or illegally using controlled
substances or while under the influence of alcohol
and/or such substances.
4. Weighing of Refuse and Reporting Rec�uirements: Contractor
will keep accurate records consisting of an approved weight
slip with the date, time, collection route, driver's name,
vehicle number, tare weight, gross weight and net weight for
each loaded vehicle.
Collection vehicles will be weighed empty before collection
to obtain a tare weight and weighed after completion of
collection. An original of each weight ticket shall be
included as part of the billing sent to the City by
September 30, 1995. Contractor will provide a final report
of the total tons collected.
5. Ownershia: Ownership of the refuse shall remain with the
person placing it out for collection until Contractor's
personnel physically touches the refuse for collection, at
which time ownership shall transfer to Contractor.
�2)
3.04
AGRBBMFNT FOR THS CIIRBSIDE COLLECTION OF REFIISB
-.. .� . ;- -
The City shall notify residents to place their refuse at
curbside before 6 a.m. on Saturday, September 16, 1995, and
separate from other materials placed at the curbside.
7. PrQCedLre for Unacc�t�table Refuse If Contractor determines
that a resident has set out unacceptable materials, the
driver shall use the followinq procedures:
Curbside:
a) Contractor shall leave the unacceptable
materials.
b) The driver shall record the address on forms
provided by the Contractor and acceptable to the
City and report the addresses to the City at the
end of each collection day.
8. Collection Point: Refuse shall be collected from the
curbside. Refuse shall be collected, managed and disposed
of in accordance with State law.
9. Collection Hours. Residents will be required to place
refuse at curbside before 6:00 a.m. on September 16, 1995.
Collection shall commence at 6:00 a.m. The Contractor shall
maintain sufficient equipment and personnel to assure that
all collection operations are completed by 6:00 p.m. on
September 16, 1995.
10. C an�g ResBonsibilitv. Contractor shall adequately clean
up any material spilled or blown during the course of
collection and/or hauling operations. All collection
vehicles shall be equipped with at least one broom and one
shovel for use in cleaning up material spillage.
� .. . ;- -
The proposer shall dispose of the material as per State
Law.
12. Insurance Coveraae. Contractor shall provide a certificate
of insurance as proof of liability coverage or death in the
amount of $600,000 for any one person and in the sum of
1,000,000 for two or more persons for the same occurrence
and for damages to property in the sum of $3,000,000. The
certificate of insurance shall name the City as an
additional insured and state that Contractor coverage shall
be the primary coverage in the event of a loss. Further,
the certificate shall provide for thirty (30) days written
(3)
3.05
AGREEMENT FOR TH8 CIIRBBIDE COLLECTION OF REFUSE
notice to the City before cancellation, expiration, or
change of coverage.
13. Comtiensation for Services: The City will pay $180.00 per
hour for each truck with a two person crew, not to exceed 15
hours, and $54.00 per ton disposal costs. The Contractor
shall provide an invoice detailing per hour truck time and
per ton disposal costs.
14. Method of Pa,yment: Contractor shall submit an itemized bill
for collection services provided to the City
within 15 days after collection has been completed. This '
bill shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made
to the City. The Contractor shall submit the documentation
and reports as required under Paragraph Four of this
Agreement, with the invoices. Payment to the Contractor
will not b,e released unless the required reports are
included with the invoice. '
15. Term: means the one month period from September 14, 1995 to
September 19, 1995.
16. Indesendent Cont actor: At all times and for all purposes,
the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an
employee of the City. No statement herein and in the
executed Contract shall be construed so as to find the
Contractor to be an employee of the City�
17. Subcontractor: The Contractor may enter into subcontracts
with refuse haulers licensed in Anoka County for services
provided for under the executed Contract for the services
specified herein. All subcontractors must provide a copy of
their license to operate in the County and a Certificate of
Insurance.
18. Assignments Neither party shall assign the executed
Contract, nor any interest arising therein, without the
written consent of the other party.
19. Services Not Provided For: No claim for services furnished
by the Contractor not specifically provided for herein shall
be honored by the City.
20. Severabilitv: The provisions of the executed Contract are
severable. If any portion hereof and in the executed
Contract is, for any reason, held by a court of competent
jurisdiction, to be contrary to law, such decision shall not
affect the remaining provisions of the same contract.
21. om8??ance with Laws and Regu?at?ons: In providing services
hereunder and in the executed Contract, the Contractor shall
abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations
(4)
3.06
AGREEMENT 80R THL CIIRBSZDB COLI�ECTION OF REFIIBE
pertaining to the provision of services to be provided
hereunder. Any violation shall constitute a material breach
of the executed Contract.
22. Equal o��ortunityi During the performance of the executed
Contract, the Contractor, in compliance with Executive Order
11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and Department of
Labor regulations 41 CFR Part 60, shall not discriminate
against any employee or applicant for employment because of
race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The
Contractor shall take affirmative action to insure that
applicants for employment are qualified, and that employees
are treated during emplayment, without regard to their race,
color, religion, sex, or national origin.
23. Waiver• Any
provisions o
respect, the
Contract.
waiver by either party of a breach of any
f the executed Contract shall not affect, in any
validity of the remainder of the executed
24. Indemnification: The Contractor shall indemnify and hold
harmless the City, its employees and aqents, for all claims,
damages, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited
to, attorneys' fees, which they may suffer or for which they
may be held liable as a result of the fault of the
Contractor, his employees, or subcontractors in the
performance of the executed Contract.
25. Workers Comnensatinn - Insurance: The Contractor shall
provide workers compensation insurance covering all
employees of the contractor engaged in the performance of
the executed Contract, in accordance with the Minnesota
Workers' Compensation Law.
26. Performance and Pavment Bond: The Contractor shall execute
and deliver to the City a performance and payment bond with
a corporate surety for 75� ot the value of the contract.
The executed Contract shall not become effective until such
a bond in a form acceptable to the City has been delivered
to the City and approved by the City Attorney. The executed
Contract shall be subject to termination by the City at any
time if said bond shall be cancelled or the surety thereon
relieved from liability for any reason. The term of such
performance bond shall be for the life of the executed
Contract. Extensions or renewals shall require the
execution and delivery of a performance bond in the above
amount to cover the period of extension or renewal.
27. IJtilities: The Contractor shall be obligated to protect all
public and private utilities whether occupying street or
public or private property. If such utilities are damaged
(5)
3.07
AGREEMENT FOR THL CIIRBSIDE COLLECTION OF REFUSE
by reason of the Contractor's operations,,under the executed
Contract, he/she shall repair or replace same or, failinq to
do so promptly, the City shall cause repairs or replacements
to be made and the cost of doinq so sha].1 be deducted from
payment to be made to the Contractor.
28. Sonflict of_Interest: Contractor agrees that no member,
officer, or employee of the City shall have any interest,
direct or indirect, in the executed Contract or the proceeds
thereof. Violation of this provision shall cause the
executed contract to be null and void and the Contractor
will forfeit any payments to be made under the executed
Contract.
29. Entire Co�tract: The executed Contract supersedes all oral
agreements, and negotiations between the parties relating to
the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements
presently in effect between the parties'relating to the
subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments,
deletions, or waivers of the provisions of the executed
Contract shall be valid only when expressed in writinq and
duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided
herein. '
30. Contract Conditions: The Contractor shal'l be required to
execute the City's Contract and to fulfill the requirements
contained within it. The bond and certificate of insurance
shall be provided when the Contract is executed.
EXECUTED AS OF THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN:
CITY OF
CONTRACTOR NAME',:
BY• BY:
ITS MAYOR
BY•
ITS CITY MANAGER
ITS
(6)
3.08
AGREEMENT FOii TH]3 CQRB8IDE COLLECTION OF REFIISi3
THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE ON , DAY OF , 1995,
BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY (CITY) AND WALTER�S RECYCLING &
RFFLTSE, CIRCLF, PINE� MINNESOTA,(CONTRACTOR).
WHEREAS, the Contractor is in the business of collecting refuse.
WHEREAS, the City desires the Contractor to collect refuse from
the curbside throughout the City's municipal limits in accordance
with the terms of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree
as follows:
1.
��
Contractor Service Reguirements: The Contractor agrees to
provide CURBSIDE COLLECTION OF REFUSE.
Refuse: is waste which normally results from the operation
of a household including rubbish. Refuse includes useable
carpeting, household furnishinq, household furniture,
electronic and scrap wood. Refuse does not include body
waste, food waste, leaves, grass or other soft bodied garden
waste, construction or remodeling debris resulting from a
contractor, shingles, sheetrock, recyclables, major
appliances, tires, oil, oil filters, fluorescent lamps,
household hazardous waste, and/or any other item prohibited
by State and Federal statute from Solid Waste management
processing facilities.
Collection Vehicle Fg�inment Rp,�uirements: Each collection
vehicle shall be equipped with the following:
a. a two-way radio
b. a first aid kit
c. an approved 2A108C
d. warning fiashers
Dry Chemical Fire Extinguisher
e. warning alarms to indicate movement in reverse
f. signs on the rear of the vehicle which state "This
Vehicle Makes Frequent Stops��
g. a broom and a shovel for cleaning up spills
h. OSHA required rear view mirrors that extend out from
the vehicle a sufficient distance to clearly see and to
safely operate the vehicle in reverse.
All of the required equipment must be in proper working
order.
3.09
A(iREEMENT FOR TH$ CIIR88IDL COLLECTION OF REFIISL
All vehicles must be clean and maintained in proper working
order.
All vehicles must be clearly identified on both sides with
Contractor's name and telephone number.
3. Personnel Reguirements: Contractor shall retain sufficient
personnel and equipment to fulfill the requirements and
specifications of this Agreement.
Contractor's personnel shall:
a. Conduct themselves at all times in a courteous
manner with the general public.
b. Make a concerted effort to have at all times a
presentable appearance.
c. Perform their work in a neat and quiet manner,
clean up all material spilled in collection and
hauling operations.
d. Avoid damage to property.
e. Not perform their duties or operate vehicles while
consuming alcohol or illegally using controlled
substances or while under the influence of alcohol
and/or such substances.
4. Weighing of Refuse and Reporting Rec,�,tirements: Contractor
will keep accurate records consisting of an approved weight
slip with the date, time, collection route, driver's name,
vehicle number, tare weight, gross weight and net weiqht for
each loaded vehicle.
Collection vehicles will be weighed empty before collection
to obtain a tare weight and weighed after completion of
collection. An original of each weight ticket shall be
included as part of the billing sent to the City by
September 30, 1995. Contractor will provide a final report
of the total tons collected.
5. Ownershiti: Ownership of the refuse shall remain with the
persan placing it out for collection until Contractor's
personnel physically touches the refuse for collection, at
which time ownership shall transfer to Contraator.
i2)
3.10
AaRESMENT BOR TH8 CIIRBSIDB COLLECTION OF REF088
-._ •� • ;- -
The City shall notify residents to place their refuse at
curbside before 6 a.m. on Saturday, September 16, 1995, and
separate from other materials placed at the curbside.
7. ProcedLre for Unacce�table Refuse If Contractor determines
that a resident has set out unacceptable materials, the
driver shall use the following procedures:
Curbside:
a) Contractor shall leave the unacceptable
materials.
b) The driver shall record the address on forms
provided by the Contractor and acceptable to the
City and report the addresses to the City at the
end of each collection day.
8. Collection Point: Refuse shall be collected from the
curbside. Refuse shall be collected, managed and disposed
of in accordance with State law.
9. �ollection Hours. Residents will be required to place
refuse at curbside before 6:00 a.m. on September 16, 1995.
Collection shall commence at 6:00 a.m. The Contractor shall
maintain sufficient equipment and personnel to assure that
all collection operations are completed by 6:00 p.m. on
September 16, 1995.
10. Cleanup Responsibilit�y. Contractor shall adequately clean
up any material spilled or blown during the course of
collection and/or hauling operations. AlI collection
vehicles shall be equipped with at least one broom and one
shovel for use in cleaning up material spillage.
1 � .. . ;- -
The proposer shall dispose of the material as per State
Law.
12. Insurance Coveraae. Contractor shall provide a certificate
of insurance as proof of liability coverage or death in the
amount of $600,000 for any one person and in the sum of
1,000,000 for two or more persons for the same occurrence
and for damages to property in the sum of $3,000,000. The
certificate of insurance shall name the City as an
additional insured and state that Contractor coverage shall
be the primary coverage in the event of a Ioss. Fu_rther,
the certificate shall provide for thirty (30) days written
(3)
3.11
AGREEMENT FOR THE CIIRBSIDE COLLECTION OF REFIISE
notice to the City before cancellation, expiration, or
change of coverage.
13. Comnensation for Services: The City will pay $160.00 per
hour for each truck with a two person crew, not to exceed 15
hours, and $54.00 per ton disposal costs. The Contractor
shall provide an invoice detailing per hour truck time and
per ton disposal costs.
14. Method of Pavment: Contractor shall submit an itemized bill
for collection services providsd to the City.
within 15 days after collection has been completed. This
bill shall be paid in the same manner as other claims made
to the City. The Contractor shall submit the documentation
and reports as required under Paragraph Four of this
Agreement, with the invoices. Payment to the Contractor
will not be released unless the required reports are
included with the invoice.
15. Term: means the one month period from September 14, 1995 to
September 19, 1995.
16. IndeAendent Contractor: At all times and for all purposes,
the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an
employee of the City. No statement herein and in the
executed Contract shall be construed so as to find the
Contractor to be an employee of the City.
17. Subcontractor: The Contractor may enter into subcontracts
with refuse haulers licensed in Anoka County for services
provided for under the executed Contract for the services
specified herein. All subcontractors must provide a copy of
their license to operate in the County and a Certificate of
Insurance.
18. Assignment: Neither party shall assign the executed
Contract, nor any interest arising therein, without the
written consent of the other party.
19. Se_rv?�es Not Provided For: No claim for services furnished
by the Contractor not specifically provided for herein shall
be honored by the City.
20. Severabilitv: The provisions of the executed Contract are
severable. If any portion hereof and in the executed
Contract is, for any reason, held by a court of competent
jurisdiction, to be contrary to law, such decision shall not
affect the remaining provisions of the same contract.
21. Com�liance with Laws and Regulations: In providing services
hereunder and in the executed Contract, the Contractor shall
abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations
(4)
3.12
AGREEMENT FOR THE CIIRBSIDE COLLECTION OF REFIIS$
pertaining to the provision of services to be grovided
hereunder. Any violation shall constitute a material breach
of the executed Contract.
22. Equal otiportunity: During the performance of the executed
Contract, the Contractor, in compliance with Executive Order
11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and Department of
Labor regulations 41 CFR Part 60, shall not discriminate
aqainst any emp2oyee or applicant for employment because of
race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The
Contractor shall take affirmative action to insure that
applicants for employment are qualified, and that employees
are treated during employment, without regard to their race,
color, religion, sex, or national origin.
23. Waiver: Any waiver by either party of a breach of any
provisions of the executed Contract shall not affect, in any
respect, the validity of the remainder of the executed
Contract.
24. Indemnification: The Contractor shall indemnify and hold
harmless the City, its employees and agents, for all claims,
damages, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited
to, attorneys' fees, which they may suffer or for which they
may be held liable as a result of the fault of the
Contractor, his employees, or subcontractors in the
performance of the executed Contract.
25. Workers Compensat?on - insurance: The Contractor shall
provide workers compensation insurance covering all
employees of the contractor engaged in the performance of
the executed Contract, in accordance with the Minnesota
Workers' Compensation Law.
26. Performance and Pavment Bond: The Contractor shall execute
and deliver to the City a performance and payment bond with
a corpo=ate surety for 75� of the value of the contract.
The executed Contract shall not become effective until such
a bond in a form acceptable to the City has been delivered
to the City and approved by the City Attorney. The executed
Contract shall be subject to t�rmination by the City at any
time if said bond shall be cancelled or the surety thereon
relieved from liability for any reason. The term of such
performance bond shall be for the life of the executed
Contract. Extensions or renewals shall require the
execution and delivery of a performance bond in the above
amount to cover the period of extension or renewal.
27. Utilities: The Contractor shall be
public and private utilities whether
public or private property. If such
(5)
3.13
obligated to protect all
occupying street or
utilities are damaged
AGREEMENT FOR T8E CIIRB8IDE COLLECTION OF REFIISE
by reason of the Contractor�s operations, under the executed
Contract, he/she shall repair or replace same or, failinq to
do so promptly, the City shall cause repairs or replacements
to be made and the cost of doing so shall be deducted from
payment to be made to the Contractor.
28. Conflict of Interest: Contractor aqrees that no member,
officer, or employee of the City shall have any interest,
direct or indirect, in the executed Contract or the proceeds
thereof. Violation of this provision shall cause the
executed contract to be null and void and the Contractor
will forfeit any payments to be made under the executed
Contract.
29. Entire CoMtract: The executed Contract supersedes all oral
agreement5 and negotiations between the parties relating to
the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements
presently in effect between the parties relating to the
subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments,
deletions, or waivers of the provisions of the executed
Contract shall be valid only when expressed in writing and
duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided
herein.
30. Contract Conditions: The Contractor shall be required to
execute the City's Contract and to fulfill the requirements
contained within it. The bond and certificate of insurance
shall be provided when the Contract is executed.
EXECUTED AS OF THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN:
CITY OF
BY•
ITS MAYOR
BY•
ITS CITY MANAGER
CONTRACTOR NAME:
BY•
ITS
(6)
3.14
I _
�
DAT'E:
TO
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
July 20, 1995
William W. Burns, City Manager �'� �
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott H'ickok, Planning Coordinator
Lisa Campbe�lanning Associate
SUBJECT: Council Action: Consideration of Agreement foc Tree, Branch and Brush Removal
During the week of September l lth through the 15th, 1995, as part of the Fridley Pride Citywide
Clean-up Week, tree branches and brush will be collected from the curbside of all Fridley households.
On June 13th, the City received two valid proposals and one unnotarized proposal for tree, brush and
branch removat. Outside Services and Ceres Envira;imental submitted the two valid proposals, and
their prices are given below:
Item
Clam Truck W/Operator
Haul Truck W/Operator
Two Person Crews
Total Hourly Rate
Ceres
$120/hr.
$ 55/hr.
36/hr.
$21I
Unit Price
Outside Services
$110/hr.
$ 80/hr.
75/hr.
$265
Staffrecommends that Council award the service agreement to Ceres Environmental based on their
tawer per unit and per hour proposal price.
This is a hourly contract. The Contractor will be paid for each hour that each unit of equipment is
used. Truck hours will be monitored by the City in order to avoid abuse by the Contractor. Based
on an estimated participation rate of 70%, staff estimates the cost of this program activity at roughly
$53,000.
4.01
William W. Bums
July 20, 1995
Page 2
Staff has negotiated with Ceres Emiromnental for some equipmern alternatives that may result in cost
savings. If participation is as high as expected, two 30 cubic yard trucks will be replaced with one
100 yard truck at $120 per hour. This will result in some cost savings to the City.
Agreement Features
Under this agreemetrt, collection will begin at 7 a.m. on September l lth and be completed at 3 p.m.
on Friday, September lSth. Collection days run &om 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. each day. Upon arrival and
departure from the City, the trucks will be checking in with a City representative, who will log in
number of trucks and number of loads hauled out of the City. There is a 5% incentive for early
completion and a 10°rb penalty for failure to complete by 3 p.m. on September 15, 1995. A 75%
perFormance bond also guarantees the contractor's work.
StaffRecommendation:
Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to execute the agreement
for tree, branch and brush removal with Ceres Environmental. If you have any questions regarding
this recommendation, please feel free to contact Lisa at extension #594.
LC:da
M-95-416
4.02
ACiREEMENT FOR CIIRBSIDS COLLECTION OF TREE BRANC8E8 AND BRII88 TO
ALL RESIDENTIAL AND MIILTI-UNIT 80IISSHOLDB
THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE ON , DAY OF , 1995
BETWEEN THE CITY OF FRIDLEY (CITY) AND CERES ENVIRONMENTAL, ST.
PAUL� MINNESOTA (CONTRACTOR)
WHEREAS, the Contractor is in the business of collecting and
processing TREE BRANCHES AND BRUSH.
WHEREAS, the City desires the contractor to collect tree branches
and brush from the curbside throughout the City's municipal
limits in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intendinq to be legally bound, agree
as follows:
l. Contractor Service Recruirements: The Contractor agrees to
provide CURBSIDE COLLECTION OF TREE BRANCHES AND BRUSH.
Tree Branches and Brush Include: Tree branches no greater
than 10 feet in length and 4 inches in diameter and brush
trimmings.
r ..- . - � -
a. Remove tree branches no greater than 10 feet in length
and 4 inches in diameter from the curbside;
b. Clean up the collection area;
c. Repair any damage to property done by equipment; and
d. Return to service households not serviced durinq the
initial project period.
3. Collection Vehicle Eg�,li�ment Reql,iirements: Each collection
vehicle shall be equipped with the following:
a. a two-way radio
b. a first aid kit
c. an approved 2AlOBC Dry Chemical Fire Extinguisher
d. warning flashers
e. warning alarms to indicate movement in reverse
f. signs on the rear of the vehicle which state "This
Vehicle Makes Frequent Stops"
g. a broom and a shovel for cleaning up spills
1
4.03
AGREEMFNT BOR CIIRBSIDE COLLECTION OF TREL BRANCHES AND BRUBH TO
ALL RESIDENTIAL AND MIILTI-IINIT HOII88IiOLDB
h. OSHA required rear view mirrors that extend out from
the vehicle�a sufficient distance to clearly see and to
safely operate the vehicle in reverse.
All of the required equipment must be in proper working
order.
All vehicles must be maintained in proper working order and
be clean.
All vehicles must be clearly identified on both sides with
Contractor's name and telephone number.
4. Personnel Reguirements: Contractor shall retain sufficient
personnel and equipment to fulfill the requirements and
specifications of this Agreement.
Contractor's personnel shall:
a. Conduct themselves at all times in a courteous manner
with the general public.
b. Make a concerted effort to have at all times a
presentable appearance.
c. Perform their work in a neat and quiet manner, clean up
all material spilled in collection and hauling
operations.
d. Avoid damage to property.
e. Not perform their duties or operate vehicles while
consuming alcohol or illegally using controlled
substances or while under the influence of alcohol
and/or such substances.
5. Beporting Reguirements: Contractor will provide a final
report of the total cubic yards collected, number of units
of each equipment used, and the hours each unit was used.
6. Owaershi� Ownership of the tree branches and brush shall
remain with the person placing it out for collection until
Contractor's personnel physically touches the material for
collection, at which time ownership shall transfer to
Contractor.
E
4.04
At�REEMENT FOR CIIRSSIDS COLLECTION OF TREE BRANC$ES AND BRII88 TO
ALL RESIDENTIAL AND MIILTI-IINIT HOIISEHOLDS
-._ .� . -- � �- �• K �
The City shal], notify residents to place their tree branches
and brush at curbside before 7 a.m. on September 11, 1995.
8. procedLre for Unacce8table Tree Branches and Brush: If
Contractor determines that a resident has set out
unacceptable materials, the driver shall use the following
procedures:
Curbside:
a) Contractor shall leave the unacceptable
materials.
b) The driver shall record the address on forms
provided by the Contractor and acceptable to the
City and report the addresses to the City at the
end of each collection day.
9. Collection Point: Tree branches and brush shall be
collected from the curbside.
10. Collection Hours. Residents will be required to place tree
branches and brush at curbside before 7:00 a.m. on
September 11, 1995. Collection shall commence at 7:00 a.m.
and end at 3:00 p.m. each day. The Contractor shall maintain
sufficient equipment and personnel to assure that all
collection operations are completed by 3:00 p.m. on
September 15, 1995.
I1. Cleanua Res.�onsibilitg. Contractor shall adequately clean
up any material spilled or blown during the course of
collection and/or hauling operations. All collection
vehicles shall be equipped with at least one broom, one
shovel and other equipment needed for use in cleaning up
after collection.
I2. Incentives:
District-wide Collection Completed By 3:0o p.m. on September
15, 1995
5� of contract value will be added to the contractor's final
payment.
Failure to Complete Collection by 3:00 p.m. on Beptember 15,
1995
3
4.05
AGREEMENT FOR CIIRBSIDS COLLECTION OF TREB BRANCHES AND BRII88 TO
ALL RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI-IINIT HOIISEHOLDS
10� of contract value will be deducted from the contractor's
final payment.
� .. . -- � �- �• +� �
The Contractor shall dispose at a location outside of the
City and in accordance with State law.
14. Insurance Coverage. Contractor shall provide a certificate
of insurance as proof of liability coverage or death in the
amount of $300,000 for any one person and in the sum of
$600,000 for two or mare persons for the same occurrence and
for damages to property in the sum of $300,000. The
certificate of insurance shall name the City as an
additional' insured and state that Contractor coverage shall
be the primary coverage in the event of a loss. Further,
the certificate shall provide for thirty (30) days written
notice to the City before cancellation, expiration, or
change of coverage.
15. S,omAensati�n for Services. The City shall pay the
Contractor in accordance with Exhibit A of this Agreement.
The Contractor shall provide an invoice detailing hours each
unit of equipment was used durng the project period.
16. Method of Pa,y.�pent: Contractor shall submit an itemized bill
for collection services provided to the City within 15 days
after collection has been completed. This bill shall be
paid in the same manner as other claims made to the City.
The Contractor shall submit the documentation and reports as
required under Paragraph Five of these specifications, with
the invoices. Payment to the Contractor will not be
released unless the required reports are included in the
invoice.
17. Term: means the period from September 6, 1995 to September
20, 1995.
18. I�de�endent Contractor: At all times and for all purposes,
the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an
employee of the City. No statement herein and in the
executed Contract shall be construed so as to find the
Contractor to be an employee af the City.
19. Subcontractor: The Contractor may enter into subcontracts
with other tree removal companies licensed in the City of
Fridley. For the purposes of this contract, the City waives
all license fees. However, each Contractor and all
4
4.06
AaREEMLNT FOR CIIRBBIDB COLLSCTION OF TREE BRANCHES AND BRII88 TO
ALL RFSIDENTIAL AND MIILTI-IINIT 80IISE80LD8
subcontractors must provide a Certificate of Insurance with
the license application.
20. Assianment: Neither party shall assign the executed
Contract, nor any interest arising therein, without the
written consent of the other party.
21. Services Not Provided For: No claim for services furnished
by the Contractor not specifically provided for herein shall
be honored by the City.
22. Severabilitv: The provisions of the executed Contract are
severable. If any portion hereof and in the executed
Contract is, for any reason, held by a court of competent
jurisdiction, to be contrary to law, such decision shall not
affect the remaining provisions of the same contract.
23. Comnliance with Laws and Regulations: In providing services
hereunder and in the executed Contract, the Contractor shall
abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations
pertaining to the provision of services to be provided
hereunder. Any violation shall constitute a material breach
of the executed Contract.
24. Equal O�nortunitv: During the performance of the executed
Contract, the Contractor, in compliance with Executive Order
11246, as amended by Executive Order 11375 and Department of
Labor regulations 41 CFR Part 60, shall not discriminate
against any employee or applicant for employment because of
race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The
Contractor shall take affirmative action to insure that
app2icants for employment are qualified, and that employees
are treated during employment, without regard to their race,
color, religion, sex, or national origin.
25. Waiver: Any waiver by either party of a breach of any
provisions of the executed Contract shall not affect, in any
respect, the validity of the remainder of the executed
Contract.
26. Indemnification: The Contractor shall indemnify and hold
harmless the City, its employees and agents, for all claims,
damages, losses, and expenses, including, but not limited
to, attorneys' fees, which they may suffer or for which they
may be held liable as a result of the fault of the
Contractor, his employees, or subcontractors in the
performance of the executed Contract.
5
4.07
AGREBMENT FOR CIIRBSIDE COLLECTION OF TREE BRANC8E8 AND BRII88 TO
ALL RESIDENTIAL AND MIILTI-tJNIT HOIISEHOLDS
27. Workers ComAensation - Insurance: The Contractor shall
provide workers compensation insurance covering all
employees of the contractor engaged in the performance of
the executed Contract, in accordance with the Minnesota
Workers' Compensation Law.
28. Performance and Pavment Bond: The Contractor shall execute
and deliver to the City a performaace and payment bond with
a corporate suretp for 75�5 of the value of the contract.
The executed Contract shall not become effective until such
a bond in a form acceptable to the City has been delivered
to the City and approved by the City Attorney. The executed
Contract shall be subject to termination by the City at any
time if said bond shall be cancelled or the surety thereon
relieved from liability for any reason. The term of such
performance bond shall be for the life of the executed
Contract. Extensions or renewals shall require the
execution and delivery of a performance bond in the above
amount to cover the period of extension or renewal.
29. Utilities: The Contractor shall be obligated to protect all
public and private utilities whether occupying street or
public or private property. If such utilities are damaged
by reason of the Contractor's operations, under the executed
Contract, he/she shall repair or replace same or, failing to
do so promptly, the City shall cause repairs or replacements
to be made and the cost of doing so shall be deducted from
payment to be made to the Contractor.
30. Conflict of Interest: Contractor agrees that no member,
officer, or employee of the City shall have any interest,
direct or indirect, in the executed Contract or the proceeds
thereof. Violation of this provision shall cause the
executed to be null and void anci the Contractor will forfeit
any payments to be made under the executed Contract.
31. Entire Contract: The executed Contract supersedes all oral
aqreements and negotiations between the parties relating to
the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements
presently in effect between the parties relating to the
subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments,
deletions, or waivers of the provisions of the executed
Contract shall be valid only when expressed in writing and
duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided
herein.
32. Contract Conditions: The Contractor
execute the City's Contract and to
contained within it. The bond and
shall be provided when the Contract
6
4.08
shall be required to
fulfill the requirements
certificate of insurance
is executed.
EXECUTED AS OF THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN:
CITY OF , CONTRACTOR NAME:
BY: BY:
ITS MAYOR ITS
BY:
ITS CITY MANAGER
7
4.09
Agreement For Tree Brus6 and Branch Removal
Item
Clam Truck with Operator
Haul Truck with Operator*
Two Person Clean-Up Crew
*30 cuhic yard trucks
100 Yard Walking Floor Trucks
Swing Loader
$120/hour
$ 55/hour
$ 36/hour
$120/hour
$ 50/hour
4.10
Eahibit A
Not to Exceed
Six Units
Nme Units
Three Units
_> Replaces two 30 cubic yard haul trucks
=>Replaces �ne Clam truck with Operator
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
WILLIAM W. BURNS, CITY MANAGER���
RICHARD D. PRIBYL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
LEASE ON HOLLY CENTER RETAIL SPACE
July 21, 1995
A proposed lease for the Liquor Warehouse temporary location in the Holly Center has
been prepared for Council's approval. This lease has been reviewed by the City Attorney's
Office. The Iease provides the following:
Location: 6538 University Ave NE
Term of Lease: August 1, 1995 to February 29, 1996
Monthly Lease Cost:
Rent Per Month $2,95Q.OQ
Common Area Maintenance $420.Q0
Insurance $130.00
Rea1 Estate Taxes 135Q.00
4 850.00
Staff is recommending that Council approve this lease through a motion as a temporary site
for the Fridley Liquor Warehouse.
RDP/me
Attachment
a.
5.01
En9mernng
S�wer
YJ;�ICr
��lfi(S
S�1Le'�S
:��1/1I(;(1�11(;l
�LI.�I���I'' -�\I1�� ��I
TO: William W. Bums, City Manaqer ��Y' PW9�-190
FROM: John G. Flor Public Wotks Director
DATE: July 24, 1995
SUBJECT: East River Road Bike Path
The City with Anoka County Park Department, has proposed to construct a bike path from Mississippi
to Osbome Road as part of the Great River Road Bikeway system As you may recall, when the Rnoka
County Highway Department initiated the improvement of East River Road betWeen Hartman Ciucle
and Glen Creek Road, the City requested the inclusion of a bike path on the east side of East River
Road in that project.
Forest Lake Contracting is the Iow bidder for the Anoka County Hiqhway Department East Rivez Road
improvement project. The County cannot extend their conttact beyond the limits approved by the
Federal Highway Administration, thezefore, it is necessary for the City to implement a separate
contract for the bikeway extension.
The Anoka County Parks Department has prepared the plans and obtained esiimates for tlus
improvement. The estimated cost is below $25,000. Formal advertisement of bids is not necessary.
As the County has determined that Forest Lake was the low bidder for the East River Road
improvement, it would be appropriate for the City to initiate a sepaxate contract with Forest Lake
Contracting for the bikeway extensions utilizing the County prices for this work. This would also
facilitate the coordination and timely construction of the bike path, as Forest Lake can accomplish
this additional work directly into theit construction schedule.
Since Forest Lake is now curxently workinq in this area and the preliminary plans have been
prepared by the Anoka County Parks Department, it is suggested thai a separate contract be prepazed
and the contractor be authorized to continue the construction of the bike path in conjunction with the
East River Road improvement. If necessary, any adjustments to the unit quantities can be made when
the work has been completed
Recommend the City Council authorize a contract with Forest Lake Contzacting for the addition of a
bike path north and south of the East River Road County Highway improvement (Glen Creek Road
to Osborne Road and Hartman Circle to Rice Creek Way).
The contract will be provided to the City Council for award after the State Aid Office has approved the
plans.
JGF:cz
6.01
I��
[�!'._��
, c /i ' '
� � ��
�/ . \`
, � ;
\ :.,
, ��'
a
a
J
X
O,
0
�
m
,
,
!
II
�
0
I
�
_ �/ \\
C� -�- \
� \
o ro.o
.�� ��� �
�r .. �, s, �-�- „= r
■�fl • ryJY�1�4 �� 1 � � �///���
SI�(iOM �
� TM
�
����Y`
�►
�EK
K ��
O�'E •�r R
O�'Y` ,,`"
�
r .J � � �
l�
- G ' �
11 � �. — . �'! � J�ll�'
\_`: � '•. 1 `_J' ✓`
�� �� �
�,;� f ,�.a ,, ,
\� `` � ;_ ;
� /
`� \, , ; � , _ .
o�. ; � =
; �� --,- ; - "' — _ =
, � { -
: � � •--
. ( : �
�' 7b00 ' _
.1\ -- -- rs rh �v['+ut o�.ct t
- `� F . �uiwte
'O:tpffK �HVR�h
I
� � � �
\�� �! I i�!M �V(A{R •L
'� ' .
1 .
1 � V
A
� � tl 1 Q 1 » >
u t , w
B1KE�/AY EXTENSION ` ` �
0
z n
��� 1 i '
1�
. �� ' ( 4 I4I
-� �o .�� t 1 IU �:.s s�
�`i.,{i, SG�
1
LO 4N
PORK ✓ � �
tiI
�..f�• •��w�t
C�u• LACMfI[a
p��� 4[U'll1 nI I
..�„�.
; NC�I
a �
i
�
=�v
� �• '
\
,�,.
,
>>
.�
Y
�VTw
� 4 s �:
i` – � � '/"
V V
Q y ' � W W � M�p{NGU
� � _ ��
�I� � `
rr � :
� �.Ir� f � o o � � �. :�`._r
�Ir(�f �v[ z u vl � �,
__� . .� � � � , ��wtE�
; �,
� . o
� i � COMYERCE C7f. 5.
_—,� � � 7100 �
�._ •
�_`,~' �- 1 ,, ..
I; I��''' •� � CJ J ou�vir
o � � � �,:} ^ � ,. •, . _J ^ 1 r. n
a , , J r, � � r��nr•
1 toT
� � � �RiDICr. � ��
i I : � COM►.UNIT�� � � •
PARK.�.:1 -r ,:' �i �
�Ot� ��r ^ . I F- � . '�` „� E� •
--�� �o � ��t��. ' `�,. _ �
I _ •� � _ j ,;�� ,,`� �
COUNTY PROJECT �'�; ;�� j `
- - � �— �, . y!
��i
� \\ � I � �� l � > (.�,}.
, � �r�� _� , L
�. • . l� � : ,o . _�,. ' --,- �
�.• ' � g�;e �� �� iw �rc
ur il �
E
w `t
. i i � ( 75 �`� ,
� ��� �*o
U �.`� W
- � �� •
.�„r vP I� � ;�. o �
� � Pl4(G
') � VARK
_ j �• . (
�J f 1 + � � �/ ( `�
� � � � . �.1� y, ' �� ! �
� Q � _ O L�H:KE L E ( I `_,.'���.��-�
PARK .li �� - ��
, � ��' � BIKEWAY EXTENSION
_ , ., �'
:� ��.-
"Ki ta `, �\� I I
. .�, t� ��
�\�� � � . I I _
� „� ;� , � I.
' :oatr�rCn a�q��c.v� �
^ , r.��x�
\ // �-- � �----.. ' /i
\` � \ '�, \ t r' .s ! � I i Y -
� �
� a..
t.7 �
R' �
� 4 ^
�
�I
__.��— '
En9�neenng
Se wer
Waier
iPdrks
�S��eels
�.1��n!�ndnc�
TO: William W. Bums, City Manager,� � PW95-193
FROM: ohn G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
Clyde V. Moravetz, Engineering Assistant
DATE: July 24, 1995
SUBJECT: Resolution Requesting Off System State Aid Funds for Osbome Road
Bike Path
The City has been working with Anoka County for certain improvements to Osbome Road
between Commerce Lane and Sth Street. The improvements include milling, bituminous
overlay, turn lanes, signal revisions and bituminous pathway.
The bituminous pathway is to parallel Osbome Road on the north side and run between
Commerce Lane and Trunk Highway 4? (University Avenue). This segment will complete
the bikeway/walkway system of Osbome Road from East River Road to Old Central.
Request the City Council approve the resolution authorizing State Aid funds to defray City
costs for the 8 foot bituminous path on Osbome Road
cz
Attachment
7.01
��
. i, .,
... . :
I�80IATI�1 ZD. - 1995
itE80I�T1'I�T A�IBII� I►�IICIP1siL S'II�TS AZD FI�IDB Rn
QO�TI'Y STAi'S AID ffit��lY (C8AS) QBBO� I�QlD - O�
I� Z�0 5'1'H STR�1' (BAP 02-608-08j (�P 127-020-16j
�i8, it has been de�cl advisable ar�d rieoessaty for Aridca �ty tA make
vertain iu�rw�ments to Osborne Rpad between C�aeroe Lane and 5th Street
irrcludir�g millir�g, bit�ainous werlay, turn lane and signal revisioa�s ar�d
a bitwnuxws pathway, ar�d
WI�RE�iB, said constzuction project is beiryg suL�Cnitted to the Minryesota
Depar�t of ZYanspo�rtation S'tate Aid Offioe ar�d identified in its records
as SAP 02-608-08 ar�ci 1�SAP 127-020-16. �
NO�i, T�+ORE,, BE IT I2�OLVED THPiT, the City �il of the City of
Fridley, Amka C�amty, Mi.nne_sota, that an apprapriation frcan the Municipal
State Aid Ftinds in the amaant of $15, 000 be mad�e to apply to the
�LStnictiori of said proj ect ar�d rec�est the Canrtaissi�er of the Mirmesat-a
Department of 1'ransportatiaaz to apprave this appropriatioaz.
=a:�. �� �• • ��� �:ti� s� �r�, wr .i- r:r a� •�� •�.� � r:� ; �: .,.
• 1
A'!'1'F.'.S'r:
WILI�AM A. C�IAMPA - CITY CLII2K
7.02
WILZIAM J. NEE - 1�YOR
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Eng�neennc,
5�wt'r
W,�ICr
ParkS
SUeets
Ma�n!endncc
William W. Burns, City Manager ,� m�
� John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
,�� Clyde V. Moravetz, Engineering Assistant
July 24, I995
PW9S-194
Request fzom Anoka County to Post �No Parking" signs on Osbome Road
between Commerce Lane and Sth Street
The above segment of road is to be improved by Anoka County. The proposed lane
configurations and geometrics of Osbome Road does not include a roadway shoulder.
The required number of lanes to accommodate tuming lane requirements eliminates any
possibility for parking widths on either side of Osbome Road within this segment.
Therefore, Anoka County requests a`no parking' resolution from the City of Fridley. The
signs would be posted and maintained by the County.
Recommend Council approve the resolution to post `no parking' signs on Osbome Road
between Commerce Lane and Sth Street.
cz
Attachment
8.01
iJ
.�, ..
:.-. �
RE80I�1'I�i �U. - 1995
I=�:,�, i fl •�, -1�� Il;r: � c �:�: •�: �, � •r • •�'�� r C� •�
•�_I:�i'1 t: '.�1- � :1' ,��:tl:ti •i � 1:�1•.M: 1: i� �: �� y'I:ri"
W�,S, the City of Fridley and Uo�uity of At� have plaru�ed c�eztain
in�ravecoents of Osborne Rflad fraa Oamnerce Iane to 5th Sir.re�t, ar�d
W�S, the City will be experyding City Off-�n State Aid F1u�ds on this
street imprwe�erYt proj ect, and
�AS, this i�rave�ment d�oes not provicle adequate width for parkir�q an bo�th
sicles of the street, app�aval of the prq�osed oo�stYUCtio�n as a City ar�d Camty
State Aid Stz�et proj ect n��t t;hex�efore be co�clitioned upati oertain parkiriq
restrictions, ar�d
�8, ti� extexit of thec.�e restrictica�s that wrx�ld be a necessatiy prerequisite
t,o the approcral of this vonstsuction as a City and C�ty State Aid proj ect has
been determi�ed.
NaW, �, BE IT RE9�I,VED by the City Ca.uzcil of the City of Fridley that
the oau7ty is h�x�eby authorized to post "No Parkit�g" sigr�s � bo�t�h sides of the
abvve street between � Iane ar�d 5th Street upati ocetq�letion of th�e
it�ravements scheduled for this roadway se�xYt.
P�1SSID AI�ID ADOF!'ID HY T� CTTY aDiAV�'II, OF Ti� CITY OF FRIDI�Y 'l3�8 24'i� L1AY OF
JULY, 1995.
fVYY�i�
WILL�IAM A. C��A - CITY CLF..RK
WILI�AM J. NEE - MAYOR
8.�2
�
�
CfTY OF
PRIDLEY
ELECTRICAL
Robbinsdale Electric Co
3754 West Broadway
Robbinsdale MN 55422
GAS SERVICES
Care Air Cond & Hea,ting
1211 Old Hwy 8
New Brighton MN 55112
LICENSES
JULY 24, 1995
Burt Wolslayer
Leo Lindig
Peterson & Pinney Inc
4151 Coon Rapids Blvd
Coon Rapids MN 55433-2525 Ray Turnquist
GENERAI. CONTRACTOR-COMMERCIAL
Chub's Roofing
1549 103 Ave NW
Coon Rapids MN 55433 George Dilley
Greiner Construction
222S9St
Minneapolis MN 55402 Todd Hayes
GENER.AL GONTRACTQR-RESIDENTLA
A-Line Construction (20032753)
637 E River Rd #116
Anoka MN 55303 Rod Engebretson
All Systems Roofmg (8963)
2340 Charles Dr
St Paul MN 55114 Tom Edwards
Felix Construction (8262} .
4410 379 St
North Branch MN 55056 Paul Felix
10.02
STATE OF MINN
JOHN PALACIO
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Same
JOHN PALACIO
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Same
STATE OF MINN
Same
Same
Hastings Richard Co (4051)
6331 Riverview Ter NE
Fridley MN 55432
Inside & Out Remodelers (3281)
5920 Wolfberry La
Golden Valley MN 55422
Lee Steven R. Co (5758)
9465 Irving Ave N
Brookiyn Park MN 55444
Quinzon Fred Construction Co (8226)
2605 Siark St
Little Canada MN 55117
Shingle Creek Construction (20030639)
5109 Baker Rd
Minnetonka Mn 55343
Suburban Roofing (20d389'19)
134I8 Crooked Lake Blvd
Andover MN 55304
Thompson Kevin Homes Inc (4209)
PO Box 794
Wayzata MN 55391-0794
Twin City Townhomes Inc (8269)
1250 East Moore Lake Dr NE
Fridley MN 55432
Westem Remodelers (EXEMPT)
2520 W Larpenteur Ave
St Paul MN 55113
HEATING
Anderson Heating & AC
4347 Central Ave NE
Columbia Heights MN 55421-2925
Care Air Cond & Heating
1211 Old Hwy 8
New Brighton MN 55112
R.ichard Hastings
Mark Benzell
Steve Lee
Fred Quinzon
T� Ry�
Joe Domiano
Kevin Thompson
Gene Sheilerud
Sheldon Goldman
Ray Anderson
Leo Lindig
10.03
Same
Same
Sa.me
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
Same
JOHN PALACIO
Chief Bldg Ofcl
Same
Lazson Mechanical
1509 Coon Rapids Blvd NW
Coon Rapids MN 55433
Peterson & Pinney
4151 Coon Rapids Blvd NW
Coon Rapids MN 55433
MOBILE HOME INSTALLER
Mohile Movers
525 105 Ln NW
Cooa Rapids MN 55448
Rapid Mobile Home Service
1288 107 Ave NW .
Coon Rapids MN 55433
PLUMBING
A-Aaron's
2511 Hwy 7
Excelsior MN 55331
Central Plumbing
5700 Girard Ave N
Brooklyn Center MN 55430
JLB Plumbing
2407 Washington St NE
Minneapois MN 55418
SIGN ERECTOR
Sign Language
b237 University Ave NE
Fridley MN 55432
Richard Larson
Larry Turnquist
Don Feltenstein
Jesse Fleck
Jeny Bergstrom
David Green
Jim Bjorlin
7im Golden
10.04
Same
Same
STATE OF MINN
Same
STATE OF MINN
Same
Same
JOHN PALACIO
Chief Bldg Qfcl
CITY OF
����
Newquist & Ekstrum, Chartered
301 Fridley Plaza Office Building
6401 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, MN 55432
ESTIMATES
JULY 24, 1995
Services Rendered as City Prosecuting
Attorney for the Month of June, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 13,271.25
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
400 Northtown Financial Plaza
200 Coon Rapids Boulevard
Coon Rapids, MN 55435-5489
Services Rendered as City Attorney
for the Month of June, 1995 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,749.90
F.F. Jedlicki, Inc.
14203 West 62nd Street
Eden Prairie, MN 55346
Clover Pond Diversion/52nd Avenue
Floodway Project No. 222
Estimate No. 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,084.25
11.01
DESCRIPTION OF RE�UEST:
Rottlund Homes is proposing to replat the property located at the southwest comer of
University Avenue and Mississippi Street. Rottlund Homes has revised the site plan, which
we are calling Rottlund "Plan B Revised", to contain 48 units of senior condominiums, 24 finro-
story single family units, 26 one-story single family units, and 6 eight-unit buildings.
The preliminary plat has not been revised because the City Council must resolve the
condominium issue and other issues pertaining to the site design.
The plat creates lots around each condominium building and a lot for each of the
townhomes. The public right-of-way necessary for the 3rd Street extension is also created.
A 50 foot right-of-way is proposed north of Satellite Lane, but as the road approaches
Mississippi Street, it widens to 70 feet at its widest poirrt. Outlots are created around the
public/private plaza area, and the proposed ponds.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
The developer will need to record appropriate utility easements, a public access easemerrt
over the public/private plaza area and bikeway walkway areas, and the condominium
documerrts will also need to be recorded. It is also recommended that an e�asemerrt be
recorded in the northeast part of the plat to provide the City with the ability to consider and
constrvct an overpass (pedestrian bridge) or underpass to provide a connection across
Mississippi Street. Park fees are also discussed.
PLANNING COMMtSStON ACTtON:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the plat to the City Council subject to
the stipulations as contained in the attached report.
RECOMMENDATION:
Because the site design has not been finalized, the plat will need to be amended according
to the City CounciPs direction. The h�ring should be tabled to August 14, 1995.
Plat Request, P.S. #95-01
Rottlund Homes, inc.
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT SITE ANALYSIS
Proposed Plat
The plat will create the required lots for the condominium and townhome units. The plat also dedicates
a 50 foot right-of-way for 3rd Street for a connection between Satellite Lane and Mississippi Street.
The remaining streets and roadways in the development are private and are to be mair�tained by the
homeowners association.
According to state law, a condominium declaration must be recorded which provides for the operation
and conduct of the homeowners association.
Water and Sewer
The developer has complied with the requirements of the Engineering Department regarding the water
and sewer line. Two key issues were addressed.
The first issue was to provide for a water and sewer line connection from 3rd Street east into the
existing services in University Avenue. The Engineering Department is requesting a 30 foot easement
in this area if these finro lines are located immediately adjacent to one another.
Secondly, a looped water main is required at the extreme southwest comer of the plat from Kasota
Court into the water line in Satellite Lane.
Fire hydrants shall be installed according to Dick Larsvn's memo dated March 21, 1995. Revised
utility plans shall be prepared and reviewed prior to Council action on the plat.
Storm Sewer
The developer is revising the plan in accordance with the direction from the Engineering Department.
More of the run-off will be directed toward the northeast part of the site, and the southwest portion
of the site will be directed to a storm sewer which will outlet onto Satellite Lane.
The City of Fridley HRA has agreed to install a storm sewer pipe along Jupiter Drive and Mercury
Drive to connect into the pipe that is proposed to outlet at the intersection of Satellite Lane and
Jupiter Drive. The developer is also considering another smaU pond just north of Satellite Lane in
between 2 one-story units.
A Rice Creek Watershed District permit will be required. The MPCA also requires a permit if grading
is to be conducted on property over 5 acres in size. The purpose of the MCPA permit is to ensure
proper inspection and erosion control during construction.
A storm water pond maintenance agreemerrt must be executed by the developer and recorded against
the property. The homeowners association will be required to mair�tain the pond and storm water
facilities. The develope�'s attomey has submitted a memorandum objecting to this requiremerrt. Staff
will address this issue with the developer prior to august 14, 1995.
12.02
Plat Request, P.S. #95-01
Rottlund Homes, Inc.
Page 3
Revised calculations and grading and drainage plans must be prepared and revie�nred prior tio Council
action on the plat.
Condominium Documents
The condominium documerrts must dictate that the homeowners association is responsibte for the on-
going mairrter�ar�ce and repair of the water and sewer lines, storm sew� facil'�ties, and private drives
and roadways. It is also suggested that if, in the future, the homeowne�s association does not repair
or maintain these facilities, that the City be permitted, after appropriate notification, to access the
property, repair or repiace the facilities and assess the homeowners association for the cost to
complete the work.
The condominium declaration shal( also dictate what sides of the private driveways are to be posted
as "No Parking" in accordance with Fire Department regulations.
The declaration should also authorize the Public Works Department to flush the hydrants in accordance
with City policies.
The association shall be responsible for plowing, and shall permit emergency vehicle access on the
property.
The association must also be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaping, fencing, entry
monuments, the public/private plaza area, trail system, and light standards.
A concem was raised about the ability of these units to be rented in the future. Although all owners
of property have the right to rent the unit or building in compliance with applicable laws and statutes,
the City has experienced problems with speculators buying a number of units and renting them. In
order to address this issue, it is suggested that the condominium dec(aration prohibit ownership of
two or more units by the same person. In that way, it would prevent speculative ownership of the
buildings.
Access Through the Development
The Fire Department has requested that an all weather surface road for emergency vehicle use be
provided through. the property. The developer is reluctarrt to provide this access. It is recommended
that the existing temporary 3rd Street be left intact as long as possible, and that it be used for
temporary access through the development. Some type of surface, however, must be maintained
through the development during construction.
Park and Recreation Fees
The developer has requested 100% credit of the Park & Recreation fees since the public/private plaza
is proposed to be constructed by the developer, as well as the bikeway walkway b'ail around the
pond/water amenities in the development The fee for each of the units is $750. (f the fees were
imposed, a total of $109,500 wouid be required.
12.03
Plat Request, P.S. #95-01
Rottiund Homes, Inc.
Page 4
Staff recommends that 50°� of the park fees be waived given that the develop� is installing the
improvements and maintaining them. The cost to the developer is at least $65,000 ($20,000 for trails
and $45,000 for the plaza).
Because the public/private plaza is located in the Center City area, it is recommended that a public
acce.ss easement be recorded over this part of the plat as well as over the bikeway walkway through
the center of the development Given that this area is in the Center City area and v+ri{t be utilized by
more than just the occupants of this development, consideration should be given to some type of
reduc�tion in the park fees. The exact amount should be reviewed by tr�e Park & Recreation
Commission with approva! by the City Counc�L
Future Pedestrian/Over/Underpass
An easement shall be retained over the northeast part of the site for future construction of an
over/underpass across Mississippi Street. An area 260 feet along Mississippi Street and 150 feet deep
is recommended. University Avenue will be a major transit corridor, with LRT lines or a busway lane.
A system of pedestrian co�necctions over/under Mississippi Street/University Avenue should not be rufed
out at this point in time. The Design Guidelines also encouraged this approach.
RECOMMENDAT{ON
The Planning Commission recommended approval of PS #95-01 to the City Council with the following
stipulations:
1. The petitioner shall enter into and record against the property a development agreement
with the City. The development agreemerrt shall include, and the petitioner shall comply
with the following stipulations:
a. Construction of 3rd Street and utilities in accordance with the City of Fridley
Engineering standards and specifications.
b. The developer shall submit a performance or subdivision bond in the amount of
125% of the improvement cost to ensure proper installation of the street and
public utilities.
c. Petitioner shall obtain a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to
issuance of the building permit. Petitioner sha11 compfy with the requirements of
the district permit.
d. The petitioner shall obtain the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency permit for storm
water management prior to grading on the property. the petitioner shall comply
with the requirements of the MCPA permit.
12.04
Plat Request, P.S. #95-0�
Rottlund Homes, Inc.
Page 5
e. The grading plan shali be amended and c�lc��lations submitted to comply with
the requiremerrts of the Engineering Department, based on the r�ised plan as
recommended by the Planning Commission ar�d the City Council. Grading plan
and calculations shall be submitted to staff K�rior to final approval by the City
Council.
f. The petitioner shall pay the park dedication fee.s as required by the Paric &
Recreation Commission, and approved by the City Council.
g. Utility lines shall be designed according to the City of Fridley's engineering
standards and requirements. The C'rry shall insF►ect the construction of the utilities.
A plan and profile drawing of the sanitary :�ewer and water mains shall be
submitted.
2. Rottlund Homes shall record a condominium declarati��n in compliance with state statute
515A. The declaration shall include, and the petitior�er shall comply with the following
stipu(ations:
a. The association shall be responsible for the plowing mairrtenance and repair of
the private driveways and streets. The deciaration shall permit emergency vehicle
access.
b. The private streets shall be signed "No Parking" as required by the Fire
Departmerrt.
c. The association shall be responsible for the o�eration, mairrtenance and repair of
the storm water system, and shall execute a:�torm water pond agreement The
pond agreement shall be recorded against thEa property.
d. The association sha!! authorize the Public Works Departmerrt to flush the hydrants
in accordance with City policies.
e. The Association shall be responsible for tt�e maintenance and/or repair of
landscaping entrance monuments and buffer treatrnents.
f, The condominium declara�on shall include the final plan of the project as
approved by the City Council. The declaration shall comply with the requirements
of Minnesota Statute Chapter 515A.
g. The condominium declaration shall require the association to repair and maintain
private utilities.
h. If the association does not mair�tain the drivew��ys, streets and utilities after proper
notification by the City of Fridley, the declaration shall permit the City of Fridley
to access the property, complete the repairs and assess the cost of the property
against the association.
12.05
Plat Request, P.S. #95-01
Rottlund Homes, Inc.
Page 6
i. The condominium declaration shali include language preventing owners from
owning more than two units in the developmerrt and rent them to the extent
permitted by law.
3. The pe�tififioner shall provide a 30 foot utility easement over the water and sewer line
running east west between 3rd Street and University Av�ue.
4. The p�titioner shall record a bikeway waikway easemerrt over the public/private plaza
area and the bituminous trail through the center of the site.
5. M easement shafi be recorded in the northe�ast comer of the plat which provides the
City of Fridley access and the ability to construct an underpass or overpass across
Mississippi Street in the future.
6. Ten foot drainage and utility easemer�ts shall be identified on the plat along the
perimeter of the project.
12.06
�
Q O
N �.,_. � ,��;. _�� .� ��..__ Cl�
,w�, �`„ ...�.^-� � .r+e�a�n.rsn„
Q � ro� ��� �� �.»� n.",b." '. �
�,,,,w�, � !l� '�� '�nvarw awnuou +��011 �
J .,� � i� � .aor�w 31`d93NOlS �'_
�. ��
a �� z --
W �
H I
1
Q �
>
.� oc �=
�
a �
` ,x .eazc
� I
t
�� �
J '
m �
�
,.. ,
� ::'
:�
a ._: �
O
�
�
W �
W N
� W
� �
� W
� �
� O
i�- �
;
,� ,
i i Ii e
..
I � � ,7
.1= -�
i �� �
I �� � �
I ' � ,
I d �
4 .__ .��
I "M .f0i
�
�
�
O
�
O
�
�
.. . . .. . . .: : 0 �J F-
... .,M .6�.L400 � __ � a �
ari � n» � ��
`
�
,. �
.. � ;
� ,
�. �
.. �
.. O J
�
_W_
Z
J
a
�
�
�
�
J
W
�
a
�h � ?i : " ' ' _i! :1=F� _ F .
� a ^eva := _ �o!.�. -?:__ 'L5e , - , -
N z�.. 5� ? g: i:cg �,r.i b.:.§-� : r
"Se�E 'rrt � ;=gi,�� _:-_^ ':�z•i, ;�
5;;; •e° �� 5liv�i3 �i- 3 i ��i_ ,
t3; c�l �; "1CF�l� n� = r:�i'y a a �
� j °;� 3� tij= �i. _� � � � ..
a3:` 3i: :� �i�_i: ?arit �3�rr: ?� 3� 3� ,
W " ;�a� p ?_ .:aj��j: =Pi�j. i�is°3= s� i'q '; �
' �� =;13- ez� �i -:j��?:: -0�-�3 :�i��.� �,i zi =i
�n ' :;;z� ;ac :? ;:q�c�f_ iz.ivn ia32ee' '= "? '_ !
j:�;- ••1 -: .�a,a.:- iti•i- y°...: y. �, .
,m �z.i i.: -= i�::citZ fi:?i� i:3fB�j' 3.Y 'b
�.�_- r���,_ �,
z z t:s i: ti: r e:_3i"s iif?i'a� 3! '! 1` .
W '
i'' E E ] [ : �' '"" �' ' ' �.
��o, %;t ,:a c�:,;j"^� '- lj__ �=i. ,
m =; . -� .� ,��,,,;jj;::.i:°::=
'^ �j� ri i'3�fa ;��� �F�:.:e-• e]°�� i
5 i.g ¢�� aii_=a � :F:i� s�la'�=��{if=���:a'• '
s 1;�j Y�• :=za=j� x=i� .� s�ii-I'i:�� i{-+ �
e E:� :� 3�il�;'} p=dja i:=�i�t���sE�l�_�3�= �
SE. a�° _� .�i°i�=i� :�!^j i{sFj.=i.�•n�e::�:-e �
W � � }s � !Ti � 5�i:i�x ' ��',� a�i�,�.iit�i"'��i�:_ I
� � 'r�i�j itl�a i��:i�j�* �.!� ������i. ���f��t-
p ei:� ee€F �T�3���,� ai�*as �=d°€aTj.;_#;i�ai.'t j
0 ' . . . e • ���
N :i"_ ��".. .•54�1�y iS�i� i!ili�J: i"i:c�• �- i
: it : ix i�•i_ Fe 4 ��-�� ji3 .3� i i
s?fa g.:. a:!i3iii: a61�l� F:i���'•ii�-�:il�s='- i
I
i
�s _�,�.��.��:�� ��.., u
O
12.07
RO�T"T'LUND H�M�;�"'
A DMS[ON OF THE ROTTLUND COMPANY, [NC
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
Date: lC ll��
Pages Sent ( nciu ing Cover):�
TO:
Name: � 3�� ��
Company: /' � �
Telephone: .57� .3 C�Z' � a�c: S ' �
Name: ���1 �/ �ll'/'GL—�
Company:
Telephone: Fac:
Name:
Company:
Tclephone: Fax:
Name:
Company:
Telephone: Fax:
FROM:
Name: DON JENSEN
Company: Ti� ROTI'LUND COMPANY
Fax Phone:_ (612) 638-0502
Telephone: _ (612) 638-0500
, / F
f � `Ls•, i �
i� � � � — " �
��_ _J
The informat�on contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
individual of entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to
deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby not�ed that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communicaaon in enor, please immediately notify us by telephone, and return the
original message to us at che above address via the U. S. Postal Service. We �vill be happy to reimburse your for the postage.
� Please Reply Original Will Follow
Please Reply Immediately �Original Will NOT Follow
�10 Reply Necessary 12-05 FAXdoc , �
'_G8l LONG L� ROAD ROSEVtI.1.E, �iN 5it 13 �612) G38-O500 FAX (612) 638-Oi01
OBERT A. GUZY
ERNARD E. STEFFEN
ICHARD A. titERRILL
ARRELL A. JEVSE�I
FFREY S. ]OI-lNSON
USSELL H. CROWDER
N P. ERICKSON
WRE.*ICE R. JOHNSON
AVID A. COSSI
OMAS P. tilALONE
1CHAEL F. HL'RLEY
Gll. C. HERRICK
ER:LtAN L TALLE
� �� 1S '� - ; .i J •'1�� V
Barna, Guzy & Steffen, Ltd.
ATTORNEYS AT L.AW
400 �Ionhtown Financial P[aza
200 Coon Rapids Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55433-�894
(612) 780-8500 FAX (612) 780-17 i 7
Yriter�s Direct Line: (612) 783-5120
June 8, 1995
Mr. Don Jensen
The Rottl.ur_d Campar_y, Inc.
2681 Long Lake Road
Roseville, MN 55113
RE: Storm Sewer Pond Agreement
Dear pon:
CHARLES M. SEYKORA
\`'ILL1A�1 �t. HAVSEV
DAI�I[E4 D. GANTER, JR.
BEVERLY K. DODGE
CRAIG �i. AYERS
GREGG V. HERRICK
JAIAES D. HO6FC
JOA��I M. QUADE
SCOTf M. LEPAK
ELIZABETH A. SCHADING
WILLIAM F. HliEF,JER
ROSERTC. HYVES
1935•1993
Enclosed please find the proposed draft of Memorandum dealing
with the Fridley Storm Sewer Pond Agreement. Please contact me
so we can discuss any revisions necessary for the Memorandum.
Very truly, ours,
A, , � ` J
I+ ,
f � �
�� ���-- �\
y�� -�,,��
�.. .��_ _ `;
Jef frey--S . �nson
JSJ:mlg
Enclosure
�� (', � �•v f 7 �--�K-�-
�(,tivt �iCrY'�'�--
r
����+���C u,�� bu� iA�.�� ►�.�-t �,�i �t,��,;.�. ��,�. G�yt� %aG��1
f.l.'�'�L�c� � v-r.�:.r..�S avul ►�c,tiM.c�,�j frdm <,c, �,�.c,�.t�..i.c.�.�-�- r-�aoZc�.�c .�il�.L
`J " � c,-t-C-C� df.td C1�1/'�
��y.� a2a2�u; �aY' a,.t ��c�v��.�— (� eto-cc,-� s h-e� -�. '.
`,,�Un ��1. �'�(����.l� l(.i�0� F-s TLt�.1G'�LGI^. G1?�`�V' i'l l.�Wt'�
CL 4'►'���in.OZ-Q�- � %
��. � ���� ��- .
12.Q9
An Equa! Opportuniry Employer
MEMORANDIIM
TO: Donald Jensen
FROM: Jeffrey Johnson
RE: The Rottlund Company, Inc.
Fridley Storm Sewer Pond Agreement
DATE: June 8, I995
At your request, I have reviewed an unexecuted form Storm Sewer
Pond Agreement ("Agreement") generated by the City of Fridley and
i^ter.dsd te �e a� �iie� �o y��lr S��nPg�t� D��r�?�riwer_t located nea.r
the intersection of Mississippi Street and University Avenue in
the City of Fridley. Upon such review, I make the following
observations and comments:
1. The Storm Sewer Pond Agreement which the City has presented
appears to be drafted for utilization within a business park
development wherein a single property owner has developed
and will continue to own a business park. Within the
business park development, it would have been anticipated
that there are on-site detention/retention pond sewer storm
systems to handle water run-off. It further takes the
approach that all water run-off is created exclusively by
the business park development, and the detention/retention
ponds are totally encompassed within private property.
These basic premises are not consistent with the development
you are prvposing in the City of Fridley. First of all,
this is not a business park of which there will be a single
owner but there will be multiple owners of residential units
all of whom will have fractional interest in homeowner
associations of which there will be more than one. The
storm water run-off will not be generated entirely from the
'j.7?'1Vd�� �.aaEV81.C�7i12.iT. ,ti3i:� �il� 3 •is^.^.�.LI�'a..2. i:a:3�^vif f�0� 'L7�.::%� iC
dedicated roadways and improvements. The proposed
detention/retention ponds abut upon a dedicated public
roadway.
With these factual circumstances, the Storm Sewer Pond
Agreement unreasonably assesses costs and liabilities to The
Rottlund Company and its successors which would include
individual homeowners, and several homeowner associations.
2. Obviously, once the development has been completed, Rottlund
would require that it be released from any liabiiity for
repair and maintenance obligations pursuant to this
Agreement. This is not adequately addressed within the
Agreement and must specifically state that upon completion
12.10
of the development and transfer of all ownership interest
Rottlund is relieved of further obligations under the
Agreement.
3. As I stated earlier, the Agreement, I believe, unreasonably
assesses obligations and liabilities to individual property
owners and homeowner associations for what is commonly
viewed as a municipal service. Under the Minnesota Common
Interest Ownership Act, Section 515B.3-205, a homeowner's
association may terminate without penalty agreements entered
into by the declarant (Rottlund) which may be viewed as
unconscionable to the unit owners at the time entered into
under the circumstances then prevailing. The standard of
unconscionability will be a fact question but it is quite
possible that the associations and the unit owners may be
able to meet the threshold to demonstrate the
uncr�scionani��it_� of t`k �igr•2e�e.^.t. IF ��:cY ar� suc�essful,
the Agreement would no longer be enforceable by the City.
I would suggest
staff to attempt
City maintaining
sewer system.
g:\realest\jsj\rotttund�fridley.agr
that we address-these issues with the City
to structure an acceptable method for the
the on-site detention/retention pond storm
12.11
MEMO TO: BARB DACY, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FROM: RICHARD LARSON, DEPUTY CHIEF
DATE: MARCH 21, 1995
RE; ROTTLUND SOUTHWEST QUADRANT
issues important to the fire department:
1. Access from Mississippi St. south into Syivan Hiils area.
Contractor must provide an ail-weather surface road for emergency vehicle use.
This would include access travefing west on Mississippi St. (our normal route).
2. Hydrant location within complex.
Hydrants must be located within 100 feet of any required fire department
sprinklerlstandpipe connection.
Hydrants throughout development can be spaced no further than 400 feet apart.
Hydrants that service structures or dead end roads can be no further than 175
feet from the most remove structure.
3. A11 measurements are taken along norma{ vehicfe travel (curb travel) and not
over yards or through open spaces.
4. All hydrants must be visible and kept clear of snow and obstruction as needed.
5. Any secure building (apactments) that have a common e�trance will require the
installation of a fire department approved key box for easy entrance by
emergency personne{.
RHUss
wsa,�omw,a
12
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
�
Enqineerinc;
Sc wCr
.,�1�,
(' . � r 'n =�
'�fre.e . �
'�?di�1!llSdfllti
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
on Wilczek, Assistant Public Works Dixector
March 23, 1995
PW95-073
Southwest Quadrant Comments, Stonegate Redevelopment
Move 3rd Street to the far west end of the project to have it line up with existing 2nd Street
on the north and Jupiter Road on the south end. The westerly location would fit in better
with future plans and allow for more stacking distance on Mississippi Street, as well as
provide for safer turning movements and merging. The direct connection to Jupiter Road
would provide more direct access for emergency vehicles to the area south of Satellite Lane.
� :_� _
1.
2.
3.
4.
Increase pond sizes in order to lower the required flow rate out of the ponds.
Increase the amount of flow going to R,ice Creek.
ElinZinate the flow going to the norihwest (bring it south or to the northeast).
Decrease the flow to the south so it can be taken overland rather than piped.
The amount of flow shown going to the south exceeds the capacity of the system downstream
and will have to be lowered. Possible ways of lowering this flow would be to take some of the
flow to the north and increasing the size of the ponds. Jon Wilczek is willing to sit down and
go through the specifics on this and discuss options.
12.13
�
•u •.
.., ._ ,
March 24, 1995
Page 2
� � � �
The following changes should be made to the sanitary sewer system:
1. Both ends of Kasota Court should flow to the center court and then to
Satellite Lane.
2. The three northwesterly 16 unit buildings and the westerly 24 unit building
should be connected to the 15-in. line on University Avenue.
3. The 15-in. line should be accessed via the manhole just north of Kasota Drive.
4. Connect the far southwest 16 unit on Satellite Lane to the sewer on Kasota
Drive.
These changes would maximize the amount of sanitaiy flow going to the 15-in. trunk line on
University Avenue and min' i�� the amount of flow going to the lift station at Sylvan Hills.
The length of sewers would be about the same and the deep section of sewer along Kasota
Court and 3rd Street would be much shallower.
Watermain
l. Connect to the 12-in. watermain on University Avenue just north of Kasota
Drive.
2. Connect proposed 8-in. watermain on Kasota Court to the watermain on
Satellite Lane at far west end of project.
3. Hydrants as needed for fire protection.
Easements
Will need a water and sewer easement along Kasota Drive from University Avenue to 3rd
Street (the west end of the property). The easement is based on 3rd Street being moved to
the westerly part of the project in order to encompass the east-west trunk lines of the project.
The City will be responsible for the main line sewer and watermain within the right-of-way
of the proposed 3rd Street and the above mentioned easement. All other sewer and
watermain trunk lines and all service lines would be the responsibility of the development
(private lines).
JW:ez
12.14
ent a few years ago and the commield�nexs recommendation
tournam e the $50.00/
at that time was to charg ed for the use of
Mr. Young stated theelscifroneuwasmcha ged,cthey should all be
the fields and he f
charged.
olicy must remain consistent.
Mr. Kirk stated he also feels the P and the clean-up
50.00/field or $150.00 fee woulelds�readyse to the amount o
The $ uts in getting the fi
work the City p
afterwards.
MOTION by Mr. Young, seconded by
Ms. Price to approve the request
ields Comm I, Comm 10 and High School Main for th19951for a
for F 21 through JulY 23�
Youth Baseball tournament on July h removal be assessed to
50.00 per field and that the asditional costs incurred y
fee of $ or excess tr
the City for satellites,
the Fridley Youth Baseball.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE,
�L �grqgggS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED TJN�ZM�IISLY •
3, OLD BUSINESS
ate Development:
a, park Dedication for Stoneg the
iece of property is developed,
Mr. Kondrick stated when a p er. The
Rottlund Homes), because
City assesses a Park eea�eaDevelopment (he d�Ve �Pto the City for
developer of the Ston g a ortion of the property
they will be dedicating P
ic rivate space, has asked that their Park Dedication ee
a publ /P
($109,500) be waived.
Mr. Kirk stated at May
meeting of the Park & Recre�esent to
est that the dedication fees be
Commission, Mr. Don Jensen of Rottlund Homes was
discuss the development and requ
would like
waived. The commissioner�hetrequest1�e Stated they
some time to think about roviding the
ment plan. The
Mr. Kirk stated that Rotta�dofStheir1develop p were
public/private space as p p00 square feet. If they
total space is estimated at based on the size of thel� Was noted
dedicating land to the City p00 square feet.
development,
it would be about 62. e ortion of the area is
ark ].and. The staff was asked to come
by one of the commissioners that a larg
ponds and unusable for P are footage after subtracting the
back with the amounto d a�a is 15,
00o square feet (area always
ponding area. The p this amount from 80,000, they
having water). After subtracting a�k land.
arrived at 65,000 square feet of usable p
12.15
c
500. �
for Rottlund's Park Dedicatio65W000dfor the9plaza
The liability ected to pay approximately S lanting of trees
Rottlund is exp Stem in addition to P that
area and bituminous trail sY ut in larger
and landscaping. Mr. Jensen had noted at the last meeting
ark fees were waived, they would be able to p
if the p lantings. It is Mr. Kirk's underu��ingngn
trees and more dense p onsible for p
however, that Rottlund Homes is still resp
trees and landscaping. roximately
The total sQu
are footage of the plaza area is app
15,300 square feet.
Mr.
Kirk stated what he believes the City Council is looking for
is
a recommendation from the Parkthis developmentCa dlif1theYs o
wha�t the park fees should be °r art.
should be waived, in full or in p
Mr. Young stated he feels no fees should bThislhas not been done
should be required to paY the full fees.
in the past. It is nat fair tobdo a�tractiveme If theeCity
property more saleable and visi a recedence for future
waives the fee, they are setting P invested a sizable
developments. He stated the City has �oveaang incentives for the
amount of money in this development, P ro erty.
Rottlund Company to come in and improve that p P
ac stated redevelopment is never_ama erabutva�moneYrlOSerg
Ms. D Y to acquire
and most of then�iaesignificantaamount of money not be able to
The HRA has sp ro erties. They may
properties and to clear the p P, otiation on what
recover all of the costs. At this .time,
the neg
' tance Rottlund receives is stilio �entlpi�n willsbethe HRA
assis
does not know whaotiatedlbasedeonethe sale price on the land an
Everything is neg lanning process before they can
they must go through all of the p
rice, etc. No matter who develo�pkinq
determine the fladrantlethe redevelopment is not a money-
the southwest qu
venture.
ation to the projected selling
Youn stated the amount that Rittlund would need to raise t e
Mr. g ro erty
price of each unit was small ln re from the City,
rice of it. He truly believe� that Rottlund wants the p P
P ealing and if they do not get the money
to be app He noted there
they lo ees to use. The
will tack it on to theCp�i�Hallfforeemp1tY.
is already a plaza park by Y
new plaza will not necessarily be of great benefit to them.
� ark dedication fee of $109,500 was based on
Mr. Kirk stated the Per unit.
a figure of $750.00 p
12.16
PARRS AND RECREATION COMMZSSION MEETING - JIINE 5 1995 PAGE 7
Mr. Young stated he
improvements to the
people living in it.
providing parks for
area.
feels waiving of the fee allow for
development which will mainly benefit the
The City has the responsibility of
all of Fridley and not just for one sma1Z
Mr. Solberg asked if there has ever been a situation where
Fridley has waived a Park Dedication Fee.
Mr. Kirk stated he does not believe a fee has ever been waived.
Mr. Solberg stated he agrees with much of what Mr. Young has
stated. However, what will happen if the City does not approve
the waiving of the fees?
Ms. Dacy stated the City Council and the HRA from the very
beginning wanted some type of "focal point" for the development
and also to tie it into the "downtown area". The City can still
require a public easement over the area. She noted that the past
deveZoper for the area did not provide anything usable for the
area, and Rottlund has proposed a significant amount of
improvements that they will do that typically the City would not
get with a developer if it was not a redevelopmen� project plus
the easement and some amount of fees. Rottlund has also
indicated that they would be responsibZe for the maintenance of
the area.
Mr. Kirk stated the past developer wanted the City to take a
piece of the property and then also to maintain it. Rottlund has
agreed to take over the maintenance of the property regardless of
what the City chooses to do.
Mr. Kondrick stated he is in agreement with Mr. Young. The
$109,500 is a lot of money and those dollars are very precious to
the City. There could be 30-40 smaller things that the City
could use the money far.
Mr. Solberg stated on the flip side, he would l.ike to see the
development look as good as possible. The park plaza may be a
way to enhance the City. Perhaps a solution would be to waive a
portion of the fees, with the City still receiv:ing some revenue.
Mr. Kondrick stated he feels Rottlund will develop
anyway. In addition they will be maintaining the
that will cost them a considerable amount of money
years, perhaps the City could give them some sort
percentage of the money due us. He would be more
with this type of arrangement. He would not be in
waiving the fees altogether.
12.17
the land
area. Since
over the
of credits on a
comfortable
favor of
Mr. Solberg asked if only a portion of the fees are waived, would
Rottlund still provide the same improvements as if they had
agreed to waive the entire amount?
Mr. Kirk stated he believes that this was addressed at the last
meeting by Mr. Jensen of Rottlund Company. He understood that
whatever the City credits to them will go back into the
development.
Ms. Dacy stated the developer will factor back the costs of what
they have to spend in order to achieve the development. It is
all a negotiation issue when it comes down to the economics of
the project. It is important for the commissioners to keep true
to their principles of what the City is getting back in return
and how it compares with other requests.
Mr. Kondrick stated if the City will not waive the fees, it is
his feelings that Rottlund will make the improvements anyway.
They will need to put something there that will help to market
the townhomes.
Ms. Sibell asked how long Rottlund has been doing business in the
area.
Ms. Dacy stated Rottlund has been in the area for some time.
They have a townhome project on Sullivan Lake and a redevelopment
project pending in New Brighton.
Ms. Dacy informed the commissioners that if this was not a
redevelopment project, Rottlund would have to do either one
two things - dedicate 10% of the land or pay park dedication
fees. They would just be dedicating raw land with no
improvements and no maintenance. With this development, we
getting an easement to the raw land as well as improvements,
maintenance and possibly the fees.
of
are
Mr. Kondrick stated he feels the park dedication fees would '_
provide a substantial amount of money to the City to allow them -
to do improvements not only there but also in other areas of the
City.
Ms. Dacy stated what she understands the commissioners to say is
that they are not really sure about how much public use the area
would provide, but on the other hand the City would be getting
something tangible in response. She stated she feels there
should be some amount of reduction in the fees, however that is
up to the commission to decide.
Mr. Young stated he does not think the average citizen will look
at the park plaza as a public park. No parking will be provided
other than that provided to the residents. It is likely that
12.18
�.,.,�,.�.__
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING - JUNE 5, 1995 PAGE 9
residents of the townhomes would object to added congestion in
the area.
Mr. Solberg stated Rottlund is a profit-making entity and it is
his feeling that they will find a way to pay for the
improvements. They were aware of the costs up front.
MOTION by Mr. Young, seconded by Ms. Price to recommend to the
City Council that no Park Dedication Fees be waived for Rottlund
Company and that they be required to pay the full fee of
$109,500.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, .ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPEIt30N RONDRICR
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOUSLY.
b. John Gargaro Memorial
Mr. Kirk informed the commissioners that since the last meeting
of the Park and Recreation Commission, a group of citizens came
before the City Council with a petition signed by over 1,000
residents, saying that they would Zike to see Conununity Park
named after John Gargaro. The City Council had an alternative to
their proposal which included a commemorative space which would
be used to recognize citizens who have made cantributions towards
the betterment of the community. Ms. Michele McPherson, Planning
Assistant, had designed a model of this proposed area and has had
an opportunity to discuss the proposal with the City Council as
well as with some of the residents.
Mr. Kondrick stated since the last meeting, it. seems to him that
there are even more people who seem to think t.he same as Mr.
Solberg and himself on this issue. The contributions of Mr.
Gargaro are so extensive and wide spread that he deserves special
recognition. With 1,000 responding to an issue such as this, it
speaks much of what the community wants. He still feels the
community park should be named after Mr. Gargaro, and it would be
a great honor.
Mr. Solberg stated Mr. Gargaro was an exceptional example. He
feeZs that the commemorative space is a wonderful idea and that
after they name John Gargaro Community Park, they should continue
with the idea.
Ms. Sibell stated the number of signatures on the petition
represents the community's thoughts. She feels we ne�d to
reiterate to the City Council that we all need to be united on
this issue and stress to the City Council how important this is
to the community.
Mr. Young and Ms. Price had no further comments.
12.19
DESCRIPTION OF RE�UEST:
Rottlund Homes Inc. and the City of Fridley HRA are requesting a rezoning from G3, Ge�era!
Shopping and R-3, Multipie Family to S-2, Redevelopment District, in order to construct 146
townhomes and condominiums in the Center City Redevelopment District. The S-2
Redevelopment District requires plan approval by the Planning Commission, HRA, and City
Council to insure consistency with the objectives of the Redevelopmerrt Pfan.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
The purpose of the City CounciPs first public hearing is to review the computer-generated
video prepared by Macromedia Technologies, Inc., review the Planning Commission
recommendation, receive public comment, and provide initial feedback to the developer so
that plans can be amended for review by the City Council at its August 14, 1995 meeting.
The developer will present an overview of the project after the video is shown. Because of
the size of the project, discussion should be focused on the following major issues: housin
types, 3rd Street aliQnment and intersection, buffers and entry fe�atures, and design of the
public/private elaza. Remaining issues can be addressed at the second hearing.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission reviewed the project twice on March 29 and April 26, 1995. The
Planning Commission recommended approval of "Plan B Revised" subject to stipulafions 1-
18.
12.20
Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-01
Rottlund Homes Inc.
Page 2
Stipulations as recommended by the Planning Commiasion:
1. Rottlund Homes, Inc., shail comply with the stipulations of P.S. #95-01 and SAV #95-02.
2. Rottlund Homes shali obtain a permit irom Anoka Cour�ty regarding the proposed intersection
prior to initiation of grading, and shall comply with ail Courrty requiremerrts. Rotdund Homes,
Inc., shall be responsibie for all costs associated with the realignment of the Holly Center
driveway.
3. Rottlund Homes, Inc., shall cooperate with the owners of RAO ManuFacturing to insure proper
screening and erosion coritrol along the common lot lines.
4. A$60,000 performance bond shall be submitted prior to the initiation of grading to insure
insta!lation and maintenance of the proposed landscaping as approved by the City Council.
The performance bond shall remain in force through one growing season of vegeta�on
proposed in the plan.
5. The developer shall submit a revised .landscaping plan prior to May 15, 1995.
6. Omamental iron fencing shall be installed along University Avenue with interspersed stone
columns. Additional vegetation shall also be installed along University Avenue as determined
by staff.
7. Rottlund Homes, Inc., shall obtain any necessary permits from MnDOT regarding fencing,
utilities, grading or other issues.
8. The entry features shatl be instal(ed according to the plan prepared by Arteka dated April 20,
1995.
9. Rottlund Homes, Inc., shall design the public/private plaza according to the recommendation
of the Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission, and Ciiy Council.
10. The bituminous bikeway/walkway shall be 8 feet in width.
11. All utility boxes or other minor accessory structures shall be properly screened with vegetation
or decoraUve fencing.
12. Two globe acom decorative light standards shall be installed along Thirc! Street.
13. Additional single globe light standards shall be installed in the southeast part of the site f�or the
attached units.
14. Revised architectural plans shall be submitted showing additional brick fascia on all housing
types prior to May 15, 1995.
15. Vsion 2000 windows shall be installed in all units.
12.21
Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-01
Rottlund Homes inc.
Page 3
16. A list of interior product manufacturers and types shall be submitted for all housing types by
May 15, 1995.
17. The condominium declaration shall cor�tain language providing for the repair, replacement, and
mairrtenar�ce of the light fixtures in the developmerrt excluding the fixtures in the public right of
�+►ay.
18. Rottlund Homes, Inc., shall enter irrto a developmerrt contract with the Fridley Housing and
Redevelopmerit Authority and shall comply with all of its provisions.
DEVELOPMENT SITE ANALYSIS
Computer Simulation
Macromedia Technologies Incorporated has prepared a two minute video simulafing the proposed
development and has also prepared four computer generated photographic stills of the development
The video is orierrted so that the viewer wilf proceed through the site beginning with the public/private
plaza area and proceeding along the proposed trail. The viewer will see the various housing types
as well. The purpose of the photographic stills is to help the Commission and Council visualize the
impact of the various housing types, including the newly proposed eight-unit buildings in the southeast
comer.
Basis for Development Plan Review
Because the development is located in a redevelopment district, a rezoning application to change the
zoning to the S-2, Redevelopment District is appropriate and is consistent with past redevelopment
projects.
The S-2 district does not provide any specific requirements as is typically found in other zoning
districts; it esserrtially provides for a"PUD" approach. The S-2 district does state that the "performance
standards" referred to in "comparable" districts be used. The performance standards in the R-3 district
are general in nature and do not dictate any standards regarding lot area, setbacks, height, etc. The
standards primarily pertain to screening standards and maintenance issues.
Because the development is a redevelopment project, imposing the typical standards is not
appropriate. The S-2 district provides the City and the developer with maximum site plan flexibility to
achieve the goals of the redevelopment.
In order to provide "design" guidance for the pro�ect and to assess how it would retate to the
remaining areas of the Center city district, the City Council and HRA authorized the "hiring" of design
consultants.
The goals of the design guidelines are:
A. Develop a design pattem of compatibility between adjacent neighbortioods and with the
character of the City.
12.22
Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-01
Rottlund Homes Inc.
Page 4
B. Fost� quality site design and architectural design, de�ailing, and materials fio promote
initiai sales and lasting home values.
C. Promote pedestrian circulation, and public and semi-public spaces that foster
neighbofiood vitafity and are unlikely to become security concems.
D. Create a strong sense of neighbort�ood and a unique image.
E. Foster design flexibility between the developer and the City.
ROTTLUND pPLAN B REVISED"
The Planning Commissior� recommended approval of "Plan B Revised". A summary matrix of the
different plans is attached �nd all plans have been submitted to the City Council. Four housing types
are now proposed: 48 senior condominiums (the developer is following through with recent City
Council and HRA direcction), 6 eight-unit attached condominiums, 24 two-story detached townhomes,
and 26 one-story townhomes.
Twro key issues were discussed by the Planning Commission which dictated a change in the housing
types and density. First, concem was raised about the originally proposed 6 sixteen-unit attached
buildings in the northwest and southeast comer of the site. The concems were:
♦ Future salability of the unit
♦ Narrow width of the interior units
♦ Amount of asphalt surrounding the buildings
♦ Lack of semi-private open space
♦ Density of the development
The developer addressed the concems by creating eight-unit buildings in the southeast comer of the
site, and proposed a fourth housing type in the northwest comer. A two-story detached townhome
ranging in saie price from $115,000 to $145,000 is proposed. Three floor plans are proposed; one
with a master bedroom on the first floor (see attached matrix on housing types).
The second concem was the location of the 3rd Street intersection. The plan submitted to the
Planning Commission showed the intersection just west of the nnedian in Mississippi Street. The
Planning Commission reviewed four altematives for the 3rd Street alignmerrt and the pros and cons
of each (see attached matrix). The recommendation was to pursue the ir�tersection alignment
proposed in Plan B Revised where 3rd Street is located 35 feet east of the existing location. The
access to Holly Cerrter is also proposed to be realigned.
3rd Street Intersection
The devetoper has prepared a traffic study in accordance with the Corrtract for Exctusive Negotiations
(attached). Another memo was prepared to address the issues pertaining to the proposed alignment
Anoka County wiU require construction of protected tum lanes, medians, and widening of the street.
Key poirrts from the traffic analyses are:
12.23
Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-01
Rottlund Homes inc.
Page 5
1. The anticipated developmerrt density has drasticaily changed since originally considered in 1985.
A mixed use devetopmerrt of commercial retait and apartments was proposed. The volume of
traffic generated from that developmerrt may have generated enough traific to wamant a stop
sign at minimum i� Mississippi Street, and possibly a signal. The proposed developmerrt
density will be at least half of what exists today.
2. If 3rd Street was aligned across from 2nd Street, there would not be adequate volumes for
traffic control now or in the future.
3. Exis�ting traffic from the Holly Cer�ter driveway is large enough that a four-way stop may be
warranted in the future, but the County would have to approve such a request. Because of
the distance to the University Avenue intersection, the County may not approve the request.
4. A future plan of combining the traffic from 2nd Street and Holly Center may be possible by
acquiring and removing the office building located between 2nd Street and Holly Centers
d riveway.
5. Traffic operations on Mississippi Street will improve because several existing driveways are
eliminated and access is proposed via one street intersection.
6. The grade on Mississippi Street for traffic eastbound may pose a problem during the winter if
a signal or stop sign is located at 2nd Street. The developers traffic consultant noted that the
geometrics at 2nd Street (hill to go under railroad bridge) may make an exclusive left-tum north
into 2nd Street difficult.
LANDSCAPING/BUFFERS/ENTRY DESIGN
Buffers are proposed along Mississippi Street, University Avenue, and a portion of the common lot line
in the northwest part of the site with RAO Manufiacturing.
The Mississippi Street buffer will be eight feet in height at installation. Proposed is an altemating
scheme of arborvitae and stone-like columns. Two foot berm will also be provided in some areas.
The buffer is accented by a mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees. Along University Avenue, a
six foot vinyl clad chain link fence with decorative stone-like columns is proposed with vegetation along
the fence line. Small berms will also be added. MnDOT has been contacted to determine if an
altemative to the chain link would be acceptable, and to insure that the decorative fence would in fact
replace a chain link fence from being installed by MnDOT. Altematives to the vinyl clad chain link
fence would include a wrought iron or a metal decorative fence. Because of the appearance of chain
link and because of the opportunity to set a standard for future redevelopment projects along the
University Avenue corridor, it is recommended that the chain link material be avoided and that another
material be used which provides the same amount of security, but has a better appearance. MnDOT
is agreeable to this option (see letter dated May 15, 1995).
The fencing along University Avenue should also be rounded at the top or not corrtain any sharp
edges. Hopefully, children will not try to scale the fence, but in case that it does happen, it should
be designed appropriately. Further, because the fence will form an edge beiween the development
12.24
Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-01
Rottiund Homes Inc.
Page 6
and the MnDOT right-of-way, it should be designed for additional stress from additional snow loads.
There may be a need for more supports along the alignmerrt of the fence.
Along the westerly lot line and the common lot lines with RAO ManuFacturing, a sa fioot w�ooden
shadow box screen fence is proposed. Further discussion about the transition to RAO is provided
later.
The developer has revised the landscape plan according to the Planning Commission's direcction.
A perFormance bond in the amount of $60,000 shatl be submitted to insure installation of the
landscaping as required and shall be held unti( one fuil growing season has occurred for all materials.
The developer's landscape consultant has submitted a plan detail for the entry features on Mississippi
Street. The plan appe�ars to provide for a 25 foot site distance triangle. The monument is a cast
stone wall with the project identification sign located in the middle, One monumerrt is proposed on
the west side of the irrterseetion. The plan also shows the monument flanked by omamerrtal metal
fencing with stone columns. Flowers are proposed to be plarrted in front of the monumerrt.
Design of the Public/Private Plaza
The developer has prepared a more detailed concept plan for the public/private plaza in the northeast
part of the site. The developer is requesting a 100% credit on the required park dedication fees since
the developer is designing, installing, and maintaining the plaza. Further, the developer will grant a
public easement over the plaza and the proposed trail and park areas in the middle of the plat The
Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the design of the plaza and recommended denial of the
request to waive the fees.
The park fees total $109,500 ($750/unit). The Commission questioned the amount of public use the
park would receive and felt it was a very large amount to waive. The Commission felt that it was
really the developer's park and that it would be constructed anyway.
Staff recommends a 50% reduction based on the fact that the developer is constructing and
maintaining the improvements at a cost of at least $65,000 ($20,000 for the trails and $45,000 for the
plaza).
Architecture
The architect, Tim Whitten, has prepared a written description of the architectural concepts of the
development as well as individual descriptions of each of the housing clusters. The staff analysis of
the architectural concepts attached in a separate memo. In general, the proposed plan meets the
goals of the design guidelines, and incorporates many suggested f�tures including:
A. Design flexibility in the one-story, empty nester product.
B. Incorporation of bay windows in the eight-unit, young professional buildings.
12.25
Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-01
Rottlund Homes Inc.
Page 7
C. Higher quality window design for sound insulation.
D. Underground parking for the senior condominiums.
E. Compatible building heights with the neighborhood to the south and taller buildings near
University Avenue.
F. Variety of options for colors on the two-story and on�story units.
G. Interseccting building .facades with high pitched roofs, dormers, and stepped building
facades.
Brick has been the central architectural feature in the Center City district as well as elsewhere in the
community. Norwood Square, the recently constructed senior apartment building, was required to be
100% brick exterior. The remaining office buildings in the southeast quadrant were also required to
have brick exteriors. During the design guideline development, it was discussed that the materials
should be considered in relation to the design of the building versus a mandate of 100% brick.
The proposed plan incorporates brick around one-story of the senior units and brick accents around
the garages in the one-story and two-story units. The eight-unit buildings appear to have brick at
entrance steps and the garages.
Staff recommends the following:
A. Adding brick on the senior units on the second and third stories on the "columns" of the
building and on the front elevations of the building which exte�d in front of the main
entrance.
B. Extending the brick features around the entrances (including the area above the window
above the door) of the units in the eight-unit buildings.
C. There are several options with the empty nester product. One option has the side of
the garage facing the street; brick could be added on this wall. Another option has
brick flanking the garage doors facing the street; brick could be added to the front ofi
the living area to tie in with the brick on the garage.
D. Additional areas for brick on the two-story units would also help to tie the entrance with
the garage.
In general, the exterior is very appealing and well designed. Because of the City's past design
preferer�es and because of its durability and attractiveness, additional brick on the exterior should be
considered.
Any utility boxes or other minor structures must be properly screened by vegetation or decorative
fencing. Plan details must be submitted at time of building permit issuance.
12.26
Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-01
Rottiund Homes Inc.
Page 8
The Vsion 2000 windows as proposed by the architect shall be installed on all units.
Lighting
Three 25 foot tali shoebox style lights are proposed along 3rd Street. Decorative acom single globe
fixtures (see enclosed detai� at 15 feet tall are proposed along the trail and at strategic poirrts on the
private driveways. The revised plan, however, does not indicate any light in the vicinity of the eight
unit buildings. Decorative lighting should be extended in this area.
The proposed 15 foot light standard is attractive and emulates the City's light standards on Mississippi
Street. It is so attrac�tive in tact that the double globe standard is recommended rather than the
shoebox style lights within the public right-of-way. The decorative standard provides a unique and
distinct appearance for the development. The Planning Commission recommended that staff vvork with
the developer about this concept.
The condominium declaration shall contain language insuring proper maintenance and replacemerrt
of fixtures not within the public right-of-way.
RAO Manufacturing
The owners of RAO Manufacturing are investigating noise barrier improvements and parking area
modifications. City staff determined that the noise from RAO at peak periods is below the maximum
levels. RAO wants to resolve noise issues as soon as possible to prevent future concems from
Stonegate residents. The developer's proposed six foot privacy fence along the common west lot line
will help.
RAO and the developer have agreed to a landscape and drainage plan along the common lot line.
RECOMMENDATION
Still to be resolved is the size and number of senior condominium units. The City Council should
receive public comment, provide feedback to the developer about the key issues discussed above,
and table the hearing until August 14, 1995.
BD/dw
12.27
i
cr�
j�C �. .�
i � �� `�
V
I � r� I�
� `� ��
���y
� ��i +�
ii�
M f0
0
y{� �r
rs
' �
`� `�
M �
�
! �
� +�
V
C� »�
M i\i
V ��
V + �
-� ti�
N �z
M �+�
� `
�
�
�
v O �
� �
�
J �
Service
I
�
s�
v/
� `�
v
�
�
�
�
�
M �
��
��
Street
�
�
University Avenue N.B.
ZOA ��95-01
Rottlund Homes Inc
�
r
��
. ��
...
_�
..�
S�►'
..
�
�� V�
V
��
��
r �
r
- �.
pr.
_...� �
�
t"��
�
; .
e developer is requ�ting the following:
, A change in the zoning otthe property irn�n commescia! snd mukipk familY residentia! to
redevebpment district.
� A new �nbdivi�ion oithe property with new bts snd bt lina. � ;
The reka�e ot the Citys interat in roads and ea�ements snd dedk�tbn of new streets and ea:ements.
� e dcv�elope: is propoaing a raiatatial aevelopment ca�prixd of caodominiums ana towahomes. su aov�r-occupied. N—�
1 "l.lii 1
�_
OCATION MAP
H
�
W
O
F
�
�
�
�
F
�.
�
z
�
w
O
a
�
�
�
t/�
�
.��
a3�
o ; �
f�U W y � •°
v� o � �
� �" v -"".� `�'' \° \°
�r � � O y N e ~
Cai � � eT' `��' N N � ^� xi . � '��' �V N
�
�
�
4.i
� L� N
F � 3
H �
y � �
�� tn OC 00 00 OC �^ DO n �'"
pC, pr •--� � �' � N N O �+ et � N
C
W � �..�
ppp...,,, �
�O
� w s
� ��
��
� � ¢ 3 •�
� ,� - � �
x H� ._'°4 � �
� ..a � oo �o 00
~ a � n c°�
c�4 a �- r� v� rn cv o o ri -� �n � c�
b
c
N �
� r"'
� O �
H� ya
� �
�� o� �
�a ���
ao N �� o� Q Q
G�4 a � r, v � c°OV o o ri v� c� Z z z
�, >,
� � � �� �� � N
d� �' � ° w w � �
2 ° � � � 4? .� «�.+ >
a� w ox., � o � � 3 a c. �
W o 0 o F., � � o
r�" � � V � �� H y °o �' g
'2 � �
.r .. :� a� �
z zh'' � :° � N� d a o a�
12.29
V
�
H
�
w
O
�
�
�
�
�
a
�
�
W
a
F
�
�
�
�
x
�
�
� �
�
� �
^C3 O
Q O
O
O ,_,,,
�^'" � -d '� p
Q x N y O
� U v� v�i M � N N C � ►.� a o�0
y H
,7" � � O
�A N M O
(� O O O
� � � �� �
W Q M M �� � �� O
"C � y„ O
E"'� iC iC �� y y U � �
E"� Q� M � N N �� N N � � �-+ N �
W ,�
� �
�
� � Q U O
� y. O N a �.. O
7 A„r/ ,'Z," O N � a O
� �� � � ° � � o
O `�' a k ° ,cr � a�i �, o
x 3a N N o � ��� � o
E^� � N i�l �i�i � M N >, A� N •--�
0
v� v �
W o�o a�
� � Q Of3, �
.., �
++ �" O
[-� � O � O � O
k O
O N N N M � N y V ��1
e r-+ �I M � N r-+ >+ >, �t N �
�
y �
� �
.� �bq w �
i� W � x � � y�+ y U
� O bQ •O :S G � � � V!
.�i Ln' V� � � cd �
�0 � ;b � � p � � � � �
� � �
a z c� A H �� w A C�7 >
12.30
�
��
�
TEL rao .
Architectural Coacept
Rpr 19,9s Z1�3Z P.OZ
The goals of the archite�ture and site plan of the Stonegate Dcvelopment were to create a
neighborhood that has an image of its own, but is compatible with the sunounding
� community. To desiga housing. products that sadsfy a variety of market areas. For each
���� product �to stand on its own architecturally, i�ut to �have common threads:of archit�ctural �
elements, materials; and colors connecting all ptoducts to enhance the overal� sense of .
neighborhood. For all�housing to be owner'occupied for a long term investment and :� �
commitment to. the community: And to� create a aeighborhooi� that is stronger becaus�: of :�
the yariety. of housing than�if each product stood on its own. .. .� � �
The Stonegate neighborhood has four distinct housing clusters. The main eatrance &om
Mississippi Street becomes a public street, which allows direct access to each cluster
without having to tra.vel through one cluste; to get to another. The Srst cluster is two
buildings of condominiums, the tallest buildings at four stories, are placed at the most
active corner of the site, the corner of University and NLssissippi. The townhame three-
story buildings are placed at the second mo�t active portion of the site, along University.
The condominiums and townhomes act as s�rong shoulders to protect the interior passive
park ac�a and the Single Family one-story h�using and Cluster Housing. The singte
family, located at the southwest portion of the site, is the most compatible product to the
adjacent existing neighborhood ta the south. The two-story single family housing is at
the Northwest corner along Mississippi.
The Condominium buildings are placed in such a manner as to create a public open space
at the corner of University and Mississippi. This plaza is to act as a buffer to the
intersection for the Condominiums aad to also invite the community to the neighborhood.
The two buiidings then create a narrow ope�ting to de5ne the transition from active open
space to a passive park.
The Townhomes are positioned as to limit the view of the garage doors from University.
Also, the sides of th� townhome buildings have minimum openings.
The Single Family one-story cluster is in the quietest corner of the site and has an identity
of its own with a separate entrance from Satellite Lane. The homes are oriented to take
advantage of the interior park.
The Single Family two-story housing cluste� has its own identity, but is connected to the
Single Famity one-story. They also have a�trong relationship to the interior park.
The Park begins at its most active and publip ro!e at the corner of Mississippi and
University as a Plaza azea. At this point it itttroduces itself and is an invitation to the
balance of the interior park, becoming a passive experience through the neighborhood
with ponds, trails, and extensive lanciscaping.
12.31
�
TEL N0. Rpr 19,95 21�33 P.03
There are bernis placed along Univerisity Avenue and Mississippi Street that consist of a
combination of earth, landscaping, and stoa� piers and fencing. There is also berming
along the west side of the site betwe8n the s�ngle family two-story and the existing
industrial. It is intended to take the element- of the stone material and thread it into the
architecture of the Townhoaxs and Condo�iniums. A brick similar to the Target .
building is intendeci to be �incorporated into many of the housing products. The color of �
the brick and roofmg.material is proposed to be con:sistent through the neighborhood. �.
The siding colors of the two condominium buildings will be the same. The six townhome �
.� buildings� will-be the same,.b�t. diffecent, yet compatible witt� the condominiums. The .�
: single family homes� will have more variety in sid'ing and trim colors1 but wilt include and
compliment the colors of the condos and townhomes. .
The Rottlund Company has experience in the area of Sound Attenuation, most recerrtly
with the River blufftownhome project in Bloomington, due to the air traffic noise. Along
with construction systems, the windows wei'e addressed and selected based on their STC
rating. Weathershield �isions 2000 were used because of their STC rating of 31-33
surpasses the STC of �ven Pella windows.(see attached test results). Sound Transmission
Class(STC) is the measurement of decibel relief from the exterior noise source to the
interior noise levels. i.e. 65db outside minus�31=34db insid� quiet.
12.32
TEL N0.
Condominiums- Senior Market, Owaer Ouupied
Rpr 19,95 21�34 P.O�
• Two buildings of Z4 units each to tota148 units
• 4-story bulding (6 units per floor)
� Undergound parking T.125 parking spaceS/unit .
• �ommon entrance with elevator ' � . �
• 1220 sq; ft. per unit on one level . .
• Unit to be priced� approxunately 586,000-5100,000 . . ��,
• � Wood &ame cansvuction with fire s,prinkler system � - � . -
Interior Finishes and Appliances: similar to the Rottlund "Garden Home" product
Exterior Materials:
� "Stone like" base
• Brick concentrated on main level - tp match Target building
• Vinyl lap siding
• Asphalt shu�gles �
• Windows - Weathershield vsions 2Q00, vinyl
The condominiums were designed to affer an affordable owaership opportunity to the
senior market. A goal was to avuid the typical apartment image. One way was tu U��_�:���._.
smaller buildings for a more intimate relatiopship. For example, the pariciag garag� ���� ��:�:
only 24 residents and each floor has only 6 units. The other way was to avoid long,
narrow corridors by including a single loaded corridor of only 80' in length with t�v?�r�����G
on one side and a maximum of 40' &om the elevator to any unit. �'he main entrance t6
each building includes an exterior landscaped eourtyard.
Two thirds of the units are corner units with windows on two sides of the units.
All units will feature 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, a laundry, a deck, and optional fireplae.�.
12.33
TEL N0.
Townhomes - Singie professioaal market - Owaer Occupied
Rpr 19,95 21=35 P.05
• Six buildings of 8 units each to tota148 units
• 3 story buildings
• Each unit has attached private garage with private entrance
• 24 units iiave double cai garages; 2� units has single car garages
• 24 A units have 1480 "firushed sq, ft.; 24 units have 1240 firushed sq. ft,
• Units are priced &om a90,000-$105,000 �
• . Woodframe constructian � �
Inferior Finishes and Appliances: similar to the Rotdund "Villa" product
Exterior Materials:
• "Stone tike" base wainscote
• Brick accents
• Vinyl "lap" and pshake" siding
• Asphslt roofing
• Windows - Weathershield Visions 2000
The design of the townhomes was to create a high density, ai%rdable product, but still
offer a private garage with direct access to the unit and a private front entrance door. �`�F�
goal was to also do tlus so as no unit was above another. The density of the townhomCS Ys
appro�cima.tely 16 units per acre. The lower level is the garage entrance. The main
entrance is a mid-level between the street level and the main ievel of living space. This
allows the guest to cnake half af the one flight to the living room on the outside of the urut
and half inside the unii. This eiement also offers a 12' high space within the foyer and
more privacy to the unit. The private deck is elevated for privacy and view. Because the
patio door is not on grade as in marty townhomes, it is more secure. Security has become
more of a priority today, so to be able to drive directly into your home and close the
garage door behind you is an advantage. By having a 3-level townhomes, this allows the
living space to be on its own level and not to be shared with the garage. This allows more
opportunity for more windows. The entry foyer with its high ceiling is a great opportunity
for added glass and its hei�ht is such that the kitchen and dining space will enjoy its view.
As a comparisoq a typical B' Villa utit has l24 sq. ft. of glass. This interior'B' unit has
the potential of 190 sq, ft., which is 50% more than the UBC code requires.
It is The Rottlund Company's position that these townhomes are comparable with and in
some areas have advantages over their sister product, the Villas. The Villas have shown in
their 8 years of existance to have continued .to be well maintained, owner occupied, and
hold their value and in many cases increased in value.
12.34
TEL N0.
R�r 19,95 Z1��5 P.05
Cottages - Single Family one-atory detached towahomes - Ewpty Nester Market
- Owner Qccupied
• 26 homes
• One, level "slab on grade" plans
• Each unit�to have double car garage �
• 4 unit plans: A unit 3 bedroom - 1480 sq. ft., 2 bedroom - 1320 sq. R.
B unit 3 bedroom - 1480 sq. ft., 2 bedroom - 1320 sq. ft. �
Optional l0 x 12 4-season porch
• Units priceci from $130,000-$160,000 �
Interior Fitishes and Appliances: similar to the Rottlund "Pines" product
Exterior Materiats
• Brick accents
• Vinyl "lap" and "shake" siding
• Asphalt roofing
• Windows - Weaihershield Vision ZOUO sliders
The Cottages are placed on the site at a 30'/o angle to the street to create more private
spaces at thc entry and patio areas of each uiiit. To also reduce the amount of the most
narrow space between units. The angle also lessens the image of garage doors and allows
for some side load garages to create more variety from the street. Directly across from
the private spaces of one unit, the adjacent uriit has no windows. T'his increases the
privacy of this area.
It is anticipated that there wiU be an introduction of a 1 1/2 story plan to go along with the
original4 one level plans. This 1 1/2 story ptan will have a master bedroom on the main
level, and include a den and guest bedroom on the upper level.
There is planned 4 unit pians of which some yvill be side load garages, some with front
porches. Each plasi will have 2 elevations for a potentia! 8 different looks. Combined
with 3 color palettes, there are almost as many variations as there are units. All units are
designed to be handicap adaptable, whereby the unit is easily converted to a handicapped
accessible unit.
It is The Rottlund Company's experience that "stab on grade" construction has not and
does not create an unsafe environment during tornado condidons. As an additional safety
precaution, there is the possibility of designating an area in the undergrouad garage of the
Condominium building as an atternate shelter for those residems.
12.35
TEL N0.
RFr 19,95 21�37 F.07
Single Family Two-Story - Young Profesaiona�, Singles and Couples aad
Empty Nester Market - 4waer Occupiql
• 24 homes
• Lots approximatBly 35' x 100'
• 2-story slab on grade plans
• Each unit with a double car garage
• 3 unit plans - ranging from 1300-1600 sq. ft.
• Optional screened porch
• Units priced &om $110,000-14Q,000
Exterior Materials
• "Bt'1CjC'� BCCCritS
• Vinyl "lap" and "shake" siding
• Asphalt roofing
• Windows - Weathershietd Visions 2000 sliders
The smalt tot clusters of two-story plans are targeted toward young professionals, singles
and couples. Plans have the living space on tha main level and the sleeping spaces on the
upper level. A plan with a Mastea� Bedroom on the main ievel would attract a segment of
the empty-nester market. There is an opportunity to put living space above the garage in
the form of additional bedroom/den or "bonus" room. The homes would be 24' in width
with 11' between homes. The homes would have windows and doors on 3 sides with one
side soGd_ This creates a private space between each home. There is an opportunity for
patio space to the rear and/or the private side of the units, with the possibility of screened
porches.
With threc basic plans and two elevatioas each and optional space above the garage, there
will be extensive variety along the streetscape. As in the Cottages, there would be three
color palettes that are compatible with the total neighborhood to a11ow for individuality,
but to also continue the common thread throughout Stonegate.
12.36
■
'�'U: Weathec Shieid Manufacturing
Atm: Mr. Lya Harti
P.O. Box 309
Mtdford, WI 54451
PRO,��CT: Visions 2000
Vinyl Casement Window
�tu�r7 CIC4� Cest1[�q
ccxaorauo�
DATE:
QRa,tECr rro:
P.O. �:
sa2 Cf�wEll nveNUE
ST. PAUL, MN 55�td
PHONE 6t2l6a5.36ot
July 21. 1992
ala�0 93-20l0.9
N/A
SOUND TRANSM7SSION CLASS (STC) - ASTM: F90(90)
'1�1'['�20DUCTION:
'�his zeport presents the results of a Sound Ttansmission Ct�ss (STG� t�est coaducted on a Yisioas 2000
Vinyi Casement Window submitted by Weather Shield Manufacturing. This test was requested by Mr.
Lyn Hartl of W�ather Shieid Manufacturing on June 22, 1992 with the •testing canducted on July I6,
1992.
'�'his repoct musc not be reproducod ex,xpt in full with the approwaE of Twin City Testing. The daca in
this report retates anly to the item testod.
'Z'wi,n City Testing Corporatian has been a�ccredited by thc U.S. UepaRme�t of Commercx and the
National Tnstitute of Standards and Technoiogy {NI.ST, formeciy NBS) �der iheir Nadonaf Voluntary
L.aboiatory Accrediration Program (IWLAP� for oonducting this t�est procodure. 'rhis �report may not be
use� to claim pc�oduct eadvrsement by NVLAP or any agency of ihe U.S. Governmtnt.
�__� • __ 1 �u t�. ,� '
The STC of the sp�.cImcn dcscribod bclow was �. A tabula�r and graphir,�I prestnta6oe of the data is
pc�esented under "TFS'i'-RESULTS". .
�
12.37
�,j A MUTl1Al (MlQICCTKiN I(1 CIIQNIS. fNQ MJtk �G �f�l) OW19ClVFS. �ttl. tw�n Gt� t@Str+G COn�u►iqn a!t'O�f! �rC SVIl�� tCD �S t��f. CCK+✓aH'ntu�t ia+l7+�i ��� r l�' �� �• :�r•.
�NO MJ«+�N��2�r ioN r•nn a�Ht �CarpN cH Sur�ti�rr:i!. COnC�.uS�O�K cNt lKtri�CtqnS riro+� c� �eC���+G Ou� �E+�On�S �S �N:S�'��u �+Cw�N++ct c1u�� �vucN� vn�„» �, ^.•...:� ;.•:•
` : _ ._ _. . ..� . .
. y. � . - .� : o: � � �
A . � � .w � - � . � � � 3 .K ;
� � o o � �.
►� .r'. . N �. C . . h � O L '� � ��p
G-7 > � �, • •� «+ .0 �p
Z � � y � � N. � y � � �
(� ��� �. C O y���. s C �„�,,-'� •Q � � �. Y :
!-' C„ a: ,� R. � ' cQ � .�• ,� ' � � �.�., p :.=. ..+ � Y � •
i��� ; L: � a' ''' uf V� ld . .. �'i . V �O \ •� �'' y � , �
i � � � C � � ; .w. C'. � � � � '� • � �' �v�i .�+ ,� � `�
t; �j
� 0 � N � . �. �� � . R7 � �'. t' a+ �" V tn �' C� A � •
ja � � a � � o�_o �¢ �. o �ri � �. o � � z ' ' A � �. o .w .
a � i V �'v� � � U �� LL �. U �'� �..��, � N � ~if . o .
d
QZ o � � o �� �
� � w � .r
z V � .b � .5 ° a� � o .� .� � � �
O = •� C V.n a) 'U C� N � cw. a) w:
I.y `� � V E � O � cd af .L � � � ,� j,
E"' � a�i � � °� � � .°c � 3 � ` � o c�" .� � y
V W�] .� cv a�"i 0 v� �.. v� a�i � o a�- 3 a�
W ^] y..+ `/ � y 'Li � V� �"' �1 y O Vf �
V�/i L � � Vf ��. � N � � � •� ��.+ fA � � ���+ L Q�.
F�I � a.�+ Gr a� � �"l y � Ni � � Lr. � �'Li N ��.�+ ....:.'''. v� .i'i � Vl
W '� _ � � 4, �� � Q � �." C
E'� A � GO v�, � � ? '' � �� �� ° � e •� `� � � � °� �� o � :'' c.
z � a� � o�; � � a� ��. .r a� .� «� �° �� s y 5 c
� " �-a � � L a � � � .� ,� �. � y y � � -� � �. .
"' � �, � �•v -da� "; z �� Lv �
[..W.r i � �.� � � � r�.. �.� � v� �.� � � �'C � LL � v�i � 3
Q�
W � 'CS
z = �' �
�, o � o
�
� c
�% � o °_Q � � � �
.� � � .�
w A °�v� � ciC y °o'
W � ..�'c ,� . � �a � 3 k
�L �co�3 y « � o °'
� �„�,, .� N'�>_° o o `�' ¢
`-' O c � ���-i o �,�� -
a �-. a) v�
'..+ N �C > c�
�„�,.� �i r� •H •� � y N •� � LO �
V� N 'L7 • � O j L' > =� =� � >
F.�y r-+ �f W G �Q +-�' � C� C� �
Vi � i � O �.� � cd � i cC
�
�
�
q � a� v�
Z � .�N' �. � p N N
E"r d � L•�„ � a C� o � dyQ �, �
W A � w° .� a � o° � =v ;a a�o 0
W z " °'
w � � ��" F� i o�° ti.� o i
a �'
� � U " o °�"��3���
C� c, �� y o`n o¢.� � o 0o v�
ai •`r `� �c� � o�i�a'�i � E " N?�o'
O � 3'� a� .� a� �.�e o.
M t�i � � c�i � a� � � � � �.�', � °...' •° �.' 'H
— s
c� � � � •c � :'. '� ;? > � E o �'v,
�U A �A °'•� ".�'[.��zr� "
� � , > � .� � � � � � � � � �
o z
a �
12,38
� _' ..
�■
•
��
�
� --� �_+ ;z:-'::::
` .... � ��. _
I �:..
( ', rISSISSI�P1 STREET st'ry,RK -
S711Q7 Ip�
I H+n�sw �py S:II[I.7 tJ01T �r ON �
+ _ _ � �,,,, �- ` ,�,
,� — _ _ � -._ ... ..._.. -
� ,� isst�saPw ° e��v�-.-�,, ,� �,. . � � �� „-z----� _ - - . . _ o :
� � N " \ _ an.n �= _ s � _ .:
a - - ' _.:: t
7
�n.
2
TOW HOMES �
0
�
6' BITUM�n+0U5
��.4
i.' _� .. �
,a 1 �ur a� -'�'. -
s1 `\ s `\\ :=�= .
�' ` � -
� \ ' ' _
2�
2
` � ' CO D(
, .
, ` .
16 15 \ � _� � un
\\,` �` .
i
�� s
� `\ � � ^ �
� ���_���� �
k
' i� •. i
ti �D90 �' � PONO` __—.
—_ \ t � j �—
i � `�`� `, � ����—%� �
' �
_ ° _r-'� o_�nnoN sASn. I ! ,.. Q
,L_,_ _-_� , � �� � ,'� ,o � �. ./. q i¢
_; � � o�
� ; ,
_� . ,
; � �
-� - � y' _`� - -� � �' i
W Q
X �
1 . / � 1� N 1 2Y I/f
- f7�1�11 - --KASC�a- - - �m - �.�.,.«r a� i
.«-
,
° " � - � ° . ---s� -J;1 ! 1
_ __ � �
i �;� � : o '.
� � t� .YI
� M ���` M z� r
� In,• � � �
--- — --- --� � �— -- -- � ' 1 '
.-.,. �.
_ � � � u ..,w �� . t a.
_ • �. y� �
S A f E l l 1 T E L A N E � �91�QT IIWT !� On' i' R+Oi7[�I � I( Si�RT UCMi YT/ 1 �
� 1
� �
I
PHASE 1
o�� wesr oF �o. s�r�
FALL 1995 CONSTRUCTION
s.ia, .o.
PHA
(�va.o�o�T �►:
SPRING 1996 '
:
_. : ..-- -�----------
- --�------- - .12. . . ;�..._ ____
�� ; _ ..�-�AL1'ERNATIVE C
,:: _
��
�i .
I ' YISSIS51►►1
i
� i
1 t, I + .. _ � _
3 ' T_ —�_
i 2
� � TOW HOMES �
1 � � E m _o
� ^.
�
:
�,
� "
� � �_�, '�'� __i .-..
., j:, . ,
i�:":::�;
STIIEET _ rrru�p -.
■
,
;���'��f ��" - ���_' � _,
- �1v11-'Y` - --�ASC� - -�— ���- - �� -
� � � � - � -
_ _ _ , .
y ��� .
� . �
,
� =T,� p'
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � ( � _ _ _ _ _
S e TEl l� TE � �NE I�rOT'
�
i
I
i
PHASE 1
OEVELOPMENT WEST OF 3R0. STREEY)
. FALL 1995 CONSTRUC110N
�..� _._. ___ __..__- .__ . _
.._ _ 12�
�7 �W
,o.� smct+ uwt �r ox �
_ b, � _ �'. ... ... - ..
K� � � - . . _. .
1 1 • � O _
1.. i �
n•n ':\ ..
_ - � � \ _ ; t
` - �O w/ pr, --
[ � ���� i,:'+" .
s 'i
M� � . -
�
� i za
� , �, � 2 :
� ' `,:. �. ,� co oc
m.,
,� .� �.�. �
� �'�: , �
� ` ,, �r ,-•`
6 �
\ t � �
� ¢�\t _�,,n \' S POND -__��~— i
��,
. , ,
� ,_, �, � ��
_- OEic Tl '
'� '. �x. a
��`— ' O � r� 9 —
, ,� , I
�
,
;��
_ ( _�a �
� �
�_� N ,
_ „-.�,..�� —
� �J�(
-- ---�' �
�,o
� :, M
�� �
I S � � M
is _.no . s-as aM � ��
�- . %
Z�
. 1 II . � I SmQ7 ud�i �r PiT
�i �
Ir,
��
�
gV
�
QI
� � ,,� -
111=
,
��
PHA
(OEVELOPWENT E11
SPRING 1996
_._ . ___- �_ �y.�
ALTERNATIVE C 1
�•- .�
.�
' I
�
IYISSISS�r��
1 � /
1 \ I + _ � � /
3 z l � �
Tow HoMES 3.
0
� �.
� � 6' BINM�NWS
TR�IL
/
StREET _ r!'�ry�K
� O`1 �
I � 1v11 � - �cASC}r�- - -�— �-e�-�- - �� '
� � � �
— — ! � -
� 1;1 �
� �� �
�zo�r m�
--- — --- —J I L— -- --
' � .� � � � �
S A T E l l 1 T E l � N E I 51a[Ct uwt i4 ryn
;
I ;
� PHASE 1
OEVELOPMENT WEST OF 3R0. STREET)
I FALL 1995 CONSTRUCTION
I
�� .
�� =:":-.�.
: „=.-'.:,�, ._-
p ..e.iy„� � 57a[R I/O�� !T Oh
'-f
, �' ' � . "�.. . . ..-"
_ -�.r __ ._ _
,� . ..
� � 1 1 '�r� . ' �
,., s
�
a.. . a
�� � \ .
�O 14� pt
,t �� '�\ _ -.
S
M• � �
.��� 1 �,
� 2 .
� ' � CO Dt
,
75 , �: \ . % _� ��wr tA
\ w, '
�
6 � / �1
\ �
� � /
\ „j �
� � ��_��� �
' � O�\_ ; PONO _�� .
--_ � + : � ^
�' `� , � . � �
� � �
��
'----- oe�NnoN sas�N I �� •.,�. ,
._ � �.
/�'��.-i �- _.' r�s ._
' �r. tyj k'
^o_ 9 �6
� � ' ��
° � .
� ' �
� w �
� t �
/ � �
w' �, IR .
! � �-• N �
� � " .JtM,.%C R�` � i --
�`!�1 � i.
..a i
-- ----1 �
� ,
' � 6:1'
M :r
� i � f
i's � s ��
�-s+s ass
u• ..no ' � aw � .n
�
�� >•
r co-�ar•c"l1ll ' I I�5'"�t "�"r ar o� �—
31R(T 110�f
PHA
(o�a�orr �►.
SPRING 1996 y
_ 12.4�_. _ - - - �. - - _`.�,,
.��
y _ .-... ALTERNATIVE D I }
.. ... Hea�rtl��d:.�Rea�l�ty-�.In��estors,--�Inc. . ` : ..:: � . .
� �18O2 Nic;c�llet Av:cnue South .. . : . � • � . . . . . �
=Mini�eapoJis, Minnesota ��54Q9-256� � : .. - � - � �
• �J'elephonc`. ((12) R23-6275 . � Writer'.s Direct Dial� Number'. �
Factiimilc:. (612) 8?3-32.10 ' � � � . � �(612) 823-6275, Ext. 13 � • . .
. March .29, 1995 . . � - • - . ' .
Barbara Dacy .� . • � •
Community•Development.Di�ector Sent via fax 3/29�95 .
City of�Fridley � � . �
6431 University Avenue N.E�. . � ._
Fridley, MN 55432 � •
Re: Holly Center
Dear Barbara:
On Tuesday, March 28, 1995, we met with Scott Hickok of your ataff and Don
Jensen of Rottlund Homes to review plans and discuss the potential realignment
of the we`st entrance to Holly Center to conform with the proposed residential
development in the southwest quadrant. Based on our discusaions, we arrived at
the following conclusions:
1) We feel it wo�ild be important to align the Holly west entrance with 3rd
Street in the proposed development for safety and traffic flow considerations.
Therefore, we are flexible in a slight relocation of the existing entry and
would support moving it up to approximatel� 35 to 40 feet to the east. We feel
thia would contin�ie to accommodate access to the center for the public as well
as commercial delivery vehicles. We discussed with Scott Hickok our internal
traffic circulation and how curb cuts, etc. could be designed to maintain safety
and traffic flow. As a part of the project we would strongly encourage 4-way
stop signs at this intersection to insure safe and convenient access to both
Holly Center and the new development.
2) We would strongly oppose moving our existing entry to the west to 2nd
Street. This would make access to the center extreiaely inconvenient and would
adversely affect tenants. It wouid also make acce�s fc�r commercial delivery
vehicles (several 18-wheelers deliver to tenants) much more cumbersoare.
Unfortunately, we will not be able to attend the Planning Commission meeting on
March 29. Please feel free to use this letter to state our position if you
wish. We apologiLe for not being able to attend and would be anxious to attend
future meetings ag needed. We feel the new development is an excitinq and
positive step for Fridley and therefore, want to cooperate in any way possible.
Thank you and we look forward to hearing more about it. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call.
Very truly youra,
HEARTLAND REALTY :[NVESTORS, INC.
\ I •'� �%'I ��// µ.r
William F. Munson
12.42
�I
0
'. k _.
S,$` . � �..n��sa� ^+�� � "�,,—.� .w � =1.M ,,, ..,�`Y�.:'
��..^`a .-:':r w .�; �a.�''�t3 �� '�„-ri:.
i:.i•. �}'`
�,�_-.r� :d,- .Tt_s '.. � . � a
. � � �-S , � :.°.S'�;, f . .' :.: m.;dCt. .
� �-,:1 µ . ���
�Y . ,�.`'iy�•w�.y,��,i"an"�_,,�"'0.7;,•r?��-,=i
✓" = x �--�' "= �
} � '
�� � .�-+n � � -.� �y�� ��� , .�;":
�, T. „ � � :'-S"i����...� �� . .�:d:
�lll�]:
� - �t> �s�:�.�:
-- = c
; �' "� I
� x' , �,.
p ,,
�' � i
; i'+�_;'..Kp�q��
r
.�S '•- � +@ f� .
� ���
�4 L�'.:' ,.. r
� �1
!1:� �1�:
47�'T'��;P 1� -s J��G.� � `il
_ Y� .. - � _ ...
� � �z ; � _ �
„e:}�,- _� + _ ,
�-"r'� � . � ,� ` . , z
��' � - I-r �cz� .. . F
�A'','��+, ��i..'ta:s.� ^, _ ..,,... ��
. r 's +4t�. e ;• -
�
� '�, 4
Y
�,
,+ .'
: 4 � .ti
---- — .
�' , ,���,� �-:,
c r'���t„� ,h
�
; 3
�'t(�.-.���?;�
�t`- `�!
.� ; �.
L
��t
�i ��
�r �
�
3 , `� : < f. :''
# �} ` � _
�� 'y 4 ,s �
� �y ..
,,,� F � 4
:': S- �a.'' r,.
i.
' � :� � �
`'."��'Yl�
n L.. . � ,- � t r-�
� �
���!�.�, .:"�. _
_ �,�j��'/ �
ay 4:g ��y� � . � �� "'v'+ �'ry. $ 1. C°' ��� �./ ' �_�1�.1� ., tb � ��" ^' � l ': �I �-.: � { . l� .�
� .Y �t ,.w�t yu �IY6,f"4 - T ,y4 �'�^f �,y� ,��� �N� 'Y ..?
�^,�. ( � �� ��1• �w . �.SF ;.� ��E,J ����'��� _ y.',_� A�s' ai'�'� �F.,:. ._c,�.,,�y:�ss 2�' - . ,t . -
i ,
Z. ,�`4 _ S F y., -v ,� �? � {�' s j°.� t%,. � .r' • .r ^ 'i . Y•'.�"ys�,�,- �,, ,r .4,� k1l��S�"}:'L q. ' 1 f
T}f4` i.,'. �� 1 :: , , -:_] Y� �t. ,�t,� � � .' - r '.. , - � a ., "'k,'� u '� �- ` +,� -`�, .,
c, j .y
+ 'r,��?,4 li`. ty�,�`j��� �yja� �n �A ��. s✓l�c x y. s. �� trc', X�..{�'�� '��;: r ,� c_
��4"` 3.? �. ��It.:iS� S=�` µ � 3Y �y R.-T`V ���_ . _ i
�: � �� '? `..:'a ..r \ l �� �Tll a;ly � '� ..Y'� { , � , � � t ;sa �1 'Y » t 3 - a . ,it ;c' j . 'er'"�`_
� k= ' . � .� r '1%�t ��. �l �c �.w��� ry/,�,�,ry.' .' r ��:+ � ..y,., v `, �� . .. , ry„ .
� } �'S. L J ��y� �' '�Ga ` � � �i�if_-r �i �� f°`. � t. � � . .�� �_ L' "i
�y"•{ }}� y�
�� 1 � �� � . :��i�� � �' G � - '. � ` �� . y_ �(N4 � . � _ . '!' ._.?^
x�i r. . �.I% �,.'� . � {/ �,r��'7!' T.. we_� _ Aa�y �l� _a . _
�r'��f,, ,�. •.� � 5 .p/„',sir°j�-�_' i',�i.�;. a��`Ci :`i.t'� '''. � '"+:,-' .in�.�..:� .f'. � E °f` -, .
,,, '� r P a x z4�, �X'- - � : �. � `�` ' ' s '
�� -�.a". ' l . ,,,,} „� � _ . � � �v .� �. t � . .. . _ ,y .�; � . . � ��. •.. r � � ' . � ` . f
'E �*�-�� � , � �". f" t3' � ' '+� r ` s^� ,r . � � ..y �,o .ytf� +,. � . . . .
L ^r .S. ` jw`na-... 4�`� �x.F.�? -�'��!"� �Y . 'f ,-�,.-� S.. _.r-�'3.,.�.`"����{i . i s� . -:d'li ..�.
'��� r ' tt e � . '� .. `- ,n, . �t .a.s • `_ . y � 1:.::e- h�....��,-.� � -.e° - 3.
� 1 ✓' � Z` Y i . 1 ' 1 � # �
'� §.+ 'T �.%+4�Z"�'nb��'�^t�.i, � `1 ' - • r t � .-,,I,tj�-� � .! f'It � ,. y _ "
ti%4R.,.r �y T � ' .,ti. .�.r., i f�y t4A �,� ��..�t��'� ��--e-' _
��.y,� �,�,,, .w�`1:� �',.�1✓kr� ���J �r �y.+�.�r � a ; { ..�..� �t;T� ec-�-.t+- .,cy _+"- �.:y : �`
' y'� s."'r>X"..f3' . -u.�f�fi� ,� ::`i.�, � •'� �.1 )� Y^ C �. N- r-i � ',.4.0
�,�:� ��YyF,,. o,� ,���"i �o+.,� . ;i,�y�S�..�_�,f�,',�,� .w� - , �t� S4� +�- t wi � Y �q P} T,:'Ci, ���-" wi ..%'.'`�q �-.-r 4" A :� � ,
t�
��.7r�"r ��'�'r`� . '".✓�i'}�.Y�� � �+:�i'� �� r :✓,� ,� -� 'P . ttia. � , ' �,v 5S� . � ; '�`` ti' ":.
E w.- �y 3: , yy 'lt:..t. r , � �."� ,�. �� - �,��+ r�'` a.:R r �� ' � , �.7 � .'YrJ"'g". C � �� z �
a� � - i.�b -•• •e t. � k-a � 3'k���j K x �" � � S"� '°E '+ +kai° `'�", a,. � F.;. J �! .
a�a�'��"v-r ,,,._ .cv - - . ,«'�- . �'.s . .. 's' i�, �� � _ �_ . , . _ . ._.
�N : i -= 4. , ., � . , .MY' �,�.�°}�k". . � i� . . �G r �-. ^� ,. ��^ .p� ;� � .,� ,t Y� � r - ti � . � /:
�4#���,� �= P" '�.i�.^i`�;- � i�.c �'�t,� } -c r�x,�'j & ;� e�„ :i � �,
r tr �y
t� � _ . . _ t '� • i . `L �'Y"
� . i�l,y ~ .. . � - t �.c? ,.,�,,��. ,�p` � � { Z * j y �,� 7 , '' 3'r:i�� ' � � ,.3 ' F.� �' ' -1� p?'�'•-.:.{}`+ '��' � t� _ =
� q �i �'N . .�,- _. �M . ,�C l��'��,> � 4 � :n {Y � K i c: � - :� ' � t r .
� � �°�,+ . .. - �'�� �' �.4:x�l:. Yui��fa'.1c4� .. -..'� � . aF `'j'+t"4'�i,�� � �yi. s �,+��,., St
�, , • . - � �.> > -r '.'�` . `1' ". 1 � � i% 1c�}�5;, j 4.' +�.t r � g �, .
g�'. �t `� ��� �t f �T � ���7 t. %� A J'� ' "i ' .. � ' rf . . r f . 4
4 � �� . .. ' - � 7 i r ��,��' w 1. „ 3.Y+#' , �. '.'e. , � r^- � � J p . � D [ r. � � �+ .
g ` � _ . •�.y�' . '�j � �-;•< i � � j . J { . . .a� . ' . .
. _ . • � ;, �� . ' � � . . � � . � � . i . . � .�� .
. - . � . . ,��r,� y,� '' . L, .. � . , .. . � . " . - . . -
. • � . . : _ _ �._ . _. , :'yF � ti . , ' - � .
., �.,.:,�� �� . .� :
►i�r�ii�ii�ii��ii�iii��ii�iiiiiii�ii�iiiii���tii[�i�iiiiiitiiiii�ii�iii�iiiiiil�t�iiii��i��it�i���i�i�ii����i.����i�����i�tiiii�i��iiiiiiiii�iiii�
, . .. .. ....
, . , ,.._.,. , �
��I
�
��
13' � x ss:.x ..
«� - 15'
_._......._... __...._..._..�---._----- -----------
- ---- - ...____...--- -
�` 4' CONC. MEDIAN 12, .-------_..__ � 4�._. ._ _. _.. . ... _ . _._._ _��L��i: __ __ __ _ ...... .... __. . ._—
— _
� — —
•� �
� _ �� S TREE T �3' � � 12 4'CONC.M �
_ _
. .� 4 ��..�.._ ... .. . ... . � �� � �� � �
.� . .... . .......... �...�� ._.. ... _..�� .���......'_.. _�.��
. .... . ......... . ....'_ _�.. _ !��
� �.�._...��.�.. ...� _....� .... . ...... -
�.w�.� � � � �� �� �� � � � �
. _ 13� � ,-��____.•e'<»._ �14 _ ..! — — — — — — — —
� ._... ' '�'._, - ._l T-=' ' '
�.... - � . . � �! T l Ii �3:
. __........�.�. �..- T �.�. - ....� ..� . ... _ _ f '
' �� ' ��. _'. �� . ... . . _. "
� �.__ T . �. ... ...
� . . . �- _. ...v ..
.'._.� -�� " ' ,�` - . _..
•��.�. ...._..�� .. . . _._...-_'--�-�.._ =y
, ___ ... _.�...._,_..__��. ---L_..._
CS�
PRE
MAY I
SCALE I
�
;.
�
�
O .
� ,
�V� �� 16. ��� — __' " _' . "
1 ` \ � R O —� —�..�
�
� \ � PROPOSE STONEGATE DE PME�
� �
�
w ` ` �O ` ` �-- -
\ , ��r
� �
� y \\
/ \ ,
. — � ` t` �; ,
2.44 � � . �
.
.
� � ; r�� _
=:-�-�--
CSAH 6 RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
ROTTLUNOlFRIDLEY
PRfUMlMARY COS7 E571MA7E
DESCRIPTION GOSTNNIT QUANT7TY UNIT AMOUNT
CSAH 6
a��,e co�c cac
Remove Pipe Sewer
Remove Conc Walk
8it Sawcut
Femove Bi( Pavement
Rempve Canc Driveway
Remove Brick Pavers
Remave GtMbasin Manhole
Relocate Nydn�i
Common Extavatan
Tnttic Control fl 10%
nggregate Base CI 5
Bittxninpug Pav9mMt
Conc CdG
Median 3' Conc Walk
Const C8 Manhole
15' HCP Sewer
Stripirp
Fi�IC Survey
Sueetscape Imp�ovements
Ornamental Uqhtinp
TuA Esrablishment
Brick Pavers
4" Con[ W21k
Holly Shopping Certter
Remove Conc C&G
Common Excavation
Bit. Sawcut
fiemove Bit Pavemeni
Relocate Irrigation System
Aggregate Base CI 5
Bituminous Pevemerq
Conc C&G
Fie1d Survey
Sto�egate
Common Exeavation
Aggregate Base CI 5
Bituminous Pavement
Conc Cd�G
3' Conc Walk
17-May-9S
52.00 1,250 LF
38.00 200 lF
40.75 5,900 SF
37.50. 7,060 LF
. . S1.Q0 . 1;070 . SY
i 10.00 9p SY
50.50 1,080 SF
3200.00 3 EA
51,250.00 1 EA
32.00 800 CY
38,000.00 1 l5
5�.00 760 TON
335.00 280 TON
56.00 1,825 LF
51.50 2,120 SF
f2.500.00 3 EA
522.00 200 LF
53,500.00 t LS
52,a35.00 7 L$
Subiotal
Contingency 7 5 %
Eng & Admin 15 %
Total
54.200.00 3 EA
52.00 600 SY
33.00 2,t20 SF
Si.50 a,600 SF
Subtotal
Gorttingeoey 15 %
Eng & Admin 7 5 %
Totaf
52.00 d00 LF
52.00 260 CY
51.50 230 LF
51.00 1,450 $Y
51,000.00 7 �S
37.00 • 500 TON
035.00 270 TON
56.00 375 lG
s,,zoo.00 a �s
Subtotal
com��ye�ey � s %
Et+g & Admin 1596
Totai
f2.00 725. CY
S7•00 80 TON
535.00 50 TON
56.00 180 lF
S 1 _50 200 SF
Subtotal
Contingency 15%
�aaa��s�
Total
S 2, 500.00
f t ,600.00
Es.425.00
f 1,590.00
t1,070_00
3900.00
S 540.00
S 600.00
S 1,250.00
S 7 ,600.00
58,000.00
55,320.00
59,800.00
S 7 0.950.00
S 3,180.00
57,500.00
54.a00.00
53,500.00
S 2,a35.00
577,760.00
S 10.674.Op
a�z,z�s.io
594,109.10
S 12,600.00
S 1.200.00
56,360.00
56,900.00
327,060.00
54,059,00
Sa,667.85
535, 786.85
5 B00.00
S 520.00
5345.00
S1,a50.00
S 1.000.00
53,500.00
59,a50.00
32,150.00
s i,zoo.00
s2o,5 � S.00
f 3,077.25
53,538.Sa
527,131.09
5250.00
S 560.00
51,750.00
S 7,080.00
S 300.00
f 3,9a0.00
sss�.00
se�s.es
$5,2)0.65
Grand Total S 162,237.69
12 ��",
�
��
♦P Cpli
tit
2 �`��t
����
,,� �
+.,'-,'_' `_ � >
tiNES`�
DOUGLAS W. FISCHER, PE
Design Engineer
Jun.e 30, 1995
COU NTY OF ANOKA
Public Services Division
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
1440 BUNKER LAKE BIVD NW, ANDOVER, MINNESOTA 55304
(612) 754-3520 FAX (612) 754-3532
Ms. Barbara Dacy, AICP
Community Development D'uector
City of Frid1eY
6431 Uni�ersity Avenue NE
Fridley, NIN. 55432
RE: Southwest Quadrant Redevelopment District adjacent to CSAH 6(Mississippi St.)
Preliminary Plan Review
Dear Ms. Dacy:
The Anoka County Highway Department has reviewed preliminary submittals of the proposed
site development for the southwest quadrant area bordered b� Mississippi Street and
University Avenue. As a condition for issuing a permit for this activity on a county highway,
the following conditions will be required:
1) Com�lete raised channelization to provide for left turning movements will be
reqwred on CSAH 6 at the intersection with realigned 3rd Street. A design
as previously proposed by Anoka County and subsequently revised by the
developers consultant en�neer, BRW Inc., should be constructed in conjunction
with the access construcUon.
2) It appears that no additional right-of-way will be required to re-configure the
roadway as noted above. However, the replacement of the cit}�s sidewalk and
landscaped boulevard and lighting will requue additional easements outside of
the existing right-of-way. The exact need for additional right-of-way
should be determined with the preparation of fina.l design plans.
3) Complete site grading plans and run-off calculations must be provided for all
run-off to be collected or connected to the existing CSAH b storm sewer system.
4) It should be noted that residentialland use adjacent to highways will usually
result in complaints regarding traffic noise. Traffic noise at this location could
exceed noise standards established by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Develapment and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Anoka
County policy regarding new developments adjacent to existing county lughways
prohibrts the expenditure of lughway funds for noise mitigation measures. The
City and/or the Developer should assess the noise situadon and take any action
deemed necessary to uummize associated impacts at this site from any traffic
noise.
�2.46
Affirmative Action / qual Opportunity Employer
-2-
5) A permit for work within the county right-of-way is required and must be
obtained prior to the commencement of construction Contact
Roger Butler, Traffic Engi.neering Coordinator for this department, for fiirther
in:c� mati�n r�gart�i�g t�:, p�i ^�.�it g. cc�s�. �
These recommendadons as well as your request for county participation in the cost for these
improvements was discussed at the June 5,1995 Public Works Committee Meeting. At this
meeting the committee concurred with staff recommendations for the permitted use of CSAH
6 includin� the channelization requirement. The committee also rejected any cost
participat�on on the county's part which is consistent with similar development and permit
request actions.
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the preliminary reviews of this development
site and we appreciate your consideration and cooperation in tlus effort. If you have further
questions or need any additional information, please feel free to let me know.
Sincerely,
�
%
�
'� .
Douglas W. Fischer, PE
Design Engineer
xc: Jon G. Olson, County Engineer
xc: Jane Pemble, Traific Engineer
dmh/2CSAH6
12.47
� 1
MEMORANDUM
DATE: . ..May 17, 1995. � . : � �
TO: Barb Dacy, AICP, Fridley Community Development Director
FROM: Jeff Holstein, PE
RE: CITY OF FRIDLEY / ROTTLUND / STONEGATE REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
The following points summarize the conclusio�rs of the Stoaegate Redevelopment �Project
fraffic analyses and the comparison of the ezpected post�-development coaditions to the
existing conditions and the comparison of the proposed geometric lay.out to the Anoka
County Layout.
Summarv of Traffic Analvses and Comparison to Eristing Conditions
- The proposed 146 unit residential development is expected to signficantly reduce site
traffic generation to and from the site. The redevelopment is expected to generate
approximately 67 percent less traffic than the existing site land uses on an average weekday
(3,170 vs. 1,040), including �7 percent less vehicle trips during the AM peak hour (184 vs.
SO) and 6l percent less vehicle trips during the PM peak hour (262 vs. 103).
- Capacity analyses of the proposed relocated 3rd Street / Holly Center intersection indicate
that the intersection is expected to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS "D" or
better) through the short range traffic conditions under it's existing through/stop control.
In the long range traffic conditions (Year 2015), the outbound through and left turning
movements from 3rd Street and Holly Center are expected to operate at capacity during
the peak hours.
- A traffic signal warrant analysis conducted by Anoka County at the existing CSAH 6/
3rd Street / Holly Center intersection in August of 1994 indicated that the intersection did
not meet any of the eieven traffic signal warrant specified in the Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices. An additional analysis conducted by BRW, Inc. indicated that the
intersection would not be expected to warrant the installation of a traffic signal until at
least the long range traffic conditions.
- Queuing analyses of the proposed relocated 3rd Street / Holly Center intersection indicate
12.48
that the proposed spacing beriveen this intersection and the TH 47 intersection along
Mississippi Street should adequately accommodate the expected short and long range traffic
queues.
- The CSAH 6 intersection with 3rd Street and Holly Center currently does not provide
exclusive left turning lanes off of CSAH 6 into either of these lacations. Field observations
of :the intersection operations during the.peak .hours and accident.data.�indicat� that tfie
intersection currentty operates acceptably without exclusive left •turn lanes and would be
expected to continue to operate acceptably through the short range traffic conditions as the
volume of traffic into the 3rd Street access will be significantly reduced and the demand
into the Holly Center is expected to remain the same.
- The proposed Anoka County and BR�'V, Inc., preliminary designs for this section of
Mississippi Street (CSAH 6) both provide exclusive left turning lanes from CSAH 6 into 3rd
Street and the Holly Center. The implementation of these Irft turning lanes would result
in improved traffic operations and safety at this intersection and along this section of CSAH
6 over existing conditions. �
- The proposed num6er and types of access (i.e. fuil-movement and right in / right out) to
and from the site will be reduced by eliminating the existing right in / right out access onto
Mississippi Street and a previous but existing cur6 cut just to the east of existing 3rd Street.
These modifications �vill also result in improved traffic flow along this section of CSAH 6.
- The future ultimate design of this section of CSAH 6 ma include the consolidation of the
Holly Center access and existing 2nd Street into a single access location. Under this
scenario, the intersection may warrant the installation of a trafftc signai, based on the
reduced warrant requirements, if traffic volumes on CSAH 6 continue to gro�v and the
prevailing speed on CSAH 6 is over 40 mph. The installation of a signal at this location
would improve the side-street leve( of service at 3rd Street and Holly Center such that Holly
Center patrons, Sto�egate residents, and the neighborhood areas to the north and south
could safely and efficient[y access CSAH 6 during the peak hours. This condition would
also improve the operations along this section of CSAH 6 as it woutd result in the
elimination of another full-movement access.
Because of the geometrics to the west of existing 2nd Street (i.e. hill to go under railroad
trestle) and the future difficulties that �vould be encountered in providing an exclusive
eastbound to northbound left turn lane from CSAH 6 at this location, the future ultimate
iocation of the major intersection atong CSAH 6 should be at the proposed 3rd Street /
Holly Center access.
- 12.49
�
Comnarison of Pronosed Geometric Lavout for 3rd Street i Mississippi Street
(CSAH 6) Intersection to Anoka Countv Lavout
- The Anoka County layout �vould provide a�170 foot exclusive westbound to southbound
left turn lane from CSAH 6 into the Stonegate site by modifying the existing median and
extending it to the west. The Anoka County layout also proposes to widen the east
approach of the intersection along the south side to maintain the eaisting 28 foot of width
for the rivo eastbound through lanes. Tlze BRW, Inc., layout proposes to incorporate
all of t/rese same items into its' design.
- The Anoka County layout provides approximately 72 feet of width on the west approach
of the relocated CSAH 6/ 3rd Street / Holly Center intersection. This 72 feet includes 13
foot and 12 foot westbou.nd through lanes, a four foot raised concrete median, a 13 foot
exclusive left turn lane and hvo 15 foot eastbound through lanes.� -
TI:e BRW, Inc., layout proposes to provide 67 feet of widtl: on tlie west approacl: of tl:e
intersectioi:. Tlre 67 feet ►vill be comprised of 13 foot and 12 foot westbound througl: lanes,
a four foot raised conerete median, a 13 foot exclusive left turn lcri:e aiid 12 foot and 13 foot
eastbound through lanes.
Recent discussions with Anoka County staff indicate that the 12 foot and 13 foot eastbound
through lanes will be acceptable.
- The Anoka County layout proposes to provide a 120 foot left turn storage bay for the
east6ound to northbound left turn into Holly Center. T/re BRW design proposes tJ:e same.
- TI:e BRW proposed eigJtt foot widening along t/:e soutlt side oJ' tlte west approac/i of tl:e
intersection wrll be tapered back into exuting CSAH 6 to the west by using a(27:1) taper.
Tliis eig/:t foot ofjset i.s in addition to the existing niiie foot offset along tlre soutli side created
during t/:e previous reconstruction of CSAH 6. TI:e proposed 27:1 taper will end just east of
the existing wall for the railroad underpass. T{:e desireable taper would be at speed limit to
one or 35:1 in t/iis case. T/te application of tlie 35:1 taper would result in modifications to tlte
wall of t/re underpass and/or a substandard sideiva[k widtli for approximatety 13S feet.
However, t/:e proposed 27:1 taper would not be noticably different t1:an tl:e 35:1 taper and
would be expected to operate acceptably.
Tlte proposed taper wil! extend a distance oj approximately 580 feet (I7 feet (8+9) @ 27:1 +
120 foot storage) to t/:e west from the existing centerline of 3rd Street
12.50
B R W INC.
riaz,�,;,,g
r���waa�
Engineering
Urban Design
Thresher Square
�oo n�►ra sc��r so.
Minneapolis,
Mrr s.�is
612/370-0700
Fax 612/370-1378
Denver
Milwaukee
Minneapolis
Oriando
Phcenix
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Memorandum
April 19, 1995
Barbara Dacy, AICP, Fridley Community Development Director
Don Jensen, Rottlund Homes
, Jeff Holstein, PE
"Final" Traffic Analysis of Proposed Rottlund Homes "Stonegate"
Redevelopment Site in Fridley, Minnesota
The purpose of this memorandum is to update, amend and finalize the March
8, 1995, "Draft" traffic analysis technical memorandum for the proposed
Rottlund Homes site in Fridley, Miruzesota. The memorandum is divided into
two parts. The first part describes the general assumptions and results of the
"Draft" technical memorandum. The second part describes the site plan
revisions and the conclusions of the finalized traffic analysis.
Assumptions/Results of "Draft" Analysis
Portland The March 8, 1995, "Draft" technical memorandum analyzed the expected
San Diego traffic impacts associated with the redevelopment of the subject site via a
Seattle particular site plan. The site ptan exhibited various characteristics relative to
land use type, location and intensity and accessibility to the surrounding
roadway system.
The site plan analyzed in the "Draft" analysis consisted of 28 single family
residential units and 144 condominium/townhome units for a total of 172
units. The site plan also proposed two access locations off of Mississippi
Street; one full-movement access off-set approximately 120 feet to the east of
the current Holly Center access intersection and one right in/right out access
further to the west, roughly opposite existing 2nd Street.
The analyses conducted for the "Draft" technical memorandum iricluded
capacity analyses of the Mississippi Street intersections with TH 47, the Holly
Center Access and the proposed 3rd Street access; traffic signal wanant
analyses of the Holly Center and proposed 3rd Street access Iocations using
Warrant 11 (Peak Hour Volume) of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MMUTCD); and queuing analyses of the short and long
range traffic conditions on the west approach of the Mississippi Street/TH 47
intersection to ensure adequate spacing between TH 47 and the proposed 3rd
Street location. 12.51
Bazbara Dacy
Don Jensen
April 19, 1995
Page 2
The general conclusion of the "Draft" traffic analysis was that the proposed site
plan land usage and access should result in acceptable traffic operations under
through/stop control and that the intersection spacing between proposed 3rd
Street and TH 47 should be adequate to accommodate both the expected short
and long range traffic conditions along Mississippi Street. However, although
the proposed off-set intersection was expected to operate at an acceptable level,
it was suggested that a single standard four-legged intersection sixnilar to the
existing conditions would be more desirable.
Revisions/Conclusions of "Final" Analysis
The revised site plan consists of 50 single family residential units and 96
condominium/townhome units for a total of 146 units (261ess units than the
"Draft" analysis). The expected traffic generation from these land uses is
estimated as 1,040 daily vehicle trips, including 80 AM peak hour trips and 103
PM peak hour trips. This traffic generation is slightly less than the generation
estimated in the "Draft" analysis (1,110 daily, 86 AM and 109 PM) and
substantially less than the existing site generation.
The revised site plan also proposes to relocate the existing 3rd Street/Holly
Center intersection on Mississippi Street roughly 40 feet to the east. This
would eliminate the off-set conditions proposed in the "Draft" site plan. The
revised site plan also proposes to eliminate the right in/right out access from
the site to/from Mississippi Street. Therefore, the revised site plan is
proposing to provide less access to Mississippi Street than both the "Draft" site
plan and the existing conditions, which both provide two access drives
to/from the site.
The capacity, queuing and signal warrant analyses were updated to refle�t the
revised site plan conditions. The following conclusions list the results of these
analyses and of those analyses which were unchanged from the "Draft"
memorandum.
The existing traffic generation from the site (excluding the Rice
Plaza and Dairy Queen businesses which have recently been
demolished) is estimated as approximately 3,170 daily vehicle trips,
including 184 AM peak hour trips and 262 PM peak hour trips.
• The expected future traffic generation to and from the site via the
revised site plan is anticipated as roughly 1,040 daily vehicle trips,
including 80 AM peak hour trips and 103 PM peak hour trips.
12.52
Barbaza Dacy
Don Jensen
April 19, 1995
Page 3
The expected future PM peak hour inbound traffic to the site is
estimated as 67 vehicle trips. This is slightly less than the 71 trips
estimated in the "Draft" analysis and significantly less than the
existing 146 PM peak hour inbound trip total.
The proposed 146 unit residential development is expected to
significantly reduce site traffic generation to and from the site. The
redevelopment is expected to generate approximately 67 percent .
less traffic than the existing site land uses on an average weekday,
including 57 percent less vehicle trips during the AM peak hour
and 61 percent less vehicle trips during the PM peak hour.
The proposed number and types of access (i.e. full-movement, right
in/right out) to and hom the site will be reduced by eliminating
the existing right in/right out access on to Mississippi Street. The
geometrics and traffic control of the access drives will be similar to
the existing access drives. However, the proposed relocation of the
3rd Street/Holly Center access, approximately 40 feet to the east,
will need to be approved by Anoka County, as they have
jurisdictional controi over Mississippi Street (CSAH 6).
Capacity analyses indicate that the Mississippi Street intersections
with TH 47 and Holly Center/3rd Street currently operate at
acceptable levels of seroice (LOS "D" or t+etter) during both the AM
and PM peak hours.
Capacity analyses of the proposed short-range (Year 199� traffic
conditions indicate that the Mississippi Street Intersections with TH
47 and Holly Center/3rd Street are expected to operate at
acceptable levels of service (LOS "D" or better) during the AM and
PM peak hours.
Capacity analyses of the proposed long-range (Year 2015) traffic
conditions indicate that the Mississippi Street/TH 47 intersection is
expected to operate at failure (LOS "F") during the PM peak hour.
However, the long-range background conditions at this intersection
during the PM peak hour indicate that the congestion is expected
to be mainly attributed to other development along TH 47 and not
the subject redevelopment project.
Long-range capacity analyses of the Mississippi Street/Holly
Center/3rd Street intersection indicate that the outbound left
turning movements are expected to operate at capacity during the
year 2015 pm peak hour. However, the unsignalized procedures of
the 1985 Hi hwa a aci i M� are typically conservative.
Barbara Dacy
Don Jensen
April 19, 1995
Page 4
Field observations of other similar sites (i.e., unsignalized
intersections located adjacent to a signalized intersection) have
indicated that the actual levels of operations are usually indicative
of LOS "C" or "D" condirions.
A recent (August 1994) traffic signal warrant analysis conducted by
Anoka County indicated that the Mississippi Street (CSAH 6)/
Holly Center/3rd Street intersection does not cunently warrant the
installation of a traEfic signal.
• A signal warrant analysis using Warrant 11 of the MMUTCD and
the long-range traffic forecasts indicated that the Mississippi
Street/Holly Center/3rd Street intersection is not expected to
warrant the installation of a traffic signal by the Year 2015.
Queuing analyses indicate that the proposed 580 feet
(approximately) of storage distance between the Mississippi Street
intersections with TH 47 and relocated Holly Center/3rd Street
should be adequate to accommodate the expected short and long-
range traffic demands.
Mississippi Street (Anoka CSAH 6) is a minor arterial roadway.
The primary function of an arterial roadway is to move through
traffic. As such, most of the state and county highway
departments have developed minimum intersection spacing
guidelines to limit access to selected consolidated locations. Most
of these agencies try to limit signalized intersections along arterial
roadways to 1/4 mile spacing and intermediate unsignalized
intersections to 1/S mile spacing. Discussions with Anoka County
indicate that their current desirable minimum spacing guidelines
for minor arterials such as CSAH 6 is 900 feet.
The proposed (cl/cl) spacing between TH 47 and the proposed
relocated Holly Centerl3rd Street intersection is roughly 650 feet,
which is less than both the 1/8 mile (660 feet) typical standard for
intermediate intersections and the 900 foot desirable Anoka County
minimum. This compares to the existing spacing between TH 47
and Holly Center/3rd Street of approximately 690 feet (cl/cl),
which is greater than the 1/8 mile standard spacing guideline, but
less than the current desirable Anoka County guideline.
The existing sight distance at the Mississippi Street/Holly
Center/3rd Street intersection appears to be approximately 10 to 12
seconds to the west, where the roadway dips to go under a
railroad overpass.12ert�ndard traffic engineering rule of thumb
4
Barbara Dacy
Don Jensen
April 19, 1995
Page 5
for intersection sight distance is 10 seconds. Therefore, the sight
distance at his location appears to be adequate. However, any
future relocation of this driveway to the west under unsignalized
conditions would appear undesirable at this time based on cursory
review of the sight distance.
The e�cisting site provides a right in/right out access approximately
175 feet from the TH 47/Mississippi Street intersection. The
proposed redevelopment project proposes to eliminate this access.
This should improve the traffic operations on the west approach of
the TH 47/Mississippi Street intersection by eliminating the
condition where exiting vehicles weave across three lanes of traffic
to access the left turning lane. .
12.55
R(YT'TLUND HOMF.�"'
A DMS10N OE THE ROTI'I.UND COMPANY, ING
May �, 1995
Bill Wazden
Metro Division, NInDOT
1� 00 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN �5113
Re: Stonegate
Dear Bill;
Per our conversation on Friday I am enclosing plans for our proposed development located
in Fridley which is tentatively called "Stonegate". The City desires that we conta.ct MnDOT to
obtain a pernut to change the existing chain link fence along University Avenue to a more
decorative metal fence. Per our discussions, we will agree to install the fence approximately 1 foot
behind the property line, with our understauding to MnDOT that the ornamental fence would
replace the need for a chain link fence for the properry line and that MnDOT would not, in the
future, be coming back and installing a replacement chain link fence. We will also be looking to
insta.11 and connect utilities, provided that they don't contribute any further storm drainage than had
previously existed into the e�cisting pipework in the MnDOT roadway.
Lastly, we will inform the City of Fridley that they should contact 11�In.DOT regazding the
opening of an emergency access at Satellite Lane and University Avenue for a temporary
connection while the developmerrt is under construction for new roadwa_ys. This temporary
connection would be for the fire department only and would be signed accordingly, such that anv
other vehicles using it would subject the openin� to a closure and Rottlund or the City would need
to find a substitute route into the neighborhood from the South while roads aze under construction
in the development. This request would come from the City to MnDOT and, per our discussions,
is something that I�InDOT would seriously consider granting on the one tune basis only.
Bill, thanks again for the working relationship. We look forwazd to securing permits with
you in the ne:ct few months, with the appropriate information attached.
Sincerely,
a
I �2� '%�.X.�.—�
Donald Jensen, SA
Land Development Manager
The Rottlund Company, Inc.
DJ/am
Enc.
12.56 � �
2G8t LONG LAKE ROAD ROSEVILLE. �iN 55t 13 (6121638-0500 FAX (612) 638-0501
���"SOTq
'�
�
�F �
May 15, 1995
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge Building
1500 West Counry Road B2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Barbara Dacy
Community Development Director
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley MN 55432-4383
Dear Barbara Da:,y:
SUBJECT: Stonegate
Preliminary Plat Review P/95-028
Southwest quadrant of TH 47 & CSAH 6—Mississippi St.
Fridley, Anoka County
CS 0205
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the Stonegate
preliminary plat in compliance with Minnesota Statute 505.03, subd. 2, Plats. I apologize
for the delay in responding to this proposal and your inquiries. I've answered your questions
first, in the order you asked them. Following those are our general comments regazding the
proposal.
Mn/DOT does not have as built plans for Trunk Highway 47 showing existing
utilities. The owners of in-place utilities must be contacted for locational information,
2. Removal and replacement of the chain link fence with a decorative type including
stone pillars is acceptable to Mn/DOT provided it is placed an appropriate distance
from the highway to protect motorists. A fence of this type located as close to the
highway as the existing fence presents a greatly increased risk of injury as a result of
striking rigid iron and stone. We recommend that such a fence be placed 28 feet
from the edge of the traveled road as an absolute minimum. Twenty-eight feet is the
standard for provision of a safety or clear zone based on the site conditions at this
location and the proposed structure. In addition to increasing the hazard potential,
failure to observe the accepted standards for provision of a clear zone may be a
liability issue, Placement of a iron and stone fence will not be allowed within
Mn/DOT right of way. Questions regarding safety and liability issues may be
directed to Mike Schadegg of our Traffic Studies unit at 797-3126.
3. Temporary, emergency vehicle access from TH 47 to Satellite Lane is possible.
Approval of temporary access will be contingent on strict limitation of its use to
emergency vehicles only. Any other use, by construction vehicles or the general
public for instance, will necessitate its closure.
An Equal O p? 5? Employer
Barbara dacy
May 15, 1995
Page two
4. Approved Mn/DOT permits will be necessary to proceed with items 2 and 3. Bill
Warden, of our permits section will coordinate permit review. He may be contacted
at 582-1443 for information regarding the permit process.
5. The plat boundary is not consistent with Trunk Highway 47 right of way. Attached is
a copy of the right of way map for this location and a copy of sheet C 1 from the
proposal documents showing TH 47 right of way in red. Questions regarding right of
way documentation may be directed to Phil Keen at 582-1283.
6. The plans indicate that existing drainage patterns will be perpetuated. Any changes in
drainage to 'Tbi 47 right of way and its stormwater system should be reviewed by
Mn/DOT. Changes in existing drainage patterns and volumes discharged to TH 47
may require a Mn/DOT drainage permit. Questions may be directed to Gene Bovey
of our Hydraulics section at 779-5053.
7. Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between
land use and highways. Residential land use adjacent to highways will usually result
in complaints about traffic noise.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has established noise standards and the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development also has guidelines. Traffic noise
from this highway could exceed noise standards established by these agencies.
Mn/DOT policy regarding new developments adjacent to existing highways prohibits
the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures. The developer
should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the
impact of any trafiic noise.
If you have any questions regarding this review please contact me at 582-1386.
Sincerely,
��
�������
Cyrus utson
Transportation Planner
Attachments
c: Jon Olson, Anoka County Engineer
Sldp Anderson, Anoka County Surveyor
12.58
_. __.�__. ----- . _.._. ._ ..
( -�� ��--- ; `- --. -- � .Q .r � � :
n
` � I � ' � � ' ' � i I ! i i ! � � N. 9j j � ! - . ..
,� � � E � p X� X' ki X {� ..
°a y �,� ' a'� � ' i I'� � i � � � 'O� -g _�t _Q� ��� ��I I . .
� - � . � � . ' � � � � ' i k; tl' tn v! _ � c1,
1 I , � ` � �' � J � ' � , ! I I �_._.. ..
� i i � $ � . 1I � ' � i I . . {
1 � ,/�� I
i ( :
IlI I �,071 (� •��� f,� 2 I+�' .)' '' j Z � .
j � .27' j tl 1 �� � � y�� � . Z'..
�( QI I i.(. •� �. � � e0' t-- �' �' �; 1.�.�
i���' �`i � � � , ����}��� � ��
� �. , s F. � a. E ,
., _
? � 'I �" • ; �� a� � a• � , A
�, I . � � � . ., �� � _ ,
�
. I . y � , ,
�` ; , � �; : _ _� :�.-.� .., . _•;- �---._.._.� �
� � I � �
�j I�;` <
t \ ��. � ( � �..
a ' \ �� .. .. � �,. . , � �
O;� . ... , }: . � • + �
/•..'. '�. -a.„ . 3, i . / I ; ^
,� ; . +. . =� � ' . � `,�" } a z
f � .r. . t �..�
.. � ���t1 , � �
n ; 'r`.. . ^ . /; ....�.� t . 'O�\ I � v
� � � ' N \ � � ,W ; V � j;, • �:� � �J , �
� i w' � � �� � �+ 1 � i �i
y � � '� •,` �` �� , , � I �
°� ���� \j�Q���� � �� 1 a�.' � �— 1 1
h � ' � '� �` 'r'� f� j' � �
A�4}\:��7 X� `. � �
' � y � V V' � \ � • �` �� I
� " ,I� " .� , :� � �- '`��' \ .� f ...' , �
, L � � . Z ��:a � �`l� G {. I I i:�
;\ ,� % (� • � ± + � ,
' t� .�� ����. 4v ��; es k \ J' i 7 I L z
o + , . ., k. � ,; . Y � �' � , � �:
e I' j � `.�' a s
, ; � � � �
� : ' ',�:: r ' ., ; . � � Q z.
� I; �;� ., � "� �\, '� / � - � i `.
z: � � �!l b� ��� s
�, � � � _ r ;
3 i � ,'�, r �\'��� ,�� � > , �',` -;' , •
�. � ` ,�- � ,1 •,X. , . (
� �` � , .�I, 1� , I. �` , � ,` . �' ;' ` �
�'. � ; f t �.. � `.� � . \ �� I
' ' I o a `-� � .ir � I
�C ! _ �v-%-- � � i.� � \ - t - -
c: ,"( / . x � ` ^ '�'� •` • � \ - �
�' � i . �'�� '" \\ �'
. , •.k , : �-�' � � � �Y �
m � r • ' i � � k
F �'•� k - ,�r; � _ \ � - �
',• / : \ ;t !` \ _� � ... 1� . � .
� �.
,, , �
. � ~
.
.. . ,
, .
.
� ,
� ` •
\ � x �� .��. � � ...°- - �� - - � / - °---�- - � - --- -�
_ 7��� _s •f _ ,Z�,k, '� :• S
^ `' ' Z
,_ ��; , `� „ . • � I �.�
� � ,� _ � - �
� ^ \ \ �`. �. ��,_N. \k'' t `. �
M ''r �� . �'. . : ., ` '\
M ��+ � �.' � j , � �� ,'�k.. ����,,� ��� ` .k�� � •�
^' ' � I � °d C �•j,• � �� �- `'�
o j ` a� � , , � ; �
ti � ;� � / :
�, � � � � � . ,� ,
N ���1 , g.r, ,. ,.>a:
10 O (' p� � .. �' 1i / i J f! 'V
H O � a � � � �,����
. 1 , � , . � „',;,�a
-- - --- 12.59
�:-.. ��, -
�M�ssissippi -
� � . ��� �� .
� . . . . -
� ...' �
� . �
�
;-
�
._ ._.__-L
- ' .—�
�
\. . �
� :_
� i' �. �
-� • .
• ' . =
►
, ..� �
-'� - - -
�--
i� �,� � �, `
' � \ �+t►;
� = �
, .��__� � �''�c�
�_ Z r ��� (
r�i� .
.-k•a � � 4.� Ci �dl���
' � -
r �► ��� �
, `` \J���.
.��
� • �� I
' � �
i�
� �'_�
\J\
J'
�-�.�
� ��
- ' \
. /
;
�
Site Entrance - �lan �
. - � c�.P�,� • � _ � , p�i _
1260
i .
;..__
�. �
;
w,
I '
: .
,I 1,,�
�4
�I�
0
� �-r+�� �r
��''�� -
. �
� . � � Site Ent��nce - � i�ian .
-- . __, . _ _ . .. _ . - --- -- . . - _ c�� . :1� = , v , p, �. � : .. � ----
. �
. - G�' �I�l`� W�-1- �{lirt+ . o�`lAM�CfA�
. ,. �J�c-'f ID!�?TI �Ic�'t1�1 � . . : i�-�s -
� �� �+�1 E
1
��' , �
i
/� � \� \ � ' ` ' . "
�_� � T�-.. .� �-` _ � _ � �v
- t . . .
� _ - _ - �_. � � 1 � _ � '���� � - _ .
�. J� � v "'��' �• � 't � ' � �
� . /� \. ���7 � -' - -- --�_ A % ii
� '
� rl :- } <
---- -"'- _i _.., t�
�
� �
`�trance - Elevation
���= io'-o�
•-r •-_ _ ___._ . .._ ___ _- -- - - _.
�M �T�- �1.0+�`���!'�Ko
�
-�Nwi�-/ f��N�- F�.oWt�S :`
12.61
Rottl�
�R, ��
�
' ' • . f �...
. � . . ,,
� :CIT� �OF FR[D[:EY . � . . . _ . . . . .- . . : . . - .. �, s�
. � • � �'ry$�.'z��.
. . ♦ ' : ..-� .. . • . +�'�+Ya �.
• � . : _ �G4�'1 UNI'�E[tSiTY AVL(�IUEN:Ei �'• � . . . . - . . . . .. ...
�F�'i�:. ..
: • . . ..FRIDGEY;.I�fN ��432��. . _ �_ � . : � : � � " . �.. - : - • � � . ; : .. � . . . . : � : *.
• - :. - (612)'571-3•454. . � . .� � C.QMMUNITY�DEVE�.OPMENT DEPAR�'MENT � :_ ��: .••'-' � . . -
. •: . . . . . � . � ��. �� � R�ZONING��-.����'L3CA'I`��1� -.FO�I� �: �--: . .: . :.: . .._ .
- .. ..- � . . . .: . .- . .. . -. . . : � -.
�. . - : ' PR�OPERTY-:I�TF`OR1�ATidN .- site�plan required for.su�binittal; see:a�taalied_� � � . �
. . . .
- . • �. . Address: . :. . . - - . _ _ . -
- —. - .- _.._ _.
Property Identification Number (PIN) �
L.egal description: �� d�G�t � pVDVIG�Ce( �D(•/ ��
� Lot Black Tract/Addition
Current zoning: __ -�' AMa� ( ''3 Square footage�acreage � i�" �cF.Y'�s • -' : :��� � �.
�Y �A
� Requesting zoning: S-2 � c '= ' � � �. � . �
Reason for re�oning .Y - -, ; - g :
- -�:� _r a `
, ,�
- : . _ ,:. . , ..
.. Have ou o rated a business in a cit�� which }ypw�/�.uired a b in � . . :=� �_�.
us lice . 3
Y ess nse..
� . u, .. ,. .
�J x s.
1 • 1
♦
R
Yes �. No If yes, which city7;���jP��7u_h_� �/Q�/�'�f�%� �.� .- .
:�
If yes, what type of business? .�Jt�L ( ��t/ � �/A.� � �'I(�� � -
Was that license ever denied or revoked? Yes No �_ .
.
...
FEE OWNER INFORMATION (as it appears on the property title). --
(Contract Purchasers: Fee Owners must sign this form prior to processing) _- .
NAME_ �,( d� �V'I � -}�'�
ADDRESS _ _ _ _: .
� : .�. �
. _ DAYTIMEPHONE �,. _
, _ .�,�.,a
Y
SIGNATURE . . .' , � �:. DATE � . _ - . . �,
. . _ �� � - . .
PETITIONER INFORMATION � � "3 - �
_
-
.�
NAME - . . �
. . � � . ,K .-Y� .
ADDRESS ' -
. . . r"� .� r 'Y' ty... f'4 .��i, y
V! IIQ - � � �p � ✓-f % DA.YITMEPHONE �- _ � ' -'� .5
, �. ... y (�v� �✓ Gv �� ,k
t
SIGNATURE " ,;� � ` "� �DATE�/�ilNr �` { ` � �� "" �
` . •
_ . . - . ,., �: � � ;
� 1,r�� �
,r. ^ �; ',�y,.,, ± ?�.'� , -;� r i:
� .�L �� ,�
Fee: SS00.00 S �� z ,� ,�
� � • ....
, _ k ` ", x s a . , ,a : w,, r..- ,, . �
. . t� x...,; c. z. �r
. .... ,. .�
. ..
� � '� -
. . � �.
. .
. . ♦ . . . . .!N '�L� ��Y ..
iA . . . "3 �1 . . . !i � . ''i't . S . .. �L. �f f L �.
P - -
ermit ZOA �� � � t �. �; , �.. . � .
.. # q .. .�. _
I� . . � , � �-.,�#;,:f ...�;...:o-,..�.. . . ,.._ ._.�_��.,.�.,
y �. .. � . . � . .._ . .. _ . � � � � .�,kC iL� - M . �, .
� �f .n A � :u r��. �,> aw. .y-.. c •r �.:,, d�+,� � "n �� - <'
� '�L` ;+� .PP ,c�tionreceived by: . �..: -���:� ����.�����.r�- � �:��"�
,; �, « �
�y`� . }�f Scheduled Planiung Co iori;date.�� ° � �,. ` ,�'. � .� ° ` '���.�,�,g��" - i ;�� ::
�
, . � �. _ , � � �
��� �n` SC�1�U1C(1 Cltj/ COi1i1C11 �1tC.���r � � _
, b � ° ?' �t�i�� '.L
� ti
- . r nr�Jt.Y l�a� .,,w�la`1 S .r � � i � �,t�: a�uryf• W :r��y4t�i�`�"�Sr. �k ,.:�:..
��!' i .. i � ..�.r'.�ry �r.3 +'` � i°'���"W�'�' �"w�y��»e,1,��P tl"{r`'�"� � � ,�r,��.
�; . . „� � �.. �A+f.� r,.r- ,k � .'r. ti,. -�5�.. t r t ;
. . +, '.l!^.. f� . �J:�C9'...
. . - . - . . � �� i � J: r � 1ZP r'�.. . y j �Ll .� � y µ • �
. $ .� •
•
� � �
.. . . .. , ...... ; _ ..�_ ._. �„!,' -•Y7�• '. ' � f�•}��. .. lO�.�x" . •S�. +r , r .
� � � � � , . , . �� � . . � � . . - _ � . . . .
Maximum Spa�ing Recommendations Acom Style '
Area of Use
Watta elPole Hei ht Recreation Residential Commercial
High Performance /100W/15FT SOFT 65FT SOFT
70W/15FT SOFT 25FT ZOFT'
100W/15FT 60FT 40F'r 25FT'
15QW/15FT 75FT : � . . . . - -'50FT . . . _. �� � - --- -- _ •-.�--�-i
'Use different wattage/Pole combinatiorts or fixture types fo� better lighting
`!'� `; `_ _; _�; Denotes best recommendation
Price List
Light Cost
Designer
70 Watt Acom
100 Watt Acom
150 Watt Acom
100 HP Acom
Pole
15 FT. Fberglass
15 FT. Aluminum
Mast Arm
2 Fxture
�687.00
669.00
670.00
1,050.00
1,354.00
1,300.00
364.00
ease .
Pre-cast Concrete . � 550.00
Screw-In 6" 332.00
Po►ycarbonate tenses are available in
� both clear and white. .
�
� Northem Siates Power Company 6�93 2M � Princed on recycted paper
at4 Nicoilet Mall �� t0% post-consumerwaste
Minneapolis. MN 55401
12.63
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The purpose of the vacation application is to vacate the existing drainage and utility
easements in the redevelopmerrt project area, to vacate the right-of-way for the frorrtage road
north of Satellite Lane to Mississippi Street, and to vacate the 3rd Street right-of-way just north
of Sateli'�te Lane.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
All utility companies have been contacted regarding ttie proposed vacation request. The
companies have been advised that Rottlund is processing a simultaneous development
request to constn.ict condominiums and townhomes on the parcel. All utilities will be required
to be installed underground. Minnegasco has requested retention of an e�asemerrt along
University Avenue to retain access to a 12 inch gas main.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request to the City Council with the
following stipulations:
1. Rottlund Homes Inc. shall record any utility easements as requested by the utility
companies, either on the plat or by separate document.
2. Compliance with the stipulations of rezoning request, ZOA #95-01, and plat request, P.S.
#95-01.
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends that the City Councif table the hearing to August 14, 1995 in conjunction
with the other applications. Any public comments should be recorded.
12.64
Vacation Request, SAV #95-02
Rottlund Homes, inc.
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT SITE ANALYSIS
Existi�g Easements
Existing easemerrts were recorcied as part of the original Syivan Hills Plats 5, 6, 7, and 8. Easemerrts
on the property are as fo(lows:
1. A six foot drainage and utility easement on the west and north lot lines of Lot 1, Block 1,
Sylvan Hills Plat 8.
2. A ten foot drainage and utility easement along the west line of Lot �, Block 1, Sylvan Hiils Plat
6.
3. A ten foot drainage and utility e�asement (ocated beiween Lot 1, Btock 1, Sytvan Hilis Ptat 6 and
Lot 1, Biock 1, Sylvan Hills Piat 7(this was originally recorded as part of the Sylvan Hiils Plat
5 plat).
4. Two ten foot drainage and utility easements along the north lot line of Lot 2, Block 1, Sylvan
Hills Plat 6, and the south lot line of Lot 1, Block 1, Sylvan Hills Plat 6.
5. NSP has a ten foot wide easement (recorded as Document #285903 and #283795) running
east/west across Lot 1, Block 1, Sylvan Hills Plat 8 and Lot 2, Block 1, Sytvan Hiils Ptat 6).
All ovefiead utility lines will be removed as part of the demolition process. NSP has been contacted
to G1uit Claim the NSP easements to the Fridley HRA.
Street Rights-of-Way
There are two public street rights-of-way proposed to be vacated as part of this request. The right-of-
way for the frontage road north of Satellite Lane to Mississippi Street is proposed to be vacated, and
the small stub of 3rd Street just north of Satellite Lane is also proposed to be vacated. Any utility
lines in the vicinity of these rights-of-way will either be abandoned, removed, or utilized as part of the
developmerrt plan.
PLANNING COMMtSSiON RECOMMENDATfON:
New easements and rights-of-way will be platted as part of the plat request. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of vacation request, SAV #95-02, subject to the foflowing
stipulations:
1. Rottlund Homes Inc. shall record any utility easements as requested by the util'ity companies,
either on the plat or by separate documerrt.
2. Compliance with the stipulations of rezoning request, ZOA #95-01, and plat request, P.S. #95-
01.
12.65
Vacation Request, SAV #95-02
Rottlund Homes, Inc.
Page 3
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the City Council table the public he�aring on this item to August 14, 1995.
12,66
��0
Y�
��
`� �
i� I
r
�
m
0
% V V • V V
i; � 0° 1 s� �� ��95�LL
� r�i• � ttlund Homes I
'TI. � � —
v
�� � : � °
� � ��� r x
-- _ . � -�li .� _� ir,
w e � � » L
' �` ! I . I ' � m t ��
GO • �� ' � ` � � ' �p
q � �.
�� o � + .� , � � � � � w
� a s • = " x � � � I �'�
� • r � � � � !� .
•� � � - � � S � �
� � q i0'A. b rn �
� °1 � x � Z ' :
�' � � � � � N
� � l� �
� g � J
_ � �
� •fOiIILt S � �j �P
W
O a
b h
�► a �" 1�tf.I .7 �. � ~
� C�p � � �,� » �`l y � � �
� •�.s � �
a
I � O �� ,r r � ~ � ,
i v A�j '' � tA w �.M... ` � A R A � S$"
� y
s �� � •.
� ._ a �. �.� •� . !
� � b � � . ,�.�•
� � � i
r ,
!, s1DS�eis � —�
I ° -" W
om
, o C?t
� n z
� '� � Z m � �
� C"� e� ' o�� n I•
q�� � r
� "�` V I 1 v� u' Z � G
� a, D m
� N w aD*. � I
�"�� � , a ' o m �
Y � �� I� � � x
R � � �: � I Y � I �
� Y Y I, x �
�I �~� N�� y � � a
I � y� s1.1 p a � �
h • 1
� , t. �,,,e �
e
� VACATED SEMENT �s.s ���
M 238234 �
v � � A R A(i S 3�
146.40 ° °
.
• :.• -..
x , o �
••.• s9.so ''
°° N �C � � � �x a , »
m� Y .� ; . N� 00 1 3 20 E
o, I
� m ° � � � . 12.67 a ;
o � —� x
SAV �� 9 5-02
Rottlund Homes Inc
... . ,
.
. .. . . ,, . , .- .:: :_ „ ,,�
,,,. , . . . ::.. . . :.:: , . .
PL�TTED � � { i� ��> .�_ -� .� �:�� .� —
MEASURED: �: �...:�. :.�. � � � � �,:. � _ � ; �
.. ..u� �.}. ( ,x �/� �C) �C;*) �fry�
..�.1*y =,:�"a�'l�', a� 4 yy,� .wP �hi(.�tl'� �r T4�: '4��1.f'4. � ..���RJ'�°���?5F ��/ �'.1 ��� � :� r-�".�'�9 H�..�rl Yi' T/,:�.'I
' � t. ' t°' , ry_ � . -
d � � F �� .i - .�4 #� ..' s+b , k �.1 f . }..""�� , �. _ d ,_
'7�" �"M,,�, g�,t8e•�,t�- �E'�����,�.-�4-y'1�1. � n� �#�.— � .. ,y.c� +i:rn- .s+�i�C J`ec� :_'`� :.._ '� � Y '"' �-K—�r . � .. � :t^a.r
�.y..* a���M�.`'s !� 4'xr y°,,.�' � , "..e s�'".0 °+'�3 r
^" w.4 ��'T�`� C. �� �." "a'� ''!t £� LS��` i 4. ..STRFETy G�SGw�C7•Td-LW �'' � �.j�-�88 � a7. 4;T ��„ •-`�� �� ��.�
"'.'• - .. .. x ?�''., r*`� '".` "�1°f�* .iea �e:,tf;�.-- .� t �{ .�.��, . �, r � WS
.... _ _...�. .. . ..�. . .. , . � . . _ _ _
,. . . _.... . , � -
� . . . .. - . . ..�� . �:. . . .. .,. ._ . _;: _.. _ _ -
:. .. . . . �, �: . � - _ .. . �. . -r<�.
. . -.. . � ..� � - 7 .- w �. . �- . _.�
1RT OF 7. 2 9
� BOOK �� , N 8 7° 1 3
:H � f ES EASEMENT .�
j � _
=OLLOWS -
43.58 FEET _- �, .
I'ERL Y� L/ NE +� L � T � �
58 FEET : •
l STANCE OF � �
JCE NOR THERL Y �l' j (
JORTH LtNE OF � a
�55 FEET TO THE � �
FEEr THEREOF ALSO = I I
�S :
4 WITH
�RTHERL Y AND
!ON OF THE SERVlCE
TENSEON OF THE
T OF THE FOREGOING
q S T ` i r�E OF SA 1 D
TH Tr1E EA � TERL Y
�I� A T 5. idH i CN L I ES
��U7'H' � i NE OF L OT 3.
`lE GF �0� �. BLOCK �
�s5o.00
�
_
N
M
�
0
O
4
�
�aP�ACF /Rpv
01.=�
T►� ��
�
>
�
�
�
��
<
�
�
W
w
r
�
_
�
�
.
w
�
i
<
ol
�— -_---� �
�
I � � r K t I
B � � � K 1
�
S �;" � �' f1 .�`i
H . , , ,�.
i L �
�"� L �� T
i�
IW
�.
�
��
.
!�
�
I
i i
EASEMENT #3 .
�
�
12.68 �
1�k
----
f� I L L � � G�
� SAV 4�9$-�2 J Y, L V
�3'L Rottlu d Homes Inc
r a
�� o P L Q T
s:. o N
� O "
��'m�, �
M
� I � �
M � /� 0
V w
« °° ° NSP EASEMENTS
� ale
� I 0 �z a� .o °'s ° N 8 c
� pp ti rta....a ia�. c t, �� ���� " E�K.`c � d�ld.
T' "
L�'• - x -,,.r-----
s.a-- — a��.r o
�. o e• o I 0 •
• � GARAGE�S h � � G A
I I a
�s. s � � ' � d EaSEMENT #4 = _
ZQ I° I ' o o, BL�
� � N I N °�
i� rar NN lo -
647.0
o � �
w
p �a . (n '�
.:� U
a �' •
M > '" �
�
N
s. s...
� s s . s t • �,,,;� • � . O
! l 8 5 � I o +I 1 0 1
.
� 1/? 3T. BR. � O :� 1/? 3T. F
A P T. B L D O. I APT . BLDC
iss.s �, Z ��•�
as�r. � x . r
M s+� . , a+e. s ''
,�,,E� I # e�++. o � e• cm. � !
`1 °' �wr. � � �� � e+�. c °''"�.� �r • �wr. 0 2� •
� • � O t1' Gf. I c' G�. r* �.i � `� d'�
j�' 6�1�. d � � '�
t
�8 21.90 165.12 � N 89°52'l4"
�
� �.� N 89°52' 14" E °'t.' a+:.e • d*�� ars.r
I! T � .�.�
�« .n°"
�
dfl.3
�
�. ri � i/ .
TOr I�dJT
d47. 27
.O �
Y
� �rr 7cr
e�.�
�
•s
12.69
.�
�,
SAV ��95-02
Rottlund Homes Inc
����Y�IC�T� O� S�����
�j` O R C lT `Y U F \= l�. � D�. C;,1
KURTH SURVEYINQ lNC,
1 HEREHY CERTIhY TMAT TMIS itwVEY. Pc.,W oA REI�p T - �oo] �tr'PEN►oN iT.�N.E.
YAt PNEPNtW dY MY OR WOEq YY OIRECT�!'it111 C41.41�ItliA Ittl4fit. 1N. »�]!
APD 71'IAT 1/W A OIfTERED lMp pR I�F� laiZ1 7��-i7�Y FAX 1s19! 7��-7�0]
' t ATE Y
- DATE 3� � ( 9� ��.v• 3�3 t95
M t NNE SOTA RE(3 I TR f ON NO .��� scnLE t•- 3 0•
O � I RON h1pNl�lENT
1-`. o-_.� 3.�� v � t� � 1
,��.�o�..
�.UT �} �
s
u a�°yc�'oo" �r
� o:
a ,i
Q. ,
,�
.
I_ U _i" � rr' ,-" �
,
Q
Q
0
�
' �' � �j �J
, ,;-
_ ,
,,
C��.oc►� 1 , % i ;-� o
;
r�� � �` � I- �
S�ILV/�,� o: (�.
� o / ,; � �
K � ��� � �' / � �J , .
Pt�A� � � / � � - , o
� a �/ ,; a
� a � ; y� ,,
o / , �� ,; �
� .,
�� �
, ;
_ �90 � �. � /
� U'
v J
O �
J -
a�
�
_" Z
� r
�" � d
a�
� � a
�-�`�°� ��a�
T=ZO�U�
�
�.- � � ----�
't = "2..0 • O O i' � �
1Z=Z�J•02... � / i
1_,.= 3l •43 ----- ,
t / � �uT ��w1� , l.�T �
i
� ' Q � \O`.c'� S � �1�,00'• �
S89° �r0 40 �C ; , o `—� , � .• — �
�� � �
�o��-� L,►��, ,_�-� � THIRD STRE
ET RQW
° S ��,1 � � � � �r- � L..._ � N c I
�
' �_ S`� � V/�.. i� 1-� 1 1.._ � S
12.70
T� L A � �{
.
� r e�e�ai
' Q' � �✓' SAV �� -
.�' � yp�Y �'
�. �„� Ro t t d�Iome s nc
/ � � �i M �
/ '
! r �i
''' � � x I
/' � �
!IV• �� �
I � � »�, r�,,�..�xr=- -� w ' �• • . , - X .
• � .. . _ :
.: ��?''i�, ��� ` _ - -
� � _ ��. :
��Yp,�y_ , -�..�
'�` ' �.:x ' �=�'.�i�Tw�ar 'R��.'�.l��.r _,�.,•..i:_:'ib� :R ... �'.-: .'°i'..-3.+r
T��`, �
_ - �OOES , ,
'j r; -� x�
i� ��.,,._,,;�; ;r..�,r •�. � �i#
��� ��§ � _ :.1..-�J��! ti •!�!� ��' � t � � r 4 'v �h t
♦ c .�. +M � „1.�:' _ !ft 2 tr . • ♦ �.s�:
� .1 . -+s, , a � a ,� r iiF.v ..,
f.4.'�� - �"}dF8!-'L'i.
.,� : • -. . , '-- - � .
.� r.. s., .;:aa•� � t�.. �,,.t�i
'�`` i���� - f'Y �!
. ,. , . - ^ . . ,c,.:. �.., . • _. .. ... ,.. � -. _ - � . . . :.. .,.._ � _ _. _
_., . .: �. _ L'.,;..
w _,. ., _>.:. , .� • '. '� `_ iW ��4
� � . , � : ; � 's a` �IV. die.4 e�.J
w` t .
g � � � : :e,,,,� . t:�. _ ��...._ ���� - ��
� • � :�,� � - . .�= ..�. �� � �
Y �:: • •, ,:
.
�� ��
. i
. •i .
s.► ,
. .S1a'UL
I
'ao .
. :: �F
. �• .
.
.
.: ..
. • ... ... . . . ...........
.. .. . _ ..
. . . . ...
. : . . . ..
i
. .
...
� � � _ _. . ..; •
iL _ $;. _ erwi+o��s ' :. ' - Z :. .- =r-�----: : �. -
� 3. : ��,-�� _ �. __ t: - � - . � -.• .�_ •�'..�'
_ � . . :.
l a a �
•
.
vNc
�_� �S A
cs�: .. P
►. .� . . . _
I� �
_ k
� . O' �{ - �tT.:i.�• f � �. �•...
� � ,, / u�, _ _ � d � .• -: ,�
', ' N � i / uJ • .. •i � • •" �
� / � W �, � • • �•?�T'�� �
, o � ''�' r � 21A ~ � � •' ,�:• ; �
� N 1� � ~ i •-p � r, ' r' . . ' ' • R • . �. . Q,�G. : 1�
� � NO s• ',i �� �90i�S-
i � � 4p,3 '. •
� ` O '/�. ;�� • ,
' 45' 41 " � �T �� T eQ3�B ' -
6.03 r e�+.�9 r °��a __------ ,
�f- �;� �: D N 89'45' 41 y "- -� 25.37 � - s. :. ; , al
^� �' __T T �62f7 � �
' i:::� � •�0.00 1 _� p STREET T��,,, +�
� 68•56' 0" — P R 0 PV ASC A T I 0 N "�'•� ' '�' I�
./ � • � �
,�—� , --- s e8�, 2� �,��E r s�z n ►
�-!:'�� :.� i= --- .._-;_;: 1�—. .G�i'_ �
,�•. . .. • . . T�i� �
•�N � �
'f20 . — I a ! �
� �� � FRONTAGE ROAD �=88°24� 3a�� �� - �
L=61.72 N I
� . . • .
,......� ................ �• LJ PEOE5TIIL BBLS x � �
� � w/VACUUAA x B6L6 g pe12' 19"W ...•
0.50 ..�: :::..•.. �
� � ertu�o�n r.- I
�: . N.�........... j ° N � ` x
..� � ^ . w��t � .
F � b'
OON�E � � $I �
❑ pEDESil1l, � L3 • �
�....... ..._........... . :
, ��,� � � -_
� .
,
� r er�.�Y ` �:-�
�- -
�►a . e��s= !
ers � ��• I
I `� . . , `` ti � ,'
i
'�-., �, ��.� �.71 � ° ��. . �
� ,� :.;:.: ._,_.. . . . .-�---.-. . '�--� ,
��� _. 81TWr0��5 .:' � ��'� 1 � V � 95 Q DECI I
� � � � t lunc�Iomes Inc
•'�'� I � �� �
:: ` '
.�� ':' ; � •Q
' � asl.? . . 3 � �
. � � �c','Y �� � = " "
; �f.f �-..,1 •�12 �; �_ '� ■
;: � a
� � fi\ •�; • .... . ( � 7,,
STEEL OOLl�6 "'" �� '�• • y �
i'�.f E"$�il$� TiP. . �,-� ���- � � � �
:• ; � ; •.; ,
:; •� em,,,NOUS ..s. ; ���� a
�j e��s� � '� ~�S ...
�' r e��.z� r e��.� •�� W
�" r e�»>
�
a
T� f.31 T d� f?7 � B6
, w ,x .
; �m s' �o- q �
� � :� s� e
� ��"" T �6' L2J ' I
;' M M �; y � O �
, �� � a
r �.
��+� ; •:::,. s `
� T�1. lD T Qd � 1� • �.
r .. I �
�, ::� � , � � 1
� � s
�' Mo aurr�x s»
� Ex �
I. � ' � E" �
�' �', . . .'� . , , . �'>S�1.' � . � z
' � O
, •: , a I
� '!.* y wt� � � � i � �
t q i �D � I
.1 '�` � T atf.Qi ~ fi I
� � BtTU1lIOl�4 ' �S ` �
r � 1 s
�� � :
FRONTAGE ROAD
w T ��� � � _
� �
.---�'.�,�- " _ _
_ . - �.,s.�. _ � _
: � ._ .�
.:
. e-so�oz• ooM _ ; , `
� ' : _ r eaau. r eMa� _ ,
L�31.41 -
�� r T= ��
�. ----�... �.
— . �—
I�;. � 220.36 �' r ;
�.
� ,.
�.A;;r �. �. � ._ - - .t - ..
. _
� .,. _. . .,.. 4 . .
.,�i?a'Y - .'.£" ,�+'t:.'�5�'knc� b.:rt.:� . R.:*`.i..'�wvt... •..:y"" ...-. i;,.'".:... ' w . .�.,. • 1. � _ 5 .
1�''2�F�F.sd�§A^ }�u- d+r ac � �. �- - �� ' = � :r. .:b . � ` �
i � t i��4 :�'teR�e -.�'�f�� w��I � �i� �.SY6 �Ttn
�#� i�" f 'Y y +i b .nI � 'e'i 'Y.�v�-i �' � � . . Y � M � ��j � `
M � w �
- � j .. a .� ati ��/�I` . ,i, a � . ��» � '.: - ;Z w ' ys � i�� . �
�•' "c � : ,r.�"r �s5ra ?4�+ * ` ..rr a ti � ��,��� '
� , �.._� .
'� .,�:5"�,.., Y. .. �,� �:ss;�i `*'ad��,. _�� „� i .:tw �.Rn- � � - � i Y. �
�
� .. :.�i� .:. . _Y':;": -�... w . "c �*Ft£-.,, r.4., � . .: . .; ¢ . . -
' .. '" .P _u.� * .: :_., . �. �' -
. �
. � i " -' �' '� .��� k .': , ", i '4 _ .... . t'ii ' L . � .
�
-..
�
� ... ,. . .. ..... ��;. �
.:
A�
..-
.
..� � , � : �- .::. r{,• . .. ,:.- , . .�: � . ..��.- . , . ... .: . �_. ="i. _ �NC .,�Yt+,�.k.y. 3f T;W?'r .
,# � � ,�,.. Y t� �
z .y `,, . ,.."., .. "�1, .: .�..�:. ' ' . �.�. . � � ° 4� i! H�. �. 1 �. � �C �t �:
� . . � � . .. . . . &. '�it 'S YT'::Y'P 3 � � .
� . .
� •
,
,
,
- - 12.7 �
►
�inne9rasco�
A l�+Ifl�t�M ENERGY COMPANY
April 25, 1995
Barbara Dacy, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Fridley
6431 University Avenue N.E.
Fridley, NIN. 55432-4384
RE: Street Vacation of University Avenue Frontage Road,
North of Satellite Lane and South of Mississippi Street
Dear Ms. Dacy:
With reference to the proposed street vacation mentioned above, Minnegasco does have an existing
12 inch natural gas main in that portion of the frontage road proposed to be vacated.
Since this gas main is an important part of our distribution system for this area and supplies gas ma.ins
to the East and West ofMississippi Street, we must strongly object to this proposed vacation unless
suitable easement rights are reserved to Minnegasco, pursuant to MSA 160.29.
Please reserve an easement to Minnegasco, created by and within the document establishin�
the street vacation and filed with the Anoka County Recorders office, over all of the area
proposed street vacation:
We may consider removing our objection should the petitioner wish to reimburse Minnegasco the cost
of relocating the existing gas main. To discuss this and other options that may be available, please have
the getitioner contact Rick Pilon, Senior Administration Engineer at 321-5426.
Thank you for the advance notice and please send me a copy of the final action on this proposed
vacation.
Sincerely,
/ �- a�,�'
.��
Steven Von Bargen
Real Estate Specialist
Minnegasco
700 West Linden Avenue 12�73
P.O. Box 1165
i�Iinneapo(is, �IN :i:i4t0-1165
��---------____ _---�
;�L
� Zrv —lS3S 1
�i/ -1{-3Fr(O r
----- ----- --- --. __------------�-. ,.!
r �
�
I
Community Development Department
PLa�rrG D�sroN
City of Fridley
DATE: July 20, 1995 �
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager��
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott J. Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Home Depot USA, Inc. Rezoning Request
As a follow-up to the July 10, 1995 City Council meeting, I have
prepared an issue and response list.
ISSUE: Councilmember Ann Bolkcom requested that Home Depot
prepare weekend traffic data, particularly for 53rd and
61st Avenues.
RESPONSE: The traffic consulting firm of Barton Aschman Associates,
Inc. has prepared an additional study that focuses on the
weekend traffic that currently exists and the additional
traffic that can be expected by the Home Depot
development. The additional study revealed the following
conclusions:
-- The existing Saturday peak hour volumes are
less than the weekday A.M. and P.M. peak
hours.
-- Al1 traffic counts for post-development
alternative scenarios, with the exception of
the Industrial Use Only scenario will be
greatest during the Saturday peak hour.
-- All alternative scenarios with the exception
of the industrial/commercial mix have a total
post-development traffic count that is less on
Saturday than either weekday peak hour.
Therefore, the higher generated volumes during
the Saturday peak hour are more than offset by
the associated reduction in existing
(background) traffic volumes relative to the
weekday.
-- Saturday peak hour levels of service for the
intersections will be equal to or superior to
13.01
Home Depot Update
July 20, 1995
PAQE 2
those reported for the weekday P.M. peak hour
time in the July 6, 1995 memorandum. Although
some of the development scenarios may decrease
the level of service at certain intersections
(relative to existing conditions), the change
would not be significant enough to warrant
corrective action.
-- The evaluation of traffic impacts should be
based upon the weekday P.M. peak hour as that
period that represents the worst-case time
period.
ISSUE: Councilmember Ann Bolkcom would also like the traffic
consultants to advise as to the cost and scope of study
, that would enable us to determine the advantages for
creating a special signalization at the northbound ramp
from I-694 and University Avenue.
RESPONSE: Staff discussed this issue with Greg Gaides, Barton
Aschman Associates, Inc. and Greg's firm assisted staff
in determining who the MnDot contact will be for this
study. Bob Vasek has been identified as the MnDot
representative who will be our contact for the study.
Gaides estimates the study will take approximately two
months and may cost as much as $20,000.00. Early
discussions with Scott McBride indicate that they would
not be opposed to having this I-694 ramp study completed.
Mr. McBride has submitted a letter of confirmation.
ISSUE: Councilmember Dennis Schneider reiterated Councilmember
Ann Bolkcom's request far weekend traffic counts and
projected counts by hour. He also wants us to prepare
data for weekends with the commercial/industrial mix
scenario.
RESPONSE: Staff discussed this issue with Greg Gaides, Barton
Aschman Associates, Inc. and Greg's firm has prepared
this information (see conclusions above).
ISSUE: Councilmember Nancy Jorgenson wanted to know if we had
heard anything from the Metropolitan Council on their
review of the proposed Home Depot change to our
comprehensive plan.
RESPONSE: On the 12th working day after submission, the
Metropolitan Council responded that they needed
additional information. That information has been
provided. For additional detail please refer to the
13.02
Home Depot Update
July 20, 1995
PAa$ 3
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Repert in this packet.
ISSUE: Cauncilmember Dennis Schneider suggested that we set up
a meetinq with the neighborhood impacted by the Home
Depot project. Councilmember Ann Bolkcom indicated that
she would 2ike an evening meeting scheduled, and she
would work with Barbara Dacy and/or Scott Hickok to set
it up.
RESPONSE: A meeting was held on Tuesday, July 18, 1995 at 7:00 P.M.
32 residents attended from neighborhoods both north and
south of I-694. Notices were sent to all those who had
signed the petition submitted at the July 10, 1995 City
Council Meeting. Additional notices were sent to al�
residents on 53rd Avenue N.E. and 61st Avenue N.E.,
between University Avenue and Main Street.
-- Staff provided an introduction to the development
process and provided a brief description of each of
the 5 Home Depot petitions under consideration.
-- Tim Platt, Home Depot USA, Inc., Real Estate
Manager, presented a description of their request
and indicated that he appreciated the turn-out by
the neighborhood. Platt addressed questions
regarding traffic and indicated that they have
committed to a stipulation to provide the traffic
improvements necessary to mitigate the impacts of
the Home Depot Development.
- Specifically, Mr. Platt indicated that:
- He believes a left turn lane is
necessary on 57th Avenue N.E. to
eliminate conflicts as motorists try
to turn into Stewart Anderson's,
McDonald's, Holiday Plus, etc. Mr.
Platt emphasized that the success of
his store depends, in part, on the
ease of accessing the site. Platt
indicated that Home Depot is willing
to make that improvement. The County
and City would collaborate with Home
Depot on the design specifics. A
response about this issue, from the
County, is forthcoming.
- Mr. Platt also stated that a
signalized intersection at 57th
13.03
Home Depot Update
July 20, 1995
PAG$ 4
Avenue N.E. and Main Street has been
identified as a potential necessity.
Home Depot will supply the
improvements. Additional
impact/warrant studies may be
required prior to installation.
Coordination with staff and Anoka
County will be essential.
Other areas of concern discussed by residents included:
additional weekend traffic at 53rd and 61st; child
safety/traffic issues; short-cuts throuqh neighborhoods
by Home Depot customers and trucks; benefits to the City;
Hourly wage; and Hours of operation.
There were people who voiced support for the project as
well as those who voiced concern.
Overall, staff believes the meeting went very well, and
that the residents appreciated the additional
information. Though the "new'� Barton Aschman study was
not available at the meeting, a copy was sent out to each
of the attendees on Thursday. A small number of
residents have called staff since the neighborhood
meeting to ask for additional information regarding
traffic study findings, other possible uses for the site
and Home Depot's building schedule.
ISSUE: Councilmember Bolkcom requested that staff investigate
the potential of bringing a road over from Main Street to
East River Road.
RESPONSE: Staff evaluated potential street locations. A
determination was made that the best route is that which
aligns with: existing building footprints, general
development, and existing signalization. That alignment
is at 61st Avenue. Once a location was determined, staff
contacted Jim Hill, MnDot Bridge Specialist. Mr. Hill
indicated that a 23' clearance is necessary for rail
below a bridge.
Mr. Hill also stated that a 100' bridge deck with an 80'
incline from each direction would be necessary. The cost
for a bridge meeting the necessary specifications is
estimated to be between $1,014,000.00 and $1,100,000.00.
Obviously, additional signalization and associated street
improvements will increase this price.
RECOMMBNDED ACTION:
Should the City Council approve first reading of the
13.04
Home Depot Update
July 20, 1995
PAQE 5
ordinance, please consider the following stipulations:
1. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required if
this 14.5 acre parcel is to be rezoned. All fees
related to processing the amendment will be borne
by the petitioner.
2. The materials of the landscape plan shall be
reviewed and approved by staff prior to
installation.
3. The banding and color scheme shall be consistent on
all building faces.
4. Customer information/directional siqnage and
striping will be required in accordance with the
Home Depot Site Plan dated April 27, 1995.
5. A reqnest for three variances would be required to
be processed, and a decision of the Fridley City
Council rendered prior to fabrication and
installation of a sign larger than 80 s.f.
6. The petitioner shall provide verification of
approval of the storm water management plan from
The Minnesota Department of Transportation and the
Six Cities Watershed District.
7. Calculations must be provided and drainage
modifications must be completed on the plan prior
to the May 3, 1995, Planning Commission Meeting.
8. A drainage easement must be acquired by the
petitioner to allow excess run-off to drain on the
property to the west.
9. All pond slopes shall be designed with a minimum
3:1 interior slope in accordance with the grading
and drainage plans dated April 19, 1995.
10. Pond capacity calculations shall be provided prior
to the May 3, 1995, Planning Commission Meeting.
(These have been submitted as requested)
11. The petitioner shall comply with all requirements
of the Anoka County Engineering Department.
12. A semi-traffic circulation plan shall be indicated
on the site plan with the modified access location
as required by the Anoka County Traffic Engineering
13.05
Home Depot Update
July 20, 1995
PAQ$ 6
Department.
13. The large commercial vehicle circulation route
shall be clearly marked through the use of
informational signs once the site develops.
14. The Petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of
the traffic improvements necessary to accommodate
the traffic generated by the development including
signalization o� other improvements as determined
by Anoka County,_or MnDot now or in the future.
,�5. All Home Depot deliveries (to and from the store)
-sha11 onlv utilize t�e deliverv route of 57th
Avenue N.E. to University Avenue.
13.06
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCB TO AMEND THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY
OF FRIDLBY� MINNESOTA BY MAR=NG A CiiANGE IN
ZONING DISTRICTS
The Council of the City of Fridley does ordain as follows:
SECTION l. Appendix D of the City Code of Fridley is amended
as hereinafter indicated.
Be and is hereby rezoned subject to stipulations
adopted at the City Council meeting of
SECTION 2. �The tract or area within the County of Ar�oka and
the City of Fridley and described as:
Tract A, Registered Land Survey #130, generally
located north of I-694 and east of East River Road
on Main Street.
Is hereby designated to be in the Zoned District
C-3 (General Shopping Center).
SECTION 3. That the Zoning Administrator is directed to
change the official zoning map to show said tract
or area to be rezoned from Zoned District C-2
(General Business) and M-2 (Heavy Industrial) to
C-3 {General Shopping Center).
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
THIS DAY OF , 1995.
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
Public Hearing: June 12, 1995
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication:
13.07
ia�:i������=7
1. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required if this 14.5
acre parcel is to be rezoned. All fees related to processing
the amendment will be born by the petitioner.
2. The materials of the landscape plan shall be reviewed and
approved by staff prior to installation.
3. The banding and color scheme shall be consistent on all
building faces.
4. Customer information/directional siqnage and stripinq will be
required in accordance with the Home Depot Site Plan dated
April 27, 1995.
5. A request for three variances would be required to be
processed, and a decision of the Fridley City Council rendered
prior to fabrication and installation of a sign larqer than 80
s.f.
6. The petitioner shall provide verification of approval of the
storm water manaqement plan from The Minnesota Department of
Transportation and the Six Cities Watershed District.
7. Calculations must be provided and drainage modifications must
be completed on the plan prior to the May 3, 1995, Planning
Commission Meeting.
8. A drainage easement must be acquired by the petitioner to
allow excess run-off to drain on the property to the west.
9. All pond slopes shall be designed with a minimum 3:l interior
slope in accordance with the grading and drainage plans dated
April 27, 1995.
10. Pond capacity calculations shall be provided prior to the May
3, 1995, Planning Commission Meeting. (These have been
submitted as requested)
11. The petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Anoka
County Enqineering Department.
12. A semi-traffic circulation plan shall be indicated on the site
plan with the modified access location as required by the
Anoka County Traffic Engineering Department.
13. The larqe commercial vehicle circulation route shall be
clearly marked through the use of informational signs once the
site develops.
14. The Petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of the
traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic
13.08
Exhibit A, ZOA #95-04
PAGE 2
qenerated by the development includinq siqnalization of other
improvements as determined by Anoka County or MnDot now or in
the future.
15. All Home Depot deliveries (to and from the store) shall onlv
utilize the deliverv route of 57th Avenue N.E. to Universitv
Avenue.
13.09
612 332 6180
li;-;.'0:9i 1�:18 F.�LT 61� 31� 613�i B�RTO�-�SCH,�L��
BAATON-ASCHMAN :��`AFSCIN„TH�.'�:}i��RTATIbfV;»_UF'l;(iMpqp�Y
�art�n-Aschman A;sociat�S, �nc.
t 1 1 TJiir�i A.vanue Souih, SuitP 350 • MinnF•aUnlis, tilinnesota S�a�1 U5A •{o"t2) 332-0421 • Fax: (612) 332-glgp
MEMO�tA,NDUM TO:
FI�tOM:
DATE:
S'(.TB�CT:
E�ECU7'NE SUMMAR.Y
Todd 1V�osher, Greenberg Farrow
Greg Gaides
July 20, 1995
Saturday p�al� Hour Analysis of Home Depot in T'ricuey, MN
�402� f119
A traf�ic analysi,s was conducted for th� proposed Home Depat development in Fridlep,
l�innesota. Previous a�aalysis for the �veekday A.M. and P.M, peak hours was documented in
a July 6, 1995 techr�uical memorandum. The focus of this study was to determine whether
tra#£c volumes assaciated with i;he proposed development would, during the peak hour of
tra.ffic on Saturday, exceed those of the weekday peak hour. Saturdap peak hotxr trip
generation of the proposed Home Depot develapment, along wxih trip generation for
�lternative development scenarios, was de�ermined �nd the trip5 were assigxt,ed to the
surrouz�ding street net�cvork. The following conclusions were made concerning the Satuxday
peak hour 3nalysis:
• �xisting Saturday peak hour tr�c volumes are less tha.n the weekday AM. and
P.M, peak hours. �
The amount oftrips generated by the altern.ative c�evelopment scenarios will be
greatest dux�ix�� the Saturday peak hour except for the Ixidustrial Use Or,Iy scenario.
_. ' With the e�ception of �I�e Tndustri.aUCommercial iVlix scenario, the total pos�-
�;;;�� development traff"ic for each scenario �vill be less o� Saturday than aithex weekday
peak howr, Thus, the k�agher site generated volumes during the Saturday pealc hour
are more than. offset by �ie associated reductzon i.n existi.ng {background) traffic
volumes relative to th
e weekda .
� y
The Saturday peak houx levels of service for the intersections will be equal ar
su�erior to those reported fox the weebday P.MI. peak hour time perigd in the July 6
technical memorandum. Aithough soxne of the development scex�arios may decrease
t�ie lev�l af service at certain intersectians (relative to exist�x�.g canditions). the
change would not be significant to warxant corrective action (e.g., change from �,evel
of Service B to Level of Service C).
• The evaluatian of traffic impacis should be based upon the weekday P.1V1, peak hour
as that period represez�ts the worst-case time period.
=� 13.10
� PARSONS An Equal Opporlunity Empioyer
61'? �32 6180
�i':�u:9S 1�:19 F.�LT 61� �3� u150 B�RTO�-�SCH�1�1� �100�-019
INTR.Q�YJCTION
Home bepat USA, Tnc. proposes to develop a site located in FYidley, Minnesota. The site is
approximately 14.5 acres and is surraunded by 57th Avenue NE to the north, Main Street to
the east, I-fi94 to the south, and Burlington Northern� Railroad to th� tivest. The proposed
site development wo�.rld include a 103,004 square foot Home Depot store alangside an
unspeci�'ied retail de�relopment cansisting of 26,600 square feet. Access to the site would be
parovided via two driveways along Main Street. One driveway would be located opposite 57th
Avenue NE and the athex between 420 and 560 feet to ihe south.
The site is currez�tly zoned as heavy industry (M-2) on tl�e norihern haif and general
business (C-2} on tha southern half: The proposed Hame Depot development would require a
change in zolliIIg (entire site would be general shopping or C-3).
'z'he purpose o� this memorandum is to suxnmari2e the traffic analysis conducted for the
Saturday pealc hour of iraf�c. The impact analysis for the weekday A..M. and P.M. peak
houxs af traffic under the prapased decelopment and alternative development scenarios was
dacumented in a July 6, 2995 technical memorandum.
�ACKG�iC.C3UND ANY3 METHODOY,OGY
A traffi,c impact ar�alysis for a proposed development shauld be performed for the peak
period c,f trafFc activity �vithin the study area. Typical analysis pexiods include the morning
and evening rush hours {.A,.M. 3nd P.1Z. peak hours, respectively). Depending upon the type
of development, a Saturday pealt hour an.alysis may also be desirable.
The approach used 'zn ihis study was to deteimine whether the Saturd.ay peak hour post-
deve2opment trai�c volumes would exceed those of the weekday peak hour. Where the
Saturday volumes exceed the weekday geak hour, add2tional analysis �vould be necessary.
In cases where the Saturday volumes would be less than the weekday peak hour, the Ievel of
sexvice results would be no worse than those reported in the July 6 technic�l memorand.um.
Traffic volzune data w as collected to establish Saturday baseline volumes and to determine
when the peak hour occurs. The expected Saturday peak hour trip generation of the
development scenarios was then determined using the most recent ediiion o� the ITE 2'rip
Generation Manual. This manuai is ihe standard source £or txip generation rates for various
development types and has been used tbroughout the �revious an.alyses.
E�CST�NC CONDI'.CIUNS
Fiaure 1 shaws the surrounding street system and the corresponding average annual daily
traffi.c volunnes. Traf�`ic on the residential streets range from 3,000 to 4,604 vehicles per day
(vpcU. The volumes are typical �'or local streets. Based on txaf�ic voltune data collected, it
was determined that tl�e peak hour of trafiic on Saturday occurred from 12:30 P.M. to 1:30
P.M. Figure 2 shorvs the tuxzung movement volumes for the Saturday peak hour. �`igure 3
i�.lustrates the taro-way tra�c voiumes at selected locations wvithin the study area for the
;,lj�
Sattzrday pea.k hour and waekday A.M. and P.NL peak houxs. As Figvre 3 ivadicates,
�''��'� Saturday peak hour ti-afiic �rolumes are less than the weekday AM. and P.M. peak hours.
(,.(Y�
2
13.11
h12 332 61a0
Or ::.'��� 9S 1�:19 F:11 ul� 31� til�tl B�RTO\—:�5�_H�I��
SATURDAY P�AK HOiT�t T�.IP GENERATION
�o��� �ui�
Table 1 summarizes the estunated trip gez�eration of the proposed Home ]aepot development
along with the alternative developmex�t scenarios for the Saturday peak haur. Zt alsa
�:;��;u, pravides a comparisan againsi the weekday AM. and P.M. peak hours, previo�xsly shown in
the July 6 techndcal memorandum. As Table 1 indicates, trip generation will be highest
durin; the Saturday peak hovr for eveYy scenario except Industarial Use Only.
TABLE i
PEAK HOY.TR TR.IP GENEF.ATiON C01�IPARISON BY DEVELOPVIENT SCENAR.IO
Saturday Peak Hour Weekday A.M. Peak �iour Weekday P.M. Peak �Tour
Developnxent Scenario
Trips In/Out Trips In/Out Trips In/Out
Existing o o�a 4 0/0 0 Q/0
(N'o Development)
Industrial Use OnIy IQQ 51/49 358 326I32 350 lOb/24�
IndustriaUCommercial 1,707 1,032/675 274 2Q0/74 52b 283f237
Mi;c
Home Jaepot Only 405 2061199 200 133/67 325 X53/172
Home Depat with �45 276/269 215 14Q/75 395 1$8/207
Retail (I�'o Outlet}
Certain reductions (e.g., shared trips and pass-by trips) were made to the trip generation
� totals for specific development scenarios listea in Table 1. Shared trips account for shogpers
who make a trip to more than one developmeni within the property. Shared txip rates are
influenced by the compatibility of the different developments on the site. Another
modification to the trip generation totals (again, scanario specific) shown in Table 1 accounts
fax pass-hy trip behavior. This does not reduce the trip generation fax the devela�znen�
Rathex, it assumes that a proportion of the deve�opment traf�ic is already on the street
system and is diverted ta the d.evelopme�tt. Pass-by tr�ip percentages will typically vary by
;�:�>-;� development tyge. The trip generation rates £or the individual develapments represented irY
'� the different scenarios, along virzth the appropz�iate shared az�d pass-by tnip reductions, are
datailed in the appendix.
As prev�iously indicated, the I7'E 1'rip Generation Manual was used to determit�e trip
generation. tJnfortun.ately, data applicable to Saturday peak hour analysis is limited for a
variety of land uses. As a result, the trip generation rates should be viewed with cautian..
'Z'hose land uses havi.nb limxted c3aia include the fast-food restaurant, movie theater, and
manuf`acturing huildi�ng. These Iand uses were part of the Yndustrial Use Only and
TxxdustriaUCamnnercial Mix development scenarios.
TRIP DZST�BTJTxON AN'D ASS�GNMENT
�i� distribution and assignment to ihe local street network was consistent with the
procedures outlined in the July 6 teclwical memoraxidum. Figuxes 4 through 7 show the
Saturday peak hour site generated tra�iic volumes for each alternative development scenario
3
13.12
612 332 618�
�)7� :.'CI� 95 12: �0 F�1 (312 33� 62�50 B_�RTGIti-ASCfi!1_�� �005- i)19
at select Iocaiions within the study area. For comparison purposes, weekday AM. a.nd P.M.
peak hour szie generated traff`ic volumes are shown as well. The numbers shown indicate
the estimated increase in t:�;o-�vay traiiic at a garticutar location due to development of the
site. R�iih the exception of the Jndustria� Use Only development scenario, site generated
traffic volumes wi11 be greate�t during the Saturday peak hour. This is consistent with the
results reported in Table 1.
Figures 3 throu;h 11 sl�ow the total post-developxnent two-way trafl�c for each scenario at
the same Iocaizons. Total post-development traffic represents the sum of the existixxg
(background) traffic and new site traffc less pass-by trips. With the exception of the
IndustriaUCommercial 1?ix scenario, the tatai post-development trai�ic under the remain�
scenarios will be less on Saturday than either weekday peak hour. Thus, the higher site
generated voiumes during the Saturday peak hour are more than offset by the associated
reduction in existing (background) traf�c volumes relative to the w eekday. Zn Lhe case of the
Industrial/Commercial Mix development scenario, the trip generation from the movie
theater vvould increase tx�affic a2ang lbiain Street and 53rd and �7th Avenues NE to a Ievel
beyond that anticipated during either weekday peak hour period.
AN.ALYSIS
VSrith the exception af the IndustriaUCommercial �Iix development scenario, the to�al post-
development traffic t�oiumes wi?1 be less than the post-development �eekday P.Ni. peak hvux
(and less than the weekclay A.�r. geak hour in most cases). Thus, the Ievei of service
impacts wiIl be no worse than t�ose identified in the July 6 technicat memorandum.
Although some of the develogment scenarios may decrease the level of service at certain
in.tersections, the change would not be signifieant to warrant corrective action {e.g., cha.nge
from Level of Service B to Level af Service C).
YJ�der the InattstriaVCommercial ?4tix scenario, the i.ntersections of 1Liai.n Street/53rd Avenue
NE and Main Streetl57th Avenue NE tivill experience trafiic volume levels during the
Saturday peab. hour that esceed the amount anticipatad during the weekday �.l�i, pea.k haur.
CUNCLUS��NS
The following conclusions are made concern.i.ng the Saturday peak �ioux analysis of the
proposed Home Depot development:
1. Based u�on traffic data collected, existing {backgrouzid) Saturday peak hour traffic
volumes are less than the weekday A.M. and P.M. peaI� hours.
2. The amaunt of trips generated by the alternative development scenarios will be
greatest durin; the Saturday peak hour except for the Yndusirial Y1se Only scenario.
3. With the exception of tIie In.dustriaUCommercial Mix scenarxo, the total post-
development traffic for each scenario will be Iess on Saturday than either weekday
peak honr. Thus, the k�igher site generated volumes duxing the Saturday peak hour
are more than offset by the associated reduction in. existing (backgrouncU traffic
volumes reiative to the weekday.
13.13�
v�� v� � V 1 0 V .
ti; ::,'0: 95 1�: �1 F.�1T dl� 3a� d18�1 B�RTLI�-:�SCHJL�1\
' C� 006: (►1:�
4• The Saturday peak hour Ievels of service for the intersections will be equal or
superior to th�se reported for the weekday P.lI. peak hour time period in the JuIy 6
technical m�emorandum. Alfihpugh some of the deveIopment scenarios may decrease
the Ievel of service at certain i.ntersectiox�s trelative to exi;ting conditions), the
change would not be significani to warrant corrective action (e.g., change fram Level
of Sexvice B to Level of Service C).
5.
��_�
The evaluation of traffi.c impacts should be hased upon the weekday P.1V1, peak hour
as that period repxesents the worst-case time period.
5
13.14
612 �32 6180
i:�; - �0- 9i 1�: �1 F.�1 61� 33: 61g0
Q
a
�
J
�
m �
r�-------�
� �
�
1 S17E �
� I
�------^i
I-694
_—�
1i8.000
�
NO SCALE
HOME DEPOT TRAFFIC tMPACT STUDY
FRIDLEY� MINNESOYA
� Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
� 111 Thnd Ave. 5.. Suit� 330 MinneopoGs. MN 33401
Parsons iransportation Group � �. � c
7
B �RT� �� - �Sc�gaL�`
57iH AVENUE NE
O
a
�
ti
r�
0
0
�
N
N
53Rp AVENUE NE
�OUi%[�1: �
SOURCE; MN/D07
1992 AVERAGE ANNUAI
DAlLY TRAFFIC
Figure 1
.:,;;;;;
��
..�� . .
. bl� �32 61oU
0; •'2i►i9S 1�: �1 F:�1 61� 312 d13U
u��n� R..6
��� IR" 5
& � �tr
ta � �000
��
r—
N
Z
Q
�
��M
� jt, �46
� � � � - _ �
I ��
I �
I ��
' StTE �
!
; �j t
�� , j� e
_ I—o94 _ _
qI
��
�
�
z ,r
m
�
r,a SCALE
'�� � 3a
��. ��s
��
�ao
m r
HOME DEP�T TRAFFIC tMPACT STUOY
FRtDLEY, MINNESOTA
� Barton-Aschman Associates� InC.
■ � t i Third a». s.. Su�ta 3so µtnneeporis. MIV ss�01
Parsons Transpartation Qrou
° 13.16
B �RTU� -dSC'H)I_��
0
N�P�. `
�
�S� `85
36 M ���
26 � aw�
QqtqA
LJ
Q
'r
�
(J)
�
LLI
7
Z
�
O
='�� � 35
.� l �. � $a
'9°s � � t r
360 � �pYo
�•,Q
00
��� +` �aa
�j� �ao
35 � ���
10 '� u,u�a
ao a
�
6?ST AVENUE NE
57TH AVENUE NE
I-694
53R0 AVENUE NE
f�jnOg: [�1;;
�XISTING SATURDAY PEAK HOUR
TRA�FIC YOLUMES
Figure 2
61� 332 6180
(i;/�n:95 1�:2� F3T 61� 33� 6180
9�
140
255
�
cn
Z
Q
+ �
14Q
370 2
4
�_,�_—�
� � I � ao
; �� SITE � azs
z
t� �
cL -- i=6'94 � `�
B �RTO� - �SCH)f_��
w
¢
�
�
�
Z
�
Q� -
�
�
x
61ST AV�NUE NE
LJ2�
2820
327Q
@JuG9•'itl �
KEY•
SA7. PEAK HR.
WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HR.
WB�'KDAY P.�t: PEAK XR.
57TN AVEN�JE NE
a�3a
3830
,¢40
� � 65 1586
zsa ��55
� 53RD AVENUE NE
NO SCAl.E SOURCE: MN/DOT
HaME DEpOT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
�R�o,�eY, MlNN�SOTA pEqK �(�UR GOMPARISON �F EXISTING
TUVO-WAY TRAFFiC VOLUMES
� Qarton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
, t I 1 fiird Av�. 5., Suit� 3Sp Nin�ppp��. MN S340t
Parsons Tranaportation Graup
13.17
Figure 3
`�
a �� � __
`� `� �•ar�^'. �e� ��,
� �612 332 6180 ' �
i7 i�.".0%9S 1�: �� F.a.T 61� 3�� 61�0 B�RTO\-�SCH�L�1,1 '
_ � ,�.� , �..��
, ,
Q
�
�
�
�
z
��
�
NO SCAl.E
�
����o
l�j(11U%O1:
6V
55
;t
Kfi1(.
SAT. `pEAK HR.
W�EiWAY A.M. PEAK HR
w�Er��AY P.et'. p�aK HR.
�
57TH AV€-atl� �E , �.'
_�
35
125 , r�
rzs �':'��"�: '
-- 9.
.. �. . . . 'C,_
�.
.��, � r� � � ) *^ s . , .
�.. y
� - t
.M-. s�"
� `��4 . ��.',
53RA''-AVENUE IVE
� _� ��s .
,��-�
..sb�acE: a+r�/aoT
—
_.� , , � r .
-
i.' `.zi� �1.%5�) ,' _
�'�
1.> I. . ` 3 P.�i_{ ] ':. 3:;i " r; ; �, , � -,.,� �.
�
j�
i
, .,�.. ,1.
�l� .' t F����t:•�n,�'.�i�'.� j.. � ."
i•
" �p
;—
�n
�
�
�i
� !'� R�
� r�
�• ' "-�• ' "' � �� ., + 57 � �►IJ �
—.�..�. � .*`r. .=,a . , .,..�� 1 V ' �i � ..
���
G�`�
. � ��d�
? iG
2S i !�: �.
�D :6rti
A i e,.... a_ .--.. .a,. w.�, `� � i/
� i" j , _ �
J -i �.;
� S�. }.. &ti
J, i : S;
L. .�. .� .,�
�,: I-694
a
#
��
��
a�
�
� � :;t.s:
, a;..
�
�� s�st�
.4�., ��Pd7%� R"�l�Fl,�,lkfr'+kt;T�S7�tlL1 r
��.�Y, ����"��5���
�a
>
�
�
v':
�
w
�
E
�
�`� �
�;. �
• �T�
;RJ
��s .
r,� a
0
�Oil.'�:�;..
���
�,^-i. P�t�K {-ii�.
u`��EK,��+IY A.,",Al. �EA�.K i�Fl.
&i'E'F,fi,'Aa4�" P:1�i. .r°'�.4.K�F.!R_
!VC
� AV�Pvi�� IVC
:a4U?�E; I�iNJ;�t�.t
.y-..P•.-�--Y..j� �v...�:t�.:*v�m.��C•a..,.,�.°��i.ta:.�310�
�'��,�, �°��.���� �
���T� �:: �����' �° . '�,�':� �
: .:�
•
;� ���, ` .�!4►5�i�n�xt /A���x�-r�„.h�+�a � ��b.� _ _? ��� .`�►���'�,"."
.
� } 1 �..� � ,�a�� :���
��, �lws.:,.5,. 5uit� 3'�p , i�in,s�g�e��;s, �� ��� :
a. �„-> !'��'`�' yrja! �ff �P1S�1A£��#�� �`�rt'� '� �#��' �` �.�� �
,.<,wraar: w. �-'�:. �T�,7". �.�+res:-.a.pi%.� r, . � . .. �. . . . .
... � � t • _:s�auw' . 'r. �..^-� .. �, �
. . . . . . :vvz�... ,>, �. .,4,.,�r�.
,. . :1:.:.•.;.
512 332 6180 �
11i%:.'f1i9i 12:23 F:11 612 33� 618U
B�1RTUn- �SC_,H}f_-��
NO SCALE
NOME DEPQ7 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA
� ��rtan-Aschman Associates, Inc.
■ 111 Third twe_ S., Suite 3So Minneapaia, MN 55401
PefSOf19 TfflqSpOliBtlOn C�cp{�j _ _
C�C�1"•O1A
; I�R.
ix xR.
SOURCE: MN/DOi'
PEAK HOUR COMPARISON QF St7'E
GENERAT�D TRAF�'IC VOLUMES
HOM� DEP07' QNLY
Figure 6
61� �32 6180
f.17 - 20 : 9:i 1 �: 2 3 FA1 ti 12 31.`t . 613U,... ,,,.. B3it`i�f�5F�L�.\
.�r..: , . . .. . . .
�,', .
�
NO SCALE
NoME DEPOT TRAFf�e IMPAC7 STUpY
FRIaLEY, MfNNESOTA
- -;�:<,
�013- o1P
� �.
�x HR.
sou�cE: MN/oor
PEAK HOUR COMPARiS4N OF SITE
GEN�RATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
�@arfian-AsGhman Associates, �nc. HOME DEPOT WITH RETAIL
� 111 Third Rve. S.: Suite 750 Ninneqvolis, MN 55407
Parsons Transportat�on Group . � �.A � .
����„
L
__ _ Figure 7
612 332 6180
•07i;,�0,�95 1�:2� F�1T ti1.2 33� 6130 B9RTnN-3SCH�fA�
• �01�-(l19
900
175
zso
E--
�
�
Q
�
� 15Q
405 495
�,.r__� 615
r -�
� 1 I zlo
1 S(TE � s3a
r E
�-� _�i
� J-694'
C] f
��
�'
�
� �
�
NO SCALE
$�
Zso
30S
HOME nEPOT TRaFFIC IMPACZ STUDY
fRIDLEY, IuI1NNESOTA
w
�
¢
�
�n
�
W
�
�
�
1465
1s75
zsss
o1St AVENU� NE
2535
2aso
3325
KEY,
SAT. PtAK HR.
WE�1fDAY A.ivL pEqK F�,
WBE'[CDAY P. M. F�'AK HR_
57TH AVE�UUE NE
2s2o
3255
3955
53RD AVENUE NE
SOURCE: MN/t7pT
PEAK H�UR CQMPARIS�N OF T4TAL
PdS7'-DEVELQPMENT VOLUM�S
� Barton-Aschman Associates, 1nc. �NpUSTRIAL USE 4NLY
� 111 Third Avs. S_. Suit� J50 Minneapolis. MN a5401
Parsons Tre�nsporiation Group FlgUre $
--._. - - 13.22 _
. _. ... .. ;
_ . . ..
612 332 6180
-ti; -:'0: g5 12: 2� FaT 612 332 6130
�
2&0
�ss
305
�
Z
�
370
280 1195
420 445
715
r—__�_�
: r i 6�0
+� SITE � seo
L _ �j
� i-694
a#
�#
�
�
� � 440
280
345
NO SCAI�E
HoM� DEPOT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUOY
FRIp�EY. MIIVNESOi'A
B9RTn� - � S CH�i_��
� �ois: ois
w
¢
�
�n
�
�
�
�
i835
1680
2675
� � sr av�hru� t��
�
27a5
2865
3355
KEY�
SAT. ?EAK ffR.
W�EKDAY A.M. PEAK I�,
TYEEIf,pAy p,1K PEAK HR.
57TN AV�n�uE rvE
348� '
�22s
40�0
53Rb A�JENUE NE
souRCe: MN/ooT
PEAK 1�OUR GOMPAI�ISON OF 'iOTAL
PaST-pEVEL4PMENT VOLUMES
� eartan-Aschman Associates, Mc. �N�USTRlAL/CQMMERCiAL �MIX
. 711 71i7rtl Ave. 5.. Suita 35o Mionropo��s, MN 554p1
Parsons Transpo�tation �roup F19Uf8 8
13.23
�
61� 332 6180
. [isi��(�: g� 1':2-� F�1I (ii2 33� G130
i3Q
160
290
r
c�'�
2
¢
�
� �eo
285 415
405 400
���__�`� 600
l � 360
f S1T� i szs
1 f
LJ-694 — ..�
a
0
�
�
�
m � iss
245
300
NO SGALE
HOM� pEPaT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
FRfbLEY, MINNESOTA
B �RTn� - �SCH�I ��
w
�
�
�
ir�
�
w
�
�
�
1535
�eao
2630
z
S?ST AV�t�'U� !�E
258"
2850
5320
��
_ � � -.�..' 1
� o1e:o19
KEY•
SAT. pEqK HR.
WEEKOAY A.M. PEAK HR,
fYE'EKDAY P.M PEAX' HR.
57TH AV�NUL NE
3023
3200
3945
53R0 AVENlJE NE
SOURCE: MN/QOT
p�AK HQUR CaMPARIS�N pF TOTAI.
PnST-DEV�LQPMENT VOLUMES
� Barton-Aschman Associates, ��c. H4ME DEl�4T ONLY
� � 1' �ird Ave. S.. Sui}C 35Q Mieneapplis• MN 55401 -
Parsons Transportetion Groop Figure 10
13.24
�F,1�� ��.:"? 61 _,p
i�;,-_�ii;•95 1�:2� F:11 612 33: 61`�p B�RTO�-�SGH�f��
�
�
14$
160
zss
�
u-�
�
�
285 495
41 o a�0
840
��`--��
I I 345
� SITE i 54S
� �
j-- _ J
_ _ I-694 . , _,
�,.�
d
�
;!-r
x
w
f
Z
�
,�<>�;�: � •
,,,..::,,. �
� �
� � ? 505
1645
� � 24S 26a5
' 3r3
i.
i'
NO SCALE
HOME OEPOT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
61ST AV�NUE NE
�605
2855
3335
(�i�17- 1i19
KEY�
SAT. PEAK HR.
WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HR.
fYEEKDA,Y P.M. PEAK HR.
57TH AVENUE NE
3075
�2os
3970
53RD AVENUE NE
SOURCE: MN/OOT
� FR,o�EY, M�NN�soTA PEAK H4UR CaMPARlSQN 0� TOTAL
' ,;:;�f; ;
� ' = POST-D�VELOPMENT VOLUMES
'�:''�`"'� � ; HONi� DEPQT WITH RETAiL
E � Bartan-Aschman Assaciates, fnc.
i 11 i Third Avs. S., Su�te 350 Min�ecpdiS. MN 55401
� person TtaAS or4ation (3roup t Figure 11
S � p � � � 13.2:
=
61� � 5Z F�18C1
. li; :: 0 95 12: 2S F�T 612 �3� 6180 B�RTO\-�S�;H�i.-1�
APPENDIX
I�l Olg: U1g
TABLL� A
TRl'p GENEfi.A,TIOiV' T'(7R HOIVIE DEPOT V�rITT� RETATL DEV�LOPII�NT SC�NARIO
F4R SATTJRDAY' PEAK I�OUI�1
Developmer�t XTE Code Area {s� �ips In Out
Hoz�ne Depot 8X2 103,�50 40� 206 199
��� 815 26,600 200 J.Oa 100
Suhtatal -- -- 605 306 �99
Shared Trips -- -- {60) (30} (30)
Pass-r3y 1`rips -- -- (0} (0) (p)
NET TO�"AL -� -- 545 276 269
1�i�Cfi Otll�,�i TI'1D iie7L8!'dli6h Airtn»n1
'T'A�iLE B
TRIF G�IVERATZOIVT F4ft HOME DEP07' qNLY D�VELOPIV.[ENT SC�NARIO FOR
SATt7Ii.DA'Y �EAK �iOUR'
Development f T'I`E Cods
Hoxzie Depc,t $ZZ
Shared �i�s —
PassWBy Trips --
NE� T4'T'AL _�
;a,sed on I2'� 2'rip Generation hlanual
Area (s� 4 Trips
3�03,550 40�
-- (0)
-- (p)
_. -- 405
13.26
� � out
�d6 �99
(a) co�
(0) (Q)
206 199
612 3;"� F�130
i�; ::(tig� 1�:2�� F:�1 612 .:5:52 618i� B�RTO�—�iSCHbi�\ I�Jp19; ti19
TABLE C
TRI� GEtiTE�TIO=�T �'OR, IND�TSTRIAT� US� O1VLY DE'VELOFIVIENT SCENARTQ FOR
SA.TURI7AX PEAI� I�OUR1
r%evelapment ITE A,r�a (sfl �ips In Qut
Code
1Vlanufactuxing (Zoz�e M-2) 140 2�4,000 65 32 33
4ffice� (�one 112-2) 7J.Q 93,000 35 19 26
Subtatal (Zane M�2) -- -- 104 51 49
Shared �-ips -- -- {0) {p) (0}
Pass-$y �Yips _ -- t0) f0) (U)
1V�T �`C�TAL -- -- 200 51 49
1Bi13L`CI CI� jLG ifLO iie7LPYltlir.n ��m»in!
TA�L,E D
'I'k�IP GEN�RATION FOR, TNDUSTRTAL,ICOM1ViERCIAY, MIX DEVELOPN�ENT
SCEN'ARIO FOR SATU'1�.DAY PEAK kIQi71�,1
Development zTE Area {Sfl Tx�ip; In 4ut
Code
iVl�nufacturing (Zone M-2) Is�O 78,104 20 10 10
Of�ices (Zone M-2) ?10 31,000 15 8 7
Subta�Ea1 tZone Nf-2) -- -- 35 l�8 17
1VYavie Theater {Zone C-2) 444 50,aao 1,3"r52 SG6 509
�.estauraxzt (Zone C-�) 833 5,000 505 252 253
Subtotal (Zone C�2) -- -- 1,880 1,118 762
Snbtotal {Zones M-2 � C-2) -- -- 1,915 1,136 779
Shared T`rips -- — (7.88) (94) (94)
Pass-By �ips �- -- (20) (10) (10)
I�T TOTA� -- -- 1,707 1,032 675
�Based oa1TE T�ip Genkration Mtutual
'`ikip gencration bascd on twelae movie �creens
13.27
,:�'S
`,'� .,.�
sk:
,}_�
;}}
� _ - � -
� . . . �
�,
� 7 ! � 4
� � � � i _
— , S , :
: 's i
� t E ! !
��! !3 �ss �!� s ._.. � ----
� � �� ,�� ,� � � � � � � ! �
' ' r a � S S S i 2
����! . � ���
�� � � r . , _ . . : s s
} � .i �
i ° � � � � � � f � i' � : � ; � S S = � : �
o ,� �
�.. ; � i : i � '
> �
~ " � �
�: � i � � �
��' � �I` �� � � � � 5 ����? !
�` � L 1 J .l J J � J
� i� (�."! j�il'i
i ? , -���l.•--s0I3-6�a-- �t----k_2b�N }.yi3Zit??I -
. _ ' I
,m
� . ,
� �, —
�
�� , � �
�� �
�
. ��:
. ���
•
;
� i �
ir �C
-t` �
t �
� � � �
� � �
��2
' y
xe � ��
�� �
�
;;: �
� ��� �
�
; o �
� :_
c
2 �
"` r �
7e� "
�. � � � ;;,,
� �� � ��
_ �- � �
# £ ��`;'��
�. ,
�
Home Depot Comprehensive Plan Amendment
July 20, 1995
PAGE 2
not received priority status from staff. A copy of the
draft ordinance and all correspandence with the DNR has
been sent to the Metropolitan Council.
Though staff believes the Metropolitan Council has forfeited
their right to delay the project (by the timeliness of their
response) the information exchange will proceed as they have
requested.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission's
recommendation of amendment approval, staff recommends the Council
approve the attached resolution.
14.02
RESOLIITION NO. - 1995
RE30LIITION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT, CPA #95-01, BY HOME DEPOT OSA
INC., FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON TRACT A�
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 130, GENFRALLY
LOCATED NORTH OF I-694 AND AE3T OF EAST RIVER
ROAD ON MAIN STREET
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA #95-01, on June 21, 1995 and
recommended approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also conducted public review of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment at their July 10, 1995 City Council
meeting and approved the Amendment at their ,
1995 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act (Minn. Stat. 473.851
- 473.872) requires that local government units prepare and
submit minor amendments to their land use plans to the
Metropolitan Council; and
WHEREAS, a minor amendment is defined as changes to the future
land use plan where the affected area is small or where the
proposed future land use will result in minor changes in
metropolitan service demand; changes in the urban service area
involving less than 40 acres; change to plan goals and policies
that do not change the overall thrust of the Comprehensive Plan;
and
WHEREAS, the City has determined this to be a minor amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Fridley hereby approves the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, CPA
#95-01, with the stipulations attached as Exhibit A.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
THIS DAY OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
14.03
Page 2- Resolution No. - 1995
Exhibit A
1. Approval of plat request, P.S. #95-02, rezoning request, ZOA
#95-04, and special use permit request, SP #95-05.
2. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required if this 14.5
acre parcel is to be rezoned. All fees related to
processing the amendment will be born by the petitioner.
3. The petitioner shall provide verification of approval of the
storm water management plan from the Minnesota Department of
Transportation and the Six Cities Watershed District.
4. The petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of the
traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic
generated by the development including signalization or
other improvements as determined by Anoka County or MnDOT
now or in the future.
�
14.04 '
Metropalitan Council '� � I � �
Working for the Region, P�anning for the Future
July 12, 1995
Mr. Scott Hickok
Ciry of Fridley
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley MN 55432
RE: City of Fridley
Industrial to Commercial Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Metropolitan Council District No. 10
�,,�°�_r '•�� ^ '1 PPf r 1"T^ 1�0�� 5
1�.�ivYOli�uil tAil2'i�:. t., �,: a i..,. � v-
Dear Mr. Hickok:
The Metropolitan Coancil staff has reviewed the city's plan amendment received by the Council
on June 23, 1995. We have determined that the proposed amendment is incomplete for Council
review.
The plan amendment does not include information indicating that the city has adopted the
Metropolitan Council's Interim Strategy to Reduce Nonpoint Pollution to All Metronolitan Water
Bodies. The strategy requires local govemments to 1) amend theu comprehensive plan, land use
controls and stormwater plan to control the quality of stormwater runoff and 2) adopt the revised
statewide shoreland regulations. Adoption of these measures is required after January 1, 1993.
In order to correct the problem of completeness so that the Council can proceed with its review
of this amendment, the city must revise the amendment to incorporate policies that address the
Interim Strategy and indicate its commitment to adopt revisions to its land use controls by a date
certain.
The Council cannot act on the proposed amendment until it receives the needed information, and
the review period for the plan amendment will not begin until the information has been supplied.
If you have any auestions about thi� matter, please contact Richard Th�mpson, nrincipal reviewer,
at 291-6457.
Sincerely,
C��� `�
Chuck Ballen '
Director
CB:ret
cc: Lynda Voge, Metropolitan Council Staff
Richard Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff
Ruth Ann Sobnosky, MnDOT
14.05
230EastFlfthStreet St.Paul,Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fax 291-6550 TDD/7'IY 291-0904 Metrolnfollne 229-3780
An E9� �PP��J �P�
CITY OF FRiDLEY 'PROJECT SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Representatives of Home Depot USA, Inc. have requested a change in
zoning from Industrial and General Business, to C-3, General Shopping
Center. An amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan, from its current
Industrial designation, to a Commercial designation will be required
prior to a rezoning.
SUMMARY OF ISSIIES:
Home Depot, Inc. plans to construct a complex containing a total of
142,316 s.f. of retail space. The Home Depot Store will utilize 103,550
s.f. of that space. The proposed site plan for the facility also shows
an attached 27,972 s.f. Home Depot Garden Center. Attached to the north
wall of the Home Depot Store is a 26,600 s.f. separately owned retail
facility (owner unknown at this time). Provisions have also been made
for a 5,000 s.f. free-standing peripheral retail facility along Main
Street.
RECOD�IENDED ACTIONS :
Staff recommended denial of rezoning ZOA #95-04. Similarly, staff
recommends denial of this request, CPA #95-01, to amend the Comprehensive
Plan from Industrial to Commercial. The amendment would create an island
of commercial in an established pattern of industrial uses.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of a request to amend the
Comprehensive Plan subject to four stipulations (attached).
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commissian and approves
the Comprehensive Plan amendment request, staff recommends the Council
approve the attached resolution.
14.06
l. Approvals of ZOA 95-04, PS 95-02, and SP 95-05
2. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required if this 14.5
acre parcel is to be rezoned. All fees related to processing
the amendment will be born by the petitioner.
3. The petitioner shall provide verification of approval of the
storm water management plan from The Minnesota Department of
Transportation and the Six Cities Watershed District.
4. The Petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of the
traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic
generated by the development including signalization or other
improvements as determined by Anoka County or MnDot now or in
the future.
2
14.07
H O M E D E P O T
C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N A M E N D M E N T
P R O J E C T D E T A I L 8
Comprehensive
Planninq Issues:
Site Planninq
Issues:
Parcel
History:
Approval of a rezoning request on this property
will require a land use amendment from
Industrial to Commercial in the Comprehensive
Plan.
DEVEIAPMENT SITE
In 1974 the Burlington Northern rail lines formed a
Land Development Corporation to aid in the
development of the rail lines property that lined
their Rail system. Burlington Northern had owned
the property since 1965. A Burlington
representative indicated (in 1974) that the property
had not been developed because Burlington had plans
for what they called the Northtown Yards. Their
exact plans for the Northtown Yards were not certain
and until specific plans were available, the Rail
Company did want to dispose of the property.
Burlington's development division did believe that a
Motel to handle their Northtown rail crews would be
an appropriate use of the land closest to I-694.
In 1976 the City reviewed a request by Burlington
Northern and Carl T. George, Georgetown Motel, to
rezone a 4.6 acre parcel adjacent to I-694. The
rezoning would remove the parcel from the City's
industrial land inventory and allow a C-2, General
business designation to accommodate a motel and
restaurant.
In 1977 the rezoning request to allow the Georgetown
Motel/restaurant development was approved. Neither
the restaurant or the Georgetown Motel complex was
ever built. The land from that point was marketed
as a commercial/ industrial opportunity. The City
has received several inquiries for the 14.5 acres
for industrial development; to date, no formal
requests have been made.
K3
14.08 �
EVALUATION OF THE COMPREHEN3IVE PI,AN AMENDMENT CRITERIA
Compatibility of the Proposed IIse with the Proposed District
The proposed use of the site is a series of 3 retail entities
totalling 142,316 s.f. The speculative retail uses are consistent
with the language of the C-3 district. A C-3 zoning designation is
consistent with a Comprehensive designation of Commercial.
Compatibility of the Proposed District with Adjacent IIses and Zoninq
The land use plan in the City's Comprehensive Plan has the subject
parcel designated as Industrial. The land to the east of this
parcel is designated Commercial on the Comprehensive Plan. A C-3,
General Shopping Center complex exists on this parcel.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the areas north, west and south
as Industrial. Industrial uses now occupy a majority of the land
in this area.
** STIPIILATION** The Comprehensive Plan Amendment shall be
approved only after the City has approved ZOA
#95-04, P3 #95-02, and SP #95-05.
Impact on Metropolitan systems
The following criteria are based on criteria used by the
Metropolitan Council to evaluate plan amendments.
Changes to IIrban Service Boundary
The City of Fridley is a first-ring suburb that is entirely within
the Urban Service Boundaries as Defined by the Metropolitan Land
Planning Act (Minn. Stats. 473.851-473.872). Impacts to the
boundary do not apply to tizis proposal.
Changes to Timinq and Staginq of IIrban Service Area
Staging of the Urban Service area does not apply to this proposal
since the area is within the existing urban service area.
Wastewater Treatment
There will be no increase in the amount of wastewater treatment as
a result of changing the land use from Industrial to Commercial.
Discharqe to More Than One Metropolitan Interceptor
The flow from this amended area goes to 4-NS-521 in accordance with
regional plans. The flows will not be diverted from one interceptor
to another.
4
14.09
The Engineering Department has reviewed the grading and drainage
plan to assure that the plan meets the requirements of the City,
Six Cities Watershed District and the Minnesota Department of
Transportation. The storm water will be ponded on site and
released into the MnDot storm water system adjacent to I-694. Two
detention ponds will retain the water on site.
Additional information including calculations and acceptable CFS
measurements by MnDot have been submitted but have yet to be
approved.
** STIPIILATION ** The petitioner shall provide verification of
approval of the storm water manaqeauent plan
from The Minnesota Department of Transportation
and the Six Cities Watershed District.
Transportation systems
The City must determine that rezoning the combination of 4.7 acres
of C-2, General Business and 9.8 acres of M-2, Heavy Industrial is
appropriate.
The use of the subject parcel, as it is currently zoned, would
allow a 4.7 acre commercial use and a 9.8 acre industrial use.
Combined, this acreage represents the largest remaining land
opportunity for an industrial developer. A rezoning would be
required on the 4.7 acre parcel, however rezoning the 4.7 acres to
Industrial is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff requested that a formal traffic study be prepared by the
petitioner to provide a better understanding of the traffic impacts
of this development. For comparative purposes, staff asked for
traffic numbers that could be e�ected if the land developed as it
is currently zoned versus what volumes are anticipated with the
proposed plan.
Based on the impact analysis, there will be an increase in traffic
utilizing 61st Avenue N.E. to Main Street. There will also be an
increase in traffic at certain periods of the day from University
Avenue on to 57th Street. According to the traffic consultants,
this increase will not be sufficient enough to degrade the level
of service at that intersection. The analysis did reveal existing
problems at the intersection that are related to the physical
location of the University Avenue/57th Avenue N.E. intersection in
relationship to the exit from Highway 694 to northbound University
Avenue.
With current traffic conditions it is difficult for a individual to
exit Highway 694, northbound on University Avenue, and cross over
the necessary lanes of traffic to turn left onto 57th Street.
�
14.10
A modest increase in the number of vehicle northbound trips on Main
Street from the development area south of Highway 694 is also
anticipated.
The traffic study also revealed a degradation of service level at
the intersection of Main Street and 57th Avenue N.E. The pre-
development level drops from an"A" (from east approach) to a"D/B"
(east-west approach)
The City Council has asked for additional information regarding the
traffic aspects of this proposal. Specifically, the Council
requested additional information regarding the intersections of 53rd
Ave N.E., 61st Ave N.E. and trip origination.
** STIPOLATION ** The Petitioner shall be responsible for the
. cost of the traffic i.mprovements necessary to
accommodate the traffic qenerated by the
development includinq siqnalization or other
improvements as determined by Anoka County or
MnDot now or in the future.
The City must determine whether the extension of the University/57th
Avenue commercial node west of Main Street is appropriate. As an
entire Industrial parcel (assuming the rezoning of the 4.7 acre
parcel to Industrial), the potential traffic count would likely be
lower. This assumption is based on staff's use of the Barton
Aschman average daily trip generation numbers for a
manufacturing/office complex. Though the Barton Aschman figures
account for less than 10 acres of Industrial, staff multiplied the
potential building size by 3(109 x, 3= 327,300) and determined
that even at 3 times the average daily trips, a manufacturing/office
complex would produce 105 less daily trips.
WEST•
SOUTH•
EAST•
NORTH•
Aviation
ADJACENT SITES
Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning: C-3, Gen. Shopping Ctr.
Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning:
Zoning:
C-3, Gen. Shopping Ctr.
S-2, Hyde Park
Use: Rail
lines and
Use: Vacant
Use:
Use:
Use:
Use:
Developed
Developed
Developed
Mixed
The proposed development is not anticipated to have any impact on
the Metropolitan airport. The development will not be detrimentally
impacted by airport noise.
�
14.11
Recreation Open space
The only impact to recreation open space anticipated by this
amendment is the addition of an easement that will allow the
eventual construction on a bikeway/walkway. A bikeway/walkway will
eventually provide a linkage to the regional trail system.
Housinq
This amendment will not impact the City's housing plan (long term
or short term goals).
Employment
It is anticipated that between 150 and 200 full and part-time jobs
will supplement the City's employment mix as a result of this
development.
STIPULATION3 AND RECObII�NDATION
Staff recommends denial of rezoning request CPA #95-01 given our
previous recommendation to deny the rezoning.
The Planninq Commission recommended approval of Comprehensive Plan
Amendment CPA #95-01 with the following stipulations:
1. Approvals of ZOA #95-04, PS #95-02, and SP #95-05,
2. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required if this 14.5
acre parcel is to be rezoned. All fees related to processing
the amendment will be born by the petitioner.
3. The petitioner shall provide verification of approval of the
storm water management plan from The Minnesota Department of
Transportation and the Six Cities Watershed District.
4. The Petitioner shall be responsible for the cost of the
traffic improvements necessary to accommodate the traffic
generated by the development including signalization or other
improvements as determined by Anoka County or MnDot now or in
the future.
7
14.12
Petition For:
Location
of Property:
D A T A S Ii E E T
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment from a Industrial to
Commercial
West of the intersection of Main Street and 57th
Avenue.
Leqal Description
of Property: Tract A, Registered Land Survey #130, generally
located north of I-694 and East of East River Road
(West of Main Street, fronting on Main).
Size:
Topoqraphy:
Existinq
Vegetation:
Existing
Zoninq/
Plattinq:
Availability
of Municipal
Utilities:
Vehicular
Access:
Pedestrian
Access:
Public
Hearinq
Comments:
14.5 acres
Gradually sloped upward toward I-694. The parcel
sits slightly lower than the surrounding roadways.
Small trees, field grasses.
M-2, Heavy Industrial, Registered Land Survey #130.
Available
3 access points have been planned from Main Street.
A 15' bikeway/walkway easement exists along
Minutes attached
8
14.13
i
�
INFORMATION SUBMISSION FOR
MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
This summary worksheet must be filled out and submitted to the Metropolitan Council with a
copy of each proposed minor comprehensive plan amendmen� Minor amendments include, but
are not limited to:
1. Changes to the future land use plan where the affected area is small or where the
proposed future land use will result in minor changes in metropolitan service demand
2. Changes (land trades or additions) in the urban service area involving less than 40 acres.
3. Minor changes to plan goals and policies that do not change the overall thrust of the
comprehensive plan.
PIease be as specific as possible; attach additional explanatory materials if necessary. If a staff
report was prepared for the Planning Commission or Ciry Council, please attach it as well.
Communities su�mitting regular plan amendments may wish to enter this form or a reasonable
facsimile into their word processing menu for ease in preparation of the form. -
Send plan amendments to• Lynda Voge, Referrals Coordinator -
Metropolitan Council, Mears Park Centre -
230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101-1634
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A Sponsoring gavernmental unit citv of Fridlev
Name of local contact person contact person scott J. Hickok
e.�.�r�� Planning Deuartment, 6431 University Ave. NE, Fridey, MN 55432
TelephonP (612) 572-3599 --
Name of Preparer (if different from contact person) Same
Date of Preparation June 1 1995 —
B. Name of Amendment Main Street Industrial to Commercial
Description/Summary The Citv of Fridley proposes an .amendment to
their Comnrehensive Plan to remove 14.5 acres of industrial land
from the Citv's inventory, to be replaced by a 14.5 acre commercial
iand designation. _
C. Please attach the following:
1. Five copies of the proposed amendmenL
2 A city-wide map showing the location of the proposed change.
3. 'Ihe current plan map(s), indicating area(s) aEfected by amendment�
4. The proposed plan map(s), indicating area(s) affected by amendment.
14.14
D. What is the official local status of the proposed amendment? (Check one or more
� as appropriate.)
X Acted upon by planning commission (if applicable) on June 21 1995
(Recommended Approval)
_ Approved by goveming body, contingent upon Metropolitan Council review,
x Considered, but not approved by goveming body on April 19 1995 ,
� iy7� nnhlir hPar��,g scheduled for June 21, 1995.
�Y..�_�
_ Other
E. Indicate what adjacent local governmental units and other jurisdictions (school
districts, watershed districts, etc.) affected by the change have been sent copies of
the plan amendmeni, if any, and the date(s) copies were sent to them.
ThP Minnpsnta D;,tarrmPnr nf Transnorta i�n i OT) Six Ciries
h
II. LAND USE --
A Descnbe the following, as appropriate:
1. Size of affected area in acres 14 5 acres -
2. Eavsting land use(s� Industrial iundeveloued)
3. Proposed�land use(s Comm�rcial develo ment _
4. Number aad type of residential dwelling units iav�olved
";!A
5. Proposed density N/A
6. Proposed square footage of commercial, industrial or public buildings
1
III. METROPOLTTAN DF.'VII.OPOMENT GUIDE
A_ Popuiatioq Household and Fanployment Forecasts
W�11 the proposed amendment affect the city's population, household or
employment forecasts for 2000, or any additional local staging contained in the
origi.nal plan?
x �to/Not Applicable
� Yes. Describe effec�
14.15
B. Changes to Urban Service Area Boundary
Will the proposed amendment require a change to the boundary of the
community's urban service area?
x No/Not applicable.
_ Yes. Under L C., a map should be attached to show the proposed change.
C. Changes to T'uning and Staging of Urban Service Area
Will the proposed amendment require a change to the timing and staging of
development within the urban service area?
X No/Noi ApQlicable.
_ Yes. Under L G, a map should be attached to show the proposed change.
D. Wastewater Treatment
1. Will the proposed amendment result in a change in the projected sewer
flows for the community? _
x No/Not Applicable.
_ Yes. Indicate the expected change.
Total Year 20D02010 flow for community
based on existing plan 3. 9 7/ 4.15 m�llion gallons/day
Total 2000/2010 IIow for community .
based on pian amendment 3.97/4..15 m�7lion gallons/day
2. If your community discharges to more than one metropolitan interceptor,
indicate which interceptor will be affected by the amendmen�
Flow from amended area goes into 4-NS-521.
3. Will �ows be diverted from one interceptor service area to another?
x NolNot applicable.
_ Yes. Indicate the change and volumes (mgd) involved.
14.16
r
E. - Transportation
1.
200 vehicle trips2.
(see attached
analysis)
F.
G.
�
Will the proposed amendment result in an increase in trip generation for
the affected area?
. �1
No/Not applicable.
X Yes. Descnbe effect.
L1.S Curren�]�v �oned� fhe n te�gain is minimal HnWPVPY� thP average
daily trip increase over a full industrial development is approximate
Does the proposed amendment contain any changes to the functional
classi5cation of roadways? _
� No.
_ Yes. Descnbe which roadways
Aviation
Will the proposed amendment affect the function of a metropolitan airport or the
compatibility of land uses with aircraft noise?
,y� No/Not applicable.
Yes. Descnbe effec� .
Recreation Open Space
Will the proposed amendment have an impact on e�sting or future federal, state
or regional recreational facilities? �
x No/Not Applicable.
Yes. Descnbe effect
However the ulan includes dedicati�n nf a hikewav_/ walkwav
easement to allow future installation of a connector to a
regional trail.
Housing
Will the proposed amendment affect the community's ab�lity or intent to achieve
the long-term goals for low- and moderate-income and modest-cost housing
opportunities cantained in the existing plan?
� No/Not Applicable.
Yes. Descnbe effect
14.17
�
:
� ,r
� 4
�
�;
F 5.
;. �
�.
�y ., ►
�
�
'.
�
M
` i -_', �
_: �
� _; �r
, :
,�I'� ..
a
�l�
■1/■
I �'����ii�#R !�1i1!■
j �i1i"'` �#�i+I��i �ilA■
� �lt�l��l 1.,=:�1■
...,�r��s����x� -
t° s � t �
f � �
� r }I. ; .
r' i
ff �,.
� - -
Y
�.
�^ •� ►
` ` • �
-
� �r�
1
�
�`
,, :;f;
�
,
�
!
�
S
�
,
i
�
�
�MI �r �� •�
.r! �M 1��1 ri
—s �� **w �a
� �� �� sw ��
a�+� �� w�
� 1�1� �� /wlrll
�w �it ��a ••�
■r �we ss !r
��w rriw �w ��
� sra �nr ,�w
�„ � �
,,i,"'''�'
,�
.--_ _'.. �.�--_ .._ --:'-���
,, t
�i,�! '. . ���1#'.
'w� �s ; \ ■
�e�r w�w� '! � ��f�
� � �#��
,..�. �... -- �
�s iws . �
t�w�a �� :. .. `. �! ■�as
� �a� a�s a��
wrs w�s� � � � �
rr� �: � — �
�■ sr� �� �.. a�
� {������� �i�s�i��i� fw
� ■�llllii 11i1i113I1 �w'i
�, "` � �.�`. ���
� � !�
�
�_
r -.- - : " A-"�,�
, - ,.�
_'� � � �'
. � ^- �
_
i . �
/� , �
� ..� ::T
' _: � � � !1
t :"';��i
� � ` `,�_ � �* � �i
. ,�! : _ �
,�+��=�= '
s+► s• �.-'.
w w ,� � I'� - �
i � R �,�► �« ±- �I
w
wi �I �� � '
�w
���
�
i
.
:
-
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 19, 1995 PAGE -23
i
neighborhood. Rezoning the parcel to a commercial desi�g3iation
would afford a wider variety of permitted uses on the�site.
Ms. McPherson stated the last zoning criteria is c;oinplying with
the proposed uses of the proposed district requi.rements.
Because there was not a specific proposal to evailuate, Ms.
McPherson could not comment on compliance witl��the district
requirements. However, unlike the M-1 distr�ct requirements,
rezoning this to parcel to C-2 would allow�it to meet the minimum
lot area requirements of the C-2 districL�. Any future use would
be required to comply with the requirem�nts of the C-2 district.
�
Ms. McPherson stated that the Asses 'ng Department has requested
that the petitioner sign a form to�mbine the three parcels into
one tax parcel. l
Ms. McPherson stated that staff'is recommending that the Planning
Commission recommend approval,.�of the request to the City Council
with one stipulation: ,�`
1. The petitioner�will combine the parcels into one tax
parcel. j
Mr. Dave Meyer stated�he currently owns the property and is
trying to sell it. At the present ti;me it is unsaleable. He has
sold all of the other parcels in the area and he feels this
parcel needs to be'�rezoned before it can be sold.
MOTION by Mr. O�,quist, seconded by Mr. Sielaff to close the public
hearing at 9:53 p.m.
;
IIPON A VOICE�VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE PIIBI�IC HEARING CLOSED. -
MOTION
abnrov
IIPON
3.
�'Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba to recommend
of Rezoning Request, ZOA #95-03.
VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN
D THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
is request will go before the City Cot�ncil for consideration on
y 22, 1995.
PUBLIC HEARING; CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT
REOUEST, P.S. #95-02 BY HOME DEPOT. USA, INC.
To replat Tract A, Registered Land Survey #130 into three
separate parcels, generally located north of I-694 and east of
East River Road.
r�`: ►r�
14.20
i
�
PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, APRIL 19, 1995 PAGE 24
4. PUBLIC HEARING' CONSIDERATION OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SP
#95-05, BY HOME DEPOT USA, INC:
Per Section 205.14.i.C.(11j of the Fridley City code, to allow
garden centers or nurseries which require outside display or
storage of inerchandise, and per Section 205.i5.1C.(7) of the
Fridley City Code, to allow establishments of the "drive-in"
type, selling, serving, or offering goods or services directly
to customers either waiting in parked motor vehicles or to
customers who return to their vehicles to eonsume or use the
goods or services while on the premises, located on Tract A,
Registered Land Survey #130, generally located north of I-694 and
east of East River Road.
AND
5. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A REZONING REQUEST. ZOA
#95-04, BY HOME DEPOT USA, INC:
To rezone from C-2, General Business and M-2, Heavy industrial to
C-3, General Shopping Center District, located on Tract A,
Registered Land Survey #130, generally located north of I-694 and
east of East River Road.
MOTION by Mr. Saba, seconded by Mr. Kondrick to waive the reading
of the public hearing notice and open the public hearing at 9:55
p.m.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MEMBERS VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLIC HEARING OPENED.
Mr. Hickok stated this is a request by Home Depot, Inc. to rezone
the"property located west of Main Street south of a line straight
across from 57th Avenue N.E. between the Burlington Northern
property and Main Street, north of Highway 694.
Mr. Hickok stated that the current zoning on the property is a
combination of M-2, Heavy Industrial (9.8 acres), and C-2,
General Business (4.2 acres). The requested use of the site
would allow a site plan of nearly 144,000 square feet for retail
sales. The primary user for the facility would be 111,716 square
foot Home Depot facility. Home Depot is a large home improvement
retailer founded in 1978 in Georgia. This would be one of the
first Home Depot stores in the metropolitan area. The requested
zoning to allow this facility to be constructed is C-3, General
Shopping Center.
Mr. Hickok stated the Comprehensive Plan issue is one that would
require an amendment, removing 14.5 acres from the Industrial
land inventory in Fridley and changing it to Commercial. This
amendment would have to be apgraved by the City Council and
14.21
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 19 1995 PAGE 25
formalized through the Metropolitan Council.
Mr. Hickok stated the second of the issues involves the rezoning
of the existing industrial and commercial zoning to an all
commercial site of 14.5 acres.
Mr. Hickok stated the third issue would be the loss of the City's
largest remaining industrial parcel.
Mr. Hickok stated the fourth issue involves extending the
existing commercial node further to the west of University Avenue
into what becomes a second tier of commercial activity west of
Main Street.
Mr. Hickok stated the fifth deals with traffic concerns as they
relate to the site. First, the volume generated by 14.5 acres of
commercial has been calculated by Barton-Aschman & Associates who
represent the developer on the traffic issues. The consultant
has provided numbers as staff has requested which would give the
City a comparative analysis between the development of this site
as C-3 as requested and also what would happen to the traffic
numbers in the event that site deveioped as it is currently
zoned. The volume of all commercial traffic will nearly match
the current zoning. The industrial �ortion of the site has a
lower volume of traffic. In the event that the entire site was
industrial and one took those numbers two or three times just for
comparison sake using the entire site rather than just the 9.8
acres, traffic would be in the area of closer to 500 average
daily trips as opposed to the anticipated 525 to 720 Home Depot
trips.
Mr. Hickok stated that access to the site would be via l-694,
crossing University Avenue (Hwy. 47j turning to the left at 57th
Avenue to approach the new facility. Southbound traffic on
University Avenue would turn right onto 6ist Avenue. Barton-
Aschman & Associates has done some traffic counts at these
intersections to provide more detail about the movements in the
current traffic seen at those corners. There are also some
unknown impacts. There is visibility to I-694 but there is not
direct access to 694. What is meant by unknown impacts is the
traffic movements through secondary streets to find the site.
Finally, there is no access to the west. 57th Avenue would serve
the site from University Avenue and from the north and south,
Main Street would serve the site.
Mr. Hickok stated that staff's recommendation on the rezoning
related to some questions about traffic impacts. The rezoning of
this land also has the requests for the preliminary plat and
special use permit somewhat hinged.
14.22
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING� APRIL 19, 1995 _ PAGE 2b
Mr. Hickok provided information to the commissioners in regard to
the consideration of the preliminary plat request. He stated the
current lot configuration at this time is one large lot. The
proposed lot coniiguration would provide for Lot 1 which would be
10.6 acres (Home Depot site), Lot 2 which would be 2.7 acres (an
unknown retailer that would own their own site but be attached to
the Home Depot store), and Lot 3 which would be 1.2 acres
(potential fast food site) for a total of 14.5 acres.
Mr. Hickok stated the Engineering Staff and Planning staff
reviewed informatian and noted that Lot 2 frontage onto Main
Street had been an issue earlier. They were just given a new
site plan which reworks the frontage of Lot 2 and also some of
the site access issues that were brought up by Anoka County.
The remaining issues were access drive locations and circulation,
necessity for cross parking easements (the site plan.is designed
in a manner that would allow cross parking), necessity for
interior utility agreements (it would be the desire of the
Engineering staff to loop the utilities so that water does not
stagnate in the utility system and thereFore the loop system
would require interior utility agreementsj and necessity for
street and utiZity easements (the county has indicated that they
do noi see a need for additional right of way width at�Main
Street however the Public Works Depa�rtiaent has historically
required a 15 foot bikeway/walkway easement along the west side
of Main Street as those sites develop).
Mr. Hickok stated the county has given the City a letter
indicating two access points should be the maximum for this site
and in response to this letter, the developer has provided a site
plan that shows a re configtzred southern access point that is
further away form 694 than originally proposed and to the north
the access has been modified with some anticipation on the site
plan of getting permission to line up that access point with the
intersection. The county did indicate that they would like to
see that be lined up and a full access intersection which would
require some additional land acquisition or at least agreements
with the property owners to the north.
Mr. Hickok noted that Home Depot, Inc. would like to construct a
27,972 square foot outdoor garden center. The code requires that
garden centers and nurseries that are outside have a Special Use
Permit prior to construction. The center would be attached to
the store. The summary of issues related to this request are
1) the architectural detail should be consistent with the
primary structure;
2) no off-season storage in the garden center area of other
garden materials;
14.23
pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 19 1995 PAGE 27
3) no outdoor sales or storage of fertilizer, pesticides or
other potential pollutants;
4) adequate parking must be available to accommodate the
garden center customers; 5) no plant sales outside of the
fence detaii are to take place.
Mr. Hickok stated that in all af the three uses, staff has
recommended that the commission open the public hearing, take
public comments and table the action until May 3rd. The site
plan was just received and the staff has not had an opportunity
to fully evaluate the modifications in the site plan as they
relate to storm water run-off and some of the other issues.
Mr. Kondrick stated it is his understanding that access to this
property will come from three different places; 57th Avenue past
Holiday, another would be 61st Avenue west to Main 5treet and
down to the site and the third would be across the bridge and
then to University Avenue. He was wondering how many cars they
expect to generate.
Mr. Sielaff asked about the issue of loading and unloading at the
front part of the building.
Mr. Hickok stated in discussions with the representative of Home
Depot, this is an important part of their retail operations.
This portion of the building front to back is warehouse lumber
and it gives an opportunity for the customers to drive up under
the canopy and have their lumber loaded into the vehicle at that
overhead door. Staff did express some concerns about a loading
dock on the front of the building and the impacts of that. The
developer has responded by saying that they are iooking at
alternatives to having the door viewed from Main Street. Mr.
Hickok noted that there is a kneewall which is in front of that
overhead door, but stated the developer could provide further
information in regard to this issue.
Mr. Hickok stated the code as it is written states that loading
docks be located in the side yard or the rear yard of the
facility. In the case of the Holiday Plus store, located near
the proposed development site, he noted that it is located at the
side yard and they do have some loading in the rear yard. The
proposed Home Depot is designed to face Main Street.
Mr. Hickok stated if the land were to be developed today with the
M-2 and C-2 designations, (with a typical industrial use on the
M-2 and a typical commercial use on C-2, possibly a theaterj the
trade-off in car counts was a very insignificant difference. In
terms of issue of where that traffic might be coming from, staff
did ask the developer in past discussions, to look at 57th Avenue
as cars come off from University Avenue through the intersection
14.24
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING, APRIL 19, 1995 PAGE 28
and also what kind of activity is anticipated through the
intersection at 57th Avenue and Main Street. In later
discussions as they analyzed this, they then thought about the
cars coming southbound on University Avenue and using 61st Avenue
to the north, coming across and down and also the possibility of
the unknowns with traffic coming from the south on Main Street.
These are the types of things that staff would take a look at and
if necessary get some numbers on those car counts.
Mr. Newman asked if the parcel to the north of the proposed site
is undeveloped.
Mr. Hickok stated no, this parcel is developed. It is an
industrial site.
Mr. Timothy Platt, Real Estate Manager for Home Depot, was
present to discuss the proposal with the commissioners.
Mr. PZatt stated Home Depot is the country's largest retailer of
home improvement goods. They are based out of Georgia and
operate 325 stores and last year's sales were $12.6 billion. A
store of this type would employ between 175 and 200 people, 75�.
of the jobs would be full-time and right now the average hourly
wage in the midwest is $10.44/hour. :Because they pride
themselves in providing good service, they find that they need to
hire ex-trades people and those who are very familiar with the
home improvement business.
Mr. Platt stated in regard to the loading dock on the front of
the building, they do not consider it themselves to be a loading
dock, but rather a customer pick-up door where the customer can
pull up in front and pick up materials. They do not unload
trucks at this location. Under the broad spectrum of the
ordinance, because it is a roll-up door, it is then considered to
be a loading dock.
Mr. Hickok stated the code describes a loading dock as a door for
loading and unloading of material by commercial vehicles.
However the loading and unloading of materials is happening here,
the impacts are the same whether it is a commercial vehicle or
not. In the discussions with the developer, he did ask about
contract sales and contractors picking up their materials there.
This could be considered a commercial vehicle loading in that
location and they responded by saying that for large contractors,
Home Depot does have a delivery service to the site. Staff is
concerned because it is an overhead door and the City could not
preclude commercial vehicZes from loading and unloading there
when the site develops.
Mr. Oquist asked if an actual greenhouse will be located on the
site.
14.25
, , ,,.. . .
pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 19 1995 PAGE 29
Mr. Platt stated yes, it will be completely enclosed by glass.
They sell a lot of very large office-type plants. It is an
actual greenhouse.
Mr. Kondrick asked how the size of the facility compares to
Menards.
Mr. Platt stated that Home Depot is bigger by 40% than most
Menards stores in the area. They merchandise their goods on
pallets. It is very similar to a warehouse operation. One
difference from Menards is Home Depot does not have an outdoor
lumber yard.
Mr. Oquist asked where other materials such as dirt, cement,
block and patio blocks are sold.
Mr. Platt stated these materials are sold out of the outdoor area
but that is in an area that is behind the greenhouse area.
Mr. Sielaff asked if the trip generation comparison which was
completed by Barton-Aschman & Associates was for just retail
customers.
Mr. Platt responded yes.
Mr. Sielaff asked about supply trucks or delivery trucks.
Mr. Platt stated Home Depot receives most of its goods via common
carrier inciuding their lumber and so a lot of the truck traffic
depends on the volume of the store, etc. Their basic receiving
hours are 6:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. He would have to assuYne that i.t
would be similar to any other retail operation that has_common
carrier service. This might be estimated at 15 trucks per day
including UPS, RPS, etc.
Mr. Sielaff asked if the delivery trucks have iarge trailers.
Mr. Platt stated sometimes a delivery truck will come in with one
pallet of goods - it may have a number of deliveries to different
locations.
Mr. Saba asked how soon they would be planning to begin
construction of the facility.
Mr. Platt stated they would like to begin as soon as possible.
They would really like to be enalosed before the frost sets in
this Fall.
Mr. Oquist asked if there would be any concerns about the
additional truck traffic on the streets.
�4.Zs
PLANNING COMMI88ION MEETING, APRIL 19, 1995 PAGE 30
Mr. Hickok stated he did not foresee a problem as these roads
were designed for industrial users.
Mr. Kondrick asked if there were any concerns with trucks being
able to make the turns at the Main Street and 57th Avenue
intersection.
Mr. Greg Frank, representing Home Depot, stated some type of
easement may be requested, however even without it, they feel
they could still have a workable intersection.
The trucks would most likely come in off 57th Avenue. Getting
out of the lot may be a bit more difficult for them.
Ms. McPherson stated that she had a conversation with Mr. Richard
Murphy who owns a warehouse near the site and he indicated that
their trucks are utilizing"57th Avenue as well as coming off of
East River Road. He did foresee a problem.
Ms. Paul LaDuke of Lino Lakes stated they own the lot on 57th
Avenue and 57th Place. Hoiiday owns the empty lot next to
theirs. They have had a chance to sell, but Holiday does not
want to sell. Their lot would certainly be accessible to Home
Depot for their trucks to turn around, but they may not be able
to get Holiday to sell their lot.
Mr. Paul LaDuke of Lino Lakes stated as a customer, if he were
coming east on 694, he would probably chose to exit on University
Avenue, go right for approximately one block and then go through
the neighborhood to get to Main Street.
Mr. Newman informed Mr. Platt that the staff has recommended that
the Planning Commission table action until May 3rd, and asked if
these are time tables the Home Depot can live with.
Mr. Platt stated this was discussed at a meeting with the staff.
If the Planning Commission feels they need more time, it is
acceptable to them.
Mr. Newman stated this would allow staff to review the new site
plan. He noted that they would plan to continue the Public
Hearing on May 3rd. He asked the commissioners to comment on the
proposal.
Mr. Saba stated he has been in a Home Depot store and he was very
impressed with the overall cleanliness and quality of the
operation.
Mr. Oquist stated he feels the proposal looks iike a nice
package. He noted the property seems somewhat landlocked, but
the developer does not have concerns about it, and feeis they can
work it out. He asked if staff could foresee any problems with
14.27
PLANNING COMMI88ION ME$TING, APRIL 19, 1995 PAGE 31
Metro Council in regard to the rezoning of the property.
Mr. Hickok stated the Metropolitan Council will analyze from a
sewer standpoint and from a transportation standpoint and they
will look at the City's Comprehensive Plan and whether there are
any deficiencies in the updates. All of these will be a part of
the equation as they evaluate minor amendments. He would
anticipate that this will be only a minor amendment and something
they should be able to move forward, however he cannot guarantee
this. Staff will start working with Metro Council on this issue
so that things can work simultaneously and will stress to Metro
Council the urgency of Home Depot's schedule.
Mr. Kondrick stated he also has been in a Home Depot store. He
feels they have a good reputation and would be an asset to our
community.
Ms. Modig stated she feels it looks like a good plan.
Mr. Sielaff stated his only concern is about traff ic. He stated
when he comes off of 694 coming from the east and tries to get
all the way over to the left lane on University Avenue he
sometimes has difficulty, especially during peak hours.
Mr. Newman stated he does have a concern about the loss of a
large industrial site. They are a rare premium. The proposal
itself he has no problem with. He would like to make sure that
with the proposal a lot of traffic isn't being dumped onto 53rd
Avenue into the residential community.
MOTION by Mr. Sielaff, seconded by Oquist to continue the Public
Hearings to May 3, 1995, and table action on PS #95-02, SP #95-
05, and ZOA #95-04. _
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL MSMBERS VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSOI,�I-NEWMAN
DECLARED THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOQSLY. /"
� _�
6. RECEIVE THE MINLJTES OF THE PARKS & RECREP,TION CONII�IISSION
MEETING OF MARCH 6, 1995. %
MOTION by Mr. Kondrick, seconded by Mr. Saba, to receive the
Parks & Recreation Commission minutes of March 6, 1995.
UPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON NEWMAN DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINAN3MOIISLY.
7. RECEIVE THE �IINUTES OF THE HOLTSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
MOTIONgby/i�ir. Oquist, seconded by Mr. Kondrick to receive the
Housin �and Redevelopment Authority minutes of March 9, 1995.
14.28
�-
i _
�
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
July 20, 1995 e��
William W. Burns, City Manager .�m ,!
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott J. Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Final Plat Resolution for Home Depot Fridley Addition
On June 12, 1995 a public hearing was held regarding the final plat
for Home Depot USA, Inc. The plat reviewed at the hearing would
create three lots: one for Home Depot, one for the attached retail
use to the north and one free-standing retail use.
Subsequent to the public hearing, the developer expressed an
interest in the possibility of eliminating the attached and
peripheral retail uses from consideration. At this time the
developer has decided that the elimination of the peripheral retail
is the preferred configuration. This means that there would be
two, not three lots platted. Provisions for the attached retail
entity will be included in the final plan.
The County has checked the three lot configuration for accuracy and
has indicated to the surveyor that all numbers are correct. A new
plat showing the two lot configuration is now before the County for
review.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of plat request P.S. #95-02 with the
following stipulations:
1.
2.
Approval of PS #95-02 sha1Z require prior approval of ZOA #95-
04.
The petitioner shall comply with a11 requirements of the Anoka
County Engineering Department.
3. The petitioner shall provide proof of cross-parking agreements
between the 2 independent parcels at the time of transfer.
These agreements shall be recorded with the Anoka County
Recorder's Office at the time the final plat is filed.
4. The petitioner shall provide a utility agreement between the
2 parcels identifying the responsibility for repair,
15.01
Home Depot Fridley
July 20, 1995
PAGE 2
maintenance and replacement. These agreements shall be
recorded with the Anoka County Recorder's Office at the time
that the final plat is filed.
5. The petitioner shall provide a 15' bikeway/walkway easement
adjacent to Main Street prior to recording the final plat.
PLANNING COMMI83ION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary
plat with the 5 recommended stipulations.
ADDITIONAL STIPIILATION:
Now that Home Depot has made their decision to eliminate Lot 3 the
following stipulation is recommended:
6. All standards for landscape, irrigation, curbing, and parking
lot striping shall apply to the land. No portion of the
farmer lot shall be left in an undeveloped state.
15.02
��
O�
� ��
� �
q�
�4 �
�
�
q
�
�
\ \
O
[��?,
�"�i
q�
"� �
� �
O 4
� �
� �o
6 ��°
F
E eR�
; d ���
� 5
� � �s�
� �F
�9 $ ��� 3
a� 5 $�a �
� � ��� �
��a��s�
� �
�*
f �.
�r a 8�5
e� � �ga
�7 � f��
�� � ��
� 9 ��
�� � ���
�� � �_�
� �i
��3
;�
W I
SS
'��'= a
s_"s �
b
�
� � �
� §� ��
g �� ��
E�
a�
�
Q
�
b
�t pa
�� ��
t%7, P.S. #95-02
Home Depot USA
n$x
5
S=B
$3x
��� �
�s� �e
��a
E ��
�6� ��
��� ��
�f
fi�g
Z6��a
fi �'s
����
6
����
I���
�j��
�£�
���
S
b
b
�
B
i
s
E
E
�
�
� �
8� �
kz �
`G� 8J
�
�I
�
Y�
��
4
��RR a
S`��-�,
- Jf
Fga=
a�:�
� °;
����
€' j'
�f
s_�8 g
��_` �
�_�� <
; �g �
i
� �� . �
R
i ;� �
�zie �
�� � �
��
� ��� �
6s; o
Bi�� '�
� �s�� � ;
� �'�a�u� � �
2:��
_! :"I_
irr �
;»(-' � __.�.,�
_i �Y .... _� V O � • I�n6 M �Y) �M�
y ��__ • II __ �:� L: � :i� _ _ _ .
_ p -�M IZ,L4005— }' 1 �'' �
� . ... . s .:. .,
_ "zi��s98" _ � . .1 ^ 2:i �.�— —�a
�_ �'�S � �out �� '
�bnael urvtn an nn.�ryp� ���oaa
� ------ : ------- �------ �
I xR .. _— —�
1 � f F � Fa r '�; .>
� � FB
�: , $ � i "`
i ��<�, - �
� .��., „ i N= ...
Ii ��� I 1,.
p � ... $ # � _' a:s
RcNO � � .,. a I 3 ••:
I�� I\ � �� r w ; i�� �
� �" v p� �'o� :--
r � � ��� � i M� ....
� � �� � � .
° �� 0 � � �
s (; i � : � � ` , -:
� �r � i � F ... I .a:
_ f s � �i, � - �.��
� �1
� \ � M= n:
rng
L 1� ,_t 1 Ni: ..,..
E Z£ ------�_ � cv� <-
.. .� . �, ..J a.a �� e — — — --�
:� t
: ; � 15.03
,; ,
�
=
R
�
6
�
b
� �
8 g
� E
�
�
�
�
=a a
�g ��
�� ��
�� g,
� �9
s
E �j ��
8
�� :
! s� s_
o �� ��
g E
t 9
. �
�
a�
�
�
RESOLUTION NO. - 1995
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAT, P.S. #95-02,
HOME DEPOT FRIDLEY ADDITION
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on the
Plat, P.S. #95-02, on April 19, 1995 and May 3, 1995 and
recommended approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also conducted a public hearing on the
proposed Plat at their June 12, 1995 City Council meeting and
` approved the Plat at their , 1995 meeting; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Fridley hereby approves the Plat, P.S. #95-02, Home Depot
Fridley Addition, with the stipulations attached as Exhibit A,
and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Plat as
prepared by Greenberg Farrow Architecture Inc.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the petitioner is requested to record
this Plat at Anoka County within six (6) months or said approval
with become null and void.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY
THIS DAY OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
15.04
Page 2- Resolution No. - 1995
Exhibit A
l. Approval of PS #95-02 shall require prior approval of ZOA #95-
04.
2. The petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Anoka
County Engineering Department.
3. The petitioner shall provide proof of cross-parking agreements
between the 2 independent parcels at the time of transfer.
These agreements shall be recorded with the Anoka County
Recorder's Office at the time the final plat is filed.
4. The petitioner shall provide a utility agreement between the
2 parcels identifying the responsibility for repair,
maintenance and replacement. These agreements shall be
recorded with the Anoka County Recorder's Office at the time
that the final plat is filed.
5. The petitioner shall provide a 15' bikeway/walkway easement
adjacent to Main Street prior to recording the final plat.
6. All standards for landscape, irrigation, curbing, and parking
2ot striping shall apply to the land. No portion of the
former lot shall be left in an undeveloped state.
0
15.05
/
[� Community Development �Department
C� PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: July 20, 1995
TO: William Burns, City Manager �/��
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott J. Hickok, Planning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Special Use Permit For a Garden Center at Home Depot,
Fridley Addition
On May 3, 1995 the Planning Commission held a public hearing to
consider a special use permit to allowing contruction of a garden
center at Home Depot. During the public hearing, the Planning
Commission endorsed the appropriateness of the use and recommended
approval.
According to the proposal, a 27,972 s.f. garden center has been
designed to be attached to the proposed 103,550 s.f. enclosed Home
Depot retail space. Code Section 205.15.1.c (11) requires a
special use permit for garden centers. The City has reviewed and
approved similar requests under specific performance standards.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of SP #95-05 with the following six
stipulations:
1. Approval of SP #95-05 shall be contingent upon prior
approval of ZOA 95-04
2. The architectural detail of the garden center shall be
consistent with the architectural detail of the primary
structure.
3. There shall be no outdoor sales of fertilizer, pesticides
or other potential pollutants.
4. There shall be no off-season storage with-in the garden
center.
5. The developer shall provide sufficient on-site parking to
accommodate garden center patron parking demands.
6. There shall be no outdoor plant sales (outside of the
16.01
Home Depot Special Use Permit, SP #95-05
July 20, 1995
PAGE 2
confines of the garden center walls).
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission unanimously concurred with staff's
recommendation.
16.02
GARDEN CENTER
�
���
�W(f
�����,
iilf
� — �.�.
._..._ ,� ..�.._..
._..._.� --
��
. _�;
�
Q'� '.:vw,w
FROPfT 9.EVATION
� VM-rb
REAR aEVAT10N
ea .-" --
SP ;',`95-0�
Home Depot
�o
� : _����. . .
i _ �- � � --- -- --._.--:-
l�T SDE H.EVATION
e� . _ _ _ —_
L�T SDE BEVATION W/O G/UtDB� CBJT6i �WALL SHOWN
vn-.o
WEST SOE 9.EVATION
vr-.e
ca��.�■��c�a��acmtrw�ta[�i���pt�ca��.�[o�
� a � • o � • t �.
A C N i� � ![ � O A O N. !. A t �• N f �. C � O f G 1• f 0 l 1 1
., � �'.�"S�"° . __._ �--. �''�:�� -�� _
FRIDLEY =' _
�..,M.+�� ��_� =�'� -
, � M�00TA E�7� '�t}.�LT ��'C7.t�T� -
■ rC1ialOI�NnVOS�vi�MM�/tirOM A%MW
16.03
�:
i
� • a > > � a � s s
DESCRIPTION OF REQIIEST:
Representatives of Home Depot USA, Inc. have requested a special use
pex-mit to allow a garden center at their proposed store on Tract A,
Registered Land Survey 130. This property is Iocated west of Main
Street, north of i-694.
STJNIMARY OF ISSIIES:
Home Depot, Inc. plans to construct a complex containing a totaZ of
142,316 s.f.- of retail space. The proposal consists of a 27,972 s.f
garden center to be attached to the 103,550 s.f.
To respond to this request, the City must first amend the Comprehensive
Plan and rezone the 14.5 acre parcel. The current zoning on the parcel
is a mix of M-2, Heavy Industrial and C-2, General Commerciai. A
rezoning request has been made by the petitioner. The requested zoning
is C-3, General Shopping Center.
In recent years the City has received numerous requests for garden
centers in accordance with Code Section 205.15.1.c (11). You_may recall
that as stipulations to the approval, the City has required such
e�ements as: architectura2 detail consistent with that of the building,
no off-season storage within the garden center, no outdoor sales of
fertilizer, pesticides or other potential pollutants, adequate parking to
accommodate garden center customers, and no plant sales outside of the
fence detail designed to enclose the facility. Many of these concerns
have been satisfied through the design of the Home Depot Garden Center.
the building,
RECOMP�NDED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends approval of SP #95-05 with the 6 following stipulations:
,
16.04
�
STIPIILATION3
1. Approval of SP 95-05 shall be contingent upon prior approval of ZOA 95-
04.
2. The architecturai detail of the garden center shall be consistent with
the architectural detail of the primary structure.
3. There shall be no outdoor sales of fertilizer, pesticides or other
potential pollutants.
4. There shall be no ofF-season storage within the garden center.
5. The developer shall provide sufficient on-site parking to accommodate
garden center patron parking demands.
6. There shall be no outdoor plant sales (outside of the confines of the
garden center walls).
2
16.05
� _
�
I
Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
City of Fridley
DATE: July 20, 1995
TO: William W. Burns, City Manager ��
�
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott J. Hickok, Planning Coordinator
Sign Variance Requests by Collins Signs for Home Depot
USA, Inc.
On June 6, 1995 the Appeals Commission Considered a series of sign
variance requests by Home Depot USA, Inc. Subsequent to that
meeting, a revised proposal has been submitted. The variances
currently requested relate to Home Depot's free-standing sign and
would allow a 40' high sign (rather than 25' as allowed by code)
and would allow a sign size of 160 s.f, rather than the code
allowance of 80 s.f,
ORIGINA?� REQIIEST:
Collins Signs, on behalf of Home �epot, USA, requested 3 sign
variances. These variances included:
-- A wall sign area increase from 321
-- A consolidation of the permitted,
signs (one for each of the 3
consolidated 247 s.f. sign; and
-- An increase in the maximum height
sign from 25 feet to 69 feet.
s.f. to 445 s.f.;
individual 8o s.f.
businesses) into 1
of the free-standing
RECOMMENDED ACTION ON THE ORIGINAL REQIIEST:
.-- Wall sign - staff recommended denial, the Appeals
Commission concurred.
-- Increased sign size/consolidation - staff recommended
approval of the consolidation, the Appeals Commission
concurred.
-- An increase in the height of the free-standing sign -
staff recommended denial, the Appeals Commission
concurred.
REVISED REQIIEST:
A new request was later submitted by the petitioner. The request
for consideration of a wall sign variance was dropped in the new
proposal. The new request would require the following variances:
-- Increased sign size from 80 s. f. to 160 s. f. for the Home
Depot lot only. The consolidation request has been
17.01
Home Depot Sign Variance Request, Var #95-12
July 20, 1995
PAGE 2
m
dropped and the other lot would be entitled to 80 s.f.
sign (the peripheral building has been eliminated from
the proposal).
Increased sign height from 25 feet to 40 feet
SIMILAR VARIANCE APPROVAL:
Home Valu is a business with similar site characteristics. In
1993, the City of Fridley granted Home Valu a sign variance to
allow a sign not to exceed 25' in height and 160 s.f. in sign area.
The Great Northern Industrial Plat was approved in 1985 with a
condition of approval to remove the billboard in 1990. The
billboard was removed in 1991.
** STIPULATION ** All billboards on the Home Depot site shall be
removed within a time-frame to be determined
by the City.
STATED HARD3HIP:
'�Visibility of the store traveling west on I-694 will be obtained
by the front wall sign. However, visibility will not be obtained
by wall mounted letters travelling east on I-694, due to set-back
of the building from I-694; the terrain, topography of the land;
and the railroad overpass. Advertisement to both east and west
traffic is vital to the Home Depots s�ccess and unwarranted vehicle
hazards".
Staff believes east bound motorists on I-694 is at no greater
disadvantage looking for Home Depot, than a west bound motorist
looking for Home Valu. The topographic limitations and sight
constraints of the railroad overpass affect these properties in a
nearly identical manner (depending on direction of travel).
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Staff recommends the following actions by the City Council:
-- accept the withdrawal of the wall sign variance request;
-- accept the withdrawal of the consolidated sign/size
variance request;
-- approve the sign area increase to 160 s.f. with the
stipulation that:
All billboards on this site shall be removed within
a time-frame to be determined by the City.
-- deny the request for a free-standing sign height of 40'
17.02
CoI. L I �Ts SIUNs
i
II� July 5, 1995
City of Fridley
Plan Review
6431 University Ave NE
Fridley, MN 55432
RE: The Home Depot
PIN 22-30-24-41-0004
Dear Council Members:
coll�n+ Si:;n,. tnc.
��zs> �;:,��:�-� r����� r,��:,i
llochan, .�lai,.iina i6 iU3
i i4.9Si-SU��ii lcic��h��n�
i;/.9S�-1 �-`I 1.:�
Please accept this statement as Addendum B to the variance
appiication dated May 8, �995.
AMENDMENT TO THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION DATED MAY 8. 1995
1
�
Removal of the request for 6' tall THE HON� DEPOT and
2' Lall NURSERY letters for the front elevation.
Revision of �he size of the freestanding sign from
a joint tenant sign (19' x 13') to a HOME DEPOT
(12'8" X 12'8°) S1�I1_
ti
3: Revisi_on of the height oL the pylon sign from 69 feet
to 4U feet tall from grade.
PURPOSE UF AMENDMENT
The Home Depot is anxious to work out an agreement with
the City in hopes of resolving the signage issues. With
this directive, we will conform to code for all wall signs
and plead our case for the freestanding (pylon) sign.
REASON FOR VARIANCE AND HARDSHIP
The revised sign size will be 12'8" x 12'8" constituting
160 square feet. This is a size identical to a previously
granted variance for Home Valu dated May 11, 1993.
The revision of the sign height to 40 feet, reflects a 58%
reductioii from the original request of 69 feet. The sign
will be of similar height as the existing billboards on
I-694.
The pylon sign will be located perpendicular to I-694,
approximately 400 feet west from center-point of Main
Street. We will adhere to all city set-back requirements/
stipulations.
17.03
Addendum B
The Home Depot
Page 2 of 2
Visibility of the store travelirig west on I-694 will be
obtained by the front wall sign. However, visibility
will not be obtained by wall mounted letters traveling
east on I-694, due to set-back of the building from I-694;
the terrain, topography of the land; and the railroad
overpas�. Advertisement to both east and west traffic is
vital to The Home Depots success and unwarranted vehicle
hazards.
Please note the enclosed color renderings.
Again, we plead to the board to help us resolve tr.e signage
issue that will benefit both parties and the Home Depots'
fut��e c`�stomers.
Sin
F'
;" 1
�� s
� Pro�ect Manager
via: overnight w/encl
17.04
_
O
c
,
12'-8"
� �
� � _
�r ��=�
� - ��
� ��.�
t ;
The Home Depo#/Fridtey, MN CALLINS SIGNS
ir-� x i2�-g• {1sa sq. Ft.j '=
rHO�7s.cuR�os2�ss $ 17.05 . _
_
-
_ _ __ '
_ ,. �
_ _ _ :i
<
�
_ _
_
_ _ _ _
,
� ,�
.�
_- • . � . ;,
_ .�
; ,a
- .�
- m..:a
;
. . .: ..�_
;_
� ` ��
_ -�
�
,
_,
, _ _
�
-
�
t�.
�.
� �
�
� l�,
�
17.
�
C7
tn
�
z
a
O
U
t
Z p�
� ..,. v�
��t
�
�y mti
��o�
T =
v `
a= °�
EN�U
oKCa�`i
_ : � ,n
m°�or�
� r N �
17.07
�;
z
��
�+, .;,
� ��
� �
�
a
O
V
�
z =
�
�^t
a� _
0
z�i �v
�$ o�
�T C
; O �
EN��
�
s° � ` � a
m� O�
� T � �
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
Representa.tives of Home Depot USA, Inc. have requested a series of sign variances for their proposed
development, west of Main Street at 57th Avenue N.E. The requests include:
1, a wall sign area increase from 321 s.f. to 445 s.f.;
2. an increaseJconsolidation of the 3 pernutted, individual 80 s.f. free-standing signs (one for each of
the 3 businesses) into 1 consolidated 247 s.f. sign; and
3. an increase in the maximum height of the free-standing sign from 25 feet to 69 feet.
SUIVIlVIARY OF ISSUES:
Home Depot USA, Inc is a home improvement retail center. Currently, Home Depot has several land
use applications that have been filed and are being reviewed by sta� the Planning Commission and City
Council. If approved, Home Depot plans to construct a 150,OOQ s.f. retail complex including the Home
Depot store, a smaller attached, but separately owned retail facility (future owner unknown) and a free-
standing peripheral retail facility along Main Street (future owner unknown).
A recommendation of approval by staff would indicate that each of the requests must be consistent with
all 4 criteria used to evaluate all sign variance requests (details in analysis portion of report). None of
the 3 variance requests meet all aspects of the criteria.
Shorewood Plaza was granted a variance in 1988 to allow a consolidated use, 180 s.f. pylon sign (a
100 s.f variance).
RECONIlVIENDED ACTIONS:
Staff recommends denial for sign variance request #1, building sign area. Staff recommends approval of
sign variance request #2 with 3 stipulations (see analysis). Staff recommends denial of variance #3, free-
standing sign height. Though talI signs (liice Union 76) exist within the community, they exist because
they preceded the City Sign Code. No sign height request of this magnitude has received approval
since the adoption of the sign code.
17.08
HOME DEPOT SIGN VARIANCE REQUESTS, 57TH AYENUE N.E. AND MAIN STREET
PROJECT DETAILS
Petition For:
Location
of Property:
I.egal Description
of Property:
Size:
Topography:
Eaisting
Vegetation:
Eaisting
Zoning/Platting;
Availability
of Municipal
Utilities:
Vehicular
Access:
Variance Requests for:
Building Sign Size; Free Standing Sign S.F. Dimension; and Free Standing Sign Height
West of the intersection of Main Street and 57th Avenue.
Tract A, Registered Land Swvey #130, generally loca.ted north of I-694 and East of East
River Road (West of Main Street, fronting on Main).
14.5 acres
Gradually sloped upward toward I-694. The parcei sits slightly lower than the swrounding
roadways.
Small trces, field grasses
M-2, Heavy Industrial„ Registere�i Land� Sutvey #130
Available
Two access points have been planned from Main Street
'; Pedestrian
; Access: N/A
�
� Engineering
�'� Issues: N/A
I °`
�:
�`� Site Planning
Issues:
17.09
Parcel
History:
DEVELOPMENT SITE
The City developed abutting the 1Vfississippi River and had the benefit of not only the river, but also
great rail access and proximity to Nfinneapolis. The rail lines were meant to accommodate Industrial
uses.
The Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan provided the policy direction so that the land in this area
would develop as Industrial. as the metropolitan area developed, it eventually became necessary to
bise�t the Industrial properiies in Fridley with a major arterial roadway. I�'ighway 100 was built in the
1920's. Upgraded as demand warranted, H'ighway 100 eventually b�e a 6-lane divided Interstate
H'ighway and was renamed I�94. Today I-694 is one of the heaviest travelled highways in the state.
In teims of visible access, I-694 brought great visibility to the subject parcel. Vehicular access to this
site, however, is gained from Main and 57th Streets.
In 1974, the Burlington Northern rail lines formed a Land Development Corporation to aid in the
developmern of the rail lines prop�ty that lined their rail system. Burlington Northern had owneri the
property since 1965. A Burlington representative indicated ('m 1974) tha.t the property had not been
developed because Burlington had plans for what they called the Northtown Yazds. Their exact plans
for the Northtown Yards were not certain and until specific plans were available, the Rail Company
did want to dispose of the property.
Bw�ington's development divis�on did believe that a Motel to handle their Northtown rail crews would
be an appropriate land use of the land closest to I-694.
In 1976, the City reviewed a request by Burlington Northern and Carl T. George, Georgetown Motel,
to rezone a 4.6 acre parcd adjacent to I-694. The rezoning would remove the parcel from the Cit�s
industrial land inventory and allow a G2, GeneXal business designation to accommodate a motel and
restaurant.
In 1977, the rezoning request to allow the Georgetown MoteUrestaurant was approved. Neither the
restaurant or the Georgetown Motel complex were ever built. The land from that point was marketed
as a commerciaU'mdustrial opportunity and the City has not received formal development requests for
the 14.5 acres under considera.tion at this time.
WEST:
SOUTH:
EAST:
NORTH:
ADJACENT STTES
Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning: M-2, Hea.vy Industrial
Zoning: C-3, General Shopping Center
Zoning: M-2, Heavy Industrial
Zoning: C-3, General Shopping Center
Zoning: S-2, Hyde Park
17.10
Use: Rail lines and vacant industrial properiy
Use: Vacant
Use: Developed
Use: Developed Industrial Property
Use: Two Family Residential
CITY OF FRIDLEY
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 6, 1995
CALL TO ORDER•
Chairperson Savage called the June 6, 1995, Appea Commission
meeting to order at 7:34 p.m.
ROLL CALL•
Members Present: Diane Savage, Larr uechle, Ren Vos,
Cathy Smith, Car_ Beaulieu
Members Absent: None
Others Present: Scott Hi ok, Planning Coordinator
Michel cPherson, Planning Assistant
Nola eml, New Horizon Child Care
Ja 's Bluxaentals, Blumentals Architecture
Nelson, Everest
osalyn Holderfield, Coliins Signs
Ron Cadwell, Sports Spree
Jon Davison, Sports Spree
George Applebaum, Moore Lake Commons West
MOTIO y Ms. Smith, seconded Mr. Ku�echle, to approve the May 9,
199 Appeals Commission minutes as written.
�ON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON 8AVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTiON CARRIED QNANIMOIISLY.
l. PUBLIC HEARING• CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE RE4UEST. VAR
#95-12, BY HOME DEPOT II.S.A.. INC.: _
Pursuant to the following sections of the Fridley City Code:
Section 214.11.05 to increase the maximum area of a wall "
sign from 321 sq. ft. to 445 sq. ft.; and
Section 214.11.O1.B to increase the maximum area of a free
standing sign from 80 sq. ft. to 247 sq. ft.; and
Sectian 214.11.02.0 to increase the height of a free
standing sign from 25 feet to 69 feet, to allow construction
of wall signs and a free standing sign.
Subject property is Tract A, Registered Land Survey #130,
Anoka County Minnesota, generally iocated at the NW corner
of I-694 and Main Street.
17.11
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JONE 6, 1995 PAGE 2
MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Smith, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice and to open the public
hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON BAVAGE DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND THE PIIBLiC HEARING OPEN AT 7:37 P.M.
Mr. Hickok stated Home Depot USA is requesting a series of sign
variances. Staff requests that the Commission act on each of the
requests separately.
Mr. Hickok stated the Home Depot USA site is located north of I-
694, west of Main Street near the intersection of 57th Avenue
N.E. and the Burlington Northern rail line. Holiday Plus is
located just to the east and is zoned C-3, General Shopping
Center.
Mr. Hickok stated Home Depot USA is the nation's largest home
improvement retailer and has a series of other requests running
concurrently. These requests include a rezoning. The site is
currently a combination of commercial and industrial zoning and
carries a Comprehensive Plan designation of industrial. The 14.5
acre site would be modified on the Comprehensive Plan through the
City Council and the Metropolitan Council. There is a plat being
requested to allow the Home Depot USA store plus another attached
retailer and another peripheral free standing use on a portion of
the parcel near Main Street. The plat would allow three
independent parcels and buildinqs to be owned separately.
Mr. Hickok stated the first request is to increase the maximum
area of a wall sign from 321 square feet to 445 square feet. The
sign is above the main entrance and the parapet steps out to give
some added elevation. The City�s formula for a building sign is
not to exceed 15 X the square root of the lineal dimension of the
building face. This gives proportion to the sign that is
relative to the building. Staff has evaluated this request based
on the following criteria: �
A. That there are exceptionai or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do
not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity
or district.
Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner beiieves that being set back 400
feet from Main Street gives them a distance condition to deal
with and is a hardship condition that would warrant a larger
sign. Staff believes there are no obstructions within that
setback distance from the building to Main Street. The mass of
the building and the corporate colors would tend to draw
attention to the site, and a sign complying with the current sign
code would be of a size to identify what that project is.
17.12
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING JUNE 6 1995 PAGE 3
B. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and district; but which is
denied to the property in question.
Mr. Hickok stated there are other uses in the area includinq
Holiday Plus, Home Value, Menards, Wickes Furniture, etc. which
are very large buildings with very similar conditions off I-694.
They have also had the opportunity to ask for larger signs, but
in the past larger sign requests have been reviewed and the
decisions have not been favorable. There is nothing unusual
about this site that would set it apart from those sites.
C. That strict application of the Chapter would constitute an
unnecessary hardship.
Mr. Hickok stated there is opportunity for a sign. It may be
smaller, but it is very bold in color and the building has a
prominence that would draw a person to it.
D. That granting of the variance would not be materially
detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare
or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district
in which the property is located.
Mr. Hickok stated granting the variance has the potential of
shifting the favor to this site and providing greater visibility
considerations than other buildings within that same vicinity.
Mr. Hickok stated staff's recommendation is to deny this request
for additional building sign area based on a failure to meet the
above criteria. There is a combination of signs. The Home Depot
sign has letters six feet in height and the length is over 69
feet. There is a request also for a nursery identification sign.
This would be set back and was described by the petitioner as
more of an informational sign that this is the nursery and not
the main Home Depot store. The nursery sign is not intended to -
have that full visibility and is setback in a different position
an the building.
Mr. Hickok stated the second variance request is to increase the
free standing sign size from 80 square feet to 247 square feet.
The sign is for Home Depot USA and the two other tenants. This
request is not entirely unusual. The City has had one other
situation for the Moore Lake shopping complex which had a
consolidation request. That request was considered and approved
by the Commission and the City Council. The positive part of the
consolidation is that it does allow one free standing sign as
opposed to three signs. The petitioner would submit an
illustration of how the three signs would appear. A consolidated
sign would give a cleaner appearance.
17.13
APPEAL3 COMMIS3ION MEETING, JUNE 6, 1995 PAGE 4
Mr. Hickok stated this appears to have support historically and
staff has determined that it does provide an uncluttered
appearance and an opportunity to consolidate the signs in one
location. The sign will serve three tenants. The Home Depot
sign would consist of 169 square feet and 39 square feet for each
of the other two tenants. Staff is recommending the foilowing
stipulations if the Commission chooses to recommend approval of
the request:
l. A covenant shall be filed with Anoka County restricting use
of individual free standing signs on Lots 2 and 3.
2. No future variances shall be requested for sign area on this
free standing sign.
3. The Variance shall remain in effect until:
A. The sign is altered in any way, except for routine
maintenance and change of inessages, which makes the
sign less in compliance with the requirements of this
Chapter than it was before the alterations.
B. The supporting structure of the sign is replaced or
remadeled.
C. The face of the sign is replaced or remodeled.
D. The sign becomes dilapidated or damaged and the cost of
bringing it into compliance is more than fifty (50�j of
the value of said sign, at which time all of the sign
and its structure be removed.
E. Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) above, upon the change
of the name of the business being displayed on this
sign.
4. No other free standing signs shall exist on Main Street or
the Highway 694 frontage.
Mr. Hickok stated the Commission may also want to consider
another stipulation relating to the 169 square feet, 39 square
feet, 39 square feet, which states:
5. In the event that Lots 1 and 2 do not develop, Home Depot
USA shall not request a 247 square foot sign.
Mr. Hickok stated this would be a safety net. The sign is
intended to be a consolidation siqn and that is the consideration
given to the request. If this were to become one large Home
Depot sign, the Commission may view it in a different light.
Staff reviewed the request based on the following criteria:
17.14
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 6, 1995 PAGE 5
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do
not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity
or district.
Mr. Hickok stated staff does not ofte
have one land owner with three
package to help eliminate the
appealing presentation.
parcels
clutter
n get the opportunity to
and get a consolidated
and provide a more
B. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and district; but which is
denied to the property in question.
Mr. Hickok stated the development could survive with the free
standing signs.
C. That strict appZication of the Chapter would constitute an
unnecessary hardship.
Mr. Hickok stated denial would allow them to go back to three
signs.
D. That granting of the variance would not be materially
detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare
or detrimental to the property in-the vicinity or district
in which the property is located.
Mr. Hickok stated, as long as
understand from the beginning
80 square feet, we end up wit
the owners of properties 2 and 3
that they are limited to less than
h an attractive package.
Mr. Hickok stated the third request is to increase the height of
a free standing sign from 25 feet to 69 feet. The standard in
all districts for free standing signs is 25 feet. The hardship
presented by the petitioner is that the topography is such that �
it would require additional height so that motorists would have
the opportunity and planning time to get to the exit lane in
order to get to the facility. The petitioner has provided photos
of how the sign would appear at the 69 foot height. Because the
east bound traffic is the most critical, the petitioner provided
a rendering of the sign as it would be seen by east bourid
motorists. Travelling east bound, there is a very large
industrial facility with very large tanks.
Mr. Hickok stated, in staff's evaluation and in looking at the
sign and it's potential location, the sign itself is closer to
the hi.ghway. There is a grade change that would allow an
opportunity to be closer to the highway, still be at the 25 foot
height and miss the blocked view of the tanks. The petitioner
17.15
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JiTNE 6, 1995 PAGE 6
can also put a sign on the back of the building. Travelling
east, there is still some distance before the overpass in order
to exit on University. Staff reviewed the request according to
the following criteria:
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do
not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity
or district.
Mr. Hickok stated, taking this back to other similar entities of
similar size and with similar topography in the general vicinity,
staff believes there are not exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances to say that a height of 69 feet is warranted in
this location. Menards has a larger sign and IInion 76 has a tall
sign. These are considered nonconforming and pre-existing. In
the event they would come in for modification, they would be
asked to comply with the current standard.
B. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and district; but which is
denied to the property in question.
Mr. Hickok stated there are sign possibilities on the site with
the combination of building and free standing signs to give the
prominence that staff believes is needed.
C. That strict application of the Chapter wouid constitute an
unnecessary hardship.
Mr. Hickok stated denial of the variance would take us back to
free standing signs, lower height signs and building signs but
still leave plenty of sign opportunity for the facility. _
D. That granting of the variance would not be materially
detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare
or detrimental to the property in the vicinity or district
in which the property is located.
Mr. Hickok stated staff believes that it has the potential of
additionai visibility that was not considered or allowed on the
other sites in the area with similar characteristics and staff
may then see other requests for additional height and sign size.
If granted, it becomes a competition of its own.
Mr. Hickok stated staff recommends denial of the additionai sign
area; approval of the consolidation request with the four
stipulations, and possibly five stipulations; and denial of the
free standing sign height.
17.is
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 6, 1995 PAGE 7
Ms. Smith asked if the wall sign square footage include the
nursery sign and the Home Depot sign at the main entrance.
Mr. Hickok stated Home Depot would be restricted to a maximum of
445 square feet. The Home Depot dimension comes out at 445
itself. The petitioner's interpretation is that was
informational signage inside the nursery. Staff would view that
nursery sign as additional signage.
Ms. Holderfield stated the Home Depot sign is actually 415 square
feet. The nursery sign is 30 square �eet.
Ms. Smith asked if the sign for Embers was 25 feet in height.
Ms. McPherson stated yes.
Mr. Kuechle asked if staff had any data to show what the Home
Depot sign would look like at 25 feet.
Mr. Hickok stated the petitioner did. Unfortunately, they were
unable to provide the illustration for us this evening.
Ms. Beaulieu asked the height of the other signs on the site.
Mr. Hickok stated these were two billboards which he estimated to
be less than 40 feet high.
Ms. Beaulieu asked, since the 25-foot ordinance was approved, has
the City granted any request higher than 25 feet.
Ms. McPherson stated, according to the variances granted since
1986, the only variances the City has dealt with are sign area
and setback requests. They have not addressed height.
Mr. Holderfield stated this will be a flagship store for Home
Depot USA and they would like to incorporate the corporate logo
which is 6 feet 6 inch letters. They have considered the sign �
ordinance and have brought the size down to 6 feet, which they
feel is adequate and aesthetically pleasing to the building size.
She provided a photo of the 6 foot 6 inch letters to provide an
idea of what this would look like in proportion to the building.
The building is designed for this size letter.
Ms. Holderfield stated, in reference to the nursery, the nursery
sign is 30 square feet and is a directory for the entrance and
exit from the garden center area and is included in the 445
square feet. They feel it is aesthetically pleasing for the
building and again this is a fZagship store for the Minnesota
market. She thought it would be detrimental to their progress
not to be able to advertise properly to future customers.
�7.�7
APPEALS COMMI3SION MEETING, 3QNE 6, 1995 _ PAGE 8
Ms. Beaulieu asked how tall the building ietters would be if they
were to stick to 321 square feet.
Ms. Holderfield stated the letters would need to be 5 feet. This
seems tall but it is small when placed on the building.
Ms. Savage asked if the petitioner had any problems with the
stipulations recommended for the second variance request.
Ms. Holderfield stated there were no problems with the
stipulations.
Ms. Holderfield stated, in reference to the setback, patrons will
be coming off I-694 and they want to remind them that Home Depot
is there and to be visible for cross traffic coming to Home
Depot. In reference to the height, if they are kept to a height
of 25 feet, the sign would be only 6 feet off ground level.
Dr. Vos asked the height of the building.
Ms. Holderfield stated the building would be 25 feet in height.
Dr. Vos stated, with the elevation and the height of the
building, it must go up another 8 or 9 feet to get to the sign.
Ms. Holderfield stated the sign at 25 feet would be below the top
of the wall. •
Ms. Beaulieu asked the height of the Moore Lake consolidated
sign.
Ms. McPherson stated the sign is 25 feet. The City approved that
variance in 1987 or 1988. The height was not an issue at that
time.
Ms. Savage asked the height the Home Value sign.
Ms. McPherson stated she believed that sign was within the 25
feet.
Mr. Hickok stated staff did discuss the clearance between the
bottom of the sign and the ground. There would be nothing in the
code to prohibit restructuring the sign so that Home Depot keeps
169 square feet but to take the two tenant signs and place them
to the side of Home Depot. There are alternatives to give
greater clearance underneath the sign.
Ms. Holderfield stated they also feel that, since they are
consolidating, the City should give them more latitude with a
slightly higher sign. Due to the terrain, they simply will not
have the visibility if the sign is maintained at 25 feet.
17.18
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 6, 1995 PAGE 9
Dr. Vos stated he understood that the billboards were at 40 feet.
Mr. Hickok stated he estimated the height based on the 69-foot
high sign. In relation to the building height, a 69-foot high
sign is a little over a five story building.
Ms. Beaulieu asked if the topography was different from other
sites.
Mr. Hickok stated there are some differences there. They do have
the overpass an this site but the businesses across the highway
also have the same condition. As you get nearer Highway 65, you
look down into a valley to see the signs in that area. There is
topography in each case that may be an argument for a higher
sign, but he thought there was an opportunity for visibility
there.
Ms. McPherson stated, under the standards for billboards, there
is a height limitation at a maximwn of 25 feet above the finished
ground grade unless the sign is intended to be viewed from a
highway. Then the 25-foot height shall be computed from the
center
line of the travelled highway but in no case shall the vertical
distance�between the body of the sign and the ground be reduced
to less than 10 feet. The current code was approved in 1977.
The City issued special use permits in 1975 and 1976 for the
existirig billboards. These are pre-�xisting.
Ms. Holderfield stated, since they are trying to obtain
visibility from I-694 at a distance, they feel the height is
needed to have traffic maneuver over to the exit lane for traffic
safety.
Ms. Holderfield stated they want to go forward with the 69 feet
in height based on a boom test which shows what is going to be
needed to be visible for traffic from both directions. That is
50 feet plus the sign of 19 feet. There are places we could
lower the sign and have visibility perhaps to 50 feet. 25 feet
will not obtain a visibility for eastbound traffic on I-694.
Therefore, a pylon sign would be rendered useless.
MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Ms. Smith, to close the
public hearing.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL oOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON SAVAGB DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED AND T$E PQBLIC HEARING CL08ED AT 8:13 P.M.
Mr. Kuechle stated he thought they could allow some increase in
the amount of wall sign. He felt the nursery sign is information
and not really a part of the advertising sign for the building
itself. He has no problem with consolidating the three signs
17.i9
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JUNE 6, 1995 PAGE 10
into one. Going from 25 feet to 69 feet is a problem. He can
see going to 69 feet but he would have a hard time arguing to
keep it at 25 feet when the billboards closer to the road are at
40 feet. He would be in favor of some compromise between the 25
feet and 69 feet.
Ms. Smith agreed. She had no problem with the wall sign request.
That size of sign on that size of building is not ou� of line.
The consolidated sign is good to take away clutter. The height
increase is too dramatic of an increase. She might have
considered something a bit closer to the required height. But
there are businesses along I-694 with the same conditions and
there exposure seems to be fine.
Ms. Savage stated she had no problem with the consolidated sign
with the stipulations. She would have to vote against the other
requests. One reason is that the other comparable businesses are
conforming to the sign ordinance. She did not think they should
be making an exception here; otherwise, they will have to
consider increasing the signs for the other business. She
understand that a business wants the most visibility but they
must consider aesthetics of large signs. One example is that
huge Union 76 sign. We certainly have seen as we travel many
extremely tail gas station signs. They are helpful to see them
but they are terribly visually polluting. That is the purpose of
an ordinance. The other businesses have been able to conform to
the sign ordinance. She thought this business, as pointed out in
the staff report, is very large and imposing. 5he thought the
business will be well known in the community and it will not be
necessary to have the increased signage.
Ms. Beaulieu agreed with Ms. Savage. She thought 25 feet was a
good number to adhere to. If you could make an exception that
there is 6 feet of topography, you could add that. Since i� is
similar to other businesses that adhere to the 25 feet, she is
opposed to the 69 feet. She has no problem with the second
variance request with the stipulations and likes the
consolidation. The wall sign does not look too bad. Again, it
is the precedent that someone will want an increase in the wall
sign as well. For that reason, she feels the 321 square feet
with 5 foot letters would be as good as the larger 6 foot
letters.
Dr. Vos stated the first variance from 321 square feet seems
reasonable. The second request to 247 square feet with
consolidation of signs and with the stipulations seems to be
reasonable. He is uncomfortable with the 69 feet. It seems
that 50 feet would seem to be nicer. One of the things we have
to be aware of is, when comparing Target, that Target could put
up a 2-foot sign and people would turn off. This business is not
known. If they could think of a symbol, perhaps they could get
1 ?.20
u
APPEALS COMMISSION ME$TING. JIINB 6. 1995 PAGB 11
by with it. He would still have to deny the 69 feet. If they
could come up with some other arrangement, they could have more
space underneath.
Ms. Savage requested a motion to increase the area of the wall
sign.
MOTION by Dr. Vos, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to deny Variance
Request, VAR #95-12, by Home Depot USA to increase the maximum
area of a wall siqn from 321 square feet to 445 square feet.
QPON A VOICE VOTE� WITS M8. SAVAGE, M8. BEAIILIEII AND DR. VOS
POTING AYE AND M8. SMITH AND �R. RIIECHLE VOTING NAY� CHAIRPERSO�i
SAVAGE DECLARED T88 1KOTION CARRIED BY A Ml�i.70RITY VOTB.
Ms. Savage requested a motion to increase the maximum area of a
free standing sign.
OTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Mr. Kuechle, to approve
Variance Request, VAR #95-12, by Home Depot USA to increase the
maximwn area of a free standing sign from 80 square feet to 247
square feet, with the following stipulations:
1. A covenant shall be filed wit3� Anoka County restricting use
of individual free standinq signs an Lots 2 and 3.
2. No future variances shall be requested for sign area on this
free standing sign.
3. The Variance shall remain in effect until:
A. The sign is altered in any way, except for routine
maintenance and change of inessages, which makes the
sign less in compliance with the requirements of this
Chapter than it was before the alterations.
8. The supporting structure of the sign is replaced or '
remodeled.
C. The face of the sign is replaced or remodeled.
D. The sign becomes dilapidated or damaged and the cost of
bringing it into compliance is more than fifty (50$j of
the value of said sign, at which time all of the sign
and its structure be removed.
E. Notwithstanding subparagraph (A) above, upon the chanqe
of the name of the business being displayed on this
sign.
17.21
APPEALS COMMISSION MEETING, JIINE 6. 1995 PAG$ 12
4.
5.
No other free standing signs shall exist on Main Street or
the Highway 694 frontaqe.
In the event that Lots 2 and 3 do not develop, Home Depot
USA shall not request a 247 square foot sign.
IIPON A VOICB VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE� CHAIRPERSON SAVAGB DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIED IINANIMOIISLY.
Ms. Savage reguested a motion to increase the height of a free
standing sign to 69 feet.
OT ON by Ms. Smith, seconded by Ms. Beaulieu, to deny Variance
Request, VAR #95-12, by Home Depot USA to increase the height of
a free standing sign from 25 feet to 69 feet.
IIPON A VOICE VOTE, ALL VOTING AYE, CHAIRPERSON SAVAGB DECLARED
THE MOTION CARRIBD DNANIMOIISLY.
Ms. McPherson stated this item would be considered by the City
Council on June 26.
2.
#95-13, BY NEW HORIZON CHILD CARE:
Pursuant to Section 205.04.OS.A of the Fridley
allow an accessory structure in the front yard
allow construction of a children's play area
a day care center on Lot l, Block 4, Moor k
Center, generally located at 1001 NE Ea More
Fridley, Minnesota 55432.
C" Code to
orde= to
sociated with
West Retail
Lake Drive,
MOTION by Ms. Beaulieu, seconded by Mr uechle, to waive the
reading of the public hearing notice nd to open the public
hearinq. _
IIPON A VOICB VOTS, ALL VOTING � CSAIRPSRSOIi SAVAGB DBCLARBD
THL MOTION CARRIED AND TH$ P LIC HLARING OPBN AT 8:27 P.ffi.
Ms. McPherson stated the equest is to allow an accessory
structure in the front ard. The request is for the West Moore
Lake shopping center ocated at the intersection of East Moore
Lake Drive and Hi ay 65. The property is zoned C-3, General
Shopping Center strict.
Ms. McPherso stated the petitioner is New Horizon Child Care,
who is pro sing to locate in the westerly 40 feet of the
shopping enter. This is the location of the former Country Cluh
Market. The request is to allow construction of a children's t�.,.
play ea adjacent ta the buildinq. In 1994, the City cansidered V�x•.
a v iance request for the same petitioner in the easterly
s pping center. That request had located the chi2dren's p�.ay ,�=
: r�:
���
� _
�
I
[7:���
TO:
Community Development Department
P G DrviSION
City of Fridley
July 20, 1995
William W. Burns, City Manager� ��"
FROM: Barbara Dacy, Community Development Director
Scott H'ickok, Planning Coordinator
Kurt Schneider, Planning Assistant
SUBJECT: 1995 CDBG Human Service Funding Recommendations
On June 1, 1995, the Human Resources Commission met to develop the funding
recommendations for the 1995 Community Development B(ock Grant Human Service Fund. On
June 21, 1995, the Planning Commission reviewed and concurred with the Human Resource
CDBG allocation recommendations.
Listed below are the Human Resource funding recommendations for 1995. Attached to this
memo is a summary of each organization's request and a copy of a resolution which authorizes the
City to enter into contracts with the grant recipients.
Organization
Alexandra House
ARC of Anoka & Ramsey Counties
Anoka County Community Action
Program
Banfill-Locke Center for the
Arts
Central Center for Family
Resources
City of Fridley Recreation
& Natural Resource Dept.
Community Emergency Assistance
Program
Amount Recommended
$2,000
$2,500
$1,000
$1, 000
$2,000
$2, 500
$3,000
1995 CDBG Human Service Funding Recommendations
July 20, 1995
Page 2
St. Philip's Lutheran Church $4,000
Southern Anoka County $3,000
Emergency Assistance
Tamarisk
- .,���-,.. .,
$3,000
Staff requests that the City Council review the 1995 Iiuman
Resource Commission Community Development Block Grant
recommendations at their July 24th meeting. Upon review and
approval, 1995 CDBG fundinq agreements will be established with
each of the participating organizations.
KS:da
M-95-412
�_
� 8.�2
RESOLUTION NO. - 1995
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE
CITY OF FRIDLEY AND RECIPIENTS OF 1995-96
FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDS
WHEREAS, 1995-96 Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) monies
have been made available to the City of Fridley; and
WHEREAS, Anoka County Officials administerinq CDBG funds require that the
City enter into contracts with each service provider; and
WHEREAS, at its meetings of May 18, 1995 and June 1, 1995, the Fridley
Human Resources Comn[ission reviewed and recommended 1995-96 CDBG fundinq
to human service organizations as listed below;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT TIiE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRIDLEY authorizes the Mayor and the City Manager to execute agreements
between the City and the followinq organizations for the provision of
services in accordance with Federal CDBG regulations:
• ._, •�
: _�� • �
Alexandra House $2,000
ARC of Anoka & Ramsey Counties $2,500
Anoka County Community Action
Program
Banfill-Locke Center for the
Arts
Central Center for Family
Resources
City of Fridley Recreation
& Natural Resource Dept.
Community Emergency Assistance
Program
St. Philip's Lutheran Church
Southern Anoka County
Emergency Assistance
Tamarisk
$1,000
$1,000
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$4,000
$3,000
$3,OOQ
iao3
:� �.. -
Domestic Abuse Intervention
Adaptive Equipment Library
Senior Outreach
Art Enrichment
Peer Support
Scholarships Program
Food/Direct Assistance
Youth Program
Food/Glothing
Hospice
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY THIS
DAY OF , 1995.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM A. CHAMPA - CITY CLERK
18.04
WILLIAM J. NEE - MAYOR
�
i
{
CDBC3 HUMAN SERVICS FIINDIN(i REQIIEST
APPLICATION SIIMMARY FORM
APPLICANT NAME:
APPLICANT ADDRESSs
AMOUNT REQIIESTBD:
AMOIINT RECOMMENDED:
AGBNCY FIINCTION:
ALEXANDRA HOUSE, INC.
P.O. BOX 49039
BLAINE, MN 55449-0039
$10,000
$2,000
Provide support services to battered
women and their children and their youth
through: safe, temporary
shelter, crisis intervention,
and systems advocacy, support
education for battered women
children and youth and
education.
DESCRIPTION OF FIINDING REQUEST:
emergency
individual
networks,
and their
community
To pay a portion of the legal advocates salary to support the
services provided to battered women and their children and youth
through the Intervention Program in Fridley. The intervention
program purpose is to intervene at strategic points in the police,
court and counseling systems in order to coordinate and effective
and consistent response to domestic violence.
PAST FIINDING HISTORY (5 YEAR3):
YEAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
AMOIINT RECEIVED
$ 3,500
$ 3,500
$ 4,000
$ 4, 000
$ 4,000
18.05
DESCRIPTION OF PURPOSE
Advocate Training
Community Education
Shelter Subsidies
Hospital Advocacy
Hospital Advocacy
CDBG HIIMAN SERVICE FIINDING REQIIEST
APPLICATION SIIMMARY FORM
APPLICANT NAME:
APPLICANT ADDRE88:
AMOIINT REQIIESTED:
AMOIINT RECObIIrIENDED S
A(iENCY FIINCTION:
Arc of Anoka & Ramsey Counties
1201 89th Avenue NE Suite 305
$2,500
$2,500
Provides advocacy and support services to
people who are challenged by developmental
disabilities and their families.
DESCRIPTION OF FUNDING REQUEST:
Funds are being requested to enhance the Toy and Adaptive Equipment
Lending Library. There is an increased need to expand the adaptive
equipment selection to include items such as communication aids,
daily living aids, and computerized technology. Arc estimates
serving over 50 families in the Fridley area through the program.
PAST FIINDING HIBTORY (5 YEARS)s
YLAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
�IOQNT RECEIVED
$ -0-
$ 1,000
$ 1,000
$ 2,000
$ 1,000
18.06
DESCRZPTION OF PIIRPOSE
Summer Camp Scholarships •
Drop-in Center
Family Services
"Community Connections"
Summer Camping
CDBG BIIMAN SERVIC$ FIINDIN(i RBQIIEST
APPLICATION SIIMMARY FORM
APPLICANT NAME:
APPLICANT ADDRE88t
AMOIINT REQIIESTED:
AMOIINT RBCOMMENDED:
Anoka County Community Action Program
I201 89th Avenue NE, Suite 345
Blaine, MN 55434
$1,000
$I,000
AGENCY FIINCTION: To provide service to Anoka County
" Community members in need. Senior
programs, volunteer programs and
community assistance are the functions of -
the agency.
DEBCRIPTION OF FUNDING REQII88Ts
To fund the Senior Outreach Program which is administered by ACCAP.
The program provides outreach to vulnerable, isolated seniors and
disabled adults within the City of Fridley. Assistance in
accessing social, medical, financial, nutritional or other services
is provided through an Outreach Worker.
**Funding already allocated to this program in 1995 includes:
$2,000 (1993 Reallocation, 6-30-95
spending deadline)
$3,000 (1995 Allocation, Senior Outreach)
$3,000 (1995 Allocation, Senior Companion)
The Senior Program has $956.71 of remaining 1994 funds that can be
spent through December of 1995. With the remainder of the 1994
money and the already allocated 1995 maney the Senior Outreach
Program will have a budget shortfall for next years pragram
operation. This additional request for funds will help eliminate
the existing shortfall.
PAST FIINDING HZ3TORY (5 YEARS):
YEAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
AMOUNT RECEIVED
$ 5,534
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
$ 5,100
18.07
�ESCRIPTION OP PIIRPO88
Senior Outreach
Senior Outreach
Senior Outreach
Senior Outreach
CDBG HUMAN SERVICE FIINDINa REQIIEST
APPLICATZON SIIMMARY FORM
APPLICANT NAME!
APPLICANT ADDRE88:
AMOIINT REQIIESTED:
AMOUNT RFCOMMENDED:
Banfill-Locke Center For the Arts
6656 East River Road
Fridley, MN 55432
$5,000
$1,000
AQENCY FIINCTION: The center seeks to serve aspiring artists
and all members of the general public who
seek enrichment. The mission of the
agency is to promote an awareness and
nurture an understanding of arts, develop
an appreciation of artistic excellence,
and provide opportunities for the public
to experience and develop the creative
process.
DESCRIPTION OF FIINDING REQIIEST:
Funds are sought for ongoing expenses of current classes, the
development of new arts opportunities in conjunction with the
Fridley Community Education Program, and the resumption of a
jointly sponsored program with the Fridley Senior Center. These
programs provide alternative art opportunities for students and the
growing senior population. These cooperative efforts will help
fill the growing void in public education art programs and provide
enrichment for the aging population in Fridley.
PAST FIINDING HISTORY (5 YEAR3):
YEAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
AMOIINT RECEIVED
$ -0-
: 1 :
DESCRIPTION OF PIIRPOSE
Did Not Receive Funds
CDBa BIIMAN 8$RVICE FIINDINa REgIIEBT
APPLICATION SIIMMARY FORM
APpLICANT NAME:
APPLICANT ADDRESSS
AMOIINT REQIIESTED:
AMOIINT RECO1rII�ENDED:
Central Center for Family Resources
1485 81st Avenue NE
Spring Lake Park, NII�T 55432
$3,000
$2,000
AGENCY FIINCTION: To reduce situational stress of
multiproblem families (i.e. abuse,
neglect, chemical use, juvenile status
offense, behavior difficulties,
unemployment), to increase family
strengths and coping skills, and to reduce
the involvement of juvenile clients in the
justice system and encourage increased
coping skills.
DESCRIPTZON OF FUNDING REQIIE3T:
The focus of this request is an expansion of services to children
and adolescents in peer support. Children's peer support groups
are I.ed by trained facilitators and involve 6-8 participants from
5-13 years of age. The purpose is to help children learn and
understand their feelings, defenses, and process of decision-
making. The adolescent groups are facilitated by therapists and
are for youth ages 13-18. Issues addressed include peer
relationships, school problems, and choices concerning
relationships. In 1994, an additional 119 children were served
through children's and adolescent groups, 43 of these children were
from Fridley.
PAST FUNDING HI3TORY (5 YEARS):
YLAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
AMOIINT RECEIVED
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 3,400
$ 3,000
18A9
DESCRIPTION OF PIIRP088
Counseling Services
Counseling Services
Counseling Services
Counseling Services
Counseling Services
CDBG HIIMAN 8$RVIC$ FUNDING REQIIEST
APPLICATION SOMMARY FORM
APPLICANT NAM$:
APPLICANT ADDRESSt
AMOIINT REQIIESTEDs
AMOIINT RECOI�IIKENDED:
AGENCY FIINCTION:
City of Fridley Recreation and Natural
Resource Department
6431 University Avenue NE
Fridley, MN 55432
$2,500
$2,500
To provide safe, healthful, and creative
leisure-time programs to meet the needs
and interests of the public.
DESCRIPTION OF FUNDING REQIIEST:
To expand the middle school Scholarships Program in assisting
families who meet low income guidelines with registration fees.
Participation will be expanded to include pre-school and elementary
age youth. The intent is to make the same opportunities available
equally to all residents of Fridley regardless of financial ability
to pay. Scholarships will enable Fridley youth to participate in
recreational activities sponsored by all school districts which
cover a portion of the City (i.e. Spring Lake Park, Colombia
Heights, Anoka-Hennepin).
PAST FIINDING HISTORY (5 YEARS):
YLAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
AMOIINT RECEIVED
$ 5,000
$ 5,000
�8.��
DESCRIPTION OF PIIRPOSE
Middle School Activities
Youth-at Risk Program
CDBG HIIMAN SERVICE FIINDINQ REQIIEST
APPLICATION SIIMMARY la'ORM
APPLZCANT NAMF:
APPLICANT ADDRE88:
AMOUNT REQIIESTED:
AMOIINT RFCOMMENDEDs
Community Emergency Assistance Program
1209 89th Avenue NE, Suite 130
Blaine, 1�T 55434
$ 3,500
$ 3,000
AGENCY FIINCTIOI�i: To prevent a crisis for an individual or
family through the provision of
intervention services, and to assist
clients in receiving long-term self-
sufficiency services.
DESCRIPTION OF FIINDING REQOEST:
To help families help themselves through special needs assistance,
famiZy loans, supplementary food, a long term self sufficiency
program and MAC (Mothers and Children) program.
PAST FIINDING HISTORY (5 YEARS):
YEAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
AMOtJNT RECEIVED
$ 3,000
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 1,500
18.11
DESCRIPTiON OF PIIRPOSB
Special Needs Assistance
Food Shelf
Food Shelf
Direct Assistance
Direct Assistance
CDBa HIIMAN BERVICE FIINDINa REQIIEST
APPLICATION BIIbII�ARY FORM
APPLICANT NAME:
APPLICANT ADDRE88:
AMOIINT REQIIESTEDs
AMOIINT RECOMMENDED:
Rise, Inc.
8406 Sunset Road NE
Spring Lake Park, NIId 55432
$ 5,OQ0
$ 0
AGENCY FIINCTION: To plan, develop, and provide custamized
employment, affordable housing, and
supported living services for men and
women with disabilities.
DESCRIPTION OF FIINDIN(3 REQIIEST:
To assist in the purchase of three replacement vans and one new
van. The three vehicles needing replacement all have over 200,000
miles on them. In addition to a NIId DOT grant, Rise must secure
$64,800 additional dollars for these improvements. The vans are
used to transport people to job sites throughout the area, 17
Fridley residents are transported daily and numerous Fridley
businesses employ Rise program participants.
PAST FIINDING H23TORY (5 YEAR3):
YEA
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
AMOUNT RECEIVED
$ -0-
$ -0-
$ -0-
18.12
DESCRIPTION OF P'URPOSE
Did Not Receive Funds
n
n
f
k
f
CDBG HIIMAN SERViCE FIINDINa REQIIEST
APPLICATION BIIMMARY BORM
APPLICANT NAMI::
APPLICANT ADDRE88:
AMOUNT REQIIESTEDt
AMOIINT RECOMMENDED:
AGENCY FIINCTION:
St. Philip's Lutheran Church
6180 Highway 65 NE
Fridley, NIId 55432
$4,000
$4,000
Reaches out to share Christian Love in the
community, and to serve all people,
meeting a variety of needs.
DE3CRIPTION OF FIINDING REQIIE3T:
To enhance an after school program called "The Hang Out". The
program is targeted to �'at risk" middle school students and runs
Monday through Thursday 3:OOpm to 6:OOpm. The program involves a
wide range of recreation, tutoring, companionship and group
activities. Staffing includes two paid staff and over 80 hours of
volunteer work each week. Membership has grown to 45 non-parish
members and six parish members. Recently program members have been
asked to speak on the program in several different communities.
The program will need to be scaled back if funding is not received.
PAST FIINDING HISTORY (5 YEAAS):
YEAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
AMOIINT RECEIVED
$ 3,000
$ -0-
18.13
pESCRIPTION OF PIIRP088
After School Programminq
Did Not Receive Funds
CDBa HOMAN SERVZCE FIINDING REQIIEST
APPLICATION SIIMMARY FORM
APPLICANT NAMFS
APPLICANT �DDR888:
AMOIINT REQIIESTED:
AMOUNT RFCOMMENDED:
Southern Anoka County Community Assistance
b27 38th Avenue NE
Coltunbia Heights, MN 55421
$ 6,000
$ 3,000
AGENCY FIINCTION: To serve people in the Southern part of
Anoka County who are not eligible for
other programs and are in need of basic
food and clothing assistance needs.
DESCRIPTION OF FIINDING REQIIEST:
The increase in Fridley resident participation has increased the
need for the SACA food shelf program. It is expected that 40� of
the clients they provide food, clothing, and furniture to during
the next year will be Fridley families. Last year the program
served 1,586 Fridley families, so far for Jan, Feb, and March the
program has served 440 Fridley families.
PAST FIINDING HISTORY (5 YEAR3):
YEAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
AMOIINT RECEIVED
$ 2,000
$ 7,942
18.14
DESCRIPTION OF PIIRPO88
Food Shelf Assistance
General Assistance
CDBQ HIIMAN 88ROIC8 FIINDING REQIIEST
APPLICATION SIIMMARY FORM
APPLICANT NAME:
APPLICANT ADDRE88S
AMOIINT REQIIESTBD:
AMOIINT RECOMMENDED:
Tamarisk Resources, Inc
6240 Highway 65 NE
Fridley, I�IlJ 55432
$ 5,000
$ 3,000
AGENCY FONCTION: To establish/operate a residential
hospice, establish/operate an information
resource center for those with life-
limiting illnesses and their loved ones,
and expand awareness/understanding of
issues related to death, dying and care
of the terminally ill.
DESCRIPTION OF FIINDING REQIIEST:
To allow continued training for hospice volunteers, outreach and
support. This is an ongoing project to assist Tamarisk resources
to become established and build up the community awareness intended
to then support the continuation of the program thraugh individual
donations and memorials.
PAST FIINDING HISTORY (5 YEAAS):
7[FFAR
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
AMOIINT RECEIOED
$ 5,000
$ 4,000
18.15
DESCRIPTION OF PII1tPOSE
Train Volunteer Caregivers
Train Volunteer Careqivers
John Anderson, ADE Leasing, has requested a special use permit to allow
an automobile service station and motor vehicle fuel and oil dispensing
service station in a C-2, General Busir:ess District. The property is
located at 7609 University Avenue (northeast corner of University Avenue
and Osborne Road) .
SiA�IIKARY OF ISSIIEB:
In October 1971 a special use permit to allow a service station and a
rezoning to C-2, General Business were approved for this site. In 1972
a 43' x 49' service station was constructed. The site has been listed
on the market and has been vacant since 1992.
Since this building has remained vacant for an extended period of time
and the current proposal involves removal of the building and
redevelopment of the entire site, a new special use permit is required.
If approved, the petitioner plans to construct a combination brick and
block Jiffy Lube Service facility. It is staff's understanding that all
required soil improvements related to the underground tanks (that were
removed) have been made.
RECOI�Il�NDED ACTIONS:
Staff recoimaends approval of SP #95-06 with the following stipulations:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
PLANI�IIN
The following changes are to be made prior to the issuance of
a building permit:
A. 4 Black Hills Spruce shall be added along the north
property line (Eastern Red Cedar are shrubs).
B. Replace all Honey Locust with Norway Maple. Relocate the
three trees (along Osborne Road) to the University Avenue
side of the parcel to help mitigate the impact of 4
overhead doors facing a major thoroughfare.
C. Underground irriqation shall be installed.
Ventilation will be required for the lower level of the
structure .
Storage of used oil shal]. occur outside.
The used oil storage tank shall be tested, certified and shall
meet allow specifications of the City's Chief Building Official
and Fire Marshal.
The petitioner shall comply with all Anoka County and St. Paul
Waterworks stipulations and obtain all necessary permits prior
to the issuance of a building permit. -
G CO1�II�IISSION RECOI�NDATION: Concur with staff
7 6 0 9 U N I V E It S I T Y A V$ N IT E
8 P E C I A L II 8 E P E R M I T
P R O J 8 C T D B T A I L 8
Petition Bor: Special Use Permit to allow an automobile
service station and motor vehicle fuel and oil
dispensing service station in a C-2, General
Business District
Location
of Property:
Leqal Description
of Property:
size:
Topoqraphy:
Existinq
veqetation:
Euistiaq
Zoninq/Plattinq:
Availability
of Municipal
Utilities:
Vehicular
Access:
Pedestrian
Access:
Enqineerinq
Issues:
Site Planninq
Issues:
Parcel 8istory
1958:
7609 University Avenue
Lot 1, Block 1, Osborne Plaza
35,951 sq. ft.
Flat
trees, weedy grass, shrub beds
C-2, General Business, platted as one lot
Available
Osborne Road
Sidewalk (bituminous off-street trail) along
southern edge of property
The enqineering staff has identified drainage
issues including the lack of a retention basin.
DEVELOPMENT SITE
Standard Oil acquired the subject parcel
1967: The Appeals Conuaission considered a special use
permit request to allow construction of a
service station i.n an R-3, General Multiple
Family district. The Appeals Con�ission
recoanaended denial of the request to the City
Council.
1971: In June, the Planning Commission considered a
special use permit request to a1Zow a service
station, and a rezoninq request to C-2,
19.02
General Business. The Planni.ng Coamnission
recommended denial of both requests to the City
Council.
1971: In October, the City Council deliberated the
use of this site as a service station. After
much discussion a special use permit to allow
a rezoning to C-2 and a service station on
this site.
1972:
1973:
2986:
A 43' x 49' service station was constructed.
A car wash was added.
A canopy was added over the gas pumps.
1992: Soil contamination remediation was performed.
� The site has been improved to meet the federal
guidelines related to contaminated soils from
underground storage tanks.
A1�LYSIB
This property is located in the northeast corner of the intersection
of University Avenue and Osborne Road. Located on the subject
parcel is the original brick service station building that was
constructed in 1972. Today, the canopy is gone and the fue2 tanks
have been removed. The site has been used as a training center by
the Amoco Oil Company in recent years. The site is encumbered by
a 50 foot St. Paul Waterworks easement located along the south
property line parallel to Osborne Road.
The petitioner is proposing to remove the existing building and
construct a new 34' x 77' building. The new brick and rock-faced
block building will include: a carwash, 3 oil changing bays, and
a waitinq/cashier area and a lower level technician operations deck
(below the vehicles to eliminate the need for a hoist). Access to
the site will be from Osborne Road, with one of the existing
driveways to be closed. Access will be on the easterly edge af
the site.
As a result of the reconstruction, there will be less hard-surface,
however, the petitioner will be required to provide on-site ponding.
Calculations to determine the amount of pondinq shall be submitted
to the Assistant Public Works Director for review and approval.
** 8TIPIILATION ** Tbe petitioner will be required to provide on-
site pondinq. Run-oi! Calculations to
determine the amount oi pondinq shall be
sui�anitted to the Assistant Publia Works
Director for review and approval.
The petitioner has submitted a landscape plan.
' 19.03
I
�
** BTIPIILATION ** The followinq landscape plan chaaqes are to be
made prior to the issuance ot a buildinq
permit:
1. 4 Black Hills Spruce shall be added alonq
the north property line (Eastern Rsd
cedar are shrubs).
2. Replace all Honey Locust with Norwap
Maple. Relocate the three trees (alonq
osborne Road) to the University Avenue
side oi the parcel to help mitiqate the
impact of 4 overhead doors facinq a major
thorouqhfare.
3. IInderqround irriqation is required.
The following building and fire code issues shall be addressed prior
to issuance of a building permit:
** STIPIILATION **
** STIPIILATION **
ventilation will be required for the lower
level of the structure.
Storaqe of used oil shall occur outside.
** STIPQLATION ** The used oil storaqe tank shall be tested,
certified and shall meet ai�ew specifications
of the City�s Chief Buildinq Official and Fire
Marshal.
As the site is located on a County Highway, and is encumbered a
St. Paul Waterworks easement, the petitioner shall submit plans to
these two agencies for review and approval. The petitioner shall
comply with any stipulations required by these agencies and obtain
any necessary penaits prior to the issuance of a building permit.
** STIPIILATION ** The petitioner shall comply with all Aaoka
County and st. Paul Wateraiorks stipulations and
obtain all necessary permits prior to th�e
issuance of a buildinq permit.
WEST:
SO •
EAST:
NO :
ADJACENT SITES
Zoning: C-3, General Shopping
Restaurant
Zoning: R-1, Single Family
Residential
Zoning:
Retail
Zoning:
Church
C-2, General Business
Spring Lake Park
19.04
Land Use:
Land Use:
Land Use:
Land Use:
Comprehensive
Plannfnq issues:
Public Hearinq
Comments:
The land use designation is Comaaercial and this
use is consistent with that designation.
To be taken
RECOI�IIKENDATION/ACTIONS
Staff recommnends approval of SP #95-06 with the followinq
stipulations:
1. The following landscape plan changes are to be made prior
to the issuance of a building permit:
2.
3.
4.
5.
A. 4 Black Hills Spruce shall be added along the north
property line (Eastern Red Cedar are shrubs) .
B. Replace all Honey Locust with Norway Maple.
Relocate the three trees (along Osborne Road) to the
University Avenue side of the parcel to help
mitigate the impact of 4 overhead doors facing a
major thoroughfare.
C. Underground irrigation is required.
Ventilation will be required for the lower level of the
structure.
Storage of used oil shall occur outside.
The used oil storage tank shall be tested, certified and
shall meet allow specifications of the City's Chief
Buildinq Official and Fire Marshal.
The petitioner shall comply with all Anoka County and St.
Paul Waterworks stipulations and obtain all necessary
permits prior to the issuance of a building permit.
PLANNING COI�IIKISSION
: Concur with Staff
19.05
�
� ;�� � I/.%/I/%
I � / I
� i�
,� �� �
%�;����,� � �,
. .�.r�_r.4ij��!
�- � •
/
� �€:, � �;�
, � `
�R T� `S ."
'�•�s � � `:.
.�C"J -��
C o M,t�u Y
,
� ':� �� �
. ��� � �., � .::,
/
�.os ZONIN[� M e p
.r
S +i
E[_ �(�
3N �w iJli'1�M
� ���
\` I�
�
z
a
J
Q.
Z
O
�
1
O
i
�
n
SP 1695-06
ADE Leasing
JaI
�� .1
y:
7� 7�a�M,vw�w -
i . ," 'e. � ' 1.
\' .. �.� . . . _ ... . . .
19.07
Q
1
�
�
�
O
�
Q
J
�
�;.
�f
ai�ss
�:.-j�z:�
� :�:•.
;: .
, :s:s :
. ' . 3 � � } F
• EY f�
' #fzs ;
; :...�
as
J s�S�� i
1 � �
u �s;!'za4
� ittt�
:4��� �
: :��te�# �
SITE PLAN� �
. .: .. .... .:. . _ _ __.... . .
. .� .
I �+W' 1111v�f1 —_ _' � N —
.�.�....-'^� J6h1 _l ��1:!` 7w�tiii�rrui . .
,.� :,,:r.... .�o� `�C«G,,...A � 2I3H�SI:I '-. --- _ - .
� �� '�r�41..�yrv !Valt:�:.R; :*Td — s a '
� .
� -- .. - � .:.
; I
( ' �
�
: �
- -- -1 --- --- - -- -- -- - -� .. _
SP #95-06
ADE Leasing
.-.�
i
�
,
;
r
._ _ ' .
. , ,. . , .
�; ; �--,,--�- - . ., .
t; � � -� � �
�. . j � , : �. , :
'•� d :� — _ '- �-- ; ` �(�, �' R �
. �� '_ :s �: — _ — _ r�--_ _,� �
�\ � -t � �: • ' � ° G: � �
� : - _ - 1 ;
• � � -- ` :�_ _ - __ - _ ...�` - a �
. !' ` - .l _ u� -
� < - • -
• '�
. i
�
. -
:: 1
� / :\ ,� ', _ . < . ; {; � ; � d�z
, � ` � � ' ; _ i - .•t�•� �y � e �! I: i
� ' ��_' ;•! `� �---- '- � ti'�•!: :if _ - s - j�
� � . ... _ i � ` � "e
. 1 I f ; �i �
. _ 2
'� � � I = �� . � �
.f �`• f �' : ' ' . I --� ;; ( • a
� _ -w , � j�� � I � i ec
' . '' . -.' •.. � i F, -' =—!l : � 4 : i o
,;-.;:�'�-Z��^ � .T__•o
: .` =� , � J
iT— :=��.r � t {6
.
. . . "_ _ ' _"... _... .� '_'" L_r' `'.. � . .
. —� . . ' T �� _ .
'� .
• �_ �__ T_
� : . t
1
li �.' ' " `` . .
' '" " � •I `__"" _ ' '�_ 1 .
l — _ _ �•�LI ,
0
I
�
I
�
t
19.08 �
--__ _ ---- _----------_-__ ___._..._ ... .......__..
,�,� ' -...- � �1?i _ ..,.�-....-- - �:..� -- — � -
_ ��... ----- 3�7iT�33iT t
.�_ �sa_s ?=Lsia�� On �mr
.�.� -.o...�-�
SP /r95-06
ADE Leasing
��
I < � t:
,o_:
'� �t � +
� z _ �� � �a�
.
. � ���� ���
��j Z -
� s;�$E =e.�
a
�
:i
T T�� auw�A
i
19.09
�
Z
J��,
�j
�
Q
U
�
Z
Q
�
�
:i;:
�
� r;7-
' ��
, �`'•
. i
r�'raf.�.�+�
�ay.\ s »�wras
INl'�-NTV �FV�1N�11
1 . -
3
_
0
�
�
�
W
J
W
i— •
N
W
3
...,.. • �. �,.,,y � N N
j�il, ). J jl(' '.MU11TWt7tl3 — ��
.a.,� ar�o��� � ?I3H�SI3 --=='= -
1 s
:!1'i;i:j!'�;� -j,ii
�1�' �•'� �i �. .
_ ;fi.�•T•• •i
;'.i '� ; :, .
~ '�� �'�i.�' �i
� l;�:j�:f � �' �'�Ij�:
�:�..;: :,:
, .,��: �.
i;o � ;;��i� :.�i:
:� t•� , � �1
� • -� -� 'i
!j �� .�.,��
� :I:I► ! �I
��:�� ,�•�'�
��. 1
_ i � r�
_ � , :�
:�.:. �
�� �� �
� �-��� �f .
�t
� Z� 1* ,fli1���
SP 1�95-06
ADE Leasing
:i
�
Z
0
�
�
�
�
.�
W
2 .
H
. �
�
. N
,�
t
;
i
�
��
i -
�
:
:
1
i
})
•�
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Fn9�nerring
Sewer
Wa�cr
Pa�Ms
Slreels
Ma�ntenancu
William W. Burns, City Manager fi��
John G. F1ora,�Public Works Directoz
�� Jon K. Wilczek, Assistant Public Works Director
july 19, 1995
1995 Sealcoat Program
PW9S-192
In 1995 we are going to have a cut-back sealcoat program which will include
approximately fi0,000 square yards, compared to 290,000 square yards for 1994. With
this cut-back project, we hope to run a close analysis of the application of the sealcoat
products, including the rate of oil used and the rate and size of rock used.
On the major streets to be sealcoated, we are going to use an FA3 Modified which is
slightly smaller than the FA3 rock that we have used in the past but larger than a FA2
which is a quarter inch minus rock On the residential streets we will use a FA2 rock, but
because of its smaller size, does not carry the wear quality of the larger size. By closely
monitoring the amount of rock and oil used, we hope to alleviate, or at least cut back, the
problem with rocks in the boulevard that we have had in the past. Two maps have been
included showing where we will be using the FA2 rock and the FA3 Modified rock.
Bids on this project will be opened on Friday, July 21, 1995. A memorandum with a
recommendation and the low bid will be presented to the City Council on July 24, 1995 for
award of the project on Monday night.
The funds and streets that were originally planned to be done in 1995 but will not be done�
shall be included in the 1996 program The 1996 program will include about 400,000
squaze yards.
JxWtjGF:cz
Attachments
2�.01
IJ
• u •.
...�. �
�
1995 -10 �SEALCCIATING
r
�
��
�
FA-2
� �PROJEC7'�' .
� ��� SEA�COAT
I
an a cno�r
2'�•OZ 19
�� �
�
.►
i' �
_
�
Engineering
y Sewer
��L Water
�
� Q Parks
O 3 Streets
UV Maintenance
W —�
� m
0 =
a
�
.�I I�;.�I���I'�.�� \ II>t �.�I
TO: William W. Bums, City Manager PW95-197
FROM: John G. F1ora,�Public Works Director
.�w Jon K. Wilczek, Assistant Public Works Director
DATE: July 24, 1995 -
SUBJECT: 1995 Sealcoat Project No. ST. 1995 - 10
On Friday, July 21, 199�, at 11:00 am, bids were opened for the 1995 sealcoat project. We
had three planholders, two of which submitted bids for the project. The engineers estimate
for the project was $60,000. ASTECH Corp. was low bidder in the amount of $50,556.26.
In 1995 a total of 240,000 square yards of pavement were prepared for sealcoating. The
intent is to sealcoat 60,000 square yards with this project and sealcoat the remaining
180,000 square yards to be done in 1996 along with the 1996 work. This will make for a
much larger and most likely more economical project for 1996. The 1995 project is
somewhat experimental and allows us to work out details of how to get the best product
from the sealcoating process.
Recommend the City Council receive the bids and award the 1995 sealcoat project to
ASTECH Corp. for $50,556.26.
JKW/JGF:cz
Attachment
��
. .
�.. �
BID FOR PROPOSALS
1995 SEALCOAT PROGRAM, PROJECT NO. ST. 1995 - 10
FRIDAY, JULY 21, 9J95, 10:00 A.M.
PLANHOLDER 81D BC�NC3 TOTAL BID ; COMM'ENT�; ;
ASTECH 5% Employers $50,556.26
P O Box 1025 Mutual Cas Co
St Cloud MN 56302
Allied Blacktop 5% Continental $54,979.06
10503 89th Ave Ins -
Maple Grove MN 55369
Bituminous Roadways NO BID
2825 Cedar Ave S
Minneapolis MN 55407
_
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�■■�
�■.■. ��
��.
I
�,a..��.,
1995 - 10 SEALCOATING
FA -3
ississippi Street
a
61 st A�
II
.■.� s..■
.
� •• �
Lake
L �
�
�
�� �
�-,
PRI�JECTS
�
W E S EA L C �AT
�.
���
,
0
�